Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout6/27/1995 - RegularC~Suixnt~ .af ~.~r~tx~u.C~ ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION AGENDA JUNE 27, 1995 ~RAR S M /If 1~ Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement in order to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings or other programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County, please contact the Clerk to the Board at (703) 772-2005. We request that you provide at least 48- hours notice so that proper arrangements may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. ROLL CALL AT 3:05 P.M. HCN ARRIVED AT 3:17 P.M. 2. Invocation: John M. Chambliss, Jr. Assistant Administrator 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. 1 B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS FM ANNOUNCED (1) D.2 CONTINUED UNTIL 7/11/95, AND (2) ADDED I-1, FIRST READING OF ORD TO DECLARE REAL ESTATE TO BE SURPLUS. PMM ADDED ITEMS TO EXECUTIVE SESSION: ('1) LEGAL MATTER CONCERNING POTENTIAL LITIGATION, OCCIDENTAL DEV LTD.; (3) PERSONNEL ISSUE. LBE ADDED ITEM TO EXECUTIVE SESSION (3) PERSONNEL MATTER CONCERNING EARLY RETIREMENT OPTION FOR COUNTY ADM.; AND ADDED ITEM T-7, TO ACCEPT OR RE.TECT EARLY RETIREMENT OPTION; AND ITEM 7-8, RESOLUTION TO ESTABLISH SALARIES FOR COUNTI'Y ADM AND COUNTY ATTY C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS NONE D. BRIEFINGS 1. Results of the Citizen Satisfaction Survey. (Frank Martin, Martin Research) PRESENTED BY ANNE MARIE GREEN AND FRANK MARTIN BL:T ASKED THAT STAFF REVIEW SURVEY IN CONNECTION WITH CAPITAL NEEDS, AND SUGGESTED A WORK SESSION OR RETREAT ITEM 2. Public Health Service Plan for the Fifth Planning District. (Dr. Molly Rutledge, Director, Alleghany Health District) z FM ADVISED THAT DR RUTLEDGE WAS UNABLE TO ATTEND THE MEETING AND HAS ASKED TO BE RESCHEDULED FOR 7/11/95 E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request to debar Wayne Engineering Corporation from consideration for award of future contracts. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) HCN MOTION TO APPROVE STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND DEBAR HCN WITHDREW MOTION HCN MOTION TO TABLE ITEM FOR THIRTY DAYS WITH FURTHER DISCUSSION IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING POTENTIAL LITIGATION URC BI.~T SUGGESTED WORK SESSION ON PROCUREMENT CODE 2. Resolution recommending legislative proposals to the Virginia Association of Counties for the 1996 Session of the Virginia General Assembly. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) R-62795-1 EGK MOTION TO ADOPT RESO WITH THREE LANGUAGE CORRECTIONS AYES: BL.T„ EGK, LBE, FM NAYS: HCN F. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS CONSENSUS FOR WORK SESSION ON PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE PLAN FOR 7/11/95 G. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS 3 NONE H. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA B .-T MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING AND SET 2ND READING FOR 7/25/95 URC 1. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to operate a private horse stable located at 8411 Olsen Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Robert E. Murphy. 2. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to operate a private kennel located at 5502 South Roselawn Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the petition of Helene Mawyer. 3. Ordinance to amend Section 30-93-14 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance to revise the sign regulations for shopping centers, upon the petition of Roanoke County Planning Commission. HCN ASKED THAT MEASUREMENT OF SIGN BEFORE YOU CAN INSTALL A SECOND SIGN BE ADDRESSED AS PART OF REVISION OF SIGN REGULATIONS I. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance declaring several parcels of real estate to be surplus and accepting offers for the sale of same (Well lots -Arlington Forest, Cherokee Hills 2 and North Lakes 2 and 3). (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) EGK MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING AND SET 2ND READING FOR 7/11/95 URC 4 J. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance appropriating the funds for the 1995-96 Fiscal Year Budget for Roanoke County. (Brent Robertson, Budget Manager) 0-62795-2 EGK MOTION TO ADOPT ORD AYES: BL.T, EGK, HCN, FM NAYS: LBE BL.T AND LBE REQUESTED THAT STAFF USE SIMPLER METHOD TO EXPRESS SALARY INCREASES 2. Ordinance to increase the salaries of the members of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County pursuant to Section 3.07 of the Roanoke County Charter and Section 14.1-46.01:1 of the Code of Virginia. (Elmer Hodge, County Administrator) 0-62795-3 EGK MOTION TO ADOPT ORD WITH 5% INCREASE AYES: BI{,T, EGK, LBE NAYS: HCN, FM ONE CITIZEN SPOKE K. APPOINTMENTS 1. Community Policy and Management Team C.P.M.T. REQUESTED RITA GLINIECKI BE REAPPOINTED FOR ONE YEAR TERM. COr1FIRMATION ON CONSENT AGENDA. 2. Fifth Planning District Commission LBE NOMINATED FM AS ELECTED REPRESENTATIVE AND EXECUTIVE COMIVIITTEE MEMBER FOR THREE YEAR TERM WHICH WILL EXPIRE 6/30/98. 3. Highway and Transportation Safety Commission AT RECOMII~NDATION OF CHIEF CEASE, FM NOMINATED LT. STEPHEN TURNER AS POLICE REPRESENTATIVE AND TAMES C. MARTIN AS SENIOR CITIZEN REPRESENTATIVE FOR FOUR YEAR TERMS WHICH WILL EXPIRE 6/30/99. 4. Library Board 5. Virginia Western Community College Board AT RECOMII~NDATION OF DR DOWNS HCN NOMINATED TAMES W. AREND TO SERVE FOUR YEAR TERM WHICH WILL EXPIRE 6 3/ 0/99. L. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. R-62795-4 EGK MOTION TO ADOPT CONSENT RESO URC 1. Approval of Minutes for May 17, 1995. 2. Resolutions requesting acceptance of following recreational and industrial access roads into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary State System: a. .88 miles -Green Hill Park Road (Route #1185) R-62795-4.a 6 b. .26 miles -Goode Park Road (Route #961) R-62795-4.b R-62795-4.c c. .20 miles - Clearbrook Park Road (Route #908) d. .20 miles - Garst Mill Park Road (Route #1373) R-62795-4.d e. .14 miles - Walrond Park Road (Route 823) R-62795-4.e R-62795-4.f A-62795-4.g f. .40 miles -Valley Tech Road (Route #830) 3. Designation of Voting Delegate to National Association of Counties Annual Conference, July 21 - 25, 1995. 4. Confirmation of appointment of parent representative to the Community Policy and Management Team. A-62795-4.h A-62795-4.i A-62795-4.i 5. Request for official acceptance and appropriation of $150,000 Community Improvement Grant for Valley TechPark to the Capital Projects Fund. 6. Approval of Investment Policy Amendments. M. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS Supervisor Eddy: (1) Attended Roanoke City ceremony for water treatment plant. (2) Attended Camp Roanoke graduation picnic for Camp DARE. (3) Attended Volunteer Appreciation Day at Green Hill Park. (4) Commented on report from VDOT citizen survey regarding Rt 221 improvement. (5) Re ag rding letter from Tack Griffith, asked for status of a use agreement between recreational and School facilities. PMM advised background work being done and issue will be addressed in next few months. (,6) Asked about funding options for Northside gym, lecture room, classrooms. ECH will brim, back information from School Board after bids come in. ~'n Asked for status of George Pierce complaint about cost of sewer line and~ossibility of reimbursement as proposed in his memo. ECH spoke of the three alternatives that staff proposed and GB recommended reimbursing $1,000 and that ordinance not be revised. (8) Advised that he is a part of the steering committee for Greenway Plan for Roanoke Valley. and it is moving forward with consultants being interviewed and first workshop set for 7/24/95. Supervisor Nickens: (1) Requested job evaluation forms for firefighters in Roanoke County, Roanoke City and Salem. (2) Advised that he talked with Dr. Gordon about relocation of parking lot from William Byrd High School and was told it would not cost over $120,000. (3) Responded to LBE's memo about budget: (a~ agrees that each dept should have mission statement as part of budget process or separate issues; (b) asked that staff should bring during month of Tuly a deadline by which they can be held accountable for Vehicle Replacement Policy, (c) agrees that specific cost savings or increased service delivery should be given for items in budget;, and (d) disagrees that County Adm. decides budget - it is approved by the majority of Board vote. (4) In response to article in RT&WN that Explore was not being funded by Roanoke City because request was not submitted properly, described the contents of four documents from Explore to the Roanoke City Council requesting funding. Supervisor Tohnson: (1) Requested that County Attorney advise how much money had been spent to date on bankruptcy process in Fla to recover funds for Dixie Caverns. (2) Asked for status of County maintenance of stormwater detention ponds in residential subdivisions. (3) Requested status of welcome signs and foliage as suggested by Plannine Commission beautification project. ECH advised that this project was budgeted and progress will be determined by PC. (4) Asked for progress on internal auditor position. ECH advised that this will be brought back to the Board in thirty days. ~5) Asked for status of Health Department leases. ECH and TMC advised that the lease will be brought to the Board on 7/25/95. ~G) Expressed his support for fire and rescue volunteers and felt that the reporting of his comments at workshop in the RT&WN were taken out of context and inappropriate and that entire workshop should have been reported. ~'n Advised that he would not support the request from the Roanoke Regional Chamber of Commerce for opposition to interbasin s transfer of water regarding Lake Gaston proposal. 8 Will give responses to staff concerning ioint meeting with City Council on 7/11/95. (9 Will address early retirement option later on agenda. Supervisor Kohinke: ~1.) Commended Mayor Bowers for stand suppOrtln_g_ Explore funding. (2) Apologized for not attending Volunteer Day at Green Hill Park. (3) Asked about damages from recent rains. ECH reported minor damage and was helping to fill Spring Hollow Reservoir. ~4) Complimented staff on budget Process and suggested that in the future, needs should be determined first and then fix tax rates. Supervisor Minnix: (1) Announced that he has accepted iob as air traffic controller at Lynchburg Tower starting August 1, 1995, and this will not interfere with BOS. N. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND CONIlVIUNICATIONS NONE O. REPORTS BL.T MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE - UW 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Accounts Paid -May 1995 5. Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investment and Portfolio Policy, as of May 31, 1995 6. Bond Project Status Report 9 P. WORK SESSION NONE Q. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (3) to discuss personnel issues; (5) to discuss location of a perspective business or industry; and (7) to discuss a specific legal matters requiring the provision of legal advice by the County Attorney and briefings by staff members concerning potential litigation, (1) Occidental Development Ltd. vs. Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County and (2) Wayne Engineering Corporation. LBE MOTION TO GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION AT 5:45 P.M. URC R CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION A-62795-5 BLOT MOTION TO RETURN TO OPEN SESSION AT 7:00 P.M. AND ADOPT RESO - URC EVENING SESSION S. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Public Hearing and Adoption of Resolution for allocation of funds for the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary Road System Six-Year Construction Plan for Fiscal Year 1995-1996. (Arnold Covey, Director of Engineering & Inspections) R-62795-6 EGK MOTION TO ADOPT RESO URC io T. PUBLIC HEARING AND .SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance vacating an unimproved dedicated right-of--way referred to as Ocala Drive, recorded in Plat Book 4, Page 63, Sun Valley Subdivision, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the Petition of Glenn J. and Mary Ann Hammerand and Robert A. and Frances E. Vessey. (Arnold Covey, Director of Engineering & Inspections) 0-62795-7 BL.T MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC 2. Ordinance to rezone .84 acre from C-1 to C-2 to operate a karate and fitness studio, located at 5407 Peters Creek Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Susan Carol Rolfe and Mark Reinhardt. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 0-62795-8 BI.~T MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC 3. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to operate a used car lot, located on the west side of Williamson Road 400 feet north of its intersection with Plymouth Drive, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Shelor, Inc. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 0-62795-9 BL.T MOTION TO ADOPT ORD AYES: BL.T, EGK, HCN, FM NAYS: LBE 4. Ordinance amending and reenacting Ordinance 82592-12, Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, to allow manufactured homes in the County's agricultural zoning districts pursuant to Section 15.1-486.4, as amended in the 1995 Legislative Session, upon the petition of the Roanoke County Planning Commission. (Terry Harrington, 11 Director of Planning & Zoning) 0-62795-10 HCN MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC 5. Ordinance to rezone approximately 68.4 acres from AG-3 to AR to construct single family detached dwellings, located beyond the terminus of Toddsbury Drive to the east, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of Akfer Corporation. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 0-62795-11 HCN MOTION TO ADOPT ORD AYES: BI.~T, EGK, FM NAYS: LBE ABSTAIN: HCN 6. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to build a construction storage yard on the southeast corner of Route 220 and VA 674, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Jim Walter Homes, Inc. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 0-62795-12 FM MOTION TO DENY SPECIAL USE PERMIT AYES: BL.T, LBE, HCN, FM NAYS: EGK THREE CITIZENS SPOKE 7. Resolution expressing the election by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, to accept/reject the option for an unreduced retirement benefit for the County Administrator is involuntarily separated from County services. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) BL.T MOTION TO TAKE NO ACTION AND LET STATE LAW GO INTO 12 HCN SUBSTITUTE MOTION TO TABLE UNTIL LATER DATE (RESULTING IN NO ACTION AND ALLOWING STATE LAW TO GO INTO EFFECT) URC 8. Resolution establishing salaries for the County Administrator and County Attorney. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) R-62795-13 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE 4.8% INCREASE FROM MIDPOINT FOR COUNTY ADM. AND 4.8% INCREASE FROM MIDPOINT FOR COUNTY ATTY AND $3,000 INCREASE FOR AYES: BL.T, EGK, HCN, FM NAYS: LBE U. CITIZEN COMII~NTS AND CO1bIlVIUNICATIONS NONE V. ADJOURNMENT TO ~ ~.~~0-Pz'0'~., 'T'T v ~ ~ ~ ~ c~nc~ inn ~ ............................ 1~?>`AMl AT 8:45 P.M., BL.T MOTION TO AD TOURN TO 7/5195 AT 10 A.M. FOR PURPOSE OF MEETING WITH CONGRESSMAN GOODLATTE AT RCAC - URC 13 M F ~ AN ~ ~ ~ C~~Dr~xxt~ ~~ ~~xxt~.~e ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA JUNE 27, 1995 ~avr o rrr ~u r~ Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement in order to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings or other programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County, please contact the Clerk to the Board at (703) 772-2005. We request that you provide at least 48- hours notice so that proper arrangements may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: John M. Chambliss, Jr. Assistant Administrator 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS i C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS D. BRIEFINGS 1. Results of the Citizen Satisfaction Survey. (Frank Martin, Martin Research) 2. Public Health Service Plan for the Fifth Planning District. (Dr. Molly Rutledge, Director, Alleghany Health District) E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request to debar Wayne Engineering Corporation from consideration for award of future contracts. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 2. Resolution recommending legislative proposals to the Virginia Association of Counties for the 1996 Session of the Virginia General Assembly. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) F. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS G. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS H. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA 2 1. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to operate a private horse stable located at 8411 Olsen Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Robert E. Murphy. 2. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to operate a private kennel located at 5502 South Roselawn Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the petition of Helene Mawyer. 3. Ordinance to amend Section 30-93-14 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance to revise the sign regulations for shopping centers, upon the petition of Roanoke County Planning Commission. I. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES J. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance appropriating the funds for the 1995-96 Fiscal Year Budget for Roanoke County. (Brent Robertson, Budget Manager) 2. Ordinance to increase the salaries of the members of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County pursuant to Section 3.07 of the Roanoke County Charter and Section 14.1-46.01:1 of the Code of Virginia. (Elmer Hodge, County Administrator) K. APPOINTMENTS 1. Community Policy and Management Team 2. Fifth Planning District Commission 3 3. Highway and Transportation Safety Commission 4. Library Board 5. Virginia Western Community College Board L. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTIlVE AND WII,L BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Approval of Minutes for May 17, 1995. 2. Resolutions requesting acceptance of following recreational and industrial access roads into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary State System: a. .88 miles -Green Hill Park Road (Route #1185) b. .26 miles -Goode Park Road (Route #961) c. .20 miles - Clearbrook Park Road (Route #908) d. .20 miles - Garst Mill Park Road (Route #1373) e. .14 miles - Walrond Park Road (Route 823} f. .40 miles -Valley Tech Road (Route #830) 3. Designation of Voting Delegate to National Association of Counties Annual Conference, July 21 - 25, 1995. 4. Confirmation of appointment of parent representative to the Community Policy and Management Team. 5. Request for official acceptance and appropriation of $150,000 Community Improvement Grant for Valley TechPark to the Capital Projects Fund. 4 6. Approval of Investment Policy Amendments. M. REPORTS AND INQUIItIES OF BOARD MEMBERS N. CITIZENS' COMII~NTS AND CO1bIlVIUNICATIONS O. REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Accounts Paid -May 1995 5. Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investment and Portfolio Policy, as of May 31, 1995 6. Bond Project Status Report P. WORK SESSION Q. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (5) to discuss location of a perspective business or industry. R CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION EVENING SESSION S. T. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Public Hearing and Adoption of Resolution for allocation of funds for the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary Road System Six-Year Construction Plan for Fiscal Year 1995-1996. (Arnold Covey, Director of Engineering & Inspections) PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance vacating an unimproved dedicated right-of--way referred to as Ocala Drive, recorded in Plat Book 4, Page 63, Sun Valley Subdivision, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the Petition of Glenn J. and Mary Ann Hammerand and Robert A. and Frances E. Vessey. (Arnold Covey, Director of Engineering & Inspections) 2. Ordinance to rezone .84 acre from C-1 to C-2 to operate a karate and fitness studio, located at 5407 Peters Creek Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Susan Carol Rolfe and Mark Reinhardt. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 3. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to operate a used car lot, located on the west side of Williamson Road 400 feet north of its intersection with Plymouth Drive, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Shelor, Inc. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 4. Ordinance amending and reenacting Ordinance 82592-12, Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, to allow manufactured homes in the County's agricultural zoning districts pursuant to Section 15.1-486.4, as amended in the 1995 Legislative Session, upon the petition of the Roanoke County Planning Commission. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 6 5. Ordinance to rezone approximately 68.4 acres from AG-3 to AR to construct single family detached dwellings, located beyond the terminus of Toddsbury Drive to the east, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of Akfer Corporation. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 6. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to build a construction storage yard on the southeast corner of Route 220 and VA 674, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Jim Walter Homes, Inc. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) U. CITIZEN COMII~NTS AND CO1bIlVIUlvICATIONS V. ADJOLTI[tNMENT TO 12:30 P.M., JULY 11, 1995, FOR A JOINT MEETING WITH ROANOKE CITY COUNCIL AT THE ROANOKE COUN'T'Y ADMINISTRATION CENTER ~i Gounty oPRoanokc ~I Dues and Other Significant Contributinn$ I, F~' 1995,96 Hudgct ~I i i 1992-93 1993-44 199.2-45 ~ 1nn5.96 1995-96 ~ Organization i Actual ~ Actual i Budgrt Request i Proposed '~ ~~ ~~ I ~ ~- ~ ~ '~~~ i ii Blue ltidgc Region jg I ~I flue Ridge Soil and Ctmservation District ;i I Convention and Viyiwrs L;urcau ~i Oparating Capital-Technology LJpgrades it ti4iss 4'irgL'tiR Pagefln[-advertisinfi I I J:~coromic Development rartnership 1"lttlt ?1R*tr.In~ DISU•1C Cpmmt8s10q ~ ~ I rust L?rion Training i\i iltlCSnal l~SSOLtatlon t)I LJl.n'1C~~. lvational'~ivic lzagtte ltoanokc Regional I. Ciitttrhrr o[ Conuncrce I I~ Roanokt River ]iagin ASSOC1Rtirrn Salet>y-Rocnc~ke County ~,a4o $ x,404 ~~ 1A40 1,040 35,000 74.332 OI OI 0! UI. 7 i .567 2;.504 107,544 ~I,SUU I 3,000 ' $ 1.404 107.500 0• UI 107,544 Z I .St1U x,000 ~$ U II 1,540' 1,040 :54,+700 107,504 ~ - Ci7,71 ti ~ 4 I~ 3,noo i o I~ ' t o7.soo '~ 1 o7_soo ' - 21,900 ~ 21,940 ~ - 4 71,(1(717 75,fi40 0 4 ~~ iA32 1,557 ~ 1,557 1.55', ~ 1.557 zoo Zoo zon ~ zon Zoo I' ~I ~ Z.Sn0 Z,Sao 2,00 ~ 2soa I 2,SOO ~~ ~- I 0 0 0 1Z,15(J ', 4 '' ~I Chamber of Cornmarce b.000 b,000 (1,000 ~ 7,000 6,t~00 i t I I l ~ vinton Chamber of Commerce 104 ' 100 104 100 100 !i VirginiR.4mateur Sports 2S,OOU 30.444 i 34,000 ', 35,Of;0 ~ 35,0001 °' i !~ Virginia Associa(ion of Counties i t 1,900 t 1.900 ', ~ ~ 11,900 ~ 1?,555 ' ~ 13,855 I ~~ Virginia lnstimte of Ca~~ertuncnt I 0 0 0 ~~ 5,000 S.U04 ~ ~ I I I i ~ I I, Virginia Municipal Leagttc 12.971 12,471 ~ 14,3U~ 14,30 i 11,301 ~ ~ I I ~ I ~I Total i91.870,LS ?52.56D $ $ 382,OSg_~$ 546_;279 ,$ 316.413 - - li ~~ _ i I'~ ~ i i I ~ ~ I ~ ~I ~ ~~ 06%27145 08:.4 AM i3UDGF'f~.bonk-wk'•13-L7L'FS96. WiS,4 T~_~ 'd Ot~ ~~ Sr,; ~~ unr Post-It'" brand tax transmittal memo 7671 ~ of Pages _ ~ Froan 11 Co. ~ Co. Phone p , Dept. _` Fex N [-. ~~ ~ .,~ ~t'7 "~ 3 Fax # Cwtnty at' Roanoke Contribtttians to Social 5en•icc and Cultural Agencica FY 1495-46 Rud;tet H - C.oatributians i 1492-43 Actual 1443-9+t Actual 1944-95 BudLet - 1495-96 Request j 1945-9G Fropaaed _. ~Hcalth and Social Servicca - ~ ~ '~ n; Eluc Ridge CC mmv ty Scrvtces 579.332 ~ ~f79,33~ ~ $79,33'' - 'll 15:254 $79,33' ` * TAP i '5,000 25,OOr} ^S,OUt; 34,866 15,000;; TAY-TYnrsitional irivins Ccn:cr I 15.000' 15.000' 1{,000 , 14.941 15AUU!',* i ~ $) 19,3321 el lu.?3= I r $l 1x.332 $175.063 , $1;9.33: i ~ I Culture! Enrichtntnt! Tourism I ~ Alt+h>•o Stagg Sow! $0 $.t..50Cs' $?,Si7(l b2.j0(1 $x,500" Appul;whian Railroad Heritage Par:nersltip Q 0 0 ~ 2.000 2,r10i~ ~i Ar.;ufusaum of Vi'estcrn Virginia 0 I 1.004 1.040 ~ 3 Arts Counvil otihe Blue Ridge i 2.500 ~ 3 n0ii ~ 3.000 . J.300 3,000 ~` ' .. Center in the 5qutue I i SAr'0 I 20.004 3C! ~O(i 75,000 50A00 * l:.xrtore(ThcRi~•erFuundntaon} ~ 0 100.000 14+)~J04 tSU,UUO 154.04+1i 'r Friends of the B)uc Ridge Parkway 0 0 ~ n ~ 15 nOU . 0 •I Julian StunleY Wiselvfu?cum S,Ut)O. U U 0~ )tifiL' A4ountain Theutrr C 3,500 B.SiiO) !5,000 B.SUOI'* h1i11 Mountain 7.0o Operating i U , 4,OOC 4,000 P,,50U ti.000 * _ Capital 0 0 U 47,j4rs 10,000 '" _ S152C~-Ca}' YSViiIOn 0 U 10,000 I 10.000 I O,QOU li ^Snt c Amcri.ur, F~sitv3l QO I 1.5511 ) :51t 6 ' I Rnanokc Arts Commissiar .'itt S)ta.~~ ~ ~1 ~ SUU ~ SU0 i i'r "- Roanoke Symphony i 2.50+~~ S.itt~G 7.500 7,SOfi 7.500, I i Roanoke vaDey K;story Mwcum I U ~ 6,450 G,45U 6.350 1 6,.35('1 Science Museum' rJreratirg 0 10.1}00 1'•1.000 25,000' _ 25.000,;* Carnal 0 U '+ 1rt0,000 2U.000','~- I Trnsportotion~tust.um 4,50(1 !1:1,000 IU!)00~ 10,004 10,000;*~ Vinton f>crgwood Festival ~I SOU • 500 SOtl I 500 ' 540 ', 534.500 $173,000 $1y5.>OU $490.1$0 :k311,350 ~'Othcr 1 ~ I Eluc Ridge Smutl Business Center $Cs , 50 a'.+ $5,C140 ' SO ' Irea~ue of Wnmcn Voters 275 275 _"5 Z'S .75 li ~ :~1s V itginid Satliot Citi>•,cn 3'agcant 0 0 4 ] UO , l UU ; ~ Miss Virginia Pngrtml 5114 , 500 SU4 500 SUU ~* I' Roanoke volley korse Shaw U {1 0 ~ U ' VA Western Community Coh~gc i Scholiaship Lund 5.585 $.433 ~ 5,433 5,..74 5,274 Natural Scicnca Ccntcr I U , 4 0 7.250 ; U ail ConstTVCtion 5tudcnt 1 Ii nctivitica Ccntcr-2nd yr U 0 13,527 40,580 ! 3,527' Slat! DCVG1aPiriet7t - ~~a[cr RctCntion and ' ~ Facility artd Purkiri$ ItTipiovemcntc '~ ~: U Ct; U titi,379 rs ~- - $6,30(1• $n:?OS''. $14 ,3j' $125,35R'~ $19,670' 'total CuntriButions $156.191, $298,540 $334,5671_ $794,571 i F45+),35R '".4ge-tClrs located in l+;nannl;r Cory -- contrlbutlan to Raannke City social sernic~e uge-icoes !s 519%j,S(1 Total fur ult contrlbatians to Raanokc City a,~enCJrs lr $777;117 (1 f~1',ttnanoCibudgc0.boak•~~+k1B•CC?N'f4G WK4 UE'27>a5 IU:3U:A1i ~~~t~sU ~0 ' d ? b r 56 ~ ,_G ulll ~i:: T ~'- _ ~~-~U~ ` ~'~ 3~iPJH1'~i I ~ -I I.1 ~:~OhdHO.~ Counn~ of Roanoke Contributions to Human ServlCe .~>;cncieb FY 1945-r6 Dudact 1992.93 1993-94 I 199J-95 ~ t495Ati ~ 1995Ah Ilulnan Scr.ict Agency ~ Actual Actual i Budget Rtique:tt Propoxed 4dul("ve Center olthe Roanoke Valley A+sociation for Retar6cd Gitizcrr {ARC1 Acthnny I•Iall Sig Brothers and Big Sii;ttts o; Roanokr ~'ailcy I31uc Ridge Ragional l;ducalion and Trainitlg C:nunCii erudte~ Frcc Clinic Care c;c.~:ition o; Itaanoi;e Vattey Child A>iuse Prcvcntion Couneif of'Ramlokc vat?cy Child flealfh lnvcstmcnl Purtntr5ht~+ (CHtty;. ConSict 17tsoiutien Ccntcr C'auncil o: Community $c'ti~iccy- lnformution attd Rcfcrraf Center Court 4p~einted 5peciaf Ai;vccatc (Ca5A1 i`-atnily ticr+-ice oftllc Rour+oke Va1ic~ Fifth Dlsrrlct Fmpioymtnt.g Trainiro Consortium 4I•I Game Goodwill Industrits Tinker Mnuntaiss League pf ptdcr Amtrica<~s LitttaCy voluntrrrPrograrn tilt. Itogcrs Shcitcr I•Iome, Inc. i\atinnal 1`iuitiplc 5cterosis Society Roanoke Area Itiinistr;es Rnanokt Valley 13rug and Alcohol Ahutir Counct! Raanokc vB11ey Spccch d: Hearing Ccntcr i ~ Ti1c Salvation Arnly TRUST '1 ~! Total CuntrE[~utions i ! I ' II I'* 'F~I,OUO; ~F5,OOUj '~S,U(:s0 ~ g5,0o() $S.OOO 4.04C ~ ! 0.400 1(s,OUC 'f!; ?9S ~ i GA00 ~* i 0~ 5U0~ 5(?0 ~ 2,600~'~ 500~'~` ~ c? I U' 0 ' ~,504I 0!,~ 0 ~ G C 3,3k71 OII ~ (;,540 ti,504 G,544j 6.$04 ti.SOO ~ i OI {) 0 1,6001 U! ',720 3,S(Jr1 3,Sr,4I 3,500 3,544i~* ~ 0 ~ 5,4O(? 16.!;60; 25.OOi.I i i (i,1i60 * i!i UI Oi x,0O4, ~ 4I I ' J_~CO. 3.004 3,440 ~ i~.314 x,404 G 4~ i.f'`~~ ~.UOU 1,03, z.~o4~ :..004: 3.444 i a,O(,4~ ~,040,~* ?,5041 i :;.UOO) 3.000 3.8:6' 3,000 ~* C 2,Sfj(li 2,5001 2.54(1. 2,5001 ~,5{)p' S.000I 5.0001 3,200 5,0041 • i t(?;4(?0 1:,SUr1 12.54P tK,2r6I IZ.OU ',i* U, 1.053 I 4 O 4 4 ~ o' 4 l.noo' 4 0'. U' n 84is 0l~ 1.3~'t 2,000 2,Ot)0~ 2.500' 2.(?0{)'* 4', 0 0 2,5441 U 0, 5(?0i 5401 1,000' S00~* 0; 2,500 2.SU4~ 2,4041 z,00o~* S,Ot)(?~ ~ ~,544I 5,504 (i.Ot70 j,500i* I ' S~t5.55?. S't,0`3i 88.2,71:1; $l?~3.234 ~R2213; - I ~ ! i °Agencf~s taacaled rn Rt~ruto~I~ City -- cuntrlburion trr Roanoke Cf{r human servlte a~enci'~s is $?3,650 Toraf for al! cvntributlnns to Rv~rnohe City agrrrcles fs ~271,OI t? m'`.~inarce:budectitrook•w'-;'',H1~7S4C9(i.tb'IC4 06.n7l95 t0:3Z A.Al ~~j~ TCi ~d ter: r. ~~r,, `,' U1-il a-;T,~- '~-~i ~~' ~'~ ~~PJHIvI~ -i i_i ~;;{I I~dHp,~ ACTION N0. ITEM NUMBER ~- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 27, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Results of Citizen Satisfaction Survey COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Frank Martin of Martin Research asked to personally present the results of the survey at the Board meeting where he can help to interpret the findings and answer questions. He is completing the compilation of the report and plans to distribute the copies at the meeting. He has asked that the results not be released until that time. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Martin Research surveyed 500 County households by telephone, asking a variety of questions about County service levels and citizen satisfaction. Frank Martin of Martin Research will be present at the June 27 Board meeting to review the results and answer any questions. BACKGROUND• At the Board retreat in January, 1995, the staff was directed to conduct a citizen satisfaction survey, with results available around July 1. Martin Research was hired to assist with writing the questions and actually conducting the survey, which was done during the month of May. Anne Marie Green, APR Elmer C. Hodge Director, Community Relations County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) Kohinke To Minnix Nickens i ~-~ AN ASSESSMENT OF RESIDENT OPINIONS AND ATTITUDES TOWARD SERVECES PROVIDED BY ROANOKE COUNTY June 1995 A Research Report Prepared For: COUNTY OF ROANOKE Roanoke, Virginia 24018 MARTIN RESEARCH, INC. Richmond - Ruanoke - Nurfulk ~::!!~. :a~• ~~Ilr ";' ~~"t 'll: Merlin RdMaICh 2 ASSIGNMENT AND METHODOLOGY ASSIGNMENT -The purpose of this research was to gather attitudes and opinions of Roanoke County households toward: o changes in the water/sewer billing cycle o departmental service levels o responsiveness of county departments and employees o a bond issue to finance seven County projects In addition we were to measure the levels of importance and obtain grade scores for nineteen County departments and services as well as resident. usage of twelve County services. Media penetration into County households and media preferences for obtaining information regarding County services and programs was also explored, along with demographics of the survey universe. FIELD INTERVIEWING -All interviewing for this quantitative research study was completed by our own staff of trained field interviewers from our offices in Roanoke. No portion of the interviewing process was sub-contracted. Interviews were completed during all day parts, including nighttime and weekends, to ensure that as many selected households as possible were included from the original sample. INTERVIEWING QUOTA -Our completed interview quota was 500 completed interviews from a random selection of households within the geographic confines of Roanoke County. Martin Research w 3 SAMPLE SELECTION -Since there was no readily available source of county households and phone numbers we ordered the sample from Survey Sampling, Inc. of Fairfield, Connecticut, a firm specializing in providing the service. The sample included both listed and unlisted numbers, allowing us to construct the sample to approximate the Roanoke County universe as closely as possible. 4UESTIONNAIRE DESIGN -The questionnaire was designed by Martin Research, Inc. under the supervision of and with approval from the Roanoke County executive staff. It was also reviewed by members of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. TABU CATION -After questionnaire editing all surveys were entered into our in-house computer tabulation system. We use computer tabulation programs created by both Microtab, Inc. and SPSS in analyzing all survey results. A number of special cross- tabulations were completed for this report, these are detailed within the computer printout which accompanies this report. RELIABILITY AND ACCURACY - A completed interview quota of 500 surveys provides first order tabulation accuracy at ±5% at the 95% confidence level. This is an accepted accuracy level in surveys of this type, considering both data requirements and cost. i Martin Research 4 RESIDENT USAGE OF COUNTY SERVICES AND FACILITIES Respondents were asked the number of times within the past 12 months they had used the following County services or facilities: o called the police for emergency assistance o called fire or rescue for emergency assistance o visited a county park o attended a Recreation Program or Center (430) 86.0% never (65) 13.0% once or twice (5) 1.0% 3-12 times {500) 100.0% (432) 86.4% never (61) 12.2% once or twice (7) 1.4% 3-12 times (500) 100.0% (210) 42.0% never (125) 25.0% once or twice (104) 20.8% 3-12 times (61) 12.2% > 12 times (348) 69.6°~° never (54) 10.8% once or twice (65) 13.6% 3-12 times (29) 5.8% > 12 times o called or visited the County Administration Center (246) 49.2% never (194) 38.8% once or twice (52) 10.4% 3-12 times (8) 1.6% > 12 times o applied for a building permit (458) 91.6% never (39) 7.8% once or twice (2) .4% 3-12 times (1) .2% > 12 times ~,' i Martin Research 5 o had contact in person or on telephone with a county employee o visited a coup library o called for bulk/brush pickup o visited a Roanoke County School o called or visited the extension office o attended an Extension Office program in the areas of Home Economics or Agriculture/Horticulture (221) 44.2% never (166) 33.2°~° once or twice (92) 18.4% 3-12 times (21) 4.2% > 12 times (167) 33.4% never (79) 15.8% once or twice (131) 26.2% 3-12 times (123) 24.6% > 12 times (268) 53.6% never (161) 32.2% once or twice (68) 13.6% 3-12 times (3) .6% > 12 times (285) 57.0% never (58) 1 1.6% once or twice (72) 14.4% 3-12 times (84) 16.8% > 12 times (418) 83.6% never (58) 11.6% once or twice (21) 4.2% 3-12 times (2) .4% > 12 times (485) 97.0% never (1 1) 2.2% once or twice (2) .4% 3-12 times i Martin Research 6 SUMMARY OF RESIDENT USAGE OF COUNTY SERVICES AND FACILITIES ti-VITHIN THE PAST 12 MONTHS..... . 0 67% have visited a county library 0 58% have visited a county park 0 56% have had contact in person/by phone with a County employee 0 51 % have called or visited the County.Administration Center 0 43% have visited a Roanoke County School 0 42% have called for bulk/bush pickup 0 30% have attended a Recreation Program or Center 0 16% have called or visited the extension office 0 14% have called the police for emergency assistance 0 14% have called fire or rescue for emergency assistance 0 8% have applied for a building permit 0 3% have attended an Extension Office program in the areas of Home Economics or Agriculture/Horticulture Martin Research 7 IMPORTANCE OF SERVICES AND RATING OF THESE SERVICES BY COUNTY RESIDENTS Survey respondents were read a series of 19 county services and were asked how important these services were to them as County residents. Those respondents who said "very important" or "somewhat important" were then asked to grade this service on a school grading state of A, B, C, D, and F...grade pluses and minuses being accepted. These services, their importance levels, and resident grades are shown below: SERVICE VERY/SOMEWHAT NUMERICAL LETTER IMPORTANT GRADE GRADE Police Crime Protection 99.8% 87.0 B 78 (16%) citizens rated Police Crime Protection C or lower Police Traffic Enforcement 95.4% 85.8 B 91 (19°/°) citizens rated Police Traffic Enforcement C or lower Fire Protection 99.6% 91.1 B+ 19 (4%) citizens rated Fire Protection C or lower Emergency Medical Services (EMS) 98.8% 90.7 B+ 37 (7%) citizens rated EMS C or lower Garbage Pickup 98.0% 90.5 B + 50 (10%) citizens rated Garbage Pickup C or lower Brush/Bulk Trash Pickup 88.6% 86.3 B 100 (23%) citizens rated Brusk/Bulk Pickup C or lower Library System 88.6% 90.9 B+ 18 (4%) citizens rated Library System C or lower Park Facilities 85.2% 86.4 B 78 (18%) citizens rated Park Facilities C or lower Martin Research 8 SERVICE VERY/SOMEWH.~T NUMERICAL LETTER IMPORTANT GRADE GRADE Recreational Facilities 78.8% 85.6 B 81 (21 %) citizens rated Recreational Facilities C or lower Public Schools 90.0% 88.0 B+ 57 (13°%) citizens rated Public Schools C or lower VA Cooperative Extension Service 61.4% 86.6 B 42 (14%) citizens rated VCES C or lower Planning and Zoning Services 72.4°0 82_~ ~» i08 (30%) citizens rated Planning & Zoning C or lower Water & Sewer Utility Departments 81.4% 86.9 B 64 (16%) citizens rated Water & Sewer C or lower Building Inspections and Permits 76.0% 83.7' 89 (23%) citizens rated Building Inspections/Permits C or lower Social Services 72.2% 85.2 B 67 (19%) citizens rated Social Services C or lower Voter Registration 93.0% 89.6% B+ 45 (10°1°) citizens rated Voter Registration C or lower Health Department Services 79.2% 87.4 B 44 (1 1 %) rated Health Department Services C or lower Roads and Draina e 97.6% ~ ~~~ 183 (38%) citizens rated Roads & Drainage C or lower Minim m Acceptable Score: 85.0 Scale: A + = 100-98 B + = 91-88 C + = 81-78 D + = 71-68 A = 97-95 B = 87-85 C = 77-75 D = 67-65 A- = 94-92 B- = 84-82 C- = 74-72 D- = 64 Martin Research 9 ATTITUDINAL RESPONSES Survey respondents were read a series of attitudinal statements with multiple choice responses and were asked to indicate their feeling toward each. DEPARTMENTAL SERVICE LEVELS -About 41 respondents (8% of the survey universe) felt service levels provided by all county departments were too high. Fully half of these responses had to do with water/sewer service, the balance had to do with taxes being too high. And 80% felt county services were "about right". But 6% said they were too low. The majority of these responses centered on additional police protection (5 households), bulk brush/trash collection (5 households), water/sewer service (7 households), and road servicelrepair/snow removal (6 households). Clearly, county departmental services are pleasing and are adequate to 8 in 10 Roanoke County households. SAFETY -About 85°0 of County respondents alwavs feel safe in their home and immediate neighborhood, and 15% feel safe "sometimes". We recorded zero responses for "never". RESPONSIVENESS OF THE COUNTY TO ITS CITIZENS - We asked whether the County was responsive to its citizens always, sometimes, or never. Responses were: (255) 51 % "always" (208) 42% "sometimes" 93% (9) 2°J° "never" ~~ (S00) 5% "undecided/don't know" 100% Martin Research 10 COURTESY AND POLITENESS OF COUNTY EMPLOYEES -Over two-thirds (69%) of our respondent group reported County employees were always polite and courteous. Some 22% said "sometimes", and 2% (8 respondents) said "never". The ALWAYS departments shown by percent of mentions were: 0 21 % trash pickup 0 16 % water/sewer 0 16% tax department 0 16% county treasurer 0 10% police/rescue 0 10% license/permit department 0 6% public library 0 5% Commissioner of the Revenue 0 4% schools [Note: These mentions should be evaluated taking into consideration the frequency of contact and the reasons for contact) The NEVER departments (2% of the sample universe) shown by percent of mentions were: o water/sewer 2 responses o trash pickup 2 responses o S other departments received 1 mention each _ ~ Martin Research 11 PUBLIC SCHOOL ACTIVITY BY COUNTY RESIDENTS About one-fourth (25.2%) of our respondent households reported that someone within their household currently attended a Roanoke County Public School. This rose to more than 50% when the 30's and 40's age groups were isolated, to 34% with county residents of 1-5 years, and to 41 % with 6-15 year county residents. Of those households which have students in the County School System attendance at Elementary Schools was: 0 47.6% reported no Elementary School students in the household 0 38.1 % reported one student (10% of the total sample group) 0 12.7% reported two students (3% of the total sample group) 0 1.6% reported three students (- of the total sample group) Of those households which have students in the County School System attendance at Middlellunior High Schools was: 0 60.3% reported no Middle/Junior High students in the household 0 37.3% reported one student (9% of the total sample group) 0 2.4% reported two students (1 % of the total sample group) Of those households which have students in the County School System attendance at High Schools was: 0 61.1 % reported no High School students in the household 0 35.7% reported one student (9% of the total sample group) 0 2.4% reported two students (1 % of the total sample group) o .8% reported three students (- of the total sample group) Two-thirds (67.4%) of our total respondent group who did not presently have a student in the household reported at least one household member attending a Roanoke County Public School in the past. Martin Research 12 COUNTY BOND PROJECT ACCEPTANCE Respondents were asked "If your taxes were to increase by $30 per year would you favor issuing bonds for ", a list of six projects under consideration by the County. Acceptance levels are shown below: -- Percent Favorine o Improvements to existing school buildings 71.2% o Public Safety improvements such as jail expansion, 68.2% Emergency 911 upgrade, fire hydrants, new fire station [support decreased as age increased, highly favored by newer residents to the County) o More or upgraded park/recreationa) facilities 47.2% o Industrial Park development 43.2% o Upgraded or new County Library facilities 43.0% [highly favored by younger age groups] o Anew Cave Spring High School 35.2% [Favored by about 40% of those with children in school, and 55% of those in zip code 24018] o Anew elementary school in Bonsack 30.0% 13 ROANOKE COUNTY WATER/SEWER CUSTOMERS About two-thirds (68%) of our County resident respondent group reported being current water or sewer customers. This rose to 76% among 1-5 year residents [no doubt reflecting geographic locations] and dropped slightly to 65°io among > 15 year residents. The highest density zip code was 24019 (82%) and lowest 24153 (23%) covering the area adjacent to Salem. When asked about a preference as to monthly or quarterly billing 25% chose monthly, 24% quarterly, and it made no difference to 49%. Demographic cross-tabulations showed no data of interest. When asked about payment by credit card only 6.2% (21 respondents) would prefer credit card, 91 % would not. When asked about making payment through an automatic debit to the residents bank account the response level to the previous questions was too small to present accurate tabulations. The present method of billing customers seems to be the preferred choice but monthly billing instead of quarterly does appear to be an acceptable option. ;: ,::: :: Martin Research 14 THE BIGGEST PROBLEM ROANOKE COUNTY WILL FACE WITHIN THE NEXT FIVE YEARS When asked this question the responses received pointed up no clear consensus as far as county residents were concerned. The most-mentioned problem still received only 12.2% of the voting. Responses in descending order were: 0 12.2% -overcrowding of schools/not enough schools 0 10.0% -population increase/growth needs 0 9.2% - drugs/crime 0 9.0% -economic development 0 7.6% -increased traffidnew roads 0 6.8% -tax increases 0 5:2% -water/sewer availability 0 4.4% -consolidation with city 0 4.0% -available jobs 0 1.2% -zoning 0 4.6% -miscellaneous responses 0 25.8% -don't know Martin Research 15 CHANNEL 3 EXPOSURE WITHIN THE COUNTY We found that 83.8% of our County residents included in the survey universe subscribed to cable television. Demographic comparisons showed us that: o cable television subscription increased with the age of the respondent to a high of 89% in the 40's and 50's age groups, but dropped to 76% in age 70+. No other demographic cross-tabulations were significant. In the past 12 months about 61 % of our respondents who subscribe to cable reported watching Channel 3, The Government Access Channel. Within this group which had watched, about 6-in-10 (60%) respondents reported watching it 1-5 times, 4-in-10 (40%) five plus times. With regard to watching all or part of the Board of Supervisors meeting on Channel 3, 44.8% reported viewing a meeting in the past. Most viewing frequency was in the 1-5 times range. When asked which news sources provide information about Roanoke County government we were told: 0 81 % receive information from the newspaper 0 74% receive information from local television news 0 39% receive information from local radio news 0 22% receive information from local cable channel 3 Multiple responses were recorded, each respondent named an average of at least two media sources. When asked about the program "Roanoke County Today", 44.2% had seen it, and, again most viewing was in the 1-5 times range. Martin Research 16 DEMOGRAPHICS OF THE SURVEY UNIVERSE Lived in Roanoke County: Own versus Rent: 1-5 years 15.8°/° own 91.0% 6-15 years 20.2% rent 8.6% 100.0 > 15 years 63.8% 100.0% - Aye of Groups of Res pondents: Home Zip Codes: 20's 7.2% 24018 37.2% 30's 17.8% 24019 19.8% 40's 20.4% 24179 15.0% 50's 14.4% 24153 8.0% 60's 21.2% 24014 11.0% 70's 18.6% 24012 5.4% 100.0% 24070 1.4% Male Respondents - 41.2% 24015 .8% Female Respondents - 58.8% 24017 .4% 100.0% other .8% don't know { .2% 100.0 A total of 85.0% of our respondent group were registered voters in Roanoke County. Martin Research ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER - AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 27, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Briefing by Dr. Molly Rutledge on the Public Health Service Plan for the Fifth Planning District COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY' Attached is a copy of a letter from Dr. Molly Rutledge concerning the Public Health Service Plan for the Fifth Planning District. You will recall that Dr. Rutledge was asked to serve not only as Director of the Allegheny Health District, but also as Director of the Roanoke City Health District upon the resignation in December 1993 of their Director. Since that time, Dr. Rutledge's staff and other consultants have studied the advantages and disadvantages of combining the two Health Districts. In addition to this change, the Workforce Transition Act has been implemented which is causing a loss of 10 employees to the Allegheny District and 25 employees to the Roanoke District. The plan involves shifting more of the responsibility to the private sector and uses economy of scale. This appears to be a good plan for our region. Dr. Rutledge plans to be present at 3:30 p.m. on June 27 tb discuss the impact of this new service plan and answer any questions that you might have. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, ohn M. Chambliss, Jr. /~Elmer C. Hodge Assistant Administrator County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) Kohinke To ( ) Minnix Nickens d~, p~9 .\ e "'~lT,.- ALLEGHANY HEALTH DISTRICT P. O. BOX 220 Serving the People of: Flricastle, VA 24090 Allegheny County Botetourt County Craig County Roanoke County City of Clifton Forge City of Covington PLEASE NOTE OUR NEW TELEPHONE NUMBERS City of Salem Telephone: (703)473-8226 Facsimile: (703)473-8242 June 14, 1995 Mr. Elmer Hodge County Administrator County of Roanoke P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 Dear Elmer: ~~ Tel. 703~8~7-78W Fax No. 857-6991 Molly L. Hagan Medical Director Patty P. Tiller Administrator Linda M. French Nurse Manager A. M. `Mo" Owen Sanitarian Manager Nancy S. Harvey Nurse Practitioner Manager Enclosed is the proposed "Public Health Service Plan for the Fifth Planning District" for the upcoming fiscal year. The background information in the proposal will provide you with an orientation of why we are suggesting changes in our public health service delivery system. 1 am very interested in receiving feedback from your locality. After you have had a chance to review this plan, I would appreciate a call from you to let me know whether you would like for me to make a formal presentation to any of your constituents to get further feedback or whether you feel comfortable in giving me the conceptual nod to proceed with these changes, assuming we receive the appropriate funding. I appreciate your interest in public health and your continued support. I look forward to hearing from you soon. 1 am, Sincerely yours, ~ ~~. Molly L. Rutledge, M.D.1~ Director Allegheny and Roanoke City Health Districts MLR/kjd ~- a PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE PLAN FOR THE FIFTH PLANNING DISTRICT (Submitted by Molly L. Rutledge, M.D. on behalf of the Management Teams and Staff of both the Alleghany and Roanoke City Health Districts on May 31, 1995) BACKGROUND: In December, 1993, the Medical Director for the Roanoke City Health District resigned, leaving a vacant Health Director position in Roanoke City. At that time, 1 was asked to consider serving as Health Director for both the Alleghany and Roanoke Ciry Health Districts by the Community Health Services Operations Director for the Virginia Department of Health. 1 agreed to serve as the Acting Health Director for the Roanoke City Health District and to proceed facilitating a process by which the managers and the staff of both the Alleghany and Roanoke City Health Districu could research the benefits of combining public health services between the two districu. A<^uvork group was convened by staff, supervisors, and managers in both districu to study the advantages and disadvantages of combining public health services in the two districu and through the beneficial contact with the Healthy People 2000 Project of the CDC, we were visited by a<Consultant; Dr. William Orthoeffer who had facilitated two health district mergers in his career in the mid-West. Dr. Orthoeffer conducted a cursory analysis of our public health situation in the Fifth Planning District. His ultimate recommendation was that the two districts should merge. Following the research phase of the combined work group, a recom_ endation was made_to the Management Teams of both the Alleghany and Roanoke City Health District to begin combining _ __ services at the program level,, to seek the_blessng_of each locality in combining services, and to work toward developing an eventual management structure to support the c---ombinea services. At that time, a Joint Management Team was formed from representatives of the two district management teams, the purpose of which was to facilitate the evolvement of both districu toward performing duties similarly and to facilitate the combining of services as identified by staff and supervisors as appropriate. An actual programmatic combination plan was developed by the winter of 1995. In March, 1995, the Workforce Transition Act (WTA) was introduced, resulting in the_loss_Qf~0 employees in the Alleghany Health_D.istrict and 25 employees in the Roanoke City Health District, reducing the full-time public health force by 20% throughout the Fifth Planning District. On April 5, 1995, staff from both districts were invited to meet to discuss the future of public health services in the Fifth Planning District and there was a general consensus that the WTA was certainly going to force the combination issue in a much swifter fashion than had been previously planned. It was realized that by May 1, much of the Management Team of Roanoke Ciry and a majority of the administrative support staff would no longer be in service. All clinicians, except for the Health Director in the Alleghany Health District, would be lost and multiple other key public health positions would be lost to the WTA. 1 .~- a Consequently, the staff which assembled in April to begin visioning for the future were charged to participate in a process called "scenario planning" as described by Peter Swartz in his book The Art of the Long View. Through this process each subgroup addressing public health service deliveries would develop three possible scenarios which represent poinu along the continuum of conservative to very creative for possibilities of future service delivery of those particular programs. Eight assumptions were identified as boundaries to be utilized during the scenario planning: 1. It was an assumption that the 35 employees who applied for the WTA would be accepted. 2. Some activities could be discontinued. 3. We must think interdisciplinarily and interlocality. 4. The needs of the localities would vary and services must be tailored to meet each localities' needs. 5. No reassignment to another locality against the will of an employee would be mandated; however, reassignments are possible and borrowing and sharing can occur. 6. Mandated services will continue. 7. There will be a new order of doing business. 