Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2/27/1996 - Regularti a a ~- -. C~mxntt~ of ~..u~xxwr~.~e WORKING DOCUMENT -SUBJECT TO REVISION ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION AGENDA February 27, 1996 Kw-sr+~rr~es~. Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement in orrier to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings or other programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County, please contact the Clerk to the Board at (70.?) 772-2005 We request that you provide at least 48- hours notice so that proper arrangements may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. ALL PRESENT AT 3:00 P.M. 2. Invocation: Rev. Samuel Crews Coopers Cove Baptist Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE i ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS PMM ADDED ITEM TO EXE SESS (3) DISCUSS ACOUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY FROM DAVID AND CONSTANCE SHELOR FOR PUBLIC UTILITY AND EMERGENCY COINIlVIUNICATIONS CHAIR ANNOUNCED THAT MEETING WILL BE AD TOURNED TO MARCH 4, 1996 FOR JOINT MEETING WITH CITY OF ROANOKE C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS NONE D. BRIEFINGS 1. Report from Roanoke Partnership on activities Executive Director) Valley Economic Development during 1995. (Beth Doughty, PRESENTED BY BETH DOUGHTY E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request for consideration of projects for 1996/97 Virginia Department of Transportation Revenue Sharing Program. (George Simpson, Assistant Director of Engineering & Inspections) A-022796-1 BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE PROTECTS AYES: FM, FFH, HCN, BI;I NAYS: LBE 2 2. Request from .The New Century Council to become a Partner in the organization and nominate individuals to serve on the Vision Committees. (Elmer Hodge, County Administrator) A-022796-2 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE PARTICIPATION AS PARTNER AND BOARD TO OFFER NOMINEES FOR SUBCO1bIlVIITTEES BY THE 3112/96 MEE1'IlVG URC 3. Resolution approving the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Budget for Fiscal Year 1996/97. (Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance) R-022796-3 FM MOTION TO APPROVE RESO URC 4. Request for approval to continue Roanoke County's share of cost allocation at 25% for the Roanoke County- Botetourt County Joint Library for Fiscal Years 1996/97 through 2000/2001. (Spencer Watts, Director of Libraries) A-022796-4 BL,J MOTION TO APPROVE CONTINUING COST ALLOCATION URC F. OLD BUSINESS NONE G. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS NONE 3 H. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS NONE I. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA FM MOTION TO APPROVE FIRST READING AND SET PUBLIC HEARINGS FOR 3/26/96 - URC 1. Ordinance to rezone 315+ acres from R-1, AG-1, and AR to PRD, planned residential development to construct residential homes and commercial services, located on Cotton Hill Road, east and west of the Blue Ridge Parkway, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Boone, Boone & Loeb, Inc. FFH REQUESTED THAT STAFF PROVIDE HIM WITH A COPY OF INFORMATION PREVIOUSLY GIVEN TO THE BOARD IN 1995 CONCERNING THIS SUBDIVISION 2. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to expand the existing church and school facilities, located on Williamson Road across from Brookside Shopping Center, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Shenandoah Baptist Church. LBE REQUESTED THAT INFORMATION SUBNIITTED FOR SECOND READING HAVE LARGER DRAWINGS AND GREATER DETAIL ABOUT REQUEST. 3. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to expand an existing manufactured home park, located at 5188 Yellow Mountain Road, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of Mountain Investors Corp. J. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 4 NONE K. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizing the acquisition of easements to construct the Carvins Creek Sewer Interceptor and the Glenvar East Sewer Main. (Gary Robertson, Utility Director) 0-022796-5 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE ORD URC L. APPOINTMENTS 1. Blue Ridge Community Services 2. Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals HCN REQUESTED THAT CLERK CONTACT MR. THOMAS DARNALL TO DETERMINE HIS WILLINGNESS TO SERVE ANOTHER TERM. 3. Highway and Transportation Safety Commission M. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WII.L BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WII.L BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. R-022796-6 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE RESO 5 URC 1. Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the League of Older Americans -Advisory Council. A-022786-6.a 2. Approval of Raffle Permit for Child Abuse Prevention Council of Roanoke Valley, Inc. A-022796-6.b 3. Donation of storm drainage, sanitary sewer, and waterline easements in connection with the development of Harris Teeter at the intersection of Brambleton Avenue and Colonial Avenue by R. S. Dickson & Company, d/b/a Ruddick Investment Company. A-022796- .c 4. Donation of existing pump station lot and related access easement in Section 1 of The Gardens of Cotton Hill from Strauss Construction Corporation. A-022796-6.d N. REPORTS AND INQUIItIES OF BOARD MEMBERS Supervisor Harrison: (1) Reported on meeting at Glenvar High School concerning rezoning in West County, and advised there will be another meeting with community, staff and VDOT to address concerns. Supervisor Nickens: ~1) Thanked PMM for providing information about Value Engineering from state and advised that the proposed CSHS will be subject to this. (2) Suggested public disclosure of tax rate indebtedness and tax rates to better educate County citizens about the position of Roanoke County's rates as compared with the other rates in the state. He asked for a reply from staff to the comments contained in the press release from Concerned Citizens for Good Government. BI.~T agreed 6 that the record should be set straight. ECH will get this information and distribute. Supervisor Eddy: 1) Asked for response on memo that ECH wrote concerning letter from Pittsylvania County asking for sgpport for General Assembly formula lottery proceeds. LBE has mixed feelings and FM suggested caution. (2) Thought article in RT recently about VA Tech farm in Catawba Valley was fine, and asked staff to prepare a report on ways to preserve site for non-commercial purposes. Consensus of Board that ECH prepare report. (3) Asked about meeting set up by Bob Herbert, Roanoke City Manager, to ask for help with Sports Complex near Victory Stadium. ECH advised that he will attend and bring back report~(4) Advised that DDH wrote memo to MIS asking for change in utility billing and he does not agree with threatening disconnection after only one monthly payment is missed. He felt this change should have been approved by the Board. There was a discussion concerning penalties and monthly reading of meters. ECH advised that the pilot project with AEP for monthly reading of meters is in progress and he will report on the final plans soon. (5) Asked about status of Cox Cable paying BPOL tax and ECH advised that a report will be made on 3/12/96. Supervisor Minnix: (1) Agrees with LBE's concern about threatening statements on utility bills. DDH and ECH advised that the wording will be changed. (2) Has received complaints concerning citizens walking dogs on leashes but allowing the dogs to damage or destroy other citizens' property and described the penalties for these offenses. Supervisor Johnson: (1) Recognized Keith Cook, Director of Human Resources, and advised that Mr. Cook will be retiring soon. (2) Advised that he attended the Burlington Elementary School PTA meeting with school administration staff to discuss the bond referendum. Advised of his commitment to address issues through value engineering, design phases, and creative financing and without a tax increase. FM pointed out that no member of the Board wants a tax increase. O. CITIZENS' COMII~NTS AND CONiMU1vICATIONS NONE P. REPORTS HCN MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE REPORTS- UW 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investments and Portfolio Policy, as of January 31, 1996 5. Statement of Estimated Revenues and Expenditures as of January 31, 1996 6. Bond Project Status Report Q. WORK SESSION 1. Discussion of the following budget issues: (a) Debt Policy; (b) CIP Draft; (c) Vehicle Inventory; (d) Year-end estimated expenditures and revenues; (e) Rollovers; (f) Update on BPOL Tax. WORK SESSION BEGAN AT 4:20 P.M. 1. BRENT ROBERTSON UPDATED THE BOARD ON THE YEAR- END ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES AND REVENUES. 2. WAYNE COMP'rON AND PAUL MAHONEY UPDATED THE BOARD ON BPOL TAX. 3. BILL RAND PRESENTED THE VEHICLE POLICY AND IT WAS THE CONSENSUS OF THE BOARD THAT 411 AND NOT 420 IS THE NUMBER OF VEHICLES OFFICIALLY AUTHORIZED. STAFF WILL RECONCILE THE COUNT AND REPORT BACK. 4. DIANE HYATT PRESENTED THE PROPOSED DEBT POLICY. IT 8 WAS THE CONSENSUS OF THE BOARD THAT STAFF MOVE FORWARD WITH THE POLICY, CONTACT OTHER STATES FOR INPUT, AND RETURN FOR BOARD AUTHORIZATION IN 1VINETY DAYS. IT WAS THE CONSENSUS OF THE BOARD THAT THE WORK SESSION BE COMPLETED AFTER THE EVENING SESSION R EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (5) discussion of prospective business or industry; (3) discuss acquisition of real property from David W. Shelor and Constance R. Shelor for public utility purposes and emergency communications; and (3) discuss acquisition of real property as it relates to the proposed new Cave Spring High School. AT 4:15 P.M., HCN MOTION TO GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION FOLLOWING THE WORK SESSION URC S. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION R-022796-7 AT 7:00 P.M., HCN MOTION TO RETURN TO OPEN SESSION AND ADOPT CERTIFICATION RESO - URC EVENING SESSION CHAIR RECOGNIZED LEADER AND MEMBERS OF BOY SCOUT TROOP #236, WINDSOR HILLS METHODIST CHURCH T. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 9 1. Resolutions of Appreciation to John Molumphy and Larry Miles, Fire & Rescue volunteers, for over 25 years of service to Roanoke County R-022796-8 BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE RESOLUTION URC MR. MOLUMPHY WAS PRESENT TO ACCEPT RESO AND PLAQUE U. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Public Hearing for citizens comments regarding the budget for Fiscal Year 1996-97. (Brent Robertson, Budget Manager) NO CITIZENS SPOKE 2. Public Hearing and Resolution adopting the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary Road Six Year Construction Plan for Fiscal Year 1996-2002, and allocation of funds for Fiscal Year 1996-97. (George Simpson, Assistant Director of Engineering & Inspections) R-022796-9 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE RESO URC ONE CITIZEN PRESENTED PETITION ASKING FOR COMPLETION OF BRIDGE, LOST MOUNTAIN ROAD AND TWELVE O'CLOCK KNOB V. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to construct a religious assembly facility, located at the intersection of Route 11 and State Route 777, Catawba Magisterial io District, upon the petition o Pentecostal Holiness Church. of Planning & Zoning) 0-022796-10 FFH MOTION TO APPROVE ORD URC f Christian Life Fellowship (Terry Harrington, Director 2. Ordinance to rezone 1.448 acres from I-1 conditional to I- 1 to permit light industrial use, located at 6152 Twine Hollow Road, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Robert and I.R. Stverak. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 0-022796-11 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE ORD URC ED NATT, ATTORNEY FOR PETITIONERS, SPOKE 3. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to allow a dental laboratory at 2121 Electric Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the petition of Dental Prosthetics Inc. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 0-022796-12 LBE MOTION TO APPROVE ORD AND INCLUDE CONDITION TO LINIIT THE AREA OF THE DENTAL LAB TO 1700 FEET URC 4. Ordinance to rezone 1.40 acres from C-2C to I-2C with conditions to permit a contractors storage yard at 2032 Hardy Road, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of Bedford Continuous Guttering Inc. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 0-022796-13 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE ORD ii URc 5. Ordinance amending and reenacting Ordinance 82592-12, The Zoning Ordinance by amending Section 30-54-2 (A) 2 and 30-54-2 (B) 1 to allow halfway houses only by Special Use Permit in C-2, General Commercial Districts. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 0-022796-14 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE ORD URC 6. Ordinance vacating portions of a 10' waterline easement and a 20' sanitary sewer easement across property of R. S. Dickson & Company, DBA Ruddick Investment Company located at the intersection of Brambleton Avenue and Colonial Avenue. (Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney) 0-022796-15 FM MOTION TO APPROVE ORD URC 7. Ordinance vacating lots 16, 17, 18, and 19 of the Hidden Valley Subdivision accessed off Indian Grave Road and located in the Cave Spring Magisterial District upon the petition of Jeffrey W. Hodges and Cheryl A. Hodges. (George Simpson, Assistant Director of Engineering & Inspections) 0-022796-16 FM MOTION TO APPROVE ORD URC 8. Ordinance to rezone 11.47 acres from R-3 to C-2 with conditions to allow commercial uses, located on the west side of Ogden Road at the terminus of Leslie Lane, north of NS Railroad tracks, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Industrial Development Authority is (Angie Laing). (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 0-022796-17 FM MOTION TO APPROVE ORD URC 9. Ordinance to rezone 6.7 acres from R-3 to C-2 to allow commercial uses, located on the west side of Ogden Road, north of the NS Railroad tracks, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Industrial Development Authority (Stranna Arthur). (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 0-022796-18 FM MOTION TO APPROVE ORD URC THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC HEARING HAS BEEN CONTINUED UNTIL MARCH 26, 1996 BY THE PLANNING COMII~IISSION Ordinance to rezone 1.07 acres from C-2 to I-1 to construct offices and warehouse for pharmaceutical supplies at 7605 Robertson Lane, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of HCMF Corp. W. CITIZEN COMII~NTS AND COMMUNICATIONS 1. ROBERT K.__ EGBERT, 3571 BRADSHAW ROAD. ASKED THAT THE BOARD FORMALLY OPPOSE ANY REZONING OF THE CATAWBA VALLEY LAND THAT VA TECH IS PROPOSING TO SELL,, AND ESTABLISH A FOUNDATION TO PRESERVE OPEN SPACE BY ACCEPTING LAND DONATIONS, EASEMENTS OR CASH TO BUY THE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS. 13 2. JAN DOWLING~ 3126 GARST CABIN DRIVE. ASKED THAT THE BOARD PRESERVE THE VA TECH FARM: FOLLOW THE COUNTY'S VISIONING STATEMENTS; AND THAT CREATION OF A LAND TRUST WOULD BE HELPFUL. THIS SUBTECT WAS DISCUSSED DURING BOARD COMII~NTS AND STAFF WAS DIRECTED TO PREPARE REPORT CONCERNING OPTIONS FOR PRESERVATION OF THIS LAND. X. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Request for Public Hearing on March 26, 1996 for citizen comments on the Real Estate Tax Rate and the "Effective" Real Estate Tax Rate Increase. (Brent Robertson, Budget Manager) A-022796-19 FM MOTION TO SET PUBLIC HEARING FOR 3/26/96 AND ADVERTISE TAX RATE NOT TO EXCEED $1.13 PER $100 ASSESSED VALUATION AYES: FM~FFH, HCN, BL,.T NAYS: LBE 2. Request for Public Hearing on March 26, 1996 for citizen comments on the Personal Property and Machinery and Tools Tax Rates. (Brent Robertson, Budget Manager) AA-022796-20 FM MOTION TO SET PUBLIC HEARING FOR 3/26/96 AND ADVERTISE TAX RATE NOT TO EXCEED $3 50 PER $100 ASSESSED VALUATION URC Y. CONTINUATION OF WORK SESSION 1. Discussion of the following budget issues: (A) CIP Draft; and (b) Rollovers. AT 8:20 P.M., CHAIRMAN TOHNSON DECLARED A FIVE MINU'T'E RECESS TO RESUME BUDGET WORK SESSION IN 4TH FLOOR 14 TRAINING ROOM 1. ECH TO BRING BACK DRAFT OF ROLLOVER POLICY WITH 40% OF SAVINGS RETURNED TO DEPARTMENTS AFTER REVIEW BY ADMINISTRATOR, AND TO INCLUDE ONLY NON- RE000URRING CAPITAL EXPENSES. 2. BRENT ROBERTON RESPONDED TO QUESTIONS FROM THE SUPERVISORS ABOUT THE FORMAT OF THE CIP AND INDIVIDUAL PROTECTS. 2. BR WILL PROVIDE LIST OF CIP PROTECTS AND CRITERIA TO BOARD MEMBERS SO TIDY CAN RANK THE PROTECTS WITHIN THE NEXT TWO WEEKS. 3. CONSENSUS OF BOARD THAT RVRA BE CONTACTED ABOUT CONIlVIINGLED RECYCLING AT THE TRANSFER STATION AND THAT THE TOPIC BE ADDED TO THE AGENDA FOR 3/4/96 JOINT MEETING WITH CITY OF ROANOKE. Y. ADJOURNMENT AT 9:40 P.M., BL,T DECLARED THE MEETING AD TOURNED TO MARCH 4, 1996, AT 12:30 P.M., AT HOTEL ROANOKE, FOR TOINT MEETING WITH ROANOKE CITY COUNCIL 15 a w -~ C~Smxxttt~ ~f ~..utt~rl~.~e ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA February 27, 1996 Krrs r~ ~r~ Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement in order to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings or other programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County, please contact the Clerk to the Board at (703) 772-2005. We request that you provide at least 48- hours notice so that proper arrangements may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: Rev. Samuel Crews Coopers Cove Baptist Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS 1 C. D. E. F. G. H. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS BRIEFINGS 1. Report from Roanoke Partnership on activities Executive Director) Valley Economic Development during 1995. (Beth Doughty, NEW BUSINESS 1. Request for consideration of projects for 1996/97 Virginia Department of Transportation Revenue Sharing Program. (George Simpson, Assistant Director of Engineering & Inspections) 2. Request from The New Century Council to become a Partner in the organization and nominate individuals to serve on the Vision Committees. (Elmer Hodge, County Administrator) 3. Resolution approving the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Budget for Fiscal Year 1996/97. (Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance) 4. Request for approval to continue Roanoke County's share of cost allocation at 25% for the Roanoke County- Botetourt County Joint Library for Fiscal Years 1996/97 through 2000/2001. (Spencer Watts, Director of Libraries) OLD BUSINESS REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS s I. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA 1. Ordinance to rezone 315+ acres from R-l, AG-1, and AR to PRD, planned residential development to construct residential homes and commercial services, located on Cotton Hill Road, east and west of the Blue Ridge Parkway, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Boone, Boone & Loeb, Inc. 2. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to expand the existing church and school facilities, located on Williamson Road across from Brookside Shopping Center, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Shenandoah Baptist Church. 3. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to expand an existing manufactured home park, located at 5188 Yellow Mountain Road, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of Mountain Investors Corp. J. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES K. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizing the acquisition of easements to construct the Carvins Creek Sewer Interceptor and the Glenvar East Sewer Main. (Gary Robertson, Utility Director) L. APPOINTMENTS 1. Blue Ridge Community Services 2. Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals 3. Highway and Transportation Safety Commission 3 M. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WII.L BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WII.L BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the League of Older Americans -Advisory Council. 2. Approval of Raffle Permit for Child Abuse Prevention Council of Roanoke Valley, Inc. 3. Donation of storm drainage, sanitary sewer, and waterline easements in connection with the development of Harris Teeter at the intersection of Brambleton Avenue and Colonial Avenue by R. S. Dickson & Company, d/b/a Ruddick Investment Company. 4. Donation of existing pump station lot and related access easement in Section 1 of The Gardens of Cotton Hill from Strauss Construction Corporation. N. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS O. CITIZENS' COMII~NTS AND COMMUNICATIONS P. REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 4 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investments and Portfolio Policy, as of January 31, 1996 5. Statement of Estimated Revenues and Expenditures as of January 31, 1996 6. Bond Project Status Report Q. WORK SESSION 1. Discussion of the following budget issues: (a) Debt Policy; (b) CIP Draft; (c) Vehicle Inventory; (d) Year-end estimated expenditures and revenues; (e) Rollovers; (f) Update on BPOL Tax. R. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (5) discussion of prospective business or industry S. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION EVENING SESSION T. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Resolutions of Appreciation to John Molumphy and Larry Miles, Fire & Rescue volunteers, for over 25 years of service to Roanoke County s U. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Public Hearing for citizens comments regarding the budget for Fiscal Year 1996-97. (Brent Robertson, Budget Manager) 2. Public Hearing and Resolution adopting the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary Road Six Year Construction Plan for Fiscal Year 1996-2002, and allocation of funds for Fiscal Year 1996-97. (George Simpson, Assistant Director of Engineering & Inspections) PUBLIC HEEARINGS AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to construct a religious assembly facility, located at the intersection of Route 11 and State Route 777, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Christian Life Fellowship Pentecostal Holiness Church. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 2. Ordinance to rezone 1.448 acres from I-1 conditional to I- 1 to permit light industrial use, located at 6152 Twine Hollow Road, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Robert and I.R. Stverak. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 3. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to allow a dental laboratory at 2121 Electric Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the petition of Dental Prosthetics Inc. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 4. Ordinance to rezone 1.40 acres from C-2C to I-2C with conditions to permit a contractors storage yard at 2032 Hardy Road, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the 6 petition of Bedford Continuous Guttering Inc. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 5. Ordinance amending and reenacting Ordinance 82592-12, The Zoning Ordinance by amending Section 30-54-2 (A) 2 and 30-54-2 (B) 1 to allow halfway houses only by Special Use Permit in C-2, General Commercial Districts. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 6. Ordinance vacating portions of a 10' waterline easement and a 20' sanitary sewer easement across property of R. S. Dickson & Company, DBA Ruddick Investment Company located at the intersection of Brambleton Avenue and Colonial Avenue. (Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney) 7. Ordinance vacating lots 16, 17, 18, and 19 of the Hidden Valley Subdivision accessed off Indian Grave Road and located in the Cave Spring Magisterial District upon the petition of Jeffrey W. Hodges and Cheryl A. Hodges. (George Simpson, Assistant Director of Engineering & Inspections) 8. Ordinance to rezone 11.47 acres from R-3 to C-2 with conditions to allow commercial uses, located on the west side of Ogden Road at the terminus of Leslie Lane, north of NS Railroad tracks, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Industrial Development Authority (Angie Laing). (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 9. Ordinance to rezone 6.7 acres from R-3 to C-2 to allow commercial uses, located on the west side of Ogden Road, north of the NS Railroad tracks, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Industrial Development Authority (Stranna Arthur). (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC I:[EARING HAS BEEN COr1TINUED UNTII, MARCH 26, 1996 BY THE PL,~INNING COMMISSION Ordinance to rezone 1.07 acres from C-2 to I-1 to construct offices and warehouse for pharmaceutical supplies at 7605 Robertson Lane, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of HCMF Corp. W. CITIZEN CONIlVIENTS AND CO1bIlVILJIVICATIONS X. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Request for Public Hearing on March 26, 1996 for citizen comments on the Real Estate Tax Rate and the "Effective" Real Estate Tax Rate Increase. (Brent Robertson, Budget Manager) 2. Request for Public Hearing on March 26, 1996 for citizen comments on the Personal Property and Machinery and Tools Tax Rates. (Brent Robertson, Budget Manager) Y. ADJOURNMENT s ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~ - AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 27, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Report from the Roanoke Valley Economic Development Partnership on their activities in 1995. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Roanoke Valley Economic Development Partnership has requested time on this agenda to update the Board of Supervisors on their activities during the past year. Executive Director Beth Doughty will make the presentation. Submitted by: /Elmer C. Hodg County Administrator Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Harrison Johnson Minnix Kickens EXECUTIVE'S REPORT The Partnership announced 11 relocations and expan- sions in 1995 -the most in its 12-year history, Jobs were produced at a record pace. The Roanoke Valley led the state in job creation throughout most of 1995. Unemployment is at the lowest point in many years. Average wage rates rose more than five percent from 1994 to 1995. The statistical analysis for 1995 continues this upward trend; • Capital investment was up 242 percent • Potential jobs increased 23 percent • Inquiries increased 32 percent • Advertising inquiries increased 123 percent Interest was generated through targeted advertising and direct mail...marketing trips to New York, New England, and Pennsylvania...trade shows focusing on target industries...a new brochure on the Valley...and an innovative computer disk that provides data and other information on the area. The past year is another in a series of successes that makes the Partnership a model for regional economic devel- opment, Since mid-1992, the Partnership has worked on 32 successful expansions and relocations representing $165 million in investment and approximately 5,000 direct poten- tialjobs. The Partnership's many investors have made this quality program possible and, more importantly, the results a reality. yam`""' Beth Doughty Executive Director IOCAiION ASSISTANCE The Partnership answered approximately 390 information requests not generated by advertising. Companies that the Partnership helped sell on expansion in 1995 include: Sir Speedy Printing Food Lion, Inc. SteinMart Universal Self-Care Wildflour Cafe & Catering ROANONf VAIIfY ECONOMIC DfVEIOPMENT PARTNERSNIP Officers Charles A. Saldarini Anne Lee Stevens Macon Sammons Randolph M. Smith Staff T Richard Beard, Jr. M. Douglas Butler Beth Doughty Ann Blair Miller Anne D. Piedmont Faye Richardson President Vice President Secretary Treasurer Marketing Representative Investor Relations Executive Director Research Research Director Administration INQUIRIES Due to Advertising PROSPECT FILES OPENED 1995 LOCATIONS 9 ENPANSIONS Locations Arkay Packaging Rubatex Jacuzzi Whirlpool Fleetwood Homes Loman Garrett A.O. Smith Taylor Brothers Fluid Tech Lee Engineering Expansions. Transkrit Synchrony Potential Investment Employment (millions) 200 $17 70 n.a. 300 n.a. 250 $7 5 n.a. 130 $24 5 n,a. 6 n.a. 30 n.a. 25 n,a, 7 n.a. Projected Investment~miiiions~ Potential Jobs Retained Companies Retained Jobs February 26, 1996 Mary H. Allen Clerk-Roanoke Co. Supervisors _ . _ P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Dear Ms. Allen: P) It is with great pleasure that we send you the 1996 Annual Report of the Roanoke Valley Economic Development Partnership. In 1996, the Partnership announced 11 expansions and relocations -- the most in its 12-year history. This is even more impressive when you consider the impact of this job creation on the region's economy. I. Conservatively estimated, one new manufacturing job creates an additional service job. Therefore, potential jobs created by the Partnership's efforts eventually generate an equal number of jobs in support industries. Jobs Created in '95 Multiplier Direct & Indirect Jobs Created 1,028 x 2 = 2,056 II. Estimated Annual Payroll for potential jobs tallied in 1995: $19,400,000. III. COST BENEFIT RATIO Estimated Annual Payroll $ 19,400,000 10% of Projects' Values* $ 4,800,000 Partnership's Annual Operating Budget $ 645,039 RETURN ON PARTNERSHIP INVESTMENT 37 to 1 * 10 percent of the total investment figure is estimated to represent the minimum spent locally. Since June 1992, the Partnership has worked on 33 locations and expansions representing 267 million in investment and approximately 5300 direct jobs. Proof that your investment in the Partnership pays off. Sincer ly, Elizabeth S. Doughty Executive Director 711 FRANKLIN PLAZA, SUITE 333 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24011 5 4 0- 3 4 3- 1 5 5 0 1- 8 0 0- L O C A T E 2 FAX : 5 4 0- 3 4 4- 6 0 9 6 A-022796-1 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~ I AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 27, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Consideration of Projects for 1996-97 VDOT Revenue Sharing Program. COUNLTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: // / Q Th/J hc~j ~?26h 6_ ~/6•'~.'~ n/~[ly/^cz~t "~<r ~i0annF"~ ~-M«,~'~~;. /1BCc~mmc'n<~ C~PP/cv~ l , EXECUTIVE SUMMARY• Staff is requesting the Board of Supervisors to approve the prioritized list of projects for the FY 96-97 VDOT Revenue Sharing Program and authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to sign the attached letter of intent to participate in the Revenue Sharing Program for Fiscal Year 1996-97. BACKGROUND• The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) annually provides localities the opportunity to receive State matching funds for the construction, maintenance, and improvement to primary and secondary roads in the State's highway system. The Commonwealth of Virginia provides $10,000,000 for the matching program and limits participating localities to $500,000 each. However, if more or fewer than 20 counties participate, our share of money will be reduced/increased proportionately. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: County and VDOT staff presented the proposed priority project list for the FY 96-97 Revenue Sharing Program at the February 13, 1996 Board of Supervisors work session. Staff provided the Board a report containing the 87 projects with maps and justification on how projects were evaluated for inclusion in the revenue sharing plan. 1 s Having made the changes which staff presented to the Board by memorandum dated February 13, 1996 and receiving no additional request, staff is requesting the Board of Supervisors to approve the priority list of projects for FY 96-97 Revenue Sharing Program. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: 1) Approve the project list and authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to sign the attached letter and defer appropriation of the funds ($500,000) until July 1, 1996. 2) Decline to participate in the Revenue Sharing Program for Fiscal Year 1996-97. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative 1. ITTED BY: A~fiol2~ Cov~;~ Director o Engineering & Inspection APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hod e County Administrator ------------- ------------------------------ ACTION ------------- -------- VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Motion by Bob L. No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Johnson to approve staff Eddy x Received ( ) recommendation Harrison x Referred ( ) Johnson x To ( ) Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections 2 ~-I County Primary and Secondary Road Fund (Revenue Sharing Program) Code of Virginia, Section 33.1-75.1 Fiscal Year 1996-97 County of Roanoke February 28, 1996 Mr. James S. Givens State Secondary Roads Engineer Virginia Department of Transportation 1401 East Broad Street Richmond, Virginia 23219 Dear Mr. Givens: The County of Roanoke, Virginia, indicates by this letter its official intent to participate in the "Revenue Sharing Program" for Fiscal Year 1996-97. The County will provide $500,000 for this program, to be matched on a dollar-for-dollar basis from funds of the State of Virginia. The County worked with its Resident Engineer, and developed the attached prioritized list of eligible item(s) of work recommended to be undertaken with these funds. The County also understands that the program may be reduced on a pro rata basis if requests exceed available funds. Having requested the maximum amount of State funds, the County further requests the opportunity to match additional funds if they are made available. Sincerely, Chairman, Board of Supervisors pc: Resident Engineer Attachments: Priority Listing of Projects ~`° M ~ ~ E~ ~ Q W --' w (~ w ~ Q ~ F+r r ~ O W Oz w W ~ Q Q zoo ~/ ~1 ~ ~ W w Q G7~ ~ ° ~ Q E:: U U W / {~.~ F., ."", ~ ~ Q ~ W [.. W a W C~ O O O O O O O O O O } Z Z L Z Z Z Z Z 2 Z - Q~ z X m ~:. O H (- F f- F F- F F H F CL w O U O O O O O O O O O O o z a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o ca o > x 3 ° > > > > > > > > > > n O w X a X_ ~ Y ` Y, ~ X ~ X ~ X_ ~ X ~ r X ~ ~ X ~ ~ 1G O "' F a "' F z "' F- a ti F ac v, F a rn F xt ~ F a n F a a F a CC G ¢ ¢ ¢ % s ¢ a ¢ ¢ o w ~ ~ z ~ e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e z x ~ w a °- z ~ r ti r ~: > ~ } ~ r ~ r ~ r ~ r ~ ~ ~ r o . e ~ w rx w w o ~ z o o c c o 0 0 0 0 0 a o~ z z z z z z z z z z m z Gov a ~ ~ ~ ` N N ~ ~ 0. ~ h a~ a U ~ ~' r U O m m c ° i e n~ ~ ~ _ v w w > °' W O N v. a w O O c,.. ~' O (j ~~ U O y a U O N W U O ~ a w O O w w O O W u. O O w W O O K W ~ K N K v m N C c o a o a a °~° a d° z M z n~ i O ~ o W F- "' ~ W W o C W O o w W q W o W W n w~ W- W~~ -, W O y. E.. F cG ~ W Z F W F W F w. _ W .S F W .~ F W ,:7 F w F W F W W a ~ F W W a H ~ W F W ~ H ~ ~ O a ~ a ~ ~ ? r U ? ~ U ~ ~ v ? ~ U ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ y. ~ ° z a' K a tL O re _ O C O C O C O rX O rL O C O w v, F. u.. O _ ~,., u. c,., F W F ~*- F- w F A Q a W .-. O O ~ O O N N M ~ 30`~ ~'o^; C.Y ~' ~ ~ m r, N ~ O O N N N W~ a O O O O O O O O O O O ~ ~ Z a m w w ~ v w w w w ~ w , ,~ c~~3~ r ~- } r r ~ ~- r ~ r F a z } ¢ a ~ s ¢ ¢ a ¢ ¢ a C z w z z z z z z z z z z a U z ~, .~ O o o ° ° ° ° ° U Z n ? ° ~ o 0 a w z z 0 Y F F= Z m y^~ ° o v ~ o c o °o ~o °o o v °o o _ ~ "' = = o _ rn ^ ~ _ N a: ~ O F+ U z 0 U a a~ ~ C ~ ~ z x Q z W H z z ct o ct 0 ' Z~ ~ oo ~ m o Q "' o z '~ ,~' O m o ~ w o U °O o S °~ o}~ 0 0 j N o ~~ ~~ ~ A F ' ~ U o _ ~ ~ °- ~ H . ° ~ ~ ~ .n Z °- `' V] ° cG ° ~ n z ° ~ ~ ° `n ° ~ ~ °~ W _ a z .on O W _ v ~ ~' ° O `--~ ^ ~ [" v ~ O y G a W w a ~"' ' W o W] F' 0 2 H W _ W E" F-. l:.l o ~ F- W o ~ F- G W o z F- W ~ ~ F- i W ~" C :L f- i W ^~ C 1 F- ~ a o L C . _ y p: _ z Y "' ? tL _ j C _ a C _ U IY _¢ K = w O 0.' T W O 4' 0. ce m s ¢ ~ ~ m < ~ ~ x ~ ~ O U ¢ m o z 59 ~' w O N W Q LL oz Q ~ E"" W z O w W ~ Q Q zoo ~/ ~I ~ ~ W w Q w ,~ _ ~, U ~z /'1 c ~ ~ Q 0 a~ o z o 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 z ~. z z z z z z z z z z X P7 F., O F F F F F F F F F F a w o U o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o z c o o ~ ~ o o _ c Q A o ~ 3 0 > a 0 O Z x x x r, N r, x ~ x x x_ ~ x F~ im ~~ i F f ~- F N F F~ 'k F N i ( (-.. ~ ~ F , Z v i Z v Z~ Z~ Z x 'z. ~ Z Z v i Z Z '- ~~ ~- '- '- '- '- ~- '- ''- 3a - a c. . ~ - - c - a - a a - a a F z m w a ~, ~, a O O ~ w ~, w ~: W ~ W ~ w ~ w ~ W ~ w w w a ~, w r r r r r r r r r } a ~ w w a~~ o o c o o O o 0 0 0 b o y z z z z z z z z z z m z W ~ U a Q ~ ~ ~ _ L G V] V] ~ VI p aaa N a c ~ a U ~ ~} D V ~ _ - 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ,n a b CI - N N w w > °' v, w O O W w O O W r- p C - U O ~ ~,. a p O :z U O ~ c•. v. O O ct D O Z v, k. O O W W O O ,n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ H H O O C fL n w .-. w_ 2~ M a rn W_ W_ F C m C _ L_ F ~ ._., D a y. '"~ - m W- g - ~ ~^ O W a C y' ,^ c:v w W w CG ~ W_ Q w ~ ~ ~ M w° W- F W F w ~ K w - w- F W F W Gac F F W F W z F Z F W F W Z F Z~ F _ W Z F Z F ~ - W .. Z F ',7 (-. W W Z F o F e x . o F 0 : F F 'z F '~ F cL a ~-. Z F O rG Z F~ F cC x Z F~ F a o: cG ~ o: ~ c _ ~ C x U c O o U W z O a O O w O w O ~ ~ _ O ~ O ~ O x D O x O K O ~ O O N N N a w N ' 'o z -~ O ~-• b U V O N r a ~ N m ~ O 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ w o 0 0 0 0 ..7 O >, ~ > Z "~ c w} a w w `n ~ w w w w m w z - r } } r r r r r r r ~ w ~ a r a a ¢ a ¢ ° `' z z z z z z z z z z z -a a , 4 V Z Z O O O 0 ~ O ~ Q O ~ F= V M r rl V ~ ~n V ~ N Q w G z 0 F ~ o o c o ° ° z m ~, ~ o o o , c ° 0 ~, 0 c a " F. ~, r; N a ~ ~ _ ~ ~ N - U z 0 U W ~ a Q a R~ L y O ~ W _ Q oo ~~ C w _~ ~ oo K ~~ ~n ~ M ^ ~ Z b r` .Z.1 c p °~ } O ? () ~ ~ O U ~' 0o O W ~~ F ¢ W ^ x F = c _ Z m ~ F rn W n~ F <n w ,`„ ~ F ~ w ,~ W F a~ W ~~ K F o¢ W F n uai F y Z~ U C ~' a 5 ~ c S W C O ~ O E, rG - O a =¢ N _~ cG a ~+ ~ n D F c ~, z 60 61 62 L "' w N W C7 Q a ~ i oz Q ¢ ~" W Ozw W z ~ O ~ Q zoo ~/ w Q w W '"~ Q ~ r^ r VJ ~; U z ~ W ~-. Q c .-. W Q ~+ ^ w z o z o o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 a w w> Q t .. z z z z z z z z z z z `1 Ci F., O F F F _ F F F F F F C w O U O O G O O O O ° O ^ O ^ O o z ^ o o > x ~ ~ ° > ° °> > Q ^ O w x x r, x x x x x x x z s r ~} ~ r ~ r ~ r L r z} ~ r ~ r ~ r z ° " N z '~ z" z~ z" z" z" ~ c z~ z z c a a c a ~ a a a F z x ~ w C O V ~, uJ v, W ~ W ~ :~] v, W ~ W ~ W v, W rn W v, W a ~, w r } r r r r r r r r a z w w c ,~, z o o c c o 0 0 0 0 0 a o r z z z z z z z z z z m z z^v a U U ~ ~a V O O O ~ _ O N ~ N ~ ~ O C C N w i O O O H O O C ~ O O O O y O Z O rn O ~ ~, O z V] R Vl ~ ~1 rn m c, V1 T (n ~ ~ V tnj rn w ~ ~ C J P '~: N O VI ^ ._ L1 W a` N ~ V] ~ ~ T ~ c` rn ~ [17 W T ^ V1 ~ W l rn ^ [~x rn ~ ~ ~ b ^ ~ ~ h ~ ~ .~ W ~ m W ~ ~ ^ a O 4 [ id F F F Ems { F °' F. F ( ~-. E F '._ _ F F F F. ~ F F F FW- J . F F W F EW„ ..1 F W o Fa' F F W w - z~o`~ ~~ ~ ~ z` ~ ~o`~ a`~" ~~ aa" `~ O ~~o o c ~e o - ~e F w O o W F W a O w v F p-. v.. F rz. F F W ~ . ^~ W ~ ~ CI N ~ N N ~ ('1 ~ 3 c n F O .. O N O V ~' ~ N ~ O O ~.1 O N ~~ ..l O O O O O O O O O O O ~+ ~ ~ Z N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ^ ~ r z LN[] r ~ } ~ ~ V r [J C r IJ L r x1 [ r i.l l r W } L7 L r ~ ~ 3 C >' Q ? 2 ? 2 ? ? ? z a z z z z z z z z z z C a z Z ° ° ° o ° ° ° ° ~ o w Up... o ~ o o ~ - o n ~ m rl r, _ N 1-, ~ G z 0 F » Z p oo °m ° oo ° °w ° ° ~ o O CC v U F r v1 - N oo N r1 ... N rn Z O U ..7 Q~ ^ ~ D W 0.' U Z ~ y F Z ~ C ~ ^ c~ a ^ r ti o C o~ ^ r ~ C o } o - ~ Z ° o ^ ~ ~ ° O^ o ? ~ O .n ~ ^ e o Q ~ '. ~ ~ ov ~o ~^ F ~ o g ~ c 2 W o W P p W ~ L m~ r n W Z c oo i ~.l a ~ , o m W ~ ^ C W Z r~ [x7 ~ 3 W ° a~ o U W ~ Z e F cG e F FG K C - F o C K C F c>: c p F ¢: o O ~"" 1 ~ o F G ~ W F C ¢ F ~ W a' o. ~ o ¢ o a o c m 0 ~ ._ _ ~ c _ ~ O m a ~ W W F rn = 63 ~~~ w W C~ o z Q¢~" W Q Ozw W O ~ Q zoo ~/ ~i HN Q w W ~ - E; ; U U W 0 c `--~ ~ ~ Q ~F° w z^~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ w w} z z z z z z z z z z a z z Y m ~:. O F F F- _ F F F F F F a w o V o 0 o b n ° n a o o ° ° > ° _ c > z a > ~ ~ > > > > O Z x 'z } x_ ~ } r. _ } x i } x ~ ~ x z ~ x i v} i x ~ vri x ~ vri x ~ ~ x a a x x _ ~ ac z i Z z~ CL ^ Z ~ , z v `° Z Z '° Z ~ Z ~ ~ ~ ~ v i ~ ~ ow ^ a a a a = a ~ a c ¢ a a c a w a a a s E- z m ~ w a° z r r ~ Y r r r i r a ~ w a x ~ w c ,~, z o o 0 0 0 0 0 o e a p} z z z z z z z z z z °' z z^v a C a ~ a ` c a a a a ~ ' a a c ~% ~ ~ U ~ ~ .~ a c U^ rn ^ ,- - ~o ~ O a w w ~ 0. v O O O ~ O v: ., O O O O O ~ O ~ ~ O O O O O O < O V1 V1 ° ~ ~ ~ 'J' VI T ~ b O !/1 ° ^', ~ ~ C i ° W C ~ ~ ~ w N `~ ~ W M N ~ ° y M .~/-. 00 ° z W Q W VI W W W fn ~ ~ ° ~ 00 ~ 00 v1 ° w ~ 00 V W O a [., F F E W [-~ W .~ F W_ _ ~ F, ~ t:.l cW.. W F W F- W~ W L W .] ~ W F W F W F W F W Z W R Z K Z C Z~ U ? '-~ U - .` o. C z C~~ ~ Ea' o C o K U ° a~ Fa' Z a~~ Z Fi' ,n C ~ ~ w O C O ~ ~ ~ ~ O K O w ~ ~ vim a O ., u _ , F ^ Q OK ~ O O O O _ ~ N N N O .... -o~ ' ~~~ o o ~ - ~ - o ~ o ~~~ O O C O O O O O O O ., v O } ~ > z `n ^ ~ Y ~ c`na `" `n w c u w w w ri: ~ z - ~,~3~ } } % ~- } } } } } } F a ~ ~' 4 a Q a a a ~ a a ~ z ° a z z z z z z z z z -~ z a U z ~, ^' z ~ ~ ° c o ~ °o ~ c o ~. ~ a ~" G z 0 Z C1 y o°o m x ° ° °~ ° o° ~ 1°- ~ C n - - ., .~ - N N _ m - F+ U Z O .> F ~. G F O~_ - Q 1 I N ~- ~. O O > a K 2 C ~n F m `~ F m r V] N ~ V] N C Yn N U w w C z~ O} .Pp C Z O^~ O W oo O~ O N W O z ap O z m O 'z o0 ~^ V _> ,. 2 ~ L~iJ W c a ._ .':: L W o C W = F W = F W ~ ( O W ~ F- <`l ~ W _ r F W - O ^ 7 L Z ~ . j N _ W _ ~ tr. f... _ ^ CG ~ 4_ o Z F. cG m W (" ~ c m !n ~"' W 4' m ti F W CC F K ~- W } F -~ 0. C } F °O L-•~ . ~ O O ~ U O ~ O 64 ~" w W Q a W Ozw W 1 Q zoo ~/ ~L~ Q w W ,~ C c ~ Q ~ ~; ~, U ~z ~° ~~ N r^ r^ Q ~ W F. ~ a C z O O O O O O O O O O W >. - Z Z Z Z z Z Z z Z Z ~ Z Y m F., O F F F F F F F H F F rX w O U O O O O O O O O O O O Z A O O Q > ~ D > O ~ O 0 3o>z 0 O w Y, X_ Y. X Y. Y. Y, X X_ X ~ ~ F~ F N E = F~ F a F~ F x F~ [- ~ F z a ~ w s q C7 N w ~ w ~: w ~ w ~ w ~ w ~ w ~ w ~, w ~ w r a ~, w r r r r r r r r r Q a w w ; z a o o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 , a o r z z z z z z z z z z G° z Z U W Q ~ O a _ ` F a ~ a ~ ~ a a C a a v i a . a a U ~ U q o o _ o _ ~ o 0 0 x ~i r r V O _ ~ n _ M ~ N N w a ~ w o O Z ~~ w w o O ~ 1 N~ a ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ C_ N y= •• ~. O O y '~ N ~ w w O O H N~ N~ w w O O N~ N w o O Z (n W ~- o O~ z V1 O w 0 0 ~ ~ m W N 0 0 ~ ,~ L•7 ~~ O 0 ,y m p F Q a oo w m w- F' _ ~ z w- ~~ a '~ w w a m a w- W- F a a oo w w a oo C1 W _ Q a co q w Q en ~ _~_ W Z F Q ~ F z' F Z F Z ;ti Z~ Z F F Z F , Z ~ F~ F ~ F Q ~ H A ~^ F o F a F ~. F ~, a a z a - a-- - a _ a a a a a a - a a a a a O a w a C ~ _ O F a O F ~ a O w F a O w F a O w F a O F a O ~ E- F ~ - r - w O p X N ~ O N Q v _ .... _ - N - •-• 3 c za_ ~ a °' ~ o ~° o = o ~ o o a z w v o 0 0 0 0 0 o a o . aO } ~ > Z N al A ~ ~" CN[J [N[J !~_' [Nil [Nil LNtI CNiJ x1 [ W W . z ~ r r r r r r r r r r ., mw3 ~'~ z y Q Q Q Q ¢ Q ¢ Q a z z z z z z z z z z a z 0. O Z r~ 00 _ ° 00 0 0 0 00 0 U Z vi .. o 0 0 0 E ~ ,~ - - - •p - Q z 0 } ~. O O O Z G7 ~ ~ P ~ 0 00 ~ O O a ~ - rl ~ _ ry .-. b .~ ~" U z 0 U w w o Z m o Q o, c~ oc o z N~ o a o a N C7 ~ w ~; o w "+ ~ ~l ~ "* z - _ 7 ~ F ~ F w ~ F w _ ~ F w ~ y vt ~ ~'' w vi ~'" w ti O U Q w - r F 7 w C ~~ H ~ „ z ~- (x ~ X F °% X F ,°o X F- yon X F ~ a F m u F ~~ F C Z O ~ __ w a ~ _ ,, a - O~ _ w a _ w a _ w a O _ w a O _ p a O a O O a O 0., ~ - Z O O F a i' O oa m 65 ,,,, ,~ f~ -mom w O W C7 Q 0. oz Q~~ W Oz w W zoo ~/ ~1 Q w W a `n d F,_, U ~z ~r ^' v J Q w F W w z o~ o o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 a w w ~, z z z z z z z z z z v '~ z `~ s Y Pa F O F F F F F F F F F a w o u o o_ c o 0 0_ o 0 0 0 0 ° ^ ° ° ° _ ° ° ° ° > z 0 > ~ > > > > > > > 0 O w x x_ x x x x x x x x ~ c ~ O F x F N F ~_ F a F u F a F ac F u N F N ~ b z ~D lD b ~ b ~ ~ b p w ¢ c ¢ ~ ~ ¢ c ¢ a ¢ a. ¢ a ¢ a a ¢ a z E a w a o~ N W N w N ~ N W N w N w N w N w N w N w w~~ r r r r r r r r r ¢ a w w A a z o o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 a o~ z z z z z z z z z z 07 z W Ca U O ~ N a ~ v: rn F v~ v~ rn ~n rn N N R ' a a, N N N N N N N ~ a U N N ,, ~A ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~, ~ ~ o x a N N m - ~ w > a w w O O w w O O c. r'-. O '- ^ O Z w p O "" ^ 0 Z. w w O O e ' a ^ 0~ Z. w u. O O H w ^ O 'Z z ,,, vac v~_ C v~=~n m C C rn ~ '-~ ^~ ; 3'-~w ~ ~~ c ~n cC e N~ ~ 3 w N~ rn ^m_ vNi K r~ c cn ... W C rn v~~~n _ W r K m rnNW C m , , OO a C •n w° W - m w-w- . u--- G p _ '-¢, G ca-- ~ p --¢ , w- W - F p w-¢ , wow p w¢ F y. F., ~,s, F w F w Z~ Z~ F W F w Z~ Z F w _ Z C '`_^- ~ w W o ~ p w F W z K o EC ~ W W ~ F p " W F w Z~ F Z F ~ a F W w ZC F p `~ F W W Z F~ F `~ a w w 'Z F p a ~ o C x o z ~ ~ . o ~ ° o x o x o x o m o ~+- E.., ~. F W F w O ~ F u- F w F w F w F F D G a m ~ N r0,, 'V O ~ O O N O 3 c xo~ F p" _ Z ~ .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a O t ^~ C w ~ z~ x w r v r U i ~ } w r u r w r w r w r w r w ~ 3 F a Z ~ ~' ¢ ¢ ¢_ ! 2 ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ z a z z z z z z z z z z a z N ° Z c ° o w U ~.., ~ .... ~ C m - ~~ ° T > N ° N~ °. ^ ¢ G z 0 ~ F F O c o ~ c c o 0 0 0 z p~ ~ ~ o O ~ 0 0 0 °v °o °o o a" F. N C - ~D V N N _ -- U Z O U ¢ ~ C ce ~ C ^ s ~ ^ O ^ a p ., Z~ w O w m - N~ G nL~ O 't z oo : 'n Z C ' . z, ~O , T 1~ Z. C 00 J t~ h P W V7 w F O~ O (~ ~ O - O¢~ O K p O 2 p O W M O O_ O m O E M ^wi G ~ Z v ~¢ vJ ~~ :; r w oo = w oo T w a~ F W ~p 2 W r a w ~ rFi~ W O ~ = F ' S ~ J' i ~ ¢ ~ ~ V ~ ~ U K Q ~ W 7 C 'N^ ~ m z ~ Z _ p ~ ^ _ _ _ _ ~ _ _ . . _ ~ '_ w a m ; u j j u ~ F o ~ 66 ~~ O1 w 0 W Q a ~ -I ~ I. ~.y z p.L { W Ozw W I~i ~ Q Q zoo (~ ~ t~ Q w `~ W ~' Q ~ ~, U U W (^ ^ 1"~ x _ Q a G a a~ o z ~; o z 0 z 0 z 0 z 0 z 0 z 0 z i z O~ F O O C O O U GS O O O O Z O O C ^ C ^ C ^ ^ A rn X W z L ~ z r z rn W z z d o_ rn w z W rn w z w F Z w 2 L Z~ W F ~ c F~ U w 2 L -r ~._, ~ -C v 2 L rJ 2~ .Y O ao w 2 N >_ ~ O W ~> C '_ ~~ z W ¢> O ~~ z W a> '~ w ¢> O W m . ~~ 0.- C O K O ^ ~ E: ~ K O ^ CG O0., ^ ^ c - ? c - _ a L C7 Z p, ~ p. ~ F z C C V ~ ~, ~ w r w r ~' r u r w r w r w r ~ ~ Q a z o 0 0 0 o O o a o r z z z z z z z m z W U ° a ~ C O rn ~ F ~ _ - ~ ~ ~ rn L a ~ ~ ~ a U ~ ~ > n U O vii O V W N X W t1 n N ~~ C - N W 0. > ~,_, c:. p O v. p a p _ ~ ~^ a u. p p O O O O b ~ W ^ ~ W ~ r~ e^'I " I~ N N ~ ... b ~n P ~ O ~ t1 w~ w~ z W z ~ w O w~ Z ~ z ~ O 0 F ~ F w F ~ ~ F ~.., z' w ¢ p F L F_ _ W 2' w F w F W L w~ W ~ W~ W w z~z~ z`X r zc = zc'~" z zzzz °a=~ °~=a ce O ct ~ _ O d O O O a F c:. r: _ ~.., ~ F. F ~ F ~ A Q z w ~ _ ~ a o ~ _ 30 xo~ F c~ a ^' ~ o o S o 0 z~~ o o ~ o 0 0 0 v O r ~ > z "~ G w ~ ' a w w u v vl w cNu ' z - r r r r r r r E C' ~ r Q ¢ ¢ ¢ 2 o z a z z z z z z z `z .. a V z y ~ z " v - - F O ~. - - n - - - L Ls. z 0 ~"" ~ o °o o °o ° o °o O W ry a " c, o c oo_ O - 0 0 F, U Z O Q a ~ ^ C d' Q L ~ O O n O^~ O r-. L ~ ^ O~~ > ~ Q om- ~ z. V w O U e~ ~"' ~ Y W c c; - 1 W F ^¢ W ~° 2 W ~' ~ w a m z a u O ~ v 67 A-022796-2 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~- AT A REGULAR MEETING. OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 27, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Request from the New Century Council to become a Partner in the Organization and Nominate Individuals to serve on the Vision Committees COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR~B COMMENTS: Recommend Approval. We are contacting Roanoke Valley Executive Director Bev Fitzpatrick to invite him to attend the Board meeting. We should decide at this meeting whether to become a Partner so that the New Century Council can move forward. If we choose be become a Partner, Mr. Fitzpatrick will let us know when the Council will need our nominations, and whether those nominations should be staff, elected officials or citizens. BACKGROUND: The New Century Council was formed in late 1993 as a coalition of business and local leaders to develop a vision for the New River Valley and Roanoke Valley. Over 1100 volunteers spent over a year developing strategies to meet the vision for the next century. Thirty-three committees developed approximately 150 strategies to serve as a guide for the next 20 years. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: At the New Century Steering Committee meeting on November 8, 1995, the Council adopted a new structure to implement the work begun by the volunteers. The new structure places emphasis on involvement by Partner organizations that are well established in the New Century Region. To be a Partner, an organization must accept the seven major vision statements adopted by the volunteers and approved by the New Century Council Board. A copy of the statements is attached. A partner does not have to agree with all of the detailed strategies developed by the committees. Each participating Partner may nominate representatives to serve on the seven vision committees. The committees are: Economy, Education, Quality of Life, Infrastructure, Governance, Leadership, and Health and Safety. Attached is a copy of a letter from the New Century Council requesting that the County of Roanoke become a Partner organization, and nominate individuals representing Roanoke County to be on the seven vision committees. The Council was requesting a response by February 20, but the County did not receive the ~'~ letter until February 14, after our first meeting in February. FISCAL IMPACT: None. Participation as a Partner would only obligate us to nominate individuals to serve on the vision implementation committees and to accept the vision statements. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: (1) that the County of Roanoke participate as a Partner in the New Century Council. (2) If the Board agrees to participate, you will need to nominate individuals to serve on the vision implementation committees. Respectfully Submitted by: Elmer C. H ge ~~ County Administrator ------------- -------------------------------- ACTION ----------- -------- VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Motion by Harry C. No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Nickens to apurove participa- Eddy x Received ( ) tion as a Partner and Board to Harrison x Referred ( ) offer nominees for subcommitteesJohnson x To ( ) by the 3/12/96 meeting Minnix x Nickens x cc: File New Century Council File o~ ROANp,I.~ ti p z c~ J a 1838 MARY H. ALLEN, CMC CLERK TO THE BOARD C~~~xxY~ ~a~ ~~xxr~.~.~ P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2005 FAX (703) 772-2193 March 5, 1996 Mr. Beverly T. Fitzpatrick, Jr. Director, Roanoke Valley New Century Council P. O. Box 18084 Roanoke, VA 24014 Dear Mr. Fitzpatrick: BRENDA J. HOLTON DEPUTY CLERK At their meeting on February 27, 1996, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors approved the parkicipation of Roanoke County as a Partner in the New Century Council. Attached is the information requested on the County's participation. The County has not yet appointed any members to serve on the vision committees. These appointments have been placed on the March 12 Board of Supervisors agenda. When individuals are appointed, I will send you the necessary information. Please call me if you need further information. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Elmer C. Hodge, Administrator Roanoke County February 9, 1996 Page 2 ~~` We look forward to hearing of your decision to become a Partner so that we, together, can build a better future for our citizens, businesses, and governments in the New Century Region. After deciding to become a Partner, we need you to nominate individuals representing Roanoke County to be on our seven vision implementation committees. The committees are aligned directly with our major topics: Economy, Education, Quality of Life/Environment, Health and Safety, Infrastructure, Governance, and Leadership. Feel free to nominate people to each committee or to those which are of interest to Roanoke County. Please feel free to call us if you have any questions. Our best for a wonderful New Year! Sincerel , Beverly T. Fitzpatrick, Jr. Director, Roanoke Valley (540) 982-3720 4'-~. Edwin B. J. Whitmore III Director, New River Valley (540) 231-8931 Enclosures P.S. For your information, following is a list of the Committee Chairs. Economy Committee ............................ William B. Bales Education Committee .... ...... ~ .................. Ronald E. Chaffin Quality of Life Committee ..........................James C. Sears Infrastructure Committee . ...................... S. Kendall Anderson Governance Committee .. ..................... John B. Williamson III Leadership Committee ... ...................... Dr. Edwin L. Barnes Health & Safety Committee ........................ Dr. A. Carol Pratt THE NEW CENTURY COUNCIL PARTNER ORGANIZATION NOMINATION FORM 1/96 As a Partner organization, I (Partner) nominate the following individual(s) to the vision implementation committees listed below: Teams (Please use back for additional nominations.) ECONOMY Name/Title: Address: Phone: Fax: __ ___ EDUCATION Name/Title: ... Address: Phone: Fax: QUALITY OF LIFE/ Name/Title: ENVIRONMENT Address: Phone: Fax: GOVERNANCE Name/Title: Address: Phone: Fax: HEALTH & SAFETY Name/Title: Address: Phone: Fax: INFRASTRUCTURE Name/Title: Address: Phone: Fax: LEADERSHIP Name/Title: Address: Phone: Fax: Return to: The New Century Council / P.O. Box 18084 / Roanoke, VA 24014 / (540) 982-3720 THE NEW CENTURY VISION FOR WESTERN VIRGINIA ECONOMY ED UCA TIDN QUALITY OFLIFE/ ENVIRONMENT HEALTH AND SAFETY INFRASTRUCTURE GOVERNANCE LEADERSHIP The economy of the New Century Region is diverse and globally competitive. The New Century Region is a world leader in public and private education. The New Century Region is among the most desirable places in the world to live and work. The New Century Region is renowned as the safest and healthiest place to live and work. The New Century Region's infrastructure systems link the region and the world. The New Century Region's governments are partners investing in tomorrow. The New Century Region is a model for America in leadership, regional identity and creation of 21st Century opportunities. 1/96 ~~~ THE NEW CENTURY COUNCIL PARTNER ORGANIZATION PARTICIPATION RECORD The Roanoke County Board of Supervistner) has read and approved the seven broad vision statements created by the citizens of the New Century Region and wishes to participate in helping tomake the visions of the New Century Region a reality. This action was taken on February 2 7 , 19 9 6 (Date) by a vote of the Roanoke County Board of Su ervisors (Board of Directors, County Board, City Council, Town Council, Commissioners, etc.). ~• t./ (Signature) Contact Person: Elmer C . Hodge County Administrator Title: Company: County of Roanoke Clerk to the Board (Title) March 5, 1996 (Date) Address: P• 0. Box 29800, Roanoke, VA 24018 Telephone: 540-772-2004 Fax: 540-772-2193 Return to: The New Century Council / P.O. Box 18084 / Roanoke, VA 24014 / (S40) 982-3720 ,.. ~` February 9, 1996 2--~ ~~ Elmer C. Hodge, Administrator Roanoke County P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Dear Elmer: At the New Century Steering Committee meeting on November 8, 1995, we adopted a new structure to move The New Century Council forward. It creates a very inclusive role for citizens and organizations throughout the region. The new structure, as recommended by the Continuity to Assure the Reality of the Vision Committee, places great emphasis on involvement by Partner organizations. These are current groups, like yours, who are well established in the New Century Region. They have been named by our 1,000+ volunteers as organizations whose participation is appropriate to bring the vision to reality. The list of possible Partners is a compilation of all groups recommended in the document that people feel should play a role in making our preferred future come true. To be a Partner, an organization must accept the seven major vision statements adopted by our volunteers and approved by our Board. We have enclosed a copy of the seven vision statements for your review. As a Partner, it is not necessary for you to agree with all 150+ detailed strategies. Each Partner will have the opportunity to nominate representatives to serve on our seven vision committees. Seven out of the ten members on each committee will be from Partner organizations throughout the New Century Region. Between now and February 20, our first priority is to determine which organizations will formally approve the seven visions and become Partners in moving the region forward. We would like to formally ask your Board to become a Partner organization. It would mean a lot to this effort to have Roanoke County working with us to make the region better for all our citizens. Our goal is to move forward, naming our committees and our Partners by the end of February 1996. If you are willing to participate in this leadership effort, please complete the enclosed "Partner Organization Participation Record" and return it to our office as soon as possible. Timing is important, and we do not want anyone to be left out who would like to be a Partner. Post Office Box 18084, Roanoke, Virginia 24014 703 982-3720 A VISION FOR WESTERN VIRGINIA. r C^-3 AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 1996 RESOLUTION 022796-3 APPROVING THE ROANORE REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION BUDGET FOR FY 1996-97, UPON CERTAIN TERMS AND CONDITIONS WHEREAS, Section 24.B of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Act and Section 17.(a) of the contract between the City of Roanoke, Roanoke County, and the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission provide that the Commission shall prepare and submit its operating budget for the forthcoming fiscal year to the Board of Supervisors of the County and City Council of the City; and WHEREAS, by report dated February 14, 1996, a copy of which is on file in the office of the Clerk to the Board, the Executive Director of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission has submitted a request that the County approve the FY 1996-97 budget of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia that the FY 1996-97 budget and proposed capital expenditures for the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission as set forth in the February 14, 1996, report of the Commission Executive Director, a copy of which is incorporated by reference herein, is hereby APPROVED, and the County Administrator and the Clerk are authorized to execute and attest, respectively, on behalf of the County, any documentation, in form approved by the County Attorney, necessary to evidence said approval. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: 1 A AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. H ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Jacqueline L. Shuck, Exe Director, Roanoke Regional Airport Bob L. Johnson, Chairman, Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Mary F. Parker, Clerk, Roanoke City Council 2 Bob L. Johnson, Chairmcn Kit B. Kiser,. \1~ce Chairmcn Claude N. Sr~~th James M. Turner, Jr. Arthur M. Whittaker, Sr. Jacqueline L. Shuck, Executive Director Honorable Chairman and Members Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke, Virginia Dear Gentlemen: 5202 Aviation Drive ~~~ Roanoke, Virginia 2401 2-1 1 48 (540) 362-1999 FAX (540) 563-4838 14, 1996 Re: Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Fiscal Year 1996-97 Budget and Proposed Capital Expenditures In accordance with the requirements of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Act, and the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Contract dated January 28, 1987, submitted for your approval is the Airport Commission's 1996-97 proposed Operating and Capital Purchases Budget, as well as a separate listing of proposed capital expenditures which are expected to exceed $100,000 and are intended to benefit five or more future accounting periods. The Commission has been advised by bond counsel that formal approval of the budget by resolution of each of the participating political subdivisions would be appropriate. The capital expenditure list also requires formal approval. I will be pleased to respond to any questions or comments that you may have with regard to this matter. On behalf of the Commission, thank you very much for your help and cooperation. Very truly yours, JLS:csp Enclosures Jacqueline L. Shuck Executive Director cc: Chairman and Members, Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk, Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Paul M. Mahoney, Roanoke County Attorney Mark Allan Williams, General Counsel, Roanoke Regional Airport Commission csp020196.h CommUeUer PEB-14-1996 16 39 RGA REGIGhJAL AIRPGRT CG~~IM 7035634838 P.03i05 oe-Fab-se AT'T'ACHMENT 1 ~-3 R R I NAL MMI I FQR YEAR 1996-97 BUDDET 1995.96 Budgeted 1998-97 Budgeted DCPENSE BUDC3ET Expend'dures itures 1. aerations and Maintenance Expenses A. Salaries, Wagea and 8eneirits 51,610,850 31,698,021 e. Operating Expendkureg 1,833,310 1,518,760 C. Other Projects 48,500 40,000 Total Operations and Maintenance 3,492,660 3,454,781 2. Non-Operating Expenses A. interest 555,571 542,616 B. Debt Senrice 273,228 289,677 Total Non-Opered'mg 828,797 832,293 3. Capital Expertae r A. Capital Projects and Purchases 78,100 245,225 Tote! Capital Experwes 78,100 245,225 Tv1al Budgeted E~ - 64,399,557 54,732,299 1994.66 Projected 199697 Projected R~/ENUE PROJECTlON3 Revenues Raventass 1. Opermdng Revenues . A. Airfleki 6424,291 :977,738 B. General Avietbn 103,112 101,512 C, Terminal Re4eted 2,990,407 3,273,903 D. Other Revenues 213,718 225,790 Total Projeoted Operating Revenues 4,131,532 4,578,982 2 NonAperating Revanuee A lrtterest from Debt Service 28,000 40,000 e. Interest an Invsstrnor~ds 250,000 424,000 C. Roanoke Courriy Bea Service Fee 264,1!340 0 Total Projected Non-i~per~ding Aavertt~ee ~ 842,$40 465,000 Total Projected Revenue 54,674,172 X5,043,982 FE.-14-1996 16 40 ROA REGIONAL AIRPORT CGMM 7035634838 F.04i05 ATTACI~VIENT II -" ~~ Proposed Capital Expenditures (For projects expected to exceed $104,OQQ in cost and intended to benefit five or mare accounting periods) A. Projects 1. ?~!rchaLce and ~tLSt~~LF&C3a$ in Te Ln?l a.) Description: Purchase and install approximately 3300 square yards of carpeting as replacement for carpeting in public areas of the terminal building. b.) Justification: The carpeting in the public areas of the terminal building will Dave been in place for almost eight years at the end of the 1996-97 fiscal year. Heavy usage has caused it to wear out in some areas and reach the point where it ao longer can be satisfactorily cleaned. Estimated Cost: $150,400.00 2, C!nn~n~rtinr of Airfield M ia-nt~nce and ~'1d'n a.) ~-~' :Construct an airfield maintenance and storage building of sufficient size to store and maintain all snow removal and other airfield maintitnarvice equipment, vehicles a~ supplies, and to provide office, lockers and break room space for airfield maintenance personnel. b.) ~~~: Airfield asintenance personnel are housed in a 1944's building which is slated for deawlition. Some snow removal and other maintenance equipment is stored is a World Waz II quonset but which is largely unheated; the rest of the equipment and vehicles, and some supplies are stored outside without protection. In order to maintain and protect equipment, supplies and personnel, especially during snow events, an airfield maintenance and storage building is required. Estimated Cost: $1,400,000.00 B. F~uydiag Sources Federal A~ Grant Funds ~ State Aviation Grans Funds $1,004,000.00 Commission F~ 550,000.00 City ~aad County Ftimds Estimated Total Projects Funding $1,550,004.00 .~ ~FtB-14-1996 10 40 ROA REGIONAL AIRPORT ~Cf1M 7035634838 P.05/05 RESOLUTION OF THE ROANOKE REGIONAL AIRPORT COMhKISSION Adapted this 14th day of February 1996 No. oi-oZ1496 _ A RESOLUTION approving and adopting the Commission's Operating and Capital Purchase $udget for fiscal year 1996-97. BE IT RESOLVED by the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission that the fiscal year 1996-97 Operating and Capital Purchase Budget for the Commission as set forth in the report and accompanying attachment by the Executive Director datod February 14, 1996, is hereby approved; BE 1T FII~IALLY RESOLVED that the Eaocntive Director i9 authorized on behalf of the Commission to submit the fiscal year 199fr97 Operating and Capital Ptuchase Budget, as well as a List of Proposed Capital E~enditares, to the Roaaake City couueil and the'Roanolce Coanty Board of Supervisors for approval pursuant to the contract between the Commission, R cityy ana Roanoke county dated ranuary 2s, 1987. ATTEST: . ~ ,:~y: !. `'S lit)1~~l~lrf~/ ~,~ ._ ~ 1 ~ .tip • ~ >- ~ .~ `' ~ ~ '~ ,~~ ,.ti ~:r. ~ !. '! • , TOTAL P.05 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 27, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Approval of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Budget for Fiscal Year 1996-97. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: / ~j j ~: ~~ .~ , ~Cic.us~n.,ir.~d f'/~v~rri~, / ~.~1 ~f'~ia r~r-c,~ir~.~ rr~~, ~F BACKGROUND: The Roanoke Regional Airport Commission is required to submit their budget to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors and the Roanoke City Council for approval before it can be formally adopted by the Commission. At its meeting on February 14, 1996, the Commission approved the attached budget for fiscal year 1996-97 to be forwarded to the governing bodies of the two localities. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The 1996-97 budget for the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission shows revenues of $5,043,982 and expenditures of $4,732,299. This reflects that airport operations are self supporting and do not require any additional supplement from either the County or the City. The Commission also adopted the attached proposed capital expenditure budget program. The capital expenditures total $1,550,000. These expenditures will be funded with $1,000,000 of State Aviation Grant Funds and $550,000 of Commission Funds. FISCAL IMPACT: On June 30, 1996, the County will make its final payment of $264,640 which constitutes our original ten year contribution to the airport. There will not be any additional monies needed as a result of this budget. m:\finance\common\board\2-27-96.wpd February 22, 1996 -, ~ 3 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adopting the attached resolution approving the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission budget for the fiscal year 1996-97. SUBMITTED BY: Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance APPROVED: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To () Motion by No Eddy Harrison Johnson Minnix Nickens Yes Abs m:\finance\common\board\2-27-96.wpd February 22, 1996 1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 1996 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ROANOKE REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION BUDGET FOR FY 1996-97, UPON CERTAIN TERMS AND CONDITIONS WHEREAS, Section 24.B of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Act and Section 17.(a) of the contract between the City of Roanoke, Roanoke County, and the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission provide that the Commission shall prepare and submit its operating budget for the forthcoming fiscal year to the Board of Supervisors of the County and City Council of the City; and WHEREAS, by report dated February 14, 1996, a copy of which is on file in the office of the Clerk to the Board, the Chairman of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission has submitted a request that the County approve the FY 1996-97 budget of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia that the FY 1996-97 budget and proposed capital expenditures for the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission as set forth in the February 14, 1996, report of the Commission Chairman, a copy of which is incorporated by reference herein, is hereby APPROVED, and the County Administrator and the Clerk are authorized to execute and attest, respectively, on behalf of the County, any documentation, in form approved by the County Attorney, necessary to evidence said approval. m:\finance\common\board\2-27-96.wpd February 22, 1996 Bob L. Johnson, Chairman ' Kit B, Kiser, Vice Chairman Claude N. Smith James M. Turner, Jr. 0 Arthur M. Whittaker, Sr, Jacqueline L. Shuck, Executive Director Honorable Chairman and Members Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke, Virginia ~Raava~ 1[GU01 ~"'1L ar~oar Re: Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Fiscal Year 1996-97 Budget and Proposed Capital Expenditures Dear Gentlemen: In accordance with the requirements of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Act, and the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Contract dated January 28, 1987, submitted for your approval is the Airport Commission's 1996-97 proposed Operating and Capital Purchases Budget, as well as a separate listing of proposed capital expenditures which are expected to exceed $100,000 and are intended to benefit five or more future accounting periods. The Commission has been advised by bond counsel that formal approval of the budget by resolution of each of the participating political subdivisions would be appropriate. The capital expenditure list also requires formal approval. I will be pleased to respond to any questions or comments that you may have with regard to this matter. On behalf of the Commission, thank you very much for your help and cooperation. Very truly yours, Jacqueline L. Shuck Executive Director JLS:csp Enclosures cc: Chairman and Members, Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk, Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Paul M. Mahoney, Roanoke County Attorney Mark Allan Williams, General Counsel, Roanoke Regional Airport Commission 5202 Aviation Drive ~~~ Roanoke, Virginia 2401 2-1 1 48 (540) 362-1999 FAX (540) 563-4838 csp020196.h Comm\letter FEB-14-1996 1639 ROA RErIOhJ~L AIRPORT C~]I~iM ~~35634838 P.~3i05 08-Feb•96 ATTACHMENT I ~~~ R I NAL MMI I FqR YEAR 1996-g7 BUI~DET 1995-9fi Budgeted 1996-97 Budgeted EXPENSE BUQC3E"f Expend'dures itures 1. Operatians.and Maintenance Expenses A. Salaries, Wages and Benefits ~ 51,610,550 X1,698,021 B. Operating Expendhures 1,833,310 1,818,760 tW. Other Projects 48,500 40,000 Total Operations and Maintenance 3,492,880 3,fi54,781 2. Non-Operating Expenses A. Interest 555,571 542,616 B. Debt Service 273,226 289,677 Total Non-Operafa~g 828,797 832,293 3. Capital Expenses r A Capital Projects and Purchases 78,1ao 245,225 Total Capital Expenses 78,1 ~ 245,225 Total Budgeted !~xpenditures 34,398,557 54,732,299 1995-A6 Projected 4996-97 Projected REVENUE PRQlECT1aNS Revenues Revenues 1. Operating Revenues . A, Airfield X824,295 3977,738 8. General Avletion 103,112 101,552 C. Terminal Related ~ 2,980,407 3,273,903 D. Other Revenues 213,718 725,790 Total Projected Operating Revenues 4,131,532 4,578,982 2. Nan-Operming Revenues A Interest from Debt Service 28,000 40,000 e. Interest on irnestmsrrta 250,000 425,000 C. Roanoke County Bass Servlce Fee 264,40 0 Total Projected N~ Ravatxies ~ 542,640 465,000 Total Projected Revenue 54,674,172 ;~5,OA3,982 FEB-14-1996 16 40 ROA REGIONAL fiIRPORT COMM 7035634838 P.04!05 ATTeA,CHMENT II "'" "~' ~~ proposed Capital Expenditures {For projects expected to e~zceed $100,000 in cost and intended to benefit five or more accounting periods) A. Projects 1, Pnrc ~ ~ and Yns~all„C,alpet~n. iri Termi~l_ a.) D~ tion: Purchase and install approximately 3300 square yards of carpeting as replacement for carpeting in public areas of the terminal building. b.) Justification: The carpeting in the public areas of the terminal building will have been iA place for almost eight years at the end of the 1996-97 fiscal year. Heavy usage has caused it to wear out in some areas and reach the point where it ao longer can be satisfactorily cleaned. FstimaGed Cost: $150,400.00 2. f''n.,a!~~rt;nn of O;r~ei_d M inLri~flCp a~,y~y~oiag~ $u'1dLg a,) ~: Construct an airfield maintenance and storage building of sufficient size to store and maintain all snow removal and other airfield maintenance equipment, vehicles and supplies, and to provide office, lockers and break room space for airfield maintenance personnel. b.} titis~ti4n: Airfield maintenance personnel are housed in a 1940's building which is slated for demolition. Some snow removal and other maintenance equipment is stored in a World War II quonset but which is largely unheated; the rest of the equipment and vehicles, and some supplies are stored outside without protection. In order to maintain and protect equipment, supplies and personnel, especially during snow events, an airfield maintenance and storage building is required. Estimated Cost: $1,400,000.00 B. Fttndittg Sources Federal AIP Grant Funds `~" State Aviation Cxrant Funds $1.,000,000.00 Commission Funds 550,000.00 City and County Funds ---~~ Estimated Total Projects Funding $1,550,000.00 dp(~+0996.b C.oosml~.6~ .• FEB-14-1996 16 40 ROA REGIONAL AIRPORT COMM RESOLUTION OF 'THE ItOANOKE REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION Adopted this 14th day of February i996 Na, 01-021495.. A RESOLUTION approving and adopting the Commission's Operating and Capital Purchase $udget for fiscal year 1996-97. BE IT RESOL'V'ED by tlsc Roanoke Regional Airport Commission that the 5sca1 year 1995-97 Operating and Capital Purchase Budget for tt~c Commission as set forth in the report and accom~panyiug attachment by the Executive Director dated February 14, 1996, is hereby approved; BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Eatet~ive Director is auti~arize~d on behalf of the Commission to submit the fiscal year 1996-97 Operating and Capital Purchase Budget, as well as a list of Proposed Capital Expenditures, to the Roauoloe City Council and the'R~osaoke County Board of Supervisors for approval pursuant to the contract between the Commission, Roanoke City and Ytoanoloe Cotuaty dated January 28, i9$7. ATTB3T: .+~ ~ 1 ~ `~~ ~~i !. 1 • , ~~ S 1~~ ~~~~ y~~~~,~~~~. .. ~~ .,,.., r. 7035634838 P.O5~05 TOTAL P.05 4 A-022796-4 ACTION N0. ITEM N0. G"-7 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 27, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Request for approval of a proposed cost apportionment for the Roanoke County - Botetourt County Joint Library. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: uJ~'f{~ (JU~C~O(crf ~trECn'~'~ an aJ j?rr~o,~c~t~ ~(c t. ~ ~. ~~ i S A.. n E X C F- ~~en 7~ D ar ~n r r s Ji .P ~~~eJ Se~rv,"t t. f"U a/~e%a~S / "~ ~~~(` EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: As required by the contract governing the Joint Library, the Joint Library Committee has collected and analyzed data on usage of the facility by citizens of the two counties. Based on the committee's findings, it is recommended that the cost allocation remain unchanged, with Roanoke County responsible for 250 of the costs. BACKGROUND: The original terms of the Joint Library contract established a 50o cost sharing arrangement between the two localities. Following the 1990 surveys and measures, Roanoke County's share was reduced to 25 o based on the relative usage level of the facility. In 1993 the contract governing the Joint Library was amended to allow for cost allocation adjustments every five years instead of once every decade. The cost allocation which is determined at this time will be applied for fiscal years 1996/1997 through 2000/2001. According to the terms of the contract, the next series of surveys will be conducted in calendar year 2000, with any adjustments in the cost allocations to be instituted in FY 2001/2002. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The 1986 contract establishing the Roanoke County - Botetourt County Joint Library contains provisions for the periodic assessment of library use levels by citizens of the respective counties and consequent adjustment of the allocation of costs between the two localities. Although originally established as a decennial process, the contract was amended in 1993 to allow for an adjustment every five years. The Joint Library Committee, as directed by the contract, has measured the use of the Library during a four week period in October and November 1995. Sampling and survey methodologies which were utilized in 1990 were found to be satisfactory and were employed again. Based on a sample of 532 library users, the surveys indicated that 74.25% of the users were ..~' ~~~ Botetourt County residents, and 25.750 were citizens of Roanoke County. Based on these results, which are very similar to the figures obtained from the 1990 survey, the Joint Library Committee recommends that there be no change in the allocation of costs, with Roanoke County's share remaining at 25%. As outlined in the contract, the Board of Trustees have reviewed this finding and endorse the recommendation. The Trustees and the staff present this information to the Board of Supervisors for their consideration and action. The Board must formally approve the allocation rate which will be applied in FY 96/97 and the four following fiscal years. FISCAL IMPACT: The recommended allocation for cost sharing remains unchanged from the rate used since FY 91/92. This should keep adjustments in the County's financial obligation to the Joint Library relatively low over the next five years. ALTERNATIVES: The Board could request additional study of use levels prior to adopting an allocation rate. Staff thinks it is unlikely that such extended study would indicate any change. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the recommendation of the Joint Library Committee and the Board of Trustees, and approve an allocation rate of 250 for the next five fiscal years. Respectfully submitted, G ~~ Spence Watts Library Director Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Approved by, ~~ ~ ~ ~~, Elmer C. d e County Administrator ACTION Motion by: Motion by Bob L. Johnson to approve staff recommendation VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy x Harrison x Johnson x Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Spencer Watts, Library Director Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance ACTION NO. ITEM NO. -~- ~-3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 27, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Requests for Public Hearing and First Reading for Rezoning Ordinances Consent Agenda COUNTY ADMqINISTRA/TOR' S COMMENT,~S ~ECC~~/~mPnd A`r~JIC.~~r( C'~ F,~'dr ~cc.-c/~ ~ ~~ ~fs~nnnct~ BACKGROUND• The first reading on these ordinances is accomplished by adoption of these ordinances in the manner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions, rather approval satisfies the procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public hearing and second reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public hearing on these ordinances is scheduled for March 26, 1996. The titles of these ordinances are as follows: 1) An ordinance to rezone 315+ acres from R-1, AG-1, and AR to PRD, planned residential development to construct residential homes and commercial services, located on Cotton Hill Road, east and west of the Blue Ridge Parkway, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Boone, Boone & Loeb, Inc. 2) An ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to expand the existing church and school facilities, located on Williamson Road across from Brookside Shopping Center, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Shenandoah Baptist Church. 3) An ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to expand an existing manufactured home park, located at 5188 Yellow Mountain Road, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of Mountain Investors Corp. MAPS ARE ATTACHED; MORE DETAILED INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE IN THE CLERR~S OFFICE. ..~ /- 3 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: (1) That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of these rezoning ordinances for the purpose of scheduling the second reading and public hearing for March 26, 1996. (2) That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth as Items 1 through 3, inclusive, and that the Clerk is authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action. Respectfully submitted, ~~~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Vote No Yes Abs Eddy Harrison Johnson Minnix Nickens ~! MEMORANDUM DATE: February 22, 1996 TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Janet Scheid, Planner RE: Len Boone Proposed Development - Wilshire Planned Residential Development Attached please find a copy of the application for this proposed rezoning. The entire rezoning package, titled Wilshire, was distributed to you earlier this winter. If you are not able to find this information, please give me a call (772-2094) and I will make sure you get another copy. Thanks. COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P:O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 For staff use on/y „_~^ date received: received by: application fee: PC/B2A date: placards issued: BOS date: Case Number: •~ ••~~ aNN~~~auon complete! rlease check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v '~ ws v ws v Consultation 8 1 /2" x 1 1 " concept plan Application fee _ Application ~~ Metes and bounds description ~~~:~ Proffers, if applicable Justification ~'. Water and sewer application Adioininn nor,non., ,,,...,..... /hereby certify that / am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the know/edge and consent of the owner. Owner's Signature: See Attached I 1.a. ~ ~ . Auptication of Rezonin~Q- Owner's name and address: (the following are various owners of records as well as contractual owners) Nicholas H. Beasley and Susan Beasley ' 5949 Coleman Rd., SW Roanoke, VA 24018 703-774-0204 Boone, Boone & Loeb, Inc. P. O. Box 8156 t Roanoke, VA 24014 703-772-3887 t i Palm Land Company, L.C. P. O. Box 8156 Roanoke, VA 24014 703-772-3887 Cotton Hill Land Company, L.C. P. O. Box 8156 Roanoke, VA 24014 703-772-3887 Location of Proaerty: PRD Property located on the north side of the Blue Ridge Parkway is accessed from Cotton Idill Road onto Monet Drive and begins at the end of `°The Gardens of Cotton Idill" Subdivision. Tax Map Numbers: 96.07-6-16 thru 22, 96.07-4-1 and 2, 96.07-5-3, 96-07-5-5 thru 15, 96.07-7-1 thru 12, 96.07-7-14 thru 17, 96.07-1-6, the northerly portion of 96.02-01-46 (all of this property that is on the north side of the Blue Ridge Parkway). Note: Any individual lot of the above mentioned tax numbers at time of rezoning approval that has been deeded to a third party which is not a party to this zoning application shall be excluded from the properties included in the final approval of this rezoning request. Magisterial District: Cave Spring Magisterial District PRD Property located on south side of the Blue Ridge Parkway accesses directly off Cotton II'ill Road, with a portion of the property fronting on Cotton Hill Road. Tax map numbers are 96.02-01-01, 96.02-01-02, 97.03-02-05, the southerly portion of 97.01-02- 17 (all of this property that is on the south side of the Blue Ridge Parkway), and the southerly portion of 96.02-01-46 (all of this property that is on the south side of the Blue Ridge Parkway) Magisterial District: Cave Spring Magisterial District ~° 1.b. Existing Zoning: All property located on the north side of the Blue Ridge Parkway, is currently zoned R 1, with conditions, with the exception of approximately 8 acres which is zoned AG 1 with conditions. All property located on the south side of the Blue Ridge Parkway, is currently zoned AR with the exception of approximately 12-15 acres, which is zoned AG 1. Existing Land Uses• Property located on the north side of the Blue Ridge Parkway: approximately 13 acres have been subdivided into residential lots and the balance of the land is mostly being used for agricultural purposes. Property located on the south side of the Blue Ridge Parkway: a small portion of the property is currently being used to graze cattle and the balance of it is wooded with no current use. We hereby certify that the following individuals or entities own or have a contractual interest in the property listed in this application and are requesting that it be rezoned as a PRD with the att hed proferred conditions. :~J..