Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout3/24/1998 - RegularFLE4RT OF THE BLUE RIDGE WORKITG DOCUg NT -SUB ECT ThO REVISI ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION AGENDA MARCH 24, 1998 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement in order to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings or other programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County, please contact the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772-2005. We request that you provide at least 48-hours notice so that proper arrangements may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. ALL PRESENT AT 3:00 P.M. 2. Invocation: Gardner W. Smith, Deputy Assistant for Citizen Services 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS ITEMS ADDED EXECUTIVE SESSION PURSUANT TO SECTION 2.1-344 A: ECH ADDED (5) DISCUSSION CONCERNING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROSPECTS WHERE NO PREVIOUS i ANNOUNCEMENT HAS BEEN MADE; HCN ADDED (3) DISPOSITION OF PUBLIC PROPERTY, WELL LOT, AGENDA ITEM U-3; PMM ADDED (7) CONSULTATION WITH LEGAL COUNSEL PERTAINING TO PROBABLE LITIGATION, CONDEMNATION; AND (7) CONSULTATION WITH LEGAL COUNSEL PERTAINING TO CONTRACTUAL AGREEMENT, LOWE'S. PMM ADDED SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING CONVEYANCE OF EASEMENT TO OHIO STATE CELLULAR PHONE COMPANY, AGENDA ITEM G-2 C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Resolution of appreciation upon the retirement of Edward "Gene"Burford, General Services. R-032498- 1 HCN MOTION TO ADOPT RESO URC MR. BURFORD WAS PRESENT D. BRIEFINGS NONE E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request to accept and appropriate monies from the Virginia Juvenile Community Crime Control Act and adopt the resolution prioritizing the expenditure of the grant proceeds. (John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator) R-032498-2 HCN MOTION TO ADOPT RESO .URC 2 2. Consideration of claim by Edward C. Woodard. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) A-032498-3 FM MOTION TO DENY CLAIM URC 3. Resolution approving the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Budget for Fiscal Year 1998/99. (Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance) R-032498-4 HCN MOTION TO ADOPT RESO 4. Request for approval of the 1998/99 Cable TV Budget. (Anne Marie Green, Community Relations Director) A-032498-5 HCN MOTION TO ADOPT BUDGET OM_ 5. Adoption of resolution requesting the Virginia Department of Transportation to adopt recommended lists of Primary and Interstate projects for the 1998-2004 Six Year Improvement Plan. (Arnold Covey, Director of Engineering & Inspections) R-032498-6 FFH MOTION TO ADOPT RESO URC CHAIR DESIGNATED FFH TO ATTEND PREALLOCATION HEARING F. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS AND FIRST READINGS OF REZONING ORDINANCES - CONSENT AGENDA HCN MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND & PUBLIC HEARINGS - 4/28/98 URC 3 1. First reading of ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to add a wireless telecommunications tower to an existing facility, located at 4135 West Main Street, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Ohio State Cellular. 2. First reading of ordinance to rezone approximately 2.0 acres from C-1 to C-2 and obtain a Special Use Permit to construct a home for adults, located at the southwest corner of Rosecrest and Route 221, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the petition of Stephen and Marie Freeman. 3. First reading of ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to allow a dance hall, located at 5610 Williamson Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Taylor Yeh and Jermaine English. 4. First reading of ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to expand an existing religious assembly facility, located at 4804 Stanley Farm Road, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Glenvar Baptist Church. 5. First reading of ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to allow an outdoor gathering in the 7000 and 8000 blocks of Woodhaven Road, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Old German Baptist Church. 6. First reading of ordinance to amend the Planned Industrial District of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance and rename the district the Planned Technology Development District, upon the petition of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. 7 First reading of ordinance to rezone 456.6 acres from R-1, residential to Planning Technology Development District, for a business and commercial park, located in the 5300 block of Glenmary Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. 4 G. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Second reading of ordinance to vacate and release property interests conveyed to the Board of Supervisors in connection with roads, streets, alleys, rights -of -way, and public access in and around Pinkard Court Subdivision. (Vickie Huffman, Assistant County Attorney) 0-032498- 7 FM MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC 2. Second reading of ordinance authorizing the conveyance of an easement to Ohio State Cellular Phone Company, Inc., across a well lot on Kentland Drive. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 0-032498-8 FM MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC H. APPOINTMENTS 1. League of Older Americans Advisory Council 2. Fifth Planning District Commission - Stormwater Management Citizens' Advisory Committee FFH ASKED THAT ECH PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NOMINATION AND INFORMATION ABOUT QUALIFICATIONS I. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS 5 LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. R-032498-9 BLJ MOTION TO ADOPT CONSENT RESO URC 1. Approval of minutes - February 10, 1998, February 12, 1998, February 24, 1998 and March 10, 1998. 2. Confirmation of committee appointment to Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission. A-032498-9.a 3. Resolution requesting approval by the Virginia Department of Transportation of two proposed welcome signs and a landscaped planting area in the Clearbrook community within a public right -of -right in Roanoke County. R-032498-9.b 4. Request to donate a surplus water tank to Franklin County Parks & Recreation. A-032498-9.c HCN REQUESTED THAT COUNTY USE BE EXPLORED BEFORE DONATIONS ARE MADE BLJ SUGGESTED THAT ITEMS IN THE CONSENT AGENDA BE BROADCAST ON TV DURING MEETING. AMG RESPONDED THAT CHARACTER GENERATOR CANNOT DO THAT VOLUME OF INFO. J. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS NONE 6 K. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS NONE L. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS NONE M. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS Supervisor Harrison: Advised that he felt five meetings are needed over this two month period and one being budget oriented only. Supervisor Nickens: Advised that he thought the Board established a standard for Welcome to Roanoke County signs but now there are two versions and referred this to ECH for future review and evaluation. BLJ concurred and asked that the Board be informed of changes with sketches. ECH responded and will report back. Supervisor McNamara: (1) Advised that Bent Mountain cleanup is still going on and chippers will be kept there for some time. Thanked General Services, County Adm. and Bent Mountain citizens. (2) Advised that Windsor Hills Advisory Council will be meeting March 25th and he will have a report at the next Board meeting. Supervisor Minnix - Asked Arnold Covey to see him before he leaves. Supervisor Johnson: (1) Reported on the recent heavy rains, the flooding in Palm Valley, and possible sources of relief for that area. He advised that one remedy is the Roanoke Valley Regional Stormwater Program and asked that staff move this forward by meeting with Roanoke City and Salem to have closure. N. REPORTS HCN MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE -UW 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Accounts Paid - February 1998 5. Statement of Revenues and Expenditures as of February 28, 1998 6. Report from the Virginia Department of Transportation of changes to the Secondary System as of February 1998 7. Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investments and Portfolio Policy, as of February 28, 1998 O. WORK SESSIONS - 4th Floor Conference Room 1. Economic Development strategy - PRESENTED BY TIM GUBALA - WORK SESSION HELD FROM 4:50 P.M. UNTIL 5:20 P.M. - MCDONALD FARM, DOWNTOWN VINTON, EXPLORE, COX CABLE, NEW CENTURY -BUREAU IN PULASKI, 1-81 WIDENING SHOULD BE ADDED TO REPORT - TWG TO FOLLOW UP ON HCN SUGGESTION TO APPLY FOR MATCHING STATE GRANT REGIONALLY TO PROMOTE TOURISM DINNER RECESS 5:20 - 5:45 P.M. 2. Budget work session with School Board (5:30 p.m.) -WORK SESSION HELD FROM 5:45 P.M TO 6:55 P.M. - SCHOOL BOARD MEMBERS, STAFF, AND SCHOOL SUPERINTENDENT PRESENT -MIKE STOVALL SUGGESTED FORMING TEAM WITH TWO MEMBERS FROM SCHOOL BD, SCHOOL STAFF, BOS, AND COUNTY STAFF TO MEET TWICE A YEAR. JPM VOLUNTEERED. THERE WAS NO CONSENSUS TO MOVE FORWARD. s - SCHOOL BOARD SUBMITTED BUDGET WHICH IS DUE BY APRIL 1. - DIANE HYATT AND PENNY HODGE WILL WORK WITH SCHOOL STAFF TO BALANCE THE BUDGET AND SCHOOLS WILL REPORT BACK TO BOS. - JOINT MEETING DISCUSSED BUT NO DECISION MADE. P. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A. (5) DISCUSSION CONCERNING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROSPECTS WHERE NO PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT HAS BEEN MADE; SECTION 2.1-344 A (3) 2.1-344 A DISPOSITION OF PUBLIC PROPERTY, WELL LOT, AGENDA ITEM U-3; SECTION 2.1-344 A (7) CONSULTATION WITH LEGAL COUNSEL PERTAINING TO PROBABLE LITIGATION, CONDEMNATION; AND SECTION 2.1-344 A (7) CONSULTATION WITH LEGAL COUNSEL PERTAINING TO CONTRACTUAL AGREEMENT, LOWE'S AT 4:05, BLJ MOTION TO GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION AFTER WORK SESSION - URC EXECUTIVE SESSION HELD FROM 4:05 P.M. UNTIL 4:45 P.M. Q. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION R-032498-10 AT 4:39 P.M., BLJ MOTION TO ADOPT RESO S1_ EVENING SESSION - 7:00 P.M. R. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Resolution of Congratulations to the William Byrd High School Girls Basketball Team for winning the Group AA State Championship. 9 R-032498-11 HCN MOTION TO ADOPT RESO URC TEAM AND COACHES PRESENT TO ACCEPT S. BRIEFINGS AND PRESENTATIONS 1. Budget requests from Fire and Rescue Chiefs. PRESENTATIONS BY ECH, CHIEF RICK BURCH; CHIEF JOHN KING, VOLUNTEER FIRE CHIEFS BOARD; AND CHIEF JOE COYLE, VOLUNTEER RESCUE CHIEFS BOARD ADDITIONAL STAFFING REQUESTED FOR CAVE SPRING FIRE & RESCUE AND SUPPORT FOR GENERAL SERVICES BUDGET REQUEST FOR MAINTENANCE. REQUESTS REFERRED TO BUDGET PROCESS CHAIR ASKED ECH AND CHIEF BURCH FOR THEIR RECOMMENDATION ON CHARGING FOR SERVICES 2. Budget requests from Human Services, Social Services, Cultural and Tourism agencies. 37 CITIZENS REQUESTED FUNDS FOR ORGANIZATIONS REQUESTS REFERRED TO BUDGET PROCESS T. PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. First reading of ordinance requesting to vacate a portion of a 10-foot public utility easement located across Lots 6, 7, 8, 16, 17, and 18, Section 2, Starmount, as recorded in Plat book 3, Page 135, located in the Hollins Magisterial District. (Arnold Covey, Director of Engineering & Inspections) 10 BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND - 4/14/98 URC U. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Second reading of ordinance amending and reenacting the Comprehensive Plan by the adoption of the Roanoke Valley Regional Stormwater Management Plan as part of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning and Zoning) 0-032498-12 BLJ MOTION TO ADOPT ORD UM_ ONE CITIZEN SPOKE 2. Second reading of ordinance amending and reenacting Section 10-33, Real Estate Services, Section 10-34, Professional Services, and Section 10-36, Personal and Business Service Occupations, of Article II. Classified Business and Occupational License Provisions of Chapter 10, Licenses, to increase the gross receipts from $3,000 to $5,000 for the exemption from payment of a license fee. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 0-032498-13 FM MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC 3. Second reading of ordinance declaring a parcel of real estate surplus and authorizing sale of a well lot, Arlington Hills #2. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 0-032498-14 JPM MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC 11 4. Second reading of ordinance to rezone portions of approximately 17 acres from 1-1, C-2C and C-2 to R-1 for public parks and recreation areas, located in the 6600 block of Merriman Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning and Zoning) 0-032498-15 FM MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC 5. Second reading of ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to allow the construction of a new elementary school in the Bonsack Community, located at 5437 Crumpacker Drive, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of the Roanoke County School Board. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning and Zoning) 0-032498-16 BLJ MOTION TO ADOPT ORD WIC 6. Second reading of ordinance to rezone 9.77 acres from R- 1 conditional to R-1 to construct single family residences, located at the south side of Woodhaven Road, approximately 0.5 mile east of its intersection with Green Ridge Road in the Catawba Magisterial District upon the petition of Graham -Thomas Corporation. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning and Zoning) 0-032498-17 FFH MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC 7. Second reading of ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to construct a 190 ft. self-supporting broadcast tower on a 3.171 acre parcel located at 5585 Catawba Hospital Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Ohio State Cellular Phone Company, Inc. 12 (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning and Zoning) 0-032498-18 FFH MOTION TO ADOPT ORD 111:t_C V. CITIZENS COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS NONE W. OTHER BUSINESS 1. OHIO STATE CELLULAR LEASE MR. CREEKMORE, ATTORNEY FOR OHIO STATE, ASKED THAT THE BOARD FINALIZE THE LEASE CONCERNING DIMENSIONS OF PROPERTY, BASE RENTAL, AND TERM SO THE CONSENT ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF LITIGATION COULD BE DONE FFH MOVED THAT RENTAL BE $500 A MONTH, PROPERTY 100 X 100 AND TERM 15 YEARS. URC BLJ ASKED THAT PMM REVISE LEASE AND RECORD WITH PLAT. HCN ADVISED THAT THE DIFFERENCE IN ORIGINAL RENT OF $325 AND $500 WOULD REMAIN WITH THE COUNTY AND NOT THE FIRE STATION 2. SCHOOL CAPITAL PROJECTS HCN SUGGESTED ADDING POSITION OF CLERK OF WORKS TO MONITOR SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS. PMM ASKED TO DETERMINE IF POSITION FUNDING COULD BE ADDED TO BOND. ECH TO NOTIFY DR. GORDON. BOARD CONSENSUS TO BRING REPORT BACK TO THE BOARD. 3. UTILITY PROJECT 13 ECH ASKED FOR BOARD DIRECTION ON UTILITY PROJECT IN CATAWBA SINCE THE SIX OTHER CONNECTIONS HAD TO BE REDUCED TO FOUR. BOARD CONSENSUS TO MOVE FORWARD AND BRING BACK ORDINANCE FOR APPROVAL. W. ADJOURNMENT AT 10:50 P.M., CHAIRMAN JOHNSON ADJOURNED THE MEETING TO APRIL 14, 1998 AT 12:15 P.M. FOR JOINT MEETING WITH ROANOKE CITY COUNCIL AT RCAC, FOURTH FLOOR. JPM AND HCN ADVISED THAT THEY WILL BE ABSENT. 14 HEART OF 771E BLUE RIDGE Cauntv rrancrhe ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA MARCH 24, 1998 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement in order to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings or other programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County, please contact the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772-2005. We request that you provide at least 48-hours notice so that proper arrangements may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: Gardner W. Smith, Deputy Assistant for Citizen Services 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS i 1. Resolution of appreciation upon the retirement of Edward "Gene"Burford, General Services. D. BRIEFINGS E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request to accept and appropriate monies from the Virginia Juvenile Community Crime Control Act and adopt the resolution prioritizing the expenditure of the grant proceeds. (John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator) 2. Consideration of claim by Edward C. Woodard. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 3. Resolution approving the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Budget for Fiscal Year 1998/99. (Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance) 4. Request for approval of the 1998/99 Cable TV Budget. (Anne Marie Green, Community Relations Director) 5. Adoption of resolution requesting the Virginia Department of Transportation to adopt recommended lists of Primary and Interstate projects for the 1998-2004 Six Year Improvement Plan. (Arnold Covey, Director of Engineering & Inspections) F. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS AND FIRST READINGS OF REZONING ORDINANCES - CONSENT AGENDA 1. First reading of ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to add a wireless telecommunications tower to an existing facility, located at 4135 West Main Street, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Ohio State Cellular. 2 2. First reading of ordinance to rezone approximately 2.0 acres from C-1 to C-2 and obtain a Special Use Permit to construct a home for adults, located at the southwest corner of Rosecrest and Route 221, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the petition of Stephen and Marie Freeman. 3. First reading of ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to allow a dance hall, located at 5610 Williamson Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Taylor Yeh and Jermaine English. 4. First reading of ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to expand an existing religious assembly facility, located at 4804 Stanley Farm Road, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Glenvar Baptist Church. 5. First reading of ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to allow an outdoor gathering in the 7000 and 8000 blocks of Woodhaven Road, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Old German Baptist Church. 6. First reading of ordinance to amend the Planned Industrial District of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance and rename the district the Planned Technology Development District, upon the petition of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. 7. First reading of ordinance to rezone 456.6 acres from R-1, residential to Planning Technology Development District, for a business and commercial park, located in the 5300 block of Glenmary Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. G. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Second reading of ordinance to vacate and release property interests conveyed to the Board of Supervisors 3 in connection with roads, streets, alleys, rights -of -way, and public access in and around Pinkard Court Subdivision. (Vickie Huffman, Assistant County Attorney) H. APPOINTMENTS 1. League of Older Americans Advisory Council 2. Fifth Planning District Commission - Stormwater Management Citizens' Advisory Committee I. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Approval of minutes - February 10, 1998, February 12, 1998, February 24, 1998 and March 10, 1998. 2. Confirmation of committee appointment to Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission. 3. Resolution requesting approval by the Virginia Department of Transportation of two proposed welcome signs and a landscaped planting area in the Clearbrook community within a public right -of -right in Roanoke County. 4. Request to donate a surplus water tank to Franklin County Parks & Recreation. J. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS 4 K. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS L. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS M. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS N. REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Accounts Paid - February 1998 5. Statement of Revenues and Expenditures as of February 28, 1998 6. Report from the Virginia Department of Transportation of changes to the Secondary System as of February 1998 7 Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investments and Portfolio Policy, as of February 28, 1998 O. WORK SESSIONS - 4th Floor Conference Room 1. Economic Development strategy 2. Budget work session with School Board (5:30 p.m.) P. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 5 2.1-344 A. EVENING SESSION - 7:00 P.M. Q. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION R. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Resolution of Congratulations to the William Byrd High School Girls Basketball Team for winning the Group AA State Championship. S. BRIEFINGS AND PRESENTATIONS 1. Budget requests from Fire and Rescue Chiefs. 2. Budget requests from Human Services, Social Services, Cultural and Tourism agencies. T PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. First reading of ordinance requesting to vacate a portion of a 10-foot public utility easement located across Lots 6, 7, 8, 16, 17, and 18, Section 2, Starmount, as recorded in Plat book 3, Page 135, located in the Hollins Magisterial District. (Arnold Covey, Director of Engineering & Inspections) U. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Second reading of ordinance amending and reenacting the Comprehensive Plan by the adoption of the Roanoke Valley Regional Stormwater Management Plan as part of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. (Terry 6 Harrington, Director of Planning and Zoning) 2. Second reading of ordinance amending and reenacting Section 10-33, Real Estate Services, Section 10-34, Professional Services, and Section 10-36, Personal and Business Service Occupations, of Article II. Classified Business and Occupational License Provisions of Chapter 10, Licenses, to increase the gross receipts from $3,000 to $5,000 for the exemption from payment of a license fee. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 3. Second reading of ordinance declaring a parcel of real estate surplus and authorizing sale of a well lot, Arlington Hills #2. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 4. Second reading of ordinance to rezone portions of approximately 17 acres from 1-1, C-2C and C-2 to R-1 for public parks and recreation areas, located in the 6600 block of Merriman Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning and Zoning) 5. Second reading of ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to allow the construction of a new elementary school in the Bonsack Community, located at 5437 Crumpacker Drive, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of the Roanoke County School Board. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning and Zoning) 6. Second reading of ordinance to rezone 9.77 acres from R- 1 conditional to R-1 to construct single family residences, located at the south side of Woodhaven Road, approximately 0.5 mile east of its intersection with Green Ridge Road in the Catawba Magisterial District upon the petition of Graham -Thomas Corporation. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning and Zoning) 7. Second reading of ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to construct a 190 ft. self-supporting broadcast tower on a 3.171 acre parcel located at 5585 Catawba Hospital Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Ohio State Cellular Phone Company, Inc. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning and Zoning) V. CITIZENS COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS W. ADJOURNMENT 8 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998 RESOLUTION 032498-1 EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY UPON THE RETIREMENT OF EDWARD E. "GENE" BURFORD, GENERAL SERVICES WHEREAS, Edward E. "Gene" Burford retired from Roanoke County on March 1, 1998, after twenty-seven years of services, and was inducted into the Quarter Century Club in 1997; and WHEREAS, Mr. Burford was first employed in 1971 as a Motor Equipment Operator I in the General Services Department, and has also served as Laborer, Fuel Dispenser Attendant, Refuse Collector, and Custodian; and WHEREAS, Mr. Burford has a pleasing disposition and friendly attitude, and was always willing to go the extra mile for his co-workers, such as opening the Roanoke County Administration Center during non -operating hours; and WHEREAS, Mr. Burford, through his employment with Roanoke County, has been instrumental in improving the quality of life for its citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to EDWARD E. "GENE" BURFORD for twenty-seven years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke County. 1 FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy, restful, and productive retirement. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. HoltorY, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Joseph Sgroi, Director, Human Resources Resolutions of Appreciation File 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998 RESOLUTION EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY UPON THE RETIREMENT OF EDWARD E. "GENE" BURFORD, GENERAL SERVICES WHEREAS, Edward E. "Gene" Burford retired from Roanoke County on March 1, 1998, after twenty-seven years of services, and was inducted into the Quarter Century Club in 1997; and WHEREAS, Mr. Burford was first employed in 1971 as a Motor Equipment Operator in the General Services Department, and has also served as Laborer, Fuel Dispenser Attendant, Refuse Collector, and Custodian; and WHEREAS, Mr. Burford has a pleasing disposition and friendly attitude, and was always willing to go the extra mile for his co-workers, such as opening the Roanoke County Administration Center during non -operating hours; and WHEREAS, Mr. Burford, through his employment with Roanoke County, has been instrumental in improving the quality of life for its citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to EDWARD E. "GENE" BURFORD for twenty-seven years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke County. 1 , C - / FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy, restful, and productive retirement. 2 1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998 RESOLUTION 032498-2 APPROVING THE APPROPRIATION OF AND PRIORITIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR FY 1998-99 and FY 1999-2000 FROM THE VIRGINIA JUVENILE COMMUNITY CRIME CONTROL ACT WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke has been advised that it will receive monies from the Virginia Juvenile Community Crime Control Act in the amount of $490,374 each for FY 1998-99 and FY 1999-2000, and WHEREAS, these monies must be used to fund services for the target populations identified in the Act which include CHINS (Children in need of services), CHINSUP (Children in need of Supervision), Delinquent, Diverted, and First Offender children, and WHEREAS, the County staff has coordinated with the Director of the Court Service Unit and the Judges of the Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court to determine the services necessary to address the needs of the children appearing before the Court and before the intake officers, and WHEREAS, the services of Intensive Probation, Community Services programs, Probation Aide Services, and the purchase of services for Outreach Detention, Crisis Intervention, and group residential care have been identified as the highest priority needs for the targeted population of Roanoke County appearing before the court and the intake officers, and WHEREAS, the County recognizes the requirement to provide the local Maintenance of Effort (MOE) monies in the amount of $24,644 for each of the two fiscal 1 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County that the VJCCCA monies are hereby accepted in the amount $490,374 for FY 1998-99 and FY 1999-2000 are hereby appropriated for the above referenced programs. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Holt , Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Michael Lazzuri, Court Services Marty Gilmore Department of Juvenile Justice 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 24, 1998 AGENDA ITEM: Request to Accept and Appropriate Monies from the Virginia Juvenile Community Crime Control Act and to Adopt the Resolution Prioritizing the Expenditure of the Grant Proceeds COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: The General Assembly approved a new program called the Virginia Juvenile Community Crime Control Act (VJCCCA) during the 1995-96 fiscal year which replaced the block grant programs of the Department of Youth and Family Services. Previously, block grants funded part of Youth Haven II's operating costs and reduced the flat, per diem fee charged to all of its clients, regardless of their place of residence or placement criteria. VJCCCA monies must now be tracked based on specific children who meet eligibility criteria of the five categories of target population. Funding for the VJCCCA is based on Juvenile Crime statistics as reported by the Virginia State Police document Crime in Virginia. Roanoke County received $511,617 for FY 1997-98 and is scheduled to receive $490,374 for FY 1998-99 and a like amount for FY 1999-2000. Any unspent monies which have not been spent at the end of the biennium (June 30, 2000) must be returned to the State. There is a possibility that the General Assembly will increase the level of funding to the jurisdictions; however, the budget was to be submitted according to the estimates provided by the Department of Juvenile Justice. The Act requires a local Maintenance of Effort (MOE) which is the expenditure of local dollars to supplement the state grant. This amount has declined from $102,447 to a projected $24,644 for each year of the upcoming bi-ennium. This local effort can come from the $50,000 local contribution to the Youth Haven II program included in the operating budget. The Act requires the plan to be reviewed by the Director of the local Court Service Unit and the Judges of the local Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court. These reviews have been completed as well as a review by the Community Policy and Management Team (CPMT) which manages the Comprehensive Services Act monies on behalf of the County. The programs suggested for funding for FY 1998-99 include: A. INTENSIVE PROBATION An intensive probation program to include the classification of cases, strict supervision, and a levels program including some restrictive movements through the use of electronic monitoring. This program uses a part-time grant funded position based upon 32 hours per week to monitor the youth. This program will be supervised by the Court Service Unit. B. COMMUNITY SERVICE $26,000 The community service program could help coordinate the juveniles with the job site which will improve the possibilities of job placement. This program uses a part-time grant funded employee based upon 32 hours per week to assist in matching the youth with service opportunities. This program will be supervised by the Court Service Unit. $32,000 C. PROBATION AIDE A probation officer aide to assist in handling of case supervision requirements and the gathering of information for the completion of court ordered investigations. These services are provided by a part-time grant funded position based upon 32 hours per week. This program will be supervised by the Court Service Unit. D. OPERATING EXPENSES $22,000 Operating expenses for the part-time positions to serve this program including rent of space, telephone, office equipment, etc. to serve these functions. This program will be supervised by the Court Service Unit. E. PURCHASE OF SERVICES - NON-RESIDENTIAL These programs may be administered by either the Court Service Unit or the CPMT. $10,000 1. Expenses necessary for the treatment of youth which may include certain testing, treatments, or programs which do not result in the residential placement of the youth. 2. Outreach Detention $50,000 $25,000 2 / F. PURCHASE OF SERVICES FOR THE RESIDENTIAL PLACEMENT OF YOUTH These programs may be administered by either the Court Service Unit or the CPMT 1. Crisis Intervention programs (such as the 28-Day program of Youth Haven II or Sanctuary) $80,000 2. Group residential care per diem rates (like Youth Haven I, Youth Haven II, Drug and Alcohol programs, etc.) $170,374 G. SUPPLEMENT TO YOUTH HAVEN II Supplement to Youth Haven II for VJCCCA cases regardless of the locality involved. This cost -reducing contribution will not be available to youth not meeting the VJCCCA eligibility criteria. This category includes the $24,644 Maintenance of Effort (MOE) required for this grant and also $75,000 of VJCCCA grant monies for this purpose. $99,644 Total $515.018 Any unspent VJCCCA monies from the FY 1998-99 budget must be rolled forward in the same categories for use during the FY 1999-2000 programs. Any monies remaining at June 30, 2000, (the end of the biennium) must be returned to the State. The part-time positions referenced above are funded by the VJCCCA grant program. Should this type of funding be eliminated, the program will cease and the positions will be terminated. VJCCCA monies cannot be used to purchase Secure Detention for these youth and the monies cannot be used to supplant other funding sources. Prior to VJCCCA, the services for the targeted population have been provided though placements at Youth Haven II, through the use of Comprehensive Services Act monies for non -mandated cases, through monies budgeted for the Court Service Unit, or through the purchase of other outside services as parental placements. This proposal should maintain and possibly improve the level of services being provided to our youth. FISCAL IMPACT: Roanoke County is scheduled to receive $490,374 for the 1998-99 fiscal year to serve the targeted population in the categories shown above. Monies remaining at the end of the first fiscal year of the biennium may be carried forward to the second year; however, unspent monies at the end of the second year must be returned to the State. 