Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1/9/1996 - Regular O~ MOAN ~,~ ti. .z X838 WORKING DOCUMENT -MAY BE REVISED ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION AGENDA JANUARY 9, 1996 i~rr ff rr~ surf ~ uo,norr `vn2m Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement in order to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings or other programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County, please contact the Clerk to the Board at (703) 772-2005. We request that you provide at least 48- hours notice so that proper arrangements may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES 1. Roll Call. ALL PRESENT AT 3:01 P.M. 2. Invocation: John M. Chambliss Assistant County Administrator 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. ECH UPDATED BOARD ON SNOW REMOVAL AND EMERGENCY SERVICES. ADVISED THAT STAFF AND VOLUNTEERS HAD WORKED ALL WEEKEND. REFUSE COLLECTION HAS BEEN SUSPENDED FOR THE WEEK AND THE COUNTY WILL BE DECLARING AN EMERGENCY SITUATION. i ® Recvdetl Faper B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS FM RECEIVED REQUEST FROM CITIZENS INTERESTED IN MARTA SAYERS REZONING AND MOVED TO DEFER ITEM F-1 BECAUSE CITIZENS COULD NOT ATTEND DUE TO SNOW. HCN ADVISED HE HAD REVIEWED VIDEO AND THAT THE ITEM WAS FOR VOTE ONLY NOT A PUBLIC HEARING WHICH WAS HELD ON 12/12/95. MOTION DEFEATED BY FOLLOWING VOTE AYES-LBE,FM NAYS-FFH,HCN,BI.4T PMM ADDED 2 ITEMS - E-3, RESOLUTTON DECLARING A LOCAL EMERGENCY DUE TO DANGEROUS WEATHER CONDITIONS AND F- 2 RESOLUTION SUPPORTING LEGISLATIVE INITIATIVE OF ROANOKE CITY TO CREATE A REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT COMMISSION. C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Resolution of Appreciation to H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix for his service as 1995 Chairman of the Board of Supervisors. R-010996-1 BLJ MOTION TO ADOPT RESO URC FM PRESENTED WITH RESO AND CLOCK FM THANKED BOARD, STAFF AND ECH FOR THEIR LEADERSHIP 2. Recognition by the Virginia Association of Counties of Supervisor Bob L. Johnson for completion of 10 years of service as a Supervisor. FRAMED CERTIFICATE PRESENTED BY ECH TO B ~T 3. Resolution and Certificates of Appreciation to the members of the Roanoke County Visioning Steering 2 Committee. R-j01 CI996-2 LBE MOTION TO ADOPT RESO URC CERTIFICATES PRESENTED TO MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE WHO WERE PRESENT D. BRIEFINGS NONE E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Resolution in support of the location of the Blue Ridge Visitors Center on the Roanoke River Parkway. R-010996-3 V HCN MOTION TO ADOPT RESO URC LBE REQUESTED COPIES OF RESO GO TO SUPERINTENDENT OF BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY AND DIRECTOR OF PARK SERVICES 2. Appointments of Board Members to Committees, Commissions and Boards. A-010996-4 FFH APPOINTED TO 5TH PDC REPLACING FM FM APPOINTED TO THE AUDIT COMMITTEE REPLACING EGK BI.J MOTION TO CONFIRM APPOINTMENTS UW 3. Resolution ratifying for the County of conditions. V the declaration of a local emergency Roanoke due to dangerous weather R-010996-5 BIT MOTION TO ADOPT RESO URC F. OLD BUSINESS 3 1. Ordinance to Rezone 1.146 acres from R-1 and C-1 to R-1 and C-2 to operate a personal services facility located at 3143 Brambleton Avenue, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Marta Sayers. (Terry Harrington, Planning and Zoning Director) (CONTINUED FROM DECEMBER 12, 1995 BECAUSE OF A TIE VOTE OF THOSE MEMBERS PRESENT) 0-010996-6 FM MOTION TO DENY REZONING AYES-LBE,FM NAYS-FFH,HCN,BI~T BI;T MOTION TO APPROVE AYES-FFH,HCN,BI~T NAYS-LBE,FM 2. Resolution supporting the legislative initiative of the City of Roanoke to create a Regional Transportation District Commission. R-010996-7 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE AMENDMENTS URC HCN ASKED PLANNING COMMISSION TO LOOK AT USES FOR C-1 VERSUS C-2 ZONING AND BRING BACK RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE BOARD G. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS H. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS I. PUBLIC HEARING 1. Public Hearing and resolution for two Intermodel Surface Transportation Enhancement Act (ISTEA) grant applications as follows: 4 a. Submitted by the Hanging Rock Battlefield Trail, Phase II, Catawba Magisterial District. (Tim Gubala, Economic Development Director) R-010996-8 FFH MOTION TO ADOPT RESO AS AMENDED BY LBE DELETING 2ND WHEREAS CLAUSE AND ADDING LANGUAGE FROM RESO IN I- lb URC b. Submitted by the Roanoke County Planning Department Hollins Magisterial District for landscape and streetscape enhancement of five locations within Roanoke County, three of which are adjacent to Botetourt County. (Terry Harrington, Planning and Zoning Director) R-010996-9 BI;T MOTION TO ADOPT RESO URC J. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance vacating a 50 foot unimproved right-of~vay referred to as Grarnille Street which is located between the intersections of Northway Drive (Route 1820) and Chester Drive (Route 1857) for approximately 400 feet in length, as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 20, and located in the Hollins Magisterial District. (Arnold Covey, Director of Engineering & Inspections) BI{T MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND AND PUBLIC HEARING 1/23/96 AYES-FM,FFH,HCN,BI~T NAYS-NONE ABSTAIN-LBE 2. Ordinance authorizing the acquisition of certain interests 5 in real estate for a well lot in Brookwood Subdivision. (Paul Nlahonev, County Attorney) LBE MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING USING ALTERNATIVE #2 IN ORD. NOT ALTERNATIVE #1 2ND - 1/23/96 URC I~. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance amending and reenacting the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, 0-82592-12, to define bingo halls/rooms as permitted use with a Special Use Permit upon the petition of the Roanoke County Planning Commission. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 0-010996-10 BIT MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC L. APPOINTMENTS 1. Blue Ridge Community Services FM NOMINATED T. WILLIAM PISTNER TO ANOTHER THREE-YEAR TERMS EXPIRING 12/31/98. 2. Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals 3. Highway and Transportation Safety Commission M. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM 6 OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. R-010996-11 FM MOTION TO ADOPT AFTER DISCUSSION OF #2 URC 1. Request for Appropriations to the School Operating and Grant Funds from the Virginia Commission for the Arts, the Virginia Department WorkKeys Pilot Project, the Department of Education School-to-Work Program and donations from the Education Foundation. A-010996-1 La 2. Request from the Police Department for acceptance of a Grant from the Department of Criminal Justice Services for Incident Based Reporting. A-010996-1 i.b 3. Donation of sanitary sewer and drainage easements in connection with development of a lot on Lynnson Drive awned by James K. Penn and Cheryl Walker Penn. A-010996-1 l.c 4. Donation of sanitary sewer easements in connection with development of Section No. 9 SteepleHunt of Canterbury Park. A-010996-1 l.d 5. Reaffirmation of appointment of Economic Development Director Timothy Gubala to the Southwest Development Financing Board of Directors. A-010996-1 l.e N. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS Supervisor Eddv: (11 received a letter from Delegate Dillard suggesting support for a small claims court in Roanoke County and discussed issue with PMM. PMM advised that he had forwarded the letter to the Chief .Tudge of General District Court and had not received a response. LBE asked PMM to contact judge again. 2) Asked about revision to the swimming ordinance PMM advised that County staff is working with Health Department and will have a revised ordinance prior to the swimming pool season (3) He had received complaints about VDOT snow removal and suggested that it would be appropriate to express concern about reallocating resources or establishing priorities ECH will yet with VDOT, Police Department, Fire and Rescue to set possible priorities for snow removal (4) Advised that at the 1/2 organizational meeting, the Board set meeting in November for 11/19 which is a ~4~week interval between board meetings, and suggested 11/12. ECH advised that VACo annual conference is on that date. No consensus to change meeting date. Supervisor Minnix: (1) Thanked the Board for the resolution and clock and expressed appreciation to everyone for their support during his term as chair. (2) Asked for update on pumping at Spring Hollow Reservoir. Gray Robertson updated Board members , on progress at the reservoir and plans for recreational use. AMG also updated the Board on the grand opening of the water treatment plant on 1/13/96 Supervisor Harrison: advised the Board that he would not wear a sweat suit to meetings in the future but he had to walk in the snow to get a ride to the meeting. Supervisor Nickens: Commended VDOT and County employees including Fire and Rescue, Police Dept. Parks and Recreation and others Suggested an article in the employee newsletter thanking them for their efforts. Supervisor .Tohnson: Announced that the airport had opened today. O. CITIZENS' CONIlVIENTS AND COI~~VILTNICATIONS NONE 8 P. REPORT'S FM MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE AFTER DISCUSSION OF ITEM 5 UW 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Statement of Estimated Revenues and Expenditures as of November 30, 1995 5. Update on upgrade of the regional wastewater treatment plant and major interceptor lines Q. WORK SESSION 1. Joint Work Session with the Roanoke Valley Area Metropolitan Planning Organization to discuss regional transportation planning issues POSTPONED BECAUSE OF SNOW R EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (1) to discuss a personnel issue regarding compensation and appointment of personnel. NO EXECUTIVE SESSION S. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION 9 ~'. ADJOtifRNMENT BI;T DECLARED MEETING ADTOURNED AT 4:35 P M io . ~ ROAN ~, F a Z ~ P z a 1838 ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA JANUARY 9, 1996 ,~~~~~ Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement in order to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings or other programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County, please contact the Clerk to the Board at (703) 772-2005_ We request that you provide at least 48- hours notice so that proper arrangements may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: John M. Chambliss Assistant County Administrator 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCIAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Resolution of Appreciation to H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix for his service as 1995 Chairman of the Board of Supervisors. i ® Recycled Paper 2. Recognition by the Virginia Association of Counties of Supervisor Bob L. Johnson for completion of 10 years of service as a Supervisor. D. E. F. G. H. I. 3. Resolution and Certificates of Appreciation to the members of the Roanoke County Visioning Steering Committee. BRIEFINGS NEW BUSINESS 1. Resolution in support of the location of the Blue Ridge Visitors Center on the Roanoke River Parkway. 2. Appointments of Board Members to Committees, Commissions and Boards. OLD BUSINESS 1. Ordinance to Rezone 1.146 acres from R-1 and C-1 to R-1 and C-2 to operate a personal services facility located at 3143 Brambleton Avenue, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Marta Sayers. (Terry Harrington, Planning and Zoning Director) (CONTINUED FROM DECEMBER 12, 1995 BECAUSE OF A TIE VOTE OF THOSE MEMBERS PRESENT) 2. Amendments to the County's Legislative Program (Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney) (CONTINUED FROM JANUARY 2, 199 REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS PUBLIC HEARING a 1. Public Hearing and resolution for two Intermodel Surface Transportation Enhancement Act (ISTEA) grant applications as follows: a. Submitted by the Hanging Rock Battlefield Trail, Phase II, Catawba Magisterial District. (Tim Gubala, Economic Development Director) b. Submitted by the Roanoke County Planning Department Hollins Magisterial District for landscape and streetscape enhancement of five locations within Roanoke County, three of which are adjacent to Botetourt County. (Terry Harrington, Planning and Zoning Director) J. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance vacating a 50 foot unimproved right-of~vay referred to as Granville Street which is located between the intersections of Northway Drive (Route 1820) and Chester Drive (Route 1857) for approximately 400 feet in length, as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 20, and located in the Hollins Magisterial District. (Arnold Covey, Director of Engineering & Inspections) 2. Ordinance authorizing the acquisition of certain interests in real estate for a well lot in Brookwood Subdivision. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) K. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance amending and reenacting the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, 0-82592-12, to define bingo halls/rooms as permitted use with a Special Use Permit upon the petition of the Roanoke County Planning Commission. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 3 L. APPOINTMENTS 1. Blue Ridge Community Services 2. Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals 3. Highway and Transportation Safety Commission M. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Request for Appropriations to the School Operating and Grant Funds from the Virginia Commission for the Arts, the Virginia Department WorkKeys Pilot Project, the Department of Education School-to-Work Program and donations from the Education Foundation. 2. Request from the Police Department for acceptance of a Grant from the Department of Criminal Justice Services for Incident Based Reporting. 3. Donation of sanitary sewer and drainage easements in connection with development of a lot on Lynnson Drive awned by James K. Penn and Cheryl Walker Penn. 4. Donation of sanitary sewer easements in connection with development of Section No. 9 SteepleHunt of Canterbury Park. 5. Reaffirmation of appointment of Economic Development Director Timothy Gubala to the Southwest Development 4 Financing Board of Directors. N. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS O. CITIZENS' COMI~~NTS AND CObRVIUNICATIONS P. REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Statement of Estimated Revenues and Expenditures as of November 30, 1995 5. Update on upgrade of the regional wastewater treatment plant and major interceptor lines Q. WORK SESSION 1. Joint Work Session with the Roanoke Valley Area Metropolitan Planning Organization to discuss regional transportation planning issues R. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (1) to discuss a personnel issue regarding compensation and appointment of personnel. S. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION T. ADJOURNMENT 5 C-) AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 9, 1996 RESOLUTION 010996-1 OF APPRECIATION TO H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX FOR HIS SERVICE AS 1995 CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WHEREAS, H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix served as Chairman of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors during 1995; and WHEREAS, during Mr. Minnix's term as Chairman, the County achieved a variety of accomplishments, including: ^ Completion of the Spring Hollow Water System, including installation of water transmission lines serving the Southwest Roanoke County area; ^ Initiation of a joint project among the Valley governments to create and protect greenways along the Roanoke River and its tributaries; ^ Implementation of the process to create a regional stormwater management plan for the Roanoke Valley; and ^ Continuation of various intergovernmental meetings and projects, including quarterly meetings with other local governing bodies and leadership in the statewide Urban Partnership project. WHEREAS, Mr. Minnix also worked diligently during his term to represent all the citizens of Roanoke County and to promote regional projects which would benefit all the residents of the Roanoke Valley. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, does hereby extend its deepest appreciation to H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix for his service as Chairman during 1995 and for his belief in democracy and participation by citizens in local government. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and 1 ^ ~ ~ - •. carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Resolutions of Appreciation File D. Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources 2 ,., C-/ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 9, 1996 RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION TO H. ODELL ~'FUZZY~~ MINNIX FOR HIS SERVICE AS 1995 CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WHEREAS, H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix served as Chairman of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors during 1995; and WHEREAS, during Mr. Minnix's term as Chairman, the County achieved a variety of accomplishments, including: o Completion of the Spring Hollow Water System, including installation of water transmission lines serving the Southwest Roanoke County area; o Initiation of a joint project among the Valley governments to create and protect greenways along the Roanoke River and its tributaries; o Implementation of the process to create a regional stormwater management plan for the Roanoke Valley; and o Continuation of various intergovernmental meetings and projects, including quarterly meetings with other local governing bodies and leadership in the statewide Urban Partnership project. WHEREAS, Mr. Minnix also worked diligently during his term to represent all the citizens of Roanoke County and to promote regional projects which would benefit all the residents of the Roanoke Valley. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, does hereby extend its deepest appreciation to H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix for his service as Chairman during 1995 and for his belief in democracy and participation by citizens in local government. ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~ "~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 9, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Recognition by the Virginia Association of Counties to Bob L. Johnson for Ten Years of Service as a Supervisor COIINTY ADMINISTRATORS COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Each year the Virginia Association of Counties recognizes elected officials who have served their government for at least ten years. At the November annual meeting, Supervisor Bob Johnson was recognized for his ten years of service as a member of the Board of Supervisors. At the meeting, Supervisor Johnson will be presented with a Certificate recognizing this achievement. Submitted by: ~ ,~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Harrison Johnson Minnix Nickens C ° ~~ AT A REGULAP: MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 9, 1996 RESOLUTION 010996-2 OF APPRECIATION TO THE MEMBERS OF THE ROANORE COUNTY VISIONING STEERING COMMITTEE WHEREAS, in March 1995, the Roanoke County Board of Supervi- sors created a Visioning Steering Committee to guide the process of providing a vision for Roanoke County in the year 2010 which could be used as a sX>ringboard for updating the County's Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, 'The Board of Supervisors appointed members to this committee from a variety of areas of the Roanoke Valley, represent- ing various communities, professions and interests; and WHEREAS, i:he Steering Committee met 18 times, and spent over 45 hours in creating and guiding the visioning process; and WHEREAS, the members of the Steering Committee also met with the focus group:a, spending additional time and effort in creating the vision statements for the individual topics in the report; and WHEREAS, t:he Steering Committee was successful in completing a report which represents the input of over 300 citizens and creates a blueprint for the future of Roanoke County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia does hereby extend its deepest appreciation to Jim Sears, Chairman, and the members of the Visioning Steering Committee: Ron Adkins, Evelyn Ball, Rupert Cutler, Barbara Duerk, Joan Furbish, Eldon Rarr, Martha Mackey, Roger O'Dell, Winton Shelor, Phyllis Tilden, Rick Whitney, Robert Williams, and Don Witt for their time, energy, enthusiasm and 1 creativity in providing a plan for the future of the County; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors looks forward to beginning the implementation process of the vision of Roanoke County as developed by the Visioning Steering Committee. On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: t~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Resolutions of Appreciation File 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~" AT A REGULAF2 MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 9, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution and Certificates of Appreciation for Vision Steering Committtee Members COUNTY ADMINIS'PRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: After ten months of diligent work guiding the Roanoke County Vision Process it is appropriate to thank the fourteen citizen members of the Steering Committee for their dedicated efforts in long-range strategic planning. Respectfully Submitted, Janet Scheid, Planner Department of Planning and Zoning Approved, i ~~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Vote No Yes Abs Eddy Harrison Johnson Minnix Nickens C-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 9, 1996 RESOLUTIOIN OF APPRECIATION TO THE MEMBERS OF THE ROANORE COUNTY VISIONING STEERING COMMITTEE WHEREAS, in March 1995, the Roanoke County Board of Super- visors created a Visioning Steering Committee to guide the process of providing a~ vision for Roanoke County in the year 2010 which could be used eis a springboard for updating the County's Comprehen- sive Plan; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors appointed members to this committee from a variety of areas of the Roanoke Valley, represent- ing various communities, professions and interests; and WHEREAS, the Steering Committee met 18 times, and spent over 45 hours in creating and guiding the visioning process; and WHEREAS, the members of the Steering Committee also met with the focus groL~ps, spending additional time and effort in creating the vision statements for the individual topics in the report; and WHEREAS, the Steering Committee was successful in completing a report which represents the input of over 300 citizens and creates a bluE:print for the future of Roanoke County. NOW, THEF:EFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisor: does hereby extend its deepest appreciation to Jim Sears, Chairman, and the members of the Visioning Steering Committee: Ron Adkins, Evelyn Ball, Rupert Cutler, Barbara Duerk, Joan Furbish, Eldon Rarr, Martha Mackey, Roqer O'Dell, Winton Shelor, Phyllis Tilden, Rick Whitney, Robert Williams, and Don Witt for their time, energy, enthusiasm and creativity in providing a plan for the future of the County; and ~ . ~ ,~ 7 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors looks forward to beginning the implementation process of the vision of Roanoke County as developed by the Visioning Steering Committee. ,, AT A REGULAR. MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 9, 1996 RESOLUTION 010996-3 SUPPORTING THE LOCATION OF THE B'~LUE RIDGE VISITORS CENTER ON THE ROANORE RIVER'. PARKWAY ~-~ WHEREAS the local governments and groups interested in promoting economic development and tourism in the Roanoke Valley have long endorsed the construction of a major tourist visitor information center adjacent to the Blue Ridge Parkway between the parkway's intersections with U.S. 220 and State Route 24; and WHEREAS the National Park Service's planning and environmental impact assessment process associated with construction of the Roanoke River Parkway included detailed consideration of alternative locations for such a visitor center and resulted in the identification of the "best" two sites for this purpose, one on private propert;~ on the north side of the Roanoke River east of the parkway near thE: Roanoke River bridge and the other on public land on the south :aide of the river (on former regional landfill property); and WHEREAS the evolution of the plans for the Roanoke River Parkway resulted in a change in the new parkway's final location from the north :side of the river to the south side of the river, leaving the privately owned visitor center site on the north side of the river inaccessible without the construction of another road connection to the Blue Ridge Parkway, while the publicly owned visitor center ~:ite on the south side of the river will be easily accessed as soon as construction of the Roanoke River Parkway, now 1 r under construction, is completed; and WHEREAS an ad hoc advisory committee comprised of representatives of the National Park Service, Roanoke County, City of Roanoke, City of Salem, Town of Vinton, Roanoke Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau, Fifth Planning District Commission, Salem-Roanoke County Chamber of Commerce, Roanoke Regional Chamber of Commerce, Friends of the Blue Ridge Parkway, the Virginia Division of Tourism, and Virginia's Explore Park recently has concluded that the Blue Ridge Visitor Center should be built on the site on the south side of the river adjacent to the Roanoke River Parkway. