Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
5/23/1995 - Regular
~ (lOAN ,~.~ c ~.. ~ ~ a 13 C~~~x~#~ ~f ~.~~x~~C~e ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION AGENDA MAY 23, 1995 r~wAr o' 7f!£ eua xmcr Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement in order to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings or other programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County, please contact the Clerk to the Board at (703) 772-2005. We request that you provide at least 48- hours notice so that proper arrangements may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. ALL PRESENT AT 3:05 P.M. 2. Invocation: The Reverend Steven W. Harris Baptist Children's Home 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS FM ADVISED THAT ITEM T-7, EXPLORE REZONING HAS BEEN COrTTINUED TO 6/13/95 AT REQUEST OF PETITIONER i ® Recycled Paper PMM REQUESTED THAT ITEM T-3, SALE OF SURPLUS WELL LOTS BE COrTTINUED UN1~ AFTER EXECUTIVE SESSION. C. PROCIAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGI~TITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Recognition of Larry A. Logan for his years of service to the County of Roanoke. MR. LOGAN WAS PRESENT TO ACCEPT THE CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION. D. BRIEFINGS NONE E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request to implement a study of potential commercial and industrial sites and approval of resolution authorizing a comprehensive rezoning for economic development purposes. (Timothy W.Gubala, Economic Development Director) R-52395-1 EGK MOTION TO APPROVE STUDY AYES-BL,T,EGK,HCN,FM NAYS-LBE 2. Request for funding to relocate water line in conjunction with Colonial Avenue road project. (Gary Robertson, Utility Director) A-52395-2 FM MOTION TO APPROVE FUNDING OF RELOCATION URC HCN ASKED THAT THESE TYPES OF ITEMS BE BROUGHT TO BOARD ON CONSENT AGENDA IN FUTURE SINCE FiJ1VDS ARE a ALREADY F.A_RMARK~D. GARY ROBERTSON TO COORDINATE RELOCATION WITH NORTHCROSS SCHOOL 3. Request from Virginia Amateur Sports, Inc. for additional funding of $5,000 for FY 94/95. (Elmer Hodge, County Administrator) A-52395-3 FM MOTION TO APPROVE $5,000 FUNDING FROM UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE URC 4. Request to approve advance of funds and reimbursement resolution for expenses related to the Joint Sewage Treatment Plant Facility Project. (Diane Hyatt, Finance Director) R-52395-4 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE RESOLUTION AND ADVANCE OF FUNDS URC F. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS NONE G. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC FIEARINGS N(1NF. H. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA BI,,T MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING AND SET SECOND READING FOR 6/27/95 URC 1. Ordinance to rezone .84 acre from C-1 to C-2 to operate a karate and fitness studio, located at 5407 Peters Creek 3 Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Susan Carol Rolfe and Mark Reinhardt. 2. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to operate a convenience store and gasoline outlet, located at the corner of Plantation and Hershberger Roads, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Workman Oil Co. 3. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to operate a used car lot, located on the west side of Williamson Road 400 feet north of its intersection with Plymouth Drive, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Shelor, Inc. 4. Ordinance to amend the text of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance to allow manufactured homes in the County's agricultural zoning districts pursuant to Section 15.1-486.4, as amended in the 1995 Legislative Session, upon the petition of the Roanoke County Planning Commission. I. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance amending Section 17-14 of the Roanoke County Code, Procurement Code, to provide for certain restrictions on contract modifications. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) EGK MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING AND SET 2ND READING FOR 6/13/95 - URC J. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizing the exchange of certain real estate with Frank D. Porter III and Beverly V. Porter, his wife, in connection with the "Longridge" subdivision, and the south loop water transmission line. (Gary Robertson, 4 Utility Director) 0-52395-5 LBE MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC 2. Ordinance authorizing the donation by lease of office space in the Roanoke County Administration Center to the Friends of the Blue Ridge Parkway. (Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator) 0-52395-6 BI{T MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC 3. Ordinance declaring several parcels of real estate to be surplus and accepting offers for the sale of same. (Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney) CONTINiTED UNTIL AFTER EXECUTIVE SESSION 4. Ordinance authorizing the financing of a local public works improvement, Bonsack Community sewer extension, for Michael Dunn. (Gary Robertson, Utility Director) 0-52395-7 BL,T MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC GR ADVISED THAT A MEETING HAS BEEN SCHEDULED WITH MR. PIERCE ON 5/26 TO DISCUSS HIS SEWER LINE COMPIAINT. 5. Ordinance amending and reenacting sections 12-51 Penalties for Parking Violations and 12-52 Parking on Streets and Highways Generally to authorize the enforcement of zoning violations involving the unlawful parking of vehicles by the issuance of parking tickets for such violations (Joseph Obenshain) 0-52395-8 EGK MOTION TO ADOPT ORD AYES-BL.T,EGK,HCN,FM 5 NAYS-LBE 6. Ordinance amending and reenacting Article I, Chapter 4 Amusements of the Roanoke County Code to conform this ordinance with state posting regulations for water quality and to provide .authority to the Health Director to negotiate recommendations at each swimming pool site on issues related to public health and safety without exercise of regulatory or enforcement powers. (Dr. Margaret L. Rutledge, Director, Alleghany Health District) 0-52395-9 B T MOTION TO ADOPT ORD AYES-BL,,T,EGK,HCN,FM NAYS-LBE K. APPOINTMENTS 1. Board of Zoning Appeals 2. Clean Valley Council HCN NOMINATED VINCE REYNOLDS TO ANOTHER TWO-YEAR TERM EXPIRING 6/30/97. 3. Fifth Planning District Commission LBE NOMINATED LEE OSBORNE TO SERVE A THREE YEAR TERM ON THE EXECUTIVE COMIVHTTEE EXPIRING 6/30/98. 4. Highway and Transportation Safety Commission CHIEF CEASE TO RECONIlVIEND POLICE APPOINTEE HCN SUGGESTED TAMES MARTIN AS SENIOR CITIZEN LBE SUGGESTED CONTACTING APPROPRIATE ORGANIZATIONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS. 5. Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission 6 HCN NOMINATED BOBBY G. SEMONES TO ANOTHER THREE-YEAR TERM EXPIRING 6/30/98 6. Roanoke Valley Regional Cable TV Committee HCN NOMINATED TAMES $. DICKEY, MEMBER AT LARGE, FOR ANOTHER THREE-YEAR TERM EXPIRING 6/11/98. 7. Virginia Western Community College Board HCN CONTACTED DR DOWNS FOR RECOMII~NDATIONS L. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDEREDy BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTE'b BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILD BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. R-52395-10 BLOT MOTION TO ADOPT CIJNSENT RESO AFTER DISCUSSION OF I'T'EM 5 AND REMOVAL OF ITEM 2. URC 1. Approval of Minutes for April 25, 1995. 2. Confirmation of committee appointments to the Board of Zoning Appeals, Clean Valley Council, Fifth Planning District Commission, Highway and Transportation Safety Commission, Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission, and Virginia Western Community College Board. A-52395-10.a BLOT MOTION TO APPROVE WITH VWCC BOARD REMOVED FOR SEPARATE VOTE - URC B T MOTION TO APPROVE APPOINTMENT OF GEOFFREY OTTAWAY TO VWCC BOARD AYES-BL~T,EGK,HCN,FM NAYS-LBE 3. R-52395-10.b 4. A-52395-10.c 5. A-52395-10.d 6. A-52395-10.e Resolution of Congratulations to Total Action Against Poverty upon their 30th Anniversary. Acceptance of sanitary sewer facilities serving the Orchards - Botetourt South, Section 3. Donation of drainage easements on Lots 6 through 10, Block 1, Section 1, The Gardens of Cotton Hill. Authorization to move forward with "No Charge" Motorola Engineering Study to upgrade 800MHZ radio system. M. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS Supervisor Kohinke: (1) Received memo on forestry land use, and asked whether there would be changes. PMM responded that to handle this issue would require additional staff. EGK felt objective standards should be used and would be in favor of a work session to discuss further. John Birckhead described how forestry land use worked. Supervisor Eddy: (1) Remarked that Towers-Perrin study suggested meetings among the regional governments and asked if a date had been set for the next joint meeting with Roanoke City Council. ECH responded that three dates have been suggested in .Tune and we are waiting for response from Roanoke City Council. (2) Received information from PMM regarding early retirement provisions for County Administrator and School Superintendent and asked if action is required. BI,,T responded that if the Couaty takes no action, the law remains the same. HCN responded he would prefer that the County take specific action. ECH and FM to review the provision and bring back to Board in June. (3) Has viewed GSTN videos on RVTV and thought they were interesting. (4~ggested that Board become involved in Urban Summitt being held in June. (5) Attended a seminar on the Gypsy moth and was advised that the gypsy s moth should be in the Roanoke Valley in two to three years. LBE felt that County should begin thinking about a program to combat the problem. Supervisor Nickens: (~ Received memo from ECH and Diane Hyatt regarding financial reporting to Board and he recommended quarterly reports. 2) Received memo from PMM regarding use of E911 tax for upgrade of the 800 MHZ system and suggested adding to County's legislative agenda. 3) Has been informed that street signs can be paid from E911 tax and suggested that money be transferred from that account to Parks & Rec where signs are currently being made. (4) Expressed concern about memo from ECH regarding construction of concession stand and restrooms by private funds at Starkey Park and whether funds would be reimbursed if park is used for new high school. Following discussion, HCN asked that future use of Starkey Park be placed on 6/13 agenda. (5~ Received communication from Tohn Chambliss regarding ad hoc study of fire and rescue. Asked for reuort on number of written or verbal complaints County has received concerning fire and rescue service. N. CITIZENS' COMII~NTS AND COMMUNICATIONS O. REPORTS BI{T MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE -UW 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Accounts Paid -April 1995 5. Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investment and Portfolio Policy, as of April 30, 1995. 6. Bond Project Status Report 7. Additions to the Secondary System of State Highways Made Effective in April, 1995 8. Statement of Revenues and Expenditures as of April 30, 1995. P. BUDGET WORK SESSION - ECH AND PMM EVALUATION SCHEDULED FOR 6/13/95 - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL FUNDING FROM CONVENTION AND VISITORS BUREAU WILL BE INCLUDED IN NEXT YEAR'S BUDGET. - NO CONSENSUS ON MEMBERSHIP IN URBAN PARTNERSHIP. ECH TO PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION. - CONSENSUS NOT TO RESPOND TO RT&WN ARTICLE ON FIRE AND RESCUE VOLUNTEERS. - ECH, TF, TMC TO LOOK AT PROGRAMS RECOGNIZING VOLUNTEERS - ECH TO PROVIDE QUARTERLY REPORTS ON REVENUES - TERRY E[~~RRINGTON TO LET PI.A-NNING COMIVIISSION KNOW THAT BEAUTIFICATION PROGRAM HAS BEEN FUNDED. Q. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (3) DISPOSITION OF SURPLUS REAL ESTATE, WELL LOTS. HCN MOTION TO GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION AT 6:25 P.M. AYES-EGK,LBE,HCN,FM ABSENT-BI4T R. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION R-52395-11 HCN MOTION TO RETURN TO OPEN SESSION AT 7:03 P.M. AND ADOPT RESO AYES-EGK,LBE,HCN,FM ABSENT-BI,J io SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE (CONTINUED FROM AFTERNOON SESSION) 1. Ordinance declaring several parcels of real estate to be surplus and accepting offers for the sale of same. (Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney) 0-52395-12 LBE MOTION TO ADOPT ORD TO ACCEPT ONLY THE BID OF $30,000 FROM THOMAS NEWCOMB FOR F[UNTING HILLS REAL ESTATE, TAX MAP PARCEL NO. 88.13-3-28 AYES-EGK,LBE,HCN,FM NAYS-NONE PRESENT-BLJ EVENING SESSION S. PROCIAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Resolution of Congratulations to Oak Grove Elementary School Parent-Teacher Association for receiving the State Award from the National PTA. R-52395-13 LBE MOTION TO ADOPT RESO DEBBIE IANDGRAFF AND PTA OFFICERS WERE PRESENT TO ACCEPT RESOLUTION. T. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance vacating a portion of 50 foot right-of~vay and temporary cul-de-sac knrnvn as Carolyn Circle, 50 foot right-of--way known as Copeland Drive in its entirety and all public easements located within Block 2, Lots 29 and 30, Block 3, Lots 1 through 4 and Block 1, Lots 26 through 28 shown on the subdivision of Sugarloaf ii Highlands, Section 1 located in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. (Arnold Covey, Director of Engineering & Inspections) 0-52395-14 LBE MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC 2. Ordinance to rezone approximately 2.62 acres from C-2 Conditional to AV in order to operate a contractors' storage yard, located at 7210 Franklin Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Kenneth McNeil. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 0-52395-15 FM MOTION TO ADOPT ORD WITH CONDITIONS CT.A-_RIFIED IN TERRY HARRINGTON MEMO AYES-EGK~LBE,HCN,FM NAYS-BI.~T 3. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to expand Glernar High School, located at 4549 Malus Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of School Board of Roanoke County. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 0-52395-16 EGK MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC 4. Ordinance to rezone approximately 1.9 acres from C-1 to I-2 to construct an office/sales/light manufacturing facility, located adjacent to 3326 West Main Street, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Jerry Mullins. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 0-52395-17 EGK MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC 5. Ordinance to rezone approximately 1.23 acres from C-2 to R-1 to allaw continued use as a single family residence, is located at 123 John Richardson Drive, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Roanoke County Planning Commission. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 0-52395-18 BI{T MOTION TO ADOPT ORD iTU[~ 6. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to construct a broadcast tower atop Read Mountain approximately .4 mile north of Summit Ridge Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Virginia Towers, Inc. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning and Zoning) 0-52395-19 BLOT MOTION TO DENY SPECIAL USE PERMIT AYES-BLJ,HCN,FM NAYS-EGK.LBE 1 CITIZEN SPOKE 7. Ordinance to rezone 5.93 acres of land from EP to AG-3, located at 2393 Hammond Drive, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of the Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) (CONTINUED FROM MARCH 28, 1995) CONTINUED TO 6/13/95 8. Ordinance to rezone 3.06 Acres from I-1 Conditional and C-1 Conditional to C-1 to house administrative offices and church services, located at 5240 Hollins Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Reformation Herald Publishing Association. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) ~CON1'INUED FROM APRIL 25, 19951 0-52395-20 BLOT MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC 13 PLEASE NOTE: THE FOLLOWING REZONING HAS BEEN CONTINUED UNTIL JUNE 27, 1995 Ordinance to rezone approximately 68.4 acres from AG-3 to AR to construct single family detached dwellings, located beyond the terminus of Toddsbury Drive to the east, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of Akfer Corporation. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) U. PUBLIC HEARINGS - (APPROXIMATELY 8:00 P.M.) 1. Public Hearing to elicit comments regarding the Proposed Budget for Fiscal Year 1995-96. 7 CITIZENS SPOKE V. CITIZEN COMI~~NTS AND COMMLTI~TICATIONS NONE W. ADJOI;IRNMENT BLS MOTION TO ADTOURN AT 8:10 P.M. UW 14 ` ~ pOAN ,~,~ a z 1' ~ 2 a ~~~~~ C~~~x~#~ ~# ~n~x~~.~E ROANOKE COiTN'1'Y BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA MAY 23, 1995 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement in order to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings or other programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County, please contact the Clerk to the Board at (703) 772-2005. We request that you provide at least 48- hours notice so that proper arrangements may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: The Reverend Steven W. Harris Baptist Children's Home 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Recognitio^ of Larry A. Logan for his years of service to i ® flecycled Paper 4 the County of Roanoke. D. E. F. G. H. BRIEFINGS NEW BUSINESS 1. Request to implement a study of potential commercial and industrial sites and approval of resolution authorizing a comprehensive rezoning for economic development purposes. (Timothy W.Gubala, Economic Development Director) 2. Request for funding to relocate water line in conjunction with Colonial Avenue road project. (Gary Robertson, Utility Director) 3. Request from Virginia Amateur Sports, Inc. for additional funding of $5,000 for FY 94/95. (Elmer Hodge, County Administrator) 4. Request to approve advance of funds and reimbursement resolution for expenses related to the Joint Sewage Treatment Plant Facility Project. (Diane Hyatt, Finance Director) REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA 1. Ordinance to rezone .84 acre from C-1 to C-2 to operate a karate and fitness studio, located at 5407 Peters Creek Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of a Susan Carol Rolfe and Mark Reinhardt. I. J. 2. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to operate a convenience store and gasoline outlet, located at the corner of Plantation and Hershberger Roads, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Workman Oil Co. 3. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to operate a used car lot, located on the west side of Williamson Road 400 feet north of its intersection with Plymouth Drive, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Shelor, Inc. 4. Ordinance to amend the text of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance to allow manufactured homes in the County's agricultural zoning districts pursuant to Section 15.1-486.4, as amended in the 1995 Legislative Session, upon the petition of the Roanoke County Planning Commission. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance amending Section 17-14 of the Roanoke County Code, Procurement Code, to provide for certain restrictions on contract modifications. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizing the exchange of certain real estate with Frank D. Porter III and Beverly V. Porter, his wife, in connection with the "Longridge" subdivision, and the south loop water transmission line. (Gary Robertson, Utility Director) 2. Ordinance authorizing the donation by lease of office space in the Roanoke County Administration Center to the Friends of the Blue Ridge Parkway. (Elmer C. Hodge, 3 County Administrator) 3. Ordinance declaring several parcels of real estate to be surplus and accepting offers for the sale of same. (Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney) 4. Ordinance authorizing the financing of a local public works improvement, Bonsack Community sewer extension, for Michael Dunn. (Gary Robertson, Utility Director) 5. Ordinance amending and reenacting sections 12-51 Penalties for Parking Violations and 12-52 Parking on Streets and Highways Generally to authorize the enforcement of zoning violations involving the unlawful parking of vehicles by the issuance of parking tickets for such violations (Joseph Obenshain) 6. Ordinance amending and reenacting Article I, Chapter 4 Amusements of the Roanoke County Code to conform this ordinance with state posting regulations for water quality and to provide authority to the Health Director to negotiate recommendations at each swimming pool site on issues related to public health and safety without exercise of regulatory or enforcement powers. (Dr. Margaret L. Rutledge, Director, Alleghany Health District) K. APPOINTMENTS 1. Board of Zoning Appeals 2. Clean Valley Council 3. Fifth Planning District Commission 4. Highway and Transportation Safety Commission 5. Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission 6. Roanoke Valley Regional Cable TV Committee 4 7. Virginia Western Community College Board L. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY TIC BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WII~L BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Approval of Minutes for April 25, 1995. 2. Confirmation of committee appointments to the Board of Zoning Appeals, Clean Valley Council, Fifth Planning District Commission, Highway and Transportation Safety Commission, Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission, and Virginia Western Community College Board. 3. Resolution of Congratulations to Total Action Against Poverty upon their 30th Anniversary. 4. Acceptance of sanitary sewer facilities serving the Orchards - Botetourt South, Section 3. 5. Donation of drainage easements on Lots 6 through 10, Block 1, Section 1, The Gardens of Cotton Hill. 6. Authorization to move forward with "No Charge" Motorola Engineering Study to upgrade 800MHZ radio system. M. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS N. CITIZENS' CONIlVIENTS AND C011~IlVIiJNICATIONS O. REPORTS 5 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Accounts Paid -April 1995 5. Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Irnestment and Portfolio Policy, as of April 30, 1995. 6. Bond Project Status Report 7. Additions to the Secondary System of State Highways Made Effective in April, 1995 8. Statement of Revenues and Expenditures as of April 30, 1995. P. BUDGET WORK SESSION Q. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A R CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION EVENING SESSION S. PROCIAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Resolution of Congratulations to Oak Grove Elementary School Parent-Teacher Association for receiving the State Award from the National PTA. 6 T. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance vacating a portion of 50 foot right-of--way and temporary cul-de-sac known as Carolyn Circle, 50 foot right-of--way known as Copeland Drive in its entirety and all public easements located within Block 2, Lots 29 and 30, Block 3, Lots 1 through 4 and Block 1, Lots 26 through 28 shown on the subdivision of Sugarloaf Highlands, Section 1 located in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. (Arnold Covey, Director of Engineering & Inspections) 2. Ordinance to rezone approximately 2.62 acres from C-2 Conditional to AV in order to operate a contractors' storage yard, located at 7210 Franklin Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Kenneth McNeil. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 3. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to expand Glenvar High School, located at 4549 Malus Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of School Board of Roanoke County. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 4. Ordinance to rezone approximately 1.9 acres from C-1 to I-2 to construct an office/sales/light manufacturing facility, located adjacent to 3326 West Main Street, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Jerry Mullins. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 5. Ordinance to rezone approximately 1.23 acres from C-2 to R-1 to allow continued use as a single family residence, located at 123 John Richardson Drive, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Roanoke County Planning Commission. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 6. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to construct a broadcast tower atop Read Mountain approximately .4 mile north of Summit Ridge Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Virginia Towers, Inc. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning and Zoning) 7. Ordinance to rezone 5.93 acres of land from EP to AG-3, located at 2393 Hammond Drive, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of the Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) (CONTINUED FROM MARCH 28, 1995) 8. Ordinance to rezone 3.06 Acres from I-1 Conditional and C-1 Conditional to C-1 to house administrative offices and church services, located at 5240 Hollins Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Reformation Herald Publishing Association. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) (CONTINUED FROM .APRIL 25, 1995) PLEASE NOTE: THE FOLLOWING REZONING HAS BEEN CONTINUED UNTIL TUNE 27, 1995 Ordinance to rezone approximately 68.4 acres from AG-3 to AR to construct single family detached dwellings, located beyond the terminus of Toddsbury Drive to the east, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of Akfer Corporation. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) U. PUBLIC HEARINGS - (APPROXIMATELY 8:00 P.M.) 1. Public Hearing to elicit comments regarding the Proposed Budget for Fiscal Year 1995-96. V. CITIZEN COMI~~NTS AND COD~IlViUNICATIONS W. ADJOtifRNMENT s ACTION NO. / ITEM NUMBER ~ _ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 23, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Recognition of Larry Logan for his service to Roanoke County COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Former Deputy Fire Chief Larry Logan recently resigned to accept a position in the private sector. While he is not eligible for retirement, he was employed by Roanoke County for over 27 years, and it was felt that he should be recognized for his valuable contributions, especially during recent natural disasters such as the 1985 flood, the hurricane and recent ice stor~is . A Certificate of Recognition will be presented to Mr. Logan at the meeting. Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Ref erred ( ) Kohinke To ( ) Minnix ___ Nickens /I „n. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 23, 1995 RESOLUTION 52395-1 AUTHORIZING A COMPREHENSIVE REZONING OF VARIOUS PARCELS FOR COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL USE WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors have authorized the preparation of a study of potential commercial and industrial sites in Roanoke County at their January 20, 1995, strategic planning meeting; and, WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County has conducted a study of vacant land in Roanoke County and has determined that various parcels should be rezoned for commercial or industrial use; and, WHEREAS, one of the purposes of a zoning ordinance is to encourage economic development activities that provide desirable employment and enlarge the tax base; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors desires that the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County serve as its agent to amend the zoning district maps to implement the purposes of the zoning study; and, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County that the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County (IDA) finalize the list of properties to be rezoned and make application for amendments to the zoning district maps on its behalf. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to approve the study and adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: Supervisor Eddy A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Al en, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Timothy W. Gubala, Director, Economic Development Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Item No. ~- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: May 23, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Study of potential commercial and industrial sites in Roanoke County and recommendation for a comprehensive rezoning for economic development purposes COIINTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: We would likt to begin the rezoning of the parcels identified in this report with the understanding that some of them may be eliminated during the process. We have spoken with the property owners, but have not be able to speak to the adjacent owners which will be done during the rezoning process. We may also find that certain parcels are less desirable than we originally anticipated. Recommend going forward because there is a need to prepare suitable land for development and to preserve it before it's used in other ways. BACRGROIIND: Economic Development staff reported at the January 20, 1995, Board of Supervisors Strategic Planning meeting that there is a shortage of industrial and commercial sites. The 1994 Economic Development Activity report indicates a lack of commercial sites in the I-81 Corridor and a shortage of industrial sites in the 26-50 acre and 51-100 acre category. The year 1994 marked successful business and industrial locations and expansions in Roanoke County that diminished the industrial site inventory. There is continual demand from commercial prospects for large acreage sites and for sites in the Tanglewood Mall area and at I-81 interchanges. The present inventory and quality of commercial sites is not sufficient to meet the demand. The Economic Development Department proposes that the study of commercial and industrial sites initiated after the Board's January 20 meeting be implemented by a comprehensive rezoning. There are currently 43 parcels of approximately 955 acres proposed for rezoning action. Staff proposes that the Roanoke County Industrial Development Authority (IDA) serve as the agent of the Board of Supervisors to finalize the list of properties, make application for rezoning, and to present the study to the Planning Commission and public. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are available in the Economic Development Department budget for compensation of Roanoke County Industrial Development Authority members for this project (estimated at $2,000). ~~ ALTERNATIVES: 1. Implement the rezoning study and rezone additional sites for commercial and industrial use 2. Delay rezoning until after the update of the 1985 Comprehensive Plan 3. Take no action. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors select Alternative #1 and approve the attached resolution. Respectfully submitted: i~ ~, .~~~ Timothy W. Gubala, Director Department of Economic Development ACTION Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: Approved: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens No Yes Abs Attachment 1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 23, 1995 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A COMPREHENSIVE REZONING OF VARIOUS PARCELS FOR COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL USE WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors have authorized the preparation of a study of potential commercial and industrial sites in Roanoke County at their January 20, 1995, strategic planning meeting; and, WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County has conducted a study of vacant land in Roanoke County and has determined that various parcels should be rezoned for commercial or industrial use; and, WHEREAS, one of the purposes of a zoning ordinance is to encourage economic development activities that provide desirable employment and enlarge the tax base; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors desires that the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County serve as its agent to amend the zoning district maps to implement the purposes of the zoning study; and, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County that the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County (IDA) finalize the list of properties to be rezoned and make application for amendments to the zoning district maps on its behalf. ~~ Rezoning Study for Roanoke County Board of Supervisors --+-a --- Prepared by Roanoke County Department of Economic Development and Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia May 16, 1995 L-..- I A rezoning study of potential commercial and industrial sites was initiated after the Board of Supervisors' strategic planning session January 20, 1995. The study focused on evaluating sites that have large acreage, access to public roads and utilities, and proximity to other development areas. The Roanoke County Planning Commission has been briefed by staff and the Roanoke Valley Economic Development Partnership on the purposes of the rezoning study and the need for additional land, zoned appropriately. The Planning and Zoning Department has indicated that the timing of the study and the number of parcels being rezoned may conflict with other projects (visioning) that are currently ongoing. The Economic Development staff identified a number of properties for study. Letters were sent to thirty (30) property owners representing one hundred twenty-three (123) separate parcels. The intent was to ascertain the owner's plans for the property and to advise them on the feasibility and potential for a commercial or industrial use. Follow-up contact was initiated to discuss the property and to present a scenario for rezoning. A survey was conducted with area commercial and industrial realtors to verify the present and future market demand for commercial and industrial properties in different areas of the County. i ~- i Most property owners contacted were interested. Some had questions about the effect of a rezoning on taxes. The County Assessor assisted by advising several property owners about the effects of a rezoning on current assessments. The staff made an effort to obtain the support of property owners for the rezoning. Currently, 43 parcels of approximately 955 acres are proposed for rezoning action. Several additional property owners will clarify their position on rezoning prior to the application being filed with the Planning and Zoning Department. The proposed rezonings will create a reserve of industrial zoned properties. These properties can be marketed for large acreage industrial users. Planning for extensions of public water and sewer, road improvements, and stormwater management can occur within the context of the Comprehensive Plan update and annual review of the County Capital Improvement Plan. A significant improvement will be made to the commercial sites inventory that will create larger acreage sites in the I-81 interchange areas in the Tanglewood Mall market area and along corridors such as Peters Creek Road and Route 460 East. The proposed sites are listed briefly and shown on attached maps. a ~- i COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES -~ Commercial Properties Hollins/Plantation Road (38.16-1-3.1, parcel and 38.16-1-3, parcel) Parcels are part of the Hinman Estate. Several site visits and discussions with the family members and trust officers indicate a desire to rezone amulti-family site at the intersection of Hollins/Plantation Road to commercial. Two other zoning district map adjustments are proposed to better define future property use zoned commercial and industrial. Peters Creek Corridor (27.13-5-5,6) Two parcels are proposed to be rezoned from multi-family to commercial office to add to adjacent tracts zoned commercial (C-1). This will create a larger commercial office area for marketing the Peters Creek Corridor. I-81 Exit ,Wildwood Road (44.04-1-7,12) Two parcels of vacant land are proposed to be rezoned from agricultural to commercial (C-2). Property frontage on Skyview Road and Wildwood Road. I-81, Exit 140 (35.04-1-54) A 9.49 acre site fronts on Edgewood Road visible from I-81. There is a deficiency of commercial zoned sites at I-81 interchanges in Roanoke County. I-81 Hanging Rock (36.10-1-4,5,6,7,8,9,12,15; 36.01-3-1) The Hanging Rock area has received recent attention due to the pending ISTEA application for the Hanging Rock Battlefield and "Rails to Trails" 3 ~-~ project. Rezoning of small parcels to commercial will assist landowners to change the appearance of the area and to allow the Battlefield project to develop. A large acreage tract with interstate visibility should be rezoned from residential to commercial use (C-2). Tanglewood Mall area (77.15-1-12,113,14,15,16; 77.19-1-1,2,3,4) Vacant commercial land in the Tanglewood Mall area is non-existent. Two tracts of small acreage parcels on Ogden Road can be combined to make a large commercial (C-2) parcel that can be jointly planned and developed. Topography buffers the site from adjacent single family residential uses. Starkey Road (87.11-1-15) A minor map amendment could move the C-1 zoning line to follow the property line adjacent to Hunting Hills golf course. Blue Ridge Parkway This is the prime site selected by the National Park Service for a Roanoke area visitors center in the 1991 Environmental Assessment for Roanke River Parkway. The owner of the property has proposed that an orientation/ interpretation center, folk art center and restaurant be developed as part of a Phase I project. Rezoning from AG-3 to AV will allow planning to continue to develop the concept. 4 ~~ Route 460 East (50.01-5,5.2,5.3) Fralin and Waldron participated in a County initiated rezoning in 1990 that reserved 105+ acre property for industrial use. The site has been marketed to large industrial prospects. Development of the industrial site is dependent upon the development of the frontage as commercial. Recent out-of-area commercial inquiries reflect an interest in planned large acreage sites in East County. The frontage of the site is proposed to be enlarged and rezoned from I-1 to C-2. 5 Vicinity Map CIT OF RnA OKI v~ 0 O ~~ I S • : o'er ,awe,.. c., c. S •69 k ~~ .~ \ 62 ~c 6~ ~~~ ., b~~ r y\~ 1 ~\ •. 4, 32 ' p ~ ^ r ~ ? 2A~n< ~ r 1 ~f e O~ r~~ ~ 4i ~~ 3.3 ~oim / d C2 e~ .,- '~~~ 13 '~ / Ouc d~ •' ~1 ~ \\ G2 °p~ke ~ ~~ \\ \\~ Tax Map Numbers: Request: 38.16-1-3.1 (pt) Rezone I-1 to C-2 7.0 (A) 38.16-1-3.1 (pt) Rezone C-2C to I-1 1.0 (A) 38.16-1-3 (pt) Rezone R-3 to C-2 18.5 r RMOUN ~y~ ^ 0°~00~ F~I~ EFs-, pa Q ao Site name: ~ L~ NE ~* ~,~~~ ~' P ENO ~ ~ s°ua X10 ' ~ s ~ ~ ~ o~~ 4z ~O ' ~. o? q ~ N a ' Peters Creek Corridor C j `' T NMpJ. ~ ? , S N My "`f" I,a m °w.~ oA DwLLS\~, ,Q ~ 0 35 w~a~i' ~ .sai. Noan+ ' ~~ ~~~ P 115 ~ ? RgY ~ 17 d e~ P~H °"'ci s?f •co`' ~'.r~,pii NOR o Car I ~?~ R I NGTQ c.tKEVrt w .. 99 ~ BAH ~~, > MANOF~)(~ S~• C~~ ` bb ~/ ' ~ , / `, I• 6 ~~ ~ `, ~ ' a . \27 ~. 19 ~ / . , ~• 20 0 ' . ; • ~' 2 i ~{ 24 ~ \ 26 ' \ ,\ 23 \ ~~y a •• \ / \ / / ~Q 0• Mj° 49 1, , ' , I r 8 34 •i,~ ~` • o iR00 aA. 3 230 ~c ~~'•~ .0~9 ,\'~4 b' \• J6 ~~~r `~(a r~ aPz\e~s / ~ a~ A ,~ z4 5\ i~ ~•, r.~\~ ., ~6ad ~ti, ~ \ ~a~ II r •o ~ \ \~ \ \ \ \ \ 3 \ \ \ \ \ ~. w aw w I \ \ \\ 3a~ \ \ \ 5 \ ~ ' ego '-~ \\ \ \\ \ \\ \ 6 \ 3 ~~ \ \ \ \ \ 6 K \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ~ ~ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 4 \ \ \ \ \ P .le 9 I \ \\ \ \ \ \ 1.68 0c. \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ P/0 27.1-4-13 \ \ 1•• 100 \ \ \ 2 \ \ \ ~p r \ \ \ 0~' \ \ \ \ 94'`\c4`oc \ \ ,i \ \ .. Tax Map Numbers: Request: 27.13-5-5 Rezone R-3 to C-1 6.66 27.13-5-6 Rezone R-3 to C-1 5.00 / % Q' ~v 71 V 755 Site name: ~ - E~~P pfd ~ -- -"` I s - -- =N o ~- I-81 Exit WF,~ 'Y~.'~ ,PQ . OGq v ti ,Q~ A~ ri ~ V epOGP ~~ _-~Q~~~ORUTp)N NOLlDAY INN S~~V1EW -~RVIEW ~ UN'~~ rr - J 'M CFO ~` ~~ t J NA KISK ~ yrNDA~ ~ARCISSU AZA 5' ~ p SAL RD. ~ p^xiE tf+~N~ ~, 9~X/ BURMA c ~ A H HTC S _v ~~''~~ ~~ ~.1 S~, i 0..SAMYIEC `-L .MURREE` ) ONC''l' ~ AV e ~ ~ a • anac llo •a, 3 q ~~o ul .c ~ yria .. b 17 - ? xh t 3 +~ ~ 1 6 1 b 1 ,7 i ~ }salt r9~i ~ a:ilc •• !K ..,/ 262 4 ~ 11 8 lr•r t2 .• Al _~. t 19 .. ~ 34 ~ L~ 20 rl,o n. 7a~ •e tot ]olcm) ~i6r 6 ]] •c ICI )]9AC1C1 «wr I rnl 33J rlu 22 I.0 •c ~ 1091c \ r71~ 9.1 c ~ / ~ 1 7 JNl 23 9 1c rnl LJilc \ i ,~33 ,~.' ~ an• / 33 ~ N r71• I i.89 lc a ° i7~r CN ° 32 ~ 2 e~3~ z.w 14 I.o 4. ~~ 32J rrn` , t1~ 372 Jrrr 37 ~ ~' 2171c ~ i ~ ~Q ac t i 27 6,c! =T71 3Er et 39 tu4< s,. ^ ~ ~ . ~, Isoac Ke c~ N Rd° 2.0 ~ ~4 ~ - rf •~o 43 »s rr 1-95 k S k 3 W 44 z.ok e~ v 1N 45 471 la]gc •46 7.58 ac °i a~ _ 32 ~ 6 ~ o° ~ aez .a°) wn ~ ~ 3.Tf ~clC) \~ )~) _ ~!\ ~ $~ ~ ~/~ Z' ~i c1 ~ ~ ~°`~ \ i Tax Map Numbers: Request: 44.04-1-7 Rezone AG-1 to C-2 7.22 44.04-1-12 Rezone AG-1 to C-2 3.95 13 n:>s ~ ~ -1 ~l 1 AGI~ 9 ~ B I.?7 k ~~ ~o O X~ ~_~~~-~`~ ~9, ` ~ Site name: j ~ 1 ~ li`S ~ S. ~ OO MAY SA_C I~ pNE E ~jL ` ~OS -,~N? ~,~, -` ~ {/`~'•.~./ ' ~ f'1 ~' ~~ 1. ~ ROAb'OK= ' CDLL£GC 1 Brp ~~ / I-81 Exit 140 7 ~ ~' ~ HANGIN,, ROCK lT1 GOLF[OL'RSE~ O i 1NVESTMENT CORP. NANG . ~~ ~° Q 733 y/ CLUa ous ING RGCK EDGE~` I C< ~ 705 ~'-rL.QUCrs GG,LF ` i ~, CO ~ ljt i ~ ff7MMING DEHNI Ccua ' ~ " 'u, k'OpQ ay~ ~ ,l~ , ~ _, e' • h Sio \ ~ q war~ HEtJ '.9ER ~ x 6~~0 ~~ ~' ,l . II ~ \..:~~ 60 7.2J AC l01 631 ACICl C ~ o • 9 t ~pao I ~ (us! IS ! 9 , Isa i • t• t}• • • ly ~ • •e Ac 7 ' 1 '..22 M.I I lsaa • ~ 't•7 • . 24 ' • t (ff t• d • t~ ~ A 27 ( ~-- s • \ t• t py 28 ~ Ila3 IL77Ac fDl t t! b I !J' • Ipt t t ' G90Ac lG 32 ~ Ilta ~ , t g ~ 31 ]t t t n , 18 ~ , t a e te]o ~ ) LgAe f ~ O I 30 • t30 ~ ( 1 1 ? Ise. Iis ~ ~ e• , ~ pD0 Ac ~ tf o 29 t(f / 20+g ~ Iie 1 , 1A ~ /22 I(l! Ir ••tf Vpt f .P 2.21 K/ 44 . 2fli '/~ Is. r/ ( d I(eJ lt3 ac 1a~ ~ ft~ / 54Q ~ r / S3 tf ~ i 17 ~. t I q p:4 ml 47 e.a xIG ~... .-.-.e .I 45 3304 e / ° w.• 7.1]AC ~ A r ~~a 34 ~ , j H, q00 AC lD1 ~ 26J AC IDI ~ ' I~ 60.1 It.s..f~la ~Sp . ~ZzoACo ~ 1 3611 Ac 1.64 Ae ml ~ - 0 • ~ I .I ° 37 1.90AC Cl 3S 2 uic IDI ° ~ I ~ IJt 36 2004c "- ' I T,AC lG W ~ ~ ,.t I , 52 _ ' S4 LOOACIDI 1 E ~ <0 ~ 2.77 AC Ijj1 , S3 a32 Ay lG ` u u a2 a 52 `` a / ~ r -'•2.wAC lDI ° ~ \ 11{AC 2b4 AC Ius 48 coVO i v ~ 2. loot \ o ~ LDD AC IDI( ,~ ,Si IC ~ \ y' ' p 46 NC aB1 A lgnclDl IG a 27 4 ~ ~• 57 opd O ... 1.27 A[ID7 V7 ~c 9 . f•°• 12.641.(! Ippk OOtC 1 . •, p • •~ • AcCI • ` E 1150 , • 43 - 44 47 R1. 59 lase 1184 / .aae CoVa ,f • • ~ ~ ~ ~ 44< 23 ~ laar ,,'~ 74 75 u14 -6D 7 ° r.e. . 2H4 rl J1J ~ .• ~ Ue1 RL 1112 •nnif Lpnt ~ LIB AC Ir9a a 56 e r ~, 62 71 69 67 Ias It9p 63 ` L•AAC Il • 2884 ee ~r164 ~ ~ 68 It~(~ , It(9 Qt6AC -~ f 1.02 Ac Tax Map Numbers: Request: 35.04-1-54 Rezone R-1 to C-2 9.49 ..vwJ n+Ea - - .`t` ~ -- _ ME~i OwwO h~~. ~~ a e o D ~o. • EsTarES Site name: p ~ ~~ ~'- J o~`' - ~-l o~ ~''~ v w o~ ,,.9 ~ ~~- I$1, Hanging Rock •ouau GLEN CO INN ~aENCOVE 1 ~. O E(~Y. SGN. R_ ~ •J100 'y~i '~y •. ~ n MONTCIAIR ff~('Jp Tax Map Numbers: Request: 36.01-3-1 Rezone AG-1/R-1 to C-2 42.58 ~ ~u~~.wooo. e 0 Site name: I-81, Hanging Rock -~ ii V s.. Y.v se.a P• zoo' ~,,, ' I,.I A ~ . 9, ~~ i 3~i ~ i s /1~ / ~ ~ i ~ ~ nta• ~ e ~ - ~ 8g9 He / i'ce' ~ a~ ° i v L 9 b / i° Arco ~\ 1 ID1A/ ~C ~y ~ C~ O ~ ~. ~~~/// ` ` ° Merrft 11 ``~~~ - ~I•cl~re -- ~ • 3 "+i ,y ~+ 17 // Z.BJ~c // I 2 ~~•. ~j l o ~.. ' y, // 9 / Y° polar Un.NO piy+r~• N /M Car/M~°q 6DO~c s~o ~ 0 s v \ZO O `. Tax Map Numbers: Request: 36.10-1-12 Rezone AR to C-2 2.05 36.10-1-4 Rezone AR to C-2 .5 (A) 36.10-1-5 Rezone AR to C-2 .1 A 36.10-1-6 Rezone AR to C-2 .2 (A) 36.10-1-8 Rezone R-1 to C-2 .3 (A) 36.10-1-9 Rezone R-1 to C-2 .5 (A) 36.10-1-15 AG-1(R) to C-2 2.02 v ~ ~at4 -~ 1 ?e ~~ ~y' Q. , Site name: 1~ d pfNP ~ t ~ Rff r ~444QE' ~ \\\\\\ P . tL ~y~. Tf QWV ~ \ S~RNNG Cy WW`rr_'. \ `' s Tanglewood Mall area Cav~Sprin~ P?`~~;_ ° o o'AW! ~, Laa e,een n ~ A ~ ~?1• p~`'\\ o ~ N ~" GEHI,~,~¢ I ~-1 E~em ~`ntESU ~S~a ~ ES t~ 'F` O ~i 0~2- ~ p SpP oQG 1 Q.~~' 4 _ ~ / C S~JP P ~S~V'~ R PaRx t\ Cq ~0~. ~~\•S o- 4i ~' ~,q, CR EST. '. \ PO (~ T~ .J ,Cv .k- OUOA \ F, P Q' INN CY Pp(a( ; \ t~ ~ .~P o.NQ ANG[f-~ ~ p x/409 c^p 2 ~J l~~_ .~ ~ ~~ wOOO ~~ - s A S -- -' Tax Map Numbers: Request: 77.15-1-12 Rezone R-3 to C-2 1.32 77.15-1-13 Rezone R-3 to C-2 1. (A) 77.15-1-14 Rezone R-3 to C-2 .5 (A) 77.15-1-15 Rezone R-3 to C-2 1. (A) 77.15-1-16 Rezone R-3 to C-2 1.02 - 0" `r M~~ ~ ~ ~r'C' tinemorb `9 ~QL1L a E x ~T i o ~t ~~ - Site name: v °~`~°! =mot ..~OEH ~ `. 2 0°.0~. ~ t~"A poa o~ EC r~~~'';'' ~ ~ O ?r ?rO~ v y~ ~ ~. Cn~ o~ ~~w.f4~ ~ 4~ ~ ~ ~Q ~ ~ o-0 Tanglewood Mall area LC'- .` ~o- ,r ~' PfHP ~ E.yr. X51, o sROaN e . E., cy r p>„~ttt 'off ~~`l- ~ \ NUR ttlL W~ PAS QW ~ ~~ P O °' e S o'aw~ 4 Cav ~prinQ' n ~ ~P~~~`~~y?_ ~ £~ N ao GEHI.~,t,~ a Teen er ~ ~ G`.- ~~ ~ O ~ ~ ~,P~p. ~ E .moo J "' AlESLI p S 9 La O i i/taoo~ 4~ - ZQ~ L ~ e p d q ~ _ t+~0! , 0 y~' .I ..JP :. P iS~,o`~e- FL4 '~\ C~i- P'/ .~.~% ~~ 3~E,~ d,f ~~a 9r ? ~~~~ P t/ • ~ ST ART RD ~ ~ s FA E5~ Site name: ~ J` Jp~. p\~ ~~ ~o-~ aro E Efts ~ i ~ P Z '~ olss 9,~ ~~s yi 6 e~S ~~~ M E ° Starkey Road ~'^ `? °° ~' ~ ONEN ~ ~ ~G~i ~P ~ ~~ roi, \ /-~ .... `'J~ ° `~ OlD ROQ OAK ~ c ~ .1 nCK ~' ° 0 ~ F a~V' ° u 4y~ \~ 0 9 q ~'EPR a ~~1'`'J ~ =o ~ NT/NC 1400 d. ~ R~ s-i -y ` Sua `~ Q Pp I ~O p II ~ 21 ] oo Ac 20 9~ s '"/rt° Jr ~ . IB ~ 19 Lm ac col 9s A~~u \'. / rl~e nw Cm..no+ ~ P ~ \ Aiw 31 ~ ~ ~ r ~ v .~ _ ~G, Qa. ~ a ~ „2B' n ti ••. n. I Ar ~ ~,•• 1~ p. ~ ~ ,. •µ Z „o, I ~ ., ~4 \~ s 1 ~ 1 C ~ lorrcq S0~ ~ S "~ \ / ..[, ~ 2 PRa~ 7T0~[I H» \ lOa A< ^\/VI b.[ \ ~ Rr 6.33 q~ 9.~a a< O 1 saa I c.16 ac ~ I .>+• v ~O+j ¢° / sa[~ 7. in so•s 8 I • lM Ac >ro0 Aalor Avg. y~ w I _ u qOO It sar 2 w a i '° ~ r m n B srr +.• ~ e ~ • ~ ~.p b ' w 13 14 w[si I a II 12 \\ ~ 3 [ T 3 b 6 I ui ~ r~ II I ~s Y S L I 4 sis ~p• ssm sz [~ s[sx ss>. s:u seas esoa ssw sssa IT I O. q rO ~ AI. T91 Eden Are. sos ~ -. I ~• ,n, ._ .. .,. ... ._ ... _. .,.. Tax Map Numbers: Request: 87.11-1-15 R-2 to C-1 1.00 (A) ~ 3" ' ~ `~ oMONTGOMERY R~ ~ M p DR'vILLAGE „~ ~.~. ~'~1 ~~ l Site name: x loo 0 l ~.~ _ ~''~ --,.'<.~._.~ ,. e q Blue Ridge Parkway ~-- ~ ~; ti H x1160 'QF FIRE ;'rq' _ ~ BED + ~ j x75 ~~4EA NpRI p EXPLORE ~ ) p 4'` E ~MTIO <' ~1115NIAGAR 'A ~\ PARK i/ 9Z ~ t~ I ~~ OR~ ` R looo PLORE G(,c- _ Tax Map Numbers: Request: 71.00-1-1 Rezone AG-3 to A-V 88.53 ~ ~G9iJ~ ~~ ~ .~TQ '6os Ro Site name: o e 'e 60 'QO ~~ P 610 ~ ' 03 ~ 9 Route 460 East Corridor F ~ yOti c 9 ~ 9 V~ 0 - COLS ~ p:~TRAI' R 4 4j ' ~ ROAN CE R.. FOR , KC ' 7R ~ */.:EO _DUS~Y_"~!`':::, 1 RFtADMTN~J' / I • .v v •q 2.3 Igac ~1 ~ 2.1 '1~ 1.]I ae s 9 ]3 ~c G e.9] a<. Rt f003 n ~ Lib ~~eY-0-N7M1~ \1 o~l~. n ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ,, i ~ /))17 AC ~ -mac .= e g J]e ac LOOac 164 1.00 ac 1. n /~ 27 ~}. ` r" qi) ~ I ~~ ]Wac f P 27 / // / 1 J 6 )~ ~'~ La3ac / ~ >,st ))) `27 ' 1]2 acl Dl 190 ac10 ]OI ac ICI N i ~ O ~jJl ac /7" /y a .,.,, ~ ~ ` ~, ~ ~ 21 ~'' ~ l ~~ 3 ' ` 2l.I I.D4 • / ~ )i)> v ~` =I ° ~ ` ~ • At Vie, ~~'• ~ - ' ~ II ~ p f ~ ` :~ 17<~ 1 4 ~ ~~ k / • - - , x ° ~ ~..CO, • E Tax Map Numbers: Request: 50.01-1-5 (pt) Rezone I-1 to C-2 22.59 50.01-1-5.2 Rezone C-1 to C-2 2.77 50.01-1-5.3 Rezone C-1 to C-2 1.0 L~/ INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES ~/ F Industrial Properties I-81 Industrial Site (63.04-1-8) A vacant residential zoned tract with overhead KV138 transmission lines is more suitable for industrial uses. The property fronts on I-81 and is served by a state secondary road. Valley TechPark (64.02-2-50, parcel; 64,02-2-9, parcel) Two rezoning actions are needed. The IDA acquired property from Bruce Hill at the entrance of the industrial park. This property should be rezoned from residential to industrial as Mr. Hill has relocated and his house is demolished. A tract of land owned by Helen C. Richards adjoins Valley TechPark. The current zoning, C-1, boundary line should be moved to the creek rather than the property line to allow for additional buffer and future expansion of Valley TechPark. I-81 Industrial Site A large vacant 460+ acre site in single ownership lies north of I-81 in a sparsely developed area of west County. The site will be accessed by the northern (water) transmission line. Sewer is planned off-site at Route 11/460 and the property abuts a potential I-81 interchange site. The property should be rezoned and preserved for future industrial use. West County Rail Site (73.00-1-4.5) APCO owns several large tracts of land in western Roanoke County that "protect" transmission line corridors or provide buffers around transformer sites/stations. APCO is evaluating property 6 ^~ ownership to determine any surplus property. One site of 80+ acres has future potential as an industrial site with access to rail. This site should be rezoned from A-R to I-1 and reserved for future use. Old Mountain Road (28.00-1-7, 28.03-1-22,23,24,25 A large tract of vacant land is located near Read Mountain. Adjacent property is zoned industrial or devoted to that use (Ingersoll-Rand). Discussions with the property owners indicate a willingness to have 154± acres made available for future industrial use. The property is in a trust and is currently used for agricultural purposes. Rezoning from R-1 and R-2 to I-1 will reserve this acreage for future industrial use. = U ~ ,~soo ' 1 aM R0 ~ z Site name: ^~ ~ o L f .O ~ ~ ' ~,EP~ 910 w °~ • . o ~'Q ~. 92 i ~ /fV~ ( ' ~ ~~ I-81 Industrial Site OG ~~ ' O ~ ° ( IPA _2~~,f _ _J` a I t i ' I ~~ i ~'1 ~ .. •`OG / ``'• x1667 ~ RIVEF .~~, „ 1 .`N ~ / ~~I Tax Map Numbers: Request: 63.04-1-8 Rezone AR to I-1 38.35 ~', ~1•SY" "~ '~ Site name: ~NVAR M7$. ~ ~ ~'M ~ ~ ~ ~Z_ \ D,IN q ~ ~«. o. ~ ~GIFNVAR T 61 ~~ ~ Oa N `~ ~3. aA ~~ Valley TechPark .ax q pNPpO \ o ; ' 646. e b n1 1 y i ~ nch ,y ° IA, ntt na_^~ -+ ~ _; , m, ~~ ~~ z i ~/ ALE OR. 710 ___r ~ \\ ~J~.C . ~~ f l ~ l~,Y . y r -_ - t t _ / _ /' ~- / ~ _ id / ~' ~ ~ / S •V u., Z 92 R - / + 1.4 . . Al / .~ ~. . 8~ _ ~ ~ 1 7 _ 1~O ]zLC ViIIIY•f• 4!! ¢ ~ ~ ~ I O Lo ; / 9 0.1 4 Ilp ,;;';~ ~~~.~ ~ . z.aoA~lo1 ]9iA~ „ is~s~ - ~~ O rwAClu _ y~~^ I.a. "'° a I~Ie ~+IO p ]1 4 O 7~ ~~. 'zklol !1. al II Zp'~ ICl ~ L78Ac {.7D Ac ~ Aw.irr~I a...,AOry d ,~, 7 ~ ~ e.n y..o s«I a ~. 710 3 0~ ` ~» ~ ~ 32131 v~ ~~ z8 ~ 7.98 Ac 2 ~ y~sf (71.16 AC 46 47 s1i~ 4B / 179AC L!!AC 1.fl A< j / 1 1 >' Tax Map Numbers: Request: 64.02-2-50 pt Rezone R-1 to I-2 1.0 (A) 64.02-2-9 pt Rezone C-1 to I-26.00 (A) Q Site name: r \ r .raoo ~ 9 I-81 Industrial Site ~ 9~ x569. 9 _ ~ 6, G ~ c_~ p~rh . ti~ I300r ~~ ate ~j •1400 i % er 661 ~ ti i ~ .9 ~ Eo~o9 ~ ~ \~ 1130 Vicinity Map Tax Map Numbers: Request: 54.00-1-2 Rezone R-1 to I-1 308.89 54.00-1-3 Rezone R-1 to I-1 73.60 P ~9p; ~92 -~ Site name: ~`, / \ / ~ C'ollehen w~.. rl r ./400 _ p I I-81 Industrial Site 9~ 1569. 'O pG .._~ t_, B av~~j . 1300x ~~ ate •/400 ~ ' % ~ ~ N 1 \~ p G eo~~1Oeo I \ I (. V 1"0 iosot~4 ~ a°4~ ' 4 1 ~ c n enoTj 0 c, xae a ,. . Tax Map Numbers: Request: 64.00-1-1 Rezone R-1 to I-1 74.40 69.00-1-4 Rezone R-1 to I-1 5.05 r c 0 o~ Pt• ~. i ~ a.. wo s4.os I•• xoo' s ~4e `+~q Rtrv RI W~l1 ~~I f 1 ]]~714 f ,~.o ,, ~ ! "' .S! ICI ~ 1 ~/ ~ 'New ? ~ ~ _ •II l/ ~0 SO.SI AC ~~ \ _ 63 Aclpl !1 q.61 ac10 6EJ• ~!»~ I13AC0 6b2 I = B F I 4 !ate 4 I 75f ~ AP / / 1 ~ss~ S.OOS ml 44 4S NN Ors \ .0 74 l74s ~ 4 KV qN 2474 Ac lDl Sg / ~ . ~' 19.11 1 y/~ \ )IO it ISM .+•• 1452 45 6794 AC (DI ]]224 ~~ ~ ~ SO C9 Ac CI ~. ~ ~ / l ~ I >~ 42 ; • PCo ~ I / ~ 2964 I I \ \ 1 ~4f I 1.74 A: \~~ ~` / 41 41.1 ~' e I-~9 fio ~ ~ ~ ~'~ 10404 ~ 02 SZ AC101 124 3 7717 AC IC1 R APCa w r 39 q9 76AC c.-.. 3B T ~ 712 ACI0t o IO 124[ KI un ~ z 4ooe of sol• 2]O AClC1 G\~I\ 4o~f a ~ ~~ ~eti~ \~~ 9 IC;` /ooo JW APfn. • G 8 2.504lDI 3S r so.. 1.9041C1 I P(n 34 Q 849 50 00 4 H1 ~ ~ 3rcor! I ~ b ~ 64 \ A PCa ~ ~ 4604 \/\) 13.554 .. 804 soaf \ 61 ~ ` 00 Ac 1` ~~~ 9otff ~}~ 7tI 2. SBAC ~. ~ _ 122 ~ ~ I/Jl ~ 1.63d \ 4S1/ 14.1 .6611[ ~ f1(ft I \ `~ ie 2S L4 I II 4 ,.. N77 I ~ I\ I A PG. /, ~ W 69Ae 2.M4a -- - __-_ -1__ ~,., ~ ~ LW4m1 Tax Map Numbers: Request: 73.00-1-4 Rezone AR to I-1 80.27 i ,~ ,~ ~ ~ ~ , ` -Ts`'4''~ ~ Site name: .q _ ~ ~-~ SUM A ~ NS AEf I 1280 605 _Q% j '~JjL-_ Old Mountain Road o ~ Qp. ~ Qq ;~ 1a I 93 BUR ~ cp ~ Q: H G '" ° ROANOKE ~ C L ' ,~~° j • 1600 4y ~ MO~~ A!N i ~; 621 p- ~ v • ELEM.SC1i ~.I1~~q, _ -....y - Tax Map Numbers: 28.03-1-22 28.03-1-23 28.03-1-24 28.03-1-25 Request: Rezone R-1 to I-1 56.43 Rezone R-1 to I-1 4.46 Rezone R-1 to I-1 2.28 Rezone R-1 to I-1 68.95 Rt 605 \p~P \ Rpp~ p4r~ ~0,~. P See Map 2901 :.re •.+ f.r~r•wn I' • 200' ~ -"r CaM / OY Jt ~~ 2 See Mao ~~ ~ •0.01.\~~\ ~ ''z~s 29 01 ~ \ 3 1 6 ~ _ 4.1 ~ Lam, 0J ~ - `rz.y I \ ~~\` ~ / 10 61 e0v~ \. ~ _` _ \\ ~\ $ee MoD $ee Map 2fl 29 OS I•• 200' s.. u.: \~ • 200' ~ .ew ~ zoo ~ 6 ~ 50 5 :~ \ / , ea MaD 2903 I'• 200' \- ~\~ \CBt 61 r. ••. Sett ezn \Cr rrr•. ~ee+l Cpv ~+ n/ pV''j' See Mop 2903 \ I"• 200' 9 9 X1.004 260 Ac:01 ...\ M1 2B x.21 A< kl -~... / \ / \ Tax Map Numbers: Request: 28.00-1-7 Rezone R-1 to I-1 22.86 w ACTION # A-52395-2 ITEM NUMBER C AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 23, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Funding the Relocation of a Water Line during the Colonial Avenue Road Project COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: a~~ BACKGROUND: VDOT has supplied our office with plans showing improvements to Colonial Avenue from Brambleton Avenue to Penn Forest Boulevard. It is expected that construction will begin in early 1996. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: To allow for the improvements to Colonial Avenue, a portion of Roanoke County's 10-inch water line will need to be relocated. Because Colonial Avenue is considered a secondary road project, the cost of relocating this water line falls on Roanoke County. It is estimated that the engineering and construction costs for this project will be $36,000. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are available in the Utility Department Water Fund for this project. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board authorize and fund this project in the amount of $36,000. Funds would be allocated from the unappropriated balance of the water fund. `R. ti ~'~ SUBMITTED BY: Gary Rob tson, P.E. Utility irector Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) APPROVED: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION Motion by: Motion by H. Odell Minnix to approve funding of relolcation VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy x Johnson x Kohinke x Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance A-52395-3 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens No Yes Abs x x x x x ~r~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 23, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Request from Virginia Amateur Sports, Inc. for additional funding of $5,000 for FY 94/95 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: G~~ /l ~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Mr. Peter Lampman, President of Virginia Amateur Sports, Inc., has requested that Roanoke County provide an additional $5,000 for this year's Commonwealth Games. They are requesting this money based on matching funds that have been secured from new sponsorships. Mr. Lampman advises that last year the Commonwealth Games had 7,985 athletes competing in 39 sports, and this year, they are expecting 9,500 athletes to compete in 44 sports, which is a 20% increase in athlete participation. Although Roanoke County has already appropriated $30,000 in this year's budget for the games, this additional funding will assist with the additional costs for increased participation and bring economic rewards to the County. FISCAL IMPACT' If the Board wishes to increase its contribution to Virginia Amateur Sports, Inc., the $5,000 could be appropriated from the General Fund Unappropriated Balance. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board appropriate $5,000 to Virginia Amateur Sports, Inc. for FY 94/95 from the General Fund Unappropriated Balance. Elmer C. o ge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) cc: File_ Diane Brent ACTION VOTE Motion by: Motion by H. Odell Minnix to approve funding of $5.000 from Unappropriated Balance D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Robertson, Budget Manager ~ ~~----°°'~ .. C'am` ' /' 305 First Street, S.W., Suite 412 Roanoke, Virginia 24011 _ (703) 343-0987 VIRGINIA AMATEUR SPORTS, INC. FAX (703) 343-7407 PRESENTING SPONSORS ~ Mobil April 7, 1995 ~~~ ? C ~ ~`~ ' NationsBank * L(~~ /~/ ``"t PREMIER, lYir• EltIler I-lodge sPONSOas County Administrator wWD Radio County of Roanoke GOLD MEDAL P• O• BMX 29800 saoNSOas Roanoke, Va. 24018 Contel Cellular Domino's Pizza Dear Elrner, Holiday Inn, Tanglewood Kroger I am following up on the conversation we had in November Roanoke Times and on the letter that I wrote you on November 9 &WoddNews regarding additional financial support from Roanoke StoDlnFoodStores County for this year's Commonwealth Games. CITGO SIWERMEDAL 'L'he additional fiends were based on matching funds up to SPONSORS $5,000 that Virginia Amateur Spores had secured froul Cariiion new sponsorships. We are very close to confirming our Gentry, Locke, newest sponsors, so please let me know what I need to do Rakes, & Moore Maid Bess to secure the county's rilatC}ling funds. BRONZE MEDAL Last rear we had 7 985 at}~letes competir~ in 39 sorts. SPONSORS } ~ t' g p Appalachian Power 'I'bis year we are expecting 9,500 athletes to compete ir1 44 Blue Ridge Outdoors sports; a 20°~o increase in athlete participation. These figures do not include the families and friends that may Chas, Lunstord SOnS Si ASSOC. attend the Games during the weekend. This additional R""orVa.,ln°. participation will bring new dollars to the county as the LAMAROutdoorAdvertising athletes and their families go out to eat, spend the night, Roanoke Fruit & Produce Shop at the IIla11S, etC. Roanoke Electric Steel Please accept my thank you in advance for your support in providing us the opportunity to continued our "TRADITION of EXCELLENCE." SPONSOR OF ~~,-'~~ Sincerely, ~~ ~`y~~~~,~~/~/ Peler Lam rnan _ `~_!~ President O~ _ ~~` PROMOTING SPORTS IN THE OLYMPIC IDEAL ~~~ Sandaned by the United States Congress o1 State Games and recognized by the United States Olympic Committee V~ R G ~ ~~ Recycled Paper ~-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 23, 1995 RESOLUTION 52395-4 OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO REIMBURSE ITSELF FROM THE PROCEEDS OF A FINANCING FOR SEWER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS The Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County") has determined that it is necessary or desirable to advance money to pay the costs of acquiring, constructing, equipping and developing certain improvements or expansions related to the County's share of the joint sewage treatment plan facility and interceptors, as outlined in a contract signed November 9, 1994 between the County of Roanoke ("Project") and to reimburse such advances with proceeds of one or more financings. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA: 1. The Board of Supervisors adopts this declaration of official intent under Treasury Regulations Section 1.150-2. 2. The Board of Supervisors reasonably expects to reimburse advances not to exceed $500, 000 made or to be made by the County to pay the costs of acquiring, constructing, equipping and developing the Project from the proceeds of its debt or other financings. The maximum amount of debt or other financing expected to be issued for the Project is $13,100,000. 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: `~)2~C f,.~ . ~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Gary Robertson, Director, Utility ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 23, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Advance of Funds and Approval of Reimbursement Resolution for Expenses Related to Joint Sewage Treatment Plant Facility Project COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Recommend approval. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: On November 9, 1994 the County of Roanoke signed a joint contract with the City of Roanoke, the County of Botetourt, the City of Salem, and the Town of Vinton, related to the construction of a joint sewage treatment plant facility with a system of interceptors. The County's portion of the joint sewage treatment expansion project is estimated to be $13,100,000. Staff is pursuing financing through the State Water Control Revolving Loan Pool. The time table for receiving money from this loan program is as follows: June 1995 Submit application to the State Water Control Board September 1995 Receive notification from the State Water Control Board for approval January 1996 Funds should become available from the Water Control Board The County of Roanoke, the Town of Vinton, and the County of Botetourt all filed applications to the State Water Control Board last year for this project. Because the design phase of this project was in the initial stage, we were not approved for funding last year but were told we would be top priority to receive this year's pool funds. The City of Roanoke has begun work on the preliminary design and will be billing us monthly for architectural and design costs related to this project in accordance with the contract. In order to have funds available to pay these bills and to later include these costs in the financing of the project, it will be necessary to loan a maximum of $1,000,000 from the General Fund to the Sewer Fund and adopt m:\finance\common\board\5-23-956.wpd May 19, 1995 a ~ the attached resolution. These funds will be transferred only as needed to pay bills as they are incurred and will be reimbursed to the General Fund during the 1995-96 fiscal year when financing is complete. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, ~ .nm~ ~~ ~.ict 1Sl _ ~,~~ Diane D. Hyatt Elmer C. Hodge Director of Finance County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved () Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied () Eddy _ Received () Johnson _ _ Referred () Kohinke _ _ _ To () Minnix _ _ Nickens _ i• • m:\finance\common\board\5-23-95b.wpd May 19, 1995 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF / ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 23, 1995 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF TIIE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO REIMBURSE ITSELF FROM THE PROCEEDS OF A FINANCING FOR SEWER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS The Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County") has determined that it is necessary or desirable to advance money to pay the costs of acquiring, constructing, equipping and developing certain improvements or expansions related to the County's share of the joint sewage treatment plan facility and interceptors, as outlined in a contract signed November 9, 1994 between the County of Roanoke ("Project") and to reimburse such advances with proceeds of one or more financings. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA: 1. The Board of Supervisors adopts this declaration of official intent under Treasury Regulations Section 1.150-2. 2. The Board of Supervisors reasonably expects to reimburse advances not to exceed $1,000,000 made or to be made by the County to pay the costs of acquiring, constructing, equipping and developing the Project from the proceeds of its debt or other financings. The maximum amount of debt or other financing expected to be issued for the Project is $13,100,000. 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. • m:\finance\common\board\2-28-95.res ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 23, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Requests for Public Hearing and First Reading for Rezoning Ordinances Consent Agenda COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' The first reading on these ordinances is accomplished by adoption of these ordinances in the manner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions, rather approval satisfies the procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public hearing and second reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public hearing on these ordinances is scheduled for June 27, 1995. The titles of these ordinances are as follows: 1) An ordinance to rezone .84 acre from C-1 to C-2 to operate a karate and fitness studio, located at 5407 Peters Creek Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Susan Carol Rolfe & Mark Reinhardt. 2) An ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to operate a convenience store and gasoline outlet, located at the corner of Plantation and Hershberger roads, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Workman Oil Co. 3) An ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to operate a used car lot, located on the west side of Williamson Road 400 feet north of its intersection with Plymouth Drive, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Shelor Inc. J µl-y 4) An ordinance to amend the text of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance to allow manufactured homes in the County's agricultural zoning districts pursuant to Section 15.1-486.4, as amended in the 1995 Legislative Session, upon the petition of the Roanoke County Planning Commission. MAPS ARE ATTACHED; MORE DETAILED INFORMATION I3 AVAILABLE IN THE CLERR~B OFFICE. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: (1) That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of these rezoning ordinances for the purpose of scheduling the second reading and public hearing for June 27, 1995. (2) That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth as Items 1 through 4, inclusive, and that the Clerk is authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action. Respectfully submitted, ~. YV! Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Minnix Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens Vote No Yes Abs '-" COUNTY OF ROANOKE • L DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING Z 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 For staff use only ed: date ecei rece~ d Jay: ~ e2 -'-Y~- ap n C BZA d / ~ placa d issued: 805 date: L Case Number: ~ / ~ rJ }~-I Check type of application filed (check all that apply): REZONING ^ SPECIAL USE ^VARIANCE Applicant's name: S'u- s a.~, ~ a~ o / /Zv / f e,-~ N~ ~~ S, 2%2 Q~ ~~ phone: c~6 a - 4`~0°~ ~~ d cP /~~'~~ Aces ,P_oa-d ,v 41 cr'~3/ Pc.~t~s C/e~,C'~~/ . Address: yA a 90/ 9 Zip Code: ~ g a~ / .~ a ax.v,C'v ~ ,~ G a..~ o ,..¢. !~ Owner's name: /~7v~. ~2 ~~ _ ,Ga-f'~~s ~dn~ a~-y Phone:~'~¢' ~S'aa~ ~ X // 9 a 9 Zip Code: `3 `? D D Address: ~' d' 6 ¢ 'o ~ a, S ,~ ~~~6~ ~ Location of property: Tax Map Number: ~ , '' ~ . t ; d,., ~~ ~ ¢ a ~ ~ ~o Qua ~ Magisterial District: `~ ~ ~~/ ~i) / Community Planning Area: ~n ~Al ~ /'/,. ,~ ~ Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: C / . ~ ~ acres Existing Land Use: ~d / ~ P ~ ,l'i, ~ ~ 1' ~ ~' t~ ;' I ~,`~ ~3 d'3 sq.ft. Proposed Zoning: C cQ ~ ~ r For StaN Use Only ~ ~ ~ /~ es s s ~ x.- Proposed Land Use: ,t'a~a fe 4~ oC v Use Type: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES ~ NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. _ Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES _~~ NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v -~ ~ ws v ws v Consultation 8 1!2" x 11" concept plan Application fee Application ~<= CVtetes and bounds description `;:~> Proffers, if applicable Justification ``r~ Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners !hereby certify that / am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the know/edge and consent of the owner. Owner's Signature: ~u/ .2 ~ 'I ~A (•' ~, ~ / a' /._ _ ~~J~ `-~ ~-i SUSAN C ROLFE 507 Peters Creek Road old D l~T V Uuildina 7.nning Ordinance As with any form of exercise, we will encourage a healthier community. In addition to physical conditioning, students will learn valuable self-defense tecl~niclues. Karate develops not only the body, but the mind as well. Participants will develop self- discipline and self respect. They will develop coordination and learn the proper way to avoid confrontation and correct ways to fall. Developing comradery and working as a team are additional benefits. Furthermore, as with any physical activity, weight control and stress relief can more easily be achieved. Our business will promote health, safet}r, and general welfare to the surrounding community. This business will reduce congestion in the public streets. The previous occupant, D.M.V., reported nine hundred to one thousand and two hundred transactions a day. On an average, one thousand cars used the parking lot and adjoining streets daily. Often, cars were parked in the streets and the drive-thru line would extend into the street. Karate is an evening sport, so traffic will be minimal during business hours. Approximately, thirty cars per hour, averaging around one hundred cars nightly can be expected. 2. ~rZprehensive Plan The building with a C-2 status will coincide with other businesses in the area. Several businesses in that area are already C-2 status. Therefore, a strip pattern of development has already occurred. The property provides two driveways accessible from two different streets, allowing for easy access. m acl No impact to property. Traffic will be considerably less than previous usage. A karate studio will provide services, not currently offered. Since participants include families, adjoining businesses will benefit from added exposure. Negligible usage for water and sewer. Studio will have less traffic than previous owner. Studio will provide after-school instructional lessons. Buses may drop-off students. Retarding parks ailci recreation, studio will provide valuable skills to students. Regarding fire and rescue, ilo change. ~Pk, -2.0' 95 (THUS 16 ~ 33 P. 002 _' Montague-Betts Company i~RITER' 3 pIRSCT DX~-L NURSER (80~) 5~2-3157 April 20, 1995 County of Roanoke Zoning and Planning Attention: Mr. John Hartley To Whom !t May Concern: 1619 1f7th~ ~nad (14501) p, ~. Soz 1149 I,pnchburg, ~'~- Za506 7Calephoae: (80a) 52Z-3200 Pe-z NUaber: (804) 528-0303 Montague-9etts Company hereby agrees to the rezoning requested by Mark Steven • Reinhardt on the .84 acres of our property located at Peters Creek and Woodhaven Road, Roanoke, VA, from C-i (office} to C-2 (retail?• !f we can help in any way. please contact me directly at (804) 522-3257. Sincerely, MONTAGUE-BETTS COMPANY t;dward F. Richards, CPA Chief Accountant EFR/mms zo~zo • d Ls : zu EGG Z - Z c.-CIdH ~~ ~ ~b yo o ~~. 11 `~~ lJ ~ 3., Z ~ s`dY Qg. J •rb ~` t ti r r ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ o 8 m ~ ~ a ~ T W ~•+~ y f 4 °.. ' l 1''1 U ~ m Q:' ~ ` I ~ ©o~ .~ _ ~~ ~ ~ 4~'0 1 ~ . t ~ u; ~~ ~ ~, ,-,r~ , - ~ _ ~ ......... m ova ~ - ~I ~ x d'0 J O ~_ .. ![(. A IFr ° -. m ~ t ~ ..... ~.... ~ ~ ~ o ~ i ......_ _ , ~• • :~~ aim .t~'ct t1~tt ,xcL QcJ y yVi ~' ,-'c ~~-c %700 ]Ap1q ~o`. - .v'1t +~~..~.. ~r 6 /~ r ~ K .tLV9l ~ a~+ f _ --~~ A % 1/ s = I I }V d~ ~ ~ ~.. ~ ` I, ~ ~ 8 <i~ i 11 1 ~1 ! ~ li ~ I a 0 a 7 1 ui A i [ i i1 ! ..,~,.... ~ n ~~ ~ o ~ jb.. _0 { 1 - i I { R . F~ I'll F l J ~ ~ c'L gl3 '©°~ ¢ { ~ ~ 1 .. ~r ~ ~^ ~r j ,..,~i iii i j ~ i N(y i ~ ' a ., b g3 a J YLIYM .Ol ~ 1}q~NYJ ty~~ ~ n ~ t~Y'd ~LJ v _~ LYL~ W'OLfI 'i'Cl ~ ~ I ~ ~v~Yi~~'~ w-70-OL'iL J Jcvl ~?1N0 Y p A~iVt ~~ '0 MYf71Vd ~ arc. ~:5 ZO ~97d 3L~OOW 3I~~IW 690LS91E0L S0~0i S66T/0i/b0 For staff use only COUNTY OF ROANOKE da r cei~e received by: ,~ DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. S~V app ication fe ` ~c;az.:,,da•~ J P.O.'Box 29800 placard i e 305 dap~e`LL, Roanoke, VA 24018 ~ (~+ (703) 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 Case Number y ~ '~~ Check type of application filed (check alf that apply): ^ REZONING ®SPECIAL USE ^VARIANCE Applicant's name: Workman Oi 1 Co . , Inc . Phone: 7 0 3 - 5 8 6 - 8 3 Address: 82&..;~a~.or Sta , Bedford, VA Zip Code:24523 Owner's name: Workman Oil Co. , Inc. Phone:703-586-83 Address828 Macon St., Bedford, VA Zip Code:24523 Location of property: Tax Map Number: 3 8. 1 6 - O 1 - 0 2 corner of rjaa 2 lantation and Magisterial District: / Her hb " s erger Road. C ~ ommunity Planning Area: ~ Size of pa~cal~s): ~ Existing Zoning: C-2 • 826 . -acres Existing Land Use: Service Station sq.ft. • . • PfopOSed Zoning: .Fvr.Statf Use'.On/y.. . Proposed Land Use: Convenience Store and Gasoline Outlet Use Type: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES x N_0 IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO ~: . .............. ............................. ........................... . . .. . . .: . . .. . . . . . . . Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. rvs v ws v ws v x Consultation x 8 1 /2" x 1 1" concept plan Application fee x Application x :'x`: Metes and bounds descri tion ..~< p Proffers, if applicable Justification <~`: Water and sewer a lication Ad'oinin PP ~ g property owners l hereby certify that / am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner. Owner's Signature: 1 1 o~ The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. This location is now being operated as a 3-bay service station. We believe that our plans for a convenience store and retail gasoline marketing facility are consistent with the purpose of the zoning ordinance and the district classification in that this would expand the variety of commerical and service related activities in the area. In this C-2 area the quality products and services provided by the facility would add to the options afforded to motorists living within the district and to those who pass through. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. The existing location, corner of Plantation Road and Hersh- berger Road already conforms to the existing zoning ordinance. It has accessibility and is capable of handling high traffic volume. The facility will .provide an additional retail outlet to serve the growing suburban population of Roanoke County. The area north of this location seems to be expanding to a large degree in single-family homes. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. Due to the fact that this facility is an existing one, the impact will definitely be positive, this location has not been up-dated in many years. With a new look it will enhance the community a great deal, we futher intend to be a good responsible member of the community. Applicant Workman Oi 1 Co . • ROAH02CE COUNTY UTILITY DEPARTHSNT • ~-{ APPLICATION FOR WATER OR SEWER SERVICE 1, TO PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Date 4 - /~- 9VJ Name of Applicant__.~'cc S 2~ ,~a ~c1C~ Phone v~'~O ~ - ~ ~ ~ Address of Applicantvr'¢07 ~~~ni_S ('iee~ ~~. ~oa.~o~ ,//~~- ~-1 0/ Name of Developer_ Phone Address of Developer Name of Design Engineer Phone Address of -Design Engineer Name of Contact Person _~('~ s. a ,L ~,~ /~P Name of Proposed Development Type of Development and proposed number of units (Be specific) e c~~' ~P~ Location of proposed development (FL'PNISH COPY OF MAP AND PLP.~yI~+~"i?IC NUMBER): Size of proposed development in acres: ~ Acres Give minimum and maximum elevation (Use USGS Elevations) at which the individual water/sewer service connections would be located: Minimum feet MSL. Maximum feet MSL Is this application for a development that w'll be a part or section of a larger future development? ~ No Yes If yes, provide map of entire area if available. Signature off/ Ap`pricant (,; ~. ~ _ {x~AS' I ~ ~~` X26 i~ f~~ I \ rouo:,r /NN Q 3p 29 a~ ~ _ a ~ - v ~ -,~ AQ~, : ~ o f i *~ ~ ~ " - q, ~ s ~,. ~ -`..o.y 1~, \ ~ fir''>~"~' ~ ~'<,'9°0 ~. S ~~ ~0 9 .J~V^Q Q~ .L~YA.; vJ~ ~G ~~~2 ~~ 4 45/~ ~; LEA' ~~ ~'x'(I:T'+W~~'Sr.ST.~PaNC.^+URN ~ .~ ~~: `1 E;;E~=' V - r ~ ~ mss- ~ ,w: •,~ _ _ ~ ~: ~''Y = 1 C I N (T Y M A P ~ ~• ~~ ,,_'sC.v _ ~ c~ =_ _ ~<< ~ V ~~ R~~~°~` .~ 4 ~9 / ~ l~~r ~ t ~~.:. ,~ iy ,,, '~' 'J~~ •~tt sy~e e~'~ 9 ~ i3 4 i ~~3~ f^^`}I NORTH 2p ~~ ~ ~iir ~~ ~~ \~ ~fi~ / ,~~' :: n~' /g ,' / ~ '~ i~ o \ ~ `•, !8 ~~~ 'o / ' ~ /7 ~• `d'' •~~ b \ ~~ i ? ,. '' io ~ u ~ '/ a wool { ~~ ._ ,o.o s.l, ~ ~~~ s 3 A ~ ~ r- ~ n ~ i ~1 ;6zo y6~z k 3 .,Qna ~~ ~ p~.M ~ 1; V e Count o C~~yo e P<<< \ F~°nok RpOnck-C~~~t a ~ Gtih o~ ~t,~, l r~• e,~n+ Ro~~oKe C,TY ~~~ ~'* DEPARZi~NI' OF PLPNNIAG SUSAN ROLFE ~ MARK REINHARDT '= C-1 TO c-2 AND ZONING ~' ~ TAX n 26.20-5-7 tJ' Y a~ ADO 1 ~ ~, 1 ~" ~_ ., , COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.O. Box 29800 ' Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 For staff use on/y %v ~ date re a receive by: ` ~ application fee: ?C/BZ dat ~~ L~ /• placards issued: BOS d e: - ~J ~ 7/ Case Number: /,, r,~ ~ ' "" Check type of application filed check all that apply): ^ REZONING LySPECIAL USE ^ VARIANCE Applicant's name: S~lELc~ Ttl~-, ~.~ %~. 1--~ ~`~~``' =''' ~ , Phone: .~~2-?7 Y Address: G7/ S W~~t~r 11~~.' ;2~ . QaQ~lo/L~ V,4 Zip Code: ?)Ta~9 Owner's name: B£7T?l Fu~!E.~ Phone: ?~:=~- ~' i9 Address: ~22~ w~t.:_T.^ ^ r"' ~ ,z~. ~,;~,.~. Zip Code: ?~;~ of "' ratio of p ope ,, /f /~ ax Map Number: ~ ~ ~~ _ _ N,~~~r,.~~ o,,,~ ` ~ ~-~J Magisterial District: ~/v,/~~rS ~oA-Na~F /~ ~ ~°I? Community Planning Area: r. Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: ~-~ . 33~ acres Existing Land Use: sq.ft. Proposed Zoning: s'pf_sll~ u; Foi Staff Use On/y Proposed Land Use: usED ~v,2 DoT Use Type: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES ~ NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO :::::::::::::::::::::: Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INC MPLETE. ws ~t ws '~ Consultation 8 1 /2" x 1 1" concept plan Application ='::'' Metes and bounds description Justification ' 'a Water and sewer application rtes ~' Application fee Proffers, if applicable Adjoining property owners l hereby certify that l am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and c~sent of the owner. ~-3 Owner's Signature: For Slaff Use Only: Case Number Applicant S~{_<Lo~Z SNP ff•3 The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. (Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. ~~~ ~ T 'TiS~E Loo1G~ ~o~ ~{ fFEI ~ F ~£ Af~F~i , T/~f L dT ~7 W.~~'LL ~>~ d VC W`lLL ,~_ !.~~ t ~ / , I Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. ~F L1lT wTLL ~o~rr~GrE To WD~ QEI~G;= ~C~/ QcgNo~CE caN~`~'lYS 0~,~, ~F of wT~ c~o rrR~2Er•'~ N r /t Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. Tyt ~Q~~Fi~TI w~LL /-l~v~ ~'~ s1D/~S~ .~i~`,~~cJ~ a N Tisr~ ~i~~ a a ~I.~xrll, ,/J>2: )fit'?-yf ~, =r7- W.zGL ~ .~ !:~ _~ - L Tj,7r;.9%}- 1 ti's ii~{;~.:'•'.~C.! ! n T~G /~i~ f~ SDI ~ •r-/. // ~O/E%'f~ /~ ~ r ~ T/~E 5,~~'A~uNf:-tr/, ~fA, Tlf~ ~Roic~'~ I~~GL ,.!~~ ~.,'~vF . ., ROABO~CE COUNTY UTILITY DEP?~RT:~NT ~3 APPLICATION FOR i~,'ATER OR SE'w~,R SERVICE - TO PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Date ~ Name of Applicant Phone_ Address of Applicant Name of Developer Address of Developer Name of Design Engineer Address of Design Engineer Nave of Contact Person Name of Proposed Development Phone Phone Type of Development and proposed number of units (Be .specific) Location of proposed development (FURVISH COPY Or MA.P PyD PL~~I`~~''~IC NLi~SER) Size of proposed development in acres: ~ Acres Give minimum and maximum elevation (Use USGS Elevations) at which the individual water/sewer service connections would be located: Minimum feet MSL. Maximum feet MSL Is this application for a development that will be a part or section of a larger future development? No Yes if yes, provide map of entire area if available. (OYEZ) Signature of Applican t ~~ ~ '~~ ~ 3 r--- AMISS ~ ,, 1 w ~ ~ .. \ " \ G~' 1. PAVEMENT PER OFF STREET PARKING REWIREI IENT'S ~ ~ ~ ~ rs ~`? q,, `fli ~ ~ . 2 PLANT N T y ~ ~ a y,~ . I G S RIP SHALL INCLUDE ~ 3 o_ ` ' ONE SMALL DECIDUOUS TREE OR ONE LARGE DECIDUOUS OR N $ o ,, ~ ~1 EVERGREEN TREE FOR E`+ERY ~ ~ ,` ' ~ 30' UNEAR F00T EiOROERINC RIGHT OF WAY. ~ Y ~ ,. 11 ;, p `, ;; 11 N 1, TOE AT CREEk v ~ p " ~~ EXIST. TRIPLE °; j30' CMP ... _ '~ ot- FLOW :- : ~ _ ; ~ ,\ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ I+~ w ~ ~ ~ Y ~. , ' ~ ~ , ~ ousx To oAwN ~~ (~> ~ ~. ~ o ~ v~~ ,, a \ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ 2' ,~ =` a~ ~ u11 ` ~~ i I i `` 1 Y X ~ 1 ', ~ J r :PAVED : VEHICLE: ° . DISP LAY. AREA ~ I ~~~ ~ FENCE SHALL BE P,EMOVEU ~ I ' ~ AS NECESSAR'r FOR ACCESS- ', 1 I EXISTING PROPERT'r ~ ~ ' r OF SHELOR INC. , I --~ ~ ~ ~ i PROPOSED I 5.1~ INATED ~ . ' , 0, ~ptl!!G STRIP ~ ~.~ l 1 ~ 1 5 ~' t ~ _ _ 1 ~ ~~ I r ~ - f ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~- ~ ~ '" SCALE 1"~3fl' E N G I N E E R 3, P. C. J2S YaanWn Avow. Roueln, tirpti~ 2401. 7m-3fe-8020. TlX 70S-S{6-EC~J Member o/ the American Consulting Engineers Council CONCEPT PLAN TAX PARCEt_ 27.18-1-5.2 OWNER: BETTY FULLER TENANT: SHELOR, INC. DESIDNED DRAwn CyECKED DATE PRCUECT GS RNP APRIL 26, 1995 95043 r 9 HILLS ~ ~ ~' ~ ' ~"Ye ~~ i 117 eP V . ~ ~ .so+. NoRTx ~ s ~ 115 p~h ~S,rOMC/ F 0~ •E1~~'~ u / ~ Carv~r-< ~ ~, s? ~ 1 ~ \\EY, ~ I . NCR -~ I 4' 99F 4H I ~~ ~ '....t~v0~ i St• tti °do EVIE r" 6 ^r ~v 0 u 4~FT5. I W e~ < ~ MEDG ¢9 ~ K,~ ~ ~~ CE4'TR.