Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout9/23/1997 - Regular~ pOANp,~.~ ,A `:. A 2 '~ ov ' ~ a~ 1838 ,~ ~,~,~ ~ ~~~~~~ ~~ ~~~x~~~ Worizing Document - subiect to revision ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF .SUPERVISORS AGENDA September 23, 1997 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement in order to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings or other programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County, please contact the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772-2005. We request that you provide at least 48-hours notice so that proper arrangements may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: The Reverend Steven W. Harris Baptist Children's Home 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS BLJ ANNOUNCED ITEM S-9 WILL BE CONTINUED TO 10/28/97 ECH ADDED ITEM C-1, RESO OF CONGRATULATIONS TO KPMG MHA PULLED ITEM J-1, AUGUST 19 MINUTES SO PMM CAN REVIEW BLJ ADVISED ITEM S-8 MIGHT BE DELAYED i ® Recycled Paper EXECUTIVE SESSION ITEM, ACQUISITION OF PRIVATE PROPERTY FOR PUBLIC USE WAS ADDED. C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Resolution of Congratulations to KPMG Peat Marwick LLP upon their 100th anniversary and in recognition of their contributions to the Roanoke Valley R-092397-1 BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE RESO S~ ACCEPTED BY: TRACY SMITH~SENIOR MANAGER, KPMG D. BRIEFINGS NONE E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request to appropriate funds to reimburse Botetourt County for prior year revenues collected in Jack Smith Industrial Park. (Diane Hyatt, Finance Director) A-092397-2 BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE $158,280.86 APPROPRIATION FROM UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE. URC WITH HCN ABSENT 2. Request from Schools for an advance of $50,000 for start up cost for Phase I of the School Capital Construction. (Martin L. Robison, Assistant School Superintendent) R-092397-3 FM MOTION TO APPROVE RESO AUTHORIZING ADVANCE OF $50,000 WITH RESO CORRECTED AS LBE SUGGESTED. URC WITH HCN ABSENT 3. Request for approval of expenditures from Public-Private Partnership Funds on behalf of PD Lodging Associates (Brian Duncan, Assistant Economic Development Director) 2 A-092397-4 BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE $74,148 PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP F ND URC WITH HCN ABSENT F. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING AFTER DISCUSSION OF ITEMS F-1 AND F-6 2ND & PUBLIC HEARING 10/28/97 URC WITH HCN ABSENT 1. First reading of ordinance to rezone 0.99 acre from R-1 to C-1 located on Valley Forge Avenue 100 feet south of the intersection of Valley Forge Avenue and Concord Place, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Maynard Manning. 2. First reading of ordinance to conditionally rezone 5 acres from R-3 to C-2 and obtain a Special Use Permit to bring a nonconforming use into conformity, located at 5300 Hawthorne Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Shenandoah Homes. 3. First reading of ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit to expand the existing restaurant with drive-thru window, located at 4369 Electric Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Wendy's of Western VA. 4. First reading of ordinance to amend conditions on 1.14 acres zoned C-2C to construct office buildings, located at 5440 Peters Creek Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Radford & Co. 5. First reading of ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit to construct a regional stormwater management basin (utility services, major) and for a Section 15.1-456 review for consistency with the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan, located 400 feet northwest of the intersection of 3 Ambassador Drive and Envoy Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of the City of Roanoke (Montclair). 6. First reading of ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit to construct a regional stormwater management basin (utility services, major) and for a Section 15.1-456 review for consistency with the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan, located 300 feet southeast of the terminus of Candlelight Circle, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of the City of Roanoke (North Lakes). 7. First reading of ordinance to rezone 2.044 acres from C-2 conditional to C-2 to construct an office building, located at 3743 Challenger Avenue, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Jack F. Walrond, Jr. 8. First reading of ordinance to rezone approximately 22 acres from R-1, R-3, and C-2C to C-2 in order to construct a retail store located on Route 220 and Valley Avenue, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Lowe's Co. Inc. 9. First reading of ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit to construct a 190 foot self-supporting broadcast tower, located at 5585 Catawba Hospital Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Ohio State Cellular Phone Co., Inc. G. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. First reading of an ordinance authorizing the construction of and financing for a Local Public Works Improvement Project - Brushy Mountain Water Project. (Gary Robertson, Utility Director) BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND -10/14/97 AYES-LBE,FM,BLJ NAYS-NONE 4 ABSTAIN-FFH ABSENT-HCN 2. First reading of ordinance authorizing the donation of lease of office space in the Roanoke County Administration Center to the Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) FM MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING WITH SUGGESTED CHANGES BY LBE AND DIANE HYATT 2ND -10/14/97 I~RC WITH HCN ABSENT H. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Second reading of ordinance authorizing the vacation of a portion of an existing 20 foot sanitary sewer easement across Lot 4, Block 4, Section 2 of Hollins Gardens. (Gary Robertson, Utility Director) 0-092397-5 BLJ MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC WITH HCN ABSENT 2. Second reading of ordinance to grant the right to use a County water line easement for private sanitary sewer service by Cicero H. Hall, Jr. and Doris B. Hall. (Gary Robertson, Utility Director) 0-092397-6 BLJ MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC WITH HCN ABSENT I. APPOINTMENTS 1. Fire Code Board of Appeals (Board of Adjustments and Appeals) LBE NOMINATED DAVID M. SHELTON.~JR. (ELECTRICAL ENGINEER) 5 2. Grievance Panel BOARD CONSENSUS TO ADD TWO ADDITIONAL ALTERNATES TO ASSURE MINORITY AND FEMALE REPRESENTATION. PMM TO BRING BACK HANDBOOK AMENDMENT ON 10114/97. 3. Hanging Rock Battleground and Rail Preservation Foundation. LBE NOMINATED TIM GUBALA TO SERVE ANOTHER 3-YEAR TERM WHICH WILL EXPIRE OCTOBER 25, 2000. 4. Industrial Development Authority FM NOMINATED BILL BRANCH TO ANOTHER FOUR-YEAR TERM WHICH WILL EXPIRE SEPTEMBER 27, 2001. 5. The Roanoke County Commission for Senior and Challenged Citizens. J. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT E D ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. R-092397-7 FM MOTION TO ADOPT RESO WITH ITEM J-1 REMOVED URC 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Grievance Panel and the Commission for Senior and Challenged Citizens. A-092397-7.a 6 3. Request for acceptance of Hollins Court Circle into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. R-092397-7.b 4. Resolution of appreciation upon the retirement of George H. Altice, Jr., General Services Department. R-092397-7.c 5. Donation of 15 foot drainage easement on property owned by Brian M. & Ellen Hancock to the Board of Supervisors. A-092397-7.d 6. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Lilies of the Gardens, Section 3. A-092397-7.e K. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS LBE REQUESTED WORK SESSION ON COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE BLJ SCHEDULED FOR 11/18/97 MEETING L. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS NE M. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS Supervisor Johnson: (1) Received memo from Tim Gubala regarding what other localities are doing regarding charging fees and a percentage of outstandina debt of IDA bond issues Need to investigate as source of funding for school capital needs, greenways and bikeways (3) Attended the Senior Expo at the Civic Center and thought eve one did an excellent fob. He noted that the County participated. (4) Noted that those dunning for Governor are recommending changes to the Personal Prope t~ tax but residents are beginning to look at the affect it will have on local governments. Supervisor Harrison: X11 Noted that taxes are set by the General Assembly. (2) Advised that on Saturday, September 20, Supervisor Eddy, Mayor Bowers and he, along with many others, cleared trails at Hanging Rock. (3) Also attended Marine Mud Run at Green Hill Park The crowd was tremendous and was very impressed. (4) Advised that there is someone along Mason Cove who is unhap.pv with the change of Mason Cove School to Glenvar Middle and Glenvar Hiah School, and parked a vehicle near the corner of Bradshaw and Route 311 advertising his displeasure with this and with other complaints. Asked Staff to check and see if there is zoning violation. (5) Thanked the Board for taking action on a water system for his neighborhood and honored Jess Bradley for keeping the system going for so Iona. Supervisor Eddy: (1) Advised he was pleased with the results of the SAT scores at Glenvar High school which were the highest in the Vallev~(2) On September 12 he attended a Pollution Prevention work shop sponsored by DEQ. They have pollution prevention office and are promoting the idea of local governments enacting pollution preventing activities. Asked staff to investigate whether program would be beneficial in County. BLJ asked ECH to prepare a report. (3) Attended a meeting on September 19 at Arnold Burton on new technology machinery tools donated to the school. (4 Sent a memo on September 17 requesting consideration of establishing a Commission on Youth to look at ganct activities, smoking, drinking and other issues affecting teens. He asked if there was support from other Board members. BLJ asked ECH to contact the School Superintendent and report back. (5) Suggested in a memo that a simplified financial report be developed to be used to educate citizens. BLJ and FFH agreed. ECH advised that it would take resource time and publication costs. Could be included in budget process. LBE advised he would be willing to develop the report. (6) Also sent memo regarding improving the utility billing format. ECH agreed and advised they are working on this, that the computer system would have to be replaced and that there are several alternatives. ECH reported on other potential changes in the utility billing system. He will report back to the Board in 4 to 6 weeks. (7) Asked if there had been an dprogress on reducing the cost of the Sewage T reat ment plant Gary Robertson responded that should have cost figu res back shortly and will report to the Board. ( 8) Was pleased with the 1998 positions on issues such as greenwaXs ~ stormwater managem ent, and protectinar__i~ aelines and viewsheds. recently adopted by the Regi onal omebuilders. upervisor Minnix: (1) Congratulated the Shell Station locat Route 419 across from Hardee's for their fine job of landscaping. (21 Received a petition from citizens from Springlawn that have concerns about the VDOT project. Asked Arnold Covey or ECH to respond and send him a copy of the response. (3) Will receive an invitation from Mill Mountain Zoo fora special day honoring elected officials. Encouraged the Board members to attend. (4) Attended Senior Expo and thought it was great! (5) Asked ECH about progress at RR Donnelly-Phase II. ECH updated Board and advised that Phase II is scheduled for 1999. N. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS 1. Dan Spangler. 2734 Embassy. Drive, _ asked about progress on the Montclair Detention Pond, and accfuisition of the Harris property ECH advised he had talked with Roanoke City officials and told them that the Harris property has to be completed before they come to the Board of supervisors for their Special Use Permit. 2. Reed McGhee. 1076 Quail. Drive, Goodview, VA. advised he had a groundhog under rental property located in Roanoke County and was dissatisfied with the response he got from Animal Control who informed him they did not work with wild animals, and would not allow him to borrow a trap. BLJ responded that he should complain to the state because state funds have been reduced. FM offered to help him trap the groundhog= 3. Ronald Ramsey, 6635 Poage Valley Road Ext spoke about the Conrail Carve-Up and the possibility of job loss for NS employees He requested that the Board write a letter to Linda Morgan, Chairman of the Surtace Transportation Board opposing the Conrail Carve-up. O. REPORTS BLJ MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE AFTER DISCUSSION OF ITEMS -UW 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Accounts Paid -August 1997 P. WORK SESSION 1. South County District Park Master Plan PRESENTED BY PETE HAISLIP, P&R ADVISORY COMMISSION AND CITIZENS PLANNING COMMITTEE. PH OFFERED TWO OPTIONS: PLAN A WHICH IS DESIGNED USING ALL THE AVAILABLE PROPERTY AND PLAN B WHICH WOULD INCLUDE BOTH A SCHOOL SPORTS COMPLEX AND PARK LAND THE RECOMMENDATIONS INCLUDED• TRANSFER $216,000 FROM THE 1992 BOND FUNDS; APPROPRIATE $20,000 FOR DESIGN OF PHASE I, APPLY FOR VDOT PARK ACCESS FUNDS, PROVIDE $100,000 IN THE 1998- 99 CIP, AND ACQUIRE THE 11 ACRE SCHOOL BOARD TRACT. BOARD CONSENSUS TO MOVEFORWARD. STAFF TO BRING BACK REQUESTS T 10/14/97 MEETING. Q. EXECUTIVE SESSION PURSUANT TO THE CODE OF VIRGINIA SECTION 2.1-344 A (3) disposition of publicly held property; 2.1- 344 A (5) discussion of a prospective business or industry where there has been no previous announcement; 2.1-344 A (1) discussion of a personnel matter; 2-1-344 (A) (3) acquisition of private property for public purposes. BLJ MOTION TO GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION FOLLOWING WORK SESSION AT 4:45 P.M. URC WITH HCN ABSENT EVENING SESSION (7:00 P.M.) R. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION R-092397-8 10 BLJ MOTION TO RETURN TO OPEN SESSION AT 6.42 P M AND ADOPT CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION URC WITH HCN ABSENT S. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Second reading of ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to construct a communications tower, located at 6332 Franklin Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Michael Pruden for CFW Wireless. (Terry Harrington, Planning & Zoning Director) (CONTINUED FROM AUGUST 19, 199 3 CITIZENS SPOKE FM MOTION TO DEVELOP POLICY AND GUIDELINES BLJ RULED MOTION OUT OF ORDER FM MOTION TO CONTINUE. 90 DAYS -DEFEATED AYES-FM NAYS-LBE,FFH~BLJ ABSENT-HCN 0-092397-9 FM MOTION TO APPROVE REQUEST AT THE LOWEST ALTITUDE (152 FEET) ACCEPTABLE TO CFW AND APPLICANT MUST COME BACK TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FOR ANY HIGHER LEVELS. URC WITH HCN ABSENT FM MOTION TO ESTABLISH COMMITTEE TO DEVELOP GUIDELINES AND POLICIES IN REGARD TO THE PLACING OF WIRELES S COMMUNICATION TOWERS. COMMITTEE TO INCLU DE: CO UNTY STAFF, ONE CITIZEN FROM EACH DISTRICT, APPOINTED BY SUPERVISOR, TWO REPRESENTATIVES FROM WIRELESS COMM UNICATI ON INDUS TRY REGIONAL REPRESENTATIVES FROM ROAN OKE CIT Y, SALEM, VI NTON URC WITH HCN ABSENT 2. Second reading of ordinance amending and reenacting Sections 5-21 and 5-24 of Article II, Dogs, Cats and other Animals, of Chapter 5, Animals and Fowls, of the Roanoke County Code to permit the keeping of as many as three 1i dogs in a dwelling unit and Section 30-29-2, Residential Use Types (private Kennel) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. (Terry Harrington, Planning 8~ Zoning Director) 10 CITIZENS SPOKE LBE MOTION TO APPROVE ORD. INCREASING TO 3 DOGS AYES-LBE NAYS-FM, FFH~BLJ ABSENT-HCN BLJ MOTION TO GRANT A PERI OD OF AMNESTY FOR CITIZENS WHO CUR RENTLY HAVE UP TO 3 DOG S WHOSE DOGS ARE REGISTERED BY JAN 1998. THE ORDINANCE W OULD REMAIN AT 2 DOGS AND ONLY THO SE WHO REGISTER THEIR DO GS BY JAN 1988 C OULD HAVE 3. RC WITH HCN ABSENT CHANGES TO ORDINANCE WILL BE BROUGHT BACK TO 10/14/97 JUIEETING FOR ADOPTION. 3. Second reading of ordinance to rezone approximately 0.33 acres from C-1 to C-2 in order to operate a pet business, located at 3534 Brambleton Avenue, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Alex and Betty Nelson. (Terry Harrington, Planning ~ Zoning Director) 0-092397-10 FM MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC WITH HCN ABSENT 4. Second reading of ordinance to rezone 1.01 acres from C- 2C to C-2 in order to construct a parking lot located behind Carilion Family Medicine on Brambleton Avenue, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the petition of Carilion Health Corporation, Inc. (Terry Harrington, Planning & Zoning Director) 0-092397-11 FM MOTION TO ADOPT ORD WITH CONDITION #1 REMOVED URC WITH HCN ABSENT 5. Second reading of ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to expand the existing facility, located at 1928 Loch 12 Haven Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Valley Word Ministries. (Terry Harrington, Planning & Zoning Director) 0-092397-12 FFH MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC WITH HCN ABSENT 6. Second reading of ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to allow summer concerts, located in Valleypointe, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of the Easter Seal Society of VA, Inc. (Terry Harrington, Planning & Zoning Director) 0-092397-13 BLJ MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC WITH HCN ABSENT - 7. Second reading of ordinance to rezone 0.65 acre from R-1 to C-2 to allow a minor auto repair facility, located 130 feet northwest of the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northridge Lane, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Marc I. Wilson. (Terry Harrington, Planning & Zoning Director) 0-092397-14 FFH MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC WITH HCN ABSENT 8. Second reading of ordinance to rezone approximately 22.01 acres from AG-3 and R-1 to R-1 to develop single family residences, located at the intersection of Finney Drive and Elizabeth Drive, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of F. W. Finney Construction Corporation. (Terry Harrington, Planning & Zoning Director) 0-092397-15 BLJ MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC WITH HCN ABSENT 2 CITIZENS SPOKE 9. Second reading of ordinance to rezone 9.77 acres 13 from R-1 Conditional to R-1 to construct single family residences, located at the south side of Woodhaven Road, approximately 0.5 mile east of its intersection with Green Ridge Road, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Ernest Clark. (Terry Harrington, Planning & Zoning Director) CONTINUED TO 10/28/97 AT REQUEST OF PETITIONER U. CITIZEN COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS Sara Martinez 5860 Brahma Road, expressed concern about the destruction of neighborhoods, the overcrowding at some schools and the need to protect the mountain viewsheds V. ADJOURNMENT BLJ ADJOURNED MEETING AT 9.20 P M 14 O~ ROANp~.~ ~ ~ p Z a2 1838 C~~ixx~#~ ~~ ~.o~txt~C~e ~' ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA September 23, 1997 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. Individuals with disabilities who arrangement in order to participate meetings or other programs and County, please contact the Clerk to request that you provide at least arran ements ma be made. 9 _ y - --__ _ __ require assistance or special in or attend Board of Supervisors activities sponsored by Roanoke the Board at (540) 772-2005. We 48-hours notice so that proper A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: The Reverend Steven W. Harris Baptist Children's Home 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS D. BRIEFINGS ® Recycled Paper NEW BUSINESS 1. Request to appropriate funds to reimburse Botetourt County for prior year revenues collected in Jack Smith Industrial Park. (Diane Hyatt, Finance Director) 2. Request from Schools for an advance of $50,000 for start up cost for Phase I of the School Capital Construction. (Martin L. Robison, Assistant School Superintendent) 3. Request for approval of expenditures from Public-Private Partnership Funds on behalf of PD Lodging Associates (Brian Duncan, Assistant Economic Development Director) F. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA 1. First reading of ordinance to rezone 0.99 acre from R-1 to C-1 located on Valley Forge Avenue 100 feet south of the intersection of Valley Forge Avenue and Concord Place, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Maynard Manning. 2. First reading of ordinance to conditionally rezone 5 acres from R-3 to C-2 and obtain a Special Use Permit to bring a nonconforming use into conformity, located at 5300 Hawthorne Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Shenandoah Homes. 3. First reading of ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit to expand the existing restaurant with drive-thru window, located at 4369 Electric Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Wendy's of Western VA. 4. First reading of ordinance to amend conditions on 1.14 acres zoned C-2C to construct office buildings, located at 5440 Peters Creek Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Radford & Co. 2 5. First reading of ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit to construct a regional stormwater management basin (utility services, major) and for a Section 15.1-456 review for consistency with the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan, located 400 feet northwest of the intersection of Ambassador Drive and Envoy Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of the City of Roanoke (Montclair). 6. First reading of ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit to construct a regional stormwater management basin (utility services, major) and for a Section 15.1-456 review for consistency with the Roanoke County Comprehensive Pian, located 300 feet southeast of the terminus of Candlelight Circle, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of the City of Roanoke (North Lakes). 7. First reading of ordinance to rezone 2.044 acres from C-2 conditional to C-2 to construct an office building, located at 3743 Challenger Avenue, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Jack F. Walrond, Jr. 8. First reading of ordinance to rezone approximately 22 acres from R-1, R-3, and C-2C to C-2 in order to construct a retail store located on Route 220 and Vailey Avenue, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Lowe's Co. Inc. 9. First reading of ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit to construct a 190 foot self-supporting broadcast tower, located at 5585 Catawba Hospital Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Ohio State Cellular Phone Co., Inc. G. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. First reading of an ordinance authorizing the construction of and financing for a Local Public Works Improvement Project - Brushy Mountain Water Project. (Gary Robertson, Utility Director) 3 2. First reading of ordinance authorizing the donation of lease of office space in the Roanoke County Administration Center to the Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) H. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Second reading of ordinance authorizing the vacation of a portion of an existing 20 foot sanitary sewer easement across Lot 4, Block 4, Section 2 of Hollins Gardens. (Gary Robertson, Utility Director) 2. Second reading of ordinance to grant the right to use a County water line easement for private sanitary sewer service by Cicero H. Hall, Jr. and Doris B. Hall. (Gary Robertson, Utility Director) I. APPOINTMENTS 1. Fire Code Board of Appeals 2. Grievance Panel 3. Hanging Rock Battleground and Rail Preservation Foundation. 4. Industrial Development Authority 5. The Roanoke County Commission for Senior and Challenged Citizens. J. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 4 1. Approval of Minutes -August 19, 1997 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Grievance Panel and the Commission for Senior and Challenged Citizens. 3. Request for acceptance of Hollins Court Circle Into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 4. Resolution of appreciation upon the retirement of George H. Altice, Jr., General Services Department. 5. Donation of 15 foot drainage easement on property owned by Brian M. 8~ Ellen Hancock to the Board of Supervisors. 6. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Lllies of the Gardens, Section 3. K. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS L. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS M. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS N. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS O. REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Accounts Paid -August 1997 P. WORK SESSION 1. South County District Park Master Plan 5 Q. EXECUTIVE SESSION PURSUANT TO THE CODE OF VIRGINIA SECTION 2.1-344 A (3) disposition of publicly held property; 2.1- 344 A (5) discussion of a prospective business or industry where there has been no previous announcement; 2.1-344 A (1) discussion of a personnel matter. EVENING SESSION (7:00 P.M.1 R. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION S. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Second reading of ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to construct a communications tower, located at 6332 Franklin Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Michael Pruden for CFW Wireless. (Terry Harrington, Planning & Zoning Director) (CONTINUED FROM AUGUST 19, 1997) 2. Second reading of ordinance amending and reenacting Sections 5-21 and 5-24 of Article II, Dogs, Cats and other Animals, of Chapter 5, Animals and Fowls, of the Roanoke County Code to permit the keeping of as many as three dogs in a dwelling unit and Section 30-29-2, Residential Use Types (private Kennel) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. (Terry Harrington, Planning & Zoning Director) 3. Second reading of ordinance to rezone approximately 0.33 acres from C-1 to C-2 in order to operate a pet business, located at 3534 Brambleton Avenue, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Alex and Betty Nelson. (Terry Harrington, Planning & Zoning Director) 4. Second reading of ordinance to rezone 1.01 acres from C- 2C to C-2 in order to construct a parking lot located behind Carilion Family Medicine on Brambleton Avenue, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the petition of Carilion Health Corporation, Inc. (Terry Harrington, 6 Planning & Zoning Director) 5. Second reading of ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to expand the existing facility, located at 1928 Loch Haven Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Valley Word Ministries. (Terry Harrington, Planning & Zoning Director) 6. Second reading of ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to allow summer concerts, located 1n Valleypointe, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of the Easter Seai Society of VA, Inc. (Terry Harrington, Planning & Zoning Director) 7. Second reading of ordinance to rezone 0.65 acre from R-1 to C-2 to allow a minor auto repair facility, located 130 feet northwest of the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northridge Lane, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Marc I. Wilson. (Terry Harrington, Planning & Zoning Director) 8. Second reading of ordinance to rezone approximately 22.01 acres from AG-3 and R-1 to R-1 to develop single family residences, located at the intersection of Finney Drive and Elizabeth Drive, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of F. W. Finney Construction Corporation. (Terry Harrington, Planning & Zoning Director) 9. Second reading of ordinance to rezone 9.77 acres from R- 1 Conditional to R-1 to construct single family residences, located at the south side of Woodhaven Road, approximately 0.5 mile east of its intersection with Green Ridge Road, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Ernest Clark. (Terry Harrington, Planning ~ Zoning Director) U. CITIZEN COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS V. ADJOURNMENT -- ~-/ AT A REGIILAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANORE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 1997 RESOLUTION 492397-1 OF CONGRATULATIONS TO KPMG PEAT MARWICR LLP ON THEIR 100TH ANNIVERSARY AND IN RECOGNITION OF THEIR CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE ROANORE VALLEY WHEREAS, KPMG has over 800 offices in 125 countries with 76,000 professionals providing accounting, auditing and consulting services, and WHEREAS, KPMG Peat Marwick LLP has 135 offices throughout the United States, including, for over 25 years, an office in the Roanoke Valley with approximately 40 professionals serving over 35 businesses, agencies and governmental organizations, and WHEREAS, KPMG Peat Marwick LLP personnel have served as volunteers in the community for charitable and civic organizations including the YMCA, Junior Achievement, Roanoke Jaycees, Literacy Volunteers, Kiwanis, Rotary and other agencies; and have provided financial support to organizations such as the United Way, Explore Park, Center in the Square, and the New Century Council; and WHEREAS, on September 22, 1997, in recognition of their 100th anniversary, KPMG Peat Marwick LLP closed all their offices in the United States, and their 20,000 partners and employees performed various community services in their localities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, offers its sincere congratulations to KPMG Peat Markwick LLP upon the occasion of its 100th anniversary; FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors expresses its deepest appreciation to the employees of KPMG Peat Markwick LLP, especially those in the Roanoke Office, for honoring this important milestone in such a caring and sharing manner by volunteering their services 1 to the citizens and organizations of the Roanoke Valley. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: ~• ~~C,./ Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board cc: File Resolutions of Congratulations File 2 C- ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 1997 RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS TO KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP ON THEIR 100TH ANNIVERSARY AND IN RECOGNITION OF THEIR CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE ROANOKE VALLEY WHEREAS, KPMG has over 800 offices in 125 countries with 76,000 professionals providing accounting, auditing and consulting services, and WHEREAS, KPMG Peat Marwick LLP has 135 offices throughout the United States, including, for over 25 years, an office in the Roanoke Valley with approximately 40 professionals serving over 35 businesses, agencies and governmental organizations, and WHEREAS, KPMG Peat Marwick LLP personnel have served as volunteers in the community for charitable and civic organizations including the YMCA, Junior Achievement, Roanoke Jaycees, Literacy Volunteers, Kiwanis, Rotary and other agencies; and have provided financial support to organizations such as the United Way, Explore Park, Center in the Square, and the New Century Council; and WHEREAS, on September 22, 1997, in recognition of their 100th anniversary, KPMG Peat Marwick LLP closed all their offices in the United States, and their 20,000 partners and employees performed various community services in their localities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, offers its sincere congratulations to KPMG Peat Markwick LLP upon the occasion of its 100th anniversary; FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors expresses its deepest appreciation to the employees of KPMG Peat Markwick LLP, especially those in the Roanoke Office, for honoring this important milestone in such a caring and sharing manner by volunteering their services to the citizens and organizations of the Roanoke Valley. • .- ~ A- 092397-2 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~ / AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 23, 1997 AGENDA ITEM: Appropriation of Revenue Sharing Fund to Botetourt County COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~' a~ l~z~,'~'~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: On August 25, 1988 Roanoke County and Botetourt County signed a revenue sharing agreement for revenues generated from a joint industrial development park located partly in Botetourt County and partly in Roanoke County. The agreement stipulates that the two counties will share equally in local real estate, personal property, machinery and tools, business license and any other taxes collected on the businesses located in this industrial park. Over the years Roanoke County's Commissioner of Revenue Department has remitted to Botetourt County their portion of personal property, machinery and tools, and business license tax. However, the portion owed on the real estate tax was not remitted to Botetourt County. In addition, Botetourt County has collected tax on businesses located on the Botetourt County side of the industrial park that have not been remitted to Roanoke County. Attached is an analysis of the real estate taxes that are owed to Botetourt County less the taxes that are owed from Botetourt County to Roanoke County. These net to a payment due Botetourt County of $158,280.86. FISCAL IMPACT: Because these taxes were collected in prior fiscal years and recorded as revenue for the County of Roanoke, it is now necessary to appropriate $158,280.86 from the unappropriated balance in order to make this payment to Botetourt County. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends appropriated $158,280.86 from the unappropriated balance and to pay Botetourt County the past revenue sharing funds that are owed. In the future this analysis will be done as part of the year end closing procedures. M:\FINANCE\COMMON\BOARD\9-23-97.WPDM:\FINANCE\COMMON\BOARD\9-23-97.WPD September 17, 1997 E-~ SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Supervisor Johnson No Yes Absent Denied ( ) to appropriate the funds Eddy ~_ Received ( ) Harrison ~_ Referred ( ) Johnson ~ To ( ) Minnix x Nickens _~ cc: File Diane Hyatt, Finance Director Tim Gubala, Economic Development Director • M:\FINANCE\COMMON\BOARD\9-23-97.WPDM:\FINANCE\COMMON\BOARD\9-23-97.WPD September 17, 1997 ~~ i Taxes Assessed By Roanoke County -Jack Smith Industrial Park Parcel 40.01-1-17.1,2 Real Estate: Year Owner Assessment Taxes 1990 Tweeds, Inc. 435,000 $ 5,002.50 1991 Tweeds, Inc. 5,776,700 65,276.71 1992 Tweeds, Inc. 5,937,700 67,096.01 1993 Tweeds, Inc. 5,915,000 66,839.50 1994 Tweeds, Inc. 5,925,100 66,953.63 1995 Blue Ridge Associates 6,017,600 67,998.88 1996 Blue Ridge Associates 5,331,000 60,240.30 Total Taxes Assessed By Roanoke County 399,407.53 Taxes Assessed by Botetourt County -Jack Smith Industrial Park Real Estate: 1990 DVW 1991 DVW, McCormack 1992 DVW, McCormack 1993 DVW, McCormack 1994 DVW, McCormack 1995 DVW, McCormack 1996 DVW, McCormack, Kegley Business License: 1992 Security Transport and Delivery 1993 Security Transport and Delivery 1994 Security Transport and Delivery 1995 Security Transport and Delivery 1996 Security Transport and Delivery 30,200 226.50 198,800 1,491.00 204, 500 1, 533.75 291, 500 2,186.25 291,500 2,186.25 291,500 2,186.25 504,500 3,783.75 13,593.75 1,337.84 1,643.99 1,853.54 2,369.59 2,499.89 Personal Property: 1992 Security Transport and Delivery 1993 Security Transport and Delivery 1994 Security Transport and Delivery 1995 Security Transport and Delivery 1996 Security Transport and Delivery 9,704.85 4,092.68 4,450.63 5,423.08 6,848.68 6,093.79 26,908.86 Total Taxes Assessed By Botetourt County Amount Due Botetourt County Total Assessed by Roanoke County Total Assessed by Botetourt County Difference Difference divided by two: Less payment made on~June 27, 1991 Amount Due: 50,207.46 399,407.53 (50,207.46) 349,200.07 174,600.04 (16,319.18) $ 158,280.86 ~ . - ~ - .Z AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADNIINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 1997 RESOLUTION 092397-3 TO ADVANCE FUNDS FOR CERTAIN EXPENDITURES MADE AND/OR TO BE MADE IN CONNECTION WITH THE ACQUISITION, RENOVATION, CONSTRUCTION AND EQUIPPING OF CERTAIN CAPITAL IlVIPROVEMENTS FOR SCHOOL PROJECTS WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "County Board") adopted a resolution on August 19, 1997 declaring its intention to reimburse itself from the proceeds of one or more tax-exempt financings for certain expenditures made and/or to be made in connection with the acquisition, renovation, construction and equipping of certain capital improvements for school projects, and WHEREAS, the School Board (the "School Board") of the County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "County") adopted a resolution on August 28, 1997 declaring its intention to reimburse itself from the proceeds of one or more tax-exempt financings for certain expenditures made and/or to be made in connection with the acquisition, renovation, construction and equipping of certain capital improvements for school projects, and WHEREAS, The School Board has requested an advance of $ 50,000 for environmental assessments, advertising costs for architects and engineers, core drillings, and other costs related to the acquisition of land in South County, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the County Board will advance the sum of $50,000 to the School Board for environmental assessments, advertising costs for architects and engineers, core drillings, and other costs related to the acquisition of land in South County. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Hamson, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board cc: File Diane Hyatt, Finance Director Brent Robertson, Budget Manager Dr. Deanna Gordon, School Superintendent Brenda Chastain, Clerk to the School Board Martin Robison, Assistant School Superintendent 2 '.fA' r ACTION NO ITEM NUMBER ~ °~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 23, 1997 AGENDA ITEM: CIP resolution request for $50,000 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: The acquisition of land in South County for a proposed new high school involves environmental assessments, advertising costs for architects and engineers, core drillings, and other related costs. The Roanoke County School Board adopted the attached resolution on September 11, 1997 requesting an advance of $50,000 to cover the costs associated with purchase of land. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Blue Ribbon Committee Report was accepted by the Roanoke County School Board on March 27, 1997, and subsequently approved by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. Included in the Phase 1 recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Committee Report was the acquisition of land for a new South County high school. FISCAL IMPACT: This is a request for an advance from the Board of Supervisors in anticipation of a future bond issue for Phase 1 of the Blue Ribbon Committee projects. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the attached resolution to advance the Roanoke County School Board the sum of $50,000 for costs related ~-a to the acquisition of land in South County. Martin L. Robison Assistant Superintendent ACTION Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Approved () Motion by: Eddy Denied () Johnson Received () Harrison Referred () Minnix To () Nickens c: File Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Dr. Deanna Gordon, School Superintendent Martin L. Robison, Assistant Superintendent Brenda S. Chastain, School Board Clerk VOTE No Yes Abs ~+ FROM THE MINUTES OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, MEETING IN REGULAR SESSION ON SEPTEMBER 11, 1997 IN THE BOARD ROOM OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE: RESOLUTION OF THE SCHOOL BOARD OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA REQUESTING AN ADVANCE OF FUNDS FOR CERTAIN EXPENDITURES MADE AND/OR TO BE MADE IN CONNECTION WITH THE ACQUISITION, RENOVATION, CONSTRUCTION AND EQUIPPING OF CERTAIN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FOR SCHOOL PROJECTS WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "County Board") adopted a resolution on August 9, 1997 declaring its intention to reimburse itself from the proceeds of one or more tax-exempt financings for certain expenditures made and/or to be made in connection with the acquisition, renovation, construction and equipping of certain capital improvements for school projects, and WHEREAS, the School Board (the "School Board") of the County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "County") adopted a resolution on August 28, 1997 declaring its intention to reimburse itself from the proceeds of one or more tax-exempt financings for certain expenditures made and/or to be made in connection with the acquisition, renovation, construction and equipping of certain capital improvements for school projects, and WHEREAS, the School Board now desires to acquire land in South County. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the School Board requests the County Board to advance the sum of $50,000 for environmental studies, advertising for architects and engineers, and related acquisition costs of land in South County. Adopted this 11th day of September 1997, and on the following vote: AYES: Jerry L. Canada, Thomas A. Leggette, Marion G. Roark, William A. Irvin, II and Michael W. Stovall NAYS: None ABSENT: None TESTE: ~ ~ C~"C~~~i1J ,Clerk, Roanoke County School Board Lam- RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA TO ADVANCE FUNDS FOR CERTAIN EXPENDITURES MADE AND/OR TO BE MADE IN CONNECTION WITH THE ACQUISITION, RENOVATION, CONSTRUCTION AND EQUIPPING OF CERTAIN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FOR SCHOOL PROJECTS WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "County Board") adopted a resolution on August 19, 1997 declaring its intention to reimburse itself from the proceeds of one or more tax-exempt financings for certain expenditures made and/or to be made in connection with the acquisition, renovation, construction and equipping of certain capital improvements for school projects, and WHEREAS, the School Board (the "School Board") of the County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "County") adopted a resolution on August 28, 1997 declaring its intention to reimburse itself from the proceeds of one or more tax-exempt financings for certain expenditures made and/or to be made in connection with the acquisition, renovation, construction and equipping of certain capital improvements for school projects, and WHEREAS, the School Board now desires to (describe purchase desired), and WHEREAS, The School Board has requested an advance of $ 50,000 for environmental assessments, advertising costs for architects and engineers, core drillings, and other costs related to the acquisition of land in South County, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the County Board will advance the sum of $50,000 to the School Board for environmental assessments, advertising costs for architects and engineers, core drillings, and other costs related to the acquisition of land in South County. M:\FINANCE\COMMON\BOARD\8-19-97D.RES September 17, 1997 -G~ RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA TO ADVANCE FUNDS FOR CERTAIN EXPENDITURES MADE AND/OR TO BE MADE IN CONNECTION WITH THE ACQUISITION, RENOVATION, CONSTRUCTION AND EQUIPPING OF CERTAIN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FOR SCHOOL PROJECTS WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "County Board") adopted a resolution on August 19, 1997 declaring its intention to reimburse itself from the proceeds of one or more tax-exempt financings for certain expenditures made and/or to be made in connection with the acquisition, renovation, construction and equipping of certain capital improvements for school projects, and WHEREAS, the School Board (the "School Board") of the County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "County") adopted a resolution on August 28, 1997 declaring its intention to reimburse itself from the proceeds of one or more tax-exempt financings for certain expenditures made and/or to be made in connection with the acquisition, renovation, construction and equipping of certain capital improvements for school projects, and WHEREAS, the School Board now desires to acquire land in South County, and WHEREAS, The School Board has requested an advance of $ 50,000 for environmental assessments, advertising costs for architects and engineers, core drillings, and other costs related to the acquisition of land in South County, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the County Board will advance the sum of $50,000 to the School Board for environmental assessments, advertising costs for architects and engineers, core drillings, and other costs related to the acquisition of land in South County. M:\FINANCE\COMMON\BOARD\8-19-97D.RES September 22, 1997 A-092397-4 Item No. LC-3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: September 23, 1997 AGENDA ITEM: Request for approval of expenditures from Public-Private Partnership Funds on behalf of PD Lodging Associates COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This is a request to expend $78,148 for public purposes on behalf of the location of a new motel (Hampton Inn) on Plantation Road in the Hollins Magisterial District. BACKGROUND: PD Lodging Associates has worked with staff to determine an appropriate location of a new motel (Hampton Inn) in Roanoke County. A suitable site has been located on the west side of Plantation Road .3 of a mile from I-81. The authorization of the expenditure of Public- Private Partnership funds is a contributing factor in this location and will assist PA Lodging Associates by funding $74,148 which is 50% of the $156,296 connection fee for water, sanitary sewer and fire service. In return, PA Lodging Associates will construct athree- story, 60-room motel with an indoor swimming pool, fitness center and meeting rooms. Estimated total investment for this project is $3,465,000. Total projected annual revenue subject to transient occupancy tax is estimated to be $1,100,475. Estimated annual taxes generated from all sources have been calculated at $87,717. Staff reviewed the request for assistance and found that it meets the Public-Private Partnership Policy criteria with an estimated return of taxes paid back within the first yeaz. .' 3 Funds in the amount of $74,148 are available within the Economic Development Public- Private Partnership fund for this project. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve the expenditure of $74,148 of Public-Private Partnership funds on behalf of PD Lodging Associates, Inc. 2. Do not fund the request. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve alternative no. 1. Respectfully submitted: -----~-- Timothy W. Gubala, Director Department of Economic Development ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Supervisor Johnson No Yes Denied ( ) to approve $74.,248 in public- Eddy ~ Received ( ) private partnership funds Harrison ~ Referred ( ) _ Johnson ~ To ( ) _ Minnix ~- - Nickens Approved: Elme C. Hodge County Administrator Absent cc: File Diane Hyatt, Finance Director Brian Duncan, Assistant Eccnomic !Development Director ACTION N0. ITEM NO. ~~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINI//~1, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 23, 1997 AGENDA ITEM: Requests for Public Hearing and First Reading for Rezoning Ordinances Consent Agenda COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: The first reading on these ordinances is accomplished by adoption of these ordinances in the manner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions, rather approval satisfies the procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public hearing and second reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public hearing on these ordinances is scheduled for October 28, 1997. The titles of these ordinances are as follows: 1) An ordinance to rezone .099 acre from R-1 to C-1 located on Valley Forge Avenue 100 feet south of the intersection of Valley Forge Avenue and Concord Place, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Maynard Manning. 2) An ordinance to conditionally rezone 5 acres from R-3 to C-2 and obtain a Special Use Permit to bring a nonconforming use into conformity, located at 5300 Hawthorne Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Shenandoah Homes. 3) An ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit to expand the existing restaurant with drive-thru window, located at 4369 Electric Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Wendy's of Western VA. 4) An ordinance to amend conditions on 1.14 acres zoned C-2C to construct office buildings, located at 5440 Peters Creek Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Radford & Co. Fi- ~ 5) An ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit to construct a regional stormwater management basin (utility services, major) and for a Section 15.1-456 review for consistency with the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan, located 400 feet northwest of the intersection of Ambassador Drive and Envoy Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of the City of Roanoke (Montclair). 6) An ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit to construct a regional stormwater management basin (utility services, major) and for a Section 15.1-456 review for consistency with the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan, located 300 feet southeast of the terminus of Candlelight Circle, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of the City of Roanoke (North Lakes). 7) An ordinance to rezone 2.044 acres from C-2 conditional to C-2 to construct an office building, located at 3743 Challenger Avenue, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Jack F. Walrond Jr. 8) An ordinance to rezone approximately 22 acres from R-1, R-3, C-2C to C-2 in order to construct a retail store, located on Route 220 and Valley Avenue, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Lowe's Co. Inc. 9) An ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit to construct a 190 foot self-supporting broadcast tower, located at 5585 Catawba Hospital Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Ohio State Cellular Phone Co. Inc. MAPS ARE ATTACHED; MORE DETAILED INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE IN THE CLERK'S OFFICE. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: (1) That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of these rezoning ordinances for the purpose of scheduling the second reading and public hearing for October 28, 1997. (2) That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth as Items 1 through 9, inclusive, and that the Clerk is authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action. Respectfully submitted, Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Action Motion by Eddy Harrison Johnson Minnix Nickens No Yes Abs ~~ ~-~, ~I ~g jy~ g_ For staff use only 'wW~ s~f4~~i~-- COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 5204 Bernard t~r.~ _ P.O. Sox 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 ( 540 772-2068 F:.X (540) 772-2108 i ' Ch ck type of application filed (check all that apply): ~REZON-NG ^ SPECIAL USE_ ^VARIANCE Applicant's name: Maynard 0. Manning Phone: 774-0721 Address: 3317 Valley Forge Ave. Zip Code: 24018 Roanoke,Vir inia Owner's name: Maynard 0. Manning ~ Phone: 774-0721 Address: 3317 Valley Forge Ave. Zip Code: 24018 Location of property: Tax Map Number: ~-~, t Mount Vernon Hgts. Lot 2 Sec.8 < Valley Forge Ave. ~`~iagisterial District: ~ SPA v~ \ },;~~~-~ Community Planning Area: ti, ~~~.~ ~ ~ ~ Size of parcel (s}: Existing Zoning: ~2-~ ' 0.099 acres Existing Land Use: ~(~~-~ 4, 340 sq.ft. date rece'ved:' rec 'ved by: ap licaiion fed: -t7. = PCiEZA date: oc ~ ? l9`i placards issued: •c 8 f 91 BOS dare: O c-F 28 IcjR Case Number: ~' Proposed Zoning: C Proposed Land Use: ~V K,Vct~,~} ~..,~`~~ 5 I ~~ For Staff Use Criy Use Type: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES _ NO / IF NO, A VA'Ir-.NCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. ~ Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for ;-__ requested Use Type? YES ~.~ NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being prc;;=-_~ with this request? YES NO Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance ir. cr~~r to: Is the application complete? Please check if e.^.c`.csed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF F,~~'Y OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR.INCOMPLETE. ws v ws v ws v ~g Consultation 8 1 /2" x 1 i " concept plan Application fee' ~"~ Nletes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable Application ~..:•. Justification ~; 'Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners ., l hereby certify that / am either the ov~~ner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchases and am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner.. Owner's Signature: ~Gz~ti~' ~ ~~~ ~ ~/' For SIaH Use On/y: Case Number Applicant Maynard 0 Manning-- The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the folle~::ing questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the. Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the ,purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. After VDOT take in 1994 new street on Valley Forge Ave. and Concord Place. Tax Map 77.13-3-52 R-1 doesn,t meet tY',e requirments for R-1 dwelling. I request this lot 52-R1 be rezoned to C-1, joining my C-1 tax lots 77.13-3-53 and 77.13-3-54. And joining Lawrence Johnson tax lots 55 and 56. Please explain how the project conforms to the gen=_raI guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the rroperty itself, the adjoining properies, and the sur;cunding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. None ~' ~~ REFERENCED MAP: VDOT PROJ NO 1602-080-248 C-501 tJ~J a h~ ~'~/ ~~ ~P ~~ ,moo ~ /~ 40'x25' DWEWNG 30• ~j~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ' SE~ACK ~~` / \ ~~ti / i ~/ _-' -~ ~ 0 ' ~ 11g 43~ N~~•Zp E LOT 52 TAX MAP 5836735 ROAD CL CURVE DATA D=44' T=50.29' szzE L=95.98' 0.099 ACRES R=130.22' 4,390 s.F. PC 11+12.58 PI 11+62.87 PT 12+08.56 E H G I V E E R S, P. C. ~a r.ve.r ~.. ao...r. Syr. ~aaa wo-~~am. •u ~~x Mr. Manning s"~T Lot Size Investigation Roanoke County Virginia C - '~ DESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED DATE PROJECT - RNP 7-31-97 of - sHEfTs ' ~•. ~ r, roles., iii I I ( S~ ~' l• \~ ~ C ~. ~ r f /, ~ R '' ~ I ~ I I I 2~~ Exist. R'14"~ '~` iii I I ~.JV ••~0 1~~ ~d a /. /rGf7~ I .ICI I I _ .~ ' ~~ n i. ,! ~!//. 4' ``!ICI ! I `- -O• ~~`t F.L. llDd. `' yI ~~ I ....~~G. CO. N N . , T~ ~ ~ • :~ ~ ~-- 4.~- W W ° }_ ~ sr~;. ion i~~.~a ~~~~ ~ •• •` -f ~ ~\ ,,,.. .-~ ~ Co:7n. Rr~. is2J ~~,IHYI~I~,RD 0. NI n ,~ ~• .•\ ~~- ~~ ~~.~ - S o. 9~. 7 `'' ' C .. r ~ '-~ I `-::i j l 1 1 l~ ' I I G ~ O ~ a" W UX Ln v\\ .- _ v . .. ~~ . .' ~/~ ; a ~-73.53 c' ~ ~ ~ • . :~-.: ".. • ~~ ~. ,,~, j ~l iiri~.J~ `~~ ~~~ c ~~ v , ~~ c ~ ~T ,:, u~~, ~ •'~` ; ° ~. \ ' • ;\ ~' ~ Sur. ~~ I.JnS ~. a _o r r' ~~ o ~. \ \ ::.~~% _ '~. i Bonn. Z~;e. !520 Corr. J;z.,;Zp ,. ~ KIWI ~ ~ ~ '~ \ I ~ }, ~ i `7' ,+- - I 'JI !I-C ~.VI /•I I.~V J.v~ S ~ ~`,' v~ i. I / ~ I ~ / I •~ ply ~~ ~ I --.-! _ ~ i ;~~~/ ~ -',~~~''/ ~ o ~',•='o,-ox. _2 /-~`,. 1. • . . '~ T Z~ ~ % Gr°'de I ' ~, I I ion Block ~ w/e s@9 ~• h'a~k ~ ^~ ' a ~ Exist. R/ W ~=~ , . 1 .1 ~ ~` .. Ip .. , sd Exisf. R~'N ~~ '~ ~ ~ ~ ,~~ ~o~t ~'Aspn~c+ ~ /S58'oo' W i~ i 5 32,00 ~ ~ • , ~,, dines ` ~ -'- Gn t. ~ A F C ~ Z7 ~~+.51 I.P ~ 008 '=' e1d9. 5~ +o0 3~1 .Q; ~ ~ ~ e~' ~. X ~~ ~N~M't~i~• 3'1 ~ ~ ~ ~,a '~'~~ Lot- 7 ~,~D° 5g w v' °'I -+ ~ ''^~yti ly COnC , ~ Cat J ~"J' ~ ~ ~ li! k Q C w ~ ~ ~ 2s' X90 ° ~ ~ ~ LUCAa~ ar ~, ~o ~ a -Q~. ~ 3 ~ ~~ I a FREDERICK ~',, ;~ A~~ ~5~5 ~ ~, ~'o ; ~ ~ ~ ~' ~i~1ARY C. LUvti DD o - ~ -~ ~' ~ J uJY Anchor ~ ~ ; a~ ~ i.P. ` ~ I ~ ~ Lots z' 3' ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~,~ ~ c~ ed ~ I ~ ~ ~CS ~~~ ~ O o ~ e ~ ,~ ' v10UNT UERNON HEIGHTS 51ock q ~ ~, ~~ ~~ ` q ~ ~ P B Z P X07 O LARRY r~. ~AIVI PEx ... O ~ IZ ' Dou wood ~.: j ~ ~ I ^~ ~ ~, -J C ~;~MES R. SNIVEL ~~~ ~. ~y,,~z ~ ~z9 ~~n r,: '~i2„ R.~MOVED ~~~~. ~' T 7 g. 2 4'%" ~~ ~ - va~ ~~; 8 0 ,,~ \~ ~ 'Q r i5' ;vlaple `~,~~ ~,~~ F ANN NWR i L 3ASHL0;= ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. e. i~ gigg. io~~ w, ~ Lots q ~ i0 ~ T.M. 1128. 8; 12" Oak ~ F.L. /128. 53 ZO" Oak ._f ,_ 15" Oak 12" Oak ~ ' /WI ~~\~\ :N D CONN. RTE. 1520 STA. 12+50.00 Hatched areas denote areas See Sheet No.3B For Draino ,9 +-vr lv A~ O~ "ice e_ O~ ~~OANp,Y~ .a w ~~ ~~ Z v - a 1838 ~~~~~ ~~ .IY~~~".~Z.Q UTILITY DEPARTMENT August 5, 1997 Mr. Maynard 3317 Valley Roanoke, VA O. Manning Forge Avenue 24018 RE: Availability No. 97-192 Valley Forge Avenue Tax Map No. 77.13-3-52 Water/Sewer Dear Mr. Manning: f-I Public water and sanitary sewer are available to this property along Valley Forge Avenue, Tax Map No. 77.13-3-52. Public water can be provided by a service connection to the eight inch water line located along Valley Forge Avenue adjacent to this property. At the point of connection, the water pressure would be approximately 70 pounds per square inch (psi). The off-site facility fee is $2,690.00 and the basic connection fee is $500.00. The total connection fee is $3,190.00 per residential connection. The fee includes the connection to the main, meter box, setter and water meter at the property line. It is your responsibility to install the service lateral from the meter to the building under the provisions of the plumbing code. Sanitary sewer can be provided by a service connection to sewer main along Valley Forge Avenue adjacent to this property. The owner would be responsible for the complete installation of the sewer lateral- from the building to the sewer manhole, highway permit, and cleanout at the easement line. You must verify that there is a minimum of two feet of fall from the building service elevation to the top of the sewer main. The Roanoke County Utility Department would make the actual connection to the sewer main after excavation and shoring per OSiiA regulations by your contractor. To schedule the actual tap of the sewer main you should contact the Roanoke County Utility Department two (2) working days prior to installation of the sewer lateral and excavation to the sewer main. The sewer off-site facility fee is $1,500.00, the basic connection fee is $100.00, and the total connection fee is $1,600.00 per residential connection. This fee would include the cost of the connection to the sewer main. 1 206 KESSLER MILL ROAD • SALEM, VIRGINIA 241 53 • (540) 387-6104 ® Printed on Recycled Paper r August 5,. 