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia as follows: 1. That the Board of Supervisors endorses the committee's recommendation for construction of the Blue Ridge Visitor Center on the Roanoke River Parkway, and supports prompt construction of this visitor center at this site; and 2. That the Clerk to the Board transmit this resolution to the members of the United States Congress who represent Roanoke County together with a covering letter acknowledging that the cost of building and operating such a center will be the joint responsibility of the federal government and local entities; and 3. That the Clerk to the Board forward copies of this resolution to the other Roanoke Valley governing bodies requesting that the adopt a similar resolution; and 2 r 4. That the Board of Supervisors supports provision of interim visitor center services in a building eventually destined for another use within Virginia's Explore Park. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File The Honorable John W. Warner, U. S. Senate The Honorable Charles S. Robb, U. S. Senate The Honorable Bob Goodlatte, U. S. House of Representatives The Honorable Rick Boucher, U. S. House of Representatives The Honorable David A. Bowers, Mayor, City of Roanoke The Honorable James Taliaferro, Mayor, City of Salem The Honorable Charles R. Hill, Mayor, Town of Vinton Joyce Waugh, Economic Development Specialist Dr. Rupert Cutler, Executive Director, Explore Superintendent of the Blue Ridge Parkway Director of Park Services 3 Item No. ~- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: January 9, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Request to adopt a location of the Blue Roanoke River Parkway COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' resolution supporting the Ridge Visitor Center on the Over the last several months, a committee of representatives from the National Park Service, Roanoke County, City of Roanoke, City of Salem, Town of Vinton, Roanoke Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau, Roanoke Regional Chamber of Commerce, Salem-Roanoke County Chamber of Commerce, Fifth Planning District Commission, Virginia Division of Tourism, Virginia's Explore Park and Friends of the Blue Ridge Parkway have been meeting to address the need for a visitor center along the Parkway. The group is now requesting regional support of the Roanoke River Parkway site as the preferred location of the visitor center, which is the consensus of the group and the location that Roanoke County has supported in the past. SUI~II+IARY OF INFORMATION' Recent regional discussions determined that the clear purpose of the visitor center was to serve as a place where Parkway visitors could receive orientation, education and information. This is generally within the original scope and intent of the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) approved in 1992. While other plans have been considered, it was clear that the Record of Decision could be re-visited with this purpose in mind to consider the steps necessary to change the Record of Decision from Site #3 (Hammond Site) to Site #5 (Roanoke River Parkway Site near the former baler building). Site #5 is located on surface deeded National Park Service land along the Roanoke River Parkway, currently under construction, making access and land acquisition non-issues and affording Parkway visitors a commanding scenic view. Congressman Goodlatte's office is researching potential funding sources from previously reprogrammed funds and the Blue Ridge Parkway is researching a fast-track approach to re-visiting and changing the FEIS Record of Decision for the visitor center, including scoping, scheduling and estimated costs for planning and J ~.e.~ ~ ~• compliance for Site #5 (Roanoke River Parkway). A schedule for the planning process is anticpated within the next month and expected to take place over a one to two year period. Funding will be sought from public and private sources and granting organizations. The attached resolution reaffirms Roanoke County's support of the regional group's preferred Site #5 (Roanoke River Parkway) and supports continued actions toward making the Blue Ridge Visitor Center a reality. In the interim, Virginia's Explore Park has agreed to provide Visitor Center services in a building eventually planned for other uses at the park. Resolutions of support have been requested from the organizations and local governments involved in the regional planning effort. To date, resolutions have been received from the Salem-Roanoke County Chamber of Commerce, Town of Vinton, Fifth Planning District Commission, Craig County and the Roanoke Regional Chamber of Commerce. Other jurisdictions and organizations have scheduled action on resolutions at their upcoming meetings this month. FISCAL IMPACT• None. This resolution does not bind the County to any financing commitment at this time. Any funding decisions will be brought back to the Board of Supervisors in the future. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that this resolution and those received from regional groups supporting the Blue Ridge Visitor Center on the Roanoke River Parkway be forwarded to the members of the United States Congress who represent the Roanoke Valley with a cover letter urging continued progress and funding toward this goal. Respectfully submitted by: ~%~~,,~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: Eddy Johnson Harrison Minnix Nickens L -- VISITOR CENTER SITES -VICINITY MAP • N ~, ~ IW ~ N 1 ~ VISITOR CENTER SITE /~ . i • C 1 • `~ _~ ~" h~ RT. lid y ~,, ~ 1 ~ ~~ ~~• ~~ •' \ VESITOR CENTERt ~ / ` ~ NIAGARA ~ RKWAY OA4 _ ~~_~.~,• • R,~! PA ~• 1 IANOiIII ~ ~• ~, lo;C:O00000 ~ uc ~~ VC4 VC5 ~ '' _ ~ ~ 654 o O O O / ~ ' ~ NOTL• TTKt! CONClPTUAL iK[TCN[• IOR VNi1TOR C[NTlR HT[t ~~ •~~ ~ W!A! -ROVRN!D /Y TN! NATpNAE PARK fERVK:! 1011 ANAlY11l. _ Q7t- t^~ 1 O O TNEbE bKETCNES ARE -RELMWARY ANO SUEJECT TO CHANGE. VISITOR CENTER SITE Z VISITOR CENTER SITE 3 T ~ PROPOSED ACTION ,~ -~ PARKWAY /,~ ~ VISITOR CENTER 2 ~ ~ MRI(WAY ~•` / SVt ~~~~~ / ~ ` .\ ~ O '/ Q p •/ ~.~ ~ _ ~ -/ O ~ I VISITOR ~ e V = \CEHTER T m \ ~ 1 j qo k N w4 ~ 4T~~F? T VISITOR CENTER SITE 4 ~ VISITOR CENTER SITE 5 ~1 11 Il ~ CONNp \ ~ C'O 1 a ~` \ 9 ` 3 3 ~. \ ~ \ . ,g \ 9 \ N 0 ~ 07y 7O \ O VISITOR '*i° \ - ~_ _~ CENTERS '~ 4f ~ U F ~L JNOKf RIVER r PARKWAY ~ R A7! PS T f1 ~ + ' o VISITOR N~T1VE3 1 A A CON~AO OR J' __ _ gkW ~ 4- ° ° ~ ~_ ~ _~ CENTER ~ '' , RT. •11 / q\ ' ? t1/ ~~•~ •~ ~• ~~ RT. {31 I~ • pT. {f/ SCALE r soo• loor lsoo• United States Department of the Interior National Park Service 601.40,044B•DSC•January 92 Visitor Center Sites Roanoke River Parkway Blue Ridge Parkway .~ L-1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 9, 1996 RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE LOCATION OF THE BLUE RIDGE VISITORS CENTER ON THE ROANORE RIVER PARKWAY WHEREAS the local governments and groups interested in promoting economic development and tourism in the Roanoke Valley have long endorsed the construction of a major tourist visitor information center adjacent to the Blue Ridge Parkway between the parkway's intersections with U.S. 220 and State Route 24; and WHEREAS the National Park Service's planning and environmental impact assessment process associated with construction of the Roanoke River Parkway included detailed consideration of alternative locations for such a visitor center and resulted in the identification of the "best" two sites-for this purpose, one on private property on the north side of the Roanoke River east of the parkway near the Roanoke River bridge and the other on public land on the south side of the river (on former regional landfill property); and WHEREAS the evolution of the plans for the Roanoke River Parkway resulted in a change in the new parkway's final location from the north side of the river to the south side of the river, leaving the privately owned visitor center site on the north side of the river inaccessible without the construction of another road connection to the Blue Ridge Parkway, while the publicly owned visitor center site on the south side of the river will be easily accessed as soon as construction of the Roanoke River Parkway, now under construction, is completed; and i WHEREAS an ad hoc advisory committee comprised of representatives of the National Park Service, Roanoke County, City of Roanoke, City of Salem, Town of Vinton, Roanoke Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau, Fifth Planning District Commission, Salem-Roanoke County Chamber of Commerce, Roanoke Regional Chamber of Commerce, Friends of the Blue Ridge Parkway, the Virginia Division of Tourism, and Virginia's Explore Park recently has concluded that the Blue Ridge Visitor Center should be built on the site on the south side of the river adjacent to the Roanoke River Parkway. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia as follows: 1. That the Board of Supervisors endorses the committee's recommendation for construction of the Blue Ridge Visitor Center on the Roanoke River Parkway, and supports prompt construction of this visitor center at this site; and 2. That the Clerk to the Board transmit this resolution to the members of the United States Congress who represent Roanoke County together with a covering letter acknowledging that the cost of building and operating such a center will be the joint responsibility of the federal government and local entities; and 3. That the Clerk to the Board forward copies of this resolution to the other Roanoke Valley governing bodies requesting that the adopt a similar resolution; and 4. That the Board of Supervisors supports provision of interim visitor center services in a building eventually destined for another use within Virginia's Explore Park. A-010996-4 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE HOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 9, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: 1996 Appointments of Board Members to Committees, Commissions and Boards COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Attached is a list of the Committee Assignments. The only proposed changes from 1995, are those appointments of the Chairman and Vice Chairman to committees. The open appointments are those previously held by Supervisor Kohinke. At this time, the Board of Supervisors may make any modifications they wish. Many of the appointments are for specific terms and those appointments should be made at the expiration of the terms. Listed below is information about several of the Committees: Liaisons to the Vircrinia Association of Counties In 1994, VACo requested that a member of the governing body be appointed to interact directly with VACo regarding legislative matters. At a 1994 meeting, The Board recommended that the Vice Chairman of the Board of Supervisors serve in this capacity. However, any Board member may be appointed. In 1992, VACo requested that a member of the governing body be appointed to work directly with the regional representative on the VACo Board of Directors. The Chairman has served in this capacity for several years, but any Board member may be appointed. Roanoke Valley Economic Development Partnership The Chairman of the Board of Supervisors serves on this organization. Therefore Chairman Bob Johnson should be appointed to this position. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve the 't -. necessary appointments for calendar year 1995. ,~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator C--- ~ ------------- --------------------- ACTION ---------------------- -------- VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Motion by Bob L. No Yes Absent Denied ( ) Johnson to confirm a ppointments Eddy x Received ( ) carried by unanimous voice vote Harrison x Referred ( ) Johnson x To ( ) Minnix x Nickens x (1) Fenton F. Harrison appointed to Fifth Planning District Commission replacing H. Odell Minnix. (2) H. Odell Minnix appointed to the Audit Committee replacing Edward G. Kohinke, Sr. cc: File Committee Book BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS 1996 LEE B. EDDY -- Clean Valley Council (2-year term expires 6/30/97) -- Fifth Planning District Commission (3-year term expires 6/30/96) -- 5PDC, Rural Transportation Advisory Committee (Bus/Citizen) -- Recycling Advisory Committee FENTON F. HARRISON -- Fifth Planning District Commission (3-year term expires 6/30/98) BOB L. JOHNSON -- Audit Committee -- Roanoke Regional Airport Commission (4-year term expires 2/10/98) -- Total Action Against Poverty Board of Directors (2-year term expires 5/5/96. BLJ appointed Mrs. Elizabeth Stokes as his designee.) -- Virginia Association of Counties Liaison (As Chairman) -- Roanoke Valley Economic Development Partnership_(As Chairman) H. ODELL MINNIX -- Audit Committee -- Social Services Advisory Board (4-year term expires 8/1/98) HARRY C. NICRENS -- Court Community Corrections Policy Board (3-year term expires 12/31/97) -- Roanoke Valley Regional Cable Television Committee -- Roanoke County Cable Television Committee -- Legislative Liaison to Virginia Association of Counties As Vice-Chairman) . ~ - ~ ~-a. PROPOSED BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS 1996 LEE B. EDDY -- Clean Valley Council (2-year term expires 6/30/97) -- Fifth Planning District Commission (3-year term expires 6/30/96) -- 5PDC, Rural Transportation Advisory Committee (Bus/Citizen) -- Recycling Advisory Committee FENTON F. HARRISON BOB L. JOHNSON -- Audit Committee -- Roanoke Regional Airport Commission (4-year term expires 2/1o/9s) -- Total Action Against Poverty Board of Directors (2-year term expires 5/5/96. BLJ appointed Mrs. Elizabeth Stokes as his designee.) -- Virginia Association of Counties Liaison (As Chairman) -- Roanoke Valley Economic Development Partnership (As Chairman) H. ODELL MINNIX -- Social Services Advisory Board (4-year term expires 8/1/98) HARRY C. NICRENS -- Court Community Corrections Policy Board (3-year term expires 12/31/97) -- Roanoke Valley Regional Cable Television Committee -- Roanoke County Cable Television Committee -- Legislative Liaison to Virginia Association of Counties As Vice-Chairman) OPEN APPOINTMENTS -- Audit Committee lJA ASSC~C OF COUNTIES Fax~£~C47880083 Dec 1G '95 2033 P.01~~01 VIRGINIA ASSOCIATION OF COUNTTES ~~ 1001 East Broad Sixeet + Suite 1/L 20 • Richzxiond, ~lirgirua 23219-1928 + (804) 788-6552 • fax (804} 78$-(}0$3 To. County Chiet Administrative Ufficers From: Jinn Casnpbcll, Executive Director Subj.: Governor's Recommended l?`Y 199-8 Budget; Board Qrganization amd Designation of Lcgisla~ivc Cuutiaots far I9~6 llate: lJecember 1J, J.995 Governor's X99698 Budget VACo staff atren~lP~i a hrirfing ~-esterday on the Governor's proposed budget for the 1996-9$ biennium and later sat down with representatives from Planning and Budget to go over some of cliC details. Our first rcaeuon is that tlYe budget is relatively favorable to local governments. Ellen Davenport of the staff is analyzing the budget and preparing a summary to be mailed out to all counties ui a few days. rf you have any questions, please do not li~+itatc w X11 lip ~~ ~(Q04) 343- 2503. Rnnrd l~rgdnxratxon and Desi~natxon of Le~irlarive Conturts}nr X996 When your new board organizes in 1990, please designate a legislative contact rvho will work witkz VACo durix~ the upconxing Geaeral Assembly session. VACo haS SUCCessfully uulizCd a [1CLWUr~ Ul !O~ C1CGtCd OI17C1~3 83 1Cg191.1tx`/e COritSCts and found them to be quite useful. The legislative contacts provided a wealth of experience and contacts for the VACo staff, and supported and strengthened VACo's lobbying efforts. Ideally, the legislative contact should be an individual with a working knowledge o#~ the state's legislative process :uad with good relarinnshiP,s with your General Assembly delcgatiozi_ He or she should be willing to devote the timt co follow up on lCey legislation wikh members of your delegation and aisu UC Wiliiug if iicccssary' to appear in Richmond to testify on issues of critical importance do VACo. Plcasc fait the following; to Linda Butterfield at 'VACo, (804) 788-0083 once your board has organized. To verify our records, please list each of your 1996 supervisors and indicate position. Fast to Linda Butterfield at (804) 788 0083. ROANOKE County (Five Members) 1/16/96 Bob L . Johnson (chair) F 'son, Jr . Harry C. Nckens (legislative contact) Supervisor Harry~_N;ckPns (viceehair) H. Ode " zz " , Supervisor T.ee B. Eddy, SLp_~~visor i h L -3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 9, 1996 RESOLUTION 010996-5 RATIFYING THE DECLARATION OF A LOCAL EMERGENCY FOR THE COUNTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA DUE TO DANGEROUS WEATHER CONDITIONS WHEREAS, the Director of Emergency Services declared, with the consent of the Board of Supervisors, a local emergency on January 6, 1996, and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia does hereby find that due to heavy snow and blizzard conditions on January 6 and 7, 1996, the County of Roanoke is facing dangerous winter weather conditions, and WHEREAS, due to the heavy snow, a condition of extreme peril of life and property necessitates the proclamation of the existence of an emergency; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY PROCLAIMED that an emergency now exists throughout Roanoke County, and said declaration of emergency is hereby ratified and confirmed, and IT IS FURTHER PROCLAIMED AND ORDERED that during existence of said emergency the powers, functions, and duties of the Director of Emergency Services and the Fire and Rescue Department of the County of Roanoke shall be those prescribed by State law and the ordinances, resolutions and approved plans of the County of Roanoke in order to mitigate the effects of said emergency. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: 1 1 AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Thomas C. Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue Department Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant Administrator Emergency Operations Center, Richmond 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JANUARY 9, 1996 ORDINANCE 010996-6 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 1.146-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 3142 BRAMBLETON AVENUE (TA% MAP NO. 77.10-2-6) CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1 AND C-1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1 AND C-2, WITH CONDITIONS, UPON THE APPLICATION OF MARIA SAYERS -~ WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on October 24, 1995, and the second reading and public hearing were held December 12, 1995; action resulted in a tie vote with one Supervisor absent and this issue was continued until January 9, 1996; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on November 6, 1995; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 1.146 acres, as described herein, and located at 3142 Brambleton Avenue (Tax Map No. 77.10-2-6) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-1 and C-1, Low Density Residential District and Office District, to the zoning classification of R-1 and C-2, Low Density Residential District and General Commercial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Marta Sayers. 1 3. That the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts: (1) That the use of the property will be limited to: (A) All uses permitted in a C-1 District. (B) Personal service uses as set forth in C-2, provided further that personal service uses shall be further limited by the exclusion of the following uses: grooming of pets, seamstress, tailoring, shoe repair, florists, laundromats and dry cleaning stations. (2) The hours of operation shall be limited to 8:30 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and 8:30 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. on Saturday. (3) No modifications will be made to the exterior of the premises except for normal and routine maintenance. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at an iron pin designated (1) on the southerly side of Brambleton Avenue (80 feet wide) which point is corner to property of William & Elizabeth B. Watts (Tax Parcel 77.10-2- 32); thence leaving Brambleton Avenue and with the line of said Watts, S. 48 deg. 59' 00" E. 267.05 feet to an old pin designated (2) on line of property of Theodore J. Shulkcum, III and Kathy S. Shulkcum (Tax Parcel 77.10-2-35); thence with the same S. 22 deg. 13' 00" W. 43.38 feet to a pin set at (3); thence leaving Shulkcum and with two new lines, S. 77 deg. 23' 38" W. 121.36 feet to a pin set at (14); thence S. 53 deg. 07' 59" W. 159.78 feet to a pin set at (6) on the line of property of John L. Eby, Jr., et ux. (Tax Parcel 77.10-2-9); thence with the same N. 38 deg. 23' 46" W. 30.28 feet to an old pin at (7); thence N. 89 deg. 58' 37" W. 114.15 feet to an old pin at (8) corner to property of A. T. Williams Oil Co., Inc. (Tax Parcel 77.10-2-5); thence with the same N. 37 deg. 22' 53" E. 105.39 feet to an old pin at (9); thence N. 52 deg. 24' 43" E. 91.56 feet to an old pin at (11); thence N. 34 deg. 18' 2 39" W. 23.13 feet to an old pin at (12); thence N. 42 deg. 15' 39" W. 72.14 feet to an old pin at (13) on the southerly side of said Brambleton Avenue; thence with the same N. 54 deg. 32' 39" E. 28.98 feet to the Place of Beginning and being New Tract "7A" containing 1.146 acres. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix A COPY TESTE: ,~ • c./ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 3 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER T AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 9, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance to rezone 1.146 acres from R-1 and C-1 to R-1 and. C-2 to operate a personal services facility located at 3143 Brambleton Avenue, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Marta Sayers COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: At the December 12, 1995 Board hearing was held on the petition on Brambleton Avenue to operate of Supervisors meeting, a public of Marta Sayers to rezone property a personal services facility. The staff presented the Planning Commission's recommendation, the attorney for the petitioner made a presentation and citizens had an opportunity to voice their support or opposition. Following citizen comments, the public hearing was closed and Supervisor Minnix moved to deny the request The motion ended in a tie vote, with Supervisor Nickens absent. Since there was a tie vote with one member absent, the Code of Virginia, Section 15.1- 540, states "..in any case in which there shall be a tie vote on any question when all members are not present, the question shall be passed by till the next meeting, when it shall again be voted upon even though all members are not present..." SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Supervisor Nickens has been provided with the video of the meeting and the Board Report presented to the Board of Supervisors, and he will have access to the same information that was presented at the December 12 meeting. Supervisor Harrison, although not on the Board in December, attended the meeting and heard the presentation and citizen comment. Therefore, there will be no need for additional public comment. At this meeting, the Board of Supervisors is only being asked to make a decision on the rezoning request. F/ STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors resolve the tie vote on the pending motion made by Supervisor Minnix to deny the rezoning request at the December 12, 1995 meeting. c~~~ Elmer C. Hodge ~((( '' County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Eddy Harrison Johnson Minnix Nickens l . .. PETIT~~3NER: MARTA SAYERS '~ CASE NUMBER: 41-11/95 ~~ Planning Commission Hearing Date: November 6, 1995 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: November 21, 1995 A. REQUEST and Continued to December 12, 1995 Petition of Marta Sayers to rezone 1.146 acres from R-1 & C-1 to R-1 & C-2 to operate a personal services facility, located at 3142 Brambleton Avenue, Cave Spring Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS Ellen Holtzman asked the Commission to deny the request. She stated that the residents of Greenwood Forest (a single family residential area) do not deserve to have their property values and their way of life ruined. The C-2 zoning will open the way for abuse to our single family residential neighborhood. The Commission asked why she did not attend the meeting concerning the proposal. Ms. Holtzman replied that she and her husband spent over a hour with a representative from Boone & Co. who explained the project. After listening to him, we decided that we were opposed to a day spa. Irwin Holtzman voiced opposition to the request and commented that in addition to the visit from Boone & Co., they received a detailed letter from Evelyn Krippendorf (seller of the property), and several telephone calls from Betsy Settles, another real estate agent. He indicated they are familiar with the project. He said that a C-2 zoning would destroy the character of their neighborhood. Mickey Johnson expressed concern as to the future of the property if the rezoning is approved and the business fails. And should the business succeed, there will be increased traffic and noise. Also our view will be adversely affected. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION Mr. Robinson announced that he would be abstaining from all discussion and action on this petition due to a possible conflict of interest. In response to questions from the Commission, staff said that electrolysis is not a licensed profession in Virginia; by way of proffers, the applicant is limiting the use to personal improvement services and personal services and the retail sale of products that are incidental to these services; personal services (beauty salon, barber shop, etc.) require a C-2 zoning designation; the property fronting on Brambleton is zoned C-2 rather than C-1 as shown on the map. The Commission asked the applicant what would happen should the business fail. Patricia Crockett who will manage the business said that they have been doing electrolysis in the city for 7 years and it seems to be a viable business. ~ .. D. Plt~3FFERED CONDITIONS ~'" ...' 1~ ~~ 1) Permitted uses on the subject property will be limited to those uses currently permitted under the existing C-1 zoning (copy of which is attached hereto) as well as personal improvement services permitted in the C-2 zoning district. 