~L -~t Q~~pJ ~ &7G`C`KSJO V 1 C i N I T Y MAP ~`,~,-,;~~~, !~ ,~ ~ ~ Goo ~i4 ` ---- / 1 L__I ~ i,:~r ~Y ~~i , ~' a I' I _ ? ,. ~ 6 a rt ut It • rur S 4 Q ~ ~ .r ^., 9 arJ ' .,., ' ! \ _ e ! f - ~ n r ~ ra.f 1 ' rarJ rat, ° 3 t u $ ~ r • ' 17 r~ . ~ ' R : ~ 1 2 • _ b II nor rasa J` g rf/J .M 1... - ,.. _ ~: I „.u r< O ~ ... ,622 ~ I6 s .rwa ~ • ,r ur f ~ ,. \ rrn sin 33 \ ~ ~ ~„ , : r ~ S' ~ •S srJe ° ~ <r .a,J 33 •' • az t< 1 i ' ~ 7 rrta . I a ri°O rul 32 3 - ~ r. 10 9 • ~uo. ,.. ;: 1 . rr.tO a I~ .,,, '31 ~ ,•a 1 ... ,623 ~' a Rt. Nu 2 2 1 ~ ue ' / r ooa< 3 rrot S,, I .. ~ 6 r' `<• .° .> i a • ftwo'~ N 1 ,.J I q.f _ ~ ( 3 '3 - I S.I r'=• ' ,.. 3 . 8 tr r» s 6 g - - - - ~ yar.wv Bfa~• rrar 4 4 '• , 41 , ' ~ ...29 Y.w.w.r Irvc ,.f " o 2 pJ, 'y28 t . " (~/ ~aS J 16 ~ ,.r ' O •`' Qn .r I3 r% ~ Ua ry 3 8~ b Z 23 a y '6~ r•J ^t 4 II a rro II • Y • 3 I ~'- s i y' i 24 1 p Oa' J r , oO - - - - '• / 7 to a.•a•/aaf ~ C a •, ~ AL.. , a,ae I~ i E l.~ • 2y "• Jr, o a M ~ __ 4' = DEPARTMENT OF PLA.IviVI\G SHELOR I NC . _ = ~ SPECIAL USE PERMIT AND ZONING TAX MAP # 27.18-1-5a2 .~ ,,, ,--Y PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE ROANOKE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE FOR MANUFACTURED HOMES ARTICLE I GENERAL PROVISIONS Sec. 30-23-2 Nonconforming Uses of Buildings, Structures or Land (H) Notwithstanding (A) through (G) above, a nonconforming ~''~^^ Q ~~ '''^^^ '' manufactured home existing on an individual lot of record that has served as an active dwelling for at least six months may be replaced with a~~T ~~manufactured home provided: 1. The replacement home is installed on the lot within four months of the removal of the home to be replaced, and; 2. The replacement home is installed in approximately the same location on the lot, and is installed to comply with the setback regulations for principal structures, and; 3. The installation of the replacement home complies with the Use and Design standards for manufactured homes contained in Section 3U-82- ~~ ~ " , .,.,a ~.~;;~. (Amend. Ord. 82394-10) ARTICLE II DEFINITIONS AND USE TYPES SEC. 30-28 DEFINITIONS MANUFACTURED HOME - A structure, transportable in one or more sections, which in the traveling mode is 8 body feet or more in width or 40 body feet or more in length, or, when erected on site, is 320 or more square feet, and which is built on a permanent chassis and designed to be used as a dwelling with or without a permanent foundation.. A manufactured home shall contain one dwelling unit. Some manufactured homes are also referred to as mobile homes. SEC. 30-29 USE TYPES; GENERALLY Sec. 30-29-2 Residential Use Types 1 May 18, 1995 N~ MANUFACTURED HOME, ACCESSORY - A~~-manufactured home that is subordinate to a single family dwelling. on a single lot and meets the additional criteria contained in Section 30-82-§. AAA1-111 A/'~TI I~C11 11A11AC /~ ~b' C A A I+' ..+: .,I m.~r.af..i.+. ..rl h.. - r`~ , ri~nyr[ ~r r- i i i ' ' h ! m~~a~}~ ~,.~~.1 L. e ~ + ~~~~i+.~ L . L GT[:7T CTTT I '1 0 1 L: +h i , ~ n + ~+ m~+~++e. ~ r wi. ~+r ~ `7 ~ ~ ~" MANUFACTURED HOME, EMERGENCY - A Mass-manufactured home used temporarily for the period of reconstruction or replacement of an uninhabitable dwelling lost or destroyed by fire, flood, or other act of nature, or used temporarily as housing relief to victims of a federally declared disaster in accordance with Section 30-82-8. MANUFACTURED HOME SUBDIVISION - A five acre or larger community of manufactured home dwellings with lots that are subdivided for individual ownership. MANUFACTURED HOME PARK - A five acre or larger tract of land intended to accommodate a manufactured home community of multiple spaces for lease or condominium ownership. A manufactured home park is also referred to as a mobile home park. ARTICLE III -DISTRICT REGULATIONS SEC. 30-32 AG-3 AGRICULTURAL/RURAL PRESERVE DISTRICT Sec. 30-32-2 Permitted Uses (A) 2. Residential Uses Accessory Apartment 2 May 18, 1995 }{-4 Home Occupation, Type I and Type II * Kennel, Private * ~!I ~i i~ i;~~~tia i"e lii e< Manufactured Home, Accessory .,,,,, ~ * Manufactured Home, Emergency Residential Human Care Facility Single Family Dwelling, Detached SEC. 30-33 AG-1 AGRICULTURAL/RURAL LOW DENSITY DISTRICT Sec. 30-33-2 Permitted Uses (A) 2. Residential Uses Accessory Apartment Home Occupation, Type I and Type II * Kennel, Private * Manufactured~Home, Accessory * Manufactured Home, Emergency Residential Human Care Facility Single Family Dwelling, Detached SEC. 30-34 AR AGRICULTURAL/RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Sec. 30-34-2 Permitted Uses (A) 1. Agricultural and Forestry Uses Agriculture * Forestry Operations * Stable, Private * Stable, Commercial Wayside Stand * 2. Residential Uses Accessory Apartment Home Occupation, Type I Kennel, Private ~IC~iC11#2€u eta ±''i~_ 3 May 18, 1995 }}-`~ Manufactured Home, Emergency Residential Human Care Facility Single Family Dwelling, Detached SEC. 30-36 AV VILLAGE CENTER DISTRICT Sec. 30-36-2 Permitted Uses IA1 2. Residential Uses Accessory Apartment Home Beauty/Barber Salon Home Occupation, Type I Kennels, Private * Manufactured Home, Emergency * Residential Human Care Facility Single Family Dwelling, Attached * Single Family Dwelling, Detached Two Family Dwelling * SEC. 30-41 R-1 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Sec. 30-41-2 Permitted Uses (A) 1. Residential Uses Home Occupation, Type I * Manufactured Home,,Z~-A * Manufactured Home, Emergency * Residential Human Care Facility Single Family Dwelling, Detached (For Zero Lot Line Option - *) Single Family Dwelling, Attached SEC. 30-42 R-2 MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Sec. 30-42-2 Permitted Uses IAI 1. Residential Uses Accessory Apartment Home Occupation, Type I Kennel, Private * 4 May 18, 1995 ~-ti' Manufactured Home,,- A Manufactured Home, Emergency Residential Human Care Facility Single Family Dwelling, Attached Single Family Dwelling, Detached (For Zero Lot Line Option - *) Two Family Dwelling * SEC. 30-45 R-3 MEDIUM DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Sec. 30-45-2 Permitted Uses (A) 1. Residential Uses Accessory Apartment Home Occupation, Type I Manufactured Home, ~-~lae~ Manufactured Home, Emergency Multi-family Dwelling * Residential Human Care Facility Single Family Dwelling, Attached Single Family Dwelling, Detached (For Zero Lot Line Option - *) Townhouse * Two Family Dwelling SEC. 30-46 R-4 HIGH DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Sec. 30-46-2 Permitted Uses (A) 1. Residential Uses Accessory Apartment Home Occupation, Type I * Manufactured Home, '~~ * Manufactured Home, Emergency * Multi-family Dwelling * Residential Human Care Facility Single Family Dwelling, Attached * Single Family Dwelling, Detached (For Zero Lot Line Option - *) Townhouse Two Family Dwelling * 5 May 18, 1995 w-r ARTICLE IV USE AND DESIGN STANDARDS SEC. 30-81 AGRICULTURAL AND FORESTRY USES Sec. 30-81-3 Farm Employee Housing (AI General standards: ~. ;.:,;:.::: ~: :l ill: c'7 ~.~. ;~ >»><...:...:....,~ .....~ > `~ ~r ~.~ ~...~.......d.u~~... Qt~..~~€ts..d.e ... a....~.. ~Ctu..~........!~r~~......r... <:rn n: f i :>` ~ ~.:::.~:::::::::::~~~.::: ~t~::: ~a.::~~ .:::.::::::.....................................:.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:::::::::::::.:::::::::::::::::::..:::.::::::.p::::.::::::::. 6 May 18, 1995 ~~ >::: ~s~~~ntla~<>~~~tr~~t~t~~...irt. .. :::::~ .:::::::::::::::::::::.:::::::::::::: x.:::::::::::.•..::::::::::::.:.::::::::::::.::::::.::.::.::.::.::.::.::.::.;:.::.;:.::.::.;::.::::::.;::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ....................................................................................... . '>: ~~' .'~).~::::'3i:3i:F:~~:1~:::::1~:1~:1~:it:t:R:1S:i~~:t;S:{:~SI.~:::::~:~1.W.:): ).lii. 7A Q7 C 11Ar.r...~....•.......d L.L.r.~... /'~Ir...n A s~, ~Tarrar~r~rr~a-rrv-rrr~v~rc 1 Th., Inn.,+:`.r. ~,f .+ r`I.,nn A m.+r~~ ~f.,~.t~ ~r.,~J h~m~ it ~ r~l.~r~r~~rl_. r~c~irli+r~+i.+l T. -TT May 18, 1995 N9 "~ h., .,-.n ..h..ll h.,..., ~~T ' ., 7 G~~.:.z ..'l ~!~__n ,:r.:.,-,. u~rL.~:+nh-ron~ r TIIC'CL7 11 h., ~ # ~ +:. ..+ #IeE - - ~ a ., r:. t ,ln + rn+ ~ e-~ee - ~~ee~ef ~, .~ e , ~Q ~~ Sec. 30-82-§ Manufactured Homes, Accessory (A) Intent -These regulations are adopted in recognition that certain families would benefit from living arrangements that allowed family members to reside in close proximity to each other but in separate dwelling units on the same lot. Also recognized in these provisions is the need for affordable housing alternatives for farm employees on bona-fide farm operations. (B) General standards: 1. The accessory manufactured home shall be located on the same lot as a principal dwelling. This principal dwelling must be a single family dwelling ~ The accessory manufactured home shall only be occupied by: a. A person or persons immediately related to the person or family in the principal dwelling. For the purposes of this Section, immediately related shall be any person or persons who are natural or legally defined offspring, parent, or grandparent of the owner of the principal dwelling; OR, b. A farm employee and his/her family in accordance with the provisions for farm employee housing contained elsewhere in this Article. 3 No accessory manufactured home shall be allowed within any Planned $ May 18, 1995 ff~ Residential Subdivision, as defined in Article II of this Ordinance. 4 The accessory manufactured home and the principal dwelling shall be located on the same lot of record. The lot of record must e' .......................... ........................... .......................... ........................................................................................................................................................... m:rn:i:rn:::m::::i ; : ~z.::::fio:r::::: he::::ct~str':pct<::~:n:::wl~~o~::<it:<:~:I:~ca: e~J:: ..................~.........Q~. ~.....~............~................................................................ ~..............~......... ........................................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................... Te~as~-ae~e: ~ The accessory manufactured home must be located behind the building line of the principal dwelling and shall meet the minimum side and rear yard setback requirements for principal structures in the district in which it is located. ~ The accessory manufactured home shall be anchored~a~ stabilized~'rc ;art in accordance with the provisions of the Virginia Uniform ~State~wide Building Code. , ' (CI Special Application Procedures: 1. Persons interested in obtaining a permit to install an accessory manufactured home shall make application to the Administrator, who shall have the authority to review and decide upon all applications. 2. In considering any application for an accessory manufactured home the Administrator shall visit the proposed site to view the proposed location and the character of the surrounding area. In making a determination to issue or deny any application the Administrator shall consider all of the following factors: a. The purposes of the zoning ordinance outlined in Section 30-3. b. The effect of the proposed accessory manufactured home on the conservation of surrounding properties and their values, and its effect on the existing use and character of the property. c. The general land use compatibility of the accessory manufactured home in relation to surrounding properties. 3. If the Administrator determines that the proposal does not conform to any of the location, use or design standards contained in the above, the Administrator shall deny the application and notify the applicant in writing. Any such denial may be appealed to the Board of Zoning Appeals. 9 May 18, 1995 Hy 4. If the Administrator determines that the proposal conforms to the provisions of this Section, the Administrator shall mail a first class letter to all adjacent property owners notifying each owner of the County's intent to issue a permit for the accessory manufactured home. All parties shall be given 15 days from the date of the notice to formally object in writing to the issuance of the permit. If an objection is filed, it shall be considered an appeal of the decision of the Administrator, and shall be considered by the Board of Zoning Appeals. The person filing the appeal shall be responsible for all required application and legal ad costs. 5. If no interested party objects within fifteen days of the date of the notice to the adjacent property owners, the administrator may approve the accessory manufactured home permit. 7 '^ ,~ r`1.,~... r` ~.f.,..+... .~1 4,~,.,.,.,.. ..h.,II h ...d +.,II.,.d ~~T~QS ~„-e IITT-17'P.'-e're~.1:G~1'TJTl7TTGCf ~ L. V.UJJ VAT ~ ~ Sec. 30-82-8 Manufactured Home, Emergency (B) General standards: 3 The emergency manufactured home shall meet all setback and yard 10 May 18, 1995 N-r requirements for the district in which it is located. It shall be anchored and stabilized in accordance with the provisions of the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code. 4 The emergency manufactured home must be removed as soon as reconstruction or replacement of the uninhabitable dwelling is complete, or within a 12 month period of its placement on the site, whichever is sooner. A one time extension of up to 6 additional months may be granted by the Administrator if substantial reconstruction of the destroyed dwelling has occurred, and work has, and is continuing to progress. A final certificate of zoning compliance for the reconstructed dwelling shall not be issued until the emergency manufactured home is removed from the site. Sec. 30-82-9 Manufactured Home Park (A) General standards: 4. In a Manufactured Home Park the (L) In Manufactured home parks established prior to June 1, 1986, existing manufactured homes may be replaced with ^ ~~zl~-II Manufactured Home consistent with Section 30-82-~~"~ provided all of the following standards are met: ~ ~~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~~ a. The manufactured home meets the side and rear yard setback for accessory structures, as specified in the underlying zoning district, from the property line of the park; b. The manufactured home is anchored in accordance with the provisions of the Virginia Statewide Uniform Building Code; and, c. The manufactured home is skirted with a durable material prior to occupancy. (Amended Ord. 42694-121 Sec. 30-82-10 Manufactured Housing Subdivision (A) General standards: 2. Use limitations: Areas designated on the approved preliminary plan as a 11 May 18, 1995 µ-4 manufactured housing subdivision shall be limited to °~,-;~-~f--B~ manufactured homes ~wel+i~ and single family dwellings. Where a combination of manufactured homes and single family dwellings are proposed, at least sixty percent (60%) of the lots shall be reserved exclusively for ~'~~~ ~~ ° manufactured homes. 4. Plat designation: Plats recorded for a manufactured housing subdivision shall contain the following statement, "This is a manufactured housing subdivision" and shall indicate which lots are reserved exclusively for ~'~~~ ~~ ° manufactured homes. SEC. 30-83 CIVIC USES Sec. 30-83-0.5 Camps (B) In the AG-3 and AG-1 Districts: 4. One year-round residence, including a £-Fates-y4 Manufactured Home, may be constructed as a caretakers home in addition to other facilities on the property. (Amended Ord. 42694-12) Sec. 30-85-9 Campground (A) General standards: 6. One ~''~~~ ^ ~~ ~'~~~ ° manufactured home, established pursuant to this ordinance, may be located in a campground as a caretaker's residence. A// Sections of the Zoning Ordinance not specifics//y identified above sha// remain unchanged by these proposed amendments. 12 May 18, 1995 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~° AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 23, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 17-14 "MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS" OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO PROVIDE FOR CERTAIN RESTRICTIONS ON CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ,yM O EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This ordinance revises the County Code for modification of contracts to bring it within the state enabling legislation. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Section 17-14 of the Roanoke County Code (Procurement Code) authorizes the modification of a contract during performance, but no fixed-price contract may be increased by more than twenty-five (25~) percent of the amount of the contract or ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) whichever is smaller, without the advanced written approval of the Board of Supervisors Section 11-55 of the State Code is the enabling legislation for this provision in the County Code; however, this section provides that no fixed-price contract may be increased by more than 25~ of the amount of the contract or $10,000.00 whichever is greater without the advance written approval of the governing body. In addition, the State Code provides that in no event may the amount of a contract be increased in order to relieve a bidder from the consequences of an error in its bid or offer. This proposed amendment brings the County Code into conformity with State Law. FISCAL IMPACTS• None 1 SI STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The County Attorney and the Purchasing Agent recommend that the Board favorably consider the adoption of the attached ordinance. First reading is scheduled for May 23, 1995 and second reading is scheduled for June 13, 1995. Respectfully submitted, „1 Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to contrac[.rpt Motion by Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens Minnix Vote No Yes Abs 2 Z=1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 23, 1995 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 17-14 "MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS" OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO PROVIDE FOR CERTAIN RESTRICTIONS ON CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia as follows: 1. That Section 17-14. Modification of Contracts, of the Roanoke County Code is hereby amended as follows: A public contract may include provisions for modification of the contract during performance, but no fixed-price contract may be increased by more than twenty-five (25~) percent of the amount of the contract or ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00), which ever is ~~~~_~ greater without the advanced written approval of the Board of Supervisors. In no event may the amount of any contract, without adequate consideration, be increased for any purpose, including, but not limited to. relief of an offeror from the consequences of an error in its bid or offer. 2. The provisions of this ordinance shall take effect on and from the date of its adoption. CONTRACT.ORD 1 S , ~ ~} AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 23, 1995 ORDINANCE 52395-5 AUTHORIZING THE EXCHANGE OF CERTAIN REAL ESTATE WITH FRANK D. PORTER III AND BEVERLY V. PORTER, HIS WIFE, IN CONNECTION WITH THE "LONGRIDGE" SUBDIVISION, AND THE SOUTH LOOP WATER TRANSMISSION LINE WHEREAS, Frank D. Porter, III and Beverly V. Porter, his wife, (hereinafter referred to as "Porter") desire to develop approximately 34.962 acres of real estate for the purpose of a residential subdivision known as "Longridge;" and WHEREAS, in order to successfully develop this property Porter requires from the County the conveyance of certain interests in real estate; and WHEREAS, the County requires Porter to convey to it easements for the purpose of the installation of the South Loop Main Water Transmission Line; and WHEREAS, Porter petitions the County to adopt this ordinance pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 and Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter in order to achieve their respective and mutual goals; and that the real estate in question does not conflict with other public uses and will ultimately serve a public purpose, and are hereby declared to be surplus; and, WHEREAS, the County's acquisition of utility easements and other real estate interests constitutes a fair consideration for the conveyance of other County real estate interests to Porter; and, 1 I ~ 1 1 WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on May 9, 1995, and the second reading and public hearing was held on May 23, 1995. BE IT ORDAINED By the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia: 1. That Porter shall convey to the County an easement for the installation of water and sewer utility lines by the recordation of a subdivision plat for the development of the Longridge Subdivision. The recordation of the final subdivision plat and the conveyance of these utility easements to the County shall occur no later than June 30, 1995. 2. That Porter shall complete the rough grading for the road network in the Longridge Subdivision by July 28, 1995. The completion of the rough grading of this site is a prerequisite for the County's installation of the water transmission line. Time is of the essence with respect to this provision of the ordinance. 3. That the Board hereby authorizes the acceptance of the conveyance from Porter of Parcel "E" as shown on a preliminary plat dated 22 February 1995 prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C. 4. That the Board hereby authorizes the acceptance of the conveyance and release of a private access easement across Parcel "A" as shown on a preliminary subdivision plat dated 22 February 1995 prepared by Lumsden and Associates, P.C. 5. That in consideration for these conveyances and site preparation the Board hereby authorizes the conveyance to Porter of the following parcels of real estate identified as "D," "F," and 2 i~ "G" as shown on a preliminary plat dated 22 February 1995 prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C. 6. That the Board by separate ordinance shall vacate a portion of Carolyn Circle approximately 600 feet in length and shall vacate all of Copeland Drive, approximately 220 feet in length. 7. That the County Administrator, or his designee, is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as may be necessary to accomplish the exchanges, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: „~c~, Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Gary L. Robertson, Utility Director Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Insepctions Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment 3 i ~ CT F ~ P.B. 9. PG. 211 ~ ~ ,,50 4 QQ •,~QQ ~ D.©. 1057. PG. 5A7 ~ ~ ~ t - - - ~ OWNED \ "-- ~` 5 3 ~ ~ RBCYS.s ~ ~~ ~~•. ~ •~ .~ ~ '~f ~ 'p~ ;»~ .i~,• ~ TO BE DEDICATED -'~~/ ,vE i~' (50~ R /j`* q q~T D , ~ 8Y RKE COUNTY R ,' i ' FRG:~cs_p a~~AD~ C'~ i ~ /_ 0 ~ '' • ~ ~(j JJ NORTH 1aX fI6.OF-1-ii ~i•11. ~ . ,`ro•~1 TR ~ P.3. J. rG. 21t ~\ yes 1'~ '. ,~ ~~ A ;. . F cS " , ' •~ ~ ' ~ ~~^- ~^ Q~ i . ~` / ~~ i ~~ ~ , \ 23 ? ~ 3LCCh T ~ SEE NOTE {~. O ~ Sr.EET t of 3 -~ _ - ~ ~ ~ • .~ ~ \` '' ~.; vacar~E• s. TAX ~I6.Ot-t-t2 r EXV"T. v ' P :) ~~ NOTFO,y;. cH ET 3 TRACT 9 i i0 BE REl1GVED ' yf,:~ - - 0.~. 1104. PC. 415 ~ 0 ~ ~ ' TAX ! N ~ ~ ~. .- - ~ ~ 76.01-I-1.'. 1 i ~. i~ i ~ ~ ~~ " i TRACT r - T - ~ P.B. SI, / 4 ~ PC. 211 ,~~ BLOCK 3 3 ~..~.. ao~Nao: CouNTY eo~NO aF suPQtwsaRs t.~,,,,~ "PROPERTY BEING CONVEYED TO , S:E NOTE /6 ., • fRMOC D. PORTER, ~ k BEVERLY V. PORTER . ,~ SHEET ~ 1 Of 3 -~~ FRANK 0. POR1fR, m k BEVERLY V. POICTER ~ ~ . PROPERTY EtE1N0 CONVEYED TO ROANOIO: COUNTY 80ARp OF SIJPERVLSORS it T-. ~.-.- .~ -. ~ ... ~. ~. r~~- .~~.~ .. ~. ._~... . ~.. i.. . .• .. ..~ .~ . .~ . ~ .. .... ~. .. .~ • .r 1. .~_~.[ ROANOKE COUNTY Lpg~GE SIIB~DIVISION ENGINEERING & FBAI~ D. PORTER, III_ •and BEVERLY V. POBTES INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT ACTION NO. ITEM NO. "~ '' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 23, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE EXCHANGE OF CERTAIN REAL ESTATE WITH FRANK D. PORTER III AND BEVERLY V. PORTER, HIS WIFE, IN CONNECTION WITH THE "LONGRIDGE" SUBDIVISION, AND THE SOUTH LOOP WATER TRANSMISSION LINE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: L`'~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY' This ordinance authorizes the conveyance of certain real estate to Frank D. Porter III and Beverly V. Porter, his wife, ("Porter") in order to assist Porter with the development of a proposed subdivision known as "Longridge." In exchange for this conveyance the ordinance authorizes the acceptance by the County of other real estate from Porter, including easements for the South Loop Water Transmission line. FISCAL IMPACTS' The assessed value of the real estate conveyed by the County to Porter is $495. The assessed value of the real estate conveyed by Porter to the County is $830, which includes approximately 1,260 feet of water line easement. Apart from minor transaction costs (preparation and recordation of deeds) incurred by the County, this transaction will benefit the County through the acquisition of the necessary easements for the South Loop Water Transmission line and through rough grading of the site which is critical for the installation of the water line. ALTERNATIVES' 1) The Board could adopt the ordinance as presented, authorizing and accepting the proposed real estate conveyances. 2 ) The Board could refuse to adopt this ordinance and direct staff to acquire the necessary South Loop Water transmission lines through payment of fair market value consideration, or failing that, condemnation. 1 J- I STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board adoption of the attached ordinance. Respectfully submitted, Gary L. Robertson, P.E. Utility Director favorably consider the Approved, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens Minnix Vote No Yes Abs 2 ' ~ Hlu ~°`< , omm[ a >: r ~ a ~ - •-«....,,...G , -- • :a°~n.~, ~µ HIDOEN ~ r•u~P 7 wll~ , ~ '^ Eowr^~w^o .3 1'.•~. ru ~B ry~~ •.~tc ,... ra,x, P~~y~1ll Y ~"'r, DIl1/, 1~~~\J~>\W TY r~i~r.1.1+~M4 :.•c~~'°"+^~/`,aC .r,. s '~rNOM`~ ~lX'.Aff~`17A6~57. Y;~ ,d P"` Y, rl. j~ oN ._ _:~~.. I/ -:r;rai.;nr \I t ~ rr ter, ': .CIJ[S>~~LL~i w ;y _ 798 HiGI1hN. •~. rena~ ~'~F eeL~?~v ~ ~ ° ,1., °-"~~ •~~ /\.r A-,q ~ '~CRESM1-Illl' !. •, ., 69j F •, ~ luh n'! ~~w~RA~iAF' y~\~ ~'4}~ ( •. v'r- /cT i~ ~ ~ t'' F ~~oii ~.~~/J/' 419 ~l ~t ~7 •'~~~v /i:~ . r. n \ I ~t VICINITY MAP = '=a° °"`~` S~ NORTH ' T~•x X76.01-I-2i TRACT F P.6. 9. PG. Lit e5~ ~ 0.©. 1057. PG. 597 G~' ~ \ ---- 5 OWNED ~ `. 6Y •~ .. R C. B.S ~~ ~ .•. . • ~ ' 'u~,l ~ ' p• '„~ ie , • `~ TO BE DEDICATED ~ `~C~?, D •', ~ BY RKE COUNTY 'PRC:°GScp R~at,p~( Can i „ » F- ., ' 3j ` . r f-i . r ,. /~~ C T r r EY3b'T. ' Tl~X ]76.07-t-ty r S7RUCTElRr" TRACT B , TO BE REl/GV[0 0.°. 1104, PC. 435 ~ r iAX ~ r 76.01-1-13 TRacT A r P.B. fl, r PC. 21t _ _ ROANOKE COUNTY 80ARD OF SUPFRVISORg ~• ~ . -.PROPERTY BEINC CONVEYED TO `~1'':r: ~~ fR/U•CC 0. PORTER, 1h to BEVERLY V, PORTER FRANK 0. PORTER, N i< BEVERLY V. PORTIIt ~ PROPERTY BEING CONVEYED TO ROANOICE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERMSORS T .. ~_. , • 4 Q Q ,~Q Qom. i ~_ '~~. ~, -~ RSV E ,-" (5 0' R;'j~'~ O ~ y ~~ ' / / ~o .. .•~ / ' ~ \ zs O~ r 3LOCK i / rr SEE N01E ~. , i SHEE7 10:3 = V J _-~- L ;r '~ ____ II P G ..:~ VACATED E. S. iY. _`` N E NO C~43 1 G , 1 _~ ; ~ . .- - r ~ ~ ~ --,- ~~' 4 BLOCK 3 3 . S:E NOTE ys ~~ SHEETr7 OF 3 ~ r ROANOKE COUNTY L08GRIDGE sIIBDIVISIOx ENGINEERING & FRAHIC D. PORTER, II_I and BEVERLY V. POSTER INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT ~""' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 23, 1995 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE EXCHANGE OF CERTAIN REAL ESTATE WITH FRANK D. PORTER III AND BEVERLY V. PORTER, HIS WIFE, IN CONNECTION WITH THE "LONGRIDGE" SUBDIVISION, AND THE SOUTH LOOP WATER TRANSMISSION LINE WHEREAS, Frank D. Porter, III and Beverly V. Porter, his wife, (hereinafter referred to as "Porter") desire to develop approximately 34.962 acres of real estate for the purpose of a residential subdivision known as "Longridge;" and WHEREAS, in order to successfully develop this property Porter requires from the County the conveyance of certain interests in real estate; and WHEREAS, the County requires Porter to convey to it easements for the purpose of the installation of the South Loop Main Water Transmission Line; and WHEREAS, Porter petitions the County to adopt this ordinance pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 and Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter in order to achieve their respective and mutual goals; and that the real estate in question does not conflict with other public uses and will ultimately serve a public purpose, and are hereby declared to be surplus; and, WHEREAS, the County's acquisition of utility easements and other real estate interests constitutes a fair consideration for the conveyance of other County real estate interests to Porter; and, ~.. s ~ WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on May 9, 1995, and the second reading and public hearing was held on May 23, 1995. BE IT ORDAINED By the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia: 1. That Porter shall convey to the County an easement for the installation of water and sewer utility lines by the recordation of a subdivision plat for the development of the Longridge Subdivision. The recordation of the final subdivision plat and the conveyance of these utility easements to the County shall occur no later than June 30, 1995. 2. That Porter shall complete the rough grading for the road network in the Longridge Subdivision by July 28, 1995. The completion of the rough grading of this site is a prerequisite for the County's installation of the water transmission line. Time is of the essence with respect to this provision of the ordinance. 3. That the Board hereby authorizes the acceptance of the conveyance from Porter of Parcel "E" as shown on a preliminary plat dated 22 February 1995 prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C. 4. That the Board hereby authorizes the acceptance of the conveyance and release of a private access easement across Parcel "A" as shown on a preliminary subdivision plat dated 22 February 1995 prepared by Lumsden and Associates, P.C. 5. That in consideration for these conveyances and site preparation the Board hereby authorizes the conveyance to Porter of the following parcels of real estate identified as "D," "F," and ,,T_ i "G" as shown on a preliminary plat dated 22 February 1995 prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C. 6. That the Board by separate ordinance shall vacate a portion of Carolyn Circle approximately 600 feet in length and shall vacate all of Copeland Drive, approximately 220 feet in length. 7. That the County Administrator, or his designee, is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as may be necessary to accomplish the exchanges, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. g:\...\may9.95\portlong.ord I r ' ~'. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 23, 1995 ORDINANCE 52395-6 AUTHORIZING THE DONATION BY LEASE OF OFFICE SPACE IN THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER TO THE FRIENDS OF THE BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY WHEREAS, Sections 15.1-24 and 15.1-25 of the Code of Virginia authorize the governing bodies of counties, cities and towns to make appropriations of public funds, of personal property, or of real estate to any charitable or nonprofit institution or organization, provided such organization is not controlled in whole or in part by any church or sectarian society; and WHEREAS, these sections of the State Code provide authority for the Board of Supervisors to donate valuable office space in the Roanoke County Administration Center (RCAC) to the Friends of the Blue Ridge Parkway; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors has determined that certain office space in the RCAC is temporarily surplus and available for other public uses, and that the donation by lease of this office space to this charitable, non-profit organization will serve other public uses; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of § 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading of an ordinance authorizing the donation and use of County real estate was held on May 9, 1995. The second reading on this matter was held on May 23, 1995. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1 1. That it is in the County's best interests to enter into a lease agreement for the use of valuable office space located at 5204 Bernard Drive in the Roanoke County Administration Center by the Friends of the Blue Ridge Parkway. This lease agreement shall be terminable at will by the County and the use of this property shall be limited to office uses for the charitable and non-profit purposes of this organization. 2. That the County Administrator is authorized to negotiate and to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the charitable purposes of this transaction, all of which shall be upon a form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: 7~~'La.-try-~ ~. Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Richard Burrow, Friends of the Blue Ridge 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 23, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE OFFICE SPACE IN THE ROANOKE CENTER TO THE FRIENDS OF THE DONATION BY LEASE OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY' This ordinance authorizes the donation by lease of office space in the Roanoke County Administration Center (RCAC) to the Friends of the Blue Ridge Parkway. It is proposed that this lease of office space in the RCAC be accomplished by a lease agreement which is revocable at will by the County. BACKGROUND' Friends of the Blue Ridge Parkway is a non-profit, Sec. 501(c)(3) volunteer organization, dedicated to preserving, protecting and promoting the Blue Ridge Parkway through conservation, preservation, education and advocacy. Friends has been instrumental in the Parkway Coalition, working with Roanoke County, Blue Ridge Parkway officials and private developers to resolve critical viewshed and Parkway protection issues. Roanoke County would like to help Friends further their work in the County, in Virginia, and along the entire 473 miles of the Parkway. Providing office space will put the Friends main office in Virginia, for the first time in two years, with an auxiliary office in North Carolina. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Sections 15.1-24 and 15.1-25 of the Code of Virginia authorize the governing bodies of counties, cities and towns to make appropriations of public funds, of personal property, or of real estate to any charitable or nonprofit institution or organization, provided such organization is not controlled in whole or in part by any church or sectarian society. These Code sections provide authority for the Board of Supervisors to donate valuable office space in the RCAC to the Friends of the Blue Ridge Parkway. The Board must first determine that such office space is surplus and available for other uses. Next the Board must adopt an 1 ~' ordinance authorizing this donation of County real estate to this charitable organization. Staff proposes a lease terminable at will by either party. The Friends' use of this office space will be limited to approximately 300 square feet, the County would provide all utility, janitorial and maintenance .services. The ordinance authorizes staff to negotiate an appropriate lease with the Friends of the Blue Ridge Parkway for this donated lease of office space. The first reading of this ordinance is scheduled for May 9, 1995, and the second reading is scheduled for May 23, 1995. FISCAL IMPACTS' The current rental value of office space in RCAC is $10.00 per square foot, including utilities, janitorial and maintenance, and the County is providing this organization approximately 300 square feet of office space. ALTERNATIVES' The Board may either: 1) adopt the proposed ordinance and donate by lease this office space to the Friends of the Blue Ridge Parkway; or 2) it may decline to adopt the proposed ordinance. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The County Administrator recommends that the Board favorably consider the adoption of the attached ordinance. Respectfully submitted, 4~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to friendbr.rpt Motion by Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens Minnix Vote No Yes Aba 2 ~~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 23, 1995 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE DONATION BY LEASE OF OFFICE SPACE IN THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER TO THE FRIENDS OF THE BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY WHEREAS, Sections 15.1-24 and 15.1-25 of the Code of Virginia authorize the governing bodies of counties, cities and towns to make appropriations of public funds, of personal property, or of real estate to any charitable or nonprofit institution or organization, provided such organization is not controlled in whole or in part by any church or sectarian society; and WHEREAS, these sections of the State Code provide authority for the Board of Supervisors to donate valuable office space in the Roanoke County Administration Center (RCAC) to the Friends of the Blue Ridge Parkway; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors has determined that certain office space in the RCAC is temporarily surplus and available for other public uses, and that the donation by lease of this office space to this charitable, non-profit organization will serve other public uses; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of § 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading of an ordinance authorizing the donation and use of County real estate was held on May 9, 1995. The second reading on this matter was held on May 23, 1995. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That it is in the County's best interests to enter into a lease agreement for the use of valuable office space located at S-~ 5204 Bernard Drive in the Roanoke County Administration Center by the Friends of the Blue Ridge Parkway. This lease agreement shall be terminable at will by the County and the use of this property shall be limited to office uses for the charitable and non-profit purposes of this organization. 2. That the County Administrator is authorized to negotiate and to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the charitable purposes of this transaction, all of which shall be upon a form approved by the County Attorney. g:\...\may9.95\friendbr.ord ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 23, 1995 ORDINANCE 52395-12 DECLARING SEVERAL PARCELS OF REAL ESTATE TO BE SURPLUS AND ACCEPTING OFFERS FOR THE SALE OF SAME BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject properties, having been made available for other public uses before permitting disposition by sale, are hereby declared to be surplus. 2. That an advertisement for bids for the sale of surplus real estate was advertised in the Roanoke Times & World News on April 9, 1995. 3. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading of this ordinance was held on May 9, 1995; and a second reading was held on May 23, 1995, concerning the disposition of the following parcels of real estate identified as follows: Algoma Park Tax Map Parcel No. 87.06-2-22 Ardmore Tax Map Parcel No. 28.09-2-40 Hunting Hills Tax Map Parcel No. 88.13-3-28 Penn Forest Tax Map Parcel No. 87.06-6-1 4. That offers fo r said properties having been received, the offers of ":t'1~~~'s'~'~~~~'a'a~[k~<><', to purchase *~es= „M „=r}___ ~t`~ri~"' l e... ~'o erg.......a~..~ta.::>:~arce;l<:::~o ~`~~~~<~3`<~~?-~~ for the sum o f !~'h ~ r:~:::: .......-..-.-....fir. ~'housa:nd:<::~c1:~r:s:><:: is hereby accepted,'..; .='..a , and:;:a~:l::<:>:~sther:<::;af`:f:er~ 1 5. That the purchase price for the property shall be paid upon delivery of a deed therefor and all proceeds from the sale of this real estate are to be paid into the capital improvements fund. 6. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the sale of said property, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 7. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt the ordinance to accept only the bid of $30,000 from Thomas Newcomb for Hunting Hills Real Estate Tax Map Parcel #88.13-3-28, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None PRESENT: Supervisor Johnson A COPY TESTE: .~• L~~.G-e2w Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance John W. Willey, Property Manager 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 23, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE DECLARING SEVERAL PARCELS OF REAL ESTATE TO BE SURPLUS AND ACCEPTING OFFERS FOR THE SALE OF SAME COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This is the second reading of an ordinance to sell four surplus well lots, in response to the receipt of offers for same. BACKGROUND' On October 25, 1994, the Board adopted a policy for the sale or disposal of surplus real estate. Many of the parcels identified as surplus are well lots to be abandoned with the completion of the reservoir and the water transmission lines. This procedure provided for the annual advertisement and publication of the surplus real estate list, inviting bids from the public. This notice and list of properties was advertised in the Roanoke Times & World News on April 9, 1995. Once an offer is received, staff submits the offer to the Board of Supervisors in executive session after evaluation by the County Administrator, County Attorney and Property Manager. If the Board wishes to proceed, then the County Attorney prepares an appropriate ordinance for first reading, which constitutes notice that a bona fide offer has been received, and that other written offers may be received until 5:00 p.m, the Friday preceding the next Board meeting. The identity of the offerors) and the amount, terms or conditions of the offer(s) or bid(s) shall be kept confidential until the second reading. At second reading the Board may accept the best offer received or reject all offers. 1 J- 3 SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: On April 25, 1995 the County received four offers for surplus real estate. These parcels of real estate are identified as follows: Algoma Park Ardmore Hunting Hills Penn Forest FISCAL IMPACTS' Tax Map Parcel No. Tax Map Parcel No. Tax Map Parcel No. Tax Map Parcel No. 87.06-2-22 28.09-2-40 88.13-3-28 87.06-6-1 Pursuant to Section 16.01 of the Roanoke County Charter, the proceeds from the sale of capital facilities, including real estate, shall be paid into capital facility accounts and expended therefrom solely for the purpose of acquisition, construction, maintenance or replacement of other capital facilities. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board favorably consider the adoption of the attached ordinance. Respectfully submitted, ~~iG Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens Minnix Vote No Yes Abs 2 J ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 23, 1995 ORDINANCE DECLARING SEVERAL PARCELS OF REAL ESTATE TO BE SURPLUS AND ACCEPTING OFFERS FOR THE SALE OF SAME BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject properties, having been made available for other public uses before permitting disposition by sale, are hereby declared to be surplus. 2. That an advertisement for bids for the sale of surplus real estate was advertised in the Roanoke Times & World News on April 9, 1995. 3. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading of this ordinance was held on May 9, 1995; and a second reading was held on May 23, 1995, concerning the disposition of the following parcels of real estate identified as follows: Algoma Park Tax Map Parcel No. 87.06-2-22 Ardmore Tax Map Parcel No. 28.09-2-40 Hunting Hills Tax Map Parcel No. 88.13-3-28 Penn Forest Tax Map Parcel No. 87.06-6-1 4. That offers for said properties having been received, the offers of to purchase these properties for the sum of Dollars is hereby accepted/rejected. ~- 5. That the purchase price for the property shall be paid upon delivery of a deed therefor and all proceeds from the sale of this real estate are to be paid into the capital improvements fund. 6. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the sale of said property, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 7. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. g:...\may9.95\surpsale.ord ~ ~ ~- `~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 23, 1995 ORDINANCE 52395-7 AUTHORIZING THE FINANCING OF A LOCAL PUBLIC WORKS IMPROVEMENT, BONSACR COMMUNITY SEWER EXTENSION, FOR MICHAEL DUNN WHEREAS, Ordinance 112288-7 authorizes the financing of local public works improvements and the imposition of special assessments upon abutting property owners upon the adoption of an appropriate ordinance by the Board of Supervisors; and WHEREAS, the County Administration has negotiated the extension of the public sewer system to three residents of the Bonsack community; and WHEREAS, the extension of the public sewer system will alleviate a critical public health and safety problem; and WHEREAS, one of the residents, Michael Dunn, of 4612 Bonsack Road, has requested that the County allow him to pay his portion of the costs of connection to the public sewer system over ten years in accordance with the provisions of Ordinance 112288-7; and WHEREAS, the first reading of the Ordinance was held on May 9, 1995; and the second reading was held on May 23, 1995. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia as follows: 1. That the Board authorizes and approves a local public works improvement project namely, public sewer extension for a portion of the Bonsack community. The total cost of this public sewer project is estimated to be Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20,000.00) plus off-site facilities 1 i ~ fees of Three Thousand Dollars (3,000.00); however, the County agrees that the total cost of the project including off-site facility fees and credits shall not exceed Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20,000.00). 2. That the Board authorizes and approves the payment by Michael Dunn, of 4612 Bonsack Road, of his portion of the cost of extending the public sewer system in accordance with the following terms and conditions: Payment of Six Thousand Six Hundred and Sixty-Seven Dollars ($6,667) over ten (10) years at an interest rate of nine (9~) percent per annum. 3. That Emory H. Robinson shall pay one-third of the estimated construction cost of $20,000.00 dollars, one- half upon the execution of an agreement with the County and one-half upon completion of construction. 4. That Edwin M. Cook shall pay one-third of the estimated construction cost of $20,000.00 dollars, one-half upon the execution of an agreement with the County and one- half upon completion of construction. 5. That the County Administrator is authorized to take such actions and execute such documents as may be necessary to accomplish the purposes of this transaction, all upon form approved by the County Attorney. 6. That this Ordinance shall take effect on and from the date of its adoption. 2 On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: 7 Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Gary L. Robertson, Utility Director Diane D. Hyatt, Finance Director 3 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. -" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 23, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE FINANCING OF A LOCAL PUBLIC WORKS IMPROVEMENT, BONSACK COMMUNITY SEWER EXTENSION, FOR MICHAEL DUNN COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: L/"""`~ ~~~N EXECUTIVE SUNIlKARY This ordinance approves a public works project namely Bonsack Community Sewer Extension, and authorizes the financing of the cost of these improvements over a ten year period of time by one of the property owners benefiting from this project. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Three residents of the Bonsack Community contacted the County for assistance with respect to resolving a public health problem, namely the release of raw sewage into the environment. Only one of these three residents can install a septic system meeting the requirements of the Health Department. The construction costs for this extension of the public sewer system is estimated to be Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20,000.00) plus off-site facility fees (3 @ $1,000.00) of $3,000.00 with a total cost of $23,000.00. The County Administrator negotiated with the three property owners a total cost including off-site facility fees and credits not to exceed $20,000.00 so that each party would be required to pay $6,667.00. The $3,000.00 cost difference will be resolved by a combination of the following methods: (a) the Utility Director credited 25~ of the off-site fees towards the construction cost in accordance with the off-site credit policy; (b) the Utility Department staff performed engineering and survey work in-house; and (c) working with the contractor to reduce costs. If the actual construction costs are less than the estimated amount, the property owners would be given the benefit of the actual cost, if the actual costs exceeds $20,000.00, the County would be responsible for any increase. 1 .1-~ Initially each property owner was to pay their portion one- half upon the execution of an agreement with the County and the balance due upon completion of the construction. Since that time, one of the property owners has requested that the County allow him to pay his portion of this cost over 10 years in accordance with the provisions of Ordinance 112288-7. The Board may recall that Ordinance 112288-7 authorized certain procedures for the financing of local public works improvements, authorized the imposition of special assessments upon abutting property owners, and provided for certain procedural protections. This ordinance also provided that approval of such a public works project and its financing may be authorized by the board upon the adoption of an appropriate ordinance. The first reading of the Ordinance was held on May 9, 1995. FISCAL IMPACTS• Actual construction costs and off-site facility fees will be collected from the three property owners benefitting from this public sewer system extension up to $20,000.00. If this ordinance is approved, the Board would need to authorize expenditures of $6,667.00 from the unappropriated balance of the sewer fund. These funds would be reimbursed from Mr. Dunn's monthly payments. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt the Ordinance after the second reading authorizing the financing of a local public works improvement, Bonsack Community Sewer Extension, for Michael Dunn. Respectfully submitted, Gary Ro ertson, P.E. Utility Director Approved by: ~! Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Action Vote No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Rohinke Nickens Minnix 2 pay. ~.. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 23, 1995 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE FINANCING OF A LOCAL PUBLIC WORKS IMPROVEMENT, BONSACK COMMUNITY SEWER EXTENSION, FOR MICHAEL DUNN WHEREAS, Ordinance 112288-7 authorizes the financing of local public works improvements and the imposition of special assessments upon abutting property owners upon the adoption of an appropriate ordinance by the Board of Supervisors; and WHEREAS, the County Administration has negotiated the extension of the public sewer system to three residents of the Bonsack community; and WHEREAS, the extension of the public sewer system will alleviate a critical public health and safety problem; and WHEREAS, one of the residents, Michael Dunn, of 4612 Bonsack Road, has requested that the County allow him to pay his portion of the costs of connection to the public sewer system over ten years in accordance with the provisions of Ordinance 112288-7; and WHEREAS, the first reading of the Ordinance was held on May 9, 1995; and the second reading was held on May 23, 1995. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia as follows: 1. That the Board authorizes and approves a local public works improvement project namely, public sewer extension for a portion of the Bonsack community. The total cost of this public sewer project is estimated to be Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20,000.00) plus off-site facilities fees of Three Thousand Dollars (3,000.00); however, the ~~~ County agrees that the total cost of the project including off-site facility fees and credits shall not exceed Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20,000.00). 2. That the Board authorizes and approves the payment by Michael Dunn, of 4612 Bonsack Road, of his portion of the cost of extending the public sewer system in accordance with the following terms and conditions: Payment of Six Thousand Six Hundred and Sixty-Seven Dollars ($6,667) over ten (10) years at an interest rate of nine (9%) percent per annum. 3. That Emory H. Robinson shall pay one-third of the estimated construction cost of $20,000.00 dollars, one- half upon the execution of an agreement with the County and one-half upon completion of construction. 4. That Edwin M. Cook shall pay one-third of the estimated construction cost of $20,000.00 dollars, one-half upon the execution of an agreement with the County and one- half upon completion of construction. 5. That the County Administrator is authorized to take such actions and execute such documents as may be necessary to accomplish the purposes of this transaction, all upon form approved by the County Attorney. 6. That this Ordinance shall take effect on and from the date of its adoption. g:...\may9.95\dunn.ord L ~~.~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 23, 1995 ORDINANCE 52395-8 AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTIONS 12-51 PENALTIES FOR PARKING VIOLATIONS AND 12-52 PARKING ON STREETS AND HIGHWAYS GENERALLY TO AUTHORIZE THE ENFORCEMENT OF ZONING VIOLATIONS INVOLVING THE UNLAWFUL PARKING OF VEHICLES BY THE ISSUANCE OF PARKING TICKETS FOR SUCH VIOLATIONS WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke's Zoning Ordinance, Sec. 30-91-2, prohibits the parking of certain trucks or commercial vehicles in AR and all Residential districts and requires the parking of all recreational vehicles, boats and utility trailers behind the front building lot line, unless in a completely enclosed garage or building; and WHEREAS, the enforcement provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, contained in Sec. 30-21 were drafted with a focus upon violations concerning parcels of real estate. This section requires a fifteen (15) day written notice from the zoning administrator and an opportunity for the property owner to correct any violation; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Police Department is frequently contacted by residents who observe violations of the Zoning Ordinance involving tractor-trailer trucks or other vehicles and the Department has raised questions regarding compliance with the notice requirements of this ordinance prior to issuance of any tickets or court summons; and WHEREAS, the mobility of trucks and other vehicles makes it necessary to provide law enforcement officers with the ability to issue parking tickets for such zoning violations without the necessity of advance written warning by the Zoning Administrator to t the vehicle owner; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on March 14, 1995, and the second reading was held on May 23, 1995. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, as follows: 1. That Section 12-51. Penalties for Parking Violations and Section 12-52. Parking on streets and highways generally of Article III. Parkinct of Chapter 12 MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC of the Roanoke County Code be amended and re-enacted, as follows: Sec. 12-51. Penalties for parking violations. Any person violating any of the provisions of this article shall be deemed guilty of a traffic infraction and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined according to the following schedule: Sec. 12-52. Parking on streets and highways generally. :::«<:>'~'~::>~~ ~~`~~':~~~ ~ ~:><'~!!~' Vii: ^ > `: `>:y<~> ;. ,.:...::; <~:.::. ~.:::: ~:: ~:; :.; :.:::::::..::: ~: ~ .>:>:. ,.:., ,> .<. ':' ,.:::':..„ : `' ~ ~:`.. . ~::::' ;~ ` ~~ 2 ~-~} An emergency vehicle or any personal vehicle operated by a law enforcement officer, firefighter, emergency medical services officer or county volunteer firefighter or rescue squad member responding to an emergency or a legitimate public safety need shall not be considered in violation of this section. 2. This ordinance shall be effective from the date of its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: Supervisor Eddy A COPY TESTE: .~o! ~ C.Llt~~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 3 Roanoke County Code Distribution: cc: File Circuit Court G. O. Clemens, Judge, Roy B. Willett, Judge Clifford R. Weckstein, Judge Diane McQ. Strickland, Judge Richard C. Pattisall, Judge Robert P. Doherty, Jr., Judge Steven A. McGraw, Clerk Juvenile Domestic Relations District Court Joseph M. Clarke, II, Judge Philip Trompeter, Judge John B. Ferguson, Judge Joseph P. Bounds, Judge Ruth P. Bates, Clerk Intake Counsellor General District Court John L. Apostolou, Judge George W. Harris, Judge William Broadhurst, Judge Vincent Lilley, Judge Theresa A. Childress, Clerk Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Magistrates Sherri Krantz/Betty Perry Main Library John H. Cease, Police Chief Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke 24016 Roanoke County Code Book Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance O. Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Gary L. Robertson, Director, Utility Michael Lazzuri, Court Services Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue Thomas C. Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue Bill Rand, Director, General Services Thomas S. Haislip, Director, Parks & Recreation Elaine Carver, Director, Procurement John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment 4 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 23, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTIONS 12-51 PENALTIES FOR PARKING VIOLATIONS AND 12-52 PARKING ON STREETS AND HIGHWAYS GENERALLY TO AUTHORIZE THE ENFORCEMENT OF ZONING VIOLATIONS INVOLVING THE UNLAWFUL PARKING OF VEHICLES BY THE ISSUANCE OF PARKING TICKETS FOR SUCH VIOLATIONS COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: '~..~ i7rh~ ~~~FVw" ~ CY! r, • ~~` ~~~~ BACKGROUND' The overnight parking of trucks or commercial vehicles having more than two rear wheels is prohibited in the AR district and all residential districts by the Zoning Ordinance. The same section requires that recreational vehicles, boats and utility trailers be parked behind the front building lot line. The enforcement provisions of the Zoning Ordinance requires the Zoning Administrator to notify a property owner in writing of any violations of the ordinance and to give them up to 15 days to correct such violation. A second written notice is then required if there is no correction. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Roanoke County Police Department is often the agency contacted by residents complaining about trucks or vehicles parked in residential neighborhoods. Within the past two years the department has received numerous complaints concerning tractor trailers parked in residential neighborhoods in the County. It sometimes takes a police officer several days to learn the identity of the truck's driver. Obviously, the mobility of trucks and other vehicles makes reliance on written notice from the Zoning Administrator of doubtful effectiveness in cases of repeated and deliberate violations. The proposed amendments to the County's parking ordinance would treat parking of a tractor trailer or semi- trailer in the same manner as other existing parking restrictions. The penalty of $15.00 for a violation is consistent with the majority of other parking offenses in the County code. The police department will develop a policy to require officers to make reasonable efforts to give at least one warning to the driver of a truck on a public street prior to issuance of a ticket or summons. ~-5 FISCAL IMPACT' Any anticipated revenue increase from fines is expected to be minor. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The alternatives available to the Board are as follows: I. Adopt the proposed ordinance amendments and permit the Roanoke County Police Department to issue tickets for parking violations by tractor trailers and other vehicles in residential and AR zoning districts. II. Do not adopt the proposed amendments and continue to provide for written warnings from the Zoning Administrator to all residents illegally parking tractor trailers or other vehicles prior to initiating further enforcement action. Respectfully submitted, J eph ~. Obenshain S for ssistant County Attorney ----------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred Kohinke to Minnix Nickens ~.~J AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 23, 1995 ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTIONS 12-51 PENALTIES FOR PARKING VIOLATIONS AND 12-52 PARKING ON STREETS AND HIGHWAYS GENERALLY TO AUTHORIZE THE ENFORCEMENT OF ZONING VIOLATIONS INVOLVING THE UNLAWFUL PARKING OF VEHICLES BY THE ISSUANCE OF PARKING TICKETS FOR SUCH VIOLATIONS WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke's Zoning Ordinance, Sec. 30-91-2, prohibits the parking of certain trucks or commercial vehicles in AR and all Residential districts and requires the parking of all recreational vehicles, boats and utility trailers behind the front building lot line, unless in a completely enclosed garage or building; and WHEREAS, the enforcement provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, contained in Sec. 30-21 were drafted with a focus upon violations concerning parcels of real estate. This section requires a fifteen (15) day written notice from the zoning administrator and an opportunity for the property owner to correct any violation; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Police Department is frequently contacted by residents who observe violations of the Zoning Ordinance involving tractor-trailer trucks or other vehicles and the Department has raised questions regarding compliance with the notice requirements of this ordinance prior to issuance of any tickets or court summons; and WHEREAS, the mobility of trucks and other vehicles makes it necessary to provide law enforcement officers with the ability to issue parking tickets for such zoning violations without the ~S necessity of advance written warning by the Zoning Administrator to the vehicle owner; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on March 14, 1995, and the second reading was held on May 23, 1995. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, as follows: 1. That Section 12-51. Penalties for Parking Violations and Section 12-52. Parking on streets and highways generally of Article III. Parkina of Chapter 12 MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC of the Roanoke County Code be amended and re-enacted, as follows: sec. 12-51. Penalties for parking violations. Any person violating any of the provisions of this article shall be deemed guilty of a traffic infraction and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined according to the following schedule: Park~.ng a tractor-~traa.~.~r t~ue~~ ~em~. traa:~:e~ f ~ecreata.4n~, vehicle, boat er utility v~:h~.cle can ...::any publ~.c'"`stz~~e~.n violation cif 'sec: 12.52 >~......r ,y+~ 1/[~,~ Sec. 12-52. Parking on streets and highways generally. 2 ,. r~./'_ '~ services officer or county volunteer firefighter or rescue squad member responding to an emergency or a legitimate public safety need shall not be considered in violation of this section. 2. This ordinance shall be effective from the date of its adoption. 3 ~ ~O AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 23, 1995 ORDINANCE 52395-9 AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTIONS 4-4, DEFINITIONS, 4-10, OPERATIONS, 4-il SECURITY, 4-12 SAFETY AND RESCUE EQUIPMENT; OTHER SAFETY FEATURES, AND 4-13, ENTRY AND INSPECTIONS. ENFORCEMENT. PENALTIES OF ARTICLE I IN GENERAL, OF CHAPTER 4 AMIISEMENTS, OF THE ROANORE COUNTY CODE TO CONFORM THIS ORDINANCE WITH STATE POSTING REGULATIONS FOR WATER QUALITY AND TO PROVIDE AUTHORITY TO THE HEALTH DIRECTOR TO NEGOTIATE RECOMMENDATIONS AT EACH POOL SITE ON ISSUES RELATED TO PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY WITHOUT EBERCISE OF REGULATORY OR ENFORCEMENT POWERS WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia adopted Ordinance 62894-18 to add certain sections to the Roanoke County Code in order to clarify the legal authority of the Roanoke County Health Department to carry out courtesy inspections of public swimming pools to insure their operation is in accordance with Virginia Department of Health regulations governing such pools; and WHEREAS, since the adoption of this ordinance, the Virginia Department of Health has adopted regulations governing the posting of water quality test results which contain requirements which are less stringent that those contained in the county's ordinance, but other state regulations dealing with safety issues have been held in abeyance for the foreseeable future; and WHEREAS, experience gained during the administration of the county's ordinance over one operating season has produced suggestions for improvements of some provisions of this ordinance, and the Health Department wishes to proceed for the 1995-96 season with the authority to receive applications and issue permits and to negotiate recommendations addressing health and safety concerns at each pool but to refrain from the exercise of any regulatory enforcement powers; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on May 9, 1995; a second reading was held on May 23, 1995. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Article I. In General of Chapter 5, AMUSEMENTS of the Roanoke County Code be amended and reenacted to read and provide as follows: Sec 4-4. Definitions. For the purposes of this article, the following words and phrases shall have the meaning ascribed to them by this section, unless otherwise indicated to the contrary: Public swimming pool: Shall mean any swimming pool, other than 2 used exclusively for therapeutic purposes. Sec. 4-10. Operation. (a) Each swimming pool owner shall require an operator to be available except when the pool is out of service. (b) Lifeguard(s) shall be required and present at all times during operation based on the following criteria: (1) pools of 2, 000 square feet of ~` surface area or more and open for use - minimum of one (1) lifeguard; (4) pools with a ?rr,#E~`: surface area of less than 2, 000 ~~~~ square feet,"`arid having less than 75 swimmers present shall be required to provide a designated supervisor to oversee swimmer activity provided, however, that a sign is posted as follows: ~~Warninq; No Lifeguard on Duty. Children under the age of 14 should not be allowed to use the pool without an adult in attendance.~~ (~) pools.......of......less than 1, 000 square feet ~' ~`~``><~e': may be used without a designated ~1'~eguard~~~~i~f"gall of the following criteria are met: a. children under 14 years of age are not allowed to use the pool unless accompanied by an adult; b. no one shall be allowed to be in the pool alone; c. a sign be posted exactly as stated in (b)(3) above. .....................:............... w:::. ~:1;::::::::.y ..; ......:}iiiiW..,,...'•ii+i}i.~.y.-:....y.1.~.:..{:ivSii ~~;:~'t:. ii: :{:: ii»iii:; ~ ~. :iiiiiii. ~ " :. v. '. :;. .iii. :"'{p}::::, :. .. '::•::::: ''.c :% ~~y:' ::.~'4:::i:}ii:: '. :y]',:~.i::i:t:i::itt " i~.:•~::jttt:::~9M::~:~.~.i:.i:.i:.:~~:.i:.i:.ii~~i.: ..:Jvl:,~i::::i::i:1ii.I::::i::::i::1GA: Y:;~:i::ii:::{A ~~~1T{21i;.~,rv~,i,~,,..'<6iii~-:•:.i}:': y::: ~ .:::.:::::::::::::.~::::::::::::::::::::::.:::::::::. ~:::::: y::. ~::n n......::v::::::::.~::.~::::::: i::::::: i::::::::::::::: 3 (c) Operators and lifeguards shall be required to possess a current certification meeting the current standard for a pool operator or lifeguard as recommended by the National Recreation and Park Association, the American Red Cross or other accredited agency (d) A bound log shall be maintained by the swimming pool operator on the premises which shall contain the time and dates of the chemical test performed, results of those tests and initials of the persons who performed the necessary testing. The log shall be retained for a period of twelve (12) months. 1. The log shall include the following at the specified intervals: a. all chemicals added, including quantity and time added - as needed; b. personnel and changes in personnel - as necessary; c. injuries - as necessary; d. maintenance operations including backwashing and vacuuming - as necessary; e. disinfectant levels - every `':;~``?~: ................... . _ xe= "` hours; :-: f. Ph balance - every ~'~``c~~~'`: three ~T 4 hours; g. stabilizer -weekly; h. alkalinity and calcium hardness -weekly. (e) Swimmer load shall not exceed a density of one (1) person per twenty-seven (27) square feet of pool surface area. (f) Animals, fowl and/or pets shall not be permitted within the pool area. This section shall not apply to working dogs, such as seeing eye dogs. Sec. 4-11. Security. ~`..~.. •::::.th~.::::.~ GeE.:.~.~..f~l'~:.;;:;~~:.::.::..:t'3.L,3:~,.~.::::~T23:.:::::~~1Q:.;:.;:::~:~E3'~C:~.:~8~.>:.>:.; :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.~::::I~: ::.............................................................. ?, all entrances and exits to the pool area shall be secured against entry whenever a pool is not in operation. The fence or other security provisions shall be maintained and in good a Ever ....u'~~.i.~ swimmin ool shall bee i ed with the ..:.................... following aids to safety and rescue which shall be readily accessible at all times: (4) A readily accessible room or area designated and equipped e of casualties. ~~:>?a«'~'~~'<rz~`<' for emergency car ~_;:;.;:;.»::>..>..»»»>::~:::~:::::~>..>..»>;:.,»:~~::~:~::~~> 5 ::i::ii::::::gy';::iii::::::::::::q:}:iii{::i::i::i:::::::: ~::::;..".::;::;:;x;;::;:;}: ::isj::i:'vi`~::j':ri::i::}:i::i:::S:ii::i::i::}'::+isi>«:'i::::i::i::i::Yi:::::i:::ji; ;:::'::; '•i:::::'. .... !!••~~~~ {{~~11~~ ~' ~iiFi ~' ii}i~y{'y', '~~'~~ all be the ent sh ~~~< Minimum e i m first aid kit previously required, a ~~'_'_-'_~„;}'_' ~~ and 2 blankets. (6) On all swimming pools, the depth of the water shall be marked plainly at or above the water surface on the vertical wall of the swimming pool and on the edge of the deck next to the swimming pool. Numbers and letters shall be ~~``'~a~r~~'`<?~~ § inches in size and of a good area. Sec. 4-13. Entry and Inspections; Enforcement; Penalties. (a) In accordance with the provisions of § 32.1-25 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, the Health Director or his designee shall have the right to enter any property to conduct 6 inspections and to ensure compliance with this ordinance. All public swimming pools in the county may commence operations each year only after being inspected by the Health Director or his designee and receiving a permit from the Director and after complying with all licensing requirements of the Commissioner of the Revenue. The Health Director is authorized to require each owner to complete and submit an annual application, all in such form as the Director shall approve. -~e~r-app-~rea~e~ ~~~" '~~ crcccznpurrre~-19~-~~eczir-crre-a~9urarc-i-vrz~rrarrcrrca-vv-s rur ~ :r , ze- ga-~~i-a ~-~~e~e~e-~e~~~-t-h~--~s~f. e~ s ~ r ~ ~ ~' ; (b) When the Health Director finds that any condition exists that endangers the life, health or safety of the users of any public swimming pool, he may order the facility closed until the 7 2. This ordinance shall be effective from the date of its passage. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: Supervisor Eddy A COPY TESTE: T~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 9 Roanoke County Code Distribution: cc: File Dr. Margaret L. Rutledge, Director, Alleghany Health District Circuit Court G. O. Clemens, Judge, Roy B. Willett, Judge Clifford R. Weckstein, Judge Diane McQ. Strickland, Judge Richard C. Pattisall, Judge Robert P. Doherty, Jr., Judge Steven A. McGraw, Clerk Juvenile Domestic Joseph M. Clarke, Philip Trompeter, John B. Ferguson, Joseph P. Bounds, Ruth P. Bates, Cl~ Intake Counsellor Relations District Court II, Judge Judge Judge Judge irk General District Court John L. Apostolou, Judge George W. Harris, Judge William Broadhurst, Judge Vincent Lilley, Judge Theresa A. Childress, Clerk Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Magistrates Sherri Krantz/Betty Perry Main Library John H. Cease, Police Chief Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke 24016 Roanoke County Code Book Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance O. Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Gary L. Robertson, Director, Utility Michael Lazzuri, Court Services Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue Thomas C. Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue Bill Rand, Director, General Services Thomas S. Haislip, Director, Parks & Recreation Elaine Carver, Director, Procurement John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment 10 . ~ ACTION # ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 23, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTIONS 4-4, DEFINITIONS, 4-10, OPERATIONS, 4-11, SECURITY, 4-12, SAFETY AND RESCUE EQUIPMENT; OTHER SAFETY FEATURES, AND 4-13, ENTRY AND INSPECTION ENFORCEMENT. PENALTIES OF ARTICLE I IN GENERAL, OF CHAPTER 4 AMUSEMENTS, OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO CONFORM THIS ORDINANCE WITH STATE POSTING REGULATIONS FOR WATER QUALITY AND TO PROVIDE AUTHORITY TO THE HEALTH DIRECTOR TO NEGOTIATE RECOMMENDATIONS AT EACH POOL SITE ON ISSUES RELATED TO PUBLIC HEALTH .AND SAFETY WITHOUT EXERCISE OF REGULATORY OR ENFORCEMENT POWERS COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Recommend Approval. However, I have some concern that an "advisory ordinance" may be confusing and create an expectation on the part of the public that cannot be enforced. BACKGROUND' On June 28, 1994, the Board. of Supervisors adopted additions to the Roanoke County Code authorizing the Health Department to conduct inspections of public swimming pools operating in the County. Subsequently, the Virginia Department of Health has adopted "posting" regulations for various water quality factors which are less stringent than the requirements in the current county code. In addition, numerous comments have been received from owners of pools covered by these code sections and from companies which service such pools with requests for changes in the ordinance provisions. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: After a series of meetings attended by County citizens involved in the ownership, operation or servicing of swimming pools used by members of the public, differences still remain as to the final language proposed for amending several of the current ordinance sections. The Roanoke County Health Department is recommending that it operate its inspection program during the 1995 swimming season in the form of a recommendation process. (See *,~ attached letter from Molly L. Rutledge, M.D., Director, Alleghany and Roanoke City Health Districts.) The Health Department would still have the authority to receive applications, conduct inspections of public swimming pools and issue permits. However, it would not exercise any direct enforcement powers but would work with each pool to develop a unique set of recommendations for this pool season that would promote safety and health in that pool's operation. The current ordinance requirements, with the few amendments proposed based upon a current consensus of opinion, would serve as a guideline or basis from which this recommendation process would proceed. Using the experience gained from the inspections conducted this year, the Health Department will work with interested citizens next Fall and Winter to further refine the health and safety requirements. As a result of the meetings with County citizens and of changes in state regulations, changes to the County's swimming pool ordinance are proposed in the following area: 1. Pool operations: Attempts to clarify the requirements as to number of life guards on duty and allows more flexibility in replacing pool operators. 2. Posting requirements - "Ph" & disinfectant levels: To bring the County's ordinance into conformity with the new state regulations "Governing the Posting of Water Quality Test Results", subsection (d) of Sec 4-10 is amended to only require tests of the Ph and disinfectant or chlorine levels in a pool once a day or every 24 hours. 3. Safety equipment and pool markings: Responds to concerns regarding requirements as to first aid equipment and current construction standards for pool markings. Concerns have been expressed regarding a "full-length backboard" which might be improperly used by untrained individuals. An additional area of concern expressed is the requirement for first aid kits and public telephones. 4. Enforcement: Specifies rights of pool owners to receive specific written notice of violations and an opportunity to respond. Clarifies authority of Health Director to negotiate corrective steps and defines time limits on appeals. FISCAL IMPACT• A minimal financial loss to the County's general fund is anticipated at this time. These amendments remove the $100.00 fee charged by the Health Department for inspections during this transition year. ~- ~ STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of the Health Department's proposal to negotiate recommendations with pool owners/operators for the 1995 pool season to permit more time to bring forward additional amendments to the current pool ordinance provisions. Respectfully submitted, Jo ph ~.`Obenshain S 'or Assistant County Attorney ----------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred Kohinke to Minnix Nickens _ FROM 60TETOURT HD 95. 04.1?95 10:0: P. 1 ,~'" i i+r ALLEGHANY HEALTH DISTRICT T•l, ~~~-~~ Rer w. es~-0~t p. ~. Box 220 Moey c. woes Fint;astle, VA 24090 - tu.ota- erector 8srvh+0 the People ol; Petty P. Tnler Allpheny Courtly AdmY+Ntr~tor Bobtoun County R ;t°„C0,"~~„ty PLEASE NOTE OUR NEW TELF.I'HONE NUMBIrR$ N~~ ~~o~ cta a cotton rorpe Telephone: {7Q~)47~-8226 A. M.'Mo• oW«, City 01 Covlnpton Gty of Belem Fat:simlle: (703)473.822 ~^'~~^ ""•^'~'r l4ancy 8. Flervey May 4, 1995 Nurse Precntsor»r 6+teneQer Mr. Joseph B. Obenshaln County Attorney County of Roanoke Administration Center P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Vir~lnla 24018-0798 RE: Roanoke County Swimming Poo! Ordinance Dear Joe: As a result of the customer reaalon to the Implementatlan of the Roanoke County Sw(mrning Poof Ordinance and as a result of the meeting on the evening of May 1, 1995, I would like to suggest to the Board of Supervisors that the current Roanoke County Swlmmina Pooi Ordinance regulations be maintained In the form of recommendations for the remainder of the 1995.96 season. This would mean that the Neaith Department would have authoriy to negotiate recommendations at each pool site and each pool would potentlal[y have its own unique set of regulations/recommendations for the upcoming pool year. We wi[I utilize the inspection process this year to work out the unique needs and situations of each pool in order to develop regulations and/or guidelines which promote safety and health In the context of swimming In the Roanoke County community. We would still want to maintain the authority to receive applications and Issue pem~its, but 1t would be under a recommendation mode rather than a regulation mode. Please !et me know if you need further clarlflcatlon and I hope this is satisfactory to everyone. I am, Slncerefy yours, . ~i~~ Molly .Rutledge, M.D.