~ a. Nic ~ H. Beasley f C~t.~ ~ • L7Q-QS Susan Beasley Boo Loeb, Inc. b r , P ompany, L.C. Co n and Compaany, L.C. b ~ `' G~tivi s~ 1.c. " ROANOKE COUNTY • UTILITY DEPARTMENT ~A- ii ii i~ ii Name of Developer: Boone, Boone & Loeb, Inc. APPLICATION FOR WATER OR SEWER SERVICE TO PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Date: September 1, 1995 Name of Applicant : Boone, Boone & Loeb, Inc. Phone: 772-3887 Address of Applicant: P.O. Box 8156, Roanoke, VA 24014 Phone: 772-3887 Address of Developer: P. O. Box 8156, Roanoke, VA 24014 i~ Name of Developer: Palm Land Company, L.C. Phone: 772-3887 Address of Developer: P. O. Box 8156, Roanoke, VA 24014 Name of Developer: Cotton Bill Land Company, L.C. Address of Developer: P. O. Box 8156, Roanoke, VA 24014 Name of Design Engineer: Lumsden Associates Phone: 772-3887 Phone: 774-4411 Address of Design Engineer: 4664 Brambleton Ave., S.W., Roanoke, VA 24018 Name of Contact Person: Len Boone Name of Proposed Development: Wilshire Type of Development and proposed number of units: Planned Residential Development (PRD) with up to 1102 residences comprised of single family detached, zero lot line houses, cluster homes (detached and two unit homes), townhouse, apartments and condominiums with 5.5 acres of Community Services. Location of proposed development: Southwest Roanoke County off Monet Drive and Cotton Ill Road Size of proposed development in acres: 315 Acres Give minimum and maximum elevation (Use USGS Elevations) at which the individual water/sewer service connections would be located: Minimum 1200 feet MSL. Maximum 1590 feet MSL Is this application for a development that will be a part or section of a larger future development? X No Yes Signature of Applicant 1.d. p d ~ ~ «~ yy f~Y' ~ 1 ~ ";:~ ' ~.; ,~4 ~u ~~~~ i~i urn V. ~. uO ` S~JY~ 1 ~£ ';' ;~~ ~ ;~~` j y YSys •~~•~ ~ ~f„ ,• ', ,57 %~v5 7 i ~L] n a ',~ ~' .~ ~.~ ''' ~~ V` ~ `'~':~. ^ + ~ a ~ ~ '=~ i r' ~ -. '~ ~? .._ \ ~~ i - ~~ ~ _ ~ ,= . ~, s~ - ~ ~ . ~ ~ ` ~ ~ ~ i~~ 4 1 ~~ _.~ .. .s~, ._ ~ ,~, g Y ~^ t1 t ..p ~, ~ ~ . l 4q ~ 9 ~ 6 ~ z a a. 1 111 per(! J OBI _ „ ~OUI ~ ~ - _ e W ~ ~ ' ~ ~ 'i ~'~ . _ f ~,. i ~_ ~ 7 Y Y Y b 7 Y g = _ ~ ~ ~ ° ° .. ~ ~ 9 ~ 6 6 Y . ? i s~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~9 ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~3 ~7~~i~i~~~~ a ° ®~®~®oe ~~~ J L 3 2 ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y~ f ~ ~~ ~» ~ y z O I z W U'.< O ~ o Q ==~ o z ~ z co +~ ~.ooc•.i ~~rn /~ 1 ~' ,III ~ i i. 'I III I I iI ~i i~ } o ~I 3 ~ ~~ ~ ~ 4 - o r ~\ r ~1 Y Y L 6 I ~~ ~ z ~~ .+ COUNTY OF ROANOKE ,,,~'~ ~or stafT DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW _ _ P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA_ 24018 (703) 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 date received: received by: .~/ ~ (° Q ~ ~ (Y' application fe~e~~ ~t PClBZA d~te~ ~ placards is~ sed: ~ BOS dat~ ~}~ Case Number: r ~ Check type of application filed (check all that apply): ^ REZONING ®SPECIAL USE ^ VARIANCE Applicant's name: Balzer & Associates Inc Attn: Pat Miley Phone: 772-9580 Address: 1208 Corporate Circle Zip Code: 24018 Owner's name: Shenandoah Baptist Church Attn: Don Bivens Phone: 366-2431 Address:6520 Williamson Road NW Zip Code: Roanoke VA 24019 Location of propery: Tax Map Number: x•18-1-3; 27.18-1-11, 27.12-1-12 a Willi on Road across from ksi Magisterial District:f-bl]ir~s I~a~iGt Pr-ial )~~ Broo de Shopping Center Community Planning Area: hers ~~ ~~tY P Size of parce! (s}: Existing Zoning: R1. (13xic3~t-ia1 - Ira Doty) 18,58 acres Existing Land Use: ~Z ~1~~~~ •lity Fi09~i44 sq.ft. :~: Proposed Zoning: For StaN Use On/y Proposed Land Use: ~ ~ rJ t~ ~~-~, mil, ~d ~Y~~) Use Type: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES ~ NO 1F NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES x NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO ~;;:;:: f. Variance of Section(s) of thE< Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please-check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT 6E ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v ws v as v x Consultation 8 1 /2" x 1 1" concept plan x Application fee x Application ~~~~'~: Metes and bounds description x -'~< Proffers, if applicable - x Justification x ~'<"~> LVater and sewer application x Adjoining property owners l hereby certify that / am either the o ner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowle ~ consent of the owner. Owner's Signature: . ~/z9/~~ ~-- ,/z,/4 use only ""~ n""~' z~ ATTACHMENT A The project furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance in that the Master Plan improves access and internal circulations at the existing facility. The relocated entrance on Plymouth Drive is intended to reduce Church and School traffic through the adjoining neighborhood. -The Master Plan enhances the appearance and convenience of use of the site while maintaining adequate provisions for fire and safety access. The stated purpose of the R-1 Zone is to protect the residential neighborhoods from .potentially incompatible uses in order to maintain the health, safety, appearance and overall quality of life of existing and future neighborhoods. The purpose specifically mentions schools and other similar neighborhood activities as compatible uses. The project is an expansion of the existing Day Care Center, Primary/Secondary Educational Facilities and Religious Assembly, and is, therefore, allowed in the R-1 Zone by Special Use Permit. All setbacks, height and coverage requirements will be met by the new facilities. The plans include provisions for improving parking areas to bring them into conformance with current standards, including interior landscaping. In addition, screening and buffering in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance will be implemented. T~ ATTACHMENT B The property is in the Development Land Use Designation, and is adequately seared by water and sewer and major street access. The Development Land Use Types include Community Activity Centers, such as schools and churches, which serve the neighboring residents' needs. The project includes the expansion of church and school facilities to serve a growing congregation, as well as senior and youth centers. ~r ATTACHMENT C If implemented, the Master Plan will improve pedestrian and vehicular access to and circulation within the site. The appearance of the property will improve due to landscaping, site lighting and improvements to structures. Temporary structures and some permanent structures will be removed and replaced with new ones designed more efficiently and placed more conveniently on the site. Parking lots will be brought into conformance with the current ordinance. Stormwater management measures will be designed and implemented. Overcrowding of school facilities and congestion on the site will be reduced. Members of the congregation will enjoy the use of an expanded Worship Center and a new Senior and Youth Center. Adjoining properties will enjoy increased screening and buffering on the site. Church and School traffic through Plymouth Drive will be reduced due to the location of a new entrance near Williamson Road. Traffic and utilities use is not expected to increase dramatically as the expansion is desired to handle an existing need as well as normal projected growth of the Church and School. u , ~ 7 $~~ 2 _ `-- ~ g ~ ~ 6 ~ ~ x . ~ ~ ~ 5 g ~ i 6 - .. '~ m1 .. S -_ ~ - // ~~}` ~ N~ . ~ I - ~ .. ~'.' .. i %~ ~ ~~ ~ 1 . ~, _ ,_,, 1 - x ~. ~~ - l - $ 6' 1. a ~ I 1 1` ~ 3 ,5 I~ ~ 7 ~ ~ 21 ` gg9' 2 18 ~ ` ~ \ ~ ~ ' ~~ iii I ,g8 ~ \~ \ ± ~ ~f /_ ~a ,/ ~ ~ ~ \. t .. ~ ~' ~jJ' O ~~ ` I 11 5 ~~ 1 ~ ~ . ~ ~\ -- ~ ', ~ '~~ h 1 ' q, / ~ 1 I ~ 0 , ~ ~ .~ oi.. ~ - ~~ _ _ ~ ~. lid ~- ~ 13 _ ~ _.~. \ ~ - ~~ ~ ;. _ ~ ~ Y op 700. _. '~ _ 1 ~ _ ~ ~ B _23 .. ` - ~, - O ~.~ - . ~ . ~ SHENANA~AX APT/ST M/Nls: i /~_~ 5~~- ~ ~ -~: ~~___ ~ ,C - .~ ..` scacF: fir, z~,* ~ . _ _ _94230 J `„ ~ 3 ~ ~ .. s ~ .y xo s i ~ .t~ ~ . .~ - 4 q ~Y~'..t 3`1 .y` T ~ X. 9 . , ~ - ~ 3. .'~, 5 6 _ 6 \ _ . , c` ~ ...2 ` \ , `'' 9~ ~ ~ .-. ~ . ,_ l . , -- i ~~.. ,. .s ~ I ~ 2, , - 2 8 ~1 Bg9 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ - ;~ ~6 \9 .. 1 '~ 18 ~ 1 6 / `~ O 1 5 ~'~ / . 19 ti / ~ ~ ~ //~ 187 ~ 2 0 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ r~ ~ 3 4 _ 1 - ~~~~/ 0 1 _ c, Q e ~ ~~~ /~I ~- ~© - o~ ~~, -ate v 3 i ~• r /..s. ~ ~ ~ ~ ' '.. .' _ tY ~a O. .. _1 1 ~~. .. - ~ .~ _ - ~~g8g, 24 ,. k .. ~ .~' ~ 1 ' ,,, '._ -~ ~ O ~~ ~ Sf{EI1li~ND~gh~ ~OI~ST 0~5. ~ - ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ WATER __ - ~p- -` ~4=89-302 \ - ~-- .- - - ~ -4-B9-182 9-305 0_ o ~~, f--~ '~---' i ' p 1 _ ~ ~'`-- -- 5d \ ' 4-89-301 / ~~, 4., ~ , ~•\ ~\ .~\, ~~ ---- 4_ 9-165 ~ 5 6,4 13 \ ,~ \ ~• ~ ~ 4.89-2 9 ~~4~-89-179 1 1 e 15 o -89300 ~o\ • ~ 9 -3 0 6 \ `~ '. \ ~. i, ~ _~, ` ~ , ~ 'r - ~ i / -~ y - l -69307 ;~ ~ 5 6 _ u~ ~ '~ ~ '~• l Z` `9 2 ,8 1~ ~ ~~ ~______ I ~ ~ ~9 1, •. 1 0 s y ~ r I fj~~ ' 4 -89=163 -B9-1 7 ~ r 6i , - ` O • ~ S .~ -'' ~ ' 4-69- ~ I' ~~~~ ' ~a -• 'S i . - ~ •~ ~ ' 4.98• 8. '~ ~'>, ~ 489-294:~- S ~ / ,~ a4-69-17,fi• 2 0 a ~ \ ~ ,~ ~ ~ ~, ~ 3 - .. _ ` ~ a v ~ 1 4 B9.2975 ~ ! ~ a ~ ., . i, 0`~/ ~ ~ Q~~ 4-89-296 1 1 ~ ~ ( ,o ti ~. 1 `\ . •~ G 4-69-161 ~ ~ --2 ~ -- --- _~ - --~ 4 'B 9-174 _ - . - i / ~p ~ -~~` i ~` T R O q p ~' 4-89-2b6 ~~ •/OZS` ` y i \ e ''~ l~ `~ b. o ~/ b M. "!-,~ 15' 48 257 `~ `•~ ~ -25 ~ ~ \ ` 4~B~-173 4-89 4~ i '•. ;'. - - 0 Z ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~/ SHENAND~<1 N ~APTlST - - . /,ZS~ ~, ~ v n O 3 _ 4 8968' ~ _ --` 'V ~'` _REF~12El~GE : f3B ~] _ U ~s G ± ~ jet ~.. t_9 ~ Y ;d~ ~ H ~ h ~+~ B~ a :. j3~ - ~'; .. ~. ~ _ .. ., :. ~• ~. . _ .. J.. ..:_., ~ . ~ __L - .~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ • • .+ } ~ 4 = ~ \ ~'~~' 3 .... .. a ,. d. ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ .. ~"~ - ;,,~ a , .~~: t. ,: . +,i • ~ ~. .. r d! ~I~ u F.~ a -~: - ~== Z r-P• ~'x~ ~ .~ _ ` K •".' 'n ~. `.~,~ ('tea:} i._ _ • - ~ w may: ! ,e ' P:."~` P 'Z~` pD S; ~ ; ` ,~. 21 7t ey ~ ,[,, ~• • • \~._` Q V 0 U O a 0 C Y a= r s u 1 ~ e ~ m s 0 e e s w la H H a w OI US W ~ o e i `. . i ~Y~ ~'_ C ~} i ~~ ~.~-~.~, ~SHENANDOAH B:~PTIST CHURCH ROBERT L..~.LDER\I.~\ Pastor January 26, 1996 Dear Neighbors of Shenandoah Baptist Church, The Shenandoah Baptist Church has applied for a special use permit for additional development and slight changes in the land usage of the Shenandoah Baptist Church. In the interest of neighborly relationships, I would like to have the opportunity of responding to any questions or concerns you may have with reference to the application. Accordingly, we are setting aside Monday evening, February 19, and Thursday evening, February 22, for an open house discussion on these matters at 7:00 p.m. Our agenda will be identical at both meetings but various questions or comments at the two meetings may be different. Should you have any interest in such a meeting, I want you to know of my personal invitation for you to attend either one of these sessions. We will be meeting in room S-1 of the secondary building which is located adjacent to our gymnasium. If you have any concerns you would like to discuss with me before either of these meetings, please do not hesitate to call me. I would be happy to hear from you. Sincerely, ~ I f'1 ' Robert L. Alderman RLA: tj 6520 ~~"il!iamson Road. N.~V. • P.O. Box 70!0 • Roanoke. Virginia 2-1019 • Telephone (510) 366-2131 • F.~ti (5101 =63-2351 ~ ~ NORTH K ,. 4 ,n, ~' .~ .O ey • •a ... a • -----0 1 - 7 _• ,,-- ~ .,...- ~/ _ , , .., ,,- , ~ ~,.- _ ~ T ., . •S ~ r , !~. ' A ~ ~ ~' / ~ - ~ y. r A M=me .. ~ s w / . ~ ~ ~ ~~ .` / ~' G _ . ~ w. ~ t .. ; i ~ ~, . 1 ~p ai " ~~ , V 1 /_ G _ t^f ~ '.- ~ ~ ' j `• / ~ a....... o. e Y / ~ MM p ~ ~ j .~ ~. J _ ~' = DEPAR'I.43VT OF PLP.NNIr'G SPECIAL USE PERMIT " PND ZOr1ING - 27.18-1-3; -11; 12 •'' 27.18-2-1; ~10; 11; 17.; 18; 19 .,. O ROANp,~.~ z.A ~ ~ C~~~~~ ~a~ ~~x~.~a.~.~e ~ 2 v a~ UTILITY DEPARTMENT 1838 `~' September 28, 1995 Shenandoah Baptist Church 6520 Williamson Road Roanoke, VA 24019 c~, RE: Availability No. 95-190 Plymouth Drive Tax Map No. 27.18-1-15 Water/Sewer Dear Sir/Madam: Public water is available to this property located along Plymouth Drive, Tax Map No. 27.18-1-15. This property is currently served by public sewer. Public water can be provided by a service connection to the eight inch water line located along Plymouth Drive adjacent to this property. At the point of connection, the water pressure would be approximately 80 pounds per square inch (psi). Your plumber should adhere to the plumbing code requirements relative to pressure. The off-site facility fee is $2,690.00 and the basic connection fee is $500.00. The total connection fee is $3,190.00 per residential connection. The fee includes the connection to the main, meter box, setter and water meter at the property line. It is your responsibility to install the service lateral from the meter to the building under the provisions of the plumbing code. If the owner wants to proceed with this services, please make application and pay the appropriate fees at the Building Permit Office in the Roanoke County Administration Center at 5204 Bernard Drive. You should also install a stake labeled "water meter" at the desired location of the water meter. If the proposed meter location is not marked, the County will install the meter at their discretion. This letter and stated fees are valid to October 1, 1996. You must submit another application for water and sewer service if you plan to use this property for other than residential type usage. 1206 KESSLER MILL ROAD • SALEM, VIRGINIA 241 53 • (540) 387-6104 ® Printed on Recycled Paper ~~ er 28, 1995 fd TWO ,- z Ig you have any questions or need additional clarification~of the above information, please contact me at 387-6102. Sincerely, i Robert C. Fronk, P.E. Utility Engineer RCF/sgh pc: Arnold Covey Engineering & Inspections 1 COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW _ . _ _ _ _ _ P.O. Box 29800 - _ Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 ,~ '~"', For s'f•aff use only ~~Q '/Z4~'~ `~~ date received: ~ ~,~.~J - U, received by: ~,{/ - application fee~j~~~ ^, PC/BZA date:~~ ~ placard issued•~ `~ 7 BOS date: ~ ~rG~ Case Number: -, Check type of application filed (check all that apply): ^ REZONING C~ SPECIAL USE ^VARIANCE Applicant's name: Balzer & Associates, Inc. ATTN: Pats Miley Phone: 772-9580 Address: 1208 Corporate Ci[:rcle, Roanoke VA Zip Code: 24018 Owner's name: Mountain Investors, Corporation Phone: 776-6901 Address: PO Box 200453 Roanoke, VA Zip Code: 24018 Location of property: ~L~~~ D Tax Map Number: 89 01 1 - - . Yellow Mountain Road Rte 668 Magisterial District: Vinton Community Planning Area: Mt. Pleasant Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: 1 1 _5RR acres AR-MH OVERLAY (AGRICULTURAL - MANUFACTURID HOME) Existing Land Use: sq.ft. MADIUFAC'P[JRED HOME PARK (1$ Units) . PropOSed ZOn(ng: ~ _ ~ - For Staff Use Only Proposed Land Use: Use Type: MP~I~[F~ED HIE PA~3C (4-`( Units) Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES x NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES X NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO #~: ............................ Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. rvs v ws v ws v Consultation x 8 1 /2" x 1 1" concept plan x Application fee x Application X ~<'`~< Metes and bounds descri lion ~:~,; <~~. p Proffers, if applicable x.., K Justification X 'U Water and sewer application X Adjoining property owners /hereby certify that l am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and onsent of the owner \,.,,,- I _ Owner's Signature: ~N,~r~~~,vlt ~ /n ~-1-I`2s _1.~... ~/~'/Il _~A /l~ C~~f~ . , Foi StaN Use Only: Case Number Applicant Balzer and Associates Inc. ~~~ The Planning Cflmmission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the. need-and -- justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 3Q-3) as.well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. The expanded manufactured home park would provide for adequate light, air, convenience of access, and safety from fire, flood, and would create a convenient, attractive and harmonious community. The request increases the availability of affordable housing while providing adequate utilities, recreational facilities,. and parking.. The site conforms to all the requirements of the R-MH zone. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. Although the subject property is designated as Rural Preserve in the Comprehensive Plan, it is currently zoned for and used as a Manufactured Home Park. The project •provides expanded opportunities for affordable housing in~an attractive community with recreational facilities. The existing woodlands will~~be preserved in a buffer around the perimeter of the project, and individual lots will also preserve trees where possible. Please describe the impact(s) of the request cn the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. Initial expansion would add 15 units to the existing 18 units. All units would be served by private water and septic systems. A licensed soils scientist has determined that soils are adequate for 15 homes. When the County extends public sewer to the site, an additional 16 units would be added. Yellow Mountain Road would experience some additional traffic. Adequate fire and rescue access is provided in both expansion phases. Current residents of the park would enjoy expanded recreational facilities, and new laundry facilities. Additional properties would. be buffered by natural vegetation supplemented by planted trees. - ROAHOZCE COUNTY ""'~'~~ DTILITY DEPARTMENT „~L APPLICATION FOR WATER OR SEWER SERVICE _ _ TO _ PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT - Date Name of A licant Balzer ~ Associates, Inc. PP „~~`~ ~3J:~ez Phone 772-9580 Address of Applicant 1208 Corporate Circle, Roanoke VA 24018 Name of Developer Mountain Investors, Corp. phone 776-6901 Address of Developer pp Box 20453, Roanoke, VA 24018 Name of Design Engineer pat M;lA~, Phone 77a Q580 Address of -Design Engineer 1208 Corporate Circle, Roanoke VA 24018 Name of Contact Person mat M;1P~ Name of Proposed Development -- Type :of -Development and proposed number .of -units (Be specific) _- Mahc~~ac~~rc~ ~~ti,-~ ~a~ ~ : !~ ~xisF-rnq uni-~5 - - is ~!'1otSc ..~ CXPav~Sian Uni'~S l Co P(~t5c T~ ~ ~JaM.s t c1-, (~ ~ i -k'S 9 4q 1 ~ l v h i~{-5 Location of proposed development (FURNISH COPY OF I'ar,~ AND Pr~P.~VI~~TRIC ~~~~ER) v,,, , .,,, ~R ttnta~~-Read '-~~e-£-58 ` Size of proposed development in acres: 11.588 Acres Give minimum and maximum elevation (Use USGS Elevations) at which the individual water/sewer service connections would be located: Minimum 115 feet MSL. Maximum 125 feet MSL Is this application for a development that will be a part or section of a larger future development? x No Yes if yes, provide map of entire area if available. (ovEa) S' n ure o Applican t C~.;f ~' ~ v ~, ' ~ ~z ~''' ~ ;~_ 5 fL {i $ i L S 1 , 4 1 r ~, r a 4'_ .~ .~ _ ,k _ X. (f ~ 4 y i ~ _ J _ 1 ~~ x `ti ,\ C x ~' ~ 111 ~ f fL A,; ~ ~s{1 . ~ ~ ~ Y j V y ~ !,_ F SI` "~: 4~ Y ` .key ~ ~ _ ~, rt Y" z ~ ~' . ~ - } f} f J ~ 'r. ~.. x ~j .~: ~~ _ _ f _ _ J _ ~1 ~~ _ i e ~ ~ ~, ` _ ~,t 1 r 4 ~+.' _ C~..SC :~L .-. •,~ -. ~:`t•.. _t. ~-`~ ~:/ .' .~.Y~~s^'~, ,~t`7 is }`sS:.k.'fir`".'.`t` ~ '%s~E?212k'~y::__..l 2oo,uo k~ Cou,.~-ry ~.~tll M~T~.c c ~t ~'Q 'D~ : J~at , t o, t~t~ Ju: ~~ t~-7 ,~ r E ~ ~ { ~ ~ .- J ~ 4 T r I ~t } •` 4~ t-$ _~ `~yyyy t +. ~ ~ ]jY L ~ ~x ~z ~ j S _.Z '.~ tt ~ J I ~ ~ l~L f ~ J ~ ff L \ ti• S / ._[ ~~ = ~ e, : q n,v~~rrtn ;vvno~ ~rovrna * '- c' 3 . Z5 ~ i ; ~' . , - `, i t . NO/S~YYdX3 Y?IS'd 3lYDH ° t a _ ~, • • ~ i' 's °. iii ~ ~' ; Q3XlLLJ Y.31LYb'W 32II3'l~IIY,Lt~Il10fY m a q ~ "' ~~ . t' f 7 a i i 44 ~ ~~• 3• itl ~. :1: t: o o` c ~ N k I \ `Q - _ E> - - - - E ,•\ ~ Y ~ ~ ~ i` LR E _ .~ ~ ;_ !?~~i was y~+t ly1a~ ~( $!.y `~ $ ~ ~~ ~ ~ge` ~ s ~ = 4#~ •~~ ' ~ ~' . cv y ~.7F V~ ~ J '~ 7`S_~Ayy, `,_ Yq-sa `Cy _ _ y Ey3i O .a \~ ~~) ~; ~ ~ 1 K ~ _ ' T_ ~~ 4 ~ ~ >i! gyp., : ~ ` ; \ '~ ,\ 5. ~ ~;.~ YC~/~/.1 • ~ ~ ~~ `: ,. 9 \ ~ Y / ~C~~ 4~ fill rii .a ,-. vn ~ cox L i ~ ! ~ ~. ~ ~ /~F ~-2 -fit ~ \ a w" ao`~, ~ \ _ i ~R'~ 1 4 ) ` - _ '--------- ----- '` / ~i $ ~ c ~. i R ~ ' - -' 0 i, ... :. ~R. MN ~~ i ' ~ w». o' 1 i` q~~ ;L ~Q_ M t-~ '... ~, ~. ~~' •~~ •.' O ', f ~tt G ~_. P ,. _ ..~. .;~ ~{ a~ .... ~~, / 1JdOTurk~y td~ lu , e !!. ~. ~ 2.1 ~ :~., ~ ': t .89Ac ~w •3~ ~ V I.Ar sue' t ~ '~ w ~~`. 2 1J17 37.02 •Ac q.~ \ ...~ 1 ~~ • ,t 1 S.OAe „`\ n \ ~` a3:.. M =T~ ` ..:.~ SM Map 89.03 (~' ~. I~' 200 P ,~,~ ~>>~ ~~ usAs ~~ /' . A6 • Rood P "~o. 4 9 1332Ac 0 ~ ~~ R~ s ~~ ~~ ~9S \ 6~ sor~Cl 6 7 ~ Je 3t.1tAc 4.65 Ac O,s1r,~ g 9. $ ,~ ~~~ ' ~ l' ~ /~ G' "~ %~ - ~"' o i3 mo 118.45 AC ` i ~° ~ 250A. ~~ %~ - ~~ r e~ ~ t: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ._ , ~~ ~~ 9 AG~~ 4 SOACtD ~'~ I ~ I~ ( r ~ ' 7g9T Ac .. Sa~9 1` _i„{1 ~j V, 0 R cd O ,, S 00~ ~t~A -~- j ~ ~ 31 ` Q ~ 38.96ACll)1 ~ 13 ~ 04 41D1 671~c1U ~ / _~j% --~/ 47.62 Ac C) o"~ ' / i~'~J r zs ~ n o~ e/ y ~ ~" • ~ r.oo ~ 25 J/7! 22 54.66 ac 50oeiac r 25 ~~~_ .,. r 6sx Jz '* DEPARTMENT OF PLANNIA'G MOUNTAIN INVESTORS CORP. ~~ SPECIAL USE PERMIT AND ZONING 99.01-1-2.2~~ .~ •,~ - i :~ ' ~~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 1996 ORDINANCE 022796-5 FOR AUTHORIZATION TO ACQUIRE NECESSARY SEWER LINE EASEMENTB AND PROPERTY TO CONSTRUCT THE CARVINS CREEK SEWER INTERCEPTOR AND GLENVAR EABT SEWER MAIN WHEREAS, location plans for the Carvins Creek Sewer Interceptor and Glenvar East Sewer Main Projects have been completed and the projects will require acquisition of sewer line easements across certain properties; and WHEREAS, said easements are to be acquired to facilitate any future construction of the Carvins Creek Sewer Interceptor and Glenvar East Sewer Main Projects; and WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs that the acquisition of real estate be accomplished by ordinance; the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 13, 1996, and the second reading was held on February 27, 1996. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the acquisition and acceptance of the necessary sewer line easements for the Carvins Creek Sewer Interceptor and Glenvar East Sewer Main Projects are hereby authorized across the following properties, referenced by tax map number, from the following property owners, their successors or assigns: TA% MAP NO. PROPERTY OWNER Carvins Creek Sewer Interceptor 27.00-1-2 Hollins College Corporation 27.11-4-55 Jimmie R. & Dorothy P. Hollandsworth 1 27.16-1-1 Jeffrey E. & Melissa Ballard Glenvar East Sewer Main 55.13-1-3 Krueger Metal Products, Inc. 2. That the consideration for each easement acquisition shall not exceed a value equal to 40$ of the current tax assessment for the property to be acquired plus the cost of actual damages, if any; and 3. That the consideration for each easement shall be paid from the Sewer Repair and Replacement Fund; and 4. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish these acquisitions, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. lton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 2 ~- Y ~J ~ ,1 ~~ _i ~~ r u S ~^ .T ~1J ~j I~~' ~~ - ~ J ~~ ~'; T l '~ ~~~ ~\\ ~\~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~, '~ ~, ~ ~i y~ ;~ ~~ f= ~ N ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~~. ~ ~ ~ U ~ r O ', I~-/ W O LL ! ~l I~ ~ W IC``J ~^ J O -~ X00 ~c~z v~ x zQ J Z m`~~~ ~ z 1 ;~~-; ' ~l ~ ~ ~ C t- ~i ~ I~ W ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~___I 1 , iI ~ X \*' / ~ Q I- Y' ,~. ~~ ',~ ~~ ~` ' U ~~ ~ \ \ ',~ \ ~~ ~ _ '.> \ ~ ,Q \ ~ ~ ,U ~, \ \ / ~ ~~ ~,. i J~ / i 0 0 0 c 0 0 ~, o oQ r~ g c~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 a~ C w L~ I- z ~! W U'~ ~~ z~ ~I Q o Q Q a w ~ ~ ~ w m O cri ~ ~' Z w ~ Q _ ~ ~ ~; ~ w w W Q (n ~_ _ Z ~ Z g m Q "' .,.. `~~ ~~~~~ 3C0 200 10c0 ~ 100 =:~ 306 400 j ~ j' ~ ~ ~. ~~ ~ ~~- ~ ~ ~ ~` ~~~ ~~% s;r, ,;:'+~l ~~~~ 1 ,1 1~ ~~ \~\ 1\ `1 ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ / //', . ; ~/ i / ~ ~ ~. ~~ ~,,, ~ '~~ EASEMENT AREA '~~ I ~ ~, ~ ~ ~\ /, ,~ %" ~, '; / ~ PROPERTY OF ~ KRUEGER METAL PRODUCTS, INC. TAX NO. 55.1 3-01 - ~3 ,\ '~LEi~~1VAR -,SST ~~EWEP, M,~!N LANIMETRIC SHEET: CG2 =EBRUARY 6,1995 SAN. SEWER MAW TO BE REPLACED: ---- ~. R ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~/ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 27, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Second Reading of Ordinance -Authorization to Acquire Necessary Easements to Construct the Carvins Creek Sewer Interceptor and Glenvar East Sewer Main COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'/S COMMENT/S: RCCamMC?~ sJ' 0.OPlt>/r: ~ GT f~~ ~ f~c~ C.A~c~ U~ro/one+•~c(? , BACKGROUND: The Carvins Creek Sewer Interceptor and Glenvar East Sewer Main are sewer replacement projects being constructed as part of the Sewer Capital Improvement Program. These projects will involve acquisition of several easements in order to accommodate minor realignment of the sewer lines. Staff is including a location map and list of properties from which easements will be required. The first reading was held on February 13, 1996. The list of properties is as follows: TAX MAP NO. PROPERTY OWNER Carvins Creek Sewer Interceptor 27.00-01-02 Hollins College Corporation 27.11-04-55 Jimmie R. & Dorothy P. Hollandsworth 27.16-01-01 Jeffrey E. & Melissa Ballard Glenvar East Sewer Main 55.13-01-03 Krueger Metal Products, Inc. FISCAL IMPACT: The cost of easement acquisition is included as part of the overall project budgets. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt the ordinance after the second reading authorizing acquisition of easements at a cost not to exceed 40 % of the assessed value plus cost of actual damage to improvements as established by County assessment records or an appraiser retained by the County as needed for the Carvins Creek Sewer Interceptor and Glenvar East Sewer Main Projects. SUBMITTED BY: r Gary Robert n, P.E. Utility Director APPROVED: ~/~Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved () Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied O ~dY _ - - Received () Harrison _ Referred Johnson _ to Minnix _ _ _ Nickens r z I- ~; •~ 1^ i~ ~, ~-~~~ .~ ~- ~r~~0 ~ W~~x ~ ~~Q~~ o ~ _~ ~-- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j ~ O C`~~ I ~ T ~~~~' ~~ ~~~ , \~ ~~ ; . ~ ~~~ ~~ \_ ~~ '~~ ~z 0 ~ N , O ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~- O~ U ~ ~ W ~ ~~ ~~~ ,,~. ~ W C`~ 0 J i ~ 0 ~ ~~~ ~c~z v~ x ~~ 0 z \~ z O L~ ~ [Y r- i ~ 0 Q O ~~;' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~b ~~~ -- w~~~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ z ~ x Q ~- ~~ ~ ~ '..~ 0 ~~ ~ ° ~ ~ `~ o V ~ ~ \\~ ~~ ~ ~ \ ~,> o Q V` ~cY. v ', Q.. o U `~ ~/ o o 1 N `~ , o 0 M ~ ~ J I o o ~ ~ ~~ _- ~ ~ O ~-- I w ~ U o w \~, ~ o Q W Q ~ ~ ____ ~ W z ~ - ~ W ~ m `~ W ~ W ~' ~- z ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~j ~ ~ ~ i ,~ ~ _ ~ ~-- w z w Q ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ z ~ z ~ Q ~ m Q U ~ ~` ~ .. ~ ~ ~ .~ ~, ~, ~ I ~ ~ ~\ 400 300 200 100 0 100 =~0 300 400 '~ SCALE !.~A '~,, ~~ EASEMENT AREA ~~ ~\ /~ ~~~ PROPERTY OF KRUEGER METAL PRODUCTS, INC. ~~ TAX N0. 55.1 3-01 -03 ~~~ G~ENVAR EAST SEWER MAIN PLANIMETRIC SHEET: GG2 FEBRUARY 6,1996 SAN. SEWER MAIN TO BE REPLACED: ~~ K-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 1996 ORDINANCE FOR AUTHORIZATION TO ACQIIIRE NECESSARY SEWER LINE EASEMENTS AND PROPERTY TO CONSTRUCT THE CARVINS CREEK SEWER INTERCEPTOR AND GLENVAR EAST SEWER MAIN WHEREAS, location plans for the Carvins Creek Sewer Interceptor and Glenvar East Sewer Main Projects have been completed and the projects will require acquisition of sewer line easements across certain properties; and WHEREAS, said easements are to be acquired to facilitate any future construction of the Carvins Creek Sewer Interceptor and Glenvar East Sewer Main Projects; and WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs that the acquisition of real estate be accomplished by ordinance; the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 13, 1996, and the second reading was held on February 27, 1996. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the acquisition and acceptance of the necessary sewer line easements for the Carvins Creek Sewer Interceptor and Glenvar East Sewer Main Projects are hereby authorized across the following properties, referenced by tax map number, from the following property owners, their successors or assigns: TA% MAP NO. PROPERTY OWNER Carvins Creek Sewer Interceptor 27.00-1-2 Hollins College Corporation 27.11-4-55 Jimmie R. & Dorothy P. Hollandsworth 27.16-1-1 Jeffrey E. & Melissa Ballard .MMI' Glenvar East Sewer Main 55.13-1-3 Krueger Metal Products, Inc. 2. That the consideration for each easement acquisition shall not exceed a value equal to 40~ of the current tax assessment for the property to be acquired plus the cost of actual damages, if any; and 3. That the consideration for each easement shall be paid from the Sewer Repair and Replacement Fund; and 4. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish these acquisitions, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. agenda.realest.carvin.gle ~ r* 1, .~ ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER ~ ~ '~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 27, 1996 SUBJECT: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUNIlKARY OF INFORMATION: 1. BLUE RIDGE COMMUNITY SERVICES The three year term of Mrs. Cheri Hartman, Member at Large expired December 31, 1995. According to Dr. Fred Roessel, Executive Director, the BRCS will be meeting to recommend an individual for Mrs. Hartman's position which represents Roanoke County, and the Cities of Salem and Roanoke. The name of this nominee will be forwarded to the Board and must be confirmed by all three localities. 2. BUILDING CODE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS The four year term of Thomas A. Darnall, Architect, expired January 22, 1996. 3. HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION SAFETY COMMISSION The four year term of Ms. Jackie Talevi, Legal Representative expired June 30, 1995. Ms. Jackie Talevi, has served two consecutive terms and is not eligible for reappointment. This vacancy is being advertised on the Government Access Channel and the Clerk's Office has mailed information and application to two citizens. When this information is received, it will be forwarded to the Supervisors. ..r .+ SUBMITTED BY: Brenda J. H lton Deputy Clerk to the Board Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) APPROVED BY: G~G~ ~~s~•-~G-~~ ~ l~m C~z~,e~ ~-- Elmer C. Hod e County Administrator ACTION Motion by: VOTE No Eddy _ Harrison _ Johnson _ Minnix Nickens L1-~ Yes Abs r m~-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 1996 RESOLUTION 022796-6 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM M - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for February 27, 1996, designated as Item M - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 4, inclusive, as follows: 1. Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the League of Older Americans - Advisory Council. 2. Approval of Raffle Permit for Child Abuse Prevention Council of Roanoke Valley, Inc. 3. Donation of storm drainage, sanitary sewer, and waterline easements in connection with the development of Harris Teeter at the intersection of Brambleton Avenue and Colonial Avenue by R. S. Dickson & Company, d/b/a Ruddick Investment Company. 4. Donation of existing pump station lot and related access easement in Section 1 of The Gardens of Cotton Hill from Strauss Construction Corporation. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the Consent Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. olton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Vickie L. Huffman, Assistant County Attorney Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections A-022796-6.a ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER '! AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 27, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the League of Older Americans - Advisory Council COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The following nomination was made at the February 13, 1996 meeting: 1. League of Older Americans - Advisory Council Supervisor Eddy nominated Frances R. Holsinger to another one year term which will expire March 31, 1997. RECOMMENDATION' It is recommended that this appointment be confirmed by the Board of Supervisors. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, Brenda J. lton 'Elmer C. Hod e Deputy Clerk to the Board County Administrator ----------------------- ------- ------------ ------------------- ACTION --- VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Motion b~ Harry C. No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Nickens Eddy x Received ( ) Harrison x Referred ( ) Johnson x To ( ) Minnix x Nickens x cc: File League of Older Americans File J A-022796-6.b ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 27, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Approval of a Raffle Permit from the Child Abuse Prevention Council of Roanoke Valley, Inc. CO/~(U~NTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Child Abuse Prevention Council of Roanoke Valley, Inc. has requested a permit to hold a raffle in Roanoke County on April 6, 1996. The application has been reviewed with the Commissioner of Revenue and he recommends that it be approved. The application is on file in the Clerk's Office. The organization has paid the $25.00 fee. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the application for a Raffle Permit from the Child Abuse Prevention Council of Roanoke Valley, Inc. be approved. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: Brenda J. lton lmer C. Hod e Deputy Clerk to the Board County Administrator Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: Motion by Harry C. Nickens VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy x Harrison x Johnson x Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Bingo/Raffle File RAFFLE PERMIT APPLICATION m_a Application is hereby made for a raffle game permit. This application is made subject to all County and State laws, rules, ordinances, and regulations now in force, or that may be enacted hereafter and which are hereby agreed to by the undersigned applicant and officers of the organization and which shall be deemed a condition under which this permit is issued. Raffle games are strictly regulated by Title 18.2-340.1 gam. sea• of the criminal statutes of the Virginia Code, and by Section 4-86 ,~ sea• of the Roanoke County Code. These laws authorize the County Board of supervisors to conduct a reasonable investigation prior to granting a raffle permit. The Board has silty days from the filing of an application to grant or deny the permit. The Board may deny, suspend, or revoke the permit of any organization found not to be in strict compliance with county and state law. Name of organization Child Abuse Prevention Council of Roanoke Valley, Inc. Mailing Address 3201 Brandon Ave., Suite 1, Roanoke, VA 24018 City, State, Zip Code Roanoke, VA 24018 When was the organisation founded? 1979 Purpose and Type of Organisation Private, Non-profit Corp. * See Attachment I Has the organisation been in existence in Roanoke County for five continuous years? YES X NO adjoining - Roanoke City Is the organization non-profit? YES X NO Is the organization exempt under 5501(0)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code? YES X NO Attach copy of IRS Tax Exemption Letter. (If applicable) Does your organisation tune=stand*that any organization found in violation of the County Hingo and Raffle Ordinance or eeation 18.2- 34o.io et. se of the Code of virginia authorizing this permit is subject to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the above referenced Codes may be guilty of a felony? yes Does your organisation understand that it must maintain and file complete records of receipts and disbursements pertaining to Raffle games and that suoh records 'are subject to audit by the commissioner of the Revenue? yes COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIItGINIA P.O. BOX 20409 CONIlVIISSIONER OF THE REVENUE ROANOKE, VA 24018 1 Does your organisation understand that it is a violation of law to enter into a contract with .any person or firm, association, organisation (other than another qualified organisation pursuant to S 18.2-340.13 of the Code of Virginia), partnership, or corporation of any alassifiaation whatsoever, for th• purpose of organising, managing, or conducting Raffles ? yes ,M I/' DESCRIBE TH8 ARTICLES TO BE RAFFLED, VALOE OF SOCH ARTICLES: Article Description Children's Playhouse Children's Playhouse Children's Playhouse DATE OF RAFFLE 4/6/96 Fair Market Value $1,500 $1,500 $1,500 If this application is for an ANNOAL RAFFLE PERMIT, list below all dates raffles will b• held. Specific location where Raffl• drawing is to be aonduatad? Tanglewood Mall NOTE: Th s perm t shall be val d only for the above leant on. Any organisation holding a permit to conduct bingo games or raffles shall use twelve and one-half percent (12.5~k) of its gross receipts from all bingo games or raffles for those lawful religious, charitable, community or educational purposes for which the organisation is specifically chartered or organised. (County Code $4-101) State specifically how the proceeds from Raffle(s) will be used. List in detail the planned or intended use of the proceeds. Use estimated amounts ff necessary. proceeds will be used for expenses related to the Council's prevention programs: community education, program development, case consultation and support groups COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA P.O. BOX 20409 COMIVIISSIONER OF 1'~~ REVI;NLTE ROANOKI,;, VA 24018 2 Y` Officers of the Organisation: ~ r~ President: Wendy Moore Phone: 343-2337 Address• 2530 Stephenson Ave., Roanoke, VA 24014 Vice President: Melinda Cox Phone : 342-0003 Address • 2341 Carter Rd. , Roanoke, VA 24015 Secretary : Kay Kelly Phone : 343-9089 Address : 112 Serpentine Rd. , Roanoke, VA 24014 Treasurer: John Heitz Phone : 774-3856 Address • 6333 Christie Lane, Roanoke, VA 24018 lumber authorised to be rosponsibl• for Raffle operations: Name : Shannon M. Brabham Home Address 3527 Poplar Dr. , Roanoke, VA 24018 Phone 774-3089 Bus Phone 344-3579 Member responsible for filing finanoial report required by the oode if your organisation ceases to exists Name : Shannon M. Brabham Home Address 3527 Poplar Dr. , Roanoke, VA 24018 Phone 774-3089 Bus Phone 344-3579 Does your organisation understand that it will be required to furnish a oomplete list of its membership upon the request of the Commissioner of the Revenue? yes Has your organisation attaohed a oheok for the annual permit fee in the amount of $25.00 payable to the County of Roanoke? ves IF ALL QUESTIONS HAVE BEEN ANBWERED~ PROCEED TO NOTARIZATION. COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIItGINIA P.O. BOX 20409 CONIIVIISSIONER OF THE REVENUE ROANOKE, VA 24018 3 '~ NOTARIZATION .~ THE FOLLOWING OATH MUST HE TAKEN BY ALL APPLICANTB: ~,,.~ I hereby shear or affirm under th• penalties of perjury as set lorth in 618.2-434 of the Cod• of Virginia, that all of the above statements are true to the beat of zay kaoMledge, information, and beliefs. All questions have bean answered. I further shear that I have read and understand the attached copies of 8eo. 18.2-340.1 ~. sec• of the Cod• of Virginia and 8eotion 4-86 ~ sea• of the Roanoke County Code. 8~gned by s - ~,~~1~ I~ ~~ - r ~r ~a7 -~o ~l~-7~r. Name T tle some Address Ro~~ke, ~ ~~ ~~U lg 8ubsaribed and sWOrn before me, this `~_day of 19~ in the County/City of (~~C( Il(),~~Q , Virginia. ~. ~L My commission expires: a ~ ~ 19~~ Notary Publ a NOT VALID UNLE88 COONTERBIaNED The above application, having been found in due form, is approved and issued to the applicant to have effect until December 31st of this calendar year. Date mm ss ner of th Revenue The above application is not approved. Date Comm ss oner of the Revenue COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA P.O. BOX 20409 COMIVIISSIONER OF Tl~ REVENUE ROANOKE, VA 24018 --,-~ 4 .` ACTION NO. ITEM NO. A-022796-6.c rn-3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 27, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Donation of storm drainage, sanitary sewer, and waterline easements to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County in connection with development of Harris Teeter at the intersection of Brambleton Avenue and Colonial Avenue by R. S. Dickson & Company, d/b/a Ruddick Investment Company. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~CC. i:r r~i+l ~n/ C6 ~Ge'~7 T•L.7C r_ P1" ~/~r1 [; ~ti.j ('.rICn T.1~, SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: in er Spring Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke: This consent agenda item involves the donation of the following easements to the Board of Supervisors in connection with the site development by R. S. Dickson & Company, d/b/a Ruddick Investment Company for the Harris Teeter Project located at the t section of Brambleton Avenue and Colonial Avenue in the Cave a) Donation of a storm drainage and sanitary sewer easement, of variable width, from Nelson A. Craighead and Mary S. Craighead, husband and wife, (Deed Book 589, page 376) (Tax Map No. 87.05-5-18) shown and designated as "NEW STORM DRAIN AND SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT" on a plat prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C., dated December 7, 1995, a copy of which is attached hereto and entitled as Exhibit D. b) Donation of a waterline easement, of variable width, from R. S. Dickson & Company, d/b/a Ruddick Investment Company, a North Carolina corporation, (Deed Book 1489, page 50) (Tax Map No. 86.08-1-4) shown and designated as "NEW WATER LINE EASEMENT" on a plat prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C., dated December 7, 1995, a copy of which is attached hereto and entitled as Exhibit F. I'Y1-3 c) Donation of a storm drainage easement from R. S. Dickson & Company, d/b/a Ruddick Investment Company, a North Carolina corporation, (Deed Book 1489, page 50) (Tax Map No. 86.08-1-4) shown and designated as "NEW STORM DRAIN EASEMENT" on a plat prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C., dated December 7, 1995, a copy of which is attached hereto and entitled as Exhibit A. d) Donation of a sanitary sewer easement, thirty feet (30') in width, from R. S. Dickson & Company, d/b/a Ruddick Investment Company, a North Carolina corporation, (Deed Book 1489, page 50) (Tax Map No. 86.08-1-4) shown and designated as "NEW 30' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT" on a plat prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C., dated December 7, 1995, a copy of which is attached hereto and entitled as Exhibit C. The location and dimensions of these properties have been reviewed and approved by County staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of these easements. Respectfully submitted, r ~` V cki L. H f n Assistant County Attorney Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: Motion by Harry C. Nickens VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy x Harrison x Johnson x Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Vickie L. Huffman, Assistant County Attorney Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning I A Z TAX /87.05-5-IB PARCEL 2-A PROPERTY OF PROPERTY OF g ~YA~RY S AICt1E~ p t R.S. DICKSON & COMPANY ~+, D.& 589, PG 376 D.B.A. ~ RUDDICK INVESTMENT CO., A NORTH CAROLINA CORPORATION ~ D.B. 1489, PG. 50 " B TAX #86.08-1-4 ~ ~~~ C - - - - EX. I.P. ~ ----- NEW STORM DRAIN ~ AND SANITARY SEWER EXISTING EASEMENT 20' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT D.B. 783, PG. 522 N 00'23'46" w ---_---- v.7r ~ A EXISTING Nd3~3~~• w I IRON PIN IQ3.00(iQTAO TAX /86.08-1-1 ~ ( PROPERTY OF GENE A. BOWLES do CALLIE R. BOWLES D.B. 1474, PG. 1546 I c ~ LEQEND ~ $ NEW 8TORM DRAW i ~ ° AND EASEMENT EWER ~ DENOTES NEw EASprENT r: o TION ° i-A N 0024 36 w 37.91 EX. I.P. EXISTING IRON PIN ° A-B S 57"0218 E 58.64 ~ -C S 1 . -D S 8 3 w ~ -E N b3 46 w 60. -~ N w n. AREA ^ 426 S.f. NOTES. 1, THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A CURRENT TITLE REPORT AND THERE MAY EXIST ENCUMBRANCES NOT SHOWN HEREON. 2. THIS PLAT IS FOR THE PURPOSE OF CREATING A NEW STORM DRAIN AND SANITARY SEWER EASEIiAENT AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACTUAL BOUNDARY SURVEY, PLAT SHOWING "EXHIBIT D" NEW STORM DRAIN AND SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT BEING GRANTED TO THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VA NELSON A.e CRAIGHEAD AND MARY S. CRAIGHEAD LOCATED ON TAX #87.05-5-18 (D.B. 589, PG. 376) CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA ~c PL~ln uF Dl ~fC,. Z!, I4'fS ~~ TIMOTHY ~.~ HO LZ~~ _ ~ N ~ ~ SCALE 1" = 20' DATE: 7 DECEMBER 1995 LUMSDEN ASSOCIATES, P.C. ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS-PLANNERS ROANOKl, Y~10l~A X11-3 \ EXISTING ' PARCEL 2-A 10 WATERLINE EASEMENT PROPERTY ~ B D.B. 1119, PG. 123 R•S. ~~ ~ COMPANY o.e.~ RUDDIpC NVESTYENT COMPANY, A ^ A NORTH CAROLINA CORPORAflON y ~~ f ~~i 'P ~O O• ~. ~, 'P ,w 1 ~ ~• O. T P ER~O~AN OgrEOA 6/ 5/1y9~'10~ D.B. 1489, PG 50 ~ ~ _'°ROP TAX /86.08-1-4 PARKION~D / ~- EXISTING ~ ~ ~ ~,~ ~~(j?~~ APCO AND CkP TELEPHONE /-'i~. ~' UTILITY EASEMENT ~+ ~',~t.'Q~~,y, (SEE NOTE a3) /~~ ~O~-'G~J?' / "~ ` D ~ ~ G~ P. `Q- N rr,,.-- _ -- E 67,?s. / EX. I.P. NEW 1NATER- L~ EA8fE1lNT N NEMI MIATER LINE EASEMENT AN 9-10 N 11 E 87.25 10-A N '29 00 E 128.4 A-B 1 13.90 w 115;n C-0 S 11 w 58.06 D-E S 58'1818 E 129.68 E-9 N '24 09 w 134.88 CHD. A ^ 00 S.F. T iH T C-1 96 184. 81 1 N w 440 C-2 528.98 135.25 68.00 134.88' N 63'24'09' w 14'39'00 LEGEND = CONCRETE CURB CONCRETE CURB Ac CUTTER ® DENOTES NEw EASEMENT EX. I.P. EXISTING IRON PIN NOTE8~ 1. THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED MATHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A CURRENT TITLE REPORT AND THERE MAY EXIST ENCU~ABRANCES NOT SHOWN HEREON. 2. THIS PLAT IS FOR THE PURPOSE OF CREATING A NEW WATER LINE EASEMENT AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACTUAL BOUNDARY SURVEY. 3. SEE V.D.O.T. PLANS PROJECT 0221-080-107, SHEETS 6 de 6B FOR APCO ANO Cdr TELEPHONE UTILITY EASEAAENTS. 4. SEE PLAT PREPARED FOR HARRIS TEETER INC.. DATED AUGUST 30, 1985, BY LUTASDEN ASSOCIATES, P.C., AND RECORDED IN P.B. 18, PG. 36 SHOMANG PARCEL 2-A. PLAT SHOWING "EXHIBIT F" NEW WATER LINE EASEMENT BEING GRANTED TO THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VA BY R.S. DICKSON & COMPANY DBA RUDDICK INVESTMENT COMPANY, A NORTH COROLINA CORPORATION LOCATED ON PARCEL 2-A (o.e. ~ 489, PG. so) CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA SCALE 1" = 40' DATE: 7 DECEMBER 1995 LUM8DEN A880CIATE8, P.C. ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS-PLANNERS ROANOKE, Y~10MA fie. 21, nrr ~~~ TIMOTHY ~,~ H~O/E~~a u C~.'"fit ~ ~ '~1-3 rn~~r,~ uo~_no~ PARCEL 2-A PROPERTY Of R.S. gCKSON Ic COMPANY 08A MERIDIAN OF RUDOICK INVESTMENT COMPANY, V,D.O.T. PLAN 0221-080-107 A NORiH CAROLNA CORPORATION GATED 06/05/1990 D.B. 1489, PG 50 1AX /86.08-1-4 B ti~ NEW STORM DRAIN v EASEMENT /r EX LP: eR'~41~~ \~~ VS FAO N 02"03'ii" E SEE NOTE p NEMI STORM DRAIN 10-A N 36'29 00 E 25.55 A-B S 41.35 SSE 23. -c s 4824 w 25.00 -1o N 4x3555 w 100 AREA ~ 516 S.f . 67.25'(TOTAL) ~J~ ,~~1 r~ ~y ~`3 ~~ LEDEND = CONCRETE CURB CONCRETE CURB Ac CUTTER DENOTES NEw EASEMENT Ex. I.P. EICSTINO IRON PW N4TE8~ 1. THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A CURRENT TITLE REPORT ANO THERE MAY EXIST ENCUMBRANCES NOT SHOWN HEREON. 2. THIS PLAT IS FOR THE PURPOSE OF CREATING A NEW STORM DRAIN EASEMENT AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACTUAL BOUNDARY SURVEY. 3. SEE PLAT PREPARED FOR HARRIS TEETER INC., GATED AUGUST 30, 1995, BY LUMSDEN ASSOCIATES, P.C., AND RECORDED IN P.B. t8, PG. 36 SHOWING PARCEL Z-A. PLAT SHOWING "EXHIBIT A" NEW STORM DRAIN EASEMENT BEING GRANTED TO THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VA BY R.S. DICKSON & COMPANY DBA RUDDICK INVESTMENT COMPANY, A NORTH COROLINA CORPORATION LOCATED ON PARCEL 2-A (D.B. 1489, PG, 50) CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA SCALE i" = 20' DATE: 7 DECEMBER 1995 ~~ Dtc. Zl~ /94s m ' TIMOTHY HO E . 1 rn-3 LUM8DEN A88OCIATEB, P.C. ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS-PLANNERS 110ANOKE, YIIIONA n \ ~`~~~/y n`- O i -'( ~ ~ ~ N a'2S'~4• E 7 g 9.t9 c EXISTING ~ k' APCO AND CdcP TELEPHONE do U71UTY EASEMENT c (SEE NOTE p3) NOTE N Z m ~ r m ~ Z ~ K cn~,yOa (p . ~ W ~ n ~ ~ O ~ D ~ ~ U w m m p U ~ ~ ~ ~ EXISTING HI IRON PIN u ~i ° ~ c' • m ~ Z v ~ .~ r r^ A ~ m O ~ - ~? ~ ~ W N N ~ ~~~-< r ' ,~ o m N N ~ ~ 5 ~- - f1QS1N~G APCO UTILITY EASEMENT (SEE NOTE ~3) RY TH T T TA -1 C-2 526.96 164.28 42.81 163.62' N 64 30 w 17'4 40 LEGEND = CONCRETE CURB CONCRETE CURB A GUTTER DENOTES NEw EASEMENT NOTES. 1. THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A CURRENT TITLE REPORT AND THERE MAY EX ENCUMBRANCES NOT SHOWN HEREON. 2. THIS PLAT IS FOR THE PURPOSE OF CREATING A NEW SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT ANO DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACTUAL BOUNDARY SURVEY. 3. SEE V.O.O.T. PLANS PROJECT 0221-080-107, SHEETS 6 dt 68 FOR APCO ANO CHIP TELEPHONE UTII EASEMENTS. 4. SEE PLAT PREPARED FOR HARRIS TEETER INC., DATED AUGUST 30, 1995, BY LUMSDEN ASSOCIATES, P,C., AND RECORDED IN P.B. 18, PG. 36 SHOWING PARCEL 2-A. PLAT SHOWING "EXHIBIT C" NEW 30' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT BEING GRANTED TO THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VA ~~~1,TH 0 BY R.S. DICKSON & DBA RUDDICK INVESTME COMPANY ~o'~'d~c-z!,ltt!s TIMOTHY ~ H E NT COMPANY, U A NORTH COROLINA CORPORATION LOCATED ON PARCEL 2-A (D.B. 1489, PG. 50) CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA SCALE i' = 100' DATE: 7 DECEMBER 1995 LUY8DEN ASSOCIATES, P.C. ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS-PLANNERS IIOANOKE. Y~1aNA ~YI-3 rnr~n~ a~ • A-022796-6.d ACTION NO. ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 27, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Donation of Existing Pump Station Lot and related access easement in Section 1 of The Gardens of Cotton Hill, from Strauss Construction Corporation to the County of Roanoke COUNTY ADMpINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: / J ~CC-c~.>,~.rr_,~d Q.c~e~/t~:.,c~y , ~ 7°~~e ~Jce..,P jT:~;e.~ ~oT. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This consent agenda item involves the donation and acceptance of the following parcel of land for a pump station lot, together with the necessary access easement, in connection with the sewer system previously dedicated to and accepted by the County of Roanoke: a) Donation from Strauss Construction Corporation of an existing Pump Station Lot (Tax Map No. 96.07-2-12.1), adjoining Lot 12, Block 1, as shown on Plat of Section No. 1, The Gardens of Cotton Hill, which plat is recorded in Plat Book 16, page 157, in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court for the County of Roanoke, Virginia, and a copy of which is attached hereto; TOGETHER WITH the right to use the 15' Access Easement for access to and from said Pump Station Lot, as shown on Plat of Section No. 1, The Gardens of Cotton Hill, recorded as aforesaid. The location and dimension of this property and easement have been reviewed and approved by County staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of the pump station lot. Respectfully submitted, L V ck e L. Huf n Assistant Cou y Attorney ~-~ Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: Motion by Harry C. Nickens VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy x Harrison x Johnson x Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Vickie L. Huffman, Assistant County Attorney Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning I a I I ~I i fLl a 6EI 'Od '91 'B'd d0 NVIOIN3Y1 .(~ _._ Aga- a~ ~b$. ~~= ~i b ~~8~8~~j~~~~i~~~g~F~ ~i~71~g~g~~'~~~~~~~ y `s c d s C~~ W N W J d~ S~! W \ W• \\ >~~ ~~ ~ V+ \\ _k3~ ga ~f~ \~ Y P}~h \ Viggo ~ o \\ Q _ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ a~' r ~1 7Z11~Ga~ F~~~LLLL ~,s€Y= <~ a No Y 3 S k z ~~ o~m tg ~I ~,r F / ~~~ nM1^e ~ I,yp W , ` 1 ~ J J / r YV \, 8 i N y z w °~ ~ ° m O O " ~ a U ~ ,~ " Z ~ ^ n U e o. ~z ~ I~ ~? ° ~+p ~ 'Z ~'"~ a~ °~ N ~_ Wga s~ d= Z Q aN N~ o m Z~ Z (Y Z~~ u j v~s N N ~' vi T ° v°i p p F ~ r-~ o ~ ~ ° U a ~= QI 0 d ° ° l(1 '^ z ° ~ ~ w Th E"~ °Q ~o m° L J z~~ ~ V . E-+ s vai a a a m p ~ ~ ~ a ~U Q w ~ r, O N Q W W ~ U W x U a J r a (~ ° v H ~ 2 VI I^ VI .~ m ~N 1 ~4 a~ ~, o c =w~ a rc °W [~ ~ [c K T J y i B 7 ~ `N i ~A/o~ _ ~ N ,,, O S\9 `Y `~, (, -" N 5 ~TJYS ~ ~ yd 7~.9d s o ` o ~' ~~ -~ m - _. ~ ~ ~ 'o w 6 i ~i GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA of General Amount Fund Revenues Beginning Balance at July 1, 1995 (audited) $6,994,906 8.09% Addition from 1995-96 Budget 10,558 Sept 12, 1995 Donation to IDA - Rusco (127,500) Feb 13, 1995 Va Western Community College -site improvements (66,379) Feb 21, 1996 R. R. Donnelley & Sons (2,500,000) Balance at February 27, 1996 $4,311,585 4.99% Designated for work done to date on Cave Spring Jr (367,000) Designated for debt service on new school capital (1,000,000) 2,944,585 3.41 Changes below this line are for information and planning purposes only. These amounts have not been appropriated to fund balance at this time. The increase in projected 1995-96 revenues is based on the most recent estimate of the year in process, and could be adjusted up or down as the year progresses. These funds are not available to be appropriated to other projects at th time. Balance from above $2,944,585 Recommended increase in 1995-96 budgeted revenues based upon 6 month review 2,830,183 Designated for debt service of new school capital (760,439) $5,014,329 5.80% Note: On December 18, 1990, the Board of Supervisors adopted a goal statement to maintain the General Fund Unappropriated Balance at 6.25% of General Fund Revenues 1995-96 General Fund Revenues $86,464,490 6.25% of General Fund Revenues $5,404,031 Respectfully Submitted, Diane D. Hyatt M:\Finance\Common\Board\Gen95. WK4 CAPITAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Beginning Balance at July 1, 1995 (audited) July 17, 1995 Payment on sale of old School Administration Building Aug 18, 1995 Sale of land adjacent to Kessler Mill Road to VDOT Balance at February 27, 1996 Receivable from the City of Salem July 1, 1996 from the sale of the old School Administration Building Designated for new school capital improvements bonds Respectfully Submitted, Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance Amount $405,409.00 399,984.00 1,020.00 $806,413.00 200,000.00 (1,006,413.00) 0.00 M:\Finance\Common\Board\Cap95. WK4 ~3 RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Amount Beginning Balance at July 1, 1995 (Unaudited) $1,773.00 From 1995-96 Original Budget 100,000.00 July 27, 1995 Survey of Needs -Four Year University (2,500.00 Sept 26, 1995 Red Line Service - CORTRAN (6,023.00 Nov 21, 1995 County share of Cox Cable Audit (1,700.00 Dec 12, 1995 Expenses related to Comprehensive Plan update (29,166.00 Dec 12, 1995 Sister City program (1,000.00 Dec 12, 1995 VML / VACO APCO Steering Committee (4,000.00 Feb 13, 1996 Special election on bond referendum (20,280.00 Feb 13, 1996 Special election for Republican primary (20,280.00 Feb 13, 1996 Survey of East County citizens (7,500.00 Balance at February 27, 1996 $9,324.00 Respectfully Submitted, Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance M:\Finance\Common\Board\Board95. WK4 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER~.„_ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVI3OR8 OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: Felxuary 27,1996. AGENDA ITEMS: Statsmerk of the Trsaarer's Axo~,mtabiNty per hrvestments and Portfolio PoNcy, as of January 31,1596. COUNTY ADMINI8TRATOR'3 COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: BANKERS ACCEPTANCE: CRAIGIE 1,991,420.83 BCOTT i4 BTRINGFELLOW 996,453.36 81GNET 2,007,037.98 8MlTH-BARNEY-8HEAR8ON 985,550.00 WHEAT 18T 4,788,985.00 10,779,427.16 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSRS: SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA SAVINGS ~ LOAN 100,000.00 100,000.00 COMMERICAL PAPER: CENTRAL FIDELITY 1,991,332.23 NATIONS 995,458.33 PAINS-WEBBER 2,986,896.12 SIGNET 3,476,057.50 9,449,544.18 FEDERAL CREDIT: PAINS-WEBBER 995,838.89 PRUDENTWL 1,985,791.87 BMITH-BARNEY-$HEAR3ON 995,854.44 3,977,483.00 LOCAL GOVT INVESTMENT POOL: GENERAL FUND 10,234,805.59 RE8OURCE AUTHORITY 1,504,797.21 11,739,402.80 REPURCHASE AGREEMENT: CENTRAL FIDELITY 1,000,000.00 FIR8T VIRGINIA 5,374,000.00 8,374,000.00 INVESTt1AENT: COMMONWEALTH (RES. AUTH.) 5,088,635.18 5,088,635.18 TOTAL 47,508,494.32 :~~:~:~ STAFF RECOMMENDATION: R Submitad'6y Approved by /( .G-i.~'.'.~ , ..-e. ,''~,~~`~J • e p /, t ..CYs-- tt ~~l~rr/~~ L ~ A~ C. ~~~ ~ ~ County Treasurer County Adma4strsitor ACTION VOTE Approved ()Motion by No Yes Abs Dsr~sd () ELY .._ _.. Rec~hred () Harrison +, _ „_ Rehrrod () Johnson _ _ Nicksns _ _ _ I ~! I c II - (J I - ~~ I !) y W I 19 F i ¢ 2 2a I ~ ~ I I ~ ~ ~ I I ~ I ~ I I i ~~*~ t ym m m lu~ Mt c ~ alo 0 u q N {7 C O M p N n m K b I °~~ >mz ~ «Wo c t J I}- O b J U ¢ ~. ~r LL ,. F L o M l I I I II r'1 VI it 0 2 q q r O <L' 4 O v m rn v ro 7 m m 9 w m U C ., ro ro -~ m ro L m C W m 7 q C I- m )- > m N ~ m t V m C > O N E 4: U Y C I m 7 Ot u.. V 7 m ro I L m C m 0 O Z )h-T o N 7 b+Q:' N o Mht K c^•'a'.o curl--o[nM ~ ~OJ UI lonJ oo - o fn r'r )Or-,pNT I^of tt+- I I. I . r'1 N N I o 07 111 7 F c~v N I~l t- rV r r- r o a 1 ut •r rh 4t In .o li- cn .o m r- r•1 ~ rt ~ r - I - i I r h M r~ o f r o F~ o -^f-- u0l on - 7 ~ N 7 U o r-r-ul.n7w ~ F I ._ t c i i i a I I f I I ~ I I l I f I ' I I r I • I ' I 1 I • I I ' I I I • I I I I 1 I I 1 I 1 I i -a - wWoN, G+o)lyt c• ob?nJ r-JiNr- r~r•r-~k ul u-Im nr-M1Jr o"i, N'a .bN^•~m r~ rF ', 5NC0io o?r .-olp a orYtln.o!Llnc,++r~cm.o c•d~ ^.arn-rte utao6N.o~r- rh rn .ombor-, a?r~hltnJO,nrto•xoi'.1!hrr-rlh._ ~-.rr`ut o r~•tEI•m--rm r{- r~ t o UI U'lo.0 QJ a0 c+Ulm o~ nr-7 o r~ ~ c~ 7Ul •n r r-cp t~+-r iNNifl r~ N7M •r - N T 1f m L•1 OJ ~+ ? b) hl 0 47 ^ - r- V-t ~ Q~ ~ Q+ ul r b W 4~ N 'r N P rF r~ 1 m } NTM 7!ti MnJ m ^ - N rh .o- N rl-NO,i 7N d~ !O - I I II i J II I IN Ilt o- N `r o-it O ~ hN c h N N N Fr'I lfl t(l J7 I~N~ o.-b1~CIn nJ N .o L(1 ~l j r 00 C ^ 11 T C. ~a L•r 'O R M I!- o S a o, VI'. ~ c^~ qI ? f1 c+ rt .p ~ CO Q' N o F rrTT~~ M aa•m NOt^~,n~ hi •.oo?+ar- n~z?.^ ~OUIr!-~~a•-mr~bo)r- n In ut AI~ II I. i t P o r'1 'r ^ 0 6+ - Ijl 'O N 1}1 7 r1 <L N v- 1}1 P c. T T N m N o 4 r- ~l .n O of I N O1 4J~ N +- o o UO - rt D7 M ~ 7 N m r1 (11 r'r '11 r}- N P a- n nJ M1, F r- w o O b o ~~. r (It W 41 ut 7 7 M ~ ~. r!t o I,, ._ - .11 ~O •a ~ nl rr 7 A? Y-' - .u N ~'1 ~. N I i i I ~ ' I m w ~I ':~;~ i ~ I ~ ~ ~_ - -~ I i h N o r~ m O N N l11 O v) J) ~ M 't ,C: r- u'I -~- O ,b '' Ut 'Jl ,O N 'r t!1 M ttnmG~ c 7r~r n ctltmulo-, aNan-urcly c.o -oirnco~ortr m ( •a ,b -ut^4IJ =r ~o ut r~oln 6+rJ r-rrr~ =m~v ,n ~'J ,b o?~-o~Fr` ~) j o 0 7 .O Ot C m ,D In If- Q? ~- - ~ U1 r? N - C'J rV ti In ~ Q M1.I S O (~- N M ppJ N ~ 7 J ~ •OLJh i 7 AP -._ !, rt f~t ,a i --^~7 ~N - li ~ ~! Ili I ~ T ~ ~' I ~ ~ ~ ~ I 0oomoo oopoo•boo 00000 0 ^o~^_)ot{to.0 n U1 000 00 Oobo Om oob oo OOO.oo U1 .oo Mo to F~ MNI11 ~. >oo~o o~oodaoob oopoo oPOI(IO rn ~'nl{t o~N-oo?o If17Y1 . _ I. IlI 0o U1 ~'10oooolhoo~olllm UlN? ^ ot~tn ~~ Wrh~U'r a75NN~ r't4M >or-IV-mt'~?tou711-uloboUlQJUIm t 7NQ.'.- ~•-mm? oQ+N1114) ~O(Alt9 ~ N F iir}}+lt M rh CO 1~ 'h' ,O f'1 ~O o nl - j 4 Nl N rf~ (O r~ ? I`• 4~ V1 T L~ n ,p ~. .111 V N T- ~ O1 ~ ~ ~ - r!t I .p I i If- O N N ~ I ~~! ~i ~ I ~ Or ~. ro p I ~ I !j I I r ~ I ~n ~ . i I L o ro y C¢F In ... I i am ~ N~ U~ {IU ~~ O I IU --+ III i m 6 I m I~ ll UI C W N t N I I C O U N N UI v~ % 11 h4 i I O L ~" ri? M m ro •~ k In ~n E a > ro Y w }' ~, by ; m UI j m m > Up-'nU ro O N F- 17 x N C ~- O N 1- 4- N rJ1 E I L ~.. c. m 1- o. br ro k N x l o N I,_ m ~ o o w m v m L hr L a L C- M1- F- ,o IE 4. w ~ m 7 ~ U L m ~ rJ) O 6) m ~ r)7 UI >• O W O~1 v F~ b L Ol i m IJI J+ m m~ ~r OI D ¢ T I V m Y c) 1~ m I :0 ~ V IL c ~ tL m ~+ N N j -~ O w -l m .IM+ m :7 II k 7 x N J~ m m I -+ b'U07 L» LK N~+ ro Y tL U U b m m ?- m ro c j L ul I L T. v I ,. L* b 7 a I r m ~ ro :~ I -~ C I- a u -+ r- ~ m x m b c a, ro b -. L ro E E u? a 4r m u u c1 lJ V L II o-. J uro}!um~ra 7L oo v o~ o b-.oU N L> I W ~^' F- V N U }~ b N~ 7 I O 'J IL L L~ L w b U L w N m Ih ¢ U C F' d L X11 C m J ~r ~ ~•+ O L m F of tl i 4- lL b O L hr O f1 ++ I m m m -~ mL J~6. x b T17 V-'I-'0 U O.k~C N{! C r+ M .~ UI ... ro L N N iU C r0 4) L ~• a U1 N L Q, m IU V O '0 ~ L N N v O) N O >• ~! I H I C W O O m m M 71 L r 4 N -r U m U C U~ C m L~ / l• 'G r' U~ 7 7 b m I m N ~J L F Y 4- O ~.. m ~-. ~ C U LLL N ++ }a W L ~0 ~~+ Y O C C ~ Or J7 > U W r0 L ~0 N L ~ YI N E N {{{rrrlll +~ C p m W m E V E L I+ m m L E ~~yJ"' O I C. b- N r U m C ro L J] >- U t Ur ro x~ x t .«, C L IL m 0 >> ro ~~+ N U C ^l L •~ 7 L ~ w m 7 ro 0 7 L ro Y {~p~U ro +. t ro w m .. L~ m m L m~ m 0 0 i+ 9 V L CO. 4. ~O.J VEIL ~LIrr F-OSM-OQJIL tLU1 Q:D-41VO:~~ZO]30~W O F- I~D - Ni~'1 N~NNQJ N N~NNbry~ MM ~ r'11'1~7? ~ QI71 U1 Ubl •D .b .ON ~~ OQ`b` ~p o o~ o 0 0 0 o m o o i o o b o o~ o o~ o o d~ o 0 0 0 0~ o 0 0 o p o ~ I ~ I I n r- r~J ,O J ¢ F O H O Z ¢ K c~ \ ~ '. N O .- ~ ~ I ~a 0 0 W W Ln F Q n- n d M N C O T W .L. ~ 4 J ~ LL y~ O O r!Y C Q ro 0 1 W - _ + f" =^~ Z O E J 7 6 O U U ~~ 4) W 0- o N S Y L O i a N i ~ l U G 7 ro d d c9 0 Z LL L 0. I a o 1 E I 7 ?~ I U I c m I w 1 N I w ro I 1 9 I d I 4 I d 1 E I 7 1 U 1 C I d I C 1 UI d 1 L A I 7 E 1 ++ 7 I -~ u I 'O G 1 C W 1 a I 4 W I x 1 W I fT C I 1 ~ I C I ro 1 Y I N 1 Y I 7 I O I 1 1 T 1 1 L ~ 1 H I C I D I E I 1 I I 1 I 1 I O r- N 0 0 l M ~ I ~ In M M M h h- W h ~ ~ C c, m d J n In M In r to ~ m 'c hl o I ~- ) •- J r In N 7 1 N 7 7 J M In i r N ~ h fY! N N to ^ o ~i ~a ~ M N M ~ ' M O N OJ N • u iF W ~ ~ o r tl F 4 L Z p C4 d 07 N .~+ ~+ r m Q N L 1 ~•+ p 2 N r ~ .. u O d ~ d .+ ~' J W O O O O .- M o ..- .- O o O _ _ _ N 7 r0 .v f r- i r ~ Ui Q i 1 G+ ~~ Mi I cU 7. 1 ~ i r- mr N t i In t •, l I ~~ r 4~ r nJ -- r .- r of r a~ .I U1 L 0 U O 0 1 Ill 1 N N n. .~ J c h M ~ ^ 0 J 1 i ^ iro N l t ~O r 7 t ^ f In f t h, 1 N N d C ~ 1+ i~ ~3 E i s+ u W N N O UI e:~ D; !n 0 n~ 0.. c f! 1 M v7 I. ~. u .~ o - N 7 i - c~ I 7 G• C4 o~ N I al f In I O~ t ~ mr ~J 1 If ~ J Mr J r< - a 1 p. i v r ~ N r - r` , Y C G U IJ F- I r C I d E I d I U L 0 C i w a J G M O N UI N N 0 M 1.1 Ul ~N 1 7 a a~ N -~ h. r- i o r i ~~ rl Ul ~ i Ul I Y m I r I J r M - 0 I - fl) 1 J Y ~ as t ~ N i In ~ ^ ` ~ ~ r O r - o t 1 N r I.; C O v C N d O I .b I I C .o ~ V i ~ L O V O M M O r Li I hl In i o? c. ~~ ~ i VI } .._ n d ~ n ~, , ri •r i o v~ ~ r- ~J I o .- n ~ 1 J ~n 7 nJ r r r- r r i or Ul o r M [d c o+ to c 1 In [ l N M tl 1'1 I ~ Ut O a I m O d ~ m a. d rY O N 0 o> r- o M o) ~Inl au~ml D N ~t ~ f .- i ~ o-i J ^ o l 1 O ~- ( r- ,.p r- ~ [U J r c r ~ P M I 1 - N I F m ? M ? ~ 1 7 - l !' 4~ t - V f 1 •- < J W c In t l•-oc Ivr-~ I fU U~ L h-Na •aD N~ A .o of 1 hl N 1 M h - W W N N I N d a a I C E o I L U d ~ d d C O~ .+ m ~ .O L i C Ifl W U' 4 I O LI} M M R 7 O O u u~ h o'. r .v r c. ~ rn In _ ~ tll Ui ~ m - M ~U S [0 1 N 1 np l N 1 rn 1 In 1 M 1 N m m i i m c i 3 ~ U a a 0 v I -~ V o N [U N N O M 7 . ~n ~D O OD G~ ( ~O W In N W d In r` M r• M M N UI h- M V' O O i'1 ~. OD 7 N M N T I M -- M N ~h O~ .D a0 M P M N R N N o .~ c+ .- I v mw 'hi a+ 'o. N -- ° •- i" N ~~ I fl i T .O M f M M ui M 1 M o ~p h- O N N ' IT t ~ f N J N M N o N ~' N M o o M 1 ~o M o U1 M M M c+ o ~ M N M M 7 0 .- N C O N N N C of Gi L d L O U N C U N ro d t L v -~ V Y Y m ~ .. c > m m a o L d d N ~+ d S S 6 +~ N 7 .' ~ ro c a n m u E d d ~-+ rn O I(1 N O O i NN M7 I!1 N ~ N W N 0 0 O O O .. ,. ,. - - _ Q. ro ni o o ~ G N ~ CI M ~ I C I o U W (_ ~ ~ a o W i! O o rn I ro ~ O I ~ _ 0. F O 2 O Y F C J 7 Q O U V N W I r I 0 I I i ~ t I i it i I I N \ ~ i, = o a v L O 9 r r- 1 a o I E I 7 \ I U I C m I W 1 N I w ro I 1 V 1 d 1 L I d I a I E I 7 I U 1 c I W I c I N W I L a I 7 E I ~ 7 1 U 1 V C I C W 1 4 I dw 1 x 1 w 1 of ~ t I V 1 C t m I y 1 N 1 y 1 7 1 O I 1 I T I I .C I N 1 C 1 O 1 S 1 I 1 V 1 C I 7 1 W 1 1 I m I L 1 a c d co 0 CI 2 I LL <" fn o• .~ Jnlr• o r r c In UI 0? ( M ( r Ln O 7 .- ( Q+ Ln o r W U1 0 r r o . r W o a6 M -L .~ 'cNL r h f .- ) c vl 6~ - O lri o r L N ~ L W l r ~O ` T [O th M ~ 7 M -- f r m N L ~O P Nf o ) N f0 f N m .., E C ', 7 m x of ~ I L L O O y d m L > v L N d C C fn O • E O a+ 9 r m a d N L O C U U O d K Y y c 7 w m a y ..~ N N L ac ,. ~. L N C N N O d Q U 0 0 0 '- 1 V Ui r rr O G O r l > r- M 1 CU M 1 CL"J 1 M 7 •- i r~ - N N 0 IXI t fL~ CU J N tip K N ~ N J 1 III W 7 ~ 7 V w C O .~ m d L U V d tc J N Y 1 m a 0 0 0 1 r 0 7 1 r-( rlwr U1 W < Ul 7 f C c~ t fU K' , ~.nt r. c . UI Mf N • O C:. ', c ~ ( hJ M( (U r'1 f M L ri •- ( r rJ ~Int ~~ U1 ( K 7 ( Ul Ul t 7 .- < o m c r-ter r r ~-N rorr UI E m L d O 1 N T C i c a ~ C x . O W ~ N ~ w>f Ir Y i c m ++ L I C d I c dl a I R UL' ut o -- N oD x °1 to i a~ > V' i ^S _ p} r V rl _r iM r •- i In J W ,N 1 M 1 10 )o o _ ~ r J o 7 O rN o -r o t C • ~ U M m Lr L 0 U d V C ~m L 1 N =u >• i~ 1 7 Ja to <r I~ (o 4~ Li r, . ,• n o ~-, I ~ .. r- n -r 7 r Ih < rt V 4 I, I o t- c Ul c fU r, i c~ r I o C 7V M tO h 1 ~ i I V L I W d m m d T O n E w 0 0 I m o c m o c 1 nJ nJ 1 C~ O C q. o I -- Lr~ ~, loS NV K C O 1 [I} i r~ 1 N ul 1 C~ ~ N . o o < 1 O O < l o o ~ 1UI U5^ 1 o N V 7 OI L n I dl i u 1 C m 4l I T I L 1 d 1 N ~ :7W O \ .dw . c .m, ~. .. w I a rr I N x m I E F- 1 lfl o N M I f?` fn o o d o n < 0 Ul I +o ~~c G •." < U1 I l! i 1 c 0 LI I Ul o c c III C rl ui 1!l r U < O < J O o c 1 .- ( t m 1 L 1 Y i C 9 1 O C y N c d . > W ? 1 i L y d d U a a m L d ~ U N 1 L d 7 r to J7 ~ 7 E nw .. ! N N :rr~ to to 1 v a ,mum o 0 Y o M !o•- N ~M r'1 ~ ~o U5 • o c+ K • a r --rr In Ul ri I~ r~ In !rim > ~fI O f ~ ! V Ui . 0 0 -vrJ N V C ~ m -+ m N 1 O d U i a ~.+ I d v L rod J -. v, L a -. no m L C ~aL •aw m r 1 C C 1 ~ ~ N M i Ln ui c fn . G O Q 1 K I o nJ i r~ I f•l N 1 of I G~ R i r~ 1 0 rYr I 1 ~ 1 r I M I nJ N 1 G O r- PI N m C E 1 y L m i a I d I O I I c 0 z 1 0 o i o i ~~ 7i ~ 0 of Nu .- !p ? <r N •o lfl 7 r .- r- M M U} Lfl 0 0 o In UI - C1+ I'1 O+ V~ r'I ~ d N ~O ~D V1. o U~ r ? r 7 y H 7 7 O O N N L L a m w w N N C C m m L L I- 1- vv c c > > 4- 0. L N d L Y r !-Ci .. N a ~ fn m 0 0 c P m r m ~ r- u (n r m ~ r- c M ~ aJ li l7 1' o P In nJ o U -- ,, m n Ul r P n nJ d 7 Ii d 7 ~i O N L V- L N C m G L 0 r i M ~ try i tl7 t1 m 0 c r OJ M r I N 0 O T C Ja 1 F- 0 F CL z f9 ~- 5 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 27, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Bond Project Status Report COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Attached is a time line for the projected/actual activity of the various work components (Attachment A) and a listing of projects that have been completed (Attachment B). Since many of the bond projects have been completed, this report will be provided on a quarterly basis instead of monthly. Reports will be given in the future during the months of April, July, October and January. FISCAL IMPACT: None. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Questions may be directed to either the specific project coordinator listed on the time line worksheet or John Chambliss. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, ohn M. Chambli Jr. Elmer C. Hodge Assistant County Administrator County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION Motion by: VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Johnson Harrison Minnix Nickens Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ~ O O M O ~fi O cn ~Q+"Op O ~ ~ ~~ N ~; N M b~A N bF} b4 N ~ +-' N ~z~A o~~s ~° o¢ ~ O 'b U ~ a~i G j 'o ~. a H d A U a z rn .--~ Q ~ ~,, N U ~~ dw O W O a U a w Az d U yC A ., ~O a ¢ a ., w ca 0 z H U O o~ W ti ¢ w co w a w a w a W a w a Q a w a z ¢ z ¢ z ¢ z ¢ z a z ¢ z ¢ z ¢ ,.,~ F, U ¢ .a F. U ¢ ,.~ F. U ¢ ,.,1 E.. U ¢ a E. U ¢ ,~ E.. U „¢,~ F., U a ¢ a d w ¢ w ¢ a ¢ a ¢ a ¢ ~ o~ ~ ~ ¢z ¢ H u~aw ~' ~ ~ ~ z~ ~ W ¢~~ w ~ ~ Ha w a wzU a~ A >A ¢m ¢z Q~ p O ~~ ~ oo aU H ~ U ~ ~~b b c~ .o b ~. ~° G"', .O .'r H ~ z ~ .~ O v ~ O O O O O O ~pv'~O O .--i ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~~.+ U ~ PA Z ~ A pq o ~" ~ ~ ~ o ~ `~ ~ ~ d °o a U W U N O a W F A F ~ v a ~ N RS A U z~~ ~¢w W U z 0 E..a U a w c~ z a A z ., ~O a Q w w z ., W A 0 z ,~ F O W rn ~ d ., w c~ A z F Q F ~ F a ¢ a`~. d a Q z 0 Q ~ F ~ W H wH z ~ H ~ U O O a~ O U a .~ x 0 .O a .~ M N O U O ~. .~ a 0 .~ ... c~ a~ O .~ bA .~ a F w /-~ 0 N +?~b G" O O O O O O ~ p O o0 .~-i bR ~ N y ~ ~ ~ ~A ~z~° ~~ ~ o ~ ~ U ~ U O ~ ~ O W U a~i 'o a H A F ~o U ~ ~ N a ~ ,~ ~ ~ ~¢w "~ W W F U a w U' d z A z ., d III ~~I~~ I~IIw ~, W A O z o I~II~ ~~~~Q I~IIti W A W z Q a Q H d z ~ a ¢ F ¢ z ~ a Q F Q z Q a a F d z Q a Q H Q ~ z W O x ~ ~ H z ~W a QW ~~ ~ H .~ wH Wz dz z H ~ U a 0 a 0 O O ..D ~3 .o ~. O ~-: ~ w a~ ~ ~ a, ~~ .~ ~ ~ a~ a ~ o ~", U '~ ~ O O 'C! U '~' U O ~ U ..fin 0 ~ .U 'C o~ "U o ~~ ~~ a '-' o a~ ~. a~ a ... ~ U ~ O ~ .~ ~ N ~ '~ yam,, ~ ~+ U A o F W M ~t°~ 0 0 0 0 z 0 U 0 .b O O U U N ~O ~. a W 7 F U a z °o ~' o `~ 0 0 -d ~~ a W rn d~ ~ N U ~ ~ dw ., 6 `O a Q Q w w ., W Q 0 z „~ F U O W a ., W A z ¢ z ¢ z Q z Q z Q a ¢ a ¢ a d a ~ a"~. Q ca o w w o ca ~~ z ~ ~ E- ~ F N oc w Z Q E~'-~ z vFi z F W F ~U ~O QO O O -~i F x A Fi 0 a w A 3 0 a~i ~ o ~ ~ =~ ~ O ~O bA .., .~ o ~_ ~--~ ~ ~ ~. ~~ ~, ~ .~ o ~ ~ o a~ ~' o ~., ... a ~~ o .~ a~ E~ ~ . ~ .o ,~ .+~' ~". ~ O ~~ ~~ ~~ 0 0 ~ '~ 'd O .b .--~ ~ ~ 9, eC -~ N ;? '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ 9 ~ ~ 'o a~ a~ F W 0 `~.. -~ ~~ o ~ o Q ° ~ o ~ i ~ C7 ~ 'b ~ ~ ~ z ~, ~, °o w !", U 'C ~ O O U U O s.. a W H A F ~o U ~` OQ~ ~4 ~ N N A ~ ~ z ~ ~ o~~ ra¢w `D a d Q w w z d ti U W A O z ,~ F U O a ~a ~ ~ d a U ti F W C7 Q W x d F d W a w a w a w a w a w a w a z d z d z d z d z d z d z d d a F, U d a F U d a F. U d a E, U d a F, U d a E, U d a F. U a d a d a. d a d a d a d w d ~» -' 0 0 H z°~ x a a ~ a ~ a W W~ d ~ F .. ~ E" C~ ~~ wo ~z az ¢W~ ada o w wW~ waz wW~ wao 0 v~U aw a3a x a;a.. xaU F ~- Eo c~ N 'd .., c~ 'd N i a~ c~ 3 r--~ i-i 4-+ O O .', cd c~ a F W 0 ss,~oo °OO° ~ p O N .--i ~ ~ ~ ~ +' N ~--+ •--~ a ~--~ 6R 64 N O ~ ~ ~ '~ 'do~° U ~ ~ U O G," O ~' p., a o ~ ,~ w z O U U W F A H ~ U a` d 0 ~., r N a ~ ,~ U O~~ w¢w O a a z 0 W~ ~4 U x d a z ., ~O a Q ~, W w z ., w A 0 z ~, o ::::>::e~: rn a ~ ~ Q .~ ., W N ~ O ~ ~ ~ O O Q ~ M ~ O ~ ~ ~ 0~0 ~Q A z ~ F z F Q a ¢ a Q a d a ~ Q z w p A w o~z ~ ~C7 U A¢ W wz a zap a '.~ `~v ; a F d OcG~ ~w ¢ Boa o N U a~OO ,~ N O ~ ~ p O N a O sR r~ O u ai o~ o~o~ cad N ~ Q ~~'' N (~ O 'd ~' O `" .-a V ~ ., o ° a ~ ~ a w z 0 U U W l^ A E-+ ~o U a` a ~ N ~N A Sr ~ U z~~ ~~w V] E" ~ O a a z 0 W~ P4 UW a x a a ., d `O a d ~, W w z Q ., w A > o z , ;: ;~; v ~ U o >» ~: ~, w ><~ : <:::: a a ., g ~ z5 vi ~ o ~ F i W ~ r M W ~ ~ p p O~ M ' Q N N U1 d ~ ~ F z F ~ ¢ z '~ ¢ z `~ Q a a a . a . w z a~ ~ O d Q ~ U F ~" W ~ 7 ..l W W p Q O z /-~ U r -.,ate ~,ooo a~~oo 0 0 0 ~ ° 0 0 ~~ ~~~~ z~Q o ,,, PSG o ~ o ~' b U O ~ b U ~ a a~i ~ .~, W 0 a W F A H ~ U a` N A ~ ~ Z V O~~ r~¢w H U O ~4 a 0 z ., Q ~ ~? `O a <` ¢ :::: x ~ W : : w :::: Q .-, :::; ' . w :; A #:' o :::: z :::: ~ F. U :: :::: O E#E ~ W v~ rn C7 d >~ a ~ ., '# :i: :;: w A A H ~ ~ a d a w F W W ~ va W F 0 a~ U a oz Q a o Q U d F rn rn bn .~ a ~, 0 rn o~ -~ U .~ 0 .~ U L: O U 'b a~ A .~ 0 a~ cd cd v-, O .~C .~ ai bA c~ .~ c~ ~, Q .~ a~ U F, o W 3 5 .~ bo O a 00 -~- b w ~n .--i Q CN ~r O 'd C", U 0 ti s.r N z 0 U U i~ O '~ ~. O O U U N O a W F A F V a O °o~ o ~ o~ N M ~ ~ b4 .-~ 6~4 ,~ ~'' ~~ pq A 0 ...~ a~ fil rn rn d~ ~ N U ~~ ~ ~ dw --1 x U x x a 0 W A a w O w x a z a ti d `O a d o~ ~ w w d ti W Q 0 z ,~ F O ~, W Q ., ~ M ~ ~ M Q ~ ~ r ~ z F Q a ~ d a .~ a w 0 H ~z 0 ,~y ~+-r ~-+ ~}Q ~i .ti C~ .ti yJ 0 tin a~ z H W ~-b BOND PROJECT UPDATE Attachment B February 27, 1996 BOND PROJECTS COMPLETED DRAINAGE: Mt. Vernon Heights Sierra Drive/Fenwick Drive Green Valley Mason Creek Phase I PARKS AND RECREATION: Walrond Park Soccer Field Northside Realign Fields Bonsack Park Picnic Shelter Vinyard Park I Light Soccer Field Byrd School -Light Baseball Field Starkey Park - 1 Baseball Field Starkey Park - 2 Baseball Fields Facility Repairs -Walrond Office Infield Surface Materials for Baseball Garst Mill Park Starkey Park -Parking Lot Whispering Pines Park Vinyard Park I Playground ~b Walrond Park 2 Baseball Fields Bonsack Park Ball Field Bonsack Park Playground Equipment Vinyard Park I Parking Green Hill Park - 2 Picnic Shelters Starkey Park -Light 1 Field Facility Repairs -Craig Avenue Center Career Center - Replace Lights Mt. Pleasant Park Brambleton Center Elevator Goode Park Vinyard Park I FIRE HYDRANTS NORTH COUNTY LIBRARY VALLEY TECHPARK 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~-~f AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 27, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Budget Work Session on the Upcoming Annual Budget for FY 1996-97. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This time has been set aside for a budget work session to discuss several items concerning the FY 1996-97 budget. Several of these items have been carried over from the work session originally scheduled for February 13, 1996. This work session will focus on the following items for discussion: • Capital Improvements Program (draft) • Year-End Estimated Revenue and Expenditure Update • BPOL Legislation Update • Fleet Management System/Fleet Replacement (Director-General Services) • Debt Policy (Director of Finance) • Rollovers Budget/Work Session notebooks will be provided and will include detailed information regarding the above mentioned information. Respectfully submitted, ~~~~~ Brent Robertson Budget Manager Approved by, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator a c~ -~ ACTION VOTE Approved () Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied O Eddy _ _ Received () Harrison _ _ _ Referred () Johnson To () Minnix _ _ _ Nickens Coun of Roanoke Budget Work Session FY 1996-1997 r Table of Contents 1. Calendar ........................................... 1-1 2. Summaries .............................................. 3. Expenditures Mid-Year Expenditure Summary .................... 3-1 4. Revenues General Government Revenues -Update FY 95-96 ..... 4-1 General Government Revenues -Projection FY 96-97 ... 4-2 FY 95-96 Amended vs FY 96-97 Proposed ............. 4-3 BPOL Update .................................... 4-4 5. Funded Capital 6. Additional Funding Requests (Addbacks) ...................... . 7. Personnel .............................................. 8. School Budget ............................................. 9. CIP Ranking Criteria/Explanation ....................... 9-1 10. Debt Policy ........................................... 10-1 11. Vehicle Replacement ...................................... . 12. Notes/Miscellaneous ............................. . M:\finance\budget\wodcses\toc.wpd February 22, 1996 ~ r O ~ V ar > • V .J ~ L v ~ ~ L ~ ~ C~ o C ~ G ee a~ ~ v~ a ~ _ c~ '' ~ O W ar ~ U ~ ~ O y = p «S ~ O L ~ ~ ~' ue O ~ O ~ H O Ln ~ :~ ~ s . ~ 6~ p p„i ~ O V O ~ ~ ~ +~"' .`~ y y C O L a 3 ~ ~. bA -v O ~ o ~ L v ~ O ~ cC G. • ~. o ~ ~ ~ ° U ~ C ~ ~ ~ Gr ~ k ~ ~ ca w ~„ ~ «, ~ ~., U.. c ea H ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~+ w on '° ~ a ~,,, ~ o ~-. c, - o - ~_ o ~ p~ o y = o n. w U, vi C y ~ ~ ~ O d ° 3 x °' ~ m ~ .~ ~ ~ 3 L ~ ~ " ~ ~~ ° 3 ~ x ~ .~ w .. ~ ~. ~ -v V] ~ = ~ L O O . C/: ... O d ~~ = ~ O O ~ U m a Q C ~ U m d Q . ^ .°~ v~ ~ ri ~ F, ii ~ L fC '~ G as ~ fi ~D `° ~ ~O ~O ~ . r o ~ ~ o~ v~ U ~ ++ O ~ ~O a ~, ~w ~, o ~ ~ .~ ~ .~ aV ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L ~ ~ •~ R O ~ N i ~ ~ O~ y ~ bA N p y v' L ~ .O ~ ~ .Q ... ~ bA ~ Q • ~ ~ C > ~ c ~ ro ~ c ~ v~ ° ~ 4, - , o ~ °° c a~ ~ ° :° ~ ~ a. ~ '~ ~ c ~ ~' c C N .~ U ~ = ,~ O f M ~ 7 ~ w o ~, L ~ C1. ~, O ~ ~ ° n ° ~" ° en ° c ~ ° ~ . ° a, -o ~ = - ~ U ~ a~ 3 a. ^ a a, ~ ~ -, i a a i L ~ ° ~ ~; ~ O ~ ~ .- o • C7 ~ ~ ~ o a ~~+ ~ L ~ ~ ~ .. CC ~ cn bA = N V) i ~ U G ~ '~ G ~ r... y i"' 0„ Ci U '~ ^ =) w y ^ ~ ~ ~ cC ~ ~ C ~ Gy ~ +~+ 1' Gti . O C ~ O c''-' ~ - ~ y O ~' _ ~ E... vi y ~ .o ~ • ~ O ~ -~ bA L' N ~ ~ U . ~ a~i U O b '~ r Q a ~ C7 m m ;~ a ~:. m .5 a Q m r% E~ a, N ~n O~ ~C ~O ~O ~ ~D ~ O N ~ ~ ~ M ~ N N N M 1-1 County of Roanoke Six Month Expenditure Report as of 12/31/95 Mr. Chairman and Members of the Board: Enclosed you will find the mid-year expenditure report as of December 31, 1995. This report encompasses all Roanoke County operating units within the General Fund. The report contains: • FY 1995-96 budgets • Yeaz-to-Date December 31, 1995 actual expenditures • Percent of budget spent • Estimated surplus/(deficit) at yeaz end As a general benchmark, departments should have spent approximately 50% of their budget through six months. However, while a department may have expenditures that surpass the 50% mark, it is not necessarily an indication that the department will have a deficit at year-end. Likewise, six month expenditures less than 50% of budget are not necessarily a sign that departments will be in good standing at yeaz-end. For this reason, the Budget Department has contacted departmental staff in each area to discuss budget issues and concerns. Based on these conversations, a preliminary estimated surplus/(deficit) has been determined for each area. Areas expressing confidence that they will stay within budget were estimated to have a zero balance at yeaz-end. Some of these areas have exceeded the 50% mark, but in all cases this is attributed to significant budgeted capital or operational items that are non- recurring in the second half of the year. Some areas indicated a belief that they will stay within budget, but that external factors could make this difficult. These azeas are discussed below. In addition they are shaded on the report. Please note that these areas are estimated to have a zero balance at yeaz- end. Only one area (Court Service Unit) indicated that it will overspend it's budget. This area is also shaded on the report and an estimated deficit is provided. It is also discussed below. Grounds Maintenance While fairly positive about its ability to stay within budget, the Grounds Maintenance area believes that continued poor weather conditions could significantly impact their budget. Due to the recent inclimate weather, Grounds Maintenance staff have put in an inordinate amount of overtime hours. If these conditions persist, Grounds Maintenance may have difficulty remaining within budget. Other external factors that may affect Grounds Maintenance's budget include the possibility of a FEMA reimbursement. The status of Grounds Maintenance's budget will be 3-1 monitored, and an updated report will be submitted after the third quarter. Social Services State mid-year allocations have not been distributed as of 2/1/96. If the amount that the state is willing to reimburse the county for social services increases, it may be necessary to increase the budget for the social services area for them to provide the required services. Court Service Unit The report reflects costs incurred only through October 31, 1995 for the Court Service Unit. In actuality, at December 31, 1995, this area had spent approximately 95% of its budget in juvenile detention. Discussions with this area indicate that expenditures are typically higher in the springtime months than in the fall. Based on current expenditure patterns and discussions with departmental staff, an estimated deficit of approximately $171,000 will be incurred. The budget office will continue to review departments expenditures and discuss departmental budget issues and concerns on a quarterly basis. Respectfully Submitted t~--- ~'6-~' Elmer Hodge M:\Finance\Budget\Expndtrs\96midyrm.emo February 13, 1996 ~-2 Roanoke. County ' Mid Year Expenditure Report 1995-96 q,~,~• ~'^L~ `=,"~rf } ': ~ - 1~~ ~ .: „ . -~, Percent.- 1}@partmerrtaC S;" Pral ~ _^. ~~. ~' '~"'~.~ ~ 1445=96" ~ Ezpenditaces ~ Extandod' ~ 1 `Ezpenditri~e b '~Surptus/+att~` K>r:' -~~~~~~_ - - *~?~c..*~:'>Biida'et-?~~%:st?13.4/9~-`•` .'t?13YL~3~;.. ~ : ,• E?coiectiisn I~s'r ~,Qii~le~K:?:,, GENERAL GOVERNMENT Board of Supervisors County Administrator Community Relations Asst County Administrator-Mgt Services Asst County Administrator-Human Services Property Management Human Resources County Attorney Economic Development 236,268 124,202 ! 52.6% 193,320 99,4531 51.4% 118,354 69.4281 58.7% 168,074 85,5611 50.9% 129.739 64,589 ~ 49.8% 85,766 49,1111 57.3% 376,236 171,177 45.5% 299.094 150,789! 