2) Applicant also intends to sell personal improvement books, products and items that are incidental and related to the various personal services that will be offered to their clients including skins, nail and hair care products as well as clothing and accessories related to these personal services. It is expressly stipulated that these retail sales will be an accessory use of the property, incidental and subordinate to the principal use of the building as a day spa and clinic offering skin, hair and nail care, electrology, massage therapy and color consultation. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Witt commented that the proposed activity is not that bad but he is concerned that it will eat away a section that must remain a low intense use area because of its adjacency to the neighborhood and its adjacency away from the commercial use below on Brambleton. Although certain uses are proffered, if C-2 zoning is approved it would set a precedence for other C-2 uses. And because of this I feel these three buildings must remain C-1; therefore, I move to recommend denial of the petition. Ms. Hooker concurred with Mr. Witt and stated that this commercial area has encroached on a neighborhood and said she will not support a more intense C-2 use. The motion carved with the following roll call vote: AYES: Hooker, Witt, Thomason NAYS: Ross ABSTAIN: Robinson F. DISSEN"I'IIVG PERSPECTIVE Mr. Ross noted that the hours of operation (10 a.m. to 6 p.m.) would not be much of a change from the doctors' office which was previously at the site. Also the proffers limit the use for personal services and therefore he would not be supporting the motion. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map Staff Report _ Other Terrance Roanoke Commission W- ' STAFF REPORT PART 1 PETITION: Dr. Marta Sayers PREPARED BY: Jon Hartley FILE NO.: 41-11/95 DATE PREPARED: October 31,1995 A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The petitioner, Dr. Marta Sayers,is requesting to rezone property at 3142 Brambleton Ave. to C-2 to establish a day spa clinic offering a variety of personal care and improvement services. The property is topographically removed from Brambleton Ave. and, along with two other offices, is located directly adjacent to a single family residential development. Further intensification of the commercial activity on the subject property is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and could adversely affect the adjacent residential area. B. DESCRIPTION The petitioner, Dr. Marta Sayers, is requesting to rezone a 1.146 acre parcel at 3142 Brambleton Avenue from C-1, Office district, to C-2 General Commercial district. The purpose of the request is to convert the existing law offices to a day spa clinic, which would include an electrolysis clinic (hair removal), a hair and nail salon, massage therapy, and other personal care related services as the need and demand arise. The property is located in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS The present C-1 zoning allows a wide range of office uses including legal and medical offices. The proposed day spa clinic would be classified as a personal service under the zoning ordinance, which is only allowed in C-2 districts. The C-2, General Commercial district allows a wide range of retail commercial activities in addition to restaurants, gas stations, new auto sales, and similar uses. Additional approval from the Health Department will be required for massage therapy as required under the County Code. Site Plan Review and approval would not be required and no VDOT approval is necessary since only a change in use is proposed. ~-f ~--i- PART I I _ A. BACKGROUND The structure involved was built in 1956 as a single family residence. In 1976 the property was rezoned for a medical office. At that time a 50 foot strip was left as R-1 to maintain a buffer between the office and residential uses. In 1987 a request was considered to rezone additional property to the office district in order to expand the building and provide necessary parking. This request was strongly opposed by the residents and denied by the Board. Since then, the 50-foot strip has been the focus of a zoning enforcement action. In addition, staff proposed to remove the 50-foot strip in 1992 during the Comprehensive rezoning in favor of standardized buffer requirements. This change, however, vas rejected by the Board of Supervisors. Since the property was rezoned for offices in 1976 a dental office has been constructed on the premises, along with a second structure that has been used as a counseling center. The original medical offices have since relocated down the street and the original house has been converted to law offices. Finally, the area has been resubdivided to give each of the structures a separate lot, with cross easements for access and parking. This plat was approved by the County in December 1994 and recorded in April 1995. B. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Site Characteristics The property in question is located on a plateau area that sits approximately 20 to 30 feet above the grade of Brambleton Avenue. It contains three structures; the building proposed to be a day spa clinic along with the dental office and the counseling center. Access to the plateau is provided by a driveway from Brambleton that is shared by all three buildings. There are 17 parking spaces directly in front of the present law office building and approximately 10 to 12 other spaces near the dentist office and counseling center. Otherwise the site is heavily wooded with large specimen trees, creating a quiet compact mini-campus atmosphere to the location. (See attached survey of the property.) Adioinina and Surroundino Neighborhood West of the property along Brambleton Avenue is a vacant lot that is zoned C-2. This lot has not been developed due to its shallow configuration. To the north and east the property adjoins single family residences. The property generally to the south is wooded vacant land that is zoned R-1. The general character of the area consists of the commercial uses along Brambleton Avenue, with almost exclusively single family residences for property not fronting on this corridor. Petition: Dr. Marta Sayers 2 File No.: 41-11/95 1~~ eneraiy the property in question sits above and is removed from the more intensive commercially zoned strip along Brambleton Ave and is more closely associated with 'he residential development that adjoins the property to the south. Certainly, the present C-1 zoning and resulting office uses provide a suitable buffer between these residences and the more intensive commercial uses typical of Brambleton Ave. C. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Prooosed Use and Lavout The applicant is proposing to operate a day spa clinic that will provide a variety of personal care services including electrolysis, hair and nail care, massage therapy, health and fitness information programs, skin care, and similar services. The applicant has indicated that these services would be provided to business and professional women by a professional staff of registered nurses and other licensed professionals in a more clinical environment than those services can now be found in the Valley (see attached description of the proposed use). While :here are currently no licensing requirements for electrolysis in Virginia, beauticians are licensed by the State, and Massage Therapy must be licensed through the Health Department. The proposed use, classified as a personal service, requires the rezoning to C-2, General Commercial. To attempt to make their request more acceptable, the applicant has proffered as a condition that the only uses permitted would be personal improvement services and personal services (along with the retail sale of incidental items associated with these uses) and those uses otherwise now allowed in the C-1 zoning district. At this time no change in the site design or layout is proposed. The existing improvements would appearto be adequate to accommodate the current and proposed uses. Traffic Generation & Access There are no figures available for the types of uses involved in this proposed change in zoning. The most intensive use currently permitted is the medical office that can generate moderate amounts of traffic and demand for parking. Public Services This property is presently served by public sewer and water.. Fire and Rescue services would be provided by the Cave Spring Rescue Squad and Fire Station located on Brambleton Ave southwest of the site. C. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The property in question is designated within both the Transition and Neighborhood Petition: Dr. Marta Sayers 3 File No.: 41-11/95 ~~^~ .. ~_ Conservation land use category in the 1985 Co„~prehensive Plan. The proposed rezoning v~rould be inconsistent with the plan map and policies for areas designated Neighborhood Conservation. In those areas c~signated Transition the general commercial uses allowed by the C-2 district would be inconsistent with the plan policies, although personal services would be moderately compatible. A request to modify the comprehensive plan designation to expand the former medical offices on this property was denied in 1987 due to the property's proximity and relationship to the surrounding residential uses. D. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS The subdivision of this property was approved by the County's subdivision agent based on the historical configuration of the lots and the fact that no lot was being resubdivided which was less conforming with the zoning requirements. No further approvals, waivers or variances under the subdivision ordinance are necessary at this time. PART III STAFF CONCLUSIONS The property in question is located so as to functionally capitalize on access from Brambleton Avenue, yet retain a degree of privacy for patrons of the offices now on the property. This is the very attribute which attracted the applicant to this property. However, this privacy is also afforded in part because of the property's close association topographically with single family residences located behind this and the other office buildings associated with this property. Use of this property for more intensive commercial uses, even with the conditions on use, would be contrary to the County's Comprehensive Plan and would, in the opinion of staff, negatively affect the surrounding residences. When this property was rezoned in 1976 it was strongly opposed by residents as an encroachment of commercial uses into a single family residential area. This position was restated by the residents in 1987 when the medical offices wanted to expand and at that time the residents' postition was supported by the Board of Supervisors. This denial is consistent with other similar requests to expand commercial uses into adjacent residential areas along the Brambleton Avenue corridor . Petition: Dr. Marta Sayers 4 File No.: 41-1 1 /95 ~~ ~ ~~ The undersiane~ owner arc applicant vol,~n tGri'~.y proffer the following conditions ~o their Yezoning request: 1. Permitted uses on the subject property will be: limited to those uses currently ?ermitted under the existing C-1 zoning (copy of which is attac~:ed hereto) as well as personal improvement services and personal services permitted in the C-2 zoning district. 2. Applicant a.so intends to sell personal improvement books, products and items :.hat are incidental and related to the various personal services that will be offered to their clients including skin, nail and hair care products as well as clothing and accessories related to these personal services. It is expressly stipulated that these retail sales will be an accessory use of the property, incidental and subordinate to the principal use of the building as a day spa and clinic offering skin, hair and nai~_ care, electrology, massage trerapy and color consultation. ISLAND S~.7N DEVELOPMENT GR~UP, owner BY: ~" / TITLE : ~, _ 7~~ ~G/~ C c:t., ~l Marta Sayers, applica t .-r~ .. t ' . `\ . _~, ~ DEPT. 0= PL^,".':~.,.: r;,ti'G - ,I~.~ i~ -~ t ~ f 520 Eernzrc D ~ '~~~ F.O. 6cx L~S^v0 ~~ ~ \r~3~ ~ Foanoke, V,: 201 E t 51d 772-2osa ,~., c ~~.~ ;- -2t~~3 ., ~.: ~l/y 1 ~~~ ~ / a~^iicaci,~n _.n_~ cry: ft ~fi~.cr- ~---- ~r~~l`;5~ ;.laeards issues: _ 5 ea:a: (/ ZI~ ~ `xF ~ v ~ /`'S I ~.dsC NUT~C G.': ~i~_ %i 9~ Owner's name: Island Sun Development Group /Evelyn Krippendorf 'address: P.O. Box 21823 Roanoke, VA 24018 Fhone: 772-2500 Zip Ccde: 24018 j'-ocation of property: Tax Map Number: 77 10-2-6 County of Roanok , e southerly side of Brambleton Ave. ~,lagisterial District: Cave S rin 3142 B bl g ram eton Ave., S.W. Roanoke, VA Communi; f Planning Area: C'_a~'c. lj ~yt,c..z~C/ Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: C-1 -~ ~.' I 1.146 acres Existing Land Use: Commercial Office Building 49920 sq.fit. ~.. '~"~ _l~~ ... . ~ .. ~ ..t a;~~ P`E t.~ frS~.p .,, :: ~ ,,.... .~-.: t ..:. ter:` `;~:~° ; .::~ . ;,-~: ~ .:~~:..: F ~`A~ ~C',~~'~s5 ~Rf~'~ ..,.:„i ~~~~~~~:::::::: ~ I Proposed Zoning: C-2 ~• ;~_- 4 For Staf! Ust Oniv Proposed Land Use: Personal Services Facility ! use Tva~: €~ I Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, v~icti:, and frontage requirements of the requested distric;? YES x NO IF NO, A V i Ant:-.t:CE 1S REQUIRED FIRST.. Is the applrcation complete? Please check if enc:csed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED I~ A,\Y Oi= THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLE T ~. ws v `' - NS V R12 V / ~ Consultation 8 1i2" x i ~ " cons=p; plan Application fee I Application ~ Metes and bounds description ;-.'r Proffers, if applicable Justification ~~~ ~ ~ Water and sewer application Adjoining property e~.vners l hereby certify that / am either th owner of the pr perry or the owner's agent or conrract purchaser and am acting with the know/e~e~$d~ 1 wn RO P Owner's Signature: BY: '\ O~LI~ ~ ~r~n _ - uavia~c.: Hel~-che~y,-its attorney - r. S ~.`' Usr Gn,v Case l,,~r-roe i.:rJ f.l~:'vr..(:!(~'v::--~:.4 1'.~Zi~.Z~`:'1.. ~.iJ'~ ~r~....1r`+~ .~.j~ Y=['T,SfIJ _~trZ~ S./: Applicar.; ".aria Savers The Planning Ccmmission will study rezoning anc s_e:ial use permit reouesa to determine the need and justification forZhe change in terms of public heals=, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the follo~•:in; Questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space it necessary. Please explain how the reoues; fur,hers the purposes c' the ~oning Ordinance iSection 30-3) as welt as ;ne purpose found a: the beginning o' the applicable zoning dis:ri.t classification in the zoning ordinance. Petitioner believes the rezor_ing will further the intent and purposes of the zoning ordinance in that it will encourage economic development activities that provide desirable employment and enlarge the tax space as well as provide a convenient source of personal services not currently available to the public in one location. The proposed use will be consistent with the commercial and professional nature of the properties which surround it. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and• policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. ' The proposed use of this property for providing personal services to professional woman represents an appropriate use of the property, consistent with the guidelines and polices of the comprehensive plan which designate this area as a "transition zone." While the zoning ordinances characterized'tkese.personal services as a commercial endeavor the nature of ~~ •~he • c~.~~ental and the intensity of the use of the facility as well~as t-he hours of operation are consistent with the business-and professional offices which surround it, thereby encouraging economic development without burdening the residential properties which are nearby. Please describe the impact(s) cf the reouest cr. tr.=_ proper ,y itself, the adjoining properies, and the surrouadins area, as well as the impacts on public services a-d ~aciiities, inciudino water/sewer, reads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. The proposed use of the property as a personal services facility will have little or no impact on the property itself, the adjoining property or the surrounding area because there will be no physical change to the facilities and the type of cliental, as well as the intensity of the use of the facility and the hours of operation will be very similar to the existing professional offices currently located on the property. There will be no negative impact on the existing utilities or public facilities for the same reasons as herein identified. ~~ .. ~I ' 4 ~- ; C~ ~i ~ _ C ' g` c~ d Y~w:~$ <z< z~ Q<~;~~ aN~$$9 ~=Y °r ~~~x7 <i~~2 GCM< ~awF~m n F Sz8=`~ YiW =_ 41.I~Q~~ ~F•ax~ r<~;~m 3' $ .°~ FyyF ~ N r • ~ ^ ' ~a k° ~ ;d" +~~' a~' ~~ W ~Y$ ~ ~RYb ~~~~ oat ~I 3~~w ~~~oa ~ , ai ~~~~~ °~~~m ~` o a o- ~ o e- ~" o o "' ~~io~aoooo~s ~+o~ ' 8`i -OO~uaaaoo~~VOO N t„~rn.~~~-~r~~ni~ ~ ~ <~ o i Q L4}~ ooooo~o~~~no Z~ ~ S o<I U ~„ ~ -M1 F M ~~ 5 ~~ r~- b~o i~~1 ~. anti °~xz; Woo N W ~~u ~mi^o lJ a ~ - ~ s~~~os'3~k~;~3~~8 ~o =~z~G obi .a ZF4'~S~f~id'~=C~~S„'~~~ ?re ii ~ i'.~oi~~O~w~ ~s`c~ak~s~~ ~ ~W ~~e.'~s~ ~ ~~~aa Y ` _ < =00 ~-G~~` yOG z S'~B ~FS ~` w ~ .~ 7bp~~~~~~~~~ -~~~ ~D~.gF$~yatlbY~~e N S~ F C°i~C k d o:~ e ~S'is"z~ ~ ~ Q = < ° N ; '~'sm`~ J °= d ~~~~ ~ ~~~~~ „z a i~e~~c, ag ~. o ~o _i o °~°~ I ~i . a .~ -. ~ ~ Sz`L^~ri.-.75 0 a ~- ~~2~ o W v'~u~6Gea~ o N~~• z< of^~o,.~W 4.: ~ O Jf zni~i'a ° \ Z ~~ oo ° Q N ~., z ~ ~ ` N~6 < <a Y O Q u \ F u V ~~ +q ~S e ° Ito y3 S5 ~ E S 3 Y ~~~~yh t~ 3.^vyRa~63 °~b ~~ Y zo Yi. = aw ;:~ ° ~ ~ ~.lF~ ~•3 AA +'1 > a ^<~}~ yy$ ; ~`~g"d=k~6+P ~G~W =~`S o< ~ 3'~C. ~ ~Syy o< ~ ~~- z ; <<o~~ ~ o <F`~~ ~3 '~{0 ~~3z «p~°~~< ~'6 ~° y5~ ~ J`~ a .° Oyu g `s~ . ~wrc.W°°s ~°-° ~ '3Y~ '3~~ aa3 ~ ~~~~~ ~ a~.ol ~~bwyy ~ ~< ow TP J~z ~ j~ r ~ ~@ ~ .7~0~~ '~ e F.S~r CTi;~~7p U~ bi`~ i SzXV z~ ~m rb'u ~ ~•z•I C.Fi ~;~ ~a~~~~o ~~_;b~~~~z~= , ~~ ~ :~:. ~' 3 ago„. - W~g~: ~ ~~_~~ F~~~ fY~a<7~~wz<'bc~o~3~~a k b ~Xu' ~ ~~u; ~ .~3~<_ b '!Sf~o h~~° Y0Y1 ~'S,$yj~~i2S~:rS~~~~g<~bZ ~ ° 8 ~ .. T $ ~" ~ Cg y>~ ~ r oJ~~ w ~:er1 6 ~~a~w~goi~~J~ui~'l ~n"a a ~ k~~w i ~ ~~~~+ a ~'•p~~E y `C~~Si S !~ QQQ°<y «mcn~""" N:a1~..: $' - < 6..b 4 8Cb ~ < ._~ ~`= I 4 < 1..w'i- ~ ~}y~}s„' -~~^)0•~(E~<-~i5~5~~3F ~~i~N \ Xw wi j~3°p ~ ~$°0 O ~~~~ yl ,j ~n ~ •auf~~~~~u~ ~ O~n~C -~~tid ~~y(,ilEobw~ v ~R w=~~ .~ ~~ ~=ff ~ ~ ~7i N _ ~• r~`w'~~i a y~ ~ ~:~"S~y ~~~o~ ~x ~= %e b E h E b ~~.._" ~ .. ~ ~ rya .: ~ g- ° ~ ~_. ~' a ,7~~ ~:' k '~~~ - k J~k~~ ~ k ~7b~~ ~ _~~ ~- ~~aqK~~~ ~ sir ~: ~o ~ w ~~ = ~ . ~:a~'' ~ ~~i~l ~ ~ Y` ~ ~~'i 8 $~ x Y a ~~ ;__ ~ <tl i z . r F~ C~ •:~~~' j^ a T'r~c~aa or may' P'' 7 -~ I Mt ~i ~- ~~. )y ~ 4 ."ti l • 1 ~ b ~ A~ 'x1£1.00 _ /~-~, ~ wtt_~rra DR ~~ ~~ 1 ~~/Zn i .= `_-`jam ~~ `?RiC ; ~ ~ o0 HFYaL~ 1 AD, LE)YS~.' ~'j 9w c`~~a~ ~js,tPJ~°- ~d1~/~Z~ , ~~ O ~ ens ,.., s \\ r~JJ`~.J~'`~+~t~4'.\4~ .~~ .: e" % c E~ i _,~'~ ~~ C ~ ~ ~~ S ~ti , ~ _, Lb~'i7 ~ L 2.1 CG: _E_Ctiy Ma ~,..:: g~:~.r~s_a ~QE _ - ;4:-;;.. ~'~ -- S, ~- ~j `i ~ r r~o ~;;..' ,i ~ ~~ _ _ ~ ~~ HORT}~ 9 3/32 ~ ~ G~ 40 ~ 3rls z ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ -J y `'3,3/36 ~ y Q~ ~~~G j~rs; ' ,~oz - - / ~3/ O ~?~o 'ham ` ~ ~jGT3 ~ :,3063 - /e \\\ .~ ~ 3/3x•• 2 • .s y~ ?~ _ •. ~_ t , ,.. ~~\ - ^_ y7 \~Ch i3 •, V~ 'mil ^~` / _,-'' ' ~~ \ ~ ~~ • -- ~ D .N ~~ / ~ 7 I .~, - "' ~ ~ 3408 - - 1 2 j 'j~• .5 0 •a ,~a~ 1 Yl M S ' I i 1 - T 2 t's~ .. . ~~ t ~. q.• ~' ~ tea, •'/.3~/4 9Z .•~ . - ~ 3212• ~ = > 33 ~ ' 'J ~~ 9 i 28 ~ IJ• _ " ~~ e ~ T 51 s~ ~ 3502 ~ - G 14 ,, _ 32 ~ 3520 1 ,~ '; 26 ,: ~~_ ' S0 '~~ I r. S _ - ~T~ _ DEPaP>Tr~`!'I' OF PIAN,IIr'G MARTA SAYERS .'~- C-1 b R-1 TO C-2 b R-1 arm zorrnvG 77.10-2-6 .,, ~- t . ~-~ ~. 1 '/~+ 1 DEC 12 '95 16 16 FR NRTIONSHANC l10RTGRGE 540 265 3377 TO 99897076 P.02/02 ~~ 'r December 12, 1995 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke, VA Re: 3142 Brambleton Avenue Roanoke, VA 24018 Gentlemen: I am one of the property owners near this property. I support the proposed use of this property as a Day Spa clinic. ncerely, L rusilla A. 3 xt y 3503 Forester Road Roanoke, DA 24015 ** TOTAL PAGE.02 ~ ~/ t ~~ In re: PETITION OF DR. MARTA SAYERS 3142 Brambleton Avenue PROFFERS The undersigned Owners do hereby voluntarily proffer the following conditions to be attached to the rezoning of the subject property from C-1 to C-2: 1. That the use of the property will be limited to: (A} All uses permitted in a C-1 District; (B} Personal service uses as set forth in C-2, provided Further that personal service uses shall be further limited by the exclusion of the following uses: grooming of pets, seamstresses, tailors, shoe repairs, florists, laundromats and dry cleaning stations. 2. That the hours of operation shall be limited to 8:30 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and 8:30 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. on Saturday. 3. That no modifications will be made to the exterior of the premises except for normal an routine mainte nce. /l ~~' ly K . Krip~~~dor / ~ j Carl F? rippe dorf, by Evely K.~ Krippendorf, his attorney-in-fact Evelyn K. Krippendorf ATTORNEY AT LAW 3142 Brambleton Aroe. P.O. Boz 21823 Roanoke, VA 24018 X540) 772-2500 /I .. ~ -1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JANUARY 9, 1996 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 1.146-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 3142 BRAMBLETON AVENUE (TAX MAP NO. 77.10- 2-6) CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1 AND C-1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1 AND C-2, WITH CONDITIONS, UPON THE APPLICATION OF MARTA SAYERS WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on October 24, 1995, and the second reading and public hearing were held December 12, 1995; action resulted in a tie vote with one Supervisor absent and this issue was continued until January 9, 1996; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on November 6, 1995; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 1.146 acres, as described herein, and located at 3142 Brambleton Avenue (Tax Map No. 77.10-2-6) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-1 and C-1, Low Density Residential District and Office District, to the zoning classification of R-1 and C-2, Low Density Residential District and General Commercial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Marta Sayers. 1 F~ 3. That the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts: (1) That the use of the property will be limited to: (A) All uses permitted in a C-1 District. (B) Personal service uses as set forth in C-2, provided further that personal service uses shall be further limited by the exclusion of the following uses: grooming of pets, seamstress, tailoring, shoe repair, florists, laundromats and dry cleaning stations. (2) The hours of operation shall be limited to 8:30 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and 8:30 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. on Saturday. (3) No modifications will be made to the exterior of the premises except for normal and routine maintenance. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at an iron pin designated (1) on the southerly side of Brambleton Avenue (80 feet wide) which point is corner to property of William & Elizabeth B. Watts (Tax Parcel 77.10-2- 32); thence leaving Brambleton Avenue and with the line of said Watts, S. 48 deg. 59' 00" E. 267.05 feet to an old pin designated (2) on line of property of Theodore J. Shulkcum, III and Kathy S. Shulkcum (Tax Parcel 77.10-2-35); thence with the same S. 22 deg. 13' 00" W. 43.38 feet to a pin set at (3); thence leaving Shulkcum and with two new lines, S. 77 deg. 23' 38" W. 121.36 feet to a pin set at (14); thence S. 53 deg. 07' 59" W. 159.78 feet to a pin set at (6) on the line of property of John L. Eby, Jr., et ux. (Tax Parcel 77.10-2-9); thence with the same N. 38 deg. 23' 46" W. 30.28 feet to an old pin at (7); thence N. 89 deg. 58' 37" W. 114.15 feet to an old pin at (8) corner to property of A. T. Williams Oil Co., Inc. (Tax Parcel 77.10-2-5); thence with the same N. 37 deg. 22' 53" E. 105.39 feet to an old pin at (9); thence N. 52 deg. 24' 43" E. 91.56 feet to an old pin at (11); thence N. 34 deg. 18' 2 ~s~ 1 39" W. 23.13 feet to an old pin at (12); thence N. 42 deg. 15' 39" W. 72.14 feet to an old pin at (13) on the southerly side of said Brambleton Avenue; thence with the same N. 54 deg. 32' 39" E. 28.98 feet to the Place of Beginning and being New Tract "7A" containing 1.146 acres. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. rezonesayers 3 l w ~ L } i ~ ' ~~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 9, 1996 RESOLUTION 010996-7 IN SUPPORT OF THE LEGISLATIVE INITIATIVE OF THE CITY OF ROANORE TO CREATE A REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT COMMISSION WHEREAS, on December 11, 1995, the City Council for the City of Roanoke adopted Resolution No. 32771-121195 expressing its intent to join with the County of Roanoke and/or the City of Salem to form a multi-member regional transportation district commission to preserve and expand the mass transit system within the district and to urge the General Assembly to authorize a sales tax of 2% of the retail price of motor vehicle fuels sold within such transportation district; and, WHEREAS, staffs of the City of Roanoke and the County of Roanoke have commenced the development of an agreement to implement the terms and provisions of a transportation district commission for the Roanoke Valley, including the allocation of all the proceeds of said tax derived from each participating jurisdiction to each participating jurisdiction to be used for any transportation purposes, limitations upon incurring expenses, the creation of debt and acquisition of capital assets by said transportation district commission; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses its support for this legislative initiative and for an agreement between the City and County to create a transportation district commission for the Roanoke Valley. BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, 1 i ~' Virginia, as follows: 1) That the County of Roanoke supports the legislative initiative of the City of Roanoke to create a regional transportation district commission and to amend the appropriate sections of the Code of Virginia, (1950), as amended, to permit any transportation district commission established in the Roanoke Valley to obtain all the benefits provided by law, including the authorization of a sales tax of 2% on the retail price of motor vehicle fuels sold within such transportation district. 