~ Director Allegheny and Roanoke Clry Neaith Districts MLR/k~d CC: Mr. "Fuzzy" Mlnnlx Mr. Richard Tabb ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 23, 1995 ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTIONS 4- 4, DEFINITIONS, 4-10, OPERATIONS, 4-11 SECURITY, 4-12 SAFETY AND RESCUE EQUIPMENT; OTHER SAFETY FEATURES, AND 4-13, ENTRY AND INSPECTIONS, ENFORCEMENT, PENALTIES OF ARTICLE I IN GENERAL, OF CHAPTER 4 AMUSEMENTS, OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO CONFORM THIS ORDINANCE WITH STATE POSTING REGULATIONS FOR WATER QUALITY AND TO PROVIDE AUTHORITY TO THE HEALTH DIRECTOR TO NEGOTIATE RECOMMENDATIONS AT EACH POOL SITE ON ISSUES RELATED TO PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY WITHOUT EXERCISE OF REGULATORY OR ENFORCEMENT POWERS WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia adopted Ordinance 62894-18 to add certain sections to the Roanoke County Code in order to clarify the legal authority of the Roanoke County Health Department to carry out courtesy inspections of public swimming pools to insure their operation is in accordance with Virginia Department of Health regulations governing such pools; and WHEREAS, since the adoption of this ordinance, the Virginia Department of Health has adopted regulations governing the posting of water quality test results which contain requirements which are less stringent that those contained in the county's ordinance, but other state regulations dealing with safety issues have been held in abeyance for the foreseeable future; and WHEREAS, experience gained during the administration of the county's ordinance over one operating season has produced suggestions for improvements of some provisions of this ordinance, and the Health Department wishes to proceed for the 1995-96 season with the authority to receive applications and issue permits and to I a' negotiate recommendations addressing health and safety concerns at each pool but to refrain from the exercise of any regulatory enforcement powers; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on May 9, 1995; a second reading was held on May 23, 1995. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Article I. In General of Chapter 5, AMUSEMENTS of the Roanoke County Code be amended and reenacted to read and provide as follows: Sec 4-4. Definitions. For the purposes of this article, the following words and phrases shall have the meaning ascribed to them by this section, unless otherwise indicated to the contrary: Public swimming pool: Shall mean any swimming pool, other than a private residential swimming pool, intended to be used collectively by numbers of persons for swimming or bathing and operated by any person, whether as owner, lessee, operator or concessionaire, fox` 'wh.a.ch' ~n~ fee o~ c~nsz.~e~a~~~sn ;~~`;~h~~t~~c~; Ica such use reg-a-~~ess e~~re~~---~~~e~s ~~ge~€ei ~'~ The term "public swimming pool" includes, but is not limited to, tourist establishment pools, pools owned or operated by x?~ni ~Q~~~,>. condominium, private club ~~arr~~ra~e~-~ .......................... .......................... .......................... apartment, or any association of persons. The term "public swimming pool" shall not include single occupant tubs and showers 2 s-~ used exclusively for therapeutic purposes. Sec. 4-10. Operation. (a) Each swimming pool owner shall require an operator to be available except when the pool is out of service. (b) Lifeguard(s) shall be required and present at all times during operation based on the following criteria: (1) pools of 2, 000 square feet of t~`~' surface area or :::::.~::::.:: j'::: i. more and open for use - minimum of one (1) lifeguard; (',~) pools with a surface area of less than 2,000 square feet, ariclf~ having less than 75 swimmers present shall be required to provide a designated supervisor to oversee swimmer activity provided, however, that a sign is posted as follows: ~~Warninq; No Lifeguard on Duty. Children under the age of 14 should not be allowed to use the pool without an adult in attendance.~~ (',~) pools of ...less than 1, 000 square feet o water ;::: :surface area may be used without a designated lf`eguarcl if all of the following criteria are met: a. children under 14 years of age are not allowed to use the pool unless accompanied by an adult; b. no one shall be allowed to be in the pool alone; c. a sign be posted exactly as stated in (b)(3) above. 'S~ ..;<<Pools re ars3les~:::::;o:~:::::; theZ~:::>::::~~z~,.;::;;;ogcu. ,~.~d>::::>~~ ;.' ;; .: ~w~miners or more:.;~r3I1::>::<b~::>::;.:::r~::;:~.rid:.:::::o:;:::>:::::::a~?'~:;:<.:. ....................................................... designated li'fec~uard:,: 3 '~~ (c) Operators and lifeguards shall be required to possess a current certification meeting the current standard for a pool operator or lifeguard as recommended by the National Recreation and Park Association, the American Red Cross or other accredited agency (d) A bound log shall be maintained by the swimming pool operator on the premises which shall contain the time and dates of the chemical test performed, results of those tests and initials of the persons who performed the necessary testing. The log shall be retained for a period of twelve (12) months. 1. The log shall include the following at the specified intervals: a. all chemicals added, including quantity and time added - as needed; b. personnel and changes in personnel - as necessary; c. injuries - as necessary; d. maintenance operations including backwashing and vacuuming - as necessary; tant levels - ever tine t~~k' e. d i s in f ec Y ..::::»::;~.;:;. ;;.;;;:.;:.;;;;:.;;:::::~:::::::: ~.: t-~i~ee--(~} hours ; f . Ph balance - every t~rtertt~-fo'~~>'~~~`~' Free-ter 4 r- e hours; g. stabilizer - weekly; h. alkalinity and calcium hardness - weekly. (e) Swimmer load shall not exceed a density of one (1) person per twenty-seven (27) square feet of pool surface area. (f) Animals, fowl and/or pets shall not be permitted within the pool area. This section shall not apply to working dogs, such as seeing eye dogs. sec. 4-11. security. (a) Every public swimming pool shall be equipped with the following aids to safety and rescue which shall be readily accessible at all times: (4) A readily accessible room or area designated and equipped .:.;:<;. for emer enc care of casualties . I!:f < s~rs~o~ri >:e g Y readily ava~.lable ' in ~~.oee proxx,mzty to` th~.~oal~ ;the 5 . ..,J -. r,::.: a..;:;::.des:a nabe::€:>a.>::ar~sca~n;::#~.~,:h~.~;::::::~:~.>:::<4nexs.:::::~~:;"<ta gaol awrte ~:::.y>:.... >:....`~, : ......::.:::.>::>::>:<::::.:;::.;:.;.::;:.;:.;:.;::.;:;:,;;;;;;;::.>::.;>;:.;;;::.;:::::::::::::::::::::::::;:::..:........ ~~ntrQ~: ~c~i~_.th~~,,pux'p;ca~,~~ Minimum equipment shall e e f first aid kit previously required, ~f~t' ' -' ^"""~''' hee3~bea~~ and 2 blankets. (6) On all swimming pools, the depth of the water shall be marked plainly at or above the water surface on the vertical wall of the swimming pool and on the edge of the deck next to the swimming pool. Numbers and letters shall be a ..m1r~.mum:a~~', ~ inches in size and of a goo contrast with the pool wall and deck. Depth markers shall be placed at the following locations: a. at the points of maximum and minimum depths; b. at the point of change between deep and shallow portions (txans,~,~avn }'~~"'"; ""'~ point) ; c. at intermediate one foot increments ~r~; points as to denote the water depths in the diving area. Sec. 4-13. Entry and Inspections; Enforcement; Penalties. (a) In accordance with the provisions of § 32.1-25 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, the Health Director or his designee shall have the right to enter any property to conduct 6 J ' ~' inspections and to ensure compliance with this ordinance. All public swimming pools in the county may commence operations each year only after being inspected by the Health Director or his designee and receiving a permit from the Director and after complying with all licensing requirements of the Commissioner of the Revenue. The Health Director is authorized to require each owner to complete and submit an annual application, all in such form as the Director shall approve. -a~e-1~ "' ' "}"' c==o11 h= (b) When the Health Director finds that any condition exists that endangers the life, health or safety of the users of any 7 S_~ L'' ~i3~~6 63~~rrrz-o rr:-azv-ra~~-crr~ ~ } L• „ ^ ~ "~ m.-c~z-r6~2^s-4~":- cirrv~~~i-~ ' ~' i.• ~ ~ ~.• ~~`-6z-a '~`~•~~--i-zicrs~S~k@3i~6i~ ~~-S ~E~Et2t~6~-~cr~~3~6-~6~2~~-6~~6-i -scc i` •• ~ ; }-h } .• • • .• ~ ; a y. °pa-~ u v u T2'~'e'~r ~-e'~~ ~ ~ L, l l ~e'~StiTC~'C~" J- Ir ,.:. .::.> ::.. ..:.....:... ;.;:.;::: ;:.;:; ::; .> .;::::>::>:: ; „h>::>::vr:<:::>~a.~~i~...:::::..v....~.::: ~h.~..: used ...::::::::::::.:::::.::::~.:::.~.::.:::.:::::::::::::::: ~~» .~p.:::.~~~.::::L~,.~~..:::h~a~,~ .::.:.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.~.::::.:.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::.::::::::::.::.::::::::::::::::::.:::::::::.:::::::::::................... 2. This ordinance shall be effective from the date of its passage. '_/ ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER """ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 23, 1995 SUBJECT: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1. BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS The five year term of L. T. "Leon" McGhee, Vinton District, will expire 06/30/95. Supervisor Nickens has contacted Mr. McGhee and he wishes to serve another five year term. Supervisor Nickens has requested that confirmation of his reappointment be added to the Consent Agenda. 2. CLEAN VALLEY COUNCIL The two year term of Vince Reynolds will expire 06/30/95. At the May 9, 1995 meeting, Supervisor Nickens was requested to contact Mr. Reynolds concerning reappointment. 3. FIFTH PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION The three year terms of Edward G. Kohinke, Sr., Elected Representative, and Mrs. Pat Dean, Citizen Representative and Executive Committee Member, will expire 06/30/95. At the May 9, 1995 meeting, Supervisor Kohinke advised that he did not wish to be reappointed. Supervisor Nickens has advised that he contacted Mrs . Pat Dean and she would like to be reappointed to the Commission but not to the Executive Committee. Supervisor Nickens has requested that confirmation of her reappointment be added to the Consent Agenda. Supervisor Eddy advised that he will contact Lee Osborne. r ,~ 4. HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION SAFETY COMMISSION ~i-~ The four year terms of Lt. Art LaPrade, Police; Jeffrey A. Echols, Transportation Representative; Ms. Jackie Talevi, Legal Representative; and H. Rodney Smith, Senior Citizen Representative, will expire 06/30/95. Lt. LaPrade, Ms. Jackie Talevi, and H. Rodney Smith have served two consecutive terms and are not eligible for reap- pointment. 5. PARRS & RECREATION ADVISORY COMMISSION The three year term of Bobby G. Semones, Vinton District, will expire 06/30/95. 6. ROANORE VALLEY REGIONAL CABLE TV COMMITTEE The three year term of James B. Dickey, Member at Large, will expire 06/11/95. At the May 9, 1995 meeting, Supervisor Nickens was requested to contact Mr. Dickey concerning reappointment. 7. VIRGINIA WESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE BOARD The four year term of Jean Glontz will expire 06/30/95. Ms. Glontz has served two consecutive terms and is not eligible for reappointment. SUBMITTED BY: ~- Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: C~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) Kohinke To ( ) _ Minnix Nickens L/-~ ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 23, 1995 RESOLUTION 52395-10 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM L - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for May 23, 1995, designated as Item L - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 6, inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of Minutes for April 25, 1995. 2. a. Confirmation of committee appointments to the Board of Zoning Appeals, Clean Valley Council, Fifth Planning District Commission, Highway and Transportation Safety Commission, Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission, and ~g~~~+~es~e~-~emm~~-ice 1. ~..., , _ J,. o,.__ a . b. Confirmation of committee appointment to the Virginia Western Community College Board. 3. Resolution of Congratulations to Total Action Against Poverty upon their 30th Anniversary. 4. Acceptance of sanitary sewer facilities serving the Orchards - Botetourt South, Section 3. 5. Donation of drainage easements on Lots 6 through 10, Block 1, Section 1, The Gardens of Cotton Hill. 6. Authorization to move forward with "No Charge" Motorola Engineering Study to upgrade 800MHZ radio system. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. i~ On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Consent Resolution with the removal of Item 2, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None On motion of Supervisor Johnson to approve Item 2 with confirmation for Virginia Western Community College Board removed for separate vote, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None On motion of Supervisor Johnson to approve the appointment of Geoffrey Ottaway to the Virginia Western Community College Board, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: Supervisor Eddy A COPY TESTE: .~'~- Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Vickie L. Huffman, Assistant County Attorney John Cease, Chief of Police T. C. Fuqua, Chief of Fire & Rescue Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance f ` •' A t- -~l April 25, 1995 263 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 April 25, 1995 The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the fourth Tuesday, and the second regularly scheduled meeting of the month of April, 1995. IN RE: WORK SESSION 1. Work Session with Virginia Department of Transportation on Road Improvements to Route 221. At 2:05 p.m., Chairman Minnix called the work session to order with Supervisor Kohinke absent. Mr. Pete Sansabaucrh. vn~m District Construction Engineer, briefed the Board on Corridors A, B, and C, that are being considered for making road improvements to Route 221. He pointed out the path of each corridor on the map and described the short-term Phase I and long-term Phase II of the project. He provided the Board members with written information for two lane and four lane alternatives for each corridor and several April 25, 1995 265 Coopers Cove Baptist Church. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited by all present. IN RE: REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS Mr. Mahoney added an item to the Executive Session 2.1-344 (A) (3) to consider the disposition of publicly held real estate. Supervisor Nickens announced that the rezoning request for 2393 Hammond Drive had been continued until May 23, 1995, at the request of the petitioner, the Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority. IN RE: NEA BUSINESS 1. Approval of Health Insurance Contract for School and County employees. (Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Financel Ms. Hyatt advised that the County requested bids to provide health insurance coverage for the County and School employees for 1995/96. The bids requested proposals for the basic comprehensive package currently offered and for alternative managed care programs. The County received responses from seven companies and a team of County and School employees reviewed these responses with the assistance of an outside consultant, Slabaugh, Morgan and Associates. Ms. Hyatt advised that the team and staff are recommending approval of the two-tier health insurance contract with tier one being the current Trigon plan which would be offered to employees at the same cost as the 1994/95 plan. The second tier would be an option for r April 25, 1995 267 the contract until an appropriate time in the evening portion of the meeting. The motion was defeated by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Nickens NAYS: Supervisors Kohinke, Eddy, Minnix Supervisor Eddy withdrew his motion to approve the contract. Supervisor Minnix moved to table approval of the contract until later in the evening portion of the meeting. This motion was withdrawn with no vote. Supervisor Eddy moved to postpone approval of the contract until the evening portion of the meeting in order to hold a work session with action to follow. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: Supervisor Kohinke 2. Request for reimbursement to General Services budctet for expenses incurred for the citizen bulk/brush self- haul program. (Bill Rand, Director, General Services) A-42595-1 Mr. Rand advised that as a result of the tremendous requests for collection of debris from the ice storms of 1994, the County initiated a program to allow County citizens to haul up to a pickup truck load of material to the transfer station free of charge. The program began in April, 1994, and has been expanded to allow disposal of any normal material resulting from a residential cleanup. He Apri125, 1995 269 April 29, 1995 surplus auction. She advised that the other County departments and the School Administration have been contacted and they have no interest in retaining this equipment. She advised that the estimated value of the equipment is $100. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the donation. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None 4. Approval of sale of surplus 1973 Ford tanker to Eagle Rock Volunteer Fire Department. (Elaine Carver, Director, Procurement) A-42595-3 Ms. Carver advised that Eagle Rock Volunteer Fire Department has asked to buy the County's surplus 1973 Ford L-8000 Tanker for $3,500 in order to utilize the chassis for repair of their wrecked tanker. She is recommending that the County approve the sale rather than place the tanker in the April 29th surplus property auction, because the tanker has a minimal salvage value and a neighboring locality has a specific need for it. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the sale of the surplus 1973 Ford Tanker to Eagle Rock Volunteer Fire Department for $3,500. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None April 25, 1995 271 4. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to build a construction storacle yard on the southeast corner of Route 220 and VA 674, Cave Spring Magisterial district, upon the petition of Jim Walter Homes Inc. Supervisor Johnson questioned whether a special use permit for a construction yard should be authorized in an area where rural village zoning exists. Supervisor Eddy asked that this be clarified before the second reading of the ordinance. 5. Ordinance to rezone approximately 68.4 acres from AG-3 to AR to construct single family detached dwelling located beyond the terminus of Toddsbury Drive to the east, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of Akfer Corporation. Supervisor Nickens was concerned that staff felt that this rezoning should be subject to the Blue Ridge Parkway protection process which was recently used for the Boone and Musselwhite rezonings. He stated that he feels this rezoning has no impact on the Blue Ridge Parkway and invited the other Board members to view the property. 6. Ordinance to rezone approximately 1.23 acres from C-2 to R-1 to allow continued use as a single family residence, located at 123 John Richardson Drive, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of April 25, 1995 273 Transportation of $1,020 for the sale of .06 acre for a right of way needed for the expansion of I-81 in Roanoke County. Supervisor Eddy moved to approve the first reading and set the second reading for May 9, 1995. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None 3. Ordinance authorizinct the lease of 10.40 acres of real estate to Furman V. Wiseman, Jr. (John Willey, Property Manager) Mr. Willey advised that this is the first reading of an ordinance to authorize the lease of a dwelling on property at the Spring Hollow Reservoir to Furman V. Wiseman for $425 per month for one year, beginning May 1, 1995. Supervisor Kohinke moved to approve the first reading and set the second reading for May 9, 1995. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None IN RE: CONSENT AGENDA R-42595-4, R-42595-4.a Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the Consent Resolution. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix April 25, 1995 275 RESOLIITION 42595-4.a PROVIDING NOTICE OF INTENT TO ABANDON SECONDARY ROIITE 1153 (ELMWOOD LANE) WHEREAS, It appears to this Board that Secondary Route 1153, known as Elmwood Lane, from the eastern line of the right-of-way of Norfolk Southern Railway approximately 70.6 feet westerly to a pin set in the northerly line of Virginia Secondary Route 1153 at the southwest corner of a parcel designated Roanoke County Tax Number 54.04-02-09.1 and the southeast corner of a parcel designated Roanoke County Tax Number 54.04-02-09, more particularly hereinafter described, serves no public necessity and is no longer necessary as a part of the Secondary System of State Highways and should be abandoned pursuant to Section 33.1-151 of the code of Virginia of 1950, as amended; and, WHEREAS, the section of Virginia Secondary Route 1153 sought to be abandoned is described as follows: BEGINNING at the northeast terminus of Virginia Secondary Route 1153 (Elmwood Lane) at a point on the western right-of-way of property of Norfolk Southern Railway and the southeast corner of a 0.225-acre lot known as Tax Number 54.04-02-09.1; running thence along the northern line of Virginia Secondary Route 1153 north 63° 08" 41" E. to the southeast terminus of Virginia Secondary Route 1153 on the westerly right-of-way of property of Norfolk Southern Railway; running thence along the westerly line of the Norfolk Southern Railway property north 23° 08" E. 1 5.86 feet to the point of BEGINNING. NOW, THEREFORE, BE RESOLVED, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia: 1. That this resolution shall constitute the intention of April 25, 1995 277 that the staff investigate. (2) He advised that the Tour DuPont will be on Roanoke County's Main Street (Brambleton Avenue) on May 1st. Supervisor Minnix: He advised that he continues to receive calls about the method of brush/bulk pickup and is writing a memorandum about the possibility of amending that policy. IN RE: REPORTS Supervisor Johnson moved to receive and file the following reports after discussion of Items 6, 7, and 8. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance. 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Statement of Revenues and Expenditures as of March 31, 1995. 5. Statement of Treasurer's Accountability per Investments and Portfolio Policy, as of March 31, 1995. 6. Status Report on Cleanup of Illegal Dumps. 7. Status Report on the Sanitary Sewer Evaluation/Rehabilitation (SSEJR) Program. 8. Quarterly Report of Claims Activity for Self-Insurance Program. 9. Reports from the Virginia Department of Transportation Acknowledging Acceptance of Roads into the Secondary System: Acceptances Effective January through March, April 25, 1995 279 9. Murry White, Vice-President Elect, the League of Older Americans 10. Anita Cronise, Case Manager, the League of Older Americans 11. John Williamson, 20 East Church Avenue, The Arts Council 12. Kimberly McNair, 2929 Emissary Drive, Bethany Hall 13. Fred P. Roessel, Jr., Blue Ridge Community Services 14. Dan Naff, 2728 Colonial Avenue, Big Brother/Big Sisters 15. Jean Glontz, Hawkbill Circle, Child Health Investment Partnership 16. Ellen L. Brown, Director of Human Resources, Total Action Against Poverty 17. Estelle Nichols, 1240 Third Street, Bradley Free Clinic 18. Shannon Brabham, 3201 Brandon Avenue, Suite 1, Child Abuse Prevention Council 19. Kelly Vest-Skelly, Virginia Western, P. O. Box 14045, Natural Science Center 20. Mark Emick, Virginia Western Community College, P. O. Box 14045, for scholarship assistance 21. Rupert Cutler, Explore Park 22. Katherine F. Houck, 303 Norfolk Avenue, Virginia Museum of Transportation, Inc. 23. Connie Burnett, Executive Director, Gia Koehler, Associate Director, and Bill Houck, Voluntary Finance Chair, Roanoke April 25, 1995 281 NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson IN RE: CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION R-42595-5 At 7:05 p.m., Supervisor Eddy moved to return to Open Session and adopt the Certification Resolution. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Supervisor Johnson RESOLUTION 42595-5 CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open April 25, 1995 283 - - ---~- meeting. He presented the resolution to Mrs. Moles with the congratulations and appreciation of the Board and citizens. IN RE: PIIBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance to rezone 3.06 Acres from I-1 Conditional and C-1 Conditional to C-1 to house administrative offices and church services, located at 5240 Hollins Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Reformation Herald Publishing Association. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) Mr. Harrington advised that the petitioner is requesting :vE that the front 1.85 acres of a 3.06 acre parcel be rezoned to C-1 w which is the same zoning designation as the rear 1.21 acres. The petitioner wishes to remove the proffers which restrict the use of the property from both parcels of land. The petitioner is in the process of constructing an office building which will include a 40 seat chapel and is requesting the C-1 zoning to allow the chapel in the new office building. Mr. Harrington advised that the Planning Commission recommended approval of the petition. Supervisor Johnson requested that the matter be referred to staff for an explanation as to why construction was started before the proper zoning was acquired, and whether the easement issue had been resolved. Mr. Burec, petitioner, was present and responded to questions from Supervisor Johnson. ge There were no citizens to speak on this item and it was the April 25, 1995 287 ~-e-d -- - z ,,.: , _ ,.. , , ,,. , , --- ~. : ~ f o e .-T19 ~ ho „h ~ o } Y ~ ~. ~...Y j a a ozire a ,,. ,.. uui. ~a.y ' / ~6~"~'~''~t@~6i~S- "'v r~-rvrttrs-~rrr~~ ~'sii ct T eE~- "~S 1~--- • „ a.... L ` rx r z ~ y-~'2~e•e-5d-rt~i ~e--~2-9-r e~ ~vzrs Qrtn-rfi ~""crr~siri-iro'rcr~'r~izr~--crrcrf ..{,_1~ The property will be developed in substantial conformity to the attached concept plan dated 3113 95 revised 4/4/95 indicating the relative layout and location of the building, the square footage of the footprint of the building the location and number of parking spaces and Type C screening and buffering where the property adjoins R1 zoning, with a combination of Option 1, 15 foot buffer yard and Option 2 landscaping small evergreen trees and one row of evergreen trees to be planted and maintained in the buffer yard and to replace the 6 foot screening fence but achieve an equivalent screening effect The property will be developed to have a residential appearance in that the roof of the buildinq will be shingled and have a pitch equal to or greater April 25, 1995 289 ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None 3. Ordinance to rezone approximately 1.95 acres from C 1 and C-2 Conditional to C-2 Conditional to construct a supermarket and drug store, Located at 4919 and 4929 Colonial Avenue, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Alliance Properties, Inc. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zonin,_,g) 0-42595-7 There was no discussion and no citizens requested to speak. Mr. Harrington advised that prior to the public hearing, an amended proffer of conditions statement was submitted by the petitioner to address several of the remaining concerns of the surrounding community. He explained that these proffers are the basis for Mr. Wetherington's statements earlier that all of the property owners' concerns have been resolved. These amended proffers address lighting and materials for the wall. Supervisor Minnix moved to adopt the ordinance with amended April 25, 1995 291 Number 77.17-5-22) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of C-1 and C-2, Conditional, Office District and General Commercial District, to the zoning classification of C-2, Conditional, General Commercial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Alliance Properties, Inc. 3. That the owners voluntarily proffered in writing the following amendments to the conditions approved by the Board of Supervisors in 1988, which the Board of Supervisors hereby amends as follows: k,. ~ ~ i., i r9 ~@--~~~-A~ _ , k1~ i ~ ~. ~... ~ ~. t.. r g r ii 9- ' iri-n s~rr ~t~ ~j_ The prop erty will be develop ed in substantial conformity to the attached March 28 1995 concept plan April 25, 1995 293 ~_ Other than trash collection for the property, there will be no collection or recycling bins other than for the collection of gaper. ~_ The Harris Teeter loading dock and dumpster/compactor areas will be screened or buffered by a wall, fence or appropriate plantin sc~. The Revco loading/unloading area will be located on the side of the Revco building facing the Harris Teeter building and an enclosure to screen the Revco dumpster will be located in the area between the Revco and Harris Teeter buildings. X81 The fixture mounting height of the exterior site lighting p oles will not exceed 22 feet from grade. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Tax Map No. 86.08-1-2 BEGINNING at a point on the northerly side of Colonial Avenue (formerly Bent Mountain Road) at the southeasterly corner of property now or formerly owned by Craighead (DB 620, page 473) and which said point constitutes Corner 8 on the plat hereinafter referred to; thence N. 2 deg. 15' E. 265.24 feet to Point 9; thence S. 69 deg. 56' E. 21.01 feet to Point 10 ; thence S . 8 5 deg . 04' E . 4 6.4 5 feet to Corner 11; thence N. 79 deg. 17' E. 84.02 feet to Corner 5; thence S. 2 deg. 15' W. 299.42 feet to Corner 6, an old iron pipe planted on the northerly side of Colonial Avenue; thence N. 78 deg. 35' 150.19 feet to Point 8, the Place of Beginning, and shown as "Beatty Remaining 0.936 Acre" on a plat of survey prepared by C. B. Malcolm, Jr. dated April 17, 1974, which is of record in Deed Book 999 at page 68 in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County. April 25, 1995 295 classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance with the amended proffers, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None 4. Ordinance to rezone 5.93 acres of land from EP to AG-3 located at 2393 Hammond Drive Vinton Ma isterial District. upon the petition of the Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority. (Terry Harrington. Director of Plannin & Zonin CONTINIIED FROM MARCH 28, 1995) Chairman Minnix announced that .this rezoning has been continued until the May 23, 1995 meeting at the request of the petitioners. IN RE: OTHER BIISINESS 1. Ordinance authorizin a S ecial Use Permit to construct a broadcast tower ato Read Mountain a roximatel .4 mile north of Summit Ridge Road. Hollins Magisterial District upon the petition of Virginia Towers, Inc. (CONTINUED UNTIL MAY 23, 1995) Chairman Minnix announced that this rezoning has been continued until the May 23, 1995 meeting. April 25, 1995 297 2. Babette Cribbs, 6045 Burnham Road 3. Chris Shroeder, 5335 Warbonnet Road IN RE: WORK SESSION ON HEALTH INSURANCE CONTRACT At the afternoon session, the Board decided to have a work session on the health insurance contract for County and School employees at the evening session. Ms. Hyatt and Ms. White were present and answered specific questions from the Board members concerning how the Point of Service plan works, what the savings will be, costs to the employees and County, and specific physician and hospital coverage questions. In response to the Board's concern about employees being properly informed of their choices, Ms. White advised that the POS plan will be explained in small employee group meetings by Trigon as many times as necessary. Dr. Jerry Hardy, Director of Budget and Data Management for the County Schools, spoke in favor of the contract and advised that the School Team has recommended approval to the School Board. Ms. Jo Ann Poff, teacher at Hidden Valley Junior High School, and a member of the team, spoke in favor of approving the contract with both plans. She felt that the employees would benefit from having a choice between the current plan and the POS plan. 1. Approval of Health Insurance Contract for School and County employees. (Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance) A-42595-8 r 284 April 25, 1995 consensus of the Board that this rezoning be continued until the May 23, 1995 meeting. Supervisor Johnson advised that he will give a written list of his concerns to the staff. Supervisor Nickens asked that the staff determine whether the building permit was issued properly and included plans for the church. 2. Ordinance to rezone 0.49 acre from C-1 Conditional to C-1 Conditional to construct a learning center, Located at 4903 Colonial Avenue, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Alliance Properties, Inc. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 0-42595-6 • Mr. Harrington advised that Alliance Properties, Inc. is requesting that the property be rezoned to allow Janus Learning Center to move from their present location at 4903 Colonial Avenue, which is the building next to the site that is the subject of the next rezoning request by Alliance Properties, Inc., to 4929 Colonial Avenue, which is the third building away from the site. The petitioner is also requesting that the previous proffers from 1982 be removed and is proffering three conditions. These conditions were agreed to by the petitioner, neighboring property owners, and the Planning Commission in an attempt to ensure that any development of the property will be in conformity with the residential character of the Colonial Avenue neighborhood. He described the proffers which include (1) concept plan which limits the size of the building, and location of the • s A-52395-10.a ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 23, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: a. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Board of Zoning Appeals, Clean Valley Council, Fifth Planning District Commission, Highway and Transportation Safety Commission, Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission and ~'_~..,.: „~ ~ °'~~*'~'~" . 7 ___-~ n.,,,,,,,,,,,-0 ~.. n.,i ~ .. a...,,,.a ~v.~w~......=_1 ..==.J~ _..-__ b. Confirmation of Committee Appointment to Virginia Western Community College Board COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The following nominations were made at the May 9, 1995 meeting. 1. Board of Zoninci Appeals Supervisor Nickens has contacted Mr. McGhee and he wishes to serve another five year term representing the Vinton District. His term will expire June 30, 2000. Supervisor Nickens has requested that confirmation of his appointment be added to the Consent Agenda. 2. Clean Valley Council Supervisor Eddy indicated his willingness to serve another two year term, which will expire 6/30/97. 3. Fifth Planning District Commission Supervisor Minnix nominated Alfred C. Anderson, Elected Representative, to serve another three year term. His term will expire June 30, 1998. 4. Hiahway and Transportation Safety Commission Supervisor Eddy nominated Horace L. McPherson, Citizen Representative, to serve another four year term. His term will expire June 30, 1999. L-~ 5. Parks & Recreation Advisory Committee Supervisor Johnson nominated Tim Hoelzle, Hollins District, to serve a three year term.. His term will expire June 30, 1998. Mr. Hoelzle was serving the unexpired portion of Rita Watson's term. Supervisor Minnix nominated Jack W. Griffith, Cave Spring District, to serve another three year term. His term will expire June 30, 1998. 6. Virginia Western Community College Board Supervisor Johnson nominated Geoffrey Ottaway to serve a four year term. His term will expire June 30, 1999. Mr. Ottaway was previously serving the unexpired portion of Patrick Shaffner's term. RECOMMENDATION• It is recommended that these appointments be confirmed by the Board of Supervisors. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, x'11 !~~- ~~'~ C~- Mary H. Allen Elmer C. Hodge Clerk County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: Bob L. Johnson to approve with Confirmation for VWCC Board removed for separate vote VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy x Johnson x Kohinke x Minnix x Nickens x ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson No Denied ( ) to approve confirmation of Eddy x Received ( ) appointment of Geoffrey Johnson Referred ( ) Ottaway to VWCC Board Kohinke To ( ) Minnix Nickens cc: File Board of Zoning Appeals File Clean Valley Council File Fifth Planning District Commission File Highway and Transportation Safety Commission File Parks & Recreation Advisory Committee Virginia Western Comunity College Board Yes Abs X x x x ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 23, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Board of Zoning Appeals, Clean Valley Council, Fifth Planning District Commission, Highway and Transportation Safety Commission, Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission and Virginia Western Community College Board COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The following nominations were made at the May 9, 1995 meeting. 1. Board of Zoning Appeals Supervisor Nickens has contacted Mr. McGhee and he wishes to serve another five year term representing the Vinton District. His term will expire June 30, 2000. Supervisor Nickens has requested that confirmation of his appointment be added to the Consent Agenda. 1. Clean Valley Council Supervisor Eddy indicated his willingness to serve another two year term, which will expire 6/30/97. 2. Fifth Planningt District Commission Supervisor Minnix nominated Alfred C. Anderson, Elected Representative, to serve another three year term. His term will expire June 30, 1998. Supervisor Nickens has advised that he contacted Mrs. Pat Dean and she would like to be reappointed to the Commission but not to the Executive Committee. Supervisor Nickens has requested that confirmation of her reappointment be added to the Consent Agenda. s 3. Highway and Transportation Safety Commission Supervisor Eddy nominated Horace L. McPherson, Senior Citizen Representative, to serve another four year term. His term will expire June 30, 1998. 4. Parks & Recreation Advisory Committee Supervisor Johnson nominated Tim Hoelzle, Hollins District, to serve a three year term. His term will expire June 30, 1998. Mr. Hoelzle was serving the unexpired portion of Rita Watson's term. Supervisor Minnix nominated Jack W. Griffith, Cave Spring District, to serve another three year term. His term will expire June 30, 1998. 5. Virginia Western Community College Board Supervisor Johnson nominated Geoffrey Ottaway to serve a four year term. His term will expire June 30, 1999. Mr. Ottaway was previously serving the unexpired portion of Patrick Shaffner's term. RECOMMENDATION• It is recommended that these appointments be confirmed by the Board of Supervisors. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, Mary H. Allen Elmer C. Hodge Clerk County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) Kohinke To ( ) Minnix Nickens AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 23, 1995 RESOLUTION 52395-10.b OF CONGRATULATIONS TO TOTAL ACTION AGAINST POVERTY FOR THEIR 30 YEARS OF SERVICE TO THE ROANORE VALLEY WHEREAS, in 1964, Congress passed the Economic Opportunity Act and authorized locally organized and controlled Community Action Agencies to operate local and federal poverty programs; and WHEREAS, on April 29, 1965, TOTAL ACTION AGAINST POVERTY (TAP) was chartered as the official poverty agency for Roanoke, Salem, Roanoke County, Botetourt and Bedford Counties; and WHEREAS, during its 30 year history, TAP has served as a role model throughout the United States as one of the most successful programs designed to help individuals and families get off the cycle of poverty and welfare and to become productive self- supporting citizens; and WHEREAS, since its inception, over 17,000 children have attended Headstart Programs; 4,120 youth and 2,950 adults have received their GED, 45,116 households have been served by the Virginia Water Project, 5,500 homes have been weatherized, and countless others have been served by programs such as the Transitional Living Center, the Southwest VA Second Harvest Food Bank, Project Discovery and VA Cares; and WHEREAS, Roanoke County is proud to have contributed both financially and through donations to this outstanding program during the past 30 years. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, offers its congratulations to Total ~-~3 Action Against Poverty upon the celebration of their 30th anniversary, and FURTHER, the Board wishes continued success to TAP in their efforts to assist the disadvantaged citizens of the Roanoke Valley in reaching a high quality of life. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: J°' Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Resolutions of Congratulations File ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~'~.,"~" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 23, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution of Congratulations to Total Action Against Poverty Upon their 30th Anniversary COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Total Action Against Poverty (TAP) is celebrating their 30th anniversary during 1995. Chartered on April 29, 1965, TAP has provided many programs designed to help individuals and families get off the cycle of poverty and to become productive citizens. TAP is considered one of the most successful community action agencies in the United States. Roanoke County has been a strong supporter of TAP offering financial support and donations such as Pinkard Court and the use of the Public Service Center as a food bank. Their Board of Directors has scheduled a 30th Anniversary Banquet to celebrate this occasion on Friday, May 26, 1995 at the Hotel Roanoke. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended the attached resolution be adopted by the Board of Supervisors and presented to TAP either prior to or at the 30th Anniversary Banquet. Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens L 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 23, 1995 RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS TO TOTAL ACTION AGAINST POVERTY FOR THEIR 30 YEARS OF SERVICE TO THE ROANORE VALLEY WHEREAS, in 1964, Congress passed the Economic Opportunity Act and authorized locally organized and controlled Community Action Agencies to operate local and federal poverty programs; and WHEREAS, on April 29, 1965, TOTAL ACTION AGAINST POVERTY (TAP) was chartered as the official poverty agency for Roanoke, Salem, Roanoke County, Botetourt and Bedford Counties; and WHEREAS, during its 30 year history, TAP has served as a role model throughout the United States as one of the most successful programs designed to help individuals and families get off the cycle of poverty and welfare and to become productive self- supporting citizens; and WHEREAS, since its inception, over 17,000 children have attended Headstart Programs; 4,120 youth and 2,950 adults have received their GED, 45,116 households have been served by the Virginia Water Project, 5,500 homes have been weatherized, and countless others have been served by programs such as the Transitional Living Center, the Southwest VA Second Harvest Food Bank, Project Discovery and VA Cares; and WHEREAS, Roanoke County is proud to have contributed both financially and through donations to this outstanding program during the past 30 years. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, offers its congratulations to Total Action Against Poverty upon the celebration of their 30th L- anniversary, and FURTHER, the Board wishes continued success to TAP in their efforts to assist the disadvantaged citizens of the Roanoke Valley in reaching a high quality of life. A-52395-10.c ACTION # ITEM NUMBER `° AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 23, 1995 SUBJECT: Acceptance of the Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving The Orchards - Botetourt South, Section 3 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Developers of Botetourt South, Section 3, F & W Community Development Corporation, have requested that Roanoke County accept the Deed conveying the sanitary sewer facilities serving the subdivision along with all necessary easements. The sewer facilities are installed, as shown on plans prepared by Lumsden Associates entitled Botetourt South, Section 3, dated February 15, 1995, which are on file in the County Engineering Department. The sanitary sewer facility construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County. FISCAL IMPACT: The value of the sanitary sewer construction is $17,800. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the sanitary sewer facilities serving the Botetourt South, Section 3 subdivision along with all necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities. L- ~' SUBMITTED BY: Gary R bertson, P.E. Utilit Director APPROVED: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Motion by Bob L. No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Johnson to approve Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred ( ) Kohinke x To ( ) Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections L-~ DEED OF EASEMENT AND ASSIGNMENT THIS DEED, DEED OF EASEMENT AND ASSIGNMENT, made this 21st day of April, 1995, by and between: F & W Community Development Corp. hereinafter referred to as the "Developer," party of the first part; the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, hereinafter referred to as the "Board," party of the second part; and ELMER C. HODGE, County Administrator of Roanoke County, VIRGINIA, party of the third part. W I T N E S S E T H THAT FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual benefits to accrue, the Developer does hereby GRANT, CONVEY, ASSIGN AND TRANSFER, with the covenants of GENERAL WARRANTY OF TITLE, in fee simple unto the Board all water and/or sewer lines, valves, fittings, laterals, connections, storage facilities, sources of water supply, pumps, manholes and any and all other equipment and appurtenances thereunto, in and to the water and/or sewer systems in the streets, avenues and public utility, water and/or sewer easement areas that have been or may hereafter be installed by the Developer, along with the right to perpetually use and occupy the easements in which the same may be located, all of which is more particularly shown and described and designated as follows, to wit: As shown on the plan entitled Botetourt South Sec. 3 made by Lumsden Associates and on file in the Roanoke County Engineering Department. Page 1 of 3 • ~~ 9 z- y The Developer does hereby covenant and warrant that it will be responsible for the proper installation and construction of the said water and/or sewer systems including repair of surface areas affected by settlement of utility trenches for a period of one (1) year after date of acceptance by the Board and will perform any necessary repairs at its cost. Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia, party of the third part, hereby joins in the execution of this instrument to signify the acceptance of this conveyance pursuant to Resolution No. adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. WITNESS THE FOLLOWING signatures and seals: Developer: F & W Community Develo ment Corp. By : ~/ ~ tee. As . ~~ ~.' ~: an~~ State o f : V: 2~.`.~.`~ County/C--~-t-y of : ~.-Jk~- to wit The foregoing deed was acknowledged before me this: Z8~- day of ~ 1 19 gS , By : ,~,Yo~...~ G, k~~ ~.,~~_ as Ike- P~,.U ; Duly autizo-rized officer Title on beha 1 f o f ~' !~ r~,,.w,~.:.-~~~ ~~v-~-~ ~o~ - 1`lotarv Pub My Commission expires : ~~~3~~ q6 Page 2 of 3 -y Approved as to form: County Attorney State of By County Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia Elmer C. Hodge County/City of: to wit: The foregoing deed was acknowledged before me this: day of 19 , by Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator, on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. Notary Public My Commission expires: Revised 02/10/95 Page 3 of 3 i ~ ,y:;„ _~. k~~, •. Q~ .i a = +~s 1 .+. fr Wr ~N fMMe+f M M~~.~ NOTES: 1) SANITARY SEWER LINES FROM MANHOLE M TO L TO K AND J SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO ROANOKE COUNTY SPECIFICATIONS. ALL MANHOLES IN ROANOKE COUNTY SNALI~ HAVE MH-RCR-3000EC COVERS. ALL OTHER SANITARY ' SEWER LINES SHOWN IIEREON SItALL BE CONSTRUCTED BY BOTETOURT COUNTY SPECIFICATIONS. 21 THE VERTICAL LOCATIUN OF THE EXISTING NATERLINE AT NOitTli ROME DRIVE IiAS NOT BEEN FIELD VERIFIED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY T}iE VERTICAL LOCATION OF Tf{E WATERLINE PRIOR TO TfiE O\SET OF :ONSTRUCTION. ROANOKE COUNTY UTILITY DEPARTMENT ACCEPTANCE OF SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES SERVING BOTETOURT SOUTH, SECTION 3. A-52395-10.d ACTION NO. ITEM NO. `! ~+ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 23, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Donation of drainage easements on Lots 6 through 10, Block 1, Section 1, The Gardens of Cotton Hill, to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ~~~~*L++~e.~ ~'^y"7 SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This consent agenda item involves acceptance of the following easements conveyed to the Board of Supervisors for drainage purposes, in connection with the development of The Gardens of Cotton Hill, upon and across Lots 6 through 10, Block 1, Section 1, in the Cave Spring Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke: a) Donation of a drainage easement, of variable width, from Strauss Construction Corporation, a Virginia corporation, (Deed Book 1445, page 1985; Plat Book 16, page 157) as shown on a plat prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C., Engineers-Surveyors-Planners, dated March 14, 1995, a copy of which is attached hereto. b) Donation of a drainage easement, of variable width, from Cheryl H. Goodwin, Heath M. Goodwin and Richard Goodwin, (Deed Book 1467, page 1457; Plat Book 16, page 157) as shown on a plat prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C., Engineers-Surveyors-Planners, dated February 14, 1995, a copy of which is attached hereto. The location and dimensions of this property have been reviewed and approved by the County's engineering staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of this easement. L.• ":J Respectfully submitted, ~' s Vick e L. Hu a Assistant Cou ty Attorney ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Motion by Bob L. No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Johnson to aporove Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred ( ) Kohinke x To ( ) Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Vickie L. Huffman, Assistant County Attorney Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections y ,~ti w O p~ n ~~ V h ~~ QG ~`~~~~? Q m' / ~ ~ ~ U ~• ~' r h s psi . r~,~b ryd ~, . '3, '''mss ~~, sa, ~J'G op J'sy J ~ s, ,'~~,,, '' \ 1s, . 6.s v J Q. Z v .I / ~-_. ~ I~ \~ I _\ ~~~~o \ -~s I \ ag~~ \ I I ~ ~Z _ I~ ~~~ ~~ _I 2 ~ I I ~ ~a o .a I ~ ~. 7 ~ ~ I I m ~' ~ 2 ~ '' I ~ ;~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ Z a ~ _ v I \ ` ~ ~ I N ti ~ V ~ ~ a I I ~ ~ ~ Q o °~ s ~ I I ~ ti ~ r ~ ~ w I gg.86 r.~ I I ~c o~ / ~ / 14,30" c ~ / ~~; Z 8 t~ y. ,lL'9l w - ~ ~M,.6/,~E,~ ~ ~ s ~ I ~- a w a 0 V rn rn H x U Z ~ o z U ~ ~ ~, ° a .~ a w f- a z ~ H E H h w U C f1 ,~ W S< z O Y W x .--. H z d- I- ? a. (A n [] H ~ Q cnQ w ~ o ~ w w ~ o~ a a ¢ voz cn U O cn O .-i H r.~ H ° p y- > w Q ~° o~ a ~ you; z H x z ~ oH ~ o ~a F ~ a~° w z ~ -~ t- o a a a w _.. _._ ~. . H . o z 2 H ~ ~ O ~ C~ ~ I--' C7 ~ C7 ~ ~ w ~ ~ z a z ~ m~ ~ o a Nz 2 ~ W ~ W U . O~ ~ w 3 w U w a ~ a H o ~ z ~ H ~ a ~ `~ cn ~ ~ x ~ F U cn O a *~~GiNIA ~a~4 ~ 0 ~ Zp m ~ U ~ ~ ~ Z ~ ~.~ ~ ~ J 3,~ 'C \ \ ~~Zv.,., \ v "1 K 0 v SS O m ~~ E 0 U GGRVE 'A" ~ ~``~~ 6 TAx+-96.07.7-7 \~~,~ ~~ d ?0'76'55" o for 7 ~~, \ R 304,~p' o Fq ~~'FE 7 54.96 i n. ~ SEMI NS'ogC cn _ ~T F A !08.75 ' f .o _ ~ GN. IOB.l7' ~- ~ ~ ~ B GN.9- 428°¢0'OB"E ° ,°~~ ~ NOTE: ~ 1) THIS PROPERTY IS NOT LOCATED WITHIN ~n 5EE NOrE #4 THE LIMITS OF A 100 YEAR FLOOD BOUNDARY ~ ~ /~ 37'1?'36'~W -"' ~ AS DESIGNATED BY FEMA. THIS OPINION IS /~ - - -~ ?- - -~ - o - .~ BASED ON AN INSPECTION OF THE FLOOD ~ \ % B. 5 0 INSURANCE RATE MAP AND HAS NOT BEEN ~ "`-- ~'--~ .~- EX. l5" h.7J. oo- z v, VERIFIED BY ACTUAL FIELD ELEVATIONS. ~ ~~ 57, 2 FLOOD ZONE "X". _ _ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ 2 2) THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED WITHOUT 'THE ~ •` 5 ?`l° 3?'43"E ~. ~ BENEFIT OF A CURRENT TITLE REPORT AND ~5 ORAINA~E EASEMEN7~ ? ~ THERE MAY EXIST ENCUMBRANCES WHICH o AFFECT THE PROPERTY NOT SHOWN HEREON./ _ - - - ~ ~~ ~ 3) THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED IN W~DOEGX GONG. ~ ~ ACCORDANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS SET / / 8~5T6F5 PAn ~ ` FORTH BY THE COMMONWEALTH OF ~9 .~:', VIRGINIA FOR PHYSICAL IMPROVEMENT / - B' 2.0' !?.0' ~0.5~ F SURVEYS. ~ yq.3' 4'3 21.0' FLUE _ ~ 4) DRAINAGE EASEMENT TO BE DEDI- / /w'/ q.,p' 2.p CATED TO THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE J ~` '~ ~i FOR PUBLIC USE. / ~~ N 2 h]ORY 9RIC11 9/ ~ ?p m 2 ~c~ I FRAME QWEGGlNG o 2?.0 ^`5833 M ~ r- - - J ~ ~~ ~^ 30.8' ~ _~ 1_ ~~ I /~I I -- 1pON ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ \ tio3e SrRAU45 GON4]RUG7~ON GORPORAIION ~9,,~ Sri ~'~'~L 9ET \ \ ~ \ A!6 ~°9 EtiJ F'yo ~ of \ \ 9 IRON PIN 5E 7 6 ~°~ C~Tio \ ~ ~ \ ig ~l'y ' ~ P1N ~- SO~~p, 5ET ~ I ~ - -~- - - ° - - --t-r ~ TD ~'/, l ~ ~ 3RICK 5700P e/ M ~'yFT7,Q~ STEP w(W5Cn8NG. ~ „A „ t~ IRON PIN 5E7 ~yAGA~~ G~accE 5o'R~~ PLAT SHOWING PROPERTY OF CHERYL H. GOODWIN, HEATH M, GOODWIN RICHARD E, GOODWIN BEING LOT 7, BLOCK 1,' SECTION 1 T1iL: GAP.L`ENS OF COTTON I:ILL ~ (P.B. 16, PAGE 157) ~pLTN ss,,,, ~`t~ ~'L~yr CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ~O _ : Car ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA L N~ T K ~~Z SCALE: 1 ~~ = 3 0 ' DATE: 14 FEBRUARY , 19 9 5 ,i ~ ~~ ~' "' ~ . ~/iJ/%5 nIU• Ot 14288 0 , LUMSDEN ASSOCIATES, P. C. t,, S ~D ~~o4' ENGINR NNERS E ^/ SURV OANOKE V RGIN~A COMM." QFj _ 46 L-S a A-52395-10.e ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER L- C~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 23, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Approval for moving forward with "no charge" Motorola Engineering Study to upgrade 800MHZ radio system. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: On May 17, 1995 a presentation was made to the Board of Supervisors regarding the need to upgrade the 800MHZ Motorola radio system summary attached). As a result of that meeting the staff was requested to place an item on the agenda, for Board action, addressing the need to move forward with this Engineering study. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Roanoke County is facing a number of communications issues that have an impact on the County's ability to carry on its day to day operations, particularly in the area of public safety. The present 800MHZ two-way communications system, which provides fine radio coverage and dependability, needs to be expanded in a timely manner in order to ensure continued dependable communications for all departments. The Board of Supervisors, having heard the details of this issue, at their May 17th CIP Worksession, indicated their support for moving ahead with an Engineering study, providing this Engineering study was at "no cost to the County". This Engineering study would more precisely define the problems, solution, costs and time frame for upgrading the 800MHZ radio system. Motorola, being Roanoke County's supplier of the 800MHZ radio system, has agreed to undertake this Engineering study at "no cost to Roanoke County". °` FISCAL IMPACT: There will be no 95/96 fiscal impact on the County, as Motorola has agreed to perform this Engineering study at their expense. There was agreement among the four Board members present to fund the implementation stage of the communications upgrade by using the approximate $356,000.00 current annual 800 MHZ debt drop off and/or an increase in the 911 surcharge tax or a combination thereof. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff Motorola Engineering study of results back to the Board for recommends moving forward with the the 800MHZ system and bringing the more detailed discussion. Respectfully submitted, n Cease ief of Police Approved by, ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Tom y F ua Ch' f of F' e & Rescue ---------------------------------------- ACTION Approved (x) Motion by: Motion by Bob L Denied ( ) Johnson to approve Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) cc: File John Cease, Chief of Police Tommy Fuqua, Chief of Fire & Rescue Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance --- -------------- VOTE ------- No Yes Abs Eddy x Johnson x Kohinke x Minnix x Nickens x L - ~v 800 MHz Radio System Communications Gost Prior ' Estimated Expenditures 6yFiscal. Year Total t P o Qistributican Funding 35-96 ' 96-97 g7-98 '98-9g ' 99-00 jec r Cost Total Cost 2,000 0 2,084,000 0 0 0 $2,086,000 Other Funding 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0 Net County Cost 2,000 0 2,084,000 0 0 0 $2,086,000 Roanoke County is facing a number of communications issues that have an impact on the County's ability to carry on its day to day operations, particularly in the area of public safety. The present 800 MHz two-way communications system, which provides fine radio coverage and dependability, needs to be expanded in a timely manner in order to ensure continued dependable communications for all departments. Current issues are as follows: The 800 MHz system has exceeded its maximum capacity • FCC loading limits have been exceeded on the current seven-channel system -the system was designed for 700 users, but currently has 725 and continues to grow • Access to the system may be adversely impacted due to this congestion • The County's ability to handle a major disaster may be compromised due to the system's being unable to efficiently process the "air time" demand • Loss of a channel due to mechanical failure, lightning strike, etc., exacerbates the problem • The County is denied the advantages of using a single 800 MHz system due to lacking the "throughput" required for acceptable operation in both the public and private safety sectors Frequency scarcity for system expansion • Frequencies are allocated by the FCC on a "first-come, first-serve" basis • 806 MHz (currently used) is the most cost-effective option • Other groups in the County's area are interested in 806 MHZ frequencies; consequently, these frequencies may not be available at a later date Low Band System Problems • Low band equipment is approaching obsolescence • Need by low band users for portable radio coverage provided by 800 MHz systems • Need by low band users for unit to unit coverage, not just unit to base coverage L - l~ Need for increased operability between all departments within the County Eliminating low band radios simplifies maintenance, parts inventory and training Aging of some 800 MHz equipment • 6 of the 21 repeaters have been in continuous use for almost 8 years; failures are occurring which cause the system to lose a channel and reduce "throughput" • 209 portables have been in service for almost 8 years; as these items age, failure rates and repair expenses will increase Analog microwave system nearing saturation point • 68 of 96 channels are currently in use • Adding three 800 MHz channels will require an additional 27 microwave channels • Eventual replacement with digital microwave would resolve the problem CAPITAL COSTS Several options have been proposed to deal with the above-mentioned problems. Among the options, an agent for Motorolla has presented his following Recommended Action Plan: • Apply immediately to the FCC for seven additional channels; add three channels to the 800 MHz system and replace the oldest repeaters; move 48 low band users to the 800 MHz system by relocating existing mobiles and portables from Public Safety and replace with new units -- $726,000 • Upgrade to digital microwave - $500,000 • Add four channels to the 800 MHz system -- $620,000 • Move the remaining 108 low band users to the 800 MHz system - $238,000 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S RECOMMENDATION: We have begun this project by applying to the FCC for additional channels. It is important that we proceed in the near future to begin migrating to a digital system. Staff user groups have been requested to formulate a financing plan using E-911 fees, lease/purchase options, etc., to fund this project over the next several years. a-/ County of Roanoke, Virginia General Fund Unappropriated Balance Amount % of General Fund Expenditures Beginning Balance at July 1, 1994 (Audited) $7,123,594 8.3% November 22, 1994 Community Visioning Process (40,000) November 22, 1994 Traffic control at Hanover Direct (10,000) January 10, 1995 Public Safety Building improvements (92,000) February 28, 1995 Citizen Survey (12,600) April 11, 1995 Dixie Caverns Cleanup (2,250,000) April 11, 1995 Tour DuPont (5,000) Apri125, 1995 Citizen Bulk/Brush Self-Haul Program (98,608) Balance at May 23, 1995 $4,615,386 5.4% Submitted By Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance Note: On December 18, 1990, the Board of Supervisors adopted a goal statement to maintain the General Fund Unappropriated Balance at 6.25% of General Fund revenues ($85,310,775). m:finance\common\board\genera1.95 May 16, 1995 ~' ~- County of Roanoke, Virginia Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance Beginning Balance at July 1, 1994 (Audited) Sale of Ogden Property (net of marketing costs) Sale of Fire Truck to Eagle Rock Volunteer Fire Department Balance at May 23, 1995 Submitted by $ 29,835.86 395,450.81 3,500.00 $ 428,786.67 ~~.~ ~. Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance • The Board has pending closure at this time Sale of School Administration Building ($600,000 over three years). m:\finance\common\boazd\capita1.95 May 16, 1995 ~' -~ County of Roanoke, Virginia Reserve for Board Contingency Original 1994-1995 Budget June 28, 1994 Dixie Caverns Landfill August 23, 1994 Additional funds for Bushdale Road September 13, 1994 Contribution to Friends of the Blue Ridge Parkway October 11, 1994 Williamson Road design master plan January 10, 1995 Regionalization Study February 28, 1995 County Code Supplement Balance as of May 23, 1995 Submitted by ~,La~ ~ . ~J ~~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance • $90,000 (50,000) (10,000) (1,000) (20,000) (3,000) (4.2271 $1,773 m:\finance\common\boazd\conti nge.95 ACTION # • i• i• ITEM NUMBER ~ `'~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 23, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Accounts Paid -April 1995 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Payments to Vendors: Payroll: 4/7/95 $566,356.20 4/21/95 560,201.45 $3,789,836.20 1,126,557.65 $4,916,393.85 A detailed listing of the payments is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: ~~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance ACTION Approved () Motion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To () ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy _ _ Johnson _ Kohinke _ _ _ Minnix Nickens ACTION N0. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUN'T'Y ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 23, 1995 AGENDA ITEMS: Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investments and Portfolio Policy, as of April 30, 1995. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S QONIl~TI'S SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: BAKERS ACCEPTANCE: WHEAT 1ST FERGUSON-ANDREWS SMITH-BARNEY-SHEARSON CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSITS: SOUIIIWEST VIRGINIA SAVINGS & LOAN COMMERICAL PAPER: CRESTAR NATIONS PAINS-WEBBER SIGNET LOCAL GOVT INVESTMENT POOL: GIIVERAL FUND RESOURCE AUTHORITY REPURCHASE AGREFIK~IT : CENTRAL FIDELITY FIRST VIRGINIA TOTAL STAFF RECONAg'~iDATION : Respectf ly Submi ed by - - red C. Anderson County Treasurer 1,990,462.22 988,469.44 995,702.78 3,974,634.44 100,000.00 100,000.00 1,988,255.56 1,990,356.67 993,833.33 995,066.67 5,967,512.23 4,503,752.26 1,503,843.90 6,007,596.16 1,004,635.56 10,156,000.00 11,160,635.56 --------------- 27,210,378.39 Approve: -- -;-~~ --------------------- Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson _ _ _ Referred ( ) Kohnike To ( ) Minnix _- - _- Nickens ACTION N0. ITEM NUMBER ~" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 23, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Bond Project Status Report COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Attached is narrative overview of the bond projects approved in the 1992 Bond Referendum (Attachment A), a time line for the projected/actual activity of the various work components (Attachment B) and a listing of projects that have been completed (Attachment C) . FISCAL IMPACT: None. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Questions may be directed to either the specific project coordinator listed on the time line worksheet or John Chambliss. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, ohn M. Chambliss, Jr. Elmer C. Hodge Assistant County Administrator County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) Kohinke To ( ) Minnix Nickens D-!v BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment A May 23, 1995 1992 BOND REFERENDUM PROJECTS PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS DRAINAGE PROJECTS -MASON CREEK This project has been indefinitely delayed until access can be obtained. DRAINAGE PROJECTS -WOLFS CREEK VDOT participation is anticipated. PARKS AND RECREATION Garst Mill Park -The playground is complete and is being heavily used. Starke,~ark -The parking lot is complete. Merriman Soccer Complex -The contractor is finished. Staff has seeded the entire complex. Whisperin Pines Park -The project is complete. Goode Park -The sewer and water lines are complete. Vinyard Park -The contractor is on-site installing drains. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MASTER PLAN Dewberry and Davis is preparing the master plan. Aerial photography has been completed. D-lam ~ O O M O ~ O M ~00~ p O ~ .--a ~ O ~ ~~ t~,~n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ z.~Q o ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ 'd U s-+ O ~ ~ U ~ ~ Gi 'o ~. a W U ~ ~ a\ a ~~ A~N O~~ ald~ O W O U W A d z~ a U ~C A a O ., z ., a d w w z d ti w A ~ o z ~ F O w c~ d w C7 A A m w •~ w a w a w •~ w a w .a w a z d z d z d z d z d z d z d d .a E" U d a F" U d .a E' U d .a E" U d .a E"' U d .a F" U d .a E" U a d w d a d a d w d a d a d ~z o H ~ ~ H° H H ~ d H ~W H~ x ~ ~ H z w Fa H w~ a ¢ 0 0 ~n A A d 3 0 O `" ~ O " a~ O aUA d W dU U v~U aU H .., A b c~ baA ~." .~ a O U ~. ~° b .~ ~: .o 0 0 .., .'., a• .~ 0 ~n w 0 a~ U O ~, !~. '~ ~ c~ cd ~" a~ b ~ ~ H U ~ O O O O O O y~0~0 O ^~ ~ 6 4 .s-i" N N ~ U .~ ~ ~ A z~~ ~~ ~~ o a~ U ~ ~+ W U O a H A H U ~~~ a ~~ z~N ~ ~ a1 ~ ~ W U z 0 U O a a A .~ ., z ., ~ ~ °~ a d a Q W w Q ., W A ~ o z H U O W w ca Q E. d F. Q F. a Q a ~ a`~. Q z 0 ~ ~3F W w~ H z ~ H ~ U ~ O N bA '~ .~ M ~ ~ o .~ x~ ~~ ~, ~ .° o ~ U ~ ~ N ~ U -~ O 'd ~--~ cG c~ .-. ,b ,-~ o~ ~ .., ... ~~ ~~ >~ o~ > ,~ •., ~, .3 .~ a ~~ ,~ H a ~? ~ a~ o ,~ U cd ~~ 3 ~ ~ 'o ,~ u, 3 a~ ~~ o ~ ~" '~ ~ '~ a~ O v~ ~' z~ W U a a~ N U~ ~N ~ O O O O O O ~ p O N ~ b~3 ~ N .r' ~ ~-+ ~ ~ ~ byA A `~z~° i~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ,~ U U O ~ ~" O W U U N O a W H A H U ~~~ rn a ~~ z~N ~~ Q~ a ti z ~, '^ d °' a d a Q x ~ w w U a O ~' U ~ W C!~ A F 0 O z a a ~, ~ o q °~ w A ~ ~ d w Q W a Q a w a w a w a Q a z d z d z d z d z d z d F H F H H F Q ~ Q Q Q Q ,~ a U d ,a a U d ,.a a U d ,~ a U d ,~ a U d ,a a U d F o z 0 x ~ z H ~ d H ~" ~ ~ a w wN ~'z" ~z z H W A 0~ Q O O O ~ ~ U a 'd c~ a .~ .~ .~ ,o .~ .~ c~ H O A a~ a~ 0 U c~ a z 0 U M Q '". COQ aj ~~°A ~,oo ~~~ o ~, U ~ N ~ ~ ~ on ~ Z ~ ~ a ~ o W ~ U U O O U U N O s., a W F A F U ~~~ a ~~ M Q ~ cd z z ti ~, ~ O1 a d a ~ w w Q ti .: U W A o z F U O o, W c~ d w A w a w a w a w a w a w a w a w a z d z d z d z d z d z d z d z d F F H H H F H Q F Q Q Q Q Q Q Q a U d a a U d a a. U d a a U d a a U d a a v d a a U d a a U d o > x o A W z ~ z ~ H? ~ ~ ~ a ~a j ~ U W W E" W W Q ~ O O r ~h d A ~U O aUA? dU U O H C/1 x F x A H U O A4 rah V A ~~ w '~ ~° ~. a~ a c~ 3 a~ ~. z Q U ~ O O ~ c.~ooA ~--i bO O N ~ b~A N ~ ~ ~ ~ Z ~ ~ O ~ W O U 0 0 U U N O ~. W H A F U ~~~ a°4 ~ °` z~N ~ ~ «s ~ d ~ a ti z ., ~, d °~ a d rn Q ca W w z d ., U W Q ~ O z H U O rn a. W C7 Q F-~ w A Q z a d w z a d w a z d w z a d Q z a d w z a d w z a d Q H d F. d F. Q F. Q H d F. d F, a a ~ d a a ~ d a ~ a d a a ~ d a a ~ d a a ~ d a a ~ d ~. ~. ~ o 0 0 H z°~ x '' a ~ ¢ ~ d E" E"~ w W w~ ~~v z A VF" AUE~-~ a ,wjz ~ W~c7 w ~ r'W~"F"Q c7 ~Oj ~OZ W 0 Ed" O U vwi P .w P~.~a ~ ~az a '" C~G~ a a~ c~ .~ bA .., c~ Q. .., .~ c~ Q °'~ N a~ Q z U p., [~ O N .r ON~~ ~ p O O~ x.~~M ~..~ ci .--~ ,--~ a~~~ N O ~-' a~ O '~ byA ~ b o ~ Q U ~ ~ U O ~, .~ ~ N ao a W is a~ z 0 U U d W F A U ~ ~ O~ a ~~ M ~ ~ ~ W ¢ ~ F a z 0 h WU a Az d d a a >:::;:; z .:::>, '~" 'EOEi~' ,n a <~:: oc w z# z ti ``~> W Q <>`» ~. o z << rn a ~:. ~.; ~ ~ ~ O ~ $ M ~ O C .N-. l~ H O W l~ M O ~n N t+l N V1 O N .mot- .fir A N ~ ~ 0.1 z ~ ~ ~ ¢ H z a d a ¢ a ¢ a w W z p., ~C a ~ A c7 H a ~ ~ a ~" 00 W ~~ H z ~~ xx ~ ~ 3a . a; °~ ~ .b bn a ~ ... a~ o ~ ,~ ~ o U ~ ~ ~ ~ O .~ .~ U O ~ ~ i-a O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O U ' ~ ~ .~ H ~ ,~ ~ H a ~ ~ a .~ H ~' z~ ~ b S ~ `~ W ~ C7 ~ ~ - ~n a~g~ ,~ cv o .~ `~oo~ x~,~M ~, a°~~ o o~' ~~ b ;~~p~q o ~. °o ~ ~ U o ~ .o o ~ ~ a w z 0 U Q A H ~~ a ~~ z~N c~ a ti z ., ~, a a Q U w w a z a d ., z O ~ F w d A U ~ o W z e ~ F Q/ O ~ W a '. Q E, p 8 t+l Obi 8 v~ N O 8 O O~ [~ d' DO ~ ~ N ~V M ~ ~ ~ N c+~'i ~ ~ ~ N ~ A ~--~ N ~--~ N ~--~ ~ M w .a w .a w a w .~ w a z ~ z] z ~ z ~ z a Q F d ~ F d Q F ¢ Q F ¢ ¢ a F a a a a W ~ ~ z ~~ c~i~ ~ Z O U a. O O H ~ ~ ~x ~" Q ~ 7 o ~ H wWZ F W o F C cn v~ a O U O .~ a~ a~ .~ b .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ N ,~ .., ~ ~ ~+~" ~ .~ ~ o ~; U N O ice, C~. U ,~ O O U U ~ ~" ~--~ .~ ~ '~ ~I ~ ~ ,~' O ~+ H U a~ ~H ~ U ~ O a ~„ ~a ~~.~ Z~~~ ~ O ~ W C7 ~ v~ 0 ~ - lr p.~00N N O ~ ~ p O O~ x.~~M ~~~~ ~' N ~ ~ o^' c~n~ ~A pq o U ~ ~ U ~ Yr ~" O ~ ~., a ~ w z 0 U U Q W F A H U ~ ~ .--i a°a ~ °~ a~ A~N z~~ ~ ~ U O a z 0 WU p4 A P~ d a ~ d ~ ~jj;: .....: ...:.: >~''~ °~ d `` #f;~?E ~i;i;S~3:;i ~;3i;E W :~:~;: W :;::~i}~;: '~:':4;F,:: ~::::: >:~z:: W ;:; :::;: '~~ ::.:::: ~~ :::.:: `~~` Q :~ o :;.:::.:: » ::.::.:: z > v :::. ;; : . :.' v ~ ~ s ~ ~ s m F, ~ ~ b N ~ O h V M O [~ Q W F F F H Q Q ~ ~ a Q a d a d a d A ~ a ~ a ~ H W O U A d W u.z ¢ zaa .a Q ] O p; 0 d F ~ ¢ a ~ w ~ w c 7 w z 0 U D- ~ >,ooo a~~oo > 0 0 0 U°o°o ~ ~~ o ;~ a~ ~ ~bQ o Z ~ o ~ o ~ 'd U ~ U U ~ ~ a~ ~ Gj 'o ~, a W H A E-~ U ~~~ o~ a ~~ z~N ~~.+ r~ ~!~ ., z ~, °~ a rn Q w w z H w O " a a ~ ~ °z F U O o, W c7 d w C7 A m ~ ] ~ ~ z z z z Q E-~ Q Q F Q Q F Q Q H d a a a a v ~z a w a ~~H Hww a A ~ti ~ H 3 ~ ~~ o a~ ~~ ~ ~ Q Q U Q d U Q z a~ ~- ~ ~ o ~~o~ ;~~° a~ .~ ~; b ~ a~ ~; ~z ~Q .~ ~ ~ o ~ o U ~ ~ a~ ~° ~" W i.. 0 'd ~. O O U U a ~_ Q .~ 0 a x U x x x ~I A W W O W x pU~ a W F A N U ~~~ a ~~ cri O~~ c~a d ~ a ., z ti ~ ~, O1 a Q a ~ W w ., U W Q 0 z ~- U O W Q ~, A r N ~ N A H z F a Q a Q w ~ 0 H w Q ~z H cd a ~, a~ ... ~. 0 3 .-I C~ .O b d z W O 0 - CD Q - Co BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment C May 23, 1995 BOND PROJECTS COMPLETED DRAINAGE: Mt. Vernon Heights Sierra Drive/Fenwick Drive Green Valley Mason Creek Phase I PARKS AND RECREATION: Walrond Park Soccer Field Northside Realign Fields Bonsack Park Picnic Shelter Vinyard Park I Light Soccer Field Byrd School -Light Baseball Field Starkey Park - 1 Baseball Field Starkey Park - 2 Baseball Fields Facility Repairs -Walrond Office Infield Surface Materials for Baseball Garst Mill Park Playground Starkey Park -Parking Lot Whispering Pines Park Walrond Park 2 Baseball Fields Bonsack Park Ball Field Bonsack Park Playground Equipment Vinyard Park I Parking Green Hill Park - 2 Picnic Shelters Starkey Park -Light 1 Field Facility Repairs -Craig Avenue Center Career Center -Replace Lights Mt. Pleasant Park Brambleton Center Elevator Goode Park -Sewer/Water Lines FIRE HYDRANTS NORTH COUNTY LIBRARY VALLEY TECHPARK C®1~M®I!T`V~~.LTH of V~R~~NIf1. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1401 EAST BROAD STREET DAVID R. GEHR RICHMOND, 23219-1939 JAMES S. GIVENS COMMISSIONER STATE SECONDARY ROADS ENGINEER May 3, 1995 Mr. Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator, Roanoke County P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 Ref.: Report of Changes to the Secondary System of State Highways Additions Made Effective in April 1995 Dear Members of the Governing Body: The enclosed report represents all changes to the secondary system of state highways, within your jurisdiction, that were made effective during April 1995. Additions of these new roads were made under the Department's accelerated acceptance process. Any faults found in the additions documents that require your assistance to correct will be brought to your attention as necessary. New road additions are now an official part of the secondary system of state highways and the resident engineer has been notified to begin maintenance of these new roads. If you have any questions regarding this material, please call this office at (804) 786-2746 or your local resident engineer. Sincerely yours, J~es S. Givens State Secondary Roads Engineer cc: District Administrator Resident Engineer TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY ' > a a a r . ~ O, O, o, ~, a a a .,~. W s v ~ v o a a a N o. ~. ~, G/ \ \ \ 4' M_ M M y \ \ m ~ ~ N O O O O O _ N M O 1 ~ O O O O f Gl i+ i+ L+ O ; 3 O C V t t O L y 7 z 3 O O V 1 ~ M N t(1 N U/ ~ O -. p F F f ~ N O O M ~ U O O P O d' O N O ~ 00 Vl r ~ f0 !- 3 Q L E y ~ E O OJ L ~ O M GC i+ ~i O O ++ m y N N N O/ 41 d O O j j j ~ ~ 0 Q N ' 2 H N Q' N L N d y ~ 2 T 7 v K N z N ~ v w a o ~ i M '^ x v i v i u i H U O O O O C N OC N N N W 3 W z t E O . ~ O ~ N a+ ` U E L O a+ N 2 O w ++ j = m U L H C a+ 7 U ~ U L ~ U N N L N L+ f- y U t ~ ° o ~ a ~ ~ W li ~[ Y ~ N 2 W N v ~ N f0 f0 L N L N t N U U U O N N O tll O y +~ Of a+ m ++ C ~ C C ~ ~ Y y Y y ~[ y N C f0 L U C E O ai a+ a+ N ~ a y c 7 N O Y U O C m O { IN ~, ee b, I e~ 0 0 ~ W 111 ~ fp l- I as i ~ ~~~~` I I ~ N d cN dm > \ i 6 O ~fCM 1~0 7 V W K ~ O i A O I ~ U ~Ya M ~ I i ~ _ ~ W O it.t O J i w V con ~ ~ 7 ~ V c ~ 4 LL I 4 ' L 4 ! C 0 0 a 4 7 d o t > 1 4 i~ I Y t 19 q d F- b >- A O I H 1 w i 1 N- 4 1 Ca OI t- i >~ a I r i t I Y ~ C . O ~ to I i II II I 1 UI CD tl IuMi~e W ~ . O. N ~ a In . ODN N .- P t6 o1~.u `I Ill I I I I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 Lt 1lIC~ N N ~ a N AN N N N eee Dot 0 o e O tO l NODS M ++ ~ i 4~ xi 4 i hl N T i Y M t x i. F 4i 4 4 A w.+f W C i .r q b d ~ d'lLt O Z LL o O o e i7 F3 ^, I n'. I ~: t; ~:. I ~ ~ I R tfi 3 ~ m p S l i i I 7~ I, 'I ~` :I S ~; ' ~ I i c^ 6 I 8 9 9 ! 6 C N L i k~ 6 t I 111h~N+f t1 00 P.•« o.Mt~m.-~ NrtMr~e i I I.-bhi lA Ul< rtMrtMapfl NNM~NI~a u1v.-a INW ttlN~c I ~tDMI' i i aOMI~rtIYt ll Nm`Ila'117aD f• N N N F . NO VIo•-y m M aD .~ u N N ~ 0 M Mi r- ame o Ma~ N o N n N N M M O O d O O i 0 0 0 0 < 0 0 0 0 < 0 0' Iti ~s L leo. taelr M «- CD O L 6 tL O L n. O ~ x «a N H ~ s- • O w Y i -+ F M J I N C I s.+• w M 0 C b 6 ~ C T I 4 ~0 i ~n.d. f O O < 7N x ~ 6 .w p .~ C .. r 1 I~ JF • N. IUmU N N 0 i O O < Yt '.i «-rtaUtMF rtMIlloillt etnariao ~N to r~a I IItIN MMN1~ Ilff~oo Ittal oN iMMPI I^ (Fo W tp.-~t er N ~O KI t m o N e ~ M o III O Nf0 ~ONI Mbft,CN I~N ~-~ a i~iw ~rMiw O SON ~ NN M~ O O~ O b t ooCCCCdd111loef 0 o e o i eye bbl InourfelAt rt b lfl to M m .+ a= i 1a x p nc 1~0 4w H1~ •~+ p p 'b J ~ LL' ~ °u bc' w • ~+ N L~ LLL~' M C i O ~tl 1 1 t-M~.+M i ~oo~•• !EF%~ Sla! 17U1 ~(~t0t N N N N N f I O O d O O t Fl ,. ~~ ~. & .~ ~' ~ ~ i I ~ I I I II ~~ ~K•U1NtDmq ~~OrtoM<t'foF wNN• o lt~ M aD ~d o 0 o rt m tM N IA 1~ 1o N t ~D 7lf~tpot'=tom.- ~MO~111oo+0.~ao. MNO~rtrt~tl aO O~ a0F V'IfIN dFmf I ' I M I' ''. i ~ i I I 1 1' 1 1 MNIA ~olfI07MNO?OI.oMdNO.f ~MOaO.-f- ~oooM~O.JN~oNIJYMI NrtdeUl l~l Ill~db NO+lo~ o+1~F ~P~orNh•dotn7•tM V'--N O+N aD~ N N ~ I ( ~f ~ I MFtit .-~O ~ MN~Ne~{{ N T O!NP1 M fn «+ .- 111 M o o M P Od to M N 0'~ rtl l N o d itl tf1 10 to ~ d o0 F o N o• d T ~o ~ tirpO~ f`eul{.omdaoniiMiii....~~~~vmdtn~• NNC01010 MM ~ a00~~M?NtDt ~I ~ ~ ~ a j ~ i I PIS O~.- I--m ; No•- I -m I eatDf O~rt N Nm NF rtM MaDf oN tD ~O If1111 ~hN'~ CDT If h-«•1 NN Nh• tnrt 'W7 t-o rto~ N N ICO ,- !I rtN I NN+ I f{ I OodOtadoo INNO{f1M Mb1l oodoeOMoo Igo ltld llloe#It1oi olA Ui{NP lilo V'IDd M.-d}t•-V'~ f>aaOiAPIt111~o iMloud1U1N0}fAbi NN R• C~ IaM Mrt MMM YM,oI i "i~ w a O 6 LL YY. C 4Y. ~+ >D V I o .. t: 1 vy Oi C to V .+~pM di ••t~Lf.1iY I aJff~litsa e~cyTh•a M M M M F 0 0 0 0 < !J ., R (~(~ rII >. ~I N~ C C U >E a > mh111 Mtq ~ 7 L O d b d C 1 ~ u u u Y rbN....1N> ~ w N a>~ O 4 w~ d yf4~ w 1 t.a~mn. nal O o 0 7 0. LL L t: L t. ~ O t) I ~- W O O Ri 4 I LCau~0.4tAO Y 7 y M 6 fl .~-~ ~ mm u~~a°vo~ ~C>>Yb•«INUI .+ tr y t L d w W l LLrrrrc.+t.locsfr:~ mo.-NtOd-w< ~Mrt?rt rtln lfi 111 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I ' O O~ • t+ V «Ya ~ > • m h • aul G ~ px.8 1 b A I L ~. ' 4 ~ ! N 3 I I ~ 7 I 1 ~O ~O I 1 O O ~ 3 8 R ~ C R I~oo.+o~ ~ m o N o m {F "' ao I ~fnN~oN c ihh~Inao rt 3~umMWtn ~o do MME c !f W II i M 11 o N ~ a rt ~ jjj! N N V' .- o i o N~ ~'~ o e ff}} I o. 0 I - Irt ~ to i`• v ~ r- F P ~D 0 a I ~ N T 0 t0 N to M N ~O 0 ui 0 1iI d .•~ M M~ n' O .~{ IA P to 4 Ui ` ~, 6D N .~ rt rt M N o. e} Y, ~ ,ca} Y I o w Y ~ • L ~ m • o v en .+ • wij C 2 ,. Ul < C LL ~ CO 1~~ .Ci fN. F ,4J u 4 ! ` L N ~ F4s+ Y w V N• C ~ • V V V L iswc~o-- 070 tOTO. ~. 0 0 1 0 0 i I I I ! ~:. .:alx~~: __/~ O~~ ~ _ ,r .ryl_ ~'. I N O~ N ~ 0 0 , o ~ 0 N 00 W W aci ao 1: O ~ro I ~ ,a 0 t a IA a~ 0 b M C \ ~ror 0 ~ua ~ Is ~ ! C ggroua q W 1 ~NF d 2 L O 7 7C M J ~ •: 1.7 d CI ~ aM x W 'W ~~o t 74 ~v I N L U `N a c. ~ ~ ~.: ~- _~ v ~ cal d E x U? W C ~ W ON 1~ I N I 4 I O~ I I V 1 7 I I m 1 1 i n m t~ 7i v .. i CI a~ W J V C 7 a ro f- C r C9 7a 2 ~ 4 I Y C I rol ~ m O 1 C I ro 1 L 1 al C 1 W 1 r I f. I 7 1 V I ~ ~ I C 1 d I x j W •+ 1 O~ I V I f7! 1 1 I, ~. I~ v ~M F ~o v IN- u W u In n In r o a a c r N ~ a N c c 7 0 m L u e N c f0 l v t T L 1 r ro I .y i w I tL I ~ i o i w c v 7. ~ a 1 O i m I i ., ro L c o ~ .. . U e 6 w 0 M O N e v . v a 77a r 1 O J I~ V~1 0 ` N c i i N a 7n oe oP, .o t i ~ ~~ N• f ' N~ ` F 1 7u 1 M 1 ~D t ` i- . ` ~~ r Ft41 1 I I i` ~ 1 7 J `` I 1 r 1111 y V t de N~ O t a ,. .P a ~0 M N ~ .o N ~ M L i v e F t `W c { e ~o + U1 f f e I P f j p. ~ I`ItA M ~ I , II y ~ !1 M N ~ 1 1 m h ~ 4 C ~ r .. s i e V ~ U N N N O ^. A A -, l i~ ~~' ~' i ' ~ ~ ~ i i A u~o O . 0~ L Vi t o: •- a. In c Mai t YS t F ~ R 1 1 f 1 <f Mt f 1 N1 1 01 0+ 1 M~ } b +~ C O V w 4 F ro L H C mi u~ 4e W~ s~~ Jl b r ni O e a A e. ~~ i FF U1 F CD ~D M I7Y i o P va o .o Y N N 7 ~O M N I!1 M M v~ N ~O P N P 0 N o N 7 M 7 N .. .o r a ~ N ~O T M 7r W ~- N C O !~ C m r V 7~ N M (O. cc ~~ re F~ c°v a o N nn o O A W A n 0 T D Q ~ V' c N L vMO V N M f eNO i o t L o a tID < N < .p ~D l O 7n 1 N ~ tl~ t f ~ W t N f W f 7 M t 4 F a M ~ I 0 o M i e r 1 t M `t :., I ! I INa~o ~ o+cdl tNi m~ IFN abN I m.d}1~f-1 I I ~~ mN~b~ ~ o•~Op ~+l ~roao av ~ M ~ orF-i i QP tr0 MI i M7~ NM ~ N O~ ~ FN. i oe+mNloil ~ vMmM IcD to N.~ .OMTOi F . w YP~diO , Ed M Opl 7u v n~ to ~ In 7u •- ~ II I N T7~N~jjN ~ 1 Q~ WTP1~O IM N ~ i M I M II t?I~I 0111 ~7 q 7NFO~: N MO~Dm W vKNKK~WP` 4 iII ' l7ANN1- IA F~UIO~ AoQ ~N q ~O ~717]I r aom M-- l~ MIA M.-1 .~O fgNo O~ M7N0 l N ,I ~ I M' ~ I i i O L i t> ~ ~ ' ~ U I I O~ I ~. ~ I ~ ~ i m 4 l a u M ~ ~ u ~ w m 6 +~ . + r L C r b O~ ti L .-i .d ~ .~ C C ~ v r 4 q + + t ~ 4 ro7_c d xx«< mv6a a .,ty.ciu ~ ~: ~ ~ ~ i c . r + ~ a F F .. rna c ca as `` L W ~ ~ ~ F ~ p ,i Ed y `N + MM'77 k NNMM oo~o o oo~ ( I ci :~, . ~o N o F O N o i N ~ ~O N r- O~ N o M 7 M m .°- N~ a 0~ N N N NN F~ ifl O~ M .- h C w ro .N. C ro a r. 0 M ~ ~+ U > • s °~ ~Li ~u >°-1°n ~~ O O S 5 1 V C f ~-. , f iM'1 f e l a N 7 t r°r i M f W f T ~ 1 ~ 1 N 1 ~O l M i 171 1 M R • N s w L M ~ I n ~ O _~ e 0 O i L e e A ., i y` i l 1 1 I, 1 l x n x J f S ., _, O- 8` ; c~. ~ I _ . e, ~ a I I o• i ~ N m O O o N 00 ww c4 f- d < d O I 1 O !r I .~i n O O. IA dP d ~ o ~ M i -~ m v I c o 1 .Y T h W j ~ C O ~ 4 LL • ~ O U Q DWI 4 N F ~ O b Z nl.jE Y M J 4N .. IxLL w I ~ O {o ~b p I ^+ C V LL b 1 a~ t ~ _ b ~ c I ~ a O i,,.~ v r a~: W C i W O I F W i >~ N b L J I 7 ~ i V1 I ~ ~ I W' ~ O 2 LL ~ ,~' _ ., t -1 .. .. .. a .. II ICI I 1 I V 1 O~ 1 ~ I m I I 1 U 1 C 1 N I ~ 1 b 1 m I I AI N I 1 nb ul jcl A I C O 1 h71 SCI ~ W 1 m b ~r~ ~m x 1 W 1 Y t V I 7 1 m 1 c:: M• mi N i ~O I N I o. i ~ I 0+ I N~ M1 1 NI 0 o~ O 1 m to 1 ~: O t b ~o . o~ M~ M + z t t y: a L ~+ 1 Jp O C N I` O C I o a+ o .