8. We must help each other see things differently. Ten work groups were assembled to proceed with the scenario planning and each work group was represented by multiple localities and multiple disciplines. The work groups included: Communicable Disease Surveillance and Investigation; Environmental Health; Chiid Health and Immunizations; Adult Health and Pharmacy; Home Health; Lab; Family Planning; Maternal Health; Vital Records; and Health Education. On May 1st, the work groups reassembled and each group presented their three scenarios to all interested staff in both districts. Upon the conclusion of that meeting, from the scenarios the staff decided that the Joint Management Team should develop a template of services which we would -- nroceed_to deliv_er_beg'nning ~1y 1, 199_5 ~ The Joint Management Team accepted this charge and asked that each work group send to them their priority choice of the scenarios developed within the respective work groups, as well as a request of what would be needed from management in order to implement the chosen scenarios. As a result of the scenario planning and the perspective of the Joint Management Team, the following report was developed to include the six major functions of public health, a description of those functions, and an annotation of the changes which will occur as a result of our decision to do things differently, to try to combine services, and as a result of the Workforce Transition Act. INTRODUCTION: Traditionally, public health has had six core functions which are population-based. Those include: Identification and Monitoring of Community Health Problems; Communicable Disease Control; Health Promotion and Disease Prevention; Environmental Health Protection; Personal Preventive Health Care; and Insuring Access to Needed Care. As reported in the NIH report The Future of Public Health, many public health departmenu across the country became encumbered with primary health care for the indigent in the 1960s and this indigent primary health care service has disallowed the delivery of many of the other core public health services. There has been a movement in the public health community since the NIH report on the future of public health to reestablish the traditional core public health functions at the local level and one benefit of our analysis and plan is that the Fifth Planning District will try to reassume a more traditional approach to providing population-based services. -c~ Since public health financial support comes from both the State and the localities, the number one consideration in redefining public health services is to meet the particular need of an individual locality first and foremost and the recognition that different localities within the Fifth Planning District have different public health needs. Additionally, it has been well recognized that Roanoke City has evolved into a much more specialized public health workforce than the Alleghany Health District, where generalization has been maintained throughout the years. This will give us a unique opportunity to join forces for better service delivery to our customers. Both districts are perceived to be well managed and customer focused and both districu have made a commitment to continuous quality improvement as well as team decision-making. To that end, 1 will proceed. Public health services in the Fifth Planning District beginning July 1, 1995 will include: 1. IDENTIFICATION AND MONITORING OF COMMUNITY HEALTH PROBLEMS: SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED CHANGES A. Mobilize Community Partnerships such as Changes will include an increased activity in this RAHP, CHIP, and an Indigent Care area as public health tries to provide some System leadership and expertise in collaborative health care problem-solving and monitoring. B. Performing of Needs Assessmenu Improve processes. C. Health Policy and Planning Previously public health professionals have had little time to influence public policy for the health of the citizens and we plan to increase this activity in the near future. D. Vital Records Handling All localities are required to have a Vital Records Registrar accessible to them. It is hoped that through the combining of services, we can explore the potential for the coordination of services in the Roanoke Valley where there are currently three localities with Registrars serving the same constituenu. This may also apply to Covington and Clifton Forge. We need to continue efficiency measures at each local health department level in preparation for decentralization of birth certificates to the localities. E. Disaster Preparedness and Response We will plan to collaborate more intensively with Emergency Medical Services at the local level in disaster preparedness in the future. ~~ 11. COMMUNICABLE DISEASE CONTROL: SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED CHANGES A. Disease Surveillance It is vital that disease surveillance continue at the locality level with increased emphasis on educating the medical community to improve their habits of reporting disease events. B. Contact Tracing, Treatment, and It is hoped that in this area there can be significant Prophylaxis of Communicable Disease coordination, some consolidation of screening and treatment services, including refugee services between the Alleghany and the Roanoke City Health Districts. Additionally we would like to develop a formalized communications network to link the Alleghany Health District generalist knowledge to the Roanoke City Health District specialist knowledge for a fast, accurate, cheap, and easy information exchange, which will allow us to give more emphasis to customer service. C. Outbreak Investigations Outbreak investigations need to be initiated at the local level, in conjunction with other public health disciplines with support and back-up from other localities. D. Immunizations Again, particularly in the Roanoke Valley, some coordination and perhaps even some consolidation of immunization activities, both for adults and children can be considered and our plan is to continue increasing our immunization activities at each locality level. III. HEALTH PROMOTION AND DISEASE PREVENTION: A. Nutrition Counseling and Distribution of WIC Vouchers to Eligible Clients We obviously want to continue nutrition counseling and WIC activities as funding allows and perhaps collaborate in the Roanoke Valley, particularly for the maternity patients and allow a nurse from either locality to enter eligible clients at Carillon OB/GYN Clinic and Lewis-Gale Clinic into WIC. 4 ~~ V. PERSONAL AND PREVENTIVE HEALTH CARE: SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED CHANGES A. Pre- and Post-Natal Care We will continue to provide prenatal care in the Health Department clinics through the agreements with Carillon residents. In the Alleghany Highlands we will continue to provide pre- and post-natal care to indigent women through our agreement with Alleghany Regional Hospital. We would Like to increase our focus and market case management, MICC, and post-delivery home follow-up and support increased nutritional services for WIC. B. Family Planning We would like to maintain the Family Planning contraceptive services utilizing clinicians from the community. We hope to increase caseloads to meet the needs and demands for the services at the locality level. C. Well Child Care and Development We wish to continue the mandated services which include WIC, immunizations, EPSDT, preschool physicals for the indigent population and preventive physical exams per our current agreemenu. We would like to collaborate with Carillon and local pediatricians to develop a seamless system of health services for children whereby sick and preventive care would be maintained by a private pediatricians from 0 to 4 years old and we would begin taking care of the mandated population at age 5 with the preschool physical and continue case finding and age appropriate preventive exams. This would fit with an increased emphasis on case management and MICC and this will also require us to reevaluate MEDALLION participation in the Roanoke City Health District and privatizing pediatric sick care to Carillon and other pediatricians in the community. We will continue the dental health program in both the Alleghany and Roanoke Ciry Health Districts (limiting PHN involvement in school health and continue our partnerships with CHIP and RAHP). ~~ VI. ENSllRING ACCESS TO NEEDED CARE: SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED CHANGES A. Adult Services We wish to collaborate with Lewis-Gale, Carillon, and other community leaders with a vested interest in health care to develop aValley-wide system of primary care for the indigent population. In the meantime, we will need to discontinue acute and prevention health maintenance clinics in both the Alleghany and Roanoke Ciry Health Districts and provide for a smooth transition of these patients into the private medical community. Our current negotiations reveal probability with the Carillon system. We would like to develop a triage referral system staffed by the PHN's and promote the use of the Pharmacy and lab services with streamlining of our current process for greater speed and efficiency and hopefully to increase our prescriptive capacity for greater numbers of people. By January 1st, we hope to have the pharmacies from both districts located within one site. B. Sick Care for Indigent Children A system will be developed in collaboration with the private pediatric sector to assure access for this population at the locality level. C. Children's Specialty Services We will continue our involvement with Children's Specialty Services through eligibility and coordination at this time. In the near future, we will insure access to the child development clinic and in the future perhaps even assume the management of this activity. D. Early Intervention with Children with We will continue our involvement. Disabilities (Part H) E. Medicaid Nursing Home Screening We will maintain our current involvement. F. Comprehensive Services Act Provisions We will maintain the current level of involvement. G. Case Management We will increase maternity and pediatric case management. H. Counseling and Support for Teen Mothers We will maintain and enhance our Resource Mothers programs throughout the Districu. ~~ I. Lab Services We will continue the existing contracts and expand as needed throughout both districts and market lab availability as we collaborate with private physicians for assurance of indigent care as the Roanoke City Health Department can provide some needed lab services at a more reasonable cost. J. Home Health We will proceed with home health service expansion in the Fifth Planning District as a separate business entity with district teams as the work unit can be self-supporting. K. ADL Services We will market and deliver ADL services in the Roanoke Valley, Botetourt, and Craig, with continued evaluation of the administrative and supervision structure of the work unit. It is clear that this reduction in primary care activities in Roanoke City, as well as preventive health care services in the Alleghany Health District is necessitated by the loss of clinicians, the Workforce Transition Act, and will be perceived as a loss by many citizens in the community. We do hope, however, to facilitate the development of an improved system of indigent care delivery throughout the Fifth Planning District and assure better services as a result. Additionally, the discontinuation of utilization of those energies in clinical services will allow staff to be involved in collaborative system development, policy, and more health education. It is obvious that an administrative support system is the next thing to be designed to support the new service delivery. Plans will be underway shortly to develop this. The first steps for implementing this plan are to get conceptual agreement at each locality level that this is an appropriate way to proceed for the localities' perspective. Assuming that we have appropriate funds to move forward, we will begin developing an implementation plan during the month of June, 1995. Respectfully Submitted: ~~ Molly utledge, M.D.~ Director Alleghany and Roanoke City Health Districts f ACTION NO. ITEM NO. "" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 27, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Debarment of Wayne Engineering Corporation from consideration for award of future contracts. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This action is to debar Wayne Engineering Corporation ("Wayne") from consideration for the award of future contracts, and in particular, contracts for the acquisition of "One-Arm Bandit" garbage trucks. BACKGROUND' This matter was originally scheduled for June 13, 1995, and was postponed to June 27, 1995, at the request of the attorney for Wayne Engineering. Roanoke County had purchased 3 garbage trucks from Wayne Engineering Corporation in 1994, and funds for the purchase of another garbage truck are included in the proposed 1995-96 budget. The County has had numerous mechanical, warranty and environmental problems with these vehicles. Article III of Chapter 17 , "Procurement" of the Roanoke County Code provides for the debarment of prospective contractors for cause by the Board of Supervisors, after consulting with the County Attorney, and after reasonable notice and reasonable opportunity to be heard. The grounds for debarment are the unsatisfactory performance of Wayne Engineering's vehicles, and the failure of Wayne Engineering Corporation. to reimburse the County for the damages caused by its defective equipment. These provisions in the County Code are authorized by Section 11-46.1 of the Code of Virginia. The debarment shall not be for a period of more than three ( 3 ) years. 1 In accordance with the procedures in the County Code the County Attorney has provided Wayne Engineering Corporation with notice of this proposed debarment action and advised it of its opportunity to be heard on this matter. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Section 17-106 of the County Code lists the causes or grounds for debarment. Staff is recommending debarment based upon the following provisions: (4) b. A recent record of failure to perform or of unsatisfactory performance in accordance with the terms of one or more contracts; provided that failure to perform or unsatisfactory performance caused by acts beyond the control of the contractor shall not be considered a basis for debarment. (5) Any other cause the board of supervisors determines to be so serious and compelling as to affect responsibility as a county contractor, ... The County is experiencing major stress damage ("cracks") in the frames of all three of the garbage trucks purchased from Wayne. All will require extensive repair work to reinforce the supporting frames of the truck bodies. All three vehicles have experienced problems with the roller operation of the trailer trays. The rollers have come out of alignment and bent the trays. All three units have experienced structural cracks in the grabber assemblies of the lifting unit. The two stage hydraulic pumps have been replaced at least once on each vehicle, and this pump has been replaced twice on one of the vehicles. The packing cylinders have had to be replaced on all three vehicles, and replaced twice on one vehicle. The hydraulic systems have been a recurring problem on all three vehicles, resulting in numerous blown hoses and hydraulic fluid spills. For example, on June 23, 1994, as a result of a defective connection design, a hydraulic line on one of the garbage trucks came loose and approximately 45 gallons of hydraulic fluid were released onto Greenway Drive. Over the summer the County worked with the affected citizens and property owners, hired Environmental Directions Inc. ("EDI") to assist the County in developing a remediation plan suitable to both the citizens and Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, and conducted 2 ,' L-. "~ remediation activities. The total cost of the clean-up activities was $43,011.67. Wayne was regularly apprised in writing (on June 29, July 20, and August 5) of the actions taken by the County during the summer, and copies of EDI's report was given to Wayne. Since the County had similar problems with the other garbage trucks purchased from Wayne, staff inquired of Wayne the cause and solution for this problem. Wayne's authorized representative for warranty repairs advised the County Garage that the pump manifold on the vehicles should be replaced with barbed fittings and to double clamp the hydraulic hoses to prevent future reoccurrences. This work was performed immediately the June 23, 1994 spill. On October 19, 1994 the County billed Wayne for its contribution to the reimbursement of these expenses. In January, 1995 Wayne replied that it "has no express or implied legal responsibility requiring us to burden any financial responsibility pertaining to this spill." The County Attorney is currently preparing appropriate legal pleadings to be filed in the near future to seek a judicial resolution of this dispute. Staff has tracked downtime for the Wayne vehicles since October, 1994. The downtime for all three Wayne vehicles has been significant, and if transport is included, two of the Wayne vehicles have been unavailable for use approximately 20% of the time. Apart from the merits of this future litigation, Wayne's refusal to stand behind its vehicles, and to share the burden of remediating the damages caused by its defective equipment is so serious and compelling that this debarment proceeding is justified. Its performance with respect to these vehicles is unsatisfactory. In April, 1995 Wayne entered into a "strategic alliance" to distribute its automated side-loader refuse collection vehicles with the Leach Company. The Leach Company has the exclusive right to distribute and service Wayne's vehicles in North America under the Leach name. These vehicles will continue to be developed and manufactured by Wayne. Therefore this debarment must include Wayne vehicles distributed by Leach. FISCAL IMPACTS• The debarment of one of the manufacturers of automated side- loader refuse collection vehicles may limit the competitive opportunities for the County under the proposed competitive sealed bidding procedures for purchase of such vehicles in future fiscal years. 3 ~- ALTERNATIVES: The Board may take the following actions, after Wayne has had an opportunity to be heard: 1) Debar Wayne Engineering Corporation (and refuse collection vehicles developed, manufactured and serviced by Wayne Engineering Corporation but distributed by the Leach Company) from consideration for the award of future contracts from Roanoke County for a period of time not to exceed three (3) years; or, 2) Refuse to debar Wayne Engineering Corporation, and permit Wayne to bid if it so desires, in the future on County contracts. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board debar Wayne Engineering Corporation, and refuse collection vehicles developed, manufactured and serviced by Wayne Engineering Corporation but distributed by the Leach Company, from consideration for the award of future contracts for a period of three (3) years from the date of this action. Respectfully sub ted, William and Director, General Services Elaine Carver Director, Procurement Action Vote No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to g.attorney. pmm.waynebar. rpt Motion by Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens Minnix 4 `r . . AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 27, 1995 RESOLUTION 62795-1 RECOMMENDING LEGISLATIVE PROPOSALS TO THE VIRGINIA ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES FOR THE 1996 SESSION OF THE VIRGINIA GENERAL ASSEMBLY WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, has identified major legislative issues of state-wide concern to be considered by the 1996 session of the Virginia General Assembly; and WHEREAS, by this resolution the Board is recommending these issues to its statewide organization, the Virginia Association of Counties, for consideration in the adoption of its legislative program. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the following legislative proposals are submitted to the Virginia Association of Counties for consider- ation in its 1996 Legislative Program. I 1996 LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM 1. Relief from recycling mandate - Repeal the 25% recycling mandate on local governments found in § 10.1-1411 on all waste collected by private haulers and diverted from waste disposal or recycling facilities identified to receive such waste as provided in the local solid waste management plan. In addition, require that private waste haulers diverting such waste be held accountable and responsible for meeting the same recycling rates and requirements as local governments. L ~ 1 1 The Board may recall that the 1995 Session of the Virginia General Assembly adopted a waste hauler displacement bill which substantially restricted the ability of local governments to regulate the flow of waste or to displace private companies providing waste hauling services (HB 1802). This legislation substantially restricts the ability of local governments to "displace" private companies providing waste hauling services however, it does not impose on these private companies any of the responsibilities or recycling mandates imposed on local govern- ments. The General Assembly should relieve local governments of these recycling mandates and impose on the private waste haulers the same obligations and responsibilities for recycling currently imposed on local governments. 2. BPOL Tax - Maintain the local option business license tax ($3 million annual impact on Roanoke County). 3. Regional cooperation - Support the creation of financial incentives by the Commonwealth for local governments to cooperate in the regional delivery of services. 4. E911 Tax - Amend § 58.1-3813 to expand eligible costs for this tax to include public safety radios, mobile data terminals, and communications equipment necessary to implement an E911 system. 5. Amendment of § 14.1-46.01:1 to increase the supplementary salary for the chairman of the board of supervisors from $1,800 to $2,500. 6. Education - Realizing that public education is the foundation of American democracy and the cornerstone of our future 2 r economic well being, the County urges the General Assembly to enhance funding for public education, including increasing the funds available to the Literary Fund for local school capital construction or renovation projects. Local school divisions should be authorized to establish opening dates for school. Disparity funding should be based not only upon the number of students eligible for free or reduced fee lunches, but also upon the locality's local tax effort in support of education. Disparity funding should be based upon the composite index (which measures a locality's relative fiscal ability to provide its share of the cost of a local school system that meets the standards of quality) and the locality's local effort in support of that school system. II That the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors is directed to send a certified copy of this resolution to the Executive Director of the Virginia Association of Counties. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Minnix NAYS: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. H lton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney James D. Campbell, Executive Director, VACo 3 r ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~"' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 27, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution recommending the 1996 Legislative Pro- gram for the Virginia Association of Counties COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Executive Director for the Virginia Association of Counties recently requested proposals for consideration for VACO's 1996 legislative program. On May 17, 1995, staff provided the Board with this memorandum from VACo and requested Board sugges- tions for legislative proposals. On June 13, 1995, the Board considered and discussed several legislative proposals. The attached resolution reflects this Board discussion. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board consider the adoption of the attached resolution recommending legislative proposals for VACo's 1996 legislative program. Respectfully submitted, ~1 Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens Minnix Vote No Yes Abs 1 ~-a AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 27, 1995 RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING LEGISLATIVE PROPOSALS TO THE VIRGINIA ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES FOR THE 1996 SESSION OF THE VIRGINIA GENERAL ASSEMBLY WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, has identified major legislative issues of state-wide concern to be considered by the 1996 session of the Virginia General Assembly; and WHEREAS, by this resolution the Board is recommending these issues to its statewide organization, the Virginia Association of Counties, for consideration in the adoption of its legislative program. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the following legislative proposals are submitted to the Virginia Association of Counties for consider- ation in its 1996 Legislative Program. I 1996 LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM 1. Relief from recycling mandate - Repeal the 25% recycling mandate on local governments found in § 10.1-1411 on all waste collected by private haulers and diverted from waste disposal or recycling facilities identified to receive such waste as provided in the local solid waste management plan. In addition, require that private waste haulers diverting such waste be held accountable and responsible for meeting the same recycling rates and requirements as local governments. 2 •• O~ The Board may recall that the 1995 of the Virginia General Assembly adopted a waste hauler displacement bill which substan- tially restricted the ability of local governments to regulate the flow of waste or to displace private companies providing waste hauling services (HB 1802). This legislation substantially restricts the ability of local governments to "displace" private companies providing waste hauling services however, it does not impose on these private companies any of the responsibilities or recycling mandates imposed on local governments. The General Assembly should relieve local governments of these recycling mandates and impose on the private waste haulers the same obliga- tions and responsibilities for recycling currently imposed on local governments. 2. BPOL Tax - Oppose the elimination of this local option business license tax ($3 million annual impact on Roanoke County). 3. Regional cooperation - Support the creation of financial incentives by the Commonwealth for local governments to cooperate in the regional delivery of services. 4. E911 Tax - Amend § 58.1-3813 to expand eligible costs for this tax to include public safety radios, mobile data terminals, and communications equipment necessary to implement an E911 system. 5. Amendment of § 14.1-46.01:1 to increase the salary for the chairman of the board of supervisors from $1,800 to $2,500. 6. Education - Realizing that public education is the foundation of American democracy and the cornerstone of our future economic well being, the County urges the General Assembly to 3 enhance funding for public education, including increasing the funds available to the Literary Fund for local school capital construction or renovation projects. Local school divisions should be authorized to establish opening dates for school. Disparity funding should be based not only upon the number of students eligible for free or reduced fee lunches, but also upon the locality's local tax effort in support of education. Disparity funding should be based upon the composite index (which measures a locality's relative fiscal ability to provide its share of the cost of a local school system that meets the standards of quality) and the locality's local effort in support of that school system. II That the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors is directed to send a certified copy of this resolution to the Executive Director of the Virginia Association of Counties. legis.96.vaco 4 r ACTION NO. u ITEM NO. 1 1 I~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 27, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Requests for Public Hearing and First Reading for Rezoning Ordinances Consent Agenda COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' The first reading on these ordinances is accomplished by adoption of these ordinances in the manner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions, rather approval satisfies the procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public hearing and second reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public hearing on these ordinances is scheduled for July 25, 1995. The titles of these ordinances are as follows: 1) An ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to operate a private horse stable located at 8411 Olsen Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Robert E. Murphy. 2) An ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to operate a private kennel located at 5502 South Roselawn Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the petition of Helene Mawyer. 3) An ordinance to amend Section 30-93-14 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance to revise the sign regulations for shopping centers, upon the petition of Roanoke County Planning Commission. MAPS ARE ATTACHED; MORE DETAILED INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE IN THE CLERR'S OFFICE. .~ ~I-3 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: (1) That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of these rezoning ordinances for the purpose of scheduling the second reading and public hearing for July 25, 1995. (2) That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth as Items 1 through 3, inclusive, and that the Clerk is authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action. Respectfully submitted, ~~~~~~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Minnix Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens Vote No Yes Abs t, e f rUl .eta, .... ~~ ~~ ',.. ,,.~:: ~ c ~ --- Proposed Zoning: ~ / S~ 1 ~ , ~- r Proposed Land Use: ~~SL ~~ ~ ~. ~~ For Staff Use Only Use Type: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and fronta9~RED FIRSTnts of the requested district? YES ~_ NO ,_._-- IF NO, A VARIANCE 1S REQU ~ YES ~ Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type. _-` -- NO _~_ IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. ___ re uest, are conditions being pror""eyed with this request? YES ___ NO z nin o q re If 9 .. .. Variance of Section(s) of.the •Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the a plication complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF P THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v ws v ws v i Application fee / Consultation ~ 8 1 i2" x 1 1 " concept plan 7 Proffers, if applicable •~ Application / :n Metes and bounds description J ~ Adjoining property owners ~~s Water and sewer application Justification l hereb certify that l am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and y am acting with the knowledge and n ent of~tyhfe owner Owner's Signature: i' / ~ ~ l _ , From: R.E. Murphy 8411 Olsen Rd• 24019 Roanoke, Va. RE• Application for .Special Use Permit (SUP) To: Dept. of Planning and Zoning County of Roanoke P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Va. 24018-0798 April 20, 1 995 +"}~` Dear Sir(s)- This past~Christmas I sought to .fulfill a.lifelong dream uire a horse as a "surprise gift. of my family. to acq - _ Accommodations of .land were more-than enough. with tion~.ofranother . . fencing, ~ the adds and with 'some.repair.of existing ___ _. " 'ne of :fence~and.the necessity~_~to~enclose one corner_of an - ':li _ _ uire existing shed for a stall (shed-type structures do .not reg building permits), the purchase-was made -__:_ ::. - . - With the_work complete, the horse"~was;:delivered _ :approximately 3•weeks'after .Christmas. - _ thin -was perfectly legal I honestly believed that every g. 'nce this was nothing more than acquiring-another "pet." si informed me several weeks later than we A neighbor, however, were violating zoning codes by having a horse on land zoned for residential use. -This was "news" to ws since we knew very roblem could be easily little about zoning laws. I thought the Pas told, however, remedied by rezoning to agricultural. I of such a move and that the best thing to of the difficulty do was nothing. I suspected that the hint was designed to protect current property value. have been, in fact, violating It bothered me that I may county law, and sought to inquire with friends who had horses ro erty was properly zoned, as to what to do. Although their P P ness" of life pushed most suggested that I "lay. low." The "busy the matter aside, but the nagging feeling of doing something ,. w-~ ~..__. - ..__ al caused me to imagine the worst scenarios. ~~^~ - illeg - the horse in the Believing that the Lord wanted me to buy would be Belt beginning and believing further that everything seeking with properly, .I sought to put the matter to rest by Bob Johnson. To my relief, counsel from my district supervisor, he informed me that special permits for such situations can Harrington, Director of be- obtained. He referred me to-Terry ecial Planning who sent the necessary forms for obtaining a Sp Use Permit. I then made arrangements to meet with zoning planner, Jon Hartley on April 19 who covered the essentials of which this letter is a part. of the SUP, on county zoning As to the impact of our action uP e of any kind ordinances, I have learned that- virtually no Chang No special will be -felt by adjoining neighbors or the community. - - e water, roads ,. easements, action is needed in the-way of sewag , - ~. and that the stall is .sufficiently distanced-from adjacent . etc. , - .' - ~ ' more horses for property. There is no intention of boarding - 'vate use :nor is'.their any intention of ;boarding "other" horses pri - ro erty_is sow - ~_~ for profit. -The fact that-:five acres of -our P P - - and the -. in.Christmas trees ..(application .f or Land-Use Program), - and the-rest forested; prevents us `remainder .being a dwelling uire great . -from acquiring additional horses. To expand would rro'ect. expense of clearing more land - a very undesirable p J As you consider this proposal, please bear in mind our this may have been goal to fall within county law. To some, but we believed a simple matter not worth the time or effort, differently. This is the right thing to do. We look forward to meeting you. Sincerely yours, ~~~~ R.E. (Gene) Murphy 8411 Olsen Rd. NW Roanoke, Va. 24019. ~ ~ .: Lp.. 9 >9r •~// .~ ~ ~~. .-/2 4~; U GTON T ~'' ~ h .MOUNT ~ P ~',~ OU~RR1 I ~.~~ RED C`_~ ~ t \ pwlC _ ~-Y ~aug VICINITY MAP .oMC;~ 117 2 - /~ Sff ac, / / e /~ iM k ~ j~ P ~~ >~ 4 ~ / tf~ 4 \ /i 1 a ~,,, ~ o `iii P ~~ /i- ~_~ ..~. ,~~,;~. o ~,. aax i% °s rye // ,/ ,~~ /ice .u.<. ~ ti e/ ~,..~ /{gyp 'Q,,,' ~I ~~. . J ;/ ~o~• I /~ ~ ^ ~ ~ / ~ /~,G ? (~~/' 4 ,J '~x / •T IJM ~~ * DEPARTf~NT OF PI,AI~INING ROBERT E. MURPHY a A,~tD ZONING SPECIAL USE PERMIT MAP '~ 26.11-2-1 :_ ,~ COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.O. Box 29800 •. Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 FAX (7031772-2030 tn~ srarr use oniv date rr~ceived: ~ ./ri`, ~ received by: ~~: application fey C/ ?C/BZ~ da'e: /5 ~ placards • ~ ~ • BOS date: ~• 7/z5 1~ Case Number: ~~,~ ~ ~~ Check type of application filed (check all that apply): ^ REZONING SPECIAL USE ^VARIANCE Applicant's name: ~Cl~ti~ /~'l,ti,, ~ Phone: `>?51 [ r37 Address: s~oz ~ ~~ ~-~ ~ ~~i~~.-~ 2 d ~,~,~L, U~ Zip Code: Z=~^i3 Owner's name: ~ ~ rt~ Phone: Zi d Address: p Co e: Location of property: Tax Map Number: =„ L. `~: _ - "; ©.~; ~~~~~~ Magisterial District: i,(1 . Community Planning Area: I ~J. r~ Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: ~-- ~ / • 5~ acres Existing Land Use: ., - .• ~=~_ -~.• -.. ~--. ,~ ~ • -~~.~ sq.ft. - Proposed Zoning: ~ -- ~ ~ - f For Staff Use On/y T ~ r.~ .-t , it Proposed Land Use: /'~ ,,,.,; ., ~c 'r. _ ' Use ype: ` . /fft-~ ~- 3 ~OG S - l~ ~~ ~Gnxe.~ ~,t.c~~. Does the par eet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES ~ NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. . If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Z oning Ordinance in order to: .,/ Is tf~e application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. nos v ws v ws v Consultation ~ 8 1 /2" x 1 1 " concept plan Application fee Application '~ ~<t Metes and bounds description ~;< Proffers, if applicable i Justification ~??~. Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners l hereby certify that l am either th owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge d •,o~ t of the caner. Owner's Signature: ~~//J 1~ ~~ t , _ ... __ \1..... {~nf -_ .lam ~ ~ ~ l~`; Y (..~ / t _ applicant ermit requests to determine the need and The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use p r the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following justification fo questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. s2 furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (See zon ng ordinancel'as the Please explain how the reque purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning distract classification ~n t in how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Please expla _ ~ Comprehensive Plan. r- _~_ ni~nr~ifl(1 Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, d~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ""~ ~ -- area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. _ ~~ ~ ~J ~ ~ ~~ ~~' / ~' ~ ~ ._ . , r- -~ M e~ . 2 • ~ - JCr' { ~ e• ~y c ~ 0 ;~~v J .c 1~ Um _.. 1~ '7 Jam' •~~ d~~ ~~` U ~_ c~.sC~ ~- .N :s s~ -~6 ~~ j r~ ~ ~ • !~~ ~~ ~ 'l i ~v - ~_, i t Z i•;~i i r ~ ~ ~ ~ r J f v, ~ ~- ~ I ?~ ~~ cll ~~ ter co cA JU ~ 'v~ 1 C ~ ~ ~ ~' ` ~ ~ , N'~O~ 1~ ~ 1 I - 0 1 . sd~.> ~ -~ Cn {~ I ~ ~tlM a~l~d . m ~I rM 1 :.,~~,~ 0 1 r ~ ~; \ ~ 0 1 •~ . ~~ ~' vl p '1 - - .L, N ~U ~ ~cy~ ~ Z c V v ~ a'~ y ~ Z ¢ F- C 0 ~ yl G o ,~ c+ .- U `_ r-. '~ L' : G'~ ~.'~ -- C ~cZ L y U G7 ~G W ~ y~ ~ P" = > C ,'r C . ~~ ~ ~ N o C a O CD C] G o n~ ~ -- N> 2 0 ^ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~, C j ~ c ~ ~ L r/ < C '~ ~ ~ z CL C G ~ ~~ u C 1 + O ~ H `. U 0 u 2 O _ ' 7 a ,. H z ¢ VI ~ ? o - cn ~ - ~ ~= O ~ - z z c J W ~ V ~ O c O J J w ~. ~ __ F, ~ : Z ~ '-' ~- (,: H z c o = ~ C z ~ z O ~ < W X cn O ~ ~? ~.. ~ •_ ~ p ' _ N ~ ~.r 1 ,~G~u , ~ ~ y : .o G i H - J~ ° c t-- ~+ .3 ~ ° Z ~ 3 ~ : ~ d o ~~ viz a~ ~~~ .i J ~ l!~ LL .~ ~O We LL ~ 0 ~c~ap 0 ~ c v~ c o C L a ~ ~ ! e ~- ~ Ow a o ~ Z ~ 3 'o `~ 3 '~~ t 6G L ~ t J_ ~i n1 1- d ~ d C_ ` ~ ~ ~~ N -i ~' .2G'Zo{ t ~6 "~d 6 '4J"d ..uooM~~UI?J~1 _ ~ e l`I '» S / t ~I ~ 0'1~ ~ ~ L~ c«v.< Z J~,_._~ y _'~=%Z < i } _z=_> -'"~~~_ _% - _ "!.i I z ----_ lJ c~ TT 0 ~.1, i~ T- J C' ~ m n ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ `" ' ~~ ~~~~~ ~ .. .. Z ~ V a of --~ ~ ~~ _..... _'C~`r~~~~ ~.,a}ARLING~~ V %ti ~ .. crvl ~n~ GE '~i °" V ~Ai f ~I`~ till. n. F ~~~y / r.~;t • LQ `~~ .~?~~ ~ / ~ ~ Cq ~ FAG g ~~,C•,tiCbO `~v725 _iC•r Mi'~Or~S~\ CR~~\: FC.ti~~ S ~,RE ~\\ 9EE ~~z '~"~ VICiNiTY MAP ~<<~ .0. L _, ...,_ _ I.O I C•c F.` ..a ~'~ l:; II 3.00 :~c fZCB a3gg 12 /,. _.•/~ __.V.._.~ ~ ~. 6S, ~.+ 18 ~ ~' F _ ,~ i Sg0 ~~ DEPAP.Th1E:vT OF PL.P~2IING AND ZONING „~= HELENE MAWYER MAP R 86,03-~-3~•3 SPECIAL USE PERMIT Q ~-~•a NORiH 1J x 6 g ~g.~~ " ; „a BIa~ ~ ,_ ~i7= 17 ~ 25 br 4 6~a~ t~~,. 5~ rs z~ 45 B •~ .~ ;256' 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ""~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 27, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: First Reading of Zoning Ordinances; Consent Agenda; Planning Commission Request to Amend Section 30-93- 14 of the Zoning Ordinance pertaining to the Display of Signage at Shopping Centers COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' Since 1992, all Signage at Tanglewood Mall has been nonconforming, as the square footage of displayed Signage exceeds the allowable maximum by 28%. Since this time, new businesses at Tanglewood, which have desired exterior Signage, have requested variances before the BZA. The Planning Commission has been evaluating County sign regulations as they apply to the Tanglewood Mall property, and believes that the regulations should be modified to allow major new anchor stores at the mall to display reasonable Signage. This proposed amendment allows anchor stores to display up to 100 square feet of Signage. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: 1. That the Board of Supervisors hold First Reading of this item on June 27, 1995 and schedule Second Reading and action for July 25, 1995 X^ Respectfully Submitted, i Terrance L 'Harri gtE7ri, A CP Director Planni~ and Zoning Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by ~-~•3 z Approved, ~~~i~'~-~-.C-~,~ ~ ~' ~~~_,d~.~ Elmer C. Hodg County Administrator Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens Vote No Yes Abs ~~' -3 SEC. 30-93 SIGNS Sec. 30-93-14 Special Signage Districts and Regulations (B) Shopping Centers Within shopping center square footage that existed prior to the adoption of this ordinance, new or existing businesses may modify or replace their existing attached signs provided the area of the modified or new signage is equal to or less than the original displayed signage. Modifications to freestanding signs shall be in accord with the district regulations. 10~ dross flppr ~re~ Qf ~2,(3ad square f~ei -and the sign displayed sha be located a minimum of 300 feet from the closest public right-of-way. (Amended Ord. 42694-12) In addition, notwithstanding the provisions of Section 30-93-13 (E) 2., within enclosed shopping centers exceeding two hundred fifty thousand (250,000) gross floor area, businesses that request sign permits for lots that meet or exceed their allowable sign allocation shall be allowed a maximum of one hundred (100) square feet of signage, AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 27, 1995 ORDINANCE 62795-2 APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR TIIE 1995-96 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET FOR ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA WHEREAS, upon notice duly published in the newspaper, a public hearing was held on May 23, 1995, concerning the adoption of the annual budget for Roanoke County for fiscal year 1995-96; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, approved said budget on June 13, 1995, pursuant to the provisions of Section 13.02 of the Roanoke County Charter and Chapter 4 of Title 15.1 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this appropriation ordinance was held on June 13, 1995, and the second reading of this ordinance was held on June 27, 1995, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the following appropriations are hereby made from the respective funds for the period beginning July 1, 1995, and ending June 30, 1996, for the functions and purposes indicated: .~= i County of Roanoke Proposed FY 1995-96 Budget June 27,1995 Revenues: General Fund: General Government $ 89,379,898 Youth Haven II 387,247 Comprehensive Services 1,126,122 Law Library 41,980 Recreation Fee Class 616,763 Internal Sen~ices 1,461,964 Garage II 257,278 Total General Fund $ 93,271,252 Debt Service Fund $ 8,706,612 Capital Projects Fund $ 575,000 Internal Service Fund -Risk Management $ 1,169,996 Water Fund: Water Operations $ 9,616,728 1991 Water Revenue Bonds 164,621 Water Repair and Replacement 350,000 Other 574,054 Water Surplus 743,059 Total Water Fund $ 11,448,462 Sewer Fund: Sewer Operations $ 5,002,266 Sewer Repair and Replacement 348,889 Total Sewer Fund $ 5,351,155 School Funds: Operating $ 76,103,239 Cafeteria 2,995,000 Grant 1,652,032 Textbook 777,283 Other 1,500,000 Total School Fund $ 83,027,554 Total All Funds $ 203,550,031 06/19/95 11:23 AM m:\finance\budget\book-wk\APPROP96.WK4 ~i County of Roanoke Proposed FY 1995-96 Budget June 27,1995 Expenditures: General Government: General Administration Board of Supervisors County Administrator Community Relations Asst. Co. Administrators Property Management Human Resources County Attorney Economic Development Total General Administration Constitutional Officers Treasurer Commonwealth Attorney Victim/Witness Commissioner of the Revenue Clerk of the Circuit Court Sheriffs Office Care & Confinement of Prisoners Total Constitutional Officers Judicial Administration Circuit Court General District Court Magistrate J & DR Court Court Service Unit Total Judicial Administration Management Services County Assessor Financial Planning Public Transportation Management and Budget Procurement Services Total Management Services $ 223,807 185,385 109,839 280,401 80,403 358,236 285,471 646,691 $ 2,170,233 $ 526,310 448,765 5,048 550,103 651,280 1,052,533 2,858,140 $ 6,092,179 $ 101,626 34,083 1,255 10,429 172,385 $ 319,778 $ 626,463 616,442 70,200 108,152 269,518 $ 1,690,775 06/19/95 11:23 AM m:\finance\budget\book-wk\APPROP96.WK4 ~~ County of Roanoke Proposed FY 1995-96 Budget June 27,1995 Public Safety Police $ 5,025,520 Transportation Safety Commission 960 E911 Maintenance 423,717 Fire and Rescue 3,799,103 Total Public Safety $ 9,249,300 Community Services General Services $ 456,484 Solid Waste 3,320,934 Engineering and Inspections 2,420,711 Building Maintenance 1,309,483 Planning and Zoning 460,249 Planning Commission 20,612 Total Community Services $ 7,988,473 Human Services Grounds Maintenance $ 1,328,057 Parks and Recreation 1,217,725 Public Health 425,333 Social Services Administration 2,156,828 Public Assistance 952,400 Institutional Care 30,500 Social Service Organizations 119,332 Contributions Human Service Organizations 82,213 Contributions Cultural Organizations 178,526 Library 1,485,404 VPI Extension 70,420 Elections 197,499 Total Human Services $ 8,244,237 Non-Departmental Employee Benefits $ 1,945,000 Miscellaneous 879,640 Venture Capital 25,000 Internal Service Charges 1,063,713 Total Non-Departmental $ 3,913,353 06/19/95 11:23 AM m:\finance\budget\book-wk\APPROP96.WK4 County of Roanoke Proposed FY 1995-96 Budget June 27,1995 Transfers to Other Funds Transfer to Debt -General Transfer to Debt Service -School Transfer to Capital Transfer to Schools Transfer to Schools -Capital Transfer to Schools -Dental Insurance Transfer to Internal Services Transfer to Comprehensive Services Transfer to Garage II Transfer to Youth Haven II Total Transfers to Other Funds Unappropriated Balance Board Contingency Addition to Fund Balance Total General Government Youth Haven II Comprehensive Services Law Library Recreation Fee Class Internal Services Management Information Systems Communications Total Internal Services Garage II Total General Fund $ 3,624,207 1,868,697 575,000 39,419,760 1,850,000 260,932 1,169,996 313,015 100,000 25,000 $ 49,206,607 $ 100,000 404,963 $ 89,379,898 $ 387,247 $ 1,126,122 $ 41,980 $ 616,763 $ 914,301 547,663 $ 1,461,964 $ 257,278 $ 93,271,252 Debt Service Fund $ 8,706,612 Capital Projects Fund $ 575,000 06/19/95 11:23 AM m:\finance\budget\book-wk\APPROP96.WK4 .~ . i County of Roanoke Proposed FY 1995-96 Budget June 27,1995 Internal Services Fund -Risk Management $ 1,169,996 Water Fund: Water Operations $ 9,616,728 1991 Water Revenue Bonds 164,621 Water Repair and Replacement 350,000 Other 574,054 Water Surplus 743,059 Total Water Fund $ 11,448,462 Sewer Fund: Sewer Operations $ 5,002,266 Sewer Repair and Replacement 348,889 Total Sewer Fund $ 5,351,155 School Funds: Operating $ 76,103,239 Cafeteria 2,995,000 Grant 1,652,032 Text Book 777,283 Other 1,500,000 Total School Funds $ 83,027,554 Total All Funds $ 203.550,031 06/19/95 11:23 AM m:\finance\budget\book-wk\APPROP96.WK4 2. That the County Administrator may authorize or delegate the authorization of the transfer of any unencumbered balance or portion thereof from one department to another within a fund. 3. That all funded outstanding encumbrances, both operating and capital, at June 30, 1995, are reappropriated to the 1995-96 fiscal year to the same department and account for which they are encumbered in the previous year. 4. That appropriations designated for capital projects will not lapse at the end of the fiscal year but shall remain appropriated until the completion of the project or until the Board of Supervisors, by appropriate action, changes or eliminates the appropriation. Upon completion of a capital project, staff is authorized to close out the project and transfer to the funding source any remaining balances. This section applies to appropriations for Capital Projects at June 30, 1995, and appropriations in the 1995-96 budget. 5. That all school fund appropriations remaining at the end of the 1994-95 fiscal year not lapse but shall be appropriated to the School Capital Improvements Fund in fiscal year 1995-96. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: Supervisor Eddy A COPY TESTS: Brenda J. Holto ,Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: W. Brent Robertson, Budget Manager Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney D. Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant Administrator Don C. Myers, Assistant Administrator ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~" I AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 27, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Second Reading of the Fiscal Year 1995-96 Budget Appropriation Ordinance. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SiTMMARY OF INFORMATION: The 1995-96 fiscal year budget was presented to the Board of Supervisors on May 9, 1995. A budget public hearing was held on May 23, 1995 to receive written and oral comment from the public concerning the proposed budget. Attached for your approval is the 1995-96 fiscal year Budget Appropriation Ordinance. The total County budget is $203,550,031. This includes all interfund and intrafund transfers. The budget net of transfers is $147,564,233. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The format of the Appropriation Ordinance was changed several years ago to conform with the reporting basis used at year-end in the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. The FY 1995-96 Appropriation Ordinance, as presented, is consistent with that change in format. This presentation allows the same level of budget comparison as is required by Generally Accepted Accounting Principles for financial reporting purposes. The revised format will also more consistently apply the appropriation on a fund basis for County Funds as has been used to appropriate School Funds in the past. Staff recommends approval of the second reading of the 1995-96 fiscal year Budget Appropriation Ordinance. Staff also recommends approval of the attached Classification Plan for fiscal year 1995-96. There have been no changes proposed since the first reading on June 13, 1995. Respectfully submitted, W . Brent Robert n Budget Manager Appro d by, ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ..~'..1 ACTION VOTE Approved () Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied () Eddy _ _ _ Received O Johnson _ Referred O Kohinke _ _ To () Minnix _ _ Nickens _ _ _ ~i AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 27, 1995 ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR THE 1995-96 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET FOR ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA WHEREAS, upon notice duly published in the newspaper, a public hearing was held on May 23, 1995, concerning the adoption of the annual budget for Roanoke County for fiscal year 1995-96; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, approved said budget on June 13, 1995, pursuant to the provisions of Section 13.02 of the Roanoke County Charter and Chapter 4 of Title 15.1 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this appropriation ordinance was held on June 13, 1995, and the second reading of this ordinance was held on June 27, 1995, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the following appropriations are hereby made from the respective funds for the period beginning July 1, 1995, and ending June 30, 1996, for the functions and purposes indicated: i County of Roanoke Proposed FY 1995-96 Budget June 27,1995 Revenues: General Fund: General Government $ 89,379,898 Youth Haven II 387,247 Comprehensive Services 1,126,122 Law Library 41,980 Recreation Fee Class 616,763 Internal Services 1,461,964 Garage II 257,278 Total General Fund $ 93,271,252 Debt Service Fund $ 8,706,612 Capital Projects Fund $ 575,000 Internal Service Fund -Risk Management $ 1,169,996 Water Fund: Water Operations $ 9,616,728 1991 Water Revenue Bonds 164,621 Water Repair and Replacement 350,000 Other 574,054 Water Surplus 743,059 Total Water Fund $ 11,448,462 Sewer Fund: Sewer Operations $ 5,002,266 Sewer Repair and Replacement 348,889 Total Sewer Fund $ 5,351,155 School Funds: Operating $ 76,103,239 Cafeteria 2,995,000 Grant 1,652,032 Textbook 777,283 Other 1,500,000 Total School Fund $ 83,027,554 Total All Funds $ 203,550,031 06/19/95 11:23 AM m:\finance\budget\book-wk\APPROP96.WK4 ~' County of Roanoke Proposed FY 1995-96 Budget June 27,1995 Expenditures: General Government: General Administration Board of Supervisors $ 223,807 County Administrator 185,385 Community Relations 109,839 Asst. Co. Administrators 280,401 Property Management 80,403 Human Resources 358,236 County Attorney 285,471 Economic Development 646,691 Total General Administration $ 2,170,233 Constitutional Officers Treasurer $ 526,310 Commonwealth Attorney 448,765 Victim/Witness 5,048 Commissioner of the Revenue 550,103 Clerk of the Circuit Court 651,280 Sheriffs Office 1,052,533 Care & Confinement of Prisoners 2,858,140 Total Constitutional Officers $ 6,092,179 Judicial Administration Circuit Court $ 101,626 General District Court 34,083 Magistrate 1,255 J & DR Court 10,429 Court Service Unit 172,385 Total Judicial Administration $ 319,778 Management Services County Assessor $ 626,463 Financial Planning 616,442 Public Transportation 70,200 Management and Budget 108,152 Procurement Services 269,518 Total Management Services $ 1,690,775 06/19/95 11:23 AM m:\finance\budget\book-wk\APPROP96.WK4 ~- i County of Roanoke Proposed FY 1995-96 Budget June 27,1995 Public Safety Police $ 5,025,520 Transportation Safety Commission 960 E911 Maintenance 423,717 Fire and Rescue 3,799,103 Total Public Safety $ 9,249,300 Community Services General Services $ 456,484 Solid Waste 3,320,934 Engineering and Inspections 2,420,711 Building Maintenance 1,309,483 Planning and Zoning 460,249 Planning Commission 20,612 Total Community Services $ 7,988,473 Human Services Grounds Maintenance $ 1,328,057 Parks and Recreation 1,217,725 Public Health 425,333 Social Services Administration 2,156,828 Public Assistance 952,400 Institutional Care 30,500 Social Service Organizations 119,332 Contributions Human Service Organizations 82,213 Contributions Cultural Organizations 178,526 Library 1,485,404 VPI Extension 70,420 Elections 197,499 Total Human Services $ 8,244,237 Non-Departmental Employee Benefits $ 1,945,000 Miscellaneous 879,640 Venture Capital 25,000 Internal Service Charges 1,063,713 Total Non-Departmental $ 3,913,353 06/19/95 11:23 AM m:\finance\budget\book-wk\APPROP96.WK4 ~- County of Roanoke Proposed FY 1995-96 Budget June 27,1995 Transfers to Other Funds Transfer to Debt -General $ 3,624,207 Transfer to Debt Service -School 1,868,697 Transfer to Capital 575,000 Transfer to Schools 39,419,760 Transfer to Schools -Capital 1,850,000 Transfer to Schools -Dental Insurance 260,932 Transfer to Internal Services 1,169,996 Transfer to Comprehensive Services 313,015 Transfer to Garage II 100,000 Transfer to Youth Haven II 25,000 Total Transfers to Other Funds $ 49,206,607 Unappropriated Balance Board Contingency $ 100,000 Addition to Fund Balance 404,963 Total General Government $ 89,379,898 Youth Haven II $ 387,247 Comprehensive Services $ 1,126,122 Law Library $ 41,980 Recreation Fee Class $ 616,763 Internal Services Management Information Systems $ 914,301 Communications 547,663 Total Internal Services $ 1,461,964 Garage II Total General Fund Debt Service Fund Capital Projects Fund $ 257,278 $ 93,271,252 $ 8,706,612 $ 575,000 06/19/95 11:23 AM m:\finance\budget\book-wk\APPROP96.WK4 ~.i County of Roanoke Proposed FY 1995-96 Budget June 27,1995 Internal Services Fund -Risk Management $ 1,169,996 Water Fund: Water Operations $ 9,616,728 1991 Water Revenue Bonds 164,621 Water Repair and Replacement 350,000 Other 574,054 Water Surplus 743,059 Total Water Fund $ 11,448,462 Sewer Fund: Sewer Operations $ 5,002,266 Sewer Repair and Replacement 348,889 Total Sewer Fund $ 5,351,155 School Funds: Operating $ 76,103,239 Cafeteria 2,995,000 Grant 1,652,032 Text Book 777,283 Other 1,500,000 Total School Funds $ 83,027,554 Total All Funds $ 203,550,031 06/19/95 11:23 AM m:\finance\budget\book-wk\APPROP96.WK4 ~•~- I ''~..~ 2. That the County Administrator may authorize or delegate the authorization of the transfer of any unencumbered balance or portion thereof from one department to another within a fund. 3. That all funded outstanding encumbrances, both operating and capital, at June 30, 1995, are reappropriated to the 1995-96 fiscal year to the same department and account for which they are encumbered in the previous year. 4. That appropriations designated for capital projects will not lapse at the end of the fiscal year but shall remain appropriated until the completion of the project or until the Board of Supervisors, by appropriate action, changes or eliminates the appropriation. Upon completion of a capital project, staff is authorized to close out the project and transfer to the funding source any remaining balances. This section applies to appropriations for Capital Projects at June 30, 1995, and appropriations in the 1995-96 budget. 5. That all school fund appropriations remaining at the end of the 1994-95 fiscal year not lapse but shall be appropriated to the School Capital Improvements Fund in fiscal year 1995- 96. ~i W Z Q ~~.. O O V Z Z 0 ~ ~ Q J ~- ~ G~ V >- ~ .~ ~ ~ J Q Z ~ ...~ V W V O W Z Q u. 0 I-- W G C. W F.. m 0 W Q a. W ~, ..~ .~ ~, A b v N U .,~ W N O W a 0 U N x 0 C ro 0 a w o w U ~ a ~~ a x ~+ 0 ~ ~ W ~ ~. .O ~ rl mb U ~~ ~ ~ w3 ~ N ~ ~ -.1 w3 U 0 a~ ~ .~ ~ ao vw w~ ~~ U ~ .d q W -a -'' ~ w~ a ~ ~ O mw ro ~~ U N ~~ 0 v~ -.1 b ~ rox .-1 am ro o~ rorn U r-I .,~ W •.1 .-i m U ~ ro .~ Uh m t0 r-1 E W r O o~ z o~ m M ~ -.~ N b ~ a i ~ o a~ m a .,~ •.1 O ~ ~ ~ ~~ ro a~ w a i ~ U Sd ~0 •.1 U N -~ °4 +~ v a ~~ ~ b m ~ a ro ~ - i a ix ~ A Sao N M a -, e +• H k ~ ~ O N za .. O z a ~- ro •.~ s.. ~ +°~ o 1~ W .G •-~ ~ b Co H U r7 W v C9 U ~ uOi NMNN.-1 W N O o~ z 0 N M a4 v c Ol a a, M 10 W O N O H ~[1 U H n > N --r C ~ ~ ° ~ a i ~ i ~ ro a ~ m~wx ~ .+ •a a ro a-'~ - ~ ~, .~ ro A U GIN O O ~ ~ A V IUE~v i~ N X N G ^O z Q ^ 'd' E ~ ~ .~ .-. X O E ~ a +~ c U x ~. ° E w z a c xw--oo ~z o~~ H H . z O.k>x vz ~ o ~ a i ao +~ ~ U m HU f0 -a xs~o~ o ~ ~ux . ~ a~ xUmwa ~ ~ ro~,~ +~ NxNS~O •r1 .--I b L1 O Sd ~ E UHHUC9 W dl ro No~oao O O~NOQO C9 U ~-I N N DD O~ NI~~UO1 W MI z° o~ ~I N M U ro o~ ~ 3 b ~ •.+ ~ .-~ a 0 0 m ro r U ~ M -.1 U U! ~ ~ a i a E ~ ~ro~~ ~ o a~~a a -- ~ a i a W N C x O N za v ° +~ z ~ v -1 • ~ ~ O O! .x S.i xs+w ~ o3Q z wa _ H ~ N b U ~ N U ~ R O W Q W O .~ •rl 1~ z~ma o ~ -a ~' ~ ~ a i a~ v •am-.,m ~ ~ ~~x +1 ~ W •.1 L.1 O --1 O Ol 1~ b ~ F UC4D W W N 'O O d' to O O V' O O ri Ch U ~~~~ S~ d~ M 0 M N H 14 O~ N O~ .~ 0 a a M 0 ~o .~ -, z M E W 0 z C N E s~ ro U) a N .~ .~ -~~ ~I H w ~I ~I ~~~~~ e-1 m N U .,.1 > S.1 N tOA G1 ~ ~ m rl m rororo 3~3 b °~ .~ m .~ ~on~voi ~~~ mmm m a~ a~ a~ N U U U •.1 > > > > L1 1.1 Sd >•+ w w a~ Ul V1 to U] >r ~ .-1 .~ r-1 s+~rororo roros~sa~ f.l -a a- a~ w A U q C C •.1 O N t>l p1 1•amc~oc~ a _ E v +~ k a v aEi o a aki z x-•z°--o c wvam oE1+Es+ zwala~v --xx x a a~ ro a~ o +~a~a~ ao~+os'a roz.~zo ~ -- ro -- ~ m m 01 H .i ~ O m C O o ro roU ~ +~ 'O N row~oom A U .-i m W -~a,o~v aa~nUa r-1 O~ 00 01 N O .-1 ~O O~ O t~ 01 00 V' IA ~o w .. eN N H PC N ~o N O N 0 a Q H M M ~o .~ M x M ~.' N .~ w E W O z 1~ C N E +~ ro 0 a~ r-1 W .,, H .U O U °~I r•1 N r•1 N 'i r•1 N r-1 '•i M N M N ~•-I M M '•i r•1 l0 V' d' M 111 M N m O .,.1 U U R •~ C O a ro •.1 ~ c ~ m w a~ ro ~ a i ~ W 41 U a U v aaa ~~ ° ~ ~a a a • O v o o .a b+ m N N E O U .~ ~ m ro Ol .a r-1 c c 0 0 ro m •a ~•' ~.- ~' v ~ `~ as ~ •~ °° ro m N W N O 'O W W m N .-~ >r 01 m f.l >~ 01 W N b O O m is ro +~ U N 01 ~J 1.a 1.1 U U -.r N m > 1..1 'O 1.1 f.l ~ 41 1~ r•1 > -.1 W .-~ N N a w ~, a s o+ a~ w w a s •.+ >.~ >„ •.+ a s a m o >ro oo " [ 'o c n •.. is~, l dsa~a~~ viwa i ~ v~v roams xa>.a1>.,mmmsaroww>.rl a>. w>, roro m s.a U .~ a •a >~ m •a •,., m m e o •,., s, ro~ •., a •,., m m 1.1 l,l q .-i O ro •.1 O~ C~ ro Ol LI O O •,.1 C U > •,.1 C ••1 1.1 1.1 ro•awo o.~+~amoowuro•.+•.I~u1om+1 •-+~ roro awoa a+axwaUUaHawwx~rnAx w] aa a~ a v E •~ O! ~ W _ +1 _ p ~ , ~. A O E a E +, >r z a, x X E a a i a i v H ~ z °az ox z ~~ a° ~ .r E z o X~ ~ ~ m E i H a ro w~ ~ a i 11 x a i m ° ~ H zwa ° x z a i x z +~ b ~ v o w z ~ ~x w x a i a i H w x H aHa~ Ua~ ~a i wa ~ ~~~ ~U U40 N•~ ~ O ro ro v m >a~ m-.o~zaw N m W W~ A 7 ro U •I 1.1 1a G ! U E m m !C ro Ul U 1 .1 r-1 J-1 +~ U ~ mrov >aU aHa H~ aw ~~ a ~ O O rl d' N tD O '•1 f~ 10 ~O "1 ~ 'i .i N N O O ri O N ' rINN NN Md' d'l11 l~ N f+1 r•1 N N r•1 m w .~ U .-1 •.1 .i -.~ "~ ~ •.I D rd •.1 ro ~1 \ \ V] W W W U -W-1 -w.l •W.1 ~ .-1 01 d W •U a° vi ai vii voi amio+-.~ U ~ a ++ a E U C X N X x vmiacaXi~ ~ ~ o z° o z° GN +~ H M (L N LI ~ owx~v o -.~ X s~ ro •a ~ mw a~ s,~ U -.a ....-~ W > U am m .~ ~ o a~ O mU410~ a -°a -.~++ ~ x vi ~oa.•+ U N '•1 1.1 ro ~ ~ •' ~ •V a° v ~vc°n ~ ~••1 P7 M U1 ~ O O ~ M l~ 00 00 00 O~ t!' N E W ~I z M ~I N H 14 N NI ~i z E ?~ >. M yl j! ~J a ro .-~ .~ ~ o ~a r-1 l~ M N .~•1 O~ rl ~-i N r•1 ~-1 N U C ro c w N m +~ ~ c m co ro •-~ •-~ 3 ro~ ~ U 'O ~ N •a c a .-+ om o •.1 c to ~1 H \ ro m a~ ~ a~ 1a ~ U U ro •.1 N °~ ~ •Sd ~ ~r ~r ro N ?~.-I 1~ 17 N 1~ ro •,., •a m o •a ~, •,., •,., s+ o+•a c +~ +r roc +~ w ooawoc~ +~ a E o i k ~, a ~o ~ z ^ ~ a •a x i H a ~ ~ u1 U O ~ xa~ zs+ C Ei ... ~ ~ r+ oc aro zo ~~ ~ z O LL +~ +~ ~ s+aEUa z be k a a iw a~aoa~~ o z ~ ~w N S.I ••1 U S.I ~ N ~ O O a m~ m en O .r H 3 U ~ ~ W N 't3 00 O N [~ C7 U ~~ ~~ ~~ s~ sr O O 00 UU ~~ .,., .., O ~ U U ~ w .,~ .,r UU ~ N N ~~ ~ ~ ~ W W ~-+ O O ~ xx m a~'i w .c .