1997 ~ I Page Two ~ ~ If the owner wants to proceed with these services, please make application and pay the appropriate fees at the Building Permit Office in the Roanoke County Administration Center at 5204 Bernard Drive. You should also install a stake labeled "water meter" at the desired location of the water meter. If the proposed meter location is not marked, the County will install the meter at their discretion. This letter and stated fees are valid to September 1, 1998. If you plan to subdivide this property, you must submit another application for water and sewer service indicating such. Please be advised that a duplex would be considered as two residential connections to the public water and sewer systems. If you have any questions or need additional clarification of the above information, please contact me at 387-6102. Sincerely, Robert C. Fronk, P.E. Utility Engineer RCF/sgh c: Arnold Covey Engineering & Inspections 4 ~=-/ NORTH Q`~r'• ,' 373c ~ ,r \ ,,g g ~' \ • •,\ °t ,qty 37. 3c \ ~~ prJ 49. 3Z\ 2 \ \ \ Jew \ 3x44 /,sr .p zz 48• 3c2s ~ ~ 1•,` ~ R C•B S \ \ ~. 0 •P \38 K ~ 2/ 46• 3cN ~~ ~ 3 °° 7n~ Br°moieron Csn/ir \ \ .,° ` s ~iy2 /J ~ 1O 45 47 0 J"p rho ~RCBS 229 Ac (01 \ \ 40 \ i~~o /' 3637 ~C ..f.~ m 4 '" ' O 3.T2 6c lCl t w ~ / ~^ ' t ~ ~ ,, ~,,, C ~ ,~; 10 ~~Rr: ~ 3aao4~ 42 Ys4s ~~° 3c ss s , , • s°'~ ` • r-- 370 692 '°° , j64! • O~ ~~° ~ ~ /~+r jJd ,o'\/' ~ ° .r 11 / ~` ~ k°nmore '•s~ 9 3c°q . ,` ` _,~` / ot4 y ~s,j n ~ ~ ,~ so \ / \ J6~ 3 •3634 ~_ ~~ t •CIJ \ Q J 3iOf \ Jj 4vQ ~~' " /O ~ 9 6 ,° st'/ .zjs Vo!!QY o\\°~ v ;' ; '"s 51 f9 33D ~oo s1j ~ •P ' ~ ~~. 13 . • . m J S 5 ~ °,~ ~ ''SO rs ~ 33t• w 3405 so ` r `4 - 3 { X~ / ~, ~' ._i• ` ~•J 16 '~ so b ~ '~4 sox ~,;; 4 3319 •Q f so ,' ~• - 55 56„ 9 ° ,r rJ .. ,~., ?\' ,,, ~ fi 9 ~' / ~31e q7 ,~ s 417 o~~ ,. s ,: e: u u / ~ ~ ~. ,_ ^^`, IIT ~! 'so• ,o - JJ ~2 57 Jor ~ ~ s•~i"z. ~~ Concord ]eo 4 ' _ Js ' ss' ,_ ~ s u .t56 ~ g ~ s° ~ o ° 'O ,s ;.~ v S7 _~ ~ rJ ~ -13317" o , u7 j~ a ys~rz4- X 59s zP~9• n\et\ ~ s`e 5 36oD I6 r, ., t'~-~ - '.4r• ~ 45 s s= P .•• u , 17 • 61,• -.~ v,, ~.r 18 ' /9~ ,s ti rt ~ JJ2J y ~+• ~ 3403 - s ~ /J u 3lIQ 53 J `~ w~', ~ y p 44, ~ 3501 : 'o~ ,. •e n sarr '~ : C°~C ~ J91s J, ,r - ~ ~JJ29 i 20 r ~ ~ 341• ~~2 y ~ ~ iuvo $ • 21 /J ¢ 1~~ Or ~J~ , • ~' ~ O' \ ,y, ~ ~ ,` ~^'~ _ .340! ~ ' a.,, 1. 6.1 ~ J'r~ -r'~•'~ ` a° 3! ~ ~ J ,J~,.{ ~ v \ ' 341 t' / / b 62 1~ 23 • "~ •~ 4oooc ~ B'¢-.°, ~ G1 J ~ / •42- /.U I I ~ 24 46 '.. = 24 ~ a,.. ~ ~~ ,••Y ~ .t 341 /. oo zs •63 ~ ~ `~ ,ss, J• ~ 5 b 'D ' '6, 45 o r \ ~ 3424 ~~ ~ ~ 2 ;• 45 " ! ''a ° it 22 ~ •41 rs 64 .. ~b s• •26 ~ ;y1 s . Q so ,J n 3c 9c o ~r / ,r° o d. I 15 /, u 1 \rr ~ V 4~ 43 /' ,f ~e i 2 / 4003 .y v Q 28 •~ ~ 401!! ~ J ~~ ~ r, ~ 3423 ~ 34 '-~ X ~ 66 17 ~ ~i '~ ~J ~ , s2 'j+ }~ t ~ ` / j F '~SO `~' 3346 13 7 n ~ J ~ Q JO O` 41 ~9 J ^~ ~ b ~ " J ~ 401 \ - w ~ • 1J ~ \ ~ . q 3444 43 ` s' 37 !? ~ f 'ss ~ • 4~ • b` yW2 ,f's '7 ~' • 31 \ 32 sD 3 .P ~ 0~ 3709 ^ ~ • O , ^ ,.~ no r2 es N r ,~ ~ 0 3341 , QS/ ,0 ~ v,. •' 26 '~C~y ~ `./0 JO 341y J j~ JJ . • 4oz1 •33 J, ~ !!! IRI • 34 r ~ • r o•, 69 ,~o • ,_, ~ /s u • O~ ~sO.ts ~9 3 •4~`~ Ya 34521ys 3:IS \6 ~o 27 } . • ~ ~ rs / a' ` ~ . . .( //'s ~~ b / ~ '_ , . 1 4Z ', a ... 35 m ~ 28 s, / a4ve ° ` 0 34s~,1.!• ' ~ 29 ' s ,° 34x/ s° ` 7 ~ 7 34t! s ~ ~ 3449 3sn41 ~ ,~~ rf ,e-s° 34 2' ~ Q\. 2 9 s a ~/ • ~ ,, ` ?I ,~ / 35 / JS° 343 ~ ' '~ /4 30 1 ~ 371! r, ~ . 37t2 J 34,v ao / ` u zs rzo ` 3436 ~ u~ . K 1 P • b ` 372 32 ,, m 2 fl ` 9 ~ 3s07 / \ 37783 f /'~ ~, ° rs • 15 ~ ` ~ , ~~ ~ 3009 cue , O usz a ., ;~ H ._isc 3~M ~ \ e.... "" DEPARTI~IVT OF PI,ANNII\'G MAYNARD MANNING Z ' ~ AND ZONING R-1 TO C-1 ,?.. ~ 77.13-3-52 ,1i COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 5204 Bernard Br.~.. P.o. Box 2ssoo Roanoke, VA 24018 t 540 772-2068 FAX (540) 77z=2 t 0• dal -v received Dy app cation fee: PC/SZA dale placards Issued: Boy date: Case Number; Y ::[if if ~: :. [.. !:2:: .~3~. _:[:: ::1:: ::i.. •. . :Ei:9•:•;.; i;:;2:E;3;tEi. .:1 '., •: ~:i. . -•S•- i:i : e2 t t : - iii•: ''L• . t . t . "i•, . ;;, ' . .:i :i.~;:ise:::i:i.'::i:::;:;r .::.:.:.:.:.:: PcoposedZoning: C-2 Forsr~r><[~°o.,~y - Proposed land Use: Home for adults USO ~N'e' Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested disvict? YES X NO tF NO, A VARIANCE 1S REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES X NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIREp FIRST. - If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES R NO - .;s:: viii: ::,:: :ii.,.. - fi~~~itill:issis;€=~~=€°~^~'~ :::::::::::... ::;:;:; ::, ::i:i=i .,. .'i;. // .:. variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enc:osed. APP~,ICATION WILL JvOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF TNESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLEi c. ws v Rrs v as v X .Consultation 8 l/2" x 11' concept plan R Application fee % Application Metes and bounds description X Proffers, if applicable Justification Water and sower application Adjoining property owners l hereby terrify that / am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract Qurchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner Owner's Signature: ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ -'~~ fr(~ f u~ ~ • ~-~ Fnr cfafT f/SP_ O111V LAW OFFICES OSTERHOLIDT. FERGUSON, NATT. _AHERON b AGES ' • A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION • 1918 ELECTRIC ROA O. SUIT E.1 TELEPHONE CHARLES H. O3YCRH OI~OT ~ S+0'774-1197 Hic r.nCl Z- pCrOU90N -_ O. 60X 2006$ ' CDWn4O n. NnTT ' iA7f HO. r.CHnEL J. AHEPON ROANOKE. VIRGINIA s..o•-77.-0ga~ C. STCvCN nOEE 21018`0007 HnRK O. N100 N AI$TEN KONRAD JOHNuTONC - August 4, 199? Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 Gentlemen: Enclosed please find the Application for Rezoning for Shenandoah Homes, Inc. I am also enclosing the necessary documentation including a Proffer, Adjoining Property Owners, Justification fvr Rezoning as well as a Plan showing the development on the pxoperty. It i9 my understanding that the last rezoning Application was filed without the payment of the app).ication fee and I would appreciate your consideration of the same in this matter. Thanl~cing you in aavance for you= attention to this matter, I am Very truly yours, ,,pp Edward A. Natt EAN/laf Enclosures cc: Reverend Otis Burgher Far Staff Use On/y: Case Number The Planning Commission will study re=on;ng and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health. safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following 4uestians as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain hvw the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district•classification in the zoning ordinance. This will bring a nonconforming use into conformity. The purpose of the Petition is to provide for the conformity. No additional construction is intended. Please explain how the project conforms tv the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. It is the intent and the policy of the comprehensive plan to allow for properties in accordance with their use. This rezoning will allow an existing nonconforming use to be brought into conformity with the provisions of the Ordinance. The rezoning will have no additional impact on the services required of the property. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as wail as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, ', parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. .Applicant Shenandoah hTomes, znc. Fa PROFFERS The C-2 uae of the property will be limited the existing home for adults located on the subject property. No additions to the existing facility shall be permitted or allowed under this rezoning. ~ ~ Q' ~ &LUE R10G~ ~' .~~ . ~ ~S. ~ 't ME,NGRraIT ~ ~, .~,7RDE.vS .: ~~ t.,t MAJSON i } tit SOU G OURMET ,tt . t ~ 9. ., ~~, t ~~JE ANCE TO A, gp5~ • z. AIRPORT D. `` ~oyo ~~8 ~ F to `. AL' < TONNE SOU S GEN ~ OANOKE 7EGI0NAL' \\ PORT. AVERS _ ~ 0 ~a NORTH • ~ - yro+~~ s~pz--~ - ,~.a ~ .e 31 29y JOf ~ ~ yzo! ~ r ~ 30s ~~ r / 3B '0 yy r ~ 42 S 1 Spo 9 yfoy 29 ysz' ~ t sy f 1 ~ ~ z • 7 +~. a ~a 60 ` `S r $ ~ p r E i` ~~ 0 37 . 43 oz ' yysz !f 301f b v , y _ sy's "_' ys r .,-? s~3958. ° . ~ ~ y W ~ ~ / f 19 ~• ... •yys. sssl 3lyyof ysoy ~ *' y t. `36 1 35 ~• ~.~ '. P ~ c s' ~ ~ s _ ~ 4 .yszs ~, 36` ~ t 4 3 ~ os ~ ~ JI ~ ~ yl s s . 46 ~ ss'y ylf , • yfos , ~ ~ .. , ~ y ~ „ " .r .a , 4 b ssoz '~ ° ~~ , °~t ~ 1 i~ ~ QIz, 1 L t~` ~ 02 \~'~1~ 4 ~ ' ~~ M , 52 0 P 66 ' ~ + ~ , ~ ~/(~ ~ L ~tl ~ fps l ~'' l .• =3~ z~ CI V 9 J f~0.7~ 4 45 ' = `1 V - J y I "sz, f f _ q . ~ i- P 43 46 •, S7~ / nf'~..fc _ ~ 7 ~ •~ ~ ~ " - i i 9~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ _. Y r ~ m 36 ~ ~ ~ ~o~c IO.K ~ 37 0 ~ ~~ . ~• 6 ~ ~ciom • c e v ...,d.... ~ ' ~ U `c ~~ o e '' ~ ^ Ig '~ ` 1 z ` 2B 32 ~• ~ 2 JBK ' V ' .i ' 4 ~~ ~ L ~ u ~ ~~ ~ 20 23 +i Q,cr~ 16° J '' z 2 Z~ i S J '~0 22 v 9 -~ o ~J8 •µ o Y Z3, I SHENANDOAH HOMES INC. _ ~" * DEPARTMENT OF PLANIVIATG R-3 T© C-2& SPECIAL USE PERMIT _' >~ AND ZONING 38.14-1-34 ._ If,f / / i / i i~ i . / ~ .' COUNTY OF ROANOKE f DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 520~- Bernard Dr. P.O. E3ox 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 ( 540' 772-2068 FAX (5~+0) 772-21 08 cyt~s ~z7'~11~ `r2i~>r i~/~ a~P~- ~~ 8/z~~a~ ~ ~. 3 For staff cise only date ~~~ i {c(~', re ived by: applicatio~r~ee: ~~ ~BZA date: ~o s~ placards i u d: cS $ 2- 4~ EiOS ate: ra 2b 51 Case Number: ~ M /~ Check type of application filed (check all that apply): D REZONING L~' SPECIAL USE ~ VARIANCE Applicant's name: Wendy's of Western Virginia, Inc. (Lessee) PriO°°~ 774-9521 Address: 3959 Electric Road, Suite 206 Roanoke, Virginia Zip Code:24018 Owner's name: 419 Partnership Phone: 774-1208 Address: 3904 Franklin Road, SW Roanoke Virginia Zip Code:24014 Location of property: Tax f~iap Number: 77.20-1-6 ' Wendy s Restaurant 4369 Electric Road Magisterial District: Cave S rin Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Community Planning Area: Cave Spring Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: C-2 1.43 acres Existing Land Use: Commercial: Wendy's Restaurant with Drive-Thru 62, 290 sq.ft. Window :: ::;g:~ 1 ~~ Proposed Zoning: C-2 For Staff Use c~~y Proposed Land Use: Commercial: Wendy's Restaurant with Drive-Thru Use Type: Window ( Kitchen and Dining Room addition will increase net square footage 10+~) J ~.~ , .~-.-- ~-i ws v ars v ws v x Consultation x 8 1/2" x 1 1" concept plan x Application fee x Application ''' Metes and bounds description ~~' Proffers, if applicable x Justification ~: V~later and sewer application x Adjoining property o~~vners . ~. l hereby certify that l am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge ~d con nt of the owner. Owner's Signature: ~~~ ~ ^ ~f~ ~~~ J ~ `~ "''~ ~~, Is the application complete? Please check if enclcsed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ,ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. Foi StaN Use Only: Case Number Applicant Wendy's of Western Virginia, Inc. ~3 The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general ~ielfare. Please answer the follo~::ing questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance {Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. Applicant's existing and proposed land use.is a legally established use under C-2 General Commercial District. However, Toning Ordinance Section 30-23-2(F) requires the approval of a Special Use Permit when there is a ten(10) percent or greater increase in the square footage of the use of structure proposed for expansion or enlargement. Applicant's proposed project will exceed 10~ when both phases are completed. See Special Use Permit Attachment for additional information. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Rca~oke County Comprehensive Plan. Applicant believes that its request conforms to the guidelines and policies of the County's Comprehensive Plan and will continue to be used in a manner consistent with the adjacent properties or Core areas including 1. Policy C-1: Encourage the development of intensive,mixed use Urban Development in designated Core areas to provide Retail Centers that serve the growing suburan population of Roanoke County, and to provide Fiscal balance and generate increased Tax Revenues. 2. Policy C-2: Serve each Core area by arterial or higher grade street 3. Policy C-4: Coordinate the design of _Commercial sites in regard to site-to-site movement and minimize vehicular access points to Public streets. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. Applicant anticipates no impact on adjoining porperties or. surrounding area with common Public right of way serving traffic signal already located at Route 419 and TAnglewood Mall, nor any additional.. impact on Public services or facilities. . F3 Wendy's of Western Virginia, Inc. Special use Permit Application - Attachment August, 1997 Purpose Applicant wishes to expand and renovate its kitchen and dining room areas. This expansion will increase existing square footage more than loo and requires this special use permit for such expansion. Applicant will continue to use this property as a Wendy's restaurant with drive-through window service. Other Considerations 1.Property compromising tax map no 77.20-1-6 consists of two parcels, Wendy's restaurant and old Photo USA property. Applicant has long-term lease for both Wendy's restaurant and adjoining "Photo USA" property to west. Lease control of this adjoining property provides applicant with additional parking spaces for Wendy's customers. 2. Customer parking space angles will be improved from 15 degrees to 30 degrees adjacent to proposed dining addition to improve traffic patterns. 3. Existing and proposed use information shown below: EXISTING PROPOSED Seating 96 120 Square Footage: Building and Solarium 2,456 2,456 Free standing storage unit 190 - Backroom addition (Est.) - 570 Dining addition (Est.) 290 Total 2,646 3,316 Page 1 of 3 ~3 Wendy's Of Western Virginia, Inc. Special Use Permit Application Attachment 4. Applicant plans to execute expansion project in two phases: 1) Kitchen or backroom additions and renovations including removal of existing free-standing storage unit (approx. 180 sf). 2) Dining room addition and renovations 5. Applicant currently provides ingress and egress to rear parking area of old "Color Tile" building (see double arrows on Concept Plan at southwest corner of property). Page 2 of 3 (~ • a • w • .~ • w • s. • w • w • w . ~w ~ w. • . • sr • rta ) 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 ExISI'if`!~'+ 1 0 1 W&JD~/S ~E'S1l4UR~ ~_ 3 Cj ~ 1 1 I !v ~ j I; ~~9 1 I ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ ~i oRt~R STATION - ~.II ~, E?`_` P~~;:~e 1 45' FRGM R1W~2 - !~ -- ~ ~5 ' 1 ..~. a ~ `r ", ~ I ~' 1 ~ 1 -~ ~aVl AGt~ITkt•! ~~'---~~ ~ 1 ~, ~ Q ' -1 ~ G ~ ~ ~'~ F r , ~ ~ A 1 I n ~ ~ d ~ ~~ •.. ~' 4 j ~ ~ ~ ~~ /,/ 1 v! Q ~ I ~X ~ ~ - ~ ~ •~1 1 ~ r, ~ ~ 1 g 2z -o• v ~~• -o- - 1-~ j ~ i - - ------ --- , % ~ 1 _ O ExIT-Gt~4..Y ~~ Q '~ SIG-~td U 1 ~ ~J =-_ L ~7--- ---- t~ ----~ 1 ~ ~;t1STIhSG f ' y~NVY'S ~ 1 ~ d_P.51G-i! - s • w • .~ • w • s . w . ca • w • wo • .~ • w ^ d e T/at~l.. ~I Q J~ d . ,` O JQ V q (~ i /~ ~ ScAcF; t -- 3a 7- Lg- p~ ~T `{l ~ E'~~ 2r ~ ~~o c .,fir ~ „OOi ~ /1:: ~,•..~.':,':.'~ NURSINL ~ 6 ~143j;-.. w~-. ~ I. ~O- ,~.. 04 Sow < < ~y U,y Pr;\ OM `~~g`'B9, ~ v,~tWlN ~ ,~,~` QE' / ? ~ :..::;, 0 2J" `tiring ,,r,~ ...Q~ ~'~:::: o ~hN ~ .~' Q. •44 GrtenWTley ~~rKC) ~ c (~2'L'-,'~~,~\ 1 ~ /~~iEN~I I ~ Elem. SCA 'trig..: ~ ~iF O ' • EV resat-;-~ `~ p ~ ~ . ~' os'~' - Fi { ' ~ g`~ra~ fPl L S ~ tifr,'II~pJ`i' ~~./ ~'~'O '~C~~ w r~CR ~ j, \C"i'~'Q`Oi~ ~ P I~5 / e~6 ~ r OL10A ~ i, ~ TLZ ~ J~a R I J/ ~4 1 ~/ INN CYPg555PARX ~' O ` Opp c,~~^ W000 / eAK ~f d ~ Y1409 vc' .`~''`+ GRIST L ~ a 'a} iJ ~ ~ ~~F r ~T 2 ~p~'Y/ ~~~ P ~/ ~`~y~~.NAR7 ~,-'~~s ~v vpLO S , ~9 yTORES iQQ'y~ EitS ' ~ ~ _ ~ Z 0 ~,« ~ ~ < ~ 5 ~ . < < D I~ ~ 3 NORTH ~~~ / ~ \ l ~- \ ~- v / I ~: ~ C/, ~ a Z +, 15.1 17 S .; ti ~~ ~~ j "' ~J I S 1.16 A c ~ ~o 14~% ~~ / J ~ ti ^ r~ ~~ ~~` / ,; 12 '~ }~ : IJAS • i ~ 'wt9 ~ ~J 91 ~ 9 / ,, 8 0 , ` , P/0 77.16-I-2 ,t ,s` I~ • I00~ / ti ~~ - :7 -g ~~y / ~ 1 3 ~v~ / ~` `~ s a 91 ~~ i =~ ~ ~ ~ ~, T,~ ti ~ `~,~ a~. 0; ,S 0~~ ` / i~ ~ . ' / ca` 6.21• Ac r~ : LOO AClC1 ~ ~ ~' ~~~ L 28 3c ~y -LI / ~ ~ O no ~ S~ r I Q, f ~^ ~ ~ ` ~~1~2' `~0 ~` ~Vr a 'L~ ~ .~~'~*` _ ..~-' n Pit WENDY'S OF WESTERN VA INC.- . "" DEPARZT~NT OF PLANNII~'G S P E C~ I AL USE P E RM I T _~= ~ 77. 0-1-6 - AND ZONING ,~ ~.,. COUN-1~Y OF RO~NOKE DEPT. Oi~ F'L.ANNING AND 7.ONING 52011 RFrn~rtl i)r. P.O. FlOx 2~~~n Roanoke, VA 7~t01 fi ( 51i0, 772.-zoc~ Fnx (5ho 1 772-2 t c)~ Tor stall use only _ ------- jj _ ._r da(Mrc~eiv~~1: ~/1~l71 rr•~~iv.r1 ~' :,pplicati ~r a ~~~`'`~ CiBZ ~'•' placards issued: BOS dir.: Case Number; -- ~~ ~~ L ~-- '•i:: i;,; i;iii ::~t::i:'~ii;.ia:i~i:i: i:i:i: i:;;.: l 11 i:ii:i:iiiii:..:. ::i; . '•i,•. . :.:::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: . ~J ~i~~~'ii~iiii `~~iE~`~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~iii_i_i5iii~i~~'~~i''_ ~i'_it:i;:;ii:p_?_~_?S?~~'~`_`_ ~-'~0_~-`~`.~0~`__".`~~`~`~`- Check type of application filed (check all that apply): L~ RE7.OlJING ^ SPECIAL USE ^ VARIANCE Applicant's name: Radford & Company Pt,one; 540-343-5000 24014 2740 Franklin Road SW, Roanoke, Virginia lip Code: Ar)(IrF?SS: Ownr~r's Warne: Mary E. Radford Phone:540-343-5000 Address: 2740 Franklin Road SW, Roanoke, Virginia 7_ip Code: 24014 Location of property: Tax Map Number. 26.20-04-27 Peters Creek Road (Rt 117) P:tagisterial District: Hollins Area: -~+-~- i f t i ~~ y ng ann ty Commun Sipe of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: C-2-C 1 ,144 acres - ------ Existing Land Use: 'I'1:-ansition sq.ft. :j ::::::::::::: ~~:;: :::::::::::::::::::~:::::~: ~:;:;:;:::::;'~:;:;: ~: ~: ~':::: Proposed 7_oning: C-2-C Proposed land Use: Office For sralf Use O~%v use Type: floes the parcel meet the minimum lot area, ~::idth, and frontage requirements of the requested district? NO IF NO, A VARIA?JCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. YFS X _ _ _ f)nes the parcel meet the minimum criteria for tie requested Use Type? YES _ X f 10 _______ IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. }{ If rezoning request, are conditions being preff_r=d with this request? YES NO Variance of Section(s) ___ ___ _- _ ____ of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinanr_e in erg=r to: Not applicable ( y,- I ; the applir_ation complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NU I t1t Al.l.tr r to rr f~rr r ter 1 f IFSE ITE~~1S ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. nis v rti~ v ws v Consultation 8 1 /2" x 1 1 " concept plan Application fee Application <_>. --- ~`'~?? Metes and bounds description -.-« Proffers, if applicable ;rv Justification <::~s:~ Water and sewer application Adjoining property o~•:ners 1 hereby certUy that l am either the owner o/ the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and a~n ar.rinq with the knowledg d c nse a owner. Agent for Owner O~~~ner's Sign~ttire: -- ---------- IZADFORD OFFICE BUILDING 'I~AX MAP 26.20-04-27 "TEX"TUAL STATEMENT Purpose: The purpose of this rezoning request is to modify an existing condition number 1 of the rezoning approved by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors on July 12, 1997. Said condition states "(I ) Site to be developed in substantial conformity with the site plan of T. P. Parker & Son, submitted herewith." This request is to change from a single land office building to three smaller structures. The smaller buildings will serve as a transition behveen the existing residential development area north and the commercial development along Peters Creek Road. Proposed Ilse: Office band tlse: Transition Current Toning: C'-2-C General Commercial District Acreage: 1 . 114 acres Comprehensive Plan: The proposed use of this property is encouraged by die Roanoke County Comprehensive Development Plan. F~9 Proposed Conditions: The site shall be developed in substantial compliance with the conceptual site plan, SK-l, dated 21 August 1997 as prepared by Jones c~ Jones Associates, Architects PC. • ~~ . \~, `~' 'L~~O ' ~' `~ d ~~ ~~~~Q ~ ~ ® o~ ~fi ®o° °o ~' y'g' ° v ~s~. O \ \ \ \ `\ ,~, ~~~. . ~,, ~/ y- ~~~ ,'° ~~ ~ b ~ P~ ~~ Q ~~.. ~,~. Ste. ~`o~~ ~,P ~ ~;~. ~ ~~~ ~~~ ~o'~® \~Op~ ?\ \\ ~~ C ~p® ;., ~~ ~~ ~. ..~~.. ~, ~% ~~o - °~ ~~'~Qd~ a~' ~ a~. ~ ~_ ~~. ~ ~ ~\ ~ ,. , ~ ~~~~ ~ ° EXISTING GR055 ~ ~ AGGE55 EASEMENT ~ ~ ~~NE5 JONE5 A880CIAT^8 ARCNITeCTB o • e' x' m' O ~O~ ~O ~ ~~ ~~ R •7164.19' L • 116.69' GFiORfl DRb. ^ S 48' PO' SD' W ~~~~^ GONGEPTUAL 51TE PLAN scu.e r • So'-o' nRnwir~s ~a 21 AU619~17 RADFORD OFFICE COMPLEX ROANOKE COUNTY V I R C3I N IA l i~,~TF.: 21 August 1997 ~)~•V~1~Ut~t'1~1~~.}~~~'t ~~-y~'~'[l~~tCt~~.'~'~ON ~t!`,~~:~ ` 1 !•~~l_,1Cf11`f 1 ~1~~V~~1/1,A~11~N ~ ~~^ f4` Jones & Jones Associates, ,~rrl,tc~AMr: Architects PC Ft1oNE: 540-366-3335 FA!t:: 540-366-3613 OWNER: Radford & Company ptIONE: 540-343-5000 g}~; 540-343-5135 Jones & Jones Associates, ~~ Architects PC Ptit7tJ$: 540-366-3335 ~A~t: 540-366-3613 Roanoke, Virg, nia 24019 - SITS ~C)~ATION j FROPEtiTY ADbR1rSS: Peters Creek Road nFV1;LOPM>~NTNAM>;: Radford Office Park FROfiOSI;b USt;: Office nEV~LOFED AR1iA: 1 -114 acres TA,~c MAI' N: 26 .20-04-27 tlI'tAbl;b AREA: .75 acres MAGISTEILIAL UIS;rI2ICT: Hollins 7..ONING: C-2-C fi01~AL t1;v2TS: 3 RE~Q.IU? ~t1ilyS F,1L~ L~>i: wA'T1;R ZrACiLITIES: C~fi~) ~ CI-i'Y - TotV~1 bF V~11'ON SEtiVEIt PACILiTII;S: (CtIUN-~Y) > CITY - TOW~t CSF VINTON TOTAL LOTS: - PRIVA~'E - WELL) - SEPTIC SYSTEivt) 1S 13UiLbiNG TO BE $p~~1KL~R~~? No FLOW 12EQ1J7REb: G.F.~t --- ~t1X~.,~~i G ~~7~xATION CN~~~ CONSTFtt;Ct1(~N A~'V~ RENO~ATIO~+~ RUILDTI~IG AREA: 15,000 square feet OCC1J15ANCY LOAD: 150 CONSTRUCTION TYP1/: J\ ~~ I S Cl BastC ~ U Comprehensive O Subdivision O Preliminary File No. (Staff Use Only) Atin1tESS: 6120 Peters Creek Road Roanoke, Virginia 24019 ___ Abbt~SS: 2740 Franklin Road SW -Suite 3 Roanoke, Virginia 24014 _ AbbR>/SS: 6120 Peters Creek Road COCA USE GROUP The Appliclnt r~questS ttvl~w tU1d epptbVel bf'd dtvtlopmtnt pl!!tl tl~ulttd byCo~tY Zoning Ordinance. Thy plans conform ~~ith applicable sections of th8 County . _ 2btfing Ordindritt. tt IS tltidtrStbod that submissiotl bf intieeurate or incomplete information may delay final ~pprov9l of tht Ct1ft'lpfttlC'~lttlt? ddvElbptntnt pl2n~. t do hereby eMify that t Aflly UAdEI~t>!!1d thtr provisions 6f thb EtiilltlA tlatd StditnMt Control Otditlgftc!! ~ttd program, and the abo~•e•refcrenced projtta ~S ~pp~ev~d. t Fut1NEE qt~~ tit? ti~Nt-eP tntry to this pre)tet, tai drsc Ab vt, to thb dt! !!tt!d pttSonnel for the purpose of inspecting and rrtonitorin~ Cor contpil~tit`!r tCtfA tAd A(tfft#Ald OrdinancZ. - i F APPLICANT A FOR OWNER 5B B NOTL: All 130Lb stctiott5 a~thi! eppllcation Must bt filled but gfid ttLr tniyp 2ttached prior to iSSu9net of water and sewer availability. }i; .3 ,, ''" ~ ~ + ', ~~~'' -~ ``~;~yt~ -' ~,e ~i , "i' a T. ;~`yE, y'_.' ,=•~. . ~ w ~ ~w ;dam .h +~ a ~'.' ~ ~ S ~' ~} 3 ~d~ ~ ~.R. j~. ~ ~ ~~R 1~: ~ +, u ~~. ' ~. y'~ ~~. ~b t <~~ 'bra. .~ '~ ~S"~ { .t kki''SSS~^^^^~~ i ~~j~Y K. ~, ,: .4..., ~ ~ ~. -;y _ ` ~` .) n ~ .~ Vie' .`.. is y;gR~Cj~br`KLAWrN,y':~, ~ ~~% ti ~ '~~ ~ ~~+Y~(. n':'" ~ ~5 Y~ ~ ~ rt~l A C A IV ~ Q N C V - ''~~i ~ 1 2 ~ ,,+• I } ~~_~~K'~ \L ;y `': ~ 1~ t Y i '' w ~~,r .~. 0 .J .. / •,.~ J ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~s V - ' ~ 'ry ~. ~ any; , y ~ ~-'~ `~A •~ i+r~,~ ~`~~: YL%- ~~// ~. `~'A':`~4, ,~~ `.,`,• t ~' v4 . • ._ ~ _ ` !r ~ ,rte ~ .. ~• J~" ~I y" ~ ~,~ .,,..+' Tai . ~ '~ ~ ' ~'.~-~/ ~ ,~.}Y ~~f" ~'. ~~ ~ l~ ~ ~"%" F? ~t 4't ~. t 4ri~:n. ~~ ~.~"~.i ~~~:. ~e:(J a ~~~ ~_ C -j,~;,• e &". ,. ,t s va, . ._ .~~ ~ ~• M,4~' ~' 888 h y ; ~/ • D NORTH .,, RADFORD & CO. ~._ DEPARTMENT OF PIlANNII~'G C-2C TO C-2C AMEND CONDITIONS a• 2. ~ AND ZONING 26.20-4-27 :? O ' . v y' ~ TM'/ PERK/H 0'~ C/ S? F SOS ~`7` /' II HE ~?~ UR INGTO C.•1i~EVIE'. ~ yTfGAfcA-W 9~ '(. ~11~/ ~ 4t MANG Y oc ::. EVIE r- _ ~o "-.., w .. ° AFfS ° 0> . '0RNfJi3T0NE' ORQ ~ K q ~. '; u CENTRAL ,O~ P~OJ R- ~: ' CNU CH S ~ "' ~ ~S" ~~ PARx zl ~.~ UEh10 TON o ~~.q~'" -- ~ 2 o- '; ~- Yip ~,~+::>~> :;~ 'b ~/,' .%q~V,~,`~~::<:. COMM+~N ?faR.EST.2 `: _ ,J .~.3Y' /~~''}/~Q~vx~ty ~.~ ~~C3)1~ ygl+ COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke. VA 24018 17031 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 For staff use only S date received. recei ed by. 22 '~ application fee: PC/BZA date: c . 7 g -7 placards issued: BOS d te: i e Oc_ {, Z6 ~7 Case Number: ~ `~ Check type of application filed (check all that apply): ^ REZONING ®SPECIAL USE ^VARIANCE Applicant's name: City of Roanoke, Virginia (contact Greg Reed) Phone: 853-2035 Address: 215 Church Avenue, SW, Room 350 Zip Code: 24011 Roanoke, Virginia Owner's name: Varies (see attached listing) Phone: Addre ~ Zip Code: Location f property: ''(I) 400.,NW~, ,~.~ t ...,,...., ., .,,..,F X't~{?~ :!,W Q KEG" Tax Map Number: Varies - see attached i~n,~tersectio spa or Dv 't • 1724).~&nvoy `: t~:~°7:,~ (2) Magisterial District: Catawba 300' SE of the Send of Candlelight Circle Rt. 1739 Community Planning Area: peters Creek Size of parcel (sl: Existing Zoning: Varies -see attached 17.7 acres Existing Land Use: Vacant, agricultural 770,257 sq.ft. Proposed Zoning: No proposed zoning changes ............................. For Sratt use or,/y Proposed Land Use: Regional Stormwater Management Basins Use Type: Publicly maintained Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES X NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES X NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application completel Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v ~vs v ws v Consultation 8 1 /2" x 11 " concept plan Application fee Application Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable Justification ~ Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners l hereby certify that l am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner. ~Z t~ 7 Owner's Signature: ~,5 ' ' Justification for Special Use Permit Request Applicant: City of Roanoke, Virginia Peters Creek Flood Reduction Project Please exp/ain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as we// as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicab/e zoning district c/assification in the zoning ordinance. The proposed project consists of two regional storm water management basins. The basins are sited on vacant land with one located in the Montclair area and the other in the lower North Lakes area. Both basins are "dry" impoundments that only fill with water during significant storm events. The basins are conservatively designed and provide significant flood reduction benefits for all storms up to the 500 year event. The proposed basins further the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance by providing increased safety from flooding for Roanoke City and County residents located downstream from the facilities. The site area of the proposed basins will remain in natural vegetative cover thereby preserving open space and supporting the protection of surface and groundwater resources. The proposed basins are located in areas of varying zoning classification. These classifications include R-1, R-2, R-3, and C-2. The proposed basins support the purpose of all of these classifications by providing conservation of open space, increased flood protection, and protection of surface and groundwater resources. The proposed facilities are designed to be regional in nature and provide peak flow reduction in a more efficient and cost-effective manner than numerous smaller facilities. These facilities are being constructed at the sole expense of the City of Roanoke. Significant benefits will be realized by both City and County residents. P/ease explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. The proposed basins support many of the stated guidelines and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. These include protection of open space, critical slopes, floodplains and natural drainage corridors, and groundwater recharge areas. The proposed basins offer an opportunity for a regional facility providing significant flood hazard mitigation in both jurisdictions. This is also consistent with stated policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Please describe the impacts of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as wel/ as the impact on pub/ic services and faci/ities, inc/uding water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. The impact on the subject property is disturbance during construction of the proposed dam embankments. Residents may be impacted by noise and dust during the proposed construction duration of four months. The subject properties that will be impacted by impounded water will be acquired as either fee simple or drainage and impoundment r--5 easements by'the City of Roanoke. Both embankments have been carefully and conservatively designed and meet all requirements of a state dam safety regulated facility, although the proposed facilities do not meet the minimum size for regulation. The proposed embankments will be constructed of earth and will be restored with grass cover. The North Lakes basin will be fenced with black fabric chain link fencing and the Montclair basin will be fenced with black fabric chain link fence adjacent to residential property and standard farm fencing adjacent to agricultural property to promote safety and reduce visual impact. Screening of the facilities will be provided as required by the zoning ordinance. The surrounding properties will benefit by preservation of open space and protection of natural drainage ways. Visual impact of the facilities should be minimal after restoration of vegetation. Impact of the proposed projects on public services and facilities is minimal. There should be no impact on water and sewer facilities, roads, schools, or parks, and fire/rescue should be enhanced by improved safety and access due to reduced flooding. ~~~_ ~SI ~~ 1 ~- ~ o ; _~_ ~ , - ~ o ~ ; ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ,~f ocb: ~m ~ a ~. l ~~ ~ I ,~ ' 7 ;0 I._.. ~, ~ _ _- ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ,;/ i ~ / :' ;: O, :~. O~ G- -/ O • / ~: °e ° ° ° X 4 ~ ~' _' ~ .... ' ~O / /~ i~~ i /'. ... iY s ~: ~B ~ ~~~0r~ ., ~~~ -r,o n 0 °~-- ~ ~ :' a ~q ~° ~o s~o .w N ~~J >•~`r OZ w tr'~ ~- \5~~~ ~ v~~NO•.z t~ ~-~. ~ . ; ,~, ~e ~ 6 ~~~ 1'' ` S M ~> >, I`\J \- 3f+~9~ / ~ I ~ g~~j4 e '' ~~ ,, O )~ ~`~ % ~~~ ,~ ~. ~, ;; , ~ ~._ ~~~~~ Z V J m~ W vW y ~ ~ QOo°' z F- o Q z c~ t= Q W II N ~ ~ - c~n W ~- ~ ~ ~ O~QQ E-- Q ~ Q UU o z Q -- L.. \ ,_ ~ \ My6ti~ \ 1 ~•~ IOO' ~ i \\ i ~ \ ~ ~ ` ~ 1 ~~ .~. O ```~ ~ _ }~ ` \ ~ ~ { r _ ~ 1 ,~ ` , ~~. l ~. ~ } ~ ~ • ~ .__ .~ I s qt r-~ -~ i ~~ - ~~ • ,.. ... i „~ '~ ~ ~- ~, _ " .i ~ ti r~.. / ~ =~ ~ ~!~ is ~ u ~+a I w. - ' , ~ to a u. w i' ~" ~„ u• Jk.,~ c •r : ~ • ~ r _ ~ .; j ~ r ~, 4 m~ •• ~ ~ f • f ¢ s ! < q j •~ •M ~~ ~. •~ ~ t i 0 •4 = ~ ~ _ `r \ • a~ f • .e- ~. "~ . % .~ •~--~ ~' ~ DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING CITY OF ROANOKE MONTCLAIR " _ ~ 36.15-1-10 • AND ZONING SPECIAL USE PERMIT .,, COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 -. (7031 772-2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 For staff use on~ date received: racer ed by: 2z 1 application fee: PC/BZA dater c . ~ ~7 placards issued: BOS daa~te: ~ Oc.t, 2.6 q7 Case Number: ~ /D Check type of application filed (check all that apply): ^ REZONING ®SPECIAL USE ^VARIANCE Applicant's name: City of Roanoke, Virginia (contact Greg Reed) Phone: 853-2035 Address: 215 Church Avenue, SW, Room 350 Zip Code: 24011 Roanoke, Virginia Owner's name: Varies (see attached listing) Phone: Address: '~, .C~~ ~ Zip Code: ~ Location of property: (1) 400' NW of Tax Map Number: Varies -see attached intersection of Ambassador Drive (Rt. 1724) & Envoy Drive (Rt. 1703) (L Magisterial District: Catawba F. 00'S'E a eS'"end ~ ~ Ca elgh G'~'~R' :~ X39 ~`' ~ Communi Plannin Area: ~ g Peters Creek Size of parcel (s): ~ Existing Zoning: Varies -see attached 17.7 acres Existing Land Use: Vacant, agricultural 770,257 sq.ft. Proposed Zoning: No proposed zoning changes ............................. For Staff Use On/y Proposed Land Use: Regional Stormwater Management Basins Use Type: Publicly maintained Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES X NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the. minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES R NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v ws v ws v Consultation 8 1 /2" x 71 " concept plan Application fee Application Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable Justification Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners /hereby certify that l am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner. Owner's Signature: ~Zt/ 7 F-~ Justification for Special Use Permit Request Applicant: City of Roanoke, Virginia Peters Creek Flood Reduction Project P/ease exp/ain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as we// as the purpose found at the beginning of the app/icable zoning district c/assification in the zoning ordinance. The proposed project consists of two regional storm water management basins. The basins are sited on vacant land with one located in the Montclair area and the other in the lower North Lakes area. Both basins are "dry" impoundments that only fill with water during significant storm events. The basins are conservatively designed and provide significant flood reduction benefits for all storms up to the 500 year event. The proposed basins further the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance by providing increased safety from flooding for Roanoke City and County residents located downstream from the facilities. The site area of the proposed basins will remain in natural vegetative cover thereby preserving open space and supporting the protection of surface and groundwater resources. The proposed basins are located in areas of varying zoning classification. These classifications include R-1, R-2, R-3, and C-2. The proposed basins support the purpose of all of these classifications by providing conservation of open space, increased flood protection, and protection of surface and groundwater resources. The proposed facilities are designed to be regional in nature and provide peak flow reduction in a more efficient and cost-effective manner than numerous smaller facilities. These facilities are being constructed at the sole expense of the City of Roanoke. Significant benefits will be realized by both City and County residents. Please exp/ain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and po/icies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive P/an. The proposed basins support many of the stated guidelines and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. These include protection of open space, critical slopes, floodplains and natural drainage corridors, and groundwater recharge areas. The proposed basins offer an opportunity for a regional facility providing significant flood hazard mitigation in both jurisdictions. This is also consistent with stated policies of the Comprehensive Plan. P/ease describe the impacts of the request on the property itse/f, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as we// as the impact on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schoo/s, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. The impact on the subject property is disturbance during construction of the proposed dam embankments. Residents may be impacted by noise and dust during the proposed construction duration of four months. The subject properties that will be impacted by impounded water will be acquired as either fee simple or drainage and impoundment F-~ easements by the City of Roanoke. Both embankments have been carefully and conservatively designed and meet all requirements of a state dam safety regulated facility, although the proposed facilities do not meet the minimum size for regulation. The proposed embankments will be constructed of earth and will be restored with grass cover. The North Lakes basin will be fenced with black fabric chain link fencing and the Montclair basin will be fenced with black fabric chain link fence adjacent to residential property and standard farm fencing adjacent to agricultural property to promote safety and reduce visual impact. Screening of the facilities will be provided as required by the zoning ordinance. The surrounding properties will benefit by preservation of open space and protection of natural drainage ways. Visual impact of the facilities should be minimal after restoration of vegetation. Impact of the proposed projects on public services and facilities is minimal. There should be no impact on water and sewer facilities, roads, schools, or parks, and fire/rescue should be enhanced by improved safety and access due to reduced flooding. ~~ O' O O O `.. - ~ O O O O ...~-~~` ~ ~ - - - Ott . - - _- ~_ __ ~a __ _ ~~m~ 00 ' %~, t``~'a~ ZYhc q a ~ ~ ~ ~ia' ~'c ~ ~', ~ ~ n ,,N ^z ~n~ 5~0 ~~,o.~ ~~d _ ~'g '~ m z ~~? 1 ~ X ~.~~°~ -- ~. i -... .. ~..t X ;.. - I ~. ... .-.. U aj ~"~ U ~ ~11 ?~ 1 ~ ~~,~'' ~~~ ~ ~~ i 3Nb'l lltH SVIOFYJIN SIIIH Sb'~OHOIN XZi n n O 361X <OH ~\ ,~ _ ~ i i.' X .!'1 ~ N ~~; ... __ _. ~n ~A ~ ~' ~ -, z - _ ,i ~/ - -- ---- lr."r~ - - - ' 1 ~. . 1 =: ~^~ N an .~ZQi ~~ ~ i ~ ~ "~ ~QF ~iTO ~~ Q ,~ ~ o '~ N:~ 1 pU, /~ ._ _ . _ _ f -~ ~ , i n ~ i ~' ~ f ri ~~ N n ~~ ~ n ~x ~~ ~~~ z ~n X Z V J M~ W z ~_ F- W w rn 0 W ~~ z~~N ~ ~ I I ///v~~nn/. 1..~ ~ - ~ Q W ~ O~QQ ~-_~'~ ~_ U ~ 0 Z 1..1J O • ~v ~,~,~ ~+1"bTi e~ ai t~ ~ \ I } ~ .; .~\` ` \\ ~ 'oyorn rG3 t ` . ~~ ^~ ' ~ y ' ~ ~ yi•~, f °G-'. Jam, • ~ t E_s~ ir, n'/~-~~J r~ 7' .' , _I `~ [ p' S~ cWHrr scN 4° o • .u+ +•d, T ~ ~ ~,.~/ ,'~ ~~.,rp~~'l ~/IFN • ~/~AOMrINIS7RRION iMt~M~ P~V ~ [~If .~ $ 9p,G \ ..r 'p, ~~C _~C~ ~ ~'\r\IJ N/12 \t^ r S7 C~oEvE \; .~7" / `,•"F`i~ltl' ~~ ~ ` A'A `~ `~ ~i ~ J SO+M rArln.K.~~~ rl. ~ ~ _: ~s\r i i~ ~\ ~\ \ ,- n 9 P• EMI_SSAAY 'v 1 ~ .~/ 494 ~ tE 1 (kEN 1 ~4 - `1, wy~c ~`c ~ ~~ 1 ~c+~, i ~rE' t00. QT ' yua4 °F` \4,f \° 1 ~ i .t~ ~ _ M!-`` '•~\m~ \rL ARROW w000 ~~yy "'°' ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ s -: OEvV~, I.ION'~AIF.~T ~ ~40 ~ ~ (/.' MI~7R~Rr\N-~ , :~. ,t r \ wr a (/ ~.~ v J~~ ~ ,,,,. y\~H~'~J(/M~`,°P 4 S ~ Kr~ Fl ; /) ~ ~r -[s.. /~~ ~ l r~F'a ,~. .. i ~$~ ow..a t ''9~~~OA 4 ~ ~ 111 ~ r ~~ ~( ~, i `.. 1. s9 \ ~. p F-~0 NORTH COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING .520'-? Bernard Dr.~ . P.O. BOX 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 ( 540' 772-2068 F ~X (.540) 772-2108 For staff use only dater received b•/~ applicatio f _ PCiEZA da;_• placardsplacards issued: EOS date: Casa Number: ,~ ~~ Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, 4viCth, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES g NO IF NO, A VAS(:-.NCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for :.`,= requested Use Type? YES % NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being prc~f~~_~ with this request? YES NO ~'.~'~~~-`f~~.'~~.~ ~...~~~~'.~. •'~`~.~~ ~•.~~.:.~~~ ~.~~~.'..~.:.....~~. ... .mil Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in cr~a; to: Is the application complete? Please check if e^c!csed. APPLICATION WILL t`tOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. rvs v wi v ws v % Consultation % 8 1 /2" x i i " concept plan % Application fee' '~''S' Ntetes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable Application <>:,:;;;. % Justification `%~s _ Water and rawer application Adjoining property owners l hereby certify that l am ei the ot~~ner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the know/ dge nd c s/ent r t~ owner. /j,~ Owner's Signature: d %Q-~ d 1'~ ~ ~. ~~`'`'r i .~ ~- . Proposed Zoning: C-2 (remove conditions) For Starr Use c.:;y Proposed Land Use: Any use per C-2 zoning Use Type: MAGEE, FOSTER, GOLDSTEIN & SAYERS + A P R O f E S S I O N A L C O R P O R A T I O N ' 37 West Church Avenue, Suite 1200 • P.O. Box 404 • Roanoke, Virginia 24003-0404 (540) 343-9800 • Telecopier (540) 343-9898 • E-Mail: lawmfgs®gnn.com August 22, 1997 HAND-DELIVERED The County of Roanoke Department of Planning and Zoning 5204 Bernard Drive P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 RE: Rezoning Application for Jack F. Walrond, Jr. Dear Sir or Madam: ~~ Please find attached an Application filed on behalf of Jack F. Walrond, Jr. for the rezoning of New Lot 2 A and New Lot 2 B from C-2 Conditional to C-2. I have also attached a Concept Plan for the proposed new office building, a metes and bounds description, the proffers and a list of adjoining property owners. Also enclosed is a check in the amount of $1,041.00 to cover all applicable filing fees. I would appreciate your putting this application on the docket for the next Planning Commission hearing which is October 7, 1997. If you have any questions or if I may be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to ask. Y s very truly, 1 ,~ 1 ~~ 0 ~ ~~~ Richard R. Sayers RRS\dak Enclosures cc: Jack F. rrs\Walrond\County.ll Walrond, Jr. ATTORNEYS 6~ COUNSELORS AT LAW • For StaK Use On/y: Case Number ::::::::~:':::=::::i:i: ~~ ~~: ~~~ ~`f~r~~t~.~:::(J~ ..................................................................................................:.............. Applicant Jack F. Walrond, Jr. The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the folle~:~ing questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. This rezoning would eliminate unnecessary restrictions on the property which were proffered prior to the adoption of the new zoning ordinance in 1992. The restrictions now discourage economic development activities which promote desirable employment and enlargement of the taa base. The property was zoned C-2 in 1992 by Roanoke County. The new ordinance supplants the old restrictions Therefore, removal of the proffers will enhance compliance with the current C-2 district. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanc:~ce County Comprehensive Plan. The property was orginally zoned B-2 and B-3 with the proffers. When the county adoopted the new zoning ordnance in 1992, the property was zoned C-2. The proffers are now unnecessary because the new C-2 ordinance addresses these requirements. . Please describe the impact(s) of the request on t..e Yropery itself, the adjoining properies, and the surrccnding area, as well as the impacts on public services anc facilities, including water/se~~~er, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. The property is currently restricted by proffers made obsolete by the new zoning ordinance. Removing the proffers will have minimal effect, if any, on adjoining properties, t•he surrounding areas and ezisting utilities and services. ' ,~ ~ PRIVATE Ig' SANITARY SEWER EASEMEIJT ~'~i OA ~- OB N 40 ° 30' 2~1" E ~ 13 I . l I' O~ y~ O -- cO N 8 5° o-t' I c°" E ~ c0o.7C0' ~,~ 0-`~ 5 52°04' SCn" E~ 42.29' OD -+OE N 82° 55' 04" E ~ 5.'T 1' ~~ OE -+OF N 38° 25' 27" E ~ 51.09' ~i O-i-O 5 51° 3d' 33" E ~ 3o.2(a' i~ 50' R/W 5 51° 34' 33" E- 291.45' ' 22:0.45 in p I G ~ X5.00 NEW I I SET LOT 2A eoNe. 0.93Cu 4C, ~ FS E I Iy PRI ATE 15' / - J SANITARY _/ 15 ' CoNG. SEWER C D 'o e~M•T / ~ / lz.~~' P11.1 SET Q ~ V W Q, ~ 4l.. C r ~ ~ N O 4'1.2' ^ 1.L ry~ I `ti y Ww~2 ~ ~" ~~ N ~ N Nm C N z ~ o ~~~o ~ ~ ~ ° 2J 1 CONC. Moll, z 40.14' Z1 N 35° 20' 19" E 5.9 5' P1 N 9eT 8 /~ CI NDE:R m Off/ ~ 3 ,,,,o K 50 1• BLOCK CAR I ~ WA'~N 1e' _ - ~ - I GILIDER ESt..oCK ~ ml BUILDIN4 o r. ~ - ~ m ~, ~~ NEW tr! '' coNC. II LINES Q ~ /I ~-- 123.Co4' 209-~ ~ N S I° 34' 33" W PIN 53C°°SI'44~~W I 6ET, 33•~O~ I oRIC~II.IAL LoT I I 2.044 n,C. A I 2 - ... I 3z.~~ N Ew pp CINDER BLDGI( LOT ZLJ y OFFICE BLDG. p 1.109 AG. ?~ S io2. O' 30 L l0 0' -9 ~hl 51° 34' 33" W P1N• r SET ono PIN 3 0 0 ~0~ O N ~ ~ r `~~ ~Q~7 3a a t7 ~j ? Y N ~Qo W lY OLO PIN "~, LOT 3 e. cunw~l, w ~ 1335 THIS PLAT OF SUBDIVISION IS SUBJECT TO INPORMATION WHICH p~S~ NAY 8E DISCLOSED BY A TITLE REPORT BY A LICENSED ATTORNEY. APPROVED: AGENT ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION DATE SURVEY FOR JACK WALROND SNOWING THE REDIVISION OF LOT 2~ PERIMETER • EAST COMMERCE CEI~ITERI PHASE = P.B. 10~ Phi. 113 AND CREATING I.IEW LOT 2A(o.g3Cn l~G.) Af~ID L1EW LoT 2B(I.-oBAC.) REYI9ED: JUNE 6, 1988 I-IOLLINS MAGISTERIAL D18TFZICT To SHOW IS' S.S.E. ; 51Gl.1 ~AVIRG NIAAUNTY sY: T. P. PARKER & SON SCALE: t'- C°O' CALL. D"gy"p DATE: MARCH 31 IS ENGINEERS 8, SURVEYORS ,LTD. _ CK'D. SALEM VIRGINIA W.O. 08-0409 p_ Q `L ~~ X02 , ~ I - ~~ i ire, I ~ ~ .D 2 \ ~ .. ~ T mot. -~,. X~r ='~ 1' ~ ` /,~.u -s ~c_ ,cGf;-: j _ \ I ___._,._ .... II ._ . - - i ~. __ _- .. _ _ i v _. I v I - r' ,p ~ " - -I- ' ~ i _ ! Oi I _i..o.2v it ~, it _ 8 ~: ,' S- .._.,------.~~.._. -ct -;~-.~_o~. 42,ou _.I i9'-o'~ I ~ :~`-o° lati - i~ou I. 30'-0" l _ -"~ ~! I I i I - `'i. ~j~' i ~ I ~,,.TL' v ~~•'~' __.__. V ~.~_. _ : =~y= -~ _ I I ~- _ ~ ~ o~"' i //j ~ . -~-_ r I I~ _ ~ ~ \ ~ : o. C -r -.~ • ~ ~ ~ E I ~ II .._ ... - _ ~ ----_ PROFFER OF CONDITIONS ~_ ~(1) All fuel storage within the distribution facilities will be underground, providing bottom loading service only. Tanks are to be buff hide-steel with fiberglass sealer. All corners of the storage areas are to be monitored with seepage detectors. (2) All truck storage areas as relates to Walrond Oil company are to be screened from vie~.~ from adjacent property owners, by landscaping, earth berm, f~:.zce or combination. (3) Retail facilities to be of sin;ilar des.igii to Texaco 2000 Outlet. Landscaping per concept plan. (4) Office design-to be i_n substantial conformity to concept plans and architectural description. ~5) Walrond Oi..1 Company, Inc. complex will be contained within B-2 and B-~ zoned areas as set forth on the concept plan. (6) Development of the entire tract will be within restrictions as proposed for Perimeter-East Commerce Park. (7) B-3 zoning to be restricted to .permitted uses under-Section _ 21-23-3 of the Roanoke County-Zoning: Ordinance - update August 4, 1986, to users defined under Paragraph 1 and 3. (8) B-2 zoning to exclude the following uses as set forth under Section 21-23-2 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance upda~e P_ugust 4, i 986, public bi 1liard -parlor and poolrooms, gol driving range, flea markets and public dance halls. (9) M-1 zoning to exclude the following uses as set forth unde.- Section 21-24-1 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance - update August 4, 1986, automotive repair, overha~~ling or service requiring outside storage of disabled vehicles, kennels ~•:~th exterior runs or yards, flea markets and mini-warehouses. (1~~ ) A 35 foot buffer strip shall be maintained between light industrial and adjacent Residential and Agricultural Districts. Buffers which abut residential home sites shall be planted with Evergreen trees, interspersed with decicuous trees as set forth in Section 21-92 General standards, Subsection E, - F, G of the Screening and Buffering ordinance of the County of Roanoke, as now adopted or as may hereafter be amended. (11 ) Middle curb cut to Lot 2 will _=provide=_f or vehicle ~ entrance-, : ~~ __ only from Route 460. -•-"' - ,_.~._ ~~`"~ (12) Lot r3 and n4 shall provide for shared access to the curb cut on Route 460. •.. ti i~ ~ ~, ~ \ rX - o.::~ x:~0` ^1, _..... ~o.4.Vok ~~ -- ~ ,moo :_,a,ss~„FYaTc~Ty....::::VICINITY MAP .~'° ~. __ ~N[IRTH . ~ ~, ,~ :==~. ,' ~ ` f ~ ~ J / ~ ,._ ~ ' '~ / / - - M ~ / ry c~Ty of ~~~ ~D~E 1 -~G ~;.~~ a 15t a~ PETlnocl~R: ~JAGK I-. WAL _ DEPAR~1VT OF PL}G 50.01-1-2.3 & 2..5 ~' AND ZONING ~~'~ !`lAP r~ ' ~ REMOVE. CONDITIONS ~ - -~ ~' ' ~QUcST ~. ~. _ - .~ ~" / i ~` _ i C; ,_ ~ ~' ~ a G~ ~~ / w~ 4 / J~ ~J r ~i k ~!~ For staff use only COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 5204 Bernard ter. P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 ( 540 772-2068 FAX (540) 772-2108 Proposed Zoning: C2 Proposed Land Use: Commercial date i received b applicatio f e• ClEZA dat-~, ~y /` placards issued: BOS date: Case Number: .y For StaN Use Only Use Type: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, wicth, and frontage requirements of the requested distric;? YES x NO IF NO, A VA=IANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for t`~e requested Use Type? YES x NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO _~_ ~~f;r~~~l~hF`F`~f-3~~?{'X~t'.'~'ltt7":~~sf~1`~~~~~~~~€~€€~€a€€~~`~~~s-€€~€a Variance of Section(s) THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v ws ' v x Consultation 8 1 /2" x 1 1" concept plan Application x-~" Metes and bounds description Justification x `~M--s Water and sewer application of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in orcar to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL N'OT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF ws v x Application fee ~` Proffers, if applicable x Adjoining property owners /hereby certify that / am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowled and consent of the owner. Owner's Signature: And son & Associates, Inc.-Agent for Lowes Companies Fg This rezoning request will further the purposes of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance by expanding the area of an existing commercial zone to provide for the development of a large retail commercial enterprise that will be consistent with the ongoing commercial development along this area of Route 220. This development will be located on an existing arterial transportation corridor that is necessary to support the scale of this project. There will be a significant economic benefit to the County in terms of employment and tax receipts from this proposed development, and the new Lowe's store will provide a convenient source of goods and services for the residents of south Roanoke County. This project will conform to the general guidelines of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. The purpose of this rezoning request is to provide sufficient site area to allow the development of the proposed retail store. The Comprehensive Plan recognized the Route 220 corridor area as a retail commercial zone. It is the desire of the developer and it is the purpose of the County that the site development regulations of the C-2, General Commercial Zoning District ensure the compatibility of this development with the adjacent land uses. This development will have a significant impact on the existing use of the Pinkard Court neighborhood. The developer will be acquiring all of the properties in the Pinkard Court Subdivison. The existing residential homes will be removed and the entire site will be developed for the Lowe's Store. The proposed development will necessitate upgrading and improving the water and sewer facilities for the site. This will be accomplished cooperation with Roanoke County. There will be new traffic entrances to the site from Route 220 and Valley Avenue. It is anticipated that a new traffic signal will be required at the intersection of Route 220 and Valley Avenue to provide safe ingress and egress to the project. This development will have no impact upon schools, parks and recreation, and fire and rescue services. The upgraded water service and the stores sprinkler system will enhance fire protection in this area of the county. Impacts to the adjoining properties will be minimized by the Site Development Regulations for the C-2 General Commercial District. There is an existing, mature vegetative screen and security fence between the Quail Valley Condominium and this site. The developer will provide additional screening and minimize the disturbance to the existing screening to minimize the visual impact and noise levels from this project upon the residents. The store will be constructed at an elevation that is significantly lower than that of the Condominiums. This will also limit the impact of this development upon the residents. There are three residential homes that adjoin the project on the west. Streets that are not publicly maintained serve these homes. This development will provide improved access to these properties. The screening and transitional setbacks required by the Site Development Regulations will be utilized to minimize the impact of this of this development upon these properties. The property to the north west of this project is undeveloped, wooded hillside and will not be affected by the development of this project. There are existing commercial enterprises along the northerly right of way line of Valley Avenue. These existing uses are consistent with and compliment the proposed zoning and use. These businesses will benefit from the improvements to streets, and utilities. _~ ,~~~\ F8 =~ ~% '~'"~'~~1~I c ~~ ~ c.' ._ ~~c „~~_ t- - ~~~ ~ , ~ ?ter I~~T ~~. YY~66Y ____ __ __ ~~ _ _ - ~~ _ ~~ '~, R i, ~ a - ~ . ,~ ~ ~. r,~ ~ ~ -- ~~ ~~ ~ _ 1 ~\ . T ~~ ' - - ~ ~ T-.'- ... A ~ ~~~ '~- ~ /'~ ~. 1 ' " ~' 7 n '~ _ _ ~ -/ r ~ ~G J } ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ j ~j - - ~~=e'..^o ['[ -! 111 .. / 4 ~ 1' j ~, t ~ 4 ~ -~~ ~ i tla r.~~- `-~ U~~ RourE 2?0, ' ~~,~ %/ ~ ;. ~ ~ . _ ~ i ~__~`; ~~ i ~ ~ ~ , ~ 1'-- s° EB~ ~ DR„w~ er /,~ ~ N 7 ~~ PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN CHECKED ~ ANEW STORE FACILITY FOR: J ,~,~D LOWE'S OF S. ROANOKE RQ4NOKE, NRG/NA ~~~~~: ~~~~ ~ 1 `ir %~. ,, ;; ~, 1 I III ~ I. 1 O\ i~ III ~ ~ ~ I .~I ~ ,. ~ ~ ~' I ~~ / II ;r;AII ~~ '!(//~~~~ ' ~~. ( ~~j ~~~ ~~i~~~,'~ill'~II ~ ~ ,,Y`~. ~ ~Il~ r~ '.I II I I I ~1~1, \ 'I~:~(u I i \ 11 1111 ~~ I1 ~ ~~,. 1~1~~ ~ '~~''' 1 111,.., ,~, I ~ I ~~~`~ I ~~1`111~~ I, 111 , \1, i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ , ~~_ ~~~ ~,~ ~ I ~, ~I ~ ~~~ \ ,,,~ , \ ~\ ~ , ~ _ R ~% \ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ \l~' ~ ~. \ g> l px ~~~~~ ~ ~~ggi~i II ~ / ~ ~ ~ ~~ 4 ~~ ~~' ~ ~ a ~~ g^ ^ 3~~ I , ,• , ~~~ ~ ~~ ~ l ~ ~~ k~ Lo,U~E'S ~~ r. o ..( ~~~~ ,~ . y%,,, ~ I q ~ O - _ ~~ A V a ~ .~ .`~ ~~{g F Jy` Q_ 3 SR_ ~ aAC Ce L g_c~-_ 8 ~.SaSa~~%fiZZyy^yG@ 9% - ^~f ~ /' ~ ti yd d QQ ~ ~ ~ ~ i { caete =d - 'YYM ale {SF~ a 9A- - - ~ { - \--~•'y i_ 3r ,_~~ ~xeM ~.~ ~- I- ° ~{'t~ e ~ p-,~ ~ ~'_~ e { e ~Y ~k ~'7 73 ' ~ t aa~~ a 13 ~ 0'~ ~ ig~~" cAa ' = ~ ,I ; b I . ; s - - ~ - - {RY~Y ~~ a h l --R s $~r ~ A ~.'~~ '+ __ ~ I a 1 ~ R I - _ _ ~ v ~~ ii \\ I I 8~~t' i 8a~~ - . :~e I _ R } _ _ _ _ _ _I^I ar $ b ~0 t 5 b~- _ L C N z S f~ - - J - _ .• - --.. F _ .-_ - A za- - .-..- --.._-- -_ ~o~~~ wr _ ~e a ~a~`a 11 $°8d3g'~lla. __ ~y\\ \~6\a I x s .. ;~-- - I ~a L3a~ Y' ~~ 5 { I I ~ ~~-•~l ail. _ - ,(~ .' _ ` `I z i U~ u I ~. j ale _' , _ ~_ + -#Y- i e - - 0~4~ _ "8_ id I _ I I R ~a ~ ~ I ~ ~ - - ..___..__. ' _ _~ .J U_(~. _ .f 2 Y ._I a I _ Ix~ V ' xl UFO '~'~ I~ I- 3,afY I I C a}gg a ~ -` Z5~ 9s~ ~ I -'_~~ ICJ 1 s d '-a' _ f - sa - - f - _ _ jig-= _~Y I ~. $ x _ '~• a f. 7 : y~o $ I s ~~ ~: -- --- - ~n+a ,~ zm e ~----------- + 0-Ai5 -p~.~.~, Y B ,~ s ~ 3Sat` ..I j S EI `2~ y3 ~~~ 23 aa~QO II ;3_s,a,. t, Jb 2~. •~ i~e a I / -I, ~~ I _ Set' 1. A-~ 3%F~ ^1 -~y I ~ _ - _ .~ 3 ° ae ~\, 3•~ a ° i ~~• . ds°a ~ I.,' ~~ - ia~ lycr I ~- I ~s... a I ~i'w= rcc»a . I~,- C ' a a•. t • ~ - 7..~ tf ~ RI: I -`a j~%8- ~ ;'F= °~ Sla ~q.s ~ ~I~ I~~$ jp g 7 // da~Jo.` ~ ~°3 11I $oti L _ _ ~ ~~ ~;~$y~ L li bbb6 ~ ~ \ /' 'I =~~- j Bare s sfa / ~/ a I } /74/ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~~~ / / I I• ~~~ Q9G ,C yb / - ~~ 'a alb 5 „ I bi ~ 7~ ;- ~ 1e ~ s' ,~ ~~3 rss 5 6.~ iRi I I ~ ~ ~Yj~g]( ~~'p~ ae4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7~Yi~~ig~ jj`j[ II p 'J1 ~gk Off[ ? 1a °4 ~ Yak `~ 'I li~lpo P RJK . (;U . U 11L1 I Y r-- ~ POAM ~F ~ 'V ~ J JaZ 188 UTILITY DEPARTMENT August 1 S, 1997 Lowe's.Comparues, Inc. 1203 School Street Wilkesboro, NC 28697 Dear Sir/Madam: Re: Availability No. 97-193 ..., . Lowe's Facility Pinkard Court Area Tax Map No. 77.20-1-42 and 43 87.08-01-03 through 69, 87.08-03-IO and 11 Water/Sewer Public water and sanitary sewer can be made available to the subject property. ~~ Public water currently exists within the subject property which is suitable for only domestic service with a maximum fire flow of approximately 500 gallons per minute (gpm). At the intersection of Valley Avenue and Booker Road, the static water pressure will fluctuate between 115 and 100 pounds per square inch (psi). Currently there is a limiting section of approximately I,000 feet of small domestic pipe in the water system supplying this property which will require upgrading to allow conunercial development ofthe subject property. A table providing connection fees per water meter size follows. The fee includes the connection to the main, meter box, setter and water meter at the property line. It is your responsibility to install the service lateral from the meter to the building under the provisions of the plumbing code. _ Sanitary sewer can be provided by connection to the sewer main along Route 220 adjacent to this property. The owner would be responsible for the complete installation of the sewer lateral from the building to the sewer main and cleanout at the public easemcndproperty line. You must verify that there is a minimum of two feet of fall from the building service elevation to the top of the sewer main. The Roanoke County Utility Department would make the actual connection to the sewer main after excavation and shoring per OSHA regulations by your contractor. To schedule the actual tap of the sewer mair>, you should contact the Roanoke County Utility Department two (2) working days prior to installation of the sewer lateral and excavation to the sewer main. Since this is a commercial facility, you will be required to complete and submit anon-residential sanitary sewer checklist (enclosed) prior to occupying the building and to install a sampling manhole on the sewer lateral. t 206 KESSLER MILL_ ROAD • SALEM, VIRGINIA 24153 • (540) 387-6104 . . ~ 4 ® PrtMoQ on Fi~cyt!•d Papa ,. t_r. AUG 21 ' 97 1 GI : 19 llth' I ~ tL ~ (U3-38 ~-6230 Hug L 1 y r 7AZ 'Zq7 ~7'2Gi lu~ul Ivo.uu.s r.U2 PAf;F A7 - ROK. CO. UTILITY DEPT. TEL~703-387-6230 • ~' • August 15; 1997 Page Three ffyou should have questions or need additional clarification of the above information, please call me at 3 87-6102. ~: Sincerely, • . .._.,. Robert C. Fronk, P.E. Utility Engineer RCF/sgh cc: Arnold Covey, Engineering Tim Gubala, Economic Development ~~ .. • ~~.• • ~ ~ '.ate( •.'. ~ !:'. . .