2 ) That the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors is directed to transmit attested copies of this Resolution to the Clerks of the City Councils of Salem and Roanoke and Town Council of Vinton, and to the members of the General Assembly from the Roanoke Valley. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~' Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney The Honorable John S. Edwards The Honorable Malfourd W. "Bo" Trumbo The Honorable H. Morgan Griffith The Honorable C. Richard Cranwell The Honorable Clifton A. Woodrum The Honorable A. Victor Thomas Carolyn S. Ross, Clerk, Vinton Town Council Forest Jones, Clerk, Salem City Council Mary F. Parker, Clerk, Roanoke City Council 2 .. ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~' °~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 9, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Legislative Program for the 1996 Session of the Virginia General Assembly COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: After meeting with Roanoke City Council on Monday, January 8, 1996, the Board of Supervisors may want to amend its 1996 legislative program to include support for draft legislation to implement a tax of 2% of the retail price of motor vehicle fuels in a transportation district consisting of the City and the County. Staff will prepare an appropriate resolution to be distributed to the Board on January 9, 1996. Respectfully submitted, ~~~~~~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Vote No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by Eddy Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) Harrison Referred Minnix to Nickens general\add96.leg 1 . -.- `` ' !, L r I I AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 9, 1996 RESOLUTION 010996-8 APPROVING THE SUBMISSION OF AN ISTEA TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM APPLICATION FOR THE HANGING ROCK BATTLEFIELD TRAIL, PHASE II BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia: WHEREAS, in accordance with Commonwealth Transportation Board construction allocation procedures, it is necessary that a request by resolution be received from the local government in order that the Virginia Department of Transportation program an enhancement project in the County of Roanoke, Virginia. WHEREAS, a public hearing was duly advertised and held on January 9, 1996 to elicit citizen comment on this project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the County of Roanoke, Virginia, requests the Commonwealth Transportation Board to establish the following improvement project: Hanging Rock Battlefield Trail, Phase II BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the County of Roanoke, Virginia, is assured that the Hanging Rock Battlefield and Railway Preservation Foundation has identified a match of 20% of the total cost for planning and design, right of way, and construction of this project with donated land and easements, private funds, and in-kind services. And, if the County of Roanoke, Virginia, or the Hanging Rock Battlefield and Railway Preservation Foundation subsequently elects to cancel this project, the County of Roanoke, Virginia, and/or the Foundation, hereby agrees to reimburse the Virginia Department of Transportation for the total amount of the 1 ~ J costs expended by the Department through the date the department is notified of such cancellation. On motion of Supervisor Harrison to adopt the resolution as amended by Supervisor Eddy, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Y ~, Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Timothy W. Gubala, Director, Economic Dev and County Representative, Hanging Rock Battlefield and Railway Preservation Foundation Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Commonwealth Transportation Board 2 ... Item No. 1`.~,q"' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: January 9, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Request for approval of resolution endorsing an application for ISTEA funding for Hanging Rock Battlefield Trail, Phase II ~'OUNTY ADMINISTRATORS COMMENTS: ~~~~u~~~ ~~` E%ECIITIVE SUMMARY: The Hanging Rock Battlefield and Railway Preservation Foundation was recently awarded $549,000 of ISTEA funds by the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) to construct the Roanoke Valley's "first" greenway between the Hanging Rock area and the City of Salem. The Foundation has been encouraged by VDOT to complete the plans for the rails-to-trails project that were prepared for the 1995 ISTEA funding cycle. The 1995 grant award did not provide sufficient funding to implement the entire plan. The Foundation has developed a Phase II project list for a 1996 grant application that includes extension of trails along Masons Creek; to the historic Valley railway stone structures in Salem; and to the historic Brubaker house. A footbridge will have to be constructed over Masons Creek. The Foundation will use private funds, in-kind services, donated land, and easements as the 20$ match required by the grant. The estimated project cost for Phase II is between $500,000-$600,000. Fiscal Impact: Since no Roanoke County funds are requested, there is no fiscal impact involved with filing this application for ISTEA funds. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors hold the required public hearing and approve the attached resolution supporting the submission of the grant application. l s r °~'%~'° Respectfully submitted: Approved: r,, l V " - ~i~~'y~" Timothy W. G bala, Director Elmer C. Hodge Department of Economic Development County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Eddy Harrison Johnson Minnix Nickens Attachment l s- ~•~- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 9, 1996 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUBMISSION OF AN ISTEA TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM APPLICATION FOR THE HANGING ROCK BATTLEFIELD TRAIL, PHASE II BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia: WHEREAS, in accordance with Commonwealth Transportation Board construction allocation procedures, it is necessary that a request by resolution be received from the local government in order that the Virginia Department of Transportation program an enhancement project in the County of Roanoke, Virginia. WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke is submitting one project application and has reviewed one additional transportation enhancement project application from the Hanging Rock Battlefield and Railway Preservation Foundation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the County of Roanoke, Virginia, requests the Commonwealth Transportation Board to establish the following improvement project: Hanging Rock Battlefield Trail, Phase II BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the County of Roanoke, Virginia, is assured that the Hanging Rock Battlefield and Railway Preservation Foundation has identified a match of 20$ of the total cost for planning and design, right of way, and construction of this project with donated land and easements, private funds, and in-kind services. And, if the County of Roanoke, Virginia, or the Hanging Rock Battlefield and Railway Preservation Foundation subsequently elects to cancel this project, the County of Roanoke, --~:~ .; ~r/~ Virginia, and/or the Foundation, hereby agrees to reimburse the Virginia Department of Transportation for the total amount of the costs expended by the Department through the date the department is notified of such cancellation. . R . t ~',. - , ~ AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 9, 1996 RESOLUTION 010996-9 REQUESTING THE COMMONWEALTH TRANSPORTATION BOARD TO ESTABLISH A PROJECT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF THE LANDSCAPE AND STREETSCAPE ENHANCEMENT OF FIVE LOCATIONS WHEREAS, in accordance with Commonwealth Transportation Board construction allocation procedures, it is necessary that a request by resolution be received from the local government or state agency in order that the Virginia Department of Transportation program an enhancement project in the County of Roanoke, Virginia, and WHEREAS, a public hearing was duly advertised and held on January 9, 1996 to elicit citizen comment on this project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia requests the Commonwealth Transportation Board to establish a project for the improvement of the Landscape and Streetscape Enhancement of five locations within Roanoke County, three of which are adjacent to Botetourt County. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors hereby agrees to pay 20 percent of the total cost of planning and design, right of way, and construction of this project, and that, if the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors subsequently elects to cancel this project, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors hereby agrees to reimburse the Virginia Department of Transportation for the total amount of the costs expended by the Department through the date the Department is notified of such cancellation. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and 1 carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Commonwealth Transportation Board 2 - ~ ~^ \ - r~ ,.~5 v ~ MAP SHOWING LOCATION OF THREE PROPOSED - _~ - - ,tN~ "GATEWAYS" IN WILLIAMSON ROAD CORRIDOR ~ r 1) PETERS CREEK ROAD/WIWAMSON ROAD 6 ~ .',1~~ 2) PLANTATION ROAD/VIIILLIAMSON ROAD 3) WILLIAMSON ROAD AT BOTETOURT COUNTY LINE ~ _ _ •T /r/ t'~ Y c ~ \~ ~L c~,pF~E~ JJ we e~ o ~\ ~~yy \ ~, •+~- """' f .. ~ ~Sa~ 0~ CoRP.! ~ ~a ;270 J ~,~ L£ ~ O ~~~, ~ !~ \ Cam! ' ~ ~~ ~g'~ Ir"~ CD n- c ~ Pk RA ~~s ~ T QqL J ~ `~ o, ~ ~ ~ IST LL `~'~ Cam:/.~ ; ;..c. R1 ~ v ~~C.CCa~r D~~a1.~ O~pPtR~M~. wA=...v~' =~~~ 0 4i ~ i `~ ~'t7~,~_i ~~~'r/_~ w 1G ~~ cr, a ss ` O ~ otp o ~ 'wOv_\~ .9. ~ 220 ~c ~ s~ 4 r tt~t u+ct ;~ ~' /~ M t s.G ~ \ ti .Cl`~ r^. I~•cJ o~3.~~ .,c . ~.~E+ji pi \~ •~~ 3 00_ ! ._.. ~ 1 ~ _ n O~ +• J - Pesacsa~. ;r8\Q-i ~+^LEiawE'o~ '=b~d'~ `r.~ S~,e-~a 11 ~ f ! .t ~ _. f °eo.~ ' G P pt\ lr:a£:-~ ~Jt P~Rx H , .r5 ~ !` BR CpgREQO OR IGf175 H?WVS d~'p .:: ~~Y os N v~ Xt~ tOOp~~ ~~.tEROEgN VGt{ f^ ` op~r~, ~ O c. ~ GAibNI1N RR S,.:T;OIV Q ~ ~ - ~-` ~y ------- ~-- -- -- C _ _ ---.. S NORTH .• ... EhS__...>~- ....~• NbR UGM~. ..~ A-~AE -- r RQ ~• o ~ ~~x • r '~,~ ``r.. ~9\`m9 o SUMMEROEIIN ~FQ ,~~Q' q~/~'~~, i .- . J . o _ . ,N t~ /:~.a.ss:+;a e+.~NcR) ~ i NNY8Ft00K ~.~~. / 3r ' ( `, *w'rpn~ G ~ ! rQ-. ~JMMER ~ TaN'~•i a ~'' t~5. ~ , .(q~ i~ ~ ! ~ ~ I- ~RF7~Ff1 ~ qNf TRH =o f x280 ~, ~~ ~ t00t~ \Op :1 Q,~~~9N;n^ '•e:':r:E fV/~ RO ~ 11 2 Qr ~ F~i /Wig ~ zp . ~•~c=r.c-~.:i c~ 1 O o ~1.,QVAP7'S` c PLYMOIm~IE~R~ QIL1S~r ~aWi~Eli9"• c T'~, / ~ ~~.~~ COUX~IY ; `~''~ 9 ~ -£t.P'!'/~ PY ~ ~ ~J .4~'a •' ~-. tz; BUHH o .~*AOtJTH ~ No N ,~~, ` '^F, °c BEAU .~ DENT i Q~/SrIEAf ~~ ~ ~ PEZTY PJ \ -r1r5 ~~ Qo MON 0 0 f~ ~r~o . ..•'• '"' I 17~ R '''> R M1/ I if ;.: _ / OEN PLANTgT f N J L_7Cx:N: C~~;a •t• .•: MOUHTA/N . ';" , ~ ~ .CnR~-Y~i1" S AGM Gl. ~ CLUBHOUSE ' ~ ; ~ '9 ~^ ~r~ ~~~ y^ ~cyvwrcN~ . 48 wEW ~ 6G1 ~ 2•~ ~' ~ ~\~1 ~ 1 ~7.e~E~,MUlJ1V4Alrl, oa E EM.SfN. ~ ! ?M •~.~`', COM p f.:::.~'..;.::P BuN![ER I c ~ .t ~ ,.:. `~.. _-~~ANOp -CtR~Y ,.~ ~'aq. . , •,y `a~ J'f;f cA~ ^ 1: ~ TINY TR I Q- ~ '~~ CAPTAINS - R • o '~~ . - ~ o i ° ~j.---~c~`''~O ~ Qc4~l~,orrp~~ i-~--~L i ~<E o/ ~ ~/ '<:.:. '~ •CMARYwGQ'J ~ ~~MYa~a.~9 .7;.`~ °9 ,~NF~-\ y(~` r~ LIA Rpm s+ IaQ_IiJOR r / '. 1 ' P~~~~ / /~ }. A'p ;%,o ~.~ .' .^ANCNOR~ ~O '\ ~' ~ .\ ~~gJ Ol7 616 ~ a°c I iT~ A:~;..::'-:Q r~ 44 ,Z \ y/' yVATE o~~"~ ~ ? \\ i ° :~ ~z ~ ~7~oR .ix o R '•= T ~ J QP~ rf ~A11~7 ~~ G S:.NTEE ::aO...Tyw,w~,~ ~ P~ / ,. r_~w>'.~3~~fs , `~ ~ oa `-' '_..---•-•. 1, ----\' .. ,~ / A~ ; a ~ ~~--- ~ crn.~ ~. "=-----r' 4 N.1_/LE G ~, ~` Ea \ ,7.1 •c~T~.~`.~ ` 1 77 ORLAN-n-O AVID-O;aI.AM+~'~'"i.i~ I . CC _ _ Q• s ~Q- t ,.off,. „s~:::: _' ~..99E!3 EY H LL ___ ~O ~-~' ~R ~~ 'AN n z-'p ° ~ •-- ~ ~_ _ `A ~ ~ . __ ~~ 'ORO7 ~, '%~ •' FO ~ \~"`1N q^^. ER N v ~ ORU-N00° I p~0. ~~.'•. ~ • } 'A~ ~ '.~ ~ /\~ ` tiEUG~ ~ Op ~ a ~ ~ ~ n `Cry :: r - Q B D/ ' ~~ y ffi.~.•_ . z '.09 ~ \,~~ a }MALL <~ ~ p ~~ ~Ni ,~'., ~ ~ ~ ' ~' O~ ~' 118 - - ' , ~\ '' ~ eaooR a ~ ~ ~ h~ ~ ~- 60`_ ,;.0 ~`.'.~~ • _ a, ^o \° ~ l 220 ..t<'~'': ~i~~ ~~ ~~ VISTA AV ~ ~ r ~ j i ~• ;' . - o ~s z \P ~ ~ ':.~ ~~`~ -Vi$TA FIE1C'HT5 '~ ' ro" ~ ~ : : d CIPAL RO ~'j-~~J~~Sr- ,q`~~~~RN B 4 ~'• : - ~ ~rwtsvwCpCEK ~• ~fN1 VC: t0 Ct - tl` /_•~ `a ,_ $ aVw Clue ~ t" ! . l.F~p~ ~ ..~ ~P ~ / Vrc~u~ r4`at- y. rY~, 1I62~15r ~~ Q •, ~"sA' 9~l•` ! (Oj -/ ; ~ i ltii~ •c~ ~, fv ;;9~ J` , J~PJliat.,.,,._„1~ 4 t r r J 'v ~ _. _ :• •"~ ~ ~i+~ O'f" e~„d\_i'9~ •~ -~C11rwOt.tllvSw~7NGCFw~ '~ 7 6 c r tii~ P~ f5r,rp _ ~~~ ON y~ .n ~ n TaR•MOir~rc ~c TE*~~_ - s~ o', IRLF~,~ d G •., ~Y ' c~ = J ~ ei` _ ~f ',tPp~Ewa L.Qw ! / .r s~o'~ ~1. R~' a~ ~KI~AI 3 / ~c:R o.~.. ;,~w~~~ %~/, Tau l So "~ . rr o ' ,.{~r J• ~ti A.O.. ., ~ ~ I •~"Af1/~t. nc R_ ~ ~Ft i ~. ~ \ .Y/t / - I: `G~ _ say % 1 J ; i } _ 1 I ~ e ~ • ~d ~ ) G I'. -.,,` MAP SHOWING LOCATION OF TWO PROPOSED "'M~~ - ~~ ~ GATEWAY" LOCATIONS ADJACENT TO Fs - ~., BOTETOURT COUNTY LINE _ y`am' t ao • - - - LAKEUwo °o 1) ROUTE 460 Toot2 „~ "u~rfq • •,••> x ~~~ - ~ S 1 4' 2) ALTERNATE 220/ROUTE 604 ~ ~e~ ~~ Rar~boa 'coo, ~ cti~~ For s =~ F• J y~ to p s c Q ! t4KFa+~GE G . ~ ~4~~ ~, I RC f .Rarvsow ~. FO EST .- 6~ . ~ feces \~~ ~ x a ` • M ~ • ,rap L C i ~ e 0 V ~,. C iH Rp T > Z~Ire Cq~ ~ ~"P IAKERIO ~a• ~~ ~~~~i -~ \ ~L ~?pq('`~ 'quo ~~.~ I- , 30v^ l~'yE \"SRtTtSii WOQfR,~,~ • 9 ~ ' ~ S/,~ ~P 2 . f ~''` ~~ '~' / MTh' %~ ~~,~,, ~ °~oti~u c ~ `• • • . / ~ ~ o o .G~~tr+ "Ac"s c .,STEEPLFC?i44~ ~ 't- •• 1 ~ l;rii~~ ~ a. N L •1FS i- F ~ ~ \F P~,cApo ,~ ~ +t+ ~ sr~uuc 6., i F CITY STAN • CEAIETE?T _ I + - t • ! ~~ f E Er J • . -~. 21CC BQT RT + N ~ /L : ENiLE O ~~ ?~ ti. ~Q,~~'~~~ ~ ~i ~"'•. ~~~' • 'rT Oc~ENT/Grti` i~:~tlE ~ ~ "~ pP ~ 1,~Q I Q \ ~ o / C• f'1 .:. ~l~" •.C17MMERCIAL L z C1TY N~Rr$, tlC1AIE ~`~• ~~~~'+ ~~ ~ 402 pQ f1GJ o~ , ~'~ ~ .i. aT P`"~1403 cP ~ S ~G~T ~ Q E~Hr~~ `~ \ • ~ ~ ~ {~ Z . • E RD ••\ ~ 2~ 1401 a0 ,NE85SEa .~ - :.v.*y Wo ~_ _ •- I i ~` 9 ~Z ~,.a 9luE vCGf•0j/,[~\ - fJ;t ''ACC G1 ~U~~S~r _ ~ , -- ~\,- ~ --- ---- -.. THE .. .~ . oR. ~ ~?N~ ~r ... ~ - ~,o ~G KfR L~!'p.E+. ~' ~~ ~ .`,+r~;aMOK££v~ \~ ` Ef~ DC EIDVuf~ '\ ,~d L~~~.RO~' S ~ „~a~t`~~5~ ~~ ~` 6~~ Two coRa ~ ~ to-` a~ ~~ • o"' ' • a" >" o' c+~~ o PJ ° / j \•~ ~ ~ v @~ Je ~P P~. '9 '• a r 1 Glop \\ 1 ~, oG ~9~ - c Q~ ~QV ~ I Ek , , ~• R^ I ~.~} `mac ~~ ~ Q-`~E ~ • n ~\ I S ~ o 0~4 R~R~Tq~ ~ I coto ~ ~ ~ + • •' 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. -f ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 9, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Public Hearing on Roanoke County's Proposed ISTEA Grant Application for Landscape and Streetscape Enhancements for Five Gateway Locations Within Roanoke County, three of which are adjacent to Botetourt County. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS• We are applying for this grant for five projects in one area because it has a greater likelihood of approval. In doing so, we are working with a college, a defined business area, and another locality. We would like to repeat this in other areas of the County if we are successful. BACKGROUND• Roanoke County proposes to submit an ISTEA application to the Virginia Commonwealth Transportation Board requesting grant funding in the amount not to exceed $160,000. The proposed project is the landscape and streetscape enhancement of five locations within North Roanoke County, three of which are adjacent to Botetourt County. These enhancements will create three mutual "Gateways" between Roanoke County and Botetourt County, one of which is located within the Williamson Road (Hollins) Corridor Study area. The other two gateway proposals are also located in the Hollins Corridor Study area, at three specific entrances to the Hollins community. These are located at (1) the intersection of Peters Creek Rd and Williamson Road, and (2) Plantation Road and Williamson Road. The attached maps show the location of the five proposed gateways. FISCAL IMPACT The ISTEA program is an 80 percent matching grant program requiring a minimum of 20 percent local match. Botetourt County has agreed to participate with Roanoke County in the 20 percent local match for the locations adjacent to our common boundary. Both in-kind and cash matching funds are allowed under the grant program guidelines. If Roanoke County is notified that we have been awarded an ISTEA grant for this project, our local share .~=~.~ 2 of the 20 percent requirement will be met by the value of in-kind labor and materials, and funding previously allocated by the Board as implementation funds for the Williamson Road project. Local match requirement. No new funding is requested of the Board for this grant application. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: 1. That the Board adopt the prepared resolution, authorizing the submittal of the proposed ISTEA application to the Virginia Commonwealth Transportation Board. Respectfully Submitted, _.~l..- . Terrance Harr' gton, AICP Director of Pl ning and Zoning Approved, r I-• ~ 'sZ~~ ~ . ~~ W Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Ref erred to Motion by Eddy Harriso Johnson Minnix Nickens Vote No Yes Abs `. / ~ ~ _ i r . _:~S Sty MAP SHOWING LOCATION OF THREE PROPOSED _~ ~r~" "GATEWAYS" IN WILLIAMSON ROAD CORRIDOR ~ ~ , .~ 1) PETERS CREEK ROAD/WILLIAMSON ROAD 6 ~~~~ 2) PLANTATION ROAD/WILLIAMSON ROAD ` I~ 3) WILLIAMSON ROAD AT BOTETOURT COUNTY LINE \ ~. _ 'r i 1,~ i'I/ • y I /i ~ OL ~F/F/ !' '~ Qe ~,/ S~ q ..._ ~ __.. _ 7REA ~ ~C.C~i~ '1C~iS`~cR' ~VF ~. ~~. ANGEL.. p Q~ V / ~ ~ ' ~4G J ~Q \~ . (~ ~ pv ~ 5-r~_i r_:' j 'ter' ~ _ _ __ - ~/ f r ~P~ ~ 1 L~`~/ I ~"SaOLErT~CORP OjJST ;2J0 '~ ~~ Oiyq~r AO,~~~G~aE\ ~/r_e S,. O~ \;OP„{`.~ ~Q~ C~jr.1,f G T7'r Y ~I ~ cH1QN~'''~A\KE`~ ~ (\1/ «A~x~ V.~O -N/~~.?~ , p~ f11 ~ ~ OOi' P -y ~.l c ~ ~,"~. ~ W ~ \ r`A~x O\,p ~/P! S -,.qP .~ ~ pV~ 1R.(!1 . r /.; , ~ ~~ \ C.. ~ 1 \`S1 i~ ~~' \ ~ P~7~y ~a~ v' V \r~crcC_a. r G .Q..~` O,•,pP ENE' SON _ V"~ .; "~' ~ o,-4i ~ 1, 9` ~f~` ~4 NOnNCt '..r v~ \ G:tA CSA Q \' ~`0 ~~/`N ~v~ _\ ~~._ •\ l ~ Z20 I ~G 'J~ y-. \.' ~`~', Cl[ CSC °~~y ~I GEC ~ ,,, ,1~•5 0~ p~~ ,~~'~ ~ savoy C ° 'HO~ T. • ~ D/Q ~ _ ~ .~ l.•a~ ~ o F.yo ,~.-c`Ya GQ ~ ~sDC~9, R 1, cou~~~~ ~ ~~ aE- _r Q- ~. ~ I.T.B ~. gas ~~~~~y N o : ~ F,rr ''~A Ma ~ ~'.~ ~rOtytKS~ ~ .~ ((~~ gk~ ®HA'. MC~ o L ~~4 _ ~• po ~Iry s \N ~ ~ J/ o / tscaYNl~ ~P ~E~~' Bos`~ ~O~ ~/ o vr, .r~~p Lam"` y RO EY70N~ a t / ~`.~ ~ °utp '^-;FO„~ P NClt;.v_Z6~ O~ °* G~'rC~,p 9 ,~:;a-<ER Q.P ~'. ~ f~.E ~R RD < X17. aM•oCJ~r ,~'~ 9 P6C~ESa.tii'e Q NO LE~~E~~ „73.DE~' `P,`~"' _~~p~s~, 51n n r ~~~ 1o¢BRYAN r rr L r5 SUMNR-'" t1~p 9 OMORE ~ C)R b IG-{'($ hC--•.'.'S J f~~~~ d,, oARKpf .HCL+. ,E y,,. Ohs BROOr(1/I t~ GAR~.t4~R 5':TlON U J p. PJ r~ r;..'_ _-. ~ c~~l° . _Ki ~ ZOAAi el`F ~ROfAN uGN y ~` ~,~ ° G~;~ ~o ~ °'s"N%~~X~~ c y~/ _~ ~ ~*~~, E ~~ .~ '~~, 1842 =~ !~ AV~p* ~ ~ K ~ L n. ~y - -° .._. }-~--- f-"- ---~ `, CA-MP~ ---, --~-• ~`hr0p o ao~' p '~y~,r Pra j .~'~"~ `J~ °~\~~90 o SUMMERDEIIN Fq ~,~`'~ q~ Q./ -~ '----- _ ~p,S~ ~ E~S~ ~_YHny ~P .a ~ I ~~0~~ _ ~ ~<v RV ~r,-- _.._ - "~~`____ .•f~r 1 SOP E~ I E~ c' ~ i : a _ _ - oN~.~f~ : rE:i ~~ 00~~' NNY8ft00K ~ c,Q' j ~`` ~ ~ ~ _ j .~ 'ya I4. ~/:. ~N t (Fra. ~,~sr+;a M<.vCR j ~" i i~ 3 °j • I y ~~ G f ~ r~ ~ Q' Toa~~ ' I ~~ ~~ P ~ ~" ~MM R~EI'1SQ : x ~ P[Nf O ! 1280 ? <qk~, ~~ Q \' TON ~ CRESS~~~ ,r f^ r RE v/C ° ~ T REE ~4 J " ~ ~ODIE \O I 1 'y;~'9 -' :•.:e^a.. "WaRO .• ~ r 1 ~ r '4k fElAf r~ ~1 \p ; ~ 'Z 9 Z :=•~E1E.=r T C~ ~ p ~i <vAp~, ~°/ ~ tNOF7TF+~iIUS GAJ'~DEN'S!" ~.~ o ' °~ ~ _..~, ~Q• G~?/ IE~•1.1 NOQ~9 `'S ~,/~ NE C'E`Pi`Nt P~ 115 ~P'~ E' ~ • ^F,~ Zlo 811~ !0 O ' ~ ~ 8EA(j~ ~3 DENT, Q~iS+~En 1~ ~PE1TY ~ P`1 ' \ ~ -:115 ~ ~ I .~ 6L~' RO ~ ~ _ E,N r'tANTq~ ~4 R~~t~ j° 1... 7C:'~'/+S E~~T/ EiO 3 l,,~/~_~i. MOUNTA/N ~ ' 6G1 (2w`- i ~ f~Ndc£ Ve~t1 `7 '~ CLUBHOUSE ~ x~ "~ ~~~.,`~,?c~,~•~~Dw,-~~M11 . ~ 46 w£w i ) O '...-~n"4 \ ~t?u~fSruN SCNO°l~ S"-- ... ~\ ~ ~ ~9 ~ t~10U~idA~N-~' 107° r<'"`~'•~ \~ C, DA.1 ~~e ~f _..: ; BUNKER ~ y ~ `~ sC9 .. ~, ~: '~ ~ TINY TR I Q- ~ r! 1~ ~. -+'• NOER UR• , ,a UR• ZQ S O ~,---lO F. OA 0~ / ~ <P 1 ,~'~ry'~r" r CAPTAII'l'$ ~FtO~/E`:~°a ,y_ ,~ p ~~F~lA-•, rvr •~ RD ~ p Oft ; / ', i ~ S,+ c° / / 1 S ,CHARYW:+CD z AI.MYaR ~ ~,~ .gyp /O \ C' ~,PIr SOMA ~~. ~ it \ 1 ~6?1~D 1O ~ O PPP ~ .~~ ,\~I f ~ ~P~~H o~j ~'~ Z\.' ~4 / i\ ~ ~` Z~/ ~ ' ~~ G •:~~ 1 ,~NSJti' Ol7 616 j' ~ I "r.rCr~.;i~ ~' c~~R"vas~•p ._y _ -_~-%QP~~UN~ALL.E~f + oS%.NtEE:_ao---su~~w~~~:-:-----%'4 ~ L~/~~ W_"w y73~'~A..,~* \~, ~.' a~~lCJ'~FC ;..._~_~ ~ ; ~.OT :~'f~'f~~JElf1 \ p 1, ZI ORLANnO AV ~ORIAM J~ '~ -..~ 'lA. ~ /. ..___..-_ •"l, r.ou:r~$ /v~9E6,c~` ~ ~ ~o yEP~t~7 ~.(_ ' -AN ^ ,__o ' °~ •-- fl---- - '~-._ --r` 90XLEY HILL ___ . ~. ~ [ -- ~ n, ~ - ~P rror .... ~~ ~ - • v ~ /\~ NEB RO UG \\` NOp y ~`; a ~ ,N , ~ ~ ~ `n" BOi oa~p~~ ~~~-',_ _ 9 9'. \~~ o O~LL ~ <p BF~OOR far ~ ror-, ~° ' ~ ~ ! i"~ 6OJ iit~ ~~~ ~~~ - a ` ~~ ~P r ~ 11 .-\~ \ 7D ,VISTA AV ~ ~ ~,~ / 2/j G `. Pan(, Z ~ ~• ~ ~ / ~ .: L7 ~~,,;; `~,~o~ '~, LT' ~Lt :,-+;= `c~ ~tLOwCREEx ~ x~~ aICIfAi. RO ~~.+FS p ERN ...,. it i~~ $ , J ~ ~ Qy snlY CLUB ~^ .p ~Villi •.l; ~ "1' ~~-~ n~P1et` /~ f 'SQ ~' ~ ~~'~~,45% 4_ . `, f 625 ~ C9 ~n~• ~ 6p3 / r i lli3 • [~ ! Y~ ~7 Q ~ ~, b~;' •Pai. 0~~~t'g ~ „• Uj g an R°cctti+sx•r Nc cEN~ g °o,~`"~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ..4~ooy g,~\~ ~t+~ d^ 4`~, ~~~ / ;'.~ " Y'a~ ``,may ~ t ~ ~r D ~N 1 ~ . . 06 r°wwE sou~~• tc+~ - y':;so~o . ~RLF~,r ~ G Y ::!_ = t ::ec r~ ~,,, - . -o ; >AaPtic•~o ~ ~ LOw NO--iNG E , ' \ J!°~ c~~~.~,,. s~ ~KI~AL' ~ ~' / ~,y '. ors - .. .t,,, /~ ~tr~~ 1 !a r'~ l ~ ti ~ ~ !,~ ~ ' .~l-~•P 1~ ~' 'Ark. _ ~1~~ ~,Ryy~~ ~AElr+~t~ r.r.i~_ ~ yf.: r ' 1 •~ ~ i ~ ~7~ ~ I~ ~ ' \ --_,, i MAP SHOWING LOCATION OF TWO PROPOSED `~~t,,~ ~~ "GATEWAY" LOCATIONS ADJACENT TO ~ _FS .>~,~~• BOTETOURT COUNTY LINE . a~ LAKELaaO ~ TOQ12 x,~ HV 3 ` 1) ROUTE 460 - ~ NTf°s aP ~:~; ./ 2) ALTERNATE 220/ROUTE 604 ~ ~ ` SCHOO ~ F+~,~ Fo~S ~% ~~ J ~~ CA Cj • -. Q ~ C4~Ea~OG= CigC . / ~/ ~ r~ E ,_ .Ratveow ~: ~ - Fo e~ . •~ 18C A ~~ I • ~ 't L C REQ. ~~~'7~(~eS, ~ ~ ~p a! e-q~`S. <' ~ ~sH Ra ' ; r~Ya .~ °5y,,;R ~ ~P LAKERIO LYQ 1 IJf7 w0~. „ • ,P •' 'YI ,•, ~ .wG [ENE. c" 'L A `~ S/~~T~ OCO Z ,r~ j ~ p •C f~+~~ ~p~,~ c .~STE~PLEZI-I45~ ~ '' 't- . ~ ~ I ,,'~~'~ ' c? ~ n,, M/ ~..2:A I • ~~ .1260 ¢ ~ C~^~c~ ~cnao ~ ~f ~// ~a'L i + STE~ + I ~ CiTY t ~ STS ~ • CE~/ETERY + + l ~p + ~ \ ~~ ~ 8F TIEY +t21vG ~T ~ _t1 ~ j .`P~ ~ _0 ~ ~JG:'E4'iLr O V~ ~+~ / Y Op Z ! E a ~. J P'`'ip. QQQ- (lam ~ ~J• a // \ ~ ., 1pS ~ Q i '• ~~'~~Qh cfPA.R CIAL ~L Z .~CGtiI,•'~ 4y 7" o ~~C• C1 = ~ •.~MMEr? ~ ~ ~- C17Y NU?.S~'.w t~CauE _ % O SZ~ • i C '. PARK ~ i~ ' j-~ W J •~ ~~`/ ~ ~ ~` ~' ~' 402 I pfJ I;G7 o ~ ~Q~~~/J~ ~~ 4' ~'' ,~gt403 P ,., o t ~ ~~ • \ ` AT.~ `.• '~~ 220 ta0t 0vo WE85.Ea .. _\ .. I ~..2 etuE RlccE~ f \ 1 ~ ~o^ UPRa.+r .117E N -~ ~Qy = h t 1 THE KDS DR. ~ ~ ~f ~ f +~ . ~~//``~~ r ttN' 1' ° 6D$ rwE£~JS.~'oc~EIDP~+Er+T ~, /~y~cT G~~~.RO~'F, r~'~ ~~ Q~fS`• ~ g~; O;` f ~coav ~ ('fly O ~~\ \~` ~(~, E P 0~4.. I .'-- r SD O •` Q ~ ~ \ ~~ P`~ o~K., ~,~ ~ ~+~ o P~ off; ~, ., 1 _o~ ~ ~ ~ ~~BONSACK ' ~ ~,~ R~R~T 3G ~ Coto ~ I ~ + 1y ! 5 G J /1 r /, ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 9, 1996 RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE COMMONWEALTH TRANSPORTATION BOARD TO ESTABLISH A PROJECT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF THE LANDSCAPE AND STREETSCAPE ENHANCEMENT OF FIVE LOCATIONS WHEREAS, in accordance with Commonwealth Transportation Board construction allocation procedures, it is necessary that a request by resolution be received from the local government or state agency in order that the Virginia Department of Transportation program an enhancement project in the County of Roanoke, Virginia, and WHEREAS, a public hearing was duly advertised and held on January 9, 1996 to elicit citizen comment on this project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia requests the Commonwealth Transportation Board to establish a project for the improvement of the Landscape and Streetscape Enhancement of five locations within Roanoke County, three of which are adjacent to Botetourt County. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors hereby agrees to pay 20 percent of the total cost of planning and design, right of way, and construction of this project, and that, if the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors subsequently elects to cancel this project, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors hereby agrees to reimburse the Virginia Department of Transportation for the total amount of the costs expended by the Department through the date the Department is notified of such cancellation. ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~J -' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 9, 1996 AGENDA ITEM• Request to vacate a 50 foot unimproved right-of-way referred to as Granville Street which is located between the intersections of Northway Drive (Route 1820) and Chester Drive (Route 1857) for approximately 400 feet in length, as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 20, and located in the Hollins Magisterial District. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS ~Z~,ystiy a~~~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Staff is recommending that the unimproved right-of-way be vacated on the condition that a P.U.E. is retained along the same boundaries as located within the vacated area. BACKGROUND The petitioner, Stanley Birckhead is the owner of four parcels adjacent to Granville Street (unimproved), which parcels are more particularly described as Lots 2, 3, 4, and 5, Block 11, of North Hills. Rudy Cox is agent for Stanley Birckhead. The petitioner's desire to vacate Granville Street (unimproved) which is 50 feet in width and approximately 400 feet in length shown on the attached map and recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 20. The petitioner's purpose for requesting the vacation is so that he may re-subdivide his lots into 3 lots with street frontage on Chester Drive. The vacation of the right-of-way provides the petitioner the necessary road frontage to create the third lot thus improving the marketability of his property. SiTNIlKARY OF INFORMATION S ~ County staff has received no objections but because there are public utilities presently located within the right-of-way (Appalachian Power, City of Roanoke and C & P Telephone), it is recommended that the entire right-of-way be kept as a public utility easement. Therefore, Roanoke County is requesting that the described right-of-way be vacated in accordance with Chapter 11, Title 15.1-482(b), Code of Virginia 1950, as amended, by the adoption of the attached ordinance. First reading of the proposed ordinance is scheduled to be held on January 9, 1996; a public hearing and second reading is scheduled for January 23, 1996. STAFF RECOMMENDATION County staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the first reading of the ordinance to vacate the referenced right-of-way and instruct the County Attorney in preparation of the ordinance to insert the following conditions: a) Owner subdivides and records the necessary documents per Roanoke County requirements. b) The entire right-of-way be retained as a public utility easement. ITTED BY: APPROVED BY: v ,~ S~ ~~~ Arnold Covey, Directo Elmer C. Hod e g of Engineering & Insp ctions ----- County-Administrator --------------------- ----- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Motion by: No Yes Abs Eddy Harrison Johnson Minnix Nickens pc: Paul Mahoney, County Attorney ~i NORTH ` -_~ 20 29'00" E • --~ CHESTER DR. S 21'02'00" E 137.30' ~~ LOT 5 ~~ ~ LOT 11 TAX MAP N0. ~ TAX MAP NO 27.14-3-7 ~ ~ ( J 27.14-6- ; 00 ~ ~ 50' RIGHT-OF-WAY TO BE VACATED (0.45 AC.) LOT 4 O_ ~ }~ ~- TO BE RETAINED AS A P . U . E . . ~ I TAX MAP N0. _ 27.14-3-8 ~ ~ ~ N 20'29'00" W 06~_ LOT 3 00~ LOT 10 TAX MAP N0. ~ ~ TAX MAP N0. ~ 27.14-3-9 ~p ~~ 27.14-6-1 O 00+ O ~c9_ O., LOT 2 TAX MAP N0. 27.14-3-10 p . F- °o_ ~~~ 6 N 20'29'00° W 5 L071 NORTH WAY DR. TAX MAP N0. 27.14-3-11 / \ / ~// /~\ \ / O ~ \ \ .\ ~ \ ~ S ~ 5~° \ \~ ROANOKE COUNTY ~0 FOOT UNIMPROVED RIGHT-OF-WAY REFERRED TO AS ENGINEERING & GRANVILLE STREET RECORDED PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 20, HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT. INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT Si AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 9, 1996 ORDINANCE VACATING AND CLOSING A SECTION OF 50 FOOT UNIMPROVED RIGHT-OF-WAY REFERRED TO AS GRANVILLE STREET LOCATED BETWEEN THE INTERSECTIONS OF NORTHWAY DRIVE (ROUTE 1820) AND CHESTER DRIVE (ROUTE 1857) FOR APPROXIMATELY 400 FEET IN LENGTH, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 20, AND LOCATED IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Stanley Birckhead, the petitioner, is the owner of Lots 2, 3, 4, and 5, Block 11, Map of North Hills, as shown on that certain plat of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Plat Book 4, Page 63; and, WHEREAS, said lots are adjacent to an unimproved section of Granville Street between Northway Drive and Chester Drive as shown on said plat; and; WHEREAS, the petitioner has requested that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, vacate and close the section of unimproved right-of-way referred to as Granville Street located between the intersections of Northway Drive (Route 1820) and Chester Drive (Route 1856) , measuring fifty feet (50' ) in width and approximately four hundred feet (400') in length, said right of way having been created and shown on the Map of North Hills recorded as aforesaid in Plat Book 3, Page 20; and, WHEREAS, Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by Section 15.1-431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and a first reading of _1f.- ~I ~.~ this ordinance was held on January 9, 1996; and the public hearing and second reading of this ordinance was held on January 23, 1996. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That an unimproved section of right-of-way, situate in the Hollins Magisterial District and referred to as Granville Street, being 50 feet in width and extending approximately 400 feet in length, located between the intersections of Northway Drive (Route 1820) and Chester Drive (Route 1856) for approximately 400 feet in length, as shown on the Map of North Hills recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 3, Page 20, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, subject to the following conditions: a. That all costs and expenses associated herewith, including but not limited to, publication costs, survey costs and recordation of documents, shall be the responsibility of the petitioner; and, b. That the entire area of the 50-foot right-of-way, extending approximately 400 feet in length from Chester Drive to Northway Drive, is hereby reserved and retained as a public utility easement, together with the right to provide maintenance to any existing public utility facilities located within the vacated area, and together with the right of ingress and egress thereto from a public road; and, c. That the vacated area of land shall be added and combined, by deed or by plat, to the adjoining properties as provided by law and petitioner shall comply with the Roanoke County Subdivision Ordinance, the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, and other applicable laws, regulations and requirements, including recordation of the necessary documents, in connection with this vacation or any subsequent subdivision of the property. 2 S ~ 2. That the Department of Engineering and Inspections shall record a certified copy of this ordinance with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, and the recordation costs shall be payable by the petitioners. 3. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. 3 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ...~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 9, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AIITHORIZING THE ACQIIISITION OF CERTAIN INTERESTB IN REAL ESTATE FOR A WELL LOT IN BROORWOOD SIIBDIVISION COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: This ordinance reflects further staff negotiations to resolve the dispute with respect to an existing well lot located off of Woodbrook Drive in the Brookwood Subdivision, in order to complete the clearance requirements for a public water source. This matter has previously been on the Board's agenda on December 12, 1995, and January 10, 1995. Roanoke County owns a well lot, identified on the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map #86.03-3-16, which is located in Brookwood Subdivision and is shown on the "Map of Brookwood," recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County in Plat Book 7, page 77, a partial copy of which is attached hereto and marked Exhibit A. That portion of the well lot lying outside the boundaries of the subdivision was never conveyed to the County, even though there is a reference in the title records to an easement having been granted to the County for this section of land. Part of this section of the well lot is now owned by Michael H. Frank and the remainder of the section is owned by Marie S. Harrison. This section of the well lot is necessary to comply with the minimum size and area requirements established by the State Board of Health for operation of wells, to provide clearance from any contamination source on all sides of the public water source. The Utility Department anticipates that the Brookwood well will be necessary for at least another three months, but will be abandoned when the water transmission lines are operational. Upon discovery that the County had not acquired legal title to the subject property, staff negotiated with the owners for acquisition. The owners and staff requested Board approval of an agreement to authorize leasing the required areas for such period 1 of time as it is needed for operation of the well in exchange for conveyance of the Board's well lot property to Marie s. Harrison to be combined with her existing property upon abandonment of the well and declaration of the well lot as surplus property. On January 10, 1995, the Board declined to adopt the proposed ordinance and directed staff to negotiate further with the property owners and/or initiate procedures for condemnation. On December 12, 1995, the Board adopted a resolution authorizing the commencement of eminent domain proceedings for the acquisition of and immediate right-of-entry to a 123 square foot parcel owned by Michael H. Frank and to a 1,512 square foot parcel of land owned by Marie S. Harrison to establish the requisite clearance for a public water source. Ms. Harrison and Mr. Frank have indicated their intention to use their property for their existing, legitimate horticultural purposes. The use of this property for these purposes is in conflict with the requirements of the State Board of Health for a public water source. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: After the conclusion of the public hearing on December 12, 1995, and the adoption of the resolution authorizing eminent domain proceedings for the acquisition of and immediate right-of-entry to this property, staff continued to hold discussions with Mr. Frank and Ms. Harrison in an attempt to negotiate a mutually-agreeable solution to this problem. Mr. Frank and Ms. Harrison have agreed to delay using their property in a manner which would place the County out of compliance with State Department of Health requirements, pending the satisfactory resolution of this problem. These negotiations have resulted in a possible settlement. Since Ms. Harrison and Mr. Frank are interested in acquiring this well once it is declared surplus by the County upon the North Loop Water Transmission Line becoming operational, the preferred solution is to grant Ms. Harrison and Mr. Frank a "credit" in the amount of $3,000 to be used for their offer to the County to purchase the Brookwood Well. In the event that their offer is not the highest and best offer for this well lot, then the County would pay Ms. Harrison $1,360 and Mr. Frank $110 to compensate them for the County's use of their property for a public water source for the past twenty years. In exchange for these considerations, Ms. Harrison and Mr. Frank would agree to allow the County to continue to use their property for a public water source until the North Loop Water Transmission Line is operational and this well lot is declared surplus. As an alternative solution to this problem, staff has negotiated a lump sum payment of $2,100 to Ms. Harrison and $400 to Mr. Frank to acquire the required portions of their land. If this 2 Sa alternative were chosen, the County would incur additional costs for the preparation of surveys, deeds, and recordation expenses. FISCAL IMPACTS' Under the preferred alternative no further costs would be incurred, assuming the credit for the offer to acquire the Brookwood Well Lot is the highest and best offer. If this credit is insufficient to acquire this well lot once it is declared surplus, the fiscal impact would be the payment of $1,470 as compensation for the use of this property. If the second alternative were chosen by the Board, then the County would incur additional costs including the payment of the consideration ($2,500), surveys, deed preparation, and recordation fees. Staff recommends that the Board adopt at first reading the attached ordinance. Paragraph 2 of this proposed ordinance requires the insertion of one of follwoing alternatives: Alternative 1. • That the consideration for the acquisition of these interests in real estate shall be as follows: the Board of Supervisors shall grant to Michael H. Frank and Marie S. Harrison a credit in the amount of $3,000 to be used for an offer from Michael H. Frank and Marie S. Harrison for the purchase of the Brookwood Well Lot when said well lot is declared surplus and made available for public sale; and • In the event the offer submitted by Michael H. Frank and Marie S. Harrison for said well lot is not the highest and best offer, then the Board of Supervisors agrees to pay the sum of $110 to Michael H. Frank and the sum of $1,360 to Marie S. Harrison to compensate them for the County's use of their real estate as a public water source. • In exchange for this consideration, Michael H. Frank and Marie S. Harrison grant to the County the right to use the required additional sections of land for public water source purposes until the North Loop Water Transmission Line is operational and the Brookwood Well Lot is declared surplus. 3 ~` Alternative 2. That the consideration for the acquisition of these interests in real estate shall be as follows: • $400 to be paid to Michael H. Frank; and • $2,100 to be paid to Marie S. Harrison. Staff recommends that the Board adopt the proposed ordinance with the preferred alternative, Alternative 1. fully submitted, h~~ ~ Paul M Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by agenda.realest.brookwoo. rpt Vote No Yes Abs Eddy Harrison Johnson Minnix Nickens 4 ~~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 9, 1996 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN INTEREBT IN REAL ESTATE FOR A WELL LOT IN BROORWOOD SUBDIVIBION WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, is the owner of a well lot (Tax Map No. 86.03-3-16) located off Woodbrook Drive, between Lots 12 and 13 in the Brookwood Subdivision, said lot having been acquired by deed dated October 12, 1976, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 1055, page 232, and being shown upon the "Map of Brookwood" recorded as aforesaid in Plat Book 7, page 77; and WHEREAS, an additional section of land is necessary to comply with the fifty-foot radius requirements of the State Board of Health for a public water source; and WHEREAS, the section of land to be acquired from Michael H. Frank is a portion of Tax Map No. 86.03-4-12, being a small triangular parcel consisting of 123 square feet, and the second section of land to be acquired from Marie S. Harrison is a portion of Tax Map No. 86.03-4-14 and consists of 1,512 square feet; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning this acquisition and conveyance of real estate was held on January 9, 1996, and a second reading was held on January 23, 1996. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of .J °~ Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the acquisition and acceptance of the required section of property, to comply with the fifty-foot radius requirement for the well lot (Tax Map No. 86.03-3-16) located off Woodbrook Drive in the Brookwood Subdivision, from Michael H. Frank and Marie S. Harrison, is hereby authorized. 2. [INSERT ALTERNATIVE 1 OR ALTERNATIVE 2] 3. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish this transaction, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 4. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. Agenda.realest.brookwood. rso 2 N . ~ w 2 y a ~. a ~ i a w w f1 W c a . a Q O I I~ 1 ~ S+•)! a ~ j ~ w 2 1 $y t2j ~ 1 ~ y ~ ~ 0• M 1 Z ~ _ , a~ ,, 4 ~ 1 i o - o ~ ~ ~ .1_.re A ~ 1, O ~ph~ u C ~ N\ a\ O IO' a a g 1 ~ w <./; A I q~ ~ g a 11 2 1 , a 1 \ ~ ~ ~ 1 s ' .. a y \ a 1 ` \~. ~ ti ~ ~ 2 ~~~y Inc " ~\ .. M OQ~~ ~~^p~Y4~ ~a ` agioti~q^$ a ~ ~~ac2ia`~°o ~~' p2;ny a ~~tiac,~,~aga ~ ,, '~ aka ,~' a >C~~vo~ 1 ~ ~~q .; ~ 3a .a Oloq~'F' .~, \ ` 2 , n o o v° '~ ` a b v v {\ e. ~ v h~ O Y A J {~ ~1 w V h~ ` Y 4 ~~ y1 i1 ~~~ 0 Y O V C~ 01 w y h 0 N .j M Y M` N a" Y 2 2 x 2 2 2 2 2 2 ~ 's~~S^ ;h~~~y~~~ V k~L~ a Q ~ r~;q,~afi~R~R~/isgsh~~ i 2 " 0888o8g ~8 88c8 8~ ~~?c ° a , , , , A ^~` ~~ ~ ~~ ~ il In 4~2t ~Z~~~ ~~` ~~~oa4,h„uww~i.4wou4 0 w\ W 1 p 0 In h V{~ 4 O W w h N V C 4 V h y`~ O O w 0 0" i, w$ h V 0 V ~ ° j ~ o pW v A ~ C N ~~wi }~ ~ }Y w n 2 ~ y y V N w o o `~ c~ w n s° y n r ~ ~ a b `a ~ a ~ " 1~ u ~ p o w ~° a a a . ~ a y i O ~ W \ a P ~ 11~ II1 h `O 4 n v is ~ a o u v 4 4 M~ h u~~. Y1 0 ~ 4ss~~ r ~as~sss; 1 v ~ 1 ~ ' r Ij 1 4 1 ~ y .JOG>>•~• o 11 'AID 1 4 0'~ /r ~f~JJ ^ ~. 1 N ~ i o A 1 1 ~ ~~. ^~~Zoo°o,l\\~,ggw,ooo~oa ~ " Q~ w V Q' N ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ 4 P V ~ v B O ~ ^p~ yy po y p O v N O c O P~ H ~! w r N ~ v 0 4 w p O ~ M1 Q y V P v ~ ^ 8°8888$ '~ 0 888ogo8o8~~°g8 '' O~ O~ h~ g w 4 q p o p V 1 o N M o l`i ~ C ~ q w ~ h P Y' m q 0 u V w N R\ N R ?. J A w N~ y~ $ 2 p o U u ~' u V y u } Oi 0~ 4 ,AN M N4hi a N~ ~ O ~ a p p p p p, p O r N P O$ O O A A p w O 6 p O~$ 0 0 0 o n .pj V w l°~ O ~ O~ p~ P p fw` u N °: u M d m 4 j,, p, In O H O ~i e' R O h 1+ V V h N V 01 V O N Y O~ ~ 2 ~ O O: O u 2 a 4 4 ~ a 4 Q ~ t . 1 ,. " 4 ~` p o t .. r r~,, O 4" 4 ` N ; R r o 4 ~ ~: I: u d :: a p p ~m"8wbu~`400 4P4W 8 ~ ~ M1 ~ ! 4 888$°0 8 $8~~, Hg`~,8 $°° 8$888 q a , , , , °I11~y~~~~~~ ~~ ~•~ ^i~'1~^~~Z 0 I+ 8 m a ` ^ 4 v v u ~nc. c SnhO,o ` ul°. o'".$~ iOio ~ p ~o , (~~ po ( o, p N 4 0 .w o P" w h P a O v to N p 1 4 h h y ~ ~ ?: YS tls.cr~~iv 1 1 ~ ~ i'a_. J~~.w^ ° ~ h ~ N ~c,~ttiti~aa•eeZ22i^nl. a ootin°yy°~.yRV P~Nw~ylrho~ $ u~°V~a£goy ~h~~~~`~2$^ a 8ooS8$8$o8g88o8888. A w u a g ; N N• u y p Cp fn O V o w y V 0~ p ~ Pi y°. I°iPcF~oop MM"aH4u•Pi C • 0 0~ 0~ 4$ C~~ P N N h V O S$ M y yyyy r~{~ ~ M O N N V V O W O 1 O m 4 r a h p g„o oo~NU`OI° vn~g °sgon Am ` O O 2 4 4 4 2 2 ~ ='4 a 2 u"; Z~ N 4 St. ~O.C ° 4 ~0~r. N~~~S~vuv D i ~ ~ n2~°,g :'h. ~ia° u ~ ~ av~u ~ ~ a a n { , •p O pp ~ ' pp Q N 0 0 6 6 8 0$~ g i ~ $$ O O D. O p ~ { AA~Z~AA 4~ AM^i^i^.A~ O ~j r~ a ~~ . . 4VOi~0y~y~w~Orh~V .~WIgV o u 1p Y$ N A A C V O° O h A w w N 4 O` y w O 7 ti ~• aY~l<^ ,~,. `awl ~` ~ .{ -~+ ji,~~~` ° = a k - 4 Oa q ."yi .2 y 2 ti ^ ~ ~I 1 )Irk •'1 ~ ~~,. 1 ~ ^ ~O ° ° a ^ L ~ as `, v~^~,~ ~ ~ a ~ ~a,HV2 7 ~ 11 i •\~ ~ie~i~ ~ ? ~e ^ y ~ o `~ O a ti 2 III ~ & ~~~` ~+'~• ts'sraiP ro ec ~ ti 3 ~ ~ q v q - , ~P' 06D/GNl1f0 FOR .NVY. R/>r ~ ~ 4 ti 2 ~ II O: ~ ~ ~ ~ y n : ~ a q~v • 11 ~ ~ ~ ~, l~ O `1 \~'I ay0u,o a u~ a 4oaaaw0aC4ui ; t,-a. a~~~~v aaOi~~R ~x ~~'n~•°co„f i~ ~ °t ~iac wa a2~EniT1. ~v nn2ii a~~ hyly 2^y 2 as 1 OOq 2 R"1 ~`Ipa 4 A O Ou <'.`I 022~Y4 ~ \"a 220 a ~ ~a~qg O t ~ . 2 a aa`q~. to '~'1 ' ~ t,~ou qa^'~ "m~v~ a °pe;ygti `13 ao~c q q23 ~ o o E: o tipy^^ 2.a ; °~ '^ ' ~~z ~ y~~ag0 2~~~~~~~~~'~~aa~a~oa~c x ~ v;iamoN o2m4=^~-2cvr~,a,.^\~°c•2~ti~o '~'~ ~ taA .. o"'~op c•x o a 2 ~'~ nil ^lua^``~ ~^ c2 a^2 a xn 20^ ~3a ^a~c ,. . ~~~•-. As \ ~ 4 yy 0 2" a, _~ q a 0 n g n o ~ a Y o i y a 3 n 0 ^I * ^ ^~ n ~ t o '~ ^ a t n a q ~ 1~~" O'1 ~ 7C~` OID~ O a^` 2 44 °~ t2 "I yh~Rlwr °q^O~Ig4R00 .~~ ^ ^ C 44va 1 Nea ~ N~~oao~l\ ~aq;..~=o3ez 2a~ yo.,o4'~3gv- o •a+,~c a4 a2~ ~^ c~ ~ 0~3~ y' to 2 y~2 c ~2:^02 : oa ^t2 O ^IaZC m~ ^2^ ^aC :~ c 4~i~n4<~a4q~o^Oi~yAy°y~4^'°"^~.c"~ `SI"42 go3c°~a"IOA~=~Ia''~?c~''^°,°~~°~aZ~na,a~~ ~ t " ~' t an aOs ^ 4 oa4oq. 2 a42 • ~O ,:. D, a ^yq o22 °aRea\M i o2^v. ^lyg~2' a o°a~~ 3°g~1~ ~o"i ~ ~ a 2' a ~~:•~ ~ 2 a4 O~j$ a ZrAOn Oo V a0a ~aq'~pI\° ~A\ aZyq'lana °27aAg~^°C^Ilna^^~ ya•4a t ,0da ~ ~ Q' 0 2 y 3 O L N `I ¢ g q a N~ a s >; ° ~. x a ~ 2 y ~ a^ n y ^~ x 2 " ~^~ $ Z o ~~ cc p ~ a N = 3+. o ^^ 2 a^o ~1 p1Y ~ ~ y\Oay a<vahn au~ ~ rs^qt^~ oa ul c21 °~"°iq0 y`^" q aq AN q°~ C ^ A\ p14~ R~ ~ mNZ^~ ~c°33agOnag'~ ~2i2: ~i °A 1100 U~OO 4"'aa ~2^°"p m^am N~ n 0.~0 ~ a p I.Zyo;:a'+v aaga oao " o o~ n o °1 2~ o ti °' o 0 - ~ ~p 3~~~ qn u ao ~aF °aon~i •,~iaz~~aaryo~eyaa- a=Oar,' ~ e` ^ a` ~ qq °"1a0 2~ ~~ ^t ~ti2 o2Z a0 "~ 'y yq a2A° ^~ g~en~2a Mn~O2M~`"a"O ~Ati~~ • a ZNca<o~°aa aau~gSRvo~q°ya a"Ooaoq aao a4u~19 q ~c~x ~~v <4A4 4ax4 ~ q~ t ~ uMt o4 0°^~; av o~3 y~< aa22A~a' y~av,a °'~N~am.'~~v~"1$i ^aa \ A 4 y M ~ 0 ~~ a 2 2. ° t a v< y o A 4 a q v ti R O ~<aa<~~oai~,~ v.aC °~~ v :°~q q2 y3aa~z a ~A~v2N~\~ao2~ 2O^'~~ • Z q a 2- n 4 ,, o xaa~ ~ ^ ui 0 02 no a a. ti 2 ^ o a . 2 2 q a [ a" r : < < ~ o a q 2 a ... x o • y Z vv tao' c°a~2- oa$ga a„~,a, ~o~g~~a8 aka oo, oG2q<$'ata~a ti~a o 4 A3Z .:• •W ~ . aa`ala~ <q•cp iy • gyro" w^ ~a <o ~a^`law e e m a o. `12tm a° a GFna2~n~12t"Naa~~a aoaOa eoaO'~trl<a\ ~^~= Nye-:coa`,~laao',a32^°~aa°' ~aa$O 01~ ,,`Iq Z. ~ o q 4 ~ ~ ~~ e~' a q^~~1 y~o a o nq a 4 02 2^, .. ,. O ~0~ nz0~°nucZ2~ao~oop ~~°o,uai2o Aa$o3 Oq`Oq aao^^ityayay• eQlan\<oo ~\^ C a 0 ~ ~` t .~a n~\q w as ~ :aoa2 cyc a3Q ^ Nqo^2^ ;^ ° ~ F v 2 va o ~yaa ao cl a ~[ .~`. v, ti~~ aioai~aoan v.v a N'I~ ~~ w ^li<°n a'12ay goavti ^o 00 ~~ a '1~nanuq•'1 ^~2v2 4 ^'~ ° '° ° 2w q3 ^,e^I~ °oq ~a°q•' aa~24o°yk"~i a`I 2~ n1 ua ^ ty ^~q ha2~ ^~ a oa,3 ^N e c o mtie 4 ^I ~ ~ . a ^o ~ to clncaAq~a^ aao i o ~ no 4 atn O ~ .~ ua \o°oa a ° ~~q°` otigea t2^ct~,aa3 A a^. ., v: ~ a~`^ $qq c1~2~~a.aa~o ~ ,,~., 2 a,,t2 Ou<y~ p2y~3 a;0 a aaa oN Oa<N~Z•in y~oot,1~~1 ~ e ~i~a °.~,^a aL~o ~ °' agZx q~x vaoa<^y ga~2a ~aul•.o.a a~ •~~ ~• o" 2 a~2 vq cl ~ 4a~, 2 2 0 o e>• `~ ~ ~~aoaap qv~~i; ~I.q,^ NN°y2" ~o^"'°~~„~~ a~ i ~~2q y4ecyvo ocqu boa ~a$n ~,~ ~~O ~ 4 ~~~y4~~.0 °aa 4on^ o ^ua yay~ ~t 2~m o`~q a~~o~ y~2 A ~n~i~ `I a ~ ~ a \ ;~ 2t~a ~ o a $a = ~~ `q42~`~ ^~ 4 OAO ~m°a ac n2e^ O • - ) ~1 ~ ~°~2Z4~ Ila Ida ~i o' "i 2 X0"1 y"~2 o ti "1 2 y^22°i2a~n2 02 a O ~ ~ ~ qa ~ato~7<n" GVe o\a$;O ~ 22 ~ 4`ma y' a O 1 ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ay~ O a n pza O 2tin t~O a a`tav2^,q"~ i4~112 ct DA{ ~0\~^Ing2 y ~21°N \~C ~~ • a°~^ 0 4°,0$a aoe° ~~ °'• a Ow ZaS t2 ° ~ ocia. a~ A "^ c ~ o~ A \ 1 n 11'100 ~ . au A°`<q a 2e`,~,aeuli~a ~ O' 2 A ~~ Z o ~ 4`t ; a2a 4 0 2 ~8aa~q o N ~ ~ $020 ^oq` °` t~_ ~ ~ '~ a " ~' `^ 3"g22n ~ as ~ : a 2a,~' 2u aa.,y,~2 0 0no7 ^ 4'1 ^yn~ 4 ZA $ ~ ~' n" ~ '1~ eaaa n° c aao ZA tot '~ ~~ ~ y •~A~• : 2a2t~ ^oaO ;°oq a,°~y.a~<2&ay T o q 2 g n A q ^ O~~ ° ~ °2 50~2''~ q\ ~ne2 ~ ~4<s.l 3atie<^$°i^o~~°Ae ~'O ana o c°y aao~y a \ c~ O0 u ~~W y2ti~y~ oy°2~a aqa+, ~ v 'I~e oti2^,a< `I qy?, 2c~4ya\ "~ a a.l 2 ~~r~ 11 a ~ ~ p N A ~ 2c of a a•l 2 a y~ ~ oCti •n ati a ~0 ~~° ~ ev~^I 2 ^a P^ Q<ga~,naa-~~<~2 02 ^^2~Caoa~on^ ^x2 O nlnl O a ~2C•Z < o ~ O ~ ~~ q a4a ~~ ^ ` '~eaZ 4 as Ay ao~ ' y~~ a ~u'`,a4 $aa n2" oat ~ .~~$ ~^$ oa as ~aZ2 q at^ a ~•a\O ~ ,...v ~ y o ~ a a •,"~ ~^ a i a~^i ~I'~e ° ~ '~v o~ a ^. ~e ~ ~ ~ a n 1~\~e°~32go ~v 'a'+ ~qN`v o ~ ~~~'" ~ a° ~~^~ ^ ao2,~i~ i yi v a^.i, a$~~$"F geq~a ~q a"Oaaaczi"q'~3u~ tia~y t Z a t4~ O a c1 v y q x~ 9. o o L" • e o.~" +. • ~) ~ ~~ ~ ,. <' - `~ yn:1C ~ a~~ y ~tl~~i ~A ^ c ~2 a eeA n~ q`I~a °+j~ 2a~g2n,\yOS ~I Oyto '=V ~ZOn NZOta "1 a yo ° ~ q+l A ^• '4; to a ^2 O a3 w~IN 2 O y." 2 ~ 2 n0[aa~ q'n~ •" a^ a s^~ 2C L 4 ~~ ~~a a a m ap 0 qC e y aw,~ O q y a a ZN n^ °" y y zA A i 1. ~•. ~ a .. ~ °0 Oc ~q aqua ~~ a ryCi2 M~ <`,gM a~ `2i$~cy2 Y~A=n X22 Z ~ a '12?2guo^,~ Z ~ ao 1~$ x ^,o m' a A a y q^ v ^a a~ ~~cpti~ a~ v, 4. ^I n < ''~: ~ .. ~ ~ ~ ,: a 2 ~ q ;! a ~~ e 3 ; ~~ C a a o 8 q °' ~ 2 m c e ;~ e a y ~ na, u a a~ ~ ~ ~~~ 1~n 4a• °I ~ ~ g q Z~ AF .< n^ ~u C 2i. as ^ q ;. ? i ~' ~ < _. ~ q i ~ a ~ ~ ~ a u ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ v ~ .. c ~ ~ ~ z 1 ~ c ~ ~ ..~ ~ i .. ~ ~ ~ ox, a o , i ~ a a ~ ~ ..- ~ a p~ ., }. a_ q a Z, e w t ~~ L a .~ t. o,., Z ~ :'.r`».. .•.'~'"lY~'..~i1~~C.7Tt;.ti ..wZ .-.~1et•~.~ `t :iii_.1°rx ,w3tr~ ~.X •.~ .~ 5S~"/>d 70 ~i n .53,:~ _ltte: a. f4KV`Lt~'::}~.::S+.s.J •..._::~:... o4.r.~:i~_~. _~ !_:,.c.T^Yslsd.'r`...:a.a.~.~a..~.,.,......lai~.;. ` V ~O~ s ~~' ~~ ?..F ~.i r x~~~.,+E/,~ . ~ w _ .- ~'~hT;MVr0~7:_k:j3 '4aa??~y6'YCT ~Y:?a'~~ e ~~ ^. v 2 w v o t t>;! b i 2 °° k>° a° 2 2 v b ~~ ^~ ~~^. t,a ~~~ao w 2 b a' U y Q? tJ N N t V y ~~~;~~~: w~° 2 w ~ b w:~,ay ~~w°~v '~;59en-r.,- C'~ ~.t~'r~'•. ` Q ?~!> " ~-,'~`~~ .Z'kF~, 1'~'ru'a~~i~Trv ~v,~,; ,w $a2k~ti ~b w 2e ~` ~ .' ~~4a i a~~8~vioJrt ri Q~~~~~i:'Q~wW 2$i~Q w~~~oW €~~y;~~`a~gge e~~~j~ _ ~ o w i o ~- v w i 4¢ n a ` ~ v~ o! v 8 3 ~ g e 2 Q 8~° v ~° w~ e V u v ¢ ti°~~ t u O a 2 ~ ~ Q V $~ m `l ~. ~ Q ~. 2 ~ n Q 2¢° e ti ~^^~ 3 ~° Q u a y i° Z` a~ y~ ~ i o°~ t o o° 2 2~ e Q h Q~ ¢ °8~ a iW z $ o e ~~ ° g$ o °~ bu 2 c ¢ y sn o -~ ~ °pt ~~¢¢W3°.ZZi~g iQ °oow$t 8¢28$ ~:y"~8 ~•`,i~•aQ ~ ~Qe~&~~vr>n y~° '~~ Q v~~~~ ~' 2 2 v u > o W 2 0 2 o a o~ o o ~ ~, 2 < p y t w° ~¢ Z N J 4 Q v w~ J 2 C t 2 A) O w i y 4~¢ i Z Q O 4: r y0 `~ ~~ ~` ° v¢ k V 6 2,, °~ O N ~i M 'ti 2~ h~ k M ~ O \~~ Q Z o 2 Z ° W 2\+"Zah°y i 2 ° uWQhRO w tiR H2>bp~~~1 G i~ ~ ~t0 ~ j ~ 02°y~lb ZZ~2 Zy W ~~ 1~ DO ~~~ ~ w < U¢ V bey<2ym N22 n W n3w 420 v ~~ ~ ~~ ~ `¢. 1- o V o ~; ¢ ~ N V 0 A \u. o~ y o 2 ~ o w o y o~ o g 2 v; °v i v? ° e y> o v e ., ~ e Q e a 2 2 n F b y o o v V ¢ ° _ ~ u h;t2o o2Wh:y8"nt$W >oxo¢ .°~N\°,W°wit2.d~'oa yi ° ~2WO °¢~o~¢$c'e bowQW°~WII ~ QJC ~~ ~ ~ ~ZO~ 2y w Z'ti e 2 ~°Z 2 ~ A¢ ~ w ~ ~V nw 30 `; 22 nw?~m 3Q~¢ Z o~~~ h C Mm y,V ¢ w'\ 2~n V n~b}e `I ~D ~~ (~~ ti F~2ti26 W,20ti~°~°~~QON w "~2 tibQ;i¢~.i°¢2m~ [°\\.m~ y"~aba tr`QQ o2 V o-.~c12v;(~^n 0 ~~~ lV~ iN V 8 0 2 2 ¢ °2 ; UVU m° p a o y o w w a ~ n b 4 L ~. ~' ¢ w~ e N~ a B °= o w ~ Q y~ F Z p w Q B Q 3 h¢~~ M~ ~ `V ~' ~;ia°O< =[,big'i~°b~F°eQW.~`o9~iFeabi°`.o~R~'ov°Wixo$Q wey°~~ oh`?g~at~~WO y„~ ~I ti3~ \~ ~ o o V w 2 ~ 2 ~ i w n L ¢ o o v V ° N ~ ~: ~ 8! h e O V 2 8 b¢¢ > ° V¢> v y ,a, ° V m try m 2 '~ ° `.~ x w Q ti ~ ti o o r~ e t o y J^ b° F o e ~ w o t q v 8 v~ 2 a" ¢! n t" b ¢ ti~~ ~> °O ! $ ~¢ Ob40.° a2 A t° O wZ ~°vb FiQu Z ti> ^. j F ~w'ti 2w2~Q °Q ~ti~° 2! ~ ~• ~ ~ ~ ~~ o F O e o m¢ N e w ¢° w b 3~ ¢ 2~~ y v~ v F 2 ° y~ `c , w a tt w x ~°° 2° ° Z y° ~ F° t~ y o 2" y g H ° o° 4 p e> pp w° 3 u ¢ Q o°>~ a~ y t e 2 V 1. e t V b 2 H~ 3° °¢¢ k i¢ y ; U .m 2 Z y iNj p V V o 2 V Q °e Q 2 i ~ i 2 w~ o o~ Q 4 v b ~ e t v¢ ti j¢ n Q i° 8$ V; Q ~, b°¢°. $ p„ e N n F 2 '^ ¢ ~ ,°, 2 x a ro> 2 \°. R; N ~ ~ tl Qb>~¢ ";oeRo¢-wtiYWiB~"~y°O¢o°~o„$~ZB~~~iQaY ~o^t~~no~°?i~3i~~VO~2~2~ ~ i ¢ w w g i° v 8 b 2 V b v m x~¢ t '^ ¢ t 8 ~ o aw i W 2 N o w t> ~n bb °¢ H ,x, ^ w ti u m 2 y: 8 x n° C w °~ t 2 2 t¢¢> ~. w~ E? m Q~~= i V° 0 2 n~~ i N Su ~~ i Q 2 0 0 '~a ~ O nie'+ W nii+tiuF x`°>eb n -420¢¢ o m"b$ Q b °w.2 a^V FQ"° a> vh2 ~ a ~:oo~ o¢bv~>?8$W~aooi~Q~2j~~op4UOOW~~¢~°gc w`i°`~oQ3e~,u,2">~~~~vv~ti~~4~ o n o ~ 2 m ~ o m 8 m e v y ~ F i i ., ~ i°. ~' o m v u i° ~ e 3~~ 3 ~~ 2 8 8 v c ~' 0 2¢ 3 ~ h h m V~ Q ~' Z~~ b ~ m n~ .. ~n°iw °~utNW??n['F^t~2wo$uQt1.