Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
3/26/1996 - Regular
OAN ,~, F 2 9 2 a 1 g ~n ff na cur roa C~~zxxtt~ a~ ~.o~~xxt~~tE WORKING DOCUMENT -,SUBJECT TO REVISION ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION AGENDA MARCH 26, 1996 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. Indlvlduals with dlsabllitles who require asslstance or special arrangement In order to partlclpate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings or other programs and actlvifles sponsored 6y Roanoke County, please contact the Clerk to the Board at (703) 772-2005 We request that you provide at least 48- hours notice so that proper arrangements may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. ALL PRESENT AT 3:01 P.M 2. Invocation: Dr. Michael Nevling Colonial Presbyterian Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance- to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS PMM ADDED 3 EXECUTIVE SESSION ITEMS (11 LEGAL MATTER,, i ®R~,, ~~ BOUNDARY ADTUSTMENT WITH SALEM; (2) REAL ESTATE MATTER, SURPLUS WELL LOTSa (3) PERSONNEL MATTER C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Proclamation declaring the month of April 1996 as Child Abuse Prevention Month in Roanoke County. FM MOTION TO ADOPT PROCLAMATION - URC SHANNON BRABHAM FROM CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION COUNCIL ACCEPTED D. BRIEFINGS E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Resolution supporting the Virginia Department of Transportation Six Year Primary Road Plan. (Arnold Covey, Director of Engineering & Inspections) R-032696-1 HCN MOTION TO ADOPT RESO AMENDED WITH SUGGESTED CHANGES BY LBE. WITH PRIORITIZATION OF UNFUNDED PROTECTS AS SUGGESTED BY LBE AND WITH ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE REQUESTING THAT THE STATE EXPAND THEIR POOL OF AVAIIABLE STATEWIDE FUNDS IN THE FUTURE. AYES-LBE,HCN,BI;T NAYS-FM,SH 2. Request for approval of the 1996/97 RVTV budget for. (Anne Marie Green, Director of Community Relations) A-032696-2 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE BUDGET URC F. OLD BUSINESS a G. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS ECH REQUESTED BUDGET WORD SESSION. BOARD CONSENSUS TO SET FOR 4/11/96 AT 3:00 P.M H. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS I. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA LBE MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING AND SET 2ND READING AND PUBLIC HEARINGS FOR 4/23/96 - URC 1. Ordinance to amend conditions on an existing Special Use Permit located at the intersection of Williamson Road and Summer View Drive, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Summerview Creekside. 2. Ordinance to rezone 1.0 acre from I-2 to C-2 and obtain a Special Use Permit in order to construct a used car lot, located at the intersection of West Main Street and Country Farm Road, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Randy Vest. 3. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to expand William Byrd High School, located at 2902 Washington Avenue, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of the Roanoke County School Board. 4. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to expand an existing equipment sales and service establishment located at 7549 Williamson Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Ace Sales, Inc. 5. Ordinance to rezone 88.53 acres from AG-3 to PCD, planned commercial development to allow commercial and 3 recreational uses, located on the east side of the Blue Ridge Parkway at the north side of parkway bridge wer the Roanoke River at Niagara Dam, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of the Industrial Development Authority (Al Hammond) J. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizing the acquisition of a permanent easement from David W. Shelor and Constance R Shelor for access to the E-911 radio tower site on Fort Lewis Mountain and of a County water tank and the corneyance of surplus property containing 5.25 acres to David and Constance Shelor. (Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney) BI;T MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND READING - 4/9/96 AYES-FM,SH,HCN,BI.~T NAYS-LBE K. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance amending Article IV, Sewer Use Standards, Chapter 18, Sewer and Sewage Disposal of the Roanoke County Code. (Gary Robertson, Utility Director) 0-032696-3 FM MOTION TO APPROVE ORD. URC L. APPOINTMENTS 1. Blue Ridge Community Services HCN ASKED MHA TO CONTACT BLUE RIDGE CO SERVICES BOARD TO SEE IF INDIVIDUAL HAS BEEN REC011~IlViENDED. 4 2. Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals 3. Highway and Transportation Safety Commission LBE HAS RECEIVED APPLICATION AND WILL OFFER NOMINATION AT 4/9/96 MEETING 4. Roanoke Valley Regional Stormwater Management Citizens Advisory Committee LBE WITI~IDREW HIS RECONIlVIENDATIONS IN FAVOR OF APPOINTING CITIZENS WITH NO "SPECIAL INTEREST" IN THE ISSUE. M. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. R-032696-4 BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE CONSENT RESO WITH ITEM 3 REMOVED FOR SEPARATE VOTE. URC 1. Approval of Minutes -January 23, 1996, February 13, 1996, February 21, 1996, February 27, 1996, March 4, 1996. 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals, and the New Century Council Vision Implementation Committees. A-032696-4.a 3. Approval of a Bingo Permit for the Vinton Moose Lodge #1121. s A-032696-4.b FM MOTION TO APPROVE URC 4. Acceptance of water facilities serving Steak and Ale - 419. A-032696-4.c 5. Acceptance of water facilities serving The Village, Phase III. A-032696-4.d 6. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Oakcliff Townhomes. A-032696-4.e 7. Acceptance of sanitary sewer facilities serving April's Meadow Subdivision. A-032696-4.f 8. Approval of a Raffle Permit for the Glen Cove Elementary School PTA. A-032696-4. g 9. Approval of a Raffle Permit for North Cross School. A-032696-4.h N. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS Suuetvisor Nickens: Asked about progress receiving the admissions tax from the Moose Lodge. PMM responded that paperwork will be sent to Clerk of Circuit Court's Office this week. Supervisor Eddv: (1) Announced that he and Don Myers attended the Urban Partnershiu on Friday, 3/22/96. Advised they will be requesting funds to continue organization on part-time basis through the next year. (2) Announced that as Dart of the 4/20/96 Earth Day celebration, a walk is 6 being sponsored to the Blue Ridge Parkway and back to Mill Mountain. (3) Advised he has received a memo from the Planning Department advising of the Planning Commission's 1996 priorities and agreed with their choices. ~4) Asked about status of east County survey. ECH advised that it should be complete by the end of March. (~ Asked about progress on the policy manual. PMM advised he has discussed with Mary Hicks and they are planning to reduce paperwork and make it more "user friendly_~6~ Attended the Clean Valley Council Board meeting and advised the group is working on a five year program. During recycling discussion, it was suggested that recycling be done by private sector collection. Supervisor Minnix: (1) Received call from a licensed painter who was concerned about other painters advertising in violation of the sign ordinance. Asked Planning and Zoning staff to continue to pick up signs. BIJ suggested they notify the company that they are picking u the signs. (2) Asked for assistance from staff in aiding an individual to gain legal access to his daughter's property so her bank loan can be approved. Supervisor Harrison: (1) Attended several meetings of civic groups in west County where he heard concerns regarding the construction of the North Loop water line. Advised he would keep Gary Robertson advised of the complaints. Supervisor Tohnson: Advised he has received complaints of trash cans blowing around in the wind and damaging vehicles and other private property. Since these are County mandated and owned trash cans, asked if the County could weight them or assist the citizens whose property has been damaged. Bill Rand responded that staff would try and find ways to resolve the problem. O. CITIZENS' CONIIVIENTS AND COMIVILJNICATIONS NONE P. REPORTS FM MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE AFTER DISCUSSION OF ITEMS 1 AND 6. AND ITEM 7 REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION IN BUDGET WORK SESSION-UW 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Statement of Estimated Revenues and Expenditures as of February 29, 1996. 5. Accounts Paid -February 1996 6. Additions to the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System in February 1996. HCN ASKED FOR UPDATE ON VINYARD PARK ACCESS ROAD. 7. Update on legislation during the 1996 Session of the General Assembly. REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION AT BUDGET WORK SESSION Q. WORK SESSION 1. Budget Work Session a. Update on legislation during the 1996 Session of the General Assembly. BOARD CONSENSUS TO CONSIDER EMPLOYING LOBBYIST DURING GENERAL ASSEMBLY SESSION. BOARD CONSENSUS TO SET UP MEETING WITH ROANOKE VALLEY LEGISLATORS IN Tl~]NE OR TLTLY TO DISCUSS ISSUES. STAFF TO BRING BACK BPOL PLAN THAT WOULD BE REVENUE NEUTRAL HCN REQUESTED THAT DR RUTLEDGE ATTEND WORK SESSION TO DISCUSS HEALTH DEPT, BUDGET. s b. GIP Projects BRENT ROBERTSON PRESENTED RESULTS OF CIP PROTECT RANI~NG. JOYCE WAUGH PRESENTED INFORMATIONAL FACT SHEET ON THE BLUE RIDGE INTERPRETATION CENTER SPENCER WATTS DESCRIBED NEED FOR ADDITIONAL ACCESS TERMINALS AT BRANCH LIBRARIES. c. Utility CIP Projects GR PRESENTED PROPOSAL THAT COUNTY WOULD PROVIDE PORTION OF FUNDS TO EXISTING NEIGHBORHOODS TO COVER COST OF WATER AND SEWER CONNECTION FEES. STAFF TO REVIEW AND BRING BACK ANALYSIS. d. NOT DISCUSSED e. NOT DISCUSSED Review of Budget Calendar Adoption of Rollover Policy R. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (7) TO DISCUSS A LEGAL MATTER, POTENTIAL LITIGATION, PROPOSED BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT WITH CITY OF SALEM; (1) PERSONNEL MATTER, PERFORMANCE AND COMPENSATION; AND (3) REAL ESTATE MATTER, SALE OF SURPLUS WELL LOTS. FM MOTION TO GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION AT 6:15 P.M. RETURNED TO OPEN SESSION AT 6:50 P.M. S. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION R-032696-6 HCN MOTION TO RETURN TO OPEN SESSION AT 7:03 P.M. AND ADOPT CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION. EVENING SESSION 9 T. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS U. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Public Hearing to elicit citizen comments on the following matters: (Brent Robertson, Budget Manager) a. Public Hearing to set a real estate tax rate of not more than $1.13 per $100 assessed valuation, and the "effective" real estate tax increase as a result of increased assessed value of real estate. NO PEOPLE SPOKE b. Adoption of Order to set a real estate tax rate of not more than $1.13 per $100 assessed valuation. 0-032696-7 HCN MOTION TO ADOPT ORDER SETTING TAX RATE URC c. Public Hearing to set a personal property tax rate of not more than $3.50 per $100 assessed valuation and a machinery and tools tax rate of not more than $3.00 per $100 assessed valuation. NO PEOPLE SPOKE d. Adoption of order to set a personal property tax rate of not more than $3.50 per $100 assessed valuation and a machinery and tools tax rate of not more than $3.00 per $100 assessed valuation. 0-032696-8 FM MOTION TO ADOPT SETTING TAX RATE URC V. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES io 1. Ordinance to rezone 315+ acres from R-1, AG-1, and AR to PRD, planned residential development to construct residential homes and commercial services, located on Cotton Hill Road, east and west of the Blue Ridge Parkway, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Boone, Boone & Loeb, Inc. (Janet Scheid, Planning & Zoning) 0-032696-9 BDT MOTION TO ADOPT ORD. WITH ALTERNATIVE #1 AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE AS SUGGESTED BY PMM AYES-LBE,SH,HCN,BI;T NAYS-FM 2. 0-032696-10 HCN MOTION TO ADOPT ORD. URC 3. Ordinance to rezone 1.07 acres from C-2 to I-1 to construct offices and warehouse for pharmaceutical supplies at 7605 Robertson Lane, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of HCMF Corp. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 0-032696-11 LBE MOTION TO DEFER DECISION TO 4/9/96 TO ALLOW PETITIONER TO OFFER ADDITIONAL PROFFERED CONDITIONS AYES-LBE NAYS-FM,SH,HCN ABSTAIN-BI;T HCN MOTION TO ADOPT ORD.WITH PROFFERED CONDITIONS AND THE UNDERSTANDING THAT BALZER AND ASSOC. WILL CREATE A PLEASING FACADE ON THE BUILDING. AYES-~,FM.SH~HCN Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to expand an existing manufactured home park, located at 5188 Yellow Mountain Road, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of Mountain Irnestors Corp. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) ii NAYS~~ cog ABSTAIN-BI;T 4. Ordinance vacating a 10 foot Public Utility Easement, located along the north property line of Lot 9, Section 1, Country Hills, recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 65, located in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District upon the petition of Paul A. and Cynthia W. Reburn. (Arnold Cavey, Director of Engineering & Inspections) 0-032696-12 LBE MOTION TO ADOPT ORD. URC THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC HEARING HAS BEEN CONTINUED BY THE PLANNING COIVIlVIISSION 1. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to expand the existing church and school facilities, located on Williamson Road across from Brookside Shopping Center, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Shenandoah Baptist Church. W. CITIZEN COMII~NTS AND COINIlVIUIVICATIONS NONE X. ADJOURNMENT BI;T DECIARED ADTOURNMENT AT 830 P M. 12 ~ ROAN ,~,~ L . A a 1838 C~.a~tz~#~ ~f ~..a~x~~.~.e ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA MARCH 26, 1996 /ff~1RJ 6 IflE FLUE AQX"F Welcome to the Roanoke County Board .of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement in order to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings or other programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County, please contact the C-erk to the Board at (703) 772-2005. We request that you provide at least 48- hours notice so that proper arrangements may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: Dr. Michael Nevling Colonial Presbyterian Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCIAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS i ® Recycled Paper 1. Proclamation declaring the month of April 1996 as Child Abuse Prevention Month in Roanoke County. D. BRIEFINGS E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Resolution supporting the Virginia Department of Transportation Six Year Primary Road Plan. (Arnold Covey, Director of Engineering & Inspections) 2. Request for approval of the 1996/97 RVTV budget for. (Anne Marie Green, Director of Community Relations) F. OLD BUSINESS G. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS H. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS I. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA 1. Ordinance to amend conditions on an existing Special Use Permit located at the intersection of Williamson Road and Summer View Drive, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Summeiview Creekside. 2. Ordinance to rezone 1.0 acre from I-2 to C-2 and obtain a Special Use Permit in order to construct a used car lot, located at the intersection of West Main Street and Country Farm Road, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Randy Vest. 3. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to expand William Byrd High School, located at 2902 Washington 2 Avenue, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of the Roanoke County School Board. 4. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to expand an existing equipment sales and service establishment located at 7549 Williamson Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Ace Sales, Inc. 5. Ordinance to rezone 88.53 acres from AG-3 to PCD, planned commercial development to allow commercial and recreational uses, located on the east side of the Blue Ridge Parkway at the north side of parkway bridge over the Roanoke River at Niagara Dam, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of the Industrial Development Authority (Al Hammond) J. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizing the acquisition of a permanent easement from David W. Shelor and Constance R. Shelor for access to the E-911 radio tower site on Fort Lewis Mountain and of a County water tank and the conveyance of surplus property containing 5.25 acres to David and Constance Shelor. (Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney) K. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance amending Article 1:V, Sewer Use Standards, Chapter 18, Sewer and Sewage Disposal of the Roanoke County Code. (Gary Robertson, Utility Director) L APPOINTMENTS 1. Blue Ridge Community Services 2. Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals 3. Highway and Transportation Safety Commission 3 4. Roanoke Valley Regional Stormwater Management Citizens Advisory Committee M. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Approval of Minutes -January 23, 1996, February 13, 1996, February 21, 1996, February 27, 1996, March 4, 1996. 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals, and the New Century Council Vision Implementation Committees. 3. Approval of a Bingo Permit for the Vinton Moose Lodge #1121. 4. Acceptance of water facilities serving Steak and Ale - 419. 5. Acceptance of water facilities serving The Village, Phase III. 6. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Oakcliff Tawnhomes. 7. Acceptance of sanitary sewer facilities serving April's Meadow Subdivision. 8. Approval of a Raffle Permit for the Glen Cave Elementary School PTA. 9. Approval of a Raffle Permit for North Cross School. 4 N. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS O. CITIZENS' COMII~NTS AND COMMUNICATIONS P. REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Statement of Estimated Revenues and Expenditures as of February 29, 1996. 5. Accounts Paid -February 1996 6. Additions to the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System in February 1996. 7. Update on legislation during the 1996 Session of the General Assembly. Q. WORK SESSION 1. Budget Work Session a. CIP Projects b. Utility CIP Projects c. Review of Budget Calendar d. Adoption of Rollover Policy R EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A S. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION 5 EVENING SESSION T. U. PROCIAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOG1vITIONS, AND AWARDS PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Public Hearing to elicit citizen comments on the following matters: (Brent Robertson, Budget Manager) a. Public Hearing to set a real estate tax rate of not more than $1.13 per $100 assessed valuation, and the "effective" real estate tax increase as a result of increased assessed value of real estate. b. Adoption of Order to set a real estate tax rate of not more than $1.13 per $100 assessed valuation. c. Public Hearing to set a personal property tax rate of not more than $3.50 per $100 assessed valuation and a machinery and tools tax rate of not more than $3.00 per $100 assessed valuation. d. Adoption of order to set a personal property tax rate of not more than $3.50 per $100 assessed valuation and a machinery and tools tax rate of not more than $3.00 per $100 assessed valuation. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance to rezone 315+ acres from R-1, AG-1, and AR to PRD, planned residential development to construct residential homes and commercial services, located on Cotton Hill Road, east and west of the Blue Ridge Parkway, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Boone, Boone & Loeb, Inc. (Janet Scheid, Planning & Zoning) 6 2. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to expand an existing manufactured home park, located at 5188 Yellow Mountain Road, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of Mountain Investors Corp. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 3. Ordinance to rezone 1.07 acres from C-2 to I-1 to construct offices and warehouse for pharmaceutical supplies at 7605 Robertson Lane, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of HCMF Corp. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 4. Ordinance vacating a 10 foot Public Utility Easement, located along the north property line of Lot 9, Section 1, Country Hills, recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 65, located in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District upon the petition of Paul A. and Cynthia W. Reburn. (Arnold Covey, Director of Engineering & Inspections) THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC FEARING HAS BEEN CONTINUED BY THE PLANNING COMII~IISSION 1. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to expand the existing church and school facilities, located on Williamson Road across from Brookside Shopping Center, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Shenandoah Baptist Church. W. CITIZEN COMII~NTS AND COMMUNICATIONS X. ADJOURNMENT J• AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 26, 1996 PROCLAMATION DECLARING THE MONTH OF APRIL, 1996 AS CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION MONTH WHEREAS, the incidence and prevalence of child abuse and neglect have reached alarming proportions in the United States, where 10,173 cases of child abuse and neglect were substantiated in Virginia during fiscal year 1994-95; and 65 cases were substantiated in Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, the Commonwealth of Virginia and Roanoke County face a continuing need to support innovative programs to prevent child abuse and assist parents and family members when child abuse occurs; and WHEREAS, in the Commonwealth of Virginia and Roanoke County, we have dedicated individuals and organizations who work daily to counter the problem of child abuse and neglect and to help parents obtain the assistance they need; and WHEREAS, all children deserve freedom from verbal abuse, sexual abuse, emotional and physical abuse and neglect; and WHEREAS, we believe all children deserve to have BLUE RIBBON DAYS, including loving hugs, warm homes, tender care, parents and adults who listen and promote self-esteem, give quality time, provide necessary food, shelter, clothing, and medical attention; and WHEREAS, it is indeed appropriate and fitting to focus attention upon the problem of child abuse and neglect in the Commonwealth of Virginia and Roanoke County. NOW, THEREFORE, WE, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke C-I ,, County, Virginia, do hereby proclaim the month of April, 1996, as CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION MONTH in Roanoke County, Virginia, and call upon our citizens to observe the month with appropriate programs, blue ribbons and other activities. C-1 ..._ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 26, 1996 RESOLUTION 032696-1 REQUESTING VDOT TO CONTINIIE FUNDING FOR PROJECTS CURRENTLY ON THE PLAN AND ADOPT THOSE PROJECTS IDENTIFIED AS 'PROJECTS NOT ON PLAN~~ FOR INCLUSION INTO THE 1996-2002 PRIMARY AND INTERSTATE SIIt YEAR IMPROVEMENT PLAN WHEREAS, the Six Year Improvement Program is the Commonwealth Transportation Board's plan for identifying funds anticipated to be available for highway and other forms of transportation construction for distribution in the 1996-2002 plan; and WHEREAS, this program is updated annually to assist in the allocation of federal and state funds for interstate, primary, and secondary roads. BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia as follows: 1. That the following projects identified as "Projects On Plan" continue to receive funding for construction; and Projects On Plan • Route I-81 - Roanoke County is very supportive of the Virginia Department of Transportation's proposed plan to increase the number of north and south travel lanes. Currently, there are two lanes in either direction. As a part of this plan, Roanoke County is requesting that consideration be given to improving all interchanges and investigate the possibility of constructing an additional interchange between Wildwood Road (Route 619) and the interchange at Dixie Caverns (Route 460). Increased urbanization, availability of utilities, and the potential for industrial development within the area justify the investigation of another interchange to serve this portion of Roanoke County. 1 ITEM NUMBER ~--i AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE• AGENDA ITEM:' March 26, 1996 Adoption of Resolution requesting VDOT to adopt recommended list of Primary and Interstate projects for the 1996-2002 Six Year Improvement Program. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS ~ , /%~ ~~~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY County staff is requesting the Board of Supervisors to adopt the attached resolution for presentation to the Transportation Board at the Virginia Department of Transportation Pre- allocation Hearing for Fiscal Year 1996-97, on April 2, 1996, at the Salem Civic Center. BACKGROUND On March 12, 1996, County staff conducted a work session with the Board of Supervisors to consider prioritizing the County projects identified in the current plan and those projects that the County is asking to be included in the Transportation Plan. After considerable discussion, the Board of Supervisors concluded that all County projects should receive a high priority. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt the attached resolution for presentation to the Transportation Board at the Virginia Department of Transportation Preallocation Hearing for FY 96/97 on April 12, 1996. 1 A-032696-2 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~'-~ ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 26, 1996 SUBJECT: Request for Approval of 1996-97 RVTV Budget COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~--~--~ ~-h-'L BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Roanoke County, the City of Roanoke and the Town of Vinton jointly operate Roanoke Valley Television (RVTV). The initial equipment and facilities for the television studio were funded through a capital grant from Cox Communications in the amount of $480,000. The studio is located at the Jefferson Center, and currently employs two full time staff members along with a variety of part time personnel. The staff produces videos and shows for the local governments and school systems which are cablecast along with government meetings on Cox Cable Channel 3. The County also operates a message board on Channel 3 in the Booth Communications System which serves the West County area. An interconnect between the two systems should be operational by the end of this calendar year. RVTV is governed by the Roanoke Valley Regional Cable Television Committee, which includes representatives from the City, the County and the Town. The operation budget for RVTV is provided by the three governments, based on the proportion of Cox customers located in each jurisdiction. The governing bodies have agreed to provide up to 20% of the franchise fee paid by Cox Communications to fund the operations of the facility. During the past year, RVTV has produced five department videos, two public service spots, 11 Monthly Shows, 24 Live Cablecasts and two Student Government Day Mock Meetings for Roanoke County. Based on local costs for production, the value of those productions is approximately $44,500. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Roanoke Valley Cable Television Committee has approved the attached budget for Fiscal Year 1996-97 for the operation of RVTV. `; i ~"' ~ , . --'~ PAGE .00101 ~° ----- ~~ -_--. - ___.___~__._.__.._ ..__._._. __ RUN DATE 01 / t b/96 - REPORT WBR990 - ~L \ I I-1 ~ ~' RVTV REVISED .BUDGET PROPOSAL 1 96-97 ~ ` ~; ~.- ~ I ~: '~ b I~ji ?.. -.___.._..__~_.--... _.. ~' I ~ _ FUND __ $1 Age ~ b Its SUBFUND 817 Cab ~~ ~s~ INDEX 2(3200 Re i ~ IiO TFfEfTT^- ~; ~" ORIGINAL SIX MONTHS BUDGET ~ ~ __._ __._..____-- __ ~ U~GE T ACTUAL REQUEST I ,, '' . ,I ~ ~ ~ S ^~ ~ ~~ ~ fi~ 9~= 9 6-l~sf~G- ~'T ,' , I -_ _..__ i rl `i~-i 1010 Regular 49,910 28,542 ~'d~ - ______1015 0vertime 86 ;~"i 1 0~0 ~ Part-Time -' ° - '.-..~tj p~j~,'°~, _~I 2100 FICA - Employer Con 3,818 2,552 -~ _ ` 2200 Retirement- VSRS 4,81:6 2,7b1 '<~ i I 2300 Group Health Insurd -'1, 5~~ ~;'T75 y =:3 2310 Group Dental Insure 280 164 !~a _____ 2400 Life Insurance - VS 88 ~ •100 ~_~ 3013 Professional SerVic ~;~p~'I ~~~ 3202 Repairs (Office Equ' 500 ~~ _ 3209 Repairs (Other Equi 1;pOR ~~GI 3 5 3 0 Printed Forms ~`(~"""-"-"-"'" `. ;.y 361 0 Advertising 1 , 500 ~'`'!_l~ ___`_521 0 Po_sta9e 150 ,.. 5230TTelephone -^__ ~~"'~-"~'-" '~=; 5305 Motor Vehicle Incur 1,500 1,575 '~s ~ ---- 53.08 --- General Liability I 1 , p5p 1,-100 ~' X410 LeasQlRent of Equip , , 3::j 5420 Lease/Rent of Build: 26,600 13,300 26.600 ~~~~ 5501 Ai Travel (Milea e) Farg,S00 518 1,000 5 5 2 0 9 ` Dinner M e e t i n s b L "~ - ¢~"'-, ~~3~ '-5U'Q"'-' -:! 5540 Training ~ Educatio 5p0 1,229. 600 ~~, ,~ 5801 Dues ~ Assocfation 5pQ 210 .500 ~4~~ 5813 Refunds d~ RebatQs !-~~ 5819 Small Equipment ~ S 500 ... ~~-~ 5883 Video Supplies 2, 000 1 , 08b ~~,! 5896 Employee Benefits -- "-~"-""" I''I 6010 Office Supplies-Gen 500 '''~ --- b 01 1 Phot ocop f es ~ 1 00 ~~~! ~G071 Radio P~ar~,$ "- ~,i 6080 !~e~ 6202_ aei _ 8201 i~cl 8 7 01 5504 ~,_I_-. i' 78,47*~ ~~- 0 I` J, VVV ' 8,81 I`~. 6,38b ~` ~~~4 - 453 ~'~; 0 ~; ~, ._.._...."T; 5U"0 =~ I 500 'J 1 , 000 „, 500 15 75 69S 800 Gas, 011 ~~Grease ~ 154 Subscriptions 40:0 Furniture b Office" '~'" Data Processing Equ; Conferences - ~ ~. `500. ~ ~- «400 , _ 1,000 ( ~,: ~. is3 TOTAL--------------------------- -------- - -154,19 ~~.~ ~ -I_ Last Years $u get : $'~2~3"; 0~"$ - I: ~L,i Increase is $31,092 (approx. 25% ~; crease) ~ r~ ~' I'~ 2,500 "` ~: , #4 a., 4u ,~ ' q'..' ~ '~~'~ ., ACTION N0. ITEM NO.~~"" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 26, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Requests for Public Hearing and First Reading for Rezoning Ordinances Consent Agenda COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: The first reading on these ordinances is accomplished by adoption of these ordinances in the manner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions, rather approval satisfies the procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public hearing and second reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public hearing on these ordinances is scheduled for April 23, 1996. The titles of these ordinances are as follows: 1) An ordinance to amend conditions on an existing Special Use Permit, located at the intersection of Williamson Road and Summer View Drive, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Summerview Creekside. 2) An ordinance to rezone 1.0 acre from I-2 to C-2 and obtain a Special Use Permit in order to construct a used car lot, located at the intersection of West Main Street and Country Farm Road, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Randy Vest. 3) An ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to expand William Byrd High School, located at 2902 Washington Avenue, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of the Roanoke County School Board. 4) An ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to expand an existing equipment sales and service establishment, located at 7549 Williamson Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Ace Sales Inc. 5) An ordinance to rezone 88.53 .acres from AG-3 to PCD, planned commercial development to allow commercial and recreational uses, located on the east side of the Blue Ridge Parkway at the north side of parkway bridge over Roanoke River at Niagara Dam, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of Industrial Development Authority (AI Hammond). MAPS ARE ATTACHED; MORE DETAILED INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE IN THE CLERK'S OFFICE. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: (1) That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of these rezoning ordinances for the purpose of scheduling the second reading and public hearing for A rp it 23. 1996. (2) That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth as Items 1 through 5, inclusive, and that the Clerk is authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action. Respectfully submitted, ~ -~~~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Harrison Johnson Minnix Nickens r Ar CtlUNtY tl~ aoANdK~ dept, b~ pLANN1NG ANb ZONING 373$ gr9rt1b11'tort AVB. 5W _ P.b. Eon 2sgoo - I~deneke, VA 2401 i3 1703) ~7~-2058 PAX (7031772-2030 for staff use only. ~~ ~'_ ,j date recelved~ '~ ~ ~% rece(ved by~~t~. application febjyf~ PC/!3ZA dateJ~/ / ~/ " / / placard! (!lued: ~ ~~/fir BOS date: y/ Ceaa Numbar: - .~, 1 l I I I I I I NI I • ~ ~~ 111 III I ! {IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII'~'I{'"E" ~~`'III~!~ III 1! 1 I I IIII 1 I , ! 1 1 I lR i I I l I II I II IIIIIIl1111U1111111llllliflll II llllllllll II l t ~ !- , ChEck type syf 2ppliC'~tidH filed (check all that 2pply): d C~EZONIN~ ~ SPECIAL USE C~vAftIANCE Applit:9nt'S t1aML: Jones ~ Jones Associates, Architect PC Phone: 366-3 35 Address: 6120 Peters Creek Road, Roanoke, Virgin' y 1 ~ ~/ f Zi : 24 ' Owner's h2i-t~e: Gene D. Lucas Phone: 563-9098 Address: p, 0. Box 6313, Roanoke, Virginia - Zip Code: 24017 Location bf property: t9x M2p Number: 28.05-1-9 Intersection of Williamson Road and M9glsterial District: Holli ns (Route 11) and Summer View Drive CdMmUhity Pl9nning Atea: Peters Creek Size d# parcel 151: Existing 2oning: c-2~ , 3.09 9ctes EXistln~ L9nd Use: tTt~dte~loped s~.ft. - 'li fl ! I 1 ~ I I i I tii f Ifl;1 If if! ifi ! {II p !I 1 f t i 1 jtt ! ! !I If l t - i .a ; !I I t..' :, i ! if t ' i ~ ~ ~ t~~ f j!~ f'!!!!!i'I!~!!'0''s'Iri':°~!:~'!°'i ~.~IIIIli3l,lllIIIIIIIIfIIIt~I~Illltit!iI!ffl:!it,iifti:i,,fi,ff: PrapbS2d t~i;in~: C-2-C - _ --- _-_ ptopb2ed Land Use: Office, Convenience Storey ~ftestaurant -.._.' 1:'orStaff Us• only u!a type: boES thA p"dtt:el th2et thA triiriirtium lot 2re2, width, 2nd frontage tequirem~E~ts of the requested district? YES x NO ~ IP No, A VAaIANCE IS gE(lUIREb PIaSt. boas the p2tt:~l FrtCbf the Frilnirrlurrt triterl2 for the requested Use Typal YES X NO IP No, A VARIANCP IS ~EtlUIgEb Plbst. If retonln~ tegUeSt, ire Cdnditlah9 being proffered with this requestl YES NO X ;!,:;•tl t .: t I i 'I .i ! !:~•i•!' 'it!::: •'tl i ti t ~ifi!fiil !tl ! I Eiitft'li +Ilif i ! I I ;;• iE..lt If I lilff!tl i'I II II ! f i ! ll I i (i I t IIiE{ il, ! ! t.t if!,i;,!slits`t~l! f: tt i li ({ .LI. I !i i,l; (t.,..,i{; !~ I( i l l - ~fi llili l l l~lll~ l l i l ~ ' } ~il i1 l 1,l~~ ~ t ~l f (! ~ !i! !! t f iiitti'f I!'ifij!i'f!f (i!!!i!f ii!!iii!ii!iii!i!~!~!iii!~!~!!!~!E!E I tttf • it i) (•I t •t.t;lit;,•: !ii!!~!!!E!i!`2''i°'"°°~~~!::i:i:y; :iaii ii!Ei:EiiE:f:ciEiE ilifi , t ,i,E: i i,f,! Ilf llll}if iil~illi f f . lf fE tl t fi l i i li .t . i fil!f l t li !. ' {f:i!ii:!ii1111,lg ii l 11 I . t ti i` ifi ! .:...: ., !t : t! : , , : t i t Variance of Sectioii(S) of the poanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: I~ the 2pplic2tiort t;otnplete? Ple2se check If Anclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS AIDE MISSING OF2 INCOMPLETE. ttr! v iv! v ~ v x Consult2tion g 1 /2" x 11 " t:onCept plan Application fee X Application X Metes 2nd bounds description Proffers, if applicable ' X Justific2tion X W2ter 2nd Sewei+ 9pplication X Adjoining property owners ~,- l hErEby cErtity that l ~r» Either fh2 dwnAr of thA pro/erty or the owner's spent or contract purchases and Err, pct/rf~ with the khhwlEd ~ d ~ onserit E bwrlEr. Signature: Richard L. Jor~, Jr., AIA Architect Jones ~ Jones Associates, Architects PC .• for SteH tlss Only; field Numbe- ~/' _ Applicaht Jones & Jones Associates,. Architects PC (Project: Summerview Creekside) 'lea~9 9Xpi9iri how th9 F9dUeSt ft)rthatS~ tha putpdS2S bf thA Zoning Ordinance ISectiori 30-3) 95 well as the ~urpoSA fouhd 9t the begirinirt~ tli'thA 2pplicabla toning district c12SSification In thA 2ohing ordinance. Summerview Creekside is a multi function development which includes office space, a Convenience Store; food Sales, and open .space in a harmonious environment. The praposed development. will maintain portions bf the site as open green areas while offering services needed by the surrounding community. This project specifically addresses. sections 30-3 (A)1, 30-3(A)2,~30-3(A)3, 30-3(A)6, 30-3(A)7 and 30-3(A)10 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. The purpose of this request is to modify condition number 1C placed on the special use permit granted by the Board of Supervisors, to a design which will create an environment which is more comparable with the surrounding community. Ple9se explain fides the (3Fo)gct oohfotn,s to the ~enArAl duideline3 9nd policies contained in the Roanoke County CoFnptehehSivA ~19tt. The subject property is designatec~._as transition land-use fn the Roanoke County Compresensive Developthent~Plan. The tfansition guideline§ encourages this type of development. Specifically this development adheres. to policy guidelines as follows: (A) TR-1 prevent haphazard sprawl;•TR-2 _encourage,retail uses in planned groupings; TR-3 use frontage for office~facilibies; TR-5 limit convetsion of detached housing unit into retail and office; TR-'1 coordinate:vehicular and pedestrian movement; TR-8 enhance the quality of highway frontage by limiting signs and landscaped yards; and TR-9 maintdining screening~arid buffering along property lines adjoining residential uses. Please deScribQ thA Imp9ctlS1 of thQ tequest on thA property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, 9s wail 9a thA imp9ct9 off public Services Arid facilities, including water/Sewer, roads, schools, parks/r2crA9tioH, 9nd firA/r9ScUA. ~ . The development will have a postive impact on the surrounding area. The services offered by St~liunerview Creekside arE~ directly connected to the needs of the surrounding community. The utility infrastructure is in place surrounding this site and is adequate~fbr this ~~roject. The conceptual site plan for this project indicates open greenway space along Tinker Creek. As part of this development the Owner intends to provide picnic table and seating for this green area. 7hd Planning CorrirriiSsiori will Study tAfoning 9nd Spaci9l USe permit requAStS >lo determine the heed and ~- Justific9tioit foF th9 ch9rib9 iri tArr}iS of public he2lth, Safety, grid general wAlfare. Please 9nswer the following que3tloriS 9S thoroughly 93 peSSibla. Use addition9l space if necessary. • %~'~i~ ~'°° f- _~ - 7~ 0 NORTH _ _ ; ~ ~ ~~ ~ %= M ~ / 3 w ~ ` 4 ' c ~ i " `, J199 ',S / ti 's 9 fzzJ ° °ov / 0 8 .d Qi) R, szis ~ 'y s • °' 48 ~ 7 ~. l ~ f>> M ~_ cn~• / / 9 ~~ oc ~ 1 ~' / `` ~~\ l i '' ~ ° ~°' ~ (~~I6I3 4 ~a 3 ~ iR~•?~~£ / ~~ 2.93 ~c G `i = ~. I •' o 1539 °f y r-'~, a .0 7 •e• 11 c `- •s, r•e v ' e~21 ~~ 12 ~~ '~ _ 6'7 8 : \ ` ' ~ ,~'`^ e~Z1 1325'. b `Y 4 w --°=~°._ a,. 9~~• ~•° ;_ ;, ~ en's :3.27' I 2 3\_~ `~o- m~ m. ebb ~ ~: ~~ ~ ' ear , C'2.8"~ x • - ma?• %R or.m~~~o .v .. ,~`~ = 8'Z~'• 11 ~ 's` , /1329 f~ pt~ ~.. ~ \ •* ~' JONES ~ JONES ASSOC. _ ~' * DEPARTMF~~IT OF PLP.I~III~'G SPECIAL USE PERMIT ~• AND ZONING 28.05-1-9 ~ .~ .,. a COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING .;~ For staff use 5204 Bernard Dr.~ _ P.O. Box 29800 _ Roanoke, VA 24018- ( 540' 772-2068 FAX (5401 772-2108 - .» date received: ++ received by: n fe • ~ ica i appl PC/BZA date: ~~ j~ ' ~ ~ ~ I placards issued: , BOS date: , r ~ _ j. ^ Case Number: /~,~ Check type of application filed (check all that apply}: Ce7 REZONING ©SPECIAL USE OVARIANCE Applicant's name: Randy Vest Phone: 387_0013 Zip Code: Address: 620 West 4th Street \~ Salem Vir inia ~% 24153 Owner's name: John & Ocie Mayhew ~' ``/j~J~Jy //p/}/ t ~ ~ /+ 'Phone: unknown / ~~" lam! i ~~ ~, r.+~ /~l . ~` t:~ .i j ` - ~ ~f ~-p Code: ' ~J~- Drive ' ~ ~~~ ---~r~~~1~ f~ ~ Address: mpb ~ ~ ~ , C ' ~~/ ~ 2 415 3 ~ ~' ' C../ , -- ' -~ ~ inia Salem V Location of property: Tax Map Number: 55.03-03-1:1 Corner of Route 11 and Country Magisterial District: Catawba R d F arm. oa Community Panning Area: Glenvar Industrial Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: I-2 1.0 acres Existing Land Use: Principal:_Industrial sq.ft. Proposed Zoning: C-2 ~ For staff use Only Proposed Land Use: Commercial Use Type: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES x NO IF N0, A VARIANCE 1S REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES x NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being prorered with this request? YES x NO Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v ws v ws v Consultation 8 1 /2" x 1 1 " concept plan Application fee Application <~?.: Metes and bounds description '..,: Proffers, if applicable Justification Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners /hereby certify that l am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent of he owner. Owner's Signature: % L- `"~~ --~~ ;. ~. ,. -r- ~~ APPLICATION FOR REZONING AND SPECIAL USE PERr1IT Randy Vest -- Randy=s Auto Works -_ ~- - Proposed Location: Corner of State Route 11 and Country Farm Road -- Roanoke County Tax clap Number 55.03-03-1.1 1. STATUS: Randy Vest is under a contrcact to purchase this parcel from John and Ocie Mayhew as shown on the attached Contract for Purchase. This contract is contigent upon approval of this parcel for use as a used car lot. 2. JUSTIFICATION: This parcel is currently zoned I-2 and is located within the Glenvar Industrial Area. The intended use is as a used car lot, which requires both rezoning and granting of a special use permit. This parcel is located amidst several other used car lots and is close to a major automobile scrap yard. Immediately across Route 11 is the State Police Barracks. There is a small residential section several hundred yards to the rear of the property down Country Farm Road. There is no industrial use in the immediate area nor, to the applicant's knowledge, is there any pending industrial development nearby. The intended development of this parcel as a used-car business entails a restricted commercial usage. This usage would vary somewhat from the language of the Comprehensive Plan and zoning patterns in the neighborhood, but would be directly consistent with the existng practices in this area and would not adversely affect either the Comprehensive Plan nor the underlying philosophy inherent in the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. It is clear that this development would further the commercial usage this strip of Route 11 now enjoys and would not have a negative impact on any property values in the area. The use of this parcel as a used car lot would, thus, not conflict with any potential uses while, at the same time, attract yet another business into the Roanoke County tax base. The physical layout of this parcel makes its use as a car lot ideal and its location outside any designated flood plain means that this usage will not pose any threat to the public safety of the citizens of this County. There would be no significant impact whatsoever on schools and parks, while the impact on roads, utilities, and fire and rescLe would be minimal. This parcel is far too small for any significant industrial use. And, given the proximity to the State Police Barracks, it is unlikely that any industrial uses would be undertaken for some distance in either direction along Route ll. Given its size and location, the parcel's principal usage is as a commercial property and the intended development thus dedicates this parcel to its best and most proper employment. Finally, the location of the parcel makes other commercial uses unlikely; it is too -.~~ v~ distant from significant population aggregations to attract a normal retail outlet, for instance, and the limitations on the parcel's size and road-access woulzl make its use as a warehouse - or like facility unlikely. _ - Therefore the rezoning and granting of a special use permit to allow this parcel to be used as a used car lot would further the logical development of land use in the Catawba Magisterial District without offending the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance. 3. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: BEGINNING at a point on the southerly side of U.S. Route No. 11, at the intersection of the southerly side of saide Route 11 and the eastern side of Virginia Secondary Route No. 858; thence along the southerly side of U.S. Route No. 11 N. 62° 30' E. 160.00 feet to an iron pin set; thence with a division line through the remaining property of L.D. Hill Company, Inc. (D.B. 1281, pg. 1471), S. 27° 30' E. 272.25 feet to an iron pin set; thence with another division line throught the aforesaid property of L.D. Hill Company, Inc., S. 62° 30' W. 160.00 feet to an iron pin set; thence with the eastern line of Virginia Secondary Route No.-858, N. 27° 30' W. 272.25 feet to an iron pin and place of BEGINNING, and containing 1.00 acre, as shown on plat dated May 22, 1990, prepared by C.E. Lacy, Jr., Certified Land Surveyor, which plat is of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court for Roanoke County, Virginia, at Deed Book 1324, page 419. 4. ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: TAX MAP NR 55.13-1-1: Virginia State Police RFD 1 Salem Virginia 24153 TAX MAP NR 55.13-01-02.01 i~IcVitty Homes of Roanoke Valley Ir,c Richfield Retirement Communtiy Post Office Box 3240 Salem Virginia 24153 TAX MAP NR 55.03-03-01.01 ~so3-3- fs TAX MAP NR 55.03-03-14 Cheasapeake & Potomac Telephone Co Bell Atlantic Post Office Box 12020 Roanoke Virginia24022 Thomas J and Nancy S Tolbert Post Office Box 1614 Salem Virginia 24153 ,,~~"'' TAX MAP NR 55.03-03-01 L D Hill Co., Inc. ~.p, gc~ Sy D _ Leonard D Hill - - - - - 3980 West Nlain Street S~ ~~~~ ~ ~- z'~'S3 -_ Salem Virginia 24153 5. UTILITY CONNECTIONS: a) Application for Water Hook-Up has been made and is pending. A copy of the letter from the Roanoke County Utility Department is attached. b) A septic system will Concept Plan. This parcel was 1990, as shown by the attached Roanoke County - Vinton Health owner, John Mayhew. Dave Robi physically visited the site in the intended installation of a updated application. be installed as shown on the approved for a septic system in application and letter from the Department to the current property nson from that agency has January, 1996, and has approved septic system upon receipt of an c) The nearest fire hydrant is at the far corner of U S Route 11 and Country Farm Road. 5. FLOODING CONSIDERATIONS: A Storm Water Management Area will be located as shown on the Concept Plan. _ 6. CONDITIONS: No conditions are being proferred at this time ~~ but any suggestions from the County's officials will be cheerfully considered. DATE: 23rd February 1996. y ~`~ RANDY VEST • ,\~ t~ rZ ~~ ~ fN ~ ~b .r _____ ~b~ `` i L` 6p 1 r _ ~ _ /~ r ~ 1 ~ / ° ~ ~ ~ `~ ` • - ~1 I l ~{ f y tI ~ I \ e ~ ~ \`~ t / ~ z ~~ `. o ~ ~ ~ , ~s ~ ~~ :'~ ~ • pvaczo s --- / `~ ~ \ ~~ f ~ ~ ~' ~ °~ 3~ \ ~ ~ ! h ~ ~ _ 1 ~ / \ /~ ~ i ~/ ~ ~~r A, ,1 lf' I "„,I'' 0 ~ •ai• Yl`y} `i / ffffff ~y,- ~j ~I~ J3 N ' ~ <''• W Z f2+~~ ' I ' I I / UNW ~ ~~: ' aNm••:.I ~:.~ ; '~ ~ _: __.~.1 __ _~ .µ __ , __ ~ 3 .7UACZ9 J~. .ay' __ __ __ __ 11- w __ _- __ . _ . _ .. _~____~____ _-__ws~__- _n _-_~ ~ n -_- n ^N F~ 04Y 7 tt 31(10M 5'A ~~!! ! ?~~11S Nib'W 1S~M - --~ _~-- 1 ` ,--~~. ~ ~~ ~~ ••~ ~~ ~ / ~~! ~~ ') M ~ I Q~ i ~ ¢ `i W~~ j N I ~Z . ~ '. ~ Y .~~ ~ o _ ~~ ; O N ~ ~ ~ ' .Wad `~ L : 1 ~~~)~ 0 ~ N ° oZ 1 ~i ~ NNN ' ~: ~ ~~ a~ls= ~ Q ~ ~ ~Z~ W ~~i~a ; ~- O ~ Q yyyy yyy , ~ ~~ I~~ Q ~t ~ ~ ~3~~ie, I n . s'~s ~ _ H • ~' ~ W ~~~~ Z 3 N - n ~ ~ r ep~ri ! ~ _ ~~~~1 Z G ~ N A 3 m D II A •n ~.. ~a _ s ~ - _ ~ ~/ ' ~ `8r~ GLHkvaR r P~•Y,--o-_ ~R~ yp~° ~~~ES°p~,~a °a AIN St 91 ti ~ G VAR ~ PpR ~ Lt9 ~ELCO M ~~ \(~,~ ELF~1 O.U b SHa1.lRC gRiryyF1ib' d W ORT '~ Jd• R P~ 0 LEWI AR M,yRE.4F ~' 6}5~'}SIN~USTRIAL GR rt,'l RES UE SO < (Q - ~ PARX cQUj /`j7 `~0 9~8F E5T -~ LK 9 9 p2+ pR 0 ` 9a ~ ~ 9~~ °G~<~ ~G~,arA N f 4~ ~6 FMS ~ Pcs .1 c i ~ 09 ~'~ 9;" 'rtR OJT - - SaL_u L ~ 4,4<o ira7c~FrLlrZa1G 0 i,' Ka01,,GiP?~ S ~~v~OR CiRq P4iNr ~.~ 9,~r` CO c0~ ~~PE?s rod. ~GR~ Rini ? c^ ~ 9~ ~--~~-\~/~'}/ uSN r7 .~'s ~ -~ - ~ ~ ~~" ..mac/l _ -VICINITY MAP ~ %.2, NORTH ~ ~ ~ ~I ~~ . P10 ».09.1-19 ~ t~ I'•IW' it ~~~f ~ ~ ,cut ~•"'~ ~,... :.s: k yr ~, {~ r c. /~ ~ ~? ~ ~- ~ ~ ~ ~. J v T 2 c..,.._..n..r n.~.+ Y.T.. s,.,. ~ 4 ~ ~~~k / ~ . ~ ~ .S ~ ~ j t 6 ~ ~ 4.Ob Ac ~ it ~ n L..,. / L I1~7K~L.1 ~.7~ Ac r O ~ ~ y IJ • .~~'~. . ~ •371 z .~ `'' L "~_ t 7 ~ '• s• l 3901 . + 16 31S'~ ~ ,. ~ 391 6 ~~ ~~ .~ '' '' ~ t 8 ~ /a JY ~ ,jt6 ~ l ., ~~ 3 ~ ~ I.00 A c .~/~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~.~ _ 20 3.25 Ac ~ - ~~ ~- 21 1.48Ac . ,*• 17 8 •2.29Ac ~.~ \~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~33..c ~I i - ~ .. ~ \ ~. ~ ~ \~ . ;. T DEPARZi~SENT OF PLANDII\G RANDY VEST I -2 TO C-2 Plv~ zorrrn•G 55.03-03- ~ . i :~ .,, i - • aly~~s~ ;i .For st~ff use onl~ COUNTY OF ROANOKE ~~ DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 5204 Bernard Dr.~_ _ P.O. Box 29800 ~ - Roanoke, VA 2401.8 ( 540' 772-2068 FAX (5401 772-2108 ~} dot re eived: '~Gr_' rec ived by: ,~ r3 9(v application fee: PC/ ZA_dat~: a~~i~ ~, /496 placards iss ed: ~ zsy 5 data: l L ~ ~ ~ ~99L ~ c,r~ i ; Case Number: i Check type of application filed (check all that apply}: D REZONING ®SPECIAL USE OVARIANCE Applicant's name: Roanoke County School Board. Phone: 562-3700 Address: 5937 Cove Road, N.jV . , Roanoke, VA /a j~ dip ode• 24019 Owner's name: Roanoke County School Board Phone: 562-3700 Address: 5937 Cove Road, N.jY, , Roanoke, VA Zip Code: 24019 Location of property: Tax Map Number: 61.11-1-11 tiVilliam Byrd High School 2902 jV hi A Magisterial District: Vinton as ngton venue Vinton, VA 24179 Community Planning Area: o ~~~~%~rJ Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: C-1 41.6 acres Existing Land Use: Educational sq.ft. :#:: Proposed Zoning: No Change - "Special Use Permit" Only For Staff use Only Proposed Land Use: No Change - Educational Use Type: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES X NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria fcr t`~e requested Use Type? YES X NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being pro. ~ era with this request? YES NO N /A :::#:::::s ~::::~;: Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: NOT APPLICABLE Is the application complete? Please check if enclcsed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF Ai`JY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMFLE i E. ws v X Consultation X Application X Justification ws v ws v X 8 1 /2" x i 1" concept plan X Application fee X s~ Metes and bounds description i1/ ..:;: Proffers, if applicable ~~,~~ X :>~ . Water and sewer application Adjolning property owners /hereby certify that / am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the know/edg~and consent_of the owner. Owner's Signature: Homer D . Duff - ~ _ Director of Operations & Facilities . _ \• ' . ' - -~ Fo/Staff Use On/y: Case Number ~~ - Applicant Roanoke County School Board The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section~30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. '1'he.proposed.building expansion at William Byrd High School furthers the. purposes of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinances (specifically sections 30-3~ ~(A) 3:.& 303 (A) 4) by facilitating the creation of a "convenient, attractive] and harmonious community," and "adequate schools, recreational facilities i and other requirements." Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. 'ne current comprehensive plan designation for this site is "Neighborhood onservation". The proposed William Byrd High School expansion is one of he land uses designated as "desirable" in the neighborhood conservation esignation. Specifically this development conforms to land use guides C-1 and NC-6. ,Please describe the impact(s) of the request on t`.e Property itself, the adjoining properies, and the surrcur,ding ,area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, ', parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. ~. he proposed addition at William Byrd High School will.have minimal, if any, ffect on adjoining properties. The existing building is located on_ a 41.6 cre tract and has a "footprint" of approximately~81,000 s.f. The proposed ddition will add approximately 16,000 s.f, to this "footprint" and will aintain a distance in excess of 250 feed to the nearest property line. ublic utilities are currently available on the site and the proposed expan- sion will connect to existing lines, which are capable of supporting this roposed addition, Traffic impact will be minimal since this building ddition is essentially for expansion of current programs rather than anti- ipated increased enrollment. 1 __.__. ~~e - ~9 ,~s ~o ~ J ~ ~ Z ~ ~ o ° jsf / J U ~ d -~~~ ~ h~ • Z ~ O ~ ~.a .~a j S~c~~ ~ = -~ H ~ ~- 3` ; - ~~`sfi s o J C~ ` ~4. _ _ ~ag ~$~d y A~~~X - < -. ~ = c dz H W: ~r~ ••- _ -"- n _ ................. K ........,..-----............................ ................. ............~ .........3 ............. ........................... ri <........ ..-.,.------ W~ .r ~ F _ i ~~ .....................°---........... ~j-- W ,. ............F .......................F. ~° ________~ ___ ~R____--__ - -R~ --- ..... •- ' K -•---•-•---°•- . a -e~:. "= ....... ° .. Ne^ • f~i -a'-d f°. ,.` ~e 3r:x _ ,_ a~_ ...............Bsag..... 3: : - ~~ 4: c t~ -. ~_ 1 .. _--- _. ........... w •...:. R .... i 3--. .. -.~--. _ a o s ~ ................ ................. ...... .................. ..............._e = d g ~ ^.......... ... ' ....... ...... .... ~ Q g ^ °~ __ ---------- a .. a - a- 3 ~ ~--°... ._.s_K~ : . ........................ .... ~-~_ ..-C ~........ ---s;ag .. ................. .... ... - ~ : - ~ -- .~ i ~ ... ..,. ...... a.9 _.. -........y....... 4 ..R~ ......... x . .. K ~~~= .....-----~ ...:~ s -.. x s .s ~ ~ e~ x 8~ e3 o^ `o YY~S ~.o=~ ~; ~__ W mu~W ~Q 6 S~~ a e x ~:d O .µ' i o -. _ ~ 's b ~' Y # ° ~ ~ ~ ~ = ~'- ., ~`. ~~~R3 - ~ ~ g~R~~ .. t _ ~~R .. (.teats ur) -- --- a - -~--- ~'i ao•rs - xtt aar _ ...... ......- -•--- • g ~ ~~~ t_~ ~~>yy e~aG ~ ~ z O .-. }- O ~' ~- m2m`°~ U x u ~ ~ ~ N m ~ Q } ~ ~ to _JC~Nz~. ~ ~ 0 J N z z ~ 0 0 ~ ~1{ a m = of • ~ e ~- U d ~ = 1 V ~ o ~ ' v , O ~ Q U ~-: Q ~_.< o c a a ~ ,. y ~ l 'j #4 ~J yy i B~i ~..~ aeX: , ii b a b° ~~ ~Y~o 263:. c e (:_. a« g~~s~ ~~ =c:~;= g5:ia 5:.: 4".. Yb:iai --~ ~--^ ~ ~Sii3. a ti I• •I ..a ~ I _ •_ ~ . 6~ ~~; ~ 3 r~~ ~ ~=i - - 76cy :~ ~'a sgsa~ ~~a! c I~~~~ ~ $sni~. fie.:as Yi'. a~%i =1.~1 . _1 ``; ; _.. e 1 i I y ~8- ~ ti Q ~ `~ .s •_ _4 ~ Y Z ~ o J Q Y ~_ m \.P" c R ' ~ ~ °3 1100 t ~ ~. ~OO~N h,. ~ T ~~ . • s 7u~+ dio p~ ~R C~ -~:a p r p ~ Y: '~cn 1'.. ~ SP ING GR v G` \' 'n,r .:~. ~ - - ifL~~~1 . ' '~~`'` ~ AvEN'....•..::,, d-~oN spa ~ I „~ >. l NAV.`~', ` : ..~°w~~cp ~, t 4`~ , ~ X70 0 ~' G` ~ spY IyC" c Y r..~ ~ R -~~' H ~~~'j y~~p NORT ^~~+~ n. ~r ~+lr _ ~ ~ r' p. e` .~1• . ~~ ~~~ KI ~•ll Y= s ~ tl r M ~ '' 4 r r ~n ~ ~~r ,~ ~t a~ q ~ _ l ;,~ n p~. ~ ~ • i~ ao `• - 3 = _ my ~ ~ . s.r / . G4 _ MME , r 4 °' ~ ~ ~s ~ J .~ f~/'~ 2~ /1 60 %~ ~ •, •' X49 Gc~ .\ L P~' ~~ ~' * DEPARTi'~~I'I` OF PZI~NNING WM• B~1~D HIGH SCHOOL SPECIAL USE PERM Z ~ AND ZONING 61.11-1-1 . .~ . ~. ~. r,..~ f • xoc :~• \ O b ~ \ "' a COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING -AND ZONING 5204 Bernard tOr.._ P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 - ( 540' 772-2068 F:-.X (540) 772=2108 ac o,< Z/u yb c ~_ i / ~~jr a jc 2 f Zt,! `iL Fnr staff use only date received-' z~ ;/y~ received by:~~~ application fee: PC/6Z.a date:, placards issue ~~ BOS date/` 3/j~ Case Number: ~ J7` / Check type of application filed (check all that apply): D REZONING ®SPECIAL USE OVARIANCE Applicant's name: Ace Sales Inc. Phone: 563-5055 Address: 7549 Williamson Road / PO EOx 7067 Zip Code: 25019-706 VA 24019-7067 Owner's name: paul G. Black Phone: 563-5055 Address: c/o ACE Sales,. Inc. (See above address) Zip Code: 25019-706 Location of propery: Tax Map Number: 27.11-3-9 7549 Williamson Rcad ,tilagisterial District: lin Community Planning Area: peters Creek . Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: C2 2.309 acres Existing Land Use: Ecui pment Sales and Service 100,580 sq.ft. :a: :: ~~: Proposed Zoning: C2 For staff Use Cn1y Proposed Land Use: s ion Of '. .. Equipment sales and ervice - expans' Use Type: existing use Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, v~idth, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES x NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria fcr t`a requested Use Type? YES x NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being prc ~ ~ =red v~~ith this request? YES NO Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in cyder to: Is the application complete? Flease check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT EE ACCEPTED IF r,NY OF THESE ITEMS ARE ~AISSING OR INCOMPLETc. ws v tvs v - ws v Consultation 8 1 /2".x i i " concept plan Application fee / Application ^Sa Metes and bounds description /`:<-:: Proffers, if applicable Justification '"`~ ... .. ~ ti.Qn. Adjoining propery ewnets !hereby certify that l am either the or~ner of •~e property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and cans t the owner. Owner`s Signature: - _ -•• - - ~~~ - poi SIaK Use Only: Case Number - .: .:.:.:::.:.:.:::.:::::::::.:.:::iii=EEE?:;iEiiEEcE:cii:;i;i`EEic iE;c;:e:;;cE;;c:pip:;~::iE :::E '~:iciii:iiii:?iE:::;::`::`:::c:iiiE:ip2;:2?:ii'iii::ii 'i:::p,5:p:::i:i:i:: .. f~2 & .Applicant Ace Sales, Inc. - - The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please .answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning districrclassification in the zoning ordinance. The proposed expansion provides for convenience of access and poses no threat .from fire, flood.ard ct^er dangers. The request, if granted, will: not increase congestion on public streets. No historic buildings or areas are affected. The project will enlarge the Count tax base,. and~~employ additional people. The request would allow the expansion of an existing use which is allowed under the C2 zone (Section 30-54) by special use pernit. The site is located along a major.~arterial thoroughfare. The proposed expansion, as illustrated on the concept plan, conforms to all of the requirements of the C2 zone. Section 30-85-14 specifies:: additional design .. standards,:whi:ch:ensure compatibility with adjoiriing land uses. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive plan designates this area as Transition. The site fronts on a major collector~streetin an area where a strip pattern of development is occurring. The~site is currently zoned co~unercial and is oriented towards Williamson Road. The request is for expansion of an existing use which has been in place for over twenty years. The use is allowed under the current zoning ordinance. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on t~~e property itself, the adjoining properies, and the surrcur,ding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. Should the request be granted, anew building (4992 SF) will be. erected on the site. A .new outdoor sales display ;area. will be constructed.- Impacts.rn:puLlic utilities will be minimal ~rrntir~l. increase) . Traffic on Williamson Road may i__^.cr~a~e minimally. - Other ... public services will not be affected. Neighboring properties will not experience signific~:at impact as the existing buildings shield the new building-from view. As a separate project, the Owner is providing landscaping along Williamson Road. .,`~ _ ~ - _ _ r to \ , ~ ~.- \ - ~ a O - - _ ~~ ' ` ~ `e' N - ~ 4 ``p eat ° n i ' / { \ CO ~ N ` 'c X10 ~1 Y `e; / e r C~ `C ee / °r/ (.OJ .`..`_-JJ ~ L7 • ~ ~ ' L E'. i O i - ~ .o~ . - m' \ \ ee ~ .'O ~ r' c - - ~ .y - ,_o ~ e~ + ~ \s r ~ ^,e ,o ~ ~ . o~ M • ~i V' ` ' , r e` ` Y .ee ~• N ~ ~ sT. 'S ~j ~r o , e .~ ~ g4 \ n v ~ e~ N \ Ii qr $ ~• ~ ti ~ • 'may ~ •~.1 \ '~ ^ .. ,.t ~B ~~ ~ ~ s v f•,' \ .L.2 ~~~, 6a < b \ i~ $ M • O \ u ~ ~~ o to ~,ti r ~, N' 1 ~ ~ _ ^O ~ i3 ~ ~\O\ ~e~ _~ N . ~ o t L \~+~ ~ c r ` ~ / ~. ~v / ~ e C_. ~~ o \~ je oP y) \ / i1e" ~\`+ ~a° \ ~ \ o/ ;z Qo N ` c ..` _ R 3 ~; ~ _. ~= •T O\~O~ Q~~~\` l~ •• ~= s~''v ~f' M . = - .~4 r ~~ F D O J i ~ J O c o ~ v u ~ JC V' i = O ~ C D W` a c ? C ~ 1 ~ ~ a D WI P~CI; ~ C aj n1n N. '~ N r I J1 !D~ w•1 <. u aiNl ~' 0 ~ ~~ \ Ft' W~oi c~a ot~~, !H ~n a O z I_ _ 'r Q O ~`~ y ~ VAN c~ (r+16 F ?~oi: ~ < nlnl% D NI N~ I~~ W ^~~Ia U~ K~.,I div6"• °~H~-I. i 'i 4 ~~- I~' o i `~'=~ \ d Wlmio~c 1 =._ = p~. O r O o• \ ~ g '4i~1 w > C LU V: bv.4 0~' N s:- C: re i~~ ' C \ we G N, M . 9 > ~ c _ \ pc" ~.~ tie / u Z ~~ Q i ~ u \ - ~' t. O ~pK O ~+ ° y / -_ C `/ / C ~ G • ~y; 2 3 L ~ . _ . - - J--~ .,~ :. _ . - = o - C ~ ~ ~ 1r ~ , A r ``t~ ~ J V yl ..~~ , _,, ~ s. L 11 +,, d _, ~_=~~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e ~ r ~. o tl ___.- 1~ r ;y \1.~ =' ~ 0 G p d ~~~ --A 1---- ~- :: s-- '~ ~ ; ~ ... ~ ~,~ :.~ _ ~ ,: ~~ •. C ,~ d r ~ -. ~ ~ ~.~:..:' _ _ _ o ~. 8 .., ~ ~ a (~ ~ ~ ` Md t~ ~~ .- -~ ~ ~ a _... ,~' ~~ -~~ ~ . ~ ,,- .'a ~ . z ~= .~=. I~ ~ ~!;~ 111 (~ ~ ~ 'G .:. ~i -~_ ~; 0 a~ a~ .il b _ ;;~ _~ U a Q ~~ ~ rz ~ ~ w ~ i L L ~ .- ~L Q F- ~ Z '7 o r.. Q~, I CU f; c~ I J W W ~ f- Q -~ a f--~ U C~ v ~~ H L <L ~ ~ L.~ L_e__ O ~-~ W a~ ~L ~-~ ~^_ J n, . -=L o C1) [~ ~ ~ '--~ 1- ~ .o f/1 ~ ~.. ... . ~l (~ ~ ~ f=i R_ o° Z D u; C7 ~-+ l~ C~ Q 'L W l'U J U _ n~ -. N J O ', v. III ii; O ~~ Y ~U ,:, - _ o- - - ,~ _ ~; ~; •_ f-~ %'•.:~ ill Ll .`~ ~~ J -~ ~_-> ..] W ~~.~ `r l: ~ N V••= ~J ~~~ lSll cu o` -~ µ ~~ cz ~c, ~ / ~, w ~ ~-- -- _~ ~ ~ , ~ <= L ~~ yy 0 0 i t~ Q1 t'l~ ~-' 0 CU J C~ I.L1 t- t7 4 -~ r~ - 1~ 7 J i-1 ~ T ~~ F~ L ~2 ~ ~.- z l~ OW ~~ s ~ ~J ~l l~ .t `'O __ ~ a~ Wy 7I~CV~y, O. ~ H ( I~ 1 - l _ ~ . w Z n ~ ~ ~ .--. ~ ~~ ~ p W 1L i~1X ~~ ~~ 2 C'1 L ~ r- L~ [a V.. „~ „J ,z (f1 x N ~ r,~ lJ [a `_ ~•,> F- ~~ ~ LL w ~_ _~ ~.__ WJW~ L' IFJ J O 4' W 47 W A7 ,~ H J ~~ ~; [L~ n. . " T Ll~ n Q,z r~3 W l~ ~ ill •s u~ ~ ~- c~ o ~~ ~r o 0 r- > L J •H ul' {~ ~ •t Z ~ lf7 ~ti Q ~'' w r~ o~ r~ <_ ~ T~ ~. o ts2e 3 t5: tS ~6 •P ~~~ e (U a `,oho tsg9 e 14 o e: t~l o a fOS ~` ~ 10 ~ e~ \IS e~ ~ 9 b d O~ ~~, ~,y l e, I ~ ~ m 1 ~ / ~ 33 /,a ~~ 32 ~ ~'~ s 3I ~ ~t2s /~ ~ \ y S 23.1 ~. 241 r ~ ~ \' ~ 2.80AC l ~ ~ 123 Ae 24 ~ ~ ~ y0 •i> 7ui t~f I V ~t' \\ •~ tt 1 • 1 ~00. tt~t 13 tss II ~ a+ 23 Gi V `d'am \\\O((~5~~ trot ~~' 1.3d%r / ~N 1 ~ ` a a \ (I = J .e' e _ ;, 13 m ~ ~~t \ 13 9 L76Ac p ~ t \ t`IS ~ V ISrAc ~ ~ 75~ ~ ~ - ~ N C~ ,s2~ \ 2•a~A~ 1 ~ ' t ~~ ~~~ ~ sa' ~ I i °o \ __; ~ e y .,~ / ,~ a` to \ /,,~ e $ 1.37AC ~' ~ O ~/ra/ "' ~. ,, tt ,, VV \ ~ ' /~ . u tSSS t~9 0 > ~ C~ f/ \ ~•~i, 1• ti 7.1 ~°, ~ 13 • ~y ~ ASS 4 ~ ~ 5 ~ ^ ~~ ii '/ `~ tyll ,. :. Gi N 2. 6c ~ p \l2 { tw Ot S sa .e ~ lli ' o ~' $NN e' ~4~ II `° ~ a ~ 10 ~ X12 ~ ` %• ~ ~ 622 ~~ 7~f ~ _ ~ LOIAC / ;:~ z '~ ~ d ~ ~\ ~ O r, 6 '`~ et er ~ ~~ esc .p/ .%>> ~ .s ; t ' O~*~ r• r,e \ X07 ~ c ~ z ~ 1~0 7 ' ~ ~ t ?. oar °' ~ 4 ~ tie 7 ys, ~` , I o ti, 3 1~ v ty! ~ t~~ s ~ ~0 28 ~ .s+ s}! iar~r >~; t0~ '` OA~ 4 o per ~ • t~22 ° ~ Y- 2 / ~ ~ Dexter Road '*~, ~ ~ ~ # P~ ~~ ~' ~ 1 ~ ~• 4 ~, 2 t .o fir ° • ~T i •s II'~$ 10 0 r , '~~ N ~ 9 o . \ \ ~ tySt `e`~. S e• 12 b: 12~ roo:e \ "~ 1 ~~, o~ ts31 ~~ ~°'I~ t ~~ cc~~deo~ ave ~ 1 14 r 4, ~ - 5v D~Ay~ OF PLAs'VNZA'G ACE SALES INC. SPECIAL USE PERMIT p~ 2ot`rz.~v~G 2 7.1 ~ - 3 -~9 COUNTY OF ROgNOKE DEPT . OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 6ramb(etcn Ave. S :'! P.O. box 2°S00 - Roanoke, VA Z40"f 8 (703) 772-2068 F.^-,X (703) 772-2030 y,.,q~ c,_ 2+i3. 2~~rfJv C~f `/ZF/~6 (' FCC Sicii USe Grly ../mss tea:' -i ~ / /7 ..etvea ., r..~V z~;.ii a;ion fee: IrC,•'EZ:. da;a: i v /~ r)'.`: placards issued: ~' 1305 da;a: Case ,:umber. /~~ ~ f/~~ ;~?~`'`p"~'~'`E~ ~`'~`~'`J`~.``•`~SEE2EE;f€=i'i'~;':c`::~`'~~5;`:E?i~;;~;EEEE ~sE~~'~? Check type of application filed (check all that app)y}: C REZONING ^ SPECIAL USE ^VARIANCE Applicant's name: Industrial Development ~uthoiity of Roaro'.{e County Phone: (~0~) ~ ~~" 119 i Address: P.O. BoY 20068, 1919 Electric Rd. , Roanoke, V3 Zip Code: 2018 Owner's name: Phone: Address: See attached sheets G~ Zip Code: Location of property: Tax N1ap Number: See attached sheets ~ f ~~---' hed sheets S tt Magisterial District: See attache sheet ee a ac Community Planning Area: :~ Size of rcQ,Js): ~~ Existing Zoning: --~~ See attached sheets (See , ~ acres Existing Land Use: See attached she ets attachmen ft . _ 'a:. _~~ii°-: ::: :Y~ .ts::. `'i'~. ~~. r:~ .. ..: .. ... . -~~ ~ ~~R Proposed Zoning: See attached sheets (~y~ .........................:... Fa~Staff Use o~iy Proposed Land Use:. See attached sheets use Type: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum c: iteria fcr th. r~quest:d Use Type? YES NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being pro~~arec' with t;~is request? YES NO Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in crier to: is the application complete? Please check if enclcsed. APPLICATION LVILL NOT BE ACCE?TED 1= ANY OF THESE ITE,ti1S ARE MISSING OR 1NCOMFLET E. NS V -r NS V R'S V _ . Consultation / ~ 8 1 /2" x 1 1 ' concept plan Application fee Application ^= 1~letes and bcunds description ; Proffers, if applicable Justification ~`~`• V`later and se•.ver application Adjoining property owners - /hereby certify that / am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the know/edged co-ns~ent of tt•e ov~ne~. Owner's Signature: .^~G~LL!z~ ~ ~~ , Edward A. Nacc, COl.:7Se , rlQUS~rla1 Lt'V~'lU ~i1C• ~ ~+u~<< ~~-~. _ _ of Roanoke County, Virginia ' ,, .' - - '~ SITE EVALUATION CRITERIA SITE NAME - TAX l~1AP # - MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT - Al Hammond 71.00-1-1 Vinton SITE LOCATION East side of Blue Ridge Parkway at north side of Parkway bridge over Roanoke River at Niagara Dam SITE SIZE - 88.53 acres EXISTING LAND USE Vacant-agricultural use EXISTING ZONII~'G AG3 PROPOSED ZONING ~ ~~ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION Rural Preserve WATER SERVICE Off site at Feather Road, extension feasible SEWER SERVICE Off site at Montgomery Village ROAD ACCESS Entrance approval needed from National Park Service (NPS); existing Hammond Drive serves property. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY COMMENTS Not covered ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT RATIONALE FOR REZONING Identified as prime site by NPSfrom Blue Ridge Parkway Visitors Center. Property owner has concept plan that shows development of orientation interpretation center, restaurant, conference and lodging facilities on site. PLANNING COMIVIITTEE/IDA SUBCOMitiIITTEE COIVIivIENTS - ~ - ' ~ - RECOMMENDATION ____ Fes' ,~. - _ ~'t 100 ,. ~4 9F IFG~MIA. Nay ~ f ~5 au°NOFI, , NIAGARGI PLORc" ...tSS+"tSR "MVNTCn,MEnY ^""' q IfPC •~ ; :1 c, 1~ ~~ ~ a cP~ ~~ ~ hpR rfI60 •FOX 9t ~-.~• - FIRE cio i'"\ ~•~ ,._ , E~LORE I ~ - FARK ~ 1 ),~~ I ~ locc ~' ~~~ .~ ~' 1! /I -.~ _. ~~ ` J E' ~;S ~ .:. ~. ~0~: " Cn '-. Site name: Blue Ridge Parkway ~~~ Al Hammond property - ~_ Cax Map Numbers: Request: 11.00-1-1 Rezone AG-3 to A-V 88.53 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER `~*/ AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVI80R8 OF ROANORE COIINTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANORR COIINTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 26, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF A PERMANENT EASEMENT FROM DAVID W. SHELOR AND CONSTANCE R. SHELOR FOR ACCESS TO THE E-911 RADIO TOWER SITE ON FORT LEWIS MOUNTAIN AND OF THE SITE OF A COUNTY WATER TANK AND THE CONVEYANCE OF SURPLUS PROPERTY CONTAINING 5.25 ACRES TO DAVID AND CONSTANCE SHELOR COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: In 1990, David and Constance Shelor and the County entered into an agreement which provided for access to the top of Fort Lewis Mountain over a large parcel of the Shelor's property. This was necessary to permit the County's contractor, Motorola, access to a radio tower on the mountain as part of the upgrade of the E- 911 radio system. As its share of consideration for use of this easement the County intended to convey to the Shelors a tract of land containing 5.25 acres adjoining the Shelor's mountain land which was originally purchased by the County's Public Service Authority. Additionally, the Shelors were to convey to the County a small parcel on which a County water tank is located. A title defect to the 5.25 acre parcel caused by a competing branch of deeds involving this same tract prevented the County from conveying a clear title to the Shelors up to this time. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Following extensive negotiations between the County Attorney's Office and the Shelor's attorney, agreement has been reached for a permanent easement to the County's radio tower on Fort Lewis Mountain. The County will pay the Shelors the sum of $10,000 in two annual installments for a perpetual non-exclusive easement across their property in the same location as the present roadway ~- for access to its E-911 radio tower. The County will undertake legal efforts to remove the cloud upon the title to the 5.25 acre parcel at its own expense and convey that property to the Shelors. At that time the Shelors will convey a permanent easement and the small parcel containing the water tank to the County. The Shelors will continue to permit access over the easement to the radio tower upon the annual payments of $5,000 until the final conveyances are completed. FISCAL IMPACT• Annual payments of $5,000.00 for not less than two years and any costs incurred in obtaining clear title to the parcel of 5.25 acres. Options available for payment of these costs include payment from the E-911 utility tax revenue account or from the Unappropriated Fund balance. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the approval of the proposed ordinance as the best possible resolution of longstanding problems obtained through extensive, good faith negotiations by both parties. Respectfully submitted, eph Obenshain S for ssistant County Attorney Approved Denied Received Referred to Motion by: ACTION VOTE Yes Abs No Eddy Harrison_ Johnson _ Minnix _ Nickens ` ~- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MARCH 26, 1996 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF A PERMANENT EASEMENT FROM DAVID W. SHELOR AND CONSTANCE R. SHELOR FOR ACCESS TO THE E-911 RADIO TOWER SITE ON FORT LEWIS MOUNTAIN AND OF THE SITE OF A COUNTY WATER TANK AND THE CONVEYANCE OF SURPLUS PROPERTY CONTAINING 5.25 ACRES TO DAVID AND CONSTANCE SHELOR WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke has constructed a radio tower on the top of Fort Lewis Mountain in the Catawba Magisterial District in order to provide effective and adequate radio transmission coverage for purposes of public safety and other essential governmental operations through the County's Enhanced 911 emergency radio system but is without a means of public or unrestricted access to this radio tower for purposes of construction, maintenance and repairs except by means of a private easement with the permission of the adjacent landowners, David and Constance Shelor; and, WHEREAS, the location of the easement is from the termination of State Route 643, Daugherty Road over and across the property of David W. Shelor and Constance R. Shelor designated as Roanoke County Tax Map Parcel #43.00-1-45 for a distance of approximately 4.3 miles to the top of Fort Lewis Mountain; and, WHEREAS, staff has negotiated the purchase of said easement from David W. and Constance R. Shelor for the sum of $10,000.00 and the exchange of other real estate; and, WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs that the acquisition of real estate be accomplished by ordinance; the first reading of this ordinance was held on March 26, 1996; and the second reading was held on April 9, 1996. r 5- THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to acquire from David W. Shelor and Constance R. Shelor a perpetual, non-exclusive easement for access to a County E-911 radio tower across a parcel of real estate owned by the Shelors on Fort Lewis Mountain, shown on the Roanoke County Tax Map as parcel #43.00-1-45, for the sum of not less than $10,000.00 to be paid in equal annual payments of $5,000.00 until all issues of title are resolved and mutual conveyances are made. 2. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to take all necessary steps and incur any necessary expenses associated with. removing a cloud upon the title to a parcel containing 5.25 acres previously deeded to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, designated as Tax Map parcel #43.00-1-43, and to convey such parcel to David and Constance Shelor and to accept in exchange the conveyance of the site of a County water tank from the Shelors. 3. That the purchase price shall be paid out of 4. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County in this matter as are necessary to accomplish the acquisition of this property, all of which shall be approved as to form by the County Attorney. 5. That this ordinance shall be effective on the date of its adoption. r r ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 26, 1996 ORDINANCE 032696-3 AMENDING AND REENACTING PORTIONS OF ARTICLE IV. SEWER USE STANDARDS, OF CHAPTER 18, SEWERS AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL OF THE ROANORE COUNTY CODE WHEREAS, the adoption of this ordinance is authorized by Chapters 9 and 18 of Title 15.1 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and WHEREAS, this amendment to the sewer use standards of the Roanoke County Code is required by certain changes in environmental standards mandated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Environmental Quality; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on March 12, 1996; and the second reading and public hearing of this ordinance was held on March 26, 1996. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Chapter 18, Sewers and Sewage Disposal of the Roanoke County Code be, and it hereby is, amended and reenacted to read and provide as follows: Chapter 18 SEWERS AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL ARTICLE IV. SEWER USE STANDARDS Sec. 18-153. Prohibited discharges generally. (b) Discharges into public sewers shall not contain: 1 f ~ (9) Waste, wastewater or any other substance having a pH lower than §T5 '~ or or any other substance with a corrosive'~~property capable of causing damage or hazard to structures, equipment and personnel at the wastewater facility. 15) Trucked or hauled industrial wastewa Sec. 18-154. Technical based local limits. (a) Discharges shall not contain concentrations of heavy metals greater than amounts specified in subsection (b) of this section. (b) The maximum allowable concentrations of heavy metals and toxic materials stated in terms of milligrams per liter (mg/1), determined on the basis of individual sampling in accordance with "Standard Methods " are: ...................................... (1) Arsenic: ~.;~~g? ..............:..................:.... ...................................... (2) Barium: 5.0 mg/1. (3) Boron: 1.0 mg/1. (8) Lead: 0.3 mg/1. (9) Manganese: 1.0 mg/1. (10 ) Mercury : ^~~~ : ~! ............... ............... ............... ............... (11) Nickel: ~ -9~f~. ?< .....................:.... ........................... (12) Selenium: 0.02 mg/l. (13 ) Silver : ~ .~<~?' .:............................ .............................. 2 (15) Cyanide: 1.0 mg/1. In addition, if it is determined that any one of these parameters exceeds the state effluent requirements for the wastewater treatment plant, an adjustment in the given parameter concentration limit will be required. To accomplish this, the discharge permits for industries discharging the particular compound will be adjusted to insure compliance. 2. That these amendments, additions, and reenactments shall be in full force and effect upon their adoption. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 3 cc: File Circuit Court G. O. Clemens, Judge, Roy B. Willett, Judge Clifford R. Weckstein, Judge Diane McQ. Strickland, Judge Richard C. Pattisall, Judge Robert P. Doherty, Jr., Judge Steven A. McGraw, Clerk Juvenile Domestic Relations District Court Joseph M. Clarke, II, Judge Philip Trompeter, Judge John B. Ferguson, Judge Joseph P. Bounds, Judge Ruth P. Bates, Clerk Intake Counsellor General District Court John L. Apostolou, Judge George W. Harris, Judge William Broadhurst, Judge Vincent Lilley, Judge Julian H. Raney, Judge Theresa A. Childress, Clerk Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Magistrates Sherri Krantz/Betty Perry Main Library John H. Cease, Police Chief Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke 24016 Roanoke County Code Book Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance O. Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Michael Lazzuri, Court Services Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue Thomas C. Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue Bill Rand, Director, General Services Thomas S. Haislip, Director, Parks & Recreation Elaine Carver, Director, Procurement John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment 4 s ACTION # ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 26, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Second Reading of Ordinance Amending Article IV, Sewer Use Standards, Chapter 18 of the Roanoke County Code COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: /J ~~Jw,e,~,.~ BACKGROUND: The 1972 Sewage Treatment Agreement between Roanoke City and Roanoke County requires the County to adopt such ordinances and regulations that conform to those adopted by the City of Roanoke as they pertain to Sewer Use Standards. The County of Roanoke adopted Ordinances on June 24, 1986 and again on September 12, 1989 in order to meet the above requirements. Recent requirements of the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency have required the City of Roanoke to further amend their Sewer Use Standards. These requirements are related to reissuance of the discharge permit for the regional water pollution control facility. The first reading was held on March 12, 1996. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Attached is the proposed amendment to the Roanoke County Sewer Use Standazds. This will allow our Ordinance to conform to the City of Roanoke Ordinance adopted on December 18, 1995. K- ~ Sections 153 and 154 of the Ordinance are amended to incorporate new technical based limits, a relaxed pH limit, and the new provisions relating to wastewater pumped from restaurant grease traps. Staff has reviewed all permitted Roanoke County industries that are presently sampled on an annual basis. Based on the past results, all permittees would meet the proposed standards. FISCAL IMPACT: This ordinance will not have a fiscal impact on Roanoke County. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt the ordinance after the second reading of the Ordinance amending Article IV, Sewer Use Standards, Chapter 18 of the Roanoke County Code. SUBMITTED BY: Gary Rob son, P.E. Utility Director APPROVED: ~'~z~ " Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to ACTION Motion by: VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy - - - Harrison _ _ _ Johnson _ _ Minnix _ _ _ Nickens ,~-i Sec. 18-153. Prohibited discharges generally. **** (b) Discharges into public sewers shall not contain: **** (9) Waste, wastewater or any other substance having a pH lower that 3-5 ~~ e~ °-°-'~T or any other substance with a corrosive property capable of causing damage or hazard to structures, equipment and personnel at the wastewater facility. ~*** (15) Truck or hauled industrial wastewater, ~ ` ice: ° ~ `~ ~t ~ `mid i~ ilk ~. Sec. 18-154 Technical based local limits. (a) Discharges shall not contain concentrations of heavy metals greater than amounts specified in subsection (b) of this section. (b) The maximum allowable concentrations of heavy metals and toxic materials stated in terms of milligrams per liter (mg/1), determined on the basis of individual sampling in accordance with "Standard Methods" are: (1) Arsenic: ~1~.~~~ (2) Barium: 5.0 mg/l. (3) Boron: 1.0 mg/l. (4) Cadmium: Aug-~1- ~ . (5) Chromium: (total) ~ 1 tel. (6) Chromium VI: ~ ~. , (7) Copper: ~- le~l , (8) Lead: 0.3 mg/1. (9) Manganese: 1.0 mg/l. (10 Mercury: A:AA3-~xg~ ~ . ~.~ f (11) Nickel: ~A-~g~: ~..~~~ 1. (12) Selenium: 0.02 mg/l. (13) Silver: A-~g~~,~ . (14) Zinc: ~ ~$ !atJ~, (15) Cyanide: 1.0 mg/1. In addition, if it is determined that any one of these parameters exceeds the state effluent requirements for the wastewater treatment plant, as adjustment in the given parameter concentration limit will be required. To accomplish this, the discharge permits for industries discharging the particular compound will be adjusted to insure compliance. c:\wpwinMiles\boards.96\03-12.96 K-1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 26, 1996 ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING PORTIONS OF ARTICLE IV. SEWER USE STANDARDS, OF CHAPTER 18, SEWERS AND BEWAGE DISPOSAL OF THE ROANORE COUNTY CODE WHEREAS, the adoption of this ordinance is authorized by Chapters 9 and 18 of Title 15.1 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and WHEREAS, this amendment to the sewer use standards of the Roanoke County Code is required by certain changes in environmental standards mandated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Environmental Quality; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on March 12, 1996; and the second reading and public hearing of this ordinance was held on March 26, 1996. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Chapter 18, Sewers and Sewage Disposal of the Roanoke County Code be, and it hereby is, amended and reenacted to read and provide as follows: Chapter 18 SEWERS AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL ARTICLE IV. SEWER USE STANDARDS Sec. 18-153. Prohibited discharges generally. (b) Discharges into public sewers shall not contain: 1 ~~_i **** (9) Waste, wastewater or any other substance having a pH lower than ~ t#~ or , or any other substance with a corrosive property capable of causing damage or hazard to structures, equipment and personnel at the wastewater facility. 15) Trucked or hauled industrial wastewa Sec. 18-154. Technical based 1OCa1 limit8. (a) Discharges shall not contain concentrations of heavy metals greater than amounts specified in subsection (b) of this section. (b) The maximum allowable concentrations of heavy metals and toxic materials stated in terms of milligrams per liter (mg/1), determined on the basis of individual sampling in accordance with ' Standard Methods " are: ..................................... (1) Arsenic:-~~--mcr/~.0 18.mg/1;. (2) Barium: 5.0 mg/1. (3) Boron: 1.0 mg/l. (8) Lead: 0.3 mg/l. (9) Manganese: 1.0 mg/1. (10 ) Mercury : ......................................... b: ~:c~~';;;mg/ ~-~: (11) N i cke 1: ~ ..................................... 6-mg f ~ . '~' (12) Selenium: 0.02 mg/1. (13 ) Silver : '6 ~-mg7`~ • ~>><?~g ~ ~> ....................,................ .................................. 2 K-~ (15) Cyanide: 1.0 mg/1. In addition, if it is determined that any one of these parameters exceeds the state effluent requirements for the wastewater treatment plant, an adjustment in the given parameter concentration limit will be required. To accomplish this, the discharge permits for industries discharging the particular compound will be adjusted to insure compliance. 2. That these amendments, additions, and reenactments shall be in full force and effect upon their adoption. agenda.code.sewer.sta 3 ACTION NUMBER / ITEM NUMBER L'r AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 26, 1996 SUBJECT: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1. BLUE RIDGE COMMUNITY SERVICES The three year term of Mrs. Cheri Hartman, Member at Large expired December 31, 1995. According to Dr. Fred Roessel, Executive Director, the BRCS will be meeting to recommend an individual for Mrs. Hartman's position which represents Roanoke County, and the Cities of Salem and Roanoke. The name of this nominee will be forwarded to the Board and must be confirmed by all three localities. 2. BUILDING CODE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS The four year term of Robert Allen Williamson, Jr. will expire April 13, 1996 and the four year term of Larry K Lester will expire April 27, 1996. 3. HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION SAFETY COMMISSION The four year term of Ms. Jackie Talevi, Legal Representative expired June 30, 1995. Ms. Jackie Talevi, has served two consecutive terms and is not eligible for reappointment. This vacancy is being advertised on the Government Access Channel and the Clerk's Office has mailed information and application to several citizens. When this information is received, it will be forwarded to the Supervisors. LI-~ 4. ROANORE VALLEY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE Staff is in the process of contacting two citizens recommended by Supervisor Lee Eddy. If they are willing to serve, their names will be placed on the April 9 Consent Agenda for confirmation. SUBMITTED BY: Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Harrison Referred ( ) Johnson To ( ) Minnix Nickens rn~-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 26, 1996 RESOLUTION 032696-4 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM M - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for March 26, 1996, designated as Item M- Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 9, inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of Minutes - January 23, 1996, February 13, 1996, February 21, 1996, February 27, 1996, March 4, 1996. 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals, and the New Century Council Vision Implementation Committees. 3. Approval of a Bingo Permit for the Vinton Moose Lodge #1121. 4. Acceptance of water facilities serving Steak and Ale - 419. 5. Acceptance of water facilities serving The Village, Phase III. 6. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Oakcliff Townhomes. 7. Acceptance of sanitary sewer facilities serving April's Meadow Subdivision. 8. Approval of a Raffle Permit for the Glen Cove Elementary School PTA. 9. Approval of a Raffle Permit for North Cross School. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and r directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution with item 3 removed for separate vote, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None On motion of Supervisor Minnix to approve item 3, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: .~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections .~ r January 23, 1996 ~~ Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 January 23, 1996 The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the fourth Tuesday, and the second regularly scheduled meeting of the month of January, 1996. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Johnson called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Bob L. Johnson, Vice Chairman Harry C. Nickens, Supervisors Lee B. Eddy, Fenton F. "Spike" Harrison, H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney; Mary H. Allen, Clerk; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator; Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator; Anne Marie Green, Director, Community Relations IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES The invocation was given by the Reverend Becky Proctor, •D January 23, 1996 55 plan be amended to cover only disabilities based upon line of duty retroactive to January 1, 1989. Pending disability cases would be paid based on any cause, but future disabilities would be limited to disabilities in the line of duty. The Board of Trustees also recommended that the benefit be increased from $10.00 to $12.00 per month. There was considerable discussion and concern about using the effective date of January 1, 1989 for the amendment. Following discussion, Supervisor Minnix moved to approve the Board of Trustee's recommendation, but with the effective date of amendments being January 1, 1996. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None Supervisor Johnson asked that Mr. Hodge check on the appointments to the Board of Trustees and their terms of office. 2. Revuest to amend the General Relief Program in the Social Services Department. (Dr. Betty McCrary, Social Services Director) A-012396-2 Assistant County Administrator John Chambliss described the General Relief Program which provides short-term emergency and non-emergency assistance to qualified persons. The 1995/96 Social Services budget for General Relief is $190,000, of which ,~ January 23, 1996 ~~ i- reconstruction and is seeking $433,669 from the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) Grant Funds to complete the project. Explore Park is requesting that the Board of Supervisors adopt a resolution of support for their grant application. No County funds are requested and this grant application would not compete with Roanoke County ISTEA grant applications. Supervisor Nickens moved to adopt the resolution. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None RESOLIITION 012396-3 SIIPPORTING THE SIIBMISSION OF AN ISTEA TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT GRANT APPLICATION OF THE VIRGINIA RECREATIONAL FACILITIES AIITHORITY FOR THE BRIIGH TAVERN PROJECT AT VIRGINIA'S E%PLORE PARR IN ROANORE COtTNTY WHEREAS the Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority (VRFA) currently is involved in a project to move, renovate, and adaptively reuse the historic Brugh Tavern at Virginia's Explore Park, to the benefit of the citizens of Roanoke County and western Virginia both through the preservation and interpretation of our heritage and the further development of our tourist industry; and WHEREAS the VRFA already has obtained $1,000,000 in private funding to begin this project; and WHEREAS the VRFA is seeking Virginia Department of Transportation funding through the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) for the sum of $436,669 to complete this project, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia as follows: ,, January 23, 1996 59 AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None Staff was directed to investigate further what costs would be involved. RE80LUTION 012396-4 REQUESTING THE VIRGINIA GENERAL ASSEMBLY TO ADOPT AN ACT SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZING THE CREATION OF A SMALL CLAIMS COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF ROANORE WHEREAS, the Virginia General Assembly in 1988 enacted Section 16.1-122.1 of the Code of Virginia, which provides the mechanism for the creation of a Small Claims Court within the General District Court in jurisdictions with large populations; and WHEREAS, the aforementioned statute has been amended several times by the General Assembly, to the end that it now allows for the creation of a Small Claims Court in any jurisdiction with a General District Court; and WHEREAS, Small Claims Courts already in operation in other jurisdictions throughout the Commonwealth have proven to provide an efficient, swift, and economical means of affording adjudication of claims to all citizens; and WHEREAS, there shall be no cost to local taxpayers for the creation of a Small Claims Court for the County of Roanoke. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County that pursuant to Section 16.1-122.1 of the Code of Virginia, as amended, the County of Roanoke hereby formally requests and petitions the Virginia General Assembly to adopt an act specifically authorizing the creation of a Small Claims Court for the County of Roanoke. The County Clerk shall forward a copy of this resolution forthwith to all General Assembly members representing the County of Roanoke. This Resolution shall be deemed an emergency measure and shall be effective upon passage. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None January 23, 1996 61 4. Ordinance to rezone 1.40 acres from C-2C to 2C to permit a contractors storage yard at 2032 Hardy Road, yinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of Bedford Continuous Guttering Inc. 5. Ordinance to rezone 1.07 acres from C-2 to I-1 to construct offices and warehouse for pharmaceutical supplies at 7605 Robertson Lane, Hollins Magisterial District. upon the petition of HCMF COrD. 6. Ordinance amendinc and reenacting Ordinance 82592 12, The ZoninC ordinance by amending section 30 54-2 (A) and 30-54-2 (B) to allow halfway houses only by Special IIse Permit in C-2, General Commercial Districts. IN RE: SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizinc the acwisition of certain interests in real estate for a well lot in Brookwood subdivision (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 0-012396-5 Mr. Mahoney reported that this ordinance reflects further staff negotiations to resolve the dispute with respect to an existing well lot located off of Woodbrook Drive in the Brookwood Subdivision. The matter has previously been on the Board's agenda on December 12, 1995 and January 9, 1996. Staff recommended Alternative #l, that the Board grant to Michael H. Frank and Marie Harrison a $3,000 credit to be used for an offer from them for the purchase of the Brookwood Well Lot when it is declared surplus. If their offer is not the highest .~ January 23, 1996 63 Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 1055, page 232, and being shown upon the "Map of Brookwood" recorded as aforesaid in Plat Book 7, page 77; and WHEREAS, an additional section of land is necessary to comply with the fifty-foot radius requirements of the State Board of Health for a public water source; and WHEREAS, the section of land to be acquired from Michael H. Frank is a portion of Tax Map No. 86.03-4-12, being a small triangular parcel consisting of 123 square feet, and the second section of land to be acquired from Marie S. Harrison is a portion of Tax Map No. 86.03-4-14 and consists of 1,512 square feet; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning this acquisition and conveyance of real estate was held on January 9, 1996, and a second reading was held on January 23, 1996. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the acquisition and acceptance of the required section of property, to comply with the fifty-foot radius requirement for the well lot (Tax Map No. 86.03-3-16) located off Woodbrook Drive in the Brookwood Subdivision, from Michael H. Frank and Marie S. Harrison,~is hereby authorized. 2. That the consideration for the acquisition of these interests in real estate shall be as follows: $400 to be January 23, 1996 65 AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None RESOLIITION 012396-6 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM L - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for January 23, 1996, designated as Item L - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 5, inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of Minutes - October 24, 1995, November 21, 1995, November 28, 1995. 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Blue Ridge Community Services Board of Directors. 3. Confirmation of Board Appointments to the Urban Partnership and Roanoke County Cable TV Committee. 4. Request for approval of a 50/50 Raffle Permit for the Women of the Moose, Vinton Chapter #1551. 5. Request for approval of a Raffle Permit for Planned Parenthood of the Blue Ridge, Inc. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: ,f January 23, 1996 67 I_ V ZN RE: CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMIINICATIONS David Courey, 3419 Ashmeade Drive, spoke against a tax rate increase to fund the school bond issue and advised that he would vote against it. He suggested that a parking fee for high schools could help pay for the bond issue. Supervisors Johnson and Nickens asked Mr. Hodge to discuss this possibility with the School Board and/or school staff. IN RE: REPORTS Supervisor Johnson moved to receive and file the following reports after discussion of Item 4. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. 1. General Fund unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contincencv Fund 4. Report of Claims Activity for the self-insurance program 5. Accounts Paid - December 1995 6. Statement of Estimated Revenues and Expenditures as of_December 31. 1995 7. Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per investments and Portfolio Policy as of December 31. 1995 IN RE: RECESS - January Z3, 1996 69 advised that he would support the 2 cents tax increase if the School Board commits to an independent firm conducting a value engineering study on the Cave Spring High School project. Supervisor Eddy stated that he would not support a tax rate increase until more information is available and the School Board has a prioritized list of projects for the next five years. IN RE: EBECIITIVE SESSION At 5:55 p.m., Supervisor Minnix moved to go into Executive Session pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1- 344 A (5) discussion concerning economic development prospects where no previous announcement has been made; and 2.1-344 A (7) Consultation with legal counsel pertaining to actual or probable litigation - Town of Vinton, and 2.1-344 A (7) probable litigation - Moose Lodge. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Harrison, Minnix, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None IN RE: CERTIFICATION OF EBECIITIDE SESSION R-012396-7 At 7:03 p.m., Supervisor Nickens moved to return to Open Session and adopt the Certification Resolution. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix January 23, 1996 71 in Plat Book 3, Page 20, and located in the Hollins Magisterial District. (Arnold Covev, Director of Enaineerinq & Inspections) 0-012396-8 There was no discussion and no citizens present to speak on this issue. Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: Supervisor Eddy ORDINANCE 012396-8 VACATING AND CLOSING A SECTION OF 50 FOOT IINIMPROVED RIGHT-OF-WAY REFERRED TO AS GRANVILLE STREET LOCATED BETWEEN THE INTERSECTIONS OF NORTHWAY DRIVE (ROIITE 1820) AND CHESTER DRIVE (ROIITE 1857) FOR APPRO%IMATELY 400 FEET IN LENGTH, AS R$CORDED IN PLAT BOOR 3, PAGE 20, AND LOCATED IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Stanley Birckhead, the petitioner, is the owner of Lots 2, 3, 4, and 5, Block 11, Map of North Hills, as shown on that certain plat of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Plat Book 4, Page 63; and, WHEREAS, said lots are adjacent to an unimproved section of Granville Street between Northway Drive and Chester Drive as shown on said plat; and; WHEREAS, the petitioner has requested that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, vacate and close the - January 23, 1996 ~~ following conditions: a. That all costs and expenses associated herewith, including but not limited to, publication costs, survey costs and recordation of documents, shall be the responsibility of the petitioner; and, b. That the entire area of the 50-foot right-of-way, extending approximately 400 feet in length from Chester Drive to Northway Drive, is hereby reserved and retained as a public utility easement, together with the right to provide maintenance to any existing public utility facilities located within the vacated area, and together with the right of ingress and egress thereto from.a public road; and, c. That the vacated area of land shall be added and combined, by deed or by plat, to the adjoining properties as provided by law and petitioner shall comply with the Roanoke County Subdivision Ordinance, the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, and other applicable laws, regulations and requirements, including recordation of the necessary documents, in connection with this vacation or any subsequent subdivision of the property. 2. That the Department of Engineering and Inspections shall record a certified copy of this ordinance with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, and the recordation costs shall be payable by the petitioners. 3. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson Asa z3 i ORDINANCE 012396-9 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A .7-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF WILLIAMSON ROAD AND COMMANDER DRIVE (TAB MAP NOB. 38.06-6-4, 38.06-6-5, 38.06-6-6.1) IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE BONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-3 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2 IIPON THE APPLICATION OF THE ROANORE COIINTY PLANNING COMMISSION WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on December 12, 1995, and the second reading and public hearing were held January 23, 1996; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on January 4, 1996; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing .7, acre, as described herein, and located at the intersection of Williamson Road and Commander Drive, Tax Map Numbers 38.06-6-4, 38.06-6-5, 38.06-6-6.1) in the Hollins Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-3, Medium Density~Multi-Family Residential District, to the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of the Roanoke County Planning Commission. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as an On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None IN RE: CITIZEN COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS 1. Jerrv Canada, Chairman of the school Board advised that the School Board and staff are visiting schools and Parent Teacher Association meetings to provide information about the April 2, 1996 bond referendum. He requested information from the Board on how the bonds would be financed and if a tax rate increase would be needed. Ms. Hyatt advised that in December, the plan needed a 3 cent tax rate increase, but now she believes that only a 2 cent increase is necessary. Mr. Hodge advised that they might be able to reduce the 2 cent rate even further. Supervisor Johnson directed staff to bring back a resolution to the Board on February 13, 1996 committing the Board to no more than a 2 cent tax rate increase or $1.15 per $100 assessed valuation. ?. Robert Ecbert, 3571 Bradshaw Road presented a petition expressing the citizens concerns about the state selling the Virginia Tech Farm and land surrounding Catawba Hospital, and requesting that the Board support measures necessary to ensure that the land is preserved for agricultural January 23, 1996 nn '` 6. Mr. Hodge described the current budget process. Supervisor Eddy recommended more Board involvement in the process but the other Board members disagreed. There was discussion on the use of year-end department savings. Mr. Hodge suggested that the departments keep two-thirds with the other third going to the General Fund. Supervisor Nickens suggested the ratio be 50$ for each. There was no consensus of the Board. Mr. Hodge updated the Board on the status of the salary survey. 7. There was general discussion concerning a transportation district, City status and charter changes. The Board agreed to the date for the joint meeting with Roanoke City Council on March 4, 1996. Mr. Johnson expressed support to include in the County~s legislative package a charter change regarding city status. IN RES ADJOIIRNMENT At 9:00 p.m., Supervisor Johnson moved to adjourn. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. Submitted by, Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board Approved by, Bob L. Johnson Chairman February 13, 1996 Q ~ I Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 February 13, 1996 The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the second Tuesday, and the first regularly scheduled meeting of the month of February, 1996. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Johnson called the meeting to order at 3:01 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Bob L. Johnson, Vice Chairman Harry C. Nickens, Supervisors Lee B. Eddy, Fenton F. "Spike" Harrison, H. Odell. "Fuzzy Minnix MEMBERB AHBENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney; Mary H. Allen, Clerk; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator; Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator; Anne Marie Green, Director, Community Relations IN REs OPENING CEREMONIES The invocation was given by the Reverend Branan G. Fe 13, 1996 at community meetings highlighting the need for the improvements at the various schools. School Executive Assistant Martin Robison presented a brochure about the school bond referendum and other information that will be presented to organizations and individuals who request information about the referendum. In response to a question from Supervisor Eddy, School Board Chairman Jerry Canada advised that no decision will be made on the future use of Cave Spring Junior High School if the bond referendum passes until it is time to vacate the school. Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the resolution with paragraph 4 removed at Supervisor Eddy's suggestion. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None RESOLIITION 021396-1 ERPRESSING THE INTENTION OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS OF ROANORE COIINTY TO LIMIT ANY INCREASE IN THE REAL ESTATE TA% - RATE TO TWO (2) CENTS OR $1.15 PER $100 ASSESSED VALIIATION FOR PtTRPOSEB OF RETIRING T8E PROPOSED GENERAL OBLIGATION DEBT FOR SCHOOL CAPITAL PROJECTS WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has requested the Circuit Court to order the special election to determine the wishes of the citizens of Roanoke County with respect to incurring general obligation debt for public school purposes; and, WHEREAS, said special election is scheduled for April Feb 1 Elementary School ($1,300,000) will be available in the fall of 1996 and spring of 1997, earlier than projected. The School Board is requesting funds to begin these projects and move forward with requests for construction bids immediately. Ms. Hyatt presented a reimbursement resolution which would advance funds in the amount of $500,000 until the Literary Loans are received. She advised that the debt service of $316,000 will be added to the 1996/97 debt schedule for payment of these loans. Supervisor Nickens moved to adopt the resolution with the projects to be subject to value engineering. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None Supervisor Johnson asked that Mr. Hodge bring back a report with recommendations on dollar figures for construction projects that should be subjected to the value engineering process. REBOLIITION 021396-2 OF THE BOARD OF SIIPERVISORB OF THE COIINTY OF ROANORE, VIRGINIA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO REIMHIIRSE ITSELF FROM THE PROCEEDS OF A FINANCING FOR CERTAIN SCHOOL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS The Board of Supervisors (the "Board") the County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "County") has determined that it is necessary or desirable to advance money to pay the costs of acquiring, constructing, equipping and developing certain improvements or expansions to William Byrd High School and Fort Lewis Elementary School ("Project") and to reimburse such advances with proceeds of one or more financings. Februa 13 1996 Fund. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 4. Recuest from yircinia Western Community College for funds for_imorovements to the Science Center X7,250) and site improvements ($66,379). mer C. Hodge, County Administrator) A-021396-4 Mr. Hodge advised that in 1995, Virginia Western Community College requested additional funds from Roanoke County in the amounts of $66,379 for site improvements, and $7,250 for a planned Natural Science Center at the Community Arboretum. While the Board approved funds for the college, these requests were not approved. Roanoke County is the only locality that did not appropriate the funds and VWCC is requesting that the County reconsider the request. Dr. Charles Down, President of the college, was also present at the meeting. Supervisor Nickens advised ,that he supported the funds for site improvements but did not support funding the natural science center because this was a request from the Educational Foundation, not the college. Supervisor Eddy announced that he had a conflict of interest because he was working with the contractors and would abstain from the vote on the Natural Science Center. Feb 1 should be contacted to obtain a valid survey result. The survey can be conducted by Martin Research at a cost of $7,500 which would include drafting the document, the telephone survey and a report analyzing the results. Supervisors Eddy and Nickens advised that they offered suggestions to improve the draft survey and Supervisor Nickens requested a copy of the final survey. Supervisor Minnix moved to approve the appropriation of $7,500 from the Board Contingency Fund to fund the survey. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 6. Recuest from the Town of Vinton to crovide water it wells become contaminated in the future. -(Elmer C. Hodcte, County Administrator A-021396-6 Mr. Hodge explained that in November 1994, the Board approved the petition of Shanks Associates P.C. to rezone land at the intersection of Washington Avenue and Feather Road and authorized a Special Use Permit to allow construction of a convenience store. Conditional approval of the use of coal combustion byproduct (CCBP) as fill material was included in the permit. During the rezoning the Board was assured from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the State Department of Environmental Quality that CCBP is not considered hazardous and Feb AYES: Supervisors Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Supervisor Eddy 7. Request to adopt a resolution reauestina a oval by the yirainia Department of Transportation of eight proposed aatewav beautification sites within Uublic rights-of-way. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning and Zoning) R-021396-7 Mr. Harrington reported that the Board included $18,000 for a gateway beautification program during the 1995/96 budget process which included design services, materials and maintenance. Designs have been prepared in accordance with VDOT specifications for plantings within the public rights-of-way, and VDOT has requested that the County adopt a resolution requesting approval from VDOT on the eight proposed beautification sites. Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the resolution with the changes as suggested by Supervisor Eddy. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None REBOLIITION 021396-7 REQIIESTINa APPROVAL BY THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OF EIGHT PROPOSED GATEWAY BEAIITIFICATION SITES WITHIN PIIBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY IN ROANORE COIINTY ____ February 13, 1996 n~ Roanoke County hereby agrees to pay 100 percent of the total cost for design and installation, and will provide for perpetual maintenance of this project in lieu of a permit fee or continuous bond for the eight proposed Gateway Beautification locations. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution with changes suggested by Supervisor Eddy, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None _8: Identification of members for the Com~rehens ve Plan Citizen Advisorv Committee and Technical Advisorv Committees. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planninq and Zoning) Mr. Harrington advised that preparation of the new Comprehensive Plan includes the creation of a Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) and a Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) to oversee the process and content. The Planning Commission has requested two citizens be appointed from each of the twelve community areas to the CAC. The TAC will provide advice and guidance for the technical components of the plan and members will be asked to serve because of an interest and competence in a particular area. He asked for assistance from the Board in the identification of citizens who would be willing to serve on these two committees. Febru 996 IN RE: RECONVENEMENT At 5:30 p.m., Chairman Johnson reconvened the meeting with all present: IN RE: FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizin the ac isition of easements to construct the Carvins Creek Sewer Interce for and the Glenvar East Sewer Main (Gary Robertson, Utility Director) There was no discussion and no citizens present to speak on this ordinance. Supervisor Eddy moved to approve the first reading and set the second reading for February 27, 1996. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ?. Ordinance vacating portions of a 10' waterline easement and a 20' sanitar sewer easement ac oss property of R. 8. Dickson & Company, DHA Ruddick Investment Com an located at the intersection of Hrambleton Avenue and Colonial Avenue. Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney) There was no discussion and no citizens present to speak on this ordinance. Fe 13, 1996 four year term representing the Catawba District, and asked that it be placed for confirmation on the Consent Agenda for this meeting. Her term will expire December 31, 1999. ,2s League of Older Americans - Advisorv Council Supervisor Eddy nominated Frances R. Holsinger to serve another one year term which will expire March 31, 1997. IN RE: CONSENT AGENDA R-021396-8 Supervisor Minnix moved to approve the Consent Resolution with item 2 amended to add the confirmation of the Library Board appointment. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None RESOLIITZON 021396-8 APPROVING AND CONCIIRRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SIIPERDISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AB ITEM K - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for February 13, 1996, designated as Item M - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 5, inclusive, as follows: = February 13, 1996 nn Supervisor Eddy• (1) He asked when the tour of Forensic Lab will be scheduled. Mr. Hodge responded that he is hoping for the March 12, 1996 meeting. (2) He commended the Police Department for their annual report and asked where citizens could find copies. Mr. Hodge advised that the report is in the libraries or copies could be requested from Police Department. (3) He asked when the Debt Policy would be brought to Board. Mr. Hodge responded that it will be included in the budget work session on February 27, 1996. (4) He advised that he wrote to the legislators urging the retention of the urban foresters that Governor Allen is eliminating. (5) He complimented the Virginia Department of Transportation on their excellent snow removal efforts during the February snow. (6) He announced that he and Mr. Hodge met with the Employees Advisory Committee and received a suggestion to change the meeting time for the first meeting from 3:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. Supervisor Johnson: (1) He advised that he asked Ms. Allen to look into obtaining voice mailboxes for supervisors. Ms. Allen described the program and costs. (2) He asked that the volunteers who are staffing the information desk be included in the volunteer reception planned for April 25, 1996. Supervisor Nickens: He announced that there was a recent court ruling that could affect the Commissioner of Revenue and requested more information. = February 13, 1996 1 (11 I items, incidental items and numbered projects. Roads anticipated to be completed or worked on in the next year include Chester Drive, Camney Lane, Pinkard Court and Sagewood Circle. He advised there are now 24 roads on the rural addition list with Willow Valley, Falling Creek, Rusty Road, Crescent Lane and Woodland Drive added this year. There are no funds included for incidental construction in the six year plan. These items have been included under the revenue sharing program. Most of the County's allocation goes toward numbered projects and this year, staff is allocating $2.62 million to be spent for reconstruction. The roads on the six year plan that are scheduled to receive funding are: Merriman Road, Yellow Mountain Road, Glade Creek Road, Colonial Avenue, Hollins Road, Woodhaven Road, Lost Mountain Road, Verndale Road, McVitty Road, and Old Cave Spring Road. Mr. Covey also presented a list of roads that were not added to the Six Year Plan because of insufficient funds. He asked for comments and concerns from the Board members. He announced that the public hearing will be held on February 27 and the Board will be asked to adopt the plan and agree to the County's share of revenue funding. ~ Discussion of the followinc budget issues: (a) CZP Draft; (b) vehicle Inventory; (c) vear-end estimated egoenditures and revenues ( ant February 13, 1996 ~ nZ r to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the Certification Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: NAYS: IN RE: adjourned. Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson None ADJOIIRNMENT At 6:25 p.m., Submitted by, Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board Chairman Johnson declared the meeting Approved by, Bob L. Johnson Chairman February 21, 1996 -~ 0 5 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 February 21, 1996 The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being a special meeting for the purpose of an executive session with action to follow the executive session. IR RE: CALL TO ORDER Vice Chairman Nickens called the meeting to order at 12:01 p.m. The roll call was taken. KB~IHERB PRESENT: Vice Chairman Harry C. Nickens, Supervisors Lee B. Eddy, Fenton F. "Spike" Harrison, H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix MElSBERB ABSENT: Chairman Bob L. Johnson (arrived at 12:6 p.m.) STAFF PREBENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney; Mary H. Allen, Clerk; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator; Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator; Anne Marie Green, Director, Community Relations Iii RE: ERECIITIVE SESSION At 12:07 p.m., Supervisor Minnix moved to go into Executive Session pursuant to the Code of Virginia 2.1-344 (A) 5: February 21, 1996 , n7 conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Certification Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None IN RE: RECESS At 1:25 p.m., Chairman Johnson declared a recess so that the Board of Supervisors could attend a press conference with Governor George Allen. IN RE: RECONDENEMENT At 2:50 p.m., Chairman Johnson reconvened the meeting. IN RE: NEW BIISINE88 February 21, 1996 -~ ~(~ APPROPRIATION OF FQNDS WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke and the Industrial Development Authority desire to promote and encourage the economic development of Roanoke County, Virginia, and the Roanoke Valley by the recruitment of new industry for the Roanoke Valley, in order to provide for increased employment and corporate investment in the County; and WHEREAS, this increased employment and investment constitutes a valid public purpose for the expenditure of public funds; and WHEREAS, the Company desires to support these economic development efforts of the County and the Authority by establishing its corporate facilities in the County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the execution of a performance agreement with R. R. Donnelley & Sons Company, Inc., Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, and the Roanoke County Industrial Development Authority for the establishment of certain industrial development facilities in Roanoke County is hereby authorized and approved; and all actions taken by the officers and agents of the County in connection with this transaction are ratified and confirmed. 2. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute said performance agreement on behalf of the County, upon form approved by the County Attorney. February 27, 1996 111 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 February 27, 1996 The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the fourth Tuesday, and the second regularly scheduled meeting of the month of February, 1996. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Johnson called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Bob L. Johnson, Vice Chairman Harry C. Nickens, Supervisors Lee B. Eddy, Fenton F. "Spike" Harrison, H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney; Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator; Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator; Anne Marie Green, Director, Community Relations IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES February 27, 1996 113 representing $267 million in investment and approximately 5300 direct jobs. IN RE: NEW BIISINES8 ~ Request for consideration of oroiects for 1996/97 Virginia Department of Transportation Revenue Sharing Program. (George Simpson, Assistant Director of Engineering & Inspections) A-022796-1 Mr. Simpson asked that the Board approve the prioritized list of 87 projects for the VDOT Revenue Sharing Program; authorize the chairman to sign the letter of intent to participate in the program; and defer appropriation of the funds ($500,000) until July 1, 1996. Mr. Jeff Echols, VDOT Resident Engineer, was present and answered questions. Supervisor Eddy advised that improvements to Route 11/460 are needed but it is not on VDOT's Six Year Construction Plan and he would suggest allocating some money to this project to get it started. Supervisors Johnson and Harrison agreed that improvements need to be made to Route 11/460 but these funds should not be diverted for that purpose. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the projects. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: Supervisor Eddy February 27, 1996 115 by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 3. Resolution aoorovinQ the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Budget for Fiscal Year 1996j97. (Diane Hvatt, Director of Finance) R-022796-3 Ms. Hyatt advised that the 1996-97 budget for the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission shows revenues of $5,043,982, and expenditures of $4,732,299, and that the airport operations are self supporting and no additional supplement is necessary from either Roanoke County or Roanoke City. The capital expenditure budget consists of $1,500,000 with $1,000,000 funded by State Aviation Grants and $50,000 by the Commission funds. On June 30, 1996, the County will make its final payment of $264,640 which constitutes the original ten year contribution to the airport. Supervisor Minnix moved to adopt the resolution. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None RESOLIITION 022796-3 APPROVING THE ROANORE REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION BIIDGET FOR FY 1996-97, IIPON CERTAIN TERMS AND CONDITIONS WHEREAS, Section 24.B of the Roanoke Regional Airport February 27, 1996 117 level of the facility. The contract allows for adjustment every five years, and based on surveys conducted during October and November of 1995, the Joint Library Committee recommends that there be no change in the allocation of costs, with Roanoke County's share remaining at 25~. The Board of Trustees reviewed this finding and endorsed this recommendation. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the staff recommendation of continuing the cost allocation of 25$ for Roanoke County for five years. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None IN RE: REQOEST FOR PIIBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES - CONSENT AGENDA Supervisor Minnix moved to approve the first readings and set the second readings and public hearings for March 26, 1996. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 1. Ordinance to rezone 315+ acres from R-1 AG-1 and services, located on Cotton Hill Road, east and west of the Blue Ridge Parkwav, Cave Spring Ma isterial District u on the etition of Boone Boone & Loeb. Inc. Supervisor Harrison requested that the staff furnish February 27, 1996 119 motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ORDINANCE 022796-5 FOR AUTHORIZATION TO ACQIIIRE NECESSARY SERER LINE EASEMENTS AND PROPERTY TO CONSTRUCT THE CARVINS CREEK SEWER INTERCEPTOR AND GLENVAR EAST SEWER MAIN WHEREAS, location plans for the Carvins Creek Sewer Interceptor and Glenvar East Sewer Main Projects have been completed and the projects will require acquisition of sewer line easements across certain properties; and WHEREAS, said easements are to be acquired to facilitate any future construction of the Carvins Creek Sewer Interceptor and Glenvar East Sewer Main Projects; and WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs that the acquisition of real estate be accomplished by ordinance; the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 13, 1996, and the second reading was held on February 27, 1996. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the acquisition and acceptance of the necessary sewer line easements for the Carvins Creek Sewer Interceptor and Glenvar East Sewer Main Projects are hereby authorized across the following properties, referenced by tax map number, from the following property owners, their successors or assigns: TAR MAP NO. PROPERTY OWNER Carvins Creek Sewer Interceptor 27.00-1-2 Hollins College Corporation 27.11-4-55 Jimmie R. & Dorothy P. Hollandsworth 27.16-1-1 Jeffrey E. & Melissa Ballard Glenvar East Sewer Main 55.13-1-3 Krueger Metal Products, Inc. February 27, 1996 121 SIIPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM M - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for February 27, 1996, designated as Item M - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 4, inclusive, as follows: 1. Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the League of Older Americans - Advisory Council. 2. Approval of Raffle Permit for Child Abuse Prevention Council of Roanoke Valley, Inc. 3. Donation of storm drainage, sanitary sewer, and waterline easements in connection with the development of Harris Teeter at the intersection of Brambleton Avenue and Colonial Avenue by R. S. Dickson & Company, d/b/a Ruddick Investment Company. 4. Donation of existing pump station lot and related access easement in Section 1 of The Gardens of Cotton Hill from Strauss Construction Corporation. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the Consent Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None IN RE: REPORTS AND INQOIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS Supervisor Harrison: (1) He reported on the meeting that he attended at Glenvar High School concerning proposed rezonings in West County, and advised that there will be another - February 27, 1996 ~ 7 Z scheduled by Bob Herbert, Roanoke City Manager, to request assistance for a Sports Complex near Victory Stadium. Mr. Hodge advised that he will attend the meeting and bring back a report. (4) He commented on a memorandum that Ms. Hyatt wrote to Management Information Systems asking for a change in the utility bills. He advised that he does not agree with threatening disconnection after only one monthly payment is missed, and felt that this change should have been approved by the Board. There was a discussion concerning penalties and monthly reading of meters. Mr. Hodge advised that the pilot project with American Electric Power for monthly reading of meters is in progress and he will report on the final plans soon. (5) He asked about the status of Cox Cable paying BPOL tax and Mr. Hodge advised that a report will be made on March 12, 1996. Supervisor Minnix: (1) He advised that he agrees with Supervisor Eddy's concern about putting threatening statements on the utility bills. Ms. Hyatt and Mr. Hodge advised that the wording will be changed. (2) He has received complaints concerning citizens walking dogs on leashes, but allowing the dogs to damage or destroy other citizens' property. He advised that there are penalties for these offenses and described them. Supervisor Johnson: (1) He recognized Keith Cook, Director of Human Resources, and advised that Mr. Cook will be retiring soon. (2) He reported that he attended the Burlington Elementary School PTA meeting with school administration staff to r February 27, 1996 ~ 7 ~ I IN RE: WORK SESSION 1. Discussion of the following budget issues: (a) Debt Policv; (b) CIP Draft; (c) vehicle Inventory; (d) Year-end estimated expenditures and revenues: (e) Rollovers; (f) IIDdate on BPOL Tax. The work session began at 4:20 p.m. with Budget Manager Brent Robertson updating the Board on the year-end estimated expenditures and revenues. Commissioner of Revenue Wayne Compton and Mr. Mahoney provided information concerning the BPOL tax. General Service Director Bill Rand presented the Vehicle Policy. It was the consensus of the Board that 411 and not 420 is the number of vehicles officially authorized, and staff was directed to reconcile the count and report back to the Board. Finance Director Diane Hyatt presented the proposed Debt Policy. After discussion, it was the consensus of the Board that the staff move forward with the policy, contact other localities or states for input as to how they handle, and report back to the Board for authorization in ninety days. Due to lack of time, it was the consensus of the Board that the work session be completed after the evening session. IN RE: EBECIITIVE SESSION The Executive Session began at 5:40 p.m. following the budget work session. February 27, 1996 127 IN RE: EVENING SESSION Chairman Johnson recognized the leader and members of Boy Scout Troop #236 from the Windsor Hills Methodist Church who were present. IN RE: PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLIITIONB, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Resolutions of Appreciation to John Molumphv and Larry Miles, Fire & Rescue volunteers, for over 25 years of service to Roanoke County R-022796-8 Chairman Johnson presented the resolution and "Quarter Century Club" plaque to Mr. Molumphy. Mr. Miles was not present and his resolution and plaque will be mailed to him. Mr. Joey Stump, Battalion Chief, and Ms. Amy Shelor, Fire & Rescue Volunteer Coordinator, were present and congratulated Mr. Molumphy. Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the resolution. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None RESOLUTION 022796-8 OF APPRECIATION TO JOHN MOLIIMPHY AND LARRY MILES, FIRE & RESCUE VOLIINTEERS, FOR OVER 25 YEARS OF DEDICATED SERVICE TO THE COUNTY OF ROANORE WHEREAS, Roanoke County is indebted to the volunteers who provide fire and rescue service during evening and weekend hours to the citizens of the County; and February 27, 1996 129 Road Six Year Construction Plan for Fiscal Year 1996-2002, and allocation of funds for Fiscal Year 1996-97. Geor a Sim son Assistant Director of Encxineering & Inspections) R-022796-9 Mr. Simpson advised that at a work session on February 13, 1996, the Board reviewed the Secondary Road System Six Year Construction Plan for fiscal year 1996-2002, and the funding for fiscal year 1996-1997, based on an allocation of $2.7 million. He explained that this was a public hearing for citizen comment on the issue. Mr. Arthur L. Kraus, 5854 Lost Mountain Road asked that the completion of the bridge at Lost Mountain Road and Twelve O'clock Knob be expedited. He presented a notebook to the Board containing pictures and a petition from the citizens. At the request of Supervisor Eddy, Mr. Scott Hodge, Assistant Resident Engineer for VDOT, explained the proposed schedule for this project. Supervisor Nickens moved to adopt the resolution. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None RESOLIITION 022796-9 APPROVAL AND ADOPTION OF THE SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM SIX YEAR CONSTRIICTION PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996-2002 AND APPROVAL OF THE ALLOCATION OF FIINDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996-1997. February 27, 1996 131 The facility will begin with a 10,380 square foot family life center, which will double as a worship place until a 14,225 square foot sanctuary can be constructed. The Planning Commission recommended approval with the condition that the petitioner will provide a 25 foot buffer yard with evergreen trees and shrubs per the ordinance. There was no discussion and no citizens requested to speak on this issue Supervisor Harrison moved to adopt the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ORDINANCE 022796-10 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO CHRISTIAN LIFE FELLOWSHIP PENTECOSTAL HOLINESS CHIIRCH TO CONSTRUCT A RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY FACILITY AT THE INTERSECTION OF ROUTE 11 AND STATE ROIITE 777 (TA% MAP NO. 54.04-3-1j, CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Christian Life Fellowship Pentecostal Holiness Church has filed a petition to construct a religious assembly facility located at the intersection of Route 11 and State Route 777 (Tax Map No. 54.04-3-1) in the Catawba Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on February 6,1996; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on January 23, 1996; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on February 27, 1996. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a February 27, 1996 133 motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ORDINANCE 022796-11 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 1.448-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED 6152 TWINE HOLLOW ROAD (TA% MAP NO. 63.04-3-18.1) IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF I-1, CONDITIONAL, TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF I-1, IIPON THE APPLICATION OF ROBERT AND I. R. STVERAR WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on January 23, 1966, and the second reading and public hearing were held February 27, 1996; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on February 6, 1996; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 1.448 acres, as described herein, and located at 6152 Twine Hollow Road (Tax Map Number 63.04-3-18.1) in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of I-1, Conditional, Industrial District, to the zoning classification of I-1, Industrial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Robert and I. R. Stverak. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the center of Virginia Secondary Route 778 at the northwest corner of the property of Charlie Lee Bratton (DB 1113, page 360); thence with the center of Virginia Secondary Route 778, N. 47 deg. 54' 54" W. 310.09 feet to a point; thence leaving Virginia Secondary Route 778, S. 29 deg. 53' 34" W. 149.25 feet to a point; thence S. 29 deg. 50' a February 27, 1996 135 the special use permit and include the condition to limit the area of the dental lab to 1700 feet. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ORDINANCE 022796-12 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO DENTAL PROSTHETICS INC. TO ALLOW A DENTAL LABORATORY AT 2121 ELECTRIC ROAD (TA% MAP NO. 76.07-4-32), WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERI- AL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Dental Prosthetics Inc. has filed a petition to allow a dental laboratory to be located at 2121 Electric Road (Tax Map No. 76.07-4-32) in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on February 6, 1996; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on January 23, 1996; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on February 27, 1996. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to allow a dental laboratory to be located at 2121 Electric Road (Tax Map No. 76.07-4-32) in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1-456 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia., as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved with the following condition: (1) The maximum size of the dental lab shall not exceed 1700 square feet. On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt the ordinance and include condition that the maximum size of the dental lab shall not exceed 1700 feet, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson February 27, 1996 137 AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ORDINANCE 022796-13 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 1.40-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED 2032 HARDY ROAD (TA% MAP NO. 71.07-1-39) IN THE VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C- 2C TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF I-2C WITH CONDITIONS IIPON THE APPLICATION OF BEDFORD CONTINIIOIIS GIITTERING INC. WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on January 23, 1996, and the second reading and public hearing were held February 27, 1996; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on February 6, 1996; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 1.40 acres, as described herein, and located 2032 Hardy Road (Tax Map Number 71.07-1-39) in the Vinton Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of C-2C, General Commercial District, to the zoning classification of I-2C, Industrial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Bedford Continuous Guttering Inc. 3. That the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts: (1) There will be no outside storage of materials. (2) There will be no more than 3 trucks stored outside on this property. (3) The use of the property is limited to a "construction yard" for a gutter installation business. February 27, 1996 139 Planing Commission recommended approval. There was no discussion and no citizens requesting to speak on this issue. Supervisor Nickens moved to adopt the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ORDINANCE 022796-14 AMENDING AND REENACTING ORDINANCE 82592-12, THE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR ROANORE COUNTY, BY AMENDING SECTIONS 30-54-2 (A) 2 AND 30-54-2 (B) 1 TO ALLOW HALFWAY HOUSES ONLY BY SPECIAL USE PERMIT IN C-2, GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS WHEREAS, on August 25, 1992, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted Ordinance 82592-12 which enacted a new zoning ordinance for Roanoke County; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission for Roanoke County held its public hearing on this amendment on February 6, 1996, and recommended approval of the ordinance adopting these amendments to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia; and, WHEREAS, in the interest of public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice, the Board of Supervisors hereby amends certain provisions concerning placement of halfway houses in the various zoning districts of the County; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law, and that the first reading of this ordinance was held on January 23, 1996; and the second reading and public hearing will be held on February 27, 1996. BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the Zoning Ordinance for Roanoke County, adopted on August 25, 1992, be, and hereby is, amended and reenacted, as follows: 1. That Sections 30-54-2 (A) 2. and 30-54-2 (B) 1. be amended to read and provide as follows: ARTICLE III. DISTRICT REGULATIONS February 27, 1996 141 0-022796-15 Mr. Mahoney advised that this is the second reading of ordinance to vacate several easements to facilitate development of the new Harris Teeter at the intersection of Brambleton Avenue and Colonial Avenue. He pointed out that on the consent agenda for this meeting, the petitioner was conveying to the County easements to replace those being vacated. There was no discussion and no citizens present to speak on this issue. Supervisor Minnix moved to adopt the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ORDINANCE 022796-15 TO VACATE PORTIONS OF A 10' WATERLINE EASEMENT AND A 20' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT ACROSS PROPERTY OF R. S. DICRSON & COMPANY, DBA RIIDDICR INVESTMENT COMPANY, LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF BRAMBLETON AVENIIE AND COLONIAL AVENIIE WHEREAS, by deed of easement dated October 30, 1973, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 984, page 439, Mick-or- Mack Stores Co., Inc., as owner of the subject parcel of land, conveyed a sewer line easement twenty feet (20') in width to the Roanoke County Public Service Authority (predecessor to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County); and, WHEREAS, by deed of easement dated March 15, 1979, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 1119, page 123, Mick-or-Mack Stores Co., Incorporated conveyed a waterline easement ten feet (10') in width to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County; and, WHEREAS, the petitioner, R. S. Dickson & Company, dba Ruddick Investment Company (Ruddick), is the current owner and developer of the parcel of land over which the above-described February 27, 1996 143 Easement (D.B. 984, Pg. 439) To Be Vacated Located On Parcel 2- A,' dated 8 February 1996, a copy of which is attached hereto, be, and hereby is, vacated; and, 5. That, in exchange, the proposed alternative easements as approved by Roanoke County shall be granted to the Board of Supervisors; and, 6. That, as a condition to the adoption of this ordinance, R. S. Dickson & Company, dba Ruddick Investment Company shall be responsible for relocation of the water and sewer lines, which must be acceptable to and approved by Roanoke County upon completion, and shall be responsible for all costs and expenses associated herewith, including but not limited to, vacation of the easements, conveyance of the alternative easements, recordation of documents, surveys, and relocation of lines; and, 7. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish this vacation and associated acquisitions, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 7. Ordinance vacatinc lots 16, 17, 18, and 19 of the Hidden Vallev Subdivision accessed off Indian Grave Road and located in the Cave s rin Macisterial District upon the petition of Jeffrey W. Hodges and Cher yl A. Hodges. (Georg e Simpson, Assistant Director of Eng ineering & Ins pections) 0-022796-16 Mr. Mahoney advised that there had been no change in this ordinance since the first reading. There was no discussion February ?7, 1996 145 respectively, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to Section 15.1-482(b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and, 2. That the Department of Engineering and Inspections shall record a certified copy of this ordinance with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, and all costs and expenses associated herewith, including but not limited to, publication costs, survey costs and recordation of documents, shall be the responsibility of the Petitioners, Jeffrey W. Hodges and Cheryl A. Hodges; and, 3. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 8. Ordinance to rezone 11.47 acres from R-3 to C-2 with conditions to allow commercial uses located on the west side of Ogden Road at the terminus of Leslie Lane, north of NS Railroad tracks, Cave SDrlna Mactisterial District, upon the petition of Industrial Develocment Authority (Angie Laing). (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zonins~ 0-022796-17 Mr. Harrington advised that is a request from the IDA to rezone three parcels of land owned by Angie Laing from residential to general commercial in order to market the properties. The Planning Commission recommended approval with one proffered condition. There was no discussion and no citizens present to speak on this issue. February 27, 1996 147 The Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County (Angie Laing). 3. That the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions, which conditions the Board hereby accepts: 1) A natural vegetation buffer of 100 feet shall be retained and maintained in similar condition of the western boundary of the Angie Laing property extending from the center line of the natural water course to the northeast boundaries of the residential properties defined as Tax Map Parcels 77.19-2-47; 48; and 49; and to the eastern portion of 77.19-2-17.19. This buffer shall not preclude the future location of a storm water management area in the vicinity of the southeastern corner of the Angie Laing property and the Norfolk-Southern railway line if the same is required by Roanoke County during site development. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: 77.19-1-1 BEGINNING at a point on the north line of the railway right-of- way, 5 1/8 feet S. 66 deg. 25' E. of the center of a double white oak, marked at "A"; thence a new line, passing the white oak N. 66 deg. 25' W. 237.5 feet crossing a 15' farm road to a small black pine standing on the west side of a ditch at "2"; thence down the west side of ditch N. 43 deg. 55' W. 211 feet to a point in the branch at "3" on the old outside line; thence with the old outside line, down the branch N. 25 deg. 33' E. 195 feet to "4"; thence N. 18 deg. 33' E. 326.7 feet leaving the branch near the corner to a stone on the south side of same at "5"; thence with Hofawger's and others lands S. 74 deg. 54' E. 853.4 feet to a point on the north side of the said fans road at "6"; thence crossing the said faun road at S. 29 deg. 2' E. 313.5 feet to a stake on the north line of the railroad right-of-way at "7"; thence along the north line of the railroad right-of-way S. 74 deg. 28' W. 719.4 feet to "8"; thence a tangent curve 116 feet to the Place of Beginning, containing 9.45 acres. 77.19-1-2 BEGINNING at old Corner 3, the southwest corner of the 0.367 acre parcel, more or less, conveyed to Warren C. Laing, et ux., by Lottie R. Jamison, said Beginning Point on the northerly side of W. F. Lockett Road being about 204 years, more or less, westerly as measured along the northerly side of W. F. Lockett Road from the point of intersection of same and the westerly side of an old road, which intersection is about 1/10 mile northerly from Virginia Highway Route 681 and about 1/4 mile from Virginia February 27, 1996 149 AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 9. 0-022796-18 Ordinance to rezone 6.7 acres from R-3 to C-2 to allow commercia_1 uses. located on the west side of Ogden Road. north of the NS Railroad tracks, Cave Sorina Magisterial District, upon the petition of Industrial Development Authority (Stranna Arthur). (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoninq) Mr. Harrington advised that is a request from the IDA to rezone six parcels of land owned by Stranna Arthur from residential to general commercial in order to market the properties. The Planning Commission recommended approval. There was no discussion and no citizens present to speak on this issue. Supervisor Minnix moved to adopt the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ORDINANCE 022796-18 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 6.7-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF OGDEN ROAD NORTH OF THE NORFOLK SOIITHERN RAILROAD TRACKS (TA% MAP NOS. 77.19-1-4, 77.15-1-12, 77.15-1- 13, 77.15-1-14, 77.15-1-15, 77.15-1-16) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-3 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2 IIPON THE APPLICATION OF THE INDIISTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AIITHORITY OF ROANORE COIINTY (STRANNA ARTHIIR) f February 27, 1996 151 fence corner post; thence N. 42 deg. 50' E. 664 feet to a fence corner post; thence S. 63 deg. 00' E. 105.8 feet to an old corner in the County road, and containing 2.16 acres, more or less. Less and except that certain .836 acre parcel formerly conveyed to T. R. Leslie and Eleanor Leslie, husband and wife, from J. T. Powell, Sr., and Hazel M. Powell by deed dated January 21, 1965, and of record in the Clerk's office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County in Deed Book 762 at page 307. 77.15-1-13 BEGINNING at an iron pipe in a bend of a road corner to (formerly Noah J. Wertz); thence a new line S. 42 deg. W. along a wire fence 244.9 feet to an iron pipe, on Wm. F. Lockett's line at 2; thence S. 30 deg. 20' E. 118.25 feet to an iron pipe; thence N. 59 deg. 40' E. 215.94 feet to a fence corner post at 6; thence N. 25 deg. 10' W. 193.35 feet to the Place of Beginning; Known as Parcel A-0.794 acre. 77.15-1-14 Commencing at the most southerly corner of the 0.20 acre tract for the Point of Beginning; thence N. 74 deg. 24' W. a distance of 112.24 feet, to Corner #3; thence N. 42 deg. 00' E. a distance of 123.88 feet, to Corner #2; thence S. 30 deg. 20' E. a distance of 118.25 feet, to Corner #5; thence S. 59 deg. 40' W. a distance of 40.00 feet, to Corner #4, the Point of Beginning, containing 0.20 acres, more or less. 77.15-1-15 BEGINNING at a tack in the top of a fence post at corner no. 1 at the west corner of the 0.197 acre tract property of L. M. Arthur and on the northerly line of the T. R. Leslie property; thence with the northerly line of Leslie property following existing fence N. 75 deg. 12' 20" W. 181.19 feet to an iron pin on the east side of a fence post at corner no. 2 and at the south corner of the E. F. Jamison property; thence with the southeasterly line of the Jamison property generally following the existing fence N. 42 deg. 39' S0" E. 269.87 feet to an iron pin at corner no. 3; thence with a new line through the property of J. T. Powell, Sr. and wife S. 47 deg. 13' 40" E. 160.45 feet to an iron pin at corner no. 4 on the northwesterly line of T. R. Leslie 0.794 acre tract; thence with the same and with the northwesterly line of L. N. Arthur property following the existing fence S. 42 deg. W. 184.87 feet to corner no. 1, the Place of Beginning, containing 0.836 acre, more or less. 77.15-1-16 BEGINNING at a point on the north side of W. F. Lockett's private road "A" corner to M. Boone's lot; thence running along the north side of said road a new line S. 31 deg. 45' W. 210 feet to a February 27, 1996 153 and scenic resource foundation to accept land donations, easements or cash to buy the development rights. Chairman Johnson advised that this subject was brought up earlier in the meeting by Supervisors Eddy and Harrison, and that staff was directed to prepare a report concerning various options for preservation of this land. Supervisor Harrison advised that he had received a response to his letter from Delegate Richard Cranwell in support of preserving the land. 2. Ms. Jan Dowling 3126 Garst Cabin Drive asked that the Board preserve the Virginia Tech Farm in the Catawba Valley from development; that the Board follow the County's visioning statements; and agreed that a land trust should be created. IN RE: REQIIESTS FOR PIIBLIC HEARINGS 1. Rernlest for Public Hearinc on March 26, 1996 for citizen comments on the Real Estate Tax Rate and the ~~Effective~~ Real Estate Tax Rate Increase. .(Brent Robertson, Budget Manager) A-022796-19 Mr. Hodge requested that the Board set a public hearing on March 26, 1996, for comments on the proposed real estate tax rate, and asked that the advertised tax rate should not exceed $1.13 per 100 of assessed value. Supervisors Johnson, Nickens, :4innix, and Harrison all February 27, 1996 ~~~ report on using the personal property and machinery and tools tax rates instead of real estate tax rates if additional taxes are necessary. There was no consensus of the Board to move forward with this request. Supervisor Minnix moved to set the public hearing for March 26, 1996, and advertise the personal property tax rate not to exceed $3.50 per $100 assessed valuation and the machinery and tools tax rate not to exceed $3.00 per $100 assessed valuation. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None IN RE: RECE38 At 8:20 p.m., Chairman Johnson declared a five minute recess to resume the Budget Work Session in the fourth floor training room. IN RE: CONTINIIATION OF WORK SESSION 1~ Discussion of the following budget issues: (A) CIP Draft; and (b) Rollovers It was the consensus of the Board that Mr. Hodge will bring back a draft of the rollover policy with 60% of the savings being returned to the departments after administrative review, and only non-reoccurring capital expenses to be included. Mr. Brent Robertson responded to questions from the supervisors March 4, 1996 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 March 4, 1996 The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Hotel Roanoke and Conference Center, this being the first Monday of March and a special meeting for the purpose of a joint meeting with the Roanoke City Council. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Johnson called the meeting to order at 12:01 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERB PRESENT: Chairman Bob L. Johnson, Vice Chairman Harry C. Nickens, Supervisors Lee B. Eddy, H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix, Supervisor Fenton F. "Spike" Harrison (arrived at 12:15 p.m.) MEMBERB ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney; Mary H. Allen, Clerk; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator; Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator; Anne Marie Green, Director, Community Relations OTHERS PRESENT: Roanoke City Mayor David Bowers, Council Members Wendell Butler, John Parrott, Elizabeth Bowles, William White, Linda Wyatt and Delvis "Mac" McCadden, Assistant City Manager Jim Ritchie, other City Officials, Thomas Brock, Past Chairman, Roanoke Regional Chamber of Commerce ~~ March 4, 1996 1 ~(~ their presence or when probable cause exists to effect an arrest. It also provides officers with arrest powers during their off- duty hours in either jurisdiction. Councilman White moved and Councilman McCadden seconded approval of the agreement. The motion passed unanimously by Roanoke City Council. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the amendments to the agreement. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None The agreement was executed and signed by all members of Roanoke City Council and the Roanoke Board of Supervisors. IN RE: REPORTS ON REGIONAL COOPERATION EFFORTS BY ROANORE CITY AND ROANORE COUNTY Thomas R. Brock, Past Chairman of the Roanoke Regional Chamber of Commerce, reported on the joint committees that have been meeting to review and recommend possible joint cooperative efforts for the future. He explained that these committees were formed as a result of a desire by both governments to find ways to cooperate and become more efficient, and is an outgrowth of the Towers-Perrin Report. He advised that four areas would be discussed at this meeting. The following committees comprised of staff from Roanoke City and Roanoke County presented status reports on their - March 4, 1996 1 ~-~ of recycling, and update on the stormwater management project were presented under the committee status reports. 5. Regional Sports Com~leg Councilman McCadden encouraged the governing bodies to move forward with a regional sports complex and a sports commission, and that the City of Roanoke and Town of Vinton be included in the project. Mayor Bowers asked that this item be included in the next joint meeting of the Roanoke City Council and the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. IN RE: ADJOIIRNMENT At 1:45 p.m. Mayor Bowers declared a recess of the Roanoke City Council until 2:00 p.m. at Roanoke City Council Chambers. At 1:45 p.m., Chairman Johnson adjourned the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to March 11, 1996 at 12:00 noon at Fort Lewis Elementary School. Submitted by: Approved by: Mary H. Allen, CMC Bob L. Johnson Clerk to the Board Chairman . ~ .. A-032696-4.a ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~"' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 26, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals, and the New Century Council Vision Implementation Committees COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUNII~IARY OF INFORMATION: The following nomination was made at the March 12, 1996 meeting. Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals Supervisor Nickens nominated Thomas Darnell to serve another four year term expiring January 22, 2000. New Century Council Vision Implementation Committees The following nominations were made by consensus of the Board of Supervisors at their March 12, 1996 meeting. County Administrator Elmer Hodge has contacted the individuals and they are willing to serve. Economy: Tim Gubala, Rick Whitney Education: Babette Cribbs 4uality of Life: Don Witt Health and Safety: John Cease, Molly Rutledge, Art Krause Infrastructure: Arnold Covey Governance: Al Thomason Leadership: Elmer Hodge RECOMMENDATION• It is recommended that these appointments be confirmed by the Board of Supervisors. r h ~ /n a Respectfully submitted, Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board Approved by, G~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Motion by Bob L. No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Johnson Eddy x Received ( ) Harrison x Referred ( ) Johnson x To ( ) Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals File New Century Council Vision Implementation Committees File ~~ A-032696-4.b ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER / II - / AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 26, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Approval of a Bingo Permit from the Vinton Moose Lodge #1121 for Calendar Year 1996, effective through June 30, 1996 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Vinton Moose Lodge #1121 has requested a permit to hold bingo games in Roanoke County for the calendar year 1996 on the dates listed in the application. This application has been reviewed with the Commissioner of Revenue and he recommends that it be approved. The application is on file in the Clerk's Office. The organization has paid the $25.00 fee. The Vinton Moose Lodge #1121 has been advised that this bingo permit will be effective only through June 30, 1996, since the General Assembly repealed legislation effective July 1, 1996, which granted authority for the County's current ordinance regulating bingo and raffles. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the application for a Bingo Permit from the Vinton Moose Lodge #1121 for the calendar year 1996, effective through June 30, 1996, be approved. SUBMITTED BY: ~.f '' Mary H. A len Clerk to the Board Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) APPROVED BY: C/i' ` Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION Motion by: Motion by H. Odell Minnix VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy x Harrison x Johnson x Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Bingo/Raffle File BINGO PERMIT APPLICATION ~.3 Application is hereby made for a bingo 'game permit. This application is made subject to all County and State laws, rules, ordinances, and regulations now in force, or that may be enacted hereafter and which are hereby agreed to by the undersigned applicant and officers of the organization and which shall be deemed a condition under which this permit is issued. Bingo games are strictly regulated by Title 18.2-340.1 et. sea• of the criminal statutes of the Virginia Code, and by Section 4-86 et. sea• of the Roanoke County Code. These laws authorize the County Board of Supervisors to conduct a reasonable investigation prior to granting a bingo permit. The Board has sixty days from the filing of an application to grant or deny tha permit. The Board may deny, suspend, or revoke the permit of any organization found not to be in strict compliance with county and state law. Name of organization ~fJYc? L c~,~~f.2 ~ ~A ~~'/t / ~'D©S~ - /-T"~ >J Mailing Address ~~ ~~<Z ~~ v~-~ /,ci~},S /~;n~~'v-v ~ v'~. City, State, Z ip Code f~ i~~ C3 1ll (..~~- • ~ ~ ~ 7 9 When was the organization founded? l gIPL~ Purpose and Type of organization CZ li~ ~~ /y?t~o ~f ~~~ ~ Has the organization been in existence in Roanoke County for five continuous years? YES ~ No ~~~r • S"Yd~ ~~~4 Is the organization non-profit? YES °-~ NO Is the organization exempt under g501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code? YES ~~ NO Attach copy of IRS Tax Exemption Letter. (If applicable) Does your organization understand that any organization found in violation of the County Bingo and Raffle Ordinance or Section 18.2- 340.10 et. r,eq. ~f t:~~ Cc+de of Virginia authorizing this permit is subject to h~vi„g such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organization who violates the above referenced Codes may be guilty of a felony? ~~ ~ Does your organisation understand that it must maintain and file complete records of receipts and disbursements pertaining to Bingo games and that such records are subject to audit by the Commissioner of the Revenue? _ _ U tis COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA P.O. BOX 20409 CONIlVHSSIONER OF THE REVENUE ROANOKE, VA 24018 1 . , Does your organization understand that it is a violation of law to 'enter into a contract with any person or firm, association, organization (other than another qual~fiod organization pursuant to S 18.2-340.13 of the Code of Virginia), partnership, or corporation of any classification whatsoever, for the purpose of organizing, managing, or conducting Hingo Games ? t~g-~ ~r,~- ~ GR088 RECEIPTS from all sources related to the operation of Bingo games or Instant Bingo by calendar quarter for prior calendar year period. HINGO 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter TOTAL INSTANT BINGO 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter TOTAL DAYS OF WEER AND HOURS OF BINGO ACTIVITY: Sunday r/' Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday From To From 6', 4 S To 'vc From To From To From To From To From To Any organization holding a permit to conduct bingo games or raffles shall use twelve and one-half percent (12.5$) of its gross receipts from all bingo games or raffles for those lawful religious, charitable, community or educational purposes for which the organization is specifically chartered or organized. (County Code §4-101) State specifically how the proceeds from Bingo will be used. List in detail the planned or intended use of the proceeds. Use~ejstimated amou/n`ts if necess'a/r~y~. / ~~vI~CTY1 T~•~5'T .~~ ~~i~.ctl~ ~~ ~~ COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA P.O. BOX 20409 COMIVIISSIONER OF TIC REVENUE ROANOKE, VA 24018 a Specific location where Bingo game is to be conducted? officers of the organization: /~_ 3 President : ~~li' ~ ~ ~ ~j ~ z'~. Phone : ~~~ ?~ ~ ~~~ _ +~ Z Address: ~ Vice President: Q~iy ~. ~~f:,j Phone: ~l„27- f ZLj / Address: ~~/,~. ~~ ~~5`~ U~rt.7`e,,y //,~. oZ ~/~ ~' Secretary : ~ ,D J G s ~~/~ '7a,~~n~ Phone : 3 ~~~~ I r Address: / 7 ~ ~,~`!5.-sue L~..~ ~`o, ~ f~i~ ~ o'`Z ~/?~ Treasurer : ~ ,~ ~ s Phone Address: Member authorized to be responsible for Bingo operations: Name : ~..,-.~ Home Address ~ ~ ~D7L ~ l_. llr,~ ~ ~ ~fI ~ y l Z Phone ~qQ~~~4 ~- Bus Phone ~ ~!~ /3 ~j~ Member responsible for filing financial report required by the code if your organization ceases to exist: Name : ~ ,~ ~ Home Address (/GC%/ ~ O~ S'Z U~L~r-,~j ~/f a~ ~ l 7 Phone ~~ 6'- lye P ~ Bus Phone ~9O ~-~ ~.~ ~~ Does your organization understand that it will be required to furnish a complete list of its membership upon the request of the Commissioner of the Revenue? \ ~' Has your organisation attaahad a check for the annual. permit fee in the amount of $25.00 payable to the County of Roanoke?~ IF ALL QOEBTIONB HAVE HEEN ANSWERED, PROCEED TO NOTARIZATION. COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIItGINIA P.O. BOX 20409 CONIlVIISSIONER OF TIC REVENUE ROANOKE, VA 24018 3 NOTARIZATION THE FOLLOWING OATH MUST BE TAKEN, ~d'l BALL APPLICANTS : ~, - I hereby swear or affirm under the penalties of perjury as set forth in 518.2-434 of the Code of Virginia, that all of the above statements are true to the best of my knowledge, information, and beliefs. All questions have been answered. I further swear that I have react and understand the attached copies of Sec. 18.2-340.1 et. sec. of the Code of Virginia and 8eatioa 4-86 et. nett. of the Roanoke County Code. signed by: Subscribed and swo County/City of tle Home Address before me, this ~ `~ day of 19~~ in the C~CQsrtOl.~ Virginia. My commission expires: ~ J 19~~ C No NOT VALID UNLE88 COUNTERSIGNED The above application, having been found in due form, is approved and issued to the applicant to have effect until December 31st of this calendar year. 3~~~~c~ -- Date Commis ner of th Revenue The above application is not approved. Date Commissioner of the Revenue COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA P.O. BOX 20409 COl~BVII,SSIONER OF THE REVENUE ROANOKE, VA 24018 4 r A-032696-4.c ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 26, 1996 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Water Facilities Serving Steak and Ale-419 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: P ~~ The Developers of Steak and Ale-419, S & A Properties Corporation, have requested that Roanoke County accept the Deed conveying the water facilities serving the subdivision along with all necessary easements. The water facilities are installed, as shown on plans prepared by Anderson and Associates, Inc. entitled Steak and Ale-419, dated July 22, 1993, which are on file in the County Engineering Department. The water facility construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact for this project. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the water facilities serving the Steak and Ale-419 along with all necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities. 0 C SUBMITTED BY: Gary Roberts , P.E. Utility Director Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) APPROVED: n~ ~ ~~~ Elmer C . Hodge County Administrator ACTION Motion by: Motion by Bob L. Johnson VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy x Harrison x Johnson x Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Gary Robertson, Director, Utilities Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Paul Mahoney, County Attorney e ~ DEED OF EASEMENT AND ASSIGNMENT ~ ~/ ;~ THIS DEED, DEED OF EASEMENT AND ASSIGNMENT, made this SST day of IQUS`[' 1995, by anct between S & A Properties Corp. ("Developer"), party of the first part; the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, ("Board"), party of the second part; and Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia, party of the third part. WITNESSETH: THAT FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual benefits to accrue, the Developer does hereby GRANT, CONVEY, ASSIGN AND TRANSFER with the covenants of general warranty of title in fee simple, unto the Board all water and/or sewer lines, valves, fittings, laterals, connections, storage facilities, sources of water supply, pumps, manholes and any and all other equipment and appurtenances thereunto, in and to the water and/or sewer systems in the streets, avenues and public utility, water and/or sewer systems easement areas that have been or may hereafter be installed by the Developer, along with the right to perpetually use and occupy the easements in which the same may be located, all of which is more particularly shown and described and designated as follows, to wit: As shown on the plans entitled Steak and Ale-419, dated July 22, 1993 made by Anderson and Associates, Inc. and on plat entitled 20' Waterline Easement dated September 9, 1994 and revised September 12, 1994 made by Anderson and Associates, Inc., John R. Christman, Land Surveyor No. 1414 and on file in the Roanoke County Engineering Department. The Developer does hereby convenant and warrant that it will be responsible for the proper installation and construction of the said water and/or sewer systems including repair of surface areas affected by kc/DE.doc 1 ' settlement of utility trenches for a period of one (1) year after date- of acceptance by the Board and will perform any necessary repairs at its cost. Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia, party of the third part, hereby joins in the execution of this instrument to signify the acceptance of this conveyance pursuant to Resolution No. adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. WITNESS THE FOLLOWING signature and seal: Developer: S & A P`RnO~PERTIES CORP. ItS: ce President James W. McCarthy STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DALLAS APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM The foregoing deed was acknowledged before me this I~ day of ~~.~ei„ ~~ 1995 by ~c 4~, ~ ~ ~~~ C_a~~~ , \~ , ~~ s es„ ~ ~ ~: on behalf of S & A Properties Corp. C~1~~~ ~ V~ C~, Notary Public My Commission Expires: ~ ~ -~~ Approved as to form: County Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia By: Elmer C. Hodge ~-y kc/DE.doc 2 STATE OF ,ry, /!~-` CO_ UNTY OF The foregoing deed was acknowledged before me this day of 1995 by Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator, on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. Notary Public My Commission Expires: kc/DE.doc 3 A ~-~ NORTH - ---- ~~ +~. / 1`1. M19 ~` ~~, - ~ Appe,~n.t. too.uon -t' 1E'TE]! lp BE NSTAUII) Br ROANdfE CDUNn ' ./-. ,\ « c~.t:.y st.n.1 0..:, trl. Q~~ CatTRAeiae sNALL coNNEGT To NEw e• YEIER s1..m a ~ 9 ~ rrEODU~eAt ,qNr RE5IRANlIG DENCE ~'" T 1r.o.9 GATE VAIK !BOX Ex]S /1N~/t1~s'MP M.. ~e.nJS ~ J, yM u, gyp, . ~O/vC st a 1401AwCAL JONT RESIRANNO REOV. Tap 39.0 1ST YI.1133.6 seem. a / ~ \ 1sTCP .. e.nss.3 ~ . Top-n3e.2 \ N'qi Yw. at.nJS.• ~ ~~ 12 CP 1n...I1JS.1 ~~ \ / Gen 15T0 gyn.. Out. n317 , ~•.'.• \ ~ ~ ~ ~, 12TCP w~ \ T~ OR YECNANIGL~T RESRtAB11NG DENCE RETYD. O MnJS.1 \ ~P .out-I,SS., .~ ~' \ ,. \V~t~51 " d'• a~i Aq' I ~ \\ 1r` ~ ii et« u~.~-~' b} ~.~',+',~ ~cp~ ~ \\ , ~!!I i110tTUE lRLT • YAN / y/~1 ?°~fo L d` Poo T'Ci ~ STALL UGFfT ~ 7oop~p~izieJ~ ~~ ~ANOAAD ~ ~, i/L-12,1: . L~ \y ~~ ~ f Hlboit M1,yC M1~ ~~ ~ ~ am a R£TNNNG MALL lE TO EXISTNC 6' MATER MAN MTf1 1M0 4S BD105 p`TfT~. 0 B ,' CriMYCAL JDg1T RFSIRABANG DEVK£ REO'D ~ IDTCP .11621 CuTw. . .~6'~0 //,e ra•RCP .I.. r,st.9 a. /• 3 NSTALL Ufi1T ~ ~ ~ E ~ ~ ~ ` , / STANOARD = ~ B.na, Uer.. a• . \\ = ~ aw.e sorer. o / k c.n..r cane.,. ~ci~c uNOE~ RCROUND - ` ee.. ea r.~gle Pa. D..elion.12J1L Tie ~' E,nWp \` •+Pnat ~ dj dp° ~® st tor, T ~. 1 /, Partny Lol h ~~ ~ T r20L7. < Emt.. ~ ~ ~ 15 CP w... T-1201.0 mat s t A PROPEPTES CdtP A r CP N.. Out-1199.7 Ponny lol~ D.B. 1J09. PG. t52 /; NSTALL UCNT STANDARD . ~ r - ~. s.,nRery uw_ j. J'^ ~ s `~ rov'12D7.. Qo~ i~.uox.. r ~• O' h~ o Concr«e y~~ ~/ Storm a c \ Curb M G.tl« Tap.1207.2 ~~T19Ky) 1JT~ r.. Out.1I019 Son~ipy .M. Too-' 13.a ~ ` ~, 20' $AN17M. sEMfR EASE Ri ~EN'P 165.2 ~ !\ O.B. 1309, P0. ISI ~ ~l. \ j' / 4000„ \- '~• oe. ,rEJD•~00Rp •~` ~ ~ •' +so tee--' `R `Una«geen. DKtrK Ln. ROANOKE COUNTY ACCEPTANCE OF RELOCATION OF WATER LINE SERVING UTILITY STEAK & ALE, RTE. 419. DEPARTMENT A-032696-4.d ACTION # ITEM NUMBER i -S AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 26, 1996 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Water Facilities Serving The Village, Phase III COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Developers of The Village, Phase III, Village Associates, Ltd., have requested that Roanoke County accept the Deed conveying the water facilities serving the subdivision along with all necessary easements. The water are installed, as shown on plans prepared by Balzer and Associates entitled The Village, Phase III, which are on file in the County Engineering Department. The water facility construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County. FISCAL IMPACT: The value of the water construction is $2,000. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the water facilities serving the Village, Phase III subdivision along with all necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities. SUBMITTED BY: Gary Roe son, P.E. Utility Director Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) APPROVED: ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION Motion by: Motion by Bob L. Johnson rn-~ VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy x Harrison x Johnson x Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Gary Robertson, Director, Utilities Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Paul Mahoney, County Attorney m-s DEED OF EASEMENT AND ASSIGNMENT THIS DEED, DEED OF EASEMENT AND ASS GNMENT, made this 6th day of November, 1995, by and between: hereinafter referred to as the "Developer," party of the first part; the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, hereinafter referred to as the "Board," party of the second part; and ELMER C. HODGE, County Administrator of Roanoke County, VIRGINIA, party of the third part. W I T N E S S E T H THAT FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual benefits to accrue, the Developer does hereby GRANT, CONVEY, ASSIGN AND TRANSFER, with the covenants of GENERAL WARRANTY OF TITLE, in fee simple unto the Board all water and/or sewer lines, valves, fittings, laterals, connections, storage facilities, sources of water supply, pumps, manholes and any and all other equipment and appurtenances thereunto, in and to the water and/or sewer systems in the streets, avenues and public utility, water and/or sewer easement areas that have been or may hereafter be installed by the Developer, along with the right to perpetually use and occupy the easements in which the same may be located, all of which is more particularly shown and described and designated as follows, to wit: As shown on the plan entitled The Village, Phase III made by Balzer & Associates and on file in the Roanoke County Engineering Department. rn-s r The Developer does hereby covenant and warrant that it will be responsible for the proper installation and construction of the said water and/or sewer systems including repair of surface areas affected by settlement of utility trenches for a period of one (1) year after date of acceptance by the Board and will perform any necessary repairs at its cost. Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia, party of the third part, hereby joins in the execution of this instrument to signify the acceptance of this conveyance pursuant to Resolution No. adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. WITNESS THE FOLLOWING signatures and seals: Developer : L ~ G, 4. By: , As : tb ~/~0.~ State of : V I~ZG l,~ ~Ar- County/may of : go,4r.7 O I~,t3 to wit The foregoing deed was acknowledged before me this: ~~ day of c 19 ~~, By: T .l~ rtn, i~ as ~ ~` k Du y authorized officer Title on behalf Notary Public My Commission expires : ~~ /`~ ~ (~ .''~ _ Approved as to form: County Attorney State of - /~j-- 5 County Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia By Elmer C. Hodge County/City of: to wit: The foregoing deed was acknowledged before me this: day of 19 , by Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator, on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. Notary Public My Commission expires: >, Revised 02/10/95 •. Z 7"`' '`.`. Scwool v' ,+~q{ao "/ 1 ' ~ BEUI~AH 11~5HTS ~~ ~~ ~yly) „j E~ssr.RC ti:cs m~ - '~ y ~., oQ e 9 ~4\ps L AY ~Ap/ T~ `\ I ,1V GIFNMONT DR . ~r ~ ~! tr PtY/ l]~7 ~.I•LE K lyJ 0~ -~~I°f'N,y '` ~~ w``((es GL~1y4@jFEpr~e "oRaN rNE ~ n £- O ' - " /)}! Plb ~~ fl~'CT~: Y Po/j` \rry,R y~n~~DR R }R CLfRS E" ~~ C..~u / jp ~1t 7 `` f~ ~ N 4 INSUta E O .~~vuM ~~Jj•~ iP~(\,{r,,.'_' ~ rr ~\Cp' JQ ~Ty~BIYD~/~j ~-..~ti' I CONVaNrES VPRRN .L~1" ~?f~a~ ._ W1'Jr~ 7!'f`F ~ l)~!: `"~jUDil(H °.'~'_ \ NOREp~•J( DD ~., o MfME Di ~` Mrre~ ~O~ i • IIE ttuB ~ ~L •, i ol- x -.- ` K~;a"~ su"E'~c ~~~[ ~ E orovrvniirr•Qx` I~ a jAf~~ ~ _ y~ ~ ~ `u"°o"°a e L O6 c;,~luu:~ ~/ f Z p4N~ ~~ \~` ¢x_. h'.lAl:". 2J"~1 ~ ILLR [wr •14G0 o !y ad° o, e9, pai . ,~~';:-ii;'a ~.+j„,~I~ ^ `~N vc^ N[ d•.0. 7 `' ~~f ,r -r„ r~. o ~I h• ~, a d? t 3 m E~~,,~~ KOLA E-~lKE_N_wK"f' .:u. n r, ~.i :c ~. e. ~ p N';~ii~ i,s`~orcNENCr BurN of Ro a r N0 .:, \ f ~ rT ~ ~+Ty,+riwnaRNluNS ~ " ~ I,. '.fRrINA 1N~c•~ ~&it' cy~'q ~ .+S' ~ 4 15Q ~•,r` q~ a ~~ ~ a .__-~ ~~Y l ryr.°iis~csr ~`r,g~ .r p I vEO .rr \ f. "~ s°n 'lo, r wu •':yir~~. . r~..._ ~ uanN~ ~IO!„`y P: r9 •~°~ ~ ,~ Da_~'~ ~_» ~' VI CINI T Y MAP ~„U.Y/LYH„~. `s _ _ 4M~, _ ~ /II-5 NORTH ROANOKE COUNTY UTILITY WATER FACILITIES SERVING DEPARTMENT VILLAGE PHASE III ACTION # A-032696-4.e ITEM NUMBER -°1D AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 26, 1996 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Oakcliff Townhomes COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Developers of Oakcliff Townhomes, Stump Brothers Construction, have requested that Roanoke County accept the Deed conveying the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the subdivision along with all necessary easements. The water and sewer facilities are installed, as shown on plans prepared by Balzer and Associates entitled Oakcliff Townhomes, which are on file in the County Engineering Department. The water and sanitary sewer facility construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County. FISCAL IMPACT: The value of the water and sanitary sewer construction is $17,500 and $15,000 respectively. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the Oakcliff Townhomes along with all necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities. m-~ SUBMITTED BY: Gary Rob son, P.E. Utility Director Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) APPROVED: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION Motion by: Motion by Bob L. Johnson VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy x Harrison x Johnson x Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Gary Robertson, Director, Utilities Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Paul Mahoney, County Attorney I •, ~~I / e\\\lJ J " DEED OF EASEMENT AND ASSIGNMENT THIS DEED, DEED OF EASEMENT AND ASSIGNMENT, made this 9thtda~y of November, 1995, by and between: ~~~ ~~"`"'-' hereinafter referred to as the "Developer," party of the first part; the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, hereinafter referred to as the "Board," party of the second part; and ELMER C. HODGE, County Administrator of Roanoke County, VIRGINIA, party of the third part. W I T N E S S E T H THAT FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual benefits to accrue, the Developer does hereby GRANT, CONVEY, ASSIGN AN1) TRANSFER, with the covenants of GENERAL WARRANTY OF TITLE, in fee simple unto the Board all water and/or sewer lines, valves, fittings, laterals, connections, storage facilities, sources of water supply, pumps, manholes and any and all other equipment and appurtenances thereunto, in and to the water and/or sewer systems in the streets, avenues and public utility, water and/or sewer easement areas that have been or may hereafter be installed by the Developer, along with the right to perpetually use and occupy the easements in which the same may be located, all of which is more particularly shown and described and designated as follows, to wit: As shown on the plan entitled Oakcliff Townhomes, made by Balzer & Associates and on file in the Roanoke County Engineering Department. -(6 The Developer does hereby covenant and warrant that it will be _ responsible for the proper installation and construction of the said water and/or sewer systems including repair of surface areas affected by settlement of utility trenches for a period of one (1) year after date of acceptance by the Board and will perform any necessary repairs at its cost. Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia, party of the third part, hereby joins in the execution of this instrument to signify the acceptance of this conveyance pursuant to Resolution No. of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. adopted by the Board WITNESS T E FOLLOWI G signatures and seals: Developer: ~t.'~e U By : ~'` ~' 'I ~%~ State of : ~~ L ~G-1 w l A- _ County/ of : ~-r~~ 1~ to wit The foregoing deed was acknowled ed before me this: ~'~- day of Gl~ ~ ~ . ~~ 19 ~, ny ; c~~~r.~c~ L~'. S: u. n.~.~ a s IE~ ~ ~ Duly authorized officer Title on behalf of S~~~r~-~.P (~~a~{.E~ ~'d~STRI~.C. ~ ~, Notary Public My Commission expires: ~~~~-cK 3~ ~ ~~~~( ' s • Approved as to form: County Attorney State of County Administrator of Roanoke _ County,_Virginia By- Elmer C. Hodge County/City of: to wit: The foregoing deed was acknowledged before me this: day of 19 , by Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator, on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. Notary Public My Commission expires: ', Revised 02/10/95 ~ . c ''Ear "` ~'°>"° :+''a`. _ _ ~' ti,.y<~~ 4.,, I ~ , ., ~ I ~I ~ i i ~I l ~ i'- \ I~ j\,r~ m _ ~ I'\ 1 -I I It 41 -- b ~~~/.Cpl l ~~T - / ~`t-. „ : ~ _' ~. opt y ~ `° } ~ . ti ~ ~~ -~ ~~ l j > ,~ - ~k ~ ~ . ~ / \ ~f M ) ~~ g1 1 -7 ~ ~ '`'~ .; . r7 \ .~'\. yr 9~j' ,~dl l l r ~ x ~ ~, y 2~ ~ l ~~»~+. ~...u ~ l mac. ~ , YY~3 , ~~ e j sl ~ ~ ,.r -. 1. ., ! a~ y~n....m...... m...~m....~..e......, ''' i ~ ~ v4r~ .l ~! _.. 1 !re .w~ m. r n..mra v samum .o ...r .a 4 T ~ N ar nru mruY n m• mvvn~ M ' '° ~' E yt °V c TVDIGI~ P?.YEMEaIi SGft'sl mc~ mrmnm m ~n maaan w w ~ .urn ~1 / } rt. W ~ as 4s .. mn .nunn. e,u. ..n. mau..~..-...-w-...a. L~~l.\ b R ~ r'4 \l - .~-W - - ! kL.~ .. maan. n..m m m.mn.......... w na. m. "' ~~4 ~e ~-``~ ~/~`~OIIOOH~1C Can ~ 1 ~ •~ir ~~, ~~ ~' ~. ^4194 n \! ~ 'ol. °K r. v. y d _\-~.,- a~ 4151. _ 1 ~ - r r 4 ,- ~ _ v r.. r• y'fD ~- - l-«i tali;) ~~;rsi,°h`°'~ ~t ~, 9` l ~: .+u~r~..:~i.':,.~,a~~n_~w~ -_ _-L~ e I • ~ \ 4'197 ~ ~ r t ew ii~a i . ~ a - e,a oo ro w ~, ; ~ ~ ~ -• , ~ , _ I wi nn~r ;l . ~ ~ v nz~oe ' i \ 4 ~ ~.,e =et H,, ~ . .~ ~ w 4198 ` \~ ~ , r t ~ 740 -- 4 - _ _ ' ~ + a T' .. _. ~ 'u ~~ ...r rrrs i-rw~ '31~ r~ 4'131 ~ ~ . a y v i wrrrrea ~r. usm ran •" am ei saE,f -- Y~y_I -. -.. ~ e,. yi42~__ _ / °'r ~ " °Y " ° ~ ® ~ j L W __ - ia+ ~ i . `+' ' - i ° auu r w U e air ie r ~ p. '~ f + yf ~ u a \ 1 i _ __ .. ~ C o r _ ~ < n~E~ S µ ~ - -L~ wT "'+ -_ 47`15 "~~ ~ =' 3 _ __.- , I ~ ~ ~ ~r ~~ r- 4' miner eorre+u ev. ~»~'~5 t _ i~.+G '__ ____ - __-~-=_ ion- .:.:.... l _.,__ ... _ __ - •. - - - - ~EOHTRI4N - -„u-- - ` _ - - --- ~. ' -. ~a - / ,a / II .:-I. l_ _. I ..-. _ D ~ ~ ..-~ _.. . .I ruuEt~ur ayi~M ,[ Cw.r=..n 4(~ Tiou ..eaeTe.~c+n ~. I it I eau ~aea.T~ -ow~or~.iie.~ ROANOKE COUNTY ACCEPTANCE OF WATER AND SEWER FACILITIES SERVING UTILITY OAKCLIFF TOWNHOI~S, SECTION 3 & 4 DEPARTMENT ` A-032696-4. f ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~'" / AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 26, 1996 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving April's Meadow Subdivision COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Developers of April's Meadow, L. T. McGhee & Company, have requested that Roanoke County accept the Deed conveying the sanitary sewer facilities serving the subdivision along with all necessary easements. The sewer facilities are installed, as shown on plans prepared by Lang Engineering entitled, April's Meadow, which are on file in the County Engineering Department. The sanitary sewer facility construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County. FISCAL IMPACT: The value of the sanitary sewer construction is $112,180. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the sanitary sewer facilities serving the April's Meadow subdivision along with all necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities. SUBMITTED BY: Gary Rob rtson, P.E. Utility Di ctor Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) APPROVED: Elmer C . Hodge County Administrator ACTION Motion by: Motion by Bob L. Johnson VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy x Harrison x Johnson x Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Gary Robertson, Director, Utilities Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Paul Mahoney, County Attorney DEED OF EASEMENT AND ASSIGNMENT THIS DEED, DEED OF EASEMENT AND ASSIGNMENT, made this 10th day of January, 1996, by and between: L.T. McGhee & Co. hereinafter referred to as the "Developer," party of the first part; the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, hereinafter referred to as the "Board," party of the second part; and ELMER C. HODGE, County Administrator of Roanoke County, VIRGINIA, party of the third part. W I T N E S S E T H THAT FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual benefits to accrue, the Developer does hereby GRANT, CONVEY, ASSIGN AND TRANSFER, with the covenants of GENERAL WARRANTY OF TITLE, in fee simple unto the Board all water and/or sewer lines, valves, fittings, laterals, connections, storage facilities, sources of water supply, pumps, manholes and any and all other equipment and appurtenances thereunto, in and to the water and/or sewer systems in the streets, avenues and public utility, water and/or sewer easement areas that have been or may hereafter be installed by the Developer, along with the right to perpetually use and occupy the easements in which the same may be located, all of which is more particularly shown and described and designated as follows, to wit: As shown on the plan entitled April's Meadow, made by Lang Engineering and on file in the Roanoke County Engineering Department. m~ The Developer does hereby covenant and warrant that it will be responsible for the proper installation and construction of the said water and/or sewer systems including repair of surface areas affected by settlement of utility trenches for a period of one (1) year after date of acceptance by the Board and will perform any necessary repairs at its cost. Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia, party of the third part, hereby joins in the execution of this instrument to signify the acceptance of this conveyance pursuant to Resolution No. adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. WITNESS /THE FOLLOWING nact~/ures and seals: Developer: By . <'ep-~- ~ per," As . s~ State of County/City of: The foregoing deed wa By: i IY tl as Duly authlor''i(~z d~ /o~f f icer T~ tl on behalf of 1.,. !. iYI C~~~ 3___ to wit: d before me this: Notary Pul~l3~c Q (~ My Commission expiresvv: _j - ~- '7 ,~ ' ~, ~ ` n~ ~ Approved as to _form: County Attorney State of County Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia By Elmer C. Hodge County/City of: to wit: The foregoing deed was acknowledged before me this: day of 19 , by Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator, on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. Notary Public My Commission expires: Revised 02/10/95 °.~ y 1Q 9 ~ ~-i~s - _ ~: ; tJ \ Rp a ~ ~aoNS~cK' f y`~e ~~~ ~~- ~° - - - ----\=~ _VI CINI T Y MAP ~. \\ a ..\ \'•~ -/4a~ •~ ~ ~\ -\ /y~-~ NORTH ROANOKE COUNTY SEWER FACILITIES SERVING APRIL'S !~ADOW UTILITY DEPARTMENT ACTION NO. A-032696-4•g ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 26, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Approval of a Raffle Permit from the Glen Cove Elementary School Parent Teacher Association COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Glen Cove Elementary School PTA has requested a permit to hold a raffle in Roanoke County on May 18, 1996. This application has been reviewed with the Commissioner of Revenue and he recommends that it be approved. The application is on file in the Clerk's Office. The organization has paid the $25.00 fee. The Glen Cove Elementary School PTA has been advised that this raffle permit will be effective only throuah June 30, 1996, since the General Assembly repealed legislation effective July 1, 1996, which granted authority for the County's current ordinance regulating bingo and raffles. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the application for a Raffle Permit from the Glen Cove Elementary School PTA be approved. SUBMITTED BY: Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Motion by Bob L. No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Johnson Eddy x Received ( ) Harrison x Referred ( ) Johnson x To ( ) Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Bingo/Raffle File RAFFLE PERMIT APPLICATION/h-g Application is hereby made for a raffle game permit. This application is made subject to all County and State laws, rules, ordinances, and regulations now in force, or that may be enacted hereafter and which are hereby agreed to by the undersigned applicant and officers of the .organization and which shall be deemed a condition under which this permit is issued. Raffle games are strictly regulated by Title 18.2-340.1 ~_ se of the criminal statutes of the Virginia Code, and by Section 4-86 g~= secr• of the Roanoke County Code. These laws authorize the County Board of Supervisors to conduct a reasonable investigation prior to granting a raffle permit. Tho Hoard has sixty days from the filing of an application to grant or deny th• permit. The Board may deny, suspend, or revoke the permit of any organization found not to be in strict compliance with county and state law. Name of organization ~~~ ~~4s~ Cc>v~ ~~f~~ i SC',~CC~O~ _ ~~ Mailing Address S °/®/' ~o~~~~ ~`'~-~ city, state, zip code ~/c~.~,~;c:r~~.-~ /~i~ ~'~'~~ i~ When was the organisation founded? / i 7/" Purpose and Type of Organisation ~u,Ol~~.2-`f 5< <v j CIS T~'~ C~~IF_~ ~~v~z. ,elf ,~~r,..;~~ Se L~a~~r ~. Has the organization been fn existence in Roanoke county for five continuous years? YES~_ NO Is the organization non-profit? YES ~ NO Is the organization exempt under 5501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code? YE8 ~/ NO ~~ c~r/`~ ~~ E ~i.~) ~o£,~ ~ 3 ~~g ,C L ~V 5 ~ p `~n~-> fo ,~ U Attach copy of IRS Tax Exemption Letter. (If applicable) Does your organization understand that any organization found in violation of the County Bingo and Raffle Ordinance or section 18.2- 340.10 et. se of the Code of Virginia authorizing this permit is subject to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organisation who violates the above referenced Codes may be guilty of a felony? ~~5 Does your organization understand that ft must maintain and file complete records of receipts and disbursements pertaining to Raffle games and that such records are subject to audit by the Commissioner of the R©venue? `EIS COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA P.O. BOX 20409 COMIVIISSIONER OF THE REVENUE ROANOKE, VA 2401$ 1 Does your organization understand that it is a violation of law to .enter into a contract with any„ person or firm, association, organization (other than another qualified organisation pursuant to g 18.2-340.13 of the Code of Virginia), partnership, or corporation of any classification whatsoever, for the purpose of organising, managing, or aonduatinq Raffles ? ~tj ~~ DESCRIBE THE ARTICLES TO HE RAFFLED, VALOE OF SUCH ARTICLES: Article Desaript_ji_on Fair Market Value ~ ~~} 7 G"h2- C / ~ / ~ ~-- ,,:~ c.~ C~ 4 S j $ ~ ~~ G t ~~ .1r ~,- C 1 tJ N ~ ~ ©.'t~~ ~ , Wffc'.. y};v e~ ~ c7`'~'' I 5 C ~e-~`~ ~ z S ~ C1e j c'l.~t^' j ~ ~"~p-i ~-~~Y' 1 •:~ ~ ~,~r •~~~ :a; ,,.~s..7~; ~: ~~ -) .. DATE OF RAFFLE d " T~ ~ ~l ~ ~ c% ~' If this application is for an ANNOAL RAFFLE PERMIT, list below all dates raffles will be held. Speaifia lo/raation where Raffle drawing is to be oonduated? (4 ;~ Cam' /~ ~l ci w1~ ~i ~v4--~ZC. //~ ~~~ ~i/~uCrl NOTE: Th s perm t shall be va d only for the above loaat on. Any organisation holding a permit to aonduat bingo games or raffles shall use twelve and one-half peroent (12.5$) of its gross receipts from all bingo games or raffles for those lawful religious, charitable, community or educational purposes for which the organisation is speoifically ohartered or organized. (county Code §4-101) State specifically how the proceeds from Raffle(s) will be used. List in detail the planned or intended use of the proceeds. Use estimated amounts if necessary. << ~/~c~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~v~~ ~ ~ ~ ~,~~,. ~~<<~~ cis°~ JJ / J -~/~ ~,~ ~~2rc~S • COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIItGINIA P.O. BOX 20409 CONIlVIISSIONER OF THE REVENUE ROANOKE, VA 24018 2 ~•Officers of the Organisation:, _ ~-g ` /~ President : ~,/ ~ ~'~"~ ~~~~ ~ ~ Phone : ~ ~'~ •- 3 ~~ 3l~ //~~ // Address: ~G 3S- ~.?ftti l~c)~j~ ~~~~-~~~ ~~'~i ~~- Z`f~}/'~j /~ ~ .. Vice President: ~~r,vc5t ~~~ Address: S~ s i ~'/~~~~ ~~ '~l ~--~ V i Phone : S(a ~ - .~ ~ / `l~ Secretary : ~''f-;'~_.-c ~~~~;~ .,,~~~,v rS Phone : S Gr L ~ ~ 4,~~/ Address • j / l.~ ~r~ ~' u,~,3 ~,y ~.-~ 4e-~~ ~r ~~. ~ ~~/ `/ Treasurer : ~~~ L<<~-% ~~caN ~ Phone : ~ ~ ~ ' U~ Address : .~ S /G ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~`~' Member authorised to be eap/onaible !or Raffle operations: Name : ~ r~ Sc7 •tii ~ „ ~ ~C~ ~ ~- Home Address ~oc'~ ~fLc Y L ~2.. ~ ~ ~ ~l~.ci lfe4 Z~v i c~; Phone .5~-f~d -~5`~rL-l4~%~' Bus Phone .SLF~ _ `~'S7-;~.~~'/ Member responsible for filing finanoial report required by the code if your organisation cease to/exist: Name : ~ .~;~ .~ ~ _ ~~? ~-~~~ Home Address .:~~~~~ .JuNz ~~~`L- /{--k~i G~~l ~~e' r~ '~~ 7 Phone S~fo - S~ L- /~ 5~ Bus Phone .S~o -- -~~'i Does your organisation understand that it will be required to furnish a complete list of its memb hip upon the request of the Commissioner of the Revenue? `~-~ Has your organisation attached a check for the annual permit fee in the amount of $25.00 payable to the County of Roanoke? `(5s IF ALL QUESTIONB HAVE HEEN ANBWERED, PROCEED TO NOTARIZATION. COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIItGINIA P.O. BOX 20409 COMMISSIONER OF 'THE REVENUE ROANOKE, VA 24018 3 NOTARIZATION ,'~VTHE FOLLOWING OATH MUST BE TAKEN HY ALL APPLICANTS: ~--~ .~ I hereby sxear or atfirm under the penalties of perjury as set forth in 618.2-434 of th• Cod• of Virginia, that all of the above statements are true to the best of my knoxledge, information, and beliefs. All questions have been ansxered. I further sxear that Z have read and understand the attached copies of Beo. 18.2-340.1 ~, a of the Code of Virginia and eeation 4-86 ~. a of the Roanoke County Code. Signed ~~~ ~ ~ ~sc,v~ ~~ 7~-a ~ ac~o~f _J~ti~` Name T tle Home Address Subscribed and sxorn before me, this ~ day of ~~19~ in the County/City of ~UCL.~U/~2, , Virginia. f ~(~ My commission expires: ~ 19~ otary Publ a NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED The above application, having been found in due form, is approved and issued to the applicant to have effect until December 31st of this calendar year. Date Comma oner of he Revenue The above application is not approved. Date Commissioner of the Revenue COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA P.O. BOX 20409 COMIVIISSIONER OF THE REVENUE ROANOKE, VA 24018 4 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~~ A-032696-4.h AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 26, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Approval of a Raffle Permit from North Cross School COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: North Cross School has requested a permit to hold a raffle in Roanoke County on May 11, 1996. This application has been reviewed with the Commissioner of Revenue and he recommends that it be approved. The application is on file in the Clerk's Office. The organization has paid the $25.00 fee. North Cross School has been advised that this raffle permit will be effective only through June 30, 1996, since the General Assembly repealed legislation effective July 1, 1996, which granted authority for the County's current ordinance regulating bingo and raffles. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the application for a Raffle Permit from North Cross School be approved. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: yna~y J~ c'Ze.c~~ Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board ~~. Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Motion by Bob L. No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Johnson Eddy x Received ( ) Harrison x Referred ( ) Johnson x To ( ) Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Bingo/Raffle File RAFFLE PER~YI~T APPLICATION /y,-9 Application is hereby made for a raffle game permit. This application is made subject to all County and State laws, rules, ordinances, and regulations now in force, or that may be enacted hereafter and which are hereby agreed to by the undersigned applicant and officers of the organization and which shall be deemed a condition under which this permit is issued. Raffle games are strictly regulated by Title 18.2-340.1 g~_ sea• of the criminal statutes of the Virginia Code, and by Section 4-86 g~= sea• of the Roanoke County Code. These laws authorize the County Board of Supervisors to conduct a reasonable investigation prior to granting a raffle permit. Th• Bosrd has sizty days from tho filing of an application to grant or deny th• permit. The Board may deny, suspend, or revoke the permit of any organization found not to be in strict compliance with county and state law. Name of Organisation f ~ «„n.~-~ G\~`~5 ~-hy~` Mailing Address y c~~~-~ Cy~ •~ ~~` ~ ~'!~4 ~- City, State, Zip Code ~ ~ C~ C~ ~~ ~ ~ ~`~~~ When was the organisation founded? ~.~ ~ ~ Purpose and Type of Organisation ~~ vG ~ ~--~ Has the organisation been in existena4 in Roanoke County for five continuous years? YEB~_ ~NO Is the organization non-profit? YEB~_ NO Is the organisation exempt under g501(a)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code? YES~C _ NO Attach copy of IRS Taz Exemption Letter. (If applicable) Does your organisation understand that any organisation found in violation of the County Bingo and Raffle Ordinance or Section 18.2- 34o.io et. se of the Code of Virginia authorising this permit is subject to having such permit revoked and any person, shareholder, agent, member or employee of such organisation who violates the above referanaed Codes may be guilty of a felony? S Does your organisation understand that it must maintain and file complete records of receipts and disbursements pertaining to Raffle games and that such records 'are subject to audit by the Commissioner of the Revenue? ~Q > COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA P.O. BOX 20409 CONIlVIISSIONER OF THE REVENUE ROANOKE, VA 2401 1 ;- Does your organisation understand that it is a violation of law to enter into a contrast with any person or firm, association, organisation (other than another qualified organisation pursuant to S 18.2-340.13 of th• code of Virginia), partnership, or corporation -~ of any alassifiaation whatsoever, for the purpose of organfsiaq, managing, or conducting Raffles ? \-t~ S DESCRIBE THE ARTICLES TO H$ RAFFLED, vALOE OF BOCH ARTICLES: 7lrtiol• Description l - L, ;~ ~ ~-~'^ ~ ~ ~ ~ c~ 1st. - L~cv r ~ ~ z - ~. ~ ~ -~ Csti ~ . ~ ~ c ~ vz_ - C..-~ `~ n5~ Fair l~[arket value ~T~ ~s-, ~9~v ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~~ ~as- DATE OF RAFFLE ~~~~ \ \ , ~~\~~ If this application is for an ANNIIAL RAFFLE PERKIT, list below all dates raffles will be held. 8peaifia location where Raffle drawing is to be conducted? NOTE: Th s perm t shall be Val d only for the above loaat on. Any organisation holding a permit to conduct bingo games or raffles shall use twelve and one-half percent (12.5~C) of its gross receipts from all bingo games or raffles for those lawful religious, charitable, community or educational purposes for which the organisation is specifically chartered or orgaaigad. (County Code S4-101) State specifically how the proceeds from Raffle(s) will be used. List in detail the planned or intended use of the proceeds. Use estimated amounts if necessary. ~ L w ~ G,1 ~~~ ~ ,~ ~ "7 Cs` c~ C- ~G~~Jw c~ ~ "~~-. ~ ~ . ~~~ ~ ~ COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIItGINIA COMIVIISSIONER OF THE REVENUE P.O. BOX 20409 ROANOKE, VA 24018 a Officers of the Organisation: ,/~-!~ President:3~v~n~ ~GVv~~~- ~ Phone: //~ Address: ~~ 1 ~ Sy~e.~ °~~ `~~ ~-C~C~'~vl`Q ~L"\U~~\ Vice President : ~ ~~\'~y-.~ 1~\. 'c ~~\~w~ n Phone Address: ~3 rya ~ ~Q ~ ~„ucx` ~`~ ~ UG nv~~ ~~~>~~ ``~ Phone Secretary : ~C~C ~ . ~-- \ \ ~- Address : ~~ ~ ~ ~ Q 6L ~~w`~ ~C~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ Treasurer ~ ~ ~-~ \sZ.. .-_.~~c~~ ~~: Ali \ ~ \ Phone: ~. 2~o~y Address : `~~ ~~ ~ ~~ nw~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ~~ ~- ~L UG ~v Member authorised to be responsible for Raffle operations: Name : L-~ . ~ ~ ~\ ~ ~- ~1 ~`~ ~ Q~ ~- Home Address y~~ ~ .\~~~, mac. k. ~ ~Uc~^"~ o~``~v~ Phone Bus Phone `-~~v~~~~ -~-~y \ Member responsible for filing fiaanoial report required by the oode if your organisation oeases to exist: Name: .-~c~CS~ ~~L...~.2n'y-1 Home Address ~`~~.\~ `(~(\C~ ~~~ ~ l_~ ~ ~.~. ^~ ~-~ ~-~-~.~~ ~ Phone ~~~ 1 \~ ~ Bus Phone ~~ Ls~u~ Does your organisation understand that it will be required to furnish a complete list of its membership upon the request of the Commissioner of the Revenue? S Has your organisation attached a obeok for the annual permit fee in the amount of $25.00 payable to the County of Roanoke? ~1p~ IF ALL QUEBTIONB HAVE BEEN ANBWERED~ PROCEED TO NOTARIZATION. COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIItGINIA P.O. BOX 20409 COMIVIISSIONER OF THE REVENUE ROANOKE, VA 24018 3 • NOTARIZATION ~~ ~ ~ THE FOLLOWING OATH IiUBT Hg TA1C8N HY ALL APPLICANTS I hereby shear or aflirm under the penalties of perjury as set forth is si8.2-434 of the Code of virginia, that all of the above statements are true to the best of my kaoWledge, information, and beliefs. All questions have been ansMered. I further shear that I have read and understand the attached copies of 8eo. 18.2-340.1 ~,~, son. of the Code of virginia and eeotion 4-86 ~_ sect. of the Roanoke County Code. ~~~ signed by: ~~~~ ~.:.c.~ S~ ~ ~~-~~,~, ~~~~ ~~.. r ~GGno~ a`t~\~ u.~ T do Home Address 8ubsaribed and s~rora before me, this Z~,_day of M~19~~_ in the County/City of ~- - • r,"~ U , virginia. ~ My commission expires: ~ ~ 1~9 No cry Publ a NOT VALID UNLE88 COONTERBIGNED The above application, having been found in due form, is approved and issued to the applicant to have effect until December 31st of this calendar year. Date omm ss er of a Revenue The above application is not approved. Date Comm ss oner of the Revenue COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA P.O. BOX 20409 COMIVIISSIONER OF THE RE ~ ROANOKE, VA 24018 4 ~~ GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA of General Amount Fund Revenues Beginning Balance at July 1, 1995 (audited) $6,994,906 8.09% Addition from 1995-96 Budget 10,558 Sept 12, 1995 Donation to IDA - Rusco (127,500) Feb 13, 1995 Va Western Community College -site improvements (66,379) Feb 21, 1996 R. R. Donnelley & Sons (2,500,000) Balance at March 26, 1996 $4,311,585 4.99% Designated for work done to date on Cave Spring Jr (367,000) Designated for debt service on new school capital (1,000,000) 2,944,585 3.41 Changes below this line are for information and planning purposes only. These amounts have not been appropriated to fund balance at this time. The increase in projected 1995-96 revenues is based on the most recent estimate of the year in process, and could be adjusted up or down as the year progresses. These funds are not available to be appropriated to other projects at this Balance from above Recommended increase in 1995-96 budgeted revenues based upon 6 month review Designated for debt service of new school capital $2,944,585 2,830,183 (760,439) $5,014,329 5.80% Note: Un December 1 x, 1 yyU, the rioard of Supervisors adopted a goal statement to maintain the General Fund Unappropriated Balance at 6.25% of General Fund Revenues 1995-96 General Fund Revenues $86,464,490 6.25% of General Fund Revenues $5,404,031 Respectfully Submitted, ..~.c~cz,.-~z.., ti . z..4~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance M:\Finance\Common\Board\Gen95. WK4 ~a CAPITAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Beginning Balance at July 1, 1995 (audited) July 17, 1995 Payment on sale of old School Administration Building Aug 18, 1995 Sale of land adjacent to Kessler Mill Road to VDOT Balance at March 26, 1996 Receivable from the City of Salem July 1, 1996 from the sale of the old School Administration Building Designated for new school capital improvements bonds Respectfully Submitted, Amount $405,409.00 399,984.00 1,020.00 $806,413.00 200,000.00 (1,006,413.00 0.00 ~~ ~. ~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance M:\Finance\Common\Board\Cap95. WK4 ~3 RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Amount Beginning Balance at July 1, 1995 (Unaudited) $1,773.00 From 1995-96 Original Budget 100,000.00 July 27, 1995 Survey of Needs -Four Year University (2,500.00 Sept 26, 1995 Red Line Service - CORTRAN (6,023.00 Nov 21, 1995 County share of Cox Cable Audit (1,700.00 Dec 12, 1995 Expenses related to Comprehensive Plan update (29,166.00 Dec 12, 1995 Sister City program (1,000.00 Dec 12, 1995 VML / VACO APCO Steering Committee (4,000.00 Feb 13, 1996 Special election on bond referendum (20,280.00 Feb 13, 1996 Special election for Republican primary (20,280.00 Feb 13, 1996 Survey of East County citizens (7,500.00 Balance at March 26, 1996 $9,324.00 Respectfully Submitted, Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance M:\Finance\Common\Board\Board95. WK4 ,J ~ ~ m f• N O ~- O I•l O O W W c~ r C Q a. q N a 7 c of a c+ > ~. a P K N .-. N ro O 7 t+ W ur d Q C) C W ~7 O U N a 4 Y ro 1 E ~ _ Yr N 2 LLI O 0. O J Q Y U G N a ~. F_ W a Y x roo cn i i V G 7 w m L a C a L9 0 A Z LL N a 7 c v. a o } a \ c r>: t arou r m r ro v a, a u • C ro a n La C i CI C r a > ; ( 0 4 .r ,= i V t C O c E 0 t 7 a I I I i I i I I 1 I I 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 i I 1 I I 1 i I I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I :1 i i • I ~ 1 I 1 I I • I r 1 I I I I 1 I I I I _ e R ~~ ul v UNIT ~ M r n ~ I nmr u r- Ir ~ o Q 7 T R -r-a 7 ~O r In a.-r N U O T a nLnr ))N h ulna r ~DDa U lnu D O [ Dcr D D O C D O C D o c 0 o u 0 o r o N r a b . M -- I r i N a a. ro~ rl I N T i a N L x L m a r n~ O , a L ' Yai N M ••+L N N W C ~ O• ••+ N r0 L a a a: a. ~ o .- c O O t c n n ~~ T. ., qI^ a ,. ~~ I vr-tnr-va m a~w Ut r- r-Ma•Ulm c wMlnwoy Na+w a+MO N N w N .0 [ N7 KM1~ r o rnovmo N !n Ul 6> x d 7 .- d NI- I t~ oMOM - ~ r- I- M r- .a c ,rtnLnwr-~ v o c+ U1 oD c i UlMr-Kmc ~N ~m~•r MIN N ~f o U1 M M wr-.-vx mU'iM.-Ul cYObxl- Nt')oN W w ? N • o 0 0 0 o c 0 0 0 0 0 f O O O O O f IUlooooc r- c> M 7 o L • M MMO_ r N V N ) L 1 q~ ) o. )o L n_ ) . C N • O a ) x • Y ro x ) N I- m x a r m . L 0. r a O T ) !+ ,.• a C 7 x '. N ~.. a ro-. c .+ r •.+ a ~ W J ~+ .Ui N ~ ~ I N C a J U a r+ -+ N •+ ro L N r !+ aJ a N J ~•+ C E a. ~ a •-~ 7 C ~ ro E ro N •~+ ] C T U C N J a ro o 0 7 _aaJCJmI JM?o.-N I ~NOJN~ 0 0 0 0 0 _ _ Y, I') n' •1 I ul .~ a D O] r c+ o' w - r'•w(l I w P 7 mxa N d M m M D •rU t•: r i r~ou w ~ - C:• `Y' U 1 o a 7 M o wo'.r w O! U w c - N U C . O o i roo c O O rlflo c trlnC - K w r N N -+ a ... a 3 L~ m a m c c o a .., V rV -~ ro J ~ L c a 6 D -+ U - U a ., s U t n a c +> G J L N _ O a D v x _ o ro . SFr: 7 KUI. U N N 1 > O O . n c Mwn. M r1 1' N - r w•.ar c+w U .-br om ~. w N d CUN- N N o M c x M a ic.-h M N [ I h N I MCU r P a . x c I.avn x o h 1 M V I . O O G r 0 o c . O O < . o o L roo L 1 w O a a x N T U r o O 6 E LL _ O O V U O: a n L - ..r rq v a a J v a + O L 1 £ 0. Kt I i N a a +v x. o ro x r I oFaD1 U N N i > O O . r--Ir y' in 1 m I'1 0. i n U"I 0. o c•h t.. r~ n_ nJ y P li M~rh ' a U 'i tU nJ ~ ^ <~~ (, w ~ ~ w U '- UY P IMaJ[ ir~r-c . o o c r O O C lolnr 1 N Ul c N - N a ~n LL a a rn :L C ~~ o r. r_ ... n .. 7 Y C m t O ocJ~ _ C I -+ ro ~ _ ro U E V _ C c ro > Q J [ no--( U M M t > O O ~ A r, I IaoCrt owU w N o. c• c+ r' I a r- r M o c r- - r• ~Mr N N r r- Nair ~ N m h ~ =r r•i n i OJ o U I m t9 [ (n CUR v.nr O O [ o N c .I O G• f O .- c • Y 7 0 w a~ !L ~ Y I L i 7 ~ oL U 0. n o c N L . a a ~ a .~ . _ LL V J V'r-t 1 M M 1 > O O < m- • r- U'I x Ln In I i ~ 1'1 ~9 L O.i G C •r m m m- f'.I O o L c> [Y~ r c r1 ~ ~> N aJ 1 RI O ,_ .r I .- Ir-N r•~ . O O •~o ~ L!I O 1 aj .- 1~~ a C T_i a ~~ L n 7 n .- a U -~+ N N :J ' _ w 0 L E _ O O IL L 0. ~ C N ] ro a J 7 ~ N C a a ] ~ _ a _L~a ]c,o t M ? > O O > 'i ~~ N r- 1I r- . w K a) N i x • a) 7 .r N r- N M N c~i m N n N 0 L J L ~ a U L •+ 11 > l L _ a o ~ L L L O 0. N N ~ a C ~ a L N at Y V - N S 7 7 O . A A „ + °~ H -Dna I S P G ~ i I M o• I n M M N o o M 7 0 --c r-oMO]r binm •rNObr•lnw N 7 I O .- a uU1 m N h mrur r-va N N O ~! m N.[ I N m U Ir-mr ih-o+c M--a I I -nJr vN~ Ul x h ~MNO 7 b M x .o r- N O• 7 M N Ln v r` .a c w o ^a:~. f- r ~~M D [U o (~ ~__r. ~Inr r- c• c m nJ r .D C C o x c o M < ~~ O IM w L O K < I M M t I a :7 r c .a ra K N N N ' 7 O O U a 1 C V ro a •+ L -. a N ~ I e U O ~ U a -sue: .- .~ 1NU7 > O O ~ ~I Lf) T o m v c ~v.-r ~qou INUY L 1--In- v - v - c 0 0 - 1 M M a r v~ L . Math ~M 0 . M o a rlnoh > N O C ;~~~ t. N U 1 7 N t ri O a Y ro 1 V .~ I c N a- ] I L.~ 7 a I N i I N ro ~ 0 a ~.+ J N U t C D -aa ] a x W uw a~ o v L J a ro I L Y- _ ro r. . r a . m 3 1 >--7i D.O U' i > O O . i q f , x N [ lnNc 7 0] G d •O F - 0 Ul r .D c ~ M ai . M 1 '- ) o h ~o r ) O ~ ro r I O . In N a U J J ^+ L ro _ a L • N a V- U '+ a i .q !L ~ D ... I , uv~ o ... C!l ¢ i ~wc+ 0 a..,t L r ro m U ~ U av' 3 W t o N . -W(qi > O O a m b N r' N m ro N 7 a~ M ~ mo N o aJ In I x M Q M 1 NU1 I c+ to 1 Q OD 1~ N b r r m N R ~- N a ] U ' L [ 7 O r Cn 0 J O. .c ) u C U r7 + C N p ..+ L 1 !L a t.. _ L N U a C _ t ro 1+ L ]or DIN M D T T > O O 9 A ~.: r~ I ~~ ~ I M M N r- P c• [U N P P V 'S r~ ri In Ln 0 0 r- r- u. m x a M M P P N (U H 7 'q 7 M r'1 M r7 l0 0 M r) r- r` K 7 V K c v x x M M 7 V ~ ~ m c• 0 O z w J Q J r Q o r r O Z a (~ n !1 ~ .- 1 - .. .• a •. _- - - - ._ - - .. - Fi r! "J P, 4, ,. S ~ n - .. a _ - .. ..._. I m i I 1 - Lo o i 1 i I Lu UI I ~ 1 ~~ r 1 , ~ n. ri I i i 1 Y- I I o ~ -- 1 I In CIJ [~ I % j I -~ 41 1 ... ,n 111 P ~ IP o I'] G• I, In o 1 (,J nJ U ~.I C .D b N E 1 Y 1 o ~ rn ~ J ~ ._ - -- ~ ut In •a ~ -r f I~ bt 1 7 o rt rU Y !'I ~ ~ !]. 7 7h N 1 Lit N c~ a ~ p1 0 1, [P fu 1 o P o? F ~a U1 c• P c-• a .O ~ x V U 1 iJ .O ? bl D Y I ,D • In m r rr ~n IJt .O .9 W C! m l 1 f- W I ~ - r I I I N N I m c• ~o _ Ul I M r•t m U) .- r~~ t`1 •- rl IJl 1 O? 0 7 °r h J N G. '!' ~n r- •O M n: C L d l O O .~ 1 r- C, 1't 0) P f-~ n Oi cn r 1 I~j ~ . f`7 •D to F- r .O O W r- rA M o ^~ d U 1 C 1 W ~~ P .` 7 n) I `_~ ^ ... tq O I- ~ r- t I - I rl fU t = f1 T N M~ Y ui r-_ M ri o) n E m 1 - cr nl n- I•t T l U? In fl i 1'l :~ - t' f 1 nt .-~ VI 1 , ^!' .O nJ rl G• O p• ro 7 ^• I M O ~f OJ r- A IU 7 r fI ~- UI t- M liI r O 7, .- - •U M ~ L U C m I m I P .- T - .- In n rl .- r1 . .- n Y r ~ .- 7 M - a O a I I r•1 r., . ... 1.'r I' ~ n. L Q 'O N 1 I a P d I m c, nl N LA c. -r m r- ~ .o fU r. nJ r- p u-I r•t m •r nJ v .- to rl .-. P r ¢ ~ L I o 0 o hl o rl <I' 7 U' ~0 Ul v M o? v: t- Ur y' Ul .- 0) I'- rl I11 -- c. r' 0` V N 7 1 I <9 ~ t'1 Ul nJ <'> Y ~!' o -! o o? rl r- ^ n c ~ •t o IIl J - .- c, r- nJ ... 7 y' - m c ~ ~ ~ u o i v o m -r r- fd n.i .' t- o r- v1 ~ Ln Ln lnl r~ ._ P m w ~ ~; c c. r -~ " ro N tir c I- I U~ m - n r- P r-. r M n r ~~~ r- r- - r- of .- ,~ .- .- v r- r f_ . o C W N r I I .- N- 41 y' N t- t'~ ~n P <? ... r-171- ..D M .-N N U' t.. m w a F- a x I 1 rn r7 Y o~ ai m nl ._ .- •.o of r- -' U ¢ W I - c n N 'm C V I -- o) m .'I Ul o Ul r-- r c, F- ., r- o? Y m •V o G L U. .+ C 1 U1 M nj I'- nl G+ .- .. 'S [n n] rU ,.~ r~ f-I 7 I•t -- t- . 4: N J] O m I f- M -- nJ t 1~- r; N t- ..~ t In n?I '1) , n) r. ) ; O ' 7 t11 N D 1 fCl o M r!1 nJ c t1 t- - O Ul N M c~ C!I t'1 I' f_ U ¢ c 1 N CU f•t o 7 CJ ~ CU 4l t!I m C N 7 1 r•I .- rl - t'l O W I V I (Y_ C 1 2 O W I I- N F- ~ d Z N 1 I L O d l lf• G+ o of- C. o r-nl UI Ln 0+7 G~ t- v r o..- N07 CUr o 0 > 7E L I o o cr tt7~ iYJ CU rr Ut Y G•~r N o oCUr [9 UI r N ~ W o Ln 1" C N •.+ J ..n 7 1 ~+ I ~O .O .l r o rU e. .- f~J r'l .- t1 Y ? N ~{ y' O) M M nJ P ~ v¢ L -.I n~ mri u. ~ a r~ .-nr ano ~o r .o --n .n r: O C V -' 9 I ~ ~D .- c :7 M G~ n: W 0.1 cn f- P .- nJ o 0 6, ~ N M t-! d y nom. C o C 1 d I M rt n M nJ nJ .- _- .n .- n.l •- U1 xU_ £ a I W x I ~ W r_ o O I a? r •n M o] N .O fU 7 U1 ll. Ut CU dJ ~0 07 N N 1f1 M llt 0.1 o O OJ d 1 m o c~ P- fU O sr fU 7 0 ^- ..0 0 l ? N t- n? rl r- M - o o m M Ul d 7 ~ C a 1 d I N f- OJ -~ f0 .- - llt o <~ IIi m M nJ !n UI .O M rl o lfr .- M rl ' ~ Ir 1 .e v-- .tJ C oln 1- r o-t •~ tn mMr-tq M MLn r-u o Lnc+ o D LL V 1 M o",r o) N N N c,NO f- f- •-U7 U1~ r MN 7r'tM O.- o d 7 1 N OJ N •-~ m 7 !•t Ln fd tU c In c. N [d o m V .o o sr .- f- L m 1 U '~ 1 !n Lf1 r? M VI M nl N c r'1 ~ N CO L 1 d c x r E d '0 ~ C C N t, W L ~ 9 ] C J 1+ ~ ! J n p ~ N v L . . C nl C IJ t9 H ~ a m e, JF E U E ¢.. r1 d rr L '4 q TJ ~•+ C 4- tJ •tt W Z 4- L >, m V In ... C V- W Z 4- d d L ~+ U l!1 4- ro J U .-. O > C F- ,U C V- m d o H H m O L r a. ~.. L O d L 3 Vl •+ ~+J C~ O ~U m 9 O d L O H Vi U a•+ V Cn N 3 N U ro <b < C U m ~"' m ~' N N C O N a I ro L ¢ .n c o u ~ ~ x u u ,- m .. d L W Z C A L N U N N N n) Q~ ~•~• L L C v ~+ ~+ l/ N Z ~ ~•+ O N L d E 7 .h O -+ > w s+ d In m C9 d U_ CD C s+ C U d V D N P L D ~-+ U .• C c > ro 1L > N ^1 F+ 7 V N C 7 In U C E d 7 ro ro C N O d L d y <r .. °a -+ cs m -+ -, L d o d ~ e to e. N d N In .. > d x [q ~ m d3 0~ -. o m c[7 xx v¢ ~ mN N ¢ o m -+ L o 3 o If y, o C d •-. o c 7 Z o 'u 1 0 -+ m 0 o N C E o C W V o N N d N m o -+ U ~.+ U <. .-I o Z o In L V - v 0 ~•+ N lu N M N v C f- 4 ro ~.. L ~~ .-. L ro U) 2 O o .+ d U o L E Y o d L o 7 G ~-~ m N o y .•. N~ [-• Y ~.+ o ~ C N 7 E U 3 L L '~ ~•. tT L C C J] 4 d N 7 U CI iF Ur d .+ O O ~-~ ro ~.• O N N C N N d 7 7 7 0 0 0 a/ ?r J [9 W t-r U > _1 It. V ¢~ t_n £ W C9 E d [n d..~. Y [A L O O C O O O O N O o O o I t!t O In o O In I 0 {!j O tl) O O Z o •- NM - NN NM fU' NMM 7 NN M M't V N ~ o ~ ~~ N NN M M M v V C v 7 W Ur UI Ul lfi 111 111 N LL O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I _ 1 i I ~~ i it i 4~ _r-- a b h ~,I tri Ins ww 1- n. n m c .. m IL a n L 4 b am Q `. c vro m C .• m N C o en w _ Q~ F- .. u ~• c o m - S- ll. y~no E O 7 V1 r_ u a ro c o w 1 ._ w In 1- c aZ L O 7 S c .• J 7 V O C U v a N a~ x W W v- o O 7 v L U U1 fUl b O }+I O tz • l i L 7 LL m L a C a t, 0 O Z l1 ~~ I O 0. 1 C J7 O 1 a E ~ 1 a ~ ~ a I ><u UI .rCmv I w JI ~ Ul m l -w m I ~ I b I a 1 L a I a U I J7 C I E m 1 7 •~ I u m I cml a I C 1 N a 1 L D 1 ~ E 1 v 7 I •+ U CI I 'O C f- I C W ~ I dl 1 aw I u I W I a ~ U 1 C I v m 1 c L I m J] ~ d I L I 1 ~+ v I L ~ I N V I c c I o a I >E nl W al Or 1 U 1 7 I ~ 1 I I rr r. n a r. n I ~, I .. r ' _ ~ rv ~ I I I I I ., ., - ~ . ~ r, - - -. I i i I I I i 1 I I ~ i i I I ~ n r9 ,n .n r.. i iV I .. ( it Pt t !/= I^ v 7 O UI P_, nJ O7 U1 O K O7 Off.- fI U I v' b o•' r~ In K c) In n7. _- p,! 6l j ~ ~ P n r~ I C Ul~j `~I r- , ~ i I i I i I 0.1 hl ~ji c "! T CIO O T ~ c r- cry . r- v' ~ a l __ o ~ o c l - - r r U t - UJ rt o) ~ n ~ ~r 07 I' ~~r't oc n r -IO Y- - t, ^ UI c• b o"i c ~~. nJ UrI7 In - U l N 7- ~ ~ o Ui M c. o N nJ ~- U~ Ut G + .~ N O1 T -r~r- *nJ I fY ~ (f-. o i b tpl o .- Y b nl ~' •~ IJl O Y Ul o Ut o N 7~ r- iU -~ of !~~ r- rt c c ._ b o nl - Ut lril ~~~ r'I o r'J lit r: r't ?. _ Nmm•- In r~ wln ut- ut r-^rn u~- utyra~w m b utr~ ~nq c - <~nJ lii nJ m In M ~ Ul N N m o 0 0 o m hl b O O;' U I oIM b o d' UJ W 0 tl P ~ O? o r, Wboc• Md'^ < r I x000 O+M N ct7-~M-- o c N -- 05 nJ m r 0 op p+N? l mNrout N U1 -- N ! N - m .-. E C 7 m S I L L O O « a T -c S_ > V L UI a ~+ C C N C O •+ a E O E t Y U a+ L m < u a N ~ L O C L U V O C a -. w K v V 1 C 7 .+ .b Trod m L a~ ~ L N T N L~ 1 x L ~ +~ a ~ L n N c.-, m N O 7 G.JG V U 0 0 0 0 0 FFrr-F 0 0 0 0 0 - c h7 •_ Ur ? i uo.-r'r "r nl cr Ui c u, m I'l fU 1 bmCUo rn.nMo I r-O N i o n! -- o > ^r-r_r 1 - .t.+ 1 1 E m 5 L O O r- n. a c c U O F• O c ! N a V U Q~ C E m c a a r r O L C O n o hJ a a rJ > N a~ a C n •h > O m ~ .+ L ~N OF ~ C ro ~+ ~ •+ L E U C a O .+ > c c.. m o o n .. O U 7 n-vwa Ui o Ut o ^N~NP ap aJlat ao 0 0 0 0 c o '~ lIt M I~ cC n v •- 07 r N 7 nJ F- 0 0 o c It 7 UI o r r'1 t" 9 0 _ In 7 M W U N .-oon Y In m •- Q. [ N 3 l C G a ro 1 E a O. t O V 1 i - > a a w .n c I~ t' m I .• J C 4- ~ 7 a N N E C C 7l E a L O ` o m,aa~ V > C ~ a m m o a V o a M O a a [ o U ^' m E ~ woE~ o Ut Utz --N~ m'mc~ . olo o < c C ~I7 0 II7 0 I '~ ^ rU -- •I O 1 U 1 I In s E C t n r. I _, ~. _ i ~+ . , L ~ l 7 0 R N 1 !_ .~ U I . ¢ a n L •-~ U I m I U C a ' ! O Irl J ., ~ < rn u. o a a - CY' K [ > Ut o t M 7 o~c.r 0 0 o r -~ 0cr•no ~ ,D Of oo ~- a+c i r~ 7 i , o il . i nJ `n ~ it Y R 1.1 ~.G U-~I ^ 0.n G• t r- cri Utj G• f - 7 Q W r- Ui n '~ . ~~ N b (L~ f I •- ht r~ r-- c' Ul 7 C 1 M f <, ( P. ..- tf-~ l -r , r- F I I M r•i ! ln~ o iU~ M Ul 07 r Ull cn iV Ut •- b I - l Y o 0 O 1 1'1 .- rl~ o N Ul ~ M r cl ut ^ ~ 1 u] o~ c rn nl • ~ c i ^ I ~ o_. I I u:. n. Y c -r on n c N n Y r 7 < o 0 N D7o G r- UI -- - FaDUI 0 .- M o a M M a n~ - 1 t a U I 7 C e, m ~ u •. m ~ I C m N v ! ro 0] a C 1 -+ U 7 m ~ -• O m a > u r r L U ] T m a 4 G U •+ t!N I~ C L T n a d.a L _ ~ O m O 7 C L C 1+ 5 •~ a L C t ~ a a a C m ~+ > U O C C C t oNMU] rut Urtnur ~• co+cc ~ 0 0 0 0 II mr ~~ hJ s0 ~ o t r- r- 7 O N a J w a N c m L F- 1 1 V ' C > 7 > 0. ~ L > a C b ~ ci o~ a 1 x r N r ~ r N 1 b m K V 7 n e U N L n a _ ~ n vl C - ro L ] r- 7 0 b 0 m 0 i U D r a v i I~ I i I I~ ~I nJ t !n r v~ 1 n! c I/ Ul r- ~ n w i p N c• n u] i U N r- a b p 7J ~ M c - r~ n b n m n w O m hl r'1 O Z la. J d H O 4 F f F f r I ACTION # ITEM NUMBER~~ i AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 26, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Accounts Paid -February 1996 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENT SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Payments to Vendors: $3,065,541.48 Payroll: 2/9/96 $620,562.67 2/23/96 594,377.92 . 2/26/96 524.25 1,215,464.84 $4,281,006.32 A detailed listing of the payments is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. SUBMITTED BY: YV tn.,,~r ,~ ~ • ti~ ~c~/ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance APPROVED: ~Y~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator 5 • • Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To () Motion by Eddy Harrison Johnson Minnix Nickens No Yes Abs • ,ap C-'yB 1~ ~ I lid J i"f ~'4ha 7'tew"~, ~. C®R~A~®NW~~~,'I'H of V~R~~N~A DAVID R. GEHR COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1401 EAST BROAD STREET RICHMOND, 23219-1939 March 5, 1996 Mr. Elmer C. Hodge Roanoke County P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 Dear Mr. Hodge: ~v JAMES S. GIVENS STATE SECONDARY ROADS ENGINEER The enclosed report contains a list of all changes to the Secondary System of State Highways in your county approved by the State Secondary Roads Engineer in February 1996. These changes will be presented to the Commonwealth Transporta- tion Board at its monthly meeting on March 21, 1996. If you have any questions or comments about this report, please call Martin Law at 786-7399. r James S. Givens ~ ~ State Secondary ads Engineer JSG/MII TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY > P P P P P P ' ~o U O~ P P U P U ~ ~ U U \ \ \ \ \ \ 0) \ ~O ~O ~O ~O ~o ~O v- ~O N N N N N N ~ W N N N N N N N 01 Y 07 ~ U P U U U O~ O~ ~ U O~ U U O~ O~ O~ M I~ ti ti ~ n ~ N _ N N N N N N O \ \ \ \ \ \ \ CL ~O ~O ~O ~O ~O ~O ~O O o O O O O O ~ N 0 01 O 1 N 0 0 N 07 O O O O O O O N F Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N N N N N N 3 d 3 3 N 3 3 L L L L t L L 7 ~ L 7 L L 7 7 O E O O ~ O O O O O N N Z fA Z Z N N F N W v N ~T O \ d 0 d LA W N P O) ~O -~ 00 ~O I~ J M M _ 1 ~O N ~O _ F E f ~ f E f N 0) 0) N W 07 0) ~ ~ Y 1 Y O Y O Y ~ Y DO Y O Y U O 7 7 ~t 7 N 7 N 7 00 7 N 7 U O O O O O O O .- O OC O ~ O ~ O OC O OC O ar O OC N Y (~ N S 1. O U W N ~ 3 L Q L Y f O) 7 E o x o N 0 L LL ~ 1 ~ ~ M ~ a + 00 ~O .T M Q 07 ~ ~ ~T ~O N ~O .- 0 ~ 0 0 N OJ N N 0/ 0) N N Z ~F 1(1 O Y 7 Y 7 Y 7 Y 7 Y 7 Y 7 Y 7 O O O O O O O O O O CC OC d' ~ 0' OC 0: ~ E Q 4r F Y L CC O N ~ 01 ~ a to E VI 7 z >. z Q L C N d ~ "O M 7 If I M O 0 00 x O O N M O ~O M ~ U d' ~ 00 CO O~ U J 0/ Q N ~ ~ ~ 3 N f 0 f 0 f 0 L ~ ~ o O + + "O a ' F W "O ~ y ~ O E d' O L N L U 07 K O O 07 N N Z 0) Y O. d' d CL W 0/ C L L S 1- O) C Y 0) 0] J 0) D_ U d Y O Y L O N F- O N O L L "~ '0 L d 2 $ F U Y O C T ~ fn O O OJ L N C Y F 3 L fp 'O 01 N ~ E v o ar L o m m o L m d W 3 > U C7 C7 C7 w o< ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N N N N N N N N N O W O O N O W O W O W O W U/ to U 1!1 1!1 41 1(1 U 1!1 U Ifs U 11~ U E N Z U Q f E W U Z U Q Z U Q U U Q Z U Q Z U ` 0` o J ¢ f ~ o. o Q O ~ J ¢ ~ o J a ~ J M a ~ J a ~ N Z N ~ J N Z N Z N Z N Z o a o 0 0 0 o .. o o .» o .. o .-. o .. o .. 7 ao 0 ~ ¢ co 0 o o or r- o o r- ¢ ao o r ¢ o0 ~- o a ao o r a U7 W N W ~ W W W N C M N K U O _ M 7 O 00 O CC U ~O K U ~!1 aL' 00 U M M OC U O 00 W 00 O Z P W U W ~ W M W Z O OC O O .-. O OC O OC ~ ~ ~ CC N C Y <0 C L 0) U E C C O E O 01 'D a+ Y C N ~ ~ cn Y C 7 d O Y U O C N O O N N Y O H ~b N N O) m d R ,' ACTION NO. r ~ ITEM NUMBER ^^ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 26, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Legislative Update from the 1996 Session of the General Assembly COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: _o~~ . ~. y~~~1~ ~,,,+~G~v 1S EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Although the General Assembly completed its session on March 11, 1996, the legislative process is not yet complete. The Governor has 30 days from the date of adjournment to act on the bills presented to him. The veto session of the General Assembly is scheduled for April 17, 1996. Until this process is finished any report is incomplete. Thus far, the budget amendments are generally favorable to local government programs. The County Attorney and an Assistant County Administrator made numerous trips to Richmond during the session to address the following legislative issues: BPOL, Urban Partnership, transportation district, budget issues (funding for Explore, education, Comprehensive Services Act, 599/law enforcement), Freedom of Information Act, reversion of cities to towns and annexation moratorium, worker's compensation, water and sewer connection fees, and zoning. Many of these issues have been deferred until the 1997 session. Several study committees will be considering some of these issues during the summer of 1996. BPOL TAX On Tuesday, February 13, 1996, the House and Senate passed the Brickley BPOL legislation and forwarded it to the Governor for his signature. If signed, the effective date will be January 1, 1997. Threshold provisions have been included that will affect individual localities differently depending on total population and actual receipts of particular businesses located within that locality. The thresholds identified are as follows: 1 ,' Population Business Receipts Maximum Fee Allowed Threshold ~--- 0 to 25,000 NA NA 25,001 to 50,000 $50,000 or less $50 50,001 or greater $100,000 or less $100 The proposed legislation will not affect localities with populations of 25,000 or less. Roanoke County falls into the last category, due to a population of approximately 81,500. This means that businesses in our locality with gross receipts equal to or less than $100,000 are exempt from paying BPOL taxes. Also, we have the option of imposing up to a $100 license fee, not only on the businesses that are exempt under the threshold, but also on all other businesses as well. However, the $100 fee must be rolled back to $50 by January 1, 2000. Fiscal Impact - Roanoke County (based on 1995 filings and assessments) FY1994-95 BPOL revenues totaled $3,159,000. The County has approximately 4,800 business license accounts. 4,029 of these accounts report gross receipts of $100,000 or less. Total Projected Revenue Loss from proposed legislation $ (458, 000) ti n Additional Net County Gain Revenue Loss Not Imposing License Fee $0 $(458,000) $50 fee only on exempt $201,450 $(256,550) businesses $50 fee on all $240,000 businesses $100 fee only on exempt $402,900 businesses $100 fee on all $480,000 businesses $ (218, 000) $ (55, 100) $22,000 2 The optional license fees referred to above are "not to exceed" y.°°{ amounts; therefore, any amount below this $100 ceiling could be imposed, at the Board's discretion. COMPREHENSIVE SERVICES ACT Several items in the Governor's proposed budget were revised by the General Assembly to allow current provisions to remain in effect. The proposed increase of the cap on the local share of funding to 80o from the current cap of 45% was eliminated for the next two years. Roanoke County's percentage is currently 43.50. The pool of monies for the State's share of the cost was increased by $6 million to assist in funding mandated services. Roanoke County's program uses approximately $543,000 per year to handle cases which originate from the schools, court service unit, social services and other community programs. The trust fund program had $2.1 million state funding restored. Roanoke County participates in a pilot program under this funding to provide in-home services to County families with a budget of $106,480 for the current fiscal year. 599 FUNDING FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT This funding source provides the state share for police departments of towns, cities and the counties with police departments. The funding level by the state has been flat for several years and the application of updated information to the formula had not been used because of the loss of revenue to several large localities. The governor's proposal would have applied the updated crime and population data without increasing the pool of monies to hold localities harmless. The final action of the General Assembly retained the same funding level and no application of updated data resulting in no fiscal impact to the localities. Roanoke County receives $597,550 from this source. JWENILE JUSTICE The Virginia Juvenile Community Crime Control Act was funded for the biennium. Roanoke County's monies are used to provide the state share of funding for Youth Haven II at $238,000 annually. The allocation is generally based upon juvenile arrests for the uniform crime reporting system. However, Roanoke County is protected under a "hold harmless" provision because of our program. Language was also clarified for "maintenance of effort" 3 which could have reduced the level of funding received from the ~~~ state. No adverse impact is anticipated. Commonwealth's Attorney As part of the Juvenile Justice Reform Act, additional positions are being considered for the Commonwealth's Attorney offices across the state. Roanoke County anticipates increased funding for one position currently being paid 100% by the County as a result of this legislation. Other clerical support may be required as a result of this legislation. FUNDING FOR EDUCATION There was good news from the state in regards to direct aid for education. Roanoke County Schools will receive approximately $2 million increased funding in FY96-97 over FY95-96. This increase includes funding for 1.750 teacher raises effective 12/1/96. These funds total $224,000 and will cover roughly half the teachers of the school system. Other components of the increase include maintenance incentive funds of $92,000, composite index transition funds of $98,000, disparity funds of $31,000, and standards of learning staff development funds of $23,000. URBAN PARTNERSHIP Several bills were adopted by the General Assembly to implement some of the recommendations of the Urban Partnership. The proposal to shift $10 Million from the Governor's economic opportunity fund to pay for Urban Partnership initiatives was defeated. $3 Million has been recommended in FY98 to fund regional incentives and the Governor has been authorized to transfer up to $5 Million in the economic opportunity fund to pay for economic development projects which meet the objectives of this legislation. Economic growth sharing agreements were addressed by the General Assembly. Any revenue, tax base or economic growth sharing agreement that creates debt still requires a special referendum, and all such agreements must be submitted to the Commission on Local Government for review. Don Myers and Supervisor Eddy plan to attend the Urban Partnership meeting on March 22 and may have additional information after that date. 4 MORATORIUM ON STATE REIMBURSEMENT FOR JAIL CONSTRUCTION ~"'~ As of January 1, 1996 there will be a moratorium on state capital and operating funds for new jail construction, renovation or expansion, that have not already been approved by the Board of Corrections, unless the Board grants an exception. We have been notified that the Roanoke County Jail expansion would NOT be affected by this moratorium because it has already been approved by the Board of Corrections. During the 1995-96 session, the State designated $387,500 for the State's contribution toward the Roanoke County jail construction. SOCIAL SERVICES ISSUES Implementation of the state's ADAPT computer system has been placed on hold because it failed to meet expectations in the pilot localities. The state has asked the state department of social services to evaluate the future viability of this program and/or recommend other ways to achieve an efficient, effective automated system for eligibility programs. The report is due July 1996 and the implementation plans report is due December, 1996. The governor's proposed budget was also amended to restore $2.1 million for general relief programs and $2.2 million for special needs adoptions. TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT Senator Edwards was able to include the Roanoke Valley in a study of funding for public transportation and transportation districts. His proposed legislation authorizing a 2% motor vehicle fuel sales tax was carried over to 1997. FREEDOM OF INFORMATION Our efforts were successful in adoption of legislation exempting from disclosure under the Act records of law enforcement agencies containing tactical plans, engineering plans, architectural drawings or operational specifications of courthouses, jails and detention facilities. The bill to require minutes to be taken in executive session was carried over. Legislation was adopted requiring the state government to compile and annually update an index of computer databases maintained or created by it. It is anticipated that this legislation, if signed by the Governor, will be amended next year to include 5 ' local government. The local administrative costs to comply with ~~~ this requirement will be significant. REVERSION AND ANNEXATION Roanoke County supported the efforts of Albemarle County in seeking certain amendments to the reversion of cities to towns provisions in State Code. These amendments prevent any reverting city to return to independent city status without the prior agreement of the affected county; and provide for a "cooling off" period by preventing any reverted town from annexing within two years of becoming a town. The annexation moratorium has been extended to July 1, 2000. The moratorium also prevents the issuance of any new city charters, thus blocking Roanoke County's intentions to pursue city status. WATER AND SEWER CONNECTION FEES Legislation was introduced at the request of the Homebuilders Association of Virginia which would limit the ability of local governments and water and sewer authorities to recover these costs, and which would result in shifting these costs to the water and sewer rate payers. A coalition of local governments (including Roanoke County), authorities and bond and municipal finance experts opposed this legislation, and the bill was carried over to the 1997 session. OTHER LEGISLATIVE ITEMS Health Department Appropriated $118,000 to assist the local share of the Workforce Transition Act cost (early retirements). CHIP Appropriated $700,612 for each fiscal year of the biennium for CHIP programs across the state. STUDIES AUTHORIZED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY Tangible Personal Property Studx The House Rules Committee submitted a resolution calling for a joint subcommittee study of the feasibility of reducing or eliminating the tangible personal property tax (SJR 11-Colgan). 6 V This resolution was killed in the House of Delegates on a 48-48 ~~~ vote. However, in the closing days of the Session, the Senate passed SR 17, which calls for a study of the tangible personal property tax by the Senate Finance Committee, instead of by a joint subcommittee. The resolution was passed by the Senate, and because it was not a joint resolution, it did not have to be passed by the House. Workers' Compensation Heart/Lung Presumptive Subcommittee A subcommittee has been formed to consider the local government's claim that the judicial interpretation of the heart/lung/cancer presumption is inconsistent with Virginia statute. Currently, the employer is overruled in the matter of withholding Workers' Compensation benefits, even when there is overwhelming evidence that personal lifestyle factors (such as smoking and overweight) contributed to the debilitating condition. The subcommittee will meet in the summer of 1996 and report its findings to the Commerce & Labor Committee during the 1997 session. Many significant issues have been deferred until the 1997 session. It is apparent that one cannot effectively monitor the actions of the General Assembly via long distance. The Board may want to consider a full time presence in Richmond during the next legislative session. Although expensive, many other local governments have recognized the need to dedicate staff resources or retain a lobbyist to represent their interests before the General Assembly. Staff will be available to discuss these matters at the Board meeting. John M. Chambliss, Jr. Approved by, Diane H. Hyatt ~~~~ Paul M. Mahoney Brent Robertson Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ----------------------------------------------------------------- Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Harrison Johnson Minnix Nickens 7 cc: Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Diane Hyatt, Finance Director Brent Robertson, Budget Manager r . r ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 26, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Budget Work Session on the Upcoming Annual Budget for FY 1996-97. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S OMMENTS• / wou/d /ike to schedu/e a Saturday work session with the Board of Supervisors ear/y in Apri/ so we can discuss both the schoo/and County budgets. This show/d be a time when we Bna/ize the budget together. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION• This time has been set aside for a budget work session to discuss several items concerning the FY 1996-97 budget. The agenda for this session includes items originally scheduled for the March 12, 1996 Board of Supervisors meeting that were not covered due to time constraints. Topics that are planned for discussion are as follows: • Capital Improvements Program -Detail of additional projects, including Utility projects • Review Budget Calendar -Significant tasks to be completed -Planned/special work sessions • Revenues-state budget impact on local revenue • Other Related Issues A calendar is attached that indicates important elements of the budget process that remain to be completed. These tasks and dates are for planning purposes and can be rearranged as the situation dictates. There is a great deal of material to cover in a limited time frame; therefore, staff would like the Board to consider scheduling a special work session dedicated to budget issues. This could be accomplished on a Saturday or on a Tuesday when there is not a scheduled Board meeting. At this time, April 13 (Sat.) is the only date that may be inconvenient due to spring break, and many participants may be unable to attend. `~ 4 Respectfully submitted, ~~~- ~ Brent Robertson Budget Manager Appro ed by, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved () Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied () Eddy _ _ _ Received () Harrison _ _ _ Referred O Johnson _ _ _ To () Minnix _ _ _ Nickens ~ . . , ~- Roanoke County Work Session and Public Hearing Calendar ~- FY1996-97 BOS 1Vleeting advertisement Date Work Session Public Hearing deadline 2/27/96 Revenue/Expenditure Update c%General Citizen CIP Format Comment 2/16/96 Debt Policy -Vehicle Inventory Rollover Discussion 3/12/96 CIP-Specific Project Discussion 3/26/96 CIP-Utility and General Fund c~Tax Rates 3/15/96 ~BPOL Filing Fee Intentions c%101%-Reassess 3/15/96 Budget Calendar Review 4/1/96 -School Board Present Budget To BOS 4/9/96 Joint with School Board Volunteer Fire and Rescue -CIP Ranking Salary Survey 4/23/96 -Proposed FY96-97 Budget and CIP c%Proposed -Contributions-Cultural, Human Budget and CIP Svc, Tourism Agencies 5/1/96 -Board of Supervisors Adopts School Budget 5/14/96 -Work Session at BOS Pleasure 5/28/96 Adopt FY1996-97 Budget and CIP 6/11/96 -~lst Reading of Appropriation Ordinance 6/25/96 M:budget\planhear.97 2nd Reading of Appropriation Ordinance 4/ 12/96 FACT SHEET Blue Ridge Parkway Interpretive Center ^ Need for an Interpretive Center on the Parkway has been established over the past 10 years for the purposes of interpreting the Blue Ridge Mountains of western Virginia, describing the significance of the water gap, historic migration and settlement routes, assisting Parkway visitors and increasing tourism in the Roanoke Valley. ^ An estimated $2.8 million in tax revenues were generated to Roanoke County in 1994-1995 through meals, lodging and admissions taxes, for an estimated total of $11.9 million in the Roanoke Valley. ^ Five sites were reviewed in Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Roanoke River Parkway. ^ Record of Decision requires change from north of river to Site #5 on Roanoke River Parkway. (Schedule for change received.) ^ Ad hoc regional advisory group, chaired by Dr. Nickens, agree on need, site location, and sent resolutions of support to Congressman Goodlatte. ^ Congressman requests summary of use, estimated cost, and estimated square footage needed for Interpretive Center in preparation for testifying for funds for FY 1996-1997 budget. ^ Any federal funds received for the Center would require a 50/50 match. ^ Total estimate for Interpretive Center is $4.1 million, $.6 million is being requested in FY 97 federal budget. ^ Roanoke County is requesting $200,000 in the CIP for each of the next five years to assist in matching federal funds. ^ Roanoke County is applying for a planning grant through the Community Development Block Grant program ($25,000), which if granted could make the project eligible for construction funds the following year. ^ Other possible sources of matching funds include requesting other localities and organizations for assistance, if federal funds are appropriated. DEPARTMENT: PROJECT TITLE: Economic Development Blue Ridge Parkway Interpretative Center Prior Approved Estimated Expenditures by Fiscal Year Estimated Funding 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000.01 Total Costs $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,000,000 Operating Cost $20,000 DESCRIPTION Development of a regional public partnership for the planning of a phased development of an Interpretative Center, aimed at serving the traveler on the Blue Ridge Parkway at a location on the Roanoke River Parkway. This includes $1,000,000 for planning and construction of the Center, including conceptual drawings, architectural and engineering plans, construction, contingent upon federal funding for the project. JUSTIFICATION Economic Development/Tourism opportunity for a partnership of locaUstate/federal governments to create an Interpretative Center that will assist visitors traveling the Blue Ridge Parkway through the Roanoke Valley region. The Interpretative Center will interpret the Blue Ridge Mountains of western Virginia and the region, providing displays that describe the significance of the natural water gap, historic migration and settlement routes, and the history of the area as a transportation hub, including the role of railroads. It will also assist travelers in finding food, lodging, attractions, and directions to other points along the Blue Ridge Parkway. (See attached summary for more detail.) FUNDING SOURCES Recommended funding sources would be through a partnership arrangement of general operating revenue, state grants, and federal assistance. Other localities will be requested to assist in funding. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT The anticipated first year of operation could be 1998-99. Operating budget is based on utility costs and some programming costs (see attached square footage summary). Operating costs are anticipated to become the responsibilities of the Roanoke Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Comprehensive plan needs to be amended to recognize project need on the Blue Ridge Parkway and to allow for phase one of this project. {~ Virginia Blue Ridge Parkway Interpretive Center, Roanoke River Gorge 15,900 sq.ft. building 3-4,000 visitors a day or over 500,000 visitors/year (Open seasonally) Includes: information desk, auditorium, exhibits, museum, interactive computers, viewing & sitting areas, book/gift sales area, restrooms, and parking. The Center will be designed to ecologically blend in with the area. Timbers from the region will be chosen for the building, with river stone for accent. The center's design will direct visitors to vistas of the scenic mountains. Of first importance is to introduce visitors to the Blue Ridge Parkway, its development and history. Everything else, i.e. exhibits and themes, are based on that. Introduction areas will be designed to disperse people, viewing and sitting areas, hiking areas, exhibitry, displays, etc. Interpretive displays will describe the significance of the natural water gap, historic migration and settlement routes, and the history of the area as a transportation hub, including the role of raikoads. General themes of the center will include: geography, botany, history, culture, etc. It is important to tell the Blue Ridge Parkway story from the region's perspective, using quotes and donated materials throughout the exhibits. Resources will come from the area and the National Park Service archives. The museum is part of the Interpretive Center. The auditorium will be designed and built for the best visual introduction to the Blue Ridge Parkway and the National Park Service and to provide a sense of what makes it unique and why Congress set it aside. The auditorium would hold 100 sitting, 150 standing, and be handicap accessible. The visual presentation of the history of the Blue Ridge Parkway and National Park Service would include wrap around visuals and would be shown hourly in the summer, on demand in winter. Estimated Budget: A. Planning/Preliminary Design. $100,000 B. Infrastructure: electricity, water and sewer, site preparation. 500,000 C. Parking for a minimum of 100 cars, 7 buses and 7 recreation vehicles along with adjacent walks and landscaping. 500,000 D. $3,000,000 is needed for the A&E design and construction for the visitor facility. The design will be in accordance with Blue Ridge Parkway Design Standard Criteria with designers who have Parkway project experience. Its maximum size will be 15,900 sq.ft. At the approximate cost of $200/sq.ft. 0 0 Total 4 1 00 ~ r~ 2 Functional Spaces: Sq. Ft. A. Visitor Services 1. Auditorium, seating 100 2,550 2. Projection Room 200 3. Lobby/Information Desk Area/Exhibits 4,000 4. Book Sales Area 1,000 5. Book Storage 200 6. Public Restrooms 1,500 7. Interactive Media Kiosk 1,000 8. Facility Interpreters Space 1 250 Subtotal 11,700 B. Support Services 1. Artifact Preservation 1,000 2. Mechanical Room 300 3. Circulation/Corridors 100 4. Entry Vestibule 250 5. Janitor Closet 100 Subtotal 1,750 C. Administrative Services 1. Facility Manager's Office 200 2. Volunteer Coordinator's Office 150 3. District Ranger's Office 200 4. Conference Room 200 5. Secretary/Receptionist Area 200 6. Storage Room 250 7. Employee/Volunteer Restroom. 100 8. Employee/Volunteer Breakroom 200 9. Circulation/Corridor 200 10. Meeting/Training Room, seating 50 750 Subtotal 2,450 Total Facility 15.900 r' MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Chairman, Members of the Board FROM: Brent Robertson ~^ DATE: Ma-nch 26, 1996 SUBJECT: Results of the CIP Prioritization Process Attached you will find the results of the CIP Prioritization process. Seven of the ten voting members returned project evaluations. Average scores were computed and each project was assigned a "rank" based on this score. The attached results represent a relatively objective prioritization of the 67 CIP projects. This list is not the definitive prioritization, but rather a reference for discussion of the various projects. Staff will continue to work with the Board and the County Administrator to identify the needs of various departments as they relate to the CIP. Through this process we hope to compile a more accurate portrait of the capital priorities for the County. As always, your comments are appreciated as we work to improve the capital planning process for the County. Roanoke County Prioritized CIP Projects FY 1997-2001 . - 1 .- Re Tonal Stormwater Mana ement/Drainage ..- 30.7 2 Coun -Wide Road Improvement 27.1 3 Under round Fuel Storage Tanks 26.9 4 800 MHz Radio S stem U rade 26.0 5 Hangin Rock Public Safe Buildin 22.9 6 Blue Rid a Parkwa Visitor Orientation/Interpretation Center 22.6 7 Land Acquisition/District Park 21.9 8 Hollins Joint Industrial Park 21.9 9 Residential Automated Curbside Recyclin 21.3 10 Bunk Room Additions- -Catawba , Mt. Pleasant,Mason Cove 21.1 11 Emer enc Communications E ui ment U rade 20.4 12 Geo raphic Information S stem-Phase II 20.4 13 Coun -wide Greenwa s 20.3 14 Geo raphic Information S stem-Phase I 20.1 15 I-81 Industrial Site 19.3 16 Burton Athletic Com lex 18.9 17 Fire Hydrant Installation ---- 18.9.' '' 18 Mobile Data S stem 18.9'' 19 Green Hill Park Phase III 18.7 20 Camp Roanoke Development, Phase l - 18.6 21 New Mount Pleasant Public Safe ' Building 1'8.3' 22 Garst Mill Park _ 18.1 ~~ 23 Access Pari & Automated Su port S stem 16.6° 24 Brambleton Center 16.1' 25 __ Renovation of Roanoke County-Salem Jail 16.1 26 Walrond Park Phase III _._ _ 16'-0 27 ____ Nei hborhood Incentive Fund -Hollins '' 15.9" _ 28 Voting Machines 15.7 29 _ Vinyard park Phase Ill _ 15.6'- 30 _ Glenvar Branch Expansion and Renovation _-- 15.6 31 Merriman Soccer Complex __ _ 15.0 32 _ Courthouse Entrance Renovation for Security _ 15.0 33 Public Road Improvement Fund__ 14.7 _ 34 Signal Light Installation Fund - __-__ 14.6 35 __ Freeloader Service Upgrade and Expansi n o 14.6 36 _ _ Hollins Road Public Safety Building - -._._ _ _ 14.3 37 --- Expansion of File Storage Area - _ _ _ 14.1 38 Off -Site Drainage Fund __ - _ _ 13.9 _ _ 39 Vinton Library Parking Lot Expansion/Building Renovation 13.9 40 ---- _ Whispering Pines Phase III _ _ ---- - 13.9 . 42 _ _ _ __ NewrHeadquartersaLibraryeS _ _ -- _ 13.41 43 North Roanoke Communi Recr ation Center e 13,3 44 __ _ Picnic Shelters _ 13.1 45 Renovations/Improvements: Parking Areas 13.1 M:\F I NAN C E\ci p\F I N RAN K. W K4 4 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER -- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 26, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Policy to allow departments to retain a portion of their unspent budget at year end. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: I appreciate your support of this incentive. The more a department is allowed to keep, the greater the incentive will be. As part of the budget process each year, I review those departments that have unusually large unexpended funds and I consider that when I recommend the future year's budget. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Departmental operating budgets are annually approved by the Board of Supervisors at a level that will ensure a standard level of service delivery to the citizens of Roanoke County. At times departments will complete their fiscal year with actual expenditures less than budget appropriations by employing frugal and innovative management practices. The Board has agreed to adopt a policy that will provide incentives for reducing annual expenditures below appropriations. These incentives will allow departments to invest in resources or innovative methods to maintain or improve the quality of service provided such as enhancing public information efforts, small capital replacement, or skills training. Based on discussions with the Board on February 27, 1996, staff has drafted a policy and resolution to formalize this process. At that time there was general agreement for allowing departments to keep 60% of their savings and return 40%. These funds are to be used for non-recurring items and will be reviewed by the County Administrator. The policy and resolution is attached for your review. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the attached policy and resolution concerning the use of unspent expenditure appropriations at year end. S ~ Respectfully submitted, Brent Robertson Budget Manager q-i.~ Approved by, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Approved Denied Received Referred To ACTION () Motion by: () () () () VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy - - - Hamson _ _ _ Johnson _ _ _ Minnix _ _ _ Nickens i, - (,~ _ f , AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 26, 1996 RESOLIITION ESTABLISHING A POLICY FOR THE USE OF UNE%PENDED APPROPRIATIONS AT THE END OF EAC$ FISCAL YEAR WHEREAS, as a result of frugal management practices at both the departmental and administrative levels of County government, various County departments have completed the fiscal year with actual expenditures being less than budget appropriations; and, WHEREAS, any unexpended appropriation at the end of a fiscal year reverts to the general fund (or the fund in which the appropriation originated) for reappropriation in the following year, except for outstanding encumbrances and appropriations designated for capital projects; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors intends to adopt a policy to provide incentives to reduce annual expenditures below appropriations and to reward departments for cost containment and efficiency measures while maintaining the high quality delivery of public services. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the following policy for the use of unexpended appropriations at the end of each fiscal year is hereby adopted: County of Roanoke Policy for Use of Unspent Expenditure Appropriations at Year End I. Background At the end of a fiscal year, unspent expenditure appropriations generally lapse and revert to a reserve or fund r (1/' „+ ~ f balance within the fund in which the appropriations? originated. In some cases it is desirable to reappropriate a portion of these funds to allow for the completion of previously stated objectives. The County provides for these instances by including wording in the Appropriation Ordinance that encompasses encumbrances, capital projects and school funds. II. Purpose This policy would establish guidelines to reward departments for cost containment and efficiency measures that do not adversely affect the delivery of quality services. Rewarding frugal management practices will provide a more flexible environment and allow innovative and efficient approaches to quality delivery of services. III. Performance Standard Departments will not engage in practices, for the purpose of solely generating savings, that will adversely affect the quality of service delivery, unless approved by the County Administrator and/or the Board of Supervisors. IV. Policy Guidelines A. When the County's accounts are closed out at the fiscal year-end, 60% of the unencumbered expenditure savings from departmental budgets of the General Fund shall be designated for reappropriation in the following fiscal year. The remaining 40% of the unencumbered expenditure savings shall revert to the Undesignated Fund Balance. • ~ ~ `~ ~ 1 B. Departmental requests for this reappropriation of funds will be evaluated and approved by the County Administrator on an item-by-item basis. C. These funds shall be deemed "non-recurring"; therefore, the use of these funds can only be used for capital outlay, training or other purposes that do not require expenditures in future fiscal years. 2. That this Policy shall be in effect for FY 1995-96, and subsequent fiscal years unless otherwise amended by the Board of Supervisors. G;\ attorney\ pmm\ approp. pol s AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON MARCH 26, 1996 RESOLIITION 032696-6 CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the Certification Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Executive Session ~. - ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 26, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Public Hearing for Citizen Comment on the Real Estate Tax Rate and the "Effective" Real Estate Tax Rate Increase. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: As directed by the Board of Supervisors at the February 27, 1996 Board meeting, staff advertised the proposed Real Estate Tax Rate and the "Effective" Real Estate Tax Rate Increase for the calendar year 1996 as follows: Real Estate Tax at a rate of not more than $1.13 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation. The public hearing scheduled for today is for the express purpose of receiving written and oral citizen comment on the proposed Real Estate Tax Rate and the "Effective" Real Estate Tax Rate Increase for the 1996 calendar year. The proposed Real Estate Tax Rate of $1.13 and the "Effective" Real Estate Tax Rate Increase was advertised on March 19, 1996; thereby satisfying state code requirements for public notice. Respectfully submitted, W. Brent Robertson Budget Manager Approved by, ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ,r` ACTION VOTE Approved () Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied () Eddy _ _ Received () Harrison _ _ Referred () Johnson To () Minnix _ _ _ Nickens u-e.~, ~. AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 26, 1996 ORDER 032696-7 SETTING THE TA% RATE ON REAL ESTATE SITUATE IN ROANORE COUNTY FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1996 BE IT ORDERED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the levy for the twelve-month period beginning January 1, 1996, and ending December 31, 1996, be, and hereby is, ................... set for a tax rate of : ~~''?''''< ~' ~° per one hundred dollars of assessed ................... ................... valuation on all taxable real estate and mobile homes classified by §§ 58.1-3200, 58.1-3201, and 58.1-3506.B of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, situate in Roanoke County. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the order, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: .~ C~v Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Brent Robertson, Budget Manager John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue > ~ ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~.-- ~ + Y~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 26, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Adoption of the Real Estate Tax Rate for the Calendar Year 1996. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~(, r 3 SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Real Estate Tax Rate for the twelve-month period beginning January 1, 1996, and ending December 31, 1996, was advertised on March 19, 1996 at $1.13 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation. The public hearing for citizen comment on the above advertised tax rate is being held on March 26, 1996. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The proposed budget for fiscal year 1996-97 is predicated on the current Real Estate Tax Rate; therefore, staff recommends that the Real Estate Tax Rate again be established at the rate of $1.13 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for the 1996 calendar year. Respectfully submitted, Vv' W . Brent Robertson Budget Manager VOTE Approved () Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied () Eddy _ _ Received () Harrison _ Referred () Johnson _ _ To O Minnix _ _ Nickens Approved by, ~~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION ,~ L - - (~-~,b AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 26, 1996 ORDER SETTING THE TAX RATE ON REAL ESTATE SITUATE IN ROANOKE COUNTY FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1996 BE IT ORDERED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the levy for the twelve-month period beginning January 1, 1996, and ending December 31, 1996, be, and hereby is, ................... set for a tax rate of ~~ per one hundred dollars of assessed valuation on all taxable real estate and mobile homes classified by §§ 58.1-3200, 58.1-3201, and 58.1-3506.B of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, situate in Roanoke County. c:\wp51\egenda\genera]\taxrete.re ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER u _ ~ • G AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 26, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Public Hearing for Citizen Comment on the Personal Property and Machinery and Tools Tax Rates. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: As directed by the Board of Supervisors at the February 27, 1996 Board meeting, staff advertised the proposed Personal Property and Machinery and Tools Tax rates for the calendar year 1996 as follows: Personal Property Tax at a rate of not more than $3.50 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation. Machinery and Tools Tax at a rate of not more than $3.00 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation. The public hearing scheduled for today is for the express purpose of receiving written and oral citizen comment on the proposed Personal Property and Machinery and Tools Tax rates for the 1996 calendar year. The proposed Personal Property and Machinery and Tools Tax rates were advertised on March 19, 1996; thereby satisfying state code requirements for public notice. ~~ ~,~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, $ELD THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 26, 1996 ORDER 032696-8 SETTING THE TAB LEVY ON ALL CLASSES OF PERSONAL PROPERTY SITUATE IN ROANORE COUNTY FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1996 BE IT ORDERED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the levy for the twelve-month period beginning January 1, 1996, and ending December 31, 1996, be, and hereby is, ................... set for a tax rate of ~~ Per one hundred dollars of assessed ................... ................... 1 valuation on all taxable, tangible personal property, excluding all those classes of household goods and personal effects as are defined in §§ 58.1-3504 and 58.1-3505 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, but including the property separately classified by §§ 58.1-3500, 58.1-3501, 58.1-3502, 58.1-3506 in the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, of public service corporations based upon the assessed value thereof fixed by the State Corporation Commission and duly certified. 2. That there be, and hereby is, established as a separate class of personal property in Roanoke County those items of personal property set forth in § 58.1-3506 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and adopted by Ordinance No. 121592-11, and generally designated as Motor Vehicles for Disabled Veterans. 3. That the levy for the twelve-month period beginning January 1, 1996, and ending December 31, 1996, be, and hereby is, set at fifty (50~) percent of the tax rate established in paragraph 1 for the taxable, tangible personal property as herein established as a separate classification for tax purposes and as more fully ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~ - I ~ d( AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 26, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Adoption of the Personal Property and Machinery and Tools Tax Rates for the Calendar Year 1996. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~K,~,,.r~-~C ~~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Personal Property Tax Rate for the twelve-month period beginning January 1, 1996, and ending December 31, 1996, was advertised on March 19, 1996 at $3.50 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation. The Machinery and Tools Tax Rate was also advertised on the above date at $3.00 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation. The public hearing for citizen comment on the above advertised tax rates is being held on March 26, 1996. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The proposed budget for fiscal year 1996-97 is predicated on the current Personal Property and Machinery and Tools Tax Rates; therefore, staff recommends that the Personal Property Tax Rate again be established at the rate of $3.50 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation and the Machinery and Tools Tax Rate at $3.00 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for the 1996 calendar year. Respectfully submitted, ~L~ -~ W. Brent Robe tson Budget Manager Approv by, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ~ ~ R (,l.-I,~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 26, 1996 ORDER SETTING THE TAX LEVY ON ALL CLASSES OF PERSONAL PROPERTY SITUATE IN ROANOKE COUNTY FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1996 BE IT ORDERED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the levy for the twelve-month period beginning January 1, 1996, and ending December 31, 1996, be, and hereby is, set for a tax rate of per one hundred dollars of assessed valuation on all taxable, tangible personal property, excluding all those classes of household goods and personal effects as are defined in §§ 58.1-3504 and 58.1-3505 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, but including the property separately classified by §§ 58.1-3500, 58.1-3501, 58.1-3502, 58.1-3506 in the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, of public service corporations based upon the assessed value thereof fixed by the State Corporation Commission and duly certified. 2. That there be, and hereby is, established as a separate class of personal property in Roanoke County those items of personal property set forth in § 58.1-3506 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and adopted by Ordinance No. 121592-11, and generally designated as Motor Vehicles for Disabled Veterans. 3. That the levy for the twelve-month period beginning January 1, 1996, and ending December 31, 1996, be, and hereby is, set at fifty (50~) percent of the tax rate established in paragraph 1 for the taxable, tangible personal property as herein established as a separate classification for tax purposes and as more fully J 1 u-i,~P defined by § 58.1-3506 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and generally designated as Motor Vehicles for Disabled Veterans. 4. That there be, and hereby is, established as a separate class of personal property in Roanoke County those items of personal property set forth in § 58.1-3507 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and generally designated as machinery and tools. 5. That the levy for the twelve-month period beginning January 1, 1996, and ending December 31, 1996, be, and hereby is, ................... set for a tax rate of ~~ per one hundred dollars of assessed valuation on all taxable, tangible personal property as herein established as a separate classification for tax purposes and as more fully defined by § 58.1-3507 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and generally designated as machinery and tools. c:\Mp51\agenda\genere]\taxrate.pp . ~-i t'' REVISED 2/5/97 TO CORRCT TAX MAP NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MARCH 26, 1996 ORDINANCE Q32696-9 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION pF APPROXIMATELY 302 ACRES OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED ON COTTON HILL ROAD, NORTH AND SOUTH OF THE BLUE RIDGE PARRNAY (SOUTH SIDE OF PARKWAY - TAX MAP NOS. 96.02-1-1, 96.02-1-2, 97.03-2-5, THE SOUTHERLY PORTION OF 97.01-2-17, THE SOUTHERLY PORTION OF 96.02-1- 46; NORTH SIDE OF PARKWAY - TAX MAP NOS. 96.07-1-6, THE NORTHERLY PORTION OF 96.02-1- 46) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1, AG-1, AND AR TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF PRD WITH CONDITIONS IIPON THE APPLICATION OF BOONE, BOONE & LOEB, INC. WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 27, 1996, and the second reading and public hearing were held March 26, 1996. WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 5, 1996; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing approximately 302 acres and located on Cotton Hill Road, north and south of the Blue Ridge Parkway (South Side of Parkway - Tax Map Nos. 96.02-1-1, 96.02-1-2, 97.03-2-5, the Southerly Portion of 97.01-2-17, the Southerly Portion of 96.02-1- 46; North Side of Parkway - Tax Map Nos. 96.07-1-6, the Northerly Portion of 96.02-1-46) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-1, Low Density 1 Residential District; AG-1, Agricultural/Rural Low Density District; and AR, Agriculture/Residential District to the zoning classification of PRD, Planned Residential Development District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Boone, Boone, & Loeb, Inc. 3. That the owners of the property, Nicholas H. Beasley and Susan Beasley; Boone, Boone & Loeb, Inc.; Palm Land Company, L.C.; and Cotton Hill Land Company, L. C. have voluntarily proffered in writing conditions which are made a part hereof and incorporated herein by reference and which are set out in detail in Exhibit A (filed with the official records for the March 26, 1996 meeting) entitled "A Rezoning Application: Planning and Design Documents for Wilshire. County of Roanoke, Virginia, A Planned Residential Development (PRD). Boone, Boone & Loeb, Inc. Owner & Developer, dated September 1995, updated March 1996" which conditions the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Approximately 302 acres, as more particularly described on pages 2.a. through 2.m. in the above referenced Exhibit A. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect 2 w' r On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance with conditions and alternative #1 amendment to paragraph #5 as suggested by Mr. Mahoney, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: Supervisor Minnix A COPY TESTE: ~• Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MARCH 26, 1996 ORDINANCE 032696-9 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF APPROXIMATELY 302 ACRES OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED ON COTTON HILL ROAD, NORTH AND SOUTH OF THE BLUE RIDGE. PARKWAY (SOUTH SIDE OF PARKWAY - TAX MAP NOB. 96.02-1-1, 96.02-1-2, 97.03-2-5, THE SOUTHERLY PORTION OF ~~ 97.01-2-17, THE SOUTHERLY PORTION OF 96.04-1- 7 G~~ a-~~" 46; NORTH SIDE OF PARKWAY - TA% MAP NOB. 7 96.07-1-6, THE NORTHERLY PORTION OF 96.02-1- 46) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1, AG-1, AND AR TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF PRD WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF BOONE, BOONE & LOEB, INC. WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 27, 1996, and the second reading and public hearing were held March 26, 1996. WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 5, 1996; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing approximately 302 acres and located on Cotton Hill Road, north and south of the Blue Ridge Parkway (South Side of Parkway - Tax Map Nos. 96.02-1-1, 96.02-1-2, 97.03-2-5, the C14~•''y Southerly Portion of 97.01-2-17, the Southerly Portion of 96.04-1- 46; North Side of Parkway - Tax Map Nos. 96.07-1-6, the Northerly Portion of 96.02-1-46) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-1, Low Density 1 ~rrrrrrrrrrrrrliriniririiunlrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111w, ~ f c AGENDA ITEM NO. APPE CE RE VEST _ Q _ _ = _ = X PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CIZTZENS COMII~NTS _ = .. .. _ _ SUBJECT: ~~ C~ c~7,iy' ~ 4~a~'_ c- ~ ~ c 'r - __ - - - - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED s __ BELOW: - - c ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, = and will enforce the rule unless inst t d b th fg ruc e y e majority o the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentatio^ of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c • ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. c =_ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. - ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments _ with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEA1. _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK ~ i = ~ _ ~ s ~ ~ ~ 1 ~} N) ~ ~ ~z. (~ tr ~ n~ NAME ~ ~ _ ADDRESS ~~?~ ~ '-j ~'~`_ 5-~-- ~z_ 1 ~dAN~~K~ ~=1 j-y ~ ~ = PHONE ~`f~~ ~~ ~ s - mllllllllillltillllllllllltiflilllllilliilllllllliltllilllllililllillllllllillllilllliilililtfilllltilllllil[iitiiiiiiiiiiiii ii~ ~, AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TIIESDAY, MARCH 26, 1996 ORDINANCE 032696-9 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF APPROXIMATELY 302 ACRES OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED ON COTTON HILL ROAD, NORTH AND SOUT$ OF THE BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY (SOIITH SIDE OF PARKWAY - TAX MAP NOS. 96.02-1-1, 96.02-1-2, 97.03-2-5, THE SOUTHERLY PORTION OF 97.01-2-17, THE SOUTHERLY PORTION OF 96.04-1- 46; NORTH SIDE OF PARKWAY - TA% MAP NOB. 96.07-1-6, THE NORTHERLY PORTION OF 96.02-1- 46) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1, AG-1, AND AR TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF PRD WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF BOONE, BOONE & LOEB, INC. WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 27, 1996, and the second reading and public hearing were held March 26, 1996. WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 5, 1996; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing approximately 302 acres and located on Cotton Hill Road, north and south of the Blue Ridge Parkway (South Side of Parkway - Tax Map Nos. 96.02-1-1, 96.02-1-2, 97.03-2-5, the ~` ~-''~I Southerly Portion of 97.01-2-17, the Southerly Portion of 96.04-1- 46; North Side of Parkway - Tax Map Nos. 96.07-1-6, the Northerly Portion of 96.02-1-46) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-1, Low Density 1 WILSHIRE REZONING March 26,1996 ALTERNATIVE 1 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after approval of right of waX permit for utility extensions across National Park Service ro er All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. t~" ALTERNATIVE 2 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after the date on which the National Park Service grants its full right of wadpermit for utilities necessary to develop the property located on the south side of the Blue Ridge Parkway, right of way permits for water and sewer would be from utilities available on the developers property on the north side of the Blue Ridge Parkway and would travel in an old farm road through an existing concrete culvert under the Parkway to the property on the south side of the Blue Ridge Parkwa~ght of wadpermit for gas lines would be in Cotton Hill Road through the underpass the Parkwaypasses over. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. ACTION NO. `f ITEM NUMBER ~/ "'~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 26, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Petition of Boone, Boone & Loeb, Inc. to rezone 315.+ acres from R-1, AG-1, and AR to PRD, planned resident development, located on Cotton Hill Road. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This proposal is a classic example of how planning should work. There has never been a case in Roanoke County when a more thorough planning process has been conducted. All of the appropriate parties participated including the Blue Ridge Parkway, residents in the communities adjacent to the parkway, county staff and the Planning Commission. Work sessions were also attended by members of the Board of Supervisors. Development is already taking place along the parkway, and in many cases, the development is piecemeal. This will continue in the future. It is far better to go through a process of this type where we can blend the project with the surrounding environment, consider the impact on the neighborhood, and plan long range for public infrastructure needs. I have concerns, as do many others, about the impact of a project as large as this one. This will add considerable traffic on Cotton Hill Road. It will increase demands on our schools and parks, but this will happen even if this proposed rezoning is not approved. The Back Creek area is growing. We have worked hard to insist on a second entrance to the development at a future date. The petitioner has agreed to Mr. Harrington's and Mr. Covey's request to build a limited amount of houses until the second entrance is included. There are also concerns about the commercial district. I hope that this will not be a major stumbling block because as we look ten years into the future, there will be a need for limited businesses throughout the area. If this project fails, existing property owners will suffer. There are already many houses on Cotton Hill Road beyond the parkway that are on individual wells and septic V- ~ systems. That area of the County is not known for stable water supplies and septic tanks. Without approval of this rezoning we are back at "ground zero" with the parkway, trying to get permission to extend water and sewer to those people. It is just a matter of time until these utilities are needed. Why not have the petitioner help pay for the extension of utilities. In conclusion, many individuals are to be commended, beginning with the Board of Supervisors for insisting that the parkway be protected, that proper planning take place, and that we work with the communities in the area. The Planning staff also deserves much of the credit, especially Janet Scheid. Others to be commended include Carlton Abbott, Gary Johnson of the Blue Ridge Parkway and former congressman Jim Olin. The petitioner also deserves our gratitude for his willingness to put together a premier project. If approved, the development must be as good as we have said it would be, and our staff will continually monitor its progress. I ask for your support of this rezoning petition. Submitted by: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Harrison Johnson Minnix Nickens Motion by: v- PETITIONER: BOONE, BOONE ~ LOEB CASE NUMBER: 43-11/95 Planning Commission Hearing Date: March 5, 1996 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: March 26, 1996 A. REQUEST Petition of Boone, Boone & Loeb, Inc. to rezone 315+ acres from R-1, AG-1, and AR to PRD, planned residential development to construct residential homes and commercial services, located on Cotton Hill Road, east and west of the Blue Ridge Parkway, Cave Spring Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS Joanne Derryberry expressed the following concerns: size of the development being proposed; lack of a buffer between this project and adjoining residential property; removal of trees; a significant impact on the rural area; height of the multifamily buildings. James Olin, cochairman of the Coalition for the Blue Ridge Parkway, spoke in support of the proposal and praised the workshop which was created to bring together everyone involved in the project. As a result of the workshop, it is hoped that a more compatible use of the property will occur. Fran Marrano stated that she objects to the commercial aspect of the project. By allowing commercial development, a precedent is in place to allow other commercial uses. She questioned the fiscal impact of the project on the residents of Cotton Hill Road. Ms. Marrano commented that she is pleased that consideration was given to lessen the impact on the parkway. Gene Marrano wanted to know if the impact of the increased traffic coming into this development has been considered. The Commission pointed out that the Fifth Planning District Commission has conducted a very extensive study of the roads in the area. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Commission inquired about buffering requirements and the proposed density of the cluster homes. Staff responded as follows: no buffering is required between residential use types, i.e., cluster homes and single family homes; applicant has proffered a maximum of 6 units per acre. Mr. Witt expressed the following concerns: increased traffic on Cotton Hill Road; only one access into the south side of the property; unknown commercial uses. He noted that the developer has proffered conditions to mitigate the impact on the parkway and limit the commercial uses. The petitioner is proposing innovative housing as well as providing for smaller interior roads. Also this is the second development to include a greenway. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS All submitted material constitute proffered conditions (see attached notebook). ~,i E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Witt moved to recommend approval of the petition with proffered conditions. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Hooker, Robinson, Ross, Witt, Thomason NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: -Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map - Staff Report -Other ,,• ~~ ~ Lli~ t c G ~ '''i1 Terrance Harrington, Secr~ ry Roanoke County Planning Commission EXHIBIT A v.. A REZONING APPLICATION PLANNING AND DESIGN DOCUMENTS FOR WILSHIRE A PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA BOONE, BOONE & LOEB, INC. OWNER & DEVELOPER SEPTEMBER 1995 UPDATED MARCH 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS ~ s ° 1 2 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10 11 12 13 Application cover sheet 1. a. - 1. d. Legal description 2.a. - 2.m. Existing Zoning, Land Use and Ownership 3.a. Existing Zoning Plat with Tax Numbers 4 Statement Objectives S.a. - S.b. PRD Master Development Plan 6.a. - 6.b. Existing Site Conditions 7.a. Land Use DesignationslDevelopment Regulations 8.a. - 8.j. Circulation Plan 9.a. - 9.c. Public Service/LJtilities 10.a. Open Green Space Plan l l.a. - l l.b. Architectural and Community Guidelines 12.a. - 12.h. Development Schedule 13.a. - 13.b. For staff use only ~~ i~ COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SbY P:O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 date received: received by: application fee: PC/BZA date: placards issued: 805 date: Case Number: Check type of application filed (check all that apply): - ~7 REZONING ^ SPECIAL USE ^ VARIANCE Applicant's name: Boone, Boone & Loeb, Inc. Phone: 772-9246 Address: P. O. Box 8156 Zip Code: 24014 Roanoke, VA Owner's name: See Attached Phone: Address: Zip Code: Location of property: Tax Map Number: See Attached Magisterial District: Community Planning Area: Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: See Attached 302+ acres Existing Land Use: sq.ft. Proposed Zoning: PRD ............................ For start use oily Proposed Land Use: Mixed Use Develojxnent use Type: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES _ X NO IF N0, A VARIANCE 1S REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES X NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES X N.0 Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v K' - ws v ws v Consultation 8 1 /2" x 1 1 ' concept plan Application fee Application `Q~ Metes and bounds description ~ Proffers, if applicable Justification <°?~`t Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners /hereby certify that / am either the owner of the properly or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent oI the owner. Owner's Signature: See Attached - - 1.a. Application of Rezoning ~~~ Owner's name and address: (the following are various owners of records as well as contractual owners) Nicholas H. Beasley and Susan Beasley 5949 Coleman Rd., SW Roanoke, VA 24018 703-774-0204 - Boone, Boone & Loeb, Inc. P. O. Box 8156 Roanoke, VA 24014 703-772-3887 Palm Land Company, L.C. P. O. Box 8156 Roanoke, VA 24014 703-772-3887 Cotton Hill Land Company, L.C. P. O. Box 8156 Roanoke, VA 24014 703-772-3887 Location of Property: PRD Property located on the north side of the Blue Ridge Parkway is accessed from Cotton Hill Road onto Monet Drive and begins at the end of "The Gardens of Cotton. Hill" Subdivision but does not include Section 1 of The Groves and Section 2, Ashmont in the Groves. Tax Map Number: 96.07-1-6, the northerly portion of 96.02-01-46 (all of this property that is on the north side of the Blue Ridge Parkway). Magisterial District: Cave Spring Magisterial District PRD Property located on south side of the Blue Ridge Parkway accesses directly off Cotton Hill Road, with a portion of the property fronting on Cotton Hill Road. Tax map numbers are 96.02-01-01, 96.02-01-02, 97.03-02-05, the southerly portion of 97.01-02- 17 (all of this property that is ou the south side of the Blue Ridge Parkway), and the southerly portion of 96.02-01-46 (all of this property that is on the south side of the Blue Ridge Parkway) Magisterial District: Cave Spring Magisterial District Revised 2/29-96 l.b. ~. Existing Zoning• All property located on the north side of the Blue Ridge Parkway, is currently zoned R-1, with conditions, with-the exception of approximately 8 acres which is zoned AG-1 with ~ - conditions. All property located on the south side of the Blue Ridge Parkway, is currently zoned AR with the exception of approximately 12-15 acres, which is zoned AG-1. Existing Land Uses: Property located on the north side of the Blue Ridge Parkway: approximately 13 acres have been subdivided into residential lots and the balance of the land is mostly being used for agricultural purposes. Property located on the south side of the Blue Ridge Parkway: a small portion of the property is currently being used to graze cattle and the balance of it is wooded with no current use. We hereby certify that the following individuals or entities own or have a contractual interest in the property listed in this application and are requesting that it be rezoned as a PRD with the att hed proferred conditions. .~..~ a. Nic las H. Beasley Susan Beasley Boo Loeb, Inc. b ~, P ompany, L.C. Co n and Compla~ny, L.C. b ~' G ,~iV~ 1.c. ROANOKE COUNTY UTILITY DEPARTMENT _ APPLICATION FOR WATER OR SEWER SERVICE ~ .~ TO PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Date: September 1, 1995 Name of Applicant : .Boone, Boone & Loeb, Inc. Phone: 772-3887 Address of Applicant: P.O. Box 8156, Roanoke, VA 24014 Name of Developer: Boone, Boone & Loeb, Inc. Phone: 772-3887 Address of Developer: P. O. Box 8156, Roanoke, VA 24014 Name of Developer: Palm Land Company, L.C. Phone: 772-3887 Address of Developer: P. O. Box 8156, Roanoke, VA 24014 Name of Developer: Cotton Hill Land Company, L.C. Phone: 772-3887 Address of Developer: P. O. Box 8156, Roanoke, VA 24014 Name of Design Engineer: Lumsden Associates Phone: 774-4411 Address of Design Engineer: 4664 Brambleton Ave., S.W., Roanoke, VA 24018 Name of Contact Person: Len Boone Name of Proposed Development: Wilshire Type of Development and proposed number of units: Planned Residential Development (PRD) with up to 1047 residences comprised of single family detached, zero lot line houses, cluster homes (detached and two unit homes), townhouse, apartments and condominiums with 5.5 acres of Community Services. Location of proposed development: Southwest Roanoke County off Monet Drive and Cotton Hill Road Size of proposed development in acres: 302+ Acres Give minimum and maximum elevation (Use USGS Elevations) at which the individual water/sewer service connections would be located: Minimum 1200 feet MSL. Maximum 1590 feet MSL Is this application for a development that ~ be a part section of a larger future development? X No Yes • ! Signature of Applicant Revised 2/29-96 l.d. BOON, BOONE ~ LOEB (WILSHIRE) V Comm: 94-84 Description for Roanoke County tax parcel 96.02=1-46.4 being 52.221 acres of land lying at the easterly terminus of Monet Drive (50' R/W) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District of Roanoke County, Virginia, and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at corner #1, said corner being a point in the southerly right-of-way of Monet Drive and the northeasterly corner of Lot 16, Block 3, Section 1, The Groves as recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Plat Book 17, Page 89; Thence with the line common to the southerly right-of-way of Monet Drive and the herein described property, S 53° 17' 56" E, 87.58 feet to corner #2, said corner being the most southerly point of Monet Drive; Thence with the line common to the right-of-way of Monet Drive and the herein=described property, N 36° 42' 04" E, 50.00 feet to corner #3, said corner being the most easterly point on Monet Drive and a point in the southerly line of Lot 15, Block 2,Section 1, The Groves; Thence with the southerly line of Lot 15, S 53° 17' 56" E, 26.09 feet to corner #4, said corner being a point of curvature on the =~--° southerly line of Lot 15; Thence with a line common to said Lot 15 and the herein described property with a curve to the left whose radius = 452.46 feet, length = 28.51 feet, tangent = 14.26 feet, delta = 03° 36' 39", a chord bearing and distance of S 55 ° 06' 16" E, 28.51 feet to corner #5, said corner being the southerly corner of Lot 15; Thence with a line common to Lot 15 and the herein described property, N 33° 05' 25" E, 64.80 feet to corner #6, said corner being the easterly corner of Lot 15 and the southerly corner of Lot 14, Block 2, Section 1, The Groves; Thence with a line common to Lot 14, Block 13 and Lot 12, Block 2, Section 1, The Groves and the herein described property, N 85° 25' 07" E, 246.31 feet to corner #7, said corner being the easterly corner of Lot 12; Thence with a line common to Lots 12, and 11, Block 2, Section 1, The Groves and the herein described property, N 08° 12' 06" W, 182.21 feet to corner #8, said corner being a corner to Lot 11; Thence with a line common to Lots 11 and 10, Block 2, Section 1, The Groves and the herein described property, N 23° 15' 13" W, 164.11 feet to corner #9, said corner being the northeasterly corner of Lot 10, Block 2, Section 1, The Groves and the southeasterly corner of Lot 10, Block 1, Section 2, Ashmont in the Groves as recorded in the aforesaid clerk's office in Plat Book 17, Page 90; 2a v_~ Thence with a line common to said Lots 10, 9 and 8, Block 1, _ Section 2, Ashmont in the Groves and the herein described property, N 31° 42' S1" E, 177.36 feet to corner #10, said corner being the easterly corner of Lot 8, Block 1, Section 2, Ashmont in the Groves and being a point on the westerly property line of Property of Carl E. Boothe and Mary J. Boothe as recorded in the aforesaid clerk's office in Deed Book 921, Page 444; Thence with the line common to the Boothe property and the herein described property, the following 3 courses and distance S 22° 06' 16" E, 123.28 feet to corner #11, said corner being the southerly corner of Boothe property; Thence N 64° 04' 44" E, 218.00 feet to corner #12, said corner being a corner on the southeasterly property line of Boothe property; Thence N 48° 19' 44" E, 421.00 feet to corner #13, said corner being the easterly corner of Boothe property and being a corner on the southwesterly line of Tract B as shown on plat of Resubdivision of Property of Nicholas H. Beasley and Strauss Construction Corporation, dated August 2, 1994, as recorded in the aforesaid clerk's office in Plat Book 17, Page 3; Thence with a line common to Tract B and the herein described property for the following 5 courses and distances; S 39° 43' 16" E, 152.45 feet to corner #14, a corner on the southwesterly line of Tract B; Thence S 34:° 13' 11" E, 237.12 feet to corner #15, the southerly corner of Tract B; Thence N 40° 13' 25" E, 166.14 feet to corner #16, a corner on the southeasterly line of Tract B; Thence N 28° 32' 11" E, 32.99 feet to corner #17, a corner on the southeasterly line of Tract B; Thence N 09° 04' 38" E, 103.52 feet to corner #18, said corner being the most easterly corner of Tract B and being a point in the line of property of Eugene M. Martin, Et Als as recorded in the aforesaid clerk's office in Will Book 46, Page 586; Thence with a line common to the Martin property and the herein described property, S 77° 28' 40" E, 357.11 feet to corner #19, said corner being the southeasterly corner of Martin property and the southwesterly corner of property of Albert Akers Martin and Elizabeth F. Martin as recorded in the aforesaid .clerk's office in Will Book 36, Page 602; Thence with a line common to Martin property and the herein described property, S 77° 42' 34" E, 251.61 feet to corner #20, said corner being a point on the southerly line of Martin property and the northwesterly corner of property of Nicholas H. Beasley and T. Howard Beasley, III as recorded in the aforesaid clerk's office in Will Book 43, Page 826; 2b V-~ Thence with a line common-to Beasley-property and the herein described property, the following 6 courses and distances; S 13° 36' 37" E, 120.41 feet to corner #21, said corner being an existing iron pin on the westerly line of the Beasley property; Thence S 21° 34' 35" E, 182.76 feet to corner #22, said corner being an existing iron pin at the southwesterly corner of the Beasley property; Thence S 80° 09' 10" E, 343.73 feet to corner #23, said corner being a point on the southerly line of the Beasley property; Thence N 86° 57' 03" E, 225.71 feet to corner #24, said point being an existing iron pin, in the southerly line of the Beasley property; Thence S 83° 35' S9" E, 120.41 feet to corner #25, said corner being a point on the southerly line of the Beasley property; Thence S 84° 49' 00" E, 497.56 feet to corner #26, said corner being the southeasterly corner of Beasley property at a point on the westerly line of property of James Bradley Carr and Tammy Knapp Carr, as recorded in the aforesaid clerk's office in Deed Book 1440, Page 195; ~~`-" Thence with a line common to Carr property and the herein described property, S 22° 45' 35" W, 124,81 feet to corner #27, said corner being a point on the westerly line of the Carr property; Thence S 18° 34' 35" W, 100.00 feet to corner #28, said corner being an existing iron pin at the southwesterly corner of Carr property and the northwesterly corner of property of T. D. Steele and Elbert H. Waldron as recorded in the aforesaid clerk's office in Deed Book 1327, Page 918; Thence with a line common to Steele and Waldron property and the herein described property, S 18° 12' 27" W, 295.76 feet to corner #29, said corner being an existing concrete monument at the southwest corner of Steele and Waldron property and a corner to property of the United States of America (Blue Ridge Parkway); Thence with a line common to said property of United States of America (Blue Ridge Parkway) and the herein described property, the following 3 courses and distances, S 87° 51' 23" W, 605.11 feet to corner #30, said corner being a point on the northerly right-of-way of property of the United States of America (Blue Ridge Parkway); Thence N 82° 43' 37" W, 946.60 feet to corner #31, said corner being an existing concrete monument on the northerly right-of-way of said property of the United States of America (Blue Ridge Parkway); 2c v-~ Thence S 72 ° 13' 53" W, 450.29 feet to corner #32, said co-rner being a point on the northerly right-of-way line of property of the United States of America (Blue Ridge Parkway) and the southeasterly corner of a pump station lot as shown on Plat Showing the Resubdivision of Tract A, Property of Nicholas H. Beasley, dated December 15, 1994, as recorded in the aforesaid clerk's office in Plat Book 17, Page 101; Thence with the line common to the pump station lot and the herein described property for the following 2 courses and distances, N 17 ° 46' 07" W, 100.00 feet to corner #33, said corner being the northeasterly corner of the pump station lot; Thence S 72° 13' 53" W, 181.41 feet to corner #34, said corner being the northwesterly corner of the pump station lot and a point in the northerly right-of-way of property of the United States of America (Blue Ridge Parkway); Thence with a line common to said property of the United States of America (Blue Ridge Parkway) and the herein described property for the following 3 courses and distances, N 25 ° 58' 07" W, 169.51 feet to corner #35, said corner being an existing concrete monument; Thence S 44° 25' 15" W, 768.80 feet to corner #36, said corner being an existing concrete monument; Thence S 84° 12' 14" W, 397.35 feet to corner #37, said corner being an existing concrete monument on the northerly right-of-way line of said property of the United States of America (Blue Ridge Parkway) and the southeasterly corner of property of Strauss Construction Corporation as recorded in the aforesaid clerk's office in Deed Book 1445, Page 1985 and Plat Book 16, Page 129; Thence with a line common to said property of Strauss Construction Corporation and the herein described property for the following 3 courses and distances, N 45° 03' 11" E, 325.62 feet to corner #38; Thence N 00° 49' 07" E, 252.82 feet to corner #39, said corner being a point in the easterly line of Strauss Construction Corporation property; Thence N 53° 17' 57" W, 231.83 feet to corner #40, said corner being a point. on the northeasterly line of property of Strauss Construction Corporation and being the southeasterly corner of Lot 16, Block 3, Section 1, The Grove; Thence with a line common to Lot 16 and the herein described property, N 36° 42' 04" E, 140.00 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing 52.221 acres± and being part of the remaining portion of Tract C and the remaining portion of Tract A, as shown on the Plat of Resubdivision of Property of Nicholas H. Beasley and Strauss Construction Corporation, dated August 2, 1994, as recorded in the aforesaid clerk's office in Plat Book 17, Page 3. 