3 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adopting the attached resolution which will accept the grant monies from the Virginia Juvenile Community Crime Control Act for FY 1998-99 and like amounts for FY 1999-2000, authorizing the three part-time positions (described in paragraphs A, B and C above) and appropriating the monies for the target population using the categories outlined above. The administration of the monies will be through the Court Service Unit and the Community Policy and Management Team (CPMT)of the Comprehensive Services Act as outlined above. Respectfully submitted, Approv d by John M. Chambl' s, Jr. Assistant County Administrator ACTION Approved ( ) Motion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To cc Diane Hyatt Mike Lazzuri Marty Gilmore Department of Juvenile Justice E1mr C. odg County Administrator Harrison Johnson McNamara Minnix Nickens VOTE No Yes Abs 4 • / AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER HELD ON March 24, 1998 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE APPROPRIATION OF AND PRIORITIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR FY 1998-99 and FY 1999-2000 FROM THE VIRGINIA JUVENILE COMMUNITY CRIME CONTROL ACT WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke has been advised that it will receive monies from the Virginia Juvenile Community Crime Control Act in the amount of $490,374 each for FY 1998-99 and FY 1999-2000, and WHEREAS, these monies must be used to fund services for the target populations identified in the Act which include CHINS (Children in need of services), CHINSUP (Children in need of Supervision), Delinquent, Diverted, and First Offender children, and WHEREAS, the County staff has coordinated with the Director of the Court Service Unit and the Judges of the Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court to determine the services necessary to address the needs of the children appearing before the Court and before the intake officers, and WHEREAS, the services of Intensive Probation, Community Services programs, Probation Aide Services, and the purchase of services for Outreach Detention, Crisis Intervention, and group residential care have been identified as the highest priority needs for the targeted population of Roanoke County appearing before the court and the intake officers, and WHEREAS, the County recognizes the requirement to provide the local Maintenance of Effort (MOE) monies in the amount of $24,644 for each of the two fiscal years to match said grant. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County that the VJCCCA monies are hereby accepted in the amount $490,374 for FY 1998-99 and FY 1999-2000 are hereby appropriated for the above referenced programs. A-032498-3 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 24, 1998 AGENDA ITEM: Consideration of claim by Edward C. Woodard COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Recommend denial of this claim for damages resulting from sewer backup. It would be easy and popular to pay this claim because of the small dollar amount. However, that sets a precedent for which we are not prepared. We have worked under a policy similar to that of VDOT, we provide the public utility and maintain it to our best ability. Occasionally, someone will "hit a pothole" and have damage. We are pleased to have this few number of claims with the effects of "El Nino." All surrounding localities have had similar or worse experiences. If the Board wishes to consider this claim under a "Mr. Goodwrench" policy, we should revise the policy to determine when and when not to participate. We need to establish guidelines for our participating when the property owner HAS homeowners insurance and when there is NO insurance. Do we purchase umbrella coverage for the very large claim? We need to measure depreciation and factor that into our formula. We then need to establish a reserve fund to pay claims. Based on the number of claims we have had in the past five years, $50,000 per year should be sufficient. This can be taken out of the Utility Fund but may impact rates if there is a very large claim. Again, I recommend denial. If you choose otherwise, I recommend a work session to discuss it further. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This claim by Edward C. Woodard seeks $2,470.14 for damages to their property as a result of a sewer back-up on December 16, 1997. BACKGROUND: Section 15.2-1245 et seq, of the Code of Virginia, establishes a procedure for the submission of claims by citizens to the governing body for action. The Board of Supervisors may either allow the claim and authorize its payment, or it may disallow the claim. No legal action may be maintained by any person against the County upon any claim or demand unless that person shall have first presented his claim to the board of supervisors for allowance. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: On December 16, 1997, a blockage in the main sewer line resulted in a backup of sewage into the house owned Mr. Woodard at 5523 Cynthia Drive, Roanoke, Virginia 24018. After investigation by both County staff and the VACo Insurance Programs Group Self Insurance Pool, it is determined that the facts do not justify making payment on behalf of Roanoke County. It appears that the blockage was caused by grease in the sewer line. County staff also found a tree root invasion of the sewer line. The grease may have built up behind the tree roots. Travelers Property Casualty Corp., Mr. Woodard's homeowner's insurance carrier, also declined coverage. There is prior history of a sewer blockage in an adjoining sewer line segment. On June 28, 1990, there is a record of a backup at 5517 Cynthia Drive (next door to Mr. Woodard's property). Mr. Woodard has submitted a letter from Charles R. Simpson (the prior owner) stating that a backup occurred "six or seven years ago", but this was never reported to the County. This blockage was caused by roots and grease. The line was rodded to remove the roots and grease. Then the line was televised, and no damage or structural defect to the sewer line was found. The roots were lying loose in the bottom of the line, and could have washed down from anywhere in the system as any foreign matter. The line was inspected for defects, but none were found. Therefore, no further repair work or action was warranted. On December 18, 1997, after clearing the blockage in the sewer line, a shear break in the line was found. This break has been repaired (a point repair). It is assumed that the shear break in the sewer line allowed roots to enter the line; then grease built up behind the roots, restricting the flow of sewage, and resulting in the backup into Mr. Woodward's house. These two events (June 28, 1990 and December 16, 1998) are unrelated to one another. They occurred in different sewer line segments or sections. The backup in 1990 was in a different line section and could have effected both properties. The 1997 blockage would only effect the subject property. A recent decision (1989) of the Supreme Court of Virginia (Town of Vinton v. Roger Bryant, et al, 238 Va. 229) addresses the legal issue of this claim. The sewage backup that caused the Bryant's damage occurred when a clog of grease formed in the Town's sewer line in front of Bryant's home. Prior to the backup this particular line never caused any difficulty. The Town regularly cleaned and inspected the line. The Supreme Court quoted from an earlier, similar case, to repeat that negligence cannot be presumed from the mere occurrence of damage. The plaintiff or claimant must produce evidence showing that the defendant is guilty of negligence which was the 2 proximate cause of the event. He proved only that a blockage occurred and that they suffered damage. This is not sufficient to prove that a local government is negligent, and proof of negligence is an essential element of any claim. The Board will also recall the work session of March 10, 1998, during which the Utility Director briefed the Board on the County's extensive sewer line inspection, repair and replacement program (the Utility Department annually spends approximately $1 Million on the SSER program, including $380,000 for sewer line repair and replacement). The County's inspection, repair and replacement program exceeds that of any other locality in the Roanoke Valley. FISCAL IMPACTS: Allowance of this claim will result in the payment of $2,470.14 to Mr. Edward C. Woodard. Allowance of this claim, absent a showing of any negligence on the part of the County, may result in the payment of additional, questionable claims, thereby resulting in increased costs to the Utility Fund. Since the Utility Fund is an enterprise fund, these increased costs may result in future rate increases to utility customers. ALTERNATIVES: The Board may choose among the following alternatives: 1) Allow the claim and authorize the payment of $2,470.14 to Mr. Edward C. Woodard; 2) Disallow the claim. Disallowance will permit Mr. Woodard to pursue his claim in court. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the board disallow this claim. Respectfully submitted, Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney 3 ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by: H. Odell Minnix to DENY Harrison Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) McNamara Referred ( ) Minnix To ( ) Nickens cc: File Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Edward C. Woodard 4 Town of Vinton v. Bryant 229 238 Va. 229 (1989) TOWN OF VINTON V. ROGER BRYANT, ET AL. Record No. 880382 September 22, 1989 Present: All the Justices Judgment in favor of homeowners for property damage caused by the alleged negligence of a municipality in per- mitting sewerlines to back up and sewage to enter their home was not supported by sufficient evidence and is reversed. Torts — Negligence — Evidence — Damages — Burden of Proof — Cities, ounties and Towns g in the municipal sewer line in front of the home of the plaintiffs caused a backup of sewage which entered the home. The sewer system was inspected and cleaned once a year as part of a one-year complete circle of the town. The homeowners recovered for the property damage and the municipality appeals. Negligence cannot be presumed from the mere occurrence of damage and he burden is on a plaintiff to produce evidence of preponderating weight from which the trier of fact can find that the defendant was guilty of negli- gence which was a proximate cause of the event. The evidence must prove more than a probability of negligence. Here the plaintiff homeowners failed to carry their burden of producing evidence of preponderating weight from which the jury could find that the municipality was guilty of negligence. Plaintiffs proved only that a blockage occurred in the sewer line and that they suffered damage as a result. Proof of the essential element of negli- gence as the cause of the blockage was lacking and the judgment of the trial court is reversed. ppeal from a judgment of the Circuit Court of Roanoke nty. Hon. Gerald O. Clemens, judge presiding. Reversed and final judgment. usan W. Spangler (David B. Hart; Fox, Wooten & Hart, P.C., briefs), for appellant. 230 Town of Vinton v. Bryant 238 Va. 229 (1989) Anthony F. Anderson (Melissa W. Friedman, on brief), for appellees. Chief Justice Carrico delivered the opinion of the Court. In a jury trial, the plaintiffs, Roger Bryant and Linda Bryant, recovered a verdict against the defendant, the Town of Vinton, in the sum of $2,830.74 for property damage caused by the Town's alleged negligence in permitting sewage to back up and enter the Bryants' home. The trial court entered judgment on the verdict, and we granted the Town an appeal. The Town has assigned a number of errors. In our opinion, however, the dispositive question is whether the Bryants produced sufficient evidence of negligence on the part of the Town to sup- port the jury's verdict. The evidence shows that the backup which caused the Bryants' damage occurred on January 10, 1985, when a "clog" of grease formed in the Town's sewer line located under the street in front of the Bryants' home. Prior to the backup, this particular line had never caused any difficulty. The Town inspected and cleaned each sewer line once during the year as part of a "one-year complete circle of the town." The line in question was inspected and cle- aned during the July or August preceding the January 1985 backup. The Bryants say they established negligence on the part of the Town by showing that the backup in question occurred during the winter months; that sewer lines become clogged more often during winter when the cold solidifies grease; that the Town knew sewer lines are more likely to become blocked in the winter; and that, despite this knowledge, the Town inspected and cleaned the line in question only during the summer. The Bryants maintain that a jury could reasonably conclude from the evidence that had the Town "cleaned and inspected the sewers in the winter when there is a propensity toward clogs, rather than in the summer, the sew- age backup would have been prevented." [1-2] We disagree with the Bryants. In Town of West Point v. Evans, 224 Va. 625, 299 S.E.2d 349 (1983), we said: Negligence cannot be presumed from the mere occurrence of damage. The burden is on a plaintiff to produce evidence of preponderating weight from which the trier of fact can find a -- Town of Vinton v. Bryant 231 238 Va. 229 (1989) that the defendant was guilty of negligence which was a proximate cause t resulting in damage. The a probability of negligence.evi- dence must prove more than Id. at 627-28, 299 S.E.2d at 351. In this case, the Bryants failed to carry their burden of produc- ing evidence of preponderating weight from which the jury could find the Town guilty he Towl neknowinge blockagesbare moreurden glikely uire them to prove that to occur during cold weather, was negligent in failing to inspect 3 _'; .-and clean its sewer lines during wintertime, rather than summer- q`4, time. The Town's practice, however, was to inspect and clean its '_- lines on "a one-year complete circle" program, which meant, of t necessity, that some lines would be inspected and cleaned in sum- mertime and others in wintertime. So far as the record shows, the scheduling of the line in question for summertime treatment re- sulted from mere coincidence, rather than carelessness. It was also the Town's practice to make more frequent inspec- tions of those lines in which blockages had previously occurred. The record shows conclusively, however, that no difficulty had been experienced with the line serving the Bryants' property prior to the time the backup in question occurred. Nothing in the record suggests that the Town's practices are unreasonable in any way. Indeed, the evidence is uncontradicted f �'.~ that the Town's "once a year routine maintenance" program is "consistent with what . . . other local government [entities are] doing tems " with their sewer sys [3] In the final analysis, all the Bryants proved was that a blockage occurred in the Town's sewer line and that they suffered damage as a result. Lacking is proof of the essential element of negligence as the cause of the blockage. Accordingly, set aside, of the trial court will be reversed, the juryverdict and final judgment entered here in favor of the Town. Reversed and final judgment. 5523 Cynthia Dr. Roanoke, Va. 24018 Mar. 12, 1998 To the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County: This is to verify the following; On Dec.16,1997 at approximately 7:15a.m. my home was flooded by raw sewage coming from the drain in my basement floor. This extended through both the finished and unfinished parts of our basement. The cleanup and replacement costs amounted to just under $ 2,500.00. I wish to request reimbursement for damage done due to the negligence of Roanoke County Utility Dept.. This letter is to verify the following items... A) A letter verifying that my own home insurance policy does not cover this damage. B) A letter from Charles R. Simpson confirming that this has happened before at this address. C) A letter from Service Master detailing clean-up costs $619.50 D) A letter from Carpet Village detailing the costs of carpet replacement..$1,610.64 E) A phone # (540) 982-6686 to Wes Chappell of Fret Mill Music Co. Of Roanoke Historic City Market who gave us the estimated cost of replacing our son's Bass Drum -Ludwig Rocker 16"x 22" $240.00 Total costs $2,470.14 I would appreciate your immediate attention to this matter in order to avoid legal action. Thank you. Edward C. Woodard (oun - Ctctnolc. e Comma c 4- f nti he cecd►nc-e, '► n cU ,t -�- u 5 5u.bscr', io c( Q n c 1 5Lo fbeCfQ. (No Q n, 3 to 0161 6-F nirrch , t f qt 6 b�l 4dj td (. LA c c d 4tA,DcA-c, neAuY1 Pub); L My Commission Expires February T8,1999 Charles R Simpson, Inc. January 8, 1998 RE: 5523 Cynthia Drive Roanoke, VA TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: This is to confirm that six to sevens years ago, I was the owner of the above referenced property. At this time, we experienced a sewer back-up in the main line. Due to the damage caused by the water and sewage, we had to redo the carpeting, linoleum, and baseboards, etc. in the family room, bedroom, bath, and storage room. Charles R. Simpson CRS:jcs %'l l - JAN 1998 J , ?) Received Roanoke County a -;s. Risk Mgmt '.., `c&o :Z\17Z£ZTJ1J1, P. O. BOX 20539 • 3420 ELECTRIC ROAD • ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018 TELEPHONE 774-3407 5523 Cynthia Drive Roanoke, Va. 24018 Home (540) 772-4902 Work (540) 774-3217 Jan. 7, 1998 To Whom It May Concern, On Dec. 16, 1997 at approximately 7:15 a.m., my home was flooded by raw sewage coming from the drain in my basement floor. The sewage covered the unfinished basement portion of the floor, ran into the carpeted hallway and closet, seeped into the lower part of the carpeted stairs, into the carpeted basement den, and seeped into the carpet of the downstairs bedroom and closet. Most furniture damage was minimal because of the speed which we used in attempting to get our possessions out of harm's way. My son's bass drum was damaged with the sewage seeping into its interior. Other more fragile items were lost. We spent the entire first day attempting to clean up the mess and figure out what happened. It is clear to me now that the cause was from the county's main sewage line in front of our house. This has happened before to our house (though I was not living in it at the time...approximately 6-7 years ago). Enclosed is a note verifying that my own insurance will not cover this. There is also a letter from the company that came in the following day (after our futile attempt to clean and dry the rugs) who essentially removed the padding and rugs because of the sewage and odor. They disinfected our basement and dryed it out allowing us to to remain in the house (the bacteria count had begun to climb and the odor as well) Another letter verifies the cost of rug and pad replacement and installation. Another letter verifies that this is a repeat performance at the same address. My son got an estimate on what the replacement cost would be for his bass drum. This of course does not include any of the first day expenses (three people working the majority of the day to clean out the initial sewage, a water pump's use to keep the sewage from spreading completely through the basement, a water vacuum for attempting to remove the liquid sewage from the rugs and floors. Meals for the workers.) Neither does this include the extreme inconvenience and hardship that this placed on my family and myself...five days before an Open House pertaining to work that was planned had to be canceled...lost work hours...eight days before Christmas...living for at least 3-4 weeks with only half the house available with furniture, boxes and items piled up everywhere. I am not "after blood" in terms of damages. I am willing to settle this for a little less than $2,500. However, you might have guessed that I am more than a little "ticked". I personally would prefer not to contact a lawyer over this. Therefore I strongly encourage quick action on this matter. If this is done quickly and in good faith, I will not lengthen my list of costs. If you have questions about any of this or any of the bills and estimates that are enclosed...don't hesitate to contact me. Thank You, Edward C. Woodard %! JpN 1998 �� Received Roanoke County co Risk Mgmt AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998 RESOLUTION 032498-4 APPROVING THE ROANOKE REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION BUDGET FOR FY 1998-99, UPON CERTAIN TERMS AND CONDITIONS WHEREAS, Section 24.B of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Act and Section 17.(a) of the contract between the City of Roanoke, Roanoke County, and the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission provide that the Commission shall prepare and submit its operating budget for the forthcoming fiscal year to the Board of Supervisors of the County and City Council of the City; and WHEREAS, by report dated March 11, 1998, a copy of which is on file in the office of the Clerk to the Board, the Executive Director of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission has submitted a request that the County approve the FY 1998-99 budget of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia that the FY 1998-99 budget and proposed capital expenditures for the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission as set forth in the March 11, 1998, report of the Commission Executive Director, a copy of which is incorporated by reference herein, is hereby APPROVED, and the County Administrator and the Clerk are authorized to execute and attest, respectively, on behalf of the County, any documentation, in form approved by the County Attorney, necessary to evidence said approval. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: 1 AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Hol n, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Jacqueline L. Shuck, Executive Director, RRAC Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Bob L. Johnson, Chairman, RRAC Mary F. Parker, Clerk, Roanoke City Council 2 23-Feh-98 • ATTACHMENT I FOR YEAR 1998-99 BUDGET CommBudg98A9 1997-98 Budgeted 1998-99 Budgeted EXPENSE BUDGET Expenditures Expenditures 1. Operations and Maintenance Expenses A. Salaries, Wages and Benefits $1,755,390 $1,825,253 B. Operating Expenditures 1,995,760 2,076,009 C. Other Projects 70,000 126,100 Total Operations and Maintenance 3,821,150 4,027,362 2. Non -Operating Expenses A. Interest 527,225 503,511 B. Debt Service 317,581 339,032 Total Non -Operating 844,806 842,543 3. Capital Expenses A. Capital Projects and Purchases 160,530 101,390 B. Multi -Year Projects 0 168,500 Total Capital Expenses 160,530 269,890 Total Budgeted Expenditures $4,826,486 $5,139,795 1997-98 Budgeted 1998-99 Budgeted REVENUE PROJECTIONS Projected Revenues Projected Revenues 1. Operating Revenues A. Airfield $1,003,897 $1,127,324 B. General Aviation 112,194 132,195 C. Terminal Related 3,333,031 3,949,914 D. Other Revenues 225,313 228,023 Total Projected Operating Revenues 4,674,435 5,437,456 2. Non -Operating Revenues A. Interest from Debt Service 46,000 48,000 B. Interest on Investments 400,000 370,000 Total Projected Non -Operating Revenues 446,000 418,000 Total Projected Revenue $5,120,435 $5,855,456 ATTACHMENT II Proposed Capital Expenditures (For projects expected to exceed $100,000 in cost and intended to benefit five or more accounting periods) A. Projects 1. Construct Overflow Parking Lot a.) Description: Construct 300-350 vehicle overflow, surface parking lot across Aviation Drive from airport terminal building. b.) Justification: During holidays, spring break and other heavy travel times, the current public parking lots are filled and some cars are required to park in the grass field across the street. The new overflow lot is proposed in order to avoid losing customers and to delay the need to expend funds for the construction of a parking deck. Estimated Cost: $400,000.00 B. Funding Sources Federal AIP Grant Funds -0- State Aviation Grant Funds -0- Commission Funds 400,000.00 City and County Funds -0- Estimated Total Project Funding $400,000.00 csp030598.h Comm\attachlI.bgt RESOLUTION OF THE ROANOKE REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION Adopted this llth day of March 1998 No. 03-031198 A RESOLUTION approving and adopting the Commission's Operating and Capital Purchase Budget for fiscal year 1998-99. BE IT RESOLVED by the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission that the fiscal year 1998-99 Operating and Capital Purchase Budget for the Commission as set forth in the report and accompanying attachment by the Executive Director dated March 11, 1998, is hereby approved; BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Executive Director is authorized on behalf of the Commission to submit the fiscal year 1998-99 Operating and Capital Purchase Budget, as well as a list of Proposed Capital Expenditures, to the Roanoke City Council and the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors for approval pursuant to the contract between the Commission, Roanoke City and Roanoke County dated January 28, 1987, as amended. ATTEST: OCIL—� �exAUt� Secre AYES: Macfarlane, Smith, Turner, Whittaker, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: None ACTION # ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 24, 1998 AGENDA ITEM: Approval of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Budget for Fiscal Year 1998-99. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: wA-a-via BACKGROUND: The Roanoke Regional Airport Commission is required to submit their budget to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors and the Roanoke City Council for approval before it can be formally adopted by the Commission. At its meeting on March 11, 1998, the Commission approved the attached budget for fiscal year 1998-99 to be forwarded to the governing bodies of the two localities. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The 1998-99 budget for the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission shows revenues of $5,855,456 and expenditures of $5,139,795. This reflects that airport operations are self supporting and do not require any additional supplement from either the County or the City. The Commission also adopted the attached proposed capital expenditure budget program. The capital expenditures total $400,000. These expenditures will be funded with Commission Funds. FISCAL IMPACT: On June 30, 1996, the County made its final payment of $264,640 which completed our original ten year capital contribution to the airport. There will not be any additional monies needed as a result of this budget. m:\finance\common\board\2-27-96.wpd March 18, 1998 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adopting the attached resolution approving the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission budget for the fiscal year 1998-99. SUBMITTED BY: k�.441,7 C. Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance APPROVED: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Approved () Motion by Denied () McNamara Received () Harrison Referred O Johnson To O Minnix Nickens No Yes Abs m:\finance\common\board\2-27-96.wpd March 18, 1998 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ROANOKE REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION BUDGET FOR FY 1998-99, UPON CERTAIN TERMS AND CONDITIONS WHEREAS, Section 24.B of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Act and Section 17.(a) of the contract between the City of Roanoke, Roanoke County, and the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission provide that the Commission shall prepare and submit its operating budget for the forthcoming fiscal year to the Board of Supervisors of the County and City Council of the City; and WHEREAS, by report dated March 11, 1998, a copy of which is on file in the office of the Clerk to the Board, the Executive Director of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission has submitted a request that the County approve the FY 1998-99 budget of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia that the FY 1998-99 budget and proposed capital expenditures for the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission as set forth in the March 11, 1998, report of the Commission Executive Director, a copy of which is incorporated by reference herein, is hereby APPROVED, and the County Administrator and the Clerk are authorized to execute and attest, respectively, on behalf of the County, any documentation, in form approved by the County Attorney, necessary to evidence said approval. m:\finance\common\board\2-27-96.wpd March 18, 1998 'Bob L. Johnson, Chairman Arthur M. Whittaker, Sr., Vice -Chairman J. Granger Macfarlane Claude N. Smith James M. Turner, Jr. Jacqueline L. Shuck, Executive Director Honorable Chairman and Members Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 Dear Gentlemen: March 11, 1998 5202 Aviation Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24012-1148 (540) 362-1999 FAX (540) 563-4838 ROA OKE REGIONAL AIRFORT Re: Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Fiscal Year 1998-99 Budget and Proposed Capital Expenditures In accordance with the requirements of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Act, and the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Contract dated January 28, 1987, as amended, submitted for your approval is the Airport Commission's 1998-99 proposed Operating and Capital Purchase Budget (Attachment I), as well as a separate listing of a proposed capital expenditure (Attachment II) which is expected to exceed $100,000 and is intended to benefit five or more future accounting periods. This budget was adopted by the Commission at its March 11, 1998 meeting. The Commission has been advised by bond counsel that formal approval of the budget by resolution of each of the participating political subdivisions would be appropriate. The capital expenditure list also requires formal approval. I will be pleased to respond to any questions or comments that you may have with regard to this matter. On behalf of the Commission, thank you very much for your help and cooperation. Very truly yours, Jacqueline L. Shuck Executive Director Enclosures cc: Chairman and Members, Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Mark Allan Williams, General Counsel, Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Paul M. Mahoney, Roanoke County Attorney Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk, Roanoke County Board of Supervisors csp030498.h Comm \98councn.ltr 23-Feh-98 ATTACHMENT FOR YEAR 1998-99 BUDGET CommBudg98.99 1997-98 Budgeted 1998-99 Budgeted EXPENSE BUDGET Expenditures Expenditures 1. Operations and Maintenance Expenses A. Salaries, Wages and Benefits $1,755,390 $1,825,253 B. Operating Expenditures 1,995,760 2,076,009 C. Other Projects 70,000 126,100 Total Operations and Maintenance 3,821,150 4,027,362 2. Non -Operating Expenses A. Interest 527,225 503,511 B. Debt Service 317,581 339,032 Total Non -Operating 844,806 842,543 3. Capital Expenses A. Capital Projects and Purchases 160,530 101,390 B. Multi -Year Projects 0 168,500 Total Capital Expenses 160,530 269,890 Total Budgeted Expenditures $4,826,486 $5,139,795 1997-98 Budgeted 1998-99 Budgeted REVENUE PROJECTIONS Projected Revenues Projected Revenues 1. Operating Revenues A. Airfield $1,003,897 $1,127,324 B. General Aviation 112,194 132,195 C. Terminal Related 3,333,031 3,949,914 D. Other Revenues 225,313 228,023 Total Projected Operating Revenues 4,674,435 5,437,456 2. Non -Operating Revenues A. Interest from Debt Service 46,000 48,000 B. Interest on Investments 400,000 370,000 Total Projected Non -Operating Revenues 446,000 418,000 Total Projected Revenue $5,120,435 $5,855,456 ATTACHMENT II Proposed Capital Expenditures (For projects expected to exceed $100,000 in cost and intended to benefit five or more accounting periods) A. Projects 1. Construct Overflow Parking Lot a.) Description: Construct 300-350 vehicle overflow, surface parking lot across Aviation Drive from airport terminal building. b.) Justification: During holidays, spring break and other heavy travel times, the current public parking lots are filled and some cars are required to park in the grass field across the street. The new overflow lot is proposed in order to avoid losing customers and to delay the need to expend funds for the construction of a parking deck. Estimated Cost: $400,000.00 B. Funding Sources Federal AIP Grant Funds -0- State Aviation Grant Funds -0- Commission Funds 400,000.00 City and County Funds -0- Estimated Total Project Funding $400,000.00 csp030598.h Comm lattachlI.bgt RESOLUTION OF THE ROANOKE REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION Adopted this llth day of March 1998 No. 03-031198 A RESOLUTION approving and adopting the Commission's Operating and Capital Purchase Budget for fiscal year 1998-99. BE IT RESOLVED by the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission that the fiscal year 1998-99 Operating and Capital Purchase Budget for the Commission as set forth in the report and accompanying attachment by the Executive Director dated March 11, 1998, is hereby approved; BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Executive Director is authorized on behalf of the Commission to submit the fiscal year 1998-99 Operating and Capital Purchase Budget, as well as a list of Proposed Capital Expenditures, to the Roanoke City Council and the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors for approval pursuant to the contract between the Commission, Roanoke City and Roanoke County dated January 28, 1987, as amended. ATTEST: Cack�? k P/YtGC(�it Secrets AYES: Macfarlane, Smith, Turner, Whittaker, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: None ra A-032498-5 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER E- y AT AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 24, 1998 SUBJECT: Request for Approval of FY 1998-99 Cable Television Budget COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Roanoke County, the City of Roanoke, and the Town of Vinton jointly operate Roanoke Valley Television (RVTV). The initial equipment and facilities for the television studio were funded through a capital grant from Cox Communications in the amount of $480,000. The studio is located at the Jefferson Center, and currently employs four full time staff members who produce videos and shows for the local governments and school systems which are cablecast along with government meetings on Cox Communications Channel 3 and Adelphia Communications Channel 3 in the West County area. RVTV is governed by the Roanoke Valley Regional Cable Television Committee, which includes representatives from the City, the County, and the Town. The operating budget for RVTV is provided for by the three governments, based on the proportion of Cox customers located in each jurisdiction. The governing bodies have informally agreed to provide up to 20% of the franchise fee paid by Cox Communications to fund the operations of the facility. During 1997, RVTV has produced the following for the County: nine departmental videos or public service announcements, 11 Roanoke County Todays, 11 videos, 22 live Board meetings, and has also provided upkeep of the Message Board. Additionally, a new Roanoke County School show, Accent Excellence, debuted, and will be produced quarterly. Overall, programming increased 55% in the last year, as the staff works toward the goal of increasing use of Channel 3. This is particularly impressive, considering that RVTV staff was reduced to two people for several months during the year, due to illness and turnover. The Cable Television Committee recently approved purchase of an automated playback system, which will greatly increase the number of hours per day that programming can be played on Channel 3, without increasing staff time to do so. This piece of equipment should become operational later in the spring. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Roanoke Valley Cable Television Committee has approved the attached budget for the Fiscal Year 1998-99 for the operation of RVTV. The budget includes the following highlights: Reinstatement of the Assistant Station Manager position. When the Assistant Station Manager position became vacant due to an internal promotion, it was reclassified to a television producer position. Since that time, with the current compliment of four full time staff members and the increasing demands for programming, the Cable Television Committee approved the reclassifica- tion of the position back to its original grade. Addition of a part-time production assistant. Adding an additional part time employee will allow coverage in the station during cablecasts of live Board and Council meetings, and provide for additional assistance in the video production area. The part time position can also assist with the data entry which will be needed for the new automated playback system. Cable Television staff is carried on the County's payroll and benefit system and will receive the same increase as County employees. The proposed budget includes 3% for raises for the staff, but actual raises will be at the County rate. FISCAL IMPACT: The total RVTV budget request is $197,670, of which Roanoke County's share is 33.8%, or $66,812, an increase of $2,256 over last year's budget. The total franchise fee paid by Cox to Roanoke County last year is around $405,000, and 20% of that is $81,000, or $14,000 less than this budget request. The total budget increase is 3%, due to savings in salaries from turnover. Employees entering a new position earn less than those who left the position, holding the increase for this year to a small amount. RECOMMENDATION: The Cable Television Committee recommends that the Board approve this budget request in the amount of $66,812. Anne Marie Green, APR Elmer C. Hodge Director, Community Relations County Administrator VOTE No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens to approve Harrison Denied ( ) the budget Johnson _ x Received ( ) McNamara _ x Referred ( ) Minnix _ x To () Nickens ACTION cc: File Anne Marie Green, Director, Community Relations Brent Robertson, Budget Manager Vincent Copenhaver, Finance Department Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance RVTV 1997 Productions Edited Videos Title Accent Excellence PSA Bond Christmas Parade City Stage -History Time City Stage -The Wiz City Stage -A Dolls House County Stage -Colonial Times County Stage-GlenCove Authors County Stage -Let George Do It DARE Camp Music Video Employee Orientation Fire Ability Test Fire & EMS Music Video Fire & Rescue Services Fire Safety Tips Police Recruitment Take A Stand The Permit Zone Trash Automation VIEW -Welfare Reform (3)Vocational Education PSAs Ward System Client Roanoke County Roanoke City Roanoke City Roanoke City Schools Roanoke City Schools Roanoke City Schools Roanoke County Schools Roanoke County Schools Roanoke County Schools Roanoke City Roanoke City Roanoke City Roanoke County Roanoke County Roanoke County Roanoke City Roanoke City Roanoke County Roanoke City Roanoke County Roanoke County Schools Roanoke City Length :30 5:40 1:02:00 10:00 2:33:00 2:35:00 27:00 1:03:00 40:00 5:12 12:00 5:50 4:00 6:45 1:50 11:35 9:45 13:48 5:40 5:50 1:30 3:00 OIMMOR 1997 Shows Total Title Client Time 11 City Show Roanoke City 28:50 each 11 Roanoke County Today Roanoke County 26:50 each 11 Spotlight On City Schools Roanoke City Schools 25:00 each 1 Accent Excellence Roanoke County Schools 25:00 each Totals: Overall 56 City 34 County 22 Vinton 0 Percentage City 61% County 39% Vinton 0% * Two special events were covered for the Town of Vinton - Vinton Bluegrass Festival & Dogwood Festival 1997 Live Meetings Totals Meeting 22 Board of Supervisors 25 City Council RVTV covers all major special events in the City and the County, including Press Conferences and Ground Breakings. In addition, many Training Sessions and Ceremonies are also recorded. ROANOKE VALLEYTELEVISION — GOVERNMENT AND EDUCATIONAL ACCESS 541 LUCK AVE., S.W, SUITE 145 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24016 -(703)343-0436 RVTV Productions 1996 & 1997 1996 1997 Increase Departmental Videos 18 22 +4 (+22%) Shows 29 34 +5 (+17%) Live Cablecasts 39 47 +8 (+21%) Average Hours of Programming Per Month 67* 104 +37 (+55%) Average Hours of Programming Per Year 804* 1,248 +444 (+55%) *based on hours of programming since May 1996 ' RVTV Proposed 1998-99 Budget 1010 Regular 1020 Part -Time 2100 FICA - Employer Contribution 2200 Retirement - VRS 2300 Group Health Insurance 2310 Group Dental Insurance 2400 Life Insurance - VSRS 3013 Professional Services - Other 3202 Repairs (Office Equipment) 3209 Repairs (Other Equipment) 3503 Printed Forms 3610 Advertising 5210 Postage 5230 Telephone 5235 Car Phones 5305 Motor Vehicle Insurance 5308 General Liability Insurance 5410 Lease/Rent of Equipment 5420 Lease/Rent of Buildings 5501 Travel (Milage) 5504 Travel (Convention & Conf) 5520 Dinner Meetings & Luncheons 5540 Training & Education 5801 Dues & Association Membership 6010 Office Supplies - General 6013 Small Equipment & Supplies 6014 Video Supplies 6080 Gas, Oil & Grease 6202 Subscriptions Total Budget 106,719.00 0 8,162.00 12,603.00 7,864.00 724.00 373.00 7,500.00 500.00 1,000.00 500.00 0 250.00 2,000.00 300.00 1,600.00 1,100.00 500.00 26,600.00 250.00 1,000.00 500.00 3,750.00 700.00 1,000.00 0 2,500.00 500.00 2,500.00 190,995.00 Increase over last year: $6,675 or 3% Proposed 103,060.00 8,320.00 8,521.00 13,150.00 6,078.00 280.00 361.00 7,500.00 500.00 1,000.00 500.00 500.00 250.00 2,600.00 300.00 1,600.00 1,100.00 500.00 26,600.00 250.00 1,000.00 500.00 6,000.00 700.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 3,000.00 500.00 1,000.00 197,670.00 Cox Communications 1997 Franchise Fees Cox Communications paid a 5% franchise fee to the local governments in 1997 which amounted to $1,288,556.00. The local governments have traditionally agreed to allocate up to 20% of the franchise fees collected to the RVTV Operating Budget. For the coming year, that amount would be $257,711. RVTV is requesting a budget of $197,670, which is $60,041 less than that amount. Cox calculates the percentage of subscribers in each locality as follows: City 58.8% County 33.8% Vinton 7.4% Based on those figures, each locality's contribution to an Operating Budget of $197,670 would be as follows: City $116,230 County $66,812 Vinton $14,628 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 19987 RESOLUTION 032498-6 REQUESTING VDOT TO CONTINUE FUNDING PROJECTS CURRENTLY ON THE PLAN AND ADOPT THOSE PROJECTS IDENTIFIED AS "PROJECTS NOT ON PLAN" FOR INCLUSION INTO THE 1998- 2004 PRIMARY AND INTERSTATE SIX YEAR IMPROVEMENT PLAN WHEREAS, the Six Year Improvement Program is the Commonwealth Transportation Board's plan for identifying funds anticipated to be available for highway and other forms of transportation construction; and WHEREAS, this program is updated annually to assist in the allocation of federal and state funds for interstate, primary, and secondary roads. BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia as follows: 1. That the following projects identified as "Projects on Plan" are recommended to continue to receive funding for planning and construction; and • Interstate 81 - Roanoke County is very pleased with the Interstate 81 improvement study recently published and will be forwarding our concerns within a couple of months. • Interstate 73 — Again, Roanoke County is very pleased with the progress on future Interstate 73 and we continue to support the 220 corridor as an 1-73 location. Roanoke County will be forwarding our preferred corridor/alignment later this year. • Rte. 221 (Bent Mountain Road) - Roanoke County is requesting continued allocation of funds for this project. Roanoke County is very receptive in splitting this project into two phases; especially if construction funds are not available for the whole project. Our immediate concerns are the horizontal curves within the first mile of proposed improvements. 1 • Rte. 220 South - Roanoke County is pleased that the two miles of 220 South are being straightened. We look forward to the completion of this project. • Rte. 11/460 West - Roanoke County is appreciative that this project finally made the plan. Roanoke County requests additional funding so this project can move forward as quickly as possible. • Rte. 419 - The right turn lane proposed along 419 at Hidden Valley school is also a welcome improvement and we look forward to its completion. 2. That the following projects identified as "Projects Not on Plan" have been identified by the Board of Supervisors as extremely important to the growth of Roanoke County and are requested to be included in the VDOT Six Year Improvement Program for the 1998-99 Fiscal Year. They are listed in priority order. 1. Rte. 11 (Williamson Road) Need: Now that Rte. 11 has been widened from Plantation Road (Rte. 115) to Hollins College, there remains one section of three lane road from Peters Creek Road (Rte. 117) to the Roanoke City limits. Additionally, the existing bridge over Carvins Creek does not meet current standards, and the realignment of Florist Road with Rte. 11 have created additional congestion and safety concerns. The existing section of road, 1.52 miles, is a three -lane road with the center lane used for turning movements. Ninety percent of the tracts adjacent to Williamson Road are developed for commercial use. Traffic counts: 15,000 vehicles per day from the Roanoke City limits to Peters Creek Road. This stretch of road has also been identified as an alternate route in case of a blockage on 1-81/581. Recommended Improvements: A five -lane highway with appropriate turning lanes, which will complete improvement of Williamson Road from the city limits to the intersection of Rte. 115. Cost: $10, 000, 000. 2. Rte. 115 (Plantation Road) Need: The existing road, 2.43 miles, is two lanes with many side 2 connections to residential neighborhoods. The road needs to be improved from Roanoke City limits north, to Rte. 11. If full funding is not available, various spot improvements, such as turn lanes, alignment and grade improvements, would help with safety issues. Additional land is available along the road for future development, which will increase traffic in the future. Traffic Counts: From the Roanoke City limits to Williamson Road, 11,000 vehicles per day. Recommended Improvements: Five lane flush highway with appropriate turning lanes. Cost: $12, 000, 000 - $15, 000, 000. 3. Rte. 220S (Franklin Road) Need: Increased development (Roanoke City and County) along this stretch of road is creating traffic congestion for 220 expressway and Rte. 419. This section of road is a bottleneck for local and commuter traffic. An additional lane in both directions would reduce the traffic congestion in the area. Traffic counts: 20,000 to 25,000 vehicles per day. Recommended Improvements: A six -lane divided highway with appropriate turning lanes. Cost: $10, 000, 000 3. That the Board of Supervisors request that the Commonwealth of Virginia create an expanded pool of funds to meet increasing transportation needs throughout the state. On motion of Supervisor Harrison to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: 3 Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Fred Altizer, District Engineer, VDOT The Honorable Shirley J. Wbara, Secretary of Transportation and Chairman, Commonwealth Transportation Board Lorinda G. Lionberger, Salem District, Commonwealth Transportation Board Dave Gehr, Commissioner, Department of Transportation 4 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER 5 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 24, 1998 AGENDA ITEM: Adopt a prioritized list of Primary and Interstate projects to be presented at the preallocation public hearing for the Commonwealth Transportation Board FY 98/99 Six -Year Improvement Program. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: County staff is requesting the Board of Supervisors to adopt a list of Interstate and Primary projects to present to the Virginia Department of Transportation Board Preallocation Hearing for fiscal year 1997-98, on March 31, 1998, at the Salem District. BACKGROUND: The Six Year Improvement Program is the Commonwealth Transportation Board's plan for identifying funds anticipated to be available for highway and other forms of transportation construction for distribution in the 1998-2004 plan. This program is updated annually. As a part of the development of this program, the Transportation Board conducts public hearings in each of the nine construction districts in the state to receive input from members of the General Assembly, members of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, City Council members and members of the general public. Roanoke County is within the Salem District along with eleven (11) other counties and ten (10) cities. All are lobbying for these construction funds. These federal and state funds are allocated according to formulae as mandated by state and federal statutes for interstate, primary and urban roads. i ��-- 5 SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Presently, there are seven budgeted projects in the six year improvement program in Roanoke County. Projects On Plan: Interstate 73, PE ONLY - Phase 1 corridor study is underway and should be completed within three years. At the end of three years, a preferred alignment will have been identified. Staff will review the information available and prepare a report to be presented to the Board later this year. Roanoke County should submit a preferred alignment/ corridor to VDOT for consideration. Interstate 81, PE ONLY — VDOT recently held several public meetings to discuss improvements to interstate 81. The purpose of the initial study (to be completed this year) is to solicit public input from the general public and the local government concerning inside versus outside widening and interchange alignments. Roanoke County has established an 1-81 team to review the improvements to Interstate 81 and they will present their concerns to the Board at a later date. The estimated cost to upgrade 1-81 (16+miles) in Roanoke County is $80 million. Route 11/460 (West Main Street) PE ONLY - This section of road has been added to the six -year plan and preliminary field work has already been started. VDOT should be holding a location and design public hearing sometime this year. Roanoke County will be requesting additional funding from the Commonwealth Transportation Board so this project can move forward as quickly as possible. Route Rte. 220 S (Reconstruct 1.3 MILES) and Bridge Replacement — Currently this section road is under construction and should be completed sometime this year. Additional widening and straightening of Rte. 220S is required in Roanoke County. Route 221 (Brambleton Avenue) — Construction plans are near completion and VDOT is holding a location and design public hearing April 23, 1998 at Cave Spring Junior High School to solicit additional public input. VDOT is proposing that the project be split into two phases. The first phase continues from the recent improvements to just past Cotton Hill Road. To date, no funds have been appropriated for anything but design and, this year, funds should be allocated for right-of-way purchase. Staffs biggest concern is that Ran Lynn still has not been relocated to align with Cotton Hill Road. The 2 projected traffic counts for Ran Lynn do not support realignment at this time. We request Phase I be funded as soon as possible. Route 419 (Electric Road) — Funds have been allocated to add a right -turn lane at Hidden Valley Drive. Roanoke County has two ISTEA projects listed in the current plan and they are outlined below: The Hanging Rock Battlefield Trail Phase I and II are currently in the transportation enhancement program (ISTEA) and Roanoke County continues to support the funding required to bring this project to completion. Route 616, Carlos Drive is in the rail/highway grade crossing safety improvement program and should be completed sometime this year. Projects Not On Plan: Roanoke County requests the following three roads be considered for inclusion in the interstate and primary six -year plan in the order presented: Route 11 (Williamson Road) - The widening of Rte. 11 North of Rte. 115 leaves a section of three lane road south of Rte. 115 to Roanoke City Corporate limits (existing five lane flush). There is significant congestion along this segment of road and the existing bridge structure is substandard. The district recently lowered the bridge capacity from a 25 to 20-ton weight limit over Carvins Creek. In addition, the acute alignment of Florist Road with Rte. 11 in the same vicinity creates additional congestion and safety concern. We believe that this work will compliment the proposed widening of Rte. 11 from Rte. 115 to Hollins College and have a major positive impact on the North County area. The existing section of road (1.92 miles) in question is a two-lane road with a median for turning movements. The alignment is fairly level except for a steep incline adjacent to Boxley Hills. The improvements would probably consist of a five lane flush highway with appropriate turning lanes with an estimated cost of approximately $10,000,000. Route 115 (Plantation Road) - We encourage the continuation of improvements north to Rte. 11; however, if funding is not available for the entire project, Roanoke County is asking consideration be given to additional spot improvements (turn lanes, alignment and grade improvements) at various locations. The existing road (2.43 miles) is a two-lane facility with numerous side connections to residential neighborhoods. Additional land is available 3 for future development. The road is winding in spots with some minor grade changes. The average annual daily traffic estimates for Rte. 115 is approximately 15,000 vpd from Roanoke City Corporate limits to 1-81. The improvements would probably consist of a five lane flush highway with appropriate turning lanes with an estimated cost of approximately $10,000,000. Route 220 S (from Rte. 419 to Buck Mountain Road) — This section of Rte. 220 is partially in Roanoke City and County. Development and traffic in this area has increased tremendously over the past couple of years. We request the Transportation Board review the possibility of adding additional lanes to handle the increasing traffic congestion in this area. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt the prioritized list of projects and resolution to be presented at the preallocation hearing on March 31, 1998. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: /4- iei? Arno d Covey, 'rector Elmer C. Hodge of Engineering and Inspections County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved () Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied () Harrison Received () Johnson Referred Minnix To McNamara Nickens 4 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 19987 RESOLUTION REQUESTING VDOT TO CONTINUE FUNDING PROJECTS CURRENTLY ON THE PLAN AND ADOPT THOSE PROJECTS IDENTIFIED AS "PROJECTS NOT ON PLAN" FOR INCLUSION INTO THE 1998- 2004 PRIMARY AND INTERSTATE SIX YEAR IMPROVEMENT PLAN WHEREAS, the Six Year Improvement Program is the Commonwealth Transportation Board's plan for identifying funds anticipated to be available for highway and other forms of transportation construction; and WHEREAS, this program is updated annually to assist in the allocation of federal and state funds for interstate, primary, and secondary roads. BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia as follows: 1. That the following projects identified as "Projects on Plan" are recommended to continue to receive funding for planning and construction; and • Interstate 81 - Roanoke County is very pleased with the Interstate 81 improvement study recently published and will be forwarding our concerns within a couple of months. • Interstate 73 — Again, Roanoke County is very pleased with the progress on future Interstate 73 and we continue to support the 220 corridor as an 1-73 location. Roanoke County will be forwarding our preferred corridor/alignment later this year. 1 • Rte. 221 (Bent Mountain Road) - Roanoke County is requesting continued allocation of funds for this project. Roanoke County is very receptive in splitting this project into two phases; especially if construction funds are not available for the whole project. Our immediate concerns are the horizontal curves within the first mile of proposed improvements. • Rte. 220 South - Roanoke County is pleased that the two miles of 220 South are being straightened. We look forward to the completion of this project. • • Rte. 11/460 West - Roanoke County is appreciative that this project finally made the plan. Roanoke County requests additional funding so this project can move forward as quickly as possible. Rte. 419 - The right turn lane proposed along 419 at Hidden Valley school is also a welcome improvement and we look forward to its completion. 2. That the following projects identified as "Projects Not on Plan" have been identified by the Board of Supervisors as extremely important to the growth of Roanoke County and are requested to be included in the VDOT Six Year Improvement Program for the 1998-99 Fiscal Year. They are listed in priority order. 1. Rte. 11 (Williamson Road) Need: Now that Rte. 11 has been widened from Plantation Road (Rte. 115) to Hollins College, there remains one section of three lane road from Peters Creek Road (Rte. 117) to the Roanoke City limits. Additionally, the existing bridge over Carvins Creek does not meet current standards, and the realignment of Florist Road with Rte. 11 have created additional congestion and safety concerns. The existing section of road, 1.52 miles, is a three -lane road with the center lane used for turning movements. Ninety percent of the tracts adjacent to Williamson Road are developed for commercial use. 2 Traffic counts: 15,000 vehicles per day from the Roanoke City limits to Peters Creek Road. This stretch of road has also been identified as an alternate route in case of a blockage on 1-81/581. Recommended Improvements: A five -lane highway with appropriate turning lanes, which will complete improvement of Williamson Road from the city limits to the intersection of Rte. 115. Cost: $10,000,000. 2. Rte. 115 (Plantation Road) Need: The existing road, 2.43 miles, is two lanes with many side connections to residential neighborhoods. The road needs to be improved from Roanoke City limits north, to Rte. 11. If full funding is not available, various spot improvements, such as turn lanes, alignment and grade improvements, would help with safety issues. Additional land is available along the road for future development, which will increase traffic in the future. Traffic Counts: From the Roanoke City limits to Williamson Road, 11,000 vehicles per day. Recommended Improvements: Five lane flush highway with appropriate turning lanes. Cost: $12,000,000 - $15,000,000. 3. Rte. 220S (Franklin Road) Need: Increased development (Roanoke City and County) along this stretch of road is creating traffic congestion for 220 expressway and Rte. 419. This section of road is a bottleneck for local and commuter traffic. An additional lane in both directions would reduce the traffic congestion in the area. EIS Traffic counts: 20,000 to 25,000 vehicles per day. Recommended Improvements: A six -lane divided highway with appropriate turning lanes. Cost: $10,000,000 3. That the Board of Supervisors request that the Commonwealth of Virginia create an expanded pool of funds to meet increasing transportation needs throughout the state. A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Fred Altizer, District Engineer, VDOT The Honorable Robert E. Martinez, Secretary of Transportation and Chairman, Commonwealth Transportation Board Lorinda G. Lionberger, Salem District, Commonwealth Transportation Board 4 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. / ` 7 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 24, 1998 AGENDA ITEM: Requests for Public Hearing and First Reading for Rezoning Ordinances Consent Agenda COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: The first reading on these ordinances is accomplished by adoption of these ordinances in the manner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions, rather approval satisfies the procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public hearing and second reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public hearing on these ordinances is scheduled for April 28, 1998. The titles of these ordinances are as follows: 1) An ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to add a wireless telecommunications tower to an existing facility, located at 4135 West Main Street, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Ohio State Cellular. 2) An ordinance to rezone approximately 2.0 acres from C-1 to C-2 and obtain a Special Use Permit to construct a home for adults, located at the southwest corner of Rosecrest Road and Route 221, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the petition of Stephen & Marie Freeman . 3) An ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit for a Special Use Permit to allow a dance hall, located at 5610 Williamson Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Taylor Yeh & Jermaine English. 4) An ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to expand an existing religious assembly facility, located at 4804 Stanley Farm Road, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Glenvar Baptist Church. 5) An ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to allow an outdoor gathering in the 7000 and 8000 blocks of Woodhaven Road, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Old German Baptist Church. 6) An ordinance to amend the Planned Industrial District of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance and rename the district the Planned Technology Development District, upon the petition of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. 7) An ordinance to rezone 456.6 acres from R-1, Residential to Planned Technology Development District, for a business and commercial park, located in the 5300 block of Glenmary Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. MAPS ARE ATTACHED; MORE DETAILED INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE IN THE CLERK'S OFFICE. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: (1) That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of these rezoning ordinances for the purpose of scheduling the second reading and public hearing for April 28, 1998. (2) That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth as Items 1 through 7, inclusive, and that the Clerk is authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action. Respectfully submitted, Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by Harrison Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) McNamara Referred Minnix to Nickens COUNTY OF ROANOKE • DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING • 5204 Bernard Dr.- P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (540' 772-2068 FAX (540) 772-2108 For staff use only dates ceiv d:' 2/tz./$.6" 7 received by: 5/''M application fv.: PC/ZA da;e: placards issued: SCS date: �,%',1a / Case Number::Irvarlai* " Check type of application file5, (check all that apply): • REZONING L'SPECIAL USE MI VARIANCE DanCell Inc. Agents for Ohio State Cellular Phone Company, a Florida Applicant's name: Address: Corporation d.b.a United States Cellular Wireless Communications. 621 S. Navy Blvd., Pensacola Florida 3250,7. Ph 850-453-9914 ,^ Owner's name: City of Salem, Virginia, City Manager, P.O. Box 869, Salem, Virginia Address: 24153. Ph 540-375-3007. 'Location of property: - OE5r1 1v,A-LrQ S 'c Tax Map Number: a 0 LC — j -- ( O Magisterial District: c - „) sA,- I1 S r -`.t \M- .--2-1 1•5-3 Community Planning Area: CAE, v --R--.,, Size of parcel (s): is. S----z acres Existing Zoning: ,__ I ' Existing Land use: City of Salem Glenvar Water Treatment Facility sq.ft. Proposed Land Use: To the existing Use, add a Wireless Telecommunications Facility, comprised of an approx. 60' x 60' compound with 120' Monopole tower and 1' x 24' Equipment r stag usa Cr:: Use Type: shelter. Does the 'parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested dis:ric:? YES ✓ NO IF NO,:A VAR:A.NCE-IS REQUIRED FIRST. criteria for the requested Use Type? YES NO. Does the parcel meet the minimum IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. . conditions being proffer__ with this request? YES NO If rezoning request, are : Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Crdina:-ice in c:-de.' to: is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. RIZ V Ng • • V Consultation Application Justification / hereby certify that / am either tli; am acting with the know/ed Owner's Signature: . 8 1 /2" x 1 1' concept plan - Metes and bounds description - Water and sewer application vs v Application fee Proffers, if applicable Adjoining property owners wner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and 'onsent of the owner. F,r Staff Usa Only: Case Number Applicant •:;.�..'.(.]• .-�7 7 � (�'p');i i•'�':. � . � p . .. .PERM ::Pi En , S ..�•.-'�:T".�fa%:�I:kL'.C;lll YS.��S.:�:::���:i�.^.c•^•••••••'••:-�•-:•:•••c.•:••••:-•-v••••••'•"•:•.•:•:•:•:"•:':'•:'•'•,':'•':'. DanCell Inc. Agents for Ohio State Cellular Phone Company, d.b.a. United States Cellular Wireless Communications The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need znd justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as'well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district -classification in the zoning ordinance. This request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance. The project is to be located in an Industrial Zone (I-1) and is a Permitted Use for this type impact, in short the Current Zoning supports this request. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke. County Comprehensive Plan. This project conforms to the general guidelines and polices contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive plan. To the extent that because of proper zoning, this activity will support the overall intent of the Comprehensive plan. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the. property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surr_nding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and Tire/rescue. The impact of this project on the surrounding area will be beneficial. Its services will assist the public good by providing better wireless communications services. Due to the location in a developed Industrial Zone and its limited height it will have almost no visual impact to the adjoining properties. The unmanned nature and automatic operation of this project ensures that once constructed it will not have any impact on local Water/Sewer, Roads, Schools, Parks/Recreation or other Public Services or Facilities. • w 0 .— C tn 0 4-1 g N C L.. ca E I— cn cu +.1 4-1 cca L. -0 ca c cili a) E cD c (c, o V) 4— CD 0 —a (.) 4-1 0 0 0. 0 0 t(-1 w < 2 CO U.1 V) _J 7-zt 0UJ x U.1 0 1- 76 71 El ce u LU < 0 0 a. < a. ILI z 0 0 Ce ul LLJ < < tf) U.) 0 > a. < 0 ce z Z 0 z Z z 0 Er. 1=." 2 a 0_ P7- U.S. Cellular - Glenvar Site Site #764315 120' Monopole Tower ELECTRIC METER PEDESTAL 24'-0" 5'-O" 0 Equipment Shelter 4- 120' Monopole 60' Prepared by: DanCell Inc., 621 S. Navy Blvd., Pensacola FL 32507 RT.7054 ¢ TOMAHAWK NVAR HORS.. 4�yP 1, SQUAT • "'ET/, LEW!S PARoA RESSUE SOU` STATE SQ 8 FIRE STA'. PQLICE -Ks 9� P9 A ..tA V cINITY p A �Ei , f= NORTH DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING DanCell Inc. Agents for Qhio State Cellular, Co. Tax Map # 54.04-1-10 ALIIY VS./ YI IVI I Y1.1111111M I 1111 I1V1 1 vv 1 1 YY a Vv COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 5204 Bernard Dr.' P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 ( 540` 772-2068 FAX (5401 772-2108 For staff use only app cat'•ipr," rceeivcT b, �1 t� ........��� SOS date: Case Number: jr 1 4 0 :it •S' .ii. i:i' :iji�:::; i. 1: • %i' iii!i??i'iijEE'. • .•r. •1 . Check type of application filed (check all that apply): 71 REZONING NI SPECIAL USE IN VARIANCE Applicant's name: Stephen D. and Marie Freeman ATTN: Edward A. Nett Phone: 774-1197 P.O.®DX 20068 Address: 3539 Peakwood, Roanoke, Virginia Roanoke, VA Zip Code: 24018 • Owner's name: Stephen D. and Marie Freeman Phone: 774-6500 Address: 3539 Peakwood, Roanoke, Virginia Zip Code: Location of property: Southwest corner of Rosecrest Road and Route 221 Tax. Map Number: 86.12-3- 14 & 15, 16 & aPar.tio * 86.12-3-13 Magisterial District: Windsor Hi I Is Community Planning Area: Cave Spring Size of parcel (s): 1.50 _ acres Existing Zoning: C-1 ' Existing Land Use: Vacant sq.ft. i• : ii% :i; :1 Proposed Zoning: C-2 Proposed Land Use: Independent senior living project (Home for Adults) , For st9ft Use Only use Type: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES X .. NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES X NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. / If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES X NO E:ji 'i;:. ::1 t . :feel: �j. ji?�� �:�i:;t;::::::i:jl. ':i�. ��f.� ji t [[yy;;•-•{{��1yy yj{y y`• �/t i'Y•r"F �"tY'�F'1•�1.'•••�h •I:::i::':•�: is j=.•.•. •:.: Variance of Section(t) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws V X X Consultation Application Justification PIS V 8 1 /2" x 11 " concept plan Metes and bounds description Water and sewer application NI V X X Application fee Proffers. if applicable Adjoining property owners l hereby certify that l am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acring wirh the knowledge and consent of the owner. Owner's Signature: o: V V ,LAIC.• VV Ya.NN, A A A A A l V. I WV I A U.N.. C v v Applicant :;![�::%f�;(�yi[-' —..-i i4'�'JJJ!i For Staff Use Only: Casa Number The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. The rezoning and issuance of a special use permit will further the purposes of the zoning ordinance in that it will allow for a residential use on a parcel of land located on a major highway. The residential use will be for senior residents who will be able to reside in the premises on a leasehold basis. No medical assistance will be given. The individuals residing on the property will be ful ly capable of taking care of their individual needs. The project will provide for a central kitchen facility and recreational uses while providing independent homes. The use will be compatible with the surrounding area. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. The existing zoning of the.property is commercial. The proposed use is a commercial but is not an intense commercial use and, therefore, would be appropriate in the neighborhood conservation district. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. The proposed use will not have a negative impact on public services and facilities. There will be no additional demands on roads, schools, or fire. There will be no increase in water or sewer use other than that which would be allowed in a C-1 use for which the property is presently zoned. � , E iNv' N Hd onoa . 1 /! oh 11 d! awn Nowt masa ass no a rn 4= L; I 1 gF TT 2 le ^ !.-2R I -I is& lisvE 10. !Poi 11 MI 311Pp21 Jj i 1 AIM k O- _L� I - 4- — 11 ,w f-Z-it9Y 11MK 7 r 2_ PROFFER 1. The property will be developed in substantial conformity with the Cave Spring Independent Senior Living Concept Development Plan for Doug Freeman prepared by Balzer & Associates, dated February 18, 1998. 2. The property will be used as an independent senior living center. Z:\WP50\CAROL\FREEMAN.PRO:laf02/19/98 Camry Sh. /BaonI n�Team/Boors' W Abvwb Caw, DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING tniaml mAwc STEPHEN & MARIE FREEMAN C-1 TO C-2 & SPECIAL USE'PERMIT 86.12-3-14; --15; -16 & p/o 86.12-3-13 COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 5204 Bernard Dr.• P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 ( 540' 772-2068 FAX (540) 772-2108 for start use only date received:- Zc /f received b �)i22 ' .7 application fee: r.rc=.00 PCIBZA date: ;'/7Eves placards issued: BOS date: Case Number: Q /9 Check type of application filed (check all that apply): El REZONING MSPECIAL USE ❑VARIANCE Applicant's name:Yc� J0�- Yth £ JerrrZc�.�n� E�,k Address:4b50 d OG,�, �n �l.vd. 'I�c>cr,ok, lac, a Owner's name: , j YJ Address: mQ CA:b `� VQ_ Phone::JiosQ -4109 Zip Code: Phone: Zip Code: Location of property: 6U0 l.)-Y% II; O-r-, Y ' ©c 004-JVcA. gy01 7 Size of parcel (s): (D, c6Dc3 acres sq.ft. Tax Map Number: (l) _5 _ 5 Magisterial District: HO)'i r- Community Planning Area:(Pal-Er- Creek) Existing Zoning: C '- Existing Land Use: VCACG.n 1 Proposed Zoning: C-,2. SLIP Proposed Land Use: l }••k..�\ For Staff Use On/y Use Type: Does the par t meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES V NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. Consultation Application Justification ws V 8 1 /2" x 1 1" concept plan Metes and bounds description Water and sewer application ws V Application fee Proffers, if applicable Adjoining property owners / hereby certify that / am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the know/edge a cpnsent,he owner. Owner's Signature: For Staff Use Only: Case Number Applicant :',• ... .�:•r��•-t:'��•:+.�Sl��lk.C-i�f+1`�IIYLT::�.1�3:::aaF�'�S-r•tfi�i«'i�J%::;i��il�Y�....• ..........................?: The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. Our app} tcc,1.eon c ©Q.S not- C Q +con .xr l-kr PcA.rPo S o hQ Zonin . Orc °n0.11CS, �S(1.CVion ,Tk -Fo 1occ,44to►) pro pob b L' t 55 '° 1-1/Q COmmeCckgaci Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. Pro°Q.C� Con�o�r rrnS o c� � � �. �e,n�.�-c.I ����Q1°,yes eUn pc �ckt eor�\.cl.noc\ �n fin oc).n01hE c_outni.Ad CornpoQ1flQr vQ Plcxn, �O�iCG-u.�Q i 1- iS comp canCC1 JI,J t. 1: 5 Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. U tax- cc \ i s rc F t, rY,cur,,Q o.n c ter, nQQQts ex. r C,� di, 5� bC� r,e� S r t\ry\- oc.CU.r c r rr(.,Q �oor�- c Loa, 10,5 5tA,rrou.ne pr tPVVA•5 'Yr.ro h 5actar�4 c.)rr01 \( � p � b1� no � z c;a�` Cidn and CArNr oU-CSa-r(v..nA.S • ThG. Up . cc on CIOa.s no+ Qus-5 cxe-)L acid ° A'°ore \ 50+rCrom -\- Zon°r-c Comrvr,c5t°c - r1•or 11 i } inOrar- Q.0 w°d(1'\ pi \sc �QCV°CQ i nC.Lk.cl�nq WG:er-/S .Wrcr-) rocrc), Schoo\5 / rQcrac, ° c�no \. ° `� �`: QS , J '• • 11 ♦ f . .4' r: Yc' • rs Ie ,( . pio to' • efe is' e;s ' ,lr I'!f ko , ►4 ,►�,•t r tCcs n •i: .'.c .;.1 1C par .14p,„.0 //ffiflfr/yfi CA.e1•v4- ///(/JIf 1/ 3 ;0e \fit " ri"i c. L iQ a..J o, �e yo.i �e M01E: THIS PIOPtItT IS POT LOCATED IN ► SPECIAL FLOOD M 110 1RARIA AS OESIINITED >I OF NOVS104 & VOW DETELO MENT. ALL OF ',VISION OF \ ALT11 IJF fJ• .1C• /A. BUFORO T. (LICEN5C) No 1010 I. 173 o rl, rn*rt,i SC,ft I I- _ S O ' OF.OI O T. 1UM104M ! ASSOCIATI1, /. C. Ct0,040 tAMO COWIYOKS 1110A10001L r°*"1041 Bp"`i"`' SPrt eA!7 f'o Yoe /1 Jed re* 5 /' IL' Is ..4 FLAT SNOWING HARBOR'S LAHOI'4G FISH CAMP Silt 1000 LO1 I-C APO 1HE NAJOI ?CATION OF LOT IPO. 410) LOT I. 'LOCI 14. I01LE1 MILL (P.l. 3 *0AM01;E COUNTY, MIAGiMII PlOPEtTY OF: BILLY H. HARBOUR QATt I7 HAY 1179 D.lir --3 6)6 II - NZ EN t h,-4-CuntQ., J +.01; i Flour Plan ors, 0 © F',ce .... coo\v.i AND ZONING F1 m5 444 `• LA MArSON `ou G OURMET ----- -, \\°�rawu►ibi >+ c r r ea r ;704 n }GARDENS rT. t } ++: PRANCE TO $ AIRPORT e. Qwr�T TOWNE SQUARE SHOPPRff CENT R 1! 65 3fa r 6603 H3 ea 64 ri 5539 62 5525, a rfJ� � ERr,Ct TJEATERS P0, 25.1 5633 5523 36 Roanoke Mello/ Hygiene Service 1.00 Ac NORTH 3.20Ac DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING Yeh-English Site Tax Map #38.10-5-8 COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 5204 Bernard Dr.-.. P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 ( 540' 772-2068 FAX (540) 772-2108 For staff use only date r ceiv d:' Der ` tS received by: .��► appii ation ee: 0 . PC/EZ da-e: 'T...r SOS .,ate: l Ca Number: R. ri •.• .• .• .............................. .................. l• VARIANCE Check type of application filed (check all that apply): aitPECIAL USE IN REZONING Ca %z/ r A. ;46O "' (-(Z)1-((, Applicant's name: ri Ate.. %3 a�G7 '�i3 fi Cr%i Address: 4904 .511/e1 Farol Ld, Set Elm U4 2-41s3 Ph o n • She' .. Z 14 `i Zip Code: Z4 1.C3 , Owner's name: a Ie.twAiz. %3,i7 h + C L.r(1+ Phone: 3t4-2-147 Fawn ,c°.,� Zip Code: Z �{ r Address: 'hog{ SMei kJ., 'I Skitahf U/1• 2'5 3 Location of property: • '/fi4 57? -,i /e-} ritervt. 5A-k- `, Uil- Z4/ S 3 Tax Map Number: 5'4. d Z. - 4- 3 s" t 54. t'—+1�-53' Magisterial District: C',ra r/k,A3.4 Community Planning Area: 6 � i Mk Size of parcel (s): /}i`ce. _ 1 2' acres Existing Zoning: K. ' Existing Land Use: DD , �o:, Fe-%� AS5L?t."i4d'r Til 7ct q s .ft. • . •'f. y•'1L '�•G���'II•}��:Fpr�:� '- Proposed Zoning: g - ! Proposed Land Use: ADO ,400 i r( )A-1- 84,1-44,C0c :nt' it Iced/e6,,ds4:10 iLA-/I 70 eMr• nt!3 C it.Le c .1 l cc%/bisj For staff Use Cr:.`: Use Type: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, wi:: YES g/ . NO IF NO, A VARIANCE h, and frontage requirements of the requested disJlot? IS REQUIRED FIRST. requested Use Type? YES i/ NO Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffe'e= with this request? YES • NO Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in c:te: to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT EE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. pus, v Consultation Application Justification 8 1 /2" x 1 1" concept plan Metes and bounds description Water and sewer application ws V Application fee Proffers, if applicable Adjoining property owners 1 hereby certify that l am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner. Owner's Signature: For .i GLENVAR BAP-fHURCH • Applicant a Ie/i VAL 4804 Stanley Farm Rd. Salem, VA 24153 (703) 380-2167 JAMES K. JETT Pastor • The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use pe (703) 380 4074 justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. 411-4 Cliwo—t f y<4,, Please explain haw the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the tzoning ordinance. +r! p/ yV�,4,4 0-4- , -Gc r ? 4- epy-e -, le ..d c- i ,,,,AL., L : �%Ci l�Li.../ ?�r� ei A,.a,(-e-u .. i-.-I .. ie,_ el--r..z-r r.. ,. . a - z...-Z --i'-0,-,-t f1-6'"2-r- '-` "` / xe.-L- 0iiz N—t 2 c r 1— .. cP-r,,-3`' a z. fr—'-4-3. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. 4/..12e. / a--?---r-r-6.1-e—r_f Please describe the impact(s) of the request on t„e property itself, the adjoining properties, and the sur:c;:nding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. -- ..x-a^ + ° G f t--,�+.7 l�Zt,-ex, t c. a.-z.�..),_,_,,,,,,,,:„<„, ,.:7_,L_ pi_.4-p., ,,,) ,d-t,,,-,e -e-,-5 „..-z._ ?,,t,..,,-,... A.,Le-e...e ,...,...._ ;�/�/� C, b(1--C f6„%✓t J//)rq1�',- �i . ✓ SV '+o 484,6 48.1 R77054 0 P ( % \1' TOMAH 1 6 e a �p u CHE' �� a J S7} ^Oho zCH QK@ H1LcczLS��OP a A.4 F_, ,yG 3� a '�-*vo ARROW gq pR V I C' I T IV1 13 48.2 L16 Ac 49 6.45Ac 10 7814c 8.42 Ac 490559 1.67Ac 61 40. '4- 5.11Ac (I 5854C 40 5/47 Hills 40 1.70Ac r45 r 9tENVAR 'O.. EAST �E c\P. ��, c �r ro VIP 1 GLH .ma) 03 k , 141 Site VAR',. PARK $Q R i, • - LEW1S, PARKA Rf .: ° SF E S7R'. r POLICE • . ' p1 P Q b ` 0 tCsf 4i .Id4l 103 Ac, 2.17Ac 4805 42 �._. 36 1.66 Ac 4807 55 4043 2.86 Ac ' 6/omvrrBaptist a. 15.1 4854 to • 5,1, sail 26 saki .094c (C l 27 582 Ac(M 4.78Ac(C) 10.95 Ac 20 1.60Ac \ 4737 473/ • 16 2.834c NORTH 18 LO'• 4c 46/3 13 r" 1.53Ac (Ul I. 15 Ac(C1 47JS 19 207 Ac e 43 I.IOAc DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING Glenvar Baptist Church Site AND ZONING . Tax Map Numbers #54.02-4-35, #54.02-4-55 COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 5204 Bernard Dr. P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 ( 540' 772-2068 FAX (540) 772-2108 Check type of application filed (check all that apply): 0 REZONING riSPECIAL USE !VARIANCE zed For staff use only date7cved/? r rec7OW ap /ii�ccation fee: PC/BZA dare: placards issued: BOS date: Case Number: //— q Applicant's name: Old German Baptist Church Address: 7629 Wood Haven Rd Roanoke Va Phone: 562-0098 Zip Code: 24019 Owner's name: Darrell E Bower Earl E Bowman Jr, Harold W Reed Jr, John Sowers Address: 7629 Wood Haven Rd Roanoke Va Phone: 562-4890 Zip Code: 24019 Location of property: 7000 & 8000 Block of Woodhaven Rd Tax Map Number:2617.1.1 ; .2618.1.14,14.1 3705.1.2/E , 25, 2-g, 29 Magisterial District: Catawba Community Planning Area: Peters Creek Size of parcel (s): 'i5/75 acres sq.ft. Existing Zoning: R1 / T1 Existing Land Use: Single Family Residential / Religous Assembly :fir • Proposed Zoning: Proposed Land Use: Special Use for Outdoor Gathering For Staff Use Oriy Use Type: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, w,^:icth, and frontage requirements of the requested dist::c:? YES XX NO IF NO, A VAF1,,NCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES XX NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffer_c with this request? YES XX NO Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in crier to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ,ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. P.M V Consultation Application Justification RI; V l^vt 8 1 /2" x 1 1" concept plan Metes and bounds description Water and sewer application Fits v ,J 4 Application fee Proffers, if applicable Adjoining property owners / hereby certify that / am either the owner of the property or the owner's gent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner. Owner's Signature: OLD GERMAN BAPTIST CHURCH ANNUAL CONFERENCE 1999 SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLI CA TION Sec. 30-87-3 Outdoor Gatherings 1 . The Old German Baptist Church is applying for a special use permit to hold their annual conference on private property at 7629 Wood Haven Road in Roanoke County. This conference will be held beginning May 22 ,1999 and continuing through May 25 ,1999 with approximately 2500 to 3500 attending. This conference has been held annually for over 100 years in various states,and occurs each year on Pentecost. This conference will attract members and families from over the United States. Also in conjunction with the conference, there will be provisions made for an activities area for the youngfolks. These activities will be held 3/4 mile west of the conference grounds at 7935 Wood Haven Road and 8625 Ram Drive with approximately 750-900 attending. These youngfolks activities will be fully chaperoned by church personnel and will include such activities as volleyball, basketball, relay races, and singing. The general format of the conference will be religious type services with preaching and singing. There will be no charges made to attend this conference and will be open to the public. Services will be as follows: Sat May 22 10:00 A M to 12:00 A M 2:00 P M to 4:00 P M Sun May 23 7:00 A M ..to 7:30 A M 10:00 A M to 12:00 A M 2:00PMto 3:30 PM 5:00PMto 11:OOPM Mon May 24 7:00 A M to 7:30 A M 10:00 A M to 12:00 A M 2:00PMto 4:00 PM 7:00PMto 9:00 PM Tues May 25 7:00 A M to 7:30 A M 9:00 A M to Afternoon General Worship Services General Worship Services Morning Worship Service General Worship Services General Worship Services Communion Service Morning Worship Service General Worship Services General Worship Services General Worship Services Morning Worship Service Business Meeting The schedule of activities for the youngfolks will be as follows: Fri May 21 early evening to 11:00 P M Sat May 22 late afternoon to 11:00 P M Sun May 23 late afternoon to 11:00 P M MonMay24 4:30 P M to 6:30 P M Tues May 25 late afternoon to 11:00 P M The conference site is on approximately 35 acres of well established and maintained turf which will provide adequate space for all of our meetings and parking on site. We expect approximately 1000 to 1500 vehicles. The youngfolks site is approximately 25 acres of well established and maintained turf and has adequate space for all activities and parking. We plan to erect temporary facilities consisting of two tents, one 101 ft. x 135 ft. to be used for worship services and business meetings, and one 69 ft. x 110 ft .which will have an adjacent wood structure and be used for meal preparations and dining. Also one or two smaller tents for special order meals and snacks. The temporary facilities at the site for youngfolks consist of an 80 ft. x 110 ft. for meeting and dining. 2 A. Restroom facilities will be temporary enclosures built and maintained according Roanoke County Health Department regulations. Restroom facilities for the youngfolks area will be a rented mobile unit.Other portable units will be placed at random on the conference site and at the youngfolks activities area as needed. Units accessible to persons with disabilities will be provided at both locations. Any grey water will be disposed of according to Roanoke County Health Dept. regulations: Food will be prepared and served at both locations .No charges will be made for food prepared and served in the Dining Tent and at the youngfolks activities area. All food preparation and storage will be in accordance with Roanoke County Health Department regulations. There will be a concessions operation at the conference grounds offering short orders and plate lunches for sale. Those operating these concessions will be required and responsible for obtaining the necessary permits and adhere to Roanoke County Health Department regulations. Lodging for families and friends coming from out of town will be provided by the church members in this area. Some attendees will be using the area hotels and and motels. A limited number of self contained campers will be allowed on the conference site for persons with disabilities. Garbage and trash will be collected daily, and disposed of through a dumpster type system at both the conference grounds and the youngfolks activities. This disposal will be according to Roanoke County Health Department regulations. 2 B. First Aid and emergency services will be available on site at all times during the conference and at the youngfolks` activities. We expect to work with local emergency services to meet any requirements they might have. Additionally, the Hollins Fire and Rescue Squad Station is located within 2 '/2 miles of the conference site. Security lighting will be provided in all areas of the conference grounds and the youngfolks activities area. Personnel will be on site 24 hrs a day , securing the conference. / 2C,D On site parking will be provided for both the conference and the youngfolks activities. Church personnel will be directing the on site parking at both locations. Off site traffic assistance will be by off duty officers hired from the Roanoke County Police Department. Representatives from the church have been in contact with the police and expect full co-operation from both the county officers and the church personnel, to achieve as smooth of traffic flow as possible. 1000-1500 vehicles are expected for this conference. Parking layouts and direction for traffic flow will be determined well in advance of the conference by a committee of our members. An alternate parking plan will be in place in case of adverse weather. We will provide at least 1 entrance and exit for use of emergency vehicles at all times. 2 E. Adequate security lighting will be provided at both locations, and will remain lighted all night. At the youngfolks activities area there will be adequate lighting to play volleyball and other activities. This lighting will be installed on poles and directed downward and away from adjoining property lines. These lights will be turned off at 11:00 P M each night. 2 F. There will be no music at either site. The only public address system will be inside the tents, with only enough volume for people in the tents. We do not propose to change the zoning or land use at these sites. This conference will be temporary, lasting only 4 days. The current zoning and land use will be the same after the conference as before. We don't expect to impact the property itself or the adjoining properties. Most of the adjoining property owners have been made aware of this conference and we have had only positive comments. Public services and facilities should not be impacted as we expect to provide on site water and sanitation facilities. We expect to comply with all state and county regulations and to obtain all required permits. Summary; We recognize that this request is for a departure from the normal use of this property. Our practice is to hold a quiet, peaceful conference with as little disturbance to our neighbors as possible. This conference has been held in Roanoke County in 1895,1913,1933,and 1949. It also was held in Franklin County , Va. in 1961,1973, and 1986. We look forward to holding this conference again in Roanoke County and appreciate the cooperation shown to us already by the staff of the various Roanoke County offices and for your consideration of this project. ,41 4 0 2. \s, \ RI 1 \ '' 1 , \ \ \ \ \\., \ \ 1 \ , • \ Ci. i i,71 NI-- ' •„. .. ' , • . i\ ...' ''' . , ., ' . \ 4, \ s. \ . i ..• , \ \\ \ \ .... . \ .f" \ .. \ \ `. 1r \ .e, -..... .; ' \' ...."---\---", ' \ \ ‘ I 1 t.7_;., . . \ \ ,..., ' ,,„ ..„ x.. .. • , . , \ .., ! \ N\ \ \ \ .. \\ \ --, . \ N N \ ‘I . ......., • \ \ ' N, N. N- • .N N —.: \ \ \ \ \ N N. \ l.... N 'N N. N — N. \ N . N. N. N• --- -..... N N , ...„ -..N \ .--.. N. • \ \ ..44. \ ,_. N\ ..1-2,... \ \ ' \ \ \ —i— — \ \ fT 1 1111 j I I \ ...) 1 - 77 \ 1 I `C7I i 1 U 1 NI 1 h 7.374A1 1 tt 1 I i I CI I a 4 I .74--i odl 054 / , 1 I . 1 11+ .i. ,------ ( ( 0_/ \ .--= ..,, \ ....„. .. • ,=. aL 11°17!:: W.= / I 'Iq! / ....-- • / I / . ....-- .,•- ..- ow • • • • \ 1 .•,..-... ; \ .....-, m—,--_.- \ 1......E I el...—. ....-.= et .•.-- .....= O. . ,...: '..• 4,416 Nirac, 40 rfiI acQ� • `4'iz -7 -i �o � 43 T_0 II.4`rli%1\, 1 �' r?`''grz NuFFMa►J CALVII,I �Kl3T ��L1f S=4112e.s I EiJ 1c6 : Jo- 115• Zegs Zt 20x40 CAN AR 11,4(5 PA ek.s ce212ELL Bow�R 6ac. PEo1�LE5 _ 1g611 - 01-0 cERMAr1 l 4p1 5T ,4NNUAL G014 E.t2ENGE '-(oUNt�Fot_K5 OGT%Vt'rIES ,6R9A.___ ROA NOKE , VA. 1111111111111 1 11111?( Sc4L6 1 J FICCT JAW. 31. 19'18 5ce1-t ills ?00' F NORTH DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING Old German Baptist Church Site AND ZONING . Tax Map Numbers # 26.17-1-1, #26.18-1-14,14.1 # 37.05-1-24,25,28,29 C.o Planned Technology Development District (PTD) (Revision Request for the Planned Industrial Development District - PID) SEC. 30-63. PTD PLANNED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT. Sec. 30-63-1. Purpose. (A) The Planned Technology Development (PTD) district is established primarily for Type I and Type II manufacturing and industrial uses. Supporting accessory uses and facilities, such as office, commercial establishments, and residential areas are also permitted. The PTD district is intended to be designed with a park -like setting that complements surrounding land uses by means of appropriate siting of buildings, controlled access points, attractive and harmonious architecture, effective landscape buffering and scenic view easements. The district is intended to provide flexibility in design and site layout, allow latitude in combining different use types within a single development, and provide the developer with incentives to create an aesthetically pleasing and functional planned development. In addition, the intent of the Planned Technology Development (PTD) district is to provide certain industries that are clean and environmentally efficient the opportunity to locate in an area of like technologies in what is generally known as a mixed use park, developed under a complete, comprehensive Master Plan. Standards are provided for landscaping, buffering and open space to encourage high technology industries and to ensure a park -like atmosphere. Important in determining the location and size of a PTD are the accessibility of the location, the availability of public utilities, public safety services and the suitability of the topography for site and building development purposes. Sec. 30-63-2. Permitted Uses. (A) All of the residential, civic, office, commercial, industrial and miscellaneous use types listed in Article II of this ordinance are permitted in the PTD district. Residential use types shall be limited to no more than fifteen (15) percent of the total gross square footage. No use shall be permitted except in conformity with the uses specifically included in the Final Master Plan Sec. 30-63-3. Site Development Regulations. (A) Each planned technological development shall be subject to the following site development standards: 1. Minimum district size: 10 acres of contiguous land. 2. Minimum front setbacks: All structures proposed to front on existing public streets external to the PTD shall be located a minimum of 30 feet from the existing public right-of-way. 3. Lots in the PTD district shall comply with the buffer yard requirements of Section P-- 30-92-4 of this ordinance. (Request that Type F with 100 foot natural buffers for areas adjacent to neighborhood districts be included. 4. Lot coverage: Maximum lot coverage shall be determined through the preliminary master plan process and shall not exceed seventy-five (75) percent. The only exception would be the Limited Building Zones that contain scenic view easements 5. All Streets in the PTD district shall be public in accordance with VDOT and Roanoke County standards. However, private roads are allowed in topography with a slope that exceeds 25% with the condition that VDOT and Roanoke County are absolved from any maintenance or upgrade responsibilities. 6. The applicant may propose a reduction to the number of parking spaces required by this ordinance for each use type, if justified. This proposal will be reviewed with consideration given to potential future uses of the site, parking demand and expansion potential. Additional parking spaces or expansion proposals are not applicable to the Limited Building Zone (LBZ) areas. 7. Maximum height of structures: When adjoining property zoned Residential, 45 feet, including rooftop mechanical equipment. The maximum height may be increased provided each required yard (side, rear, or buffer) adjoining a Residential district is increased two feet for each foot in height over 45 feet. This distance shall be measure from the portion of the structure which exceeds 45 feet. In all other locations the height is limited. 8. Arrangement of areas: a. The location and arrangement of structures, parking, access drives, outdoor lighting, signs, and other uses and developments within the PTD, in addition to achieving these development standards, shall be accomplished in accordance with an approved final master plan to assure compatibility with the existing and future land use in the vicinity. b. All areas designed for future expansion or not intended for immediate improvement or development shall be specified as reserve areas in the preliminary master plan. The future use and the limitations on future use of such area shall be specified, or else such areas shall not be included as part of the PTD application. Reserve areas included in the PTD shall be landscaped or otherwise maintained in a neat and orderly manner. 9. Accessory structures shall not exceed forty percent of the gross floor area of the principal structure. 10. Every structure in the PTD shall be a fully enclosed building of permanent construction. Any outside storage area shall be fully screened so that no materials so stored are visible at any lot line or public right-of-way. 11. Lighting: Lighting shall comply with Section 30-94 of this ordinance. 12. Utilities: Utilities shall be underground unless the type of service necessary for normal activities of the industry or business shall prohibit underground installation. Sec. 30-63-4 Site Development Recommendations (A) The Planned Technology Development district should be designed and developed as an technological park with high standards for landscaping, buffering and open space. To ensure a park -like atmosphere the following site development recommendations are made. (1) The principal entrance into the PTD district should be sufficiently landscaped to comply with the purposes of this district. In addition, the first one -hundred linear feet of street, leading through this principal entrance into the PTD, should have a landscaped median of sufficient width and planting density to meet the purposes of this district. (2) Parking within the PTD should be located to the side or rear of the principal structures on the lot, wherever feasible. During review, consideration will be given to topographical constraints, innovative site design, buffering and landscaping factors. (3) Loading areas should be screened from public view and should not be placed in front yards. (4) Fences should not be placed in front yards except as necessary for security purposes. Fencing should be uniform and well kept. (5) Compliance with Noise Ordinance 081997-7 Sec. 30-63-5 Relationship to Existing Development Regulations (A) All zoning regulations shall apply to the development of the PTD district, unless modified by the Board of Supervisors in the approval of the final master plan. Sec. 30-63-6 Application Process (A) The timeframes outlined in the Section are the maximum timeframes mandated by the Code of Virginia. Roanoke County will make every reasonable effort to complete the application process within a shorter timeframe. (B) Prior to submitting a formal application for review and approval under these provisions, the applicant and county staff shall meet to discuss the requirements of this section. The purpose of the meeting is to obtain a mutual understanding of the application requirements and process. The applicant is encouraged to submit information on the scope and nature of the proposal to allow staff to become familiar with the proposal in advance of this meeting. (C) Any application to rezone land to the PTD designation, shall constitute an amendment to the zoning ordinance pursuant to Section 30-14. The written and graphic information submitted by the applicant as part of the application process shall constitute proffers pursuant to Section 30-15 of this ordinance. Once the Board of Supervisors has approved the final master plan, all accepted proffers shall constitute conditions pursuant to Section 30-15. (D) To initiate an amendment, the applicant shall complete a rezoning application packet. This information shall be accompanied by graphic and written information, which shall constitute a preliminary master plan. All information submitted shall be of sufficient clarity and scale to clearly and accurately identify the location, nature, and character of the proposed district. At a minimum this information shall include: 1. A legal description and plat showing the site boundaries, and existing street lines, lot lines, and easements. 2. Existing zoning, land use and ownership of each parcel proposed for the district. 3. A general statement of planning objectives to be achieved by the PTD district, including a description of the character of the proposed development, the existing and proposed ownership of the site, the market for which the development is oriented, and objectives towards any specific human -made and natural characteristics located on the site. 4. A description and analysis of existing site conditions, including information on topography, historic resources, natural water courses, floodplains, unique natural features, tree cover areas, known archeological resources, etc. 5. The proposed conceptual location for each type of land use of the proposed development. 