-i .-i to U U a x m N U .,.r ld GI N ro .., U 0 W E s+ W m -~ o ~°+ m aEi ~ z_ro b x ~ ~ S.I W U O U W x ° a z a ax, a° w o ~ ~ z ~ w--m-.~~.... ~'tr~~~wo~w N W N G N U O! r-1 bNOX1mWw~NU -~~ccowwcw amoooo~+o wroz-~z Uzi a3--~..~ ~"v~i s~~ m ~,+~ +°'+ r+ w a s o .`FO. VO] U UO' A W Q~ ~-1 V' d' OD U'1 Ori O OO N ~ U) 41 01 O~ 01 r•I E W o z° ~0 ~0 N H 04 m E v m W c O .,., ro E a~ o M W M c H N NH ~ ~ z E E o s~+ rn acs ro ~ ~ o ~ N r•1 r-1 .~i r-1 Z7+ c .a C 7 0 U U ~ m ro Ol ~ U 11 •.~ U 0~! V1 U G1 Ol w .-1 c U U•a ro ro •a •,., w •,., C .-1 .~ O! U •aoo.co waav~ti a _ N ~ E ~ w a i ~ m ° k M ~ z i a .-~ ~., W ~. r. c o cn k +~ o ~ ~z ao c ~ ~ °i °z x s~ ~ v C U ~ Es+oa~ro z ° x c a o~ - ~ H -.1 11 +1 O 'Cf O! > O ~ ~ ~ W U aoU~ EU•-++~~ a~ b+ om~ 1~ O 7r SJ U ~ H ~ w 3~ W Ul 'CS r-1 01 00 OD U' U N Nrt~ M ~' ~r .-+ m m W O U o •.~ •.1 > ~ ~ row a~ c .a oro •U 00 U to ~ ^ a~i E oe zz H .... H 3.1 H a~ U 0! •a 'O w~ O m c U O •' row ~N ~ b a U VO] H ~ ~'1 N 00 0~ ri ~-1 .•i .~-1 .-I .-1 H N ~••I r•1 N r•I r•1 r•i .-1 d' ''•1 r-1 H d' T E W c0 O o+ z o~ N N m E +~ Ol N O m O c G+23 c UI V] N W •-1 W N c N N c'C c U ~ a oaa om ~m a, c N A W N U N d m a '~' u~~ ~w c> H m ~o O w O w w .~ E ro~ 'O N ~, ~m o woo roa- zoo c v m a a~ a~ c s~ rr m ro •.+ c > U Sd H 3•I LI 1J ro X > O M O! •,a N 11 O! N c c m 1~ b~ S,1 -rl N 1~ A > c c 1~ c c W ro •.I c ~ Ol +~ c ~,~, ow coo s+U~ aa~ •.~ m ro H v u a~ ro •.+ E a- •.+ •a a- ~ ~ ~ E s+ U z E w -a v~ La m N E m m fa N W Cl C~ N >~ ~ >r >. •~ w +~ e~wE +~ mss u~mm ono 0o vw ros~s~c o ~+ v •.+ o c m •a a o+•.+ •a m c c c~ c •.+ s~ ro ro E~ A ro ~ m o E O+ E o ~~~ aroi q C a> ~a cA~ E H a~ o .c U o v o s+ ro o o ~ •,.i •.+ •a a~ c ,~ a~ -.+ •.+ o ~ A av~wxa Uw ~U~ Hww wA wx c7aaU ,-, ~ w ~, ^ -- a ~ m m ~ E k a i +~ ~ ec a ^wa ia ~ -- a o v E m x E c c •.+ a o v o -- ~ z ~l N^ •~ N N •~ O c E N DC z H o~ >~ ~ ~O K~ > c X'O z~ N~ N~~.IH ~+ ro O N GL la O N Sd ~- U DC c c m ro s~ s~U c E a~ z c o v w w o.x ro s~ -+ ~ a~ o o w a --o o ~H cn z w++v W c 1~ m Z iC O z U O O c ~ 41 m U s, v row -- a~ w H -- +~ O+ z ro ~ -.1 -.a v ~ c o c H m roc -- c o U m w G- ^ •^1 •.a r+ LI O .x ^ H H Gl ^ c ••1 .-. 0) .. -.1 m W -~ to w w 'd > w O z ~+ +~ H U JJ •.1 c 11 N 1~ J•~ c m µ' O x cas~s~a~~-a~axH-.+a~o avcaro+~ ~ m roE OwEro ~E sr >E~N E•a•.~E.cc>.m ~ > ~-01 0(AWLIHUN N.s'S•1O10 0l~roNU O1.1c •.1 m k U iC G1 H k .-I N Ol k O 'O k ~ DC G1 0 ro O ++ •.+w +~a~aHww Ua~~a~UC roO+ a~zv~,•.+ ro mc kcco ++c ~ c ro ccs~c u.a++ ~ mo roa~o xroo s~U.~oa~ o•-+a~o+~~•.~ro a+ ~z E+EZb+S•~+-z N roznrn zs+++zc ao v •-~ ?~ a~ s+ ~+ r+ w a a n ro •.~ a~ 3 E s+ ~, c a~ c +~ E~ oU mac sic cap arooo +~ E a Uo Exro a-nc mro rnm c.nc~ ~ H 4 A O a UE 0 H O i ~ G 4 E+~fa a W3 wavic i w o 'O ~D .-1 N [~ 00 N UI t+1 t~ d' ~ ri t!1 .-1 a0 00 M ~ O O .-I C7 M O ~-1 .-~ N N iN d' .•1 O N O O~ O lA C1 U r•1 H ri ~••1 N N N N N N N ~ V' d' 111 ~O [~ l~ ~~•+~~r rn~+M~ W n O a~ z M O~ N N ~ U C O O Ol •.1 •.1 ~ ~ ~ c roro b+ •a O! N ~ ~ U U as ~ o ~a a o U .•~ O O U GO •.-I •.1 ~ C m ~ b O N ro U S.1 1.1 to H ~ ~ ~ •~ U U C H N ~ w aa ~ a i w ~ v a r+U m ~v ro > E~ E H ~ z i~..~ a roroax ~ +~ U ++ ro o a m a ~b ~ o ~ . a i x.x + + H m o • ~ o ~ v - i + ,a i mro o z A Uwac~ waUa~ ~ E O! W W ~ -~ a ~ a eza ~ z N E l+ D o c~ x ~ a i w H o z C 03 ~ ~ c saH b -+ •a z ro m b ~ N O U f.r G U ON ro ~ w -, --. W E ~"'~ 7UH cy ro+-o m O ~+ O rl L1 J.1 ~ ~ E m 7 ~ ~ ~ r-1 O ~ Gl U Ol C O +~ ao+~-.~x wxoUa ~+ ro ro a~ a a~ •a ~ o~s~za a~u~o~ ~aQ z ~zo ,e+ ow o ~r. m ro.r.axr. o N O W ~ 0 H -. -1 ~ ~ ~ H Ha 3 i W ~ UC7 W Ul 'O r-1 r•1 M 01 r-1 O f'~1 O C9 U .-1 N d' ~O n l~ p i .a w .d C 7 w C 5 N ri 'i r°I LfI fh d' O~ .-i W ~ O ~o z O O M M >4 a~ v ~a ~ N Cl O N 01 W U a as m O 1.a N W •.1 ~ i~ 1~ 11 U ~ • ~ O ' W W - 1 10 `~ O O U O ~ ~ U C • N 1~ r•1 UJ C ~ l~ 1~ 3.1 ~ a ro oo ro wro W W W ••I •.1 U W V! U E 3 o m m •a O .,~ ~~ O f•+ O b ~ U .x ro~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v o o .-°1a 0 ~ A U AO U U U a U u1 U m to O ~ GL ~ > a i w x a ~ ~~ w k ~ '-~+ ~ ~ i a a --O N O UO Ew ~ E N z w ~ ro ~ a i w w _ O W m U C ~ n i z p~ ~. °~ a z a, Zvi ~ s~ ro ~- ~- -~ N U -~ O O ~ N 3a .~. z ~. o a ro a ms +~ A, a~ a H ~++~ E a~ 0 8 ro•.+E+~ E o m~ ~ ro W U•~I N U C N•~ N3 C N ~x x av x•a ~ x~ x o x a~~, ~+w wros~a~a a~Ua~~.•aa~ a•.+oao~as~o+~+~o U ~+ U o .~ 0 0 0 •.+ o -a ro o Z z ~ ~ ~ ~ UZUZ~ oz v ~ A U~ UU i W ~1 a ~ ~ -a aJ w ro~ 0- o v .--r o 'i H ~lA Faq as A WU W N I b 00 O~ N f'~1 N 111 M !~ r•1 U ~~ M M H M C7 ~. -~ a 0o i~ 0 rn O U1 N .-1 N ~-1 r-1 l!1 e•i .1 e-1 lf1 .-i r-1 O ••i E r-1 ri W O z v N t'~ 1 N ~ ~ U a a ro a N ma o • ro •a z ~ ~ a O! U! b+ a- E a v m rn am m ro H\ O 41 m ~ O U 0 0 0 Gl W H O U ~ ro •.1 U U U U U H w o s+ x ~ v m > b+s., mmm •a •.~ a~ww>>~ c ~ ° m a a °1 aaa~+~+a, m v , v E ~ v +~ \ a m ~+ v v ~o vi vi ro w w .a ~. a a a x o +~ ~ >~ w U w ro w ro ro ro.a.~ + .~ a a a~ •a ro ro .c ~ E ro ~ e+a •as~s~s~oU0 v o ~ v •,., a w +, •,., •a •,., o 0 0 o U x a w wc~ xwwwv~cna. ~ ~ ~ E ~ a i a E X E a w as x c x ~ ~ a a E ° a i ~ c z --~ ro E ~ U a o --+- o ~ o~aa z ~' % 0o a i w cro roo ia i o roawro ~+w zU11•.101dHro w m O x •-+ o --.-+ ass z o m a ~aOiwWw vv ~ E ov3om + a a i +~ aaw a aaa roUxos~>~.-~a ro^ro E U s~~n-,aro-•-a a~ vU o~ a~ E z ~ + amUw~,~,aac~a•a oEro.-+aU m E •a \w ro a E H~ E ~+ m z a~ b+•a ~\ •a k m a ° a~ k a v ° , a x v~ m+~ ~ t i a •~+w ~ E a~•o v a~ O ro v v ro s~>.m o~ E ~ W++~+O+a •a~a ,~w41~O1•aWG! o .axrooroo ~ o wro.~ >.1EX ~z dw+~oaz Utrz a.~Aawow ~- a -- m U ro~- Oar- >~ a tr rC H x -- ~ a w z s~ •.~ ~ ~ •.a U s~ w o o ,~ ~ •,., w\~ o a ~ •,., m .-~ at m .-~ ~ w ar ro O •,., O a a w ro ~ o• a ° ao H a i w a i ~ ~aab~a i~ , a a a Uao owwAwcnc~ a, ~a T1 O ~t' O N t'~1 t0 N ' r+1 ~ t!I d' OD O CO r•1 N C U - d M ON MOc+1d0r•1N00 J 1 r ~ 'i N V' V' V' tp 00 00 O~ O~ O~ W ~ O M z 0 M m a O M .,~ /4 ,~ ro U •,a a O mmm m m aooo 0 00 .,..r •,~ •,..~ •,.{ •,~ ...1 U a U U U U U O o aaa s+ a av ° oaaa + ~ a ca ro~ H H H H H\ 1.1 m ~ m ro a a a a a U in •.+ ~ ro ro ro ro ro •.+ N ~w~aa c ~ ++ ~a i ro ~ _ `~ v \ ~, ~ s~ s~ s~ \ o s+ +~aaaa a asp •.~ a ro a ro •.~ -a •a •,., •,., a~ ~, ~ o ~ a~~ a w -- ~ ~ aa i ,~ E Q UwWWW W WC7 t/1 >~ O o m m a m w o o a v ao ~ " k a +~ v N\$ k m w--aH O+i o x++vu~a •a~.o •aa ~ v ax aH > s+z a ~ E ~ a E v o a~ o--ro ro w °xozb a • ~ x N z roc c i Ma i N --wz a a• ~, ca a ~o ° b ~ 'a z + s+~++ ~wac i U roooU.a--aEaar-~ ~ +~ m a.r Q! U~ O O.aN+- O fa z w•.+Uaa,a.~UU a Eo Fi ~1 > 41 m ~ E N\Q! m E •~ m ~ Us+aa w >~Haa- H•a N Ol mH'O X 4l a O k > ~naa aGl AEO+•aN ms~ OH.-•~roa a~a+.a aa~ wv~ ro o wx-aroo oa > rrotrz aw~+UZ •.~O •a ~ a •a a -- ro -- v ••+ -- +' v~ .-1 U L ~ U ~ d ~ ~ O a I x ro •a ° ~ ~ •. E 0 S j a~ . ~ . m ~ 0 ~+ H waaawa a wU U w m T1 r O lf1 ~O l~ O~ ~O t+) lfl ~ G'J U N M c~1 r~ th d' ~O 00 .o rn .~ .1 ,~ o+ ~ .~ M o .1 N .-i d' >a O r-i ro ro ro •.+ h h h U ~ ~ ~ ~ w w w w w w w w m •.i •.I •.1 •,.r U C ~ w ~ . . . C O cn v~ cn vJ a NU ~~ O •~ +~ 7 +1 U Qi 3a •.i m m mU ww .C w •Ui •.O~ +~ .C D ~~ ~~ aror w ii vi w ~ ° .~ ~ ~•-~ ~ w U U a° vv c°nai ,.;, +~ a a E +, E w w a ~ -.1 w q ro >c H sa m mom C 0 +~'-wH O a ~~~zr.~ • ° ro mEZ ~ o , [] AwA wm ww~-s~ c w > w o a x m m . i m a is+o a>r~. C RCCmr+-.+ wROU Ews~ 0 0 0 o•a-aca m o+, ox o U UvU NW LE ~v CI ~ ~$ m w i wcwa~o - 2rU a e ~+ >aOS~OSaw d,~s.~~ Emw U ~U roU aU~ +-a r U ~w•a o w ~w ~w ~w i v ~ ~ i~ O m o ~~ E W wWOW1lWw ww•am wsaw~ sr ws+ms~ws+~+ w-.+rocsa wx E w a w a w sr ww aw U+. w e >a ~ w x o,cro.cU.cw owo•.~.-~ ooc>c cn zcn s~W wtnO ZO't33U Z3 ww a v H w v .. .r >. >. ~ ~+ ar w E >. ~ ~ a a a ° a a i i a a a i w o - i a i o ~ ~ ca A a ~A cnw O~ 'i t"1 O ri N 00 .1 O ch O .'1 r-1 N N N d' r-1 N M 00 d0 DO 00 GD 00 00 O~ O~ O~ r-1 N r•1 N r•1 e-1 f7 'i e~1 C7 M r-1 rl d' .-~ E w M 0 M z n M m H ~ W U ~ U ~ C w ro w VI q ~ O O O ~ ~ S a c ~ ~ ~ U ~ a i i a w ~ w .~ a a ~-+ a m a w E~ m m O m 0 0 .C m •.a G R vI c U •a +~ ~R1 H H m H mro ~o W >, m ~, 'O b w b w w M O w m w C C U q U >'a 0~ C~ •a ro ro -.+ ro •.+ U fa 3a .~+ ~ D w o+ w ~+ o w •a o+ o+ >•, rn ~, a N +~ q q~11w q q w A w a o w~ ro o •.+ •,., cn -a m •tt H E •n w~ m ~ ~ ro ~ z a a i >,a i ,~ ~ >,>.a i.•~ H +~ mta~wU w ww ro ~wa-ro ~, O ~+ •a O~ C C •r1 C fa •a •r1 Q >'a m ro H w O >a O w •a G ~ C w +~ +~ g w ro •a z a UaUaw w ~w c~ ~~wc~wa ~ ~ ~, a --;~ o E +~ a +~ w _ a E ro >< -- E w .u c ~ o k c a ~ a - i u z ° >t E k o z N a ° o b c z v c v ~+ 8 -- -~ o a o ~ ~ oar ++ E o a +~ z ro - z --+• -ro ~,~aw zeros--•a-, o~ -- ~+ a s+ >, c U m E sa -- ro E E >•+ >. M aEOs+•-+ ar~.aro Ewarabsa .••. sa Ewmov acnxw aws+>cro>ao o w >c•-+~ sa m w ro~ o w EA++ ~ ~ ><w>bo aaac Eowaw•aro N •.+ w~-s•,mo Hooo arw osaam b q w CU •az•~ >a wz 0 C a os+am .~w--w owU--www RC zwoa3 aro U wUq Ua mwEw--wEs'aw -- aroawaE H wi+ •a o•.+~ Ewo.~ ~+mrocroUwo x m a~ ro trU D aw o~~ as c w E A s+U w aEC~+a~orE ywroo EOw+~wroar~ ~ wwroa•.+~aw roaaU w•a+~c>•+cw+~ Ux~a.~a x H•.+ ~ k+•c•.+owwa •a w m,ro~ E~ w a ~ w w ro•.+ row+~a E `~om nXwo m a a ~ z wi a o .a oa i~ ~k mZm~ WEZ O.GOroza wroroCW •u a ° c w sa.~ ~ ~ ~ s•+a~ o mm +. m a, rn m •a > .~ o ~+ +~ •.+ ro m >a m ° H o ~ a ~ ° o w i a oa o ~ o a h c n c 3~ava~ w w z3 ~nN~ncN a0 No ~ rn~c~~nom O .~ r1 d' .-1 r1 O O .••1 .-i r-1 N .••1 !!1 ri rn CD U r•1 .-1 .-i N N th d• d' V' d' d' U1 If1 t0 t0 n DO r•I d' ~-i r-I 1n r•1 ~ N r•1 .-1 r-i .-i r•I N r-1 r•I ei r•1 ~-•1 r•I E W O O N z M m C O M N •rI 04 U 1.~ c ~ ro U U O m m C c •a •a E E a~ ro c ro ~ ~ ~ a v v m m m •.I }, n n ~ v c c ~ U 3 ~ • v ro a a o v z o ~ o o •a o+ ~ --+ c •.I •.+ .~ ~o c •o '~ m ro o ° a c n a o ro m m m a i m m m M o o a i a i a i m f.l ~ Ol Ol M w W U U S.1 U U U U U ~ C C •.1 •.1 U -.1 01 .-I .--1 .-1 r-1 m •.1 •.~ H H > > N > ro ro ro ro a s•, s+ M +~ a-r ~+ w w a~ ~ h ti h h a~ v c c c cn cn ~v cn C ~ ~ ~ ~ 'O to V! N N Ol A ro w w w w c E E E >+ rl >. r+ ro -•+ >+ >, >+ w w w w ro rl .a r+ ~ W N ++ ro ~ ro ro >r sa s~ N x s, s., sa ~, v •.1 •.+ a ro ro ro .a w ~ w x a~ sa s~ sa •~+ s~ w a~ v v ~, U o a a c •.+ c •.+ c >•, c~ .a ,~ .i ro ~ .~ .c .~ •a o o ~ v ro ro +1 w ~ a~ ro v •,., •.+ •.+ o a cn cn cn cn w cn cn 7E A ~ ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ a ~ a a a a ~ ~ sa sa +~ 0 0 a +~ a. +, E ro ~ ro ~+ 0 0 0 o ° x ac~ I ~ ~ a a ~o o x a.e Eila m >~ E a i > s+ > > > z E s+ o ro v •.+ s~ o o c A rl A A A x 3 ~-~ E 1.a m •.1 la ~••~ ro ~ q z s~ ~ a c as ac ~ o al s+ ~, a >•+E.~~o s+s+s+w sa-a>•+c s~ ro s'• E s+sa s+ ooa oEOEOazUO o M coa~ro~cnowoao>oroos+oa~rooo +. •a o --•.I v •,., a~ •.+ w ---~+ +~ ~ ro +, x .c a +• a+• ~ ++ >,a ++ ..~ ~ .~ +~ x sa ~ m ro.1.1U +1+~ x+I x++A > ro ro cn •.+ row w E m ro a rocn ro a1 ro U ro•.+ row.o ro-a sa m ~ a o al o v U s~ s~ m m N o m --a a~ c m cn m mam -.-I m a m ---.+ m> o cwc Ea~ca~cvca~a~c>ac •.IC ~xoc s~wc~ccc c acs., m ussy o w sao>'a o s'ao++cn asasw c as s~,~w•.Iasas asU ascn as.c mm us c as as •a a>'••a xs+zs+zsa•-+.c axa ~aoro--++aoaca acsaa,aromaa > EO+I wO~-O--O~IO++~Es+E UE~> roECEroEasEasEUE•ausE~ s~ oUro cU U ~ro•.IC000 ~ worows+saoroocoUGHO•.+osaUOm Gl U 1 +1 O I U 1 ~ 1 Uw NU3U x HU >•+ O WU CU NU CU U >U ro-.IU a ~w•.I Zw•aw row•.I w E~ ~ H ~~ s~ m a~as~+~~ro~m~s'a~s~, >~m O +- w .a •- w ~d w •a w w >a >. ~+ ~ +~ ~ ~+ +~ a 0! •~+ O ~ ~ ~- C ~ C ~ c ~- N 1~ A >•+ +1 'O m a •-1 •.+ •.+ w •,., sa •.+ •,., •.+ o a ro a as a o 3> a c a •-I a as a o a rn a •-1 w a >.+ E sa.~ sa ~ s., ro sa mw~ E--I E ++ ESN >~ w E-a E ro E~ E•a E Each E o c a,as ro w a! sa m m~aalo as ~ at sacra asp a! ro a!z as c os~ w m v w v o x.c.c .c ~x~x ro U E x o x ax w~am xz x x•-1 x ro x, x 41x1 x a! •-I wcnas cnrocn•.ICn.a•awwcnw Ew >.~row w>rwrowowcwUrowa +~ -- a a a U •o v v o -- s+ w a -- >. r- c ~- z ---.~ -- w ~- c U -- ro >y >~ >, >~ as s., sa U ro ,~ •a c s., a! •.s a! N ~ ~ ~+ +~ E O 0 W O sa ~ ~o -a ~o m O ~ s+ c U U a a a a >,, c c +. U o c ~ -,., •.I s., ~ -a w U ~+ as as ar as as ro as v .~ •,, •a s~ ro o +• ~ ro o .~ v w o a A A A A a cn cn N H ~ a cn cn ~ w a ~ U a H a w M l0 O N tN N 1~ N ~ 'O cN 01 O ~D 10 N e•i d' to ~O 1~ 1ff .-1 O r•1 .-r r-1 ~o .-1 M O m m O rl N O r-1 .•i O O O in l~ OD 00 00 00 00 O~ 0~ G9 U r-1 r-I V' d' d' ~ ~O ~D !~ l~ n l~ O "° ~t r-1 r•1 ri N ~O M rl N ~••1 cry U1 N 'i '-i N ~••1 ei ~ ~ W W ~o O ~ O a+ z ~o z M Mf O~ rl f+1 d~ >4 -4 y1 Y~ 0 O .~ ., ~ ro h \ w m w U •.1 •.1 S.1 ~ m o ~ a cn m m r-1 U > •.~ > •.+ ro s., U h m \ \ c~ w w m w w ~ U •a •a ro ~ m m U o .n .c o a w w cn ~, a o 0 o ro o m e+ m s., -a s.~ •,., ~ •.a U -.~1 N N > •rl ~-+ A > > U A W tp S.1 ~ 1 N .-. 0 oa ~ ro oa o ~voiiim o ~aEis+ +~ N C E a ~ aUi w m W ~~imC~ U 3~+0> m+~U ro aU~ ~ ~U--m,~ s+a~ oo ~ a a~ as a Ew•az w Ew+ Ew.-~ O E mww--m mw mW ro W m m k •~ •,~ U k •~ k •~ 1+ k ---Eigmm wom~ma++o UztnU Oza~zv]U ~z a .~ a w °~ a° o a° a a w ~ U1 f7 U1 N N U'1 .-i N N In N f~ GO OD 00 00 O~ ~ U C m +• m E b+ •a s~ b+ m C O O O tp •.1 U Ip •.d m C ~ •.+ O IA m O m m m•-+ in > O O ~ N a 0 7 U Y'1 ~1 N ° ~ m m m ~o w °` v m v ~+ M m a m m m .C d~ ~ O •-~ M ~ ~ roa aa~+ M w ro ~ ~ H z m E +i b+~ t~ C G 'C 'O w C q O N z m E w O t7+ C \ w M ~J W •.~ b ro ro M ;.J •.1 m m w o s+ C x o s+ b q U U ••~ a ro .-~ a m m m s~ a ro ~, o •.+ •.+ s~ a ro ro s~ ~+ -+ m ca ro ro r+ ~ m M m m r+ -a •a •r1 .-i w m O ~ 0 0 .~ T a aaw wwU 7E a as a as w s~ s~ 00 ~~ ~ % a O a c ..+ ~ ~ --mv ro N >. a ~+ m 000 m ~+ 1~ UU~CL~O~ ~ o ca~o~~ o m E o+~\m+~+~ ~o am m row k-.+ro N Ekmmwm~m owaaEC00 U~- mmOt•~m \ vakz•.~a aw~oWv~o ~ ° ~ xm~i om ; W awEUm~E mm~mm s~ms+kaa~+k m~ mW m mUW tlJ ro m ~•- C -•+ ° ' ro o~ .~ s + mm~ N -.+ a+ m o -.+ -.a m N H a' a' 'J W W A w m l 'C1 P ~D tp l~ O ~ O .-1 r•1 O ~'1 ~ O G U N M ~O DO 00 0~ w ~ m m a .,., -, s+ E .c +~ o m Ua m k E •> C k +~ ~ a~w ~ z ~ o s + s a ~ m m m n i w w ro m ro s~ oooam>.amm m mtT~mb+U ~ 8 N~ E d w ~ E o ° ° ` '~ ° ` z c ~ ~c ~ i c ~ i o M (~ \ m\ w m\ W ~ Ua ma3.1W GL-•~ro .~EOE•-~+~E~+U +~ mw mw ro m m•.+ kCkwla k~'O W W WO mW[A ~ ~ m x o U q ~ ~ s., •,.r -a -a ~ ~ e+f ~ ~ O O m N H U N as a w ~ ~ ~ ~~ rn O ~'1 N lA lA Qe C7 U ~ r1 rn ~ ~d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m r-~ f.' r•1 .-~ ~•-~ •.1 O •.1 .-~ ...~ .,-1 > .,~ > .,~ h h U b U h \ \ \ U \ \ W W W •.1 w W w w w q w w •,., •,., •.a a •.+ .,., x x ~ ~ x ~ V1 tI] VI U VJ VI a E a a i o ~ ~ o •. + o ~ +~ o a -a > s.. z •a m •,., a m .- A ~+ > U O ~ ~ Q ~ U ~ U 1 f -r i U -~ 4 A ~--oa~ wos++~s~a w+~•a E~ w+i•a ao 0 ~ E U X b O~ U~ U U ~, w w m a~ m qw yew ~ roxs~ao~ awa~a~a~0 a w s~ o ~, o a •.~ a •.+ •.+ ro a o z a~ --~+ E .~ o .~ +~ °vvi' n ti z~ ° wro i z ro c ~ w~W ~.JW E U\W W•.1 w w qw v-.~~www~ U+~~d1•i 4laEw•.+t~A a~ a ar to w c a ~ ~ x a ar a~ .a w ro + o ~ x ~ . . •. . .~ w z A w U °° a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a a a ~ a s A A A U A Q l~ 00 V' M d' ~O O O N M M U1 O O O O O O ~-i r-1 d' P ri .1 N N r•1 .-1 N ~•i r-I E W d~ O M z M H ~4 ~ U m m O R E E •a ro ~ ~ 0 b N t + m m m a- +~ a n a i c 3 v ro ro 0 o ~ a ~ c •a •a a~ ~ a o ro rom ~ 0 0 E E m \ ~ ~ m 0 m ao 0 o a i w w m m m 00 ••1 W W m U 1.1 3d 01 O! O! H M m G. C iQ', •d U U U U U H a a M 1~ Ol i.1 +~ +~ G1 O ~+ ~+ N a ~ c a ro ~ •o •o m v v > ~i a~ a~ w a~ ~ q ~ a~ m ~n ro E H E E m >, .~ >. ro ro a x H ~ a~ a- w w ro ~ ,~-~ .-~ o s+ a~ b+ tr -a s+ ro m m ~ ro ro .~ a ro ~ ro ro r+ .-+ a~ ~, x ae ro •.+ •.+ ++ A 11 R Oro •.I C A Sd Sd E U U a ~ a~ ro ro ro a~ ~ a~ •a ro ro a o 0 0 ~ A U ~ ~a~ ~ as ax cn w >+ ~ s~ -- ~ ~ s~ o >. ~. ~, ~, mo o ° ~ m ro m ., ~, ro ro m m a ro ro m m ~ ~ ~ ~ E E ~ O ~ ~ O _ N R \ > >r 1~ U O >, >~ U C >r\ >r >. ro \ U >+ ~a+~va>~~+ +-a~ ++E +~ +•mE•-+~ ~ s+ v a ro k E s+ ro o ro E o ro a~ ro~ ro--+NA ro N NlCWmwwwm,~ ma~o mX mom~x m >w a--xaaro axU aws+ amo•aw+~a o -- m y w a a~ a m w a~ -- o a~ •,., w -- a ar C7 ~ o E mv~ E'O Ev~ m ~ E ~ E~ ~ E H + C O•^~ O >+}+ m O L+ O C L1 ~+ 0 0 C ~+ O N 0 O m 0 z o~+~U~ w aU o U ro o+U~•a U aU m,~•aU H •a ro ro\ro m o\o \•a o\ro•o \a\w ro m\ ~ ma~+~a•a•a~U ~+ws~+~os~ ~v~,~UOm~ >T3 aE\s+ ro E ar E ~+ E't7 o E~ E >•o E ass+oa~~+as+w+~ a~~a a~~,U ~s~ws+s~wm .~o Xwaa~xm x•ao xo XoxwoEx a~os+w ~awro wa-.+woo+ w3wmoow ~ HU~v oy3 rov~ ~ v Ux-- -- ~- s~ .o ~ ~ +~ ~ E o e +• .a ro o s, ro U U o d~ •.~ ro O f•i w ro O s.~ N ro s.~ O O N N H U U acn3 m aaa aE+ ~ m o W O T3 M M U1 00 O .-i M e~ M O M 00 H O O O O .i N M 01 .i N M N N 00 C9 U .1 N N N d' d' tD t~ l~ ~ O~ O~ 0~ O r•1 fl r-, r., ~ N t0 .-1 e w of z ~o ~~ N al O '~ ~ C O t» at w •-1 +~ at 'o e a t» a ro o at U ~ .C ~1 U C i~ C ~ ••~ al c n w e.a O a! 0 o atroNo N >a rt ~ 'O m c M +~ ~ ro a i m a E I z E m ~ w a c C >. ~ m ro O ~ C C C b ro O A ~ v ~ c ~ t iA z A U H wwawa s~ ~ ~ >~ ro w o a ~ ~ -.+ ~ W m a o a a v o w >, m O ~- ~U U N O ~" ~ ~ U 11 1 1 l I I1~ - w a! o o a ro -. om ~ E 0 sr a i aaaw m m v '~ •- ia, a oo i~o SEroE+~ laa~~ H za ~' v~H~ .- i a ~ z a w e ~ ~, ~.a a i a a ~ E ~ E ~ w•roroo a i a i ax akrl ~~ atU atwwwro aU~ a ~- a ---.+ >a ro o .~ O C cv at w w t J ~ •-+ a, w ro q Iv w at N H W O U U W C. W G 4 w w U rt N N c'~ 00 N ~~~~ ~ ~~ e w ° w z w m a 0 M •rl ro U m -.1 e a at o ~ m C ~r O O y •a U C U O o at •-+ •a a v m ~m ro o roe a O $ ~•-~ ~ •.1 la m ~ W ro t» U ..~ .•t a ro •.+ .-~ ~ M ,7 .•~ r-i •.1 ~r ~ ~ a at ro ro -.~ C ?~ C •a W h h U H a z E E W ?~•a >. w w w H ~ C at at +~ ro s~ a1 w w w A A i3+•.t C A .~ W N W ~ a! o ro a +~ v •.+ o ~ .~ ~ z a U zwoc~ a am w w ~~~ o a, ~» -- m m ~ m J-1 1~ ?~ LI e U I» ro ro ~ o at +~ -.+ -- +~ ro x ° m a~~ t yma iw~m ia rl a eat a! .omcs+oos+ •,., ~ UBE w ~ -- zo.-aroo a i -- +~ ?~~O O ~ 1 a~U ro m U U o+ ro t•1 ~1 U U to >+ N e I U C I I rt w e e+~+~++ o+• U c t»•v as a a~ N ><EEAroW+~Cq~OC C M >v +i W N al •a m 1r a a1 al U at al --t s+ ww s~ ata w o om+~ o a oos~~---oa xa,w-~aat at a m w o e >, w •.•t ..I .~ a --+ ^..., r. z ca w U ro I I I k I a l a ~ o~ros~atm~sam>,,wcww ewe z U+~>.,v+~o+.,cla,atwo--w www a tT a, •a o a•.t U U •.+ •.+ •,., X •.I k O at Li •a t~ a~ at D w at -•+ al o at o k a tr w ro x ~- s~ w ,~ > .[ o .c o >•,w a Uwavow~+ mzwz w~ av ~v ro ~' Q V ~ + i a! ~ ~ ~ at U al r-I •,.t ~ m U ~ ~ ~ +~ s•, m> •.~ m ~ a a s N H A v~UAU ~ aA A a w a) 'C3 O~ ~0 00 ~"1 tl1 U1 N ~D n t` O N Q1 O N 'i 01 t[I ri r•i N G U .-I .-I d' d' t0 ~0 [~ W 00 00 r-1 w w •~ o a o ao z o+ z N n O N ~ ~ 04 /4 C m O E •-+ N 1~ ~ m ro C >r ~ O ~ .! •.~ U] •.a •.1 U ld U O +~ C A C C ', a G C N m E U yJ U d• O O m U N ro d• U q c •-~ -a ~ m .a o w a~ a- a~ a~ o m o ro ~+ b o a~ w N m ro .a ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ M w w ~ ro q ~., ~ is .~ ~ s+ w U U U v v N v q ~+ ro ~ U ,~ > m m m m m ~ ~ x +, 'O m w N 11 Ol C N O N N d Ol ~ O m C b~ C a s ~ +~ a +• w a a a a s a a +~ o +• -.+ w a ro a v ro U a m a a U •.+ v~ Ul ~ E +~ \ U 'O 'O 'O b ~ v • ~ ro m ro ~ N E Ol O! \ \ a ~ d, C 0 ~ ro ro ~ ~ , s + w ro ro ro , , ~ ~ ~ w o s+ ~ a o •,., o ~+ o o+ a s a ~ m m a ro u ~ roc r+ a~ a~ o- a~ a~ a ro ro ro ro ro •a a x x a o ro a o •.+ s~ ~, s~ s~ s~ a E a ~ a b+ ro s~ ~ ~ ca a a ww ow w w w w ~ a x ~ ww w a a a s, ~ -- o s~ co m v ro o ++ a m s~ a ~o ~, +.~ ar •.+ m v ar ~ ro ~. a s+ a ++~m ao ~, o x s~ roroa a~ ro a- ~ +a E •-+ c m m o a o ~ ° ~ w moa~ ° w ~ +, o+o-a c ~ a a C ~ ~ w m E.~ \N +~ w ... m -- i b-, i+ h v ~•a o U •-+ ?. W ~ a~ ~. ~. o ~. ~ in row ~ a~ w ~ ~. c ~ s~ ~, x ~o o s+ ro \ \ v s~ E r+ ~+ > s+ s+ ~, ~, ~o E ro s~ GL tr+ s+ s+ ro ~ ~ ro s.~ o~ s+o w+~+- a~ o v ro o a~ ow o Crow o ~o ~~~ o E ro o o.a m m~ ro a+~aaaa+~XU+-s,~,ro„c~a~+~ xoo~.~o~~ +.a-.+aoa M ro EEWrow•.+roam-.+ro-.aro-.aro ~ -aoroUroro ro a -.~ M W m W N N m~ C m m .~ m C m .C m M W a.1 f.l m\ ,'f', m f.l m W\ W y1 W oaoxx~a .cca-aUa•aaU~ oa~aa+~ a a~ ao~owo a ~~ ~ aowa" a ~ ~ s~ w u , a aa aaa ~ s+u~ca~~ao as+~s+c is+ OEO EE+~HEwEOEFEOE OmcEa~aE •-~ EOa~OmO ~ ++o~~~woro i o i o•.+o o•ao ~ +~•.+roo~roo m o,~x~+•.++, z vU u a a oU awUwU~U mU.aU x oa Uw aU m U ow oa v ~ w\w w ro.-+\•a u~\w~ro\o\ro\ H w\o\.-•a\•a \~r-ro\o ~ awame>a~ ~w ~a m ~ ' w `' i+ : ~a a~w aw•° as~ a ~ a~rn-. +aa A E A m O N E o U E U E ro E N E ro E o E m E a- v E o E A a a E a w a~oavo w waawawaaa~ a~a~wo+~w U a~ •-+ a~ +~X.~mn kUaxax x X x ~-~eaaerorox x+-a,~x+~ C W C m U U W O W O W GI W 'O W V1 W C W W C W CJ~ W C O C W C ro ~-- ro ~ rC •.~ -- ~•.~ ..,.a ... w .., c .., z ~- ro ~- m •- ro .•~ ~- a r- ro N a -- ro w m m w 0 •,., ro ro w \ a~ m a~ O ~ m m m h •-+ m m .C v .~ ro ro ~ -.a -a ao •.1 m >, -a ro ~ m m m N H a ~ Uw om ao w w w N F ~ ~ as m a ~ ~ ro w 'O 00 0~ O OD 00 ~'> r-1 O M 10 ~ TS O l0 h N O h u1 r-1 O '-1 .-I M r-1 N O d' ~O ~D ~O O N O M d' rl r-1 .i N C1 U r•I N N M d' ~0 00 00 00 0p (~ U ~-•1 N N N M c'r1 h h 1 N r•I ~~ t ~~ 1.1 a O U .,., a U .,) U sro+ O mx •o+ a~i a~ .a aU +• -- .,.,.i >. ~. a ~ i•1 U O ro~~ -- ~ •-+ ro >, O U m S.I •.1 C ro+~ww aw~a •.1 U ~ O ~mwU ~QO~ U \,.k (L m +~ ~+ E ~NUW Cr W 7v v W ... 7 fw~+ xs+aa W N A U NW •a N tT •rl N ~ fx U O O mrn ~ ~~ ~ E W d~ O ~ z ~r N N M -4 C 0 •.1 U N a m a H m ~ ~r b O! N C ~ ro-.1 U Sd ~ tll ~ ~ ~ ~w a ~ +~ •aw ~ w ro ro >. a b ~ ~ • iw v a a tro ~ N N O C O! •.1 '~.' A U W U' W >, m ~ N O U • b ~ m s~ ~ a~ a~ w a E r+ _ o ro -- U S.1 >r >r ~ ~ c ro ~ ~, + "~ ~ ° + ~~~omo 0 ro trf O O D i i w ~ O +~ ~+ ~ w o w •.+ w wv ~+om~ ~ EHOmL~m F•1 ?~ O H ~.l •.1 N •'1 U E ~ E A N E W •a W •a N ~xb++~x.cx C W C C W U W ro -- w ro -- N W .-1 m ~..1 .-1 -.1 •.1 -.~ a ;1 m '~ m (~ 0~ •-1 m •.~ m N N H ~ U~ A W N ~ p ~ N t7 U ~1 ~ ~ 0 . 0 r-1 ~ N r•1 .-i '-I E W oI z N ~I N H 14 a~ o+ a M 10 'Q H l~ C .-~ H ro .-~ •a a • c a o ~.+ ro ~ a i d Z E E w w x N ~ LI U! 01 w w ~ • • a m v b - + ~ ~ ~ A o a r+ a~ a~ a a ° i ~ a ~a v i ai ~ ~+ C ?~ ro o~ a •.~ ro o me --~ .,., o ~ > •.r w •.+ ~ _ _ ~v U ~r 1.1 ?~ 'Jr N b m m a m ro m - + M C A O O •a O ~ O O C ~ ~ 0 o. 1~ O ~ 0 - M EN ~ Em a iNamN m ms~Nw~+s~Ew~+w~+ f.~Ux WUL1G1 WUOU amwromoxrom~,m N U +1 ~- U •rl U W U •rl U •.~ M ... \ f.l\1J LI W\f.l\ w ~ a~ W W1~w ~w~•a~ ~ro E~b ~ A U w s +E • ~ E O 01 Ow N 0! ~ N G! W 0! xrowx.caxxEx ~W~OWtAU W W W S v v ~ ~ G1 U Ol U ~ }J ¢~ ~ m O+•rl a a a 1~ Sa T7 .-1 W CL O O •r1 -.1 a 0 G! N 1a er1 H A CO a A A C7 W OJ 'Q O~ u1 t+1 00 00 O ~ N ~ C7 U N ~ ~ o D o + f+1 ~-i S~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E W h O •~ z .i ~o H P4 m E N m W C O •.1 }7 ~ d ~ a N C 4l H ,'~ rl Q) ~ ~ ~ A E Z E E N --i w o ~ o ~ o w + - + a ro ro ro a s~ ~ o ~>.w w ~ ro a o ~, •a ~, ~' e a i ~+ o m .a U ~ A f .1 • 0 O 1~ G- • 1 ~ .~ W U ^ E -a UEO?~OA ?~ h vwro~,A~ 1.a N W ., b W O W E O •~ •,., w .a a ~ ro ~, w ~ w k +- ~o~oww m ~ oaom o~im z +~~oanw.co ~ ~' ~' a ao a is + a ~,a ~ oaA~A ~~ a+~x+-aax ~+~cwawmw ~w~ v ro °Av + i w m m a ~ ~ o m m -+ x r~ H U RC r.C U w w ¢s h w cn rn G9 U N N c~1 00 E W N O n Z .~ ~o N -4 m CI O -.a +~ U E ~ W O ~ m O U •.1 S.I m M •d ~- O m a~ > ro +~ h C U a,' ro ~ U a ~ Ul ~ W +~ 4 E C O ~ ~ row aoi o ~ ~ro w e O ~+ +~ ~+ Q r-1 •rl ro m U a ro c v .-~ •a a~ ~ s, x •.~ ~ a~ o aoi w ~ a~i +i-.° m o 0 '~ A U C7a w A ~ as a U ~ s~ w ~. ~ w a m '++' a C id mE Sd U LI -Od ~ ~ +~~Amla•.dwNw~i.1AL1i.1 ~ro>. ~ ~~,~~roo+rov~rooro~oroa~rows~ r~ O +~ q C q ~~ O w O C U R 3 0 >.~awowo~ouoaao•aoo+- a emalro+~w~va~s~~a~v~+o+~Em oak+~a~owEa~•-+a~xamaa~Eo owwms~ ~+as+AS+wros~ s+ow Ua--wns~ooo o-- owoUa E mom~,m~,m mmom E x CU W NA UA>A•-1A O ~+AwA RU -. ro~d+w~w~w~r+~~, ro~a~~ro~ mao a•.+a a~aa- a.~ama aw~oaEiAaEiow~aEi•~'aow~wmw m x X~ k ~~ kA x~ k m x ~w ~.s+w aw ~+w aw s+w owaw N O Ol U ~ U ~ ro U m p v +~ C O id m S.~ m A L1 m q N •.d Q) 1.1 •.1 m •.-1 m •.-i •.-I m N M H w aA ~ A ~ aA ~ ~ w m v ~ ono N ~ m rno rn rn O N O~ N .-1 M M O N sf• d' G U ~ .-1 N d' 'd' V~ h h n oD V~ r•1 .~'~ i .~ ~ ~ W .~ o ao z M n ~o w m C O .,~ yU W O~ m C C •.1 N O O 'O N N d~ ro U 'O m ~ ro c I n +~ a - [ z $ O C ~. ro - o ~ c c a ro a -.+ a~ M W .-1 ~ -.I z A a w w m a 0 .,., U .m m tr -.1 H O O 9r'd >+ ?~ °~ Nb~ro ro ~' aoo+o~o Ill ro•a C-•I U•.I a} +~ •rl +~ m ~! a U W U U gmgm'Om z ma o+A roo ~ a+ w+ v+ a wEwE E O%OXfs~ % s+ws+www o V~vOv + l ~ W N W +~ 1a S.I •rl 1'~f •.1 -.1 •.1 .C rf H A A U W N ~ p U ~ ~ C9 t ~1 ~ 0 0 ~~~~~~ W 0 0 ~ z O n M m m W C O .,~ ro m t~f m O G! m N U U q -. d U Sd H ,7 •,.I ~ o ~' w ~ a i ~ C m O (A GI H a w z E E w ~ >. O ~ b ~ a a + ~ b a ro e ~ e a o E ~ A x ~ W C9 Dv1 s~ ro ~. a o m --+ a ~ ~o ~ ~ ~ U '+ S.I W ~- m -~ m ~'' ~ ~ W U ~ Ill C1 1 1 U b I L 1 A f l a+ oroam ro•.Iro~ ro \ ~ ~ P Q) O -d +I ~ ~ d~ m 1~ C 1~ ~ W~ W U 1I OL LI E 8 O! 1.1 .-I ~ W N fa UOlUlUUroU~-r1U Am ~m m o bwro m r.l ~ ro-. ~ i - z ~A a--aA CA o mA ~ ~~ro -.~~a~~++ a~~ ~ x~+zm[~~Ic9++UUi~ ~ ~ w w w~w~~~~ 001O+IOWON--11.1W w ~ A ro s+ s~ V ,ww ~+w iw o -- o In o -- o -- ~. U ~ U! U U V - .1 ~ 1I LI 1d 1.1 S.1 •.~ U M H A A A A A W W N I 'O I"1 01 e~ M 01 d' CJ U .-1 N N 'd' d' O~ ~~ W ~ o ao z N eN M ~ ~ C q a~ w iL J~ ~o O +i ~ N N 7 ~ N G) yJ ~O ~ A b ~ ~ ma O 1.I O U O ro a o .a~ a ~ A W U ~~ ~, m c~ 00 ~ o ~ i ~ a i a E ~+ a--U.c O 9r m +J .~. ~° c ro ~ o > i o W O 1~ 3 J~ A m Ill 11 $ O g ~ O E w R~ .r U p m G --I -. d H U ~ U C ~ ~i W it -rl b 1J m 6 w ~ o o a~ a -+ o~ m w w s+ w o--o~-- U G! w w r-I N 0! m of H A UU W Gl N ~ U r ~J ~ 0 0 r-I J- ~ a E w o zo~ 0 n ~~ a M ~o +~ q DJ N ~~.1 w ro M ~ ~ A d~ o~ ~o N z N ~' a~ .a ~o ~ MI H W ~I ~I a E w o zoo o~ rl 10 ~O ~Ho +~ N Z C H jJ a ro M N ~ A 0~ N z N w .a ~i H W ~I ~I ~ ~ E w ~ o o~ z o. M 14 W U .,~ ~0 '~ a s~ m O O! G! t/1 U N •.1 tH~ 1~ +~ > z E E ai O ~+ ZT ~ a ~ e E .~' A }". .'I'. Sr S.I O O ~ ~ ~ --~ ~tl ~ b ~ ~ ~ro~b o m ma o i .. CO C" •.1 C -•1 ~, •,., +• ..a +, ~ U U ~ 'l. A~Q M C \ O \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ oaoa U ~ U ~ ~x+~x aw aw ~o -- m -- ~ +~ a~ m m ~ m m M E ~ ~ W CJ U N ~ e w ~ o o~ z N 0 a~ N 0~ ~ d~ ~ ~ C l.i ~ O n 1~ ~ z E ~ O S.~ ~ A ro ~ ~ A U td C O .,~ W U 0o a o ~ ~+ a ~o ~ 41 k W H ~ e O a~ +~ .~ a +~ a erf H U W ~~~ c E w ~ z°~ 00 er o~ M eN o~ r ~ O H ~.l a ro H Q) ~ A 0 ui 0 .o z H ~' a~ ~I H W ~I ~I ~O .-1 ~'~ A 8 W n z°) o~ a N M O a M ~ ~ C N H ~.1 ~ ~1 A ~ ~ A M N n ~o M M a~ .~ d~ H W N d U Q 8 W n z° 0 H OQ is t+1 r n ~ ~ H G z E M ~l O f.i a ro M A .~ ~D 0 n H z H ~' a~ a~ H W ~~ o) E W .~ ~ z°I o~ 0 H 0 ro SJ N ~.! If1 W o~ •a r+ •.~ a. +i E Z E ~ N ~.1 ~ a m a ~ A U ~0 ~ s} N rl ~ O ~ -a n +i O ~ N S.I -.1 x +~ a N Ip ~'. •.~ iJ as X01 ~w ~v °+ a ~ a ~ E U W U M ~oI N z 0 M H H N O a A W M H H y ~i n a~ a z L/~ z 0 F 0 a ~' ~ W O rl ~+ U ~ U ~ H 1~1 F ~ / W a ~, m o a ~ ~ a m ~a $ +~ O U U ~ ~ • ~ O ~ U ~ rox ~ U ~ W ~ .~ ~ NU EOM rtl ,~ •.1 N •~ W N w U9~m~,w3O m~wG a~ ~ ~ b •.~ m •a o x ~ s~ s~ ~, ro ~, s~ O ~ O ~ ~ H G D G OUC l1UU ~t OI N z 0 M H y O a a w N w M N a~ 0. H N N TS N .-1 O u'1 O O O U1 O to u1 U1 ch ~ tr1 u1 O U rnrno~~NOOaOm Z a a z~ ~~ 17i r..~ ~ ~ U M~1 W M~ W Z M~1 a w N a w A W 1 r-~ ~H~y Mil U ~ N .~ W ~ a a o ~ M z o A N ~ 01 ~ U ~ °' .,., .,., Q o~ U w w ° ~o .~ N ro ~ ~ ~ ~ N C •.d O ~ aroi ~ ~ A W 3 W +~ O $ 'O N O k •~I v ~ o a z ro N ~ {f1 M Q in w .~ ~ o b ~ ~ v ~ ro o a x ~ ro ~ -.~ a +~ .,., .,., ~+ ~ w a° ~ O ~ ~ rf •a O rr H ~ W ~a o o z C7 U) ~n U N .~ O S~ R~ .d C O A O LI N U d ,-~ -•~ X .,.~ W A a, ~ z° ~ a w N O M [ O •.1 ro M ~ w ~ 0 ~, o ro •-~ v ~ ~ U 01 0 a s ~~ H y.i 0 ~~i b 'd 0 .,., N j.l ~ ~ Ol .,., a o ~ ~ ro a ro •.+ ~' 0 N D1 q w ~ O W M O~ O N ~i W a ..~~ Cl U GXl w C w a z 01 ~ -- v a~ -+ s~ n1 O O a ro ~ m N H t.; ~ ~ 0 o +~ .a .,.~ U O ~ a N +~ ~-+ m ~ ~ aD •.i O .~ (-~ U .. W H v ~ z U ~ ~O rn 0~ d' O W ~ a~ M z° -'~ 0 d~ ~ M •.-1 C W ~ ro ~ °' 0 0 .O 0 .,., a o ro ., ~' .i o z E \ O o a ro ~, •.+ ~ a ai w '~ O! .d C 7 w O O >r •rl U m ~ a v o°` ~ d o~ o v -a s.~ N ~.1 ro N U O ~ m o -- o H U ~ •a ~". w W tl! •.I OC C ~ a~ a~ wa a vii z o ~~ U ~ ~ +i LL r+ H A W o o z U' U) 00 ~~ rn .~' i E w M O M z M M ~O 01 O~ rl O M N q 7 ti b+ q ~0 •.1 M '~ O~ ~ O! o~ N yl 1~ C ro d N M aEl m ~ O ~+ U N a ro -a a M ~ Q O ~ A a w 0 't7 0 .,.~ s~ R. o ro b o m w a m ~ M ~ O •-~ O ~..~ d~ ~ W N ~ LL w vro ~ .. ~ ~ m w ~ ~ C S~1 a c~ a~ m .~ ~ ~ ~ O •-a La N H U W fR1A ~ e+ °z G7 UI ~ ~r E b~ w a .,~ ~o O C ao z N ~ o ~r •a a o H 1~ ~ ro N N .C J-- ro f.l O U W CO •n •~ O ~ ~ a 0 a'N C C N }~J }~J •-1 O l~ -a O A ro ~ o 'r£ A C7 Ul .,r ro _ o ro ~ s~ o " ro ~ ~ ~ a s E s+ 0 0 ~ U w M yl '~ N E >rn ~"~ Ol O O~ w w `~ ro~ M H M ~ v ow ~ ~~ .b~ •N U w aA w .-+ .-a .,., ~O -.1 •.~ N F U W o o z C7 U) d' S w ~o O ao z N -4 (A O .,.~ U N w m a ~i H U GI CO 'O •n ~ Q O ~ ro s~ a 0 0~ e} 1.~ C 'O R •.1 C ~ ~ M J y ~ O 1~+ C 41 A ro ~ ~ .'E A W w 0 q o _ -.~ ~, ~ ~+ ro ° + ~ ~ ro v ~ a~ a , ~ 6 o s~ o~ U O ~ \ W M ~ ~ ~ M ~ w ° s a CL ro H x N ~ ~ ~ W O « .1 a ~ ~ O w a w .~ .-~ •.r t0 •rl •.I N H U W a v z ~ ) ao p G9 U s~ E w ~ O M z N C4 .~ N e~ U ~ •.1 ~o ~ d~ 1~ N O N ~J ro O la Sa a ro e 0 ~ A C 7 ~o rn rn 0 M w ti w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O b d n ~ M O Ol ~~ a ro x ~v :E O +~ O U ~ N k 011 ~w ° a .,., a~ ~ .~ •,., +~ U O~ •rl ro N E W •• W W ~ ~ ° µ ~ z p I C7 U st O N ~ -~ a z z ,~ o o~~ ~~~ ~ ~a O F~ U ~o o ril ~~~ m .,~ w .~ 3 m i." O .,.~ .,., m O a a~ ..., H w ro s~ mo ca m O E C .~ N Oi~H -a -,~ i~ m b -a O C ma ro 0 a ~u ~o a~ a~ ~~~ mw ~ -a --~ ~ wmw -~ m m ro +, m .~ ~ wob ~+ c ~, U ~ C7 H H H H H H ~~~ s~~~ ~~~ aaa o~ M r v H ~i 0 m s~ m .,., a .,.~ 0 U O! A .a N .,~ E 1.1 Ul N ,d m ro ~, ~, id O) .a ro U m .,~ w .., b ~, ~- a~ a~ A O m a 0 .,~ .,.~ m 0 a w a, w x H W H O z N AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 27, 1995 ORDINANCE 62795-3 TO INCREASE THE SALARIES OF THE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.07 OF THE ROANORE COUNTY CHARTER AND SECTION 14.1-46.0- 1:1 OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, Section 3.07 of the Charter of the County of Roanoke provides for the compensation of members of the Board of Supervisors and the procedure for increasing their salaries; and WHEREAS, Section 14.1-46.01:1 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, establishes the annual salaries of members of boards of supervisors within certain population brackets; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, has heretofore established the annual salaries of Board members to be $10,161 by Ordinance 61494-7 and further has established the additional annual compensation for the chairman for the Board to be $1,800 and for the vice-chairman of the Board to be $1,200; and WHEREAS, this section provides that the maximum annual salaries therein provided may be adjusted in any year by an inflation factor not to exceed five (5%) percent; and WHEREAS, the first reading on this ordinance was held on June 13, 1995; the second reading and public hearing was held on June 27, 1995. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the annual salaries of members of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, are hereby increased by an inflation factor of 5% pursuant to the provisions of Section 3.07 of the Roanoke County Charter and Section 14.1-46.01:1 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. The new annual salaries shall be $10,669 for members of the Board. In addition, the chairman of the Board will receive an additional annual sum of $1,800 and the vice-chairman of the Board will receive an additional sum of $1,200. This ordinance shall take effect on July 1, 1995. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the ordinance with 5 increase, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYE5: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy NAYS: Supervisors Nickens, Minnix A COPY TESTE: r Brenda J. ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney D. Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance ~, ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~'"' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 27, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE TO INCREASE THE SALARIES OF THE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.07 OF THE ROANORE COUNTY CHARTER AND SECTION 14.1-46.01:1 OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' In June of 1994 the Board adopted an ordinance to increase its salaries pursuant to the provisions of Section 14.1-46.01:1 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. This section of the State Code and Section 3.07 of the County Charter require that any increase in Supervisors' salaries be accomplished by ordinance after public hearing between May 1 and June 30. Any increase is limited to an annual five (5%) percent inflation factor. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The first reading of this proposed ordinance was held on June 13, 1995; the second reading and public hearing is scheduled for June 27, 1995. The current salary for Board members is $10,181. In addition, there is an additional annual compensation for the Chairman of the Board at $1,800 and for the Vice-Chairman at $1,200. At first reading, the Board of Supervisors voted to increase their salaries by 5%. ALTERNATIVES AND FISCAL IMPACTS: The Board has several alternatives: (1) Approve a 5% increase in Board salaries. This is the maximum allowed by the State. This option would cost $2,500. (2) Approve a 4.8% increase in Board salaries. The County staff is receiving a 4.8% average salary increase plus additional monies for corrections of inequities. This option would cost $2,440. ~-a Respectfully submitted, Dia a D. Hyatt Director of Finance Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson Kohinke Nickens Minnix Vote No Yes Abs ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 27, 1995 ORDINANCE TO INCREASE THE SALARIES OF THE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.07 OF THE ROANORE COUNTY CHARTER AND SECTION 14.1-46.01:1 OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, Section 3.07 of the Charter of the County of Roanoke provides for the compensation of members of the Board of Supervi- sors and the procedure for increasing their salaries; and WHEREAS, Section 14.1-46.01:1 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, establishes the annual salaries of members of boards of supervisors within certain population brackets; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, has heretofore established the annual salaries of Board members to be $10,161 by Ordinance 61494-7 and further has established the additional annual compensation for the chairman for the Board to be $1,800 and for the vice-chairman of the Board to be $1,200; and WHEREAS, this section provides that the maximum annual salaries therein provided may be adjusted in any year by an inflation factor not to exceed five (5%) percent; and WHEREAS, the first reading on this ordinance was held on June 13, 1995; the second reading and public hearing was held on June 27, 1995. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the annual salaries of members of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, are hereby increased by an inflation factor of 5% pursuant to the provisions of Section 3.07 of the Roanoke County Charter and ,- _,r„~ Section 14.1-46.01:1 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. The new annual salaries shall be $10,669 for members of the Board. In addition, the chairman of the Board will receive an additional annual sum of $1,800 and the vice-chairman of the Board will receive an additional sum of $1,200. This ordinance shall take effect on July 1, 1995. c:\wp5 ] \agenda\general\salaries.ord ~illlllllllililllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllil1111111111111111~ _ - - AGENDA ITEM NO. _ _ _ APPE CE REQUEST = _ - -_ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS _ _ __ _ _ SUBJECT: J ' Z S/ ~ /? r ;~' .._.~ ~,~ ,,~~.._~ _ _. _ __ _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. =_ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: __ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will _ decide the time i~mit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue. and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ofgthe Board to - __ do otherwise. _ _ _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ _ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. V c _ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP c SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. _ _ c PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK _ _ _ _ _ _ //`/'~~j NAME ~ ~ ~ , _ ~ i ~ ~ f` _ = ADDRESS 3 Y~ ~ ~.~ ~~r ~:~ ,~ ~~ -~ ~ ~ _ s ~. - - - _ _ _ _ _ - PxoNE 7 7 /- ~ ~ ~ _ - - llllllllllllllllllilllilllllllllillllllllllillllllllllllllllililllllllllillllllllillilllllllllllllllllilllilllllllllllllilillllim ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER ~~" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 27, 1995 SUBJECT: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1. Community Policy and Management Team The one year term of Rita J. Gliniecki, parent representative, will expire July 31, 1995. The C.P.M.T. has requested that Ms. Gliniecki be appointed to serve another one-year term, and that her appointment be confirmed at this meeting. Mr. Chambliss has submitted this request on the Consent Agenda. 2. FIFTH PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION The three year term of Edward G. Kohinke, Sr., Elected Representative, will expire June 30, 1995. At the May 9, 1995 meeting, Supervisor Kohinke advised that he did not wish to be reappointed. 3. HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION SAFETY COMMISSION The four year terms of Lt. Art LaPrade, Police; Jeffrey A. Echols, Transportation Representative; Ms. Jackie Talevi, Legal Representative; and H. Rodney Smith, Senior Citizen Representative, will expire June 30, 1995. Lt. LaPrade, Ms. Jackie Talevi, and H. Rodney Smith have served two consecutive terms and are not eligible for reap- pointment. At the May 23, 1995 meeting, Chief of Police Cease was asked to recommend a nominee to serve as the Police representative. Supervisor Nickens suggested that James Martin be appointed as Senior Citizen representative. Supervisor Eddy suggested that appropriate organizations could be contacted and other K~-s recommendations requested. 4. LIBRARY BOARD Mrs. Shirley Van Riper representing the Catawba District has resigned from the Library Board effective immediately. Mrs. Van Riper was appointed to serve the unexpired term of Mrs. Dorothy Shifflett and this term will expire on December 31, 1995. 5. VIRGINIA WESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE BOARD The four year term of Jean Glontz will expire June 30, 1995. Ms. Glontz has served two consecutive terms and is not eligible for reappointment. At the May 23, 1995 meeting, Supervisor Nickens advised that Dr. Downs, President of VWCC, has been asked to recommend a nominee. SUBMITTED BY: ~~/~,~ Brenda J. Holton Deputy Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) Kohinke To ( ) _ Minnix Nickens e~ ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 27, 1995 RESOLUTION 62795-4 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM L - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for June 27, 1995, designated as Item L - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 6, inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of Minutes for May 17, 1995. 2. Resolutions requesting acceptance of following recreational and industrial access roads into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary State System: a. .88 miles - Green Hill Park Road (Route #1185) b. .26 miles - Goode Park Road (Route #961) c. .20 miles - Clearbrook Park Road (Route #908) d. .20 miles - Garst Mill Park Road (Route #1373) e. .14 miles - Walrond Park Road (Route 823) f. .40 miles - Valley Tech Road (Route #830) 3. Designation of Voting Delegate to National Association of Counties Annual Conference, July 21 - 25, 1995. 4. Confirmation of appointment of parent representative to the Community Policy and Management Team. 5. Request for official acceptance and appropriation of $150,000 Community Improvement Grant for Valley TechPark to the Capital Projects Fund. 6. Approval of Investment Policy Amendments. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and r directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the Consent Agenda, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: wv..-v~v~- . Vr~i Brenda J. Hol on, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance l L_r May 17~ 1995 ~ ~ ~ __ Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 May 17, 1995 The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being an adjourned meeting from May 9, 1995, for the purpose of a budget work session and capital improvement program work session. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Minnix called the meeting to order at 2:00 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix, Vice Chairman Edward G. Kohinke, Sr., Supervisors Lee B. Eddy, Bob L. Johnson, Harry C. Nickens MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney; Mary H. Allen, Clerk; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator; Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator; Anne Marie Green, Director, Community Relations IN RE: REQIIESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS Several Board members indicated that they had to leave advised that staff was looking at restructure of the base charge for water. Supervisor Minnix asked that staff plan another trip to the Spring Hollow Reservoir and Treatment Plant. 2. Economic Development Projects (Tim Gubala, Economic Development Director) Mr. Gubala presented information concerning four projects with total costs of $2,214,450. They included the Hollins Joint Industrial Park, the Parkway Interpretation Center, Phase II, Va1leyTech Park and I-81 Corridor Development Site. He also updated the Board on the turn lane at Hanover Direct. Supervisor Johnson left the work session at 4:00 p.m. Chairman Minnix left the work session at 4:10 p.m. 3. Roanoke County/Salem Jail Expansion (Sheriff Gerald Holt) Sheriff Holt reported that the expansion of the jail consists of renovation of the 6th floor and the addition of a 7th floor for a total addition of 80 beds. The project is supported by the Salem City Sheriff. The total project cost is $2,272,000 of which $1,344,500 is the County's share. Sheriff Holt recommended that the Board not seek regional jail status because of the possibility that the County would have to go out for Requests for Proposals (RFP's) for the jail operation and could loose control of the jail. It was the consensus of the Board that Sheriff Holt It was the consensus of the Board to leave the 1995/96 funds appropriated for cleanup in the budget. 6. 800 MHz Radio Svstem (Fire and Rescue Chief Tommy Fum1a and Police Chief John Cease) Chief Cease advised that the current system was designed and installed in 1986/87. Traffic has increased substantially since then and the County has added many radios. Chief Fuqua explained that the recent increase in the E911 tax was to fund more dispatchers and replace the CAP system, but the 800 MHz system was not included in the $1.06 tax increase. The total estimated cost is $2,086,000. It was the consensus of the Board to go forward with the expansion, and staff was directed to bring back a report on the Consent Agenda authorizing the expansion and working with the consultant at no cost to the county. Mr. Hodge will bring back proposed methods of funding including E911 tax increase. 7. Voting Machines (Elizabeth Leah, Registrar) Ms. Leah reported that the current voting equipment is over 35 years old. The new machines would reduce the total number of machines from 87 to 35, require less storage space and weigh less than 60 pounds each. The total project cost is $250,000 and Ms. Leah recommended setting aside the funds each year until there is adequate money to purchase all the voting 3. Delete funding for Virginia Western Community College Science Center ($7,250) and no funding for VWCC facility and parking improvements ($66,379). 4. Delete funding for two deputy sheriffs for jail expansion. 5. Add $10,800 for funding of Fifth Planning District Commission Greenways Study. 6. Add $50,000 .for Parks and Recreation Capital Community Incentive Matching Funds. IN RE: ADJOURNMENT At 6:35 p.m., Supervisor Nickens moved to adjourn. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote with Supervisor Johnson absent. Submitted by, Approved by, Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix Chairman 4 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~ ° ~ Q AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 27, 1995 AGENDA ITEM• Acceptance of the following Industrial Access and Recreational Access roads into the Virginia Department Secondary State System: Park Access Roads a) .88 miles - Green Hill Park b) .26 miles - Goode Park c) .20 miles - Clearbrook Park d) .20 miles - Garst Mill Park e) .14 miles - Walrond Park Industrial Access Road a) .40 miles - Valley Tech COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: „~,~-ti ~;h .~~~~ ~ ~r~c-c SUMMARY OF INFORMATION VDOT informed Roanoke County on May 26, 1995 that the appropriate resolutions requesting VDOT acceptance of the above referenced roads have not been filed by the County Board of Supervisors. Even though maintenance is being provided to the park roads, VDOT is requesting the adoption of the attached resolutions in order to meet their legal requirements for providing maintenance. FISCAL IMPACTS No County funding is required. l r ~,~ A--F STAFF RECOMMENDATION The staff recommends that the Board approve the attached resolutions to VDOT requesting that they accept the above described roads. S MITTED BY: APPROVED BY: Y nold Covey, Dir ctor Elmer C. Hodge of Engineering & nspections County Administrator --------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred Kohinke To _ Minnix Nickens cc: Pete Haislip, Parks & Recreation AT A REGULA COUNTY, VIRGINIA, ON TUESDAY, 27TH R MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER DAY OF JUNE 1995, ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING: RESOLUTION 62795-4.a REQUESTING THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO ADD LINK A-B, A DISTANCE OF 0.88 MILES, GREEN HILL PARR ROAD, ROUTE #1185, TO THE SECONDARY SYSTEM OF BTATE HIGHWAYS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 33.1-229, CODE OF VIRGINIA. WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has constructed Green Hill Park Road under Project 1185-080-239,C501, and WHEREAS, the project sketch, attached and incorporated herein as a part of this resolution, defines adjustments required in the secondary system of state highways as a result of that construction, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add Link A-B, a distance of 0.88 miles, Green Hill Park Road, Route #1185 to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code of Virginia, for which sections this Board hereby guarantees the right of way to be clear and unrestricted, including any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board orders that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote Moved By: Supervisor Kohinke Seconded By: None Required Yeas: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix Nays: None A Copy Teste• Brenda J. Ho ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Virginia Department of Transportation ~ ~ i L- ~, ~ courlTY RoANOKE UATE Of IIESOLUTION: SUUU I V I S I ON ,RFFN HI L PARK ROAD -RTE. 1185 ~b0 760 Rd~oKE RtVER~ . 88.,x,• ..r-- • 04m~ 039 ~ I B5 639 .o A 3 •,/ 8 639 ~ X38 Proposed additions slioNn iu red. (1) Link A-B (2) (3) Lenptli: (1) 0.88 mi (2). (3) R/N : 00' Condition: Good RoadHay Nidt1~ : 46' & Vari abl e Surface Hidtho: 24' & Variable Service: Recreational Access ° Improvemenfie to be tAado: None Estimated Coefi to put into maintainable eonditiont 0 Resident EnQineer~e Roc:a:mnendafiiou: Pccept Ua to ~ -.~~ ~, AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, 27TH DAY OF JUNE 1995, ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING: RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO ADD LINK A-B, A DISTANCE OF 0.88 MILES, GREEN HILL PARR ROAD, ROUTE #1185, TO THE SECONDARY SYSTEM OF STATE HIGHWAYS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 33.1-229, CODE OF VIRGINIA. WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has constructed Green Hill Park Road under Project 1185-080-239,C501, and WHEREAS, the project sketch, attached and incorporated herein as a part of this resolution, defines adjustments required in the secondary system of state highways as a result of that construction, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add Link A-B, a distance of 0.88 miles, Green Hill Park Road, Route #1185 to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code of Virginia, for which sections this Board hereby guarantees the right of way to be clear and unrestricted, including any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board orders that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Moved By: Seconded Yeas: Nays: Vote A Copy Teste: By: Mary Allen, Board Clerk L- ~ ,b AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, 27TH DAY OF JUNE 1995, ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING: RESOLUTION 62795-4.b REQUESTING THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO ADD LINK A-B, A DISTANCE OF 0.26 MILES, GOODE PARR ROAD, ROUTE #961, TO THE SECONDARY SYSTEM OF STATE HIGHWAYS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 33.1-229, CODE OF VIRGINIA. WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has constructed Goode Park Road under Project 0961-080-208,N501, and WHEREAS, the project sketch, attached and incorporated herein as a part of this resolution, defines adjustments required in the secondary system of state highways as a result of that construction, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add Link A-B, a distance of 0.26 miles, Goode Park Road, Route #961, to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code of Virginia, for which sections this Board hereby guarantees the right of way to be clear and unrestricted, including any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board orders that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote Moved By: Supervisor Kohinke Seconded By: None Required Yeas: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix Nays: None A Copy Teste: Brenda J. H ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Virginia Department of Transportation COUNTY ROAN01~ UAT>; OF RESOLUTION: SUUU I V I S I ON (~nnnF PARK R~An - RTF 9h1 N ~ ~ Tow:J ~ c ' ~ L~ miTS O i . p~ ~ ~ ~.oS A6r,n- v~+v7bnl j Zy ~ . ~ . 07 rn, A ~ 654 Proposod additions el~oxn in red. ~ 1 ~ Link A-B (2) (3) L~.?~ a Length: (1) 0.26 mi (~) (3) R/H: ~0~ Condition: Good Roadxay Hidtl:: ~' Surface Nidtl~s : ~ Service: Recreational Access Improvements to be Mada s None Estimated Coat to put into maintainable conditions 0 Resident Engineers Iloco:a~nendafiions Accept Ua I:e r ~-a. b AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, 27TH DAY OF JUNE 1995, ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING: RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO ADD LINR A-B, A DISTANCE OF 0.26 MILES, GOODE PARR ROAD, ROUTE #961, TO THE SECONDARY SYSTEM OF STATE HIGHWAYS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 33.1-229, CODE OF VIRGINIA. WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has constructed Goode Park Road under Project 0961-080-208,N501, and WHEREAS, the project sketch, attached and incorporated herein as a part of this resolution, defines adjustments required in the secondary system of state highways as a result of that construction, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add Link A-B, a distance of 0.26 miles, Goode Park Road, Route #961, to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code of Virginia, for which sections this Board hereby guarantees the right of way to be clear and unrestricted, including any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board orders that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Moved By: Seconded Yeas: Nays: Vote A Copy Teste: By: Mary Allen, Board Clerk COUNTY ROAN01~ llnrE of R~SOLUTIoN: SUUU I V I S I ON GOODE PARK ROAD - RT 9h1 N ~ ~ Tow N ~ ' 1 ~ o/ ~I mi75 O . ~~ ~ ~ f oS ~~r,,, ViN`fbl~ , ~ - , Z~ -,- ~ . ~ .07~+, A ~ 654 Proposed additions slinHn iu red. I~-~ Link A-B (2) (3) Length: (1) 0.26 mi (2). R/W: 50~ Condition: Good RoadNay Nidtli: ~' Surface Hidfil~s: 22' Services Recreational Access Improvements to be Mado; None Estimated Cost to puff into maintainable condifiions 0 (3) L-~,6 ltosident En~ineer'e Ilocrnmnendafiiou: Accept Date r ~ ~:..~ ~ , ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, 27TH DAY OF JUNE 1995, ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING: RESOLUTION 62795-4.C REQUESTING THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO ADD LINK A-B, A DISTANCE OF 0.20 MILES, CLEARBROOR PARR ROAD, ROUTE #908., TO THE SECONDARY SYSTEM OF STATE HIGHWAYS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 33.1-229, CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has constructed Clearbrook Park Road under Project 0908-080-210,N501, and WHEREAS, the project sketch, attached and incorporated herein as a part of this resolution, defines adjustments required in the secondary system of state highways as a result of that construction, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add Link A-B, a distance of 0.20 miles, Clearbrook Park Road, Route #908, to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code of Virginia, for which sections this Board hereby guarantees the right of way to be clear and unrestricted, including any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board orders that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote Moved By: Supervisor Kohinke Seconded By: None Required Yeas: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix Nays: None A Copy Teste: Brenda J. Ho ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Virginia Department of Transportation r ..~ Lam, ~ COUNTY RCWVOKE unT>; oe ncsor,urlort: SUUU I V I S I ON CLEARBROOK PARK ROAD - RT. 908 N B .~ 908 ~ , ~It~,~ uo ~f A ~~5 v bsa Propos3uJ additions ehoHn iu red. (1) Link A-B. (2) (3) Length: (1) 0,20 mi CZ) (3) tt/H : 60 Condition: C-~od RoadHay Nidtl~s ~~ Surface Hidtl~s : 22' Services Recreational Access Improvements to be Mado: Norse Edtimated.Cost to put into maintainable coudifiions 0 Itesident Engiueer~s Ttv~asmnendafiious sPet bate L-a, ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, 27TH DAY OF JUNE 1995, ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING: RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO ADD LINK A-B, A DISTANCE OF 0.20 MILES, CLEARBROOR PARR ROAD, ROUTE #908., TO THE SECONDARY SYSTEM OF STATE HIGHWAYS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 33.1-229, CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has constructed Clearbrook Park Road under Project 0908-080-210,N501, and WHEREAS, the project sketch, attached and incorporated herein as a part of this resolution, defines adjustments required in the secondary system of state highways as a result of that construction, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add Link A-B, a distance of 0.20 miles, Clearbrook Park Road, Route #908, to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code of Virginia, for which sections this Board hereby guarantees the right of way to be clear and unrestricted, including any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board orders that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Moved By: Seconded Yeas: Nays: Vote A Copy Teste: By: Mary Allen, Board Clerk ~ ~ 1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, 27TH DAY OF JUNE 1995, ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING: RESOLUTION 62795-4.d REQUESTING THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO ADD LINK A-B, A DISTANCE OF 0.20 MILES, GARST MILL PARR ROAD, ROUTE #1373, TO THE SECONDARY SYSTEM OF STATE HIGHWAYS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 33.1-229, CODE OF VIRGINIA. WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has constructed Garst Mill Park Road under Project 1373-080-211,N501, and WHEREAS, the project sketch, attached and incorporated herein as a part of this resolution, defines adjustments required in the secondary system of state highways as a result of that construction, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add Link A-B, a distance of 0.20 miles, Garst Mill Park Road, Route #1373, to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code of Virginia, for which sections this Board hereby guarantees the right of way to be clear and unrestricted, including any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board orders that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote Moved By: Supervisor Kohinke Seconded By: None Required Yeas: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix Nays: None A Copy Teste: Brenda J. Hol on, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Virginia Department of Transportation L-a , ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, 27TH DAY OF JUNE 1995, ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING: RESOLUTION 62795-4.e REQUESTING THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO ADD LINR A-B, A DISTANCE OF 0.14 MILES, WALROND PARR ROAD, ROUTE #823, TO THE SECONDARY SYSTEM OF STATE HIGHWAYS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 33.1-229, CODE OF VIRGINIA. WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has constructed Walrond Park Road under Project 0823-080-209-N501, and WHEREAS, the project sketch, attached and incorporated herein as a part of this resolution, defines adjustments required in the secondary system of state highways as a result of that construction, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add Link A-B, a distance of 0.14 miles, Walrond Park Road, Route #823, to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code of Virginia, for which sections this Board hereby guarantees the right of way to be clear and unrestricted, including any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board orders that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote Moved By: Supervisor Kohinke Seconded By: None Required Yeas: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix Nays: None A Copy Teste: Brenda J. lton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Virginia Department of Transportation ~-a. ~ COUNTY ROANOKE UATE OF RESOLUTION: SUIlU I V I S I ON WALROND PARK ROAD -RTE. 823 N :,~~,oaM~ ins 19ab Proposed additions 81ioHn iu red. ~1~ Link A-B (2) (3) Length: (1) 0.14 mi (~) (9) R/H: 50' Condition: C-~od RvadHay Hidtl~: 44~ Surface Hidttis : 22' Services Recreational Access Improvemenfis to be ~Aado: None Eotimated Coet tv put infio maintainable conditions o Resident Engineers ttacasmnendatiou: Pccpnt date: L- a, AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, 27TH DAY OF JUNE 1995, ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING: RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO ADD LINK A-B, A DISTANCE OF 0.14 MILES, WALROND PARR ROAD, ROUTE #823, TO THE SECONDARY SYSTEM OF STATE HIGHWAYS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 33.1-229, CODE OF VIRGINIA. WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has constructed Walrond Park Road under Project 0823-080-209-N501, and WHEREAS, the project sketch, attached and incorporated herein as a part of this resolution, defines adjustments required in the secondary system of state highways as a result of that construction, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add Link A-B, a distance of 0.14 miles, Walrond Park Road, Route #823, to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code of Virginia, for which sections this Board hereby guarantees the right of way to be clear and unrestricted, including any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board orders that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote Moved By: Seconded By: Yeas: Nays: A Copy Teste: Mary Allen, Board Clerk COUNTY ROANOKE UATE OE' RESOLUTION: SUUU 1 V I S 1 ON WALROND PARK ROAD -RTE . 