Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
8/27/1996 - Regular
C~mYZt#~ ~r~ ~.u~xn~~e +wrsMr~r~ WORKING DOCUMENT S UBJECT TO REVISION ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION AGENDA AUGUST 27, 1996 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. /ndividua/s with disabi/ities who require assistance or special arrangement in order to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings or other programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County, p/ease contact the Clerk to .the Board at (540J 772-2005. We request that you provide at /east 48- hours notice so that proper arrangements maybe made. THERE WILL BE AN AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING PRIOR TO THE REGULAR SESSION AT 2:00 P. M. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: The Reverend James W. Reynolds, Retired, United Methodist Church i 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Resolution of Appreciation upon the retirement of Elizabeth Leah, Registrar. MS. L,EA_H_ PRESENT TO ACCEPT RESO R-082796-1 FM MOTION TO ADOPT RESO II~~ 2. Recognition of Sheila Rose Dooley for being named Public Employee of the Year by the Roanoke Valley Regional Homebuilders Association. D. BRIEFINGS E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request for approval of an agreement for aPublic-Private s Partnership with an economic development prospect. (Tim Gubala, Director of Economic Development) R-082796-2 HCN MOTION TO ADOPT RESO APPROVING AGREEMENT AND APPROPRIATING $105,222 FROM BOARD CONTINGENCY FUND AYESs LBE. FM,._Eg3, HCN LYAY~: LY~21~ ABSTAIN: ~ 2. Authorization to apply to the Virginia Public School Authority for $1,300,000 previously approved to complete N o r t h s i d e High S c h o o l Gymnasium/Auditorium/Classrooms. (Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance) R-082796-3 FFH MOTION TO APPROVE RESO TO APPLY I~~ 3. Authorization to submit the previously approved Supplemental Literary Fund Application for Fort Lewis Elementary School in the amount of $535,459. (Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance) I 4. Request for authorization to extend the lease agreement with the Fifth District Employment and Training Consortium for County property located at 3330 Valley Forge Avenue. (Tim Gubala, Director of Economic Development) I~$.~ 3 5. Authorization to vote proxy for Trigon Demutualization. (Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance) A-082796-6 BL.T MOTION TO AFFIRM THAT DIR OF FINANCE HAS AUTHORITY TO MAKE DECISION ON PROXY I~~ F. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS BL.T ADVISED (~) HE H_AS REQUESTED A RETRE AT MEETING WITH CHOO . BOARD FOR SOMETIME IN EA RLY F ALL. (~) CLERK WILL BE ASKING FOR D ATES TO SET MEETIN T THAT REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COM MERC E HAS REQUESTED. 3) CLERK WILL BE ASK NG O ( I F R DATES FOR .TOINT MEETIN T WITH SALEM CITY COUNCIL WITH COUNTY BEING HO T. LBE ASKED FOR FUTURE WORK SESSIONS: X11 PAYMENT IN LIEU OF TAXES FOR NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION, IN IN CHURCHE . (~) MISSION STATEMENT FOR ENTIRE COUNTY (31 DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE PRO RAM. G. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS H. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA 1. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to construct a religious assembly facility, located on Edgebrook Road, 4 0.33 mile west of Thompson Memorial Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Salem Church of God. FFH MOTION TO TABLE BECAUSE OF UNCERTAINTY ABOUT AFFECT OF VDOT IMPROVEMENTSTO I-81 IIB~ 2. Ordinance to rezone 1.11 acres from AR to I-1 to expand an existing custom manufacturing facility, located at 2056 Loch Haven Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Daniel Peters. 3. Ordinance to rezone 2.45 acres from R-1 to R-3 to allow four lots to be served by a private roadway, located on the west side of Old Cave Spring Road and the south side of Cave Spring Lane, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the petition of Jeffrey Maronic, Inc. BL.T MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READINGS FOR H.2 A_ND H. 3 AND SET 2ND A_ND PUBLIC HEARING FOR SEPTEMBER 24~ 1996 I. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES J. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizing the conveyance of a 10 foot gas line easement to Roanoke Gas company across a portion of the Public Service Center. (John Willey, Property Manager) 0-082796-7 FF~i MOTION TO APPROVE ORD II$i~ 5 K. APPOINTMENTS 1. Grievance Panel HCN NOMINATED R. VINCENT REYNOLDS 2. Metropolitan Transportation District Study Committee TO BE DISCUSSED IN EXECUTIVE SESSION L. CONSENT AGENDA R-082796-8 BL.T MOTION TO APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA WITH IT M 6 REMOVED I~~ ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Confirmation of appointment to Industrial Development Authority. 2. Request for acceptance of Barley Drive, an extension of Barley Drive, plated under the "West Salem Forest Subdivision," into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 3. Request from the School Board to appropriate $75,000 to the School Grant Fund for the Roanoke area Tech Prep Consortium. 6 4. Request to appropriate funds for the rental of mobile units at Cave Spring Junior High School. 5. Donation of drainage easements in connection with the Green Valley Bond Project and improvements to the roadside drainage on Sunnyvale Street. A-082796-8.e 6. Resolution honoring the late Joan Lyons, Social Services Department, for over fourteen years of services to Roanoke County. R-082796- 8. f FM ASKED CLERK TO READ RESO FM MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM 6 IIB~ M. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS ,supervisor Eddv ~ll A sked th at copi es of m inut es a nd info rma tion , regarding School Board and B lue Rib bo n Stu dy C om mitt ee b e furni shed for Board members. BL.T advised tha t p ack et of info rm ation had been recei ved and copies of minutes will 6e prov ide d i n the futur e. (2) Ask ed abo ut st ates of Policy Manual and when it wou ld be brou ght to th e B oard PMM adv i~Qrl that no date has been yet ( ~ Has ex pre ssed inter est in t he p ast at c hang i~ , the real estate tax collection da te a nd ask ed t hat st aff dev elop an info rma , tion .port to share with the Board , inc lud ing how it is ha ndle d in other lo calit ie DDH advised that a report co uld be pr ovid ed in th e ne xt w eek or so (~ Asked for Board interest in ad diti ona l all ocatio n of fund s from Bo ard C'on ingency Fund as proposed du ring b udget proc ess H CN asked t o rev isit the entire issue. BL.T suggest ed s che dul ing w ork Ses sion for last me etin g in September. Supervisor Minnix• A nno unc ed that vi it or fro m P oland will be leaving at end of week and he and Tr eas urer are c on side ring their in vitat ion to visit Poland in Spring 1997 at th Supervisor Harrison: Thank eir ow ed Ar n exp nold C ense. ovev for help in getting double yellow lines down Skyview A ve and expressed appreciation from neighborhood. Supervisor .Tohnson: (11 Ad vised that B oard had a retreat August 24 and 25, 1996, and discussed many ~gni ficant issues including public schools and Parks & Rcreation topics The Board would like to have a similar retreat with the School Board. Asked that Clerk summarize information from flip charts and provide repor t to ea ch Bo ard member; N. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS O. REPORTS FM MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE AFT ,R niSCU ION OF IT ,M 5 ILLY 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investments and Portfolio Policy, as of July 31, 1996. 5. Annual Report on Police Department Traffic Unit. I,BE NOTED TIiAT POLICE DEPT REVENUE EX FF ED UNIT COST BY $53.11$ 6. Accounts Paid -July 1996. P. WORK SESSION s Q. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (7) Consultation with legal counsel pertaining to contract for Sewage Treatment Plant; (1) Personnel, appointment of individuals to committees; (3) Acquisition of real property for Hanging Rock Battlefield; and ('n Litigation concerning Dixie Caverns Landfill Cleanup. BL.T MOTION TO GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION AT 4:35 P.M. 3~8~ R. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION EVENING SESSION S. PUBLIC HEARINGS T. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance to rezone 5 acres from R-3 to C-1 with conditions to allow commercial uses, located at the terminus of Burlington Drive adjacent to Friendship Manor, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of the Industrial Development Authority. (Trent Development) CONTINUED FROM MAY 28, 1996 AND JULY 23, 1996) 9 (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning and Zoning) 0-082796-10 BLJ MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC U. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1 Ordinance declaring a parcel of real estate to be surplus and accepting an offer for the sale of same; namely the Crestwood Park Well Lot, Tax Map No. 76.16-2-13. CONTINUED FROM JULY 23, 1996 (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 0-082796-11 LBE MOTION TO ADOPT ORD ACCEPTING OFFER OF WILLIAM E HILL FOR $9,500 AYES: LBE, FMs FFH, BLJ Y HCN 2. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to operate a day care center located at 5501 Florist Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Shining Stars Early Learning Centers, Inc. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning and Zoning) 0-082796-12 BLJ MOTION TO ADOPT ORD WITH CONDITION REVI ED• THE OUTSIDE AREA WILL BE FENCED, AS SHOWN ON THE SUBMITTED CONCEPT PLAN, WITH A WOODEN PRIVA Y FEN E ALON THE TWO SIDES, A CHAIN LINK FEN E ALON THE BA K AND A CHAIN LINK FENCE IN FRONT. URC 3. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to construct a religious assembly, located between 7425 and 7502 Old Mill Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the petition of blister Sowder. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning and Zoning) io 0-082796-13 LBE MOTION TO ADOPT ORD WITH REVISED CONDITION - WITHDRAWN WITH NO VOTE LBE MOTION TO ADOPT ORD WITH ORIGINAL CONDITION URC 4. Ordinance to rezone approximately 5.5 acres from I-1 and C-1 to C-2 with conditions and obtain a Special Use Permit to construct assisted living and elderly housing facilities, located approximately 0.1 mile north of the intersection of Route 460 and Daugherty Road, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Richfield Retirement Community. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning and Zoning) 0-082796-14 FFH MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC 5. Ordinance to rezone 0.82 acre from R-3 to C-1 to construct professional offices, located at 3422 Ogden Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Barry L. Marsh. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning and Zoning) 0-082796-15 FM MOTION TO ADOPT ORD AYES: FM, FFH, HCN~ BL.T LYAY~ LLQ~ ABSTAIN: L~ V. CITIZEN COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS W. ADJOURNMENT ii C~mxxt#~ ~rf ~.~a~tx~.u~e ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA AUGUST 27, 1996 +wrs n~~rs~ welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. /ndividua/s with disabi/ities who require assistance or special arrangement in order to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings or other programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County, p/ease contact the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772-2005. We request that you pro vide at /east 48- hours notice so that proper arrangements maybe made. THERE WILL BE AN AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING PRIOR TO THE REGULAR SESSION AT 2:00 P.M. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: The Reverend James W. Reynolds, Retired, United Methodist Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. i B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Resolution of Appreciation upon the retirement of Elizabeth Leah, Registrar. 2. Recognition of Sheila Rose Dooley for being named Public Employee of the Year by the Roanoke Valley Regional Homebuilders Association. D. BRIEFINGS E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request for approval of an agreement for aPublic-Private Partnership with an economic development prospect. (Tim Gubala, Director of Economic Development) 2. Authorization to apply to the Virginia Public School Authority for $1,300,000 previously approved to complete N o r t h s i d e High S c h o o l Gymnasium/Auditorium/Classrooms. (Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance) 3. Authorization to submit the previously approved Supplemental Literary Fund Application for Fort Lewis Elementary School in the amount of $535,459. (Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance) 4. Request for authorization to extend the lease agreement with the Fifth District Employment and Training Consortium for County property located at 3330 Valley Forge Avenue. (Tim Gubala, Director of Economic Development) a F. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS G. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS H. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA 1. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to construct a religious assembly facility, located on Edgebrook Road, 0.33 mile west of Thompson Memorial Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Salem Church of God. 2. Ordinance to rezone 1.11 acres from AR to I-1 to expand an existing custom manufacturing facility, located at 2056 Loch Haven Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Daniel Peters. 3. Ordinance to rezone 2.45 acres from R-1 to R-3 to allow four lots to be served by a private roadway, located on the west side of Old Cave Spring Road and the south side of Cave Spring Lane, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the petition of Jeffrey Maronic, Inc. I. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES J. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance authorizing the conveyance of a 10 foot gas line easement to Roanoke Gas company across a portion of the Public Service Center. (John Willey, Property Manager) K. APPOINTMENTS 1. Grievance Panel 3 2. Metropolitan Transportation District Study Committee L. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Confirmation of appointment to Industrial Development Authority. 2. Request for acceptance of Barley Drive, an extension of Barley Drive, plated under the "West Salem Forest Subdivision," into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 3. Request from the School Board to appropriate $75,000 to the School Grant Fund for the Roanoke area Tech Prep Consortium. 4. Request to appropriate funds for the rental of mobile units at Cave Spring Junior High School. 5. Donation of drainage easements in connection with the Green Valley Bond Project and improvements to the roadside drainage on Sunnyvale Street. 6. Resolution honoring the late Joan Lyons, Social Services Department, for over fourteen years of services to Roanoke County. M. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS N. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS 4 O. REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investments and Portfolio Policy, as of July 31, 1996. 5. Annual Report on Police Department Traffic Unit. 6. Accounts Paid -July 1996. P. WORK SESSION Q. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A ('n Consultation with legal counsel pertaining to contract for Sewage Treatment Plant, and (1) Personnel, appointment of individuals to committees. R. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION FVF,1yING SESSION S. PUBLIC HEARINGS T. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance to rezone 5 acres from R-3 to C-1 with conditions to allow commercial uses, located at the terminus of Burlington Drive adjacent to Friendship Manor, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of the Industrial Development Authority. (Trent Development) CONTINUED FROM MAY 28, 1996 AND JULY 23, 1996) (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning and Zoning) 5 U. v. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1 Ordinance declaring a parcel of real estate to be surplus and accepting an offer for the sale of same; namely the Crestwood Park Well Lot, Tax Map No. 76.16-2-13. CONTINUED FROM JULY 23, 1996 (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 2. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to operate a day care center located at 5501 Florist Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Shining Stars Early Learning Centers, Inc. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning and Zoning) 3. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to construct a religious assembly, located between 7425 and 7502 Old Mill Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the petition of blister Sowder. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning and Zoning) 4. Ordinance to rezone approximately 5.5 acres from I-1 and C-1 to C-2 with conditions and obtain a Special Use Permit to construct assisted living and elderly housing facilities, located approximately 0.1 mile north of the intersection of Route 460 and Daugherty Road, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Richfield Retirement Community. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning and Zoning) 5. Ordinance to rezone 0.82 acre from R-3 to C-1 to construct professional offices, located at 3422 Ogden Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Barry L. Marsh. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning and Zoning) CITIZEN COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS W. ADJOURNMENT 6 ~ ~ ""' ` AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 27, 1996 RESOLUTION 082796-1 EXPRESSING APPRECIATION UPON THE RETIREMENT OF ELIZABETH LEAH, REGISTRAR WHEREAS, Elizabeth Leah was employed as Registrar for the County of Roanoke on December 1, 1969, and has served as Registrar for twenty-six years; and WHEREAS, during Ms. Leah's tenure, the registered voters of Roanoke County grew to 46,000, representing 80% of eligible citizens, which is a far higher percentage than the nation at large and most other jurisdictions; and WHEREAS, the Registrar's Office performs their responsibilities with great public respect, and received one of the highest ratings in the recent Citizen Satisfaction Survey; and WHEREAS, under her direction, the Registrar's Office instituted computerized record keeping, implemented the provisions of the National Voter Registration Act, and initiated on-going tests of electronic voting alternatives for future use; and WHEREAS, Ms. Leah has served as President and in many other capacities with the Voter Registrars Association of Virginia; and WHEREAS, Ms. Leah through her employment with Roanoke County has been instrumental in improving the quality of life for its citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to ELIZABETH 1 i LEAH for twenty six years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke County. FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy, restful, and productive retirement. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. H lton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Resolutions of Appreciation File Joseph Sgroi, Director, Human Resources Diane St. John, Registrar 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 27, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Recognition of Sheila Rose Dooley for being selected the Public Employee of the Year by the Roanoke Regional Homebuilders Association COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OR INFORMATION: Roanoke County is pleased to announced that Sheila Rose Dooley, a Permit Clerk in the Department of Development Services, has been selected as the 1996 Public Employee of the Year by the Roanoke Regional Homebuilders Association. This award is presented annually by the Homebuilders to a public employee whom they consider an asset to the building community and exhibits a helpful and knowledgeable attitude. The Homebuilders work with local governments from the Cities of Roanoke and Salem and the Counties of Roanoke, Botetourt, Franklin and Bedford. Previous Roanoke County employees who have received the award include Engineering and Inspections Director Arnold Covey and Utility Director Gary Robertson. This is a first time a front- line employee from any local government has received this honor. Sheila Rose has been employed as a Permit Clerk with Roanoke County for 13 years. This is a difficult job that requires customer service skills and a knowledge of building regulations. I am proud that Ms. Dooley has been selected for this important award by the customers who deal with her on a daily basis. ~~~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy Received ( ) Harrison Referred ( ) Johnson To ( ) Minnix Nickens t "" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 27, 1996 RESOLUTION 082796-2 AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT WITH AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROSPECT AND THE APPROPRIATION OF $105220 TO PROMOTE AND ENCOURAGE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN ROANORE COUNTY WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, desires to promote and encourage the economic development and vitality of Roanoke County and the Roanoke Valley through the recruitment and retention of industry on behalf of the citizens of the Roanoke Valley, in order to provide for increased employment and corporate investment in Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, this increased employment and investment constitute a valid purpose for the expenditure of public funds; and WHEREAS, the economic development prospect desires to support the economic development efforts of the County and anticipates constructing its headquarters in the U. S. Route 460 Corridor. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the County Administrator, or his designee, is hereby authorized to execute a Performance Agreement with the economic development prospect for the purposes of promoting economic development and providing incentives for private investment in facilities and equipment in Roanoke County, all upon form approved by the County Attorney. 2. That the sum of $105,220 is hereby appropriated from the Board Contingency Fund in order that the County may fulfill its 1 obligations under the performance agreement and to finance public incentives for business locations and expansions. 3. That these public incentives include extensions of public utilities, drainage improvements, payment of connection fees, and the creation of a community storm water management facility. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Supervisor Johnson A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. H ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Timothy W. Gubala, Director, Economic Development Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance 2 4 ~ Item No. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: August 27, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Request for approval of an agreement for a Public- Private Partnership with an economic development prospect ~'OUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: We wi// hopefu//y comp/ete an agreement with this prospect by the time of the board meeting. if we are ab/e to do so, the funds requested will be for this project. lam reluctant to take these funds from the Unappropriated fund balance because it wi// resu/tin a lower balance than the 6.25% estab/fished by the Board. We wi/l update the Pub/ic Private Partnership Po/icy before the next project is brought to you. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Staff has been working with an economic development prospect seeking to locate on an approximate one acre commercial tract in the Route 460 East Bonsack Corridor in Roanoke County. A key factor affecting the location of the prospect and the development of other sites in the area is the absence of a storm water management plan. The County staff has proposed to jointly plan for a regional storm water detention pond with affected property owners in the area. The pond would be located downstream and would serve not only the prospects site but other properties in the area. This action would allow the prospect to locate and would open up 103 acres of adjacent land for commercial and industrial development. The initial Prospect would generate an estimated $47,075 annually in new revenues to the County from real estate and personal property taxes, business license and sales tax. The proposed project would retain 30 jobs in the community and result in the construction of an approximate 11,000 square foot building. County financial participation in the extension of a sewer line will assist in the prospect's location and the further development of commercial property owned by the Gish family. Staff is requesting approval of the draft performance agreement and the appropriation of $105,220 towards the design and construction of a regional storm water detention pond, the extension of a sewer -f .. line and the payment of utility connection fees. Payback from new taxes for this project will occur between the second and third year after location. Fiscal Impact Funds are available for transfer to the Economic Development Public-Private Partnership Fund from the Board Contingency Fund. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the attached resolution to authorize the county Administrator to execute a performance agreement with the prospect and to appropriate $105,220 from the Board Contingency Fund and transfer it to the Public- Private Partnership Fund. Respectfully submitted: Approved: w~ C~ . Timothy W. Gu ala, Director Elmer C. Hodge Department of Economic Development County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: Eddy Johnson Harrison Minnix Nickens Attachment •i • Scale: 1" = 300' Date: Augu ~~ Agreement ~ Impacted by Proposed ~mwater Management `er East rce Center iateway thin Roanoke City ndary lines are roximate location Acreage ~ ° ~ ~ 9 r~ d ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ 79 ~ 6 103 U ~ O -+--' ~ O ~ O ~ O+~Q ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~-, O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O O N U ~QW r f` ~ ~ ~ i /~'1 /J f ~ ~ ,+ ~' ~'~,,. ' 1 w ~~% ,., AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE CO~`tTNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 27, 1996 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT WITH AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROSPECT AND THE APPROPRIATION OF $105,220 TO PROMOTE AND ENCOURAGE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN ROANOKE COUNTY WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, desires to promote and encourage the economic development and vitality of Roanoke County and the Roanoke Valley through the recruitment and retention of industry on behalf of the citizens of the Roanoke Valley, in order to provide for increased employment and corporate investment in Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, this increased employment and investment constitute a valid purpose for the expenditure of public funds; and WHEREAS, the economic development prospect desires to support the economic development efforts of the County and anticipates constructing its headquarters in the U. S. Route 460 Corridor. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the County Administrator, or his designee, is hereby authorized to execute a Performance Agreement with the economic development prospect for the purposes of promoting economic development and providing incentives for private investment in facilities and equipment in Roanoke County, all upon form approved by the County Attorney. 2. That the sum of $105,220 is hereby appropriated from the Board Contingency Fund in order that the County may fulfill its 1 r~ obligations under the performance agreement and to finance public incentives for business locations and expansions. 3. That these public incentives include extensions of public utilities, drainage improvements, payment of connection fees, and the creation of a community storm water management facility. G.attorney.pmm.agre.res ~~ 2 ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE HOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 27, 1996 RESOLUTION 082796-3 AUTHORIZING AN APPLICATION TO THE VIRGINIA PUBLIC SCHOOL AUTHORITY WHEREAS, the Roanoke County School Board and the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke Virginia ("County") have determined that it is advisable to contract a debt and issue general obligation bonds of the County of Roanoke in an amount not to exceed $1,300,000 to finance certain capital improvements for public school purposes ("Bonds") and to sell the bonds to the Virginia Public School Authority("VPSA"): NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE: 1. The County Administrator is authorized and directed to submit an application to the VPSA in order to sell the bonds to the VPSA at the Fall 1996 VPSA bond sale. 2. The Board of Supervisors adopts this declaration of official intent under Treasury Regulations Section 1.150-2. The Board of Supervisors reasonably expects to reimburse advances made or to be made by the County or the school board to pay the costs of acquiring, constructing and equipping the capital improvements for school purposes from the proceeds of its debt or other financings. The maximum amount of debt of other financing expected to be issued for such improvements is $1,300,000. 