50.4% 671,432 491,7131 73.2% 112,066 93,867 48,926 82,513 65,150 36,655 205,059 148,305 179,719 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Constitutional Officers Treasurer i ~ 547,074 ~ 226,7601 41.4% Commonwealth Attorney 470.848 224,496 I 47.7% Vidi~tness 5,146 1,0381 20.2%~ Commissioner of Revenue ~ 578,511 273,742 ! 47.3% i Clerk of the Circuit Court 686,525 303.541 ! 44.2% I Sheriffs Office 1,198,111 649,5461 54.2% I Care ~ Confinement of Prisoners 3.032.23C 1,412,971 ! 46.6% i Judicial Administration Circuit Court i ~ 103,856 16,759 j i 16.1 % j General District Court 34,083. 16,7861 49.3% I Magistrate ~ 1,255 ~ 188 I 15.0% ~ Juvenile ~ Delinquent Court 13.429 ~ 4,426 I 33.0% I 1 Management Services County Assessor i 695,483 ~ 339,827 ! 48.9% j Finance Department I 686,244 296,229 ! 43.2% I Public Transportation j 70,200 27,851 i 39.7% Management and Budget ; 169,507 53,084; 31.3% j Procurement Services I 330,950 i 129,331 , 39.1 Public Safety j ' I Police ! 5,492,575' 2,878,3641 52.4% I Transportation Safety Commission 960 i 64 I 6.7% I E911 Maintenance 423,717 132.623 l 31.3% I Fire and Rescue 4.273.964 2.322,414 ~ 54.3% , I Community Services General Services Solid Waste ~~ I Engineering and Inspections D'ode Caverns Project Building Maintenance i1 Handicapped Access Building Pennds/Oevelopment Services Planning and Zoning Planning Commission i Public Health Institutional Care Social Services Organizations Contributions-Human Service Orgs. Contributions-Cultural Orgs. Ubrary VPI Extension Elections TOT?,L GENERAL f 02/02/96 08:59 AM m:\finance\budget\expndtrs\M1DYR_96.WK4 493,832. 213,775 I 43.3% i 3.375,502 1,563,7891 46.3% ~ 2,560,527 1,261,0541 49.2% 1 280,908 ~ 34,451 I 12.3% I 1,380.983' 599,7211 43.4%i 35.531: 10,373 I 29.2% 1 215,291 102,8631 47.8% I 561,408 I 262.648 I 46.8% I 20,612 ' 11,2261 54.5% i 1,317,939 I 625,5061 47.5% 425.333' 01 0.0°~ 30,500 i 18.123 I 59.4% 119,332' 59,6661 50.0°k 82.213. 72,1001 87.7% I 188,526 ~ 185,251 I 98.3% 1,588,188 694,8921 43.8%I 72,769 , 17,664 24.3% j 201,336 ~ 98,6891 49.0% I 9.081,354 ~ 8.906.676 ' 48.4% 320,314 246,352 4,108 304,769 382,984 548.565 1,619,259 87,097 I 0 I 17,297 0 ~ I 1,067 0 9,003 0 ~26000' ~`r" _~_~'69~ 355,656 I 0 ~ 390,015 0 i 42,349 0 I 116,423 0 201,619 0 2,614,211 0 I 896 OI 291,094 0 i 1,951, 550 0 280,057 1.811,713 1,299,473 246,457 781,262 25,158 112,428 298,760 9,386 425,3331 4~' 12,377 59,666 10,113 3,275 893,296 55,105 102,647 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 20,346,547 ~ '171 3-3 Roanoke County ' Mid Year Expenditure Report 1995-96 4 ~C~T~'T~ N ~ E i{}XL ~ , ~ ~~ kT~?~,~ L` ~~ ;, ~ ~ ~~ ~'s.:~ "t ~ !~N^^' „y{i•~* .e'~~~'r~ '~'t`~",~YSD~ ~y `` N~ ~t ~ r` even e' Y eF 'F ~ D partm tt~~t$ ~-~~~F IC'F1\~y ~, ,~~- nacY?'~:._ ' f ~" '~'"',, -' !~" ~ ,,, ".-~. Y ~`" ~'L~'~ ~ ti-96 . ~ t-_ itpenditutas~ Expended- Ezpendltunar ~Sttrpitts! ~~, , ,~ -,r ~ t . &'~.= Bu et" :~f~13119~"::~ t2t3iTt95' ,P:>»o eCtloih:^" -5:~' OTHER SUB-FUNDS ~ Youth Haven II 405,198 ; 187,742 I 46.3% 217.456 ~ I 0 Law Library I 41,980 I 17.1141 40.8% 24.866 ~ 0 Recreation Fee Chases I 888,8091 379,031 42.6% 509.778 i 0 Internal Services Management Information Systems 953,629 I 502,072 ! 52.6% i 451,557) 0 Communications ~ 574,750. 290,823 i 50.6% ~ I 283.927 ! 0 Garagell 257,278' 132,0031 51.3%I 125.275 0 TOTAL OTHER SUB-FUNDS ~ 3,121,644'. 1,508,T85i 48.3%i 1,612.8591 I OI ~ ~ I i TOTAL GENERAL FUND 42,202,998' 20.415.461 ~ 48.4°h 21,959.4061 (171,869)1 Notes: (1 } Total for General Fund indudes subfund of "General Government" and "Other Sub-Funds" as listed. Does not incluoe inventory accounts, confiscat (2) Encumbrances are induded in the YTD Expenditures figure. (3) Shading denotes a potential for overexpenditure in a given area. This is based on conversations held with departmental staff in each cost center. (4) A conservative final balance of zero has been listed for each department which expressed confidence in being able to stay within its budget. (5) Currently, the Court Service Unit is the only known area which WILL run a defidt at year end. 02/02/96 08:59 AM m:lfinancelbudgetlexpndtrs\MIDYR 96.WK4 3-4 CC ~ D O ~ C ~ ~ ~ y O~ aa~ ~+' ~ L o ~ U ~ 0 CC L C ~ ~ ~ ~ ._~ U ~ o .Q C N Q N N .~ C ~ ~ CA ~ ~ N O~ .~ ~ "C G~ O~ .-. o ~ ti ~ c~ ~ Q ~ t}., O _ ~ O ~ ~ ~p Q ~"' w Vl cd Di ~ ~ Q >"' LL c~ D ~ M Q LL. o o ~ ~ o ° p o ° ° o ° ° ~ ov'~ cc ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 - ~ ~ ~ ~ O O ~ M ~.,~ [~ ~ a0 ... ~ x O N ~ M N ~ v', N N N ~ O N ~ ~ ~ ~ v'~ ~ O ~ - O N ~D M i O C C O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r', 0 0 0 oo ~ ~O C C C O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C J M ~T I~ C C O O O O O C O 0 0 0 0 vl N O O 00 O ~ O C C O 0 0 0 vi vi O v'i O vi t~ [~ C O~ N O O O ~ C O O O O O [~ N ~ N ~ 00 ~ DD ~^, 00 oC O D\ ~ 00 C !"'. N DD ~ N ~' 00 ~/'~ ~-^ N N ~ M N ~/'~ ^~ N ~ \O ~ r`1 V) M M - N - V"1 C~ M ~- 00 O C C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M O M O ^ .:: 0 0 0 0 O O O C O 0 0 O 00 O 00 O C O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 oo v", 00 O O C "' O O O C ~n O ~n O O ~- O oo C U O O O C c` l M 0 0 ~ Ir ~ N O ~ M O M - ~ O M 00 00 - ~. ~ .... .~ .,.i .--. .._. .~ ._ .... 00 69 ~ ~ _. O C C O O O O O O O O O O O O M O O O N 0o M O O C O O O O O O O O O O O O C O C O v'1 mot' O~ O C C O ~ O O O O O O O O O O vl N N ~l 0 01 O ~ O C O O O O ~n O O O O ~n ~O t~ C O - 0 0 0 v'~ O C 7 M O O ~ ~ ~ O O ~ `ct M 00 ~„ u1 t~ O l~ ~0 00 C N N M I~ 00 N ~ ~O ~O O ^- M V~ 'ct N Vl - d' vl I~ 'J~ ~D N ~ M N - N ^- U1 - '~ - 6R 69 o - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 N o0 "t [~ O o0 ~ M N 00 N 00 DO 00 N ~°.,, N 00 ~ N Q~ M ^ Q~ V'1 M O N ~-- N ~' N M O O~ N - ~ M Q~ \D 00 ~ M ~ N t~ V' d' 00 M ~ M ~O [~ N '~!' M M M OO ~ N -~ N o ~t t~ ~ oo .- o0 o t~ c M - t~ o, N o Q~ N '7 I~ t~ ~ ~ ~ ~O eY (~ M M N - M ~ M M v'~ ~D 00 ~ r"; t ~ U1 `C ~D N M M 00 O ~O N C O N N N ~D ct 00 M ~; M 00 ~ N M M ~ I~ ~f1 Ul 'cr M o0 t~ M Ch ^~ O~ O 00 ^7 ---~ ~O 'V' 00 ~ V~ O~ N N N Q~ ~ l~ ~t N N t~ N Q~ N N --- N I N ~ ~ ~ N ~O ~C 00 ~- ~!1 ~ O v1 ~ 00 M ~!'1 M 00 ~- [~ t~ ~O M [~ [~ M f'~ N 00 E N O ~O 00 01 [~ M M M O v^ V~ `^. N ['~ O ~ a0 - O ~ O Q~ N N t~ ~D M v~ C ~ ~ ~ 00 O o0 - C ~ U1 t/') tI') 00 O~ O~ N 00 N ~O -- ~7 C M ~ M M ~ I [~ ~ ~ J O M -- -- ~ (~ ~p O ~- l~ rf M ~L N 00 ~-- O~ [~ ~C N vl ~--~ M - N N N N M - 00 69 6A 00 ~-- r~ M t~ M t~ ~--~ M --~ ~p O N o0 M N oo v ; O O~ oo N N 00 M N N ~/'~ ~O M N e}' V') ~/'~ O ~O v; O N d' M l~ ~O ~O o0 [~ ~O 00 ~ M N ~ O O 00 M ^- C V~ ~ O M Q~ 00 c'i O - l~ O vi ~D oo ~ t~ [~ vi ~ n ~ ~ N N ~D o0 N ~ r'^. v'1 ~D mot' M ~t ~O O ~-- N o0 N C cl' C M O Q1 ~ I~ ~D - Q~ V~ ~ d~ [~ v~ O N tr1 M - M ~ d' ~O ~O --~ M I DD ~ I 6A >C c~ y ~ ~ i >' ~ X 'l. >C y< VI ~ v i ~ ;, ~ ` 'J L k ~ ~ ~ ...~ "'~ ~ ~ k' ~ py ~ N ~ .r.. ~ , mo o -~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ° o ~ b 3 y . o x c G . ~ ~ c ~ r ~ ~ ~ 5 ~ o o ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ N ~ ~ - ~ ` .. ...a m m c~ ~ N O 4-1 O 0 0 0 0 o c ~ o ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 = _ o c ~ ~ Q\ ~ O i ~ `: O O O ~ i ~ ~ M ~ ~ O iN Q~ O O - ~ ~ ~O ~ i i i O O O O C C O O C O 0 0 0 0 0 V1 O O O ~--~ C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 O O O~ C N y O O O O O C O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~t M ~ N C ~ ~ ti ~' ~ O O N O O O O t/1 O H O ~--~ O ~ O~ N O~ to ~p ~ O O [~ M Q~ v ; ~ O N v'~ N N M ~/'~ M ~ vl G1 ~D V N N "~ iI'1 .~ n ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 .-• 00 ~ ~ o o o O C c o o c o o o o o o o o o o ~c ~ .~ O O O O C O O O C O 0 0 0 0 ~ 00 ~I't O O M O N ~ ~ ~, [~ O O ~n O O O v'i O v'~ O ~n U'i l~ ~ N D\ ~ O ~--~ vl N ~ y O~ O O ^ O G~ v'+ O ~ v1 ~ V'1 l~ O~ `O M M O~ l~ O ~--~ v1 V7 ~, O CJ) `p O~ 00 't7 M 00 C`J N ~t o0 v'1 ~--~ N N v'1 V' N ~/'1 ~--~ ~ ~ '~t o ~ ~, ~ w w ~ ~ o c s~ ~ ~ ee ~ ~ a w ~ a ~ c ~ C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M O O O N 00 M ' W O O O O O C O O C O 0 0 0 0 0 Q~ O O O N ~ O~ b +., ~ O O O O O C O O O O O O O O V1 N N ~ O ~ O ~f' V ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ' O O O O O C O vi O O O O vi ~D [~ O~ O ~-+ O O O V1 Ll. V 1 O O V' M O V1 ~ v1 O O N mot' M 00 ~ ~ (~ O [~ ~ 00 O ~ O~ O N N M ~ oC N ~ ~ ~ O ~--~ M V'~ et N v'~ ~--~ ~ ~ [~ ~ ''" O~ ~O N v'1 M N --~ N ~--~ ~ .--~ ~ i. C x F- a~ x, U C~ ~ N ~ y ~ ~ ~ H ~ X c3 ~ r ~ X ~ C O X _U ~ ~ v ~ ~ ~ cis ~ U c~ ~ a a > ~ ~ ~ ~ R3 ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ O ~ Q ~ " ~ O y ~ vi ~ 'J ,~ ~ :--~ O ~ yNj ~ ~ N ~ O U cC Cr ... ~, ~ ~ a o ~ a~ ~ o , r ~ >~ ~ O ~, o .~ x a ~ ~ o o ,~ o p o c ~ 3 , ~ gy , C~ '~ CAS O ~ C~ .'". .~ ~. ~ O Q) ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ Q) O ~ U O ~ ~J J .~.. CC ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ rQ ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ i r. U pr ~ ~ U ~ ~.. U a .-~ M N O 4-2 dA as y O a hp. a o ~ ~o ~ ~ ~ O ~ W ~ ~ ~+' 7 bD C ~ b >~ ~a`~ b "O C Q o~ w o ~+ o 0 0 0 0 ~ o 0 0 0 \ o c c ~ ~ o o c o o c p M [~ M Q~ ~ 0 0 0 ~ N C 00 O ~ N ~O ~: O ~? M N V vi ~ N ~-» N ~ O O M. ~ -- ~ O O ,N_, v i M '"~' O M O M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O C O O O O ~1 O O O 'cr O. ~ O O O O O C O O C O O O 00 O O [~ OI ~ L~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O C O O O '~t ~ O ~ OI ~ CS ~ O O U'i O O O vi v'i vi v'i O O ~O O 00 O~ v~ I ~C p O O ul 0 ~ v~ N N N N ^ v1 M ~--~ ~ [~ `-~i ~ M ~--~ 00 ~--~ N ~ .--• 00 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 .~ oo ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~c ~r r- [~ ^C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 v'~ 00 v-~ O O M O N ~ ~ O O vi O O C O v'i O vi O vi vi [~ [~ N O~ d~ O ~ vi N p O O ~ O ~ ~ O ~ ~/'~ [~ ~ ~ O~ ~O M M O~ [~ O --~ N N ~ o~ 00 ~ M 00 N N ~ 00 ~ --~ N N v1 d' N N ~--~ ~ ~ ~ L ~ ~ N vi M M ^ N ~--~ v~ ^ ~ w a ~ ~ O O O O O O O O O O C O O O O M O 0 0 V'1 00 ~O O O O O O G O O O O O O O O O O O O O M t} l~ ~p "O) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~/'~ N 0 0 0 0o O ~O ~ .a O O O O O C O ~n v'i O v~ O vi [~ t~ O~ O~ N O O O v~ ~ C O O ~O O O O O t~ N ~ N ~ 00 ~G 00 ~O 00 00 O O~ ~O ~ ~ a,i o0 O M N o0 v~ N ~t oo v1 -~ N N v1 M N v1 ~--~ ~n V ~D ~pll O~ [~ N ~ M M ~--~ N ~-+ ~1 •--~ [~ w dl ~ I ~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M O M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O o0 O 00 y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O C O 0 0 0 0 00 ~ 00 O ~--~ p~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ O vi 0 0 0 00 O O~ O~ O C CC O O N M O O N t~ V'~ N O ~O M O M ~--~ ~--~ ~ yg ~ ~ N a~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M O O O N 00 M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O~ O O O v1 'ct I O~ .-. O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ~1 N N ~!1 O Q~ O ~ ?~ C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 v'i 0 0 0 0 vi ~O [~ O~ O ^ 0 0 0 ~!1 O O ~ M O O N ~ ~ O C tI') ~' M oo ~ N (~ O [~ ~ I o0 ~ .bA O N N M t~ 00 N ~ ~O ~ O --~ M v-~ d' N ~ ~- ~ ~ I [~ yy i. O~ ~O N v1 M N ~--~ N ~ N .-~ ~ ~ ~ °A ~ ~ ~ H >, >' a ~ ~, a~ a~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~, c~ ~ ~ ~ .~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a, o n o '~ ~ '' a o c x a ~ ~o o w c~ 3 °~' .. v ~ a. v~ U ~ ~ ' • ~ 5 ;~ s, O ~ v~ ~ ~ ~ ai ~c~aO~..a~maa~rxx~UOaa.~U~c~U~.=, H ~_ M N O 4-3 MEMORANDUM TO: Members, Board of Supervisors (~ FROM: Brent Robertson, Budget Manager `/ DATE: February 27, 1996 SUBJECT: BPOL Legislation Update On Tuesday, February 13, 1996, the House and Senate passed the Brickley BPOL legislation and forwarded it to the Governor for his signature. If signed, the effective date will be January 1, 1997 and will impact Roanoke County's revenue projections for FY1996-97. There are a number of components to this legislation; however, fiscal impact will be reviewed in the body of this memo. Threshold provisions have been included that will affect individual localities differently depending on total population and actual receipts of particular businesses located within that locality. The thresholds identified are as follows: Population 0 to 25,000 25,001 to 50,000 50,001 or greater Business Receipts Threshold NA $50,000 or less $100,000 or less Maximum Fee Allowed NA $50 $100 As shown above, the proposed legislation will not affect localities with populations of 25,000 or less. Roanoke County falls into the last category, due to a population of approximately 81,500. This means that businesses in our locality with gross receipts equal to or less than $100,000 are exempt from paying BPOL taxes. Also, we have the option of imposing up to a $100 license fee, not only on the businesses that are exempt under the threshold, but also on all other businesses as well. However, the $100 fee must be rolled back to $50 by January 1, 2000. 4-4 Fiscal Impact -Roanoke County (based on 1995 filings and assessments) FY1994-95 BPOL revenues totaled $3,159,000. The County has approximately 4,800 business license accounts. 4,029 of these accounts report gross receipts of $100,000 or less. Total Projected Revenue Loss from proposed legislation Option Not Imposing License Fee $100 fee only on exempt businesses $100 fee on all businesses Additional Revenue $0 $402,900 $480,000 $(458,000) Net County Gain Loss $(458,000) $(55,100) $22,000 The optional license fees referred to above are "not to exceed" amounts; therefore, any amount below this $100 ceiling could be imposed, at the Board's discretion. 4-5 `D ~ a.~ E ~EGISL~TIVE ~al' ~OLLETIN February 15, 1996 LOCAL GOVERNMENT OFFICiALS~ RAY SPECIAL EDITION This is a special edition legislative update prepazed for the February 15, 1996 Local Government Official's Legislative Day for which over 6501oca1 officials preregistered. The primary focus of this report is to highlight a limited number of key issues that survived the February 13 cross-over day and require close attention over the balance of the session. LOCAL GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS LEGISLATIVE DAY-SCHEDULE OF EVENTS 1:00 p.m. Registration 2:00 p.m. Del. Tayioe Murphy -Tributary Strategies and Chesapeake Bay Act 2:30 p.m. William Leighty - V'RS Changes and Pending Legislation 3:00 p.m. Del. Thomas M. Jackson, Jr. - JuvenileJustice Reform 3:30 p.m. Lt. Gov. Donald S. Beyer, Jr. x:00 p.m. Staff Update on Local Government Bills 5:U0 p.m. Adjourn 5:30 p.m. to Reception Honoring 1996 7:00 p.m. General Assembly Members enact a uniform BPOL ordinance will pass the 1996 General Assembly. HB 293 (Brickley) and SB 587 (Stosch) have each passed .~ieir respective houses and contain identical provisions at this point. VML had generally supported the provisions of the bill, which were based on the work of a joint subcommittee charged with finding ways to improve the administration of the tax. V1IL had, however, consistently opposed the threshold provision, and also objected to a proposed exemption for software developers and expansion of the appeals process to other business taxes. The compromises on these issues embodied irl HB 293 and SB 587 are as follows: Threshold. Localities with populations of 25,000 or less are not required to enact a threshold of any kind. Localities with populations of 25,001 to 50,000 must enact a X50,000 threshold, which means that any business with gross receipts of $50,000 or less will be exempt from paying the BPOL tax. However, those localities may impose a $50 license fee not only on the businesses that are exempt under the threshold, but also on all other businesses as well. For the businesses whose gross receipts exceed the threshold, the fe can be imposed in addition to the BPOL tax they, are 3~" alreadv,~a;ring. This option was included in the bill as a way to offset the revenue losses a locality will incur due to the Threshold. Localities with populations of 50,001 or greater must enact a 100,000 threshold and may enact up to a $100 fee. However the ~ 100 fee must be rolled back to X50 ~ byJanuary 1, 2000. BPOL BILL ON ITS WAY TO PASSAGE; ~ LOCALITIES UNDER 25,000 POPULATION EXEMPT FROM TNRESNOLD After weeks of negotiating it appears that legislation which will require some local governments to adopt a threshold exempting small businesses from the BPOL tax, and will require ~j local governments to * jn~ > 11{-Jllj'J Software exemption. In the original bill, companies that develop or design software would have been considered to be manufacturers, exempting them from the BPOL tax. This would have resulted in significant revenue losses in some localities, and would also have set an extremely bad precedent by broadening the types of activities considered to be manufacturing. A ~ 4-6 Under the compromise, language is added to clarify that manufacturing includes "assembly of materials or components to produce a different product." Local assessment officials have said that this does not represent a significant departure from the way the law is currently interpreted. Regarding the design and development of softwaze, language granting this type of business an exemption has been stricken from the bill, and replaced with language that gives a locality the authority to grant an exemption. BPOL appeals process. The original proposal would have subjected all business taxes (BPOL, personal property, merchants capital and machinery and tools) to the newly created BPOL appeals process, which allows a taxpayer to appeal a decision to the state Tax Commissioner. Under the compromise, the appeals process is limited to the BPOL tax only. The appeals process would not apply to other taxes until January 1, 2000, and then only if the provision were reenacted by the General Assembly. TALK TO YOUR LEGISLATORS ABOUT BUDGET AME1iDMElVTS~ The subcommittees of the Senate Finance and House Appropriations Committees will report their budget recommendations to their respective committees Sunday, February 18. While they're in town local officials should take advantage of this opportunity to urge legislators to amend the budget to address various Iocal concerns which are outlined below: S,omprehensive Services Act. Unless amended by the General Assembly, the revised budget bill for Lw F~'96 and the proposed budget biIl for 1996-98 will ~ shift more of the costs of the Comprehensive {~ Services Act from the state to local governments. When the Act was initiated 2 1/2 years ago, local governments were assured this would not happen. If the legislature does not reverse the cost-shifting measures proposed by the Governor, it could result in the largest unfunded mandate on local governments since teacher salary mandates. It is critical that the General Assembly amend the budget to eliminate the state's ability to prorate funds (including FY96), and restore the current formula to calculate local match rates. It should also add funds in FY97 to provide a more realistic appropriation for this program. Local officials should talk to these legislators about CSA: Senate Finance Health and Human Resources Subcommittee: Sens. Gartlan (chair), Lambert, Mazye, Houck, Wampler, Miller, Earley House Appropriations Education Subcommittee: Councill (chair), VanLandingham, Cunningham, Christian, Jackson, Bloxom, Guest. ~ HB 599. If the General Assembl does not amend e overnor's budget, 103 towns, 29 cities and 3 counties will see their local law enforcement ~a~s''~ fundin (HB 599) decrease. is is ecause n~,a~yl'' updating the forrnu a wi more current information redistributes what has been a fixed amount of funding for five yeazs. Some localities gain, but most localities lose. Budget aniendments have been submitted that would: increase funding in FY97 by 53.2 million to ensure that no locality will receive less HB X99 funds in FY97 than it receive in b. oc ities t at benefit from the use of more current data will see their :ending increase in FY97. Add an additional 53.2 million in FY98 so that HB 599 funds increase in accordance with the Cade requirement that says the amount to be distributed shall increase each year based an the same percentage by which state general fund revenues are expected to grow (~ 14.1- 84.4). Local officials should talk to these legislators about HB 599 funding: Senate Finance Public Safety Subcommittee: Sens. Holland (chair), Gartlan, Marge, Waddell, Stosch, Benedetti, Hawkins; House Appropriations Public Safety Subcommittee: Dels. Croshaw !chair), Plum, Robinson, Jackson, Woodrum, Hams, Bloxom, Putney Work Force Transition Act costs. Sen. Colgan has introduced a budget amendment that would require the state to assume responsibility for any employee buyout costs associated with the Work Force tt>y Transition Act, which was passed last year as a way h'~ to downsize state governments. In the case of (', health department employees, localities have been ,,~.~ expected to assume a share of the retirement costs for these employees. Colgan's amendment would make the state fully liable for these costs. VMLNACo legislative Day Bulletin Page 2 4-7 4-7 Roanoke County Criteria & Measure Definition CIP Prioritization Process A capital improvements program (CIP) is a five year plan to guide the construction or acquisition of capital projects. It identifies needed capital projects, estimates their costs, and ranks them by riori This year, a new ranking procedure will be used in Roanoke County. Each project will be prioritized using a more objective system than in past years. A series of weighted criteria will be used in conjunction with a number of related measures (each of which is assigned a point value) to determine a project's priority. A detailed explanation is provided below. Cri eria• There aze ten weighted criteria used in this process. These criteria aze drawn from a number of sources including other localities, budgeting texts and handbooks. Similarly, the weights assigned to each of these criteria are consistent with the sources listed above. A brief discussion of the criteria follows. 1. Urgent Need-Other than Health and Safety (Weight = 4)--Will seriously effect work efficiency, levels of service, quality of service, or causes a serious inconvenience to the public. 2. Public Health and Safety (Weight = S)-- Will eliminate serious threat to public health or safety and/or reduce potential county liability. 3. Fiscal Impact (R'eight = 2)-- Specifically addresses the project's impact on operating costs. 4. Legal Requirements (Weight = 4) -- Addresses a specific legal requirement or state or federal mandate. 5. Relationship to Comprehensive Plan (Weight = 2) -- Addresses the project's consistency with established plans and goals for Roanoke County through the Comprehensive Plan. 6. Relationship to Other Projects (Weight = 3) -- Addresses how the project complements or completes another project. Also relates to project's impact on departmental functions. 7. Economic Development Impact (Weight = 3) -- Attempts to measure the direct benefit of an economic development project. 8. Extent of Service Area (Weight =1) -- Addresses the number of people to benefit from the project and/or the geographic area served by the project. 9. Citizen Support (Weight = 3) -- Addresses the perceived level of citizen recognition and support of a given project. 10. Departmental Priority (Weight =1) -- Takes into account the priorities of the department submitting the projects. Measures: Measures aze the more specific components which attempt to capture the essence of each criteria. Again, the measures included on the prioritization worksheet were developed in a manner M:\finance\cip\ciprank.mem Februan l3, 1996 9-1 consistent with other localities and CIP handbooks. Each measure is assigned a point value from zero to two(see prioritization scoring key for point values). Worksheet Procedure: The prioritization worksheet (Attachment 1) will be distributed to the CIP committee. Each member will complete one worksheet for each project. For each criteria, one measure must be chosen. Based on the number of points assigned that measure and the weight for the associated criteria(Attachment 2--Scoring Key), a score for that criteria is tabulated. The total score for a project is the sum total of all criteria scores. The average of the committee's scores will represent the project score. Projects azll then be prioritized based on these scores. This information will be collected by the budget office and summarized in a prioritized grid. The information will then be distributed to the County Administrator and the Board of Supervisors for review and discussion. The information will serve as supporting documentation for the County Administrator and the Board as they establish CIP priorities for the five year planning period. The County Administrator and the Board of Supervisor's role in this process will be significant. As with any governmental process, there are a number of extraneous subjective factors that will not fit within the scope of an objective procedure. This prioritization measure is intended as further support to be used in conjunction with knowledge of the current political climate and other external factors that may be more subjective in nature. M:\finance\cip\ciprank.mem February 13. 1996 9-2 CIP Prioritization Worksheet Attachment 1 Roanoke Count~~ FY 1997-2001 (1) Urgent \eed -- Other than Health and afety (a) Lack of project results in a major limitation on delivery of services (b) Lack of project results in a minor limitation on delivery of services (c) Lack of project results in no limitation on delivery of services (?} Public Health and Safetv (a) Prevents or corrects an imminent/major health or safety hazard in the County. (b) Prevents or corrects a minor health or safety hazard in the County. (c) Addresses no hazard. ^ (3) Fiscal Impact (a) Significantly reduces operating costs. (b) Increases operating costs initially, but costs are offset by new efficiencies. (c) Slightly reduces operating costs (d) Has no effect on operating costs. (e) Increases operating costs and does not improve efficiencies. (4) Legal Requirements (a) Project is legally required within 2 years. ^ (b) Project is legally required after 2 years. (c) Project is not legally required. ^ (5) RelationshiR to Comprehensive Plan (a) Project meets or conforms with Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. (b) Project does not conform but does not conflict with Comprehensive Plan. (c) Project conflicts with Comprehensive Plan ^ M:\finance\cip\CIPRANK.97 9-3 • CIP Prioritization Worksheet Roanoke County FY 1997-2001 (6) Relationship to Other Projects (a) Completes and existing project (b) Is essential to success of other existing projects (c) Project has significant positive impact on delivery of services of other departments. (d) Project does not complete or complement other projects/departmental services. (7) Economic Development Impact (a) Project directly increases net annual fiscal resources. (b) Project directly responsible for retaining current level of resources. (c) Project has no direct impact on level of fiscal resources. (8) Extent of Service Area (a) Project benefits entire County (b) Project benefits multiple neighborhoods. (c) Project benefits single neighborhood. (d) Project benefits single facility (9) Citizen SuRport (a) Project has public recognition and support (b) Project improves public perception of good local government (c) Project is not supported by citizenry. (10) Departmental Priority (a) High (b) Medium (c) Low Note: Each project should be evaluated using this form M:\finance\ciplCl PRAN K.97 Attachment 1 D 9-4 c ~ ~ CIP Prioritization Scoring Key Attachment 2 Roanoke County FY 1997-2001 (1) isJrgent Need -- Other than Health and Safety Weight = 4 (a) Lack of project resulu in a major limitation on delivery of services 2 Points (b) Lack of project resulu in a minor limitation on delivery of services 1 Point (c) Lack of project results in no limitation on delivery of services 0 Points (2) Public Health and Safety Weight = 5 (a) Prevenu or correcu an imminent/major health or safety hazard in the County. 2 Points (b) Prevenu or correcu a minor health or safety hazard in the County. 1 Point (c) Addresses no hazard. 0 Points (3) Fiscal Impact Weight =2 (a) Significantly reduces operating cosu. 2 Points (b) Increases operating cosu initially, but cosu are offset by new efficiencies. 1 Point (c) Slightly reduces operating cosu I Point (d) Has no effect on operating cosu. 0 Points (e) Increases operating costs and does not improve efficiencies. 0 Points (4) Legal Requirements Weight = 4 (a) Project is legally required within 2 years. 2 Poinu (b) Project is legally required after 2 years. 1 Point (c) Project is not legally required. 0 Poinu (5) Relationship to Comprehensive Plan Weight = 2 (a) Project meets or conforms with Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. 2 Poinu (b) Project does not conform but does not conflict with Comprehensive Plan. I Point (c) Project conflicts with Comprehensive Plan 0 Points M:\finance\cip\IIVT&PTS.CIP 9-5 CIP Prioritization Scoring Key Attachment 2 Roanoke County FY 1997-2001 (6) Relationship to Other Prgjects Weight = 3 (a) Completes and existing project 2 Points (b) Is essential to success of other existing projects 2 Points (c) Project has significant positive impact on delivery of services of other departments. 1 Point (d) Project does not complete or complement other projects. departmental services. 0 Points (7) Economic Development ImRct Weight = 3 (a) Project directly increases net annual fiscal resources. 2 Points (b) Project directly responsible for retaining current level of resources. I Point (c) Project has no direct impact on level of fiscal resources. 0 Points (8) Extent of Service Area Weight = 1 (a) Project benefits entire County 2 Points (b) Project benefits multiple neighborhoods. 1 Point (c) Project benefits single neighborhood. I Point (d) Project benefits single facility 0 Points (9) Citizen Support Weight = 3 (a) Project has public recognition and support 2 Points (b) Project improves public perception of good local government 1 Point (c) Froject is not supported by citizenry. 0 Points (10) Departmental Priority Weight = 1 (a) High 2 Points (b) Medium 1 Point (c) Low 0 Points M:\finance\cip\Wf8~PTS.CIP 9-6 ,~ r .._, ~ interoffice M E M O R A N D U M to: Board of Supervisors Elmer Hodge from: Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance subject: Debt Policy date: February 20, 1996 One of the measures of a fiscally well managed locality is the adoption of formal fiscal policies. Many localities aze currently in the process of developing these policies, however those that have actually adopted them are fairly limited. I would like to develop a series of financial policies over the next few years. The first of these is the enclosed debt policy. I chose this policy first, because as you will see when you review the data, the County is nearing a critical phase in debt management. Whenever the County issues bonds, the rating agencies (Moody's and Standard & Poor's) review the County's ability to repay the debt. This ability is reflected in the rating that is assigned to the County. The County is currently rated Aa/AA by the agencies, which is the next to the highest rating offered. The main factor that deprives the County of the Aaa/AAA rating is our commercial /residential ratio. The rating agencies measure a locality's level of debt through three ratios: 1) Net debt per capita -This is the outstanding debt principal to be paid from general tax dollars (excluding debt paid from the water and sewer operations) divided by the population. 2) Net debt to assessments -This is the outstanding debt principal as explained in 1) divided by the mazket value assessment of all the property (real and personal) located in the County. 3) Debt Service to general fund expenditures -This is the debt service (principal and interest) paid in a year divided by the total general and school expenditures. While there is no ideal level to set these ratios, a review of other localities policies show a close range of acceptable levels. The level should be set realistically with the intention of staying within that level. Attachment A is a comparison of other localities debt policy ratios and actual debt ratios. In the 10-1 Board of Supervisors Page 2 February 20, 1996 Projected Roanoke County Column (far right), I am suggesting what the County ratios should be, and showing what the actual ratios will be in 1998 after the proposed referendum debt is issued. In comparison with other localities, we will have the highest Debt per Capita ratio and the highest Net Debt to Assessment ratio. These ratios will need to be considered before any future debt can be planned. New debt will need to be planned to coincide with the retirement of existing debt and the growth in assessments so that these ratios are not exceeded. Attachment B is a ten year history of the net bonded debt to assessment ratio and the net bonded debt per capita ratio, and a three year projection of these ratios. The County net debt will be four times greater in 1998 than it was in 1986. In 1998, the County will be near the ceiling of the debt ratios. We will no longer be able to issue large amounts of debt on an annual basis. We will have to carefully time additional debt issuances and make sure they meet the most demanding concerns. Attachment C is a ten year history of the General long term debt to General expenditures ratio, and a three year projection of these ratios. This ratio appears more favorable, but it is influenced by the fact that all of our expenditures are increasing every year, and therefore has a compounding effect on the County taxpayers. I will be forwardin a co y of this policy to our bond council and financial advisors for their g p input. We will be discussing this debt policy as part of the budget work session on February 27, 1996. • 10-2 • i• i• Q L ~~ _T ~ C V O M U .~ co m Y O Q ~ ~ ~I C O C 'O ~ 7 J O C O d U Q _ ~ m Q ~ + w+ o m tV Q U O O ~ Y 4 ~ ~ U O m ~ C U ~ C O •~ U ~ a Q L O tV0 .>'+ N U ~vl Q a~ Q c Q o ~ =U Q ° ~ Q _a U Q m m ~~ a Q .~ O 0 O c In o ~ C7 ~ V V V a> x v~ m m E o a 00 p M O N ~_ V y ~~ v ~ o ~,.~ O v ~ O O e 0 ~ c C7 ~ ~ ~-i ~ ~ ~ v ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ o ~ o ~ N v ~ v 0 o ~ M V v 0 o a N ~ ER V V v y N N ~ ~ N E ~ ~ O a O ~ o ~ d ~ ~ C ~ U a~ R ` ~ ` y ~ E m ~ m ~ ~~- U y m a i rn a i m o y Q $ $ ~ O. O U • V • ~ _ ~ ~ ~ N ~ N a 0 ~ ~ N Z N Z .~ N ~ ~ N D N Z M o a N ~ N N bq N CO a0 0 0 M cD O o 0 ~ O N M O ~ EA O 0 M O o 00 c0 0 O ~ N (D ~ 0 0 N h p O M ~ N V O ~ o o a N O O ~ ~ ~ 0 0 ~n o ~ ~ ~ of N N N ~ N 7 C O > N x. c o ~' a~ ~ > j U N O ~ N ~ ~ N N O O ~ m m rn U N o o U U n. o ~ Q Q N N Q ~ L ~ N N d N Z Z ~ O Z 10-3 • • m t 0) 7 tC N N N N lC N C_ Q Of O ~a d o ~ °' f= ~ ~ N ~ C C ~ m ~ ~, f0 C d O m U C7 d Z O O ~ r-. O. +p-' Z ~ l0 ~U ~ ~ N N 0 O O N ~ Z Q > O F- ~O,d Z~ ~ y N ~ ~t ~ N ~~ J Q, Or ~rN V'OrO ~NNrr V rr V'V MM777 V to 00000 o 0 0 0 0 0 o v o 0 rOONNOM0a0O ~O.-~ ~ ~ ~ r-~-•-- ff)~ V M~rNrOD O N N M 0 r 0 t n N 0 O~MMr0f0f0f0.- fn~rcO V' OOMM ~ M M r M O U i 0 ~~ fnv~frirfnfnOmco NNMMMMet'fOOr rNMVf0O fn 00 7fDOO00 Otn ~ MrNrO<7'M rfDO tnOrrfArNNrfn ~ ~M~ OON 0000 ~' ~ NMfA fD d'V'ff~V 47 M 00 O(0 rfOOtYNM O _ 'V'N0N000 OrO C O.; MMM~ V M11700r O0 O .. ma m ~U ~ Z a~ m ~ O N 41 ~ y~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ N A fpO0MMC0 OOO a0N Q~ ~'OO~O00~OfDO O O ~O~~~O.-.-~~ m F- MM~OrNCOrOr ~ fA fD~MOtnOOOfD d V r (DrtnMOOOr- N G ~ Z OQ Ofn O0D0~rf~fDr OrCOmO(DMMr - f m fONOO vrcor r n to V 0N.-00O V'NN NNNMMN~t fD COr ~ fU m y y ONOff>r 00M0f0O d p, ~ ~ O O O fD N 0 CO N 0 O In 0 to M fC1 t0 ~ T p O .. .. ~ fpMO0MNrO~tN C m ~ V r R O O N f n M 0 r '~yJ > OONNMMNMNOM '° ~ °0~~~~ m~ ~ n d o c oc o LL MtnO~d'OOrfl~r ~ to r M 0 N OD OD to M f0 N O)d ~fNNfANOOOf0 (O p~ m ~ QQ c0OO00 Mf0 V rOO ~~00~O0NrM7 m ' V' f n N M r O O M M 0 O V V'Och~O.--~Or M M<i'~t VRO~~~ rnNCOVr~conMrn 9 OONf0OO ~~'0N m Orf0 ~'N~t OtL)rf0 O N 7 N OD to ~ 0 N d' 00 fO N ~ y ~ 0 'V'00 '7 fpOM ~ N0~f~00 fON Or ~ Q fD M00O0MlnO Q'N OCD IO NIO0 Mf0~m N tt fD ODON'7 f01~O N N N N M M M M M M Efl C O OOOOtONNNOO O O O O M M M M O O 07 rfn htCINMMMfAO 7 M d' d' ~ A 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ p rrrrrrrraoao d ~ ~ f0 tD r00OO~NM~f10 N Om0000OOOOOO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 } I1 _N 7 O N N 0 0 0 r O fn I ~ M N .- N N O m 0 OO ~- ~t M h M~t0 O N a0 moo 1f7~7 W N 0 ~A ~ N M 0 M ~ M M O M N ~ O O O r O M OD N N 0 0 0 O f n r O N N r N N to r V rt0O V'r N ~OrDO O O N (~ 0 O ~r- I~ O ~ M N N O ~~~ fN N V f0 ll7 N N N_ fro M 0 ~ V O N M fOO MODO ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ M f0 7 a ~ O O O O O O .-~ N M ao 0o ao v, c p N W ~ ~ ~O ~ ~ r- a 10-4 • • I U c E r U (~ .~.+ Q N L 7 •~ C a~ a x w c a~ E O ~- ~-- ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~_ C a~ x~~ W _ +. ~ +~• ~ 'Z f°- o 0 ~ `'' O n ~U ~ ~ a~i ~ E -v C '' i' V Q ~ C C ~ O -~ O ~ ca a~ ~ c a~ ~ 0 0 0 0 of 0 0 0 0 0 \ \ \ 0 0 0 ~- MO~fiMd•'~OMNN ctM00 ~ to d•O~d~Mf`OOOOONM MCON ~ ~ NMMIf~~~~COCflf~CO l.C)~CO N ~ 0 C a~ ~ .~ x Zw a~ ~ ~ ~ NOd•t-oOU~Nt~t.f)N 00~ ~++ N ~O~ttiC~'r~•DOMI` MNO ~.. C ~ MNNNM~~d~~-~ ~r-N ~ ~ ~ C CflCfltnNMi000C~c-O OI~O E r- f~ 00 N cO NCO cO c0 ~ 0 00 1` 00 ` C CO ~ O~ O~ M ti~ In Cfl O CO ~ ONOMNCOt.C)Nr•-O ~t'O~ ~ Op0000000~NN Md"~ ;~ o a r- ~- ~ r- ~ ~ ~- ~- o~ x w i..., MOOo00~Ct•OMMN CONN ~ ~-0000)f~. ~f•OOCO~ ~cOCO OCDd~~O~I~d~lnNO Mf~O ~ ,V tl~ 00 0O ~ O pp N Cfl 0 ~- CO N ~' -~ O Op t~ C0 'kt O~ O I~ C0 - 0~ O ~n - ~ rNIf~OQOMNf~f~r ~OOr ~ ~ N M M C• to PD I~ l` 00 a0 t~ t~ 0 H ~ I~t.f)NNN Of~00 d•00 ~- N f~ I~ N ~ f` O O M CO I~ I~ y CU ti~ d' O cfl O O o0 r- O ti ~ l 00~'~O ~ 'M ~,p ~-Oo0~0 '~t~~~d' ICON ~~ nco ai ~ C q rnCOf ~i ~r-NNNNNMC'7 . MME cO~aOCfll`o00cO~tN NMM O f~ cO N In 0 !~ 00 1~ N O CO CO NNN~N'd~~OCOM c~opt.f) ~ p, ~ ~ N ~- ~- N C~ to 00 N d' N I` • CO O ~• N Cfl l~ f~ 0 0 0 M N N V Nd~00~~tOtt~N~--CD CflMln C • ~- ~- ~ N M M ~' ~ ~ d• M d• d• ` a I CO !` 00 O O ~ N M d• ~ ~ CO f~ 0p CO 00 00 Gp O O O O d7 O X 0 0 0 ~ Od~00000000 DOOd~ •O I1 1 ~-~ J C n. x m c L O L O f6 C ~a 0 N Q it County of Roanoke Debt Policy I. Back round g A. A debt policy addresses the level of indebtedness the County of Roanoke can reasonably expect to incur without jeopardizing its existing financial position and to ensure the efficient and effective operation of the County. B. A debt policy also addresses the purposes for the types of debt that will be issued. C. The debt policy is to be used in conjunction with the Operating and Capital Improvements Budget, the Capital Improvements Program (CIP),and other financial policies. II. Standards A. National Federation of Municipal Analysts B. Government Accounting Standards Board C. Government Finance Officers Association . III. Planning and Performance A. The planning, issuance and review of outstanding and proposed debt issuances will ensure that compliance with the debt policy is maintained. B. The County may issue debt for the purpose of acquiring or constructing Capital Projects including buildings, machinery, equipment, fiuniture and fixtures. C. Debt issuances will be pooled together when feasible to minimize issuance costs. D. The County will prepare and adopt annually a five year Capital Improvements Program to identify and establish an orderly plan to meet the County's infrastructure needs with all debt-related projects and the debt service impact upon operations identified. IV. Issuance Guidelines A. The County will not use short-term borrowing to finance operating needs, except in instances as described under Revenue Anticipation Notes. B. Long-term debt will be used in compliance with all aspects of the debt policy. • C. The maturity of any debt will not exceed the expected useful life of the project for which the debt is issued. m:\finance\common\debt\policy.wpd February 22, 1996 1 ~-6 D. Each project proposed for financing through debt issuance will have an analysis performed for review of tax impact and future operating costs associated with the project and debt issuance. E. Debt as a percentage of Assessed Value will not exceed 3.0%. F. The Debt per Capita will not exceed a ratio of $1,500. G. Debt Service as a percentage of General Governmental Expenditures will not exceed 10%. H. Debt ratios will be calculated each fiscal year in conjunction with the budget process and audit. I. At a minimum, all issuances of Debt require approval and appropriation of the proceeds by the Board of Supervisors with additional approvals, if applicable, indicated in the following types of debt. V. Bond Anticipation Notes A. The County may issue Bond Anticipation Notes (BANs) in expectation of General Obligation Bonds or Revenue Bonds when cash is required in order for the financed capital project to be initiated or continue or when long-term markets do not appear appropriate on a given date, but have a clear potential for improvement within 12 months. B. The County will issue BANS for a period not to exceed two years. C. No BANS will be rolled over more than one additional two year period. VI. Revenue Anticipation Notes A. The County's Fund Balance goal of 6.25% of General Fund Revenues was designed to provide adequate cash flow to avoid the need for Revenue Anticipation Notes (BANs). B. The County may issue BANs in an extreme emergency beyond the County's control or ability to forecast when the revenue source will be received subsequent to the timing of funds needed. C. The County will issue BANs for a period not to exceed the one year period permitted under the Constitution of Virginia, Article VII Section 10. m:\tinance\common\debt\policy.wpd February 22, 1996 1 O_,7 VII. General Obligation Bonds A. The Constitution of Virginia, Article VII Section 10, and the Public Finance Act provide the authority for a County to issue General Obligation (GO) Debt with no limit on the amount of GO Debt that a County may issue. B. The County may issue GO Debt for capital projects or other properly approved projects. C. All debt secured by the general obligation of the County must be approved by the Board of Supervisors and a public referendum, with the exception of Virginia Public School Authority (VPSA) Bonds and State Literary Fund loans which do not need approval by referendum. VIII. VPSA Bonds and State Literary Fund Loans A. School capital projects may be constructed with debt, either through VPSA Bonds or State Literary Fund Loans, with preference given to accessibility and interest rates. B. Approval of the School Board is required prior to approval by the Board of Supervisors. IX. Revenue Bonds A. The County may issue Revenue bonds to fund enterprise activities, such as water and sewer utilities, or for capital projects which will generate a revenue stream. B. The bonds will include written covenants which will require that the revenue sources are sufficient to fund the debt service requirements. C. Cost of issuance, debt service reserve funds and capitalized interest may be included in the capital project costs and thus are fully eligible for reimbursement from bond proceeds. X. Capital Acquisition Notes and Leases A. The County may issue short-term notes or capital leases to purchase buildings, machinery, equipment, furniture and fixtures. XI. Moral Obligation Debt A. The County may accept a moral obligation for the payment of debt incurred by other agencies and agree to pay debt service when revenues of such agencies may prove insufficient to cover debt service. B. Payment of moral obligation debt service will be done when the best interest of the County is clearly demonstrated. C. While such moral obligation support does not affect the debt limit of the County, the amount of bonds issued with the County's moral obligation should be controlled in order to limit potential demands on the County. There is no legal obligation, but the County is m:\finance\common\debt\policy.wpd February 22, 1996 10_g placing its good name and reputation on the line and there is every expectation that the County would make good any deficiencies when a default exists. XII. Disclosure and Communications A. The County will maintain good communications with bond rating agencies to inform them about the County's financial position by providing them the County's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) and Operating and Capital Improvements Budget. B. The County will follow the National Federation of Municipal Analysts and Government Finance Officers Association policy of full continuing disclosure. C. The County will disclose the preceding ten fiscal year's debt ratios in the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. D. The County will disclose an estimate of the subsequent five fiscal year's debt ratios in the Operating and Capital Improvements Budget with an analysis of the impact, if any, moral obligation debt would have on the debt ratios. • • m:\finance\common\debt\policy.wpd February 22, 1996 1 ~-9 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~ Ci AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 27, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Work Session on the Vehicle Management System COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: Attached is a sample of the information which is available on the fleet management system recently installed for the County. For each vehicle, information is available to assist in managing the fleet in considering maintenance decisions and in establishing criteria for consideration at the time for replacement. Each vehicle receives a weighted value concerning age, maintenance cost and mileage for consideration. This information coupled with the knowledge of the use of the vehicle helps to manage the fleet by suggesting vehicles which may be too costly to maintain. Bill Rand and Joey Stump will be present at the work session to describe the characteristics of the system and to answer questions from the Board. This information is preliminary and will be used during the development of the budget in determining the final recommendations of staff. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, John M. Chamb iss, Jr. Elmer C. Ho ge Assistant Administrator County Administrator ----------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Motion by: VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Harrison Johnson Minnix Nickens VEHICLE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM REPORT ~~,i FOR WORK SESSION ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 13, 1996 Attached is the current vehicle replacement analysis. Extracted are the 42 vehicles that exceed 14 points. Additionally note that there are 26 vehicles that exceed 5 points in 2 categories and 103 that exceed 5 points in 1 category. The county has authorized 411 active vehicles and has 420 active vehicles. There are 5 vehicles that are in transition to surplus and 10 vehicles in surplus awaiting auction. Auctions are held semi-annually. Attached is the Replacement Eligibility Standard presently being used. Information has been entered for all county vehicles serviced by Garage I or II. Fire and Rescue vehicles are in the process of data entry. All files are being verified. PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS A PRELIMINARY REPORT, NOT A REQUEST. As the budget process progresses, the vehicle replacement requests will be evaluated with respect to available resources, and the finalized request will be presented by the County Administrator. `~1' `~~ VEHICLE REPLACEMENT ANALYSIS Vehicle # Tvt~e of Vehicle Department Est. Cost RC0839 76 Ford Recycle Solid Waste $120,000 RC0853 84 Ford Rearloader " 143,000 RC0854 84 Ford Rearloader " " RC0860 76 Dodge Dump truck " 45,000 RC086~4 85 White Rearloader " " RC0865 85 White Rearloader " " RC0866 85 White Rearloader " " RC0869 85 White Bandit " 163,000 RC0872 87 White Bandit " " RC0876 91 White Bandit " " RC0878 91 White Bandit " " 1,367,000 F00444 85 Chev Caprice Emergency-Fire 20,343 F00446 85 Chev Caprice " " F00457 89 Chev Caprice " " F00458 87 Jeep Cherokee " 25,286 F00482 85 Chev Impala " 20,343 106,658 U90125 90 Chev Caprice Emerg-Uniform Div. 20,343 U91108 91 Chev Caprice " 20,343 40,686 BM0985 86 GMC 1500 P/U Building Maint. 27,500 27,500 DBO110 85 Chev Celebrity Eng. & Inspect. 16,517 16,517 DP0124 85 Chev Impala Develop./Planning 18,468 18,468 PR0744 89 Chev S10 Ext Parks & Rec 17,150 PR0922 86 Chev S10 " 17,150 PR0925 78 Ford Dump truck " 45,000 PR0934 86 Ford Ranger 17,150 PR0938 85 Ford Dump truck " 45,000 PR0954 87 GMC P/U " 17,150 PR0955 86 Chev S10 " 17,150 PR0957 87 Chev P/U " 17,150 PR0961 84 Chev P/U " 17,150 PR0962 87 Chev Blazer " 21 765 PR0976 86 Plymouth Reliant , 16,517 248,332 RD0071 85 Dodge P/U Eng. & Inspect. 17,150 17,150 U00766 88 Chev Dump truck Utility Dept. 45,000 U00768 88 Chev S10 Blazer " 17,150 U00779 89 Chev 1500 " 17,150 U00784 89 Chev 1500 " 17,150 U00800 85 Dodge D350 " 22,385 U00801 85 Ford F800 " 45,000 U00821 86 Dodge Ram 50 " 17,150 U00890 89 Chev S10 Ext " 17,150 U00892 89 Chev S10 Ext " 17, 150 215,285 2,222,596 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT ANALYSIS NON-EMERGENCY --------YU 1N'1'S------ W I -G EQUIPS YEAR ---MAKE--- --MODEL--- 89 86 85 85 88 88 88 86 88 93 93 gg 94 90 86 89 91 86 89 86 95 95 91 9~ 90 95 85 85 89 91 91 91 93 91 86 85 88 94 88 88 89 90 90 91 91 95 95 79 79 81 OLDSMOBILE CHEVROLET FORD FORD FORD FORD FORD CHEVROLET FORD PLYMOUTH PLYMOUTH PLYMOUTH PLYMOUTH DODGE GMC CHEVROLET DODGE FORD DODGE AMC CHEVROLET CHEVROLET DODGE CHEVROLET CHEVROLET CHEVROLET CHEVROLET CHEVROLET CHEVROLET CHEVROLET CHE4I~OLET GMC CHEVROLET FORD FORD CHEVROLET DODGE GMC CHEVROLET CHEVROLET FORD FORD FORD FORD FORD OLDSMOBILE OLDSMOBILE FORD FORD DODGE DELTA 88 CELEBRITY TEMPO TEMPO TEMPO TEMPO TEMPO CELEBRITY TEMPO ACCLAIM ACCLAIM SUNDANCE SUNDANCE D250 VAN 1500 BLAZER RAM 250 PU F350 D350 VAN JEEP CL11006 1/2 T 4X4 RAM250 CAPRICE CAPRICE LUMINA VAN CELEBRITY CELEBRITY S10 BLAZER S10 BLAZER S10 BLAZER JIMMY BLAZ S10 BLAZER TEMPO TEMPO IMPALA DIPLOMAT JIMMY 4DR S10 BLAZER S10 BLAZER BRONCO II BRONCO BRONCO EXPLORER EXPLORER GUTLESS GUTLESS F250 4DRPU F150 RAM 350 -DEPT- MILES MAINT AGE TOTAL 211000 3.4 1.2 3.8 8.4 261000 4.4 2.7 5.0 12.1 401000 2.9 5.3 5.0 13.2 401000 3.4 4.1 5.0 12.5 401000 2.1 2.4 4.7 9.2 401000 2.9 3.4 4.7 11.0 401000 2.1 2.3 4.7 9.1 401000 3.7 2.9 5.0 I1.6 401000 2.7 3.3 3.5 9.5 401000 0.6 0.2 1.5 2.3 401000 0.8 0.2 1.3 2.3 401000 0.5 0.1 1.2 1.8 401000 0.6 0.1 1.2 1.9 523000 4.5 2.9 3.5 10.9 523000 3.9 8.7 5.0 15.0 523000 2.8 1.5 3.9 8.2 523000 1.9 1.0 2.6 5.5 523000 3.5 4.0 5.0 12.5 523000 3.7 2.8 4.0 10.5 523000 4.2 4.1 5.0 13.3 524000 0.3 0.0 0.5 0.8 524000 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 524000 1.0 1.0 2.9 4.9 281300 4.7 3.8 3.1 1I.6 281300 4.7 3.1 3.2 11.0 213200 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.6 513200 3.1 8.2 5.0 15.0 513200 1.3 7.4 5.0 13.7 513200 5.0 3.0 3.7 11.7 513200 3.3 1.8 2.8 7.9 513200 4.9 1.9 2.8 9.6 513200 3.7 1.5 2.4 7.6 513200 3.3 1.6 1.6 6.5 541000 3.4 1.9 2.8 8.I 541000 4.0 4.4 5.0 13.4 541000 5.0 6.4 5.0 15.0 552000 0.2 3.8 4.4 8.4 513200 1.2 0.3 1.0 2.5 513200 5.0 3.4 4.4 12.8 513200 4.4 3.4 4.I 11.9 513100 2.6 0.8 4.0 7.4 513100 3.7 1.8 3.4 8.9 513200 2.0 0.7 3.4 6.1 513200 2.8 1:1 2.8 6.7 513200 2.1 0.7 2.8 5.6 513100 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.4 513100 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.4 487100 1.0 6.5 5.0 12.5 487100 0.0 3.7 5.0 8.7 487100 1.6 2.9 5.0 9.5 '/ QI^G EQUIP# YEAR ---MAKE--- --MODEL--- -DEPT- MILES MAINT AGE TOTAL F00432 81 DODGE VAN 487100 0.9 1.8 5.0 7.7 F00433 82 FORD BRONCO 487100 2.9 2.7 5.0 10.6 F00435 83 CHEVROLET K 30 487100 0.6 3.8 5.0 9.4 F00436 91 GMC K3500 TRUC 487100 0.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 F00438 84 CHEVROLET K 30 487100 0.6 2.4 5.0 8.0 F00439 84 CHEVROLET K 30 487100 0.5 2.0 5.0 7.5 F00440 84 CHEVROLET PICKUP 487100 0.0 0.6 5.0 5.6 F00441 71 CHEVROLET VAN 487100 2.4 2.4 5.0 9.8 F00442 84 GMC 3500 SIERRA 487100 0.7 1.3 5.0 7.0 F00455 86 CHEVROLET XXXX 487100 0.2 0.7 5.0 5.9 F00456 86 FORD F350 PU 487100 1.6 2.6 5.0 9.2 F00460 87 CHEVROLET PICKUP 487100 0.0 0.5 5.0 5.5 F00465 69 CHEVROLET CARRY ALL 487100 1.2 1.6 5.0 7.8 F00469 89 CHEVROLET PICKUP TR. 487100 0.2 0.2 4.0 4.4 F00472 76 FORD F700 487100 0.7 8.9 4.0 13.6 F00473 79 CHEVROLET G30 487100 0.2 5.0 3.9 9.1 F00480 90 CHEVROLET SCOTTSDALE 487100 0.6 0.8 3.1 4.5 F00488 93 FORD F350 487100 0.1 0.1 1.6 1.8 F00495 81 CHEVROLET BOX VAN 487100 1.0 0.1 5.0 6.1 FS0161 92 GMC PICKUP 423300 2.1 1.9 2.2 6.2 FS0162 95 CHEVROLET K10 PICKUP 423300 1.1 0.3 0.6 2.0 FS0165 94 GMC TC-10903 423300 1.1 1.2 1.0 3.3 GS0993 88 OLDSMOBILE 88 521000 5.0 2.8 4.1 11.9 GS0994 88 BUICK LASABRE 521000 4.6 4.1 4.1 12.8 GS0995 89 CHEVROLET CAVALIER 521000 3.7 1.5 3.9 9.1 JS0996 88 FORD CROWN VIC 523100 1.0 7.1 4.3 12.4 JS0998 90 CHEVROLET CAPRICE 523100 5.0 4.3 3.2 12.5 JS0999 95 CHEVROLET VAN 523100 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 L00021 81 DODGE RAM 250 621000 0.3 5.2 5.0 10.5 L00023 88 CHEVROLET CAV WGN 621000 4.0 2.4 4.6 11.0 L00024 94 GMC VAN/SOARIN 621000 0.3 0.1 1.1 1.5 ~r1 ~~ ~.J •T~[ L 1 T !1T L+ T 1 1 '7 !'1 C ^~ 6 • ~ a • ./ 4 ~ ~ e L ~ ~ TTC7-~1T~^ B~~ TL-7 C~ C ~7 P4~ . ~. ' . ' . PR0730 87 CHEVROLET S10 583000 3.3 2.2 5.0 10.5 PR0731 87 CHEVROLET S10 583000 2.4 3.1 5.0 10.5 PR0732 87 CHEVROLET CELEBRITY 583000 5.0 2.9 5.0 12.9 PR0735 92 FORD VAN 583000 1.5 0.8 1.4 3.7 PR0736 80 DODGE D300 SPORTSMAN 583000 0.2 7.2 5.0 12.4 PR0744 89 CHEVROLET S 10 EXT 583000 5.0 5.7 3.9 14.6 PR0745 90 CHEVROLET CAPRICE 583000 4.7 4.5 3.1 12.3 PR0746 85 DODGE OMNI 583000 3.7 0.1 5.0 8.8 PR0751 86 FORD TEMPO 583000 3.3 2.8 5.0 11.1 PR0753 88 CHEVROLET PICKUP 583000 3.8 2.3 4.5 10.6 PR0754 89 CHEVROLET S 10 583000 4.2 2.2 4.0 10.4 PR0755 96 FORD BUS VAN 583000 0.0 5.0 0.1 5.1 PR0756 88 CHEVROLET S 10 583000 3.3 2.5 4.4 10.2 PR0758 88 FORD E350 VAN 583000 1.3 6.4 3.5 11.2 PR0759 90 FORD VAN E350 583000 1.7 1.0 3.1 5.8 PR0916 84 CHEVROLET PICKUP 583000 2.5 5.0 5.0 12.5 ~- Qi-~. EQUIP# YEAR ---MAKE--- --MODEL--- -DEPT- MILES MAINT AGE TOTAL PR0919 86 GMC PICKUP 583000 0.2 4.9 5.0 10.1 PR0920 86 GMC PICKUP 583000 0.9 5.4 5.0 11.3 PR0921 89 CHEVROLET CAPRICE 583000 5.0 3.7 3.7 12.4 PR0922 86 CHEVROLET S10 583000 5.0 4.8 5.0 14.8 PR0925 78 FORD DUMP TRUCK 583000 4.3 5.0 5.0 14.3 PR0926 95 CHEVROLET K20 PICKUP 583000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PR0927 90 CHEVROLET S10 583000 2.2 1.5 3.4 7.1 PR0928 83 FORD F150 583000 3.3 5.0 5.0 13.3 PR0929 80 FORD F600 DU.TR 583000 0.4 6.6 5.0 12.0 PR0933 88 CHEVROLET S10 583000 3.4 2.7 4.4 10.5 PR0934 86 FORD RANGER 583000 3.8 6.0 5.0 14.8 PR0935 87 FORD F150 583000 2.8 5.0 3.0 10.8 PR0936 86 GMC PICKUP 583000 4.1 4.2 5.0 13.3 PR0937 86 GMC PICKUP 583000 0.3 4.1 5.0 9.4 PR0938 85 FORD DUMP TRUCK 583000 3.2 7.9 5.0 15.0 PR0941 86 PLYMOUTH RELIANT 583000 0.3 6.3 5.0 11.6 PR0946 86 FORD F150 583000 0.1 4.5 5.0 9.6 PR0954 87 GMC PICKUP 583000 5.0 4.6 5.0 14.6 PR0955 86 CHEVROLET S10 583000 5.0 8.8 5.0 15.0 PR0956 ~86 CHEVROLET PICKUP 583000 0.6 5.0 5.0 10.6 PR0957 87 CHEVROLET PICKUP 583000 1.4 8.4 5.0 14.8 PR0958 80 FORD F100 PU 583000 0.9 5.0 5.0 10.9 PR0960 94 CHEVROLET DUMP TRUCK 583000 0.7 1.0 1.0 2.7 PR0961 84 CHEVROLET PICKUP 583000 0.1 9.2 5.0 14.3 PR0962 87 CHEVROLET BLAZER 583000 5.0 7.0 5.0 15.0 PR0963 88 FORD VAN 583000 3.2 4.8 4.5 12.5 PR0964 95 CHEVROLET PICKUP 583000 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.6 PR0965 95 FORD F800 DUMP 583000 0.3 0.3 0.6 1.2 PR0976 86 PLYMOUTH RELIANT 583000 5.0 5.6 5.0 15.0 PR0977 87 CHEVROLET CELEBRITY 583000 4.1 2.5 5.0 11.6 PR0979 89 DODGE VAN 583000 3.5 4.3 4.0 11.8 PS0176 88 CHEVROLET CAVAL. WGN 451000 0.7 4.8 4.6 10.1 RC0832 95 CHEVROLET 2500 PU 522000 0.2 0.4 0.5 1.1 RC0833 95 CHEVROLET 2500 PU 522000 1.3 0.5 0.5 2.3 RC0839 76 FORD PACK. RECYCLE 522000 0.8 5.0 5.0 10.8 RC0846 94 FORD F-800 TR. 522000 1.5 0.5 0.9 2.9 RC0847 94 FORD F-800 TR. 522000 1.4 0.9 0.9 3.2 RC0848 94 FORD F SERIES 522000 2.0 1.6 1.5 5.1 RC0860 76 DODGE D600 DU.TR 522000 0.2 5.0 5.0 10.2 RC0861 95 CHEVROLET 2500 3/4 T 522000 0.8 0.2 0.4 1.4 RC0862 95 CHEVROLET 2500 3/4 T 52200.0 0.8 0.2 0.4 1.4 RC0863 95 CHEVROLET 2500 3/4 T 522000 0.3 0.0 0.4 0.7 RC0879 91 MITSUBISHI FH TRUCK 522000 5.0 6.1 2.8 13.9 RD0046 94 FORD DUMP TRUCK 513300 0.7 0.7 1.1 2.5 RD0071 85 DODGE PICKUP ~ 513300 2.1 7.6 5.0 14.7 RD0072 83 CHEVROLET 3500 513300 0.0 'S.0 5.0 10.0 RD0073 86 DODGE D50 513300 3.7 3.4 5.0 12.1 RD0075 95 FORD F800 DUMP 513300 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 SS0035 95 FORD TAURUS WAG 601000 0.8 0.1 0.7 1.6 SS0036 95 FORD CROWN VIC 601000 0.4 0.3 0.3 1.0 * ,v1~+~~ ,vt't ~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~ -G EQUIP# YEAR ---MAKE--- --MODEL--- -DEPT- MILES MAINT AGE TOTAL U00760 88 CHEVROLET KODIAK 70 531200 3.9 5.0 4.5 13.4 U00762 92 FORD F800 562600 1.0 1.1 2.4 4.5 U00764 88 CHEVROLET C30 DUMPTR 562200 3.8 4.6 4.5 12.9 U00765 89 CHEVROLET 20 SERIES 562600 4.2 2.9 3.9 11.0 U00766 88 CHEVROLET 30 DUMP TR 562600 4.1 6.0 4.5 14.6 U00768 88 CHEVROLET S10 BLAZER 531100 5.0 4.6 4.4 14.0 U00769 80 FORD F800 562200 2.3 5.4 5.0 12.7 U00770 86 CHEVROLET CELEBRITY 561000 1.4 4.3 5.0 10.7 ~' U00772 91 CHEVROLET 3500 562200 2.8 4.6 2.7 10.1 j U00773 89 CHEVROLET 70 SERIES 562200 2.7 3.3 4.0 10.0 ~, U00774 86 AMC CHEROKEE 561000 4.8 2.9 5.0 12.7 U00775 92 CHEVROLET S10 EXT PU 562100 4.6 2.0 2.3 8.9 U00776 93 CHEVROLET S10 4X4 PU 562600 2.2 1.5 1.5 5.2 U00777 88 CHEVROLET STEP VAN 531200 3.0 2.8 4.3 10.1 U00778 92 CHEVROLET 3500 4WD 562200 2.3 2.1 2.2 6.6 ~~ U00779 89 CHEVROLET 1500 562600 5.0 5.6 3.9 14.5 ' U00780 89 CHEVROLET C8000 562600 2.8 3.5 4.0 10.3 U00782 92 CHEVROLET 2500 PU 562200 2.8 2.8 2.3 7.9 U00784 89 CHEVROLET 1500 531200 5.0 6.9 3.9 15.0 U00786 95 CHEVROLET S10 BLAZER 531100 0.4 0.0 0.3 0.7 U00787 93 CHEVROLET S10 EXT PU 562200 1.4 0.8 1.5 3.7 U00788 90 DODGE D250 531200 3.0 2.1 3.2 8.3 U00791 77 GMC 35 STEPVAN 562600 2.4 2.0 5.0 9.4 U00793 93 CHEVROLET BLAZER 531200 2.3 1.1 1.5 4.9 U00794 91 CHEVROLET 3500 4WD 531200 3.5 4.6 2.6 10.7 U00795 92 CHEVROLET S10 BLAZER 531100 2.4 1.3 2.2 5.9 U00796 92 CHEVROLET S10 BLAZER 562600 2.5 0.9 2.2 5.6 U00797 92 FORD F3~0 531200 2.3 2.2 2.3 6.8 U00799 95 CHEVROLET S10 BLAZER 561000 0.5 0.0 0.3 0.8 U00800 85 DODGE D350 562200 0.8 9.0 5.0 14.8 U00801 85 FORD F800 562600 3.9 7.3 5.0 15.0 U00804 91 CHEVROLET VAN 562200 5.0 5.9 2.8 13.7 U00810 94 CHEVROLET S10 PICKUP 531100 1.6 0.6 0.9 3.1 U00816 94 CHEVROLET S10 531100 1.3 0.5 0.9 2.7 U00818 86 FORD F250 EXT C 531200 1.6 5.7 5.0 12.3 U00821 86 DODGE RAM 50 562600 4.2 5.0 5.0 14.2 U00822 86 GMC VAN P30 562600 1.8 0.7 5.0 7.5 U00823 93 CHEVROLET BLAZER 531100 2.5 1.1 1.5 5.1 U00824 94 GMC JIMMY 4DR 561000 1.7 0.3 1.1 3.1 U00825 94 GMC JIMMY 4DR 561000 I.8 0.5 1.1 3.4 U00826 94 GMC JIMMY 4DR 56100.0 1.1 0.4 1.1 2.6 U00827 94 GMC JII~IY 4DR 561000 1.1 0.2 1.1 2.4 U00828 87 FORD L8000 562200 4.2 2.6 4.9 11.7 U00890 89 CHEVROLET SIO EXT 562600 5.0 5.6 3.9 .14.5 U00891 89 CHEVROLET S10 EXT 531100 5.0 4.1 3.9 13.0 U00892 89 CHEVROLET S10 EXT 531100 5.0 5.8 3.9 14.7 U00893 95 CHEVROLET G-20 VAN 562200 0.3 5.0 0.1 5.4 U00894 95 CHEVROLET S10 PICKUP 531100 0.8 0.3 0.4 1.5 U00895 90 DODGE DAKOTA 531200 5.0 5.1 3.2 13.3 U00897 91 FORD L8000 562600 4.3 3.1 2.8 10.2 ~7 ,~ ,t* EQUIP# YEAR ---MAKE--- --MODEL--- -DEPT- MILES MAINT AGE TOTAL U00898 91 CHEVROLET S10 PICKUP 531100 3.9 5.1 2.8 11.8 U00899 91 CHEVROLET SIO PICKUP 531100 3.9 3.6 2.8 10.3 U07601 94 CHEVROLET 2500 EXT 562200 1.4 0.4 0.9 2.7 U07602 94 CHEVROLET 2500 EXT 531200 1.1 0.6 0.9 2.6 U07605 96 CHEVROLET S10 PICKUP 531200 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 U07606 96 CHEVROLET S10 PICKUP 531200 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 U92105 92 CHEVROLET CAPRICE 471100 4.7 4.7 3.5 12.9 YH0042 86 DODGE MAXI VAN 661000 3.4 4.9 5.0 13.3 8 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT ANALYSIS EMERGENCY --------POINTS--------- EQUIP# YEAR ---MAKE--- --MODEL--- -DEPT- MILES MAINT AGE TOTAL A94501 94 FORD EXPLORER A94502 94 FORD EXPLORER C88101 88 FORD CROWN VIC C88106 88 FORD CROWN VIC C88107 88 FORD CROWN VIC C88112 88 FORD CROWN VIC C88113 88 FORD CROWN VIC C89100 89 AMC JEEP CHEROKEE C92501 92 CHEVROLET LUMINA C92502 92 CHEVROLET LUMINA C92503 92 FORD CROWN VIC C93500 93 CHEVROLET CAPRICE C93501 93 CHEVROLET CAPRICE C94500 94 FORD TAURUS SED C94503 94 FORD CROWN VIC C96501 96 FORD CROWN VIC C96502 96 FORD CROWN VIC C96503 96 FORD CROWN VIC D85500 85 DODGE VAN D88116 88 PONTIAC BONNEVILLE D90123 90 PONTIAC SEDAN D91103 91 CHEVROLET LUMINA D91113 91 CHEVROLET LUMINA D91114 91 CHEVROLET LUMINA D91115 91 CHEVROLET LUMINA D91116 91 CHEVROLET LUMINA D91117 91 CHEVROLET LUMINA D92100 92 CHEVROLET LUMINA D92101 92 CHEVROLET LUMINA D93110 93 FORD BRONCO D95100 95 FORD TAURUS D95102 95 FORD TAURUS F00403 86 CHEVROLET CAPRICE F00404 86 CHEVROLET 30 SERIES F00444 85 CHEVROLET CAPRICE F00445 85 CHEVROLET CAPRICE F00446 85 CHEVROLET CAPRICE F00451 96 FORD CROWN VIC F00452 96 CHEVROLET SUB. S.WGN F00457 89 CHEVROLET CAPRICE F00458 87 JEEP CHEROKEE F00463 87 FORD CROWN VIC F00466 88 CHEVROLET S10 BLAZER F00467 88 FORD CROWN VIC F00468 88 GMC HAZ MAT TR F00474 89 CHEVROLET CAPRICE F00477 90 CHEVROLET CAPRICE F00479 90 GMC SUBURBAN F00481 91 GMC SUBURBAN F00482 85 CHEVROLET IMPALA 311000 1.6 0.4 2.0 4.0 311000 1.2 0.2 1.7 - 3.1 311100 0.1 3.2 5.0 8.3 311100 0.5 4.4 5.0 9.9 311100 3.4 3.1 5.0 11.5 311100 1.2 4.6 5.0 10.8 311100 4.2 2.8 5.0 12.0 311100 2.6 1.6 5.0 9.2 311100 3.5 1.4 3.6 8.5 311100 3.7 2.5 3.6 9.8 311100 1.8 1.3 3.3 6.4 311100 2.6 2.0 2.7 7.3 311100 2.6 1.6 2.7 6.9 311100 0.5 0.1 2.1 2.7 311100 1.9 0.7 1.6 4.2 311100 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 311100 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 311100 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 471200 0.5 0.5 5.0 6.0 471200 5.0 4.6 4.1 13.7 471200 4.1 1.6 5.0 10.7 471200 2.0 1.1 4.7 7.8 471200 1.9 1.3 4.6 7.8 471200 3.0 1.5 4.6 9.1 471200 2.3 3.5 4.6 10.4 471200 3.2 1.1 4.6 8.9 471200 3.6 1.0 4.6 9.2 471200 2.3 1.3 3.6 7.2 471200 1.4 0.5 3.6 5.5 471200 1.9 0.2 1.2 3.3 471200 0.8 0.1 1.5 2.4 471200 0.4 0.1 0.9 1.4 487100 4.4 3.4 5.0 12.8 487100 0.1 4.0 5.0 9.1 487100 5.0 5.1 5.0 15.0 487100 3.8 4.0 5.0 12.8 487100 5.0 5.9 5.0 15.0 487100 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.3 487100 0.0 5.0 0.0 5.0 487100 5.0 5.0 5.0 15.0 487100 5.0 6.3 5.0 15.0 487100 0.1 4.6 5.0 9.7 487100 4.7 3.1 5.0 12.8 487100 0.0 2.2 5.0 7.2 487100 0.0 0.0 5.0 5.0 487100 5.0 3.5 5.0 13.5 487100 3.2 1.2 5.0 9.4 487100 4.9 1.8 5.0 11.7 487100 4.0 1.2 5.0 10.2 487100 5.0 7.1 5.0 15.0 :~ Q~°G Q i-c. --------POINTS--------- EQUIP# YEAR ---MAKE--- --MODEL--- -DEPT- MILES MAINT AGE TOTAL F00484 91 CHEVROLET CAPRICE F00485 91 CHEVROLET CAPRICE F00486 91 CHEVROLET SUBURBAN ~ F00487 91 CHEVROLET CAPRICE F00489 93 CHEVROLET CAPRICE F00491 94 CHEVROLET BLAZ-1500 J86100 86 CHEVROLET PICKUP J86107 86 PLYMOUTH RELIANT J86108 86 CHEVROLET CAPRICE J87501 87 DODGE ARIES J88105 88 FORD CROWN VIC J91500 91 CHEVROLET CAPRICE J92500 92 CHEVROLET ASTRO VAN J93502 93 CHEVROLET CAPRICE J93503 93 CHEVROLET LUMINA J94504 94 FORD CROWN VIC K91102 91 DODGE PICKUP 250 K92103 92 FORD F150 PU K94103 94 GMC SIERRA PU K94104 94 FORD F150 M92111 92 FORD CROWN VIC 589101 89 DODGE PICKUP S90100 90 CHEVROLET CAPRICE 594100 94 GMC JIMMY ~ S95101 95 FORD TAURUS ', T92112 92 FORD CROWN VIC T93109 93 CHEVROLET CAPRICE T94101 94 CHEVROLET CAPRICE T94112 94 CHEVROLET CAPRICE U75100 75 GMC VAN U90101 90 CHEVROLET CAPRICE U90102 90 CHEVROLET CAPRICE U90104 90 CHEVROLET CAPRICE U90107 90 CHEVROLET CAPRICE U90109 90 CHEVROLET CAPRICE U90110 90 CHEVROLET CAPRICE U90114 90 CHEVROLET CAPRICE U90119 90 CHEVROLET CAPRICE U90122 90 CHEVROLET CAPRICE U90124 90 CHEVROLET CAPRICE U90125 90 CHEVROLET CAPRICE U90126 90 CHEVROLET CAPRICE U90127 90 CHEVROLET CAPRICE U90129 90 CHEVROLET CAPRICE U91100 91 CHEVROLET CAPRICE U91101 91 CHEVROLET CAPRICE U91102 91 CHEVROLET CAPRICE U91104 91 .CHEVROLET CAPRICE .U91105 91 CHEVROLET CAPRICE U91107 91 CHEVROLET CAPRICE 487100 3.4 1.9 4.5 9.8 487100 2.6 1.7 4.5 8.8 487100 0.0 0.0 4.3 4.3 487100 5.0 5.0 0.6 10.6 487100 1.1 0.3 2.2 3.6 487100 1.2 0.2 2.1 3.5 313000 2.7 3.4 5.0 11.1 313000 0.4 5.3 5.0 10.7 313000 5.0 3.5 5.0 13.5 313000 2.7 2.6 5.0 10.3 313000 3.7 3.3 5.0 12.0 313000 4.3 2.1 4.1 10.5 313000 5.0 2.3 4.1 11.4 313000 3.5 5.7 2.6 11.8 313000 1.0 0.3 2.6 3.9 313000 2.6 0.8 1.5 4.9 471400 5.0 3.8 4.7 13.5 471400 4.4 3.1 3.6 11.1 471400 0.8 0.7 2.0 3.5 471400 1.8 3.0 1.4 6.2 471000 1.8 0.7 2.6 5.1 471300 1.0 3.7 5.0 9.7 471300 4.5 2.7 5.0 12.2 471300 1.2 0.6 2.1 3.9 471300 0.4 0.0 0.9 1.3 471600 1.9 1.3 2.6 5.8 471600 1.8 1.1 2.6 5.5 471600 1.5 0.9 2.0 4.4 471600 1.9 0.6 1.5 4.0 471100 1.1 5.0 5.0 11.1 471100 5.0 3.7 5.0 13.7 471100 4.7 3.5 5.0 13.2 471100 4.7 2.2 5.0 11.9 471100 4.8 3.3 5.0 13.1 471100 5.0 2.8 5.0 12.8 471100 3.8 2.8 5.0 11.6 471100 4.8 3.1 5.0 12.9 471100 3.5 2.3 5.0 10.8 471100 4.0 3.7 5.0 12.7 471100 4.5 2.8 5.0 12.3 471100 4.8 5.6 5.0 15.0 471100 5.0 3.2 5.0 13.2 471100 4.4 2.7 5.0 12.1 471100 5.0 3.5 5.0 13.5 471100 4.5 2.5 5.0 12.0 471100 4.2 3.0 5.0 12.2 471100 3.7 2.4 5.0 11.1 471100 3.5 1.4 4.6 9.5 471100 4.4 3.7 4.6 12.7 471100 4.6 3.8 4.6 13.0 !o ~i~ --------POINTS--------- EQUIP# YEAR ---MAKE--- --MODEL--- -DEPT- MILES MAINT AGE TOTAL U91108 91 CHEVROLET CAPRICE 471100 5.0 5.0 4.6 14.6 U91109 91 CHEVROLET CAPRICE 471100 5.0 3.7 4.6 13.3 U91111 91 CHEVROLET CAPRICE 471100 5.0 3.0 4.6 12.6 U91112 91 CHEVROLET CAPRICE 471100 5.0 3.8 4.6 13.4 U92102 92 CHEVROLET CAPRICE ~ 471100 5.0 2.9 3.5 11.4 U92103 92 CHEVROLET CAPRICE 471100 4.0 3.6 3.5 11.1 U92104 92 CHEVROLET CAPRICE 471100 3.3 3.2 3.5 10.0 U92106 92 CHEVROLET CAPRICE 471100 4.2 3.3 3.5 11.0 U92107 92 CHEVROLET CAPRICE 471100 4.7 3.1 3.5 11.3 U92108 92 CHEVROLET CAPRICE 471100 2.8 1.3 3.5 7.6 U92109 92 CHEVROLET CAPRICE 471100 4.0 2.1 3.5 9.6 U92110 92 CHEVROLET CAPRICE 471100 4.5 2.6 3.4 10.5 U93100 93 CHEVROLET S10 BLAZER 471100 3.5 3.5 3.0 10.0 U93101 93 CHEVROLET S10 BLAZER 471100 3.8 2.6 3.0 9.4 U93102 93 CHEVROLET CAPRICE 471100 3.1 3.4 2.6 9.1 U93103 93 CHEVROLET CAPRICE 471100 2.6 2.2 2.6 7.4 U93104 93 CHEVROLET CAPRICE 471100 3.3 1.6 2.6 7.5 U93105 93 CHEVROLET CAPRICE 471100 2.5 2.4 2.6 7.5 U93106 93 CHEVROLET CAPRICE 471100 2.3 1.8 2.6 6.7 U93107 93 CHEVROLET CAPRICE 471100 3.4 2.8 2.6 8.8 U93108 93 CHEVROLET CAPRICE 471100 3.3 2.9 2.6 8.8 U94102 94 CHEVROLET CAPRICE 471100 2.1 1.1 2.0 5.2 U94104 94 CHEVROLET CAPRICE 471100 1.5 0.5 2.0 4.0 U94105 94 CHEVROLET CAPRICE 471100 1.3 0.4 1.9 3.6 U94106 94 CHEVROLET CAPRICE 471100 2.5 1.3 1.9 5.7 U94107 94 CHEVROLET CAPRICE 471100 1.9 1.3 1.8 5.0 U94108 94 CHEVROLET CAPRICE 471100 2.4 1.2 1.8 5.4 U94109 94 CHEVROLET CAPRICE 471100 1.6 0.6 1.6 3.8 U94110 94 CHEVROLET CAPRICE 471100 1.5 1.1 1.6 4.2 U94111 94 CHEVROLET CAPRICE 471100 1.2 0.6 1.5 3.3 U94113 94 FORD CROWN VIC 471100 1.7 0.6 1.5 3.8 U94114 94 FORD CROWN VIC 471100 1.9 2.1 1.5 5.5 U94115 94 FORD CROWN VIC 471100 1.4 1.0 1.5 3.9 U94116 94 FORD CROWN VIC 471100 1.1 0.4 1.5 3.0 U94117 94 FORD CROWN VIC 471100 1.2 0.5 1.5 3.2 U94118 94 FORD CROWN VIC 471100 1.1 0.5 1.5 3.1 U94119 94 FORD CROWN VIC 471100 1.1 0.6 1.5 3.2 U94120 94 FORD CROWN VIC 471100 1.7 1.0 1.5 4.2 U96100 96 CHEVROLET CAPRICE 471100 0.5 0.3 0.4 1.2 U96101 96 CHEVROLET CAPRICE 471100 0.4 0.2 0.4 1.0 U96102 96 CHEVROLET CAPRICE 471100 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.9 U96103 96 CHEVROLET CAPRICE 471100 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.7 U96104 96 CHEVROLET CAPRICE 471100 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.8 U96105 96 CHEVROLET CAPRICE 471100 0.4 0.1 0.4 0.9 U96106 96 CHEVROLET CAPRICE 471100 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.9 U96107 96 CHEVROLET CAPRICE 471100 0.4 0.1 0.4 0.9 U96108 96 CHEVROLET CAPRICE 471100 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.6 U96109 96 CHEVROLET CAPRICE 471100 t! 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.6 ~ Release 4.80 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT ANALYSIS SOLID WASTE --------POINTS--------- EQUIP# YEAR ---MAKE--- --MODEL--- -DEPT- MILES MAINT AGE TOTAL RC0853 84 FORD PACK. LN 8000 522000 5.0 5.0 5.0 15.0 RC0854 84 FORD PACK. LN 8000 522000 5.0 5.0 5.0 15.0 RC0864 85 WHITE PACK WX64 522000 5.0 5.0 5.0 15.0 RC0865 85 WHITE PACK WX64 522000 5.0 5.0 5.0 15.0 RC0866 85 WHITE PACK WX64 522000 5.0 5.0 5.0 15.0 ~RC0869 85 WHITE PACK WXLLDU42 522000 4.9 5.0 5.0 14.9 RC0870 94 WHITE-VOLV WX64 522000 1.4 1.5 1.2 4.1 RC0871 94 WHITE-VOLV WX64 522000 1.2 2.0 1.2 4.4 RC0872 87 WHITE PACK WXLLDU42 522000 4.6 5.0 5.0 14.6 RC0873 94 WHITE-VOLV WX64 522000 1.3 1.6 1.2 4.1 RC0876 91 WHITE-GMC WX64 522000 3.2 8.2 3.8 15.0 RC0877 91 WHITE-GMC WX64 522000 3.6 5.0 3.7 12.3 RC0878 91 WHITE-GMC WX64 522000 3.2 8.7 3.7 15.0 a• -~ Iz ' ~ VEHICLE REPLACEMENT ANALYSIS AMBULANCE ~~-G --------POINTS--------- EQUIP# YEAR ---MAKE--- --MODEL--- -DEPT- MILES MAINT AGE TOTAL R00330 84 FORD E 350 487100 3.6 2.6 5.0 11.2 R00340 86 FORD E 350 487100 4.6 2.7 5.0 12.3 R00351 95 FORD E350 487100 b.l 5.0 0.0 5.1 '~ R00352 95 FORD E350 487100 0.1 5.0 0.0 5.1 R00360 82 FORD E 350 XL 487100 3.2 0.5 5.0 8.7 R00361 85 FORD E 350 487100 3.6 3.6 5.0 12.2 R00362 85 CHEVROLET C 30 4X4 487100 2.7 3.0 5.0 10.7 R00380 89 CHEVROLET C 3500 487100 2.3 1.1 4.7 8.1 R00381 88 FORD E 350 487100 4.1 2.4 4.7 11.2 R00387 85 FORD E 350 487100 0.1 9.5 3.1 12.7 R00388 92 FORD F 350 487100 1.7 0.6 2.2 4.5 R00392 94 CHEVROLET 3500 487100 0.9 0.3 1.1 2.3 R00394 94 FORD E 350 487100 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 !.> Q~ ~. VEHICLE INVENTORY SUMMARY AUTHORIZED VEHICLE DEPARTMENT VEHICLES INVENTORY VARIANCE County Administrator 1 1 0 Engineering/Drainage 11 11 0 Utility* 47 53 6 Assessments 11 11 0 Commissioner of the Revenue 2 2 0 Building Inspections 7 7 0 Economic Development 1 1 0 Planning 3 3 0 Communications 3 3 0 General Services 38 37 -1 Library 3 3 0 Utility Billing 3 3 0 Procurement 1 1 0 Parks and Recreation 39 43 4 Police 98 98 0 Fire and Rescue 112 112 0 Sheriff 26 26 0 Social Services 2 2 0 Youth Haven II 1 1 0 Development Services 1 1 0 Cable TV 1 1 0 411 420 9 *4 of the 6 Utility Overrun vehicles relate to temporary bond funded positions. t ,~ ~~ ~~ REPLACEMENT ELIGIBILITY STANDARDS (MINIMUM) Sedans, emergency Sedans, nonemergency Pickup trucks Dump trucks, single axle Vans Ambulances Crash trucks light and medium duty Crash trucks heavy duty Fire trucks Ladder and brush trucks Air trucks Utility vehicles, 4x4, etc Refuse trucks 100,000 miles/5 years 120,000 miles/9 years 120,000 miles/9 years 120,000 miles/9 years 120,000 miles/9 years 90,000 miles/7 years 120,000 miles/20 years 120,000 miles/22 years N.A./20 years N.A./18 years 100,000 miles/8 years 120,000 miles/9 years 130,000 miles/7 years Maintenance: A computer rating value of up to 10 points. This value is calculated by dividing the actual life-to-date non- accident dollars spent on the equipment by the average of the original cost & replacement cost of the equipment to get a percent. The percent is multiplied by 10 to get the current value. Maintenance Cost Life-to-Date Original & Replacement Cost Average = o x 10 = Rating Value The total represents the rating value total of Mileage/Hours + Maintenance + Age. When this total reaches 15, the program calculates that the piece of equipment should be replaced. The remaining life and replacement date are calculated and adjusted as the rating point total moves toward 15. IS FIRE AND RESCUE VEHICLES WORK SESSION FEBRUARY 13, 1996 The attached list of vehicles shows the fleet of the department including the model information, mileage and cost of maintenance provided outside the County Garage. This information is being compiled for inclusion in the central computer system of the County for use during the Budget preparation for this year. A committee of volunteers and career staff are reviewing all units as a part of the budget program this year to prioritize the needed replacement units and to recommend any movement of vehicles within the fleet to extend the life and usefulness of the equipment. The list includes two new pumpers and two new ambulances which have been received by the County and are in the process of being licensed, certified and readied to be placed in service (by March 1, 1996). The units being replaced are identified as "Surplus 96" and will be turned in for disposal by the County once the new units are operational and staff has been trained. J~ ~ i -~ Veh# Rad # Year Make/Model Mileage Maint. 7/93-1/96 Notes F400 1932 Seagrave Pumper Co 6 Antique F403 C11 1986 Chev Sedan 88,210 154.50 F404 A9 1986 Chev Cube Van 25,907 12,573.0 Air Truck F407 FU3 1973 Ford/Oren 26,523 1255.25 Foam Truck F409 T9 1975 Mack Tanker 29,715 2905.46 4000 gal. F410 E11 1975 Kenworth 27,335 2557.96 Surplus 96' F411 W7 1996 Pierce Pumper New F412 T7 1977 Hahn Tanker 66,024 20,831. Surplus 96' F413 T8 1977 Hahn Tanker 28,956 5996.67 F414 E10 1978 Mack Pumper 36,455 9456.76 to be res. F415 W3 1996 Pierce Pumper New F416 T4 1985 Ford Tanker 21,308 2342.28 Old T10 F418 B10 1979 Ford Brush Trk 23,366 F422 E3 1980 Am LaF Pumper 21,984 4748.39 to be E10 F423 W12 1980 Am LaF pumper 31,473 8424.76 F424 E4 1980 Am LaF pumper inop. 1574.73 F425 W2 1980 Am LaF Pumper 22,102 15,914. F426 W3 1980 Am LaF pumper 54,510 19,311. to be E3 F427 ES 1980 Am Laf Pumper 30,613 3588.98 F428 L3 1980 Am LaF Ladder 25,533 15,949. 100' F429 LS 1980 Am LaF Ladder 16,890 10,436. 100' F431 ST2 1981 Dodge Van 37,918 F432 U6 1981 Dodge Van 22,101 F433 U9 1982 Ford Bronco 4X4 70,419 vol purchase F434 T3 1982 Ford Tanker 30,614 4626.53 F435 BS 1983 Chev Brush Trk 15,561 184.69 F436 Sp2 1991 GMC Utility Trk 76,100 7163.37 ~~ ~i ~ F437 W7 i983 Ford Pumper 63,082 10,391. to be E7 F438 B8 1984 Chev Brush Trk 14,816 548.95 F439 B9 1984 Chev Brush Trk 13,182 97.67 F440 B4 1984 Chev Brush Trk 6,340 F441 U12 1971 Chev CarryAll 56,061 new on order F442 B7 1984 GMC Brush Trk 16,483 488.97 F444 CS 1985 Chev Sedan 113,258 61.17 F445 C3 1985 Chev Sedan 76,578 F446 C6 1985 Chev Sedan 112,655 F450 W20 1985 Pierce Pumper 25,261 5032.04 F451 P 1 1996 Ford Sedan 1,100 205.90 F-1S2 U7 1996 Chev Suburban 35 vol purchase FOSS B6 1986 Chev Brush Trk 4,108 F456 U3 1986 Ford P/U 4X4 38,991 191.06 F457 CS 1989 Chev Sedan 110,005 169.07 F458 Trnl 1987 Jeep 4X4 98,422 1489.68 F4S9 T6 1986 Intl. Tanker 8,734 2948.85 F460 B2 1986 Chev Brush Trk 5,105 F461 W8 1987 Grumm. Pumper 18,525 3921.78 F462 E9 1986 Grumm. Pumper 26,807 5039.79 F463 C9 1987 Ford Sedan 104,261 519.00 F465 U8 1969 Chev CarryAll 28,701 F466 C7 1988 Chev S10 Blazer 95,076 66.50 F467 C10 1988 Ford Sedan 95,119 519.00 F468 HM1 1988 GMC Truck 4,334 1755.46 F469 B 11 1989 Chev Brush Trk 5,807 486.11 F470 W9 1989 Pierce Pumper 31,251 4450.82 F471 E6 1989 Pierce Pumper 11,073 2394.87 F472 MC 1 1976 Ford Comm Bus 117,601 1912.84 r8 F473 HM6 1979 Chev Cube Van 105,131 26.56 F474 1989 Chev Sedan 107,213 333.50 F476 W11 1989 Seagrave Pumper 14,046 4609.06 F477 P4 1990 Chev Sedan 62,731 F479 Cml 1990 GMC Suburban 98,422 75.00 F480 B12 1990 Chev Brush Trk 16,982 815.92 F481 Cm2 1991 GMC Suburban 78,422 278.00 F482 C4 1985 Chev Sedan 115,082 F483 WS 1990 Grumm Pumper 40,437 15,578. F484 P3 1991 Chev Sedan 67,500 49.50 F485 P2 1991 Chev Sedan 51,061 F486 U10 1991 Chev Suburban 8,105 ~ 250.00 vol purchase F487 C12 1991 Chev Sedan 108,144 F488 Sq9 1993 Ford Squad 3,778 529.18 vol purchase F489 Chl 1993 Chev Sedan 23,121 76.53 F490 W10 1993 Spartan Pumper 10,440 3527.03 F491 Cm3 1994 Chev Blazer 23,715 F492 L2 1993 LTI Ladder 15,904 4512.29 1/2 Vinton F495 FIl 1981 Chev Fire Invest 22,859 1827.70 old ambulance R329 R23 1971 Chev CarryAll 33,123 vol maim R330 R92 1984 Ford Type 2 4X 61,913 R335 R22 1988 Ford Type 1 40,438 vol maim R339 Sg10 1976 Ford Squad 23,902 3778.47 vol maim R340 R102 1986 Ford Type 3 81,915 R341 Sq2 1992 White Squad 7,084 vol maim R350 R26 1990 Ford Type 1 28,511 vol maim R351 R51 1995 Ford Type 3 new R352 R91 1995 Ford Type 3 new R358 R82 1983 Ford Type 2 4X4 27,942 vol maim Q , ~. ~, R359 Sq8 1980 Chev Squad 10,739 vol maim R360 R91 1982 Ford Type 3 971.00 surplus 96 R361 R31 1985 Ford Type 2 4X4 65,124 new on order R362 R24 1985 Chev Type 1 4X4 49,215 new on order R363 C50 1986 Chev Suburban 57,160 vol maim R364 R103 1985 Ford Type 3 4X4 27,571 vol maim R365 C70 1986 GMC Jimmy 75,324 vol maim R367 C60 1987 Ford Bronco 20,720 vol maim R368 C20 1987 Jeep 68,534 vol maim R369 R25 1985 Ford Type 1 41,179 vol maim R370 C90 1987 GMC Jimmy 64,722 vol maim R373 R62 1988 Ford Type 2 4X4 15,383 R374 R52 1988 Ford Type 2 115,570 vol maim R377 Sq3 1976 Dodge Squad 16,146 vnl new nrr~Pr R378 R83 1981 Ford Type 1 75,904 R380 R81 1989 Chev Type 1 4X4 41,531 710.57 R381 R75 1988 Ford Type 3 75,752 753.18 R382 R77 1989 Chev Type 1 4X4 29,583 R383 Sq5 1989 White Squad R384 R94 1990 Ford Type 1 R385 R35 1990 Ford Type 3 R386 Sq6 1991 Ford Squad 2,391 403.66 R387 R51 1985 Ford Type 2 103,784 312.17 R388 R101 1992 Ford Type 1 4X4 29,752 R389 R36 1993 Chev Type 1 4X4 18,956 R390 Sq7 1993 Ford squad 6,232 R392 R56 1994 Chev Type 1 4X4 15,595 R394 R63 1994 Ford Type 3 4X4 5,637 R396 R55 1994 Ford Type 2 16,059 z~ F>J-G ~- TO: Members, Board of Supervisors FROM: ~ Brent Robertson, Budget Manager DATE: February 27, 1996 SUBJECT: BPOL Legislation Update On Tuesday, February 13, 1996, the House and Senate passed the Brickley BPOL legislation and forwarded it to the Governor for his signature. If signed, the effective date will be January 1, 1997 and will impact Roanoke County's revenue projections for FY1996-97. MEMORANDUM . There are a number of components to this legislation; however, fiscal impact will be reviewed in the body of this memo. Threshold provisions have been included that will affect individual localities differently depending on total population and actual receipts of particular businesses located within that locality. The thresholds identified are as follows: Population 0 to 25,000 25,001 to 50,000 50,001 or greater Business Receipts Threshold NA $50,000 or less $100,000 or less Maximum Fee Allowed NA $50 $100 As shown above, the proposed legislation will not affect localities with populations of 25,000 or less. Roanoke County falls into the last category, due to a population of approximately 81,500. This means that businesses in our locality with gross receipts equal to or less than $100,000 are exempt from paying BPOL taxes. Also, we have the option of imposing up to a $].00 license fee, not only on the businesses that are exempt under the threshold, but also on all other businesses as well. However, the $100 fee must be rolled back to $50 by January 1, 2000. 4-4 Fiscal Impact -Roanoke County (based on 1995 filings and assessments) FY1994-95 BPOL revenues totaled $3,159,000. The County has approximately 4,800 business license accounts. 4,029 of these accounts report gross receipts of $100,000 or less. Total Projected Revenue Loss from proposed legislation Otin Not Imposing License Fee $100 fee only on exempt businesses $100 fee on all businesses Additional Revenue $0 $402,900 $480,000 $(458,000) Net County Gain Loss $(458,000) $(55,100) $22,000 The optional license fees referred to above are "not to exceed" amounts; therefore, any amount below this $100 ceiling could be imposed, at the Board's discretion. 4-5 ~~~~- r~ County of Roanoke, Virginia • Capital Ifnp~ovement P~og~am Fiscal Yeas 1997 - 2001 1997 - 2001 Capital Improvement Program Board of Supervisors Bob L. Johnson Chairman of the Board Dr. Harry C. Nickens Vice Chairman of the Board Lee B. Eddy Board Member H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix Board Member Fenton "Spike" Harrison Board Member Elmer C. Hodge, Jr. County Administrator • Table of Contents • Table of Contents Ca~3ta1 Improvement Program ................. . .. ..................................1 Clerk of Circuit Court ..........................................................6 Expansion of File Storage Area ................................................ 7 Communications .............................................................11 800 MHz Radio System Upgrade ............................................. 12 Court Service Unit ............................................................15 Branch Office in South County or Vinton ....................................... 16 Economic Development ........................................................17 Valley TechPark Phase II ................................................... 18 Blue Ridge Parkway Visitor Orientation/Interpretation Center ....................... 19 I-81 Industrial Site .........................................................20 Hollins Joint Industrial Park ................................................. 21 Elections/Voter Registration .................................................... 22 Voting Machines ..........................................................23 • Engineering .................................................................24 Regional Stormwater Management/Drainage .................................. . 25 County-wide Road Improvement ........................................... . 26 Geographic Information System Phase I ........................................ 27 Geographic Information System Phase II ................................... . 29 Automated Permitting System ............................................ . 31 ... Renovation of Roanoke County Administration Center ............................ 32 Fire and Rescue ..................................................... .33 Bunk Room Additions ......................................................34 Mount Pleasant Public Safety Building ..................................... . 35 Hanging Rock Public Safety Center ........................................... 36 Network Fire and Rescue Facilities ......................................... . 37 Underground Storage Tank Removal .................................... . 39 Upgraded Paging Capabilities ............................................. . 40 Bay Heat and General Renovations ..................................... . 41 Training Center ........................................................ .42 Hollins Road Public Safety Building ....................................... . 43 Clearbrook Public Safety Building Renovations .......................... . 44 800 Mhz Base Stations ......................................................45 Fire Hydrant Installation .................................................... 46 GeneralSenriees .............................................................47 • Wi~xlovr Replacement at the Public Safety Center ................................ 48 Frr~eloader Service Upgrade and Expansion ............................... . 