823 N ,oam~ (Ii5 t 9a6 Propoeod Additions elioHn iu red. (1) Link A-B (2) (3) ~-~ ~ Lenpth: (1) 0.14 mi (~) (3) n/w : 50' Condition: Good RoadHay Hidtli : 44' Surface Hidtl~a: 22' ServicQ: Recreational Access Improvemenfig to be ~dado s None Estimated Coed tv put into mainfi~it~able evt~ditions o Residenfi EnRineer~e Raeoimnendatiout Acr.~nt Ua to ~'~, AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, 27TH DAY OF JUNE 1995, ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING: RESOLUTION 62795-4 .f REQUESTING THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO ADD LINR A-B, A DISTANCE OF 0.40 MILES, VALLEY TECH ROAD, ROUTE #830, TO THE SECONDARY SYSTEM OF STATE HIGHWAYS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 33.1-229 OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA. WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has constructed Valley Tech Industrial Road under Projects 0830-080- 294,M501, and 0011-080-R07, M501, and WHEREAS, the project sketch, attached and incorporated herein as a part of this resolution, defines adjustments required in the secondary system of state highways as a result of that construction, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add Link A-B, a distance of 0.40 miles, Valley Tech Road, Route #830, to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code of Virginia, for which sections this Board hereby guarantees the right of way to be clear and unrestricted, including any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board orders that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote Moved By: Supervisor Kohinke Seconded By: None Required Yeas: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddv, Nickens, Minnix Nays: None A Copy Teste: Cv Brenda J. Ho on, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Virginia Department of Transportation t L.- VC f 1 COUNTY ROANOKE DATE OE' RESOLUTION: SUUII I V I S I ON~A~EY TECH -RTE 830 N . o'f ~^` O ~~ .~a M. _~ E /O Q Y B Propor;ad addifiione ehotrn in red. (1) Link A-B (2) (3) Lenpfih: (1) 0.40 mi (~) (9) R/H : 60' Condition: Good RoadHay Hidtlr : 3~ Surface Nidtlra: 36' with e.~rb & gutter Services Industrial Access Irnprovemenfie to be nSada: ~bne Eotimated Coet to puff into maintainable condifiions o Iteeident En~iueerre Rocormnendafiiont Accept Date: 4- L-~, .~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, 27TH DAY OF JUNE 1995, ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING: RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO ADD LINK A-B, A DISTANCE OF 0.40 MILES, VALLEY TECH ROAD, ROUTE #830, TO THE SECONDARY SYSTEM OF STATE HIGHWAYS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 33.1-229 OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA. WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has constructed Valley Tech Industrial Road under Projects 0830-080- 294,M501, and 0011-080-R07, M501, and WHEREAS, the project sketch, attached and incorporated herein as a part of this resolution, defines adjustments required in the secondary system of state highways as a result of that construction, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add Link A-B, a distance of 0.40 miles, Valley Tech Road, Route #830, to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code of Virginia, for which sections this Board hereby guarantees the right of way to be clear and unrestricted, including any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board orders that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote Moved By: Seconded By: Yeas: Nays: A Copy Teste: Mary Allen, Board Clerk Lam' o~,'T COUNTY ROANOKE UnTE oe RESOLUTION: SUNUIVISION V I Y TE H -RTE 830 N . o'i ^`~ O ~~ ~a M• -E o A 8 I'roposad additions sLotrn iu red. (1) Link A-B (2) (3) Length: (1) 0.~0 mi (2). (g) R/H : 60' Condit ion : Good RvadNay Hidtlr : 30 Surface Hidtlra: 36' with curb & gutter Service: Industrial Access Irnprovemenfia to be mado : None Estimated Coat to put into maintainable conditions 0 Resident EnRineer~e Rvcomrnendafiion: Accept Da Le a ~ A-62795-4.g ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~ ""~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 27, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Designation of Voting Delegate to the National Association of Counties Conference, July 21- 25, 1995 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The National Association of Counties 60th Annual Conference will be held July 21 - 25, 1995, at the Georgia World Congress Center in Fulton County, (Atlanta) Georgia. Treasurer Alfred C. Anderson has advised that he plans to attend this conference and is willing to serve as the voting delegate for Roanoke County at the business meeting. It is recommended that the Board designate Mr. Anderson to serve in this voting capacity, and return the voting credentials form to NACo. Elmer C. Hod e County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: Motion by Edward G. Kohinke to approve VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy x Johnson x Kohinke x Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer Credentials Committee, NACo 061 1Ji 95 MOl_V ].3:05 Ft~~°. 202 303 2630 ~:~co ~ c~o2 National Ass9ciaticrn of Counties L- ~' MEMORANDliM ELECTION OF OFFICERS: ELECTION OF OFFICERS: ELECTION OF OFFICERS! To: County Executives, County Board Chairs, Parish Presidents, and Borough Mayors From: Randall Franke, NACo President Date: May 24,1995 Re: Voting Credentials - 1995 Annual Conference It`s that time again! ~'e arc in the midst of preparing for lv'ACa's 60th Annual Conference to be held 3uly 21 -July 25, 1995 in Fulton County, (Atlanta) Georgia, V~'e need your help to insure that your county will be able to participate in the Association's annual election of officers and policy adoption far this year's American County Platform. Please tell us on the enclosed farm the Warne of the voting delegate and alternate(s) authorized to pickup your county's credentials material. Note that the NACo bylaws permit only dues-paying member counties to vote and that a registration fee for the canference must be paid. Also, state assoeiation exeeutide directors or presidents vtvill be entitled to pick ug unclaimed credentials as of M®nday, July 24. If you do not want the state association to be allowed to do so, please note such on the form, PLE,~SE RETtIA:N THF.. ENCLO~Erf F®RM''r4 NAC(D BY FRtn,~Y, ~U1VE 23. SE(vi) TO: Credentials Committee c/o Membership Coordinator 44Q 1st Stree#, N.W. V6'ashington, DC 20001 Thank you in advance for your prompt attention to this matter. We look forward to seeing you at the Annual Conference. Enclosure 440 firs: Street, Nl^v Washington, DC 20001-2080 1011343-6226 far202/33s'-2630 r,~ ;a u 6 r i ~ ~ ~f i //~ 0 National Association of Couaries Counties Care forAmerica 440 FiirSt Street N.W. • Wethtragtorr, D.C. 20001 • 202J 293-2630 CREDEh"TIALS IDEI~"TIFICATION FORM County Name: County of Roanoke State: Virginia Alfred C. Anderson Treasurer Designated Dclagate: Name Tide Alternate(s) by Name and Tide: None We do not t rate ~}ss~Ciatian Repr entative to pick up our Credentials Material. (ci~eck box) Sign ~' ~`"""~ Title c'hairman,,~, Roanoke County Board of • e Supervisors Date June 2 7 , 19 9 5 A-62795-4.h ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER -• AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 27, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Appointment of the Parent Representative to the Community Policy and Management Team COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' The Comprehensive Services Act for At Risk Youth and their Families became effective July 1, 1993 and requires each community to have a Community Policy and Management Team (C.P.M.T.) comprised of the heads of certain agencies specified in the legislation and two parent representatives. The parent representatives must have children who have been impacted by one of the programs covered under the act which includes those of special education, foster care, youth and family services, etc. Rita Gliniecki, one of the current parent representatives, has served well in this capacity for the past year and her term expires July 31, 1995. She has been a positive influence to this team and has expressed a desire to be re-appointed for another one year term. The Board of Supervisors is asked to confirm this appointment at your June 27, 1995 meeting. RECOMMENDATION' The C.P.M.T. respectfully requests that the Board re-appoint Ms. Gliniecki to continue service on the C.P.M.T. for another one year term effective August 1, 1995. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, -~ ~f Li .~ ~~u~-~'y.. ,CJ• (~, ! ~w .emu John M. Chambli s, Jr. Elmer C. dg Assistant Administrator County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: Motion by Edward G. Kohinke to ant~rove VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy x Johnson x Kohinke x Minnix x Nickens x cc: File John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant Administrator Community Policy and Management Team File ~r~ A-62795-4.i ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER L- '" S AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 27, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Acceptance and Appropriation of the Community Improvement Grant #94-455 to the Capital Projects Fund. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Department of Housing and Community Development of the Commonwealth of Virginia has awarded the County of Roanoke a $150,000 Community Improvement Grant for the construction and pavement of a 3,192 S.Y.access road to include 1,695 L.F. of curb and gutter for Valley Tech Park. The Board recognized Congressman Boucher's efforts in securing the grant during the September 27, 1994 Board meeting. Official notification from the Department of Housing and Community Development was dated Apri120, 1995. This action is to officially receive and appropriate the $150,000 to the Capital Projects Fund for Valley Tech Park. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance and appropriation of the Community Improvement Grant #94-455 to the Capital Projects Fund. Respectfully sub fitted, Approved by, _~-'-- ~~~~ Cam„-~~ ' ~ ~~~-~~~ ~~ Paul E. Grice Elmer C. Hodge Assistant Director of Finance County Administrator m:\finance\common\board\ June 21, 1995 L-5 ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Motion by Edward G. No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Kohinke to approve Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred ( ) Kohinke x To ( ) Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance • m:\finance\common\board\ June 21, 1995 v 4 A-62795-4.j ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER Lr~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY. VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 27, 1995 AGENDA ITEM• Investment policy amendments COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND• The County has had an investment policy since 1987. At the time the original one was adapted, it was announced that it was a living document and would need to be revised from time to time. It was revised in 1992 and again in 1994. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: On page 4 we are adding our "Orange County" paragraph. We are currently avoiding these instruments as they violate state law. This language is useful in avoiding pitfalls such as derivatives. On page 5 we are want to make it clear that safety comes first, as we do elsewhere in the document. On page 5 we are correcting a typo error by removing the word ~~ • ,~ in . On page 11 we are bringing the percentage in line with the State Code. On page 11 we are making it clear this refers to institutions as broker/dealers and not to institutions as issuers. The provision. is recognized on page l8 of the document. On page 20, "prime quality" commercial paper is defined as A2/P2 or better. The Code allows A2/P2 paper, but only if prior approval is obtained from your 'entity that determines investment po]_icy", and a credit report is prepared in advance justifying the creditworthiness of the issuer. We believe it is prudent to use only Al/Pl paper. j ,. ~ y~ FISCAL IMPACT: Further protects County Funds. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this be approved. Respectfully submitted, ~, %~~' / Alfred C. And rson, County Treasurer Appro3~,,v/~en~d by , ~ Elmer C . H dg , County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Motion by Edward G. No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Kohinke to approve Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred ( ) Kohinke x To ( ) Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Mary H. Hicks, Policy Manual L - (v 1 COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA I. Investment and Portfolio Policy A. Identification: 1. Purpose and Scope This policy shall establish guidelines for the efficient management of County funds and shall apply to activities with regard to the investment of the financial assets of the County. The goal of the policy is to allow the County to obtain the highest possible yield on available County financial assets, consistent with constraints imposed by its safety objectives, cash flow considerations and Virginia state laws that restrict the placement of public funds. 2. General Guidelines The Treasurer of the County of Roanoke is an Elected Constitutional Officer whose responsibility in part is receiving, collecting, safeguarding and disbursing county funds from all sources. It shall be the responsibility of the Treasurer, however he may designate a deputy to manage the day-to-day operations of the investment portfolio and place the actual purchase/sell orders with brokers. The Treasurer shall advise the County Finance Board, which is the Board of Supervisors, when the investment policy is altered and at the end of each month report to them the amount of money on deposit with each depository. Specifically excluded from these guidelines are L-~ 2 funds that by statue or ordinance require specific investments. 3. Authorized Investments As a unit of local government in the State of Virginia, the County of Roanoke is restricted by Virginia Security for Public Deposits Act, Sec. 2.1-359 through 2.1-370 and the Code of Virginia, Title 2 Investment of Public Funds to the following types of securities as described in Sec. 2. 1-327 through 2.1- 329: a. Bonds, notes and other evidence of indebtedness of the State of Virginia. b. Bonds, notes and other direct obligations of the United States and securities unconditionally guaranteed as to the payment of principal and interest by the United States or any agency thereof. c. Bonds, notes and other evidence of indebtedness of any county, city, town, district, authority or other public body of the State of Virginia. d. Bonds and other obligations issued, guaranteed or assumed by the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development and the Asian Development Bank. e. Certificates of deposit in commercial banks up to their net worth provided they are approved by the State Treasury Board in the State's Collateral protection pool in accordance with the Virginia Public Deposits Act. f. Certificates of deposit in commercial banks, savings and L~ 3 loan associations and mutual savings bank doing business in this State up to FDIC and FSLIC insurance coverage. g. Bankers' Acceptances h. Repurchase Agreements provided the securities for the agreement are written against specific government securities as authorized under Sec. 2.1-328. As a matter of policy, the county must take delivery of the securities purchased through a repurchase agreement if the term of the agreement is greater than four (4) days. If the term is less than four (4) days, the securities may be held in safekeeping by the bank for the account of the county. Pledged securities under repurchase agreements must be based on market value, not face value. When entering a repurchase agreement where delivery is not required, the county shall obtain a safekeeping receipt for specific securities. Refer to Part II Repurchase Agreements for complete details. i. Money Market Funds Deposit-type securities shall be collateralized through the State Collateral Pool as required by Virginia Public Deposits Acts for any amount exceeding FDIC or FSLIC coverage. Other investments shall be collateralized by the actual security held in safekeeping by the primary agent. All investments will be in the name of the County of Roanoke and will name the specific fund from which the instrument was purchased. Safekeeping account receipts will be held by the Treasurer's Office. L ~` C.~ 4 The Treasurer will continually monitor the contents of the portfolio, the available markets and the relative values of competing instruments, and will adjust the portfolio accordingly. CMOs, inverse floating rate securities, floatingt rate securities tied to a non-money market instrument, IO~s, POs, Z- tranche securities, residuals, and other securities having unusual features are expressly prohibited. Transactions in options, futures, options on futures, margin buying and commodities are prohibited. Any other security not specifically authorized in this document is expressly prohibited. 4. Maturities Maturity scheduling shall be timed according to anticipated need. Investment maturities for operating funds shall be scheduled to coincide with projected cash flow needs, taking into account large routine expenditures as well as considering sizable blocks of anticipated revenue. Investment of capital project funds shall be timed to meet contractors payments. Short Term versus Long Term Portfolio - Limitation on instruments, diversification and maturity scheduling shall depend upon whether the funds being invested are considered short term or long term funds. All funds shall be considered short term except those reserved for capital projects and prepayments funds being held for debt retirement. 5. Risk/Liquidity/Bidding ~'~ 5 The primary goal of the investment policy is to maximize return on investment while minimizing risk to the investment. The Treasurer will diversify use of investment instruments to avoid incurring unreasonable risks inherent in overinvesting in specific instruments, individual financial institutions or maturities. The Treasurer's office shall maintain a listing of financial institutions which are approved by the State Treasury Board for investment purposes and which shall provide their most recent Consolidated Report of Condition. Periodically, these financial institutions must be examined and evaluated to determine their strength and creditworthiness. During the bid process the Treasurer may reject an investment with a higher yield when he feels it carries an element of risk. Speculative investments will not be allowed. Before the Treasurer invests -ter any surplus funds, a competitive "bid" process with three or more financial institutions shall be conducted. If a specific maturity date is required, either for cash flow purposes or for conformance to maturity guidelines, bids will be requested for instruments which meet the maturity requirement. If no specific maturity is required, a market trend (yield curve) analysis will be conducted to determine which maturities would be most advantageous. 6. Reporting and Controls The Treasurer shall report at the end of each month to the Board of Supervisors the amount of money on deposit with each f ' ~~~ . 6 depository. The Treasurer shall establish a system of internal controls which shall be documented and reviewed with internal and independent auditors and meets the requirements of the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). The controls are designed to prevent losses of public funds due to fraud, error, misrepresentation, unanticipated market change or imprudent actions. B. Source of Investment Policy: 1. Current Management Practices The Treasurer shall develop and maintain written administrative procedures for the operation of the investment program. Each investment transaction shall seek to first ensure that capital losses are avoided, whether they be from securities defaults or erosion of market value. The County seeks to attain market rates of return on its investments, consistent with constraints imposed by its safety objectives, cash flow consideration and Virginia state laws that restrict the placement of public funds. An aggressive cash management program that maintains true zero balances in the County's checking accounts with temporary idle funds being invested overnight in repurchase agreements that are secured or collateralized by governmental securities as required by the Code of Virginia is also carried out by the Treasurer. Whenever possible funds held for future capital L - to projects (i.e., bond proceeds) shall be invested to produce enough income to offset increases in construction costs due to inflation. Diversification is required through the use of portfolio percentages. Safekeeping will be required using third-party safekeeping in an account in an institution designated as a primary agent. The Board of Supervisors will be given copies of the County's Investment Policies and Practices. All changes will be documented and copies sent to the Board. The Board should contact the Treasurer if they have any questions, recommendations, additions or deletions to the policies. The Treasurer will consider the recommendations and implement such recommendations which he deems in the best interest of the County. 2. Prudence Standards The standard of prudence to be applied by the Treasurer shall be the "prudent investor" rule, which states, "Investments shall be made with judgment and care, under circumstances then prevailing, which persons of prudence, discretion and intelligence exercised in the management of their own affairs, not for speculation, but for investment, considering the probable safety of their capital as well as the probable income to be derived." The prudent investor rule shall be applied in the context of managing the overall portfolio. The Treasurer, acting in accordance with written procedures L - !~ 8 of the Code of Virginia, Sec. 2.1-329.1 and Sec. 58.1-3123 et. seq. and exercising due diligence, shall not be held personally responsible for a specific security's credit risk or market price changes provided that these deviations are reported immediately by the Treasurer and that reasonable and prudent action is taken to control adverse developments. Furthermore, in accordance with Sec. 58.1-3163 of the Code of Virginia, the Treasurer shall not be liable for loss of public money due to the default, failure or insolvency of a depository. 3. State Law The County shall limit investments to those allowed under the Virginia Security for Public Deposits Act, Sec. 2.1-359 through 2.1-370 and Investment of Public Funds as in Sec. 2.1-327 through 2.1-329, Code of Virginia. The Virginia Security for Public Deposits Act provides for a mutuality of responsibility involving a cross guarantee among all commercial banks holding public deposits. In the event of insolvency by a bank holding public deposits, any losses resulting from uncollateralized and uninsured public deposits will be paid by assessments against all other commercial banks holding public funds. The amount assessed against each bank will be based on the ratio that its average public deposits bears to the statewide average. In respect to the savings and loan associations and savings banks, however, there is no sharing of liability for total public L.- - 9 funds on deposit. Instead, the savings and loan associations are required to pledge collateral equal to 100% of their public deposits, compared to 50% that is required of the banks. 4. Audit Requirements The Treasurer shall establish a system of internal controls which shall be documented in writing. Accurate and adequate records will be maintained by the Treasurer's Office. Such records will be subject to audit by the Internal Audit Department, as well as the independent auditors and the State Auditor of Public Accounts. Reporting and disclosure requirements will comply with all applicable regulations including the requirements of the Governmental Accounting Standards Board. 5. Concentration bank The Treasurer will move funds from other depository banks to a central point to maximize the availability of funds. The central point or primary bank will be the concentration bank which shall be determined by competitive bids. 6. Charges for Banking Services The cost of maintaining the account may be paid either by a compensating balance or by direct charges. If a compensating balance is used the Treasurer shall review with a bank official monthly an anlyzation of the County's account profitability to the bank. Considering interest rates at that time and the bank's average earnings allowance, the bank will determine the balances L_- !o 10 in the accounts (compensating balances) which will be required for the following month in order to cover the cost of processing the County's banking transactions. Copies of the result of these analyses will be maintained by the Treasurer. 7. Zero Balance Account (ZBA~ The Treasurer will take full advantage of clearing time on County checks disbursed by maintaining true zero balances in the County's checking account. As checks are presented for payment, they are accumulated and a single offsetting credit is prepared to bring the account to a zero balance at the end of the banking day. This account is linked to the Master Concentration or deposit account against which the ZBA draws funds to pay the checks presented for payment. Temporarily idle funds will be invested overnight in repurchase agreements that are secured or collateralized by governmental securities as required by the Code of Virginia. The Treasurer will determine excess idle funds and invest them in longer term investments. 8. Diversification Diversification by Instrument: Percent of Portfolio U.S. Treasury Obligations (bills, notes and bonds) U.S. Government Agency Securities and Instrumentalities of Government 70% 70% CD 11 Sponsored Corporations Bankers's Acceptance (BA's) 40% Repurchase Agreement (Repo's) Two or more nights 25% Repurchase Agreement (Repo's) overnight 70% Commercial Banks Certificate of Deposit (CD's) 100% Savings & Loan Associations Certificate of Deposits (CD's) 10% Commercial Paper 35% Local Government Investment Pool 75% Diversification by Financial Institution: Bankers' Acceptance (BA's) No more than 25% of the total portfolio with any one institution Repurchase Agreements (Repo's) No more than 20% of the total portfolio with any one institution Certificates of Deposits (CD's) Commercial Banks No more than 45% of the total portfolio with any one institution Certificates of Deposits (CD's) Savings and Loan Association. No more than $100,000 with any one institution. Local Government Investment Pool - State Pool No more than $15 million Commercial Paper No more than 25% of the total portfolio may be purchased through any one financial institution. Diversification of Funds to be invested in any one issue: NO limit- FDIC, FSLIC, Collateralized Certificates of Deposit L-~ 12 No limit- U.S. Treasuries and Agencies Maximum- 10% of total portfolio for any Bankers Acceptance and Commercial Paper issue II. Repurchase Agreements Definition A. Investing in Repurchase Agreements 1. The Instrument The repurchase agreements (Repo's) are an integral part of an investment program of state and local government. Their flexibility is unmatched by other short term money market instruments. They provide the investor an excellent cash management tool. The sale by a bank of a government security with a simultaneous agreement to repurchase the security at a later date can insure safety of public funds while securing money market rates of interest. The Repo is a contractual transaction between an investor and an issuing financial institution. The investor exchanges cash for temporary ownership or control of collateral securities, with an agreement between the parties that on a future date, the financial institution will repurchase the securities. The Treasurer will use a Master Repurchase Agreement (See Appendices) as a written contract to establish the County's rights in all transactions. A written contract will also be used with the independent third-party custodian. (See Appendices.) Customarily, the investor receives interest during the term - to 13 of the repurchase agreement, as agreed upon at the time of the investment transaction. The eligibility of repos depends on the manner in which the repo is structured. The Attorney General in an opinion written in July 1982 states "that a repurchase agreement which is secured or collateralized by governmental securities which qualify under Sec.2.1-328 is a legally authorized investment." The General Assembly during the 1985 session amended Sec. 2.1-328.'5 and added Sec. 2.1-328.8. This legislation authorizes the investment of public funds in overnight, term and open repurchase agreements which are collateralized with securities that are approved for direct investment. 2. Types of Repurchase Agreements An overnight repo is one which is written for one day, as its name implies. These are popular with cash managers seeking to invest funds overnight to meet specific cash needs on the next day or to combine assets with other investments and incoming cash in larger denominations for a longer maturity in another instrument. Interest rates tend to be quoted in relationship to the Fed funds rate, which is the interbank lending rate for bank reserves. Term repos are written for a specific time period of more than one day. The County uses term repos usually for maturities for less than 14 days, particularly when bank regulations require jumbo CDs to be written for at least 14 days with some having 30- day requirements. Collateral is adjusted daily to protect the L - Co 14 investor. Open repos are written without a specific maturity. Either party may end the transaction on a future date and the amount invested can be changed on a daily basis. Open repos are based upon a rate that keys off Fed funds or T-bill yields. 3. Know With Whom You Are Investing The Treasurer must exercise special caution selecting parties to conduct repurchase transactions with and be able to identify the parties acting as principals to the transactions. A written master repurchase agreement is executed between the County, the bank and the third party collateral agent. It is the policy of the County to concentrate its investment efforts to banks located in the State of Virginia which are under the Virginia statutes for public funds and all banks must be approved depositories by the State Treasury Board. 4. Collateral Collateral is the repo's underlying security. Repos are written against specific government securities as authorized by law. The best collateral from the investor's standpoint is short-term U.S. Treasury bills which are liquid and not subject to serve price changes. 5. Delivery of Collateral As a matter of policy, the County must take delivery of the securities purchased through the agreement if the term of the agreement is more than four (4) days. These investment securities may be held by the County or placed in a third party custodial L - ~-, 15 account for safekeeping. If the term is less than four (4) days, such as the overnight repo when third party safekeeping is not required, the securities may be held in safekeeping by the bank, but must be held for the account of the County. The repo must be written against specific government securities as authorized under Sec. 2.1-328. When entering a repurchase agreement where delivery is not required, the County shall obtain a safekeeping receipt for the specific securities purchased. Pledged securities under the repurchase agreement must be based on market value, not face value. 6. Risk Risk is significantly reduced by delivery of underlying securities through physical delivery to a third party custodian. Repos shall not exceed 25% of the total investment in the County's investment portfolio on any one day and no more than 15% with any one institution. Losses can be limited in doing repos, if not avoided entirely, by following these four basic rules: (1) operate under the terms of a clearly specified and executed master repurchase agreement with Commercial Virginia Banks, (2) properly assess counterparties including their corporate structure and capital strength, (3) use appropriate procedures for obtaining control of securities, and (4) evaluate securities appropriately and monitor them regularly, making margin calls when necessary. III. Prime Bankers' Acceptances Definition• • . L -~ ~ 16 This instrument as defined by the Government Finance Officers Association, Committee on Cash Management in its June 1984 publication Model Investment Legislation is as follows: "Bankers' acceptances typically are created from a letter of credit in a foreign trade transaction. For example, a U.S. corporation planning to import goods from abroad requests that its bank issue a letter of credit on its behalf in favor of the foreign supplier.This letter allows the foreign vendor to draw a draft on the importer's U.S. bank for payment of the merchandise. Upon receipt of this letter and draft, the supplier ships the goods and presents the draft at its bank for discounting, allowing the supplier to receive immediate payment for the shipment. The foreign bank then forwards the draft to its U.S. correspondent. At this point, the draft is stamped "accepted", with the U.S. bank incurring an obligation to pay the draft (now a bankers' acceptance) at maturity. The accepting domestic bank may buy the acceptance, earning the discount between the purchase price and face amount to be reimbursed by the U.S. importer. On the other hand, the acceptance may be sold to a third party, freeing the bank of all but the contingent liability, for which it collects a small fee. In this case the acceptance--- secured by the bank, the goods themselves and the importer---becomes a money market instrument. In 69 years of use in the United States, the bankers' acceptance has experienced no known principal loss to investors. There have been instances of counterfeit and fraudulent • '~` .' (v 17 acceptances. Government investors are advised to seek bankers' acceptance from money center banks to insure a secondary marketability unless a lesser known local institution offers a yield premium. Maturities range from 30 to 180 days." As a matter of policy, one of the banks should be a Virginia bank and the County should only purchase bankers' acceptances of banks that have a rating of no lower than B/C as assigned by Keefe Bruyette or the top local banks. The maximum percentage of funds to be invested in any one issue shall not exceed five (5) percent of the total portfolio. These securities will be held by the County's third party custodial agent in the County's name. IV. Prime Quality Commercial Paper Definition Commercial paper has a history that extends back to colonial times, prior to the existence of a banking system in America. The precursor of commercial paper was the domestic bill of exchange, which was used to finance trade as early as the beginning of the eighteenth century. Bills of exchange allowed the safe and convenient transfer of funds and provided a short- term loan between the time of purchase and payment for goods. As financial intermediation evolved, banks and paper brokers began discounting paper. The supply of negotiable paper was held by commercial banks or by entrepreneurs investing surplus funds. Commercial paper is a short term unsecured promissory note that is generally sold by large corporations. In recent years 18 commercial paper has attracted much attention because of its rapid growth and its use as an alternative to short-term bank loans. The principal issuers of commercial paper include finance companies, nonfinancial companies and bank holding companies. These issuers participate in the market for different reasons and in different ways. Finance companies raise funds on a more-or-less continuous basis in the commercial paper sales in part to support their consumer and business lending. These commercial paper sales in part provide interim financing between issues of long-term debentures. Non-financial companies issue commercial paper at less frequent intervals than do finance companies. These firms issue paper to meet their funding requirements for short-term or seasonal expenditures such as inventories, payrolls and tax liabilities. Bank holding companies use the commercial paper market to finance primarily banking related activities such as leasing, mortgage banking, and consumer finance. The firms issuing paper obtain rating from at least one of three services, and most obtain two ratings. In most cases, insurers bank their paper one hundred percent with lines of credit from commercial banks. Present day investors in commercial paper include money center banks, non-financial firms, investment firms, state and local governments, private pension funds, foundations and individuals. The County's policy is to invest only in "prime quality" commercial paper, with a maturity of two hundred seventy days or -- ~ . - 19 less, or issuing corporations organized under the laws of the United States, or any state thereof including paper issued by banks and bank holding companies. "Prime quality" shall be as rated by the Moody's Investors Service, Inc. within its ratings of prime 1 or prime 2 or by Standard and Poor's, Inc. within its ratings of A-1 or A-2 or by Fitch Investors Service within its ratings of F-1 and F-2. The maximum percentage of funds to be invested in any one issue shall not exceed five (5) percent of the total portfolio. These securities will be held by the County's third party custodial agent in the County' s name . It shall be the county ~ s policy to purchase only Al - P1 paper., Local Government Investment Pool Act Operated Directly By State Treasurer A. The Act and its Purpose 1. Introduction The "Investment of Public Funds and Local Government Investment Pool Act" became effective January 1, 1981 and provides for a local government investment pool which will produce additional revenues for localities on short-term investments. The pooling of funds enables governmental entities to avail themselves of the economics of large-scale investing as well as active, professional management of funds by the State Treasurer's investment staff. As a member of the pool, governmental entities are able to L-~ 20 take advantage of the investment facilities of the Commonwealth. Pooled funds are invested in accordance with Treasury Board investment guidelines for the Commonwealth's general fund monies. This encompasses third-party delivery of repo collateral and other professional safekeeping arrangements. 2. Investment Strategies Investments will be made in conformity with Sec. 2.1-234-4 of the Act. There is a minimum participation of $5,000.00. The minimum period for investment is one day. Rates of return vary. Once the account is established, no minimum balance is required. Additional investments can be made in minimum $1,000 increments. The pool provides liquidity to the investor with one-day notice of deposit or withdrawal of funds. Instructions are to be called to the Department of Treasury at (804) 225-3166 before 4:00 p.m. on the business day prior to the actual transfer of funds. 3. Income Earninas Accumulated income will be credited to each participant's account monthly. Each locality will receive a monthly report which will contain the following information: Average investment balance Average yield Gross investment credit Administrative expenses Net Investment Credit Changes in participation made during the preceding month 4. Reserve for losses + r v a , a L- ~ 21 It is not anticipated that a reserve for losses will be necessary due to restriction on the quality of investments. Amended: January 28, 1992, Amended again December 1, 1992 general.invest.pol v`/ County of Roanoke, Virginia General Fund Unappropriated Balance Amount % of General Fund Expenditures Beginning Balance at July 1, 1994 (Audited) $7,123,594 8.3% November 22, 1994 Community Visioning Process (40,000) November 22, 1994 Traffic control at Hanover Direct (10,000) January 10, 1995 Public Safety Building improvements (92,000) February 28, 1995 Citizen Survey (12,600) April 11, 1995 Dixie Caverns Cleanup (2,250,000) April 11, 1995 Tour DuPont (5,000) April 25, 1995 Citizen Bulk/Brush Self-Haul Program (98,608) May 23, 1995 Virginia Amateur Sports donation (5,000) June 13, 1995 Urban Partnership ($10,000) Balance at June 27, 1995 $4,600,386 5.4% Submitted By Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance Note: On December 18, 1990, the Board of Supervisors adopted a goal statement to maintain the General Fund Unappropriated Balance at 6.25% of General Fund revenues ($85,310,775). i• m:finance\common\boazd\genera1.95 June 21, 1995 v '~ County of Roanoke, Virginia Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance Beginning Balance at July 1, 1994 (Audited) $ 29,835.86 Sale of Ogden Property (net of marketing costs) 395,450.81 Sale of Fire Truck to Eagle Rock Volunteer Fire Department 3,500.00 Balance at June 27, 1995 $ 428,786.67 Submitted by Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance The Board has pending closure at this time Sale of School Administration Building ($600,000 over three years). • m:\finance\common\board\capita1.95 June 21, 1995 C.~ -~ 'i County of Roanoke, Virginia Reserve for Board Contingency Original 1994-1995 Budget $90,000 June 28, 1994 Dixie Caverns Landfill (50,000) August 23, 1994 Additional funds for Bushdale Road (10,000) September 13, 1994 Contribution to Friends of the Blue Ridge Parkway (1,000) October 11, 1994 Williamson Road design master plan (20,000) January 10, 1995 Regionalization Study (3,000) February 28, 1995 County Code Supplement (4,227) Balance as of June 27, 1995 $1,773 Submitted by A .. ~~ ,~~, ~. Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance 1 m:\finance\common\boazd\continge.95 ACTION # • i• i• ITEM NUMBER ~' "°" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 27, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Accounts Paid -May 1995 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Payments to Vendors: $4,495,051.02 Payroll: 5/5/95 $563,253.20 5/19/95 557,731.64 1,120,984.84 $5,616,035.86 A detailed listing of the payments is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. SUBMITTED BY: ~. Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance APPROVED: Elmer C . Hodge County Administrator ACTION Approved () Motion by: Denied () Eddy Received () Johnson Referred () Kohinke To (~ Minnix Nickens VOTE No Yes Abs r ACTION N0. ITEM NUMBER ~ - ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CEN'T'ER MEETING DATE: June 27, 1995 AGENDA ITEMS: Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investments and Portfolio Policy, as of May 31, 1995. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S CONA~IE<V'I'S SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: BANKERS ACCEPTANCE: CENTRAL FIDELITY 2,685,332.77 CRAIGIE 992,976.67 FERGI'JSON-ANDREWS 988,469.44 NATIONS 995,411.11 PAINE-WEBBER 993,280.56 SIGNET 1,194,130.00 SMITH-BARNEY-SHEARSON 995,560.00 WHEAT 1ST 2,194,163.55 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSITS: SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA SAVINGS & LOAN 100,000.00 COMMERICAL PAPER: CENTRAL FIDELITY 993,905.28 CRAIGIE 994,150.00 CRESTAR 1,987,530.28 FERGUSON-ANDREWS 995,303.61 NATIONS 2,987,824.44 PAINS-WEBBER 1,989,116.67 SCOTT & STINGFELLOW 994,619.17 SIGNET 995,247.22 WHEAT 1ST 986,657.50 FIDERAL CREDIT: SMITH-BARNEY-SHEARSON 995,473.33 LOCAL GOVT INVESTMENT POOL: GENERAL FUND 4,524,416.13 RESOURCE AUTHORITY 1,473,146.07 REPURCHASE P,GREEMENT: C.ENTRAI, FIDELITY (RES.AUTH.) 700,000.00 CENTRAL FIDELITY 1,009,245.72 FIRST VIRGINIA 7,885,000.00 NATIONS (RES. AUTH.) 1,000,000.00 SIGNET 2,506,543.78 INVESTMENT: COMMONWEALTH (RES. AUTH.) 5,000,000.00 TOTAL 11,039,324.10 100,000.00 12,924,354.17 995,473.33 5,997,562.20 13,100,789.50 5,000,000.00 --------------- 49,157,503.30 Page 2 of 2 ITEM NUMBER D - S AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION (.,ENTER MEETING DATE: June 27, 1995. AGENDA ITEMS: Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investments and Portfolio Policy, as of May 31, 1995. STAFF REC.ONIl~TDATIO Respect lly Submi ed by Al red C. Anderson L unty Treasurer ACTION Approved ( > Motion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION N0. Approved by: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy __ _ _ Johnson _ _ _ Kohnike _ _ Minnix ~ _ _ Nickens r ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 27, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Bond Project Status Report COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Attached is narrative overview of the bond projects approved in the 1992 Bond Referendum (Attachment A) , a time line for the projected/actual activity of the various work components (Attachment B) and a listing of projects that have been completed (Attachment C). FISCAL IMPACT: None. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Questions may be directed to either the specific project coordinator listed on the time line worksheet or John Chambliss. Respectfully submitted, Appr v d by, ~ ~ ~~~ hn M. Chambliss, Jr ~ Elmer C. Hodge Assistant County Administrator County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) Kohinke To ( ) Minnix Nickens C/ "` ~o BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment A June 27, 1995 1992 BOND REFERENDUM PROJECTS PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS DRAINAGE PROJECTS -MASON CREEK Plans have been made to remove silt/cobbles from areas upstream of the Phase I project. However, these plans are delayed until access can be obtained. This project has also been indefinitely delayed until access can be obtained. PARKS AND RECREATION Garst Mill Park -Complete. Whispering Pines Park -The project is complete. Goode Park -Complete. Vinyard Park I -Complete. Tennis Court Renovations -The contractor has been given notice to proceed on the renovation of the Bent Mountain Court. A O O M O ~ O M ~ O O ~ ~ p O d' ~._..~~0 ~ ~~ b0~1p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ +-~ ai C7z~Q o ~ ~ ~ o o ~ ~ O 'C1 U ~ W 0 a W F d F ~ ~ a ~~ A ~ N o~~ P~ ~ ti H W 0 U a a ICI ~I Az d d~' U A a A ., z ., ¢ ~, a W w z ti U W A 0 z 0 o~ a w w C7 A A w w z a ¢ w z a ¢ w z a ¢ w z a ¢ w z a ¢ w• z a ¢ Q z a ¢ z ¢ F z ¢ F z ¢ F z ¢ ~ Q ~ Q F Q F aa. U ¢ , j a U ¢ j a U ¢ , j w U ¢ ,..~ a U ¢ a a U ¢ a a U ¢ ~ o o az ~ ~" ~H~ a ~~ H Ha ~~ w a Wz~ ~~' ¢z z a a,~ oo H X 0 0 aUA A A ¢tC ~ O ¢U O U A O rnU a s aU O F o- ~ .~ A '~ c~ bA l,' .~ ... a 0 U ~° .~ c~ 0 .~ b b cd w 0 0 .~ c~ .~ 0 an w 0 a~ U O •~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ z O O O ~0~~ ~ ~ ~ Q z~s o~ ~ ~ ~. o ~ o ~ a~i U ~ ~-+ W U N O a W N A H U ~~~ ~~~ N .--i a~ N ~ ~ A CQ d ti x w U z 0 H U O a a A .~ ti z ., ~ ~ °~ a d a d W w ., W A o z ~- U O a W d W C7 A w z F d Q F d z F Q a a a z 0 F x F ~" ~ N w •• H z d ~ U O F O U N O ~ 'd N ~ ,~ O a~ O U ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~, cd N O 'C ~n j ~~ o ~~ .._, ... ... ~~ ~~ >~ ~~ ~, O U ~ O •~ a ~~ aH ~~ N ~ ~~ ~ O .~ N C1~ .~ ~.. Q O U ~ ~ •., ~ ~.+ ~ U U U O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.+ ~ O ~ ~ ~ N 'l7 ,S~ ~ ~ ~ cd . a~ z~ 3 N ©- ~ O O O O O O ~ p O N ~ 6F3 bg ~~+ ,~ N ~ «S ~ ~ bA Q ~ ~ ~ O z ~a ~~ 00 ~ Cam". U ~f..,+ U O ~ ~ O W U U O a W A F U ~~~ ~~ z~~ ~ ~ ti a ., z ., '^ d °~ a d ~ ~ d x ~ W w U Q O ~' U i W C/~ Ca F ~ o O z a ~, ~, ~ o ~ °~ w A ~ ~ d w A A z a d w z a d Q z a d w z a d w z a d w z a d Q H Q F Q F Q F Q F Q F oa, U d ,~ w U d ,~ a U d ,.,~ a U d ,,,~ a U d ,.a a U d H o z 0 ~ ~ z U U H w ~N `°z" ~~ z H U a 0~ ~ O O O ~ ~ b ~~.+ cd ... .~ ... _o .~ U .~ c~ H Q a~ a~ O U G~ L-~ c~ a z 0 U M ~~ ~~~ ~; ~ O Q ~+ ~ O ~' ~ O 64 ~ ~ U p ~ ~ ~~tin~ ~Zp~q ~ o ~ W ~ o ~ ~ 0 0 U U O a W F"~ A E-~ U ~ ~ a\ a ~~ A ~ N ~ ~ ci Q ti a ti z a ~" ........ ........ °~ a a ~ w w z { w Q 0 z F a W c~ W O Q W w a w a Q a Q a w a Q a w a w a z ¢ z ¢ z ¢ z ¢ z ¢ z ¢ z ¢ z ¢ ~ F H F H H F F Q E -~ Q ¢ Q ~ Q ¢ ¢ a a U ¢ a a U ¢ a a. U ¢ a a U ¢ a a U ¢ a a U ¢ a a U ¢ a a U ¢ w F z w ~ 0 Q w z O ~ H z ~ ~> ~ q W ~ ~ Q a U W ~ ~ N ~ F ti ~ w~ U w wF" u;OA ~O O O ~~ ¢ q ~U cs.U~ ¢U U F-~ x H x ~7 A vs U a a a A .~ U ,~ .~ ~. 0 U 0 U bA .~ U ..r .b .--i N U z 0 U ® ° Crt~' ~O O ~ O Q 69 ~ ~ N sue. ,D C `~ ~ ~ b z~~ o W ;.d U ~ ~ 0 0 U U O ~. a W A F V ~~~n a ~~ A~N ~ +~ A W Q; --~, a ., z a ., '^ d d w w z d ti U W Q d~ Q z U O o~ a W d E-~ W C7 Q W Q a Q a w a Q a A a A a w a z d z d z d z d z d z d z d d F. d F. d E. d E. d F. d F. d F. ,a a U d ,a a U d ,a a U d ,.a a U d ,,.~ a U d ,a a U d ,a a U d az U ~' ° o 0 ~ z H zW Q x `' ~ `' ~ H ~~ ~z W ¢w~ ~ o QuH Wv' A~F W a ~ az w~ wQQ ~ W ~o> W ~ ~oz H vWi~ aw a3a a ~aaz aa~ o s C~! -' !-,' a a~ cd N bA C". .., t--i cd ... .~ cd Q N .D Q z 0 U a~o~ N O ~ ~ p O M xi .--i ~ ~ °' ri ,--~ ,--~ a ~ ~ ~ N ~' O O b~A ~ .b ~o~A 00 ~ U ~ ~ U 0 b N ~ „~ N ~ ao a ,~ w a~ z 0 U U A F U ~~~ rn a ~~ A~N O~~ ~ ~ ti U W ti O a z 0 WU a Az d a a 2~"tw'S iii "~'.~ •::.::: ~ z <'< ~` ' ~~ ' ~" >i~i :iii iiii~ EEiE>E~~~~ ~' ''•.•.•~'' `ii'i}``:::`i `:~:' a z ~.:; ::>:.:~~.,.:. .::.;: .:: :. :::..: ...~: .. ~, <> » » A ~ M ~ ~ N '^ `~ (~1 N ~ M FQ Q a Q Q z Q z z z z z ~ z ~ z ~ z ~ z ~ F, d F. Q F. ¢ E, Q F, ¢ ¢ '~ Q ¢ a d a a a . a A ~ x Q a A w o~z ~ ~" (~ WC7 U A¢W ¢ wz_ ¢ zap a ,~ ~ `'~ ~ ~,, ox~ H z ~w ¢ Boa o ~ z O U i~.~ Q~ ^~^1 i~ U i. a ~ ~ ~~` C1. ~ O [~ '^" ~ O ~ N O ~ ~ p O M N ~'' N '--~ ~--~ a, o cis ~ ~ ~ a~ o~' ~~ ~ A ~. °o ~ °~' U o ~ 'o ° a ~ ~ a w z 0 U U W H A F U ~~~ o~ a ~~ O ~ ~ ti F O a z H WU P~ A x x a a ., z ., °~ a Q d ~II w z Q ., U W A ~ O z °~ U O a W Q i 8 r O ~, O vi v i o0 O O N O~ ~ ~O O~ ~ ~ ~ A ~ ~ N ~ ~ FG z ~ Q ~ z F ~ F a d a ¢ a ~ a d w a °' ~ ~ ~~ z d ~ Q ~ U O Q ~ ~ ~ U Q z z F ~ ~ ~ W H W ~ 0 U .~ 0 ~_ w O .~ O a 0 b U O a O U O a~ .~ N N ~. 0 U C~ it ~--+ U ,!~ H t"'.. O .., 0 U ~ .~ W 0 ~~ >,ooo a~~oo 0000 U~°o°o bcs1- s~~- o d ~ -d Q o Z ~ o ~ o °~' b U o ~ U ~ ~ a~ aUi W 'o a W E"'~ A F U ~ ~n o~ a ~~ Z ~ N O ~ ~ ~Q Qi ti a ., z a ., ~, °~ a rn Q w w z v~ Q ti H w O " a a ~ ~ o ~ F U O a W C7 U Q W A z a ] F ¢ z a a ] H ¢ z ¢ a ~ H Q z ¢ a ~ ~- Q w ~ Q a Q~F Hww F A U O O~~ Q ~x aH° a ° °o oz n n a a o 7 7 U~ ~ U~ H z O U ©- Co ~~°OOo Q n°r, ~ v, o c~ a~~~~ ~; c~ a~ .~ c~ U 0 ti z~~ ~Q a ~ o o U N b a~ a W i.: 0 'C ~. O O U U N O a [W C.... A N U °a a z ~~ ~~ ~~ N ~ ~ ~ ti a x U x U' x x 0 ~I A a w 0 W d x U a a ., z ., ~, °' a rn W w z U W A 0 z ~- 0 W d S W ~ o v, ~ 0 ~ 0 v, 0 v A [ N ~ N W Q ~ z a Q a d w 0 ~ H ~ a~ .., x 0 3 ?~ i-~ .'~ .--i C~ .i b d N w rn - (Q + .. D- ~ BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment C June 27, 1995 BOND PROJECTS COMPLETED DRAINAGE: Mt. Vernon Heights Sierra Drive/Fenwick Drive Green Valley Mason Creek Phase I PARKS AND RECREATION: Walrond Park Soccer Field Northside Realign Fields Bonsack Park Picnic Shelter Vinyard Park I Light Soccer Field Byrd School -Light Baseball Field Starkey Park - 1 Baseball Field Starkey Park - 2 Baseball Fields Facility Repairs -Walrond Office Infield Surface Materials for Baseball Garst Mill Park Starkey Park -Parking Lot Whispering Pines Park Walrond Park 2 Baseball Fields Bonsack Park Ball Field Bonsack Park Playground Equipment Vinyard Park I Parking Green Hill Park - 2 Picnic Shelters Starkey Park -Light 1 Field Facility Repairs -Craig Avenue Center Career Center -Replace Lights Mt. Pleasant Park Brambleton Center Elevator Goode Park Vinyard Park I FIRE HYDRANTS NORTH COUNTY LIBRARY VALLEY TECHPARK AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 27, 1995 RESOLUTION 62795-5 CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Certification Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None ABSENT: None A COPY TESTE: Cv Brenda J. Hol on, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Executive Session r r } ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 27, 1995 RESOLUTION 62795-6 APPROVAL AND ADOPTION OF THE ALLOCATION OF FUNDING FOR THE SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM SIX-YEAR CONSTRUCTION PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 1995-1996 WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on June 27, 1995, to receive comments on the allocation of funding for the Secondary Road System Six-Year Construction Plan for Fiscal Year 1995-1996; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors does hereby approve the allocation of funds for the Secondary Road System Six Year Construction Plan for Roanoke County for Fiscal Year 1995-1996 as shown on the attached construction budget. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution duly attested be forthwith forwarded to the Virginia Department of Transportation Salem Residency Office by the Clerk to the Board. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Ho on, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Virginia Department of Transportation ENCLOSURE 3 Roanoke County S _ / Secondary System Construction Budget Fiscal Year 1995-96 County Wide Incidental B~.ic~aet Items Allocation Rural Additions 5160,920 Pipe Installation- Private Entrances 570,000 Subdivision Plan Review 55,000 Pavement Striping 520,000 ---------------------- $255,920 Regular Numbered Projects Allocation 0613-080-226,C501 5350,000 Fund Construction 0615-080-230,C501 540,000 Fund Deficit 1658-080-223,C501 530,000 Fund Construction 1658-080-223,8667 590,000 Fund Construction 0668-080-229,C501 5750,000 Fund Construction 0636-080-282,C501 $190,000 Fund Construction 0633-080-237,C501 5152,000 Fund Construction 0720-080-281,C501 580,000 Fund Construction 0601-080-233,C501 5900,000 Fund R/W & Construction 0601-080-233,6677 5100,000 Fund PE & Construction 1835-080-288,C501 550,000 Fund Construction 1835-080-288,6675 540,000 Fund Construction 1861-080-289,C501 530,000 Fund Construction 1861-080-289,6676 538,850 Fund Construction 0628-080-232,C501 518,214 Fund R/W 0670-080-284,M501 520,000 Fund PE & R/VV 1867-080-295,C501 520,000 Fund PE 1867-080-295,8678 525,000 Fund PE $2,924,064 Unpaved Road Projects Allocation 0669-080-P83,N501 538,427 ---------------------- $38,427. Total Allocation - $3,218,411 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 27, 1995 AGENDA ITEM• Public Hearing and Adoption of the funding for the Secondary Road System Six-Year Construction Plan for Fiscal Year 1995- 1996. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ..~ ~ /~ -~L'~~-~E~~--- .~-[~k y ~~iG~--Gp-E~a.~ /7 e C- rr~'N/~`~ G:/ (J. "/// o m~ .(((~~~..~ ~ r /3~ .~C-sx-c-r.~.~ L't-~- eA Cti~H,yLV1'~ _ ~ c- C .,- BACKGROUND In accordance with Section 33.1-70.01 of the Code of Virginia, the Board of Supervisors is required to conduct a public hearing concerning the allocation and expenditure of State Secondary Funds for the previously approved projects list on the Six Year Secondary Construction Plan for Fiscal Year 95- 96. The State's Secondary Road System Six Year Construction Plan (based upon recent policy) will be updated every year as opposed to every other year beginning in Fiscal Year 1996. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION On April 26, 1994, the Board of Supervisors reviewed and approved the Secondary Road System Six Year Construction Plan for Fiscal Year (FY) 1994-2000. The allocation of funds for FY 1995-1996 was based upon an estimated $2,225,058 (Enclosure 2) . This year's allocation ($3,218,411) exceeded that estimate and the Six Year Construction Plan has been adjusted accordingly for FY 95-96 (Enclosure 3). ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS Conducting the public hearing involves no expenditures of County funds. S -/ STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors conduct the public hearing and approve the allocation of funds for FY 95- 96. ITTED BY: APPROVED BY: nold Covey, Directo Elmer C. Hodge~- of Engineering & Insp ctions County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Motion by: No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens pc: Virginia Department of Transportation ~ -/ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 27, 1995 RESOLUTION APPROVAL AND ADOPTION OF THE ALLOCATION OF FUNDING FOR THE SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM SIX-YEAR CONSTRUCTION PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 1995-1996. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on June 27, 1995, to receive comments on the allocation of funding for the Secondary Road System Six-Year Construction Plan for Fiscal Year 1995-1996; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors does hereby approve the allocation of funds for the Secondary Road System Six Year Construction Plan for Roanoke County for Fiscal Year 1995-1996 as shown on the attached construction budget. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution duly attested be forthwith forwarded to the Virginia Department of Transportation Salem Residency Office by the Clerk to the Board. Recorded Vote Moved by: _ Seconded by: Yeas: Nays: A Copy Teste: Mary Allen, Board Clerk S `~ TABLE OF CONTENTS AGENDA 1. INTRODUCTION 2. COUNTYWIDE ITEMS PAGE (S ) 1 & 2 2 & 3 -RURAL ADDITION PRIORITY LIST ENCL 1 3. NUMBERED PROJECTS -SIX YEAR ROAD PLAN 5-12 ENCL 2 -SIX YEAR CONSTRUCTION BUDGET ENCL 3 S _f ROANOKE COUNTY'S SIX YEAR SECONDARY CONSTRUCTION PLAN FOR FY 1995 THRU 1996 Last Year Roanoke County and the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) staff updated the Six Year Plan for FY 1994-2000. This year, the Board of Supervisors will be required to approve the allocation of funds based upon that plan. The Board previously approved this year's Revenue Sharing Project list in March; therefore, we will not be addressing any incidental items with this year's construction funds. Roanoke County's allocation this year for the Six Year Construction Plan will be $3,218,411 based upon current information. This is almost $1.0 million more than previously estimated for this year. The Virginia Department of Transportation and County staff allocated this year's funds based upon the prioritized list in the Six Year Plan with a few exceptions. Priority number 1 through 13, 20, 23 and 24 received funding this year (see Enclosure 3). The bridge on Verndale Drive (priority #20) was the only project which received funds out of order due to a re-inspection by VDOT staff. An inspection revealed the bridge abutments were scouring faster than anticipated and VDOT staff felt the project should receive a higher priority. As stated in the Board report, The Board of Supervisors is required by State Law to review and update the Six Year Plan at least every two years. It has been Roanoke County's policy to revise and update the Six Year Plan during the even numbered years and only approve the allocation of funds in the odd numbered years. However, recent policy change is recommending that the Six Year Plan be updated every year due to new funding guidelines generated by the ISTEA Act of 1990. Therefore, staff plans to revise and update the Six Year Plan every year beginning next year. FUNDING BREAK-DOWN There are three funding categories in the Six Year Plan: Countywide Items, Incidental Items, and Numbered Projects. Unpaved Roads are included under Numbered Projects. Staff will attempt to summarize each category and project below: 3 s-~ COUNTYWIDE ITEMS: Items include traffic signs, entrance culverts and Rural Addition Roads. This year's Rural Addition priority list is enclosed for your review and approval (see enclosure #1). Staff has allocated $255,920 to this category of which the maximum amount allowed ($160,920) will be used for Rural Addition projects. Following is a review of each road anticipated to be completed or worked on in the next year: BUSHDALE ROAD: Construction has been completed and a ribbon cutting ceremony was held last June. Note: Well driller has been selected to relocate Mr. Owens well. Plan to have issue resolved this summer. CHESTER DRIVE: VDOT has accepted Chester Drive into the State's Secondary System and construction should begin sometime this fall. Staff estimates this project to cost approximately $80,000. CAMNEY LANE: VDOT also has accepted Camney Lane into the Secondary System and construction should begin sometime this fall. Staff estimated this project to cost approximately $80,000. PINKARD COURT (VALLEY AVE, PINKARD ST, SUMMIT AVE. AND WASHINGTON ROAD): Staff should be submitting these projects to VDOT this summer. These roads will cost approximately $150,000 to construct. The Board has previously approved Revenue Sharing Funds to assist with the improvements to the roads currently in the State's Secondary System; however, additional funding may be required next year after VDOT receives their bids. SAGEWOOD CIRCLE: Staff has completed the preliminary field work and engineering to determine the necessary right-of-way for this project and the property owners have agreed to dedicate this ROW. We are completing the final engineering drawings and will proceed with the ROW acquisition this year. The plans should be ready to submit to VDOT by next spring. The preliminary cost estimate is approximately $100,000 and this year's allocation should cover this. Staff anticipates beginning work on CABIN CREEK DRIVE and LAWYER DRIVE within the next two years. We have also received petitions on the following roads and have added these roads to our updated rural addition list (Encl 1) as priority numbers 20 thru 23: 4 S-/ PRIORITY #3 CRESTHILL DR (SR 613): TRAFFIC COUNT:1911 PREVIOUS FUNDING:321,000 ADDITIONAL FUNDING:120,000 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST:441,000 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: REPLACE CULVERT & IMPROVE APPROACHES STATUS: VDOT HELD THE PUBLIC HEARING ON APRIL 21, 1994 AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY'S ADMINISTRATION BUILDING AND THE BOARD RECOMMENDED WE PROCEED WITH THIS PROJECT IN MAY 94. AN ADDITIONAL $80,000 HAS BEEN ALLOCATED FOR A TOTAL FY95/96 OF $120,000 TO THIS PROJECT. THE PROJECT IS 100% FUNDED. ESTIMATED ADVERTISEMENT DATE:OCT 1995 ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: NOV 1996 PROPOSED FUNDING: FY95/96: 120,000 PRIORITY #4 YELLOW MNT RD (SR 668): TRAFFIC COUNT:730 PREVIOUS FUNDING:1,226,680 ADDITIONAL FUNDING:1,002,320 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST:2,229,000 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: IMPROVE TWO LANE SECTION TO TODAY'S STANDARD. STATUS: VDOT HELD A PUBLIC HEARING ON MARCH 16, 1994 AT CLEARBROOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL AND THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RECOMMENDED WE CONTINUE WITH THIS PROJECT SHORTLY THEREAFTER. AN ADDITIONAL $250,000 WAS ALLOCATED THIS YEAR FOR A TOTAL FY 95/96 ALLOCATION OF $750,000. AS SOON AS THE ROW AND PLANS ARE COMPLETED VDOT CAN PROCEED WITH ADVERTISE- MENT AS SCHEDULED SINCE 70o OF THE CONSTRUCTION MONEY HAS BEEN ALLOCATED. ESTIMATED ADVERTISEMENT DATE:APR 1996 ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: OCT 1997 PROPOSED FUNDING: FY95/96: 750,000 FY96/97:252,320 PRIORITY #5 GLADE CRK RD (SR 636): TRAFFIC COUNT:367 PREVIOUS FUNDING:351,165 ADDITIONAL FUNDING:190,000 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST:541,165 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: IMPROVE ROAD AND INSTALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES. STATUS: PLANS ARE IN THE FINAL STAGES AND AS SOON AS ROW HAS BEEN ACQUIRED VDOT CAN PROCEED WITH THE ADVERTISEMENT DATE. THE PROJECT IS 100% FUNDED. ESTIMATED ADVERTISEMENT DATE:JUNE 1995 ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: JULY 1996 PROPOSED FUNDING: FY95/96: 190,000 PRIORITY #6 & 7 BENOIS RD (SR 633): TRAFFIC COUNT:950 PREVIOUS FUNDING:447,000 ADDITIONAL FUNDING:152,000 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST:599,000 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: IMPROVE TWO LANE SECTION TO TODAY'S STANDARDS AND RAILROAD CROSSING. STATUS: CONSTRUCTION SHOULD BEGIN SOME TIME IN LATE SUMMER. ESTIMATED ADVERTISEMENT DATE: MAY 1995 ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: JUL 1996 PROPOSED FUNDING: FY95/96: 152,000 6 PRIORITY #8 COLONIAL AVE (SR 687): TRAFFIC COUNT:5723 PREVIOUS FUNDING:250,000 ADDITIONAL FUNDING:80,000 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST:330,000 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: IMPROVE VERTICAL SIGHT DISTANCE. STATUS: VDOT HELD A PUBLIC HEARING ON MAY 26, 1994 AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY'S ADMINISTRATION BUILDING TO DISCUSS THIS PROJECT AND THE BOARD OF SUPERVISOR'S VOTED TO PROCEED WITH THIS PROJECT SHORTLY THEREAFTER. THE PROJECT IS 100% FUNDED. ESTIMATED ADVERTISEMENT DATE: FEB 1996 ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: SEPT 1996 PROPOSED FUNDING: FY95/96: 80,000 PRIORITY #9 HOLLINS RD (SR 601): TRAFFIC COUNT:5628 PREVIOUS FUNDING:1,067,000 ADDITIONAL FUNDING:3,433,000 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST:4,500,000 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: PURCHASE ROW FOR ULTIMATE FIVE LANE ROAD. FIVE LANES WILL BE CONSTRUCTED FROM RT 115 PAST THE BRIDGE THREE LANES PAST HANOVER DIRECT AND TWO LANES TO THE END OF THIS PROJECT. STATUS: SOME FIELD WORK HAS BEEN COMPLETED, ADDITIONAL IS NEEDED. A FIELD REVIEW WILL BE CONDUCTED IN AUGUST. AN ADDITIONAL $378,000 WAS ALLOCATED FOR A TOTAL FY95/96 ALLOCATION OF $1,000,000. THE TOTAL COST OF THIS PROJECT MAY HAVE TO BE ADJUSTED DEPENDING ON THE ROW COST. ESTIMATED ADVERTISEMENT DATE:APR 1997 ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: NOV 1998 PROPOSED FUNDING: FY95/96 1,000,000 FY96/97:1,125,000 FY97/98: 1,308,000 PRIORITY #10 ARDMORE DR (SR 1835): TRAFFIC COUNT:580 PREVIOUS FUNDING:320,800 ADDITIONAL FUNDING:90,000 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST:410,800 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: REPLACE EXISTING BRIDGE AND IMPROVE APPROACHES. STATUS: THE PROJECT HAS BEEN DESIGNED AND 1000 FUNDED. ESTIMATED ADVERTISEMENT DATE:JAN 1996 ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: OCT 1996 PROPOSED FUNDING: FY95/96:90,000 PRIORITY #11 CLEARWATER AVE (SR 1861): TRAFFIC COUNT:739 PREVIOUS FUNDING:294,800 ADDITIONAL FUNDING:68,850 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST:363,650 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: REPLACE EXISTING BRIDGE AND IMPROVE APPROACHES. STATUS: ENGINEERING HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE PROJECT IS 1000 FUNDED. ESTIMATED ADVERTISEMENT DATE: JAN 1996 ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: OCT 1996 PROPOSED FUNDING: FY95/96: 68,850 7 -/ PRIORITY #12 WOODHAVEN RD (SR 628): TRAFFIC COUNT:1997 PREVIOUS FUNDING:51,000 ADDITIONAL FUNDING:449,000 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST:500,000 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: CURVE IMPROVEMENT. STATUS: FUNDING $18,214 FOR FIELD WORK AND PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING.. ESTIMATED ADVERTISEMENT DATE:JUN 1997 ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: MAY 1998 PROPOSED FUNDING: FY95/96: 18,214 FY96/97:150,000 FY97/98: 150,000 FY98/99:130,786 PRIORITY #13 LOST MNT RD (SR 670): TRAFFIC COUNT:63 PREVIOUS FUNDING:73,657 ADDITIONAL FUNDING:71,343 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST:145,000 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: REPLACE LOW WATER BRIDGE. STATUS: PRELIMINARY FIELD WORK IS COMPLETED. AN ADDITIONAL $20,000 WAS FUNDED THIS YEAR, TO ENGINEERING AND PURCHASE ROW. ESTIMATED ADVERTISEMENT DATE:AUG 1996 ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: MAY 1997 PROPOSED FUNDING: FY95/96: 20,000 FY96/97:51,343 PRIORITY #20 VERNDALE DR (SR 1867): TRAFFIC COUNT:4558 PREVIOUS FUNDING: 0 ADDITIONAL FUNDING:361,000 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST:361,000 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: BRIDGE REPLACEMENT AND APPROACH IMPROVEMENTS. STATUS: THIS YEAR'S ALLOCATION WILL FUND THE ENGINEERING PLANS. THE BRIDGE HAS DETERIORATED AND MAY NEED TO BE ACCELERATED WITHIN THE PLAN NEXT YEAR. ESTIMATED ADVERTISEMENT DATE:MAR 1998 ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: DEC 1998 PROPOSED FUNDING: FY95/96: 45,000 FY96/97:243,800 FY97/98: 72,200 Priority #14 thru #19 AND #21 AND #22 will not receive any funding this year. 8 ~! UNPAVED ROADS The following gravel roads have been funded or will receive funding this year: PRIORITY #23 COX HOPKINS RD (SR 1835): TRAFFIC COUNT:75 PREVIOUS FUNDING:132,000 ADDITIONAL FUNDING: 0 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST:132,000 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: STRAIGHTEN CURVES AND SURFACE TREAT. STATUS: WILL BE CONSTRUCTED IN CONJUNCTION WITH YELLOW MNT ROAD AND HAS BEEN 100a FUNDED. ESTIMATED ADVERTISEMENT DATE:APR 1996 ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: DEC 1996 PROPOSED FUNDING: FY95/96: 0 PRIORITY #24 PATTERSON DR (SR 669): TRAFFIC COUNT:73 PREVIOUS FUNDING:34,831 ADDITIONAL FUNDING:250,169 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST:285,000 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: STRAIGHTEN CURVES AND SURFACE TREAT. STATUS: PE FUNDED, AN ADDITIONAL $11,835 WAS ALLOCATED THIS YEAR FOR A TOTAL ALLOCATION OF $38,427. ESTIMATED ADVERTISEMENT DATE:NOV 2000 ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: DEC 2001 PROPOSED FUNDING: FY95/96: 38,427 Again, the remainder of the roads will not receive any funding until we update NEXT YEAR. THIS CONCLUDES OUR UPDATE ON THE STATE'S SECONDARY SYSTEM SIX YEAR CONSTRUCTION PLAN FOR THIS YEAR. 9 ENCLOSURE 1 RURAL ADDITION PRIORITY LIST ~~"- .~ / 1992-94 ROAD (1) Washington Rd FAMILIES PROBLEMS ESTIMATED DISTANCE SERVED SEEN COST 600' 3 Possible damage 2 houses. $150,000 (2) Sagewood Cir. 1100' 5 (3) Cabin Creek Dr. 500' 6 (4) Lawyer Dr. 1600' 8 (5) Autumn Dr. 700' 3 (6) Bluebird Ln. 3400' 9 (7) Creekside Dr. 1100' 3 (8) Artrip Ln. 300' 4 (9) Smokey Ridge Rd. 800' 6 (10) Indian Hill Rd. 1300' 4 (11) Hemlock Ave. 1500' S (12) Raintree 2600' 15 (13) Chestnut Mtn. Cir. 500' 6 (14) Southview Dr. 800' 5 (15) Williams Ave. 300' 6 (16) Lucado St. 700' 5 Coordination with CDBG project. Right of way & drainage $100,000 required. Significant grading. Create steep driveways. Right of way & drainage $ 60,000 easement required. Significant property damage. Drainage problems. $120,000 Walls in right of way. Speculative interest. Right of way & drainage $ 50,000 easement required. Speculative interest. Drainage easement required. $170,000 Speculative interest. 18o grade. Speculative $ 80,000 interest. Right of way & drainage $ 20,000 easement required. Right of way & drainage $ 60,000 easements required. Turn around area may be a problem. Private property damage. Right of way & drainage $105,000 easements required. Speculative interest. Right of way & drainage $150,000 easements required. Significant private property damage. Right of way & drainage $325,000 easements required. Adjacent to Parkway. Right of way & easements $ 37,500 required. Right of way & easements $ 80,000 required. Right of way easements $ 22,500 required. Right of way easements $ 87,500 required. ROAD (17) Kathryn Dr (18) Harmony Ln (19) Empire Ln (20) Alcoa Rd. (21) Willow Valley (22) Falling Crk. (23) Rusty Rd (24) Crescent Ln Woodland Ln J FAMILIES PROBLEMS ESTIMATED DISTANCE SERVED SEEN COST 790' 4 ROW required, stream $ 60,000 crossing and difficult horizontal alignment. 900' 8 Right of way & drainage $ 60,000 easement required. 370' 3 possible speculative $ 20,000 involved. 1109' 8 APCO lines, row req'd $ 82,500 stormwater management 3600' 4 ROW req'd, possible $ 270,000 spec. interest, SWM 800' 3 Adjacent to Wolf Crk, $ 60,000 ROW req'd, spec Interest 300' 7 ROW req'd, steep terrain, $ 45,000 sight dist. problems 1000' it ROW req'd, spec. inter., $ 75,000 utility reloc. N 04 O a U W U: f Z G C v G ~_..~ W iL :..: F Y C O ~. O } Z Z ~~` ¢ C G G ~-+ } ~ ~ .^_ ~ _ } _ Z ~' I- ~., z ~n ~ c; z - w C• O u; ~, U .., - r 1 ~ q ~; ~. O N I Cd i N u7 q c N r, 1 n Q I ~ o nJ q ~ c I s\ ~ , O i ~ u7 q n ~ ~ I C F! M N vi N cT t tr i q N to u i t.~ u7 I N ! ! I N N N N CJ N I~ 1 1 14 1 I 1 I ! ~ i 1 1 n O C1 ~-' O q ! 6~ C I to C ~ n O O 1~ F=- I .~ ;~ ~ N C C i~ C I N n .-~ u7 N v7 1 to 1 n .a .o c u> ~n t o { ~ tq +A ca " I 1 a ~+ I ~ 1 ~i '.° 1 i I I I I I I i ! C1 ;~ c q C ' ! JJ ~; CJ (\ C I I O c .p u; I .. .. ., .. .. = ~ G 1 q i~J \ '~ N C I n w l c q c o ! c~ w ! ~ I 1 N •--~ ! q i I I 1 f I t i I i i ! is n v N '~ F i O V7 (`') C~ (`') '~ 1 .C I In i n ~ q " O •-! I N N N N CJ q !7 I N 3 1 b3 +4 fl `.' EFf 'Pr I N w I I 4!3 Z I I I 1 I 1 i I I 1 I I I I I 1 I 1 ~ .~ ~ x ~ 0 1 c! c ~ m C I Q I 1 I I ! I I w l v ~~ ~ ^~ ~~ c I } i ~ c. c m ~• c i~ I (:~ .n L^ V ~ ~ I J I ri -i .1 .-. .--1 -+ 1 Q I I ~ i I O I I F 1 t 1 1 ~ 1 ' 1 ~ 1 ~ I I W i ,. r I W ~ Q r i c D 1 ~ G N' I ~ t i D I i ~ti ~1 i I 1 ^ J i 1 r 1 1 I I I t ~ ~.. I 1 1 1 I G ~ C :~ _ 1J cl i ! N Z C O .n c ~ Z I ~ ~„ ,~ z F G ,_ ~ C LJ J I ::J r t-- Z i " v . ! o~ 1 ~' ~ ~i V r J t G C C ~~`' `" ~ 1 t L c_ I ~ n ' > t C Q I I t ~\ L/ ~ I I I 1 I I .~ .~'-/ S-~ 0 . I I I r r r l r r I I 0000 - I o000 000 - I o00o r o00o r 0000 - I o00o I o000 000o I o000 apJ r- d r .m Lr of r ~r r r I r l r l r I r r . o000 000o r coon r o000 ~ o00o 10000 --~ o00o I o00o r o00o r o000 ;p: o0 Ipl o0 :~; eQ Ir. I I I I.r I I r r I I I o00o I o00o r 0000 r o00o I ocoo 10000 - I o00o I o00o I o00o r o000 I O I P I 00 ~ 6 ~ P I P I 00 I O I P I r 1^ I I 1 I J I I I I I r I I I r¢ 1 I 1 t r I I I r I I 1 I I I I I r I I 1 r I I 0000 I 0000 I 0000 10000 I 0000 r 0000 1 0000 10000 I 0000 10000 00 m 00 I K I P /th 1 6 1 N 00 ~ Y I P I 1 I I I I 1 1 r I I I I r I t I I I r 0000 I OOU'9 u'f r 0000 0000 0000 10000 000 r 0000 10000 10000 00 Wm O i u i C~ l 00 m ~rp O ~0 N N 00 NN 1 N I I r r r I r = P I P I 6 P I W I^ I 1 I I I I i r I I 1 Z [C P I r r I r I I I I .r 1 I I 1 I I r I I r I I N ¢~lf I 1 r I I I I r I I ~~~~~- _^~~~^_ ~~~~~^_ 6CL I 0000 0000 r 0000 0000 r 0000 r OOOO OO 0000 r 060000 000000 ±00000 N 6 ~ W ~ 000 00 O 00 00 O 00 Z~ ~ O 00 T O~~ _ i P I ~0 ~~ pe pe 00 N~ ^^ G T C .n ~ IeOf .-..-. .--..-. O V W i P l 0 0 ^+ ~+ `.C I S I ~~ I I I ... N I I I r I I N Z ~!f I I I I I I I r I I I 1 t u 10000 0000 10000 I OOOO 10000 I OOOO 10000 r 0000 I OOOO I OOOo 000 O .O .O O 00 00 NC0O 000 000 e O 00 00 00 00 0.00 O O ~ P i ~_~ mm r 00 00 NN ^= NN ^~+ O~ ^^ Wm ~ P ~ 00 e r P I I I I I I I I I I r r I I r r I I 100000 00 000 r 000000 0000 10000 GOON r 0000 ~ 0000 0000 12Zw r ~~ 00 00 00 000 00 00 00 I O.•.K I NN mW NN P~ NN ~h PauO'Y NN 00 ••••.-• r r r r r 1 I r r r I I pW.O.. I NN ^`~ r p aC l 11 I I I 1 r I r r 6 t r I I r I 1 1 0000 O u~uY NO~P r 0000 10000 10000 000 r 0000 0000 r 0000 i Vf OOI~r~ u')OOm I O 00 r 00000 O 00 1 OCO d 10000 0000 O 00 102 00~•^ OO~nm I O 00 000 O 00 I OHO r 0000 0000 _ ~ >O ~ 00... ~.. ~ Oe O-N m m r N~N^sN~ ~N I ~v n NO.Oif `O c.ON mO Opp Oe ^ S ~ ^ 0000 0000 NOON 000 0000 10000 0000 0000 10000 000 00 000 OOr['f ~O 000 10000 r O 00 10000 00 100000 rtO 00 i W 00 P; 0000 r 0000 I O O 10000 ~; O 00~~ 10000 I OOOO~d r 000 I O OOH OO PP I OOOOPP r Oe Oe PP I O~PP r O~^0PP I mPP I OOPPPP r ~OOOPP r O PPP r O^PP I 161--• NOPP r ^PP I N~-••O.OPP I m P r u'IOPP r N P I OONPP r O~~PP I v~rPPP r O^PP I I Z N 0 O ri l ~--r .--• r ~. ^ ^ ~ ~O •--r ^ I •-• ^ N N'+ ~+ I 0 u~ e N ~--• -•~ r .-. a -~ ~-• ~--~ ^ ~• ^ -+ N r--O N r~.0 ~ ^ eC0 I 00 r 00 ~ n~ ^NPN I ~ uY ~ alrV NOO I ^00 t 00 I 00 I O^ r 00 I 00 r 00 r O W32r-pp ~ W3Z^00 ~ W321--00 ~ W3o'-GO ~ W32r--•pG ~ W3ZT6O i W3_Z~-00 ~ W32r-OG ~ W32~-GG ~ W3Z•-OG ~ OO¢V r •~OO6V r OO6V I •~ OGV I OO6V I OOGV I OO6V r OOGV I OO6V r OOGV 1 I dKUTWW r dCGV^WW I dCCV^WW I dCCV`-WW I dK Vr•~WW I dd'Vr---WW I dC UTWW I G.CVr-WW I d~YV^WW I dCV~-WW I O 0 ^ ...r O W I O .O ~~ ~ e .¢.r Q .... .-...p _-. ^ I K..~ .-.r .--r N d t Vf uO'1 O n O ~ KD: ~ Or ~ 00 ~ NP•--• d I ZO r L ~~r- .rY d ~O dV I `uK 1 6Vlr---O V W T¢ •--~Z ~ LC W m Z ~ ~V Z ~ Mme WZ I ^2 I OVOC V•••~Z ~ C•--•Z I ¢ ~~ I OJ LO I Z OOW I Z •O I OuO r -J O I ~ ~Z ZO r ~ SO r - LO r ~CCZ I ¢.O I ¢ON^aV r GO O•--• I ~0 r Q: O.O r- -+ n N K I dC7 r 1 ONO NP`- I JN JOCC Z~- I ONe ~--•~- I ON^¢uT ~ ZN fir-- YmWCO^ ~ 00 •u'r^ r O`M3~ I ~N~--r P WN ~0V 16NSr--•0U I N Gm i uW o r ccN~~O= I^ r L~~aC I r---~>W WO I J r .pWJO I~ I > > I O tO •~ I r =O ~ I O O= O I O i^ ~ cO~--~^O~ r ~O BOO WCOC I O~+uOCC I OCO~Y~ I LO NOC I u0 OCG I COOP OK I COZO i Y .. I ~m~UO¢ I ym CCO`-- r OT I r--rm CDON..^ I 00~••~ r NO tNS VrO ¢ Y r~ I LOrW ~~N I OP6^m I OW V~•-Vf I ~Or--GZN') r ~O^W~+Yf r 30'-• ~a/f r SN r r W --0~ OV Z I r y0 ZO I I ^~JZO I O r .^ Z r r r--•2 r .--. •r2 r P'.' G ~ O ~ ~O ~ ¢O~d2V ~ ¢~O4~W r ~OY~V i Nm ¢CC Vim O mOCC a~O r C.pOmv'f0 I OO00O ~0 r .--. r OJZ •--•OV I •. ••ZV 16~•• ZV 120.. .. I ZO.•••••O ^6 O I uO ^d'OWW r r- Cd^> r .OC6•-W r V~~d?W I VJ~~=W I W~01'OWW I OCOWW I W.JCOWW I LCG^ r m r LOLLr-JK r yfOY.GNO r OmmNOC I it OOC r CC I YOW^J~ r t7OW^JOC I [OOW~-JCC I mOWCt^ .... I 00 00 --_ u'Yn .ltd I ~^ ~~ `f~jN 0.lr .n d \ I m ~ ^ ~00 ~~ ~ Ord - ~. J ~ I dPr~ ^ ~ dG~N_^ O V ~ O v~ ~ ~- ~ O ^ r- ~. a ~- r-. r O^ 0 0 .p V I O M V .O I o - LC fT-. i ~ W O I ¢ ~•• 0Q 0C ^~CCWO I W^.O~~f•1 O0C I W ~W~ CW 0~ ..+ ~ O I CC rW- rW- ~ ~ T rW rC N N ~ r N ~ T r- r ~ r- ^ r ^ W ~- T W OI I ~.. ..66....r ~.. ..Zd~r ~.. ..ZO....I ~.. .. ^O_..rr ~.. •-Z6~...1 ~.. ••ZG....I ~.. ..'~4v1 ~.. ••261 ~-... +.C~I ~ -Zd...~l 00 I OVOr-r- I OVGOr- r OVOOfY I OVCO~L I OVOOr-- I OVOO^ r O~V pVr- I OVOO~--• I ~VOO^ ~ OVOOCC I I 1 y T .-. v7 Vf 1 K r u-. V Vl 1 CC I-- ^ V CC1 r OC ^^ V m 1 CC ^ •-+ V N I CC r- ^ V N r '-- .n r K ~-- •--• v ~/+ 1 r ~-. V N I OC ^ •--~ V¢ s-J 0 =N -- s ~- o ¢ ~ o i ~ ~ ~ d ~ ~ ~ i ~ i ~ ~ ~ z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ o 0 0 0 X 0 0 00 X 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 X 0 0 0 0 X 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 00 0 ~ 00 00 X 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 000 ¢ o ~ i r- d ~ i ¢ L ~ m o o 0 0 0 ~ o 0 0 0 ~ o 0 0 o i o 0 0 0 ~ o 0 0 0 ~ o 0 0 0 ~ o 0 0 0 X 0 0 00 X 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 000 ~ o i ~ 6 ~ P ~ P ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 00 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 000 Z ~ 00 O ~ P ~ O O _ P s ¢ P rr P ~ O ~ 1 ~ J ~ 1 I J I ~ 1 1 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 6~ 1 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ 1 1 ~ 1 I ~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~ 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 X 0 0 OO 00 O O vm m X 0 0 0 0 X 0 0 00 X 0 0 0 0 X 0 0 0 0 X 0 0 0 0 X 0 0 0 0 ~ O 000 i m ~ 00 rf (n 00 00 d' H~eO't f~(O-f-f ¢ P O O ...~ r ~ P ~ mm err 1 y 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~ 1 1 1 ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ + •~_t~r_~~~ ~~~~~~ t_r~~~~~+-~~_~~_r~~~~~~-±0000 ~_~_~-r~~_r--r~~~~~~r~~~r~t-~-~~~-t 1 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 000 00 ~ 0 000 00 X 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O 1 0 0 0 0 O O O ~ O OMt•'i O O O 00 O O O O O O O O O O O O i 6 ~ P i N0 ^^ n~N ~-O-r .~ NN ~ O ~ ^ ~ 1 y 1 P 1 A n •..' ...~ ¢ P 1 r I 1 1 1 1 CC P ~ C^ 1 1 ~ 1 1 ~ 1 1 1 1 ~ 1 1 ~ 1 1 ~ 1 O^ _ 1 d•J+ ~ t~~w_~_~~~ ~__~~~~_y-~~~~~~~w_r..r._t~~~~~~~w~~~~~~_t... r...+_~~~~~~~-~~r-~_~~~~~rr~t 6C X 0 0 0 0 X 0 0 0 0 ~ O O~ d o 0 0 0 X 0 0 0 0 ~ O O O N X 0 0 0 0 X 0 0 0 0 X 0 0 0 0 ~ O 000 6 C p l O O Oo 00 O O O O Z-~ ` ~ 00 .O 00 mm O-~y ; i P 1 mm ~~ NH PP .O.p .o .O ~~ O ~ P ~ 1 1 C 1 ~~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 d N I i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Yt l 1 1 ~ ~ ~ 1 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ O O O O X 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 O O O O X 0 0 0 0 i O,O ~ O X 0 0 0 0 X 0 0 0 0 X 0 0 0 0 ~ O OWN V O O ~ 60 00 O O O O O O ~ O O O O ~ O O O a O O 0 0 ~ O O m O m ~ O O O r m ~ O O O - P ~ P ~ 00 um'i ~.p~ O N ~v~ O 00 rrfv O ~0 mm T ~ r .-. N N ~ O O O O O O O ~ 00 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O ~ O 000 O u'~O~ ~ O OO OOO ~ OOOO ¢ V• p~ O O 0 0 0 0 ~ O O O m O m ~ O O O .G O ~O ~ O 0 0 O O O X 0 0 0 0 00 Op7 ~ mm ~ ~/OiNm O fOfM ~PUO's , u0Y Ntr'a r<~ O NN f-fs NOHV v< 1 1 ~ 1 1 1 1 1 I ~ 1 p W w i N N ~ p K~ 1 1 ~ 1 I 1 ~ ~ 1 6 ~ 1 1 X 0 0 0 0 X 0 0 0 0 ~ 00 00 X 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 X 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 X 0 0 0 0 ~ O 00 O ~a.7 ~ 0000 ~ O O ~ O O ~ O O ~ 00 O ~ O O , 00 O ~ O 00 ~ p r I~ ~ N N N N ~!f K 10.. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 00 O O O ~ 00 00 0 0 t 0 O ~ O O O O O O O N O u-s 1 0 O O ~~ 0 0 0 ~ O 00 p ~ 0000 00 ~ O 00 ~ OmOm ~ O 00 ~ 0.000 ~ O 00 000^ ~ 0000_^ ~ O 00 ^ ~ OOOOC ~ OOO OPP ~ ~ OO PP 00~lfPP ~ Vs~P ~ 0.00^PP~ ~'Y N P i ~N~OOP-P ~ ~O~~PP ~ N mOPP ~ W nO•P ~ ~~~NPP ~~PP ~ N^a~PP ~ •O t"~PP ~ r P~ PP ~ O _ _ S V+ ~Nln ~~ ~ rr ~. Nt7 .-~^ ~ ^ NNrr 1 l7 r r ... ^O - - Vl Va M ~ NMO~ ON 00 ~ 00 ~ Oml Nm ~ ~•O ./'f m~ 1 ^ O O O ~ O O 0 0 1 0 0~ ~ W3~~--~G- i W3Z0 ~-p0 ~ W3Z^Jp i W3Z^Op ~ 32~•Op ~ W32~-Opp W2Z~-p0 ~ W3Z~--•.~G ~ W3~~--pp ~ W3Z^00 ~ 00¢~~ ~ 06 V ~ 006V ~ 00¢V ~ W~006V ~ 006V ~ 006V ~ 00¢V ~ 006V ~ 00¢V ~ ~ d~V^W+l ~ 1CV.--•W W ~ dKV ~ dKV rWW ~ dd'V^WW ~ dCV~-WW«dC V'-WW ~ dCV~-WW~dC V~-WW 1 dKV^WW ~ W ~ e .0 N r W pW 1 C mp .Om ...• 6-+d~l~Y 1 ¢a.00S ~ 00 w ~ ~~^Kd' ~~ Z ~ 00 KO,W i OdN ~~ .rOis~ ~r'f2 ~m .mu ~ ~m = ~ ZJIr-mW ~ Z.O OW c Ch^m m^J•^_•V i ~O I~V~ ^ VC YLZI mKN••-• V ~+ m UK C m~-~]C IpV^N~--~L~ ZGL OC LL`30~ ^~ `^3 L i pe~•i u'~00~ ~ _ ^ _^>'O -rNr- i 6P Ou ~ Q~CUZ •atw ~ 2_-NOCU ~ Z ~ OM W~ ~ ymd: W ~ j~~r Or ~ O~N_3.n ~ .~ .lf JfWC 1 ~ ~` ~ 7m O ~ QON Z.O ~- ~ CN 2 N ~ .--• •OC C •K~- r~.m0 ~ F¢-.m Y ~ ~N^rt7m ~ ~ QN~--. -•6 ••-• ^O~ ~ KN~+ ~ WNZVfW ~ CN~•~.'- aCC Nr~~V ~ Xp ~ u~ L~ ~ 0= ~ LOr~ ~ C ~ LW ~ ~ p i Z Z 1 p LW> Wac 1 ~ LAW 1 ZoL~--•o= r 2 LW m6 ~ Z ~ ZW~-•Z ~ O m0 O D: ~ 1 O OGO Ou^ ~ KO ^O~OSZ O W ¢ ~ 00 S^m ~ p0 6 ~ 1 ymOd.. ~ NmP .• 1 Nm mO m^ •• ~ 1 Wmrp ~ 6m0 V^ ~ =mNW> 7 a ••- ^ ~ OmOVG ~ =mOWmN ~ Or •` ~ ~OUIJ~Vf ~ vO~+h-W ~ ~O^~6 ~ QOr~-W ~ ~O •6^ OOVO O•--•^S ~ LON6~-W ~ ONV Z O 1 p ~ Z •^ Z ~ VY~ ~ O OC ~ 47Y ~ 00 •6 ~c ~ S •Z^ •O J 1 •6CC Z ~ ~ ONOSt7 J~-.020 ~ J••+OO OW ~ ZOO ~KW ~ L~10~pW ~ 6~-. KC ~ 6••-.OJNW ~ GWO^C~1> ~ rOOCIY r- 1 ~--OOJWOO ~ ¢ ~. .. ..Z O•- ••ZV ~ O •-K^W ~ p~f .. d7 1 GM••~•--~W ~ W~••O.W •.dmW ~ O_N.• ..Z C ~ VfN ..d W^ ~ V1N .. d'-6 ~ ~ ~ ' VOWOW ~ O.OK OW W ~ 0~0~ NmV ~ Km~~dO ~ Ctmd''-C~ ~ Vml~i ¢~ ~ Vm Kw~`OU ~ •CK OW v ~ Oo~d~•--• ~ Oo~W~¢J ~ ¢ ~ W -~ ~"' J ~ SOWS-J OC ~ SO ~ 6r 6 ~ 6^Y•N G~V ~ O r ~~ ~ 30~r^J_ 60J ~ 3V~ ~ __ N~~O ~ ONN i ON^ u'sN~ ~ V'~O~ v _ _ Mu O .0U ' O .0V m ~ P ~ f'nQ P ~ ¢ O ~N...¢ O ~ ~ ~ r¢ C 2 W r ¢ C Z ~ = K C d V: d ~ W ~ _ _ p 1 ^ ^ r- ti- ^ N ^ r r ~ ~ ~-• ^ ^ ~-- O~ K ~ ~.. ..Zd~~O dvi ~.. ..+~.... gip. .. rO~..~i 0.. ..ZO~...~0.. ..ZO-_.~ O••--Z~i W.. .. d~..~~ p.. ..Z¢~.~~.. ..Z6~i p ~ ~VpO^ ~ OVp O••• ~ O~V p`O ~s Vp Om ~ ~V OOGC ~ Os ~p Om ~ OSV OOC I OVJ Or OV pO^ ~ 2`p OV^ ~ i 1 r ~-. N 1 K. r V N ~ r- ~.. to 1 ^.--. ~ r V m ~ .--. i r- ^ Oi r S .~.-~ /~ ~ K ~-- .-.. V N ~ r ~n s-l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I r o 00 0 00 0o r 000 o I oo oo_-_ 1 0000 I oo NN 1000000 000000 1000000 1 0000 po W o0 00 00 0 ~ o0 00 00 00 QOJ oo ~~ oo __ PP PP m^p 1 .-.r .... ~. ~~ 1 U 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 t _ 10000 0000 r 0000 1 0000 1 0000 r ONmO 1 0000 0000 r 0000 10000 000 00 00 O O 00 000 00 O O 1 0 1 O O O O O O O ~ e 1 O r r 00 ~~ 00 00 ~~~ 0u0'Y 000 00 ~O•'f tO'f O O N H ~,.. ~. N ~a"s I P ^^ ^ r 1 1 I 1 1 r I r 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 0000 0000 1 0000 1 0000 1 0000 1 0000 1 0000 1 0000 1 0000 1 0000 1 2 r 00 00 O O 1 0 O 1 0 00 O r 0 1 00 000 00 O O 00 O O I O O r 00 O 1 0 O O 0 0 rl0f 0 v0'i u0'i 0 /O'I IfOf O 1 0 a 1 0 N O .O N N 1 G I m Nr~ 00^ ^ y N N N 1 O I ~ 6 i ^ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 0000 10000 1 0000 1 0000 1 0000 1 Nm 00 1 0000 1 0000 1 0000 1000000 O O 1 00 1 0 O r 0 O O O ~ m~ 00 O 1 0 O I O O 1 0 O I ~e O 1 0 O O O ~¢ 1 0 0 1 0 O ~ O 0 ~ 0 0 O O u'f O ~ O N 1~ .-. 1 6 1 n I O N I N 1 Ne N I N N 1 P I .•+^ I N 1 !- 1 P 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 t I 1 1 0000 000 0000 1 0000 r 0000 mOOm 0000 1 0000 1 0000 10000 ~ 000 1 0 O 1 0 O - - ~ J¢ I O r P OVf 1 0 0 1 0 0 .O 0 1 1 .p 1 ^ N 1 .VN.. 1 P 1 ^ Z r ~ 1 ty r 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 I 6 P 1 L C 1 1 1 1 I t 1 1 1 r 1 1 W m ~+ 1 1 1 1 I 1 ~- O^ r 1 1 1 1 r 1 1 I 1 1 1 0000 0000 1 0000 0000 0000 r 0000 0000 1 0000 1 0000 1 0000 Vs d 6 1 W 1 T Z^ ~ O -~ 6 ~- .~ v i O ~ 1 P 1 Z 0 C 1 0 1 ~ I O ~^ r C 1 I 1 1 1 1 I r 6 1 V ~i I 1 1 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 W Vs 1 1 r r I 1 1 1 1 r 1 ~ 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 _ V 1 0000 1 Oo00 10000 1 0000 0000 1 0000 0000 1 0000 1 0000 I Oo00 e O O O O ~•• 1 ~ P ~ ~ P I ^ ^ 1 P I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 t o Ioooo 0000 Iooo o- 000 000 Ioooo 0000 Ioooo o°o0 1 0000 00 1 0000 ~ °oO°o°o °0000 ~°o 0o 10000 0 00 00 ±o~p¢rt 0000 1 0000 r O 00 1 0000 1 ~ 00 0000 1 O 00 1 0000 O 00 1 0000 ~ 0000 O O 1 0000 00 t 0000 1 0 OP 1 00000 0~ 1 ~00d .-~O •--r ~ NN f7 JuN-10 NN ^./Oi~ NN Oe P e -r ~. O f7e ee I 1 I r 1 r 1 1 ~t~W I Nt7 NN NN 1 1 1 1 t 0 ¢ 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 r I 1 1 4 1 1 I 1 I 1 I r 1 1 1 ~_~~_~____~~~_~_~~~~~_~_~~~_~_~~~~_~~_~_~~~~~_+_~~_~~_+_~_~~~_~_~~_~~_~-0000 ~ 000 ..n 1 0000 0000 1 0000 0000 r 0000 r 0000 0000 1 0000 ~» 1 0 O i 0 O OZ - ~. }D ~ ~ N N CWCO 00 0000 0000 10000 0000 0000 0000 000 0000 0000 0000 10000 1 0 00 10000 00 10000 10 O 0000 10 00 O 00 r W 1 0000 1 0000 I O 00 ~ 1 000 u r O 00 10000 I O 00 r 0000 I O 00 0000 ~I OOPP 1 0000000 1 0 0000 1 000000 t 0 0000 1 00000001 O 0P00 ~ 00000 1 000 I000001 f~~fN eOPP 1 000 I rtf00 1 O/~0^NO 1 O NO 1 O 0001 00 r 000000 r ON 1 O_ 001 ~ EV^i N ~--• rf .p Y~rANN I NNNN 1 ^^ NN N 1 ^PNN 1 .-.^NN 1 l~t•t--•I~C~N r ~-fe ae NN1 oN 1 Nf7oN ~ N ON 1 eNNOO; 00 1 NOO; OO 1 00; O^ O~. O W32~•-GG 1 W 3Z ~.'~p r W32r•-OG 1 W32~GG ~ W3Z~OG 1 W3Z HOC ~ W3Z^GC 1 W3Z~CG 1 W3Z•-OG 1 W3Z•-001 \006V 1 \006V 1 •\0060 1 •\00¢W 1 00601 00601 OOGV I OOGV 1 0060 1 00601 d¢U^WW 1 d¢ 1 d¢U^WW 1 d¢U r dCUr•-WW 1 d¢U^WW 1 d¢UI-WW 1 d¢Ur--WW I d¢U^WW 1 dCV^W W~ •- 1 I UAW W W _ _^~~~~_ _~~~~__ ~ v ~ n C O ..". 1 J 1~ .~i V .O U .-. 1 s .n J + 1 2Y I D 1 0 Y 0 d ~ Z ' 0017 •2 1 r- O ~ t9 --• r? ^aGW 1 ~--06W 1 6 1 G BUG 1 6 1 O 1 6Z.0 •--• ^Z ~ mC.G~ 1 ~u.GN^2 I mCC~¢W 1 Z~ O]¢~mW I OV_ •~-• 1 Om U m^21 O ~~ ¢^m LZ 1 O -O•d=O I O N•O= LO 1 .... - mu 1 •U~PZOI ~_ ¢ 1 ¢ ~SO 1 ¢ N'm ~ C.... z01 ~ d~ mW W 16 a---rP^ 1 6 a¢ r 6 -~-•^P~-1 d V'a¢ 19 Nar~~-1 ~ sWU J NPOr-1 ~ N ¢ i ON~WNVI C ~Z ~ WN ^ ~O 1 O •e 1 O ~+ 1~ •¢NU 1 N •--• Y t 6 •mU 1 6 •--• Y ~ J m i uW ¢ •¢ 1 •Y 1 ^^ ~ 1 ¢ 1 ZWO r^ •~ 1 1 LW?U 1 I r--^ •~ 1 1 LW ~U 1 1 ^^ •~ ~ J 1 K 1 K^ .01 t7d r C¢O K^OK 1 O ¢O^ 1 ¢¢O; 1 O ¢O•--r r SO¢¢O¢ 1 SO ¢¢O O ¢O¢I r NJ 1 ~m ..L 1 Ym ••• ^ >-m0~ 1 7m Z••^ 1 7m~r0 J 1 ~G ... 1 ym..-.~ m ... 0 r-- .. r I WOE-GS^ 1^OT`-SNP r~-~O W Iu0•-^S 1 VO^^WO 1 r--r-S Vf1 OOr--WG iZO^^SN~ SOr-^W ~IaO^^SVfr e W 01 p 1 ~y.1~ '- ~2^2 r r- 1 Y 2 .^21 •U m0 12 ZZ•--21 ^ .U t7~ r O 22~-Z 1 O ~Vl7Y 1 •--r Z2^OZI 2r N-+^a,•JO r .--. OO GW 1 e••+•--1Nm01 t7000Z r ON•-+^U' 01 OO.OO CZ 1 0^-.VO 1 m OCW 1 oN~-•~•t~ P 61 .mL-rv....~01}.p.. ..Z V17.p ..¢^W 10~.. ..WW1 p~..¢..r .. ..WV1 ..C~-. ^ .. ..+ r ¢OwU1 ^ N C¢1 WOWd 1 J~OJ W 1 U.O ¢r-¢¢ 1 0 ¢ i ur~CCO r ur~C^CC ~r ~ W.U¢oWW ~ OdCC~¢~ ~ +. Jai 1 Z 1 L^t~m mU r O-+a¢i •-JK r O^W/1m0 r OW ~J OG~ O ~/f O]O 1 Oar r-J¢ 1 VO ~~mU I WOt~^J¢' O P m N r~ I N P m ~ ~ N P O vN n 1 ~ 4 •~ ~ _ .O N O ~. ~ .--rr~ n .-. ~ 1 O .O ~- O _ r O ~O ~- 1 O.D 1 O r/'r.0 ^ 2 j .-n ¢ U .~-r V .O 1 ^N ^ .0 1 U m U m ^ O 1 K W _W W W I W ` r^ I` ~ ^ 1~ ^ ^ ^ r 1 ..66.~1~ •-^6.~r ~.. ..26....1... 26....r 7.. ..+¢ 1~.. .. ^d~l ~.. .. Z~h....r~.. ..2d....1 ~.. .. Z~~....1 ~.. ..+G .~ r~u pN^ IOtF,IG•O^ OU OO r--• 10 VOO^ IOU 00 ^~10¢~G O^ 1¢pU 00 ¢m 1~rV00^ r0¢V pOW 1~vOOr-V + 1 1 ~-. Vl 1 K W~ r ¢^ U Vf 1 C ~^ /t 1 Q^ ^ V Vf 1 an 1 ^ ~--. 1 .-. ~ 1 1 ~ ~ r S- 0 I I r I _ _ I . I I I _r I I r I x 0 0 0 0 r 0 000 0 O O P P O O Ne o• r O N O N x 0 0 0 0 O O ~~ I O O O O I O o C 0 O O O O O O O O O O ~~en 00 O r QOJ ~ NCJ mW ee N e ^~ _NN O<">t'1 '..~ NN O J ~ = I I 07 O I N~ I V r I I I I 1 r I I I I r I I O O O O I O O O O I O P~ O O o o N m 0 0 I O O O O I O O e`e 1 0 0 0 0 I O O O O O OO ENO 10 0 O O 0 r O r 0 0 0 0 e 0 O O O I O I ~vOY ~N ^~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ .iY rfs O O I P ~ NN r ^ mom" lOi I P 1 P 1 I I 1 r I I ~ r I 1 I r 1 1 I 1 0 0 0 0 I O O O O I P•--•O O I O O O O m O O m I O O O O I O O N N I O O O 00 X 0 0 000 ~ Z r O O r 0 O r O I P l O O O O I O O O O I O O P r O 1 0 N _ ~ ~ y ~ O O I 6 ~ r '-r ~.. e N 1 N ~ ~n ..-. r P 1 ~ O 1 r J I .--r I 1 I J r I I I I I I 1 I I I G I 1 I I I I I I I I r I I I I I r I I I I I 000 I 0000 •--x00••+ I 0000 1 0000 I 0000 I 0000 ; 0000 I 0000 I O 0 I O P P I O O x P 1 - ~ v y7 I N N I m m N N I a 1 I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I 1 I I O O O O O O O O x 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 O O O O I O O O O I O O ~~ I O O O O 1 0 0 0 0 I J~ P N 0 O x G_ I x O I I d l N Z P~ r l~ ~ x W I I I I x I x I I I I I I I I I I v C .--• I V I I I 1 1 1 I I I I I O^ 1 I I 1 I I t I I O O O O O O O O I O O O O x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 O e~ N x 0 0 0 0 x 0 0 0 0 /~ LG ~ W t m~~ Z ~... ~ O-• ' I P I .p C ~~~ ~ ANN ~ ~ P I ~ c x 0 1 P I C ~• ~ d 1 ~i I I 1 r 1 y N9 I r I x I I I I 1 t I ~ Z ~'+ I I I I I I r r v I O O O O O O O O I O O O O x 0 0 0 0 x 0 0 0 0 I O O m m I O N O N I O O O O O O O O P i u'i m m P I P ~ N ^ .--x .... P ~ ~ I I 1 I 1 t I I I I I I 1 ___ I J I O O O O 0 0 0 O I O O O O x 0 0 0 0 x 0 0 O O O O m e rt O o O O ~ O O o 0 ~ O o O o GO ` W r 0 0 0 0 I O O x 0 0 0 0 I O O O I O O O O m O O o O I O O O O I O O O O oC I NIIf~N O~/Y ulN~a I N ON ~OuO-r0 N t 000 ~~~ 1 .--~ N N N N u"r N N N I I 1 r I x I x x I p1~W I NO I O d l I 1 r I r I I I 6 1 r r r r x I I O O O O O O O O I O O O O 1 0 0 0 0 x 0 0 0 0 I O_ O N N x 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O >c7 Ou'Y U"i I 00 02 I 00-~-~+ r O~ O I >p ^NP•N O C W ~ O 00 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I O O O O 0 0 0 0 O O ~ O O O O O ~ O O O O O 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 O T G X 0 0 0 0 I O O O 1 0 0 0 0 I O O O 1 0 0 0 0 O O O 1 0 0 0 0 I O O O_O v I O O O O ~ O X000 I 000 I Vf00~00 I ONOO x 00000 I ulONPO• I u'IoOVl00 x u"r~00 r 000000 I ~ ZV~i .--.N NO I NNNN I NN~PNN I NNNN I us ~x/9NN ~ NOC7PP I NNNN I NNONO I t•')~">NN r O x O I OO x 00 ~ PN r O W32~00 I W32r-GO I W32~-OG I W3Z~OG r W32~C0 I W3Z X001 W3_2~-00 I W32r--•OG ~ W32r-OC I oo¢y I •~oocy r oocy x •~oocu x - oo¢y . oo¢u I oo¢y I oocy I oocu x I dK V~-WW I dCCVI---WW I dL'U'-•WW I LCVr--•WW r Ld'Ur-WW I dKV~WW I dCV~WW 16KV'-WW ~ G.CUI-~WW I j W I O .~+ C -• ~ 0 O NN T .O x 0 .OW Y r .m0 N I r J W 1 0 > Y I G I G'-x p ~~ U I 1 6 I- O W x 0 I- S • d ~ Z ~-~- _ X I O 6 I K CL~ WK I •~ 16vOiN~ •~ ~ W~O"+O•G 1 C~P~ G x 0 UCCC m .o Om CV NC I m -•--• I >Z.Om~-.Z x ZNJ~•S ~ Z •--•Z ~ ~ ~ y~ OW I W NONV I J ~ ~ •--•ZO I G ~OZZN I LO I N S ZO I WLO I r dJ ~ Q -~ > ~•OK •OY I G Nd V ~ > .--.Nmr--• ~ ODW I/1C I Cm r~.O r- I W WOPf- 1 •-...per I C ••-•Z .--xN 1 0 r L LW V I G =~ x C •ODV I Sd~•--•NO I SKI r ~dr--v •/~V r OLr~t O I ~J t LZ WO I I SW> x 6 1 W~ x r x/'+Cm I x ~ •p r L -r Z I OC I x K •O r x 0 OC x m y Sm I WO O 1 SO-~S -+ KK OC x YO Od' 100 ~ r Cm •~O~ I X00 ~p~ ~ x I JmVf .OV J O r VmOQ~ yWOW> r .J¢..0 ..~ •IIf ..C I ~ .. .. .. 16000¢W I OO~W O S r NO OS r 0~--~5/I r OOr-N~ I ZOZZ~N I ¢f 0~-OZaA I Or- •SV~ r e L O~ D x 0 •Ot7 1 0 a7Y i OOyV x W l 06 x 2 ZZ'-2 I S I Z 2 1 1 Z I 2J~-Z I Y r pt:0~2 x Z I x Zl~00 ~O I ZNO~OW 12e CCCZ I 'a NZ I OOr-xr VU 1 ~~+O~WO I P~r2V ~ Z.Or WZV I e.. .•ZU I J ... 61 I KN•• •. d•'••r I CJ••Cr--rW I O~••LC61 O--•r ..LN6 r N.. •. ~•• ••~- ~"~-• _ N OC x ~CLCC I OD CCrCC x OmopCd r--¢ x Oc o~Wd ~pZ ~ V^CCOWW ~ UP~OW•--. ~ KOWW r KOWW r ONCLOWW I r-6m I >~.W VfmV I W¢Nm I ¢] ~ O JC I OWf-J3 I LOWS--Jd I YOWr-J~ I LOL~~-J¢ I I x j'-• W _ ~ I m u0i ~ ~ m u0'i t~ .~ ~ ~ N .--• N ^ ~ .p .--. .O .p .--. e P ~ p _ e^~- r 0 ~- I Orel-- i O^ _ ~ O~ t 0^^ I Oy ^. _ I O .N-~ K r---I O We ¢WN W C~ J W d`N W CC~N W ~ N W W_N W Lie ~ der rW- ¢¢ ~ ~ C O I r ~ .. .. , 6 -... i ~ .. .. Z 6 ~ I ~ .. .. ~ 6 - I ~ .. .. Z 6 ~... I ~ .. .. ~ 6 ~ i ~ .. .. < C v I ~ .. .. 6 G.... r ~ .. .. C C I ~ .. . p ~O I Off: 00~- I OUOOr~ x wry-00~ r ~`r']Or~ I ZOy OUr--• I OVG6r I Od~OQ~ r OyO Grvx OV06r-V i r ~+ ~ r K ~- .... ~ i N x N r ~- vl I K F- ••-• Vl N I r ~. r K ~ .... N N x K F- •-+ ~/~ N r S -~ s 0 __~__ __ _ (vN __~ r 2 W~ m r r~0 1 6 0 J r ~ a r /> ~ 6 L r I m O r N P ~ N O ~ r O r P r d m P O r P I O ~~ P ~ P r en __rt 0~__ NOO~ ±2` I N I Qr\<N r O I P l I P 1 1 m r _ r V r P r I O I P r m r N r '+ N ~ 6 I ~_~~~_~~ ~C~ i m ~ P v~ m 1 C I m _ _ _ _ r 6 1 r W r P ~ u7 ~ m r N r ~+N __ ._t mOU'Y P'a0~ r~00m m a O m N O r Q r I P<~+N O 1 1 .O P u7 .~-~ r N i P r r N Z .Z' G CC P I r P r N N P I .n u o^ .~ ¢ ~ N . . az E '~ --'ovemo~ t O T m ~ O-~ i P i o mN0 ~ L Q O r-p _ ' r r rA r NPR W~ ~ N r Z ~ C P N N ~ O r P r c C~ _' r C r N N r a r N = rp P __ __ _ ~OmaO~ ~ O N P N P I OP ~~ P I ~ Oa~tP N.OPm _~~.__ _'~00~0 ~_ r J r O_ I O n <`l t.7 O r I O ~ --~_ r O~cC i m r vPU'1 W O N 2~ r r O P v ~-+ ~ O r I O C r N l N r 6 _~~_~`U~NOa -_ Y N _N m.O I ~ r7 ~J m O 2 m I P m a r > O C = O a W ~ --. ~ d O > O K N O O r O r m l v 0 ~ T N e ~-+O X00 N _-__ __ _ 3S2c-f~ 1 a\ O O Z r C V'-'r I a a 1 ~Z I Q r r O S Q r Q i ~ i ` s °m a~ i o i o ¢ I v y J i i o . _ ~ o r w ~ ~~ o o L r = i i ° i o. a rn . i ¢ r r u r¢ \ N K I Q N J j = I O O » ENCLOSURE 3 Roanoke County Secondary System Construction Budget Fiscal Year 1995-96 County Wide Incidental B~daet Items Allocation Rural Additions $160,920 Pipe Installation- Private Entrances $70,000 Subdivision Plan Review $5,000 Pavement Striping $20,000 $255,920 Regular Numbered Projects Allocation 0613-080-226,0501 5350,000 Fund Construction 0615-080-230,0501 $40,000 Fund Deficit 1658-080-223,0501 $30,000 Fund Construction 1658-080-223,6667 $90,000 Fund Construction 0668-080-229,0501 5750,000 Fund Construction 0636-080-282,0501 $190,000 Fund Construction 0633-080-237,0501 $152,000 Fund Construction 0720-080-281,0501 $80,000 Fund Construction 0601-080-233,0501 $900,000 Fund R/VV & Construction 0601-080-233,8677 $100,000 Fund PE & Construction 1835-080-288,0501 $50,000 Fund Construction 1835-080-288,8675 540,000 Fund Construction 1861-080-289,0501 530,000 Fund Construction 1861-080-289,6676 $38,850 Fund Construction 0628-080-232,0501 $18,214 Fund R/VV 0670-080-284,M501 520,000 Fund PE & R/VV 1867-080-295,0501 $20,000 Fund PE 1867-080-295,6678 $25,000 Fund PE $2,924,064 Unpaved Road Projects Allocation 0669-080-P83,N501 $38,427 ---------------------- $38,427. s_I Total Allocation $3,218,411 .~ T~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 27, 1995 ORDINANCE 62795-7 VACATING AND CLOSING AN UNIMPROVED PORTION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY KNOWN AS OCALA DRIVE IN THE SUN VALLEY SUBDIVISION WHEREAS, Glenn J. and Mary Ann Hammerand and Robert A. and Frances E. Vessey, the petitioners, are the owners of two parcels of land, more particularly described as Lot 13, Block 8, Section 2 and Lot 8, Block 2, Section 2, of Sun Valley Subdivision, as shown on that certain plat of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Plat Book 4, Page 63; and, WHEREAS, the petitioners have requested that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, vacate and close Ocala Drive, which is an unimproved right-of-way, measuring fifty feet (50') in width and approximately one hundred thirty feet (130') in length, lying between the above-referenced lots as shown on said plat; and, WHEREAS, §15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by §15.1-431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and the first reading of this ordinance was held on June 13, 1995; and the public hearing and second reading of this ordinance was held on June 27, 1995. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1 E 1. That an unimproved portion of right-of-way, situate in the Hollins Magisterial District and known as Ocala Drive, being approximately 50' x 130', as shown on the plat of Sun Valley Subdivision, recorded in Plat Book 4, Page 63, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, subject to the following conditions: a. That all costs and expenses associated herewith, including but not limited to, publication costs, survey costs and recordation of documents, shall be the responsibility of the petitioners; and, b. That a public utility easement, fifteen feet (15') in width, is hereby reserved and retained along the western subdivision boundary in order to connect the existing public utility easements on each side of Ocala Drive. c. That the right to provide maintenance to the existing public utility facilities located within the vacated area is reserved and retained unto C & P Telephone Company of Virginia, its successors or assigns, in accordance with §15.1-483 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. d. That the vacated area of land shall be added and combined, by deed or by plat, to the adjoining properties owned by the petitioners and shall be in compliance with the Roanoke County Subdivision Ordinance, and other applicable laws and regulations. 2. That the Department of Engineering and Inspections shall record a certified copy of this ordinance with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, and the recordation costs shall be payable by the petitioners. 3. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in 2 { conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J . Ho].fton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 3 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER 1°"1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 27, 1995 AGENDA ITEM• Approval to vacate an unimproved dedicated right-of-way referred to as Ocala Drive, recorded in Plat Book 4, Page 63, Sun Valley Subdivision and located in the Hollins Magisterial District. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Staff is recommending that the unimproved right-of-way be vacated on the condition that a 15 ft. P.U.E. is retained along the westerly property line and C & P Telephone requests the right to maintain its existing public utility facilities located within the vacated area in accordance with Section 15.1-483. BACKGROUND The petitioners, Glen J. and Mary Ann Hammerand and Robert A. and Frances E. Vessey, are the owners of two parcels separated by Ocala Drive (unimproved) which parcels are more particularly described as Lot 13, Block 8, Section 2 and Lot 8, Block 2, Section 2 of Sun Valley Subdivision. The petitioners desire to vacate Ocala Drive (unimproved) which is 50 feet in width and approximately 130 ft. in length shown on the plat of Sun Valley Subdivision in Plat book 4, Page 63 (refer to attached map). The petitioners desire to use this portion of the aforementioned road for improvements to their property and intend to combine same with said property. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION County staff received no objections to the vacation but were requested the following: ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS a) Appalachian Power Company requested that a 15 ft. P.U.E. be retained along the western subdivision boundary in order to connect to the existing P.U.E. which presently exist on both sides of the right-of-way. b) C & P Telephone requests the right to maintain its existing public utility facilities located within the vacated area in accordance with Section 15.1.483. In discussion with the County Attorney both requests can be addressed in the vacation ordinance. Therefore, Roanoke County is requesting that the described right-of-way be vacated in accordance with Chapter 11, Title 15.1-482(b), Code of Virginia 2950, as amended, by the adoption of the attached ordinance. A public hearing and second reading is scheduled for June 27, 1995; a first reading of the proposed Ordinance was held on June 13, 1995; STAFF RECOMMENDATION County staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt the proposed Ordinance to vacate the referenced right-of-way and instruct the County Attorney in preparation of the Ordinance to insert the following conditions: a) A 15 ft . P . U. E . is retained along the western subdivision boundary in order to connect the existing P.U.E. b) C & P Telephone requests the right to maintain its existing public utility facilities located within the vacated area in accordance with Section 15.1.483. ITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ~_~ Arnold Covey, Direct r Elmer C. H dge of Engineering & In pections County Administrator --------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred Kohinke To Minnix Nickens -' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 27, 1995 ORDINANCE VACATING AND CLOSING. AN UNIMPROVED PORTION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY KNOWN AS OCALA DRIVE IN THE SUN VALLEY SUBDIVISION WHEREAS, Glenn J. and Mary Ann Hammerand and Robert A. and Frances E. Vessey, the petitioners, are the owners of two parcels of land, more particularly described as Lot 13, Block 8, Section 2 and Lot 8, Block 2, Section 2, of Sun Valley Subdivision, as shown on that certain plat of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Plat Book 4, Page 63; and, WHEREAS, the petitioners have requested that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, vacate and close Ocala Drive, which is an unimproved right-of-way, measuring fifty feet (50') in width and approximately one hundred thirty feet (130') in length, lying between the above-referenced lots as shown on said plat; and, WHEREAS, §15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by §15.1-431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and the first reading of this ordinance was held on June 13, 1995; and the public hearing and second reading of this ordinance was held on June 27, 1995. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That an unimproved portion of right-of-way, situate in the Hollins Magisterial District and known as Ocala Drive, being '~ approximately 50' x 130', as shown on the plat of Sun Valley Subdivision, recorded in Plat Book 4,-Page 63, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, subject to the following conditions: a. That all costs and expenses associated herewith, including but not limited to, publication costs, survey costs and recordation of documents, shall be the responsibility of the petitioners; and, b. That a public utility easement, fifteen feet (15') in width, is hereby reserved and retained along the western subdivision boundary in order to connect the existing public utility easements on each side of Ocala Drive. c. That the right to provide maintenance to the existing public utility facilities located within the vacated area is reserved and retained unto C & P Telephone Company of Virginia, its successors or assigns, in accordance with §15.1-483 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. d. That the vacated area of land shall be added and combined, by deed or by plat, to the adjoining properties owned by the petitioners and shall be in compliance with the Roanoke County Subdivision Ordinance, and other applicable laws and regulations. 2. That the Department of Engineering and Inspections shall record a certified copy of this ordinance with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, and the recordation costs shall be payable by the petitioners. 3. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. i t ~" '" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JUNE 27, 1995 ORDINANCE 62795-8 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A .84 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 5407 PETERS CREEK ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 26.20-5-7) IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF SUSAN CAROL ROLFE AND MARK REINHARDT WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on May 23, 1995, and the second reading and public hearing were held June 27, 1995; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on June 6, 1995; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing .84 acre, as described herein, and located at 5407 Peters Creek Road, (Tax Map Number 26.20-5-7) in the Hollins Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of C-1, Office District, to the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Susan Carol Rolfe and Mark Reinhardt. 3. That the owner has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: The following uses will not be conducted on the property: 1 General and family restaurants; hospital; auto repair; funeral home. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at an old iron pin at the intersection of the south side of Peters Creek Road with the east side of Woodhaven Road, said point being corner to the property of Montague- Betts Company, Inc.; thence leaving said point of beginning and following the southerly side of Peters Creek Road and property herein described, N. 39 deg. 57' 00" E. 114.53 feet to point number 1A; thence with a new line through the property of Montague-Betts Company, Inc., S. 56 deg. 44' 17" E. 160.21 feet to point 4A on the line of the Mark Steven Reinhardt property; thence with the Reinhardt property and the property herein described, S. 33 deg. 47' 26" W. 29.68 feet to point number 5; thence continuing between the Reinhardt property and the property herein described, S. 15 deg. 00' 00" W. 113.00 feet to point number 6 on the line of property of The Branch Group, Inc.; then with The Branch Group, Inc. and the property herein described, S. 61 deg. 56' 00" W. 135.00 feet to a point on the east of Woodhaven Road; thence with Woodhaven Road and the property herein described, N. 17 deg. Ol' 00" W. 81.51 feet to point number 8; thence continuing with Woodhaven Road and the property herein described, N. 09 deg. 30' 00" W. 84.96 feet to point number 9; thence continuing with Woodhaven Road, N. 07 deg. 34' 00" W. 35.98 feet to the Point of Beginning, and being designated Parcel B and containing .84 acre and being shown on proposed subdivision for Montague-Betts Company, Inc. of a 1.32 acre tract and prepared by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers, Surveyors and Planners, dated October 27, 1994. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix 2 NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: renda J. olton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney r O / ~ _ 1 V q ~' ` Ems. {mot: F`d:.. r C`'~~i>;"c. ~ ~711I11 ~'c-~,F,eoa~ !.t ~ o,, r p ~ ,( s,,~ , ~ i i2 6 ~ fC V7 ~~ /OUO.;Y fNN Q ~--~-~ .~ ~~-\ / `~ i,~~~•/~ EDS. t \ / ~~~y+++''~~~---ryyy~ ~d~~j+NC ^IUR ZZ{ ~Ju GC6'~~c ~ - ~~- / ~ Y 1" i _ _ ~ T~ NORiN 3Q ~~ 29 a, ~ _ rJ ' ' ~i ~ w ~ ,~ ~~A 2p • S d 1~ ` ~. ~y / @ ~~'r t ~+. ~. ~~~ 19 0 ~ . i ~ ~~~ 9 ~` ~f~4 ~ ~~3° V~' O4. R~A~°~` ~.+~• ~~^• i ~~ \ V o ''SO, \ L_~ - ~~e ~ 9 ` a pf f r• ~6=0 3 ~~'Z k 1,~.M CpUntV C1~yot0 Pete ~npke R~~c'<eCt~.k City pad p~tK+ G'1TY o~ Ro~,~oK~ ~' DEPARZi`~~J'I' OF pLp,'VVrI; ; SUSAN ROLFE E MARK RE 1 NNARDT r y - AND ZONING C-1 TO c-2 .~ ~~~ ~ TAX a 26.20-5-7 Y a~ ~QO ~ / ' ~ 't't~ 2 ~r f 0 rriY ~~ \~ / ~. ~~. :° r / ~ a~', 9 '' ~ 8 / ,/ ' ry a ~~ J `, /- .+ 1 PETITIONER: SUSAN CAROL ROLFE & MARK REINI-iAItDT CASE NUMBER: 20-6/95 Planning Commission Hearing Date: June 6, 1995 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: June 27, 1995 ~~~ A. REQUEST Petition of Susan Carol Rolfe & Mark Reinhardt to rezone .84 acre from C-1 to C-2 to operate a karate and fitness studio, located in the former DMV building at 5407 Peters Creek Road, Hollins Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION Ms. Rolfe responded to questions from the Commission as follows: the karate studio will be based on memberships; hours of operation will vary--after school from 3 to 6 p.m., adult classes in the evening from 6 to 9 p.m. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS The following uses will not be conducted on the property: general and family restaurants; hospital; auto repair; funeral home. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Ross moved to recommend approval of the petition with proffered conditions. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Thomason, Hooker, Witt, Ross, Robinson NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report _ Other Terrance Ha ngton, Sec tary Roanoke C unty Plann' g Commission ~~ STAFF REPORT PETfiIONER: SUSAN ROUE & MARK REINHARDT PREPARED BY: TIM BEARD CASE NUMBER: 20-6/95 DATE: JUNE 6, 1995 PART I A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY B. DESCRIPTION Petition of Susan Carol Rolfe & Mark Reinhardt to rezone .84 acre from C-1 to C-2 to operate a karate and fitness studio, located in the former DMV building at 5407 Peters Creek Road, Hollins Magisterial District. The actual property owner, Montague Betts Co., is subdividing the tract 10 feet northeast of the existing building leaving approximately 0.48 acre of paved parking to be shared among neighboring businesses to the east and south. The petitioner intends to utilize training, observation, activity and homework areas for students in addition to offices within the 5,100 square foot building. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Personal improvement services are permitted by right in C-2. No specific use and design standards apply under Article IV, Section 30-80. Due to the fully developed nature of the site, the only appreciable change outside the building would involve new signage. A commercial entrance permit will be required by VDOT. ~~ 2 PART II A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDffIONS Location -The subject parcel occupies the southeast quadrant of the Peters Creek Road/Wood Haven Road intersection. The site is in the Peters Creek Community Planning Area and urban services are available. TopographyNegetation -The property is flat excluding a portion of the south border which slopes sharply down to vacant C-1 property. The parcel is developed with the existing building and parking. Surrounding Neighborhood -The subject tract is zoned C-1. East of the proposed use are offices and associated parking. To the south lies a vacant C-1 zoned lot. North across Peters Creek Road stands a convenience store (C-2) and a shipping facility (I-1 conditional). West of the site in the City of Roanoke a military recruiting center is found. B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Layout/Architecture -The applicants propose to utilize the 5,100+ square foot building without changing the footprint. The structure exhibits a brick and stone exterior and is one story in height. Parking and traffic aisles surround the .building. Aside from grass borders at the rights-of-way, landscaping is limited to scrub growth on the southeast boundary and a dense row of pines along the south property line, along with shrubbery adjacent to the building walls. Access~T'raffic Generation/Circulation -The applicants propose to utilize existing 30 foot entrances, one each from Wood Haven and Peters Creek roads. Well-defined two-way traffic is provided for throughout the site (excluding the one-way drive to the south and east of the building which would serve no purpose for the proposed use). The site will have 36 parking spaces (after the property is subdivided) which is roughly twice the required minimum for personal improvement services--one space for 300 sq.ft. of gross floor area. Traffic generation is liberally anticipated at 200- 300 vehicle trip ends per day with peak loads expected after 6 p.m. This is significantly less than the generation rate of the previous DMV. In addition to passenger cars, school buses may make regular drop-offs of students to the facility. The 1993 ADT on Peters Creek Road was 20,000 vehicles. An average of 2.9 accidents per year have occurred within 150 feet of the Peters Creek Road/Wood Haven Road intersection since January 1992. Fire Rescue/Utilities -Travel time is within established standards for emergency vehicles (less than four minutes). Water and sewer services are currently available. 3~ C. CONFORMANCE WfTH COUNTY COMPREHENSNE PLAN The site is designated Transition by the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. This designation limits personal improvement services with moderate compatibility. The proposal complies with policy TR-7 (coordinate vehicular movement among adjacent sites-- providing shared access and parking agreements where possible), and to a degree with Policy TR-2 (encourage new retail to develop in planned groups of independent buildings) considering the reuse of this independent structure. D. CONFORMANCE WffH COUNTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD The proposal complies with the zoning ordinance and with some possible modifications, its accompanying standards. Site and building plans will be reviewed for any proposed changes. PART III STAFF CONCLUSIONS ~ - The petitioners' proposal would provide a service not currently available in this portion of the County and achieves infill development goals without altering the site physically. With the possible exception of a slight increase (versus an operating DMV) in evening hour traffic rates, no negative impacts are anticipated. • JUfi~-02-95 FR I 1108 FR~JM MCNTRGUE-6E"S CO. 5• PLAN" 8.. 8:.IYHk h+~~s:. 7-~`~`f''~~e~~%~1~ P, 02~,.~a t~~ ~t~~~~ ~n~f ~~tSr~~~ ~~r tho ~Ja~ve ~~~ ~a~r~~~'~~' ~.~~~ ~.qx~~~a~, px~~~~~~" ~~.ax5.~: this ~'a.~~,czt~"~s~ u~~ss ~t~.l~t ts~t ~~ea a&+~'a~~,~s~:~cS ar ~~ ~'~,k'+ar~~.~ a ~~~~ ~~t~~S~eie~t~ ~~73i~;$t;.~rt~ ~~.~ ~~.r~,~ ,n~~ee~ t.~s ~~.+~ ~t~~~ ~ ~~:~~ ~~ t.L•YMi a';'~+~~i+9'R~~~ }?