~., ~Sxy. ~ ~ ' •t... •'i'.C1~.','~ t t - .. '.., ~ ~,r.M1~jfv~b`~r..j,'„ oi:i~, j•fy t'tiY~i~,~;~i~'ri:j';w'. Aug 21 97 10 03 No .003 P.04 ., ~/ v ~ ~',.'~ P/ :..tea.-~c~F -~CP~T .~~.t w- 'per.. ~ .'. / / ~ 1~ /~ 1 YO MYIUM Euu FAax ~~ ..ryq w PO~ ~t~S /~ '^ eEUn+t~t,'itr5 i ,. 419 d~~ a ^~., .,esce s ~ .:rar~u ~rvQr w~.o-. l rpittr J ~• J ~1.. ~~4 ~~ N o~ ~~t Qy~ • rrlM rw ..^AN~ <J `:+r ; ao 04 1541 ` 4~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~i 1 si...,:n a - 201 .:~, ~ ~ 4 ~ ~~% p 1' ( •rj::. . ~'OG..' .~~ I. I ASTOR AV. Y'.:.t,...•. M•: !.•, r 4h/I , t:. ~ •~~~.1' -~,C '~ rt ~ EDE(~17AYFl :r'.:r;/..R o t`IpRt ~i ~ p z p~•.~/v '• t" ~ l ,~~~~*ywt.W+b,VM1C~rll b'.:,t q .C'~•\~~~ T ! .L. ~ ~:...~"L'!-~ -- ---- --~ -v~I G i n~t i`T-'1Y1~A f' , ./ ~ ~~ NORTH ~ .- •~ ~ /. N, I Ij / , I I I_ -} '> ': ,F L i 7 LOWf'S .COMPANIES INC. ~" DEPARTMEIVrP OF PLANNII~'G ~ R=T,R=3 ~&~ C-ZC~ TO C-2 ~~ AND ZONING 87.08-1- :? . /. r. - .- COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 5204 Bernard Dr. P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 ( 540 772-2068 FAX 1540) 772-2108 ~- 9 For staff use only date rec ived:' re y: 12 application fee: PCi6ZA dare: ~ 7 I ~ placards issued: B 5 ate: 8~ . ~ ~. ~ Case Number: „_ !•O ~}!`f :~:~a Check type of application filed (check all that apply): D REZONING C~ SPECIAL USE OVARIANCE Applicant's name: Ohio State Cellular Phone Co.,Inc. Phone:312-864-3899 Address: dba United States Cellular Wireless Communict~ions Z;p Code: 60631 > > Owner's name: Phone: Address: Roanoke County Board Of Supervisors 540 772-2005 5204 Bernard Dr. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Zip Code: Location of property: Tax Map Number: 7,00-1-29 5585 Catawba Hospital Drive Magisterial District: Catawba Community Planning Area: Catawba Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: AR .89 acres Existing Land Use: Roanoke County Fire Station sq.ft. Proposed Zoning: AR / SUP For staff Use Gniy Proposed Land Use: use Type: 190ft Self Supporting Broadcast Tower Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES NO IF N0, A VAn1A~'VCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for tie requested Use Type? YES NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in crier to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v ws v ws v Consultation 8 1 /2" x 1 1 " concept plan Application fee Application ~~~ Metes and bounds description -.< Proffers, if applicable Justification ~~f Water and sewer application ,Adjoining property owners l hereby certify that l am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and cons~the o ~r~,er. Owner's Signature: --~~ /,G~._ ~><-ti, ~~.c C w~~ T / D ~ I ~ r \ ' ~ aw8a ar • 900 \ fATA ~6 R£$NE ~O TAB ~ EO a~ !/( ~~ sea !` • , RQ ` ` `` 1 'I9C° ~~ `1 Q ~ ~~ 77 '3q $e+oge .\ ip I O~sPosol ~ ?. ~~ ~~ 698 ~ ~ p 1 AF ,~ ~ 9 1- I `~ ~ CAT.~WdA ~~a2 J--- ' ~ f , .220~ooN ~? ~farnw8a , 1 ,• GLENVaR ~ , + 0 p \ ~ f9 I~ NORTN _ ~~ DEPARTMENT OF PLANIVIi~'G _' ~ AND ZONING • s ~.~~ ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~ _ ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 23, 1997 AGENDA ITEM: First Reading of Ordinance Authorizing the Construction of and Financing for a Local Public Works Improvement Project -Little Brushy Mountain Water Project COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: v Several residents in the Little Brushy Mountain area have petitioned Roanoke County for public water service. A portion of the area is currently provided with water via a privately owned waterworks serving 18 properties. The system is aging and has limited source capacity. The remaining residents not connected to the private waterworks obtain water from individual wells. Many well users have testified that they have poor water quality due to an objectionable level of hydrogen sulfide odors and/or iron in the well water. Residents of Little Brushy Mountain, and operators of the private waterworks in particular, have discussed the possibility of Roanoke County providing water service as early as September 1990. With the North Transmission line in close proximity, the project has become more feasible. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Roanoke County prepared a cost study for extending water service to this area. The estimated cost of construction is $780,000 to serve approximately 90 potential connections. This cost includes $105,000 participation by the Roanoke County Utility Department to provide for future expansion. This participation would be allocated to increasing the size of the water booster station, a portion of the water line and the 100,000 gallon water storage tank. Letters were mailed to property owners in the Little Brushy Mountain area on September 23, 1996. The purpose of these letters was to determine if a majority of the property owners were willing to pay $7,500 for water service. Of the 74 letters sent, 45 properties expressed interest. Should the project be approved, it is suggested that a special water service area be established for a period of a ten years that includes a fee structure for recovering the construction costs of the water line as properties are connected. The special connection fee for properties that connect at a later date would include a construction cost of $7,500 and the off-site facility fee in effect at the time of connection (presently $2,690). For initial participants that request financing, it is recommended that the amount to be financed be limited to $3,750. FISCAL IMPACT: If approved, the construction cost would be $780,000. Funding would be provided as follows: Property Owners $337,500 Public Works Participation Fund 337,500 Roanoke County Utility Fund 105,000 TOTAL $780,000 Any citizen participation under the ten-year payment provision will be advanced as a loan from the water fund. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff feels that public water is needed in this neighborhood. Staff recommends that the project be approved and that the attached ordinance be adopted after the second reading on October 14, 1997 if a minimum of 40 property owners commit to the project. SUBMITTED BY: ~ ~~ Gary Robert on, P.E. Utility Director ACTION Approved () Motion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to APPROVED: ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Eddy Harrison Johnson Minnix Nickens VOTE No Yes Abs r'~ -~ SPECIAL WATER SERVICE AREA ~~~ ~1 \N.~~R SKYVIEW ROAD "-9~©\" %~ CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ~~~~ / ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA ~ EXIT #137 ~~o LITTLE BRUSHY MOUNTAIN //~ WATER SYSTEM PROJECT 1 " = 600' SEPTEMBER 16, 1997 ~- I AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 1997 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CREATION OF AND FINANCING FOR A LOCAL PUBLIC WORKS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, LITTLE BRUSHY MOUNTAIN WATER PROJECT WHEREAS, Ordinance 112288-7 authorizes the financing of local public works improvements and the imposition of special assessments upon abutting property owners upon the adoption of an appropriate ordinance by the Board of Supervisors; and WHEREAS, the County Administration has negotiated the extension of the public water system to the Little Brushy Mountain Community; and WHEREAS, the extension of the public water system and the creation of a special utility (water) service area will alleviate a critical public health and safety problem; and WHEREAS, several of the residents have requested that the County allow them to pay their portion of the costs of connection to the public water system over ten years in accordance with the provisions of Ordinance 112288-7; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this Ordinance was held on September 23, 1997, and the second reading was held October 14, 1997; and BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the authority of Ordinance 112288-7, the Board authorizes and approves a local public works improvement project, namely, public water extension for a portion of the Little Brushy C:\OFFICE\WPWIN\WPDOCS~AGENDA~UTILITY\MTHEIGHT.WPD 1 G-~ Mountain Community. The total construction cost of this public water project is estimated to be $780,000, to be initially financed as follows: Citizen Participation $337,500 Advance from Public Works Participation Fund 337,500 Roanoke County Utility Fund 105,000 Total $780,000 That there is hereby appropriated for this project the sum of $337,500 from the Public Works Participation Fund (which was established by the Board of Supervisors on July 23, 1996). Any citizen participation under paragraph 3. will be advanced as a loan from the Water Fund. 2. That the "Project Service Area" is shown and designated on the attached plat entitled "Little Brushy Mountain Water System Project" prepared by the Roanoke County Utility Department, dated September 16, 1997, and identified as Exhibit 1. The Little Brushy Mountain Water Project Area is created for a period of ten years. Any owner of real estate within this service area may participate in and benefit from the public water extension to this service area by paying the sum of $7,500 toward construction costs which includes the off-site facility fees applicable at the time of connection (presently $2,690), said costs to be paid in full and in advance of connection to the public water extension. 3. That the Board authorizes and approves the payment by the property owners in the project service area who elect to participate on or before January 14, 1998, of their a portion of the cost of extending C:\OFFICE\WPWIN\WPDOCS\AGENDA\UTILITY\MTHEIGHT.WPD 2 G- i the public water system to their properties in accordance with the following terms and conditions: (a) Payment of $3,750 as a down payment per property owner/residential connection and payment of the remaining $3,750 to be financed for a maximum of 10 years at an interest rate of 8% percent per annum. (b) Property owners agree to execute a promissory note or such other instrument as the County may require to secure this installment debt. (c) Property owners further agree to execute such lien document or instrument as may be required by the County; said lien document or instrument to be recorded in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County. This lien instrument or document shall secure the repayment of the promissory note by the property owners to the County and shall be a lien against the property of the owners. Property owners also agree to pay the County any Clerk's fees or recordation costs which may be required to record any lien instrument or documents in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court. 4. That the payment by citizens in the project service area who elect to participate shall be made to the various funds as follows: The off-site facility fee shall be returned to the Water Fund, and payment of the construction costs shall be returned to the Public Works Participation Fund until such time as the advance has been repaid. C:\OFFICE\WPWIN\WPDOCS\AGENDA\UTILITY\MTHEIGHT.WPD 3 ~-i 5. That the County Administrator is authorized to take such actions and execute such documents as may be necessary to accomplish the purposes of this transaction, all upon form approved by the County Attorney. 6. That this Ordinance shall take effect on and from the date of its adoption. C:\OFFICE\WPWIN\WPDOCS\AGENDA\UTILITY\MTHEIGHT.WPD 4 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 23, 1997 AGENDA ITEM: First reading of ordinance authorizing the donation by lease of office space in the Roanoke County Administration Center to the Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission S~QUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : v~~a-w~ /J ^/ BACKGROUND: The Greenway Commission was formed in 1997 and consists of representatives from the County of Roanoke, City of Roanoke, City of Salem and the Town of Vinton. The Greenway Coordinator, a position partially funded by these localities, has had office space in the Fifth Planning District Commission offices since 1996. After careful review, it appears that the Greenway Commission can incur substantial cost savings (in the range of 20-25%) by relocating their office to the Roanoke County Administration Center. These savings could then be allocated to greenway projects. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION• The proposed lease, attached to this report, provides office space to the Greenway Coordinator, and authorizes the County to act as their fiscal agent and to provide payroll and procurement services at no cost to the Greenway Commission. The Commission will be responsible for its own budget including the Coordinator's salary and benefits and other operating expenses such as telephone, duplicating and postage charges. The proposed lease would become effective on October 1, 1997. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of the proposed ordinance following second reading on October 14, 1997. ~-a 2 Respectfully Submitted, / ~ -~~z~ Ja et Scheid, Planner Department of Planning and Zoning Approve Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Eddy Harrison Johnson Minnix Nickens Vote No Yes Abs ~- D ~ ~ U ~ 9/18/97 U U 3:30 p.m. THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 1st day of October, 1997, by and between the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, (hereinafter referred to as "County") and the ROANOKE VALLEY GREENWAY COMMISSION (hereinafter referred to as "Commission"). W I T N E S S E T H That for and in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants contained herein, the parties hereby agree as follows: 1. County agrees to serve as fiscal agent for the Commission, to receive and expend funds, and to keep appropriate records. 2. County agrees to provide payroll and other employee services and benefits for the Commission Coordinator consistent with County policies applicable to County employees, except the provisions of the grievance procedure shall not be available to the members and employees of the Commission. 3. County agrees to provide procurement services for the Commission consistent with County Code and policies. 4. County agrees to provide a minimal level of clerical staff support, as available, for the Commission, recognizing that volunteers will be used when possible. 5. County agrees to allow the Commission to use property owned by County and further described as square feet of office space located at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive C:\OFFICE\WPWIN\WPDOCS\AGRMTS\GREENWAY.LSE 1 ~- a for office space in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this agreement. Commission is authorized to use the off-street parking spaces adjacent to the structure. 6. County agrees to provide basic office furniture, a computer, and a telephone instrument. 7. The term of this agreement shall be three years, said term to commence October 1, 1997, and to continue until September 30, 2001. This agreement may be canceled or terminated by either party upon two (2) month's notice in writing or any date that may be mutually agreed upon. 8. County will maintain the property described in paragraph 5, above, and provide janitorial services similar to the quality and level of services provided to other, similar County facilities. 9. Commission has examined and knows the condition of the premises and has received same in good order and repair, and that no representation as to the condition or repair thereof has been made by the County prior to or at the execution of this agreement that are not expressed herein. The premises shall be returned to County at the expiration of this agreement in such good condition and state of repair, order wear and tear allowed for. Commission shall be responsible for the safety and security of the leased premises. In an emergency it shall be the responsibility of the Commission to notify either the Roanoke County Police Department or the Roanoke County Department of General Services, as appropriate. 10. During the term of this agreement, County will provide and pay C:\OFFICE\WPWIN\WPDOCS\AGRMTS\GREENWAY.LSE 2 ~.-a' for all utilities (water, sewer, electric, and solid waste services) which may be necessary to the Commission for the reasonable and proper use and enjoyment of the premises by the Commission. In addition, the County shall allow the Commission to use conference rooms and meeting facilities and storage space for equipment and files on the premises on a space available basis. Commission may use County office equipment, such as copiers, fax machines, telephones and other office support equipment, if temporarily available and not required for any governmental purposes. The availability of conference rooms, meeting facilities or office equipment is solely within the discretion of the County. Commission shall be responsible for its long distance telephone billings and charges. 11. This agreement represents the entire understanding between the parties and may not be modified or changed except by written instrument executed by the parties. 12. This agreement shall not be assigned by the Commission without the express, written approval of the County. WITNESS the following signatures and seals: By ROANOKE VALLEY GREENWAY COMMISSION Lee B. Eddy Chairman C:\OFFICE\WPWIN\WPDOCS\,4GRMTS\GREENWAY.LSE 3 G-~- Approved as to form: Paul M. Mahoney Roanoke County Attorney State of Virginia, County of Roanoke, to-wit: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA By Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 1997, by Lee B. Eddy, Chairman, on behalf of the Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission. My commission expires: State of Virginia, County of Roanoke, to-wit: Notary Public The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 1997, by Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County. Notary Public My commission expires: C:\OFFICE\WPWIN\WPDOCSWGRMTS\GREENWAY.LSE 4 ~.-a AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 1997 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT AND THE DONATION BY LEASE OF OFFICE SPACE IN THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER TO THE ROANOKE VALLEY GREENWAY COMMISSION WHEREAS, Ordinance 040897-6 authorized execution of an intergovernmental agreement establishing the Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission between the City of Roanoke, the City of Salem, the County of Roanoke, and the Town of Vinton pursuant to Section 15.1-21 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and WHEREAS, Section 15.1-21 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, further provides authority for any political subdivision entering into such an agreement pursuant to this State Code section to "supply ... such property, personnel or services therefor as may be within its legal power to furnish" to this intergovernmental commission; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 16.01 of the Roanoke County Charter, the Board of Supervisors has determined that certain office space in the Roanoke County Administration Center is temporarily surplus and available for other public uses, and that the donation by lease of this office space to the Commission will serve other public uses; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading of this ordinance was held on September 23, 1997; and the second reading was held on October 14, 1997. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, C:\OFFICE\WPWIN\WPDOCS\AGENDA\REALESTIGREENWAY.LSE 1 ~_a, Virginia, as follows: 1. That it is in the County's best interests to enter into an agreement to document the working relationship between the County and the Commission and to provide for the donation by lease of office space to the Commission in the Roanoke County Administration Center. 2. That the County Administrator is authorized to negotiate and to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the purposes of this transaction, all of which shall be upon a form approved by the County Attorney. 3. That this ordinance shall be effective from and after the date of its adoption. C:\OFFICE\WPWIN\WPDOCS\AGENDA\REALEST\GREENWAY.LSE 2 ~-/ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 1997 ORDINANCE 092397-5 AUTHORIZING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF AN EXISTING 20-FOOT SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT ACROSS LOT 4, BLOCK 4, SECTION NO. 2 OF HOLLINS GARDENS WHEREAS, by subdivision plat entitled "Plat of Section No. 2 HOLLINS GARDENS", dated October 1, 1959 and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Plat Book 4, page 37, Dalton O., J. E., and J. D. Oyler, dedicated to public use a sanitary sewer easement, twenty feet (20') in width, across certain lots in the subdivision, including Lot 4, Block 4; and, WHEREAS, the petitioners, Jimmie R. Hollandsworth and Dorothy P. Hollandsworth, husband and wife, are the owners of Lot 4 and the easterly 10 feet of Lot 3, Block 4, Section No. 2 of Hollins Gardens, and designated on the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map No. 27.11-4-55; and, WHEREAS, a recent survey of said property reflects that the residential dwelling located thereon encroaches upon the west side of the existing 20' sanitary sewer easement; and, WHEREAS, the petitioners have requested that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, vacate a portion of the sanitary sewer easement; and, WHEREAS, by deed of easement dated June 6, 1996, and recorded in Deed Book 1532, page 1336, the petitioners have granted to the Board of Supervisors of County of Roanoke a new sanitary sewer easement across Lot 4, Block 4; and, 1 WHEREAS, the sum of $2,175.98 has been deposited with the Utility Department to cover the costs for relocation of the line and easement in order to meet the requirements of the Utility Department; and, WHEREAS, §15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by §15.1-431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and first reading of this ordinance was held on September 9, 1997; and the public hearing and second reading of this ordinance was held on September 23, 1997. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That a portion of the 20' sanitary sewer easement across property owned by Jimmie R. Hollandsworth and Dorothy P. Hollandsworth, husband and wife, shown cross-hatched and designated as "EX. 20' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT (P.B. 4, PG. 37)(TO BE VACATED)" upon the 'Plat Showing New Sanitary Sewer Easement Being Granted to the County of Roanoke by Jimmie R. Hollandsworth & Dorothy P. Hollandsworth' dated 23 February 1996, made by Lumsden Associates, P.C., a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, be, and hereby is, vacated; and, 2. That, as a condition to the adoption of this ordinance, all costs and expenses associated herewith, including but not limited to, sewer line relocation costs, publication costs, survey costs and recordation of documents, shall be the responsibility of 2 the petitioners, Jimmie R. Hollandsworth and Dorothy P. Hollandsworth, or their successors or assigns; and, 3. That the County Administrator, or an Assistant County Administrator, is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish this vacation, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 4. That this ordinance shall be effective on the date of its adoption, and a certified copy of this ordinance shall be recorded in the Clerk's Office the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in accordance with Section 15.1-482(b) of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended). On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board cc: File Arnold Covey, Engineering and Inspections Terry Harrington, Planning and Zoning John Birckhead, Real Estate Assessment Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Gary Robertson, Utility Director 3 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER~T AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 23, 1997 AGENDA ITEM: Second Reading of Ordinance for Authorization to Vacate a Portion of an Existing 20-Foot Sewer Line Easement across Lot 4, Block 4, Section 2 of Hollins Gardens: Tax Parcel No. 27.11-4-55 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: As construction drawings were being prepared for replacement of the Carvins Creek Interceptor, it was discovered that a rock wall and wood deck encroached on the existing sewer easement. In lieu of removing the structures the owners of the property requested that the sewer line and easement be relocated and agreed to pay $2,175.98 for the additional costs related to changing the location. The sewer line has since been replaced and a new easement has been obtained and recorded in D.B. 1532 pg. 1336. The property owners are now requesting that a portion of the original easement as recorded in P.B. 4, pg. 37 be vacated as shown on the attached plat prepared by Lumsden Associates dated 23 February 1996. This vacation will allow the subject property to be free of physical encumbrances over the sewer line FISCAL IMPACT: There is no significant fiscal impact associated with this action as the property owners have paid all additional costs associated with the relocation of the sewer line. ~-i STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt the attached ordinance after the second reading, and that the referenced easement be vacated as it is no longer a benefit to Roanoke County. The sewer line that was located in the original easement has since been abandoned. SUBMITTED BY: Gary Robei~on, P.E. Utility Direc or Approved () Motion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred APPROVED: ~u-- Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs to Eddy _ _ _ Harrison _ Johnson _ _ _ Minnix _ _ _ Nickens . , EgHIBIT A EX. FRAME SFIED-~ TAX +27.00-1-2 PROPERTY OF T HOLUNS COLLEGE CORPORATION D.D. 831, PC. 519 ~p,,~ R, O1 110 , t1~' ~ ~ ~~ N TAX X27.11-4-55 e~ v PROPERTY OF c a JIMMIE R. HOLLOANDSWOA z ~ si DOROTHY P. HOLLANDSW ~ m s D.B. 1478, PG, 1794 ~~ ~ s OLD DEED EX, RCCK WALL ~ '~ ~ s LINE GOD ~ ? DECK EX. W W s T S ~ .o, 1 ' s ~ ° ~ MINIMUM EX 30 EX' DfyCK k ~ s BUILDING LINE AME p1yELL1NG LOT 3, BLOCK 4 s ffi SECTION No. 2 ` s 'HGLL!NS CARCENS' i ~'~ P.B. 4, PG. J7 ~ ~ ~ Ex. 20' SANITARY SEWER ~D ~~~~.~~ `, EASEMENT (P.B, 4, PC, J7} ~~ s (TO BE vaCATED) ''~ ` EX BRICK WALL a EX 10' X ID' GUY ` _ ANCHOR EASEMENT ~ ` - 12g (P,B. 4, PG. 37) S 81.37'12' W / EX. CURB k GUTIER 'r aEET 1~ CENTERLINE EXISTING ` CARVINS CREEK . /~ ~ I ~~ L ~1 ~;.:.''•~ d. ..1 o. NEW 20' . ~ SANITARY ' ,1 1 SEWER ~-~- EX PAVED DRIVE .~ EASEMENT , •~ ~\ . ~ , ~ ~~ ~-"'~ 2 ~~ ~ .r..~, :~. p j'": ;.:~ 12 SOT AL) I c-, pEyTON SRRE~121 A= 2'17'37' S0' AIw ~VA• SEC. `- a= 2so.aD T= 5.00 j- ~r L* 10.01 .~~ BRC. S 80'28'23 W CHD. 10.01 NG1ES: 1. THIS PUT IS FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF CREArNC A SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT AS SHOWN HERECM AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACTUAL BOUNDARY SURVEY. 2. THIS PUT WAS PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE REPORT PREPARED BY MARTIN, HOPKINS >k LEMON, P.C. DATED 23 JANUARY 1996. J. TOTAL AREA OF NEW SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT ^ J89 S.F. 4. THE NEW EASEMENT A5 SHOWM HEREON IS AFFECTED BY THE FOLLOWING ENCUMBRANCE: A. 20' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT , P.B. 4, PG. 37 (TO BE VACATED}. 5. THE NEW EASEMENT AS SHOWN HEREON IS NOT AFFECTED BY THE FOlLOVANC ENCUMBRANCE: A. 10' X 10' GUY ANCHOR EASEMENT, P.B. 4, PG. 37. y ~ PHILL{P A. 7 AR tN a. ~~ NEW 20' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT UNE 1-2 DIRECTION S 12'731 E DISTANCE 107.43 2-J S 33'G6'00 w 19.77 3-4 S 81'37'12 W 26.70' i 4-5 N 33'06 00 E 29.71 5-6 N 1213 7 W 96.22 6-i N 69'3812 E 20.20 TOTAL AREA ^ 2,525 S.F. PLAT SHOWING NEW SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT LEGEND P.B. PLAT BDOK EX. EXISTING D.B. DEED 8CK)K PG. PAG£ ' a NEW SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT S. F, SCIUARE FEET BcING GRANTED TO THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE BY ' JIMMIE R. HOLLANDSWORTH & DOROTHY P. HOLLANDSWORTH ACROSS TAX y27,TT-4-55 SCALE: 1" s 3C}' DATE: 23 FEBRUARY 199b LUMSDEN ASSOCIATES, P. C. ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS-PLANNERS ROANOKE. VIRGINIA /f - ! AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 1997 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF AN EXISTING 20-FOOT SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT ACROSS LOT 4, BLOCK 4, SECTION NO. 2 OF HOLLINS GARDENS WHEREAS, by subdivision plat entitled "Plat of Section No. 2 HOLLINS GARDENS", dated October 1, 1959 and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Plat Book 4, page 37, Dalton O., J. E., and J. D. Oyler, dedicated to public use a sanitary sewer easement, twenty feet (20') in width, across certain lots in the subdivision, including Lot 4, Block 4; and, WHEREAS, the petitioners, Jimmie R. Hollandsworth and Dorothy P. Hollandsworth, husband and wife, are the owners of Lot 4 and the easterly 10 feet of Lot 3, Block 4, Section No. 2 of Hollins Gardens, and designated on the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map No. 27.11-4-55; and, WHEREAS, a recent survey of said property reflects that the residential dwelling located thereon encroaches upon the west side of the existing 20' sanitary sewer easement; and, WHEREAS, the petitioners have requested that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, vacate a portion of the sanitary sewer easement; and, WHEREAS, by deed of easement dated June 6, 1996, and recorded in Deed Book 1532, page 1336, the petitioners have granted to the Board of Supervisors of County of Roanoke a new sanitary sewer easement across Lot 4, Block 4; and, f~-/ WHEREAS, the sum of $2,175.98 has been deposited with the Utility Department to cover the costs for relocation of the line and easement in order to meet the requirements of the Utility Department; and, WHEREAS, § 15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by §15.1-431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and first reading of this ordinance was held on September 9, 1997; and the public hearing and second reading of this ordinance was held on September 23, 1997. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That a portion of the 20' sanitary sewer easement across property owned by Jimmie R. Hollandsworth and Dorothy P. Hollandsworth, husband and wife, shown cross- hatched and designated as "EX. 20' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT (P.B. 4, PG. 37) (TO BE VACATED)" upon the 'Plat Showing New Sanitary Sewer Easement Being Granted to the County of Roanoke by Jimmie R. Hollandsworth & Dorothy P. Hollandsworth' dated 23 February 1996, made by Lumsden Associates, P.C., a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, be, and hereby is, vacated; and, 2. That, as a condition to the adoption of this ordinance, all costs and expenses associated herewith, including but not limited to, sewer line relocation costs, publication costs, survey costs and recordation of documents, shall be the responsibility of the 2 ~-/ petitioners, Jimmie R. Hollandsworth and Dorothy P. Hollandsworth, or their successors or assigns; and, 3. That the County Administrator, or an Assistant County Administrator, is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish this vacation, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 4. That this ordinance shall be effective on the date of its adoption, and a certified copy of this ordinance shall be recorded in the Clerk's Office the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in accordance with Section 15.1-482 (b) of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended). c:\•. • •\agenda\esm ts.w&s\hollands.ord 3 ~- 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 1997 ORDINANCE 092397-6 AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO GRANT THE RIGHT TO USE A COUNTY WATER LINE EASEMENT FOR PRIVATE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE BY CICERO H. HALL, JR. AND DORIS B. HALL WHEREAS, John M. Oakey, Inc., a Virginia corporation, is the owner of a certain parcel of land (Tax Map No. 112-(2)-B) on Alternate Route #220 located partially in the County of Roanoke and partially in the County of Botetourt, Virginia; and, WHEREAS, Roanoke County has an existing 20' water line easement running along the southern boundary line of the Oakey parcel granted by easement document dated February 8, 1990 of record in Deed Book 1320 at page 352; and, WHEREAS, Cicero H. Hall, Jr. and Doris B. Hall are the owners of a certain parcel of land (Tax Map No. 112-(2)-C) located east of and adjacent to the Oakey property, and the Halls need to acquire a 10' private sewer easement within the public easement in order to provide service to their property; and, WHEREAS, the proposed private easement does not conflict with the present or proposed County use of the existing water line easement; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading of this ordinance was held on September 9, 1997; and a second reading was held on September 23, 1997. THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the 1 County of Roanoke, Virginia as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject private easement does not conflict with the specified public use of the easement, the form of the real estate interest in the subject water line easement renders it unacceptable and unavailable for other public uses, and and is hereby declared to be surplus; and, 2. That conveyance Cicero H. Hall, Jr. and Doris B. Hall of a 10' private sanitary sewer easement within the existing 20' water line easement, as shown upon the plat dated June 2, 1997, made by Shanks Associates, P.C., a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby authorized. 3. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as may be necessary to accomplish the conveyance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board 2 cc: File Arnold Covey, Engineering and Inspection Terry Harrington, Planning and Zoning John Birckhead, Real Estate Assessments Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Gary Robertson, Utility Director 3 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 23, 1997 AGENDA ITEM: Second Reading of Ordinance to Allow a Portion of a Private Sanitary Sewer Easement to Overlap a 20-Foot Wide Water Line Easement for Cicero H. Hall and Doris B. Hall. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Roanoke County maintains a 20-foot wide water line easement along the southern boundary line of property owned by John M. Oakey, Inc. The easement was acquired February 8, 1990 and is recorded in Deed Book 1320, page 352. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: John M. Oakey, Inc. is in the process of granting a 10-foot wide private sanitary sewer easement to the adjacent property owners. In an effort to minimize the amount of encumbered property, John M. Oakey, Inc. has requested that a portion of the 10-foot wide private sanitary sewer easement overlap Roanoke County's existing 20-foot wide water line easement. The attached plat shows 5 feet of the sewer easement overlapping the water line easement. The easement document states that the proposed sewer line will maintain a 10-foot horizontal separation from the existing water line at all points in the easement. This request has no fiscal impact on Roanoke County. ~{-a STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The 10-foot separation between the sewer line and water line provides adequate protection to Roanoke County. Staff, therefore, recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt the attached ordinance after the second reading that the County Administrator be authorized to execute the attached easement document following the second reading of the ordinance. SUBMITTED BY: Gary Robert n, P.E. Utility Director APPROVED: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION Approved () Motion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Harrison Johnson Minnix _ Nickens ~-a Prepared by Martin, Hopkins & Lemon P. O. Box 13366 Roanoke, Virginia 24033 THIS DEED OF EASEMENT, made this day of 1997, by and between JOHN M. OAREY, INC., a Virginia corporation ("Grantor", or collectively if more than one, "Grantor"); CICERO H. HALL, JR. AND DORIS B. HALL ("Grantee" or collectively if more than one, "Grantee"); the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANORE COUNTY, VIRGINIA ("Easement Holder 1"); and CICERO H. HALL, JR. AND DORIS B. HALL AND JEFFREY L. MAYHEW AND TERRI L. MAYHEW (collectively "Easement Holder 2"). W I T N E S S E T H That for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00), paid in hand at and with the execution and delivery of this Deed of Easement, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt, adequacy and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Grantor does hereby GRANT and CONVEY unto the Grantee, their heirs, successors and assigns, the following described easement, to-wit: A perpetual, non exclusive RIGHT and EASEMENT, Ten feet (10') in width, to construct, install, improve, operate, inspect, use, maintain, and repair or replace a sanitary sewer line upon, over, under, and across a tract or parcel of land belonging to the Grantor, acquired by deed dated and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book page and recorded in the Clerk's r~. 1 /~- ~ Office of the Circuit Court of Botetourt County, Virginia, in Deed Book page (the "Property"). The location of said easement is more particularly described on the plat attached hereto as "Exhibit A" and by this reference made a part hereof (the "Plat"). The Grantee agrees to restore and repair any damage to Grantor's Property which may be caused by the construction, reconstruction, use, or maintenance of said project. Grantee and their successors and assigns, covenant and agree to indemnify and hold Grantor, its successors and assigns harmless from and against any and all claims or damages which might arise or be asserted against Grantor, its successors and assigns, resulting from the construction, reconstruction, use, maintenance or lack of maintenance of the aforesaid easement. Grantee also covenants .and agrees that any sanitary sewer line constructed in the aforesaid easement shall be no less than ten (10') feet from the water line installed in Third Party Easement 1, hereinafter defined. The aforesaid easement shall be for the benefit of, and only of, Grantees' property designated as Botetourt County Tax Parcel No. 112-(2)-C (the "Benefitted Property"). WHEREAS, Easement Holder 1 by Deed of Easement dated February 8, 1990, and recorded in aforesaid Roanoke County Clerk's Office in Deed Book 1320, page 352, acquired a water line easement (the "Third Party Easement 1") over and across the Property; and, ~'. 2 i .. ~{-a WHEREAS, the easement herein granted to the Grantee runs over, upon, under, and across a portion of the Third Party Easement 1; and, WHEREAS, it is the=-desire of Easement Holder 1 to evidence its consent to the grant of the easement herein granted to the Grantee. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten r Dollars ($10.00), paid in hand at and with the execution and delivery of this Deed of Easement, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt, adequacy and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged,. Easement Holder 1 does hereby GRANT, RELEASE, and CONVEY unto the Grantee the easement herein granted in accordance with the terms and covenants contained in this Deed of Easement, in the area and to the extent that said easement runs over, upon, under, or across the Third Party Easement 1. The parties agree that said Third Party Easement 1 shall, in all other respects, remain in full force and effect. WHEREAS, Easement Holder 2 in accordance with a plat of record recorded in the aforesaid Botetourt County Clerk's Office in Plat Book 12, page 181, acquired a right-of-way for ingress and egress (the "Third Party Easement 2") over and across the Property; and, ~tix~ 3 ~: ~- ~- WHEREAS, the easement herein granted to the Grantee runs over, upon, under, and across a portion of the Third Party Easement 2; and, WHEREAS, it is the-d.~sire of Easement Holder 2 to evidence their consent to the grant of the easement herein granted to the Grantee. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00), paid in hand at and with the execution and delivery of this Deed of Easement, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt, adequacy and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Easement Holder 2 does hereby GRANT, RELEASE, and CONVEY unto the Grantee the easement herein granted in accordance with the terms and covenants contained in this Deed of Easement, in the area and to the extent that said easement runs over, upon, under, or across the Third Party Easement 2. The parties agree that said Third Party Easement 2 shall, in all other respects, remain in full force and effect. The grant and provision of this Deed of Easement shall constitute a covenant running with the land for the benefit of the Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. "~~ 4 ~-a To have and to hold unto the Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. WITNESS the following signatures and seals: GRANTOR: JOHN M. OAKEY, INC., a Virginia corporation By Title VI 2~S 1 [CORPORATE SEAL] STATE OF _ V ~t~c ,,.;A- COUNTY//CITY OF 1(~c~~,,,~,,~ to-wit: C~ L,u,The foregoing 'nstrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 1997, by Sa,•,~. Oak. P,•• ~ o„~- behalf of JOHN M. OAKEY, INC. , a Virginia corpora ion. `~" ~ Notary Public .~~[ ~e¢rissiGn E];~Z;r~s Cc~6er. 3l~ 1997 My'commission expires: +aa 5 ~- GRANTEE: ~~~iC!/1~(~ ~ ~~~Q~:~,,, Tom/ !SEAL ) __ Cicero H. Hall, Jr. ~~ SEAL) Doris B. Hall STATE OF ///~ ,, COUNTY/GAY OF -/~~~/~l//f~ , t0-wlt: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ~~ r~e_ , 1997, by CICERO H. HALL, JR. AND DORIS B. HALL. l Notary P blic My commission expires: / `~Q-~Q~J~ ~~, 6 N-~ EASEMENT HOLDER 1: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA STATE OF VIRGINIA, -- By: (SEAL) Elmer C. Hodge COUNTY/CITY OF ROANOKE, to-wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 1997, by Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator, on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. Notary Public My commission expires: ~; 7 ~~ EASEMENT HOLDER 2: ~ / ~~`~- 7~ SEAL) Cicero H. Hall, Jr. STATE OF ~. ~-- COUNTY/e~`Y of ~ // r , to-wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ ~ day of ~Tu n ~ , 1997, by CICERO H. HALL, JR. AND DORIS B. HALL. Notary Public My commission expires : _ 9- 3©- a~~ STATE OF V _' .~ COUNTY/CITY OF ~/?~i~~lCe , to-wit: The foregoin_ instrument was acknowledged before me this ~_ day of ~.~,~~ , 1997, by JEFFREY L. MAYHEW AND TERRIL/j,! MAYHEW. Notary Public My commission expires: ( SEAL ) Doris B. Hall ~AL ) J ffr y L. Mayhew (SEAL ) Terri L. Mayhe A I C-1 994.99" 437.25" 222.21" 4.3.3.74' N 1954b3" W 2570'49" ~ C/C£RO N. ~A: do DOR/S B. HALL D.B. 2BJ PG ?B? • TAX PARCEL _ 112-(2)-C 20. J2' /PF S 28 4127" E 296.94' /~~ ?0' R/W ~ 20.04' ~PB. l2 Py. fe1 ~ ~~ /PF ~ ~ ~ ~~a~~ ~ ~a ~ GENERAL NOTES• 9 ~ j~~4 /P1PEF O r. cocAnervs sr+orw 7~ Au unaA~v cvaao-nulovrs AAC' 7cpj 1 ~ ~ 79.41' i~a tae ~ wT~m~o cxv~vcss~ r rzie ( ~ ,!h 2 CQUVTY UNf AS 9YOIM( BAS1~D ON IUOT PIPQECT N ! -m MGt 62110-Q?D--FO7, C-307. ~ ' Q .z »,~ sva.~Cr PRC~ivTr, As gro~rv ~cH, rs rNe sA,v£ NE{Y ~ 1 ~ lamer. ~ar~is ~~ r ~ Rcc~a~vns ~ T£s 1p S'4N SEI~FR ' 1 tp . AS 9pMN MEIPEQV .VOE' busm Av A CUN4£NT rzEZD S7bPY£Y. EASEMENT ~ ~ o' 5.1 1 ~ 5-~~~1-- CENTE7~L/N ~ E pf- ~ ~ / EASEMENT ~ TAX PARCEL 112-(2)-B ~'i ~ ~ 4.188 ACRES ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ . . b~, / / ~ r ~ ~ ~ M ,~ p9R1<q 0. SHAflKS III a . .~ ;.. ~ 1rs44 ~ ~ ~~\Q ~ j 4 ~ "~ 6/297 ~, ~R~ ~~~ ~,o~ ., ~. ~ i ~~,~o ~ ' ~~ ~ r ~ ~ \ ~/ \ ~~ 1 i C--~ \ ~ 1 ~ / A[ TER~'4TE' ' ~ lPF o vAR~'~B[F RpvTF ~ =?o3s J96 se' PLAT OF SURVEY SNOKfNG NEW 10" SAN/TARY SENf7~ EASEMENT y R/jy ~?,?p ro eE coNVFrm ro J /yC HALL J: AND DIARrS ~ HALL ~~ LEGAC REF.• D.B. 426 Pg. 9Q6 ~~V AID A~IKE'r N4~ A i~ iNNA P 1 t SJ~,Nh1Y5 ASS>AG~IIE~ P.C. , I. A X~M sr,~~a~s t PrA~s Across A Pa4now o~- ~r3 ttA;ar.~-~ PARr~Y B ~xywae'~ -a a4v~s PLAT fROAI REGARDS FOR ~~~ ~-~ TANY CRU~i/PACKER LiiTE:• x/2/97 scacE: / ~50' P.B. 1? Py. 1B1 TAX PARG~Z 11?-(?f -B G4LC.• /RA ORAM9V BY /R4 VALLEY MAC/S7FRlAL D/STR/CT CREH:• Rk7L^ F.B.: 96.QI B07~T0(lRT CO[/NTY, V1RG/N/A CHECKED BY /Y~B ND.: J970J4 ft-~ ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 1997 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO GRANT THE RIGHT TO USE A COUNTY WATER LINE EASEMENT FOR PRIVATE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE BY CICERO H. HALL, JR. AND DORIS B. HALL WHEREAS, John M. Oakey, Inc., a Virginia corporation, is the owner of a certain parcel of land (Tax Map No. 112-(2)-B) on Alternate Route #220 located partially in the County of Roanoke and partially in the County of Botetourt, Virginia; and, WHEREAS, Roanoke County has an existing 20' water line easement running along the southern boundary line of the Oakey parcel granted by easement document dated February 8, 1990 of record in Deed Book 1320 at page 352; and, WHEREAS, Cicero H. Hall, Jr. and Doris B. Hall are the owners of a certain parcel of land (Tax Map No. 112-(2)-C) located east of and adjacent to the Oakey property, and the Halls need to acquire a 10' private sewer easement within the public easement in order to provide service to their property; and, WHEREAS, the proposed private easement does not conflict with the present or proposed County use of the existing water line easement; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading of this ordinance was held on September 9, 1997; and a second reading was held on September 23, 1997. THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County C:\OFFICE\WPWIN\WPDOCS\AGENDA\REALEST~HALL.ORD 1 ~- a of Roanoke, Virginia as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject private easement does not conflict with the specified public use of the easement, the form of the real estate interest in the subject water line easement renders it unacceptable and unavailable for other public uses, and and is hereby declared to be surplus; and, 2. That conveyance Cicero H. Hall, Jr. and Doris B. Hall of a 10' private sanitary sewer easement within the existing 20' water line easement, as shown upon the plat dated June 2, 1997, made by Shanks Associates, P.C., a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby authorized. 3. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as may be necessary to accomplish the conveyance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. C:\OFFICE\WPWIN\WPDOCS\AGENDA\REALEST\HALL.ORD 2 ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER -~~ " ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 23, 1997 AGENDA ITEM: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1 FIRE CODE BOARD OF APPEALS At their August 19 meeting, the Board of Supervisors approved changes to the County Fire Prevention Code which authorized the Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals as the appropriate committee to hear appeals to the Fire Prevention Code. The Fire Code Board of Appeals must include members with fire protection engineering experience, or a fire protection contractor with ten years experience, and an electrical engineer. To meet this criteria, the Board of Supervisors needs to appoint two alternates representing these areas of expertise to serve four-year terms. The alternates will be called to serve as regular members when there are appeals to the Fire Prevention and Protection Code. They may also serve as alternates to the Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals. 2. GRIEVANCE PANEL The three year term of Henry H. Wise, alternate, expires October 21, 1997. 3 Hanging Rock Battleground and rail Preservation Foundation The three year term of Timothy W. Gubala will expire October 25, 1997. 4. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY The four year term of Billy H. Branch will expire September 27, 1997. ~ ROANOKE COUNTY COMMISSION FOR SENIOR AND CHALLENGED CITIZENS At their July 22 meeting, the Board of Supervisors approved the establishment of the above task force and the appointment of two individuals from each magisterial district who meet the criteria of being disabled, physically challenged, senior citizen or a family member who is a caregiver of such a person. Supervisor Nickens is nominating Mrs. Donna Chewning to represent the Vinton Magisterial District. Her confirmation is listed on the Consent Agenda. SUBMITTED BY: Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: ~'~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved () Motion by: Eddy _ _ Denied () Johnson _ _ Received () Harrison _ _ Referred () Minnix _ _ _ To () Nickens _ _ ~` ~ ... (r~,,,- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 1997 RESOLUTION APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM J CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. that the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for September 23, 1997, designated as Item J -Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 6, inclusive, as follows: Approval of Minutes -August 19, 1997 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Grievance Panel and the Commission for Senior and Challenged Citizens. 3. Request for acceptance of Hollins Court Circle into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 4. Resolution of appreciation upon the retirement of George H. Altice, Jr., General Services Department. 5. Donation of 15 foot drainage easement on property owned by Brian M. & Ellen Hancock to the Board of Supervisors. 6. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Lilies of the Gardens, Section 3. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. ~r" ~ - Co AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 1997 RESOLUTION 092397.7 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM J CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. that the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for September 23, 1997, designated as Item J -Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 6, inclusive, as follows: Approval of Minutes -August 19, 1997 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Grievance Panel and the Commission for Senior and Challenged Citizens. 3. Request for acceptance of Hollins Court Circle into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 4. Resolution of appreciation upon the retirement of George H. Altice, Jr., General Services Department. 5. Donation of 15 foot drainage easement on property owned by Brian M. & Ellen Hancock to the Board of Supervisors. 6. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Lilies of the Gardens, Section 3. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board cc: File Gary Robertson, Utility Director Bill Rand, General Services Director Arnold Covey, Engineering & Inspections ~ J ACTION NO. A- 092397-7.a ITEM NUMBER s~°'~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 23, 1997 AGENDA ITEM: Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Grievance Panel and the Commission for Senior and Challenged Citizens COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The following nominations were made at the September 9 ,1997 meeting, and should now be confirmed. Grievance Panel Supervisor Nickens nominated Cecil Hill to serve another two-year term which will expires September 27, 1999. Commission for Senior and Challenaed Citizens Supervisor Harrison nominated Terry Conner and the Reverend Jim Reynolds. Supervisor Eddy nominated Denise Swanson and Dee. W. Pincock. Supervisor Nickens has nominated Donna Chewning and requested that her appointment be placed on the Consent Agenda. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the above appointments be confirmed by the Board of Supervisors. J ~} . i J_ ~ r Respectfully submitted, Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board Approved by, G Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Supervisor Minnix No Yes Absent Denied ( ) toap...prove confirmation of Eddy ~ Received ( ) committee ab~ointments Harrison _~ Referred ( ) Johnson ~ To ( ) Minnix ~ Nickens ~ cc: File Joseph Sgroi, Human Resources John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator Grievance Panel File Commission for Senior and Challenged Citizens File THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, IN REGULAR MEETING ON THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1997, ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING: RESOLUTION 092397-7.b REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF HOLLINS COURT CIRCLE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM WHEREAS, the streets described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(a), fully incorporated herein by reference, are shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, and WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised this Board the streets meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(A) to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision treet Requirements. and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right- of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote Moved by: Supervisor Minnix Yeas: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Johnson Nays: None Absent: Supervisor Nickens A Copy Teste: Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board CC: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering and Inspections Virginia Department of Transportation (Certified) ~- NOR TH ,, rod' ~ iq~3 s 6 _ ; 7a~9 ,~,~ • e~ 7a70 • y 12 ,z 40 195p ° !ens a~ roe. ~ iqq~ °~ N 79,E _ebe ON , i 39 '.. 13 ~~ ~ ! . s, 38 ,~~ / ~, „~ 779? ¢ 1e~1 cf' / / 1~ ~, a 32 '. /> n 37 ' s o`4 ~7j9J ibgp ` 14 „ 2 ,Q 4•e ~ 9, b ~ ,a,9 ~ 3 36 ~ - ~ O , 7776 ~zs v. >>s~ ~ F ... 31 ,. k ~' + leer 19 $ 16 0 's 1 2 ~ 6 7769 7777 a. •o ~a7z 77r~ a '. O 35 ~ ~~ nos a 34 ~o+ ~ Ilins ' ~ 'I 1a7~ Court Cirele 's_ !96 .t' a.K ~0 ~~ 17~ V 770! 18 ,vim ~ ll~y r~ r, 29 ~ , ~. . 779 '' 17x9 ,+ r o ~ 1 ~ee.~ u 19 'fro z- + a 3 'z er 21 F '. 660 Ac r, 28 7777 20 : 2`'.a ~ .. ; nss a„ nsT .~ 176J ]OTr ~y ~e a'77iJ !~, - ~ ~. 27 s 1.w 1 PROPOSED ADDITION SHOWN IN GRAY DESCRIPTION: 1) Hollins Court Circle -From the east cul-de-sac to the west intersection of Hollins Court Drive. LENGTH: (1) 0.05 MILES RIGHT OF WAY: (1) 50 FEET ROADWAY WIDTH: (1) 26 FEET SERVICE: (1) 3 HOMES ROANOKE COUNTY HOLLINS COURT - SECTION 1 ENGINEERING & _ INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT ~ / i C m L U Q E 2 c m 5 N a Q a n .~ a y `o v u 0 E M N ~ 0 O ~. > z ~ ° E v ~. O n ~~ ~, ~ ~ O O O O O r Z C~ C n _ 3 ~ o ~n C4 Q H ~ U ^ z m m m m m m m ~""~ e a a o a o 0 ,-a a a a a a a a a 0 d 4 x a x H ~ H o O ~ xQQ m ~ SxQ~ m ]~5~~j Q7 ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ yy U ~ E-i o O ~ r I U Q ~ ~ ~ U c ~ H H ~ ~ Z' N fA ~ H m m ~ v~ ~ m m m m d W W 3 p p ~ O O O ~ ~ d ~ H pC 2s 8 8 5 5 ~ ~ `o H ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~i ~' ~ C4 ~ yC~ yC~ d yC. V d ~ Q C4 V ~ .y 7 ` w Q r ~ a LL Q r ~ a ` a O r Q a ` LL 0 r a ti p r 'a ~i O r a u`, 0 r a x m Q ~ LYi .~- a O '~ U W `o 1-a L ~ ~ Z H H a U ~ 0 4 x Z ~ N P1 Q 1(I f0 ^ d r0 Z ~3 z w x LL Z 6 U r- Q W U ITEM NUMBER 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 23, 1997 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Hollins Court Circle into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~N~~~ ~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Boone, Boone and Loeb, the developer of Hollins Court, Section 1, requests that the Board of Supervisors approve a resolution to the Virginia Department of Transportation requesting that they accept 0.05 mile of Hollins Court Circle, from the east cul-de-sac to the west intersection of Hollins Court Drive. The staff has inspected this road along with representatives of the Virginia Department of Transportation and finds the road is acceptable. FISCAL IMPACT: No county funding is required. RECOMMENDATIONS: The staff recommends that the Board approve a resolution to VDOT requesting that they accept Hollins Court Circle~into the Secondary Road System. ITTED BY: Arnold Covey, Director of Engineering & Inspections APPROVED: Elmer C. odge County Administrator 1 ~-~- Approved Denied Received Referred to ACTION Motion by: VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy _ Harrison Johnson _ Minnix _ Nickens 2 ~3 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, IN REGULAR MEETING ON THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1997, ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING: RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF HOLLINS COURT CIRCLE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the streets described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(a), fully incorporated herein by reference, are shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, and WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised this Board the streets meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(A) to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements. and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right- of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote Moved by: Seconded by: _ Yeas: Nays: A Copy Teste: Mary Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors copy: Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering and Inspections Virginia Department of Transportation File ~ ~ .~ - y AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 1997 RESOLUTION 092397-7.C EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO GEORGE H. ALTICE, JR. FOR OVER TWENTY-THREE YEARS OF SERVICES TO ROANOKE COUNTY WHEREAS, George H. Altice, Jr. was first employed on July 16, 1973 as a Building Maintenance Man in the General Services Department, and has served since June 25, 1979 as Building Maintenance Supervisor; and WHEREAS, George H. Altice, Jr., through his employment with Roanoke County, has been instrumental in improving the quality of life for its citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to GEORGE H. ALTICE, JR. for over twenty-three years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke County. FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy, restful, and productive retirement. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board cc: File Resolution of Appreciation File Joseph Sgroi, Department of Human Resources /, ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER v ' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 23, 1997 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution of appreciation upon the retirement of George H. Altice, Jr., General Services Department COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: z~-~ G~L~(~'`z ~C.