~~ii'°\¢8~o~v°~vQ~ 2°2~RC4 ~oWb~~hQO Neio>~ ~ opts , ~ a 4 W 8 Z i °i ,2< t 4 W t ~ ~ g^ w¢ 2 8~ n \°, ~ N o o j w g° „ o Q e o~ 2~ w ~ e':= V W~ Q t n 4 rt o 2 n~~ e o 4 y ti y V c ~ :,i!. Wp ¢ m2 .¢ V O tm > Ep O ~ Sb 2° e y w wrw'~ W O yHtw V O ¢R1 h i t¢„ W 4 O=~ m U m J 1 t y o e° L~ v 2 0 n 4 R t ~ O v O U V j~ v ti L 4 m V 2 i4u m w Z O n w 'e ~ ki 3¢ O \,\ o~ W w o .. 4 0? w ~ ~ w ~ F b~= i° w \ n 2 Z ~ o° o o Z m o 2 i Y ti o£ V b° ~ c o y"y~~ h L t p1$ 2 Q 8 b`b N L =a ¢~ 4 2 Q W WOO 2 U O~ t~ 2 v a 3 J O v W b W Q^ y t V~ f in e 2°° m M° z 10 ~ O e n O~~ 2 4 24 b y¢~ 0 A W 3 b ~ V m v 2 0 2 pp¢ 2 w o. o e" x 3 0 0 3 W v J ~ bzoxo4,OVVe°<y¢2 ~wox2oEx">mt"oiiti A~i~oBQ~~~ti~N~~~ebtonagi~V£Qy W ~R,, 3 v 2 2~ i\¢ i i 2i y 2 y 4 2 e i°~~ t i V i° ~ 4 y~ o y > y i i° yy \; 2 0 X 4 Z 2 t~ ~[ ~ 2~ 2~ ti~ ~i v i n n a t m y e~ r n f K n Y i J x x R e n O w t w~. V o 8 ti . u m 1( 2 w e 8 ~i 8 o O t b u V o ty u V¢ ~ v ~ e ~ ~ w ~ Y ti 2~ ~ F ~ O ~ \ y N .wd ~M.v aar o~u~a~o .y , V ~ e o ~ A~II ~ o ti ` d aQO ~.~ O \'`~.t ~ ~ ~ ` ory r ` w t _ l \~~ n b wi \ O ~ 4 O •V ~ ~ ~ O O ~ d ~ N ~ ~ q ~ I i M /^~~ `4a t~ \ ~ 1 t ° v b~ b y b W 3 ;~ b W; 2 L y v ~ 1 ' ~ °88~ ~ ~ • ' $, 11 ~$ N l it ! _"-zss._ ~ ^ $8 ~ R888$ 8 h~ :,R ~o xL e U Q $ o~ ~~~~ o b~~ o `Z o a a h r ^ ~ a . p ~ O n m N 4 b ~: i~ O$ M d a O 4 ~ O a 8N8°o8°oe gg8ev{~.~.,8 N 8 ~ n ^ ^ n ° ~~^ A n~ O O O 6 b; Y y r^ V Y 8~ °r n n =`< g o y '8.8880~8~8~8~8.°088$8.Y ~°•-°~~8 _ o v ~ ~ ~ M ~ v a ~ n° ... w `v w ~ a ab H.~io.~ 7t O j? b F`. ¢ Z 3 y L ~ v= v~; b; 3~; L~~ b v ui 8888888 88~ °08888 888:7 Q J p . „O~m^'1Mg!^yV V~OOVYMN y ° ' aa~~aa~ ;~" ^ ° i ~ i ^ 2^ n 2 n . ~ ii 2 2 s i N i x ~ ° v ~ w " ^ ^ ^ v N o ? ~ h b ~ w R ' e w:° o v~ o ti o R o n i~ ~ , 888888ogg„ 'h8888°,~w8 ~ e t 82E°" ~n~ g$° ~8 ~<~~ ~ ~ . ~ i P. 4 V ! ~ Z O~ 8n ~! ^`~ o On oO~1^qJ w \. 880~~888~°0~°008~88~88~88~8~8~8 8 ~ ~ •°,NO8~o:~:8.°, :888° ~6 sic;^^.~3R~h;y&k~;: . ^ ~G ~ .. ~ ^ . S N • ^ ~ ^ ^ ; p e O Q ; ¢2~~R~ ~ b 2 ~ ° V \ ¢ QQwFNme h is ~ e .QV vv24 W N Q 1 v~ L~~~° b V V0 ¢ V ~ d ; Y b x ~ ~! ~ C¢Ob V ~ ~O d ~ O hh32`~i ~ Y° < `p CCC C ¢ 2 0 \. b~ y ° 2 8 x° O t b R~ ~ . ~~ 8 ~ y C ~ V ¢ 2 ~~O4Rltsy ~ V m N y E ° .~ 7Q~ c ie~~ 0 F °e `Qv \1 n V Q \~'N. ° 1 0 ~~ \ \ 2 ~ .i 1 i \ 1 1 4 I ~ I O o~ e w O 0 v Q ° 2 0 E~ h 4 2 a u i .~ ~ m v ~; ¢ z p ! t V S( o35:R:'x vR95S S ^ ° ~ ` ~ Y ^ °a c 2 y ~°~~ " F ~ ° 0 ~ ° 8 v : ^ ° , < ~ ~ M Q ~ o w ~ ^ ^ ~ 2 ~±~~~,:v3 a; ~ ~ ^ ° ti V b J~ . a°. n w ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ '~ V v Y Y ~ ~ \ ti 1. Q 3 3 2 3 2 2; 3 v v y y; b 3 S t 2 2 e 0 0 _.°. °o .~ ~ ~R ~8 ~8 ~ ~8 ~8 ~8 R '8 ~g '~ ~8 X8.8 = N , ¢ „ ,R ~ w 0 8 ^ 2 2 2 2 2~ z 2 t e ^^^$^ 2~ ~ ~ ~. ^~ b J w b a ~ w i} ~ 1 e ~y ° ~~-- I AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 9, 1996 ORDINANCE 010996-10 AMENDING AND REENACTING ORDINANCE 82592-12, THE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR ROANORE COUNTY, BY THE ADOPTION OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS CONCERNING COMMERCIAL INDOOR AMUSEMENTS IN THE VARIOUS ZONING DISTRICTS OF THE COUNTY WHEREAS, on August 25, 1992, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted Ordinance 82592-12 which enacted a new zoning ordinance for Roanoke County; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission for Roanoke County held its public hearing on this amendment on December 5, 1995, and has recommended approval of the ordinance adopting these amendments to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia; and, WHEREAS, in the interest of public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice, the Board of Supervisors hereby amends certain provisions concerning commercial indoor amusements in the various zoning districts of the County; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law, and that the first reading and public hearing of this ordinance was held on December 12, 1995; and the second reading was held on January 9, 1996. BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the Zoning Ordinance for Roanoke County, adopted on August 25, 1992, be, and hereby is, amended and reenacted, as follows: 1. That Section 30-29-5, Commercial Use Types be amended by the addition and modification of the use type descriptions for commercial indoor amusement as follows: 1 ARTICLE II DEFINITIONS AND USE TYPES SEC. 30-29 USE TYPES; GENERALLY Sec. 30-29-5 Commercial Use Types COMMERCIAL INDOOR AMUSEMENT IG~, v 1u~v vJ ua~~~..v, w..wa ` T ~ " "' t.• ' ~ ~ ~ ,..a ,., a ,. ~ ti... ~ i .. ,., a e-~ ab d CC aT-a-se~~r r~s-rc le-i 9 6 i ~ ~ d ~h ~~~n~:~::><>:w~ a~ ~a~ ~ a ~ ~-ay~d~> : ::>::»:: >: amps es -~re Or : > . ;.;:.;:. . :: :: .~ :: P::::::::::.i:.i: ;:.;:.;:.;:.;; :::::::.::.... :.;~.;:.;:.;:.;;;;;:;.;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.; :::.. :::: •.y:..}'::.}'::.: ~ iiiiY.: :•.. ::: Y:::: ii. iii . '~'l~ ':.. .:.~~A~ ::'~:::•:::::~i: .ii ii:.::~':i' v:viiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~:vii: iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii:~: i:L;: ' .:::::.::::: ::.:::.:....:... : [,....,..' is ii:...:.. ~.i:U:.... :; ..,:...:..:: iii: ::: ..,:...:....::::....:. :.: y~ J~~/!~y~+~~ 'j ~+y j~+]M' ':.iii::Sfi~:: t:::~:1:~:::::i::~:~V~4/.iFF:i{i~..~ i:::iS.1i~::::i:::~Y~"71!!iii:::::is~~~~ .:::.......... :::::::::.~ :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::..:.......................... iryi7.i~!~'.~i~'.)'~: :p. .y~:i::i: '~. ~: ii::::I:#i1V!:7:~.W.~~~~::i:::::~~:!V^i?i? .............................................:.:::::::::. ~::::...... ..................:. :v : :.:::::::::::::::::::::::::.::::::::::::::::::i. . .. ...:':.{i}:::::::::::: '.::::~.:::::.::.i'::.:iiii:':: ~h~.:.::r?~~t.~s?~~:t.::: :v:'?i:':i1:isi~'i::i::i::ii:t: i:.i::: ryiiiiiiiiii:^:.i:.iiiiiiiii: is is ".i:.:':.iii:: '.iiiiiiiJi"^:.i:.i:::.iiiiiii:v:?:;:~::nisi'.:iiiiii":'~"i:i:::i::i::i::i:::: ... '::: :...:...:.::" v? :...:.......... ::. :::: i.:...:..:._ :,:.:.:. :....: _: ''. :. .. .i:.i:~ : is is '. .:. J:. .. . :::~~[~~:.is~~~..~.i;:.~.flu...i::.:::::~ :::::::::.::::::::::::::::::.:::::::::::.::::::::::.::.: }is:i:?vi:Y:i::i::i::i::iii:vi:::: ::i::i::i::i:.. :::::::...::::::::::::::::::::: f.. i:.i:.i:.i:.i:.i ;.is:.i:.ii:.i:.;:.i:.i:::.i:.i;;:~ :<::::.::::>:::>:::::»:«:::>::>:::>::>::>:> ::: ;::> :>:::::>::>::>::> :<::>::>::>::>::>::>::: ;::::>: <:>::>:;~::: ~.;:;.::>::»:<::».... . . :>::: ;r u~~ :>:::<:>:s>~m.~ ~.. ate:€:€:>::. 4~7~.::::::.~.Ilt~.::::: ~.~,~..~.:.~.z',,~'f~.::::: ~ ..:........................:.::.::::::::::::::::::::::.:::::::::::::::.::::::::::::.:::::.::::::::::::::::::::::.;:.i:.i:.i:.iiii:.i:.iii;:.i:.i:.i:.ii::.;:• ~.::.i:.;:.i:.i:.i:.i:.ii:..:: i ::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:::.::::::::::::::::::::::.;:.i:.i:.;:.ii:.ii:.::.;:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.: ~::::::::::::::.:::::::::::.:::::::::::::................................. ........::.:.. yy..::.i: .~r.,A::;~~:F:1;G.isi::: :.>:.:::~:>::>::>::i:::::»::>::>::>::>::>::>r~::i::i»: ~ <: ~ ::>::>::>::>::>::i::i::iii::i::>::r,:i::i::>::i: ~:>::i::<:::: ~ ~::;~::>::>:::::;: >:>: .:..:rya.~#::.:::..:~:;::>:~T~Sr'11e~::<:cQr::>~i~?'~::':~':....: ii~.~,r,.;.?f,.;:~:...~.1~...~".~.......fi ...........::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~... ;:;i> :;:i:::;:::>::::<:;:i:;i>: 4;:<:>::::> ;:~F ~'~':::::::~ Q ~::>: ............................... :.:........................::.~:: :;>::>::»i;:tz:N:::::i:::;:.:i::>:::: '<`::> ~:> :: :~~`c'x~~'. :.4... ...... :::: ~<.;:.:.:.i:.>:.i:.i:.i:.i:.>:.ii>:1:~: >:.i:.::.i:<:::.:::.i:.>•:.>:.>:.i:.>:.i::..i>i>i:.>i:.i:.i:.;~:.>: .. ~ ~.>:~>: .;~:. :::: ....:. ..>...i end.::: a~.s~.iii:~:~:x'~ .: .s:.i::.•isai>:.>:.>:.>:.>:.i:.>:.;;;:::":::;::isi::;::i::;::;::;::ii::i:::i::i::i::i::i::::::;i:::>.;:::::::>~::::::>~.:;::;::;::::i::i::: `::i:: :.i:~' :4'~'~v.:M~.:'':::3:~:i~''.':~.:. :.'n~'i.: ~`.:i:::::~i ~::::::?~~.f.::>~.r+..~i,...~'ri.,~. ::::.:..................:..:::::::::::g`::::.f.:::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:.......... g' ................t:.:.......... i::i:'::i:Y'+.::: .. >:.i~~,.~ir,.~~.~..~~..:. t ..........:.:::::::::::::~.~.:: ......... .. .... i::.>:.>:.>:.:!! ::: :: .:.............. :::::::::::: ~P::.::::::::::: ................................... !<:•: iii':Y:i::i::i::i:::'':i::::::i:::~ ii::i::i::i::i::i::iii:v::~ i:::i::i::ii:::::i ~i:?~iii::i::i::i::i::i::i::ii::: "~:~:i "'~iiii:j,' ~:::: '$~i:< ii... i:.;:.:;. i:.:; ..::::. . ;.i:... . :.::.::.;:.ii:.i:.ii:.i:.: :.::::::::::::::::::::::::::~:::::::::::::::::.:::::::::::::::: ~::.i;~':.ii:.;:.i:.i:.i:.iii:::.::::::::::::::::::::::.:::::::::::::::::::: ...................................................................................... :.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 4 :::::::::.......................... .............................. .............................. ~?c< .....................:........ .............................. 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 2 r ORDINANCE 010996-10 - AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE APPENDIX A OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Circuit Court G. O. Clemens, Judge, Roy B. Willett, Judge Clifford R. Weckstein, Judge Diane McQ. Strickland, Judge Richard C. Pattisall, Judge Robert P. Doherty, Jr., Judge Steven A. McGraw, Clerk Juvenile Domestic Joseph M. Clarke, Philip Trompeter, John B. Ferguson, Joseph P. Bounds, Ruth P. Bates, C1~ Intake Counsellor Relations District Court II, Judge Judge Judge Judge irk General District Court John L. Apostolou, Judge George W. Harris, Judge William Broadhurst, Judge Vincent Lilley, Judge Julian H. Raney, Judge Theresa A. Childress, Clerk Thomas S. Haislip, Director, Parks & Recreation Elaine Carver, Director, Procurement John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance O. Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Michael Lazzuri, Court Services Don C. Myers, Assistant Administrator Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue Thomas C. Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue Bill Rand, Director, General Services Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Magistrates Sherri Krantz/Betty Perry John H. Cease, Police Chief Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant Administrator Main Library Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, SW, Rke 24016 Roanoke County Code Book 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. f\ " AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 9, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Second Reading on petition of Roanoke County Planning Commission to amend the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance to define bingo halls/rooms as a permitted use with a Special Use Permit. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: /J BACKGROUND• In the past few months the staff has received inquiries on establishing a bingo parlor in the County. In responding to these inquiries, the staff realized that this use was not specifically addressed in the current ordinance. To remedy this, the attached amendment, prepared in Ordinance form by the County Attorney's Office, has been prepared. The amendment proposed consists of redefining the use type, Commercial Indoor Amusement, to broaden the description of uses covered and specifically add bingo and similar games. This use type is currently allowed only in the C-2, General Commercial district with a special use permit from the Board of Supervisors. This approach is consistent with that of the surrounding jurisdic- tions and would afford an opportunity to consider the location, hours of operation and other characteristics of a bingo parlor before it is established in the County. The Planning Commission held its public hearing on December 5, 1995, and has recommended approval. The Board of Supervisors held its public hearing on December 12 and approved the first reading. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: 1. That the Board of Supervisors approve Second Reading of the proposed amendments to the Zoning Ordinance. ~ s Respectfully submitted, ~. Terrance Harringto Director, Plannin and Zoning Action Approved ( ) Motion by Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to ~~ 2 Approved, y ~ C ~'. t Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Vote No Yes Abs Eddy Harrison Johnson Minnix Nickens K-I AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 9, 1996 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING ORDINANCE 82592-12, THE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR ROANORE COIINTY, BY TH8 ADOPTION OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS CONCERNING COMMERCIAL INDOOR AMOSEMENTS IN THE VARIOIIS ZONING DISTRICTS OF THE COIINTY WHEREAS, on August 25, 1992, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted Ordinance 82592-12 which enacted a new zoning ordinance for Roanoke County; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission for Roanoke County held its public hearing on this amendment on December 5, 1995, and has recommended approval of the ordinance adopting these amendments to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia; and, WHEREAS, in the interest of public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice, the Board of Supervisors hereby amends certain provisions concerning commercial indoor amusements in the various zoning districts of the County; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law, and that the first reading and public hearing of this ordinance was held on December 12, 1995; and the second reading was held on January 9, 1996. BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the Zoning Ordinance for Roanoke County, adopted on August 25, 1992, be, and hereby is, amended and reenacted, as follows: 1. That Section 30-29-5, Commercial Use TXges be amended by v the addition and modification of the use type descriptions for 1 Y commercial indoor amusement as follows: ~_~ ARTICLE II DEFINITIONS AND USE TYPES SEC. 30-29 USE TYPEB; GENERALLY Sec. 30-29-5 Commercial Use Types thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. agenda \ code\ amu cement 2 ITEM NUMBER ~~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 9, 1996 SUBJECT: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1. BLUE RIDGE COMMUNITY SERVICES The three year terms of J. William Pistner, and Mrs. Cheri Hartman, Member at Large expired 12/31/95. Mr. Pistner has advised that he would be willing to serve another term. According to Dr. Fred Roessel, Executive Director, the BRCS will meet later this month and make a nomination for Mrs. Hartman's position which represents Roanoke County, and the Cities of Salem and Roanoke. The name of this nominee will be forwarded to the Board and must be confirmed by all three localities. 2. BUILDING CODE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS The four year term of Thomas A. Darnall, Architect, will expire 1/22/96. 3. HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION SAFETY COMMISSION The four year term of Ms. Jackie Talevi, Legal Representative expired June 30, 1995. Ms. Jackie Talevi, has served two consecutive terms and is not eligible for reappointment. i ~ ~ /-' SUBMITTED BY: Mary Allen,cCM~ Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Edd Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Y Harrison Johnson Minnix Nickens ~, ~G~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 9, 1996 RESOLUTION 010996-11 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM M - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. that the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for January 9, 1996 designated as Item M - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 5, inclusive, as follows: 1. Request for Appropriations to the School Operating and Grant Funds from the Virginia Commission for the Arts, the Virginia Department WorkKeys Pilot Project, the Department of Education School-to- Work Program and donations from the Education Foundation. 2. Request from the Police Department for acceptance of a Grant from the Department of Criminal Justice Services for Incident Based Reporting. 3. Donation of sanitary sewer and drainage easements in connection with development of a lot on Lynnson Drive owned by James K. Penn and Cheryl Walker Penn. 4. Donation of sanitary sewer easements in connection with development of Section No. 9 SteepleHunt of Canterbury Park. 5. Reaffirmation of appointment of Economic Development Director Timothy Gubala to the Southwest Development Financing Board of Directors. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this 1 I ; s resolution. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Dr. Deanna Gordon, School Superintendent Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance John H. Cease, Police Chief Timothy Gubala, Director, Economic Development Vickie L. Huffman, Assistant County Attorney 2 ACTION # A-010996-11.a ITEM NUMBER / ~' """ MEETING DATE: January 9, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Appropriations to the School Operating and Grant Funds ,, /~~'~~ COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ~/,~,~.~~,,~,,~.~~~~ ~~ ~f BACKGROUND: 1. The Virginia Commission for the Arts has awarded Roanoke County Schools $600 as touring assistance for the J. Plunky Branch program highlighting African-American contributions in music and art. The group has performed for Roanoke County students during the past few years. 2. The Virginia Department of Education has awarded the Tech Prep Consortium a WorkKeys Pilot Project Grant in the amount of $15,000. The project will involve five profilers--one from each of the four area community colleges and one from Roanoke County Schools who will be trained in matching employer requirements with the skills and competency levels of students. The grant includes 6 - 8~ indirect costs. 3. The Virginia Department of Education has awarded Roanoke County Schools $12,000 for the School-to-Work program. The program will provide voluntary after-school "apprenticeships" for students in the workplace. 4. The Roanoke County Public Schools Education Foundation has received donations designated for certain programs. Donations totaling $1,149 have been designated for the "Bridging the Gap" substance abuse program. The remediation program is to receive $1,000 from designated donations. The contributions will become additional revenue for the School Operating Fund. FISCAL IMPACT: None of the above require additional local funding. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends appropriation of $27,600 to the School Grant Fund for the following: $600 from the Virginia Commission for the Arts, $15,000 from the Virginia Department of Education WorkKeys Pilot Project, $12,000 from the Virginia ~,_ i -2- Department of Education School-to-W School Operating Fund for donations foundation. arland J. 'dd Director of Vocational & Adult Education Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ork Program; and $2,149 to the received through the education Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION Motion by: Motion by H. Odell Minnix VOTE No Yes Absent Eddy x Harrison x Johnson x Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Dr. Deanna Gordon, School Superintendent Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance /h- I J~ FROM THE MINUTES OF THE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE COUNTY MEETING IN REGULAR SESSION AT 6 R.M. ON DECEMBER 14, 1995 IN THE BOARD ROOM OF THE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA. RESOLUTION REQUESTING APPROPRIATIONS BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO THE SCHOOL OPERATING AND SCHOOL GRANT FUNDS. WHEREAS, the Roanoke County School System has received unbudgeted revenue for the 1995-96 school year from the following sources: 1. The Virginia Commission for the Arts - $600 touring assistance for the J. Plunky Branch program, which is additional revenue to the School Grant Fund; 2. Virginia Department of Education - $15,000 for the WorkKeys Pilot Project to train five job profilers--one from each of the four area community colleges and one from Roanoke County Schools. The award became effective November 10, 1995 and will end June 30, 1996. The project will be geared to match employer requirements with the skills and competency levels of the students. The grant is additional revenue to the School Grant Fund. 3. Virginia Department of Education - $12,000 for the School-to-Work program. The project will provide students voluntary after-school "apprenticeships," workplace opportunities to apply knowledge learned in the classroom, mentorship experiences, and will forge and solidify partnerships between students and parents, educators and employers, community-based organizations, school systems and the community college. The grant is additional revenue to the School Grant Fund. 4. Donation to the Roanoke County Public Schools Education Foundation designated for the "Bridging the Gap" substance abuse program - $1,149, which is additional revenue to School Operating Fund Account 000210-0523; and 5. Donation to the Roanoke County Public Schools Education Foundation designated for the remediation program - $1,000, which is additional revenue to School Operating Fund Account 000210-0523; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County School Board of Roanoke County requests appropriations as heretofore defined for the 1995-96 school year. Adopted on motion of Maurice L. Mitchell and duly seconded, and on the following recorded vote: AYES: Thomas A. Leggette, Maurice L. Mitchell, Frank E. Thomas, Michael [~?. Stovall, Jerry L. Canada NAYS: None TESTE: ~~~~ L _,~~:"--~--'- _ Clerk c: Mrs. Diane Hyatt Mrs. Penny Hodge /y-- FROM THE MINUTES OF THE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE COUNTY MEETING IN REGULAR SESSION AT 6 P.M. ON DECEMBER 14, 1995 IN THE BOARD ROOM OF THE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA. RESOLUTION REQUESTING APPROPRIATIONS BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO THE SCHOOL OPERATING AND SCHOOL GRANT FUNDS. WHEREAS, the Roanoke County School System has received unbudgeted revenue for the 1995-96 school year from the following sources: 1. The Virginia Commission for the Arts - $600 touring assistance for the J. Plunky Branch program, which is additional revenue to the School Grant Fund; 2. Virginia Department of Education - $15,000 for the WorkKeys Pilot Project to train five job profilers--one from each of the four area community colleges and one from Roanoke County Schools. The award became effective November 10, 1995 and will end June 30, 1996. The project will be geared to match employer requirements with the skills and competency levels of the students. The grant is additional revenue to the School Grant Fund. 3. Virginia Department of Education - $12,000 for the School-to-Work program. The project will provide students voluntary after-school "apprenticeships," workplace opportunities to apply knowledge learned in the classroom, mentorship experiences, and will forge and solidify partnerships between students and parents, educators and employers, community-based organizations, school systems and the community college. The grant is !^. A-010996-11.b ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER ~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER. MEETING DATE: January 9, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Acceptance of a grant by the Roanoke County Police Department from the Department of Criminal Justice Services (DCJS) to assist in implementing Incident Based Reporting (IBR). COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND• The Commonwealth of Virginia is mandating police agencies go to Incident Based Reporting. To facilitate this endeavor, DCJS is offering 50/50 matching funds grants to procure equipment. These grants must be obtained for fiscal year 1996 and will not be available afterwards. The records management software used by the County Police is not compatible with mandated IBR requirements. The police department must have a software upgrade developed. FISCAL IMPACT• This is a 50% DCJS ($19,000) to 50% County ($19,000) matching funds grant. The grant was not available during 1995 budget preparation, and will be disbursed prior to fiscal year 1996. The local match will come from rollover funds from the police department's budget for the current year. No additional manpower will be needed as a result of this grant. • ..1 rr-- a STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Staff recommends acceptance of the grants from the Department of Criminal Justice Services. Respectfully submitted, ~~ ohn H. Cease Chief of Police Approved by, C~~,~~'ti``i Mr. Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ------------- -------------------------------- ACTION ----------- -------- VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Motion by H. Odell No Yes Absent Denied ( ) Minnix Eddy x Received ( ) Harrison x Referred ( ) Johnson x To ( ) Minnix x Nickens x cc: File John H. Cease, Chief of Police Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance cc: File Chief Cease A-010996-11.c ACTION NO. ITEM NO. / ~ 1` AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 9, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Donation of sanitary sewer and drainage easements to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County in connection with development of a lot on Lynnson Drive owned by James K. Penn and Cheryl Walker Penn COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~ ~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This consent agenda item involves the donation of the following easements to the Board of Supervisors for sanitary sewer and drainage purposes upon, over, under and across lots on Grandin Road Extension to provide service in connection with development of a lot owned by James K. Penn and Cheryl Walker Penn at 5106 Lynnson Drive in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke: a) Donation of drainage and sanitary sewer easements, of variable width, from William V. Haynes and Penelope P. Haynes (Deed Book 980, Page 132) (Tax Map No. 76.05-1-13) shown and designated as "New S.S.E. and D.E. (width varies)" on a plat prepared by John R. McAden, L.S., of Balzer and Associates, Inc., dated January 26, 1995, revised April 11, 1995 and May 12, 1995, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. b) Donation of drainage and sanitary sewer easements, of variable width, from David R. Perdue and Denise G. Perdue (Deed Book 1440, Page 1459) (Tax Map No. 76.05-1-12) shown and designated as "New S.S.E. and D.E. (width varies)" on a plat prepared by John R. McAden, L.S., of Balzer and Associates, Inc., dated January 26, 1995, revised April 11, 1995 and May 12, 1995, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B. The locations and dimensions of these easements have been reviewed and approved by County staff. /Y~- 3 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of the above-described easements. Respectfully submitted, ~~ . Vickie L. Huffman Assistant County Attorney ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Motion by H. Odell No Yes Absent Denied ( ) Minnix Eddy x Received ( ) Harrison x Referred ( ) Johnson x To ( ) Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Vickie L. Huffman, Assistant County Attorney Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections e~ee~e EC11oN 2 ~-IIQDEN VA ~/ PL- ~LOG~ ~ MAP RoPNgK¢ 5c PNTy3 f T/ SOUK ~'-' O~ l 3 E ~ ~ O .7 ~ ZO DRAINAGE ~~ 7 y 5 8~ ' I ~~ __ .