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately. 1 ,I On motion of Supervisor Harrison to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~X u 'v Brenda J. H lton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Dr. Deanna Gordon, School Superintendent 2 ACTION NO. ~~ ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 27, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Authorization to Apply to the Virginia Public School Authority for $1,300,000 Previously Approved to Complete Northside High School Gymnasium/Auditorium/Classrooms COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~~~,~.~ a --=-^~`~ ~~ BACKGROUND: The County and County Schools received a Literary Loan for Northside High School in the amount of $1,500,000. In May 1996, the construction bids were opened on the gymnasium/auditorium/classroom addition and the project totaled $2,800,000. At their meeting on May 14, 1996, the County Board voted to award the construction bid and to include the additional $1,300,000 needed in the 1996 Fall VPSA Bond sale. Complete funding for the Northside project includes the following: Literary Loan released March 28, 1996 $1,500,000 Proposed VPSA Fall 1996 bond issue 1,300,000 Total Project $2,800,000 SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: We have recently received the application packet for the 1996 Fall VPSA Bond sale. As part of this application process a specific resolution needs to be adopted by the School Board and then the County Board to participate in this sale. The School Board adopted the attached resolution at their meeting on August 22, 1996. FISCAL IMPACT: The first debt payment on this issue will not begin until the 1997-98 fiscal year. It will average around $130,000 per year. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approving the attached resolution authorizing the application to the Virginia Public School Authority to participate in the 1996 Fall VPSA bond sale for the amount of $1,300,000. m:\finance\common\board\8-27-96.wpd August 22, 1996 ~~ SUBMITTED BY: ~,ccr~ , /~.. ~~.t.~t! Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance APPROVED: Elmer C . Hodge County Administrator Approved () Motion by No Yes Abs Denied () Eddy Received () Harrison Referred () Johnson To O Minnix Nickens m:\finance\common\board\8-27-96.wpd August 22, 1996 ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 27, 1996 RESOLUTION ATHORIZING AN APPLICATION TO THE VIRGINIA PUBLIC SCHOOL AUTHORITY WHEREAS, the Roanoke County School Board and the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke ,Virginia ("County") have determined that it is advisable to contract a debt and issue general obligation bonds of the County of Roanoke in an amount not to exceed $1,300,000 to finance certain capital improvements for public school purposes ("Bonds") and to sell the bonds to the Virginia Public School Authority ("VPSA"): NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE: 1. The County Administrator is authorized and directed to submit an application to the VPSA in order to sell the bonds to the VPSA at the Fall 1996 VPSA bond sale. 2. The Board of Supervisors adopts this declaration of official intent under Treasury Regulations Section 1.150-2. The Board of Supervisors reasonably expects to reimburse advances made or to be made by the County or the school board to pay the costs of acquiring, constructing and equipping the capital improvements for school purposes from the proceeds of its debt or other financings. The maximum amount of debt of other financing expected to be issued for such improvements is $1,300,000. 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately. .~ ~~~ RESOLUTION OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD AUTHORIZING AN APPLICATION TO THE VIRGINIA PUBLIC SCHOOL AUTHORITY WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF SCHOOL BONDS TO THE VIRGINIA PUBLIC SCHOOL AUTHORITY WHEREAS, the Roanoke County School Board and the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke ,Virginia ("County") have determined that it is advisable to contract a debt and issue general obligation bonds of the County of Roanoke in an amount not to exceed $1,300,000 to finance certain capital improvements for public school purposes ("Bonds") and to sell the bonds to the Virginia Public School Authority ("VPSA"): NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD: 1. The School Board requests pursuant to Section 15.1-227.41 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended (the "Code") that the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke issue the Bonds and submit an application to the VPSA in order to sell the Bonds to the VPSA at the 1996 Fall VPSA bond sale and the Superintendent of Schools or such officer as she may designate is authorized to submit such documentation as may be required by VPSA. The School Board consents pursuant to Section 15.1-227.39B of the Code and Article VII, Section 10 (b) of the Constitution of Virginia to the issuance and sale of the bonds to the VPSA. 2 This resolution shall take effect immediately. Adopted by the Roanoke County School board on August 22, 1996. Clerk, Roanoke County School Board M:\finance\common\boazd\8-22-96.res August 21, 1996 A-082796-4 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER '~~3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 27, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Authorization to Submit the Previously Approved Supplemental Literary Fund Application for Fort Lewis Elementary School in the Amount of $535,459. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: J~,-~'~~""' 4~ BACKGROUND: In June 1994, the County and County Schools filed a Literary Loan application for Fort Lewis Elementary School in the amount of $1,300,000. In May 1996, the construction bids were opened and the revised budget for the project became $2,455,575. The School Board and the County Board discussed downsizing the project or appropriating additional money to complete the project. At their meeting on July 23, 1996 the County Board of Supervisors approved additional funding to complete the proposed Fort Lewis Elementary School project. This funding was to come from available School funds to the extent possible, and the balance to be funded through a supplemental Literary Loan that was not to exceed $575,000. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: In finalizing these amounts, the portion that is remaining to be funded through a Supplemental Literary Loan is $535,459. The project engineer has determined that this portion is attributable to inflation and would qualify for a Supplemental Literary Loan. The complete funding for the Fort Lewis elementary School is as follows: Original Literary Loan amount $1,300,000 Pending supplemental Literary Loan 535,459 Funds reallocated from 1995 VPSA bonds and allocated from interest income on 1993 GO bonds 620,116 Total Project $2,455,575 At their meeting of August 22, 1996 the School Board adopted the attached resolution requesting the authorization to submit a supplemental Literary Loan for Fort Lewis in the amount of $535,459. Staff m:\finance\common\board\8-27-96a.wpd August 22, 1996 ,. ,= ~ ~ will work with the Schools to file the necessary applications. Funds should be available in September or October 1996. FISCAL IMPACT: The new debt service for the Supplemental Literary Loan will be approximately $42,000 per year. There will not be a payment due in the 1996-97 fiscal year. Partial payment is projected for the 1997-98 fiscal year contingent upon the completion date of the project. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends authorizing the School Board to apply for the Supplementary Literary Loan for Fort Lewis Elementary in the amount of $535,459. SUBMITTED BY: Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) APPROVED: ~- Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION Motion by: Fenton F. Harrison to approve staff recommendation cc: File Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Dr. Deanna Gordon, School Superintendent VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy _~ Harrison .~ Johnson ~ Minnix x Nickens x m:\finance\common\board\8-27-96a.wpd August 22, 1996 ,~ .°" RESOLUTION REQUESTING AUTHORIZATION BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO SUBMIT A SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION TO THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA FOR A LITERARY FUND LOAN WHEREAS, the Roanoke County School Board applied for literary loan funding to renovate the Fort Lewis Elementary school in July 1994 in the amount of $1,300,000; and WHEREAS, the construction bids for the project are in excess of the original literary loan requested due to inflationary increases since 1994, and WHEREAS, said school board deems it appropriate and in the best interest of the school division to submit a supplemental literary loan application in the amount of $535,459, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County School Board of Roanoke County, Virginia requests the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County to authorize said school board to submit a supplemental application to the Commonwealth of Virginia for the Literary Fund loan as herein set forth. C:\WPWIN60\WPDOCS\BOARD\082296. RES I t-r AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 27, 1996 RESOLUTION 082796-5 AUTHORIZING THE EXTENSION OF THE LEASE AGREEMENT WITH THE FIFTH DISTRICT EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING CONSORTIUM FOR COUNTY PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3330 VALLEY FORGE AVENUE WHEREAS, by agreement dated the 28th day of March, 1995, the County agreed to lease 3330. Valley Forge Avenue to the Fifth District Employment and Training Consortium (FDETC) for a community resource center; and, WHEREAS, this agreement was authorized by Ordinance No. 31495- 5; and, WHEREAS, this agreement provided for the extension of the term upon request from FDETC for an additional fifteen months upon approval of the Board of Supervisors. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, By the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1) That FDETC is hereby authorized to extend and continue its use of 3330 Valley Forge Avenue pursuant to the terms and conditions of the 28th March, 1995 agreement. 2) That this extension of use shall not continue beyond September 30, 1996. 3) That the County Administrator, or his designee, is hereby authorized to take such actions and to execute such documents, all upon form approved by the County Attorney, as may be necessary to accomplish the purposes of this Resolution. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: 1 AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Ho on, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Timothy W. Gubala, Director, Economic Development Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Item No. ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: August 27, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Extension of Agreement with Fifth District Employment and Training Consortium COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~~z~ry,~.~.~~~~~ BACKGROUND• The Board of Supervisors entered into an agreement with the Fifth District Employment and Training Consortium (FDETC) on March 28, 1995, for the use of County property at 3330 Valley Forge Avenue, previously used as the County's Voter Registration Office, as a Community Resource Center. The Consortium had received a grant from the United States Department of Labor to provide employment counseling services to dislocated workers in the Roanoke Valley. The current agreement will expire on August 31, 1996. The FDETC is seeking a grant from the Department of Labor to continue employment services for dislocated workers. They are requesting continued use of the County property for a one month period until September 30, 1996. Staff is considering another proposed County use for the 1,000 square foot building. The staff recommends authorization by the County Administrator to amend the existing agreement and extend the FDETC use of the property for one additional month. ~' `~ STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the attached resolution to allow the FDETC to continue to use the property at 3330 Valley Forge Avenue for a one month period. The County Administrator should be authorized to execute an amended agreement on a form approved by the County Attorney. Respectfully submitted: ' G~,/. Timot y W. Gubala, Director Economic Development Department Approved: ~ U Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: No Yes Abs Eddy _ Johnson _ Harrison Minnix _ Nickens Attachment ... ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 27, 1996 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXTENSION OF THE LEASE AGREEMENT WITH THE FIFTH DISTRICT EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING CONSORTIUM FOR COUNTY PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3330 VALLEY FORGE AVENUE WHEREAS, by agreement dated the 28th day of March, 1995, the County agreed to lease 3330 Valley Forge Avenue to the Fifth District Employment and Training Consortium (FDETC) for a community resource center; and, WHEREAS, this agreement was authorized by Ordinance No. 31495- 5; and, WHEREAS, this agreement provided for the extension of the term upon request from FDETC for an additional fifteen months upon approval of the Board of Supervisors. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, By the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1) That FDETC is hereby authorized to extend and continue its use of 3330 Valley Forge Avenue pursuant to the terms and conditions of the 28th March, 1995 agreement. 2) That this extension of use shall not continue beyond September 30, 1996. 3) That the County Administrator, or his designee, is hereby authorized to take such actions and to execute such documents, all upon form approved by the County Attorney, as may be necessary to accomplish the purposes of this Resolution. G:\ATTORNEY\ PMM\ FDETCEXT.RES A-082796-6 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~ °' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMI1~iISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 27, 1996 AGENDA~ITEM: Authority to Vote Proxy for Trigon Demutualization COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Trigon recently mailed to all of its policyholders a package to help them understand the Trigon Demutualization. Any company that had a Trigon Blue Cross Blue Shield insurance policy in force as of June 30, 1996 is entitled to vote on the conversion plan. The ballot must be returned by September 6, 1996. The voting consists of two major questions: 1) Are we for or against the Company's Plan of Demutualization to convert to a stock company? The conversion plan will not become effective unless it receives the affirmative vote of more than two-thirds of all validly cast votes of policyholders, and is approved by the SCC. Trigon's Board of Directors unanimously recommends this conversion. They feel that this conversion will enable them to raise the necessary capital to stay competitive in the health care field, particularly with out of state HMO's. 2) Do you want to receive your allocation in stock or in cash? The Plan is structured to give allocations in stock. You can chose to take cash at the conversion instead of stock, but if there is insufficient cash to pay all members, then Trigon will allocate the available cash among the members. Any stock taken at conversion must be held for at least six months. There are still many unanswered questions related to this conversion. The attached release from VACO addresses many of the questions. FISCAL IMPACT: The preliminary estimate of shares of stock that the County and the County Schools will receive is 49,791. Trigon estimates that the market value of the stock after conversion will be $11 a share. This would equal a total market value to Roanoke County and Roanoke County Schools of $547,700. m:\finance\common\board\ 8-27-96b.rpt August 27, 1996 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff would request that the Board affirm that the Director of Finance, as the fiscal agent for the County and the County Schools Self-Insured Health Insurance Plans has authority to make the decision on these ballot questions in the best interest of both plans. At the current time, the recommended answers would be as follows. 1) Based upon our advise from Slabaugh Morgan White (the insurance consultant for both the County and the County Schools insurance plans) staff recommends approving the Demutualization Plan. In addition, we recommend taking the allocation in stock. Our consultants feel that there will not be sufficient cash at the conversion to cover all demands, and the policyholders will have to take a lesser amount. 2) Dividing this stock in an equitable basis with the schools in a manner consistent with our joint health insurance policies. If Trigon cannot provide a breakdown of the shares, we will divide the shares based upon the number of participants in the plan at June 30, 1996. 3) We recommend holding these shares as an asset of the self-insured health insurance reserves until such time as it becomes clear whether it is more advantageous to sell the shares (after the six month holding period) or to keep them and invest the dividends back into the self insured health insurance reserves. All savings will be recognized through the normal budgetary process with the next year's allocation to the Health Insurance Fund. If within the next week, we receive information that would change this action, I will notify the Board members individually. Since the ballot must be returned by September 6, 1996, there will not be another Board meeting before the mailing of the ballot. SUBMITTED BY: • i~~~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) APPROVED: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION Motion by: Bob L. Johnson to approve staff recommendation, and Ms Hyatt to keep Board fully informed cc: File Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Joseph Sgroi, Director, Human Resources VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy ~ Harrison ~? _ Johnson ~ Minnix x Nickens x m:\financelwmmon\board\ 8-27-96b.rpt August 27, 1996 Virginia Association of Counties To_ Counties involved in the Trigon Demucualizatian Counties with school divisions involved in the Trigon Demutualization From: Ellen Davenport, VACo~ Subj.: Trigon 17emutualization Date: August 2l, 1996 Last week, Trigon mailrrl m all golic~•holders a paclca~,gc co help d•iuu ur~clcrstand and evaluate then plan to corzvcrt from a mutual insurer to a stock company. IfLu had a T~g~~lue C~hss Blur Shied insurance„policy ~f4rce as ~f]uae 34 1 9C X~•wiL ~~r entitled to vote on whether or nit to~cprove th.c cor~vcrsion~Ian. 't'he conversion plan ~vi~l not become e~cctive unless it is approved by the Scatc Corporation Commic~inn; a public licaiiug is scheduled by the State (:;orooration Comrrussxon on Monday,, September 9 at 10:00 a.m. Before the public hearing, cwo_thirds of the policy-holders rnust approve the c-.nnvrzsion, nr~d Trigon enclosed with chc.ix mailing a proxy form for you to fill out and send in ur~Iess you plan to attend the September 6 meeting and cast your vote in person. If you hid ~ ~'ri~on $luc Cross $l~ Sliirlc[ inc»,~nr~r pal ~r jn foret of l.7ecember ~I 1~9~~u will bC ent in Mme c~~es cash at conv rsi n i~, acchan~c for ,fir membcrshi inrrrtcr ;~ ' c ~ r. Trigon hss enclosed with each policyholder's mailing an est<rnate o~ the nurnber of shares you are cntided to receive at conversion. Trigon also enclnsr~i a card for you to indicate w•hcthcr y~au preker to take cash instead of stock, and to send this card back with the proxy card wwhich is due by September 6. Since the Trigon mailing, VACo has received several questions about the conversion. Frequently asked quesuoas and their arsswcrs airs vcttl'utccl uii ~hc following page. Also cue:lwcd is a preliminaxy spreadsheet done in May which shows estimates of shares allocated to school divisions. Please give me a call at (804) 343-2503 if you have other questions, and I will be glad rv iae:~r:c~li tbcm for you. VA ASSOC OF COUNTIES Fax~804-788-0083 Aug 21 Can local $ov~rnmercxs o:trn stoclr? On Aug+ys~ IG, V.ACu aalul tL~ Vu}~uua AuurnCy General's office if localities ca,n own stock. According to Gail Jaspen in the Attorney General's office, localities can restive stock aad hold oz~ to stock until such tune that they wish to dispose of it, but localities cannot trade the stock or sell it to buy other stock. According to 1aspen, localities should not feel that they are being forced to accept cash instead of the stock. i~hen would thQ sinck or cash be available? Tliguu ulric,i•~Ix wllu 1-rir,Cad ~liC spGCaal Crcncral Assembly Co~namittee studying the disposition of Trigon Stack on August 19 said that the SCC should make its decision about the conversion between October 1 and October 15.Once their decision is rendered, there is a 30 day appeal period. Assuming approval of the conversion, the initial public offering of the stock should he made in late 1996 or early 1997, depending on market conditions. Any entities which choose to receive cash insuad of stock rxrould receive it after the irurxal, public afferin~; however if su{1'icicnt cash is not available to pay cash to all eligible members, then Trigon will allocate available cash accordia~g co a pteilc~~ruiiuGCl sc:liGC1uIC (sec i~nformarion begrnninao with "Cash elections" beginning on bottom of page 22 0£ Me.+nber Information Book 1). Q»ce the initial ~ublic o~enng is made, all shares at common stock will be subJect to a six-month "lockup' period, or a six month freeze on selling the stork. ,Cl~nul~ rlu tabu ctn~b or ~nsh~ Trigon stock is currenrly trading at between $b.50 to $1S•5'0 per shar~e,tand Trigon estimates that the stuck will be worth appn-n+~~,trly $11.00 Yes Jlldlc iiL tl1G uu1G V! tl1C t1C.177.[1LUalIZaIIOn. Localities need co talk to their financial advisors to determine if they wish m take .cash at the tithe of the conversion, or to receive stock which would be suoject to the six month lockup period. mould any f~sancial bene~its of she demusuallizatio~c have to accrue to current or previous plan particijrantc? Another quesrion asked of the Attorney General's oElice. on August 16w"as whether any financial benefits from the denxutualization would need to accrue to curroszt ar tV~1X1C1 1Jldil 11:i1111:1~311ES. The Attorney Gcncral is still researching this issue, bus believes that the answer would depend on how each locality's individual plan is structured. Under ~lt:i5A, when assets of a plan are returned back, they have to accrue to the benefit of the plan. Again, localities are urged to talk to their financial advisor to determine how their health plan is designed and whether the EItISA regulations a.pPly_ If oscr school division rs slstal to bencftt utrder tltc demasruxlizrttion, cars tlic local gooerrsrl~ars6 interte, pt the atnch or crrs~b? A number of school divisions arc slated to benefit from the Trigon conversion. Any stock resulting from the dcamutualization will accrue to the plan policyholdex, which is usually the school division_ However, whrnewcr school divisions do restive cash or later convert stock to cash, school divisions will nerd to adjust their budgets and request a eaurlty appropriation to spend nc~ raone}-. Counties may want to take the opportunity to discuss with school divisions how the windfall from Trigon will Lc spcu~, noel i~Clw.aliu.~ Iw:at sharC ro sehovls can be adjusted accordingly. - ~- ~ VA ASSOC OF COUNTIES Fax:804-788-0083 Rug 21 'y~ 2~~1~ r.V~~u~ TRIGON BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD Demutualization Distribution Selected Groups Eztimated based on prRliminary 5113/96 Data (P/eese Naie Ths Information is UNAUDITED! KING GEORGE COUNTY 34,765 SPOTSYLVANIA COUN I~Y 222,309 NTY 315 33 STAFFORD COt.fNTY 216,301 175 176 ROANOKE C TY SURRY COUNTY , 29,946 HAMPTON ROCKINGHAM COUNTY , 792 172, FREDERICK COUNTY 27,661 110 27 RUSSELL COUNTY 153x808 711 130 COVINGTON WARREN COUNTY . 26,932 PITTSYLVANIA COUNTY MONTGOMERY COUNTY , 117,530 I 3 DICKENSON COUNTY 115,241 g CHANAN COUNTY 26,3 1 DANVILLE TY 1 10,430 446 109 PAGE COUNTY R 25,525 6 I'RlNCE WIL i/~M COUN , 136 98 LGE OUNTY GREENSVI 26 24, CHESAPEAKE FRANKLIN COUNTY , 94,120 ESSEX COUNTY PUDLIC 23,846 RICHMOND r.ITY 91,137 GLOUCESTER COUNTY 23,66fi 375 22 SMYTH COUNTY 90,130 205 77 FLOYD COUNTY WESTMORELAND COUNTY , 21,604 HALIFAX COUNTY CITY OF MANASSAS , 73,471 YORK COUNTY 21,573 LEE COUNTY 72,702 FAUaUIER COUNTY CITY OF FRFbERICKSBURG Z1,323 21 ,222 QREENE COUNTY 71,761 835 68 GALAX 19,563 ORANGE COUNTY PATRICK COUNTY , 66,438 WAYNESBORO 18,383 743 16 WYTHE C"aUN TY 64,275 225 59 RICHMOND COUNTY MIDDLESEX COUNTY , 16,355 TAZEWELL COUNTY , 399 56 MATHEWS COUNTY 16,045 NEWPORT NEWS MECKLENRURG COUNTY , 55,2fi1 YORK COUNTY 15,874 025 14 AMHERST COUNTY 54,898 565 53 STAUNTON BUCKINGHAM COUNTY , 13,675 SUFFaLK FLUVANNA COUNTY , 50,139 CHARLOTTESVILLE 13,350 13 146 CITY OF VIRGINIA BF_A~ 45 248 CUUN rY , 11 171 NORTHAMPTON COU ; NORTON KING WILLIAM COUNTY , 19 933 ROCKBRIDGE COUNTY 44,624 996 43 COLONIAL BEACH , APPOMATTOX COUNTY , 784 39 CUMBERLAND COUNTY $,756 , MApISC_~N COUNTY ROANOKE COUNTY/SCHOOLS 39,147 DiNWiDDIE COUNTY 7,322 7 082 NORTHUMBERI~.ND COUNTY 37,913 GILES f'nUNTY UEEN COUNTY KING AND O ' 6,218 QRAYSON COUNTY LANC~'-STER COUNTY 37,845 37,s~2 . ~owHATAN COUNTY 5.696 719 4 BRIST01- 37,212 CHARLES CITY COUNTY , ~ 7'15 CHAR~OTT~ COVN7Y ~5,94~ NOTTOWAI( COUNTY - - ACTION N0. ITEM N0. / ! ~"~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 27, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Requests for Public Hearing and First Reading for Rezoning Ordinances Consent Agenda COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: The first reading on these ordinances is accomplished by adoption of these ordinances in the manner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions, rather approval satisfies the procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public hearing and second reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public hearing on these ordinances is scheduled for September 24, 1996. The titles of these ordinances are as follows: 1) An ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to construct a religious assembly facility, located on Edgebrook Road, 0.33 mile west of Thompson Memorial Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Salem Church of God. 2) An ordinance to rezone 1.11 acres from AR to I-1 to expand an existing custom manufacturing facility, located at 2056 Loch Haven Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Daniel Peters. 3) An ordinance to rezone 2.45 acres from R-1 to R-3 to allow four lots to be served by a private roadway, located on the west side of Old Cave Spring Road and the south side of Cave Spring Lane, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the petition of Jeffrey Maronic Inc. MAPS ARE ATTACHED; MORE DETAILED INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE IN THE CLERK'S OFFICE. }~ I- 3 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: (1) That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of these rezoning ordinances for the purpose of scheduling the second reading and public hearing for September 24, 1996. (2) That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth as Items 1 through 3, inclusive, and that the Clerk is authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action. Respectfully submitted, ~~~~~ ~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Action Motion by No Yes Abs Eddy Harrison Johnson Minnix Nickens ~ G~ ~/Z ! ~~ L CV For staff use only COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 date receive 7 23 ~~ re eived by: appli anon fee: ~a.`° ~ PC(BZA dater' ~ ~ placards issued: BOS date: Case Number: Q Check type of application filed (check all that apply): O REZONING ~7 SPECIAL US7= O VARIANCE Applicant's name: ~tYg~iesf ~~s~cia~eslArchitects, pC Phone: 342-4002 Address• ~ - ,~E~ P_O: Box X034, Roanoke Vir inia Zip Code: 24005 Owner's name:. ~ r~ of God Phone: 387-2068 Address: 600 Craig Avenue, Salem, Va. Zip Code: 241 53 Location of property: Tax Map Number: 35.04-2-54 Rt . 1r1, 5 4 Er3gebsook Road, 1. / 3 Magisterial District: il t f Rt 311 h taw m e wes o . ompson T Memorial Community Planning Area: Glenvar Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: R g _ 4 ~ acres Existing Land Use: Vacant 41 2 , 0 7 7sq.ft. :.~;-. Proposed Zoning: R_1 For Staff Use on/y Proposed Land Use: Use Type: Religious Assembly Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES X NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES X NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES N/A NO Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please checfc if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT 13E ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSWG OR INCOMPLETE. ws v Consultation Application Justification ws v ws v 8 1 /2" x 1 1" concept plan Application fee ~.