49 Residential Automated Curbside Recycling ..................................... $0 Microwave System Test Unit ................................................. $1 Library .................................. ...................................$2 Access Parity & Automated System Support ............................ . $3 Headquarters Library .......................................................$$ Vinton Parking Lot Expansion & Building Renovation .................... . $7 Glenvar Branch Expansion and Renovation ................................ . $9 Mason's Cove Branch Library ....................................... . 60 Bent Mountain Branch Expansion ............................................. 61 Parks and Recreation .................................................. .62 Camp Roanoke Development ................................................ 63 Garst Mill Park . ................................................ 6$ Land Acquisition/District Park .......................................... . 66 Green Hill Park Phase III ....................................... ..... 67 Community Recreation Center ..................................... . 68 Burton Athletic Complex .................................................... 69 Vinyard Park Phase III ............................................ .... 70 • Walrond Park Phase III .......::............................................ 71 Improvements for Parking Areas ............................. , 72 Family Aquatic Center ...................................................... 73 Brambleton Center .........................................................74 Spring Hollow Park ........................................................ 7$ Whispering Pines Phase III .................................... , 76 Merriman Soccer Complex .................................................. 77 Acquisition of Park Land .................................... ..... 78 Craig Avenue Recreation Center .................................. , 79 Picnic Shelters ................................................... .80 Starkey Park Phase III ....................................................... 81 Planning and Zoning ........................................... .82 Neighborhood Incentive Fund -Hollins ....................... , 83 County-wide Greenways ....................................................84 Public Road Improvement Fund ......................................... • .... 86 Signal Light Installation Fund .. . ........................... . 87 Off-site Drainage Fund .....................................................88 Police .................. .................................89 Emergency Communications Equipment Upgrade .................... . 90 Mobile Data System ........................................................ 91 Firearms Range ....................... 92 Evidence Vault ............................................................94 Criminal Records Systeral Improvement Program ................................. 95 Office Space ..............................................................96 Procurement .................................................................98 Print Shop ...............................................................99 Roanoke County Courts .......................................................100 Courthouse Entrance Renovation ............................................101 Sheriff ....................................................................102 Renovation of Roanoke County and Salem Jail .................................103 • • • Capital Improvement Program ~7 • R L L Q.I C O cL ++ G ~ L ~ ~ ea+ ~ U G ~ .a 0 G R O a w 0 _~ O U ~r Z , ~ a. ~ w~ m a a a a ~ a a a a G4 ~ L ~ v ~ ~ ~ ~ U O 0 0 0 ` x J a O o ~ ~ o 0 0 o ry i i I °o O o O °O ~ " I I ~ ~ p ~ w O ~ O O C O O O O O O O O O C C O O ~r y ~ i '- t~ O ~ ~ O 0 O O O 1~ C v: p O N L ~ I 0 9 C ~ d a o0 ~ ~ ~ O O 0 O O o O n M I O V1 M O O o O O O O C C O O O O p ° re a W „O+n O N ~ O t~ ~ n ~ 0 O o ~ c x o N o O o M i ~ N O V1 pp w ~ - B a w ~ ri c C o° O o° O °o O 00 O ° M ~ M o O 0 O o O c C c p ~ ~ O O O ~n O v1 o0 [~ W l~ O ~ O O O N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i - N ~ 0 ~ O ~ ~ O 7 O a MO O O O O C O O ^ 0 V1 in v1 O N v'1 N 00 W vi O O C ~ ~I ~ N ~ N - - N 1 V1 r ~ !~ O T '~ Vl N O n ry N L C ~ N 'O O O O O O O . LL GL O '_' O~+ ,... N M O O O O O O O O O ~ O O O O O O 0 0 O C O O O v •Q C O ~ O ~ O ~ O C ~ O ~' `D ~ O O h O O O O O a h O O 0 O 0 O O C O O O O ~L V 7 N c} N ~ O ~n N v1 N vi 1~ N ~ O n N I O N Vl ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O N O O M . Y a c ¢ Gl ai .-. ...~ .-. N M ~ .--~ .~ N M 7 v1 ~p y U c 0 Q A e~ y C R ~ U C _ O C C O c cC .. - ~ > cd P N td L C! r, y u ~ o ~ rl ~ ~ a. G c ~ u ` ~ ¢ F bD ~ C ~ N y ~ F ~ Q ~ "a O ~ ,~ C O >. T p ,~ O ~ U ~ ~ y ~d 'y > c. r3 ~~+ iG a E ~ C O ~ C C >, V] U y N w ~ o 'o O c .C ~ T ~ ~ .~. ~ a~ N ^3 ~ cG .~ O ~~ C € O ~° w O ~ ~ u u ~ p, L ~o f3. m .~ C ~ t V € O °~ 'O ~ _ ~ ~ d w O 3 .~ C d ,~"' U O T O CG N ~ ~ on ~ C ~ T C ~ o0 ` cD ~ ~ > W oo O A m > m ~ ~ O > ~ U V L O Q O ~ o ~ ~ ° ~ F" z W v o, c O~ ~ ~ - ~ E" u ~ y O~ = ~ o ~ ~' ~ .` °' E C ~ v F O 'S r ~ Z ~ ? ~ a V' y ~ a > o v 0 a i o ~ c A o = v ~ U '' `'1 c y O ~ ~ w N N N N ~ ~ W v r V U ~ " Q ~ Q ~ W O H !y o~ W C G C C [ C ~'-' `s' V r`~. C h ~. ~ ~ " `c. v~ O h ~ O o 0 0 `~ o °~ W ~ ~ C v C °~ .. Y w~ h ~ O O O O O V a i ~ a i U U ' O U O U W u W U W U W u W W a~ W W ~ W W W W W W C6 L 0 L C O L •+ L' ~ L .. ~ a ~ U ~ ~ ~ C R O ~, w O w 0 U ~ C , ~ ~ v c L ° ~ ° x : ~ w' cC rL cG c4 rx ~ _ cG cC r1 ocC cC ~ 7 c7 U V C7 C7 V U c7 C7 c7 C'J v c o 0 00 ~ °o c iy ° ~ o O } ~ h Gr . O ~ O O ~ O O O O .~. O O p ~ h ~ ~ 00 M 00 N O ~ N ~ ~ O ~° N y ~ M V 1 O ~y 9 y ~ O O O O O O O a K o0 o~ o O 0 ~ Vl O W9 d ~ O 0 ~ N M VNj R k. W ~ O O O O O O O O O o 00+ O O ^ ~ O O O O O ~ ~ OM ~ N Q\ n W ^ M ^ M t/~ ~ ~ O O O O O O t~ -- O O O O O O j O O 1~ ~- O O ~ .^ O O~ O M ~ M ~ ~ 00 ^ O N O O O v1 v-i r vi ~ ~ N ~ N Obi _ o0 O~ •-• M N n Lrr L C O O O O O O O O 9 ~ O p a ~ FL O O O O O O vl O O O O O O O O O O O O O ~n O O O q ~O ~ V O O °~ 'n O O '~ W O O O iD ~ t~ O O O N O O O ~O O O M N O O v1 r1 O O O ~ ~n t~ O vi b O G ~ ~ ~ op p ~ ~ ~p V b ~ O M ~ O v1 ~ a .-~ r '-. V ~ 1 V1 ry ~ N .Y A ai N M 7 ~ ~ n 00 O~ ~ ^ N .--. N M ~ c ° G cn c 'D ? y a °~ U ~ O G ~ Cq ~ c ~ , ~ ~ N = U U u 3 ~ ~ v_ c m :~ y -0 ~ ~ q W ~ °' ~~ ~ ° ~, w ~ ° ~ F" ~ > ~ ^J' ? ~~ ~ C4 ~ ~ b w 4 U '~ ~ ~ ~ v ~ ° N ~, ° ~ °~ `~ a~ ~ O 'c ~ ~ ttl rn ~ v R FL ~ ~ T C ~ R U o- - r0 ~ K td N .V J] . y .~. ~ F a' ~ ? O 7 a ~ y v~ _ ~ ~ c Y U H ` ~ °-0 C ~ ~ L 7 O O U ~° O O 6Y, tq k....7 ~C ~ = ~ CL y `d N U pp O a '~ 7 ~ H ' ~ ~p ~ ~ ~ v > . .. o ~ ° ~' 3 ~ °° ' m ~ °' c ~ c ~ • =i x o c a=i ~ 3 ~ a i m ¢~ ~ c a n ~ o ~ p ~ a ~ ai ~ ~ s ° ;; a"i u y a ~, ~ 3 3 d E ~ w ~ e c W U v_ o ,v_ o ~ R d U V~ v W v v v v v v v v v v y v 3 v H v v v v v v O ~, ~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V a a ~ a s ~ x ~ x ~ a • ~ x ~ a v vi ~ x ~ rx ~ e~ ~ ~ z ~ rx v Oi ~ ce C ~o • ~ e a ~, .~ ~, .z ~, ~ ~, o C a C G G C C = _ ~ ? 'D 'O ~ h ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ R ~ ~ a ~ ~ z C C C `w u. o, u: k. w w w w w w i~. ~ C7 C7 C7 C7 • C4 L 00 O L a c O L ~+ d ~ CQ L :4 ~a ~ U ~ d C O a w 0 7 O U ~, C V L 7 0 ~ _ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r U ,L7 Cq u (~ (~ W 0] 0] C7 0~ _ 0] (~ ~ U ~ O vi ~ O O O O N N p O a, a, O v1 O O v~ N 'V V oo O V1 o0 V1 ~' O ~ M ~ O O ~ O O O O O V1 ~ V1 ~ M O O V ~ ~ ~ O O O ~ ~ ~ ~ n O O ,/'' fV N 7 O O n M O Vl . . `O .-. ~p ~ 7 Q~ L '~ ~ M ~ LL ~ ~ O O ~ ~ y ' ' O M O O O O M a oo .., ^ ^ o ~ 0 0 o v~ ~ .. o m x a -~; ~ o, vi ~n o v o v o ' o 00 W es. rl ~ N ~ N o N 7 ~ ~O C of y ~. M M n ~ W k' 00 x O o O ao O O O O O O - y O` ~ = N N ~ O C O O O O O O w n O O O O O O C C O O O O O ~/1 r` cS N O ~ N N vi n O O O N O v'i m N a ^ O Q~ N ~ O n •.• V l ~ of ~ V l ^ ^ ^ 7 M N N .-. ~--~ ~, M ii r ~ x o 00 0 0 0 o c c _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 b "'' O M O O O O 0 . O O O ~ ~ O ~ O T M n N ~ M v1 . ^ ~ r O O O M N ^ ~ ^' O ~ } is. o - o ~ e o _ o 0 o ~ ' ~ '~ n ~ ,n ~ 0.L k~. ? N w: O O O O n M O O O M O O ~n O O O ^ O O O O O O O 0 u `L n O N c0 O M O O O O M O O ~D O O O . . "' O V O O O O O o M ~ ~' ~ e? ~ M O O O M O O a ~ O O ~ O b h O h O ~ M y O ~ '~ M ~ n ^ v1 ~n V ~n n O n -- - O O - O N ~ O oo O -- N ~ L U x O ~? n Q\ ... ~ h M ~ N M o0 ^ ~ b n ~ Vl O~ N ~ ~O v1 M n vl oo . O ~D N O n ~D o0 0. M ~ b 1 ~ .--~ p ,... ,.-, O .-• n ri ..~ ~ .: Y a c ~ ^ ~i _ N M tt Vl ~ ._. N M ~ Vl ~ n 00 Q~ ~ ~ .N. .M. ~ ~ p .n-i ~ 0 c m s y m U ` v> ~ c , c ,.,, c < ... `- ~n C y _~ y R C V G d ~ O •~ a U 1 o v' x ° Z' ° ° " cam. c L ','~ ~ ~ A d N 4 ~ .. y °' Z' a g e '' E x ~ a x v _ a a ~ > a E a ~ > c t o a F .r < ` E ~ ` qq o „ ; o ~ L a u ~ ~ ~ a ~ m Q 2 a U ~ ~ e ~ ~ ~ ` Z ' v ~ Y X Y ~ ~ Q d E v ~ c v ~ FL t T. _s . A y > ~ O ,,, i y O N . Y ~ ~ Q •J O LL p O .y, Y . ~' ~ D O C = a ~ a C d ~ 3 3 ~ . 7 L f C bO V] C x ~ = E C J < L Z > C7 ~ y cC cO U ftl C7 ~ a C7 O z 7 Ga C' > ~ 3 + j cG r: ~ = n .C 3 N ~ ~ ¢ c4 a v r U ~ r ~ o O `c a d ~ d w m 0 o 0 ~ ,J U . 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 . 0 . o . c . . 0 . . 0 0 0 . 0 . ~ w y W io is m is m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c v a x~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ " ~~ z a a ' oG oG ~ ~ a a cG ~ z a a a a 04 a s 4 Q c c c c •° v ~ ~ v •o •o •o •v v •o :1 r ~• " Z ' ~' Z' ~' ^ V] ~ a m ~d m ~d ca c ie ca ea o A ~ ~ O ~ ~ A y t . c c a p ~ d~ " d ~ d ~ a Y .` Y X 1 Y ~ 1 Y 1 1 Y ,!C Y Y Y X Y .~ a ..t < otO a a a`° a aiO a a i c `° ° a a a 1O a . o. . . . , , o . a . . . a , • CQ L 0 L a L' 0 L ++ C ~' E °C' ~ E R a' ~ a U ~ ~ ~ 'a ~' 0 a ca 0 w O _~ C 0 O U • C7 G ~ ~ O ^ ~ O k, ,n ?i x xx ~ O ~ a a a U ~ o p v ~ O a . C7 C7 0 0 ~ p . p O " p N ~ M '/ l M' N O 7 W ~ O O O O O CI O O O O C, ~ O O O O C ~ ~ ... M I ~ I a ~' ~ Y~ k, o a- 'n ~ a O~ o O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0' C'. 0 oo 0 O 0 O o oo c~ N ~ N O G ~ O O O O O'.. M N ,~ - O O 7 Ga O~ ~ O M O V1 O h O V1 C~. O~~ M M t~ V1 r- ~D oo V1 Q` N U N ~` -~ V ~+ M M (~ ~ R w ~ ~ o ° 0 ° ° ' ~ ~ { a a r o O o O 0 O o O c ' C ~ ~ N O O O O O~ r N r N ^ M v~l 0 N w i 01 O O O O O O~ O O O O ~ ~ O 0 O ~ O v1 O ~ O O O O O OI O O O O o0 op 0 ~ ~ p~ O~ O I~ '-. O M O O '-. O O .-. O O '-. C', ~ I. O 7 '. O vl O 1~ O ~ N V O '. ~ O v~ N ~. vi N 0~" ~ 0~ Q. O T r ^ ~n w _ C C O O O O V F O Oi ~ ~ vOi °" ? O G u O 0 O O 0 O O 0 O O 0 O O 0 O O 0 O O 00 M O 0 N O 0 O O 0 O O 0 ~ o 0 O O 0o -+ o0 v, N 0o ~n N O o O p 0 O v-~ 0 O v~ o O a ~ ?~ N O O O O O O M 1~ O O h O a0 .-. .-~ i i N O 0.U O N vl = Vl N v1 N v1 N O t~ M M vl M V .--~ vi ~D [~ O ~O ,~ ~O N ,~ N v i v i 'J~ N NI M ^ M ~ r yi Q a ^ N M ~ v1 N M 7 ~/1 ~O ~.. .~ ... ° ~ per, E m ~' ~ ~ - m 0. ~ ^ E ~ ~ v, E Y 0 x 0. _ ~ ~ ~ C ~ u a °~ w ° ~ o ~ Zs 0. !i G FS o c ~ ° ~ o O ~ ~ ti ~ c v ~ o E c U ~ ~ ~ v ~ .°_ ._' ~ ~ c ~ ' y ~ ,y `m u o ~ E E d > y~ ~ ~ 'O c A C~ c C7 E c c O , ~ O o t N v ' 'n o r en c Q U ~ V] ya ~ .C R H ro > O ~ C4 ~ ~ c W y o ~° `o 3 ~ ;.j .. c Q H ~ a a o c c t C U A ~ ~0 ~ ~ y = N V1 LO ~ . ' ~ U a . in O W ~ 'w w U O a` U rL 00 c 0 °~' y ' C7 Z N :y ~ y V] ' O r r z z ~ z l a, ~ a ~ ti E O N z ~ °i A s ~ a O C° v z ~ ~ r _ x d aci aci a°i aci aci Y F i U~ c ~ q Q y i e ~ r ~ r ~ 4 W ~ 0~ c ° Z c Q ~ v aci aai a0.i a~i a0.i ° ~ °c' ~ ~ U ~ Y t "" c c c c c ~ it Q (~ Q Q Q D [° ~ v c w d A ~ ~ m CC ;~ U U U U V ~ O O ~ a0.. fL 6. a c O a ~ n0. 0.01 0.O. 0. 0.01 0.O. 0.R. ~ ~ ~ ~ x c O .~ L Q U ('¢~ 4 c O Q O C ~ N `' E d V °~ L ~ 00-0 Z ~ 0 .> N d «c. u- 0. «-. O .'7. .a 0.1 C7 C x C N ` N ~" N O y 'O N y A C C dam°C7 U W ~ > 0~ Er ti d ~O a V G C O C _ 0. c .u :". ° 0. ~ '~ L U W ~ 5 • • Clerk of Circuit Court • i• i• DEPARTMENT: Roanoke County Circuit Court Clerk PROJECT TITLE: Expansion of File Storage Area ~~ Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs $150,000 $150,000 Operating Cost $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 DESCRIPTIOti Various alternatives for expansion of circuit court permanent record storage facilities with the most expensive possible solution listed above and other solutions offered under the heading "Justification" below. .IUSTIFICATION Please refer to attached pages headed "CIP Justification." FUNDING SOURCES General Operating Revenues. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT No additional personnel are requested. The additional cost of utilities and and maintenance for an expanded 1500 square feet of permanent file storage area is estimated to be $1,000.00 annually. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project is in compliance with Roanoke County's Comprehensive Plan to provide adequate storage facilities for county and court documents. 7 Roanoke County Circuit Court Clerk's Office • Request far Expansion of Storaee Facilities CIP Justification (Continued) The Roanoke County Circuit Court Clerk's office is assigned the task of maintaining all pertinent circuit court records as mandated by the Code of Virginia and by orders of the Court. It is also the keeper of certain Roanoke County historical and legal documents. Many of these records are required by state code to be kept in the original "hard copy" form even though they may have also been microfilmed for ease of access and to prevent undue wear upon them. The demand for additional storage space for these documents has risen mazkedly in the past few years because of rapidly increasing caseloads in all areas of responsibility in the clerk's office. Construction of the "new" Roanoke County Courthouse, originally designed in 1982, was completed more than ten years ago in the spring of 1985. At that time, it was probably the belief of the designers and builders of the new courthouse facility that it would meet Roanoke County's needs for a considerable number of years into the future. Inmost respects, this has proven true; I am not aware of a lack of courtroom space nor of an absence of any other courthouse facilities which may have impaired the proper administration of the circuit court's operations. However, the clerk's office is literally "bursting at the seams" as we continue to seek new and innovative methods to store files and microfilm records which must also be reasonably accessible to the public. With continued sharp increases in all functions of our office and the subsequent requirement for more file storage space, there is no end in sight and no easy solution available. Currently we have circuit court and Roanoke County files stored in our record room, in our office work areas, in a courthouse basement storage area (which does not meet Virginia State Library standards for a controlled storage environment), in the county's Kessler Mill Road General Services warehouse facility, at the Library of Virginia, and at DATASAFE, Inc., a private storage company. Because of my continued concerns with the possibility that the permanent records stored at the Kessler Mill Road site could be destroyed by floodwaters, excessive humidity or other potential problems, I have decided to move them to the DATASAFE facility. The cost of the lower priority level of storage of records at this private facility is $.25/box/month with each box consisting of approximately one cubic foot of storage space. Those records requiring a higher level of humidity and temperature control are stored in a vault at this facility at a cost of $6.00 per cubic foot. With the transfer of the additional boxes of records from Kessler Mi;II mad nisi DATASAFE at a cost of $13.00 per month, our monthly expense of storage there is now approaching X500.00, or $6,000.00 per year, for a total of 458 boxes of records stored in this facility. We have 74 boxes of files located in our basement storage area because these files are the more recent ones which are most likely to be requested by attorneys, the court, or the general public for review or for use in other related cases. Storing these files in the basement of the courthouse helps to reduce the cost of retrieval from DATASAFE, which charges the clerk in the range of $2.00 to $14.00 (depending upon how quickly • the file is needed by the requesting party) for each file which is retrieved and returned to their facility. This is an expense which the clerk's office must bear because the records are required to be reasonably available to the public upon request. These costs will continue to rise. If I had to project the amount of this increase 8 based upon current costs of storage, I would say that it would be safe to estimate an increase (over the current cost of $6,000 annually) of $500 annually. However, if the cost of privatized storage of permanent records is also increased by the vendor on a er unit or volume basis, then this figure could become inflated eery rapidly. DAT.~SAFE is one of the few local companies which offers the required storage environment so, unfortunately, there is little flexibility to negotiate with them on their prices. If the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors and the county administration agree that the best approach to solving the Roanoke County Circuit Court Clerk's office permanent record storage problem is to continue to pay this increasing cost of privatized storage then, obviously, I will abide by that decision. However, other potential alternatives exist. From several perspectives, the expansion of our current facilities would be the most practical approach to this problem, but whether it would be the most cost-effective solution would depend upon certain factors. For instance, I believe that I have correctly assumed that the clerk's office will experience anever-increasing need for additional file storage space. With this assumption in mind, an additiona1500 square feet of on-site storage area would practically eliminate the current need for most of our privatized off-site storage. This would also allow my co-workers and I to have immediate access to requested files for the public without having to wait several days for them and without having to pay for the retrieval and return of these records. If the current cost of construction is, at a maximum, $100.00 per square foot, then the additional storage area could cost as much as $50,000. However, I would also project that we would have outgrown that amount of additional storage area within three to five years. Therefore it may be more cost-effective to consider building an expanded storage area of approximately 1500 square feet, hopefully at a total cost of considerably less than $150,000.00 based upon a decreasing cost factor per square foot if a larger-sized facility is considered in order to accommodate the clerk's office's storage requirements for the next ten to fifteen years. Due to the angular design of the courthouse there is a triangle- shaped area (with approximate dimensions of 35' X 25' X 25' which could produce more than 300 square feet of potentially useable storage space) which is surrounded by our record room and offices and already has a "skylight" installed at roof level above the breezeway. It may be considerably less expensive on aper-square-foot-cost basis to expand into this part of the courthouse complex at the second floor level by "flooring and roofing-in" this area which already has side walls in place. A doorway from our current record room and/or office areas into this expanded storage space would make file storage and access quite easy and could solve a significant amount of the clerk's office's immediate storage space problem. All files currently stored in the basement of the courthouse could be moved into this area and the most frequently demanded ones which are now kept at DATASAFE could possibly be returned to the clerk's office as well. Assuming a cost of between $50.00 and $75.00 per square foot for a project of this nature, this new storage area may be able to be built for a cost of between ~ 15,000 and $25,000.00. In my opinion, this is one of the better short-term alternatives which may well be worth considering. A long-term solution would be to consult with other businesses and/or localities which may have similar controlled-environment storage needs and determine if a joint off-site facility could be bought, built or leased. The major potential problem with this approach would be that the lack of immediate access to the records and the subsequent need for off-site record retrieval and return for most (if not all) of the entities . involved could still pose an expensive and time-consuming dilemma for them. An off-site storage facility would still result in a delay in responding to the public's request for original documents and therefore would 9 not enhance customer service to Roanoke County citizens nor to others wishing to gain access to public reeds. S If there is land area available at the Roanoke County Courthouse- Jail-Sheriff s Department site in downtown Salem, then the best lon -tg erm solution may be to build an additional storage area of at least 1500 square feet attached to the courthouse. I have estimated the cost for this construction at $150,000. Building additional storage area based upon the long-term permanent record storage needs of the circuit court clerk's office should be considered in concert with any other projects, such as expansion of the adjoining Salem-Roanoke County Jail, now being considered by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. Please direct any questions, concerns or requests for further clarification or more information to me. Thank you for your kind consideration of this request. C7 • 10 • ~ Communications • ~~ PROJECT CATEGORY: • PROJECT TITLE: Communications 800 MHz Radio System Upgrade Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs $2,000 $2,413,000 $2,415,000 Operating Cost n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a DESCRIPTION This project involves the upgrade and expansion of the current 800 MHz radio system. The steps involved include: adding three channels, replacing the oldest repeaters, moving 48 low band users to the 800 MHz system, upgrading to digital microwave, adding four more channels and moving the remaining low band users to the 800 MHz system. JUSTIFICATION The current 800 MHz system has exceeded its current capacity; frequency scarcity for system expansion; low band system problems; aging of some 800 MHz equipment; and an analog microwave system nearing saturation point. It is important to note that Roanoke City is also interested in moving in this direction. There is a possibility of joint funding of this system between the County and the City. FUNDING SOURCES Project will be funded throught the continuation of existing debt. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT N/A at this time. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 'his project type is consistent with the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. 12 Communications • • Roanoke County is facing a number of communications issues that have an impact on the County's ability to carry on its day to day operations, particularly in the area of public safety. The present 800 MHz two-way communications system, which provides fine radio coverage and dependability, needs to be expanded in a timely manner in order to ensure continued dependable communications for all departments. Current issues are as follows: The 800 MHz system has exceeded its maximum capacity FCC loading limits have been exceeded on the current seven-channel system -- the system was designed for 700 users, but currently has 725 and continues to grow • Access to the system may be adversely impacted due to this congestion • The County's ability to handle a major disaster may be compromised due to the system's being unable to efficiently process the "air time" demand • Loss of a channel due to mechanical failure, lightning strike, etc., exacerbates the problem • The County is denied the advantages of using a single 800 MHz system due to lacking the "throughput" required for acceptable operation in both the public and private safety sectors Frequency scarcity for system expansion • Frequencies are allocated by the FCC on a "first-come, first-serve" basis • 806 MHz {currently used) is the most cost-effective option • Other groups in the County's area are interested in 806 MHZ frequencies; consequently, these frequencies may not be available at a later date Low Band System Problems • Low band equipment is approaching obsolescence • Need by low band users for portable radio coverage provided by 800 MHz systems • Need by low band users for unit to unit coverage, not just unit to base coverage • Need for increased operability between all departments within the County • Eliminating low band radios simplifies maintenance, parts inventory and training Aging of some 800 MHz equipment • 6 of the 21 repeaters have been in continuous use for almost 8 years; failures are occurring which cause the system to lose a channel and reduce "throughput" • 209 portables have been in service for almost 8 years; as these items age, failure rates and repair expenses will increase Analog microwave system nearing saturation point • 68 of 96 channels are currently in use Adding three 800 MHz channels will require an additiona127 microwave channels Eventual replacement with digital microwave would resolve the problem CAPITAL COSTS Several options have been proposed to deal with the above-mentioned problems. Among the options, an agent for Motorolla has presented his following Recommended Action Plan: 13 • Apply immediately to the FCC for seven additional channels; add three channels to the 800 MHz system and replace the oldest 2•epeaters; move 48 low band users to the 800 MHz system by relocating existing mobiles and portables from Public Safety and replace ~~~ith new units • Upgrade to digital microwave • Add four channels to the 800 MHz system • Move the remaining 108 low band users to the 800 MHz system COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S RECOMMENDATION: We have begun this project by applying to the FCC for additional channels. It is important that we proceed in the near futtare to begin migrating to a digital system. • 14 • Court Service Unit 15 ~. e PROJECT TITLE: Branch Office in South County or Vinton Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs $157,000 $190,000 $347,000 Operating Cost n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a DEP ~RTl1~IEN'T: Court Service Unit DESCRIPTION Construction and furnishing of a branch office on county owned land in South County or the Vinton area. Total square footage of five offices, aconference/family counseling area and a secretarial waiting room. JUSTIFICATION Facilities in the County Courthouse are currently at maximum occupance. The Court Service Unit has established justification for two additional Probation Officers and one clerical person based on the current caseload. FUNDING SOURCES Funding from general operating revenues. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Estimated costs not available at this time. Normal maintenance and operation costs of new facility would be incurred. RELATIONSHIP TO ~C;OMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project is not addressed in the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. 16 s ~ Economic Development s 17 PROJECT CATEGORY: Ecanc~rnic I~ev~etopment PROJECT TITLE: Valley TechPark Phase II Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Funding Estimated 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs $500,450 $500,450 ~ Operating Costs ~ $34,500 I 518,700 I $7,500 I $7,500 I $7,500 DESCRIPTION Continued site development of Valley TechPark. Phase II would involve site grading, landscaping, entrance sign, signalization, additional land acquisition and utility extensions. JUSTIFICATION ' Roanoke County owns the industrial park and is expected to provide site improvements equivalent to those being offered at other public industrial parks in the Roanoke Valley. FUNDING SOURCES Funding sources would be general operating revenue. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Funds for site maintenance would be needed annually. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHEYSIVE PLAN The site is included in the current Comprehensive Plan. ~~ 18 DEPARTMENT: PROJECT TITLE: • Economic Develcpmc~it Blue Ridge Parkway Visitor Orientation/Interpretation Center Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs $25,000 $100,000 $125,000 Operating Cost DESCRIPTION Development of a regional public partnership for the phased development of a Visitor Orientation/Interpretation Center, aimed at serving the traveler on the Blue Ridge Parkway at a location on the Roanoke River Parkway. This phase includes $125,000 for planning of the center, including conceptual drawings and architectural and engineering plans. Future phases will include actual construction of facility. JUSTIFICATION • Economic Development/Tourism opportunity for a partnership of local/state/federal governments to create a Visitor Orientation/Interpretation Center that will assist visitors traveling the Blue Ridge Parkway through the Roanoke Valley region. The Orientation/Interpretation Visitor Center will interpret the Blue Ridge Mountains of western Virginia and the region and assist travelers in finding food, lodging, attractions, and directions. There is an opportunity for using interactive technology and kioske to provide services and information to the Blue Ridge Parkway traveler. FUNDING SOURCES • Recommended funding sources would be general operating revenue, state grants, and federal assistance. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT No impact anticipated in the planning phase. Operating budget increase anticipated after future construction. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Comprehensive plan needs to be amended to recognize project need on the Blue Ridge Parkway and to allow for phase one of this project. 19 PROJECT CATEGORY: Economic Development PROJECT TITLE: I-81 Industrial Site Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Funding Estimated 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs $50,000 ~ $200,000 Operating Costs DESCRIPTION $250,000 This project identifies a potential industrial site in the I-81 corridor and county participation in geologic and environmental testing, site planning, appraisals, public utility extensions and/or obtaining an option to purchase. JUSTIFICATION I-81 has been identified as a state growth corridor. The Roanoke Valley's association with Virginia Tech, the "smart highway" project and the extension of a water transmission line made the I-81 corridor a desirable site for future growth. FUNDING SOURCES Recommended funding sources would be general operating revenue, state grants, federal assistance and the private sector. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT N/A at this time. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1985 Comprehensive Plan will have to be amended and industrial sites re-zoned. 20 PROJECT CATEGORY: • PROJECT TITLE: Economic I~ei>elopment Hollins Joint Industrial Park Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding Total Costs 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 $750,000 $750,000 Operating Costs $20,000 $20,000 DESCRIPTION Develop vacant 165 acre industrial site in Roanoke and Botetourt Counties. Provide an industrial access road, water, sewer, drainage, private utilities, etc., for industrial site development. Construct a 75,000 sq. ft. expandable shell building. Utilities Project, North County, I-81, Exit 43 (146) Water System. See Utility. JUST{FICATION The project will provide an economic development opportunity for at least two local governments to address the needs of lack of developable industrial sites. Both Counties can jointly use general funds as leverage for available state (CDBG, RED, Industrial Access) and federal (ARC, FMHA, EDA) funding. FUNDING SOURCES Recommended funding source for this project would be general operating revenue, State grants and Federal assistance. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Increase in operating expense for apart-time Project Manager. RELATIONSHIP TO C01-IPREHENSIVE PLAN The Hollins industrial site is identified on the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan (as amended) and is zoned appropriately in both Roanoke and Botetourt Counties. 21 • ~ Elections/Voter Registration • 22 DEPARTMENT: Elections PROJECT TITLE: Voting Machines Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Funding Estimated 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs $78,350 $78,350 $78,350 $235,050 Operating Cost I n/a I n/a I n/a I n/a I n/a DESCRIPTION New voting equipment to replace current voting machines. This equipment will be stored at the Service Center on Kessler Mill Road. JUSTIFICATION The equipment now in use is more than 35 years old. Storage is a problem. The machines are stored at the Service Center and get very dirty. The new machines would reduce the total number of machines from 87 to 36 and decrease required storage area. Also, current machines weigh 600 pounds and the new machines weigh less than 60 pounds each. FUNDIYG SOURCES Funding from general operating revenues. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Estimated costs not available at this time. . RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project is consistent with the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. 23 ~ E ' ngineering • 24 O'~.~'~:~RTMENT: PROJECT TITLE: Engineering and Inspections Regional Stormwater Management/Drainage Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs $1,000,000 $1,905,000 $1,810,000 $1,050,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $7,765,000 Operating Cost $250,000 $250.000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $1,250,000 DESCRIPTION Stormwater management will consist of the construction of regional Stormwater management facilities as identified in the Master Plan and will also address flood mitigation projects. This funding will also be needed to address federally mandated stormwater quality regulations that are currently being proposed. ~J JUSTIFICATION Roanoke County has committed to participating in a regional Stormwater management plan for the purpose of addressing existing and future Stormwater management problems. FUNDING SOURCES Code of Virginia allows for the collection of a utility tax, General Operating Budget of the County, and other sources. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT None. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. • 25 DEPARTMENT: PROJECT TITLE: .7 Engir1eering and Inspections County-wide Road Improvement (VDOT Revenue Sharing) Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding Total Costs 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 $1,915,935 $500,000 $SOU,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $4,415,935 Operating Cost DESCRIPTION This project includes all secondary roads within the County and improvements which include plant mix, drainage, curve widening, road widening, etc. .IGSTIFICATION This supplements secondary road funds with the economy as slow as it is. VDOT matches the funds up to a maximum of $500,000. The County receives $1,000,.000 in road improvements for a County investment of $500,000. FUNDING SOURCES The proposed source of funding for this project would be the savings in general operating revenue. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT None. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project type, due to its nature and/or scale is not addressed in the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. s 26 DEPARTMEI~IT: Engineering and Inspections PROJECT TITLE: Geographic Information System Phase I Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs $225,000 $200,000 $200,000 $70,000 $70.000 $765,000 Operating Cost $23,750 $23,750 $23,750 $23.750 $23,750 $118,750 DESCRIPTION This existing system provides ongoing conversion of Roanoke County's Geographic Information into a digital format and allows the most efficient access to this information. Prior funding provided in fiscal year 1994-1995 provided for networking of the current stand alone Geographic Information System (GIS). Management Information Systems has used Prior Approved Funding to purchase Sybase SQL server software that will supply attributes for our GIS. The Engineering office is currently networking the GIS software and automating the maintenance and display of information in the GIS. During the 1994-95 fiscal year the Engineering & Inspections Office acquired a 50/50 grant from the United States Corps of Engineers to provide digital orthophotos, topographic and plarumetric features. The estimated cost (including grants from the United States government) of this digital information is approximately $1,300,000. $650,000 of the referenced estimated expenditures will relate to Roanoke County's share of this grant. This project and its costs will be phased over a five year span. The Board of Supervisors approved $170,000 per year for three years (total $510,000) in fiscal year 1995-96 towards meeting this goal. Additional computer resources must be purchased to handle this substantial digital information. Phase II of this project will include integration of the GIS with Roanoke County's E-911 Dispatch center, SchooUTrash/E-911 vehicle routing and the integration of Roanoke County's water, sanitary sewer and storm water management systems into the Geographic Information System. ;7 27 .IUSTIFICATION ~ieographic Information is important. It has been estimated that 85% of government decisions require it. Creating and maintaining this information is a significant expense. A Geographic Information System can save the Citizens of Roanoke County money, reduce redundant activities, and improve the quality and accessibility of the information collected. The distribution of the information in our Geographic Information System is currently producing revenue for Roanoke County. This trend should continue as additional information is collected. FUNDING SOURCES Funding sources include general operating revenue in addition to $170,000 matching allocation from the Corps of Engineers for the first 3 years of the project. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Historically, Roanoke County's Geographic Information System impacts the Engineering and Inspections operating budget. Operating costs relate to software maintenance ($11,500), hardware upgrades ($10,000) and supplies ($2,250). • RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Conforms to policies in the Comprehensive Plan. • 28 • DEP.~.RT1d~IEI~T: PROJECT TITLE: Engineering and Inspections Geographic Information System Phase II Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs $100,000 $65,000 587,000 $50,000 $302,000 Operating Cost $7,500 $10,000 $10,000 $17,500 $17,500 $62,500 DESCRIPTION Phase II of the Geographic Information System provides additional software and hardware functionality to other departments at Roanoke County using the GIS. This phase of the Geographic Information System includes integration of the GIS with Roanoke County's E-911 Dispatch center, School/Trash/E-911 vehicle routing and the integration of Roanoke County's water, sanitary sewer and storm water management systems into the Geographic Information System: E-911/GIS Integration • The scope of this section will include the integration of the information in the current GIS with the E-911 Dispatch center. This request will provide automated software that will capture incoming calls in the E-911 Dispatch Center. It will provide emergency service personnel with current information from our GIS to quickly locate and provide pertinent information about emergency sites. School/Trash/E-911 Vehicle Routing The scope of this section includes design and installation of vehicle routing software for School Bus, Trash Truck and E-911 routing. It will automatically route these vehicles in the most cost effective and expeditious manner. 29 Water/Sewer/Storm Water Management System Tire scope of this section includes integration of the water, sewer and storm water management infrastructure with our GIS. As shown with Phase I of our GIS Project, a considerable amount of digital information will be collected by the Corp of Engineers for Roanoke County. Roanoke County will be able to gain efficiencies in data collection and display by integrating these systems into our GIS. Microfilm Management System The scope of this section includes replacement of our current microfilm management system with digital images linked to the information in our GIS. Currently, the Engineering and Inspections Department microfilms As-Built information on all new site plans. The information collected is very helpful; however, the method to retrieve the information is cumbersome and inefficient. Elimination of microfilming documents in the Engineering and Inspections Department will save the County of Roanoke $2,000 a year in microfilming costs. .IUSTIFICATION Geographic Information is important. It has been estimated that 85% of government decisions require it. Creating and maintaining this information is a significant expense. A Geographic Information System can save the Citizens of Roanoke County money, reduce redundant activities, and improve the quality and accessibility of the information collected. Integration of this system with other departments will serve to increase its functionality and benefits to the County and its citizens. The distribution of the information in our Geographic Information System is currently producing revenue for Roanoke County. This trend should continue as additional information is collected. FUNDING SOURCES Funding sources include general operating revenues as well as intragovernmental user fees($14,500 in E-911 fees have been designated annually). OPERATING 1<3UDGET IMPACT The main operating budget impact will reflect software licensing costs for departments using the GIS.. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Conforms to policies in the Comprehensive Plan. 30 DEPARTMENT: ~ineering and Inspections PROJECT TITLE: Automated Permitting S~-stem Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs $25,000 $25,000 Operating Cost DESCRIPTION This is to request funds to convert the existing building permitting system to a network based program. The conversion will include updating to a windows based environment to make data entry. JUSTIFICATION The current automated permitting system is a mainframe based program. A network based program will allow more users with the potential of allowing permit applications to be processed electronically ~o and from our department by others, such as the Town of Vinton and contractors. FUNDING SOURCES 100% General Operating Revenue OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT None RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Improvements made to the manner in which data is entered enhances accuracy which ultimately affects numerous county records and departments. Data generated by permits issued is used in the GIS system, the County Assessor's office. the Treasurer's office, the Utility Department. Utility Billing, etc. A network based system will be more readily available for use by such departments. • 31 • Operating Cost DEPAR'PI~IEN'I': Engineering and Inspections PROJECT TITLE: Renovation of Roanoke County Administration Center Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs $100,00 $ 100,000 DESCRIPTION This project will renovate the second floor of the Roanoke County Administration Center when the Department of Human Resources is moved to the third floor. Other current second floor occupants will readjust space to improve the flow of citizen traffic on the second floor and offer a better work environment for office based staff. JUSTIFICATION • The Department of Human Resources is scheduled for relocation to the third floor when space is vacated by Schwarz & Company. Office space on the second floor will be rearranged to allow better citizen traffic flow to the departments remaining and to give office based staff, such as permit clerks, more spacious work areas with some natural lighting. FUNDING SOURCES General Operating Revenue OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT None. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Rearrangement of space will enhance the current emphasis on "one-stop shop" permitting by cieere~ing citizen confusion when on the second floor. Persons disembarking from the elevator will be greeted with county personnel instead of current walls and directional signage, creating a more customer service orient environment. • 32 • ~ Fire and Rescue 33 • DE1~~ART1'YiE.'ti'T: Fire and Rescue Department PROJECT TITLE: Bunk Room Additions Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs $280,000 $300,000 $580,000 Operating Cost $2,400 $5,400 $5,400 $5,400 S5,400 24,000.00 DESCRIPTION The addition and upgrade of sleeping facilities at the identified urban stations of Hollins and Fort Lewis and the rural stations of Catawba, Bent Mountain and Masons Co~•e. These facilities would then conform to existing fire codes as well as provide a separate coed sleeping environment. JUSTIFICATION In order for the volunteers to provide rapid response to emergency calls at night, an adequate sleeping facility is required. Those existing should be upgraded to allow for both male and female members to staff the stations. The stations of Cave Spring, Hollins, Cleazbrook and Fort Lewis have been identified as core stations, meaning they have the largest percentage of calls. This request addresses Hollins and Fort Lewis, Cleazbrook is addressed in another request this yeaz and the sleeping facilities at Cave Spring are adequate. After the first year of addressing the core stations some of the rural stations are addressed. In order for the county to provide rapid emergenc}• response throughout the night we need the facilities for fire and rescue members. FUNDING SOURCES General operating revenue OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT The individual station utility costs would rise with additional space added, these annual projections are shown. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This specific project of sleeping areas was not addressed in the 1985 plan. • 34 • DEPARTMENT: Fire and Rescue Department PROJECT TITLE: Mount Pleasant Public Safety Building Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-O1 Total Costs $150,000 $700,000 $850,000 Operating Cost $8,700 $8,700 $8,700 $8,700 34,800.00 DESCRIPTION A building to replace the current building housing both fire and rescue apparatus. The current building needs replacement due to size constraints and also operation inefficiencies. JUSTIFICATION The current Mount Pleasant station is not large enough to house equipment to support the growing community. This includes a present lack of office space, sleeping and shower facilities. Several stations are addressed in this planning document for additions and/or renovations, this station should be a candidate for replacement due to numerous present inadequacies. There are no sleeping facilities and very limited office, meeting and storage spaces. The current site would be difficult to expand upon due to the space available. FUNDING SOURCES General operating revenue OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT The overall annual operating costs are shown if county water was available by construction time. This cost is projected to rise very little compared to the existing building. The current structure is very inefficient to heat. The total utility operating costs are shown. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project conforms to the goals of the 1985 plan • 35 • DEPARTMENT: FirF~ and Rest: ue Department PROJECT TITLE: Hanging Rock Public Safety Center Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs $200,000 $1,400,000 $1,600,000 Operating Cost $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 40,000.00 DESCRIPTION Provide a new Fire and Rescue Public Safety building in the area of I81 and Route 419. This would be a three-bay station initially to house a pumper and an ambulance and also include adequate living area to include; offices, sleeping areas, storage and meeting rooms. JUSTIFICATION This area is growing and the response times lengthening due to traffic. This facility would be able to serve the I81/419 area to include Cove Rd., back portions of North Lakes and Hanging Rock. This station could also provide second due back up coverage to Fort Lewis, Masons Cove and Hollins stations in order to reduce the time for on scene arrival. This could include areas in both Roanoke City and the City of Salem if an operating agreement could be reached. FUNDING SOURCES General operating revenue OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT The operating budget would still have to be addressed, staffing considerations will have to be addressed in order to finalize this. The approximate utility costs are shown. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This was identi#ied as a growth area, requiring additional services to the public. • 36 • DEPARTMENT: Fire and Rescue Departmer~t PROJECT TITLE: Network Fire and Rescue Facilities Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-O1 Total Costs $74,175 $74,175 Operating Cost $10,608 $10,608 $10,608 $10,608 $10,608 $53,040 DESCRIPTION A system to network each of the fire and rescue stations by means of personal computers to allow for electronic communications between the administrative headquarters and the individual stations and assist in more accurate record keeping. JUSTIFICATION This proposal includes purchasing a fire incident based reporting system to be integrated with the current computer aided dispatch system thus allowing essential information to be linked to fire • incident reports. This system would allow stations to enter each call into a computer database for processing instead of daily hand writing each required State of Virginia report form and submitting them on a monthly basis to fire administration. It is imperative that this information be readily available to assist the Fire Marshal's office in arson investigations and also as required by insurance companies for dollar loss claims. The computer aided dispatch vendor is currently developing an EMS incident based reporting system that would replace the State of Virginia reports presently manually maintained and would allow the same benefits as the fire incident based reporting system. The Fire and Rescue Department presently has no single means of relaying information to the volunteer and career staff. Networking the fire and rescue stations to a central computer server in the fire administration building would allow for the automation of many necessary administrative functions and permit prompt distribution of information and policies to all stations. A central system of record maintenance will greatly improve the department's efficiency and thus allow volunteer departments to monitor the status of their membership list on the official roster kept by fire administration. A centralized computer system will also allow for a means to provide better security of records. • 37 1~L:9fDING SOURCES General operating revenue OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT The annual cost for dedicated phone line access is the $10,608 as listed RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This type of project was not addressed. • 38 i• DEPARTMENT: Fire and Rescue I7'epartment PROJECT TITLE: Underground Storage Tank Removal Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs $80,000 $120,000 $200,000 Operating Cost DESCRIPTION Remove existing underground storage tanks. This has been partially funded in the 95/96 budget JUSTIFICATION This is required under current EPA guidelines FUNDil~G SOURCES General operating revenue OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT EPA fines if not completed RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This type of project was not addressed • 39 • DEPARTMENT: Fire and Rescue Department PROJECT TITLE: Upgraded Paging Capabilities Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs $100,000 $500,000 $600,000 Operating Cost DESCRIPTION Upgrade the current low band paging system to a more reliable system to notify fire and rescue members of emergencies. .TUSTIFICATION The current system does not always have coverage in some of the remote areas of the County. This request would upgrade the current low band system to a UHF system that could be simulcast from two mountain tops instead of one and include individual pagers to replace those which are approximately 10 years old. This new pager would be able to reproduce an emergency call received in order to reduce dispatcher traffic. Our present system cannot be upgraded to this level. FUNDING SOURCES • General operating revenue OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This type of project was not addressed 40 • DEPARTMEt~1T: Fire and Rescue Department PROJECT TITLE: Bay Heat and General Renovations Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs $100,000 $100,000 $200,000 Operating Cost $-500 $-500 $-500 $-500 $-500 $-2500 DESCRIPTION This project would allow for station bay heaters to be upgraded to a more energy efficient system at Catawba, Hollins, Bent Mountain and Fort Lewis as well as repair several areas parking lots that are deteriorating, building rust problems and install external 911 phones in the event the station is not staffed. JUSTIFICATION The current bay heaters in the above mentioned stations were installed in 1980 and 1981. These units are not cost effective, the newer stations as well as some of the older ones have already had their heat retrofitted. Station parking areas are crumbling in several areas where these were constructed on fill areas and no funds have been available to repair over the past years. FUNDING SOURCES General operating revenue • OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT The installation of the heaters should reduce heating costs as shown RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Projects of this nature were not addressed 41 • DEP:~RTMENT: Fire and Rescue Department PROJECT TITLE: Training Center Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs $50,000 $500,000 $500,000 $300,000 $1,350,000 Operating Cost $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $10,000 DESCRIPTION To construct a classroom facility and a ladder tower, also to repair the existing structure building. JL STIFICATION This project would allow completion of the fire and rescue training center in order to deliver more of the mandated fire and rescue subjects. The current training center is on Kessler Mill Rd. This was started in 1985 with the entire project still not being complete. Classes are now delivered at various locations depending on classroom availability as well as training resources. This would allow these to be done at one central location where the various required resources would be maintained. This project was initially funded with State grants which have not been available since 1991. FUNDING SOURCES General operating revenue OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Increased budget due to additional construction RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This type of project was not addressed • 42 .7 ULPARTMENT: Fire and Rescue Depaent PROJECT TITLE: Hollins Road Public Safety Building Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs $200.000 $1,500,000 $1,700,000 Operating Cost $11,000 $11,000.00 DESCRIPTION The construction of a new Fire and Rescue Public safety building in the area of Hollins Rd. near Plantation Rd. This facility would house apparatus to provide adequate fire and rescue coverage in this area. JUSTIFICATION This area is growing rapidly with commercial construction. This area is currently serviced from the Hollins station with response times higher than the goal of six minutes. This is an area where regional cooperation could be utilized as Roanoke City at times experiences lengthened response times to this area. FUNDING SOURCES General operating revenue OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT The exact operating budget is still to be addressed as far as staffing is concerned, the utility costs are shown. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN • This area was identified in the 1985 plan as a growth area requiring additional services. 43 • DEPARTMENT: Fire acid Rescue llepartment PROJECT TITLE: Clearbrook Public Safety Building Renovations Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs $175,000 $175,000 Operating Cost $1,200 $1,200 $1,200 $1,200 $1.200 6,000.00 DESCRIPTION This project would provide for the addition to and renovation of the current structure. This includes adding a meeting room and adequate sleeping facilities as well as providing office space and an upgraded kitchen. JUSTIFICATION The current facility has no meeting room or offices and the current sleeping area does not conform to fire code requirements as this area is upstairs with only a single staircase access. The male and female members also have to share a bathroom and shower facility when sleeping in to provide station staffing. This request accompanies others in the CIP in order to provide adequate living facilities for both male and female members. The current facility is also deteriorating from rust all around the eaves. FUNDING SOURCES General operating revenue OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT • The overall utilities may be increased slightly due to additional space, the current area would be provided with more efficient means so this is projected as a slight increase only. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHE'.~SIVE PLAN 44 • DEPARTMENT: Fire and Rescue Departrnent PROJECT TITLE: 800 Mhz Base Stations Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs $65,000 $65,000 Operating Cost DESCRIPTION This project would provide the installation of 800 mhz base stations in each of the fire and rescue stations. JUSTIFICATION Currently, the fire and rescue units do not have direct communications back to the station if additional resources are needed. A low band base station is being maintained that provides communication with the dispatch center only and not the fire/rescue vehicles. Most of these units are out of production and in great need of replacement. FUNDING SOURCES General operating revenue • OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Difficulty in maintaining existing units RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This type of project was not addressed 45 ~i~ ~~~ DEPARTMENT: Fire and Rescue Department PROJECT TITLE: Fire Hydrant Installation ~, Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated ~, Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-O1 Total Costs $30,000 $30,000 $60,000 Operating Cost DESCRIPTION Funding for individual hydrants on various water lines where none currently exist. JUSTIFICATION Required to obtain needed fire flows, this would be for approximately 50 hydrants in areas that are being connected to the new transmission lines. FUNDING SOURCES General operating revenue OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT none RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This type of project is consistent with the plan 46 • ~ General Services • 47 C] PROJECT CATEGORY: PROJECT TITLE: General Services Window Replacement at the Public Safety Center Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs 47,000 47,000 94,000 Operating Cost ~ I ~ I I I DESCRIPTION This project will be for the window replacement at the Public Safety Center. JUSTIFICATION The existing windows have deteriorated with age and require constant on going maintenance .The windows also leak, thus being a source of drafts and water damage .Replacement will not only reduce energy consumption in perimeter offices, but will also reduce maintenance cost and water damage. FUNDING SOURCES r~ • OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Reduce maintenance cost and utility savings on the monthly gas and electric bills. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project type, due to its nature and/or scale, is not addressed in the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. 48 PROJECT CATEGORY: PROJECT TITLE: General Services Freeloader Service Upgrade and Expansion Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs $129,150 $129,150 $129,150 $129,150 $516,600 Operating Cost ~ $80,000 ~ $80,000 ~ $80,000 I $80,000 ~ $80,000 I $400,000 DESCRIPTION The County currently provides a trailer left overnight to aid residents in cleaning up their houses and property. Two trailers are booked weeks and months in advance. Additional equipment would allow staff to service more residents. • • JUSTIFICATIUN The service is used year round and is usually booked weeks or months in advance. This service is cost effective in that refuse crews do not have to handle the refuse and it eliminates the temptations for residents to dump trash along the sides of the roads. FUNDING SOURCES A proposed source of funding for this project would be general operating revenue. OPERATInG BUDGET IMPACT This project would require $50,000 personnel services for additional staff and $30,000 operating expenses for the maintenance of an expanded fleet. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project type, due to its nature and/or scale, is not addressed in the 1985 comprehensive Plan. 49 I', PROJECT CATEGORY: PROJECT TITLE: General Services Residential Automated Curbside Recycling Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs $396,900 $396,900 $396,900 $396,900 $1,587,600 DESCRIPTION The County will offer commingled curbside (monthly pickup) to all residents that have automated refuse collection. Others will receive mobile drop-off service. Each home will receive a 60-gallon cart to put all their recyclable materials in. Utilizing the automated vehicles, we will collect the materials once a month. • JUSTIFICATION The County is under a state mandate to divert a certain percentage of the materials from the landfill. Curbside recycling is one component of achieving this. Automated collection is less costly and requires less manpower than source separated collection. FUNDING SOURCES A proposed source of funding for this project would be the general operating revenue. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT This project should save the County a substantial amount in tipping fees once it is fully implemented. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project type, due to its nature and/or scale, is not addressed in the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. 50 PROJECT CATEGORY: • PROJECT TITLE: General Services Microwave System Test Unit Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs $218,300 $218,300 DESCRIPTION Purchase of equipment to give the Communications Shop the ability to provide in-house maintenance for a11800 MHZ equipment. JUSTIFICATION In-house maintenance is considerably cheaper to perform, however, it does take lead time to acquire equipment, training and assume responsibility. Much of the equipment required has already been purchased due to the maintenance program assumed for the mobile and portable radios. FUNDING SOURCES A proposed source of funding for this project would be general operating revenues. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Operating savings will be realized due to the elimination of an outside maintenance contract. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project type, due to its nature and/or scale, is not addressed in the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. 51 • Library • 52 • DEPAItTI<'IENT: PROJECT TITLE: Library Access Parity & Automated System Support Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs $41,358 $47,408 $88,766 Operating Cost $1,500 $3,500 $3,500 $3,500 $3,500 $15,500 DESCRIPTION This project will place 15 public access and 4 staff workstations in six library facilities. It will upgrade telecommunications and provide support for systemwide access to the Library Reference Network and to external services such as the Internet. In addition it will substantially advance migration to a full clientlserver environment, providing the Library with a more flexible automation infrastructure. It also establishes improved support for PIN-based self-service for the public. Appropriate furnishings, barcode scanning devices, and printers will be required for some access units. JUSTIFICATION The project will improve access to the automated catalog and relieve increased queuing problems at peak periods. The project will also expand access systemwide to automated reference products at Holllins and Headquarters; and, it will allow all sites to gain access to the Internet and other external online information services. Increased access will improve productivity of reference and circulation staff. Systemwide access to the centralized reference products will allow the Library to provide a level of reference services to smaller outlets which has been budgetarily impossible to achieve in the past. County access equipment carries a workload which is 170% greater than the city's and which is 47% higher than Salem's. Placement of 19 units will bring the County's access level to rough parity with Salem, but still be substantially less than that provided by Roanoke City. The improved ratio of workload per unit should decrease the frequency of repairs and maintenance. Amore flexible automation infrastructure will allow the County greater adaptability to meet changing technological and service needs. FUNDING SOURCES Possible funding source is the general operating revenue. • 53 OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Telecommunications costs should not increase, and may actuall ex erience a sli ht decline. Y p g Maintenance costs should increase by less than $1,000/year. Some increase in site license and database network fees will be incurred, at approximately $3,000/year. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, and is included in the Library's Five Year Plan. • ~~ 54 • DEPARTMENT: Library PROJECT TITLE: Headquarters Library Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs $682,000 $3.123,000 $3,805,000 Operating Cost $19,414 $38,830 $38,830 $97,074 DESCRIPTION The Headquarters Library project will provide a full service 33,500 sq. ft. primary research and centralized collection facility for all county residents. Headquarters is also the community library for the majority of citizens in the Cave Spring and Windsor Hills districts. This facility will include administrative support space, system storage, automation systems housing, and a technical service processing center for the joint Salem/Roanoke County cataloging operations. JUSTIFICATION Over 66% of the current structure will be 25 years old m 1998, and neither the ongmal structure nor the 1988 addition and renovation are adequate to meet the level of traffic and the changing business demands of today. The current level of usage, with 307,000 visitors and more than 330,000 circulation transactions per year, has placed considerable stress on the building. Continued growth will be difficult to physically sustain. At peak periods this building experiences critical shortages of work/study and reading seats. Additional concerns include updating inadequate electrical and technological infrastructure (particularly in the older section of the building), and the failure of the building to meet state guidelines for gross square footage. This project unifies the goals of two previous projects in the CIP (Headquarters Renovation and Southwest County Branch) and replaces those earlier projects with a much more cost-effective and budgetarily sustainable alternative. FUNDING SOURCES Funding would come from bond issue or general operating revenues. If the current property is vacated it can be sold to help offset the costs of a new site and building. Current appraised value of ~e property is $1,697,800. • 55 I~PERAfING Ii'UDGET IMPACT Personnel and operating costs would be far less expensive than adding a new branch. Operating costs would be $19,414 in FY 98-99, and $38,830 in FY 99-00 and following years. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. • • 56 • DEPAR'I'i~VIEN~': Library PROJECT TITLE: Vinton Parking Lot Expansion & Building Renovation Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-O1 Total Costs $33,000 $40,120 $73,120 Operating Cost $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $5,000 DESCRIPTION This project will expand the number of parking spaces at Vinton Library to a total of 30 spaces. Although State Library standards indicate a need for a minimum of 45 spaces, only a limited amount of land is available for the needed expansion. An agreement with the Town of Vinton must be reached on the use of the needed land. This project will place the parking expansion adjacent to current parking parallel to I~leadow Street; a currently placed exit from the War Memorial property would bisect the parking area. The project would also provide for some minor renovations and refurbishment of the Vinton Branch's interior. This would be the first major refurbishment of the branch in thirteen years. A limited amount of new furnishings and equipment would be placed in the public areas of the facility. JUSTIFICATION The 15 parking spaces at Vinton do not meet the County's minimum requirements for this type of facility (one space per 300 sq. ft. of building space). It also fails to meet state standards. Usage levels, with more than 109,000 visitors in the past year, have increased substantially in the past several years. Action is needed to remove this barrier to access, and to avoid a situation which prevents the County and the community from realizing the full potential of the Vinton Library's building, collection, and services, simply because people cannot reach the library. The minor renovations and refurbishment are needed to replace worn finishes and furnishings, particularly in the reading areas and the meeting room. New tables and chairs are needed in the meeting room, and new equipment is needed to support the library's educational programs. FUNDING SOURCES A proposed source of funding would be the general operating revenue. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT • Fundin of less than 1 000 g $ per year for maintenance of these improvements is needed. 57 RELATIONSIIIY?I'd~~OMPREHENSIVEPLAN This project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive plan and is listed in the Community Facilities Plan. • • 58 • D~P.ART.~IEI'tiT: PROJECT TITLE: Library Glenvar Branch Expansion and Renovation Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs $22,280 $176,500 $198,780 Operating Cost $1,000 $1,800 $1,800 $1,800 $6,400 DESCRIPTION This project will expand the size of the Glenvar Library by 1,200 square feet and provide additional readers' and work/study seats as well as an enlarged book stack area. Electrical and cabling for automation will be upgraded and lighting will be improved. Damaged and worn furnishings, fixtures and finishes will be replaced, repaired and/or restored. JUSTIFICATION The Glenvaz Libr was built in 1 ary 979, and after twent<~ years of steady use the public areas need some refurbishment. With over 55,000 visitors per yeaz, and a circulation workload of 88,000 per year (a growth in use of 25% since 1988), the facility needs to be expanded. The cramped and crowded public areas of the building do not effectively support the service demands placed on them. In addition, shelving is at maximum capacity, and expanded floor space is needed for stack areas. Electrical and automation cabling upgrades are needed to support current equipment and changing automation needs. FUNDING SOURCES Funding would be from general operating revenues. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Increased maintenance and utility costs would total $1.800 per yeaz. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. • 59 • DEPA1tT1VfF1`~T: Library PROJECT TITLE: Mason's Cove Branch Library Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs $122,550 $495,250 $617,800 Operating Cost $22,278 $67,900 $90,178 DESCRIPTION This project would provide a small branch library of 3,500 square feet with 15 parking spaces. It will bring County library services to a number of citizens who currently use the Salem library, and it will also replace the book station now located in the Catawba Community Center. The branch would include stack space, a reading area, and 12 to 15 work/study seats. A programming area for groups of up to 20 would also be included. This library will be designed to meet the popular reading, ready reference, and elementary level homework and research needs of the citizens who live in the areas served by Mason's Cove School. JUSTIFICATION Many of the residents of the Mason's Cove area must rely on the Salem Library for library services, and the services offered at the Catawba Book Station are rudimentary in nature. The book station does not have a phone and is not linked to the automated system; it has substandard shelving and a collection of donated books. The proposed project would provide basic library services to residents of the area and make those services more accessible. FUNDING SOURCES A proposed funding source would be a general obligation bond. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Budget impact would be increased personnel costs of $47,000 per year and $20,900 in operating expenses for the new branch. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project is consistent with the general goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. 60 DEPAI~T`MENT: Library PROJECT TITLE: Bent Mountain Branch Expansion Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs $51,837 $51,837 Operating Cost $500 $500 DESCRIPTION This project will expand the current Bent Mt. Branch with a 405 square foot addition. The new space will house children's materials, allow more open space for programs, and provide additional seating. JUSTIFICATION The Bent Mountain Branch has a collection which is 10% over the maximum capacity, and additional space is needed to house these materials. Well-attended programs are conducted in restricted, inadequate space. A shortage of seating becomes more critical as access to remote resources becomes increasingly possible; within the current limits of this facility it will be possible to offer an online access station only if some other service is displaced. An expanded facility would be designed to better accommodate public access to online resources. FUNDING SOURCES A possible source of funding would be general operating revenues. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Increased maintenance and utility costs should be approximately $500 per year. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. • 61 • • Parks and Recreation 62 • DEPARTIVfENT: Parks and Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Camp Roanoke Development Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs *50,000 *50,000 *50,000 **325,000 Operating Cost 37,930 37,930 37,930 DESCRIPTION This project consists of renovating Camp Roanoke as a residential camp and retreat center. Renovations include upgrading 8 residential cabins, three bathroom/shower facilities, dining hall/kitchen, lodge, and the construction of a new pool. JUSTIFICATION This site could potentially become a premier park facility within the system as a major regional park • with the potential to generate tourist as well as local interest. Repairs and renovations to Camp Roanoke will provide an exceptional site for youth programs and a revenue producing opportunity to cover partial operating cost of the program. The camp has cabins, pool, shelter, dining hall, a lodge, initiatives course, and trails which need improvement. This provides a unique opportunity to develop a one of a kind facility in the region. FUNDING SOURCES Currently, there is a Capital Campaign in place that is seeking to generate funds for a total renovation. The request above reflects the assumption that the campaign will be successful. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Requires additional part-time staff, utilities, and maintenance materials and supplies. Projected full year financial performance: Revenue 71,400 Expenses 109.330 (37,930) Operating expenses partially covered by fees generated by the camp programs. 63 RELA1'ICAti'SH1PT0 COMPREHENSIVE PLAv This project complies with the Comprehensive Plan. *Lower request assumes Capital Campaign is successful. **Actual projected cost to renovate • 64 • DEPARTMENT: Parks and Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Garst Mill Park Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs $17,000 $167,000 $184,000 Operating Cost 2,300 2,300 2,300 2,300 DESCRIPTION Stream bank stabilization, pedestrian trail access, upgrade restroom, additional picnic shelter, improve parking and paving, replace an old inaccessible bridge and landscaping. JUSTIFICATION The stream and streambank is a prominent recreation feature of this park. This stream is subject to flooding and has created significant erosion problems threatening existing facilities. This project should be completed before further damage occurs to park property. It will provide safer and healthier services, and will expand services as the bridges will improve accessibility for disabled patrons. FUNDING SOURCES Funding from general operating revenues or bond issue. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Requires additional part-time staff, utilities, and maintenance materials and supplies. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN None r~ 65 D1TME1~'T Parks and Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Land Acquisition;•District Park Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs $1,000,000 $65,000 $600,000 $1,665,000 Operating Cost $38,000 ~ $38,000 DESCRIPTION This project would purchase ~0+ acres of land in the Southwest County area, and develop a district park facility. This park would include athletic fields, trails, playground, picnic areas, tennis and basketball courts, and open play areas. JUSTIFICATION Roanoke County Public Facilities Plan for Parks identifies the need for purchasing park land with e priority being District Parks. There are significant deficits in many districts with regard to per capita land standards, with the most crucial need in the Cave Spring and Windsor Hills districts. FUNDING SOURCES Funding would be from bond issue. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Requires additional part-time staff, utilities, and maintenance materials and supplies. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This request is identified as a priority in the Comprehensive Plan. • 66 • DEPARTMENT: Parks and Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Green Hill Park Phase III Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs $32,000 $-10,000 $285,333 $767,333 Operating Cost $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $100,000 DESCRIPTION This project will continue development of Green Hill Park by providing an amphitheater, accessible playground, fencing, landscaping. two soccer fields with lights, football field, lights and electricity for special events, parking, outbuildings, trails, paving, barrier systems, and a maintenance yard. JUSTIFICATION This will continue to develop this site as the County's major events' and Glenvar youth sports facility. It will provide for a medium to stimulate and encourage growth in tourism and economic development. FUNDING SOURCES Recommended funding source would be general obligation bond. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Requires additional part-time staff, utilities, and maintenance materials and supplies. Estimated annual operating cost is $25,000. Opportunities exist to generate revenues through programming of special events. These revenues could offset operating cost. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project type is consistent with the general goals, objectives, and policies of the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. • 67 U DEPARTMENT: Parks and Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Community Recreation Center Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs $360,000 $7.200,000 $7,560,000 Operating Cost $260,000* $260,000* DESCRIPTION The project proposes to construct a 40,000 sq. ft. indoor Recreation Center to include a swimming pool, fitness area, multi-purpose program rooms, and gymnasium. The facility should be located in an accessible site adjacent to a significant population base. JUSTIFICATION • Previous capital plans have identified the need for indoor recreation space to accommodate existing senior, therapeutic, and general recreation programs in North Roanoke. Currently, the Parks and Recreation Department has no indoor recreation space in North County. Staff has to rely on libraries, churches, and schools to meet citizens' needs. The addition of amulti-purpose recreation facility will provide North County residents a wide variety of opportunities to participate in quality recreation experiences. A facility of this type could potentially serve the needs of the Glenvar and Catawba residents. FUNDING SOURCES Recommended funding for this project would be a general obligation bond issue. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Requires additional full and part-time staff, utilities, and maintenance materials and supplies. L'ser fees could cover a portion (75%) of the operating expenses. The net operating costs would be approximately $260,000. * This cost represents net operating cost. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project is included in the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. 