~.-~~ Mr. George H. Altice, Jr., General Services Department, retired on May 1, 1997, from Roanoke County with over twenty three years of service. He has requested that his resolution be mailed to him. It is recommended that the Board approve the attached resolution and direct the Clerk to mail it to Mr. Altice. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, ~,. Brenda J. Holton Elmer C. Hodge Deputy Clerk County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Ref erred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy Harrison Johnson Minnix Nickens .3-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 1997 RESOLUTION EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO GEORGE H. ALTICE, JR. FOR OVER TWENTY-THREE YEARS OF SERVICES TO ROANOKE COUNTY WHEREAS, George H. Altice, Jr. was first employed on July 16, 1973 as a Building Maintenance Man in the General Services Department, and has served since June 25, 1979 as Building Maintenance Supervisor; and WHEREAS, George H. Altice, Jr., through his employment with Roanoke County, has been instrumental in improving the quality of life for its citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to GEORGE H. ALTICE, JR. for over twenty-three years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke County. FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy, restful, and productive retirement. ,~ . ACTION NO. p- 092397 7•d ITEM NO. '"~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 23, 1997 AGENDA ITEM: Donation of 15' drainage easement on property owned by Brian M. & Ellen Hancock (Tax Map No. 77.18-2-24) to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This consent agenda item involves acceptance of the following easement conveyed to the Board of Supervisors for drainage purposes, in connection with the Green Valley Bond Project, Cave Spring Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke: a) Donation of drainage easement, fifteen feet (15') in width, from Brian M. Hancock and Ellen J. Hancock, husband and wife, (Tax Map No. 77.18-2-24) as shown on a plat prepared by the Roanoke County Engineering Department, dated July 13, 1994, a copy of which is attached hereto. The location and dimensions of this easement have been reviewed and approved by the County's engineering staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of this easement. submi Arnold Covey, Direl~or Engineering & Inspections Approved, ~~ E mer C. Hodge County Administrator ~5 ----------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Eubervi~nr M;nniv No Yes Absent Denied ( ) to accent Basemen Eddy _~ Received ( ) Harrison Referred ( ) -~ To ( ) Johnson x Minnix ~_ Nickens ~ cc: File Gary Robertson, Utility Director Arnold Covey, Engineering & Inspections ~~ --y METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT REPRESENT A COMPOSITE OF DEEDS, PLATS, AND CALCULATED INFORMATION AND DO NOT REFLECT AN ACCURATE BOUNDARY SURVEY. PROPERTY OF RICHARD W. & CECIL K. REESE TAX MAP No.77.18-2-25 ~ ~O ~`~ 6g ~ 1~0,. PROPERTY OF BRIAN M. & ELLEN HANCOCK (P.6.3, PG.153) ti ~~ ~~ ~. ~O. 0~,, PROPERTY OF H. & B. ASSOCIATES TAX MAP No.77.18-5-1 PROPOSED 15' DRAINAGE ESMT. ~~ ~/ Q~Q~, ~ `~O- S ~ ~~ 9~~ 6' ~• ~G s°o. °o-. ~'2 ~` O,A ~`~S ~~~ ~ ~9G '`~S, EXIST. 5' D.E.---. ,~\~~ ~ \\~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~ / ,, ~ , o0 5~ ~~ ~~ S 1 PROPERTY OF JAMES B. SINK TAX MAP No.77.18-2-23 77 18-2-24 TAX MAP N0. ___'_______ PREPARED B Y.• R OANOKE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: ~ 7_ 13= 9 4 G:\CAD\PLATS\7718223 SCALE: _ 1 " =40' PLAT SHOWING PROPOSED DRAINAGE EASEMENT BEING CONVEYED TO ROANOKE COUNTY BY BRIAN M. & ELLEN HANCOCK ACTION # A- 092397-7.e ITEM NUMBER ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 23, 1997 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Lilies of the Gardens, Section 3 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ,~~~~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Developers of Lilies of the Gardens, Section 3, Strauss Construction Corporation, have requested that Roanoke County accept the Deed conveying the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the subdivision along with all necessary easements. The water and sewer facilities are installed, as shown on plans prepared by Lumsden & Associates, P.C. entitled Lilies of the Gardens, Section 3, which are on file in the County Engineering Department. The water and sanitary sewer facility construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County. FISCAL IMPACT: The value of the water and sanitary sewer construction is $26,000 and $40,000 respectively. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the Lilies of the Gardens, Section 3 subdivision along with all necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: J~-~ Gary Robert on, P.E. Utility Director Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION Approved (x) Motion by: Supervisor Minnix Denied ( ) ~o approve acceptance of water Received ( ) ~d sancta v sewer ac'~it;P Referred ( ) To ( ) VOTE No Yes Absent Eddy ~_ Harrison _~ Johnson ~ Minnix ~_ Nickens ~_ cc: File Gary Robertson, utility Director Arnold Covey, Engineering & Inspections ~' t~.P THIS CHATTEL DEED, made this 22nd day of august , 19 9 , by and between: Strauss Construcgon Corporation . a ~V' gt~ia .corporation, hereinafter referred to as the "Developer," party of the first part; and the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, its successors or assigns, hereinafter referred to as the "Board," party of the second part. :WITNESSETH: THAT FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual benefits accruing to the parties, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Developer does hereby GRANT, CONVEY, ASSIGN .AND TRANSFER, with the covenants of GENERAL WARRANTY OF TITLE, in fee simple unto the Board all water and/or sewer lines, valves, fittings, laterals, connections, storage facilities, sources of water supply, pumps, manholes and any and all other equipment and appurtenances thereunto belonging, in and to the water and/or sewer systems in the streets, avenues, public utility, easement areas, water and sewer easement areas that have been or may hereafter be installed by the Developer, along with the right to perpetually use and occupy the easements in which the same may be located, all of which is more particulazly shown, described and designated as follows, to wit: Page 1 of 4 As shown on the plan entitled Lilies of the Gardens. Section 3 ,made by ~,.u~s~ien & Associates. P.C. and on file in the Roanoke County Engineering ~,.. Department. The Developer does hereby covenant and warrant that it will be responsible for the proper installation and construction of the said waterand/or sewer systems including repair of surface areas affected by settlement of utility trenches for a period of one { I) year after date of acceptance by the Boazd and will perform any necessary repairs at its cost. Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator of Raanoke County, Virginia, hereby joins in the execution of this instrument to signify the acceptance of this conveyance pursuant to Resolution No. adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, on the day of , 19 Page 2 of 4 WITNESS THE FOLLOWING signatures and seals: Developer: By: As: State of: Virginia County/City of: Roanoke , to wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this: 22nd ,day of August 19 97 , By: Steven S. Strauss Its President Duly authorized officer Title on behalf of Strauss CQn~#~iction Corporation Notary Public ~ My Conunission expires: - ~O Ood J-~ Page 3 of 4 • '. ~ Approved as to form: Board of Supervisors of `~ Roanoke County, Virginia ~~ By: (SEAL) County Attorney Eimer C. Hodge County Administrator State of: Virginia County/City of Roanoke, , to wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this: day of 19 , by Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator, on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. Notary Public My Commission expires: Page 4 of 4 SCI/ 9~ 1 _ _ _ _ . _.. L __. .. _ .. ~ to ~I J 1/ II/f4 1 . ~' ~ I I I •TM/ NIOeW Ka, I • Lwsul . U I ~ rfv {w~ ~I.pI ~ •vc uar crow cA.svc ucas I~~ I ,",N.r a'ewa E ~ .oo• s+x.as• :at.n• cv. . ~ xoo. oo• saa.lf• Iu.s• frs. ox. ~ u•si•xs• v •s,•xr ~~ DR1V e ~ ~ x{a.It• sff.aa• sos.If• af•v•a{• v °a •or O ®~"ET~ Y a 9 _~° - ~ _ ~ ~ ~W f us++f 11N „ ~•. uaf ua.lo• ss.or ss~'; ~ - •xa• s In•,,.s,- n ~ a- ® ~` >® ~. ~ Y~ f1iIi1N Mif ~~~ + is. af• x• _aa•oa•xf• [ IS•xf •aa• N.M w fw• I ~~M~iv+L s-_ s~ : ,NS A n•1 rl ^ Neal s, v . g+r~ L "-~,+~~ ~~ I I n Ia~ (s.s aun, vArs. vorsa~ Np-~ - ~ 1 ~ W aar. fayNf tl sWlr~ri~~[lf~l IY ft v [a lirxWCI11p•vt vua• as W xa wult •t .11I•yy _ ,~,.~ -1~ ~ ` ~ y ~ vanui waNSrN I' ixi Iwiw xou~ovsiiiuinrNrii ruere no.ru wwaa uaxs ' A~A•r(nMw+nfol M• MIWNr I N,IM / 1 ~ ~•. ~ -~ us. N ` t * vM f ~ \ •~ ~ ~ _-_ f1fl 1+ il1I1N ^la~ ~ (=J I ! ~ i ~ / '~ ' Vaf Ii+l i / r _ - ~\ {\~ ~ _ _ _~ ~ _ A''NA M(•Y' aMµp Ral I ~ _ ~N y1W\~ I~nai~' \~ \\\\\ __+__ _ Lflf (~]/ d IA w N \ \~ \ _ N \iv \ ~A Na N ~ ~ N~NIM,A \ \ \\ ' \~ s ~' N~• NI ,NNE 6` , /~ f1Nj1t„ ~ \ \ ~ \\ \\~ \ ~\ YY \ "ws \ \ \ ~ N14,ay L~ lA: ~r~~M.x• AIWINiM1 fIAANM IAI•M.H•1'N \\ A.r P ~~, y~• •r w.ti rWrllrr r . ~~\., ~, \ \ pew _!1• 1 'q•a q4w 7„I. frAAW/ iiNNllrG(IIN iOIIrINI~OM \ ,f•w fir'. ~ ?t ~ A' O.l NN ry. nK ' ,B pore: ~' v v~~. Yf NwIKf NI wI/M/Aiiw 7f G4 '~4 t; ~ yl. ' ~ n•w.y !01 aY+MN1 iY7~ IMtlt I. \ \. ^ \ . \ ~I \ \ \ \ \ ~ . O \ \•~::' ',\ ~ B sN v1~ ~: ~ S r1 W N e 'I "" O 6 fi , ~ ,.` • c 6°l sj=9 ++ ~~ 9 Y , ~ ~~ 60 ~ 3~ / es +~. xr °' t N'NA~.NI raf[wi~l e~ ~• '~j Y ,94 ~ f. ~ d E 21 tl S *- ^\ ? + rV b^y2 ' a n~RIV cove '' LnS- rl ~ e II fY ex# 1~ R ~} = ~ \ I•nnf fM1 fNYY ff l•NNN i R ~~ ? i \ _ f t F I /~f /_ ~ 1~ ~~ v t~,i'~ +~~ t' / nwrfW No~wrSr aN~NI~ ) \ i ~ / ~ y- i Ca•.^.N.r. of c~ ~~~ I w f..f N'NUVa{t rwtva r\ j M~~/T-. ~r \ / f `~ ~ f1' SI[AI Iai fL fANMY/ / -- -- •i I /y 1. al N.M1rt•Mrc ~ywr•~s Ya:~lA txsrraa var Ivaww / I / __ -- xs _i „~~ M / ~ 'r w1'M1 os .. _~ _.__"tc ~..._._ i ~ ROANOKE COUNTY UTILITY DEPARTMENT ACCEPTANCE OF WATER AND SEWER FACILITIES SERVING LILIES OF THE GARDEN, SECTION 3 „, , o- GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA of General Amount Fund Revenues Beginning Balance at July 1, 1997 (unaudited) $10,083,177 10.16% August 19, 1997 First installment payment on West County Business Park (1,000,000) Balance at September 23, 1997 $9,083,177 9.15% Changes below this line are for information and planning purposes only. Balance from above $9,083,177 West County Business Park -balance (2,000,000) Reserve for R.R. Donnelly - Phase II (730,700) Reserve for Valley Gateway sewer extension (150,000) Potential Liability (400,000) $5,802,477 5.85% Note: On December 18, 1990, the Board of Supervisors adopted a goal statement to maintain the General Fund Unappropriated Balance at 6.25% of General Fund Revenues 1997-98 General Fund Revenues $99,264,769 6.25% of General Fund Revenues $6,204,048 Respectfully Submitted, ~~~. Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance M:\Finance\Common\B oard\Gen97 . WK4 b-~ CAPITAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Amount Beginning Balance at July 1, 1997 (unaudited) $1,113,043.00 Balance at September 23, 1997 $1,113,043.00 This balance has been unofficially designated to pay for the debt on Phase I of the School Capital Program. Note: $100,000 of these funds have been temporarily advanced to the Mayflower Hills Park project. Respectfully Submitted, 9J~,~,a,~. ~~.~' Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance M:\Finance\Common\B oard\Cap97 . WK4 D-~ RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Amount From 1997-98 Original Budget $143,000.00 Balance at September 23, 1997 $143,000.00 Respectfully Submitted, ~.~~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance M:\Finance\Common\Board\Board97. WK4 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~ "` AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 23, 1997 AGENDA ITEM: Accounts Paid -August 1997 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Payments to Vendors: $3,127,687.00 Payroll: 8/8/96 $658,415.30 Voided 2 Checks 8/11/97 ($1,167.59) 2 manual checks 8/11/97 734.98 8/22/97 685,712.35 1,343,695.04 $4,471,382.04 A detailed listing of the payments is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. SUBMITTED BY: ~LcYivz,e, ~ • ~~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance Approved () Motion by No Yes Abs Denied () Eddy Received () Harrison Referred O Johnson To () Minnix Nickens • M: \FINANCE\COMMON\BOARD\AC CTPAID. AUG ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: September 23, 1997 AGENDA ITEM: Work Session on the South County District Park Master Plan COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: At a joint work session with the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission on October 8, 1996, the Board requested that the staff and commission develop a proposal for the land around Merriman Road. On January 28, 1997, the Board of Supervisors appropriated $12,000 to proceed with the development of a South County District Park Master Plan. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Department of Parks and Recreation, a Citizens Planning Committee, the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission and Resource Planners, Inc., a recreation planning and architecture/engineering consulting firm, have developed two concept plans for the District Park in the Merriman Road area. Concept Plan A was developed for the entire site as a recreation park, and Concept Plan B was developed if the park is shared with the schools. The Parks and Recreation staff, the consultant and members of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission will present the proposed plans at the work session and be available to answer your questions. We will also present recreational needs for the various areas of Roanoke County. After reviewing the staff s work, I am convinced there is a serious shortage of athletic facilities in south County, and we need to move forward with one of the plans, whether or not we need to share the facility with the schools. Respec Ily Submitt by: ~-. Elm r C. Hodge County Administrator f ~- i ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved () Motion by: Eddy _ _ _ Denied () Johnson _ Received () Harrison _ Referred () Minnix _ _ _ To () Nickens _ _ _ UIIIiUllllilllllllllllllll11111il111111111111ii1i1lillllllfllilif~lill 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111(J e c = AGENDA ITEM NO. c ,V ... APPE CE REQUEST PUBLIC BEARING ORDINANCE .CITIZENS COMMENTS .,. o __ ... s ~^ } ~~ SUBJECT: 1 ~ 0~\ C ~ i t' `~~R...t~\\-nr, ASr~I`, ~. .~ .,. c I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the v meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS o FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY~ THE GUIDELINES LISTED = BELOW: e ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. _ ~. s o ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. C Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. s s ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ~ s ,~ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. .... ^ Speakers are requested to Leave any written statements and/or comments c with the clerk. o v .= ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP = SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. c ... PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK .,, ~- ,_ _.. r _ ~~ i O ~. s ~ ~ _ ~ ~ a.~ mlllllllllllllillllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllilllllllillltlilllliilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllli111i11111111~ ~iiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiii~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiiiiiiiiii~ - _ - q "7 - - - ~ 3- - - - - - 3 ~-- _ ~ _ - ~ - - AGENDA ITEM NO. - _ - _ - - -_ - _ _ - APPE CE R}~QUEST _ _ -_ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMI~~NTS - _ s -_ -_ - SUBJECT: ~..~ ~ S ~4 ~` C S' ~ J ~ .D ii1 ~ T 17 ~~ 5 ,fir .GIS ~ da ~ a ~' ~ ~ ~_ I would like the Chairman of rl:e ?~nard of Sup rvisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. c WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDREcc FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED = BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment = whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will c = decide the time I~mit based on the :number of citizens speaking on an issue, c and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to ~_ do otherwise. __ - ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized c speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ~ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c - - with the clerk. - ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON B1:'Hfi%F !~F AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION rRc ~1 7:KE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. c PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - _ - _ - _ - _ - _ - _ - _ = - fi~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~t~t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~t~ii'i U~ItIlttltltlttltl11111t1t1111ltltt!llltltttlt111lltll11111a!!Il11l~111111111illlllilllllllllllllUiillllllllilllllllllllillllll~ = _ = _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. N ... APPS CE REQUEST -_ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS s ~. ~~ s ~. SUBJECT: C.0/!1~ 1 X C7H~S~~ /~.~ c _. c c I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the v meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS .= o FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY~ THE GUIDELINES LISTED .~ BELOW: ` .o s c ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment c e whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, c and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ot~the Board to do otherwise. _ ~.. o ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of ~ view only. ,= ,° Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. s s ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. _- ,, r ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ .-;: ® Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments ~; with the clerk. - c ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP ,= SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP = ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT' THEM. - - - -_ a ` ~~ - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - - ~~ e~ ~ 1~ ~~ r. = 1~ .~ - al ~~ - ~ ~1 ~~ ~~ mII111111 fII111Illll iil illllll illllllll f111111111111111111111I1 i11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111~ ~- / MASTER PLAN REPORT SOUTHWEST DISTRICT PARg ROANOgE COUNTY, VIRGINIA Prepared For: ROANOgE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PA.RgS AND RECREAT70N SEPTEMBER 23, 1997 Prepared By: RESOURCE PLANNERS, INC. 3111 NORTHSIDE AVENUE RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23228 (80~ 261-6967 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE # I. INTRODUCTION 1 A. Purpose of Study B. Study Area C. District Park Concept Vicinity Map 2 II. SITE ANALYSIS 3 - 6 A. Existing Features B. Potential Park Sites Site Analysis Illustration 4 Aerial Photograph of Parkland 6 III. NEEDS, GOALS AND OBrTECTIVFS 7-8 A. Needs B. Goals C. Objectives IV. MASTER PLAN DESIGN NARRATIVE 9 A. Central Issues B. Planning Strategies C. Master Plan Approach V. DISTRICT PARK ELEMENTS 10-15 A. Current Facilities B. Proposed Facilities: Scheme A Master Plan Illustration 13 C. Proposed Facilities: Scheme B Master Plan Illustration 15 VI. SUMMARY A. Central Issues B. Planning Strategies VII. STATEMENT OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS PHASING APPROACH A. Scheme A B. Scheme B VIII. PARKLAND AND FACILITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT A. Introduction B. Parkland Needs C. Facilities Needs D. Summary IX. APPENDIX A. Planning Process Meeting Notes 16 17-22 23-32 33 8 Pages SOUTHWEST DISTRICT PARg ROANOgEE COUNTY, VIRGINIA I. INTRODUCTION: A. PURPOSE OF STUDY: 1. Resource Planners, Inc. , a Recreation Planning and Architecture / Engineering consulting Firm was commissioned by the County of Roanoke to study the area around Merriman Road in the southwest district of the County to assess the potential for creating amulti-use district park to serve the increasing need for active athletic and passive recreational facilities. 2. Pete Haislip, the County Director of Parks and Recreation convened a Citizens Planning Committee comprised of individuals involved with athletic associations, greenways, park and urban planning. Resource Planners, Inc. met with the Committee to discuss the County's needs, formulate goals and review alternative plans for the District Park. B. STUDY AREA: The area under consideration for the Park is generally bounded by Merriman Road and Back Creek from the Blue Ridge Parkway to the south, up to and including Shell Park to the north. (See Vicinity Map) C. DISTRICT PARK CONCEPT: With increasing demand for recreational facilities in Roanoke County, the study area offers an opportunity to combine several disconnected athletic-oriented parks with adjoining parcels to create a large single, multi-faceted park for passive as well as active recreation use. Tfie district park could be organized along Back Creek which touches most of the existing and potential park sites noted above. Access would be from Merriman and Crystal Creek Roads. The zoning of the park uses as well as the character of the individual outdoor spaces can follow the dropping elevations as one moves down to the creek from the roads through the floodplain and the floodway. Built structures and active uses could give way to more natural and passive uses along the creekway. 1 -~Z~ ~- VICINITY MAP ~, , =_ ~, ' . S ; ' ~v 1 ,: \ / ~ ~ -f;, ,- ~ ~ ~c fe a. _ ~~ ~W '~J~',', z r '1~ o l%'~1~~,;/ '~ ''~~' Rio ~~ _~,'' i ~ " ,~ `,' n lou ajn ~ °~ `~~' ~~'`• Residential Penn ~~ ~~d Forest ~'o Elem ~a CrYs fa ~ Cre e k pry Site ve Bask ~, Creek `~ ~~~~ ~~ l ite S Blue Rid ge Parkway ~ ~, ~ ~----~~ -- ~ `, North LOCATION MAP 2 II. SITE ANALYSIS: A. EXISTING FEATURES: 1. Merriman Road: The road is the key built element in the district park study. It borders three of the five parcels in the study area, connects the area to the County at large and contains the utilities which will serve the built facilities in the park. 2. Existing Parks: Starkey Park, Shell Park and Merriman Road Soccer Complex are established athletic complexes and hence are known destinations that people travel to from other parts of the County. They establish an active recreational character as places in the District Park which will add diversity and contrast to more natural, less active areas to be developed within the district park. a. Memman Road Soccer Complex: This newly constructed facility is an athletic complex accessed from Merriman Road. Facilities provided include three soccer fields and a gravel parking lot for 120 cars. One of the fields has night lighting. On the northern edge of the site is a service road to a pump station building beside Back Creek. b. Starkey Park: This is another newly constructed athletic facility with three baseball fields and amulti-purpose field. The largest baseball field is fenced and has night lighting. Access to the park is from Crystal Creek Drive with parking in two lots for about 110 cars. c. Shell Park: Located on the east side of Merriman Road, Shell Park is directly associated with Penn Forest Elementary School, sharing an entrance and parking. Facilities include three fenced and lighted baseball fields, one of which overlaps a football /soccer field, three lighted tennis courts, a large playground and a concession / restroom / maintenance building. 3 it i~ i~ i~ 1 1 i~ LIMIT OF POTl;1JT1AL t71STR.IGT (~tZ~~ ~_ ~~ ,~ P~LUE RIDCaE PAR.KWaY --JAT[ONALLY SIC~-.1lFICaNT LZpADWAY -pOSSiPSLE F1LTEfLED VtEwS -CO T~1ZK -UO bIZE~CT CbNNEC.T1oN TO ME~Y.tMA1J ~. ~ ~:. . • ~. ~:... `: ~~ ME.tz121MA~1 I2,OAD - P~Z,IMaQ,Y ~CC.E.SS TO PA21< atZEA F12oM COUNTY AT La2C~E -CONTAINS WATEQ, SEWEfL AND C~4S LINES 2EADILY AV/~ILd.P~LE, TU SITE. ~~ C.t2YSTAL Gt2EEK Dt2tVE - ACCESS To sTAfa+ceY ta4R.IC -SEPA1Z.aTES SC4bOL lLCTIVITY 517E FOAM ~yTa2.KG.Y P~I2K AND BACK CaZI:E.IC SLOT'E. - CONSTtLA1NTS TO PX~lLD1Nfq LAQC~E FAC.ILtTIES POTE,~iTIAL SC.u00L- IZE.LLITED AC11V lTY SITE -DOTE-NTIpL FOZ 4E31E4AL iL~C.iLEATtONAL 11St txl¢ING 5PJJOOL OFF -NpU2.S -LAR.yE-- A12.EA WITLt Cf ACCESS TO EXISTINy St~pAS Q FLOODPLAIt~I Q -SI[TNIFICANT t7EVELDPMG1f GOnISTtZA1NTS 0 - INCtZE.ASED flEVELODAGJ'f ~ COSTS SID>:.I~TIAL A2EA5 ~ --su~LL r~.eK " - BALLFIELPS , T~QSC, MAIUTE-NA-JCE FdG1L.ITIES EXISTNG ROAD EXISTNG ROAD R.O.W. PROPERTY LWE --'l-->SWALE CENTER LINE ---- WATER CENTER IUVE ---------- FLOOD WAY •~• 100 YEAR FLOOD PIAM • EXISTNG WATER l7JE -•- ,PROPOSED WATER LWE --•--•--•--•°•-- EXISTNG STORM DRAW) 5~ EXISTNG SANITARY SEWER -~~-•~-~•- -•• EXISTING GAS R.O.W. 6 EXISTING GAS LINE D 0 50100 200 400 600 NORTH , z v ~V~ w ~ ~ N Z Z w ~ '~ F- ' w VJ • w W ~ ~ V ~ W I- ~ W W ~ tV ~ a = Z > ~ ~ z a ~ J ~ D 2 ~ ~ J < W w V~ CG O~ " N1 °z W ~ ~~ Y y in ~ ~ U Z > Q LY H H ~ ~ W ~ ~ Y _ ~ O O cn REVISIONS: DRAWN BY: 84J CHECKED BY: J RF1 APPROVED BY: 5WL DATE: 4/3097 SG4LE: 1200' PROIER NO. 10520 SHEET 1 OF 1 4 ~ 3. 1 1 along which movement through District Park can be organized. study area. The creeks establish the natural character that contrasts the existing and future built facilities. The creeks are also important as linear design elements Back Creek: The creek and its tributaries are the most prominent natural features in the the 4. Fooodway and Floodplain: The periodic flooding that occurs along the creeks make the adjacent areas desirable for use as park land but also limit the potential B. 2. for development of built facilities. Structures should be avoided in the floodway and buildings in the floodplain will have increased construction costs due to the weak alluvial soils and potentially high ground water. Special features such as elevated mechanical controls and enhanced drainage systems will also add to construction costs of facilities built in the floodplain. POTENTIAL PARK SITES: is removed from Merriman Road, access could pose a problem requiring on entrance through one of the other parks or acquisition of property or an easement from Merriman Road. Roanoke Raceway Site: This 20 acre site bounded by Merriman Road Soccer Complex, Back Creek, Starkey Park and Plastics One, a small industrial site on the west side of Merriman Road. The site is comprised of three parcels owned by Plastics One and the County School Board. Recreational facilities would be an excellent use for this site. Since the site school. An engineering and study was undertaken in 1995 by Mattern and Craig, Inc. to evaluate the suitability of the site for a new school. The general conclusion of the study was that the area, accessibility and utility availability support concept of a school at the site, but the extensive floodway and floodplain areas, the soils and slopes on the site would make development costs very high. Taylor Tract: This 30 acre site located at the intersection of Crystal Creek and Memman Road has been considered for a new high 5 z v V W ° Z u z ~ o z O ~... W H W W 'Y ~ ~..~ ~ W N ~ ~ W " U ~ f~1 ~ Q _ ~ 7 Q OC ~ z U U ~ ~ F- p = a z ~ W ui '~ <V~ ~C ~ e _ ,Ow N V J t ~ W z ~~ Y ~ Z y v-, ~ V ~ > a ~ rn ~ ~ N ~ ~ z O = Q Z `"' Q N REVISIONS: DRAWN BY: 8~J CHECKED BY: J R f? APPROVED BY: 5~/L D.~TE: til3o/97 SGiLE: 1'= 200' PROTECT NO. 10520 SHEET of III. NEEDS. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES: The needs, goals and objectives were developed in meetings with the Citizen's Committee and the County Parks and Recreation Staff. A. NEEDS: 1. Pressing needs for active athletics which are increasingly over-taxing current facilities. (See Section VIII -Parkland and Facility Needs Assessment.) 2. Needs for alternative recreation facilities for general family needs, such as picnic areas, walking trails, unstructured play areas (not-dedicated to athletics) and protection of greenspace. B. GOALS: 1. Develop program of facilities that will provide diverse recreational opportunities, on a district and countywide basis. 2. Develop a Master Plan concept that unifies the three (3) existing recreation facilities into one cohesive district park. 3. Utilize the natural stream valley resources to its highest potential. 4. Provide for pedestrian trail /path networks throughout the park and provide connections to larger trail or greenway networks outside the site. 5. Incorporate public participation and input into planning process. 6. Develop optional approaches to arrangement and type of park facilities and means of ingress /egress to the district park. C. OBJECTIVES: 1. Recreational opportunities should be a balance of active and passive type facilities and programs. 2. Plan to make optimum use of existing facilities, and associated parking, with a minimum of reorganization or relocation. [NOTE: Merriman Soccer, Starkey and Shell parks are new facilities or newly renovated within the last five years.] 3. Develop a park plan that devotes large areas of greenspace to unprogrammed activities such as strolling and nature study. 7 4. Provide for a number of activities around picnic areas for use by families and people of all ages. 5. Develop a park plan that addresses the school system's stated needs for space for off-site athletic facilities on the Taylor Tract. 6. Utilize flat areas of site for active athletic facilities. 7. Develop strategies for implementation that address floodway and floodplain development restrictions. 8. Develop statement of probable construction costs to implement the Master Plan. 9. Develop phased implementation strategies that are logical from construction, programming and funding stand points. 10. Package developmental units that can take advantage of (outside County) funding opportunities for local, state and federal resources. 8 IV. MASTER PLAN DESIGN NARRATIVE: ' A. Central issues related to the development of a District Park for Southwest County: 1. Development of new parkland on Raceway (Plastics One) parcel adjacent to Back Creek. 2. Development of new parkland /sports facilities on the Taylor Tract (School Board). 3. Integration of new parkland with existing adjacent parkland encompassing Merriman Soccer Complex, Starkey Park and Shell Park /Penn Elementary School to form one unified park complex. ' B. PLANNING STRATEGIES: 1. A potential access point to the Raceway ' (Plastics One) parcel has been obtained at the intersection of Starkey Road and Merriman Roads. 2. The School Board is studying the use of the Taylor Tract for a high school sports complex to support anoff--site High School Facility. 3. Back Creek and the adjacent Blue Ridge Parkway represent a major greenway corridor within this part of the County and should be integrated into the District Park design. C. MASTER PLAN APPROACH: 1. Strategy A: All development on Raceway (Plastics One) and Taylor Tract will be under control and management of the Pazks and Recreation department for use as comprehensive recreation district park. (Scheme A: Master Plan) 2 StrategX B: Development of the Taylor Tract as an off-site high school athletic complex will be under control of the School Board. Raceway (Plastics One) parcel will be under control and management of the Parks and Recreation Department for use as a general recreation park infill between Merriman Soccer Complex and Starkey Park. (Scheme B: Master Plan) The Citizen's Committee expressed the desire that all facilities will be for joint use to serve the needs of all the citizens of South County. 9 V. DISTRICT PARK ELEMENTS: A. CURRENT FACILITIES: 1. Merriman Soccer Complex: a. (3) Soccer Fields; (1) lighted field b. Adjacent warmup area c. 120 car parking lot d. Merriman Road access: 1.) Entrance and service drive to parking lot 2.) Entrance and service drive to pump station 2. Starkey Park: a. (4) Baseball /Softball Fields; (1) lighted field b. (1) Multi-purpose Field (Overlay small ballfields) c. 75 car parking lot d. 34 car parking lot e. Crystal Creek road access: 1.) Entrance and service drive to large parking lot 2.) Entrance and service drive to small parking lot 3.) Private drive to residences across Back Creek 3. Shell Park (Penn Elementary Schooll: a. (3) Baseball /Softball Fields; (All lighted) b. (2) Multi-purpose Fields (overlay (2) ballfields -lighted) c. (3) Tennis courts; (All lighted) d. (1) Large playground e. (1) Picnic Shelter f. (1) Restroom /Concession /Maintenance and Park Office Building g. Walking Trail h. 160 car parking lot i. Merriman Road access: 1.) (2) entrances and service drive to parking lot 10 B. PROPOSED FACII.ITIES: SCHEME A 1. 2. Merriman Soccer Complex: a. Improvements to entrance and service roadway b. Back Creek Greenways Trail segment c. Central Trail connector (to Raceway Parcel) with bridge over tributary creek d. Shade tree plantings Raceway (Plastics One, Tract: a. (1) Multi-purpose overlaid Baseball; (lighted) b. (1) Multi-purpose Football /Soccer; (lighted) c. 170 car parking lot d. Playground e. Restroom Building f. (3) Picnic Shelters g. Court games (volleyball, horseshoes) h. Special Events Area (3.5 acres) i. Merriman Road access: 1.) Entrance improvements with turn lanes 2.) Roadway to parking lot through newly acquired parcel. j. Back Creek Greenway Trail segment k. Central Trail connector (Merriman to Starkey Road) 1. Woodlands re-vegetation buffer (Ballfields /Picnic Areas) 3. Starkey Park: a. Back Creek Greenways Trail segment b. Central Trail connector (Raceway to Taylor properties with bridges over tributary creek [pedestrian at greenways and light duty vehicle at central trail connector] ) c. Shade tree plantings 4. Taylor Tract: a. (1) Picnic Shelter b. 40 car parking lot c. Loop trail segment (connection to Back Creek Greenway Trail, Starkey Park [at-grade crossings of Crystal Creek Road] and Shell Park [underpass crossing of Merriman Road] ) 11 d. Crystal Creek Road access: 5. 1.) Entrance and service drive to 40 car parking lot 2.) (2) entrances and service drives to 325 car parking lot e. Playground f. Amphitheater - 250 - 300 seating capacity with permanent -stage g. 325 car parking lot h. (3) Softball /Baseball Fields; (All lighted) i. (1) Soccer Field; (lighted) j. (1) Restroom Building k. (1) Concession Building 1. Shade, screen and ornamental tree plantings Shell Park: a. Potential relocation of Maintenance /Park Office functions to new acquired entrance property to Raceway (Plastics One Tract) [creating additional space in existing building]. 12 _ - ------SOCCER ;- , - ---- NARKING id01 ,J_ ~~~ ~ -- PLAYGKOUNI7 `~1- _ __~,.~__ -._ AMPhiITt-IEATEK (3ACK CREEK GREENWAY=""~ ~ L,~VVN ._~ _.... -~1 ~~ TRi11L ~ \, -+----- Rr1Sl[3ALL ~ -- 11--- ------ P.IRKING (32.5) -~ ~,,./ .1__._ _.iR'~11. K ~ _ Y J. ~ ~ , - -- SOF1 f3.~1_L - ' --ia~ ~._ ,.-. .., - ___ uNL~ERCROUNr~ cKOSSlNc :,. ,, . -~--SHELL NARK OPF : - ',. //,~ NtEKRIMAN KOAD SOCCER C~ `!, ~`~ ~`~ :~T_ ~ ,•~ \'- 't, ~''_ `~~ r U~ ,, 0 50100 200 400 600 FEET OgTH X J z Z u ~ r , r ` oc ~ `/ ° w w z w ~ ~ ~ N V W Z ~ ~r _ ~ ~ Q w w a d' y Y ~ N ry iy Z N `= = U 7 4 > ~ ~ L Q Z ~..i ~ ~ O a. _ ~ '~ :J w ~ a, y, N ~ - a J w < V z t w ; ~ •;~ er Q ~ arr ~ ~ 2 ` W . '~``~ ~ ~, Y ~ ~ 2 ~ '~ Q J ~ 4 ~ N W p~ ~ n Z Q U w ~~~ ~ Z ~ ~ O " kEV I til0\5 flli; ~; CHEfNFP f17": ~'~„ (k~l fC 7/11/97 ~CALt:. i'E200' f~~urc:rv<, 1os2o SH[if'1 1 ()! 2 C. PROPOSED FACILITIES: SCHEME B 3 2. 3. 4. 5. Merriman Soccer Complex: a. Improvements to entrance and service roadway b. Back Creek Greenways Trail segment c. Central Trail connector (to Raceway Parcel) d. Shade tree plantings Raceway~Plastics One TractZ a. b. c. d. e. f. g• h. i. J• (2) Baseball /Softball; (All lighted) (1) Multi-purpose Football /Soccer; (lighted) 200 car parking lot Amphitheater; 250 - 300 seating capacity with permanent stage Playground Restroom Building (2) Picnic Shelters Court games (volleyball, horseshoes) Special Events Area (2.5 acres) Merriman Road access: 1.) Entrance improvements with turn lanes 2.) Roadway to parking lot through newly acquired parcel k. Back Creek Greenway Trail segment 1. Central Trail connector (Merriman to Starkey Road) m. Woodlands re-vegetation buffer (Ballfields /Picnic Areas) Starkey Park: a. Back Creek Greenways Trail segment b. Central Trail connector (Raceway to Taylor properties with bridges over tributary creek [pedestrian at greenways and light duty vehicle at central trail connector] ) Taylor Tract: (Reserved for School Sports Complexl a. Park Office and Maintenance Compound b. (2) Picnic Shelters c. 80 car parking lot d. Loop trail segment (connection to Back Creek greenway trail, Starkey Park [at grade crossings Crystal Creek Road] and Shell Park [underpass crossing of Merriman Road] ) e. Tree plantings Shell Park: a. Potential relocation of Maintenance /Park Office functions to new acquired entrance property to Raceway (Plastics One Tract) [creating additional space in existing building]. 14 ~.1,,, ~ ~'.~ r ,p' / _ ~j °, 0 50700 200 400 4V0 FEET NORTH -- UNDE;KGROUN(~ CKOSSINC; .. ,'vtERRI,ti1AN RO,~L) SOCCER CO - -'~--- SHFI L PARK f \ ~~ ~_~~, ~L _. . ~~tULTI-PURPOSE PIEI`---!y~- B~CK CKEEK GREFNW~.''-~=-"~ 1 <,.1=____ _... _._. PICNIC AR[A B,~CK CKEtI.__-- OPEN PLral' _'..-_ -- !i-_-.. _-__ _____ _. TRAIL ~1 ~ ~ ~ i / ~ ~~ ~: I J z z ;; ~ V a ~ Z o Z ~ Z - N ~ w , W ~ ~ w y W ~ W 7 ~/~! ''' Q V ~ OC y J 0 o d J V ~''', ~ 'd Chi G = W a ~v L W ~~`. ~.~, ,,~, t,, O .~~r ~ a ~~~~ ~~'C. W ~ ~_ M n Y Q F ~.. ~~ :. `vM ~4 z ~c m ~'" '" ~ ~ ~ ,. s ~- ~ v, w v I=- O ~ ~ cn RL VISIONS. urzn~rn nv r~,.,~; CI I&(~KED f31~ J: , -, nrrr~;ovao rev - ,~c nnrr rf ~ vs~ XAI.f 7'=200' ha~~nirn~o ~os2o Sliel. T 2 Or 2 ' VI. SUNIlVIARY: ' A. CENTRAL ISSUES: Both schemes address the development of a general purpose park for the Raceway ' (Plastics One) parcel. Scheme A focuses more on the passive recreational components. Scheme B on the active, due to anticipated use restrictions of the Taylor Tract. The Taylor Tract is shown for a major active sports complex in ' Scheme A, tying in with the adjacent Starkey Park sports fields. In Scheme B, the Taylor Tract is shown as undefined, reserved for School Board use. Integration of the new parkland with existing parkland is shown in both Schemes ' A and B by use of greenway /trail corridors on the perimeter and interior of the parcels, all tied to the spine along Back Creek. ' B. PLANNING STRATEGIES: A School Board high school sports complex can be assumed to be similar to ' Scheme A Parks and Recreation complex and should be compatible with the ancillary facilities proposed. Both plans utilize the Back Creek Greenways and tributary streams to link the District Park with the valuable natural resource. 1 1 C ' 16 STATEMENT OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS /PHASING APPROACH SOUTHWEST DISTRICT PARg RDANOgE COUNTY, VIRGINIA I. SCHEME A: Phase I: A. Merriman Road Soccer Complex: B. Raceway (Plastics One Parcel: 1. Road (24' asphalt; VDOT standards) 2,000 L.F. 2. Parking (surface treatment) 170 spaces 3. Multi-Purpose Field 4. Softball /Multi-Purpose Field (backstop and sideline fencing) Total C. Starkey Park: D. Taylor Tract: 1. Roads /Driveways (24' asphalt) 800 L.F. 2. Parking: -0- * $ 150,000.00 127,000.00 45,000.00 55,000.00 $ 377,500.00 -0- * $ 100,000.00 a. Main 325 spaces 292,500.00 b. Picnic 40 spaces 30,000.00 3. Soccer Field: 55,000.00 4. Baseball /Softball Fields (3) (backstop; full fencing) 195,000.00 5. Landscaping 10.000.00 Total $ 682,500.00 E. Shell Park: -0- F. Utilities: ~- Total for Phase I: $1,060,000.00 * Reimbursable through VDOT Recreational Access Road Program at 100%. 17 Phase II: A. Memman Road Soccer Complex: 1. Trails (10'; stone dust) 2,000 L.F. $ 20,000.00 2. Landscaping 5.000.00 Total $ 25,000.00 B. Raceway (Plastics Ones Parcel: 1. Trails (10'; stone dust) 2,800 L.F. $ 28,000.00 2. Bridges (2) 12,000.00 3. Picnic Shelters (3) 60,000.00 4. Landscaping 8,750.00 Total $ 108,750.00 C. Starkey Park: 1. Trails (10'; stone dust) 1,700 L.F. $ 17,000.00 2. Landscaping 5.000.00 Total $ 22,000.00 D. Taylor Tract: 1. Trails 3,250 L.F. . $ 32,000.00 2. Playground 35,000.00 3. Amphitheater (250 - 300 seatin g capacity) 225,000.00 4. Picnic Shelter (1) 20,000.00 5. Below Grade Road Crossing 30,000.00 6. Landscaping 10.000.00 Total $ 352,000.00 E. Shell Park: 1. Trails (10'; stone dust) 200 L.F. $ 2,000.00 2. Landscaping 1,500.00 Total $ 3,500.00 F. Utilities: -0- TOTAL PHASE II: $ 511,250.00 18 Phase III: A. Merriman Road Soccer Complex: -0- B. Raceway (Plastics Onel Parcel: 1. Multi-Purpose Field -Lighting (30 F.C.) $ 60,000.00 2. Restroom Building (masonry) 70,000.00 3. Utilities (water, sewer and electrical power) 37,500.00 Total $ 167,500.00 C. Starkey Park: -0- D. Taylor Tract: 1. Soccer Field -Lighting (30 F.C.) $ 60,000.00 2. Baseball /Softball Fields (3) - ' Lighting (30 / 20 F.C.) 180,000.00 3. Restroom Building (masonry) 70,000.00 4. Utilities (water, sewer and electrical power) 37,500.00 Total $ 347,500.00 E. Shell Park: -0- TOTAL PHASE III: $ 515,000.00 TOTAL PARK BUILD-OiTT: $2,086,250.00 19 II. SCHEME B: Phase I: A. Merriman Road Soccer Complex: -0- B. Raceway~Plastics One) Parcel: 1. Roads (24' asphalt; VDOT standards) 950 L.F. $ 118,750.00 2. Parking (surface treatment) 200 spaces spaces 150,000.00 3. Multi-Purpose Field 45,000.00 4. Baseball, Softball Fields (backstop and sideline fencing) 125.000.00 Total $ 438,750.00 C. Starkey Park: -0- D. Tavlor Tract: -0- E. Shell Park: -0- F. Utilities: -0- Total for Phase I: - $ 438,750.00 * Reimbursables through VDOT Recreational Access Road Program at 100%. Phase II: A. Merriman Road Soccer Complex: 1. Trails (10'; stone dust) 2,000 L.F. $ 20,000.00 2. Landscaping 5.000.00 Total $ 25,000.00 20 B. Raceway~Plastics Onel Parcel: 1. Trails (10'; stone dust) 2,200 L.F. 2. Bridges (3) 3. Playground 4. Amphitheater (250 - 300 seating capacity) 5. Picnic Shelters (2) 6. Landscaping Total C. Starkey Park: 1. Trails (10'; stone dust) 2. Landscaping Total D. Taylor Tract: 1. Trails 2. Below Grade Road Crossing Total E. Shell Park: 1. Trails (10'; stone dust) 2. Tree Planting (0.2 Acres) Total F. Utilities: Total for Phase II: 1,700 L.F. 3,200 L.F. 200 L.F. Phase III: A. Merriman Road Soccer Complex: B. Racewa~(Plastics One) Parcel: 1. Multi-Purpose Field -Lighting (30 F.C.) 2. Baseball /Softball Fields -Lighting (30 120 F.C.) 3. Restroom Building (masonry) Total $ 22,000.00 18,000.00 35,000.00 200,000.00 40,000.00 5.000.00 $ 320,000.00 $ 17,000.00 5.000.00 $ 22,000.00 $ 32,000.00 30.000.00 $ 62,000.00 - $ 2,000.00 1.500.00 $ 3,500.00 -0- $ 432,500.00 -0- $ 60,000.00 115,000.00 70.000.00 $ 245,000.00 21 C. Starkey Park: D. Taylor Tract: E. Shell Park: F. Utilities: (Water, sewer, and electrical power) Total Total Phase III: TOTAL SCHEME "B": -o- -0- -0- $ 50.000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 295,000.00 $1,166,250.00 22 ' VIII. PARKLAND AND FACILITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT: A. INTRODUCTION: In October 1996, parks and recreation staff presented to the Board of Supervisors a status report on the Park master plan program as developed and implemented in 1986. Included in this report was a specific update on each plan that included the numerous improvements completed as part of the 1992 general obligation bond referendum and other non bond related capital projects. As a result of this meeting the Board directed Parks and Recreation staff to perform a parks and facility needs assessment to allow for an update of both the Comprehensive Plan for Parks and the Parks and Recreation master plans. Outlined below are the relevant results of this process which identify overall countywide park and recreation needs, and more specifically, documents the need for a district park in the south county area. B. PARKLAND: 1. In reviewing parkland needs on a countywide basis, staff used the Virginia State Spatial Standards as outlined in the Virginia Outdoors Plan. The Outdoors Plan recommends 10 acres of parkland per 1,000 population distributed in the following way: Chart A: State Parkland Standards Potential Service Radius Type of Park Acres Per 1000 Persons Suburban Rural Min. Acres/ Park Neighborhood 3 1/2 mile 1 1-1/2 miles 5 Community 3 1 mile 3-7 miles 20 District 4 5-7 miles 10-15 miles 50 2. According to the 1991 Census, Roanoke County had a population of 79,332. Based on this population and the state standard, Roanoke County should have 793 acres of parkland. Existing County Parkland by magisterial district and park type is as follows. Please note that the following charts do not include school and special use park facilities. 23 Chart B: Existing Park Acreage Neighbor- hood Community District Total Acres Total Acres per 1,000 persons CAVE SPRING 43.07 0.00 0.00 43.07 2.73 HOLLINS 5.00 20.00 50.00 75.00 4.53 WINDSOR HILLS 0.00 27.00 0.00 27.00 1.71 VINTON 21.00 4b.41 74.30 141.71 9.16 CATAWBA 5.00 20.00 165.00 190.00 12.10 TOTAL: 74.07 113.14 289.30 476.78 3. As the previous chart indicates, four of five magisterial districts show a park land deficit, with a severe shortage in the Hollins, Windsor Hills, and Cave Spring Districts. The chart below identifies park acreage needed, by park type in each Roanoke County magisterial district. Chart C: Acres Needed Neighbor- hood Community District Total Acres needed by District Existing Total Acres Variance from Standard CAVE SPRING 47.33 47.33 63.10 157.76 43.07 -114.69 HOLLINS 49.70 49.70 66.27 165.67 75.00 -90.67 WINDSOR HILLS 47.44 47.77 63.26 158.14 27.00 -131.14 VINTON 46.41 46.41 61.88 154.70 141.71 -12.99 CATAWBA 47.12 47.12 62.82 157.05 190.00 32.95 TOTAL: 238.00 238.00 317.33 793.32 476.78 -316.54 24 ~ ~. i FACII.ITIES: 1. While State facility standards set average goals for park types, actual recreational facility needs can vary significantly from locality to locality, based on community priorities, traditional usage patterns, and a number of other demographic factors. For example, retirement oriented communities would have fewer ball and soccer fields but more trails and indoor space. For the purposes of this report, parks and recreation staff have provided the following facility inventories for each magisterial district. This inventory includes both Roanoke County Parks and Recreation and School owned park facilities. A summary Chart follows and Individual District Inventories can be found at the end of this Section. 2. Recreation Facilities, like parkland, vary from district to district. A review of this information, coupled with participation statistics on a countywide basis, have helped identify the various facility needs of the community, and have guided the master plan process. 3. One area that is considered a high priority by both citizens and the Board, is youth athletics. The increase in participation over the past five years has placed a strain on facilities in some areas of the community. While the 1992 Bond program solved many of the problems, there are still inequities in the County. For example, since 1991 participation in girls' softball in South County has increased by over 100%, from 17 to 46 teams, while growth in other areas has remained stable. Obviously, this type of growth has an impact on facilities. Listed below is statistics on the number of teams versus fields in recreation club areas for baseball /softball and soccer. 4. Chart E. Teams versus Fields Available ' Sport *Baseball /Softball Area # of Teams # of Fields North Roanoke / Masons Cove 69 14 (3 lighted) South County 125 18 (8 lighted) Vinton / Mt. Pleasant 67 13 (8 lighted) Glenvar 28 5 (3 lighted) 25 i~ I r *Soccer North Roanoke / Masons Cove 41 6 (1 lighted) South County 66 11 (3 lighted) Vinton / Mt. Pleasant 53 9 (5 lighted) Glenvar / Masons Cove 17 3 Lights expand the capacity of a ballfield by two teams, i.e. an unlit baseball field will support 6 teams, a lighted field 8. Alighted soccer field expands capacity by two or more teams depending on the division and size of field. BASEBALL /SOFTBALL FACILITIES: 5. In comparison to other areas of the County, South County has significantly less fields per number of baseball /softball teams than in any other area in the county. In addition, baseball and softball teams from Cave Spring High School utilize parks facilities for both games and practices, creating overuse and scheduling problems. These teams are not included in the chart. The proposed master plan has responded to these documented deficiencies and identifies baseball /softball fields as a major priority in the phasing plan for implementation. This point is only emphasized due to several major residential developments slated for the service area. SOCCER FACII,ITIES: ' 6. The recent addition of the Merriman complex has increased the overall field capacity for soccer in South County. However, as in baseball and softball, continued growth in the program could require additional fields in the near future. ' The master plan acknowledges that potential and includes additional multi-purpose field areas that allow a flexible response to these future facility needs. ' SUMMARY: ' 7. The significant deficit of existing parkland and related recreation facilities; the growth of youth sports teams; and the planned residential growth in South County all indicate an immediate need for a facility as proposed in the master plan report. ' It is important to note that South County, with its significant population density and development, is the only area of the county without a district park. 1 26 1 H U H N J W H Q m N W J V 0 . N N v ~ O ~ ~ N 00 c O U n E N O N: N: ~: ~-: ~: I` ~ O N C ~ ~~ N~ 'M 'N; M N N ~ ca a ~ N'. N M. N mot: ~ rn N to T N N ~ `d' M: ~ C~ ...... V N . . i m > ~ N N o0 ~ N , n`_ ~ N fA ~ U O. ~ ~ ~. O~ M H ~ O ~ 'a : : ~ ~ -: ` ~ ~ O; N `caw ° ~ ~ o ~ Y o ~ M M M CO ~ ~ O `~ U O ~ m a~ N u ~ ~~ (A - ~ ~ N 7 ~ ~ (~ ~ N N~ a~ ~; °.~ O :r: N r: N r: N L1') O fD ~ lL CO ~: J: N J ~ Z' ' _. ~ ca .N: Q~ : -: O~ : Q: 27 c 0 N N U r : r C O U n E ~ O r:r: ~ O CO ti ~ C :.....:..... ...... ....:...... ~ O ~ ~~ :r:r: N a o ................... ...... ...............:.... ...... ........... ~. c n o ~ a a ~ rr a a~ ~ o ~ ~ c o O ~ .... a, -, U ~ , A N a~ ~ ~ ~ 'c Q ~ U M:M: U ~~ ~~ V ~ ~ ~~ r L ~ O Q a Y ~ : : ~ U r r ~ O N m : : ~ U ~ .... .... . c L ~ U r:r:N:M O ~ ~ ±+ ~ (n ~ ~ ~ i ! ! ~ i ~ ~ O Q ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ LL M:~' m ~ (D ~ +' ~ ~ '(fl N N N: ~ ~ ~ ~ Q tp:N:~ r' r i th : d. N: ~ Q C a Y ? D O Y ~ cn c y o ; O U ~ ,c; o: c Q d W , c; o; O o ~, ca Z : a~: m :~: N E; ~ v W ;~ cu ~,; ~..: ~. ~ E N W :U:~':~:~: O : W :CO: z ~ _ _:. o :r lri r : r ire i N(~Jir l(') N ~:~ N:~:~: ~: 0:~: ~:M. O H ~ N: +.: O , ~ ~ m Q . U ~:L: cn w~ ;W=~ W ~ J rn: rn: rn >, m ~ ~ U O Q c: c: c •c•c;~c; Y:- o: ~ ~ Q ~ _ Q. a: fl.: cncn u~; o : ~ , ~ c U W N: N: O: O:.Y ~ ~ N : _ ~ : N tB: N: : : a v Q ;UU;U U c~ m cn ; .. .. _ cn n. :. J H O 28 c O '~ U C O U ' ~ ~ ~ `~ o ~ci a i r- ~ ~ O C (0 O ~ C O i i 7 Q 'j ~ r: O a d .. ... ,v ~ ~, c~ o n. .-. ~~ ~ ~ J J ~ C~ V . -~. ~' a~ ~~ ~ c , ~ ~ M: HU ' is ~ ~' o v ~~ N ............. . ~ ~~~ O ~ ~ d ~ ~U N m e~4 ~ :.... ...... :....: CC C ~ a U ~ M ' _ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ' 'O ~ N Q~LL ~~a N ~ ~ N: ~LL m - ~ ~ _ ... . U ~: N : ~ ('V Q . ..:.....:.....:.. N ...:..... : .... ~ a o ' D Y ~ a~i O ; a : cn O ~ ~ - 1 m ; _ ~ U W : 2 ; ~ V // ~~ O ~- N ~ ~: M r-: N .- ~ N .-- .- N ~: '~: ~ 0 M N ' to O T O N `'_ : ~ T f0 'd C 7 LA : ~ In (p ~ In : ~ o ~ (0 M:~ ~ ~: N: pj r N r ~ (0 (d .... f0 (/~ ~' ~ ~ a o a ~~ o O c~ a~i O W ~ U ~ > 5 cn w a i cn i a cn ~ 3 o~ Z ~ >,: ~ ~ cn; Y ~, O ~ J 2 V O io ~ ~ ~:'o O L. vi o a: a: co ~ g c .: ~:~ . U .~: p W : : U ~.: O . C:~:Y ~: ~ yL.~ ~ ~a m ~ Z J Z __ 29 c 0 . ~ y ~ U C O U .... :...........:......:.... : : : : :.. : : : : i N r.+ r . . ...... ..... ...... ..... ...... ..... ...... ... ~. ........... ........... N -~ ~ (' U (A V) c` ~, a O - ~~ 'c ~ ~ U .- ~ H is w ~ ~ ~ ~ o. r ~ y s ............................ ...................... ...... D ° ~~ o ~~Y ~ ~ ~ U O ~ m + + N : : N ~ N ..... .... ..... C G U ~ ~: O ~ N ~ ._ ~p to a ~ ~ v ~ a~ Q ~ ~ ~ -Na ~ ~ ~ ~ LL ~ ~ ~p m ~ v ~ o N : o: ~ ilA i ~ Q cB O F- c 0 0: U ~ O a Y cn y O ~ Q W ~ a~ O ~ -o Z; m:~: m ~~ Y V;c o: W: V ~ i moo. O ~;~: ; V a w: n m ~ W z: ....:... ;..... V ..... 4 ..... es'....: ~: ~:N:~: r: p ~: Mrn:~ N o ~:~: ~ r ~: I- ~- c c 0 0 Q: N O N cn w cn ~ a~ W z U ~ c: o ~:- c ~ Q ~: o J a ~"' U J .: o ; rn: O ~ D O cn c ~ ' >.5; u i W . V = ~ ..: ~ o rn:o T C O ~ y N ~' to O ~ O ~ r ~ ~ ~ J c Q o H ~ O ~ (9 ca E ~, rn c 0 2 30 c 0 ' ......................... .......... ........................ N a~ U C O U iE ......:.....:.....:.....: ....:..... ......:.....:.....:..... a~ o ~ o ~ o ° c ~ o ~n = •> O N D. ...... ~ ~, C a o . N 0 a rn ~ n . m ~ ~ ~ N .-. U N m N ~. a H c ~ o V ~ H U ~ ~ ~ a ~.+ v °o ~ I.L ~ ~ o ~ ~ U ~ O N m ~ ~ a~ ....:....:. C G U ~ ~ O ~ ~ ......L.....;.....i.....i .... L. _. .....;..... i.....i.... II •= f0 N 7 ~ ~ "p ~ N Q ~ r': ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ IL ~ m U ~ iOi N: Q Q Y ~: ~ Q N: N; C: O ~ a.; ~ U c O ~ a 3 c~: ~ ~ ~ : a: ~ a U 0 ~c 5 w ; m Z .:.....:.....:..... :....:..... V .:.....:.....:..... _II N M ~ ~! ~ ~ ~: ~ to- c 0 U N ~ ~ Q : W U 'c W V ~ i-- °: ~ W 0 :......:.. ... ~ :.....:..... it r M N N ~ d' ~e-~~:~:N :~~~:~ pp v ~ ~ ~ ~ N c~ ~ : -- : - 1A . ~ O: ~ ch '~ ~r ~ N r ~n ~ ~ o - O ~ ti C ~ : r- ri : ~ M ~ N M ~ C ~ ~ ~ N ~ 'U H Fo- H J Q ~ ~ ~ 0 H ~3 N N C '''' ' ; c ~ ~ ~ O: N ~c : ~ ~ w C: O a~ : ~: ~ ~ , ~ N w : o: ~ u1 Z 3 E:~:.- o L. ~ ~: ~:_: > ~: m Y ~ ~ " U ~ ~:= J ~ L: ~: O: a: N (~ ~ aoi O J: C i C ;~' O ~~i O ~: cn ~;0: W : O 31 c 0 . .... ................................... ...................... N U ~: ~: C O U n E m o .- ~ o c 0 o ~ ~ v_ d ~ ~ o m o :.r co o.. rn a ° m ~ a ~ ~ (~ ~' C~ .... ..... .... U ~ . : ` T ~ ~ ~C ~ ~ ~ M:N d': F- U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.+ o ~ ~' ~~. ti N _.. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U O ~~ N .- m N C G U ~ ~ N; O ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ '~ ~ ~ '~: Q ~ L.L ~ ~ ~ N ~ N N•-- •-- e-:N: ~ ~ ~ m ~ 0 ~ O ~~- ~~~'r~ ~ ~:~: ti ~Ni Q : ~: a; .~, N i Ci iY: ~ cv : ~ : ~: ~ ~ ca -o: O' ca: ~;m, ~ Z:'c: _ _ ~ o: N W ~ ~:~:~ O ~:U Z ......~... ~....~.........C) .....:........ .-; I I !M ~: M M ~~ r ~ ~ ~~~~ O: ;N: L(') N i r fB f9 ~ F- ~ F- o Y : o ~ ' U N Q : U N (n ~ (A Q N ~: ~; ~ ~' V . ~ W a~: U J ~. ~: am. Q :cu: W U u.l O .....;.... .. ;....... .. N . *.. _ ... N ~ ~: c; co ; ~: m ~: U U O ~II~ N Y O C N (0 r ~ O r ~ ti ~ tq T ~ r ~ J ~ Q ~ O ~~ ~"~ ~ a a~ c 3 0 c 0 c 32 APPENDIX 33 O~ pOANpt.~ °v a t838 DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION PETE HAISLIP, DIRECTOR Apri122, 1997 Terry Langford 5940 Merriman Rd. Roanoke, VA 24v i 8 Dear Terry: Thank you for agreeing to serve on the citizens committee to help plan a district park for Southwest County. This is going to be an exciting project that will benefit the citizens of Roanoke County for years to come. It is my expectation that the process will require two committee meetings and a final one to present the plan to the Board of Supervisors and the general public. The first meeting has been scheduled for Wednesday, April 30 at 6:00 p.m. at the Brambleton Center. (map enclosed) Light refreshments will be served. Please let us know if you will be unable to attend, by calling Nicole at 387-6078. Again, thank you for volunteering your time, and I look forward to working with you on this project. Sincerely, ~~t~~ ~~4~/~ Pete Haislip, Director cc: Mark Courtright, Asst. Director of Parks Bob Guthrie, Supervisor, Youth Athletics Stuart Connock, Resource Planners 1 206 KESSLER MILL ROAD • SALEM, VIRGINIA 24153 • (540) 387-6078 ® Recycled Paper ~ ~ RECREATION DESIGN ARCHITECTURE LANDSCAPE ARCI~TECTURE . ENGINEERING RESOURCE PLANNERS, INC. May 2, 1997 NOTES OF CI'TIZEN'S COMMITTEE MEETING NO. ONE PROJECT: Southwest District Pazk Master Plan Study Roanoke County, Virginia LOCATION: Brambleton Center TIlVIE: Apri130, 1997 - 6:00 P.M. ATTENDEES: Roanoke Countv Pazks and Recreation: Pete Haislip Nicole Delany Resource Planners. Inc. Stuart W. Connock, Jr. John R. McCutcheon, Jr. ~tizen's Committee: Lee Blair Liz Belcher Paul Bailey Bill Skelton Bob Guthrie Geraldine Bazber Jim McAden Mazk Courtright Kazen Griffith Terry Langford Kip Connelly David Holiday Pete Haislip convened the meeting and provided an introduction to the project describing the site location and ownership and introduced the Consultant, Resource Planners, Inc. 3111 NORTHSIDE AVENUE (804) 261-6967 RICHIVIOND, VIRGINIA 23228 FAX (804) 2643464 ' May 2, 1997 Page 2 ' tuazt Connock described the site and its im rtant features includin S po g ' 1. Topography 2. Waterways 3. Floodway and floodplain ' 4. Soils 5. Roadways and access 6. Concept of linking three existing parks to create a lazge district pazk. Stuart Connock continued with a list of goals and objectives: ' 1. Address need for active athletic facilities such as baseball and football. 2. Provide a balance of less structured recreational azeas for activities such as picnicking, strolling and nature study. ' 3. Seek public input and support. 4. Address future needs. 5. Evaluate overall programming of all recreational activities throughout district to investigate potential for shifting programs at existing sites to this new facility. 6. Optimize use of the site's existing built and natural features. 7. Develop cost estimate and strategy for phasing and funding including sources outside the County. ' itizen C 's Committee defines a "wish list" of oals and facilities desired: g ' 1. Development of creekways as a natural feature. 2. Facilities for the disabled, not exclusively for those in wheelchairs. 3. Development of written goals and objectives that can be checked at the end of the project to ' ascertain the committee's degree of success at goal implementation. 4. Support for a process in which land developers would share in the cost of providing athletic and recreational facilities needed for the increasing residential population. 5. Passive recreation azeas which aze not in conflict with active athletics such as baseball or soccer. 6. A facility that establishes a focal point for Southwest County. 7. A facility that responds to the nearby Blue Ridge Pazkway. ' 8. 9. Revenue generation. A plan that is balanced between active and passive recreation uses, flexible to respond to future needs and that serves the greatest number of people. 