-} EASEMENT ~- Ex I 1 i No4'y~'42 E !1/.77 N i r~~~ JJJ °AVIp R.PERDVE pENI SE b. PERD°E , p.B. 144e Pe 1459 u 3 ~~ 11 M I ml~ 2~ C3 ro ` srl N~ ~ _ _l d , 5.5. ESMT. ~ ` ~•B. 133b PG.4om M M.N. /.. S2E , ~ ISM 1 '~ /~ to ~T TING P-Q+v LAT~RgE S•S. D.B. l;; ~ PG 1'. ~ 40 (o ' 0. ~q L ~~ NI,M,N gCR`r5 ° -~~ ~D~NE < 30' / ~ NE1M SS~~ ~(WIpTN BAR .E, ~ ES) p~/~ X IS T7 /VG ~.B. R 13; ~~s!'IT DRAINA6£ ~` S.S. ESMT. p.6.133G PY,. yob ~ 3 DeNA DFt. SHELL DoRTH`/ E . SHELL ~I `Q (Y) T.M. i(e.os ~I-~~ ~~~ ~ C1 DEL'I14 = 9°44'26" RADIUS = 500.00 ARC 85.00 TANGENT = 42.60 p~ CfIORD = 84.90 1 REARING= S 80°26'04 " W GRANDI/v `1 v o rA -(°/ 7o SLG oq p ~XTEN R T. ~ g ~ s/o DELTA = 1°37'50" R/w VAR I S RADIUS = 500.00 ARC = 14.23 TANGEDTI' = 7.12 CHORD = 14.23 BEARING = N84°29'23 " W C3 DELTA = O1°31'53 " RADIUS = 500.00 ARC = 13.37 TANGENT' = 6.68 CHORD = 13.36 BEARING = N 86° Oil 'NOTES -fO1NER OF RECORD: WILLIAM V. & PENEIAPE P. HAYNES 2. LEGAL REFERENCE: DEED BOOK 980, PAGE 132 3. TAX MAP NUMBER: 76.05-1-13 4. NO TITLE REPORT FURNISHED 5. PROPERTY IS IN F. E.M.A. DEFINED UNSHADED ZONE X EASEMENT PLAT FOR SAM ES ~• ~FNN SHOWING NEW SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT 5459 GRANDIN ROAD EXTENSION SW 0.291 ACRES DEED BOOK 98U PAGE 1.32 WINDSOR HILIS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA JANUARY 26, 1995 JOB NUMBER 95003-gyp ^R ~O~F MTro Re y nl •0 M K1 II t d . ~N.. u-- m 4' ~ W v 4 tll ~o~w~Al.rx o,~ r~ L ~ JDHtJ R. McADEN ~ . try. o~2oe2 ~° ~-zd-95 ~~~,~U SiJR`t~'~o~ 'saw ~ ,,,;,.+~ REVISED 4/11/95 TO SHOW EASEMENT TIES REVISED 5/12/95 TO SHOW EASEMENT TIES •PLANNERS•ARCHITECTS•ENGINEERS•SURVEYORS• 1208 CORPORATE CIRCLE, ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 772-9580 B~L-1L..1~ AN A880CIATEB.~yC. REFLECTING TOIAORROW EXHIBIT A l~- a~~ck HiDp~/v 4 S~~~rloN /Z~' PL. gkALL~y CouRT i 1-0~3 ' S P~.Z3 i / / / in 0 / /1 s '~ t ~oTz/~. / ~ /° ~~, /, c~ 5' i / L. / '~ ~ ~ f / O / 'O / y .~o ~' ~ ~ ~/ N 7332 52~E N/F \ '~ "'ItU C '~~/ / .`~'y\S~~D ~ ~'." -~~-3 y8o PGIiA3Zfi A / ~ F\ ~~. / ~ ,.a ~~ New ~ ~K ~ E S. S~~a h ~ w~~Te C~,3b3 ~ ,~~ ~,,~~ ~, -'„ CARIES) ~~ ~`~~ D`i°E~ N \ ,° \ / ~c i ~ n F CZ 6°~.b~ MtN,R~ ~ ~' ~ / ~ 1 \ ~~ yubPQ ~pAF ~~~/~ ~~ oP i ~~ \ /// XISrIN pK ~ti ~ X G A/NAG h / ~~ EAS E ? o ~~~, o f`f~ C~ O`\ pa 1336 P~ 399 ,~ _ \ \v ~ EklsnpG~ ~~~ S / D•6. l336 P~. yy ~'~~ 4 ~~ O~D ~ ~ ~ °~ ~ ~~ N~F~ ~ ~ 2~ I ~ o AN iT,~ RoEiNSo J, ~ • ~ ~~ A ,5^~ `~ ~~ ~ U` ~ s C2 RA~p TA ° 20 °45' S5 ~ ~ ~ DELTA = 0,° IUS = 500.00 ARC = 181 RADIUS = 5001'53' ~ 1f1NG 21 ~G _ 13 37 •00 ~ HORD~ 1801221 ~ ° 6 0'8 FARING = S84 °18'45' iW CHORD BEARING ZJN386°04'14' NOTES. W i OWNER OF ~GEND 2. L~AL REFEECORD: DAVID ~ IRON PIN 4.. NO ~ NUMBERS' DEED BpOK ~~OSE G. PERDUE ~ IRON PrN FoT PAGE ~D 5 TITLE REPORT F~6'05-1_12 1459 PROPERTY IS RNISHED N,.o+.ti REVISED IN F.C.M.A. DEFINED UNS 5/12/95 ' HADED .`~ ~EAL7Y1O f0 SHOW ZONE R ,~i G EAS~yE~N1' TIES USG ~ p~y~ ~~ 1 G+A n p Q ~ //~ ~r+ J A< M ~EfV'f pLAT Fp ~ JON, J R. M~gpEN ~ .~ SHOWING NEW ~.NIT~ ~ PR N ~ S467 EN ~, M6.002UU2 ~r~ GRA[vDI[V R ~Y SEWER ~ ~' C ~`26-q.5 d WINDSO ~ • 353 ~ENSIO[, ~~ -9 R HI ACRES 4,,d' ROANOK MAGISTERI,~ r'U~ 5•UR.VE`l~ E COUNTY DISTRICT' °''"'~'~~f RFVISF.p 4/11 JOB NUARY 26, '19~5INIA /95 TO SHOW~~ 95003-8 PLANNE EASF~NT TIC, 1208 CORpOAgRE C RECE S' ENGINEERS' ROgNOKE, VIRG URVE2Q 80. EXgIBIT B ~~ / t I A-010996-11.d ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 9, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Donation of sanitary sewer easements to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County in connection with development of Section No. 9 SteepleHunt of Canterbury Park COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : ~ ~~,yy/'„~wz.~ Z<: ~ (( SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This consent agenda item involves the donation of the following easements to the Board of Supervisors for sanitary sewer purposes upon, over, under and across Lots 9, 10 & 11, Block 1, Section No. 9 SteepleHunt of Canterbury Park (Plat Book 14, page 85) in connection with the development of said subdivision in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke: a) Donation of sanitary sewer easements, of variable width, from William R. Delamater and Sue Ann Delamater, (Tax Map No. 86.01-7-3), Richard W. Krause and Rosemary J. Krause (Tax Map No. 86.01-7-4), and Gene P. Berry and Carolee Berry (Tax Map No. 86.01-7-5) shown and designated as "NEW S.S.E. #l," "NEW S.S.E. #2," and "NEW S.S.E. #3," on a plat prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C., dated September 22, 1992, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. The locations and dimensions of these easements have been reviewed and approved by County staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of the above-described easements. -~ Respectfully submitted, Vickie L. Huffman Assistant County Attorney ACTION Approved (x) Motion by: Motion by H. Odell Denied ( ) Minnix Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) VOTE No Yes Absent Eddy x Harrison x Johnson x Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Vickie L. Huffman, Assistant County Attorney Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections i ,,' EXHIBIT A ,~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~n ~~ ~~ N ~W~~~ ~~~~ ~~~N~ ~r ~~~ ~'~2 ~ N ~~~ ~~~~o ~, ~~~~~ N ~,~ r _ ~~` ~f YJ ~ ~ ~ 1r' ~ CO ~ N a ~ e ~= ~r W ~ h a ~ 1 '~~~~ ~~ V / € /~ a ~ / ' t'waf ~ ; ro ~ ~ Via. a ~ ~J~ ~~ ~ ~ ~a 1 e Wa ! n ° I ,cam. '" a wrr.r~~td ~~~~ ~~~ ~~~ y s ,~ ~~WH=~ =ae~~RH~i ~' '. ~Hn ~•~g~~ ~Z6. -SID ~ a 1 w N ~ ~ /~ ~ $$•~ ~i n ir~~r~ ~~ ~A~i ~ h /"~~N 4J~ 1 ~ ~~' ~ M ~ ~~ xm 'L~ `~~0. wa • N~~ Wa ,~ o d G-sn7 ~ ~ ~' v ~ ~ j N A ~ 11. ~~°'~ ~ r N ~ ~4 N ~f -~ m » U„ a < rf ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~m gp~ ~~g-~ a H ," ~ + ~ +~ u a .~ p r ^~ a~ `~ ~ ~ h N o ~2d ~ ~ W ~y r ~'~iC i~ C W ~ /~ y j __~ , +- a sQ 'Dd wti '6'd 6 'ON tielt~S %~d ~-4~L~0.'! i+ iuM~ld~kS '. A-010996-11.e ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER //J" 5 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 9, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Reaffirmation of appointment of Economic Development Director Timothy Gubala to the Southwest Development Financing, Inc. Board of Directors COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Southwest Development Financing, Inc. has requested that the Board of Supervisors reaffirm the appointment of Timothy Gubala, Director of Economic Development, to their Board of Directors (see attached letter) . On January 24, 1995, Mr. Gubala was appointed to the Board of Directors for a two-year term which will expire on January 12, 1997. The Board of Directors has requested that the current term expire in January 1998. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors reaffirm their appointment of Timothy Gubala, Director of Economic Development, to the Southwest Development Financing, Inc. Board of Directors until January 1998. Mr. Gubala has indicated his willingness to serve. Submitted by: Approved by: ~ ~cl~- Mary H. Allen, CMC Elmer C. Hodge Clerk to the Board County Administrator Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: Motion by H. Odell Minnix VOTE No Yes Absent Eddy x Harrison x Johnson x Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Timothy W. Gubala, Director, Economic Development Southwest Development Financing, Inc. File /t~ ~~t SOUT~iWEST ~EVELOpMENT FINANCING, ~NC. PO Box 983 MaaioN, VA 24354 (703) 783-7624 voicE _ (703) 783-7999 fax MEMORANDUM TO: County Administrator/Chairman, Board of Supervisors City Manager/Mayor FROM: Fred W. Parker, Chairman, Board of Directors Southwest Development Financing, Ir~c. DATE: December 27, 1995 RE: Appointments to SDF Board of Directors At our Board of Directors meting ir: September 1995„ the Board voted to ask you to appoint or reaffirm your appointment to our Boarra at your regularly scheduled meeting in January 1996. The primary reason for this request is the irregularity of appointments during the past four years. We would also like for you to take into consideration, the attendance of yuur appointee ;vhen deliberating your appoirrtr.~ent. The attached chart will indicate your current appointment to our Board, and their attendance record over the past few meetings. The Board of Directors of Southwest Development Financing will meet quarterly during 1996. The scheduled meetings are for the 4th Thursday in January, April, July and October at 3:00 PM. "i'he locatio+i will move around the Ninth Congressional District. The appointment. which you r-rake in January 1996 will be for two years. We will ask yon! in January 1998 to make the two year appointment again. Southwest Development Financing has approved over :n950,000 in loans to tourism relatzd projects in the past year. Our efforts will enhance tourist expenditures throughout the District. We hope you will be diligent in you consideration of your representative to serve on our Board of Directors. Best wishes for the New Year! A TOURISM REVO~VINC~ LOAN FUNd ~~ ~y M u F• w w s ,~ .~ ~ y y h ~* v 7 W U ~ N Q J D ~ U y Q ~ W O ~ C] d u a x x x x x x x N i r x x x r N O~ O~ I .- x x x x r i n i 0~ i x x x x x ~ N a x x x x x x x i 1 1 O~ 1 ~C ~C X ~C X r• I 1 M P x ' x x ~ N r P x x ~C ~C x N ~ L ~ m "~ ~ O~ _ ~ ~ W ~ I _ ~ O ~ ~ L N L I v 6 ~ T U v L T L L J V C T C ~ IQ ++ ' C 4- V ~ O 41 C L fp ++ Y T~ L L C~ ~ ~ ~ V .L VI U X -~ Ip • O O ~ Y O L C U +~ O W 7 47 Ti Q1 L O C ~ r y w N TV 7 Ip C T~ ++ O v A W T T C •--~ OJ U 7 C O L N L Q1 ~p ~ N V 2 7 W N u_ L U ~ ~ L +~ ~ O a ~ J H CD -, C7 ~ O Z 7 IQ E ~ O C 7 3 N O V E c fp C O c >.• A 0 3 m Ll ~+- W Y L O C C 10 7 V V L C 41 7 0 7 J U H F L V Ip H c Y- V- N Y- Y-F- V Y 10 J -' O VL O U V C J 7L E ~ ~r v~ y O Y L O L U O~ 7 O L C ' c ~ > C~ C a U a m O N (0 L O~ O) U N N T ~ O m> Y O) w C 3 C 1+E 1+f V a Y[fl W U L ' Tv J A T N Y N N N O ~ ~ 'r V "' U 'r V 'r V CD U 7 m 3 10 V Na y L V U d .r D ~ J lL ~ (;~ ~ ~ (7 ~ ~ J CO ~ ~ 7 m 2 Q _ ~`/1-S X X X X X N r x x x x x x x r N O~ ~ t" X X X X r I -_. _ -~ ~ _ O~ X X X X X X X N r P 00 X X X X X X r 1 O~ 1 d X X X~ X M I P 1 N x x x X r M O L I ~O x N x X X i C m W 1 1 = O~ L 1 ~ N ~ c Y C a ~O ~O 1-I L N mV Td C N y Z C 10 C O T> >, N 7 C U 10 Gl T~ C 7 -~ 7 T J Y L Y A O C d A 3 ~+ ~ U~ O N C W C 10 V 10 C Y O C L r ~ ~ ' 3 O 'O O 3 7 O Y- -i r N U J T L J N ~ W O c.i •r C N Y ~ F_ T O a W •r C 'O c i ' O E Q1 E L Y 4- t ; L r v C dl C - ~ C •r N O N F+ 7 N 10 G1 L .C L N C L W C (pH N!-f OG] T~ NU hW N O Y~ I ~ O 7 U ~ ~ ~ ~ y N H 3 3 3 ~- i GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA of General Amount Fund Revenues Beginning Balance at July 1, 1995 (audited) $6,994,906 8.09% Addition from 1995-96 Budget 10,558 Sept 12, 1995 Donation to IDA - Rusco (127,500) Balance at January 9, 1996 $6,877,964 7.95% The Board has recently requested a change in the way we present the Unappropriated Fund Balance, to include all pending appropriations. Changes below this line are for information and planning purposes only. These amounts have not been appropriated to fund balance at this time. The increase in projected 1995-96 revenues is based on the most recent estimate of the year in process, and could be adjusted up or down as the year progresses. These funds are not available to be appropriated to other projects at this time. Balance from above $6,877,964 Pending Adjustments Recommended increase in 1995-96 budgeted revenues based upon 1st quarter review 2,371,305 $9,249,269 10.70% Note: On December 18, 1990, the Board of Supervisors adopted a goal statement to maintain the General Fund Unappropriated Balance at 6.25% of General Fund Revenues 1995-96 General Fund Revenues $86,464,490 6.25% of General Fund Revenues $5,404,031 Respectfully Submitted, ~;~~~,Y.~~c.`. ;~~ -~~ ~~ Diane D. Hyatt M:\Finance\Common\Board\Gen95. WK4 ~-~ CAPITAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Amount Beginning Balance at July 1, 1995 (audited) $405,409.00 July 17, 1995 Payment on sale of old School Administration Building 399,984.00 Aug 18, 1995 Sale of land adjacent to Kessler Mill Road to VDOT 1,020.00 Balance at January 9, 1996 $806,413.00 Respectfully Submitted, Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance The above does not include a note receivable from the sale of the old School Administration Building due July 1, 1996 for $200,000. M:\Finance\Common\Board\Cap95. WK4 ~'- 3 RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Amount .Beginning Balance at July 1, 1995 (Unaudited) $1,773.00 From 1995-96 Original Budget 100,000.00 July 27, 1995 Survey of Needs -Four Year University (2,500.00 Sept 26, 1995 Red Line Service - CORTRAN (6,023.00 Nov 21, 1995 County share of Cox Cable Audit (1,700.00 Dec 12, 1995 Expenses related to Comprehensive Plan update (29,166.00 Dec 12, 1995 Sister City program (1,000.00 Dec 12, 1995 VML / VACO APCO Steering Committee (4,000.00 Balance at January 9, 1996 $57,384.00 Respectfully Submitted, XJ Ltz~-.~~ ~j ~~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance 1 4 r L . r,' >i. ' S 1. 1 ;".t ,: ;: I ~- / t r.. • \. , _ _ L: O O O O O O O O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 +0000000 ~IPPPUINUTA A A W W W W W W W(ONNNNNNNNN-~--~-~-~ O wNPNoW A -~oP-oOON O.o W-JAN-~o.o W~.IPU1A WN-~oJeW NCO a -1OO mL0 £ N2 ~3Nn n.'9-11-On~vr>O~1S C-1271 Nl7r vv-o -Oz 2 -1 .+ ti n• ~+ a 7 0 • w N 7 7• ~^ 7 r• • Y 7 ~~ Y O ~ Y O -7 C O O Y• C• • O a 7 7 C r 7 r a 7 n N r a Y < 7 O•• '1 7 ~+ S x .~ .- x A a N 7 n v: 7 Q '7 a 7 a a n ti• -u 7 I O n^ '1 7•• a 9 N^ 4^ ••• rip 0 7 .~ N a^ Y r b r -~ N 7 '1 a Y -1 a s ['1 <• V m~ p 0 >R Y '1 ^ ~' ~- p1 7 n 7 C r• r r p O -1 T ~ '1 I n a • ~- I•• C n ti Y r ~ 7• 9 7 r n 7 m -1 O a ~1 n ~- O N a ~+ 7 r N N W• a 0 0 N 7 -1 I P++c O< r W • to ~ a Y 111 a -i 7 ~~ a 0 ~ m a a a 7 N 7 9 y 6 f1 Y ~• h p '! Y ~+ N r .~ r a m ~a~wawxma~Y-~~, arc oxvar 7• mr..• o a r as ~ vo a-7ooti n ao•yo.-z~ r n~u1~•vn om avl• v,a-Ino•~-1-7•nt~o c.~^•nn•n-~.-cw <~• 7I nol~~o o ~.-o ca oo7G ~--1 v• anran.+ rw.-o c .-ynnnn mnmul 'ofn3 y Y~ ro Yroom xs.--1 •- n~o-1 z ~ ~~.II --a~.aa» NG a -eyn ar -1 Iny ~ra•..••a o I ~rJn T,a ~a In rul zyv7c•m ~- •a•ar W.-xc7 yx aiarar gor<n~••-n 7'*I ao ar ••+ .+tl.f• vl .- n m D C m ~- ~ a .~ UI • m• O -1 ~ n O N O -< ul O a 41 O CA a '1 n n C O • 'll 3 a ~~ • -I '1 y~ C D -1 a '7 a O. 7 a • O 7 N 71 q O x 0 7 Y ti • 'D -1 -,-a-J.-.~ cau,a-ua • o~ ~m xa -+HOa na.-<nc aaa m ro as w x Y~~x a ~ a~ c 3 N M x a x a• ~ n •- R~ fn .~ O a T • O 'I W a w p~ n O m µ a N 7 +- O I Ili D I a a a O ~^~'~ a N ~c rN N 7 i n 4•~ 3 r '1 N O W a a I a h I o y • w .0 I ! ~ W o+ P u I .- - W - ~. ,N ~ N A VI ~ P .o i O o jv J+ 1n +0 J A W W WNN O A -N O P W PAJODW W W ~1N O N N mNO. oUI UI +ooA OP•.IA-J ODNA Ago UINNOOOVI -J UIOA W+O ~I -JOO 111 N Ito ++W oNUIO UIP WNPNUIJ O-~A~1 UIONOOOOUIoooooUl Uloo ` 4 AU1 ol1DO N ooUION W oN0~0o000000000000000000 ~1 v Ia~N (J oJO UI o W ooU1 UloooOp o0 00000 000000 00 o O o0 ^I -J I.li -W O P O W o W OO ~ Po O 00 0000000 O OO OOO OOO OO o I A A i ^l -J iVI AN W ~ NW A N P a, .o -tONw A o+o w -N ~1- w- +o ~J UI wNw ~l A A I1.1 W JA--o P-JP A OAO WUi BONA WANW WO AW N NUI~CO a P to NI ULANww W- --W ~ WUI..pp W+Oln~JN PN A~1O W A.p~O UI Ut ~0' o Otp N-+1PN ~I P-NANO ODwo-..p»Op •+1 00 PW N ~ VIN Ut W W N - +D -~ o m W N O N V1 ~0 - ~O A OD o N ~O O -~ -• o o N W UI ~O OD o UI N ro ! A A ~ I - - w tD O~m A-JAN- U1A -- -- ~1N A NPUI ~1 -~NA~o A A ;-J UD -P A A O PUI W N W ~U1-N W vJ -~ NNA -~~JON~IO N W W o N N jvn N~1JP W P-UI-JA UI UTA ~INW N~I~P~1+UI +oW Vl WP W APUIN .O +O I )- lR to - -.1 -J -J N A O m~ W W A ~D N~ o P m N UI N .o .o W ~'N .O 0 o P +o .nI a tti N N A .OIUI -J - +o .O W W- P .p A P o VIA N N -~ A tti A -~ o VI P o P N .o ~I. J Ito - N ~-1N G~ O+N a o A A A-N+O ~IW ~IN.oAPap W o.O ~O U1 .0 P ASIA -1 ~ m - -- N I ~ -~ N N W r U1I U1 ~ ~~fJ A o-lJ fJ --JNNN P W -~ N W W NA Ul-~1 P N UI -J ~~D Op Jp 'W N- OC fL-IgNPA WU7o W ~.O A-~N-J UIO WoA~1P ICON W P~.o N N Iv~Ja to ~INP-- W oUI W-c+ oNOp~~ W W~1 ODAOO-+AOW PooPA~A - - c J: .7,tP W o fJ ~ ~1 (A o+ W o UI P o o .IIO +0 -~ A A N o 0 o P m~~l o o +O ~o W o -J N A N ~C'N UI OD L -1/D A o PP A W oU1 -`I~ A VI~AO)UI O-U)~+O~A W o~O -~ •-Jo +0 u~ a-~ Co,N 1'J WIW G+N-.O UI O.- W A oNm W-J OUlW00P~000IA 00 W UIN UI I l ~ I ~ I I - I I ~'o .a fJ WiIR W UI - -~ A A .p,W O UI,W A A WNW A P N NSW W A - ~W - o to U1 0 .n M~0 J) UI ~J -J +ON ~ -UI to CO N-1 0+ A ~J O .0 - fD -JI o ~ PIiOU-s• ~1N ~1-UII N .o of N +0 W w~.lAmroa -UINP ~1P A OPO A 171 -JNP - - W N W -~ o ~D O P O W AIW .0 OIO A P W Ul o N P o - - W ~I~N N ol-J - .O UI ~1• 1 1 W 1 C Ia I m I • I ~ 1 1 I 1 ."0 2 I • O 1 < 7 1 • A 1 7 7 1 C r 1 • ~< Iw I I I ~ I • 1 < -< I • -i ~ I 7 O I C ' a ~ I N 1 1 ci 1 ~ 1 W yI 1 ~ • I r I a 17 I n N I I • a 1 a I N -1 1 a (K I m O I G a' I n I.N 1 m .1 a I a I< I ~ O a I y 7 I C I a ~-4 J '11 C 2 I O .'D L O 7 O O S 0 IJI u oI 7 a a ~I G 7 GI o a ~ ~ T 3 r ~a i n I.~i a ~ r o 0 "11 C _ ~ om~ 2 N K -i ~ 2 «• O 9 -~ 1 nb D ~a O N n a 7 OIa O T~~ x a a o - aa -I,n Y m~ C y _- py m \ 7 W.N~- o a a .< .0 a `" I' C a O -O D a -i 61 rnm -o N o O \ O l~ J. `' ~' . :+:. . ~ --- - i - i> a ... .. I 7 I ~~ :~ `I i I I I I 1 I I ' i ' I I ' 1 I 1 ~' I I I I I j 1 ~ O G O O O;O O O O 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O N~./~ .U1 Ul UI!UI UI UI UI A A AAA W W W NNN ~-- W ~' jUl A AIW W RiIfU A W W N N W N W N N -~ W N- 0 0, ~o U1 oiUl o Ullo o U1 o UI o 0 0 o Ill 0 0 0 0 0 r ro' V ~.+~D in -0'3 Gl G~ m370 nTf <CSn m61f •-~ ('+'. ' O O 7 C C C N N a 7 a 0 O ~^ a ~+~ O O .- N N O' ~' j n C w I O' 'O O 7 7 '1 ~- 1 y 'J I n a C N 710 ^l >r; o I«. n ni... N •- ~+ o N a •-•~ 7 C o y• o ~ a ~ o n N «~ aw; In Iw s i..~.-w A ~+a 7~fn w o m N «.c -. - .f-fw ~ o I .- n t n .- n ~- o a N N N N o n a 7 o a 7 w o O a «• juJa~l>.,xx n -7ao .-ao l =N a n ~' x I N c .-. , w N N N v w o .- 7 .- 'o o• y ~. .- a o .- w .• N, N -7 N o~w 7 ala c n', o~ !<77'•-.n"-L• v N a ~v 7 n n Nv c v 7 w n nN c n •. +- 7~ N 7 < mTa ~ ~ ~ I ro .. n .. 7 7~ ~ «. N w n N N n w -1 a 7 I a: 7 ~ N •-~ i w ••1 n n x C a n O 7 « w D a 7 a r I , w n! 7 N .• N .f w .1 r~. M . .• Oi O '7;N O n a N P O 6Y P 1 ~ ~ -~ >< N 7 N w 1 7 < O . - i a Y Yi I JO N '1 N N '! -n 7 w K O a K '7 D I I a ••. ft 7 ~1 7 M d 9 I N I N a ti 9 n s I ' N 10 •- Jp .. ' ~ i ci n 7 a 7 -J ., .- n O O n w ~ 7 C O D 7 i i Y~ i 7 ~ G a i n 3 ~ -N! Ul i I-w .o - NNW - A W AP - UI VI 1 1 • I i UI- ~n - W IO .4 J` P - N OO W O o-~Ol W AfA A ~ oN I I 1 1 I N W. -J - N W to .0 Nj W to ' W UI ~o A N N W W UI - Vf N UI to N W I I U' P . fu .D~ 0 o A UIIW Ul • 1- I UI -J A Po ~o mr W .o U1 -JP P ,1P W I N ln' VI W o UI~N ~ W;P N P N /b A •0 -- W ,I o OD - N W -J A -~ o I i I ' I OO. W IW OOo N W: ~I -' P-J I~iP W W •.7 tnO W A OOD P ~P ~0 1 ~ Pw ~ ro.ao NPwl.n m oN ~.oA w Nlnul A Pfnw N .o~P i I I J+ I I W P -NN - o NNUI I w .0 lJ fJ w fU UI A -~ - o J UI W -1 A .0 W P; .o ~ P -) a -.. aT I w Iln fu - • -I .o .a o - of m N ~I .o .o P N A IW ~1 u A A' .: I - Iwc A w A.ooW o UI A WP .o I A(A ~I w i oOoA - Iti' -J N fU W W ~1 UI P ~! W o o OD ~O - +O P o N ~O A A •O j N J=; •a I o IP c, UI CA o ~1 A -• A ~.1 .o Oo .o UI Oo o Uli I o IN v AI I i ~ w - ,J A N I ' _ _ ~1 .0 W VI N P .D .o ln- ! A O A W O ~1 PAP P i P~ W W 1 io fu ~•J i - fv N Uo N N VI; W N •J o - o, N - o W fU G• iU I ; p. I O N W fU PI -' W ~ P -- - ~0 U1 U1 W P'', f U •A N 1 o Pi ~ -J N N W W~ N W •O P -J lb u7I I W N W a i I I '- I - wI ~ ---~ P -Nw ro - I UI iJ P A •u In I -~ C fc !n A -If f .0 u - -• o N ~ N -• o o A - N -- I I H) - t o - u ~l U 1•'J n. iA L1 -J P OJ OD Ul O~P N -J ~. Inc Ul N N o • J O - O P ~1 .O f - In In O' I I i • N P A P A o A A N A; I wfJ u~ '~C•fJ ~'/A" IO N P J P P- N -• OA o ~D W NI P PN~1 ++ ~ ~c• IJ Pi.ld ~- W ~ N W lJ -J A W A •0 ~o N N A o P - o N W' fu io -- c 1.. ul rD - I m I P UI fu w .J) In P P N A - P W P j ~1 I W W X01 I "' W i I fU UI 1 - Ni ~I -• N W W I W .~ r~ ' u, rJ ~ c• n~ J_ P -1 -- .o -+l o N N - N N ru U11 P u• fv I IP A -i In -- N~ ' P t U1, N P A; N to fJ A 41 N P' A A ~I N i In s. _-. c•in ln-J ~V NN c+ 0 01.0 W N, -- -•-~OD W A W P~ N INON. 111 fu ' ~ c. J Iii. N JJ'1J In l.l4 r .• N ~1 P -J WI W W ~I o lql fU N -J~ N LO - G, W I N - P ~1, ' N -~ t - ' - N ~O W I W In 7 . G~ L -1 l JIC - . ' ~l P UI -~ u1 •0 - ' 1. .O A Oj u a l• A ln, W ~.O N J Ul O - N .D P ~1 I A IUI W P' I .J w !lr l., ln!~ J ~J -.l ~ ~ln w wl I I I ' 1 I P .~ . o -J u~.' c• w a ~ - w A Al -- w w N w A J I 1 UI N N. I o ~ W I m N WI ~I N A! i io J,J v ~q ~1~~1 ul ulJ w .a.iP o A; o v N A o .0' lo• .u •o. ~o W i I ! 1 ~ o f fi J. -J oI N i ~ I I 1 I i I ~ i ( . ~ ~ I I 1 i i I I I I 1 I I fU ~',, A W .o. I I I i j I I -1 N A I o M W' ~ I 1 i I I I I N o P j I I I i I I I ; I I I I 1 0 1 i "~ `~ J l: C C G 7 N r C 7 a I ~D 3 I N O I 7 7 I n .+ 1 7 1 ~ 1 C K 1 ~ 1 N N Imo I 7 L I n ~+ I 1 C w I I S N t Iva 1 7 7 I a O. I'7 I In 7 N •O 1 m 1 x1 I P ~ I NI 1 -<m7 111 7 al Igo n 1 C ~+ t 3 C I O' 7 ! 1 N' nl C I 7 I 1 N I I 07 7 I I ja n I I ~- C ~ I'a a 117 v I.n N 1 N 7 ~ I N 1 n I I' I~ 11 a o-l-+ IIW w ,o 1 c m, I I4 a 7 ~rn 1 n I J. IIN :J C I~ 1 ~~ 91N 1'. O QI7 I~ ti ~G I I I I { I i11 O O x N ol-n Ni Im MIS 10 (nIN n n7o aka c r~«. 7 .~ n 31C ~[ i 21+i O 11w -~ x- I~m o j7 a a,n y~9 x o!v N 'n 7 - a 017 « aln -i.N ~ m w +O - .7- -a ~ 7 a W.Q o; \'D .o,v N b b i~ 'O N I I O N ~ I D y ~ 1 0 rn m 1 - o I fU O \ O - O I A - I ~ UI ~\ I I , I I ~ ~ I 1 I i^ I !~ r ;. ~~' Im A n 7 O n C ~ n L •< 7 A O w -~ a im o ,7 fu n 7 c o 3 >t c A 7 fu 7 c ~~ ~ w rfJ 7 Q, ~. 7 a In ! D V I~ ~~ ~4 ~'~ IO 7 IN I D ro a D y 6l mm o N o \ G ... O t. fH .U In _1 1 _ _ _ I '~ ' _ i.. O Oi G 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O v0 .01 ur vO .O ~.O ~O vO VO V b~O OmO ~ 'I 6J ~ 1 P O~! In V1NNA A W W N-•~ ANN ~ ! N •-~ In W NoNOV1o1111110 01!10 1 ~ --.I .,.•.cn~zz•-~~Dm vm~ o' ~ 7 7~ 7 7 7 o n a m r a c n o. ! •+ •+ < -1 d 7 ~.-a x w xv coo n ' -J o~ 7 ro ~ o ro m a ~ ® C ~ n r r• o .. 7 ~ o! ti .o: a -1 ~ .0 7 y v ... c w o a a ro o ao ~~ o 0 I -I .O m' -~ ~ o n 7 '1 7 C f0 7 N ~• •C - o n s~ S 1 o C C O O N O .n 7 fY " .- f7 A O ~ N r I a I 7 J 7 ~•• U ID w n .y ." d Y A 1 n -~ ! Ir -~ nn z •c -J7N-1 n7< ~ -~ ~- ' 71 ~ o UJ ..~n urma-~Amm o flrD< j I m v' •-1 -i 7 D m m -c c a ~• \ o~ ro H 7 Jo w I C 7' 7 7 1 n '1 ++ .~ r••• 7 m C 7 7 3 w< Z w i 0~ 4• ~ O fl < N m N ti a r- w w A G ~ rD m i 0 -n' 7 7 1 rp O r'~ n or O n 'tt 7 O ~• x a w w ~ ~ C fl .- m M~ 4 r r .•. -1 O ~+ I 7 '. -i -n! d 7 m fA W x n y fY •~ n .~ ~ rD j w' rorol ~ »wd7v7 7w •c dal G N UI ; 3 4~ N 7 0 0 y O ~•~ ~ ~' I I C A 7 n. 7 3 N W O N O ! U Ci » n 9 < 7 7 ~+ ~ C w d N ~ o ~ ~ '1 M 7 .T.. O ') ! T Q L O I w O W 9 10 ~ i I 7 n m m -t j fu 7 7 L I ~ ~ C "J 9 I I ~ N 7 0 ~ I O 7 O I 10 a fn N x O w 7 ~ I 7 70 ~n A n 7 d O 7 c a O < J ~1~ t+ UI J a O C ins .on ~ N .1 . ~ 1 a f « u Q f4 C 7 n .- 7 O f f 7 G •• w 1 ~ 7 ~ C aoa a r 7 N t N N < _ r- B C O 7 I r0 7 W C ~o J l C 7 C c 6 rt DIY .'9 A O .r D 0 2 m N vp ' vU L' L. I •7 o, iP lp J! P fU .. ~. A 1 i I m w.. o J- ^I!' t fu A -• -~ N A -~ D ~o W P 1J1 0 - ~. I C I fU iN .= L off - G•o o -G+NO OA T •J O. ^1P P O W N I d 'fl lJl itn In , -c~; o• o Lo oJPNUI -L m o -NN o ODN W 1 L o~ -J N fu UI .O o o O. o o - .O P N - -J Ul -1 UI N to 1 ~ 6 I - -•I -J ~: -J •-0! - -• G~ O OA OO r0O W o .OPN N N-' ~ 1 ~l ,~ N -J rn' ~ y W o 0 0 0 0 ~1 N A o N ~o W o T W N I I ~ u m l i I x .,1 I N y! y i I = ~ i 1 A o . ' lJl j In W ~.. - - J I J W In - 1 I 7 7 n ~ N A fU fU I N; - O W W CU - N + N 1 I. N I. o' . I 1.1 I - N P Oo _ OD -- UI _ N Oo o A O• .0 1 1 ~•• 7 .. - a r •i W o -JI a om D~ N -1 W NGO' o ma. I C•c 1 t I A o' - C0~ A VI ~ vo O O. -~ N m W vDt I/1 O- 1 7 T fu I N - lrl 4~'! W UI .O A N OD - OD o A UI DI P o W I N O w Z I i ( i I ~ I I mo 2 1 7 c I ~ I n » 1 I N ' N ~ I ' I c w a ~O I 1 I _ I B A a 1 1 7 7 j I lrl 1 Ul V7 I UI W o W .. I Y n O ' r ~L ' o !o I I A o WI o ~ 1 7 «- I T o -J y m .o' c UI I n 7 ! I ~ j Joo 0 ~ i I I 1 m l a iro -' ~ ; 1 x -1 ~ ~;J I~ -. r.J b. P A I ,I A N, v 1 -C m 7 l ... ~ ~ ' N 1. ' N ' J= W' lJ -• - !rl J1, -- rA fJ A - N ~ fJ L I Wi d D - ,I N .~ N N O• - N UI -1 A - W ~ W ~I N UI fU -` 1 1 --1 7 nj D n ~-~ •.• \ I 'I : 1- ~ ~ ', u J iu' -J J iJ~ - ln O c UI fu o ~. m fV fU UI N N fU o+ UI Co o N W N 0o N A P .o N- -d Vl o of I 1 1 C A ~ H C V ~ I W o \ - 1 !qp iV . Vl -1' G l o O C o o N N c rJl O N d a - O W I _ ry b ! i I I I ~ w UI ~ ~ !. G• t•J l l~ i I C I 7 I W I U. W -J'. rn ~ I - N I A ~ ._ ~- v ..• .i n ` -J I .:U J- - -- N A I - g ~1 CA O• I - ~W ' 1 W ~ ' 1 d (1 o ' - v - -• f Oi •a (c -~ C• O ~ fi N W UI N W t ~i 1 W ~ 1 .F I -~ ~ ~ ~ I 1 ~-• C L ~ ~r W ~ fu c Ai o -- o. a U1 - W -1 ~1 J In N W, -J I w o 1 fu g •.