~-~ Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable z` Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners l hereby certify that / am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner. `` ,, ~-'~' Owner'sOwner's Signature~i~/r~ ~ / C~--CrE%!~/,~ ~ / C~--CrE"_'~r For StaN Use Only: Case Number ~ I I . . . . . . . . . . ............................:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:.:.:.:.:::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::.:::::: ::::: 1 • ' ~~ .:. ... Applicant The Planning Commission will study rezoning and .special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change iri terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. _ Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. This project is a religious assembly facility to be located on 9.46 acre site for Salem Church of God. The site is located at approximately 1/3 mile west along E.dgebrook Road (Rt. 1150) from the intersection with Thompson Memorial and adjacent I81. This request is for a special use permit for the Master Plan of Multi:,phase building program with an ultimate size of 42,000 SF with a seating capacity for 1,000. This facility will aid in the creation of a convenient, attractive and harmonious community and reduce over all land use density, without increase to the public services. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. Religious assembly facilities are permitted by the zoning ordinance by special use permit and is generally consistant with the comprehensive plan. This property has a purchase contract subject to special use permit approval. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properies, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. The proposed project will have minimal impact on the adjoining properties j with regard to water, sewer, schools or fire rescue. Traffic alonc ` Edgebrook Road (Rt. 1150) will increase with this facility but will be concentrated at other than peak times, primarily Sunday mornings and evenings and some limited weekday use. Adequate on site parking at 3.6/1 i seat is proposed (4/1 seat required). Storm water run off will be contained prior to discharge under I81. Septic system and well water will be provided until public services are available. WATER & SEWER SERVICE REQUEST FORM DATE : '1 l Gi • ~ ~ - _ APPLICANT ~TFORMATION (Please Type or Print) N-~ /~~ ~ ~ coMPLETE MAILING A_pPL SCANT : ~t~Pm~ ~ 2.!.H- o~ ADDRESS : ~jp G j2/~ t Gt ~ E PxoNE : Fj 40 X81 20 68 ~,~I,EM `/,o , 24i ~ 3 OWINER: ADDRESS: PF-~ONE AGENT : 'D...)~PF12Y I~f~R kHll,l_ f~1AADDRESS : ~oSro~L,N( QV~ ~~ }-~ UGi E-4 ~j /~~50 G i ~Tt~ A~ l-t ITEGTj PfiONE : ~d.o a42 c~c~2 ~.OA1J0 IC.~ ~/~ ~ 2~o I~ SITE INFORMATION DEVELOPMENT NAME : gd l.~-.i( G ~{tJ 2CN OF Capp nn nn L-CCATION (FURNISH COPY OF MAP) : ~12T llGjO~ ~¢~U~C~ b~ 1~3 VY~t.~Q. w~ I,~. TAX MAP NO .: 35 . d 4 - ~- - 5~ ACREAGE : q , ~~ zoNED : t2 - i TOTAL UNI Ts : N ,~ TOTAL LOTS : N,o REQUESTED SERVIt~S WATER FACILITIES : COUNTY: t ~ AVP 1 L wEZL: SEWER FACILITIES: COUNTY: ~ F AVA1l~ SEPTIC SYSTEM: / TS BUILDING TO BE SPR.Z~IXLED7 ~ p ~ FLOW REQUIRED? G.P.M. DESCRIPTION OF WORK (Include any Specific Questions} In~~.tQ7f' v2tA.~.no c° _ ~ Q.Q.rr~~ (n.a~Q 1 -- -~ X000 ~5) ~i~ SI A F ate' ** APPLICATION MUST BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY BEFORE IT CAN BE PROCESSED . ALL xIG~ILIGHTED SECTIONS MUST BE COMPLETED OR THIS _ FORM WILL BE RETURNED . _ . OQ90 y~\ •uo~ y°~ /„oyl / '~vollfi ~ /~O ~i~ ~`_~ ._ O U 0 0 r z aoo'ars'i O ~ !! a z ~ ~ ~ 1 a ~ > ° ~ z 0 ~ ~ } ~ U ~ ~ WG (... W Q U < ~ w O W > ~ Y O x W 0 O = W a ~ w t O ua^ i < ~ w . O w0a ~1 ~` ~M L` O r W w o ~ < ~ W = c g=u < W Z ~ J O < ! = W r~~7< j < O O S W O t~j/ OJO < W u W u~wou ~V` ~~ 0 F ==o i ~ Y ! = V ~ Y J O = u J w J J J W J J W ~ v « u cssc~ i J J L 7 I;~~~ Illii r J W r = w = J G W ~ ~ J yy~~ < W J i = ~ ~ J > J ~ J W J Vt~ H O ~ O < u~a~1 ~ r t I ~ ~ r~ i 1 ~-' W W J ] W p i O W J ~ < i O O J` O W xs~ ~~~~ ~a~ .~ aaa x~~ ~ ~ ~ .,~, ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~- ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ o ~a n 1 ^ ^ O 1 _ ~ ~ 1 ~~~~ .~°~~~ ~ . ~ ~ ~~ 1 ~~ ~ ~g1 ~ ~ 4p g Q s l ~~ t ~ ~ ~'0Q'!~ my r r „, . h tn'~t _ ,~~, 1 1 '~,~~ 1 ~ ~ `~~ - ~ ~ ~ ~, - ,, 're ~L•8 N' P, 1 a ae ~ , \~ ~~ s ~ 1 , -_ ag ;~~'~ v ~~ ~ S ,'....; ~ _ ..~-_ _n ~,_ - ~" _ - ! ti sea _~ ~~ ~_ I 1-~l --1 -/ D / 2 .a A e , I Q ' ~ / ~ Y o O ~ I s i a(r C ~ / ~ ' C - W 1 o ~-1~ . ~ LOOAc lD) ` 1 ~~~ `o / \ ^ ~ ~ ~ ~E o ~ \ Y` * DEPAR~~1'I' OF PLP1VNIi\'G SALEM CHURCH OF GOD - SPECIAL USE PERMIT ~' AND ZONING .~•. 35.04-2-54 .,, H- i NORiN ~.~ For staff use onlvi-- /~'' COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 5204 Bernard Dr. P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 ( 540` 772-2068 FAX (540) 772-2108 date re~ dy receive by: f // ['!!~ ee• application f d te: PC/B placards issued: BOS d te: G ~ 9 y z Case Number: `~M~ ~...~ `~ Check type of application filed (check all that apply): ~ REZONING ^ SPECIAL USE ^VARIANCE Applic~t's name: Daniel A Peters Address: 2056 Loch Haven Drive Roanoke Va Phone:562_ 1675 Zip Code:2~019 Owner's name: Address: S~`~ Phone: Zip Code: Location of property: Tax Map Number: 36.08-- 3--~-~- RQ1-o;= 3U.~,-3-5 2056 Loch haven Dr Magisterial District: Catawba Community Planning Area: ~~s CF~e~ Size of arcel Existing Zoning: A/R {, ~~ acres Existing Land Use: y`~_ ~.s,~ sq.ft. Proposed Zoning: Industrail . ~- ,~~ ~ Proposed Land Use: For Stafi Use On/y use Type: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES XX NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria far the requested Use Type? YES XX NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being pro~~ered with this request? YES ~ NO Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT EE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. - - ws v ws v ws v Consultation 8 1 /2" x 1 1 " concept plan ~ Application fee Application "~'t~ Metes and bounds description ' : Pro~~ers, if applicable Justification ~ ~ Water and sewer applicationl, Adjoining propery owners r J~ l hereby certify that / am either the owner of the property or the o+~~r~r's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and ~,onsent of the owner. Owner's Signature: ,.,{'~~ ~ For Staff Use Only: Case Number ~~~ Applicant Daniel A Peters The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. We feel this request would allow us to expand our small business, therefore keeping tax revenues and other revenues in Roanoke County. In as much as American Electric Power is nearby and Haniging Rock Animal Hospital is in sight of our property, this request in not unjustified. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. The physical apperance of this building will conform to other projects in this area. We expect to use masonry and vinyl siding with asphalt shingle roof,landscaped and kept as neat as possible. We expect to conform to all guidelines and policies of Roanoke County as much as possible. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. There will no particular impact on the property itself except for the physical apperance of the building itself. Landscaping as the yard and garden are expected to stay as is.There will be slight changes in contour grades to accomcdate the building. Public services such as water and sewer are not available. There will be no increase in traffic. No other services should be affected. tl~ X11 ill Q- ~r ~`: ~, Yl .C •; - ~,i -. i 1 ~~ - i a ~~ u ~ --- E- o ~:`~- ~o~ _~•, .f 7 - - ~. ~}~:-~ - ; -~ =~ , 0 ._ ~" ;' d ~ :' D ~! ~~ `.\ ' ~.r O ~.o ~I~ m~z '~,b[' II3 ~~ m_ ~N ~~ n~'~ ~~~~ . ;~ ~~I 1 .S 6L 0 _ i `fin V' N I _=1 ~~~, J _ ~ _ b ~ .Qu ~ o `l' _ ~ ~~ 1 ._ _ ~. ~ ~~ ul ,.~~. w:4 L~! ~ ~ ~ ~4 ;1`~`Y"~ - -t s nv •~: ~ ~isrt~/ll~G ~sl ,, . 1 , 8 ~- m o .S~ J ~ ~ ~ d z U . o ~L o%z ~ . , ~~ ' `cA ~ Q f a ~ ~ ~ O Q Q ~ O ^ 4 lu ~ ~ Q N ~ m ~ ~~C N a a. q , Q ul~" ~ a ~r ~ , ~ I _ ~- • w~ ~ {{~ ,, ~~ ~ i ~ Q ~ ~ _~~ _ ~ 'a ~~ L 3 ~- N m ~- M, v ~I c~ ~ ~ - ;.:.:._ . _ - ---- - /~1„l~0, ~z o ~~ fN y,~~~is ~ H1n~ ~ (' o~~; rya - O.'.~Z o7Z S (ir' -' -J _ ~,LcaS~ ,SS _ Q~ O~(~ ~.v ~ Quo ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ IT"7. Daniel A Peters Conditions to be proffered: 1) no materials will be stored outside 2) no signage will be placed adjacent to Loch Haven Drive ;~ N~a ~= \// s~'` / \~ / ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ,z ro.~ i `~~~ j i ~, ~" 1. ~~~~ 1 ~ ~, ~~~ ; ,r~ ."._ `~ 2. ~ \ \ .. \,.., o.~ ~ ~ o t\ o ` "o_ \ pfd ~, ~ DANIEL A. PETERS _ ~ * DEPA.F?TMEiv'T OF PI~.NNIl~'G AND 7,oNNG AR TO I -1 i . 36.08-3-6; p/o 36.08-.3-5 ,r COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 rAX (703) 772-2030 a.~~; . 7 ~o ~6 ~.,. ctaff rrca nnly date re eived: recei edg y: ! G ~ G ~- applicat' f ?CBZ' da e: .3 y d placards issued: BCS d ~: J Case Number: / .~, Proposed Zoning: R ~3 : _. __ _ _ ~ For Staff Usa Gn/y Multi-Famil Residential to allow four ` UsaType: Proposed Land Use: y lots to be served by a private roadway and the elimination of access easement to ublic street. ~~~ ~ ~~ ~~' Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES x NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. x Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria fcr the requested Use Type? YES NO 1F N0, A VARIANCE 1S REQUIRED FIRST. x if rezoning request, are ct?nditions being proffered with this request? YES NO . y.; . ~. . ::s:i ter:. :•t• • ~ .~ `.=iii rtii Variancs_of. $eciix~cs(s) None -" ..r .. of.the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: ~ ~ a~ica~tj c~~~ Pl$a~e chetitii enslo5ed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCE?TED IF ANY OF TF~SE i;CMS AR>E 1v~1SSNVG Old INEOMPLtTt~ • Hs Y aus v rrt v CO{tsaltation x '$ 1 !Z' x 11 " cgncept plan x Application fee x ,, x Qpp6catiott x hrl~te~ end bout'tds description x "-<, Proffers, if applicable x Justifica;~ Wat2r and sewer application x Adjoining propery owners 1 hereby ~rtl~ that / am erttrer the~owne~gl tf~~ra~eny or the owner's agent or contract purc.~aser and am actinD with the knowledge ak~d Consent dt the owner. Owner's Signature: Jef~y S . Ma nic~nc . b Y l Ct 1.c Q ~~-Q-~• f Counsel' ~~ ~ t ., For Staff Usa Only: Case Number :i:_iii`?'::?::::~:_~~?;:;~~?~?~?~~,:: ?i.E:Ei:EiEiiEiiid:ibEi`::i:`:::EasiiE::•.`:Eli:iEi:i`i2^SiiE'``'''i```~`'``'~~'`'~i```"`~"`````~~"'~~~~~~~~~~~ ~.EEi~•~~~~~ i~~~~`~ ..................~.~._..........,...c.:...:...:...:..•..:..:..::.::...p...~.~.~...:.:.:..:..:-:.:~:2:::2:E:::i:i:::::E:i::i::iii:i::::::::::~::::E:S:::E:E:i:i:.: Jeffrey S . ~iaronic , Inc . Applicant The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms or public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the fallowing questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classii~cation in the zoning ordinance. The property will remain as currently subdivided, but a rezoning to R-3 will allow access to four of the lots by one private roadway, thus eliminating one entry onto the public road. This would: significantly enhance the safety factor. Please explain how the project conforms to the genera( guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke C;ounry Comprehensive Pfan. It complies with current zoning and is subdivided as per current: a, Qain, a rezoning to R-3 would simply eliminate one entry; zonin' P'o onto the public road. Please describe the impact(s) of the request cn the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, oarlcs/recreation, and fire/rescue. It will 'nave rip negative imo_ act on the property itself , o:. the adjoining properties, the general area or public se_-J_ce facilities. The only impact will be to eliminate one access =pad onto the public street, an important safety consideration. f f {-3 VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY Re: Rezoning of a 4.068 acre parcel of ) land, generally located on the west ) side of Old Cave Spring Road, S.W. ) and the south side of Cave Spring ) PETITION Lane, S.W., within the Windsor Hills ) Magisterial District and recorded ) as Parcel 76.20-3-7 on the Roanoke ) County Tax Records. ) To: The Honorable Supervisors of Roanoke County WHEREAS, your petitioner, Jeffrey S. Maronic, Inc.respectfully files this Petition pursuant to §§30-14, et seq., of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance and in accordance with the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended: 1) Petitioner is the owner of the above-referenced parcel of land. 2) The property is currently zoned under the provisions of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance as R-1, Low Density Residential District. 3) The property is designated Neighborhood Conservation in the Future Land Use Guide of the Roanoke .County Comprehensive Development Plan. 4) Your Petitioner desires to have this property rezoned as R-3 Medium Density Multi-Family Residential District for the purpose of developing a single family subdivision containing single family dwellings in accordance with the development plan previously approved except that Lots 9, 10, 11 and 12 will be served by one private roadway instead of an access easement across lot 1, subject to proffered conditions. WHEREFORE, your Petitioner respectfully requests that the Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County be amended and that the above- referenced parcel of land be rezoned as set forth in Paragraph 4 above. FURTHER, your Petiticner respectfully requests that this Petition be referred to the Roanoke County Planning Commission for its consideration and recommendation. ,. ~• 3 VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY Re: Rezoning of a 4.068 acre parcel of ) land, generally located on the west ) side of Old Cave Spring Road, S.W. ) pROFFER and the south side of Cave Spring ) OF Lane, S.W., within the Windsor Hills ) CONDITIONS Magisterial District and recorded ) as Parcel 76.20-3-7 on the Roanoke j County Tax Records. To: The Honorable Supervisors of Roanoke County The Petitioner, Jeffrey S. Maronic, Inc., hereby voluntarily proffers to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, the following conditions to the rezoning of the above-referenced parcel of land: 1) The rezoned parcel will be developed in accordance with the subdivision plans as currently approved by Roanoke County with two exceptions: a) The access easement across Lots 1 and 9 will be eliminated. b) Lots 9 and 10 will be served by the same private road that currently serves the retention pond and Lots 11 and 12. 2) The homeowners association which has been established to provide for the maintenance of the private road serving Lots 11 and 12 and the stormwater management will be responsible for said roadway when it is also serving Lots 9 and 10. Respectfully submitted, JEFFREY S. MARO IC, INC. i 4 BV : J Counsel for etiti e s Carr L. Kinder, Jr. Esq. KINDER & FOGEL, P.C. P.O. Box 2795 Roanoke, VA 24001 (540) 982-1755 .F ~ * le \ _ r _ _ ~ t - *. _ , - 7 ~w t~1c" ^'t q[~~,,''. ~ s ~ 'fit K• ~ ~ ~, ,'~.''"~{ x~:''.;'k .-y= ' .: y~ -, _ - - -.~4. _, . ._ _ ,, , ~. r _._-., Q .. ~ ~ .. - _ti - ~~ ,. \ -. :_z .- I __ _ f ~. _.. I 1 -' ~~ - .' - ~ \ ~ / ~ \\ \ ~ 1\-_\ . , I I I ~ ,_ ,. _.. ~ ._ .. I ~ ..- . } \ ~ ~~~- ~ f ` \ ~ ' ~ (.- - o ~ - ~ ' ~ , ~ ~ 1 \~ - - ._ 1~ -- -r_ -! - r - ._ ,. , 0 0,~5 i 3 i ~ - ~~ _ . r ~ :~~ - - - - - ._ - ,. ,,~ I _ ~ \ ~ , .~ - .; _ _ ~ i l~ \ x `~~ ~/ ~ o r 1 ~. ...r_. _ ~ - - ~. - , ~ ~ 9 .± - - ~. .f o! - ~~ .. ', .- _ .. , ' ~ - -. -+ --~ • ~~ ~ ~ - u~3 0 ; , _ ~ ~3 ~ - `L ~ ~~ ~0- N N SON ~\~ ~ ~'; ~ No . 193 217 ~ - l g g' . ~i '~ ---__ v~,%-c~ ~ ~~ ~ \v- , .15„ ~ _ -_ --- _ 380._---- '~ ~_ ~ - --_ 1~ ~ ~'C7 ~ _ o-.,\ ~~ 3 i N .: o~ ~ o. 0~ SPRING - y.7 _~ i ! ~ ~ _ r _ / \ ` ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ ! ~ '~ Jess -' ~ - ~ :' t a~ ~ ` ~ ~ 1 ~~~ S? ' ~ 'tom- ~~ 1 i~ I ~~, i 0 3 / .~ - J ~ C}' :~ ~ ~ ~ r m, 4 I rN - ` ' I ~ ~ ~~ I _ _ - - x __ _ ~ o \~ ~ _~yn `. __ . 1,~ '` ~~ ~ ~ ~ i X ~ \ ~ ~~ a _ L.. `~ 7 •~. ! ~,. ` e •~ Z ~ , ' 4 .' ~f a~,~. ~ ~F~ '~3~ ~-• ~ { f ~ ~ 3~~' ii~~~ '~~~ ,,r~"' t dr% i ~ 1 ; I ~. ./~' ~ i 1, ~ ~ r i .i ,. : ~~ Nri~pO as'~ ~"l~~ 11 f`'r~"i r `' 1 ~ . ~~ ~~ ' 1' ii ~ i i .. is •s-.~Jr.~,,,.o ~ ~~~ ~~ r ' ~Q ~ ~ ~ i I 1 ~, \ \ \\ ~O \ ~.~I .Y~ J ~l ZI~ 1/ 2 w~~~~ ~ ~ 'fff. :3" ~ ~' -1 ~ ~ '~I ~ \` ~ 'I ~ ~ ~\~ ~~~ ; ~ ~~~ ~~~~ ~~\~ ~~I ~~ ~~~f 3 ~ E ~ ~~il_ .b.n „~r, t ~~ .__ ~~ . ,}\ ~ . Z` ~9H~$e~t~~jiy3 ~i ¢ao ~g; i~II41c° ~~s'~ ~~ ~- ~ ~ ~- €i ~. ~ ~ ~~ ~ \ ~F~ti~~l~~iti ~t ~ )3 ! C ~C R3j t~ .a2 . L ~a ~~~ i.:: 1~ gg 4,i YIC~ ~ J/ ,~ ~ iCG]~ cc gg Cj •~~ ~~~~` Isi~~~~ti~l~Ei ?S'- ' ~ ~~ Q 1 P tl ~ Ih , ,~, -., ~ i ~ iw ~'•' 9~`~- M~ w ~ V 6±l v ~~ ~ i~~~ t i1`~' ~ ~~~ r~ ;a~ ~ ~ I i~ _:. r' ~., ~~ •. 1,~ iF (~ 1 i~' ~ ~ ~ 1 •. { ' J- / _~~ ~. ; , °a , . c , ? a.. _Y~=--_ f ~ ~... -- -~,. 7r ~ - ~ / 3 :. 'l":~ q ow' yt ~ ; ~..~'~/ Il r ~..i ' ~ ~' _ 'r•• 3 U I~ -~ ---.~ ~ # ~ ~ ~: ~ ~ ~= -~ ,. ~ ~ ~ ; :.. t~: ~ }.. Sao ..' \_ . =~ ~~\ _y/,, V ~ i~z a d7 ; {3 ~ _ 1: i +t ~71 `~ 133 ~ =I~ 2~ uo~laans oixourn r(V"ld 1N3rid0~3tiO z o ~ ~f ~ = 4 0 4c 8}~ ~ y N a 3 Q9 ~ ~ i c~i 6~~~ i jj a~~1~ ~~~~ N ..~ c a3 .. ~ -~ f a~.+ ~- ~: .,:, •^1 N ;~,, .~, /: 3 ~c~ :.=~¢ 33i;i~ --'~'?: vf~3333 • `V Y n Y o~ ~ d ~~G ~s -~ ~ casr Roca • •rorn~~:Y' / ~I --~~~ --~ . r.Kri d IJry) ~~~ 662 '. .S <in.w.yJ F~~ Vim, }~~~~' ~S~;LE ~ l i ~ t _rvlow ~.o~ < ~~~.rn-`/ a~"++111~~ s,,~l*1 \~^ ~ ~ L p . ~ ~•c t `ice ~` .1 9 P V`44 ,4~J _-. ~P •b fr ~~. ~~,~• ,~,~ ~,y ~~ l~e~ `; \),, i dpi: ~~l Q~ is -~ • ;~. °E;^N HILL ~ ~~~ \ _ 1 `. ..ocr>r 419.-0 ~;' .:cross .~. ti .r~`~,. 0.$ISt ~DncU on ` ~ ~,J. ~sr ~ ~ •~; , 1, 3"~, i iS'I ~ ~ ~tl (F /° 6$] 1J-~ u'`"IItN~1~+ y 4`; `~~'``,P, yl VICINITY MAP ;~~g` ~ ~_ "~ oL~'~ ~- • ff-3 ~, t~ NORTH ,...~ - ~ ~ r - ~ ~ - Ig,rY 16 ~ of ' i 3b F ~y ~ 319(1 o~ ~ R I s ,~' ~^ 4~s , loo IOf f-+ ~ f • ~ Jat1 • ~' ~~~ N 1 le»7 \ ~ L30 AC "' ~ ~ 38 ~ z ` (~ y ~1 z~• 12 2. i ~ ' 6 ~ i'= Gorr soot fi oa ~ fsva ~ SQ~\ ~~ II ~~~. t 6 ~ ~ : / ,o0 1e * ~~ _ A1~0 ~ r•~ R ~ 1574 ~o~. `a ~ 1'1 • N VS ~ 1~ ..~ ~,. p ~ td,~ R-1 ~ r. wo ee i a 1929 ] f909 ¢ ~ tI/O ~ sOr2 ~~ b „ tlp7 9 8 ~ = ~ ~aoe ' `a~• 3 42 43 • - b ,9z *T ~ 5007 ' ~ ~+' 1921 ~~ `Q~a ~in4' 50 ~eiz ern ~ ~/1 //~~~ 1 ' ~ .e ~ 52 j0 j1e _ 8 •^ n~.r L~ m9: ..,,q..~'' ti~ » ,, ~a2z Rti 16 16 .~~ ~~ » ~z ~s 6 j .~ j- ,.~ 2 5 s9~6 ~ =~ yN •s~ 4. i ~ c+ ~~~_ JSd7 _ f9f0 •5 ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ 1932 a . _ 1 x 19 D ~ = = ttJO od / a s e', O n to Iw.n J~ S i° ~ 93 ~ ~ ~ Y c-z 5 1 ~ c6 .~,., :, g ~ ~ ~ . tsc+s L2 °...e _ JJ7t ' L4fiAc ~ ~ ~ \ ~~ 10 v ~ ~ ~3ze JSJJ '~ ;i17 L79AC r ~ ° ..+ ~as_et U 9003 y '2 S .~is22 J . ~ 11 y 6 f + _ ' 6 ~ p a g 0 I a~' w b 200AC r 9G ~ ~: 13.5 1!04 Ae R ••' ~ S - ~ , ~, ... •t0 ~ l G 14 ~~ ~ I _ ti , 1 ,~.i „~ <TS~ 13.6 ' S '~ .zl ~~/~ =j9- 'O' ' 1.33 ..c a ~Y .py ee e ~ 12 2 _ p ~ ~ Gmmon.edm a p ~ - 13.] . _ ~, ,o .s18 ` JJ ~- = 1 '' ~ ~ ~ C-Zc a~ o _ ~ ~ w.se s` - 1 - ,a LL Aso lm / f ~ .- '. -:. St :v('..• ° Cam. o/ Vtl \ '+ / - • ~" ~ 3 ~, 4 • ~ • ii ~,~ ~ sitJ -t taax ~ '~.~..~~~ .~°.Cdn.dYO. f Y' >' ~ a.» ~ s ' ; ~ JEFFREY MARONIC INC. DE~~„t?Ti1r1~I'I' OF PZ~.NNI\G R-1 TO R-3 ~ ~.~ : P1~1D ZONING 7 6.20 - 9 - 9 ; 10 ; 1 1 ; 12 .„ ' ~.oo• 540-344-8419 SIR SPEEDY Red Lane/llt. Seightg Civic ~~~- ~ ~-~ ,~~,I~ ~~ t . ,:, ~ 6 jc~a~ 'y4 ` ~,~~ ~~~r 976 PG1 AUG 26 '96 12:44 ~"} « 1 ~ . , ~jl~~~~ nn League August 26, 1996 Roanoke Caunty Board of Supervisors p, O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Dear Gentlemen: We are pleased to infoWm voted unanimously lnot to oppo~~ea~he meeting on August 20- 1996+ e request for a special use permit by the Salem Cl~urin facted~v ted construction of a new church on ragtorthe Board of Supervisors far unanimously to express our suppo this project. However+ we do hope that Edgebrook Road E gineering resurfaced as we were assured of this by De artment. Sa far, we have seen no indication of activity underway. We would appreciate your assistance in prompting ~;'~oT to take action on this matter. Thank you for your attention on the above matters. JRH/peh CC: Cordially yours, ~" ,7ahn R. Huff a President Red Lane/Mt• xeights Civic ~a}ague Elmer Hodge- Roanoke County Administrator .._-.. ~_-.l AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 27, 1996 ORDINANCE 082796-7 AUTHORIZING CONVEYANCE OF A 10' GAS LINE EASEMENT TO ROANORE GAS COMPANY ACROSS PROPERTY KNOWN AS THE ROANORE COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE CENTER OWNED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WHEREAS, the Roanoke County General Services Department is constructing improvements and wash bay facilities on property owned by the Board of Supervisors, said property being located on Kessler Mill Road (Va. St. Route 630), in the Catawba District of the County of Roanoke and in the City of Salem, known as the County Public Service Center; and, WHEREAS, Roanoke Gas Company requires an easement for the gas line to serve the new facilities, and has requested that said easement extend through the property to the western property line, adjacent to an existing 20' sanitary sewer line as shown on the attached drawing marked Exhibit A, in order to provide for future gas service to properties located behind the Service Center; and, WHEREAS, the proposed easement will serve the interests of the public and is necessary for the public health, safety, and welfare of citizens of the County of Roanoke. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance. A first reading of this ordinance was held on August 13, 1996, and a second reading was held on August 27, 1996. 1 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the interests in real estate to be conveyed are hereby declared. to be surplus, and are hereby made available for other public uses by conveyance to Roanoke Gas Company for the provision of gas service in connection with facilities at the Roanoke County Public Service Center and for provision of gas service in the future to surrounding properties. 3. That donation of an easement for a gas pipeline or lines (with appliances and accessories useful and necessary in connection therewith) across the Public Service Center property, as shown on the attached drawing marked Exhibit A, to Roanoke Gas Company is hereby authorized. 4. That the County Administrator or Assistant County Administrators are hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such further actions as may be necessary to accomplish this conveyance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 5. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Harrison to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. lton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 2 cc: Bill Rand, Director, General Services John Willey, Property Manager Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Gary Robertson, Director, Utility 3 ~~ o~ TRACT 'B' TRACT 'A' 10' GAS LINE 20' SEWER LINE EASEMENT EASEMENT .. .. -\ -.~ \ .\ ~\ . ~. ~ INr ~ ERSTATE 81 A 0 J ~ J `° .-, W ~ r Q' ~ W v~ J ~ ~ N W Y ~~ EXHIBIT A ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~'r' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 27,1996 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance authorizing the conveyance of a 10 foot gas line easement to Roanoke Gas company across a portion of the Public Service Center. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: /~ ~~~ (./ BACKGROUND: Roanoke Gas Company has requested an easement across a portion of the Kessler Mill public service facility. The purpose of the easement would be to extend service to an area of Roanoke County that is not presently served. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Roanoke Gas Company is asking the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors for a permanent gas line easement through the Kessler Mill facility. This would be an extension of an existing four inch line that serves the new wash bay building and would run approximately 200 feet further West to the property boundary. The proposed easement would be ten feet wide. Two parallel easements for water and sewer exist in the proposed gas easement corridor and would lie on either side of the gas line easement. The proposed easement would not affect any operation at Kessler Mill either current or future and would run through the unpaved parking area. Staff has consulted with the Public Facilities,Parks and Recreation, and General Services Directors and they are unopposed to granting the easement. Roanoke Gas would be responsible for all costs incurred during construction and repair or replace any damaged Roanoke County property to original condition. A map of the proposed and existing easements is attached along with a copy of the proposed ordinance prepared by the County Attorney's office. ~~ ALTERNATIVES: (1) Approve the request and grant the permanent easement. (2) Deny the easement request. (3) Modify the easement terms and include further stipulations as The Board may feel necessary. FISCAL IMPACT: None STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative one. Roanoke Gas was very co-operative during the construction of the new wash bay gas line and provided service and hook up at no cost to Roanoke County. Since the two existing easements effectively block any further development or construction on the site and the proposed easement would run between them it is felt that no damage to the utility of the property will occur. This can be viewed as an extension of services to Roanoke County citizens. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, r~ . n ~/ ~" ,~,~ hn D. Wille Elmer C. Hodge roperty Mana er County Administrator ----------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved Denied Received Referred To ( ) Motion by: ( ) ( ) Eddy Harrison Johnson Minnix Nickens 1 A AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 27, 1996 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING CONVEYANCE OF A 10~ GAS LINE EASEMENT TO ROANORE GA3 COMPANY ACROSS PROPERTY KNOWN AS THE ROANORE COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE CENTER OWNED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WHEREAS, the Roanoke County General Services Department is constructing improvements and wash bay facilities on property owned by the Board of Supervisors, said property being located on Kessler Mill Road (Va. St. Route 630), in the Catawba District of the County of Roanoke and in the City of Salem, known as the County Public Service Center; and, WHEREAS, Roanoke Gas Company requires an easement for the gas line to serve the new facilities, and has requested that said easement extend through the property to the western property line, adjacent to an existing 20' sanitary sewer line as shown on the attached drawing marked Exhibit A, in order to provide for future gas service to properties located behind the Service Center; and, WHEREAS, the proposed easement will serve the interests of the public and is necessary for the public health, safety, and welfare of citizens of the County of Roanoke. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance. A first reading of this ordinance was held on August 13, 1996, and a second reading was held on August 27, 1996. .J _" 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the interests in real estate to be conveyed are hereby declared to be surplus, and are hereby made available for other public uses by conveyance to Roanoke Gas Company for the provision of gas service in connection with facilities at the Roanoke County Public Service Center and for provision of gas service in the future to surrounding properties. 3. That donation of an easement for a gas pipeline or lines (with appliances and accessories useful and necessary in connection therewith) across the Public Service Center property, as shown on the attached drawing marked Exhibit A, to Roanoke Gas Company is hereby authorized. 4. That the County Administrator or Assistant County Administrators are hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such further actions as may be necessary to accomplish this conveyance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 5. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. ~.,' ~• ~~ o~ p TRACT 'B' TRACT 'A' 10' GAS LINE 20' SEWER LINE EASEMENT EASEMENT .. .. _~ -.~ •\ ~~ . ~. ~ INTFRSTgTE 81 f~ L~ .. 0 J ~ J ~0 ~ 4i ~ ~ ~ F W to J a N w Y Si EXHIBIT A r ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER ~ ~"~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 27, 1996 SUBJECT: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards ~'OUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: ~ GRIEVANCE PANEL Two year term of R. Vincent Reynolds will expire September 10, 1996. Mr. Reynolds has been contacted and indicated his willingness to serve another two year term. ~ METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT STUDY COMMITTEE At the July 9 joint meeting of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors and Roanoke City Council, both governing bodies agreed to the establishment of a Metropolitan Transportation District Study Committee. The committee would promote the creation of a transportation district which must be approved by the General Assembly, and educate the public on the need for the district. Each governing body was requested to appoint three citizens. When the committee is formed, the membership will appoint a seventh at-large member. At this time the Board is requested to appoint three citizens to represent the County on the committee. SUBMITTED BY: Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator KI-a Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Motion by: ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy _ Harrison _ Johnson _ Minnix _ Nickens _ LI-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 27, 1996 RESOLUTION 082796-8 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM L - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for August 27, 1996 designated as Item L - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 6, inclusive, as follows: 1. Confirmation of appointment to Industrial Development Authority. 