10. Provide azeas undisturbed by parking lots. 11. Coordination of this committee's work with that of the Blue Ribbon School Committee. 12. Quick action to build as soon as possible. 13. Provide facilities with a range of activities for entire families to utilize. 14. Pedestrian access to and through the pazk. ' 15. Shaded parking azeas. 16. Attention to use by the elderly. 17. Walking trail circuits of vazying lengths. 18. Facilities that contribute to the educational use of the pazk. D:\WPDOCSURM\PLN\SWESTDP1.520 June 23, 1997 Page 2 B. Concept IIA: High School Stadium and Sports Complex Facilities proposed at Taylor Tract support a program of "game day" use by high school sports teams. Prominent features support 2,500 seat stadium and 385 car parking lot. C. Concept IIB: High School Sports Complex Facilities proposed at Taylor Tract support a program of game use by high school sports teams. (No stadium, smaller parking area.) D. Concept III: High School Facilities proposed at Taylor Tract support a high school building and associated roads, parking, fields, stadium, etc. Starkey park becomes a baseball and soccer field site associated with the school. Crystal Creek Road is broken to unify the separate sites. E. Concept Plans were discussed as they were presented. Issues discussed included: 1. Need for designed open spaces other than the spaces between two adjacent facilities. 2. Need for a maintenance yard in all concept approaches. 3. Spillover light from sports lighting. 4. Appropriate numbers of parking spaces provided. 5. Noise from the park disturbing neighboring residences. (Amphitheater) 6. Traffic noise disturbing park activities. (Amphitheater) 7. Location and size of amphitheater. 8. Connection of trails to surrounding trail systems. 9. Football, soccer and multi-use field design and use. 10. Focal point establishing character and identity of the park. IV. How to Proceed: A. Increasing population and present over-crowding of existing Park facilities require immediate action by committee. All agree that formulation of a plan should not wait on school board to officially adopt Taylor Tract as High School sports complex. ~ ~ RECREATION DESIGN ARCHITECTURE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE .ENGINEERING RESOURCE PLANNERS, INC. June 23, 1997 NOTES OF CITIZEN'S C011~IlVII11'EE MEETING NO. TWO PROJECT: Southwest District Pazk Starkey, Roanoke County, Virginia Master Plan Study LOCATION: County Administration Building DATE: June 11, 1997 - 6:00 - 8:00 P.M. ATTENDEES: Pete Haislip Bob Guthrie Paul Bailey Geraldine Barber Kip Connelly Jim McAden David Holladay Liz Belcher Karen Griffith Stuart W. Connock, Jr. John R. McCutcheon, Jr. I. Pete Haislip convened the meeting and noted that it appears that the School Board will very likely build a high school sports complex on the Taylor Tract. Ownership of the parcels under study was briefly discussed. II. Stuart W. Connock, Jr. and John R. McCutcheon, Jr. presented Concept Design plans. A. Concept I: District Park All facilities proposed support a program of active and passive recreation for general recreational use. 3111 NORTHSIDE AVENUE (804) 261-6967 RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23228 FAX (804) 264-3464 ii 1 June 23, 1997 Page 3 B. 1 1 C. All agree to produce two alternative plans for District Pazk: 1. District Pazk which provides for recreational /athletic needs (no school use of Taylor Tract) with a balance of spaces for less structured, passive recreation similar to Concept Plan I. 2. District Pazk with active and passive recreational facilities with athletic facilities on the Taylor Tract that will support the high school stadium similar to Concept Plan IIA. Athletic facilities will be shared by school and Recreation and Pazks teams with consideration of phased approach to stadium, high density sports complex on Taylor Tract. The schemes illustrated will not be two separate plans, but two alternatives to the design of a community based District Pazk. These notes constitute our understanding of matters discussed and conclusions reached. If these items are not in accordance with our discussions, please advise the undersigned of any errors or omissions within five days of receipt. Respectfully Submitted By: RESOURCE PL~~]VNERS, INC. ~• ' /~ /~„ John R. McCutcheon, Jr., CLA, ASLA Project Manager D:\WPDOCSURM\PLMCCOMIvfrG2.520 o~ ROANp~~ C~~a~xx~# ~~ ~~xxr~.~.~ °v a 1836 DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION PETE HAISLIP, DIRECTOR ~,~ ~' .~<~- i~ To: Southwest District Park Citizens Planning Committee ~~ -~.~ u I~ ~ --------------•------- 997 Re: Project Update From: Pete Haislip Date: August 11, 1 As reported in my last letter, Roanoke County had made an offer on a piece of property adjacent to the proposed park The offer has been accepted and barring unforeseen environmental problems the County is proceeding with the purchase. This land, highlighted in red on the enclosed drawings, is valuable to the project as it could provide access to the Back Creek portion of the new park, from both Starkey and Merriman Roads. This definitely impacts the final design. To that end, the consultant developed two new park concepts (enclosed for your review) incorporating the new property. These new designs deal only with that area behind Plastics One, along Back Creek between Starkey and Merriman Parks. They include all the amenities the committee agreed upon at our second meeting. These concepts were presented at the July 30 meeting. Committee members present liked the designs and felt it was something we could move forward with. If you have any comments about these plans please forward them to me at your earliest convenience. I will forward them to Resource Planners so they can complete the plans and related report. A copy of the final document will be forwarded to you as soon as it is received by Parks and Recreation. I would like to have it finalized in the next couple of weeks so we can get it to the Board of Supervisors, hopefully in September. I will notify you in plenty of time so everyone can try to be at that meeting. We may even ask a committee member to help with the presentation. Thank you again for your time and effort. I am truly excited about this project and the benefits it will provide county residents. I hope to see all of you in September. 1206 KESSLER MILL ROAD • SALEM, VIRGINIA 241 53 • (540) 387-6078 ® Recycled Paper 0~ ROANp,~.~ ~. .~ Z v a 1838 TO: FROM: DATE: ~.~r~.txY~ ~~ .~~x~~.~.~e DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION PETE HAISLIP, DIRECTOR Southwest County District Park Master Plan Committee Members -_,r ~~ Pete Haislip~ ~ ~/"' „ ,,,... September 12, ~-- ~ ,~'~~._~~~" a ` RE: Master Plan Presentation The plan is complete! Thanks to all of you, Roanoke County has an excellent master plan to present to the Board of Supervisors. I have included draft copies of the final layout. As you can see, it is what we all agreed upon, especially the green space, trails, and passive recreation areas. I would like to invite all of }'ou to the September 23 Board of Supervisors meeting for the presentation. It will be early on the agenda, so please plan on being there at 3:00 p.m. Hopefully, many of you will be able to attend and be publicly acknowledged for your work. Resource Planners is wrapping up the final report and I hope to be able to send you one prior to the meeting. Again, thanks for your contribution and I hope to see you on the 23rd! cc: Roanoke County Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Members Mark Courtright, Assistant Director of Parks Bob Guthrie, Supervisor, Youth Athletics 1206 KESSLER MILL ROAD • SALEM, VIRGINIA 24153 • (540) 387-6078 ® Recycled Paper 1 C' ii C AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON SEPTEMBER 23, 1997 RESOLUTION 092397.8 CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board cc: File Executive Session File AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON SEPTEMBER 23, 1997 RESOLUTION CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. 1 .' S ^' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 1997 ORDINANCE 092397-9 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO MICHAEL PRUDEN FOR CFW NIRELESS TO CONSTRUCT A COMMUNICATIONS TOWER AT 6332 FRANKLIN ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 107.00-2-19), CAVE SPRING MAGISTE- RIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Michael Pruden for CFW Wireless has filed a petition to construct a communications tower located at 6332 Franklin Road (Tax Map No. 107.00-2-19) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on August 5, 1997; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on July 22, 1997; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on August 19, 1997, and this matter was continued to September 23, 1997. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Michael Pruden for CFW Wireless to construct a communications tower located at 6332 Franklin Road (Tax Map No. 107.00-2-19) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1-456 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved with the following conditions: 1. The height of the tower structure, excluding any antenna attached to the structure, shall not be more than 152 feet. No microwave or other dish type antenna shall be allowed on the tower. This structure shall be constructed to accomodate a structure capable of being increased to 195 feet; however, the tower structure shall not be increased to 195 feet unless the increase is required to accomodate co-location of equipment for another vendor/provider, and any increase shall be subject to an additional special use permit application. 2. The tower structure and all attached support hardware shall be painted a flat matted color so as to better blend into the landscape and reduce visibility and light reflection. 3. No lighting shall be installed on the tower structure or equipment building except for security lighting not to exceed a height of 25 feet in height. 4. This tower shall be structurally designed to carry sufficient loading and the site developed to accommodate the additional buildings necessary to accommodate co- locating of communications equipment of at least one other vendor/provider in order to minimize the proliferation of towers in the vicinity of this site. In addition, by executing the special use permit requested, the applicant agrees to make the tower available for lease within the structural capacity of the tower and at reasonable costs adequate to recover the capital, operating and maintenance costs of the tower location required for the additional capacity. 5. If the use of the tower structure for wireless communications is discontinued, the tower structure shall be dismantled and removed from the site within 30 days of notice by the County and the special use permit shall become void. 6. Any damage to the existing road, resulting from the construction or operation of the tower, shall be repaired at the expense of the petitioner. 7. Public emergency communications equipment shall be accommodated at no expense to the County. 8. The applicant shall install a locked gate at the entrance to the private right-of-way. 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning y classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance with revised conditions, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTS: Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board cc: File Arnold Covey, Engineering and Inspection Terry Harrington, Planning and Zoning John Birckhead, Real Estate Assessments Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney • I ~ ~,rr Roanoke County Department of Planning Memorandum TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Terrance L. Harrington, AICP ?iU~ Director of Planning DATE: September 18, 1997 RE: Request of CFW Inc. For a Special Use Permit to Construct a Broadcasting Tower in the Red Hill Area of Roanoke County At the Board of Supervisors meeting on August 26, the Board tabled this item for 30 days to allow the staff and applicant the opportunity to conduct a balloon test to determine the visibility of the tower from various advantage points in this part of the county. Balloon tests were conducted on the morning of September 16 and in the afternoon on September 18th. Fog on the morning of the 16th prohibited seeing the balloon during the early morning hours. Balloon Location and Elevation The balloon was elevated at a location approximately 20o yards from the actual site of the proposed tower. The enclosed map shows the exact location of the balloon in relation to the site. A closer location was not possible due to existing tree cover in the area of the site that prohibited the flying of the balloon. You will recall that CFW's application is for a 150 tower. The Planning Commission has recommended that the tower be up to 170 feet in height to increase the potential for the co-location of other wireless vendors. The site chosen for the balloon test was approximately 100 feet lower in base elevation than the tower site. For this reason the balloon was raised to a height of 270 feet above base elevation. Based upon the balloon test, the tower will be visible to north and southbound traffic on Route 220, and from numerous vantage points on Crowells Gap Road and Red Hill Road. It will also likely be very visible from many properties on the west and east sides of Route 220 that lie above the Route 220 corridor. Overall V '' visibility of the tower for these property owners will be effected primarily by what is in the foreground of their view, as opposed to the location of the tower. Based upon our driving through the area, it does not appear that the tower will be visible from Yellow Mountain Road, Bandy Road, or any portion of the Blue Ridge Parkway. Based upon the terrain close to Route 220, it appears that the tower will be visible to travelers for short periods of time. The balloon was visible for less than 30 seconds when traveling south on Route 220, and for approximately the same length of time when traveling north. Because of the offset in location between the tower and balloon site, actual visibility from this road may be slightly more or less. Residents and travelers on Crowells Gap Road will see the tower for the greatest period of time. Due to its proposed location, west bound traffic in Crowells Gap Road will have multiple views of the tower as they head towards Route 220. If the tower was constructed to the 150 height requested by CFW, visibility on 220 would likely be reduced. However, staff does not believe that the lower height would significantly reduce the towers visibility for property owners or travelers on Crowells Gap. PETITIONER: MICHAEL PRUDEN FOR CFW WIRELESS S - ~ CASE NUMBER: 21-7/97 Planning Commission Hearing Date: August 5, 1997 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: August 19, 1997 A. REQUEST Petition of Michael Pruden for CFW Wireless for a Special Use Permit to construct a communications tower, located at 6332 Franklin Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS R. A. House asked about the frequency to be used on the tower and whether it might interfere with the one and only tv channel he now receives at his residence. Ron Harrison wanted to know where the tower will be located? Leroy Hurt asked about the access on Red Hill Road, the type of road surface and how it will be maintained, with staff indicating that it was to be an all weather gravel road. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION In response to Commission inquiries, the applicant indicated that the antenna would consist of 4' X 6' panels and would not include any dishes at this time. CFW indicated they had explored the GTE site on Murray's Knob and determined that it would not cover the area between the Franklin-Roanoke County line and their other antenna on the water tank near the Blue Ridge Parkway. Copies of the radio frequency modeling were provided to staff. The Commission discussed at length the issues of co-locating, increasing the height of the tower to provide additional space for co-locating (each provider needing 15-20 foot separation), and what public and private policies were needed to encourage co-location. Also discussed was the general visibility of the proposed site, what color the structure should be to best blend with the mountainous backdrop (galvanized,"buff, or dark color). D. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS 1. Prior to approval of this site, CFW shall submit to the County radio signal modeling for the existing GTE site located just inside Franklin County on Murray Knob for evaluation by the County's Radio Frequency Engineering subconsultant. Further development of the Red Hill Road site shall only move forward upon written confirmation from the County's subconsultant that the Murray Knob site will not reasonably provide coverage for the Route 220 South corridor otherwise covered by the proposed site. 2. The height of the tower structure, excluding any antenna attached to the structure, shall be at least 160 feet, but not more than 175 feet. No microwave or other dish type antenna shall be allowed on the tower. 3. The tower structure and all attached support hardware, including any microwave dishes shall be painted a flat matted color so as to better blend into the landscape and reduce visibility and light reflection. S-1 4. No lighting shall be installed on the tower structure or equipment building except for security lighting not to exceed a height of 25 feet in height. 5. This tower shall be structurally designed to carry sufficient loading and the site developed to accommodate the additional buildings necessary to accommodate co- locating of communications equipment of at least one other vendor/provider in order to minimize the proliferation of towers in the vicinity of this site. In addition, by executing the special use permit requested, the applicant agrees to make the tower available for lease within the structural capacity of the tower and at reasonable costs adequate to recover the capital, operating and maintenance costs of the tower location required for the additional capacity. 6. If the use of the tower structure for wireless communications is discontinued, the tower structure shall be dismantled and removed from the site within 30 days of notice by the County and the special use permit shall become void. 7. Any damage to the existing road, resulting from the construction or operation of the tower, which renders the road impassable shall be repaired at the expense of the petitioner. 8. Public emergency communications equipment shall be accommodated at no expense to the County. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Witt moved to recommend approval of the request with conditions. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Witt, Robinson, Thomason, Hooker, Ross NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report _ Other /''~.~~ Terrance H ngton cretary Roanoke ounty Planning Commission °~ FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS TO SUPPORT APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT PETITION: CFW WIRELESS INC. PC CASE #: 21-7/97 FINDINGS OF FACT: The site of the proposed tower is located in an area zoned AG-1. Special Use Permits are required for broadcasting towers in AG-1 zoning districts. 2. The location chosen for the proposed tower is on a minor ridge line in the Red Hill area of Roanoke County. A from certain view points, a main ridge of the Blue Ridge will serve as a visual backdrop for this proposed tower. 3. The proposed site is accessible by an existing logging road. Thus, no new roads are necessary to provide access to the site. 4. CFW's initial Roanoke Valley network will be comprised of 10 sites, eight of which have been located without the necessity of constructing a tower. The current proposal is the first tower proposal of CFW in Roanoke County, Roanoke City, Salem or Vinton. The eight previous CFW sites in the Valley have been achieved by co-locations using existing buildings, water tanks, AEP transmission towers, or other wireless towers. Staff analysis of the site and the surrounding area revealed that there does not appear to be any existing structures within this area that would be suitable as a site for a cell location. There are no tall buildings, or AEP towers in this portion of the 220 comdor that would be suitable as an antenna site. The closest existing wireless communications tower is in Franklin County approximately 2 miles south of this site. Bill Graham, Roanoke County's wireless consultant has concluded that the site chosen by CFW is a reasonable tower location. 6. A 150 foot high tower was requested by CFW. The Planning Commission has recommended that the tower be constructed at a height between 160- 175 feet to increase the potential that other wireless providers will be able to co-locate on this structure. Structurally, the tower will be able to accommodate at least one other provider of wireless services. S-~ STAFF REPORT PART I PETITION: M. Pruden for CFW Wireless PREPARED BY: Jon Hartley FILE NO.: 21-7/97 DATE PREPARED: 8/1 /97 A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CFW Wireless is proposing to erect a 150 foot lattice tower on a minor ridge just off of Route 220 South at the end of Red Hill Road to provide wireless communications services primarily to the traveling public along this major transportation corridor. This tower, while the first in Roanoke County along this corridor, would join an existing tower just erected in Franklin County, with a third tower now proposed 100 feet from this second tower in Franklin County. Where co-location is technologically feasible, no new tower should be erected. Where a new tower is necessary to provide service, accommodations for future wireless providers to co-locate should be required. B. DESCRIPTION Petition of Michael Pruden for CFW Wireless to obtain a special use permit to construct a 150 foot wireless communications tower. The tower would be erected on a leased area 40' by 60' located a the end of Red Hill Road. The leased plot is part of a 35 acre parcel that is zoned AG-1 . It is located in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Local Regulations: In the AG-1, Agricultural zoning district, a special use permit must be approved by the Board of Supervisors prior to the installation of a communications or broadcasting tower. The exact height is to be established as a condition of the permit. Additional design standards address lighting, if required by FAA, notification of the FAA and local airport control tower, and setback requirements. In addition to these requirements, site plan review and approval will be required, and approval by VDOT for the commercial access may be necessary. Federal Regulations The Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 was adopted by Congress to accelerate the development of a wireless communications system in this country. In addition to the two existing cellular communications companies allowed in each market, the Act provided for as many as six additional digital communications companies in each market. Recognizing the potential for conflicts with local public policies and regulations, the Act also provided guidance on local zoning authority. The Act preserved local zoning authority in the siting of broadcasting towers, with Section SI 704 setting the following constraints on that local regulation: "I) shall not unreasonably discriminate among providers of functionally equivalent services; and II) shall not prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the provision of personal wireless services." In adopting this language it was the legislative intent to "provide localities the flexibility to treat facilities that create different visual, aesthetic, or safety concerns differently to the extent permitted under generally applicable zoning requirements." The Act also clearly maintains the FCC's jurisdiction over radio frequency emissions and any radio interference. Finally, the Act requires substantial written evidence in a written record for any decision to approve or deny a cell site. PART II A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Topography and Vegetation: The site proposed for the tower is located in a mountainous area of the County just east of Route 220 South. The actual tower compound would be located on a minor ridge with the main Blue Ridge in the background. The area is heavily wooded with a mixture of mature deciduous and coniferous trees with heights of approximately 40 to 60 feet tall. Adjoining and Surroundings Uses: The site is located at the end of Red Hill Road, a gravel road serving four single family residences. An old logging road actually leads to the tower site from the terminus of the gravel road. The adjoining and surrounding area is rural, with widely scattered single family residences along Route 220, and to the north, Crowell's Gap Road. B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Wireless Network Proposed: CFW Wireless, unlike U.S. Cellular and GTE Cellular, is one of as many as six new wireless communications companies to be licensed by the FCC in this area. Where the two "cellular" companies operate as an analog radio system, much like traditional radio systems, CFW will provide a digital service at a higher radio frequency than used by cellular systems. This digital signal allows the receiver to handle voice, beeper and voice mail as an integrated system. This also means that the equipment is smaller, more compact and more computerized. However, this requires that power outputs are lower, and the resulting size of each "cell", that area surrounding each antenna, must be smaller. Where antenna for the Petition: M. Pruden for CFW Wireless 2 File No.: s~ analog cellular systems are usually spaced between 12 and 15 miles apart at initial installation, the digital systems rely on a separation of only 5 to 7 miles. Over the past few months, CFW Wireless has established eight of ten sites necessary to initially cover the Roanoke Valley. All of these sites have been co-locations using existing structures including buildings, water tanks, and AEP electric transmission line towers. The two remaining sites needed will require the construction of a tower. One will be a replacement of an existing tower. The only new tower site needed at this time is the site proposed. This site would serve as the southern most "cell" proposed at this time and would cover the Route 220 South corridor. Proposed Site Layout: The proposed tower consists of a 150 foot lattice type structure that would be located just below the crest of the ridge at a base elevation of approximately 1,200 feet. The area to be fenced measures 40 feet by 60 feet, with the long side running parallel to the ridge. The tower would occupy a triangle shaped footprint with approximately 20 feet on each side. The equipment building would occupy a space of approximately 10' by 16'. The entire site would be surrounded by a chain link fence for security purposes. (See attached concept plan.) CFW Wireless has indicated a willingness to work with Roanoke County in developing this site, including erecting alternative pole styles, such as a mono-pole style structure rather than the lattice structure presently proposed. Other measures, such as requiring a non-reflective color for the structure, could also reduce the visibility of the structure. Access: Access to the site is provided by Red Hill Road, which is maintained by VDOT for approximately 400 feet. Beyond this point it is a private road shared by three existing residences. Beyond the last residence it is further reduced to essentially an old logging road. Improvements to this access will be necessary in order to construct and maintain the tower and communications equipment. However, no new road construction will be necessary to access this site. " Visibility and View Sheds: The location proposed consists of a minor ridge at a base elevation of approximately 1,200 feet with the main Blue Ridge Mountain behind the property at an elevation in excess of 1,900 feet. The 150 foot tower would be surrounded by trees with heights of 40 to 60 feet, leaving 90 to 1 10 feet potentially visible. At the request of staff, the Fifth PDC has prepared a viewshed analysis using a computerized digital terrain model. This analysis shows that the proposed site would be visible, without consideration of vegetation, from just south of Suncrest Heights down Route 220 to as far south as Webb Road (Rt. 615). While modeling shows the site would be visible from the Blue Ridge Parkway, the Parkway is 2.6 miles north of the proposed site. Field inspections indicate that the site and proposed tower would likely be visible along Route 220 from Yellow Mountain Road south to Red Hill Road and would also be seen from Crowell's Gap Road. Petition: M. Pruden for CFW Wireless 3 Fiie No.: S-( Impact on Community Resources: Other than the theoretical visibility of this proposed tower and site being visible from the Blue Ridge Parkway mentioned above, there are no known community, historical or cultural resources that will be adversely impacted by the construction of the proposed tower. Alternative Sites: One other site was seriously considered. It is located on the main ridge of the Blue Ridge Mountain at an elevation of approximately 1,900 feet and is owned by Bill Otey. This alternate site, according to CFW, would require construction of a new road and power line which would be more visible than the improvements needed to make the Red Hill Road site work. The proposed site was also selected because it provides better coverage of the Route 220 corridor. Staff has also observed another wireless communications tower located 2.9 miles south of the proposed site just inside Franklin County at an elevation of 2,094 feet. According to Franklin County officials, this tower was recently erected by GTE Cellular and is 165 feet tall. A second tower is now being proposed by U.S. Cellular within 100 feet of this existing structure. Co-locating with other existing structures is not always feasible because of basic requirements for establishing a wireless cell site. Each site must first be accessible by an all weather road in order to accommodate installation and routine maintenance of the sensitive equipment. Each site must also be served by power and have access to the existing telephone network. Finally not all radio frequencies are compatible with each other and require some separation on the tower structure. The combination of these factors, along with establishing/preserving a "line of sight" which is essential for cellular and PCS systems to function are all essential to making a co-location work. Thus, if an AEP tower has no road access or (ironically) no usable electric power at the site, co-location may not be feasible. C. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND POLICIES The site is located in the Rural Preserve land use category. The policies that apply in this areas do not address communications/broadcasting towers. However, the policies are generally supportive of preserving the rural character. While not officially part of the Comprehensive Plan, preliminary studies have pointed to an increased awareness and concern with the quality of the County's visual resources and the need to protect critical view sheds. In addition, in considering other proposals for communications towers, the Board of Supervisors has strongly encouraged exhausting all other opportunities to collocate before approving new towers. PART I I I Petition: M. Pruden for CFW Wireless 4 File No.: S-! STAFF CONCLUSIONS Consistent with previous actions by the Board, prior to approving the site proposed by CFW on Red Hill Road all opportunities to co-located should be exhausted. Should co- location not be viable, the development of the Red Hill site should only be undertaken in a way that promotes and insures co-location by a future wireless provider along the Route 220 South corridor. The following conditions are proposed with these objectives in mind. 1. Prior to approval of this site, CFW shall submit to the County radio signal modeling for the existing GTE site located just inside Franklin County on Murray Knob for evaluation by the County's Radio Frequency Engineering subconsultant. Further development of the Red Hill Road site shall only move forward upon written confirmation from the County's subconsultant that the Murray Knob site will not reasonably provide coverage for the Route 220 South corridor otherwise covered by the proposed site. 2. The height of the tower structure, excluding any antenna attached to the structure, shall not exceed 150 feet. 3. The tower structure and all attached support hardware, including any microwave dishes shall be painted a dark tone color (grey, green or blue) so as to better blend into the landscape and reduce visibility and light reflection. 4. No lighting shall be installed on the tower structure or equipment building except for security lighting not to exceed a height of 25 feet in height. 5. This tower shall be structurally designed to carry sufficient loading and the site developed to accommodate the additional buildings necessary to accommodate co-locating of communications equipment of at least one other vendor/provider in order to minimize the proliferation of towers in the vicinity of this site. In addition, by executing the special use permit requested, the applicant agrees to make the tower available for lease within the structural capacity of the tower and at reasonable costs adequate to recover the capital, operating and maintenance costs of the tower location. 6. If the use of the tower structure for wireless communications is discontinued, the tower structure shall be dismantled and removed from the site within 30 days of notice by the County and the special use permit shall become void. Petition: M. Pruden for CFW Wireless 5 File No.: COUNTY OF ROANOKE ~~d~f~~'~ DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 5204 Bernard Or. _ _ s~~ P.O. Box 29800 7'ic Roanoke, VA 24018 ( 540` 772-2068 FAX (5401 772-2108 For staff use only ate recei eceived application fe PC/BZA date• placar BOS date:. Case umber.- " ~ ~ - , - - Check type of application filed (check all that apply): IAL USE ^VARIANCE ^ REZONING ~ SP E C R - , . Applicant's name: M~GNAEL `K ~0ti «W t~«cESs Phone: (~o~5y,2-$S ~3 Address: X101 SPR~a6 I.RaE ~+~E "30o WA~INESQoR.o,~jA. 22~ao Zip Code: 229,0 Owner's name: f'AuHc~Et. A. I~JR~y Phone:(5~~~ 989-BnSb Address: ~Sp yeuAw Mowa-tialw ?~. QQp~oy~~Jf1. Zip Code: 24oi~t Location of property: Tax Map Number: 1p1 rJD• Z_ ~c` sE~ a~~~~~ ~~ Magisterial District: CbvE JeR~N(,5 Community Planning Area: C.Lf.Af~6pco~ Size of parcel (s): 3S. SS acres sq.ft. Existing Zoning: aG_ ~ Existing Land Use: tlWase~ Proposed Zoning: ~1C~ - 1 Proposed Land Use: (,~gie,K,.t-~oN i ~~~~ OF P /So' Connrnu~~c.az.cNS Tow~u- ~ RE~Pr'~0 E4M-PMEN'~ For Staff Use On/y Use Type: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES _ C NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES X NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v ws v ws v Consultation 8 1 /2" x 1 1 " concept plan Application fee Application `::~. Metes and bounds description '~;::< Proffers, if applicable Justification ?u Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners l hereby certify that l am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner. . /~ ~ u ~.C~'. -6~z~~47Z o- S- Owner's Signature: ~-- r JUSTIFICATION FOR SPECIAL USE PER:~IIT REQUEST: The Virginia PCS Alliance is a conglomeration of eight telecommunications providers in the state of Virginia. In the recent FCC auctions, VA PCS vas awarded spectrum to establish a PCS or Personal Communications System in'the states of Virginia and West Virginia. CFW Wireless, managing partner of VA PCS is applying for this special use permit to provide coverage of the Rt. 220 corridor as it passes south out of Roanoke County. CFW Wireless, being a Virginia based company, is interested in working with the Roanoke County Planning and Zoning staff, the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors to reach a mutually agreeable location for this tower site. Creating an adversarial environment is neither favorable nor beneficial to CFW or VA PCS. CFWW's current policies allow co-locations on its structures up to the structural limit of the tower and removal of towers that fall into disuse. CFWW has conducted an RF evaluation of the proposed site and has determined that a tower height of 150' is the minimum elevation that can be used and still provide adequate coverage of the area. In addition, this site will not require an easement through a noticeable wooded area to be cut, protecting the view shed. CFW Wireless has worked diligently to co-locate on existing structures in Roanoke County (please see attached map). It is only after exhausting all co-location possibilities that CFWW has requested this special use permit to build a tower. d z a Z ~. Z ~kj c = O Z a O ~~~ U \r~~ O „~ J~~ n s_- ~.. 0~~ L . ~ ~ 0 ..;.::'::: O W NFL r "•:~' .:: ::.::. cn~~ ~ . o W t ~ J ~ ~ v~ ~ ~ Z~Q~~~- /U ~ ~ ` . . ~- 7 1 i l rl ~~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 1997 ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO MICHAEL PRUDEN FOR CFW WIRELESS TO CONSTRUCT A COMMUNICATIONS TOWER AT 6332 FRANKLIN ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 107.00-2- 19), CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Michael Pruden for CFW Wireless has filed a petition to construct a communications tower located at 6332 Franklin Road (Tax Map No. 107.00-2-19) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on August 5, 1997; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on July 22, 1997; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on August 19, 1997, and this matter was continued to September 23, 1997. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Michael Pruden for CFW Wireless to construct a communications tower located at 6332 Franklin Road (Tax Map No. 107.00-2-19) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1-456 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved with the following conditions: 1. The height of the tower structure, excluding any antenna attached to the structure, shall be at least 160 feet, but not more than 175 feet. No microwave or other dish type antenna shall be allowed on the tower. 1 . , ~_ i r 2. The tower structure and all attached support hardware shall be painted a flat matted color so as to better blend into the landscape and reduce visibility and light reflection. 3. No lighting shall be installed on the tower structure or equipment building except for security lighting not to exceed a height of 25 feet in height. 4. This tower shall be structurally designed to carry sufficient loading and the site developed to accommodate the additional buildings necessary to accommodate co-locating of communications equipment of at least one other vendor/provider in order to minimize the proliferation of towers in the vicinity of this site. In addition, by executing the special use permit requested, the applicant agrees to make the tower available for lease within the structural capacity of the tower and at reasonable costs adequate to recover the capital, operating and maintenance costs of the tower location required for the additional capacity. 5. If the use of the tower structure for wireless communications is discontinued, the tower structure shall be dismantled and removed from the site within 30 days of notice by the County and the special use permit shall become void. 6. Any damage to the existing road, resulting from the construction or operation of the tower, shall be repaired at the expense of the petitioner. 7. Public emergency communications equipment shall be accommodated at no expense to the County. 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. C:\OFFICE\WPWIN\WPDOCS\AGENDA\ZONING\CFW.WPD 2 ~JI1lillflllllllllllllllllllllllllllilliillliillllllilllllllllflllllllllllllfill tlllllillllillllllllllllllllllllll1111I111111if111 jjJ _ __ _ _ S ,- AGENDA ITEM NO. ,_ ,~ ,._ ,.. - APPE CE REQUEST v - ._ _ ,_ _ " PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS -_ SUBJECT: ~~D/ylr~1~/~lfCR~7d/l/ ~i/~./(/f'/~~G,C'C/i/,~R~~ c I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND' ADDRESS c FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ,- ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, _ and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. - `~ - a ~ _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ..... _ _ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. i ~ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = with the clerk. __ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GRDUP -' SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. c PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK i ~ 7~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ v.. s ~~ i ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~Itllllllllllllllfllfllfllffilllllillllllllllllttllllllllllfl11111111iflllllllllffllllllfilllfflfllllliflllllilllilllilllifflllfim Ilillillllllilllllillllllllllllllilllllll~lilllillllillilllll IIIIIIIIf11111iIIIIIIiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIli11111111111111111111111111J,1J ^. v ~ S - ,= AGENDA ITEM NO. _,,,~ ,._ - ,~ _. APPE CE REQUEST - ._ ~_ _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE ~ CITIZENS COMMENTS c SUBJECT: ~ A /~4 ,~ ~ ~TU t.elP~ Sf I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the -= meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WREN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND' ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ~-- -- s ~ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. --~ - s ~ a ~ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. ,, Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized e speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave .any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. c ~= ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BF,HALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. c PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK i ~ ~~ ~ !~ ~~ Y~ ~~ ~~ ~~ e ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ^~ ~~ ~11111111111I1111111111111111111111111111111illlllilllllllllllllIIIIIIIillllllllllllilllilllillillilllliflilllilllllllllt11111111m ~Illlliilllllllllillllilllilllllillllillllllllllllllllllllllililllllllllllllillllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllll Illllllllllll~ AGENDA ITEM NO. -1 _. ,._ - APPE CE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE +~ CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: C ~C~ I,c) ~,2. I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND' ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ~-- -_ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to s do otherwise. - ` - s ~ i ~ ^ Speaker will. be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized :~ speaker and audience members is not allowed. ._ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. i ~ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. s ~_ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BF,HALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP c SHALL FILE WITH -THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK ~-- -- a~ s a~ ~~ ~. ~~ ~~ ~ i ~ s~ ~~ ~/ ~. ~ ~~ ~~ ~Illllltillilllillllilillllllllllltllillll llllllllillllllllllllllllllill1111111111111111111111111111111111iftlllllllllllillllllll~ .. ~ ... PETITIONER: ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION CASE NUMBER: 34-9/97 Planning Commission Hearing Date: September 2, 1997 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: September 23, 1997 A. REQUEST Petition of the Roanoke County Planning Commission to amend the zoning ordinance to modify the definition of a private kennel. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS Tim and Kelli Bane asked that the number of dogs allowed be increased so that they could keep their three dogs. Mr. Bane stated that he was not aware of the 2-dog limitation when they purchased the third dog. Greg Reese and Lee Watson also requested that the number of dogs be increased to three. Horace McPherson said that he is opposed to an increase saying that it will create more nuisance; barking dogs. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Commission discussed the number of dogs allowed in other nearby jurisdictions. Mr. Witt commented that he is not a dog owner but will support an amendment to increase the number of dogs allowed. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS None. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Ross moved to recommend approval of the petition. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Robinson, Thomason, Hooker, Witt, Ross NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report Other -~-~ Terrance Harri on, Secr ry Roanoke Co ntv Planni _ Commission ~Roanake County Department of Planning Memorandum TO: Planning Commission /, ~. FROM: Terrance L. Harrington, AICP ~' Director of Planning DATE: August 26, 1997 ~ J ~ I RE: Amendments to Zoning Ordinance; Definition of Private Kennel The Board has asked that code changes be made to increase the number of dogs a resident may have before a private kennel permit is required. Currently, a kennel permit is required for three or more dogs. The Board would like to increase this threshold to four dogs. The zoning ordinance amendment to accomplish this change is below. Also proposed is a change to reduce the age of dogs subject to this definition from six months to ou months. This change is necessitated by state code provisions that allow/require dog licenses for dogs four months or older. The county code has had the four month limitation since 1994. This zoning ordinance change will bring the ordinance into conformity with state enabling provisions and county code. Staff recommends the following change: Definition of Private Rennel RENNEL, PRIVATE - The keeping, breeding, raising, showing or training of t-~rrse f:oitia or more dogs over s-tx four months of age for personal enjoyment of the owner or occupants of the property, and for which commercial gain is not the primary objective. • AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 1997 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING ORDINANCE 82592-12, THE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR ROANOKE COUNTY, BY THE AMENDING SECTION 30-29-2 PERTAINING TO THE DEFINITION OF A PRIVATE RENNEL. WHEREAS, on August 25, 1992, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted Ordinance 82592-12 which enacted a new zoning ordinance for Roanoke County; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission for Roanoke County will hold its public hearing on this amendment on September 2, 1997, and will make a recommendation concerning approval of the ordinance adopting this amendment to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia; and, WHEREAS, in the interest of public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice, the Board of Supervisors hereby amends the use type definition of a private kennel, and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law, and that the first reading of this ordinance was held on August 19, 1997; and the second reading and public hearing will be held on September 23, 1997. BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the Zoning Ordinance for Roanoke County, adopted on August 25, 1992, be, and hereby is, amended and reenacted, as follows: 1. That Section 30-29-2 RESIDENTIAL USE TYPES be amended as follows: • -rev RENNEL, PRIVATE - The keeping, breeding, raising, showing or training of ti~re~e foz`r or more dogs over six ?four months of age for personal enjoyment of the owner or occupants of the property, and for which commercial gain is not the primary objective. • • ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 1997 ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 5-21. DEFINITIONS AND SECTION 5-24. LIMITATIONS ON NUMBER KEPT PER DWELLING UNIT OF ARTICLE II. DOGS, CATS AND OTHER ANIMALS OF CHAPTER 5 ANIMALS AND FOWLS OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO PERMIT THE KEEPING OF AS MANY AS THREE (3) DOGS IN A DWELLING UNIT AND SECTION 30-29-2. RESIDENTIAL USE TYPES (PRIVATE KENNEL) OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE WHEREAS, in the interest of public necessity, convenience, and general welfare, the Board of Supervisors hereby wishes to amend those portions of the Roanoke County Code which establish limits as to the number of dogs which may be kept in any dwelling unit in the county; and WHEREAS, on August 25, 1992, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted Ordinance 82592-12 which enacted a new zoning ordinance for Roanoke County; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission for Roanoke County will hold its public hearing on this amendment on September 2, 1997, and will make a recommendation concerning approval of the ordinance adopting this amendment to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law, and that the first reading of this ordinance was held on August 19, 1997; and the second reading and public hearing will be held on September 23, 1997. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that Article II. DOGS, CATS AND OTHER ANIMALS of Chapter 5, ANIMALS AND FOWLS and S - , Section 30-29-2. RESIDENTIAL USE TYPES of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance be amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 5-21. Definitions. For the purposes of this article, the following words and phrases shall have the meanings ascribed to them by this section, unless otherwise indicated to the contrary: Kennel: An enclosure or structure used to house, shelter, restrain, exercise, board, breed, handle or otherwise keep or care for more than twe-(~} dogs si~{6} months of age or older, from which they cannot escape. The enclosure or structure shall not mean a dwelling or a fence used to demarcate a property line. Sec. 5-24. Limitation on number kept per dwelling unit. (a) The harboring or keeping of more than 1} ~e--(~} dogs over four (4) months of age per dwelling shall be unlawful, unless a private kennel license has been issued pursuant to this article. The harboring or keeping of more than six (6) cats over four (4) months of age, of which no more than two (2) may be fertile, per dwelling shall be unlawful. The requirements of this section shall not apply to any dwelling which is part of an active agricultural operation or usage as defined by the zoning ordinance for the county. 2 . .. s -z Section 30-29-2. RESIDENTIAL USE TYPES of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. Kennel, Private -The keeping, breeding, raising, showing or training of wee f' or more dogs over sip f~ months of age for personal enjoyment of the owner or occupants of the property, and for which commercial gain is not the primary objective. 2. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. c:\wp51 \doc\agenda\animal\animal.ord 3 Illillllllilllllllllllllillillllillilllllllllllllllllllllllliilllllllllillllllill11111111111111111111i1111111111111111111111111111J - - __ AGENDA ITEM NO. .~' s - ~ APPE CE REQUEST _ _ __ ~~ / PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS SUB CT• '~' ~ ~~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Su ervisors to reco nize me during the p g meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND' ADDRESS =_ FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ~-- ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment ,~ whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. - ` - .~ _ a ~ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. ,, _ Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. s ~. s ~ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized ~_ speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. r i ~ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. s ~~ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP = SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. c c PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK -- i ~ ~~ ~ o~ ~ !~ ~ ~~ ~ i ~ ~. ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111i1111111111111111111[111111m ~Illlliilillllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllitllllilil'Ilillllllllliilllllillllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllillllilllilll~~,IJ s ~_ ~_ ,~.~ ~ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~=-~ ~-- ,~ _ -- APPE CE REQUEST -- - :_ _ PUBLIC HEARING ~/ ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS __ SUBJECT: o I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND' ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: a- -_ e Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment c whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. - _ - ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ,_. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between. a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. _. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. i ~ ^ Speakers are requested to leave .any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ~_ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BF,HALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. _ -_ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK -. -- - - ~Illillllllllllillllllllilllllillllllllllll l III111111111111111111111IiiiiII11111111111111Illllilllilliil[Illlllllllllllllllilllllm U~~,~,111l~I11l111l1~11lt111111111~i11111111~I1~i1~1~Iri!ll~llll~Sl1~11~11111~iirrrrrrrrrrrrrrrirrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrirrlillllllll~ _ _ - - _ - r ~ ~ ~ ~ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~_ APPE CE REQUEST _ _ `~ / PUBLiC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS .~ s SUBJECT: ~~S~n .~ ~ ~ ~ {' ~~ c I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. ~_ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GNE MY NAME AND ADDRESS v FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY~~ THE GUIDELINES LISTED =_ ,r BELOW: ® Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment e whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of~the Board to do otherwise. _ !.. r o ® Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. s e~ s ® All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. c -_ ® Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ® Speakers are requested to Ieave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. v m .= ® INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP c SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. c m- c PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK i .~ f~ ~~ e~ ~ ~~ Y~I. ~~ •~ s ~ i ~. 1~ ~~ ~ l~ ~~ ~~ _ ~~ ~~ m111111111111111tt1111lllilllllllllllllfillilillillliillllillllilllilllllllllillllllillillllllllllllllllllllilllllllllili1111111i~ Illllllllilllllllllllllll111111111l11111111111111111111111111iIIIIIi1111111111111111111111111111iIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1111111111~jJ,~ ~. - s - - - AGENDA ITEM NO. ~____ ... - ,r - - ,_ - ~. - - APPE CE REQUEST .__ __ I= PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS ~ o ~~ - - ~,~ ~ ~ _ SUBJECT: ~ ~C ~, ~1 ~ ~~~~ c~~~ r~ ~ - -, _ e ~ ~ ~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND' ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED ,~ BELOW: ,- - ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will - decide the time Limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. - s ~ s - ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. s - _. s ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. =_ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ,- - ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments o vc~th the clerk. _ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BF,HALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP = SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - _ - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK c - - - ... - - s ~ s ~ ~ ~~ - ~ ~_ ~1111lllllllllltlllllllllllllllllliillllllllllllllillllllllllllllillllfilllllllllllllilllllilllllllliliflllllllllilllllllifllllllm Uttttttttttitttttittttitttttttttttitttttttttittittitt1t11111tIJ11111111111111illiililiillllllllllllli1111111111111lIIIIIIiIiIIIIIJIJ _ _ _ _ _ _ c - AGENDA ITEM NO. ~j r r APPEARANCE REQUEST _ _ r' e .. ~ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS c s ~ ^~ ,~ . o SUBJECT: ~ 5 ~~ ~, ~~' - ".' ._. _ c I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the ° meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS ,- ,,. o FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY~~ THE GUIDELINES LISTED °_ BELOW: ° c ® Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment e whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, c and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to e do otherwise. - ~ - o ® Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only, c Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ® All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized e s speaker and audience members is not allowed. .~. ® Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ ,, = ® Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. v ® INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. c .~ .~ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK .; _. ~. . ._ ... _ _ c mIIlIII11111111Ililllllllllllllllll11111I Illlllllillilllitilll111111111111111111t11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111i11i'~1 ~I llllilll 11111 1111111 111 1111 lllllilllllllll lllllllil{Ill l lllil l 11111 lilt ll l l 11111 ll llllilllllllllllllllllllllll llilllillll111111jj) ^. _ ,. _ s ~ ~ ~ .. ~ .~ ~ AGENDA ITEM NO. ,._ - _. APPE CE REQUEST ._ ~- - ~_ _ '~ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS _. __ SUBJECT: ~ .~!/ ~ ~G~ ~/ r ~ o ~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the .'= meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND' ADDRESS c FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ®_ -_ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment = whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will _ -' decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. - ` - s ~ _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave .any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. c ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BF,HALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP - SHALL FILE WITH -THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. -_ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK i ~ ~~ ~~ it ~~ ~~ ~ Y~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ s ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ - ~~ ~ ~ ~_ ~1111111111IIilllllllllllllllliillllllllll I I Illttlllllllll1111111111111111111111111111111111111illlllllltlll111111111111111111111m Ililliillillllllllililllllllilllllllllllllllllllllliiillllillllilllllllllllillilllllllllllllillllllllilllllllllllllllillilllllll~,~ ,. - s ~ ° - _~ ~ .