2d ~" Comm: 94-84 - Description of that portion of Roanoke County tax parcel 96.07-1-6 lying to the north of Ashmont Drive being 14.620 acres of land lying directly north of the intersection of Sedgewick Drive and Ashmont Drive in the Cave Spring Magisterial District of Roanoke County, Virginia, and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at corner #1, said corner being a point of curvature in the westerly line of Sedgewick Drive (50' R/W) and the northeast corner of Lot 2, Block 1, Section 1, The Groves as recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Plat Book 17, Page 89; Thence with the line common to Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Section 1, The Groves and the herein described property, S 73° 03' 36" W, 170.96 feet to corner #2, said corner being the northwest corner of said Lot 1, Block 1, Section 1, The Groves and also being the point on the easterly line of Lot 25, Block 1, Section 2, The Gardens of Cotton Hill as recorded in the aforesaid clerk's office in Plat Book 17, Page 53; Thence with the line common to said Lot 25, Block 1, section 2, The Gardens of Cotton Hill, Lots 21, 20, 19, 18, and 17, Block 1, Section 1, The Gardens of Cotton Hill as recorded in the aforesaid clerk's office in Plat Book 16, Page 157 and the herein described property, N 12° 41' 43" W, 548.83 feet to corner #3, said corner being an existing iron pin at the northeast corner of said Lot 17, Block 1, Section 1, The Gardens of Cotton Hill and the southeast corner of Lot 16, Block 1, Section 1, The Gardens of Cotton Hill; Thence with the line common to said Lots 16, 15, and 14, Block 1, Section 1, The Gardens of Cotton Hill and the herein described property, N 07° 12' 49" W, 258.30 feet to corner #4, said corner being the easterly corner of said Lot 14, the southwesterly corner of property of Strauss Construction Corporation as recorded in the aforesaid clerk's office in Deed 1445, Page 1985 and Plat Book 16, Page 129 and the southwesterly corner of the property of Mary C. Williams as recorded in the aforesaid clerk's office in Deed Book 1322, Page 460; Thence with the line common to said Williams property and the herein described property, N 73° 32' 16" E, 839.06 feet to corner #5, said corner being an existing fence post on the southerly line of the aforesaid Williams property and the northwesterly corner of the property of Janet P. Scull as recorded in the aforesaid clerk's office in Deed Book 1284, Page 988; Thence with the line common to the aforesaid Scull property and the herein described property, S 22° 21' 06" E, 506.32 feet to corner #6, said corner being an existing iron pin at the southwesterly corner of the said Scull property and the northwesterly corner of property of Carl E. Boothe and Mary J. Boothe, as recorded in the aforesaid clerk's office in Deed Book 1078, Page 106; Ze v-~ _ Thence with the line common to said Boothe property and the herein _ described property, S 22 ° 06' 16" -E, 181.79 feet to corner #7, said corner being a point on the westerly line of said Boothe property and the northerly corner of Lot 7, Block 1, Section 2, Ashmont in the Groves as recorded in the aforesaid clerk's office in Plat Book 17, Page 90; Thence with the line common to Section 2, Ashmont in the Groves S 67° 53' 44" W, 201.20 feet to northwesterly corner of said Lot the Groves and the northeasterly 2, Ashmont in the Groves; said Lots 7, 6 and 5, Block 1, and the herein described property, corner #8, said corner being the 5, Block 1, Section 2, Ashmont in corner of Lot 4, Block 1, Section Thence with the line common to said Lots 4 and 3, Block 1, Section 2, Ashmont in the Groves and the herein described property, N 79° 36' 55" W, 85.21 feet to corner #9, said corner being the northerly corner of Lot 3; Thence with the line common to said Lots 3, 2 and 1, Block 1, Section 2, Ashmont in the Groves and the herein described property, S 86° Ol' S7" W, 218.78 feet to corner #10, said corner being the northwesterly corner of Lot 1, Block 1, Section 2, Ashmont in the Groves; Thence with the line common to said Lot 1 and the herein described ___ property, a curve to the right whose radius = 285.44 feet, length = 93.22 feet, tangent = 47.03', delta = 18° 42' 47", a chord bearing and distance of S 03° 06' 55" W, 92.81 feet to corner #11, said corner being a point on the northerly right-of-way of Ashmont Drive (50' R/W); Thence with the line common to the right-of-way of said Ashmont Drive and the herein described property, the following 5 courses and distances; N 77° 31' 41" W, 50.00 feet to corner #12, said corner being a point on the northerly right-of-way of Ashmont Drive; Thence with a curve to the right whose radius = 235.44 feet, length = 6.86 feet, tangent = 3.43 feet and delta = Ol° 40' 09", a chord bearing and distance of S 13 18' 23" W, 6.86 feet to corner #13, said corner being a point of compound curvature on the northerly right-of-way of Ashmont Drive; Thence with a curve to the right whose radius = 25.00 feet, length = 36.58 feet, tangent = 22.45 feet and delta = 83 ° 50' 18", a chord bearing and distance of S 56° 03' 37" W, 33.40 feet to corner #14, said corner being a point of reverse curvature on the northerly right-of-way of Ashmont Drive; Thence with a curve to the left whose radius = 285.44 feet, length = 168.24 feet, tangent = 86.65 feet, delta = 33° 46' 17", a chord bearing and distance of S 81° 05' 37" W, 165.82 feet to corner #15, said corner being a point of reverse curvature on the northerly right- of-way of Ashmont Drive; 2f ~- i Thence with a curve to the right whose radius = 25.00 feet, length = 39.21 feet, tangent = 24.94 feet, delta-= 89° 51' S3", a chord - bearing and distance of N 70° 51' 35" W, 35.31 feet to corner #16, said corner being a point of compound curvature on the easterly right-of-way of said Sedgewick Drive; Thence with a line common to the right-of-way of said Sedgewick Drive and the herein described property the following four courses and distances; a curve to the right whose radius = 475.00 feet, length = 3.70 feet, tangent = 1.85 feet, delta = 00° 26' 49", a chord bearing and distance of N 25° 42' 14" W, 3.70 feet to corner #17, said corner being the northeasterly corner of the right-of-way of Sedgewick Drive; Thence S 64 ° 31' 10" W, 50.00 feet to corner #18, said corner being the northwesterly corner of the right-of-way of said Sedgewick Drive; Thence with a curve to the left whose radius = 525.00 feet, length = 23.98 feet, tangent = 11.99 feet, delta = 02° 37' 03", a chord bearing and distance of S 26° 47' 21" E, 23.98 feet to corner #19, said corner being a point on the westerly right-of-way line of said Sedgewick Drive; Thence S 28° 05' S3" E, 119.11 feet to the Point -of Beginning, containing 14.620 acres± and being part of the remaining portion of Tract C, as shown on the Plat of Resubdivision of Property of Nicholas H. Beasley and Strauss Construction Corporation, dated August 2, 1994, as recorded in the aforesaid clerk's office in Plat Book 17, Page 3. 2g ~-i Comm: 94-84 Description for that portion of Roanoke County tax parcel 96.07-1-6 lying to the south of Ashmont-Drive being 0.423 acres of land lying at the southeasterly intersection of Sedgewick Drive (50' R/W) and Ashmont Drive (50' R/W) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District of Roanoke County, Virginia, and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at corner #1, said corner being a point on the southerly right-of-way of said Ashmont Drive and the northwesterly corner of Lot 17, Block 1, Section 2, Ashmont in the Groves as recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Plat Book 17, Page 90; Thence with the line common to said Lot 17 and the herein described property, S 17° 52' 25" E, 138.44 feet to corner #2, said corner being the southwesterly corner of said Lot 17 and the northerly corner of Lot 3, Block 2, Section 1, The Groves, as recorded in the aforesaid clerk's office in Plat Book 17, Page 89; Thence with the line common to said Lot 3 and the herein described property, S 70° 36' 21" W, 121.11 feet to corner #3, said corner being a point on the easterly right-of-way of Sedgewick Drive and the northwesterly corner of said Lot 3; Thence with the line common to the right-of-way of Sedgewick Drive --4--' and the herein described property for the following 3 courses and distances; a curve to the left whose radius = 285.44 feet, length = 89.41 feet, tangent = 45.07 feet, delta = 17° 56' 49", chord bearing and distance of N 19° 07' 29" W, 89.04 feet to corner #4, said corner being a point of tangency on the easterly right-of-way of Sedgewick Drive; Thence N 28° 05' 53" W, 36.06 feet to corner #5, said corner being a point of curvature on the easterly right-of-way of Sedgewick Drive; Thence with a curve to the right whose radius = 25.00 feet, length = 40.72 feet, tangent = 26.49 feet, delta = 93° 18' 54", a chord bearing and distance of N 18° 33' 34" E, 36.36 feet to corner #6, said corner being a point of compound curvature on the southerly right-of-way of Ashmont Drive; Thence with the line common to Ashmont Drive and the herein described property, a curve to the right whose radius = 235.44 feet, length = 109.47 feet, tangent = 55.74 feet, delta = 26° 38' 28", a chord bearing and distance of N 78° 32' 15" W, 108.49 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing 0.423 acres± and being part of the remaining portion of Tract C,-as shown on the plat of Resubdivision of Property of Nicholas H. Beasley and Strauss Construction Corporation, dated August 2, 1994, as recorded in the aforesaid clerk's office in Plat Book 17, Page 3. 2H 'I ~ 'BK 1454PG 01545 v-~ ~:I~{~ p '~ ~~ M~"Y ~ ~~ G w p Y Y ` I ~ ~, ~s~1 X.~R \~1\• v ,~ 1 1 ~ Iwi „'N I R ~:_~ E~ ~ z . r~~ ~9~p~~q E •~ii~' ~ ~ i 1 8 _ .. /' 1~ \a .pKt ...__- G ~C 1l~.uu_• \, v ,• ~R ~ ~` ~ a ~•;~ % ~ )`r'te 'a R r pier ~ ~ ~~d z ~ + \ P~ n4 . 3~ ~~~ t\,L~ ~ R G~,~E i4` ~a~_ .,1 a I _ R ~~I ~ >i ~ •tA. Y- 1'.' ~ ~ ~ ~0 - 1: i ~, ~ II - s~ b P ~:~, 8 __ ~ Y ll' \ R - ~a Y i _ ~ ~q7 I ``i~ R r I -, , r, : ~ -~ '~ :~, ~ _~ r' ,. ~~ ~~'T_ ' 0 ~ ~..ac s.• R i ', a ~~ ~ a ` $~ ati 'p. `` f~7E n 3 ~~~~ ,; R yipp ~r ~~ tia~ d~a 'dui a"~ c~~E . ~ ~~ ~ R a~~g ~ e,a. x R `~- ~ ~b ~ ~J ~~ E pa~} q, I ' ,\ ~ n ~'j _ s R ~ ar I '~ ,~ 4q III II ~9 P ~• x ~ `~ st. ;I I ~ ~ R ~ ~.~~~ -~ '~I II .r. jljjl~ ~ c ' E€~ ~ / ~ III a II a&~ '.~' ~,' xt; x~ s ~ I ~ ~'~ a ~. ., ~ I ~ Q Z y I. II _~ \` ~.....5_.. O ~ I 1 r z +~ i ,,.j 9 oy Ow' Y v n - Il~~~a , Z ~ py ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ li ~ r~.... _ .. 's_ a~R vv~ Im wx 9 o R II ~ I $ ~~"~--_~ x~ I ~ i. (q 5 I s ~~ •sq °~~ ~D I .o ,ar ~ ~_ ~o vow o I ~ a ~ i :a 0 z 1 ~~ I =" ~7 _ a s F~ I ~~r-tyry a~ IK 2e~9j L-. EY-~ e i Pf7 GG ~ - i_~ e'en E a;i~RF ~ ~ti~ n a: I ~ I 2i Legal Description of Property Located on V - I South Side of the Blue Ridge Parkway PARCEL I BEGINNING at a point at #1, corner to the "Flag Meadow" tract and tract No. 4 of the. partition of the lands of T. M. Starkey, which point is S. 4° 30'~W. 16-1/2 feet from a 20 inch white oak; thence with the line of the "Flag Meadow" tract S. 14° 14' E. 1031.5 feet to corner #2, a stake by marked oaks and maples, and corner to tract No. 6 of said partition; thence with the dividing line between tracts Nos. 5 and 6 of said partition N. 50° 02' E. 3390 feet to corner #3; thence N. 11° 48' W. 1051.3 feet to corner #4, 10-1/2 feet in an easterly direction from a large white oak; thence N. 75° 18' E. 1089 feet to corner #5 in the middle of Back Creek, approximately 25 feet in a westerly direction from an old marked sycamore tree; thence with Back Creek, N. 41° 52' W. 603.3 feet to corner #6; thence still with the creek N. 25° 31' W. 406.3 feet to corner #7, in the middle of Back Creek; thence leaving the creek S. 69° 54' W. 788 feet to corner #8, a fence post corner of the southerly side of an old road; thence S. 12° 36' E. 247.5 feet to corner #9, a fence post corner; thence with the division line between tracts Nos. 4 and 5 of said partition, S. 41° 30' W. 3682 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING, containing 112.7 acres, as shown by a map of C. B. Malcolm, State Certified Engineer, dated August 12, 1941, attached to and recorded with Deed in Deed Book 311, page 253; and "BEING the westerly portion of tract No. 5 of the partition of the lands of T. M. Starkey, a plat of which, made by Joseph R. Woods, Surveyor of Roanoke County, dated August, 1901, is of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, in Surveyor's Record 4, page 32; and LESS AND EXCEPT a conveyance of 9.50 acres "Parcel 2," as recorded in Roanoke County Deed Book 444, page 438; and THERE IS FURTHER EXCEPTED therefrom that portion of the above described property which lies north of the Blue Ridge Parkway. PARCEL II BEGINNING at a stake at a fence corner, designated on annexed plat as Corner #1, said corner being Corner #2, as described in that certain conveyance of 107.5 acres from Mrs. Henrietta P. Starkey to David Wade, by deed of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 29, page 345; thence with the westerly line of the property of said David Wade, S. 39° 0' E. crossing an old road in a hollow, at 205 feet, in all 26.4 poles (435.6 feet) to a stake at Corner #2 (this corner #2 is S. 29° 0' E. 16 feet from a marked 22" pine; thence with a northerly line of said David Wade's land, S. 51° 0' W. crossing a hollow at 670 feet, and crossing another hollow at 1100 feet in all 94 poles (1551 feet) to a 7" marked sourwood tree at Corner #3; thence with the line of David Wade N. 39° 0' W. crossing a hollow at 252 feet and passing 2 1/2 feet easterly from a double 8" maple at 419-1/2 feet, in all a total distance of 26.4 poles (435.6 feet) to a stake at corner #4 on the original southerly boundary line of the original Tract #5, of the T. M. Starkey land partitioned to 2j v- Mrs. Eliza B. Smith; thence with the said southerly boundary line of the property of said Mrs. Eliza B. Smith, now owned by the Harris Hardwood Company, Inc., N. 51° 0' E. 94 poles (1551 feet) to the PLACE OF BEGINNING, and containing 15.75 acres; PARCEL III -~ BEING all of the land and property of E. Murray Hammond, et ux lying and situate along, adjacent to, and south of the tract or parcel of land containing 19.17 acres, more or less, conveyed to the Commonwealth of Virginia by the said E. Murray Hammmond, et ux for the Blue Ridge Parkway by deed dated August 29, 1951, and duly recorded in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, which land and property hereby conveyed is further described as BEGINNING at the extreme southeast corner of the said tract or parcel of land containing 19.17 acres, more or less, which is the extreme northeast corner in the said land and property hereby conveyed, and in the property line between the E. Murray Hammond, et ux and Thomas H. Beasley, et ux; thence along said property line, S. 39° 56' 30" W. 3102.27 feet to a corner in the property line of Arthur; thence with the last named property line N. 17° 11' 00" W. 716.8 feet to a corner in the property line of Harvey; thence with the last named property line five courses: (1) N. 49° 12' 00' E. 297.0 feet; (2) N. 17° 51' 00" E. 269.0 feet; (3) N. 68° 12' 00" E. 339.9 feet; (4) N. 34° 34" 00" E. 216.2 feet; (5) N. 87° 00' 00" W. 604.5 feet to a corner in the property line between E. Murray Hammond, et ux and Thomas H. Beasley, et ux; thence with the last named property line, N. 13° 28' 00" E. 1046.2 ~_- feet to a corner in the said tract or parcel of land containing 19.17 acres, more or less, conveyed to the Commonwealth of Virginia by E. Murray Hammond, et ux; thence with the last named tract or parcel of land three courses: (1) N. 86° 13' 00" E. 898.01 feet; (2) N. 84° O1' 30" E. 525.04 feet; (3) S. 60° 19' 00" E. .459.77 feet to the BEGINNING and containing 59.04 acres, more or less, and being further shown on a photo copy of a plat entitled "Map of Residue Parcel of E. Murray Hammond Showing Relationship to Land Acquired from same for the Blue Ridge Parkway," a copy of which is attached with deed recorded in Deed Book 467, page 119; and PARCEL IV BEGINNING at gum Redoak and White oak pointers corner to the late J. M. Starkey tract known as the Shartzer tract represented on plat by "1" thence with said Starkey line, S. 46 1/4° E. 1138.50 feet to two chestnuts at 2; thence S. 89 1/2° E. 891.0 feet to hickory and black oak pointers at 3 on a ridge; thence the old division line up the Ridge S. 35 1/2° W. 217.8 feet to two dead black oaks to 4; thence S. 66 1/2° W. 334.95 feet to dogwood sourwood and white oak pointers at 5; thence S. 16 1/4° W. 280.5 feet to a sourwood and dogwood pointers at 6; thence S. 47 1/4° W. 297.0 feet to red oak and dogwood pointers at 7; (the above is copied from Deed dated February 21, 1938 of conveyance to Lillie May Harvey by Deed of _ record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court for Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 271, page 340 and is identical except for changing poles to feet to conform with partial survey and balance of description), now being evidenced by a 24" red oak 2k -i and being corner to .fenced lines extending to west and southeast; thence leaving corner 7 and with a new staked line- across the Lillie May Harvey (widow) property whose bearing on the Deed meridian is N. 45° W. and whose magnetic bearing in 1965 is N. 42° W. passing the interior parcel line in the Harvey property at about 1704 feet more or less, passing a 24" white oak with gate hinge on line at 1807.6 feet in all a total distance of 1821.2 feet to new Corner 11 on the northwest line of the 34 acre and 34 pole Harvey tract; thence with the northwest line of same passing old corner 10 at about 65 feet in all a total distance of 419.9 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING, containing 22 acres more or less and being the greater northeasterly portion of the 34 acre and 17 pole parcel and a small northeasterly portion of the 34 acre and 34 pole parcel conveyed to Lillie May Harvey of record as aforesaid, and being shown on a plat of partial survey by C. B. Malcolm and Son, Engineers, dated July 30, 1965, a copy of which is attached and recorded with Deed in Deed Book 780, page 520; and PARCEL V (A) All that certain tract or parcel of land lying on the south side of the Starkey and Back Creek Road about one-half miles west of Starkey and about six miles southwest of Roanoke, in Roanoke County, Virginia, and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the center of the Back Creek and Starkey Road corner to the 44.07 acre tract recently sold to F. C. Collings; thence along the center of said road the following courses and distances : N. 58 ° 50' W. 7.51 poles; thence S. 80° 30' W. 22.37 poles; thence S. 75° W. 10.75 poles; thence N. 81° 50' W. 4.94 poles; thence N. 75° W. 13.51 poles; thence N. 43° 45' W. 2.12 poles to a point in center of road at corner marked No. 1 on map, corner to Cunningham (now Wiseman) land; thence leaving the road and with Cunningham's line passing just on the west side of a large rock on the north side of Back Creek; S. 34° 40' W. crossing the creek at 4 1/2 poles, in all 65.75 poles to a chestnut at "2" corner to the Muse land; thence with line of same, S. 60° 55' W. 71 poles to a stake where a black oak stump stood inside of lot at "3"; thence according to the survey made by J. P. woods, S.R.C., August, 1901, S. 18° 30' E. 48 poles to a stake at "4"; thence S. 1° 30' E. 22 poles to a stake, a pine and white oak marked as pointers at "5"; thence S. 85° W. 4 poles to a white oak and maple at "6"; corner to the James Harris (now Harvey); and thence with the line of same, S. 45° 8' E. 68.5 poles to two chestnuts and gum at "7" ; thence S . 88 ° 15' E . 18 poles to a stake and maple and chestnut marked as pointers at "8" corner to (No. "4") now D. William Good's land; thence with the same, N. 12° 45' E. 63.5 poles a part of the way through the woods and along a fence to a stake on the west side of fence to "9" (76) ; thence N. 38° 52' E. 14.9 poles to a stake by the fence at "10" a corner to the 44.07 acre tract sold to Collings; thence according to the survey made by G. L. Poage, S.R.C., May 1, 1922, N. 19° 50' E. 763 feet to an iron ping; thence N. 24° E. 1603 feet to the :. POINT OF BEGINNING and being a part of the same land conveyed to H. B. Mercerau and Z. B. Hancock by Dr. George B. Lawson and wife by deed dated September 9 , 1919 , and recorded in the Clerk' s Office of ~- 21 v- ~ the Circuit Court for Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 99, page 388; and (B) All that certain tract or parcel of land lying south of Back Creek, about two miles west of Starkey, in the County of Roanoke, Virginia, bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a stone by a white pine at "A" corner to the 35.82 acres laid off to Henry Wiseman and the land known as the White tract; thence with line of same, S. 61° W. 55 poles to a stake at "2"; thence S. 17° 30' E. 48 poles to stake at "3"; thence S. 00° 30' E. 22 poles to a stake at "4"; thence S. 86° W. 4 poles to a stake, a white oak and maples marked as pointers at "5" corner to John Harvey's land; thence with the line of his land S. 48° 45' W. 132 poles crossing the branch and public road to a stake south of a marked gum at "6", corner to Martin's land, and with line of same, N. 56° 45' W. 34 poles to a stake two feet south of a pine at "7" corner to B. S. Harris land; thence with the line of same N. 51° E. 54 poles crossing the branch 30 feet to a stake at "8"; thence N. 27° 30' W. 49 poles crossing two branches to a sourwood and black oak at "9" corner on E. M. Harris line; thence with his line N. 47° E. 38.5 poles to a stake at "10"; thence N. 00° 30' W. passing E. M. and B. S. Harris property line at 37.5 poles in all 45 poles to a point in a hollow 8 feet S. 50° W. to a marked white oak at "11"; thence down the hollow N. 88° E. 28 poles to a stake south of the hollow at "12"; thence N. 44° 30' E. 12 poles to a stake at "13"; thence N. 22° 30' W. 2.3 poles to a rock, corner to the 35.82 acre tract surveyed for Henry Wiseman at "14"; thence with line of same crossing the branch at 30 feet, N. 49° 30' E. 27.5 poles to a black pine at "15"; thence S. 75° 45' E. 61 poles to the BEGINNING, containing 83.02 acres according to a survey made by G.. L. Poage S.R.C. July 6, 1920, and being the same land conveyed to H. B. Mercerau and Z. B. Hancock by Henry Wiseman and wife by deed dated July 1,• 1920, recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 106, page 390; and PARCELS "(A)" and "(B)" as hereinabove described are LESS AND EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING: 1. 37.93 acres as conveyed in Deed Book 444, page 438, shown as "Parcel 3." 2. That certain 2.93 acre parcel as conveyed in Deed Book 465, page 500. 3. That portion of the above described property which lies north of the Blue Ridge Parkway. THERE IS ALSO CONVEYED as an appurtenance hereinabove described, a road 10 feet in width the "Eighth" paragraph of deed of record in the the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, ~•~ . page 438 . to the property as described under Clerk's Office of in Deed Book 444, 2m y.i Existing Zoning, Land Use and Ownership Existing Zoning• All property located on the north side of the Blue Ridge Parkway, is currently zoned R 1, with conditions, with the exception of approximately 8 acres which is zoned AG-1 with conditions. All property located on the south side of the Blue Ridge Parkway, is currently zoned AR with the exception of approximately 12-15 acres, which is zoned AG-1. Existing Land Uscs: Property located ou the north side of the Blue Ridge Parkway is mostly being used for agricultural purposes. Property located ou the south side of the Blue Ridge Parkway; a small portion of the property is currently being used to graze cattle and the balance of it is wooded with no current use. Ownership of the property on the north side of the Blue Ridge Parkway: The property on the north side of the Blue Ridge Parkway is titled in the name of Palm Land Company, L.C. Ownership of the property o the south side of the Blue Ridge Parkway: The current title owner of record is Nicholas H. Beasley and Susan Beasley; however, Boone, Boone & Loeb, Inc. has a contract to purchase this property and the property will ultimately be conveyed to Cotton Hill Land Company, L.C. 3.a. Revised 2/29/96 r-- j I EXISTItv!~ ZONING V~!!_SHIFZE .~~-..tom .oa 'N°. BOGti= AND LOEB, ING LU\ItiUk.~ to>OCltl'k:S. I'.l. i~l,l\fr-•. r~i 101.E I'I%\\'i F!~ gym.. ~n, ~irus~ea Statement of Objectives There are approximately 302 acres identified by the Roanoke County-tax numbers listed in ~ r this application that make the proposed PRD development named `Wilshire" (Developer -~ ~ _ reserves the right to change this name at a later date), hereinafter referred to as the "PRD" The Blue Ridge Parkway intersects the PRD. Approximately sixty-seven acres of the PRD are located on the north side of the Blue Ridge Parkway, hereinafter referred to as property on `forth side", which is currently being developed and is call "'The Groves" The remaining approximately two hundred and thirty-five acres of the PRD are located on the south side of the Blue Ridge Parkway, hereinafter refereed to as property on the "south side". Ownership of the property as it is developed will be in either the name of Boone, Boone & Loeb, Inc., Palm Land Company, L.C.; Cotton Hill Land Company, L.C. or their assigns who hereinafter will be referred to as "developer". The PRD would be developed and built over the next twenty-five years. The character of the PRD is predominately residential Because there is an extended development period, it is anticipated that the types, styles and forms of housing could substantially be altered from today's housing needs due to the social, demographic and economic conditions that may evolve. This plan of development provides the flexibility to offer all forms of residences from traditional detached housing, to zero lot line homes, townhomes, condominiums, apartments or cluster homes. In addition there would be a limited amount of commercial space at the entrance to the property located on the south side of the Blue Ridge Parkway off Cotton Hill Road, which would serve to meet such neighborhood needs as convenience stores/gas station, office and institutional, neighborhood branch bank, day care center and other types of commercial entities that would relate to a residential surrounding. Since the PRD is split by the Blue Ridge Parkway, a great deal of attention has been given to the land use design to ensure that any impact on a visitor of the Blue Ridge Parkway would be found to be pleasing and in harmony with the environment of the Parkway itself. In order to achieve this harmonious relationship with the Blue Ridge Parkway, housing densities have been shifted to areas outside of the view of a Parkway traveler and what development does occur within the view of a visitor has been restricted in its placement, architectural design, and material and color selections. The portion of the PRD located on the north side of the Blue Ridge Parkway is currently either owned by Boone, Boone & Loeb, Inc. or Palm Land Company, L.C. The portion of the PRD located on the south side of the Blue Ridge Parkway currently has ownership of record in the name of Nicholas H. Beasley and Susan Beasley. That property is currently under contract to purchase with Boone, Boone & Loeb, Inc. and would be ultimately conveyed to Cotton Hill Land Company, L.C. The types of residences that will be developed will appeal to a variety of markets from first time home buyers to move up buyers as well as the empty nester buyer. Amenities within the PRD shall include an existing 25 year old farm pond stocked with fish, a tot lot play ground for younger children, a recreational amenity area that would provide a community swimming pool and its needed out buildings and there is the likelihood that tennis facilities would be included. Access to these areas can be reached by walking trail easements through open green space areas which would allow residents from one side ofthe parkway to access the amenities on the other side of the parkway by a walking trail that would travel under the parkway over an existing farm road through an existing 10' x 10' concrete culvert without there ever being the need to travel across the Blue Ridge Revised 2/29/96 5. a. i -- . ~ Parkway. A total of approximately 59.26 acres will be open green space. All open green space, with the possible exception of the amenity recreation area, shall be owned by a , f t j ~ homeowner's association for the benefit of the residents or conveyed to the Blue Ridge V i ~~ Parkway to insure protection of the Parkway with a lease back provision to the ,_. homeowner's association. This rezoning request and the conditions of this application which are made as proferred conditions are done so contingent on the National Park Service granting utility easements for utilities necessary to develop the property located on the south side of the Blue Ridge Parkway, easements for water and sewer would be from utilities available on the developers property on the north side of the Blue Ridge Parkway and would travel in an old farm road through an existing concrete culvert under the Parkway to the property on the south side and easements for gas lines would be in Cotton Hill Road through the underpass-the Parkway passes over. 5.b. u ~r~~ ~ r ff ~r _ _ _ .r .~ ~1 T, ~. ~' t, _ _ `"c - ~ ~ eR 1:~~ 1 I = • b'![!'S .![._ ....,O' .. iL G..tC awe 6.^ea rl.n.., n - ~.X!~.c .yl:G~2w- - -u _ _ wev -_-v_ ~- ow ...._aG w.: c -r i .5~..% ..c ., u -E CC_'.~a.l .e -• GM SlEG~ i•.GG ~!L-_ .L.S- _ _ - ~«~ sz.-~. ~ __ :les CN In .lL a. Ct_!•'-K ~w•e _C'S-_ ~2_- e r y....--r.c~:_ _-Kv S~ •S_. c i3_ 5 ~5_G e"'1 =-_*-.. .. _ta n.,.< vb o-Lw .~~ o~ •`.~ ,~ ~.. ~~~ "!~STFR ~E~IELOPs!E+v' P~~,• OF w! L5~' RE -~ =~: ;. _.s__- - - Q. r~ u • • -~~ --:..~ i r '- :i c ~ ._ _. ~ r. 1~ v Ezisting Site Conditions A topographical map has been included with the exhibits of this application. There aze no known azchitectural or historic resources located on the PRD. There are several existing streams on the property located on the south side of The Blue Ridge Parkway. Some of these water sources aze not wet year round while others are. The farm pond located on the portion of the PRD on the north side of the Blue Ridge Pazkway is fed by two existing creeks. There is limited flood plane area adjacent to these creeks. The property located on the north side of the Blue Ridge Parkway is basically open with very little of it wooded. The property located on the south side of the Blue Ridge Parkway is approximately 85% wooded. The only unique natural feature on the property would be certain views seen by visitors to the Blue Ridge Parkway. The developer has worked m conjunction with the staff of the Blue Ridge Pazkway, Friends of the Blue Ridge Pazkway, The Coalition of the Blue Ridge Parkway and the Planning Department Staff of Roanoke County employing the talent of Carlton S. Abbott, Landscape Architect, to insure great care was given to protect these views. v-- 7.a. ~_i Land Use Designations/Development Regulations The portion of the PRD on the south side of the Blue Ridge Parkway shall be developed at a gross density not to exceed 3.5 dwelling units per acre (approximately 823 dwelling units). The portion of the PRD on the north side of the Blue Ridge Parkway shall be developed at a density not to exceed 185 dwelling units. Gross acreage for the PRD shall include all acreage within the limits of the PRD including all acreage dedicated as open green space or conveyed to the Blue Ridge Parkway/National Park Service or noted as community services property. No more than 1047 dwelling units shall be constructed within the 302 acre PRD. Specific communities within the PRD shall be permitted a net density in excess of 3.5 dwelling units per acre. Property designated as "Cluster Homes" areas on the south side of the Blue Ridge Parkway shall be developed at a gross density not to exceed 6.0 dwelling units per acre. The total amount of dwelling units that could be built in any one area designated "Cluster Homes" could exceed a density of 6.0 dwelling units per acre, however, the total number of dwelling units that can be built in all areas designated "Cluster Homes" on the south side of the Blue Ridge Parkway shall not exceed the total number of acres designated "Cluster Homes" on the south side of the Blue Ridge Parkway times six (6). Property designated as "Multi-Use" areas shall be developed at a gross density not to exceed 15.0 dwelling wets per acre. The total amount of dwelling units that could be built in any one area designated "Multi-Use" could exceed a density of 15.0 dwelling units per acre, however, the total member of dwelling units that can be built in all areas designated "Multi-Use" shall not exceed the total number of areas designated "Multi-Use" times fifteen (15). . The total number of dwelling units that could be built on the above mentioned "Cluster Homes" areas and "Multi-Use" areas could exceed gross densities of 6.0 dwellings per acre and 15.0 dwellings per acre respectively if: a) all the remaining land in the PRD has been developed or conveyed to a homeowner's association for benefit of the residents of Wilshire and the amount to which densities exceed do not exceed the gross density of 3.5 dwelling units per acre for all the land on the south side of the Blue Ridge Parkway, or b) the owner of all undeveloped land legally commits in writing to Roanoke County to a plan for the development of the remaining undeveloped property that provides for all land to be utilized or conveyed to a homeowner's association for the benefit of the residents of Wilshire and the amount to which densities do not exceed the gross density of 3.5 dwelling units per acre for all the land on the south side of the Blue Ridge Parkway. Option `~" shall not be considered until such time as 60% of all lands not noted "Multi- use, "Cluster Homes", "Commercial Services" or "Open Green Space" have had their plans for development recorded with Roanoke County. The owner/developer of the PRD shall be required to submit to the County, with each subdivision plat or development plan submitted for approval, a summary chart showing the 8.a. Revised 12/27/95, 2/29/96, 3/6/96 ~_i current gross density of the PRD, the proposed density of the section or phase proposed for development, and the gross density of the PRD upon completion of the current section or phase. The PRD shall contain a community service area in a location as is generally shown on the preliminary master plan. The size of the community service area is 5.5 acres. This area will be limited to Community Services Uses listed in Exhibit C. These allowable uses are permissible pursuant to Section 30-47-2 (B) of the PRD district and is less than the 31 acres allowed by the code. All community services uses proposed shall comply with standards contained in Section 30-47-3 (A) 7. of the PRD district. No construction within the community services area shall begin until twenty-five percent of the dwelling units within the total PRD (262 units) have been completed. Site development standards for residential areas within the PRD shall be as designated on Exhibits A1, A2, and A3. Yard and Setback Requirements. Required yards shall remain free of all uses or structures except for the following: 1. Fences, walls and landscaping shall be allowed in yards provided that sight triangles are maintained per Section 30-100-8. Driveways and parking areas shall also be allowed. 2. Eaves, cornices, window sills, belt courses, bay windows and chimneys may project into a required yard a distance not to exceed two (2) feet. Cantilevered building overhangs shall not be allowed to project into a required setback area. 3. Patios, decks and stoops shall be allowed within all required setback areas. 8.a.a. Revised 12/27/95, 2/29/96, 3/6/96 _. .N3°~~~~ b N o ? ~ ~ ° axi 'o ° Y oo °' ~ o •.~ a~..i ~yj '~ ~rnal~i .,~ d...• ~ ~ ~.., $ nazi ~ o H v' a~i 'Cl 4--, ~'i Q--•i o °p ° ~'' ~~r, ~ ~ ~ ~ wo ..' `3 y ~ a> o N ~ a' oo z ~n ~i ~ O a~0"i U O O ~ N O •-, ~ oo ~ ~ N z 0 0 '~ N V ~ ~ ~ ccCCGVdd O U pp S O O N ^' O y ¢, ~ O~ U .~ Z O O .~ ~ w O~ y '~ ~ A E-~ N U .-. O ^~ ~ O N C q~"j .'C..~ O w h C~ O ~ aXi O ~ O U ~ ~ C 'C ~ ~ C Rt 'i^' 5 O ..~ 3 N t-i ~ ~ [C .~ N ~ qy 3b> is ~ ~ ~'i ~i Lri ~-+ ~ t/y O M M ~ ~ ~ ~Oi ~ O ~. O O O O N "~ z Qtr Z • ~ v b U ~ .~ O ' Fd ~y cn ~ •5 a' ¢ ~ p q m 00 v a~ ~ Y 'C ~ .~ ~ p. o 33~ ~~ ~~ ~ Z ~ ~ ~ o ~ o ~ v, o M ° ,° ~ ~ `~ o a' b o .~ '~ a`Qi ~ ~ ~ Z N ~ p N "" M '~F N ,~ w :; Z .a ~' O b ~~~~~ ~ ~N z ~ ~ ~" .~ .. w m U m N w N N ~ N '7S '1„7, •.+ +..~ N ~ ~ u . ~f i 4~ ~ N O ~' L'i ~+ ',~ 'C1 eNa ~ R: . j . ° 1'rS~y a`ri O ~ ., .Ly y ,q~,~ '~ 4~~. ~ '{y1', Q ~ a i0 ~ '~ ~ a,, N N v`~i ~ RI '.Ny O L1~ ~ ~ ~ L: ~y 4vg.~' v~~ y .n ,~, ~~. e~a b ~ ~i C ~ .~ ~' 4C,, 'L3 ~"+ ° ° o Q--.i ~+ !C C], .~. `" ~ .O «3 .~ ~ L~. cG N Gj ~i ~ a) ~ dN'' ~ z N O N U 'n N rr M 'n n '~ N r~ 'O 'w ~ tip" t~ ~'"i y 4'"'' a~ .. m V .s7 ~ :: O o '~ N ~ ~ ~ z', :-~ 8 .~ O aNi a~ Y vi U O m ~i ~ ~ ~ A O N U ~ Qy O" 'L3 '~ ~ OU ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ .O _ '~ ~ O N O Cr N L"r ~ +~ cOi O ^ ~ c~ ~ .tiy q E-' C ~ ~ z ~ ~ O ..~"r 4-~i N u ~ ~ ~ ~ j r L" ~O .b 'O ~ O •C ° r.+ O N N ~ F+1 b ,~ . ~ cam '~ C ~ .-r tr y Ri ~f"" y+~i O ~7 lV CJ ~' \D w°~~'' b ~~~ o p°'p~~~Www ~ ~~ rn p: ~" .~.+ ~ ~ 'L7 T7 L Q ~ vOi ¢' v~ ~ `'." ^O Qty rn v] fjr ^O o ~ ° v ~' d O 61 'O ~ U r p o o v o 'o ~ ~ .vim o• ~. v -. U ca A C w aa3 wv~ x ~,wpv a1a¢ ~ v.~ w b C C K C v N ~ TJ ~ ~~~~ - Q ~ ~ aa`~ Q a 8.b. V ~. v-i EXIT A2 Townhouse (A) Intent -The purpose of the following design standards is to provide an alternative to conventional arrangements of yards and buildable areas. (B) General standards: 1. All townhouses shall be served by public sewer and water. 2. The facades of townhouses in a group shall be varied by changed front yards so that no more than two abutting townhouses will have the same front yard setback. 3. The minimum separation between any building containing a group of six or more townhouse units shall be 30 feet from any other townhouse building. The minimum separation between any building containing a group of five or less townhouse units shall be 15 feet from any other building containing a group of five or less townhouses. 4. The height of all townhouses shall be limited to 45 feet. Accessory buildings shall not exceed 15 feet. 5. Accessory structures for townhouse units shall be permitted only in rear yard areas and shall be no larger than 10 feet by 10 feet in area. 6. Only one yard, either the front yazd or the rear yard, or in the case of an end unit, the side yard, shall be improved with a driveway or other impermeable surface intended for the storage of motor vehicles or for access to a garage, or other parking areas. 7. No public streets required. 8. No maximum unit density is imposed providing the gross density of the PRD is not violated. 9. Minimum parcel size: 1000 sq. ft. for each unit. 10. Front yard setbacks for each group of townhouse units: an average of 12 feet, and not be less than 10 feet for any individual townhouse unit. 11. A side yard setback of 15 feet shall be provided for each end residence in any group of townhouses adjoining a property boundary of the development. Where a group of townhouses adjoin a private drive or parking area intended for the common use of townhouse occupants, the side yazd setback shall be 10 feet. 12. Minimum rear yazd setback: 20 feet. 13. Minimum lot size for individual townhouse lots: 1000 square feet 14. Minimum width for individual townhouse lots: 16 feet, measured from center of wall to center or wall or outside end wall. 15. Maximum number in a group or block of townhouses: 8 townhouse units. 16. Maximum coverage for townhouse developments a. Building coverage: 50 percent b. Lot coverage: 75 percent 17. No landscape buffer is required where property adjoins property of a different zoning. . (~ 8.c. v-- ., a EXHIBIT A3 _~ ~ - rn Multi-Family (A) Intent -The following minimum standards are intended to accommodate multi-family dwellings (either condominiums or apartments), ensuring adequate separation and other design characteristics to create a safe and healthy residential environment while protecting adjoining uses which are less intensive. (B) General standards: 1. Minimum front yard setback: 20 feet from any street right-of--way for all structures. 2 Minimum side yard setback: 10 feet for principal structures 3. Minimum rear yard setback: 20 feet for principal structures. 4. No Landscape Buffer is required where property adjoins property of a different zoning. 5. Each multi-family building shall be separated by 20 feet between facing living areas. 6. Where buildings are placed at right angles (90 degrees) to one another the minimum separation of buildings shall be 20 feet. 7. No open space or recreational areas are required. ~_ 8. Additional standards a. No minimum lot size is required b. No maximum density is required as long as maximum density for PRD is not violated. c. The property shall be served by public sewer and water. d. No common open space or recreational areas are required. e. Building coverage cannot exceed 60% f. Lot Coverage cannot exceed 75% g. Building height cannot exceed 45 feet 9. Streets are to be private Revised 3/6/96 8. d. V"'~ a~ ... ~ ~ d u , ~ ~ ~ d o cn V , a a a , , , `may r ~ , , , , , ... b ~.+ ~ ~h , a a~a a a as u, aaaaa Sr ~ °' " as as as y ~ ~ p "' ~ ~, U °' °o ~ ~ v~ ;a ~ W ~ ~ V ~ ~ v ~ .~ Ey v, N , , , , , , , , C/1 V] a , , , , , , , , , , a , , a , , , ,o L ~aWa~ ~ W ~ ~ w l , , , , V] , , , V] V] a , !n , , , , a , , , a , a , , , , io. C~~J ~ ~ a ~a a W ~~ .,, o ~ V a pl o w ~ ~ ~~a ~ a as ~, ~, ~ •~ o 0 H Iry ~ 7.i Ci .7 ee u v •~ ~ ai ^~' ai ~+ ~ .,y., V] ~ v w W ar ~ ~ ~ Pr ~ ;; v C .u ,n o N ~ fl h ~ d ~a H ~ '; x W~ ~ ~4 ~ n ~ dwc~ o ~ .~ ~~ e W ~ ~ y ~, ,n y ~ ~ ~ c7 ~~+ o cn ~~ UUU~ W vaa o4~ o o ~' a~i F F" v tai ~ x o ~ ~ ~~ c d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0~~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~'~ ~ a`i.b ~~.~.~ e, xxxxx xxA ~ ~ 3 a a _ ~ v O ~ ; 0~' ~ d L~'' ~ a. j a~i ~ ~ a~i ~ a~i d .~ x ~ G: R: Q °' ~ N 0 0 0 ~.. ,~ ~.. w .. ~. ..~ >, ~ w N M1 U ~ [L~ Y" ~ ~ 'O F1 N W ~ V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N N N Fr y a CJ hNl ~ FF~~ii ~ Ltr ,~'~ ,n ~ abo ~ ~ ~ ~ ~`W~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3.~w ~ ¢c~u`~.,w°O~ v~3P4 ¢xxx~ ~~~~~ ~~~ww xxHHt~~ a 8.e. i V r~ 00 ^. ..~., H v a~ d.~ a cs.a a a as a~aa , ~ ~ ~ ~' o ~ U v a~ ~ b ~ ~' a ~' ~ ~ a d a ~~ ~. r.., ~ , , , a , V] , , , C/] , , , , , , , , , , a f/] , ~ ~ ~ a v~ b (ir ~ O ~ O~ U~ o, ~~~ x a W ~I , , , a , V] , , , V] a , , , , , , , , , a , , , , ~ N H 3~ _~ W ~ 'v W ~'" w of ~~ b ~, w a n a ~ ~ N WW x o •~ ~ ~~ :." u ~ ~ ~ U W ~ ~ t~ ~ a ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ ''~ O a ~ W •~ .° ~ y ~ 0 ~' ~ ,~ ~ ~ O V O U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4? ~ c~ c~ ~ cC w ~ ~ bD ~ ~ v] v] v] b ~ U a> ^~. O O dc~c~v~ ,.. .'~ (~ 'O "p c~vAww ~ O O ~ wc7]Cxa O cwG NO .O S) zaac~".~ ~ •~ tfy •Y •Y ~ ~~~~~ ~ 8.f. •..1 a a a a •~ O V] V ~ .~ y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,., ... ~ ~' ~4 w ~. ;; ~ ~ kq U ~ ~ W V~-~'~ , I a W ~ ~~ w~a~ ~~ , ~w ~a ~ , ~ w ~ h ~ w W O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W ~~~~o ~ U ~ •U ~ O 'ly ~ O O wc7~,_i U U~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i i s ~ cn ~ i v~ a VI ~ ~ ~ ~ ,. a d v a ~ a ii b v L .~ CT' NNd W •+ .r d a d a 0 . o a .a~i ~ :: rn ''" O r U '"' a0i a~i Ri N ~ ~ 11 ~ 'L7 .~ O d ~ 'O ~ ~ •~ • U z~° ~°°x U G ~ ~~ H ~ ~y~ ~ ~ t+ e ~' ' ~ ;~ ;~ ~n ~ H h ~ °' v~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ N N N W ~n w w w a. ~Q. g g v a~~ ~ ~ M > N N fG f~ C~ LL aAw ~ LG ate.. N !3. C ~ N ~a~ ~ x N ~ 'C1 a V U CJ ~ ~y b 'C T1 ~~~~6 " + ~ ~ N ~ oL c r H.~ . a N ~~ a:~.~ .a:~ a: °:x ~ ~ ~ a ~~~~~ ~ vl .O p ~ N O O O dD ~ .O ~ O O O 'o ^ fn vl ~ y y~ N N N N N O~1 ^O ~ O O O ~ 0 0 0 ~ ~ 0p 3 ~ ~ ~ ~~. ,~~' ~ ~ ~ ~ O _ ~ O ~ f ~ ~~QQQ QQQW W UU W PO ~i Rai 8.g. -_ , r v- •u y a~ ~•~ ~ ~ as ~ v~ ~ as ~ ~ ~ ~ a v~ ~ as ~ aaa a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ V ~ ~ ... ~ ~ r ~. ~ • ri i ~ y ~~~yy ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ F+~ V G7 ~ W r~ V H ~ ~~A ~I ,,,,, ,,,,, ~~E~ ~, W ~ ~I ~~ O ~ ~I H z 0 V y U W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V U ((~~ C-' 1 . l I _ ~ j,.~ y N [ ] W O Is" ~ ~ --~ . ~ V ~ ~ I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ V U U U U A a Y. f~ ~ h Sr ~ ~ ~ U ~" ~~ ~~w ~~~~~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ o ~y,0.Ow C ~ 'c~ `c~ O W w C7 C7 C7 ~ ~ a ~ ~ rTi N O ~ U ~ O " ~~ ~~~ ~ `' ~ ~ cOC xxx~~ U .~ U R ~ ~ C'i ~ N .-~. .Vi ti ~ U ~ ~ ~„~ O ~ ~ ~ ~o~~~ 3~~ ~~ '~ y ~ v. ~aaar~ vi ^ . . O .'., +.., ti r. bq . ~ 'C . ~ o ~ ,, ,,, ,,, "O ~ r- `~ ~ .a ~ a~ o a ~ II o O a~ .~ ~ ~ . ~ . ~ ~ ~ a °: ~ ~ v ~ a ~ 3 ~ ~ o ;? ° c~ v ~ o o ~ M ~ ~ 'b ~ -~ II M ai ~ `i' vi ~ k w h ~ N ..+ ~ ° w ~° ~ c~ ~ '~ ~ ~ • i ~ . ~ f:. ~ ~ ~ C1 ~(1 y~,~ ~ ~ a>~~' i .~i y ' ~. ~ ~ N ~ ~ ¢~ ~~+ T„i s O~ ~ N c7w A . ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ " x a a+ .+ ..+ y~i O c~ ~ II ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -~ ~, ~ ~ a ~ . .. :~ ~ ~ cC "O ~ Ix LYi ~i ~i ~ F- ~ ~i 8.h. v-~ ... __ ... ~~ ~ e e ~ e e ~ U •i.e i7 ~ O C/] U ~ .~ y ~ e e e e e .r ~ r+ •-a y Lr ~ ,N L ~ e e e e e Q ~~ y ~ w V ~~ W V~p ~ ~ q ~A aH al eeeee ~ a~ w ~~ ~W w) e e e e e h+i ~ W P~J e--e e~-. ~o~~~ a~~~~ ..~ N O N H ¢ p ~ TS T1 ~UU~.~ e e e e e e~ e e e e e e - e e e V] e e e e e e e e t e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e , e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e ~e e e e e e , , e e e 1 e e e ~ N _~ N ~~ C N e--e A ~ O ~ U O ~ ~" c ~~~~~ oq ~.+ ~~~~~ H to O O ~ U ~~ Q O ~N.~~ a; >~ ~ oq ~' ~ > o .~U x~ y w ~~~~~ o `' .--. U rn ~ cc~~ H G~p4G4vaE~ •y ~ c~ '~ Cw/] .~ y ~ y ~ .~ o ~ oD ~ ~ ~~ a ~. H ° w U ~ ~ fC H N e e e ~ e e e e e e e e d e e e e e e ~ e e e e e e a u e e e cn e e e v L . ~ CJ' d ~i .~ L d a d y r ~ V 6J d ~~ ~~ ~ >r g ~ o~ 4 C7 ~° '~ ~ ~ v~ oU d •r ~ = M 3 c .~ H i ~' b0 ~ vi i C .~ G ~ ~~ O ~" ~ N :•w•~c7k, u ~a ~ ~ 'a m c'~a ~ ;~ g ~"' a S C¢'w"C~a ~~ a 8. 1. J• Sinae Signage throughout the PRD (except signage required by VDOT or Roanoke County, which shall be their standard design) shall use stone and/or parkway type fencing as a back drop on which to mount the actual signage. Actual signage shall be either applied lettering, sand blasted wood or mounted plaque. Main entrance signage to the north side property that shall be located where Monet Drive enters the property after passing through the Gardens of Cotton Hill Subdivision cannot exceed 50 square feet, however; there can be as many as two signs if located one on each side of Monet Drive with each sign not exceeding 50 square feet. Maximum sign height shall be fifteen (15) feet. ~, Maui entrance siguage to the south side property shall be located where the main road to the south side enters the property off Cotton Hill Road. This signage cau be located anywhere within the commercial services property or anywhere on the adjoining RO or Multi-Use property. Actual siguage cannot exceed 50 square feet, however; there can be as many as two signs if located one on each side of the main road with each sign not exceeding 50 square feet. Maximum sign height shall be fifteen (15) feet. Siguage denoting a separate residential neighborhood within the PRD cau be used but this signage cannot exceed a) 30 square feet per sign within areas noted RO, RV, RW, or Cluster; b)50 square feet per sign within areas noted Multi-Use. The areas shall have a maximum sign height of 12 feet. Multiple signs within a separate neighborhood can be used. Siguage within commercial services areas cannot exceed 0.5 square feet of sign area per one (1) lineal foot of lot frontage. Maximum height,foi signs not attached to a building in commercial services area shall be ten (10) feet. Signs not attached to a building shall either be monument or post mounted in the form of a hanging shingle. No translucent back lit signs shall be allowed. No signage can be closer than ten (10) feet from a lot line adjoining a publicly dedicated right of way. Revised 3/6/96 8. j. v~- Circulation Plan Main road systems have been located on the map submitted with this application. There will be additional individual streets located in certain housing areas which would conform to the housing needs of that specific area. Walking trail easements through green space areas are planned to allow the residents of each side of the Parkway to access and enjoy the amenities of the other side of the Parkway over an existing old farm road and through a 10' x 10' existing concrete culvert underneath the Parkway. Additionally these walking trail easements shall allow access to the perimeter of the farm pond, the tot lot, the amenity recreational area as well as open green space areas designated. Public and Private road standards for new roads within the PRD shall be as designated on Exhibit B. Vehicle access to land uses within the PRD shall be as shown on the preliminary master plan. Access roads designated as VDOT standards shall be public roads designed and constructed in accordance with VDOT public street standards. Islands shall be placed in the entrance road off Cotton Hill Road for the distance of approximately 1200 feet (breaks in these islands will occur based on the final development design of the adjoining properties) provided approved by the Virginia Department of Transportation. Any future extensions of these two roads to adjoining offsite properties, as shown on the preliminary master plan, shall also be public and designed to the same standards. All public roads shall be designed and constructed to VDOT standards with curb and gutter, and an asphalt/blacktop surface of sufficient design to comply with expected traffic volumes. '~ With the exception of curb and gutter (except where the Blue Ridge Parkway has requested no curb and gutter provided approved by VDOT) and surface standards, no public road shall be required to comply with Roanoke County street standards where these standards differ from VDOT standards. All VDOT standard roads shown on the Master Development Plan are approximate in their location and may need to be shifted slightly based on detailed final engineering. All other roads can be adjusted in location by developer. Any road may, as indicated on Master Development Plan, be adjusted to provide a connection to adjoining property for the purpose of providing an additional access to the PRD and developer agrees to provide such an adjustment and connection at the request of Roanoke County. All private driveways and commercial access points for land uses within the PRD shall be from roads developed as part of the PRD with the exception of the commercial service property at the corners created by the road entering the PRD on the south side and Cotton Hill Road. All other roads within the PRD may be public or private at the sole discretion of the property owner/developer. If Roanoke County requires adjoining south side property owners to extend public roads (possible location shown on Master Development Plan)to the boundary of the PRD, the developer agrees, with the development of the appropriate section or phase, to extend a Revised 1/17/96, 3/6/96, 3/14/96 9.a v~~ public road to the PRD boundary so that a through public road connection can be established. The traffic from development of the property located on the north side of the Blue Ridge will travel tluough the "Gardens of Cotton Hill" subdivision (this road was designed to accommodate the traffic) onto Cotton Hill Road and from there a short distance to Route 221. This short portion of Cotton Hill Road is in good repair and is also slated for further improvement in Roanoke County's six year plan. Route 221 is currently slated to be improved and upgraded to a four lane road from the existing four laving to beyond Cotton Hill Road. The traffic from the development of the property on the south side of the Blue Ridge Parkway will go onto Cotton Hill Road and the majority will travel to Route 221. As this property is developed, there are adjoining parcels that the developer maybe able to acquire and if such occurred provide access from the community at another location. Also the possibilities exists that adjoining property owners may develop their land and in doing so provide the opportunity for this developer to tie in to their road system. Currently Cotton Hill Road is in Roanoke County's six year plan for improvement up to where the Parkway crosses, the short distance from the Parkway to the entrance of the PRD property on the south side has not been included in the six year plan. If this 235 acre tract were developed today with its current zoning (approximately 220 acres zoned AR and 15 acres zoned AG-1) 329 homes.could be constructed with a public water system (requiring no easements from the Blue Ridge Parkway). This property is not anticipated to be developed until the year 2000 and the anticipated initial development will be for single family homes where the absorption is projected to be 35 to 40 homes per year. Using this absorption rate, somewhere between the year 2008 and half way through 2009 the traffic on Cotton Hill Road would exceed (under the proposed PRD zoning) the traffic that could be generated under its present zoning. Developer agrees to donate at no cost the right-of--way land needed to improve Cotton Hill Road; however, it is agreed by Roanoke County that after this right-of--way land is donated there shall still remain 5.5 acres of Commercial Service land. The set back for the Commercial Service land shall be from the right-of way that will exists after Cotton Hill Road is approved. Revised 1/17/96; 3/6/96 9.b. EXHIBIT B Road Standards Publicly Dedicated All roads that are publicly dedicated. shall be determined at sole discretion of developer except roads that are noted to be public on the Master Development Plan shall be publicly dedicated. Publicly dedicated roads shall be constructed to Virginia Departrnent of Transportation's standards and no additional standards shall be required by Roanoke County except the roads shall have curb, except where the Blue Ridge Pazkway has requested no curb and gutter, provided approved by VDOT and be finished with a blacktop surface. Private Road Developer shall have the right to construct any road within the property as a private road with the exception of roads noted on the attached Master Development Plan to be publicly dedicated. Any road designated to be private shall have provisions for maintenance by a homeowner's association and shall be of blacktop surface (thickness and composition of the road base shall be to VDOT standards based on the amount of traffic projected to travel that road) if serves more than three homes (blacktop surfaced shall only be required to a point where two or more residences are served from the same common drive). Right of ways for private roads must have a width of no less than 20 feet (widths in excess would be at sole discretion of developer) and m;n;mum outside edge of pavement (or curb) to outside edge of pavement (or curb) shall be 16 feet (widths in excess would be at sole discretion of developer). Developer shall have the right but not obligation to install curb and gutter on private roads. Developer shall have the right to, install private streets offpublicly dedicated streets in azeas of like housing types if developer so desires in addition to signifying private streets exclusively to a housing type area. In areas (except azeas where apartments ~aze constructed or "Commercial Service" azeas) that aze to have private roads the following will occur: ~_~ • Dwellings constructed within these azeas shall have a homeowner's association that shall maintain the exterior of all residences constructed and their grounds and landscaping. • Roads shall be designed so as not to be to VDOT design specifications except as mentioned above. • Signage will be placed at the entrance of that road noting it is a private road. • A homeowner's association shall repair and maintain all private roads • Private streets shall be accessible to all emergency vehicles • The homeowner's association's fees shall be budgeted and include monies for the repair and replacement of these private roads. The homeowner's association's documentation will require it to be managed by a professional property management company to insure proper budgeting Individual subdivisions within the PRD shall have any private roads noted on the record plat ;Virginia law requires by Section 55-512 of the code of Virginia that the developer of property (and upon resale the then owner) within a homeowner's association neighborhood that has monetary fees, as will this PRD will have, disclose certain documentation to a new purchaser. The documents of this PRD would disclose where private streets exist putting future purchaser of resale homes on notice so later they cannot claim they were unawaze of private streets. 