2. Request for acceptance of Barley Drive, an extension of Barley Drive, plated under the "West Salem Forest Subdivision," into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 3. Request from the School Board to appropriate $75,000 to the School Grant Fund for the Roanoke area Tech Prep Consortium. 4. Request to appropriate funds for the rental of mobile units at Cave Spring Junior High School. 5. Donation of drainage easements in connection with the Green Valley Bond Project and improvements to the roadside drainage on Sunnyvale Street. 6. Resolution honoring the late Joan Lyons, Social Services Department, for over fourteen years of services to Roanoke County. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. 1 On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Consent Resolution, with Item 6 removed, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the resolution in Item 6 and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~~~~ Brenda J. H lton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Dr. Deanna Gordon, School Superintendent Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Vickie L. Huffman, Assistant County Attorney 2 ACTION NO. A-082796-8 a ITEM NUMBER L-1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 27, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the Industrial Development Authority. ~nrnJmv ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: The following nomination was made at the August 13, 1996 meeting: ~ Tnc~u~trial Development Authority Supervisor Johnson nominated J. Richard Cranwell to serve another four year term. His term will expire September 26, 2000. It is recommended that this appointment be confirmed by the Board of Supervisors. Submitted by, Approved by, ~~ Mary H. Allen, CMC Elmer C. Hodge Clerk to the Board County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson to No Yes Abs Denied ( ) abprove Eddy ~_ Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Harrison _~ Johnson _~ _ Minnix ~_ _ Nickens ~_ cc: File Industrial Development Authority L- THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, IN REGULAR MEETING ON THE 27TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1996, ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING: RESOLUTION 082796-8.b REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF BARLEY DRIVE, AN EXTENSION OF BARLEY DRIVE, PLATED UNDER THE "WEST SALEM FOREST SUBDIVISION" INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM WHEREAS, the streets described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(a), fully incorporated herein by reference, are shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, and WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised this Board the streets meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(A) to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote Moved By: S~.pervisor Johnson Seconded By: None Required Yeas: ~gerv;snrs Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson Nays: None A Copy Teste: Brenda J. Ho ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Virginia Department of Transportation ._ _ _... _ . _ ..._ _ . _ 43 . ~?B3 22.64 Ac '.c f*~ ~~ _/ ~~: ~~ / 4 . / 43;1~~ ~~ R0p~04~ w~ T.41 Ac 4/03 ~ ' ~~ ~``. roe/ ~. ~ ~/,a 43.8 ' : X76 Ac ~o5i .43.2 ----,..: "" 43 3 5.t6 Ac ~~n 43.9 ~o~i 43.4 8.03 ac ?05 Ac V ~ t 7.T7Ac .~srs _ .. .... ... ... 43.5. PROPOSED ADDITION SHOWN IN GRAY DESCRIPTION: 1) An extension of Barley Drive, Rt. 646, from intersection with railroad trestle to cul-de-sac. LENGTH: (1) 0.23 MILES RIGHT OF WAY: (1) 50 FEET ROADWAY WIDTH: (1) 28 FEET SERVICE : (1) 5 HOMES ROANOKE COUNTY Acceptance of Barley Drive, an extension of ENGINEERING & Barley Drive (SR 6461, platted under the INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT West Salem Forest Subdivision, into the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOTI Secondary System. a -~ r , ACTION # ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 27, 1996 AGENDA ITEM• Acceptance of Barley Drive, an extension of Barley Drive (SR 646), platted under the "West Salem Forest Subdivision," into the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) Secondary System. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: James Pearman, the developer of "West Salem Forest Subdivision," requests that the Board of Supervisors approve a resolution to the Virginia Department of Transportation requesting that they accept 0.23 mile of Barley Drive. Staff has inspected this road, with representatives of the Virginia Department of Transportation, and found this road to be acceptable. FISCAL IMPACTS: No County funding is required. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve a resolution to VDOT requesting that they accept the extension of Barley Drive into the Secondary Road System. - ~-C TTED B APPROVED BY: -riold Covey, Directo Elmer C. Hodge of Engineering & Inspe tions County Administrator --------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Eddy Harrison Johnson Minnix Nickens L~ ~~ THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, IN REGULAR MEETING ON THE 27TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1996, ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the streets described on the attached Additions Form SR-5 (a) , fully incorporated herein by reference, are shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, and WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised this Board the streets meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(A) to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote Moved By: Seconded By: Yeas: Nays: A Copy Teste: Mary Allen, Board Clerk w~ NORTH 43 ` 1Mi' ,C ~2e3 22.64 Ac ga~~a Rt 64 N / 4 / ~ . "~- fO,,~1~~ T. 4 ~ Ac ~,C1 ,i ~ ~ ~9~ Ac ~o~~ ~oee~ ~ ~ioo +iia 43.8 r S76 Ac ~ ~~~ ~osi ,~ 3 43.2 Kira 43.9 ~De/ '43.4 8.03 AC ~• 16 Ac 7.05~Ac wS1D .__.. .. _t _ . _ 43.5 .TT Ac ._, _ . _ _ PROPOSED ADDITION SHOWN IN GRAY DESCRIPTION: 1) An extension of Barley Drive, Rt. 646, from intersection with railroad trestle to cul-de-sac. LENGTH: (1) 0.23 MILES RIGHT OF WAY: (1) 50 FEET ROADWAY WIDTH: (1) 28 FEET SERVICE: (1) 5 HOMES ROANOKE COUNTY Acceptance of Barley Drive, an extension of ENGINEERING & Barley Drive (SR 6461, platted under the INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT West Salem Forest Subdivision, into the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT1 Secondary Svstem. ~ ,, _. ,. ACTION # A-082796-8.c ITEM NUMBER ~~ MEETING DATE: August 27, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Appropriation to the School Grant Fund COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~` ~;,,,~~~-~~' °~~` ~~ BACKGROUND: This grant award is presented to the Roanoke Area Tech Prep Consortium by the Virginia Community College System, funded by Carl Perkins Vocational Education monies. The $75,000 Tech Prep Expansion and Institutionalization grant will be used for the expenses related to continued activities including staff development, student recruitment, curriculum development, articulation, workplace experience, and classroom and career center materials. FISCAL IMPACT: None STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To seek approval for the Roanoke County School System to serve as fiscal agent for a grant in the amount of $75,000 for a period of one year, July 1, 1996 - June 30, 1997. Garland Kidd Director of Adult and Vocational Education Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) %~'j Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION Motion by: Bob L. Johnson to approve cc: File Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Dr. Deanna Gordon, School Superintendent VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy x Harrison x Johnson ~ Minnix .~. Nickens ~ ,` ~i FROM THE MINUTES OF THE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE COUNTY MEETING IN REGULAR SESSION AT 7 P.M. ON AUGUST 8, 1996 IN THE BOARD ROOM OF THE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA RESOLUTION REQUESTING AN APPROPRIATION BY THE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO THE SCHOOL GRANT FUND FOR A TECH PREP IMPROVEMENT GRANT. WHEREAS, the Roanoke Area Tech Prep Consortium has been awarded a Tech Prep Expansion and Institutionalization Grant in the amount of $75,000 for the period July 1, 1996 through June 30, 1997, and WHEREAS, the funds will be used for the expenses related to continued consortium activities including staff development, student recruitment, curriculum development, articulation, workplace experience, and classroom and career center materials relating to Tech Prep; BE IT RESOLVED, that the Roanoke County School Board, which serves as the fiscal agent for the consortium, requests an appropriation by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors in the amount of $75,000 to the school grant fund for the expenses as defined in the grant award. Approved on the motion of Mr. Stovall and duly seconded, and on the following recorded vote: AYES: Jerry L. Canada, William A. Irvin, III, Marion G. Roark, Michael W. Stovall, Thomas A. Leggette NAYS: None TESTE: ~,l ,t~'i~ Clerk c: Mrs. Diane Hyatt Mrs. Penny Hodge ACTION # ~'-082796-8.d ITEM NUMBER `- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 27, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Request to Appropriate Funds for the Rental of Mobile Units at Cave Spring Junior High COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Roanoke County School Board has received funding to renovate Cave Spring Junior High. The School Board will need to rent and install four mobile units to provide alternate class space during the one year renovation period. FISCAL IMPACT: The 1992 Virginia Public School Authority bond issue has been fully spent. The interest income in excess of the arbitrage rebate is now available for school capital projects. The cost to install and rent four mobile units for one year is $46,000. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that $46,000 of interest income from the 1992 Virginia Public School Authority bond issue be appropriated for the installation and one year rental of four mobile units at Cave Spring Junior High. The School Board approved this action at their meeting on August 8, 1996. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: ~•C,Cyn Diane D. Hyatt Elmer C. Hodge Director of Finance County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: Bob L. Johnson to approve cc: File Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Dr. Deanna Gordon, School Superintendent VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy ~_ Harrison x Johnson x Minnix x Nickens _t~ M:\FINANCE\COMMON\BOARD\8-27-96.SCH A-082796-8.e ACTION NO. ITEM NO. L`~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 27, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Donation of drainage Supervisors of Roanoke the Green Valley Bond the roadside drainage easements to the Board of on Sunnyvale County in Project and COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: connection with improvements to Street This consent agenda item involves acceptance of the following easements conveyed to the Board of Supervisors for drainage purposes: a) Green Valley Bond Project: Donation of a drainage easement, of variable width, from Marian Hickox, (Deed Book 1391, page 1825) (Tax Map No. 77.18-2-66), Cave Spring Magisterial District, as shown on a plat prepared by the Roanoke County Engineering Department, dated July 25, 1994, a copy of which is attached hereto. b) Roadside drainage improvements on Sunnyvale Street: Donation of a drainage easement, fifteen feet (15') in width, from Claire Audrey Tucker, (Deed Book 455, page 482) (Tax Map No. 79.01-3-27), Vinton Magisterial District, as shown on a plat prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C., dated 28 May 1996, a copy of which is attached hereto. The location and dimensions of this property have been reviewed and approved by the County's engineering staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Department of Engineering and Inspections was represented by outside counsel in the preparation, acquisition, and approval of this easement. The engineering staff recommends acceptance of the easement. L--.S Respectfully submitted, Vickie L. Huf an Assistant Coun y Attorney ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson No Yes Abs Denied ( ) ~~prove Eddy x Received ( ) Harrison x Referred ( ) Johnson x To ( ) Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Vickie L. Huffman, Assistant County Attorney Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections ' METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT REPRESENT A r COMPOSITE OF DEEDS, PLATS, AND CALCULATED INFORMATION AND DO NOT REFLECT AN ACCURATE BOUNDARY SURVEY. L-.,5~ TAX MAP No. 77.18-2-65 N34'26' 30"E 15 ~ PROPOSED ~ DRAINAGE EASEMENT C~ Z ~' PROPERTY OF C ° CHESTER C. & MARIA HICKOX (P.8.3, PG.153) r ~ ~ NZ~a~04 0 ~, N44'43'51 "E 6a 8,\ ~~ ~ 82.39' `~\~0 ,, 00 125.00' COLONY LANE TAX MAP N0. ~? • 18= 2= 6 6 v~ , wo TAX MAP No. ~o0 77.18-2-67 SCALE: _ 1 '_ 40' PLAT SHOWING PROPOSED DRAINAGE EASEMENT BEING CONVEYED TO ROANOKE COUNTY BY CHESTER C. & MARIA~HICKOX PREPARED BY.• ROANOKE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: 0725- 9 4 c: ~c~p~PUrs~~nazaa ..~ ~` TAX•~79.01-3-26 PROPERTY OF FRALIN do WALDRON, INC. D.B. 1449, PG. 60 ..~ • . N 54'4'00• W ' ' 224.20 w N`~ a r EX. 10' I ' 3 GRAVEL DRIVE og ~ ~- EX. FENCE POST N 57'42'51' W 304.35'--~ (TIE LINE ONLY EX. FENCE POST TO CORNER /~1) TAX /79.01-3-16 PROPERTY OF ROBERT W FURROW` k BARBARA K. FURROW D.B. 1205, PG. 1654 12 / BLOpK ~ SfCn '~F HAMPTON ON No, i ~0 11 pB.) PCHI((S• 9y 10 y / / 3) o~' ~ 8 7 Q~ o N 3,T~p6 00• W 6 5/ 4 p`rSA / G,' 1 4i 3 a 962.50• 2 I '~d~ 1 3 TAX X79.01-3-27 ~ PROPERTY OF ROBERT LEE TUCKER & po CLAIRE AUDREY TUCKER ~ D.B. 455. PG. 482 ~°j~ CENTERLINE EX. ~ CREEK ~ yo° TAX /79.01-3-28 • • • ^ PROPERTY OF ~ ~ NEW ~Jr' DANTON M. THIERRY ~~~^ DRA/NAIiE EASEMENT TOTA1. ' W.B. 51, PG. 779 834.50 S 75 '26'00" E T L S ~ S 14 x•00• E i8.T.20' YYA E~ ~ $V~ SEC- o OF wAY R1GH 30' PRESCRIP¶~ NOTES: 1. THIS PLAT IS FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF CREATING A 15' DRAINAGE EASElAENT AS SHOWN HEREON AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACTUAL BOUNDARY SURVEY. 2. THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A CURRENT TITLE REPORT AND THERE MAY EXIST ENCUMBRANCES NOT SHOWN HEREON. 3. TOTAL AREA OF NEW IS' DRAINAGE EASEMENT ACROSS TAX 879.01-3-27 = 3,315 S.F. 4. IT IS THE INTENT OF THIS PLAT TO EXTEND THE NEW 15' DRAINAGE EASEMENT TO THE NORTHEAST BOUNDARY OF THE PROPERTY OF ROBERT LEE TUCKER AND CLAIRE AUDREY TUCKER. LEGEND EX. EXISTING - x - FENCE D.B. DEED BOOK P.G. PAGE NEW 15' DRAINAGE EASEMENT S.F. SQUARE FEET NEW i5' DRAINAGE EASEMENT LINE DIRECTION DISTANCE 1-2 S 43'43'45" W 222.46' 2-3 N 46'1S'15" W 15.00' 3-4 N 43'43'45' E 219.50 4-1 ` S 5726'00" E 15.29' PLAT SHOWING NEW 15' . ~ DRAINAGE EASEMENT ~tiTH OF BEING GRANTED TO ~`~ °r THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE ri -Z9-9~ 'P~ BY JR. HENDERSON ROBERT LEE TUCKER & , ij.~"-wQ'~..~-~. ' CLAIRE AUDREY TUCKER No. 1480 ACROSS TAX #79.01-3-27 t9`~ sURV~°4 SCALE: 1" = 200 GATE: 28 MAY 1996 , ' LUMSDEN ASSOCIATES, P. C. ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS-PLANNERS ROANOKE, VIRGINIA . ~~~ ~n~!r,! uoF_ 1 ~o r ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 27, 1996 RESOLUTION 082796-8.f HONORING THE LATE JOAN LYONS FOR OVER FOURTEEN YEARS OF SERVICES TO ROANORE COUNTY WHEREAS, the late Joan Lyons was first employed in November, 1981, as an Eligibility Worker for the Department of Social Services; became a Senior Eligibility Worker in 1984; and was promoted to Eligibility Supervisor in 1989; and WHEREAS, Ms. Lyons supervised the Medicaid Eligibility Program and was instrumental in improving efficiency in Medicaid application processing and preparing the staff for implementation of ADAPT; and WHEREAS, Ms. Lyons was a dependable, loyal and optimistic individual who displayed care and compassion for citizens as well as her staff and fellow employees; and WHEREAS, Ms. Lyons, who retired on disability from Roanoke County on July 1, 1996, and passed away on August 7, 1996, will be greatly missed by the employees and citizens of Roanoke County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County wishes to honor her memory and expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to the late JOAN LYONS for over fourteen years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke County. FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its deepest sympathy upon the death of Ms. Lyons to her family. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the resolution, 1 r and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Ho ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Resolutions of Appreciation File Joseph Sgroi, Director, Human Resources Dr. Betty McCrary, Director, Social Services 2 ACTION NO. / /- ITEM NUMBER `"_Y AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 27, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution honoring the late Joan Lyons, Social Service Department, for over fourteen years of services to Roanoke County COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: On July 1, 1996, Ms. Joan Lyons, Eligibility Supervisor, Social Services Department, retired on disability from Roanoke County with over fourteen years of service. She requested that the resolution of appreciation upon her retirement be mailed to her. The Clerk's Office was in the process of preparing the resolution when Ms. Lyons passed away on August 7, 1996. Her husband has requested that Ms. Lyons' resolution be mailed to him upon approval. It is recommended that the Board approve the resolution honoring Ms. Lyons for her services to Roanoke County and mail it with their sympathy to Mr. Lyons. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, ~'i Brenda J. Holton Elmer C. Hodge Deputy Clerk County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- L-G Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Harrison Johnson Minnix Nickens Motion by: ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 27, 1996 RESOLUTION HONORING THE LATE JOAN LYONS FOR OVER FOURTEEN YEARS OF SERVICES TO ROANORE COUNTY WHEREAS, the late Joan Lyons was first employed in November, 1981, as an Eligibility Worker for the Department of Social Services; became a Senior Eligibility Worker in 1984; and was promoted to Eligibility Supervisor in 1989; and WHEREAS, Ms. Lyons supervised the Medicaid Eligibility Program and was instrumental in improving efficiency in Medicaid application processing and preparing the staff for implementation of ADAPT; and WHEREAS, Ms. Lyons was a dependable, loyal and optimistic individual who displayed care and compassion for citizens as well as her staff and fellow employees; and WHEREAS, Ms. Lyons, who retired on disability from Roanoke County on July 1, 1996, and passed away on August 7, 1996, will be greatly missed by the employees and citizens of Roanoke County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County wishes to honor her memory and expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to the late JOAN LYONS for over fourteen years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke County. L ~~ FIIRTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its deepest sympathy upon the death of Ms. Lyons to her family. ~~ GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA of General Amount Fund Revenues Beginning Balance at July 1, 1996 (unaudited) $7,176,332 7.92% Balance at August 27, 1996 $7,176,332 7.92% Changes below this line are for information and planning purposes only. Balance from above $7,176,332 Reserve for R.R. Donnelly -Phase II (570,000) Potential Liability (1,200,000) $5,406,332 5.97% Note: On December 18, 1990, the Board of Supervisors adopted a goal statement to maintain the General Fund Unappropriated Balance at 6.25% of General Fund Revenues 1996-97 General Fund Revenues $90,565,107 6.25% of General Fund Revenues $5,660,319 Respectfully Submitted, Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance M:\Finance\Common\Board\Gen96. WK4 o-~ CAPITAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Amount Beginning Balance at July 1, 1996 (unaudited) $648,413.00 (Includes final payment from City of Salem which was received in June 1996) Balance at August 27, 1996 $648,413.00 I Respectfully Submitted, ~~~ ~. ~~~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance M:\Finance\Common\Board\Cap96. WK4 a-~ RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Amount From 1996-97 Original Budget $305,313.00 Balance at August 27, 1996 $305,313.00 Respectfully Submitted, Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance M:\Finance\Common\Board\Board96. WK4 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ©" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 27, 1996 AGENDA ITEMS: Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investments and Portfolio Policy, as of July 31, 1996. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: BANKERS ACCEPTANCE: CENTRAL FIDELITY 990,265.00 NATIONS 2,966,349.73 SIGNET 6,538,486.99 WHEAT 1ST 3,677,567.91 14,172,669.63 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSITS: CENTRAL FIDELITY 1,000,000.00 SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA SAVINGS ~ LOAN 100,000.00 1,100,000.00 COMMERICAL PAPER: CENTRAL FIDELITY 994,352.78 CRAIGIE 2,970,991.67 CRESTAR 3,970,843.06 SCOTT & STINGFELLOW 995,583.33 SIGNET 993,669.44 WHEAT 1ST 1,967,704.16 11,893,144.44 FEDERAL CREDIT: PAINE-WEBBER 1984227.22 PRUDENTIAL 986,500.56 2,970,727.78 LOCAL GOVT INVESTMENT POOL: GENERAL FUND 10,177,742.06 RESOURCE AUTHORITY 1,545,341.84 11,723,083.90 REPURCHASE AGREEMENT: CENTRAL FIDELITY 1,000,000.00 FIRST VIRGINIA 3,333,000.00 4,333,000.00 INVESTMENT: COMMONWEALTH 1002103.42 COMMONWEALTH (RES. AUTH.) 4,948,154.82 5,950,258.24 TOTAL 52,142,883.99 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: tted Respectfu l y S u bm i Approved J ~ ~ ~ - ~ e C. Anderson Elmer C. Hodge County Treasurer County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved ()Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied () Eddy Received () Johnson Referred () Kohnike To () Minna Nickens ITEM NUMBER ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 27, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Police Department Traffic Unit - Annual Report COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Roanoke County Police Department Traffic Enforcement Unit completed the second year of operations on June 30, 1996. The cost to fund this unit, averaged over four years, is $157,736. The agency also established a yearly goal of generated revenue totalling $190,284. The accompanying graph (Graph 1) illustrates the above summary. Table 1 reports the projected traffic activity compared to the actual number of summonses issued. This past fiscal year, the Traffic Enforcement Unit generated $210,854 in revenue. This figur The generated revenue figures additional personal property Treasurer's Office as a result o Attachments SUBMITTED BY: /~~ H. Cease Chief of Police ACTION Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Motion by: APPROVED: ~,~~~ Elmer C. Hodge, r. County Administrator e exceeded Unit costs by $53,118. outlined above do not include tax revenue received by the f County decal enforcement. VOTE Eddy Harrison Johnson Minnix Nickens No Yes Abs a ~I \/ I .y - ,,3 '" ~s~.. O ~` ~~`~ ~ i } W O i ~ U xt, . ~~ - I ~ 4+ ~ W N Z O ~ ~ ~ i ~{ .~ i ° ~ ~ .~~ x 'k _ - W ~~~ a L ° I ~ °z z J ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ Y.i ~ (/~ Q H F- a~ z ~ ~ h' ° ~ ^~ O ~ ~ '~ ~~ o ~ ~~ ~ o, ' 'gym w .w'. ~ X43 n~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,L~i G4 (V } ~~Mt ~ *.~ ~~ f ~ ~ ay?, :. .t ~~ jni*>f i '.. J F, , ~r.r ~' 'r Q O ~~h ,. ~ I }' ;r, I I i ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ 3 j °~~, LL W [ t ~.(~, a Orr u'r~ ~ l W Q r `. s i '~ i~ e s ~.~ n Z~ $,rv~:y ~~ r. „,_ U ~ ~f~ a I N z LL O ~ > Z W Y J -- - ~~ ~~ ,, -------- ~ ~ ~~~ d ~ ~ : '~ ~ ~. _ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 °o °o o° °o °o °n °o on °o on N N Q5 ~~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ O M N a0 N ~j • • O ~ M 7 CO ~O O v1 ~ N ~ ~ vNi N ~ N M • O O ~ ~ (D N V ~ ~ ~ N ~ M~ N~ O ~ O N r N t17. ~ O O O ~ M ~ ~ ~ N M O ~ to r O I~ N ^ M ~ MMf~~tly .-O v ~~ O N N ~ M~ O~ N O M r N M M ~ .- c0 e- O op ~ O ~ ~ .--~ N CO ~ ~ O ~ M O a O ^ . r ~ V M O ~~ ~- O ~ n N ~ M • ^ N M N~ 0 N~ n O ~ r M f~ ap ~ 1~ ~ W O O r M 00 n M M N O 0 0 ~ ~ • N • ~ W ~ I- J -~ C7 Q U U 1 p p ' J 0 ~ w f., Z a p O U d J °z''a~W°w ~ w ~ N ~ ~ = Z pcngtnUUO ~ p_s i• ACTION # ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 27, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Accounts Paid -July 1996 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Payments to Vendors: $7,542,976.00 Payroll: 7/12/96 $643,380.10 7/26/96 640,347.63 1,283,727.73 $8,826,703.73 A detailed listing of the payments is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. SUBMITTED Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance BY: APPROVED ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Approved () Motion by No Yes Abs Denied () Eddy Received () Johnson Referred O Harrison To () Minnix Nickens 9 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 27, 1996 RESOLUTION 082796-9 CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the Certification Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Ho ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Executive Session ~ r AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, AUGUST 27, 1996 ORDINANCE 082796-10 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 5.0-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT THE TERMINUS OF BURLINGTON DRIVE ADJACENT TO FRIENDSHIP MANOR (TAX MAP NO. 27.13-5-5) IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-3 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-1 WITH A CONDITION UPON THE APPLICATION OF INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ROANORE COUNTY (TRENT DEVELOPMENT) WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on April 23, 1996, and the second reading and public hearing was continued on May 28, 1996, on June 25, 1996, on July 23, 1996, and the second reading and public hearing was held on August 27, 1996; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on May 7, 1996; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 5.0 acres, as described herein, and located at the terminus of Burlington Drive adjacent to Friendship Manor, Tax Map Number 27.13-5-5) in the Hollins Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-3, Medium Density Multi-Family Residential District, to the zoning classification of C-1, Office District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County (Trent 1 Development). 3. That the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing the following condition which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts: (1) If Burlington Road is used for access to the subject property, then Burlington Road shall be improved to standards as specified by the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) and the Roanoke County Department of Engineering. All improvements shall be completed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the first phase of any development on the site. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: All that certain lot, piece or parcel of land, located in the County of Roanoke, Virginia, containing 5.0 acres according to plat of survey dated October 31, 1980, by Raymond C. Weeks, and according to which said property is more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a concrete monument at the southwesterly corner of Lot 20 as shown on the map of R. E. Dillard Farm, made by C. B. Malcolm, SCE, dated June 18, 1937, of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Plat Book 2, Page 106; thence N. 26 deg. 02' W. 352.94 feet to an iron pin; thence N. 63 deg. 58' E. 700.0 feet to an iron pin; thence S. 26 deg. 02' E. 271.54 feet to an iron pin; thence S. 57 deg. 52' W. 234.66 feet to an iron pin; thence S. 57 deg. 04' W. 470.08 feet to the Place of Beginning, and being the southerly portion of Lots 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, and 20, according to the above described map of the R. E. Dillard Farm. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in 2 zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Hol on, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 3 I C 7 5~ \ ~ MpJ • 7i .