~ - AGENDA ITEM NO. S~ ._ - ° - - ,- _ ~. - ~. _ ~~ a ~~ ~ APPE CE REQUEST ~ -_ ?.~~~ ~ ~~ ~ °_ ~_ I= ~ /PUBLIC HEARING / bRDINANCE "~ CITIZENS COMMENTS ° ... - ~ _ __ - SUBJECT: ~_~ ~ ~ (~;,c~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ r /~ ~ ~. ~ ~'i rri ~ ~s = I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND' ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED -. - BELOW: = s ~' ~.~ - ~~ - ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will - decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. - = - ° -_ - ~ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. ,_ Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. s - ~. -. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. -_ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ,..- - ^ Speakers are requested to leave .any written statements and/or comments ° vc~th the clerk. '" ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - ° ° -_ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK ° - ,-- - ° ~ - ° - .... - i ~ ~~ ~ i - ~~ ~~ - d ~llllllllllllillllllilillllllllllllllllifllillllllllllllllltlllll11111111111111111111111111111111111111flllllllfllllllllllflillllm ~lilllllllllllllillllilllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllliiliillillllllllllllllllllllillllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll~jJ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. APPEARANCE REQUEST ~_ _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS -_ ~_ SUBJECT: ~ ~~`~ ~~~ ~.. ~ '~ ~ -f- ~ ~'; J, , ~•~. _ ~ 4.k ; ~. .-~: `. f I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the ,, = meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND' ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ~- ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment = whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments o with the clerk. c .... _ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BF,HALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP = SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. r. -_ .PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK ~-- a ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ v~ s ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ s i ~~ ~~ ~1 ~ _ ~ ~~ ~~ a~ ~ ~ilill11111[11111111Iillllllllllllllllllll 11 Illlliilllllllllllllllllllflllllllllllllillllillfllll111111ft1lflllilllilllllllllllllm ~Ilillllilillllllllllllllllllllllllllililllllllllllii~llllllllllllllilllillllllilllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllltlllllllll~,() AGENDA ITEM NO. `~~ APPE CE REQUEST -_ - :- _ I^ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS __ __ SUBJECT: ~:, C~r<~,,~,,~,n~-y ;; _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND' ADDRESS _: FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED ... ,_ "" BELOW: ,- _ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. - _ - •s ~ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. ,_ Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. _. _ _ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ,, _ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments o with the clerk. c s ~~ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BF,HALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. c _. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK s ~ ~~ ~~ a ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ o v.~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~. ~~ ~~ ~~ i ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ !~ i ~~ ~~ f~ ~ ~ NAME - ~ , ~ - ~.. _ - ~ ~ ~_ __ ADDRESS ~~I '/ _ c PHONE ~ ~1"~_ __ ~ r~ `1 - ~ ~ ci' ~> ~ttttltitttttlltltlllitttltiltilllilltll1111111ttiltlllllillliltfttllllillllllllttlllllttllllllilllllililtillltiltlllllllilllltllm ~Ilillliilllllllllllllllliilllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllrillillllllllllllllllllllillllllill1111111111111111111111111111111111111,1) _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ ~ ,._ ,_ ,_ APPEARANCE REQUEST ~_ _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS __ - SUBJECT: ~~ .~ _ 'Y-~"`,~- a I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND' ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ~-- -_ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will _ decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. - _ - a ~ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. -. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. __ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ~-- ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = vc~th the clerk. __ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BF,HALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. c PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK --- ~111111111111111111111111111l111111111111111I1I1111111111111111111111iI11111iIIliI1111111111111i111111111111tI11111111111ifllilllm S -~ A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 1997 ORDINANCE 092397-10 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 0.33-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 3534 BRAMBLETON AVENUE (TAX MAP N0. 77.10-6-9) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGIS- TERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICA- TION OF C-1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2 IN ORDER TO OPERATE A PET BUSINESS, UPON THE APPLICATION OF ALEX M. NELSON AND BETTY L. NELSON WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on August 19, 1997, and the second reading and public hearing were held September 23, 1997; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on September 2, 1997; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 0.33 acre, as described herein, and located at 3534 Brambleton Avenue (Tax Map Number 77.10-6-9) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of C-1, Office District, to the zoning classifica- tion of C-2, General Commercial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Alex M. Nelson and Betty L. Nelson. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEING the major part of Lot 10, Block 2, Mount Vernon Heights, as shown on survey for Alex M. Nelson and Betty L. Nelson, made by T.P. Parker & Son, LS, dated April 21, 1997, and further described as Tax Map No. 77.10-6-9. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: ~~f. ~. Mary H. llen, CMC Clerk to the Board cc: File Arnold Covey, Engineering and Inspection Terry Harrington, Planning and Zoning John Birckhead, Real Estate Assessments Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney S3 PETITIONER: ALEX ~ BETTY NELSON CASE NUMBER: 28-9/97 Planning Commission Hearing Date: September 2, 1997 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: September 23, 1997 A. REQUEST Petition of Alex & Betty Nelson to rezone approximately 0.33 acres from C-1 to C-2 in order to operate a pet business, located at 3534 Brambleton Avenue, Cave Spring Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION In response to questions from the Commission, Mr. Nelson commented as follows: the building facade needs renovation and he will try to save the trees in front; signage will probably be attached to the building; hope to share access to the site with the veterinary clinic next door; parking for customers will be behind the building. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS None. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Witt moved to recommend approval of the petition. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Robinson, Thomason, Hooker, Witt, Ross NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report ~ Other ;!~ ,_ _. Terrance Harring , Secr ry Roanoke Cou Planning Commission .. ~ S- ~ • STAFF REPORT Case Number: 28-9/97 Prepared by: Janet Scheid Applicant: Alex & Betty Lou Nelson Date: September 2, 1997 PART I A EXECUTIVE 'StTNlMPRY Petitloner;ns~request is marginallycornpatible with the Transition land use designation.- ~ The proposed use is 'a :low impact:retail use ..- which should provide °;little" to ~no. disruption ~~to ~:the~r"neighboring __ _ e . _ _.._._,._ _~..:_ __ _ ~. ,~ ._..._ . .~ .~r ~... ~.. _ .... s . _ _ ._ ,, . ~ . a _ singlE,'~tamily residences-.' B. DESCRIPTION This is a request to rezone an existing single family house from C- 1 to C-2 to operate a retail pet shop selling pet supplies and animals and grooming and boarding birds. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS 1. Site plan review will be required. The Department of Engineering has commented that this site plan will need to delineate the following three items: A. VDOT approval of the entrance widening. B. Stormwater management to accommodate the additional parking required. Four to five parking spaces will be required. C. Sanitary sewer sampling manhole. 2. Commercial entrance permit will be required. PART II • A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS 1. Lot Area - This is a 75' x 190.5' foot lot. The topography of the lot is relatively flat. 2. Location - This lot has direct frontage and access onto 1 Brambleton Avenue. The lots to the east and west are zoned C-1 and C-2 and across Brambleton Avenue the lots are zoned C-2. Directly behind this site, to the south, are single family residential houses. 3. Buildings/Structures - A 2-story brick and frame house with a detached garage exists on this site. 4. Access - Access is from Brambleton Avenue. B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 1. Use - Petitioner proposes to use the existing house for a retail pet store. The store would sell pets and pet supplies and also provide grooming and boarding of birds. All activities will occur inside the structure. No outside uses are proposed including kennels, runs or outside cages. 2. Access to Site - Access will continue to be from Brambleton Avenue although VDOT may require that the access be widened. 3. Circulation - A concept plan has not been submitted with this application. Petitioner has indicated an interest in sharing a driveway with the veterinary clinic directly to the east. 4. Traffic Count - Average daily traffic on this section of Brambleton Avenue is approximately 20,000 vehicles per day. The proposed use would have a very insignificant impact on this traffic count. 5. Public Services - Public water and sewer is available to this site. The Engineering Department has indicated that a sanitary sewer manhole will be required in addition to G stormwater management facility. 6. Signage - Petitioner has been informed that a freestanding sign will not be permitted on this site because it has less .than 100' of frontage. • 2 S-3 ' CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PART III STAFF CONCLUSIONS This site is located in an area designated Transition in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. Retail uses are encouraged in Transition to a limited degree when clustered or when within a planned shopping center. The petitioner's proposed use is a low impact retail use, generating a low volume of traffic, noise, turning movements, lighting, etc. The site is small and will be challenging for the petitioner to redevelop in compliance with Roanoke County development standards including parking and stormwater management. Staff recommends approval of this petition. PREPARED BY: JANET SCHEID DATE PREPARED: August 27, 1997 • 3 :7 • COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 5204 Bernard Or.~ . P.0. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 ~ 540' 772-2068 F:aX (540) 772-2108 ~.~: ~i~,a~~ .5,3 For staff use only date received, received b'/: . 1 I applic~,tiap (ee: ~ ~' 1`~:~ PC/EZ~.a dz:~ + placards issued: i30S da:e• NO Case Number: /~, 1~{ •- -- Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, ~•~::::~, and frontage requirements of the requested cis:-::? YES ~ NO IF N0, A V.-.=I~.NCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria fcr ;:-,~ requested Use Type? YES ''~ NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being pro:f~~e~ with this request? YES NO ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ............................ Variance of Section(s) of t~~e Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance ir. cr~e~ :o: Is the application complete? Please check if enc:csed. APPLICATION WELL NOT 6E ACCEPTED li= ~.\Y OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v ws v ws v ~! Consultation ~ 8 1 /2" x i i ' concept plan Application fee !~ Application ~ ~~ Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable ,,, + Justification %~ Water and sewer application ~ Adjoining property owners l hereby certify that l am either the owner o/ the property or the oN~ner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the know/edge and consent of the owner. 7 Owner's Signature: E'''.•'.•f ••`•.iiiiiii`iiiiiiii:•`:iiiiiiii~iiii~iiii'iiiiiiii`iii'iiiiii`iiii ~ I . iF :~ Proposed Zoning: C2 ~~ scarf use c-:: Proposed Land Use: Pet Business use Type: 5--~ w• _ i ~- ~ 1 ~ `, _ ~ - W ~ - j 'ti. ~ J _ ~; f'. (: ~i~J July 31, 1997~.,~.,_-.~.~..._ ~.;.:,``~ . Mrs. Janet Scheid County of Roanoke P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 Dear Mrs. Sheid; Thank you for your letter requesting information on the business we plan to operate at 3534 Brambleton Avenue. This will be a retail pet shop offering pets and pet supplies. We also do some bird grooming and boarding of birds. Our anticipated hours will be 10 A.M. to 7 P.M. Monday through Friday and 10 A.M. to 3 P.M. on Saturday. Will be in for several hours on Sunday to feed animals and clean. Hours may be extended during holiday seasons. Classy Critters ?et Center has been in business in the county since 1985. We would appreciate any help you can give us in upgrading this propdrty from C-1 to C-2 so that we may stay in business. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, ~1~ ~~ l~~ Alex & Betty Lou Nelson • • C~!NTY OE RC~ti(E, V I R6I N I A ~kATER / Sc~R SERVICE CO1dTRACT ,~°' June c3, 1997 Nave; NELSCN III ALEX M /NEEL50N fiETTY L CLASSY CRITTERS FET CENTER INC Mailing Address; 4614 CORt1ELL DR Account No.: 202c658+D Lacatior, No.: &39161 Sac. Sec. #: PRIM; 54i-56-974 SEG. Pho^e: {~]RK) 540-989-~~'•3 {t?G,"iE) 54Z-; ~~-5279 City/State/Zip; RL~~',`OKE VA 24213 Service Address: 3534 9RF?{3LETCN AVE Deposit Aeoun:: t 120.28 Start Date; 2513/47 LAB Soak #: S~ 4 • hater Serial #: 208R9354c6 LEeAL DESCRIPTIi;rl OF °ERVICE ADDRESS: "eke/Sine: fiAD6ER :,/3 Service iype: kATER/Sci;~ER .,lbdiv.: ~ T ,_~{; iei~iTa iax ~ p 7 ', o- ': ! t - 9ik - sect. 12 - -? a~ '~ ~~- y _ Ma #: 7 ,1 The and?rsigr,ed herehy applies :o Roanoke Ccuaty and its successors and assigns ;o receive :ertai:, goVerP.ientdl serVlceS ds indicated below tC ane eCOVe d2acribed rr?915e5 oni/, 5itudt2d In t~~e GCUnty )~ Roanoke, Virginia, used for residential/coi~6rcial ~~rposes. T`e Ulde:"Sly'i~2d apaiican 3yree5 ~~ be iie~? for dll C;1dr;e5 fOr G1i?5e yaVarne?nt31, Sei"~iC:a cn id:~ rr°915es Until notic?, in ~rftiay, 15 ~1V@n :0 .~~i~tf Of Roanoke t3 a?rAindte *h15 agr?eaent and S~i~~i d;G~~;i shall ^2 racov?Yabl? Oy dll r?~e0:?S Yt'oVlu2~ Cd?Ii no123;2dd and ail 0:der 2~(e~i~::~]n5 of ~?? drGl:::i~: 1?rEbV C~Vc~~~dn.i and agrees ;J ~:ay aLi SL'Ch C:^~"?i ~'lrinc :~2 tirA 0:' billi 3;r?272n, a5 ~`~e;J beC:Je .l'c ~'._ pafdri? dny ~~ abi:71 may, C0~1p'ly iVl~~ dnd ]~i;rV? a.. rUi2:~ „eg::laii~7l~) 3`cd ra`sai lv?I in '~~~? 01` ~are3j;_r ~?C31.? eStablli^e~.i b~ R+7nlCR? ~~2iin:1 Tyr :lei: _ _. i32nn3: 3?rV1C?5 tv :ire 7"'?'a:i?~. t~Qdn.~d: GvUii:f r9Sei"re5 the ?`l y` ;0 ,?ra:"s:e .~:5 cLreEi?n: 1~On ii;: ~;,23i ~a'f: i~v:iC? i7r ~::'~5? - '~ :4e ViCie:l~ii vi any rule )r 1'eyUia :uny 6r u~Sii .~~. fall!1~_ t0 pay :i~2 1`i:?i 4r _~ary95 i,~C~d '.~r .._ services. 7h? Gaunty shall in n8 ?vJnt be re5Cn5i]12 fr ldintaining dny 'serV1C? iil2 a~ned bV t'2 applicdn:, i~7" far daeages done by eater or se~+age iscapii~g t„erefroa; nor froa d2f2cts in ii..?s or fixtures oa the croperty of tie applicant. All charges are effective froe 'the date of actual connectian pith Roanoke Cdunty's :+aterise~er s,s:2e and continuously thereafter until~tereinated as provided in paragraati t:uo {21 or thret {3). ~ / ~~~ _____ _ _ ~ieas? sign contract and raiain yeilcw copy for your records. _ _ - • -- i ,~.EAIERAL NOTES: 1. TH~5 PLAT WAS PREPARED _WITHOUT BENEFIT OF A TI1LE REPORT AND IS SUBJECT THERETO. THi`REFORE, THERE {SAY EXIST ENCUMBRANCES WHICH AFFECT THE PROPERTY NOT SHOWN HEREON. 2. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS WITHIN THE U>aiTS OF ZONE .X, A5 5HOWN ON THE FE3~A FLOOD INSURANCE RATE UAP. THIS DETER{~INATION IS BASED ON SA10 laAP AND NAS NOT BEEN VERIFlED BY ~ ti~ o `~ 0~~2 QV. ry. !~, ~h O' ~.,. ~ ACTUAL FIELD ELEVATIONS. .,. ' LEGEN ~ FR ~ FRAF~E BR a 9RICK CONC ~ CONCRETE U.S. 221 OHW OVERHEAD WIRES P ~ ~ORCH BRAti18LETON AVENUE, S.W. Sew ~ SIDEWALK 80` W10E~A~ N 58'00'00" E SET uETER 75.00 POLE c 300' TO CURT15 AVE., S.W. IRON PIN FOUND cs•1,-ar uNK FF?tC£ z.o~--- IRON Pot • FOlR1D AT lOe.td 0.19 WEST Z PROPERTY OF t~.)~ DAVID L k BONNIE o TOPPING ~ TAX f 77.10-06-10 p D.B. 1493, PG. 138 i % + ~1 75.00` IRON P!N u ~ I I IRON PIN FOUND °: I BEARS 19.3' ~ I N 79'31'35` E I 0.26' STORY I 8R be FR ~ I ~-~ X353 I I , •.- I I t ur x i>: ~ PROPERTY OF _ as raRw to I ap i ~11~ od~osr f~ 1st o u L~o~r io T ~ I~.~K Z 0 i ~ . LIND F. k W1LUAl~ A. I PAYED JENNINGS I ~~ TAX ~ 77.10-06-08 ~ _ _ D.B 1523, PG. 890 W cD tJ 0 ~„ °o_ uNx FENC£ p ~0.2'EA51 p oF' uNE a M uNK FENCE RQCX eEARs N 7a'S3' w o.~o' IRCN ROD BEARS 5 53'14' W PROPERTY OF o.4~' ANNA L. -AITCHELL TAX ~ 77.10-08-18 D.B. 234, PG. 127 • GRAPir 'ARBOR' 0.5' EAST .~. OF U»E 75.00` ~5.00'~ S 58'00'00" W N sa'oo'oo' E ~RON BOLT IRON PI FOUND FOUND PROPERTY OF ANNA L. UITCHELL TAX ~ 77.10-06-19 D.B. 681, PG. 117 FOUND PROPERTY OF GERALg W. SINK TAX ~ 7'.10-C6-20 W.B. 43,E PG. 1395 SUgVEY FrJR ALES Illl. NELSON ~ BETTY L. NELSON OF THE ~1AJOR PART OF LOT 10, BLOCK 2 MOUNT VERNON HEIGHTS, SURVEY N0. 1 P.B. 2, PG. 67 CAVE SPRING taAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA . TAX ~ .10-08-09 D 15 TPP8~5 T' p' p'~ ~ 50N N.8 JR-183 DRAWN ate Bealr.ard CALC. CHK'D `~ suaKYOne Pe.t oeae. Bea ~4 r~O_ D' LRD _ _ _ PI.I.NNERa Sd~m. ~~ 1!4161 ~C /!- IA R Y Na lets -.-~v,~9y~3 SCALE: 1'~ 40' DATE: A~RILLI ,1997 D- 4V`13 4• wn• ~'T-o~'~I i• TUR R0. <' I ~ R.~ > 4-, •r ~ ~ c ~ Q. ,,.tve'S E,GT ' :; [: tIry e ^. ~ ~" C ~ ' ~ ? ' y1 'O _ _ ~R .'^'r. ~1' F f~ '"~ NE O J. 4 I IL S 1 CE •~ ~.p C,a~e J'orir D ~- S:3 HORiH la r Im ~~• YII I 1JK , It ~ JJOf / ~ Js// FA'1 ~-. J~v/ ~ 26 ~ 3 ~. zo S J.,~ ' Je.1 s I =„~ 2 ? s>vr z I ' Jr.• 2? ~--~ - - - - .-~ - = ~ ~ ~ d ~ 2 I ~ ` D ~ _. _ TtA ~~ 23 • 7 ~ ly ~ 7 ZI ~ -- r. srsr " ' Ji.v ?r•u ' ~ ~ I ! ° w Jra I s'' 24 I I , ~ -- -- I ~' JcN >, C 11 : a „ , i 16 ~ 29 arJS 7 ~ Jr!! ~ ~ R ~ 23 ~ •JtY ~ I + XJ/ ~ ...2 IWAe JJJS ~, i >e 17 4 = t9 ~ a 9 ' II , Jtn ~ R'q • , R ~ I J ' J 6 sat = ti IOC r ,ty I ` .~ Jsr>• ~ .n ~. I H ~ ,` R(~ • 4 10 ~ ~ ! JsY/ I 8 ~ 'u J t I ~H.1 I LOO.Ic O a / R M 2 ~o _ Jr., --. _ ~. _ '+ rcv - ~ A ~/ •~ A w IS = I I ~ IS r O JTJO ~ ~.~\ "a. +\+ J~ Jas JQS , 21 J t9 ~ \ ~ JLJ/ 14 ~ Jn•2O ~~ '~~ Pfn•wl• -~_ ~~ L q„ JsII Jacs _ 2 / ~ uu n o• .a a ~~ Rood -~- ~~ n • ni. n n 1 ~~ • ! 1T0 Jit I ~'•a.. 1'~~ xu (/~ i V ` ~ t2 II = JJCV O ~ J~v I Jsx ~il~o/ L V asps rf ~ I/ 4 C 26 Z7 .! ~ ~ ~ 37 32 ~ J!N ~ L ~~ J+a~\~,+ J Z3 2 ,~ la,, ~ ~ t I Loo ., ~, ' ti- Ja o F +o 4 ~ G •, x RI. I ~ ~' ~ \\ V m _ ~ ' 6 9 ~ q -1. ~ 3 i J I /r Jr • •' ° a +. _ J7 1' 1>~_. „ f ,'1 ~ ,.~ J..r, 4 .,~ ~~ - C . ~~ ~, M ~ n s 3. ~y I e I - I ~C~~ ' to s" ~ \ ~~~ -,•,d. ~•~ r LO„~, ? +\ ~ .,' v~~ ` ., `~~ Jar-. t'' ~ ~ r ,, b- L ~ .. r9 49 i ~ ~ Js11 ~ \y 1\I t7 ' \ I~ ~ e j ` \'• I• - o w Off. _ ~ .• ~ ~~ ' Iron/ i. 1sN `..1 " •S\ J ~ ^ . ALEX & BETTY L• NELSON DEPARTME,~IT OF PLA.NNZh'G O-1 TO C-2 AND 7ANING .. ~ 77. SO-6-9 S~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 1997 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 0.33-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 3534 BRAMBLETON AVENUE (TAX MAP NO. 77.10-6-9) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICA- TION OF C-2 IN ORDER TO OPERATE A PET BUSINESS, UPON THE APPLICATION OF ALEX M. NELSON AND BETTY L. NELSON WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on August 19, 1997, and the second reading and public hearing were held September 23, 1997; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on September 2, 1997; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 0.33 acre, as described herein, and located at 3534 Brambleton Avenue (Tax Map Number 77.10-6-9) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of C-1, Office District, to the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Alex M. Nelson and Betty L. Nelson. C:\OFFICE\WPWIN\WPDOCS\AGENDA\ZONING\NELSON.RZN 1 . ~ "~ ,~ 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEING the major part of Lot 10, Block 2, Mount Vernon Heights, as shown on survey for Alex M. Nelson and Betty L. Nelson, made by T.P. Parker & Son, LS, dated April 21, 1997, and further described as Tax Map No. 77.10-6-9. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. C:\OFFICE\WPWIN\WPDOCS\AGENDA\ZONING\NELSON.RZN 2 ,,,,r,,, ° a? ~"'` AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 1997 ORDINANCE Q~2397-11 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 1.01-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED BEHIND CARILION FAMILY MEDICINE ON BRAMBLETON AVENUE (TAX MAP NO. 77.09-4- 52.1) IN THE WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C- 2C TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2 UPON THE APPLICATION OF CARILION HEALTH CORP., INC. WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on August 19, 1997, and the second reading and public hearing were held September 23, 1997; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on September 2, 1997; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 1.01 acres, as described herein, and located behind Carilion Family Medicine on Brambleton Avenue (Tax Map Number 77.09-4-52.1) in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of C-2C, General Commercial District, Conditional, to the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Carilion Health Corp., Inc. 3. That in 1984 rezoning of this property the owner of the property voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions 1 which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, accepted and the Petitioner/Owner is now requesting be removed: 4. That the owner of the property voluntarily proffers in writing the following condition which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts: 5. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at an iron pin located at the southeast corner of the property of Thomas R. Watkins and Linda W. Watkins as shown on survey made by T. P. Parker & Son, E&S, dated May 15, 1979, a copy of which survey is of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 1132, page 453; thence along the eastern line of the property of Watkins, N. 32Q 00' W. 150.0 feet to a point located on the line of the 14.68 acre tract conveyed to Southern Land Company; thence with same, N. 58Q 00' E. 330.0 feet to a point; thence along a new line through the property of Southern Land Company, S. 32 Q 00' E. 110.0 feet to a point located at the northeast corner of the property of Charles R. 2 Simpson and Naomi G. Simpson as shown on plat made by T. P. Parker & Son, E&S, dated June 18, 1980, of record in the Clerk's Office aforesaid in Deed Book 1147, page 748; thence with the property of Simpson, S. 584 00' W. 130.0 feet to a point; thence S. 324 00' E. 40.0 feet to a point located on the line of the property described as Moore's Building Supply; thence with same, S. 584 00' W. 200.0 feet to the Place of Beginning, and containing 1.01 acres, and being further described as Tax Map No. 77.09-4-52.1. 6. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance with condition #1 removed, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: /~' Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board cc: File Arnold Covey, Engineering and Inspection Terry Harrington, Planning and Zoning John Birckhead, Real Estate Assessments Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 3 S-~ PETITIONER: CARILION HEALTH CORP. INC. CASE NUMBER: 29-9/97 Planning Commission Hearing Date: September 2, 1997 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: September 23, 1997 A. REQUEST Petition of Carilion Health Corp. Inc. to rezone 1.01 acres from C-2C to C-2 in order to construct a parking lot, located behind Carilion Family Medicine on Brambleton Avenue, Windsor Hills Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Commission asked about the previous proffers. Ms. Scheid responded that the conditions addressed soil and slope stabilization, proffered concept plan, and that the property be used only for amini-warehouse project. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS 1) Petitioner does not intend to use the 25 foot easement from Garst Mill Road as access to the parking area and will take appropriate, legal measures to discourage the use of this easement to access the proposed parking lot. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Thomason moved to recommend approval of the petition with proffered condition. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Robinson, Thomason, Hooker, Witt, Ross NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report Other Terrance Har ~ gton, S etary Roanoke ounty Pla Wing Commission ~~ • STAFF REPORT PARTI PETITION: Carilion Health Corp. Inc PREPARED BY: T. Harrington A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FILE NO.: 29-9/97 DATE: August 27, 1997 This is a request to remove conditions on a 1984 rezoning to allow a 1.01 acre parcel of land to be used for a parking lot associated with Brambleton Family Physicians. The property is designated Core in the comprehensive plan. Access to the site will be directly from the adjacent parking lot serving the physicians office. B. DESCRIPTION This is a request of Carilion Health Corp. to rezone a 1.01 acre parcel from C-2C to C-2. The purpose of the request is to remove conditions from a 1984 rezoning so that this parcel, and an adjoining vacant C-2 parcel can be used as part of an expanded parking area for Brambleton Family Physicians. The property is located in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. It lies behind commercial parcels on Brambleton Ave. currently used by Brambleton Deli, and the physicians office. Six proffers were accepted as part of the 1984 rezoning. These proffers addressed soil and slope stabilization, and required that the property be used only for amini-warehouse project. To be used as a parking lot, these conditions must be removed. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Parking facilities (lots), either associated with a principal use, or as a main use are permitted by right in C-2 districts. Site Plan approval will be required prior to the construction of the parking lot. Plan approval will include the approval of a stormwater management plan for the property. S-'~ PART II A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS The property is a rectangular parcel that lies between the Brambleton Avenue businesses and the Oakcliff Townhomes that are located considerably above the site. Most of the property is flat, with the exception of the northern side that slopes steeply up to Oakcliff. Portions of the site behind the physicians office have a gravel base and apparently are occasionally used for overflow parking by area businesses. The eastern portion of the site is undeveloped. Access and Circulation Current access to the site is limited to two separate access easements. One of these easements is 25 feet wide, originates on Garst Mill Road, and "snakes " behind Rally's, Long John Silver's , Hardees etc. to provide access from the western end of this property. The second easement is 45 feet wide and provides access to this property from Brambleton Avenue. This easement is located between Brambleton Hardware and Brambleton Deli. Access to the new parking area will be provided from a new connection to the existing Brambleton Family Physicians property. The attached site plan entitled "Option 2" , is the most recent proposal for the development of this site. This plan shows that the existing garage/storage at the physicians office will be removed and the existing parking area will be reconfigured to extend into this site and the adjacent parcel behind Brambleton Hardware that is zoned C-2. Surrounding Neighborhood The surrounding neighborhood is comprised of the C-2 commercial businesses on Brambleton, and the Oakcliff Townhomes located north of (and above) the site. If the proposed parking lot is eventually extended to the eastern end of the lot now zoned C-2, it will be adjacent to the assisted care facility recently approved by Roanoke County. B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Layout Carillon proposes a modification to their existing site on. Brambleton so that all of the areas devoted to buildings and parking can be tied together in a unified site plan. Modifications. include removal of the existing garage/storage area, relocation of the Brambleton Avenue entrance, and the construction of two 2 File No.: s-y additions. These modifications will allow vehicles to directly enter the new parking area without using either of the access easements Traffic Generation Carillon anticipates future growth in the services and activities at this facility. Associated increases in traffic can be anticipated with this growth. Based upon the size of the expanded building, the proposal provides 36 more parking spaces than are required by the county. Amenities All new parking areas will be landscaped in accord with the zoning ordinance. In addition, a minimum 15 foot wide buffer will be required between the parking area and the Oakcliff property line. A retaining wall is proposed along this property line, outside of this buffer area. The buffer area will need to contain plantings in accord with the ordinance. The Department of Engineering has commented that proper stormwater management will be critical on this property. Current conceptual plans do not show any defined detention areas, however, detention of stormwater will be required as part of site plan review. C. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The property is designated Core in the comprehensive plan. Parking associated with commercial uses in this area is an appropriate use and is consistent with general plan provisions. PART III STAFF CONCLUSIONS Staff believes that a parking area is an appropriate use of this property given its location and existing limited access options. 3 File No.: • COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 5204 Bernard ter. P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (540` 772-2068 FAX (540) 772-2108 ~~2, 7/ar/Yj ~ rti~p 7/~t~4~ C~i~"" ` For staff use only «~~~ date rec ived:- received by: application ( e: ~, PC/BZA date ~ . / ' ~ i s~ ~ plac~r ~ BOS date: C± ;z 3 ~ / ~ / Case Number: ~ r r Check type of application filed (check all that apply): ® REZONING ^ SPECIAL USE ^ VARIANCE Applicant's name: John C. Christodoulides Phone:981-8834 Address: 127 McClanahan St., SW, Roanoke, VA Zip Code: 24014 Owner's name: Carilion Health Corporation, Znc. Phone: 981-4041 Address: P. 0. Box 13727, Roanoke, VA Zip Code: 24036 Location of property: Tax Map Number: 77.09-4-52 .l Off Northwest Margin of Brambleton Magisterial District: ~ ,~~~ --I;~-s Ave., County of Roanoke Community Planning Area: ~Av6 sPR/N~ Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: C-2 Conditional • 1.01 acres Existing Land Use: Unused, occasionally overflow parking for local 43,900 sq.ft. businesses Proposed Zoning: C-2 General Proposed Land Use: Parking Lot For Sratf Use On/y Use Type: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES X NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES X NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being prorfered with this request? YES NO Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws nrs ws v Consultation 8 1 /2" x 1 1 " concept plan Application fee ~ Application ».`u Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable Justification ~~~s Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners / hereby certify that l am either the owner o/ the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner. Owner's Signature: s-Y C7 JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONING The Carilion Brambleton Center is a major heathcare facility in Roanoke County offering a wide range of patient services including surgery. Growth experienced over the past few years and projections for the future necessitate plans for expansion. Rezoning of the subject property, tax map number 77.09-4-52, is critical for a growth process furthering the purposes of the Roanoke County Zoning ordinance. It is proposed to convert a largely unused lot into a modern parking facility to support the Brambleton Center. Most of the proposed parking spaces will provide greatly needed parking for staff members and patients relieving congestion in a facility with limited parking. Adjoining businesses will benefit from the proposed parking during their peak hours when traffic at the medical center is minimal. The proposed parking iot design will comply with Roanoke County rules and guidelines for adjoining properties and will enhance and beautify the area. Carilion aims at improving the well being of the communities it serves. The planned expansion of the Brambleton Center will improve considerably health care services in Roanoke County. A well planned expansion, compatible with the needs of the community must include adequate additional parking which will be made possible by the requested rezoning. •s ~47 f~ 4 w a ~~ v~~' ~~~~ ~~~~ n ~~3 WQ~ FZ- a • ~ • EXHIBIT "B" D-11140 D-11,b4 i w BR.4~.ABLETOU ~ ~ NAR~W4RE D-181154 e~roo•off~-..- as2.zar~_ 3.s Uaiooroo-w -u~.qz-- _ ~ r ~ ~: ~ Y ~ CudRL.ES R. & 1J.a01.A 1 G. i x Zg ~ ~ ~ s~-~PSOU ~ O A $ ';; ,p /~ ~ CT-t5[)uc CI.uRU~ aESTS~-asuT) - 1 ~ D-18 07 b32`o0'00'E + ~ ,. h ;; .~ ~t. d 8 ~~ F~"~ 0.3~..~~ c-tla~3 ~ g MC~ORE'S 3 BU 1 L011JG 8 gUPPLY D-1~q~ n S'.52.OafOOrE+ -~ >J32-varoorw 4 J 41i. ~3A0' G ,' U 13.OOOOrE~ ~ 14.14• ~~ . O.'31S a.CRZ 1 O-22aT1 s 3z-oa oo•>? - Zs.oor 0.124 dCRE G-21Z99_~y a tq4 ~ca¢ \ D- 210.4p O o~ 92 ~~F~ ~~ Pti001'Eal'Y OF W ~ _ SO~1 E - UOELL •. 3 EUTERPR 1 SES, 1UC. d ~w~siDe¢•s) ~ O.H.1p'Sp PC~.~4'1 ~ •' n P '~ - ~~ i .l- ~y Y ~ 7 ~~ ~-.~ ~ c8`rQ~ ~ ,U~o. 2 ~ ~32'ZI- .. 30.4• W ~LtOPS'cRTY aR ~ ou U w. ~ so~u~.e, S. 1r4a'T i CN4 o,B.l09o ~.,~ (LO'-JG JO~IW SiLYER O.~.t. eCRFS o- w3e3 r.a~y ~/r,~ LI4~ o•10.vCAE SD•ZZ8D2 l~ ~$ ~N o~ 2 3 VIClw11TY N ~..~sa W W QN ~N ~. W W N a~ -; qp ~t~~ ~~ PLAT 1.~pD6 FOR SOUTNERU LAUD C01J1 P~•UY b1iOWIUG gOI.O E4bE1~AEW7>'~RO~ RELACATEO VI-. Sly. R'TE. G82 CGd-QST -J111.L GLOSD) TO u.s. R'T~. 221 C egs.~,rte>rsTOU ev>~Ue, bwa 1 NtAf•l~ CfRTIII THAT TMIf n ' ~~~ CA~lItCT. Q0~IJOKH COUIJTY YIMOINIA •r T. P. PARKER d 50N funlucc~t 1 SLJ~VfVOlS Corr>rlcxn M0. ~ , gars ~~ 1 i 1 •CAl[• 1' - 10D• 1 OAT[ -1~11LZ~l~fp V ~ Z • ~ - r i ~ I z W N~ Z ~. I Z ~ I ~~ N V _~~ Q z ~`~' uv H w I X~ ~ W o 0o Q~ ~ d~ ~ ~ W ~ o w O ~N, I I ~ ~Z U~ z JO # ~= i I z Z° ~~ O ~~ 4W o ~ xw ~~ d ~~" I ~v ~ wz ~~ V tQW I Otn I - I I I - - - - - - I 1N~WS5`d~ ~S~ I I - - I - - I Iz w -~wU' - w I -~-- ~ I N ~- Q W r M ~ ~~T I ry d N ~ZI ~ S' SX ~~ I i ~ ~~ S I -~ I ~ I I ~~6 s I ~ ~I -- ~ --~-}------- ~ o I ~ W ~ I ~ ~ d ° I > i ~ ~~ Q ~ Z z p o z I N ~ w D ~ , O wd Q ~ ~ ~ -- _ I ~~ a. ~ wp w ~~ ~ V m ~ m ~ ~w ~ z d w I l U tfl~ w X ..t I I ~ ~ I wV I m I Q II ~ I . I w I ~ I N ~ Y r 0 H g- ~ V ` - A •. y - - P 1 xyo E, W I LLEITA 1AE ~ w tv / Wµ~ C . ~4UXH pAR ~ -~p a •o rn ~~ / ~ .r ~ trfr b ¢ a 1,a~.1TP b OR. ~ DR ,~/ . ~q~ ~ ~ H.37UR~ER ~ N F FONT~FA~~~_ ~'?' ~ ~ THE ~ MLEY EV4LE RD. . '~TRiilL~ H I LL ~'ti C.~ ,{u~c~ ~ ct ,~ ~ a `~... .~s~ ~ p '• .°.ScrEF3 682 ~. KIRKWOOO E`p0 . /h BR~~Kp~o~°`~~ r`~{~\J' Q~ EEEfff ~, ~q~F,~` 3a~ ~P~ ~ x `~ NORTH 4 5_ 6 z 7_ 8 ~ 9 -' ~C -,-- ~ 1 ~,....... c..~ Z f0 G /~ ,/ cr.,, J7JI J716 JT/O J7Pf Y d :- I f D V J I r 1 I~p // // ~ ~ {{11 1 1 11 ~ ~ n • H 101 ~ O 110 ~ ' 62 ~ i ptw~~~ >1 -t~yh '-~ -'J.O.~ ~ ~~ ` 1.22 AC r// 2.2TCC e~ pa~ol i 8 ~ at- -i• 15° GI~ 1 58 34 •\ ~. ~ 2 3 4 ~ '•~' J ; °_ t~ G v t°7 \ 42'0 ~v a 1.12 Ac • ~ 1 •tT. ~ w J• -\ ./y ~~~ V ~ ~ 0~ Y 58.4 `n ~ -~- .-t ti{ -514 u 52 ~r ~ 43 ~ 58.4 1 'b ;e" p ~ 46 /~ -~ L01Ac ~o ` t Y -rJ r n 's~ ~58A9 ~ J6C9 1670 / ..~ r c {o O \ s {t.,. 58.1 r ` . \ ~ UI V(M Court ~~ J ~ \ Js/~ , 58.39 • w -b 49 ~ti~ J \ /~ 5_ ~ {pt ,~! ~" ' ~o 9. .1 r 5617 • • ~~ • ~ '\ 47 ~// r' I~J~`0~6ir-b~ , 5678 59 \ I ~ ~ V ~ J6/JJ t r ~ `r o • 4 ~~ ~ Se.zo 'o ~ I 3617 O /• I ,mss O u c' : ts/ ~ V ~ X.3 ~ r ~ J c IW is R / o GI 7c1• "~ P .~ ~ {~ ~ I A \~ tii{ ~ / 2\ Ji?? ~~~ P , 3 J a 3711 {f 1.96.c / 1~ 76 76s0 ,0 21• 1 t +1 .. % R" ^ ~ ` ~ ~ 7652 ~0 I /7 ~ , - ~4, AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 1997 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 1.01-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED BEHIND CARILION FAMILY MEDICINE ON BRAMBLETON AVENUE (TAX MAP N0. 77.09-4-52.1) IN THE WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2C TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF CARILION HEALTH CORP., INC. WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on August 19, 1997, and the second reading and public hearing were held September 23, 1997; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on September 2, 1997; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 1.01 acres, as described herein, and located behind Carilion Family Medicine on Brambleton Avenue (Tax Map Number 77.09-4- 52.1) in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of C-2C, General Commercial District, Conditional, to the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Carilion Health Corp., Inc. S-Y 3. That in 1984 rezoning of this property the owner of the property voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, accepted and the Petitioner/Owner is now requesting be removed: 4. That the owner of the property voluntarily proffers in writing the following condition which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts: (1) Petitioner does not intend to use the 25-foot easement from Garst Mill Road as access to the parking area and will take appropriate, legal measures to discourage the use of this easement to access the proposed parking lot. 5. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at an iron pin located at the southeast corner of the property of Thomas R. Watkins and Linda W. Watkins as shown on survey made by T. P. Parker & Son, E&S, dated May 15, 1979, a copy of which survey is of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 1132, page 453; C:\OFFICE\WPWIN\WPDOCS\AGENDA\ZONING\CARILION.RZN 2 sy thence along the eastern line of the property of Watkins, N. 32° 00' W. 150.0 feet to a point located on the line of the 14.68 acre tract conveyed to Southern Land Company; thence with same, N. 58° 00' E. 330.0 feet to a point; thence along a new line through the property of Southern Land Company, S. 32 00' E. 110.0 feet to a point located at the northeast corner of the property of Charles R. Simpson and Naomi G. Simpson as shown on plat made by T. P. Parker & Son, E&S, dated June 18, 1980, of record in the Clerk's Office aforesaid in Deed Book 1147, page 748; thence with the property of Simpson, S. 58° 00' W. 130.0 feet to a point; thence S. 32° 00' E. 40.0 feet to a point located on the line of the property described as Moore's Building Supply; thence with same, S. 58° 00' W. 200.0 feet to the Place of Beginning, and containing 1.01 acres, and being further described as Tax Map No. 77.09-4-52.1. 6. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. C:\OFFICE\WPWIN\WPDOCS\AGENDA\ZONING\CARILION.RZN 3 ., s ~~~ /~ • . AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 1997 ORDINANCE 092397-12 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO VALLEY WORD MINISTRIES TO EXPAND THE EXISTING FACILITY LOCATED AT 1928 LOCH HAVEN DRIVE (TAX MAP NO. 36.07-1-4.1), CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Valley Word Ministries has filed a petition to expand the existing facility located at 1928 Loch Haven Drive (Tax Map No. 36.07-1-4.1) in the Catawba Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on September 2, 1997; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on August 19, 1997; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on September 23, 1997. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board f finds that the granting of a special use permit to Valley Word Ministries to expand the existing facility located at 1928 Loch Haven Drive (Tax Map No. 36.07-1-4.1) in the Catawba Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1- 456 of the 1950 Code of. Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved. 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Harrison to adopt the ordinance, J and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: ~• Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board cc: File Arnold Covey, Engineering and Inspection Terry Harrington, Planning and Zoning John Birckhead, Real Estate Assessments Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney S5 PETITIONER: VALLEY WORD MINISTRIES CASE NUMBER: 30/9-97 Planning Commission Hearing Date: September 2, 1997 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: September 23, 1997 A. REQUEST Petition of Valley Word Ministries for a Special Use Permit to expand the existing facility, located at 1928 Loch Haven Drive, Catawba Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS Adam Honeycut who is with the adjoining Hanging Rock Animal Hospital expressed his support of the expansion. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION Ms. Hooker asked what type of screening and buffering will be required between the house and church. Staff said that it would consist of a combination of trees and shrubs. D. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS None. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Ms. Hooker moved to recommend approval of the petition. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Robinson, Thomason, Hooker, Witt, Ross NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report ther `6 Terrance Harrin n, Secre Roanoke Cou Plannin Commission ~;'; m ,~"'° • PETITIONER: Valley Word Ministries PREPARED BY: Gary Mitchell • CASE NUMBER: 30-9-97 A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DATE:. August 20, 1997 This is a request for a Special Use Permit to allow the expansion of an existing religious assembly facility. This request is consistent with the Development land use designation and the Comprehensive Plan. There aren't any negative impacts anticipated. B. DESCRIPTION This is a request for a Special Use Permit to expand an existing religious assembly facility. The existing building is 18,904 square feet and the proposed addition is 12,320 square feet. This expansion will enlarge the entire facility to 31,224 square feet. The addition will be used for a community activity center. The surrounding area is characterized by low density residential development. The property is zoned as Agricultural Residential (AR). The property is located in the Catawba Magisterial District. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS • Site plan review is required. • In the AR zoning district, a special use permit is required for major expansion of religious assembly if the expansion - exceeds 7,500 square feet - exceeds the existing floor area by more than 100 percent - includes a principal ~rrorship area expansion of more than 50 percent The petitioner's request requires a Special Use Permit because it exceeds 7,500 square feet. • Type C buffer yard is required where the parking area adjoins a residential use type. • Compliance with on-site stormwater management and related development regulations is required. • S • A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Location -The church is located at 1928 Loch Haven Drive, in the Hollins Community Planning Area. Zo~ogr~hy/Vegetation - To the north the land is heavily wooded and rises up a steep slope. To the south and west the property is grassed and drops down along side a tributary of Peters Creek. This area is within a 100 year floodplain as shown on the sketch plan submitted with the application. To the east the property has a steep slope where the pad site for the existing building and some of the parking area was cut out of the hill side. To the rear and east of the existing building is an area of substantial soil erosion along this steep slope. Finally, there is a 100 foot wide, AEP easement running across the approximate center of the property, from west to east which is shown on the sketch plat provided by the applicant. Surrounding Neighborhood - The surrounding uses are zoned as Agricultural Residential (AR) and Agricultural 3 (AG3), which are low density residential land uses. Southwest of the property is an existing animal clinic, which is zoned as C-1. Approximately'/2 mile to the west of the property is the American Electric Power office building which is zoned I-2. B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ~ -The request is for a Special Use Permit to expand the existing religious assembly building. The proposed plans are to construct a 12,320 square foot Community Activity Center directly behind (north) the existing building. On an adjoining parcel, which is owned by the applicant, there is an existing single family residence. Upon speaking to Pastor Crabtree he stated that the residence is used as a parsonage for the maintenance staff of the church. The general area surrounding the site is single-family residential. Access -The access would remain the same. The existing access is composed of 2 drives, one for entering the facility and the other for exiting the site. Circulation & Parkins -There are two access points from the parking lot onto Loch Haven Drive. One drive is designated for entry while the other is designated as an exit. The existing site has a total of 86,807 square feet of parking area (1.99+ acres). Of this 51,607 square feet or 1.18+ acres is paved. The remaining area is covered with gravel. Since the seating capacity of the facility is not being increased the existing parking is sufficient. Traffic Count -There were 1,400 vehicles per day on .Loch Haven Drive in 1997. The Institute for Traffic Engineers does not provide traffic estimates for this type of expansion. Fire & R ~ -The existing Fire/rescue drives around the building will be maintained. ~- Utilities -The site is currently served by public water and septic. The existing septic field • is shown on the sketch plan to the left of the church. The applicant shows a proposed sanitary sewer lateral extension within a 10 foot private easement. The applicant will install the lateral and a pump station which will remain under the ownership of the church. C. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan designates this area as Neighborhood Conservation. The proposed expansion of a religious assembly use is consistent with this designation and the land use principles and guidelines of the plan. Specifically, Policy NC- 6encourages the development of neighborhood activity centers within convenient distance to existing housing. This includes churches and non-profit community uses. D. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A major expansion of religious assembly in the AR zoning district requires a Special Use Permit. Site plan review is required, and stormwater management will be necessary to account for the increased runoff from new development. The applicant appears to have ample space to conform with all applicable design standards. A. STAFF CONCLUSIONS The a licant's re nest for a S ecial Use Permit to ex and an existin reli ious a m I pp q p p g g sse b y is consistent with the County's Comprehensive Plan. The site has ample space to comply with all development regulations and design standards within the zoning ordinance. There aren't any negative impacts anticipated. • For staff use only ,~~ n t COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 5204 Bernard t~r.•. • P.O. Box 29800 • Roanoke, VA 24018 ( 540' 772-2068 FAX (5!:0) 772=21 08 dat ce eived:' received by: app(i anon (ee• ~ PC/5~;. da;e .z 9 7 pla 's$ ~d: 30S~a;e: :Z ~ ~ 7 CaS NU tT ~ Location or propery: APPROXIMATELY Tax Map Number: 3 (; 0 7 -- 1-- 4 . 1 ONE MILE FROM INTERSECTION OF ,;,{agisterial District: 419 AND LOCH HAVEN DR. CATAwBA Community Planning Area: Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: AR _ ~,~__ __ acres Existing Land Use: RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY sq.ft. F~:::::~:;:~:~:::~:~ ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::;:::~:::::~:~:~:~:~:~:~:=:~:~:~:::~:::::~:::::;::::::::::::::::::::::::~:~:=:~:~:::~:::~::s~:=:~:::::::::::::::::::=:=:=:::::::::::::::::::::::::~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::_: ~ :: '. 3 ::~:: . F ~. Proposed Zoning: A R ro~ s;ai7 use c.-: Proposed Land Use: RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY iuSeTYpe: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, vr,~: and frontage requirements of the requested dis:-:~:? YES X NO IF N0, A V.,'I~.tiCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for t`. requested Use Type? YES X NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If reZOning fegU2Si, are conditions being pror;er_d '.with this request? YES N/q NQ ..~:..: . . ~ .:: .. ~~ ~.. Variance of Section(s) o. the Roanoke County g Zonis Ordinanc_ in cr~_: to: N/A Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION ~/ILL NOT EE ACCEPTED IF ~.~NY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v ws v ws v Consultation ~ 8 1 /2" x i i " concept plan Application fee Application ~''~=<: Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable Justification ~~ Water and sewer application Adjoining property o~vnars /hereby certify that / am either the or~ner o/the property or the ov~ner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting t~iith the knowled~Ta e Ja~nd coo^se~ f~-t~e o ~~ner. O~finer's Signature: f7/ /(~~,Q(I,~/~ ~ ~! T7~_ i-o~ Staff Use Only: Case Number ~~ Flzt•f ~~7f~i~.~I?~~t~f~3~1'•t_~,~~~R1fi)`!T``R~~~`i~C~"i'`:;; icant VALLEY WORD MINISTRIES The Planning Commission will study rezoning and svecisl use permit requests to determine the need sr~c justification for the change in terms of public healt`~, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the fel:c~:;ing questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additions; space if necessary. rlease explain ho~v the request furthers the purposes or the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well ss ;`.e purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zo; ping district classification in the zoning ordinance. THE PROJECT PROVIDES FOR CONVENIENCE OF ACCESS AND SAFETY, DOES NOT CONTRIBUTE TO CONGESTION IN THE PUBLIC STREETS, AND CONTRIBUTES TO A CONVENIENT, ATTRACTIVE AND HARMONIOUS COMMUNITY. THE EXPANDED BUILDING WILL ADD OPPORTUNITIES FOR COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT. THE PROJECT DOES NOT DESTROY ANY HISTORIC BUILDINGS OR AREAS. THE PROPOSED DENSITY IS IV KEEPING WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND COMPLIES WITH THE ZONING ORDINANCE. THE PROJECT WILL NOT IMPACT SURFACE OR GROUNDWATER RESOURCES. se explain how the project conforms to the S=^eral guid=lines and policies contained in the Roancke Ocunty prehensive Plan. THE SITE IS DESIGNATED~~COMMUNITY ACTIVITY CENTER.~~ THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LISTS CHURCHES AS AMONG DESIRABLE LAND USE TYPES WITHIN COMMUNITY ACTIVITY CENTER AREAS. THE PROPOSED PLAN CONFORMS WITH THE LAND USE GUIDELINES IN THAT IT PROTECTS THE RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD FROM DISRUPTIVE IMPACTS OF LAND USE CHANGES. THE PLAN EXPANDS A NEIGHBORHOOD ACTIVITY CENTER WHICH IS ALREADY WITHIN CONVENIENT DISTANCE TO EXISTING HOUSING. THE SCALE OF THE PROJECT IS IN KEEPING WITH THE SITE AND TH NEIGHBORHOOD. i I ~Flease describe the impact(s) or the request on t~~e prcpery itself, the adjoining properties, and the sur~;:r.ding area, as well as the impacts on public services and fsciiities, including water/server, roads, schools, 'I parks/recreation; and fire/rescue. THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL HAVE MINIMAL IMPACT ON THE ADJOINING PROPERTIES WITH REGARD TO WATER, SEWER, ROADS AND FIRE~RESCUE. SINCE WE ARE NOT EXPANSING THE SEATING CAPACITY THERE WILL BE LITTLE OUTSIDE EFFECT. THE EXPANSION•WILL BE BUILT BEHIND THE EXISTING BUILDING IN SUCH A WAY THAT IT WILL NOT BE SEEN FROM _ . THE ROAD. THE EXPANSION WILL NOT CHANGE THE STORM WATER RUN OFF TO A GREAT DEGREE. ,FIRE/RESCUE PATHS WILL BE MAINTAINED WITH ADEQUATE WATER PRESSURE FOR AN EMERGENCY. • - ?-t4 1* -„j .T _}yteT w y .. j :b. ~: c:~,t:- G `~, ~~r ~M ~ y ~ o~ C SC I~ .. . I ~ ~ N O ~ ~ .+ w~ O ~ ~ p"' I I : y I ~ o -b w5 ae I Ix oo o a ` y rn I 0 I ~ 0 I I I O ~ 9 I -- ro t x I .~ N O. I O O _ y I a r ~ ~-_ ,~ GX I T z y y ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~ . I I v I ~ y \ ! v I a < ~ a0 I n- ~N~ ~ ` \ I ~y x ~ ~ II _ ~ f - \ I ~ ~ ~ ~ _ I r \ -\ I wo n r I ~ ~~ L - -~ - - - ' y I w ~ r . 7 ~ oX r , r ro x~ ti eo r ~ ' !~ ~9 I r I '~ 0 ' ' 9 r I x n Z ~ ' y rn >C .~ o I ----- - - - - J b / r ~ ° ~ y ~~ r ~ a „ti s~ ~ I ~o ~ ~o W y N !C ~ c i~ X ~s °o~ ~ ,. b I . ~ wz o Ix ~o I I x m m y ~. I o I w r~ ...n~ I I ~ I I I I I rnx I I o~ I I .! I 1 Iz l~ mo -3 ~ w~ / rn / 09 Iro / / ~Z ~ ~ O I ~ 1 w oa I ,b ~ I aT ~ / ~ ~ 1 .~ ./~' i ~ ~, `~ ~ a~ ~ ~~ \~~~\ ,~~, ~~~ N~ \ \ CT O ~ \ \ la N 'D 00 I l 1 1 1 ~ 1 l 1 I • • s~ ~~F ~.. ~ \ ~sp• SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION _ L A N ~ - DATE JULY 25, 1997 SCALE:,- = 250' VALLEY WORD MINISTRIES JOB No.: 970616' DRAWN BY: MMB LOCH HAVEN DRIVE e n g i n e e r i n g c o_ ACRD /: 9706162 CHKD: RGL CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA Consulting Engineers • Lend Planners P.0. BOX 7566 ROANOKE, vA. 2t0~9 (St0)366-4600 0 1 5 250 500 X000 3~~ 7 yG.r.~~"76~'f r_. -< ^' .(~ - .. 3~ 9~ ~_ ~8 ~a OB sps >J ~a ~~ ~" ~~ _° i 0 n z o ~ ~o ~-o / / ,~~ z '< / r7 2 y / / 9 Y R A ~o os~ _ / b O ~ =~° 'c~ 7 K _ ~ / \ ~ ~ 1 ~ / \ ~ ~ J1 zC _~ ~ ~ ` ~ \ r Z ~ o z zQ n ~ p b '~ 6°° / ~ ° ~> o o n ~N ~g pS ~~ ~~ I ;g `~ 'N ' I ~~ ~ [`7 ,.-3 W a~ ~o I iRRRi I ~a ~'~ vn ~p z e O I I I ~~ ~ SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION _ LAN C VALLEY WORD MINISTRIES LOCH HAVEN DRIVE engineering co. CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Consulting Engineers • Lend Planners ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA P.D. eox 7566 ROANOKE. vA. 24019 (540)366-4800 S-5 i ~I ~~ tl ~~ ~I I' i 'l i i i/ (i I , 1 I 1 I ' i / / // /// ~~ l ~ \ ~a \~t ~~~ ~~~ ~I ~ c ~.. ~° \ ~ ~ `~ 2sO \ \ \ -. OAiE: JULY 25, 1997 SCALE: t' 250' JOB No.: 970616 DRAMM AY: MIAA ACRD /: 9706t6Z CNKD: RCL . 0 t25 250 500 1000 '9 C I i ,- S- J ~ ~ ~ fl '^ _ ,', e m ti i ~j ~ ~/ £ ! \~ 1 ~ ~1/ Cl - ~ - iI i - - ~ ~ •f ~ ~. ~ ~ l ' ~ ~ ~\ -; _ _ _ it ,~ ~ i , - i~ !~ ~ ---- - -- _~ '; f ~ i _____.___== =_-~ ~~ ~ F 1 ~, _ _ ~ ~ ~ /~~J~ " _ I _ ! _ it 3 = " j t _. -~ 1. .. ii i li ~ -- ~ i ,-~; -,~ s; ~, .~ '' ~' = J ~~ ~~ Gi ,~~ ~ ~~:, -'1 ~ ~' L` i ,~ 4~:~n>+~ Fm ire I - ~~.. I J^ 5;- ~.:3 ~ ~ ac., • S., wo 23.04 r •200' ~ i ~ P10 76.10-1141 / ~ ~ . ~ , as~ac ,~+'' ~: ~ ~ ~; ~~ VALLEY WORD MINISTRIES _ `, DEPAP,Zi~I'I' OF PLP.NNIh'G SPECIAL USE PERMIT ~~ prm zotvnvc 36.07-1-4.1. ~ .~ . •„ S-5 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 1997 ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO VALLEY WORD MINISTRIES TO EXPAND THE EXISTING FACILITY LOCATED AT 1928 LOCH HAVEN DRIVE (TAX MAP N0. 36.07-1-4.1), CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Valley Word Ministries has filed a petition to expand the existing facility located at 1928 Loch Haven Drive (Tax Map No. 36.07-1-4.1) in the Catawba Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on September 2, 1997; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on August 19, 1997; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on September 23, 1997. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Valley Word Ministries to expand the existing facility located at 1928 Loch Haven Drive (Tax Map No. 36.07-1-4.1) in the Catawba Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1-456 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved. 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. C:\OFFICE\WPWIN\WPDOCS\AGENDA\ZONING\VALLEYWR.SUP 1 5-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 1997 ORDINANCE 092397-13 AUTHORIZING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A FIVE YEAR PERIOD TO ALLOW SUMMER CONCERTS TO BE HELD AT VALLEYPOINTE (TAX MAP NO. 37.07-1-14.6) IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT UPON THE APPLICATION OF THE EASTER SEAL SOCIETY OF VIRGINIA, INC. WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on August 19, 1997, and the second reading and public hearing was held September 23, 1997; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on September 2, 1997; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That a special use permit for a five year period ending September 30, 2002, allowing summer concerts to be held from April until September of each year on a certain tract of real estate containing approximately 2.4 acres (Tax Map Number 37.07-1-14.6) located at Valleypointe Corporate Development Community in the Hollins Magisterial District is hereby authorized. 2. That the applicant has voluntarily proffered the following conditions on the special use permit which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: (1) Applicant shall be responsible for complying with all Use and Design Standards contained in § 30-87-3 of the Zoning Ordinance. Strategies for compliance shall be as generally outlined in the application materials dated November 13, 1992, and shall include the hiring of personnel to provide on-site security and direct traffic flow. Off-street r parking areas shall be provided using off-street parking areas within Valleypointe. Adequate traffic lanes shall be preserved on all streets within Valleypointe. If parking is provided on Valleypointe Blvd., it shall be parallel parking only. (2) If the current site of the concert series becomes unavailable within the next five years due to the development of the property, the Zoning Administrator shall have the authority to approve an alternative site for the concert series within the corporate center. (3) The Special Use Permit shall run through the 2002 concert series. 