9.c Revised 11/29/96, 2-29-96 v~~ Public Services/IJtilities The portion of the PRD located on the north side of the Blue Ridge Parkway currently has water, sewer, electrical, natural gas and cable television capacity to serve the entire development. The portion of the PRD located on the south side of the Blue Ridge Parkway would have access to water and sewer line extensions over an existing farm road and through the existing 10' x 10' concrete culvert under the Parkway to where the utilities are located on the developer's property on the north side of the Blue Ridge Parkway. Other utilities needed for the property on the south side of the Blue Ridge Parkway would be accessed off Cotton Hill Road. All development within the PRD shall be connected to public water and sewer systems. No land use shall be allowed to use wells, septic systems, or any other private means of water supply or waste disposal. The cost of the development of water and sewer facilities within the PRD shall be the responsibility of the developer of the PRD, in accord with Roanoke County law. All new electric, telephone and cable television service within the limits of the PRD shall ultimately be underground at completion of development. The developer shall have the option of providing natural gas service to any property within the PRD. All development within the PRD shall comply with Roanoke County erosion control and stormwater management criteria in effect at the time ofthe proposed development. Prior to conveying any open green space property to the Blue Ridge Parkway outlined in Section 11 of this document, the Developer shall have the right to reserve for the Developer, residents and/or homeowner's association within Wilshire walking trail easement (which shall allow for the installation of surface materials to facilitate pedestrian travel) water line easements, sewer line easements, storm drainage and/or detention easements, cable TV easements, gas line easements, construction and/or slope easements or any other type of easement necessary to allow development of the PRD as outlined in this document. Revised 11/29/95 10.a. ~-1 Open Green Space Plan The portion of the PRD located on the north side of the Blue Ridge Parkway shall have as open green space the pond and the surrounding perimeter of the pond which would be designated as walking trail easements, two small areas to the south of the pond and another area where a tot lot playground shall be located. These green space areas shall be conveyed to a homeowner's association, which would continue their maintenance. Approximately 7 acres adjoining the Blue Ridge Parkway shall be conveyed to the Blue Ridge Parkway by the developer at such time as the developer develops the adjoining property to this land (see Section 11). This conveyance shall be under a lease back agreement whereby the homeowner's association would lease back this property for a nominal sum from the Blue Ridge Parkway to allow the homeowner's association to maintain the property. This open green space property shall not be maintained in a manicured state but more in a state consistent with property located along the Blue Ridge Parkway. The intent of this conveyance is to protect the Blue Ridge Parkway and allow a format whereby the residents would have restricted access and the community homeowner's association could maintain it so it would not become an expense for the Parkway. The portion of the PRD that is located on the south side of the Blue Ridge Parkway shall have an amenity recreation area where a community pool would be build along with pool facilities. It is also contemplated that tennis courts maybe added to this facility. In addition, this amenity parcel of land shall either be owned by the homeowner's association or retained by an entity affiliated with the developer. There are several parcels of land that shall be conveyed to a homeowner's association that will remain open green space. Also, PP~~191~1 ~acres~~b'on~e~e~ o thB~ue.,Rrdg"~P~akw y with 10.7 of these acres on a lease back arrangement whereby the residents shall have restricted access and the homeowner's association will maintain them in a state consistent with the Blue Ridge Parkway. Various walking trails easements shall be placed in a number of locations on this open green space property on both sides of the Blue Ridge Parkway. Specific walking trail easements shall be established to allow perimeter access to the farm pond, the tot lot, the pool amenity area and the open green space areas. A walking trail easement shall be located to allow residents of property on each side of the Blue Ridge Parkway to go from one side to the other over an existing farm road and through an existing 10' x 10' concrete culvert under the Parkway to enjoy the amenities and open green space areas of the other side. Open green space areas proposed to be dedicated to the Blue Ridge Parkway/National Park service are shower-o~Master Developr~aent Plan, designated as~,S.~These areas incorpora~ ~ ~_ = ~~~s.1 •~t~ l~ ~ ~~ ~ Open green space shown on the Master Development Plan, that is to be dedicated to the - ~ Blue Ridge Parkway/National Park Service, shall be dedicated as several individual parcels with individual parcels being conveyed in conjunction with the recordation of the 11.a. subdivision plat of certain adjoining property to the area to be conveyed (see Section 11 for specific time frames for. conveyance). Common open green space/recreational areas within the PRD shall be a minimum of 15 percent of the gross area of the PRD, and shall be generally located as shown on the Master Development Plan. Common open green space shall include all areas dedicated to the Blue Ridge Parkway/National Park Services, recreational amenity areas, and all other open green spaces owned and maintained by the property owner associations within the PRD. All open apace areas shall at a minimum, meet the criteria of PRD district as established in Section 30-47-3 (A) 4 a. - d. All walking trail easements shall be noted with signage throughout the north and south side properties. In addition, walking trails shall either be asphalt surfaced, mulched or blazed foot paths depending on their location. The trails and the signage shall be installed by the developer of the adjoining section and maintained by the community's homeowner's association. Recreational areas may include, but not be limited to, facilities such as club houses, tennis courts, swimming pools, and other similar type facilities designed as an integral part of the PRD. Any such recreational facility shall be operated for the primary benefit of the residents of, and owners within, the PRD. The following is a breakdown of the areas to be open green space that shall be maintained by the homeowner's association, open green space that shall be conveyed to the Blue Ridge Parkway/National Park Service and leased back to the homeowner's association and amenity recreation areas: North Side Blue Ridge Parkway with lease back agreement Homeowner's Association South Side Blue Ridge Parkway with lease back agreement Blue Ridge Parkway no lease back Homeowner's Association Amenity Recreation Area Total Open Green Space 7.09 acres 7.61 acres 10.70 acres 0.78 acres 28.53 acres 4.55 acres 59.26 acres v-~ Revised 3/6/96 l l.b. v-- Architectural and Community Design Guidelines The following architectural guidelines are proferred for areas of the PRD that are noted on the Master Development Plan to have architectural guidelines, areas not so noted are to have no architectural guidelines. These architectural guidelines have been created to protect important areas visible to the Blue Ridge Parkway through the cooperative efforts of the staff of the Blue Ridge Parkway, The Coalition of the Blue Ridge Parkway, Friends of the Blue Ridge Parkway, the Planning Stag' of Roanoke County, Carbon S. Abbott, landscape architect and the developer-- they are as follows: 1. House Building Materials of Exterior Walls Acceptable Materials • Board and batten wood sidmg (stained) • Board onboard wood_sidmg (stained) • Clapboard wood siding (stained) • Tongue and Groove vertical wood siding (stained) • Shiplap vertical wood siding (stained) • Wood shingles (natural or stained) • Log structures (grayish-brown, medium gray or dark brown) • Synthetic or simulated composite building products, such as hard board, vinyl siding, etc., that approximate the wood patterns descnbed above except these types of materials shall not be used in RV areas. • Color for the materials listed above shall be a medium gray, dark gray, grayish-brown, dark gray-brown, grayish-bud buff dark brown and soft muted earth colors • Gray brick with gray mortar • Brick that is gray-ish brown, gray, reddish-brown and other dark or grayish earth colors. All of these shall have buff or gray mortars • Stone that is native to the area • White windows with buff gray or earth color trim, except no white windows in the RV area Unacceptable Materials • Brick that is bright red, orangish-red, pink, light red, white or other colors • Metal siding that is exposed, galvanized, aluminum or other shiny metal materials • Siding that is white, whitish-gray, pink, bright silver, red, bright green blue or colors that would draw attention or be otherwise visually out of character with the parkway comdor • Tile-faced or ceramio-faced masonry units • Varnished, epoxy-finished or otherwise shiny or orangish log structures • White mortar • White trim on windows and doors 12.a. 2. Roof Materials Acceptable Roofing-Material • Wood shakes that are allowed to weather naturally • Treated wood shingles or shakes which have natural gray, grayish-green or brownish-green color • Standing seam copper roofs that are allowed to weather naturally • Architectural grade (includes dimensional shingles) fiberglass or asphalt shingles with texture. The colors of these shingles shall be medium to dark gray, charcoal, grayish-brown, grayish-buff or dark brown. Generally, soft earth tone colors that are of medium to dark value • Slate or simulated slate of medium gray or charcoal color • Textured concrete shingles in gray or buff-gray color • Standing seam metal roofs which are medium gray, dark gray, grayish-brown, black, charcoal-gray, dark grayish-brown dark greenish-black or very dark green. Generally, colors that are soft earth tone and that are of medium to dark value. Low reflectivity. • Roof vents, metal chimneys, metal chimney caps, and plumbing vents shall match the color of the roof or would be black, dark gray, or bronze in color. • Skylights shall have black, bronze or gray trim Skylights cannot be placed on the front of homes in RV area. Unacceptable Roofing Materials v- ~ • Shiny metal roofs • Shiny metal, exposed aluminum or exposed galvanized metal roofs • Metal roofs of the following colors: white, light gray, light tan, pink, red, maroon, light blue, medium blue, dark blue, bright green, medium gray, orange, brownish-orange, etc. Metal roofs that attract attention by their color, contrast, brightness and reflectivity. • Ceramic or synthetic ceramic roofing tiles • Metal shingles or stamped metal decorative roofing panels • Flat roofs • Plastic, vinyl or other high visibility synthetic roofs • Shiny metal roof vents, fireplace stacks, plumbing vents or other pipes 3. Building Mass and Shape • Flat roofs shall not be used • Gable roofs and hip roofs shall be used • Chimneys can be used but not required • Porches on homes can be used • Roofs shall have a minimum pitch of 6/12 on the main structure Revised 11/29/95 12.b. v- ~ • Roofs on the main structure of a residence shall have at least a six inch overhang - ~ - • White columns or porticos with columns cannot be used- - Garage doors shall be oriented to face away from the parkway in areas noted RV • Gambrel roofs cannot be used • Single plane pitched roofs for houses shall not be used on the main house but can be on wings • Steep gable roofs like the "Swiss Chalet" shall not be used (pitches in excess of 12/14) • Where possible, it is preferred that buildings step up and down with the natural slope rather than to force unnatural excavation or platforming of the mountainside 4. Building Details • Awnings shall be medium to dark earth color. White, stripped patterns, and colors that attract attention shall not be used • In the RV area greenhouses shall be oriented away from the parkway and be fabricated with gray, bronze, black or other dark trim White and shiny aluminum shall not be used in any architectural guideline area. • Outbuildings, storage sheds, garages and other secondary structures must match the color, texture and material of the main house. 5. Recreational Facilities "~" Any tennis courts and playcourts shall be oriented, landscaped or screened so that the surface and fencing is not visible from the parkway. • Tennis court and playground night lighting shall not be allowed • Tennis courts shall use dark green or dark tan colors • Tennis court fencing shall be black vinyl-clad chain link fence. Galvanized chain link fence cannot be used • Swimming pools shall not be visible from the parkway. Site plan orientation, landscape plantings and board fencing shall be used to visually screen the swimming pool from the parkway. • Swimming pool equipment, pumps, utilities and service areas shall also be screened from the parkway • Poles, posts, light stansions, gates and other site details will be black, gray, grayish-brown or natural earth tones in color. White, galvanized metal, bright colors and other visually intrusive materials cannot be used • Pumphouses shall be designed to be in character with the development and would not stand out, but rather should be subdued in character. 12.c. v-I 6. Site Details and Landscauing • Driveways shall be surface treatment, gravel, bituminous. Concrete cannot be used. • Roads, service roads and parking areas shall be gravel, bituminous or dark gray concrete. White or light colored concrete cannot be used. • Natural landforms and existing vegetation shall be utilized where possible to screen new buildmgs from parkway view. • Drainage shall be engineered to blend with natural landforms where possible • Plant materials shall be used that are native to the area and to the Blue Ridge Parkway Corridor in the vicinity • Exotic plant materials shall not be used • Blend cut and fill slopes into the natural topography where possible • "Engineered" edges in the final landform shall be avoided where possible • Mail boxes will be dark earth colors, black or gray. Shiny aluminum, white or metal mail boxes cannot be used • Split rail (natural weathered earth color) with two, three or four rails, picket fences of earth tone color (naturally weathered, stained or painted colors), snake fences (natural weathered earth color), and board rail fences (naturally weathered earth color) are the only types of fencing that shall be used • Shiny or exposed galvanized chain-link fences, white plastic fences, and plastic, vinyl or rubber fences cannot be used • Landscape protection zones (LPZ) have been established on the Master Development Plan in order to preserve green belts. The 25 foot LPZ on the north side of the PRD shall have trees native to the area installed by developer within 12 months of recording the subdivision plat that includes any of the adjoining RW property. The 50 foot LPZ on the south side of the PRD shall have fencing and trees native to the area installed by developer within 12 months of recording a subdivision plat that includes the adjoining RV or cluster property (since there are two RW properties and one cluster property ,installation of the LPZ planting and fencing shall be installed in three parts with each part installed within 12 months of recording the subdivision plat that includes a specific adjoining property. All LPZ's and their plantings and fencing shall be maintained by the homeowner's association. 7. Residential Design Cluster home areas noted to have architectural guidelines shall be limited to one story or one and one-half story designs but shall be allowed to have basements that maybe above grade in certain areas due to topography. RV areas noted shall be limited to designs of one story, one and one-half story andtwo-story homes with wrap porches but shall be allowed to have basements that maybe above grade certain areas due to topography. 12.d. r ~ ,` ~ 8. Miscellaneous • Recreational vehicles (RV's) and boats on trailers shall not be stored in any area visible from the parkway • Pre-fabricated above-surface swimming pools shall not be allowed, spas shall be screened from the parkway • Tents, pre-fab summer houses, and pre-fab storage sheds shall not be allowed • No tarps shall be allowed • No satellite dishes, TV antennas or external antennas of any kind shall be visible from the Blue Ridge Parkway road. • Street lights maintained by the homeowner's association may be used in areas with no architectural guidelines but shall not be used in areas with architectural guidelines as noted on the Master Development Plan. In ground signage lighting can be used in these areas. . ._ .._, i 12.e. d-~ Architectural And Design Guidelines ror Commercial Services Property The following guideliucs arc proffered for areas of the PRD that are noted on the master plan to be commw~ity services. These guideliucs are intended to create a commercial services environment that reflect a residential flavor and au appearance that is iu keeping with the residential conunuuities wilhiu the PRD while at the same time providing services that are beneficial and important to the residents. 1. Building Materials of Exterior Walls Accented M~tcrials • Board acid batton wood siding (painted or stained) • Board ou board wood siding (painted or stained) • Clap board wood siding (painted or stained) • Beaded wood siding (painted or stained) • Tongue and groove vertical wood side (painted or stained) • Sliiplap vertical wood siding (painted or stained) • Wood shingles (natural, painted or stained) • Syutlietic or simulated composite building materials, such as hardboard, vinyl siding, etc. that approximates the wood patterns described above maybe used • Brick with buff or gray mortars • Stone that is native to the area • Windows with divided lite grills or simulated grills Unaccc~tablc Materials • Dryvit or stucco • Metal siding that is exposed, galvanized, aluminum or other shiny metal materials • Tile faced or ceramic faced masonry wits • Vanished, apoxy-finished or otherwise shiny or orai~gisl~ log structures • Mortars other than buff or grayish in color that present a bold appearance • Windows that do not have grills _ 2. Roof Materials Accept~blc Roof Materials • Wood shakes that arc allowed to weather naturally • Treated wood shingles or shakes which have natural gray, grayish-green or browiish-green color Revised 11/29/95 12.f. ~_ ~ • Standing scam metal roofs, copper which is allowed to weather naturally or metal roofs which arc medium gray, dark gray, grayish-Urowtt, Ulack, charcoal-gray, dark grayish-Urowtt, dark greetush-black or very dark green. Generally,-colors that are soil catch tone and-that arc medium to dark value. Low rcilcctivity • Fiberglass or asphalt shingles • Slate or suuulated slate of medium gray or charcoal color • Textured coucrctc shingles iu gray or bufi'gray color • Koofvents, tuctal chiuwcys, metal chinmey caps, and plumbing vents shall watch the color of the roof yr would Uc Ulack, dark gray or Uroucc in color • Skylights shall have Ulack, Uronze or gray trim. Skylights can not Ue placed on the front of shtictures visible front the street. UnaceeptaUle Roofing Materials • Shiny tuctal roofs • Shiny tuctal, exposed aluminum or exposed galvattizcd tuctal roofs • Metal roofs of the following colors: white, pink, red, maroon, light blue, medium blue, dark blue, orange • Ceramic or synthetic ceramic the roofs • Metal shingles or stamped decorative roofing panels • Flat roofs • Plastic, or other ltiglily visiUle synthetic roofs • Shiny metal roof vents, fireplace stacks, plumbing vents or other pipes that arc not colored as noted above. 3. Building Mass and Sltattc • Flat roof shall not be used • GaUle, hip roofs, gatnbrcl roofs shall be used • Porches can Ue used • Minimum roof pitch would be G/ 12 ou the main structure • Single Platte pitched roofs shall not be used ou the tnaiu structure Uut eau be used ou wings • Steep gable roofs like "Swiss chalet" shall not be used (l~itchcs itt excess of 12-14) 4. Building Details • Canvas awnings may be used • Any out buildings, storage sheds, garages or secondary structures must match the color, texture and material of the main structure Revised 11/29/95 12.g. V~~ 5. Site Details and Landscaping • All driveways and parking areas must be blacktopped. Concrete cannot be used except in areas where required due to the function of the business. • Except at drivewa}% crossovers there will be a minimum of 20 feet from the edge of any property line abutting any VDOT right-of--.way to any blacktopping. • The commercial service property on each side of the entrance road will have a unified development plan for each side. The unified development plan will be provided for a given side with the sale or development of the first parcel of land on that side. Revised 11/29/95 12.h. v-i Development Schedule _ _ _ _ __ Development has begun on the portion of the PRD located on the north side of the Bhie Ridge Pazkway. Development in the north side will continue for approximately five to six more years. The azeas to be developed during this time frame are to be to the north of Section 2, Ashmont in the Groves and to the east of Section 1, The Groves. Both of these azeas would process simultaneously with. sales progress. Development of the portion of the PRD on the south side of the Blue Ridge Pazkway is not anticipated to begin for five years (yeaz 2000). Development would begin off Cotton Ifill Road with the residential area on the right of the entrance road noted RO, from this area development would extend to the azea noted RV and from there continue m either an easterly direction or southern direction through areas noted RO or RW. It is unlikely cluster home areas or multi use azeas would be developed within five to seven years from the beginning of development ofthe south side property, generally this type housing evolves only after the azea has begun to bu~1d uP suTi~tantially. Community service areas at the entrance to the property on Cotton HIl Road would not be developed untft at least 25% of the residential units allowed to be developed in the PRD had been completed. On the north side: the tot lot playground shaIl be constructed by the end of 1997; the pond and property across from the pond shaIl be conveyed to the homeowner's association at such time as all the adjoining chaster homes property is developed; the open green space land to be conveyed to the Blue Ridge Parkway shall be conveyed at such time as the property noted RW adjacent to it is developed. On the south side: the open green space property to be conveyed to the Blue Ridge Pazkway adjacent to the multi-use property close to Cotton Idill Road shall be conveyed upon development of any of the multi- use property; the open green space property to be conveyed to the Blue Ridge Parkway adjacent to the RV property shall be conveyed at development of the the eastern most piece of the RV property; the open green space property to be conveyed to Blue Ridge Parkway adjacent to the cluster homes shall be conveyed at such time as the road on which the open green space property fronts is developed; the open green space property to the south of the RV property shall be conveyed to the homeowner's association at such time as the RW property adjoining it is developed; the open green space property adjacent to the multi-use property shall be conveyed to the homeowner's association at such time as the multi-use property is developed; the open green space property to the southwest of the multi-use property shall be conveyed to the homeowner's association at such time as the southern most cluster home area is developed; the final small piece of open green space property to be conveyed to the Blue Ridge Parkway shall be conveyed when the adjoining RW property is developed; the remaining open green space property shall be conveyed to the homeowner's association at such time as all adjoining RO property to a certain piece is developed. ~, 13.a. v-i For purposes of clarification the term "developed" as used in the two paragraphs above shall mean upon recordation with Roanoke County of a subdivision plat of the specific property mentioned. The amenity recreation area on the north side would begin development before 25% of the residences to be constructed on the south side property are completed. I ,,- _ 13.b. ~_ i AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MARCH 26, 1996 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF APPROXIMATELY 302 ACRES OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED ON COTTON HILL ROAD, EAST AND WEST OF THE BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY (SOUTH SIDE OF PARKWAY - TAX MAP NOS. 96.02-1-1, 96.02-1-2, 97.03-2- 5, THE SOUTHERLY PORTION OF 97.01-2-17, THE SOUTHERLY PORTION OF 96.04-1-46; NORTH SIDE OF PARKWAY - TAX MAP NOS. 96.07-1-6, THE NORTHERLY PORTION OF 96.02-1-46) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1, AG-1, AND AR TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF PRD WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF BOONE, BOONE & LOEB, INC. WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 27, 1996, and the second reading and public hearing were held March 26, 1996. WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 5, 1996; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing approximately 302 acres and located on Cotton Hill Road, east and west of the Blue Ridge Parkway (South Side of Parkway - Tax Map Nos. 96.02-1-1, 96.02-1-2, 97.03-2-5, the Southerly Portion of 97.01-2-17, the Southerly Portion of 96.04-1- 46; North Side of Parkway - Tax Map Nos. 96.07-1-6, the Northerly Portion of 96.02-1-46) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-1, Low Density 1 ~-i Residential District; AG-1, Agricultural/Rural Low Density District; and AR, Agriculture/Residential District to the zoning classification of PRD, Planned Residential Development District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Boone, Boone, & Loeb, Inc. 3. That the owners of the property, Nicholas H. Beasley and Susan Beasley; Boone, Boone & Loeb, Inc.; Palm Land Company, L.C.; and Cotton Hill Land Company, L. C. have voluntarily proffered in writing conditions which are made a part hereof and incorporated herein by reference and which are set out in detail in the attached Exhibit A entitled "A Rezoning Application: Planning and Desian Documents for Wilshire, County of Roanoke, Virg.jnia, A Planned Residential Development ~PRD), Boone, Boone & Loeb, Inc. Owner & Developer, dated September 1995, updated March 1996" which conditions the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Approximately 302 acres, as more particularly described on pages 2.a. through 2.m. in the above referenced Exhibit A. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. 2 r ~, ~-. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 26, 1996 ORDINANCE 032696-10 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO EXPAND AN EXISTING MANUFACTURED HOME PARR LOCATED AT 5188 YELLOW MOUNTAIN ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 99.01-1-2.2), VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Mountain Investors Corp. has filed a petition to expand an existing manufactured home park located at 5188 Yellow Mountain Road (Tax Map No. 99.01-1-2.2) in the Vinton Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 5, 1996; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on February 27, 1996; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on March 26, 1996. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to expand an existing manufactured home park located at 5188 Yellow Mountain Road (Tax Map No. 99.01-1-2.2) in the Vinton Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1-456 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved with the following conditions: (1) The expansion of the park is limited to 31 new homes (15 Phase I units and 16 Phase II units), in addition to the existing 18 homes, for a total of 49 homes or 4.2 units per acre; 1 (2) Phase II shall not be built until public sewer service is available to the site at which time all units of Phase I shall be required to connect to public sewer; (3) Where possible, replace trees to mitigate the impact of clearing the hillside. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 2 p V-~- 9 k ,.' _ ~~' DEF'ARZTgNT OF PI~NNIA'G MOUNTAIN INVESTORS CORP. AND ZONING SPECIAL USE PERMIT •?' 99.01-1-2.2~ • .,, - Y-- ~ PETITIONER: MOUNTAIN INVESTORS CORPORATION CASE NUMBER: 9-3/96 Planning Commission Hearing Date: March 5, 1996 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: March 26, 1996 A. REQUEST Petition of Mountain Investors Corp. for a Special Use Permit to expand an existing manufactured home park, located at 5188 Yellow Mountain Road, Vinton Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS Martha Wood, an adjoining property owner, stated that she agrees with the first phase of the project but is opposed to the second phase. She expressed concern with the project causing a decrease in market values and with added water runoff after the hill is graded. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Commission asked if the trees will be preserved . The engineer with Balzer stated that where possible trees will be preserved, in particular the buffer yard. Also, trees will be replanted where possible in order not to interfere with the moving of homes. Mr. Witt expressed concern with poor sight line coming out onto Yellow Mountain Road. D. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS 1) The expansion of the park is limited to 31 new homes, in addition to the existing 18 homes, for a total of 49 homes or 4.2 units per acre; 2) Phase II shall not be built until public sewer service is available to the site at which time all units of Phase I shall be required to connect to public sewer; 3) Where possible, replace trees to mitigate the impact of clearing the hillside. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Robinson moved to recommend approval of the request with the recommended conditions. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Hooker, Robinson, Ross, Witt, Thomason NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report _ Other .~ v" ~~~ ~~ Terrance Harringt n, S cretary Roanoke County Planning Commission STAFF REPORT V~a- PETITIONER: Mountain Investors Corporation PREPARED BY: David Holladay CASE NUMBER: 9-3/96 .DATE: 3/5/96 PART I A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY B. DESCRIPTION Mountain Investors Corporation has requested a special use permit to expand the Mountain Air Mobile Home Park. The park is located in the Vinton Magisterial District and is zoned AR- MH. The park has operated for at least 20-30 years, and consists of 18 manufactured homes. This request is to allow the addition of 31 homes on the property. If approved, the manufactured home park would have a total of 49 homes on 11.588 acres, or a gross density of 4.2 units/acre. Two phases of development are proposed. Phase I consists of 15 new homes. It would be served by the existing well and several new mass septic drainfields. Phase II consists of 16 new homes. It would be built only if public sewer were made available to the site. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS In the AR-MH overlay district, manufactured home parks are allowed by special use Permit. New manufactured home parks, or the expansion of existing parks must comply with the Use and Design Standards of the zoning ordinance. Appendix A, attached to this report, reviews major development standards for manufactured home parks. Site plan review is required and would ensure compliance with all county development standards. No new entrances from Yellow Mountain Road are proposed. PART II ' V-~ A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Location -The site is located at 5188 Yellow Mountain Road (Rt. 668), between Mayland Road - and Rockingham Boulevard. Topography/Ve etation -The existing park lies on relatively flat terrain which appears to have been graded to current topography during site development. The area of the proposed expansion rises to the southeast. Slopes in the expansion area vary from gentle to steep, with some portions exceeding 30 % slope. The expansion area is completely wooded with mature hardwoods and evergreens. Existing vegetation remaining in required buffer yards would likely have to be supplemented by additional plantings. Surrounding Neighborhood -Adjoining property to the north is zoned AG1, and is a 14.06 acre vacant tract. To the east is a 118.45 acre parcel, which is zoned AG3. It contains one single family residence which fronts on Bandy Road, near the Back Creek bridge. Adjoining property to the south is zoned AG1, and is a 2 acre vacant tract. The Turner Cemetery adjoins to the west. Across Rt. 668 is the Yellow Mountain Mobile Home Park. It contains 95 homes on a 38 acre tract, and is zoned AR-MH. An adjacent 29 acre parcel is also zoned AR-MH. B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Lavout/Architecture -The proposed site layout is shown on the concept plan submitted with the request. Two phases of development are depicted on the concept plan. Referring to the concept plan legend, Phase I homes are depicted with a single cross-hatch. Phase II homes are depicted with diagonal cross-hatching. If the special use permit is approved, the density of the development would increase as follows: Phase Homes Density I 15 2.8 units/acre II 16 4.2 units/acre Subsequent to approval of a special use permit, site plan review would be required to ensure conformance with county standards. Appendix A reviews major use and design standards for manufactured home parks. It is important to note that some of the existing terrain exceeds 30 % slope where the street is proposed for Phase I. Considerable grading would be necessary in order to meet county requirements of maximum 16 % grade on private streets in manufactured home parks. Additional grading would be necessary in order to prepare home sites and the Phase I septic drainfields. Substantial loss of existing vegetation can be expected. Access -The existing park has two entrances from Yellow Mountain Road. The north entrance connects the site to Yellow Mountain Road through the property frontage on the north side of the Turner Cemetery. The south entrance is via a 30-foot private easement through adjoining property to the south. VDOT has commented that neither of these' entrances appear to have adequate site distance ' _ conforming to current standards. VDOT has recommended the following two options to help resolve this deficiency: 1) "closure of the two existing entrances and constructing one new entrance conforming to current VDOT standards, with adequate site distance" 2) "upgrading of one entrance to current standards and closure of the other one" The interior streets of the existing park are gravel surface, 15 - 20 feet wide. New streets into the expansion area are required to be paved a minimum width of 20 feet. This is the minimum standard in manufactured home parks for minor streets serving 40 or fewer homes. Traffic Circulation -The Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) data shows that single family subdivisions typically generate an average of 10 daily vehicle trip ends (5 round trips) per house. This translates to 310 additional vehicles per day on Yellow Mountain Road, which is a 36 increase over existing traffic on this portion of Yellow Mountain Road. Daily traffic counts (*) on Yellow Mountain Road are as follows: From US 220 Cox Hopkins Rd Mayland Rd Meadow Lane Bryan Rd Quarry Dr Goodman Rd Gearhart Rd Wilson Mt Rd To Count Cox Hopkins Rd 653 Mayland Rd 583 Meadow Ln 857 ** Bryan Rd 888 Quarry Dr 1409 Goodman Rd 1565 Gearhart Rd 2119 Wilson Mt Rd 2466 Roanoke Corp Limits 2616 * 1994 VDOT Secondary Traffic Tabulation ** section of Yellow Mountain Road where proposed entrance is located Improvements to the southern section of Yellow Mountain Road, between Rt. 220 and Rt. 667 (Mayland Rd) are included in VDOT's immediate six year plan. Pavement widening and straightening of some curves are planned for this section of road. No improvements are planned or anticipated for the sections of road near this development. Fire Rescue/Utilities -Fire and rescue service would continue as presently provided Public water and sewer are not available to the site. The existing park is served by a well and septic system. Phase I would be served by the existing well, plus a new septic system consisting of several mass drainfields. The septic drainfields for Phase I would be located in two areas in the northeast and southern portions of the expansion area. Phase I would require Health v-a Department approval prior to site plan approval. V"~ Phase II expansion would be built only if public sewer were made available along Yellow Mountain Road. All units in Phase I would be connected to public sewer and the mass - drainfields would be abandoned. Then the streets and home sites for Phase II would be developed in the abandoned drainfield areas from Phase I. Staff has some concerns about the future grading within the abandoned drainfield areas. The Health Department staff has indicated that soil composition and the depth of distribution/infiltration lines could affect the feasibility of any grading within the abandoned drainfields. Roanoke County has no immediate plans to extend public sewer in the vicinity of the site, but the owner wants this special use permit to address all potential development. All new electrical, telephone, or cable facilities in the expanded area would need to be installed underground to conform with current ordinance standards. Amenities -Approximately 55,775 square feet of the area on the concept plan is reserved for common open space. The majority of this area is located to the north of the existing park. It contains an existing mass septic drainfield, and a gazebo is proposed within the area. A smaller open space area is located around the existing well house and proposed office/laundry facility. A childrens' play area is proposed within this area. Each new unit would have an outdoor patio area and a storage area, as required by ordinance standards. Type C screening and buffering is required around the entire expansion area. C. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The site is located in an area designated Rural Preserve in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. This land use designation offers a high degree of protection to preserve existing agricultural, recreational and forestal resources, while permitting a limited, very low density residential settlement pattern. The proposed development is inconsistent with the policies and guidelines of the Rural Preserve land use designation. The property is zoned AR-MH, and is currently used for a manufactured home park. Impacts from the proposed expansion would be limited to the subject parcel. The proposed expansion of the existing park should not adversely affect adjoining agricultural, forestal or open space resources. D. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD The site is currently zoned AR-MH. According to Section 30-48-1 of the zoning ordinance, "the provisions of the Manufactured Housing Cryerlay District are designed to increase opportunities for affordable housing alternatives, to recognize modern advances in manufactured housing technology, and to promote cost effective site development. " Development or significant expansion of manufactured home parks within the R-MH overlay requires a Special Use Permit. As demonstrated by the concept plan, the site appears to have adequate space to meet the zoning ordinance use and design standards for manufactured home parks. Lot areas, density, setbacks, ~, ~... recreation and open space, and buffer yards appear to conform. with use and design standards Site plan review and health department approval are required prior to development, and will _ ensure compliance with all applicable development standards. PART III STAFF CONCLUSIONS The Manufactured Housing Overlay District was established in recognition that manufactured homes offer affordable housing alternatives to Roanoke County residents. The Special Use Permit requirements allow the County to evaluate specific design elements and impacts associated with the construction or expansion of a manufactured home park. Staff anticipates that the expansion of the Mountain Air Mobile Home Park, at the proposed density, would not negatively affect surrounding properties. The park's duration of use, AR-MH zoning, and immediate proximity to another, larger manufactured home park makes this location suitable for expanding the existing use. Staff suggests the following two conditions for the special use permit: 1) The expansion of the park is limited to 31 new homes, in addition to the existing 18 homes, for a total of 49 homes, or 4.2 units/acre. 2) Phase II shall not be built until public sewer service is available to the site, at which time all units of Phase I shall be required to connect to public sewer. In addition to the above conditions, staff suggests that the Planning Commission consider VDOT's comments about the existing entrances, and determine whether conditions of the Special Use Permit are necessary to address VDOT's concerns. PREPARED BY: DAVID HOLLADAY DATE: 3/5/96 • APPENDIX' A \ r ~ a„~ Mountain Air Mobile Home Park Proposed Expansion ~1 Analysis of Conformance with Major Use and Design Standards CJ • _ ITEM ORDINANCE STANDARD MOUNTAIN AIR MOBILE HOME PARK PROPOSAL PARCEL SIZE MINIMUM 5 ACRES 11.588 ACRES STREET FRONTAGE MINIMUM 50 FEET 216 FEET DENSITY MAXIMUM 7 MAXIMUM OF 4.2 UNITS/ACRE UNITS/ACRE BUFFER TYPE C REQUIRED TYPE C PROVIDED LOT SIZE 4000 SQUARE FEET WILL MEET OR EXCEED MINIMUM RECREATION AREA 8% OF GROSS AREA 11.1 % (55,775 SF) STORAGE AND REQUIRED FOR EACH WILL BE PROVIDED PATIO AREAS UNIT STREET WIDTHS 20 FEET REQUIRED 20 FEET PROVIDED UTILITIES MUST BE NEW UTILITIES WILL BE UNDERGROUND UNDERGROUND WATER AND SEWER WELLS AND SEPTIC WILL BE APPROVED BY APPROVED BY HEALTH HEALTH DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL 1 ~ ` • • COUNTY OF ROAN~OKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW - _ . _ _ P.O. Box 29800 - _ Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 l~ For s'faff use only ~~-Q '/Z4~'~ `~"h^ date received: / ~~,Ilr -4 received by: ~/~ ~'~Y application fee~/'J~ C, 7 PC/BZA date:~~ placard issued• ~ (_., BOS date: J7 Case Number: --r Check type of application filed (check all that apply): D REZONING CX7 SPECIAL USE OVARIANCE Applicant's name: Balzer & Associates, Inc. ATTN: Pats Miley Phone: 772-9580 Address: 1208 Corporate Cit:rcle, Roanoke VA Zip Code: 24018 Owner's name: Mountain Investors, Corporation Phone: 776-6901 Address: PO Box 200453 Roanoke, VA Zip Code: 24018 Location of property: ~5y/~ D Tax Map Number: gg . 01-1- , Yellow Mountain Road Rte 668 Magisterial District: Vinton Community Planning Area: Mt. Pleasant Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: 11 SRR acres ~-~ OVERLAY (AGRICULTURAL - MAN[JFACI'IJRID HOME) Existing Land Use: sq.ft. MANUFACri'CTRED HOME PARK ('i$ Units) . Proposed Zoning: pR = MH ~ For wart use o~ Proposed Land Use: Use Type: NPR H1~ PAID {4-`( LYrits) Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES x NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES X NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being prorered with this request? YES NO Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v ws v ws v Consultation X 8 1 /2" x 1 1" concept plan x Application fee x Application X «u Metes and bounds description ':;>>; Proffers, if applicable X Justification X '~?~ Water and sewer application X Adjoining property owners l hereby certify that l am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and onsent of the owner _ Owner's Signature: ~ v ~~ for SraH Use Only: Case Number . _ - ~~/- Applicant Balzer and Associates Inc. . The Planning Cflmmission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the. need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. • Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 3Q-3) as.well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. The expanded manufactured home park would provide for adequate light, air, convenience of access, and safety from fire, flood, and would create a convenient, attractive and harmonious community. The request increases the availability of affordable housing while providing adequate utilities, recreational facilities,. and parking.. The site conforms to all the requirements of the R-MH zone. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. Although the subject property is designated as Rural Preserve in the Comprehensive Plan, it is currently zoned for and used as a Manufactured Home Park. The project provides expanded opportunities for affordable housing in~an attractive community with recreational facilities. The existing woodlands will~~be preserved in a buffer around the perimeter of the project, and individual lots will also preserve trees where possible. Please describe the impact(s) of the request cn the propery itself, the adjoining properies, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sevve r, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. Initial expansion would add 15 units to the existing 18 units. All units would be served by private water and septic systems. A licensed soils scientist has determined that soils are adequate for 15 homes. When the County extends public sewer to the site, an additional 16 units would be added. Yellow Mountain Road would experience some additional traffic. Adequate fire and rescue access is provided in both expansion phases. Current residents of the park would enjoy expanded recreational facilities, and new laundry facilities. Additional properties would. be buffered by natural vegetation supplemented by planted trees. ROAH02CE COQNTY UTILITY DEPARTM$NT v-~- APPLICATION FOR WATER OR SEWER SERVICE TO PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Date Name of Applicant Balzer Associates, Inc. =n~-Ta~ ~} ~2z P h o n e 7 7 2- 9 5 8 0 Address of Applicant 1208 Corporate Circle, Roanoke VA 24018 Name of Developer .Mountain Investors, Corp. phone 776-6901 Address of Developer PO Box 20453, Roanoke, VA 24018 Name of Design Engineer pat M;iA., Phone 77a_a58-0 Address of Design Engineer 1208 Corporate Circle, Roanoke VA 24018 Name of Contact Person _pat Mi 1P~ Name of Proposed Development ~ _ Type :ofDevelopment and proposed number .of ,units (Be specific) - _ _ Mahcn-Fac(tit~a! {~e~r,t ~a~(~ : I~ ~xisFina~ yhi-f-5 - - 15 I~~tasc ~ cxPansian uni-~S l Co p(~tSC I~ ~ ~~ trn-, ~ ~ i-~ 4q ~ -~-~' 1 vh i-F5 Location of proposed developc~ent (FURNISH COPY OF IKa.P AND PLP.~~TI~.t-c,TRIC \iz~ER): Y~l 1 c}~ T ~4e ~ a to ~n--~e ad~1-~e--6-6-8~- Size of proposed development in acres: X1.588 Acres Give minimum and maximum elevation (Use USGS Elevations) at which the individual water/sewer service connections would be located: Minimum 115 feet MSL. Maximum 1?~5 feet MSL Is this application for a development that will be a part or section of a larger future development? X No Yes . if yes, provide map of entire area if available. (OVEN) ~ . - S' na ure o Applican t J i, ~ ` i A ~, ( ~ ~ * jj j p, ;p ~h ht,r~ _ 1 i j j 1 l• r t .•., S n _~. ,. i , ~. ~ ~~ r ,` a. - c P -- ~. ~ t r ~.` - ` >. _ ., ~ ,' y ~ ~ ~ ~ _ k~. ~~~~ ~ Y 4 ; 7 ~ Y ilk ~ J ~ ~ 'L r ..5 . i ~ ~ ~s ~ rt ~3 Z a 3 f't - r y k, ~ •r 4, Y .mot _ ~ Z •5 k ~ l ~ `j T: 1 1. ~ e _ ~ ~/ ~ ~ .: is r ~' s s -t-`S V 1.Y c-'~ -t. f J~ .q- - { _ T,. . N ' i': buy °.v/ a'F' `~: fps ~ i ~.. Y4 ~ i 1 -~ :~. 1 t ,~ s` . -r ~ 1 €~ a t ~ _ r ~r 7: ~~ _ __ 2oAt~o K~ Co~-..~-ry ~Le.11 t N1~ T~.t c ~1 ~'P ~' P t n Scac,~ : ~' ;; ~o~' ~~ : J~.i , t o, t99t~ Ju: q~t~7 ' ~„ ~'.". .'^~i~ l ;i ~ _ ,1 _ r :• e i~ = i _ nN~~atn ;cLVno~ ~voNVOa - ~ ~ i c;' • ~ '=_ ~ 3?. NOISNT/~Yd Y?li~d 3lYOH ° ~ i ~, .. ' i` i ? i' i ~ t=i Q3?Il1.LJVdlWY'lN 3?II~N.I3'lNl2011' m a ~ ~ i . '; i; iii r~rrd.rdaoNOO W ~ .. 4 ~ ~ ~' - i; - ~ 1t ,` A 't1 R ~ ~~ '~ ~ ~r~5 C ~ 9! b: ° ~' ~ ~ '~~a / ass _ . - ;~ ', ~_ Ea rrrr _ ~;~ _ € ~ -.~...._ J ~ o a s 4 _t ~' a as s' s is L ~ ~~ "~ij ~~ e : s ~ r t p ~ e ~ ~ ~ W 1 .~~~1 .. .. ` ~ oo'je~ ..'~ - ~~ _ _ 4 - .~CZz ~~ ... ,_~ L'_~'`w `mac 1 ,1 p ', ~\ \.~~~ .'~. ~•. "-~,--` ~ )e. „fT. - `tell ^ ~. ~~; C , 3 t~ ~~ oe~ (_~JI u -•r---z-~.c 3 ' ". ~_ $ R ~ _ n 0 ~ - c _ ~ . I. • . ~, ~, : ~dS n T2i _ ~; .ot1 fY(/ ~ ~ ~ a :~ ~. s c,~r co ' t t we ~xv i~~~~=' ROAN OKE COUNTY 'llt! ~ ~ eap ~ A^ ~ w.w.nu 'Ym bn/ •//1 i~ ~ ~ •row \ .~/'` _ ~--_~-- - --- _`, ~ -_ V 1 C 1 N 1 T Y MAP ~ NORTH ,,, ~+R-M~~ • ~, r _ __~ ....- A~ :, A~ ~ 1 .~~ ~ AR-M~~ _- q~w, ~~ ~°A, . ~ . ~ ~- . '~ u r / PG ~. , /` . ' _ ,.... ,.. ~~~ 'c~ A G-3 ~~ \~l ~ ~1OTurkay l~g• RooO lu , 1..; ~ 3 e / : 2.1 ,.~.. ,- i ~ II .2 1 i 89 AC ~.~ ~ `~ ~A2~ 1 ~"' v ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ r\ `v `~~ ~\ / 2 1J17 37.02 Ac ~~ W,° ,* 1 S.OAc ~~~~ SN Mop 89.03 1• • 200' ~~~ .>>~ ~~ 10 9.~ .09 Ac . w ~A< .. 9 . $ ,~ l~s~ ,• , ~~?? ~. I ~ AG J i3 - ~"' moo 118.43 Ae ` H @° X250 ~~ ~ i-~ \~ Ob .1_ ~ ~ 1. `~ 49 so clD AG~~ ~'~ `(. I~ i 1 1. 5~~9 l` 7897 Ac v 5~1 ~, . t` R ~~ ~S eoo `~C~A ~ ~ G 8 31 Q ~ p4 Ac lD) ~ 38%ACIDt~ s.xlcl . ~ji a762ACC1 -. J o ~ OJ ~/ \ ~,. a~ \; ~.do ~ P "moo. 4 9 1332Ac \` °d R~ p 0 S 9~ ~~9s ~ ssT so~~C/ 6 7 ..,\ ~s 31.I I Ac 4.65Ac ~rsl~il • 8 25 22 $4-66 Ac ~ pei4c 1 25 ... ~ 6S At 12 _ ~~ > DEPARZTg2i'T OF PLANNII~'G AND ZONING .~ ,~, MOUNTAIN INVESTORS CORP. SPECIAL USE PERMIT 99.01-1-2.2~~ \ ~ , ~.' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 26, 1996 ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO EXPAND AN EXISTING MANUFACTURED HOME PARK LOCATED AT 5188 YELLOW MOUNTAIN ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 99.01-1-2.2), VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Mountain Investors Corp. has filed a petition to expand an existing manufactured home park located at 5188 Yellow Mountain Road (Tax Map No. 99.01-1-2.2) in the Vinton Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 5, 1996; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on February 27, 1996; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on March 26, 1996. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board f finds that the granting of a special use permit to expand an existing manufactured home park located at 5188 Yellow Mountain Road (Tax Map No. 99.01-1-2.2) in the Vinton Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1-456 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved with the following conditions: (1) The expansion of the park is limited to 31 new homes (15 Phase I units and 16 Phase II units), in addition to the existing 18 homes, for a total of 49 homes or 4.2 units per acre; (2) Phase II shall not be built until public sewer service is available to the site at which time all units of Phase I shall be required to connect to public sewer; (3) Where possible, replace trees to mitigate the impact of clearing the hillside. Za~B.mo~~„-.~~ 2 ~ .. l r. \` / r AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MARCH 26, 1996 ORDINANCE 032696-11 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 1.07-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED 7605 ROBERTSON LANE (TA% MAP NO. 27.11-1-8) IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF I-1 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF HCMF CORP. WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on January 23, 1996, and the second reading and public hearing were held March 26, 1996; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on February 6, 1996 and March 5, 1996; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 1.07 acres, as described herein, and located 7605 Robertson Lane (Tax Map Number 27.11-1-8) in the Hollins Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District, to the zoning classification of I-1, Industrial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of HCMF Corp. 3. That the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts: (1) Uses on the property shall be those allowed in the 1 I-1 Industrial District, excluding the following: (a) automobile repair services; (b) landfill, rubble; (c) recycling centers and stations; (d) transportation terminal; (e) truck terminal; (f) amateur radio tower; (g) broadcasting tower; (h) parking facilities; (i) commercial indoor sports and recreation; (j) truck stop; (k) resource extraction; (1) transfer station; (m) aviation facilities, private. (2) The site will be developed in substantial conformity with the concept plan prepared by Balzer and Associates, Inc., dated December 21, 1995. (3) The building will be developed in substantial conformity with the architectural rendering prepared by Balzer & Associates, dated February 29, 1996. (4) The landscaping along the length of the front of the building will be twice the density as that required by the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. (5) There will be no access from Lula Avenue. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Beginning at a point in the center of a 30 foot road, shown as "B" on plat, said point located N. 22 deg. 45' W. 435.7 feet along center of road from the west side of U. S. Route 11; thence along center of 30 foot road, N. 22 deg. 45' W. 295.0 feet to a stake at "C" on line of Dr. Frank S. Cooper property; thence with Cooper line, N. 61 deg. 04' E. 173.5 feet to a point at "D"; thence still with Cooper line, S. 22 deg. 23' E. 313.8 feet to an iron at "E", corner to parcel No. 3-B; thence with line of same, S. 67 deg. 15' W. passing an iron on east side of the 30 foot road at 155.7 feet, in all 170.7 feet to the Beginning, containing 1.20 acres, and being Parcel No. 3-A as shown in detail on plat prepared by T. P. Parker, SCE, dated July 1946. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, 1 and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance with proferred conditions and the understanding that Balzer and Associates will create a pleasing facade on the building, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Minnix, Harrison, Nickens NAYS: Supervisor Eddy ABSTAIN: Supervisor Johnson A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney r ~ i _ - y -~ _- •~ ~- P~9 `~ ~pY .~~~xt 'g~~ vOSH I \\-js\~ ' C.,J. ~ ~ 'C( y \ rt ~ _ ~ f ~ \ ~ _ - 0`i ~ ~p f ~ ~ '. \ =lei; ,~ ,rS \y"NORTH BURUNi"~ .t~~~:L~ ^ ~o-v~c~,-?^y 4,/ 7 ~r_~ ~.~ qr ~'MI. ~ ... l,f Q~ _.rt ~i..'a: ° °a yeas °T v+P~ ~~ cr _ _ 9 J, `w r .:y~~' pis ~2 apC ~`r •~._'~:~ 4 f f 220 ~~viJ~' ~ 40 ~ ep,vxp~y~~~(tq~ 1T8T ~~ ~~~tl,o~~r,a~" o~•~~ -'~ ~'~ r~i a N l7R 1C~ C ('O~` ~L Cp ~ L ~ ~~9~ N ~a 1 P'•t C 1 ~a.,` ~ ~ e C-2 TO I-1 HCMF CORP, ~~ ~~ ' _ DE?ARTMF~!'I' OF PI1a1~NI\G 27. 1 l -1- 8 ?~~Z ~~ ~ ~ i• •~ ~ i?.} _.s •S PETITIONER: HCMF CORP. CASE NUMBER: 6-2/96 Planning Commission Hearing Date: February 6, 1996 and March 5, 1996 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: March 26, 1996 V-3 A. REQUEST Petition of HCMF Corp. to rezone 1.07 acres from C-2 to I-1 to construct offices and warehouse for pharmaceutical supplies at 7605 Robertson Lane, Hollins Magisterial District. (CONT. FROM FEBRUARY) B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION In response to questions from the Commission, Craig Balzer commented as follows: the exterior of the building will be of a neutral or off white color; the awnings will be non-metallic; approximately 9 to 18 people will be employed at the site; the location of the air-conditioning unit has not been determined. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS 1) Uses on the property shall be those allowed in the 11 Industrial District, excluding the following: a. Automobile Repair Services; b. Landfill, Rubble; c. Recycling Centers and Stations; d. Transportation Terminal; e. Truck Terminal; f. Amateur Radio Tower; g. Broadcasting Tower; h. Parking Facilities; I. Commercial Indoor Sports and Recreation; j. Truck Stop; k. Resource Extraction; I. Transfer Station; m. Aviation Facilities, Private; 2) The site will be developed in substantial conformity with the concept plan prepared by Balzer and Associates, Inc., dated December 21, 1995; 3) The building will be developed in substantial conformity with the architectural rendering prepared by Balzer & Assoc. dated February 29, 1996; 4) The landscaping along the length of the front of the building will be twice the density as that required by the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance; 5) There will be no access from Lula Avenue. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Ross moved to recommend approval of the petition with the proffered conditions. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Hooker, Robinson, Ross, Witt, Thomason NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report _ Other Terrance Harrington; Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commission V-3 • MEMO TO: Planning Commission FROM: David Holladay DATE: March 1, 1996 SUBJECT: Architectural sketch of HCMF warehouse During the 2/6/96 public hearing of the petition of HCMF Corp to rezone 1.07 acres from C2 to I1, the Planning Commission expressed concerns about the type of structure that was proposed, facade of the proposed building and the relation of the site to the Williamson Road beautification project. Due to these concerns, the petition was continued until 3/5/96. The attached sketch of the proposed HCMF warehouse was received the afternoon of 3/1/96. It has the appearance of a one-story, pre-engineered metal warehouse building. It does not appear to address the concerns expressed by the Planning Commission. STAFF REPORT iM PETITIONER: HCMF Corporation PREPARED BY: David Holladay CASE NUMBER: 6-2/96 DATE: 2/6/96 - PART I A. EXECUTIVE Si:T~vIMARY B. DESCRIPTION V-3 HCMF Corporation wishes to rezone 1.07 acres located at 7605 Robertson Lane, in the Hollins Magistral District, from C2 to I1 Conditional. The proposed land use is a pharmaceutical office and warehouse. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Warehouses are permitted, as a use by right, in the Il zoning district. Acc6rding to the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance, "the purpose of the I1 zoning district is to provide areas within the urban service area which are suitable for less intensive, industrial activities." Site plan review is required to ensure conformance with county standards. If the rezoning request is approved, then Type C screening and buffering would be required on three sides where the site adjoins the C2 zoning district. VDOT approval is required for the proposed new entrance from Robertson Lane. PART II A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING COI\TDITIONS Location -The site is located at 7605 Robertson Lane, in the Hollins Magisterial District. Robertson Lane connects to Plantation Road between the intersection of Williamson Road and Milk-a-way Drive. To~ography/Ve eg tation -Topography is gently sloping and grassy, with a few trees and shrubs around an old house foundation. Surrounding Neighborhood -All surrounding properties are zoned C2. Surrounding land uses - include the following: Northwest -Old Dominion Motor Court, mobile home park Northeast -Hollins Manor properties, single family land use i• _ from Robertson Lane. Robertson Lane intersects with ~ Access Anew entrance is proposed Plantation Road, and the improved section. terminates. just beyond 7527 Robertson Lane. The public right of way continues to Williamson Road, but is unimproved. An unimproved section of Lula Avenue connects to the northeast boundary of the property. Per the proffered site plan, no access is proposed from Lula Avenue. Traffic Circulation - 1994 traffic counts in the vicinity are as follows: Street From To Vehicles per day Rt 1901, Robertson Lane Rt 115 dead end 274 Rt. 115, Plantation Road Rt 11 I-81 16,367 Fire Rescue/Utilities - No impact to fire and rescue or utility service. C. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTI' COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The site lies within the Core land use designation of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. The Core areas are centralized locations that are suited for a mix of high intensity urban uses, particularly commercial and multi-family residential. ' The proposed rezoning does not conform with the policies and guidelines of the Core land use designation. The proposal could conform with some of the policies if exceptional site design were implemented. Policy C-4 encourages coordinating the design of commercial sites, particularly in regards to the following items: site to site movement for vehicles, pedestrian, and bicycles should be easy; vehicular access points to public streets should be kept to a minimum and if feasible, shared among sites; building size, shape, height, and materials should compliment adjacent buildings; signs should enhance the overall character of the Core district and not be a visual detraction for motorists; natural site amenities, especially slope and trees, should be conserved to the maximum practical extent. Policy C-5 encourages separation, screening and buffering along the edge of core areas for the purpose of reducing nuisances with less intensive development, particularly single family detached residential. The petitioner has requested that consideration be given to the close proximity of a Principal Industrial land use designation, which begins to the east of Milk-a-way Drive and continues through the I-81 interchange. The petitioner also has referenced one of the policies of the Principal Industrial land use designation which "acknowledges that small. industries should be j permitted, to a limited extent, outside these areas". Policy I-8: Provide flexibility for certain industrial uses to locate outside the designated principal industrial areas. Land Use Application: Agricultural industry Mining and extraction Small-scale industry Special research facilities with unusual locational requirements Exceptionally designed office, research, and light industrial parks Intent: To recognize the unique locational requirements of certain industrial uses. Staff suggests that if the Planning Commission considers Policy I-8 as one justification for the rezoning, then the petitioner should demonstrate their unique locational requirements and/or exceptional design. . D. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD The site appears to have ample space for the development to meet all requirements of the zoning ordinance. Site plan review will assure that county development standards are met. If the site is rezoned, Type C screening and buffering will be required where the site adjoins the C2 zoning district. PART III STAFF CONCLUSIONS The proposed rezoning does not conform with the policies and guidelines of the Core land use designation of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. The proposal could conform with some of the policies if exceptional site design were implemented. The policies and guidelines of the comprehensive plan provide the flexibility for certain industrial uses to locate outside the designated Principle Industrial areas. Staff suggests that if the Planning Commission considers Policy I-8 as one justification for the rezoning, then the petitioner should demonstrate their unique locational requirements and/or exceptional design. The petitioner's property lies within the scope of the improvement project area. Development on the property will be clearly visible from Plantation Road. Adjacent property between Robertson Lane and Plantation Road is owned by VDOT and will likely be improved in some phase of the Williamson Road project. Grading or clearing associated with improvements to the -_ VDOT property would increase the visibility of the petitioner's site. PREPARED BY: DAVID HOLLADAY DATE: 2/6/96 i• i• i• :;- z a - nxmxu •aaoxrox '~ ~ ~~ 3~:~ ~ ~j~ ~ ~jl 'dN00 iN3R3~tlNYYi ONISf10H ONtl > >_ > ° ~~ ( ~,~i j !'~~~ } 3 ~ia 3iY1S3 1Y3H ,iWJH JNIOl1fl8 ~Sf~OH~~dM ~ ~ ~ - ~, ~ 31~i sl ~i ~jl}y ~_3 ~ ,~ l • :i:. _ . - __-.-x• I -- ~ _ } - ~~ ~ 1 - i ~t 1-= -, ti I ,~ l ~a 1 (~_ a t - I :l N ~~ N I~~ ~.-I ~~ ~:I h ~ V -~ - !~ Y a ~ ~ - ~-3 d ~; / W ~ d ' J M,o ~ ^m ~ III ~~l ~i~ ~ I _ -- - .u o . l ` I -i---- - ----, it i it ; ___ _ i ~-- 1 I ` ~_-- --t- I it - ~ ~ i ~ ~ I l8rv .Ot ~ it 1-_ I I 1 I i I !I . ~ a~~~ 1 ~ :~a~ hY$ „ram--. -.~'. i .1 - r --- I i i i i i. i i'--•~i ----------'--• ` ~ ~ III ' 1 1~1 1 1 1 ~ _~~~•` ~ II I 1 1 1 . 1 1 1' ~., , ~ ' ~ ; r 1 1 1 1 1 1~ 1 ~ ~• 1 1 1 ;, i ,,, . , , ~I ~: II--------------- ra d9'Z9 ~-;~•----- -----= 3Iu .1 0~ j I \- .- IL. 1 1 1 ~ 1 1 °' •y ~ ` .\ vl I~ ~ '1 ' N 1 I , II ' I ~' . N ~ • `~ I 1 1 1 .+'1 •. I `~ ~ 1 1 W 1 1 Y ~ ' _ !y •~ ~ r I 1! ' I. II I /mom I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 N 1 ~ •`•\ •\ , yI ~ I 1 ~ II i tAl ~ 1 ~ `• 1 _, ~ ~ I ---------- ..o-.oc ~ I .fe ac ~ o, o II' b I ~ ' I ; i i `~____ ~• ~+~ ; i III ~, ~ ~- ~ ~ ~_ _ ~~ ~ I; N ~ I ~ ~ N" i IIIW< ~q,~ ~' I' -.--y0 r 1 I--~ --•1 Z/ i II,Jd ~1 i I v I = 1 1 1 IId=~~ ~ ~ I . I ~ ~~ Ilia -- 1 , I ; ~ i I = ~ i Ul ~.' vl 0 I ~ j i--- ' . i; 1 I~; 1 ~' I z 1 ~ ,L9'e I~ I 1. I ° ~ ~'~. I ~ 1 ~ I ~~ I~ ~ ''~ I d o ~ 1 NI • j, i v ~m d z `z I W o ••~ I I I' • 1 'II W o W-- I ~~ I ~ ~ W' 3 Z `^ ~ ~ .d I 'll W Q G J 3 ~ ~ I W W O V 6 N I •~ I ~. 1 1 N I W '' d Z > i r- v+ ~ ~ I ~ O3 ~= 3 .f9~8L j I ~1 • 'x I li'~ ~ O N W `~ I I ~~ ~ N I - I :f Z N U" _ V W Y. W I Z WI ~~ I U '` ~`~~i. O C r ZL I Z U <~ 1 iI d I I I~ C vWi r 7 Z I Y b N I OI O.I • ~1 iI, Z~W.. o .I ~ I a ~ _i ~ j ;t -__'- I ' I • ~~ -z~LL ~ a I~ c i I ~~ ~.I I a In o ~_ .n I ~ o ~ •. ;n ~ ~ < r S < Q I w ~ ' .f9 2~ 1 ~ i 1 iI ~ V N< .r t i . r t `y11~\ J 0 W> ~~. / n~ N ~ ~ c W ~ d I ~ I J I p1 I II :aao~ a I I 54.88' , _ .---"~~ '^,~ j II - O V ` ~ 1 ,° I I , - I O ~ - I 1 ,~ ~ _ MNIDtiI/~'I.LNf1C0 >>IONHOli ~ ~ p S ~~ °~~s F~ i ~ji {R ^ ~ ~s~ N011`ddOdi=lO~ dWOH a m a ~ Y ~~ d1sRt6R 6~L: ~5t3td II7iF? ~_~itta E:ifs NYId 1d30N00 __ ~ ~ ~ K ~ ~ ~~ ~ _; ;~ D ~. b ~ :? ~' ~~~ ~ Iggr ~;~ ~ ~;~ Y ~ ~ 3 gl~ 4~ g ~ ~ ~e ~ 6 ~ ~^~ ~~ .~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ - I-- -~- ~ - ~, /,'i~1,OS -~ i~------ 3ild 6'7/77 r~ l - rT~'-1-l-rf - - - ~~ I ~ ~i~" I I I~I I F ji,! I ( I 1 I l (~, ( _~ ~ a a I `~hh ~I I L11~ ~ • I I ~ _ - - ,,-~ .~. ': i ~_~ d ~ ~ - ~` ~ +i I x I I ~ - I ~~ .~~~ ~k ~ ~ a ~ ~ I I t I ~~@ -~ a~ 9~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~II II ~ ~ _J tt ~i~`~~ ~~_~~~ ~ 81 I ~~~# I I I ~ ~ ~ 3~~~e _ ~i ~ ;r ~~~R~ ~~~~~b ~- ~ ~ ± I ~ ~ ~ I I I ~~ r ~~ ~ , I~f si ~_ ~Q ~g_ ~ _ ~~ ~ ~ tb 1 f I. ~ to i Irr ly ~~ ± ~ I '~ I I ~~ I 1 I I I I I I~I! I ~I III I ~ I I i~ U I I I ~ ~li gl ~~I i ~I IrI lo. 'I~~I m ti ,;I ~ ~I W =1~ I I ~ ~ I =y , ,~~,~ i 1, ~~~~o I 3 ~I Imo ~~,~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~a o~ ~+ g 0 u~ U O~ ~ h i ~~~ ~, ~o~, ~\ ~ _ ~ ~P~ly~ P, _ ~ \ ` - ~' .. .~ ^[~ L~ ~ i 1~1 i7 .• s ~~ ~~ ~ ~ % / ~ ~ / t~.s:'~ / ~ / / a ~ ~j~ '~_ ~ ~ E ~ ~ h ~~ 3 ~i~ ~ g bit ~ ~ ~ Q d 8 ~~~ 3 >1 a a~ o~ ~ = ~~ ~ r ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~c R~ ~ `~~- ~ ~~ ono a ~'~'~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~~: ~~ ~ i i E !~ g~ g~ i i ~ a~ 6 i~ 3~ ~ ~~ ~a. - ~~~~¢ ~~ ~ ~T ~ ~t~~~~~ r ~ LL ~ ~ ~ ~~ r ~ N ~ v-.~ G ~~i ~~~ ~ ~_. -~ ~:. a ~. i 6 5~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~ I. • COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 5201 Bernard_Dr. P.O. Box 29800- Roanoke, VA 24018 (510` 772-2068 FAX (5401 772-21 08 For staf fuse on/y v' ~..~ date receivedi n received b ,f(~~ Y- ~lL`c;' applicatior7,f ~ ~ ~ll ?CiEZ~+ date' )L 1_~ / Tj s~gd: J~ placards is BOS dater ~i ~ J~ ~ Case Number: .~ Check type of application filed (check all that apply): ® REZONING ^ SPECIAL USE ^VARIANCE Applicant's name: Balzer and Associates, Inc., ~ Phone: 772-9580 Address: 1 208 Corporate Circle ATTN: Pat Miley Zip Code: 2401 8 Roanoke VA Owner's name: HCMF Corporation Phone: 774-4263 Address: Attn: David Branch Zip Code: 4965 Colonnade Drive, Suite 200, Roanoke VA Q _ a Location of property: Tax Map Number: 27.1 1 -01 -08 7605 Robertson Lane Magisterial District: Hollins Community Planning Area: peters Creek Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: C2 - General Commercial District 1.07 acres Existing Land Use: Vacant 46.609 sq.ft. Proposed Zoning: I-1 Industrial District Forsraff use only Proposed Land Use: use Type: Central offices and warehouse for Pharm~eutical u lies ............................ Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES x NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for ti^,=_ requested Use Type? YES x NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES x NO Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in orde- to: Is the application completes Please check if encicsed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE I R/s V Consultation x Application x Justification vIISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v x 8 1 /2" x 1 i" concept plan x '? Metes and 'rounds description x >:r• Water and sewer application ws v Application fee ><~ Proffers, if applicable =t Adjoining property owners l hereby certify that l am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowle ge ar/d consent of the owner. _ ~; . - ~. Owner's Signature: Ct~ _-'i~ _~ ~~ ~~ ' - > ~ - For Staff Use On/y: Case Number .... _ "Applicant • ~. • Balzer and Associates, Inc.- --3 The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. The requested rezoning furthers the purpose of the Zoning Ordinance in that it will provide for adequate light, air, ,convenience of access, and safety from fire,~flood, and other dangers; it will not cause congestion in the public streets; will not: adversely affect the appearance of the community; will not encroach upon historic (buildings or areas; and will add minimal traffic to the existing streets. The rezoning will further the purpose of the I-1rzoLe^in that it^c~~ ideal for the less intensive dis~ribution censer/o~~l~= use prcp.,..~~, being free from flooding, having adequate sewer and water available, and• access- to Pl antai-i nn Road.-- '-- Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines .and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. Although the site is designated as Core in the Comprehensive Plan, it is in close proximity to the Principal Industrial designation. While the Comprehensive Plan encourages the development of industrial sites within Principal Industrial areas, it also acknowledges that small industries should be permitted, to a limited extent, outside of these areas. The site is not desirable for general commercial purposes as it is not highly visible from a major road. Most of the allo:aable commercial uses would generate far more traffic than the proposed use. The site is not central to a population concentration. Residential uses, which are encouraged in the Core land use designation, are not allowed in the C-2 zone. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the ad;•oining properties, and the surrcunding area, as well as the impacts on public services anc facilities, including v~~a ter/se~r~er, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. If the rezoning request is granted, the site will be developed as an office/distribution center facility to serve HCMF properties. There .will be minimal impact on public sewer and water (the site will require only normal residential service). In addition to employee-traffic-in and out of the site,-there will be approximately t:oo round trips per day of a van type truck.to pickup,and deliver to HCMF properties, and approximately 2-3 supply truck deliveries. The site~is not" designed to handle tractor trailers or other large delivery vehicles. There will be no impact to schools and parks. Fire/rescue will be adequately addressed. _ .; ~ I. ~ ~ - ~~~ ~ Q ~ is ,-r . ~ J ~ ~~ ,. '~ cD • ' ~' r . - ~aP . ~ ~ ~' ~ / ~ - ~ ; -. ~ ~ ~ ! ! ~ ~ ~ i ~: 4 ~ i ~ .~~ o :,11 ~: ~ ~{ \~• ~ ~ \\ _y- :~ \ ~'_ m o _ ,t' `-~ ~ / ~. ` 1 ,_. ._-, -` i !~ f ` ~O ~`-~ . 1 ~ ~ I ~ /' \ ~ '~ i ,i ~ - _ ~ /, ~ ~\~ .~ / l f } ~~ ~ ~. a /~' ~ c - . \, - . O. ~ J f/ I ' J ~ ~ ~ ~~ i \~ / l ~~ ~ Q _ \ O ` i ~~ ~~ tea; C e' PP ~ ~~ . ~~.~ ~ ~ a / ~~ ~ ~~. ~ is ~2- F~ `t~~ i ~ ~ ~ ~, / ~ ~ 3 P ~ ~ is p ~' ~ a\ ~9 `.L ~p9 -~.9 - \ ~ ..--- . ~ ~ ~ ~ ; / 'OAT ~ ~ `~\ 2 \. a ~~ ._ .- //\\ ~ ~ Q 6 2oc s ' . \ _ -- -~ ~ - - -. - -~ o ~~. . ~ ~ `' I n\ \ 2 _ . .\~~ ~aa a~ 95 l t 3 _ •, v-3 K ~- _ _ -Ni •- n ~ ~ ;'\ _ i •~ " `' 4 :(f' n i •a '-- '~i ,, ~ _ _ _ ~~ • •. ' -r .. ' ^..' ~ tl.-" ~~. ~XI' sec ~E ur ~O E•i^~.,, ~Q C" /; --~ °a ~ _ /vU~ .iQ4-v AFC - - .. prr ~ ROt~rrY`~ < ~c !pY • yf ,` ~ ._. _._. __ _ ~_,r`^~4-0~•--.-•-_ /~~~° _3UCK! ~ 4o-C .C~/~ - '- F~~ ~~' \ ~y •~~_v ,_'<t~.tG •\ -°l°'~' \\\ - ~ ~ is ELI/- ~ ~~~{ Q~ / ~ • a ~ _ _ r ~ v.4 '~% ~ (y ~ ~ '~ ~-. _ ~ + ~~ . y~ 9 -rt3'rI„ ~FeS/.?"l`O,Q P E< <' ~ ~ = - 1 'a~ 1i >~"`~ • i ~ ~t A~?~,~.. 'ii ~vY,. ~', %p~ ~~ ~ ~ '< _.Y.Gg.?Cy~``~-T. ~ ~ ~~fii ,;`'~'~ . :: ~ 4,~'y \ :;,~ ~/~` ~ ~~ .~ .~ RRY.ar/ f` Ti r ` a r ~~. - ..~ - '' " -CL.1~ P'~ '~ . ~ • Tr tiCy ~ ~ .rclGn~ rP~'` \ ~~~ :1' `r'te °~' . \ _ •_ .~ ~~~ -~~>`j`~~~ ij r 7\ ,.Pik. _~5<(/ ~o ~'~F° .f _~~ ~ f° __ •os..~ .: _~~.s/_~ ,,;vj •CF F.{jT ~':~~."'._: E.;\ +'v\. ! '~:' %~~-r lCi \ ~ ~l ~"~ G~ ye-.'•' J~ / _ ~ _/¢ ".~A_ -`Y rC ~ .~~~ ~•\ ,~,~yf.a:,:C~E'X$ .`O J' _ ?~,/ v~_ =`~''{ ~ •~ S~Q~i _ v~ya ~~ ->G ~ 'c.; .off, •~±G ~j9D i'~7 `` •`~`~.~ .. >i '•~ -• `~•~.~,-~~ O!Ol-~~%K O''rn ~niF"'`{ _" -~i ~'~ O-9 `"r. ~r7`20 ~ ~~',~~_' _ \-, :~" G ~n \~C p~~r; ~~ .+~,. ~Z~ ~ C{ , cCY'< X1.5 ~,,:;~ ;;L~.1y.~~ •-,~rc0 ~ ~ -•. ~ ~ _r~:y5_ < . ANG~~f ~~7 3t,~1'`.,s'@`•t ~s~v~~~°~~ MAC ~ f~'!Co.~~~ >.'3' .a~..r ~° ~~"'"' °~/ •i~ ~na~~_~ 9n~ Ya-~,~y`~ ~ /' .i' ~Cf ~~' > ~ ~',, c O ar^~~"~ ~~C~~ ` ~ri P• YC~ ( / ~.~tiHrf{ t~ ~c~ .> ? -J ~'ti / ^ 2l ~~ !~~ .. _ i -~`~/ 1 ' o va ~':P?:~ i; ~C~"~ :J n;E ~~: o ac:`~~ra _ o, ~ _.3' c r~ y ~~ ~~ \ c -•'C``'i ~? 'rx:° •~ y~ \\ , ate, `'.ir•J ~~.<~ ~/ ;C vC1i ~ - ; _ _ a ,r.cerE£ ~ x c~..-- PC ~ 1 StvN~~ - 'O \ 3 a,f~ ~` -~~ _- ~- •~~ia _v~{'~ •-.--.r.~:i ~w~~a21' T/ p`a./~. ,'.'.,•~„~• r~,~(`~~ ~r it~Go~'.. I`.~!EnCeA~wGe1_. -N+"_ \09`Pt •-_ VI \:`•e• _ - ''• •0 ~ L!-/_• }KL `a~ •~F%~/~~~°•`ie•'..:.y~~ W.Rx E'.~~i; -'`:-!%~'~G^•_ -~\.J>.:.. _-ZaM~+wM ".__.i-----~c~/=NA~%-/ ~ ~ ..,• -a AR OR \~ „` .Y..5~~-(~vj ~r/wvi%~.~ ~ •S`Sj'.~ORR~rM~ _.-- <_ ~5.... _ \ < v-~~ < f_ q J ~/ -~~ _-` ^l ~~`~ __ =j/.~~ E=q '' Ji ~''~%'~ ~C .- ~<'SS f`f C'\d-o '\-r `A:A=Z~ca`~ '•': t'~~• <~~l~j j"~•• - ~!.Y'~~~_~' r ~vs~a `%'i '/``~' /~^up`•~ ~ \~~~ ~ > r/Z ~c^ J G : ~~ _-. ` '_ ~4,rn- .. S?'JI _.<~ C . - :i. '~.ee Rv:.E \~. ` ~-.r`Y'S• ~/ E~SS .G~ ?, au u. - . __ ~cs_. ~ __•~ -~_C . r.... ~ __- ... ._ _ ~ ~ Li ~_.. ~~J ,r: _ > % i ?.. ~` ^ "~: -tiV~U' .: P 3 v'S` 07 `. ^ .. _ . ~. .t ~C~~-°/ .9~ C.. ~J :.~" i = • {~,~c' ~+C'. ~.J -=:'<S~'' •,it7J ~_ --' •/ ~RV~i ` -_- _'. i ~ :.~ y~\ 4 ~^"'CfY .% i.-`0~;•4 ~ .S c_ `\ "~~.-1 .-•' ~>!.-o i '~ ~4a-E.iJ fir' o' _^,.tON ~,G ., :?°~=i--~ ~~~ _ ~.~\ ~.•J~ Jo`~ `. ~`. ' -~\~•'~t ~S": a.;~ C a~ti ~qk C' ~/~=.V > ~c-~,, .p ,.c._c l~rt = ~ ._ _-- •~~~-` - _~0 w r•~~C.; ~ f-vr'k~-- 4.: po~~ ,.~J ;S`ri` ~~ r a~0.e ~'\ `~- q%::/ ~. ii /'/ _ ~ 1 -. 1• r g -.c- ~ , C' - -7 ~. -J.•~ cca:;,., 0 8•rrdv Y \9G/ /~/ I; •C`rar57i_r. SCr_0~5\-: ~ -' = ".n J_ ~'~f ~ ~1 ~n`''.~f. S.'.-' ` -q// ti5~- -^~ t .. _ 'c~J+ ~~ r C,'.r.,l`~TcCyrt~'`~~o ~ - ~i:-•~:.:_:•- C~ ~~ •~-~- 4D a .4?.,`~C~ /:.lam ~ -: ~ ~ ~,C~a~v..CCD~-ts~"~ ~ ~-~ ~O:~r>J( `- '. ~-~'% 3~ti }+. . H~ `~ • \ - r ~ '. i `/,• }~P ~~°- ~¢ ~ / ~~ 1~ \ ` ~' - ~ • -f -`- -•- O• a.cc ~: RO--:LSAN Axia{ x. ~ C . a -' -jJ :: _~9~v=~ /' ~. .S~ORiN VVr:CETw•+' .: c;:~'.~~ ``r' T,arRi~::~r_. --."1 _\_ _.~;, ~'~ C%:`~'.?-~~~-. ~~"_~-~ CIR -- - _ _ ' ,i^ -~-~' '/~. ~ •~ Ccw iFFC t __ _ '~~<`.<o ~, `.P ,.~iEN'~i_' - , D \, -; ~ /\`~ ^~ ` '{ ? •_ ~ n~ E~r7n01~--V •. O~IA },~ ~ o _- - ---~ _ ~~ /' ~ ~ ,•~ T,R: r •,a v~ .:^~ss ,~~~. ~~ 4`< ~ l __ a ._ ~ ..i'y=-Jn ~ ~-~-~~ a >' ' C> oRU„oc° ~ \~.____ / / ;,a.vS t ~.NC '...-Yt.._. v 7 :~l_~.r :: •;\~- ,' / 'C,7 / Y - n '~ ~ ~Z -R-. .,- _ ~/ C ~~~P^t.v.cR, ~- .• ._ - .o ~,, ~'~/MAIL \<~ QG-~:J .^~ •_ w~;,r ro~~q 7 C` ,•!:: 1{ n 5'O ~° 7 2201_" i ^ ~_ J ~~ rrv•Sa`J E„~toi a•..`:c~~.'/~l?l ~~i~i O,o (' :'~~\. . E-1 G M ~ ~IICIN lTY l0 SG/~L-= MA MAR-19-96 TUE 10 17 HCMF ACT-OPPS-DP FAX N0. 817039514109 P. 02/02 °j;,=~ Owners proffer--the following conditions: .- Uses on ~~he proper_ty shall be those in the .C-1 I;nc7L~str~.al District, excluding the following: a. Automobile Repair Services b. Landfill, Rubble c. Recycling Centers and Stations d, Transportation Terminal e. Truck Terminal f . Amateur Rad? 0 7'owex q. ~3roadcasting Tower t;. Parking Facilities ;.. Commercial Indoor Sports and Recreation j. Truck Stop }:.. Resource Extraction 1.. Transfer Station m, Aviation f'aci],ities ~ Private '~ . R'h~~ site will be developed in substantial conformity wz.th the concept plan prepared by Salaer and lyssociates, znc., dated December 2~., 1995. . `t'hc: building will be developed in substantial conformity with the a.rcritectura.l rendering prepared by Balzer anc:~ Associates, Inc. dated k'ebxuary 29, 1.996. ~, The landscaping along the length of the front of the building wi.11 be twice the density as that requa.r.ed bra the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. °;~, 'T'here will be no access to the property fr_o~~ 1,t1a /~``~/ ,avenue . '•.~C;!1F~' Corporation Date ~{' 4 r \~"~' \ MOR7H BURUN ~~' `~~? ®~.T. ~ 2 ~f~ ~'-+yi',~ r r E~; ~ . ~~ G£=fT$ P?~. o•~ _ ~-" `ay=e( ~ ~'A-` -~ ~~ ~~~~Oiy s you ~ n7.T8f O - _ - .~~J 7~:(i`Q_~IYOe .. .. - iMn. ° v,, D,o~P or"` .rtP~ / EM _ - g ~ c~ / y viJA ~ o°O"~, e° o~'Qr~ fZBT 'a~,,~~,rt.l:i ~y~ °~.~-..._./~. ~ ~IAN~R~ ~ ~ V,~6°~r~2,~N~L ~ ~%Pb~~S('~J p~~Mri'r' l ~~'.,~~~ IRl"~; gyp` 2•~ `urn7j,. `1" py r p.f+hg1 w~ s r! t.,,G~ ~bE~' ~:4':M1r ~ ~ C 9 a:3:~[SC<aw CV Q Kq°rvl[iv ~ F/° Z`r ;~:~'•~J~ ~ ~ r. ^ ~/ /rte l - xoRiH ~. o ~ 763.11 76134 ' I I 21 ~ 270AC ' 20 ~ ~ \ 2.3Sac d O° C`°V°IP \ \ p/g \ 0~°ipt ~ ~0~ ~ °v ~ c' ~ \ \ ~ 19 O \ \ ~ / 3.66.c `7 22 7610 ~ ~ ~. p 3.OpAc G~ or GI s ~ S L ~ ~~ e~ ~'~ t 7603 i of A sJ ~ ~~ 16 :~ O g ~ 15L 1528 15'6 ~ _ 8 ~~ ~ r L .Tx 1 ) \ `• ~.V\O Pve 1<i~~ 23.1 _~ ~ M 14 0 0 'c °Oa ~s is a t42i o °o- ~ ~ a0f.y OS 1~~ \ C Sa 9 I 1a~ ~ Ito r"' ~ ~ +~ r ~ V ~~ Sup j ~~'^~ ''~ .. .p ~ 10 '. • ~ J .2 'O _ .9 ~ N~ 5 ' 9 O ~ s 3 ' '` '~ \ ' ~ ~ ~ 7:.J - L - may ~ fit S ~tS~ ~ ~ 13 G1. ` pO C, 7 ' LT6SC ~ O 9 - ~'. 5 • ° _ 12 15'0 , ? r ~ a / ~:''~ ~ i...*....~ 13 i 2 . ~ 5J ~ r .a - / ~' 1~~r _ 3 _ - ~~ / 1~a _y 535 1~ / 1 a 1 _ .~i .r'' 1ST 7J I ' 4 ~ S Y ~~ / \ ~ 1 15rr ~S r 0 C-2 TO I-1 HCMF CORP, •~ ~~ * DE?ARTh1Er~1T OF PLP.~~NI\G 27. 1 l -1- 8 \~ ,~ AND ZONING l ~ - AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MARCH 26, 1996 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 1.07-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED 7605 ROBERTSON LANE (TAX MAP NO. 27.11-1-8) IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF I-1 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF HCMF CORP. WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on January 23, 1996, and the second reading and public hearing were held March 26, 1996; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on February 6, 1996 and March 5, 1996; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 1.07 acres, as described herein, and located 7605 Robertson Lane (Tax Map Number 27.11-1-8) in the Hollins Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District, to the zoning classification of I-1, Industrial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of HCMF Corp. 3. That the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts: (1) Uses on the property shall be those allowed in the I-1 \~~~ Industrial District, excluding the following: (a) automobile V repair services; (b) landfill, rubble; (c) recycling centers and stations; (d) transportation terminal; (e) truck terminal; (f) amateur radio tower; (g) broadcasting tower; (h) parking facilities; (i) commercial indoor sports and recreation; (j) truck stop; (k) resource extraction; (1) transfer station; (m) aviation facilities, private. (2) The site will be developed in substantial conformity with the concept plan prepared by Balzer and Associates, Inc., dated December 21, 1995. (3) The building will be developed in substantial conformity with the architectural rendering prepared by Balzer & Associates, dated February 29, 1996. (4) The landscaping along the length of the front of the building will be twice the density as that required by the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. (5) There will be no access from Lula Avenue. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Beginning at a point in the center of a 30 foot road, shown as "B" on plat, said point located N. 22 deg. 45' W. 435.7 feet along center of road from the west side of U. S. Route 11; thence along center of 30 foot road, N. 22 deg. 45' W. 295.0 feet to a stake at "C" on line of Dr. Frank S. Cooper property; thence with Cooper line, N. 61 deg. 04' E. 173.5 feet to a point at "D"; thence still with Cooper line, S. 22 deg. 23' E. 313.8 feet to an iron at "E", corner to parcel No. 3-B; thence with line of same, S. 67 deg. 15' W. passing an iron on east side of the 30 foot road at 155.7 feet, in all 170.7 feet to the Beginning, containing 1.20 acres, and being Parcel No. 3-A as shown in detail on plat prepared by T. P. Parker, SCE, dated July 1946. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, . ~,,, ''~ and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. zoning.hcmf V~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 26, 1996 ORDINANCE 032695-12 AUTHORIZING THE VACATION OF A 10 FOOT PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT LOCATED ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE OF LOT 9, SECTION 1, COUNTRY HILLS, PLAT BOOR 9, PAGE 65, IN THE WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, by subdivision plat entitled "Map of Section 1, COUNTRY HILLS", dated February 1, 1976, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Plat Book 9, page 65, T.P. and Christine Y. Parker dedicated certain public easements, including a public utility easement along the northern property line of Lot 9; and, WHEREAS, the petitioners, Paul A. Reburn and Cynthia W. Reburn, husband and wife, are the owners of Lot 9, Section 1, Country Hills; and, WHEREAS, a recent survey of said property reflects that a new addition to the residential dwelling located thereon encroaches upon the south side of the existing 10' public utility easement; and, WHEREAS, the petitioners have requested that said public utility easement be vacated by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, pursuant to Section 15.1-482 (b) of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), which requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, WHEREAS, there being no objection raised by the appropriate public utility companies entitled to use the subject easement; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by Section 15.1-431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and a first reading of this ordinance was held on March 12, 1996; and the public hearing and second reading of this ordinance was held on March 26, 1996. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the public utility easement, being ten feet (10') in width and extending approximately 237 feet in length, along the northern property line of Lot 9, Section 1, Country Hills, in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, as shown on the subdivision plat entitled "Map of Section 1, COUNTRY HILLS", dated February 1, 1976, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 9, page 65, and as further shown on the Exhibit attached hereto, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to Section 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and, 2. That, as a condition to the adoption of this ordinance, all costs and expenses associated herewith, including but not limited to publication costs, survey costs and recordation of documents, shall be the responsibility of the petitioners, Paul A. Reburn and Cynthia W. Reburn, or their successors or assigns; and, 3. That the Department of Engineering and Inspections shall record a certified copy of this ordinance with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, and the recordation costs shall be payable by the petitioners. 2 4. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~• Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 3 ~ _ ~~~ CY;N~ • ~ .z_~. ~ ~~~ gate ~,~. ~: - I .<rn ' w~ ~ ~~ I - -- -.. ' ~° VI CINI T Y 11~IAP~ ~. _ 1\ " ~ , \ e .~ \ ~O ~P~ I ~F~ ~' RE f~E ~ ~~P9a~ $co~ Z.r/ 59 ' s4 ~ 7o ANA ;~ la9o (~ ~g/N~~ f~ $x.02 - '~ .t3~. I BADE. SAP _ 9 , - ~z.~3' i ?go~f'3 a ~ I N fo, Pu E. ~ _=. ~ ~ . / ~ . ~ EX i S TivG 1 ~ .YOGrSE o` ~` .' VACATED o~ ~ ~G• ~ ~ ~ ~ .: ..4 ORES `. , ~ .` _y. _ : _ . ~~ o ~ S ?~ ~9 .. o ~.~~ 90 . u ~ '\ `~\ 9-G _=LYE ~ ~~OAGE: ~~~~ J J~ . ~ ~ b x ~. U,, pro. a a N vr` ~- _ cs, r ~- -, i _ v. ~'o °a ~ N V1 tT~ ~ `\~ ~ b Z ~- ~% 5 }~'~ '~ ; . / Q A,. ~5 ~°: p O~ ~,~ \ o . ~ ~~ 1 ~D~~a1~~~ -~ _ 5~c, Q~Z =~ . ~ . ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ O' ~ Z .~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~9 . '~ \ .~ ~ ~ -~. R OANOKE COUNTY ENGINEERING & INSPECTIONS DEPAP,T-1KE'NT VACATE A 10 FOOT PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT LOCATED ALONG T$$ NORTH PROPERTY LINE OF LOT 9, .SECTION I COUNTRY HILLS ACTION # ITEM NUMBER V '"` AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 26, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Request to vacate a 10 foot Public Utility Easement located along the north property line of Lot 9, Section 1 Country Hills, recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 65 and located in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The petitioners, Mr. Paul A. Reburn and Ms. Cynthia W. Reburn, are requesting that the Board of Supervisors vacate the 10 foot Public Utility Easement. BACKGROUND: The petitioners, Mr. Paul A. Reburn and Ms. Cynthia W. Reburn, are the owners of Lot 9, Section 1 Country Hills, recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 65, located in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. The easement vacation is necessary because a general contractor, retained by the petitioners to construct a "New Addition," inadvertently protruded one foot into the existing easement (shown on the attached survey). Also, the petitioners had to adjust the existing north property line, adjacent to the existing Public Utility Easement, for compliance with the side yard setback requirements as established by Roanoke County's Zoning Ordinance. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Mr. Paul A. Reburn and Ms. Cynthia W. Reburn, are requesting that the Board of Supervisors vacate the 10 foot Public Utility Easement. County staff received no objections to the vacation from the applicable public utility companies. 1 f V-~ Therefore, Roanoke County is requesting that the described Public Utility Easement be vacated in accordance with Chapter 11, Title 15.1-482(b), Code of Virginia 1950, as amended, by the adoption of the attached ordinance. First reading of the proposed Ordinance was held on March 12, 1996; A public hearing and second reading is scheduled to be held on March 26, 1996. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: County staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt the proposed Ordinance to vacate the referenced Public Utility Easement. B TTED BY: APPROVED BY: rriold Covey, Directo Elmer C. Hodge of Engineering & Ins ections County Administrator ------------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved Denied Received Referred To Motion by: Eddy Harrison Johnson Minnix Nickens pc: Paul Mahoney, County Attorney 2 - ~ ~~~ - NORTH ~F~o~ R ~ fEE ~ ~ ~t~P9a ~ ~ f0~ PU. ~ ~~,D \ . ~3 ~ ~ - EXi S TivG i ~~ i~ ~ / "~ .Z ~ ~~ _ P.U.E TO BE ~ - ~ Z o` ~, .- ~ VACATED - _ a~ ~ ~~ - \ \ . . / A ~G• ~ ~ ~ . .ACRES ~ . oo ~~~ ,,. .- - . ~ - _ O, 11 ~o T ````~ ~' ~Q~ ~~~ ~ 8 ~ O s~~ . , i9 ~ y ~ o~ X90.. ~ ~ ~~ ~. -~~~ Z - ~~ s ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~\ ~ .~ ~ ~ -•. ROANOKE COUNTY VACATE A 10 FOOT PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT ENGINEERING & LOCATED ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE OF INSPECTIONS DEPAP.T~1fENT LOT 9, SECTION I COUNTRY HILLS ~~ ~- `~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 26, 1996 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE VACATION OF A 10 FOOT PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT LOCATED ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE OF LOT 9, SECTION 1, COUNTRY HILLS, PLAT BOOK 9, PAGE 65, IN THE WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, by subdivision plat entitled "Map of Section 1, COUNTRY HILLS", dated February 1, 1976, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Plat Book 9, page 65, T.P. and Christine Y. Parker dedicated certain public easements, including a public utility easement along the northern property line of Lot 9; and, WHEREAS, the petitioners, Paul A. Reburn and Cynthia W. Reburn, husband and wife, are the owners of Lot 9, Section 1, Country Hills; and, WHEREAS, a recent survey of said property reflects that a new addition to the residential dwelling located thereon encroaches upon the south side of the existing 10' public utility easement; and, WHEREAS, the petitioners have requested that said public utility easement be vacated by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, pursuant to Section 15.1-482(b) of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), which requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, WHEREAS, there being no objection raised by the appropriate public utility companies entitled to use the subject easement; and, v-y WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by Section 15.1-431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and a first reading of this ordinance was held on March 12, 1996; and the public hearing and second reading of this ordinance was held on March 26, 1996. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the public utility easement, being ten feet (10') in width and extending approximately 237 feet in length, along the northern property line of Lot 9, Section 1, Country Hills, in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, as shown on the subdivision plat entitled "Map of Section 1, COUNTRY HILLS", dated February 1, 1976, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 9, page 65, and as further shown on the Exhibit attached hereto, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to Section 15.1-482(b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and, 2. That, as a condition to the adoption of this ordinance, all costs and expenses associated herewith, including but not limited to publication costs, survey costs and recordation of documents, shall be the responsibility of the petitioners, Paul A. Reburn and Cynthia W. Reburn, or their successors or assigns; and, 3. That the Department of Engineering and Inspections shall record a certified copy of this ordinance with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, and the recordation costs shall be payable by the petitioners. 2 • ~ ` y ~~ 4. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. 3 f O~ ROANp,~~ h A 2 ~ J Is? 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (540) 772-2004 Mr. Thomas A. Darnall 1010 Halliahurst Avenue Vinton, VA 24179 Dear Mr. Darnall: March 29, 1996 (540) 772-2005 The members of the Board of Supervisors wish to express their sincere appreciation for your previous service to the Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals. Citizens so responsive to the needs of their community and willing to give of themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce. I am pleased to inform you that, at their meeting held on Tuesday, March 26, 1996, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to reappoint you as a member of the Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals for another four year term. Your new term will expire on January 22, 2000. State law requires that you take an oath Clerk of the Roanoke County Circuit Court. administered rior to your participation on telephone Steven A. McGraw, at 387-6205, to oath administered, and he has asked that you b you. of office before the This oath must be this Board. Please arrange to have the ring this letter with State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, or appointed to any public body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act. Your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflict of Interest Act. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. S Bob J n on, Chairman Roanoke ounty Board of Supervisors BIJ/bj h Enclosures cc: James E. Bowles, Acting Building Commissioner C~aix~#~ ~~ ~.a~~tx~o~~e P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (540) 772-2193 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BOB L. JOHNSON, CHAIRMAN HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS, VICE-CHAIRMAN VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FENTON F. "SPIKE" HARRISON. JR. CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ® Paper O~ ROANp,~~ ti z ,7 ~ z ~J ' a 1 38 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (540) 772-2004 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (540) 772-2193 March 28, 1996 Dr. Michael Nevling Colonial Presbyterian Church 3550 Poplar Drive, SW Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Dr. Nevling: 1540)772-2005 On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, I would like to thank you for offering the invocation at our meeting on Tuesday, March 26, 1996. We believe it is most important to ask for divine guidance at these meetings and the Board is very grateful for your contribution. us. Thank you again for sharing your time and your words with With kindea`f regards, Bob L. lJohu~~~, Chairman Roanoke~Co Board of Supervisors C~aixxt#~ ~f ~ ~~~o~~P BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BOB L. JOHNSON, CHAIRMAN HOWNS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS, VICE-CHAIRMAN VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FENTON F. "SPIKE' HARRISON. JR CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ®R«.y~a Pam _~ o~ ROANp,I,~ a ti ~ A z c~ 1838 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE MARY H. ALLEN, CMC ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 CLERK TO THE BOARD (703) 772-2005 FAX (703) 772-2193 March 27, 1996 Mr. Jason B. Perdue 2004 June Drive Roanoke, VA 24019 Dear Mr. Perdue: BRENDA J. HOLTON DEPUTY CLERK At their regular meeting on Tuesday, March 26, 1996, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved the request of the Glen Cove Elementary School PTA for a Raffle Permit. The raffle will be conducted on May 18, 1996. The fee has been paid and your receipt is enclosed. You may consider this letter to be your permit, and I suggest it be displayed on the premises where the raffles are to be conducted. The State Code provides that raffle and bingo permits be issued on a calendar-year basis; however, because of recent legislative changes, this permit is only valid until June 30, 1996. The new State legislation, effective July 1, 1996, vested the Charitable Gaming Commission with control of all charitable gaming in the Commonwealth, and repealed the authority for the County's current ordinance regulating bingo and raffles. After July 1, 1996, you can contact the Commissioner of Revenue's office to receive any information they may have about applying for raffle and bingo permits under the new legislation. If I may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 772-2003. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures cc: Commissioner of the Revenue Commonwealth Attorney County Treasurer ® Recycled Paper . - o~ ROANp,1,~ , ,~ p Z L7 1838 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE MARY H. ALLEN, CMC ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 CLERK TO THE BOARD (703) 772-2005 FAX (703) 772-2193 March 27, 1996 Mr. Jack Bingham Route 4, Box 82 Vinton, VA 24179 Dear Mr. Bingham: BRENDA J. HOLTON DEPUTY CLERK At their regular meeting on Tuesday, March 26, 1996, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved the request of the Vinton Moose Lodge #1121 for a Bingo Permit for calendar year 1996, effective through June 30, 1996. The bingo games will be conducted at the location and on the dates specified in your application. The fee has been paid and your receipt is enclosed. You may consider this letter to be your permit, and I suggest it be displayed on the premises where the bingo games are to be conducted. The State Code provides that raffle and bingo permits be issued on a calendar-year basis; however, because of recent legislative changes, this permit is only valid until June 30, 1996. The new State legislation, effective July 1, 1996, vested the Charitable Gaming Commission with control of all charitable gaming in the Commonwealth, and repealed the authority for the County's current ordinance regulating bingo and raffles. After July 1, 1996, you can contact the Commissioner of Revenue's office to receive any information they may have about applying for raffle and bingo permits under the new legislation. If I may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 772-2003. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures cc: Commissioner of the Revenue Commonwealth Attorney County Treasurer ®~ Re~yded Paper O~ ROANp~~ ~ ti ~ p 1838 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE MARY H. ALLEN, C.MC ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 CLERK TO THE BOARD (703) 772-2005 FA (7032 772-2 1 9 3 Marc 27, 1996 Ms. Margaret D. Palmieri Business Manager North Cross School 4254 Colonial Avenue, SW Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Ms. Palmieri: BRENDA J. HOLTON DEPUTY CLERK At their regular meeting on Tuesday, March 26, 1996, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved the request of North Cross School for a Raffle Permit. The raffle will be conducted on May 11, 1996. The fee has been paid and your receipt is enclosed. You may consider this letter to be your permit, and I suggest it be displayed on the premises where the raffles are to be conducted. The State Code provides that raffle and bingo permits be issued on a calendar-year basis; however, because of recent legislative changes, this permit is only valid until June 30, 1996. The new State legislation, effective July 1, 1996, vested the Charitable Gaming Commission with control of all charitable gaming in the Commonwealth, and repealed the authority for the County's current ordinance regulating bingo and raffles. After July 1, 1996, you can contact the Commissioner of Revenue's office to receive any information they may have about applying .for raffle and bingo permits under the new legislation. If I may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 772-2003. Sincerely, irYL.Gt'.ii~~ ~ • CSC Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures cc: Commissioner of the Revenue Commonwealth Attorney County Treasurer ® Recycled paper V .' _ . 'V ~ ~•'q ~, V1 3 ~ V C/7 ° -o U CO {~. y ~ ~ L U 'J y ~ o °~ c o ~ eCa a~ 'C H . C O ~ O CQ ~ ~ U ~ O C 6~ C ~ c~ ~ 'O O I: bC O W ~ _ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'O "~ O O ..C E"i m0 -fl U O v N ~ C O C v~ ~ o o ~ ~ ~ a O ...n ~ m . ~ c ~. U o ~ 3 ~ o o f L ° a ~ s a. ... ~ ~ s ~ a ~ a :¢ c ° x ~ ~ c L 5 ,D ~ o ~ .° k ~ ~ c ° w o` ~ ~ a Q ea F" ~ _ ~ ~; ° ~+ ~'' an ~ C a ¢ o c .y ~ ~ ~ ~ S -- ' . o . ~ M M ~ O Vl C ~ y ~ C N a wl Q\ ~i rl C O ~ ~ R .-i ~ v cC O ~ ~ V • ~ ~p d L y ~ C~ ~ V Q~ ~" "p c~ 0 xy m w ~~ ~ ~ x ~ w i . ~, _ •~ ~ O r o ~ ~ ~ O~ c o O ~° . i„ ~ n m.~ a5 c~ d m ~ $ U o v~ m~ D a Q d ~ d a. v~ ,Ct~ ~ .~ ~ ~o o,~~ .~ c~ .. C~ ~~~ y c,~U L a I, ~ M ~ ~ t~l1 ~o .. ~ y °' ~ +r o L` N bA ~ H C A . ~ '~ C >. C? ~' • ~ •~ •~ ~ ~ L ~ V ~ ~ r .y.. 'II C ~ `~ 'C ~' ~ ~ E ¢ O L y •_ ai aci ° '~ ~ a aCi ~ °` ~" ~ ~ ° y U °' = c c ~ a x y °A o a a ~ v `" ;g ~ ~ on °~ ~ a i a i ' - ~ a~ i O g ~ ' d. fl C C ~ - ~ v ~ =? C ~ d ~ 4.. ~, cQ C II 3 C c ° 8 °' y =' = ~ U y ~ ~ CD ~ O «. .Q ' CS. v1 C to fir ~ ~ ~ C iii C C ~ y ~> C y ~ ~ d y a~ „ ~ ~, ~ c- ~ ~ v y ~ c U a . ~ ~ ~ E C ~ 'C bA ~' N ~ ~ C N U ~ 'C ~ Z Q a` w C7 ~ m U A [i m. ~ a Q m~ E= a ~ ~ ` o~ ~o o ~o ° ~c O N C?`` .\r ~ C1 ~ \ ^' N N N c +1 ~~1 ' ROANp,Y~ O L a ~ ti >' 9 Z ~, 2 v` a 1838 DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE March 13, 1996 C~~~x~#~ Ms. Carol Hingular Roanoke Times and World News Retail Advertising Division 201 W. Campbell Avenue Roanoke, VA 24011 Dear Carol, PAUL E. GRICE, CPA ASSISTANT DIRECTOR C f~ ~ I~ 9 ~~ ~~ ~ ~ "3 ~~ ~~~ ~ I ~- ~ '.,, Vi ;, ~ 'I ' ;, ~ ' '~R f 4 Iqo~ ~ , ~, ~ L'9 i'________ _ ' ' Enclosed you will find a "Notice of Proposed Tax Increase" advertisement for the County of Roanoke. Please publish this as a block ad on Tuesday, March 19, 1996. Bill the cost of publication to: County of Roanoke ATTN: Mary Allen Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 I would like to review a draft of the advertisement before publication. My fax number is 772-2186. Sincerely, 7~r ~%~ W. Brent Robertson Budget Manager C: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Mary Allen, Clerk to the Board Anne Marie Green, Community Relations DIANE D. HYAIT, CPA DIRECTOR P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (540) 772-2023 FAX: (540) 772-2186 ® Recycled Paper NOTICE OF PROPOSED REAL PROPERTY TAX INCREASE The County of Roanoke proposes to increase property tax levies. 1. Assessment Increase: Total assessed value of real property, excluding additional assessments due to new construction or improvements to property exceeds last year's total assessed value of real property by 4.08 percent. 2. Lowered Rate Necessary to Offset Increased Assessment: The tax rate which would levy the same amount of real estate tax as last year, when multiplied by the new total assessed value of real estate with the exclusions mentioned above, would be $1.08 per $100 of assessed value. This rate will be known as the "lowered tax rate." 3. Effective Rate Increase: The County of Roanoke proposes to adopt a tax rate of $1.13 per $100 of assessed value. The difference between the lowered tax rate and the current rate would be $0.05 per $100, or 4.63 percent. This difference will be known as the "effective tax rate increase." 4. The County of Roanoke proposes to set a real estate tax rate of not more than $1.13 per $100 assessed valuation. \~ Proposed Total Budget Increase: Based on the proposed real property tax rate and changes in other revenues, the total budget of the County of Roanoke will exceed last year's by 6.68 percent. The County will adopt the FY96-97 budget late spring, 1996. Individual property taxes may, however, increase at a percentage greater than or less than the above percentage. A public hearing on the increase will be held on Tuesday, March 26, 1996, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, Virginia. Special Instructions This notice shall be at least the size ofone-eighth page of a standard size or a tabloid size newspaper, and the headline in the advertisement shall be in a type no smaller than 18-point. The notice shall not be placed in that portion, if any, of the newspaper reserved for legal notices and classified advertisements. This notice must be published on March 19,1996, and billed to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. O~ POANp,I.~ L ti ~ z ~ ~~ 1838 DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE March 13 , 1996 Ms. Martha Plank Roanoke Times & World News 201-209 Campbell Avenue, SW Roanoke, VA 24011 Dear Martha, PAUL E. GRICE, CPA ASSISTANT DIRECTOR Please publish the enclosed legal advertisement on March 19, 1996. Bill the cost of the publication to: County of Roanoke ATTN: Mary Allen Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 I would like to review a draft of the advertisement before publication. My fax number is 772-2186. Sincerely, ~,~~~ W. Brent Robertson Budget Manager c: Elmer Hodge, County Administrator Mary Allen, Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Anne Marie Green, Director, Community Relations DIANE D. HYATT, CPA DIRECTOR P.O. BOX 29800 • ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 • (540) 772-2023 FAX: (540) 772-2186 ® Re~yaea P~- . w .. PUBLIC NOTICE Please be advised that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, at its meeting on the 26th day of March, 1996 at the Roanoke County Administration Center in Roanoke, Virginia, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, will hold a public hearing on the following matter, to-wit: TO SET A PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX RATE OF NOT MORE THAN $3.50 PER $100 ASSESSED VALUATION IN ROANOKE COUNTY. TO SET A MACHINERY AND TOOLS TAX RATE OF NOT MORE THAN $3.00 PER $100 ASSESSED VALUATION IN ROANOKE COUNTY. Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Publish on the following dates: March 19. 1996 LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COIINTY BOARD OF SIIPERVISORB The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, March. 26, 1996, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Boone, Boone & Loeb, Inc. to rezone 315+ acres from R-l, .AG-1, and AR to PRD, planned residential development to construct residential homes and commercial services, located on Cotton Hill Road, east and west of the Blue Ridge Parkway, Cave Spring Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, °i204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated : March 7 , 19 9 6 ~~~ C..~.LJ~c~ ~ ~~~c~ Mary H. A:Llen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times Tuesday, March 12, 1996 Tuesday, March 19, 1996 Direct the bill for publication to: Boone, Boone & Loeb Inc. PO Box 8156 Roanoke, VA 24014 (540) 772-9246 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PIIBLICATION TO: ROANORE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOY 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018 r v L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their 7:00 p.m. session on Tuesday, March 26, 1996, in the Board Meeting Room at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive S.W. on the petition of Mr. Paul A. Reburn and Ms. Cynthia W. Reburn requesting vacation of a 10 foot Public Utility Easement located along the north property line of Lot 9, Section 1 Country Hills, Plat Book 9, Page 65, located in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. A copy of the documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Engineering and Inspections, located at the Roanoke County Administration Center. Given under my hand this fifth day of March, 1996. ti Mary H. Allen, CMC, Clerk to the Board Roanoke County Board of Supervisors PLEASE PUBLISH IN THE ROANOKE TIMES ON: Tuesday, March 12, 1996 Tuesday, March 19, 1996 Direct the bill for publication to: Balzer and Associates 1208 Corporate Circle Roanoke, VA 24018 -~X~ ,3/s'/9 CO 3:.2 5 pix.. RKE FrOARD,SUPERVISORS TEL~703-772-21.93 Transmit Confirmation Report No . Rece i ~~rer Transmitter Date Time Mode Pages Result 003 RT-LEGAL RKE BOARD SUPERVISORS Mar 05'9~a 15 14 00'54 Norm 02 OK Mar 05' 96 15 14 FAX TO: ROANOKE TIMES LEGAL NOTICES FROM: MARY ALLEN, CLERK TO THE BOARD ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS DATE: MARCH 5, 1996 SUBJECT: ATTACHED LEGAL NOTICE PLEASE PUBLISH THE ATTACHED LEGAL NOTICE ON MARCH 12, 1996 AND MARCH 19, 1996. A REPRESENTATIVE FROM BALZER AND ASSOCIATES WILL COME DOWN AND PAY THE COST OF THE LEGAL NOTICE. CALL ME AT 772-2003 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. L E G A L N O T I C E Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their 7:00 p.m. session on Tuesday, March 26, 1996, in the Board Meeting Room at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive S.W. on the petition of Mr. Paul A. Reburn and Ms. Cynthia W. Reburn requesting vacation of a 10 foot Public Utility Easement located along the north property line of Lot 9, Section 1 Country Hills, Plat Book 9, Page 65, located in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. A copy of the documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Engineering and Inspections, located at the Roanoke County Administration Center. Given under my hand this fifth day of March, 1996. ~~ ~~ Mary H. Allen, CMC, Clerk to the Board Roanoke County Board of Supervisors PLEASE PUBLISH IN THE ROANOKE TIMES ON: Tuesday, March 12, 1996 Tuesday, March 19, 1996 Direct the bill for publication to: Balzer and Associates 1208 Corporate Circle Roanoke, VA 24018 -~x~ 3/s/9 ~O ... ~ i'~ ""L X72$ ~fA '. ~ 9~,0 '..ti' ~~ .., , ,~ w ~: ~ \ N ~~ j ~ N °~ ~~~ ~ W yJ J ~ ~ y ~ g LEGAL NOTICE ROANOBE COIINTY BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, March 26, 1996, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of HCMF Corp. to rezone 1.07 acres from C-2 to I-1 to construct offices and warehouse for pharmaceutical supplies at 7605 Robertson Lane, Hollins Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated : March 7 , 19 9 6 i' / ~Q-~.~..~~.,, ~~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times Tuesday, March 12, 1996 Tuesday, March 19, 1996 Direct the bill for publication to: HCMF Corporation Attn: David Branch 4965 Colonnade Dr, Suite 200 Roanoke, VA 24018-3541 (540) 774-4263 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PIIBLICATION TO: ROANORE COIINTY PLANNING DEPARTMEN P.O. BOY 29800, ROANORE, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE ROANORE COIINTY BOARD OF SIIPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, March 26, 1996, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Mountain Investors Corp. for a Special Use Permit to expand an existing manufactured home park, located at 5188 Yellow Mountain Road, Vinton Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: March 7, 1996 ~~~, ,~ , ,_ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times Tuesday, March 12, 1996 Tuesday, March 19, 1996 Direct the bill for publication to: Mountain Investors Corp. PO Box 200453 Roanoke, VA 24018 (540) 776-6901 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PIIBLICATION TO: ROANORE COIINTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BO% 29800, ROANORE, VA 21018 ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA i, MARCH 5, 1996 _ _ _ PUBLIC I-IEAI~ING: 7 P.M. (BOARD MEETING ROOM) EVENING SESSION: G. Call to Order H. Invocation/Pledge of Allegiance: Don Witt I. Public Hearing Petitions: 1. Petition of HCMF Corp. to rezone 1.07 acres from C-2 to I-1 to construct offices and warehouse for pharmaceutical supplies at 7605 Robertson Lane, Hollins Magisterial District. (CONT. FROM FEBRUARY) 2. Petition of Boone, Boone & Loeb, Inc. to rezone 315+ acres from R-1, AG-1, and AR to PRD, planned residential development to construct residential homes and commercial services, located on Cotton Hill Road, east and west of the Blue Ridge Parkway, Cave Spring Magisterial District. ~ ~~ 3. a Shenandoah B urch for a Special Use Permit to expand the existing church and sc sated on Williamson Road across from Brookside Shopping Cen ins Magisterial Dis Tn~_,~ 4. Petition of Mountain Investors Corp. for a Special Use Permit to expand an existing manufactured home park, located at 5188 Yellow Mountain Road, Vinton Magisterial District. J. Final Orders K. Citizens' Comments L. Comments of Planning Commissioners and Planning Staff M. Adjournment • ~9'.~~.~ .3 - /8 - 9l0 ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA MARCH 26, 1996 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement in order to partic~ate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings or other programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County, please contact the Clerk to the Board at (703) 772-200 We request that you provide at least 48- hours notice so that proper arrangements may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS i C C. PROCIAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Proclamation declaring the month of April 1996 as Child Abuse Prevention Month in Roanoke County. D. BRIEFINGS E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Resolution approving the Virginia Department of Transportation Six Year Primary Road Plan. (Arnold Covey, Director of Engineering & Inspections) 2. Appraval of an agreement accepting a voluntary contribution in lieu of a service charge from Lutheran Family Services of Virginia, Inc. (Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney) 3. o-~- e-~~ T V ~=Yu-a~-~2~ F. OLD BUSINESS G. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS H. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS I. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA 2 1. Ordinance to amend conditions on an existing Special Use Permit located at the intersection of Williamson Road and Summer View Drive, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Summerview Creekside. 2. Ordinance to rezone 1.0 acre from I-2 to C-2 and obtain a Special Use Permit in order to construct a used car lot, located at the intersection of West Main Street and Country Farm Road, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Randy Vest. 3. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to expand William Byrd High School, located at 2902 Washington Avenue, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of the Roanoke County School Board. 4. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to expand an existing equipment sales and service establishment located at 7549 Williamson Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Ace Sales, Inc. 5. Ordinance to rezone 88.53 acres from AG-3 to PCD, planned commercial development to allow commercial and recreational uses, located on the east side of the Blue Ridge Parkway at the north side of parkway bridge aver the Roanoke River at Niagara Dam, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of the Industrial Development Authority (Al Hammond) J. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 3 K. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance amending and reenacting the Roanoke County Code, Section 4, Chapter 4, Amusements to provide authority for Health Department inspections of public swimming pools. (Joseph Obenshain, Sr. Assistant County Attorney) 2. Ordinance amending Article IV, Sewer Use Standards, Chapter 18, Sewer and Sewage Disposal of the Roanoke County Code. (Gary Robertson, Utility Director) L. APPOINTMENTS 1. Blue Ridge Community Services 2. Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals 3. Highway and Transportation Safety Commission 4. New Century Council Vision Implementation Committees 5. Roanoke Valley Regional Stormwater Management Citizens Advisory Committee M. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WII.L BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Approval of Minutes -January 23, 1996, February 13, 4 1996, February 21, 1996, February 27, 1996, March 4, 1996. 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals, the New Century Council Vision Implementation Committees, and the Roanoke Valley Stormwater Management Advisory Committee. 3. Approval of a Bingo Permit for the Vinton Moose Lodge #1121. N. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS O. CITIZENS' COMII~NTS AND CONIlVIUNICATIONS P. REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund ~4 0~ c~ ~ -f'~a ~ S 4. to the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System in February 1996. -- '- 5. Report on legislation during the 1996 Session of the ..-.--~- _~" - .. Q• R. S. T. U. General Assembly. WORK SESSION 1. Budget Work Session ~ ~ a. Stan ~e "CIP'~ro~ects~r' J ~ ~ ~ SC.U SSI OILS b. Adoption of Rollover PolicyC-Z 'I° ~3 c.~dc~ ~+ CaI ~noL~-- EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION EVENING SESSION PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Public Hearing to elicit citizen comments on the following matters: (Brent Robertson, Budget Manager) a. To set a real estate tax rate of not more than $1.13 per $100 assessed valuation. b. To set a personal property tax rate of not more than $350 per $100 assessed valuation and a machinery and tools tax rate of not more than $3.00 per $100 assess valuation. 6 2. Public Hearing on the "effective" real estate tax increase as a result of increased assessed value of real estate. ~e~~j(,rs (Brent Robertson Budget Manager) ~ ~~S ~,c ~ /Y1 ~ T V. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND SECOND READING OF /~~~~ ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance to rezone 315+ acres from R-1, AG-1, and AR to PRD, planned residential development to construct residential homes and commercial services, located on Cotton Hill Road, east and west of the Blue Ridge Parkway, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Boone, Boone & Loeb, Inc. , ~-~~s~ ~~ 'ng) 2. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to expand an existing manufactured home park, located at 5188 Yellow Mountain Road, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of Mountain Investors Corp. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 3. Ordinance to rezone 1.07 acres from C-2 to I-1 to construct offices and warehouse for pharmaceutical supplies at 7605 Robertson Lane, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of HCMF Corp. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning & Zoning) 4. Ordinance vacating a 10 foot Public Utility Easement, located along the north property line of Lot 9, Section 1, Country Hills, recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 65, located in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District upon the petition of Paul A. and Cynthia W. Reburn. (Arnold Covey, Director of Engineering & Inspections) THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC HEARING HAS BEEN CONTINUED BY THE PL,A-NNING COMII~IISSION 1. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to expand the existing church and school facilities, located on Williamson Road across from Brookside Shopping Center, I, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Shenandoah Baptist Church. W. CITIZEN COMII~NTS AND CO1~~IlVIUNICATIONS X. ADJOURNMENT 8 MAP.-18-9€, MON 04:04 PM CHILD ABUSE PRE~d COUNCIL 540 344 3520 ~.. Child Abuse , Rr~ventiQn Coun~~l of Roanoke Valley 3207 Brandon Avenue, SW • Suite 1 Roanoke, Virginl;3 24018 Phone (540)344-3579 ~ Fax(540)344-3520 march 1 R, 199b Ms. Mary A11en, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P.O. Box 29844 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Isar Ms. Alien; I am writing to request that the Board of Supesv~sors of Roanoke County proclaim April as Child Abuse Prevention Month. ,tn ~~iscat Year 1994-95, there were X0,173 abused and neglected children in the Commonwealth of Virginia. ~f these, b5 children were residents of ltoano?~e County or Salem. Child abuse and neglect are evident in every community, but I hc~pc llaat the lcadcrs of Roanoke County will make it 1a~own that they recognize this problem, and support prevention efforts. 'Thatdc you for your a.~aistance with this matter. P.@2 _~, Sincereky, on~ere ' '~3rab am n e.~.,oe P~"'o ~ ~ . An Rifiiste a ?~•veni Child Abuse virgirJa vuglnia CM~ptat Wllon•i A United w•Y Y ~~}~ b PtevKll ~ Child Abuse MAR-18-96 MON 04:04 PM CHILD ABUSE PRE'v' COUNCIL 540 344 3520 r Child Abuse ,- - . Prevention Coune~l of Roanoke Valley 3201 Brandon Avenue, SW ~ suite 1 Roanoke, Virginia 240 S 8 Phone (703) 344-3579 P. 01 O1V~: NA.~E: ~. SAX ~: _ - - ~ N~JlI'~BE~ 4T' ~A~ES: C0IVXMEIV`TS. Y M Apillate of ` - y PrNant Child Abure. VKginid .~ r Vv~~' [%haPfd ~dllOr~! A UniIBG Way AgCM ...~...~.s rnr P1wuwnlidl 01