[J -J «! fV ' Ul fu ~~ 0 0 o G O NI T O. o W vo A N o I N -~ W~. I I n A 1.1 W J O• VI - c - c, o fU of A o d -~ •J N vo -, A ~J' ' fU -J -• O' I i rD 7 u ~ .L ~J I'U -! in c -J 1.1 0 0 O~ o o .O A .O -J Ai ~ P UI to i 111 W O) I 1 ' I I ~ n I I I i I i , I~ ~ ~ ~ I W 4. -i I , ~ I I m w , D ~ I ~ I I c m; I ' - ~ - I rc~ - c ! - ~ N. ~ fU' I U1 A l.ll (U ,1 N w' o W .o: i ~o 0o Js I O N ~I i I I ~ ~ n i x m N C~ I rl '. I.J !~l i G~ c: O O OI o O W - A L W 40 rp M ~1 Uoi 1 ~ O V7 i I fJ I i I ~ ; ~ ~ ~ -• l'Ji ~ I I I O Ulo000O O-~ i i vOO i ~ •J OP; O+O Wi I i '1 Ia i II IIII' ~ _I ~i _. __ 1 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER T" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 9, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Update on Upgrading the Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant and Major Interceptor Lines COUNTY ADMINISTRATORS COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' On November 1, 1994 Roanoke County, along with the other valley governments signed a revised wastewater treatment contract. This contract calls for a major upgrade of the regional wastewater treatment facility and the Roanoke River and Tinker Creek Interceptors. The estimated cost of this project (using 1993 dollars) was approximately 41 million dollars, with the County share of $12.5 million. New revised estimates are included in this report. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: As design of the project proceeded the localities began meeting on a quarterly basis to review progress. The last such meeting was held November 9, 1995. A brief summary of the various projects is as follows: • ROANOKE RIVER INTERCEPTOR/TINKER CREEK INTERCEPTOR - The design of these projects is approximately 80$ complete. All topographic mapping and surveys of existing utilities is complete. - The city staff began meeting with regulatory agencies in December to begin obtaining the necessary approvals. The process is expected to take 180 days. - The preliminary environmental review is complete. No wetlands are included in the project areas and the proposed alignment avoids most known problem areas. - The project will require that easements be acquired '~ 5 from approximately 70 parcels of land on the Roanoke River Project and 7 to 12 parcels on the Tinker Creek Project in addition to acquiring easements from Norfolk Southern. The city plans to begin easement acquisition in the first quarter of 1996. - It is presently anticipated that construction can begin late in the 2nd quarter of 1996 on both projects. The Tinker Creek project should be complete by March 1997 and the Roanoke River Project by January 1998. - The project budget on the Roanoke River Project portion has increased from $17,807.295 to $23,542,247 (County share: $6,968,505). The project budget on the Tinker Creek Project has increased from $4,631,893 to $6,320,409 (County share: $2,079,415). The budget was increased to allow for approximately 5 percent annual inflation from 1993 to 1997 plus anticipated construction difficulties (such as the alignment shifts that were required to miss suspected environmental problems). • WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT - The design of the plant upgrade is underway using alternative technology. The design will utilize the non-conventional Biological Aerated Filter (BAF) technology, as opposed to conventional aeration basin. This design is more economical and requires much less space. The biological filter is proposed to be added to a side stream flow. That is, take a certain portion of the flow coming in and treat it through this process. The side stream flow to be treated will be constant and flow variation due to rain will be treated by the existing facility. The flow from the biological filter will be blended with the regular flow at the end of the plant for disinfection. - It is presently anticipated that construction will be complete by early 1998. - The project budget for the plant remains at $19,070,813. It is hoped that cost savings realized through the new technology will offset construction cost increases since 1993. The contract for the project was not signed until 1994 and preliminary engineering began immediately after that. FISCAL IMPACT• The County of Roanoke has received approval for funding from the Virginia Revolving Loan Fund of $13,100,000 at 4.75 interest for twenty (20) years, subject to the receipt of federal funding. This federal funding is part of the federal budget that is currently at a standstill. Staff has had several meetings with representatives from the Revolving Loan Fund program and we currently believe the loan may 2be closed in two parts, to allow us more flexibility in the cost estimates. The first closing would be in the summer of 1996 after the bids are received for construction of the interceptors. The second closing would be at the point when construction bids are received on the wastewater treatment plant. The $13,100,000 can be adjusted upward at that time to the amount that is needed to complete the project. The sewer rates have already been increased to pay for the anticipated debt service on the $13,100,000 loan. The anticipated interest rate was very close to the approved rate, however the delay in the design (and therefore the borrowing) will allow the County to accumulate approximately $1,000,000 annually, beginning with the 1995-96 fiscal year, until the debt service begins. This money can be used to pay as much as possible of the County's share of the cost increases in lieu of increasing the borrowing. This money will also be used to pay any disallowed costs for the Revolving Loan program, such as easement acquisition. Based upon the revised estimates outlined above, the County's revised cost estimate would be as follows: Roanoke River Interceptor (29.6% share) $ 6,968,505 Tinker Creek Interceptor (32.9% share) 2,079,415 Wastewater Treatment Plant (29.2% share) 5,568,677 Roanoke County Revised Share X14,616,597 SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: ~~~ ~~~ Gary R ertson, P.E. Elmer C. Hodge Utility Director County Administrator Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Harrison Johnson Minnix Nickens ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: January 9, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Joint Work Session with the Roanoke Valley Area Metropolitan Planning Organization COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This time has been set aside for the Board of Supervisors to meet with the Roanoke Valley Area Metropolitan Planning Organization. We will discuss issues related to regional transportation planning including bikeway and greenway plans. Submited by: ~: ;- ~~~' ~ ~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Harrison Referred ( ) Johnson To ( ) Minnix Nickens 1 s AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON JANUARY 9, 1996 RESOLUTION CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. CONFIDENTIAL MEMO To: Board of Supervisory A~~ From: Paul M. Mahoney ` ~Y' Subject: City-status (continued) Date: January 4, 1996 This memorandum is submitted to you within the range of the attorney-client privilege, and as such, is confidential. Further, it is exempt from disclosure as a public record under the provisions of the Virginia Freedom of Information Act, Section 2.1-342.B.5. In addition to the previous information concerning city-status which I have given to you, there are two further issues for your consideration. Section 15.1-1032.2 contains the annexation moratorium provisions. Beginning January 1, 1987 and terminating July 1, 1997, no city shall file against any county an annexation notice with the Commission on Local Government, and no city shall institute an annexation court action against any county. During the same period, "no city charter shall be granted or come into force and no suit or notice shall be filed to secure a city charter." Unfortunately this provision will prevent the County from proceeding with city status until the expiration of the moratorium. Opponents ofcity-status will raise the fear of uncontrollable local debt. Article VII, Section 10 of the Constitution of Virginia provides that no city or town shall incur any general obligation indebtedness exceeding 10% of the assessed value of the real estate in the city or town (subject to certain limited exceptions). In contrast, counties are limited in their ability to incur general obligation debt only after approval by the qualified voters (subject to certain limitations and exceptions). Roanoke County's current general obligation debt is less than 1.82% of the assessed valuation of real estate in the County. Some opponents would suggest that the new city council (board of supervisors) of the new Roanoke County-City would irresponsibly incur debt up to this 10% limit, with no opportunity for the voters to control such profligate spending. It may be necessary to address this debt creation issue during the city-status discussions and to allay these unfounded fears. PMM/spb cc: Elmer C. Hodge CONFIDENTIAL MEMO To: Board of Superviso ~~yy4 From: Paul M. Mahoney 1~ Subject: Additions to the 1996 Legislative Program Date: January 4, 1996 This memorandum is submitted to you within the range of the attorney-client privilege, and as such, is confidential. Further, it is exempt from disclosure as a public record under the provisions of the Virginia Freedom of Information Act, Section 2.1-342.B.5. Based upon the decision of the Board on January 2, 1996, to delete the reference to towns in the proposed Charter amendment, it is my recommendation that the Board not pursue the proposed general law amendments which were on the agenda for January 2, 1996, and which were deferred to your agenda for January 9, 1996. Roanoke County already enjoys immunity from city-initiated annexations. This proposed legislation would not provide any additional protections to Roanoke County. Previously the Board expressed to me its concerns with respect to the Urban Partnership proposals which would allow a city with a population not exceeding 125,000 to revert to a status similar to that enjoyed by a town. Since a reverted city would enjoy all of the powers of a town, excluding towns from the proposed Charter amendment and from proposed general legislation amendments would leave Roanoke County vulnerable to reverted city/town annexations. If the Board desires to proceed with this initiative, it is my suggestion that we wait until legislation, if any, is introduced to implement the earlier Urban Partnership recommendations concerning local government structure and processes. At that time we could request legislative action in response to those proposals. PMM/spb cc: Elmer C. Hodge ~o~ aoaNO,~~ 2 a 1838 MARY H. ALLEN. CMC CLERK TO THE BOARD P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2005 rAX (703) 772-2193 January 11, 1996 The Honorable The Honorable The Honorable The Honorable The Honorable The Honorable John S. Edwards Malfourd W. "Bo" Trumbo H. Morgan Griffith C. Richard Cranwell Clifton A. Woodrum A. Victor Thomas BRENDA J. HOLTON DEPUTY CLERK Dear Senators Edwards, Trumbo and Congressmen Griffith, Cranwell, Woodrum, and Thomas: Attached is an attested copy of Resolution No. 010996-7 in support of the legislative initiative of the City of Roanoke to create a Regional Transportation District Commission. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, January 9, 1996. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ~• Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Attachment cc: Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Carolyn S. Ross, Clerk, Vinton Town Council Forest Jones, Clerk, Salem City Council Mary F. Parker, Clerk, Roanoke City Council ® P~ CONFIDENTIAL MEMO To: Board of Supervisors ,1 ~~ From: Paul M. Mahoney ~ `~ ~ Subject: City-status (continued) Date: January 4, 1996 This memorandum is submitted to you within the range of the attorney-client privilege, and as such, is confidential. Further, it is exempt from disclosure as a public record under the provisions of the Virginia Freedom of Information Act, Section 2.1-342.B.5. In addition to the previous information concerning city-status which I have given to you, there are two further issues for your consideration. Section 15.1-1032.2 contains the annexation moratorium provisions. Beginning January 1, 1987 and terminating July 1, 1997, no city shall file against any county an annexation notice with the Commission on Local Government, and no city shall institute an annexation court action against any county. During the same period, "no city charter shall be granted or come into force and no suit or notice shall be filed to secure a city charter." Unfortunately this provision will prevent the County from proceeding with city status until the expiration of the moratorium. Opponents ofcity-status will raise the fear of uncontrollable local debt. Article VII, Section 10 of the Constitution of Virginia provides that no city or town shall incur any general obligation indebtedness exceeding 10% of the assessed value of the real estate in the city or town (subject to certain limited exceptions). In contrast, counties are limited in their ability to incur general obligation debt only after approval by the qualified voters (subject to certain limitations and exceptions). Roanoke County's current general obligation debt is less than 1.82% of the assessed valuation of real estate in the County. Some opponents would suggest that the new city council (board of supervisors) of the new Roanoke County-City would irresponsibly incur debt up to this 10% limit, with no opportunity for the voters to control such profligate spending. It may be necessary to address this debt creation issue during the city-status discussions and to allay these unfounded fears. PMM/spb cc: Elmer C. Hodge CONFIDENTIAL MEMO To: Board of Superviso 1/ From: Paul M. Mahoney "~J~~V~ Subject: Additions to the 1996 Legislative Program Date: January 4, 1996 This memorandum is submitted to you within the range of the attorney-client privilege, and as such, is confidential. Further, it is exempt from disclosure as a public record under the provisions of the Virginia Freedom of Information Act, Section 2.1-342.B.5. Based upon the decision of the Board on January 2, 1996, to delete the reference to towns in the proposed Charter amendment, it is my recommendation that the Board not pursue the proposed general law amendments which were on the agenda for January 2, 1996, and which were deferred to your agenda for January 9, 1996. Roanoke County already enjoys immunity from city-initiated annexations. This proposed legislation would not provide any additional protections to Roanoke County. Previously the Board expressed to me its concerns with respect to the Urban Partnership proposals which would allow a city with a population not exceeding 125,000 to revert to a status similar to that enjoyed by a town. Since a reverted city would enjoy all of the powers of a town, excluding towns from the proposed Charter amendment and from proposed general legislation amendments would leave Roanoke County vulnerable to reverted city/town annexations. If the Board desires to proceed with this initiative, it is my suggestion that we wait until legislation, if any, is introduced to implement the earlier Urban Partnership recommendations concerning local government structure and processes. At that time we could request legislative action in response to those proposals. PMM/spb cc: Elmer C. Hodge President William H.H. Blcvins Smyth County President-Elect Harper R. Wagner Bath County First Vice Prt;cident Katherine K. Hanley Fairfax County Second Vice President John D. Jenkins [ since William County Secretary-Treasurer E. Virgil Sampson Jr. Scott County Innnedinte Pnst President Peggy R Wiley Grecnsville County Region 1 Gregory L. Duncan Accomack County Kegion 2 Marion B. Williams Prince George County Region 3 Rudolph V. Jones Charles City County John A. Waldrop Jr. Henrico County Arthur S. Warren Chesterfield County Region 4 John J. Purcell Jr. Louisa County Kegion 5 Charles W. Curry Augusta County Region 6 W. Harrington Smith Jr. Frederick County Region 7 Ferris M. Bclman Sr. Stafford County Wayne A. Acors Caroline County Rr~yion 8 Hilda M. Barg Prince William County William J. Bcckcr Prince William County F:mest J. Berger Fairfax County Robert 6. Dix Jr. Fairfax County Michael R. Frey Fairfax County Gerald W. Hyland lairfax Cormty Mary Margaret Whipple Arlington County Region 9 Wanda C. Wingo &rietourt County RPgiOn 1~ J. Michael Davidson Campbell County Mason A. Vaughan Sr. Pulaski County Region ll M. Jay Hubble Smyth County Rrginu 72 James H. Gibson Lcc County Past Presidrnfs Harry G. Daniel Chesterfield Qwnty Kathleen K. Seefcldt Prince William County W.ll. Gray Richmond County Executive Director James D. Campbell, CAP ® General Gnmsel C. Flippo Hicks VIRGINIA ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES 1001 East Broad Street ~ Suite LL 20 Richmond, Virginia 23219-1928 (804) 788-6652 fax (804) 788-0083 M•E•M•O•R•A•N~~?~V•M TO: Chairman of the Board, Roanoke County FROM: Barbara Paige DATE: December 1, 1995 I have enclosed a certificate for Bob L. Johnson. The certificate was available at our recent Annual Conference but was not picked up at the registration desk. Please present this certificate to Mr. Johnson. Thank you. /\~~ UISiR/CT . ~~~ ~'~~ { "~ FIFTN PLANNING DISTf~ICT COMMISSION ~ ~;;~ ~ ' ~- 313 Luck Avenue, SW ~~'~ ~ ~ Post Office E3ox 2569 y ~U---= Roanoke, Virginia 2~F010 ~~'~"~ °`°"~"`~~~ (:i40) 343-4417 • fax (540) 343-4416 December 19, 1995 MEMORANDUM TO: City/Town Managers and County Administrators in the Fifth Planning District FROM: Wayne G. Strickland, Executive Director At its December 14 meeting, the Fifth Planning District Commission adopted a resolution in support of the location of the Blue Ridge Visitors Center on the Roanoke River Parkway. I have enclosed a copy of that resolution and hope that your governing body will consider adopting a similar resolution of support. Please call me if you have any questions. WGS:jIp i Enclosure ~, ~~.,, ! `, ,, ;° ~~ ~~ ° ~ ~, ~,~ Serving Alleghany County, Botetourt County; Clifton Forge, Covington, Craig County, Roanoke City, Roanoke County, Salem, and the Town of Vinton ,^ _~. N= FIFT}~ PLANNING DISTRICT COMMI SSION l " _;_ ~ ~ 313 Luck Avenue, SW ~ Post Office Box 2569 .ice ~`~ °~~ Roanoke, Virginia 24010 ~~" "'~'~~ (S40) 3=13-4-117 ~~ fax (540) 343-4416 The 14th day of December, 1995 RESOLUTION In Support of the Location of the Blue Ridge Visitors Center on the Roanoke River Parkway WHEREAS, the local governments and groups interested in promoting economic development and tourism in the Roanoke Valley have long endorsed the construction of a major tourist visitor information center adjacent to the Blue Ridge Parkway between the parkway's intersections with U.S. 220 and State Route 24; and WHEREAS, the National Park Service's planning and environmental impact assessment process associated with construction of the Roanoke River Parkway included detailed consideration of alternative locations for such a visitors center and resulted in the identification of the "best" two sites for this purpose, one on private property on the north side of the Roanoke River east of the parkway near the Roanoke River bridge and the other on public land on the south side of the river (on former regional landfill property); and WHEREAS, the evolution of the plans for the Roanoke River Parkway results in a change in the new parkway's final location from the north side. of the river to the south. side of the river, leaving the privately-oum_ed visitor center site on the north side of the river inaccessible without the construction of another road connection to the Blue Ridge Parkway, while the publicly-owned visitors center site on the south side of the river will be easily accessed as soon as construction of the Roanoke River Parkway, now under construction, is completed; and WHEREAS, an ad hoc committee comprised of representatives of the National Park Service, Roanoke County, the City of Roanoke, the City of Salem, the Town of Vinton, the Roanoke Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau, the Fifth Planning District Commission, Friends of the Blue Ridge Parkway, the Virginia Division of Tourism, and Explore Park recently concluded that the. Blue Ridge Visitors Center should be built on the site on the south side of the river adjacent to the Roanoke River Parkway. Serving Alleghany County, Botetourt Ccunty, Clifton Forge, Covington, Craib County, Roanoke City, Roanoke County, Salem, and the Town of Vinton .1 . } RESOLUTION (Cont'd) Page -2- follows: THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Fifth Planning District Commission as 1. That the Fifth Planning District Commission endorses the committee's recommendation for construction of the Blue Ridge Visitors Center on the Roanoke River Parkway, and supports prompt construction of this visitors center at this site; and 2. That the Executive Director of the Commission transmit this resolution to the members of the United States Congress who represent the P1arLning District together with a cover letter acknowledging that the cost of building and operating such a center will be the joint responsibility of the federal government and local entities; and 3. That the Executive Director forward copies of this resolution to governing bodies within the District requesting that they adopt a similar resolution; and 4. That the Fifth Planning District Commission supports provision of interim visitor center services in a building eventually destined for another use within Virginia's Explore Park. ATTEST: J. Lee E. Osborne Chairman i r o~ ROANp,~.~ ~. p z ° a 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (703) 772-2004 December 15, 1995 (~o~~tx~#~ v~ ~o~t~a~e P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (703) 772-2193 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS H. ODELL "FUZZY" MIN NIX, CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. KOHIN KE, SR., VICE-CHAIRMAN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B EDDY bViNDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VIN TO`~ MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (7031 772-2005 James C. Sears, Ed.D., Chairman Roanoke County Visioning Steering Committee 6026 Cavalier Drive, S. W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 ir'°" Dear Dr ears: I appreciate your sending me a copy o memorandum to the other Committee members. summation of the challenge undertaken by these enormous expenditure of time required. f your December 1 It is a skillful volunteers and the It would be impossible to over estimate the value of the work done by the Committee, and I know that you, as Chairman, kept up the momentum and had a significant impact on the entire process. I look forward to seeing you at the Board of Supervisors meeting on January 9. It will be a pleasure to see the Visioning Steering Committee and its Chairman get the recognition that they so richly deserve. Best wishes for a happy holiday season. Very truly yours, LS~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator meh cc - Ms. Mary H. Allen, Clerk Board of Supervisors ® RecyGed Paper ROANp~. O~ F ti ~ p ~ z a 1838 TO: FROM DATE: DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING MEMORANDUM Members of the Roanoke Committee James C. Sears, Chairman December 1, 1995 The Changing Century Roanoke County 200 County Visioning Steering Approximately nine months ago we met for the first time as a group, each possessing a different background, with one common purpose -- working to improve the future of Roanoke County. Work, we did. Discuss and debate, we did. Listen, we did. Care, we did. Produce, we did. Joining us in our efforts to develop the Vision for Roanoke County 2010 were three hundred other County citizens, a dozen or so citizens from neighboring communities, and the Roanoke County staff. This does not include our families who sacrificed many evening and weekend hours while we, along with others, carefully developed ideas that will have a profound impact on our County and region for years to come. Now comes the time for us to proudly and faithfully pass the Vision on, trusting that it will be carefully nurtured and developed as the months and years pass. We have been assured that the Vision will be the foundation for the 1996 Comprehensive Plan and the Capital Improvement Program. This pledge presents an opportunity for continued involvement with the County's planning process. Talking with Janet will likely find you a place in future planning efforts. The last meeting of the Steering Committee will be on Tuesday, January 9, 1996 at which time a certificate of appreciation will be presented to each of us by the Board of Supervisors. In practical terms, our job is now complete. With the deepest sincerity, I thank you for your efforts and for your support. I have gained enormously from you and from our process. I know you join me in thanking Janet Scheid for her significant contribution to this effort, and to other members of the County staff who, along with Janet, so generously gave of their time and talent. I wish you a Happy Holiday Season and a Wonderful New Year. cc: Janet Scheid Elmer Hodge P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24018-0798 1703) 772-2068 FAX: (703) 772-2108 ® Recycled Paper ~ - /J~ ~ , LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 3 p.m. on Tuesday, January 9, 1996, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, for two Intermodal Surface Transportation Enhancement Act (ISTEA) grant applications: 1) submitted by the Hanging Rock Battlefield and Railway Preservation Foundation for the Hanging Rock Battlefield Trail, Phase II, Catawba Magisterial District; 2) submitted by the Roanoke County Planning Department, Hollins Magisterial District, for the Landscape and Streetscape Enhancement of five locations within Roanoke County, three of which are adjacent to Botetourt County. Dated: December 22, 1995 Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times Tuesday, December 26, 1995 Tuesday, January 2, 1996 Direct the bill for publication to: Roanoke County Planning Department PO Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (540) 772-2068 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018