~ i~ ~ ~-~ ~ ~ ~ o~. ~ . ?~' ~. oy,,~. ~ 35 \ ~ ~ ~d~ OHIILS~r ,~ ~ I SOS. NOFfH ~~. _ ~8\\\\\ 0 ~° l l a 1 s IPF^''ntir Ma s}F ~ ~.r~ji NGRc !`n t, `I ~\~ R iNGiC I t,l/~F~rEw ~~ Q `~ao Site name: ~.M F ~x Peters Creek Corridor I QQ}( 9_(T ~ c^rV(~115- X~~~i1~/I'ren~t _ -~°-~°~ //• e • 2 f ' ~ \ tt-•, /t~ t~ b ; 18 Y ~ ~iJ19 t\\\ ' \\\O ° „ 2b ~ 24 ' `\ 19 / \ ~• 23 \ ~ ,~ ' ~ 21 t~1 ,'~ 'tt~ \ , \ '' / \ '_5• r 4 \ \ /~ ,. \2T ~ . . ..... ` ~~~' ~ r 8 ]] ' ~ Oai NH 49 2s .P. \• ,• \ ~ ki ~ it . U 0.9 `t ~]4 `~ • `• +• : °f'r •' S / ~ h ° ,'• 24 ~~ , \ ]6 ~t~l p b\bt . ~ ~~ ~ ~, ~. ~ ..\ .;, \~ \ ~ \ a \ 1 `~~ I/ •~a \ ~ _~ ~ ~ r ~Ot 26 c ~ \ 3]\ ..\ ti,y ti ~ car. 9 S - 2!2 ° I~of . \ \ ~• 73 \ ti / 7 .o S ~ ~. ~+\ ~j l \ \ \ \ / ~~, . it ~b' 4~• / \ \ \ • • \\ \ \\ \ \\ ~ \ b • y 3 a ' \ \ \ \ \ 2 a~a< \Y \ \ \ \ \ { .( \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ~ ~ \ \ \ \ \ \ ~ \ \ ~ \ \ \ ~ \ \ \ \\ 4 \ \ \ \ \ / .I~ y Lts ac \ \ \ \ \ ~ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ y • \ \\ \ \ \ ~ \ \ \ I•• 100' \ \ \ - c \ \ \ ~\ \ ~~ 1 \ \ \ O" \ ~°° \ \ \ \ Tax Map Numbers: Request: I D A /TRENT D E V E L O P M E N 27.13-5-5 ~ ~ - Rc~C~x~Cx3X~c~X1X X X X X X X~C.~~ X-- ~--- -- x~jX~x~C ~ Rezone R-3 to C-1 5.00 IN RE: INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ROANOKE COUNTY PROFFERS The undersigned, Applicant and Property Owner, hereby voluntarily proffer the following condition relative to the rezoning of the subject property from R-3 to C-l. 1. If Burlington Road is used for access to the subject property, then Burlington Road shall be improved to standards as specified by the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) and the Roanoke County Department of Engineering. All improvements shall be completed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the first phase of any development on the site. ~ ~~ H. F. " al" rent, S . r~ C2 . Bill Bra ch, Chairman, Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County ~, ~ r t,. ^f } ~ ~fy• /~ August 6, 1996 ypLUMEER56LUE R~'E ~T °F ~ ~ 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO . ~ "'~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 27, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: Petition of Industrial Development Authority (Trent Development) to rezone 5.0 acres from R-3 to C-1 to allow commercial uses, located at the terminus of Burlington Drive adjacent to Friendship Manor, Hollins Magisterial District. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Recommend approval. I have discussed this with Mr. Harrington and Mr. Gubala. Both assure me that they are in agreement. Mr. Harrington has also discussed with the members of the Planning Commission and they are supportive as well. This request was continued from your July 23, 1996 meeting to allow the property owner and applicant to consider submitting a revised proffer that addressed improvements to Burlington Drive. The property owner has subsequently submitted a revised proffer that guarantees that Burlington will be improved if future development on this property connects to this road. The new proffer is included in your packet along with the original staff report and Commission transmittal report. The staff believes that the submittal of this revised proffer addresses the primary concerns of the Planning Commission. Staff recommends as follows: 1. That the Board of Supervisors accept this revised proffer that addresses the improvement of Burlington Drive, and thereafter take action on this rezoning request. ~= ~ 2 Respectfully Submitted, ., ./' Terr nce L. Harring , AICP Director of Planning and Zoning Approved, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Vote No Yes Abs Eddy Harrison Johnson Minnix Nickens .~ • ~ PETITIONER: INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (TRENT DEVELOPMENT) CASE NUMBER: 75-5/96 Planning Commission Hearing Date: May 7, 1996 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: May 28, 1996 ~~ l A. REQUEST Petition of Industrial Development-Authority (Trent Development) to rezone 5.0 acres from R-3 to C-1 to allow commercial uses, located at the terminus of Burlington Drive adjacent to Friendship Manor, Hollins Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Commission inquired about using Peters Creek Road as an access and road improvements. Mr. Harrington commented as follows: if Burlington Drive is not used, the applicant would need to obtain an easement from the adjoining property owner to access Peters Creek Road and Roanoke County will require curb and gutter if a new access road is constructed. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS 1) If the five acre tract is developed in conjunction with adjoining commercial property which has access onto Peters Creek Road (using the Alpine Road curb cut), no improvements will be required to Burlington Drive and Burlington Drive could be used as a secondary access. 2) If property is developed without access to Peters Creek Road, then improvements to Burlington Drive shall be required as specified by VDOT and the Roanoke County Department of Engineering and shall be designed to be completed prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the first phase of any commercial development on the site. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Witt moved to recommend approval of the petition with the proffered condition. The motion failed to carry with the following roll call vote: AYES: Witt NAYS: Hooker, Robinson, Thomason ABSENT: Ross Mr. Witt pointed out that a lot of multifamily residential land is being lost to commercial/industrial development and consideration needs to be given to retaining some R-3 land for apartments. Mr. Thomason concurred. F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE Ms. Hooker expressed concern with using Burlington Drive even as a secondary access for commercial use. She said she could not support the motion. Mr. Robinson reluctantly agreed with Ms. Hooker and said that any improvements made to Burlington Drive could offset any impact on the existing residences. G. ATTACHMENTS: Concept Plan Vicinity Map - Staff Report _ Other Terrance~arringto ecreta Roanoke County Planning Commission /„-f IN RE: INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ROANOKE COUNTY PROFFERS The undersigned, Applicant and Property Owner, hereby voluntarily proffer the following condition relative to the rezoning of the subject property from R-3 to C-l. 1. If Burlington Road is used for access to the subject property, then Burlington Road shall be improved to standards as specified by the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) and the Roanoke County Department of Engineering. All improvements shall be completed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the first phase of any development on the site. ~ -~ ,~ ~ .; • H. F. " al" rent, °~ t ~,~ Bill Br ch, Chairman, Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County August 6, 1996 / .~ STAFF REPORT PART I PETITION: Trent Development Co. FILE NO.: 15-5/96 PREPARED BY: T. Harrington DATE PREPARED: May 1, 1996 A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This is an R3 to C1 rezoning request submitted by the IDA of Roanoke County on behalf of the property owner, Trent Development. Significant issues associated with this request are the rezoning request's incompatibility with the Comprehensive Plan, and the property's inadequate access as it relates to the design and capacity of Burlington Dr. B. DESCRIPTION 1. This is a rezoning petition of the Industrial Development Authority (IDA) of Roanoke County. The petition, filed on behalf of Trent Development Company, requests that a 5.0 acre parcel of land located at the terminus of Burlington Drive, in the Hollins Magisterial District be rezoned from R3 to C1 to allow the commercial development of the property. No specific use of the property is proposed at this time. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS 1. R3 is amulti-family zoning district that allows a variety of residential use types at a maximum density of 12 dwelling units per acre. C1 is an office commercial district that allows a wide variety of residential, civic, and commercial use types. (See Section 30-53 for complete listing of uses permitted by right and special use.) 2. Site Plan approval will be required prior to the commercial development of this site. A VDOT commercial entrance permit will be required. ,....... s PART II A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS 1. The site is generally characterized by rolling topography. Vegetation on the site is varied, with a mixture of grassland and wooded areas. 2. No dwelling units or other structures are on the property. 3. The surrounding neighborhood is generally characterized by large parcels of vacant land. The property is bordered on three sides by vacant land zoned R3 or C1. A single family house on Burlington, also shares a common property line with this parcel. Current access to the site is limited to the terminus of Burlington Drive. Burlington Drive is a short, sub-standard state secondary route with a pavement width of 14 feet. There is no cul-de-sac or public turnaround area at the end of Burlington. Land uses on Burlington are varied. Several small office-type businesses are located at the intersection of Burlington and Airport. These businesses are zoned C1 The remaining properties on Burlington are developed as several single family homes. These properties are zoned R3. B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Because no specific use for the property is proposed, a detailed analysis of the development is not possible. Given the location of this property vis-a- vis other large adjacent vacant tracts, it is possible that this property would develop in conjunction with these tracts. Public water and sewer are available to most of the property. However, public sewer may not be available to the southeastern corner of the property due to the terrain of the site. The Fire and Rescue Department has advised that rezoning of this property will not impact the ability of the Department to provide fire and rescue services within established standards. 2 File No.: ^ C. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN T- / This property is designated Development in the Comprehensive Plan. This designation establishes areas of the County where the bulk of new residential development should occur. A variety of housing types and densities are encouraged to locate within Development areas. Office type uses are not encouraged to locate within Development areas, except as part of a larger planned unit development. PART III This property is a 5.0 acre tract targeted by the IDA as suitable for commercial development. No justification has been submitted other than the commercial zoning of this property would allow the property to be marketed in association with the adjacent C1 parcel that fronts on Peters Creek Road. A letter supporting the joint development of this tract has been received by the staff and has been attached to this report. Burlington Drive, due to its inadequate width, and condition is not suitable for levels of traffic associated with a five acre or larger commercial development. In evaluating the suitability of this site for commercial development, the Commission should also consider the site's suitability for residential development, including the types of multifamily development allowed in R3 and R4 districts. Roanoke County does not have a large inventory of vacant R3 and R4 properties. Successive rezoning of multifamily tracts to commercial or industrial designations will result in Roanoke County not being able to provide a suitable inventory of land for this important housing type. Commercial zoning/development of this property should not be considered unless the applicant proffers in writing that either: 1. Burlington Drive shall not be used for vehicle access to the site. or, 2. The developer shall fund and make improvements to Burlington Drive from Airport Road to its terminious at the property. These improvements shall be as specified by VDOT and the Roanoke County Department of Engineering, and shall be designed to be completed prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the first phase of any commercial development on the site. 3 File No.: COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT . OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 6rambletcn Ave. S'.'/ P.O. box 2°800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 Proposed Zoning: See attached sheets ~-r Proposed Land Use: See attached sheets ~ .~ / add: Y-z-~G ~-. rcr sra~ %~ use only ~- / Yip 005 c'a:a: Case Number: '~~"`'/j~~(/' ~~ Staff Use Only Use Type: ' Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parce! meet the minimum criteria for the r=_quest=_d Use Type? YES NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED F[RST. If rezoning request, are conditions being pro~~ere~ v~ith this request? Y~~ NO Variance of Section(s) Of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. AF?LIGATION 1rV1LL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v -f ws v R~s v Consultation ~ ~ 8 1 /2" x 1 1 ' concept plan Application fee Application '~= Metes and bounds description '~ Proffers, if applicable Justification ~~`>` Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners / hereby certify that / am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge d consent of tre oN~ner. '~ _ ~q ~~ Owner's Signature: GcLd ~'~C~ Edward A. Nacc, Counse n uscrial uavelu• mCi ~. << ~1~: of Roanoke County, Virginia ~_/ SITE EVALUATION CRITERIA SITE NAME TAX MAP # MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Trent Development 27.13-5~~~ Hollins SITE LOCATION End of Burlington Drive, adjacent to Friendship Manor Lakeview Property SITE SIZE 5.00 EXISTING LAND USE Vacant EXISTING ZONING R 3 PROPOSED ZONING C 1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION Development WATER SERVICE 8-inch water service through site SEWER SERVICE Existing 10-inch sewer service in area to be upgraded as part of County FY1995-96 CIP ROAD ACCESS Frontage on Burlington Drive ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY COMMENTS 1992-94 Strategy calls for recognition and zoning of office sites as an implementation goal for the finance, insurance, real estate economic sector ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT RATIONALE FOR REZONING Adjustment of zoning district lines to create large marketable commercial office site in Peters Creek Road comdor (in conjunction with ~r ~ Douthat). PLANNING COMMITTEE/IDA SUBCOMMITTEE COMMENTS RECOMMENDATION 4 - ~,~ . / `, 1• 'S• \•' 1 ~i \27 ., ~~'`. 29 ~ f U 9 •~~~~ ~~ \ ~ ..~ :•~ ~ ~~~t ~, ~ ~~ ~ ~k S •'~ ~ + (,t ~ . • 2.9.1 ~~ ``. t Ali 15 ~ ~ A 2t ~)~S s O C« ~ ZY 26 s ~• ~~ ~z ./ / ~ ~T A`O~-', ' ~ O eft ~' , •, ' ,,~ SOS 'j e /„ ~ ~ 59~ • ~ • ~ \ \\ 34 .~k \ s2 ~. .~ req. ' t../~ 3 \ \ \ ...~ , s . ~ ` \\ \\ \\ \\ \ ,\ 2 ~ s` / \ \\ )a~.a \ \ \ 5 \ 7\ T e~e° I \ \ \ \ \ G~ ~ ~ . \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ `\ \ \ \ \ \ \ 4 \ \ \ '\ \ P .1• ~ ~~ \ \ \ 7m~a \ \ \ \ \ •I C I.ce~c \\ \~ \\ \\ \\ \ \'~ \ \ \ \ \ \ ~' \ \ \ \ ~ \ \ \ \ \ P/O 2T.IT -~ -13 \ \ \ \ i' • 100' \ \ \ \ \ \ • \ ~ \ ~\ \ ~e' ~ \ \ \ o`• \ \ \ e J``~„o`0~ \ \ ~ \ -- , - - - - Tax Map Numbers: Request: I D A /TRENT D E V E L O P M E N 27.13-5-5 - Rc~~xRcx3x~c~x1X X X X X X xgc ~~ x--------- -- x~jX~xgx~C ~ Rezone R-3 to C-1 5.00 ~,; ~- . ~ `~ 19~ • ~ f e ~ ,' ~` ~ 20 ~ `' /r• •``' J ••~ ~ /•' ~• ~~ • ~1 2 1 a- ?,- \ 26 ~ ~ 2, ` \ ,may . , \ • ~ `~ / ~ / ` `~ r~! •9 ~` ,~`~ 1 ,. 8 y4 :icy ~\4*` ` + / ~R°°°I °`~. `t~~ 2~O+c ~_~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, AUGUST 27, 1996 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 5.0-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT THE TERMINUS OF BURLINGTON DRIVE ADJACENT TO FRIENDSHIP MANOR (TAX MAP NO. 27.13-5-5) IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-3 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-1 WITH A CONDITION UPON THE APPLICATION OF INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ROANORE COUNTY (TRENT DEVELOPMENT) WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on April 23, 1996, and the second reading and public hearing was continued on May 28, 1996, on June 25, 1996, on July 23, 1996, and the second reading and public hearing was held on August 27, 1996; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on May 7, 1996; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 5.0 acres, as described herein, and located at the terminus of Burlington Drive adjacent to Friendship Manor, Tax Map Number 27.13-5-5) in the Hollins Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-3, Medium Density Mutli-Family Residential District, to the zoning classification of C-1, Office District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County (Trent 1 Development). 3. That the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing the following condition which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts: (1) If Burlington Road is used for access to the subject property, then Burlington Road shall be improved to standards as specified by the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) and the Roanoke County Department of Engineering. All improvements shall be completed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the first phase of any development on the site. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: All that certain lot, piece or parcel of land, located in the County of Roanoke, Virginia, containing 5.0 acres according to plat of survey dated October 31, 1980, by Raymond C. Weeks, and according to which said property is more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a concrete monument at the southwesterly corner of Lot 20 as shown on the map of R. E. Dillard Farm, made by C. B. Malcolm, SCE, dated June 18, 1937, of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Plat Book 2, Page 106; thence N. 26 deg. 02' W. 352.94 feet to an iron pin; thence N. 63 deg. 58' E. 700.0 feet to an iron pin; thence S. 26 deg. 02' E. 271.54 feet to an iron pin; thence S. 57 deg. 52' W. 234.66 feet to an iron pin; thence S. 57 deg. 04' W. 470.08 feet to the Place of Beginning, and being the southerly portion of Lots 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, and 20, according to the above described map of the R. E. Dillard Farm. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in 2 zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. zoning.trent ACTION NO. ITEM NO. " AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: August 27, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE DECLARING A PARCEL OF REAL ESTATE TO BE SURPLUS AND AN ACCEPTING AN OFFER FOR THE SALE OF SAME; NAMELY THE CRE3TWOOD PARR WELL LOT, TAX MAP NO. 76.16-2-13 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY• This is the second reading of well lot known as the Crestwood Park 13, in receipt of offers for same. an ordinance to sell a surplus well lot, Tax Map No. 76.16-2- Advertisements seeking bids for this well lot were published in the newspaper on April 9, 1995 and July 14, 1996. Notices were mailed to all adjoining property owners. The first reading of this ordinance was held on July 9, 1996 and the second reading and public hearing was held on July 23, 1996. At the second reading the County Attorney requested that the Board defer action until issues with respect to the availability of public utilities could be resolved. The Utility Department has corresponded with the apparent high bidder in an attempt to resolve these utility availability issues. The independent appraisal determined that the fair market value of this surplus well lot is $16,500. This appraisal was based upon the assumption that public water and sewer were available to this lot. Public sewer is not immediately adjacent to the property line of this lot. Either a private sewer easement must be obtained , or a service lateral extension of 90 feet to a public manhole in the highway right-of-way will be required. This sewer extension has been estimated to cost approximately $7,000. When advised of these circumstances, the independent appraiser suggested that, if a private easement were required, a "negotiated decrease in the 1 f estimated property value would probably be a reasonable solution." Two bids had been received. Mr. William E. Hill has bid $16,500 less $7,000 (net $9,500) for this lot. Mr. Richard Martin had bid $7,000 for this lot. This office advised all bidders that the Board would only accept an "as is" bid in the amount of at least $16,500; however, subsequent information concerning the availability costs of public sewer may allow for an adjustment in an acceptable bid. The proceeds from the sale of this real estate will be deposited into the water fund in accordance with the trust documents of the 1991 water revenue bonds. ALTERNATIVES' The Board has two alternatives with respect to the second reading of this ordinance: 1) Accept the bid of William E. Hill in the amount of $9,500 for this surplus well lot, and place it back into productive, taxable use; or, 2) Reject all bids, and continue to hold this property as public property. It is recommended that the Board accept the bid of William E. Hill in the amount of $9,500 for this surplus well lot, and adopt this ordinance at second reading (by filling in the appropriate blanks in paragraph 4 of the proposed ordinance). Respectfully submitted, ~~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney 2 ~l-1 Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by agenda.realest.surplus.crestwood.827 Vote No Yes Abs Eddy Harrison Johnson Minnix Nickens 3 ~~ -; v0'j -' 2.05 At ' J/32 - Un,leO Slolas Poslo/ Serncs '' ~ _ _ r ~ ~~ ~_,~ 0 ,~ 7 ° i~~ 3/3l ` ~ i 18 \ ~ N 5 ~ Asa .~, Hoke my L/bary 2.60 Ac ~ ~ 3203 Moin Bront~ O 19 ^ ~ bti 2.52 Ac c. 3207 =`~ v _ zo ~~ O 63 ~ Q~ CEC,P POINT kph o 3~ 6~ 69~ ~ •P~RT MENIS ~ ~ ~p?~ ~~~ -OORESSES 2 20 17 ~ `* aRE Cfi BERR• O ~ X32// 6=6~ 1e o~ 3 a f ~ 32/O ~ 3' S i .,T~ 6 •+ ~ ~ t x'61 ~~ °' 3?/7 °' J ~p° ' 22 21 ~3~ 16 a -. .OJ f,:Pi 70.751 24 - 32/3 "'1 9~ ,1,9 Ts 15 a 3??s ~ od ~e 5 sae `, ROSmO~` 0 r 34 ~ ~ ~~ 3??6 ~ ~ ~6 p ~ o z~~ ~ ~ `~ „ a ' 3227 ~ti o 14 ' 0 3158 9 ~ ~. \ 3212 ~~e o O. 3234 9.~ ~ . 0 33 .35 ~ ~'' ~ >P~~ t i z 30J\32/32 m 0 ^' 0 3226 "~ ~ ~a ;232 13 ' $ 0 r. N wo < ~z ~ ~ eb R.CB.S. '~, 6 ~ 2~ ~ '~~ ~ ~ tib 36 O o 3247 °' o g 29 S~ ~~ ti9 3y39 6 m ~ '~ ~ 3236 ~~ 'u e~ "°STU: a,~ 9sr s ~t $ 12 N '~ t9 ~tS~ e- a sJ~~ 37A5 ~ J3250 `.0 3f q1 .oa Q a ' 5 ' s • 32 ~z~ ~ 'sue, I i ~ ~ ,,~ ~~3 m 28 ~f ~ ~ ~ • !~ 32s6 42 ~ 41 + e ~ ~ s~32s6 '°Ze 369 20, ~ \ ^. a, ~ N 40 ~ 3 ~ a 9r ~ `yV~ O ~ ;r • SO/~i 0 0 f \ <e 9 3260 N 39 ~ ~y~ y / 33aB 10 ' e i~ 3266 ~ ~`p 0 ` 9as~ 6 of 3274 3280 ~fo~~t• 'D R s> fs.38 ~ 1 ~S/~On/ 68.J3 ~ 3724 •7 TB f! bAfD ~~ <~ g' 29 l`~ ~ °< ~~s ~ Road ~~ ~' ~ ' ~; ,~" .; ,, ~- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 27, 1996 ORDINANCE 482796-11 DECLARING A PARCEL OF REAL ESTATE TO BE SURPLUS AND ACCEPTING AN OFFER FOR THE SALE OF SAME; NAMELY THE CRESTWOOD PARR WELL LOT, TAX MAP NO. 76.16-2-13 BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property, having been made available for other public uses before permitting disposition by sale, is hereby declared to be surplus. 2. That an advertisement for bids for the sale of surplus real estate was advertised in the Roanoke Times & World News on April 9, 1995 and July 14, 1996. Notice has also been mailed to the adjoining property owners. 3. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading of this ordinance was held on July 9, 1996, and the second reading and public hearing was continued on July 23, 1996; and the second reading and public hearing was held on August 27, 1996, concerning the disposition of the following parcel of real estate identified as follows: Crestwood Park Well Lot Tax Map No. 76.16-2-13 4. That offers for said property having been received, the offer of William E. Hill to purchase this property for the sum of 59,500 is hereby accepted 5. That the purchase price for the property will be paid 1 upon delivery of a deed therefor and all proceeds from the sale of this real estate will be deposited into the water fund in accordance with the trust agreements of the 1991 water revenue bonds. 6. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the sale of said property, all of which will be on form approved by the County Attorney. 7. That this ordinance will be effective on and from the date of its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Eddy to accept the offer of William E. Hill for $9,500 and adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Johnson NAYS: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Ho ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney John Willey, Property Manager John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance ..r II~, G7` AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 27, 1996 ORDINANCE 082796-12 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO SHINING STARS EARLY LEARNING CENTERS INC. TO OPERATE A DAY CARE CENTER AT 5501 FLORIST ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 38.11-1-21), HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Shining Stars Early Learning Centers Inc. has filed a petition to operate a day care center located at 5501 Florist Road (Tax Map No. 38.11-1-21) in the Hollins Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on August 6, 1996; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on July 23, 1996; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on August 27, 1996. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Shining Stars Early Learning Centers Inc. to operate a day care center to be located at 5501 Florist Road (Tax Map No. 38.11-1- 21) in the Hollins Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1-456 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved with the following condition: (1) The outside play area will be fenced, as shown on the r submitted concept plan, with a wooden privacy fence along the two sides, a chain link fence along the back and a chain link fence in front. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance with revised condition, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Ho ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 2 i. ~ -z ~~ j NORTH - ~. s. ' `~ +~'- y ss T~ 9 a J~ O '~o~ p ~~ .I - - ~~ ~ -i // ~' t is R v ~b /~ ~ ~ I7 l `T ~9 w 1 20 ' is ~- r _ ~' r: 2~~ u ~. r ~i ,''t 12n ,.• ,r„ R `~~ rte. wrn~ ~- ,~ 28 ~ ~ 30 +3 / . t • \ Z7 `~ ~' 7 - 31 J \ i • ~ { ' ~J Kt7 \ ~ ~ \! , ` ~or ~ ~~ i t ~ 7 ~~~ ~t~~1-1//JJ G Z ~" ~~2` G2a~~' Q~, - 5 ~' 24 v~ r''r? - ~` \ / I Y l? ` ~1. J '~ y / dJ ~ 22 v ~ 1 v~ `~~~ a 2 w ,~ ,~, C~ ~ ~ \ ~'° ~ 1 \'i" 39 '° - " r r 25 0 ~ i S '~ ~ / 9.82 6e ' ' / \ ~ 20 t~l.• r ~y - \ V M e i ' ~ a~ ~~ ~` `N ~ ~ !I ~~ ic. it a • ~~ 2 9 ` 4 " ~ ` \ I ` w ' ~8 L.i ~ ~ ~ ~{ JsJi ~ R ~J _ e /'(~ ~ .~ t ~ ~ J67J C ~ `r '•.\ • ,~, t!o /7 ~ Sv~.naal~ Or.) \ •. c V 't ' ~ t5 ~ /1 ' 1 g 26 ~ 14 \ 2.66Ac `O ' )3 J ' 9 = ri °o .~ :y o ~ ~A ` \ rr ,. 1 8 ~ ~~ O 27 ~ u ~' ~ ~~ s _ 3 8 s r. - ~ _ w o ~'t DEPARTT~NT OF PL~NNIItG SHINING STARS EARLY LEARNING CENTERS IN x " - AND ZONING SPECIAL USE PERMIT '" 38.11-1-21 .,, - .~. PETITIONER: SHINING STARS EARLY LEARNING CENTERS INC. CASE NUMBER: 21-8/96 Planning Commission Hearing Date: August 6, 1996 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: August 27, 1996 A. REQUEST Petition of Shining Stars Early Learning Centers Inc. for a Special Use Permit to operate a day care center, located at 5501 Florist Road, Hollins Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION In response to the Commission, the applicant commented as follows: the trees that are located on her property will be cut back so as not to block the entrance; the first Friday hours extend to 9 p.m. in order to allow the parents a "night out" each month; signage for the day care will blend with the neighborhood; the property will be fenced as required by Social Services. D. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS The outside play area will be fenced as shown by the hatched area on the concept plan. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Ross moved to recommend approval of carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Robinson, Ross, Witt, Hooker, NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: the request with the condition. The motion Thomason _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report _ Other ~~, Terrance H ingt6n~cretary Roanoke ounty Planning Commission t ~ ~ STAFF REPORT `-~'~ ~' Case Number: 21-8/96 Prepared by: Janet Scheid Date: 8/6/96 Applicant: Shining Stars Early Learning Centers, Inc. PART I B. DESCRIPTION This request is for a Special Use Permit to allow a day care center in a R-1 zoning district. The property is currently the site of the Northview Church of God of Prophecy which is relocating to another facility. This site is on the east side of Florist Road in the Hollins Magisterial District. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS 1. Day Care Center is defined in the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance as "Any facility operated for the purpose of . providing care, protection and guidance to ten (10) or more individuals during only part of a twenty-four hour day. This term includes nursery schools, preschools, day care centers for individuals, and other similar uses but excludes public and private educational facilities or any facility offering care to individuals for a full twenty- four hour period." 