6. The gross square footage for each use type proposed in the PTD. 7. The proposed size, location and use of other portions of the tract, including landscaping and parking. 8. Reserved: A conceptual traffic and parcelization plan. Reserved 10. The proposed schedule of site development. At a minimum, the schedule should include an approximate commencement date for construction and a proposed build -out period. 11. Generalized statements pertaining to architectural design principles and guidelines shall be submitted in sufficient detail to provide information on building designs, orientations, styles, lighting plans, signage plans, landscaping, etc. (E) The completed rezoning application and supporting preliminary Master Plan materials shall be submitted to the Planning Commission for review and analysis. The Commission shall review this information and make a report of its findings to the Board of Supervisors. The Commission shall as part of its review hold a public hearing pursuant to Section 15.1- 431 of the Code of Virginia, as amended. The proposed district shall be posted with signs indicating the date and time of the Commission public hearing. (F) The Commission shall make a report of its findings to the Board of Supervisors within 90 days of the receipt of the materials, unless the applicant requests, or agrees to an extension of this time frame. The Commission's report shall recommend approval, approval with modifications, or disapproval of the preliminary master plan. Failure of the Commission to make a report of its findings to the Board of Supervisors within this period shall constitute a Commission recommendation of approval. (G) If the Commission recommends denial of the preliminary Master Plan, or approval with modification, the applicant shall, if requested, have 60 days to make any modifications. If the applicant desires to make any modifications to the preliminary Master Plan, the Board of Supervisor's review and action shall be delayed until such changes are made and submitted for review. (H) The Board of Supervisors shall review the preliminary Master Plan, and after holding a public hearing act to approve or deny the plan within 90 days. Approval of the preliminary Master Plan shall constitute acceptance of the plan's provisions and concepts as proffers pursuant to Section 30-15 of this ordinance. The Plan approved by the Board of Supervisors shall constitute the final Master Plan for the PTD. Once approved by the Board of Supervisors, the Administrator shall authorize the revisions to the official zoning map to indicate the establishment of the PTD district. Sec. 30-63-7 Revisions to Final Master Plan (A) Major revisions to the final Master Plan shall be reviewed and approved following the procedures and requirements of Section 30-63-6. Major revisions include, but are not limited to changes such as: 1. Any significant increase in the density of the development; 2. Substantial change in circulation or access; 10. The proposed schedule of site development. At a minimum, the schedule should include an approximate commencement date for construction and a proposed build -out period. 11. Generalized statements pertaining to architectural design principles and guidelines shall be submitted in sufficient detail to provide information on building designs, orientations, styles, lighting plans, signage plans, landscaping, etc. (E) The completed rezoning application and supporting preliminary Master Plan materials shall be submitted to the Planning Commission for review and analysis. The Commission shall review this information and make a report of its findings to the Board of Supervisors. The Commission shall as part of its review hold a public hearing pursuant to Section 15.1- 431 of the Code of Virginia, as amended. The proposed district shall be posted with signs indicating the date and time of the Commission public hearing. The Commission shall make a report of its findings to the Board of Supervisors within 90 days of the receipt of the materials, unless the applicant requests, or agrees to an extension of this time frame. The Commission's report shall recommend approval, approval with modifications, or disapproval of the preliminary master plan. Failure of the Commission to make a report of its findings to the Board of Supervisors within this period shall constitute a Commission recommendation of approval. (F) (G) If the Commission recommends denial of the preliminary Master Plan, or approval with modification, the applicant shall, if requested, have 60 days to make any modifications. If the applicant desires to make any modifications to the preliminary Master Plan, the Board of Supervisor's review and action shall be delayed until such changes are made and submitted for review. (H) The Board of Supervisors shall review the preliminary Master Plan, and after holding a public hearing act to approve or deny the plan within 90 days. Approval of the preliminary Master Plan shall constitute acceptance of the plan's provisions and concepts as proffers pursuant to Section 30-15 of this ordinance. The Plan approved by the Board of Supervisors shall constitute the final Master Plan for the PTD. Once approved by the Board of Supervisors, the Administrator shall authorize the revisions to the official zoning map to indicate the establishment of the PTD district. Sec. 30-63-7 Revisions to Final Master Plan (A) Major revisions to the final Master Plan shall be reviewed and approved following the procedures and requirements of Section 30-63-6. Major revisions include, but are not limited to changes such as: 1. Any significant increase in the density of the development; 2. Substantial change in circulation or access; (B) 3. Substantial change in grading or utility provisions; 4. Substantial changes in the mixture of land uses; 5. Substantial change in architectural or site design features of the development; 6. Any other change that the Administrator finds is a major divergence from the approved final master plan. All other changes in the final Master Plan shall be considered minor amendments. The Administrator, upon receipt of a written request of the owner, may approve such minor amendments. 1. If the Administrator fails to act on a request for a minor amendment to the Master Plan within 15 calendar days, it shall be considered approved. 2. A request which is disapproved by the Administrator shall be considered a major amendment and shall be subject to the approval process outlined above for such amendments. Sec. 30-63-8 Approval of Preliminary and Final Site Development Plans (A) Following the approval of the final Master Plan, the applicant or its authorized agent, shall be required to submit preliminary and final site development plans for approval. Final site development plans for any phase or component of the PTD that involves the construction of structures or facilities, shall be approved prior to the issuance of a building and zoning permit, and the commencement of construction. Standards for preliminary and final site development plans are found in a document entitled Land Development Procedures, available in the Department of Engineering and Inspections. (B) It is the intent of this section that subdivision review under the subdivision regulations be carried out simultaneously with the review of a planned industrial development under this section. The plans required under this section shall be submitted in a form which will satisfy the requirements of the subdivision regulations, as determined by the Administrator. (C) Preliminary and final site development plans submitted for review shall be in compliance with the final Master Plan approved by the Board of Supervisors. Roanoke County shall review and approve or disapprove any Final Site Development Plan within 60 days of its submittal. (D) No Planned Technology Development shall be approved and no work shall be authorized on construction until all property included in the final Master Plan is in common ownership. Sec. 30-63-9 Failure to Begin Development (A) Unless an extension is granted by the Administrator, failure of the applicant to submit a preliminary site development plan for at least one portion of the planned residential development within 36 months of the approval of the final Master Plan, shall constitute an application on the part of applicant to rezone the PTD to the district designations in effect prior to the approval of the final Master Plan. Sec. 30-63-10 Control Following Approval of Final Development Plans (A) The zoning administrator shall periodically inspect the site and review all building permits issued for the development to ensure that the development is in general compliance with the submitted schedule. (Amended Ord. 92794-17) COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 5204 Bernard Dr.•._ P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 ( 540' 772-2068 FAX (540 1 772-2108 For staff use only F dater ceived•" received application fee: PC/BZA daze: y/7i1/� . placards issued: BOS,date: Case Number: /f ^ �� 9 '/ t Check type of application filed (check all that apply): 7 REZONING ❑ SPECIAL USE ❑ VARIANCE Applicant's name: Elmer C. Hodge, Administrator Address: County of Roanoke P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA Phone:772-2004 Zip Code: 24018 Owner's name: County of Roanoke Address: (Same as above) Phone: Zip Code: Location of property: 5300 block of Glenmary Drive Tax Map Number: 54.00-1-2,3 / 64.00-1-1 Magisterial District: Catawba Community Planning Area: Glenvar Size of parcel (s): 456.6 acres sq.ft. Existing Zoning: R-1 Existing Land Use: Agricultural • Proposed Zoning: Planned Technology Development District (PTD) Proposed Land Use: Business and Commercial Park as specified in the Concept Plan For Staff Use Cr y Use Type: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES X NO IF NO, A VAFIA.,NCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES x NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proff=r_cf with this request? YES NO Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in cr Cer to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. RIS V Consultation Application Justification w3 V EliglZET 8 1 /2" x 1 i" concept plan Metes and bounds description Water and sewer application IRIS V NY OF Application fee Proffers, if applicable Adjoining property owners / hereby certify that / am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge andensent of th-wner. Owner's Signature: �� F CORPORATE TECHNOLOGY PARK REZONING REQUEST OCTOBER 24, 1997 Executive Summary This report is a request to rezone the former Glenn -Mary Farm Site to a Planned Technology Development district (PTD) to support the development of the Corporate Technology Park. The park will contain four major districts: Corporate Village District A village center with businesses, support services, and commercial buildings Corporate Circle District Corporate buildings with select commercial business ventures adjacent to the Corporate Village Technology District Progressive R&D and technological manufacturing entities which encircle the Corporate Village and Corporate Circle Lone Eagle District Residential and commercial mix for self-employed or limited small business endeavors A Preliminary Concept Plan for the site was developed by the citizens and staff in a five month Community Visioning Process under the facilitation of a Design Team of architects and engineers. Concurrently, the Design Team used the same five. months to qualify the site. Copies of the subconsultants reports are included in the. attachments. A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment found no -major environmental obstacles to the purchase and development of the land. A Preliminary Subsurface Exploration Report determined the site suitable for development and that costs should be "normal" in the areas investigated. Adequate public water and sewer facilities exist, or are planned to be extended, at locations near the boundary of the site. A preliminary review of current and proposed stormwater, runoff impacts and water quality issues was conducted. With proper design, stormwater management and flow quantity can be controlled while the established stream ecosystem and drainage pattern can be utilized to lessen the impact of thermal loading and achieve some natural water quality management. The property is completely surrounded by a minimum 100' landscape buffer that will provide screening for adjoining residential neighborhoods. A Phase I Archeological study of the site was performed to identify historical resources. Several test digs revealed some artifacts with one area is eligible to receive further research if warranted by the State of Virginia. A preliminary traffic study focused on the alternative access road options, traffic projections, and existing road upgrades as a result of the projected traffic counts and safety concerns. 7 Executive Summary Page Two The Corporate Technology Park's preliminary concept plan and design guidelines incorporate innovative and site responsive development methods. It allows the opportunity to develop a carefully crafted and rigorously controlled business park which protects and enhances natural resources, while facilitating high -quality, leading edge, mixed use development. Corporate Technology Park will provide Roanoke County the opportunity to become a part of the technological growth of this portion of the state. fie G1 3'1vdi i t 1141Y+ . • 7iL l 1. i ` �lqV Jkk f, Mp1mp} 2. This Flan is sc. rt� 1)3 4 er" a • ?V.•,; , • DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING Glenmary Drive Site Tax Map Numbers #54.00-1-2,3 #64.00-1-1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998 ORDINANCE 032498-7 TO VACATE AND RELEASE PROPERTY INTERESTS CONVEYED TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS IN CONNECTION WITH ROADS, STREETS, ALLEYS, RIGHTS -OF -WAY, AND PUBLIC ACCESS IN AND AROUND PINKARD COURT SUBDIVISION WHEREAS, by instruments dated March 19, 1983, and March 1, 1985, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 1221, page 1410, and Deed Book 1221, page 1413, respectively, the owners of properties bordering on each side of Washington Road along the southwestern boundary of Pinkard Court Subdivision executed their consent to give unto Roanoke County, without compensation, each as to the lands by him owned, an easement and right-of-way for said road/street to be 40 feet in width, including an additional 10' strip along the southwest side of Washington Road, together with such additional widths as may be necessary for slopes, ditches and drainage facilities, in order for said road to be established as a part of the state secondary road system; and, WHEREAS, by instruments dated March 19, 1983, and March 1, 1985, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 1221, page 1407, and Deed Book 1221, page 1404, respectively, the owners of properties bordering on each side of the portion of Valley Avenue beginning about .02 miles southwest of Booker Road and extending in a southwesterly direction about .05 mile to Washington Road in Pinkard Court Subdivision, executed their consent to give unto Roanoke County, without compensation, each as to the lands by him owned, an easement and right-of-way for said road/street to be 40 feet in width, including an additional 7.5 feet on each side of the designated portion of Valley Avenue, together with such additional widths as may be necessary for slopes, ditches and drainage facilities, in order for said road to be established as a part of the state secondary road system; and, WHEREAS, by instrument dated January 19, 1985, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 1221, page 1416, the owners of properties bordering on each side of the portion of Pinkard Street (also known as Pinkard Avenue), extending from Booker Road (Route 878) in a southwesterly direction about .05 mile to a new turn -around, in Pinkard Court Subdivision, executed their consent to give unto Roanoke County, without compensation, each as to the lands by him owned, an easement and right-of-way for said road/street to be 40 feet in width, including an arc of land on each side of Pinkard Street for the cul-de-sac, together with such additional widths as may be necessary for slopes, ditches and drainage facilities, in order for said road to be established as a part of the state secondary road system; and, WHEREAS, by deed dated September 2, 1996, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 1531, page 1154, Dennis E. Phelps, et als, conveyed fee simple title to a 0.037 acre of land, being the northwesterly portion of Lot 4, Block 4, Pinkard Court Subdivision, to the Board of Supervisors for right-of-way and easement in connection with the improvement and acceptance of Pinkard Street into the state secondary road system; and, WHEREAS, by deed of easement dated January 15, 1974, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 988, page 811, Thomas M. Davis, Jr., and Carolyn 2 C. Davis granted and conveyed for the use of the general public a perpetual easement for foot and vehicle traffic over, across and upon a new 16' alley through Lots 27, 22, and 21, in Block 1, of Pinkard Court Subdivision, together with an easement for such drainage ditches as are necessary to drain any road established across said alley, said easements being to replace the alleys vacated by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors by Ordinance adopted on December 11, 1973, all as shown on a plat attached to said deed of easement; and, WHEREAS, by deed dated November 21, 1949, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 429, page 31, W. M. Jernigan, Jr., and Vala Jernigan, husband and wife, conveyed unto the State of Virginia a twelve -foot (12') strip of land along the southerly side of Lot 12, Section 1, Pinkard Court, and by deed dated December 8, 1949, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 429, page 33, Joseph W. Nackley conveyed unto the Commonwealth of Virginia a twelve -foot (12') strip of land along the southerly side of Lot 13, Section 1, Pinkard Court, said conveyances being adjacent to, and parallel with Summit Avenue and for purposes of widening Summit Avenue on the northerly side thereof; and, WHEREAS, due to the proposed acquisition and development of the lots in Pinkard Court Subdivision and surrounding properties, and in view of the vacation of the public rights -of -way shown on the plat of Pinkard Court Subdivision in Plat Book 1, Page 363, by Ordinance #021098-9 adopted by the Board of Supervisors on February 10, 1998, and the abandonment of those sections of said rights -of -way in the state secondary road system by Resolution #021098-8, the Board deems the above -described real estate interests no 3 longer necessary for the County or for the public, and the County has no current or future use for these interests. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance. A first reading of this ordinance was held on March 10, 1998; and a second reading was held on March 24, 1998; and, 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the real estate interests hereinabove described are hereby declared to be surplus, and the nature of said interests render them unacceptable and unavailable for other public uses; and, 3. That, subject to the conditions contained in Paragraph 7, all right, title and interest acquired by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, by instruments dated March 19, 1983, and March 1, 1985, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 1221, page 1410, and Deed Book 1221, page 1413, respectively, for Washington Road, by instruments dated March 19, 1983, and March 1, 1985, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 1221, page 1407, and Deed Book 1221, page 1404, respectively, for Valley Avenue, and by instrument dated January 19, 1985, and recorded in Deed Book 1221, page 1416, for Pinkard Street (also known as Pinkard Avenue), be, and hereby is, vacated and released; and, 4 4. That, subject to the conditions contained in Paragraph 7, the northwesterly portion of Lot 4, Block 4, Pinkard Court, consisting of 0.037 acre, be, and hereby is, vacated and released as a right-of-way and easement for acceptance of Pinkard Street into the secondary road system, and the County Administrator or any Assistant County Administrator is hereby authorized to re -convey said parcel to the owner of Lot 4, Block 4, Pinkard Court, as of the time such conveyance is made, said parcel to be added and combined with Lot 4, by deed or by plat, in compliance with the Roanoke County Subdivision Ordinances, and other applicable laws and regulations; and, 5. That, subject to the conditions contained in Paragraph 7, the new 16' alley through Lots 27, 22 and 21, in Block 1, Pinkard Court, conveyed as a perpetual easement for use of the general public by deed of easement dated January 15, 1974, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 988, page 811, be and hereby is, vacated and released; and, 6. That, subject to the conditions contained in Paragraph 7, all right, title and interest of the County or the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, which may have been acquired by virtue of the deeds dated November 21, 1949, and December 8, 1949, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 429, page 31, and Deed Book 429, page 33, respectively, for the widening of Summit Avenue be, and hereby is, vacated and released; and, 7. That this ordinance shall be subject to the following conditions: a. That fee simple title to all of the Tots in Pinkard Court Subdivision as shown on Plat Book 1, Page 363 (except Lots 1, 2, and 3 in Block 1 5 which are not affected by this action), to a parcel of land currently owned by Rowena P. Jernigan (Deed Book 1288, Page 803) designated on the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map No. 87.08-3-1, and to a parcel of land consisting of 21.686 acres, more or less, and being a portion of a tract of land currently owned by Craighead Real Estate (Deed Book 1388, Page 1311; Will Book 44, Page 1447) designated on the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map No. 77.20-1-42 and a portion of Tax Map No. 77.20-1-43, shall be acquired by Interstate Development, L.L.C., or its assignee (Lowe's Companies, Inc.), in one common ownership and all of said lots or parcels shall be added and combined into one tract or parcel of land, with other parcels added if necessary or desired, within four months from the date of the adoption of this ordinance. b. That a new public right-of-way from Franklin Road (Route 220) and extending to Washington Avenue be dedicated and the appropriate guarantee be provided to the County of Roanoke for the construction of the new road to the standards required by the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) and for VDOT acceptance of the new road into the state secondary road system. c. That all costs and expenses associated herewith, including but not limited to publication, survey and recordation costs, shall be the responsibility of Interstate Development, L.L.C., or its assignee (Lowe's Companies, Inc.); and, 8. That the County Administrator or any Assistant County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such other documents and take such further actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the vacation, release and relinquishment of said property interests, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 9. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. HoltoiY, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Vickie L. Huffman, Assistant County Attorney Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections ACTION NO. ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 24, 1998 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE TO VACATE AND RELEASE PROPERTY INTERESTS CONVEYED TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS IN CONNECTION WITH ROADS, STREETS, ALLEYS, RIGHTS -OF -WAY, AND PUBLIC ACCESS IN AND AROUND PINKARD COURT SUBDIVISION COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This is the second reading of the proposed ordinance to vacate and release, and re - convey where applicable, several real estate interests conveyed to the Board of Supervisors in connection with the roads, streets, alleys, rights -of -way and public access in and adjoining the Pinkard Court Subdivision. These interests were created by recorded instruments, separate from the subdivision plat, as more specifically set forth in the proposed ordinance. BACKGROUND: On February 10, 1998, the Board of Supervisors adopted Ordinance #021098-9 to vacate and close the public rights -of -way and alleys in Pinkard Court Subdivision, and also adopted Resolution #021098-8 to abandon the secondary roads in the subdivision. The developer of the proposed site, Lowe's Companies, Inc., has proceeded as planned with the steps necessary to finalize the property acquisitions in this area. Title searches on the properties have revealed a number of recorded instruments conveying, or purporting to convey, easements for right-of-way, a parcel for right-of-way, and an alley, all of which are related to the roads and access in Pinkard Court, but are separate from and in addition to the public rights -of -way shown on the subdivision plat and vacated by the plat pursuant to §15.2-2272 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended). The parties involved have requested that the Board vacate and release these interests in order to clear up any title defects or encumbrances that may exist as a result. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: In connection with a County project to improve the Pinkard Court roads for acceptance into the state secondary road system, a series of documents (referred to as omnibus deeds) were executed by the property owners along Washington Road, a portion of Valley Avenue, and a portion of Pinkard Street (a/k/a Pinkard Avenue). The owners consented to give to the County an easement for right-of-way for the road/street to be forty feet (40') in width, together with such additional widths as may be necessary for the extension and maintenance of road slopes, ditches, and all necessary drainage facilities. A copy of the map attached to some of these documents is attached hereto as Exhibit A. Although these agreements do not contain outright conveyances, they do create a potential encumbrance on the property titles. The Board is being requested to vacate and release any right, title and interest it may have acquired by virtue of these agreements. In 1996, with further road improvement efforts, the County acquired in fee simple a parcel of land containing 0.037 acre, being part of Lot 4, Block 4, in Pinkard Court, from Dennis E. Phelps, et als. This acquisition was for right-of-way and easement purposes, namely construction of a cul-de-sac on Pinkard Street. A copy of the map is attached hereto as Exhibit B. With the proposed development and vacation of the roads, the cul-de- sac parcel is no longer necessary for road purposes, and since its size and location render it unacceptable and unavailable for other public uses, staff recommends reconveyance of the parcel to the property owner. Another title issue arose with a 16' alley conveyed to the general public for use as a perpetual easement for foot and vehicle traffic across Lots 27, 22 and 21, in Block 1 of Pinkard Court. This conveyance was made as an alternative to the previously existing portion of alleyways vacated the Board on December 11, 1973. A copy of the plat, showing the vacated and new alleys, is attached hereto as Exhibit C. As with the roads and other alleys in the subdivision, the alley will not be required by the property owners in Pinkard Court or the general public, and will serve no public purpose; the Board is requested to vacate and release the public interest in this portion of alleyway not shown on the original plat. Also, in 1949, the owners of Lots 12 and 13 in Block 1, of Pinkard Court Subdivision conveyed twelve -foot strips of land along the southerly side of said lots for the widening of Summit Avenue. The conveyances were made to the State/Commonwealth of Virginia, rather than the County. The County is, however, being requested to vacate and release any right, title and interest it may have in these strips of land. Summit Avenue is undeveloped and closed, and with the proposed development of this area, the 12' strips serve no public purpose. 2 FISCAL IMPACTS: None STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt the proposed ordinance to vacate and release the respective property interests, and re -convey the property to the owner where appropriate, in connection with the roads, streets, rights -of -way, and public access in and around Pinkard Court Subdivision, subject to the conditions set forth in said ordinance. Respectfully submitted, MO, Vicltie L. Huffman Assistant County Attorney ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: Denied ( ) Harrison Received ( ) Johnson Referred McNamara to Minnix Nickens 3 No Yes Abs Q95 N ` • f ��-���-JJJJ _ Q °D g� 103 22 g iv.)107.33 f p� • 0" I 11144 0. • h 115 55 p•er. b 119.66 PO VI' • 1 Z 12377 v' L. • 12788 ttr)* 9 131.99 Meadowview Road 125 0 .• �� b �p• 2 `SA) • 125 f 45 2 it.' irilill ilA 3,— • moo 49 125. :0 6:: 'V OS f le —Ca el ' 125ot Exhibit A BK 1531PG 01159 METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT REPRESENT A. COMPOSITE OF DEEDS, PLATS, AND CALCULATED INFORMATION AND DO NOT REFLECT AN ACCURATE BOUNDARY SURVEY. TAX MAP No. 87.08-1-61 PERPETUAL RIGHT—OF—WAY & EASEMENT (0.037 Ac.) PROPERTY OF DONALD ROOSEVELT MUSE TAX MAP No. 87.08-1-64 TAX MAP NO. 87.08-1-62 PINKARD CT. LOT 5 & 4 REMAINING PROPERTY OF DENNIS E. & SANDRA P. PHELPS P.B.1 PG.363 SCALE: 1 "=20' PLAT SHOWING PERPETUAL RIGHT & EASEMENT BEING CONVEYED TO ROANOKE COUNTY BY - DENNIS E. & SANDRA P. PHELPS PREPARED BY: ROANOKE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT REVISED 10-12-95 DATE• 10-07-92 Exhibit B B/N!%//VG VOX 988 Pl.'e814 cu.asi •wu 1i44.4.41 4ic. 1 P•x✓_�g(rwti y r-; n.s 4. y 'rt1�=4..• �Je 17���**4.4 J,.S.re. .rtait .i:ss;_a-..4'41.ul• . .t';S1l•tl.:�: 1Lo.•� ,iSlt=�ii••siu' 1.4.0.rlf is.*4, 'o.'4Sf.': .._ l:r • ... ii•1 4.n/•1 tf, 4 f)•//•, .s�.`I 2 i!S/ li.ea 7,•1e4 4e..o /59./5",0 /Nl/wn Ro.on 7 22 • 21 :� • L7:1 l: 0 Nit / .Lsr—j .). (Ca!':C41[ t:J. AC "1J 1„I1 44,• .PE1//SfL7 05C. 8, /973 454/ }2-t,27 .t!/Je'lei.•. }}_3 •t.Pii.�4_.>_sif.*_Qdc! tLJ- 22./2 ./.2. ! 7 • •!2 oit-Ir It. ! } $ai, rIA.94-A/•5/f!Pi d' 447.95r2 y,9• SEC -JAW ------ --- �� ALT PAVEMEiyr I ' 64 CE allow 6 7•r/.e'/f• 'VALLEY AV,- /9 /.sue _ .- �S.67'/2'►^:. — — /i736 •r —Tot. 6:l.ns • • `°+S7 /. ergo R/w'+' .C/.vt / M. • N • 3 6 /24..43' S74'34•w. 7 11 •1 4.2' - 1 °LQ7 ~cur foR THOMAS MARSHALL l7AV/S, d/.P. SNOWING P;00PtiSE1: Rf.000AT/ON Of /4'.9LLEY .sNn c.Cosmc.