3. That this action is taken upon the application of The Easter Seal Society of Virginia, Inc. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: Y ..~• Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board cc: File Arnold Covey, Engineering and Inspection Terry Harrington, Planning and Zoning John Birckhead, Real Estate Assessments Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney sb PETITIONER: THE EASTER SEAL SOCIETY OF VA INC. CASE NUMBER: 31-9/97 Planning Commission Hearing Date: September 2, 1997 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: September 23, 1997 A. REQUEST Petition of The Easter Seal Society of VA, Inc. to obtain a Special Use Permit to allow summer concerts, located in Valleypointe, Hollins Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION In response to the Commission, Ms. Scheid said only one complaint was received by staff and it was quickly resolved. D. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS 1) The applicant shall be responsible for complying with all of the Use and Design Standards contained in Section 30-87-3 of the zoning ordinance. Strategies for compliance shall be as generally outlined in the application materials originally dated November 13, 1992 and shall include the hiring of personnel to provide on-site security and direct traffic flow. Off-street parking shall be provided using off-street parking areas within Valleypointe. Adequate traffic lanes shall be preserved on all streets within Valleypointe. If parking is provided on Valleypointe Blvd., it shall be parallel parking only. 2) If the current site of the concert series becomes unavailable within the next five years due to the development of the property, the zoning administrator shall have the authority to approve an alternative site for the concert series within the corporate center. 3) The Special Use Permit shall run through the 2002 concert series. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Robinson moved to recommend approval of the petition. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Robinson, Thomason, Hooker, Witt, Ross NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report _ Other Terrance Harrin n, Secret Roanoke Co ty Planning ommission ~ ~Q ' Roanoke County Department of Planning Memorandum TO: Planning Commission FROM: Terrance L. Harrington, AICP '""' Director of Planning DATE: August 25, 1997 RE: Renewal of Outdoor Gathering Special Use Permit for Valleypointe After Hours; Easter Seal Society of Virginia. This is a request to renew an existing Outdoor Gathering Special Use Permit for Valleypointe After Hours, an outdoor summer concert series sponsored by the Easter Seal Society of Virginia.(ESSV) The concert series is held at Valleypointe Corporate Center on Valleypointe Parkway. The concert series began in the Summer of 1990 and has been held each summer. Four successive SUP's have been issued for these events. The first three SUP's were issued in 1990, 1991 and 1992 for one year periods. In 1993, the SUP was issued for a five year period. This permit expires at the end of this year's concerts. The Use and Design Standards for Outdoor Gatherings require that applicants provide information on how issues such as sanitation, security, parking, traffic circulation, lighting and noise will be addressed. For the 1993 SUP, the applicant provided an event management plan that outlined their proposals for meeting the use and design standards. This plan was reflected in the SUP conditions attached in 1993, and has been used by the applicant as a guide for each years' concerts. Although the plan is somewhat dated in the usage and parking data it supplies, it does continue to reflect the operating policies of the ESSV for the concert series. Since it's first year, Valleypointe After Hours has had an excellent operating record and has consistently complied with the terms of the SUPS issued. In May of 1996, staff received one complaint from an employee of a business in Valleypointe who complained that cars parked on Valleypointe Parkway blocked the view of Vehicles exiting ValleyPark Drive. The ESSV quickly resolved the problem at future concerts by prohibiting vehicles S-6 from parking near the intersection. The staff recommends that the outdoor Valleypointe After Hours renewed for a five similar conditions attached in 1993. These gathering SUP for year period with the conditions are: 1. The applicant shall be responsible for complying with all of the Use and Design Standards contained in Section 30-87-3 of the zoning ordinance. Strategies for compliance shall be as generally outlined in the application materials originally dated November 13, 1992 and shall include the hiring of personnel to provide on-site security and direct traffic flow. Off•-street parking shall be provided using off-street parking areas within Valleypointe. Adequate traffic lanes shall be preserved on all streets within Valleypointe. If parking is provided on Valleypointe Blvd., it shall be parallel parking only. 2. If the current site of the concert series becomes unavailable within the next five years due to the development of the property, the zoning administrator shall have the authority to approve an alternative site for the concert series within the corporate center. 3. The Special Use Permit shall run through the 2002 concert series. • • 11/13/92 The Easter Seal Society of Virginia, Inc. ~p ' Valleypointe After Hours Special Use Permit Application Sec. 30-87-3 Outdoor Gatherings (A) General Standards 1. The Easter Seal Society of Virginia, Inc., anot-for-profit voluntary health agency headquartered in Roanoke, has produced an outdoor concert series in North Roanoke County on a vacant lot at the Valleypointe Corporate Center for the last three years as a fundraiser to support services and programs offered by Easter Seals for children and adults with disabilities. As a result of the format and good reputation, this concert series which features a variety of popular, "oldies" and beach music has attracted a wide variety of patrons from within the Roanoke Valley as well as Lynchburg, Martinsville, Charlottesville, Montgomery, Botetourt, and Franklin. Counties. The early evening outdoor concerts appeal to a diversity of age groups which is apparent at any concert, ranging from young families to a more mature audience. The concert area opens at 5:15 p.m. each Thursday evening; the music begins at 6 p.m. and concludes at 8:30 p.m. While the attendance is frequently impacted by the weather conditions and varies according to the entertainment scheduled, the 1992 season attendance was 33,000 persons. In 1991, the season attendance was 41,000, and in 1990, it was 25,000. Based on these three consecutive reporting concert seasons, the average annual attendance is 33,000 persons, or a weekly average attendance of 1,833 persons. With good weather, a more realistic weekly attendance would be about 2,200 - 2,300 people. The concerts are held on undeveloped Lot #2 at the Valleypointe Corporate Center. A wire fence has been placed around the site for security, crowd control and sale of alcoholic beverages (beer and wine coolers). There is one main entrance off of Valleypointe Parkway and one entrance and the southwest side of the lot for delivery of equipment and supplies. A stage area and dance floor remains on the site. Except for the portolets that are placed there for the season, all materials and supplies needed for each concert are placed on the site prior to each concert and removed at the close of the evening. The Easter Seal Society secures all applicable permits and pays applicable taxes to appropriate state and locality. This application bequest for a Special Use Permit is for the period from April to September, which will allow for any bad weather dates. . Page 2 11/ 13/92 Valleypointe After Hours ~ ' 2. L"~ a. The Easter Seal Society provides outdoor portolets, including one that is accessible to people with disabilities, for the concert attendees through a private contractor who services them the morning after each concert. A screening fence around the area where the portolets are placed was put in place at the beginning of the 1992 season to obscure them from the view of neighboring businesses. Additionally, all trash is collected and placed in trash receptacles at the close of each concert so that the site is restored and clean. Food (hot dogs, hamburgers, etc.) and alternative beverages (soft drinks, bottled water and juices) are available at the site for the concert attendees and volunteers. Since the concert activities on the site occur only in the early evening once a week, overnight lodging is not provided. b. The Easter Seal Society believes that a safe event provides long-term benefits that enhance a special event such as Valleypointe After Hours. To this end, off-duty Roanoke County Sheriffs Department personnel are employed to provide on-site security and to assist with traffic flow. Some of these men and women have received Emergency Medical Training through their employment. Additionally, the Hollins Fire and Rescue Squad Station is located within 2.5 miles of the concert site in the event that there is an emergency for which on-site personnel need assistance. c. Parking for the concert attendees and volunteers has been achieved through the use of the paved parking areas for the Valleypointe Corporate Center complex, and supervised parking within the owner-authorized, undeveloped areas of the center. Last year parking along the main street, Valleypointe Parkway, was changed from diagonal to parallel. At no time is anyone permitted to obstruct all traffic lanes on Valleypointe Parkway or any other side street within the corporate center. Using information from the previous years' request for permits, the estimates of spaces available for offstreet parking are as follows: Lot #16 145 Lot # 1 435 Lot #2 80 Lot #3 68 Lot #10 17 Lot # 4 200 Lot # 14 176 (51 paved; 100-.125 unpaved) Lot # l OC 50 Lot 313 76 1,247 possible spaces • Again, using the Planning Department's previous estimates of 2-3 people per car, the offstreet parking could optimally accommodate 2,494 people with 2 people per car; the offstreet parking could accommodate 3,741 people with 3 people per car. 11/13/92 Page 3 - . " Valleypointe After Hours ~~ ~ It should be noted that in both of the last two concert seasons, a shuttle service has been offered to help attendees in and out of the concert area. Even with extensive media promotion for the shuttle service, it has not been successful either year. d. Off-duty Roanoke County Sheriffs Department deputies are hired to help direct traffic in an out of the concert area and assist Easter Seal staff and volunteers with the parking needs for the concerts. 'I~vo lanes of Valleypointe Parkway always remain open for smooth traffic flow from Woodhaven to Peters Creek Road. A stop light at Peters Creek Road allows for ingress and egress from Valleypointe Corporate Center and I-581 near the site also provides for additional traffic movement. e. Since the concert series is conducted at a time of the year when the days are longest, there is not a need to install lighting for the conduct of the event. If it is necessary, some portable stage lights are provided for the entertainment and are always directed toward and illuminating the stage area. f. The Easter Seal Society moved and redirected the stage in 1991 to eliminate the flow of sound into residential areas. A sound meter is used to measure the decibel level of the bands and to keep it within an acceptable range and the speakers for amplification are directed downward to curb the carry of sound from the site. • • ^~~ 7 ~~ ~" t-. ~- ^ *: _ ; ~ ` Serving Disabled Children E Adults ._--~ stLSan s. might Vice-President Roanoke-~iue Ridge Region i ROANOKE NN1NG AND ZONING r.- The Easter Seal Society o! Virginia, Inc. 4841 Williamson Road P. O. Box 5496 ~ 1 8 Roanoke, Vvginia 24012 F;^.,; (~ L; 0) 77 2 - 2 1 0 8 (540) 362-1656 • 1-800-365-1656 (540) 563-8928 ?DD/FAX For staff use only ~^°`~'~~~ date receiv d•' eceived `r: app~~O n~e: PC/EZA da:a~ placards issued: ~ P1 a. ~t oOS da;=• Case Number: /Y /~ Owner's name: ~i~E~t.7- ~n~sp~.ZT ~cv. C~r~. Phone: - Address: ~~ S 3 ^U={ ~ • ~ Zip Code:~~ { ` ; /i tGl•+~~o•urJ / Location of property: ~~~.. ~ ~ Tax Map Number: -"- v ~ O7 _ ~ _~y, ~• ~,G~I/~y ~~,^~-d CO,R L'E„fC/~~ ~•lagisterial District: ~/f~^,~ Community Planning Area: ~ETEF_C ~!'~ F Size of parcel (s}: ~ Existing Zoning: ~-/ Does the parts( meet the minimum lot area, ~;~idth, and frontage requirements of the requested dis:::c:? YES _ ~~ NO IF N0, A V;^-.-i~.~~CE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria fcr ;-= requested Use Type? YES NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being prcff_:=_~ •;~ith this request? YES NO Variance of Section(s) o. the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance it c:~_: ;o: Is the application complete? Please check if enclcsed. APPLICATION WILL I~tOT EE ACCEPTED IF r.~\Y OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR I_NCOMPLE T E. • ws v ws v ws v Consultation 8 1!2" x i i' concept plan Application fee _ ,:,.. Application '.:.ku Metes and hounds description Proffers, if applicable zua Justification ~~:~ .Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners l hereb y certify that l am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledsye and consent of~i•;e owr7er. s r Owner's Signature: ~.._ ~~~~ ~~~ ~ya~~ .r"J 1 / t.)~'9~ sa =~~~i `: BO:aAD OF DIRECTORS ~~,:~::. hairman of the Board --=-•?. Hamlett, Roanoke irs:1'ice Chairman ;e: ~. Neathawk, Richmond zcond Vice Chairman ~._.~ .~. Barbour, Esq., Roanoke ~z C. Lansford, Roanoke reasurer =:zs ?1. Hudgins, Jr., Salem lu:..,,..: ~ ._ - i. 3reit, Fredericksburg -_ - M. 3uckley, Falls Church •. >= ay 3ullock, Jr., Richmond E-=ar: R. ney, Centreville :.;r..as ~ Haake, Centreville : -opkins, Ashland '_:1:3. -udson, Falls Church `:•z,~:i. Hutton, Mechanicsville a~.t ;1 e. Roanoke z:=: McCzll, Lynchburg ?_-ca;f McGuire, Richmond __ A. Moats, Woodbridge .=r~'.t~. Morris, Virginia Bzach ha, Jr., Salem 'z^r s, Roanoke .z_r. ,bTidlothian _-_ z: P11en Thomas, Newport News :r; R. LVhelan, Roanoke -_.zs A. Wilson, Cullen -,c. tt'm^, Falls Church =_ez^ Knight -` <adquarters ;tit Williamson Rd. - .^.. Box 5496 ';.anoke Va. 24012-2390 _i0) 362.1656 (local) f:Q365-1656 (Va. only) 5<0) 563-8923 (fax) ~l -: ZJ =3.9 Castle PI., Suite .9. =s::sChurch, Va. 22044-1907 -31538.4480 (phone) _:?) 237-0249 (fax) .-J31538-zao7 tT-1~ gx 1 Laurel Grove Road, Suite 2 ?techanicsville, Va. 23 1 16-2969 iSL-0) 746-1007 (Phone) :SC4) 746-9214 (fax) 3101 Magic Hollow Blvd. ~aginia Beach, Va. 23456-3010 (I5~ 468-3140 (phone) ('S7) 46&3452 (fax) Mailing Address: P.O. Boz 9185 V•'eginia Beach, Va. 23450-9185 Gmp Easter Saal-East 20500 Easter5eal Dr. hfiMord, Va. 22514-9730 9855 stet Seal-West 2, Box 534 New Castle, Va. 24127-9566 (540) 864-5750 Federal Tax I.D. *54-0515735 The Easter Seal Society of Virginia, Inc. a ao~iet~y °~ ca~uc y ~ie.cdQ. July 15, 1997 Terrance L. Hamngton, AICP Director of Planning County of Roanoke, Virginia Post Office Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 Dear Terry: Thank you for the opportunity to make application to The County of Roanoke to renew our special use permit so that we may continue The Valleypointe After Hours Concert Series. As I mentioned to you, we do have the endorsement of our hosts, Liberty Property Trust, for this application process. There are no major changes from when we last made application 5 years ago except for the development which continues within the corporate park. This affords more defined par'.{ing areas around the completed buildings in addition to what the county permits us to have on Valleypointe Parkway during the concert season from 5 to 9 p.m. Certainly, I will be happy to provide you with any additional supporting information or answer any questions prior to the meetings. Feel free to call -- except on Thursdays. Sincerely, / ^~ I /C-~~'~G /l'~.~ Susan S. Knight Vice President Roanoke-Blue Ridge Region ~S Enclosure . -- ~ - cc: Robert Crawford - Liberty Property Development Corp. Formerly The Easter Seal Society for Crippled Children and Adults, Inc. of Vircinia ~~~ ~~~ L ,off .. J ~`?~ P d ~- 'Pd . ~~~1~ o- .::~.~. -oaar.~t~on ~' ~f ~~~ ~ t ~d~ j~ o Q~ p- X11, ~^ ~i r ~~ V ~ ~_, Y ' ~ ~~, .~ ~ ~ /a, ~co~~ P ~, a~ 0 a~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ A c) v1 x 0 ~~,,,,// F~ z G:. ~ E"' W ~ ~ N J ~~. c x~ . ~~~ ~s a-,o s L V Y`Qr V /9~ o ~ ~~ ~~ '~-~ ~_ ~ .. .: ~~'k _, • ~ ~y h CORNERSTONE' K v ~ ~~ ~ ~ . v ~ CNU Cx 8 `~ ~` ~ ~~, Fp LEhiO TON °c,~::.. • ..:`':~. o~v ~. 4 ~.. ~`S±.p~~ ~~ vtc 3. M,+Revf C~R7 ///??'1+~ PEN7 CC \`~\Q'~ o,J. G .p -6 ,.~ /r~7 v~.~F a NOU o 5 r y ~s:'r -- -crF''X -- - _ y. ~ -- L i.1ix ~~/ c K 14.1 C 13a x ~t~ ~~~,,.~~` K.8 /V ~ 1. I a K.9 r' '..2 . `•,~ A / O O„ Qp7 *~~ S sasl •c R.o.ur .M~:ad ~+~.+ .~ 'p! . ~ ~? i ~? ~ ~ / / ~ ion ~ ~ I~H o x ~ / _c~.Fe ~~d o / Fr-' • ~.E, G .a _ ~ ~ ~ i I t•~ i ~ ~e~ .. i~~°+ ~ 6 ' 2 ~"~ Rt 1790 ~~ ~.~ ~- (R~e~ct U>» 7 _~ ~.~ ~.. .~~ ~" ' % ~. i .. _ ~ _ ~ ' = DEPART~IVT OF PLANNING EASTER SEAL SOCIETY OF VA - -- SPECIAL USE PERMIT pND zoNZrrG ~ 37.07-1-14.6 .a S-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 1997 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A FIVE YEAR PERIOD TO ALLOW SUMMER CONCERTS TO BE HELD AT VALLEYPOINTE (TAX MAP NO. 37.07-1-14.6) IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT UPON THE APPLICATION OF THE EASTER SEAL SOCIETY OF VIRGINIA, INC. WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on August 19, 1997, and the second reading and public hearing was held September 23, 1997; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on September 2, 1997; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That a special use permit for a five year period ending September 30, 2002, allowing summer concerts to be held from April until September of each year on a certain tract of real estate containing approximately 2.4 acres (Tax Map Number 37.07-1-14.6) located at Valleypointe Corporate Development Community in the Hollins Magisterial District is hereby authorized. 2. That the applicant has voluntarily proffered the following conditions on the special use permit which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: C:\OFFICE\WPWIN\WPDOCS\AGENDA\ZONING\EASTERSL.UNP 1 (1) Applicant shall be responsible for complying with all Use and Design Standards contained in § 30-87-3 of the Zoning Ordinance. Strategies for compliance shall be as generally outlined in the application materials dated November 13, 1992, and shall include the hiring of personnel to provide on-site security and direct traffic flow. Off-street parking areas shall be provided using off-street parking areas within Valleypointe. Adequate traffic lanes shall be preserved on all streets within Valleypointe. If parking is provided on Valleypointe Blvd., it shall be parallel parking only. (2) If the current site of the concert series becomes unavailable within the next five years due to the development of the property, the Zoning Administrator shall have the authority to approve an alternative site for the concert series within the corporate center. (3) The Special Use Permit shall run through the 2002 concert series. 3. That this action is taken upon the application of The Easter Seal Society of Virginia, Inc. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. C:\OFFICE\WPWIN\WPDOCS\AGENDA\ZONING\EASTERSL.UNP 2 S - ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 1997 ORDINANCE 092397-14 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 0.65-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED 130 FEET NORTHWEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF PETERS CREEK ROAD AND NORTHRIDGE LANE (TAX MAP N0. 37.14-1-6) IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF MARC I. WILSON WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on August 19, 1997, and the second reading and public hearing were held September 23, 1997; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on September 2, 1997; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 0.65 acres, as described herein, and located 130 feet northwest of the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northridge Lane (Tax Map Number 37.14-1-6) in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-l, Low Density Residential District, to the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of MARC I. 1 WILSON. 3. That the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts: (1) No junk vehicles will be stored outside. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the west side of Northridge Drive, said point being the southeasterly corner of the Dallas R. Keith property and the northeasterly corner of the Mattie E. James property; thence, with a line between the Dallas R. Keith and the Mattie E. James property, S. 78° 50' W. 274.1 feet to an old iron on the line of the Charlie Myers property; thence, with a line between the Charlie Myers property and the Mattie E. James property, S. 12° 00' E. 119.15 feet to an iron; thence, with a new line through the Mattie E. James property, N. 72° 00' E. 92.73 feet to an old axle, being a corner to the R.E. Lee property; thence, with a line between the R.E. Lee property and the Mattie E. James property, N. 70° 49' 30" E. 198.53 feet to an old iron on the west side of Northridge Drive; thence with the west side of Northridge Drive, N. 22° 32' W. 82.08 feet to the BEGINNING, and containing 0.65 acre, and being further described as Tax Map No. 37.14-1-6. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Harrison to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Johnson 2 NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: J'~ Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board cc: File Arnold Covey, Engineering and Inspection Terry Harrington, Planning and Zoning John Birckhead, Real Estate Assessments Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 3 s_~ PETITIONER: MARC I. WILSON CASE NUMBER: 32-9/97 Planning Commission Hearing Date: Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: September 2, 1997 September 23, 1997 A. REQUEST Petition of Marc I. Wilson to rezone 0.65 acre from R-1 to C-2 to allow a minor auto repair facility, located 130 feet northwest of the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northridge Lane, Catawba Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION Among the items discussed were hours of operation, potential for disabled vehicles on-site, the definition of minor automobile repair, the site's slope relative to Peters Creek Road and the likelihood that most traffic accessing the site will utilize Northridge Lane rather than Peters Creek Road. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS 1) No junk vehicles will be stored outside. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Ms. Hooker moved to recommend approval of the petition with proffered condition. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Robinson, Thomason, Hooker, Witt, Ross NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report _ Other Terrance Har ' gton, ecr ry Roanoke County Plann' g Commission S-~ STAFF REPORT . PETITIONER: MARC WILSON PREPARED BY: TIM BEARD CASE NUMBER: 8-3/96 DATE: SEPTEMBER 2, 1997 PARTI A. Executive Summary This is an unconditional request to rezone a 0.65 acre parcel from R-1 Residential to C-2 Commercial in order to construct and operate a minor automobile repair facility and professional offices. The proposal includes one 9,560 square foot, one- story building containing offices, an area for accessory retail and one large service bay. Single family residential, institutional, open space, retail, service and office commercial parcels make up the general area. The site is designated Transition by the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. B. Description Petition of Marc Wilson to rezone 0.65 acre from R-1 to C-2 to allow a minor auto repair facility, located 130 feet northwest of the intersection of Peters Creek Road and North i Ridge Lane, Catawba Magisterial District. C. Applicable Regulations Minor automobile repair and general office uses are permitted by right in the C-2 district. Use and design standards for auto repair include prohibitions on the exterior display of new or used auto parts and on overnight equipment or vehicle storage in front of the building line or within 35 feet of the public right-of-way, whichever is greater. No particular design standards apply to general offices. As an accessory use, the petitioner intends to utilize a small portion of the building for the retail sale of parts and accessories. The ordinance recognizes the sale of automobile parts as a permitted activity within minor auto repair as a commercial use type. The ordinance defines minor auto repair as the repair of, and the sale, installation and servicing of equipment and parts for automobiles, non- commercial trucks, motorcycles, motor homes, recreational vehicles or boats. Commercial entrance permits will be required by VDOT and the Roanoke City Engineer's office. Site development plans will be reviewed and approved by County staff prior to the issuance of a building permit. • S-9 PART II A. Analysis of Existing Conditions Location: The subject property is situated on the west side of North Ridge Lane, 130 feet (.025 mile) north of its intersection with Peters Creek Road. The parcel is in the Peters Creek Community Planning Area. Urban services are available to the site. TopographyNegetation: The site of the proposed project drops gently north to south. The 0.65 acre requested for rezoning contains dense deciduous vegetation while that portion of the overall site facing Peters Creek Road (already zoned C-2) contains a vacant single family residential structure and is generally wooded otherwise. Surrounding Neighborhood: The subject parcel is bordered by single family residences on the north (zoned R-1) and occupied and vacant single family residences to the south; one of which is the southern half of the proposed project (zoned C-2). St. Paul's Lutheran Church stands to the west (zoned R-1) and Melrose Baptist Church (zoned R-2) is found across North Ridge Lane on the east. Additional single family residential, institutional, and a variety of commercial uses exists nearby. B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Layout/Architecture: The petitioner's proposal includes one 1-story, "L" shaped 9,560 square foot building which would contain insurance and travel agency offices in addition to the primary automobile repair use. Masonry/brick and glass are proposed as exterior materials. The front of the structure (facing Peters Creek Road) would house offices and a showroom with the rear area enclosing the minor repair use. This area would be accessed by two garage doors feeding one large service bay capable of handling up to eight vehicles. A 2,200 to 2,300 square foot fenced parking area is also proposed towards the rear of the building. Asphalt parking and traffic aisles would be required. The parking requirements for minor automobile repair call for one space per employee on a major shift, plus one space per 200 square feet, plus two spaces per service bay. General office uses require 3'/2 spaces per 1,000 square feet of building. Stormwater management would likely be designed for the far southwest corner of the overall project site or beneath the parking lot. Final development design could be of any type permitted by zoning, engineering, building, and fire codes. Access/Traffic Generation: The applicant's concept plan proposes one access point each on Peters Creek Road and North Ridge Lane. Both accesses exceed VDOT design requirements for a multiple commercial entrance concept regarding distance to intersections. The 1994 ADT count for this portion of Peters Creek Road was 20,703 vehicles. North Ridge Lane's 1994 ADT count was 1,064 vehicles. Nine accidents were reported for the entire stretch of North ridge from 1994 to 1997, two of which occurred at its intersection with Peters Creek Road. Staff estimates total traffic generation in the 100-150 trip ends per day range including auto repair, related retail parts sales and office business. Screening & Buffering: In addition to the 25-foot buffer yard shown on the concept plan (Type D, Option 1 which would include 6-foot high screening and large and small evergreen trees) along the north boundary of the site. Type D screening and buffering would also be required along the west border with St. Paul's Lutheran Church. Also, along each right-of-way, a 6-foot wide planting strip including deciduous or large evergreen trees (one per 30 linear feet) and evergreen shrubs (one per five linear feet) are required. Interior parking lot landscaping at a rate of five percent of the total paved area will also be in effect. ,~'( 3 Fire & Rescue/Utilities: Emergency vehicle travel time is estimated at four minutes. This area is served by the Hollins station. Public water is presently ± 500 feet west of the subject site at the Peters Creek/North Lakes Drive intersection and sanitary sewer is found at the Peters Creek/ North Ridge Lane intersection. Drainage/Floodplain: A stormwater management basin is not indicated on the concept plan, but could be constructed in the extreme southwest corner of the overall site or beneath the parking lot. The entire project area is well above FEMA's 500-year floodplain. C. CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The subject parcel (0.65 acre) and adjoining tract to the south are designated Transition by the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. This category discourages general retail development and encourages office uses. The proposal is consistent with Policy TR-8 (provided signs are kept to a minimum and a prominent building facade is projected) and Policy TR-9 (provision of strict screening and buffering along residential borders). The proposal is not consistent with Policy TR-1 (prevent commercial sprawl along major highways), TR-2 (develop new retail uses in planned shopping centers) and TR-5 (limit conversion of detached houses into retail and office uses). • D. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD The proposed project can comply generally approval of site and building plans, erosio management will also be required. with the zoning ordinance. Review and n and sediment control and storm water PART III STAFF CONCLUSIONS The recent history of this portion of Peters Creek Road corridor indicates some degree of transition from residential to commercial, especially on the south side of the road in the City of Roanoke. Although this fact runs against the grain of the Comprehensive Plan, land use and traffic impacts are expected to be manageable. Staff suggests the following conditions be proffered: 1) No disabled vehicles will be parked outdoors overnight; and 2) Operating hours of the minor automobile repair facility will be restricted to Monday through Friday from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. • S-~ ClIl1%C Quailty Import Car Service To: Roanoke County Planning Dept. From: Marc Wilson Re: Proffered condition for rezoning request; tax map number 37.14-1-6 Date: September 3, 1997 We proffer as a condition for rezoning the above referenced property from R-1 to C-2 that no junk .cars will be stored outside. Marc Wilson Rezoning applicant J- to erty o °ner G~~ . ~ Imogene ~ingate Property owner ~~~~ 3345 North Franklin Street 5153 Peters Creek Road Christiansburg, VA 24073 ~ Roanoke, Virginia 24019 (730) 382-1133 FAX (703) 382-1470 (703) 563-1133 -- 08/29/1997 01:07 540-776-3117 CAMPBELL CONSTPUCT PAGE 02 S-~ • ~~ ~.,/ - ~ , CAMPBELL CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT CO..1NC. ~ 4524 Old Cave Spring Rd. Roanoke, VA 24018 ~~ ~ A,, ~~ .. • SITE PLAN ~ SPORTS CAR CLINIC P E T E ~ 5 CREEK R O A D COUN~1-Y OF f~OANOI~E DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 5204 Bernard Or.•. P.O. BOX 29800 Roanoke, VA 21018 (.540` 772-2osa FAx t54o ~ 772-z t o8 7~e ~~~z 7/Zs ""~ l yzg For sta/l use only rlatc rccci cd:" rr_ i •ed by-~ ~ 22 q ~ application r PC/8Zr1 da;-: plat rd issued: ~ BOS ale: ~'~~~9~ ~---- 5~ P~ ~ 3 , 19 9 ~ Case Number /~ /J~ ;? ~: ~ i;:;::;?;;?;:;? ~: ~ i ~: ~::::: E: ~ E::: 7 Check type of application filed (aleck all that apply): ® REZONING ^ SPECIAL USE ^ VARIANCE ,Applicant's name: Pfarc I. Wilson Phone: 5G3-1133 (tf) (Address: 5001 Glenvar sleights Blvd. Zip Code: Salem, VA 24153 Phone: ~ Owner's name: Joe D. ~ Imogene YJingate 98G-0472 (ld) Address: G854 Campbell Drive Zip Code: Salem, VA 24153 location of propert , Tax iVtap Number: ~ ~ 7,/y -/-( Peters Creek Road ~~ -~~ '-""'~:' Magisterial District: .Catawba Roanoke, VA 24019 Community Planning Area: Peters Creel: Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: R-1 O.GS ~ ~' acres Existing Land Use: Vacant sq.ft. ...... Proposed Zoning: C-2 For Sra/f Use Cn;y Proposed Land Use: Automotive Service, 1•iinor Use Type: I11SUraI1Ce A~e11C}r Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of-the requested district? YES X NO IF ~JO, A VAnI,^-~~ 1CE IS REQUIRED FIRS~i'. Dves the parcel meet the minimum criteria for t. ~__ requested Use Type? YES X NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED F=IRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being pref.=r.d with this request? YES NO X Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in er~_r to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF A~JY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOfv1PLETE. ws v wi v ws v Consultation ~ 8 1/2" x 11" concept plan Application fee Application -~?s tiletes and bounds description ~~>?' Proffers, if applicable >., Justification w, Water and sewer application Adjoining property o~~ners l hereby certify that / am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser ar•,d am acting with the knowledge and consent o/ the owner. ~~ Fv~ S(aN Use Only: Casc Nurtiber pplicant Mr. Marc Wilson The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the follo~~:ing questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. The intended uses proposed by Mr. Wilson are well-established and respected businesses already located in Roanoke City on Peters Creek Road within half mile of this site. Their customer base covers the entire Roanoke Valley and beyond. The ability of this customer base to locate and have simple access is crucial. It is Mr. Wilson's intent to provide an aesthetically pleasing site development with safe and convenient access having minimal impact on surrounding properties. Driveways are planned to minimize impact on Peters Creek Road. Rezoning of lot #6 to C-2 will provide the necessary azea needed to prevent overcrowding of the site. ase explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanok=_ County mprehensive Plan. Lot #7 (currently zoned C-2) will be developed as an automotive service facility known as The Sportscar Clinic. As shown on the concept plan, the rezoning of lot #6 to C-2 will allow Mr. Wilson to develop this site in an uncrowded and attractive fashion, utilizing the existing topography to greatest advantage. The office building provides an effective and attractive transition from lot #7 to the residential site behind lot #6. This area of Roanoke County has been in a steady state of transition from residential to commercial for several years. This development proposal follows this trend in_ an orderly and pleasing way with a positive, minimal impact on the surrounding community. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrcunding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. i • I This development plan takes fullest advantage of the site's existing topography. Simple and safe flow of traffic is provided by locating the entrances and exits as far from the corner as possible. Adequate public utilities are already available to the site. Intended uses are quality, clean, and upscale businesses with hours of operation Monday through ~ - ', Friday, from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.. No weekend, holiday or evening activities aze intended. SportsG s • Cl~n~c Quality Import Car Service To whom it may concern: The intent of this plan is to locate my already established business from its rented location at 5153 Peters Creek Road to 3328 Peters Creek Road. As founder and president of AMS, Inc., tla The Sportscar Clinic, I have, for 22 years strived to project the image of quality and professionalism in my business. Seven years ago, we took one of the ugliest sites on Peters Creek Road and developed it into Roanoke's most respected independent automotive service facility. Unfortunately this is rented property with limited possibilities for the image I wish to project. Five years ago, I bought a retail carpet store along Montgomery County's busiest corridor and developed it into a service facility that breaks the mold of the average repair shop. Please see the enclosed newsletter for more information about my business. My intent is to do even better with this development. The proposed office building will house my father-in-law's businesses, an insurance agency and travel agency. He has been well established on Peters Creek Road for over 13 years. Thank you for your attention to this request. <~ Marc Wilson 3345 North Franklin Street _~ Christiansburg, VA 24073 (730) 382-1133 FAX (703) 382-1470 s-~ 5153 Peters Creek Road Roanoke, Virginia 24019 (703) 563-1133 . . fiEEN~ti~ = ~ I a~~~4~~ C~~• • DP ~ 1,AFA~ ' 04 ~a ROANOKE ` c~~c7T ' s w°S~ • 47 AOM~NISTRAilO~N tw'~t / • `rr= p` ~~L GIEN \ ~ 53 COVE \~' G \ 780 qgN OR~.O Doa :d`~ +~ o~~. \ ~ 0 17 r 4927 .~ 4~ss ~' \ ~ D r. R \ ~_ ~- P/0 37.p-I-22 I'• 100' .W/,o>r ~7p/ifs CAvirA DEPAF:TME~i'I' OF PLA.NNIh'G AND ZONING . MARC I~. WILSON R-1 to C-2 37.14-1-6 ° <T g 'ra w~ Koa • ~ o ' sr"°ou r ~o r+ ; c ,r~'~&.o~f~G)R~}{ LAKE( viw `c~„ 'n '"" `.•°u:':\ ..i \/~~ G 1 •< i '.T SVpEAe AAtf +. ~`. f' \ia 7A ~'~. ~ ~~ i `, o c wor0. 0 N~~q{ l~,~ .~,~or~k ~ .. ~ , ~. ~ s arnt"oust ~`~ C `t.ao \ ~ .-. NOQTM~Uk[•J'1`p0. :~ ~1 `. M~PO 9 O ~ f "fl ~ .~ WTCt ,. \ , WI~IEDAI f ~ ~ 9 Y + ~ :' yo O f. ;. ~ _ ~`yq' ~` fl _t "'10~~`Yy 6`: •I ` ~ 1~9p ~ O` `• ~~1 ~Cf 1 DR N• 1~ O- ~~3. ci0 1 Of ~'F OR ~' P> . (i r ~.C~ Y. ..~P 51 ~\~• ~~: f9 _ ~J 9 AEI b29p. H\.~l""~~. `rr ARROW v r ~:. •!' , ~ ~ s ~ b11Ll~R ~R7 2~~ , PF;,,, ~, • ~ , ~~~ ~~~ _ ~~ ~~ \ ~~ ~~ ~_ ~~~ t ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 1997 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 0.65-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED 130 FEET NORTHWEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF PETERS CREEK ROAD AND NORTHRIDGE LANE (TAX MAP NO. 37.14-1-6) IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF MARC I. WILSON WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on August 19, 1997, and the second reading and public hearing were held September 23, 1997; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on September 2, 1997; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 0.65 acres, as described herein, and located 130 feet northwest of the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northridge Lane (Tax Map Number 37.14-1-6) in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-1, Low Density Residential District, to the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of MARC I. C:\OFFICE\WPWIN\WPDOCS\AGENDA\ZONING\WILSON.RZN 1 ~~ WILSON. 3. That the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts: (1) No junk vehicles will be stored outside. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the west side of Northridge Drive, said point being the southeasterly corner of the Dallas R. Keith property and the northeasterly corner of the Mattie E. James property; thence, with a line between the Dallas R. Keith and the Mattie E. James property, S. 78° 50' W. 274.1 feet to an old iron on the line of the Charlie Myers property; thence, with a line between the Charlie Myers property and the Mattie E. James property, S. 12° 00' E. 119.15 feet to an iron; thence, with a new line through the Mattie E. James property, N. 72° 00' E. 92.73 feet to an old axle, being a corner to the R.E. Lee property; thence, with a line between the R.E. Lee property and the Mattie E. James property, N. 70° 49' 30" E. 198.53 feet to an old iron on the west side of Northridge Drive; thence with the west side of Northridge Drive, N. 22° 32' W. 82.08 feet to the BEGINNING, and containing 0.65 acre, and being further described as Tax Map No. 37.14-1-6. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. C:\OFFICE\WPWIN\WPDOCS\AGENDA\ZONING\WILSON.RZN 2 s-~ f AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 1997 ORDINANCE 092397-15 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF APPROXIMATELY 22.01 ACRES OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF FINNEY DRIVE AND ELIZABETH DRIVE (TAX MAP NOS. 71.10-1-8 AND 71.10-2-70) IN THE VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS OF AG-3 AND R-1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1 UPON THE APPLICATION OF F. W. FINNEY CONSTRUCTION CORP. WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on August 19, 1997, and the second reading and public hearing were held September 23, 1997; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on September 2, 1997; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing approximately 22.01 acres, as described herein, and located at the intersection of Finney Drive and Elizabeth Drive (Tax Map Numbers 71.10-1-8 and 71.10-2-70) in the Vinton Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classifications of AG-3, Agriculture/Rural Preserve District, and R-l, Low Density Residential District, to the zoning classification of R-1, Low Density Residential District. 1 2. That this action is taken upon the application of F. W. Finney Construction Corp. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Tax Map No. 71.10-1-8 Beginning at a point on Niagra Road, thence in a southeasterly direction 805 feet, more or less, to a point on the southerly side of an existing 10 foot road as shown on plat of conveyance to Noah Settles, dated July 24, 1975, thence S. 1° 46' 18" W. 256.25 feet, more or less, to the actual place of beginning, thence S. 86° 50' E. 423.26 feet to a 24" maple; thence S. 43° 30' E. 287.95 feet to a set iron; thence S. 23° O1' 30" W. 375 feet to a set iron in black oak stump, thence N. 58° 48' 10" E. 127.84 feet to a point; thence N. 1° 46' 18" E. 200.31 feet to a point, the actual place of Beginning and containing 9.44 acres, more or less. Tax Map No. 71.10-2-70 Beginning at a point being the southwest corner of Lot 20, as shown on the "Plat of River Ridge" being recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County in Plat Book 11, page 2; thence N. 75° 27' 29" W. 279.88 feet to a point; thence N. 73° 52' 29" W. 156.80 feet to a point; thence N. 61° 54' 29" W. 136.20 feet to a point; thence N. 39° 55' 29" W. 151.30 feet to a point; thence N. 20° 23' 29" W. 123.50 feet to a point; thence N. 44° 50' 31" E. 243.80 feet to a point; thence N. 23° 02' 59" E. 727.15 feet to an iron pin; thence with the outer boundary of Section 3, Montgomery Village, being recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 7, page 76, S. 84° 47' 36" E. 402.15 feet to a point; thence with a curve to the left with a radius of 383.47 feet, an arc length of 119.65 feet, a chord bearing of S. 3° 05' 54" W., and a chord distance of 119.16 feet to a point; thence with a curve to the right with a radius of 25.00 feet, an arc length of 44.08 feet, a chord bearing of S. 44° 41' 00" W., and a chord distance of 38.59 feet to a point; thence with the outer boundary of the aforementioned "Plat of River Ridge" for the following seven courses: S. 5° 12' 24" W. 50 feet, N. 84° 47' 36" W. 71.36 feet, S. 10° 03' 44" W. 815 feet, S. 76° 06' 40" E. 108.57 feet, S. 13° 53' 20" W. 50 feet, S. 76° 06' 40" E. 11.46 feet, and S. 13° 53' 20" W. 150 feet to the Place of Beginning and containing 13.480 acres, more or less. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect 2 thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTS: Yyta~. ~. Cu~~ Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board cc: File Arnold Covey, Engineering and Inspection Terry Harrington, Planning and Zoning John Birckhead, Real Estate Assessments Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 3 r ~ ^ ~J PETITIONER: F.W. FINNEI( CONSTRUCTION CO. o CASE NUMBER: 33-9/97 Planning Commission Hearing Date: September 2, 1997 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: September 23, 1997 A. REQUEST Petition of F. W. Finney Construction Corp. to rezone approximately 22.01 acres from AG-3 & R-1 to R-1 to develop single family residences, located at the intersection of Finney Drive and Elizabeth Drive, Vinton Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS Five residents of Montgomery Village requested that no action be taken on the rezoning until drainage and erosion problems are corrected. Stan McKee presented a letter from the County's Engineering Department stating that staff was aware of the situation and that during recent reviews of proposed development plans, the developer was informed that the situation shall be resolved prior to plan approval. Mr. McKee also presented photographs of drainage problems and erosion damage in their neighborhood. He said that heavy rains have caused flooding in the past; however, a recently installed silt fence and water diversion ditch have helped to alleviate the problem. Mr. McKee pointed out that he has no objection to Mr. Finney's development but he wants the neighborhood's problems corrected first. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION In response to the Commission, Mr. Finney stated that the first section of development will consist of about 15 lots; the average lot will have about 100 feet of road frontage. The second section will be about the same size. Mr. Finney also stated that during development of Section 9, the slope which is causing problems for Finney Drive residents will be stabilized. The Commission requested that engineering staff be available at the Board of Supervisors meeting on September 23 to address the citizens' concerns about drainage and erosion control. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS None. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Robinson moved to recommend approval of the petition. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Robinson, Hooker, Witt, Ross NAYS: Thomason ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE Mr. Thomason said that the sediment and erosion problems need to be addressed prior to further development. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report Other -~~ ~ ~ , ~~ ~- Terrance Harri on, Secre Roanoke Co ty Plannin ommission TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: County of Roanoke ~, Department of Planning and Zoning Memorandum Planning Commission David Holladay September 2, 1997 Sg Petition by F.W. Finney Construction Corporation to rezone approximately 22.01 acres from AG3 and Rl to R1 This is an unconditional request to rezone approximately 22.01 acres from AG3 and R1 to Rl to develop single family residences. The request is needed to correct an error in the official zoning maps which occurred during the 1992 comprehensive rezoning of Roanoke County. The request is consistent with the policies and guidelines of the Development land use designation of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. Prior to 1992, the petitioner's two tracts, tax parcel numbers 71.10-1-8 and 71.10-2-70 were zoned RE Residential Estates. Surrounding properties were also zoned RE. When the RE zoning district was eliminated in 1992, some parcels which were previously zoned RE were rezoned to Rl Residential. Other parcels were rezoned to AG3 or AG1, Agricultural Rural district, depending upon existing and anticipated land uses, and the direction of the Comprehensive Plan. The official zoning maps for Roanoke County are drawn on tax parcel identification maps. The maps cover the entire county, and are indexed on a grid system. Along the edges of the maps, some larger parcels have portions which are shown on adjacent tax maps. The petitioner's two parcels and their acreage are identified on tax map #71.10, but only the northern portions of the parcels are shown. The southern portions are shown on map #71.14, with references that the tracts are portions of property on map #71.10. When the official zoning map for tax map #71.10 was amended, the northern half of the petitioner's two tracts were designated R1, which was consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and with existing and planned future sections of the Montgomery Village subdivision. On map #71.14, the southern half of the petitioner's two tracts were designated AG3, which created a zoning district boundary along a page break in the tax maps rather than along property lines. This error was discovered when plans were submitted to develop Section 9 of Montgomery Village. At that time, the petitioner was informed that the property would need to be rezoned in order to proceed with the development. A concept plan was submitted by the petitioner on 8/27/97. The plan shows existing Section 8, proposed Section 9, and a future section of Montgomery Village. The site slopes up to the north and northwest from the existing development. Preliminary site work was done in the past. Many of the S• $ trees have been removed- from the home sites, and some preliminary grading was done for the street serving proposed Section 9. Access will be from an extension of Elizabeth Drive. Public water and sanitary sewer services will be provided by the Town of Vinton. Adjacent property to the west is zoned R1 and is undeveloped. Adjacent property to the north is zoned Rl. The petitioner has submitted plans to develop the property to the north for single family residences. The proposed 10.85-acre Fox Meadow subdivision would be served by an extension of Parker Lane. Adjacent property to the east is zoned R1 and was developed as Section 8 of Montgomery Village, or the River Ridge Subdivision. Adjacent property to the south is zoned AG3 and is owned by the National Park Service. This land was acquired from the Town of Vinton, and provides a significant buffer area for the Roanoke River viewshed. The River Ridge, and Fox Fire sections of Montgomery Village are directly adjacent to the Blue Ridge Parkway. A few of the homes in those sections are barely visible to a viewer standing on the Roanoke River bridge. The two tracts proposed for rezoning are separated from the Parkway by either the buffer tract owned by the National Park Service, and by existing sections of Montgomery Village. No impacts to the Parkway are anticipated from the proposed development as a result of this rezoning request. The petitioner's request to rezone approximately 22.01 acres from AG3 and R1 to R1 is made in order to correct a mapping error. The request is consistent with the Development land use designation of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends approval of the request. • •' ,~-_` '~ fU ~1J~~ =cCT10N • ;,PFRUXIf~;AT l ` ~ r ~~ _~ 1, --' - ~ \\ -- -- ~ a t ~ 1 r -F--_.~.~_i7 ~ 1 ,_I ~ -i f it ''1 ^ I :iii I r t I J~ ---'_--~-'1 I' -EXIiT~1 ! n I Ir -~I I '~ ,7--. __`--~JI it r~ _ I. _ _ ~ ~ L~ it I. iy =~r__+~ ~IJ ) - - - - I s '~ ~ ;I j( di -- ~ r -L-~~ r • 1 r`- ~ ~ _i ' -- ~_ '! ~ r i _.~1.._~ ~I ;. ,,I r ~---- ---i4. '~ i ~~ , r r i "~,s~~. ``` - G SCC TiCN 8 F'RUPUSE~ SECTION 9 ~~ ~0 ~~ 5 TOTAL P.02 • COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 5204 Bernard ter. P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (540` 772-2os8 FAx c54o ~ 772-2 t o8 c~d~ -7lZpJ42~- For staff use oh/v date received:' ' received by. ° ~ s 9 7 Z~ application fee: PC/B A date: z /9~ placards iss ed: C BOS fate: Ps ~ f y/-~~ X97 Case Number: ~ ~ ~~ ~ • Check type of application filed (check all that apply): l ^VARIANCE ® REZONING ^ SPECIAL USE Applicant's name: F. W. Finney Construction Corp. Phone• ~~~ Address: 225 Lee Avenue, Vinton, Virginia j ~ Zip de:)2L ~ ?c Owner's name: F. W. Finney Construction Corp. ~ ~ ~~~ Phone Address: 225 Lee Avenue, Vinton, Virginia Zip Code: 2L1!^y Location of property: Tax Map Number: 1.10-1-8• ~ 71.10-2- 0 ` Magisterial District: Vinton bdivision Vill S M t age u on gomery Intersection Finney Dr. & Elizabeth ~ ommunity Planning Area: ~l,`j_~-~,~) Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: AC ~ ~ ~',~ ~ 10+ acres Existing Land Use: lir.~-:~~roved `~'~ col sq.ft. ~ r Proposed Zoning: R-1 For Staff Use Oniy Proposed Land Use:Development as resi ce:~rial housing-single family Use Type: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES X NO IF N0, A VAnIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES X NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being prer~rec with this request? YES NO X Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zonin g Ordinance in crc~r to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v ws ~ v ws v Consultation 8 1 /2" x 1 1 " concept plan Application fee Application ~~;<~' Metes and bounds description "«< Proffers, if applicable °i" Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners Justification 'K^:%" l hereby certify that l am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the know/edge and consent of the owner. F~'.W. e ruction Corp ~ W Finne President Owner's Signature: gy^r~ _ !~z o~ Y' P .' ~ CRANWELL MOORE ATTCFNEYS-AT-LAW • POST OFFICE BOX t tBOa. ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 2x022-t80a TELEPHONE (Sa0) 3x4.1000 FACSUtLc (Sa0) 3aa-7073 July 25, 1997 DELIVERED BY HAND Mr. Terry Harrington County of Roanoke Dept. Of Planning and Zoning 5204 Bernard Dr. P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Re: F. W. Finney Construction Corp. --Proposed Rezoning of Portions of Tas Map Nos. 71.10-1-8 and 71.10-2-70 S~ Dear Mr. Harrington: Enclosed with this letter please find an application, submitted on behalf of F. W. Finney Construction Corp. (Finney), to have the above referenced parcels of land rezoned from AG-3 to R-1 classification. The application has been completed according to the instructions you provided during our consultation Wednesday, July 23, 1997. This letter, in addition to serving as an introduction, is intended to fulfill the justification requirement of the application. Parcel 71.10-2-70 is a portion of a 180+ acre tract Finney purchased in 1970 from T. `~'. Muse. At the time of the purchase, the property was zoned for agricultural use and the county rezoned the entire tract for residential use. Finney proceeded systematically to develop the tract under the name of Montgomery Village Subdivision. On January 10, 1979, Finney acquired the 9.44 acre parcel, # 71.10-1-8, from Walter Ballard Settles. The most recent phase of development, Montgomery Village, Section 8, also known as River Ridge, was approved by the County on August 9, 1988. During the county's review of the Section 8 development, plans for the future development of the remaining property were discussed. Specifically, the county required Finney to enlarge the storm water drainage and retention features of Section 8, to accommodate the volume of storm water runoff anticipated once Sections 9 and 10 were also completed. Finney, having discussed its development plans with the county in great detail during the review process for Section 8, believed that incorporation of the storm water drainage requirements of its • anticipated projects into the approved plans for Section 8 represented a tacit understanding between the county and itself as to those anticipated projects. LAW OFFICES 111 VIRGINIA AVENUE WEST. VINTON. VIRGINIA 24179 S 8' Mr. Terry Harrington July 25, ~ 1997 Page 2 The subject property had been zoned for residential use ever since it was purchased, and Finney, in ongoing consultation with the County, had continuously developed the property in a manner consistent with that zoning classification. Finney, therefore, reasonably expected that the remaining parcels would not be considered for rezoning. In 1992, however, the County developed and implemented a comprehensive rezoning plan pursuant to which nearly half of Finney's remaining property vas reclassified AG-3, apparently as the result of the rezoning line having been drawn to correspond to a break in the tax map. Because of the comprehensive nature of the rezoning, individual landowners were not given notice that their land would be effected by the changes, and Finney, relying on previous discussions with the County, recorded no objection to the comprehensive rezoning plan. On June 19, 1997, Finney submitted its plans for development of Montgomery Village, Section 9, to the County Department of Engineering and Inspection. During the County's review, the disparity in zoning was brought to Finney's attention for the first time. As the result, Finney is submitting this application to correct what Finney believes was a mistake in the comprehensive plan, which changed the zoning of its property in such a fashion as to completely prevent the use it has always intended. The mistaken characterization, it appears, was based on a break in the tax map, rather than on an on-the-ground assessment of the appropriate use of the • subject property. Not only was Finney unaware of the change, during the period since the rezoning Finney has continued to pay taxes on the property at the higher residential tax rate, which is how the County has taxed the property because part of it remained zoned as R-1. This. despite the fact that the AG-3 zoning makes it impossible to develop the remaining portions as residential property. In light of the problem which has arisen with respect to the zoning of subject propem~, Finney has thoroughly reviewed its plans, to determine whether there might be any legitimate basis for the AG-3 classification. It is Finney's position that there will be no negative impact to surrounding property owners or to county resources as the result of the requested rezoning, and that the change in 1992 was made by mistake. For these reasons Finney asks that the Planning and Zoning Staff recommend approval of this application to the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors at the earliest possible opportunity. We understand that your department accepts the development plans, previously submitted by Finney, as the concept plan required by the County application for rezoning; and, that it will not be necessary for Finney to submit a separate water and sewer application and planimetric maps. You also indicated the list of adjoining property owners will be drawn from your offices files, and that the application fee will be waived. The development plans contain metes and bounds references for description of the portion of the subject property currently under review for development. We do not have a separate description in paragraph form; however, if S-g Mr. Terry Harrington July 25, 1997 Page 3 one is needed, we will see if we can develop one. With respect to the 9.44 acre parcel, intended for development as Section 10, a despcription is enclosed. Please let us know if there is anything else you require for this application to be considered complete. Otherwise, we look forward to receiving the notices for appropriate posting. Very truly yours, CRANWELL & MOO By: Kevin L. Pearson Enclosure cc: F. W. Finney • e M+ ~~01, ~/~ .