68 C~ DEPARTMENT: PROJECT TITLE: Parks and Recreation Burton Athletic Complex Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs $51,000 $72,000 $24,000 $150,000 $297,000 Operating Cost $9,250 $9,250 $9,250 $9,250 $9,250 DESCRIPTION This facility is located adjacent to the Arnold R. Burton Vocational School and serves as the site for adult softball league and tournament play. It contains three regulation softball fields which supplement the state and regional tournaments held at the Moyer Athletic Complex and often is the only site for USSSA and NSA Softball Tournaments. This facility needs to have enlarged and paved parking, permanent restroom and concession building, landscaping, general security lighting, athletic field lighting improvements, playground and picnic shelter. • JUSTIFICATION This project contributes to the economic development of the community through tourism. In FY 92-93 over 8000 people visited the Roanoke Valley to participate in tournaments jointly sponsored by Salem and Roanoke County. These out of town guests spent approximately $1.5 million while in the valley. FUNDING SOURCES Recommended funding source would be general operating revenues. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Requires additional part-time staff, utilities, and maintenance materials and supplies. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project type is consistent with the general goals, objectives and policies of the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. • 69 DEPARTMENT: PROJECT TITLE: Parks and Recreation Vinyard Park Phase III Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs $40,000 $601,465 $641,465 Operating Cost $27,000 DESCRIPTION This project requests funding for expanding the playground, paving and additional parking, landscaping, traffic barriers, fencing improvement, ballfield lights, picnic shelters, and basketball courts to complete the master plan. Also included is additional parking, a bridge, trails, utilities, restrooms and other park amenities for the passive development of the Vinyard II tract. JUSTIFICATION This will complete the master plan, and provide a comprehensive regional park in the east County area. FUNDING SOURCES A proposed source of funding this project «-ould be a general obligation bond issue. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Requires additional part-time staff, utilities, and maintenance materials and supplies. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAti This project type is consistent with the general goals, objectives, and policies of the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. • 70 • DEPARTMENT: Parks and Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Walrond Park Phase III Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-O1 Total Costs $17,000 $290,000 $44,500 $351,500 Operating Cost $22,600 $13,600 $13,600 $13,600 DESCRIPTION This project will develop Walrond Park by adding a basketball court, expanded/improved parking, restrooms and storage, an upgraded playground, grading/drainage, trails, picnic shelter, security lighting, light two soccer fields, landscaping and amenities. JUSTIFICATION This will complete the development of Walrond Park as the North County Regional Park. FUNDING SOURCES A proposed source of funding for this project would be a general obligation bond issue. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Requires additional part-time staff, utilities, and maintenance materials and supplies. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project type is consistent with the general goals, objectives and policies of the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. • 71 • DEPARTMENT: Parks and Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Improvements for Parking Areas Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs $315,000 $255,000 $570,000 Operating Cost DESCRIPTION This project will renovate, repair, and expand the existing parking lots and access roads at 15 sites. The project consists of installation of base material and asphalt overlay. JUSTIFICATION Designated areas either do not meet zoning ordinances, are inadequate in size, have potholes and damage present, or exhibit a need to improve safe ingress and egress. FUNDING SOURCES Recommended funding source for this project would be general operating revenues. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT None. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project type is consistent with the general goals. objectives and policies of the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. • 72 • DEPARTMENT: Parks and Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Family Aquatic Center Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs $180,000 $3,000,000 $3,180,000 Operating Cost DESCRIPTION An outdoor, free form designed pool with water slides, a zero depth beach entrance, and water play features, with a separate child's aquatic playground. Included is a bathhouse/concession stand. This project would require 7-10 acres near a major highway and close to a large population base. Land costs are not included in this project. JUSTIFICATION There are no public pools in Roanoke County. The Comprehensive Plan indicates the need for public swimming facilities. These types of projects generally generate sufficient revenue to cover all operating and maintenance costs and can contribute to the County's economic development efforts. FUNDING SOURCES General obligation or revenue bond. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT The budget impact depends on the operating philosophy of the County. Staff recommends a design and pricing strategy to recover all operating cost and could potentially contribute to the debt service of construction. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAti The Comprehensive Plan indicates severe deficits of public swimming facilities in all districts. • 73 • DEPARTMENT: Parks and Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Brambleton Center Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-O1 Total Costs $180,000 $50,000 $65,500 $40,000 $25,000 $180,500 Operating Cost DESCRIPTION This project continues the renovation of the former RCAC facility on Brambleton Avenue into a Community Recreation Center with a focus on programming for senior adults, citizens with disabilities, teens, and youth. Phase II development will provide replacement carpeting and tile, HVAC improvements, landscaping and picnic areas, aesthetic improvements, paving, electrical upgrades, playground, painting, and improvements to the teen center. .IUSTIFICATION Phase I funding did not complete the necessary renovations. Many projects are capital maintenance types requiring replacement of old materials and/or mechanical systems. FUNDING SOURCES Funding from general operating revenue and/or general obligation bond. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT None RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project type is consistent with the general goals, objectives, and policies of the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. • 74 DEPARTMENT: Parks and Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Spring Hollow Park Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs * Operating Cost *DESCRIPTION The Spring Hollow Reservoir site and former YMCA Camp are on Dry Hollow Road adjacent to the reservoir. This project consists of developing the 700 acre site around the reservoir as a public park for fishing, hiking, picnicking, and other appropriate outdoor recreation interests. Development of the reservoir depends upon Health, Water, and Utility Department requirements, etc. Hayes, Seay, Mattern, and Mattern are currently developing a Master Plan and cost projections. .TUSTIFICATION This site could potentially become a premier park facility within the system as a major regional park with the potential to generate tourist as well as local interest. FUNDING SOURCES A proposed source of funding for this project would be a general obligation bond issue. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Not available until Master Plan is done and approved. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project is being developed within the Parks Master Plan. C~ * A Master Plan and related costs are currently being developed by Hayes, Seay, Mattern and Mattern. 75 DEPARTMENT: PROJECT TITLE: Parks and Recreation Whispering Pines Phase III i• • Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs $10,640 $152,000 $162,640 Operating Cost $8,200 $8,200 $8,200 DESCRIPTION This project will construct and develop approved restroom facilities, expand parking, add an additional picnic shelter, improve landscaping, upgrade the playground and add fencing. JUSTIFICATION It will meet the criteria for facilities in parks of this classification. FUNDING SOURCES Recommended funding source for this project would be general operating revenues. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Requires additional part-time staff, utilities, and maintenance materials and supplies. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project complies with the Park's Master Pl 76 • DEPARTMENT: Parks and Recreation PROJECT TITLE Merriman Soccer Complex Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs $42,500 $85,000 $127,500 Operating Cost $6,000 DESCRIPTION This request is to pave existing parking, add trails/walkways, improve landscaping, and light two remaining soccer fields. JUSTIFICATION These improvements will help expand the field capacity of a growing soccer program without constructing new fields, and it could allow the community to rest fields at Shell and/or Clearbrook parks for much needed turf renovations. FUNDING SOURCES General Obligation Bond or General Operating Revenue. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Requires additional part-time staff, utilities, and maintenance materials and supplies. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSI« PLAN This project is a new addition to the plan. • 77 • DEPARTMENT: Parks and Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Acquisition of Park Land Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs $500,000 $500,000 $1,000,000 Operating Cost DESCRIPTION The Parks and Recreation department needs to continue to acquire land for current outdoor recreation needs and to accommodate expected growth in demand for services. JUSTIFICATION The 1985 Comprehensive Plan indicated a significant deficit in park land and established standards and goals for acquisition. There continue to be deficits in almost all areas and at all levels, i.e., neighborhood, community, and district parks. In anticipation of the results of the on-going visioning and comprehensive planning process, resources need to be identified for acquiring needed park land. FUNDING SOURCES General Obligation Bond. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project meets the land acquisition goals as established in the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. • 78 L ~ DEPARTMENT: Parks and Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Craig Avenue Recreation Center Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs $11,500 $30,000 $37,000 $78,500 Operating Cost DESCRIPTION This project will install storm windows, floor tiles in the weight lifting and ceramic rooms, window blinds, improve parking, upgrade equipment, and paint interior/exterior at the Craig Avenue Recreation Center. JUSTIFICATION The storm windows and blinds will result in better energy management and working conditions. Floor tiles are needed for aesthetics and safety concerns. Painting will protect the facility from deterioration and improve aesthetics. FUNDItiG SOURCES Recommended funding source for this project would be general operating revenues. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Window treatments could reduce utility costs. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project complies with the Comprehensive Plan. • 79 DEPARTMENT: PROJECT TITLE: Parks and Recreation Picnic Shelters Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $160,000 Operating Cost $1,750 $3,500 $5,250 $7,000 $7,000 DESCRIPTION i• This project will construct and install accessible picnic shelters at Craig Center, Mt. Pleasant, Goode, Stonebridge, Oak Grove, Clearbrook, Brambleton Center, and Willie Martin parks. JUSTIFICATION It will meet the public demand for shelter reservations and provide a revenue producing source that supports the maintenance of the facilit}~. This project will improve the recreational opportunities within the County. FUNDING SOURCES Recommended funding source for this project would be general operating revenues. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Requires additional part-time staff, utilities, and maintenance materials and supplies. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project complies with the Park's Master and Comprehensive Plans. • 80 • DEPARTMENT: '~ Parks and Recreation PROJECT TITLE: Starkey Park Phase III. Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated. Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs $11,900 $170,000 Operating Cost DESCRIPTION: On hold until school decision is made. JUSTIFICATION FUNDING SOURCES OPERATING BUDGET I!11PACT RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN • 81 • • Planning and Zoning • g~ i ___ DEPARTMENT: PROJECT TITLE: i• Planning and Zoning Neighborhood Incentive Fund -Hollins Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-O1 Total Costs $30,000 $170,000 $200,000 Operating Cost DESCRIPTION This seed money will be used for incentive programs for private property owners to upgrade elements of their properties such as building facades, signs and on-site landscaping. JUSTIFICATION The improvements to US Route 11 (Williamson Road) in the Hollins community are an opportunity to achieve additional enhancements in this corridor. Funding allocated to this project will be used as seed money to construct landscaped gateways at entrances to the corridor. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT No additional operating funds are needed in the initial phase of this program. Program administration will require some additional staff time. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN None 83 DEPARTMENT: PROJECT TITLE: Planning and Zoning County-wide Greenways Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs $10,800 $350,000 $350,000 $350,000 $350,000 $350,000 $1,750,000 Operating Cost $10,000 $20,000 $30,000 $40,000 $50.000 $150,000 DESCRIPTION This project would initiate a long term on-going effort to acquire land and easements, and construct a system of trails and greenways throughout the county. The budget proposed would be sufficient to construct one mile of trail per year over the time frame addressed in the CIP. The trails would connect residential neighborhoods with schools, libraries, shops, and places of work and would provide for alternative modes of transportation (foot and bicycle) as well as enhance opportunities for recreation. JUSTIFICATION A system of Greenways can address a wide range of needs in a community, when appropriately designed and constructed. In addition to their function as alternative transportation routes and recreational opportunities, greenways can enhance adjoining property values, increase tourism, and boost economic development efforts. By following existing stream channels, greenways have also become important natural areas with educational value, as well as aide in improving air and water quality. Some communities have utilized greenways as an integral part of a comprehensive storm water management system, insuring that stream channels remain undeveloped and serve as flood storage areas, as a means of reducing downstream flooding. FUNDING SOURCES Funding for this project would initially come from grants, general obligation bonds, and the general fund. Additional sources including gifts, donations, non-profit fund raising efforts and other sources need to be developed. Incorporating greenway planning, design and construction into other public improvement projects, such as a system of storm water detention basins or installation of new sewer lines can substantially reduce the cost of developing a greenway system. • 84 OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT For each mile of greenway constructed, the cost of annual maintenance is estimated to be $10,000. This cost would include routine maintenance of the trails, signage and furniture and could be reduced by initiating an adopt-a-trail program.. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The proposed project is supported by the Policy Guidelines located in the 1985 Comprehensive Plan Resource Protection Guide. The development of a regional system of greenways and trails is strongly supported and endorsed by the citizens in the Roanoke County Vision - 2010 document just completed in 1995. • 85 • DEPARTMENT: Planning and Zoning PROJECT TITLE: Public Road Improvement Fund Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-O1 Total Costs $100,000 $50,000 550,000 $50,000 $250,000 Operating Cost DESCRIPTION This project is public road improvements that are constructed at various locations around the County. JUSTIFICATION The improvement of public roads improves the flow and safety of vehicles and pedestrians. Private land development's associated traffic impact often warrants the construction of off-site road . improvements to maintain and enhance traffic flow and safety after development occurs. The inclusion of this project in the CIP recognizes this need. State law provides that a private developer may voluntarily proffer to contribute to the cost of such off-site road improvements when a community has recognized the need for improvements and the land proposed for development is subject to a developer requested change in zoning classification. FUNDING SOURCES Recommended Funding Sources would be private contributions. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT None. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. 86 • PROJECT CATEGORY: PROJECT TITLE: Planning and Zoning Signal Light Installation Fund Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-O1 Total Costs $100,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $250,000 DESCRIPTION Signal lights installed at various locations around the County. JUSTIFICATION In certain situations, the installation of a traffic signal improves the flow and safety of vehicles and pedestrians at an intersection. Private land development and its associated traffic impacts often necessitate the installation of traffic signals at nearby and affected intersections. These traffic signals maintain and enhance traffic flow and safety after development occurs. The inclusion of this project in the CIP recognizes this need. State law provides that a private developer may voluntarily proffer to contribute to the cost of such facilities, when a community has recognized the need for the facilities, and the land proposed for development is subject to a developer requested change in zoning classification. FUNDING SOURCES Recommended Funding Sources would be private contributions. OPERATING BUDGET L~IPACT None. RELATIONSHIP TO CO`4PREHENSIVE PLAN Maintaining and enhancing traffic safety and flow is a policy consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. • 87 • PROJECT CATEGORY: PROJECT TITLE: Planning and Zoning Off-site Drainage Fund Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-O1 Total Costs $100,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $250,000 DESCRIPTION An off-site drainage fund. JUSTIFICATION In certain situations, the physical improvement of land can increase off-site drainage flows creating a detrimental situation for downstream properties. Although the County's on-site storm water management requirements are very effective in mitigating peak flows and rates of release, down stream improvements may be justified to fully protect the public's health and safety. The inclusion of this project in the CIP recognizes this need. State law provides that a private developer may voluntarily proffer to contribute to the cost of such off-site drainage improvements, when a community has recognized the need for the improvements, and the land proposed for development is subject to a developer requested change in zoning classification. FUNDING SOURCES Recommended funding source would be private contributions. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT None. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN • Improving stormwater management and protecting the health and safety of County residents are policies consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. 88 ~ Police • 89 • DEPARTMENT: Police Department PROJECT TITLE: Emergency Communications Equipment Upgrade Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs $333,380 $333,380 Operating Cost DESCRIPTION This project will upgrade emergency radio equipment currently being used by the Roanoke County Police Department. JUSTIFICATION The police department uses radios on an 800MHZ trunked system and also uses radios on a low- band statewide frequency. The mobile radios on the low band system vary in age, with some radios being twenty (20)+ years old and have not been manufactured for several years. Replacement parts for these low band radios are no longer available. Most mobile radios and portable radios on the 800MHZ are 8-9 years old. These radios, made by Motorola, are the Syntor and STX models which are no longer manufactured. Replacement parts for these models are becoming difficult to purchase, also. The current 800MHZ radios slated for replacement use analog technology and cannot be converted to digital technology, which is the direction to which major vendors are migrating. FUNDING SOURCES Recommended funded sources would be general operating revenues. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Maintenance charged by the Counn~ Radio Shop RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN None • 90 DEPARTMENT: PROJECT TITLE: • Police Department Mobile Data System Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs $357,200 I I I $357,200 Operating Cost DESCRIPTION This project will provide for the engineering, implementation, and operation of a mobile data system between the emergency communication center and police vehicles. JUSTIFICATION • The calls for service received in the communications center, coupled with increasing officer law enforcement activit~~, have reached levels that could affect officer safety which has greatly increase the stress level of communications center employees. A mobile data system will not only help reduce stress levels of communications employees but will increase the proficiency of field officers and add security to police communications. Data communications cannot be monitored by unauthorized, non- law enforcement persons. Field officers will have increased capability of inquiries to check for wanted persons, vehicles, property, and other information. total voice transmissions between field units and the communications center will be greatly reduced. FUNDING SOURCES Recommended funded sources would be general operating revenues. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Maintenance contracts RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN None 91 DEPARTMENT: PROJECT TITLE: • Police Department Firearms Range Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs $140,000 $140,000 Operating Cost $800 $800 $800 $800 $800 $4,000 DESCRIPTION This project is for construction of a firearms training facility. The requested funds will be used to construct a building to house a classroom, bathroom, and storage facilities. In addition, the funds will be used to install electrical service and build the necessary target racks and barricades at the site. JUSTIFICATION The use of deadly weapons is one of the most dangerous areas of police work. A tremendous amount of potential liability is associated with the use of deadly weapons. Each sworn member of the police department is trained in the use of firearms and is required to carry a firearm at all times. In order to maintain the necessary level of proficienc}~, officers must train as often as possible. Presently, our officers have no place that they can go and practice with their issued weapons. On a semi-annual basis the department conducts firearms training for all officers. The frequency of this training is mandated by the Commonwealth of Virginia. Currently, we are only able to conduct this mandatory training by using facilities owned by neighboring law enforcement agencies. This arrangement is suitable for department-sanctioned training, but individual. officer practice is not allowed. Our department has a very progressive firearms training program. We believe that this training program is largely responsible for protecting Roanoke County from great legal liability in the area of deadly weapons. For many years, the department's firearms instructors worked very hard to keep our training standards high in spite of the fact that we don't have a place to practice. • 92 FUNDING SOURCES Bonds OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Approximately $800 per year to include gas, oil, and maintenance. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN None • • 93 DEPARTMENT: Police Department PROJECT TITLE: Evidence Vault Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs $50,000 $50,000 Operating Cost $600 $600 $600 $600 $600 $3,000 DESCRIPTION The goal of this project is to build an addition (SEE ATTACHMENT) to the building which will house a new evidence vault. The addition will be located int he rear courtyard and share walls with the west wall of the gym and the north wall of the rear hallway. The project will include all walls, roofing, doors, etc., to complete the structure. The total area of the structure will be 1,600 square feet (interior footage). JUSTIFICATION The project is needed to provide secure storage of evidence to be used in criminal proceedings and maintain the legal chain of custody according to state and federal statutes. The existing vault is being used to house the department's archive files and as an evidence vault. Because of the volume of documents, the Department is required to archive (COV 42.1-82), the space in the existing vault is inadequate to house the volume of evidence brought in on a daily basis. The project will provide ample storage space for evidence as the existing vault will be used to house the archive fles. FUNDING SOURCES Bonds OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Routine minor maintenance and electricity. Approximately $600 per year. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN None U 94 • DEPARTMENT: Police Department PROJECT TITLE: Criminal Records System Improvement Program Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs $67,597 $67,597 Operating Cost $2,500 $2,500 $2,500 $7,500 DESCRIPTION The project would enhance quality of criminal history records. Procurement and implementation would provide data imaging technology. JUSTIFICATION The Roanoke County Police Department switched records management systems in 1992. The new filing system does not allow for a mutual indexing of prior records to those in the new system. Data imaging of both recent records as well as those from the past will provide for an improved retrieval of needed information. Data imaging should enhance the accuracy and completeness of criminal history information by making it readily available. Older records will also become readily available for any needed follow up of criminal records information from years past. FUNDING SOURCES Grant/Bonds OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Approximately $2,500 for Maintenance Contract RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN None U 95 • DEPARTMENT: Police Department PROJECT TITLE: Office Space Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs $70,000 $70,OQ0 Operating Cost $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $2,500 DESCRIPTION This project will convert a portion of current gymnasium space in the Public Safety Center to usable office and conference-room space. The renovation will to the extent possible use existing heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems. The total space involves approximately 45 x 41 feet or 1,760 square feet which will require construction of internal walls, floor treatment, electrical service, lighting, lowered ceiling, and some furnishings. The renovated space would house two division commanders, secretarial office, department conference room, training/library facility-, and Warrants office. Spaces would be: Two offices 13'6" x 21'2" Two offices 13'6" x 13'6" One office 13'6" x 17'0" Conference Room 17'0" x 26'8" Hallway 27'6" x 05'0" .TUSTIFICATION Renovation of the Southview Vocational School in 1987 for use as a police office facility was not completed in a fashion that utilized the most effective, functional law enforcement office design practices. The command staff (Chief and Division Commanders) are scattered throughout the building. No common conference space was constructed. Functions have been added, expanded, or reduced in the conversion from a sheriff s office to police department. This project will bring the command staff and related support functions to a more centralized location. The conference room would be utilized for department staff meetings, incident critiques, neighborhood watch meetings, applicant interviews, and other meetings with the public and departmental personnel. 96 The training room would accommodate the department's computerized interactive legal training program, purchased to lower training costs, by bringing training in as opposed to sending officers out. The area would provide a quiet place for officers to review policies, court rulings, and to prepare court cases. A portion of the room would be developed into a reference library which is badly needed. The training room would be equipped with a VCR so the use of training tapes could be viewed uninterrupted. FUNDING SOURCES OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Routine minor maintenance and electricity. Approximately $500 per year. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN None • • 97 • • Procurement 98 • DEPARTMENT: Procurement PROJECT TITLE: Print Shop Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs $104,817 $27,414 $29,027 $161,258 Operating Cost DESCRIPTION Establish a print shop to be used by County departments for large (over 50 copies) printing jobs. These jobs would range from business cards, flyers, brochures and booklets to multi- part forms. This would require an initial investment in capital equipment and the employment of two (2) staff positions. JUSTIFICATION Roanoke county spends approximately $100,000 annually on outside printing. With an in-house print shop we estimate an annual savings of approximately $50,000 after operating and personnel expenses are considered. If placement and sizing of departmental copiers were placed under the direction of a print. shop it is estimated that an additional $20,000 could be saved annually. This would be achieved through reduction in rental fees, operating and per copy costs. FUNDING SOURCES Proposed funding source for this project would be the General Operating Revenue. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Procurement's operating costs would increase but this should be offset by reductions in operating costs of those departments being served by the print shop. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project is not included in the Comprehensive Plan • 99 • ~ Roanoke County Courts • ioo PROJECT CATEGORY: • PROJECT TITLE: Courthouse Entrance Renovarion for Security Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs $125,000 $1.25,000 Operating Costs $27,000 $27,000 $27,000 $27,000 $27,000 $135,000 Courts DESCRIPTION This project involves construction of one central entrance to the Roanoke County Courthouse, the installation of a metal detector and a deputy workstation for increased security for citizens and employees conducting court business. JUSTIFICATION Currently there are two separate entrances to the Courthouse facility that lead to various courts. There • are no personnel or metal detectors currently in place to prevent weapons or other contraband from entering the facility. FUNDING SOURCES General operating revenues are recommended as funding sources. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT Additional personnel would be needed to staff the workstation entrance. A bailiff position with fringe benefits would cost approximately $27,600. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This project type is not addressed in the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. • 101 • Sheriff • • 102 DEPARTMENT: PROJECT TITLE: Sheriff Renovation of Roanoke County and Salem Jail Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated I Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 Total Costs I $165,000 ~ $1,199,505 I I ( I I $1,364,505 Operating Cost DESCRIPTION This project will renovate the 6th floor of the Roanoke County-Salem Jail facility located at 401 East Main Street, Salem, to create a dormitory style floor which will contain 26 beds and program space, and adding an additional seventh floor to the existing structure, with the addition of a 54-bed dormitory for direct supervision of minimum security inmates. The jail maintenance shop will be located outside the jail structure, allowing room for expansion of the kitchen facility to enable higher capacity in food services. JUSTIFICATION • The current population exceeds capacity of up to 100% on many weekends creating overcrowded conditions that jeopardize the safety of the inmates and staff. FUNDING SOURCES Prior Year Funding (Salem 25% reimbursement & the Commonwealth of Virginia has approved 25% of $1,550,000 of allowable costs which equals $387,500 for total project) FY94/95 & FY95/96 FY96/97 Salem $ 41,250 $ 519,500 State $ 28,505 $ 358,995 County $ 95,245 $1,199,505 OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT The total operating budget impact would be $771,242 for salaries and benefits for 28 full-time positions and $106,276 for maintenance, vehicles, and equipment (some costs such as vehicles and uniforms, would not be incurred every year). Relationship to Comprehensive plan • Conforms to the policies in the Comprehensive Plan. 103 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARb OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON FEBRUARY 27, 1996 RESOLUTION 022796-7 CERTIFYING E%ECUTIVE MEETING NAS HELD IN CONFORMITY KITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the Certification Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. lton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Executive Session ! ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 13, 1996 RESOLUTION 022796-8 OF APPRECIATION TO JOHN MOLUMPHY AND LARRY MILES, FIRE & RESUE VOLUNTEERS, FOR OVER 25 YEARS OF DEDICATED SERVICE TO THE COUNTY OF ROANORE WHEREAS, Roanoke County is indebted to the volunteers who provide fire and rescue service during evening and weekend hours to the citizens of the County; and WHEREAS, these men and women dedicate countless hours, unpaid but appreciated, to ensure the safety of the people and property of Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, due to the complexity of family and business life, few volunteers are able to maintain this type of commitment over a long period of time, as demands on their time and energy increase; and WHEREAS, Roanoke County wishes to recognize those people who have been able to continue in service to the citizens of the County, and has established a Quarter Century Club for the volunteers who have served for over 25 years; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, on its own behalf and on the behalf on the citizens of the County, does hereby express its deepest appreciation to the following dedicated citizens for over twenty-five years of service as volunteers with the Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Department: JOHN MOLUMPHY AND LARRY MILES; and FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that they are hereby certified as a member of the Quarter Century Club for Volunteers in Roanoke County. ,~ , On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Harrison, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. olton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Resolutions of Appreciation File Thomas C. Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue i s ACTION NO. a ITEM NUMBER " AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 27, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution of Appreciation and Recognition of Volunteers with Over 25 Years of Service to Roanoke County COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS,:( /' f~a.,,~s ~~, f~Cf= / !' `y/! /CSG ~°c f.~a'n Qn..I o~I<'/ i7 t:r JGs~tc.Tfc/ /lr~un~c'P.-! . BACKGROUND• Roanoke County has established a "Quarter Century Club" for employees with over 25 years of employment with the County, and volunteers who have devoted over 25 years of service to the citizens of Roanoke County. These employees are recognized at a Board of Supervisors meeting where they receive a plaque honoring their service. Listed below are the names of those volunteers who have over 25 years of service, and who will honored at this time. John Molumphy - 25 years Cave Spring Fire Department Larry Miles - 25 years Vinton Fire Department STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt the attached resolution of appreciation and recognition. The volunteers have been invited to attend this meeting, and will be presented with individual resolutions and plaques honoring their service. a ~~ 1 Submitted by, Approved by, Amy Sh for Elmer C. Ho e Fire & Rescue Volunteer Coordinator County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) Harrison To ( ) Minnix Nickens - T-I AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 1996 RESOLIITION OF APPRECIATION TO FIRE & RESCUE VOLUNTEERS, JOHN M. MOLUMPHY AND LARRY MILES, FOR OVER 25 YEARS OF DEDICATED SERVICE'TO THE COUNTY OF ROANORE WHEREAS, Roanoke County is indebted to the volunteers who provide fire and rescue service during evening and weekend hours to the citizens of the County; and WHEREAS, these men and women dedicate countless hours, unpaid but appreciated, to ensure the safety of the people and property of Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, due to the complexity of family and business life, few volunteers are able to maintain this type of commitment over a long period of time, as demands on their time and energy increase; and WHEREAS, Roanoke County wishes to recognize those people who have been able to continue in service to the citizens of the County, and has established a Quarter Century Club for the volunteers who have served for over 25 years; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, on its own behalf and on behalf of the citizens of the County, does hereby express its deepest appreciation to the following dedicated citizens for over twenty-five years of service as volunteers with the Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Department: JOHN MOLUMPHY AND LARRY MILES; and FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that they are hereby certified as members of the Quarter Century Club for Volunteers in Roanoke County. ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~ "' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 27, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Public Hearing to Elicit Citizen Comment on the Upcoming Annual Budget for FY 1996-97. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: /. ~ z pry GO,,, ,,, C,~ ~S _/ // c rCcc.i~~r. c T L ~ cfdr~IJ Po/ /n II gg II / rrr~.~ r r_ $/1 o~~c. in~ /1HFClS Q~/~ GagLB~nl Ui/~i c-ry ~~, ry /E fr ~~Pli ~ ~ne~ ff // 1 // /! D a s it Ga~~/ % ~7NSE $cter~/['37. 0/s1 [J;`/ ~G; Gc>ny', UPre~ 't~7 r / r ~/ n c. ~ ~ < < cf~ G / ~ / /ci..~ J . SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This time has been set aside to receive written and oral comments from the public concerning the upcoming annual budget for FY 1996-97. Respectfully submitted, Brent Robertson Budget Manager Approved by, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved () Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied O Eddy _ _ _ Received () Harrison _ _ _ Referred () Johnson _ _ _ To () Minnix _ _ _ Nickens _ _ _ v` y` ~, AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 1996 RESOLUTION 022796-9 APPROVAL AND ADOPTION OF THE SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM SIX YEAR CONSTRUCTION PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996- 2002 AND APPROVAL OF THE ALLOCATION OF FUNDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996-1997. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on February 27, 1996, to receive comments on the adoption of the Secondary Road System Six Year Construction Plan for Roanoke County for Fiscal Year 1996- 2002; and the adoption of the Funding for Fiscal Year 1996-1997; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors does hereby approve the adoption of the Secondary Road System Six Year Construction Plan for Roanoke County for Fiscal Year 1996-2002 and allocations for Fiscal Year 1996-1997 as set out on the attached Secondary System Construction Program. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution duly attested be forthwith forwarded to the Virginia Department of Transportation Salem Residency Office along with a duly attested copy of the proposed Second Road System Six Year Construction Plan for Roanoke County for Fiscal Year 1996-2002 by the Clerk to the Board. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Y Brenda J. olton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Virginia Department of Transportation Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance ~'~ H y 0 m 1 In o r N I-1 .~ Ih o ~ m m m ~ .~ m m o 0 F 1 m n o O I In m .~i I t H 1 n v M In o 0 1 1 r N • 10 . r • m m I . N N N N N N 1 1 I N f? N N N VF 1 i ~ o n o o .~ w 1 n .d a al o m W 1 m rl .-1 m o n x 1 • H 1 In m In In a 1~f Q 1 OI N t+1 01 P N o r to In o N N ri ri ri ~ 1.1 1 N Vk N Vk !? K z o I M H 1 I m m o m N n S 1 0 .~ r m u of G P W O i .i to r Ifl T N x 1 1 m o .~1 rl r a Q ~ 1 I 'dl t0 OI (~ 10 m 10 m 1-1 b N 'YI a ~tl 1 N V} N N • • U I 'i .d 1 1 O F 1 ~ O r n u u oa 1 1 to ri o a a ~ 1 m n o a1 •i o H I n M o VI v 0 1 N 1 o al Ifl ri VI 1"1 1 M N I~1 m VI N $ I N t? .-1 ri li ri D7 1 VF 1h V1 fh z 1 1 I 1 r m m o li N ~ m m a o 1 0 1 0 1 to 1 n 1 m m o .i ~1 1 m m of m o 0 1 m m of m o 0 1 ri r'1 r1 ~ N N r r~ r 0 M N li n ~; v m K m HI N N m ~i m i y i F F a ~ 1 1 1 1 ~ ~ ; 1 I 1 i H I ~ ~ Q A ~ Q 1 ~ 1 I i U ~ F 1 1 1 1 1 1 Id 1 ~o 1 1 1 1 1 1 I H i 1 N ~~ z 1 ~ 1 ~ j ( ~ Q 1 () 1 /~ ~ ° ~ ~ u 1 1 ~ ~ ~' ~ rQ, ~ a w 1y 1u Q 1 {~ 1 1 a 1 1 1 ~ Er 1 O 1 O i q I i W I ~ ~ ~ D 1 1 1 I 1 v 1 1 1 ~'~`~ N z o ~ 0 0 m O O O ~ H N U U H M M H x ~ o C s~ P a a a s H i i 1 i ' ~ F ~ q F i 1 m 1 H ~ F ~ F 'qy y ~ ~~7i 1 1 N ' m 1 D z i W U 1 W~ i 1 1 F ' O ' O ~ U ~ i i m _- i W U ' U __ ' U ~ 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 X 0 0 0 0 O O O O i 0 0 0 0 m m ' U F~. i i 1 ~ i i i 1 ~ ' i ~ H a ' i i i i ' i U 1 1 i 1 i i o 0 0 o i o 0 0 0 ~ o 0 0 o i o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 N o 0 o 0 0 .1 0 0 O N N O N 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 ' ' ' ~ m 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 X 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 O O Q N O O N O ~ . O O O O O O N N O O I 1 1 1 I 1 I a N I~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 ~ . I 1 1 1 ~ 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 .-1 N 1 0 0 0 0 O O r ~ O O r O b b ~ N mm ~ N N A N N ~ m N 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 ' 1 1 ~ I ~ I 1 1 ' ' 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 n1 w1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 X 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 O O b b N N O O D O q O O b b r r O O O O r~ A N .{ ~ O N N T q ~ m N 1f1 o [J ~ m to 0o rr rr m l q N N N N m '~ ei M A 1 . . 1 o a .+ o f i 1 1 i 1 1 [9 N 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~ , _ _ - _ ~ _ _ _ - ~ G .. 1 1 1 1 I . ' ' a~ + .-+---- +------+------+---- +------+- -+- -' l o 0 0 o i o 0 0 0 ~ o 0 0 0 ~ o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 o i o o ~ v' 1 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 ~+' 00 N 7 ~®[-.1~ q O O O O O O A q O O H O A U 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1'1 1'1 0 0 F q u m r b to .-i .y ui w b b o 0 UU '7 OI .-1 '1 N N r~ rl ~' • ei ei °a N 1 1 , i ~ i i i 1 m a z r . 1 1 U 1 0 0 0 0 l o o m vl i o o r r l o o m m 1 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 b O O b b m m n n O O O O O O O 01 r 0 0 b b m N m m O O 0 0 0 O O OI OI . • • . • , . , . , N 1 O O ~' •' M m 0 m m A N O O mm ~b n.+ rr ~'•' ~~0 00 T N N M N q A A N ~ 1 1 1 1 i i ' i i 1 1 i 1 i 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 i 0 0 m m 1 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 m ut 1 0 0 0 0 i 0 0 N In 1 0 0 0 0 O O N~ ~~ 1.1 N O O O A A O O z z q o o n m m o 0 o r r o 0 O w a O O r r 1.1 M m m N ui 41 .•1 N N N M M PI r r r' ! r r V' • ~ a O r r ~ 1 1 ~ ~ I N~ a 0 0 r r ~' • m N ~' r' I 1 I 1 I I 1 N N 1 I q m I .-1 .•, i 1 1 1 1 __ ~ ' 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 m m 1 0 0 0 0 i 0 0 N m 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i m I O O r r ~ O O m m ~ O O b b 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 O O O~ I O N b N I O O b b i 0 0 N ei 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 ~ O O O F O m N N O O b b O m b N m O N O O O p r m m O .•i m m m N O m r r N ~' V' r r m m °„ b b r N O N V m V' 1.1 N N m N AI m .-1 M m N 1 i 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 X 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 i 0 0 N 1I1 X 0 0 0 0 O O 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 O O O 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 PI 1.1 1 0 O O i (~ O O I O N O 1fl 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 i 0 0 r r 1 0 O O RI . V N . . , r m . . b r . . . m b V b • • • q a • • • m ~ ' F 0 0 g O l O m O m T OI 1 0 0 0 0 01 01 I O m m O m A 1 Itl O O N g A I O N V O A I m O m F I.1 1.f g O 1 N O b m OI A I N O O N q OI i r N N~ 41 m I r r 1'1 r of m I O O b 01 m I r N r T T `~f(~ m O O N N 1 N V b N .r N rl N b! N A N~ ei N N n N .r 1 N m O N N e+ m N N F U N rl b b N N m N N! N 0 0 N 01 N r' r b r b m O O O O O N N N O O O O O O 1 m ~ I I . m37.F qp ' m37.F pp . m$?.F Op ' m3SGF pp ' m37.F pp ' m3zF pp ' m37cF q ~ ' B O O ~ U 1 B O O ~ U 1 o O~ U ~ ~ o O~ U 1 B O O '~ U' ~ o O .~ U 1 B O O ~ u I a a U F m I r a U F m l r a U F m 1 r a U F m 1 r a U F m 1 r a U F m 1 r a U F m~ 1 u o m m ~ ~ n O b r w b ' 'O .} a .w .~ a .i 1 .r r K 0 o m o m o m ~ o m r m m N F N b F n m o u N z rz+ u a .. z ~O u z °u N z u a r. z~ u a w x o m a n u H xo R xo a xo ~ xo nmOOlr .;m b ~ F m ' q b M [-~ A z w N m F N '1 z rc~ m oN oo~. iT.N m~j !Gm µ;o!•1 m o~' ion 4b~ ion "oaa K 'L ~ q ' a N '1 .' Ifl O N 1 m N D f.l U 1~ N r .+ m 1 M N V P i O 1 H O p rq 1 M O P 1 M m P' a' M O .+ P 1 a' t+ I ua I z o N N O a 1 x o x N O a i ~ o xF.o a .7oxboa oqa a ox m 1 m '!j~. m F 1 m o N F I U m m F F I a m o •• F I m o F 1 mmm m w 1 k I m ~ .Y O m m pp m 1 3 0 .•1 ~~pp m O O F pppp m HH O e1 m m m' '!. O of a mm m 1 X O YI U F O~ q 1 w I F F m 'F 1 0~ F F .'G I m 1 O H 7. 1 Z' F F T. ' FI I O F 7r I H 'L ~~ o i oG n a a U' O 1 a m o a U' O b o Iq U' O 1 O o o a U' O' a ~+ 0 7. U' O' a .i o .7 p a ~ K P o aG .~ y U 1 a b U g~ U' a N- U' a o y U 1 a o- wm a pl o o o b a" o M m b z o~ ~ a a o~ I o r a o~ m o b K o M o b a oC F>~ m a ~ um ~ ~orFa~a ~ p.orFao°Z r,orFaa~ uorFaa 1 taorFa°~ 1 Door mo I b 0 N--- 1 0 V' b--- ± N V N--- 1 N •I N 1 O O U N O O b m b M r A N O N O O tl I O O r .. 1 1 ~ _ 1 o a --. b m r .. b m b .. b n n' .. r n +' b o .. b o b [-I ' 1 ' ~ O V F Ifl O V U N U ., i m 1 m O 1 o n n [r ~ o n ~ o to ~ orb F U M „ 1 F r O 1U~ ~y q~' N~" ~ U ~ n /1 [a-1 E i O ~ m m m i m (0..' ~ m (L m ~ [ m. ~ m ~ [ m. ~ m ~ m ~ m ~ m ~ m H O 1 a i~" .. .. K R .. , ~' •• E' o, `• , ~ .. .. ~ 4 .. , p .. .. ~' R .. ~ P •• ~ 4 •• ~ ~ - ~ 'F[ ~ ~ ~ .. .. ~' R ..• q U I O U g F F ' O U g O F ~ O U g O F ' O U g O F I O U g O F ' O U g O F ' O U g O F ' I a F M m m I a F t+ U m I a F M U m I a F 1-I U m I a F 1+ U m ' a F M U m ' a F M U m b a N N 0 b A m O D ~~ ~~ e VVV~~_ V y K K z z ~T11 z a 3 0 ~ 0 0 pz O O , .. , .i M I a F a F Qy N U R E K F F U R F I I I I a s a s a s a h a F a H I I I _ I I I I H . F I ' ~ I F pz ^z ~ y I I y I m I I I I I y I P. U , ~ z i ~ U ~ p. 0 ~ O I I i p i O I G ' O , U I u u I u I u _ _ _ _ + 0 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 o I o o N N l o 0 0 0 N N r r w y V$ F Rm F O I I I N N I I I . ' , I U I I I I I I I I I I I l o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 o I o o r r l o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N n n o 0 o ~ u ~ r r e e O N y O N 1 I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I l y 10 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 I O O O O I O O O O I O O O O 1 0 0 0 0 z o 0 0 0 O ~ 0 0 0 0 H O F o 0 0 0 of .~ .I r r O '^ w 0 N I 1 I I I I I ' I 1 1 1 I I I I I I + + _ + ______ + ____ + _~____ + O O O O _ + _~___ • ___~ • ~__~__ + I O O O O I O O O O 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 I O O w w 0 0 0 0 O O r r 0 0 O O O O O O O O . . . on woi nn I°no w h w w .11 w N 1 I I 1 1 1 I ' I I I I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 I O w y r 1 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 O O O O w N N O O w 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 b n r O O w N ~ O O M N ei N 0 0 b PI O O O O O O N Yl h O O y y N N M y w ri rl N H N n N ri M w I I I 1 I I I I O a N O 1 I I I I 1 N I I I I I I I [[p~~ I I I I I I I I a y + + _ + _ _ _ _ _ _ + _ _ _ _ _ _ + _ _ _ _ + _ _ _ _ + _ _ - _ _ _ + _ _ _ _ _ _ + _ __ __ _ + aa'' I O O O O 1 0 0 0 0 I O O n n 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 I N N O M 1 0 0 0 0 y i( 0 0 0 0 r r O O O O O N O N O O ~ O~ 7 M q O O O O ~ ~1 O O O O O Y1 PI m O O (~( ~1 q Y [UI I O O Y1 y V b y Ifl b O b O PI I•'1 O O ~i p Q O w N N n n w w rl N O O O r P y YI N N .-1 r I/I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' w z n l I I I I I I I I U w • +. +..__ i __..__ ~ O o 0 0 __ + ____._ +.__.._ + _.___. +._.___ + I O wl O n 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 I m O O m I O O O O to ror o 0 00 0 o n n w n r o r o 0 0 0 0 o r r w w . N 0 0 0 y y O O r r w w b m a n r r N •+ r r N N N N w N I I I I I I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I O M O M 1 0 0 0 0 I O O A M 1 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 I O O O O r o r o 0 o r r o 0 0 t o 0 0 l o 0 0 0 l 0 0 0 07. r o r o 0 o n n o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O M R O O O y Yf O .~ .~ Y1 e•1 b O O O O O O O O O O 1 I I 1 I 1 F F m O m n m » y N y b N M Y1 I(1 O y 0 N O N 1 1 I 1 I I I I F D m N N N N N MI b Ifl Y1 N N 1 1 I 1 I I I I I M d l I I I I I I q a I I , I I I N N I I~ 1 I I I I I --_--- 1 I y I I I I I ' __ _--~__ y + _ .. _ _ _ + _ _ _ _ i I I O~ O N I O O O O 10 0 n N I O O O O 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 I O O O O y o 0 0 O O O O O O 0 7i O y y 0 0 O O le b O O O O M F O w ~ O O ~ ~ I'1 n O N h y ~j ~ YI r1 rl ei Ifl n N N N a I I I I I I I I I I I I I I __ ' I l o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 l o a o o l o 0 0 0 t o 0 0 l o 0 0 0 t o 0 0 l o 0 0 0 l 0 0 0 q 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 t o 0 o I o 0 0 0 l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l 0 0 0 b IMq r m I n m n m m w I m w i ..~I N I ..~ N~ w I F I O O O O w w I O y y O w w I O n N w w I O ul r~1 b w w l v1 O N w w I O O O O O O I O 0 0 0 O I H I N O O N w w I ei N n O w w N O N w w I N N 1n m w w l r YI n w w I Yf O In O P P I N O N O O \ j~ O N y b N N N N N N N N N '/ N I N N N N b y N N N N N N N n I F U b O m N m y O m O m N n r N r N N y O N O O O O N O N_ O O N O N \ I r I I I o I r 3 Z F pp r 3 Z F q r 3 Z F g I r 3 Z F g I r X Z F~ q~ r 3 74 FOI g q~ r 3 Z F~ q l I I \ O O U~ \ O O U ~ \ 0 0 U I \ 0 0 U I \ 0 0 U \ O \ 0 0 U I •• I _ I a a U F~ r I a a U H~ r I a a U F~ r I a a U F~ m I a a U H_ r I a a U F_ r I a a U H_ r l .~• I - + .-_. ~ -___ K - ~ ' m ~ r r n n I'I U w w N N K N O r y i b G p v 3 b to r ~O D7 a ...+ ~ .+ a e. K< r o ., W m o a a o O o r F O r O n r a o r r a n r a I` OI y r M a In F y r a le F r In F F U b F % „ K N~ q U Ha ~$~ a O K U Z P a F pl U a a O ~'j~1I i C7 01 a b O U n F Z I RI F v H KO N N m I N r y H M r y y H N r r F M > m~ • w b$ O • a .y F y r N q N b M p b i a O ~ a n 3 r r O l ,` m H K~ K m I-I ~ h a w a i a w b a ~ I¢ r .+ w ~~.II I K y s a I M N y a N y U N iC p I q N y K I g N I O r U I O (q O a~ F H O I [2r M r W I{ I r a I F ~ O I I F ~ a I a F Q a I N M m U a ~ a X ~ p o y; 5 F Oo P o E F r o X~ RI I r o X o o H a o a o X, o r y »> m r r F O m o a o m o r y ..7 m y b I m b >. m F m K r o .-I F 7C o N R F r x o N U K o 0 o q Iil I K o o ~ a F o F F trl ~ F o o~~ K b O q ~ I a~ I p a I a q[[~~ I O U' I q l tttJJJJJJ U' K H I Z Z F fff+++ I ttt~~i w ~ ~ q m 0 (7 ~ F O O a a F H O O~ r ~ n O 0 a q ~ O A g r I M N H M V O I M N O O q r l w ~ I i O N 2 ~c I y n a p hF I y n- a H I b •• a F I a N r U > IO a M r I .+ O I Obao l oba >F I Obarrt I mao{y a maFaa l ~ibao~r l UbaFaa l \ y a l ~oaHaG I aon.°~oa I ao~a3 I .IPIFIi01 ~ 5.rmyau I ac.+mFaa I z.,~mwu I N m r r I O w 1 0 /I m I n ea I n N In I N n I N 1. \ N r n n b N n V N b n Y1 b n Y1 I b ei b .-1 N [-~ b N b .. b r .~. b r .+ m b n .. I O b n .•. b n ~+ b n .-. I I I I I I U Cl ~.I I O H r O N PI F O b O b F rl r N ei r N F m '1 N F ri N N0.' ~ F U b CRi n U n .~I Cqi m .~I .• r~ °' .. u w • F ~ I O m ~ i r R r m ~ r ~ SKI ~P.:I ~ r ~ ~ ~m~II [o.G m ~ (K. ~ r ~ ly-I O I a !6" .. ~ a .. , ~ .. .. ~ 4 .. ~ ~ - - ~ 4 `•' ~ H Z O .., i ~ .. .. ~ p .. i b .. 7, 4 •• i ^ - ~ R " q q U I O U g O F I O U g O F O U g O F O U g O a I O U O O a I O U g O F I O U g O F I I a F F U y I a F F U y I a F w U y I a H F U 1• I a F M U RI I a F w U y I a F M U y I o ~•~ a a g 4 3 0 ~ 5 3 ZO p [ p. C w ~ w o\C F w a\' F 7'~ U .~ KK u ai a a s a s a s a I I I I I I I I ~ F I F I I a °x a s a F F I ~ H I i I I ' F I N I q I q ; I I N I z I z I I ~ U I U I U -- I U I I - . O I I U ~ _ } _ - _ _ } _ _ - _ } _ - _ . _ _ } I I W U M I ~ Z __ I ~ O I ~ O I O I l o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 ~ o o r~ l o 0 0 0 l o o~ r l o 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 N b 0 0 a a N N n n o 0 0 0 0 u ~ ~~ ': is 00 000 O a 'O '° ~ ~°. r n n o 0 F ~ N N I I I I ~ ' I I U I I I I I ' ~ I i _ } _ _ _ I } - - _ _ - - i - _ - - - _ } - - - - - - i - - - - _ - } - - i - _ _ } 1 0 0 q O~ 1 0 0 0 0 S O O T C1 1 0 0 00 00 0 0~~ 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 r r o o N r o o l o o 0 0 0 0 o N o o r r o 0 0 0 0 O ry H ~~ H M p N b b 0 0 N O N N N N N N N N N Al M N N N f b O N N N N m m O N I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I q 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 I O r N N O O O O 1 0 0 0 0 I Yi O O O O O O O O P •-1 b 1 0 O O 1 0 O Q N O O O O O O O O N O~ f O O O O O M O . . H N N N N 0 0 O O ri N r N N O N N K O N~ a• ~ O N N N N r r .+ N n n U O N N N r a I I I I I I O oN l a I I I I I C I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I _ I -- ------ ------*------*---- }---- *------} 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o b a o l o 0 0 o N n o m l o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b N O O I m N Hf 1 0 O 0 0 0 0 o m N o a N a o 0 0 o ~ o o N~ m~ a N o w+ m m o 0 a o o ~ .+ N m r ~' d' q N N P N ~ ~ I I I 1 I 'I I I I I I I I I I I • i } 1 _ - } _ _ _ - _ _ } _ . _ _ _ _ } _ _ - _ _ } _ _ - _ - - } - - - - - - } --~ - - ~ i I O T N O 1 0 0 0 0 I N E O N 1 0 0 0 0 I N O O N 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 r N 0 1 0 O O I~ T 1 0 O O I N N I A O q O I O O O n b I O O O I •II T r~ ~ O~ N i ~( I r N 0 1 0 O~ 1 0 N N 1 0 0 0 b b O U m N N N I ri N I O! P I P A N I A '"I q A N N N N N A N 1 I I I I 1 ~ I N N A O I M I N I I I I O I I I I I I N I I I I I I ~ ~ I I I I I I I ~, p m .~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 a o o a o 0 0 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ N IC O r N O O O .I N .Ti N y m m O 01 O O O b b pp'' N O A U r N O O O a N Ij F (~ Y a r N N N P Y P T U tJ q N N I O F H w •m+ I I I I I . I ~ I I I I I I I I q 'R r l I I . I I I I I I U I .I o o N l o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 b N N a r a a O~ . N N N r r w A I . I I I I I I I I I I . I I . I I + - - - - - - } - -- - - - i - - - - - - - - i - - - - - - } - - - - I o 0 0 o I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 O O 1 0 0 0 0 ~ O O O 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 I z z G ~ 0 0 0 o I o 0 o I o 0 0 0 0 o I o 0 0 o I o 0 o I o 0 0 0 I o~-166a17 I o000 ~ 0 00 ~ 0000 00 ~ 0 000 ~ ui v±o ~ 0000 N I O N O N N O N M O N O I P b O 0 0 0 0 I r r N I O N O N I 1 I I N N N r N N nl N N O wf In wl N n M N O r1 1 I I I I I I H d N n m I 1 I I I I I 1 I m a I I I N N I I N N I I .I N I I I I 1 I I~ a I I I I __ I __' i------~ I i------~---- - - i - - - - - - ' - - - - } - - - - I o 0 0 0 - - I o 0 0 o I -~ o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 o Z N H a I I I I I I I I I l o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 t o 0 0 l o 0 0 0 t o 0 0 l o 0 0 0 t o 0 0 l o 0 0 0 i p l o 0 0 0 t o 0 0 l o 0 0 0 t o 0 0 l o 0 0 0 t o 0 o I o 0 0 0 . N (•1 I . N . . . AI N I a i F o 0 0 0 0 0. o 0 0 0 o i o 0 0 0 0 0~ 0 0 0 0 0~ o 0 0 0 0 0~ N N o 0 o i o 0 0 0 0 0 l r~ F I o N o N o o N o N o o N o N o 0 o a• b o 0 o I o 0 0 0 0 o I r r N o o~ ono N o 0 a N I N N N r N N N N N N n1 N .1 O N N N n N N I~1 n n 01 N N N w1 N N I N N O N N N \ O r F U f N s N N N m N m N N N m o e+ .i N N N q O A O N O N O A O N O N N O \ I pp I p I ~.I I Q I o a 3 T. F qq I a 3 z F Ip~ pu a 3 z F rq~ A I a 3 2 F rp~ G~ a S ~ ~+ U~ a~ 0 O B i"; O U~ I I I l a \a' O F C7 o~G a K U F Iq PI I a K U F pl W I a o6 O F pt Ua I a a U F W a I a a U F pl Iq I a a U F~ M I .. I I - a }-_-}-----_}------}---_--}---_--}------}-----_ ---~- li' rya N 5 I U' r } O a I .7 I~ .y U I N ~o U pp q u ~ O F a W z C7 n O F v z~ ~ ~ F o !T~~ O~G R R o z u~ .. z z m a r~ m ~ u z m a N R a o u Ml z o m b It u a~ z l M '•C M N ~• O M N m a • r D1 O N m a a . A f X 0 a • .} N m '3 ~~ M F F a b H a q b U m .+ M 00 ,T. b U <+ I-I N 'a hl (-I 4 U' a .-I F a F a s p al b a In F >R H: a~ a N 01 rl F a N s a ~ FI H N U M 'Z N I F a N t] q I~ p~ > IG '°< I N I m • b U RR11 F~-.I p{qt q ,] ~ z o x o .+ °a U M a O a O a O O N O a a 0 a O~ a O M m 0 a a 0 a W O a O I _ a q > m [~-aI z F >q~ m .~ p a ~ m [F.. EF. F 14r m .r a m [.I {{..II ~7 H; m [[~.~ ~ R o N H pp H b O A ~ 0 7. ~ F 7. (} O e1 F m '~ o T. 7. 75 Z o o ~ O pp O o 7. 71 F 7. I O o 'Li a k M O O Z F 'F a ~ 'y n1 M q U' O n O U p O .L' I O O M N t7 O I O O O p CI .S , [-I I [-I I (C~ a {ail .1 O '•f G O I 01 IC ('~ b U b a M I a N U I a N a N I [-I m~ M q U I [~I m~ a M a I P N U I .. ~ o f i a b of o~ a~~ b a F a p l o r a o~ I o r a H a a I o b a o~ a I o b a F a a~ o b z o~ a I ~ q a t o .+ w F a a I o A m g m o I u o p F a a I u o s. g m o l u o p H a ac I u o p g m u~ Yl o p F a a I _ _ ei 4 --- } __-.-. } i __-__- } } m a ---- } ----_- } --_-_- ~ N N Al N---- I O f 1 0 ~I I m T I N O ~ + ~ N b N N~ N~ m N N O .•. 1 I I I N F ~ .. b~ .. r .. r ... b a .. a .. r I I I ; O U •. I p ; •} Er O I r~ F O r F O r F O {'! [}-I F 4U4 fl.~l O G 'I U qvq O q~" N O IFS ~ • F Z ~ O ~ a a a A ~ [ m. OC a A ~ [ M~ ~ A ~ [ ar ~a a A ~ [ aI C ~ ~ a IK p~ l a U0G a a H .•'7J70 I C ~~" .. .. ~ ~ ~. i D .. .. ~ ~ .. i b .. .. ~ p .. I p .. .. ~"'y q ... i p .. ..~ F _ H q q U I O U g O F I O U g O H I O U g O F I O U g O a O U g O F v~ 0 0 0 0 qa' v I 0 0 0 0 F V I I a F H U q I a F M U q I a F H U q I a F M U m I a F `+ U q I a F M U m ~ a F ~+ U q a o , J a N r~ p q 3 Cam I~yC ~/yl a O ~ a M a M a H V ~ [., r r r r r r ~ r r ~ m m m m h K a K Pm. F a ~ a ~ a a ~ tbw r N r V1 r r r i ~pyp r r r F F r r ' r O r r r y i M i W r W r ~ U r ~ z i S4 r ~ u u r r r _- , O r }-+-+------y---- + . - r 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 x 0 0 0 0 x 0 0 0 0 x 0 0 0 0 r O O N N O O O O O 0 0 0 0 r 0 O O 0 0 N N m m 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 A q p ui o ui n o n .+ o o .~ rn o rn yr a o 0 r r i r r O a N 1!1 b N N N ~ ..., N ~ N N r'1 en A T r r r r r F ~ i r r r r r ~ r m o r r r r ~ r U r i r r r ~ ~ r r i r r _ ~ _ _ ' _ ~ r o 0 0 0 o 0 o r o 0 0 o r o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o r o 0 0 o r o 0 0 0 r o 0 0 o o r o o r o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 O O p . . . . . N U1 O N N Y1 I(1 O O 01 O b Ifl O O N N N N N N H N N YI •! N m m O ~ O N 1 1 I r I 1 r r 1 1 1 1 1 r r ~ _~~~~~ r m x 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 x 0 0 0 0 x 0 0 0 0 x 0 0 0 0 r 0 0 N .-1 r O O m m .7. O O O O O O O~ O n n Q N O O O O O O N Ifl O O O M O . . . . F r o o ~ ar u~ u~ o o rn ~ m R O N N M ~~ ~ b q U O O o N 1 1 1 1 r 1 ~ . , , , , , 1 1 1 1 4 • _ } _~_~__ } ______ } ______ } _~__~_ } ___~__ } ~___~~ } _~~_~~ y x 0 0 0 0 x 0 0 0 0 x 0 0 0 0 x 0 0 0 0 x 0 0 0 0 r 0 0~ M x 0 0 0 0 M M O O O a ~ 0 0 o ' m n n m N ~ ~ N r 1 1 r 1 1 ~ ~ , r I i r r 1 I r 1 i i _ } ._-_ y _.-_ } __..__ } .__.-_ } _.-.__ } ___.__ } -.__-. } r o 0 0 o r o 0 0 o r o 0 0 o r o 0 0 o r o 0 0 o r o 0 0 o r o 0 0 0 0 0 q O O a N N N O U m ~ ~ m N N N M 01 1 1 I 1 I 1 O a N `B O r r r r 1 r ~ m C~ N 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 o ~. r 1 1 r 1 1 ~ r 1 1 py' O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ri r•1 ~ O O O O N r1i ~~., n a z.. ~ ~ a .pC f+ q L GyA q N N O H H w ~ r r r ~ m N r r r r r r r r m ~ n . . . . . . . . r U r o 0 0 o r o 0 0 o r o 0 0 o r o 0 0 o r o 0 0 o r o o b b r o 0 0 0 ooo~a a r oo.n n q T O O O O N 1 b H N N M q q N r 1 1 r 1 1 ~ , 1 1 1 r 1 1 1 r r y - } - } -___.- } _--. } --._- } .--._- y -.___- } .._..- } ._.--. } x 0 0 0 0 x 0 0 0 0 x 0 0 0 0 x 0 0 0 0 x 0 0 0 0 r O O N N x 0 0 0 0 x 0 0 0 0 r 0 0 0 x 0 0 0 0 r 0 O O x 0 0 0 0 r 0 0 r~ 1 0 0 0 0 r z z g r o 0 0 0 ~ o 0 o r o 0 0 o r o 0 o r o 0 0 o r o o n n r o 0 0 0 r O ti a Y1 0 0 Ilf i N O N x 0 0 0 0 r 0 O O r T 0 0 T x 0 0 .r ri r N Iff N Y1 r N M r N N b A r~ N b r N b N 1!1 r YI N O r N N O n r A ei b m ~ Pf ~" ~ 'y a N N ei N N 1.1 '! ~ N N N N r r r~Jr r r r 1 I r r r ~ a . ' ~ ---- r o 0 0 o r o 0 0 0-- r o 0 0 0-- r o 0 0 o r o 0 o e m m DO o 0 oou+uf 0 0 0 o N N o z ' ~„~ ry N N O ~ PI N N n n a r r r o 0 0 o r o 0 0 o r o 0 0 o r o 0 0 o r o 0 0 o r o 0 0 o r o 0 0 0 r o 0 0 0 o 0 o r o 0 0 o r o 0 o r o 0 0 o r o 0 0 o r o 0 0 0 (~ r o 0 0 0 . o 0 o r o 0 0 0 . o 0 o r o 0 0 o r o 0 0 o r o 0 0 0 b r q . . . N . . N . . 1.1 Vr . . . 1.1 ~ . . . . •! N . . . . m q . . . . N PI T r F r N 0 0 Y1 0 0 r N O b 0 0 x 0 0 0 0 0 0 r 0 O O O O x 0 0 0 0 0 0 r n O O m O~ T r Yf N m b O O l F r N N m 01 O O r~ N O O r rn rn m b 0 0 1 u1 rn 0 0 0 1 w N O 0 0 0 1 .} Vr O N N T Al n 0 0 N r~ m N N N N N N .-1 N N N N M N N ~ m N N AI M N e'1 ~ N N N N ~ M O n F V o N o N N o N O 'o o '~ o "~ '~ N m N .y N .v ./ r•1 N N O .•1 N .-1 '/ N \ r m ~ ~ , Fpqr o ; 173zF ~ ea3z ~ m3zF ~ oiszF ~ eaaoog ~i ~ psoo~~ ~ m~oORU ~ •~oo~~i •~o~~~i •~oo~~i •~oo~~i . r w a u F m r a a u F m. r a a u F m r a a u F m r a a u F m r a a u F m raauF m }------}------+ .. y - + - - - -- - } - - - - - - } - --- - - > C z a z ~~ R ~ (q a ' z o u ~ owma ~ a u ma~j Cma i °a F F i~ ro m~ ~ o n e ~ O T. 4 r 0 r aUm rra mm[-~ a UaaNz oOFo4 U.+vMz r >Z°uvMz r azbaM 7. .+ x • F o N u ~ a • F U u~ w x o w •a o u -.~ m 76 0 F+ s o ~ m b s o r F F a a F N r m a p m m 7. w r m b ~ q~ ~ N r a ~'1 m m N N r a M . ate m bw a w p m o m ms nM rn{. r gmFFa m moa r H a m u F u r a ar~i a ~i ~ oNFp~!U aaa ~'i maFUm~i a~ .+mmR ~ r .+ya.e u ~.+ p u .+mr~ a aF p z op F a p w ua ~o1E~~ra uolE p7m o~~oa o 'a o aoa oo a o0 oa m m m m m u1 m .t m u1 u1 F /. m~ F e F m m ~ F F a m ~ F w m O N R Q] V! O N U O 'y' (q O N ei m vl O M m m 0 m a 0 T. ~ p z a s (y+ O 3f b 'E O q PI ~ O U p1 r U 3 r M 7i 3 r O~ M~ 7. z F u, H b H F O U z b N w U' V W rji. ?. s o a p Z~ o~ n .t o~ o o Cl O R m p ~ r a ~w ti M ['1 O r 1•r i ~ po .y a s r 0 .~ a N . F n U r F n a r 0 .+ ~ O r ~ O b a pr F~~ O b a p1 N~ r .C n a 0 2 m n p~ F> a r a b a O m PI ' A b a O G7 m r 'a m a O td p ~ m a r r al o W .t m RI ~ m o a m b Rl r U o a F a a r U o I4 m O U ~ M o M F a GG ~ a o 0. F a a r w o 0. F a a r r n n o--- i w n n---# m~ r+ r N r~~ n r .r ~ n--- ~ q A r q 01 ~ .. r A N r ri N r n yr r n r. r N b n b b M b of w w N F b N n ~+ b r4 n .-. n ~! .•~ n v~ ~ b '1 b ^~ b n .+ 1 0 n o U m ~ o ro F o N F o E o F o m ~w F o N o N M r N U Vr N U O U Ifl U ~ U b ei n .1 m a ~ ~ r - r~ .+ - r~ .r .. .} - .y o F ~ r 0 r [ m. K m ~ F m. C m ~ H m m ~ [ m. H m ~ E m+ (~. m~ (+ ~ (.. y a H OO r a i D - .. ~y' R .. ~ D .. .. ~ R .. ~ a .. .. ~ R .. i p .. .. Z, R •• ~ P - - 7. R i ? .. .. ~ FA, .. ~ p .. .. r~ R .. q q U r O U g O F ~ O V g O F r O U g O F r O U g O F r O U g O F r O U q F r O U O F r ~ a F N u b r a F M U m r a F w U N r a F H U m r a F N U m ~ a F M m m r a F M m m N `fie" 3 2 O ~ O V a [MFI . U mJ a a F z I u 0 o m a T q ~ U F ~ a 7~ W .+ ri !a$ F a .ri .ri RI O U I i i i i O o .~ .a 0 0 N O O O N ~ ~ O O N 1 I I I I I m 0 0 0 0 z o 0 O r1 0 0 M O I N h O I.1 I.1 O O O N I I 1 I ~ t } 4 - } __-___ } __.._- } __-.._ } -____- O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 O W O O O O Mµ' 01 ri V• YI O q N ~I T N 1 I ~ 1 I I I D 0 0 0 A A N I O I ~ m N I 01 N I H I OI O I py I N O U• N O I I I I I 1 I I ~ I a m f +. } _...._ } __.___ } __..__ } __._._ aa~r C 0000 7. .I ~ ~m~.II m N O A U ~ F O Y M t~ U ~] T a H a '1 F -- a N I I I I I I z r U I 0 0 0 0 v a r a o1 u A A N I I 1 I I 1 0 0 0 0 ° 0 0 0 z °z ~ ° 0 0 0 O M 0 0 0 0 F S 'I.~m Ir a "~ a 0 0 0 0 .oz Meg a F • I I ~ • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 q o 0 0 ° C7 ~ p N (•I 0 0 0 0 0 0 •iT(i F .-I ~ m u+ 0 0 N n N N M O F O .~ .~I N N r} Iq I W 3 O O~ q I ~ I I a a U F CV7 r 0 e M X F r z a ~ o F F CO FI i a O i r I a~ ~ ~ ar ~i I I o w o G I I U i O o Io ,'E ~I a I K~ Cm7 a o M n F 7. o I o ~ ~a.a°r,o ,7 I u~ a u I I I I vi ~ ~ oOGOh.Fa~°a I ~ o N I M•'m ~i I r.i r .. Iq O N M [~I •i 01 F ~ O W p~ I `{ O •• p U a O U p •C F v i I I a F M m m I I I +-- + - - } - - y _ _ _ _ - 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I ~ I • I i i I I I I I a N V ~ r ~ o o ~ b o o b P1 W o o n U F M ~ n N b O a N b r r N b ry ry m ~ ~ w U ~ ., ~ o o .r ,~ o m o o m m ry o 0 0 0 0 0 b w N ry b rl O w w N O O m O ry ry N ry ~ N ~ .a ~ o r M .y o ?. m o ~ wi m O r1 O O N N O M O F ~ b w b O b '~~(11 O Om b N m O O H ry M m O O ry ry ry ry ry N w m ry 0 b O m N N N m O i m ~ r n m w n r ry w r n~ w r H w N ry N N • • - i - • - i ~ r~ b N w r 0 .i w w ry N w w r O O q w ry ~ N b N O H O m b ry ~ rf m w b N b O b N N w O 14 N ry ry ry ((~~ ry F O -- m am • •-•-•-----! !~ a oar ~ o~ o ry m o a N ~ O~ ry ry N 0 7i N m N ('t ry b N OCG H O i U w n ,y ~ w F p u ~ r ! r m w v PpG A O 1 w ~; ~~ N N U F `H" ~ p ~ .+ ~ ry .i ry ea a~ m x r ~ i ~ ~ ; O w • i - ! - i - - - - - U n w M ry N o b M w ~ w wl r w~ n~~n w w rl N b r N N b r • w n r w r n n O r w N ry ry ry o n o r o ~ O ~'. O M „ ~ M p m M p w b Pl O r~l f1 b Yr ry .1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - - ~ - i - - - - - i ~ ry ~ O r N m w O N Al ~ O z ~~ ~ 0 0~ M m N 11 ~ b n ~ b r a ~ .+ .+ ry ---+-i-----• M O O N „ O O 1~1 b ~ O N r w H w h o r o '. rl ~ m N N N ~ H O w .y r F U ry W r ry .' o ~ Y ry ry ry O -'-~easzzo' c ~ °`aui°r«z, w ~ ~ ~ ~ w ' O ~ ~ ~ ~ o ppy a O ~ a~ i H ~ F w r ~ •vi ~ ~ ~ ' a Ep~. m p ~ A O p F w .~ ~ U oG ~ m ~ ry i • r ry ((--~~ O U M M [[..~~ : . d' p • F ~ O • . u ur DDD a a• a °u i ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~ ~ G~- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 27, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Public Hearing and Adoption of the Secondary Road System Six Year Construction Plan for Fiscal Year 1996-2002 and the Allocation of Funds for Fiscal Year 1996-1997. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S CLLOMMENTS: / J / // S~ ~v~f 7~ic.~ Elie, lJc.6~;c /,Nnrind5 ~i•°, l~t~~/; GvnS.dsr clnr Cun~,nrnff Y'P~r./rrs~ d J 1 ~j T~ / f ~ f~ Cl, cl c~ T. irdr f"~i (i t P J C ~... T~ o n ~Fo .- ~T ~ C S t'- t .; i; c~C.: ~ /j c c..~ S'J 1 T P:n CO - ~ P s? r P IC.n fc,: FMS [a./ ,f f:. ~ i'/~O ".2 C'C+'y EXECUTIVE SUMMARY• Staff is requesting the Board of Supervisors to adopt the attached Resolution to approve the Secondary Road System Six Year Construction Plan for Fiscal Year 1996-2002 and approve the allocation of funds for Fiscal Year 1996-1997. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: In accordance with Section 33.1-70.01 of the Code of Virginia, as amended, the Board of Supervisors is required to conduct a Public Hearing on the Secondary Road System Six Year Construction Plan to receive public comment. The plan before the County Board of Supervisors was presented to you at a work session on February 13, 1996. At the work session, County staff explained the evaluation process for inclusion of projects in the plan and also reviewed the estimated funding for the next five years and how this year's allocation ($2.7 million) would be distributed among the three funding categories. Staff is now requesting the Board of Supervisors to conduct the Public Hearing and approve one of the following alternatives and impacts. 1 u~ ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: 1) Conduct the Public Hearing and adopt the Resolution approving the Six Year Secondary Road Construction Plan for Fiscal Year 1996-2002 and Allocation of Funds for Fiscal Year 1996-97. 2) Conduct the Public Hearing and defer approval of the Six Year Secondary Road Construction Plan for Fiscal Year 1996-2002 until staff can review (if any) additional comments received at the Public Hearing. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative 1. ITTED BY: ~rio`~d Cove Direct of Engineering & iispec ions APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To ACTION Motion by: VOTE Eddy Harrison Johnson Minnix Nickens No Yes Abs pc: Virginia Department of Transportation 2 ~` AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 1996 RESOLUTION APPROVAL AND ADOPTION OF THE SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM SIX YEAR CONSTRUCTION PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996- 2002 AND APPROVAL OF THE ALLOCATION OF FUNDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996-1997. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on February 27, 1996, to receive comments on the adoption of the Secondary Road System Six Year Construction Plan for Roanoke County for Fiscal Year 1996- 2002; and the adoption of the Funding for Fiscal Year 1996-1997; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors does hereby approve the adoption of the Secondary Road System Six Year Construction Plan for Roanoke County for Fiscal Year 1996-2002 and allocations for Fiscal Year 1996-1997 as set out on the attached Secondary System Construction Program. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution duly attested be forthwith forwarded to the Virginia Department of Transportation Salem Residency Office along with a duly attested copy of the proposed Second Road System Six Year Construction Plan for Roanoke County for Fiscal Year 1996-2002 by the Clerk to the Board. u-~. 1 I 1(f O n N t-1 ei I I+1 O rl b ID OD I 1+1 rl 01 GD O O F i m o o p In m .~i t t F I r al In M o 0 I 1 r In b r ao ao 1 N N N N N N I 1 1 K f/Y V! 4! N N 1 1 ~ li o n o o In a In ri a a o ao p~ I ao ri ~ ao o [~ x ~ F + In m ui In al In O 1 Of N M q 7 N 1 o r b b o N 1 1 N r1 ri ~i rl ri N N N f? VF N y 1 O 1 I N c~ F ~ m m o m N t~ 1 o rl r m b m F °i O 1 .~ b r In v N u i O , j 1 p " ' W 1 0l o rl r/ r of ai ~ ~ 1 w O1 b b .i In p ~ b r aD m b dl 'I a F p I ar N ar k 1 rl rl a ~ I N N 1 ~i 1 O [q H ~ O PO O dl I v1 U U W 1 i b ~ o VI a .~ 1 m n o M .~+ o F I 1 Ih M o a b o VI 1 O 01 Ifl H 7 1+f I $ I I+1 N N V! 1+1 li a0 rl ~ .i N ri G7 1 t? N N N z 1 1 1 1 r b 01 O rl N I 01 01 01 I O I O I O I b [~ GD Of O 'i 71 I 01 01 O1 O1 O O Of 01 O1 O1 O O I ri li ri rl N N 1+/ r 0 M to rl N r'~ M N v m a a m ..7 °; 0 N a a ~o ~ m a F O F 1 1 I 1 ~ ' I I ~ a ~ ~ ~ q 1 Q I 1 1 A 1 1 1 n 1 E I I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 la 1 1 Q 1 1 F 1 1 1 1 I I F 1 1 y uaa ~ z 1 I a ~ 1 ~ 1 Q ti 1 H 1 ~ 1 1 ~ ~ o a I I u ~ ~ I ~ 1 H 1 hl I y I U O 1 W ~ a 1 I F 1 1 Q 1 1 ~ 1 1 1 1 1 v • ~, m '~ r b a N qpz - N z 7' p O R ZO ZO O a O M H 1.1 ,4 H I"I M F I I I r I I I - U 60. d p p b 3 p z I I ' ' 1 1 I ' a Ea., a F F 1 1 a a I r 1 1 m r F ' ' 1 1 1 F ' Q$ 1 N I I 4 1 ~ 7. - 1 ~ 7. -- 1 7. -- 1 7. ~ O 1 F 1 N 1 N ' 6.r N p °u 1 ~z 1 I I F 1 O 1 O 1 O 1 O U r r I m I U 1 U 1 U 1 U r 0 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 ~ pl x I U I I 1 1 1 I 1 r ~ ~ F ~ 1 1 1 ' ' 1 1 RI ~ 1 1 1 ' ' I U r 1 1 r 1 ' ~ 1 1 1 1 I I l o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 0 0 N o 0 o 0 0 ,~ 0 0 O N N O N 1 1 1 r r 1 1 I 1 1 ' I ~ z o 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 0 0 p r-1 0 0 H O • [+ 0 0 0 0 0 O N N O o 1 1 1 1 a N 1 ~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 g q 1 0 0 0 0 O O ~. t` O O O O • • .i N O O b b 01 b b N N N N N q r r 1 1 r 1 r I ' 1 1 1 I 1 1 I r I 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 NI N 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 00 00 1 0 0 00 00 O O b N N O O O O 01 0 0 b b t` r • q T 01 N N N N N ~ O N N r•1 {~ [• O [J m b O O [• [• N y~ 1 1 1 1 1 N m N .i N N I 1 I r 1 I 1 N H T I O r P1 1 N 1 1 ' ' 1 I r 1 1 r 1 O N 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 ' __-__ .- ^. 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Vr yr 1 0 0 0 0 - N ~ O O 0 0 0 0 q q O O z rl 7 (Q q O O O O O O p„y' N O M.C U O O O O O O ~p b O O Z p [i rip 01 ri N N N 1 1 1 , U F `H' ~ a 1 '~ 1 1 1 1 ; ti z n. 1 I 1 1 ' ' U 1 0 0 0 0 I O O N N I O O C t` I O O N N 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 b O O b b 01 O• frl Al O O O O O O O p• r• O O b b vl N m m O O 0 0 0 O O T 01 • • • • • • • O O N O O Vr ~ M M m m N N N q N ~ O b N N b N N r t` a p O M VI A r-1 r-1 M AI N N M b A M A N 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 r 1 1 I I I r r 1 1 r 1 1 0 0 0 0 I O O N N 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 N Vf 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 N N 1 0 0 0 0 O O O 1n M O O O O ~ N ~ N N I.1 O O O r r• O O [9 O O M M m m p r a o o r 1. M n m m N N M M en M r• r a al r• r• a s o m o t• r 0 o n r e a N m N a s 1 rFi ~ a ~ ~ .+ N ~ q a r I I ' ~ ~ ~ 1 1 1 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - l o 0 0 0 o N N o 0 o In N r o 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 00 i N ~ o o n r ~ o o m m i o o b b 1 0 0 0 0 i o 0 0 0 0 p p 1 o n b .i l o o b l o o .~+ .a l o 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 ~ o 0 0 ~~ M I O m N N r O O b b r 0 N b ei I N O N O 1 0 0 P L` N N O rj ~ e~1 m m m N O If1 ~ l~ N Vr ? t~ I• m !~f 10(1 N Obl T ~ N N M .i a m a N .a .a n v1 .+ n W .i N N ed 1 I r r I 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 I O O N N 1 0 0 0 0 O O 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 M m I q 0 0 r 0 N O N 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 b b 1 0 0 i• [~ r 01 1 0 O O r q O O g 0 1 0 m O m A 1 0 0 0 0 q I O N N O 01 g 1 N 0 0 Ifl A 01 1 0 N b m N 01 r N O N 01 01 q ;~ F M N O• O 1 N m b N 01 01 N O O N 01 01 I f• N N E 01 01 1 r t` M [• T 01 1 O O b 01 1 r O r• 01 q ~ 1 H 0 O O N N 1 N a b N N N I rt N b a1 rl N N p .i H N MI .-1 ei 1 N m m N rl ei N N N N r F U N rl b b N N m 01 rl N p N O O N T N Vr O O n b N N O O • O O O N r•I N O O O O ~ 1 a ~ 1 1 p 1 p I 0 W 3 'L F ~ ~ x$ 7. F~~ i h1 3 ~ 0~ ~ i N S '!. F qR G' p7 3 0 0 U' C7 3 0 0 j u ~ m 3 0 0 r! U ~ 1 1 a a U F~ ea l a a6 O F W a a U F w 1 a a U F 07 UM + a a U F pl p7 + a a U F yW_ 67 + a a U F GW7_ x i .. I a } _ _ _ + + - } _ - _ _ - - } - - - _ - - - _ - - - - I - _ ~ - - _ _ - - K - - - - - - I - - - - - pu 1. n a ,~ _ ~ ,.~ •~ .a 1• a .a b .~ b n b ea ~y Z uoi SG m F K 1n H O pp77 In F v1 F H F K (~ U H 7.0 R U a H~ O Pp'. U a U~ O ~ U a ~ ~ U a~ r1.' o bN a cri U M x r'fi b '~ H ~ q 7, H N x F H rl .~ H C1 m N ~ Oj ~ H L1 m N i s a U' x O N O O F N r• F. CL m o m o ~+ O N R U KO N a H Z q a N .a a N U N a U ~ N D r'1 ~ rC N m~ p a H O~ p a H W ~G pl N Io p O 1 H roi p oC o ~E ~ o~ .~ o£ b o a o E a a o~ ~ 7. 1 U a 1 3 1~ °m N 'a ° F ~ m o N o H U m m m o F N m m H 1 m m~ U F O pl x pp N 1 g O .i xx N O O F ppt~~ N 1 M O N N p~ N 1 H 0 v1 U {'i'I rFi r M 0 U 1 H 1 F F F 'b i p 1 F F '~!, i M 1 O F 7. i z 1 F F 7. e• m ~ z I q i~ o i K~ ~I a a G O 1 a m o a C1 O b o 00 U' O I O o o a U' O 1 a .+ 0 7, C7 O 1 a .~ o~ p a i u 1 a N u I a o u 1 a o a s °; ~ o ~ 1 0°o ezo~" ~ eaaloao~" 1 looio~o-~ 1 orao~w 1 obao~m 1 obao~F~ ~ m a 1 r um ~ ~oaFao~ 1 NoaFa~a ~ cnoaFa 1 uoa,Faa 1 xoo-.Faa r xoa mo 1 0 0 M 1 M O 01 1 m r m--- } b O F--- I O W b 1 rl a N N N~ ,.1 1 0 o n l o o n 1 N U i Iq 1 o a `. 1 b n~ 0 1n H o ~ o c• e F a o v M F N o `o° ~' v1 0 .. 1 m O l o N 1 v U "E~? n r~ m F O 1 O H ~ ~~.1 OC ~r [•. ~r a ~ C7 OG C0 b ~ O 1 a i 0 U g F F v 1 p U q O F v O U g O F V 1 0 U q O F I O U g O H 1 0 U g O F I O U g O F q q U I I a F M N N I a F H U N 1 a F H U N 1 a F M U N I a F H U N 1 a F H U N I a F H U N (~ N (a ~~~^y.{'111 z z z z 3 o s o ~ o O nz O E5 IO.I I N R H PG H Wi H I I"I I u .C p p b ~ D ~ p a s a s I I I ' I I I ' ~ OL F 0. F a 0.' OG 0. H F F I I I I I I I I I I I O I F ' qy N ~ py y ; y I y I ; p z ~ W z ~ ~ z I W z I W z g z I z I I ~hhybby.. I O MO -- I O I I O I O I O I O I U I U I U I U I U I U I U _ _ - _ _ _ - _ - - - - _ _ + _ _ - - _ _ + 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 I O O N N 1 0 0 0 0 N N D7 M y y H ~ N N I I I I I I I~ I I I I I ~ ~ I I U I I I I I I I I I 1 I - - - - - _ - _ _ _ _ - I I _ _ + _ - + _ _ _ _ _ _ + _ _ _ _ _ _ + _ _ _ _ + _ - i ± - ± - + ---- ---- I o 0 0 0 I o 0 0 o I o 0 0 o I o 0 0 o I o 0 0 o I o 0 0 o I o 0 0 0 0 0 N r r o 0 o b b ~ o a a Io H y y 0 0 N I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 _ _ I _ - } _ - _ - } _ _ _ _ _ - + _ _ _ _ _ - a + + - i - - - - } _ _ - - - } - _ _ _ - _ + - - I y 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 00 00 1 0 0 00 00 O p O O O .~ H O o 0 0 0 IE! o u~i Iii e a U o O o 1.7 N I ~K] I I I I 1 I I I I I I I __ I I I I - _ I i + _ _ _ - _ } _ _ _ - } _ _ _ _ + - _ _ _ _ j 4 + _ + _ _ - _ + _ _ _ _ - - _ _ - l o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 o I o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 o I o 0 00 0o I o o~ a '°° o0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o i !0~~ o m o ~ ~ v°i ui W q Irl q q q ~I q H I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I i + 4 + ~ 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 O O O O 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 00 00 I O g N YN 1 0 0 0 0 O O O O q O O O O O O O O b r VI O O I!~~ ~ y y ei I-I 0 0 b M O 0 0 O V m O O ei ri y I!1 O O I(1 ~ I•i y N y q N H rl N 'I y N M q 1 1 I I I I O 14 •i I 'y" 0 1 I 1 I I I M I N I I I I I I I I I F ~ .-. I I I __ I I _ I +_-_--_ ± N .i O m -+ 0 0 0 0 y Pi y + + _ ; _ _ _ _ + _ _ _ _ _ _ i _ _ _ ~ _ ; _ _ - _ _ _ ~ p, p~ 0 0 0 o I o 0 0 0 D o n o 0 0 o I o 0 0 0 y IS O O O O p VI O O I O O O I N O N I O O z 'I y I~ I m I O O O O HI Iyl O O I O O O I m M m I O O 31 [[rr O O y N b b Ifl If1 I b O ~O I O l~1 H1 1 O O E H O A U ~ (~ F q +l M r ,r .•~ n n q q .+ .+ 0 0 0 a a Ill y Ti D Q O q N N N N H VI N q I I I I I I u [al ~ ~ a I H I I I I I I ' tmii z r I I I I I I ' ' __ O q + + - + - - - - - - ± o 0 0 0 - - * - - - - - - * - - - - - - + - - - - - - + - - - - + - - - - - - U I o o n I o 0 0 o I o 0 0 0 ~ o0 0 0 00 ~~ o o~ I o 0 0 0 I a o a o 0 0 a r w o w o 0 0 0 0 o a w H I o 0 o y In o o ,~ N a a b m q r • `M N N q r/ N q N 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I _ _ f I O M O l•1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 M M 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 00 p V~ O p O O O VI m 0 0 0 I O O O 1 0 0 0 0 ~ x z 0.~ v o a o 0 o n o 0 o I o 0 o I o 0 0 o i o 0 0 I O H O O O Ill Ill O N H Ill H b I O O O 1 0 0 0 0 , O O H e H m O m n m y m H Ill b N M Ill Ill O y 0 y O Yl F e O N y ~-I ~..I N N M b Ill y N N I 'EWpi I I 1 I I H d I I I I I N m I q p7 I I I I I ' ; ~ a I I I I I I I _ _ I I _ ' ' I -- ---- *------*------+------ I o N o r l o 0 0 o I o o r r I o 0 0 0 ~ o0 0 0 00 l o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 I y O ul 1 0 0 O I O Yf y I O O O y Ill 0 0 O O b b O O O O IOj lZj N q ~ O O „ ~ ~•1 I.1 O N N N ~Mj q '1 r1 '1 Vf n N a I~jy4 I I I I I ' I o 0 0 o I o 0 0 o I o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 o I o 0 0 o I o 0 0 o I o 0 0 0 I o 0 0 0 I o 0 0 o I o 0 o I o 0 0 o I o 0 o I o 0 0 o I o 0 0 I q 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 O O m q I O O O O~ N I O O O~ N b I p7 ~ m q q I F I O O O O g q I O N Ifl O q q I O Ill Ill q q I O y H b g q I y O y g q 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 O O O O F I y 0 0 YI I '/ N r O q I N O q I N 'I Ill m q q I Y n r g q I ill b N 0 0 0 l y O YI O O ~ I~ y 'I y b ei H H N H N N H N N N N N N I./ y Yl N N N N N N \ I M O O m N I~l v N v N N y V O N O O O o N O N. O O N O e1 \ I W ~ I I I o I W$ 7. F q R7 3 'F F q I pi 3 7. F q I C0 $ z F q l yl $ 'A F q~ p7 3 7» F ~ 07 3 O O U •\0 0 U \O O qR U \0 0 U I \0 0 U I \0 0 U \0 0 I I a aG O F 61 Iq I W M' O F p7 Iq I W fr U F~ Rl + W OG O F 67 pl ~ a a U F m pl ; M GG O F pl m+ W P: O F 90 M .. I m a m n n rv U M q N~ 1' N H p v yt-I f~ b d q v S to w m `tr ~ o .7 0.' o~ ~y i 0 0 61 F O~ I O r W IO-t o Di N ~ e h % r µ0. y W H q 10. y F m Rl I 0.' b F M y F F pp7 y p R i t i R U c6 y', £ i z~ pG O N V~ z o] K F~ i p7 U OG GG O i> PI 0.' m o09 u g V~ O ~ F0.' r1 I F~ I O N N m>>M>>> I H VI y F~ I H V y y I H Y1 pI W F I,n7 I H Ifl D7 ~ ~ 'y b H I q ~ b a t7 OG n$ a v 0 R m F 1G li m H a q ~C Q N a .+ q F .t y s aG H IZ ~ N Ill Ri N y P U N % p q N y q pal ~ VI u o LWp~ h1 {y HZ H D7 C. H H O H D7 > C' m F PF' o pp'~ a m R~ O pl U .i a ~.' H o W D o .HE ~ Ip~;i RW ~ o ~ F p7 0 .'E 'R. ~ ~ a aoo e O [. p~ F m a C7 HH O o N IC F I m o Iq y rl m y u R o o ~' cm9 bL ~ o~ Z F T. ~ o o~ CyY IG AyG ~ Cy0 ~ a' o .~I F x ~ ,'6' W o N Uµ' W K o 0 o O~ 1 I • q ~ y~ q I ~qf m O a FC11 ~ I F O O W' (M F I F O O rl M r O O pC q I qy r O G] q M I ~j H N H HUyI O I > H N O g q ppf~l IC yy pp F I u •• •• w H I fK m .• p; H C7 ~ U b 0: O M pl I U b C H fL' o: .