~CCfs~~~x~tR~IlCJ A,~~~ixa '~;i~ ~~~~~~~~` $:~°.~EA~.!lB~YL"~TY ~I.S~SE .s~~~x~ rz ~ ~ r '' f a~` ~'A.Cw.d~ KY rv! ~Y ~'.FY aPl M.FI. ,1~ ~Z§~ , ....,....._ .. ~- n. ... ~~...... ~ \I r ' ~srqu;t~£ ~W~~, ~.t'-' . F<Y~-~•~~~c~,'J;r~::c~~~? %4;1~~ - {a~+3~ ~~~~"'~~~'$G FA};. ;7t~:fis ;~~'s~-'#~~F *~.r.ENaa.r 'r' COUNTY OF ROANOKE L DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING t Z 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 • For staff use only date ecei ed: rece~ dbv: ~ ~ -~-~- ap t n ZA d Ci / ~ ~ placa d issued: 605 date: L Case Number; ~ / /+~~ Check type of application filed (check all that apply): REZONING ^ SPECIAL USE ^VARIANCE Applicant sname: phone: ciJG a - 4g~~ Address: ~ ~ d rP //'~~'C Ac/e.s ,~o ci~ .t/ t.J d'~~ / P~°~s C~ec,E'P4/Zip Code: ~ a a,cv ,L'a j~i4 a 40/ 9 ~ ~ D ~ ~' l .~ ~ Q ,~ a .~ l/ Owner's name: ~vn, ~2~ ccc _ ,Ga-7`~r~s ~d.~.~ ~.~- y Phone:~'d¢r ~d0 ~ D Address: ~' D' a0X ~~ 9 a 9 Zip Code:a¢~~ ' ,C .c~,CJ6 a.~. ,~ Location of property: ~a ~ ~ C/ d Tax Map Number: ~ '' ~ _-. t; ~~ . .z e ~ e is ~ a ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ a / q a ~ ~0 2 r Magisterial District: ~~ ~ ~~/ r; _ / . - Community Planning Area: `Jn ~n_ l c ~/ ~ ~? ~ Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: C / . o~ ~ acres Existing Land Use: ~~ ~ m P ~ ,~', ~~ !' • ~` r~;' I ~r`~ 3 ~~ sq.ft. Proposed Zoning: C dt. d ~ ..........:.................. For Staff Use On/y ~ d Proposed Land Use: ,~'a~ a f-e •c.~ cC c~~ f ~ e s s s ~ k. Use Type• Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES ~ NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. _ Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES _~~ NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. / If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO ~ ``f~ Variance of Sections} of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v '- ws v ws v Consultation 8 1 /2" x 1 1 " concept plan Application fee Application ;~<~ Metes and bounds description ~>'~> Proffers, if applicable ~;~r< Justification `~ Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners /hereby certify that l am either the owner of the properly or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner. /I n !~ J/ T Owner's Signature: /~ /,, ~ ~.~..t_/~ (.~ /,+ ~ /..~j~ F\;._ ~......~~~ ii-~ ~' SUSAN C ROLFE ~~07 Peters Creek Road old D Ni V building 7.onin~rdinance As with any form of exercise, we will encourage a healthier community. In addition to physical conditioning, students will learn valuable self-defense techniques. Karate develops not only the body, but the mind as well. Participants will develop self- discipline and self respect. They will develop coordination and learn the proper way to avoid confrontation and correct ways to fall. Developing comradery and working as a team are additional benefits. Furthermore, as with any physical activity, weight control and stress relief can more easily be achieved. Our business will promote health, safet}~, and general welfare to the surrounding community. This business will reduce congestion in the public streets. The previous occupant, D.M.V., reported nine hundred to one thousand and two Hundred transactions a day. On an average, one thousand cars used the parking lot and adjoining streets daily. Often, cars were parked in the streets and the drive-thru line would extend into the street. I{arate is an evening sport, so traffic will be minimal during business hours. Approximately, thirty cars per hour, averaging around one hundred cars nightly can be expected. 2. Conl~lrehensive Plan The building with a C-2 status will coincide with other businesses in the area. Several businesses in that area are already C-2 status. Therefore, a strip pattern of development has already occurred. The property provides two driveways accessible from two different streets, allowing for easy access. Ill aC~ No impact to property. Traffic will be considerably less than previous usage. A karate studio will provide services, not currently offered. Since participants include families, adjoining businesses will benefit from added exposure. Negligible usage for water and sewer. Studio will have less traffic than previous owner. Studio will provide after-school instructional lessons. Buses may drop-off students. Regarding packs anti recreation, studio will provide valuable skills to students. Regarding fire a-lcl rescue, ilo change. • APR. -10' 95 (THU) 16 ~ 33 P. 002 "~- ~ .' _ Mvrttague-Betts Company irRITER' S DZRECT DX.~-T, 27IIKSER (80*) 5Z2-3257 April 2D, 1995 County of Roanoke Zoning and Planning Attention: Mr. John Hartley 1619 MYtLa 1Lnad (14501.) p, O. Boz 1149 Z,pRChburg, G7- Z4506 xelepbcne: (80a) 522-320D ~4z Hu,aber: (S04) 518-0303 To Whom !t lUlay Concern: Montague-Betts Company hereby agrees to the rezoning requested by Mark Steven ~~ Reinhardt on the .84 acres of our property located at Peters Creek and Woodhaven Road, Roanoks, VA, from C-1 lofficel to C-2 (retaill. !f we can help in any way. please rontact me directly at 1804) 522-3257. Sincerely. MONTAGUE-BETTS COMPANY Edward F. Richards, CPA Chief Accountant EI=R/mms C, LSO/Z©~d iS:LI~ ~GFj-jG-did qy • y ~ ~ y .. [3 11 ~ ~ `S'py ~ v .;~„ 1 ~~ o ,~: v ~4~ ~ ~ ;, r~ \~•S• \v Z ~ p6, . U N ~p 3 .. W C' ~ n 1Y• ` y .~.' .' o o. •'~i' . ~~ i .c C7 . r nc " ~ O ~. o t 1 ~• r Q .•~ ~ ;~' ~ ~ ~, •... ;• ;• z _ . 9i v; ~, n ~~ y * ^,a ~/' ~ ...tro ~ ., ~'b .C 9'19 ~ '~ .I'!9 ----..~_.._ . ~ 71 ~ It O .t « ~ _v ~ R ........_ o, ~; I ate, m ~ o f ! ....'" ~. p a~2 ~ ! f - - ~ v a R ` ~J a1 ~r.K flt~sup ,ores ~ I I ' •..__. _. , n _~ ~ X00 ~0 t +::~..~~_. - ~. ~ .10.1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t i Oi;, I f J f ` '.-~----'` i ~ b ~ Q '~ f) ~ ~xl JQ bI ~~ ( f, ~ ~ Y ~ \ I i i ~ OQ q ~jr i i ~ z »^ a ~ i ~ I ~ ~ ~r i II 1. t ! 1 1 ..... _. ~ ._..~_. ...: ... ~ 4. gl A fl 1® ! ! 1 i i V ppT~ ~ I o ; Ib.-1 ~ O i !- I I t ii I c'~I ^1 ~~75~ I i 1 ~. 1 I~ ~l t ~g ~ ~ ~ 4 l ..~~ t ' ~ 3I3 ~ ©b~ C 1 .(. V 1 1 } 11 Oar ; ;bs;. J4Srt' i i ~I s ~~~. ~ ~ :3 Q! Y]lYM ,Ol ~- trcll- yJ'otcl •ro ~ 1 I ~ LI~F~~ w-lO-Ot'ot / xvt 1 1 i ~ ~ ~ 1,]WY Y ]U7siYZ!'C] r1 '0 riYfY1VA ~ atc. ~=B ~0 11r]IArJ T-~ .~ 1 I ZO 397d 3L+OOW 3I'1~IW b90iS9zE0L S0~0i S66T/0T/b0 ROAHOZCE COUNTY UTILITY DEPARTHSNT '~ APPLICATION FOR WATER OR SEWER SERVICE TO PP.OPOSED DEVELOPMENT Date -~ - /~- ~U Name of Applicant_~c~ s 2,L ,~.o /c~'~ Phone ~~v ~ - '~ ~ c>° Address of Applicantv'g0~ ~~~~~s l'ree,~'_ ~~. ~oa.~o~ ,//~~ ~-~ 0/ Name of Developer Phone Address of Developer Name of Design Engineer Address of Design Engineer Phone Nave of Contact Person ^('L, s ,~ /~,~. /y P Name of Proposed Development Type of D''//evelopment and /proposed number of units (Be sp/ecific) ~Q l GL r ~ .1 /' ~ 4 (~ C w .~r~~ r~ i' n a / /L ~C ~-//-~- c T'/ • d /7 4 l' ~ Lt ~ ~ p ~d C2 .~ DC ~ ~ ate/ ~° y D dr i? r n_ S ~l' ~ ~ T Location of proposed development (FURNISH COPY OF MAP Ai~TD PLPNI~~'?IC N'CfiiBER) Size of proposed development in acres: ~ Acres Give minimum and maximum elevation (Use USGS Elevations) at which the individual water/sewer service connections would be located: Minimum feet MSL. Maximum feet MSL Is this application for a development that w 11 be a part or section of a larger future development? ~ No Yes if yes, provide map of entire area if available. OVER ( ) Signature o Ap`plzcant "r ~~%, „o; . .,,, "3p ~~: 9, • .. ~ ~~ ` ~ o~ 29 s ~~ ~_. rJ' \ 'w e~ . i~l i ~{ '~I ~9l C Syr q ~~. ,. i9 ~+ ;,~. ~^y~e 9 ~ /_ ~ ~3 4 i v ~~~o v . - O ~' RoA~``` ~,~.. ep~^' n ~6T0 Co~~t~ ~ C~tya~a p~~~ e ~ ~c R~n~kec~~~k of ~~,n ~o~ G'~TY c~ Ro,~,JoKe DEPARTI~IV'P OF PLAIVN;KG SUSAN ROLFE ~ MARK REINNARDT AIVD ZONING C-1 TO c-2 TAX ~` 26.20-5-7 Y ~ oa / ~o I ~ / '~'r, 20 ~ ~ ~ lily f' ~~ \~ / ~ \ +: ~' r~ o / ~ ~ ~. / ~'~,19 \ y ~~ > >i o `w/g v /) ~• \ V . L ~ !7 I a i / ~_ o' ~' \ os O =. ~® AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JUNE 27, 1995 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A .84 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 5407 PETERS CREEK ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 26.20-5-7) IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF SUSAN CAROL ROLFE AND MARK REINHARDT WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on May 23, 1995, and the second reading and public hearing were held June 27, 1995; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on June 6, 1995; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing .84 acre, as described herein, and located at 5407 Peters Creek Road, (Tax Map Number 26.20-5-7) in the Hollins Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of C-1, Office District, to the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Susan Carol Rolfe and Mark Reinhardt. 3. That the owner has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: The following uses will not be conducted on the property: 1 ~~' General and family restaurants; hospital; auto repair; funeral home. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at an old iron pin at the intersection of the south side of Peters Creek Road with the east side of Woodhaven Road, said point being corner to the property of Montague- Betts Company, Inc.; thence leaving said point of beginning and following the southerly side of Peters Creek Road and property herein described, N. 39 deg. 57' 00" E. 114.53 feet to point number lA; thence with a new line through the property of Montague-Betts Company, Inc., S. 56 deg. 44' 17" E. 160.21 feet to point 4A on the line of the Mark Steven Reinhardt property; thence with the Reinhardt property and the property herein described, S. 33 deg. 47' 26" W. 29.68 feet to point number 5; thence continuing between the Reinhardt property and the property herein described, S. 15 deg. 00' 00" W. 113.00 feet to point number 6 on the line of property of The Branch Group, Inc.; then with The Branch Group, Inc. and the property herein described, S. 61 deg. 56' 00" W. 135.00 feet to a point on the east of Woodhaven Road; thence with Woodhaven Road and the property herein described, N. 17 deg. O1' 00" W. 81.51 feet to point number 8; thence continuing with Woodhaven Road and the property herein described, N. 09 deg. 30' 00" W. 84.96 feet to point number 9; thence continuing with Woodhaven Road, N. 07 deg. 34' 00" W. 35.98 feet to the Point of Beginning, and being designated Parcel B and containing .84 acre and being shown on proposed subdivision for Montague-Betts Company, Inc. of a 1.32 acre tract and prepared by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers, Surveyors and Planners, dated October 27, 1994. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. zoning.reinhard 2 f AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 27, 1995 ORDINANCE 62795-9 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO SHELOR INC. TO OPERATE A USED CAR LOT LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF WILLIAMSON ROAD 400 FEET NORTH OF ITS INTERSECTION WITH PLYMOUTH DRIVE (TAX PARCEL 27.18-1-5.2), HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Shelor Inc. has filed a petition to allow the operation of a used car lot located on the west side of Williamson Road 400 feet north of its intersection with Plymouth Drive in the Hollins Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on June 6, 1995; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on May 23, 1995; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on June 27, 1995. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to allow the operation of a used car lot located on the west side of Williamson Road 400 feet north of its intersection with Plymouth Drive in the Hollins Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1-456 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and hereby grants a Special Use Permit to Shelor Inc. to allow said use with the following condition: 1 (1) Vehicular access for the proposed use will be from the existing used automobile dealership at 6718 Williamson Road. Any future uses of the. property, not associated with the existing use, will require VDOT approval for an entrance permit. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: Supervisor Eddy A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Hol on, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 2 "`IRRYe~ I •~ ~~,H SAM .. I Vic, 117) eP . s sa+. i+a /, ~~-~ ti~ Fs.~~; R INGf I [,uF~~E'N }~ ` NgN(J~- 1 u AFfS~L Jt e~eoJ~ ~«. n T~ ~' ~;,,:.. ,q ": VICINITY MAP_••Z~~~~, ~ `~'"°`'~~' _ ~~* DEPARTfgNT OF PLANNING SHELOR INC. ~~ AIVD ZONING SPECIAL USE PERMIT •:• TAX MAP ~ 27.18-1-5.2 .,, '' ~ 115 ` ~~,~ ~~'~ Neap _~+Ri ' a ~~ 'J Q ~° ' -- 'r'-3 NORTH ~' PETITIONER: SHELOR INC. CASE NUMBER: 22-6/95 Planning Commission Hearing Date: June 6, 1995 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: June 27, 1995 A. REQUEST Petition of Shelor Inc. for a Special Use Permit to operate a used car lot, located on the west side of Williamson Road 400 feet north of its intersection with Plymouth Drive, Hollins Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION In response to questions from the Commission, Ron Palmieri said that some greenery will remain between the creek and the paved area. D. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS Vehicular access for the proposed use will be from the existing used automobile dealership at 6718 Williamson Road. Any future uses of the property, not associated with the existing use, will require VDOT approval for entrance permit. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Ross moved to recommend approval of the Special Use Permit with the recommended conditions. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Thomason, Hooker, Witt, Ross, Robinson NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report _ Other Terrance Ha ngton, retary Roanoke unty Pl ning Commission STAFF REPORT ., • • • PETITIONER: Shelor, Inc CASE NUMBER: 22-6/95 PART I A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY B. DESCRIPTION 7- 3 PREPARED BY: David Holladay DATE: 6/6/95 Shelor, Inc. wishes to expand their current operation at 6718 Williamson Road to include the lot under consideration on this petition. The petitioner proposes to construct a paved vehicle display area with perimeter chain link fencing. No new buildings are proposed. The concept site plan included with the application was not proffered, and no conditions have been proffered. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Used automobile dealerships are allowed in the C2 zoning district by Special Use Permit. Additional use and- design standards to be addressed during site plan review are as follows: 1. Outdoor display areas in conjunction with automobile sales shall be constructed of the same materials required for off-street parking areas as required in Public Street and Parking Design Standards and Specifications. 2. A ten-foot planting strip shall be provided adjacent to any public street right-of--way. Within this planting strip, one large deciduous, large evergreen or small deciduous tree shall be planted every thirty (30) linear feet. Such planting materials shall otherwise comply with the landscaping requirements contained in Section 30-92. 3. The storage and/or display of motor vehicles in the planting strip required above shall be prohibited. 4. Exterior display or storage of new or used automobile parts is prohibited. 5. Any vehicle which is missing major mechanical or body parts or have been substantially damaged shall be placed in a storage yard. The storage yard shall be fully screened from public view and shall be set back at least one hundred (100) feet from any adjoining residential district. Site plan review will be required prior to issuing a building permit to ensure compliance with County ordinances. .~ PART II A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CO~tDITIOl~TS ~,, ~ Location -The lot is located adjacent and to the north of 6718 Williamson Road, in the Hollins Magisterial District. Topograph /~Ve_ eg tation -The lot is level and has been cleared of trees at some time in the past. Recently some fill dirt has been deposited on the site along with some large boulders. Vegetation consists of grasses and shrubs, with trees along the creek at the western boundary. Deer Branch flows along the western boundary of the property. This stream has been studied and mapped by FEMA. The entire lot appears to lie within the 100 year floodplain. The approximate location of the floodway is shown on the enclosed site plan. The floodway lines will determine the limits for any new fill on the site. Surrounding Neighborhood -All adjoining properties are zoned C2. Surrounding land uses are as follows: South -Laundromat and Shelor, Inc. used automobile dealership West -Vacant North -Vacant East -Super Shoes, Hi Wok Chinese Restaurant B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSER DEVELOPMENT Site Layout/Architecture - As shown on the enclosed site plan, the petitioner wishes to construct a paved vehicle display area,' on a portion of the lot, with area reserved along the frontage for a required planting strip. Perimeter fencing and some lighting are proposed. No new buildings are proposed. Access -Access is shown on the site plan through the existing used automobile dealership to the south. Traffic Circulation -Traffic count on Route 11, Williamson Road, from Roanoke north city limits to Route 601 was 18,000 vehicles per day (1993). Fire Rescue/Utilities - No impact is anticipated to fire and rescue or utility service. • C. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The request conforms generally with the guidelines of the Transition land use designation of the -.~ Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. Policy TR-2 encourages new retail uses to develop in ~~' ~ planned shopping centers or in planned groupings of independent buildings. Policy TR-7 encourages coordination of vehicular and pedestrian movement among adjacent sites: provide shared access and parking agreements where possible, limit the frequency of driveway openings, and establish minimum frontage lot widths. Policy TR-8 encourages enhancement of the quality of highway frontage development, applicable in this case with respect to front yard landscaping requirements. D. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD The request is allowed through Special Use Permit in the C2 zoning district. Site plan review is required and will ensure conformance with applicable development standards. Location and limits of floodplain and floodway will affect site design. PART III STAFF CONCLUSIONS The applicant's request for a special use permit to, operate a used automobile dealership is generally consistent with the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. The site appears to have ample space to conform with all applicable use and design standards of the zoning ordinance: No negative impacts are anticipated. SUGGESTED CONDITIONS Vehicular access for the proposed use will be from the existing used automobile dealership at 6718 Williamson Road. Any future uses of the property, not associated with the existing use, will require VDOT approval for entrance permit. PREPARED BY: DAVID HOLLADAY DATE: 6/6/95 • • • COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 For staff use only date re eiv v __._ • ~ re~ve by: ~ ~ . application fee: ?CBZ dat ~S ~ /.,~ placards issued: BOS d e: ~V L 7/. Case Number: /,~ r~ ~ ' "" Check type of application filed check all that apply): ^ REZONING L~JSPECIAL USE ^VARIANCE T//c~, ~',a;;_ 1 J+-`y'~.~'=.`~ `. ) Phone: .~~2-?y~Y Applicant's name: ShELeR ~ Address: G7l S ws~~?-~~5~~' 2~, (,~aarlo/C~ V,q Zip Code: ?'.;ei9 Owner's name: BbT~ ~~t~.!F..~ Phone: ?~:=~- ~' ~9 Address: ~22o w:uT.^^~~~-~ ;z~ ,,,;y,i, Zip Code: ?`~o%? ryatio of p ope'~r~~XX ,, ~ I ~~ ~ /~`l ~~ `~C~~" ax Map Number. ~ ~ ~~ _ _ V = T ~; ~,.,~ ~ ~ Magisterial District: °,~}t/e~F ~~ ~~°t~ Community Planning Area: r. Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: ~-~ . 33~ acres Existing Land Use: sq.ft. Proposed Zoning: s'o~~lJ~ use ..................y........ For staN Use onI .. Proposed Land Use: psED ~vQ DoT Use Type: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES ~ NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO j:' ~.: ``~''`~'"~"~'•"~~ ~``"`"~`. ~ ~'•"`:'.``````""`€'``'```'``i"'• ``'"`,'•''• `:: ``` `_: ~ €•'• i ~'~ ~€'``:'':€?€s' ~i €E''' ~ ~ `:'~ ~€ ~ ~EEc `EEC ... f .............~.-- -~......................................................................................................................................... Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INC MPLETE. ws as `~ Consultation 8 1 /2" x 1 1" concept plan Application ~>~?''` Metes and bounds description Justification ' ''~`s Water and sewer application Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF ws ~' / Application fee Proffers, if applicable Adjoining property owners l hereby certify that / am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and cp~sent of the owner. -~ ~ Owner's Signature: For Stall Use Only: Case Number '"~_..yy Applicant S~{LLo,~ Sf~l~ . The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. 7~~ ~ ~ "'~L aF ~vFt~D Oar`. ~7 w~LL_ ~~d ~~' Ti~fE Lo0/G~ p F ~~ A~F~-, , Thy=zf' L dT k~SL L ~: G~~ E r~ ti~ / , F ^ Go.c~'r~'7~ ~.~ ~7'n Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. ~f LOT wTLL c~ o.~rzvGrE ~o ~? E ~D''~ ~~- ~'~ Wsrhl ~~ ~,P.4ENT ~ USc'S O f Tl~E Q~o~F~~..-r_~. ~N ~E fja ~A,) sT t,,i~-~ /r/o T D EvSG, : = FQe ~i Q o,~No/CE co w~YS ca ~R~f~-'~Nf: /~ D~~, Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. 'T~f~ FR~9~~-a^l t+i~2L ~: v~ N- ,a.~/glS~ x/~/~~J~ Q N T,S~E !;.~Q a w ~/,~N(, G?.o )~/~TS~r. TT WSL L i .• r F -~ ~ •/ T/aE ss,~.A~ uN~ t ~~ ~ ~~ J ~ifA. THE PnoG%-,~Tl~ w~LL ~/cT ~L ~~ ~~`/ '~ -r ~, S/~I~rG. 6N Qu~L=L ~~/~TGti.~, • NOTES: 1. PAVE1`FENT PER OFF STREET PARKING REOUIRE1v1ENT5. 2. PLANTING STRIP SNAU. INCLUDE ONE St•AALL DECDUOUS TREE OR ONE LARGE DECIDUOUS OR EVERGREEN TREE FOR E`+ERY 30' UNEAR F00T BORDERING RIGHT OF WAY. ~a ~ ~ a`\ :, 11 `Il '`11 '„ ,. ;, 11 ,. ", ~~ N EXIST. TRIPIc DIRE~CTtON ~ ~' __ 'R f 30' CMP _ U °~ OF FLOW .-- _~u_ "= ~-.', TOE AT 1~ Y~~ ,°' Q N ~'j o W ~ Y Y O ~~ ~WAi , I1 ,; DUSK TO DAWN UGHT ~~~ ,~ • ~~ ~' . I PROPOSED I ILLUMINATED ~ ~,r11WG 5~ SIGN 15' 10' I _~ I - , l - l -` . \ I ' r - _~ SCALE 1'-30' E N G I N E E R 3, P. C. az~ t~omuJo M.o«. Rc.sotw tlr~fw za~e. roe-a+a-aozo, ruc Tos-a~a-eea Member of the American Consulting Engineers Council CONCEPT PLAN TAX PARCEL. 27.18-1-5.2 OWNER: BETTY F®LLER TENANT: SHELOR, INC. DESIGNED DRAwN C~IECKED DATE PROJECT GS _ RNP _ APRIL 26. 1995 95043 ~\ ~ 1 1 I I I I I l ~ r ~ r ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ' y-- I J , ~ ~_ \ --- _ ~~ ~ ~RRre~s . , \. 20 ~~ -"'7N ~~Cj .S~ F 117 1 p~ ~y . ~~/a R q9 4H 0 J O V K q <?a:>_ c~ ~':, ` 'fft/, c ~ ' VICINITY MAP_ i _ z 81 ~ aar 0 r... / g d r ~' ~r+ [.L~c'~lE , o~ J~ ~e~J< ~ ~ ~~~ a~ Qy/Y'S~~~ DEPAR'TMEN'T' OF PLANNING AND ZONING / CQrv'r' i ~ y~ '('- 3 p NEOG ~ L !'1'1~6--c~~n-r~+R~ ~ a ~f\\:1 I C 1~ ~ q `~ NORTH ~ L I I ~J 7 •a irl t a ~ b I I {L- q• 3„ j~i raja a I~ i o ,... S s 7 _ 1 t9 I tan cy I} • y/ t • C I s u r • D rn• S raq $ru. ~ l ' ., Z • R ; ~~ r'O1 rsoa ~ I 8 rs.l O' ,. • ' i•. ,.. ,. «, 6 ~ ~ ~ is ' '~ ~ LI. .r~ I R,p22 \ 1 .rsoa nr ~ wn Y ~r A ~ w a ' µ, ~ ara I •,. 4 ~ ~ ral .M `f 1 r ~` ~ ~ .. 10 9 ~rre. • F 5 a p ~ /•lI , Il. ~ 1 _ I ila ~ ,623 ife '° ' Rt 1 rroa as S~./ ' ~ ~ r. ''sue E1~ N .ll 1 ,., 7^ ' 9 I ror ~ .e f4 .rs 6 Sr\\ ~ 3 . 8 .t~ , S 1 - 1 .. O a a t n.r ~ 41 ..f " i ~ r Ia ~ K ` I6 LS ,•a ~' ~ , O ~ R .l• N~ ,,a aor • ~' f r•v~ .ar w ~ / . .u . f~.o 4 1 ... •`_ ` u eta 6 ~« Ursla. ~ pf tll S ,.~ t a 1 O SHELOR INC. SPECIAL USE PERMIT TAX MAP ~ 27.18-1-5.2 T3 r AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 27, 1995 ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO SHELOR INC. TO OPERATE A USED CAR LOT LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF WILLIAMSON ROAD 400 FEET NORTH OF ITS INTERSECTION WITH PLYMOUTH DRIVE (TAX PARCEL 27.18-1-5.2), HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Shelor Inc. has filed a petition to allow the operation of a used car lot located on the west side of Williamson Road 400 feet north of its intersection with Plymouth Drive in the Hollins Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on June 6, 1995; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on May 23, 1995; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on June 27, 1995. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to allow the operation of a used car lot located on the west side of Williamson Road 400 feet north of its intersection with Plymouth Drive in the Hollins Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1-456 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and hereby grants a Special Use Permit to Shelor Inc. to allow said use with the following condition: 1 T- (1) Vehicular access for the proposed use will be from the existing used automobile dealership at 6718 Williamson Road. Any future uses of the property, not associated with the existing use, will require VDOT approval for an entrance permit. zoningshelor 2 1 ~.A• AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 27, 1995 ORDINANCE 62795-10 AMENDING AND REENACTING ORDINANCE 82592-12, THE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR ROANOKE COUNTY, BY THE ADOPTION OF CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO SAID ORDINANCE RELATING TO MANUFACTURED HOMES WHEREAS, Roanoke County adopted zoning provisions in 1986 which permitted manufactured homes throughout the County on individual lots under certain specific design requirements and established provisions for accessory manufactured homes, emergency manufactured homes and manufactured home parks and subdivisions; and WHEREAS, these provisions were proclaimed to be "innovative" by the Virginia Manufactured Housing Association and cited as a model ordinance to be considered by other jurisdictions; and WHEREAS, the legislature amended Section 15.1-486.3 of the Code of Virginia in 1990 to mandate that manufactured homes of 19 feet wide be allowed in all agricultural districts or districts where the dominant use is agricultural or forestry, and further amended this Section in 1995 by deleting the reference to 19 feet in width; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at their work sessions on April 18, 1995 and May 16, 1995, discussed various options for amending the County Zoning Ordinance to implement the changes mandated by the amendments to the Code of Virginia; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that the AG-3 and AG-1 zoning districts consist of the only districts where the dominant use is agriculture or 1 forestry; and WHEREAS, the Commission has further determined that the AR district is primarily a rural residential district based on the districts intent, character, location and distribution of lot sizes: and WHEREAS, the Commission has also determined that the character of planned residential subdivisions are such that they do not constitute areas where the dominant use is agriculture and forestry; and WHEREAS, after a public hearing on June 6, 1995, the Planning Commission recommended that the Proposed Amendments to the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance for Manufactured Homes be adopted in order to comply with the above mentioned amendments to the Code of Virginia; and WHEREAS, on August 25, 1992, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted Ordinance 82592-12 which enacted a new zoning ordinance for Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, since the adoption of the new zoning ordinance the need for the adoption of several amendments have been identified; and WHEREAS, in the interest of public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice, the Board of Supervisors hereby amends certain provisions of the Zoning Ordinance for Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law, and that the first reading of this ordinance was held on May 23, 1995, and the second reading and public hearing was held on June 27, 1995. 2 BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the Zoning Ordinance for Roanoke County, adopted on August 25, 1992, be, and hereby is amended and reenacted, as follows: PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE ROANOKE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE FOR MANUFACTURED HOMES ARTICLE I GENERAL PROVISIONS Sec. 30-23-2 Nonconforming Uses of Buildings, Structures or Land (H) Notwithstanding (A) through (G) above, a nonconforming manufactured home existing on an individual lot of record that has served as an active dwelling for at least six months may be replaced with ~ ~a~tt~tl'trmanufactured home provided: 1. The replacement home is installed on the lot within four months of the removal of the home to be replaced, and; 3 2. The replacement home is installed in approximately the same location on the lot, and is installed to comply with the setback regulations for principal structures, and; 3. The installation of the replacement home complies with the Use and Design standards for manufactured homes contained in Section 30-82-8 .............. tai-~.; a~s.`:~~°. ARTICLE II DEFINITIONS AND USE TYPES SEC. 30-28 DEFINITIONS MANUFACTURED HOME - A structure, transportable in one or more sections, which in the traveling mode is 8 body feet or more in width or 40 body feet or more in length, or, when erected on site, is 320 or more square feet, and which is built on a permanent chassis and designed to be used as a dwelling with or without a permanent foundation. A manufactured home shall contain one dwelling unit. Some manufactured homes are also referred to as mobile homes. PLANNED RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION - A developmentt~~'~ft constructed on a tract of at least five acres, 4 planned and developed as an integral residential neighborhood unit. The subdivision shall consist of five or more lots of five acres or less, each lot designed and intended for the placement of a residential dwelling. SEC. 30-29 USE TYPES; GENERALLY Sec. 30-29-2 Residential Use Types NUFA °>T .RE[~ H SAE::::::-A€s~rt le <o~<>rt~ulti se+~tlar~ I<:mar~ufactur~cl>rtQrt~aas .....A :::::...::::::::?~.::: ~J.::::::.:::::.:::::::~::::::::.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::._:: ~:::::::::::::::::::::::._:::::.::.:..:................................ ........................................................................................... MANUFACTURED HOME, ACCESSORY - A ~iae~-manufactured home that is subordinate to a single family dwelling on a single lot and meets the additional criteria contained in Section 30-82-b. 5 MANUFACTURED HOME, EMERGENCY - A 61ass-manufactured home used temporarily for the period of reconstruction or replacement of an uninhabitable dwelling lost or destroyed by fire, flood, or other act of nature, or used temporarily as housing relief to victims of a federally declared disaster in accordance with Section 30-82-8. MANUFACTURED HOME SUBDIVISION - A five acre or larger community of manufactured home dwellings with lots that are subdivided for individual ownership. MANUFACTURED HOME PARK - A five acre or larger tract of land intended to accommodate a manufactured home community of multiple spaces for lease or condominium ownership. A manufactured home park is also referred to as a 6 mobile home park. ARTICLE III -DISTRICT REGULATIONS SEC. 30-32 AG-3 AGRICULTURAL/RURAL PRESERVE DISTRICT Sec. 30-32-2 Permitted Uses (A) 2. Residential Uses Accessory Apartment Home Occupation, Type I and Type II Kennel, Private Manufactured Home, Accessory * Manufactured Home, Emergency Residential Human Care Facility Single Family Dwelling, Detached SEC. 30-33 AG-1 AGRICULTURAL/RURAL LOW DENSITY DISTRICT Sec. 30-33-2 Permitted Uses 8 (A) 2. Residential Uses Accessory Apartment Home Occupation, Type I and Type II Kennel, Private Manufactured Home, Accessory * Manufactured Home, Emergency Residential Human Care Facility Single Family Dwelling, Detached SEC. 30-34 AR AGRICULTURAL/RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Sec. 30-34-1 Purpose (A) These areas are generally characterized by very low density residential and institutional uses mixed with agricultural uses, forest land and open space outside the urban service area. These areas provide an opportunity for rural living in convenient proximity to urban services and employment. Agricultural uses should be encouraged to be maintained 9 may. Over time, however, these areas are expected to become increasingly residential in character, with residential development becoming the dominant use over agricultural and more rural type uses. The purpose of this district, consistent with the Rural Village land use category in the Comprehensive Plan, is to maintain these areas essentially in their rural state, consistent with the level of services anticipated by the County. These areas are generally suitable for low density residential development and other compatible land uses. Sec. 30-34-2 Permitted Uses (A) 1. Agricultural and Forestry Uses Agriculture Forestry Operations Stable, Private Stable, Commercial Wayside Stand 10 2. Residential Uses Accessory Apartment Home Occupation, Type I Kennel, Private * * Manufactured Home, Emergency Residential Human Care Facility Single Family Dwelling, Detached SEC. 30-36 AV VILLAGE CENTER DISTRICT Sec. 30-36-2 (A) Permitted Uses 2. Residential Uses Accessory Apartment Home Beauty/Barber Salon Home Occupation, Type I Kennels, Private * Manufactured Home, Emergency Residential Human Care Facility Single Family Dwelling, Attached Single Family Dwelling, Detached Two Family Dwelling SEC. 30-41 R-1 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Sec. 30-41-2 Permitted Uses (A) 1. Residential Uses Home Occupation, Type I * Manufactured Home, Emergency Residential Human Care Facility Single Family Dwelling, Detached (For Zero Lot Line Option - *) Single Family Dwelling, Attached SEC. 30-42 R-2 MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT 12 Sec. 30-42-2 Permitted Uses (A) 1. Residential Uses Accessory Apartment Home Occupation, Type I Kennel, Private * Manufactured Home, Emergency Residential Human Care Facility Single Family Dwelling, Attached Single Family Dwelling, Detached (For Zero Lot Line Option - *) Two Family Dwelling SEC. 30-45 R-3 MEDIUM DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Sec. 30-45-2 Permitted Uses (A) 1. Residential Uses Accessory Apartment 13 Home Occupation, Type I ..............................................:................ .............................................................. * Manufactured Home, Emergency Multi-family Dwelling Residential Human Care Facility Single Family Dwelling, Attached Single Family Dwelling, Detached (For Zero Lot Line Option - *) Townhouse Two Family Dwelling SEC. 30-46 R-4 HIGH DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Sec. 30-46-2 Permitted Uses (A) 1. Residential Uses Accessory Apartment Home Occupation, Type I * Manufactured Home, Emergency 14 Multi-family Dwelling Residential Human Care Facility Single Family Dwelling, Attached Single Family Dwelling, Detached (For Zero Lot Line Option - *) Townhouse Two Family Dwelling ARTICLE IV USE AND DESIGN STANDARDS SEC. 30-81 AGRICULTURAL AND FORESTRY USES Sec. 30-81-3 Farm Employee Housing (A) General standards: 1. #1rtAccessory Manufactured Home, shall be permitted as an accessory use to an agricultural use exclusively for a farm employee, and his/her family i the requirements contained °'°°~~~"°r° ;^ +";~ nr+~°~° SEC. 30-82 RESIDENTIAL USES ct . ~ < :>:::.c~ > > : s:> < rove >:v~a < ~:::a~~t::> ::a >. ab ;:> :: > . ~ :: >n a :::::: ; :: :::::::::::~t#e~tt>~'>~r~t.~'~.....~..~d...N~....r'r.'~~ ..................~~..~..........E~l.................. ~~fi....Cc~.......1e...hO~S..r1 ........t.c3rt..f4~' ... ~ ............................:.:.:....:::::.:.::.:::::::::::::::::::. . . ~ :::::::::::::::::::::::.I~.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:::::::.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ~~.::::.:1~?.::::::::::::::::: ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... . 16 ....................................................................................... ....................................................................................... ~h8 ~ nu ~~~~,. ~torr~~ ~xt5te~1 1C1,]Q;.;±~t~canty ~rn~r ~~ M~~~~t,»~~x :b:><>:`'t~:~1`J~t'luGfiur~'c~ h~r~~:~~:t~J~~fied:>CtSI~~>~.'::3i~br~~ ~~-'~ ;::~(fi:~h~1( se~an~~rned >: ~n<: A~t~ ~1e:::::1::>:~~::>th~ s::::Qr~1~:n ante: .:::::::::::::::::::::>::.:;;man€uf.~~~~~`e~m~ ~h~i~ ~a~te the tow ~ssern~l end v~f~eel~ remvw~.> 17 ..... ~~~ri~~~rte~It~narid an~h~re~. t~ . ~... arrni~n~~aurtd~[~~:r'~~>~artd ~~C~~t~d~t :~G~:~CC1~r~cv~ritl~ fil'~~ ~'~~i~~CsriS t~~ '~f1~ ~~ rX:~1'I~c~Crt1 ~~~~'-1d ~ :$.4~~~d ~;C1~ ..........~../..... .Y.!~R ................. ................. ................. v. v: :v:::. ~.:: ~ : :::::::::::::.:: .::::::: .:::::: •:::::::::::: :.: v:::: :.: :w:::::::. w::: .:: .:::::::::: ::::::. :::::::::::..::::::::::::::::::::::. ~:::. ~::: x:: • ::::: L.ii: ~i::{: {.ii'. iiiii :ti?ii: ii : is ii::ti•: ~,.::::: Thy ~t~tsr~.~f..~~tured:h~m~ shalt dear~i a errn~~t fr~~~l~we;.~n :.: '.:i::i::::::::::i::: ":+ii'::ii• • • •: ';iiiiii:4:; :;:jiv':LLL<!LL;iY':iiji}i";i}'.y::}i:':}::: ~' ii:;?iii::..::". '.:ii::: ~:: ::::i::i:ii:i::ii:'::i:::: ~ .:: ~. `i:::ii:; ;ii' ;:Lv;i{:': {ii:';:;:j;: "; 'Gi%j'v:: '.iX:.i}i:};:}'i:;ii:;Y; +ii:;ii:';:;:y i::' i;i:yi;' y :;i:v' {ii::f :<::::<:::::>::::~d~lrtta> af.:rt~~:~ls:~r~:::~f~a:~~ ~:>~~l :::and alf f~e~t~~~tial ~~strtc~t~::an::~r~~d~vid~ai lats: ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... . ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... :.:::~::.::~:.::.::.::.;:Th~ ~n~-~~~turs~ I~c~r~~ sl~~ll h~ ~ ~:.:.:~::.::~;rn::::.::.i::.i:.iidt~:::pii:~;.;#~e ~x><><:<»<::»::hs::::::rnanuf~~tu~~c~ lame :::s~te.:::~hsll<:::~h~va a...~tor...a ~.::~r:..~s::>:~rt~l~ssc~>:::~±n»:~):[ si~~~::;hav€r~ >::at:::I~a~t:>~:>~~b~~:>fe~t:::snd:>des:~> ne:::t~:~tQre:» :src~:::s.>~~ <.~nt :::::::: ::::::::::::. ~::.~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.::::::::.~.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::. ~:~.:::. ~::::::::: G.. ~::..:::::::::::::::: :.:::.: ................................................................................................................................................................................... iii?iii}i :i i'LLihi•;::: •.:v: :v::::: w :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: w::::::::. ~: v v. _.: _:.:::::::: ::::::.: ~:::::..:::.:::::.::.:::::::: :::• .::::::::::. ~::. v; :.: and:.«~up~1«~~.. ~t<<stc~r~~~ aria ma ~~ atta~k~ed:~r:: d~~~hed ~rar~ t 18 19 ~ The mnn~ ifs +~ ~r ~~.S~.att-F7a~e~aY J~~ in ~ 7~~ mir~im~ ~ ~+~ r ~ Sec. 30-82-b~ Manufactured Homes, Accessory (A) Intent -These regulations are adopted in recognition that certain families would benefit from living arrangements that allowed family members to reside in close proximity to each other but in separate dwelling units on the same lot. Also recognized in these provisions is the need for affordable housing alternatives for farm employees on bona-fide farm operations. 20 (B) General standards: 1. The accessory manufactured home shall be located on the same lot as a principal dwelling. This principal dwelling must be a single family dwelling ............. ..........................................:::::::::::::::..::::::: w::: :•::::: ww: :w::.};4iiiiiii:'•ii}i::.'v:: iiiiyiii"viiiiii:4i:: ' iii:^iiii::::i";' "•:j; ::.:}4i:':;:jLY.•{:::} }?:iii: ': i:;: . ; :::::.i':::::::::.: :. >:; .. , .:: turd::::h~rne::::shall:::>I'~~:>:$s:~.:~~han<.:'t.~.i:~s::l~:.: .:::::::::. ~.::.::.::.i:.ii::.:~:.:..: ~::>a~~.:i.:»r.:~~r~.::.:.:.~ ..:::::::::::::::::::::::.::::::::.~:::::.~::::::::::.::...:::::::::::::::.:~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:.::::::::::::::::. 2. The accessory manufactured home shall only be occupied by: a. A person or persons immediately related to the person or family in the principal dwelling. For the purposes of this Section, immediately related shall be any person or persons who are natural or legally defined offspring, parent, or grandparent of the owner of the principal dwelling; OR, b. A farm employee and his/her family in accordance with the provisions for farm employee housing contained el~sewi`iere in Ar~+Ele #r~<C1~. ~~. No accessory manufactured home shall be allowed within any Planned Residential Subdivision, as defined in Article II of this Ordinance. 21 4 The accessory manufactured home and the principal dwelling shall be located on the same lot of record. The lot of record must ~'x'tt#~'1 ~ :: rrt :::::::: > ::a z ::#~r<tf~~:::~~t~Ect<~r~h~cl~l~atr:a~~: ~~. The accessory manufactured home must be located behind the building line of the principal dwelling and shall meet the minimum side and rear yard setback requirements for principal structures in the district in which it is located. .............. 6. The accessory manufactured home shall be anchored a~ stabilized~~r' lt;€~ in accordance with the provisions of the Virginia Uniform Statewide ..:................ Building Code. , (C) Special Application Procedures: 1. Persons interested in obtaining a permit to install an accessory manufactured home shall make application to the Administrator, who shall have the authority to review and decide upon all applications. 2. In considering any application for an accessory manufactured home the 22 Administrator shall visit the proposed site to view the proposed location and the character of the surrounding area. In making a determination to issue or deny any application the Administrator shall consider all of the following factors: a. The purposes of the zoning ordinance outlined in Section 30-3. b. The effect of the proposed accessory manufactured home on the conservation of surrounding properties and their values, and its effect on the existing use and character of the property. c. The general land use compatibility of the accessory manufactured home in relation to surrounding properties. 3. If the Administrator determines that the proposal does not conform to any of the location, use or design standards contained in the above, the Administrator shall deny the application and notify the applicant in writing. Any such denial may be appealed to the Board of Zoning Appeals. 4. If the Administrator determines that the proposal conforms to the provisions of this Section, the Administrator shall mail a first class letter to all adjacent property owners notifying each owner of the County's intent to issue a 23 permit for the accessory manufactured home. All parties shall be given 15 days from the date of the notice to formally object in writing to the issuance of the permit. If an objection is filed, it shall be considered an appeal of the decision of the Administrator, and shall be considered by the Board of Zoning Appeals. The person filing the appeal shall be responsible for all required application and legal ad costs. 5. If no interested party objects within fifteen days of the date of the notice to the adjacent property owners, the administrator may approve the accessory manufactured home permit. 24 Sec. 30-82-8 Manufactured Home, Emergency (B) General standards: ;.<>:::::»>::;;<;>:<:.::::j[: ;: , ; :::::.:. ; : . M :: es~::::~ha~:::~t:~!::::fee~a~>>wtdth .iiiii:^i};;:;~~>IE~L:~C~e.~a&t7 :.: : ii~a~~~~~,f:~.~,w,~,.~~~:::;11.4~~.~,i,.::j~~ Vfi'.. ~ M.~:: ~ ......:..:..:.::::::::::: :•:::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :y::::::::::::: ?~iiiii:viiiiiiiiiiiii:ii :::::::::::::::::::::::::.~._::.~::::::: ryiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii:.iiiii}}}iii: i:::::::::: :v:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ~ The emergency manufactured home shall meet all setback and yard requirements for the district in which it is located. It shall be anchored and stabilized in accordance with the provisions of the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code. 4. The emergency manufactured home must be removed as soon as 25 reconstruction or replacement of the uninhabitable dwelling is complete, or within a 12 month period of its placement on the site, whichever is sooner. A one time extension of up to 6 additional months may be granted by the Administrator if substantial reconstruction of the destroyed dwelling has occurred, and work has, and is continuing to progress. A final certificate of zoning compliance for the reconstructed dwelling shall not be issued until the emergency manufactured home is removed from the site. Sec. 30-82-9 Manufactured Home Park (A) General standards: ~``<~s~..t~. n 4. In a Manufactured Home Park the f'i~ia~f~i:i~'~~t~ti~sf~~lbpi .::......................... ~erw~~a::~o >:w~t~::he:::r~.> u:Erem$nt~:o#>:~$~~€an f:~!:fe~~fr:~:lh:~r~d~ha~l: ot .:.:.......................................................:.:::::::::g::::::::::::::::::.~:::::::::::::::::................... ::I~ ::::::.::::::::.~::........::::::::::.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:::::::::::::::::::::::: €~~~< (L) In Manufactured home parks established prior to June 1, 1986, existing manufactured homes may be replaced with aS Manufactured Home~a consistent with Section 30-82-()K provided all of the following standards are met: 26 a. The manufactured home meets the side and rear yard setback for accessory structures, as specified in the underlying zoning district, from the property line of the park; b. The manufactured home is anchored t>€~s[r~3iiin accordance with the provisions of the Virginia Statewide Uniform Building Code; and, Sec. 30-82-10 Manufactured Housing Subdivision (A) General standards: 2. Use limitations: Areas designated on the approved preliminary plan as a manufactured housing subdivision shall be limited to~es~-^~o~ manufactured homed d~wfeltiaBs and single family dwellings. Where a combination of manufactured homes and single family dwellings are proposed, at least sixty percent (60%) of the lots shall be reserved exclusively for ^~e~"-~-or-o manufactured homes. 4. Plat designation: Plats recorded for a manufactured housing subdivision 27 shall contain the following statement, "This is a manufactured housing subdivision" and shall indicate which lots are reserved exclusively for class A-e~l~ manufactured homes. SEC. 30-83 CIVIC USES Sec. 30-83-0.5 Camps .......................................................... (B) 1~~1t~~tit~r~;~~<tr~~lr in the AG-3 and AG-1 Districts: 4. One year-round residence, including aGlass-~ Manufactured Home, may be constructed as a caretakers home in addition to other facilities on the property. Sec. 30-85-9 Campground (A) General standards: 6. One manufactured home, established pursuant to this ordinance, may be located in a campground as a caretaker's residence. SEC. 30-91 OFF STREET PARKING, STACKING AND LOADING 28 Sec. 30-91-9 Minimum Parking Required USE TYPE PARKING REQUIRED (B) Residential Use Types Manufactured Home; blase-A Manufactured Home, Accessory 2 spaces per dwelling unit 1 additional space All Sections of the Zoning Ordinance not specifically identified above shall remain unchanged by these proposed amendments. This ordinance shall become effective on July 1, 1995. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: wren a o on, epu y Jerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 29 ORDINANCE 62795-10 -AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE APPENDIX A OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Circuit Court emens, Judge, Roy B. Willett, Judge Clifford R. Weckstein, Judge Diane McQ. Strickland, Judge Richard C. Pattisall, Judge Robert P. Doherty, Jr. Judge Steven A. McGraw, Clerk Juvenile Domestic Relations District Court osep ar e, u ge Philip Trompeter, Judge John B. Fecr ~uson, Judge Joseph P. 6"ounds, Ju ge Ruth P. Bates, Clerk Intake Counsellor General District Court o n ~ ~ pos o ou, udge George W. Harris, Judge William Broadhurst, Judge Vincent Lilley Judge Theresa A. y~ildress, Clerk Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Magistrates Sherri Krantz~Betty Perry John H. Cease, Police C ief Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance O. Arnold yovey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Gary Robertson, Director, Utiligy Micryael Lazzuri Court Services Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer R. Wayne Compton Commissioner of Revenue Thomas C. Fuqua, thief, Fire & Rescue Bill Rand Director, General Services Thomas ~. Haislip, Director, Parks & Recreation Elaine Carver, Director, Procurement John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Main Library Roanoke Law Library 315 Church Avenue, SW, Rke 24016 Roanoke County Coc1e Book 30 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 27, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Amendments to Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance related to Manufactured Homes COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' In 1995 the legislature amended Section 15.1-486.3 of the Code of Virginia to mandate that manufactured homes, regardless of width, be allowed in all agricultural districts or districts where the dominant use is agricultural or forestry. This Code amendment goes into effect on July 1, 1995. In response to this amendment, the County staff and Planning Commission developed revisions to the zoning ordinance which include the following major features: 1. Allows all manufactured homes on individual lots, regardless of width, in the AG-3 and AG-1 zoning dis- tricts on a permanent foundation. 2. Continues to allow manufactured homes 19 feet or wider (double-wide) on individual lots in the AR, AV and all Residential districts under the same design guidelines established in 1986. 3. Continues the prohibition of manufactured homes in planned residential subdivisions in all zoning districts. 4. Maintains the prohibition on manufactured homes con- structed prior to July 1, 1976, reflecting the date when the Federal Manufactured Construction and Safety Stan- dards Act of 1974 was implemented nationwide. 5. Retains provisions for accessory manufactured homes in the AG-3 and AG-1 districts and the emergency manufac- tured homes in all districts where previously allowed. 6. Establishes a single use type for manufactured homes, replacing the previous "Class" system with comparable use and design standards where appropriate, consistent with the above objectives. ~- 2 In preparing these revisions, there were two areas discussed at length by the County staff and Commission. These are described more fully below. AR District The AR, Agricultural/Residential District was established in 1992 to coincide with the Rural Village land use category established in the 1985 Comprehensive Plan and to coincide with the function of the Residential Estates Zoning district contained in the old zoning ordinance. In establishing the uses permitted in this district it was recognized that while traditional rural uses would continue, the predominant use is or would become low density residential. In mapping these areas in the 1992 Comprehensive Map revisions, this district was applied to lands in the areas outside the urban service boundary that were already subdivided and substantially developed as rural residences. A further investigation found that the average lot size in these areas was 3.34 acres, with a median lot size of 1.09 acres. Based on these factors, it was the Commission's determination that these areas did not meet the test set forth in the amendments to the Code of Virginia the "dominant use was agriculture and forested." The Commission did consider the option of renaming the AR district in order to more clearly differentiate this district from the AG-3 and AG-1 districts. This would have required substantial revisions to references and citations throughout the zoning ordinance as well as amending large portions of the official zoning maps. For these reasons the Commission determined to retain the present district designation. Planned Residential Subdivisions This concept was established in 1986 as a way to identify properties outside the urban service boundary that had been platted for single family residences. Prior to 1992 there were no significant controls on density or system of managing where development occurred, resulting in numerous subdivi- sions in the more remote rural areas. Rather than spot zone these areas in a residential district, these properties were identified as planned residential subdivisions. In evaluating the amendments for manufactured homes, the Commission determined to continue this concept, since subdivisions of "five or more acres, with five or more lots of five acres or less" identified areas substantially residential in character and., like the AR district, did not meet the test that the "dominant use was agriculture and forested." At its meeting on June 6, 1995 the Planning Commission adopted the attached resolution recommending approval of the proposed amend- ments. The proposed amendments have been placed in ordinance form by the County Attorney's office, including some of the language contained in the Commission's resolution, and is also attached. ".~= ,~ 3 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: 1. Adopt the proposed amendments for manufactured homes in accordance with the amendments approved by the 1995 legisla- ture, effective July 1, 1995. Respectfully submitted, Approved, J~Snathan Hartley ~ssist. Dir., Planning & Zoning ~_ s ~r G ta~~~~• v_ f~ ,~ /Elmer C. Hod e County Administrator Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens Vote No Yes Abs Ty AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 6-, 1995 BE IT RESOLVED by the Roanoke County Planning Commission as follows: WHEREAS, Roanoke County adopted zoning provisions in 1986 which permitted manufactured homes throughout the County on individual lots under certain specific design requirements and established provisions for accessory manufactured homes, emergency manufactured homes and manufactured home parks and subdivsions; and WHEREAS, these provisions were proclaimed to be "innovative" by the Virginia Manufactured Housing Association and cited as a model ordinance to be considered by other jurisdictions; and WHEREAS, the legislature amended Section 15.1-486.3 of the Code of Virginia in 1990 to mandate that manufactured homes of 19 feet wide be allowed in all agricultural distircts or districts where the dominant use is agricultural or forestry, and further amended this Section in 1995 by deleting the reference to 19 feet in width; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at their worksessions on April 18, 1995 and May 16, 1995, discussed various options for amending the County Zoning Ordinance to implement the changes mandated by the amendments to the Code of Virginia; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that the AG-3 and AG-1 zoning districts consist of the only districts where the dominant use is agriculture or forestry; and WHEREAS, the Commission has further determined that the AR district is primarily a rural residential district based on the districts intent, character, location and distribution of lot sizes: and WHERAS, the Commission has also determined that the character of planned residential subdivisions are such that they do not constitute areas where the dominant use is agriculture and forestry. NOW THERFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends that the Proposed Amendments to the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance for Manufactured Homes dated May 24, 1995 be adopted in order to comply with the above mentioned amendments to the Code of Viriginia. Approved by the Roanoke County Planning Commission on June 6, 1995. Terrance L. Harrington, Secre ry -r-y AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 27, 1995 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING ORDINANCE 82592-12, THE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR ROANOKE COUNTY, BY THE ADOPTION OF CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO SAID ORDINANCE RELATING TO MANUFACTURED HOMES WHEREAS, Roanoke County adopted zoning provisions in 1986 which permitted manufactured homes throughout the County on individual lots under certain specific design requirements and established provisions for accessory manufactured homes, emergency manufactured homes and manufactured home parks and subdivisions; and WHEREAS, these provisions were proclaimed to be "innovative" by the Virginia Manufactured Housing Association and cited as a model ordinance to be considered by other jurisdictions; and WHEREAS, the legislature amended Section 15.1-486.3 of the Code of Virginia in 1990 to mandate that manufactured homes of 19 feet wide be allowed in all agricultural districts or districts where the dominant use is agricultural or forestry, and further amended this Section in 1995 by deleting the reference to 19 feet in width; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at their work sessions on April 18, 1995 and May 16, 1995, discussed various options for amending the County Zoning Ordinance to implement the changes mandated by the amendments to the Code of Virginia; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that the AG-3 and AG-1 zoning districts consist of the only districts where the dominant use is agriculture or T-`~ forestry; and WHEREAS, the Commission has further determined that the AR district is primarily a rural residential district based on the districts intent, character, location and distribution of lot sizes: and WHEREAS, the Commission has also determined that the character of planned residential subdivisions are such that they do not constitute areas where the dominant use is agriculture and forestry; and WHEREAS, after a public hearing on June 6, 1995, the Planning Commission recommended that the Proposed Amendments to the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance for Manufactured Homes be adopted in order to comply with the above mentioned amendments to the Code of Virginia; and WHEREAS, on August 25, 1992, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted Ordinance 82592-12 which enacted a new zoning ordinance for Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, since the adoption of the new zoning ordinance the need for the adoption of several amendments have been identified; and WHEREAS, in the interest of public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice, the Board of Supervisors hereby amends certain provisions of the Zoning Ordinance for Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law, and that the first reading of this ordinance was held on May 23, 1995, and the second reading and public hearing was held on June 27, 1995. 