2. Day Care Centers are allowed with a Special Use Permit in the R-1 zoning district. 3. Under State law, all day care centers must comply with the Minimum Standards for Day Care Centers established by the Virginia Department of Social Services. 4. All Day Care Centers must maintain a valid license from the Virginia Department of Social Services. 5. A commercial entrance permit will be required by the Virginia Department of Transportation. 6. A sampling manhole will be required. • 1 taL "" ,,, PART II NS A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIO 1. Lot Area - This site is approximately 2 acres. Although the front of the property is relatively steep the remainder of the property is flat. 2. Location - This site is located on the east side of Florist Road at 5501 Florist Road. To the south and east is property zoned R-1 consisting of single family homes. To the north and west (across Floris t Road) is property zoned C-2. The property directly to the north, zoned C-2, is a single family home. 3. Buildings/Structures - This site is currently the location of Northview Church of God of Prophecy. The church has one main floor and a full basement. To the rear of the existing church is a small storage shed. 4. Access - This site has approximately 250 feet of frontage on Florist Road with an existing entrance. B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEDELOPMENT 1. Use - The applicant is proposing to convert the existing church into a day care center to serve up to 110 children. Approximately 50~ of these children would be in the after school program. Limited interior renovations will be required. The proposed hours of operation are from 6:30 am to 6:00 pm with extended free hours to 9:00 pm on the first Fridays of every month. The yard surrounding the existing building will be used for outdoor activities. The applicant proposes to fence this area with a wooden privacy fence with the exception of the rear of the playground which will be fenced with chain link. The existing storage shed will be removed and a new storage shed built outside the playground area. 2. Access to Site - Access to the site will continue to be from the existing entrance off of Florist Road. VDOT has commented that a commercial entrance permit will be required and that -the existing entrance does not comply with current standards due to angle and grade. VDOT also commented that site distance is impaired due to trees overhanging the road. 3. ParkingJCirculation - Parking will be in the existing lot which has 28 regular and 4 handicap spaces. • C_,.C ^ . 4. Traffic Count - Florist Road, between Hershberger and Williamson, has approximately 5,000 vehicle trips per day. Staff estimates that additional traffic generated by the proposed use would be approximately 180-300 vehicle trips per day. 5. Public Services - This site is served by public water and sewer. 6. Signage - All signage shall comply with Section 30-93 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. C. CONFORMANCE WITH COIINTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This site is designated Neighborhood Conservation on the Roanoke County Land Use Map and is consistent with the policies of that designation. The day care center will provide a needed service within a convenient distance to existing neighborhoods. PART III STAFF CONCLIISIONS Staff recommends approval. • PREPARED BY: JANET SCHEID DATE PREPARED: 7/31/96 • ~~ ! ~'. For staff use only • COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 5204 Bernard Or. P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 ( 540 772-2068 FAX (540) 772=2108 • ~-~ ICJ Check type of application fil~ (check all that apply): ~ REZONING LPL! SPECIAL USE VARIANCE Applicant's name: ~.~ Rlk g ~ \aRS ~\y ~etir~~:,~~ Ce.Y.te.~s ~ Snc. Phone: 3~a-o~a Sa.CZ~le, Zi Code: Address: P•O. {'~o•x 14 la3 ~oo-woke ~~t• a~v3~= ~~ a3 oEi ut~v~ C- rc-~c Go n .fie ~•ec.~ Phone:3~~-593 Owner's name: P:QV. T;cam CC0.\~e..tZ ~ ,~~ /~ Address: 55 O 1 F \c R~ s ~' (•t1. N.W - `2 oc~~n0~~~ ~~ Zip Code: ~ O l Location of property: Tax Map Number: tea, ~~ _ -a 1 n `~`~G l ~(o2,~s} ~7. Q-'C•c:s-a~~ I ~' Magisterial District: - ~l 1( ' C l~ `~ ,~ ( ~, C` ~'`~R~~ ~ ~`~ -"" '~ ~ Community Planning Area: ~ ~ l ~,~ S Size of parcel (s): a acres Existing Zoning: Pte- ~ Existing Land Use: c~nu2~L, sq.ft. Proposed Zoning: (Z-~ ............................. For Staff Use On/y Proposed Land Use: ~ C.o~~ ~,v-~~d. Use Type: Does the p cel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? ~ NO IF NO, A VARIANCE 1S REQUIRED FIRST. YES Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES ~ NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being prorered with this request? YES NO ~~• ~%'ari e of Section(s) Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. w v ws v Consultation j5. 8 1 /2" x 1 1" concept plan Application ~~'~~:. Metes and bounds description ~ Justification `%~°U Water and sewer application date received: received by: -2 -~C. application fee: P /~ date: ~t-t C~. F` -6-5i:. placards i~ep d• BOS date: '! - 2-1-`its Case Number: ~~ Rrs v Application fee ";, Proffers, if applicable Adjoining property owners l hereby certify that l am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner. Owner's Signature: -~ • JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE IN USE OF THE PROPERTY: This property is the proposed site for the new child care center, Shining Stars Early Learning Centers, Inc. Currently, the Northview Church of God of Prophecy resides here. They are moving to a new location and wish to sell the property. The effect of changing the use of this property will be minimal. The church uses the building most days of the week. The day care facility would use the building on Monday through Friday with a slight increase in the traffic. The yard surrounding the building is used now for outdoor activities. The day care will have increased outdoor activity with use of fenced in playgrounds. However, the playground is somewhat isolated and enclosed on two sides by large trees and undergrowth and is situated on top of a hill away from the road frontage. This request to grant a Special Use Permit is being made to allow a day care to exist on the property, which is already zoned R-1. This request is consistent with the general purposes of the R-1 Zoning Ordinance in that a day care would provide a community service to the single family residences located in and around the Sun Valley development. There are no other day care centers in the general vicinity to serve the families of Sun Valley. Quality day care is very much in demand and usually a welcome addition to any residential neighborhood. Shining Stars could serve up to 110 children at this location. This will include children from ages of two through twelve, with about 50% of the children being in the after school age group. • WATER & SF'WFR SERVICE REQUEST FORM ~ - GJ ,~, - APPI,IC.~?~7T INFORMATION (Please Type or P_ tint) ' / _ _ t~(c Pte- ~_ S ~RV~~ P 0 ~~~c ~ Y'~~3 5~:~.~`~ St~.rS }~ 4~R~ CO~LEZE MAILING ~ , /O ~ DPLICANT : ~ ~ ~.~ 2S ~L ADDRESS . {~ o~w~ ~ ~~- a~ `t' 3 ~ ~ ~~ PHONE . ~3 ~ ~, - v D a l f ~z~, -c- ~ e~AQ n~j Ow-NER: op ~ ~ ~ `` C~ DRESS : 5 S0 I ~ ~ K ~ . ~ , l~J~ ~cI , , ~ILC~ a ~- ~ia ~ o-Y `/ PHONE : _„~t0~~ S ~3~ ~~G`~~ C~ ~1~ ~~C~~ GENT: P..DDRESS: ahONE. SITE INFORMATION t~EVELOPMENT NAME: tt C L- TION (FURNISH COPY OF MAP) : L.TS ~ 10 1, `a ~Lk.S~ MAP No .. _ ~~ K , ~~ - ~ - a, \ AcxEAGE : ~ zoNED : R - - TOT~.L UNITS : 1 TOTAL LOTS REQUESTED SERVICES: WATER FACILITIES : COUNTY: ~ WELL SE=,sTER FACILITIES : COUNTY: ~ SEPTIC SYSTEM: %S BUILD~TG TO BE SPRINKLED ? ~ FLOW REQUIRED ? C- . P . M. DESCRIPTION OF WORK (Include any Specific Questions): C~.t - - /I -~~-- SI ATURE OF APPLICANT * * APPLICATION MUST BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY BEFORE IT CAN BE PROCESSED. ALL HIGHLIGHTED SECTIONS MUST BE COMPLETED OR TH2S FORM WILL BE RETURNED . _ • ~ ~ ti 'L ~ J Q U • N W z w U ~ Z OZ w~ ~a w cn -~ o~ w ~ cA Q aw O c~ ~~ as z z_ zQ -~ > ~ a; n o L 0 LL, o 0 z {.LJ a m 0 Q J a z c? • `~ • W H Z W U ~ Z OZ wQ ~- w (n J ~ ~ W ~, fn Q aW O to ~ ~ n. a H C~ Z Z_ 2 • zQ ~~ ~ aj u O ~L ~ o 0 'j' 'L! Z Q W ~ G W J Q W m Z ti W J Q U c!~ • !.~ ~- ~~ ~~ O w W ^O^ Li.. ~O I.L a W F- Z W U C~ Z z w J J Q //W v/ f.L Q c~ z _z zQ ~~ ~ aj .~ ~c u~ o ~L 0 O r C w N z w U ~ Z ~ z FW -W zQ _ N J ~ ~ p } w ~ ~ ai v o p Q '~ c o ca aW ~~ O v~ a. 0 ~ ~ C~ z _z • [.rc " ,~, .,s - ,s ~ .,s - ,o~ i• so' s~ i~ o ~ 0 ~~ ~~ ~ ~ PaRK~NG .2 g R EG~,+ LAR S Pig cEs' Lr N~4NDr CAS PROPOSED SITE FOR SHINING STARS EARLY LEARNING CENTERS 5501 Florist Rd., N.W. Roanoke, VA $A ND a ~ X Pt~9Y 3 HouSE ~^ 7R E F ~~ 5~V ~ v~ EQU`~~ QL~~ 7Rtr ~ ~ 5 SCALE 35'=1" 2so~-o° _ l~ NORTH - ~ --- _ _ --~ a. _- ~ -- --, . - . - - ._..-- - '.'I J ` •~~. 7 1 ~~ ~ - \ ~ J ~ • ~ S QtIL . ails ~ ~ \'1 ~ ~ t~i~ I ` ~ o ~ 'Y33 3 J N ~1 ~ ~ ~ 25 J /,• J~ ~Z ~ ~ s J 24 ~ p - 23 - ~ K u • • r 22 ~!~ ~/ ~ ; IS ° ~ ~~~~ ~ L ~ (i i tiC 1 'i`" 39 a , S 1T ~ ~ 2b a l _• ~ -~ ~ - . j9 .v 982 Ac ~ ° 4O !lam n \ i yr 1_ t ~ • rJ ~ (~ s • • u 20 ~ w a ~/\ tI \ V t,' • r r 19 a• ~ 29 \ s i~ i IQiI \ i ~ n ~\ i df ~ ,!~ ~ V ~ ~/r CI 18 Z'S1 ~ SJ~~ /LO IJ.47AC ''r J6JJ ~'O n ''~ _ ~ - C-2 ~, \ > t -. P ~e.~. ` ~ .~ !• • ~ 16 ~ y IS ?. L~ ~ • ~ !s g 26 ~ 14 2.66Ac `O 13 ~ J! • , o •. :~ o L2 ~ ` V t? J \` g 27 \ ~ I ( a t, ~ 1J/,J \ M ~ 10 _ 38 1. ~ ;, - - o ,~ * DEPARTT~~J'I' OF PLA.I~IING SHINING STARS EARLY LEARNING CENTERS I N AND ZONING SPECIAL USE PERMIT .~ .. •~ 38.11-1-21 . Y ~ a AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 27, 1996 ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO SHINING STARS EARLY LEARNING CENTERS INC. TO OPERATE A DAY CARE CENTER AT 5501 FLORIST ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 38.11-1-21), HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Shining Stars Early Learning Centers Inc. has filed a petition to operate a day care center located at 5501 Florist Road (Tax Map No. 38.11-1-21) in the Hollins Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on August 6, 1996; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on July 23, 1996; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on August 27, 1996. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Shining Stars Early Learning Centers Inc. to operate a day care center to be located at 5501 Florist Road (Tax Map No. 38.11-1- 21) in the Hollins Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1-456 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved with the following condition: (1) The outside play area will be fenced as shown by the hatched area on the concept plan entitled "Proposed Site for Shining Stars Early Learning Centers." zoningshinestr AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 27, 1996 ORDINANCE 0$2796-13 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO WISTER SOWDER TO CONSTRUCT A RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY TO BE LOCATED BETWEEN 7425 AND 7502 OLD MILL ROAD (PART OF TAX MAP N0.95.03-3-9.1), WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Wister Sowder has filed a petition to construct a religious assembly to be located between 7425 and 7502 Old Mill Road (Part of Tax Map No. 95.03-3-9.1) in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on August 6, 1996; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on July 23, 1996; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on August 27, 1996. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Wister Sowder to construct a religious assembly to be located between 7425 and 7502 Old Mill Road (Part of Tax Map No. 95.03-3-9.1) in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1-456 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved with the following condition: (1) Construction of the permanent facility shall begin within ten (10) years of the issuance of the Special Use Permit; otherwise, the applicant will have to reapply for a Special Use Permit. On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~~5%~lv Brenda J. olton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 2 L~t.- 3 NORTH _i ~ - WISTER SOWDER T DEPA.RZ~1~i' OF PLANNII~'G ` AND ZONING SPECIAL USE PERMIT ., .. - ~~. ~ pro 95.03-3-9 PETITIONER: WISTER SOWDER CASE NUMBER: 22-8/96 Planning Commission Hearing Date: August 6, 1996 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: August 27, 1996 A. REQUEST Petition of Wister Sowder for a Special Use Permit to construct a religious assembly, located between 7425 and 7502 Old Mill Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Commission inquired about the drainfield and entrance to the site. The applicant's architect responded that it is a large drainfield with 70 to 80 foot lines; she noted that there is no problem getting a permit from the Health Department. Staff stated that entrance to the site will be decided during site plan review . Other comments include: the temporary buildings are approximately 15 years old; location of parking area to remain the same for the permanent building; there are approximately 75 members and the permanent facility will accommodate 250 people. The Commission commented that temporary buildings have a way of becoming permanent structures. Discussion followed regarding the life of the temporary structures and a start up time for construction of a permanent building. D. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS Construction of the permanent facility shall begin within ten (10) years of the issuance of the Special Use Permit; otherwise the applicant will have to reapply for a Special Use Permit. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Thomason moved to recommend approval of the request with the recommended condition. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Robinson, Ross, Witt, Hooker, Thomason NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report Other Terrance Ha ngt n, reta Roanoke ounty P Wing Commission STAFF REPORT PETITIONER: Winter Sowder _ PREPARED BY: David Holladay CASE NUMBER: 22-8/96 DATE: 8/6/96 PART I A. EXECUTIVE SITMMARY :~ ~ :. es1~::~~r~::a:;S ~. Use.:~~'e~z~I::.t~:~~ns~~~~;2~~~tt~~tt,..;~ae~~~e.,~~.~z~ ~;z~z~l:.~esz .e~~:::; ... ~<::> >c~atz~tste~t .~tth:<:::th~::>:Ruz: ~......: e<:::~ use des~gpat~_:;~a~t~~:_o~n~~~. Cqu~ty ...... . ~~:::;:::~5;.;;::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:::::::::::..::::. ~::::::..... ~........................................ a €s~ ?r B. DESCRIPTION The Solid Rock Baptist Church plans to construct a building in the 7400 block of Old Mill Road. The church plans to connect two 24' X 96' prefabricated buildings for a temporary sanctuary until a permanent structure can be built. The temporary structure would be 5,615 square feet, with a 100-seat sanctuary. The permanent structure would be 10,000 square feet, with a 250-seat sanctuary. The site is a 3-acre tract that Winter Sowder plans to subdivide from his property and sell to the church. Sufficient parking for the congregation would be constructed, along with associated landscaping as required. • C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Site plan review is required. Religious Assembly is permitted by special use permit in the AG3 zoning district. Additional use and design standards in the zoning ordinance address screening and buffering where parking areas or recreational areas adjoin residential use types. Use and design standards also specify maximum building coverage 20% and maximum lot coverage 50% of total lot area. A commercial entrance permit is required by VDOT. Well and septic permits are required by the Health Department. PART II A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS j~i~n -The site is located in the 7400 block of Old Mill Road, in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. TopQg~hvTV_egetation -The site slopes up gently to the south. The majority of the site is open `~ meadow, with some trees along the western boundary and along Old Mill Road. - Surroundin ro rties are wooded and/or open agricultural land, ~ ~ r r~ with some residential land uses. Properties to the east and south are zoned AG3. Property to the west is zoned AG3 and AR. Properties to the north, across Old Mill Road, are zoned AR. B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT . ite out/Architecture -The church has received a donation from Ferrum College of two prefabricated structures. The two 24' X 96' structures, previously used as dormitories, would be combined into one structure to house the church. The structure would be generally located in the center of a proposed 3 acre tract. Anew entrance and parking area are shown on the concept plan. The church plans to use the two prefabricated structures as a temporary sanctuary until a permanent structure can be built. Also shown on the concept plan as part of this request is the footprint of the future structure. The proposed future church is 10,000 square feet, with a seating capacity of 250. The parking lot would be expanded to conform with zoning ordinance requirements. ~~ -Anew entrance is proposed from Old Mill Road. VDOT will evaluate the commercial entrance permit application. Traffic Circulation - 1994 traffic counts on Rt. 752, Old Mill Road are as follows: From TQ Vehicles per day (1994) US 221 Berganblick Ln 236 Berganblick Ln Vinyard Rd 98 Vinyard Rd US 221 344 * section of Old Mill Road which includes the site Most of the traffic on Old Mill Road is concentrated near the two intersections with Route 221. As the petitioner stated, most of the current congregation lives within 2-3 miles of the site. Traffic on Old Mill Road may increase somewhat before and after services and other functions. But no significant traffic impacts are anticipated. Fire Rescue/Utilities -Fire and rescue services would continue as presently provided. The site would be served by private well and septic systems. C. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The site lies within the Rural Village land use designation of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. The Rural Village designation encourages rural community centers, such as churches, that serve the needs of rural village residents. -• ~ -~ D. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD The proposed lot to be subdivided meets the requirements of lot area and public road frontage for the AG3 zoning district. The site appears to have ample space to conform with all use and design standards from the zoning ordinance. VDOT approval is pending for the proposed new entrance. PART III The applicant's request for a Special Use Permit to construct a church is consistent with the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. The site appears to have ample space to conform with all applicable use and design standards for religious assembly. No negative impacts are anticipated. • • • ``. ~-~~ '.,. j ~ E .~ 1~ GNU , of ~ 's ~~`~`~ ~ !,. ` .,,~ 9 { , 1, ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~' FUTU2E PARK/N6 (G4 SPACES) F N ~~ ~~n N h w~ y- E3oW~W~jy. a '~ ~ ~~~ 'p^l~ ~ y~~ 3 41(~~ ~ 2r .' ~ R$ i ' /, S ` ! 1 ~ ,: i ~' ////,' ,/-x,11 / /' -, ~ / _~ t \ I .\\ ~,~\ 'mss ~` \/ X244' ```~ ~ ~$ ~c ~`4=0 ~'S ` ~ - - ~ °p s - - , E4i5lL N. 50w.E? - ~7. i ~M~'1509-3' % _~ j - ;~ l38O ^Ti 50~ ~'EV/SED CONCEPT PLA/v FOR 50L ~D POCK BAPT/ST S/TC/ATED ON A R7RT/LJ~V OF TAX MAP No. 95.03 - 3 - 4.1 R {~ ~ ~] ~j AND LOCATED ON THE O[.D 1+J)1 \ ~ ,~/1t+ ' ~, M2L ROAD A~2EA OF ].L~ ANO ASSOCi ATES.~C. ~0,9/VOKE COUNT Y-1/iR~rn~~a e. ~ e1 ~/ULY 31, /99~ SCACE~ f = /Gi7' ~ JOB NQ R96I34 ~PLANNERS~ARCHITECTS~ENGINEERS~SURVEYORS~ 1208 CORPORATE CIRCLE, ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 772-9580 QECI.ECT~nK; TOw~OaciOW ~,,~ "" • • COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING =2~J`: nernard tJr. P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 ( 5': 0` 772-2068 FAX (5401 772-2108 For staff use only date r' y received by• applic tion O PC/6Z,=. date~Jr l J J / / placards issued: ` • . , BOS date: Case Number: ~ , ~J Check type of application filed (check all that apply): D REZONING CrJ SPECIAL USE ^ VARIANCE Applicant's name: jr/~Sy ~~ ~° • Sac~ll~f'2 Address: ~9~9 ~a9~ ~A~~y ~'d Elf ~~vo~ X 6l~ Phone: 77y G~6 y Zip Code: a Owner's name: 1v/ST,F.>r ~,~c/~. ~o~vfJ~"~' ~ Address: ~l~~9 ~f L ~~~~y ~°~ ~'~~ oa' o c !~A o/~ Phone: 7~y GGG7 Zip Code: 07~0/~ Location of property: Tax Map Number: 95.03-3 _9 ~~oRT~o~v~ ~~Tw~H 7Nas ~ 7~'0 ~ O /~ ~~~~ ~~ ~ Magisterial District: GrJi~vO~a2 ~1GG S oa~lo~ l~'4 0l 8' Community Planning Area: ~/9~ Ck•EE,~ Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: ACr ~ ~ 3 acres Existing Land Use: 6 o sq.ft. ~ j~~m G/S c, ,~ Proposed Zoning: ~a .2 Proposed Land Use(~~/~~y~~ s f}5~'Brli6/t~ - C!/t~~ ........................... For Staff Use Only Use Type: .. Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES ~ NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for t..e requested Use Type? YES NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being pro~~er.d with this request? YES NO t~~~:~~ Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v ws v rvs v Consultation 8 1 /2" x i i " concept plan Application fee ~ Application ~- Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable Justification `' Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners / hereby certify that / am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent of contract purchaser and am acting with the know/edge and cpnsegt of the owned Owner's Signature: ~'--~ " For. Staff Use Only: Case Number Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. ~jC~ r~v~~ k~i%/~~ovido ~- ~~.~ /i ~ ~ Cvr~l~Hi~a,Ce ~a<c~5~", ~yu~5a~47~~ ~r// rz~ ~iSc CGrYID'CSfidvl in ~.~b/~ s>t-ccf~ and u~r ~yo ~~~ a ~ Q~~rcl7~~ o~Y, /y c~ ~ ~:r,,,~, /1.b Z~~s~,-~c (oui~/dies br arms u~i// h~~~~;~ or ~rz~¢~U~YI. ~Th~ :-~r,,~f plc/ R~IGN% ~~t ~/~//- ~/r ~ctfc%~;~n~f aF a o'~v~G G'sc ~r~/i,~,~ lii~i f~ ~~iyr~~ c~~~rXr~ih,. , Th ~ o~t,~.t'lo~ n~u ~~it~~/~Z'oz' ~ ~ ~/ac~ ~ a/c~~r'~ or~~ryb/ic u~i/ifi~s. ~/r fcio,~s Qss~-,~G.~~. i~ GI~~a~t~ %7 / ~f,C ~7~- ~ ~YI~ ~ S~C'iG~ G/.SC ~Yh1/T~ / Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. 77it ~r~i/OuG~lsi~e. /~, ~`z~s ~iis ar~~ 4S L~i~/a~c"f, r~e~~scs~.i~ w6~cLr Svc' ~'~ ski ~ ~ ' / Q~i Vi L1 ~~~5~ SvGGi Os' G~u~cGXS, r_ / - OS ~~'/:~~e /~ die ~~lc~ '1z Q`~s. Please describe the impactis) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. /~' 9~a~ed ~ r~~s~ tv%~ a//aLU ~r ~ca.~~ -r4acf G{' /asa~ -~ ~ gcvelc~ ~i7~ a .xcu ~4cc off' re/i' iouS pS'S~6~~~c.1. f} ftssr~rrriy St~'~zr~-t u~i/l b~ ~~ccft..~/ A/~vs~ /~.~ia~iu~~/ <r`x% ~fi.~~Jy a ~:~ssxrsz/Hf ~~rc'i/i~ w.Y/frt Q~a'~~ ~/I f'lL~vi/~fy~/?~' ~ ~ ~arJ~r~ G~!!G?`!C~ Gurl~ ,6'C /~~fC/~J ~Ql2~S~4~i~ ~Q~;~~rr~, Cevc~~zgc°, e~r./1) CI~~a~ir1` ~fl~cr=>5~s i~~i/r~c~,r~ s~o i.~~cf ~~~- ~" /,~~/,i~!~~} V%sG/l//" r~I c! - f~Odl~ ~rticy G~hu/ G~~~ GTrP ~ a /r~rilQ~/~. =11u~C ~Z tai// ~`i~cc 4 s~~~ ix`~f /~ 7~~c ~~~vy ~ ad a~~s- ~i/~Rc, Sep-/rc~s Q!~/ ctius-c~ ~~~~. S~b~s o~~ G~_~•J~/roc/r~_ ~a~ii bCI/ ~l !'JOJ~ ~ L~l"-~tC~O r ~//G/~5'CG/G /S SN~S Gvi%/ ~ G[~Y~~.r~lN 4Tt-7~ ~~ The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. . TvATER & SE'~i~`R S~VI~ R~'QUEST FORM ~ ~~ '~, : ~ ' ~I ' ~~ ~L~PL SGT? T7T ZNF ORMAT~ON _ (P3ease Type or Print) _ - CO2~i.ETE 3~TI,I3~TG ~PL.rcANT : ~/~~~ ~~ ~s~i~ ~s ~~~~ESS : ~ Zoe ~r~~o~~ ci,~~c~ HONE : -~72 - 950 ~~,~_ cam' ~~~~ Ctrr~v~R : ~/S~Z ~', 5~~-' F.DDRES S : ~ 9~ ~br9G~' (/AL1~"~ ~,O ~r j'ONE : /~7 ~ (p(O(o .P~~~~. v~ 2~0~8 c = NT : 5~i~ ~ ~Pai~thvr-" F.~~RE s s 4.. .ONE . SITE ~TF ORMATSON ~F'v~LOPMENT NAME : ~~,~ ~~ /c~7,~7 ~- TION (FURNISH COPY OF MAP) : ~~~ ~1i// ~~ MAP No.. 95,E 3- 3- 9~ A GREACE : 3 D ZONED : ~ - TOL3~ UNITS : TOTAL ~ LOTS REQUESTED SERVICES WAT~Z FACILITIES : COUNTY: TALL SF".r~ FAC2LITIES : COUNTY: SEPTIC SYS2'~~2: IS BUILDING TO BE SPRZ~TKLED? /VD -FLOW REQUIRN D? C-.P.M. ~;_SCRIPTION OF WORK~(Include any SDECiiic Questions): T~7~1/~02/~72~ ,2~ ~ ~p~2 ~LIG /cU~ iS~F~~F3C ~ , UG T7flirff~Z f~ f9 ~3~i ~CG.Jr - A OF APPLICA.TTT • * * APPLICATION MUST BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY BEFORE IT C.AI~T BE PROCESSED. ALL HIGHLIGH2'ED SECTIONS MUST BE COI~LpLETED OR THIS _ FORM WILL BE RETURNED . _ _ I. '~ r1 ~ r ~ • ~. lMC3b. .~ ~ ~Cw u0u.r~~IM ~ \ o~ M.~+ O o ~ JO,Y' / 'no0 ~~o ~y ~b~• o I x,N pi ` }•75f eoe ~ Ca a. Qp~ > W ~~nE: I r ~ M\1~0. ~ / ~ \\ -- .~ OL0 752 ~ . ~ W w•"'~ r ~~ \• = ROANOKE COUNTY ~ ,E/ `~ 7+00. ~, ~~ ~~ Ata V(C1N(TY MAP ;= u-.~ NORTH 2pOK/D1 1.001e \ ~ ~ ' MI 225k K7 0`\ 24 - - . pNac I.a2lc ~ L2 ~_ .~ ~.t ~ ,s ~• ~ ttas{•~ n j2. to+.e 21 ~ a _ ~ n 1 ~ 2 Lt t .. )!e! ~ \ 2.004 ].{)!e 4D0+. .r ~H ~ i 4 .. ~ .~./ • ~ ~. "' ~ 1 +~~ ~ ~ M752 ~ 2 / J / s.3 ! / 2Mls ' j I.W+ • _ w ! _ H vim. ! NSM nw S . • :. t •. na ) - '- ~ - ~ .n. , %.a ~ t ~ 12 N{ nllr ~~ .i 4 4 n s t ~o.e tail ~. ~ 1 . 11]{ Fc a I t s ~ G-3 ,2r. ~. ~a l ~ / \ l j' Saner a 1 I1f ' ~! l ~- 3 _ • Blue Ridgt: Pukwcy ~ \ ~ ' _ ~t ~ LL~!'`iL it"1.G1V1 Vl r1yG`1V1V 11VV PND 7.ONING .; .,, WISTER SOWDER SPECIAL USE PERMIT p/o 95.03_3_9 C.~ - AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 27, 1996 ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO WISTER SOWDER TO CONSTRUCT A RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY TO BE LOCATED BETWEEN 7425 AND 7502 OLD MILL ROAD (PART OF TAX MAP N0.95.03-3-9.1), WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTE- RIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, blister Sowder has filed a petition to construct a religious assembly to be located between 7425 and 7502 Old Mill Road (Part of Tax Map No. 95.03-3-9.1) in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on August 6, 1996; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on July 23, 1996; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on August 27, 1996. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to blister Sowder to construct a religious assembly to be located between 7425 and 7502 Old Mill Road (Part of Tax Map No. 95.03-3-9.1) in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1-456 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved with the following condition: (1) Construction of the permanent facility shall begin within ten (10) years of the issuance of the Special Use Permit; otherwise, the applicant will have to reapply for a Special Use Permit. zoning.sovder Lam- ~` AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, AUGUST 27, 1996 ORDINANCE 082796-14 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF APPROXIMATELY 5.5 ACRES OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 0.1 MILE NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF ROUTE 460 AND DAUGHERTY ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 55.09-1-20.1, 55.09-1-20.2 AND PART OF 55.13-1-2) IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF I-1 AND C-1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2, WITH CONDITIONS, AND GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT ASSISTED LIVING AND ELDERLY HOUSING FACILITIES, UPON THE APPLICATION OF RICHFIELD RETIREMENT COMMUNITY WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on July 23, 1996, and the second reading and public hearing were held August 27, 1996; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on August 6, 1996; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing approximately 5.5 acres, as described herein, and located approximately 0.1 mile north of the intersection of Route 460 and Daugherty Road (Tax Map Number 55.09-1-20.1, 55.09-1-20.2 and part of 55.13-1-2) in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of I-1 and C-1, Industrial District and Office District, to the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District. 1 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Richfield Retirement Community. 3. That the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing the following condition which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts: (1) Development of the property shall be in substantial conformity with the submitted schematic site plan prepared by Martin and Associates dated June 26, 1996. 4. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Richfield Retirement Community to construct assisted living and elderly housing facilities located approximately 0.1 mile north of the intersection of Route 460 and Daugherty Road in the Catawba Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1-456 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved; and 5. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: "New Lot B" as shown on Resubdivision for County of Roanoke, prepared by T. P. Parker dated July 11, 1996. 6. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Harrison to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: 2 AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. H ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 3 ~* - y C NORTN a _ e, - ,., i ua.. 1• .b w. ~ H -, .-. , ~ / ~ ~ ~ `\ 1] 1 ~.~ ~ ~; 71 1t \• { ~ "'!!H" w is`t, ~ ) Of r • i 2 j9p2 16 ~~' - 1 /~ .~ / ~ J9~j /~ ~ ~ 6.`UAc _ 7 5 ~ ~\~ 6 \r ~~ fi i ~\ h6O 39/1 \ ~~ ~~ ~~n \'s • RICHFIELD RETIREMENT COMMUNITY _ ~'= DEPARTi~~J'I' OF PLA.NNII\'G I-1, C-1 TO C-2 & SPECIAL USE PERMIT prrD ZONh,-G 55.09-~~-20.. ~ ; 20.2 ~ plo 55.13-1-2 .