~ 0'~} ~ NuSt _ ~..~% 7R.tll'ER!PnR>< MOfORr D /.v m~\ ~ ~~ I.BBEY~ =V~•` ".~.'.c ,- ~ ~~ ~ ! i ~~~~> o IV1 ~py r a ~dA~Q'~' 1/ _ ,~ 'n t ~ ~ ~-~ .'.lo- ~pv v.R ;~R'~~ = bIL1PGE ~ LJ29 ~ I • NOIIM C j ~~ pHE PAV ~~~~ .I~,GYI ~7rt~~_ ~, ~.i; ;dA . ~~. ~ RivER ~ _ ^~ pY~ /: ~~ R1pC"c U ~ ~q\F< o I ~`~ P INI~ A E.YPCOR£ I m'~O '• P vIAG ~1 1 / eolS~or iION~E PARK ~.za 3 J.29 •e 6 ~ ~~ ~.w ..' r,~' \ R-1 f ~~/, S- G D ~+. NORTH '+.+ . ~+ • X13 . I,,. !06) n~4. } _S+ T ar.n (ory w 6d n . ~ `~L ~ +eu I~ , L.zY ' S ,S ~ O 6S f O ' , i ~ Z` ;A i~ ~ . 9 •.. µ II '~ ~ _ S ~ ~ pI~ bry ~ s~; ~ , _ r~ e ~~~ s.w .e \~~ _ ~" DEPARZ'I~NT OF PLANNII~'G AND ZONING ,~ .,, • o v „y SIC ~'y• 13 Rro Y+ ..ei ~ .. ~iis 4 l2• D ~ ~~y a nu ti •+. c ~ nrr ' n. ~ 56 >; +. 14 ••~~ Gr' 1071 (, ,.,~ _ _ _ .,.. a t y zs s ~ 3 2 ' 39 ' ~- le ; zi ~ ,. =-Ise. ~ ;:2 I~+' • I .~I4. ' 20 !2 ? r , u~ ~ IT lJ~ 9y ' 18 ~t tc'j ~E1~aar^r ~• ,~~ ft t • ~~~ , r~~ ~~ ~ ~ . O A~-3 ~, ~~ ~n~ 4..M S.r.n 1 ~w Kr ' / F,W. FINNEY CONSTRUCTION CORP. AG-3 TO R-1 P/0 71,10-1-3 & P/0 71.10-2-70 /I . ,~ ". AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 1997 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF APPROXIMATELY 22.01 ACRES OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF FINNEY DRIVE AND ELIZABETH DRIVE (TAX MAP NOS. 71.10-1-8 AND 71.10-2-70) IN THE VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS OF AG-3 AND R-1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1 UPON THE APPLICATION OF F. W. FINNEY CONSTRUCTION CORP. WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on August 19, 1997, and the second reading and public hearing were held September 23, 1997; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on September 2, 1997; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing approximately 22.01 acres, as described herein, and located at the intersection of Finney Drive and Elizabeth Drive (Tax Map Numbers 71.10-1-8 and 71.10-2-70) in the Vinton Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classifications of AG-3, Agriculture/Rural Preserve District, and R-1, Low Density Residential District, to the zoning classification of R-1, Low Density Residential District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of F. W. Finney C:\OFFICE\WPWIN\WPDOCS\AGENDA\ZONING\FINNEY.RZN 1 ~." P Construction Corp. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Tax Map No. 71.10-1-8 Beginning at a point on Niagra Road, thence in a southeasterly direction 805 feet, more or less, to a point on the southerly side of an existing 10 foot road as shown on plat of conveyance to Noah Settles, dated July 24, 1975, thence S. 1° 46' 18" W. 256.25 feet, more or less, to the actual place of beginning, thence S. 86° 50' E. 423.26 feet to a 24" maple; thence S. 43° 30' E. 287.95 feet to a set iron; thence S. 23° O1' 30" W. 375 feet to a set iron in black oak stump, thence N. 58° 48' 10" E. 127.84 feet to a point; thence N. 1° 46' 18" E. 200.31 feet to a point, the actual place of Beginning and containing 9.44 acres, more or less. Tax Map No. 71.10-2-70 Beginning at a point being the southwest corner of Lot 20, as shown on the "Plat of River Ridge" being recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County in Plat Book 11, page 2; thence N. 75° 27' 29" W. 279.88 feet to a point; thence N. 73° 52' 29" W. 156.80 feet to a point; thence N. 61° 54' 29" W. 136.20 feet to a point; thence N. 39° 55' 29" W. 151.30 feet to a point; thence N. 20° 23' 29" W. 123.50 feet to a point; thence N. 44° 50' 31" E. 243.80 feet to a point; thence N. 23° 02' 59" E. 727.15 feet to an iron pin; thence with the outer boundary of Section 3, Montgomery Village, being recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 7, page 76, S. 84° 47' 36" E. 402.15 feet to a point; thence with a curve to the left with a radius of 383.47 feet, an arc length of 119.65 feet, a chord bearing of S. 3° 05' S4" W., and a chord distance of 119.16 feet to a point; thence with a curve to the right with a radius of 25.00 feet, an arc length of 44.08 feet, a chord bearing of S. 44° 41' 00" W., and a chord distance of 38.59 feet to a point; thence with the outer boundary of the aforementioned "Plat of River Ridge" for the following seven courses: S. 5° 12' 24" W. 50 feet, N. 84° 47' 36" W. 71.36 feet, S. 10° 03' 44" W. 815 feet, S. 76° 06' 40" E. 108.57 feet, S. 13° 53' 20" W. 50 feet, S. 76° 06' 40" E. 11.46 feet, and S. 13° 53' 20" W. 150 feet to the Place of Beginning and containing 13.480 acres, more or less. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby C:\OFFICE\WPWIN\WPDOCS\AGENDA\ZONING\FINNEY.RZN 2 S- ~ are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. C:\OFFICE\WPWIN\WPDOCS\AGENDA\ZONING\FINNEY.RZN 3 ~illilllllillillllllililllillilllllliillllllllllilliililllllllllillllllllllllllilllllilllliillillllllilllllillllllllll1111111111111J ~.. - _ - ,- AGENDA ITEM NO. ..,.. ._ ,_ APPE CE REQUEST _ -_ ;__ ~~ /PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS ° ° __ -_ v-~v "" ° '_ SUBJECT: , ~/~~ u d like the Chairman of the Board of Su ervisors to reco nize me durin the Iwo 1 p g g _ meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. ,, _ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND' ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED ° _= BELOW: ° -_ ^ Each s Baker will be iven between three to five minutes to comment whethe r speaking as ari individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to ,_ . _. ~"' do otherwise. ° ~s ~ ~~ ~ i ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ~. ° -. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized e speaker and audience members is not allowed. _. _ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at aI~ times. .- ^ Speakers are requested to leave .any written statements and/or comments ° with the clerk. s ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP -' SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. ° .- °_ _ i ~ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK v ~'~ ~~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~. ~ ~~ i i ~~ ~~ ° ~~ ° ~~ O ~~ ~ ~IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIilllililllllilllllilllllilllllilllllllllllliillllllilllllilllllllllltiil1111111111111111111111111111ilfilllllm Uiililllllllilllliilllll111111111111111Illilllllliilillllllllllllllilll I11111l111111111111111111111IIIlllllillillillllllllllilll~ s ~ ~. 4 ~ v -~ ~~ ~. ~ ~~ ~_ ~~ w AGENDA ITEM NO. _ APPEARANCE REQUEST ~_ __ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS s v SUBJECT: ~~,(~. ~in~oV~~J ~'C~Zo,~//~/C~ ~~E' i i r'i~o,~ .. q ~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. s WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GNE MY NAME AND ADDRESS o FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY~ THE GUIDELINES LISTED .= BELOW: r s ~ ~ ~ ~~ s a. ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment c =~ whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will ,= .= decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ot~the Board to do otherwise. . -.. ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. -- ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ,® ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to Leave any written statements and/or comments c with the clerk. "' m .=. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP c ,= SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT' THEM. ~_ ..... ` a PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK i ~~ ~~ ~. l~v ~ ~~ ~ ~1 _ 1~ s ~ ~ _ ~ - ~ u.. IIIli1111111t11111111111111111111111111111111Illillllllllillllllll1111111111l1illllilillllillllllllllllllllillll111111111111111Im s-g Finney Drive Residents Opposed to Rezoning Until Erosion Problem Is Solved Mr. and Mrs Steve Ellis 1112 Finney Drive Mr. and Mrs. David Cash 1118 Finney Drive Mr. and Mrs. Ed Roach 1124 Finney Drive Mr. and Mrs. Stan McKee 1130 Finney Drive Mr. and Mrs. Terry Payne 1136 Finney Drive Mr. and Mrs. John Hehns 1142 Finney Drive Mr. and Mrs. Tony Allie 1148 Finney Drive Mr. and Mrs. Matthew Fleisher 1160 Finney Drive F ~ ~~ YL A. _S~ _~ f ~ ~... r a: This picture is looking down on the home of Mr. and Mrs. Ed Roach of 1124 Finney Drive. The Roach's had mulched the property owned by Finney Construction to prevent the erosion from washing into their yard. They had also tried to plant wild-flowers which washed away. This picture is looking down at the property of Mr. and Mrs. Stan McKee at 1130 Finney Drive. The McKee's had tilled half the hill on the Finney property and planted grass. Also, they have purchased 60 bails of straw in an attempt prevent the erosion from washing on their property. Both rows of hay have washed away. This picture is looking down on the property of Mr. and Mrs. Terry Payne at 1136 Finney Drive. The Payne's have purchased over 60 bails of straw in an attempt to prevent the erosion from washing onto their property. The silt fence was erected by Mr. Finney after the neighbors protested to the Roanoke County Dept. of Engineering and Inspection about the unauthorized development of the Finney property. c. ~. ~' This picture is looking down onto the property of Mr. and Mrs. Tony Allie at 1148 Finney Drive. The Allie's have used landscaping timbers and planted running junipers to prevent the erosion from washing onto their home. They have also constructed a stone wall. The silt fence was erected by Mr. Finney after the neighbors complained to the Roanoke County Department of Engineering and Inspection about the unauthorized development of the Finney Property. This is a picture looking down on the property of Mr. and Mrs. John Helms at 1142 Finney Drive. The Helm's have recently built a stone wall and tiered their property in an attempt to keep the erosion from washing down onto their home. The silt fence was erected by Mr. Finney after the neighbors complained to the Roanoke County Department of Engineering and Inspection about the unauthorized development of the Finney Property. This is a picture of the vacant lot at 1154 Finney Drive. The property is owned by Finney Construction. The erosion washes almost to the street in some places. It also washes onto the 1148 and 1160 Finney Drive properties. • _ _. .rr. +~ -' ,,,IRx z . _. !ate .. ._. - 4 .. _- T~==:.. yam, .. .r .... ~ =.+EF: _ - , :,~ tk~~-- Y . .:~ .:. ~ ~:~. ~`+ .~: This is a picture of the property behind the home of Mr. and Mrs. Matthew Fleisher. The Fleisher's moved into their home in May. Note the severity of the erosion from the Finney properties in just 3 months. .~....- , -.~,.: '_-',J f"~''"~i -.-.-~. iii .+' _ ~'~~ ,. t ~'' ~'qa',.= ,s t as 'k' R,u ~. n ~ .4 ~iF. X54 ' .~_- ~- -r f y Y - .... - ,- ~~4rw .} ^- '-. -- . r~r. ~. A ,:.°= w y - y _ -?. ,• ~L- 3 a ~- - +~..,fy-. - ,~ i '4 f .-a:".. '. '~ o _ . ,.. X.. y Straw row blacking further ~ erosion behind 1136 Finney Dr_. .:- -~ ~::-~-~= sue.:s~~ :~_ ..,~~~ ~ ~'.4a - °° ~~~ , ~:' • .{ f s #~=~ -fi.,.: '~ } :; ;~ ~ g , 5.-, .~--> :~ ~Y' ~ ~' ~~ .. t) This picture is looking up the hill from the intersection of Finney and Elizabeth at the unauthorized development Finney Construction has already started. There is presently a stop work notice on the property. Mr. Finney has been warned by the Roanoke County Dept. of Eng. and Inspection that any further development will cost him $1000 per day. ,,. _ _ ~. aM _ _~ Y ' _ ~ "~' ,. , This is a picture of the unauthorized development on the hill behind Finney Drive. Large amounts of earth have already been moved which will eventually wash down the hill without a permanent drainage solution. This is a picture of the unauthorized development on the hill behind Finney Drive. The road under development will run parallel to Finney Drive. Without a permanent drainage solution, this will cause additional drainage onto the Finney Drive property owners. Their homes are located to the right side of this picture, just down the hill. This picture is looking down the hill from the Finney property toward the Finney and Elizabeth intersection. Erosion from the hill washed down onto the houses on Elizabeth after a severe rain. The Dept. of Eng. and Inspections forced Mr. Finney to clean the intersection after several neighbors complained. Our Objective: To ensure the erosion problem behind Finney Drive is solved before any future development can begin. Our Request: *Please require Mr. Finney to post a bond for correcting the erosion problem. *Please require Mr. Finney to correct the erosion problem BEFORE any other development begins in the new subdivision. Other Concerns About New Development 1. There is only one entrance into Montgomery Village. This is the intersection at Finney Drive and Hardy Road. With several hundred homes, shouldn't there be another access road or, at least, a traffic light? 2. Finney Drive already provides access to the residents on Elizabeth and the streets connecting to Elizabeth. Could the new subdivision have another access other than the entrance Mr. Finney proposes? There are 10 children under the age of 8 who live on Finney Drive. Another 24 or more houses would add significantly to the traffic on this section of Finney Drive. A second entrance to the new subdivision would help reduce this potential problem. .• PETITIONER: ERNEST CLARK CASE NUMBER: 22-7/97 Planning Commission Hearing Date Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: July 1, 1997 September 23, 1997 S9 A. REQUEST Petition of Ernest Clark to rezone 9.77 acre from R-1 Conditional to R-1 to construct single family residences, located at the south side of Woodhaven Road, approximately 0.5 mile east of its intersection with Green Ridge Road, Catawba Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION Mr. Witt questioned if sewer and water were available to the property. Ms. Scheid said that it is. Mr. Robinson asked what the lot sizes would be. Mike Webb, representing the petitioner, said they would be 80-85 feet. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS 1) One 20-foot wide pedestrian easement is to be provided between the public roads system and the property of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors in a location acceptable to the developer and School Administrative staff that would be suitable for pedestrian and non-motorized traffic. Any and all improvements with this access shall be the responsibility of County. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Ms. Hooker moved that the Commission recommend approval of the rezoning request with proffered conditions. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Hooker, Robinson, Thomason, Witt NAYS: None ABSENT: Ross F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report Other ~, ` _-, Terrance Harr gton, S retary Roanoke unty Planning Commission S=~i 6821 Ardmore Drive Roanoke, VA 24019 July 3, 1997 Mr. Terry Harrington Director of Planning & Zoning County of Roanoke P.~. Bcx 29Q00 Roanoke, VA 24018 Re: Rezoning of Tax Parcels 37.05-1-1 and 37.05-1-2 Comm: 97-94 Dear Mr. Harrington: As agreed at the July 1, 1997 meeting of the Roanoke County Planning Commission, I, as owner, voluntary agree to the following as a condition of rezoning Tax Parcels 37.05-1-1 and 37.05-1-2: One twenty foot wide pedestrian easement is to be provided between the public roads system and the property of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors in a location acceptable to the developer and School Administrative staff that would be suitable for pedestrian and non- motorized traffic. Any and all improvements with this access shall be the responsibility of County. Please attach this proffered condition to my rezoning application for presentation to the Board of Supervisors on August 19, 1997. If you have any questions, please call. y truly yours, Ernes Clark EC:mgs Copy to: Mr. Brad Graham ., County of Roanoke Department of Planning and Zoning Memorandum T0: Planning Commission FROM: Jon Hartley DATE: June 19, 1997 RE: Request of Ernest Clark to rezone 9.77 acres from R-1 with conditions to R-1 to construct single family residences, located on the south side of Woodhaven Road, 0.5 mile east of its intersection with Green Ridge Road. The property in question was originally rezoned in April 1988 from R-1, Single Family Residential, to R-5, Residential to allow the construction of 70 townhouse units (35 duplex units) to be constructed on public roads. This proposal was approved by the Commission and Board with the following conditions. 1. Project will be in substantial conformity with the site plan of T. P. Parker & Son, submitted; 2. Streets will be developed in accordance with state standards and submitted for acceptance into state secondary system; 3. Units will be similar to design submitted; 4. A pedestrian footpath easement in at least two locations from the public streets within the subdivision to the adjoining school property will be shown on the recorded plat of development; and 5. Ten year storm detention will be provided with a two year storm release. The site plan submitted is attached as are copies of the submitted building designs. Since 1988, the property has remained undeveloped, although more detailed .plans were reviewed by the County. In 1992 the property was rezoned under the Comprehensive Countywide rezoning. To remain consistent with all of the surrounding areas, the property was changed back to R-1, but retained the right to develop townhouses under the conditions cited above. Since the concept plan was proffered as a condition, no other layout or scheme of development can be considered until the conditions are revised or removed. The owner is asking that all of the proffered conditions be removed in order to allow the development of 32 single family residences. Staff has reviewed conceptually the proposed development plan and inspected the site. Some of the issues addressed in the 1988 conditions are now handled administratively, including requirements for the design and construction of public roads, and construction of a storm water detention basin. Other conditions, such as the proffered layout or design, are not normally addressed in single family developments. Given these factors, removing the conditions would reduce the density of development, consistent with the surrounding area, and in turn reduce the overall impacts on roads and community facilities that the development of this property might have. The one existing condition staff would suggest retaining in some form is the requirement for pedestrian access between the public roads in the development and the school property to the south. Frequently properties which are adjacent to a school on a dead end street become an unofficial corridor for student foot and bicycle traffic during school session. Attempts to control this type of access has been somewhat controversial and problematic to the school administration. To meet what the staff and school administration perceive as a critical need, it is recommended that one pedestrian access easement be provided. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the proposed request be approved with the suggestion that the following statement be substituted as a condition: 1. One twenty foot wide pedestrian easement is to be provided between the public roads system and the property of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors in a location acceptable to the developer and School Administrative staff that would be suitable for pedestrian and non-motorized traffic. Any and all improvements associated with this access shall be the responsibility of County. i „4 °"Y ~~^_ S~~o I \ \pc~~ F O ~9r ~ 'O T U ~ j 4 - ~. ~ 5 ~--- 3 rho LL / N _~_ / ~ _.. ~ ' ~ _. i ~ - ~~ °~ ;~ s a- ~~ ~ [i o9° ~ G : F ° ~ N s d~ Y rrb~ 5? ~~_ ay~~ Mz ~' y a ~0 ~ «" 4 z ~~ A - m ~ . ~ y ^~ ,~ ~~ ~ a S ~ 1 _ W 1' ~ ~ i xy ~ - w~ ~~ ~ ~ _ ~ m -~ w ~ w, Z W W F Q ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~. ~N ~~~~ QJ Y ~ K •t 6 ~ ~ ~ ~ ` i~ W ~ t! i ! 2 C d ~ i ! O +~' V L ~ ~ 4 W _ _ F ~. YFp 'J 3 ~ ~~ 0 O n n n ' + ~, n I o i ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ Z i ' ~ u~ n r1 ~ivnn ynyn~ n ~, ° - ~ f v i` ~ I ~ 6 J ' I~ ~ ' O ~ p ~ Y 7f ' ~ O Q _ ~ 4 ~_..~~ °, ~~~i _~`- ~ivrn vNyuya~ - ~ r--1 ,-~ -- L , ~ ~~ -- i : II ,~--j, ~~ 3 -- 3 .J ~_ __ 1 `~ \ d ~ ] II b ~ ~ ~ .~---- o~ ~ a II II ~ >,sq~ Oy~a V Y~~3 N3iltrN ~ 4oCN _~~M A_ `o~ ~a 0 ~ }~A- 7 ~70~ `g~9 ~~~~ ~ ~. T 3 ~ -- ~ ~, -v r ~ , a .. x. .~ I "'~~r"~'t ' ,~~ ?fit? ~, l..ks' :~ '~-~''~ ~' .. r `.p a ~e ~, a cF[ ~= s ~+ 1 Y. -=. _ ~ r`~, s ~\(. ` +i ~ 1-' : ~ '" Y- .yam -. ,( y I_- ~ T~ .rte e ~^~ t~if, - n~M v a - . ~_. ~_;. ~~ i .tea- , r~ (_-- ~~- - ;,~ _. ~ ,: . ~w ;__ ,, 141' c,'~-s ~ ~--~ ~~. _$:_ : _ ~. •__}._3~~ ~~ ~ - - .. ~~ __ 1'' - ~, :R f_ _S~` r _ ` Kt.l- ~ 1!7 Y r 1 } Y y '• r' ~ y ~-. r - . - . ~f_ ..'r yam}-_,~. ,:~+~- `ti - ~ _ ~, 1 - :' lt - It ti ~, ~ : + 4 ~ ~ .Y -~ '. ~M .~I~ ~. r' .} ~.-. ~-. }~' k ~J q _~ *~ r?;. ~. y~ Y .. ~ti~ 7 iy {~ ~ .,L~~C ~ •. ' . y~ ',~ 7774 .;: r # ~ F ~ ~I ~ ti .. ~±~ ~ ~ ! 1 ~ • " ..-,x a r. tiii - r ti, .a . ,~, i?vr' ti7R -c.-~.' - -may-~~ - _ w~ .. • 1 .~E,. . _ •• ~ ~,~ ...., f f' - ~. ~-~ ,~ R. i. ~~i 7 ..-.~Y.' ~' ''~% . ~~~. '~"~^r' '~~' ism ~ , ~. ~ ~ ~Y _ _ t ~.. . ~ • - ~ },5-1 .. .> ~r ---------"-? x-C ~l ~. . ~ ~ (~ .~ ;'. t l v'~^" G:! v; , `J ~ ~ ~'~~~ ~' .' j^ Rt:. -- ~'" ^t y i '~' • ~ ~ _" r s j . - v "~ JY ~~..~. G ~.1 . - .ty ~,..E r Ltd({~ t - '~`~~` _ -~v~+~' - - _ - fly 'Y ~'t'r_ _ _ _ L t+i+~~. T' - ~`` ~` }~ ~ ~ f F t~ ~,~ ~ ~ tL ~. ~ `i y ~, ..: [~ . r L a4 YrS' / 1, Yt,(•`s ,=i,- •~ ~ ;y`~ a3i"~~- ~~rt, S`.. ,i :L ~: -~. ~.~ .r... _~, lTV.:-h;' 2 +?: / mil' . ~~' r t T ~ ! i':. j ~~ ems" .c. -~ -~.. ~~• '`= n ~=, ~{}fir .a ' r C ~7: lF~ - ~ -tom 1 ~`~"~`~,Y y ~` r _ - - ~~ ~ ?-` ~- r'n-. /5"4'u„~ ~~jP c-r~^_.+~~~.~:.~.!+~~ , _ ~''.L~ `M 5*-- 4 ~~ A ` roc-' ~y J~ J ~K t,r~~ ~~`.~`r~s.? _ fl:'~a"V~ '~ - _ #r :~ j?~-'~rLc, ~: ~«~.4~~. ~fi:Feyr,< -] a.r -C rs/ u~K~ y M ~ ri-.raa'+r!<'1 '4 ~-. 3 ".~ri f"-r-~n „~• ~ ~ =;~ i +. - _- k i c.. _ ;.}s. ~~. o t s iy iH`Y ~ ~' _-y- J - ,-L - 1 t ,i _") V _ 1 ~~%- 1 .,i.,.-w ^'^C?,.~.,.'SY ~s•Fxss~, cuBLi ,~ i' ,r.._ ~` ,~ .ti si K 4 _ r-r7 7 x'+ ~~ , `h.~ ` ~~"'~n'7' 3~- rk~ iv~x r'i J~ti Y 't, -~. T r i. ,` T ~~'{ "'~~ ;~ . j 1.4t) ~~~yy, ~~. J l~l ~~ Zti ' ~ J ~:. ~;~. .+;,~tii S tr' "r ~. ~ ~ ~ ~+, ~.~~ ~ i! ., r i « ~ I - 4~ ,r s= ~ - .. i ~ ~ may: ~ f ~' 4 i ~ _ ~,. ~. ,-~ Oi Y .~` ,. ~. .) /~ f u•~~ •~,GNsa y(_,~~ I .. ~ .e. ....y. ~~' '~ ~'' '- •+3 :-f - S_ _ <rr ~tiy ~ ::: :i: .:f _.~-" _.L _ Y` 4• :.~~ h` , j ,~ ~4~' ~ '~'s ii 'J.!• .. ••~~ 7 ~1 ~T ~~ 1!~, S('~• i ''(~'~E=i''~ L~ ~ ~'. I Z^~•~>~l`e~yy '~~k is L , 4 ^ ?~ l ~c , ~V ,r ~ / ~'~~ttf a - -~ = ,~ _ -c t7~ ~ J t!y ~ ~[ l° l !hi` Z .y 1. _; ...~ _ _, 4 r ~ '.+f~ f" ~tn ~• _C ~~ 1y t"r i+A+..~~ :s Sr- r s= •p 1 ~;. r - ~;;1'-` - S _- _ t - _ ~ f... ~z _^,_`~ ~~ .-Y ` K '~ y ~T ^~ t s a F.. r r a, ~ ..t, Y: _ .1 ~~• CT •' ~. YJ~ -L~..' ~~ - - _ _ For staf/ use ronly '~ "~ r date i received by~ applieatio e• PC/BZA date: /~~ , / placards issue ~r ~/z7~y7 BOS date: Case Numbcr: f Check type of application filed (check all that app1Y): ® REZONING ^ SPECIAL USE ^ VARIANCE Applicant's name: Ernest Clark Phone:563-5605 Address: 6821 Ardmore Drive Zip Code:2~019 Roanoke, VA Owner's name: Ernest Clark - Phone: 563-5605 Address: 6 8 21 Atmore Drive Zip Code: 2 ~ 019 Roanoke, VA Location of property: ~ South side of Tax Map Number: 37. OS-1-1 & 37.05-1-2 Woodhaven Road approximately on Magisterial District: Hollins halfmile east of its intersecti Community Planning Area: Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: R-1, Conditional 9 • 77 acres Existing Land Use: One single family home sq.ft. r- '•`-`-`-'- ~ .. ~.'3"~. - ..~ - --~. . f. Proposed Zoning: ; R-1 Foy Staff Use c::ry Proposed Land Use: Single Family Residential uS~Type: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, ~•~iCth, and frontage requirements of the requested cis;rict? YES x _ NO lF NO, A VA=I~.NCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria .or ;`~ requested Use Type? YES x NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being prc;'=-~~ with this request? YES NO Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in ar;:er to: Is the application complete? Please check if enc:csed. APPLICATION WILL NOT 8E ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMFL~ lI ~- ws v tvi v ws v X Consultation x 8 1 /2" x i i" concept plan Application fee x Application X ~f: Metes and hounds description Proffers, if applicable x Justification x ~~~~~ Water and sewer application x Adjoining property owners l hereby certify that l am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent of contract purchaser and am acting with the knowl~dQe and con gent of the owner. Owner's Signature: ~ ~ ~ / -\r~~ COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 5204 Bernard ter.- - P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 ( 540' 772-2068 FAX (540) 772-2108 ~,:o- foi Stall Use Only: Case Numbcr -r ~'"` ~~ :::;::::.l :::::::::::::::: ~:~ z .~ ~~. ~ ~ . . ~~~ T . ,?~!. . ~~.~~. ~. ~~~:~~f~ ~~~~.~~~~~ I ~. ,pplicant _ Ernest Clark i he Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need anc justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the fello~ving questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. 1. The rezoning reduces the density of~possible development on the property 2. The rezoning will reduce the amount of traffic and possible development on the property. ~3. The rezoning will reduce the demands on water and sewer for possible development on the property. 4. .The rezoning will establish consistent zoning in the area. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roar,ck_ County ~mprehensive Plan. 1. The rezoning creates consistent zoning in the area. ?lease describe the impacts} of the request on ,he Property itself, the adjoining properties, arid ti-;e s::;:;:ending area, as well as the impacts on public services and «cilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. 1. The rezoning reduces the density of possible deve.l.opment on the troperty' 2. The rezoning will reduce the amount of traffic for possible development 3. on The the prope rezoning rty. will reduce the demands. on water and sewer for possible dev elopment on the property. 4. The rezoning will establish consistent zoning in the area. - J _ O ~, ~. .~ ~ .~ ~, ~ - ~ ~ ~~ ' /~"- / ;~ ,... ~ -~ ~ lI /.l~j~ ~ ~ W N T ~' //r ~ ~ ~ V N ~- 'rte / ~/ ~ ~ f ~ Z Q Q J/ r V //~` /~ /4 / ! //% it 1...y" \ / ~ / fi i (\\\ ~' \ i ~, / ~ ~ ~ %j ~ ~ + - _~ ~ M ~ ~_ ~ ~ i ~ ,1~; i ' .M / ~a i ,v •. - / M % - ~, ~' ~ ~ ~, l S ~i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / i ~~ ~ ~/ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 M i '" y' i. ~ _ _ %~ l.'~ ~~ \ / X/ N ~ ~\ ~~ - ~ -. .. -a- ~ ~ I \~~ ; \~ _ ti _- .- o ~ \ ~, I _~r- - ~ .__r s-~ D un~ru ~.„~, ~ ~~ ~P)-su i rf;,side ~ r. ~~ ~N ~ ROANOKE COUNTY Ernest Clark, DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT Rl Conditional to R-1 ^ ^v^n^ ^ ^ u^n^ S-9 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 1997 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 9.77-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT THE SOUTH SIDE OF WOOD HAVEN ROAD APPROXIMATELY .05 MILE EAST OF ITS INTERSECTION WITH GREEN RIDGE ROAD (TAX MAP NOS. 37.05-1-1 AND 37.05-1-2) IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1, CONDITIONAL, TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1, WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF ERNEST CLARK WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on June 24, 1997, and the second reading and public hearing were held September 23, 1997; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on July 1, 1997; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 9.77 acres, as described herein, and located at the south side of Wood Haven Road approximately 0.5 mile east of its intersection with Green Ridge Road (Tax Map Numbers 37.05-1-1 and 37.05- 1-2) in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-1, Conditional, to the zoning classification of R-1, Low Density Residential District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Ernest Clark. S- 9 3. That in 1988 rezoning of this property the owner of the property voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, accepted and the Petitioner/Owner is now requesting be removed: ~ ~c~i3--9~ ~-~PzZ l~}C~ i~ bra 6,.. ~ , i,......; ~ ~ ,. a ~ ~~7-va1~5-vPizrv~~li~l~~?3" -- --- ---------_--~ - J-- 4. That the owner of the property voluntarily proffers in writing the following condition which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts: (1) One 20-foot wide pedestrian easement is to be provided between the public roads system and the property of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors in a location acceptable to the developer and School Administrative staff that would be suitable for pedestrian and non- C:\OFFICE\WPWIN\WPDOCS\AGENDA\20NING\CLARK.RZN 2 S- ~J motorized traffic. Any and all improvements with this access shall be the responsibility of the County. 5. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the southerly right-of-way of Wood Haven Road (Virginia Secondary Route 628) being a common corner of the property of Minnie G. Lewis and Stafford Lewis, as recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 589, page 196, the northwesterly corner of the point of Beginning in the herein- described tract; thence leaving the aforesaid southerly right-of-way of Wood Haven Road (Virginia Secondary Route 628) with the common line of the aforesaid Lewis property (DB 589, page 196) and the herein-described tract, S. 48° 42' 49" E. passing the common corner of the aforesaid Lewis property (DB 589, page 196) and the property of Ebenezer Baptist Church as recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in DB 1125, page 664 and passing the a common corner of the aforesaid Ebenezer Baptist Church Property (DB 1125, page 664) and the property of Roy E. Lewis and Christine E. Lewis, DB 1120, page 161, in all a total distance of 888.35' feet to an existing set stone; said point being a common corner of Roanoke County School Board as recorded in DB 597, page 112 and the northeasterly corner of the herein-described tract and on the southerly line of the aforesaid Roy E. Lewis property (DB 1120, page 161); thence leaving the property of the aforesaid Roy E. Lewis (DB 1120, page 161) and with the common line of the aforesaid Roanoke County School Board (DB 597, page 112) and herein-described tract, S. 37°59' 18" W. a distance of 244.27 feet to an existing set stone, said point being the southeasterly corner of the herein-described tract; thence continuing with a common line for the aforesaid Roanoke County School Board (DB 597, page 112) and the herein-described tract, N. 73 ° O1' 00" W. a distance of 890.55 feet to a point, said point being the common corner of the aforesaid Roanoke County School Board (DB 597, page 112) and the property of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors as recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in DB 1120, page 228 and the southwesterly corner of the herein-described tract, being on the northeasterly line of the property of Duane Williams and Alice D. Williams, as recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in DB 947, page 572; thence leaving the aforesaid Roanoke County School Board (DB 597, page 112) and with a common line of the aforesaid Williams property (DB 947, page 572) and herein-described tract, N. 02° 54' 07" W. a distance of 253.23 feet to a point, said point being a common corner of the aforesaid Williams property (DB 947, page 572) and the westerly corner of the herein-described tract and being situated on the southerly right-of-way of the aforesaid Wood Haven Road (Virginia Secondary Route 628); thence leaving the C:\OFFICE\WPWIN\WPDOCS\AGENDA\ZONING\CLARK.RZN 3 S-9 Williams property (DB 947, page 572) and with the southerly right- of-way of the aforesaid Wood Haven Road (Virginia Secondary Route 628) and herein-described tract, N. 52° 35' 33" E. 437.29 feet to the point of Beginning, and containing 9.603 acres, more or less, and being further described as Tax Map Nos. 37.05-1-1 and 37.05-1-2. 6. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are -~~~""'~ "'~ mi.,., v,,,-,;.,,. Tai,,,;.,; mot,-ntl,r ; ~ ra; rcr~+-ari to amanr~ tha ~nni ncY dis by c:\o ~lillllllllliilllllllillllillllllllllillllllllilllllllllll111llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll111111111111111111111111111111111111j~J _. - =_ -_ ~ - AGENDA ITEM NO. ._ - _ - ._ - ~" APPE CE REQUEST ~ - _ - '= PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE C'~CITIZENS COMMENTS ° ... - _. - _ - _ - ~ --_ = suBJECT: '_5~' ~ ~~' G~ C-{y ~~~ ~ ~ ~ /:`/S ~ - o ~ L~ - ~~~h 6o h ~~s °_ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. c WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND' ADDRESS ,, = FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED c = BELOW: - ° __ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to ,~ _ -_ '"' do otherwise. -' -_ •- ° i ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. ,_ Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ° - ._. -. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized a speaker and audience members is not allowed. ._ - ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ° - ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments ° with the clerk. _. - ° ~' ~_ ~ _ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - G LY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK _ PLEASE PRINT LE IB - ° ° - ° ~ - ° - ° - o. - ~.. - ._. - ° _ - i ~ ~~ ~ - ~~ d ~IIIIiiIIIIIIIlIIf11IIt111illilllltllllill II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIfiIilI1111111IIIIIIIf111111iIII1111111111111111111111iI11111Im a~ ROANpf.~ L ti A Z ';,,, ~ z v' 'a 1838 MARY H. ALLEN, CMC CLERK TO THE BOARD P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2005 FAX (703) 772-2193 November 4, 1997 Mr. George H. Altice, Jr. 4554 Stypes Branch Road Salem, VA 24153 ~t-~o[,cC.~~- Dear A4~--f~~: BRENDA J. HOLTON DEPUTY CLERK The members of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County and its citizens wish fa express their appreciation upon your retirement for your many years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to the County. 1 am pleased to send you a Resolution of Appreciation which was adopted by the Board at their meeting on September 23, 1997, and notification that a $900 Savings bond has been purchased in recognition of your years of employment with the County. This bond will be forwarded to you from the Federal Reserve Bank at a later date. Please accept my apologies for the delay in sending this resolution to you but the signed resolution was misplaced after the September 23rd Board meeting, and another one had to be typed and signed. On behalf of each member of the Board of Supervisors, they send you their best wishes fora productive retirement and continued success in the future. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Attachment cc: Joseph Sgroi, Director, Human Resources Bill Rand, Director, General Services C~~~txtt~ .off ~Z.o~xx~.o~e ® Recycled Paper 0~ ROANp~~ .s. ~' ~ z c~ ~ 2 J .ate 1836 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (540) 772-2004 Mr. Dee W. Pincock 6750 Ivy Mountain Drive Roanoke,VA 24018 Dear Mr. Pincock: P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (540) 772-2193 October 1, 1997 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BOB L. JOHNSON, CHAIRMAN HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS, VICE-CHAIRMAN VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FENTON F. °SPIKE" HARRISON, JR. CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (540) 772-2005 am pleased to inform you that, at their meeting held on Tuesday, September 23, 1997, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to appoint you as a member of the Roanoke County Commission for Senior and Challenged Citizens. This Commission is being established to address the needs of this group of citizens and make recommendations to the Board. The Board is in the process of making other appointments, and Mr. John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator, will get in touch with you when the date for the first meeting has been determined. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, or appointed to any public body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act. Your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflict of Interest Act. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Sincerely, ..~. a Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures cc: John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator C~~~xx~#~ a#' ~~~txt~~e ® Regded paper O~ AOANp,(.~ ti' ~ ~ o z ., ri ~ 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (540) 772-2004 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (540) 772-2193 October 1, 1997 Ms. Denise Swanson 5451 Lonsdale Road Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Ms. Swanson: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BOB L. JOHNSON, CHAIRMAN HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS, VICE-CHAIRMAN VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FENTON F. "SPIKE" HARRISON, JR. CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (540) 772-2005 am pleased to inform you that, at their meeting held on Tuesday, September 23, 1997, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to appoint you as a member of the Roanoke County Commission for Senior and Challenged Citizens. This Commission is being established to address the needs of this group of citizens and make recommendations to the Board. The Board is in the process of making other appointments, and Mr. John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator, will get in touch with you when the date for the first meeting has been determined. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, or appointed to any public body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act. Your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflict of Interest Act. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Sincerely, ~ ~. Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures cc: John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator P.O. BOX 29800 ® Recycled Paper O~ EiOANp~.~ a ~ p z ~ ~ 2 v a~ 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (540) 772-2004 Reverend James W. Reynolds 5139 Cherokee Hills Drive Salem, VA 24153 Dear Reverend Reynolds: October 1, 1997 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BOB L. JOHNSON, CHAIRMAN HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS, VICE-CHAIRMAN VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FENTON F. "SPIKE" HARRISON, JR. CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (540) 772-2005 I am pleased to inform you that, at their meeting held on Tuesday, September 23, 1997, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to appoint you as a member of the Roanoke County Commission for Senior and Challenged Citizens. This Commission is being established to address the needs of this group of citizens and make recommendations to the Board. The Board is in the process of making other appointments, and Mr. John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator, will get in touch with you when the date for the first meeting has been determined. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, or appointed to any public body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act. Your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflict of Interest Act. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures cc: John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator C~a~xx~#~ ~#' ~.~~rx~~~e P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (540) 772-2193 ®Recycled Paper O~ EtOANp~.~ a Z F G> ~ ~ 2 ,~ raas COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (540) 772-2004 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (540) 772-2193 October 1, 1997 Mrs. Terry Conner 6241 Poor Mountain Road Salem, VA 24153 Dear Mrs. Conner: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 60B L. JOHNSON, CHAIRMAN HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS, VICE-CHAIRMAN VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FENTON F. "SPIKE" HARRISON, JR. CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (540) 772-2005 I am pleased to inform you that, at their meeting held on Tuesday, September 23, 1997, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to appoint you as a member of the Roanoke County Commission for Senior and Challenged Citizens. This Commission is being established to address the needs of this group of citizens and make recommendations to the Board. The Board is in the process of making other appointments, and Mr. John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator, will get in touch with you when the date for the first meeting has been determined. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, or appointed to any public body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act. Your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflict of Interest Act. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Sincerely, ,~ . ~..l1L,c..,~ Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures cc: John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator (~aixx~#~ ~~ ~~~t~a~e ® R~.yaed Paper O~ pOANp,~~ ~ A z c~ z °v ~I a~ 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (540) 772-2004 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (540) 772-2193 October 1, 1997 Ms. Donna Chewning 5180 Burnt Quarter Drive Vinton, VA 24179 Dear Ms. Chewning: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BOB L. JOHNSON, CHAIRMAN HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS, VICE-CHAIRMAN VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FENTON F. "SPIKE" HARRISON, JR. CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (540) 772-2005 am pleased to inform you that, at their meeting held on Tuesday, September 23, 1997, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to appoint you as a member of the Roanoke County Commission for Senior and Challenged Citizens. This Commission is being established to address the needs of this group of citizens and make recommendations to the Board. The Board is in the process of making other appointments, and Mr. John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator, will get in touch with you when the date for the first meeting has been determined. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, or appointed to any public body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act. Your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflict of Interest Act. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures cc: John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator Cn~~x~#g .~~ ~.or~xx~~~e ®R~.yaed Paper ~ ROANp~~ O ~ ti '~ ~ z c~ ~ 2 J -ate raaa COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (540) 772-2004 C~~ixxttg a~ ~fZ.o~xt~~e P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (540) 772-2193 October 3, 1997 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BOB L. JOHNSON, CHAIRMAN HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS, VICE-CHAIRMAN VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FENTON F. "SPIKE" HARRISON, JR. CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (540) 772-2005 Rev. Steven Harris Baptist Childress' Home 860 Mt. Vernon Avenue Salem, VA 24153 Dear Reverend Harris: On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, 1 would like to thank you for offering the invocation at our meeting on Tuesday, September 23, 1997. We believe it is most important to ask for divine guidance at these meetings and the Board is very grateful for your contribution. Thank you again for sharing your time and your words with us. With kindest regards, Bob L. Johnson, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors ® Recycled Paper o~ AOANp~.~ ti p .~ ,~~ ~ C~~a~xx~~ ~~ ~a~xx~~.~.~ yeas P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE MARY H. ALLEN, CMC ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 CLERK TO THE BOARD (703) 772-2005 FAX (703) 772-2193 October 1, 1997 Mr. Cecil Hill 4840 Branch Road Roanoke, VA 24014 Dear Mr. Hill: BRENDA J. HOLTON DEPUTY CLERK The members of the Board of Supervisors wish to express their sincere appreciation for your previous service to the Grievance Panel. Citizens so responsive to the needs of their community and willing to give of themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce. am pleased to inform you that, at their meeting held on Tuesday, September 23, 1997, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to reappoint you as a member of the Grievance Panel for another two-year term. Your new term began on September 27, 1997 and will expire on September 27, 1999. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, or appointed to any public body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act. Your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflict of Interest Act. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Sincerely, J Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors MHA/bjh Enclosures cc: ources A.~ ® Recycled paper From: "Terry Harrington" < ADMO1/TLH > To: "Mary alien" <ADMO1/MHA> Date sent: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 12:10:23 + 0000 Subject: Re: Outdoor Signage Mary... I'll just do a memo to the BOS.... No need for an agenda item. From: "Mary alien" < ADMO 1 /MHA > To : adm01 /tlh Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 11:43:45 +0000 Subject: Outdoor Signage At the September 9 Board meeting, LBE asked abou the status of the work session on outdoor signage. ECH responded that that you would report back to the Board. Do you want to do this by memo or report on the 9/23 meeting? Let me know so I can add to agenda if necessary. Mary Allen, Clerk to Board 772-2003 Mary alien -- 1 -- Fri, 12 Sep 1997 12:14:29 To: adm01/tlh Subject: Rezoning -Ernest Clark -Woodhaven Date sent: Tue, 12 Aug 199710:10:40 The above rezoning request was continued from 7/22 to 8/19. Is it still scheduled for 8/19? If so, I don't have staff report, etc. for it. Also, did it need to be readvertised? . glys m~ ~y Mary alien -- 1 -- Tue, 12 Aug 1997 10:10:41 I' .. ~ ~~~'~-~ i :1 ~ ~` ~~,~ ~' ~ ~'~ _ LEGAL NOTICE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, September 23, 1997, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Ernest Clark to rezone 9.77 acre from R-1 Conditional to R-1 to construct single family residences, located at the south side of Woodhaven Road, approximately 0.5 mile east of its intersection with Green Ridge Road, Catawba Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: September 4, 1997 Mary H. A len, Cler Please publish in the Roanoke Times Tuesday, September 9, 1997 Tuesday, September 16, 1997 Direct the bill for publication to: Ernest Clark c/o Bradley Graham 1541 Penley BI. Salem, VA 24153 (540) 387-9118 SEND ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANOKE, VA 24018 MEMORANDUM ,~~~ ,~ ROANOKE COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION TO: Elmer Hodge '~ ~ J John Chambliss FROM: Pete Haislip •, -~f , _ ~ ' DATE: August 21, 1997 RE: South County District Park Master Plan I am pleased to present, for your review, a draft report and two concept plans (A and B) for a District Park in Southwest County. Concept A represents what the citizens committee would recommend if the entire site was developed as a recreation park. Concept B is their recommendation if the schools build a sports complex on the Taylor tract. Included with the report are cost estimates for the different segments of each design. Overall, I feel the concept plans and report accurately reflect the work of the citizens committee. The plans also address the many and varied outdoor recreation needs of the citizens of Southwest County. You will note the inclusion of trails and greenways, an amphitheater, and open green space which can handle large special events and family recreation activities. These amenities were a high priority of the committee as they are not readily available in south county. I would like to meet and get your input on the designs as well as develop a game plan for the presentation to the Board. Also, do we want to present this to Supervisors Eddy and Minnix prior to the entire board. Please advise. As always, thank you for your support. LEGAL NOTICE Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their 7:00 p.m. session on Tuesday, September 23, 1997, in the Board Meeting Room at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, SW, on the petition of Jimmie R. and Dorothy P. Hollandsworth requesting vacation of a portion of an existing 20-foot sanitary sewer easement located at 928 Peyton Street. All members of the public interested in this matter may appear and be heard at the time and place aforesaid. Mary H. Allen, CMC, Clerk to the Board Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Please publish in the Roanoke Times on: Tuesday, September 9, 1997 Tuesday, September 16, 1997 Direct the bill for publication to: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 V PUBLIC NOTICE Please be advised that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, at its meeting on September 23, 1997, at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, will hold a public hearing and second reading on the following matter, to-wit: ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 5-21. DEFINITIONS AND SECTION 5-24. LIMITATIONS ON NUMBER KEPT PER DWELLING UNIT OF ARTICLE II. DOGS, CATS AND OTHER ANIMALS OF CHAPTER 5 ANIMALS AND FOWLS OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO PERMIT THE KEEPING OF AS MANY AS THREE (3) DOGS IN A DWELLING UNIT AND SECTION 30-29-2. RESIDENTIAL USE TYPES (PRIVATE KENNEL) OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE All members of the public interested in this matter may appear and be heard at the time and place aforesaid. ~ rn~~ Please publish on the following dates: Tuesday, September 9, 1997 Tuesday, September 16, 1997 Please send the invoice to: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney W't'-~ q'1 ~ ^~~ ~ (~;~-V V LEGAL NOTICE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, September 23, 1997, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Alex & Betty Nelson to rezone approximately 0.33 acres from C-1 to C-2 in order to operate a pet business, located at 3534 Brambleton Avenue, Cave Spring Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: September 4, 1997 ~- Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times Tuesday, September 9, 1997 Tuesday, September 16, 1997 Direct the bill for publication to: Alex & Betty Nelson 4614 Cordell Dr, SW Roanoke, VA 24018 (540) 774-5079 SEND ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANOKE, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, September 23, 1997, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Carilion Health Corp. Inc. to rezone 1.01 acres from C-2C to C-2 in order to construct a parking lot, located behind Carilion Family Medicine on Brambleton Avenue, Windsor Hills Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: September 4, 1997 ~, ~~~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times Tuesday, September 9, 1997 Tuesday, September 16, 1997 Direct the bill for publication to: Carilion Health Corp. c/o John Christodoulides 127 McClanahan St, SW Roanoke, VA 24014 (540) 981-8834 SEND ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANOKE, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, September 23, 1997, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Valley Word Ministries for a Special Use Permit to expand the existing facility, located at 1928 Loch Haven Drive, Catawba Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: September 4, 1997 ~>~-~ ~. ~.~~.J Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times Tuesday, September 9, 1997 Tuesday, September 16, 1997 Direct the bill for publication to: Valley Word Ministries Attn: Pastor Eddie Crabtree 1928 Loch Haven Dr Roanoke, VA 24019 (540) 562-1500 SEND ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANOKE, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, September 23, 1997, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of The Easter Seal Society of VA, Inc. to obtain a Special Use Permit to allow summer concerts, located in Valleypointe, Hollins Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: September 4, 1997 .~" Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times Tuesday, September 9, 1997 Tuesday, September 16, 1997 Direct the bill for publication to: The Easter Seal Society of VA Attn: Susan Knight PO Box 5496 Roanoke, VA 24012 {540) 362-1656 SEND ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANOKE, VA 24018 V LEGAL NOTICE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, September 23, 1997, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Marc I. Wilson to rezone 0.65 acre from R-1 to C-2 to allow a minor auto repair facility, located 130 feet northwest of the intersection of Peters Creek Road and Northridge Lane, Catawba Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: September 4, 1997 ~. Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times Tuesday, September 9, 1997 Tuesday, September 16, 1997 Direct the bill for publication to: Marc I. Wilson 5001 Glenvar Heights Blvd. Salem, VA 24153 (540) 380-4045 SEND ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANOKE, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, September 23, 1997, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of F. W. Finney Construction Corp. to rezone approximately 22.01 acres from AG-3 & R-1 to R-1 to develop single family residences, located at the intersection of Finney Drive and Elizabeth Drive, Vinton Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: September 4, 1997 ,~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times Tuesday, September 9, 1997 Tuesday, September 16, 1997 Direct the bill for publication to: F.W. Finney Construction Corp. c/o Cranwell & Moore PO Box 11804 Roanoke, VA 24022 (540) 344-1000 SEND ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANOKE, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, September 23, 1997, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of the Roanoke County Planning Commission to amend the zoning ordinance to modify the definiton of a private kennel. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: September 4, 1997 l~r' - Q~p-~-n--~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times Tuesday, September 9, 1997 Tuesday, September 16, 1997 Direct the bill for publication to: ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VA 24018 (540) 772-2068 SEND ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANOKE, VA 24018 ~~~ ~~J ~/ 9l s ~ ~~ MEMO - 8/27/97 To: Supervisors From: Lee B. Eddy ,,~~~--"'° Subject: Task Force to Review Problems Encountered by the Disabled, Physically Challenged and Senior Citizens In regard to our recent discussions on this subject and the staff report of 7/22/97 that was sent to us by Mary Allen on 8/25/97, I would like to offer a few comments, as follows: 1. Since the needs of this group of citizens will. continue" , and will likely change beyond the next year, I suggest that an ongoing organization be established that will address and monitor the associated needs on a continuing basis. It could be compared to our Transportation and Safety Commission in its continuing function. 2. The name of the group needs to be simplified. One suggestion that occurs to me is "The Roanoke County Commission for Senior and Challenged Citizens." 3. The membership and methods of appointment need to be clarified. I have no problem with each Supervisor appointing two citizens who are senior or challenged, or family members thereof, but the remaining members and their method of appointment should be clarified. I suggest that staff responsibility for this group be given to John Chambliss and that he recommend a list of County employees and other providers for approval by the Board of Supervisors, with a maximum total membership of 20. 4. The purpose of the organization needs to be stated in a clear and concise way. Using the general information in the 7/22/97 staff report, I suggest a purpose statement along the following lines: "Study current services provided for senior and handicapped County citizens, identify needed changes, and recommend associated ordinance and budget action to the Hoard of Supervisors and staff. A formal report including a summary of the commission activities and recommendations for action shall be submitted to the Board of Supervisors annually, in time to be considered during the annual budget process." 5. Staff responsibility should be clearly defined. I think that John Chambliss is the logical staff person for this position. He would be responsible for convening the group the first time, and for seeing that the necessary clerical functions regarding notices and minutes are accomplished. I think that the Clerk and Deputy Clerk for the Board•of Supervisors could help with these tasks. The cost of postage, refreshments, and other minor expenses could be absorbed in the current and future budgets of the Board and the Assistant County Administrators. copy: Elmer Hodge, John Chambliss, Mary Allen