- O m 0 0+ I ~} M J_ N 1 M F ; 7 I ~Nxo {} IM' 4 m I ~ F i b o• #M,°a IF1~ m b c • 01 L 0 b r« m • O E Y L U a -+ i C L +O+ yi M 7 '' i w • c y M N C ~+ O 7 V v O O N F O o ' P .. .. ., '4 7 a ri .. rm olt) 1~NOdo o< W F~ FN-1 oOe ~ m~ ~ U1NN i ~NN ~ W b OOe ~D UI ~ ~ In~a~d ma~0} N N a oo. o~ ••M TTO1 U1?L ~ i N INN i 7N I I ~ ~ ~ y7MQ d o M 0+ 7 1I1m V`, c 1 111 T W c dm~iA 0 ~MON 6 1 W ~ O F N o ' '~ N ~~~ mt-a o+wr Qaou N O a .aom. {ioaa I~-F e A L., 01 0 c o_ c c Y c c- C ! ~ • a. x .Oi ~ W b • b C ~C~ b ~ F n°c~ t1WQ 0 111 a O o O ,. ,. I T M Ili ~O N .- i In F m N m F V m rodooe ~ N m~-do.tc ~ N Y~ d o~ac l Io 01- }IA~te d Il1a1C Q N. v y n r q U C 6 .b+ t1 .Oi o v c m i~, .. iM o % ~aor ~ M C ~~C ~ ~.~1 OL7 7 • M ~ D.f O m > i ~ R n r tai c''+ w ~ o f a. m +o• +ro 1~ o w .~ a ~ d x x O. 4 ~WO i•-~a O N 0 111 to a~ d• a• QI O O O O d R Fl f. ~ R R ~ p R vi ~'? i~ 7 :, `~+ R .. I A P- 8 g R a %IR R k R 6 R R R n C l 1 i 1 I I ~ d ~ ~` l oOO O iooMO V . t-~d tt .o . ~ N od m 1 h 1 N N ~ N i ~ I ~ M ~. tl~ IA mN N T O} 1, 1 t ^ MInW ~ xOM a~ N N N C -- i N o. a -~ M i N N} ~ N N v V' N 1~ o~ O m I m I ! .D .D .a x0 m o .D o. O~ > M N.Ox } N i - m T 111 ~ W ' ' 1 a~ 7 a 111 M m M M 1 m111 M N-1 M R o m ~ aDM o I • M ~ ~ M i I I N I m a~ N l ~ .+1 I N ~ i ! I i 7 I v .d u1 d ~ m ~ m m I I ~o ad m ~ m ~ m .- ~ o r ~ t- o+ o~ `Q m m. 11 I M ~ M ~O ~b ~ l ~ ~ t l W N W a N M ul ~} .- a~ N v c P I a0 ~ ~ ~ 1 1 .; ' N v ~ 7 ui v N m ad , ~ ~ I i al b c ~ .-{ o 7 I Y « ~ 7 I ° v b y I b V i y1 B N O 4 ±~ O m • C r- O fa U a T tl d P C L 1- C '• ~ LL 6 C ~ r Z 9 F J 7 C C V C! ~- ~O O ~ 1QQ~-}} ~ C; O H j w C ! } I M~ i b (7 ~C ~ ~ C L_~ K G1 N I N y rl I ddd~ O O O O O %"~ F R x ~ 7 P 7 5 R .^ S ? R ~ R%'% a R 0. _ .- ,~ l .~ ~y ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 23, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Budget Work Session COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This time is set aside for a final review of the proposed 1995/96 budget. Additional information regarding changes to the salary structure and results of the May 17 CIP discussion will be available. ~".cc' Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) Kohinke To ( ) Minnix Nickens M '~~ County of Roanoke Budget Work Session FY 1995-96 Unallocated funds @ 5/9/95 $298,000 Additional item: Dental Insurance savings 18,500 Total unallocated funds @ 5/17/95 $316,500 Additional funding suggested by the Board of Supervisors and staff: Economic Development-Hanover Direct Turn Lane Additional funding for Cultural/Tourism: Mill Mountain Zoo ($2,000 oper; $10,000 capital) Center in the Square (capital) Science Museum (15,000 oper; $20,000 capital) Virginia Amateur Sports (operating) Additional for Class. Plan Adjustments-Inequities Increase Explore contribution Camp Roanoke-Matching Program P & R-Community Incentive Matching Fund Funding of Greenways Study-5th PDC Adjusted unallocated funds @ 5/23/95 Reductions from previously submitted budget: Courthouse Phone System VWCC-Natural Science Center Blue Ridge Small Business Center Voting Machines-only absentee ($62,500-$15,000) Adjustment of Employee Handbook changes- additional leave @ 15 yrs; no change @ 20 Total @ 5/23/95 $200,000 $12,000 20,000 35, 000 5,000 72,000 40, 000 50,000 50,000 50,000 10,800 (472,800 (156,300) $60,000 $7,250 $2,000 47, 500 50.000 166.750 $10,450 05/19/95,10:17 AM, m:\finance\budget\proposed\adj5-17a.wk4 MEMORANDUM TO: Members Board of Supervisors FROM: Brent Robertson Budget Manager DATE: May 23, 1995 SUBJECT: Capital Improvements Program-Draft Attached you will find a draft copy of the FY 1996-2000 Capital Improvements Program (CIP). This document consists of information submitted by department heads that identifies capital needs related to their functional area over the next 5-year period. At this stage, the draft is intended to provide the Board with an overview of all projects while detailing total costs, descriptions, justifications, possible funding sources and suggested implementation dates. As noted, this document is still in draft form. After additional review and comment by the Board, a final document will be brought to you for adoption and then publication. The CIP is produced for planning purposes only and its adoption does not represent an appropriation of funds for implementation. Therefore, the adoption of the CIP can occur at a time deemed appropriate by the Board of Supervisors. County of Roanoke, Virginia Capital ImpNOVement Program Fiscal Years 1996 - 2000 1996 - 2000 Capital Improvement Program Board of Supervisors H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix Chairman of the Board Edward G. Kohinke, Sr. Vice Chairman of the Board Lee B. Eddy Board Member Bob L. Johnson Board Member Dr. Harry C. Nickens Board Member Elmer C. Hodge, Jr. County Administrator Table of Contents Medium Duty Squad Trucks .................................................40 Upgrade Underground Fuel Storage Tanks ................................. .. 41 Fire Hydrants .............................................................42 Two Ladder Trucks ........................................................43 Bunk Room Additions ......................................................44 Clearbrook Station Addition ................................................. 45 Additional Drive Through Bays ............................................... 46 General Renovations .......................................................47 Heavy Duty Squad Truck ....................................................48 Hanging Rock Public Safety Building .......................................... 49 General Services .............................................................50 Capital Improvement Projects ..................:............................. 51 Vehicle Wash Bays ........................................................52 Microwave System Test Unit ................................................. 53 Freeloader Service Upgrade and Expansion ..................................... 54 Mobile Drop-Off Vehicles ................................................... 55 Residential Automated Curbside Recycling ..................................... 56 Refuse Collection and Vehicle Replacement Program ............................. 57 Library .....................................................................58 Capital Improvement Projects ................................................ 59 Terminal Parity and Support for Integrated Automated System ...................... 60 New Headquarters Library ................................................... 61 Parks and Recreation ............................:.............................66 Capital Improvement Projects ................................................ 67 Camp Roanoke Development ................................................ 68 Garst Mill Park ............................................................ 69 Land Acquisition/District Park ............................................... 70 Green Hill Park Phase III .................................................... 71 North Roanoke Community Recreation Center ................................... 72 Burton Athletic Complex .................................................... 73 Vinyard Park Phase III ...................................................... 74 Walrond Park Phase III ..................................................... 75 Spring Hollow Park .............................................. ........ 76 Family Aquatic Center ...................................................... 77 Brambleton Center ......................................................... 78 Improvements for Parking Areas .............................................. 79 Amphitheater -Green Hill Park ............................................... 80 Whispering Pines Phase III .................................................. 81 Starkey Park Phase III ................................... . .................. 82 Craig Avenue Recreation Center Renovations Phase II ............................ 83 Picnic Shelters ............................................................84 Planning and Zoning .......................................................85 Capital Improvements Projects ............................................... 86 Neighborhood Incentive Fund -Hollins ........................................ 88 Signal Light Installation Fund ................................................ 89 Off-site Drainage Fund .....................................................90 Police ......................................................................91 Capital Improvements Projects ............................................... 92 Phone System Replacement .................................................. 93 Firearms Range/Dixie Caverns Landfill ........................................ 94 Evidence Vault..... .....................................................95 Police Patrol Van ..........................................................96 Office Space ............... ..............................................97 Crime Scene Evidence Response Van .......................................... 98 Procurement .................................................................99 Capital Improvement Projects ...............................................100 Print Shop ..............................................................101 Roanoke County Courts .......................................................102 Capital Improvement Projects ...............................................103 Security Lock System .....................................................104 Courthouse Entrance Renovation ............................................105 New Phone System .......................................................106 Sheriff ....................................................................107 Capital Improvements Projects ..............................................108 Renovation of Roanoke County and Salem Jail .................................109 Utility .....................................................................111 Sewer ..................................................................112 Water ...............................................................113 Appendices .................................................................114 Project Ranking ..........................................................115 Capital Improvement Program R L bD 6~ ~ o ~ ~ '1~ C~ ~ L"+ ~ o ~~ ~ cz ,~ E o ~o ~ >,, °' A o~'~~ U ~ y Or R U e °u' =o .. ~ .. ~ d ~ .. ~ .. ~ .. ~ .. ~ ... ~ ., ~ .. ~a w ~a ~~ a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ c~ ° o 0 o a a o °; r r ~n in a, °~ 0 ° 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 a ~ _ N N O h N r.r ~ O n O1 O °: O °; O o O ° O ° O ° O n ° °i ., . . v n v , • ao o h r» o o v •+ N w r o 0 0 0 0 0 o e o 0 0 0 0 0 o e a o 0 0 0 0 0 o v~ ~n o 0 0 0 0 0 0 ao ao 0 0 0 0 o e e o 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ .: .: v v r r ~ o e~ vi vi o vi o" o" in p~ ~p ~D 00 00 N h .~ O ~ M M O O O r r ~ N N O O •+ ~ r h N N N O O~ h .~ V1 ~ ~ N N nn .w .~ M w ~p ~ O O O O O O O O O ~ O O O a ~ Vi ~r V1 ~ O 1!1 O 00 O r O O . i N Q .r O~ °o °o ~ o °o n y ... O 'O N N Oro O _ b ~ Cc. w r" .: .: o~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O O N O O O O O O O O V1 O V7 O O M O O O M '~ 00 00 O O O " O O O ? O ? O " O t~ O O O t~ u H .: .. ~ ~ ~o ~o o e o o e o o r vi ~o 0 00 _~O^.. O ~O ~D 00 00 r r V7 .~ O h .+ V1 h M ~O ~ ~+ V7 y,U N N O O r+ r+ r r V) N N N N R r O~ h ~O C4 N N N 00 h M 00 ~, '-I;er u ` " • U U U U U U U U U v U U y E-~ a d~ ~ ~ z A A A A U ~ z A A A a m ~ d y u u u e ° d ~ ~ - . u e U ~ a a w ~ e u 0 • a u u m e ~ ~ w °~ E u E L C j e u ~ 7 u pp ~ o - 7 ° U a 0 A a °' ~ C t E ~ 0 ~ w u U ,~"' E o ~ o ~ o ~ ~; ~o ec m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E' °u ~, ° " 3 ° E w e c a o „ ; w u ~ a a E a o '~ ;~ u ++ ~ _ ~_ x U ~ a a 3 v U ~ e ~ ys, a~ m C O Y y ~ ~ C b0 a+ o°o c`n x a w 00 > A a U C7 A ~w V Z C~ ' p °~ Q v u v o °' ~ W r Q ~ v ~` Z y C C C C ~ o = U (j u u u u q ~ y W w • „ o ~ ~ E E E 6 v ~,°, m O a O i ~+ W U C C ~ C O ~ O ~ ~ O ~ o o ~ a r u u r g d U ,y~ . o $ > u u u > u ° W =u = ~ ~ '~ Fo A A A A u W a e C C . • • • v E ~ O O O O ~ ~ C C C C y, L .u U ~ U U W W W W W W W W W R L bD y O x '~ ,yR ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~.+ Y+i ~ O ~ ~ R. as G ~'+ C. A c ~' ~ a U R .~ R U ~d = Y :a L =o a a a a a a a a a a a s a a a ~, ~ O O O ., O O O O O O O O O O O O C7 C7 C7 CO V C9 C7 V C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 V C7 00 °o Oo °o ~ o o ~ ~ ~ M . . N M a O O O O O ~ O O O O a ~ O O N N ~ ~ . -~ N i n R 00 O O O O O O O O O O O O '.... D\ O O O O O O O O O O O O r O O O O V1 O O O O O O N '; D\ O O N O b O O O O O O 00 p~ ~A N P O N 00 V1 O M N O Q ..~ N ~ ~O rr ~ ~ nw N N 00 ~' .a M w r o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ O O O O O O ~ O O O l~ O O O O N O T O O N O O h b O O O h O O N M p~ O M O V1 V1 ~O N 00 VI O M ~ ~ 00 ~O ~O ~ O M M ':y ..r .~ ~p ~"'~ ~"~ M h ~, .r M ' W ° ° ° ° a o o o o ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ M . + N ~ Q ' ~ w - L C o 0 0 O 'O O C fi O 'i-. 3 N r . R A + W O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o r o 0 0 0 o r Y H O O O~ O O V1 M O O O h O O h M O O 0 y: (,~ ~ N h V7 R 00 In l~ 1A ~O Vi N V ~ O M O N M r+ Q '+ M M '+ ~ ~O M O V~ N O w y Y .~ W W W U W W W W U W U U U ~ W U F a Y u:m Z W W W z W _ Z ~ Z z W Z Z W ~ ~ Z W Aa m E O • L ~ O ~" a ~ L a ~ Or ~ ~ Y C Y ~ ~~'. E a F Y Y ~ q = O p o a E ~' > a m E ~° L a C ° ~ ° ~ r :o bD L W , d Y ° ~ O 3 _ v y Y a . . ' o 9 V1 y .: ~ ~ C a 7 m ~ fs. E a ~" , m Y g u L cY a > a ~ a CC c 'i ~ ~ O c a ` a ~ ~ u ~ w °" ~V U d ~ ~ Y -C Y E o n o e o a L F" '° ~ e e = ° o Y ° a ~ cL a E A, O e a _ y o , . ~ Y c ° ~ ~ .o ~ `° ° . a. = e E.. d Y a C ~ 'y' O 7 Y a 7 u a E d u u u ~ u i o '° d ~ '~ > o' °' ~ a o, '~ ~ ~ e W ~x W A u ~ ~ °~ y ~ o a ~ A ~ ~ '- = u o 0 o a •-~ AG ~ c a a _ ° u G ~ ° A ~ a , ~ ~ ~ m " ,, O a L o "Gr L .~ u ~ ~ 3 o " 'o L ec ~o 7 ~o ~ Y o a a, a u . ~ u = > a e L ' a E Y o Y a ~o a o o a .o ~ Y u a w a d Z ~ oo ~ O d ..3 Gz. W~ U d a C7 x x m a u v St Z W ;' F ~' Y 7 Y ~ Y = Y O Y 3 Y O Y 7 Y = Y 3 Y 7 Y 7 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y u V u Y Y Y = Y 7 Y O V 7 Y O Y p+ M Y fA Y Vl Y M Y f/1 Y d1 Y Iq Y Ol Y M Y V! Y M Y d/ Y M Y Vl Y Vl Y N Y A a a a a a a a a a a a a s a a a 9 'C 7 'C 7 7 'O 'O 'O 'C 'O 'O 'fl 7 'II 7 C C = O C C = C C = C C C = C O a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a '- Y L Y L Y L ' Y L Y L Y L ' Y L Y L ' Y L ' Y L ' Y L Y L Y L Y L Y L Y ~ iz ~, w w w w' 'w w w w 'w w 'w w 'w ~. N m n. ~. i ~ ~+ O~ ~' y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ R ~ ~ ~ ~, Q., A ~" ~ .G .. c, R U O C CQ O a O C O U ~d e ~ i~ L ~o a a a a a a a a a a a w~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ as 0 ~ ~ o a 0 0 o o ~ ~ o 0 ~ N [~ N lO~1 V ~O - ~ ..r M M OO ~ ~ W Q~ ~ O O Q R O O O O O O ~ ~ ~ O O Q N ~ ~ b ~ ~ ~ ~ i M . -~ i n Q~ N N O ~ N O O O V ~ '''.. `- ~ ~ O O O t' h ~ O V 7 N t ~ ~ ~ ~ O O ~ ~ .r N nw M VI yr ~O ~A P i . 00 n w l~ °` O O O O O O N ~ O O N ~ O O O .~ O O O ~ ~ fi t~ N M ~ O~ ~ 00 M O~ ~ P N M M M 'V .~ C~ r . r .~ . .~ . O n+ W a O O O N O O O r a ~ w r N W O O O O 0..'O _'L:: C ~ O a~ c~ O O O o O o O O O O N O N O N V) O O O O O V1 O ~O O o N ~O u.. O O~ O O O ~O V) N Q O N t ~ O O^ .d y 'Q o a n [~ o N a 01 a N .• Q v R M N o0 O ~o M M O1 M 00 N `7 ao l~ ~ -7,,..U N Q .•~ V1 O ~ !~ n.i h N Os ni .w M M d' ~~ '` U W W W W ~ W U U U W U F 0.-_ 'Y d=m .7 W A W A W r7 Z W z W z Ga d a w >, O O d0 C 'y C O C u ~ - E u ~ u ~ ~ w g w ~, a z a ~ V a a V ~o ~ 'L°- r~i ~ ~ e r , = .y ~• ~ W ~ a0. L y y ~ 'a O a Z ~ W I:.' U u y L -a O 'O m L 7 a y en o ,Q ~_ 7 ~ C C H . E" ~ ` m u~ ~ % a ~ = O a v A e ~° a E y a. W w •- ~ L E °' q ~ L N 3 V L u 0. ~ m L ~' ~ u ~ o~ a7 ~ ~ ~, d a~ ~ W~ ~ a ` > °' ~ ~o z = v e Wv ~ a a a a~ v v~ s~ °e _~ a o = ' w u o m o t i G d e u u '~ w ~ f » ~ a . f d C7 F Z > C7 ~ ~ ~ ~ c, ~ :: °J :: :: Z :o ~ ,~ 3 3 3 3 d _ 9 'C 'O 'O L I` ~ ~ ~ ~ V F d ~, ~ q - W ~ u ~ .~ •~ ~ C [~ . A ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ L `~ L ~ L L L ~ ~ i v ~ C u C u C u C u O u C ar L O ~ O d .G ~ c~ c~ v t~ t~ a 'a 'a :a :'a :'a 4 f+1 A a R L bD 6~ ~ Ln o a •~ CQ ~ Cw' ~ o °; ~ E a ,r, E L ~ ~ O ~ C ~'+ C. A o~"~~ U ~ 'a R U eo g ~ U .. i~ L ~ ~ ~ O O O O O O O O ~, ,,,, ,., ,.., ,,. ,., ,.,, ,., U U U C7 C7 0~ m m C~ m m m m C7 C7 C7 C7 V C7 C7 a a a 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ °o ~ ~ °v ~ ~ h i°n ~ .,. ~o n v~ a ^~ ~ N N 00 w a a o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p~ Vf ~O O R N O O N ~ h V1 ~"~ 00 a M N O ? N O ~ O to O VI O ~ ~ N ~ . r w r N : 00 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O i O O O O O ~A O V1 O O O O O O O O O : h O~ h ~O O O O ~A N h O M 7 7 O 00 00 ~O VI Vf 00 h N .~ O ~ h O~ O VI O Vi O VI O V7 : .~.~ r+ O Q N ..y N ~ ~ 'r .~ ri N W h o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 e 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~n o v~ 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ N nNr M .-~ ~ r ~ o N o M vi ..r vi .~ ri ..~ .: ..' 0 Q 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 - . ,. . .i N M N R 'r fs. ~ O G O N O M M <- a .w N W : O C _. L .C C ~ O O 'O 'L C N H N a= a - O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ~, . O O O O O O O O O O O V~ O O N O O O O V~ O V~ O O O O O u_ q ~ O\ V1 N O h O '+ O IA M O V1 O O ~D O O\ O O O O O .Q O ` v h rr [~ N ~O ~ 00 Q O O R .~r N N ~ M O 7 N h ..r M h V1 ~ N O\ r+ h ~ M V r+ h N ~A N O N V1 N ~A N ~ O\ a .: ~ r y.: y U ~ U U U U U U U U U U U U U ~ U U U U U ~Er .Y eai' w z ;7 ~ A A Z A A A A Z Z A d d A d A A A A A- a L d C Ir y L u U W i o a ps,,, ~ e ~ j e G G o Y L a E d. a w ~ ,~ R L. w W a ~ - ~. d m > > -~ L d E d -~.i Q A L E G m r~ ~ - E > - . O • C a e Z E E O y „ h Y y G L ' O ~ L C7 ,~ a u > O u ~ d- a ~ j U W a r a a a U r a a H e a = d a G ~- a ~ Y L y Y L ~ ~ = ~ 6 O . eo ~ E ~ Y r Y Y 3 U L W L r 'O r.i 'W ~ Ar •Q, O W +_' 6 a O O O O d G . ed V y ~ _ ~ A • a D. ~ 7 C r O W ~ C ~ ~ ~ t a ~ y u Z R ~ a a a i LO ~ e is .a m w E s :;~ Z ~ ~ '~ b°u ~ U c7 .a t7 z m > 3 ~ w m x d 3 ~ a a a z v~ O o z `c c N a Q ~ C O C O C O C O C O C O C O C O C O C O O O C O C O C O C O C O C O L^t C a m a ~ F ea a~ a u m m is a a a~ m u m a~ m u a u m w ~ u a a~ m u a d s u u a+ y be C ~ L u L u L u L u L u L u L u L u L V L u L u L u L u L u L u L V L u • Q Q ~ '' ad. a s a" a a z a z a a a a a a a a a ~ ~' w A ~ C ~ C ~ C ~ C ~ C ~ C ~ C ~ C ~ G ~ G ~ C ~ C ~ G w C ~ C b C ~ C s O eo 00 00 d0 O IC OC G{ a7 W W A OQ CS A W a7 CC Oi !C 0{ W ~ C ~ C ' C ~ G Er - Y L 1% L 1an L 1 L Y L Y L Y L Y L Y L Y L Y L Y L Y L Y L Y L Y L Y L C C O C C C C C R a m s G6 !Q a a A a R a a3 a c0 a W a W a G6 a 1~ a W a W a W a W a Q s W a. W a. W 'a a a bu0 d G R L CA y O i, o a R ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ..y ai ~ ~ L O ~ C C. c ~cA p ~" ~~i ~ U R 'a. R U C u ~ a ;fl L O p ~,~ O O O O O O O O O O v c~ ~ ~ ~ C7 ~ c~ c~ ~ m O O 00 ~ N O~ 01 00 00 ~ ~ ~ ~ O~ O~ ~ M ~ N 00 O~ ~ N N N N ~ N ^_ r -;. 00 O O ~O ~O ~ ~ O O a A h _. 1 ~ ~ rr 1~/7 IAA N N ~ ~ ~ '" O .~ w ~ a o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o e' a~ e~ a e o o 0 0 0 0 0 ~o a ~ o 0 0 0 " 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 " 0 " .. ~ : °~ O~ vi M o 7 o V r 7 vi O r 00 a O~ a~ O~ o O O r 00 n 00 ~D . ~ rr N .w .w nr ..r R ~ ri ni V1 w °' ° ° ° ° ~ O\ o M o ~ o T o_ ~ o N o ~ rr w O O N c o`' r ~ n ' o '~,. C f7 a"~ o 0 O 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o a r o~ c~ 0 0 0 0 o 0 O 0 o 0 o o v~ N V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~n v~ 0 0 o O v~ v~ c~ u» ° N M O Q O ~p r d' Vl ~ ~ N ~ M ~ M ~ N M O N O ~ N ~ R R ~"~ ~ ` U ~ f ~1 ~. . M M f .~ .+ ~ v u '$ W U U W U U W U U U U ` E.. a : .Y u"~ a D Z Z Z z z Z z Z D. as 9 ~ '~ a a ~ ~ _ ti a, z o ~ a > ~ ~ a _ '= u V u N o • ~ k. W ~+ ,o, e C ~ C °a > > -~ o ~ ~' o y ~ ° w a . ~ a ~ a O ~ w c o U e ~ e E u a ~ e e W C7 G ~ , W a w 7 ~, ~ 8 0 -1 E ' ~ ~ c u ~ W ~ o C ~+ F > ° a ~ ~ ° v a o ° .a u = „ ° ° ° [. v~ » E u u 0+ F ~ a ~, .°e s a o d 'O = `u' E e v 3 '~ C w L ~ w' a O U a. vi U Z a ~ ~ ~ •~ ~ o U r y ~ ~ u c A ~ w ~ ` n: ': ~: ~ F u aCi aci aci w u . . ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ > > 3 ~ a E E E E E E ` U U U °~ a V V L V L L W c c e. a a o. I° °' E U U U `o A A A Q A A A ~` u u u u u u ~ o o a ~ u . ~+ •~ u •~ ~+ .~ ~+ •~ ~ •~ u O O ea C a O a! '% u a° a°. a°. a° a° a° aL o a 0 a 0 a ° a lam. bD y O ~w o a. w CC ~ ~ 6~ O H ~i-i a ~~ ~ O ~ C ~ C ~~'+ d A C ~"~ .G U R .~ R U e~ Y L' V ~-L C ~ = O ~i ~ O O a Q1 w -a a ~o a .. ~o a a .. ~. a a a w a a~ a w L- C O '. .`. O a= c; u L N O r~_V u u u .o F ~` .~ $ e Y m as w ti _O a a F z w F a d 0. W a W O F d d a d O ra C7 a ~ ~ u C C a W > +. L N aq C O ~ 7 .~ ~ e d ~ a~a Y ~pV ~. a ;: ~ c e > w C7 C7 0. vw~> L .~ a a Y u C O u ~ ~ E u a+ d O u 'a 'o •E U W ~ a z a w Q ~' u Y a a a ~ a ~ a `o u 'Y w V. azawe a 7 Clerk of Circuit Court Clerk of Circuit Court Capital Improvement Projects Total Project Description Department Project Project Funding Priority Cost Type Source Imager/Scanner 1 $261,800 C GOR Total Project Type: C -Capital MR -Maintenance and Repair V -Vehicle $261,800 Funding Source: PC -Private Contribution IGA - Intergovernment Assistance BI -Bond Issue GOR -General Operating Revenues 9 PROJECT CATEGORY: PROJECT TITLE: Clerk of Circuit Court Imager/Scanner Prior Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Approved Total Costs Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 $261,800 $261,800 DESCRIPTION This project will provide for the scanning and storage of the various documents related to deeds and titles to properties from the year 1838 to the present. The scanned images will be available for retrieval from on-line magnetic media or CD. JUSTIFICATION Eliminates the immediate need to expand record storage capacity in the Clerk's Office; improves information transfer between the Clerk's Office and all other County offices; improve reviews and updates of current listing of plats in the plat book. FUNDING SOURCES Funding is from general operating revenues. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT N/A at this time. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The project is consistent with the current Comprehensive Plan. 10 ommunications 11 Communications Capital Improvement Projects Total Project Description Department Project Project Funding Priority Cost Type Source 800 MHz Radio System Upgrade Total $2,086,000 C GORBI Project Type: C -Capital MR -Maintenance and Repair V -Vehicle $2,086,000 Funding Source: PC -Private Contribution IGA - Intergovernment Assistance BI -Bond Issue GOR -General Operating Revenues 12 PROJECT CATEGORY: Communications PROJECT TITLE: 800 MHz Radio System Upgrade Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total Costs $2,000 $2,084,000 $2,086,000 DESCRIPTION This project involves the upgrade and expansion of the current 800 MHz radio system. The steps involved include: adding three channels, replacing the oldest repeaters, moving 48 low band users to the 800 MHz system, upgrading to digital microwave, adding four more channels and moving the remaining low band users to the 800 MHz system. JUSTIFICATION The current 800 MHz system has exceeded its current capacity; frequency scarcity for system expansion; low band system problems; aging of some 800 MHz equipment; and an analog microwave system nearing saturation point. FUNDING SOURCES Funding sources are bond issues or general operating revenues. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT N/A at this time. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project type is consistent with the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. 13 Court Service Unit 14 Court Service Unit Capital Improvement Projects Total Project Description Department Project Project Funding Priority Cost Type Source Branch Office in South County or Vinton Area $176,000 C GOR Total Project Type: C -Capital MR -Maintenance and Repair V -Vehicle $176,000 Funding Source: PC -Private Contribution IGA - Intergovernment Assistance BI -Bond Issue GOR -General Operating Revenues 15 PROJECT CATEGORY: PROJECT TITLE: Court Service Unit Branch Office in South County or Vinton Area Prior Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Approved Estimated Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total Costs $157,000 $19,000 $176,000 DESCRIPTION Construction and furnishing a branch office on County owned land in South County or the Vinton area. Total square footage of five offices, aconference/family counseling area and a secretarial waiting room. JUSTIFICATION Facilities in the County Courthouse are currently at maximum occupancy. The Court Service Unit has established justification for two additional. Probation Officers and. one clerical person based on a current caseload. FUNDING SOURCES Funding would be from general operating revenues. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT N/A at this time. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The project is not addressed in the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. 16 Economic Development 1~ Economic Development Capital Improvement Proiects Total Project Description Department Project Project Funding Priority Cost Type Source Hollins Joint Industrial Park 1 $750,000 C GOR/FA Parkway Interpretation Center 2 714,000 C GOR/FA Phase II, Valley Tech Park 3 500,450 C GOR/FA I-81 Corridor Development Site 4 250,000 C GOR/FA Total $2,214,450 Funding Source: Project Type: PC -Private Contribution C -Capital IGA - Intergovenunent Assistance MR -Maintenance and Repair BI -Bond Issue V -Vehicle GOR -General Operating Revenues 18 PROJECT CATEGORY: Economic Development PROJECT TITLE: Hollins Joint Industrial Park Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total Costs $750,000 $750,000 DESCRIPTION Develop vacant 165 acre industrial site in Roanoke and Botetourt Counties. Provide an industrial access road, water, sewer, drainage, private utilities, etc., for industrial site development. Construct a 75,000 sq. ft. expandable shell building. Utilities Project, North County, I-81, Exit 43 (146) Water System. See Utility. JUSTIFICATION The project will provide an economic development opportunity for at least two local governments to address the needs of lack of developable industrial sites. Both Counties can jointly use general funds as leverage for available state (CDBG, RED, Industrial Access) and federal (ARC, FMHA, EDA) funding. FUNDING SOURCES Recommended funding source for this project would be general operating revenue, State grants and Federal assistance. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Increase in operating expense for apart-time Project Manager. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Hollins industrial site is identified on the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan (as amended) and is zoned appropriately in both Roanoke and Botetourt Counties. 19 PROJECT CATEGORY: PROJECT TITLE: Economic Development Parkway Interpretation/Orientation Center Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total Costs $714,000 $714,000 DESCRIPTION Development of a public/private partnership (Virginia Mountain Country) for the phased development of an orientation/interpretation center, folk art center and other public/private uses aimed at serving the traveler on the Blue Ridge Parkway. .TUSTIFICATION This project offers an economic development opportunity for a unique partnership between private sector and locaUstate/federal government to create a destination attraction and orientation facility that will assist the Blue Ridge Parkway/Skyline Drive traveler. The Virginia Mountain Country concept will interpret the mountains of western Virginia and be an introduction to the history and culture of the region. FUNDING SOURCES Recommended funding source would be general operating revenue, state grants, federal assistance and the private sector. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT There is potential for increase in contribution to Roanoke Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau to assist in manning the orientation/interpretation center. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Comprehensive- Plan needs to be amended and re-zoning needs to occur to allow this use. 20 PROJECT CATEGORY: Economic Development PROJECT TITLE: Valley TechPark Phase II Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total Costs $500,450 $500,450 DESCRIPTION Continued site development of Valley TechPark. Phase II would involve site grading, landscaping, entrance sign, signalization, additional land acquisition and utility extensions. JUSTIFICATION Roanoke County owns the industrial park and is expected to provide site improvements equivalent to those being offered at other public industrial parks in the Roanoke Valley. FUNDING SOURCES Funding sources would be general operating revenue. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Funds for site maintenance would be needed annually. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The site is included in the current Comprehensive Plan. 21 PROJECT CATEGORY: Economic Development PROJECT TITLE: I-81 Industrial Site Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total Costs $50,000 $200,000 $250,000 DESCRIPTION This project identifies a potential industrial site in the I-81 corridor and county participation in geologic and environmental testing, site planning, appraisals, public utility extensions and/or obtaining an option to purchase. JUSTIFICATION I-81 has been identified as a state growth corridor. The Roanoke Valley's association with Virginia Tech, the "smart highway" project and the extension of a water transmission line made the I-81 corridor a desirable site for future growth. FUNDING SOURCES Recommended funding sources would be general operating revenue, state grants, federal assistance and the private sector. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT N/A at this time. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1985 Comprehensive Plan will have to be amended and industrial sites re-zoned. 22 Elections/Voter Registration 23 Elections/Voter Registration Capital Improvement Projects Total Project Description Department Project Project Funding Priority Cost Type Source Voting Machines 1 $250,000 Total $250,000 Project Type: C -Capital MR -Maintenance and Repair V -Vehicle Funding Source: C GOR/BI PC -Private Contribution IGA - Intergovernment Assistance BI -Bond Issue GOR -General Operating Revenues 24 PROJECT CATEGORY: Elections PROJECT TITLE: Voting Machines Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total Costs $15,000 $235,000 $250,000 DESCRIPTION New voting equipment to replace current voting machines. This equipment will be stored at the Service Center on Kessler Mill Road. JUSTIFICATION The equipment now in use is more than 35 years old. Storage is a problem. The machines are stored at the Service Center and get very dirty. The new machines would reduce the total number of machines from 87 to 36 and decrease required storage area. Also current machines weigh 600 pounds and the new machines weigh less than 60 pounds each. FUNDING SOURCES Funding would be from general operating revenues. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT N/A at this time. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project is consistent with the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. 25 Engineering 26 Engineering Capital Improvement Projects Total Department Project Project Funding Project Description Priority Cost Type Source Dixie Caverns Landfill 1 $8,437,732 C BI/GOR Stormwater Management/Drainage 2 5,765,000 C GOR/BI County-Wide Road Improvement 3 3,946,000 C BI/GOR (VDOT Revenue Sharing) Geographic Information System 4 510,000 C GOR/UF/ Total $18,658,732 Funding Source: Project Type: PC -Private Contribution C -Capital IGA - Intergovernment Assistance MR -Maintenance and Repair BI -Bond Issue V -Vehicle GOR -General Operating Revenues 27 PROJECT CATEGORY: Engineering PROJECT TITLE: Dixie Caverns Landfill Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total Costs $7,187,732 $250,000 $1,000,000 $8,437,732 DESCRIPTION Dixie Caverns Landfill is located on Twine Hollow Road north of Interstate I-81. The cleanup is underway in accordance with both the Consent Order and the Consent Decree that have been agreed to by the Board of Supervisors. JUSTIFICATION The Board of Supervisors has agreed to this action as outlined in the previously mentioned Consent Order and Consent Decree. FUNDING SOURCES Possible funding sources are bond issue or general operating revenues. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT None. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project type, due to its nature and/or scale is not addressed in the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. 28 PROJECT CATEGORY: Engineering PROJECT TITLE: Stormwater Management/Drainage Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total Costs $1,000,000 $1,905,000 $1,810,000 $1,050,000 $5,765,000 DESCRIPTION Stormwater management will consist of the construction of regional stormwater management facilities as identified in the Master Plan and will also address flood mitigation projects. This funding will also be needed to address federally mandated stormwater quality regulations that are currently being proposed. JUSTIFICATION Roanoke County has committed to participating in a regional stormwater management plan for the purpose of addressing existing and future stormwater management problems. FUNDING SOURCES Code of Virginia allows for the collection of a utility tax, General Operating Budget of the County, and developers. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT None. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. 29 PROJECT CATEGORY: Engineering PROJECT TITLE: County-Wide Road Improvement (VDOT Revenue Sharing) Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total Costs $1,466,000 $480,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $3,946,000 DESCRIPTION This project includes all secondary roads within the County and improvements which include plant mix, drainage, curve widening, road widening, etc. JUSTIFICATION This supplements secondary road funds with the economy as slow as it is. VDOT matches the funds up to a maximum of $500,000. The County receives $1,000,000 in road improvements for a County investment of $500,000. FUNDING SOURCES The proposed source of funding for this project would be the savings in general operating revenue. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT None. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project type, due to its nature and/or scale is not addressed in the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. 30 PROJECT CATEGORY: Engineering PROJECT TITLE: Geographic Information System Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total Costs $170,000 $170,000 $170,000 $510,000 DESCRIPTION A Geographic Information System is "a data management system designed for the entry, storage, analysis, management, and display of data that can be associated with physical locations on the earth." JUSTIFICATION Geographic information is important and it has been estimated that 85 percent of the government's decisions require it. Creating and maintaining this information is a significant expense. The system can save the citizens of Roanoke County money, reduce redundant activities, and improve the quality of accessibility of the information collected. FUNDING SOURCES Possible funding source is the E-911 tax and the General Operating Budget. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT None. Some of the cost may be minimized with Public and Private Partnership. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Geographic Information System will provide timely, accurate information for the analysis of the Comprehensive Plan. 31 Fire and Rescue 32 Fire and Rescue Capital Improvement Projects Total Department Project Project Funding Project Description Priority Cost Type Source Fire Pumper Replacement Program 1 $2,240,000 E GOR Pager Replacement Program 2 570,000 E GOR Ambulance Replacement 3 849,000 E GOR Mount Pleasant Public Safety Building 4 750,000 C BI Station Bay Heaters 5 50,000 E GOR 800 MHZ Base Stations 6 65,000 E GOR Medium Duty Squad Trucks 7 253,000 E GOR Upgrade Underground Fuel Storage 8 160,000 E GOR Fire Hydrants 9 300,000 C GOR Two Ladder Trucks 10 1,200,000 E GOR Bunk Room Additions 11 135,700 C GOR Clearbrook Station Addition 12 140,000 C GOR Additional Drive Through Bays 13 330,000 C GOR General Renovations 14 115,000 MR GOR Heavy Duty Squad Truck 15 363,000 E GOR Hanging Rock Public Safety Building 16 1,500,000 C GOR Total $9,020,700 Project Type: C -Capital MR -Maintenance and Repair V -Vehicle Funding Source: PC -Private Contribution IGA - Intergovernment Assistance BI -Bond Issue GOR -General Operating Revenues 33 PROJECT CATEGORY: Fire and Rescue PROJECT TITLE: Fire Pumper Replacement Program Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total Costs $240,000 $250,000 $1,000,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $2,240,000 DESCRIPTION This project will replace old, worn out trucks stationed throughout the County. JUSTIFICATION The replacement of current used equipment is scheduled for the next five years. In order to maintain current insurance rating, fire pumpers must be replaced on a regular basis. This replacement schedule will replace the oldest vehicles in the Fire and Rescue fleet. FUNDING SOURCES Proposed funding source for this project would be general operating revenues. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT None. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project type is not addressed in the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. 34 PROJECT CATEGORY: PROJECT TITLE: Fire and Rescue Pager Replacement Program roved Prior A Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated pp Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total Costs $330,000 $120,000 $120,000 $570,000 DESCRIPTION This project will replace old emergency service paging systems on Poor Mountain and Ft. Lewis Mountain, station "back up" stations and pagers for all the County volunteers. JUSTIFICATION The existing paging system is outdated and replacement equipment is difficult to obtain. The low band frequency base stations and pagers will no longer be in production in the near future. An updated system will offer County-wide coverage for the volunteers. FUNDING SOURCES Proposed funding source for this project would be general operating revenues. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT None. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project type is not addressed in the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. 35 PROJECT CATEGORY: PROJECT TITLE: Fire and Rescue Ambulance Replacement Program Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total Costs $160,000 $160,000 $305,000 $72,000 $72,000 $80,000 $849,000 DESCRIPTION This project will replace two medium duty squad trucks at Cave Spring and one other rescue squad location. JUSTIFICATION The two squad trucks are requested to replace vehicles that are worn out and undependable. FUNDING SOURCES Recommended funding source for an annually recurring project would be general operating revenues. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT None. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project type is not addressed in the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. 36 PROJECT CATEGORY: Fire and Rescue PROJECT TITLE: Mount Pleasant Public Safety Building Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total Costs $150,000 $600,000 $750,000 DESCRIPTION This CIP project was originally for the Hanging Rock area. The building is still needed, but for Mount Pleasant Fire and Rescue. The Mount Pleasant building needs to be replaced with a larger, more efficient building. JUSTIFICATION The current Mount Pleasant building is not large enough to accommodate the needs of the community. It does not have sleeping facilities, proper offices, showers, etc. FUNDING SOURCES A proposed source of funding for this project would be general obligation bond issue. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT To be determined. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project type is consistent with the general goals, objectives and polices of the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. 37 PROJECT CATEGORY: Fire and Rescue PROJECT TITLE: Station Bay Heaters Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total Costs $50,000 $50,000 DESCRIPTION This project will replace outdated heating systems in the older stations. JUSTIFICATION Current heating systems in the older stations are outdated and not fuel efficient. The current cost for heating the old buildings is three times the amount to heat newer buildings with the new type of heaters. The installation of these heaters will decrease the heating bills for the department and provide an adequate level of warmth in the stations. FUNDING SOURCES The proposed funding source for this project is General Operating Revenues. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT It is anticipated that this replacement program will decrease the annual heating bills for the Fire Stations and decrease the yearly maintenance costs. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project type, due to its nature is not addressed in the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. 38 PROJECT CATEGORY: Fire and Rescue PROJECT TITLE: 800 MHZ Base Stations Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total Costs $65,000 $65,000 DESCRIPTION This project would place 800 MHZ base stations at all public safety buildings. JUSTIFICATION The public safety buildings have no radio communications with the "in transit" units or dispatchers. Personnel currently have to pull a vehicle out of the building and use that radio or use a portable from one of the units. FUNDING SOURCES The proposed source of funding for this project would be general operating revenues. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT None. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project was not identified in the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. 39 PROJECT CATEGORY: Fire and Rescue PROJECT TITLE: Medium Duty Squad Trucks Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total Costs $126,500 $126,500 $253,000 DESCRIPTION This project will replace two medium duty squad trucks at Cave Spring and one other rescue squad location. JUSTIFICATION The two squad trucks are requested to replace vehicles that are worn out and undependable. FUNDING SOURCES Recommended funding source for an annually recurring project would be general operating revenues. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT None. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project type is not addressed in the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. 40 PROJECT CATEGORY: Fire and Rescue PROJECT TITLE: Upgrade Underground Fuel Storage Tanks Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total Costs $80,000 $80,000 $160,000 DESCRIPTION This project will remove and replace underground fuel storage tanks at the following public safety buildings: Cave Spring Fire Station, Catawba, Hollins, Mount Pleasant, Clearbrook, Bent Mountain, Fort Lewis and Masons Cove. JUSTIFICATION The project must be completed by 1998 in order to comply with EPA regulations. FUNDING SOURCES A proposed source of funding for this project would be general operating revenues. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT None. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project type is consistent with the general goals, objectives and policies of the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. 41 PROJECT CATEGORY: Fire and Rescue PROJECT TITLE: Fire Hydrants Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total Costs $150,000 $150,000 $300,000 DESCRIPTION This project will add additional hydrants throughout the County to insure fire protection. JUSTIFICATION The addition of hydrants will increase the number available for fire protection where water lines are available but do not have hydrants. FUNDING SOURCES A proposed source of funding for this project would be general operating revenues. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT None. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project type is consistent with the general goals, objectives and polices of the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. 42 PROJECT CATEGORY: Fire and Rescue PROJECT TITLE: Two Ladder Trucks Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1995-96 1996-97 .1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total Costs $600,000 $600,000 $1,200,000 DESCRIPTION This project would add one new ladder truck and replace one ladder truck. JUSTIFICATION The addition of one ladder truck at the Fort Lewis Station and replacement of an existing ladder truck at Hollins or Cave Spring will give additional resource capabilities for high rise buildings. Current ladder trucks are not adequate to provide resource services to high rise structures. FUNDING SOURCES Recommended funding source for an annually recurring project would be general operating revenues. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT None. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project type is not addressed in the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. 43 PROJECT CATEGORY: Fire and Rescue PROJECT TITLE: Bunk Room Additions Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total Costs $135,700 $135,700 DESCRIPTION This project will provide seven individual cubicles for a coed sleeping dorm at the Catawba, Mount Pleasant and Masons Cove Stations. JUSTIFICATION Rapid response to emergency calls is enhanced by personnel sleeping at the fire and rescue stations. The stations noted above currently do not have sleeping facilities for volunteer personnel. FUNDING SOURCES The proposed source of funding for this project is general operating revenues. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT The additional living space will cause an increase in the station's utility costs. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project type, due to its nature is not addressed in the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. 44 PROJECT CATEGORY; Fire and Rescue PROJECT TITLE: Clearbrook Station Addition Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total Costs $10,000 $130,000 $140,000 DESCRIPTION This project provides the addition of a meeting room, bunk room, and offices at the Clearbrook Station. JUSTIFICATION The existing building at Clearbrook does not have adequate meeting facilities for volunteer personnel. The existing bunk room on the second floor does not meet the fire code (there is no secondary exit on the second floor). The completion of this project will bring all sleeping areas in line with the code requirements. The addition of the meeting room will increase the ability to conduct in-house training. FUNDING SOURCES Recommended funding for this type of capital project would be the general operating revenue. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Increased utility and maintenance cost for the addition of facility space. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project type is consistent with the general goals, objectives and polices of the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. 45 PROJECT CATEGORY: Fire and Rescue PROJECT TITLE: Additional Drive Through Bays Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Funding Estimated 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total Costs $110,000 $220,000 $330,000 DESCRIPTION This project provides for an additional drive through wash bay at Hollins, Bent Mountain, and Fort Lewis stations. JUSTIFICATION The current stations are at capacity and equipment is routinely kept in the wash bay or outside. The addition of one drive through bay at each of these stations will increase the capacity to garage current vehicles and allow~for future expansion. FUNDING SOURCES A proposed source of funding for this project would be general operating revenues. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT The operating budget impact is offset by the cost savings in efficiency. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project type, due to its nature is not addressed in the 1985 Comprehensive Plan 46 PROJECT CATEGORY: Fire and Rescue PROJECT TITLE: General Renovations Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total Costs $30,000 $85,000 $115,000 DESCRIPTION This project involves a variety of renovations to maintain function and appearance to existing structures. JUSTIFICATION Existing structures need a variety of renovations to maintain function and appearance. The addition of 911 lines on the exterior of the buildings is needed to provide immediate access to the dispatcher for citizens at times when stations are not manned. FUNDING SOURCES The recommended funding source for this project is general operating revenues. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Increase in Utility cost. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project type, due to its nature, is not addressed in the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. 47 PROJECT CATEGORY: I Fire and Rescue PROJECT TITLE: Heavy Duty Squad Truck Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total Costs $363,000 $363,000 DESCRIPTION This is a vehicle that carries heavy equipment and would be stationed at Station 3. JUSTIFICATION The Fire and Rescue department currently has one of these vehicles stationed at Station 5 in North County. There is a need to have the same type of unit to cover the South County. FUNDING SOURCES Recommended funding source for an annually recurring replacement program would be general operating revenues. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT , None. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project type is not addressed in the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. 48 PROJECT CATEGORY: Fire and Rescue PROJECT TITLE: ~ Hanging Rock Public Safety Building Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total Costs $1,500,000 $1,500,000 DESCRIPTION This would be a three-bay public safety building with offices, sleeping quarters and storage areas. The planned area is near the intersection of I_81 & Rt. 419 (Hanging Rock). JUSTIFICATION A new facility is needed in this area to improve services and response times. FUNDING SOURCES Funding would be from general operating revenue. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Net Operating Costs for FY 1995-96 through FY 1999-00 would be $665,611. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project has not been addressed in the current Comprehensive Plan. 49 General Services so General Services Capital Improvement Projects Total Project Description Department Project Project Funding Priority Cost Type Source Vehicle Wash Bay 1 $79,000 C GOR Microwave System Test Unit 2 207,900 E GOR Freeloader Service Upgrade/Expansion 3 492,000 E GOR Mobile Drop-Off Vehicles 4 199,000 E GOR Residential Automated Curbside Recycling 5 1,512,000 E GOR Automated Refuse Collection Vehicle Replacement Program 6 1,044,602 C GOR $3,534,502 - _ - - - - ~ - Funding Source: _ - Project Type: _ - PC -Private Contribution - C -Capital IGA - Intergovernment Assistance MR -Maintenance and Repair BI -Bond Issue V -Vehicle GOR -General Operating 51 PROJECT CATEGORY: General Services ~ PROJECT TITLE: Vehicle Wash Bays Prior Approved • Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total Costs $79,000 $79,000 DESCRIPTION Construction of a vehicle wash bays to maintain Solid Waste, Utility, Police, and Parks and Recreation vehicles. The facility will be located on the grounds of the Public Service Center. JUSTIFICATION The runoff from the current activity is in violation of current EPA laws. This project is designed to correct a major deficiency in drain and wash water runoff. The equipment is frequently contaminated with sewer substances, raw garbage, pesticides, lime, paint, etc. FUNDING SOURCES A proposed source of funding for this project would be general operating revenues. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT To be determined. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project type, due to its nature and/or scale, is not addressed in the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. 52 PROJECT CATEGORY: General Services PROJECT TITLE: Microwave System Test Unit Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total Costs $207,900 $207,900 DESCRIPTION Purchase of equipment to give the Communications Shop the ability to provide in-house maintenance for a11800 MHZ equipment. JUSTIFICATION In-house maintenance is considerably cheaper to perform, however, it does take lead time to acquire equipment, training and assume responsibility. Much of the equipment required has already been purchased due to the maintenance program assumed for the mobile and portable radios. FUNDING SOURCES A proposed source of funding for this project would be general operating revenues. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Operating savings will be realized due to the elimination of an outside maintenance contract. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project type, due to its nature and/or scale, is not addressed in the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. 53 PROJECT CATEGORY: General Services PROJECT TITLE: Freeloader Service Upgrade and Expansion Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total Costs $123,000 $123,000 $123,000 $123,000 $492,000 DESCRIPTION The County currently provides a trailer left overnight to aid residents in cleaning up their houses and property. Two trailers are booked weeks and months in advance. Additional equipment would allow staff to service more residents. JUSTIFICATION The service is used year round and is usually booked weeks or months in advance. This service is cost effective in that refuse crews do not have to handle the refuse and it eliminates the temptations for residents to dump trash along the sides of the roads. FUNDING SOURCES A proposed source of funding for this project would be general operating revenue. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT This project would require $50,000 personnel services for additional staff and $30,000 operating expenses for the maintenance of an expanded fleet. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project type, due to its nature and/or scale, is not addressed in the 1985 comprehensive Plan 54 PROJECT CATEGORY: PROJECT TITLE: General Services Mobile Drop-Off Vehicles Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Funding Estimated 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total Costs $199,000 $199,000 DESCRIPTION This project will purchase truck-trailers as mobile drop-off vehicles that would be transported to designated locations on a scheduled basis so residents can drop-off their recyclable materials. Trailers will be compartmentalized to separate different materials. The truck is detachable and can be used to haul other trailers or other refuse business. This project provides for the purchase of two trucks and five trailers. JUSTIFICATION The Board of Supervisors approved the testing of automated recycle collection, however, as part of the overall plan, some rural areas were to be serviced by the drop-off stations rather than door to door. FUNDING SOURCES A proposed source of funding for this project would be general operating revenues. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT This project would require approximately $46,000 for additional staff and $30,000 additional operating expenses for the maintenance of an expanded fleet. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project type, due to its nature and/or scale, is not addressed in the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. 55 PROJECT CATEGORY: PROJECT TITLE: General Services Residential Automated Curbside Recycling Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total Costs $378,000 $378,000 $378,000 $378,000 $1,512,000 DESCRIPTION The County will offer commingled curbside (monthly pickup) to all residents that have automated refuse collection. Others will receive mobile drop-off service. Each home will receive a 60-gallon cart to put all their recyclable materials in. Utilizing the automated vehicles, we will collect the materials once a month. JUSTIFICATION The County is under a state mandate to divert a certain percentage of the materials from the landfill. Curbside recycling is one component of achieving this. Automated collection is less costly and requires less manpower than source separated collection. FUNDING SOURCES A proposed source of funding for this project would be the general operating revenue. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT This project should save the County a substantial amount in tipping fees once it is fully implemented. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project type, due to its nature and/or scale, is not addressed in the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. 56 PROJECT CATEGORY: PROJECT TITLE: General Services Refuse Collection and Vehicle Replacement Program Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated '~ Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total Costs $105,000 $140,000 $149,100 $156,750 $164,584 $329,168 $1,044,602 DESCRIPTION This project will provide a multi yeaz replacement program for all automated refuse collection vehicles. JUSTIFICATION The Vehicle Replacement will maintain adequate service levels for refuse collection. Regular replacement of equipment must occur as age and wear dictates. FUNDING SOURCES A proposed source of funding for this project would be general operating revenues. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Maintenance costs will be minimized with a routine equipment replacement program. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project type, due to its nature and/or scale is not addressed in the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. 57 Library 5g Library Genital TmnrnvPmpn+ U....;o,.+~ Total Project Description Department Project Project Funding Priority Cost Type Source Terminal Parity and Support for Integrated Automated System New Headquarters Library Vinton Parking Lot Expansion Glenvar Branch Expansion/Renovation Meeting Room Furnishings/Equipment Mason's Cove Branch Library Total Project Type: C -Capital MR -Maintenance and Repair V -Vehicle 1 $82,552 E GOR 2 3,360,400 C GOR 3 33,000 C GOR 4 159,250 C GOR 5 28,760 C GOR 6 584,000 C BI $4,247,962 Funding Source: - PC -Private Contribution IGA - Intergovernment Assistance BI -Bond Issue GOR -General Operating Revenues 59 PROJECT CATEGORY: Library PROJECT TITLE: Terminal Parity and Support for Integrated Automated System Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Total Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Costs $32,152 $50,400 $82,552 DESCRIPTION This project will place 14 additional public access terminals and three workstations in four major library facilities (Headquarters, Hollins, Vinton, and Glenvar); upgrade muxprocessor support; prepare for the eventual migration to open architecture and client/server environment; some wiring and cabling must be enhanced or extended to support terminals; appropriate furniture will be needed for some units; workstations will include bar code scanners; printers provided for workstations and public access. JUSTIFICATION This project will improve access to the automated catalog and relieve increased queuing problems at peak periods. The workload on County terminals as measured by circulation alone is 256% higher than on city terminals. To bring terminal workloads within 5% of Salem levels would require 51 terminals (net gain of 17). Terminal parity will also increase productivity of reference and circulation staff, allowing the library to meet currently unfilled demand and to increase response time for informational requests. Increased user access will reduce reliance on staff to conduct routine searches, freeing staff to deal with more complex problems. Current usage levels exceed vendor and manufacturer recommendations; high use levels result in increased deterioration of equipment and frequent repairs. The project is supported by sections VI-6 and VI-9 of the Library's Five Year Plan. FUNDING SOURCES Possible funding source is the general operating revenue. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT A telecommunication costs, a maintenance contract, data processing hardw_ are and software upgrades are needed at $1,000 per year. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, but due to the nature and type of the project, it is not included in the comprehensive plan 60 PROJECT CATEGORY: Library PROJECT TITLE: New Headquarters Library Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Total Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Costs $702,000 $2,658,400 $3,360,400 DESCRIPTION This project will provide a full service 32,000 sq. ft Headquarters Library to serve the citizens of the Cave Spring and Windsor Hills districts. It also will include administrative support space and a technical service processing center for the joint Salem/Roanoke County cataloging operations. JUSTIFICATION The current level of usage has placed considerable stress on the building, and continued growth will be difficult to physically sustain. At peak periods this building experiences critical shortages of work/study and reading seats. Other concerns include current design that limits staff productivity, inadequate electrical and technological infrastructure, and the failure of the building to meet state guidelines for gross square footage. FUNDING SOURCES Funding would come from bond issue or general operating revenues. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Personnel and operating costs would be far less expensive than adding a new branch. Operating costs would be $20,016 in 1998-99 and $35,833 in 1999-00. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - - This project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. - - 61 PROJECT CATEGORY: PROJECT TITLE: Librazy Vinton Pazking Lot Expansion Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Total Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Costs $33,000 $33,000 DESCRIPTION This project will expand the number of parking spaces at Vinton Library from the current 15 to a total of 30 spaces (net gain of 15). State Library standards indicate a need for a minimum of 43 spaces (net gain of 28), and the Library staff recommends 45 (net gain of 30). Unfortunately, only a limited amount of land is available for the needed expansion due to the presence of a well on the adjoining Waz Memorial parcel. An agreement with the Town of Vinton must be reached on the use of the needed land, and stormwater management needs will have to be addressed. This project would place the parking expansion adjacent to current parking parallel to Meadow Street; a currently placed exit from the War Memorial property would bisect the parking area. This exit would be maintained. JUSTIFICATION The 15 pazking spaces at Vinton do not meet the County's current minimum requirements for this type of facility (one space per 300 squaze feet of building space = 32 pazking spaces). It also fails to meet state standards which call for 43 pazking spaces. Usage levels, with more than 95,000 visitors in FY 1992-93, have increased by 22.1 % since 1988. Action is needed to remove this barrier to access, and to avoid a situation which prevents the County and the community from realizing the potential full value of the Vinton Library's building, collection, and services simply because people cannot reach the library. FUNDING SOURCES A proposed source of funding for this project would be general operating revenue. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Funding of $1,000 per year for maintenance is needed. _ RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and is listed in the Community Facilities Plan. 62 PROJECT CATEGORY: Library PROJECT TITLE: Glenvar Branch Expansion and Renovation Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Total Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Costs $18,250 $141,000 $159,250 DESCRIPTION The project will expand the size of the building by 1200 sq. ft and provide additional readers' and work/study seats as well as an enlarged book stack area. Electrical and cabling for automation will be upgraded, and lighting will be improved. Damaged furnishings, fixtures and finishes will be replaced, repaired and/or restored. JUSTIFICATION Public areas of the building need some refurbishment. Upgrades are needed in the areas of electrical and cabling automation. The cramped and .crowded public areas of the building do not effectively support its visitors and circulation transactions. FUNDING SOURCES Funding would be from general operating revenues. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Maintenance costs of $1000 and $1800 in FY 1998-99 and FY 1999-00, respectively. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. 63 PROJECT CATEGORY: Library PROJECT TITLE: Meeting Room Furnishings and Equipment Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Total Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Costs $14,000 $14,760 $28,760 DESCRIPTION This project is needed to enable the full and best use of meeting rooms located in major library facilities system wide. The project will also address some safety problems created by older f~unishings which are causing minor injuries to staff and the public. The basic furnishings and equipment requested in this package are also needed to allow the Library staff to meet the education goals and informational programming objectives of the Library. JUSTIFICATION In FY 1992-93, 28,000 people used Library meeting spaces in Roanoke County, with 11,676 of those attending Library programs. Use of these spaces is important in realizing Library education instructional goals, as well as in meeting a variety of community groups' goals. Proper basic furnishings are needed to replace worn, uncomfortable, and in some cases dangerous, chairs and tables (several chairs and a table have collapsed within the past year, some chairs have jagged plastic edges which rip clothing or cause minor injuries). Presentation and instructional support equipment are needed to facilitate the transfer of information, and to meet the expectation of business, professional, educational, and civic groups. Acquiring these items allows the County to realize a better return on the initial investment. FUNDING SOURCES A proposed source of funding for this project would be general operating revenues. OPERATING BLFDGET IMPACT None. - - _ - RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project is consistent with the general goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, but due to its nature it is not specifically included in the plan. It is supported by sections V and VI of the Library's Five Year Plan. 64 PROJECT CATEGORY: Library PROJECT TITLE: Mason's Cove Branch Library Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated T t l Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 o a Costs $116,000 $468,000 $584,000 DESCRIPTION This project will provide a small branch library of 3,500 square feet with 15 parking spaces. It will bring County library services to a number of citizens who currently use the Salem library, and it will also replace the book station now located in the Catawba Community Center. The branch would include stack space, a reading area and 12 to 15 work/study seats. A programming area for groups of up to 20 would also be included. This library will be designed to meet the popular reading, ready reference, and elementary level homework research needs of the citizens who live in the area served by Mason's Cove School. JUSTIFICATION Approximately 8% of Salem Library's users aze County residents, and according to citizens of the Mason's Cove Civic League, many of those users are from their area. The services offered at the Catawba Book station are rudimentary in nature. The book station does not have a phone and is not linked to the automated system; it has substandazd shelving and a collection of donated books. The proposed project would provide basic library services to residents of the azea, and make those services more conveniently accessible. Given the current population levels of the area, as well as the population density, state standards do not indicate that a library facility is an immediate necessity, but the residents of the area feel that increasing development argues for County investment in public facilities. Between 1980 and 1990 the population in the Mason's Cove Planning Area alone grew from 2,096 to 3,898 for a growth rate of 85%. FUNDING SOURCES A proposed source of funding for this project would be a general obligation bond issue in FY 1997-98.- OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT _ - Budget impact would be increased personnel service of $44,000 and $22,000 operating expenses for the new branch Library. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project is consistent with the general goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. 65 Parks and Recreation 66 Parks and Recreation Capital Improvement Proiects Total Project Description Department Project Project Funding Priority Cost Type Source Camp Roanoke 1 $175,000 MR GOR/BI Garst Mill Park 2 179,000 MR GOR/BI Land Acquisition/District Park 3 1,665,000 C BI Green Hill Park Phase III 4 482,000 C BI N. Roanoke Recreation Center 5 6,000,000 C BI Burton Athletic Complex 6 147,000 C GOR Vinyard Park Phase III 7 520,000 C BI Walrond Park Phase III 8 311,500 C BI Spring Hollow Park 9 400,000 C BI Family Aquatic Center 10 2,725,000 C BI Brambleton Center 11 313,500 C GOR Improvements for Parking Areas 12 570,000 C GOR Amphitheater -Green Hill Park 13 215,000 C GOR Whispering Pines Phase III 14 190,000 C GOR Starkey Park Phase III 15 170,000 C GOR Craig Ave Recreation Center -- Renovations Phase II 16 36,500 MR GOR Picnic Shelters _ 17 160,000 C GOR - Total $14,259,500 Funding Source: Project Type: PC -Private Contri bution C -Capital IGA - Intergovernment Assistance MR -Maintenance and Repair BI -Bond Issue V -Vehicle GOR -General Operating Revenues 67 PROJECT CATEGORY: Parks and Recreation PROJECT TITLE:. Camp Roanoke Development Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Total Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Costs $25,000 $25,000 $125,000 $175,000 DESCRIPTION This project consists of renovating Camp Roanoke as a residential summer camp and retreat center. Renovations include upgrading eight residential cabins, three bathroom/shower facilities, dining hall/kitchen, lodge and the construction of a new pool. JUSTIFICATION This site could potentially become a premier park facility within the system as a major regional park with the potential to generate tourist as well as local interest. Repairs and renovations to Camp Roanoke will provide an exceptional site for youth programs and a revenue producing opportunity to cover the operating cost of the program. The camp has cabins, pool, shelter, dining hall, a lodge, initiatives course, and trails which need improvement. This provides a unique opportunity to develop a one of a kind facility in the region. FUNDING SOURCES Possible funding for this project would be private contributions and general operating revenues. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Operating expenses possibly covered by fees generated by the camp programs. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This-project complies with the Park's Master Plan. - - _ _ - - - 68 PROJECT CATEGORY: Parks and Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Garst Mill Park Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures, by Fiscal Year Estimated Total Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Costs $12,000 $167,000 $179,000 DESCRIPTION Stream bank stabilization, pedestrian trail access, upgrade restroom, additional picnic shelter, improve parking and paving, replace an old inaccessible bridge and landscaping. JUSTIFICATION This should be completed before further damage occurs to park property. It will provide safer and healthier services,-and will expand services as the bridges will improve accessibility for disabled patrons. FUNDING SOURCES ' Funding from general operating revenues or bond issue. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT $8000 for part-time assistance. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN None 69 PROJECT CATEGORY: Parks and Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Land Acquisition/District Park Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total Costs $1,000,000 $65,000 $600,000 $1,665,000 DESCRIPTION This project would purchase of 50+ acres of land in the Southwest County area, and to develop a district park facility. This park would include athletic fields, trails, playground, picnic areas, tennis and basketball courts and open play areas. JUSTIFICATION The Roanoke County Public Facilities Plan for Parks identifies the need for purchasing park land with the priority being District Parks. There are significant deficits in many districts with regard to per capita land standards, with the most crucial need in the Cave Spring and Windsor Hills districts. FUNDING SOURCES Funding would be from bond issue. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT The impact would be $38,000 starting in 1999-00. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This request is identified as a priority in the Comprehensive Plan. 70 PROJECT CATEGORY: Parks and Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Green Hill Park Phase III Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Total Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Costs $32,000 $450,000 $482,000 DESCRIPTION This project will develop Green Hill Park by providing accessible playground, fencing, landscaping, two soccer fields with lights, football field, lights and electricity for special events, parking, outbuildings, and trails. JUSTIFICATION This will continue to develop this site as the County's major events' facility. It will provide for a medium to stimulate and encourage growth in tourism and economic development. FUNDING SOURCES Recommended funding source would be general obligation bond issue. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Estimated annual operating cost is $25,000. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project type is consistent with the general goals, objectives and policies of the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. 71 PROJECT CATEGORY: Parks and Recreation Prior Approved Funding 1995-96 DESCRIPTION $230,000 ~ $5,770,000 ~ $6,000,000 The project proposes to construct a 40,000 sq. ft indoor Recreation Center to include a swimming pool, fitness area, multipurpose program rooms and gymnasium. The facility should be located in an accessible site adjacent to a significant population base. JUSTIFICATION Previous capital plans have identified the need for indoor recreation space to accommodate existing senior, therapeutic and general recreation programs in North Roanoke. Currently, the Parks and Recreation department has no indoor recreation space in North County. Staff has to rely on libraries, churches and schools to meet citizens' needs. The addition of a multipurpose recreation facility will provide North County residents a wide variety of opportunities to participate in quality recreation experiences. A facility of this type could potentially serve the needs of the Glenvar and Catawba residents. FUNDING SOURCES Recommended funding for this project would be a general obligation bond issue. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Net operating costs would be approximately $260,000. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project is included in the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. PROJECT TITLE: North Roanoke Community Recreation Center Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total Costs 72 PROJECT CATEGORY: Parks and Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Burton Athletic Complex Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Total Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Costs $51,000 $72,000 $24,000 $147,000 DESCRIPTION This facility is located adjacent to the Arnold R. Burton Vocational School and serves as the site for adult softball league and tournament play. It contains three regulation softball fields which supplement the state and regional tournaments held at they Moyer Athletic Complex and often is the only site for USSSA and NSA Softball Tournaments. This facility needs to have enlarged and paved parking, permanent restroom and concession building, landscaping, general security lighting, athletic field lighting improvements and playground and picnic shelter. JUSTIFICATION This project contributes to the economic development of the community through tourism. In FY 1992-93 more than 8,000 people visited the Roanoke Valley to participate in tournaments jointly sponsored by Salem and Roanoke county. These out of town guests spent approximately $1.5 million while in the valley. FUNDING SOURCES Recommended funding source would be general operating revenues. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Estimated annual operating cost is $43,600. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project type is consisterit with the general goals, objectives and policies of the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. - 73 PROJECT CATEGORY: Parks and Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Vinyard Park Phase III Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Tot l Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 a Costs $30,000 $490,000 $520,000 DESCRIPTION This project requests funding for a playground, picnic shelters, and basketball courts to complete the master plan. Also included is additional parking, a bridge, trails, utilities, restrooms and other park amenities for the passive development of the Vinyard II tract. JUSTIFICATION This will complete the master plan, and provide a comprehensive regional park in the east County area. Provide for facilities to stage special events and improve tourism and economic development. FUNDING SOURCES A proposed source of funding for this project would be a general obligation bond issue. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Estimated annual operating cost is $27,000. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project type is consistent with the general goals, objectives and policies of the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. 74 PROJECT CATEGORY: Parks and Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Walrond Park Phase III Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated T t l Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 o a Costs $17,000 $244,500 $50,000 $311,500 DESCRIPTION This project will develop Walrond Park by adding a basketball court, expanded improved parking, restrooms and storage, an upgraded playground, grading/drainage, trails, picnic shelter, security lighting, landscaping, and amenities. JUSTIFICATION This will complete the development of Walrond Park as the North County Regional Park. FUNDING SOURCES A proposed source of funding- for this project would be a general obligation bond issue. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT To be determined. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project type is consistent with the general goals, objectives and policies of the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. 75 PROJECT CATEGORY: Parks and Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Spring Hollow Park Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Total Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Costs $220,000 $180,000 $400,000 DESCRIPTION The Spring Hollow Reservoir site and former YMCA Camp are on Dry Hollow Road adjacent to the reservoir. This project consists of developing the 700-acre site around the reservoir as a public park for fishing, hiking, picnicking, and other appropriate outdoor recreation interests. Development of the reservoir depends upon Health, Water, and Utility Department requirements, etc. JUSTIFICATION This site could potentially become a premier park facility within the system as a major regional park with the potential to generate tourist as well as local interests. FUNDING SOURCES A proposed source of funding for this project would be a general obligation bond issue. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Estimated annual operating cost is $165,899 beginning in FY 1997-98. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project is being developed within the Parks Master Plan. 76 PROJECT CATEGORY: Parks and Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Family Aquatic Center Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Total Costs $175,000 $2,550,000 $2,725,000 DESCRIPTION An outdoor, free form designed pool with water slides, a zero depth beach entrance and water play features with a separate child's aquatic playground. Included is a bathhouse/concession stand. This project would require 7-10 acres near a major highway and close to a large population base. JUSTIFICATION There are no public pools in Roanoke County. The Comprehensive Plan indicates the need for public swimming facilities. These types of projects generally generate sufficient revenue to cover all operating and maintenance costs and can contribute to the County's economic development efforts. FUNDING SOURCES ' Funding would come from bond issue. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT N/A at this time. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Comprehensive Plan indicates severe deficits of public swimming facilities in all districts. 77 PROJECT CATEGORY: ~ Parks and Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Brambleton Center Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Total Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Costs $180,000 $50,000 $68,500 $15,000 $313,500 DESCRIPTION Continues the renovation of the former RCAC facility on Brambleton Avenue into a Community Recreation Center with a focus on programming for senior adults, citizens with disabilities, teens and youth. Phase II development will provide carpeting and tile, HVAC improvements, landscaping and picnic area, aesthetic improvements, inside play area for children and improvements to the teen center. JUSTIFICATION Phase I funding will not complete the projects. FUNDING SOURCES Funding from general operating revenues. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT None RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project type is consistent with the general goals, objectives and policies of the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. 78 PROJECT CATEGORY: PROJECT TITLE: Parks and Recreation Improvements for Parking Areas Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Tot l Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 a Costs $315,000 $255,000 $570,000 DESCRIPTION This project will renovate, repair and expand the existing parking lots and access roads at 15 sites. The project consists of installation of base material and asphalt overlay. JUSTIFICATION Designated areas either do not meet zoning ordinances, are inadequate in size, have potholes and damage present, or exhibit a need to improve safe ingress and egress. FUNDING SOURCES Recommended funding source for this project would be general operating revenues. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT None. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project type is consistent with the general goals, objectives and policies of the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. 79 PROJECT CATEGORY: Parks and Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Amphitheater -Green Hill Park Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Total Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Costs $215,000 $215,000 DESCRIPTION This project will develop an outdoor open air amphitheater and related infrastructure at Green Hill Park. JUSTIFICATION The amphitheater would support the major events and provide opportunities for additional major events through association with organizations involved in the arts, lecture series, nature interpretation, concerts, etc. It will provide for regional economic stimulus and tourism. FUNDING SOURCES Recommended funding source would be general operating revenues. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT None. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project complies with the Park's Master Plan. 80 PROJECT CATEGORY: Parks and Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Whispering Pines Phase III Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Total Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Costs $12,000 $178,000 $190,000 DESCRIPTION This project will construct and develop approved restroom facilities, expand parking, add an additional picnic shelter, improve landscaping, upgrade the playground and add fencing. JUSTIFICATION It will meet the criteria for facilities in parks of this classification. FUNDING SOURCES Recommended funding source for this project would be general operating revenues. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT This will be determined when scope of the project is finalized. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project complies with the Park's Master Plan. 81 PROJECT CATEGORY: Parks and Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Starkey Park Phase III Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Total Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Costs $12,000 $158,000 $170,000 DESCRIPTION This project should not be addressed until the School Board finalizes plans for a new high school. This project will construct a restroom, concession, storage building and playground. JUSTIFICATION It will complete master plan development. FUNDING SOURCES Recommended funding source for this project would be general operating revenues. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Approximately $6,000 in additional annual operating expenses would be required to maintain the project. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project complies with the Park's Master Plan. 82 PROJECT CATEGORY: Parks and Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Craig Avenue Recreation Center Renovations Phase II Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Total Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Costs $11,500 $25,000 $36,500 DESCRIPTION This project will install storm windows, floor tiles in the weight lifting and ceramic rooms, window blinds, interior and exterior paint at the Craig Avenue Recreation Center. JUSTIFICATION The storm windows and blinds will result in better energy management and working conditions. Floor tiles are needed for aesthetics and safety concerns. Painting will protect the facility from deterioration and improve aesthetics. FUNDING SOURCES Recommended funding source for this project would be general operating revenues. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT None. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project complies with the Park's Master Plan. 83 PROJECT CATEGORY: Parks and Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Picnic Shelters Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Total Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Costs $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $160,000 DESCRIPTION This project will construct and install accessible picnic shelters at Whispering Pines, Starkey, Craig Center, Mt. Pleasant, Walrond, Good, Stonebridge and Garst Mill Parks. JUSTIFICATION It will meet the public demand for shelter reservations and provide a revenue producing source that supports the maintenance of the facility. This project will improve the recreational opportunities within the County. FUNDING SOURCES Recommended funding source for this project would be general operating.revenues. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT None. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project complies with the Park's Master Plan. 84 Planning and Zoning 85 Planning and Zoning Capital Improvements Projects Total Project Description Department Project Project Funding Priority Cost Type Source Public Road Improvement Fund 1 $250,000 C PC Neighborhood Incentive Fund -Hollins 2 200,000 C PC Signal Light Installation Fund 3 250,000 C PC Off-site Drainage Fund 4 250,000 C PC Total $950,000 Funding Source: Project Type: PC -Private Contribution C -Capital IGA - Intergovernment Assistance MR -Maintenance and Repair BI -Bond Issue V -Vehicle GOR -General Operating Revenues 86 PROJECT CATEGORY: Planning and Zoning ~ PROJECT TITLE: Public Road Improvement Fund Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Total Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Costs $100,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $250,000 DESCRIPTION This project is public road improvements that are constructed at various locations around the County. JUSTIFICATION The improvement of public roads improves the flow and safety of vehicles and pedestrians. Private land development's associated traffic impact often warrants the construction of off-site road improvements to maintain and enhance traffic flow and safety after development occurs. The inclusion of this project in the CIP recognizes this need. State law provides that a private developer may voluntarily proffer to contribute to the cost of such off-site road improvements when a community has recognized the need for improvements and the land proposed for development is subject to a developer requested change in zoning classification. FUNDING SOURCES Recommended Funding Sources would be private contributions. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT None. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. 87 PROJECT CATEGORY: PROJECT TITLE: Planning and Zoning Neighborhood Incentive Fund -Hollins Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Total Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Costs $30,000 $170,000 $200,000 DESCRIPTION This seed money will be used for incentive programs for private property owners to upgrade elements of their properties such as building facades, signs and on-site landscaping. JUSTIFICATION The improvements to US Route 11 (Williamson Road) in the Hollins community are an opportunity to achieve additional enhancements in this corridor. Funding allocated to this project will be used as seed money to construct landscaped gateways at entrances to the corridor. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT No additional operating funds are needed in the initial phase of this program. Program administration will require some additional staff time. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN None 88 PROJECT CATEGORY: PROJECT TITLE: Planning and Zoning Signal Light Installation Fund Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Total Fundin Costs g 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 $100,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $250,000 DESCRIPTION Signal lights installed at various locations around the County. JUSTIFICATION In certain situations, the installation of a traffic signal improves the flow and safety of vehicles and pedestrians at an intersection. Private land development and its associated traffic impacts often necessitate the installation of traffic signals at nearby and affected intersections. These traffic signals maintain and enhance traffic flow and safety after development occurs. The inclusion of this project in the CIP recognizes this need. State law provides that a private developer may voluntarily proffer to contribute to the cost of such facilities, when a community has recognized the need for the facilities, and the land proposed for development is subject to a developer requested change in zoning classification. FUNDING SOURCES Recommended Funding Sources would be private contributions. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT None. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Maintaining and enhancing traffic safety and flow is a policy consistent with the goals. and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. _ _ - - - 89 PROJECT CATEGORY: Planning and Zoning PROJECT TITLE: Off-site Drainage Fund Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Total Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Costs $100,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $250,000 DESCRIPTION An off-site drainage fund. JUSTIFICATION In certain situations, the physical improvement of land can increase off-site drainage flows creating a detrimental situation for downstream properties. Although the County's on-site storm water management requirements are very effective in mitigating peak flows and rates of release, down stream improvements may be justified to fully protect the public's health and safety. The inclusion of this project in the CIP recognizes this need. State law provides that a private developer may voluntarily proffer to contribute to the cost of such off-site drainage improvements, when a community has recognized the need for the improvements, and the land proposed for development is subject to a developer requested change in zoning classification. FUNDING SOURCES Recommended funding source would be private contributions. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT None. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PL-AN Improving stormwater management and protecting the health and safety. of County residents are policies consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. _ - 90 Police 91 Police Capital Improvements Prn;P~t~ Total Department Project Project Funding Project Description Priority Cost Type Source Phone System Replacement 1 $35,000 E GOR Firearms Range/Dixie Caverns Landfill 2 40,000 C G OR/OG Evidence Vault 3 60,000 C GOR Police Patrol Van 4 47,000 E GOR Office Space 5 105,000 C GOR Crime Scene Evidence Response Van 6 55 000 C GOR Total $342,000 _ Funding Source: Project Type: . PC -Private Contribution C -Capital IGA - Intergovernment Assistance MR -Maintenance and Repair BI -Bond Issue V -.Vehicle GOR -General Operating Revenues 92 PROJECT CATEGORY: PROJECT TITLE: Police Phone System Replacement Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Total Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Costs $35,000 $35,000 DESCRIPTION This project will replace the Eagle phone system currently being used in the police department. JUSTIFICATION The Eagle phone system currently in place is five years old. It is part of a computer driven system which frequently requires service calls for problems arising in the software. Newer, more efficient technology is now available. FUNDING SOURCES Recommended Funding source would be general operating revenues. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Maintenance agreement. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project type is not addressed in the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. 93 PROJECT CATEGORY: PROJECT TITLE: Police ~ Firearms Range/Dixie Caverns Landfill Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Total Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Costs $40,000 $40,000 DESCRIPTION This project is for construction of a firearm training facility near the end of Twine Hollow Road. The requested funds will be used to construct a building to house a classroom, bathroom, and storage facilities. In addition, the funds will be used to install electrical service and build the necessary target racks barricades at the site. This project is contingent upon a release of land from EPA. JUSTIFICATION The use of deadly weapons is one of the most dangerous areas of police work. A tremendous amount of potential liability is associated with the use of deadly weapons. Each sworn member of the police department is trained in the use of firearms and is required to carry a firearm at all times. In order to maintain the necessary level of proficiency, officers must train as often as possible. Presently, our officers have no place that they can go and practice with their issued weapons. On a semiannual basis, the department conducts firearms training for all officers. The frequency of this training is mandated by the Commonwealth of Virginia. Currently, we are only able to conduct this mandatory training by using facilities owned by neighboring law enforcement agencies. It is anticipated that the range would be constructed as a joint project between the County and Roanoke City Police. Our department has a very progressive firearms training program. We believe that this training program is largely responsible for protecting Roanoke County from great legal liability in the area of deadly weapons. For many years, the department's firearms instructors have worked very hard to keep our training standards high in spite of the fact that we do not have a place to practice. FUNDING SOURCES Property Maintenance $1,000 per year. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Approximately $800 per year to. include gas, oil and maintenance. _ RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project type is not addressed in the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. 94 PROJECT CATEGORY: PROJECT TITLE: Police Evidence Vault Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Total Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Costs $60,000 $60,000 DESCRIPTION The goal of this project is to build an addition to the building which will house a new evidence vault. The addition will be located in the rear courtyard and share walls with the west wall of the gym and the north wall of the rear hallway. The project will include all walls, roofing, doors, etc., to complete the structure. The total area of the structure will be 1,600 square feet of interior footage. JUSTIFICATION The project is needed to provide secure storage of evidence to be used in criminal proceedings and maintain the legal chain of custody according to the state and federal statutes. The existing vault is being used to house the department's archive files and as an evidence vault. Because of the volume of documents the Department is required to archive (COV 42.1-82), the space in the existing vault is inadequate to house the volume of evidence brought in on a daily basis. The project will provide ample storage space for evidence as the existing vault will be used to house the archive files. FUNDING SOURCES Recommended funding source would be general operating revenues. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Routine maintenance and electricity at a cost of $600 per year. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project type is not addressed in the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. 95 PROJECT CATEGORY: PROJECT TITLE: Police Police Patrol Van Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Total Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Costs $47,000 $47,000 DESCRIPTION This project will purchase a police patrol van for the transportation of prisoners and to serve warrants. The purchase will provide a completely equipped patrol van to include all radio and emergency equipment. JUSTIFICATION The van will provide the highest level of security for those prisoners being transported. This van will almost eliminate the need for transporting prisoners in police cars, with the inherent risks and liability associated with damage to police cars committed by prisoners while being transported, as well as, the extensive cleaning required when a prisoner bleeds or vomits in a patrol car. Should multiple transports be required, one van-transport officer can transport up to eight prisoners, thereby freeing up to eight patrol officers for patrol duty. Also, the expense and inconvenience of installing "cages" in a number of patrol cars can be eliminated. FUNDING SOURCES Recommended funding source would be general operating revenues. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Approximately $800 per year to include gas, oil and maintenance. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project type is not addressed in the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. 96 PROJECT CATEGORY: PROJECT TITLE: Police Office Space .Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Total Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Costs $105,000 $105,000 DESCRIPTION This project will convert a portion of current gymnasium space in the Public Safety Center to usable office and conference room space. The existing heating, ventilation and air-conditioning system will be utilized. The total space involves approximately 1,760 square feet which will require construction of internal wall, floor treatment, electrical service, lighting, lowered ceiling and some furnishings. It will house two division commanders, a secretarial office, a conference room, atraining/library facility and warrants office. JUSTIFICATION Renovation of the Southview Vocational School in 1987 for use as a police office facility was not completed in a fashion that utilized the most effective functional law enforcement office design practices. The command staff (Chief and Captains) is scattered throughout the building. No common conference space was constructed. This project will bring command staff and related support functions to a more centralized location. The conference room would be utilized for department .staff meetings, incident critiques, neighborhood watch meetings, applicant interviews and other meetings with both public and department persons. The training room would accommodate the Department's computerized interactive legal training program purchased to lower training costs by bringing training in as opposed to sending officers out. The area would provide a quiet area for officers to review policies, court rulings and prepare court cases. A portion of the room would be developed into a reference library which is badly needed. The training room would be equipped with a VCR so that use of training tapes available could be viewed without interruption. FUNDING SOURCES Recommended Funding source would be general operating revenues. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Routine maintenance and electricity at a cost of $500 per year. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project type is not addressed in the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. 97 PROJECT CATEGORY: PROJECT TITLE: Police ~ Crime Scene Evidence Response Van Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Total Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Costs $55,000 $55,000 DESCRIPTION New extended body van with a raised roof unit to replace a present outdated and inadequate vehicle. The vehicle to contain emergency lighting, power, communication and response equipment needed to process crime scenes. JUSTIFICATION With the ever expanding science of forensics come new and more useful methods of evidence identification and collection. To remain a competent police agency, we need to have the equipment and resultant abilities of solving crimes in the interest of public safety. Without evidence, you seldom solve crimes. FUNDING SOURCES Funding would be from general operating revenues. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Total for FY 1997-98 through FY 1999-00 would be $2000. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project type is consistent with the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. 98 Procurement 99 Procurement Capital Improvement Proiects Total Project Description Department Project Project Funding Priority Cost Type Source Print Shop Total Project Type: C -Capital MR -Maintenance and Repair V -Vehicle 1 $153,579 C/E GOR $153,579 Funding Source: PC -Private Contribution IGA - Intergovernment Assistance BI -Bond Issue GOR -General Operating Revenues 100 PROJECT CATEGORY: Procurement PROJECT TITLE: Print Shop Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Total Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Costs $99,094 $26,906 $27,579 $153,579 DESCRIPTION This project will procure all equipment and hire all personnel necessary to set up and run an efficient, effective and cost beneficial print shop. The print shop would be located in the basement of the Brambleton Center at 3738 Brambleton Avenue. JUSTIFICATION Roanoke County currently spends approximately $150,000 annually on printing. With an in-house print shop the estimated savings would be $40,000 the first year, and $70,000 annually on printing costs in subsequent years. This shop would provide quality printing for approximately 85% of all county documents from business cards to budget books. In addition to savings on printing, this shop would provide evaluation and recommendations for departmental copiers and a printing contract for jobs requiring special facilities which must come from outside vendors. This would provide additional savings from right sizing copy machines, and establishing a competitive price on selected outside printing. FUNDING SOURCES A proposed source of funding for this project would be general operating revenues and departmental printing expense savings. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT This project would require two additional staff ($55,000) and $10,000 maintenance cost. Operating costs would be offset by revenue generated from the service. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project type is not addressed in the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. 101 Roanoke County Courts io2 Courts Capital improvement Prn:p~+~ Total Project Description Department Project .Project Funding Priority Cost Type Source Security Lock System Courthouse Entrance Renovation Phone System Upgrade Total Project Type: C -Capital MR -Maintenance and Repair V -Vehicle 1 $32,000 C GOR 2 100,000 C GOR 3 60,000 C GOR $192,000 Funding Source: PC -Private Contribution IGA - Intergovernment Assistance BI -Bond Issue GOR -General Operating Revenues 103 PROJECT CATEGORY: PROJECT TITLE: Courts Security Lock System Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Total Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Costs $32,000 $32,000 DESCRIPTION This project involves installation of a computerized security system for all exterior doors of the Roanoke County Courthouse. All interior doors would be re-keyed, and the mechanical locks currently in place would be retained. The new system would have keys with a computer chip that would control access for individual key holders to their limited areas and would restrict times and days of the week they would be allowed to enter these azeas. JUSTIFICATION When the new Roanoke County Courthouse was constructed in 1985, all keys were turned over to maintenance personnel by the contractor, and the Sheriff has not been able to attain control for the facility. Employees have access to unauthorized azeas of the courthouse and the Sheriff has no past or present employee listing of what keys have been issued to whom. FUNDING SOURCES Funding source would be general operating revenues. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT No operating impacts other than periodic replacement keys. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project type is not addressed in the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. 104 PROJECT CATEGORY: Courts PROJECT TITLE: Courthouse Entrance Renovation for Security Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Funding Estimated Total 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Costs $100,000 $100,000 DESCRIPTION This project involves construction of one central entrance to the Roanoke County Courthouse, the installation of a metal detector and a deputy workstation for increased security for citizens and employees conducting court business. JUSTIFICATION Currently there are two separate entrances to the Courthouse facility that lead to various courts. There are no personnel or metal detectors currently in place to prevent weapons or other contraband from entering the facility. FUNDING SOURCES General operating revenues are recommended as funding sources. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Additional personnel would be needed to staff the workstation entrance. A bailiff position with fringe benefits would cost approximately $27,600. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project type is not addressed in the 1985 Comprehensive Plan 105 PROJECT CATEGORY: PROJECT TITLE: Courts New Phone System Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Total Funding 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Costs $60,000 $60,000 DESCRIPTION This project will upgrade the entire phone system in the Roanoke County Courthouse. Areas of concern include Probation and Court Services, J&D Courts, Circuit Courts, Commonwealth Attorney, General District Court and the Law Library. JUSTIFICATION The current phone system has outlived is useful life. The system is obsolete and repair parts are becoming increasingly difficult to obtain. The current functionality of the system does not allow proper communications between various offices and in some cases, does not allow proper communication in the same office. The current system does not have the features necessary to properly conduct the business of the courts. FUNDING SOURCES Funding sources would involve general operating revenues. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Additional features could increase monthly phone charges. Actual charges would depend on the needs of a particular office or user. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project Type is not addressed in the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. 106 Sheriff ~o~ Sheriff Capital Improvements Projects Total Project Description Department Project Project Funding Priority Cost Type Source Renovation of Roanoke County/Salem Jail 1 $1,344,500 C BI/GOR Total $1,344,500 _ Funding Source: Project Type: - - - PC -Private Contribution - C -Capital - ~ ~ IGA - Intergovernment Assistance MR -Maintenance and Repair BI -Bond Issue V -Vehicle - GOR -General Operating Revenues 108 PROJECT CATEGORY: Sheriff Prior Approved Funding 1995-96 $7,500 DESCRIPTION PROJECT TITLE: Renovation of Roanoke County and Salem Jail Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Total 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 Costs $150,000 ~ $1,187,000 $1,344,500 This project will renovate the 6th floor of the Roanoke County -Salem Jail facility located at 401 East Main Street, Salem, to create a dormitory style floor which will contain 26 beds and program space, and adding an additional seventh floor to the existing structure, with the addition of a 54-bed dormitory for direct supervision of minimum security inmates. The jail maintenance shop will be located outside the jail structure, allowing room for expansion of the kitchen facility to enable higher capacity in food services. JUSTIFICATION The current population exceeds capacity of up to 100% on many weekends creating overcrowded conditions that jeopardize the safety of the inmates and staff. FUNDING SOURCES Prior Year Funding (Salem 25% reimbursement of $3,750, State 25% reimbursement of $3,750) *FY 95-96 *FY 96-97 Salem $0 Salem $529,250 State $0 State $390,750 Roanoke County $150,000 Roanoke County $1 187 000 *Other options for County's portion for FY 95-96 or FY 96-97: (G. O. Bonds or IDA) OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT The total operating budget impact would be $762,553 for salaries and benefits for 29 full-time positions and one part-time position, $123,920 for maintenance, vehicle, and equipment. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Conforms to the policies in the Comprehensive Plan. 109 110 Utility (The Utility Department has developed a detailed CIP related to sewer and water projects. Please contact the Utility Department at 387-6104 for further information.) 111 en ~ ~ U c c w ~ COL ~~ ~~~~~ ~ -- ~~ o ° ° 0 ~ 0 ~ c c ~ 0 0 ~ o 00 ~ ~ ° ° c~ o o ° ° o s4 ° o 0 ° ~ ° 0 i °~ ..~ ° 0 o ~ ,--i ~ ~ . s4 00 ~ ~ ~ o0 00 00 ° °o ° °o o° ° ° ° ~ 0 0 0 ° o 0 ° W ~ ° ~ ° o o ° ° o o G1 "C ~-+ p~ (~ b4 ~ ~--~ M ,-~ N O ~' ° M O O O o0 ~ N M ~ ~ MGF} 64 ~ ~ O O O O O O O O O O O ° ° O O O 0 ~ G~1 ~ N O O ° ~ O O 0 O O W ° ~ O O O O ~ ~ ~ M O M N ~ N ~ ~ N_ O ~ M N r- t~ c+j M N ~ '~' ~ 6~? ~ ~ 64 ~ +~. ~ O M N O MO ~O M O N O O O ° OO OO ° ° ~ ~ O N G1 .-. O O 0 0 O O O O OOO 0 0 0 „' ~ ~--~ 00 V'~ N N 'd' V1 01 ~ 00 M 0~0 - cN G°1 ~ 00 ~ N v'i vi O C ~ ~ N .r 00 ""'~ ~ ~--~ O ^" O N 64 64 .-. 64 ~ ~ ~ ~ O p O°° 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O r~+ C O O ~ O O O O C O O O O O O O O O O C O O 0 ~ ~ ~ O O O N N O O O O O ~ N b O 0 i ~ ~ O et GNP 00 ° G ~ ""' ~ ~ ~ ~ o° o° o° o° °°° ° °O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,,,,,~ r?,,,,+ 000 0 0 0o o 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000 ° 000 0 0 0 ea ~ ° o 000 N 0000 riO~n 0 O 'r ~U O~~ O ~ N N d' N 0o N M N .-. ~ O 'ct GN1 O ~ CC ^ ~ ~ ~ ~ N 1-. .-. 1-. ~ N [ O ~ 64 '~7' V W 6 4 N ~ 64 6,g .Q C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ k., ~ ~' '- -° _ ~~ _ _ _ ~ 'o Q a > a .r '- ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ o '~c a ~ .. ~. cn ~ .~ , ... V1 ' cC S N E y y `~ `~' CQ ~ V ~ i. G~ C3 R ~ y N ~ r.+ . .. 3~U ° ~~~ UUUUw ~ aaVU ~ ~ ~ a a ~ ~ , ` ' ~. ... U ~ to vi v~ m ~ ~ . -4 .~E ~ 'C .-. ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ 3 ~ ~~~ 112 m d e ~ L ~.., e o A W p A G% ~ c 0 c~ c~ rr C1 ~1 C1 G1 H 11 L 7 y C d ~ ~' n W ~, L ~ w y ~ • GQ R 3 W o ~ o ~ ~ C C •Q G~1 N L ^' wr 6~ O ~ p ~ O O C V O ~ ~O M O ~ c C ~ .. H M N O w C _ . ~ 00 C\ O O ~ U ° ~ o ~ h O N N .--. to . . N O M p Do ~ O C d v1 O O O R ° et O O vl ~ Q ~+1 V'1 V1 :: U M ~ ~ `"? ~ W 3 3 3 ~ 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ~ ~ 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ~ 3 3 o ° °° h o° ° p0 N ° ° OQ ° ° ° M o °o vi GM1 ~ r o N 64 69 ~..i O O O h O p O O n h O O o 0 ° 0 0 ° C ~ C .-. O O O O O O O O O O O ~ O O O V'1 N ,_ V'1 V1 Vy ~ ~ .--. ~ O ... O .., ~ ~ et N O e'1 M ~ ~ ~ N N ~ N ~ ~ ~ V•1 M ~ ~ rt O O ~ O O ~' et .. ~ N n h ~ ~ 01 M h N 00 ~ 69 6 9 O o O O O N ~ O M h I~ .-. h n 69 64 ~ M n can K 6~9 O C h O O N O O ~ p O ~ O 00 O ~ O O O CO C O N O 69 ^; 64 O O y0j O O ~ O O h C O ~ N O O ~ V O O ~ C O 000 N [~ O O 00 .fir 00 Q; .. .... O O N ~ O V1 n ,.., O N ...: ~ N ~ 00 a0 O C ~ et 00 ..-. ~ M O O C ~ O O N M O of M V'f M O N c~'f V1 O O ~O M O O C C C O C O f~1 et ~O ... et h O O er O O O O O M 00 N M 00 er 0 O O a0 ~' 6R 64 0. - O •y p .y - - - _ L ' = ~ r • ~ a ~ o = a ' ~ ~ °' ~ " ~ ~ o x a' ~ ~ m ~ is ~ ,n i ~ E .. ~ T _ .a ~ ' ~ , x A rn 3 ~n° z w eQ7 > t7 3 0 3 ~ ~ m u °' ~ o ~ h ~ i ~ ~ ~ o s ~ ° ~ n. s •a • . a a U x ~ ~ a ~ ~ z ~ ~ ~ iO o , ca ~ e ~ o ~ ~O ~ •^ ,•~ N ~• v~ ao A U W . 0 w o~ o ... ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ° ° o ^ ; N N N N cn N et N ~ N 113 Appendices 114 a O M M N N N N~ ~..~ ...~ ",~ ~ *r .r •• •- ""'~ nn ~ •~ rr "'~ •••~ ~ *~•~ ~ rC.r .Cn~ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 I~ ~ [~ l~ l~ l~ ~C \O ~O ~C K MIM v 7 7 R ~ U VY ~ R ~ o`n Ca u L y ~ ~ Y7 a p~ Y d er '~ ~ 7 ~ 'V er ~ R ~ ~ > 'y .~. L hu 'L' ai •~ R L C ~..~ L ~ 1~ ~ w w-, a R y O ~ ~ y r. y, ~ R U ~ 8 R ~ U ~o u °~' ~ '~ '~ as a' •° e V - R o Ems, C ~ U ~ ~`, ~." c o oL a a=i E o i ~ ao w ~ ~' G '= as c R R = ~ .O. ... a '- G y>' ~ i :,. = a R o a, y c e > °' rn ~ ~ y ~ a U ~ ° ~ E E ~ ~ u ~ o . U ~ ~ ~ .a ai ~"". a e ~ w~^~. p` .m '~ R ~ L ~ as O ~ ~~ ~ ~•- ~ R L O d aL. w~ C G y =~ ~~ C R 7 L '~'~' R iR. C .c a ~ ~ y ACS "CS fr, ~ a" V .. _ y L •- y E„ A w ~ o a a G O .a L ~ G~ R F ~ ;g QQ ~ O O~ G C/~ O R C ~' ~ ai E C~ R R O ,C O Q~ C O R v C `r~ G a •i+ "~G C ai ~.. G ~ ~,, L 6a C w i O F.i ai ~ C 'Q rQ •yL„. 'R ~' ~ d 7 R ~, .C ~ ,'i~ V ~ y ~ a hC W G >. y '> C 'n ~ U ~ +~.. L " c- °~' c, R a i p; L w R Q'i _d Qr ~ C O R~ R p C ''~ 'ts L y~ ~ ~ O 6' V y d f' R r:. C„,, R ~, O N ~ ~ y >. y ~ R ~~_i a0., u f/~ ._C y=„ a ~ C "' O .00 C R a C/~ ~ ~ C R C/~j -~i 'LS d O CO = a G ~ ~' .~ ~ y p" R d ~ Q V R -~ ~ ~ ~ R x O .` a, ,,.,,; p ^es - y ~ ~ C." C R -~ .'° ~ u ~ ~ -a ° ~ ~ i c m ° y i a R •°- ° ° ~ ~ o e .r U 3 a ~ o ~ d x ~>, '~ q '° ACCG7dGz.Uo°oUFGs.0~.0:dc'CG7 .1,E~j~C7ZC •G.°~' o ~•c ~ i R~c» ~ E 3•~ L _ V1Z-.aGLZGr.COiC'LLLZV]A ~ ~ _ y y d L ~ 3 3 .~ 3 3 Z C Ts :o O ~ +. w .. O C q ~ ++ ++ C~ ~ w~ ;~ R 0 0 0 0 0 ~ F E ~ p '~ c E"i d d V C 6Ci ~ y y R R C~ R R R R~ G G G O O O ," d as 00 ayi a ~~' a bo E P A u=~ ~ V L u ~ u u u as ~ d~ ~ i a~i D o d d W .i ,i ~. ~. ,Q ~ c G c. a> ~ .~ i.; G; d eea +~°. ~ a ~ e' a>i w a>i h ~ ~ u w U u v A ~ d'o^e c e'i a, dav~va~'a ~ ° 'v'v~ C AAA ~+ ~~•L' ~ o a d _c ~ _a a ~ c ~ °' ~,' A A a a ie yy RR o ~ c c c c c an _ = ~ v~ 'a v~ 'er V ~ A •~ ~ •~ _L iR. ~ E d0 i' ~ ~ R ~ ~ x .1C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~-.~~R' C ~ E •~ C R -~R R >> ~ ~ ~ "Q w v1 w w w a u w° a a a w V C~ a `Q ~ .C ~ R R R ~ R R O O O L C L ~ L~ C i4 Qt avw:~aaaaaawwwwvaC~aaa~.~, 115 Y fV f0 o~~ a 2 N r h 0 a d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E- ~I~I~IMIMIMIMIMIMI~I~IMIMIMIMIMIMI~IMIMIMIMIMIMINI~''~I~''~IN R L O C.~ bD +.+ C y~ ~ R o ~ s. u G ,~ L R C R U a ~ w R ~, ,~ e`a a~ C u ~ vi y>+ u ++ o y L u L 8 ~ o Q e E~ +. ~ :: cd O w ~ 'r V U^ d 0 •O U E +' y L O ~ R~ C~ +_+ p~~ w O R O, _C U ar >~. R w ~ L C O dl C ~i ~ ~ rr +:, ~ ~•r L "C W C~ Qr ~ ~ R o •L = o C/~ ~~ O R a°i C y u o :_ O -~. q O L A L R ~p •L ~ R~ R rn C~ Q C O C~ ~~ L ~ ~ L a y R -~+ I~r •y = ~ Q+ dl O C ~ L' , V O L'3 'O Q ~ ~ C LL ~ 1i: C ~ R F~ O y R L t~j ~ •L C L L Q w ~ L ["- R ;.~.3 b~. h L' ~ C ~. O U R S i.. y R G C d ++ .C "Q O q F "O .Q G p C n~ R G~ (~ .C C/1 ~ a°i ,~ r W V C R y o a F >, = .v O .Q 'o R Yv i' > y '= F~ > a ~ .p 7~ u >+ _C ~ .1 L '~ C ~ FQi C C/> > ~ •Q ` R '3R ~ ~• _ Ff, d = ~ ~ G y .Q R (/~ ~ R y •° ~ R ea ~ p W ~ " .C a •L L d kr ° V1 'Y ~+ e E •ee ~ GL ° ° ~ C ~ ~ •~ W ~ > ~e7' G a ~ R L d c _a u A f~ a u ~., mo w. R C _.Q ~ d a+ ' a •O R~ R R O O p~ L O L ~ U= L Go L .c ++ d C _v V ~ cp. R i a°i r u .~...~' ti ~ -"~ o o~° L ~ A L E ~L pD .; .C Or .L A O bD ~ •i ~ ~ () y e is :° G = ~ _ •w°, '~ 'Q 'fl '~ ~ ~ >, d o ~ ° ~ v ~ Gv1 ~ ra v1 E-' C eo h s v ~>>' 3 w' Q-a U rig x > a°o d d oa U C7'.C.R] °~ ~' d.a .u R s ~ ~ ~.~ ~ ~ •~ R- ~ 3 _ ~C7~aa'va30wv~UOc`a~~a` - - a F• ~. F W o 0 c ~ o ~, ~, ~ d~ aRi d d~~ a~ e w w o o ~ cd, ~~ a a ~ a ~ d o A ~~~ h y y H y y d aui aui w E~ ''~' _ W v] ~ 'v 'tt ~ •Q C. U U u a w a~ w d u u C ~' '~' d u q a Q e u d y... H C!~~Cf~~AGL ~ R R=~ c ~ i R RA RA~.m E atr•~•o^Q•o^e~av'v G'~'ssZS c.c~~ d a y y~~ u y 0 0 0 0 C C== Q C C C O~~ R R R R C C C A A (/2 "C7 ~~ v ~~ ~ C C Q +. R R R R R R R R R yy y yy r, L ~" L R R O u d d 6i d d d d Ci C~ L L .Y .Y. .7 ~ C C C V V V R R O V C7 0» CLr p., p~ O O O u . ~• L_ _L L L _L L _L _L .G ,p L i, L, L ~ R R R~ R O d ~ ar G'., ai W W fjr f7r (i Gz~ (7r (jr Gz+ fj. fr, -•7 -a p„ R R •~ L u 116 0 ~O C~ '~ ~ ~ '~t M M N ~-+ er •~ M N M V'l U ~ CC ... w ~ ~ ~ c V o ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ i a a~ ~ ~ ~_ a -a • i a ~ ~ O ~ _U .O ,~ O P1 ~:+ ~ ~ . c ... ° '' ~ ~ s.. O v'~~ ~ ~' " ~~a ~ . . ~, ~ „ . ~s A ~, ~ ~ ~, rA on ~ ,.~ °' .c ~ O ~ ~" U ,~,~ _ "~ Gs., Q a x ~.„ w cc , a .c ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ -o -v •u ~ ~ x ° a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a i ~~ waw a N.~.; ~ a awaa ~~ _~~_ wzzz33333333~3 ~pvAww~~~ti~a~z z a U U i U C C (S. Q M ~--~ •-r N G1 Cif .-.. V1 O 117 AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 23, 1995 RESOLUTION 52395-11 CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the Certification Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson A COPY TESTE: Q..~..P~jc~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Executive Session K ~ ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 23, 1995 RESOLUTION 52395-13 OF CONGRATULATIONS TO OAR GROVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PARENT-TEACHER ASSOCIATION FOR RECEIVING THE STATE AWARD FROM THE NATIONAL PTA WHEREAS, Parent-Teacher Associations are an important and necessary partner in the education of the children of Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, the Parent-Teacher Association at Oak Grove Elementary School was recently named the top Parent-Teacher Association in Virginia by the National PTA; and WHEREAS, the Oak Grove Elementary School PTA received the Advocates for Children Award, an honor created by the National PTA to recognize one unit per state each year; and WHEREAS, the Oak Grove Elementary School PTA was recognized for its campaign to reduce violence in video games and computer software; and WHEREAS, the Oak Grove Elementary School PTA continues to be an outstanding example of teamwork and cooperation among parents, teachers, administration and the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, does hereby extend its sincere congratulations to the OAK GROVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PARENT-TEACHER ASSOCIATION for its recognition as the number one Parent-Teacher Association in Virginia; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board expresses its appreciation to the dedicated parents and teachers involved in the Oak Grove Elementary School PTA. 1 ~ ~~ On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: J~ . -~-t-L~~ Mary H. A len, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Resolutions of Congratulations File Dr. Deanna Gordon, School Superintendent ., , . ~ s~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 23, 1995 RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS TO OAR GROVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PARENT-TEACHER ASSOCIATION FOR RECEIVING THE STATE AWARD FROM THE NATIONAL PTA WHEREAS, Parent-Teacher Associations are an important and necessary partner in the education of the children of Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, the Parent-Teacher Association at Oak Grove Elementary School was recently named the top Parent-Teacher Association in Virginia by the National PTA; and WHEREAS, the Oak Grove Elementary School PTA received the Advocates for Children Award, an honor created by the National PTA to recognize one unit per state each year; and WHEREAS, the Oak Grove Elementary School PTA was recognized for its campaign to reduce violence in video games and computer software; and WHEREAS, the Oak Grove Elementary School PTA continues to be an outstanding example of teamwork and cooperation between parents, teachers, administration and the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, does hereby extend its sincere congratulations to the OAR GROVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PARENT-TEACHER ASSOCIATION for its recognition as the number one Parent-Teacher Association in Virginia; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board expresses its appreciation to the dedicated parents and teachers involved in the Oak Grove Elementary School PTA. T- i AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 23, 1995 ORDINANCE 52395-14 VACATING A PORTION OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY KNOWN AS CAROLYN CIRCLE, THE RIGHT-OF-WAY KNOWN AS COPELAND DRIVE, AND ALL PIIBLIC EASEMENTS LOCATED IN BLOCK 2, LOTS 29 AND 30, BLOCK 3, LOTS 1 THROUGH 4, AND BLOCK 1, LOTS 26 THROUGH 28 (PLAT BOOR 7, PAGE 43), SUGARLOAF HIGHLANDS, SECTION 1, WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Frank D. Porter III and Beverly Porter have requested the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia to vacate a portion of the right-of-way and temporary cul-de-sac known as Carolyn Circle, the right-of-way known as Copeland Drive and all public easements located within Block 2, Lots 29 and 30, Block 3, Lots 1 through 4, and Block 1, Lots 26 through 28 in the Sugarloaf Highlands, Section 1 Subdivision in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District as shown in Plat Book 7, at page 43 of record in the Clerk's Office of the Roanoke County Circuit Court; and, WHEREAS, Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by Section 15.1-431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and a first reading of this ordinance was held on May 9, 1995; and the public hearing and second reading of this ordinance was held on May 23, 1995. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That portion of the right-of-way and temporary cul-de-sac known as Carolyn Circle, the right-of-way known as Copeland Drive and all public easements located within Block 2, Lots 29 and 30, 1 Block 3, Lots 1 through 4, and Block 1, Lots 26 through 28 in the Sugarloaf Highlands, Section 1 Subdivision in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District as shown in Plat Book 7, at page 43 of record in the Clerk's Office of the Roanoke County Circuit Court, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. 3. That Frank D. Porter III and Beverly Porter shall record a certified copy of this ordinance with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and shall pay all fees required to accomplish this transac- tion and in addition, shall be responsible for all costs and expenses associated herewith. 4. That as a condition to the adoption of this ordinance, Frank D. Porter, III and Beverly Porter shall record a final subdivision plat of Longridge Subdivision in the Clerk's Office of the Roanoke County Circuit Court. This subdivision plat and recordation shall be subject to review and approval by the Roanoke County Subdivision Agent. 5. That pursuant to § 15.1-485 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, the Circuit Court Clerk shall write in plain legible letters across the part of the plat vacated, the word "vacated" and also make a reference on the same to the volume and page in which the instrument of vacation is recorded. 2 On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: J~• Mary H. lien, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 3 i ~. "g ..~ .. ~. e~.g ~~-~- 'µ ~~ Gay i .. ROANOKE COUNTY VACATION OF 50 FT. RIGHT-OF-WAY OF COPELADiD DRIVE, PORTION ENGINEERING & OF CAROLYN CIRCLE AND ALL EASE*iENTS A PART OF BLOCK 1, LOTS 26 THROUGH 28, BLOCK 2,_LOTS 29 A_ND 30, BLOCK 3, INSPECTIONS DEPART~rlENT LOTS 1 THROUGH 4 , SUGARLOAF HIGHLANDS , SECTION 1, ~ r RECORDED PLAT BOOK 7 . Pac;F' 4'~ _ it ['/ ACTION # ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 23, 1995 AGENDA ITEM• To vacate western portion of 50 ft. right-of-way and temporary cul-de-sac known as Carolyn Circle, 50 ft. right-of-way known as Copeland Drive in its entirety and all public easements located within Block 2, Lots 29 and 30, Block 3, Lots 1 through 4 and Block 1, Lots 26 through 28 shown on the subdivision of Sugarloaf Highlands, Section 1, recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 43, situated in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The petitioners, Frank D. Porter, III, and Beverly Porter, are requesting the Board of Supervisors to vacate the referenced right-of-ways and easements as shown on the attached map, by ordinance, in order that they may remove these encumbrances on the property and develop their proposed subdivision. BACKGROUND The petitioners, Frank D. Porter, III, and Beverly Porter, are requesting the Board of Supervisors to vacate the western portion of Carolyn Circle, approximately 600 feet in length, all of approximately 220 feet in length of Copeland Drive and all easements shown on the attached map, by ordinance. This action is being requested so that all encumbrances can be removed from the property in order that the petitioners may proceed with the development and platting of the Longridge Subdivision. A portion of Sugarloaf Highlands, Section 1, has been developed. The development portion consists of multifamily dwellings (duplexes) which front on two private streets, Elbert Drive and the developed portion (approximately 640 feet in length) of Carolyn Circle. The western portion of this subdivision where the right-of- ways and easements are shown on the attached map is undeveloped. SiTNIIKARY OF INFORMATION Roanoke County staff is requesting that the described right- of-ways and easements as shown on the attached map be vacated in accordance to Chapter 11, Title 15.1-482 (b) Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended by the adoption of the attached ordinance. The Department of Engineering and Inspections is not aware of any objections to this vacation. County staff has no objection to this proposed vacation on the following condition: 1. That this ordinance does not become effective until Longridge Subdivision plat is approved by Roanoke County and recorded in the County Clerk's Office. The first reading of this proposed ordinance was held on May 9, 1995; Public Hearing and Second Reading is scheduled for May 23, 1995. FISCAL IMPACTS None STAFF RECOMMENDATION The County staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt the proposed ordinance to vacate the referenced right- of-ways and easements and instruct the County attorney in preparation of the ordinance to include the condition requested by staff. ITTED BY: APPROVED BY: .vv~~ Arnold Covey, Dire for Elmer C. Hodge of Engineering & spections County Administrator --------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred Kohinke To Minnix Nickens cc: Paul Mahoney, County Attorney _ ~_,:.. ~_i _ .,, i Rl1 .As ~~`r~~~!±.;1R.'~~ 1 ~~__ ~ :~ I `oe A'ca..i~J/~ ~f~:y:~ .%S K+, e I ROANOKE COUN?'Y VACATION OF .50 FT. RIGHT-OF-WAY OF COPELA.HD DRIVE, PORTION ENGINEERING & OF CAROLYN CIRCLE AND ALL EASE?~NTS A PART dF BLOCK 1 , LOTS 26 THROUGH 28, BLOCK 2,_LOTS 29 AND 30, BLOCK 3, INSPECTIONS DEPARTitilENT LOTS 1 THROUGH 4 , SUGARLOAF HIGHLANDS , SECTION 1 , ~ RECORDED PLAT BOOK 7. PAGE 43. i ~l ~'i .~ T / AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 23, 1995 ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY KNOWN AS CAROLYN CIRCLE, THE RIGHT-OF-WAY KNOWN AS COPELAND DRIVE, AND ALL PUBLIC EASEMENTS LOCATED IN BLOCK 2, LOTS 29 AND 30, BLOCK 3, LOTS 1 THROUGH 4, AND BLOCK 1, LOTS 26 THROUGH 28 (PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 43), SUGARLOAF HIGHLANDS, SECTION 1, WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Frank D. Porter III and Beverly Porter have requested the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia to vacate a portion of the right-of-way and temporary cul-de-sac known as Carolyn Circle, the right-of-way known as Copeland Drive and all public easements located within Block 2, Lots 29 and 30, Block 3, Lots 1 through 4, and Block 1, Lots 26 through 28 in the Sugarloaf Highlands, Section 1 Subdivision in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District as shown in Plat Book 7, at page 43 of record in the Clerk's Office of the Roanoke County Circuit Court; and, WHEREAS, Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by Section 15.1-431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and a first reading of this ordinance was held on May 9, 1995; and the public hearing and second reading of this ordinance was held on May 23, 1995. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That portion of the right-of-way and temporary cul-de-sac known as Carolyn Circle, the right-of-way known as Copeland Drive and all public easements located within Block 2, Lots 29 and 30, Block 3, Lots 1 through 4, and Block 1, Lots 26 through 28 in the Sugarloaf Highlands, Section 1 Subdivision in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District as shown in Plat Book 7, at page 43 of record in the Clerk's Office of the Roanoke County Circuit Court, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to Section 15.1-482(b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. 3. That Frank D. Porter III and Beverly Porter shall record a certified copy of this ordinance with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and shall pay all fees required to accomplish this transac- tion and in addition, shall be responsible for all costs and expenses associated herewith. 4. That as a condition to the adoption of this ordinance, Frank D. Porter, III and Beverly Porter shall record a final subdivision plat of Longridge Subdivision in the Clerk's Office of the Roanoke County Circuit Court. This subdivision plat and recordation shall be subject to review and approval by the Roanoke County Subdivision Agent. 5. That pursuant to § 15.1-485 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, the Circuit Court Clerk shall write in plain legible letters across the part of the plat vacated, the word "vacated" and also make a reference on the same to the volume and page in which the instrument of vacation is recorded. g:\...\may9.95\sugarlof. ord ~'~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MAY 23, 1995 ORDINANCE 52395-15 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN TRACTS OF REAL ESTATE CONTAINING 2.62 ACRES LOCATED AT 7210 FRANKLIN ROAD (TAX MAP NOS. 114.00-1-12f 114.00-1-11) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C- 2, CONDITIONAL, TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF AV, AND GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IN ORDER TO OPERATE A CONTRACTOR~B STORAGE YARD, IIPON THE APPLICATION OF KENNETH MCNEIL. WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on April 25, 1995, and the second reading and public hearing were held May 23, 1995; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on May 2, 1995; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 2.62 acres, as described herein, and located at 7210 Franklin Road (Tax Map Numbers 114.00-1-12 and 114.00-1-11) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of C-2, Conditional, General Commercial District, to the zoning classification of AV, Village Center District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Kenneth McNeil. 3. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use 1 permit to allow the operation of a contractor's storage yard located at 7210 Franklin Road in the Cave Spring Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Compre- hensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1-456 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. 4. That the Board hereby grants a Special Use Permit to Kenneth McNeil to allow the operation of a contractor's storage yard located at 7210 Franklin Road in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. 5. That the owner has voluntarily proffered the following condition: (1) A wooden stockade-type fence shall be constructed on the site as generally shown on the screening plan submitted by Kenneth McNeil. This screening shall be modified in the following ways: (a) The wooden stockade fence, of a minimum height of six feet, shall be installed. The fence shall be in a location, and shall be of a height sufficient, to screen all outside storage associated with the contractor's storage yard. After installation of the fence, no contractor's equipment or supplies shall be visible from Wilson Road or Franklin Road. Stockade type gates shall not be required so long as equipment and supplies are not visible from these roads. (b) The supporting structure of the fence shall be installed on the interior side of the fence. (c) The fence shall be perpetually maintained by the property owner to insure that the effectiveness of the screening is preserved. 6. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Parcel I BEGINNING at a point on the southeasterly side of U. S. Route 220 (Franklin Road, S.W.), said point being corner to the property of Garland H. Overfelt (Deed Book 1024, 2 page 68); thence with said Route 220, N. 38° 25' E. 157.88 feet to an old iron pin, corner to property of Claude Eggleston, et us (Deed Book 1085, page 445); thence leaving said Route 220, and with the line of Eggleston, S. 60° 56' S0" E. 340.64 feet to a point on the line of property of David W. Milam (Deed Book 1242, page 918); thence with the same, S. 29° 24' W. 264.05 feet to an old iron pin at fence corner, on the line of property of Robert M. Overfelt (Deed Book 1301, page 455); thence with the same, and with property of the aforesaid Garland H. Overfelt, N. 44° 24' 50" W. 380.46 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING, and containing 1.72 acres, as shown on survey for Kenneth W. McNeil, dated March 7, 1990, prepared by Jack G. Bess, Certified Land Surveyor, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof; and further known as Official Tax No. 114.00-1-12; and BEING the same property conveyed unto the grantors herein by deed dated July 14, 1977, from Myrtle T. Arrington, widow, of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 1070, page 167. Parcel II BEGINNING at a point located at the southwest intersection of U. S. Route 220 (Franklin Road) and Virginia Secondary Route 900 (Wilson Road); thence with said Route 900 S. 24° 16' 05" E. 354.61 feet to a point on line of property of David W. Milam (Deed Book 1242, page 918); thence with the same, S. 29° 24' W. passing an old iron pin on line at 1.88 feet a total distance of 7.45 feet to a point, being corner to the property of Claude Eggleston, et ux (Deed Book 1070, page 167); thence with the same, N. 60 ° 56' 50" W. 340.64 feet to an old iron pin located on the southeasterly side of Route 220; thence with the same, N. 38° 15' E. 94.65 feet to a concrete monument; thence N. 47° 10' E. 132.4 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING, and containing 0.90 acres as shown on survey for Kenneth W. McNeil, dated March 7, 1990, prepared by Jack G. Bess, Certified Land Surveyor; and further known as Official Tax No. 114.00-1-11; and BEING the same property conveyed unto the grantors herein by deed dated July 7, 1977, from Charles David Rother, et ux, et al, of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 1085, page 445. 7. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts 3 of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance with the condition as clarified in Mr. Harrington's memorandum, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: Supervisor Johnson A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 4 ~~ Roanoke County Department of Planning Memorandum TO: _Fuzzy Minnix, Chairman Board of Supervisors FROM: Terrance L. Harrington, AICP ~ ~' Director of Planning DATE: May 23, 1995 RE: Kenneth McNeil Rezoning and Special Use Permit; Franklin Road; Contractor Storage Yard Per our discussion, here is some suggested language for Special Use Permit conditions: 1. A wooden stockade-type fence shall be constructed on the site as generally shown on the screening plan submitted by Kenneth McNeil. This screening plan shall be modified in the following ways: A. The wooden stockade fence, of a minimum height of six feet, shall be installed. The fence shall be in a location, and shall be of a height sufficient, to screen all outside storage associated with the contractor's storage yard. After installation of the fence, no contractors equipment or supplies shall be visible from Wilson Road or Franklin Road. Stockade type gates shall not be required so long as equipment and supplies are not visible from these roads. B. The supporting structure of the fence shall be installed on the interior side of the fence. C. The fence shall be perpetually maintained by the property owner to insure that the effectiveness of the screening is preserved. I don't believe that a condition relating to the cleanup of debris or trash down near the creek is necessary as we can have these areas cleaned up using the authority of our county-wide trash and debris ordinance. c: Board of Supervisors Elmer Hodge Mary Allen Paul Mahoney -~- ~,~' PETITIONER: KENNETH MCNEIL CASE NUMBER: 13-5/95 Planning Commission Hearing Date: May 2, 1995 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: May 23, 1995 A. REQUEST Petition of Kenneth McNeil to rezone approximately 2.62 acres from C-2 conditional to AV and obtain a Special Use Permit in order to operate a contractors' storage yard, located at 7210 Franklin Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Commission asked about screening. Ed Natt said that his client will work with staff on this. D. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS 1) A 6-foot minimum height stockade fence to be constructed as shown on the site plan (and along the south side of the antique shop) with the supporting structure of the fence placed on the interior of the lot. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Witt stated that this is an existing site which was already zoned commercial. However he is not pleased with having a commercial establishment in a Rural Preserve area. He moved to recommend approval of the petition with the recommended condition attached to the Special Use Permit. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Ross, Thomason, Hooker, Witt, Robinson NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report _ Other Terrance Ha gton, Se etary Roanoke C my Plamm~g Commission STAFF REPORT • PETITIONER: Kenneth McNeil CASE NUMBER: 13-5/95 B. DESCRIPTION The subject property is comprised of two adjacent parcels located at 7210 Franklin Road. An antique shop and the office for an asphalt maintenance business are located in a building on the 0.90 acre parcel at the southwest corner of Franklin Road (Rt. 220) and Wilson Road (Rt. 900); also, a portion of this lot is used for the storage and repair of the asphalt maintenance equipment. This parcel is zoned C-2 vvith the condition that the zoning revert to B-3 if the operation of selling used furniture and antiques should cease. Adjacent is a 1.72 acre parcel which is mostly an undeveloped hill, however, a portion is used for the storage and repair of the asphalt maintenance equipment. This parcel is zoned C-2 with the condition that no more than five (5) used cars for sale be displayed on the lot and that the zoning revert to A-1 upon sale of the property. Single family dwellings are located on the surrounding properties and are zoned AG-3 except those across Rt. 220 which are zoned AR. PART 1 PREPARED BY: LEE GARMAN DATE: May 2, 1995 T The subject property is located in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS The existing asphalt maintenance business is in violation of the uses permitted in the C-2 zoning district. The nature of this business is to repair existing paved areas such as sealing and marking. The use requires the storage and maintenance of the equipment and supplies used. On March 2, 1995, the applicant received notice from the Planning and Zoning Department of a violation of Section 30-54, USES PERMITTED IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. The corrective action required was to either cease using the property for an asphalt maintenance storage yard or to apply for, and have the property rezoned to an AV District which would allow both the existing antique shop and, with a Special Use Permit, the asphalt maintenance and storage facility (defined as a Construction Yard). The applicant is thus seeking to correct the violation by obtaining the appropriate zoning for the existing use. The AV district permits a Construction Yard with a Special Use Permit and with the following Use and Design standards: 1. The maintenance and repair of all vehicles and equipment shall be conducted within an enclosed building. 2. In addition, the following standards may be considered and set: a. provisions for screening of any vehicles, equipment, materials and storage, b. the maximum height of any structure and any additional setback requirements necessary to compensate for any increased height, c. specific measures to control dust on the site, d. specific levels of noise permitted on the site, as measured at adjacent property lines, e. limit hours of operation. A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PART 11 A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED CONDITIONS / - Location -The property is located on the southwest corner of the intersection of Rt. 220 (Franklin Road) and Rt. 900 (Wilson Road). Historv - In 1980, both parcels of the subject property were rezoned from A-1 to B-3, to allow a used car business with the condition that no more than five (5) vehicles be displayed on the lot, and that the property revert to A-1 upon sale of the property. On May 8, 1984, the 0.90 acre parcel (where the antique business and asphalt office building is located) was rezoned from B-3 to B-2 to allow selling used furniture and antiques with the condition that the property revert to B-3 if this business should not continue. The subject property was purchased by the applicant March 1990 who opened an antique business and also moved an asphalt maintenance business from ~"~"~dnad. Planning Commission records for 7585 Franklin Road, which is also zoned C-2 with conditions specific to used car sales, indicate the asphalt maintenance business was a "grandfathered" use. Business license records show an address change from 7585 Franklin Road to the present location, for the year starting 1991. Zoning approval for this move was not obtained. The applicant has stated he thought the use was permitted since the zoning classification was the same as the previous location. Tooograghv/Vegetation -The 0.90 acre parcel, where the existing antique shop and asphalt office building is located, is flat, developed land. The 1.72 acre parcel has approximately 10,000 square feet which is used in conjunction with the asphalt maintenance yard, the rest of the property is an undeveloped wooded hill. Surrounding Neiohborhood -The Rt. 220 corridor is spotted with several commercial uses; the vicinity of the subject property is primarily single family dwellings. Site Lavout/Architecture -The property is currently developed for and used as an antique shop and asphalt maintenance business employing 10 people. A building which was once a single family dwelling, is used for the antique shop and for the asphalt business office. Two metal storage buildings are located on the property and associated with the storage and maintenance of equipment. The applicant has proposed a six foot stockade fence on the front and along the Wilson Road side of the property, to screen the outdoor storage of material, equipment, and vehicles used for the asphalt business; the other sides of the contractor yard are screened from adjacent properties by a wooded hillside. Future development or expansion, would require site plan review and any applicable regulations. Access -Access is provide off Rt. 220. Traffic Generation/Circulation -The 1993 estimated traffic volume was 21,000 vehicles. VDOT does not have an objection to this request. Fire Rescue/Utilities -Public water and sewer are not available to this site. Roanoke County Fire and Rescue has no objection to this request. A site plan for the existing uses on the property was never submitted for review, therefore the existing site is subject to an inspection by the Fire Marshall to insure code compliance. ~' ~ C. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY 'COMP~iEHENSIVE PLAN The Land Use Designation is Rural Preserve. The applicant's request is contrary to the intent of this designation which allows only limited residential and limited institutional uses. The designation discourages intensely developed land. T 2 PART III STAFF CONCLUSIONS This is a request for rezoning to accommodate an existing use, specifically a construction storage yard. While the antique business is a permitted use in the current C-2 district, the asphalt maintenance business was not a permitted use when it moved to the site in 1990, and therefore is not considered a legal non-conforming use. The applicant has been notified of the violation and if this request is denied the applicant will be given 30 (thirty) days after the final hearing to stop using the property as a contractor storage yard or legal action will be initiated to enforce the zoning regulations. The requested AV district would permit both the antique business and with a Special Use Permit, the asphalt maintenance business. In addition, the Use and Design Standards will require maintenance and repair of all vehicles and equipment to be conducted within an enclosed building and the Planning Commission may recommend the following standards which the Board may consider and set: 1. provisions for screening of any vehicles, equipment, materials and storage, 2. the maximum height of any structure and any additional setback requirements necessary to compensate for any increased height, 3. specific measures to control dust on the site, 4. specific levels of noise permitted on the site, as measured at adjacent property lines, 5. limit hours of operation. The applicant has proposed a 6 foot stockade fence to enclose and screen a portion of the use. The Planning Commission may want to consider if this is sufficient or if additional screening should be provided. If this request is approved, the applicant will be given thirty (30) days to provide any of the above set standards. r~ ., _~-. • • • ~-el~" For staff use only COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 ~.%J7 tj T2 date received• received by: ap~aki n e: !/ PC/BZA da ~ : Y s.J placar ds i ed,: 1 BOS date: Case N tuber: J~~ "~ Check type of application filed (check all that apply): ® REZONING ®SPECIAL USE VARIANCE Applicant's name: Kenneth McNeil ~fe~ ~o N +~Tt YO QOk 2°~tO 8 Phone: 774-0015 R o Av o1Fp~ Vo- 24065 Address: 7210 Franklin Road, Roanoke, Virginia zyo~g Zip Code: Owner's name: Kenneth McNeil Phone: 774-0015 Address: 7210 Franklin Road, Roanoke, Virginia Zip Code: 24065 Location of property: 7210 Franklin Road VA 24065 R k Tax Map Number: 114.00-01- 11 & 12 oano e, Magisterial District: Cave Spring Community Planning Area: Clearbrook Size of parcel (s): 2.62 ± acres sq.ft. Existing Zoning: C-2-C Existing Land Use: Antique Shop Contractor's Storage Yard Proposed Zoning: AV Proposed Land Use: Antique Shop Contractor's Storage Yard ............................. For Sta/f Use Only Use Type: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES g NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES R NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO X eiii'i'i~ii i'i'ii~~ le'E'ii'iiiiii iiiiii'iE iEiii ieii ii?i$i ~i'~~e i~ iEci i'ii Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v ws v ws v % Consultation X 8 1 /2" x 11 " concept plan R Application fee X Application :: Metes and bounds description '~`.. Proffers, if applicable Justification ~~ Water and sewer application X Adjoining property owners l hereby certify that l am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the know/edge and con ent o/ the o r.G~'~ Owner's Signature: ~'~LG~ /~!.-~ L~' .~ For Stall Use Only: Case Number Applicant Kenneth McNei 1 The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. The rezoning will enable a piece of property which has been used for commercial uses for approximately 20 years to be zoned in accordance with its existing use. The property was zoned B-2 Commercial under the old ordinance and was simply c<lrried over to C-2 Conditional at the time of the adoption of the new ordinance. All of the property surrounding the area is zoned agricultural. A commercial use has existed for a period of 20 years. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan designation for the property is Rural Village. The AV zoning with the special exception which would permit the requested use is more in conformity with the comprehensive plan than is the existing zoning. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. The rezoning will have no impact on property itself inasmuch as it will simply allow the existing uses on the property to continue. The existing uses have been on the property since approximately 1990. • ~K 1319P.6 01937 • ~ ~A~D _ ,¢ A~XL ~~/ ,pvAD ~ 2p ~ _ ~ F p,~, ,~ 38" 5 ~ ~ ~5 N o~g~ ~ m 95 (0" C > i ~zs.,. a ~ ~ ,~ Z~.e' ~ ~c J ~ M ono e Z ~ \ ~ ~~~ ~Q~ ~ • • C % 92.92 J ~ o~o 0 - ~ v: ., y1 M Q • K ~0 ~ ~1 ~Q,F \~ M :~~p~r ,1k. !E6~.4L QEfE.QE~/CE oa /a85 P~ ~¢5 i"~ OLD pr/ ~~~~ s ~ T.Z O Ham. OLLWE] ~'¢~' /o'L~ --- - i /32.x. I 3O e V ~~ VO ~~~~ ~~ n~ oo \~, h ~~ / ~v / ~P~ ~~c~ 2 ~' 27 ~~~ti \3 ` y 29~ 24 ~ N1r gib `~"-~~ pA~~~ 2 PG _ /0 p ~ l^ ¢ ii9.p0 jA~- i/O,E: THE .Sr/rs./ECT f:?DPF~ejr /3 NoJ LDGAjEO /~/ SPEG/AL fLgOp /~/i(ZARD Za/ES %I "OK ~ "' ,QS LL°S/G~/AjEQ ~ j/!E sEGRETAR/ 4f /~Fx/S/./G A~/O URA/ pE/<=LOPME.Jr / .,o~. /070,' P6. ,~ ~ SvR/E-y Foe /~Eit/•t/E Jh/ Gt/ /~~'it~E/L DF A 2. ro 2 ,qc,¢~ (joTAL> TaAc, SijuAJ~ AT TirE .~uTHw~ sT EALl'N /NTEQSEC~'/O~/ Of U• 5. ,Qj. ~# QZO A~/O l/i4. SECO,VGtgRy ,QT # 9G}~ -' ~ ~` /N TyL=_ L'A/L= SPR/n/G MAGiST~R/AL ~iSjR/cT ~1ACK 6. iESS .Po,Qn/oK~ CD. , //RG//c//A EY ~cALE : /:: = oo' MAQcf,/ 7, /990 U ERTIfICATE Mo. 3,... J,4cK G. mss 9~ 1010 ,~~ C~~eTifi~o LANO Su,¢~/L~yorz /FO l I1ND ~P NB.W-/23 R902G2 FRAME ~ t+j.~ (.t/ILL/n/G 2 370.c/ ~ ~`' SN M6LE $iq[D yti, i D,/ELL/w,G /.72 AG. t. A - T x .t/o. ,..t //~?OD-/-// o. y0 ,qG. FR.1o .=s ~. SNGO n 0. a FR• jHE)gL ~ SNEO Q i N ~ Qr (V~ ~iQ. PR~~r Z ~ • l~+ \~v ~. • ~r ~ _ 2lo Z ACRES TvTAL ~. o°~r a ~,~-of-W,~r D spaw~~ h N ~ •~ ~ ~~ SCREENING PLAN McNeil Asphalt Maintenance, Inc 7210 Franklin Road Roanoke County Tax ID 114.00-01-11 and 12 FRp,NKLIN ROAD Frame Dwelling r2~' RT 220 Antique Shop/ Office ~~' 24 ft. FR.& Metal _, SHED ~~ ~ ~:: ~ Y HILL ~. 6 f t Sto ~ ~ ckade Fence >> (Supporting structure to be placed on the interior of the lot);~\~\\ 2.62 Acres Tota ~;~.- STORAGE AREA ~ 1rm 't 16 ft. 1 Tz - - ~ ,1 i' ~ ~ ,-C ~ Submitted by ,~. GC! • ~ ~ + -v' ~.-t Kenneth McNeil 7- Z Q NORTH 'T= Z AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MAY 23, 1995 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN TRACTS OF REAL ESTATE CONTAINING 2.62 ACRES LOCATED AT 7210 FRANKLIN ROAD (TAX MAP NOS. 114.00-1-12; 114.00-1-11) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2, CONDITIONAL, TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF AV, AND GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IN ORDER TO OPERATE A CONTRACTOR'S STORAGE YARD, UPON THE APPLICATION OF KENNETH MCNEIL. WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on April 25, 1995, and the second reading and public hearing were held May 23, 1995; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on May 2, 1995; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 2.62 acres, as described herein, and located at 7210 Franklin Road (Tax Map Numbers 114.00-1-12 and 114.00-1-11) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of C-2, Conditional, General Commercial District, to the zoning classification of AV, Village Center District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Kenneth McNeil. 3. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use 1 ~- ~i permit to allow the operation of a contractor's storage yard located at 7210 Franklin Road in the Cave Spring Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Compre- hensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1-456 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. 4. That the Board hereby grants a Special Use Permit to Kenneth McNeil to allow the operation of a contractor's storage yard located at 7210 Franklin Road in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. 5. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Parcel I BEGINNING at a point on the southeasterly side of U. S. Route 220 (Franklin Road, S.W.), said point being corner to the property of Garland H. Overfelt (Deed Book 1024, page 68); thence with said Route 220, N. 38° 25' E. 157.88 feet to an old iron pin, corner to property of Claude Eggleston, et us (Deed Book 1085, page 445); thence leaving said Route 220, and with the line of Eggleston, S. 60° 56' 50" E. 340.64 feet to a point on the line of property of David W. Milam (Deed Book 1242, page 918); thence with the same, S. 29° 24' W. 264.05 feet to an old iron pin at fence corner, on the line of property of Robert M. Overfelt (Deed Book 1301, page 455); thence with the same, and with property of the aforesaid Garland H. Overfelt, N. 44° 24' S0" W. 380.46 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING, and containing 1.72 acres, as shown on survey for Kenneth W. McNeil, dated March 7, 1990, prepared by Jack G. Bess, Certified Land Surveyor, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof; and further known as Official Tax No. 114.00-1-12; and BEING the same property conveyed unto the grantors herein by deed dated July 14, 1977, from Myrtle T. Arrington, widow, of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 1070, page 167. Parcel II BEGINNING at a point located at the southwest intersection of U. S. Route 220 (Franklin Road) and Virginia Secondary Route 900 (Wilson Road); thence with 2 7= 2 said Route 900 S. 24° 16' 05" E. 354.61 feet to a point on line of property of David W. Milam (Deed Book 1242, page 918); thence with the same, S. 29° 24' W. passing an old iron pin on line at 1.88 feet a total distance of 7.45 feet to a point, being corner to the property of Claude Eggleston, et ux (Deed Book 1070, page 167); thence with the same, N. 60 ° 56' 50" W. 340.64 feet to an old iron pin located on the southeasterly side of Route 220; thence with the same, N. 38° 15' E. 94.65 feet to a concrete monument; thence N. 47° 10' E. 132.4 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING, and containing 0.90 acres as shown on survey for Kenneth W. McNeil, dated March 7, 1990, prepared by Jack G. Bess, Certified Land Surveyor; and further known as Official Tax No. 114.00-1-11; and BEING the same property conveyed unto the grantors herein by deed dated July 7, 1977, from Charles David Rother, et ux, et al, of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 1085, page 445. 6. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. mcneil 3 1 -3 AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COIINTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TIIESDAY, MAY 23, 1995 ORDINANCE 52395-16 GRANTING A SPECIAL IISE PERMIT TO THE SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANORE COIINTY TO EXPAND GLENVAR HIGH SCHOOL AT 4549 MALIIS DRIVE (TAX PARCELS 54.02-4-1, 2, 3), CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, the School Board of Roanoke County has filed a petition to allow the expansion of Glenvar High School at 4549 Malus Drive in the Catawba Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on May 2, 1995; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on April 25, 1995; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on May 23, 1995. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to allow the expansion of Glenvar High School located at 4549 Malus Drive in the Catawba Magisterial District is substan- tially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1-456 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. 2. That the Board hereby grants a Special Use Permit to the School Board of Roanoke County to allow the expansion of Glenvar High School located at 4549 Malus Drive in the Catawba Magisterial District. 1 i~ On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~v` Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Dr. Deanna Gordon, School Superintendent 2 I. ~r ~~ ~~ ~ _` ~, '1 p, _•..• ~- .~ rr •. r ' `J' ~s • ~ . ;, . L f .. .. aisr arr -~ ~. r .. Y _ . . .~ '~ .. ^.:L ~~ - . ~+ .. ~_ r ' ~c' .: _, _ , ,. • _ ~.. ^•',r a:sr }..fix - ~:-i-_.. «;. - ~ _ - - -~ ~. yr S~ w ,~ w wr' 'Ir ~~~• / 3 i • ]l ~ ~ .. •Vr p ••~~ ~ +- •~ II • ~eti~r1. ~~ I ~ rw 1 ww '• / ~ ~ r ~ r - ..-' ~~ ; ~ ~zur ~ ..e %r • l Y• ~ S .er \ ~ ~ 4 arro ~ s~ ~e'~ d •~ \ ~ u ~. ate...' au., •~ ~~ ' t `~. ~.° ms`s y ~ __ ~/ ` . •. •mr ar • .~ . rp ~ e ~M `. ~ ~. ; ~1 W r .+s : •'f ~ ~{~ i O =.. r r '~ ~ r~ - r ~..r - • 'y . r~ `I : ~ Z • ~ • r\ I ~~. r r r ~ -~ • .... arro t - ...~rr ` '1~ ..+ A ttf ~ u~ior ~`_ R ,~~_ r i ~ // ~~~?. ._+;~; s= - . 5::: ms's r.,-:: •+ SCHOOL BOARD - GLENVAR HIGH SCHOOL _ DEPARTMENT OF PLANNII~IG AND ZpH~ TAX MAP # 54.02-4-t, -2, -3 '. ~ ,~ . ~~ ~ ~ n '. W ly 1100 (5'~ I - Y_ _ __ ,; i ~ =3 .~ PETITIONER: SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE COUNTY CASE NUMBER: 14-5/95 Planning Commission Hearing Date: May 2, 1995 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: May 23, 1995 A. REQUEST Petition of School Board of Roanoke County for a Special Use Permit to expand Glenvar High School, located at 4549 Malus Drive, Catawba Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Commission wanted to know if the existing trees separating the residences from the school will remain and asked that this be encouraged during site plan review. Staff said there will be minor cutting. Jack Ellinwood, an engineer with Balzer, presented the request and responded to the issue of the trees. He stated that approximately 300 feet of the rear property lines will remain undisturbed. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS None. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Ms. Hooker said the school expansion is definitely needed and moved to recommend approval of the petition. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Ross, Thomason, Hooker, Witt, Robinson NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map Staff Report _ Other Terrance Ha ton, Secr ry Roanoke Co my Planni Commission ' STAFF REPORT PETITIONER: Roanoke County School Board CASE NUMBER: 14-5/95 PART I A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY B. DESCRIPTION PREPARED BY: David Holladay DATE: 5/2/95 ~~ This request is to build a 41,000 square foot addition to Glenvar High School. This proposed addition is for classrooms and office space to accommodate the existing student population and administrative and teaching staff. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Site plan review is required. There are no additional Use and Design Standards that apply to this request. • PART II A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Location -The site is located off of Malus Drive in the Catawba Magisterial District. To~ographv/ -The majority of the proposed construction area is relatively flat and contains a tennis court which is to be removed. The northwestern corner of the construction area slopes up to the west and will require some grading. Surroundin Neighborhood -All adjoining property is zoned R1 with single family residential land use, with the exception of one tract zoned AG3, which adjoins at one property corner along the northwest boundary of the school property. • ' B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site I-avout/Architecture -The proposed two story addition will be 27,948 square feet on the first floor and 13,271 square feet on the second floor. Fifty-two new parking spaces, including two handicap spaces, will be provided on the east side of the addition. Architectural plan are yet to be submitted. ~~ Access -The existing access is from Malus Drive, which is the entrance to the Glenvar High School/Elementary School property. Traffic Generation/Circulation - No impacts. Fire Rescue/Utilities -Public services exist on site. Fire and Rescue services will not be affected. C. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This request conforms with the Development land use designation of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. Policy D-7 encourages "necessary institutional support uses" such as schools, parks, and recreational facilities. D. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD Educational facilities are allowed by special use permit in the R1 zoning district. No additional Use and Design Standards apply to this proposal. PART III STAFF CONCLUSIONS This request conforms with both the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed development is necessary to meet the current and future needs for expansion of the public school system. Staff does not anticipate any negative impacts from this request. Staff does not recommend any conditions. PREPARED BY: DAVID HOLLADAY DATE: MAY 2, 1995 ~~ - - ~ ~' A N 'S' ~• ~ z i • '~ 38 • Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. as v ros v ws v x Consultation x 8 1 /2" x 11 " concept plan x Application fee x Application x ''. ,. Metes and bounds description / '' Proffers, if applicable x Justification x Water and sewer application x Adjoining property owners COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (7031 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 For staff use only / --.', date rec~ve :_/~~ `"'l1 received by~ a lication fee: p.GO ?CiBZ,4 ~' placards ' s 305 date: Case Number: ~~ Check type of application filed (check all that apply): D REZONING ®SPECIAL USE ~ VARIANCE Applicant's name: School Board of Roanoke County Phone: 562-3700 Address: 5937 Cove Road, N.W. , Roanoke, Virginia Zip Code: 24019 Owner's name: School Board of Roanoke County Phone: 562-3700 Address: 5937 Cove Road, N.td. , Roanoke, Virginia Zip Code: 24019 Location of property: Tax Map Number: 54.02-4-1, 2, 3 4549 M l D i a us r ve Salem, Virginia 24153 Magisterial District: Catawba Community Planning Area: G.Ita.i~e- Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: R-1 93.6 acres 4,194, 828 sq.ft. Existing Land Use: Glenvar High School -~-~' Proposed Zoning: No Change - R-1 Proposed Land Use: No Change -High School ........................... For Staff Use On/y Use Type: .. Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES xxx NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES xx.Y NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. ' If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO xxx ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::i:ii:i::iii:i::::is::i:::isi:::::;:i:;:::::i:::i::::::::::::isisi;isisi::i::::::isi;isisi;:::::::;:i:::::;::::::::::::::::::::::::: Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: • /hereby certify that l am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and~onsent of the owner. Owner's Signature: G.r Craff //..e n..L.. r___ .r..-~ . _. _._.. .,.... .....~. ..aac ~.u~nucr ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ........~:~I..f~~.~£3~t.F.~~`t7Rl~~r :flip 5~.~~~A~:~S~€ ... ~ .:::. .:.: . ;p~~`~.1~: Ff2#~~T ::::::::::::::::::.:.:.:::::::. Applicant _ School Board of Roanoke County - ~ 3 • The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. This Project involves the much needed expansion of one of Roanoke County's Public High Schools. The 41,000± square foot addition at Glenvar High School further facilitates the need for adequate school space and will provide ample area for various classrooms and offices. This addition also facilitates the creation of a convenient, attractive and harmonious community. The school use on this parcel has existed for some .time and the proposed expansion follows directly the purpose of both the zoning ordinance and R-1 Zoning District. • Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. The planned expansion of Glenvar High School correlates directly to the growth initiatives planned for the area, also accommodating the percent of growth anticipated. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. ~e existing parcel that contains Glenvar High School and its associrited amenities are contained within a 93.6 acre site. The existing building area on-site covers approximately 85,000 square feet with the approximate 27,000 square foot addition, total building coverage will be at 2.6t acres. The building is situated in the southern portion of the property. This location is an area that will have minimal, if any, impact on surrounding properties. Water and sewer facilities e.~cist on-site and access is on existing public roads. / / i ~ ' ,t / / . •. / / / / ' / /. ~ ~ j / / \/ /~ / r~ - 1 / / ' / / / / --- ~• 1 1 ~ / / ~ / / ~ ~ % ~ rf III ~- -~ ` L it 1 r / / ~~' / / / r I ~ {~ ____ ~//r I l / / / r/ ~~ / / /" .~~ ' \ / //1 1 / l / // / ' ~ j / ~ ~ _~_ I f i 1 1 r / / ~, /~~i r' ~ ~ - - ~ i I 1 1 t ~ ~~ 1 ~ / I r 1 ~ notsEO ~/~ 3 ~ f ~'y / ~ I ~ / 1 J I wlrEPuN ' ¢ / ~ t • % / I 1 111 - f~a / 1~ r f ~ r I I I +~ r r J // ~ \ ••~' / 1~~ ~/ / ,. fy / / r / ~ / ~' ~ ~, h -I / / r ~ _ l i ~ ~ ~ i / I' ~ / ~ ~/ // / ~ fI 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ ' ~ /~ Mar s_•tve~ - ~/:Y 1 re i' nancC 'r r ~ ' - ^~_ ' / // ~' / / %/ '' , 7 ca~o^/ tort . _ ~.I /' I ' ~ ~ r '' / i 1 i I ~I ..~: J•~ i / /.V Jo pMe K' RIM•flJf 'p E • /_ /~~l r ' , 1 ~. ~_ - _ - / / r / / ~ twecr•fttL5t7 '~- / / IZ~i°' ~ ~ j/ - i.~ C.:.,Y`f t•.{E 3 Q'r.X. of :\. ~ 1 1 - _ ~ _„ . -----"..~'_~ ~ _ ~.• a / ~ r ~ ~'d• •:~ ~ _ rte ~/ r 5y ~ ``'~_ ,,,~~. ~ ~......_~ .. ; 3~ ~ .. r. Reun+ree r / F I ~ ~ 1 \ \ eft 1. i ' ~ ~~ ~', r •. ,~ "t (.ue Cadw6 /F FlysBtf~ '~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ • r ,N.aea. ~...c•aY.iSCrrau rmvir I + y.~ B • PROPOSED 1MPROYEMENTS ~p ` soc:{.res Inc .. '~~~ GL FNVAR fflC!-~ SCNDOL GLEJ~IVAR YIR~INI~ ~c~..~CTIn.GTpti~dara.^.w ,.. KI~ ~C.tTi~ _ ~ '~; '- ~:: ~ ~ ~. 1 •~ ~% 1 cF-bK~ __ - ~ --ice i~ '~•• ~ _-~ • part'=. .~ _.lC• ._ .:_•;- ______~'•.~~-~~ ``,+ ). Doty /1~ <~ ~/' _ ,~ ., ~` 1 ' j~ ,i ~''~----- Q/i \ q . j, ~ ~ = -- a ~~ ~~~ -_~i • % ~' ~ I.- 1 ~A'R /~' ~ . ~ yY `~~ ~ y~e ~: ~:; :, ~ :\~c w> i1 S _ ".r. - h~ _ RCCic ~r sC' ~ '`~~ ..~ ~NV~ri ~~~ ~ \ t. ~ ~ s~y_ ~~~ F SI a^ P --r~- ''~i*A:yy~°. _ ~c cii..7~ ' -?~' ~ v.~.,.RC yr+,` yII '" _ sa~s ~ ~Y `!~ ~•a S ~ S ~~ ~~r ~Si OUSTR111 ~~ / T~f7 ~S` x G • Rei [ s~:~ ~ roe N c I 7 7 ~,~v ~° I,. • t Q c2~ iµw,p~a.. a ~Zt TCM~i.•. a ~~~_~__.~y,~~ M- ~Q . ffp sj~~.. ~ ~fp Sp~~ ..' .'.D a ~F's~x~Jd'9, ir7eY'` y:L_v :r[ ~ ~ RQ~~•~ ~ 4`.. ~~~~~:`?~ arc+n~tia ~,. c ago ~. ~' ,~Mr ":.:. ~~ NORTH VICINITY MAP;,,q;~ :~ ~ ,,;;~TR~ -~c -- - --------- -- ~ ~~ .._: ..c~ ~ . q '• I ~ °~ t.. r., uoo y ..~ I r " ,, ' ., \ ~' ~.! D Y 'a . c•, rss' w ,~ _ ~ b ' •Y ~ .~ \ r j•• q1 ' ~~ ,•~ ~ • a0~0`r ti ~ ~~ ~ i\\\ , .. aa, W /.Nro ' y 9 4 arro , .. _ L_~ I is ~~ _ 1 - -.. ~ \ ~. ' .y.I rJ~~ t... . , awr ~ - _ JR ~ y .. , t .: .. =.P ~~ • ~ ~ asst fin: `i ~ ya 2 .. ~ . ; .' wn .na t• >a a ~' v .r.. ~ m .ra_i .! \ fir, ~~yo b : Y i f ;•" ~ ..~ I '10 •y~ - r: ~ .: ~ a"' tai. ~ . \ a. ~ ~ J y x \ `~ ~ ~ ~ ~u-. ~ ! u ~ a~ ~~ - /~/ ~~ fl ~, Witt - ~ T • _ ~ ~ ~~ -,• SCHOOL BOARD - GLENVAR HIGH SCHOOL DEPARZTg.NI' OF PLANNIArG AND ZONING ~ TAX MAP # 54.02-4-1, -2, -3 / '~ 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 23, 1995 ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO THE SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANORE COUNTY TO EXPAND GLENVAR HIGH SCHOOL AT 4549 MALUS DRIVE (TAX PARCELS 54.02-4-1, 2, 3), CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, the School Board of Roanoke County has filed a petition to allow the expansion of Glenvar High School at 4549 Malus Drive in the Catawba Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on May 2, 1995; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on April 25, 1995; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on May 23, 1995. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to allow the expansion of Glenvar High School located at 4549 Malus Drive in the Catawba Magisterial District is substan- tially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1-456 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and hereby grants a Special Use Permit to the School Board of Roanoke County to allow said use. glenvar 1 .~ AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MAY 23, 1995 ORDINANCE 52395-17 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 1.9 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 3326 WEST MAIN STREET (TA% MAP NO. 55.03-1-2) IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DZSTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF I-2, CONDITIONAL, UPON THE APPLICATION OF JERRY MULLINS. WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on April 25, 1995, and the second reading and public hearing were held May 23, 1995; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on May 2, 1995; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 1.9 acres, as described herein, and located at 3326 West Main Street (Tax Map Number 55.03-1-2) in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of C-1, Office District to the zoning classification of I-2, Industrial District, Conditional. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Jerry Mullins. 3. That the owners voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions: (1) No work-in-progress material, scrap, or storage of 1 product will be visible from U. S. 460. (2) The property will not be used for major automobile repair services, meatpacking, and related industries, recycling centers and stations, scrap and salvage services. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at an old pin situate on the south side of Lee Highway (U.S. Route it and 460) which is 80 feet side; thence with the line of property now or formerly owned by William R. and Roseanne C. Brown and a fence line S 14 deg. 36' 48" East 233.20 feet to an old pin; thence the following four calls with tract "B". Fort Lewis Industrial Park, Plat Book 9, page 402, S 70 deg. 12' 45" W. 19.05 feet to an old pin; S 17 deg. O1' 20" E. 34.83 feet to an old pin; S 57 deg. 56' 46" W 106.96 feet to an old pin and S 67 deg. 44' 48" W 149.29 feet to an old pin situate on a fence line and also on the line of Lot 25, Fort Lewis Estates, Plat Book 3 , page 51; thence with the East line of Lot 25 and Lot 1, Fort Lewis Estates, N 14 deg. 24' 12" W 347.56 feet to a fence post situate on the south side of U. S. Route 11 and 460; thence with the south side of U. S. Route 11 and 460 N 80 deg. 56' 58" E 267.50 feet to the point of BEGINNING, containing 1.897 acres, as shown on a plat of survey for Joseph C. Thomas made by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers and Surveyors, dated April 13, 1989, a copy of which is recorded in the Circuit Court Clerk's Office of the County of Roanoke, Virginia in Deed Book 1307, page 239. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix 2 NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~• ~ Mary H. A len, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 3 T-~ D NORTH ~- Iy~- ~ ` 'rt ~'. ~ n y ~ tvA ~'t '~' -'tr . \ ,. r~+~~^ tt ` ~~3t ~ " r { • =1 L39Ac a `} •a ~~ . i • \ N.'w ~ s L •t \ ~ ~ ~ tsar ~r.' - ~ . 6 *% Gt- ~ ~ ° O ~~ . 'y'am % \ '~ ~ . s ~ x'' s n ~i+. r T.:' -~ p - ..°• ,a J1!! 7±, y ~ \ y i \ ,•r "t ~ NN \ ~ i0 • tw•, t C ~ [ '6 ~~ «I! ~• ~+• ~'~ t ~ ~ ' ~ \• 11 • ~ ,.t s~ iii >jl~i Jl~l C Jts",/ MI ;~~ ~ ~! s \ ~ St . j'~ \ ~ ~ : "_ M~ ` s/n \ twr ~. ~ * a 13 '. ~•~}S ~ 3d.~1! maw • C • w,rl t ~ ,S ~. t ° ; y ~ ~1.04Ac 38 4.92Ae ~~. t • ~"' •' " "„ J ' l!f ~ N 3Osrw s Jt4s „ L4SAC I•r. cwe lwsw s ~ - ~ ,t " t S%'~ ~ r~:r ~ .tom ~ ~ ~ ` ~' ~ 36~ 3T % 39. ~ b`T I ~~~ ` ~ "'rte , ;\~\ i~ , ~ ai ~~ ~ Z~IJ3• ~t, - \ - Mai I ~ ~ \ \ y~ `!\ ~,\'. ` s+~ N ~ f JNt \• ,rte` M '~ ~ ~; `~'©'~ ~ „". ~ •~ 9 8jist I.OIAcIDI 1.2 AC i \ 112At IG1 °~~ `" \, ~ I I' ~ ~-sJt~ n *J~ 14 ~` ~ ~ .t„ 6 " 3 3'~ - i~ G IV 10.1 r`' 218Ae J~~O \ e ~y~W ~ l "- .129 Ae ~ ~ I.OAe ~•~ *~\~-..- - ~ Jets X13.1 rl , ~.. ~ Z II T s ,~ ~~~~ ./12 11 ~ / 4.T3Ae • '2.96AC : ,• r C/~~ 2T ~) ~ ~>~ s •+ ( ~ 2.OOAc sJ/o 8 r 3.06Ac ` + 3.48Ae ~ ~ ~/ 7.94 Ae .~ is 24 25 t6sAe 4.94Ae tDl i ' S.20Ae 1~1. ~ ~~ ~~ Jsl~ ~~99Ac 1 / 10.9TAe / / ~ ~'` ~/ .~ DEPARZT~NT OF PLANNI1~rG _. - ._. AND ZONING .,, JERRY W, MULLINS TAX MAP # 55.03-1-2 r ~~~ PETITIONER: JERRY MULLINS CASE NUMBER: 15-5/95 Planning Commission Hearing Date: May 2, 1995 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: May 23, 1995 A. REQUEST Petition of Jerry Mullins to rezone approximately 1.9 acres from C-1 to I-2 to construct an office/sales/light manufacturing facility, located adjacent to 3326 West Main Street, Catawba Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION In response to questions from the Commission, staff cited several commercial uses permitted in the I-2 district; financial institutions, general offices, laboratories, major auto repair, etc. D. PROFFERED CONDTI'IONS 1) No work-in progress material, scrap, or storage of product will be visible from US 460. 2) The property will not be used for major automobile repair services, meatpacking and related industries, recycling centers and stations, scrap and salvage services. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Ms. Hooker moved to recommend approval of the petition with proffered conditions. The motion tamed with the following roll call vote: AYES: Ross, Thomason, Hooker, Witt, Robinson NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report _ Other Terrance Ha gton, ecr Roanoke C my Planning Commission STAFF REPORT PETITIONER: JERRY MUWNS CASE NUMBER: 15-5/95 A. EXECUTNE SUMMARY B. DESCRIPTION PREPARED BY: T1M BEARD DATE: MAY 2, 1995 PART I T- 5! Petition of Jerry Mullins to rezone approximately 1.9 acres from C-1 to I-2 to construct an office/sales/light manufacturing facility, located adjacent to 3326 West Main Street, Catawba Magisterial District. The petitioner's request initially involves a 4,800 sq.ft. building containing office and storage of metals for fabrication and metal parts. Potential future uses may include an additional 8,000 sq.ft. of industrial and commercial buildings in closer proximity to US 460. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS General offices, warehousing and distribution, and industry type I (metals fabrication or assembly) are permitted by right in I-2. No specific use and design standards apply under Article IV, Section 30-80. However, the complete range or ordinance regulations including and not limited to building setbacks, height, building and lot coverage, signage, exterior lighting, screening and buffering, and parking will be applied. A commercial entrance permit will be required by VDOT. Site development plans will be reviewed and approved by County staff before issuance of a building permit. • PART II A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDff10NS 2 T- Location -The subject site is situated immediately west of 3326 West Main Street. The property is in the Glenvar Community Planning Area and urban services are available. TopographyNegetation -Proposed site is flat to depth of ± 225 feet (south of US 460). The property drops sharply southward from that point to a natural drainageway bordering existing industrial land. The vacant tract is sparsely covered by field grass on its flat portion and mixed evergreen and deciduous growth on the steep rear slope. Surrounding Neighborhood -The applicant's property is zoned C-1. Vacant C-1 tracts lie north across US 460. A C-1 zoned single family home borders the owner's land on the west. To the south exists the I-2 zoned Fort Lewis Industrial Park. East of the site stand a C-2 zoned single family home and a restaurant. B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Layout/Architecture - Conceptually the petitioner has proposed one pre- • engineered metal warehouse with mansard roof connected to a mortar/brick east end. The building will contain approximately 3,200 sq.ft. of warehouse space and 1,600 sq.ft. of office area. The structure is projected to be two stories or 20 feet tall (office portion only). Final design could be of any type permitted by I-2 regulations. The building is proposed toward the rear portion of the site with parking slated directly in front and a loading dock in the far back. The combined proposed uses would necessitate 8-12 spaces including loading and handicap areas accounting for office activities and indoor storage/industrial uses. Access/Interior Circulation -The owner has proposed one entrance near the northwest property corner. One thouand feet of sight distance is estimated east and west of the proposed entrance. Turn lane(s) may be required (460 eastbound). Two-way traffic will follow the access road along the west boundary into/from the centrally located parking lot with trucks traveling to and from the rear loading area. The access aisle may vary from 18 feet to 20 feet widening to 30 feet at the entrance to US 460. Aisles actually serving parking spaces must be 24 feet wide. Screening and buffering (not indicated on the site plan) will include Type C along the east and west borders (15 foot-25 foot buffers with opaque fencing or small evergreen trees and shrubs). Traffic Generation/Circulation -The 1993 ADT on US 460 was 11,000 vehicles in this area. Two accidents were reported from 1990 to 1994. The 1994 ADT on McDaniel Drive was 522 vehicles. The 1994 ADT on Shawnee Drive (500 feet east of proposed site and the only access to Fort Lewis Industrial Park) was 146 vehicles. Neither secondary road had any reported accidents during the period 1990-1994. 3 Initially, traffic generation is anticipated in the 30-40 vehicle trip ends per day range. The County is seeking the widening of US 460 from 3 to 5 lanes. Parking ~ L~ • constructed in the future will have to be channeled to the one proposed access from 460. Fire Rescue/Utilities -Emergency vehicle travel time is estimated at less than four minutes. Both public water and sanitary sewer service are available to the site. C. CONFORMANCE WfTH COUNTY COMPREHENSNE PLAN The petitioner's site is designated Principal Industrial by the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. The designation encourages warehousing and light industrial uses, limits office activities and discourages retail development unless supportive of the area needs. Specifically the proposal complies with policies I-1 (maximize industrial development opportunities within Principal Industrial areas); I-3 (expand new industrial growth locations--particularly in the Glenvar industrial area); I-4 (provide adequate utility capacities to accommodate full industrial development in designated locations); I-5 (disperse industrial employment center locations throughout the County's urbanizing sectors); and I-13 (coordinate the industrial land use planning process with regional economic development agency programs). The proposal will be able to comply with policy I-9 (employ exceptional design measures to achieve compatibility with adjacent residential uses) with site plan modifications. D. CONFORMANCE WfTH COUNTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD • Site and buildin laps, erosion and sediment control and stormwater management 9P plans must be reviewed and approved. The proposal can comply with the zoning ordinance and its accompanying standards with modifications and additions (see reference to policy I-9 above in relation to screening and buffering). PART III STAFF CONCLUSIONS The applicant's request to construct an office/sales/warehousing/light industrial facility is generally consistent with the Principal Industrial designation of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. Minor traffic and land use impacts may be expected. t: OMMONWEALTH .KINETICS .rte. INCORPORATED t: k. _, / - --- -- VIBR~Z TION & NOISE CON~'ROL ; ~- ;. ... . May ~ 9, 1995 ~ ~ ''~. Ctounty of Roanoke ' fleet.. of Planning & Zoning ~ ~ , ,Rift».:. Mr Tim Beard f p'.O. ,Bax 29soo r Abanoke, VA 24018 ~~ ~~ :RE::Rexoning Request Case ,S~1S-5/95 `~ ~; . Dear Mr. Beard: ' This letter is my statement of record that I am offering tie ~ . fallowing proffer conditions to the request far rezoning as folloa-s: . , : . . • ~ ~ Y . ~ .. 1. No work-in progress material, scrap, or storage o~• :` ~ •, product will be visible frota U.S. 460. ~ ~' . , . `; .. ... 2. The property will not be used for major automobile ~.,~: repair services, meatpacking and related industries, ~` recycling centers and stations, scrap and salvage ~; services. ~: ~. _ A1so,~T would like to make a correction to the statement in•y4r staff :report at the top of page 3. The initial traffic movement. n. and out of the facility would be at a maximum of 10 trips. per. day ;~ with most of that being employee vehicles. Actual trunk del~:ver3~s would not exceed 1 per week at our current shop work level. Molt of .our actual "shop" work is on one--at--a-time projects that last between z to 3 weeks. This work may average 6 to s months p year. The balance of the time no actual shop work would Lace °~place. This is very low intensity use shop. ~ `' Tanks Por youx help. F " ' - ~ncerely, -----. ~' .. ~~~- ~ ! ~ Jerr • l~uk]. ns ~ ! ~: gip p.0. Box 908 + Salem, Virginia 24153 • (703 375-2640 • Fax (703) 375-2644 , .~ . , pP A i .R 0, ., i • i• COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 For staff use on/v date r c "v d: ceived by application fe /~ ~/ PC/BZA date• placards is ue BOS date: Case Number: C he~k type of application filed (check all.that apply): ~ 'LJ' REZONING ^ SPECIAL USE ^VARIANCE . Applicant's name: JERRY W. MULLINS Phone: (703) 375-2 Address: 7 0 31 SOUTHERLAND CIR . SALEM, VA Zip Code: 2 41 5 3 Owner's. name: SAME Phone: Address: Zip Code: Location of property: The 3400 Block Tax Map Number: .55.03 - 1 - 2 approx. 2000ft. west of Salem Magisterial District: CGf4~-6~ Limit on U.S. 460, described as Lot 2 on MAP 55.03(Block 1 Community Planning Area: GJen~uz Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: C-1 1 .9 acres Existing Land Use: VACANT LOT sq.ft. Proposed Zoning: I ~ ~e 2 For Staff Use Only Proposed Land Use: Use Type: Office/Sales/Very light manufacturing and storage warehouse. Does the p el meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the re sted district? YES NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. ~ ~ / If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES V NO ::_:: Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application completel Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. rvs v itrs v ~ ws v Consultation 8 1 /2" x 11 " concept plan Application fee Application Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable Justification Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners /hereby certify that / am eith the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser end am acting with the know/edp d consentgof~th/e~ owner~.~ Owner's Signature: (. L!/-7/~~/.l.G.~ _~ i /~ i40 For Staff Use On/y: Case Number / _y • Applicant Mr. Jerry W. Mullins The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-31 as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. See Attached Sheet Labeled Exhibit "A" • • Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. Since this property already lies in the PrimeIndustrial Land Use area, it is not a Transitional Area, is bordered on three sides by C-1, and the south border is an intense Industrial Park, we feel that our request conforms very well with the Land Use Comprehens- ive Plan. Our true. intent is only to allow us to legally perform a very low intensity indoor shop work. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. The net effect of this rezoning will not impact the surrounding area, adjacent properties, or the property itself in anyway that would be different from the building structure we could build under the C-1 current zoning. We are willing to offer a proffer condition that no work-in-progress material, scrap, or product storage would be visible from the road frontage of U.S. 460. ~=y • EXHIBIT "A" This property currently has no structure on it. Our intention for rezoning would not change the visual appearance of the structure we would build under cur- rent C-1 zoning. Our building is 1,600 sq/ft Office and 3,200 sq/ft Warehouse.(See sketch. No hazards or negative impact would be introduced that would not be introduced with any type of C-1 development. Our delima comes from the need to occasionally modify in some physical way.the standard products that we sell from the manufacturers we represent. We are not intending to be a manufacturing facility. Only occasional light shop work. Since this property has only abo area we can assure the community rial development is possible. In is intended to take advantage of type commercial development. Our as far as possible from the road ut 1.4 acres of usable that no runaway indust- fact, future development road frontage office/sales structure will~be set back frontage. We see this request and subsequent development as a needed addition to that part of the county. We feel that we meet M all of the intentions of Section 30.3 of the Zoning Ordinance. • I~ i• i• . I~ ? ti ;~ s'~ • ~; ~ ~~`, ~~ - ~ . ~ •~ _ : ~. ;, ~;: :; 1 \`\ i T ~ T ~''y~Y~ a ~_"~ k•/ t. ~6 `~ f 4 / ,'~ •~' v • ~ S ~ ~~ ~ Y . ~ •~'~- ~ / ~~ • • O / 'fir ~ s ~ d ~V ~~ I• C .~M yy ~: ~ 2B •, i ~ , mot. / \ .~ s ~ S! ? ~~ b ~~ is 4 ~' ~j mad, ~ b ~ . TO .yV ,` 1; '~0'Ir ~e ~ y / \ ~ ~ / ~ ~~ +° ~ / 'V ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ Aso • ~ ''~ ~~4 '~t-.r ~? 'b % ~ ~ ~y~~ / b by / d ~ /~'~O • ~ ~ 1 ~~'~c • ./'J/ / J ~ ` ~ / '~ / ~ /rte d V / ' ~+ / ~ ~~p .`•..: a ~ r~~ l ~ ~ t / ~ ~ / ~~ J !, ~ a +- / ('~ o /~ ~ /• • ~• \ \ c r /C -t c, ~ r~ ,~ r ~ ?~ ...,.,.~.: ~ ~ `. 9 1 0 . ~ ~ ~ i J9 ~`~ gyp: ~ ~4 ~~ ~ ~~ -~ ,, ~~ _,~, ~, ~ -X,:~ ~ ~ / ~` `~ ~, ,~ 0 J ~\O Z °~~~N \=~rl / / I / ~= y 2 M ~ .p ~ v W ~`~ Y V ~£~ N ~. 1 (~ I `v `\ V ~~ ~ P~fv \ ~ \\ ~\ \ O~A~f ~ \ '~ ` \ c ~ ~a ~ `~ ~ ~ m N t ~~ ? ~ 3 ~ C ~ \ J ~ ~ v \ d~ ~ • 3~0 ~0 V1 ~ g~ g ~ ~~ ~° ~~ 0 v Q i \- m ~ v w ~' N i• ~ .._ ~••% ~ ~~ ~~:•', ~/ - ~ ~~ r ~~ ~ ~~ o - ~:. ~ `^ Y ~ ~~lc ` 4 ° ~~n N .9 1` v1. J L•E'1~- ,(s ~~G Lr ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~~ ~q w ~~ ~_?~ 3 m vv p 2 a ~~ N Q a. N ro „ ~ ~ o~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ to +~ •'~ ro O •~, U 4-1 Ul ~ ''~ ~ • • +~ u~ +~ b" w ~ •~ r-I rob ro + Nrn U m c G rn ~ N S-i 3 N •.~ ~ t7' o Sa ~ N E x N o U +~+ +~ ~ a - N ro ro •~+ ~ 0,~~ ••o - Z m ro ~-1 +~N NOM- N l 01 •• C N N~ O r ~ ro.~•rl - NN E {~ O~ N N U N •~ ff1 N •rl 4„~ 'C1 3 ~ ~ u u > ++ O E •r-I •~ N tT •r1 '~ m o b~ ro ~ o ~ ~ a ' N ai a i i '-' E~+~•~o3x +~ o~ ° ~ 2 Are a -, ~~ S :~ (~~ ~ 1 rHE•~SUBJECT PROPERTY IS NOT WITHIN• THE -LIMITS OF THE 100 YEAR FLOOD BOUNDARY AS $~HOWN ... ON THE FEMA FLOOD BOUNDARY MAP. THIS DETERMINATION IS ~ASED ON THE FLOOD BOUNDARY MAP AND HA3 NOT .BEEN YERIFIED BY ACTUAL FIELD ELEYATIONS. n! Q~ 4 _ ~ g O a U.S. RTE I I 8{ 4~0 80' R/W F ~T N 80 ° S ~' S8. E ,... 2GZ.SO• w LL w a N cn. ~ ~- ~ .0. r ~ ~' ° ~ J ~_ o: d- ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ,.. i . ~ N J I ~ ~~ALTIi~` ~. ~~~ ~~ ~ RI~YMOND C. MfEEKS ~ Cert. Na o1.D .. p~-! Pi OQ W d m ~ ~~ ' ~~ ~o ~.Q~r~IJ 1' S~ °Q-a N , r -~ r `~ S Z ~~~' t4`~•2-g oP~u 5/r ~p P1v S''4~ TRACE~~" FORT LEWI`3 1 u~USTR1Al.. PARK FB.9, PG.202 IOW OR FORMERLY PROPERTY OF . SALEM READY MlX C01.lCRETE , 111C: . TAX -~ Sg .O Z. - 2 - t3 "~ 514. Co3' TO P 1.O lJ SHAWl~IEE pRiVE-'' . }- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n ~ 1.8q ~ ACRE w a o D.B.5~9 , PG 2.q`l } oC 0 ~ ~ os ~ :9 w a p ~.~ ~Q~J~ N - 0 3 to ~ ~ Ja~ ~ 0 3~ ~ Olp 1 ~ ~ LL Q FRM. SHED o ° r • ~ i• T~ 4 NORTH • '~.~. .. '~3'-' _ ,;,, 727 ! ~ .~ ~• s~ . r; . , ter` e ~ s ` a ~ ~. rc - u r L ati~ \ -• \ i~ \ /' ~ •~ a 'VII ~~ t • ~ f~~ ~¢ \ "+( ,' .•JFr„ \ ~'~ ~ S ~ An't \ am ~~ ,«r • j. * ~ •.7~,s ~ 35 +t ~....,• cwt G1 13 ~.. '.7~ ~ ~' .., i. t ~-- • ~ t ~ _ 4 s ~ y°°,. ~ s w•'1.04Ac 38 4.92 ~I/• • » ~~ \ . ~!~'.-, ..J!.1 "r ~S lI+S r 1.45Ac i.+ c..n ta..~... ~"•-af • ~~ •\ ~ rf' . N w ~• 30sa ~ .r 1+1 ?rr.+•,oa. s /ENO, ~ ;~' 1d T©~~wl„l~ 't^ \ ~.~ , ,/sa... • !1)'~ 7 J!/t \\ ~~,~ ~ .~ i..1•~ ~ J ~..~ ~' Y"_ 14 0 = ,, 9 L08Aeef 412Ae.~~ ~ 4 \ =.~. ~ ~ i ~--sJr~~ ~ N~ dpi ..~~ 6 S 3'•... .• •' ~~ • '~ I,~ G i 10.1 y.,r 218a< J,io ` • s rt46p ~ .~••-~•_ 123 Ae ~ s I.OAe Ran _ L ~ X13.1 ~ \ ~~ P _ _...- J+L+ •, 3 / I.OAc !~ Itl 10 2 ~~ ~„ 5 0 1 t\ ~ '~ ~~Z , 6 \ y g •: ° ~ `\ ~ .~ II • t 4.73Ac / /.' 3.91A/ ' 2.86 Ac S ~ +••' ~ r l...~ • 27 !SS' ~ ~ ~i .+ ~ + 3.481k .• ss 24 25 2.63AC S.94Ac lDl i ' i i 1 i ~ i ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~.~EN ~~ pJSE ~~ * DEPARTMENT OF PLANNIA'G _. - <_ AND ZONING ;? ,,. 2.o0ac S~ Jc!/ ~~99Ac JERRY W, MULLINS TAX MAP # 55.03-1-2 1.1 7.94 Ac I / 10.9 T 4c / / ~___,~ r-y AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MAY 23, 1995 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 1.9 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 3326 WEST MAIN STREET (TAX MAP NO. 55.03-1-2) IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF I-2, UPON THE APPLICATION OF JERRY MULLINS. WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on April 25, 1995, and the second reading and public hearing were held May 23, 1995; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on May 2, 1995; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 1.9 acres, as described herein, and located at 3326 West Main Street (Tax Map Number 55.03-1-2) in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of C-l, Office District to the zoning classification of I-2, Industrial District, Conditional. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Jerry Mullins. 3. That the owners voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions: (1) No work-in-progress material, scrap, or storage of 1 ~~ product will be visible from U. S. 460. (2) The property will not be used for major automobile repair services, meatpacking, and related industries, recycling centers and stations, scrap and salvage services. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at an old pin situate on the south side of Lee Highway (U.S. Route 11 and 460) which is 80 feet side; thence with the line of property now or formerly owned by William R. and Roseanne C. Brown and a fence line S 14 deg. 36' 48" East 233.20 feet to an old pin; thence the following four calls with tract "B". Fort Lewis Industrial Park, Plat Book 9, page 402, S 70 deg. 12' 45" W. 19.05 feet to an old pin; S 17 deg. O1' 20" E. 34.83 feet to an old pin; S 57 deg. 56' 46" W 106.96 feet to an old pin and S 67 deg. 44' 48" W 149.29 feet to an old pin situate on a fence line and also on the line of Lot 25, Fort Lewis Estates, Plat Book 3, page 51; thence with the East line of Lot 25 and Lot 1, Fort Lewis Estates, N 14 deg. 24' 12" W 347.56 feet to a fence post situate on the south side of U. S. Route 11 and 460; thence with the south side of U. S. Route 11 and 460 N 80 deg. 56' 58" E 267.50 feet to the point of BEGINNING, containing 1.897 acres, as shown on a plat of survey for Joseph C. Thomas made by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers and Surveyors, dated April 13, 1989, a copy of which is recorded in the Circuit Court Clerk's Office of the County of Roanoke, Virginia in Deed Book 1307, page 239. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. mullins 2 ~~ ,-- 5 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MAY 23, 1995 ORDINANCE 52395-18 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 1.23 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 123 JOHN RICHARDSON DRIVE (TA% MAP NO. 38.16-1-8) IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1 UPON THE APPLICATION OF THE ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on April 25, 1995, and the second reading and public hearing were held May 23, 1995; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on May 2, 1995; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 1.23 acre, as described herein, and located at 123 John Richardson Drive, (Tax Map Number 38.16-1-8) in the Hollins Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District, to the zoning classification of R-1, Low Density Residential District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of the Roanoke County Planning Commission. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a 45 inch white oak in the southerly side of the Hershberger Road (State Sec. Rte. 625) at the west 1 i~ end of an iron bridge over Carvins Creek, said beginning point being an original corner of the 45-acre tract, property of Julia B. Stone, thence along the original outside line of the aforesaid 45-acre tract and along the lines of the properties of O. D. Ross and A. W. Coon, running with the west and south bank of Carvins Creek the following four courses and distances: S. 10 deg. 00" E. 120.0 feet, S. 69 deg. 00' E. 167.0 feet, N. 57 deg. 00' E. 220.0 feet, and N. 87 deg. 00' E. 103.9 feet to a point; thence leaving the line of the property of A. W. Coon and along a new line through the Julia B. Stone property n. 25 deg. 38' W., crossing the center of Carvins Creek at 60 feet, passing an iron pipe on the north bank of the Creek by the fence at 112.8 feet, passing an iron pipe by a fence corner post on the southerly side of the road at 189.8 feet, in all a total distance of 206.5 feet to a point in the center of the Hershberger Road; thence with the same the following three courses and distances: S. 74 deg. 49' W. 66.7 feet; S. 65 deg. 31' W. 171.7 feet; S. 77 deg. 42' W. 155.4 feet crossing the steel bridge over Carvins Creek to a point in the center of the road at the westerly abutment of the bridge; thence S. 14 deg. 50' W. 11.7 feet to the Place of Beginning, containing 1.84 acres, being a southwesterly portion of the 45-acre tract conveyed to Julia B. Stone by deed of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, which is shown by plat made by C. B. Malcolm and David Dick, SCES, dated February 8, 1940. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: 2 Mary H. A len, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 3 ~i d C 1Ty or RoANO~<t ~_~ /~~ ,~ _ DEPARTi~1~t~p OF PLANNING RC PLAN. COMM. (ROSELAND OBENSHAIN) <_ . APID ~~ TAX ~{ 38.16-1-8 • , T-S .NORTH ., ~'- -.,~ PETITIONER: ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION CASE NUMBER: 19-5/95 Planning Commission Hearing Date: May 2, 1995 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: May 23, 1995 A. REQUEST Petition of Roanoke County Planning Commission to rezone approximately 1.23 acres from C-2 to R-1 to allow continued use as a single family residence, located 123 John Richardson Drive, Hollins Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION None. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS None. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Ross moved to recommend approval of the petition. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Ross, Thomason, Hooker, Witt, Robinson NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map Staff Report _ Other Terrance Ha on, Secr ry Roanoke Co ty Plannin Commission TS STAFF REPORT . PARTI Petition: Roanoke Co. Planning Commission File No.: 19-5/95 Prepared by: Jon Hartley Date prepared: 4/26/95 A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This is a proposal of the Roanoke County Planning Commission to rezone a 1.23 acre parcel occupied by a single family residence from C-2 to R-1 to facilitate favorable financing of the house for the continued care of the owner, who has been bedridden for a number of years. B. DESCRIPTION The Roanoke County Planning Commission, on behalf of Mrs. Rosalind Obenshain, proposes the rezoning of 123 John Richardson Road from C-2, General Commercial to R-1, Single-family Residential. The property contains 1.23 acres and is located in the Hollins Magisterial district. The property contains a single family residence which was constructed in 1942. The son is attempting to purchase the house to raise funds for Mrs. Obenshain's continued care but has been unable to secure favorable financing due to the commercial zoning. The property was rezoned from R-3 to C-2 when the comprehensive zoning revisions were adopted in 1992. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS With the current C-2 zoning asingle-family residence is not a permitted use and would be considered apre-existing non-conforming (grandfathered) use. Under Section 30- 23-2 of the Zoning Ordinance, anon-conforming use cannot be expanded or enlarged. It also loses its non-conforming status if it is discontinued for two or more years, changed to a conforming use, or the structure is damaged by any cause in excess of 50% of the replacement cost. Therefore, many lenders are reluctant to finance a non- conforming residence. As an existing residence, no other County or VDOT approvals are necessary. PART II A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Site Characteristics The property is located along Tinker Creek, with the property sloping downward from John Richardson Road to the creek. It is occupied by a single- family residence constructed in 1942, along with three outbuildings. The 1.23 acre parcel is landscaped, with portions in brush and woods. • "7 _ Jr-. Surrounding Area Immediately west of the property is another single-family residence that is zoned R-3. The adjoining property to the east and across John Richardson Road is presently vacant, but is zoned C-2 and is being developed as an office facility. Further east on John Richardson Road is the Harshberger House, one of three properties in the County listed on the National Register of Historic Places. On a broader perspective, the area to the south and west is single-family residential, while to the north and east the uses are a combination of commercial, industrial and multi- family residential. Flood Plain Issues Being located along Tinker Creek, much of the property is located within the federally designated 100 year floodplain, with portions in the more restricted floodway. According to the owner, the house received some flood damage in 1985 primarily due to the obstructions by debris at the bridge over John Richardson Road. B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Proposed Use The use of the property is not proposed or expected to change. The son, who currently resides on the property, is attempting to purchase the house to raise funds for the continued care of Mrs. Obenshain, who has been bedridden for a number of years. Surrounding Area This proposal should have no affect on the surrounding property and should not hinder in any way the development of the commercial areas to-the north and east. C. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The property is designated in the Surface Water & Flood Hazard designation with no specific policies applicable to this proposal. The area to the north and east is located in the Core land use designation. PART III STAFF CONCLUSIONS The property in question was zoned C-2 during the Comprehensive Zoning Map revisions which occurred at the end of 1992. During that process the area around this parcel was zoned C-2 based on the Comprehensive Plan and the prevailing uses, with the exception of the Harshberger House which was zoned R-1. However, at the same time, there was an attempt by the Commission and staff to avoid placing residences in districts where they were not permitted by right. Rezoning this property to R-1 would be consistent with that practice. • ' l~~ u Ch ck type of application filed (check all that apply): REZONING ^ SPECIAL USE ^ VARIANCE Applicant's name: ~pcLv-O~+Y. Cotrn't'~ -PlDanhirLQ (ao'mmi'~~jo-~vt. Phone: Address: t Zip Code: Owner's name: -~1ry• ~O!~e- I S. G ~G-'~bh4 in Phone: Address: l a'Z 3 Sohn ~Z-G~'1Ail.G ~ ~o0.a Zip Code: ~2oarno 1~,~ tl~ rq in;a Location of property: Tax Map Number: 3~.1(p " ~ ' S Magisterial District: ~-}p ~! -RS Community Planning Area: ~G~'t_TS CTC.G~ Size of parcel (s): o~ acres sq.ft. Existing Zoning: C ~ a Existing Land Use: `J-r~1~ ~Ct.m~~~ ~Z/s-~fit~G • . . .... . Proposed Zoning: ~,"~ Proposed Land Use: 5lrlo~~t; 'Fgyy~-~~ ~5~v~[.°L. 'For•Staff Use .On/y . Use Type: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES / NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES ~~ NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO _~ ........................................ ........ ................................ Y 9 Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke Count Zonin Ordinance in order to: COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 For staff use on/y / - date r~ ived: ~ received by: appfication_fee: PCiBZA datey 4~ / placards issued: BOS date: ~ ~ /~ / Case Number: f~ Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v Consultation Application Justification ws v 8 1 /2" x 11 " concept plan n~.. Metes and bounds description ~ Water and sewer application ws v Application fee '` ~. Proffers, if applicable Adjoining property owners /hereby certify that / am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner. Owner's Signature: Foi Staff Use Only: Case Number `~-°" Applicant __ ~OCWb~, L•D'tJ?'1'~u ~~ mrw ~.PYnMt,~lG'Y1 The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. Sew a~q~ln,-eta ~~c.~r ~'~o-vim. I~larsln.u,l~ ~ ~ ~arr'-s MARCH 23, 1995 Marshall M. Harris MR. JONATHAN W. HARTLEY, A.I.C.P. COUNTY OF ROANOKE P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VA 24018-0798 DEAR JON: RE: TAX MAP PARCEL # 38.16-1-8 f - „~ ~_ PER OUR CONVERSATIONS, I WRITE ON BEHALF OF THE OBENSHAIN FAMILY TO REQUEST THAT THE SUBJECT PARCEL BE REZONED FROM C-2 TO R-1. THIS 1.23 ACRE PARCEL, IN THE NAME OF ROSELAND S. OBENSHAIN, IS THE HOME OF MR.& MRS. OBENSHAIN AND HAS BEEN FOR MANY YEARS. DUE TO THE DETERIORATING HEALTH OF MRS. OBENSHAIN, IT IS THE FAMILY'S DESIRE TO SELL-THIS PROPERTY TO PHIL OBENSHAIlV, WHO IS .THE SON OF THE OWNER, AND USE THE PROCEEDS FOR HER CARE. PHIL OBENSHAIN HAS OBTAINED FINANCING FOR THIS PURCHASE; HOWEVII2, THE LENDER WILL NOT MAKE THE IRAN UNLESS THE ZONING IS RETURNED TO PERMIT SINC~~E-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USE. THE PARCEL IN QUESTION WAS REZONED IN DECEMBER 1992, EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1993, AS PART OF THE NEW COUNTY-WIDE ZONING ADOPTION AND THE REC.~A.SSIFICATION OF SEVERAL NEARBY PARCELS. HAD THE OWNERS BEFTt AWARE OF ITS INCLUSION IN THE REZONING PROCESS AT THAT TIME, THE PARCEL MOST LIKELY WOULD HAVE BEEN EXEr')PTID FROM REZONING FOR OBVIOUS REASONS. THE OBE~ISHAINS HEREBY REQUE.S'T A REZONING OF THE PROPERTY TO R-1 ~ PERMIT CONTINUED SINGLE-FAMILY USE OF THE PROPERTY CONSISTENT WITH ITS LONG-TIME USE AND F~F!'tJRE INTENT- IONS. MMH/nunh N_GL /N ~AL Y 816 FRANKLIN ROAD, S.W. P.O. BOX 1482 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24007 703 344-6744 ~ ) 7 =5 • NORTH p C 1Ty or QoAn~/ol<t ~~..i'-~ •h _ DEPARTMENT OF PLANr1I1~1G RC PLAN. COMM. (ROSELAND OBENSHAIN) Arm zorriNC TAx # 38.16-1- 8 ,.. ~ / ~/ ~. (~~ ~~/ ~-~~ `f~ \ D ~ ~~Ci~ D / -~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MAY 23, 1995 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 1.23 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 123 JOHN RICHARDSON DRIVE (TAX MAP NO. 38.16- 1-8) IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1 UPON THE APPLICATION OF THE ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on April 25, 1995, and the second reading and public hearing were held May 23, 1995; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on May 2, 1995; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 1.23 acre, as described herein, and located at 123 John Richardson Drive, (Tax Map Number 38.16-1-8) in the Hollins Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District, to the zoning classification of R-1, Low Density Residential District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of the Roanoke County Planning Commission. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a 45 inch white oak in the southerly side of the Hershberger Road (State Sec. Rte. 625) at the west end of an iron bridge over Carvins Creek, said beginning 1 T- ~ point being an original corner of the 45-acre tract, property of Julia B. Stone, thence along the original outside line of the aforesaid 45-acre tract and along the lines of the properties of O. D. Ross and A. W. Coon, running with the west and south bank of Carvins Creek the following four courses and distances: S. 10 deg. 00" E. 120.0 feet, S. 69 deg. 00' E. 167.0 feet, N. 57 deg. 00' E. 220.0 feet, and N. 87 deg. 00' E. 103.9 feet to a point; thence leaving the line of the property of A. W. Coon and along a new line through the Julia B. Stone property n. 25 deg. 38' W., crossing the center of Carvins Creek at 60 feet, passing an iron pipe on the north bank of the Creek by the fence at 112.8 feet, passing an iron pipe by a fence corner post on the southerly side of the road at 189.8 feet, in all a total distance of 206.5 feet to a point in the center of the Hershberger Road; thence with the same the following three courses and distances: S. 74 deg. 49' W. 66.7 feet; S. 65 deg. 31' W. 171.7 feet; S. 77 deg. 42' W. 155.4 feet crossing the steel bridge over Carvins Creek to a point in the center of the road at the westerly abutment of the bridge; thence S. 14 deg. 50' W. 11.7 feet to the Place of Beginning, containing 1.84 acres, being a southwesterly portion of the 45-acre tract conveyed to Julia B. Stone by deed of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, which is shown by plat made by C. B. Malcolm and David Dick, SCES, dated February 8, 1940. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. plan.ob 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 23, 1995 ORDINANCE 52395-19 DENYING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO VIRGINIA TOWERS INC. TO CONSTRUCT A BROADCAST TOWER ATOP READ MOUNTAIN APPROXIMATELY .4 MILE NORTH OF SUMMIT RIDGE ROAD, (TAX PARCEL 39.00-1-1), HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DIS- TRICT WHEREAS, Virginia Towers Inc. has filed a petition to allow the construction of a broadcast tower atop Read Mountain approximately .4 mile north of Summit Ridge Road in the Hollins Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on May 2, 1995; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on January 24, 1995; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on May 23, 1995. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: On motion of Supervisor "?zx3 to deny the special use ........................... .......................... permit, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: Supervisors Kohinke, Eddy A COPY TESTE: ma~_ 9d . G2,~c.c~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 1 DISTRIBUTION: Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney FROM: Brenda Holton, Deputy Clerk DATE: July 24, 1995 SUBJECT: Ordinance 52395-19 Please substitute the attached ordinance for the copy of the ordinance previously sent to you after the May 23rd Board Meeting. The motion to deny the special use permit was made by Supervisor Johnson, and not Supervisor Eddy. Thanks. t~ ,- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TIIESDAY, MAY 23, 1995 ORDINANCE 52395-19 DENYING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO VIRGINIA TOWERS INC. TO CONSTRUCT A BROADCAST TOWER ATOP READ MOUNTAIN APPROBIMATELY .4 MILE NORTH OF SUMMIT RIDGE ROAD, (TA7C PARCEL 39.00-1-1), HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DIS- TRICT WHEREAS, Virginia Towers Inc. has filed a petition to allow the construction of a broadcast tower atop Read Mountain approximately .4 mile north of Summit Ridge Road in the Hollins Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on May 2, 1995; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on January 24, 1995; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on May 23, 1995. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: On motion of Supervisor Eddy to deny the special use permit, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: Supervisors Kohinke, Eddy A COPY TESTE: ~- Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 1 17 ~" ° srs I Ito : , O ~~i HGHTS. - ~, ~~° . ROANOKE CCj'UNTY /1 y`g *l600 621 v ~,• O G g ~naca E TERN S7A7T ~ ~ ~ rM~uurrow to ~t6 ~ /..~ \ rzooo _....._, `O~ =~~~`~`y ~-VICINITY MAP \~ T- to Q NORTH _ ~~ * DEPARTMENT OF PI,ANDiIIv~ VIRGINIA TOWERS "~ AND ZONING SPECIAL USE PERMIT r: ~u .' ., ~T'ETTTIONER: VIRGINIA TOWERS INC. CASE NUMBER: 3-2/95 Planning Commission Hearing Date: May 2, 1995 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: May 23, 1995 A. REQUEST Petition of Virginia Towers Inc. for a Special Use Permit to construct a broadcast tower atop Read Mountain approximately .4 mile north of Summit Ridge Road, Hollins Magisterial District. (CONT. FROM FEBRUARY) B. CITIZEN COMMENTS Alfred Durham, an adjoining property owner, expressed concern with what's being proposed and said that he has not seen any plans. Matilda Bradshaw, trustee of the Holland trust, stated that they will be working with the applicant to allow them to use their road. She said that she is concerned with protecting the beauty and integrity of Read Mountain and protecting the ridgelines. Dave Miller commented that he would like to keep the beauty of the mountain and ask for assurance that a fence will be installed. Ms. Goodlatte stated there will be a chain link fence installed as shown on the site plan. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION In response to questions from the Commission, Maryellen Goodlatte commented as follows: her client is purchasing the eight acre tract from the Crumpackers however only 0.18 acre of the tract will be used for the tower; not sure if the existing tower will be removed; it will be necessary to obtain a subdivision waiver; a fence will be installed around the tower. D. RECOMMENDED CONDI'T'IONS 1) The tower will not exceed 80 feet in height and will include no more than one 18-inch dish. 2) The Special Use Permit is for one tower only. 3) Access will be by way of the Andrews/Holland Trust property. 4) The sole source of power will be two generators fueled by propane and located within 50 feet of the tower. 5) Development shall be generally consistent with the site plan. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Ross moved to recommend approval of the request with the recommended conditions. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Ross, Thomason, Hooker, Witt, Robinson NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report _ Other ~_ Terrance Harri on, ecre Roanoke Co ty Plannin Commission . ' STAFF >tZEPORT PETITIONER: Virginia Towers, Inc. PREPARED BY: David Holladay CASE NUMBER: 3-2/95 DATE: 2/7/95 PART I A. EXECUTIVE SUNIlVIARY B. DESCRIPTION This is a petition of Virginia Towers, Inc. to obtain a Special Use Permit to erect a Broadcasting Tower. The site is located in the Hollins Magisterial District, along the southern ridgetop of Read Mountain, at an elevation of 2260' above mean sea level. The site is approximately 2600' southwest of the summit and 93' below the summit elevation of 2353'. Petitioner proposes to locate an 80' tower with a small transmitter housing on an 8.0 acre portion of the Crumpacker tract. As of this date, no subdivision of the proposed 8.0 acre tract has been approved or recorded. As proposed, the site has no frontage on a publicly owned and maintained street. In order to subdivide the 8.0 acre tract, a subdivision waiver for road frontage must be approved by the Planning Commission. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Broadcast towers are allowed by Special Use Permit in the AG3, AG1, AR, and C1 zoning districts, and are permitted by right in the C2, I1, and I2 zoning districts. In all cases, the towers are subject to use and design standards that set minimum setbacks from property lines and road rights-of--way; allow more than one tower provided all setbacks are met; prohibit lighting if not required by the FCC or FAA (other than essential security lighting); require notification of the airport manager if the site is within 2 miles of an airport or located at or above 2,000 feet above mean sea level; and require towers to comply with additional requirements in the Airport Overlay District and the Emergency Communications Overlay District. In addition, the height of the tower must be made a condition of the Special Use Permit. Site plan review will be required prior to issuing the building permit in order to ensure compliance with County ordinances. Entrance permit will be required by VDOT. PART Ii ~' ~ A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING COYDITIONS Location -The site is an 8.0 acre portion of the 236.94 acre Crum acker tract located along the P b center ridgeline of Read Mountain. The site is in the Bonsack Community Planning area, and urban services are not available. One tower currently exists on Read Mountain, but is no longer in service. The structure is approximately 60 - 65 feet tall, with a 10 - 15 foot antenna extending from the top platform. This existing structure is marked "Airway Beacon" on the U.S.G.S. Roanoke, VA 7.5 minute quadrangle map. Topo ra by/Ve etation -The ridgeline at the site is typical of other mountains surrounding the Roanoke Valley; a narrow ridge "saddle" with steep slopes on either side. The ridge contains some small rock outcroppings, but otherwise is covered with mature hardwood forest. The canopy height appears to be limited to 50 - 60 feet, with future growth stunted by the relatively harsh summit climate. Read Mountain is a distinctive landmark in the Roanoke Valley which stands out due to its geologic "separation" from surrounding mountain ranges. It is visible and easily identified from many areas in the valley, including the Stewart's Knob and Read Mountain Overlook areas of the Blue Ridge Parkway. The ridgeline has the appearance of being relatively pristine, even though asingle-track road leads to the top, and to a tower which is no longer in service. The "airway beacon" tower goes unnoticed because it is not much taller than the existing trees. Surroundin Neighborhood -The site and associated Crumpacker tract are zoned AG3. The 236.94 acre Crumpacker tract extends from the top of Read Mountain southeast down to the Orchards and LaBellvue subdivisions which are zoned R1. Two adjacent tracts to the southwest are zoned AG3. Adjacent property to the northwest, which slopes down the opposite side of the mountain from the Crumpacker tract, is zoned R1. Adjacent property to the northeast, which lies in Botetourt County, is zoned R1. B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Layout/Architecture - As of this date, no site plan has been submitted. A written description of the site, and vertical sketch of the tower, and a preliminary plat of the 8.0 acre site were submitted with the application. The applicant proposes to construct an 80 foot broadcast tower, with antennas attached to the side of the tower. One antenna, about 3 feet tall, will be placed on a platform below the top of the tower. The second antenna, about 2 1/2 feet tall, will be placed on a small platform at approximately tree height on the tower, housed in a small square structure alongside the tower. No dishes or other appendages will be present. The tower will be self supporting, and will not require any supporting wires. There will be a small outbuilding adjacent to the tower to house the transmitter. The proposed location of the tower within the 8.0 acre site is uncertain. Also uncertain is whether the applicant proposes to remove and replace the existing tower, or build in the vicinity of the existing tower. The extent of grading and vegetative clearing at the site has not been .provided with the application. The tower and transmitter will require electricity. A service transmission line is proposed from the Crumpacker property up to the site, but location of the line has not been determined. Access - An access road is planned on the east side of the mountain, along an old fire road/trail on the Crumpacker property. The engineers of the tower have indicated that only asingle-track road, capable of being driven by a four-wheel-drive truck, will be necessary for construction and routing service visits. The exact location and design of the service road have not been determined. Currently, asingle-track, private road through the Bradshaw property on the western slope leads from Old Mountain Road to the top of the mountain. This road was used in the past to service the "airway beacon" tower, but is not planned to be used as access to the proposed tower. Traffic Generation/Circulation - No employees will be stationed at the site. Traffic generated by occasional/routine visits by technical staff will not significantly impact adjoining public streets. `~" Amenities -FAA has determined that "obstruction markin and li h ' ~~ g g tang are not necessary . C. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The site is in the Rural Preserve land use designation of the Comprehensive Plan. This designation delineates outlying areas which are primarily undeveloped and stable. This designation encourages a high degree of protection to preserve existing agricultural, recreational and forestal resources, while permitting a limited, very low density residential settlement pattern. The petitioner's request is generally consistent with the policies of the Rural Preserve land use designation. The use of the site for a broadcast tower will not significantly threaten productive farms and woodlands. Impacts to vegetative cover and the visual landscape could be minimal or significant, depending on site design, extent of development of the access road, and location of the electric power service line. Not only should the incremental impact of this proposal be considered; but the cumulative impacts of this structure, plus other existing structures around the valley, and possible future structures should be considered. Read Mountain is identified in the Critical Slopes guidelines of the Comprehensive Plan, Resource Protection Guide. Within the 8.0 acre site proposed for development, only a small portion of the land at the top of the ridge is relatively flat. An access road from the Crumpacker property would likely cross critical slope areas. The following guidelines from the Resource Protection Guide address any development proposed for slopes which exceed 20%: Grading and cut-and-fill operations will be minimized. Natural land forms and vegetation will be preserved to the extent possible. ~~ - D. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNT' DEVRLOPMENT STANDARD The petitioner's request complies with the following zoning ordinance use and design standards for Broadcast Towers: -Maximum height of the tower has been established as 80 feet, and shall be made a condition of the special use permit. -The site is not within the Airport Overlay District or the Emergency Communications Overlay District clear zone. -The Federal Communications Commission (FCC), Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), and Roanoke Regional Airport Commission (BRAG) have been notified. These agencies have reached the following determinations: -Tower height will not impact the airport traffic. -Illumination is not required and thus is prohibited by the zoning ordinance. -Concern was raised by the RRAC about two FM broadcast frequencies which, if broadcast from the tower, could interfere with control tower communications. One of the frequencies in question has been addressed and will not be used. The other frequency is currently being evaluated by the FAA. The following use and design standards have not been addressed: -Setbacks from property lines. -Lack of public road fronta e for the ro osed subdivision. g P P L_J . ~ PART IIi STAFF CONCLUSIONS The petitioner's request to construct an 80 foot broadcast tower is generally consistent with the Rural Preserve designation of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. The use of the site for a broadcast tower will not significantly threaten productive farms and woodlands. Impacts to vegetative cover and the visual landscape could be minimal or significant, depending on site design, extent of development of the access road, and location of the electric power service line. Not only should the incremental impact of this proposal be considered; but the cumulative impacts of this structure, plus other existing structures around the valley, and possible future structures should be considered. Since the height of the tower must be made a condition of the Special Use Permit, staff recommends that a height of 80 feet be set for the tower. Due to lack of a concept site plan, uncertainties about potential impacts to vegetative cover and the visual landscape, staff suggests that the Planning Commission consider delaying a decision on this application until sufficient information is received about the following: site plans ~-proposed land disturbance -access road development -electric service line location -potential vegetative and visual impacts • PREPARED BY: DAVID IIOLLADAY DATE: FEBRUARY 7, 1995 • T GLENN, FLIPPIN, FELDIrZANN BC DAEHY • E00 YSRS2 CdD~H9T 1 3pTSAHL P032 OYPICB DOX P887 AOti*roHE, YIR(}I,7ZA 24001 (T03) 226-8000 P_SX (T03) P24-9060 MARYELLEN F. GooDLATIF. Direct Diel (703) 2248U1d April 27, 1995 SENT BY FACSIMII.E - 772-2108 Mr. David Holliday Roanoke County Department of Planning and Zoning 5204 Bernard Drive, S. W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Re: Application for Special Use Permit: Virginia Towers, Inc. Dear David A. s you know, we represent Virginia Towers, Inc., whose application is scheduled to be heard by the Planning Commission next Tuesday May 2. In my letter to you of April 4, I outlined how Virginia Towers addressed two of the three concerns voiced by the Planning Commission at its February 7 meeting. We had requested a continuance until May 2 in order to address the remaining issue, locating the utilities which will. provide power to the site. Virginia Towers worked with Appalachian Power Company and with private contractors to develop a plan for providing electric power to the tower site. The plans for that utility line were not satisfactory to Virginia Towers, in part because of the need to clear large sections of land to accommodate the line and its construction. In lieu of nlnning an electric utility line to its facility, Virginia Towers will locate two generators, fueled by propane, and ad,}acent to the transmitter building to serve its power needs. There will be no need to locate a utility line, whether underground or above ground, to provide power. We are pleased that this proposal, when coupled with Virginia Towers' use of an existing road for access to the site, will have a m;nimal impact on the view and the mountain. • ~-~ " GzE`-v, FLIPPY~, FELDiiANIV' & D ~xex Mr. David Holliday April 27, 1995 Page 2 We look forward to mceting with the Planning Commission on May 2. In the meantime, please let me know if we can provide any further information as the application of Virginia Towers is reviewed. very truly yours, Maryellen F. Goodlatte MFG:jry:3039000 cc: Virginia Towers, Inc. • • T- ~., GLENN, FLIPPIN, FELDMANN 8c DA1~BY 200 FIRST CA~SPBEZL SQUARE POST OFFICE BOX 2887 ROA~OXE, VIBGIIVIA 24001 (703) 224-8000 F_~..Y (703) 224-8030 MARYELLEN F. GOODLATTE Direct Dial (703) 224-8018 March 29, 1995 HAND DELIVERED Mr. David Holliday Roanoke County Department of Planning and Zoning Electric Road S. W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Re: Application for Special Use Permit: Virginia Towers, Inc. Dear David: It was a pleasure to speak with you today. As I advised you, we expect to appear before the Planning Commission on Tuesday, April 4. I have received from Graham Brock, Inc., Virginia Tower's broadcast technical consultants, three items in support of the request of Virginia Towers, Inc. for a special use permit. A revised Federal Aviation Administration Determination of No Hazard for the proposed tower is enclosed. This revision specifically includes the addition of 104.9 MHz at 2.5 kilowatts. Jeff Brock has advised that not only is the tower in accordance with FAA regulations, but there is no intermodulation potential in using 104.9 MHz at this site. Jeff has advised that this should remove any concerns the Airport Commission may have regarding Virginia Towers' proposal. Also enclosed is a drawing of the potential 80-foot tower provided to Graham Brock, Inc. by Electronics Research, a manufacturer of both towers and antennas. The diagram indicates the overall elevation scheme of the proposed tower as well as the general foundation notes for the tower base. As earlier noted, there will be no guy wires proposed for the tower. It will be aself-supporting structure. The top 20 feet of the structure will be only 12 inches in face diameter, which is significantly less than the existing airway beacon at the site. Finally, I am enclosing a preliminary site plan revolving around the tower and transmitter building at the proposed site. The drawing shows the actual tower base, • ~ / GLENN, FLIPPIN, FELDbI2.NN ~'' DAI3BY Mr. David Holliday • March 29, 1995 Page 2 the transmission line bridge running from the tower to the building and the building itself. In addition, the plan locates the subsurface foundation for the tower as well as the new emergency generator for the facility. The entire plant is enclosed by a fence for security purposes to keep people away from the site and the building. Representatives of Virginia Towers are meeting with Appalachian Power Company this Friday afternoon to review APCO's proposal for utilities to serve the site. Those utilities will be located underground. We expect to have a plat locating that line on Monday, April 3. As soon as I have received the same I will forward it to you. I also understand that Virginia Towers is negotiating with John Bradshaw for the use of his road as access to the tower site. As I am not involved in those negotiations, I do not know the status of the same, as of the sending of this letter. However, I will, advise you as soon as I am aware. Thank you very much for your assistance and cooperation. • Very truly yours, ~•-- Maryellen F. Goodlatte MFG:jry:3039000 Enclosures cc: Virginia Towers, Inc. SENT BY FACSIMILE - (804) 846-6409 Mr. Jefferson G. Brock SENT BY FACSIMILE - (912) 638-7722 Keith Putbrese, Esq. SENT BY FACSIMILE - (703) 827-9538 Mr. John Parker w/enc. SENT BY FACSIMILE - 389-5767 • - , ~"- lj ~~ uSDepe(1iT~ent i ~ N'-,~, ~ '~"~ "~~-~, ca grnRes:an ofTfanC~ Qnpn ~ :~ 3 ~k,~ ~~• FlSgeralaFeeeratBu:IC:nq ~~25'R1 ~VICliOn ~.~ ~'~':~! ;~ . i-i , ; :r::ernH:xinat a..~n Adminisirati :._~~ ~ ~ ,;;~ ~ - _ ,,....a...a. ,:a.. f~~R .:.~~ on ~ ' - ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF NOTICE OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION OR ALTERATION -------------------------------------------------------------------------- CITY STATE LATITUDE/LONGITUDE MSL AGL AMSL ROANOKE VA 37-20-06.49 079-54-15.14 2260 80 2340 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VIRGINIA TOWERS, INC. GRAHAM BROCK, INC. 10 SYLVAN DR., PO BOX 24466 ST. SIMONS ISLAND, GA 31522 Type Structure: ANTENNA TOWER AERONAUTICAL STUDY No: 94-AEA-1831-OE 946-952 MHZ;104.9MHZ @ 2.5KG1 ON);,Y The Federal Aviation Administration hereby acknowledges receipt of notice dated 08/12/94 concerning the existing construction or alteration contained herein. ' A study has been conducted under the authority of sections 307(A) and 313 (A) of the Federal Aviation Act to determine whether the existing structure would be an obstruction to air navigation, and/or whether it should be marked and lighted to enhance safety in air navigation. The findings of that study are as follows: The existing construction would not exceed FAA obstruction standards and would not be a hazard to air navigation. Obstruction marking and lighting are not necessary. If the structure is subject to the licensing authority of the FCC, .a copy of this acknowledgement will be sent to that Agency. NOTICE IS REQUIRED ANYTIME THE PROJECT IS ABANDONED OR THE PROPOSAL IS MODIFIED SIGNED /lcc/~.d ~/'ue..0 Specialist, Systems Management Branch ~ichara ~, Picore (710)553-1230/1220 ISSUED IN: Jamaica, New York ON 12/21/94 (~-~. ;rte ., :;• >.' ~- , :1.,`_ ~!'. •.\.~; r . F'~ `' .. C V i N <z U lu O W W • C C L. v C a L n •i a a c c ~ ~ ~ ~ x x x x fV N h N ~ ~ c c vi vi vi vi ® a a ~ ~ ~ Q~ N 9 N @ e 6• ~ :° H N I I O I O I O O Q tp cp N I I I O H ~ b W 0 N O C~~fV N ~ Q O L.! Z O<~ CZ I U O~ vWiC V~cvi ~ N ~ ~ W C OO 1 i C •CN v~ O 1 V~.~ ~ 22C0 "O ~ G ~-+` ` ~ W ~o N t~cn 1 N ~ W Z O O U ~ ~ U C _O ~ -- W O~ Q a Z ~ ~- W O ~ W F. L< . Svc `= ~ -'' ~ ZVNVfN ? c°2 o G G ~ ~< ~ W OTC W ~ C2~ `` .~ Z< < C~'- U N '~' C O O C O ~ ~~= h ~ U c a ~ ~ Zgt~' WotiUZ W2`n N B ~O 0. 2$ ~ ~ .~ < W W to U N ~ ~ E W W0D ~2~p1' O ~ `i'i V C 1 W WtWi~ L i CHUO V ~VZN p N ash l+-i > N ~QO 2 4Q NCOC ~ N C p2<~ W~'c U< W O< I ~ W~ -~'~ Jam'.'' ~.+ ip v .~ N ~ v h b • x(71 r-r W ~- ~ -r-r-I-1 L_L <'- J_1_1_LJ-J I I I C~~.,c I i I I I I o I I°<~ I I I I I I r-I- ~ -t r-,--r-t-~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r~- I -r I\1 ~-r-r~ LJ_T_L I J .1_1_LJ i l l l i l l l i l ~--r--I.-i_t-;-.a.-.~-~.~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r F--i- ~ -+--t--i--t-t-f-1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r-I- I -r-r~-7-r-r-i I 1 1 i I I I I i ,O-'~ .~ -~ ~L! I CI d C 0 ~-----~ ~-----~ I I i I r------~ I I ~---- ; ------ I I t------~ i i ~-----• I I -.° c~.~ C~~< Ziz ~ Cs - m O ~I~ a S ~zBFa rC piE+ ~iZ i L".ir7 ~ x„10 °° C'~ ~~~ ~ .F pIL-] ~ ° E'•~C='+ " ~' ~ ` K/ p y ~ C ~ ~ ti ~~o ~ ~ a" C r D O G C V V1 O ~ I ° ~ ~ I ~ s ~.~ . ~: e s oxr'~W~S o' £ ~ ~ >.s x Qx~ ~~fias~~~ ~x~~~;~~ ak~a~ SIC ., ~ ~ b _~~W=tQ ti a=°g~~53 ~g ~€ '~= s cg 5. c \L';6 ° .g;~s~ P ~ €- S 2.~ so ~rnOc7 O O O O C ~ ^ ~ r W v N N CG p Z O+ 01 U C N - n ~ m rb ~~ r~ O ~'? Q U £ ~! ~~41,r~ T ~ TOWER FOUNDATION (SUB-SURr=ACFa READ MOUNTAIN SITE PLAN THIS IS A PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN FOR THE PflOPOSED VIABINIA TOWERS, INC. SITE ON READ MOUNTAIN. 8CALE i/8' ~ i FOOT TRANSMITTER SITE PLAN VIRGINIA TOWERS, INC. READ MOUNTAIN ROANOKE, VIRGINIA March 1990 Gr~~ Brzocx, Itvc. BROADCAST TECHNICAL CONStJI.TANts FENCE AROUND PERIMETER OF SITE •' ~ / i Vim ' K m C y ' JZK Q~ F'~~~= 8 ` yX~W~ n N ,r O W ~ ~ ~ ~~~. i ~ ~~~~ N D 3 r ~-~~-- ~ ` ~y5. i LL ~.-- ! 1~~~ , / ~ '~ / `~rv. ~~~ ~~~- W ~ ~ w ~ per„ .___- ~ ' ~ i tie z ,~ , . ~- ~ ~ < W ~ ~ a $ L }OJ O I ~(~ P-, f / //I ~ , ~ ~ . •~ rte- ~ f" ~ /i- =-' 1 ''~~ ~ i ~,\ ~ ' ~ O,'J ~ ' ! ~ O Io rn 0 6 ~' F Z U ` i'__~ I / ! ,:. ~ ` ~~`~ \~~ ~ .\~ \ \+, rte- .~ i / 1 -0/ ~ , ~ ~ ~ + . ~ -tom - _. ~ ~ /~ / fJi' ~ ~ I o z.~~ rte'/ ~ ~;+\~ ~~•1~~~~~ . i `: i / ~ ! l ~~' .y ; , it 1 ~ ' .9,~ , \~~, C\\/ ~ / ~ ~ • \ \ ~~ d 1` j f '. z ~~ i +',\ ~~ ~" ~ ~ l to .~ ~ ~~ J., ,III J,~ ~~J J J !~~• ~ - ~,~ ,'~;i ~~~~( ,ti ~,~, ~~~ '';; . ~'~,-' ~~ 1 ti \~ _ 'I r• I ~ ~~ ~ it l /Q' ~ ! / ° //~ ~ ~ .i; ~,/ ~:~,I ~ I, /~ ~ • 1 ~ ~ ~~ ~ \ - 6ob1. Johnson, Chairman Kit B. Kiser, Vice Chairman W. Robert Herbert Claude N. Smith Arthur M. Whittaker, Sr. 5202 Aviation Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24012-1148 (703) 362-1999 FAX (703) 563-4838 ~- ~D L. Shuck, Executive Director VIA FACSIMILE and REGULAR MAIL Terrance Harrington, AICP Director of Planning Department of Planning and Zoning County of Roanoke P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 RE: Dear Mr. Harrington: January 11, 1995 r,~' ^~' ,- v ~~~ Lf:f, i ~ 1`ry3 ~J F3 .~~~ ~;~~~ ~z Z~~;r~c~, htt~tii~i:~1ir CCUtii'~l Rezoning Request Case No. 3-2/95 In response to your correspondence dated December 30, 1994, I request that no action be taken on the above referenced matter until the proper forms have been filed with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and a determination by the FAA has been received. In conjunction with this request, I am including a letter from the local FAA tower manager which specifically requests, pursuant to FAR Part 77, paragraph 13 (a) 4, that an FAA Form 7460-1 be filed with the Eastern Regional Office of the FAA. I thank you for offering the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission the opportunity to comment and hope that you will contact me if you require any further information. Very truly yours, Jacqueline L. Shuck Executive Director JLS:csp Attachments cc: John Hinkle Tower File csp011195.d Hazrington U.S. Department Federal Aviation Administration _ g X995 of Transportation pir Traffic Control Tower ~ AN Federal Aviation 163 5 Aviation Drive ~~,L;~ Administration Roanoke, Virginia 24012 703-362-1S66 January 06, 1995 Jacqueline Shuck, Director Roanoke Regional Airport Director's Office 5202 Aviation Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Dear Ms. Shuck: • Per our phone conversation of January 4, 1995, and the documents sent as information, Roanoke Tower understands that a proponent is petitioning Roanoke County for permission to construct an eighty-foot radio antenna on the top of Read Mountain. There is a possibility that this antenna could be under the VOR/DME-A approach to Roanoke Regional Airport. There is the possibility that it could impact the missed approach procedure for the LDA RWY 6 instrument approach. Also, the frequency of this antenna could interfere with FAA communication and/or navigation frequencies in proximity to Roanoke Regional Airport. Therefore, the FAA requests that Roanoke County ensure that the proponent has filed FAA Form 7460-1, Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration with the Eastern Regional Office. A copy of FAA Form 7460-1 is attached. FAR Part 77, paragraph 17b, defines time parameters for filing FAA Form 7460-1. This information is included on the instruction sheet of FAA Form 7460-1. The Eastern Regional Office advised that the average time for processing the Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration is sixty to ninety days. Many proponents think that because the site they are considering is more than 20,000 feet from the runway or that the construction is less than 200 feet high that filing FAA Form 7460-1 is not necessary. FAR Part 77, paragraph 13a (4), allows the FAA to request the filing of Form 7460-1 in unique situations. The Roanoke area is unique. Because of the mountainous terrain the final approach fixes for the Instrument Approach Procedures are as far as nine miles from the runways. This means that construction on places such as Poor Mountain could affect approach procedures and Minimum Vectoring Altitudes at Roanoke. T- lc~ -2- Roanoke Tower a reciates the efforts that the Roanoke Coun Commissions and the PP n' Roanoke Regional Airport make to help us protect the safety and the best interest of the users of our airport. If additional information is necessary, please contact our Plans and Procedures Specialist at 703-362-1866. Sincerely, tt~~v~,~ ~ ~ / John D. Hinkle HMW/dtb Enclosure • • i ' m °N `Z`~ . 7t~ O . , ' N~OW~ ~ n N ~o~'~~ ' ~ ' W ~ . ~~'_a o _ __ ' ~ w .. ~~' ~ ~• vvi o 3 ~ ~ ~ ~~- ryas - ! `-- .~ ~ Z q ~ cA J "--1~ v F-_ ~~j Y2 " 'ti o `' ~ ` ~ ` ~ ¢"~~ z ~ ~- ~ vox °' $ tip 2 p \ Y r l ~~; r -/-. \\~l~ , ~~~%i~ ~ N /^-\ 1 ~ _ {{ -n t ~I 1 / ~ ~ ~ / ~-~ ~6. , l~ f "t ~ /~ ~ i x ~ to f J ~ 1 t ~1 ~' /~- i'11j ~~~ ~ ~ m p l ~I s.--~ / /i~ll~ I f ..~_ / ~ z c~i tai '/ I~~ 1 \ ~ O. 1 ` ( /~/% /' ~ ~ ,", // ~ ,~,~t. ~\ -ter. ii` ^~~^ `,. ~ ~ , i;:' ~ ~~.\\`,` ~ ~G~ (%ry~/~ ^ ,car- ~~•~~%" ~ /~,' ` '~~ -_ ~'~~ :_ --•\. (\ 1~ ~ ; iH-J I~ ~ 1 i; ~ o Q , ~ ; ~ ~ ,/ ~y~~ } `';,\ ,...~`% i ~ to Z I/ `r///,, ~ 1 '? ,~, j ~- ~ ~~ ~~ •~ ` ~ .~ ,~ . / . __, ~ P ~~ Fcr staff use only J COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, V~A 24018 f703) 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 date rec ived ~ • zz/4p` received y:J' u,• applicatigr~~ ~ PClHZ:, da~/~; placards issued: HOS dal ; ~/~~ Case Number: '-r • • Check type of application filed (check all that apply): ^ REZONING ®SPECIAL USE ^VARIANCE Applicant's name: VIRGINIA TOWERS , ID?C . Php ne: 2 4 5 0 6 Address: P . O . Box 1110 6 Zi Code: L nchbur Virginia 24506 Owner's name: J . MORRIS CRUMPACKER, JAMES N CRUMPACKER, Jf~hone: Address: JEAN C BROWN and DEBRA C . MOORE Zip Code: 2 4 019 Location of property: Tax Map Number: part of 39 .00-1 See Attached Schedule Magisterial District: -B~Sb-etC'?~'~-- Community Planning Area: ~~ Size of parcel (s): Approx. 8 acres sq.ft. Existing Zoning: AG-3 Existing Land Use: Agriculture/Rural Preserve District ' :~::: Proposed Zoning: Special Use Permit Proposed Land Use: Broadcast Tower For Staff Use Only Use Type: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the reques eJd district? YES X NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. ~ / Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES X NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO €~~~ Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v ws v ws v Consultation 8 1 /2" x 1 1 " concept plan Application fee Application ~~'~~. Metes and bounds description ~`~~< Proffers, if applicable Justification ?x': Water and sewer application Adjoining property owne. s /hereby certify that / am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting wish the knowledge and consent of the owner. r~l Owner's Signature: Virginia Towers , I~?g . ~Y = ~n~ ~7 • The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the ne=_d and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the follo~.ving questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furhers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinanc=. Petitioner's request is for a use recognized in the AG/3 agricultural/rural preserve district. • Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roa-a<e Ccunty ~~, Comprehensive Plan. Your applicant believes that its request will further -the intent and purposes of the County's comprehensive plan in that the property will be used in a manner consistent with the adjacent property. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/se~Ner, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. It is anticipated that there will be little, if any impact on the adjoining properties as the facility will be unmanned, only requiring occasional visits by technical staff. ' Virginia Towers, Inc. . Applicant .T ~ GLENN, FLIPPIN, FELDMANN Sc DARBY 200 FIRST CAMPBELL SpUARE ' POST OFFICE BOX 2887 ROA_tiOK£, VIRGINIA 24001 (703) 224-8000 FAX(703)224-8050 MARYELLEN F. GooDLATTE Dircet Dial (703) 2248018 December 21, 1994 HAND DELIVERED Ms. Janet Scheid Roanoke County Department of Planning and Zoning 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Re: Application for Special Use Permit: Virginia Towers, Inc. Dear Janet: Enclosed please find an application for a special use permit on behalf of our client, Virginia Towers, Inc. Enclosed with the application is a metes and bounds description and plat of that portion of the 236 acre tract atop Read Mountain which is the subject of this special use permit application. Attached as a concept plan is the technical sketch of the broadcast tower. The application fee of $40 as well as the list of adjacent property owners (Roanoke County and Botetourt County) are also attached. The application seeks permission to build and operate an 80 foot broadcast tower on the property. If allowed, radio stations WRDJ and WJJS will use the tower to transmit their signals. During our consultation, you requested additional details on the tower. In response to your questions, I have spoken with Keith Putbrese, the corporation's attorney coordinating its FCC/FAA application as well as Russ Brown, the operations manager of the radio stations, both of whom have technical expertise. They have advised that the antenna on the tower will not protrude above the tower height (80 feet) but will be contained within a circular tube along the side of the tower. It will be located on a platform below the top of the tower. The height of the antenna will be about three feet. There will be a second antenna which will serve as a studio- to-transmitter link which will be placed on a small platform at approximately tree height on the tower. • GLENN, FLIPPI\T, !'ELDMANN VC DAI3BY Ms. Janet Scheid ' December 21, 1994 Page 2 That antenna will be located in a small square structure, approximately 2 to 2-1/2 feet alongside the tower. Thus the unsightly appendages which can accompany other types of transmitting towers (dishes atop cellular broadcasting towers, e.g.) will not be present. The tower itself will be self supporting and will not require any supporting wires. There will be a small outbuilding adjacent to the tower to house the transmitter. Access to the site will be through other property of Mr. Crumpacker. Virginia Towers expects to submit a subdivision plat for review and approval of the appropriate Roanoke County officials. Virginia Towers will be working with T. P. Parker & Son in this process. We understand that the Planning Commission would expect to visit the site on the afternoon of Tuesday, February 7 between 3:00 p.m. and 5:00 p.m. Currently, access to the site has been afforded by an adjacent property owner who has permitted Virginia Tower representatives use of his road. That private road is gated and Virginia Tower must secure the permission from the owner in advance. We will contact that owner prior to February 7 to seek permission for the Commission and its staff to view the site. As you plan the Commission's schedule that afternoon, knowing a more precise time between the hours of 3:00 and 5:00 that day would help making the arrangements with our neighbor easier. Please let me know if you require any further information in support of this application. We appreciate your assistance. Very truly yours, ,~ Maryellen F. Goodlatte MFG:jry:3039000 Enclosure cc: Virginia Towers, Inc. w/enc. Mr. J. Morris Crumpacker w/enc. Keith Putbrese, Esq. w/enc. • • i~ ~ 7 ~q ~" O , sr3 ~ ~9URNETTE p• ~. . ' ~ ~„~ ,., M ~~ ,`g~~°~ HGHTS. ~ ROANOK~ ~ NTY f~ a 621 v ' C ~ Beacnn < E TfRN S7AT +N; vur~o++ C6 ~ ~ ~ $$ ~~ l'o~~f °~%~yJ'';VICINITY MAP _ T- to Q NORTH •N t 2 ~ ~ s~ ~? . Ciy d p~^Ok~ DEPARTMENT OF PLANNIA'G AND ZONING 20O' I/~C(` VIRGINIA TOWERS SPECIAL USE PERMIT ' ~. ~ ~_ /~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 23, 1995 ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO VIRGINIA TOWERS INC. TO CONSTRUCT A BROADCAST TOWER ATOP READ MOUNTAIN APPROXIMATELY .4 MILE NORTH OF SUMMIT RIDGE ROAD, (TAX PARCEL 39.00- 1-1), HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Virginia Towers Inc. has filed a petition to allow the construction of a broadcast tower atop Read Mountain approxi- mately .4 mile north of Summit Ridge Road in the Hollins Magiste- rial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on May 2, 1995; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on January 24, 1995; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on May 23, 1995. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to allow the construction of a broadcast tower atop Read Mountain approximately .4 mile north of Summit Ridge Road in the Hollins Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1-456 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and hereby grants a Special Use Permit to Virginia Towers Inc. to allow said use. vatower 1 1UIIIIIilllllillilililllllllllllilllllllilllllllllllllllllil~lllllll~lll IIIIIIIIIIiIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIilllllll Ililllllll IIIIl~ _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. / -" ~ APPE CE REQUEST -_ ~UBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CI TIZENS COMMENTS __ SUBJECT: /z~l~ /1'10~/" ~x/ ~ ~" o~v~~ _ _ _. I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. __ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: __ __ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to c omment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue. and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to _= do otherwise. __ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. v ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. ~, ~~ r -_ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME ~~~oP~~~ /~~ ~~~~/~%'~ c ADDRESS ~ ~'~~~ G®C~c~`D ~'Gs ~ G~'Ol~~~~ !~l~-. PHONE `ZO ~ -- 3 ~s - ~- ~ l ~ ._~ Ilillllllllllllilllillllllllllllllllllllllilllllillllllillliililllilillillllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllillllllililllilllm ''~ ~7 April 24, 1995 An outdoor classroom and Going history museum enabling ttisirars to (earn about the land, uikiG(e, acid early American cisaG,a6ons through a diversity ofexperiences at the • American Center for Rare and Endangered Species • The Environmental Education Center of Virginia • American Wilderness Park • Native American Indian Park • Blue Ridge Settlement or Mi&post 115 on die Blue Ridge Parkuny Administered by Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority Virginia Code §10.1-1600 et. seq. in parmership unto The River Foundation I.R.C. §50l (c) (3) Post Office Box 8508 Roanoke, Virginia 24014.8508 (703) 427.1800 FAX (703) 427-1880 Mr. John Hartley Department of Planning & Zoning Roanoke County P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 Dear Mr. Hartley: Re: Rezoning of 5.93 Acre Tract of Land on Hammond Drive, vnton Magisterial District This letter is written to confirm our telephone conversation of this date. Upon the recommendation of Supervisor Dr. Nickens, the Virginia Recreational Facilities .Authority is agreeable to the County's tabling action of the rezoning for an additional thirty (30) day period. Please see that this property is considered for rezoning by the Board at its May 1995 Meeting. Should you have questions or need additional information, please let me know. Let me thank the County Staff and you for the fine cooperation shown to the Explore Park. Sincerely, George W. Nester, CM, AICP Contract General Manager GWN/n ,~ County of Roanoke Department of Planning and Zoning Memorandum T0: Board of Supervisors FROM: Jon Hartley DATE: April 24, 1995 7- 7 RE: Continuance of Explore Park Request to Rezone 5.93 acres from EP to AG-3. Dr. Nickens has discussed the above cited rezoning with Mr. George Nester representing the Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority. With Mr. Nester's concurrence, Dr. Nickens will be requesting that the above rezoning petition be continued for an additional thirty (30) days which would place this item on the agenda for May 23, 1995. ACTION NO. ~-~ ~J' ITEM NUMBER ~ "' / AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 25, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance to rezone 5.93 acres of land from EP to AG-3, located at 2393 Hammond Drive, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of the Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority. COUNTY ADMINISTRATORS COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: At the March 28, 1995 meeting, there was a public hearing and second reading of an ordinance to rezone two parcels of land totaling 7.93 acres, upon the petition of the Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority. The Board approved rezoning parcel 1, consisting of 2.0 acres, and continued the request for rezoning parcel 2, consisting of 5.93 acres, to April 25, 1995. The Planning and Zoning Department has notified us that they have received no additional information concerning the 5.93 acres parcel since the March 28, 1995 meeting. Attached is the original rezoning information, and Mr. Harrington will be present at the meeting to answer questions. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, ~, a,~~ti cC~ ~ FIC~~~{ / Jonathan W. Hartley Elmer C. Hodge Assistant Director County Administrator Planning & Zoning ---------------------------------------------------------------- Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens V ' PETITIONER: VA RECREATIONAL FACILITIES CASE NUMBER: 6-3/95 Planning Commission Hearing Date: March 7, 1995 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: March 28, 1995 A. REQUEST Petition of VA Recreational Facilities Authority to rezone two parcels of land totaling 7.93 acres from EP to AG-3, located at 2331 and 2393 Hammond Drive, Vinton Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION Responding to questions from the Commission, staff pointed out that the 2-acre parcel required a variance because it didn't meet the 3-acre requirement for the AG-3 district; a letter from an adjoining property owner who requested a delay was handed out at the work session. The Commission asked about the easement and who will benefit from the sale of the properties. George Nester commented as follows: as a condition of the sale of the 5.93 acre parcel, we will require a 50-foot easement in order to have access to the remainder of the property; the two-acre parcel is under contract; the monies received from the sale of these properties will go to the Explore project. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS None. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Robinson moved to recommend approval of the request. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Hooker, Witt, Thomason, Robinson NAYS: None ABSENT: Ross F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map Staff Report _ Other Terrance Harrington, Secre~.aiy Roanoke Courity Planning Commission STAFF REPORT PART I PETITION: Va. Recreational Facilities Auth. PREPARED BY: Jon Hartley A. , EXECUTIVE SUMMARY V- ~~ FILE NO.: 6-3/95 DATE PREPARED: March 7,1995 The Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority proposes to sell two parcels occupied by single-family residences that have been determined to be surplus property. To insure clear title and improve marketability, they are requesting the property be rezoned from EP, Explore Park to AG-3. The staff does not anticipate any adverse impacts from this proposal. B. DESCRIPTION The Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority (VRFA) is requesting to rezone two parcels containing 2.0 acres and 5.93 acres respectively from the EP, Explore Park district, to AG-3, Low Density Agricultural. • The two parcels have been determined to be surplus property by the Explore Park Board of Directors. They are located at the end of Hammond Drive which is located in the Vinton Magisterial district. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS In the Explore Park district (Section 30-71) there is a requirement that only lands owned by the VRFA can be zoned EP. The only uses allowed under this EP zoning are those included in the Explore Master Plan approved by the Board in June 1993, which does not explicitly permit single family residences. While the use could be continued as a grandfathered activity, this could restrict interested buyers and limit financing options available. Under the proposed AG-3 zoning the minimum lot size is 3 acres. On February 15, 1995 the Board of Zoning Appeals considered and approved a variance for the existing 2 acre parcel. v-~ PART I I A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS T_ ~' Background: The Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority, the governing body for Explore Park, acquired land beginning in the late 1980's from willing sellers for the creation of Explore Park. In order to generate revenues for current projects, the Authority has reevaluated its property holdings and decided that a few parcels, including the parcels in question, could be sold without jeopardizing the long range Explore Park project. The parcels in question were created before 1980 and until 1992 were zoned A-1 with a minimum lot size of 15,000 sq. ft. In 1992 the parcel and surrounding area was zoned AG-3 during the Countywide Comprehensive Rezoning. In June 1993 767 acres, including the two acre parcel in question, were rezoned to the Explore Park (EP) district, a special district specifically established and designed for the Park. Existing Characteristics: Each of the lots in question presently contain a single family residence served by individual wells and septic systems. Access to the properties is by way of Hammond Drive, with the 5.93 acre further served by a 15 foot wide easement. Surrounding Area: The surrounding area consists of open space and scattered rural residences. Immediately adjoining the 2 acre parcel to the north is the Blue Ridge Parkway. With the exception of other, properties owned by VRFA, which are also zoned EP, the entire area is zoned AG-3. B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Development Potential: At this time there are no proposals to modify the existing uses of the property. Future use would be governed by the AG-3 district which is limited primarily to low density residential and agricultural uses. Neither of the parcels could be further subdivided (except under provisions for a family exemption) due to the 3 acre minimum lot size and the requirement for 200 feet of public road frontage. C. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This areas is designated in the 1985 Comprehensive Plan as Rural Preserve. The proposed zoning and current use would be consistent with the Plan Map and policies, given the historical configuration of these properties. Petition: VRFA 2 File No.: 6-3195 PART III STAFF CONCLUSIONS v-~- The rezoning proposed is primarily to permit the sale of property otherwise encumbered by a special zoning designation designed exclusively for the Explore Park. The present use which predates the 1992 zoning ordinance and limited potential for further development preclude any significant impact from this proposal. Approval of this request would ensure a clear and unencumbered title and should substantially improve the marketability of these two properties. No proffered conditions are recommended by staff. Petition: VRFA 3 File No.: 6-3/95 2.~ 87,120 Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT 8E ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. tvs v ws v ws v Consultation X 8 112" x 11' concept plan Application fee (WAIVED) X Application ~'s Metes and bounds description -'< Proffers, if applicable X Justification -: Water and sewer application X Adjoininfl property owners . -.- l hereby certify that / am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and copse f the owner. Owner's Signature: COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 FAX 17031 772-2030 ..~ , For staff use only _ date tac iyygg~~ aeei~,r • /!v r applicauon t! a~ PGE~ ,, placards issued: BOS d.,`•~ f Casa Number: ~ ~.'~ ._.J Check type of application filed (check all that apply): C~ REZONING ^ SPECIAL USE ^VARIANCE Applicant's name: Rupert Cutler Phone: 427-1800 Address: P • 0. Box 8508 Zip Code: Roanoke, Virginia 24014-8508 Owner's name: Virginia Recreational Facilites Authority Phone: 427-1800 Address: P • 0. Box 8508 Roanoke, Virginia Zip Code: 24014-8508 Location of property: Tax Map Number: 71.00-1-6 & 71 .00-1-8 2393 Hammond Drive ~ 2331 Hammond Dr Vinton Vir inia 24179 .Magisterial District:Vinton , g Community Planning Area: Roanoke River Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: Explore Park (EP District) ~ 5.93 acres Existing Land Use: Single Family Residential ~ 258.310.8 sq.ft. ::~: Proposed Zoning: AG-3 For staff usa Only Proposed Land Use: Single Family Residential Use Typa: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES X NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES X NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO ~'f • Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: _'~~- The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following Questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. This lot is presently zoned Explore Park (EP) District. The Explore Park Board of~ Directors has declared the lot surplus. To enable prospective buyers to finance the purchase will require a conventional zoning designation. The adjoining properties are in private ownership and are zoned AG-3. This rezoning is compatible with existing neighborhood zoning. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. _ Long T~ange plans for the area suggest a planned unit (Explore type use). Existing land use is residential for the subject lot. Existing land use for the area is predominantly AG-3. Although this reversion is inconsistent with general plan, it is consistent with existing land uses of neighborhood. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. The impact will not be noticeable to adjoining neighbors or the community. No development is proposed: The existing single family use that is currently in place will be continued. Property is presently served by private well and septic system. . Applicant Vir inia Recreational Facilities A `~~ --- -- .__ January 24, 1995 ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~~~ PAR K An outdoor classroom and living history museum enab&ng sisitors to kam about the Land, wildlife, and early American cisiG;adons through a diversity of experiences at the • American Center for Rare and Endangered Species • The Environmental Education Ccnter of Virginia • American Wilderness Park • Native American Indian Park • Blue Ridge Settlement at Milepost 115 on the Blue Ridge Parkway County of Roanoke Planning Department 3738 Brambleton Avenue, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear Sir: Re: 2332 and 2393 Hammond Drive, Vinton Magisterial District Enclosed are two (2) completed applications for the rezoning of land owned by the Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority. This property has been declared surplus by the Authority. These efforts are geared to the liquidation of these properties. Proceeds from the sale will be used to offset part of the accumulated debt of the Explore Park. These properties are currently zoned Explore Park (EP) District. Adjoining properties are zoned AG-3. Both parcels are used for single family residential uses. The requested rezoning is compatible with existing zoning and land uses. Both units are served by individual wells and septic tanks. The two (2) acre parcel at 2331 Hammond Drive will require a variance. The Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum lot area in an AG-3 zone of three (3) acres. This parcel does not meet that minimum requirement. Other regulations or the AG-3 Zoning District can be met. Thank you for waiving the rezoning and variance fees for the Explore Park. Should you have questions or need additional information regarding these matters please contact me. Again, thank you for your continued cooperation and assistance. Sincerely, /~! r, Administered 6y Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority Virginia Code §10.1-1600 et. seq. in parmenhip with The River Foundation I.R.C. §501 (c) (3) Post Office Boz 8508 Roanoke, Virginia 24014-8508 (703) 47.1800 F.4X (703) 427•(880 ~,.d~.~ I George W. I`Ies er, CM, AICP General Manager Enclosures c: Dr. Rupert Cutler File VIRGINIA'S T 5-,~.,cN 1 - __ • - ~~ BEDFORD COUNTY ./Qv URGE j ~ ~ ~ . Nd/mY ROAO ~ 7100 0FCq r _ / 7R JLER PdRK rS ~ROANOKE `~' ~~~=~ -~' ~R. o COUNTY =-= _ ~4, "'`~i x)zeo C ~ ~''f ~ ~ ~'... ® MALC:OI_M VICINITY MAP ^' .~ . '~ NORTH ~...-u- i ---- _ _-- 5~~ Map 71.14 t'• loo' \- G ~~~ 0 o e • Ftid9e ...~~. K~ r.~+... A, ~-3 dwl • 8,ue I ~Jr ,..oo ~. RG-3 7 ~4 G-~~r 886Ac r,,, R G - 3 EP ~ tt w. a.~ Fxiliner .Lnt / 9L49 Ae IDI 1 t ~ - Rt. 634 ~ I i i i OI N i 5~~ Map 71.11 ~ y to t• ~ too' ~ z.3k ,~~~,,, . 9.ords ~ 1 230dcID1 ' 2.21 Ac ICl ..P ~~ I A G .3 t 88.3 Ae ~ P y G-~ ~ nazi x t I O IDf : ~~~ ~ G-3 A / 3 47.70 AC ~ G. A ~- {3 E o , z 2'1.56 AClDt ~A~ ~t 4678 Ac Rallw~ ` -~~ ~'~? \ \ ` ta~mr \v \ •.y DEPARTI~N'T OF PLANNIA'G <_ . AND ZONING VA RECREATIONAL FACILITIES AUTHORITY 7.t.oo-t-6 ~ 7t.oo-t-8 T- ,~'' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MAY 23, 1995 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 5.93 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 2393 HAMMOND DRIVE (TAX MAP NO. 71.00-1-6) IN THE VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF EP TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF AG-3 UPON THE APPLICATION OF VA RECREATIONAL FACILITIES AUTHORITY WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 28, 1995, and the second reading and public hearing were held March 28, 1995, and continued until April 25, 1995; and continued until May 23, 1995; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 7, 1995; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a parcel of land containing 5.93 acres, as described herein, and located at 2393 Hammond Drive, (Tax Map Number 71.00-1-6) in the Vinton Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of EP, Explore Park District, to the zoning classification of AG-3, Agricultural/Rural Preserve District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of VA Recreational Facilities Authority. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Beginning at a point in the center of the outlet road leading to Va. Sec. Rte. 1029, being the southeasterly corner of John 1 ~~ T. Schaaff property and being the northeasterly point of the property hereby described; thence with center of the outlet road along the line of Alvin B. Hammond property S. 0 deg. 15' 57" E. 307.57 feet to a planted stone; thence S. 13 deg. 00' W. 25 feet, more or less, to a point; thence with a new line through Harvey J. Schaaff and Lola G. Schaaff property and along the center of an outlet-road S. 56 deg. 17' W. 188.03 feet, more or less, to a point; thence still with the center of the said outlet road S. 47 deg. 00' 40" W. 295.96 feet to a point on the easterly line of the Mary Belle Schaaff property; thence with the said line of her property N. 38 deg. 13' 20" W. 558.74 feet to an iron by a corner post corner to Alvin B. Hammond property; thence with the line of the Alvin B. Hammond property N. 7 deg. 53' 15" W. 36.22 feet to a point in the center of an outlet road; thence along the center of the outlet road and with the line of the John T. Schaaff property the five following courses and distances: S. 81 deg. 50' 40" E. 145.39 feet to a point; thence N. 80 deg. 44' 40" E. 99.74 feet to a point; thence N. 52 deg. 21' 10" E. 129.97 feet to a point; thence N. 64 deg. 17' 10" E. 130.99 feet to a point; thence N. 88 deg. 34' E. 282.04 feet to the Place of Beginning, and containing 5.93 acres and being as shown on a map made by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers and Surveyors, dated 14 December 1978 of record in Deed Book 1117, page 289 in the Roanoke County Circuit Court Clerk's Office and designated as Tax Map No. 71.00-1-6. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. zoning.varec.523 2 ~ ~ -r- ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MAY 23, 1995 ORDINANCE 52395-20 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 3.06 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 5240 HOLLINS ROAD (TA% MAP NO. 39.05-1-10) IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF I- 1, CONDITIONAL, AND C-1, CONDITIONAL, TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-1 UPON THE APPLICATION OF REFORMATION HERALD PUBLISHING ASSOCIATION WHEREAS, this property was rezoned to I-1, Conditional, and C-1, Conditional in 1986; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on March 28, 1995, and the second reading and public hearing were held April 25, 1995; and continued until May 23, 1995; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on April 4, 1995; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 3.06 acres, as described herein, and located at 5240 Hollins Road, (Tax Map Number 39.05-1-10) in the Hollins Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of I-1, Conditional, and C-1, Conditional, Industrial District and Office District, to the zoning classification of C-1, Office District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of 1 r Reformation Herald Publishing Association. 3. That the owner voluntarily petitions the Board of Supervisors to repeal the conditions, voluntarily proffered by the owner in 1986. The Board of Supervisors hereby repeals and removes the proffered conditions from this real estate. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at an iron pin on the west side of Hollins Road (Va. Sec. Rte. 601) which point is the corner to the Nadine K. Noell property and is designated as "2" on the Plat Showing Property (3.06 Ac.) Being Conveyed to Reformation Herald Publishing Association," dated December 31, 1985, revised June 6, 1986, and prepared by Buford T. Lumsden & Associates, P.C., Engineers and Surveyors; the true place of beginning; thence N. 77° 10' 33" W. 300 feet to a corner marked by an iron pin on the line of the Dowdy property; thence with the Dowdy line N. 11° 21' 00" E. 166.36 feet to an iron pin being designated as "4" on the plat; thence S. 80° 57' 00" E. 300 feet to a point; thence with a new division line S. 11° 18' 22" W. 186.12 feet to the Place of BEGINNING, and containing 1.21 acres. BEGINNING at an iron pin on the west side of Hollins Road (Va. Sec. Rte. #601) which point is the corner to the Nadine K. Noell property and is designated as "2" on the Plat Showing Property (3.06 ac.) Being Conveyed to Reformation Herald Publishing Association, dated December 31, 1985, revised June 6, 1986, and prepared by Buford T.Lumsden & Associates, P.C., Engineers-Surveyors; thence with the Noell property N. 77° 10' 33" W. 413.51 feet to a point; thence with a new division line N. 11° 18' 22" E. 186.12 feet to a point; thence with the property of Seventh Day Adventist Reform Movement General Conference S. 80° 57' 00" E. 394.30 feet to an iron pin on the west side of Hollins Road; thence with the west side of Hollins Road S. 6° 6' 00" W. 213.48 feet to the place of BEGINNING and containing 1.85 acres. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is 2 directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. llen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 3 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~ ~./ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 23, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Rezoning Request of Reformation Herald Publishing Company, Hollins Road COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~ BACKGROUND' The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this request on April 4, 1995 and recommended approval of this rezoning. On April 25, 1995 the Board tabled this rezoning request to allow staff additional time to research issues regarding the development of the building and to discuss with the developer issues related to the relocation of the public water line along the Hollins Road frontage of this property. In a memo sent to the Board dated May 2, 1995 (attached) the staff presented information on the development history of this project. This information verifies that this building was not constructed in violation of any existing zoning ordinance. Gary Robertson has confirmed that the water line issue has been resolved to the satisfaction of the Utility Department and the Department of Engineering and Inspections. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: That the Board of Supervisors consider this request on May 23rd, and take action to approve or deny the request. I ~p 2 Respectfully Submitted, Terrance Har ngton, AICP Direct of Planning and Zoning Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Approved, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens Vote No Yes Abs 7=8 Roanoke County Department of Planning Memorandum TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Terrance L. Harrington, AICP Director of Planning and Zoning DATE: May 2, 1995 RE: Seventh Day Adventist Office Building; Hollins Road At the April 25, 1995 public hearing on this request, several issues were raised regarding the proposed use this building. The first issue involved the location of a small worship area in the office building. The staff has researched the plan and permit approval history of this project and has discerned the following information: A set of site development plans for this office building was submitted on January 25, 1994. The site development plans were designated as "Seventh Day Adventist General Office Building". The site development plans were reviewed in accordance with the standards for office buildings and were approved on April 27, 1994. The building construction plans were also submitted on January 25, 1994. These plans were also labeled as "Seventh Day Adventist General Office Building". On one of the floor plan layout sheets one room of this office building was designated a "worship area". In accord with the building code, these building construction plans were approved by the Building Commissioner on March 21, 1994. A building permit for this project was issued on April 28, 1994. This building permit was for the construction of an office building (See attached permit). The proposed rezoning request was submitted by the applicant to eliminate the dual zoning on the property, and the conditions pertaining to the construction of the duplexes. The staff became aware of the small worship area only when we were preparing the rezoning analysis. Although this worship area could be considered an accessory use to a church-owned office building approval of the rezoning will allow the worship area to be considered a principal use along with the office use. The second issue raised on the 25th, was the need for this land as industrial property. All rezoning requests are reviewed by the T- S Economic Development Department for conformity with economic development goals and objectives. In reviewing this request, the Economic Development Department did not object to the rezoning of this parcel to allow the office building. I hope this information is helpful. I am in contact with the applicant to discuss these issues. In addition, Gary Robertson is having discussions with Mr. Burec regarding issues relating to grading and the possible relocation of the water line along the front of this property. Please let me know if you have any questions. c: Tim Gubala Elaine Gall Gary Robertson Elmer Hodge '~ PETITIONER: REFORMATION HERALD PUBLISHING ASSOC. CASE NUMBER 10~F/95 Planning Commission Hearing Date: April 4, 1995 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: April 25, 1995 A. REQUEST Petition of Reformation Herald Publishing Assoc. to rezone 3.06 acres from I-1 conditional and C-1 conditional to C-1 to house administrative offices and church services, located at 5240 Hollins Road, Hollins Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Commission asked what portion of the property is to be rezoned from I-1 to C-1. Mr. Garman responded that it is the front portion; the rear portion is already C-1 conditional, and the applicant is requesting that conditions be removed from the entire property. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS None. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Ross moved to recommend approval of the petition. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Witt, Ross, Thomason, Hooker, Robinson NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report _ Other Terrance H gton ecretary Roanoke ounty P anning Commission ^T STAFF REPORT PETITIONER: Benjamin Burec CASE NUMBER: 10-4/95 PART 1 A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PREPARED BY: L. GARMAN DATE: April 4, 1995 A petition has been filed by Mr. Benjamin Burec to rezone 1.85 acres of a 3.06 acre parcel, from I-1 to C-1 and remove the proffered conditions from the total 3.06 acres. The property is currently divided into two zoning designations, the front 1.85 acres is zoned -1 and the rear 1.21 acres is zoned C-1, the same proffered conditions apply to both zoning designations. An office building, with a 40 seat chapel, is currently being constructed on the I-1 portion of the property. The chapel is not a use permitted in this district. B. DESCRIPTION The property is located at 5240 Hollins Road, in the Hollins Magisterial District. There is a building being constructed on the parcel to be used for offices and a 40 seat chapel. A site plan and a building permit was approved for this office building, however the chapel was not shown on the site plan. Also on the parcel is a single family dwelling used as a temporary office that will be demolished when the new building is completed. Adjacent land uses consist of a single family dwelling west of the property, zoned R-2; on the south, a single family dwelling zoned R-2, and an undeveloped parcel zoned C-2; on the north is a single family dwelling, also owned by the applicant, which is used as an office and residence, zoned C-2; on the east, across Hollins Road, is a single family dwelling, zoned I-2. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS The present I-1 and the C-1 zoning designations have the following conditions: 1. There will be no commercial printing done on the premises. 2. All activities will be related to the requirements of the denomination. 3. The storage and publishing operations and activities connected therewith will be confined to the front half of the parcel. 4. Property and buildings will be used only for those uses stated, i.e., two duplex units and a facility for the packaging and distribution of mail. The applicants request for a C-1 designation on the front portion of the property, and to remove the above conditions for the entire parcel, would allow all C-1 uses, including the chapel in the new office building. A site plan and building permit has previously been approved for the office building only. Additional use and design standards, specifically additional parking and a required buffer yard, would apply since a portion of the building will be used as a chapel. / '' PART II A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Location -The property is located at 5240 Hollins Road, approximately 450 feet north of the intersection of Hollins Road and Lois Lane (private road). Topographv/Veaetation -The site rises approximately 30 feet, consistently, from Hollins Road back 200 feet. The site levels for about 400 feet then slopes downward approximately 20 feet to the rear property line. Vegetation is typically field grasses and sparsely wooded. Surrounding Neighborhood -The Hollins Road area is a mix of light industrial and residential uses. B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Lavout/Architecture -The building being constructed is barely visible from Hollins Road due to the rising topography. The building will be approximately 6,500 square feet, including 609 square feet fora 40 seat chapel. Parking will accommodate 33 vehicles with an additional 7 spaces on the adjoining property, which is adequate for the office and the chapel. Landscaping, consisting of evergreen trees, is proposed along the southern property boundary. Access -Access is off Hollins Road. VDOT has no objection to the proposed zoning change. The entrance will be improved as the approved site plan develops. Traffic Generation/Circulation - 1992 traffic count for Hollins Road (Rt. 601) between Plantation Road (Rt. 115) and Carlos Drive (Rt. 616) was 5,626 vehicles per day. It should be noted that the traffic on Hollins Road will have a significant increase after the opening of Hanover Direct. VDOT has no objection to this request. Fire Rescue/Utilities -The building being constructed will use public water and sewer. According to the Roanoke County Utility Department, the existing water and sewer will not be affected. Fire and rescue have no objections to this request. C. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Land Use Plan designates the property as Transition. The proposed development, as well as the other permitted uses in the C-1, zoning district conforms with the intent of the Transition designation. The Transition area encourages uses types which serve as a buffer between conflicting land uses. The subject property separates an I-2 district across Hollins Road from a R-2 district behind the property. PART III STAFF CONCLUSIONS T~ In 1986, the property was rezoned from R-1 to the present I-1 and C-1 with conditions to allow the owner to construct an office for storage and packaging of church literature, and to construct two duplexes. The I-1 zoning allowed the storage and packaging use and the zoning conditions limited it as the only use for the parcel. The C-1 district allowed the duplex units on the rear portion of the property and was limited to only that use by the same conditions. Since that time, the owners intended use of the property has changed from the packaging/storage facility to a general administrative office. The plans for the office building were approved in 1994, the plan did not indicate that a chapel would be in this building. Because the applicant no longer desires a use which requires I-1 zoning, a C-1 district would allow a more flexible use of the property with no significant impact to the surrounding area. It would also allow the chapel, included in the new office building, which otherwise would have to be omitted before final zoning approval for occupancy. If the conditions are removed from the rear portion of the property, all C-1 uses will be permitted, currently two duplexes is the only use allowed. If this petition is granted, screening will be required between the applicant's parcel and the adjacent R-2 properties, prior to occupancy of the new building . / -- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MAY 23, 1995 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 3.06 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 5240 HOLLINS ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 39.05-1-10) IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF I-1, CONDITIONAL, AND C-1, CONDITIONAL, TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-1 UPON THE APPLICATION OF REFORMATION HERALD PUBLISHING ASSOCIATION WHEREAS, this property was rezoned to I-l, Conditional, and C-l, Conditional in 1986; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on March 28, 1995, and the second reading and public hearing were held April 25, 1995; and continued until May 23, 1995; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on April 4, 1995; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 3.06 acres, as described herein, and located at 5240 Hollins Road, (Tax Map Number 39.05-1-10) in the Hollins Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of I-1, Conditional, and C-1, Conditional, Industrial District and Office District, to the zoning classification of C-1, Office District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Reformation Herald Publishing Association. 1 / '" ~3 3. That the owner voluntarily petitions the Board of Supervisors to repeal the conditions, voluntarily proffered by the owner in 1986. The Board of Supervisors hereby repeals and removes the proffered conditions from this real estate. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at an iron pin on the west side of Hollins Road (Va. Sec. Rte. 601) which point is the corner to the Nadine K. Noell property and is designated as "2" on the Plat Showing Property (3.06 Ac.) Being Conveyed to Reformation Herald Publishing Association," dated December 31, 1985, revised June 6, 1986, and prepared by Buford T. Lumsden & Associates, P.C., Engineers and Surveyors; the true place of beginning; thence N. 77° 10' 33" W. 300 feet to a corner marked by an iron pin on the line of the Dowdy property; thence with the Dowdy line N. 11° 21' 00" E. 166.36 feet to an iron pin being designated as "4" on the plat; thence S. 80° 57' 00" E. 300 feet to a point; thence with a new division line S. 11° 18' 22" W. 186.12 feet to the Place of BEGINNING, and containing 1.21 acres. BEGINNING at an iron pin on the west side of Hollins Road (Va. Sec. Rte. #601) which point is the corner to the Nadine K. Noell property and is designated as "2" on the Plat Showing Property (3.06 ac.) Being Conveyed to Reformation Herald Publishing Association, dated December 31, 1985, revised June 6, 1986, and prepared by Buford T.Lumsden & Associates, P.C., Engineers-Surveyors; thence with the Noell property N. 77° 10' 33" W. 413.51 feet to a point; thence with a new division line N. 11° 18' 22" E. 186.12 feet to a point; thence with the property of Seventh Day Adventist Reform Movement General Conference S. 80° 57' 00" E. 394.30 feet to an iron pin on the west side of Hollins Road; thence with the west side of Hollins Road S. 6° 6' 00" W. 213.48 feet to the place of BEGINNING and containing 1.85 acres. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in 2 / -~ zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. DOC.AGENDA.ZONING.REFORM ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~ " AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 23, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Public Hearing for Proposed Budget for FY 1995-96. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This time has been set aside for a public hearing to receive written and oral comment from the public concerning the proposed annual budget for fiscal year 1995-96. A sununary of the proposed budget was advertised in the Roanoke Times and World News on May 16, 1995. Respectfully submitted, Brent Robei tson Budget Manager Approved by, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Approved Denied Received Referred To ACTION () Motion by: O O (1 VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy _ _ Johnson _ _ Kohinke Minnix Nickens _ II~~I~~IIIIIIIIIIIIIIilllllllllilllllllllll~~li~~ll~~ll~llil~lll~lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllll~ -~ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ = AGENDA ITEM NO. ~, = - - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - APPE CE REQUEST - _ _ _ _ __ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE y CITIZENS COMMENTS = - - - - -_ /,p -_ SUBJECT: c? ~ n ~ ~ d S ~ ~ e ~- - ~~ - - - - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the = meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS -_ FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED c BELOW: - - - - - ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue. - and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ofgthe Board to do otherwise. - = ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their oint of view only. - _ Questions of clarification may be entertained by the C airman. - ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = vnth the clerk = ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP c SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDMDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. = - - - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - _ - _ - _ - _ - _ - _ - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - _ _ - NAME ~( ~' C ~ ~ ( - - - ADDRESS ~ ~' G ~ ~ ~, ~, ~/ ~ / /-~ ~ /I l~ ~ - PHONE ~ ~ ~F~ 7 Ufa ~ Iliillllllllllllilllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllliilllllllllllllllllllilliiillllllilllllllillllllllillllllllll~ Ililillllllllil~llllillllllllllllllllll~I~IIIII~~IIIII I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1111111111111111~111 _~ _ _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. _ _ APPE CE REQUEST __ _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE ~ CITIZENS COMMENTS .~ , SUBJECT, l(n~" r ~ /~ ,-~ ~ ~ ~-~- • > I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the c meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. __ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS = FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: -_ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutest _ o comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue. and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ofgthe Board to __ do otherwise. __ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. c _ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments vnth the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK _ ~' ~ .. ~% NAME ~~ ~ ~ ~-- ~ (<~ c~~~~-~c- `''°-__ _ -~ ~7 ~' - ADDRESS - ~~ - ~' /~,"; ``~ ~_ PHONE _ ~ t~ ~ ._ > ~ ~~ 111111!llllllllllillilllliilllilllilllllllllillllllliilllilllllllillllllllllllllllll111!1!!illlllllllilllillililllllllillliillllm ittttittitittttttititititttittttttttitttti~~i~iii~~itiiiiii~tiiiiiitttttttttttttittitttttittttt~t~i~~tiiitiiitt~ _ . _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. APPE = CE REQUEST _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS c -_ SUBJECT: LS c I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the c meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. __ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to co t mmen whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue. _ and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of~the Board to _= do otherwise. __ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ _ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ _ _ __ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. c = ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. _ -_ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY = AND GIVE TO THE CLERK _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ ~ _ S NAME r ~ Lr~ _ -_ _ _ c ~ ADDRESS ~ ~ ~ ~ r v~ ~ Q(.~.C~ ~-~ ~ r PHONE ~ Yt ~'l , ~(~ . ~~ ~ ~ ~j fitttittttittttttttttiiiiittttttttttitttitmiitttttttttttttttttttittttttttttitttittttttttittttitttitttitittttttttiittittittit itt~iil 1111111111.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I~~~IIIlJ,1J _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. C, -- ~ - - i - ~ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - APPE CE REQUEST - _ _ __ C.- PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS - - SUBJECT: lG/ % ~- _ ~~ . ~'~ Uc~~, ,~- __ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Su = = pervisors to recognize me during the = meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS - = FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED - - = BELOW: - ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue. - and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority oi~the Board to do otherwise. _ -_ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view oniv. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ - ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. c - ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. - ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. _ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - - - __ - = PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - _ - - - - - - NAME ~~ ~i4 ~ lC /3~c ~i~ ~ ~- - _ - _ - _ _ - IF 3 - - ADDRESS ~ S .,~ ~;'~~;N s~ ~~ k~. ~/~~. ~~ y~ ,~ - - - - - - _ - PHONE ~~~ 333 > _ - - -.. ~_ mllllllllllilllllilliillilllllillillllllllll 11 lllllllllllllllllllllillllliillllllllllllllllllilllllllilllllilllllllllllllll 11111~1~I llllllllllll Illlllllillillliiilillllllllllililillllllllllll IIIIIIIIII IIII I I IIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIililllllllilllllllllllllllll IIIII _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ "" ~ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ - APPE CE REQUEST - _ _ '_ 7~PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS CO MMENTS Sva~JECT: ~l 1 ? `_ C~/.~ A~~~r ~ - j" - - ~_ ~. - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. _ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS = = FOR THE RECORD, I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED = BELOW: - _ = _ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue. _ = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the ma~ortty o~the Board to __ do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. = Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. - ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. - - ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP = SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. _. - - ~_ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK = - .., - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - _ _. =_ - ~_ NAME ~ ~~ _ r ~,~ - - __ - - ADDRESS ~C lam.! ~ ~ -~ ~- ,~ / ~, . ~- - - _ .,. ~ '~~ "~°~ pxoNE _ ~ 1~ ~-~f.-;- ~~ ~ Illllllllllllllllillillllllllillilillllllllilllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllilllillllllillllllllllllllillllilllilllllllliillllilm i~lllllllll lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllilllllllll l lllllililillllll llllliliilllllllllllllllllililllllill llllljj~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - APPE CE REQUEST - _ _ - `PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS - - ~ - SUBJECT: ~'( I ~~ S - ~ cQ ~ ~d~~ _ _ _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the __ meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS - FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED = BELOW: _ - - - - ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue. _ and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to __ do otherwise. -_ - ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. = Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. - _ - ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = with the clerk. _ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - _ _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - _ - _ _ - - - _. -_ - NAME ~ ~ - _ _ _ - -_ ADDRESS ~~~ 1 G~~,,,,d,, ,.~ ~ ~, ~ ~- _ _ _ PHONE _ Glaq - s3so - mllllliilllllllllliliilllillillillllllllilllllllllllllllllilillilllllilllllllililllllllliilllilllllillllilllllllilllllllli 111111~1~I llllllllillllllillllllllllillllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllillllillliillllllllliillll~ _ _ _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. - _ - _ - _ _ _ _ - APPE CE REQUEST - _ _ __ „PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS - _ - _ _ SUB CT• ~ 1 I ~,- / /, ~ ~' ~'` ~ ._r.~_ C ji'..~^ F'~~ (.' J C. ~~' ~'%t ~ - _ - - }'/{~ - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the __ meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. __ - WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED - - BELOW: - - ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue. = - and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of~the Board to _= do otherwise. - - ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. __ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. _ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - - - __ - c PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - s - ~ - - ~ - - - _ - _- - 1/ - - _ - _ - - - - ~ ~ ~ - ~ - - _ NAME ~ ~ . ` F ~? v . ~ ~_ ` , ~ ~- ~ - - - i %/i_ ~ c .~ ,, i / .~ ~~ ~ - = ADDRESS ~ ~t ± ~ ~;~~ ~ `:, f ~_ (; ~ , ~ ~ , , ~ - _ - - - - - _ - - - _ - - ;' - , - PHONE , ~, - -. ~.. fiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii,iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii - (~ County of Roanoke FY 1995-96 Budget Public Hearing IIAay 23, 1995 Budget Objectives ^ Balance the budget within existing tax rates Continue education and public safety as ^ Address capital, maintenance and top priorities infrastructure needs ^ Provide a compensation plan that attracts ^ Maintain or improve all service levels and retains quality employees Tax Rates 1994 1995 Real Estate $1.13 $1.13 Personal Property $3.50 $3.50 Machinery and Tools $3.00 $3.00 Proposed General Government Revenues Budget Proposed Increase FY 94-95 FY 95-96 (Decrease) Local Revenue Sources -- - - - - Real Estate Tax 36,800,000 39,000,000 2,200,000 Personal Property Tax 13,880,000 16,200,000 2,320,000 Other Property Taxes 2,080,000 2,240,000 160,000 Local Sales Tax 5,200,000 5,330,000 130,000 Utility Consumer Tax 3,700,000 3,700,000 0 Business License Tax 2,800,000 2,800,000 0 Motor Vehicle License Tax 1,450,000 1,475,000 25,000 Meals Tax 1,950,000 2,000,000 50,000 Other Local Revenue 4,416,966 5,009,493 592,527 Other Revenue Commonwealth 5,420,303 5,470,952 50,649 Federal 1,525,048 1,560,048 - 35,000 -- Subtotal 79,222,317 84,785,493 5,563,178 Non-Revenue Sources - ___3,071,330_ 4.?nom "~ Total Revenues 82,293.~~'' .~s~xa was~~P~ o> s>~a o~ ~o} d ~~~ro~ aoS Pu's f~1~n aau30 aa4 a~eu U~saa~o\dua o} o ~s~ad~o~ a Other U a~ Property - , o} pesodoa~~ a~\aoa ~ saa~oldwa ~ ea~'~ s\uau\apnbaa zaaouiatie~anea pay\aoa ~\\aMSe osaua~ ~\P~n} ,~ a1gnaapisu~ ~\aa } ao}6 Ua\~ uoa6~~~6 Sa\~aaQ!\ as ue~unH :~ uo S'oa~o~as~a~ou~.sao d saa\na Z o ~ ~~ ~ u~ seed a~~y\XO~d~eS se ~o~~~paS aaa Seu o0 ~22~ P ~ f~\ S~u> ~~up\\~a~ ~ X01 ~o~a ~ ~a6P~o, 9656 ~~~ ~~ MEMORANDUM T~: Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney FROM: Brenda J . Holton ~~ DATE: February 5, 1996 SUBJECT: REVISION OF ORDINANCES PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED Attached is another page one only for each of the ordinances listed below which were adopted at Board of Supervisors' Meetings on September 27, 1994, May 23, 1995, and November 21, 1995. 1. Ordinance 92794-13 2. Ordinance 52395-17 3. Ordinance 112195-15 The Planning Department has requested that the words "Conditional" be inserted into the titles of these ordinances and paragraphs 1 to more accurately reflect the changes made to the zoning classifications. If anyone needs another copy of the entire ordinance, please let me know. Otherwise, please replace each page one with the attached. Thanks for your help. Attachments OF AOANp~~ ti ~ ~ ~ , az 1 38 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 May 24, 1995 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNfX, CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 Mrs. Pat Dean 4329 Toddsbury Drive Vinton, VA 24179 Dear Mrs. Dean: The members of the Board of Supervisors wish to express their sincere appreciation for your previous service to the Fifth Planning District Commission. Citizens so responsive to the needs of their community and willing to give of themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce. I am pleased to inform you that, at their meeting held on Tuesday, May 23, 1995, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to reappoint you as a citizen representative to the Fifth Planning District Commission for another three year term. Your new term will begin on June 30, 1995, and expires on June 30, 1998. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, or appointed to any public body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act. Your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflict of Interest Act. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Sincerely, ~w„r. ~~~~~ H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix, Roanoke County Board of FM/bjh Enclosures cc: Wayne Strickland, Executive Director, 5PDC C~oixz~t~ o~~ ~.~~t~.o~~P Chairman Supervisors ®q F~ 0~ AOANp,~~ L ~ ~ ~ z v ' a 7838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 May 24, 1995 Mr. L. T. McGhee 1816 Pembrook Drive Vinton, VA 24179 Dear Mr. McGhee: (703) 772-2005 The members of the Board of Supervisors wish to express their sincere appreciation for your previous service to the Board of Zoning Appeals. Citizens so responsive to the needs of their community and willing to give of themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce. I am pleased to inform you that, at their meeting held on Tuesday, May 23, 1995, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to reappoint you as a member of the Board of Zoning Appeals for another five year term. Your new term will begin on June 30, 1995, and expires on June 30, 2000. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, or appointed to any public body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act. Your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflict of Interest Act. State law requires that you take an oath Clerk of the Roanoke County Circuit Court. administered rior to your participation on telephone Steven A. McGraw, at 387-6205, to oath administered, and Mr. McGraw has asked letter with you. of office before the This oath must be this Board. Please arrange to have the that you bring this On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. FM/bj h Enclosures cc: Tim Beard, Secretary, BZA Steven A. McGraw, Clerk, Circuit C~a~xx~#~ ~# ~o~x~~~.e Sincerely, ~ ~~~ ~~ H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix, Roanoke County Board of Court BOARD OF SUPERVISORS H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX, CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Chairman Supervisors ® Recycled P~ 0~ pOANp~,~ i. ' 9 z v a 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 (~o~ixxttg of ~~~tx~o~e P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 May 24, 1995 Mr. Geoffrey Ottaway 5288 Flintlock Circle, SW Roanoke, VA 24014 Dear Jeff: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX. CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NIC KENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 The members of the Board of Supervisors wish to express their sincere appreciation for your previous service to the Virginia Western Community College Board. Citizens so responsive to the needs of their community and willing to give of themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce. I am pleased to inform you that, at their meeting held on Tuesday, May 23, 1995, the Board of Supervisors voted to reappoint you as a member of the Virginia Western Community College Board for another four year term. Your new term will begin on June 30, 1995, and expires on June 30, 1999. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, or appointed to any public body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act. Your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflict of Interest Act. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Sincerely, ,A / 4~ ~ ~~~ H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix, Roanoke County Board of FM/bj h Enclosures cc: Dr. Charles Downs, President Virginia Western Community College 3095 Colonial Avenue, SW Roanoke, VA 24015 Chairman Supervisors ® R~.yaaa P~- O~ pOANp~~ L h A 2 G7 z ~ a~ 7 38 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 C~~r~xxY~ .~~ ~~xxr~r.~.~ P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNfX, CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE. SR.. VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. -lOHN50N HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NIGKENS VIN TOPI MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT May 24, 1995 (703) 772-2005 Mr. Tim Hoelzle 2017 June Drive, NW Roanoke, VA 24019 Dear Mr. Hoelzle: The members of the Board of Supervisors wish to express their sincere appreciation for your service to the Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission by completing the unexpired term of Ms. Rita Watson. Citizens so responsive to the needs of their community and willing to give of themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce. I am pleased to inform you that, at their meeting held on Tuesday, May 23, 1995, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to appoint you as a member of the Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission for a three year term representing the Hollins Magisterial District. Your new term will begin on June 30, 1995, and expires on June 30, 1998. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, or appointed to any public body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act. Your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflict of Interest Act. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Sincerely, , ~ ~~~ ~~~~~ H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors FM/bjh Enclosures cc: Pete Haislip, Director, Parks & Recreation ® Re~yded P~ ~ ROANp~~ L ti ~ A z ~ ~ a~ 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 May 24, 1995 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNfX, CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 Mr. Jack W. Griffith 4043 Snowgoose Circle, SW Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Mr. Griffith: The members of the Board of Supervisors wish to express their sincere appreciation for your previous service to the Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission. Citizens so responsive to the needs of their community and willing to give of themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce. I am pleased to inform you that, at their meeting held on Tuesday, May 23, 1995, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to reappoint you as a member of the Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission for another three year term representing the Cave Spring Magisterial District. Your new term will begin on June 30, 1995, and expires on June 30, 1998. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, or appointed to any public body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act. Your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflict of Interest Act. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Sincer ly, ~~~~ H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix, Roanoke County Board of FM/bj h Enclosures cc: Pete Haislip, Director, Parks & Recreation C~.~~txt#g o~f ~ ~~xxr.a ~.e Chairman Supervisors ®r~,aed P~ 0~ ROANp,1.~ a ~ A z v a~ 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR EL.MER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 May 24, 1995 Mr. Horace L. McPherson 3561 Forester Road, SW Roanoke, Va 24015 Dear Mr. McPherson: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS H. ODELL "FUZZY" MIN NIX, CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR r11LL5 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NIC KENS VIN TOt`7 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 The members of the Board of Supervisors wish to express their sincere appreciation for your previous service to the Highway and Transportation Safety Commission. Citizens so responsive to the needs of their community and willing to give of themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce. I am pleased to inform you that, at their meeting held on Tuesday, May 23, 1995, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to reappoint you as a citizen representative to the Highway and Transportation Safety Commission for another four year term. Your new term will begin on June 30, 1995, and expires on June 30, 1999. State law provides that .any person elected, re-elected, or appointed to any public body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act. Your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflict of Interest Act. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Sincerely, ~ 3 `~ FM/bj h Enclosures cc: Carol Broadhurst, Secretary, Office of the Public Defender 209 First Street, SW Roanoke, VA 24011 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors RCTSC O~ ROANp~.~ G ti A 2 L7 ~ a? 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 (~o~ixx~#g .o~f ~a~xx~~~.e P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 May 24, 1995 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS (703) 772-2005 The Honorable Alfred C. Anderson Roanoke County Treasurer P. O. Box 21009 Roanoke, VA 24018-0533 Dear Fred: The members of the Board of Supervisors wish to express their sincere appreciation for your previous service to the Fifth Planning District Commission. I am pleased to inform you that, at their meeting held on Tuesday, May 23, 1995, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to reappoint you as an elected representative to the Fifth Planning District Commission for another three year term. Your new term will begin on June 30, 1995, and expire on June 30, 1998. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, or appointed to any public body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act. Your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflict of Interest Act. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. S ince~ly, /I "' ZJ ~i H. Odell "Fuzz "Minn' y ix, Roanoke County Board of FM/bj h Enclosures cc: Wayne Strickland, Executive Director, SPDC Chairman Supervisors ®R Pater H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX, CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B EDDY WINDSOR 111LL5 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT O~ pOANp~.~ ti A 2 ~ ~ 2 ov a~ 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 (~~~x~#~ o~~ ~.o~xz~.o~~P P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 May 24, 1995 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNfX, CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR ~11LL5 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTO<`I MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 The Honorable Lee B. Eddy Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Lee: I am pleased to inform you that, at our meeting held on Tuesday, May 23, 1995, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to appoint you as Board Liaison to the Clean Valley Council for a two year term beginning June 30, 1995, and ending June 30, 1997. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, appointed, or re-appointed to any public body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act. Your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflicts of Interest Act. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Very tr~yly yours, ~u~~ H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors FM/bjh Enclosures cc: Ms. Ann Masters, Executive Director Clean Valley Council P. O. box 523 Roanoke, VA 24003 ®Re~yded paper o~ ROANp,~.~ ~. ~ z ~, Z o a 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 May 24, 1995 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS H. ODELL "FUZZY' MINNIX, CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHINKE. SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B EDDY WINDSOR MILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTO~% MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (703) 772-2005 Rev. Steven W. Harris Baptist Children's Home 860 Mt. Vernon Lane Salem, VA 24153 Dear Reverend Harris: On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, 1 would like to thank you for offering the invocation at our meeting on Tuesday, May 23, 1995. We believe it is most important to ask for divine guidance at these meetings and the Board is very grateful for your contribution. Thank you again for sharing your time and your words wifh us. With kindest regards, ~ /, ~~~ /`~~~ H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors (2~~ixrt#~ a~ ~ o~tr~o ~~ ® Recycled Paper ~.~~ . r, ~~~ ~ „_ F ~a3 ~~.~.i Fey c ~1 ` :eur Sports ent of Virginia Amateur Sports 0. Roanoke County has already s in this year's budget. ~ matching funds that they have funds for this year, but include the agencies. If the Board is willing to cons~uC~ ~,,,,.._,_ ~e next agenda. Otherwise, I will forward the letter to Budget Manager Brent nouC~tson. CC: Brent Robertson, Budget Manager 5~- ! 7 - ~ 5 ~..~ ~ r 6.- ;~u f f Mr. Eddy: We contacted Oak Grove Elementary School. They are very pleased that we are going to recognize their PTA at a Board meeting, but will not be able to attend on May 9 because that is their last PTA meeting of the year. We have tentatively set up recognition for May 23 meeting. Mary Allen 5/3/95 ~ ~ rct- r''cx ~' ~ - `7 ~ ~ SP SS 1 p !'1 l~v ~,e-e-- c~-e-e-- U ~c .AL NOTICE II interested persons that the Roanoke County ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ public hearing at their 7:00 p.m. session on W ~ ~• o ~ ~ x 3oard Meeting Room at the Roanoke County ~o y ~ "' y y• ~ a ~ •d Drive S. W. on the petition of Frank D. Porter ~ ~ ~• ~tion of the western portion of a 50 foot right-of- 0 ~ a un as Carolyn Circle, 50 foot right-of-way known ,.d ~ ~ ~d all public easements located within Block 2, y ~' ~' Hugh 4 and Block 1, Lots 26 through 28 shown ~~ o b o glands, Section 1, recorded in Plat Book 7, Page ~~' ~ ~ o• ~ igisterial District. - g -*r ~ ~ o ~ ~,} ~-_ ~ ~• 0 1 ed to this request may be examined in the office ~ ~ ~ id Inspections, located at the Roanoke County ~ ~ y b ,b~ `d f Day of May, 1995. ~ ~b ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ o Vl ~. o ~• `" y Mary H. Allen, CMC, Clerk to the Board W ~ CD ~ Roanoke County Board of Supervisors ~ :TIMES AND WORLD NEWS ON: ~. ~ o ~ ~ Z ~ Direct the bill for publication to: ~~ Lumsden Associates - \ P. O. Box 2669 4664 Brambleton Avenue Roanoke, VA 24018 ~, - ~, ~ ROAN ,~.~ a z ~ ~. o a? 1838 DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE May 12, 1995 Ms. Martha Plank Roanoke Times & World News Legal Advertisement Department 201-209 Campbell Avenue, SW Roanoke, VA 24011 Dear Martha: ~= ~:J L5 D C'~ /-'~,1' ~ ~ ~~a~ Please publish the enclosed public notice as a block advert 16, 1995. Bill the cost of publication to the Roanoke CoL at the following address: C~.aixx~#~ ~f ~..~~t~o~.~E DIANE D. HYATT, CPA E. GRICE, CPA \NT DIRECTOR -,-,~,-~ ~~ ~`° ~~°--..~' Cio Roanoke County Board of Supervisors ATTN: Mary Allen P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 S~ a,~.~/' .J ~- ~- I would like to review a draft of the advertisement on May 15, 1995. My fax number is 772-2186. Sincerely, ~. ~~~~ W. Brent Robertson Budget Manager Enclosure c: Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Mary Allen, Clerk to the Board Anne Marie Green, Community Relations Elmer Hodge, County Administrator P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2023 FAX: (703) 772-2186 ® Fiecyded Paper ~, - ~ County of Roanoke Notice of Public Hearing of the Proposed 1995-96 Fiscal Year Budget The County of Roanoke will hold a public hearing at 7:00 PM or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard on Tuesday, May 23, 1995 in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, Virginia. The purpose of the hearing is to receive written and oral comment from the public concerning the proposed annual budget for fiscal year 1995-96 summarized below and the FY 1996-2000 Capital Improvements Program. All interested citizens, groups, senior citizens, and organizations are encouraged to attend and to submit comments. Copies of the proposed budget will be available for public inspection at the office of the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors and all County libraries. Summary of Proposed 1995-96 Budget Revenue Estirr yes General Fund General Go~~ •nt General ~ ry Taxes Other Lc xes Permits. ;. Licenses Fines an •itures Charges vices Commoi n Federal -her Total General Government Youth H Compr< ~rvices Law Lit Recreate Gass Interna: Gara ~~ Total General Fund Debt Service Fu Capital Projects ,4 Internal Service ,i Water Fund Sewer Fund SchoolOperatin: ind School Cafeteria nd School Grants Ft: School Textbook. :nd Total R~°,~enues All Funds Less: Transfers Total Net of Transfers Amount 57,440,000 18,300,000 536,000 487,500 250,200 5,470,952 1,560,048 4,940,793 88,985,493 387,247 1,126,122 41,980 616,763 1,461,964 257,278 92,876,847 8,820,612 275,000 1,187,996 11,448,462 5,351,155 77,615,739 2,995,000 1,652,032 777,283 203,000,126 (53,950,298) 149,049,828 05/11/95 05:22 PM PROPOSED.WI~4 ti r Proposed Expenditures Amount General Fund General Government General Administration $ 2,115,233 Constitutional Officers 6,092,179 Judicial Administration 319,778 Management Services 1,690,775 Public Safety 9,249,300 Community Services 8,019,673 Human Services 8,233,987 Non-Departmental 3,934,353 Transfers to School Operating Fund 41,513,192 Transfers to Debt Service Fund 5,492,904 Other 2,324,119 Total General Government 88,985,493 Youth Haven II 387,247 Comprehensive Services 1,126,122 Law Library 41,980 Recreation Fee Class 616,763 Internal Services 1,461,964 Garage II 257,278 Total General Fund 92,876,847 Debt Service Fund Capital Projects Fund Internal Service Fund Water Fund Sewer Fund School Operating Fund School Cafeteria Fund School Grants Fund School Textbook Fund Total Expenditures All Funds Less: Transfers Total Net of Transfers 8,820,612 275,000 1,187,996 11,448,462 5,351,155 77,615,739 2,995,000 1,652,032 777,283 203,000,126 (53,950,298) 149,049,828 05/11/95 05:22 PM PROPOSED.WI~4 LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, May 23, 1995, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Virginia Towers Inc. for a Special Use Permit to construct a broadcast tower atop Read Mountain approximately .4 mile north of Summit Ridge Road, Hollins Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: May 4, 1995 _1re~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, May 9, 1995 Tuesday, May 16, 1995 Direct the bill for publication to: Virginia Towers Inc. c/o Maryellen Goodlatte Glenn, Flippin, Feldmann & Darby PO Box 2887 Roanoke, VA 24001 (703) 224-8000 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018 0` POAN ~.~ ,~ . .~ _ ~ sl 1838 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING TERRANCE L. HARRINGTON, AICP DIRECTOR OF PLANNING ~~~ 1 I ,. ~: ~~ i March 1, 1995 IMPORTANT NOTICE - PLEASE READ PLANNING COMMISSION BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS At the request of Virginia Towers Inc., this petition for a Special Use Permit to construct a broadcast tower atop Read Mountain has been continued to April. Please disregard the notice dated February 28. You will be notified at a later date of the meeting times. ~~~~~i~ Terrance Harrington, Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commission ajb P.O. BOX 29800 • ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 • (703) 772-2068 • FAX: (703) 772-2108 ® Recyded Paper GE~POANp~.c~ i L • Z ~ A a~ 7838 C~~~xxr# ~r~ aa~xxY.~ DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING TERRANCE L. HARRINGTON, AICP DIRECTOR OF PLANNING February 28, 1995 IMPORTANT NOTICE - PLEASE READ p ~d~odc~ . ~~ ~ ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS A request of the property described below has been filed with the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke. County. The Board has referred the matter to the Roanoke County Planning Commission for a recommendation. Information relative to this request is as follows: Petitioner Virginia Towers Inc. Purpose of Request• Special Use Permit to construct a broadcast tower atop Read Mountain Location of Property: Approximately .4 mile north of Summit Ridge. Road The date, time, and place of the public hearing scheduled by the Planning Commission on this request is as follows: TIIESDAY, MARCH 7, 1995 - 6 P.M. ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER - BOARD MEETING ROOM 5204 BERNARD DRIVE, ROANORE, VIRGINIA The date, time, and place of the public hearing scheduled by the Board of Supervisors on this request is as follows: TIIESDAY, MARCH 28, 1995 - 7 P.M. ROANORE COIINTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER - BOARD MEETING ROOM 5204 BERNARD DRIVE, ROANORE, VIRGINIA Additional information on this request Department of Planning and Zoning. ~ ~~ ~~~ Terrance Harrington, Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commission ajb may be obtained by contacting the P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 • (703) 772-2068 FAX: (703) 772-2108 ® Recyded Paper LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, May 23, 1995, in the Board.Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Kenneth McNeil to rezone approximately 2.62 acres from C-2 conditional to AV in order to operate a contractors' storage yard, located at 7210 Franklin Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: May 4, 1995 Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, May 9, 1995 Tuesday, May 16, 1995 Direct the bill for publication to: Kenneth McNeil c/o Ed Natt PO Box 20068 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 774-1197 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANORE~ VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, May 23, 1995, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of School Board of Roanoke County for a Special Use Permit to expand Glenvar High School, located at 4549 Malus Drive, Catawba Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: May 4, 1995 ~. ~~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, May 9, 1995 Tuesday, May 16, 1995 Direct the bill for publication to: School Board of Roanoke County c/o Balzer & Associates 1208 Corporate Circle Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-9580 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, May 23, 1995, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Jerry Mullins to rezone approximately 1.9 acres from C-1 to I-2 to construct an office/sales/light manufacturing facility, located adjacent to 3326 West Main Street, Catawba Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: May 4, 1995 Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, May 9, 1995 Tuesday, May 16, 1995 To be paid on delivery by: Jerry Mullins 7031 Southerland Circle Salem, VA 24153 (703) 375-2640 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, May 23, 1995, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Akfer Corporation to rezone approximately 68.4 acres from AG-3 to AR to construct single family detached dwellings, located beyond the terminus of Toddsbury Drive to the east, Vinton Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: May 4, 1995 7`~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, May 9, 1995 Tuesday, May 16, 1995 Direct the bill for publication to: Akfer Corporation c/o Julian Ferguson 4172 Toddsbury Drive Vinton, VA 24179 (703) 890-3603 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, May 23, 1995, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Roanoke County Planning Commission to rezone approximately 1.23 acres from C-2 to R-1 to allow continued use as a single family residence, located 123 John Richardson Drive, Hollins Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: May 4, 1995 7`~` - Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, May 9, 1995 Tuesday, May 16, 1995 Direct the bill for publication to: Roanoke County Planning Department PO Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018 ~ ~~~ o FIFTH PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION v ~ ~ 313 Luck Avenue, SW ' Post Office Box 2569 ~~=/ ~~ Roanoke, Virginia 24010 ~~'~ ~`"""`~ (703)343-4417 • fax (703)343-4416 ~~~odc~ III\11 , 9 f995 t J Ms. Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear Ms. Allen: May 8, 1995 According to our record of appointments, the term of Mr. Ed Kohinke, Sr., elected representative of Roanoke County on the Fifth Planning District Commission, expires June 30, 1995. The Commission Bylaws state that all appointments are for three-year terms. Mr. Kohinke is, of course, eligible for reappointment. Please notify the Commission of the County's official action in filling this upcoming vacancy on the Commission. Thank you. Yours truly, . ~ Gr/' Wayne .Strickland Secretary to the Commission WGS:jIp cc: Mrs. Wendy C. Wingo, 5PDC Chair Mr. Ed Kohinke, Sr. Serving Alleghany County, Botetourt County, Clifton Forge, Covington, Craig County, Roanoke City, Roanoke County, Salem, and the Town of Vinton pj :"r';~~ ~o~ 3~ ~4_ ~ ~ FIFTH PLANNING ®ISTRICT COMMISSION ~~- ~~ 313 Luck Avenue, SW ~~ .. ~ Post Office Box 2569 ~, Li w: ~. ~ ,~ ~~;~ ,~--~ ~ Roanoke, Virginia 24010 ~'~ °°~`"'"`~ (703)343-4417 • fax (703)343-4416 __ _ 1. rA ~~ '~ ~`''~ 9 (995 ' ,_ _ May 8, 1995 Ms. Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear Ms. Allen: According to our record of appointments, the term of Ms. Pat Dean, non-elected representative of Roanoke County on the Fifth Planning District Commission and Executive Committee, expires June 30, 1995. The Commission Bylaws state that all appointments are for three-year terms. Ms. Dean is, of course, eligible for reappointment. Please notify the Commission of the County's official action in filling this upcoming vacancy on the Commission and Executive Committee. Thank you. Yours truly, /I r W Wayne G. Strickland Secretary to the Commission WuS:jlp cc: Mrs. Wendy C. Wingo, 5PDC Chair Ms. Pat Dean Serving Alleghany County, Botetourt County, Clifton Forge, Covington, Craig County, Roanoke City, Roanoke County, Salem, and the Town of Vinton FIFTH PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION 313 Luck Avenue, SW Post Office Box 2569 Roanoke, Virginia 24010 (703)343-4417 • fax (703)343-4416 ~~, ; s~~ D Ms. Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P.J. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear Ms. Allen: May 8, 1995 According to our record of appointments, the term of Mr. Fred Anderson, elected representative of Roanoke County on the Fifth Planning District Commission, expires June 30, 1995. The Commission Bylaws state that all appointments are for three-year terms. Mr. Anderson is, of course, eligible for reappointment. Please notify the Commission of the County's official action in filling this upcoming vacancy on the Commission. Thank you. Yours truly, k~- VlJ Wayne .Strickland Secretary to the Commission WGS:jIp cc: Mrs. Wendy C. Wingo, 5PDC Chair Mr. Fred Anderson Serving Alleghany County, Botetourt County, Clifton Forge, Covington, Craig County, Roanoke City, Roanoke County, Salem, and the Town of Vinton ~~-~'~-19'P5 01~O9Ph1 FROM E~~! E~~hir~?~.~ C;.~.iawba O~usr- TO Supervisors P.O1 ~~~~-~ ~ _~~ ~ Fi~1~M ~LA~iNf~JG DiST~iCT ~plvtM~55iC~N ~~_- `~ 313 Luck Avenue, SW '-`~.~~ e ~~ ~ ~'~ ~ Poet Office Box 256 '°~« «~'" Roanoke, Virginia 24E574 (703)343-4417 • fax(7O3)343-4416 Ms. Mary H. Allen, Cierk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P.p. Box 29$00 Roanoke, Virginia 24Q1$ Dear Ms. Alien: May 8, i 995 ~' ~~' _~- ~ ~ ~~~~ ~~ t7 ~~ ~ ~ ~- ~D ~ d /~ ~' .~ G~,'~.` ~~~ ~ ti According to our rPr:crd of appointments, the term of Mr. Ed Kohinke, Sr., elected representative of aoanoke County on the 1`Ifth Planning pistrict Commission, expires June 30, 1 J95. The Commission Bylews state that all appointments are for three-year temps. Mr. Kohinke is, of course, eligible for reappointment. Please notify the Commission of the County's official ptctiorl in filling this u~,ccming vacancy on the Commission. Thank you. Yours truly, ~' 'Ways . Strlck~ancl Secretary to the Commission W~S:jlp cr.: Mr : ~ Wendy C. Wingo, 5PDC Chair r. Ed Kol~inke, Sr. 5prving Allegheny Cnw~ty, B~t~ttaurt County, tlprrnn i~prge, Covington, Craig Ca~,nty, R4anoAC t,ilY, Kuun~ke Coursty, tiatNm, anal the T'awn of Vin#vn TOTAL P . X71 01-26-1995 09~34AM FROM Ed Kohinke Catawba Spvsr TO Supervisors P.02/03 ED KUHINKE~ 5913 Bradshaw Road Salem, Virginia 24153 1703) 384-$Q13 ~~ OR vpiCir) January 26, 1995 To: Wendy Wingo Wayne Strickland My apologies, but once again I will have to miss a meeting, this time because of a bad cold and hoarseness. Also, I note that my term expires this year on June 3g, and Z am giving serious consideration to stepping down from the SPDC. As a commissioner, I feel that I have done absolutely nothing worthwhile in that role for the past three years. My style is just the opposite: when I belong to an organ- i~ation, I want to support it artd play an active role in it, or get out of it altogether. I would appreciate anp feedback you or the commissioners map have for me on this subject: if I could feel useful, I Would gladly stay on for another term. Thanks! CC: SPDC Commissioners CG' ~-GG' ~ r `\ ~_. ,, ~.~ ~ b ~.> 'J ` o' '~ COUNTY OF ROANOKE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 772-2069 MEMORANDU M TO: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator FROM: Timothy W. Gubala, Director '~ DATE: April 21, 1995 SUBJECT: Rezoning study I gave a report to the Industrial Development Authority on the status of the rezoning study and my recommendations for implementation. I would like to give the report at the May 9, 1995 meeting and ask the Board to: 1) approve an ordinance authorizing the rezoning of the parcels and amendments to the 1985 Comprehensive Plan noted in the study; 2) authorize the Industrial Development Authority to act as its agent to handle the rezoning process. This meeting date would allow time to finalize the list of parcels and file necessary legal documents with the Planning and Zoning Department so that a public hearing could be scheduled with the Planning Commission in July 1995. Please advise. Thank you. Attachment ? i r» - ~~...~/ scud d •~ ~ ~ .5"~~- ~ ecf'.%~ I ~ h a. I O~ AOANp,~-~ z~ ~ ~ IDA J d re3a Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia •~ MEMORANDUM TO: Chairman and Members Industrial Development Authority FROM: Tim Gubala, Secretary/Treasurer DATE: April 20, 1995 SUBJECT: Rezoning Study Charles R. Saul, Chairman (703) 985-2623 Timothy W. Gubala, Secretary (703) 772-2069 Edward A. Natt, Counsel (703) 774-1197 I have been conducting a rezoning study at the request of the Board of Supervisors and County Administrator. This study was authorized to evaluate vacant land having commercial and industrial potential within Roanoke County. There are numerous tracts/parcels that were rezoned to various agricultural or residential zoning districts on January 1, 1993. I am of the opinion that there are 35 - 40 parcels that have commercial and industrial potential that should be rezoned for that use. This action would allow for the planning of extensions of public utilities, improvement of roads, the marketing of these parcels for development and the creation of a "reserve" inventory for development in the future. I will report my findings to the Board of Supervisors in May, 1995. At that time, I will recommend that the Board take several actions to implement this study: 1) Approve an ordinance authorizing the rezoning of the parcels/tracts and amendments to the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. 2) Requesting that the Industrial Development Authority act as "agent" for the Board of Supervisors to file the rezoning applications, present the matter at public hearings and handle associated legal requirements. The Authority is requested to endorse the concept of this study to assist the Board of Supervisors and County in implementing the study recommendations. ees P.O. Box 20068, 1919 Electric Road, Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 774-1197 FAX (703) 774-0961 FIF'E1~F'ESCUE Fa.x~703-5~1-`~`_0~ Mau E '~5 13:12 F.C2.!02 In I deP r~S~ GCHQ of ~ and `~m m ~,y ~ 09 ~ ~~~- Soy'i fire and rescue ~ Chief he was ~g~ncy services t after the flood Hurricane I-Iuga qty. ECH: According to Tommy Fuqua and Keith Cook, Larry Logan is NOT retiring and is not eligible to retire. He is resigning to accept another job. He is just like the rest of us (you and me) who would decide to change jobs. He will draw VRS retirement benefits when he reaches the age where he is eligible. We should not give him a resolution, because many other county employees with n of service leave in similar situations. Why don't we give him one of our new(Ce~ Recognition recognizing his years of service to the citizens of Roanoke County~,,,,_- Mary A. 5/4/95 G 5 -~F,~L A-5995-7.c N. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS Supervisor Edd~(l) Asked about resolution of noise problem at Corrugated Container. ECH advised that they are removing motor from roof. FM advised that Toyce Waugh was following up on problem. (2) Asked about ordinance that will provide police department authority over certain zoning violations related to parking. ECH reported staff is still reviewing and will bring back on 5/23/95. (3) Asked about Organ and Tissue Donation Commission. MHA advised that Board response indicated support for going forward with 5 localities with FM sending letter to localities who have not responded. (5) Asked for response to his telephone survey suggestions. AMG advised suggestions have been sent to Martin Research for their opinions. (,~ Asked about ECH memo to Board members suggesting changes to the Citizen Comment procedures. ECH advised there was no consensus so he is making no changes at this time. (7 Expressed that he felt Student Government DaX activities went very well and was impressed with the students. O. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS 1. Mr. George Pierce, 8005 Olsen Road spoke regarding the requirement to install an 8" sewer line to his new residence. REQUESTED A CHANGE IN SEWER ORDINANCE BECAUSE HE HAD TO SPEND $17,080 TO GET AN 8" SEWER EXTENSION TO HIS HOUSE. ECH AND COUNTY STAFF WILL MEET WITH MR. PIERCE AND REPORT BACK TO THE BOARD. P. REPORTS BLOT MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE AFTER DISCUSSION OF ITEMS UW 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance io 6 - ~~ f ~:'2" -~-~ a l~. ;~~ ~.,~~ s~ ~'~ ~ ~I "_ Post Office Box 286 I I~ 8 Roanoke, Virginia 24001-2868 t .- F i i ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT FOR COMMUNITY ACTION IN VIRGINIA Program Year 199 -94 Virginia Council Against Poverty Oecem~er I.994 Introduction Community Action Agencies (CAAs) function as an integral part of Virginia's human service delivery system, providing tens of thousands of low income individuals and families each year with opportunities to better their lives. Yet Community Action anti-poverty programs benefit not only the poor, but the economy as well. In addition to helping needy individuals and families, CAAs make a significant positive impact on the economy in two major ways: - First, by enabling the poor to help themselves through educational, employment and counseling programs, Community Action activities stimulate the local economy through an "economic multiplier effect." Personal incomes and employment generated as a result of Community Action programs create increased spending in local busines~;es, which, in turn; leads to a higher level of economic activity and increased tax revenues. This generates demand for mope goods, thereby stimulating manufacturing and delivery into the community fro~~ outside the locality. Second, by attending to residents' needs for emergency assistance and by having a positive affect on participants' ability to play a fully functional role in the life of the community, Community Action saves public tax dollars in welfare and hospitali- zation expenditures, defaults on government home loans, and the costs of incarceration in state prisons and local fails. What follows is a conservative estimate of the total economic impact of CAAs across the State during our last program year. We believe these figures conclusively demonstrate that.. Community Action programs make a vital contribution to the economy of Virginia localities, and that funds allocated for Community Action are, in fact, an investment in the health and prosperity of our communities and our Commonwealth. ESTIMATED LOCAL ECONOMIC ACTIVITY GENERATED BY COMMUNITY ACTION IN VIRGINIA - 1993-94 A. EMPLOYMENT Acquisition of employability skills, occupational training and critical support services is the key to sustained unsubsidized employment and self- sufficiency. During this year, the Virginia network of Community Action Programs provided training for 4,519 unemployed people, placed 7,503 participants in unsubsidized jobs, and assisted 529 families to move from welfare to employment by providing critical support services. Direct Client Income 1. 1,446 youth between the ages of 16 and 21 years participated in the Summer Youth Employment Program. Program records show these young people earned: - $1,275,795 2 . 1, 991 parents of Head Start and Day Care children were able to work because of full time child care programs. Assuming each parent worked at least 9 months @ an average monthly wage of $737, they earned: $13,206,303 Local Economic Activity) $1,II49,903 $19,149,139 Income to Local Governments2 $184,990 $1,914,914 1 The Economic income multiplier has an estimated value of 2 (1.45 nor entry level jobs). That is, salaries "turn over" two times in local economic activity. 2 U. S. Chamber of Commerce estimates that local governments receive ten percent of the salary "turn over" figure in utility, sales and real estate taxes. Page - 2 Direct Client Local Economic Income to Local Income Activity Governments 6. 737 ex-offenders partici- pating in readjustment programs were placed in non-subsidized jobs at an average monthly wage of $832. Assume each participant worked for 6 months, they earned: $3,679,104 $7,358,208 $735,821 7. 670 participants in Community Sentencing and Diversion Programs were able to continue their employment. At the monthly minimum wage of $737, and assuming each partici- pant worked for 6 months, they earned: $2,962,740 $5,925,480 $592,548 8. 108 participarits in alcohol/substance abuse counseling and education programs who were not . ' employed when they entered the program, after counseling and a period of sobriety, found a job. Assuming each worked 3 months, @ $832 per month, trey earned: $269,568 $539,136 $53,914 9. 70 participants in the alcohol/substance abuse counseling and education programs who were employed when they entered the program, through treatment, were able to maintain their employment. Assuming each continued to work at least 4 months, @ $832 per month, they earned: $232,960 $465,920 $46,592 Page - 4 Other Benefits From Employment Programs: Direct Client Local Economic Income Activity 1. 1,206 participants in the Summer Youth Employment Program returned to local public secondary schools. The average state reimbursement, is $2,566 per pupil Assuming 95~ (1,145) of the participants remain in school all year, localities will receive: 2. 585 youth and adults received vocational training through CAA. job training programs. Assuming that 50~ (293) will earn at least $3,000 more per year because of their further education, and will work at least 6 months at that additional income level, they will earn additionally, because of CAA interventions: $439,500 $879,000 Income to Local Governments $2,938,070 $87 , 900 Page - 6 Direct Client Local Economic Income to Local Income Activity Governments 3. 493 houses were saved from foreclosure. Retention of these houses by the existing homeowners assured continued tax revenues from local property taxes. The average value of the houses saved was $58,240. Applying the average property tax rate of $ .93 per $100, revenue generated was: $267,025 4. 579 subsidized units, (Section 8) providing shelter to 1,609 low- income people, were administered by local ' CAAs. The subsidy generated $1,463,275 annual income for landlords and payment by renters of $451,620 resulted in approximately: $3,829,790 $382,979 5. 967 families found rental housing to shelter 2,901 people through the efforts of local CAAs. These families paid an average unsubsidized rent of $492 per month, which resulted in approximately: $11,418,336 $1,141,834 Page - 8 E. OTHER INCOME Direct Client Income 1. 80 elderly homeowners were assisted by CAAs in applying for HECMs (Home Equity Conversion Mortgages). At an average award of $32,000 each, the disposable income of these households was increased by: $2,560,000 Local Economic Activity $5,120,000 Income to Local Governments $512,000 Page - 10 SAVINGS IN WELFARE EXPENDITURES AND EMERGENCY PAYMENTS BY WELFARE Savings in Public Expenditures (Federal/State) 1. 450 parents of Head Start and Day Care children were enabled through the provision of child care services to leave the welfare rolls and obtain non- subsidized employment. Upon becoming employed, these parents avoided additional welfare pay- ments for at least 6 months per family, saving.an average AFDC payment of $260 per month. $702,000 2. 179 families of left the welfare families avoided welfare payments four months per an average AFDC $260/month, or: ex-offenders rolls. These additional for at yeast family, saving payment of $82,160 Additional Savings To Local Gov't (Admin. Costs) $140,400 $16,432 3Administrative overhead cost to the locality is conservatively estimated at 20~ of the cost of the client benefit. Page - 12 Savings in Public Additional Savings Expenditures To Local Gov't (Federal/State) (Admin. Costs) c. 2,635 households containing 6,388 people received emergency funds to pay their rents, substantially reducing the incidence among the group of forced relocat- ion, eviction or continued homelessness, Emergency fund request from welfare @ an average of $251 would otherwise have cost: $661,385 $132,277 d. 2,688 people received medical assistance through direct payments to doctors, hospi- tals, pharmacists, opthal- mologists, dentists, etc. Although all households were low-income, assume that 1/2 of these _(1,344) people would otherwise have had to rely on State/Local Hospital rund payments of 2,688 inpatient days @ $344 per day and 672 outpatient @ an average of $40 per patient, saving: $951,552 9,124 additional households received emergency assistance for which savings cannot be determined. 4. 1,357 low-income homes were weatherized saving an average of 30~ per year on fue~ bills. At least 20~ of t?rese households (271) avoided fue~ assistance -requests to the 4~elfare department (average $179) saving: $48,509 $9.702 SUBTOTAL - Savings in Welfare & Welfare-Related Payments: $4,479,877 $705,665 Page - 14 SAVINGS TO EDUCATION Savings in Public Additional Savings Expenditures To Local Gov't (Federal/State) (Admin. Costs) 1. An estimated 50~ (3,721) of the 7,442 children enrolled in Head Start will be able through the program's educational, nutritional and medical benefits to avoid Special Education @ an additional $4,089 per year per child, and go into regular classrooms. Savings in their first year: $15,215,169 $3,043,034 2. 976 handicapped children receiving special services in the Head Start Program avoid enrollment in the public school preschool handicapped _program (@ an estimated $3,500 per child per year) saving: $3,416,000 $683,000 3. 50$ (1,232) of the 2,465 _ adolescents enrolled in CAA tutoring and alt^rnative education programs increased their academic competencies and remained in school. These students remained on attendance rolls, reducing the potential for loss to the locality of state education funds ($2,566 per student per year) by: $3,161,312 4. 99.6$ (2,370) of the 2,380 students in Project Discovery were encouraged and supported to remain in school. These students remained on attendance rolls, reducing the potential loss to the locality of state education funds by: $6,081,420 ~, Page - 16 Savings in Public Additional Saving Expenditures To Local Gov't (Federal/State) (Admin. Costs) ~r. 3,508 individuals received medical screening and/or treatment through CAA sponsored free medical and dental clinics, health screening stations, and free and reduced physician plans. Records suggest that 25$ of the clients (877) avoided a hospital stay because of early diagnosis and treatment. Assuming 80~ would have been '~Sedicare/Medicaid eligible (average $4,571/hospitalization) the savings from missed hospitalizations were: $3,208,842 $641,768 ~. 95~ (1,890) of the 1,993 elderly participants in CAA Companion/ C;:ore Services and similar orocrams were able to remain _.. - eir homes and avoided placement in a nursing home ?r o.:~e for adults . Therefore, then avoided Auxiliary Grant ~a :~,:.ents ( at an average $2,556 per year) of: $4,830,840 $966,168 ~. 4,202 ch~ldren recei~,~ed ~o:~prc::er.sive :east care t..rouch Co::~:nu.^._ =~ct_on s ,.,:~.prehens~ve ea~~.. ~n~~est- :~e.^.t ?rogram ( CHi? ) and '~edica~ Care `or Children ?roj ect ( MCC?) . Assu:;ing that preventive _ care and early :r,edical ~.:ter.~er,~yons pre~.~ented ::ospitalization of 10$ (420 children), savings to Medicaid (at $4,571/ :;ospi~al stay) equalled: $1,919,820 $383,964 Page - 18 4^ RECAP OF PUBLIC SAVINGS AND ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD SAVED BY LOCALITIES: Savings in Public Additional Savings Expenditures To Local Gov't (Federal/State) (Admin. Costs) 1. Savings in Welfare and Emergency Payments 2. Savings on Defaults and Evictions 3. Savings to Education 4. Savings in Medicaid/Medicare and other Health Programs 5. Savings of Arrest, .7ai1 & Prison Stays TOTAL PUBLIC SAVINGS AND ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD SAVED BY LOCALITIES: $4,479,877 $705,665 $507,600 $134,039 $18,631,169 $12,968,966 $22,068,081 $4,413,615 $1,409,052 $3,658,610 $47,095,779 $21,880,895 Page - 20 ~~~ T i ~ TA , ,~C . ION AGAI~1 i RTY IN ROANOKE VALL j ECONbI~y11 T STATEMENT ~~~ 1 'I I 1 9 9 3 I. Jobs, Income cvn ~~ mic Activ~ty ~ cal Taxes Generated by T/ Jobs G, ~n I rat for Client Summ r out ~~ l 2 4 0 Empfo rn nt raining S~ ~ e ~ 1 01 Other ~ ' 3 4 3 Jobs air~ I tain 'd through i tervention 155 Direct lie x In ome ~I S 3 , 5 8';~ TAPE pl y~ee Income: ' II S 3 , 4 3',, p ', ~ Local co dm c Activity': I ', S 1 4 , i 8 Estima ed Lqc I Tax Revlen I : I, S 1 , 4 5~, , II. Estimated S~ vin s f om TAP f~r a To the Pu lic i State a,nc~ e e~ ): S 5 , 3 4,', Additio ~a Sav ngs to Lo~C li I i S 1 , 1 1 '~„ TOTAL SA ; I S 6 , 5 6', i ~ The econo s nc i I me mu~ti~li n estimated value of 2 i (11. I jobs). That is, sal Fries "turn ,I r ~ i o times in local econo i~' 2 I The U. S. ha be of Com e c ~~ imates that local govern er~t ~~ the salary ur ave figure irj ti i ~i ales, and real estate to e$ 3 I Administrat veove ,head cot Fu locality is conservatively eS Cev ! o %. '~ ' I ~ { I ~ ~ I I ~~ I I ESTIMATEp '' ~ ~, II~ ' . TOTAL] ACT(pNi I ~ II' { ~ '~ ', EMPLOYMENt ~', I , ~ isition of em I ~ abili sk`' P Y tY to sustained urhsubsi4iized, i rams provided rainin' fpr~~ ~ ~ I s bsidized jobs aihd as~ist~d. ti al support serjrices.', I I J' i I'. ~i ~ I~ ' I I I OLLEES IN TA1P EIVIPI;O'~~~ " ~ I i I ~ ~~~ 0 Summer Youth Em'~plo~ i•ollees (ages 1,4-21) reCei ~ ~ I ~ I d training allowances total i r it ~ 1 8 parents of Held Start an I c ildren were ably to wdrk b~ f I time child care program. I p , rent worked at feast 9 marl ~ ' era a wa a the' earned g g ~ y ~ I~ I ~ 1 6 adults and 32 +~outh were ~I u subsidized emp';loyment up I I ~ f their training i~t Adu~t Sad i ' cupational classroom] train ~ ~ ~~ e average moriti,h~ly rv~ge w' I '~ suming each'pa'rson ~worke ~ ' nths, they earned: 1 8 people partic~'~ipated'I, in e I ' s rvices such as ]!'lob clubs, jo I ! veer exploration and jbb re' I ~ a tivities and were assi$ted i i j n n-subsidized err4ployrrlent. " I ; ~ a erage wage of 5'1789 amd as II I I; ~ ~ ~ I ~ i ' ch worked at least 5 r'noMth I I' '' j i I ~~ I i ~ 4 4 ._ < 1~ i,. f I~ i I' I ~. ~9 F' 4 to 3'. i i ik ''. I;K~GI~~- ~~ iI l ; . I 6 !!I s ~~ (' ~. ch I~ ~ P s ,~ ~~' r~ i dl t ~~ , ~ ICI ~ ~I ~~ ~'I~ 1 ,, ` 'il ~M~'~ li ,i~~ t `~, ~~ ~' ~~~' < <: i i ~~, ~ y !I I ~. ,II ~~li III@61r1~ II IIrY ~EN d1NOkE ' critical ~y. 'i Dui ed ,314 Ifar~ to 13 S1'~~~i ~! j I'. 1, ;~ t~ l S 2 13 ~' i ,~ .~.' ,I ~~ ,I ,~ € ' ' I " "~ ~0 i S7~7j,4iI~'( i I~ I ~! I ' II " I~~ I' ~ I i 's ii,l L °' , ~ I ~~ I I' ~ ~ I II i i I i 'I !,o I ssh ,0~ t ~ ~o~~ nou, i ~i ~ , I~ ; ~ '~I~$ummer Youth Empl~ym~ i ~t~ticipants were placed in at the end of the p~ogr' h ~ average wagefor th'~ese $632 per month. A~ssu' eked at least 5 montF~s, t I i ~Ex-offenders found la~~l subsidized employm nt t bender Program. At a av 832 per month and I~asst~i eked 5 months they ~arnge '~ ' i '. 'participants in Com ur~~t d Diversion Program~we~i ~rtinue their employment. ja ~' rage wage of $737, nd ~5 ~r~icipant worked for ~ m ~y earned: '~ ' Ip I f k ;participants in the AMcoh ~~ram who were not ~mpl, entered the progri~m, a period of sobriety ~ eaG fuming each worked ~ m' i ~~ month, they earned: { ~' ~ ; ~ ~;' participants in .the A'llcoh dram who were empdoye~l tt~red the program, tthrou~~ rye able to maintain t~eirjf~ ~~uming each continue' to1~ ~~~t 4 months C~3 $832!I peal ~~ earned: ~~~! ~I i ~ I ,i~~ ~~ i' 6 ' I=~ ~ j~l~ i'I ~ ~ I ~ i I ~ li !i . ~ ,i i~ I I; ~~ ~I I, ii ,,' ;j , ~I ,' i Iii ,t ~I i m ~~ f ~ ! i '; ''~I 'jl i! ~I~ ~ ~~! ~ ~ I ~ Other ~s ~ ~i rom ~ ~ " ~'~ ~' nit Progr~m~! ~~I. ~ I ~i ! s ~! a ~~ !~ ~, i i~ i I, ! ) ! i I!''`~~ ~~~~ { 1 ~ Local jl! '~j I s ~~ ;~ '! Ij ', II i I I ~,~ ; i ~ , Econy+~m~ ,I I f ,~ ~~ '~ '' A c i t vit ~~ ~ L~ ! 3 I I i i I f ~ 6 ~ xI i "I ~ ~ ~~ 4 artici p pants m the Sum ~! a ,~ Ili ~ ~~ I~ I' ployment returned to loc f ~i j II,'I j ;'',~ ~I: ~ ~j ~~~, e onda sc !; ~ ~ i '''j r ~~ Ii s i ry hoots. The aver t~~ i P ~!, z, , ~ i, I ~I iei~nbursement, (including .-.1 I a ''~ ~ ~ ?'~ ~ ! III ;~ ~ ~ :a~es tax returned to IocaliU~ ~ ~ lion) I II~ i ~~I I ~ ~ , i ~ ; I ~,~s 5463.27 per pupil. Ass I~ ~i ~ '',~I ; i ~ ~ I ~ i ~8) of the participants re i ~ ~ ~ ool a ' ~~~ ~~ ; I ; , ~ I ~ i aIN year, the localities will I ~ y (i I i II e ~ I ~ ~ ~ E I ~ ~~ l I I ~~ ~ ~ i I ~' i~f ~ 1 0 youth and adults receive , ~ ~ I ~ ~~ ~ii ; j!~ ' ~ ~~ I ~ a Wing through TAP job tra;i ~ ~ ms I 'I ~~ ~~ ~ ~ j ~ ~~ i s uming that 50% (51) wil~ ~, ~ ast ~ ~ 1! ,000 more per year beck ~ ~ i ~ . ~I~~ ;, ~l ~ ~ ' ~ ~ i ~ ~I r her education ,and will ~ ~ ~ t I ; I~~ , ;i, ! ~ 's i! ~ ~~i ! ~ II .. onths at that additiona i +~ , rh III ~~ ~ ~ ~.; l i 9 II II ~ r~ugh TAP intervention an :, ~ ~ ~i ' '~' ~~ ~ ~ ~ eiy will earn an additional ~ ~ it i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I ' S 1 5 3 .~ 0 d~ ''I Iai 'i ~~ ~ I~i~ i li I i USING i~~' ~ 1I ~!I ~ ~ `' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ !1 ~, ~' ~ ~ ~~~~~' i !'i I I l i ~ a~,l ~ ~ 3 III a le living arrangement in s~ ,~ ~~ safe ho ~'~~ ~ ~;ndlent upo~ t y~ n s/homeowners, availabili ~ ~ proved~~ I ~~su~,bsidies,i f e wnership loans and suffix' 4~ p rt servi ~~ ~ t ~ ,this year ~ 7 ~han 550 family members! ~ o rema~rh,i ones throw h r in arrears and homeow~ ; ~i , ~!foreclo~t~~l i oiusing reh~bi i ti Wally 250 persons were ~ ~ ~ d and ~~ Ugh', the Tr~n d e .found safe and decent h t ~ h TAP ~ i ~ ~ i , i, I.I I IIRI '~~ III ~ Local i i' ~~ ~ ~. '~ ' I ~ ~ I ;i ~ '. Econo i i ~~ ~ i III i l ! I: ~! a ei ! 'i. i ~~ A ;, ~ ctivi I ouses tivere rehabilitated li ~~ ~! ~' sing programs. Municipal, ~ ~ ~'~ ~ , III i II ~ '~ P i ti ate a rehabilitated house 1 '~ ~I~e ~ i ~ ~,> ~~ I~ ; ~ more years of occupancy ~' III 'i, ~ k~ ~,I ! ~' ~ ICI ~~ ' ~ ~ ' ~ t~te taxes will increase. Th '' ~ ~ ~ j';I ~ . ~ ~ ~ a ~. i~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I r~eased value of houses wa~~i 1'' ; ~ M r ~ ~~ ~ ~ S ~ I ~i I I I ~ ( ~'~ i o erty taxes at an averaged ~ ~ r '~ r~ ~;,',? ~ ~ I ~ 10~ on increased value onlyF ~ , k ,, ~ i ~ I I ~ d~itional tax revenue of: I~ ~ I ij ;~~ ~ ~ ' (i ~ ' ~,i, ~~ "''~ ~~~ ~ III I!~ ~`, ; III ~~ ~ II I !~,~f s .i Ha ~~~~,~ I' ~, < < I~ ~i v ~ ~ i ~ ~ I ~i I ~ ' i 411 ~ ~~iBE, '~' ~ ' III #' I! i I ~ i i'! ! ~ s~;'' li ~ li li 5 ! i~~i i`i r° i N y ~ I' ~~r!I'~ II I;, 'I ~I ~ ~ ~~'~' ~ ` ~ I II I t i ~ iuiii III EI' ~ ; I~ I ' ~~, '6 houses were saved fro e entior of these houses ~ o eowr?ers assured contin ' f r local property taxes. Th i f omen saved was $55,0 t~e average property tax r 1 0, revenue generated w i 4 subsidized units, (Secti h Iter td 175 low-income d iniste~,red through TAP. ~~ e erated $117,184 for la a ment Ilby renters of $2 I ppro~cimately: I °, I' ! '' ',2 Iderly homeowners wer~j dying for HECMs (Home o tgage~). At an average c~, the ,disposable income ~ f jell increase by: ~'~ ~~ it ~.iA PERSONNEL 1 progranns hire profession ~'' riginajlly been low-into t e job epcperience they are II~ to ees ~t TAP. The avera e ~ j ~'~ III ; ~ ~ ICI ~~ ~ ~~~ ~~ I~ 11992, X21 area resident ~ L ~~ loyedl by TAP. This inch I~ ~r~time, I and summer staff ~cdrds sf~ow these employ ~; ~~ ~ l ', I it `: ' I !9 I I ~ I i g ~~ i ~I r '~~I C it Ij ~ I f '., p , ~~ ~ ~~ ;I~ ~~ s, ~ I , I ~ ~ , I ;'~! ~~i i~ ~'i , I, ~ ; ' ! I ',I .717.1. ~~''~ re. I~~II 'Itlr) ' g ~ Iii ' v~rpues I ~i, wallue ~ lfl 0 of h,'~~ ' I I~ I Ili ~i in ~ d 9 ~ ~~ er'~e ~ LEI d~ I ~~ d '' 41~u'ited ~, ii 11 ~ II iin, '~ ~' n~y~rsion ~~ ~~ S~~,ooo , t~s'ehold~ I~~ ^~ ~,~li i . I, i i ~„ ~ f r I, ~ ~ ~ ~~ wl~ I ~ 3 3 ,~ ~: ~ I I ~ ii ~~ ~ ~, ~ i ~'~ i~ ~ I ;!'~~ , ,I I ~ 8 4 ~ ~,i I~ ~~' I it I~~~ ~ i ~, i ~ ~~ ~~ i~ oRession h' ~ led ~rbrkerf ~~I' f ihartici a~ ~+ thr ulgh i e, ranks f lal a dl, par o~ ~ com ~ worker is ~~ it I ~ ~~ I~ ~I ;Local ~1~ j~, II i ~ '~,Ecor~ G ~ i I I III j, i A t ~~ ~ li~~' ~~ I ~ i tl I; i!~tif!n~e, ~ ~~ ~ ~i ~ i I ~~i G~ ~~ t~n~I' ~ 11' ~ I'I I SI~ ~ s,6 , 9 ~I~ lil ,~ I, I I ti I~~~~ ~ •~ P I i !II i ~ ~i ;9 ~I ~~ 8 i ., i ' li I I I ~' '' I j l ~, i, Iii AP OF TOTAL EARNING '~ I irect Employment Servicie ~I then Benefits from Emplp} ~ ' ousing (Economic Activit} i. Irea TAP employees irect Income to Localities ,, 'li, ~' I TAL EARNINGS, LOCO ~ 'CTIVITY, AND TAX IN~c ', !,OVERNMENTS IN THE',1 i ~RVICE AREA: ', ~~ I' ~~il S grams S ~) S S S ~MIC S x"11 ~'~~~~~ 1, ~ 4 ~I~i 'I ~I',~, ~, 9 x~ f zi 8.+ a i !' ~ ~'I l~ ti' i , j ~ IJ ~~~ I ~ ~~ ~_~l ~, i~. ~l "', ~~ '{ ~~ ~ i~,;l N ~~' r! ~i~~ ~~ ~~ `,i ~ i I fi ~~ ~` TOTAL ACTION AGAINST POVERTY IN ROANOKE VALLEY Contents: What If TAP Had Never Been, an editorial by Ted Feinour Program Statistics - 1993-1994 Program Statistics - 1965-1994 TAP Programs - 1994-1995 A Sample of TAP Volunteers 1993 TAP Economic Impact Statement 1994 Virginia Economic Impact Statement Twenty Five Years of TAP 1993 TAP Annual Report Editorial - 12/31!94: Roanoke Times and World News ~ ~~ W S~ ~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~ L, EDITORIALS TAP, tapping away at poverty AN'I;I-poverty efforts and cntrepre- ncurshi~,.may seem an odd mix -but only.ta.those unfamiliar.with Roanokc- bascdtiotal Action Against Poverty. . Gov. 'George Allen, among others, woutil"do well to familiarize himself with its work: Like other, largely •unsung community-action agencies throughout the United States, TAP's job is --has been for going on 30 years - to offer .the poor not a handout but a helping hand ri'p:"Consider, for example, TAP's new "eritrcprencurial class." Nbighborhoocj bakeries, beauty shops,~'d7y-care centers, even a hot-dog stand -these sorts ofsmall businesses keep tlii:"pulse of communities beating ' stroriS;'and offer hope~of resuscitation to faltering ones. They arc the hope, too, of people who dream of owning and operating their own businesses. Many low-income people, contrary perhaps to stereotype, share that dream, but thcy,oftcn lack the knowledge and the capital to get started. TAP is offer- ing alittle of each - a 14-week class and a small loan - to help what is so . far a handful of students take a crack at getting into business. TAP can't guarantee their success. No businessperson starts with that guar- antee. But in typical fashion, the non- profit agency is chiseling away obsta- cles and disadvantages so the people that it can reach -and this is by no mcans•all of tl~e region's poor - at lcashhlve an opportunity to acl on their dreams: • • Unlike government assistance pro- grams ~Slesigncd to give the poor enough cash; fcsdd and housing subsidies to sur- vive;,; TAP's purpose is to get them cnough•education and training to get a job and:become self supporting: Yet, cven;as;thc Allen administration is pro- posing atwo-year limit on welfare bcn- cfits, the governor's budget amend- ments would eliminate state Commu- nityService Block Grants that, together with federal grants, give community agencies such as TAP their seed mon- ey. The administration needs to recon- sider. TAP uses its government funding as leverage to raise far more in private donations. With toe support of legions of volunteers, it helps provide for edu- cation, employment training, counsel- ' ing, emergency shelter for abused women and other support services that help people become self-sufficient. The well-worn proverb advises that ~ if you give a hungry man a fish, he can cat that day; if you fcach him to fish, he can cat every day. Throughout its pro- ductive 30 years, TAP has worked not only to teach the hungry to fish, but to make sure they have the hook and line needed to do so. Tl~c Allen administration would cut tlic line, then two years later take away the free fish: Breaking the cycle of welfare dependency fostered by government programs is a worthy goal. Success will benefit not only taxpayers, but also those caught up in a system that allows subsistence living but little hope. Suc- cess won't happen, though, without strategies that work. Community action works. It is itself, in many ways, entre- prcncurial. Mixing hard-nosed business with do-good social work? TAP's paid and volunteer workers have for three decades swum in such crosscurrents, playing a vital community role by help- ing people move from dependency to productivity. If we are to have the poor alw~iys with us, let's hope TAP remains right there, too. What If TAP Had Never Been? .. by Ted Feinour 1995 will mark the third decade of Total Action Against Poverty serving individuals and families in the Roanoke Valley. During the Holiday Season, many of us will enjoy the rerun of that Hollywood classic, "It's A Wonderful Life". A local banker faces the destruction of everything he has built and the devastating impact this will have on his family and friends. He wonders about the worth of his life and whether or not he has made any impact on the world. He contemplates suicide, but instead meets an angel who shows him what his family's life would have been like had he not existed. In so many ways, even after 29 years, TAP remains one of the best untold stories in the Roanoke Valley. The TAP story is known best to those whose lives have been touched and changed by TAP opportunities and caring support, while most of the valley residents are not aware of even a portion of the TAP impact on our community. Books on Roanoke's history omit TAP. Too many might assume that there would be little difference in our Valley today if TAP had not been here. If TAP had not been here who would have reached out annually to more than 8,000 low income people to help them towards self-sufficiency through education, health care, decent and affordable hosing and employment. Who would have provided a Head Start experience for 17,000 children, remedial education fo r 4,120 dropouts, and employment training and placement for yet another 11,483 persons? Who would have had the manpower and resources to start Legal Aid, The Southwest Virginia Development Fund, the Blue Ridge Housing and Development Corporation and the Southwest Virginia Second Harvest Food Bank. Who would have listened to the rural residents plea for potable water and indoor plumbing and been able to develop the Virginia Water Project which has brought safe water and waste systems to more than 45,000 households in Virginia? Which organization would have tackled the problem of helping 27,930 former prison inmates start a new crime free life had not TAP developed Virginia CARES? Who would have brought together local colleges and school systems to start Project Discovery r a which has assisted 7,540 low income and minority students to seek post secondary education when college enrollment of these groups were in decline? What would have been the impetus for bringing together the Health Department and Private physicians to begin the Comprehensive Health Investment Program which has now served 2,097 children in the Roanoke Valley with primary care services. What would the 1,600 homeless persons served by the Transitional Living Center have done if TAP had not existed? Where would they have gone and where would they be now? Which organization would have filled the gap and started services that assisted 6,400 abused women and children had not TAP begun the Valley's first Women's Center? To whom would these desperate families have turned? For sure there would be no Henry Street Music Center and less hope for a revitalized Henry Street. The Harrison School would surely have been bulldozed and the Harrison Museum for African American Culture would not exist, nor the annual Henry Street festival enjoyed by ten's of thousands. each year. There would still be drug dealers and pushers dominating the 19th and Melrose shopping Center instead of a neighborhood grocery, pharmacy and retail store. In all likelihood, Roanoke would not be know today for the level of networking and interagency cooperation had TAP not been here. The nature of this local, private agency is to network, to build bridges, to coordinate and cooperate, to make a difference for those who can not do so with their one voice alone. Its public-private partners include local banks, the Department of Social Services, churches, the Fifth District Employment and Training Consortium, local governments and their various departments, and state department affiliations such as Education, Health, Housing and Community Development, Criminal Justice Services.... Roanoke has been known for its positive level of race relations. Due credit is frequently given area leaders during desegregation. But, what if TAP had not been there to conduct human relations training with youngsters in the schools during the desegregation process? If TAP had not organized low income and minority communities to address their concerns with words rather than actions? If TAP had not been there as a model equal opportunity employer? f • r Over 29 years TAP has brought more than $200 million into the Roanoke economy to help provide opportunities for low income citizens. More than twenty percent of those resources went into the pockets of participants as training stipends and wages. Forty percent went to area vendors to purchase vehicles, office equipment, building supplies and more. That S80 million dollars provided $160 million dollars of economic activity in the Valley. What would the difference of subtracting that amount of economic activity meant for the entire community? Who would have paid for the multi million dollars in cost savings by helping people stand on their own two feet and take charge of their own lives? As we look toward 1995, it is important that TAP be kept on the area agenda. It is important that the Community Service Block Grant which provides TAP's actual core funding be protected. These critical dollars amounting to approximately 5650,000 a year are then leveraged by TAP into a ten million dollar budget. It is important that we all seek to support TAP as well with our dollars, out time and our prayers. Welfare Reform is on the top of the agenda for 1995. Welfare reform means equipping families to earn their own way and become productive, tax-paying citizens. That has been TAP's primary goal through three decades. TAP is and always has been Welfare Reform. That has been and will continue to be TAP's Contract with the Roanoke Valley. Living in the Roanoke Valley for most of us is a wonderful life. That wonderful life is in no small way been the result of TAP's impact on the eleven jurisdictions in this Southwest Virginia service area. YY ~ ~i s i I, ~M~ III ~! i ~ ~~ i' i ~ (... ~4 ~ ~ ~ ',, I ~ ~~t~~ 'ti€~n ~~ s y ~, ~ i t~ ~I ° it art: ~ ~ ~ ` ~ I 1 i; i ~ ( ~~ I~ !I !~ ensi~~ ~ ~ ~ In'~,v; ~t~ne t I iI ' i 11 ~ ~ i~ Y ~# Youth ~ !rripll;~ ~~k~Meln~ ,li ro r ~~~~ I g G ~,i Dls~~ ~ ~~ ~ ' ' ~ i , ~i i Iii ~ I I ~ ; , ~ Edu~~ i' i~ ;a~ I~IIo'Ilp; ',~~t limin~ti~,n~ ~'' (' ~~ ~ f ,. - B' ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ' i ~ ~ ~ I~, II EduC~~lb~n ~C)jev~ lalp ~aj~t C al ~d ~ tl¢rti: ~ '~ ~ II ~, III IzatMd~'~~ ~~ III ~ ( I ~B I ~ ( I 'i. l: 7 I I~I ~ tion ~ I ~e{~~3r~j ~ ~ i ~~~ ~ ~ I E Iii! } IP ~M ,~a'~~ II II ~ '~~al C ~, ~, ; ~ II' ~ ~ ~ f ~, ~~ ~11 ~~ a yy I ~ ~~ I ~~; ~ ~',~ ~' I ~~ ~~ ,I n r ~ ES '11~/~~, ©~~ ~ , ~~ d.er ~i fF~ dl~u~~ ~~iing:~~ ~~ I~ ~; ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ I I, ~~ Re~pu' ~ dell tern ~~ ~~ I I 3 anal ~ Il~yi !ng:i 'n~~ ;: ; ' i~ ~ ~ I ~', i, ~ C st Vbl 'Ico~aC ar,~v~ ~ ~ Fo c II y I~ ~ Ilj ~' ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~~ !~ ' ~ jii ~ ~~ ~~~ ' ' ~ ~l ~ ~ t 3 ''. i ~~ 3 i , I 4 i I'. A' 7 ~ i 1 III i I '~ III ~ I + ~I 'I ! ~ ~ ~ u I i R ~ i ~ ~ i ~ i, is i ~' ~: ~I l a , I i~ ~~ ~~. yI '~I~ ~ ~ ~~I b~ is t ' ~ I ~ PIS ~OII~~~~ ~ _,'~ '1 ~, ; , ~ i 41 ~ ~ (~ I ~ ~~. II ~~II :; I ` it i '~cil ~I lit, 5I'I p r I I &!) t.l ~I ~i~~~0~7 ~~ €I i~l p I~ }€ ''~ ~ ~ O ~I yo t wpp, II ~ ~ ~`~,I I 1 I Ills I yo kth chil~h ad Ikfi' e~~ Twenty Five Years of TAP 1965 -1990 ~~ . ..,~, ~. ,. ~l'i x rr:~ ::~: ~.y.~ ~, . ~ti~,~; b ;, -> ~. ;tt_ .. ~ << .. Y'. ~h~~ 'A ~~ ~c~~~~ ®~ ~~I~ ~~~~ ~ ~1~~® Responding to President Johnson's plea for a national War on Poverty, Congress passed the Economic Opportunity Act in 1964..."to eliminate the paradox of poverty in the midst of plenty... by opening to everyone the opportunity to live in decency and dignity." New programs under the Act, administered by the Office ofEconomic Opportu- nity (OEO), included Job Corps, Neighborhood Youth Corps, Work-Study Pro- grams, Head Start, Legal Services, and locally organized and controlled Commu- nity Action Agencies (CAAs) that would operate these federal programs and initiate local programs also. In Roanoke, the Council of Community Services created a study committee- headed by.Cabell Brand of Salem - to plan a CAA for the Roanoke Valley. The Committee found that poverty was indeed a significant problem; that its causation and continuance were due to many factors; and that only a broad based attack on these many poverty factors could make a significant impact. From these decisions came TOTAL ACTION AGAINSTPOVERTY IN ROANOKE VALLEY, chartered on Apri129,1965, as the official poverty agency for Roanoke, Roanoke County (then including Salem), and Bedford and Botetourt Counties. In the past 25 years, thousands of poor children, youths, adults, and senior citizens have had their lives directly affected for the better. Countless non-poor have had their eyes opened to the needs and barriers keeping poor people poor. Local social services have been profoundly affected both in availability of new services and in the attitude toward those needing the services. Because words alone can't describe the impact of 25 years of TAP, we have in- cludedfigures and numbers to clarify the differenceTAP has made in people's lives. -But numbers don't tell the whole story either, so there is ayear-by-year narrative that attempts to fit into a small space the enormous variety ofactivities- services, community organization, advocacy, starting of new agencies, cooperative efforts -performed by TAP for the Roanoke Valley over the past 25 years. 1 9 6 5 NEW HEAD START PROGRAM FIRST SUCCESS OF "WAR ON POVERTY" May: Bank of Virginia donated the use of the old Lindsey -Robinson mill for TAP's headquarters. TAP requested $65,000 for an initial planning grant. A 100- memberCitizens Advisory Group researched possibleprogramming directions for the new antipoverty agency. - - August: Bristow Hardin hired as new Executive Director, with a small develop- ment staff. They conducted an areawide needs assessment. October: Administrative offices opened and the first program, Loudon Head Start Center, began with space for 105 preschoolers, and SQchildren forafter-school - care. December: TAP asked OEO for $2.7 million and received $2? million, foi- a full rangeofantipovertyactivities: homemaking, birth control,familycounseline~,full- ;w:. ~..:.- were installed in Roanoke and Roanoke County. TAP assisted low-income women who had joined together for self-help child care and created nine Mothers' Clubs. Cooperative efforts with churches included Roanoke's first Halfway House for male alcoholics, ~ ith the Episcopal and the Presbyterian Churches, and the Southeast Commuciity Center with the Presbyterians. Other joint ventures were the Task Force on Employmentand a VolunteerAdvisor Corps for job counseling. Sargent Shiver, national OEO director, visited TAP in May to dedicate the opening of Victory Stadium for OIC job training. Three years after passage of the EOA, local governments were complaining that they had no way to control these CAAs, some of which were making very radical noises. In response, Congress passed the "Green Amendment" to the Act, giving local accountability and some control by requiring that one-third of each CAA's Board consist of local elected officials or theirdesignees, and that each locality name their official CAA. 1 9 6 8 KING ASSASSINATED; VIETNAM WAR COSTLY IN MONEY, LIVES Carrying out the Green Amendment, TAP was officially designated by Roanoke, Salem, Lexington, Buena Vista, and by Rockbridge, Botetourt, and Roanoke Coun- ties. TAP also continued to serve Bedford residents by permissior; of OEO. TAP built three small pools in Roanoke, operating them for two years before giving them to the city. With the city schools, TAP co-produced Operation Insight on WBRA-TV to prepare the public for school desegregation. Housing and related needs had become evident; TAP helped low-income j~~ families apply for over $3 million in home loans, primarily from Farmers Home; started the Community Housing Corporation with the Swartz donation of inner .' city properties valued at $241,000; and began Demonstration Water Project, a ,,; national model to show how poor families could obtain affordable and healthy 1r. water. TAP created an independent non-profit agency, Southwest Virginia Commu- nityDevelopment Fund, to specialize in economic development: Community organizers led "Now Us" members -needing to express their rage after Martin Luther King's assassination - to give blood instead of shedding i t, at the Red Cross. 9 6 9 HURRICANE CAMILLE SWEEPS AREA A prepaid dentistry program began for Head Start children, the first such prepaid program in Virginia. TAP funded Roanoke Valley Council of Community Services' first directory of local services. Craig County joined TAP's service area: TAP performed ahouse-to-house survey of unemployment in Craig County for the VEC. Operati .;Mainstream Manpower programs: New Careers, 95 enrollees; Operation Mainstream, 77 NYC: 95 out-of-school, 430 summer, 175 in-school. Mothers' Clubs: 180 children GED diplomas obtained by enrollees: 69 Community center/ block clubs: over 9,000 persons actively participated since 1966; thousands of youths served by recreation, tutoring, dances, and other activities. Homemaker program since-1966: 3,120 persons in 929 fami- lies (spun off this year) Credit Union: 180 mem- bers Head Start. Head Start psychologist, Phyllis Olin, devised a unique language TAP's FIRST FIVE stimulation program using volunteers and suitcases full of toys, to draw out non- YEARS SA W: verbal children. Head Start: 5,563 chil- dren, Summer program; 1,225 children, full-year 1 9 7 1 ECONOMY PLAGUED BY RECESSION AND program job training: 7,469 INFLATION persons of whom: Summer & Ir:-school Alcohol counseling services began with a counseling center near downtown NYC: 3,783 youths Roanoke. A Fine Arts division opened initially to encourage sales of Appala- OIC: 2,655 persons, of Chian folk crafts. Industry Bound was a first attempt to place youths in private whom 765 went to jobs for 10-week stints. better jobs New Careers: 227 para- The Federal Housing Administration designated TAP as an FHA credit coun- Professionals seling center, to assist low-income families to buy homes under the FHA 235-237 Operation Mainstream: program: With other community agencies, TAP helped start the Area Man- 299 older adults power Planning Council and Virginia's first IV-C (Community Coordinated Legal Aid: 5,373 persons Child Care) group. served Family Planning: 3,239 TAP continued to delegate successful programs. Family planning was trans- Persons served ferred to the new Planned Parenthood chapter as a delegate agency, having 15 Senior Citizens clubs: served 2,496 persons since 1966. Funds for senior citizens' services were dole- over, 1,400 members gated to RVCCS and to the Fifth Planning District staff,. to develop volunteer 14 youth groups: 319 services and seek funds for more services to the elderly. members 87 active block groups OIC began to receive funds directly from its national office instead of through organized: over TAP; Bedford County left TAP's service area to join the Lynchburg CAA. 9,000 active members participated OEO's new director Frank Carlucci visited TAP "to keep in touch" with com- munityaction in the field. TAP's first-and-only Board president, Cabell Brand, was again named to represent Roanoke County and Salem after citizens de- manded that Salem Council reverse its initial opposition to his reappointment. • A Job Development, Recruitment; and Placement Service began as a special- ized employment agency for the poor. TAP helped Roanoke City move its Commodity Food Distribution Center to a more accessible location. Trainers conducted student rap sessions and teacher training at William Fleming High FIiA and Fm HA home School to reduce racial tensions there. loans approved$966,000 The Community Housing Corporation prepared an ambitious proposal to the Monthly caseloads: Cen- eral Outreach, 500+ new _ Federal Housing Administration: $3S million, to construct 176 housing units in clients; Legal Aid, 200+ Roanoke City. (There was initial approval, but it was finally turned down after ~~ new cases two years of negotiations) Head Start medical • services: 590 physical exams, 397 dental 1 9 7 2 NIXON RE-ELECTED. BY A LANDSLIDE VOTE screenings, 390 immuni-~ nations, 109 psychologi- cally rested • .Evans Products donated Moore's Store building on Shenandoah Avenue to TAP. Senior Citizens Adt,isory The Community Housing Corporation built and.sold IS homes under the FHA 235 Council: 2,430 me»rbers; program. - 1,612 rides given New Careers (since 1967): TAP worked with RVCCS and the Fifth Planning District staff, providing the im- 79 enrollees passed GED petusand technical support to establish the League of•O1derAmericans. With the exam Senior Citizens Advisory Council, TAP lobbied successfully to have. Melrose _,~ .T-x ~- ,.~ r ,-~ apply for benefits, held Summer Day Care for 80 welfare children, and opened the Human Services training Detoxification/Alcohol Counseling Center at the old Moore's Store on Shenan- workshops: 50 doah Avenue. (The Detox Center was, and is, a program of Mental Health Services, Alcohol counseling to which works closely with TAP on alcoholism services.) Child Program Board was date: 389 clients creNted as a separate agency to operate group foster homes for adolescents. Senior Citizens Advisory Council: held 136 meetings, provided 5,233 trips and 8,207 1 9 7 4 WATERGATE BRINGS DOWN PRESIDENT services; had 26 NIXON volunteers President Nixon was now too deeply absorbed in his Watergate troubles to keep attacking Community Action, especially in light of its surprisingly strong support by local governments and in Congress. TAP staff began to give their own money towards a lobbying effort to keep OEO alive -and still do. Seeing a clear need for local support, TAP began a monthly Newsletter again. Thirty VISTAS were employed in various positions. TAP helped start a Roanoke Valley Food for People Task Force and the Virginia Coalition on Nutrition, and "loaned" fouroutreach workers to the League of Older Americans to recruitelderly persons for Diners' Clubs. Homes winterized: 175 Other anti-hunger efforts included giving almost $4,000 to the Fcoanoke Welfare Alternative Education: 780 students Department for food vouchers needed during the changeover from commodity Manpower programs foods to food stamps; taking Food Stamp applications to speed up approvals; and since 1966: working with local churches to open Food Pantries. New Careers: 559 para- ProjectEnergySave,begunwithJaycees,wasVirginia'sfirsthomewinterization professional s (63% placed in jobs), also program and one of the nation's earliest, long before any national energy conser- job counseling and vation mandate. The current Weatherization program has now completed over placement services to 5,000 homes. 644 persons The Human Services component brought Dr. Harold Greenwald, author of Operation Mainstream: 992 persons (57% placed Direct Decision Theravy to Roanoke to share his belief about the individual's in jobs); 19% illiterate power to shape his life through his decisions. He spoke to drug addicts at Hegira on entering, only 2.5 % House, prisoners at Camp 25, and residents at Catawba Hospital. when leaving program. Over 9,000 Roanoke City youths responded to a survey about their recreational Neighborhood Youth Corps: Summer, approx. needs, and youth programming really took off: E.~.rn and Learn, Rent-A=Kid, 4, 674; InSchool, approx. dramaintheparks,freemovies,RecreationandTransportation,andtutoringwere 1,065; Out-of-School,ap- summerprojects. Year round recreation~programsbegan,andLatch-Key,forafter- prox. 900. In-school and school care, was staffed by VISTAS at three housing projects. Summer dropout rates This was a turning point for manpower programs. In October the new Compre- only 2% and 0.5%, compared to 9-10°!o rate hensive Employment and Training Act (CETA) went into effect, -replacing all . for target area categorical manpower programs. TAP contracted with the new Manpower Con-~ CETA Outreach (first 3 sortium to perform Work Experience, Counseling and Outreach. months): 704 persons contacted 1 9 7 5 CONGRESS CHANGES "OEO" TO "CSA" Twoyears of anxiety over OEO's future were resolved in January by the Act ere- ating the Community Services Admiriistration. The Act also required CAAs to raise more local share: 30¢ for each 70¢ from C'SA. This need led TAP again to request cash from local governments, that year and since. The positive responses 1 9 7 6 JIMMY CARTER DEFEATS PRESIDENT GERALD FORD Youth Services began Coordinated Youth Services, Wilderness Challenge, and sponsored Hurt Park School's Community Education program. Its director, Jayne Thomas, became the host of a weekly TV show, Minority View, on WBDJ. Offender Programs started Stop-Gap Jobs (three month employment cycles offering counseling and job search aid), the Storefront, and Prison Families Anonymous, and Botetourt County's Camp 25 began artsand crafts, GED tutoring, and a still continuing Monday night self-awareness group. Food Buying Clubs: The Board made 1976-1977 TAP's year to emphasize health-related concerns of five the poor; one concern was addressed by the Fire and Burn Prevention project. Con- Emergency Fuel Sumer Education began, offering workshops and individual assistance to low- Assistance: $9,728 to income consumers. Home Start went into Alleghany County. over 450 families Cash Grants from Of about 300 families who had been assisted by Housing Counseling in the past local governments: 18 months, only 10 had their homes foreclosed. TAP's own "house" ~n Shenandoah FY 75-76 $60,083 Avenue needed attention, and was now filled with hammering, sawdust, and tem- FY 90-91$199,740 porarily displaced staff as the first phase of a major building renovation got under way -required for compliance with building and fire safety codes. Legal Aid moved out to its own building in downtown Roanoke. TAP trainers received national publicity for their unique workshop, Life Plan- ning for the Elderly. A staff member in Rockbridge County got another kind of publicity when she and her family were featured as a working-class Americar, family in a Bicentennial documentary produced by the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. Publicity forTAP included a TV documentary,'"TAP Plus Ten;' pro- duced by WDBJ, and a feature story on TAP in Ebony magazine. The Board evaluated all of TAP'S components and found them all in good shape. Area support and refunding teams were activated to generate the support of local governments. TAP requested $115,000 in cash from the local governments to try to meet CSA's local share requirements. The request wereaccompanied bya Planning Department innovation: Cost-Benefit Analyses of the effects of TAP'S programs for each local economy. Another innovation was a computerized Client Participa- tionsystemforcountingandreportingonalldients.TAPpublishe,. anew colorful Annual-Report and phased out its Newsletter 1 9 7 7 COLDEST WINTER IN U.S. HISTORY HITS n POOR, ELDERLY AS FUEL COSTS RISE TAP had its first Youth Summer Feeding program and operated the Hurt Paik swimming pool for Roanoke City. A successful grant request was written for Mill Mountain Playhouse to bring drama workshops into Virginia prisons -the Wings project. Wings has won special recognition by Project CULTUI:? as one of the leading prison arts projects in the nation. Self-awareness groups began again for Roanoke City and Salem jail prisoners. _ CSA funded a rural transportation project in Botetourt, Craig and Alleghany Counties. Outreach workers recruited low-income mothers for the new WIC (Womens, Infants, Childrerti) feeaing Program in koanoke. The whole staff coop- erated to enroll over 700 persons in a demonstration Prepaid Legal Insurance Scholarship C'learinghouse,helping low-income youths to apply for grants-in-aid for higher education. 1 9 7 8 PROP. 13 SPARKS NATIONAL TAX REVOLT, ENDANGER SERVICES New programs prolifera ted: Youth employment programs known by their initials (YETP, YCCIP, SVCDF/YCCIP), a Youth Activity Center (there are now three), programming in Botetourt and Craig Counties for rural youths, a second year of Summer Feeding. TAP's new rural emphasis included a new Manager for the Al- leghanyarea office and a Rural Planner. Two statewide programs aimed at helping inmates successfully re-enter society were begun in cooperation with the Virginia Association of Community Action Agencies (VAC.'.A). Inmate Career Development was operated by TAP and two other CAAs in eleven of V irginia's penal institutions, together with the Virginia Em- ployment Commission. A Planning Grant of $106,000 funded work with atl 26 CAAs in Virginia to create a model statewide re-entry program that would reduce recidivism rates. Wings was refunded with the assistance of small grants from the Best Products Foundation and the Virginia Department of Corrections. With local helping organizations, TAP staff organized the distribution of Christ- mas toys to 5,000 children. TAP signed the state's first housing counseling contract with FmHA. In cooperation with LightWorks of Lexington and with a donated design by architect Lee Merrill, TAP began building a passive solar greenhouse on alow-income elderly women's home to demonstrate its feasibility and usefulness. TAP staff and Board members became strongly involved in battling the politics of poverty on several fronts. Their efforts led to the retention of Head Start in H.E.W.; maintenance of the highly successful National Demonstration Water Project network; and shifting of CETA funds so that all TAP area PSE.employees would not have to be laid off (TAP had 51, or 15% of its workforce). Another victory was getting the Virginia General Assembly to appropriate (for the first time) $100,000 per year to Virginia WaterProjectand also to VACAA's Weatherization program. To raise "in-kind" donations, the first TAP Gong Show was held. TAP Building renovations were complete for the present; the building wassold by the Bank of Vir- ginia to RVCCS, which gave TAP a five year lease, and it was renamed the Bristow Hardin Building in a touching ceremony. • The former Youth Director, now Director for Community Relations and Resource Development, was appointed to the Roanoke City School Board, and consequently gave up her TV program, Minority View. A Welfare Reform Symposium brought an Assistant Secretary of H.E.W. and other highly placed experts to Roanoke for a lively debate of the Administration's .proposed revamping of the nation's welfare system. TAP's Alternative Education nearly didn't start this.year, when Roanoke's Summer Feeding: 17,070 School Board first said yes, called it maybe, then yes again to funding a reduced pro- »teals served gram. ~ ~ Emergency Fuel: paid _ $231,370 in~fuel bills for 1,669 families answer to the p~:verty problem. Reeling from federal budget cuts which began in 1978 and K Auld continue throughout the Reagan years, TAP began reorganization of its administrative structure. Offender Programs, housing counseling, emergency services and neigh- borhood services were combined into the Community Outreach Component. Women's services, alcohol counseling, and the human services training program became Human Resources. The office of the Executive Director was streamlined. With a three year commitment of $500,000 from CSA and an equal amount from the office of National Programs at the Department of Labor, Virginia CARES Community Action Re-Entry System was officially born on January 1, 1980. In its first year of operation, Virginia CARES served 422 prisoners, over I,000 ex- prisoners and over 500 family members. Alcohol Counseling: 510 Clients Despite funding cuts, great things were happening at TAP. Outreach workers Head Start: 475 chil- assisted the City. of Buena Vista in gathering data for their Communit~~ Develop- dren in 9 centers and ment BIock Grant proposal. Home Start Housing Counseling: TAP's Housing Component began a Housing Rehab Program, assisting low 1.500 Clients (energy income homeowners in Roanoke to help stabilize their neighborhoods ~y bringing conservation, man- their homes up to City Building Code standards. agement, relocation, purchasing or renting The Weatherization Program became the 3rd in the state of Virginia to weather- houses, 420 default ize 1,000 houses, completing a total of 335 units this year. and delinquent mort- gages. Over 2,500 persons participated in workshops through the Human Services Manpower Programs: Training Program. TAP and other service agency staff, as well as senior citizens CETA :735 Clients , youth, ex-offenders, drug abusers and CETA employees came together to learn Work Experience: 114 team building, human interaction, counseling skills, organizational development Clients and life planning, improving both their personal lives and employability through Women's Center: 839 better self-awareness and improved communication skills. Clients Youth Services: TAP's Women's Resource and S°rvices Center sponsored the annual Artemis 2.~ youths Arts festival and workshops, offering a variety of experiences for women and the served in 12 dif - community. More than 1,200 people attended this event. Women's Center staff ferent programs rejoiced at the opening of Mahala -apartments for battered women and their children - a project in which~TAP staff played a major development role. -1 9 8 1 REAGAN SURVIVES ASSASSINATION ATTEMPT Among the first casualties of the Reagan landslide were CSA and he office of . National Programs at the Department of Labor. In a matter of weeks, the three year federal commitment to Virginia CARES was null and void. But the CAAs in the network continued their commitment to fund Virginia CARES for $50,000 till the .network could have a~chance at the next state funding cycle. TAP Community Outreach workers discovered families.in the small community of Iron Gate livingin homes where standing sewage presented an imminent health hazard. ~In order to create a healthy environment for32 families in the community, . TAP took on the state Health Department, commissioned a Virginia ""ech study to define the severity u~ the problem, and advocating for changes in th~~ health ~sta~- ..~~.~~ c. .,i~ f,, ,- . , ., - . tional training. Wh<.ever their choice, students were assured encouragement and assistance in realizing their goals. Further program cuts forced the closing of the Work Experience program in the City of Salem (Programs in Roanoke City, Covington, Clifton Forge, and the counties of Alleghany, Botetourt, Craig and Roanoke remained open.), as well as the moving of the Women's Center from the YWCA into offices in the TAP building. StaffreducHonsincreased TAP`scommitmenttovolunteerdevelopment and to the training and supervision of VISTA workers. Project Discovery, a joint effort of TAP, Roanoke College, and the Roanoke City Schools, had been under development since 1980. During the first 6 months of 1982, Roanoke City high school juniors participated in a demonstration project which involved seminars and workshops covering study skills, college selection, and financial aid. Students visited local colleges, and had their interest and aptitudes computer-matched with potential college choices. In October, the Construction Skills Training Program was established to pro- videstudents with the fundamentals of the building industry. Students received 300 hours of instruction and the hands-on experien~~ of building a model home and of constructing their classroom, cumplete with bookshelves and wall partitions. With the aid of the Food Bank Advisory Board and the TAP Board of Directors, the Southwest Virginia Community Foodbank acquired freezer and cold storage units, thereby enabling them to greatly increase the amount and variety of food items that could be accepted from suppliers. The acquisition of this cold storage space and freezer helped TAP meet the criteria for full membership in the Second Harvest network. 1 9 8 3 U. S. BACKS INVASION OF GRENADA Manpower programs took on a new look with the demise of CETA and its re- placement with JTPA-the JobTraining PartnershipAct. The Youth imployment Training Program a nd Proj ect Recoverycombined to form Proj ect REAP (Roanoke EducationalAltern.itiveProgram). ProjectPRIDEoffered"atrisk"students in the Lexington, Rockbn~ige and Buena Vista schools individualized instruction to help them catch up and mainstream back into the public schools. A new training program began, offering evening classes in Clerical Skills. Aimed at graduating students with the capacity to obtain entry-level clerical employment, the program combined classroom instruction in a comprehensive curriculum of business education and skills with workshops in job seeking and retention. TAP Alcohol Services conducted Alcohol Awareness sessions for 921 high risk youth in 1982-83. In addition the program operated a court referral program fo; youth involved in ~~lcohol -related offenses. Despite serious s~aff reductions, TAP's Housing Counseling Program provded services to 2,078 fa: ulies over a two-year period, with the.help of dedicated volun- teers. Counseling services covered housing-related problems-such as delinquent and default mortgages, landlord-tenant conflicts, pre-purchase/pre-rental consic?- erations, energy conservation and budget maintenance. 1982-83 Head Start: 1,300 Children Alternatiae Education: 1,235 students Adult Basic Educatio~t: 94 students passed their GED tests Offender Programs: 939 clients Human Resources: 2,639 persons coun- seled Housing Services: 517 houses weatherized _. 1 9 8 5 FLOODS MAi~E ROANOKE VALLEY A DISASTER AREA TAP mobilized quickly in response to the devastating "Hundred Year Flood" of November 4,1985 with the establishment of an Emergency Flood Relief Program. Staff and volunteers collected and distributed more than 46,000 pounds of food and rooms full of clothing and supplies to families ravaged by raging floodwaters. An emergency Neighborhood Assistance Project requested by Tr.:' and authorized by the Virginia Department of Social Services enabled TAP to offer area businesses state tax credi is in return for the donation of cash, goods, and services. The Neigh- borhood Assistance Act continues t~ be an incentive for local businesses to contribute to TAP and other Community Action Programs. TAP's 1985 Summer Youth Employment Program was the recip ent of a Presi- dential Summer Jobs Award, recognizing it as among the one hundred most outstanding in the nation. As a part o` the Summer Program, TAP Youth Services played host to 250 teens and 100 adult: at the National Youth Conference in July. TAI''seducationprogramshadanoutstandingyear: Theindividualizedinstruc- tionand extra support of ProjectREAP and theAdult Basic Education Program en- abled 70 youths and adults to earn their GEDs. "America the Strong", a speech by Cabell Brand, TAP President, to the Roanoke Torch Club, received recognition as the Outstanding Torch Club Speech of the year. October 25th saw the dedication of the Harrison Heritage and Cultural Center. Now the Harrison Museum of African American Culture under the dynamic Leadership of Melody Stovall, executive director, the museum is a showplace and a tribute to the heritage of Roanoke's black residents. TAP celebrated its 20th anniversary w ith a visit from Sargent Shiver, veteran of the War on Poverty and first director of the Peace Corps. The Southwest Virginia Community Foodbank ended the year with the kickoff of a major food drive to collect 200,000 pounds of food from local corporations. The foodbank distributed over 1.5 million pounds of food this year :0 180 member agencies that, in turn, fed 28,800 hungry Southwest Virginians. Project Discovery, TAP's college option orientation program -for minority and low-income high school students, wound up its 3-year demonstration grant from the U.S. Department of Education, Fund for Improvement of P st-Secondary Education (FIPSE} by spinning off from TAP to incorporate as ti ~ third TAP- initiated statewide Community Action network. 1 9 8 6 IRAN-CONTRA SCANDAL SHOCKS NATION TAP's Virginia CARES -funded programs continued the commitment to prison- ers -that segment of the poor~all too often forgotten by society in general. Pre- release programs helped 21.6 inmates plan a successful transition,into their home communities. 203 ex-offenders received career development services and continu- ing support toward self-sufficiency. 136 family members of, priso~~ers were given counseling and transportation to visit their loved ones. Head Start: 584 pre- schoolers served with the help of 875 volun- teers. REAP: 76 youths ABE/GED: T64 adults (30 placed in unsub - sidized jobs; 44 entered other training programs. Job Search Project: 414 served (200 placed) Wea thcri zation: 2,738 homes since 1974 Community Outreach: worked with 34 neighborhood groups 12 newly organized, 22 already estab- lished. TAP's Religious Advisory Council, under the leadership of retired Bishop Center for International Poverty and Resource Studies. The Center encourages students and faculty from educational institutions in southwest Virginia to study and find solutions to the causes of poverty and the problems that plague our world environment. The Chess Partnerships Program, a combined effort of TAP, the Harrison Center, Roanoke City Schools, the Optimist Club, and Dominion Bank, enabled over 200 low-income students in elementary through high school to learn the game and to participate in state and regional competition. In May,1987 Cabell Brand who, in addition to being TAP Board President, was Vice-Chairman of the State Board of Health, convened a meeting to discuss the health care needs of poor children. As a result, a local task force composed of pub- lic and private health care professionals, social and community service providers and TAP began !o develop the Comprehensive Health Investmen~ Project. A planning grant to TAP from the Virginia Department of Health enabled the group to design the program and apply for initial funding through the Maternal and Child Health Block Grant. TAP Community Outreach initiated the Roanoke Neighborhood Leadership Institute. Community leaders and other members of neighborhood groups gained the practical skills and information they need in order to develop their leadership styles and to work with local government to improve their communities. Roanoke County provided TAP aten-year, rent-free lease on the old William Byrd Junior High Annex fc r use as a Head Start Center. The newly-renovated Vinton Head Start Child Development Center opened in November with the capacity to serve 140 preschoolers. 1 9 8 8 U.S.S. VINCENNES DOWNS CIVILIAN AIR CPAFT IN THE PERSIAN GULF January marked the completion of the housing rehabilitation phase of _he Hollins Community DevelopmentProject. Through thepartnershipoflocalg~vernments and Community Action, c;~ncern for the needs of slow-income community led to a multi-faceted program of housing rehabilitation, water/wastewater services, road improvements and a neighborhood park. As early as the late 1960's, TAP outreach workers identified the critical need for water/wastewater services in the community, which straddles the Botetourt/Roanoke County line. CDBG funding, as well as grants from the Virginia Water Project and Farmers Home Administra- tionmade community improvements a reality. Roanoke County, as project admin- istrator,requested the expertise of TAP's Housing Comp onent in the evaluation of the 52 houses in need of structural rehabilitation. Later, through a competitive bid process, the Housing Component was awarded $180,230 to make repairs on 28 of the 52 units. Emergency Assistance: 4,456 families Referrals to Emegency Housing 147 families Fire Prevention Pro- gram :1,155 Smoke Detectors installed in dwellings occu- pied by low-income families with small children or elderly. Alcohol Education: 670 youths, 105 adult offenders 1,258 alcohol interventio~t services OJT: 91 participa»ts Project Discovery: 235 high school students The big news in 1988 was the opening of~TAP's Transitional Living Center on September 15. With a HUD Supportive Housing Demonstration Grarit for half the annual operating expenses and the other half raised from the community in an un- precedented 6-weeks emergency campaign; TAP was in the business of providing shelter and supportive services to the homeless. Since.its opening, the TLC has sheltered and served more than 500 persons, over 30% of whom are families. Unlike most eme~~gency shelters, the TLC houses people up to 24 months while they take the steps to acquire the skills and. knowledge they need !o.make it an their . own. to the state for $15,000,000 to address the needs of the poor in areas served by Com- munityAction. Although no additional funds were forthcoming from the General Assembly in 1990, the study has been a valuable tool in illustrating the needs of Virginia's low-income residents. Also in January, thanks to contacts made by the Brand Center, TAP played host to a VIP tour of representatives from the World Bank, the U.S. Agency for International Development, the Ford Foundation and the United Nations Develop- ment Fund. These experts were interested in Community Action as a model for community-based programming in developing nations. Early in the year, TAP made the decision to takes its case to the community and initiated the first Annual Campaign. With a Fundraising Comrruttee of the Board chaired by Monty Plymale, Senior Vice President at Central Fidelity Bank, and the help of Bill Bowen, a local fundraising consultant, TAP's first campaign netted $325,000 to be used for agency and program operations. The W.K. Kellogg Foundation of Battle Creek, Michigan awarded TAP a 4-year, $1.5 million grant for the addition of a parent involvement component to the Comprehensive Health InvestmentProject. As a result, the project staff increased in number from 4 to 14 and moved from a room in the Roanoke City Health Depart- ment to spacious offices at 402 Luck Avenue. The increased funding enabled the project to provide not only health care for low-income children, but also supportive services to increase the self-sufficiency of their families. TAP had the opportunity to showcase the project tocommunity-based health care professionals from across the country at ayear-end Kellogg-sponsored conference held in Roanoke. TAP was one of 8 demonstration sites selected by the Virginia Department of Housing and Communi ty Development for the Homeless Intervention Program. The program helps to keep families from becoming homeless as a result of catastro- phe (illness, loss of employment, etc.) by providing up to 9 months of rent or mortgage payments while the family regains self-sufficiency. Renovations were completed on the Women's Wing of the Transitional Living Center, enabling the facility to increase its capacity from 45 to 75 homeless persons. JLARC (the Joint Legislative Audi t and Review Committee) published its review of Community Action in Virginia. In addition to recommendations made for strengthening Community Action, the report documented services to over 160,000 low-income residents in Program Year 1988, and the.leveraging.nver $42 million dollars in Community Action funding from $5 million in Community Services Block Grant monies. The report judged~the vast majority of Virginia's CAAs fully viable with "ability to provide needed services tolow-income personsand to attract and develop support, such as funding and community participation, necessary for continued operation." Cabell Brand, president of TAP, was appointed to another term on the Sta to Board of Health and was selected to chair that body. Cabell was also appointed to serve on the newly-established Virginia Housing Foundation. TAP's Housing Component initiated several new projects this year. A rural Housing Preservation Program through the Farmers Home Administration, to be completed by December 1990, will substantionally rehabilitate 40 homes of low- income families in Alleghany and Botetourt Counties. The Alleghany Highlands Community Housing Impravement Program will enable the development of a housing resource board which will act as a local housingauthority inthe Alleghany Highlands. ,. _. On December 23, 1989, tragedy struck. Just after 10 a.m. on that Saturday morning two days before Christmas, firefighters were called to battle a blaze at the TAP headquarters at 702 Shenandoah Avenue in northwest Roanoke. The fire, the cause of which was never determined, destroyed 25 years of staff and participant files, grants written and contracts awarded, photographs and newsletters, reports and statistics which documented the history of TAP. The fire destroyed the TAP building and its contents, leaving the agency temporarily without a home. But one thing the fire did not destroy was the spirit of TAP. The spirit of TAP is people-the TAP staff; the many volunteers who give of themselves; the commu- nity which rose to the occasion with offers of space, furnishings, equipment, supplies, and money; but most important of all, the low-income people for whom TAP exists. The spirit of TAP survived and grew strong. a which, if funded, will replicate Project Discovery in every state in the nation. TAP's newest initiative to go statewide is the Comprehensive Health Invest- mentProject. With $23 million from the W. K. Kellogg Foundation, CHIP will be replicated across Virginia in 20 different sites over the next 4 years. TAP continues to network within the Roanoke Valley, too. After months of negotiation, TAP and the United Way of Roanoke Valley have begun what we believe will be a long-term relationship. TAP is currently participating in the United Way's 1990 Campaign, from which it will receivea $100,000 grant to support vital TAP programs. As a Pacesetter organization in this year's campaign, TAP employees proudly doubled their 1989 contribution to the United Way! Since early spring, TAP has provided extensive technical assistance to the Inner City Athletic Association. ICAA is expanding its board and developing the potential for annual fundraising to support its program of building self-esteem and fostering pride inlow-income youths through organized sports and activities. On August 30, at the annual conference of the National Association of Commu- nity Action Agencies in Chicago, Cabell Brand received the prestigious Lydon Baines Johnson Human Services Award for his 25-years as advocate, innovator and tireless volunteer in the fight against poverty. Early in September TAP found itself facing the reality of state budget cuts and the specter ofGramm-Rudman at the federal level. In order to conserve resources and prevent a possible shortfall late in the program year, TAP was forced to eliminate its Emergency Services programming in the Roanoke Valley. The move resulted in the layoffs of 8 employees and created a gap in the safety net for low-income residents of the Valley, the implications of which still have not been fully realized. A successful Annual Campaign which resumes after the United Way campaign ends inmid-November, will help to bring about the reinstatement of these services. Saturday, September 29 saw the resounding success of the first Henry Street Heritage Festival, sponsored by the Harrison 11~Iuseum of African American Culture. The enthusiasm of the thousands of people who turned out for the entertainment, sales and exhibits, food and fund sent the message that Roanoke's black population is truly an asset and the interest in Henry Street is alive! So the story continues. 45,000 persons, more than 15% of the total population of TAP's service area, live in families with incomes below 125% of the Federal Poverty Guidelines. TAP currently has resources to serve only about~l/4 of those low- income people. TAP's commitment as we enter this, our second quarter_century, . is to continue to seek the resources and develop the programs to provide even greater numbers oflow-income families with ahand-up, not a hand out. TAP's mis- sionremains that of bringing together all~available resources to address the causes of poverty in our community. With .help from everyone, TAP is making a difference. •, j54'f' ~ ,.~ ..E ~ :.e~flsa~t4,"., .•_.•xY „rF: ;iar+~c~v... ... sw... ...:J saYi.l ~ucisiY~i.11Y '-~-