~ .,, `'"~ -` PETITIONER: RICHFIELD RETIREMENT COMMUNITY CASE NUMBER: 23-8/96 Planning Commission Hearing Date: August 6, 1996 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: August 27, 1996 A. REQUEST Petition of Richfield Retirement Community to rezone approximately 5.5 acres from I-1 and C-1 to C-2 and obtain a Special Use Permit to construct assisted living and elderly housing facilities, located approximately 0.1 mile north of the intersection of Route 460 and Daugherty Road, Catawba Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Commission asked if another C-2 use could be utilized at the site. Staff replied that it could. D. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS Development of the property shall be in substantial conformity with the submitted concept plan. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Ms. Hooker moved to recommend approval of the rezoning. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Robinson, Ross, Witt, Hooker, Thomason NAYS: None ABSENT: None Ms. Hooker moved to recommend approval of the Special Use Permit with the recommended condition. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Robinson, Ross, Witt, Hooker, Thomason NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report _ Other ~° Terrance H ngton, Se tary Roanoke ounty Pla mg Commission ' STAFF~REPORT L.~ - Lf • PETITIONER: RICHFIELD RETIREMENT COMMUNITY CASE NUMBER: 23-8/96 PREPARED BY: TIM BEARD DATE: AUGUST 6, 1996 PART I A. Executive Summary This is an unconditional request to rezone approximately 5.5 acres from 1-1 industrial and C-1 office commercial to C-2 general commercial and obtain a Special Use Permit to construct a maximum of two new buildings; one a dementia specific (Alzheimer's assisted living facility supplementing and augmenting existing Richfield Retirement Community facilities increasing the level and scope of services. A wide range of adult care and housing facilities in addition to institutional, industrial, civic, public, and undeveloped properties comprise the general area. The site is designated Core by the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. The proposal is consistent with he Core designation. Although not federally designated, the site drains sufficient upstream acreage to fall under County flood study requirements. B. Description Petition of Richfield Retirement Community to rezone approximately 5.5 acres from I-1 and . C-1 to C-2 and obtain a Special Use Permit to construct assisted living and elderly housing facilities, located approximately 0.1 mile north of the intersection of Route 460 and Daugherty Road, Catawba Magisterial District. The subject property referred to in this petition will not initially be developed but needs the C-2 zoning designation and a Special Use Permit in order to provide access to Daugherty Road and for future expansion of the proposed assisted living facility. C. Application Regulations The C-2 district permit homes for adults, life care facilities, and nursing homes by Special Use Permit. "Assisted Living and Elderly Housing" is not specifically mentioned but may be considered a similar civic use type. No particular use and design standards apply. However, a Special Use Permit is required in order to ensure compatibility with existing and future uses in the area (conformance with the comprehensive plan) and to ensure that the proposal will have a minimum adverse impact on the surrounding neighborhood. The complete range of ordinance regulations involving building setbacks and height, building and lot coverage, signage, exterior lighting, screening and buffering, and parking will be applied. A commercial entrance permit will be required by VDOT. Site development plans will be reviewed and approved by County staff before a building permit is issued. • ~-y z • PART II A. Analysis of Existing Conditions Location: The subject site is adjacent to and immediately north of the Glenvar branch library on the east side of Daugherty Road (VA 643) approximately 0.1 mile north of its intersection with West Main Street (US 11/460). The property is in the Glenvar Community Planning Area and urban services are available. TopographyNegetation: The proposed site for the assisted living facility drops gently east to west. The 5.5 acres west of the proposed building is generally flat. All parcels are grass-covered and all affected properties border the tree-lined Big Bear Branch. Shamrock Park ballfields formerly occupied portions of the proposed building site. Surrounding Nei4hborhood: Public and institutional uses are found south of the subject property (Virginia State Police Division Headquarters and the County's Glenvar Library and Fort Lewis Fire Station). Tiny World Child Care and vacant industrial land owned by Krueger Metals lies west across Daugherty Road. North of the proposal are the Medeco High Security and Transkrit Imaging Center Industries. To the east stands °The Oaksn assisted living facility. B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Layout/Architecture: The concept plan indicates proposed facility construction immediately west of the existing Oaks building. The structure would occupy the southwest corner of the overall retirement community which includes the Richfield Nursing Center (skilled and intermediate nursing care), The Oaks and T. Stuart Payne (assisted living), Knollwood and Richfield Lake Estates (retirement housing) and Ridgecrest (apartments for the elderly). The dementia specificlAlzheimer's center is projected to be a 45,000 square foot building serving 80 to 100 patients. A patient to staff ratio of five-to-one is planned with a total staff of approximately 100 including medical, administrative, and maintenance personnel. The petitioner's architect proposed building height at one story with awood-trimmed brick exterior. Access~raffic Generation: The site will be served by a new entrance off Daugherty Road approximately 350 feet north of its intersection with US 11 and by an extension of the private access leading to the existing Oaks building. Sight distance at the new access off Daugherty appears capable of meeting VDOT minimum requirements. The 1994 ADT count for the southernmost 0.34 mile of Daugherty. Road was 2,261. Four accidents were reported from 1991-1995. US 11 carries approximately 11,000 vehicles per day. New trip generation is estimated at a maximum of 400 to 500 trips per day (based on ITE projections of 4 trips/employee/weekday plus visitors). New proposed parking indicated on the concept plan in addition to unused parking normally available at other existing Richfield Community facilities is expected to accommodate all potential motorists. u ~o Fire & Rescue/Utilities: The County's Fort Lewis Station is 500 feet from the proposed facility. • The property can be served by an~ existing 12" water line on the west right-of-way of Daugherty Road. An 8" public sewer line is slated for construction along Daugherty Road. Currently, a 4" private force main crosses the site behind the branch library. Drainage/Floodplain: A flood study will be required due to the quantity of upstream acreage drained by the subject property. Currently the site is outside federal study limits. C. CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The property is designated Core by the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. Institutional uses are encouraged with high compatibility in Core areas. The proposal is consistent with Policy C-1 which advocates the development of intensive, mixed use urban development, Policy C-2 which specifies that each Core area be served by an arterial highway, and Policy C-2 which calls for coordinated site design regarding efficient site-to-site movement, shared vehicular access points, and architectural harmony with adjacent buildings. D. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD The proposed development provides the opportunity for joint use of future access, parking, and stormwater management facilities with the Glenvar Library. Review and approval of site and building plans, erosion and sediment control and stormwater management will be required. PART I I I STAFF CONCLUSIONS The proposed rezoning and Special Use Perm+', request would allow the applicant to expand the scope of proposed services for a portion of the elderly population with a demonstrated need-- Alzheimer's patients. No negative impacts are anticipated. • COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 5204 Bernard Dr. . P.0. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 ( 540` 772-2068 FAX (540) 772-2108 ~ I For staff use only) "-1) ~ ~ z ~ yv ~~ date rec ved: ' ~ Y received by: ~l ~ ~~ c- ; , applica ion f ~ ~ ~~ /I PC/BZA dater /~ / ~ placards issued: BOS date: G f Case Number: r ono • Proposed Zoning: C-2 (with special exception) ~~staffUse o.riy Pro osed Land Use: Dementia S ecif is Use Type: p p (Alzheimer's) Assisted Living Facility Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES X NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES ~ NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being pro~iered with this request? YES Y NO Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: iv~a Is the application complete? Please chec4c if enc:osed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF AfVY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMFLETi=. ws v ws v ws v ~~ Consultation 3 1 /2" x 1 ? " concept plan Application fee Appiicaticn ~ ~ -Metes and bounds description '?:~ Proffers, if applicable Justification ~~ Water and s2vver application Adjoining property owners l hereby certify that / am either th o am acting with the knowledge an cc Owner's Signature: of the property or the dwner's agent or contract purchaser and Larry j~. Degen ,/?~ARTIN & ASSOC I:~TES , P , C , Fbi S(aff Use On/y: Case Number `-''' ~. Applicant RICHFIELD RETIREIviENT COIvih1UNITY_ The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification far the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. The proposed land use conforms with the purposes of the zoning regulations in that the property is near a major arterial thoroughfare (US 11/460), it is a service related use, will be compatible with adjacent land uses, ~ and will serve the community and Roanoke County in general. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County comprehensive Plan. The rezoning and special use permit of the subject property is not in conflict with the comprehensive plan of the County in that it will allow the expansion of the Richfield Retirement Center, located on an adjacent 49.3 acre parcel. The Center performs a vital function in the community, this expansion will al-low for the service of another portion of the region's population (those diagnosed with Alzheimer's). Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the propery itself, the adjoining properies, and the surrcunding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. The proposed facility is located so that it is served by adequate water (12" main) and sewer (currently under construction) facilities. The property is in very close proximity to the Fort Lewis Fire & Rescue Center. Due to the nature of the facility, a minimal amount of automobile traffic will be added to Daugherty Road and there will be no impact on the school facilities. The residents of the facility will not leave the premises. t9 oK ;.,.,,.,„ Al1N(iWW00 1N 11132! : ~°. o.'~ ~mc .,,.s° o o F G ' N S ~• t • u a \ V~~ Q V '~i i• J W U Q 0.. F- W W m Z C~ ` o a N ~ W 1~•1 Z J O i •i i / _~ /~'~~ / ~ :~ 1 ~~~ ,.i.r,: ;.a;, -`~.... `l l sh ` Z W N O O OL ` z _~ ~ } o ~ Z m ~~ ~~ w o ~~' Z ~ ~ i W ~ ~N ~ ~ / ~- . ~ ~.n o ° ~~ ~ , ~ ~ Q ~J ~ W of ~ w~ T . w U I N vi~ ~ J Q. i ~/I ^ ~ *~ ~a a ~ I t ---+,,,j .:u ~ _ Zh ri t9 Z ( ~ D ~ < U ~ ~ W CL L ~ V~-- ~~Sw ~ ~.tJ~ r ~ m oz J z D Z W ~ J_ ~ '- o~ i u ~lno~ ~s ~n O o x L~.1 m J ~ ' ^ V Z F U1 X W I ~' i '~ w ~- w _~ U Z ~ N N V 0 0 0 0 in ~ W ~ ~ O Z C7 ~ Z Q F- W N . X ~ W ~ u-y F~~ NORTH .. - ., a - - °~ ~ l ~ a -~ ,.. f ~ llf4 4' / ~~ O 1 .rl // ••700 ~ YtM w rw / 1~• KI .\ 1VY• • 1 \ ~ l ~ 3 \ y ~ j~ `-L ~. ,11 \~m .. l ~ ~ 1, !~~ y~ » r = i.• / .vr a7ir r` 1 mar/ ///``` '.. / ~ ` 7n1 ~/ ~ ~ ~ n ~ l ~ ` 1 Y.1 ~- ? `~~ - - 1'• ro7 F I ~ / r Si.. ~\ '' `. 1 _ ~ us ' 5~ M1 i ~ y ~ ~ ec I~' ~1 i ~ ~ ~ ° } ~ J.OO:c ni n,w~ M / 4 . I '` W 1•. fi G7 " ~r ~ / 1~ Is ~ 9 x.73 .~C , ~/ '~ \ ~ ' ~ ~ / ~ 3 ~ ~Z. / ` Ji'• •+ I • .:2 3 ~ {~ \ ~ ~n \i 0 I h6 r-- , . ~' RICHFIELD RETIREMENT COMMUNITY = DEPARTi~iJ'r OF PLA1V1Vii~'G C-1 I-1 TO C-2 ~ SPECIAL USE PERMIT _ PND ZONING , 55.09-1=20..x; 20.2 & p!o 55.13-~-2 :~ .. 1.1. ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, AUGUST 27, 1996 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF APPROXIMATELY 5.5 ACRES OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 0.1 MILE NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF ROUTE 460 AND DAUGHERTY ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 55.09-1-20.1, 55.09-1-20.2 AND PART OF 55.13-1-2) IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF I-1 AND C-1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2, WITH CONDITIONS, AND GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT ASSISTED LIVING AND ELDERLY HOUSING FACILITIES, UPON THE APPLICATION OF RICHFIELD RETIREMENT COMMUNITY WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on July 23, 1996, and the second reading and public hearing were held August 27, 1996; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on August 6, 1996; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing approximately 5.5 acres, as described herein, and located approximately 0.1 mile north of the intersection of Route 460 and Daugherty Road (Tax Map Number 55.09-1-20.1, 55.09-1-20.2 and part of 55.13-1-2) in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of I-1 and C-1, Industrial District and Office District, to the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of 1 u-y Richfield Retirement Community. 3. That the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing the following condition which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts: (1) Development of the property shall be in substantial conformity with the submitted schematic site plan prepared by Martin and Associates dated June 26, 1996. 4. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Richfield Retirement Community to construct assisted living and elderly housing facilities located approximately 0.1 mile north of the intersection of Route 460 and Daugherty Road in the Catawba Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1-456 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved; and 5. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: "New Lot B" as shown on Resubdivision for County of Roanoke, prepared by T. P. Parker dated July 11, 1996. 6. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. zoning.richfield 2 ~ ~ ~ ~--~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, AUGUST 27, 1996 ORDINANCE 082796-15 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 0.82-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 3422 OGDEN ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 77.15-1-3) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-3 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-1 UPON THE APPLICATION OF BARRY L. MARSH WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on May 28, 1996, and the second reading and public hearing were held August 27, 1996; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on August 6, 1996; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 0.82 acre, as described herein, and located at 3422 Ogden Road (Tax Map Number 77.15-1-3) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-3, Medium Density Multi-Family Residential District, to the zoning classification of C-1, Office District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Barry L. Marsh. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at the northeasterly corner of the 0.04 acre parcel conveyed to G. C. Loyd and Mary A. Loyd by H. W. Loyd and Goldie K. Loyd by deed dated June 8, 1972, of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, 1 Virginia, in Deed Book 946, page 416, on the present southerly side of Ogden Road (Secondary Route 681); thence with a line in an easterly direction 25 feet southerly from the center line of said road about 50 feet to an angle point; thence continuing with the southerly side of Ogden Road in an easterly direction, diverging from the center line of same, and with the center line of the old road, passing the easterly side of the original Loyd 3 acre tract at about 82 feet, in all about 83 feet, to a point on the easterly side of the .02 acre parcel conveyed by deed dated August 4, 1954, to Gordon C. Loyd from Pierson H. Gould, et us., and conveyed to Gordon C. Loyd and Mary H. Loyd by deed dated December 5, 1975, of record in aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 1052, page 827; thence S. 25 deg. 22' W. about 130 feet to a point; thence N. 79 deg. 59' W. 15.0 feet to a point; thence S. 31 deg. 00' W. about 135 feet to a post; thence N. 71 deg. 33' W. 119.11 feet to a point; thence N. 31 deg. 00' E. 199.24 feet to an iron stake, crossing a branch and passing a sycamore tree on line; thence N. 56 deg. 24' W. 50.5 feet to an iron stake; thence N. 9 deg. 56' W. 20 feet, more or less, to a point on the southerly side of Ogden Road; thence with the southerly side of Ogden Road in an easterly direction about 20 feet to a point, said point being 25 feet southerly from the center line of Ogden Road; thence continuing with the southerly line of Ogden Road in an easterly direction about 53 feet to the point and place of Beginning, containing 0.79 acre, more or less. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Supervisor Eddy 2 A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Ho on, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 3 •-- NORTH I / ~ 333100 r` ,.•~ , wss ~ ,t ~ ~~ i ~ JJ Sp ~~~ 57 'a~ L23 4c ~~ , ~~\ `~ ~'~ - R-3 208Ae } J~ *b* s~/ ~ ~~ ~~l 7137 ~,1 M :'/' ,1 o~i~ Y 3J2S d rl'\ „• \On r .r;i~/ i~ 333046 47 '.~3s ~ 44 \ 3124 _ 45 33is ..~. ro ~~ C -- ~ 5s 3.22 Ae r 2 4 'saz R 3 - . i.aoAt w~ 408Ae 4C) I'' ~ -~ ~ ~ 4 ~_ ~ ~~ ~' .r ~ 7zrc ~ 42 ~ u V~ 43 3~0+ 330 q ~~ m b ' O C s 48 --- `31 _ U ~. .:. ¢ .. R~3 -. J ~~ ~ /i_Ll JJJp G'U ~ JJq 6 ~._c~ _ 10.33 Ac ~'-v I~ 2= J .~ 4 ~ ~ ~ -~ =s ~ AA4 ny r g ~ ~`~ I 7 ~~ ~/ ~ .: ~ ~ ~ ~ :r .a -t bti'1 ~ ty '~ ',T 73 a ` (LaZAc(C b J ^j V J ' .~• v 7 ~ ~ \T _ ~' DEp~1~T!`~v'I' OF PZ.P1'v~TI~G BARRY MARSH P1VD ZONING R-3 to C-1 :~ ~~~ Map ~ 77.15-t-3 .. (~C PETITIONER: BARRY MARSH CASE NUMBER: 16-6/96 Planning Commission Hearing Date: August 6, 1996 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: August 27, 1996 A. REQUEST Petition of Barry L. Marsh to rezone 0.82 acre from R-3 to C-1 to construct professional offices, located at 3422 Ogden Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION Mr. Witt announced that he would be abstaining from all discussion on the petition due to a conflict of interest and left the room. The Commission expressed concern with losing more multifamily residential land to office use; the inventory of higher density land appears to be shrinking. However, the Commisioners agreed that they were pleased with the proposal (situating the building with the lay of the land) since the site is a challenge to develop due to topography. The architect commented that in order to minimize excavation and disruption of the site, the building will be terraced into the hillside. In response to the Commission regarding fire vehicle access, staff noted that the applicant spent considerable time with the Fire Marshal to address this issue. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS None. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Thomason moved to recommend approval of the following roll call vote: AYES: Robinson, Ross, Hooker, Thomason NAYS: None ABSENT: Witt F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: the request. The motion carried with _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report _ Other Terrance H ringto ecretary Roanok ounty anning Commission • STAFF REPORT ~ ' ~, PETITIONER: BARRY MARSH -CASE NUMBER: 16-6/96 PREPARED BY: TIM BEARD DATE: JULY 24, 1996 PARTI A. Executive Summary This is an unconditional request to rezone 0.82 acre from R-3 medium density multifamily residential to C-1 office commercial in order to construct and operate professional offices. Single and multifamily residential, office commercial and undeveloped properties comprise the area in general. The petitioner's site is designated Development by the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. This proposal is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's Development designation. Traffic impacts are anticipated considering the subject site's proximity to the Colonial Avenue/Ogden Road intersection. A flood study may also be required due to a Murray Run tributary which passes through the applicant's site. B. Description Petition of Barry L. Marsh to rezone 0.82 acre from R-3 to C-1 to construct professional offices, located at 3422 Ogden Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District. C. Applicable Regulations General offices are permitted by right in the C-1 office district. No specific use and design standards apply under Article IV, Section 30-80. The complete range of ordinance regulations including and not limited to building setbacks, height, building and lot coverage, signage, exterior lighting, screening and buffering and parking- will apply in addition to various requirements of other County departments. A commercial entrance permit will be required by VDOT. Site development plans will be reviewed and approved by County staff before a building permit is issued. 2 u °" . • A. Analysis of Existing Conditions PART II Location: The subject property is situated at 3422 Ogden Road, approximately 500 feet east of the Colonial Avenue/Ogden Road intersection. The site is in the Cave Spring Community Planning Area and urban services are available. TopographyNegetation: The proposed site is moderately to steeply sloped and is centrally bisected by a small branch which feeds the heavily developed Murray Run watershed. The branch is not a studied stream per FEMA's National Flood Insurance Program. Currently an abandoned, deteriorating one-story frame dwelling stands 20 feet north of the stream. The remainder of the property rises sharply north and south of the house and stream and is heavily vegetated with deciduous and, to a lesser extent, evergreen trees. The applicant intends to remove the dilapidated building. Surrounding Neighborhood: The subject parcel is zoned R-3. Mixed uses occur throughout the immediate area. R-3 zoned single family homes stand east and west of the applicant's site. Vacant R-3 zoned parcels lie further west at the corner of Ogden and Colonial and across Colonial Avenue. The Bent Tree and Pebble Creek apartment complexes (zoned R-3 and R-4, respectively) are found to the south. North across Ogden Road lies a vacant, conditionally zoned C-1 tract and C-1 zoned physicians' offices. B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Lavout/Architecture: The applicant's concept plan indicates a 2,700 square foot building footprint located south of the creek. Two additional floors recessed into the hillside are also at the concept stage bringing the total building size to three stories containing a maximum 6,400 square feet. Each floor would have on-grade access. Final design may be of any type permitted by C-1 regulations. The accompanying parking area planned north of the branch would access Ogden Road at the extreme northwest corner of the site. As drawn, the parking lot could accommodate 22-24 vehicles. Per ordinance, a minimum of 3.5 parking spaces are required per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area for general office uses. A slight reduction in total building area or increase in parking lot area appears likely (6,400 sq.ft. Of building would necessitate 26 parking spaces including loading area constructed and maintained with a Category I surface). Access/Interior Circulation: One 30-foot wide entrance is proposed off Ogden Road accessing a 24-foot wide driveway leading to the parking lot. VDOT is expected to require a taper and right- turn lane for the eastbound lane of Ogden Road. A left-turn lane for westbound Ogden traffic is also possible. Sight distance is also a concern looking east from the proposed entrance. The existing concept plan would require an approximate 30-foot long pedestrian walkway over the branch connecting the parking area to the proposed building. Cam-' Interior landscaping will not be required if the total parking supply does not exceed 24 spaces. • The applicant has raised the possibility of employing innovative landscaping or architectural design to achieve a screening and buffering effect equivalent to the normally required Type C buffer yard and materials along the south, east and west borders. Traffic Generation/Existing Conditions: The 1994 ADT on Ogden Road was 10,088 vehicles on the segment from the Colonial Avenue intersection 0.19 mile east to the Roanoke City limits. For Colonial Avenue, the 1994 ADT was 11,198 vehicles between Overdale Road and Ogden Road and 12,283 vehicles from Ogden Road to Woodland Drive. Three accidents were reported on the 0.19 mile stretch of Ogden Road between Colonial Avenue and the Roanoke City limits from 1991 to 1995. Traffic generated by the proposed use is not projected to exceed 100-150 trips per day. Fire & Rescue/Utilities/Drainage: Emergency vehicle travel time is estimated at between four and eight minutes. Available to the site are 16-inch public water and 10-inch public sewer lines. Fire flow should be adequate for offices proposed. On-site stormwater detention could be accomplished by routing runoff under or near the proposed parking area or, in a more unlikely scenario, into the branch. C. CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The subject property is designated Development by the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. The • Development designation limits office uses with moderate compatibility. Policies of this designation are geared toward residential projects rather than office commercial. Among the applicable Development category land use determinants are water and sewer availability, major street access, urban sector location, and environmental capacity. Utility availability, street access, and urban location tend to support the proposal. Environmental capacity will hinge on careful management of the slopes and stream. D. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Site and building plans, erosion and sediment control and stormwater management plans must be reviewed and approved. The proposal can comply with the zoni~~g ordinance with modifications and additions. PART I I I STAFF CONCLUSIONS The applicant's request to construct professional offices is generally consistent with the Development designation of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. Although not located in either Transition or Core land use categories, the proposal complies with the purpose of the C-1 district-providing for efficient office uses in the urban service area serving both community and countywide needs. The request promotes efficiency in urban land development in an overall neighborhood context. . .` A "- fi L • Z 38 • COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING S2o4 Bernard- 9r. .. P.O. Box 29800 - - Roanoke, VA 24018 - (540' 772-2068 FAX (5401 772=2108 For staff use only l ~ _ ~ . dater i e : • 9 received .~ ~ _ application e•~ , ,L• _ PC/BZA ate: l~/ ~-l ~G to placa ds issued: 30S date: Case Number: f / `_ 1~ j / (~~ ~C'( (~3 Check type of application filed (check all that apply): [~Xl REZONING ^ SPECIAL USE ^VARIANCE Applicant's name: Barry L. Marsh Phone: 776-6322 Address: P.O. Box 21193 Zip Code24018 Roanoke, VA Owner's name: Ogden Road Partnership Phone: 776-6322 Address: P • 0. Box 21193 Zip Code: 24018 Roanoke, VA Location of property: Tax Map Number: 77.15-1-3 3422 Ogden Road Magisterial District: Cave S ri n Community Planning Area: ~AvFSpa~~-c- Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: R-3 0.82 acres Existing Land use: Abandoned single family resident sq.ft. :~: Proposed Zoning: C-1 For Staff Use Only Proposed Land Use: Professional Offices Use Type: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES X NO IF N0, A VAR(.-,NCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria fcr the requested Use Type? YES X NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being pro~~~rad with this request? YES ~~O Variance of Sections} of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v ws v ws v Consultation 8 1(2" x 1 i " concept plan Application fee • Application ~~<- Metes and bounds description ~~:; Proffers, if applicable Justification ~"~~~ Water and sewer application Adjoining propery owners l hereby certify that l am ei er the owner of th property or the owner's a ent or contract purchaser and am acting with the know/ed e an e t of ~' e owner Owner's Signature: 4400 - 2GG (sot) srac3nans arw~ rota nNlaarU ' ~rovraar ~iY/ ~~1.~71Nb'.~ 91c~'.~~Oc~ 1 s ' aroma ~~~ Q~tt `~ ~~~ a ~~ ~ ~~~~0 ~° ~og~~ ~ b ~ ~~ ~~. 