~I O I I O b OG O D7 I O b oG Wa > H I O u t4 C0 IS m oG O W ~: p7 1K F 0.' OG \ ~ 0.' I I g o PI F rl U I .7 o W ~i O .7 I .7 0 0. cL 3 I .+ p. F R RI I> .~+ h. m GJ U I ,'~ .-I 0. F .7 oG 1 ~y .I 0. m Pl U - ------ I r .-I In I N n I N r N I m VI VI I O M Ifl --- I O N y I r N l~l b rl I \ .. I I N a r I r b ei r N m a y .•. b b y ,,,, ,., .. I b .. I b a ~ I b VI ~ r b N F I b 'I r N y N q O U •• I m I O N M F I O b I O I"I T N F m N p ti ~' m q I IUID~ b I ~i r I ~~i n .•I CJ L N ~ ~ a C~-7I IZ P7 ~ W i [6+7 b I[+#F• '` .. ~ I v r ~ ~ .~Oa r ~ F a H o ~ p .. .. ~ a .. ~ .. .. ~ ~ .. ~ ^ .. z R .. ~ p .. .. ~ O ... [T,-.I q q U I O U g O F I O V g O F I O U g O F I O U g 0 oG I~ V g 0 OOG ... ~ O U q~ F v~ O U g O F V I I 0.' F M U y I 0.' F H U y I a F H U y I 0.' F H U Q1 I 0.' F H U Pl OG F H V y 0.' F H U y N 0 b m O I I 1 ~~~ N $ 0 ZO ~ ~ p ~ O q p U a F ~ H a H ~ F a H 4Z F U K U U 67 b a p ~ a p D1 I I I I I 1 , I a s a s a F a F a s a s a I I I I l ~ F ~ F , I I I q F ' o F 1 q ' Q , N ~ Q 1 IgypIy pztizti ~qzjz I pzpz N I 6. U I w O 6 I I ~ U I U I 1 I I O I U 1 i a U I M z i R U __ 1 F z __ I 6• I I o 0 0 o I o 0 0 o I o o n r I o 0 0 0 l o o n y l o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 ,A N b b O O 0 0 0 ~ ~ N N Irl l+l 0 0 O O O F~ ~~ r ~ o 0 0 0 0 O a b o o ~ .~ .~ om .a F n r N N N o I I I I I I ~ PI O .a N I U I I I I I 1 i I I I I I I I 1 + - ~ - + + + I O O Ol Ol I O O O O I O O q T 1 0 0 0 0 I O O m m I O O O O I O O O O ~. r O O n n O O 'I rl O O O O O N O O O O N N O O h l~ O O O O O p . . . . . . . . . of N N N N N N O O b b O O N O N N N N N N N Ill N 1.1 m N N N T b O N N N N m O N I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 z I O O O O I O O O O 1 0 0 0 0 I O l~ N N I 0 0 0 0 I O O O O O O O O O O O O N r-1 b I O O O I O O O rl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a1 a o 0 0 0 0 H O F N N Ill N O O O O rl 111 [~ N N O N 111 q' O N N T N O O Ill N N N I~ 1~ r'1 T l~l /~1 U O ei '1 N N N 1~ A O o ,.7 N I ,Aji 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 + + - i + _ _ + _ _ - . - - i O O O O i _ _ _ _ + _ - _ _ - _ + _ _ _ _ - - + O O O O 1 0 0 0 0 I O b p 0 I N M O m I O O O O 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O ~ b N O O m 111 O O O O O O O m N O O N W O O O O . . . . . . . a' O O O O m O 01 N O l~l m m O O Mq~ 01 O O N N m b ~i N m l~ <I ~' 01 N N T N ~ OI ~•/ I 1 1 1 1 1 I I , I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I O OI rl O I O O O O I rl w O N 1 0 0 0 0 I N O O N 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 r N o 0 0 o m .a ~ 0 0 0 .+ .+ a o m o 0 0 o wl n o 0 o e~ v I~ OI N ~ r N O O 0 0 O r-I N O O O b O [U! m N N YI ~-1 N 10 O V~ V~ V' '1 N rl ~-I N T H N N N N l•/ N N H A 1 1 1 1 1 I I I O a N O 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 V' N I I I I 1 I I I -- --- - o .-. I 1 , 1 I I 1 1 a N + i - + - - - - + - - - - - - ~ ~ O O A - ± O O O O + - - - - - - ± O O O O - ± O O O O + a pfi OI 'i O O O O O O O O O O K (~ 1~ N O O O r~l ~ N y [M[-Il m O 01 O O O b H O A U ~ 1~ n O O O A A F Q l~ D7 [~ N N N V~ VI VI a Cal H a N N N y ~- a I I 1 I I I I I i 1 I I 1 1 1 l 1 1 I O a + i _ + ___--. + ___- +.-__ + __--__ + -__- + -_._ + __-_-. + U l N O O N 1 0 0 0 0 I O O O O 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 q N 01 l~ T q Ol . . N N N r n a N 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 I o 0 0 0 l 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 . o 0 0 l o 0 0 0 l 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 ~ z z p~ o 0 0 0 l 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 I o 0 0 I o 0 0 0 l 0 0 0 I o 0 0 0 I O H a l o 0 0 o i o 0 0 ~ o 0 0 o i o 0 o i o 0 0 0 ~ In In o 0 0 0 0 I H M I O O N I N O N I N O N O I yl b O I O O O O I n r N I O N O N H d N N N [~ N N 1'1 Ill N O N l•1 N M 1+1 01 N M ei N m N Q~ a ei N I N N ; N N i I I l I I 1 I~ I I 1 1 I I - I I I 1 I I I I I O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o z M HH a f I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I l l o 0 0 o I o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t o 0 0 l o 0 0 0 t o 0 0 l o 0 0 0 l 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 ~ q o 0 0 o I o 0 o I o 0 0 o I o 0 o I o 0 0 o I o 0 o I o 0 0 0 W . '1 N ri N N NI N 1.1 NO O HI N 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 O O O O 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 I O 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 I N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F O N O N O O I N O N O O I N O N 0 0 0 1 V~ b 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 l~ r N O O I O N O N O O N I N 'I N !~ N N N N N N N N O N N N M N N I M I•'1 T N N N M N N I N N m •i N N H O r` • F U C N V' N N N m N N N N m m N N N N N N O N O N O rl O N O l~1 O r1 N O I~ I I 1 I a$ .'L F qq 1 OA 3 SG F pp pp I W 3 7. F Qp p 1 67 3 Y.. F g I W 3 7. q A I hl 3 SG F pg p l a 3 0 0 U I I 1 BOO ~U I ~00KU I X00 R U I X00 ~B I ~O ~KU I X00 a~ U 1 I I a a U F W I a a U F W 1 a a U F CCIX9991 D7 I a a U F D7 I a a U F 0C a7 I a a U F N 61 1 a a U F~ Iq 1 I 1 b I p trl C~ o z 1~ N U I O m r W N H b U '1 H rr~~ zz~~ ~ U a F a 'd C7 N ~ O F v W ppuu I~ F o 0~9 o z u e H z z a a r ~a w p u z w a N o~ ~ o u H z ~O w ~ u a~ z H ,Tx, H N k'i 0 M N {q a • 1~ 01 O N W a rl w ~E p a . N N~ ~3 ~ p M F F a H a N U m N M p7 ~", b N M H N III I aCy~yl I a `r+F o1F a mapq ba I> spa? l a Na E. a Nina I H FN~ i i OHr' W I N I F a N Up I N I .H'F. > U I R I F F N D I Iwt I~ > !G l a u U f a M I~,~ ,~ .+ Up pq [. p1 I.~ U R I F F b H I F > R m O H a a ai a > m a T. o f p1 0 .i O .H7 R m a a o F .1 ~ .. O a ra m a a o F oo m a O K [-I O [~.I H pm7 N O N a H O [~..I [F.. N R~•1 O O ~~~-`]1 W ,4, o (1 F IC z O O [-I ~~ H O O 'j.~ ~ z A ~ 1 7i F Ti ~ I ~ ~J pp 7i 1 ~i T. 7. ZI 1 U U' qp O I R Ti I'I 1 1 Ti ~! I H !•1 H N [7 O n O p Ll 7E I O O H H~ O l O O O p C1 R' F m H H UI O' F m H p Ll Rl ~ 7.1 ~ O> UI O I 1 p b U I b a M I a N u 1 a N H FI m •• U FI m a H W P N •• U I ~ o I 1 .7 b a o~ w 1~ b a F a a l o r a o~ I U r a~ a w 1 o b a U~ W c b a F a a 1 o b a O~ 1 N a«___+ o .+ a F a a~ o .+ a N w o{ u o a F as ~ u o a N a o+ u o w F a a+ u o a N oo u~ lc o a F a ~a ~ - - - - - - I m 01 - - - - I m q - _ - - 1 N m - - - - I - - - - - - I M N - - - - 1 O V• N N O m b N b N N m N m N m N N m I 1 I F b N .. b N .•. [~ I.1 .. n M .. b 01 .•. b 01 .-. C r F ~• 1 1 1 [-I [-I F 1 U •• I M I N b I N b O h O l~ O O U U H 71 ; [-I U O U O U ~•1 U ~-I U N N F ~ I o ~ m ~am~ w ~da~ ou ~a ~ ~ w ~aa~ w ~a ~' m ~wa~ ~ w ~aa`~ A U I O U g O F i 0 U g O F I O U p O F O U G O a I O U g O F I O U p O a l O u g O F I I a F H U N I a F H U N I a F H U N I a F M U RI I a F H U N I a F H U a0 I a F M U N I a b ~~„ a m ~ ~ ~ o a 3 o t o 3 0 u ~ a~ a u a~ a a a a a F a F a F I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 I O O O O I O O O O I O O O O I O O N N O O O 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 O O O O N N I w w O O O 1 0 O O 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 O O CI q V F !,a2;1 w In o In r o r .+ o o .i In o In a w o 0 O a .+ In b N N In In o ry m ~~ q u1 F~ N N N N m U I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 o I o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 l o o t o o I o o t o o l o 0 0 0 0 0 N o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N YI O N N VI q O O q O b Ifl O O N N N H r1 H d H N Ifl w N m m O H O N I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I N 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 I O O O O I O O O O 1 0 0 0 0 I O O ei N I O O m m 7. 0 0 0 0 0 o v a o r r O 'I O O O O O O Ill N O O O H O F O O P dl Ill Y1 O O Ill VI q lC O N N I~l I~l rl I'~ I.1 10 q C1 O O O a N I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 o I o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 o I o o a w l o 0 0 0 0 0 o a s o 0 0 m e v In In r r q •!I q N I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 O O q O O q N ~ ~ Ill O m I~l N q N N N H q o w .+ o O I I I I I I I I I I C1 N F I I I I I I I I I I m a m + + - } - - _ - } _ _ - - } - - - - - - } - _ _ - - - } - - _ - _ _ } - - - - - - } - _ - - _ - } N a cG o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o Ir .i o 0 0 0 m R r r z .+ ~ F~. m ~, I~ {K H O l7 C~ ~ q q K F Q Y M r N N U '] q OOL H I a I rl U F ~ I a I I I I I I w q I I I I I I I I I I w z r __ u I o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 o I o 0 0 o I o 0 0 0 l o o b b l o 0 0 0 l0 0 o q q r o o In q q N O O O O b N .i .i In q q H I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 I O O N N 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 O O I O O O O 1 0 O O I O O O O T O O T VI 1 0 0 0 0 ~~ V g l o 0 0 0 t o 0 0 l o 0 0 0 t o 0 o I o 0 0 0 l o o r r l o 0 0 0 I O M a I N O O m I N O N I O O O O 1 0 O O I g O O q 1 0 0 H N I h m I H (((Z(Z~~~7 H I N N N q I q N b I Ifl N h N I N Y1 O I N Y1 O r I N N b m nl r M D OI N N N N N M VI Y N N A N N I PIII I I I I I I I I I (] w I I I I I 1 I I Pi I I I 1 1 I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I l o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 0 o m m l o 0 0 0 m O O O o I(1 Yf P C1 O O O O N N o z H H N N m O m r1 ~j (~ N N I'1 I.1 r a I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 I O O O O 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 O O 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 O O 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 ((~~ 1 0 0 0 0 I O O O 1 0 0 0 0 I O O O 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 I O O O O ID w . N I~1 N N wl VI . M P VI 1l1 . m q . N M q I F Ill O O Yl O O I N O N O O 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 I g 0 0 Ifl q q I N U1 YI Y1 0 0 F I N N u1 g 0 0 I C N b 0 0 I N Y1 N N O O I In N 0 0 0 1 Ill Ill O O O O I r1 al 0 ul q q w1 r 0 0 r1 I~ m N N N N N N ri N N N N M N N a Ill N N M M H N N N N N ~ H O r F U O N O N N O N O b O N O N N N w N ei e/ H ri N N N O N H N H rl \ w N o I w 3 z F q op I w$ z F op I w 3 7. F pq qq w 3 7. F q pp I w 3 z F^q gq I w~ z F ^ GG I w~ 0 0 U •~ 0 0 R U ~ O O~ U ~ O O r( U ~ O O Ii U X 0 0 ri U X 0 0 R U ~ I I I I I I I I a a U F w I p77 I I6g7 66667777 NN I .. I I a a U F w I a a U F w I a a U F w r a a U F w I a a U F w I a a U F w I } - - - } - - - - - - } - - - - - - } - - - - - - } - - - - - - } - - - - - - } - - - - - - * - - - - - - y ~ z wap7 (p7 z (p~ m m (p] ~s (q~ a p ~ p t4 4 ~ !G K It N ~ N .y K w a ~ I¢ O w i 0 w ~ 0 w w ~ O nl R o o r a ~ O Zi pI I z I O p7 l a w l a F F l a ul F In r p7 N o a I a OI H R I O I a U w n {4 m w a U a a H z m F o U .l b H ,7.1 I> ~, b b z T. b a H ,Y, I I H mm F O N D l a F U U I k ,'~ O I w a O U .~ m ,S,' O I H ~ O I w - Io ,'$ O qp I F F a F N I w a c I w w 7. H I w b N .+ M I a I+1 w w N H I a M 6E I a U' ~~ b w a k~ w o F~ w m s tr7 i R rl w vl F+ I g m F F q F I w w O q ~+ ~ IKC I H 'y N U F U OG w U a U I O N F w N U a a a U a F U N O a W I 4 I H V7 a It U I H M p U I H w a a F a z o p A l a a m U a ~ o£~~ m o 7E pa m o~~ o a o~ ~ o a o a o o a o o ~ o a w m m In V m In w 9 4 m ul ul F 1` m F m F m m~~ F a m F w w w O N /~ WNw O N U O m3 O N H w O M m w 0 w a 0 m m 0 O !~7! m q ~ ~ Q ~i a O a p~ 7~ a O~ M~ R g O O [~ O R q O' ~ a w a I'1 I-I FI ~ O F g H H C'! O C~ N N w V' O .~ a s o .+ a N z~ . F r •• U~ F r a w w~ O N •• U~ F b U~ z b u :. ~ o ~$ b a~ F~ ~ O b 0a M N~ i 4 r a o~~ I~ r C H D OG b a o~~ 1 .~ b u o~ w I H m z o~ w w a I m o w m m Imo w b m o w F a o W In o U~~ o w F a I a o w F a a I k o w F a a l N I yl N r I yl N r I q q I q q l~l r 0 I q Vf r I N •! ~•/ .. I b \ I N M 111 I N M I(1 I r VI I r a I N b r b a b Ill Ill N [-I I I b r/ r .. I b N r .-. r r .-. r v .~. b I~l b .. b r .. m r O U I w 1 0 N F I O N [-I 1 0 I O F I O N M I O N 1 0 N H ; F .-1 U VI 'i U T U YI UIC YI U 10 .i ~ .-I m m F ~ I O w ga w ~ ~ m n w'~ m gw w " ~ 07 eG w'" ~ w ga w ~ ~ 07 w di w ~ q q U i O V g O F I O U O O F O U g O H I O U g O F I O U g O F I O U q F O U O F I I a F H U m I a F H U m I a F H U m I a F H V m I a F H V m I a F H m m I a F H m w I N u O a ., .~ W b a a F z I I I u O O OI q ~ 07 pfl F T q W o a .~ r, r r F ~ ~ .+ N U I I I I o o.+.i 0 0 N O O O .i M N r VI O O N I I I I N O O O O ' j. O O o N M O O O F I ~ N uR O O I+1 I+1 O o a N I I I I i 4 } ______ } ._.__- 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O CI O O N O IPQa 01 'i V~ O q N OI I N t N Ij O I UU I N ei I H O I a O N I N + I pu~7 Q ~ I a M I ~a] ~- a r ~ m + m A N I # - z o M H Q >H> ~1 a 00 H N I p7 + -- z H I F I a I I V k I pj I a o ~i oa H `'[~yII L N p I pOy' b H O I A A U I I I I 0 0 0 0 A 01 m 01 01 N I I I O O O O m r A A N I I I 0 0 0 0 r OI b T T N I I I 1 0 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 z~ o 0 0 0 M O O O O (~ M N VI O ul .MpT. b r~1 r1 Iq a l o 0 0 0 O z 'MQ~Pi W I I l o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 l o 0 0 0 . a In o 0 0 o a o F I r V~ o In o 0 N I~1 M N N U I 'I .a I ai3zF ~ o 0 a a u F w +--- - 0 u w z z ~ a W r 10 m b O 0 pp'~ 0 oa r p~ Fzl i ~ vl as o ~yFU Ioq I oOG o h, H ~a pG y --_ _. I a o ro I aaln I r.+r .. O N N T N W pl F I O F M~ N V I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~~ - - - - - - + - + ___--. } } __-.__ } # - - - - - - 4 4 - - - - - - 4 } -__.-- 4 - - - - - - # +------+ +------+ +------+ y ----.. } r I m U I t` l o o ms 0 0 b pa p~p1 o o r~ p7 y~ I~1 N b F a ~ b l~ i~ N N W ~ • v H O O N H O m O O m m N O 0 0 0 0 O b q I!1 N b N O q q '/ O O m b m O N N N N I m I H I O t~ w N O z m oalnm Q M O O N YI O H O F u a ~o o In .! o a b vl m o U O m .i N n m O O I e7 I N I N N N I N I I!~ g m N 0 m M M b O m Ifl H .-1 m O y' 1 m m 1~ I+1 ~ IWQ q ~+1 M i~ N q l~ Al w q [~ ~I q H N H N I r I b N q l~ O N g q N H I q I q I {~ O O q r~ q N ~ H b Ifl O H O ~U7 m 1"1 b N VI NI m q b H V~ O b .-1 H q O (4 N N N N j C9 N ~ O0.• N + i - # - # ----- ~ 0. RR o I o N m o 0 j q o ro N b o pl m rl N N b 'I q AI H Y q H O A ~ ~ ' F q ai Iq l~ a l~ m q .p U '] q In a a In In q J F~ 0. ei N N N a y o z ~ ~ ~ ~ O q + + - + - + - - - - - + U I m I q pf I~1 N O b l~l q VI q M q n n a a In q q N N b I~ N I!1 l~ O q 1~1 t` q [~ of M O t~ q rl N N N O M O z x~ ~ o v n oHa .+ e~m H q H A S O N F Z 'J a m H MD d q ~j O rl N ~O I q OG N 1 '~ I I 1 I ~C + - - - 4 - i - - - - - # O t~ N m q O I(1 M b f, O O P o z ~jH~j M N M W ~fi b n O b QED r a 6u ,-i .r In I I I I I In o o In q r~ o o ~n O W N O N l~ r F F oN t~ o N • ~ m I(1 N H H O b q N Ifl F U r m r rn a o R1 N N N +---+-*wazzc~# ~~I I °'aul°rN 4 ~ 10-I i K ~ ~ .O7 O ~ a ~ ~ E°. ~ E°. ~ a m Ww ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ pad~ ~ ~a a I i m ~ 2 I q i U ~ a F .+ K O ~ I I ~ m a +---+. +. + N ~ ~ \ # N F ~ o U W H F • ~ P Y m F ~ O ~ a+ m PPP a q H O # ~ q q U I I~ I~ I I,~- ~, ~ ~ ~ ~r~~~+u~~1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111tlllllllllllllllllllllllllll1 • ~ ,Fra~r i ~. _ _s ~ AGENDA ITEM NO.~ s APPE CE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COn~Il1~NTS SUBJECT: f"l D U ?" Sc%r'~vs~.9i?v' ~'~"~ . -s-,~,~- Y~,¢,,r ~ ~, I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me flu the~~ j~ meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. =_ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: c ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the r le unless i st t d b th t tgth B d t u ruc e n y e majori y o e oar o do otherwise. _ c ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. c ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. -_ _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK c - - - s s t s s s ~ _....__ _. _ ___.-.._.. ..... ..___._ _. i I _- _.-_.___-~___... _... .._ ____.. ___.. fiiiiiiiiiiiiii~iiiiiiiiii~niiiiiiiiiiiiiiinnuiiniiiiii~~io~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiu~in~in~i~~~~~~~~iii~itiiii~~ u-~ BRIDGE LOST MOUNTAIN RD. °~ TWELVE O'CLOCK KNOB RD. • • BRIDGE AT LOST MOUNTAIN RD. & TV~ELVE O'CLOCK KNOB RD. Approximately seven days after the rain fall following the first large snow fall January 1995. Upstream side of bridge blocked by silt and debris. Not flood condition. ^ ~k ?~,, ~x,~: .~-'. ~x:: ; t~.; , <.,: • • ~J ,; The bridge after VDOT cleaned out upstream blockage. C7 t • T .s'd` ~ .~ ' ~ J I - ~~ 3:. ~ ~ Deterioration of barrels and concrete on upstream side. ., I r iA~• rf ' ~Y4`~ ,r •^ :\ Barrels on the downstream side which are the better preserved. • CITIZEN PETITION The undersigned residents respectfully request that the construction of the bridge on Secondary Route 670 (Lost Mountain Road) at its intersection with Secondary Route 694 (12 O'clock Knob Road) in Roanoke County be expedited for these reasons: 1) The existing alignment of the intersection of Lost Mountain Road, 12 O'clock Knob Road and Canyon Road is a hazard for school bus access. 2) The existing low-water bridge consisting of culverts made from 55-gallon drums is subject to blockage by sedimentation and debris and is a continual maintenance problem by VDOT.- 3) Safe access from Lost Mountain Road is periodically • blocked, resulting in job interference, disruption of mail and newspaper deliveries and increased risks from emergency situations. The bridge was flooded continuously for more than a week beginning January 17, 1996. Signature ,~, '~ ~~~ ~'~~~~ Printed Name Address /Icrot~~'/ ,~./`7~2.~idQr,~P,~~~ ~H~,Z l~ a Lfo~./C,~/~d. ~GGhG~ett' C_'. /7eslY~'-i:s0.~ ~/~ /u~~iE' ~~~ Ks~d ~L' ~,,,,Q G~,4- T-iG0/X ~e~~.~~ly ~Z~i Pa~,~,e( Dom. i~ vG h o1C .P ~"~ 2- ~~ ~ Gam; d~~ . ~~ ~- ~~ i~ CITIZEN PETITION The undersigned residents respectfully request that the construction of the bridge on Secondary Route 670 (Lost Mountain Road) at its intersection with Secondary Route 694 (12 O'clock Knob Road) in Roanoke County be expedited for these reasons: ~~`~ 1) The existing alignment of the intersection of Lost ~-~r Mountain Road, 12 O'clock Knob Road and Canyon Road is a hazard for school bus access. 2) The existing low-water bridge consisting of culverts made from 55-gallon drums is subject to blockage by sedimentation and debris and is a continual maintenance problem by VDOT. • 3) Safe access from Lost Mountain Road is periodically blocked, resulting in job interference, disruption of mail and newspaper deliveries and increased risks from emergency situations. The bridge was flooded continuously for more than a week beginning January 17, 1996. p, Signature r' . } ,_ 1 ~ ~~ ~f ~~~ Printed Name Address ~e;~,,,,,~~~ ~ ~ ~,yd s'v~~y ~~_~ z~ d;~rr_ nd_ `~ ~~~~z ~1ae ~``~"i,~' ~ ~ f~,,~ t~ , ,4 G ~{ it1 4 ~~ ~ ~„ V a1-. ~- ~ f ry ,oQN ~. ~~~~ :~~r~ ~Q1T~rN ~~ !~ oa~oTy~ ~y o~ ~ /rte-.~~-dUa~~ , v~ _ a ~~~~' • Signature Printed Name. Address ~~~..~~- ~ ~~ P~~ ~ ~~ A ~1. Pte; « s ~ g8 L-~s ~- ~~, c~a/o ~ , ~ /A ~~01 S C~ V G' ~ T C" i ~ `c' > ZZSS C ~- Vr.~~.~ ~Y ) ~. ~c~l , J ~,~, ~Gt~w ltc. e~ ~ ~ /- .. I'~ Sri bEd if E... ~/if rL Y ~~~ ~cLr~ ~~ Ch ~~c~-,~,~~,~~- ~ ~~ - ~~~~ ~ . E • /w'~2Y -7s3~ A~Act~~ov E SET ~.r" • _2_ • CITIZEN PETITION The undersigned residents respectfully request that the.. construction of the bridge on Secondary Route 670 (Lost Mountain Road) at its intersection with Secondary Route 694 (12 O'clock Knob Road) in Roanoke County be expedited for these reasons: 1) The existing alignment of the intersection of Lost Mountain Road, 12 O'clock Knob Road and Canyon Road is a hazard for school bus access. 2) The existing low-water bridge consisting of culverts made from 55-gallon drums is subject to blockage by sedimentation and debris and is a continual maintenance problem by VDOT. 3) Safe access from Lost Mountain Road is periodically • blocked, resulting in job interference, disruption of mail and newspaper deliveries and increased risks from emergency situations. The bridge was flooded continuously for more than a week beginning January 17, 1996. Signatu e Printed Name Address i ' (~ ~~~~ S ~. ~~ . , ~ "/7~,tvc ~,E=~ 4G LA ~'i Arc~E/~ S y~ ~ ~`~9~~uv~ -~~~~=- ~~2%/Y vac' E L ~~~ ~'S .~~5 `/ Lus 7` r iT/c' ~ `~ ~~ -~ f ,.~ t~.c° ~r' cC' < <~a~ *,,, • Signature Printed Name l~~i~D ,~ ~-~/~ d~So/?/ jig, CUv^~ /l/ ~! d-~= Vil~.~ ern u .I~~CIL~pr~L<<F • \ ~~ Address S t~ ~3 ! ~. oG l ~ ~k (c •.ob ~~cQ ~9~k~ J~~1 ~tf U ~~ c~3 ~~ ~~~~ ~~ , ~~~ ate: ~a a~ old ~ P~s~ J_ u` ~'~ ~ ~-- ~/ ~' ~Z~ ~~~~ l.~/ ~7~s u~~~s ~ ~~ ~/~~ n /~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ Lf~c~ ~~~ /~~ ~,1,~~~Z ~~-~.ti r~r L/~- ~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~ k_~, • -2- • C] Signature Printed Name ~I~~ ~I. e ~'I~~ . _ ~~ t 1 D e -2- Address ,~v5v /7~c~~~ ~oQ ~'~~ z rn r «s l~ r- ~- o~~ ~~~ °`~ ~~ ~ ~~ U~ ~-~(o~~ (ds ?!/ ~f ~ -"- ~~~ ~~~ ~~~~Y~l~ l~ /i v_l AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 1996 ORDINANCE 022796-10 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO CHRISTIAN LIFE FELLOWBHIP PENTECOSTAL HOLINESS CHIIRCH TO CONSTRUCT A RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY FACILITY AT THE INTERSECTION OF ROUTE 11 AND BTATE ROUTE 777 (TAB MAP NO. 54.04-3-1), CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Christian Life Fellowship Pentecostal Holiness Church has filed a petition to construct a religious assembly facility located at the intersection of Route 11 and State Route 777 (Tax Map No. 54.04-3- 1) in the Catawba Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on February 6,1996; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on January 23, 1996; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on February 27, 1996. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Christian Life Fellowship Pentecostal Holiness Church located at the intersection of Route 11 and State Route 777 (Tax Map No. 54.04- 3-1) in the Catawba Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1-456 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved with the following condition: (1) Petitioner will provide a 25 foot buffer yard with evergreen trees and shrubs per ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Harrison to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson 1 NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. lton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Arnold Covey, Director, John W. Birckhead, Real Paul M. Mahoney, County Director, Planning & Zoning Engineering & Inspections Estate Assessment Attorney 2 Q P~ % , $- SEA 1 ~-~ ~ ~q/~ ' ' ~ S ~ iq t ~ '' r . ~ `~- 1 pr 50 S-.sTE Q . ~ a ~/ _~~" 77,7 - G~ ~a°~ s y .- !CE To3a v_ti:c+wr~k-~--~ ~ r~~~ ~'' ica 94 \ 9? oG 4F~ ~0! ~~ ~v~~EJ~Y S~ s f sat_~t,+ ~ ~ 4 ~ ¢O ~A~ 3d ~ ~j~~`DP.IS-RrFS aRR01K EAD ]R ~„ ~RIOR'c^ ( ~ ~• ~~~~Ai - _ _ .,, - ~ - .2= 1RHG`?$.D~N ' RD. VICINITY MAP -.~ ~~- i. ~a -1 ~-i _ ~ . a NORTH { tiv •25 gtt24 ' 23 ~~~ Tt~e ~.~~ 'p/t ~i 0~5 8 ~r-• ~ ,{g • ~ .536 •' R/ F. ~ +~-• 12 >o r :'9rs' ••... ~ ('~ '139 •~~2 ~~ a ~'' F' 1 / 1 ~I Ac ,' ~..,. .~/233y 'ter 72" ~ ~ i 6O +er° :>;" „ isle} .STS ~ p'\ , 17 °~ /h ~ r• ~.u s • `L83Ae fOl t.SOAe -v .,, i ~ ° '• 79 •si: e . 8I ~°js, 3q , l... V A ,. ~. ~ .•. v„ . ,~ ~ . 1 • ea '~,o 86(~~ r. °? I •` ° 3 s / 7. •A ~ ~. .J c io / ~ y(' ~ y \\ \ / ~ ~ ~ t ~22~ C/Ir of So/im ~ ISBTAc Nbnei Filhehpll Plen/ I/JJ i See Map 6.00 I' • 400 eo.._ - .. .. _.... ~'~ DEPARZMENP OF PLANNING CHRISTIAN LIFE FELLOWSPECIAL USE PERMIT - _ 54.04-3-t a AND ZONIIr'G .: . ~. WI PETITIONER: CHRiSITAN LIFE FEL.I.OWSHIP PENTECOSTAL HOLINESS CHURCH CASE NUMBER: 2-2/96 Planning Commission Hearing Date: February 6, 1996 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: February 27, 1996 A. REQUEST Petition of Christian Life Fellowship Pentecostal Holiness Church for a Special Use Permit to construct a religious assembly facility, located at the intersection of Route 11 and State Route 777, Catawba Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Commission asked about the property line which extends to the center of Route 777. Staff said that an agreement would need to be worked out with the property owner and VDOT, especially to obtain an access to Route 777. The Commission inquired as to the type of buffer that will be used. Jeff Parkhill, architect, said they are proposing a 25 foot buffer yard between their parking lot and the historic Pleasant Grove site. The evergreen trees in the buffer yard shall be at least 5 feet in height. D. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS 1) Petitioner will provide a 25 foot buffer yard with evergreen trees and shrubs per ordinance. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Ms. Hooker moved to recommend approval of the petition with the condition. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Witt, Hooker, Robinson, Ross, Thomason NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map Staff Report _ Other Terrance Ha ngton, Se any Roanoke ounty Pla ng Commission STAFF REPORT v-i PETffIONER: CHRISTIAN LIFE FELLOWSHIP PENTECOSTAL HOLINESS CHURCH CASE NUMBER: 2-2196 PREPARED BY: TIM BEARD DATE: FEBRUARY 6, 1995 PART I A. EXECLfi1VE SUMMARY nation Tlel>`..;~;~;<~'osec3<d ~~ ~ e ~°~>: e~:etail ..e~nscster~ with the Derrefo . meq~..desl .::.:. ...................................... e....::.l...::: rr.?....: n.::: #.:.:::.:.................................... ,......:..:::::.::::::.. ~ :::.: ~ :::::::::::::.::.::....:...:.. E~.:..:.............:::.::.:.. g.................. ... vffh$ ~Coniprehensr~~~~~Ptar~>as~a community acorn cen erx B. DESCRIPTION Petition of Christian Life Fellowship Pentecostal Holiness Church for a Special Use Permit to construct a religious assembly facility, located at the intersection of Route 11 and State Route 777, Catawba Magisterial District. The petitioner's master plan indicates a 1,000-seat sanctuary, a family life center, youth/choir, educational, and administrative facilities. At this time, no space is specifically designated for a day care facility. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS The zoning ordinance requires that a Special Use Permit be acquired prior to establishing or substantially expanding a religious assembly facility in the R-1 district. Specific use and design standards for this use type include a maximum building coverage of 20 percent, a maximum lot coverage of 50 percent of the total lot area, and additional screening and buffering of parking areas and outdoor activity locations which adjoin residential use types. A commercial entrance permit will be required by VDOT. 2 PART II ~ j - ~/ A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDffIONS Site Characteristics -The applicant's 7.85 acre parcel is generally flat with well- defined swales near the southeast and east property boundaries and a steep embankment uphill to I-81 along the north border. The site is grassed and exhibits dense, small deciduous tree growth lining Stypes Branch near its confluence with the Roanoke River. Surrounding Neighborhood -The property is bounded on the north by I-81, on the east by VA secondary route 777 and on the south by US 11. Abroad mix of residential, commercial, industrial, and institutional uses occur nearby. Single family residential uses (including the Cherokee Hills Subdivision), and a mobile home park are found to the north. East of Route 777 stands Ft. Lewis Baptist Church. Across Route 11 to the south is Progressive Products Corporation (an industrial supply center) and a single family dwelling. West of the subject property is historic Pleasant Grove, a landmark dating back to 1853 displaying a derivation of Georgian architecture and Greek revival exterior details. Pleasant Grove has been recommended for the National Register of Historic Places. B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Layout/Architecture - At buildout, the petitioner proposes a 38,125 square foot, M maximum two-story building. Per the applicant's architect, a 14,225 square foot family life center would be built as the first of five phases followed by a 10,380 square foot sanctuary and 13,130 square feet of educational and administrative floor space constructed in three phases. The family life center may display a brick and veneer front and pre-engineered metal side and rear walls. Final design may be of any type. The proposed building would be centrally located. The concept plan also indicates parking for 315 vehicles. The proposed building coverage would be well under the maximum 30 percent permitted although the total lot coverage (including all substantially impervious surfaces) nearly reaches the 50 percent maximum allowed. Access/Traffic Generation -The County engineering staff has requested that the property owner donate right-of-way for Routes 11 and 777 (Ft. Lewis Church Road). The situation may be more pressing for Route 777 given that the church's ownership ___ currently extends to the center of the road. " The 1994 ADT count for Ft. Lewis Church Road was 2,292. Three accidents were reported during the period 1992-94 at its intersection with US 11. The 1993 ADT on US 11 was 11,000. Provided sight distance requirements are met, VDOT concurs with the proposed access from Route 777. As a practical matter, given the location of Stypes Branch and its accompanying flood hazard area, the property should have only one access from US 11 due to the County's minimum 500-foot separation requirement between access points on an arterial highway. Based on ITE Trip Generation estimates per thousand gross square feet of building, staff estimates an additional 1,200 trips per day. The majority of these would be generated at off peak times on Sundays and during the evening. This should lessen the projected impact on existing Route 11 traffic. v-~ 3 Fire Rescue/Utilities -This area is served by Ft. Lewis Station. Emergency vehicle travel time is estimated at four minutes or less. Public water is available to the property through a 16-inch line on the south side of US 11. Along the parcel's east boundary, Phase I of the north loop of the County's water line extension from~S.Lri_ng Holll ervoir is underway ruc ion protect is under study C along US 11 a ug no sewer is presently available. -- ----_ ~ __ _ _- Drainage/Floodplain -The proposed project would create nearly four acres of impervious surface to be served by a series of three detention ponds along the site's south border with US 11. The concept plan also indicates an overabundance of parking spaces (323 total) compared to the minimum parking supply required for the proposal (250). No changes in grade are proposed for the parking lot and two box culverts are proposed for Stypes Branch which is a FEMA designated flood hazard area where no increase in flood elevations are permitted. A Corps of Engineers floodplain study will be necessary prior to development. Screening & Buffering -The property's west border with the Pleasant Grove tract requires a Type C buffer yard between the proposed parking area and the property line. If a 25-foot buffer is maintained (as indicated on the concept plan), small evergreen trees and one row of evergreen shrubs would also be required. The petitioner could choose the optional 15-foot buffer yard which includes asix-foot tall screening fence. Where parking is proposed adjacent to public streets, a minimum six-foot wide planting strip shall be established between the parking lot and adjacent rights-of-way. Within the strip, large or small deciduous or evergreen trees and evergreen shrubs are required. Also 7 percent of the parking lot must consist of landscaped medians, peninsulas or planter islands containing small deciduous trees. C. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The subject property is designated Development by the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. Institutional uses are limited under Development category guidelines according to public facilities and environmental capacity, water and sewer availability, urban sector location, and major street access. The proposal is consistent with Policy D-7 which encourages neighborhood activity centers such as schools, churches, and parks. D. CONFORMANCE WffH COUNTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD The proposed development represents near maximum development of a 7.85 acre R- 1 zoned parcel. Review and approval of site and building plans, erosion and sediment control and stormwater management/flood study plans will be required. PART III STAFF CONCLUSIONS . This proposal poses potential impacts on adjacent highways (US 11 and VA 777), the Stypes Branch watershed (site rests 400 feet north of the Roanoke River), and on the historic residence and grounds of Pleasant Grove. It may be possible to mitigate these potential impacts through careful site planning and eventual construction. • • COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.O. Box 29800 - ~ - - Roanoke, VA 24018 _ (703) 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 cic1J _ jzIZ2 f°/S~- For staff use only r''"f' IL'zz~'i~ `~'~ date rece' d•' 'ved application fe ~ PC/BZA date- placardsplacards i BOS datedate: Case Number: r Check type of application filed (check all that apply): ~ REZONING ®SPECIAL USE VARIANCE Applicant's name: Hughes Associates Architects, PC Phone: 342-4002 Address: D. Jeffry Parkhi 11 Zip Code: 2 4 0 0 5 - P.O. Box 1034, Roanoke, Virginia Owner's name: Christ~an Life Fellowship Pent>~ostal Phone: g28-0267 Holinesss~hurch Mark Atkinson Zi Code: 24153 Address: , P 307 North Bruff Street Salem Vir inia Location of property: Tax Map Number: 54 .04=3-1 Intersection of Rt. 11( 460) and State Rt. 777 Magisterial District: Catawba Community Planning Area: Glenvar Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: R-1 7.85 acres Existing Land Use: Vacant 3 41 , 9 4 6 sq.ft. Proposed Zoning: R_ 1 For Staff Use on/y Proposed Land Use: Religious Assembly Use Type: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES v NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. ~~ Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES X NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES N/A NO Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws l" Consultation Application Justification ws . v ws v 8 1 /2" x 1 1" concept plan Application fee :m~ Metes and bounds description ~;«f Proffers, if applicable <"~. Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners l hereby certify that / am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner. v-~ Owner's Signature: For Sfatf Use Only: Case Number ~~ Applicant Ghri ~ i an T ; fa Fellowshi p Penticostal Holiness Church The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change iri terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicabie zoning districtclassification in the zoning ordinance. • • This project is a religious assembly facility to be located on a 7.85 acrE site for Christian Life Fellowship Penticostal Holiness Church. The site is located at West Main Street (Routes 460 and 11 at Route 777). This request is for a special use permit for the Master Plan of Multi phase building program with an ultimate size of 38,185 SF with a seating capacit for 1,000. This facility will aid in the creastion of a convenient, attractive and harmonious community and reduce over all land use density, without increase to the public services. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Religious assembly facilities are permitted by the zoning ordinance by special use permit and is generally consistant with the comprehensive plan Street access, and public water are available. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. The proposed project will have minimal impact on the adjoining properties with regard to water, sewer, schools or fire rescue. Traffic along West Main Street will'~increas~e with this facility but~will~be concentrated at other than peak times, primarily Sunday mornings and evenings and some limited weekday use. Adequate on site parking at 3.1/1 seat is proposed (4/1 seat required). Storm water run off will be contained prior to discharge under Route 460. ~. % . ~.~ ,...,,., 1 I j 1 ~ I ~ 7 1 ` ~~-_ I ~ ~ •• 1 / i~ ~ _ ~ ~~% ~ ~ I i I i i ~~-~~ ~ ~_ ~ ~ ~ I ~~ I ~/~ ~ -~/ I ,. ,_ I . " .~ ~ , ___ \ / y \ / I W y- ~ g n ' o '~i Z ` ~ ~ _ ~_~ ' 1 ~~J-_ 1 ~ ;~ ~~ / I r• 1 ~~C -~~~~ 1 II ~~~ _ Mw I I \;\\`~~~ m _ a ~~1~ \ \ (1J \\ 1 1 1 ~~ 1 11 j~ 1 / ~ t ~ 1 r uIiIIJr N r 'v~w ~ \ 1 U~ Q 8 ~ ~ f I I II 'd' 1 ~~ r I ; 11i1~ 1 1'M ~ i I I ~ I , ; ~, i ~ 1 1 ~ I 1 X ~ 1 Z li ~ i i , \' `\ ~. ~1 I ~ 1 1 lf~ 111 ~ ~I e~. ~6~" ' I 1 ~ {, / i n m ~ IQly~ ~~ .' i I \ 3 ~ ~ ~Z ryz "~ ~ ~"' / ~ 3 i ~ m l~l 11 II ~ w , j / ~~ - I ~ v d~ O a/ ~ I / ~~ ii•• l I O Q_ ~Z II ~Z~ II V r\ // Y z j I ( 1 t ~~rt z' zap zA'p~ z ~`~\ ~ `I` / ~ ~ ~~ ~ z ~ ~ ~ ~WC~'SO~ =w~~a ~O %~ i ~ ~ ~ $ ~ ~O~ 0 ~ ill1.~~ ~ a x , , ' , w iL 1L O du7(Y ~ cnIYIL~ atr ~~i z'~ ~ z ~ ~ ~ ~: ~ ~ dJ ~ ~ A ~°` ~~ I lit ~ ~ ~ ~ I V diL~.au a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` W cn Ul cr) cn ~ cn ~' ~, ~ ' N I, dOryp00 ~ ~ ~~\ ~\ A ,-- ~ g v Z z 9- ~ z ,,,. ;. ~ .. ~ z ~ o Q ~, ~ ~ ~, 1 ~ z w w ~.~ aaaaaa ~- a O O ~ O O gRn~ ~` \ ~ ~ ~\ ~\ 1 N ~ o -~ ~ ~! ~ ~ .~ ~ 4zr-~ ~, ~ \\I `I ~ ~ I 1 I ~ g I. • ROAHOICE COQNTY UTZLITY DEPARTMBNT - - - APPLICATION FOR WATER OR SEWER SERVICE - TO PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Date December 19, 1995 Name of Applicant D. Jeffry Parkhill Phone 540-342-4002 Address of Applicant P.O. Box 1034, Roanoke, Virginia 24005 Mark Atkinson Name of Developer Christian Life Fellowship PhoneS40-928-0267 en icos a o mess Church Address of Developer 307 N. Bruffy Street, Salem, Virginia 24153 Name of Design Engineer Not Selected Address of Design Engineer N/A Phone Name of Contact Person D. Jeffry Parkhill v-~ Name of Proposed Development Christian Life Fellowship Penticostal Holiness Church - Type of Development and proposed number of units (Be specific) - 600 seat multipurpose facility. Future expansion to accommodate 1,000 seat sanctuary with classrooms to support. 193 car parking parking expanded to 323 cars. Location of proposed development (FURNISH COPY OF I~~ AND PLP.NTi~LTRIC Iv~'u5ER) Intersection Rts. 460(11) west (West Main Street) and Rt. 777 Size of proposed development in acres: 7.85 Acres Give minimum and maximum elevation (Use USGS Elevations) at which the individual water/sewer service connections would be located: Minimum 1086 ~- feet MSL. ' ~ ~ • ~ Maximum 1 098± ~ ""`feet MSL~ ~~- ~ •• • - ~ • Is this application for a development that will be a part or section of a larger future development? X No Yes If yes, provide map of entire area if available. (OYEZ) _ 'Signature of ~ A p ~ - - ~-- - - __ _. _ -. - - ~ - - - r ` '.~.._ i ~~ `` ~ ~-. -, A~-vim . .~} ; . i pjR EASH~36 2 15 ~ .- _~> ~ _ - _ ~;- :1~'~ic ,, \ l1 t ~~ ~1, : -, 3 f~ t ~ t, 1~1G . 1 ' ~\f ~~ ~ _ ~ ~~ ~ x r , `~ ~ '1 T - '~ - ~Q~v ~ ~8'sE~~-° ~ e~q~is~ . ,P - S P S / * 0 LEln3 ~A?6a 4! QfL1C£ -' 1 P X034 ~ V.-M..wK c v ` 7F~7 9 \ t0 ~ 9 ~ Q'IE v+a $a :~ ~ . , 7 ~ 'D.~ ~G 4~F ~ ~ Gt ^J ~ Z' ~ p J ~OKEJI.SY ~ f WATEZi FlLTi. v CL$ - 't' PLANT b a - \ ~ , '~ ARROW ~~ ~ ~RipR'c^ ~ ~. \\ , - .2y \ \\ 1RH~$.p~ N ` R V1C1N1TY MAP ~ I o_~ ~.e . ~~-- . v-- ~ - NORiH See Map 6°_.CO I' • 400 646 @orys~. ... ~. _. ~ I DEPARTMENP OF PLANNING CHRISTIAN LIFE FELLOWSPECIAL USE PERMIT AND ZONING 54.04-3-t J_ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 1996 ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO CHRISTIAN LIFE FELLOWSHIP PENTECOSTAL HOLINESS CHURCH TO CONSTRUCT A RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY FACILITY AT THE INTERSECTION OF ROUTE 11 AND STATE ROUTE 777 (TAX MAP NO. 54.04-3-1), CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DIS- TRICT WHEREAS, Christian Life Fellowship Pentecostal Holiness Church has filed a petition to construct a religious assembly facility located at the intersection of Route 11 and State Route 777 (Tax Map No. 54.04-3- 1) in the Catawba Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on February 6,1 996; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on January 23, 1996; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on February 27, 1996. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Christian Life Fellowship Pentecostal Holiness Church located at the intersection of Route 11 and State Route 777 (Tax Map No. 54.04- 3-1) in the Catawba Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1-456 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved with the following condition: (1) Petitioner will provide a 25 foot buffer yard with evergreen trees and shrubs per ordinance. zoning.chrisitan.Ife v __a-- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TIIESDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 1996 ORDINANCE 022796-11 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 1.448-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED 6152 TWINE HOLLOW ROAD (TA8 MAP NO. 63.04-3-18.1) IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF I- 1, CONDITIONAL, TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF I-1, UPON THE APPLICATION OF ROBERT AND I. R. STVERAR WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on January 23, 1966, and the second reading and public hearing were held February 27, 1996; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on February 6, 1996; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 1.448 acres, as described herein, and located at 6152 Twine Hollow Road (Tax Map Number 63.04-3-18.1) in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of I-1, Conditional, Industrial District, to the zoning classification of I-1, Industrial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Robert and I. R. Stverak. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the center of Virginia Secondary Route 778 at the northwest corner of the property of Charlie Lee Bratton (DB 1113, page 360); thence with the center of Virginia Secondary Route 778, N. 47 deg. 54' 54"- W. 310.09 feet to a point; thence leaving Virginia Secondary Route 778, 1 ~~ S. 29 deg. 53' 34" W. 149.25 feet to a point; thence S. 29 deg. 50' 14" E. 262.27 feet to a point; thence S. 39 deg. 00' 13" E. 95.65 feet to a point on the property of Charlie Lee Bratton; thence with the same N. 27 deg. 0' 00" E. 414.00 feet to the Place of Beginning. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. lton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 2 ~t 0 v~`~- NORTH A~ 3 I Z~ ~~~ ~:::_. ~~~Site.: '~'0 1, j ~e chain ~~ ~,~ ,.:.~ P~, ok, ~°a P ~°a Interstate 81 Roanoke County Stverak Site Department of Tax Parcel: 63.04-3-18.1 Planning & Zoning Scale: 1" =500' January 1, 1996 ~/- o~. PETITIONER: ROBERT & I.R_ STVERAI~ CASE NUMBER: 3-2/96 Planning Commission Hearing Date: February 6, 1996 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: February 27, 1996 A. REQUEST Petition of Robert and I.R. Stverak to rezone 1.448 acres from I-1 conditional to I-1 to permit light industrial use, located at 6152 Twine Hollow Road, Catawba Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Commission inquired as to dedication of the right-of--way. Mr. Hamngton responded that he will initiate discussion with the owners. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS None. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Ms. Hooker moved to recommend approval of the petition noting that staff will discuss the issue of right-of--way dedication. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Witt, Hooker, Robinson, Ross, Thomason NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report _ Other Terrance H gton, retary Roanoke C ty Planning Commission v-a- STAFF REPORT PART I PETITION: Rezoning Request of RL. and I.R Stverak 11 C to 11, located at 6152 Twine Hollow Road A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This is a request to remove a proffered condition on the- property that limits the use of the property to the assembly of electronic components. This request has been made to allow the current owners of the property to sell the property for use as any type of permitted 11 use type. The general area is a mixture of heavy industrial use types and scattered rural single family residences. B. DESCRIPTION This is a petition of R.L and I.R. Stverak to rezone a 1.448 parcel of land from its current designation of 11 C to 11. The property is located at 6152 Twine Hollow Road in the Catawba Magisterial District. The property is now used as an industrial electronics assembly facility. The Stveraks' wish to relocate this facility and market the property for any 11 industrial use. This property was conditionally rezoned to 11 C in 1984 at the request of the current applicant . The 1984 rezoning encompassed 4.7 acres of land. The property was subsequently subdivided into four tracts. Only one of the four tracts is now the subject of this rezoning. In 1984 the property was designated Industrial Reserve in the 1977 County Master Plan. Current conditions on the property restrict its use to the assembly of electronic components with no etching operation. Removal of this condition would allow the property to be used for any by-right 11 use type. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS A site plan will not be required if the property is used for another industrial use type. Future additions to the building will require a site plan, building permit, and VDOT commercial entrance permit. • 1 -?-~ i• A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS PART II 1. Topography The property lies above Twine Hollow Road. Developed portions of the site are graded flat to accommodate the existing building and parking area. 2. Vegetation Little significant vegetation remains on the site. 3. Existing Physical Development The site is currently developed for industrial usage. A single 40' x 75' metal building is on the site, which also contains a gravel parking lot for approximately 25 cars. 4. Access and Circulation The site is approximately one mile from the intersection of Twine Hollow Road and Dow Hollow Road. Access to Twine Hollow is provided by a single driveway that intersects Twine Hollow at a sharp angle. The angle of this driveway prohibits vehicles from safely entering Twine Hollow . The Engineering Department has suggested that the applicant consider proffering the dedication of right-of -way along Twine Hollow to facilitate the future improvement of this road. 5. Surrounding Neighborhood The surrounding neighborhood is a mixture of small rural residential homes and heavy industrial use types. Industrial uses in the area include an explosive manufacturer, the Dixie Caverns Landfill, and an abandoned stone quarry and asphalt processing site. It is because of the existence of these industrial uses, that the County's 1977 Master Plan designated the general area for industrial reserve. • File No.: Petition: 2 B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ~''` 1. Site La out Y No information on a proposed site layout is submitted as part of this request. Any future owner of the property will need to submit a site plan for approval if any changes of site layout are proposed. 2. Traffic Generation Estimates of future traffic generation are difficult to estimate. ITE estimates for light industrial uses indicate an average expected trip generation of approximately 80 vpd for a light industrial use on a 1.4 acre parcel. Twine Hollow Road had an ADT of 531 VPD in 1994 based upon VDOT counts. Significant truck traffic has been on Twine Hollow Road over the past few years as a result of the closure of the Dixie Caverns landfill. 3. Utilities Water and sewer service are not currently available to the site. 4. Fire/Rescue The Fire and Rescue Department indicates that the approval of this request will not result in a change of fire and rescue services to the site. C. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This general area of the county was designated Industrial Reserve in the 1977 Master Plan. It was under this plan that this property was originally rezoned and developed as an industrial land use. The 1985 Comprehensive Plan designated this area of the County Rural Preserve . File No.: Petition: 3 • • PART III STAFF CONCLUSIONS The industrial use of this land was established in 1984. Removal of the existing condition limiting the use of the property would not significantly change the use of the site or the character of the general area. PREPARED BY: Terry Harrington ~-a- DATE PREPARED: February 1, 1996 Petition: 4 File No.: • a COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 5204 Bernard Dr. - - P.O. Box 29800 - Roanoke, VA 24018 ( 54d 772-2068 FAX ( 54a 772-2 i 08 :tcJ - i2 ~1~~i3 =}-- A'`~,i, fz~zi/:S `L-~ ~,AI For _tra/f use only I V' '~ dater ved ceived by: appfi ati t • ~ PCii3~ placards issued: BO date: Case Number: ~• Check type of application filed (check all that apply}: ~} REZONING ^ SPECIAL USE ^ VARIANCE Applicant's name: Rqbe t L. an I. R. Stveraj~ Aheron & Agee ~ att Ferguson ~sterhou~t Fhone: 774-1197 , , , Address: c/o 1919 Electric Road, Suite 1 Zip Code: 24018 Roanoke VA Owner's name: Robert Stverak and I. R. Stverak Phone: 380-2099 Address: c/o Roma Properties, P. 0. Box 264 Zip Code: Salem, VA 241 3 Location of property: Tax Map Number: 3.04-3-18. 1 6152 Twine Hollow Road ;.iagisterial District: Catawba Salem, VA Community Planning Area: Glenvar Size of parcel (s}: Existing Zoning: I-1C 1.448 acres Existing Land Use: The operation of an electrical components assembly sq.ft. plant. :~:: Proposed Zoning: 1-1 For Staff use Only Proposed Land Use: Light Manufacturing Use Type: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, v~id:~~, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES X NO IF NO, A VARI;,NCE IS REQUIRED F1RST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for t..=_ requested Use Type? YES X NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffere~ •:~ith this request? YES NO X Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclcsed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEtv15 ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. X Consultation X 8 1 /2' x 1 1' concept plan X Application fee X Application X ~'-~ Metes and bounds description `';~ Proffers, if applicable X Justification ~: Water and sa•.ver application X Adjoining property owners • l hereby certify that l am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting wish the knowledge and ent of the o:~ner. Owner's Signature: .. ~ _ .. .. , _ - F^r StaN, Use On/y: Case Number ~/' ~` ,;,;::;:;:,~:;: ~s~:::::::::€s ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: f:}" .: rFt.~.~t~:°s~~~r~~:...:...~.~FR~..~ ....:.:.:.:...:............:.:.:..:.:.:::..:.:....:.:....:......:....... ~:`.U~'~Ifl.~.4.T .....f . Applicant Rebert L. and I. R. Stverak The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the follo~::ing questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. .,Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the !i purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. The property has been used since it was rezoned in 1984 for the purpose of an electrical components assembly plant. The present owner has relocated his business and .desires to place the property on the market. The adjoining property is industrial and the only suitable use of the existing facility weld be for light industrial use. The existing proffer limiting the use to electronic component assembly plant with no etching operation" is too restrictive for sale on the market. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County comprehensive Plan. 'The zoning category will not change. This is simply the elimination of a proffer limiting and restricting the use in the I-1 District. I-1 uses on this property would not be objectionable. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. There will be no additional imposition on County utilities and services other than as presently exists. 1 1. 1 "7. g5 1 1 = 44AM SOUTH STA ~ !,''! _ - t~.B . 88? PG .133 _ 5 5 f . 50' 1.13 I ° 23' O~ ` ~ --~ ~ n 299.85' Z ~ ~ 11 ~ ag.s' D ~~ CR ~ ly ~ . L. _ c? - ~~ ~ N L ~ ~j C ~ 22.9 2.x.5 ~r ~ ~ i ~ o lv - e~ru~,,i ~ l ~4vE1gtQ~ W c ~ - ~ ~ 1 1 { e ~ u 5 29 - 53 -34 Y~1 nip 127.00' 20~` ~ ~ -~ZZ 2 . ti .~ ~ ~ ~ y ~y R ~ ~ ~0 ~N ~~~ i ~' 8~ -o~" w O t~ • m ~~ ~ N N t r ~ D rN m - C~ LPL ' ~~9 A~ w 27~.25~ oy ~ •~ 149.2 5' n ~(~j N ~~ ~ ~ u /A~~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ y ^ - ~ ~~ ~ in / pn / ~~ ~ t •~ R1= /~/ ~ - w -~~ ~/~ ,w ~ -ti / ,~ ~ ~ ~ ti , !- ~~ X10 ~" ~ ~~ ~ ` tat oR~,~ t-ra~ ` e ~8c, f+HOP / ~ 1 ti F ?r ~ I ~ "'~ n f p t UI ~ - fi L •8 ` ~ ~ _ ~ ~r ~ ! / -~ 25~;T2' .~. Saq.oo't3'e. -EFt ,_ ...~-- g 2Z °00 • ~ . W 41 ~ .OCR'. C ~-.~ ~kR Lt E LEE gR'd- ~~~~ . n 0 GV ~ 0 0 ~ .~ ~' j~ 1 ar*~ - ,~: _ c T ~ 73 C ~ ~rsoo ~ ,I '~ c~PM P "~~ I C ~ 1 ~ ~, :`CE 910 ~ _ .s_ . c'~cFxs ~ ` 1 ~ . • Oy ---~ ti~ r„ OI I -RAlLFR v ARx .~ r I cl 0 ~-~- NORTH Roanoke County Stverak Site Department of Tax Parcel: 63.04-3-18.1 Planning & Zoning Scale: 1" =500' January 1, 1996 v-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 1996 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 1.448-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED 6152 TWINE HOLLOW ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 63.04-3- 18.1) IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF I-1, CONDITIONAL, TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF I-l, UPON THE APPLICATION OF ROBERT AND I. R. STVERAR WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on January 23, 1966, and the second reading and public hearing were held February 27, 1996; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on February 6, 1996; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 1.448 acres, as described herein, and located at 6152 Twine Hollow Road (Tax Map Number 63.04-3-18.1) in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of I-l, Conditional, Industrial District, to the zoning classification of I-1, Industrial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Robert and I. R. Stverak. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the center of Virginia Secondary Route 778 at the northwest corner of the property of Charlie Lee Bratton (DB 1113, page 360); thence with the center of Virginia Secondary Route 778, N. 47 deg. 54' S4" W. 310.09 feet to a point; thence leaving Virginia Secondary Route 778, S. 29 deg. 53' 34" W. 149.25 feet to a point; thence S. 29 :. v-a- deg. 50' 14" E. 262.27 feet to a point; thence 5. 39 deg. 00' 13" E. 95.65 feet to a point on the property of Charlie Lee Bratton; thence with the same N. 27 deg. 0' 00" E. 414.00 feet to the Place of Beginning. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. zoning.stverak ~~ AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 1996 ORDINANCE 022796-12 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO DENTAL PROSTHETICS INC. TO ALLOW A DENTAL LABORATORY AT 2121 ELECTRIC ROAD (TAR MAP NO. 76.07-4-32), WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Dental Prosthetics Inc. has filed a petition to allow a dental laboratory to be located at 2121 Electric Road (Tax Map No. 76.07-4-32) in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on February 6, 1996; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on January 23, 1996; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on February 27, 1996. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to allow a dental laboratory to be located at 2121 Electric Road (Tax Map No. 76.07-4-32) in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1-456 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia., as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved with the following condition: (1) The maximum size of the dental lab shall not exceed 1700 square feet. On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt the ordinance and include condition that the maximum size of the dental lab shall not exceed 1 1700 feet, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. H ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 2 1 ~ -~ N, M ~ ~ iav T • ~"q Z WX e.:tsar--`~.~, ~s' a ~~ m7 `~ o~c ~ NCO 41j''. , _ 1 .. _- - _- , GR?NOIN RQ ~~ - ~ ~ S~ _ - _p. ~ . ~T y EN V Pt M .r ~~..{{ BR10 ~ _ ; A O • G ~ - ° ~ G~ R C f U ,rO Z 6 . fJF -+ ~o , AA ~~.,~ ~ 41 V~Ux 'y II ~ ,,~+~ ~ ,,0 n ~~ ~ ~~ ~: oR ~. i oEIH/.J OR p ~ p..c ~~ ~~ Ov« ~~-~ !~ NORTH 0rO is ~' C/ 1- ~PC QoGa ~ ~ .. - ~~ ~' 48}f • ' i ~c ago 1°b O ~ / ~ 'Fe fib` ' / ~\ / oho Z 100 /, ~ / i o,, ~ ~ ~o i ~~. ~ o Coy ~'~ ~ o~ s ° ~ - o``~pC ~ o a ~:.r ~~... ` CP~,~ \ \ ~ t~~ CMG G c+wM/ ~ / ~/y ? $ ~ ~ / 'y , s .i... r . r' t~ ~y~ A ~ x,... ws. a _ ,~} „ ~• . S//J 5 a - ,o w ' 1120 ' rx ~ ,~ 8 v ~ I - i/21 ' , ~JJZe 6 • °S a /~ - e /'C~~s/J~ ' =11c J u ' _ 7 _ e _ c J/JS ' ~ n II ~ 2 ` ~ ~~' ~o / / J+sO o` s ua3. -~ ~ ~~ ~ Jn _ 8 a a, I 9 ~ _ 25 2102 10 0 _ 1/10 ~"w 8 ~~~ •z 1/2~ 2/01 \ ~~ h pop ,7 ~ II zlu \ . iiZ ~~ ._ q` 10 zJ21 „~„ ~o,. _ ~ / 'l~~ ~~ SC2l ~o ~~ qo'` ~ 17 Off, 11172 .r.= ~r .~ O ` 7~ 9 ~i~ ?2. 120J~ ~ yo ~ `~ j b i1u r _ 'r. ~~ ~ ~ . ~ / zz~o ;! +. \ "a ~~ DENTAL PROSTHETICS - SPECIAL USE PERMIT "t DEPARTMFNr OF PLANNZ\G A1~rD zoNZrrG 76.07-4-32 .~ . ~ 3 PETITIONER: DENTAL PROSTHETICS INC. CASE NUMBER: 5-Z/96 Planning Commission Hearing Date: February 6, 1996 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: February 27, 1996 A. REQUEST Petition of Dental Prosthetics Inc. for a Special Use Permit to allow a dental laboratory at 2121 Electric Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS Grant Clatterbuck, partner in the office park, spoke in support of the request. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Commission inquired about the size of the proposed dental lab. Staff responded that initially the applicant will occupy 850 square feet with the possibility of expanding to 1,700 square feet. D. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS None. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Thomason moved to recommend approval of the request to allow a dental lab in an area up to 1,700 square feet. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Witt, Hooker, Robinson, Ross, Thomason NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map Staff Report _ Other ~. ~" / _._i'` Terrance H ngton, ecretary Roanok ounty Pl g Commission J•3 • STAFF REPORT PART I PETITION: Dental Prosthetics, Inc. PREPARED BY: Jon Hartley FILE NO.: 5-2/96 DATE PREPARED: January 30, 1996 A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A dental laboratory, Dental Prosthetics, Inc., which manufactures dental prosthetic devices, is proposing to occupy part of an existing office building at 2121 Electric Road. This use should not effect the surrounding property or the public services associated with this property. B. DESCRIPTION Dental Prosthetics, Inc. is requesting a Special Use Permit to operate a dental laboratory at Oak Grove Office Park located at 2121 Electric Road in the Windsor Hills magisterial district. The dental lab would initially occupy approximately 850 square feet in one of the three existing office buildings with the potential to double in size in the future. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Section 30-53-2 (B) allows Laboratories in the C-1, Office district only after a special use permit is approved by the Board of Supervisors. Uses included as laboratories are engineering and environmental labs, medical. optical, dental and forensic labs, x-ray services, and pharmaceutical labs involved in research and development. As an existing developed site, no special reviews or approvals will be necessary beyond building and occupancy permits. • V'3 • PART I I A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS The property contains three office buildings with 24,756 square feet of office space, along with a branch bank (with drive through) and 36 apartments (with pool) on 3.67 acres at the intersection of Electric Road and Carriage Lane. The property is flat with additional space for further development. Access is available from two entrances onto Electric Road or two entrances from Carriage Lane. The property in question is surrounded by high density residential and commercial development to the north, east and west. Adjoining the property to the south are single family residences. B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The proposed dental laboratory would be located in an existing office building occupying initially 850 square feet with the potential to double in size in the future. The lab would employ six people in the preparation and manufacture of dental prosthetic devices for dental practitioners in the surrounding area. According to the applicant, unlike other facilities that fall under this laboratory use type category (medical, forensic or pharmaceutical labs), a modern dental lab generates no toxic or hazardous materials or waste products. PART III • STAFF CONCLUSIONS The proposed use will occupy space in an existing structure and will have no greater impact on the surrounding uses or public facilities than those uses which have historically occupied this structure. 2 ~ ~ - .~- L Z ~- 1833 r~ For star"; use cnly COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 5204_ Bernard Dr. _ - P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 1 54d 772-toss FAx c 54d •772-2,08 d~ ~jv~ ; receive C / ~I application f~~~ ((,, PCiB~ a e: J n / p i s :/~ r 005 date: Case Nu ,ber: ~,~ Check type of application filed (check all that ~YpIy): ~ REZONING ~ PECIAL USE OVARIANCE Applicant's name: '~Erv-s/~.~ ~Res~ryt~-r~~-s 5--~ ~- Phone: 3~E-S ~`t'I Address: 1'j 34 rr-Er., o~e,~~sc.. A.J'E ~ Zip Code: o .•r ic.~ ~/ Z. ~Fe r C J A e.1L S w- • r~ Owner's name: ~. ~,,~ Ems- t,, ~,.~p Pty PerzT ~ E s Phone: Address: Zip Code: Location of property: Tax Map Number: "'i (P ~ ~ Z --~ ~ ~- t ~~ E'~,6.~~rR..`r (Lfl P.7agisteriaJ District: ~.,.: ~ ..~ - s ,~ l~ . ~~ 5 Qoh~dY~ ~ ~ Community Planning Area: l,s ~ .s S -..._ . ~.r.. S Size of parcel (s): 3 . L~ acres 85o sq.ft. Existing Zoning: G1 Existing Land Use: _ ;~: . t:--. . i Proposed Zoning: ~ Proposed Land Use: ~~-~-'['n.~-- ~-~ ~o ~'r0 ~ For Staff Use Only Use Type: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES / NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. / Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria fcr t..=_ requested Use Type? YES / NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffer=~ with this request? YES NO :'t ~':: Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order tc: APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF ws v ws v J Consultation / 8 1 /2" x 1 1' concept plan ~ ~ Application '=`4< 1~letes and bounds description J ~ Justification / '~`~`. Water and sever application Is the application complete? Please check if enclcsed THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v Application fee ,/ >-"~ Proffers, if applicable Adjoiriirig property owners l hereby certify that l am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner. Owner's Signature: B ••G.Jc- w,• ra ~ ~'~~ ~»4Q ~ /z,/ ~~ ~ ,'~ GP. • ~ ,. ~~ ~ent~! ~rost~ret~es, inc. _ - _ ~ - Dece-n~`er 2nd. 1595 ounty of Roancl;e Department of Flanr.ing and 2onina ~~04 Bernard Dr. O. Box ?4t~18 ''^anol:e, VA X4018 Dear Sirs: We are a Dental Laboratory presently operating in the City of Roanoke. We re interested in relocating to a facility located at 2121 Electric Road, S'rl, ~`anoke, VA 2411°. Currently the p-rope-rty is zoned C-1. We ar•e requesting a aecial Use permit to occupy approximately 85© square feet with the possibility _f e:~panding within, the same building at a future date. Dental Prosthetics, Inc. mar,ufacture~ dental appliances, such as dentures, :als, and crown and bridge Work. To tree best of our- knowledge, our' u ss conformer with the purpose of the 4onir,g Ordinance (Section, 3m-3). The use of this property as a dental laboratory in this general ~ommericial area, we believe conforms vith the policies contained in the :oanoke County Comprehensive Plan To the best of our knowledge our business would not impact the adjoining ~ocerties adversely. We have no emissions, no to:{ic waste or hazardous ^.eTicals. We ha~.~e si:~ employees who would drive to work, park in the pa•_^r.ir:c_; .t and drive ha;r.e after work, therefore not causinct e::ccss traffic in the r=a. 41e have r.o contact with the public, t},e-refore our business would riot e :_: ate any increase in traffic. Our business would riot impact put,lic ___ ._ces and fa-_~1_ties. including water/sewer. roads. ~chc:als, arks/recreation, or fire/rescue. ~h~ +IGt,I~ ci[;~7'~_.i3t2 yollr" C:on=id=`rd'~Crt in C~r'ar:tinC our rei:u~'.~t iu~ ct =~e~;al Use Pa,rl;tp for the property located at 2121 Electric Road. C. W., Jc.^. Jii C, Vt1 c~~VJ .L G. Sincerely. '~~~~ !~ .. ., Clyde J. Smith, C.•D. T..~. , . .. .... .. • President 1 736 Memorial Avenue, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia 2401 5 (703) 345-4941 ~~~ ~' ~~ • ~~ ~~ Y d _~ ~_~ t r Y °~ ~i C J J I° TYATER & SEWER S~VICE REQUEST -FORM _ - - - APPLI C_a ITT - I3v'FORM.ATION - - - - (Please Type or Print) ~.~ p COI~L.ETE IrATL2NG ~ pPI,ICANT : ~E.fT~-.~- C /te iTtk~-r1 ~-S ~-DDRES'S : ~ l 2 ~ E t~c~~-R.c `. P _ONE : 3 ~-S LE~i ~ ~ ~ 1~.~~ r.E V A Z~v ~ 8~ CW-NER: WEST w~.+,D ~RePBra~r.~ s F~DRESS: I PHO~tE . AGENT : -S ~it,A,,s -c C~~-rarTe~.~ca e.~L A~DRES S I ~ :ONE SITE 13v~'ORMATION DD4~LOPMENT NAME : C`~/~.K ~it.eyE O FFc c-E ~p ~_ I:CCAT I ON (FURNISH COPY OF MAP) : ~. ~'t. ~ E uec-~r~ ~- 20 MA.P PTO .. 'r Cv . O "~ A GREACE : ZONED : ~ 1 TOT~~ UNITS : TOTAL ~ ZOTS REQUESTED SERVICES WATER FACILITIES: COUNTY: / ~~~~'R FACILITIES : COUNTY: WELL: SEPTIC SYSTEM: S BUILDING TO BE SPRINKLED ? ~ FLOW REQUIRED ? DESCRIPTION OF WORK (Include any Speci-ic Questions}: SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT APPLICATION MUST BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY BEFORE ST CAN EE PROCESSED. ALL N_IGHLIGHTED SECTIONS MUST ~ COI~L~LETED OR THIS FORM WILL BE RETURNED. G.P.M, v-3 D NORTH ?~ Amy +y ~ ~ ~/ ~' / 1- i ~~ ~ \ / F \ •, ~ tort ~ ~. 3'~ / Pc, Q,o°a A i `~. \ X co ~ '~6`~,7 / \ / 7~ 2100 'LC O \ / / ~P /1 i ~ ,p o~. svP ~~ ~ o n.u / ~P /tG;~ gyp' 0 ~ ~ ~~~ ~ GO~~`~4 `O~ o'wN. ~.~srF~.s. ` CP cw, 2 .~ , 0 t i AN/..F ~~ _ o.... x ... ~ 16 \ i~~ ` 3 se. F RS Y ,, s N M. fin. o ~.,,.,, r . N m. n~ o.w R w of x,.r. ew.e. a f '' ass as 14 S ~~ 5 ai/s v ' Si20 ' 1 ~_ • ~~ N ~: o ~ np ' a _ 3/23 ~ ._~ 0 6 ~.~,.~ ~ ~ C .l30 ..! Z + c I ~ ~_ ~~] !7 ~o _ ~ 127 $ 8 f uas. -~ ~• tq _ ro ~, 9 -~ 2 s f - _ °_ ~~ 2102 10 ~ ~ 2 1l10 ~~• •s 2/21 1 ~oo,,j ~ \ ' Ills , zro/ ~ ~" h ~~0 9 ~~~ ~~ • ....... ~o,. 06 6 ?i ' ~O .u: O/ f~j +s V - C ~ ZZ `~ ~ ,.~ "i s~ DENTAL PROSTHETICS - SPECIAL USE PERMIT _ ~' * DEPARTMEN'T' OF PI.~INNING ]6.0]-4-32 A~~ID ZONING .; . ~~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 1996 ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO DENTAL PROSTHETICS INC. TO ALLOW A DENTAL LABORATORY AT 2121 ELECTRIC ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 76.07-4-32), WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Dental Prosthetics Inc. has filed a petition to allow a dental laboratory to be located at 2121 Electric Road (Tax Map No. 76.07-4-32) in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on February 6, 1996; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on January 23, 1996; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on February 27, 1996. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to allow a dental laboratory to be located at 2121 Electric Road (Tax Map No. 76.07-4-32) in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Compre- hensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1-456 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia. Zo~g.a~~t ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TIIESDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 1996 ORDINANCE 022796-13 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 1.40-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED 2032 HARDY ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 71.07-1-39) IN THE VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2C TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF I-2C WITH CONDITIONB UPON THE APPLICATION OF BEDFORD CONTINUOUS GUTTERING INC. WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on January 23, 1996, and the second reading and public hearing were held February 27, 1996; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on February 6, 1996; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 1.40 acres, as described herein, and located 2032 Hardy Road (Tax Map Number 71.07-1-39) in the Vinton Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of C-2C, General Commercial District, to the zoning classification of I-2C, Industrial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Bedford Continuous Guttering Inc. 3. That the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts: 1 E (1) There will be no outside storage of materials. (2) There will be no more than 3 trucks stored outside on this property. (3) The use of the property is limited to a "construction yard" for a gutter installation business. (4) An approximately 30' x 30' building can be constructed on this site. No other expansion of the existing facilities is permitted. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: 1.40 acres as shown on survey made for Frances W. Weaver by T. P. parker, CLS, dated October 26, 1979, new line added February 5, 1980; easements added March 10, 1986; which survey is recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 1233, page 1733. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. olton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney ~ '~` _ ~- NORTH ~ 0 e a u ~ ~e ~~o i`~` / ~9~,o~j .~ // 4x ~..~k ,,,, 3~ I C-2C TO I-2C -BEDFORD CONT. GUTTERI~ _ ~~ ~ DEPARTI~_NT OF PI1~Nr1IA'G Arm ZOrJING 71 .0 7-1- 3 9 .; . .,, 2sex ._~ . ' PETITIONER BEDFORD CONTINUOUS GUTTERING INC. CASE NUMBER 42/96 Planning Commission Hearing Date: February 6, 1996 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: February 27, 1996 v-~ A. REQUEST Petition of Bedford Continuous Guttering Inc. to rezone 1.40 acres from C-2C to I-2C to permit a contractors storage yard at 2032 Hardy Road, Vinton Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION In response to questions from the Commission, Mr. Natt responded as follows: the only fabrication done at the site is gutter elbows; the new building will be residential in appearance. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS 1) There will be no outside storage of materials; 2) There will be no more than 3 trucks stored outside on this property; 3) The use of the property is limited to a "construction yard" for a gutter installation business; 4) An approximately 30' x 30' building can be constructed on this site. No other expansion of the existing facilities is permitted. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Robinson justified his recommendation by citing the following reasons: there have been no complaints in five years; the affected property owners originally sold the land for this use; the lack of visibility from Hardy Road, no outside storage along with proffered conditions, and the residential appearance of the new building. He moved to recommend approval of the request with conditions. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Witt, Hooker, Robinson, Ross, Thomason NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map Staff Report _ Other Terrance H gto ecretary Roanoke ounty Tanning Commission STAFF REPORT ~1 s Case Number:-4-2/96 - Prepared by: Janet Scheid Applicant: Bedford Continuous Guttering, Inc. Date: February 6, 1996 PART I B. DESCRIPTION The petitioner is requesting that a portion of a 1.40 acre parcel of property be rezoned from C-2C to I-2C to accommodate a canstr.~zction yard. The remainder of the 1.40 acre parcelis zone3- R-1. The portion of the property that is currently zoned C-2C was rezoned_in 1985 with conditions that specifically stated it could only be used as a "distributorship for Snyder potato chips". The petitioner purchased this property in 1990 and located his gutter installation business there. The petitioner currently wants to construct a 30' x 30' office on this site and upon applying for . a building permit was informed that the site was not property zoned for the use. y C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS A construction yard is defined as: Establishments housing facilities of businesses primarily engaged in construction activities, including outside storage of materials and equipment. Typical uses are building contractor's yards. Construction yards require a Special Use Permit in the AV district and are permitted by right in the I-2 district with the following use and design standards: All materials stored on the premises overnight shall be placed in a storage yard. The storage yard shall be fully screened from surrounding views in accordance with Section 30-92, and shall be set back at least one hundred (100) feet from any adjoining residential district. A site plan may be required. In addition, stormwater management calculations will be required. • 1 PARTII ~"'~ A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS 1. Lot Area - The area to be rezoned is a portion of a 1.40 acre site, located in the Vinton Magisterial District. The site is relatively .flat and wooded. 2. Location and Access - The site is approximately 1/2 mile east of the Town of Vinton on the north side of Hardy Road. The site has no public street frontage. It is accessed off of Hardy Road (Rt. 634) via the commercial entrance to the adjoining convenience store. The petitioner's site is situated to the north and west of the LancerMart convenience store. 3. Surrounding Area - Two parcels of property fronting on Hardy Road are zoned C-2 and are commercial uses. The remainder of the surrounding properties are zoned R-1 and are single family detached residences. 4. Traffic Count - The traffic count on Hardy Road in 1994 was approximately 12,000 vehicles per day. B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 1. Use - Petitioner has been using this property for the past five years for a gutter installation business - a use not _..._ _ . perm~.~ted under the current zoning. Petitioner would like to continue this use and expand the existing facilities to accommodate a 900 square foot office building. 2. TrafficjCirculation - This site has_no ublic street fronts e. Petitioner states in his application that three rucks will be parked on this site. Staff does not anticipate that this use would~be a signs scant traffic generator. 3. Screening_/Bufferinct - If this property is rezoned to I-2 the Petitioner will be required to install Type E screening and buffering where the site adjoins R-1 zoning. •Two options would be available to the petitioner. They are: Option 1) 8 foot screening plus 35 foot buffer yard with large deciduous and large evergreen trees; or Option 2) 50 foot buffer yard plus large deciduous and large evergreen trees plus small evergreen trees and shrubs. 4. Public Services - Water and sewer is provided by.the Town of Vinton. • 3 V ~~ 5. Proffers - Petitioner has proffered the following conditions: 1. There_wil_l___be no outside storage of materials; _. ___ 2. The use of the property will be limited to a contractor's yard for a _guttering business; 3. There will be no alterations to the existing facility with the exception of the construction of an office approximately 30' x 30'. C. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This site lies on the border between the Development and Neighborhood Conservation land use designations. The proposed industrial use is not consistent with the guidelines and principles of either designaton._ Spec-fically~--tie use-woes not comply with --- ~_ _- Policy~NC=I~--Frotec~ residential neighborhoods from disruptive impacts of land use changes. The intent of this policy is to prevent the_encroachment__of incompatible land uses in established _- --- residential neighborhoods and to protect residential property values. The usis nom consistent with the Development designation which is intended to be where the bulk of new residential growth will be directed and a mix of housing types and residential densities are encouraged. PART III STAFF CONCLUSIONS If the Planning Commission chooses to recommend approval of this request, staff recommends the following proffers: 1. There will be no outside storage of materials; 2. There will be no more than 3 trucks stored outside on this property; ' 3. The use of the property is limited to a "construction yard" for a gutter installation business; 4. An approximately 30' x 30' building can be constructed on this site. No other expansion of the existing facilities is permitted.~- ~ ~ ~_J 3 r Z C • COUNTY OF RO^NOKE. DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 5204 Bernard Dr._ P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 ( 54d 772-2068 FAX (54d ,]]2-2108 a~J ~Z~Z~`~s~ Cam. c~ ;tf rite r, iv dater 'v c_rv_.. by. applicati n f /, ~ r~BZ~ CL placardsds issued: 005 data: Case Number: r /~/ Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPUCA T ION WILL NOT BE ACLtr i to it :;~~ ; yr THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v ws v - ws v Consultation 8 1 /2" x 1 1 " concept plan Application fee X Application X ~°' Metes and bounds description X `~:~ Proffers, if applicable X Justification '~`x~ Water and se~r~er application X Adjoining property owners /hereby certify that / am either the owner of the pope/ the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and co, sent o/ the ~ // ~ < .,~ r ~'` ~i Owner's Signature: ~ , ~ ~' _ - ~ 'r-ar Staf; Usr Only: Case Number ~ ~~ Applicant BEDFORD CONTINUOUS GUTTERING, INC. The Planning Commission will study rezoning and sr=vial use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the follo:ving questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional Brace if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. The subject property has been used for warehousing for a number of years. The existing zoning was placed there for a commercial potato chip distribution facility. The present owners pursha~Q~ *~~ ^roperty in 1990 and located their business on the property. The business is a guttering installation business. The property has been used for approximately five yars for this business. The owner now desires to construct a 30' x 30' office onto the building. It was only at this point that it was discovered that the zoning was not appropriate. Thus, the application for rezoning. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County comprehensive Plan. he rezoning will allow an existing warehouse to continue to be used. While it is admitted that this is a "construction yard", the owner will not have any outside storage except for a dumpster and three trucks will be located outside the building. Thus, with the proffers offered, it oes not appear to Tie inconsistent with the provisions of the zoning ordinance or the comprehensive plan. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. Since the existing facility will not be altered in any way, it is not expected to have any adverse effect on the adjoining neighborhood. ~~, ~ ~`~ ~- NORTH ~l 0 0 Q CE Q V ~ ~, /~~ ~~,,o o ~ ~~ =~~ r i C-2C TO I-2C -BEDFORD CONT. GUTTERING ~~ ~ .DEPARTMENT OF PL,ANiVIA'G AND ZONING 71.07-1-39 .~ . .,. 23e Ac /~ ~~ 1.%4C issue ai . v-4 IN RE: PETITION OF BEDFORD CONTINUOUS GUTTERING, INC. AMENDED PROFFERS The undersigned Owner does hereby voluntarily proffer the following conditions to be attached to the rezoning of the subject property from C-2C to I-2C: 1. There will be no outside storage of materials; 2. There will be no more than 3 trucks stored outside on this property; 3. The use of the property is limited to a "construction yard" for a gutter installation business; 4. An approximately 30' x 30' building can be constructed on this site. No other expansion of the existing facilities is permitted. Date: February 6, 1996 BEDFORD CONTINUOUS GUTTERING, INC. By ~ ~~~x,'D ~. O~ ~j Its ~~~,~/~ D N DELLS ~ OSTERHOUDT. FERGUSON, NATT,AHERON & AGEE ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW ROANDKE, VIRGINIA 24018-1699 ::\wp50\steph\bedford.Pro:sse02/08/96 v-y AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 1996 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 1.40-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED 2032 HARDY ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 71.07-1-39) IN THE VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2C TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF I-2C WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF BEDFORD CONTINUOUS GUTTERING INC. WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on January 23, 1996, and the second reading and public hearing were held February 27, 1996; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on February 6, 1996; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 1.40 acres, as described herein, and located 2032 Hardy Road (Tax Map Number 71.07-1-39) in the Vinton Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of C-2C, General Commercial District, to the zoning classification of I-2C, Industrial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Bedford Continuous Guttering Inc. 3. That the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts: (1) There will be no outside storage of materials. v-Y (2) There will be no more than 3 trucks stored outside on this property. (3) The use of the property is limited to a "construction yard" for a gutter installation business. (4) An approximately 30' x 30' building can be constructed on this site. No other expansion of the existing facilities is permitted. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: 1.40 acres as shown on survey made for Frances W. Weaver by T. P. parker, CLS, dated October 26, 1979, new line added February 5, 1980; easements added March 10, 1986; which survey is recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 1233, page 1733. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. zoning.bedford r l f AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 1996 ORDINANCE 022796-14 AMENDING AND REENACTING ORDINANCE 82592-12, THE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR ROANORE COUNTY, BY AMENDING SECTIONS 30-54-2 (A) 2 AND 30-54-2 (B) 1 TO ALLOW HALFWAY HOUSES ONLY BY SPECIAL USE PERMIT IN C-2, GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS WHEREAS, on August 25, 1992, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted Ordinance 82592-12 which enacted a new zoning ordinance for Roanoke County; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission for Roanoke County held its public hearing on this amendment on February 6, 1996, and recommended approval of the ordinance adopting these amendments to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia; and, WHEREAS, in the interest of public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice, the Board of Supervisors hereby amends certain provisions concerning placement of halfway houses in the various zoning districts of the County; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law, and that the first reading of this ordinance was held on January 23, 1996; and the second reading and public hearing will be held on February 27, 1996. BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the Zoning Ordinance for Roanoke County, adopted on August 25, 1992, be, and hereby is, amended and reenacted, as follows: 1. That Sections 30-54-2 (A) 2. and 30-54-2 (B) 1. be amended to read and provide as follows: 1 ARTICLE III. DISTRICT REGULATIONS Section 30-54-2. Permitted Uses (A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified, or more stringent standards are listed in Article IV. Use and Design Standards, for those specific uses. 2. Civic Uses Section 30-54-2. Permitted Uses (B) The following uses are allowed only by Special Use Permit pursuant to Section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified, or more stringent standards are listed in Article IV. Use and Design Standards, for those specific uses. 1. Civic Uses #~ ~ , 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 2 ORDINANCE 022796-14 AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE APPENDIX A OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Circuit Court G. O. Clemens, Judge, Roy B. Willett, Judge Clifford R. Weckstein, Judge Diane McQ. Strickland, Judge Richard C. Pattisall, Judge Robert P. Doherty, Jr., Judge Steven A. McGraw, Clerk Juvenile Domestic Joseph M. Clarke, Philip Trompeter, John B. Ferguson, Joseph P. Bounds, Ruth P. Bates, Cl~ Intake Counsellor Relations District Court II, Judge Judge Judge Judge irk General District Court John L. Apostolou, Judge George W. Harris, Judge William Broadhurst, Judge Vincent Lilley, Judge Theresa A. Childress, Clerk Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue Thomas C. Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue Bill Rand, Director, General Services Thomas S. Haislip, Director, Parks & Recreation Elaine Carver, Director, Procurement John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Magistrates Sherri Krantz/Betty Perry John H. Cease, Police Chief Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance O. Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Michael Lazzuri, Court Services Main Library Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, SW, Rke 24016 Roanoke County Code Book 3 .~ ~ 5 PETITIONER: ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION CASE NUMBER: 7-2/96 Planning Commission Hearing Date: February 6, 1996 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: February 27, 1996 A. REQUEST Petition of the Roanoke County Planning Commission to amend Sections 30-54-2(A)2 and 30-54-2(B)1 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance to allow halfway houses only by Special Use Permit in C-2 General Commercial Districts. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION Mr. Robinson and Mr. Thomason concurred with the proposed amendment based on the public's perception of halfway houses. Mr. Witt expressed reservations about the amendment because normally C-2 is an acceptable zoning district for halfway houses. He said that because of some sensitive C-2 areas, he will vote in favor of the petition. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS Not Applicable. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Thomason moved to recommend approval of the petition. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Witt, Hooker, Robinson, Ross, Thomason NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report _ Other Terrance Ha gton ecretary Roanoke unty Planning Commission i• v- s Roanoke County Department of Planning Memorandum r~ • TO: Planning Commission FROM: Terry Harrington Director of Planning DATE: January 24, 1996 RE: Proposal to Amend Sections 30-54-2(A) 2 and (B)1 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance to allow Halfway Houses only by Special Use in C-2 General Commercial Zoning Districts. Introduction The attached zoning ordinance amendment is a proposal to reclassify the land use type called HALFWAY HOUSE, from a permitted use by right to a permitted use by special use in C-2 General Commercial Zoning Districts. A Halfway House is defined as follows: HALFWAY HOIISE - An establishment providing accommodations, rehabilitation, counseling, and supervision to persons suffering from alcohol or drug addiction, to persons re- entering society after being released from a correctional facility or other institution, or to persons suffering from similar disorders. Under the provisions of our current ordinance, this type of land use is allowed by right only in C-2 zoning districts. It is not allowed in any other zoning district. Modification of the ordinance would keep the C-2 limitation, but would require a special use permit. Reasons For Proposing the Amendment Over the past six months, the staff has received several inquiries from real estate agents and private firms involved in the development and operation of halfway houses. There apparently is interest in establishing one or more halfway houses within the Roanoke area. Several known sites have been evaluated as possible locations. All of the known sites evaluated have been zoned C-2 , Some are located in areas characterized by commercial and industrial land uses, while others have been located in areas r~ G~. ~- 5 (zoned C-2) yet characterized by residential development. The by • right designation allows halfway houses (and any other by right land use)- to located-within C-2 districts with few limitations on the size, nature or location of the proposed land use. Section 30-19 (B) of the zoning ordinance defines "special uses", and states in part: (B) This category of uses known as special uses is established in recognition that in addition to uses permitted by right, certain uses may, depending upon their scale, design, location, and conditions imposed by the Board, be compatible with existing and future uses in a district. Based upon our evaluation of the code, and the fact that this type of land use may or may not be compatible in a certain location, the staff recommends that the Commission consider this amendment, and recommend reclassifying halfway houses as a special use in C-2 districts. • i• ~- 5 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 1996 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING ORDINANCE 82592-12, THE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR ROANORE COUNTY, BY AMENDING SECTIONS 30-54-2 (A) 2 AND 30-54-2 (B) 1 TO ALLOW IiALFWAY HOOSES ONLY BY SPECIAL IISE PERMIT IN C-2, GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICTB WHEREAS, on August 25, 1992, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted Ordinance 82592-12 which enacted a new zoning ordinance for Roanoke County; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission for Roanoke County will hold its public hearing on this amendment on February 6, 1996, and will make a recommendation concerning approval of the ordinance adopting these amendments to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia; and, WHEREAS, in the interest of public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice, the Board of Supervisors hereby amends certain provisions concerning placement of halfway houses in the various zoning districts of the County; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law, and that the first reading of this ordinance was held on January 23, 1996; and the second reading and public hearing will be held on February 27, 1996. BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the Zoning Ordinance for Roanoke County, adopted on August 25, 1992, be, and hereby is, amended and reenacted, as follows: 1. That Sections 30-54-2 (A) 2. and 30-54-2 (B) 1. be 1 V-5 amended to read and provide as follows: ARTICLE III. DISTRICT REGULATIONS Section 30-54-2. Permitted Uses (A) The following uses are permitted by right subject to all other applicable requirements contained in this ordinance. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified, or more stringent standards are listed in Article IV. Use and Design Standards, for those specific uses. 2. Civic Uses Section 30-54-2. Permitted Uses (B) The following uses are allowed only by Special Use Permit pursuant to Section 30-19. An asterisk (*) indicates additional, modified, or more stringent standards are listed in Article IV. Use and Design Standards, for those specific uses. 1. Civic Uses ................................................. 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. Zoning.halfway.ord 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ V AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 1996 ORDINANCE 022796-15 TO VACATE PORTIONS OF A 10' WATERLINE EASEMENT AND A 20' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT ACROSS PROPERTY OF R. 8. DICRSON & COMPANY, DBA RUDDICR INVESTMENT COMPANY, LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF BRAMBLETON AVENUE AND COLONIAL AVENUE WHEREAS, by deed of easement dated October 30, 1973, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 984, page 439, Mick-or-Mack Stores Co., Inc., as owner of the subject parcel of land, conveyed a sewer line easement twenty feet (20') in width to the Roanoke County Public Service Authority (predecessor to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County); and, WHEREAS, by deed of easement dated March 15, 1979, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 1119, page 123, Mick-or-Mack Stores Co., Incorporated conveyed a waterline easement ten feet (10') in width to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County; and, WHEREAS, the petitioner, R. S. Dickson & Company, dba Ruddick Investment Company (Ruddick), is the current owner and developer of the parcel of land over which the above-described easements are located, said parcel being located at the intersection of Brambleton Avenue and Colonial Avenue, and being designated on the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map No. 86.08-1-4; and, WHEREAS, Ruddick has requested that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, vacate portions of the above-described 10' waterline easement and 20' sanitary sewer easement to ,~ facilitate development of the property, and in exchange, Ruddick is to convey alternative easements to the Board of Supervisors; and, WHEREAS, the proposed new easements meet the requirements of the affected County departments and the relocation will allow for the provision of equivalent service. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance. A first reading of this ordinance was held on February 13, 1996; and a second reading was held on February 27, 1996; and, 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject real estate (portions of easements) are hereby declared to be surplus and the nature of the interests in real estate render them unavailable for other public uses; and, 3. That, subject to the following conditions, a portion of the 10' waterline easement across property of R. S. Dickson & Company, dba Ruddick Investment Company, located at the intersection of Brambleton Avenue and Colonial Avenue in the Cave Spring Magisterial District of Roanoke County, cross-hatched and designated as "10' WATER LINE EASEMENT D.B. 1119, PG. 123 TO BE VACATED" on the 'Plat Showing "Exhibit A" A Portion Of A 10' Water Line Easement (D.B. 1119, Pg. 123) To Be Vacated Located On Parcel 2 rt 2-A,' dated 25 October 1995, a copy of which is attached hereto, be, and hereby is, vacated; and, 4. That, subject to the following conditions, a portion of the 20' sanitary sewer easement across property of R. S. Dickson & Company, dba Ruddick Investment Company, located at the intersection of Brambleton Avenue and Colonial Avenue in the Cave Spring Magisterial District of Roanoke County, cross-hatched and designated as "20' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT D.B. 984, PG. 439 TO BE VACATED" on the 'Plat Showing "Exhibit C" Sanitary Sewer Easement (D.B. 984, Pg. 439) To Be Vacated Located On Parcel 2-A,' dated 8 February 1996, a copy of which is attached hereto, be, and hereby is, vacated; and, 5. That, in exchange, the proposed alternative easements as approved by Roanoke County shall be granted to the Board of Supervisors; and, 6. That, as a condition to the adoption of this ordinance, R. S. Dickson & Company, dba Ruddick Investment Company shall be responsible for relocation of the water and sewer lines, which must be acceptable to and approved by Roanoke County upon completion, and shall be responsible for all costs and expenses associated herewith, including but not limited to, vacation of the easements, conveyance of the alternative easements, recordation of documents, surveys, and relocation of lines; and, 7. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to 3 A accomplish this vacation and associated acquisitions, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. H lton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning John W. Birckhead, Acting Director, Real Estate Assessment Vickie L. Huffman, Assistant County Attorney 4 h O / ~~ ~ ~.! G ~~ ~ ryry, 1 ~~ ~ ~ ' Ei LIN ~~ ~ ,`p WATER LINE / 10 EASEMENT A ~i ,OR'~`~ ~ D.B. 1119. PG. i23 g_ C_ ° ` ~ h~ ° J 20' SANITARY S EWER hry ,,'1 EASEMENT D.B. 984, PG. 439 ~-' PARCEL 2-A TO BE VACATED . ss~ sAr~rARr SEWER LwE :~ STOR11 DRAM LINE -- M- MATER LINE 4PC0 AND C&P TELEPHONE ®~ S70RY ~~ ~T UTILITY EASEMENT (SEE NOTE ~3) ® SAMTARY SEINER YANFM ~ ~ ` ® MATER YA!lFiQ.E \ ~ ~ Q STORY ORANV YANkOLE PROPERTY OF _ _ _ - R.S. OIGKSON A COMPANY ss -- '-^ 08A I RLIDDICK INVESTMENT COMPANY, -~i- - _ _ = A NORTH CAROLINA CORPORATION D.6. 1489, PG. SO _ _ `` - _ -' TAX /Qa.08-I-4 / L10' STORMDR AIN ~ EASEMEN T ~pE~p / D.B. 915. PG. 760 - GoNG~TE ~B ~--5' TO CENTERLINE CdiCTIETE CURB t Cur -10' WATER LINE EASE-~ENT ~ MATER VALVE D.B. 1119, PG. 123 FIRE NYDRANt DENOTES EASEYErIi TO ~ VACATED NOTEB~ 1. THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT. OF A CURRENT TITLE REPORT AND THERE MAY EXIST ENCUTABRANCES NOT SHOWN HEREON. 2, TNiS PLAT IS FOR THE PURPOSE OF VACATING A WATER LINE EASEMENT AS SHOWN HEREON I AND GOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACTUAL BOUNDARY SURVEY, 3. SEE V.D.O.T. PLANS PROJECT 0221-080-107, SHEETS 6 ~c 66 FOR APCO, Cdd~ AND D'RaNAGE EASEMENTS. ~'-g~a 0~ ~~ y ~A Ut,~.2°~~9ff ~~ TIMOTHY ~ d~ ~~ (,~ PLAT SHOWING "EXHIBIT A" A PORTION CF A 10' WATER LINE EASEMENT (D.B. ~~~9, PC. 123} ; TO BE VACATED LOCATED ON PARCEL 2-A PROPERTY OF R.S. DICKSON & COMPANY DBA RUUDICK INVESTMENT COMPANY, A NORTH CAROLINA CORPORATION (D.B. 1489, PG. SO) CAPE SPRING MAgSTERIAL DISTRICT ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA SCALE 1" n 40' DA7E: 25 OCTOBER 1495 LUK80&M A880ClA1'ES, P,C. ENGINEERS-SURVErORS-PLANNERS J~ ,~? 1 '~~v~`O ~~~ ~ ~~ J~ ;.8 z ~P / ExISr.NG '~~ 1 STGRY ~ ~ ~0 MASONRY BLDG. V °ol 0~ ~ ~ '~ ~ 20' SANITARY SEWER ± EASEMENT o ~ 0.8. 984, PG. 439 ~ m 20' SANITARY 10'WATER LINE i0 BE VACATED EWER EASEMENT EASEMENT ~ D.B. 1119, PG. 123 4 D.B. 783, PG. 522 10' TO ~~ EXIST. DRAINAGE 10~ $TORMDRAIN~ 17.72' EASEMENT EASEMENT PARCEL 2-A ~ IP PE (SEE NOTE #3) D.B. 915, PG. 760 PROPERTY OF ^°o;` W R.S. OICKSON & COMPANY ~, DBA a TAX # 86.08-1-1 N• RUDDICK INVESTMENT COMPANY, °~ PROPERTY OF v~ °' ~ r•, GENE A. BOWLES sr ~ A NORTH COROLINA CORPORATION AND ~o\ ~ (D.B. 1489, PG. 50) CALLIE R. BOWLES i DRAINAGE EASEMENT TAX y86.08-1-4 D.B. 1474, PG. 1546 (SEE NOTE #3) APCO UTILITY EASEMENT co I ~ - _ _(SEE NOTE #3) , APCO AND C&P N`32'OO" N, '- - - °- TELEPHONE UTILITY EASEMENT ~110.os' I ~ - (SEE NOTE /3) - - 0 00 ~rn orn o!~ ao~ c0 °~zQo W ~ O ~Qr~ Fa .O O 1 O CENTERLINE DATA EASEMENT TO BE VACATED LINE DIRECTION DISTANCE A-B N87'28'12"E 360.93' B-4 $86'02'55"E 164.12' COLONIAL A VE (R/1V VARIES) NUE V A' R rE• 1Y687 LEGEND = CONCRETE CURB o STORM DRAIN UNE CONCRETE CURB de GUTTER -W- WATER LINE wv ~ ~ STORM GRAIN INLET pQ WATER VALVE QS SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE '~ FIRE HYDRANT ® WATER MANHOLE = 55= SANITARY SEWER LINE ® STORM DRAIN MANHOLE ® DENOTES EASEA~EN T TO BE VACATED NOTES 1. THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A CURRENT TITLE REPORT AND THERE MAY EXIST ENCUMBRANCES NOT SHOWN HEREON. 2. THIS PLAT IS FOR THE PURPOSE OF VACATING A SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT AS SHOWN HEREON AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACTUAL BOUNDARY SURVEY. 3. SEE V. D.O. T. PLANS PROJECT 0221-080-107, SHEETS 6 & 68 FOR APCO, CdcP AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTS. PLAT SHOWING "EXHIBIT C" SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT (D.B. 984, PG. 439) TO BE VACATED LOCATED ON PARCEL 2-A PROPERTY OF R.S. DICKSON & COMPANY DBA RUDDICK INVESTMENT CO., A NORTH CAROLINA CORPORATION (D.B. 1489, PG. 50) CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA SCALE 1" = 100' DATE: 8 FEBRUARY 1996 LUY8DEN A880CIATE8, P.C. ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS-PLANNERS .. ROANOKE, Y180MA `~P" _ ~ Z~g/qL f~~ TIMOTHY ~0 Z y l u.' 4 ~ v-~ ACTION NO. ~ /, ITEM NO. Y AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 27, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE TO VACATE PORTIONS OF A 10' WATERLINE EASEMENT AND A 20' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT ACROSS PROPERTY OF R. S. DICKSON & COMPANY, DBA RUDDICK INVESTMENT COMPANY, LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF BRAMBLETON AVENUE AND COLONIAL AVENUE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This is the second reading of the proposed ordinance to authorize vacation of portions of a 10' waterline easement and a 20' sanitary sewer easement across property owned by R. S. Dickson & Company, dba Ruddick Investment Company, located at the intersection of Brambleton Avenue and Colonial Avenue in the Cave Spring Magisterial District of Roanoke County, Virginia. BACKGROUND' By deed of easement dated October 30, 1973, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 984, page 439, Mick-or-Mack Stores Co., Inc., as owner of the subject parcel of land, conveyed a sewer line easement twenty feet (20') in width to the Roanoke County Public Service Authority (predecessor to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County). By deed of easement dated March 15, 1979, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 1119, page 123, Mick-or-Mack Stores Co., Incorporated conveyed a waterline easement ten feet (10') in width to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The petitioner, R. S. Dickson & Company, dba Ruddick Investment Company (Ruddick), is the current owner of the parcel of land over which the above-described easements are located, said v-L parcel being located at the intersection of Brambleton Avenue and Colonial Avenue, and being designated on the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map No. 86.08-1-4. Ruddick has requested that the Board of Supervisors vacate portions of the easement to facilitate development of the property. In exchange, and in accordance with the site plan submitted to and approved by Roanoke County, alternative easements are to be granted to the Board of Supervisors. The proposed new easements meet the requirements of the affected County departments and allow for the provision of equivalent services. Ruddick shall be responsible for relocation of the water and sewer lines and all costs associated therewith, and the utilities must be accepted upon completion by Roanoke County. The portion of the 10' waterline easement to be vacated is cross-hatched and designated as "10' WATER LINE EASEMENT D.B. 1119, PG. 123 TO BE VACATED" on the 'Plat Showing "Exhibit A" A Portion Of A 10' Water Line Easement (D.B. 1119, Pg. 123) To Be Vacated Located On Parcel 2-A,' dated 25 October 1995, a copy of which is attached to the proposed ordinance. The portion of the 20' sanitary sewer easement to be vacated is cross-hatched and designated as "20' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT D.B. 984, PG. 439 TO BE VACATED" on the 'Plat Showing "Exhibit C" Sanitary Sewer Easement (D.B. 984, Pg. 439) To Be Vacated Located On Parcel 2-A,' dated 8 February 1996, a copy of which is attached to the proposed ordinance. FISCAL IMPACTS• None STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt the proposed ordinance to authorize vacation of portions of the 10' waterline easement and the 20' sanitary sewer easement across property owned by R. S. Dickson & Company, dba Ruddick Investment Company, located at the intersection of Brambleton Avenue and Colonial Avenue, subject to the conditions specified herein. Respectfully submitted, ~~. ~ Vi ki L. Huf an Assistant Coun y Attorney 2 v-~ Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Vote No Yes Abs Eddy Harrison Johnson Minnix Nickens 3 ^ 0 ~~~ ~° k~ ~o 0 d y .~ PARCEL 2-A TO BE VACATED . ~~ SAN+tAftr sEwER LwE PROPERTY OF _ ~ - - - R.S. OICKSON A COMPANY s --! ~ D@A s RLIDOICK INVESTMENT COMPANY, = ~- _ _ _ = A NORTH CAROLINA CORPORATION D.B. 1489, PG. SO _ _ - ~ - - TAX /86.08-1-4 ~ 10' STORMDR AIN ~ EASEMENT ~pE~p ~ D.B. 915, PG. 760 CoNCJ~tE CI~e ~--5' TO CENTERLINE ~ coNCxETE CURB r cuT -10' WATER LINE ~ WATER vALVE EASEMENT D.B. 1119, PG. 123 FIRE HYDRANT AND C&P TELEPHONE .~. sTORY DRAIN LMIE -- w- WATER UHE ® [~' STORM DRABS WLET ® SMMTARY SEWER MANhN ® WATER MAHFtOLE © STORM ORArH MAN++OLE DENOTES EASEMENT TO ~ VACATED NOTEB~ 1. THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFlT.OF A CURRENT TITLE REPORT AND THERE MAY EX157 ENCUMBRANCES NOT SHOWN HEREON. 2, THIS PLAT IS FOR THE PURPOSE OF VACATING A WATER LINE EASEMENT AS SHOWN HEREON ANO DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACTUAL BOUNDARY SURVEY, 3. SF~E V.D.O.T. PLANS PROJECT 0221-OBO-107, SHEETS 6 ~ 66 FOR APCO, Cdel;' AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTS. PLAT SHOWING "EXHIBIT A" A PORTION OF A 10' WATER LINE EASEMENT (D.B. 1119, PC. 123} ; TO BE VACATED ' LOCATED ON PARCEL 2- A PROPERTY OF R.S. DICKSON & COMPANY DBA RUDDICK INVESTMENT COMP ANY, A NORTH CAROLINA CORPORATION (D.B. 1489, PG. 50) CAV£ SPRING MApSTERIAL DISTRICT ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA SCALE 1" n 40' DATE: 25 OCTOBER 1495 LLIfABDGN A880srlATlrS, P,C. ENO,NEERS-SURVEYORS-PLANNERS r ~ I ~ .~ i 1D' WATER LINE EASEMENT D.B. 1119, PG. 123 CENtERLINE DATA EA8EMENT TO BE VACATED LINE DIRECTION DISTANCE A-8 N 75'1508 E 40.78 B-C N 9'S8 E 81.28 C'0 N 09'3012 w 84.23 20' SANITARY SEWER ~- EASEMENT D.B. 9sa, PG. a39 0 ~~~~ o~ „~ Qtc~. ZOO/9~ ~~ ~ JJ TIMOTHY ~ ' 7 ~ ~ ,~ v-~ J4i ,~~ 0v~~o ~~~ 43. z tiP~ / EXISTING i ti~ 1 STORY ~ ~n 0~ MASONRY BLDG. a of ~'L' ~ a noS h ~ 20' SANITARY SEWER ± EASEMENT o ~ D.B. 984, PG. 439 g m 20' SANITARY ( 10'WATER LINE TO BE VACATED EWER EASEMENT EASEMENT ~ D.B. 1119, PG. 123 4 D.B. 783, PG. 522 _ z~z~~~ ---- ---- } ---- -+ to' TO ~{J - EXIST. DRAINAGE 10' STORMDRAIN~ 17,72' EASEMENT EASEMENT PARCEL 2-A ~ IRON (SEE NOTE /~3) D.B. 915, PG. 760 PROPERTY OF ~` PIPE ~., R.S. DICKSON & COMPANY ~, DBA s: TAX ~/ 86.08-1-1 N• RUDDICK INVESTMENT COMPANY, °~ PROPERTY OF u~ °f ~ GENE A. BOWLES a ~ A NORTH COROLINA CORPORATION ~ AND (D.B. 1489, PG. 50) CALLIE R. BOWLES o\ I TAX 86.08-1-4 DRAINAGE EASEMENT ~ D.B. 1474, PG. 1546 (SEE NOTE ~3) APCO UTILITY EASEMENT N I ~ - _ (SEE NOTE /{3) APCO ANO CdcP N 81'31'00• N, - - - °- TELEPHONE UTILITY EASEMENT ~110.na' ~ , (SEE NOTE /3) _ - - n 0 00 wrn orn o!~ N N Q O\ t0 ~ Z O W J ~ ~a~ ~a O O O CENTERLINE DATA EASEMENT TO BE VACATED LINE DIRECTION DISTANCE A-8 N87'28'12"E 360.93' B-4 S86'02'S5"E 164.12' COLONIAL AyE (R/w VARIES) NUE ~A. RTE. >~sa~ LEGEND = CONCRETE CURB o STORM DRAIN LINE - CONCRETE CURB dt GUTTER -W- WATER LINE •v ~ Q STORM DRAIN INLET pQ WATER VALVE O SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE FIRE HYDRANT ® WATER 1AANHOLE = 55= SANITARY SEWER LINE ® STORM DRAIN MANHOLE ® DENOTES EASEMENT TO BE VACATED NOTES t. THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A CURRENT TITLE REPORT AND THERE MAY EXIST ENCUMBRANCES NOT SHOWN HEREON. 2. THIS PLAT IS FOR THE PURPOSE OF VACATING A SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT AS SHOWN HEREON AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACTUAL BOUNDARY SURVEY. 3. SEE V. D.O. T, PLANS PROJECT 0221-080-107, SHEETS 6 & 66 FOR APCO, C&P AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTS. PLAT SHOWING "EXHIBIT C" SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT (D. B. 984, PG. 439) . TO BE VACATED o LOCATED ON PARCEL 2-A U PROPERTY OF R.S. DICKSON & COMPANY DBA RUDDICK INVESTMENT CO., A NORTH CAROLINA CORPORATION (D.B. 1489, PG. 50) CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA SCALE 1" = 100' DATE: B FEBRUARY 1996 LUMSDEN A880CIATE8, P.C. ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS-PLANNERS ROANOKE, YIRGIIpA ;,vi~g~9F ~~~~ r TIMOTHY •2.~ .~0 Z y l us' 4 V-~ V-L AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 1996 ORDINANCE TO VACATE PORTIONS OF A 10' WATERLINE EASEMENT AND A 20' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT ACROSS PROPERTY OF R. S. DICKSON & COMPANY, DBA RUDDICK INVESTMENT COMPANY, LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF BRAMBLETON AVENUE AND COLONIAL AVENUE WHEREAS, by deed of easement dated October 30, 1973, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 984, page 439, Mick-or-Mack Stores Co., Inc., as owner of the subject parcel of land, conveyed a sewer line easement twenty feet (20') in width to the Roanoke County Public Service Authority (predecessor to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County); and, WHEREAS, by deed of easement dated March 15, 1979, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 1119, page 123, Mick-or-Mack Stores Co., Incorporated conveyed a waterline easement ten feet (10') in width to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County; and, WHEREAS, the petitioner, R. S. Dickson & Company, dba Ruddick Investment Company (Ruddick), is the current owner and developer of the parcel of land over which the above-described easements are located, said parcel being located at the intersection of Brambleton Avenue and Colonial Avenue, and being designated on the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map No. 86.08-1-4; and, WHEREAS, Ruddick has requested that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, vacate portions of the above-described 10' waterline easement and 20' sanitary sewer easement to v-m facilitate development of the property, and in exchange, Ruddick is to convey alternative easements to the Board of Supervisors; and, WHEREAS, the proposed new easements meet the requirements of the affected County departments and the relocation will allow for the provision of equivalent service. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance. A first reading of this ordinance was held on February 13, 1996; and a second reading was held on February 27, 1996; and, 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject real estate (portions of easements) are hereby declared to be surplus and the nature of the interests in real estate render them unavailable for other public uses; and, 3. That, subject to the following conditions, a portion of the 10' waterline easement across property of R. S. Dickson & Company, dba Ruddick Investment Company, located at the intersection of Brambleton Avenue and Colonial Avenue in the Cave Spring Magisterial District of Roanoke County, cross-hatched and designated as "10' WATER LINE EASEMENT D.B. 1119, PG. 123 TO BE VACATED" on the 'Plat Showing "Exhibit A" A Portion Of A 10' Water Line Easement (D.B. 1119, Pg. 123) To Be Vacated Located On Parcel 2 V-f~ 2-A,' dated 25 October 1995, a copy of which is attached hereto, be, and hereby is, vacated; and, 4. That, subject to the following conditions, a portion of the 20' sanitary sewer easement across property of R. S. Dickson & Company, dba Ruddick Investment Company, located at the intersection of Brambleton Avenue and Colonial Avenue in the Cave Spring Magisterial District of Roanoke County, cross-hatched and designated as "20' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT D.B. 984, PG. 439 TO BE VACATED" on the 'Plat Showing "Exhibit C" Sanitary Sewer Easement (D.B. 984, Pg. 439) To Be Vacated Located On Parcel 2-A,' dated 8 February 1996, a copy of which is attached hereto, be, and hereby is, vacated; and, 5. That, in exchange, the proposed alternative easements as approved by Roanoke County shall be granted to the Board of Supervisors; and, 6. That, as a condition to the adoption of this ordinance, R. S. Dickson & Company, dba Ruddick Investment Company shall be responsible for relocation of the water and sewer lines, which must be acceptable to and approved by Roanoke County upon completion, and shall be responsible for all costs and expenses associated herewith, including but not limited to, vacation of the easements, conveyance of the alternative easements, recordation of documents, surveys, and relocation of lines; and, 7. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to 3 A . ~.V accomplish this vacation and associated acquisitions, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 4 U ~`~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 1996 ORDINANCE 022796-16 VACATING A PORTION (LOTS 16, 17, 18, AND 19) OF THE PLAT OF HIDDEN VALLEY SUBDIVISION (PLAT BOOR 3, PAGE 2 ) ACCESSED OFF INDIAN GRAVE ROAD IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Jeffrey W. Hodges and Cheryl A. Hodges, the petitioners, are the record owners of Lots 16, 17, 18, and 19, in the Hidden Valley Subdivision, located off of Indian Grave Road, in the Cave Spring Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke, Virginia; and, WHEREAS, said lots are designated and shown upon the "MAP OF HIDDEN VALLEY" dated Feb. 24, 1947, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Plat Book 3, page 2; and, WHEREAS, Petitioners have requested that Lots 16, 17, 18, and 19 of said subdivision plat be vacated; and, WHEREAS, §15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by §15.1-431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 13, 1996; the public hearing and second reading of this ordinance was held on February 27, 1996. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the portion designated and shown as Lots 16, 17, 18, and 19 of "MAP OF HIDDEN VALLEY" dated Feb. 24, 1947, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 3, page 2, said lots being referenced on the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map Nos. 98.01-1-38, 98.01-1-39, 98.01-1-40, and 98.01-1-41, respectively, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to Section 15.1-482(b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and, 2. That the Department of Engineering and Inspections shall record a certified copy of this ordinance with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, and all costs and expenses associated herewith, including but not limited to, publication costs, survey costs and recordation of documents, shall be the responsibility of the Petitioners, Jeffrey W. Hodges and Cheryl A. Hodges; and, 3. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. lton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning John W. Birckhead, Acting Director, Real Estate Assessment Vickie L. Huffman, Assistant County Attorney -i~OANOKE COUNT ROANOKE, VIRGINIA '~J -`~ ACTION # ITEM NUMBER V '•~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 27, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Request to vacate four lots of the Hidden Valley Subdivision accessed off Indian Grave Road and located in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~e c. O `n .n en ~ <d~P/d Uc-I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY• The petitioners, Mr. Jeffrey W. Hodges and Mrs. Cheryl A. Hodges, are requesting the Board of Supervisors to adopt the attached ordinance to vacate four lots of the Hidden Valley Subdivision. BACKGROUND• The petitioners, Mr. Jeffrey W. Hodges and Mrs. Cheryl A. Hodges, are requesting that the Board of Supervisors vacate four lots of the Hidden Valley Subdivision. Jeffrey W. and Cheryl A. Hodges are the owners of record of the four lots (#16,17,18,&19) in the Hidden Valley Subdivision, P.B. 3, Page 2. This subdivision is one that was platted in March 1947 and has a total of 28 lots divided between five members of the same family, including Jeffrey w. and Cheryl A. Hodges. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The petitioners, Mr. Jeffrey W. Hodges and Mrs. Cheryl A. Hodges, are requesting the vacation of a portion of the subdivision in order to allow for the installation of a double-wide manufactured home on the petitioner's property. Current Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance does not allow for the installation of a manufactured home in a platted subdivision. As a part of this subdivision vacation process, all current property owners within this subdivision have been contacted and have consented to this action. 1 SUMMARY: (continued) Therefore, Roanoke County four lots of the Hidden accordance with Chapter Virginia 1950, as amended ordinance. v-~ is requesting that the described Valley Subdivision be vacated in 17, Title 15.1-482(b), Code of by the adoption of the attached First reading of the proposed ordinance was held on February 13, 1996; a public hearing and second reading is scheduled for February 27, 1996. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: County staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt the proposed ordinance to vacate the referenced lots of the Hidden Valley Subdivision and instruct the County Attorney to prepare the necessary ordinance. ~BMITTED BY: ,. i ~'Arn ld Co ey, Dir ctor of Engineering & Ins ections APPROVED BY: lmer C. H ge County Administrator ACTION Approved ( ) Motion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To pc: Paul Mahoney, County Attorney VOTE Eddy Harrison Johnson Minnix Nickens No Yes Abs 2 r ~____..____._.~.,____.__ _ ___._._._~... --.___ __ . ROANOKE COUNTY v,, (' nnn~Tnu~ VTRrTNTA v-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 1996 ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION (LOTS 16, 17, 18, AND 19) OF THE PLAT OF HIDDEN VALLEY SUBDIVISION (PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 2) ACCESSED OFF INDIAN GRAVE ROAD IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Jeffrey W. Hodges and Cheryl A. Hodges, the petitioners, are the record owners of Lots 16, 17, 18, and 19, in the Hidden Valley Subdivision, located off of Indian Grave Road, in the Cave Spring Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke, Virginia; and, WHEREAS, said lots are designated and shown upon the "MAP OF HIDDEN VALLEY" dated Feb. 24, 1947, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Plat Book 3, page 2; and, WHEREAS, Petitioners have requested that Lots 16, 17, 18, and 19 of said subdivision plat be vacated; and, WHEREAS, §15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by §15.1-431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 13, 1996; the public hearing and second reading of this ordinance was held on February 27, 1996. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the portion designated and shown as Lots 16, 17, 18, and 19 of "MAP OF HIDDEN VALLEY" dated Feb. 24, 1947, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 3, page 2, said lots v-~ being referenced on the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map Nos. 98.01-1-38, 98.01-1-39, 98.01-1-40, and 98.01-1-41, respectively, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and, 2. That the Department of Engineering and Inspections shall record a certified copy of this ordinance with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, and all costs and expenses associated herewith, including but not limited to, publication costs, survey costs and recordation of documents, shall be the responsibility of the Petitioners, Jeffrey W. Hodges and Cheryl A. Hodges; and, 3. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. Y ~ ~ ~- ~,,, :. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COIINTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 1996 ORDINANCE 022796-17 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 11.47-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF OGDEN ROAD AT THE TERMINUS OF LESLIE LANE NORTH OF THE NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD TRACKS (TAX MAP NO. 77.19-1-1, 77.19-1-2, 77.19-1-3) IN THE CAVE BPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-3 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ROANORE COUNTY (ANGIE LAING) WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on November 21, 1995, and the second reading and public hearing were held December 12, 1995, and continued to February 27, 1996; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on December 5, 1995, and February 6, 1996; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 11.47 acres, as described herein, and located at the tenainus of Leslie Lane on the west side of Ogden Road north of the Norfolk Southern railroad tracks (Tax Map Number 77.19-1-1, 77.19-1-2, 77.19-1-3) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-3, Medium Density Multi-Family Residential District, to the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District. 1 ~_ 2. That this action is taken upon the application of The Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County (Angie Laing). 3. That the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions, which conditions the Board hereby accepts: 1) A natural vegetation buffer of 100 feet shall be retained and maintained in similar condition of the western boundary of the Angie Laing property extending from the center line of the natural water course to the northeast boundaries of the residential properties defined as Tax Map Parcels 77.19-2-47; 48; and 49; and to the eastern portion of 77.19-2-17.19. This buffer shall not preclude the future location of a storm water management area in the vicinity of the southeastern corner of the Angie Laing property and the Norfolk-Southern railway line if the same is required by Roanoke County during site development. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: 77.19-1-1 BEGINNING at a point on the north line of the railway right-of-way, 5 1/8 feet S. 66 deg. 25' E. of the center of a double white oak, marked at "A"; thence a new line, passing the white oak N. 66 deg. 25' W. 237.5 feet crossing a 15' farm road to a small black pine standing on the west side of a ditch at "2"; thence down the west side of ditch N. 43 deg. 55' W. 211 feet to a point in the branch at "3" on the old outside line; thence with the old outside line, down the branch N. 25 deg. 33' E. 195 feet to "4"; thence N. 18 deg. 33' E. 326.7 feet leaving the branch near the corner to a stone on the south side of same at "5"; thence with Hofawger's and others lands S. 74 deg. 54' E. 853.4 feet to a point on the north side of the said farm road at "6"; thence crossing the said farm road at S. 29 deg. 2' E. 313.5 feet to a stake on the north line of the railroad right-of-way at "7"; thence along the north line of the railroad right-of-way S. 74 deg. 28' W. 719.4 feet to "8"; thence a tangent curve 116 feet to the Place of Beginning, containing 9.45 acres. 77.19-1-2 2 BEGINNING at old Corner 3, the southwest corner of the 0.367 acre parcel, more or less, conveyed to Warren C. Laing, et ux., by Lottie R. Jamison, said Beginning Point on the northerly side of W. F. Lockett Road being about 204 years, more or less, westerly as measured along the northerly side of W. F. Lockett Road from the point of intersection of same and the westerly side of an old road, which intersection is about 1/10 mile northerly from Virginia Highway Route 681 and about 1/4 mile from Virginia Highway Route 119 ; thence leaving the Beginning Point and with the northerly side of W. F. Lockett Road approximately 15 feet northerly from the centerline of same, S. 78 deg. 04' 10" W. 88.50 feet to a new iron pin corner; thence with the three new lines across the Lottie R. Jamison (widow) original 11.364 acre tract, more or less, N. 45 deg. 14' 20" W. 48.06 feet to an iron pin at Corner 7; thence N. 20 deg. 38' 40" E. 123.48 feet to an iron pin at Corner 8; thence N. 36 deg. 23' 40" E. 92.17 feet to Corner 9, which is S. 36 deg. 23' 40" W. 0.50 feet from an iron pin reference point; thence with the southwesterly line of the T. R. Leslie property, S. 47 deg. 00' E. 66.01 feet to old Corner 5, which is S. 44 deg. 42' 20" W. 0.42 feet from an iron pin reference point; thence with the northwest side of the 0.367 acre Warren C. Laing property (formerly Lottie R. Jamison property) S. 44 deg. 42' 20" W. 112.53 feet to an iron pin at old Corner 4; thence S. 33 deg. 36' 40" E. 96.42 feet to an iron pin at Corner 3; the Place of Beginning, containing 0.337 acre, more or less. 77.19-1-3 BEGINNING at an iron pin at Corner 1 on the north side of W. F. Lockett Road at the southwest corner of T. R. Leslie property of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court for Roanoke County, said Beginning Point being approximately 155 yards from the northwest corner of intersection of Old Road and W. F. Lockett Road, said intersection being 0.1 mile north of Va. Hwy. Rt. 681; thence with the north side of W. F. Lockett Road, S. 55 deg. 00' 30" W. 40 feet to an iron pin at Corner 2; thence continuing with the same S. 71 deg. 09' 10" W. 108.52 feet to an iron pin at Corner 3; thence leaving W. F. Lockett Road and with two new lines through the property of Lottie R. Jamison, widow, (DB 255, Page 143) N. 33 deg. 36' 40" W. 96.42 feet to an iron pin at Corner 4, N. 44 deg. 42' 20" E. 112.53 feet to a point in the southwest line of T. R. Leslie property at Corner 5 where an iron pin is N. 44 deg. 42" 20" E. 0.42 feet from corner; thence with the southwest line of T. R. Leslie property S. 47 deg. 00' E. 149.97 feet to Corner 1, the Place of Beginning, containing 0.367 acre, more or less. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. H ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Timothy W. Gubala, Secretary, IDA 4 ~ 4 \ \\ C 'C:4 ~ / _ i ,~/~ mT ~ 4 ~~ I n.n ya. ~~ ~,,~t~ ` c~ A ..J .. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'~ , + I7.7 1a?aa o ~"~ yJ ~ ) aaraa~.^_ ,~~. \ , . ~~ y.• ~" y'' R~ ~,t ~~ na ~ ~ ' ~ •~ ~ s• ~-' RV a7 - df ~ =~ • SO t:7 ac ~S v 'dt ' ~~ ~ ti ~ ~ n.. .a ~ o _ ~ ~~ ,~' s+ ~ ~ ~ ~ P ~ :6 ,~~ 1 f r'I ~ !~. M ~* ,r V! ~e ~ ~ Ca• Cali. !~ ' •~ ~L6 ``~•r IS.D ~.oa ' ~ ~ .-l3~ ,~ T_.1 ~i?, 1 C.2 y ~ ~.'' q°r ~ a r e~ ~ ~4 a. iis.a r ~~. J' M l~ tsaa is ' ~ ~ ~~ ~C ~ ~ ~~ ~r ~ - .~c~~ r ..`r;_X:._ly~ r.. ~~ .- .. ~r;~, ~ ~~ mac`? ~~c ~ _~, ~~ ~ ~., ~,~ ~,~.. ~:=_< ~` Site name: l~ 1 ~- c `~ ~,, • ~; _ ; ` ,;~,~'• _( ~',~~ ~ =p~~ e C Tangiewood Mall area `a" ~;~;".-'~~ ~~~ro• ~-"~ ,• /1::~ ~~~"x~ia ,°xc~ i' ~' -Y~c ~" wc ='t-,?'` Angie L_a i ng _ I ~ ~ x^• `'s_~~~ r/`~'/,-=,~'--:= ~`~ `r`te /Sr°~ .`Co- -~1u ~ ~ ~I _J'~.~ :. P ~.i~i Cy.~ ~Fw ".\ : _ _4'i ~. i ~~ Tax Map Numbers: Request: 77.19-1-1 Rezone R-3 to C-?10.47 77.19-1-2 Rezone R-3 to C-2.5 (A) 77.19-1-3 Rezone R-3 to C-2.5 (A) _ ," PETITIONER: INDUSTRIAL DEVEIAPMEN"T AUTHORITY (ANGLE LAING) CASE NUMBER: 50-12/95 Planning Commission Hearing Date: December 5, 1995 and February 6, 1996 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: February 27, 1996 ~' ~ A. REQUEST Petition of Industrial Development Authority (Angie Laing) to rezone 11.47 acres from R 3 to C-2 to allow commercial uses, located on the west side of Ogden Road at the terminus of Leslie Lane, north of NS Railroad tracks, Cave Spring Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Commission expressed the following concerns: traffic (turning lanes, lack of a traffic light, narrow road); also, proposed uses have not been specified. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS 1) A natural vegetation buffer of 100 feet shall be retained and maintained in similar condition of the western boundary of the Angie Laing property extending from the center line of the natural water course to the northeast boundaries of the residential properties defined as tax map parcels 77.19-2-47; 48; and 49; and to the eastern portion of 77.19-2-17.19. This buffer shall not preclude the future location of a stormwater management area in the vicinity of the southeastern corner of the Angie Laing property and the Norfolk-Southern Railway line if the same is required by Roanoke County during site development. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Witt moved to recommend approval of the petition with the proffered condition. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Witt, Hooker, Robinson, Ross, Thomason NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACH~MEEN'TS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report _ Other ,. / i .~ -.~ Terrance Harringtor~ecretary Roanoke County Planning Commission v-~ IN RE: INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ROANOKE COUNTY PROFFERS The undersigned, Applicant and Property Owners, hereby voluntarily proffer the following condition relative to the rezoning of the subject property from R - 3 to C 2 1. A natural vegetation buffer of 100 feet shall be retained and maintained similar to its present condition on the western boundary of the Angie Laing property extending from the center line of the natural water course to the northeast boundaries of the residential properties defined as Tax Map Parcels 77.19 - 2- 47, 48 and 49, and to the eastern portion of 77.19-2-17.19 This buffer shall not preclude the future location of a stormwater management area in the vicinity of the southeastern corner of the Angie Laing property and the Norfolk -Southern Railway line if the same is required by Roanoke County during site development. ~ ' Angie Lai g G y , ~`.- Bill Branc Vice Chairman INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA V-B STAFF REPORT PETITIONER: IDA/ANGIE LAING CASE NUMBER: 5a-12J95 PART I A. EXECUTNE SUMMARY B. DESCRIPTION PREPARED BY: T1M BEARD DATE: DECEMBER 5, 1995 Petition of Industrial Development Authority (Angie Laing) to rezone 11.47 acres from R-3 to C-2 to allow commercial uses, located on the west side of Ogden Road at the terminus of Leslie Lane, north of NS Railroad tracks, Cave Spring Magisterial District. Future potential uses may include any permitted use in the C-2 district. No specific project details have been provided. Proffers related to screening and buffering and maintenance of existing vegetation along the west slope adjacent to the Green Valley community are under consideration. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS By right uses in C-2 include such varied retail uses as automobile dealerships and restaurants in addition to an array of office and civic uses and even limited residential, industrial and miscellaneous uses. Along with specific use and design standards, the complete range of ordinance regulations including building setbacks, height, building and lot coverage, signage, exterior lighting, screening and buffering, and parking will be applied. A commercial entrance permit will be required by the City of Roanoke. Site and building plans will be reviewed and approved by County staff before issuance of a building permit. • .. • 2 PART II ~ _ A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDfTIONS Location -The subject area is situated southwest of the Petroleum Marketers Inc. (PMI) property (former Ogden Senior Citizens Center) off Ogden Road. The property is in the Cave Spring Community Planning Area and urban services are available. TopoaraphyNegetation -The majority of subject area is flat excluding a gentle slope near the north boundary with Honeywood Apartments and a steep, densely .wooded hillside along the west and southwest border with the Green Valley neighborhood. Most of the predominantly flat area is grass-covered. Sparsely occurring evergreen and deciduous vegetation appears in the central part of the subject area. Surrounding Neighborhood -The subject property is zoned R-3 and includes one developed single family residential lot and two vacant parcels. To the south lie NS Railway tracks. On the north stand the Honeywood Apartments (zoned R-3). To the east a vacant tract and single family residential uses are found (zoned R-3) and on the west are Park/Open Space and the Green Valley residential community (zoned R-1). B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Access/Site Layout - No specific use has been proposed and no concept plan has been submitted. The only vehicular access from Ogden Road will continue to be via Leslie Lane (private drive). The County Attorney's office advises that any prospective developer(s) must acquire additional road width and upgrade Leslie Lane to VDOT acceptance standards. In conjunction with the sale of property to PMI, the southern tip of the PMI property near the Leslie Lane/Ogden Road intersection has been dedicated to Roanoke County for street purposes. The Engineering Department reports that stormwater management must be addressed and notes that a great deal of effort has recently been made to improve the Murray Run watershed immediately above the subject area. Murray Run has been identified as a potential greenway corridor by the Roanoke Valley Greenways/Open Space Steering Committee. The owner may want to consider some form of protection (a 30 to 40 foot wide easement is customary) along the stream for future greenway designation in addition to protecting existing vegetation on the west and southwest portions of the site. Another important consideration involves existing site grades which maybe raised to enhance the visibility of retail commercial occupants. Such an effort would require significant amounts of fill material which could reduce the effect of existing or proposed screening and buffering. v-B3 Traffic- Generation/Circulation -The 1994 ADT on i:his segment of Ogden Road was 10,31 o- vehicles per Roanoke City Traffic Engineering records. No accidents were reported in 1994 along this stretch from the city limits (north end of bridge over NS tracks) to the entrance at Windward. No traffic generation figures can be projected without more detailed information on specific proposed uses. Sight distance requirements may necessitate turn lane construction in addition to widening and paving the intersection area around Ogden Road <~nd Leslie Lane. Fire Rescue/Utilities -Emergency vehicle travel time is estimated at 4 to 8 minutes. Both public water and sanitary sewer can be extended from Ogden Road. C. CONFORMANCE WfTI-I COUNTY COMPREFiENSNE PLAN The petitioner's site is designated Park/Open SpacE~, Surface Water/Flood Hazard and Core by the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. Commerci<~I development is inconsistent with Park/Open Space, Surface Water/Flood Hazard guidelines or policies. The plan advocates protection of surface waters, drainage corridors, woodlands, and open space through effective run-off control, clustered development, minimal cut-and-fill operations, and vegetation preservation. The Core designation encourages mixed use .- urban development including both residential and commercial, coordinated commercial site design and separation, and screening and buffering against less intensive development. D. CONFORMANCE W~fH COUNTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD Site and building plans, erosion and sediment control and stormwater management plans must be reviewed and approved. No position can be taken on compliance with the zoning ordinance without submission of a basic concept plan. PART III STAFF CONCLUSIONS The applicant's request to rezone 11.47 acres from multifamily residential to general commercial without important background information has raised the possibility of serious negative impacts on surrounding, existing land uses including traffic access, final site grade(s), stormwater runoff in the Murray Run watershed, signage (little, if any public street frontage will be available) and ~-reservation of existing vegetation. The Commission should consider further study of this request to better determine the probable impacts; the most important of which may be access needs and options. L..J i• COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT . OF PLANNING ,^-,ND ZONING 3738 5ramcle:cn Ave. S'.'r' P.O. box 2°800 - - Rozr.oke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-20~i0 ~~ Fors;a~r-use only a.~ii a:ien fee: IPCi }.yhajt~,-+/~/„-i' '/gT// 7 ,,~,J ~ riacards issued: I3C5 d_:e: Case `ur^bcr: ~ /~ _.,,/ ry~ Check type of application filed (check all that apply): C REZONING ^ SPECIAL USE ^VARIANCE Applicant's name: Industrial Development authority of Roano'.<e County Fhone: (504) i i4- l t g r 1919 Electric Rd. , Roanoke, Va Zip Code: Address: P.O. Box 20068, . 24018 Owner's name: i f Phone: ' Address: See attached sheets ~~ . ~ ~~ Zip Code: Loc ion of prop y. Ta Map (Number: See attached sheets ~ / -. ' ' t ~~ 1~iagisterial District: See attached sheets ee s r n~ D~ ~ // Community Planning Area: ize of par eI ' Existi oning: ~,,~ See attached sheets (See ~ cres Existing Land Use: See attached sheets attachment~.ft. ::::s:~;::::::s: :::; i is ~ ~;; i::;=::::::: i~-~~:::, :i~~F~ r:-- - ~- ~•~~~` ~ ~ Proposed Zoning: See attached sheets ~! 5r stall Use o~iy Proposed Land Use:. See attached sheets Use Tyre: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage irequirements of the requested district? YES NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST . Does the parce! meet the minimum criteria for t`e r=quested Use Type? YES NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being pro~~ere~ v~ith this request? YE~ NO ..:.•~~•.i_..•.....••:......:•...:.•.••.~.~•'~' ~~ ... .~ ~:~~I`•~'~`~:~••:°~ ~~€''~~~~•:~€~~'''~~~='s'sus`'I":I"s~`~€=~~~`~'~'~i~l~I~'~I''sli''•~'~'~'~~`~'~` I'i~l~l'`'ICI'I':I~~`1~~~=~~'~~~~~~~~~'`''=~'~~~~~~' Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in orcer to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosi?d. APPLICA-i ION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v -~1 ws v R s ~ Consultation ~ ~ 8 1 /Z" x 1 1 ' concept plan Application fee Application '~ Metes and bounds description `'~ Proffers, if applicable Justification '~>: `later and sewer application Adjoining property owners • /hereby certify that / am either the owner of the property or the ~o~~ner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge~~d consent oft a owner. Owner's Signature: •'LGz~G~~ ~~ Edward A. Natc, Counse n uscria uavelu mCC ~+ ~ ~~~; - - ~f Roanoke County, Virginia ~~; L~ ~~~ 'J- • ~J i• SITE EVALUATION CRITERIA SITE NAME TAX ~1AP # MAGISTi:RIAL DISTRICT Angie Laing 77.19-1.1,2,3 Cave Spring SITE LOCATION West side of Ogden Road at end of Leslie Lane and north of NS Railroad tracks SITE SIZE EXISTING LAND USE EXISTING ZONING 11.47 acres Single family residences and vacant tract R3 PROPOSED ZONING C2 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION Park and open space WATER SERVICE 12-inch water line (City) in Ogden Road SEWER SERVICE 8-inch sewer at Ogden Road for PMI project ROAD ACCESS Access point at Ogden Road for Leslie Lane ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY COMMENTS 1992-94 Economic Development Strategy calls for rezoning of selected parcels in 419 corridor for commercial uses. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT RATIONALE FOR REZONING Rezoning needed to assemble parcels for proposed commercial site that can be marketed jointly with adjacent Stranna Arthur property. Market demand for C2 commercial property in Tanglewood Ma1U419 market area. PLANNING COMMITTEE/IDA SUBCOMMITTEE CONINIENTS RECOMMENDATION 10 . .C6p ~ ` G" .:. ~ ~\„~p=,.=. Site name: o~ '~ ~`,, .-.r cw- I . o ~• L j - ^~. ~~ = ',~~ ~ ~ 1., `>i e ~ Tanglewood Mall area ~ - ~~ ~c, ~._ . _ ~ - ~~ o ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' w~,,,.,~-~''` Angie Laing -t•',_S G ~~ ~ _ ~ ~ HiJR StNL ~l y,~ C, _ ~ _ <' 'P en K.ilry ~-.~_C.~*TD C'~ ``\` C7?SZT ~~_~~ ^N ~.a~r,'S. - ~ E .f ~~ ,~`qJ.~ ~ / ~~- _,E.}.~ ~ t?half CtQ,\~' ~ ~ . - - . \ ~. ~ . ~ 1 c. / ,~ mT ~ ~ // \ s •, ~:. 9G~ 't ,~ ~ `> y+~ ` ~ 17.9 ~' `\ y.+ ,;,,, ~ ~. y.• y~' ~~ Rb fit RZ<~ RE • ~ ' ~ r i. n~ I ,~ ~~1„: :a 4'~ ~ d' ~) ~ ~ , o ~ ~ ~ ` ~ - ~ ~~ ~j'S0 `,:' ~~ ~ • ti V .dt ~ n f ,~' / !~ '3 Q,o ai ~ v ~ N .~,~' ~ i C,o. cif 6 ~' . ~~•' • w / ! !7 - ~~ ~ C ~ +' 34 r ~a~ ~~ Ce• CaGi. i.o~ A ~ti; ' ~/~ .~'~ i t •?~• Q ~a n.•`: l\ s ~... >.\/ zsl ~ nw 4 t`r ~- rs ,,r ~z.. `es Tax Map Numbers: Request: 77.19-1-1 Rezone R-3 to C-210.47 77.19-1-2 Rezone R-3 to C-2.5 (A) 77.19-1-3 Rezone R-3 to C-2.5 (A) _ C i aa• C,,,t7 `1 ~~~lii-~ A ~~ ~/ vtRGiNIA,CNAR7ERED t882 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION TELEPHONE: (703) 981--2686. December 18, 1995 ~, ,. , .~ ~- Mr. Timothy W. Gubala Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County P. 0. Box 20068 Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Tim: This is in response to the questions listed in your letter to me dated December 11, 1995. 1. Ogden Road is not scheduled for improvements (such as widening) in the near future, nor is it listed as a priority in the recently adopted Roanoke Valley Area Long Range Transportation Plan (1995 - 2015). 2. Options for access to Ogden Road are certainly limited. Short of constructing a new bridge over the railroad that would connect this site to Fallowater Lane, the best point of access along existing frontage on Ogden Road appears to be the current access point at Leslie Lane. If access is-- -~t~r'Ioca ion as a comme 1 e th maximum width is 30 feet unless approve therwise. Another consideration might be to connec this site to Hone ood Lane to further improve chances i z a t i o n. -.LL-»~ __.__~-_ ..._~ 3. Considering the trip generation potential for this site, a right-turn deceleration lane and a left-turn storage lane would likely be needed, and would need to be sized accordingly with appropriate design criteria. (An acceleration lane would probably not be needed). A traffic analysis should be done to determine actual need once the particular development is identified. Additional engineering will also need to be done to determine feasibility due to physical constraints at this location (such as the adjacent bridge). 4. For signalization to occur, traffic signals must, at a minimum, meet one of the warrants for signalization which are identified in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. However, meeting a warrant does not require signalization. Additional engineering judgement would be needed to determine whether a traffic signal should be installed. With respect to this location, consideration 1802 Courtland Road, N.E. Roanoke, Virginia 2401 2 Timothy W. Gubala Page 2 _ December 18, 1995 would need to be given to how such a traffic s ignal could be interconnected with the adjacent signal at the Star Road--_ ~~tersection, which is maintained- ~y-~BO'I`. I 1 anticipate that if this entrance were to be signalized, i~ -t.~ie City would look to ot_ hPr~_---to Aa r P cns Let me know if you have any questions concerning this information. Sincerely, ~~`~' Robert K. Bengtson, P.E. Traffic Engineer RKB/gpe copy: William F. Clark, Director of Public Works John R. Marlles, Chief, Planning J. A. Echols, Resident Engineer, VDOT .~' ~ • t / ` '~lj //,, ~ Y/) Y /~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ { v ~~ ~v ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ /~' ~, ~ 17.1 l ' 17.2 ; .-,~,, .~,, ~ na r s n.4 .~ . r, ~, // .\ j ~ R1.418 " v 3 + ~9~~ • • i$ .azs QS~7.3 R.8 . 17.17 R7J ~~ , ~ 17.6 a R.I6 " Sy, ~ I7.18 17.10 ~e e M R.15 - ~i~~ y r' II "0 a 17.14' ~' ~~ . r+; ,~ 17.19 a ~ p'0 R. L3 '- ~ ~ w 9 ti +r~ ~ s 17.12 ~y`~~ 1 dpi ~ JJJO • 1720 .~ ~ ~~.,~ ~y~y. `~1~ ~yb= R ~ 17.27 ra 25~a ~ ~ ~o fT23 q ~ ~ ti N 47 ~~a •l 'y- ~ ~ / ~ °b 48 ~~ ~, ~~~ ova n, R. ~ 46 ° i °_ •` ,,°i! u 1 Off. b 8 : r i ~a:: ,~ i°b ti i.~, •y a ~, yy 29 F '_ syr '~b 4S .~ x~~y 49 '~~ ~ AJ ~~ to y ~~ / a a 9 a., Z 'r D 40 O ~, 41 ? n y •, ~ ~ ~ 54 yen' rh,~b Asa y•` Oy ~• 42 '~' Y r ', M ~ °y 7 ~n n ' - '~ ~ ti ` ~ ~~ ,e 56 d'i°~ 2e..~ j0~9 ~ • 237 `~~~~ 72 / ^ 5/ ''i'ce ~ a. ~t a6Oe '> M/ 34 iit . 71 /~ !i ete • ~ ~ x.06 At ~a ~ / .~ • / C:a C°bte J J~00 'o~^ O. V rai .t s° ~~ d ~~ - 1~ e~°'~„a~ ~~. e~~e'e' I~ /~ l ~gisc 9 I c lDlf ~'~`\\\~~ \ \\~ v~ P"P Q\' C .Q ~ ~v \~ ~-Y AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 1996 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 11.47-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF OGDEN ROAD AT THE TERMINUS OF LESLIE LANE NORTH OF THE NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD TRACKS (TAX MAP NO. 77.19-1-1, 77.19- 1-2, 11.19-1-3) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-3 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF THE INDIISTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AIITHORITY OF ROANORE COIINTY (ANGIE LAING) WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on November 21, 1995, and the second reading and public hearing were held December 12, 1995, and continued to February 27, 1996; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on December 5, 1995, and February 6, 1996; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 11.47 acres, as described herein, and located at the terminus of Leslie Lane on the west side of Ogden Road north of the Norfolk Southern railroad tracks (Tax Map Number 77.19-1-1, 77.19-1-2, 77.19-1-3) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-3, Medium Density Multi-Family Residential District, to the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of The V'8 Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County (Angie Laing). 3. That the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions, which conditions the Board hereby accepts: 1) A natural vegetation buffer of 100 feet shall be retained and maintained in similar condition of the western boundary of the Angie Laing property extending from the center line of the natural water course to the northeast boundaries of the residential properties defined as Tax Map Parcels 77.19-2-47; 48; and 49; and to the eastern portion of 77.19-2-17.19. This buffer shall not preclude the future location of a storm water management area in the vicinity of the southeastern corner of the Angie Laing property and the Norfolk-Southern railway line if the same is required by Roanoke County during site development. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: 77.19-1-1 BEGINNING at a point on the north line of the railway right-of-way, 5 1/8 feet S. 66 deg. 25' E. of the center of a double white oak, marked at "A"; thence a new line, passing the white oak N. 66 deg. 25' W. 237.5 feet crossing a 15' farm road to a small black pine standing on the west side of a ditch at "2"; thence down the west side of ditch N. 43 deg. 55' W. 211 feet to a point in the branch at "3" on the old outside line; thence with the old outside line, down the branch N. 25 deg. 33' E. 195 feet to "4"; thence N. 18 deg. 33' E. 326.7 feet leaving the branch near the corner to a stone on the south side of same at "5"; thence with Hofawger's and others lands S. 74 deg. 54' E. 853.4 feet to a point on the north side of the said farm road at "6"; thence crossing the said farm road at S. 29 deg. 2' E. 313.5 feet to a stake on the north line of the railroad right-of-way at "7"; thence along the north line of the railroad right-of-way S. 74 deg. 28' W. 719.4 feet to "8"; thence a tangent curve 116 feet to the Place of Beginning, containing 9.45 acres. 77.19-1-2 BEGINNING at old Corner 3, the southwest corner of the 0.367 acre parcel, more or less, conveyed to Warren C. Laing, et ux., by Lottie R. Jamison, said Beginning Point on the northerly side of W. F. Lockett Road being about 204 years, more or less, westerly as J-`~ measured along the northerly side of W. F. Lockett Road from the point of intersection of same and the westerly side of an old road, which intersection is about 1/10 mile northerly from Virginia Highway Route 681 and about 1/4 mile from Virginia Highway Route 119; thence leaving the Beginning Point and with the northerly side of W. F. Lockett Road approximately 15 feet northerly from the centerline of same, S. 78 deg. 04' 10" W. 88.50 feet to a new iron pin corner; thence with the three new lines across the Lottie R. Jamison (widow) original 11.364 acre tract, more or less, N. 45 deg. 14' 20" W. 48.06 feet to an iron pin at Corner 7; thence N. 20 deg. 38' 40" E. 123.48 feet to an iron pin at Corner 8; thence N. 36 deg. 23' 40" E. 92.17 feet to Corner 9, which is S. 36 deg. 23' 40" W. 0.50 feet from an iron pin reference point; thence with the southwesterly line of the T. R. Leslie property, S. 47 deg. 00' E. 66.01 feet to old Corner 5, which is S. 44 deg. 42' 20" W. 0.42 feet from an iron pin reference point; thence with the northwest side of the 0.367 acre Warren C. Laing property (formerly Lottie R. Jamison property) S. 44 deg. 42' 20" W. 112.53 feet to an iron pin at old Corner 4; thence S. 33 deg. 36' 40" E. 96.42 feet to an iron pin at Corner 3; the Place of Beginning, containing 0.337 acre, more or less. 77.19-1-3 BEGINNING at an iron pin at Corner 1 on the north side of W. F. Lockett Road at the southwest corner of T. R. Leslie property of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court for Roanoke County, said Beginning Point being approximately 155 yards from the northwest corner of intersection of Old Road and W. F. Lockett Road, said intersection being 0.1 mile north of Va. Hwy. Rt. 681; thence with the north side of W. F. Lockett Road, S. 55 deg. 00' 30" W. 40 feet to an iron pin at Corner 2; thence continuing with the same S. 71 deg. 09' 10" W. 108.52 feet to an iron pin at Corner 3; thence leaving W. F. Lockett Road and with two new lines through the property of Lottie R. Jamison, widow, (DB 255, Page 143) N. 33 deg. 36' 40" W. 96.42 feet to an iron pin at Corner 4, N. 44 deg. 42' 20" E. 112.53 feet to a point in the southwest line of T. R. Leslie property at Corner 5 where an iron pin is N. 44 deg. 42" 20" E. 0.42 feet from corner; thence with the southwest line of T. R. Leslie property S. 47 deg. 00' E. 149.97 feet to Corner 1, the Place of Beginning, containing 0.367 acre, more or less. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. zoning.laing t eRy 3o uoigpozjddp auk uodn uaxpq st uozgop stuq gpus 'Z •got.zgstQ Tpto.zautuzo0 Tp~aua0 ' Z-0 3o uoigpoz~isspj~ buTUOZ auk O~ '~OT~~STQ jpTquapTSag tCTTUIp3-Tgjnys ~~TSUaQ uznTpay~ '£-g ~o uoT~poi~isspjo buiuoz auk uzoa~ pabupuo ~ga.zau si 'goi.zgsiQ Tpi~agsibpy~ bui.zdS anp0 auk ui (9t-t-5t'LL 'St-t-St'LL 'i~t -t-5t' LL ' £t-t-5t ' LL ' Zt-t-St ' LL ' ~-t-6t ' LL .zagnznH dpl„I xps) sxop.zq ppo.zTipg u.zaugnoS xTo~.zoH auq 3o u~.zou ppog uapbp ~o apis gsaM aqq uo pa~pooj pus 'uta.zau pagi.zosap sp 'sa.zop L•g buiuipquoo agpgsa Tpaa ~o gop.zq utpq.zao p 3o uotgpaz3isspjo buzuoz auq opus • t sMOtjo~ sp ' ptuib.zin '1CqunoO axoupog 3o s.zosinaadnS 3o p.zpog auq Aq Q~HIKQ2i0 ZI ~8 •MpT ~Cq pa.ztnba.z sp papino.zd uaaq spq quau~asi~~anpp pus aoigou TpbaT ' SFI~2i~I-lly pus 9661 `9 ~pn~Qa3 Pup ' S66t ' S .zaquza~aQ uo .za~gpuz siu~ uo bui.zpaq ottgnd ~ pjaq uoissiuzuzo0 bu-ruupjd ~quno~ axoupog aqq ' SKS2i3HM 'Pup ~ 966t `LZ ~.zpn.zga3 0~ panui~uoo pus ' S66t ' Zt .zaquzaoaQ ptau a.zaM buz.zpau oitgnd pup buippa.z puooas aq~ Pup ' S66t ' T Z .zaquzanoH uo pjaq spry aoupuip.zo stq~ ~o butppa.z gs.zi~ aqq ' Sh'~2i~HM ~?IAHS2tK ~LNAIFIZiss ) JCS,NIII00 3~IOI~02I ao aslxoxsn~r sxs~raozsnsa z~rlxssnax= sHS ao xols~rolzaa~r sHS xoan z-o ao xols~rolalss~o oxlxoz sHS os ~ -2i ii0 AIOIZKOI~IISSK'IO JNIAIOZ 3HS AIO?I3 SOI2iS8Ia 'IKI2i3SSIJKYd JAII~ids 3A~T0 3HS HI ~9T-T-St' LL ' SZ-t-St' LL ' ~T-T-ST' LL ' £T-t-St' LL ' ZT-T-ST' LL ' i--T-6T' LL ' SOH a~i %KS) S~IOrd2Is Q~ai02i'II~I Ai2I3HZII08 ~IZ032i0Ai 3HS CIO HS2iON aK02I AI3aJ0 rI0 ZaIB ~I,83M 3HJ, HO a3SKOOZ 3ZKJ,s3 ZK32i 30 ZOK2is 32IOK-L' 9 K CIO DIOISfi0I3IS8K'IO JNINOZ 3HS 3Jl~iiHO OS 8T-96LZZ0 ~i0I1KNIaZIO 966T ~ LZ x2i~iII2I833 'A~ias3IIS '2I3J~N30 xOISK2iSSIxIAiaK XSNA00 H?ION~ii02i 3HS SK Q'ISH '~iIAiIJ2iIA ~JCSNII00 sxox~rox ao sxosln~3ans 3o a~ros sHS ao oxlss~ ~znosx ~ s~ 4~' a. • Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke county (Stranna Arthur) . 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: 77.19-1-4 BEGINNING at a point on the northerly side of the Norfolk and Western Railway right-of-way, which beginning point is N. 27 deg. 30' W. 666.5 feet from the northwesterly corner of the property owned by the Moses St.Clair heirs; thence with the said northerly side of the Norfolk and Western Railway right-of-way, S. 75 deg. 05' W. 262 feet to a stake on same; thence with the easterly boundary of the Poff property (formerly W. H. Lockett property), N. 27 deg.30' W. 288.5 feet to a point on the same; thence with the southerly side of Lockett Road, S. 61 deg. 45' E. 254 feet to a point on the westerly side of an old public road; thence with the said westerly side of an old public road, S. 27 deg. 30' E. 350 feet to the Place of Beginning and containing 1.86 acres. 77.15-1-12 BEGINNING at an old corner in the County road; thence S. 26 deg. 9' W. 236 feet to a fence post; thence S. 42 deg. 45' W. 374 feet to a fence corner post; thence N. 75 deg. 00' W. 182 feet to a fence corner post; thence N. 42 deg. 50' E. 664 feet to a fence corner post; thence S. 63 deg. 00' E. 105.8 feet to an old corner in the County road, and containing 2.16 acres, more or less. Less and except that certain .836 acre parcel formerly conveyed to T. R. Leslie and Eleanor Leslie, husband and wife, from J. T. Powell, Sr. , and Hazel M. Powell by deed dated January 21, 1965, and of record in the Clerk's office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County in Deed Book 762 at page 307. 77.15-1-13 BEGINNING at an iron pipe in a bend of a road corner to (formerly Noah J. Wertz); thence a new line S. 42 deg. W. along a wire fence 244.9 feet to an iron pipe, on Wm. F. Lockett's line at 2; thence S. 30 deg. 20' E. 118.25 feet to an iron pipe; thence N. 59 deg. 40' E. 215.94 feet to a fence corner post at 6; thence N. 25 deg. 10' W. 193.35 feet to the Place of Beginning; Known as Parcel A- 0.794 acre. 77.15-1-14 Commencing at the most southerly corner of the 0.20 acre tract for the Point of Beginning; thence N. 74 deg. 24' W. a distance of 112.24 feet, to Corner #3; thence N. 42 deg. 00' E. a distance of 123.88 feet, to Corner #2; thence S. 30 deg. 20' E. a distance of 118.25 feet, to Corner #5; thence S. 59 deg. 40' W. a distance of 40.00 feet, to Corner #4, the Point of Beginning, containing 0.20 acres, more or less. 77.15-1-15 2 BEGINNING at a tack in the top of a fence post at corner no. 1 at the west corner of the 0.197 acre tract property of L. M. Arthur and on the northerly line of the T. R. Leslie property; thence with the northerly line of Leslie property following existing fence N. 75 deg. 12' 20" W. 181.19 feet to an iron pin on the east side of a fence post at corner no. 2 and at the south corner of the E. F. Jamison property; thence with the southeasterly line of the Jamison property generally following the existing fence N. 42 deg. 39' 50" E. 269.87 feet to an iron pin at corner no. 3; thence with a new line through the property of J. T. Powell, Sr. and wife S. 47 deg. 13' 40" E. 160.45 feet to an iron pin at corner no. 4 on the northwesterly line of T. R. Leslie 0.794 acre tract; thence with the same and with the northwesterly line of L. N. Arthur property following the existing fence S. 42 deg. W. 184.87 feet to corner no. 1, the Place of Beginning, containing 0.836 acre, more or less. 77.15-1-16 BEGINNING at a point on the north side of W. F. Lockett's private road "A" corner to M. Boone's lot; thence running along the north side of said road a new line S. 31 deg. 45' W. 210 feet to a stake at "2"; thence leaving the road N. 47 deg.00' W. 409 feet to a stake at "3"; thence N. 20 deg. 30' E. 11 feet to a stake at "4" corner on the line of W. H. Hofawger's land; thence with his line and the line of others S. 74 deg. 54' E. 420 feet to the Place of Beginning and containing 1.02 acres. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A OPY TES Brenda J. olton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Timothy W. Gubala, Secretary3, IDA • '~ ~ ~ Site name: a ~ .' ~CF?f ~. ~. 1 ~ ~ ? / ~.y l~ _ ~ Off` L efl _.-~ ~ ~J,~ 1 '~ ~ Tan~lewood Mall area ~~ i _C2vercprin~ ~-~('~' 'o~~~~ ~ os~~ - °'~ • Stranna Arthur . /~;., ~ - ~ ern ki7e~ ~~.,~ A C~`~ -`~\ / -"O'b`i `. r-r~' ' ~~-1;s. - / ._ ,.. Scn-L-£S~LI\ ` iS ~ /~.: *aiL:tr `Wi't` 4~ N 't . C?;,~: .tC~~ ~~~YQ•I _J.er?' ~'`',,;j~d~nt~~J<~0.\ ~tlv '.\ :o _4•v .\.`• r !S ~~ /l~,+s'- \l l O~ Y C.. C.tl1• !.M i~, I; ~. 1 ~' . (• 1 733 ~ \¢- - ~ 0.2 \ ~ ~>' y~ ~ ~ \'~ wt \• . ,~ ~~~ ~ - \'Nyi v 21I `r/} CM y `V 1si. ' ', ~~ Tax Map Numbers: 'r 77.19-1-4 ~~~ 7~-- Request: R-3 to C-2 1.86 ac one-F;=3-to-E~-~) :, ~ l •r ~ b ''~ '~~ ~ ~~ ~~' ~5 ,~ ~ - Site name: "'' >`'~•~P ~ o ~ • ~ Tangiewood Mall area ~ (( CGitrn~e+ie~ tcxQ.~ 2 \ ~. y ~~ 4 '' ~ ~~•P ~fi~ %s~'y ~ Stranne ~_rthur propert` _ c ~ Or 'O F~" \~ i p go ~~ ~F. E`u~'1\ C4' ...`'. E. ~R y i- ~R t OL/OA • ~ CRLKt Ems.. ' , Q,O -~~ ~ F.L ~ C 1MM / C7 P0.FLC '~ , ~'`~`' vP~' C-r~-~ c .uvGCE-, Or 1409 v \ 2~ J~,CJ~ ~ M000 ' s G _ .- ~' " U )r~~ Y~ ~~• ~1 ~ `, ; ~`~, ~~ , ,~ • ,; ,• ~'~~- . ?, .: ,~~. _ i `,` .''~~ L. 1.T~~t ~`~ • . O ~ ~ \) 1 ~.~ / , `~ ~: a' a~' ,~ :' '': ,~~ I~ s ,` .a ~. ~ ~. a,~• 4,~ ~~ ti / ~~' J/ ,•', ~ -0` •• / i uxasl /~ ~~ ~~ i ~ ~, ~~ ~ f '' a' ~; ~` ~ / ~ ~{~.' / ~\/. o 1 ` ''/ ~/ ~` '~ ~~ ~~. ~ ,~' < s ,, ,~' ~ ~~ S 0 , .f~~ tit' ® ~ tt ~ \ t 6 r 14 r v ~$'~f ~~ • c\ o~ ~, l :'+. C ~. ~ Swr Gf~rr C+w 11 t+tr •a/r 101 171.410 tws L•v r~r 1a..~ CAr/ ~~ 1 Tax Map Numbers: Request: 77.15-1-12 Rezone R-3 to C-2 1.32 '7.15-1-13 Rezone R-3 to C-2 1. (A) 77.15-1-14 Rezone R-3 to C-2 .5 (A) 77.15-1-15 Rezone R-3 to C-2 1. (A) ._ 77.15-1-16 Rezone R-3 to C-2 1.02 V-9 PETITIONER: INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (STRANNA ARTHUR) CASE NUMBER: 51-12/95 Planning Commission Hearing Date: December 5, 1995 and February 6, 1996 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: February 27, 1996 A. REQUEST Petition of Industrial Development Authority (Stranna Arthur) to rezone 6.7 acres from R- 3 to C-2 to allow commercial uses, located on the west side of Ogden Road, north of the NS Railroad tracks, Cave Spring Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION None. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS None. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Witt moved to recommend approval of the request. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Witt, Hooker, Robinson, Ross, Thomason NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map Staff Report _ Other Terrance H ngton, a ary Roanoke ounty Pl ng Commission STAFF REPORT - PETITIONER: IDA/STRANNA ARTHUR -PREPARED BY: T1M BEARD CASE NUMBER: 51-12/95 DATE:- DECEMBER 5, 1995 PART I A. EXECUTNE SUMMARY B. DESCRIPTION V-9 ~~ Petition of Industrial Development Authority (Stranna Arthur) to rezone 6.7 acres from R-3 to C-2 to allow commercial uses, located on the west side of Ogden Road, north of the NS Railroad tracks, Cave Spring Magisterial District. Future potential uses may include any permitted use in the C-2 district. No specific project details have been provided. Proffers related to screening and buffering and maintenance of existing vegetation along the west slope adjacent to the Green Valley community are under consideration. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS By right uses in C-2 includes such varied retail uses as automobile dealerships and restaurants in addition to an array of office and civic uses and even limited residential, industrial and miscellaneous uses. Along with specific use and design standards, the complete range of ordinance regulations including building setbacks, height, building and lot coverage, signage, exterior lighting, screening and buffering, and parking will be applied. A commercial entrance permit will be required by the City of Roanoke. Site and building plans will be reviewed and approved by County staff before issuance of a building permit. • PART II V-ry ~ - - A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS - Location -The subject tracts are situated immediately west of the Petroleum Marketers Inc. (PMI) property (former Ogden Senior Citizens Center) off Ogden Road. The property is in the Cave Spring Community Planning Area and urban services are available. TopographyNegetation -The subject area is a combination of gently sloping and flat land and is mostly grass covered with very limited vegetation along the north boundary with Honeywood Apartments. A total of four houses are contained within the 6.7 acre area. Surroundinq_Neighborhood -The subject property is zoned R-3 and includes a total of four dwellings and three unoccupied lots within the 6.7 acre area. To the south lie NS Railway tracts. The Honeywood Apartment complex stands to the north (zoned R-3). To the east the PMI site if found (zoned C-1) and on the west is the mostly undeveloped property of Angie Laing (zoned R-3). B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ~ Access/Site Layout - No specific use has been proposed and no concept plan has been submitted. The County Attorney's office advises that any prospective developer(s) must acquire additional road width and upgrade Leslie Lane to VDOT acceptance standards. An improved entrance must be constructed at Leslie Lanes' intersection with Ogden Road. In conjunction with the sale of property to PMI, the southern tip of the PMI property near the Leslie Lane/Ogden Road intersection has been dedicated to Roanoke County for street purposes. The Engineering Department reports that stormwater management must be addressed and notes that a great deal of effort has recently been made to improve the Murray Run watershed immediately above the subject area. Murray Run has been identified as a potential greenway corridor by the Roanoke Valley Greenways/Open Space Steering Committee (not adjacent to this subject area) and vegetation preservation is discussed in the IDA/Angie Laing report. Also of significance are existing site grades which may be raised to enhance the visibility of retail commercial occupants. Such an effort would require significant amounts of fill material which could reduce the effect of existing or proposed screening and buffering. Traffic Generation/Circulation -The 1994 ADT on this segment of Ogden Road was 10,310 vehicles per Roanoke City Traffic Engineering records. No accidents were reported in 1994 along this stretch from the city limits (north end of bridge over NS tracks) to the entrance at Windward. No traffic generation figures can be projected without more detailed information on specific proposed uses. Sight distance requirements may necessitate turn lane construction in addition to widening and paving the intersection area around Ogden Road and Leslie Lane. _ 3 _ ~ ~9 Fire Rescue/Utilities -Emergency vehicle travel time is estimated at 4 to 8 minutes. Both public water and sanitary sewer can be extended from Ogden Road. - C. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY COMPREHENSNE PLAN The petitioner's site is designated Park/Open Space and Core by the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. Commercial development is inconsistent with Park/Open Space guidelines or policies. The plan advocates protection of open space through provision of amenities and limited building and lot coverages where development does occur. The Core designation encourages mixed use urban development including both residential and commercial, coordinated commercial site design and separation, and screening and buffering against less intensive development. D. CONFORMANCE Wfl-H COUNTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD Site and building plans, erosion and sediment control and stormwater management plans must be reviewed and approved. No position can be taken on compliance with the zoning ordinance without submission of a basic concept plan. PART III ~ STAFF CONCLUSIONS The applicant's request to rezone 6.7 acres from multifamily residential to general commercial without important background information has raised the possibility of serious negative impacts on surrounding, existing land uses including traffic access, final site grade(s), stormwater runoff in the Murray Run watershed, signage (little, if any public street frontage will be available) and preservation of existing vegetation. The Commission should consider further study of this request to better determine the probable impacts; the most important of which may be access needs and options. For sra~ f use en/y COUN i Y OF RO,^-,NOKE DEPT . OF PLANNING ND ZONING 3738.5r~mci_tcn Ave. S','1 P.O. box 2°800 - - Roar,oke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2008 FAX (703) 772-2030 z:~ii a;ien tee: I ?Cic?r. dam- ;,iaca;ds issued: 305 da;e: Case ,`u-~e~: 1~ ~~/~,~ Check type of application filed (check all that apply}: C~ REZONING ^ SPECIAL USE ^VARIANCE Applicant's name: Industrial Development authority o= Roanoke County Phone: (~04) i i4- Address: P.O. Bos 20068, 1919 Electric Rd., Roanoke, VA Zip Code: 1197 24018 Phone: Owner's name: See attached sheets ~~ Address: - Zip Code: ~~ ~ /~ ~ C~~/ , /! ~L./~i~~C/ Location of property: ~ Tax Map Number: See ch h et See attached sheets ~~,iagisterial District: See attached sheet / / Community Planning Area: Size of arcel s): Existing Zoning: See attached sheets (See , acres at achment~,ft. Existing Land Use: See attached sheets :: ~:: R Proposed Zoning: See attached sheets /J' ~~ ............................. ForSfah`Use only Proposed Land Use:. See attached sheets (.~ Use Type: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being prO~icrc~ ~~ith this request? Yc""~ NO .. ~t7" .....f.~~........... ..............................:............:.:..............:......:.. Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. NS V ~~, NS V A"S V Consultation ~ ~ 8 1 /2" x 1 1 " ccncept plan Application fee Application ~' Metes and bounds description ~'~" Proffers, if applicable Justification `?