2 1-`~ BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the Zoning Ordinance for Roanoke County, adopted on August 25, 1992, be, and hereby is amended and reenacted, as follows: PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE ROANOKE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE FOR MANUFACTURED HOMES ARTICLE I GENERAL PROVISIONS Sec. 30-23-2 Nonconforming Uses of Buildings, Structures or Land (H) Notwithstanding (A) through (G) above, a nonconforming manufactured home existing on an individual lot of record that has served as an active dwelling for at least six months may be replaced with ........................ ~ ~riother'Imanufactured home provided: 1. The replacement home is installed on the lot within four months of the removal of the home to be replaced, and; 3 T'~ 2. The replacement home is installed in approximately the same location on the lot, and is installed to comply with the setback regulations for principal structures, and; 3. The installation of the replacement home complies with the Use and Design standards for manufactured homes contained in Section 30-82-8 TL~•, a~.~ (B~. .............. ARTICLE II DEFINITIONS AND USE TYPES SEC. 30-28 DEFINITIONS MANUFACTURED HOME - A structure, transportable in one or more sections, which in the traveling mode is 8 body feet or more in width or 40 body feet or more in length, or, when erected on site, is 320 or more square feet, and which is built on a permanent chassis and designed to be used as a dwelling with or without a permanent foundation. A manufactured home shall contain one dwelling unit. Some manufactured homes are also referred to as mobile homes. PLANNED RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION - A development; tf~~itr` ................................................. ............................................... .:.;. r~~rt.::;.;:;.~~re:::.iharr~~ ~u ' rvt5ton constructed on a tract of at least five acres, planned and developed as an integral residential neighborhood unit. The 4 .v.4B subdivision shall consist of five or more lots of five acres or less, each lot designed and intended for the placement of a residential dwelling. SEC. 30-29 USE TYPES; GENERALLY Sec. 30-29-2 Residential Use Types !MANLJFA~TIJRED HOME ~ A:s~ngle or muit,'s~ct~onal manufactured home a .................................................................... . ~i~~in~d in Section'30 28 ...................................................................... MANUFACTURED HOME, ACCESSORY - A Ciass~-R-manufactured home that is subordinate to a single family dwelling n a single lot and meets the additional criteria contained in Section 30-82-. 5 > > MANUFACTURED HOME, EMERGENCY - A Cis-lammanufactured home used temporarily for the period of reconstruction or replacement of an uninhabitable dwelling lost or destroyed by fire, flood, or other act of nature, or used temporarily as housing relief to victims of a federally declared disaster in accordance with Section 30-82-8. MANUFACTURED HOME SUBDIVISION - A five acre or larger community of manufactured home dwellings with lots that are subdivided for individual ownership. MANUFACTURED HOME PARK - A five acre or larger tract of land intended to accommodate a manufactured home community of multiple spaces for lease or condominium ownership. A manufactured home park is also referred to as a mobile home park. 6 ~'-h ARTICLE III -DISTRICT REGULATIONS SEC. 3x32 AG-3 AGRICULTURAURURAL PRESERVE DISTRICT Sec. 30-32-2 Permitted Uses (A) 2. Residential Uses Accessory Apartment Home Occupation, Type I and Type II Kennel, Private t~lan~faet~red Horne ............................................................ ............................................................... .............................................................. Manufactured Home, Accessory * Manufactured Home, Emergency Residential Human Care Facility Single Family Dwelling, Detached SEC. 30-33 AG-1 AGRICULTURAL/RURAL LOW DENSITY DISTRICT Sec. 30-33-2 Permitted Uses 7 ~j (A) 2. Residential Uses Accessory Apartment Home Occupation, Type I and Type II Kennel, Private ............................................................... Mar~ufab#urdd Hc~rn~a::< .............................................................. ............................................................... .............................................................. ............................................................... Manufactured Home, Accessory * Manufactured Home, Emergency Residential Human Care Facility Single Family Dwelling, Detached SEC. 30-34 AR AGRICULTURAL/RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Sec. 30-34-1 Purpose (A) These areas are generally characterized by very low density residential and ___ institutional uses mixed with s;mal#er pat~e~s that have h1~~~±r'iC~[l~ Gt~Ctt~ineci ':te agricultural uses, forest land and open space outside the urban service area. These areas provide an opportunity for rural living in convenient proximity to urban services and employment. Agricultural uses should be encouraged to be maintained 8 -~ u may. Over time, however, these areas are expected to become increasingly residential in character, with residential development becoming the dominant use over agricultural and more rural type uses. The purpose of this district, consistent with the Rural Village land use category in the Comprehensive Plan, is to maintain these areas essentially in their rural state, consistent with the level of services anticipated by the County. These areas are generally suitable for low density residential development and other compatible land uses. Sec. 30-34-2 Permitted Uses (A) 1. Agricultural and Forestry Uses Agriculture Forestry Operations Stable, Private Stable, Commercial Wayside Stand 9 ~~ 2. Residential Uses Accessory Apartment Home Occupation, Type I Kennel, Private * * Manufactured Home, Emergency Residential Human Care Facility Single Family Dwelling, Detached SEC. 30-36 AV VILLAGE CENTER DISTRICT Sec. 30-36-2 Permitted Uses (A) 2. Residential Uses Accessory Apartment Home Beauty/Barber Salon Home Occupation, Type I Kennels, Private Manu#actured Flome 10 T-~ * Manufactured Home, Emergency Residential Human Care Facility Single Family Dwelling, Attached Single Family Dwelling, Detached Two Family Dwelling SEC. 30-41 R-1 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Sec. 30-41-2 Permitted Uses (A) 1. Residential Uses Home Occupation, Type I ~ll~nufapi~red_ H~arr~ * Manufactured Home, Emergency Residential Human Care Facility Single Family Dwelling, Detached (For Zero Lot Line Option - *) Single Family Dwelling, Attached SEC. 30-42 R-2 MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT 11 r-~ Sec. 3x42-2 Permitted Uses (A) 1. Residential Uses Accessory Apartment Home Occupation, Type I Kennel, Private M~rtufaetured Home * Manufactured Home, Emergency Residential Human Care Facility Single Family Dwelling, Attached Single Family Dwelling, Detached (For Zero Lot Line Option - *) Two Family Dwelling SEC. 30-45 R-3 MEDIUM DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Sec. 30-45-2 Permitted Uses (A) 1. Residential Uses Accessory Apartment 12 -r-~ Home Occupation, Type I nu'ctur~tl;; Home , * Manufactured Home, Emergency Multi-family Dwelling Residential Human Care Facility Single Family Dwelling, Attached Single Family Dwelling, Detached (For Zero Lot Line Option - *) Townhouse Two Family Dwelling SEC. 30-46 R-4 HIGH DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Sec. 30-46-2 Permitted Uses (A) 1. Residential Uses Accessory Apartment Home Occupation, Type I * Manufactured Home, Emergency 13 T'} Multi-family Dwelling Residential Human Care Facility Single Family Dwelling, Attached Single Family Dwelling, Detached (For Zero Lot Line Option - *) Townhouse Two Family Dwelling 14 T-Y ARTICLE N USE AND DESIGN STANDARDS SEC. 30-81 AGRICULTURAL AND FORESTRY USES Sec. 30-81-3 Farm Employee Housing (A) General standards: 1. Ari 'Accessory Manufactured Home, shall be permitted as an accessory use to an agricultural use exclusively for a farm employee, and his/her family '; eer~ai~vi~ .. the requirements contained °'~°~~~"°Y° ;^ +",~. n.+.,-.° ~~ Sector} 30-82, fi. SEC. 3x-82 RESIDENTIAL USES ,..:: Sec 3~8~-~5 'Manu<fiactur±~d 1-m A Indent 'Manufactur'ed #~ornes:: provide a vi~k~le. dnd afford~k~le I1t~usin~ ~tp#ia~t ft~ t ) .:................ a:~r~nt of :fe;`~ounty's p~apu~atiz~n 'his h4usinc~ ~ptia~ t~ prov~de~ ~~ areas ............ ......... ............ ......... ..........: :.:....: ......:::::::..... . ........... :: .:::::::::::: ::.::::::::::::::::.....::::::::: :::.):::.i:.i:.i:.:.iiii::^::^i:.i:4:.: iiiiiii:::.:':.::'.iii}iiiiii::^:.i:.i:.i:~Y'}i:'.ii: i:~: Y', >re~~miratel "'ov'a `XiCultural as~d f~r~st',u~~~h r>~i~~~al ru~r~rnents cx~ns~stent I~::.......:. ~ ......... g .:. .... ....... .::.. .. _ .. ..................._ _ _........:. _ ..:::::::::.:::::.:::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.::..:::::..:.:. <;.i>ii: >i>i:.i::.>;<:, :i .iii::.iii:.;:::.i:.i:<:.i:.i:.:iii;:::<.>.::.i:.;:.;:;:.:;:«:.::. ~+1!th tfte State`` Ct~de Th1~ op~[ort 1s c'~I ~~'t~~llt~BE~;:~II1K~@[' ~:e~l#'7 C~~?~f~l'I cr1~BCl~ irl 15 T~ :.>:.>:.:;«<.>::::.:i:>:.;:.;::>:.;::i':':.:::;>:;:.:::<.:; ...;::::i~>::::::.:::;::;:.:::.>:.:i:>:::i':<:::.:'::;:::.:;: »:<::i;;:::.::::i:;:::;::::.:;::;s:«<.:;:>'.:'.;::;:<;.:i':i~`~{>:-~:;~!:y:y¢¢":::i~:;.:>~':.y:; '::,:i'>~::;:+.:~;~<+.>~::j..•:>:.>::.:::;~:;y~~:;,::M':~:`>~:::i;;' ::.:it~:;);:.>:{~:y.>~:>:.>::>~.>y:.ry:<p;:>{!.>~:::::: :: :. :::: ~ : ~ ~:.::. . ~;: ;. ' ' '.' .. ~ :: ' ::' '; ::.:::: ~ ' ..:i;i;. ~. ~ .:. ' ' ~ ;:. [;:::: ' .: ~:+isYYaYI[i~V~t:a':t~Ja~:Flai~~[::7f;~ Lt i;i;~~;.~i~! '.:I I IGI:;t~~. rrto~e .r.:eaide~tra~i..::.d~~t~l.~ I:. ar..~as:: ~rv>"i~r~;~~~ ::.::::::.:::::::::::::.::.::.;:.;:.:;;:.;;:.;:.;:<.;:.::.:::::::;:::::::::::::::.;:.::<~.;:.>:.;:.;:.>:.>:.;:.;;. ...................................................... led ::>::>:;:.;;:.; ~.;:<~:.;~?~;:;.;:.;;;;:.;;~ :.:::::.~,.~.;:.;:.: >::>::>:::. a :a#ar~~~r::d~:::~n indi~du~I. I~t~. r~~~~:>:r~~r~~c#u~ed h?~m~ earl .>::::»»::.Tkte I~a~€Qn :~f a m~anufa~t~ar.~d ~~~t: ~~:~:::~tanns:;r~~~dent~a~ ~ud~v~~vn,. a~:;defi~~c~ ;iii Art#~ It of this orclinanoe, ~ha~i be prp~rb~ted. ~. _o mari~faur~~ ~~m~s c~rr~stru~~d bard ~u1~ ~, j ~7 ~hal~ b~ erecter, rs~alleci, +~c~up~ect ~~ s~lc~ ~n Roanc~i~e ~eur~t~, exile under t~-e fgIlaw~ng, '~c~c1-#€o~> a: 'Thy man~tfactcared home existed Sri:': th~~aunt)r .pri~?rty° Marti: ~~, ... 1986,,,and sha~l'k~~ allov+ed to be relQCa#e~:anr~{~~;r~ma~r~ ~n a mobEle home :dark;,' and;; Tf~~ i~nufactu`rect home ~s ~q~at~~l 4utsfde a m~-b~le h~~e patk sh~l1', b`~ atldwed'to remain subject td the prov~s~orts fQr-non conf©rrnin~', !uses c©ntained in Article I ~f ~h[s,flrd[nan+cc .:::::>:::::::;:::>:: ,:.:.,.;:.;:.::.;:::.::.:.:.:;.;::.., .::::.;.::.;:.;::: ;:. :.; ::.;:.;:.:.; ::.::.:;:.;:.;:.;.:::.;;:.;:.:tea d >: '.<TMa manufat#ure~i I~c~me shall ~av~::~h~. tow as~e~~l~ andf~eels re ~e - 16 T-y <: ; ' > . .:::>< ::':>: .> ;::> ~r~d::>~~;:~:::: gar:.~~n:~>::~o~~d~t~~r~~a~d:sl~(r~:.:::,:.«<!n ~e::rn:~ur~~~rl::.: end.: ~n~h.::::::::.~ ::::::::::::::::::.::::<.:.;::.;:.;;>;>::::::::.:::::::::::::::.::::<:<.:'.::.::.::.:::;:::::::::::;::::::::::::::.:::::::::::: .: :::....... .::.:.~ :.y::.;•;:>.:;::::... .... :.. ':a; ., -.: .:.: - r...,;.-:': a::S::.:-; S''.:.::'•: i:; ':: r:.;.::.:~..:.»::: :: ~... ;r.a .>?:.;;.y..;:;> ~ _: :r.r;;:;;..:vr: u:; s.;.:r •;?• r:.ra::;> anrd~r~~~::>~~ .:tpu~s~~s~~::t::#l~e ~t~r~ r~~fnrr» ~t~t.~vu~!~ ~u~lc~rt ................. ................. >:::'';:;:>.:..:.: r >h~m~':sha11..b~:d~~lar'ec~~:;..:~r~~n~ntly :a ~x~.:.:.; ::.:..:.:...:::. 9 ~,;:;:: '::::,:.The . manu~aetu ~d>: ;:.: <;; :::.:.::: , , , .:::......... d tae>i ~~) ` ~dtl(~i~irl~f stanciarda trt ~~ Af~;> A~, arty all ,Res~der~t~ai ~IS~tf'i~CS:;t~l~ I~rd-v~duat iOf~ 1 The manufactured horrie sh~f~' have' a m~rtimur~ w~~ith bf 1 ~ feet >.:::;::::;.':::::.::.::::: :.. ~ :;ahal~ b~ ve~~~::>:wfia;:;nan-~`~?#~~~i~e ;rn~~eri~1 ,;;: The ar~~tur~~ hc~m ;. >:. ;::a<::s[~~-ui~.: dv±rell~n '::;:~~~1~:::a~:.;::~u~<:;nr~t>::l.~r~~e:.>:~!~»>~~i? st~~ng, pIyvvot~l, f~ric~, stQne,ar stttccQ:; :::>:::::::::>::>: ; >~fa~u~a~;home::hail.f~a~~:;:a:::~.:::~~::~~' .............. :... ::::::::::.::TYt~:>m.::.::::::::::.:::.::::.:.::.:::::::::.:::::::.:::::::::::::::::::::::.::::::::::.:.:.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::..::p ::::::::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::: r~fi;shall:;.~~:.>~cr~ere~[:.with:nat~-r~#i~~t~~e.ma~~rs;:ut.>;~~ bt:tt.>:~?t~#:::I~rr'!::.::;::;: __ _. _ . ire, f~krgla~s ~l~rngles, aspf~ta[t shr~~i~s, or~ wap~l shakes ,...,:.. ;;::.;. ~>>::.. '::::>'~'he manufactured home site' shall'..Dave`::>;~'`stvfag'<are~:en~l~~e ` Qn a l' s~de~; l~av~~ at lest ~aQ cubic ~ee~ ar~~ de~~+~ned t~c~r~ :hard equipment ~r1~1::~u....:[~e~, the stvr~ge arsa:~na~ b~' a~achhe~l ~r ~eta~h±~c~:frc~m:.#I~e ::. 17 T~ rr[ t~tij 18 T-y ~~ • ~~ Sec. 30-8233 Manufactured Homes, Accessory (A) Intent -These regulations are adopted in recognition that certain families would benefit from living arrangements that allowed family members to reside in close proximity to each other but in separate dwelling units on the same lot. Also recognized in these provisions is the need for affordable housing alternatives for farm employees on bona-fide farm operations. 19 'y (B} General standards: 1. The accessory manufactured home shall be located on the same lot as a principal dwelling. This principal dwelling must be a single family dwelling ::><»:>:::>::>::>::»:::: ;::: ~~z~:.>hor~€e>;s}~al~::.:lae::::~~~~::::tl~a0:::::1::9:f:~et.:~r~,.;w~.;:::.:. 2. .::::.::::::::.'f ~~.: ~c~e~~Q.:::m~nufia~u.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:..:::::::::::.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:::::::;:.::::::::. The accessory manufactured home shall only be occupied by: a. A person or persons immediately related to the person or family in the principal dwelling. For the purposes of this Section, immediately related shall be any person or persons who are natural or legally defined offspring, parent, or grandparent of the owner of the principal dwelling; OR, b. A farm employee and his/her family in accordance with the provisions for farm employee housing contained e~sew#~ere in Ai-tifl2 S~'GtiDn ~$'~ -~. ~4. No accessory manufactured home shall be allowed within any Planned Residential Subdivision, as defined in Article II of this Ordinance. 20 T-4 4. The accessory manufactured home and the principal dwelling shall be .......................... located on the same lot of record. The lot of record must «af ;.. , :::: t~1Err~u~f1 lat size for t1~e d~~#t~~~ fn w~# ~~~tet The accessory manufactured home must be located behind the building line of the principal dwelling and shall meet the minimum side and rear yard setback requirements for principal structures in the district in which it is located. 6. The accessory manufactured home shall be anchored!;: a~ stabilized:; rtilj sirtd in accordance with the provisions of the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code. , (C) Special Application Procedures: 1. Persons interested in obtaining a permit to install an accessory manufactured home shall make application to the Administrator, who shall have the authority to review and decide upon all applications. 2. In considering any application for an accessory manufactured home the 21 T-~ Administrator shall visit the proposed site to view the proposed location and the character of the surrounding area. In making a determination to issue or deny any application the Administrator shall consider all of the following factors: a. The purposes of the zoning ordinance outlined in Section 30-3. b. The effect of the proposed accessory manufactured home on the conservation of surrounding properties and their values, and its effect on the existing use and character of the property. c. The general land use compatibility of the accessory manufactured home in relation to surrounding properties. 3. If the Administrator determines that the proposal does not conform to any of the location, use or design standards contained in the above, the Administrator shall deny the application and notify the applicant in writing. Any such denial may be appealed to the Board of Zoning Appeals. 4. If the Administrator determines that the proposal conforms to the provisions of this Section, the Administrator shall mail a first class letter to all adjacent property owners notifying each owner of the County's intent to issue a 22 ~i 6 permit for the accessory manufactured home. All parties shall be given 15 days from the date of the notice to formally object in writing to the issuance of the permit. If an objection is filed, it shall be considered an appeal of the decision of the Administrator, and shall be considered by the Board of Zoning Appeals. The person filing the appeal shall be responsible for all required application and legal ad costs. 5. If no interested party objects within fifteen days of the date of the notice to the adjacent property owners, the administrator may approve the accessory manufactured home permit. 23 i~~ Sec. 3x82-8 Manufactured Home, Emergency (B) General standards: :>:<:::>::::>::>::3'~~:accso .::~ttuf~cftared;~~rrte:~~~lika.[:~~s::tharf::~~::~~ rr~ w~.:..::':t F. The emergency manufactured home shall meet all setback and yard requirements for the district in which it is located. It shall be anchored and stabilized in accordance with the provisions of the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code. 4;~. The emergency manufactured home must be removed as soon as 24 ~~ Ox'! reconstruction or replacement of the uninhabitable dwelling is complete, or within a 12 month period of its placement on the site, whichever is sooner. A one time extension of up to 6 additional months may be granted by the Administrator if substantial reconstruction of the destroyed dwelling has occurred, and work has, and is continuing to progress. A final certificate of zoning compliance for the reconstructed dwelling shall not be issued until the emergency manufactured home is removed from the site. Sec. 30-82-9 Manufactured Home Park (A) General standards: ,.: . 4. In a Manufactured Home Park the 'r~~r~i~factured hQrrm,e ~~al1:'''ls~s`#har! 19 feet: in width ar~d shall' Qthervis$ ~;~m : l :~ >i~~.`t}~ ~~ : ~~r~r0~r~t~o~' . ~ctiQri (L) In Manufactured home parks established prior to June 1, 1986, existing manufactured homes may be replaced with a-Glass--~ Manufactured Homed-a consistent with Section 30-82- ~~! provided all of the following standards are met: 25 _(`_- `I a. The manufactured home meets the side and rear yard setback for accessory structures, as specified in the underlying zoning district, from the property line of the park; b. The manufactured home is anchored t~rt>in accordance with the provisions of the Virginia Statewide Uniform Building Code; and, Sec. 30-82-10 Manufactured Housing Subdivision (A) General standards: 2. Use limitations: Areas designated on the approved preliminary plan as a manufactured housing subdivision shall be limited t manufactured homes ~ and single family dwellings. Where a combination of manufactured homes and single family dwellings are proposed, at least sixty percent (60%) of the lots shall be reserved exclusively for Blase-A-~er-~ manufactured homes. 4. Plat designation: Plats recorded for a manufactured housing subdivision 26 T-4 shall contain the following statement, "This is a manufactured housing subdivision" and shall indicate which lots are reserved exclusively for Blass ~~ manufactured homes. SEC. 3x83 CIVIC USES Sec.3a83-0.5 Camps (B) Atr{~;~iQ~al st~ndard~ in the AG-3 and AG-1 Districts: 4. One year-round residence, including a f~as~Pk Manufactured Home, may be constructed as a caretakers home in addition to other facilities on the property. Sec. 30-85-9 Campground (A) General standards: 6. One manufactured home, established pursuant to this ordinance, may be located in a campground as a caretaker's residence. SEC. 3x91 OFF STREET PARKING, STACKING AND LOADING 27 Sec. 30-91-9 Minimum Parking Required USE TYPE (B) Residential Use Types Manufactured Home, ~~~ Manufactured Home, Accessory PARKING REQUIRED 2 spaces per dwelling unit 1 additional space T-V All Sections of the Zoning Ordinance not specifically identified above shall remain unchanged b~ these proposed amendments. This ordinance shall become effective on July 1, 1995. common.mh95d.zo 28 .• .• f AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JUNE 27, 1995 ORDINANCE 62795-11 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 68.4 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED BEYOND THE TERMINUS OF TODDSBURY DRIVE TO THE EAST (TAX MAP NOS. 51.03-1-1 AND 51.03-1-2) IN THE VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF AG-3 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF AR WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF ARFER CORPORATION WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on April 25, 1995, and the second reading and public hearing were held May 23, 1995, and continued to June 27, 1995; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on May 2, 1995; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 68.4 acres, as described herein, and located beyond the terminus of Toddsbury Drive to the east, (Tax Map Numbers 51.03-1-1 and 51.03-1-2) in the Vinton Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of AG-3, Agricultural/Rural Preserve District, to the zoning classification of AR, Agricultural/Residential District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Akfer Corporation. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Tax Map No. 51.03-1-1 - BEGINNING at a post on the Lawhorn line; thence S. 51 deg. 15' W. 163.5 feet to an iron pipe near 1 a large rock on the side of a gully; thence S. 3 deg. E. 743 feet to a white oak on a ridge; thence S. 32 deg. E. 550 feet passing an iron pin in the bottom of a hollow to a poplar near a rock; thence S. 65 deg. E. 223 feet to an iron pin in the center of the Vinton-Roanoke Water Company road passing a red oak near the edge of road; thence with the center of said road N. 57 deg. E. 60 feet; thence N. 39 deg. 39' E. 177.8 feet; thence N. 49 deg. 30' E. 167 feet to the Baker line; thence with said Baker line N. 4 deg. 45' W. 780 feet, more or less, to a post corner to Lawhorn land; thence with said Lawhorn line, N. 57 deg. 51' W. 247.2 feet to a stone; thence N. 53 deg. 6' W. 180 feet to a white oak; thence N. 47 deg. 8' W 197 feet to a post at the place of beginning, and containing 19.407 acres, more or less, according to a survey made by C. M. Stancliff, Certified Surveyor. Tax Map No. 51.03-1-2 - BEGINNING at a double chestnut oak on side of mountain and off from same a new line S. 47 deg. 30' E. 53.08 poles to a white oak; thence N. 53 deg. 30' E. 11.52 poles to a stone; thence S. 58 deg. 15' E. 16.80 poles to a point near a small branch (the remainder of the description being copied from the original description in the deed from James Gardner to Jno. R. Hannabas, with the courses as follows:) thence N. 88 deg. -- 29.52 poles to a point; S. 54 deg. 30' E. 18 poles to the road; thence with the road N. 89 deg. E. 9 1/16 poles to a point; N. 59 deg. 15' E. 19 poles to the middle of the road; thence leaving the road N. 13 deg. 15' W. 32 poles to a hickory; N. 82 deg. 45' E. 60 poles; N. 30 deg. 15' W. 11.64 poles; S. 58 deg. 45' W. 75 poles to the beginning, at a double chestnut oak. The above description of land contains 49 acres, more or less, but the land is sole in gross and not by the acre. 4. That the owner has voluntarily proferred, in writing, the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors accepts: (1) The developer of this property shall, at their sole expense, provide an additional asphalt surface overlayed along the entire length of the existing Toddsbury Drive. This new asphalt surface shall have a thickness of one and one half inches (1.5") on those portions of Toddsbury Drive between the intersection of Falling Creek Drive and Burnt Quarter Drive (lower intersection). The remaining portions of Toddsbury Drive from Burnt Quarter Drive (lower intersection) to its present cul-de-sac terminus shall be overlayed with an additional two inches (2") of asphalt surface. These improvements to Toddsbury shall be completed prior to Roanoke County and the Virginia Department of Transportation, accepting for maintenance, any new streets in Falling Creek Section 8. 2 (2) No structure proposed for_ construction within the 68.4 acres shall have a base floor elevation of greater than 1820 feet above sea level. All future subdivision plats for this 68.4 acres shall contain covenant restrictions limiting the base floor elevations to 1820 feet or less. All applicants for building permits for new structures shall provide an engineering certification that the structure proposed has a base floor elevation of 1820 feet or less. (3) All lots shall be served by public water. Any water tank constructed shall be located such that the top of the tank shall not extend above the ridgeline of the property. Any water tank constructed shall be painted in a dark or muted color. (4) No more than 47 residential lots shall be platted on the 68.4 acres. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance with conditions, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix NAYS: Supervisor Eddy ABSTAIN: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 3 .~-•c ~ Ir f \~ atu°~o ~ ,~, ~f V . ~-`~ __ - Ise: " C o0 ~ R04NOKE CCU .,.~a t ~ t ~ I .~,.:~.,..~._ sm......o. - ro oraion ..~i.U VICINITY MAP ~.. K.~Ca ~ ~. .~ ~_ y1.uwO r ~ . .~_. _ w[s[•wr i v y_ ,y ~ T-s NORTH O f 2 •'b ...• ~ ~ pu ~ \ I 1 k~.• ~ 1ssw ~, - ~ ~y 1~7 ,• a.. 1 V w ~~ ~ Bedtad * DEPARTTgNr OF PLANZ`1II\'G AFKER CORPORATION ~~_ ...... ~....~~ TAX # 51.0-1-1. -2 ~"~o ~ Ot_ ~or .~..., ~~ o~ / F ,~.{ ~~~~ •--^ /'"'" Statement of Proffers June 22, 1995 I, Don F. Gross, owner of Roanoke County Tax Parcels 51.03- 1-1 and 51.03-1-2, do hereby voluntarily offer the following proffers in association with the AG3 to AR rezoning request filed by AKFER Corporation: 1. The developer of this property shall, at their sole expense, provide an additional asphalt surface overlayed along the entire length of the existing Toddsbury Drive. This new asphalt surface shall have a thickness of one and one half inches (1.5") on those. portions of Toddsbury Drive between the intersection of Falling Creek Drive and Burnt Quarter Drive (lower intersection). The remaining portions of Toddsbury Drive from Burnt Quarter Drive (lower intersection) to its present cul-de-sac terminus shall be overlayed with an additional two inches (2") of asphalt surface. These improvements to Toddsbury shall be completed prior to Roanoke County and the Virginia Department of Transportation, accepting for maintenance, any new streets in Falling Creek Section 8. 2. No structure proposed for construction within the 68.4 acres shall have a base floor elevation of greater than 1820 feet above sea level. A11 future subdivision plats for this 68.4 acres shall contain covenant restrictions limiting the base floor elevations to 1820 feet or less. All applicants for building permits for new structures shall provide an engineering certification that the structure proposed has a base floor elevation of 1820 feet or less. 3. All lots shall constructed shall be not extend above the constructed shall be 4. No more than 47 68.4 acres. Signed: be served by public water. Any water tank located such that the top of the tank shall ridgeline of the property. Any water tank painted in a dark or muted color. residential lots shall be platted on the Don F. ros , Owner 1 ~5 M E M O R A N D U M TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM : ELMER HODGE ! ~ h-- SUBJECT: REZONING BEYOND/TODDSBURY DRIVE UPON THE PETITION OF AKFER CORPORATION DATE: JUNE 23, 1995 This proposal is much better than the one originally presented. Mr. Ferguson is working with the Planning and Zoning staff to address some issues including ridge line protection and street access. We would like to have a lower density and we are continuing discussions on this issue. Assuming we are able to work remaining issues, we would recommend approval of this request. • ~. PETITIONER: AKFER CORPORATION ~ ~" CASE NUMBER: 18-5/95 Planning Commission Hearing Date: May 2, 1995 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: May 23, 1995 (CONY) June 27, 1995 A. REQUEST Petition of Akfer Corporation to rezone approximately 68.4 acres from AG-3 to AR to construct single family detached dwellings, located beyond the terminus of Toddsbury Drive to the east, Vinton Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS Emmett Greeley asked about road construction, the concept plan and access. Staff replied as follows: the roads will be built to state standards; the concept plan is a tentative plan of what is proposed; when land is platted, plans are made to provide eventual future access to adjoining properties to ensure that adjacent lots are not landlocked. Allan Hunter stated that his property is accessed by Laurel Glen Road (a private road which is maintained by the water company) and he asked for assurances that he would have access to Toddsbury for emergency purposes. Donald Hale and Ed Hale said that they are not opposed to the project; however, they would like access to Toddsbury. It would improve fire and emergency access, particularly, in the winter. John Hannabass expressed concern with additional traffic on Laurel Glen Road. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Commission questioned why the concept plan does not meet subdivision regulations. Staff responded that lot one shown on the plan has no road frontage and we question whether all of the lots have 110 feet of road frontage. The Commission expressed concern with the removal of trees and screening of the water tank. In response to the Commission, Don Slusher, surveyor, commented: the lots have not been soil tested for percolation but we have had a soil scientist on site to evaluate the possibility of doing this project; VDOT has looked at preliminary design which show 12 percent grades (for short distances) which they will accept. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS None. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Robinson said that the proposal is an extension of an existing subdivision and moved to recommend approval of the request with conditions. The motion failed to carry with the following roll call vote: AYES: Robinson NAYS: Ross, Thomason, Hooker, Witt ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE Mr. Ross commented that he was concerned with density, ridgetop protection, and additional traffic on Toddsbury. Ms. Hooker concurred and stated that the proposal does not conform to the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Witt said by approving this request, we would be setting a precedent; this is not good planning. Mr. Thomason agreed and said the plan needs more work. G. ATTACHMENTS: Concept Plan _ Staff Report Terrance H ng Roanoke unto Vicinity Map _ Other Commission TS .-~ J STAFF REPORT Case Number: 18-5/95 Prepared by: Terrance Harrington Applicant: Akfer Corporation Date: May 2,1995 PART I A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Petitioner is requesting to rezone land from AG-3, Agricultural/Rural Preserve District to AR, Agricultural/Residential District. In 1992 when the Board of Supervisors adopted a new zoning ordinance and maps this land was zoned AG-3, in accordance with the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan designation, policies and guidelines. In zoning this property AG-3, the Board recognized the importance of maintaining some lands in Roanoke County, that are unique natural and scenic resources, in their rural state. The Board also recognized that it is particularly critical to protect, through reduced development densities, those areas that consist of steep slopes. The AR district does not afford the same level of protection to areas consisting of wooded, steep, mountainous terrain. The allowable densities in the AR district are almost 4 1/2 times greater than those allowed in the AG-3 district. The petitioner's request is not in conformance with the density guidelines of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan for the Rural Preserve land use designation. B. DESCRIPTION Petitioner is requesting to rezone two parcels of land from AG-3 to AR. These properties are located in the Vinton Magisterial District and total 68.4 acres. Petitioner's property is located approximately 500 feet to the east of the northern terminus of Toddsbury Drive and will be an extension of the Falling Creek Estates subdivision. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS 1. The Agricultural/Residential District allows a variety of permitted uses including agricultural and forestry uses, single family detached dwellings and a limited number of civic uses. With public water and private septic, as the petitioner proposes, minimum lot size is 30,000 square feet (approximately 1 1/2 lots per acre) with 110 feet of public road frontage. The AG-3 District allows 1 lot per 3 acres with 200 feet of public road frontage. 2. Subdivision and site plan review will be required. 1 ~' PART II A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS 1. Lot Area - Petitioner's request involves two parcels of land - 49 acres and 19.4 acres - totalling 68.4 acres. 2. Location and Description - These parcels are located in eastern Roanoke County and are situated to the east of the subdivision known as Falling Creek. These properties are located on the southern side of Stewart's Knob Mountain and are steeply sloped. The elevation of these properties ranges from 1500 feet to 2000 feet at the top of the ridge. In comparison, the elevation of houses in Falling Creek ranges from 1220 feet to 1560 feet. The property is wooded in its entirety. The lower elevations are covered with numerous large hardwoods while the upper elevations are covered with smaller hardwoods and old, unproductive fruit trees. These upper elevations appear to have been deforested at some time in the distant past, possibly from timbering or forest fire. 3. Access - There is currently no public road access to this property. The lower portions of both properties border the private road known as Laurel Glen Road. The subdivision of this property will not be allowed until public road access is acquired. B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 1. Use - Petitioner has not proffered a concept plan. The concept plan submitted with the rezoning application depicts the land being subdivided into 47 house lots for single family detached dwelling units. Based on staff review of this concept plan, final densities could be higher or lower. 2. Land Use Impacts - As noted above, the land is mountainous and steeply sloped. Based on the concept plan submitted with the application, seven or eight of the house sites could impact the ridgeline of the mountain. The rear property lines of those sites go to the top of the ridgeline. Current zoning ordinance regulations require a 35'and 25' rear property setback in the AG-3 and AR districts respectively, and restricts the height of all structures to 45 feet. The land is heavily wooded. The proposed development, with the use of private septic systems and public roads on steeply sloped terrain, will necessitate the removal of a significant amount of the existing tree cover. This could result in soil 2 ~~ erosion concerns and visual impacts from the Blue Ridge Parkway and surrounding neighborhoods. 3. TrafficjCirculation - Access to this proposed development is shown on the concept plan from the upper terminus of Toddsbury Drive in the Falling Creek subdivision. Petitioner proposes to acquire rights-of-way through two properties situated at the end of Toddsbury Drive. This will be the only ingress and egress from the proposed development. According to the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT). the proposed development will result in an additional 470 vehicle trips per day on Toddsbury Drive. Toddsbury currently serves 63 homes - using the same traffic multiplier, the current traffic count would be 630 vehicle trips per day. The impact of the traffic resulting from the proposed development, could be more significant because all of the "new" traffic will be traversing the entire length of the existing street. In comments received from VDOT, it was noted that Toddsbury Drive was not constructed for this additional level of traffic, and thus, the proposed development will make Toddsbury Drive substandard. In other words, had the additional traffic on Toddsbury been planned from the beginning, Toddsbury Drive would had to have been constructed to a Category III level. Instead, the lower portions were constructed to a Category III while the upper portions were constructed to Category II and I. In addition, VDOT commented that due to the steepness of the terrain, there have been maintenance problems on the existing streets due to drainage. VDOT expressed concern that the new development could further aggravate this situation. 4. Public Services - Petitioner is proposing to develop this property with public water and private septic. Water will be available from the existing Town of Vinton water system in Falling Creek. Petitioner is planning on installing a water tank near the top of the development at approximately elevation 1850 feet - the highest elevation of the property being 2000 feet. In discussions with staff, the petitioner noted that a 20,000 gallon tank would be installed similar to those that are in Falling Creek. On site visit, staff calculates those tanks to be approximately 25-30' in height. Gregory Secrist, Town Engineer has commented that when the Town of Vinton acquired the water system from the Falling Creek developers they had to install additional pumping facilities to boost water delivery and pressure. The Town has agreed to work with Akfer Corporation in extending the water service to any new development as long as the existing system as a whole will not be negatively impacted. 3 ~~~ The proposed use of septic tanks and fields will necessitate the removal of significant numbers of trees and vegetation. This in turn may contribute to soil erosion problems. Although public sewer is not currently available to the residents of Falling Creek, and to this proposed development, it will hopefully be available in the near future. As you are aware, Mr. Steve Musselwhite is working with the National Park Service and the County to obtain a sewer right-of-way permit from the Blue Ridge Parkway for land situated to the immediate east of Falling Creek. In arrangements with the National Park Service and the Town of Vinton, the sewer lines put in to serve the Musselwhite property will be "over-sized" in order to also serve Falling Creek if, and when, their septic tanks fail. C. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The proposed development is in an area designated as Rural Preserve. This designation is intended to afford a high level of protection to rural, farmland and wooded areas while allowing a limited, very low density residential pattern. The Comprehensive Plan also identifies the petitioner's property as being an area with critical slopes - slopes exceeding 20$. The proposed development is not in conformance with the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. The density proposed is approximately 1-1/2 units per acre while the Comprehensive Plan recommends a density of 1 unit per 5 acres. D. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS Site plan review will be required. The concept plan submitted with the rezoning application does not meet the subdivision regulations in their entirety. 4 T~ PART III STAFF CONCLUSIONS It is staff's recommendation that the current AG-3 zoning be maintained for the following reasons: 1. The rezoning request is not in conformance with the County Comprehensive Plan. This area is designated Rural Preserve with critical slopes. The Comprehensive Plan recommends densities of 1 unit per 5 acres while the AR zoning district allows densities 7 times greater than that. 2. The properties in question contain steep slopes - some as high as 50~ slope. Slopes of these magnitudes require significant grading and cut-and-fill operations in order to develop road networks and construct homes. This will result in significant tree loss and soil erosion problems. The AG-3 district, with it's low densities, is specifically designed to minimize these issues. 3. As shown on the petitioner's concept plan, as many as eight house lots extend to the top of the mountain ridge line. Under a worse case scenario, multi-story houses could be constructed 25 feet below the ridgelines. This would result in significant degradation of scenic resources in that area of the County. 4. The proposed development, with private septic systems, will necessitate the removal of significant portions of the existing tree cover on these sites. This will exacerbate the visual impacts and soil and erosion problems on site. 5. The densities allowed in the AG-3 district are the maximum that should be allowed on this property unless the clustering of residential units is utilized. By clustering, the developer could take advantage, by maximizing densities, of those portions of this property that are the most developable (i.e., less severe slopes) while avoiding the areas that are the most difficult to develop. 5 • • • COUNTY OF ROANO~KE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.O. Box 29800 % Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 For staff use on/y date rec •ved~/~~ received by: ~r / appti pti n~~: ~i ps ~~ PCiBZA ate ~, placards.is ued: BOS date• Case Number: /~.' ~-"~ ~: ~_ ~P Check type of application filed (check all that apply): ® REZONING ^ SPECIAL USE ~VAR~IANCE Applicant's name: Phone: Address: Akfer Corporation 890-3603 c/o Julian Ferguson 41 72 Toddsbury Dr - Vinton Zip Code: 241 79 Owner's name: hone: fG ~•3.Z12 Don F. Gross (Property Optioned to Akfer CorpQ Address: Route 5, Box 82 Covington Virginia Zip Code: 24426 Location of property: At the end of Toddsbur Dri Tax Map Number: 51.0 3 -1 -1 & 51 .0 3 -1 - 2 y ve and adjacent to Lots 22 & 23 Magisterial District: Vinton Magisterial Dist. Falling Creek Estates n Laurel Road Community Planning Area: Size of parcel {s); Existing Zoning: AG 3 ~R 4 acres Existing Land Use: Vacant Woodland sq.ft. ~ ~ ~ . • • - Proposed Zoning: • Proposed Land Use R Argricultural/Residential District ~For staff Use Only Single Family Dwelling, detached use Type: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES X NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES x NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO X 't``- _ Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v ws v ws v Consultation 8 1 /2" x 11 " concept plan Application fee Application Metes and bounds description ~ Proffers, if applicable Justification Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners /hereby certify that l am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner. Owner's Signature: ~iiB~ _ _ „~, ~~' . _ ,,,, . . .. ~pplicant _ Akfer Corporation The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as passible. Use additional space if necessary. (Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoninq Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE A lease explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County ..:omprehensive Plan. The project as proposed does not conform to the general guidelines and policies. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE B G • SCHEDULE A The property is wooded and located on a sheltered bowl-shaped area on the side of Stewart Knob. The Development will be a continuation of Falling Creek Estates and Toddsbury Drive located to the Southwest which facilitate the creation of a convenient, attractive and harmon- ious community. The Tract contains 69 acres more or less by deed and is to be divided into approximately 47 lots for an average area of 1.0 to 1.5 acres per lot, depending upon true area by survey, thus preserving a rural feel for the neighborhood. The adjoining property ~s well as the subject property itself is relatively steep thus precluding any reasonable use as farm land and eliminating the natural conflict which seems to be a part of a residential\farm land mix. Location of the property provides for easy access to Route 24, a four lane highway. Existing water lines in Falling Creek Estates will be extended into the new Development with a new storage tank which will afford better fire protection for the new residents as well as some residents which are located below this project who are currently on a pump\pressure type system. The property is located well above any flood plains. This development will-provide for such needed housing in this area of Roanoke County and will provide for adequate light, air, conven- ience of access, and safety from fire, flood and other dangers. • ~~ • SCHEDULE B The property will be changed from woodland to a low density resi- dential neighborhood. The appearance of the property will change very little as viewed from the Blue Ridge Parkway located approximately one mile to the West. No development will take. place on or near the ridgelines which would conflict with them visually. The property located immediately to the Southwest is Falling Creek Estates. The ~roperty which will be section 8 of Falling Creek Estates will be ower density than previous sections of Falling Creek Estates. The property to the North is woodland and lies across a ridge from the project. The property to the East is woodland and is owned by the City of Roanoke Water Company. The Falling Creek reservoir is located on this particular tract, however, is across a ridge from this project. The properties to the Southeast, mostly wooded, are large residential tracts and with the exception of property owned by Edward Hale is across Laural Glenn Road (a private road}. The properties located to the Southwest and down hill from the project are large acreage wooded tracts. Each proposed lot will be serviced with public water and individual sewage disposal systems. The new public water system will correct the low pressure problems that some homes in Falling Creek Estates have and will provide for fire protection for some existing homes. The property is located 1.6 miles from Route 24 which provides easy access to schools, parks, jobs and emergency services. ~~ CONCEPT PLAN FOR ~^ ~ • SECTION 8 FALL /NG CREEK ESTATES DEYEc OPER: AXFER CORPORA T / ON -- ~ ~ ..~ \ ~ --~/ -~ ~ \ \ / AOgM auL/f rcwA n Atr / ~ ~r. n.Ai-/-/ 4 \ \ /~ ~ \\ .~ / \ /600 / M rr. C.M ~ - - ~ ~/ ` ~ % ~i~~~.,~ ~~~ e i• a ~\ ., ,, ~~, •' / 1 ~; r to ~ k ~r ~ s ~A Lry r \ r /' J/ LiC. AMC. K. /C `~ _ ~~ ( ~ ... a t - -,f.. ~ ~t ~ ~ ~ F LIi c.. \y \`J/ ` ~ Uf ~ / Lr l/ t 7/ A Lry r / /. 'rA`' a err oz toc o. • ! Lr _ / _ -- /./ Ac. A.J ~ % AZ. ` r err. f/ IJ-IS~ / ` / A/ S! / tt / r A / M/L/I L. i//L7. 1. L iI // r.r. p. a-s-a. / ~ • / ~ fA ~a Ac LA4M .E{M a Ar ~ AILAr fwrrfa IAr7ir .I AC ~~ %.K f~ i-f ANTEJ: L 1 ~~ s~ /. ALL AD./0/N/AMf IRO/ERT/fJ \ A ~CT/~N S,AFALL/~ EEC ESTATEJ \` ~ • ~~ J ~` I I. d10(Ai0 C10YDP COAfS/JTJ W/KT ~. ~ Ar ~ t OF FOREST. r.r. f /. / rr. s wrt-//w~t i • Ac JGLf: / • - •00 Ad~E+ ItvfG7/ 2?. /99S Ar I / N // / / / / • ~,,. ._ TOWN OF VINTON P. O. BOX 338 VINTON, VIRGINIA 24179 PHONE (703) 983-Q648 GREGORY B. SECRIST, P.E. FAX (703) 983-0621 ASSISTANT TOWN MANAGER/ ENGINEER March 23, 1995 Mr. Julian Ferguson 4172 Toddsbury Lane Vinton, VA 24179 RE: Falling Creek Water System Expansion Dear Mr. Ferguson: As per your request, I am writing a letter to confirm an agreement between the Town of Vinton and yourself to connect to the Falling Creek water system providing water supply for approximately 48 new residential dwellings near the existing end of Toddsbury Lane in Roanoke County. . This agreement is of course conditional upon you providing an engineering analysis and design of the water system and confirming that any new supply demand will not exceed the safe supply capacity of the system. The final design of the water distribution system must be reviewed and approved by the Town, meet our specifications, and be acceptable by the Virginia Department of Health. I hope that this suffices in showing good faith from the Town of Vinton to work with you in providing water services to your proposed development. Please call me if you have any questions regarding this matter. Sincerely, ~. ~0 Gregory B. Secrist, P.E. Assistant Town Manager/ Engineer cc: Clay Goodman, Town Manager Cecil Stacy, Public Works Director • w~c •,[`~ `s __ ~ - RCANCKc CCU _~ . ~~r ?~ ~, ~~ t` P l ~ w n'(1' ~~ ~... ~, VICINITY MAP /1) /// .- - _ -- ~ _ - - ri J ~1 r.f.! _- IJO y~';' v 1 ~ =f~ ~~ ~ f C rn ~i z ~_ -. •cs[w.ci• a' e~ r' ~ nu i ,~ / ~./ ~=_~. ,:. ~N ' :V ,. s~ ~ T-s NORTH ~ ` ~ ~ c` ~ o -~'~y ,d ~~-~~: I mat P~ ~, n I xn.. Mti~/ (Mry / / Ol ~~ ~E~~ ~r°" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JUNE 27, 1995 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 68.4 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED BEYOND THE TERMINUS OF TODDSBURY DRIVE TO THE EAST (TAX MAP NOS. 51.03-1-1 AND 51.03-1-2) IN THE VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF AG-3 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF AR WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF ARFER CORPORATION WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on April 25, 1995, and the second reading and public hearing were held May 23, 1995, and continued to June 27, 1995; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on May 2, 1995; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 68.4 acres, as described herein, and located beyond the terminus of Toddsbury Drive to the east, (Tax Map Numbers 51.03-1-1 and 51.03-1-2) in the Vinton Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of AG-3, Agricultural/Rural Preserve District, to the zoning classification of AR, Agricultural/Residential District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Akfer Corporation. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Tax Map No. 51.03-1-1 - BEGINNING at a post on the Lawhorn 1 ~'"" " line; thence S. 51 deg. 15' W. 163.5 feet to an iron pipe near a large rock on the side of a gully; thence S. 3 deg. E. 743 feet to a white oak on a ridge; thence S. 32 deg. E. 550 feet passing an iron pin in the bottom of a hollow to a poplar near a rock; thence S. 65 deg. E. 223 feet to an iron pin in the center of the Vinton-Roanoke Water Company road passing a red oak near the edge of road; thence with the center of said road N. 57 deg. E. 60 feet; thence N. 39 deg. 39' E. 177.8 feet; thence N. 49 deg. 30' E. 167 feet to the Baker line; thence with said Baker line N. 4 deg. 45' W. 780 feet, more or less, to a post corner to Lawhorn land; thence with said Lawhorn line, N. 57 deg. 51' W. 247.2 feet to a stone; thence N. 53 deg. 6' W. 180 feet to a white oak; thence N. 47 deg. 8' W 197 feet to a post at the place of beginning, and containing 19.407 acres, more or less, according to a survey made by C. M. Stancliff, Certified Surveyor. Tax Map No. 51.03-1-2 - BEGINNING at a double chestnut oak on side of mountain and off from same a new line S. 47 deg. 30' E. 53.08 poles to a white oak; thence N. 53 deg. 30' E. 11.52 poles to a stone; thence S. 58 deg. 15' E. 16.80 poles to a point near a small branch (the remainder of the description being copied from the original description in the deed from James Gardner to Jno. R. Hannabas, with the courses as follows:) thence N. 88 deg. -- 29.52 poles to a point; S. 54 deg. 30' E. 18 poles to the road; thence with the road N. 89 deg. E. 9 1/16 poles to a point; N. 59 deg. 15' E. 19 poles to the middle of the road; thence leaving the road N. 13 deg. 15' W. 32 poles to a hickory; N. 82 deg. 45' E. 60 poles; N. 30 deg. 15' W. 11.64 poles; S. 58 deg. 45' W. 75 poles to the beginning, at a double chestnut oak. The above description of land contains 49 acres, more or less, but the land is sole in gross and not by the acre. 4. That the owner has voluntarily proferred, in writing, the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors accepts: (1) The developer of this property shall, at their sole expense, provide an additional asphalt surface overlayed along the entire length of the existing Toddsbury Drive. This new asphalt surface shall have a thickness of one and one half inches (1.5") on those portions of Toddsbury Drive between the intersection of Falling Creek Drive and Burnt Quarter Drive (lower intersection). The remaining portions of Toddsbury Drive from Burnt Quarter Drive (lower intersection) to its present cul-de-sac terminus shall be overlayed with an additional two inches (2") of asphalt surface. These improvements to Toddsbury shall be completed prior to Roanoke County and the Virginia Department of Transportation, accepting for maintenance, any new streets in Falling Creek Section 8. 2 ~`~ (2) No structure proposed for construction within the 68.4 acres shall have a base floor elevation of greater than 1820 feet above sea level. All future subdivision plats for this 68.4 acres shall contain covenant restrictions limiting the base floor elevations to 1820 feet or less. All applicants for building permits for new structures shall provide an engineering certification that the structure proposed has a base floor elevation of 1820 feet or less. (3) All lots shall be served by public water. Any water tank constructed shall be located such that the top of the tank shall not extend above the ridgeline of the property. Any water tank constructed shall be painted in a dark or muted color. (4) No more than 47 residential lots shall be platted on the 68.4 acres. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. zoning.akfer 3 r AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 27, 1995 r ~~ L ORDINANCE 62795-12 DENYING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO JIM WALTER HOMEB, INC. TO BUILD A CONSTRUCTION STORAGE YARD ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ROUTE 200 AND VA 674, (TAX PARCEL 88.03-1-1.1.), CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DIS- TRICT WHEREAS, Jim Walter Homes, Inc. has filed a petition to build a construction storage yard on the southeast corner of Route 220 and VA 674 in the Cave Spring Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on June 6, 1995; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on May 23, 1995; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on June 27, 1995. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: On motion of Supervisor Minnix to deny the special use permit, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: Supervisor Kohinke A COPY TESTE: /`y~'~~ Brenda J. Ho ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney ~~.tm .,,,~ 2rs3L O + RD. QL~ ~S 766 ~~i~~` O ~ 3 .~ j ~ y Norlin ~ r-r ~Q~ ~M ~ ~ J OJ~,~fi7~ /fi~ ..c 0827 / // ~, I I 804 INTERa1 NE~~ ~ ~/A~ Ct BRGOK b' / rt' -- Y ll ~_ZO` `PO- T s~ R .~ c RWOOC ACRt~/~ `"4 tp,~ Ro'~~ rR£57A u ` 674 ~~'. a 4 ~ ~. t ~+A~*' ( VICINITY MAP ~ !6751 Clear~rooii ``Y ~ ~ fi=b NORTH -~ ,~. ------ e - - yart ~ xv Is '~.' ~ ' 1!/ ' ~ ~.. 21 a:oa L 13 ~ ~ , ~ 18 : K ~' ' S~ / IB r LO~x IL92 x + ~ ' 20 -~ 9 21 22 :". ..~ n _ Ity ae,01 'A y:x 229x ~ o~sa°" ,. 19 Le1Ae y,r `. + Iylxlel .~~~ 22 '~ ~ s.o i•sY+'a 19.1 • 11 x is+e ~6~x •'' Xv Lvc+ ' aQO :. ~ S y7yl H 2 = ~ ~' ~ 29 - yi.e t2 • •y2N 27 . •r~ 101x ~ liai 9.7y Sc .a 34 O •r • t.l7x ~/ assx .-• ~ _ yr ~ 30 ~ ~• 31 >,K 3S IOOac ` 2b •r c tAOx ~ ~~11 3 aov ... 9 Izsx ~ IOSx ~' ~ ac ` loot cl3 b ~I t , 31 / a77• 73x10 p , 36 .- / r ~.4 . ^ -+ a 34 aaa.7 ` •34 ~ ` l .•'g1~ .~ t eox •1 axe 3oa arA7 _ U!x '~ ~ \ i3jY - 41 ~ - LSOx 17 + ~' i \ ~ 6 ti s~ ~ xi. 3 ~ 8 • Ja>Q \ ~'\ 2.3sx 4.1 ayes+61A ~•.~A ~3 ••.. \ 7....r \ ¢ LIS Ac •4. Ac \ ~ ;.`'goy ad'r \• ,44 . .SAS aN7 '~_ ~• 1~2 ~ \ ara+ 4S i 6 tisx 1 ~92AC Zy 2.114 aW ~ 7 4Z,y~ ~ ` ` ~ 46 \ 1 O x101 yii. . 77 J~ ` Laz.+e t es xlCt 1.77Ae ~ ~ .,...•..~ ~ ; ,yw • wens ~...». •.. ' 39zx ~, r r.'..' 1 s ay1l V ~.. ` I \ \ SO ~ I.il ~ ..~ 7g 75 ~ •~. LOOnc w 1 pAc °,, fd1Nr, SGkd eats ~ L19 x °,~ \ •• :\ / 1 ~ \ 3 „ ~ 9.P•1 ~.e. R°swe•• Carry .~ ~ ~ I~l/ ~c 1 ~~ IT.I /~ q s~.yyAe [II 75.I ~ °~~' t 1 -~ y 2 ~ l22 Ae/ /~~J{ 7~SAC ~c .~ - S.91sc 762Ae ? ~~ ~ y° ~ ?; .~ y°23 t`o ~` 74 \ •.v O/ 4 a ;OC• ~,~ I.i6A ~ wces. 1 e, ! Ly0Ac101 yt,, ~ 1.9Ae 4 ~ ` • '~, LIZ AeC'. r' s !•' al67 ~~\ A~ I G:9:e 2 • :°~ l2lAe S `:.\ .7yyf Y•• 1 '33 78. ''•ti'~~ wees~ J i~ 3'' : a ° \ 9 •+ . •:\ I.~aeml r 19?:c Jy .s ~' 10 ~: • L.a9t'c KI . 6 ~ 71 r7fll !1~ r •s7x / . 4.•/ ~ `'+ .II~•~~~'=.: :~ .off ~ I tnsc 783 , • 1 V '~o •., ~r .. -• 1 _ y~sa i r 2 0 °o + ~ ~ :.. O LI7Ae 'y 4 2.7ece yl0 ~ \ r, 13 \ ,39- ~~ ?J7J ~ ~ . ~- .129x ~, _ , ~ \ ~~ - ! 44 ~ 69.1 .S w6 .~ ~•~. J ......n,.. 21• lw. r+. v y~ IOSAC101 ~yU ~`. \ µ ' 1.74A [. •" s. 9'c At ICI . .f• !•!• ~ sror 8 "•y ti \ .. y. 2.OOi-c ICI j ys a $ ,45.