10 ~~~0 a^~ ~m~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ .. ,~ ~ W~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~~~oz `~8~~ ~~~h ~~ ; ~, ~~~~~ ~~e ~~~~ ~hh ~b~ 2e~ Q I < <o h ~+ q ^ ~ v ~ ` ~ ~i aOOOo. Q 2 ~~~~ ~~~~ ~ z ~ , o~ q ~t4e~,~. ~\4 {~/~ ~~~~ ~ ~ e~~Wa~~ o ~~ ~ ~ q ~~~~~~ ~ ! ~~~ .~ ~ ~ wok ~h ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~: ~ $~ RECGWD u'v' PAGE 114 DEED BOOK 1153 a ~. ~, z, ~~b. ~h^ ~ ~.~~\ W 0 t ~~ ~ ~~ ti e r' . h 0 0 I. _' HaRiN • /b* ~* ~ ~ i3.7a x ~' O 3337 ~,! ~ 3350 2 1~ 1.•~ ~ ~ _ , -P~`~31ac u ~ ~ ~L t J `~ .- _ 57 L23 nc C- ~ \~ R~3 \~~ \ b ~ ^/ 7•T .. ~,~L~ ~ O ~. .~ L_ ! -, ~ . a ~~ = DEPA.~Z,fE:~J'I' Or PLP1'~1NI~G BARRY MARSH . _ AND 7.ONING R-3 to C-1 i „ ~ Map ~ 77.15-1-3 48 ` ~• T~1=47 ~- ~ 38 a.zzac "` / \ •-- o C 48 ~ _ r ~, _ U u-tl ~ %ios 6 y -• A - ~ G1 + ~ /w•G1 -~ ~U ,~,~ ~ ~~' ~ 1121 d ~~~ n ~o ~, .~aod .c~ ~ 112a }' 43 111046 ~ n fY s ~ ~~ ,t 32TG `~ ,~ 42 ~ (~~ 43 310, 44 ~ 33+o a 13~s i. a n~~ C~ .~`° AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, AUGUST 27, 1996 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 0.82-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 3422 OGDEN ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 77.15-1-3) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-3 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-1 UPON THE APPLICATION OF BARRY L. MARSH WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on May 28, 1996, and the second reading and public hearing were held August 27, 1996; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on August 6, 1996; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 0.82 acre, as described herein, and located at 3422 Ogden Road (Tax Map Number 77.15-1-3) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-3, Medium Density Multi-Family Residential District, to the zoning classification of C-1, Office District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Barry L. Marsh. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at the northeasterly corner of the 0.04 acre parcel conveyed to G. C. Loyd and Mary A. Loyd by H. W. Loyd and Goldie K. Loyd by deed dated June 8, 1972, of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 946, page 416, on the present southerly side of Ogden Road (Secondary Route 681); thence with a line C..~C~ "` in an easterly direction 25 feet southerly from the center line of said road about 50 feet to an angle point; thence continuing with the southerly side of Ogden Road in an easterly direction, diverging from the center line of same, and with the center line of the old road, passing the easterly side of the original Loyd 3 acre tract at about 82 feet, in all about 83 feet, to a point on the easterly side of the .02 acre parcel conveyed by deed dated August 4, 1954, to Gordon C. Loyd from Pierson H. Gould, et us., and conveyed to Gordon C. Loyd and Mary H. Loyd by deed dated December 5, 1975, of record in aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 1052, page 827; thence S. 25 deg. 22' W. about 130 feet to a point; thence N. 79 deg. 59' W. 15.0 feet to a point; thence S. 31 deg. 00' W. about 135 feet to a post; thence N. 71 deg. 33' W. 119.11 feet to a point; thence N. 31 deg. 00' E. 199.24 feet to an iron stake, crossing a branch and passing a sycamore tree on line; thence N. 56 deg. 24' W. 50.5 feet to an iron stake; thence N. 9 deg. 56' W. 20 feet, more or less, to a point on the southerly side of Ogden Road; thence with the southerly side of Ogden Road in an easterly direction about 20 feet to a point, said point being 25 feet southerly from the center line of Ogden Road; thence continuing with the southerly line of Ogden Road in an easterly direction about 53 feet to the point and place of Beginning, containing 0.79 acre, more or less. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. zoning.marsh ~m~ -- -_ -_ -_ -_ -_ i AGENDA ITEM NO. y-~ APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC FIEARING -ORDINANCE -CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~Z©~l~G ~ ~cf r-'~-~ ~9rc~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROU SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROU ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME ~' , f.~~~ f ~ ~ ~e T~57~onPr ADDRESS ~~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~1~' PHONE / // - --__ --. .._,. new c _. P P ' . . . . O~ ROAN ~F L ~ • ~ z o~ ;ate 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (540) 772-2004 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (540) 772-2193 September 4, 1996 ._ .. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BOB L. JOHNSON, CHAIRMAN HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS. VICE-CHAIRMAN VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FENTON F. "SPIKE" HARRISON, JR. CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (540) 772-2005 Mr. John D. Lyons 114 Niblick Drive Salem, VA 24153 Dear Mr. Lyons: On behalf of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County and its citizens, we extend our sincere sympathy to you and your family on the death of your wife, Ms. Joan Lyons. Ms. Lyons was a capable, loyal and dedicated employee of Roanoke County, and she will be greatly missed by the citizens she served, her fellow employees and staff. .The attached resolution of appreciation honoring Ms. Lyons for over fourteen years of services to Roanoke County was adopted at our Board Meeting on August 27, 1996. At the suggestion of Supervisor Minnix, the entire resolution was read in open session as a tribute to Ms. Lyons. Please accept this resolution with our deepest sympathy for your loss. Sincerely, Bob L. Johns Roanoke Cou Attachment BLJ/bjh cc: Joseph Sgroi, Director, Human Resources ~~~~~ ~~ ~~~~.~2.~ P.O. BOX 29800 Chairman Board of Supervisors ® R~yd~a Paper O~ ROANp,~-F ~ _~ ,, T Z °v a~ 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (540) 772-2004 C~~~tx~#~ a# ~.a~xx~~~e P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (540) 772-2193 August 29, 1996 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BOB L. JOHNSON, CHAIRMAN HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS, VICE-CHAIRMAN VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FENTON F: "SPIKE" HARRISON, JR. CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (540) 772-2005 Rev. James W. Reynolds Retired, United Methodist Church 5139 Cherokee Hills Drive Salem, VA 24153 Dear Rev. Reynolds: On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, I would like to thank you for offering the invocation at our meeting on Tuesday, August 27, 1996. .- We believe it is most important to asks for•-divine guidance at these meetings and. the Board is very grateful for your contribution. us. Thank you again for sharing your time and pour words with With kindest\regards, Bob L. J Roanoke Chairman y Board of Supervisors ® Recycled Paper I N T E R MEMO O F F I C E To: Board of Supervisors ,. ,~ From: Elmer C. Hodge Subj: Metropolitan Transportation District Study Committee Date: August 20, 1996 Roanoke City Manager Bob Herbert contacted me today to inform me that the City Council has appointed their representatives to the Metropolitan Transportation District Study Committee. They are Tom Robertson, Bittle Porterfield, and Vice Mayor Linda Wyatt. They have not yet made a public announcement of these appointments. I recommend that the Board of Supervisors make their appointments at the August 27 meeting. Following appointments from both governing bodies, I believe the plans are to hold the first meeting which would also include Mr. Herbert, Mr. Dibling, Mr. Mahoney and me. CC: Paul Mahoney, County Attorney tS5'~ e " ~~rsc~ n/r11e1 -~py (.qY.. o ~jr.~.J ~ r MEMORANDU T0: Elmer Nudge, County Administrator 1i,~ry 1llcr~ ClE~rl~: t~~ the Board of Si~pervsprs FROM: John M. Chambliss, Jr., Asst. County Adm SUBJECT: Requested Work Sessions by the $oard of DATE: August 2'7, 1996 At the August 2'7 meeting of the Board of Supervi made for upcoming meetings and work sessions: ator pervlsors the following requests were 1. Based on the letter sent to the School Board, a j int meeting similar to the Board's recent retreat to discuss communications issues, the bl e ribbon study committee and other items of mutual interest. We are awaiting a response fr m the School Board at this time. 2. Response to the Regional Chamber of Commerce' invitation to meet with the Board of Supervisors. A listing of possible dates is being circulat d. 3. A joint meeting with the Salem City Council. A lit of possible dates is being circulated. It is the County's turn to host this event. 4. A work session to establish the Mission Statemen and Objectives for the County. While most departments have their own mission statements at this time, the overall direction for the County needs to be established so that the departm ntal goals may be directed to accomplishing the common goals for the County, 5. Bring to the Board the completed Public/Private (Partnership guidelines and policy mentioned at the August 2"7 meeting. 6. Work Session for the September 24 meeting to c Budget work sessions and not funded which could be cc Board Contingency Account. The Board felt that ~250,0~ account was for this type program. They also asked he Partnership could go back into this account or be used ~sider projects listed during the sidered for funding by using the 1 of the monies originally in that the payback from the Public/Private or other public/private programs. Mr. Eddy asked for information on the change in'~~tax collection dates and Diane Hyatt indicated that the information would be available soon. '~ There was not consensus on the Board to bring this as a work session at this time. Based upon the recent retreat held by the Board members, they had requested minutes from the 22 member committee looking at the school needs of the County. Dr. Gordon brought a copy which has been distributed (copy attached} and indicated we would receive them in the future. The notes taken at the retreat and recorded on flip charts has been turned in to the Clerk's office and Mary has been asked to have them typed and put together in a usable format. It was noted that a discussion was needed to consider the previous Park Master Plan and to consider regionalization of parks. The review should look at where we are and where will we go. Other topics from the Board meeting which could be directed to specific teams or departments have been sent under separate cover to those individuals. A, Arnold Covey - Drainage Maintenance Program B. Tim Gubala - Hanging Rock Battlefield Trail Project Public /Private Partnership Policy Recovery of monies from Public /Private Partnership C> Diane Hyatt/Paul Mahoney Payment in Lieu of Taxes for Tax Exempt including Churches cc Diane Hyatt Pete Haislip MEMO - 6/3/96 To: Supervisors From: Lee B. Eddy Subject: Suggested Budget Increases At the budget work session on 5/28/96 I suggested that we use $200,000 to $300,000 of our expected reserves to fund operating and capital additions to the FY96/97 budget. I have reviewed the addback requests, some of my personal suggestions, and the donation lists and offer the following for your consideration: A. OPERATING BUDGET 1. Increase the budget for street lights which has been flat for the past several years. This is a service that citizens can see, but are often rejected in their applications. Lower the qualifying point score level to reflect the increased funding. Add $5000. 2. I am concerned that our judicial magistrates have a high turnover. Ideally the state should set salaries sufficient to prevent high turnover, but that is riot facing reality. The court staff requested $32,728 in local funds to supplement state salaries. I suggest we add $10,000 this year. • 3. I worry that we are not taking full advantage of technology and suggest we add an MIS Programmer Analyst at a cost of $45,089. 4. I suggest we establish an award system .for employees who suggest good plans for cost savings and/or improved services. Ultimately it should more than pay for itself. Suggest $5000 for FY97. 5. I would like to see us do more with citizen volunteers for many activities in addition to Fire and Rescue. Suggest $15,000 for a part time position to work with Amy Shelor, and a newsletter. 6. Recommend an annual appropriation to add fire hydrants. This is another service that is highly visible to citizens. Suggest $5000. 7. Recommend an annual appropriation to fund small replacement items for Fire and Rescue. Suggest $40,000 for FY97 and check whether this is sufficient in future years. 8. Recommend an annual appropriation to fund small replacements and improvements for Parks and Recreation. Suggest $20,000 for FY97 and check whether this is sufficient in future years. 9. Recommend an annual appropriation to fund small replacements and improvements for Libraries. Suggest $15,000 for FY97 and check whether this is sufficient in future years. 10. Fund the Treasurer's request for a 24-hour telephone line and additional postage costs. Add $2975. 11. Fund additional CORTRAN slots. Our budget information did not include any details or justification, but apparently it is now difficult for our elderly and disabled citizens to get reservations. Add $10,000. *** SUBTOTAL FOR OPERATING BUDGET: $173,064 B. SMALL CAPITAL PROJECTS AND REPLACEMENTS: 1. Fund a low band tourist radio system jointly with Roanoke City, Salem and VDOT. Add $15,000. 2. Stabilize the stream bed in Garst Mill Park. Add $10,000. 3. Fund the law library security system. Add $500. 4. Replace the MIS line printer. Add $9000. 5. Fund one new 4WD vehicle for Garage II. Add $25,000. 6. Fund a new emergency generator for Bent Mountain Fire Station. The installed unsatisfactory unit was paid for by the volunteers a number of years ago. Most other stations recently received new units funded~by the County. Bent Mountain is subject to frequent power outages. Add $15,000. 7. Fund a replacement air compressor at Cave Spring Fire Station. This sounds to me like a critical back-up need. Add $15,000. *** SUBTOTAL FOR SMALL CAPITAL PROJECTS/REPLACEMENTS: $89,500 C. CONTRIBUTIONS: I reviewed the current staff recommendations, previous suggestions from Supervisors Minnix, Harrison and Eddy, plus the 5/31/96 memo from Harry Nickens, and developed the following recommendations. Only those that deviate from staff numbers are listed (K= $1000): Organization Minnix Eddy Harrison Nickens Staff Proposed Adult Care Center 5.OK 7.5K 6.OK 7.5K 5.DK 7.OK Big Bros./Sisters 1.OK 2.5K 2.5K 0 2.OK CCS Info/Ref. Ctr. 3.OK 4.OK 3.OK 3.OK 3.5K CASA 1.+K 3.OK 2.OK 2.OK 1.+K 2.OK Family Service 3.OK 4.OK 4.OK 3.OK 3.5K 5th Dist E&TConso. 3.0 4.+K 4.+K 3.OK 3.5K LOA 12.5K 15.OK 12.5K 15.OK 12.5K 15.OK Literacy Vol's 0 2.OK 1.OK 1.OK 0 1.OK Drug/Alc Abuse Cou. 0 1.OK 1.OK 1.OK 0 1.OK Speech/Hearing Ctr. 0.5K 1.OK 1.OK 1.OK 0.5K 1.OK BR Community Ser. 79.+K 100.OK 79.+K 79.+K 85.OK TAP 27.OK 30.OK 30.OK 30.OK 25.OK 30.OK Trans. Living Ctr. 15.OK 17.5K 15.OK 17.6K 15.OK 17.5K Art Museum 1.OK 2.OK 2.OK 0 2.OK Explore 160.OK 150.OK 150.OK 175.OK 157.OK ~160.OK Mill Mtn Zoo Op. 8.5K B.OK 7.5K 6.OK S.OK RV History Mus. 6.+K 7.OK 7.5K 7.5K 6.+K 7.5K Trans. Mus. Op. 12.OK 12.OK lO.OK lO.OK 12.OK Trans. Mus. Cap. 2.OK 0 2.OK 0 2.OK L. of Women Voters 300 300 300 275 300 D-Day Memorial 17.OK 0 0 lO.OK 0 lO.OK OUTLOOK Roanoke 0 1.OK 1.OK 0 1.OK VWCC Schol. Fund 5339 5339 5339 5274 5339 BR Soil/Cons Dist. 1.OK 1.5K ~1.SK 1.OK 1.25K Tour DuPont lO.OK 7.5K lO.OK 5.OK 7.5K *** SUBTOTAL - INCREASES FOR CONTRIBUTIONS: $50,605 SUMMARY,~ALL CATEGORIES: OPERATING BUDGET $173,064 SMALL CAPITAL/REPLACEMENTS 89,500 CONTRIBUTIONS 50,605 GRAND TOTAL $313,169 I would be pleased for the opportunity to discuss my reasons for these suggestions in further detail. -=copy:. Elmer Hodge -°~ Brent Robertson M);MORANDUM T0: Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance FROM: John M. Chambliss, Jr., Asst. County Administrator~~~-- SUBJECT: Work Session Request from the Board of Supervisors DATE: August 27, 1996 At the August 27 Board of Supervisors meeting, a request was made to prepare for a work session concerning payment in lieu of taxes by non profit organizations, including Churches. The following items were specifically requested for consideration as well as any other information as necessary: 1. What is the value of the existing non-profit property including Real Estate and Personal Property? 2. What are other localities doing about taxing this type of property? 3. What is the attitude of the commercial and development community about this subject. avoiding taxation? 4. What grandfather provisions could be considered for the implementation of a tax program so as not to tax current property, but properties in the future? It would be good to give background information on the process and values of properties in Roanoke County currently participating in a payment in lieu of tax program or service charge program today. I am certain that John Birckhead and Wayne Compton will have some information in their offices to assist in this project. Please coordinate with Elmer Hodge and Mary Allen the scheduling of this request. cc Elmer Hodge `Mary Aller~~' John Birckhead Wayne Compton Brent Robertson MEMORANDUM T0: Tim Gubala, Director of Economic Development FROM: John M. Chambliss, Jr., Asst. County AdministratorGy- SUBJECT: Items from the August 27 Board of Supervisors Meeting DATE: August 27, 1996 At the August 27 Board meeting, several items came up which will need your attention. 1. Supervisor Harrison had talked to Mrs. $elcher, the new green ways coordinator, and she indicated that there time constraints and problems with the Hinchee property as it relates to the Hanging Rock Battlefield Trail. Please contact these individuals and try to help resolve the issue when you return from vacation. 2. The Public /Private Partnership Policy was discussed as a part of the request to appropriate the monies for the Stormwater management program on the 460 East project. The Board specifically asked if the repayment could be placed back into their account. It was noted that there are other projects in the works and other requests would be forthcoming. 3. The Board asked that the Public /Private Partnership Policy be brought back for discussion. Suggested date is September 10. Please coordinate with Elmer Hodge and Mary Allen and move ahead tivith these items. cc Elmer Hodge Mary ,All,en Diane Hyatt MEMORANDUM TO: Arnold Covey, Director of Engineering and Inspections Paul Mahoney, County Attorney FROM: John M. Chambliss, Jr., Asst. County Administrator~~ SU$JECT: work Session for a Drainage Maintenance Program DATE: August 27, 1996 At the Board of Supervisors meeting on August 27, the Board requested a work session concerning the Drainage lafaintenance Program for the County. Please coordinate with Mary Allen and Elmer Hodge the scheduling of this work session and the preparation of said materials. cc Elmer Hodge 'Alary Alen MEMORANDUM T0: Supervisor Spike Harrison FROM: John M. Chambliss, Jr., Asst, County Administrator SUBJECT: Inquiries to Agenda Items for the August 27 Meeting DATE: August 27, 1996 Outlined below are responses to your inquiries to agenda items for today's Board meeting. I hope these help in your deliberations. ~at"~ 1. I have asked Dr. Gordon to call you concerning the two school bonding issues. She also plans to be present at the Board meeting to respond to any other inquiries. 2. H - 1. This property is part of an estate listed in the name of Winton Shelor ET ALS. I discussed the drainage concerns with Arnold Covey and it appears from preliminary study that the drainage from the proposed Church drains to a different water shed and does not go to Dennis Lane. There is also a box culvert going under 1-81 behind this property which may take part of the drainage. ~.~ 3. Barley Drive from Poor Mountain Road to the south side of the Norfolk Southern bridge has been in the State Secondary road system since the thirties. The developers of the subdivision .West Salem Forest. only had to connect to the existing secondary road. The only expenditure of funds was by the developer. I have forwarded your inquiry concerning Grey Fox to Arnold Covey and staff to see what needs to be done for that road to be considered for acceptance into the State system. ~, ~ 4. The subject property owned by Trent Development does not have access to Peters Creek Road. if developed with adjacent properties, it may allow for the entrance to be along Peters Creek Road. The proffered condition included within the package indicates that if entrance is provided from Burlington Road, the improvements will be in accordance with UDOT standards. 5. Tim Gubala is out this week and I do not have information about the Hanging Rock project. If you will give me your concerns, l will try to follow up on them. Attachment cc Board Members Elmer Hodge .~ o~ PoaNp,~F z ~` ~` ~ ~ 2 ~ .M ~a~ 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (540) 772-2004 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (540) 772-2193 MEMORANDUM BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BOB L. JOHNSON, CHAIRMAN HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS, VICE-CHAIRMAN VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FENTON F. 'SPIKE" HARRISON, JR. CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL'FUZZY' MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (540) 772-2005 TO: Elmer Hodge FROM: Spike Harrison ~`~,~(~ DATE: August 26, 1996 SUBJECT: AUGUST 27TH BOARD ACTIONS Elmer, I have a couple of problems concerning agenda items for Tuesday. I'll cover them by item. 1. E.2 & 3 on school bonds. I will have no trouble voting bu I have received ~,1 - complaints on several problems I wish to ask about ublicl concerning school `'~ % ~' construction projects. ~, ~~ ; 2. H.1 -did this property ever belong to Winton Shelor? Can I absolutely ~ guarantee no more stormwater problems for Dennis Lane from this building and parking :,;_ ~~ lot? 3, L.2 -Barley Drive. Have you seen this road? It is Dry Hollow but worse. A 9 foot wide road with a blind U under the railroad and then it widens to 18 feet. I (~r cannot follow the logic. If the other part of Barley Road is in the state system, then I have half a dozen places that should be added first. I cannot follow VDOT logic here or in many other places. I have a letter from the residents of Grey Fox behind Dixie Caverns. They need help and there are more of them. 1 ® Recyded Paper i, ~ ] 4. T.1 -Trent Development. I will only vote for this if no development from Burlington Drive -Peters Creek only. 5. I would like to add discussion of the Hanging Rock Battlefield Trail to the Executive Session. I talked to our new greenways coordinator, Mrs. Belcher, ~ Thursday, at the Fifth Planning District Commission meeting and she indicates that ~~~, there are time constraints and problems with the Hinchee property. FFH/bjh 2 0~ ROANp,Y~ ~ ~~ z ~ ~, ai 1838 MARY H. ALLEN, CMC CLERK TO THE BOARD ~~~~~ ~~ a0r~~~.~2.~ P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2005 FAX (703) 772-2193 August 28, 1996 Mr. J. Richard Cranwell 3634 Larson Oaks Drive Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Mr. Cranwell: BRENDA J. HOLTON DEPUTY CLERK I am pleased to inform you that, at their meeting held on Tuesday, August 27, 1996, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to reappoint you as a member of the Industrial Development Authority for another four year term. Your new term will begin on September 26, 1996, and expire on September 26, 2000. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, or appointed to any public body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act. Your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflict of Interest Act. State law requires that you take an oath of office before the Clerk of the Roanoke County Circuit Court. This oath must be administered prior to your participation on this Board. Please telephone Steven A. McGraw, at 387-6205, to arrange to have this oath administered, and Mr. McGraw has asked that you bring this letter with you. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Sincerely, • ~~-~-~-x...- Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures cc: Timothy W. Gubala, IDA, Secretary Steven A. McGraw, Clerk, Circuit Court ®q~~ p~ Printed by Brenda Holton / ADMO1 8/21/•9.6 9:22am From: Sue Patterson-Bane / ADMO1 To: Paul Mahoney / ADMO1 Subject: fwd: FDETC Lease --------------------------------------- ===NOTE====------=====8/21/96==8:43am== Is this a New Business item - approval by resolution or does it have to be by Ordinance. Fwd=by:=Paul=Mahoney==8/21/96==9:19am== Fwd to: Sue Patterson-Bane / ADMO1 ....................................... Yes, this is a new business item. Since the BofS already approved lease by ordinance in 1995 (?), I suggested to TWG that the extension could be authorized by resolution. I asked TWG to prepare BofS report, I will prepare resolution. Fwd=by:=Sue=Patterson=8/21/96==9:20am== Fwd to: Brenda Holton / ADMO1 ....................................... FYI Fwd=by:=Brenda=Holton__________________ Fwd to: Sue Patterson-Bane / ADMOl ....................................... Thanks for clearing that up for me. Page: 1 Printed by Mary Allen / ADMO1 8/2.1./96,. 7:38am --------------------------------------- From: Paul Mahoney / ADMO1 To: Susie Owen / ADM01 Subject: FDETC lease --------------------------------------- ===NOTE====------=====8/20/96==4:52pm== CC: Mary Allen / ADMO1, Sue Patterson-Bane / ADMO1 ....................................... Susie, please give this to TWG. I have reviewed the FDETC lease dated 3/28/1995, Ordinance No. 31495-5. The term was for 15 months, until 9/1/96. Section 11 of the lease provides that "This agreement may be extended by the County upon written request from the FDETC for an additional fifteen (15) months with the approval of the Board of Supervisors." Since BofS approval is required, please prepare a Board report for 8/27/96 meeting, referencing prior ordinance and lease agreement, but limit length of extension as we discussed with ECH yesterday. Thanks. Paul ~,B u~ ,, -~-~~` r ~' ~. ~,-- ~~ Page: 1 LEGAL NOTICE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, August 27, 1996, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Shining Stars Early Learning Centers Inc. for a Special Use Permit to operate a day care center, located at 5501 Florist Road, Hollins Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: August 9, 1996 ~ ~ L~~~~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times Tuesday, August 13, 1996 Tuesday, August 20, 1996 Direct the bill for publication to: Shining Stars Early Learning Centers Inc. Attn: Nora Sarver PO Box 14123 Roanoke, VA 24038 (540) 362-0021 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANOKE, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, August 27, 1996, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bemard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Wister Sowder for a Special Use Permit to construct a religious assembly, located between 7425 and 7502 Old Mill Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: August 9, 1996 ~ ~~~~~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times Tuesday, August 13, 1996 Tuesday, August 20, 1996 To be paid on delivery by: Wister Sowder 6989 Poage Valley Rd Ext Roanoke, VA 24018 (540) 774-6667 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANOKE, VA 24018 ~-~° LEGAL NOTICE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, August 27, 1996, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Richfield Retirement Community to rezone approximately 5.5 acres from I-1 and C-1 to C-2 and obtain a Special Use Permit to construct assisted living and elderly housing facilities, located approximately 0.1 mile north of the intersection of Route 460 and Daugherty Road, Catawba Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: August 9, 1996 Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times Tuesday, August 13, 1996 Tuesday, August 20, 1996 Direct the bill for publication to: Richfield Retirement Community PO Box 1240 Salem, VA 24153 (540) 380-4500 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANOKE, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, August 27, 1996, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Barry L. Marsh to rezone 0.82 acre from R-3 to C-1 to construct professional offices, located at 3422 Ogden Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: August 9, 1996 ~ ~~~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times Tuesday, August 13, 1996 Tuesday, August 20, 1996 Direct the bill for publication to: Barry L. Marsh Go Ogden Road Partnership PO Box 21193 Roanoke, VA 24018 (540) 776-6322 SEND AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANOKE, VA 24018 August 7, 1996 Note to LEE EDDY FROM BRENDA HOLTON RE: Police Traffic Unit Statistics Report You had requested a copy of the above report and was informed that it would be on the August 13th agenda. It has now been rescheduled for August 27th since the person reporting it out of town. J July 31, 1996 4:37 p.m. Note to file LBE called and requested a copy of the latest report of statistics for Police Traffic Unit. He said that it was changed from quarterly status to annual. He has a citizen request for information. When told that it was already scheduled to be on the agenda for August 13th, he asked that as soon as it is received, he would like a copy put in his mail folder. Brenda cc: NffIA ECH