`>: Mater and sewer application Adjoining property owners /hereby certify that / am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the know/edged consent oft e owner. Owner's Signature: •'tG~LGr%~9 L~ ~~ ~~~, ~J _ Edward A. Nacc, Counsel, Industrial uzvelupmC~l~ ~+u~~~uc~~y - or Roanoke County, Virginia . ~ /..~ • - - - SITE EVALLATION CRITERIA SITE NAME TAX ~L~P # MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Stranna Arthur 77.19-1--1 Cave Spring SITE LOCATION West side of Ogden Road, specifically; west and south of Leslie lane, adjacent to NS Railroad tracks SITE SIZE 1.86 acres ~'~, ~`s i ~/~ EXISTING LAND USE Single family residences for rent ~, EXISTING ZONING R3 PROPOSED ZONING C2 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATIOi`,T Park and open space WATER SERVICE 12-inch water line (City) in Ogden Road SEWER SERVICE 8-inch sew er at Ogden Road and PMI project ROAD ACCESS Access point at Ogden Road for Leslie Lane ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY COMMENTS 1992-94 Economic Development Strategy calls for rezoning of selected parcels in 419 corridor for commercial uses. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT RATIONALE FOR REZONING Rezoning needed to assemble parcels for proposed commercial site that can be marketed jointly with other Stranna Arthur and Laing properties. Market demand for C2 commercial property in Tanglewood Ma1U419 market area. PLANNING COMIvIITTEE/IDA SUBCO~IITTEE COMMENTS • RECOMMENDATION 12 J~ti • SITE EVALUATION CRITERIA - - - -~ SITE NAiviE TAX MAP # MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Stranna Arthur 77.1 ~-1-12,13,14,15,16 Cave Spring SITE LOCATION West side of Ogden Road behind PMI building and north of Leslie Lane SITE SIZE 4.84 acres EXISTING LAND USE Single family residences for rent EXISTING ZONING R3 PROPOSED ZONING C2 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION Park and open space WATER SERVICE 12-inch water line (City) in Ogden Road SEWER SERVICE 8-inch sew er at Ogden Road for PMI project ROAD ACCESS Access point at Ogden Road for Leslie Lane ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY COI~~IENTS 1992-94 Economic Development Strategy calls for rezoning of selected parcels in 419 corridor for commercial uses. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT RATIONALE FOR REZONING Rezoning needed to assemble parcels for proposed commercial site that can be marketed jointly with adjacent Laing property. Market demand for C2 commercial property in Tanglewood Ma1U419 market area. PLANNING COMIVIITTEE/IDA SUBCOMMITTEE COMMENTS . RECOMMENDATION - ----- ------- --11 Site name: C `+ f .~~c} ` ,/ / \ Tanglewood Mall area ''~ tea' ~ ; ' C ~s.,~,u,o~/~~--~=r~:- s„~+'a pa', . `C~'F' 'moo _ / f ,+uR ~1,rG ~ ~~~ ~, ~- w~`°" - ,Cavcr r ` r~ .~~,~' ° ~ o ~ _ ~-^~'" ;+ Stranna Arthur <•CP.~~+ry ~-±.~ ~`df1T.~ ~'nQC~'•~~` ~''ps'`~}~~r'~_c,C,c-i;1- r ~ '" 5`"t£su `i_ ~ /'~'/„~ •Ef'~~tE~ ~ I+\`fi~/4-c~_K~ : /S,,`c~:-.a! l ~ 4 Ct . i / \ ' ~ / i ~ / \ • RJT ~ s '~• 2M y.~ R:a 9G~~ ~~t'` ,.,. ~ R.7! ,;,,, . ~ ~. ,,.• ,~ "'• RS7 ~.~ rta na ~ ' ., t ct. „ ~ 47 1 1 )I• 46 , ~~ ~ Y - 11 'i ~, ~ . ~ i d' ` ~•° ' / ~ , '' ' , , ~ ~ s' ' ti t . . v ,d • w ~ ro '~~+ r .3 • 01 ` ~~ .' O\ a! r . ai ~ P e ~ ~ o fit ~ ~ ~. ~ i w _ ~ ~ ~,- w :6 ,01' °~ '' •• r / 1 + ./C r r ~ r 3.s aos .. ,s Ce. Gi O~. J.e~ / ''/y I• ~~ ~~ Ss ~n +. .~ •, . •. ~J, ~ ~~ .- . "'. i 23t ~ CM 4 t~ ~° \v// C + e.z S~ racy •• Tax Map Numbers: Request: R-3 to C-2 10 86 ac 7 7.19 -1- 4 ~ 'z + ~~_ ~ ~' tae- - ~ Rezon - o-C-~S-(-~7- _ _ i.?~a o ~ \ a.~+~~c ~ •! ~ /~ C G~',7i 1 a ~ • I) '~ ,- `- ~ ,'t. ~ ~5 .r~;~ ~ p Site name: -<.~r. > .-. a ~_ « c;~.~ ~~ ~ . • - Tangiewood Mall area ~. ~ .~ v ~ v Oi _:e~n Scn`~L7~ C~•rJ~a\ ^ ~~..• ~ _ G~r-ii;.i~ I ~ ~ L A. t C 1. pF ~ _ ~ i~~o~~4~` _ ~ps~' ~ 1 Stranna ~_rthur property _ • ~' r OL/0A ~~ • ~ CR R E3~.. ~ 1 Rp~C . ,_P~ ..~. C7R-f~'~S\Af~C ri Sr vP~,, +~~_..~ ~~T.~C~ 11U00 ~ ~~ sly _. ~,r 1409 ~vQ ` 2) cpJ _- '- uU ~)c;~ ~~~ ~~ a` lag act /~ ~~ C, '~ 9 ~~' ~ ~~t ~' °o .~ :- / 1 • '` `` •,' ,, ~ / oG' 'off t ,;;~ =' a''a ~;;~ ~,~ ea. ,` s.ruc ~ / - L• ti ~ 4~• ~ i : O ~/ __ `7 i ~:` ,~ / ' ~. ~ / ~ ~s " , - // ~~ b S i~ ~ ~e .~o as _ ~~~ / i ` / ~.:. c ~' s n 3 / / c ~ / ~'. ` QJ ` ~~ ~ .'~ i/ ~ / j~ I ~ J 1 i s ~+ ~~ 4 P ~~ O ' t~ca ~ ~ C+r.~r Gre.+a .~' t u~c II "~ st a.uuc~m 1 Tt410 Ca.y !+v /rr r ~, 6 14 ~: -- ~, , Tax Map Numbers: 77.15-1-I2 7.15-1-13 77.15-1-14 77.15-1-15 77.15-1-16 Request: Rezone R-3 to C-2 1.32 Rezone R-3 to C-2 1. (A) Rezone R-3 to C-2 .S (A) Rezone R-3 to C-2 1. (A) _ Rezone R-3 to C-2 1.02 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE ~ COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 1996 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 6.7-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF OGDEN ROAD NORTH OF THE NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD TRACKS (TAX MAP NOS. 77.19-1-4, 77.15-1-12, 77.15-1-13, 77.15-1-14, 77.15-15, 77.19-1-16) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-3 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2 UPON THE APPLICATION OF THE INDIISTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AIITHORITY OF ROANORE COUNTY (STRANNA ARTHUR) WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on November 21, 1995, and the second reading and public hearing were held December 12, 1995, and continued to February 27, 1996; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on December 5, 1995, and February 6, 1996; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 6.7 acres, as described herein, and located on the west side of Ogden Road north of the Norfolk Southern Railroad tracks (Tax Map Number 77.19-1-4, 77.15-1-12, 77.15-1-13, 77.15-1- 14, 77.15-15, 77.19-1-16) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-3, Medium Density Multi-Family Residential District, to the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District. 1 t`I w~ 1 2. That this action is taken upon the application of The Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke county (stranna Arthur). 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: 77.19-1-4 BEGINNING at a point on the northerly side of the Norfolk and Western Railway right-of-way, which beginning point is N. 27 deg. 30' W. 666.5 feet from the northwesterly corner of the property owned by the Moses St.Clair heirs; thence with the said northerly side of the Norfolk and Western Railway right-of-way, S. 75 deg. 05' W. 262 feet to a stake on same; thence with the easterly boundary of the Poff property (formerly W. H. Lockett property), N. 27 deg.30' W. 288.5 feet to a point on the same; thence with the southerly side of Lockett Road, S. 61 deg. 45' E. 254 feet to a point on the westerly side of an old public road; thence with the said westerly side of an old public road, S. 27 deg. 30' E. 350 feet to the Place of Beginning and containing 1.86 acres. 77.15-1-12 BEGINNING at an old corner in the County road; thence S. 26 deg. 9' W. 236 feet to a fence post; thence S. 42 deg. 45' W. 374 feet to a fence corner post; thence N. 75 deg. 00' W. 182 feet to a fence corner post; thence N. 42 deg. 50' E. 664 feet to a fence corner post; thence S. 63 deg. 00' E. 105.8 feet to an old corner in the County road, and containing 2.16 acres, more or less. Less and except that certain .836 acre parcel formerly conveyed to T. R. Leslie and Eleanor Leslie, husband and wife, from J. T. Powell, Sr. , and Hazel M. Powell by deed dated January 21, 1965, and of record in the Clerk's office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County in Deed Book 762 at page 307. 77.15-1-13 BEGINNING at an iron pipe in a bend of a road corner to (formerly Noah J. Wertz); thence a new line S. 42 deg. W. along a wire fence 244.9 feet to an iron pipe, on Wm. F. Lockett's line at 2; thence S. 30 deg. 20' E. 118.25 feet to an iron pipe; thence N. 59 deg. 40' E. 215.94 feet to a fence corner post at 6; thence N. 25 deg. 10' W. 193.35 feet to the Place of Beginning; Known as Parcel A- 0.794 acre. 77.15-1-14 Commencing at the most southerly corner the Point of Beginning; thence N. 74 112.24 feet, to Corner #3; thence N. 42 123.88 feet, to Corner #2; thence S. 30 118.25 feet, to Corner #5; thence S. 59 40.00 feet, to Corner #4, the Point of acres, more or less. of the 0.20 acre tract for deg. 24' W. a distance of deg. 00' E. a distance of deg. 20' E. a distance of deg. 40' W. a distance of Beginning, containing 0.20 2 ,. ~-9 77.15-1-15 BEGINNING at a tack in the top of a fence post at corner no. 1 at the west corner of the 0.197 acre tract property of L. M. Arthur and on the northerly line of the T. R. Leslie property; thence with the northerly line of Leslie property following existing fence N. 75 deg. 12' 20" W. 181.19 feet to an iron pin on the east side of a fence post at corner no. 2 and at the south corner of the E. F. Jamison property; thence with the southeasterly line of the Jamison property generally following the existing fence N. 42 deg. 39' 50" E. 269.87 feet to an iron pin at corner no. 3; thence with a new line through the property of J. T. Powell, Sr. and wife S. 47 deg. 13' 40" E. 160.45 feet to an iron pin at corner no. 4 on the northwesterly line of T. R. Leslie 0.794 acre tract; thence with the same and with the northwesterly line of L. N. Arthur property following the existing fence S. 42 deg. W. 184.87 feet to corner no. 1, the Place of Beginning, containing 0.836 acre, more or less. 77.15-1-16 BEGINNING at a point on the north side of W. F. Lockett's private road "A" corner to M. Boone's lot; thence running along the north side of said road a new line S. 31 deg. 45' W. 210 feet to a stake at "2" ; thence leaving the road N. 47 deg. 00' W. 409 feet to a stake at "3"; thence N. 20 deg. 30' E. 11 feet to a stake at "4" corner on the line of W. H. Hofawger's land; thence with his line and the line of others S. 74 deg. 54' E. 420 feet to the Place of Beginning and containing 1.02 acres. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. zoning.arthur 3 t t u io~~~1tu111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111 111111111 Illllllllllllllllllll~j - ~ ~r - q - (,`t - - - - '~. AGENDA ITEM NO. - - APPE CE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COn~~NTS - - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED __ BELOW: :_ ^ Each s esker will be iven between three to five minutes to comment P whethe speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, - and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ofgthe Board to do otherwise. - _ _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. - = ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments - nth the clerk. c ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. _ -_ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - -_ - c - i S - ~1 - s ~ - ~ - ~ - ~ - s - - NAME , c~~ ~~' 1' ~-_ ~"~'.,~' ~,~~ -~-.~ - - _ - i ~~ ~ Tip{ lR-~ ADDRESS ~ ~ 7 / y~i ~~ s,~/1~~ ~'~-~ _ 5~;~ '~'~ - ~~s ~. ,~ - - - s - PHONE -~ ~ / r ~ T ~ o-/ - - --- - _ __ fiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiviiiiir~n~iii~iiiniiiiniiiiiii~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~~ttii~~i~r~miiit~it»~~~~~~~iiiiiiiiii~ ~.. Robert K. Egbert 3571 Bradshaw Rd. Salem, Va. 24153 540-384-7448 Feb. 23, 1996 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors W Gentlemen, I have two requests related to land use in Roanoke County. One concerns the Virginia Tech Farm in Catawba Valley and the other concerns one of the recommendations of the Resource Preservation Focus Group from the recent Visioning process. Regarding the farm: Please adopt a resolution opposing any future requests for rezoning of this land to residential or commercial status. If you cannot prevent the state from selling it and cannot afford to buy it, please serve notice to any prospective buyers that developement is not an option any time in the forseeable future. Regarding the Focus Group recommendation: The Resource Preservation Focus Group asked that you establish a natural & scenic resource foundation to accept the donation of land, conservation easements, or cash for the purpose of buying developement rights. This would enable land owners and other concerned citizens to take voluntary action to preserve open space in our community. Please give these matters your fullest attention. Thank you. Respectfully, ~~-~.~ k. ~~cz.~- ~~~~~ ~ 1111rr~it~1111111111i1111111111llliltlltllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllljj i 1 ~. ~t V ~ ) 2 // AGENDA ITEM NO. GV APPE CE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE ~ CITIZENS COMI~~NTS __ c SUBJECT: 1l ' ~~ ~-~x-- (ire eL%C?~-) ~ ~Ce n~ c.c.;2~_.~ -_ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. c WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless i t t d b th t~ h ns ruc e y e majority o t e Board to do otherwise. .. __ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ SQeakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. c ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME ~~} !~ `1J c c..v L l,~ ~-> _ i ~ ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ADDRESS ~ l ~ ~o G-~1~}f~ ~ Z" ~-,~-.iii N ~ t2~ ~ `~ G 1 ~ _ i PHONE ~ ~ `F q~ fiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~niiiiiiiiiiimnimn~niiiiiiiiiiifiiiiiiiiiiiii~iiiiiiiii~~i~n~iiin~iii~iiiiittiiiiiiiiiiiiiii A-022796-19 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER X - ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 27, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Public Hearing for Citizen Comment on the Real Estate Tax Rate and the "Effective" Real Estate Tax Rate Increase on March 26, 1996. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: This may require a Work Session to reach Board consensus before determining how to advertise. For this reason, I am placing the item in the evening, after the Budget Work Session. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Staff would like to hold a public hearing at the March 26, 1996 Board of Supervisor's meeting to hear citizen comment on the proposed items mentioned above for the 1996 calendar year. This date is requested in order to meet the schedule of printing and mailing tax bills, as outlined in ATTACHMENT 1. The format for advertising and holding this public hearing will be modified this year to accomodate the circumstances of the proposed real estate tax increase of not more than $0.02, to $1.15. This change in procedure should provide the public with a clearer understanding of the intent of the Board of Supervisors in regards to the setting of tax rates, while maintaining compliance with state regulations. Attachments are included to explain the rationale and format of the proposed public advertisement and related public hearing as follows: Attachment 1: Calendar of dates to set tax rates Attachment 2: Sample ad for Notice of Proposed Real Property Tax Increase with proposed 1996 real estate rate at $1.13 per $100 of assessed value. Attachment 3: Sample ad for Notice of Proposed Real Property Tax Increase with proposed 1996 real estate rate at $1.15 per $100 of assessed value. Attachment 4: Memo outlining proposed changes in format of advertisements and public hearings. As stated previously, the proposed real estate tax rate will be advertised at a "not to exceed amount" and can be set at a lower amount without need of additional public hearings or public notice. i ~~ Advertisements would have to be placed in the Roanoke Times on Tuesday, March 19 to meet legal guidelines regarding proper public notice. ALTERNATIVES: Rate to be included in the public advertisement for real estate: a.) "...of not more than $1.13 per $100 of assessed value." b.) "...of not more than $1.15 per $100 of assessed value." STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff would ask the Board to set a public hearing on March 26, 1996 to hear public comment on the proposed Real Estate Tax Rate and the "Effective" Real Estate Tax Rate Increase. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, ~~(~--- `~tr~, Brent Robertson Elmer C. Hodge Budget Manager County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION Approved (x) Motion by: Motion by H. Odell Denied ( ) Minnix to set public hearing Received ( ) for 3/26/96 and advertise tax Referred ( ) rate of not more than 51.13 per To ( ) 5100 assessed valuation VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy x Harrison x Johnson x Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Brent Robertson, Budget Manager Attachment 1 X- / Calendar of Latest Possible Dates to Set Tax Rate Board decides what tax rate to advertise February 27, 1996 Tax rate advertisement to paper March 12, 1996 Tax rate advertisement runs in paper March 19, 1996 Public hearing on tax rate March 26, 1996 Referendum Apri12, 1996 Board adopts tax rate Apri19, 1996 Print tax bills April 10, 1996 Mail tax bills April 16, 1996 Tax payment due June 5, 1996 M:\finance\common\tax-cale.wpd February 23, 1996 --- Attachment 2 Sample Advertisement - $1.13 NOTICE OF PROPOSED REAL PROPERTY TAX INCREASE The County of Roanoke proposes to increase property tax levies. 1. Assessment Increase: Total assessed value of real property, excluding additional assessments due to new construction or improvements to property exceeds last year's total assessed value of real property by4.08 percent. 2. Lowered Rate Necessary to Offset Increased Assessment: The tax rate which would levy the same amount of real estate tax as last year, when multiplied by the new total assessed value of real estate with the exclusions mentioned above, would be $1.08per $100 of assessed value. This rate will be known as the "lowered tax rate." 3. Effective Rate Increase: The County of Roanoke's current tax rate is $1.13 per $100 of assessed value. The difference between the lowered tax rate and the current rate would be $O.OSper $100, or 4.63 percent. This difference will be known as the "effective tax rate increase." 4 The County of Roanoke proposes to set a real estate tax rate of not more than $1.13 per $100 assessed valuation. 5. Proposed Total Budget Increase: Based on the proposed real property tax rate and changes in other revenues, the total budget of the County of Roanoke will exceed last year's by 6.68 percent. Individual property taxes may, however, increase at a percentage greater than or less than the above percentage. A public hearing on the increase will be held on Tuesday,March 26, 1996, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, Virginia. ~(- / Attachment 3 Sample Advertsisment - $1.15 NOTICE OF PROPOSED REAL PROPERTY TAX INCREASE The County of Roanoke proposes to increase property tax levies. 1. Assessment Increase: Total assessed value of real property, excluding additional assessments due to new construction or improvements to property exceeds last year's total assessed value of real property by4.08 percent. 2. Lowered Rate Necessary to Offset Increased Assessment: The tax rate which would levy the same amount of real estate tax as last year, when multiplied by the new total assessed value of real estate with the exclusions mentioned above, would be $1.08per $100 of assessed value. This rate will be known as the "lowered tax rate." 3. Effective Rate Increase: The County of Roanoke's current tax rate is $1.13 per $100 of assessed value. The difference between the lowered tax rate and the current rate would be $O.OSper $100, or 4.63 percent. This difference will be known as the "effective tax rate increase." 4. The County of Roanoke proposes to set a real estate tax rate of not more than $1.15 per $100 assessed valuation, an increase of $0.02 in the current rate. 5. Proposed Total Budget Increase: Based on the proposed real property tax rate and changes in other revenues, the total budget of the County of Roanoke will exceed last year's by 7.51 percent. Individual property taxes may, however, increase at a percentage greater than or less than the above percentage. A public hearing on the increase will be held on Tuesday,March 26, 1996, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, Virginia. /~ _ ,/ Attachment 4 MEMORANDUM TO: Members, Board of Supervisors FROM: Brent Robertson, Budget Manager DATE: February 27, 1996 SUBJECT: Public Hearings and Advertisements -Setting Tax Rates In past years, the County has held two separate public hearings to comply with state code in regards to setting tax rates and increased assessments. One hearing would allow public comment on proposed tax rates for real estate, personal property and machinery and tools while the other hearing permitted comment on increased real estate assessments that equated to an "effective" rate increase. These hearings, and the related public advertisements, are mandated by state code. The wording of the "Effective" Rate Increase advertisement is also dictated by the state and has always caused confusion for the public. The possibility of increasing the real estate tax rate by no more then $0.02 further complicates the process of informing our citizens and complying with state code. The County Attorney has advised that two separate public hearings must be held, but the format can be legally changed. In an effort to minimize public confusion, staff would like to publish two separate ads for public hearings as follows: Proposed Real Property Tax Increase To comply with state regulations, this ad must state the assessment increase, the lowered rate necessary to offset the increased assessment, the effective rate increase and the proposed total budget increase. Staff is proposing inserting an additional point that states "the County proposes to set a real estate tax rate of not more than $1.15 per $100 assessed valuation, an increase of $0.02 in the current rate" (Attachment 2 is a sample advertisement). The insertion of the proposed real estate rate satisfies state code for proper public notice for the setting of rates as well as avoids public confusion by addressing all real estate issues in one advertisement (and one public hearing). Staff has also modified the wording of the ad to distinguish between increases relating to reassessments at the current rate and the proposed rate increase. M:\finance\budget\adverti s\pubhear. mem x-~ Attachment 4 Setting of Personal Property and Machinery and Tools Tax Rates This ad would list only the above mentioned rates. In the past, this ad also listed the proposed real estate tax rate, but was removed and addressed in the above mentioned ad. Attachment 3 is a sample of the advertisement that would be published for this public hearing. As stated previously, the County Attorney has advised separate public hearings for the above items. Separating the issues of real estate and "other" tax rates should help avoid public confusion and facilitate more focused public hearings. Diane Hyatt, Paul Mahoney, Mr. Hodge and myself have discussed the format and content of these proposed advertisements. M:\finance\budget\advertis\pubhear. mem D G3 G^~ ff ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, ~-- ORDER SETTING THE TAX RATE ON REAL ESTATE SITUATE IN ROANOKE COUNTY FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1996 BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the levy for the twelve-month period beginning January 1, 1996, and ending December 31, 1996, be, and hereby is, set for a tax rate of per one hundred dollars of assessed ................... valuation on all taxable real estate and mobile homes classified by §§ 58.1-3200, 58.1-3201, and 58.1-3506.B of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, situate in Roanoke County. c:\wp51\egend a\gen ere]\texrete.re .~~ ~,~~ u ~ ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, "' -/ ORDER SETTING THE TAX RATE ON REAL ESTATE SITUATE IN ROANOKE COUNTY FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1996 BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the levy for the twelve-month period beginning January 1, 1996, and ending December 31, 1996, be, and hereby is, ................... set for a tax rate of ~ per one hundred dollars of assessed valuation on all taxable real estate and mobile homes classified by §§ 58.1-3200, 58.1-3201, and 58.1-3506.B of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, situate in Roanoke County. c:\wp51\agende~gen ere]\texrete. re ., A-022796-20 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~''Z' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 27, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Public Hearing for Citizen Comment on the Personal Property and Machinery and Tools Tax Rates COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Recommend holding the Public Hearing on March 26, 1996. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Staff would like to hold a public hearing at the March 26, 1996 Board of Supervisor's meeting to hear citizen comment on the proposed tax rates mentioned above for the 1996 calendar year. Personal Property tax rates are proposed to be set at not more than $3.50 per $100 assessed valuation and Machinery and Tools tax rates are proposed to be set at not more than $3.00 per $100 assessed valuation. These proposed rates represent no increase over 1996 rates. In the past this public hearing, and the related advertisement, has addressed setting the tax rates for real estate, personal property and machinery and tools. The proposed real estate tax rates have been removed from this section and included in the "Effective" Real Estate Tax Increase public hearing required by state law. Dealing with the real estate tax issue as one item should be less confusing to the public. Attachments are included to explain the rationale and format of the proposed public advertisement and related public hearing. Advertisements would have to be placed in the Roanoke Times on Tuesday, March 19 to meet legal guidelines regarding proper public notice. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff would ask the Board to schedule a public hearing on setting the tax rates for Personal Property and Machinery and Tools on March 26, 1996. Respectfully submitted, Brent Robertson Budget Manager Approved by, ' .:,-l. _ Elmer C. Hod e County Administrator /~ Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION VOTE Motion by: Motion by H. Odell No Yes Abs Minnix to set public hearing Eddy x for 3/26f96 and advertise tax Harrison x rate of not more than 53.50 per Johnson x 5100 assessed valuation for Minnix x personal property and not more Nickens x than 53.00 per 5100 assessed valuation for machinery & tools tax cc: File Brent Robertson, Budget Manager Attachment 1 MEMORANDUM TO: Members, Board of Supervisors FROM: Brent Robertson, Budget Manager DATE: February 27, 1996 SUBJECT: Public Hearings and Advertisements -Setting Tax Rates In past years, the County has held two separate public hearings to comply with state code in regards to setting tax rates and increased assessments. One hearing would allow public comment on proposed tax rates for real estate, personal property and machinery and tools while the other hearing permitted comment on increased real estate assessments that equated to an "effective" rate increase. These hearings, and the related public advertisements, are mandated by state code. The wording of the "Effective" Rate Increase advertisement is also dictated by the state and has always caused confusion for the public. The possibility of increasing the real estate tax rate by no more then $0.02 further complicates the process of informing our citizens and complying with state code. The County Attorney has advised that two separate public hearings must be held, but the format can be legally changed. In an effort to minimize public confusion, staff would like to publish the following advertisement for the public hearing: Setting of Personal Property and Machinery and Tools Tax Rates This ad would list only the above mentioned rates. In the past, this ad also listed the proposed real estate tax rate, but was removed and addressed in the above mentioned ad. Attachment 2 is a sample of the advertisement that would be published for this public hearing. Separating the issues of real estate and "other" tax rates should help avoid public confusion and facilitate more focused public hearings. Diane Hyatt, Paul Mahoney, Mr. Hodge and myself have discussed the format and content of this proposed advertisement. M:\finance\budget\advertis\pubhear 1. mem •' r '~~ Attachment 2 PUBLIC NOTICE Please be advised that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, at its meeting on the 26th day of March, 1996 at the Roanoke County Administration Center in Roanoke, Virginia, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, will hold a public hearing on the following matter, to-wit: TO SET A PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX RATE OF NOT MORE THAN $3.50 PER $100 ASSESSED VALUATION IN ROANOKE COUNTY. TO SET A MACHINERY AND TOOLS TAX RATE OF NOT MORE THAN $3.00 PER $100 ASSESSED VALUATION IN ROANOKE COUNTY. Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Publish on the following dates: March 19, 1996 D~lp~ :' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, ORDER SETTING THE TAX LEVY ON ALL CLASSES OF PERSONAL PROPERTY SITUATE IN ROANOKE COUNTY FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1996 BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the levy for the twelve-month period beginning January 1, 1996, and ending December 31, 1996, be, and hereby is, set for a tax rate of per one hundred dollars of assessed ................... valuation on all taxable, tangible personal property, excluding all those classes of household goods and personal effects as are defined in §§ 58.1-3504 and 58.1-3505 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, but including the property separately classified by §§ 58.1-3500, 58.1-3501, 58.1-3502, 58.1-3506 in the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, of public service corporations based upon the assessed value thereof fixed by the State Corporation Commission and duly certified. 2. That there be, and hereby is, established as a separate class of personal property in Roanoke County those items of personal property set forth in § 58.1-3506 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and adopted by Ordinance No. 121592-11, and generally designated as Motor Vehicles for Disabled Veterans. 3. That the levy for the twelve-month period beginning January 1, 1996, and ending December 31, 1996, be, and hereby is, set at fifty (50~) percent of the tax rate established in paragraph 1 for the taxable, tangible personal property as herein established as a separate classification for tax purposes and as more fully A x- z defined by § 58.1-3506 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and generally designated as Motor Vehicles for Disabled Veterans. 4. That there be, and hereby is, established as a separate class of personal property in Roanoke County those items of personal property set forth in § 58.1-3507 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and generally designated as machinery and tools. 5. That the levy for the twelve-month period beginning January 1, 1996, and ending December 31, 1996, be, and hereby is, ................... set for a tax rate of gQ per one hundred dollars of assessed valuation on all taxable, tangible personal property as herein established as a separate classification for tax purposes and as more fully defined by § 58.1-3507 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and generally designated as machinery and tools. c:\wp51\egenda\genere]\texrete.pp COUNTY OF ROANOKE REVIEW OF TAX RATES. DEBT AND WATER RATES TAX RATES The tax rate for the County of Roanoke is in line with other growing counties and cities that provide similar services. The County of Roanoke is a full service county, that provides almost all of the services that cities in Virginia provide. It cannot be compared with rural counties that do not provide such services as trash collection, parks and recreation, and public safety. Attachment A shows the other localities in Virginia with a higher tax rate in 1995. In addition, we have heard that Fairfax is considering a 7 to 17 cent tax increase, and Arlington is considering a 4.4 cent tax increase. DEBT The County of Roanoke has a level of debt that is consistent with other growing counties and cities. Attachment B shows other localities that have a higher level of gross debt per capita, as of June 30, 1994. This is the most recent source of compiled data, however from talking with other localities over the last year, most are also considering issuing additional debt. The County is addressing the issue of debt levels with the debt policy that will be introduced at the February 27, 1996 Board meeting. A debt policy is a planned approach to issuing debt. It sets the ratios that are to be maintained in order to be a fiscally responsible locality. The debt policy discussion will show that the County debt is growing, but is still within the acceptable level of debt. The current level of County debt, and the proposed new debt level is an acceptable amount with the rating agencies. The adoption of a debt policy that formalizes a plan of action is an extremely positive measure to the rating agencies. The current County debt can be broken down as follows: Water and Sewer projects $65,372,500 School projects 39,668,297 General government 37.094.812 Total $142.135.608 With the issuance of the proposed new debt, the schools will have the largest portion of debt outstanding. This reflects the Board's commitment to education and the growing lack of funding that we are receiving from the State. WATER RATES "I'he County of Roanoke does currently have high water rates, although they are not the highest in the State. Attachment C shows other localities in the State that have higher water rates. In 1991, the County issued $75 million of debt the pay for the Spring Hollow water project. This project will meet the water needs of the County for the next 50 years. The old county water system was composed of hundreds of wells. These wells over the years have begun to be contaminated and have begun to dry up. The new water system will provide water for all of the county citizens as these wells removed from service. In addition, it will provide water for growth and to attract new businesses to the county. The debt for these bonds is paid for through the water rates. In this manner, the citizens that are receiving the benefit of the service are paying for it. Other localities in the State have systems that were already in place. Many were funded with Federal monies that are no longer available for the construction of new systems. Cities have the advantage of a more compact area with higher population densities to pay for their systems. SEWER RATES While water rates in the county are high, sewer rates are lower than in most localities. Attachment D shows the localities in Virginia that have a higher sewer rate. Since most citizens receive a combined bill for water and sewer, the lower sewer rate helps to somewhat offset the higher water rate. Attachment A Cities Chesapeake Clifton Forge Clonial Heights Hampton Hopewell Lynchburg Manassas Manassas Park Newport News Norfolk Petersburg Portsmouth Richmond Suffolk Virginia Beach unties Fairfax Prince William Local Government Roanoke County Roanoke City Salem Real Property Tax Tax RatePer $100 Assessment $1.290 $1.200 $1.250 $1.230 $1.220 $1.130 $1.240 $1.440 $1.200 $1.400 $1.490 $1.360 $1.450 $1.210 $1.190 $1.160 $1.360 $1.130 $1.230 $1.180 M:\finance\wmmon\tax.~vpd February 26, 1996 Attachment B Outstanding Debt Per Capita Gross Debt ities Per Capita Bedford $4,460.03 Chesapeake $2,191.64 Covington $2,033.66 Falls Church $2,911.09 Fredericksburg $2,428.37 Harrisonburg $1,737.87 Lynchburg $1,887.69 Manassas $1,815.00 Manassas Park $1,984.87 Newport News $2,121.06 Norfolk $2,542.10 Richmond $3,454.46 ounties Arlington $2,452.52 Fairfax $1,703.18 Spotsylvania $1,942.48 Stafford $1,83 8.74 Local Government Roanoke County $1,690.53 Roanoke City $1,569.38 Salem $936.22 M:\finance\common\debt.wpd February 26, 1996 1~ttachment C Water Rates Higher than Roanoke County Town of Applachia Bedford County Blue Ridge Utility Co. Botetourt County Broadview Water Works Cantebury Village Caroline Utilities City of Covington Earlysville Forest Water Corp. Fauquier County Town of Fincastle Town of Gate City Gloucester County Town of Hurt Jerdons Island Montgomery County Town of Mt. Crawford Town of Phenix Town of Pocahontas Shenandoah County Shenandoah Retreat Smyth County Town of Stephens City Sydnor Water Corp. VA American Water Co. Prince William County VA Surburban Water Co. M:\finance\common\water-2.wpd February 26, 1996 Attachment D Sewer Rates Higher than Roanoke County Abingdon Gordonsville Town of Pulaski Amherst County Greensville County Radford Town of Applachia Hanover County Rapidan Appomattox Henrico County Richmond Town of Ashland Henry County P.J.A. Rural Retreat Bedford County Iron Gate Scott County Big Stone Gap Town of Kenbridge Shenandoah County Botetourt County Lacrosse Shenandoah Retreat Bowling Green Lake Holdiday Estate Smith County Town of Broadway Lake Montcello Stafford County Campbell County Landor Utility Company Stephens City Chesterfield County Lebanon Stone Creek Clintwood Leesburg Strasburg Coeburn Lexington Town of Surry Colonial Beach Loudon County Town of Wakefield Colonial Heights Louisa County Warrenton Crew Town of Luray Town of Waverly Culpepper Lynchburg Winchester Dinwiddie County Manakin Wise Emporia Manassas Woodstock City of Falls Curch Middleton Fauquier County Montgomery County Town of Fincastle Nelson County Floyd County Town of New Market City of Franklin Norton Frederick County Pocahontas City of Fredicksburg Town of Pound Gate City Prince George County Glasgow Prince William County Gloucester County Pulaski County M:\finance\common\sewer-2.wpd February 26, 1996 1 Febuary 27,1996 EXECUTIVE SESSION County staff requests the Board to adopt a motion to enter into executive session within the provisions of the Virginia Freedom of Information Act as follows: (a) to discuss the acquisition of real property from David W. Shelor and Constance R. Shelor for public utility purposes and emergency communications, in accordance with Section 2.1-344.A.3. of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. O~ ~ ANO~F ti• 2 1838 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE MARY H. ALLEN, CMC ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 CLERK TO THE BOARD (7031 772-2005 FAX (703) 772-2193 February 28, 1996 Ms. Shannon M. Brabham 3527 Poplar Drive Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Ms. Brabham: BRENDA J. i-(OLTON DEPUTY CLERK At their regular meeting on Tuesday, February 27, 1996, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved the request of the Child Abuse Prevention Council of Roanoke Valley, Inc. for a raffle permit. The raffle will be conducted on April 6, 1996. The fee has been paid and your receipt is enclosed. You may consider this letter to be your permit, and I suggest it be displayed on the premises where the raffles are to be conducted. The State Code provides that raffle and bingo permits be issued on a calendar-year basis; however, because of recent legislative changes, permits are valid only on the dates in the anolication or until June 30, 1996. The new State legislation, effective July 1, 1996, vested the Charitable Gaming Commission with control of all charitable gaming in the Commonwealth, and repealed the authority for the County's current ordinance regulating bingo and raffles. After July 1, 1996, you can contact the Commissioner of Revenue's office to receive any information they may have about applying for raffle and bingo permits under the new legislation. If I may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 772-2003. Sincerely, ~. ~ Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures cc: Commissioner of the Revenue _Commonwealth Attorney County T~~~surer ®~ ~ ROANp,~~ a z c ~ a? 1838 MARY H. ALLEN, CMC CLERK TO THE BOARD P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2005 FAX (703) 772-2193 February 29, 1996 Ms. Jacqueline L. Shuck Executive Director Roanoke Regional Airport 5202 Aviation Drive Roanoke, VA 24012-1148 Dear Ms. Shuck: BRENDA J. HOLTON DEPUTY CLERK Attached is a copy of Resolution 22796-2 approving the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Budget for FY 1996-97. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, February 27, 1996. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, J Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Attachment cc: Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Bob L. Johnson, Chairman, Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Mary F. Parker, Clerk, Roanoke City Council MEMORANDUM TO: Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Timothy W. Gubala, Secretary, IDA FROM: Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk ,(~~.~,cY~`,t RJ~~ DATE: March 4 , 19 9 6 ~ SUBJECT: REVISION OF ORDINANCES ADOPTED 2/27/96 MEETING It has been brought to my attention that some of the tax map numbers contained in the heading and on the first page of the ordinances listed below were incorrect. Attached is another page one only for each of these ordinances which were adopted by the Board on February 27, 1996: 1. Ordinance 022796-17 (IDA rezoning - Angie Laing) 2. Ordinance 022796-18 (IDA rezoningx - Stranna Arthur) If anyone needs another copy of the entire ordinance, please let me know. Otherwise, please replace each page one with the attached. Thanks for your help. Attachments AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 1996 ORDINANCE 022796-18 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 6.7-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF OGDEN ROAD NORTH OF THE NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD TRACKS (TA% MAP NOS. 77.19-1-4, 77.15-1-12, 77.15-1-13, 77.15-1-14, 77.15-1-15, 77.15-1-16) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R- 3 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2 UPON THE APPLICATION OF THE INDIISTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AIITHORITY OF ROANORE COUNTY (STRANNA ARTHUR) WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on November 21, 1995, and the second reading and public hearing were held December 12, 1995, and continued to February 27, 1996; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on December 5, 1995, and February 6, 1996; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 6.7 acres, as described herein, and located on the west side of Ogden Road north of the Norfolk Southern Railroad tracks (Tax Map Number 77.19-1-4, 77.15-1-12, 77.15-1-13, 77.15-1- 14, 77.15-1-15, 77.15-1-16) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-3, Medium Density Multi-Family Residential District, to the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of The 1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 1996 ORDINANCE 022796-17 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 11.47-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF OGDEN ROAD AT THE TERMINUS OF LESLIE LANE NORTH OF THE NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD TRACKS (TAX MAP NO. 77.19-1-1, 77.19-1-2, 77.19-1-3) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-3 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF THE INDIISTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ROANORE COUNTY (ANGIE LAING) WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on November 21, 1995, and the second reading and public hearing were held December 12, 1995, and continued to February 27, 1996; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on December 5, 1995, and February 6, 1996; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 11.47 acres, as described herein, and located at the terminus of Leslie Lane on the west side of Ogden Road north of the Norfolk Southern railroad tracks (Tax Map Number 77.19-1-1, 77.19-1-2, 77.19-1-3) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-3, Medium Density Multi-Family Residential District, to the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District. 1 0~ AOAN ,~~ ti ~ s- z o a= 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (540) 772-2004 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (540) 772-2193 February 29, 1996 Mrs. Frances R. Holsinger 825 B King James Street Roanoke, VA 24014 Dear Mrs. Holsinger: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BOB L. JOHNSON, CHAIRMAN HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS, VICE-CHAIRMAN VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT" LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FENTON F. "SPIKE" HARRISON, JR CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT" H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (540) 772-2005 The members of the Board of Supervisors wish to express their sincere appreciation for your previous service to the League of Older American Advisory Council. Citizens so responsive to the needs of their community and willing to give of themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce. I am pleased to inform you that, at their meeting held on Tuesday, February 27, 1996, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to reappoint you as a member of the League of Older Americans Advisory Council for another one-year term. Your new term will expire on March 31, 1997. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, or appointed to any public body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act. Your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflict of Interest Act. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Sincerely, Bob L. Johnson hairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors BLJ/bj h Enclosures cc: Executive Director League of Older Americans 706 Campbell Avenue Roanoke, VA 24009 C~~rixx~#~ a~ ~K.a~trta~.e ® Recycled Paper O~ ROAN ,`.~ .. L ti ' .' 9 2 o a 183 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (540) 772-2004 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (540) 772-2193 February 28, 1996 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BOB L. JOHNSON. CHAIRMAN HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS. VICE-CHAIRMAN VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FENTON F. "SPIKE" HARRISON. JR. CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (540) 772-2005 The Reverend Samuel Crews Coopers Cove Baptist Church 3071 Ordway Drive, Apt E Roanoke, VA 24017 Dear Rev. Crews: On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, I would like to thank you for offering the invocation at our meeting on Tuesday, February 27, 1996. We believe it is most important to ask for divine guidance at these meetings and the Board is very grateful for your contribution. Thank you again for sharing your time and your words with us. With kin egards, Bob L. Johns , Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors (~aixx~#~ a~ ~.vttxta~e ®a~.ydae Pam Did get a call from County citizen complaint about people in their neighborhood who were walking their dogs with leashes and come into yard and destroy shrubbery and go on. She asked if there was a penalty for it and me to please advise so that people would know. After checking with County attorn, there is fine for leashed animals on property doing destruction of $20 for first time and second time fine of 20 to 50# and third time fine of 50 to 250. When walk dogs, wait until get home and do it on own property. Motion -- HCN - I would enthusiastic move the staff recommendation for participation as a partner and would suggest that Board members possibly by the next meeting offer suggested nominees for serving on the seven different committees. other discussion BIJ - I take the motion however that we will participate and turn in our nominees or recommendations to the Clerk and assimilate and report to Mr. Fitzpatrick at next meeting. ECH - or you could put those on maybe submit those and we could accumulate them BIJ - consent agenda ECH - put them on the next meeting for consent item CHANGE 0-022786-3 HCN motion to approve participation as partner and Board to offer nominees for serving on the subcommittees by the 3/12/96 meeting i GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED B -~.~~~1CE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, tiIRGINZA of General Amount Fund Revenues Beginning Balance at July 1, 1995 (audited) Addition from 1995-96 Budget 56,994,906 8.09% 10,558 !Sept 12, 1995 Donation to IDA - Rusco ~~ i 27,500) 'Feb 13, 1995 Va Western Community College -site improvements ~ 66,379) ;'Feb 21, 1996 R. R. Donnelley & Sons (2,500,000) Balance at February 27, 1996 54.3 i 1,.585 4.99% Designated for work done to date on Cave Spring ~r X67,000) Designated for debt service on new school capital (:.000,000) 944 585 3.41% ;, Changes below this line are for information and planning pumoses only. These amounts have not been appropriated to fund balance at this time. : ~e increase in projected ,1995-96 revenues is based on the most recent estimate of the year in process, and could be adjusted up ', or down as the year progresses. These funds are not available to be appropriated to other projects at thisi time. Balance from above 52.944,585 Recommended increase in 1995-96 budgeted revenues based upon 6 month review 2,330,183 Designated for debt service of new school capital "760,4;9) '~ 55.014.329 5.80% Mote: On December 18, 1990, the Boazd of Supervisors adopted a goal statement to maintain the General Fund Unappropriated Balance at 6.25% of General Fund Revenues 1995-96 General Fund Revenues 586,464,490 6.25% of General Fund Revenues 55,404,031 Respectfully Submitted, ~~~~ ~. ~ 0 Diane D. Hyatt M:\Finance\Common\Board\Gen95. WK4 Elmer C. Hodge, Administrator Roanoke County P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Dear Elmer: At the New Century Steering Committee meeting on November 8, 1995, we adopted a new structure to move The New Century Council forward. It creates a very inclusive role for citizens and organizations throughout the region. The new structure, as recommended by the Continuity to Assure the Reality of the Vision Committee, places great emphasis on involvement by Partner organizations. These are current groups, like yours, who are well established in the New Century Region. They have been named by our 1,000+ volunteers as organizations whose participation is appropriate to bring the vision to reality. The list of possible Partners is a compilation of all groups recommended in the document that people feel should play a role in making our preferred future come true. To be a Partner, an organization must accept the seven major vision statements adopted by our volunteers and approved by our Board. We have enclosed a copy of the seven vision statements for your review. As a Partner, it is not necessary for you to agree with all 150+ detailed strategies. Each Partner will have the opportunity to nominate representatives to serve on our seven vision committees. Seven out of the ten members on each committee will be from Partner organizations throughout the New Century Region. Between now and February 20, our first priority is to determine which organizations will formally approve the seven visions and become Partners in moving the region forward. We would like to formally ask your Board to become a Partner organization. It would mean a lot to this effort to have Roanoke County working with us to make the region better for all our citizens. Our goal is to move forward, naming our committees and our Partners by the end of February 1996. If you are willing to participate in this leadership effort, please complete the enclosed "Partner Organization Participation Record" and return it to our office as soon as possible. Timing is important, and we do not want anyone to be left out who would like to be a Partner. Post Office Box 18084, Roanoke, Virginia 24014 703 982-3720 ' Elmer C. Hodge, Administrator Roanoke County February 9, 1996 Page 2 We look forward to hearing of your decision to become a Partner so that we, together, can build a better future for our citizens, businesses, and governments in the New Century Region. After deciding to become a Partner, we need you to nominate individuals representing Roanoke County to be on our seven vision implementation committees. The committees are aligned directly with our major topics: Economy, Education, Quality of Life/Environment, Health and Safety, Infrastructure, Governance, and Leadership. Feel free to nominate people to each committee or to those which are of interest to Roanoke County. Please feel free to call us if you have any questions. Our best for a wonderful New Ye~r! Sincerel ~~n-., -'~' ` °~ C~ -~- ~%J~ °- -f~/J ~F.~, . --J y-~~,`-~. ~ ~~ Beverly T. Fitzpatrick, Jr. Director, Roanoke Valley (540) 982-3720 4--~°~ Edwin B. J. Whitmore III Director, New River Valley (540) 231-8931 Enclosures P.S. For your information, following is a list of the Committee Chairs. Economy Committee ............................ William B. Bales Education Committee .... ...... ~ .................. Ronald E. Chaffin Quality of Life Committee ..........................James C. Sears Infrastructure Committee . ...................... S. Kendall Anderson Governance Committee .. .....................John B. Williamson III Leadership Committee ... ...................... Dr. Edwin L. Barnes Health & Safety Committee ........................ Dr. A. Carol Pratt BRENDA: (1) ECH is dictating a memo to the Board to include in the packet. (2) Can you call Bev Fitzpatrick with the following questions about the New Century Partner Board Report. 1. Tell him we didn't get letter until 2/ 14 and can't meet his 2/20 date. 2. Tell him will be on the 2/27 agenda, if he wants to attend meeting. 3. Ask him when they need the nominees? Should they be citizens, staff, or Board Members or any of the above. Mary A. MOVE TO LAST ITEM IN EVENING SESSION y 1. Needs alternatives 1. $1.13 per 2. $1.15 per Needs to include information that Diane has on each tax rate. v 2. Needs schedule for printing, mailing tax bills, and other schedule that Diane already prepared. 3. Why do we have to schedule public hearing for 3/26 -timing, etc. \ _ 4. Need proposed resolution with each alternative attached v 5. Proposed ad should include tax rates for each proposal v 5. No blanks fill in with each alternative refer to attachment 2. Needs staff recommendation: Staff recommends that the Board hold a public hearing on the tax rate on March 26, 1996. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS This may require a WOrk Sessin to reach Board Consensus before determining how to advertise. - For this reason, I am placing the item in the evening after the Budget Work Session. Diane: ECH has memo he wants you to review before it goes to the Board AMG: Anticipate questions Board/media might have. ECH WANTS THE BOARD TO HAVE SET THE TAX RATE BY THE END OF THE EVENING. THAT'S WHY HE WANTS ALL THE ALTERNATIVES, ETC. pF ~~ N '~F i i ~ A ~' °~ a2 C~~a~xx~# ~~ ~~xx~~.~.~e 1838 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE MARY H. ALLEN, CMC ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 CLERK TO THE BOARD (703) 772-2005 FAX (703) 772-2193 January 30, 1996 Mr. Douglas Moncure Butler Director of Investor Relations Roanoke Valley Economic Development Partnership 111 Franklin Plaza Suite 333 Roanoke, V A 24011 Dear Mr. Butler: BRENDA J. HOLTON DEPUTY CLERK Thank you for your letter of January 19, 1996 requesting time on the Board of Supervisors agenda in February. I have scheduled the Economic Development Partnership's report for 3:00 p.m. on Tuesday, February 13. 1996. If you have any information that you wish the Board to receive prior to the meeting, please send it to me by Wednesday, February 7. Also, please let me know who will be making the presentation so we may add his or her name to the agenda. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors --`-`_` ~ b ~ l,-~~ ~ ~'~C ~~ , 1~~~ c~ i /~ ® Recyded Paper Elmer: The Economic Development Partnership would like to give an update on their activities at one of the bruary meetings. Which one do you prefer? February 13 5~-r~ cC- February 27 l ~ -~-L~ Pte' Mary Allen 1/25/96 t 4 i Elmer: The Economic Development Partnership would like to give an update on their activities at one of the February meetings. Which one do you prefer? February 13 February 27 Mary Allen 1/25/96 s~•-~d 1 e ~f ~r G-F ~ e~r- Gh~ c% ~~r~c' `~J ~ :~:;u;= ---..._.. _, ~.~_ ._.,,. _ _ _. ._ s January 19, 1996 Ms. Mary Allen Roanoke County P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24G i 8 Dear Ms. Allen: A representative from the Roanoke Valley Economic Development Partnership would like to be put on the agenda for a February Board of Supervisors' meeting. We would like to give an update on Partnership activity. Please let me know the date and time so I can put it on our calendar. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, ----_ . c-- ~°~ ~~~e~y ,~ Douglas Moncure ~3~ ~~ \ ~ utler - ~ Director of Investor Relations 111 FRANKLIN PLAZA, SUITE 333 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24011 5 4 0- 3 4 3- 1 5 5 0 1- 8 0 0- L O C A T E 2 FAX: 540-344-6096 FEB-24-1996 16 39 • Bobt Johnson, Chairman Kit B. Kiser, Vice Chairman Claude N, 5mlth James M. Turner, Jr. Arthur M. Whittaker, Sr. ROA REGIONAL AIRPORT GOMM Jacqueline L. Shuck, Executive Director Honorable Chairman and Members Roanoke Couaty Board of Supervisors Roanoke, Virginia Dear Gentlemen: 7035634638 P.O2~O5 ~~U~ Avlc7tiOn Urive Roanoke. Vir~irlia 24012-114$ (540)$62-1444 FAX (540) 543-4838 February 14, 1996 .~ ~ u~ss wL ~~~ I N rY1ar~ ,G~ ! 1 ~n Re: Roanoke Regional Axxpart Commission Fiscal Year 199b-97 Budget and Proposed Capital Expenditures In accordance with the requirements of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Act, and the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Contract dated January 2$, 19$7', submitted for your approval is the Airport Commission's 199b-97 proposed Operating and Capital Purchases Budget, as well as a separate listing of proposed capital expenditures which are expected to exceed $100,000 and are intended to benefit five or more future accounting periods. The Commission 1~as been advi ' ' ~ F the budget by resolution of each of the participate ~ ate. 'The capital expenditure list also requires fo ~ , I will be pleased to respond to E ~ ~ < re with regard to this matter. Gn behalf of the ` ,~} - r help and cooperation. a ~J ~¢ (, 4' _L -~ J ~, i~ (~ r I I '~ / ` ' v JLS:csp Enclosures cc: Chairn~aa and Members, Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk, Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Paul M. Mahoney, Roanoke County Attorney Mark Allan Williams, General Counsel, Roanoke Regional Airport Commission cap024196.h CommlkMer 08-Feb-96 ATTACHMENTI R AN KE RE I NAL AI MMI I N FOR YEAR 1996-97 BUDGET 1995-96 Budgeted 1996-97 Budgeted EXPENSE BUDGET Expenditures Expenditures 1. Operations and Maintenance Expenses A. Salaries, Wages and Benefits $1,610,850 $1,698,021 B. Operating Expenditures 1,833,310 1,916,760 C. Other Projects 48,500 40,000 Total Operations and Maintenance 3,492,660 3,654,781 2. Non-Operating Expenses A. Interest 555,571 542,616 B. Debt Service 273,226 289,677 Total Non-Operating 828,797 832,293 3. Capital Expenses A. Capital Projects and Purchases 78,100 245,225 Total Capital Expenses 78,100 245,225 Total Budgeted Expenditures $4,399,557 $4,732,299 1995-96 Projected 1996-97 Projected REVENUE PROJECTIONS Revenues Revenues 1. Operating Revenues A. Airfield $824,295 $977,738 B. General Aviation 103,112 101,552 C. Terminal Related 2,990,407 3,273,903 D. Other Revenues 213,718 225,790 Total Projected Operating Revenues 4,131,532 4,578,982 2. Non-Operating Revenues A. Interest from Debt Service 28,000 40,000 B. Interest on Irnestments 250,000 425,000 C. Roanoke County Base Service Fee 264,640 0 Total Projected Non-Operating Revenues 542,640 465,000 Total Projected Revenue $4,674,172 $5,043,982 ATTACHMENT II Proposed Capital Expenditures (For projects expected to exceed $100,000 in cost and intended to benefit five or more accounting periods) A. Projects 1. Purchase and Install Caroeting in Terminal a.) D. escriFtion: Purchase and install approximately 3300 square yards of carpeting as replacement for carpeting in public areas of the terminal building. b.) 3ustification: The carpeting in the public areas of the terminal building will have been in place for almost eight years at the end of the 1996-97 fiscal year. Heavy usage has caused it to wear out in some areas and reach the point where it no longer can be satisfactorily cleaned. Estimated Cost: $150,000.00 2. Construction of Ai~eld Mai_nte~ncp a_nd Storage Building a.) Demotion: Construct an airfield maintenance and storage building of sufficient size to store and maintain all snow removal and other airfield maintenance equipment, vehicles and supplies, and to provide office, lockers and break room space for airfield maintenance personnel. b.) Justification: Airfield maintenance personnel are housed in a 1940's building which is slated for demolition. Some snow removal and other maintenance equipment is stored in a World War II quonset but which is largely unheated; the rest of the equipment and vehicles, and some supplies are stored outside without protection. In order to maintain and protect equipment, supplies and personnel, especially during snow events, an airfield maintenance and storage building is required. Estimated Cost: $1,400,000.00 B. Funding Sources Federal AIP Grant Funds -0- State Aviation Grant Funds $1,000,000.00 Commission Funds 550,000.00 City and County Funds -0- Estimated Total Projects Funding $1,550,000.00 ap0?,0896.h Comm~auachII.bYt RESOLUTION OF THE ROANOKE REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION Adopted this 14th day of February 1996 No. 01-021496 A RESOLUTION approving and adopting the Commission's Operating and Capital Purchase Budget for fiscal year 1996-97. BE IT RESOLVED by the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission that the fiscal year 1996-97 Operating and Capital Purchase Budget for the Commission as set forth in the report and accompanying attachment by the Executive Director dated February 14, 1996, is hereby approved; BE Tf FINALLY RESOLVED that the Executive Director is authorized on behalf of the Commission to submit the fiscal year 1996-97 Operating and Capital Purchase Budget, as well as a list of Proposed Capital Expenditures, to the Roanoke City Council and the'Roanoke County Board of Supervisors for approval pursuant to the contract between the Commission, Roanoke City and Roanoke County dated January 28, 1987. ATTEST: S , , , , . ! .S i~ f' ~~ ,, r. i;~ ,ti ~ ~t~ ~' - i1 '7 -~ ~l , ~ - ~ ' ~> .. ~ , 1 -'S'am.. f n/v1 I'~ ATTACHMENT I P3, #6: To promote, advocate, and assist in the development of a coordinated service system in the Roanoke Valley geared to the early identification, treatment, and prevention of child abuse and neglect. ~, /L~ •~ a ,, ATTACHMENT II Internal Revenue Service District Director Date: 2 2 ,lUN 1979 ~ Child Abuse and Neglect Coordinating Coucil of Roanoke Valley, Inc. 518 Carlton Terrace Building, 920 S. Jefferson Street Roanoke, Virginia 24016 Dear Applicant: Department of the Treasury Employer Identification Number: mil- aa3~~1 Accounting Period Ending: December 31 '` Foundatio>>n//Status Classi/!ficalltion: r as °9~e Rul ng Period Endsi (1) (A) (v . December•31, 1980 Pennon to Contact: E. Merriken Contact Telephone Number: (301) 962-3479 Based on information supplied, and assuming your operations will be as stated in your application for recognition of exemption, we have determined you are exempt from Federal income tax under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Because you are a newly created organization, we are not now making a final determination of your foundation status under section 509(a) of the Code. However, we have determined that you can reasonably be expected to be a publicly supported organization described in section 5Og(a)(1) & 17O(b)(1)(A)(vi). Accordingly, you will be treated as a publicly supported organization, and not as a private foundation, during an advance ruling period. This advance ruling period begins on the date of your inception and ends on the date shown above. Within 90 days after the end of your advance ruling period, you must submit to us information needed to determine whether you have met the requirements of the applicable support test during the advance ruling period. If you establish that you have been a publicly supported organization, you will be classified as a section 509(a)(1) or 509(a)(2) organization as long as you continue to meet the requirements of the applicable support test. If you do not meet the public support requirements during the advance ruling period, you will be classified as a private foundation for future periods. Also, if you are classified as a private foundation, you will be treated as a private foundation from the date of your inception for purposes of sections 507(d) and 4940. Grantors and donors may rely on the determination that you are not a private foundation until 90 days .after the end of your advance ruling period. If~you submit the required information within the 90 days, grantors and donors may continue to rely on the advance determination until the Service makes a final determination of your foundation status.. However, if notice that you will no longer be treated as a section ~ organization is published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin, grantors and donors may not rely on this determination after the date of such publication. Also, a grantor or donor may not rely on this determination if he or she was in part responsible for, or was aware of, the act or failure to act that resulted in your loss of section ~• status, or acquired knowledge that the Internal Revenue Service had given notice that you would be removed from classification as a section * organization. P. O. Box 13163, Baltimore, MD 21203 ~O1"~ Letter 1O45(DO) (6-7 ., If your sources of support, or your purposes, character, or method of operation change, please let us know so we can consider the effect of_the change on your exempt status and foundation status. Also, you should inform us of all changes in your name or address. Generally, you are not liable for social security (FICA) taxes unless you file a waiver of exemption certificate as provided in the Federal Insurance Contributions Act. If you have paid FICA taxes without filing the waiver, you should call us. You are not liable for the tax imposed under the Federal Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA). Organizations that are not private foundations are not subject to the excise taxes under Chapter 42 of the Code. However, you are not automatically exempt from other Federal excise taxes. If you have any questions about excise,- employment, or other Federal taxes, please let us know. Donors may deduct contributions to you as provided in section 170 of the Code. Bequests, legacies, devises, transfers, or gifts to you or for your use are deductible for Federal estate and gift tax purposes if they meet the applicable provisions of sections 2055, 2106, and 2522 of the Code. You are required to-file Form .990, Return of Organization Exempt from Income Tax, only if 'your gross receipts each year are normally more than $10,000. If a return is required, it must be`filed by the 15th day of the fifth month after the end of your annual accounting period. The law imposes a penalty of $10 a day, up to a maximum of $5,000, when a return is filed late, unless there is reasonable cause for the delay. You are not required~to file Federal income tax returns unless you are subject to the tax on unrelated business income under section 511 of the Code. If you are subject to this -tax, you must file an income tax return°on Form 990-T. In this letter, we are not determining whether any of your present or proposed activities are unrelated trade or business as defined in section 513 of the Code. You need an employer identification number even if you-have no employees. If an employer identification number was not entered on your application, a number will be assigned to you and you will be advised of it. Please use that number on all returns you file and in all correspondence with the Internal Revenue Service. Because this letter could help resolve any questions about your exempt status and foundation status, you should keep it in your permanent records. If you have any questions, please contact the person whose name and telephone number are shown in the heading of this letter. (See attached caveats erely yours, District Director Letter 1045(DO) (6-7: Internal Revenue Service District Director Date: v~V~. 0 g lj~~ p Child Abuse and Neglect Coordination Council of Roanoke Valley, Inc. 518 Carlton Terrace Bldg. 920 S. Jefferson St. Roanoke, VA 24016 Department of the Treasury Our Letter Dated: June 22, 1979 Person to Contact: R, Reuling Contact Telephone Number. (301) 962-4774 This modifies our letter of the above date in which we stated that you would be treated as an organization which is not a private foundation until the expiration of your advance ruling period. Based on the information you submitted, we have determined that you are not a private foundation within the meaning of section 509(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, because you are an organization of the type described in section *See Below Your exempt status under section 501(c)(3) of the code is still in effect. Grantors and contributors may rely on this determination until the Internal Revenue Service publishes notice to the contrary. However, a grantor or a contributor may not rely on this determination if he or she was in part responsible for, or was aware of, the act or failure to act that resulted in your loss of section *See Below status, or acquired knowledge that the Internal Revenue .Service had given notice that you would be removed from classification as a section *See Below organization. Because this letter could help resolve any questions about your private foundation status, please keep it in your permanent records. If you have any questions, please contact the person whose name and telephone number are shown above. *509(a)(1) & 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) Sincerely yours, ~` Teddy R. Kern District Director 31 Hopkins Plaza, Baltimore, Md. 21201 Letter 1050 (DO) (7-77) -2- Child Abuse and Neglect Coordinating Council of Roanoke Valley, Inc. You requested a definitive ruling of your foundation status under section 509(a) of the Code. The Regulations concerning section 509(a) require an organization to have completed a first taxable year of at least 8 months. Your organization was orginally by the adoption of your Bylaws on June 28, 1978, and your first taxable year ended December 31, 1978. Since that year was less than 8 months, a definitive ruling under section 509(a) cannot be made at this time. We have issued an Advance Ruling, however, as indicated in the heading of this letter. If you do not accept our findings, we recommend that you request a conference with a member_ of our Regional Office of Appeals. Your request for a conference should in- clude a written appeal giving the faots, law, and any other information to support your position as explained in the enclosed Publication 892. You will then be con- tacted to arrange a date .for a conference. The conference may be held at the Regiona. Office or, if you request, at any mutually convenient District office. If we do not hear from you within 30 days of the date of this letter, this determination will become final. This determination also extends to your unincorporated predecessor organization forme' on June 28, 1978. L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their 7:00 p.m. session on Tuesday, February 27, 1996, in the Board / Meeting Room at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive S.W. on the petition of Mr. Jeffrey W. and Cheryl A. Hodges requesting vacation of 4 lots (16, 17, 18 & 19) in the Hidden Valley Subdivision as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 2, and located in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. A copy of the documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Engineering and Inspections, located at the Roanoke County Administration Center. Given under my hand this seventh day of February, 1996. .~~-`~ ~ , Mary H. Allen, CMC, Clerk to the Board Roanoke County Board of Supervisors PLEASE PUBLISH IN THE ROANOKE TIMES ON: Tuesday, February 13, 1996 Tuesday, February 27, 1996 Direct the bill for publication to: Jeffrey W. & Cheryl A. Hodges 5757 Enchanted Lane Roanoke, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, February 27, 1996, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Robert and I.R. Stverak to rezone 1.448 acres from I-1 conditional to I-1 to permit light industrial use, located at 6152 Twine Hollow Road, Catawba Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: February 7, 1996 ~• Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times Tuesday, February 13, 1996 Tuesday, February 20, 1996 Direct the bill for publication to: Robert & I.R. Stverak c/o Ed Natt Osterhoudt Ferguson Natt Aheron & Agee P.O. Box 20068 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 774-1197 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BO% 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, February 27, 1996, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Dental Prosthetics Inc. for a Special Use Permit to allow a dental laboratory at 2121 Electric Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: February 7 , 1996 ,,.~ / J'° Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times Tuesday, February 13, 1996 Tuesday, February 20, 1996 Direct the bill for publication to: Dental Prosthetic Inc. Attn: Jack Smith 1736 Memorial Ave. Roanoke, VA 24015 (540) 345-4941 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018 ~~ . LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, February 27, 1996, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Bedford Continuous Guttering Inc. to rezone 1.40 acres from C-2C to I-2C to permit a contractors storage yard at 2032 Hardy Road, Vinton Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: February 7, 1996 ~ `, Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times Tuesday, February 13, 1996 Tuesday, February 20, 1996 Direct the bill for publication to: Bedford Continuous Guttering Inc. c/o Ed Natt Osterhoudt Ferguson Natt Aheron & Agee P.O. Box 20068 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 774-1197 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, February 27, 1996, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of the Roanoke County Planning Commission to amend Sections 30-54-2(A)2 and 30-54-2(B)1 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance to allow halfway houses only by Special Use Permit in C-2 General Commercial Districts. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: February 7, 1996 ~ l J'~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times Tuesday, February 13, 1996 Tuesday, February 20, 1996 Direct the bill for publication to: Roanoke County Planning Department PO Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, February 27, 1996, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the following petitions: 1. Petition of Industrial Development Authority (Angie Laing) to rezone 11.47 acres from R-3 to C-2 to allow commercial uses, located on the west side of Ogden Road at the terminus of Leslie Lane, north of NS Railroad tracks, Cave Spring Magisterial District. 2. Petition of Industrial Development Authority (Stranna Arthur) to rezone 6.7 acres from R-3 to C-2 to allow commercial uses, located on the west side of Ogden Road, north of the NS Railroad tracks, Cave Spring Magisterial District. Copies of the applications are available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: February 7, 1996 ~. .~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times Tuesday, February 13, 1996 Tuesday, February 20, 1996 Direct the bill for publication to: Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County c/o Ed Natt PO Box 20068 Roanoke, VA 24018 (540) 774-1197 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANORE COIINTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Pursuant to Section 33.1-70.01 of the Code of Virginia, 1990, as amended, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, jointly with representatives of the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) will conduct a Public Hearing on the 1996-2002 Roanoke County Secondary System Six-Year Plan. This Public Hearing shall also be for a review of the budget for the expenditure of improvement funds for fiscal year 1996-97. The Public Hearing is scheduled for Tuesday, February 27, 1996 at 7:00 p.m. in the County Board of Supervisors Room at the Roanoke County Administration Building. Complete copies of the Six-Year Plan and 1996-97 budget are available for inspection at the office of the Director of Engineering & Inspections and at VDOT's Salem Residency Office. Mary H. Allen, Clerk to the Board PLEASE PUBLISH IN THE ROANOKE TIMES ON: TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 13, 1996 TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 20, 1996 3 : a o ,~~ Direct the bill for publication to: Mary H. Allen, Clerk to the Board Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 RKE BOARD SUPERVISORS TEL~703-~72-2193 Transmit Confirmation Report No . Receiver Transmitter Date Time Mode Pages Result 003 9-f981-•'3415 RKE BOARD SUPERVISORS Feb 06'96 1520 01'19 Norm 02 OK Feb 06'96 15 20 FAX TRANSMITTAL FAX NUMBER: (703) 772-2193 DATE: February 6, 1996 TO: Legal Notices COMPANY: Roanoke Times & World News FAX NUMBER: 98~ - ~3 ~/,~' NO. OF PAGES TO FOLLOW: 1 FROM: MARY H. ALLEN, CLERK TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS # TO CALL IF TRANSMITTAL IS INCOMPLETE: 772-2003 SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: Please publish the attached legal notice on Tuesday, february 13, 1996 and Tuesday, February 20, 1996. (540)981 02!09/96 The Roanoke Times Paytype BL Rate Legals ~ Re 46 ............. ........ _p .~. . .. •....... . ._ ...._.... ...... . Source FX . _ ..... . _.... _..._ Class 1 0 Legals .. ......... ^ TFN Start 02!13!96 Issues 2 Rate Iss ~ Stop 02/20/96 0 Words..... 132 price 101.50 0 Lines....... 35 Discount 0.00 p Depth..... 0.00 Free Day 0 0 Graphic... 0 Net 101.50 St Words. 0 St Tax 0.00 0 ^ Boxed Ad Fed Tax 0.00 Copy Line NOTI CE OF PUBLIC HE Total 1 01 .50 Sort String Kill Cr .0 Manu_a...l.. Sart ar Sheets Te...... ....... .......... ..... ^ Movable: Editions .... Product Cade PO # ..... ~ CE ^ Receipt .......... ......... ... ^ KiII Ad .. FR Comments Reason for Discount € JO € NR : REM ..... ........... ...,.... . ...... _. . ~ .......... .. .... ........... .._..... RM ~ RN ,/ DC NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Pursuant to Section 33.1 - 70.01 of the Code of Virginia, 1990, es emended, the Roanola County Board of Supervi tors, jointly with repre- sentati yes of the Virginia Departs gent of Tronspor}stion (Y DOT) will conduct a Public Hearing on 4he 1996.2002 Roanoke County Secondary System Six-year an. This Pub• lit Hearing shell also be for a review of the budget for the expenditure of improvement funds for fiscal year 1996.97. The Public Nearing is zthed uled for Tuesday, February 27, 1996 at 7:00 p m. in khe County Board of Supervisors Room at the Roanoke County Adminiztrotion Building. Com• plats copies of the Six-Year Plan end 1996.97 budget are awilabls for inspection at the office of the Director of Engi nearing & Inspections end at VDOT's Salem Residency Office. Mary H. Allen, Clark to the Board (324124) Adid: 3241 2~ .~~ ~F ROANp~-~ ~ A Z~ ~~ ~ _ v ".a rasa DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE February 14, 1996 Ms. Martha Plank Roanoke Times & World News Legal Advertisement Department 201-209 Campbell Avenue, SW Roanoke, VA 24011 Dear Martha: PAUL E. GRICE, CPA ASSISTANT DIRECTOR Please publish the enclosed public notice as a block advertisement on Tuesday, February 20, 1996. Bill the cost of publication to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors at the following address: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors ATTN: Mary Allen P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 I would like to review the proof when completed. My fax number is 772-2186;phone is 772- 2021. Thank you. Sincerely, ~~~~_ L W. Brent Robertson Budget Manager Enclosure c: Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Mary Allen, Clerk to the Board Anne Marie Green, Director, Community Relations Elmer Hodge, County Administrator M:\financelbudgetladvertise\pubhear.ad February 14, 1996 P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 • (540) 772-2023 FAX: (540) 772-2186 ® Recyded Paper DIANE D. HYATT, CPA DIRECTOR COUNTY OF ROANOKE PUBLIC HEARING CITIZEN INPUT FOR THE 1996-97 BUDGET The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County invites citizens of Roanoke County to offer written or oral comment for items to be included in the budget for the 1996-97 fiscal year. An informational public hearing, to receive citizen comment, will be held on Tuesday, February 27, 1996 at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as may be heard, at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, S . W . , Roanoke, Virginia. All interested citizens are invited to attend this meeting. M:\finance\budget\advertise\pubhear.ad February 14, 1996 . ~ LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, February 27, 1996, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Christian Life Fellowship Pentecostal Holiness Church for a Special Use Permit to construct a religious assembly facility, located at the intersection of Route 11 and State Route 777, Catawba Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: February 7, 1996 ~- Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times Tuesday, February 13, 1996 Tuesday, February 20, 1996 Direct the bill for publication to: Christian Life Fellowship Pentecostal Holiness Church Attn: Mark Atkinson 307 North Bruffy St. Salem, VA 24153 (540) 928-0267 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018