- - ~ ~ •. `~. / e / .... ~,• ~ • •~ JIM WALTER HOMES INC. _ DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING TAX # 88.03-1-1.1 • AND ZONING lr ~ •. . ,.. . T- I~ PETITIONER: JIM WALTER HOMES CASE NUMBER: 17-5/95 Planning Commission Hearing Date: May 2, 1995 (CONY) June 6, 1995 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: June 27, 1995 A. REQUEST Petition of Jim Walter Homes Inc. for a Special Use Permit to build a construction storage yard on the southeast corner of Route 220 and VA 674, Cave Spring Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS Clarence Simmons, president of the Clearbrook Civic League, expressed the following concerns: developing the site will increase flooding; truck traffic on Clearbrook Lane. J. M. Miller said that he is concerned with the traffic; there is no room for tractor trucks to turn without creating a hazard. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION In response to the Commission, staff said that VDOT is aware that 18-wheelers would be using this entrance. D. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS 1) The construction yard shall be located approximately as shown on the concept plan. 2) Every effort will be made to construct a right turn lane for northbound traffic. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Witt stated that he shares some of the traffic concerns expressed by the residents; however, the site is not suited for residential use and at some time the property will be developed for commercial use. He moved to recommend approval of the petition with the recommended conditions. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Thomason, Hooker, Witt, Ross, Robinson NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: Concept Plan _ Staff Report _ Vicinity Map Other Terrance Ha ngtc Roanoke unty P Commission • STAFF REPQRT PETITIONER: Jim Walter Homes, Inc CASE NUMBER: 17-5/95 PART I • A. ERECUTIVE SUMIViARY B. DESCRIPTION "(= b PREPARED BY: David Holladay DATE: 5/2/95 Jim Walter Homes, Inc. wishes to relocate their business from Salem to the Clearbrook section of Roanoke County. The business consists of a model home sales park with a structure for offices and warehouse storage of construction materials. The construction yard aspects of the business requires application for a Special Use Permit. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Construction yards are allowed in the Village Center zoning district by Special Use Permit with the following Use and Design Standards: 1. The maintenance and repair of all vehicles and equipment shall be conducted within an enclosed building. 2. In considering a special use permit request for a construction yard, the commission may consider and set standards for the following: a. The provisions for screening of any vehicles, equipment, materials and storage yard, and screening and buffering, in accordance with Section 30-92, of the entire construction yard. b. The maximum height of any structure and any additional setback requirements necessary to compensate for any increased height. c. Specific measures to control dust on the site. d. Specific levels of noise permitted on the site, as measured at adjacent property lines. e. Limit the hours of operation. Site plan review will be required prior to issuing a building permit to ensure compliance with County ordinances. Entrance permit will be required by VDOT. • ' • PART II A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS ~ Location -The site is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Route 674 (Clearbrook Lane) and U.S. 220 (Franklin Road) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. Topography/Vegetation -Topography is flat. Scattered grasses cover most of the property, and portions of the lot were graveled in the past. All of the property appears to lie within the 100 year flood plain, which will dictate finished floor or fill elevations. The property frontage contains/adjoins a tributary of Back Creek and appears to lie within the FEMA floodway. For this proposal, permitted uses allowed in the floodway are limited to accessory uses such as yard areas, parking and loading areas, etc. Surrounding Neighborhood -All adjacent properties are zoned AV. Surrounding land uses on the east side of U.S. 220 include Moducraft Homes, Wexford Stables, and offices for Roanoke Land and Auction. Land uses across U.S. 220 include a Weaver Weaver Vascik and Kleiner Pediatric Neurosurgery, the Clearbrook Fire & Rescue Station, Clearbrook Internal Medicine and Clearbrook Elementary School. B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site I-avout/Architecture - The enclosed preliminary concept plan, which has not been proffered, shows five model homes and a structure for offices and construction material storage. The office/storage building includes a 1600 square foot outside storage area that is screened and under roof. The remaining 3200 square foot building includes approximately 800 square feet of office space, with the remaining 2400 square feet used as warehouse space. Additional information about the proposed operation is included with the preliminary concept plan. No architectural plans have been submitted. Access - The concept plan shows two proposed entrances from Clearbrook Lane. Clearbrook Lane crosses the Back Creek Tributary via gone-lane bridge with a steel frame and timber decking. Currently no weight limits are posted at the bridge, but a confirmation of the bridge weight limits is recommended. The bridge was last inspected by VDOT on April 2, 1994. Traffic Circulation -Traffic counts in the vicinity are as follows: Old Rocky Mount Road to Blue Ridge Parkway - 27,228 (1994) Route 419 to Rocky Mount - 21,000 (1993) Fire Rescue/Utilities - No impact to Fire and Rescue. The nearest water connection is 1450 feet from the site. Sewer service is n of available. - • ' C. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN . ` ~~" The request conforms generally with the guidelines of the Villa e Center land use designation' g b of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. Policy VC-4 encourages retail and personal service establishments to develop at crossroad locations. D. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD The request is allowed through Special Use Permit in the Village Center zoning district. Site plan review is required and will ensure conformance with applicable development standards. Location and limits of floodplain and floodway will affect site design. PART III STAFF CONCLUSIONS The request is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The site lies within the Village Center area, where more intensive development is encouraged. As per the Use and Design Standards for construction yards in the AV district, the commission may consider and set standards for the following: a. The provisions for screening of any vehicles, equipment, materials and storage yard, and screening and buffering, in accordance with Section 30-92, of the entire construction yard. b. The maximum height of any structure and any additional setback requirements necessary to compensate for any increased height. c. Specific measures to control dust on the site. d. Specific levels of noise permitted on the site, as measured at adjacent property lines. e. Limit the hours of operation. Some of the above issues were mentioned in the letter which accompanies the preliminary concept plan. Two additional issues which may need further discussion and consideration by the Planning Commission are the Clearbrook Lane bridge and the floodplain/floodway. If these two issues, and those mentioned in the use and design standards are properly addressed, staff supports a favorable recommendation for the Special Use Permit. PREPARED BY: DAVID HOLLADAY DATE: May 2, 1995 i ~ ~-r~ M ~Mo TO: Planning Commission FROM: David Holladay DATE: June 2, 1995 SUBJECT: Jim Walter Homes, Special Use Permit continuation Please see the attached copy of the letter from George Igoe, VDOT, dated 5/15/95. After further evaluation, comments from VDOT were revised to "concur with the proposal to locate the entrance of this business off Route 674". Aright turn lane on northbound 220 was suggested as beneficial. As of this date, no discussions have taken place between VDOT and Jim Walter Homes, Inc. to address the feasibility of a right turn lane. F Also attached is a copy of a survey by Balzer & Assoc., dated 5/8/95, showing approximate locations of floodway lines on the property. According to Paul Hare, local manager for Jim Walter Homes, Inc., the current owner of the property questions the location of the floodway lines. i• ~~ :7 • DAVID R. GEHR COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 714 SOUTH BROAD STREET SALEM, 24153-5127 May 15, 1995 ~_`"~'''~°`'= ~= { ~v~i•i y. A. ECHOES REStOENT ENGINEER P. 0. Box 3071 Salem, VA 24153 Terry L. Harrington Planning S Zoning County of Roanoke P. 0. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Re: Jim Walter Homes, Inc; Special Use Permit Dear Terry: As an addendum to my comments of April 19, 1995, for the above captioned subject, a field review has influenced me t~o ali:er my comment -concerning access to Route 220: The crossover at Route 674 has an existing turn lane, while the next turnover South does not. This may create a hazardous situation for southbound customers turning left into the proposed business. Therefore, this office concurs with the proposal to locate the entrances to this business off Route 674. A right turn lane for northbound traffic turning onto Route 674 would be most beneficial, particularly for delivery trucks turning onto Route 674. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, /j', c~; ~ r ~-~ George R. Igoe `~~ b b Highway Permits F Subdivision Specialist Senior for J. A. Echols Resident Engineer gri /sip i ~~~ . SAry iwy' ~,. ~:. SQ Wd' ~ • j ;i ~~~1~Ifli~l~~~L~'I~ of VIR~I~TI~``'•.-~Y f 8 iJj -~~~ TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY Jti ~ ,l~S ~O a ~\ n1'ET 1Li. r.~' l~I r.l. Nbrur)nrJ: 'u. •.r ~. ... n.~. •~. . ar:.. gyn... • CflUUti'U t7GV.~10l:S'IC~~2.Q' rUw)VI; hl,~y, I',nIN I'Ih1'.YI'Inn cc E~ Ra,4ook .~.a•v~ R r. ~ ~~ ~ ~ ,~~ 1 ,~i ,~ / Lx : 1~1Hj 2 •,,- l l~ , -' '1 q, ,.• B 10 / \ p.Y, ~) ~ 5,1 p 1•' ' 1'/ ~ ~~ ~' '" B / , ' ~-t ~/ ~ ; - j~ 7 cn w ,i ,~ ,,~ ~ f ~I• ~ , cn ~ ~~ i : i ,,~ a, X ,II ~~:rJr' ~ ~ ' ~' ~ ~' •~ , 1 ff~f ~ 3 • f ~ lh o . ~,' ,. : ~ ,.'~ 1 Z. O~~%,/~/ ~ ' / 0 ~ ' ~• ,.~ ,: o ~= ,~' rb~ r''•/ ~ N S, W , C~'' ~ .rte j~ ~. ~' ~i~ r iP~:I:h7~ h:. r~:r.,,n•, td<lA')at ha.F:VATIQ~ N ~ 1•:I I ~ ,, ~ .~~ N ~b ~ ~ ~ 1 •~ r~.t~ i~hrz71 ~a,•:, 1,~1;rlrrtn,) ::P1KF. ![~ 4JF~T 511>R ul I~ ti;ut n,l !• i't'+~-"t/1-b5: SUl1CdFASf OF r):,,~•:rrl lnn nh' ::rn•rh: R:WIt: i66 ~rtn U. :. hl1'~,~ ~ti :j:,r:,,I C ,i r-~4rra+x,n~rs ~, ~i>^i ,cF•)~yl SIK7~JING 1•:.t -1INc: t.k:N1N1) I'7,F.YA'i'IONSt PlfJUI) 1'IAIN r•l.h.t'nl Imt:: nNlt '1Nt: REYlU1RFIi F'IIJ. t:. rnl:•1. IIiF :•t l!.:.11' ntYtV$ 11iB F1~tiU P1A1N I(I fVATiOA'S ~~..~r! r :,I nn•: I~)Jt(11(AS1' IATF.RSfi::T1QN cH~ ' .:. I: ~ . :.'u MU t:IJ'A)tllR;M L1:4h: ..~cr ::rl:tt`: M~lr:1j1'F]tL11. f)iS771CT e•.Hn,a:P ttA)n'fl', VIRGLYin a:).v,•'Yhtr t•,~': M, 197; ? rr . Ju ~- , op r'~a\1=!•1•'1'11 pf; ,~C) ~a~ ~.~ j :, QHN R. McADE t .5•a=9S ~~~11 YUIt`fk',~t lilt: V1,1'dtt:'f '); ~___ .:o _,SO I ~r11.l_ JUUSr. .. /o° ) tt~,L~LR j~l7D t,nttt,C)'nyfA, IHC., 2808 CURPOR)1TY.. C7AC].T.', AOANC'KY, V7Rt3TNiA 2 f•• 4 ~ ~ LC'~ d NHOZJ S:9J.H 1 ~OSSIi +~ L13Z'7tiB B S = 6 Q9M ~6-t T -.s.ti W ---END»-- 7'1-~~--.-~. i., -, ~, ~- - ~' -rte - t ~-_,._.._--.-~- ..-- - ~- ^ ~liillWa/few HOMES INC. P.0. Box 1045 • 100 Wildwood Foad Phone 703-389-4871 t-800-223-2752 SALE hi, VIFGINIA c';153 • GENERAL INFORMATION ON JWH NEW MODEL PARK 1. We receive an average of 2-3 tractor-trailer deliveries a month. 2. We make approximately S-6 deliveries a week with a standard flat bed stock truck. 3. The only pieces of equipment stored and/or used on site are a tow motor, which is used strictly to load/unload the delivery trucks, and the stock truck itself. 4. Only a limited quantity of selected construction materials are to be stored on site. Materials include doors, windows, siding, nails, shingles, etc. No unsightly or otherwise obtrusive materials are kept on-site. All other materials needed for the construction of our homes are purchased from and supplied by off-site vendors. 5. Short of routine model maintenance, no other construction activities take place on-site of operation. 6. The normal hours of operation for the model park are: • 8:00 am - 8:00 pm Monday -:Friday 8:00 am - 6:00 pm Saturday 1:00 pm - 6:00 pm Sunday The warehouse is generally open: 7:00 am - 6:00 pm Monday - Friday 7:00 am - 12:00 noon on Saturday If any other questions and/or concerns should surface, please call me at 703-389-7264. Sincerely, Paul Hare Branch Manager • t~ • ~~ Y at W. R:i,• r ~^ .. ., Y.. ' ~.. ~: ~r_ ~, .. K~ .~~ _ ?. i .j,, . i 3 r1 j Fr. r... jL ~; k:, t'~ ;: ,` ~° ~' . E ,; ~:. ~I . .. .j . V . ~ . k ~~ z ~1 s 0 r COUNTY OF ROANOKE • DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 For staff use only date received•~ / n J received by: applicatio ee: / ~/1 PC/BZA d •~ ,cj < I placards i s e ~ i BOS date: Case tuber: / ~~ ~/~j~_ Check type of application filed (check all that apply): D REZONING ®SPECIAL USE OVARIANCE Applicant's name: JIM WALTER HOMES, INC. Phone: 703-389-7264 Address: 100 Wildwood Road, Salem, Virginia Zip Code:24153 Owner's name: F. EARL FRITH Phone:703-774-5263 Address: 5249 Clearbrook Ln Roanoke, Va. Zip Code: Location of property: Tax Map Number: 88.03 ~ 1. 1 Corner of U. S. Rt. 220&Va.Sec. Rte. 674 Magisterial District: ve 'n Community Planning Area: Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: Agricultural Village 2.86 acres Existing Land Use: None 124.800 sq.ft. ....... Proposed Zoning: No change Proposed Land Use: Construction material storage (warehouse) ............................. For sraff Use only Use Type: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES X NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES x NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO ......................... ......................................... Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v ws v ws v Consultation 8 1 /2" x 11 " concept plan Application fee Application ;< Metes and bounds description '~~: Proffers, if applicable Justification ~~`~` Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners /hereby certify that / am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner. ' wp ~°9 J Owner's Signature: Applicant JIM WALTER HOMES, INC. - The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. This proposas is generally consistant with the surrounding development and provides goods and services that are in support of the rural emphasis carried within the agricultural village zoning classification. Besides, the warehouse/office area in question is but a small part of the overall activity of the site. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. Again, this special use request pertaining to the warehouse/office is strictly for the support of our business, which is building single family homes. Our primary customers are in rural country. As this area directly supports the overall activity of building homes, it directly supports the sense of community identity that comes from continued rural growth and expansion. • ROAHOKE COQNTY UTILITY DEPARTHBNT APPLICATION FOR WATER OR SEWER SERVICE TO PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Date 3-23-95 Name of Applicant JIM WALTER HOMES, INC. Phone 703-389-7264 Address Of Applicant 100 Wildwood Road, Salem, Virginia 24153 Name of Developer JIM WALTER HOMES, INC. phone 703-389-7264 Address of Developer 100 Wildwood Road, Salem, Virginia 24153 Name of Design Engineer JIM WALTER HOME, INC. Phone Address of Design Engineer 1500 North Dale Mabry, Tampa Florida 33607 Name of Contact Person GREG HARDMAN Name of Proposed Development JIM WALTER HOMES MODEL PARK 7~ Type of Development and proposed number of units (Be .specific) . Model home sales vark with administration office/warehouse storage of construction _ materials Total of five (5) model homes and one(1) office/warehouse building Location of proposed development .(FURNISH COPY OF MAP AND PLPNIMETRIC NLi~IDER) Corner of U.S. Route 220 and Va. Sec. Rte. 674 Size of proposed development in acres : 2, g6• Acres Give minimum and maximum elevation (Use USGS Elevations) at which the individual water/sewer service connections would be located: Minimum +1120 feet MSL. Maximum +1150 feet MSL Is this application for a development that will be apart or section of a larger future development? X No Yes if yes, provide map of entire area if available. (OVEN) Signature of Applicant. / ,L1 C ~ - . 1 ~~ • I~ J ~ fQ \ (~ ~ ~ \ \ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ y ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ \ 27 \~ \ 39~a< \ \ \ \ ~ \;' ~ 25 N loos 1 ` ` ~ ~ 23 > 9 • 19 9 21 22 S -^ r 29 i i9, • \ a.98 ac • ,20 I \ L7: Ac r. a! ac IDI \ 30 Li2 a< 131 • 3 ~'~ ~y rT1 i. \ -i0h R3 I] aelCl 9 61 ".•q •1e ac 1r'3N ti ~, 8 4 m x.: a< S \ 1.9g a< '~ . ~~ ~~. ~R1.679 .~~ ~ \ ~• 35 • 22• 21 ~ `\, 6 `• Ig<=19 .3 \ ~G~a t I.I e I 206a< I.OOac 1 R/ f ~ 2p PROPERTY IDENTIFICATK)H MAP I R~n?~ IEG~ND MONiN ~~ [DUN1• LAN[ --- IaNCCI CONi1NUaIlON CfLCYt 41CD aGa[aG[ 1/7lICI 98A ROANOKE COUNTY VIRGINIA 1o.N L.rc - L[aav Hots No (f~ o[co acauD( Y[NfiON D rt.7um !xl 111 ® 47.D2 9e.~1 98.O2 1 ~ .~ .r-~~~ C~iT LIN[ ~ •••~ lCOal l0i MO. I I SCalCO N 111 1! fC~l[ (tOCN LIYIT LAM( - ~ - - Ia NC[l M0. 21 0[f0 OIY[NlIO lI110N . !ML(T N10(1 1••I0~ Y.I OaT(_I T"!"_- Yf Oaf TC NraI OiS r. lIN( -•'~ Ya1 OIOCN M0. OC GOONOIMaT! IOC. 10 1-a00-345-7334 I SCALE IH 1/10 OF AH INCH L~ Blue Ridge Parkway f / 0 Q ti~ • • • APPROVED pMa~ul~8/o - AGEt~1T- ROA1.10 E COL11\1TY DATE ~R1?,11NG COM1~{ISS101~ ti~ 1 219 N ~2° I 29 C7 O°~ ~~ 3 ~`' sE~_ R ~? ~• . ~ 43 74 m a~ 34? /~. m ~ 1 M O 3 o' I N ~ N O 0 w O I ~ O Z I i ~ I - ,~ 5.`~2 AG. /~ ~ 3 TRACT 3 :O 543°40 00' E ~ `5S. 54' ~A z FZ ~~ ~m T. P. PARKER ~-! Oo J ~l1~VEY R >' 2q• C!/RTIFICATE No. ~ OO•' ~t 420 _vo ' ~P~f° LAND °°~a S~CO 30Q• /O, yt ~, PROPERTY OF HOWARD L. ST. CLAIR NOTE: TI-Ii5 PL..AT l5 h;OT •THE SUBJECT PROPERTY I3 NOT EiA°_aE~ oh! A AGT IJAL FIE1_C~ WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE 100 ~ / SL.1RVHY A/JD is SuL3JECT T~ YEAR FLOOD BOUNDARY AS SHOWtl `~ IUFORMATIOu WH~cH MAY O;? THE PEHA FLOOD BOUNDARY BE D15GLOSED B`C A FIELD „Ap• THIS DETERNLNATION IS / SURVEY( j TITLE. REPORT. BASED OH TBE FLOOD BOUNDARY MAP AND HAS NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY ACTUAL FIELD ELEVATIONS. PLAT FROM RECORDS MADE FOR F EARL FRITI-I OF TRACT 1 ~ TRACT 2, ~, TRACT 3~ 51TUATE Ol~l U.S. ROUTE 220 ~ VA. SEG. RTE. ~T4 2. SCn AC. TRACT 2 U'~ ~~ N 4 I ° 10' 00 t 255.00' Fu+<c O t-gT. FR• I I O OFFICE ' O O I.oo AC:. TRACT 1 N v N 2 9z AOp 2~, i 7 tJ ~ a ~ ~ O , J O ~ Q ~ .7 ~ J CAVE SPRII~iG MAGISTERIAL DIST. ROANOKE COUNTY VIRGINIA N.B. cALC. aY: T. P. PARKER & SON scALE: y"= loo' DRAWN D. A. P. cK'D. P.W. ENGINEERS d. SURVEYORS ,LTD. DATE FEB. 28 eve r° SALEM VIRGINIA W,O, 8!o-Olra~ p_ 30202. 5 ~ i0 aa'n;~• c .~_ ~f (0.53' z oh N .~ ~ O ~~L . nI ~!~ N ,U `W 54.4° 23'00' E ~' -T8.90' ~o ~ 552°00'00' E ~9 `15.4 ~' ~ ~= b NORTH -~ ,~. -- --- o sari ~ sao ~ 23 s 15 , ~! 1_ ~ / • ~+ - w 21 aros L 13 ~ ' . 18 : K ~ Iri s/p~'~ i8 ~ IAix 11.92 sc 20 ~ R 175 x01 '~ in 29 o'~yCp?I '~19 1C14 ~yy ~ csls: fCl ~~ 229x '~22 4.99 Ae '~20s''O S:Ot '~~ :,sy<w 19 u9.1 ~ 23 4 IS x ~~~ 165x :,• Xaf / • 5R0 ~ • ~ .NO ' 19 2 .,.. % 29 ~ 12 .s ` ~ O ~'' a •5x51 12 x . a~~ 101 Ae y ~ 1r57 IC.57 k 32 ` ' y7ar ~ 30 ' ~~ I oo ac •31 yp 35 \ 28 A~ c IAOx ~ ~-tt ' S »a \ ••~ 9 ~ 25x 5~ 103x % b ~ 1 at ~ . 31 ~ / 'srs~ i4 10AC~ 73 AC K5 p 36 ~ / . ~.4 ~ e 34 Ja~7 \ '•3a o~ ..~ '40 1.80Y •1 a~oo xs szsr Ll94 'may / ~ 13jx >t \ , 33 at / 32 Fsox 17 ~ • ~ ~ / ~ 6 ~ `, M ~'• srii 33~ s 8 r '. \• 1 3 ~k , ~ 706 Ac ~ 3.~N ~ 3' ..' 42 a ~ i ` \ ~ 6 2x4 w M • ` •.\ 4.1 a` 6 \ • 43 a • ~ ~ T.. Ja7r r ~ 2.35x s5o 1A ~•'•. JtAf c• • ` ¢ LIS Ae - 2 p _v~>• Jr+s \• .44 f 4 4• AC \ .5l ~•1~pF ~ ~O ' 1 s! Ac R 45 S 6 ' j ' ` ~ S.92Ae 1:"C V \ 2.11 ae ~ TTTTTTT \ }t!I ? ' ~ 4 ~ ~ 7T 3!' \ ~ L42x Yesxtcl . s~e.ooq \ J5H 1.17x ` ACdS eater... tr ` ~ ).92x ~ a...r ` I \ ~ S \\ 6511 . / T6~J TS ~ •. LOOAC \ \ SO 1.61/ 10:fx~ }y„ ~ ~°r, Gwry SeACd BarA d 1.10 ac o~~ \~• ~ 1 • \ 3. SI ~ ,p. Raon.a, cawrry a V ~~',,t \ ~ s.COx ml ~ po0,• \ A'r \ 2 ~ IT.i qp 6.Y54 CI 75.1 11 \• l22 4/ 7.OSAC ~~ 3.91~c 762 Ac 73<,~ S - / ~ \ .s.~ ~ S~p7 .to `~ Y~ 23 ,`p ~\ 74 ` ' •.~. O~ 4 5 toox~~ ~ 1.466 • 3 112 AcC' ~' ~r T2~` e° 1 ~ i.s9-c 2 • :o 129AC S :'\ T as ; ., j4 ~ 33 ea..... i...... ySf-- • .. ~4i~ Jam: c 9, ~ 2 ~y 78. •`-'.,L~i RGBS /~v 3~' :4 ~ 9 -I.C2 sc ml ~ r' 1°_m /~ ~~~ sue' \ •• •;. •'\ L39~c ICI 6 63 6c ?I 7&3 )~~ i : j • JJ16 v ` \ qo •~ , .+t~';i' ~~ ~ r;. 40 1.17AC 'y 4 2.78.e yl~ ~ ` .ate I3 \ - 39', O JJSJ ~. ~ ' 129x C• _ , ~ 4~ . \ 69.1 • S ~ ` ~~ •' !~ 44 .:+~..~~. I "•2 ,- \w. c.. e. ",)f 1054fC1 ~ ~lu,~~. \ 14 - 1.7,A ." I 94x1C1 .~ . . <, ~af~ [. ~' . J• • i00.tc 1C1 ~ • 5~ .455• /• 5..f ~ ~ .. m _ \ b • Y\• . 6T 4.49 Ae 1CI / _•I- jtl•' .~ ~ .1p •" \ .' JIM WALTER HOMES INC. DEPARTMENT OF PLANIVIA'G AND ZONING TAX # 88.03-1-1.1 I~(~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 27, 1995 ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO JIM WALTER HOMES, INC. TO BUILD A CONSTRUCTION STORAGE YARD ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ROUTE 200 AND VA 674, (TAX PARCEL 88.03-1-1.1.), CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Jim Walter Homes, Inc. has filed a petition to build a construction storage yard on the southeast corner of Route 220 and VA 674 in the Cave Spring Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on June 6, 1995; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on May 23, 1995; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on June 27, 1995. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to build a construction storage yard on the southeast corner of Route 220 and VA 674 in the Cave Spring Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1-456 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and hereby grants a Special Use Permit to Jim Walter Homes, Inc. to allow said use with the following condition: (1) The construction yard shall be located approximately as shown on the concept plan. zoningjimwalte.hom 1 W I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I f111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 U! _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~_ _ _ _ _ - APPE CE REQUEST ' \ ~,PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS = SUBJECT: ;~' ~ ~ ~ ~A lt~ n ~-l~•yt r-s __ c I would like the Chairman of the Board of Su ervisors to reco nize me durin the P g g meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS c __ FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: - ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment = whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will e f th l l i ~ n orce e ru e un ess nstructed by the majority ot the Board to do otherwise. - ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view onl . y __ Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. =_ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized __ speaker and audience members is not allowed. c -_ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. - - ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. _ - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK _ =_ - - _ - _ - - _ - NAME . ~,~i/2 ~ ~ ~ - - _ ~, - _ _ - ~_ / - _ _ ADDRESS _ ~G' ~,~ / ~~1 ~y ~ i rY ~ - _ PHONE ~ ~ ~ ~~~_ - _ - - fiIIIIIIIIIIIiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIIIIIIIIIIIIII11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111~1I11111111111111111111 ~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~iiiiiii~iiiiiiiii~~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~ ~ ~ , c AGENDA ITEM NO. __ i APPE CE REQUEST - - _ - PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS _ SUBJECT: ~ ~ - c - _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS c FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED __ BELOW: __ _ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment = whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of~the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments _ with the clerk. _ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK ~_ ~ _ ~ _ ~ - __ r - ~ ~ ~ ~_ m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~111111111111Illlillllllllllllllilllilllllll Iililllilllllllillllllllilll Ililllllllllllllllllilllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllll~ _ _ - - - - __ _ - T/ - AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ __ APPE CE REQUEST - _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS _ - = SUBJECT: _ J „, , ~, _ ~- (_~ .... I -~ < , ,,. , ., - -_ _ -_ -_ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS c FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment c whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ot~the Board to = do otherwise. _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments __ with the clerk. __ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - _ _ - ~ - ~_ - - ~ - ~ - ~ _ - ~ ~ ~ - w NAME ~'~; ->~,~ ~- ~. , , ~, - r`' - ADDRESS `~ ~~ ~. ~ ; ~~,,~_~,~ -~ - _ _ _ - PHONE ;~ ~ L'~ - 5 ~. ~S - milllllllllllllilllllllllllliilllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllll~ Willl IIII IIIIIIII Illlllllllllillllllliiillliliilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllliillilllllllliilllllllllllll~ ~ ~ ~ i - ~ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. c _ _ APPE CE REQUEST _ _ - _ _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE i ~ CITIZENS COMMENTS _ - - _ = SUB ECT: ~'~ ~'r ~1 ~~~- ..~- ~ ~ - - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the - i c meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. _ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS _ FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: c -_ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue , c and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of~the Board to do otherwise. _ _ - _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained b the Chairman _ y . _ c ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized c speaker and audience members is not allowed. c =_ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. - _ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK = _ _- c = _ c ~ ~ - ~ ~ __ ~ _- - - - - - - ~ NAME ~ ~1< F: ~.,~ s ..{ , ~;..~ o " ~' , yl ADDRESS .~ ~ ~ C1 -~} ~ ~ ~~ , ,..~ `~ ~"' ~~, ~~~ c~~ , - . PHONE ~'l `~, `O - ~C? ~` ~ c - mlllllll IIIIIIilllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllillllllllllilllllllllllllllllilillllllllllilllillllllllllllllll~ I_. A ROANOKE COUNTY COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE 772-2007 MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Paul M. Mahoney SUBJECT: HB 1545 -Early Retirement -Involuntary Separation DATE: 23 June 1995 On May 18, 1995, I alerted you about HB 1545 adopted during the 1995 session of the Virginia General Assembly. This legislation provides an unreduced retirement benefit for any county administrator, city manager, or school superintendent who is involuntarily separated from service after July 1, 1995, subject to certain conditions. This legislation is applicable to these employees of local governments unless the local government notifies the Virginia Retirement System (VRS) otherwise in writing on or before July 1, 1995. I advised you that the Board may (1) take no action (in which case these early retirement provisions for the County Administrator become applicable for Roanoke County), or (2) inform VRS that the provisions of this legislation shall not apply to the County Administrator in Roanoke County in writing on or before July 1, 1995. Several Board members expressed their preference affirmatively to elect to accept or reject this unreduced retirement benefit option, instead of allowing it to become applicable through non-action. Attached you will find a resolution drafted with accept/reject language to address this issue. The Board has the power to make this election only for the County, not for the School Board. Also attached you will find a copy of a memorandum prepared by Penny Hodge in the Finance Department that discusses the fiscal impact of this legislation on both the School Board and the County. This item is not on the printed agenda for June 27, 1995. As stated above, if the Board takes no action, then this legislation becomes applicable for Roanoke County. If the Board intends affirmatively to take some action with respect to this legislation, then it should add this resolution to its agenda. cc: Elmer C. Hodge Attachment -Penny Hodge memo pmm.earlyret.mo AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 27, 1995 p ~ ~,~~~5~ _~ RESOLUTION EXPRESSING THE ELECTION BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, TO ACCEPT/REJECT THE OPTION FOR AN UNREDUCED RETIREMENT BENEFIT FOR THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR IF INVOLUNTARILY SEPARATED FROM COUNTY SERVICE WHEREAS, the 1995 session of the Virginia General Assembly adopted HB 1545 which provided for a one-time irrevocable election to provide an unreduced retirement benefit for any county administrator, city manager or school superintendent who is involuntarily separated from service after July 1, 1995, subject to certain conditions; and, WHEREAS, this legislation shall apply to employees of local governments unless that local government notifies the Virginia Retirement System (VRS) otherwise in writing prior to July 1, 1995. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, By the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 51.1-155.2 of the Code of Virginia, as amended by the 1995 session of the Virginia General Assembly (HB 1545), the Board of Supervisors elects to accept/reject the application of this amendment to Roanoke County. This amendment would allow the retirement without reduction in retirement allowance required by Section 51.1-155.A.2 by the county administrator if involuntarily separated from service. 2. That the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors is directed to mail a certified copy of this Resolution to the Board of Trustees of the Virginia Retirement System. AG E N DA. G EN E RAL. RE 77 R E. RSO 1 ~ . Memorandum To: Paul Mahoney -- , ~,y~,J From: Penny Hodg ~~-" Date: June 20, 1995 Subject: HB 1545 Involuntary Separation from Service Per your request, I have been researching the fiscal impact of HB 1545 concerning the involuntary separation from service of the School Superintendent and County Administrator. This bill closely resembles a bill passed last year for state employees. The bill will provide an unreduced benefit for any county administrator or school superintendent who is involuntarily terminated from service with the county after July 1, 1995 only if the individual has at least 20 years of service in VRS and does not go on to another VRS covered position. The amount of the benefit will be based on the individuals actual years of service and age. Our Superintendent and County Administrator will be covered by this bill unless our boards opt out of the coverage by June 30, 1995. It is a one- time, irrevocable election. At Mr. Hodge's request, I inquired as to the possibility of opting out of the coverage for the current Administrator and providing the coverage for all future administrators. The language of the bill does not provide for a future election of any kind and therefore this is not an option for any locality in the state. There is no fiscal impact of providing this coverage for our current School Superintendent. Dr. Gordon has over 30 years of service in the retirement system and is therefore eligible for a full retirement benefit upon her termination/retirement. The fiscal impact of future superintendents is impossible to measure since it will depend upon the years of service and age of the individuals who will be in this position. However, the superintendent is part of a state wide teacher pool with over 100,000 members. Even if Roanoke County opts not to provide this coverage to our superintendent, our retirement rate will reflect any increased liability for all other school divisions in the state who did not opt out. Unlike the school system, the retirement rate for county employees is based on the county's own actuarial determined experience. Mr. Hodge has 19 ~ ~ ,~ years of covered service at this time and would not be eligible for an unreduced benefit under this bill until he reaches 20 years of service. After that time, he would only be eligible if he does not accept another VRS covered position. Any additional liability would again be minimal because it would be spread over an employment pool of over 700 members. According to VRS, there is not enough time for them to complete an actuarial study of Roanoke County prior to June 30, 1995. In any event, this study would be an additional expenditure of the county. The study would look at the size of our group, ages of members, prior rate of refunds, and turnover and would make some hypothetical assumptions concerning future events. Since our retirement rate is set for each biennium and is based on the prior two years of experience, any increase in our rate as a result of HB 1545 could conceivably take 4-6 years to impact the County. In summary, Dr. Gordon's retirement benefit will be the same amount regardless of whether the county opts out of this bill. Mr. Hodge's benefit will be enhanced to 100% of the benefit amount based on his years of service or age, whichever provides the higher benefit. In other words, he would not be given credit for reaching full retirement of 30 years of service or age 65 but he would not have his benefit for his actual years of service or age reduced if the county takes no action regarding HB 1545. Attached is the reduction table for determining the early retirement factor to be used by individuals filing for a retirement benefit with less than 30 years of service and under age 65. You can see that if Mr. Hodge were to be terminated with 20 years of service, he would be eligible for only 46% of his retirement benefit. However, the effect of this bill is to grant him 100% of the benefit as long as he does not accept another VRS covered position. If you have any other questions, I will be happy to talk with either Bo Harris or Rolly Butts at VRS and try to find some more answers. c: Elmer Hodge Deanna Gordon Virginia Retirement System BENEFITS MANUAL Section: 11 Page: 5 Subject: SERVICE RETIREMEN EMPLOYERS WITH 55/30 FIGURE 11-3 Virg is Retirement System 55/30 ly Retirement Factors Retiring between ages 55 anSE6 IGH~ FASCTOR.anIfOless than 20 ylears, use ag e age and service factors. factor. Early ly Retirement Retir ent Acre Service actor Acre Serv ice Fa or 65 - 0 30 - + 1.0 00 62 - 11 27 - 11 10 .8750 ,8700 64 - 11 29 - 11 •9 50 10 9 g .8650 10 10 .9 00 8 g .8600 g 9 .9 50 7 7 .8550 g g .9 00 6 6 .8500 7 7 .9 50 5 5 .8450 6 6 .9 00 4 4 .8400 5 5 .9 650 3 3 .8350 4 4 .9 600 2 2 .8300 3 3 .9 550 1 1 .8250 2 2 1 500 450 62 - 0 27 - 0 .8200 1 64 - 0 29 - 0 400 63 - 11 28 - 11 350 61 - 11 26 - 11 10 .8150 .8100 10 10 300 10 9 9 .8050 g g 250 8 8 .8000 g g 200 7 7 .7950 7 7 150 6 6 .7900 6 6 100 5 5 .7850 5 5 050 4 4 .7800 4 4 000 3 3 .7750 3 3 950 2 2 .7700 2 2 900 1 1 .7650 63 1 -0 28 1 -0 850 800 61- 0 26 -0 .7600 ~ a~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 27, 1995 RESOLUTION 62795-13 ESTABLISHING SALARIES FOR THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AND THE COUNTY ATTORNEY WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby establishes the salaries for the County Administrator and the County Attorney for Fiscal Year 1995-96. BE IT RESOLVED, By the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the annual salary for the County Administrator shall be increased by 4.8% ($4413.76) calculated upon the midpoint for Grade 43 of the County of Roanoke Classification and Pay Plan, July 1995. The adjusted annual salary for the County Administrator shall be $105,748.86. 2. That the annual salary for the County Attorney shall be increased by 4.8% ($3631.16) calculated upon the midpoint for Grade 39 of the County of Roanoke Classification and Pay Plan, July 1995. In addition the annual salary of the County Attorney is increased by the sum of $3,000.00 for the purpose of an elective deferral under an existing salary reduction agreement pursuant to Sections 402 and 457 of the Internal Revenue Code. The adjusted annual salary for the County Attorney shall be $89,627.11. 3. That the effective date for the establishment of these salaries shall be July 1, 1995. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution with 4.8% increase from midpoint for County Administrator and County 1 ~ y r i ~ Attorney and with $3,000 additional increase for County Attorney for an annuity, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: Supervisor Eddy A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Ho ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance D. Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 2 .. ,. ROANOKE COUNTY COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE 772-2007 MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Paul M. Mahoney ~~ SUBJECT: Salaries for County Administrator and County Attorney DATE: 22 June 1995 After the Executive Session on June 13, 1995, the Board voted to award the County Administrator a salary increase of 4.8% of the midpoint and the County Attorney 4.8% of the midpoint and an additional $3,000 for deferred compensation retirement fund. It was suggested that an appropriate resolution be placed on the agenda for June 27, 1995, to address this topic. Attached you will find a draft resolution for this purpose. It is recommended that the Board add this item to its June 27 agenda. In addition, I must alert the Board to a possible problem concerning the $3,000 retirement annuity. The Internal Revenue Code has specific provisions addressing "discriminatory benefits" (the same benefit is not offered to all employees). These non-discrimination requirements apply to this situation. A salary reduction agreement, or "elective deferrals" (the County's existing deferred compensation plan) are tested separately from the "non- elective deferrals." Under the IRS Code in years beginning after 1988 a salary reduction plan will meet the non-discrimination requirements if all employees of the organization are eligible to elect salary reduction, provided the deferral is more than $200. The County's existing deferred compensation plan satisfies this test. These discrimination requirements for non-elective deferrals would prohibit a direct $3,000 contribution to a retirement plan for the County Attorney. The County is prohibited from offering non-elective contributions to selective individuals (or, in other words, the County cannot begin any new discriminatory non-elective deferrals). T$ In order to comply with the IRS Code, non-discrimination provisions, and to accomplish the intent of the Board, I recommend that the Board increase the annual salary of the County Attorney by $3,000. The County Attorney would then allocate this $3,000 as an .. elective deferral under his existing salary reduction agreement (deferred compensation plan). This $3,000 would be spread over 24 pay periods, I would allocate the increase to my deferred compensation plan, and, in other words, you would have to trust me that I would allocate all of it to this retirement fund (an elective deferral under an existing salary reduction agreement). I have drafted the attached resolution accordingly. If this is unacceptable or if it does not fulfill the Board's intentions, you could direct staff to revise the resolution accordingly. I apologize for the "glitch" in the process. PMM/spb pmm.salaries.mo ., . , ~ ~~ ~~ ~~,~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 27, 1995 Q ~ a~er~ RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING SALARIES FOR THE COUNTY ADM_IIJNISTRATOR AND THE COUNTY ATTORNEY WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby establishes the salaries for the County Administrator and the County Attorney for Fiscal Year 1995-96. BE IT RESOLVED, By the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the annual salary for the County Administrator shall be increased by 4.8~ ($4413.76) calculated upon the midpoint for Grade 43 of the County of Roanoke Classification and Pay Plan, July 1995. The adjusted annual salary for the County Administrator. shall be $105,748.86. 2. That the annual salary for the County Attorney shall be increased by 4.8~ ($3631.16) calculated upon the midpoint for Grade 39 of the County of Roanoke Classification and Pay Plan, July 1995. In addition the annual salary of the County Attorney is increased by the sum of $3,000.00 for the purpose of an elective deferral under an existing salary reduction agreement pursuant to Sections 402 and 457 of the Internal Revenue Code. The adjusted annual salary for the County Attorney shall be $89,627.11. 3. That the effective date for the establishment of these salaries shall be July 1, 1995. G:~,4TfORNE1IROARDV U NE27.95~SAIARIES 1 OF ROANp~.~ a ti p Z G7 7838 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE MARY H. ALLEN, CMC ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 BRENDA J. HOLTON CLERK TO THE BOARD (703)772-2005 DEPUTY CLERK FAX (703) 772-2193 MEMORANDUM TO: Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer FROM: Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk ~ ~~ DATE: June 2 9 , 19 9 5 . SUBJECT: VOTING CREDENTIALS - NACO CONFERENCE This will advise that at the Board Meeting on June 27, 1995, the Board of Supervisors appointed you as the Roanoke County's delegate to the National Association of Counties Conference to be held July 21 - 25, 1995. Attached is a copy of the Credentials Identification Form which Chairman Minnix has signed. It is being faxed today to the Credentials Committee in Washington, D. C. Attachment cc: Credentials Committee Fax 202-393-2630 ®a~~a P~ ~ ROANp~.~ ~. Z A ~ ~ ~ a? 1 38 MARY H. ALLEN, CMC CLERK TO THE BOARD C~oix~#~ a~ ~.o~ttx~a~e P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2005 FAX (703) 772-2193 June 30, 1995 Mr. James D. Campbell Executive Director Virginia Association of Counties 1001 East Broad Street Richmond, VA 23219 Dear Jim: BRENDA J. HOLTON DEPUTY CLERK Attached is a certified copy of Resolution No. 62795-1 recommending legislative proposals to the Virginia Association of Counties for the 1996 Session of the Virginia General Assembly. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, June 27, 1995. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Attachment cc: Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney ® P~ MEMORANDUM TO: Board Members FROM: Gary Robertson, Otility Director DATE: une 12, 1995 sIIBJECT: Georqe Pierce - sanitary Sewer Extension on Olsen Road Mr. Pierce addressed the Board of Supervisors approximately one month ago concerning his costs for extending sanitary sewer service to property he had purchased. Mr. Pierce has since met with Arnold Covey and me to discuss his situation and possible solutions. Background Mr. Pierce purchased a parcel of land that was located approximately 240 feet from the public sewer line. ~€ Approximately two years ago, the realtor that had this property listed contacted the Roanoke County Utility Department concerning sewer availability. The realtor was notified that in order to develop this property with public sewer, an eight inch main extension would be required. On July 20, 1994, Mr. Pierce's contractor, Patwil Homes, again contacted our office concerning sewer availability. Our office responded with another letter dated July 21, 1994 outlining the procedure for a sanitary sewer extension (copy enclosed). ~€ Plans were approved for this extension in October, 1994 and construction has since been completed. Mr. Pierce is concerned because his engineer had estimated this sewer extension to cost approximately $6,500 and the final cost was in the neighborhood of $16,000. Although I sympathize with Mr. Pierce on these costs, I would have hoped he would investigate his costs and options prior to purchasing the property. June 12, 1995 Page Two If Mr. Pierce could install a four inch diameter private sewer lateral, his cost would be approximately $7,000. Because Roanoke County required an eight inch diameter pipe for future extension, he feels Roanoke County should pay the difference in cost between a four inch and eight inch line. Summary of Information The Roanoke County sewer ordinance provides for off-site credits on main extensions that exceed three hundred feet. These credits can be in the form of crediting the developers off-site fees (in this case $1,000), reimbursement contracts for future connections, or in situations where the extension provides substantial benefit to Roanoke County, direct participation may be appropriate. The Roanoke County policy requires main line extensions when the sewer line has the potential to serve other properties. Yes, Mr. Pierce has installed a sewer line that will benefit other properties, but Mr. Pierce is receiving the benefit of a sewer line that other developers paid for. Each of the properties that will benefit from the line Mr. Pierce installed will then be required to make a main line extension themselves. The theory behind this practice is that each developer pays a reasonable portion for a sewer extension. This same practice is used in subdivision development, however, this cost is included in the purchase price of the home instead of the direct cost Mr. Pierce experienced. Options: option 1: Although this extension was only 240 feet, it did involve a creek crossing and a road crossing which made the costs considerably higher than a normal extension. Because of these conditions, the County could waive the 300 foot provision of the ordinance and credit Mr. Pierce a portion or all of his $1,000 off-site facility fee. June 12, 1995 Page Three Option 2: The County could participate with Mr. Pierce on this extension and pay the difference between a four inch line and an eight inch line estimated to be $9,000. This would be a major revision to County policy and would mean that existing Roanoke County sewer customers would be subsidizing Mr. Pierce's extension with little chance of recovering this amount through future connections. Oution 3: Offer no credits or participation to Mr. Pierce. Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends proceeding with his $1,000 off-site fee because this line. Although staff does satisfy Mr. Pierce, we feel it time. Option 1 and crediting Mr. Pierce of the difficulty in installing not feel that this will totally .s the most we can offer at this Staff is considering utilizing the petition for public works process on small extensions such as this in the future. Because persons such as Mr. Pierce do not normally do this type of work, they feel uncomfortable hiring contractors and engineers. By the County assuming the responsibility for coordination under the petition for public works process, the property owner will know his maximum cost up front and the County staff can assist in providing the most cost-effective route. Although this change will not help Mr. Pierce, it would lessen the chance for this situation to occur in the future. Staff would appreciate your comments the majority of the Board feels that we should schedule a work session t Thank you for your input! cc: Elmer Hodge concerning this procedure. If the ordinance is broken, then o discuss possible changes. Arnold Covey O~ EtOANp~.~ !~.s ~ , '?a« ` 9 ~ r: ~ L7 2 J :: a~ 1838 ~~~~~ ~~ ~~C~~.~Z.~ UTILITY DEPARTMENT July 21, 1994 Pat-Wil Homes 9 Wildwood Road Salem, VA 24153 RE: Availability Olsen Road Tax Map No. Water/Sewer Dear Sir: No. 93-184A 26.16-1-8 & 9 Public water and sanitary sewer are not currently available to these lots along Olsen Road, Tax Map No. 26.16-1-8 and 9. Water service to these lots would require an 8 inch water line extension of approximately 1000 feet from the intersection of Olsen and North Barrens Roads to these lots. Due to the expense of this extension, you may want to consider drilling a well for each of these lots. Sanitary sewer would require an extension of the public sewer system of approximately 250 feet from the sewer main in a public easement approximately 200 feet south of Olsen Road across from these lots. The owner would be responsible for the cost of the sewer extension, obtaining a public easement, highway permit, and any other associated requirements. The sewer connection fee would be $500.00 per lot. After September 1, 1994 the sewer connection fee will increase to $1,000.00. This letter and states fees are valid to September 1, 1995. The water and sewer system extensions must be designed by an engineer and approved by the County prior to construction. You should have your engineer provide you a cost estimate for these extensions and then complete the design. 1206 KESSLER MILL ROAD • SALEM, VIRGINIA 24153 • (703) 387-6104 ® Printed on Recyded Paper Pat-Wil Homes July 21, 1994 Page Two If you have any questions or need additional clarification of the above information, please contact me at 387-6102. Si cerely, Robert C. Fronk Utility Engineer ds c: Arnold Covey Engineering & Inspections 14 June 1995 JOSEPH B. OBENSHAIN SENIOR ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY VICKIE L. HUFFMAN ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY ~ - ~ ~~ H. Morgan Griffith, Esquire Attorney at Law 113 E. Main Street Salem, VA 24153 Re: Highway and Transportation Safety Commission Dear Morgan: The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors appoints citizens to the Highway and Transportation Safety Commission to advise it on these important transportation and safety issues. Mr. Minnix, the Chairman of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, is seeking an attorney who resides in the County who might be willing to serve as a volunteer on this Commission. As President of the Salem-Roanoke County Bar Association, I am contacting you for recommendations for appointment to this Commission. Enclosed you will find some information about the duties and responsibilities of service on this Commission. Very truly yours, } ~ ROANp'YR O L z ~ ~ _ V .a 1838 PAUL M. MAHONEY COUNTY ATTORNEY PMM/spb Enclosure C c.: ~f~1~.-=~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney P.O. BOX 29800 • ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 • (703) 772-2007 ~~~~~ .~~ a0r~~~ OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY ® Recyded Paper 26 HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION SAFETY COMMISSION ROANORE COIINTY A. COMPOSITION: (Section 33.1 - 398, Code of Virginia) (Resolution 84-37 approved February 14, 1984) To consist of eleven (11) members of the Commission appointed by the Board of Supervisors. Terms shall be four years, but no members shall serve for more than two (2} full successive terms. Initial appointments to be staggered B. DIITIEB: The Commission shall have the duty and responsibility to: (a) review, examine, and approve all highway safety grants and recommend same to the Board of Supervisors; (b) promote all highway and transportation safety programs; (c) make recommendations through the Board of Supervisors to VDH&T regarding signs, road improvements, and engineering improvement; and (d) develop and establish through the Board of Supervisors a safety program for the County and sponsor an annual awards banquet for persons excelling in the application of safety measures and procedures. C. MEETING SCHEDIILE: Minimum of 4 meetings per year. i PUBLIC NOTICE Please be advised that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia at its meeting on June 27, 1995 at the County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, Virginia during the evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. will hold a public hearing on the following matter: Adoption of the Virginia Department of Transportation funding for the Secondary Road System Six Year Construction Plan for fiscal year 1995-96 All members of the public interested in the matter set forth above may appear and be heard at the time and place aforesaid. A copy of the proposing funding referred to above is on file at the Residency Office, State Highway Department, 714 South Broad Street, Salem, Virginia, and the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, Virginia where it is available for public inspection during regular business hours. ~- Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board PLEASE PUBLISH ON THE FOLLOWING DATES Tuesday, June 13, 1995 Tuesday, June 20, 1995 SEND BILL FOR PUBLICATION TO: Mary H. Allen, Clerk to the Board Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 R~;E BEARD SIJPER'JISOR: TEL :7G.3-77L-21Q3 .. No. Receiver Transmitter Date Time Mode f'ar~es Result Transmit r~onfirmatior~ Repot ~iQ1 9~~13.'aF5 RKE BOARD SUPER~JISOR~ Ju.n D~'~5 ~ :54 lJ~l'S!1 Norm OK gun 09'5 ?:5a LEGAL NOTICE Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their 7:00 p.m. session on Tuesday, June 27, 1995, in the Board Meeting Room at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive S. W. on the petition of Glenn J. and Mary Ann Hammerand and Robert A. and Frances E. Vessey, requesting vacation of an unimproved dedicated right-of-way referred to as Ocala Drive, recorded in Plat Book 4, Page 63, Sun Valley Subdivision, and located in the Hollins Magisterial District. A copy of the documents related to this request maybe examined in the office of the Department of Engineering and Inspections, located at the Roanoke County Administration Center. Given under my hand this 6th day of June, 1995. ~ • L~? ~cJ Mary H. Allen, CMC, Clerk to the Board Roanoke County Board of Supervisors PLEASE PUBLISH IN THE ROANOKE TIMES AND WORLD NEWS ON: June 13, 1995 June 20, 1995 Direct the bill for publication to: Glenn J. and Mary Ann Hammerand 142 Verndale Drive Roanoke, VA 24019 LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COIINTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, June 27, 1995, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Susan Carol Rolfe & Mark Reinhardt to rezone .84 acre from C-1 to C-2 to operate a karate and fitness studio, located in the former DMV building at 5407 Peters Creek Road, Hollins Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: June 8, 1995 ~- -~ Mary H. Al en, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, June 13, 1995 Tuesday, June 20, 1995 To be paid on delivery by: Susan Rolfe or Mark Reinhardt 4128 High Acres Road NW Roanoke, VA 24019 (703) 562-4486 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOR 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, June 27, 1995, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Shelor Inc. for a Special Use Permit to operate a used car lot, located on the west side of Williamson Road 400 feet north of its intersection with Plymouth Drive, Hollins Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: June 8, 1995 iY~ Mary H. A en, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, June 13, 1995 Tuesday, June 20, 1995 Direct the bill for publication to: Shelor Inc. Attn: Ron Palmieri 6718 Williamson Road Roanoke, VA 24019 (703) 362-3998 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BO% 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, June 27, 1995, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Roanoke County Planning Commission to amend the text of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance to allow manufactured homes in the County's agricultural zoning districts pursuant to Section 15.1-486.4, as amended in the 1995 Legislative Session. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: June 8, 1995 Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, June 13, 1995 Tuesday, June 20, 1995 Direct the bill for publication to: Roanoke County Planning Department PO Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BO% 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, June 27, 1995, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Akfer Corporation to rezone approximately 68.4 acres from AG-3 to AR to construct single family detached dwellings, located beyond the terminus of Toddsbury Drive to the east, Vinton Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: June 8, 1995 Mary H. lien, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, June 13, 1995 Tuesday, June 20, 1995 Direct the bill for publication to: Akfer Corporation c/o Julian Ferguson 4172 Toddsbury Drive Vinton, VA 24179 (703) 890-3603 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOR 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, June 27, 1995, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Jim Walter Homes Inc. for a Special Use Permit to build a construction storage yard on the southeast corner of Route 220 and VA 674, Cave Spring Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: June 8, 1995 ~ ~~~~~ Mary H. Al en, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times & World-News Tuesday, June 13, 1995 Tuesday, June 20, 1995 Direct the bill for publication to: Jim Walter Homes Inc. 100 Wildwood Road Salem, VA 24153 (703) 389-7264 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PIIBLICATION TO: ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018 k ~ j 6/22/95 9:33 am LBE, BLJ, EGK, FM, HCN Re: Chief Cease's recommendations for appointment to Highway and Transportation Safety Commission I asked Chief Cease this morning whether or not he was ready to submit his recommendations for appointment to this committee. He advised me that this has been delayed because he has been out of town, and he is in the process of obtaining this information. Brenda cc: ECH ~'Y,~ t~ Gt~l..~ ~~ ~o ~.GQ. f l ~~~~ ~~au~~ ~-