• of POR770N OF ALl Ers PrJRT/on/ OF v II A y' AVE. A/n.64 LOTS /-S, 2/, 22, 271 2e, BLoar 4 P///KARC, Cnu.cT /20/9NOKE CO. w,QG/N/A 47x. 4.7.7vten nic t-_14Asso c/ATcs fvccs /J.g.WVS nATE. Olc. yc j ,.9Ts SCALE : /^' - 4-0' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998 ORDINANCE TO VACATE AND RELEASE PROPERTY INTERESTS CONVEYED TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS IN CONNECTION WITH ROADS, STREETS, ALLEYS, RIGHTS -OF -WAY, AND PUBLIC ACCESS IN AND AROUND PINKARD COURT SUBDIVISION WHEREAS, by instruments dated March 19, 1983, and March 1, 1985, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 1221, page 1410, and Deed Book 1221, page 1413, respectively, the owners of properties bordering on each side of Washington Road along the southwestern boundary of Pinkard Court Subdivision executed their consent to give unto Roanoke County, without compensation, each as to the lands by him owned, an easement and right-of-way for said road/street to be 40 feet in width, including an additional 10' strip along the southwest side of Washington Road, together with such additional widths as may be necessary for slopes, ditches and drainage facilities, in order for said road to be established as a part of the state secondary road system; and, WHEREAS, by instruments dated March 19, 1983, and March 1, 1985, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 1221, page 1407, and Deed Book 1221, page 1404, respectively, the owners of properties bordering on each side of the portion of Valley Avenue beginning about .02 miles southwest of Booker Road and extending in a southwesterly direction about .05 mile to Washington Road in Pinkard Court Subdivision, executed their consent to give unto Roanoke County, without compensation, each as to the lands by him owned, an easement and right-of-way for said road/street to be 40 feet in width, including an additional 7.5 feet on each side of the designated portion of Valley Avenue, together with such additional widths as may be necessary for slopes, ditches and drainage facilities, in order for said road to be established as a part of the state secondary road system; and, WHEREAS, by instrument dated January 19, 1985, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 1221, page 1416, the owners of properties bordering on each side of the portion of Pinkard Street (also known as Pinkard Avenue), extending from Booker Road (Route 878) in a southwesterly direction about .05 mile to a new turn- around, in Pinkard Court Subdivision, executed their consent to give unto Roanoke County, without compensation, each as to the lands by him owned, an easement and right-of-way for said road/street to be 40 feet in width, including an arc of land on each side of Pinkard Street for the cul-de-sac, together with such additional widths as may be necessary for slopes, ditches and drainage facilities, in order for said road to be established as a part of the state secondary road system; and, WHEREAS, by deed dated September 2, 1996, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 1531, page 1154, Dennis E. Phelps, et a1s, conveyed fee simple title to a 0.037 acre of land, being the northwesterly portion of Lot 4, Block 4, Pinkard Court Subdivision, to the Board of Supervisors for right-of-way and easement in connection with the improvement and acceptance of Pinkard Street into the state secondary road system; and, WHEREAS, by deed of easement dated January 15, 1974, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 988, page 811, Thomas M. Davis, Jr., and Carolyn C. Davis granted and conveyed for the use of the general public a perpetual easement for 2 foot and vehicle traffic over, across and upon a new 16' alley through Lots 27, 22, and 21, in Block 1, of Pinkard Court Subdivision, together with an easement for such drainage ditches as are necessary to drain any road established across said alley, said easements being to replace the alleys vacated by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors by Ordinance adopted on December 11, 1973, all as shown on a plat attached to said deed of easement; and, WHEREAS, by deed dated November 21, 1949, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 429, page 31, W. M. Jernigan, Jr., and Vala Jernigan, husband and wife, conveyed unto the State of Virginia a twelve -foot (12') strip of land along the southerly side of Lot 12, Section 1, Pinkard Court, and by deed dated December 8, 1949, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 429, page 33, Joseph W. Nackley conveyed unto the Commonwealth of Virginia a twelve -foot (12') strip of land along the southerly side of Lot 13, Section 1, Pinkard Court, said conveyances being adjacent to, and parallel with Summit Avenue and for purposes of widening Summit Avenue on the northerly side thereof; and, WHEREAS, due to the proposed acquisition and development of the lots in Pinkard Court Subdivision and surrounding properties, and in view of the vacation of the public rights -of -way shown on the plat of Pinkard Court Subdivision in Plat Book 1, Page 363, by Ordinance #021098-9 adopted by the Board of Supervisors on February 10, 1998, and the abandonment of those sections of said rights -of -way in the state secondary road system by Resolution #021098-8, the Board deems the above -described real estate interests no 3 longer necessary for the County or for the public, and the County has no current or future use for these interests. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance. A first reading of this ordinance was held on March 10, 1998; and a second reading was held on March 24, 1998; and, 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the real estate interests hereinabove described are hereby declared to be surplus, and the nature of said interests render them unacceptable and unavailable for other public uses; and, 3. That, subject to the conditions contained in Paragraph 7, all right, title and interest acquired by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, by instruments dated March 19, 1983, and March 1, 1985, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 1221, page 1410, and Deed Book 1221, page 1413, respectively, for Washington Road, by instruments dated March 19, 1983, and March 1, 1985, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 1221, page 1407, and Deed Book 1221, page 1404, respectively, for Valley Avenue, and by instrument dated January 19, 1985, and recorded in Deed Book 1221, page 1416, for Pinkard Street (also known as Pinkard Avenue), be, and hereby is, vacated and released; and, 4 4. That, subject to the conditions contained in Paragraph 7, the northwesterly portion of Lot 4, Block 4, Pinkard Court, consisting of 0.037 acre, be, and hereby is, vacated and released as a right-of-way and easement for acceptance of Pinkard Street into the secondary road system, and the County Administrator or any Assistant County Administrator is hereby authorized to re -convey said parcel to the owner of Lot 4, Block 4, Pinkard Court, as of the time such conveyance is made, said parcel to be added and combined with Lot 4, by deed or by plat, in compliance with the Roanoke County Subdivision Ordinances, and other applicable laws and regulations; and, 5. That, subject to the conditions contained in Paragraph 7, the new 16' alley through Lots 27, 22 and 21, in Block 1, Pinkard Court, conveyed as a perpetual easement for use of the general public by deed of easement dated January 15, 1974, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 988, page 811, be and hereby is, vacated and released; and, 6. That, subject to the conditions contained in Paragraph 7, all right, title and interest of the County or the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, which may have been acquired by virtue of the deeds dated November 21, 1949, and December 8, 1949, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 429, page 31, and Deed Book 429, page 33, respectively, for the widening of Summit Avenue be, and hereby is, vacated and released; and, 7. That this ordinance shall be subject to the following conditions: a. That fee simple title to all of the lots in Pinkard Court Subdivision as shown on Plat Book 1, Page 363 (except Lots 1, 2, and 3 in Block 1 5 which are not affected by this action), to a parcel of land currently owned by Rowena P. Jernigan (Deed Book 1288, Page 803) designated on the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map No. 87.08-3-1, and to a parcel of land consisting of 21.686 acres, more or less, and being a portion of a tract of land currently owned by Craighead Real Estate (Deed Book 1388, Page 1311; Will Book 44, Page 1447) designated on the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map No. 77.20-1-42 and a portion of Tax Map No. 77.20-1-43, shall be acquired by Interstate Development, L.L.C., or its assignee (Lowe's Companies, Inc.), in one common ownership and all of said lots or parcels shall be added and combined into one tract or parcel of land, with other parcels added if necessary or desired, within four months from the date of the adoption of this ordinance. b. That a new public right-of-way from Franklin Road (Route 220) and extending to Washington Avenue be dedicated and the appropriate guarantee be provided to the County of Roanoke for the construction of the new road to the standards required by the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) and for VDOT acceptance of the new road into the state secondary road system. c. That all costs and expenses associated herewith, including but not limited to publication, survey and recordation costs, shall be the 6 -- responsibility of Interstate Development, L.L.C., or its assignee (Lowe's Companies, Inc.); and, 8. That the County Administrator or any Assistant County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such other documents and take such further actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the vacation, release and relinquishment of said property interests, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 9. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. g:\attorney\vlh\pinkard.ord 7 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998 ORDINANCE 032498-8 AUTHORIZING APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY TO EXPAND THE USE OF AN EXISTING EASEMENT ACROSS A WELL LOT ON KENTLAND DRIVE OWNED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WHEREAS, by Deed of Easement dated May 3, 1950, Appalachian Electric Power Co. was granted an easement a distance of 1271 feet, more or Tess, and 100 feet in width by W. S. Phelps and Eula A. Phelps, his wife, recorded in the Clerk's Office of the County of Roanoke in Deed Book 437, page 147; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County is now the owner of a portion of the property formerly owned by W. S. Phelps and Eula A. Phelps and is designated as a well lot on Kentland Drive, Tax Map No. 76.12-8-25; and, WHEREAS, a portion of the easement granted to Appalachian Electric Power Co. (APCO) by W. S. Phelps and Eula A. Phelps crosses the County's well lot on Kentland Drive; and, WHEREAS, Appalachian Power Company (APCO) has requested authorization to expand the use of the existing easement across the well lot on Kentland Drive to allow a telecommunications antenna and related facilities of Ohio State Cellular Phone Company, Inc., to be located on an existing transmission line tower as shown on APCO Drawing No. R-3313, dated December 22, 1997. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance. A first reading of this ordinance was held on March 10, 1998; and a second reading was held on March 24, 1998. 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the interests in real estate to be conveyed are hereby declared to be surplus, and are hereby made available for other public uses by conveyance to Appalachian Power Company for the provision of electrical service in connection with installation of a telecommunications antenna and related facilities on an existing electric transmission line tower. 3. That the conveyance of the expanded use of the right-of-way for an underground service line(s) and related facilities to electric service for a telecommunications antenna, as shown on APCO Drawing No. R-3313, dated December 22, 1997, to Appalachian Power Company for the sum of Twelve Thousand Dollars ($12,000.00) is hereby authorized. 4. That the County Administrator or an Assistant County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such further actions as may be necessary to accomplish this conveyance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 5. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson 2 NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: /&€A4-e,A-, Brenda J. Holt n, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections :r EXISTING OVERHEAD LINE CORDELL DRIVE PROPOSED UNDERGROUND SERVICE US. CELLULAR METER TRANSMISSION TOWER 191 1 COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA T. D. 665000 MAP 3780-300 A4 ' 50' 100' _ 15' NORTHCROSS ROAD 15' EXISTING POLE 300-7271 FOXHALL CIR. APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY ON PROPERTY OF BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY DRAWN BY LMA (DATE APP. BY MJM SCALE SHEET 1 OF 1 12-22-97 AS SHOWN DRAWING NO. R-3313 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. e'° AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: MARCH 24, 1998 SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY TO EXPAND THE USE OF AN EXISTING EASEMENT ACROSS A WELL LOT ON KENTLAND DRIVE OWNED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: At the first reading of this ordinance on March 10, 1998, the Board directed the County Attorney to negotiate the payment of a reasonable sum of money for the use of this public property. After discussions with AEP and U. S. Cellular Corporation, U. S. Cellular agreed to purchase an easement from the County for telecommunications facilities for its subsidiary, Ohio State Cellular Phone Company, Inc. U. S. Cellular requested that this easement be conveyed to Appalachian Power Company. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Appalachian Power Company (APCO) has requested authorization to expand the use of an existing easement across a well lot on Kentland Drive to allow a telecommunications antenna and related facilities to be located on an existing transmission line tower as shown on APCO Drawing No. R-3313, dated December 22, 1997. County staff has reviewed the request and has determined that it does not interfere with the County's use of the property. FISCAL IMPACTS: Consideration for the proposed easement is the sum of $12,000.00. These proceeds will be deposited in the Utility Capital Facility Fund. ALTERNATIVES: (1) Adopt the proposed ordinance authorizing the County Administrator to execute the necessary documents for expansion of the use of the existing easement as shown on APCO Drawing No. R-3313, dated December 22, 1997, to Appalachian Power Company. (2) Decline to authorize donation or conveyance of the easement. Respectfully submitted, AM• ' 1 \ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney ACTION Approved ( ) Motion by: Denied ( ) Harrison Received ( ) Johnson Referred McNamara to Minnix Nickens c:\wp51\doc\agenda\apco\kendand.2nd VOTE No Yes Abs EXISTING OVERHEAD LINE CORDELL DRIVE PROPOSED UNDERGROUND SERVICE US. CELLULAR METER TRANSMISSION TOWER /9/ COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA T. D. 665000 MAP 3780-300 A4 0' 50' 100' 15' NORTHCR055 ROAD EXISTING POLE 300.222/ APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY ON PROPERTY OF BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY DRAWN BY LMA DATE 12-22-97 APP. BY MJM SCALE AS SHOWN SHEET 1 OF 1 DRAWING NO. R-3313 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY TO EXPAND THE USE OF AN EXISTING EASEMENT ACROSS A WELL LOT ON KENTLAND DRIVE OWNED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WHEREAS, by Deed of Easement dated May 3, 1950, Appalachian Electric Power Co. was granted an easement a distance of 1271 feet, more or less, and 100 feet in width by W. S. Phelps and Eula A. Phelps, his wife, recorded in the Clerk's Office of the County of Roanoke in Deed Book 437, page 147; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County is now the owner of a portion of the property formerly owned by W. S. Phelps and Eula A. Phelps and is designated as a well lot on Kentland Drive, Tax Map No. 76.12-8-25; and, WHEREAS, a portion of the easement granted to Appalachian Electric Power Co. (APCO) by W. S. Phelps and Eula A. Phelps crosses the County's well lot on Kentland Drive; and, WHEREAS, Appalachian Power Company (APCO) has requested authorization to expand the use of the existing easement across the well lot on Kentland Drive to allow a telecommunications antenna and related facilities of Ohio State Cellular Phone Company, Inc., to be located on an existing transmission line tower as shown on APCO Drawing No. R-3313, dated December 22, 1997. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance. A first reading of this ordinance was held on March 10, 1998; and a second reading was held on March 24, 1998. 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the interests in real estate to be conveyed are hereby declared to be surplus, and are hereby made available for other public uses by conveyance to Appalachian Power Company for the provision of electrical service in connection with installation of a telecommunications antenna and related facilities on an existing electric transmission line tower. 3. That the conveyance of the expanded use of the right-of-way for an underground service line(s) and related facilities to electric service for a telecommunications antenna, as shown on APCO Drawing No. R-3313, dated December 22, 1997, to Appalachian Power Company for the sum of Twelve Thousand Dollars ($12,000.00) is hereby authorized. 4. That the County Administrator or an Assistant County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such further actions as may be necessary to accomplish this conveyance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 5. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. c:\wp51\doc\agendAapcoVentland.or2 2 ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER H/-'2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 24, 1998 SUBJECT: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1 LEAGUE OF OLDER AMERICANS - ADVISORY COUNCIL The one year term of Dee Pincock will expire March 31, 1998. 2,. FIFTH PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION - STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CITIZENS' ADVISORY COMMITTEE Since Mr. Tobie Eaton has resigned, there is a vacancy on this committee. A citizen should be appointed who would be willing to serve in an advisory capacity in the efforts to implement the Roanoke Valley Regional Stormwater Management Plan. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: &AJ '4-6/10`)-- �/ Brenda J. olton Elmer C. Hodge Deputy Clerk County Administrator . ACTION VOTE No. Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by: Harrison Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) McNamara_ Referred ( ) Minnix _ To ( ) Nickens _ cc: File 2 r AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998 RESOLUTION 032498-9 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM I - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for March 24, 1998, designated as Item I- Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 4, inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of minutes - February 10, 1998, February 12, 1998, February 24, 1998 and March 10, 1998. 2. Confirmation of committee appointment to Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission. 3. Resolution requesting approval by the Virginia Department of Transportation of two proposed welcome signs and a landscaped planting area in the Clearbrook community within a public right of right in Roanoke County. 4. Request to donate a surplus water tank to Franklin County Parks & Recreation. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Consent Resolution with Item 9 1 added, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. H on, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning and Zoning Gary Robertson, Director, Utility 2 February 10, 1998 75 Roanoke County Administration Center 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 February 10, 1998 The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the second Tuesday, and the first regularly scheduled meeting of the month of February, 1998. N RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Johnson called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Bob L. Johnson, Vice Chairman Harry C. Nickens (Arrived 3:05 p.m.), Supervisors Fenton F. "Spike" Harrison, Joseph McNamara, H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney; Mary H. Allen, Clerk to the Board; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator; Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator; Anne Marie Green, Director, Community Relations IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES The invocation was given by Reverend James Ellis, Interim Minister, Colonial Avenue Baptist Church. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited by all present. February 10, 1998 77 their commitment to each other; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors extends its best wishes to the team, the coaches, and the school in their future endeavors. On motion of Supervisor Harrison to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None IN RE: NEW BUSINESS 1. Request to adopt a joint resolution for the expansion of the Roanoke Detention Center to become the Roanoke Valley Juvenile Detention Commission. (John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator) R-021098-2 Mr. Chambliss advised that the City of Salem and the Counties of Roanoke and Franklin jointly developed a needs assessment for a juvenile detention facility. During negotiations with the Department of Juvenile Justice, it was suggested that a joint resolution be adopted by the participating localities noting their intention to enter into an agreement to renovate, expand or use the Roanoke Detention Center for its own juvenile detention needs. Mr. Chambliss reported that Salem adopted the resolution on February 9, and Franklin County and the City of Roanoke will consider the resolution on February 17. He further reported that legislation has been introduced in the General Assembly to authorize the formation of a commission for the purpose of funding and/or operating the facility. In response to a question from Supervisor Minnix, Mr. Chambliss explained February 10, 1998 79 to reimburse the Commission for one half of the eligible construction costs of the Juvenile Detention Center. 3. That the County requests the Board of Juvenile Justice to approve the revised Program Design and Planning Study which will be submitted to the Board as a prerequisite to receiving approval for such reimbursement. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 2. Request to receive and appropriate Section 18 monies from the Department of Rail and Public Transportation for use by CORTRAN. (John Chambliss. Assistant County Administrator) A-021098-3 Mr. Chambliss reported that the County has applied for and received $13,778 from the Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation for the CORTRAN program to be used to assist in providing public transportation to the rural areas of the County. This is the same funding source that was used for the Red Line program that was discontinued last year. In response to questions, Mr. Chambliss explained that these funds would increase the CORTRAN budget to $83,000; and that there are currently about 600 to 650 passengers using CORTRAN. Supervisor Nickens requested information during the budget process on overall transportation costs including comparisons to the Red Line and Valley Metro and costs per trip. February 10, 1998 81 AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None RESOLUTION 021098-4 REQUESTING THE DIRECTOR OF THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND RECREATION TO DESIGNATE THE SOUTHWEST DISTRICT PARK AS A PUBLIC RECREATION AREA AND TO RECOMMEND TO THE COMMONWEALTH TRANSPORTATION BOARD THAT RECREATIONAL ACCESS FUNDS BE APPROVED FOR THIS PROJECT. WHEREAS, the Southwest District Park is to be developed by the Roanoke County Department of Parks and Recreation as a recreational facility serving the residents of Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, the facility is in need of adequate access; and WHEREAS, the procedure governing the allocation of recreational access funds as set forth in Section 33.1-223 of the Code of Virginia requires joint action by the Director of the Department of Conservation and Recreation and the Commonwealth Transportation Board; and WHEREAS, a statement of policy agreed upon between the said Director and Board approves the use of such funds for the construction of access roads to publicly - owned recreational areas; and WHEREAS, it appears to the Board that all requirements have been met to permit the Director of the Department of Conservation and Recreation to designate Southwest District Park as a public recreational facility and further permit the Commonwealth Transportation Board to provide funds for access to this public recreation area in accordance with Section 33.1-223 of the Code of Virginia; and WHEREAS, the right of way of the proposed access road is provided by the County of Roanoke at no cost to the Recreational Access Fund; and WHEREAS, the Board acknowledges that, pursuant to the provisions of Section 33.1-223 of the Code of Virginia, this road shall be designated a "Virginia Byway" and recommends the Commonwealth Transportation Board, in cooperation with the Director of the Department of Conservation and Recreation, take appropriate action to implement this designation. Further, the Board agrees, in keeping with the intent of Section 33.1-63 of the Code of Virginia, to use its good offices to reasonably protect the aesthetic or cultural value of this road. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke hereby requests the Director of the Department of Conservation and Recreation to designate the Southwest District Park as a public recreational area and to recommend to the Commonwealth Transportation Board that recreational access funds be allocated for an access road to serve said park; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Commonwealth Transportation Board is hereby requested to allocate the necessary recreational access funds to provide a February 10, 1998 83 Chairman Johnson will write letters of appreciation to Virginia Tech and area legislators thanking them for their assistance on this project. 2. First reading of ordinance amending Ordinance 121697-8 providing for the construction of and financing for a local public works improvement project - Richland Hills Drive Water Project. (Gary Robertson. Utility Director) Mr. Robertson advised that several years ago the County entered into an agreement with Roanoke College to extend water service to the Roanoke College Investment Corporation along Wildwood Road. Since that time residents in the Richland Hills Drive subdivision have also petitioned the County for water service. The Richland Hills Drive Water Project was approved by the Board at the December 16, 1997 meeting. The cost per participant was established at $4,500, and each property owner would make a $1,500 down payment with the County financing the remainder. Since that time, three property owners who wished to participate have encountered financial difficulty and requested that the County finance the entire $4,500 over ten years at 8% interest. Following discussion, Supervisor Harrison moved to approve the first reading and set the second reading for February 24, 1998. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None February 10, 1998 85 NAYS: None 4. First reading of ordinance accepting the donation of approximately three acres of real estate from the Commonwealth of Virginia, by its Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation to Roanoke County. located north and west of the Catawba Fire Station off Virginia Secondary Route 698. (Paul Mahoney. County Attorney) Mr. Mahoney advised that this ordinance authorizes the acceptance of a donation of 3 acres from the Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation to be added to the Catawba Fire Station which will provide for future expansions of the fire station and provide a lease site for a proposed cellular communications tower. According to old records, Catawba Hospital promised to convey the three acres to the County for fire station expansion. Mr. Mahoney explained that they still do not have the deed in hand but have been assured by the state that it is being circulated in Richmond for signatures. Supervisor Harrison moved to approve the first reading and set the second reading for February 24, 1998. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Harrison, Minnix, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None IN RE: APPOINTMENTS 1. Library Board and Social Service Advisory Board February 10, 1998 87 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the Consent Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None RESOLUTION 021098-5.a SUPPORTING LADEN COUNTY'S PROPOSAL THAT THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA PROVIDE ASSISTANCE FOR SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION AND RENOVATION PROJECTS. WHEREAS, Roanoke County has embarked upon a program of school construction and renovation projects totaling $120 million, and WHEREAS, by Resolution 011098-1, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors adopted a legislative program requesting that the General Assembly increase the funds available to the Literary Fund for local school capital construction or renovation projects and increase funding based upon the locality's local effort in support of these capital projects, and WHEREAS, the Laden County Board of Supervisors has endorsed a proposal that would provide for a 50% state reimbursement to localities for school construction and renovation, and WHEREAS, the proposal provides for the Commonwealth to reimburse localities for one-half of the capital costs of a school construction, enlargement, or renovation project based on State standards, and WHEREAS, site acquisition, site development, furnishing, fixtures, and facilities exceeding the state standards would not be included in the reimbursement formula. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia supports the Laden County Board of Supervisors in its efforts to establish a program that would provide for a percentage State reimbursement to localities for school construction and renovation projects. FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County directs that copies of this resolution be forwarded to the members of the General Assembly representing the Roanoke Valley and to the Laden County Board of Supervisors. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None RESOLUTION 021098-5.c RESCINDING CERTAIN POLICIES PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WITHIN THE DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING AND INSPECTIONS, AND TO February 10, 1998 89 that this work session will be held on February 24, 1998. IN RE: REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Request for Public Hearings on February 24. 1998 to (a) set the real estate. machinery and tools, and personal property tax rates., (b) Effective tax rate increase due to reassessments: and (c) public comment on the upcoming FY 1998-1999 budget. (Brent Robertson. Budget Manager) Supervisor Nickens moved to set the public hearings for February 24, 1998. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None IN RE: REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS Supervisor McNamara: (1) He asked for a report on possible disaster programs that could aid the residents of Bent Mountain who experienced damage from the recent storms. Chief Rick Burch, Fire & Rescue, advised that there were no programs available except for private or volunteer assistance because the area was not declared a disaster area by the state or federal government. Supervisor Minnix: (1) He expressed concern regarding the proposed rate increases by Cox Cable and noted that there had been three increases in the past several February 10, 1998 91 IN RE: WORK SESSION 1. Budget Work Session a. Revenue projections b. Mid -year expenditures c. Capital Improvement Program summary The work session was held from 4:20 p.m. until 4:50 p.m. Budget Manager Brent Robertson reported on the first six months expenditures of the County operating units, revenue projections for fiscal year 1997-1998 and 1998-99, and a general summary. He explained that the revenue projections have been reviewed by a Revenue Team consisting of the County Administrator, Assistant County Administrators, Commissioner of Revenue, Treasurer and staff from the Budget Office, Finance, Economic Development and Utilities. Supervisor Johnson requested figures on the 1996 actual budget and 1998 projected budget for the County Garage. Supervisor Nickens asked for a report on the number of residents who met with the real estate assessors to discuss their real estate taxes. It was the consensus of the Board to separate out the personal property revenue categories of vehicle taxes and machinery and tools taxes. Supervisor Nickens asked for consideration of a drop-off box being located at the Division of Motor Vehicles to pay taxes and bills. IN RE: TOUR OF NEW PROJECTS IN EAST ROANOKE COUNTY February 10, 1998 93 AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Harrison, Minnix, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None RESOLUTION 021098-6 CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Certification Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None IN RE: PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Resolution of Appreciation upon the retirement of David L. Miller, Sheriffs Office. R-021098-7 Chairman Johnson presented the resolution to David Miller. Supervisor Nickens moved to adopt the resolution. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson February 10, 1998 95 Mr. Covey reported that on November 18, 1997, staff submitted a report to the Board requesting authorization to give notice to the Commonwealth Transportation Board to proceed with the abandonment of the streets in the Pinkard Court Subdivision. After receiving approval, Mr. Covey notified the Department of Transportation of the County's intention to abandon the streets and received a response that the Department had no objection to the abandonment Mr. Covey explained that this action does not require a public hearing but staff decided to advertise a public hearing to give ample opportunity for citizen input. If the Board approves the resolution, it will be forwarded to the Commonwealth Transportation Board on February 16, and the process will be completed 30 days earlier than originally planned. There were no citizens to speak, and Supervisor Minnix moved to adopt the resolution. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None RESOLUTION 021098-8 TO ABANDON PUBLIC STREETS OF VIRGINIA SECONDARY ROUTES, A PORTION OF ROUTE 862 (VALLEY AVENUE), ROUTE 876 (MEADOW VIEW ROAD), ROUTE 877 (PINKARD AVENUE) AND ROUTE 878 (BOOKER ROAD), PINKARD COURT SUBDIVISION IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, a public notice was posted as prescribed under §33.1-151, Code of Virginia, announcing a public hearing to receive comments concerning abandoning the sections of roads described below from the secondary system of state highways, and WHEREAS, the Commissioner of the Virginia Department of Transportation was provided the prescribed notice of this Board's intent to abandon the subject sections of roads, and WHEREAS, after considering all evidence available, this Board is satisfied February 10, 1998 97 ways and alleys with the condition that the vacation does not become effective until the new public right-of-way plat from Franklin Road to Washington Avenue is approved, and the appropriate guarantee is provided for VDOT acceptance. Supervisor Minnix moved to adopt the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ORDINANCE 021098-9 VACATING AND CLOSING AS PUBLIC RIGHTS - OF -WAY A PORTION OF VALLEY AVENUE, ALL OF PINKARD AVENUE, MEADOW VIEW ROAD, BOOKER ROAD, AND SUMMIT AVENUE, AND ALL ALLEYS IN PINKARD COURT SUBDIVISION SHOWN IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 363. WHEREAS, the Petitioners, residents and Interstate Development, L.L.C., optionee on the properties, in Pinkard Court Subdivision as shown on the "Map of Pinkard Court" of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County in Plat Book 1, Page 363, have proposed the sale and acquisition of the Tots in said subdivision for development of a Lowe's retail business in the County of Roanoke; and, WHEREAS, the Petitioners have requested that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, vacate and close as public rights -of -way a portion of Valley Avenue, all of Pinkard Avenue, Meadow View Road, Booker Road and Summit Avenue, and all alleys, in Pinkard Court Subdivision, said roads, streets and alleys having been created and shown on the "Map of Pinkard Court" recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 363; and, WHEREAS, §15.2-2272.2 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended) requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by §15.2-2204 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), and the first reading of this ordinance was held on January 27, 1998; the public hearing and second reading of this ordinance was held on February 10, 1998. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the public rights -of -way, situate in the Cave Spring Magisterial District of Roanoke County, shown and cross -hatched on Exhibit A attached hereto, and referenced as a portion of Valley Avenue (Route 862), from .03 miles west from its February 10, 1998 99 e. That all costs and expenses associated herewith, includ ng but not limited to publication, survey and recordation costs, shall be the responsibility of Interstate Development, L.L.C., or its assignee (Lowe's Companies, Inc.); and, 2. That the County Administrator, an Assistant County Administrator, or any County Subdivision Agent is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish the provisions of this ordinance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 3. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption, and a certified copy of this ordinance shall be recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in accordance with §15.2-2272.2 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended). On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None IN RE: POSTPONED PUBLIC HEARINGS ROM JANUARY 27, 1998 1. Second Reading of ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit to allow a private kennel. located at 4601 Goodman Road, Vinton Magisterial District. upon the petition of Golden Oaks Kennels. (Arnold Covey, Engineering & Inspections Director) (TABLED UNTIL JANUARY 27, 1998 AND POSTPONED TO FEBRUARY 10, 1998) 0-021098-10 Mr. Covey reported that this is a request to allow an eight dog private kennel. The Planning Commission recommended approval of this request with five conditions on December 2, 1997. The Board held a public hearing on December 16 and continued the February 10, 1998 (1) The number of dogs allowed shall be limited to five; however, the applicant is permitted to kennel the eight dogs currently on the property. Upon the death or disposition of any dog in excess of the five dogs pemiitted, the owner shall not be allowed to replace said dogs. (2) The Special Use Permit is restricted to Raymond and Patricia Harris only and shall not be transferable to any other property owner. (3) A kennel silencer shall be installed. (4) No signage advertising animals for sale shall be permitted. (5) Staff shall make an administrative review of the special use permit for compliance with the ordinance after twelve months. (6) No dog from the kennel will be allowed out of the kennel unless under the control and supervision of the owner or an agent of the owner. 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance modifying Condition #1 and adding Condition #6, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 2. Second reading of ordinance to amend and reenact Section 10-3 Article 1 of Chapter 10 "Licenses" of the Roanoke County Code in order to conform with a state code amendment to eliminate charging a license fee to certain businesses subject to a license tax. (Brent Robertson. Budget Manager) February 10, 1998 NAYS: None ORDINANCE 021098-11 TO AMEND AND REENACT SECTION 10-3, ARTICLE I OF CHAPTER 10 "LICENSES" OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE IN ORDER TO CONFORM WITH A STATE CODE AMENDMENT TO ELIMINATE CHARGING A LICENSE FEE TO CERTAIN BUSINESSES SUBJECT TO A LICENSE TAX WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority of Chapter 37 (Section 58.1-3700, et seq.) of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, the County of Roanoke, Virginia, imposes a business, professional, and occupational license (BPOL) tax through the adoption of an ordinance codified in Chapter 10 Licenses of the Roanoke County Code; and, WHEREAS, said state enabling legislation was substantially amended by the 1996 session of the Virginia General Assembly and the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County adopted an ordinance in June of 1996, to be effective on January 1, 1997, amending the Roanoke County Code to address and conform with the state code provisions, including imposition of a $50 fee for issuance of a business license; and, WHEREAS, §58.1-3703 of the Code of Virginia was amended by the 1997 session of the General Assembly to provide that the license taxes authorized therein shall not be assessed and collected on any amount of gross receipts of each business upon which a license fee is charged, which amendment is to be effective July 1, 1998; and, WHEREAS, said amendment necessitates a revision to §10-3 of the County Code, to be effective July 1, 1998; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors finds that, for businesses with gross receipts of $100,000 or more and therefore subject to the BPOL tax, the tax should properly be assessed on the "whole, entire, total receipts, without deduction", as gross receipts is defined in the state and County code, and that in accordance with the amendment to §58.1-3703, such businesses shall not be charged the $50 license fee under §10-3(a)(1); and, WHEREAS, legal notice of this amendment has been published in a newspaper of general circulation within Roanoke County on January 13, 1998, and January 20, 1998; and, WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on January 13, 1998, and the second reading and public hearing on this ordinance was held on February 10, 1998. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: Fphruary 10, 1998 2. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from July 1, 1998. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 3. Second reading of ordinance to vacate a five-foot portion of a sanitary sewer and drainage easement located on Lot 8A and shown on the subdivision plat of Nottingham Park as recorded in Plat Book 20, Page 77, and located in Windsor Hills Magisterial District. (Amold Covey. Director of Engineering and Inspections) 0-021098-12 Mr. Covey advised there were no changes since the first reading. There was no discussion and no citizens to speak on this ordinance. Supervisor McNamara moved to adopt the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ORDINANCE 021098-12 AUTHORIZING THE VACATION OF A 5 FOOT PORTION OF A SANITARY SEWER AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT LOCATED ON LOT 8, NOTTINGHAM PARK, PLAT BOOK 17, PAGE 124, (ALSO KNOWN AS LOT 8A, NOTTINGHAM PARK, PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 77) IN THE WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT February_ 10, 1998 recordation costs, shall be the responsibility of the petitioner, Triangle Developers, Inc., or their successors or assigns; and, 3. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption, and a certified copy of this ordinance shall be recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in accordance with Section 15.2-2272.2 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended). On motion of Supervisor McNamara to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 4. Second reading of ordinance to vacate a 20-foot drainage easement recorded in Plat Book 16. Page 128, and located on Lot 1, a portion of the right of way for Cater Grove Lane. and Lot 23. Section 2, Plantation Grove as recorded in Plat Book 19. Page 175. located in Hollins Magisterial District. (Arnold Covey, Director of Engineering and Inspections) 0-021098-13 Mr. Covey advised there were no changes since the first reading. There was no discussion and no citizens to speak on this ordinance. Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None February 10, 1998 Exhibit attached hereto, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to Section 15.2-2272.2 of the Code of Virginia, (1950, as amended); and, 2. That, as a condition to the adoption of this ordinance, all costs and expenses associated herewith, including but not limited to publication, survey and recordation costs, shall be the responsibility of the petitioners, Michael L. and Crystal L. LaBrie and DVW, Incorporation, or their successors or assigns; and, 3. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption, and a certified copy of this ordinance shall be recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in accordance with Section 15.2-2272.2 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended). On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 5. Second reading of ordinance to vacate a 50-foot unimproved right-of-way referred to as Champ Drive as recorded in Plat Book 5. Page 82, located in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. (Arnold Covey, Director of Engineering and Inspections) 0-021098-14 Mr. Covey advised there were no changes since the first reading. There was no discussion and no citizens to speak on this ordinance. Supervisor Minnix moved to adopt the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None February 10, 1998 management, collection, transmission and distribution of any form of drainage, including but not limited to stormwater drainage, together with the right of ingress and egress thereto from a public road, is hereby reserved and retained. The location of said easement is shown cross -hatched and desig- nated as "50' DEDICATED D.E." on the map entitled 'Vacating of 50' Right Of Way Known As Champ Drive And Retaining A 50' Dedicated Drainage Easement' attached hereto and made a part hereof. b. That fee simple title to the centerline of Champ Drive shall vest in the owners of the abutting properties as provided in §15.2- 2274 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), subject to the above -described drainage easement and subject to the condition that the vacated area of land shall be added and combined, by deed or by plat, to said abutting properties, in compliance with the Roanoke County Subdivision and Zoning Ordinances, and other applicable laws and regulations. c. That all costs and expenses associated herewith, including but not limited to publication, survey and recordation costs, shall be the responsibility of the Petitioner; and, 2. That the County Administrator, an Assistant County Administrator, or any County Subdivision Agent is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish the provisions of this ordinance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 3. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption, and a certified copy of this ordinance shall be recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in accordance with §15.2-2272.2 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended). On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None IN RE: EXECUTIVE SESSION February 10, 1998 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Certification Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None IN RE: OPEN DISCUSSION There was an open discussion on budget and school budget issues from 8:10 p.m. until 8:55 p.m. IN RE: ADJOURNMENT At 8:57 p.m., Chairman Johnson adjourned the meeting to Thursday, February 12, 1998, at 5:00 p.m. fora joint meeting with the Roanoke County School Board at the School Administrative Offices. Submitted by, Approved by, Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board Bob L. Johnson Chairman February 12, 1998 115 Roanoke County Administration Center 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 February 12, 1998 The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County School Administrative Offices, this being an adjourned meeting from February 10, 1998, and a joint meeting with the Roanoke County School Board. IN RE: taken. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Johnson called the meeting to order at 5:01 p.m. The roll call was MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: taken. Chairman Bob L. Johnson, Vice Chairman Harry C. Nickens (arrived at 5:13 p.m.), Supervisors Fenton F. "Spike" Harrison, Joseph McNamara, H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix None Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney; Mary H. Alien, Clerk to the Board; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator; Diane Hyatt, Finance Director; Penny Hodge, Assistant Finance Director; Dr. Deanna Gordon, School Superintendent; Marty Robinson, Assistant Superintendent; Brenda Chastain, School Board Clerk Chairman Irvin called the School Board meeting to order. The roll call was February 12, 1998 117 WHEREAS, On October 9, 1997, American Eagle applied for 60 slots to serve 10 communities, including Roanoke with new 50 seat Embraer-145 Regional Jets; and WHEREAS, American Eagle is the world's largest air carrier in the world based on daily departures with over 1,200 daily flights carrying a million passengers monthly; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke Regional Airport provides the airline transportation needs for many businesses and individuals in southwest Virginia; and WHEREAS, air transportation is critical to the growth and development of a community, especially in attracting new businesses and; WHEREAS, the addition of three round-trip flights between Chicago and Roanoke would improve the quality of transportation for the community, enhance the economic development efforts of our region, and provide connecting flights to other locations throughout the United States. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia supports the application of Simmons Airlines, an American Eagle carrier, to provide additional flights to Chicago O'Hare International Airport; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors directs the Clerk to the Board to forward a certified copy of this resolution to the Honorable Rodney E. Slater, Secretary of the United States Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens School Board member Stovall moved to adopt a similar resolution from the School Board. The motion was approved by a unanimous voice vote. IN RE: EXECUTIVE SESSION At 5:05 p.m., Supervisor Johnson moved to go into Executive Session pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A.(3) acquisition or use of real estate for public school purposes. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Harrison, Minnix, Johnson NAYS: None February 12, 1998 119 carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None IN RE: ADJOURNMENT At 6:21 p.m., Chairman Johnson declared the meeting adjourned. Submitted by, Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board Approved by, Bob L. Johnson Chairman February 24, 1998 121 Roanoke County Administration Center 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 February 24, 1998 The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the fourth Tuesday, and the second regularly scheduled meeting of the month of February, 1998. N RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Johnson called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Bob L. Johnson, Vice Chairman Harry C. Nickens , Supervisors Fenton F. "Spike" Harrison, Joseph McNamara, H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney; Mary H. Allen, Clerk to the Board; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator; Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator; Anne Marie Green, Director, Community Relations IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES The invocation was given by the Reverend Robert Fielder, Covenant Presbyterian Church. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited by all present. February 24, 1998 123 Precinct was established; and the "Motor Voter" law was implemented by the Commonwealth of Virginia; and WHEREAS, in addition to his service on the Electoral Board, Mr. Johnson also served on the League of Older Americans Advisory Council, being first appointed in 1986; and WHEREAS, Mr. Johnson continues to serve the citizens of Roanoke County through his appointment on January 27, 1998, to the Roanoke County Commission for Senior and Challenged Citizens; and WHEREAS, through his leadership and involvement in volunteer activities in Roanoke County, Mr. Johnson has enhanced the quality of life for it's citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, on its own behalf and on behalf of all of the citizens of Roanoke County, does hereby extend sincere appreciation to WILTON B. "WEBB" JOHNSON, for his service to Roanoke County as a member of the Electoral Board until February 28, 1998, and for his active participation on other committees, commissions and boards; and FURTHER, the Board wishes Mr. Johnson an active, productive future, and expresses its pleasure that he will continue his outstanding volunteer contributions to the citizens of the County through his recent appointment to the Commission for Senior and Challenged Citizens. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None IN RE: NEW BUSINESS 1. Resolution supporting the inclusion of Franklin County to the Fifth Planning District Regional Alliance. (Elmer Hodge. County Administrator) R-022498-2 Mr. Hodge reported that on January 14, 1997, the Board adopted a resolution establishing a Regional Alliance under the Regional Competitiveness Act with the other members of the Fifth Planning District Commission. Franklin County has requested to participate in both the West Piedmont Partnership and the Fifth Planning District Regional February 24, 1998 125 population would be equally divided between the Fifth Planning District Regional Alliance and the West Piedmont Partnership; and FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED that copies of this resolution be forwarded to the Fifth Planning District Commission, the localities participating in the Fifth Planning District Regional Alliance, the Franklin County Board of Supervisors and the Virginia Department of Housing and Community Development. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 2. Request for approval to order police vehicles under the current state contract for delivery after July 1. 1998. (Ray Lavinder. Police Chief) A-022498-3 Chief Lavinder advised that if the Board authorizes the order of ten police vehicles, the County will save the 3% to 5% cost increases that are estimated after April 30. In response to questions from the Board, he advised that it costs $5,000 to $6,000 more to equip the vehicles for law enforcement and that Ford is the only manufacturer that makes law enforcement vehicles. Supervisor Nickens suggested that staff check local dealers to see if they could underbid the state contract. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve ordering the vehicles, amended by Supervisor Nickens that local Ford dealerships have the opportunity to underbid the State contract. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None February 24, 1998 127 Mahoney advised that the County could request an amendment to the State Code that all chartered counties could recoup costs through liens against the property. Supervisor Minnix moved to approve the program. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None IN RE: FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. First reading of ordinance approving three residential lease contracts on property located at Glenn -Mary and owned by the Board of Supervisors. (Melinda Cox. Economic Development Specialist) Ms. Cox reported that at the time the property was purchased from Glenn - Mary Associates, the three rental properties were occupied. From November, 1997 to March 31, 1998, the County chose to continue these verbal rental agreements via letters of confirmation. Beginning on April 1, 1998, staff recommends that the Board approve rental contracts for an initial period of six months without right of cancellation. Thereafter the contracts would be renewed for six month periods subject to cancellation at any time by either party upon providing 120 days written notice. The County will receive a total of $1,125 in rental income per month to be restricted for property management expenditures incurred during the normal maintenance and repair. February 24, 1998 129 maintenance and repairs such as fencing, fertilization, and property maintenance. Staff was directed to provide a copy of the lease for the second reading. Supervisor Harrison moved to approve the first reading and set the second reading for March 10, 1998. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Harrison, Minnix, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 3. First reading of ordinance amending Section 16-15, When Sale Authorized of Article V. Unclaimed Personal Property of Chapter 16. Police of the Roanoke County Code to provide for the donation of bicycles to charitable organizations. (Ray Lavinder. Police Chief) Chief Lavender reported that adoption of the ordinance would allow for recovered bicycles to be donated to a charitable organization and would increase evidence storage space. The bicycles would be donated if they remained unclaimed for more than thirty days. In response to a question from Supervisor Johnson, Chief Lavinder advised that they usually have 25 or 26 bicycles per year. Supervisor McNamara suggested amending the ordinance that the bicycles would be kept for at least 60 days to make sure that any children who may have lost their bikes have an opportunity to retrieve them. Supervisor Minnix moved to approve the first reading with the ordinance February 24, 1998 131 upon the petition of Ohio State Cellular Phone Company. Inc. IN RE: SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Second reading of ordinance rescinding Ordinance 011398-9 authorizing acquisition of certain real estate located on State Route 779 (Catawba) from the Commonwealth of Virginia. (Elmer C. Hodge. County Administrator) 0-022498-5 There was no discussion and no citizens to speak on this ordinance. Supervisor Nickens moved to adopt the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ORDINANCE 022498-5 RESCINDING ORDINANCE 011398-9 AUTHORIZING ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL ESTATE LOCATED ON STATE ROUTE 779 (CATAWBA) FROM THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, Ordinance 011398-9 authorized the acquisition of certain real estate located on State Route 779 (Catawba) from the Commonwealth of Virginia for the purpose of promoting economic development and protecting valuable environmental resources; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that Ordinance 011398-9 be, and hereby is rescinded, and that the $110,000 appropriated therein be, and hereby is, reappropriated to the Unappropriated General Fund. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the February 24, 1998 133 annum. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Ordinance 121697-8 authorizing the creation of, construction of, and financing for a local public works improvement project, Richland Hills Drive Water Project,. be, and hereby is amended to provide that the property owners in the Project Service Area who elect to participate on or before March 16, 1998, may do so under the terms and conditions set out in Ordinance 121697-8 except for the condition requiring a minimum down payment of $1,500, all other terms and conditions as set out in Ordinance 121697-8 to remain in full force and effect. On motion of Supervisor Harrison to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 3. Second reading of ordinance accepting the donation of approximately three acres of real estate from the Commonwealth of Virginia, by its Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation to Roanoke County. located north and west of the Catawba Fire Station off Virginia Secondary Route 698. (Paul Mahoney. County Attorney) 0-022498-7 Mr. Mahoney advised that the County still did not have the deed but they were tracking it. There was no discussion and no citizens to speak on this ordinance. Supervisor Harrison moved to adopt the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None February 24, 1998 135 2. Grievance Panel Supervisor McNamara nominated Beth Anderson to a three year term which will expire February 23, 2001. 3. Social Services Advisory Board Supervisor McNamara nominated Raymond C. Denny to complete the unexpired term of Jan Dowling. This term will expire August 1, 2000. IN RE: CONSENT AGENDA R-022498-8 Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the Consent Resolution. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None as follows: RESOLUTION 022498-8 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM I, CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, 1. that the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for February 24, 1998, designated as Item I - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 3, inclusive, as follows: 1. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Cedar Hill Subdivision. February 24, 1998 137 using the spaces, and that the Division of Motor Vehicles needed to be stricter in approving handicapped tags. He also suggested that two officers enforce the new ordinance, not volunteers. (2) He asked for a response from the Board on his videotape concerning flooding in North Springs, and he asked for assurances that the problem will be resolved. IN RE: REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS Supervisor Minnix: (1) He asked Mr. Hodge if Roanoke County could foster a plan of sending volunteers to assist other localities in natural disasters. Mr. Hodge responded that the County works through various state agencies and the Red Cross to coordinate assistance. (2) He asked Mr. Hodge if he had received any response on whether the veterinarians would be willing to sell dog and cat licenses when giving rabies shots. Mr. Hodge advised that he had discussed this with Treasurer Fred Anderson, and there were concerns about accountability; but he would contact Mr. Anderson again. Supervisor Johnson reported that he was disappointed in the General Assembly's recent actions, and the fact that the proposed Regional Juvenile Detention Commission was defeated because of politics. Supervisor Harrison: (1) He agreed with Supervisor Johnson on the General Assembly's actions. (2) He advised that he attended the Virginia Department of Transportation presentation at the Salem Civic Center about the 1-81 expansion and noted that it will have an impact on Catawba. Mr. Hodge has formed a committee to work on this February 24, 1998 139 6. Additions and abandonments of the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System as of January 31. 1998. IN RE: EXECUTIVE SESSION At 4:10 p.m., Supervisor Johnson moved to go into Executive Session following the work session pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A to discuss disposition of the County's interest in publicly held real estate, Arlington Hills #2 well lot, and the Leslie Well Lot; 2.1-344 A (7) to discuss legal matter requiring provision of legal advice, negotiation of an agreement with the Town of Vinton and contract for sale of water and probable litigation, cable television franchise fees. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Harrison, Minnix, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None IN RE: WORK SESSION 1. Courthouse Space Needs The work session was held from 4:15 p.m. until 5:20 p.m. County Administrator John Chambliss presented options for improvements at the Courthouse. The options ranged from $35,000 to $3 million. He presented a list of prioritized recommendations and the associated costs. There was originally Board February 24, 1998 141 IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Certification Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None IN RE: PUBLIC HEARING 1. Public Hearing to elicit citizen comment for items to be included in the budget for the 1998-99 fiscal year. Mr. Hodge explained that this public hearing was to receive public input before the budget process begins, and another public hearing will be held later in the process. The following citizens spoke: 1. Don Witt. 3332 Kenwick Trail. spoke on behalf of the Greenway Commission, requesting a joint work session on March 24 to look at greenways and develop a financial plan to fund them. 2. Cindy Dugger 5355 Silver Fox Road, requested that additional nurses • February 24, 1998 143 Persons with Disabilities and amending and reenacting Section 12-51 Penalties for Parking Violations. Section 12-54. Parking Prohibited in Specified Places. and Section 12-59. Presumption in Prosecutions for Parking Violations. (Joseph Obenshain, Sr. Assistant County Attorney) 0-022498-10 Mr. Mahoney advised that the 1997 General Assembly session passed new legislation for the regulation of designated parking spaces for individuals with disabilities and increased the maximum fines which may be imposed for various violations of the designated parking spaces to $500. Supervisor Nickens advised that he had expressed concern about the use of volunteers to enforce the ordinance at the first reading. Mr. Mahoney responded that Chief Lavinder prefers to use trained law enforcement officers, but the state law allows volunteers. Mr. Hodge suggested that the auxiliary police officers, who are trained but volunteers could be used. Following discussion, Supervisor Nickens moved to adopt the ordinance. Supervisor McNamara moved to amend the ordinance to eliminate references to volunteers and insert trained auxiliary police officers. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ♦ February 24, 1998 145 (a) It shall be unlawful for a vehicle not displaying disabled parking license plates, an organizational removable windshield placard, a permanent removable windshield placard, or a temporary removable windshield placard issued under § 46.2- 1241 or DV disabled parking license plates issued under subsection B of § 46.2-739, to be parked in a parking space reserved for persons with disabilities that limit or impair their ability to walk or for a person who is not limited or impaired in his ability to walk to park a vehicle in a parking space so designated except when transporting a person with such disability in the vehicle. (b) The penalty for violation of this section shall be a fine of one hundred dollars ($ 100.00). (c) This ordinance may be enforced by the issuance of a summons or parking ticket for violation of the ordinance by a law -enforcement officer, trained auxiliary police officers serving in a unit established pursuant to subsection (e) of this ordinance, or by other uniformed personnel employed by the county to enforce parking regulation without the necessity of a warrant's being obtained by the owner of any private parking area. (d) In any prosecution charging a violation of this ordinance, no violation of this ordinance shall be dismissed on the basis of the property owner's failure to comply strictly with the requirements for disabled parking signs set forth in § 36-99.11 of the Code of Virginia, provided the space is clearly distinguishable as a parking space reserved for persons with disabilities that limit or impair their ability to walk. (e) The Roanoke County Police Department is authorized to establish and supervise trained auxiliary police officers to enforce violations of this ordinance. (f) The provisions of § 46.2-1247, § 46.2-1248, § 46.2-1249, § 46.2-1250, § 46.2-1251, § 46.2-1252 and § 46.2-1253 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, are each incorporated by reference into this section and made a part thereof as if set out in full. 2. That Sec. 12-51. Penalties for parking violations., Sec. 12-54. Parking prohibited in specified places. and Sec. 12-59. Presumption in prosecutions for parking violations. be amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 12-51. Penalties for parking violations. Any person violating any of the provisions of this article shall be deemed guilty of a traffic infraction and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined according to the following schedule: Double parking $15.00 Parking over allowed time 15.00 Parking improperly 15.00 Unattended motor in operation 15.00 February 24, 1998 147 squad equipment or ambulances; (e) Within twenty (20) feet or upon any bridge, viaduct or railroad crossing; (f) Any parking space reserved for the handicapped on a public street, whether identification of such spaces by above grade signs was 3tgno-oholHcr vc he betto -cdgc of the sign no lower than four (4) At any location where, at the time, parking, standing or stopping is prohibited and official signs or other markers to that effect have been erected or installed and are visible to an ordinarily observant person; Along any street, highway, of other public way within the county or part thereof constituting a part of the route of a parade for which a permit has been granted under Chapter 14 of this Code. The chief of police shall have the authority to designate any parade route and to post signs to such effect and when such signs are so posted, no person shall park or leave unattended any motor vehicle in violation thereof. Sec. 12-59. Presumption in prosecutions for parking violations. In any prosecution charging a violation of any provision of this article or any regulation or rule established pursuant hereto, proof that the vehicle described in the complaint, summons, parking ticket or warrant was parked in violation of such provision, together with proof that the defendant was, at the time of such parking violation, the registered owner of the vehicle, as required by chapter 6 (section 46.2-600 et seq.) of title 46.2 of the Code of Virginia, 1950 as amended, shall constitute in evidence a 0004014 rebuttable presumption that such registered owner of the vehicle was the person who February 24, 1998 149 g. A. Scott McDowell, 5999 Bradshaw Road They questioned the reason for appointing someone from another area of the County instead of reappointing the citizen who had served from the Bradshaw Road area. They also requested that a resident from the Bradhshaw Road community be appointed to the RVRA in the future because the landfill is located in their neighborhood. A petition was presented to the Board requesting that in the future, a member from the Bradshaw Road would always serve on the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority Board. Chairman Johnson asked staff to review the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority documents and bring back a report to the March 10, 1998 meeting. IN RE: ADJOURNMENT At 8:40 p.m., Chairman Johnson adjourned the meeting. Submitted by, Approved by, Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board Bob L. Johnson Chairman March 10, 1998 151 Roanoke County Administration Center 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 March 10, 1998 The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the second Tuesday, and the first regularly scheduled meeting of the month of March, 1998. N RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Johnson called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Bob L. Johnson, Vice Chairman Harry C. Nickens (left at 6:40 p.m.), Supervisors Fenton F. "Spike" Harrison, Joseph McNamara, H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney; Mary H. Allen, Clerk to the Board; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator; Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator; Anne Marie Green, Director, Community Relations IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES The invocation was given by John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited by all present. March 10, 1998 153 Supervisor Nickens moved to adopt the order. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ORDER 031098-1 SETTING THE TAX RATE ON REAL ESTATE SITUATE IN ROANOKE COUNTY FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1998 BE IT ORDERED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the levy for the twelve-month period beginning January 1, 1998, and ending December 31, 1998, be, and hereby is, set for a tax rate of OM per one hundred dollars of assessed valuation on all taxable real estate and mobile homes classified by §§ 58.1-3200, 58.1-3201, and 58.1-3506.B of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, situate in Roanoke County. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the order, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 2. Order setting the tax levy on all classes of personal property and machinery and tools situate in Roanoke County for the calendar year 1998. (Brent Robertson. Budget Manager) 0-031098-2 Mr. Robertson advised that the personal property tax rate was advertised at $3.50 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation, and that the machinery and tools tax rates were advertised at $3.00 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation. The public hearing was held February 24, 1998. Supervisor Minnix moved to adopt the order. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: March 10, 1998 155 3. Consideration of claim by Hanging Rock Estates. LLC. (Paul Mahoney. County Attorney) A-031098-3 Mr. Mahoney advised that Hanging Rock Estates seeks $2,752.43 for damages to their property as a result of the installation of the north water transmission line. Utility Director Gary Robertson has reviewed this claim and reports that the County hired Thomas Brothers to perform this portion of the work on the north water transmission line, and the County denies that it caused any damage. Mr. Mahoney explained that the State Code established a procedure for the submission of claims by citizens to the governing body for action, and no legal action may be maintained against the County upon any claim unless that person shall first present his claim to the Board of Supervisors. Supervisor Johnson advised that his company has six Tots for sale in the subdivision and he would abstain from voting on this issue. Supervisor Nickens moved to deny the claim. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Supervisor Johnson 4. Consideration of claim by Carlton and Associates. (Paul March 10, 1998 157 Mr. Mahoney advised that Mr. Woltz seeks $5,400.00 for unpaid rent of premises located on Poor Mountain and used by the County for a tower site for emergency communications. The County attempted to negotiate the purchase of this property and Mr. Woltz demanded $225,000.00 to purchase a 50' X 100' portion of the property, subject to certain limitations. An independent appraisal to determine fair market value was set at $107,000.00 which was offered to and rejected by Mr. Woltz. On October 28, 1997, the Board authorized the acquisition and immediate right of entry of the property by eminent domain proceeding. On November 21, 1997, the County deposited $107,000.00 with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and the funds were withdrawn by Mr. Woltz. In response to a question, Mr. Mahoney advised that the County last paid rent in September and that all these issues, including rent, should be argued in court. Supervisor Nickens moved to deny the claim. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 6. Request for approval to name the proposed business park at the Glenn -Mary site. (Elmer C. Hodge. County Administrator) A-031098-6 March 10, 1998 159 current membership but that the first available vacant position go to a citizen from Bradshaw Road. After discussion on the merits and need of increasing the RVRA Board, Supervisor Minnix withdrew his motion with no vote taken. Supervisor Harrison's original motion to increase the membership was defeated by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisor Harrison NAYS: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Nickens, Johnson Chairman Johnson asked that his item be returned to the Report Section of the Agenda to be received and filed. IN RE: FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. First reading of ordinance amending and reenacting the Comprehensive Plan by the adoption of the Roanoke Valley Regional Stormwater Management Plan as part of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning and Zoning) Mr. Harrington advised that the Stormwater Management Plan will serve as a valuable planning tool to mitigate and prevent future flooding in Roanoke County. The projects identified in the plan will serve as a guide for future stormwater improvements and funding sources. The adoption of the plan as a component of the March 10, 1998 161 facilities to be located on an existing transmission line. There will be underground lines and a small building. Supervisor Nickens asked if AEP is receiving rental for the tower, and that if they are, the County should share in any compensation. Supervisor McNamara and Supervisor Johnson agreed, but Supervisor Minnix responded that the County encouraged co -location of towers and unless there is a large sum of rent, the County should not charge. Mr. Mahoney advised that if the County charged rent, they would have no liability, and responded that he could negotiate with AEP for any rental that is received. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the first reading with paragraph 3 amended to allow staff to negotiate with AEP and set the second reading for March 24, 1998. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Harrison, Minnix, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 3. First reading of an ordinance declaring a parcel of real estate surplus and authorizing sale of a well lot, Arlington Hills #2. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) Mr. Mahoney advised that the well lot had been advertised and that an March 10, 1998 163 $8,200.00. Supervisor Minnix moved to approve the first reading and set the second reading and public hearing for March 24, 1998. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Harrison, Minnix, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 5. Ordinance to vacate and release property interests conveyed to the Board of Supervisors in connection with roads. streets, alleys, rights -of -way, and public access in and around Pinkard Court Subdivision. (Vickie Huffman. Assistant County Attorney) Ms. Huffman reported that the proposed ordinance would vacate and release and reconvey where applicable several real estate interests conveyed to the Board in connection with roads, streets, alleys, rights -of -way and public access in and adjoining the Pinkard Court Subdivision. On February 10, the Board vacated and closed the public rights -of -way and alleys and abandoned the secondary roads in Pinkard Court. The developer of the site, Lowe's Companies, had proceeded to finalize the property acquisition. Title searches on the properties have revealed a number of recorded instruments conveying or purporting to convey easements for right-of-way, a parcel for right-of-way, and an alley which are separate from the public rights -of -way March 10, 1998 165 AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ORDINANCE 031098-7 AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING THREE RESIDENTIAL LEASES ON THE GLENN-MARY FARM PROPERTY OWNED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY WHEREAS, the acquisition of the Glenn -Mary Farm property, containing 457.60 acres, and being designated on the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map No. 54.00-1-2, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County for economic development purposes was finalized on November 10, 1997; and, WHEREAS, the property includes three residential structures which were rented by the previous owner to the current tenants, namely Joe and Pam Miller at 5365 Glenmary Drive, Josephine Cox at 5393 Glenmary Drive, and Matthew and Danielle Stanley at 4958 Glenvar Heights Boulevard, each of whom have continued their tenancy with the County; and, WHEREAS, it would serve the public interest for the County to have the residences occupied and maintained until such time as all or portions of the property may be needed for economic development purposes; and, WHEREAS, on December 2, 1997, the Board authorized creation of a self balancing account entitled Glenn Mary Capital Account for acceptance of rent payments and expenditure of the funds on maintenance of the property; and, WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs that the acquisition or conveyance of an interest in real estate, including leases, shall be accomplished by ordinance; the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 24, 1998; and the second reading was held on March 10, 1998. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the County Administrator or an Assistant County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute a lease agreement with Joe and Pam Miller for the residence having the address of 5365 Glenmary Drive, from March 15, 1998, to September 14, 1998, and automatically renewable for six-month periods thereafter, for a monthly rental of $550.00 to be paid into the Glenn Mary Capital Account. 2. That the County Administrator or an Assistant County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute a lease agreement with Josephine Cox for the residence having the address of 5393 Glenmary Drive, from March 15, 1998, to September 14, 1998, and automatically renewable for six-month periods thereafter, for a monthly rental of $125.00 to be paid into the Glenn Mary Capital Account. 3. That the County Administrator or an Assistant County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute a lease agreement with Matthew and Danielle Stanley March 10, 1998 167 ORDINANCE 031098-8 AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING A FARM LEASE ON THE GLENN-MARY FARM PROPERTY OWNED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY WHEREAS, the acquisition of the Glenn -Mary Farm property, containing 457.60 acres, and being designated on the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map No. 54.00-1-2, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County for economic development purposes was finalized on November 10, 1997; and, WHEREAS, the property contains approximately 200 acres of land which is usable for hay and pasture, and in response to a Request for Proposal, the County staff has recommended leasing said property to A.M. Maxey and Keith Roberts; and, WHEREAS, it would serve the public interest for the County to have the property occupied and maintained until such time as all or portions thereof may be needed for economic development purposes; and, WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs that the acquisition or conveyance of an interest in real estate, including leases, shall be accomplished by ordinance; the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 24, 1998; and the second reading was held on March 10, 1998. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the County Administrator or an Assistant County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute a lease agreement with A.M. Maxey and Keith Roberts for the farm land at the Glenn -Mary Site, from March 15, 1998, to March 14, 1999, and automatically renewable annually thereafter, for pasturing cattle and/or horses and for harvesting hay, with rental to be the payment of all costs associated with repairs and maintenance of the property including fencing, fertilization of fields based upon soil testing, mowing and bushhogging, upkeep to the farm buildings on site, construction of cross -fencing as needed for phases of development, and regular visits to the property. 2. That said farm lease shall be subject to partial termination at any time by the County upon providing forty-five (45) days' written notice to the lessee, and shall be subject to final termination at any time by either the County or the Lessee upon providing the other party ninety (90) days' written notice, in order to permit the County to proceed with the phased development of the property at such time as is feasible. 3. That the County Administrator or an Assistant County Administrator is authorized to execute said lease agreement on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke and to execute such other documents and take such further actions as are necessary to accomplish these transactions, all of which shall be upon form and subject to the conditions approved by the County Attorney. 4. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. March 10, 1998 169 WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 24, 1998; and the second reading was held on March 10, 1998. WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors hereby finds that the donation of bicycles and mopeds to charitable organizations serves a valuable public interest. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County as follows: 1. That Section 16-15 of Article V of Chapter 16 of the Roanoke County Code is hereby amended as follows: Sec. 16-15. When sale d authorized. (a) Any unclaimed personal property which has been in the possession of the police department and is unclaimed for a period of more than sixty (60) days may be disposed of by the chief of police by public sale, subject to the provisions of this article. p.::::::.::.p. atp. € a to ble or iza 2. That this ordinance shall be effective from and after the date of its adoption. On motion of Supervisor McNamara to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None IN RE: PUBLIC HEARING 1. Public Hearing and adoption of resolution concerning acquisition by condemnation or other means of a permanent easement and temporary construction easement for the Carson Road Sewer Project on property owned by John A. Parks and Lena Ruth Parks and Christopher L. Tidman and Kaethe W. Tidman. (William Hopkins. Counsel) R-031098-10 March 10, 1998 171 RESOLUTION 031098-10 PURSUANT TO SECTION 15.2-1905(E) OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA, 1950, AS AMENDED, AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF EASEMENTS THROUGH TWO PARCELS OF LAND OWNED BY LENA RUTH PARKS, AND CHRISTOPHER L. TIDMAN AND KAETHE W. TIDMAN FOR THE CARSON RD. SEWER PROJECT Following a public hearing of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County of Tuesday, March 10, 1998, at 3:00 p.m., after due notice to the public, this Board makes the following findings of fact and adopted the following resolution: BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Carson Rd. Sewer Project has been approved to build sanitary sewer lines for the citizens of Roanoke County. 2. That the project is necessary for the general health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Roanoke County. 3. That acquisition of an interest in two parcels of land, described below, is necessary for construction of sanitary sewer lines in Roanoke County. 4. In order to complete this Project, the County needs to acquire an interest in the properties described below: (a) OWNER: Lena Ruth Parks PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Parcel of land located at 2945 Ruritan Rd., Roanoke, Virginia 24012 (Roanoke County Tax Map No. 40.17-2-7) (b) OWNER: Christopher L. Tidman and Kaethe W. Tidman PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Parcel of land located at 2825 East Ruritan Rd., Roanoke, Virginia 24012 (Roanoke County Tax Map No. 40.17-02-07.1) See attached plats identified as "EXHIBIT A" and "EXHIBIT B" showing easements to be acquired from Lena Ruth Parks, and Christopher L. and Kaethe W. Tidman, respectively. 5. That the fair market value of the interest in the properties to be taken and damages to the residue of such properties, if any, is as follows: PROPERTY OWNER FAIR MARKET VALUE AND DAMAGES. IF ANY Lena Ruth Parks $1, 076.00 March 10, 1998 173 AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None IN RE: APPOINTMENTS 1. Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission Supervisor Harrison appointed Richard Kelly to serve another term. The three-year term will expire April 8, 2001. IN RE: CONSENT AGENDA R-031098-11. R-031098-11. b, R-031098-11. c Supervisor Minnix moved to adopt the Consent Resolution with item 9 added. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None RESOLUTION 031098-11 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM J - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. that the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for March 10, 1998, designated as Item J - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 8, inclusive, as follows: March 10, 1998 175 RESOLUTION 031098-11.b REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF DEER RIDGE LANE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM WHEREAS, the streets described on the attached Additions Form SR- 5(a), fully incorporated herein by reference, are shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, and WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised this Board the streets meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(A) to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. , Recorded Vote Moved By: Seconded By: Yeas: Nays: Supervisor Minnix None Required Supervisors McNamara. Minnix. Harrison. Nickens, Johnson None RESOLUTION 031098-11.c RESCINDING, REPEALING, OR AMENDING CERTAIN POLICIES PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WITHIN THE GENERAL ADMINISTRATION, AND TO PROVIDE FOR A POLICY MANUAL TO GUIDE THE ADMINISTRATION OF COUNTY GOVERNMENT WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County hereby establishes a Policy Manual to provide an organized, systematic approach to the handling of routine matters by this government organization, and a dependable source of reference for all County departments and the Board; and, WHEREAS, this Policy Manual is based upon actions taken and measures adopted by the various boards of supervisors of Roanoke County over the past 20 years; and, March 10, 1998 177 IN RE: REPORTS Supervisor Minnix moved to receive and file the following reports after discussion of Item 6 under New Business. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Proclamations signed by the Chairman 5. Report on Value Engineering for Bonsack Elementary School 6. Report on appointments to the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority. This item was discussed and voted on under New Business. IN RE: BRIEFINGS 1. 1997 Report of Economic Development Activity from the Economic Development Partnership. (Beth Doughty. Executive Director Ms. Doughty advised that in 1997, they received 765 inquiries and 42 prospects visited the Roanoke Valley, an increase of 28%. Two-thirds of these visits were generated by the Economic Development Partnership. She explained that 17 of the 42 prospects considered locating in Roanoke County. She reported there were 60 expansions resulting in 16,000 new jobs and a $224 million payroll. Ms. Doughty also March 10, 1998 179 WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Certification Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None IN RE: WORK SESSIONS 1. Consideration of a program for emergency medical dispatching. Chief Rick Burch gave an overhead presentation, advising that Emergency Medical Dispatchers (EMDs) would give basic emergency medical care instruction for 911 calls that are received. EMDs would have to take specialized training, and if they were not trained, could not give any medical guidance. He highlighted the benefits of using trained Emergency Medical Dispatchers but advised that there would be increased stress levels for the EMDs. Costs associated for personnel, training and supplies is $194,405.00 and the funds could be appropriated from the General Fund or from a $.40 increase in the 911 tax. The current tax is $1.06. March 10, 1998 181 machinery and tools. He also presented a list of all capital maintenance projects with a prioritization of the top ten. He advised that there was about $170,000 budgeted for capital maintenance projects. He also highlighted the top ten additional funding requests from the following budget teams: Public Safety, Community Services, Human Services, Internal Services and Operations, and Judicial and State Services. Mr. Robertson presented vehicle information including the 1998 vehicle inventory, a list of vehicles that currently meet the criteria for replacement, and a list that will meet the criteria in the next twelve months. 4. Update on the Sanitary Sewer Evaluation and Rehabilitation (SSE/R) Program Utility Director Gary Robertson offered an overhead presentation of the SSE/R Program. It included a history of the program, a list of the SSER sewer sheds and where they are located. They are Mudlick Creek - Oak Grove area, Back Creek - Penn Forest area, West County - Glenvar East and Glenvar High School area, Peters Creek - Montclair and North Lakes areas, Murray Run - Green Valley area and Carvins Creek - Brookside area. He presented an overview of the progress made in each sewer shed. He advised that options for Board consideration are: (1) continue to identify and eliminate Inflow and Infiltration sources; (2) replacement of existing lines and/or construction of relief sewers and pump stations with force mains; (3) installation of backflow/check values; (4) installation of manual shut-off values; and (5) sewer back- A-032498-9.a ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 24, 1998 SUBJECT: Confirmation of appointment to the Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The following nomination was made at the March 10, 1998 Board meeting and should now be confirmed. Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission Supervisor Harrison nominated Richard Kelly to serve another three year term which will expire April 8, 2001. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the above appointment be confirmed by the Board of Supervisors. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: Brenda J. H Iton Elmer C. Hodge Deputy Clerk County Administrator 1 ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson to approve Harrison _ x Denied ( ) Johnson _ x Received ( ) McNamara _ x Referred ( ) Minnix — x To () Nickens _ x cc: File Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission File 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998 RESOLUTION 032498-9.b REQUESTING APPROVAL BY THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OF TWO PROPOSED WELCOME SIGNS AND A LANDSCAPED PLANTING AREA IN THE CLEARBROOK COMMUNITY WITHIN A PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY IN ROANOKE COUNTY WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation shall review specifications for the design, installation and maintenance of community welcome signs and landscape plantings in highway medians at particular locations in Roanoke County, and WHEREAS, Roanoke County has previously selected, received approval for, established and maintained numerous community welcome signs and gateway beautification sites on primary highways, and WHEREAS, the Clearbrook community has indicated its desire for, and the Board of Supervisors hereby expresses its willingness to fund the design and installation of this project - sum total not to exceed $3,500 - and that the Board of Supervisors will provide for the perpetual maintenance of this project in lieu of a permit fee or continuous bond. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia requests that the Virginia Department of Transportation approve the submitted specifications and permit community welcome signs at the following locations; said permit to include approval of a landscaped planting area at location (2) specified herein: (1) U.S. 220 north of the Blue Ridge Parkway (2) U.S. 220 at VA 958 (Dunahoo Drive) On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: C*- Brenda J. Hol n, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 76112,e)4r, cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Virginia Department of Transportation ACTION NO. 1 ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: March 24, 1998 Resolution Requesting Approval by the Virginia Department of Transportation of Two Proposed Welcome Signs and a Landscaped Planting Area in the Clearbrook Community Within a Public Right -of Way in Roanoke county COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: For the past several fiscal years, the Board of Supervisors has funded a program authorizing the design, planting and maintenance of various gateway locations around the County. Eighteen -Thousand ($18,000) dollars was appropriated for this program for the current FY 1997/1998 fiscal year. This amount included design services, materials, and maintenance for all locations. Recently, Roanoke County began working with representatives of the Clearbrook Civic league on a proposal to install two community identification signs and one landscaped median within the Route 220 right-of-way at the north and south entrances into this Roanoke County community. The Civic League wishes to cost - share on the cost of the signs and has indicated a willingness to maintain the landscaped median once planted. VDOT has requested that Roanoke County adopt the prepared resolution. The resolution indicates that Roanoke County is responsible for the cost of this program, and the perpetual maintenance of these areas. FISCAL IMPACT: The anticipated Roanoke County share of the cost of these two signs and landscaped area is approximately $1,750. Funding is available within the previously appropriated gateway funds. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: 1. That the Board of Supervisors adopt the prepared resolution. Respectfully Submitted, Approved, 6k7 Terrance L,r'Harr' ton, AICP Elmer C. Hodge Director f Planning and Zoning County Administrator Vote No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by Harrison Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) McNamara Referred Minnix to Nickens Action • AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998 RESOLUTION REQUESTING APPROVAL BY THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OF TWO PROPOSED WELCOME SIGNS AND A LANDSCAPED PLANTING AREA IN THE CLEARBROOK COMMUNITY WITHIN A PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY IN ROANOKE COUNTY WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation shall review specifications for the design, installation and maintenance of community welcome signs and landscape plantings in highway medians at particular locations in Roanoke County, and WHEREAS, Roanoke County has previously selected, received approval for, established and maintained numerous community welcome signs and gateway beautification sites on primary highways, and WHEREAS, the Clearbrook community has indicated its desire for, and the Board of Supervisors hereby expresses its willingness to fund the design and installation of this project - sum total not to exceed $3,500 - and that the Board of Supervisors will provide for the perpetual maintenance of this project in lieu of a permit fee or continuous bond. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia requests that the Virginia Department of Transportation approve the submitted specifications and permit community welcome signs at the following locations; said permit to include approval of a landscaped planting area at location (2) specified herein: (1) U.S. 220 north of the Blue Ridge Parkway (2) U.S. 220 at VA 958 (Dunahoo Drive) A-032498-9. c ACTION # ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 24, 1998 AGENDA ITEM: Request to Donate a Surplus Water Tank to Franklin County Parks & Recreation COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Pf-e-4$71-4 BACKGROUND: In the fall of 1997, we were contacted by staff at Franklin County concerning the possible availability of a used water tank. They are in the process of developing a park with rest rooms and a concession stand and are in need of a small water tank (app. 5,000 gallons). At the time of the request we had no surplus tanks that would be suitable for their needs. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: By connecting the Green Hill subdivision to the south transmission line this winter, we have eliminated a small water system that was served by two wells. This water system included a small water tank that needs to be removed. Our staff has obtained cost estimates for the removal and disposal of the tank as shown below: Hauling Tank $200.00 Crane Rental 250.00 Labor 408.00 Salvage Value (180.00) TOTAL COST $678.00 The tank is approximately 25 years old and the 10,000 gallon capacity is not adequate for water systems requiring fire protection. Therefore, the tank is not suitable for reuse in Roanoke County's system. S- Franklin County was contacted and asked if they would be interested in the tank with the condition that they pay all costs associated with the removal. Their staff has inspected the tank and agreed to pay all costs associated with removing the tank. FISCAL IMPACT: The Utility Department has no need for this tank and will save approximately $678.00 if the tank is donated. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The size, age and condition of the tank makes the tank of no value to the Utility Department. Staff would recommend donation of the tank to Franklin County. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: .4.44 di,- 7(6 97( Gary bertson, P.E. / Elmer C. Hodge Utility Director County Administrator VOTE No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson to approve Harrison _ x Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) McNamara _ x Referred ( ) Minnix _ x To () Nickens _ x ACTION cc: File Gary Robertson, Director, Utility GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Aug 19, 1997 Sept 23, 1997 Oct 28, 1997 Dec 2, 1997 Dec 16, 1997 Jan 13, 1998 Feb 24,1998 Amount Audited Beginning Balance at July 1, 1997 9,614,873.00 Addition from 1997-98 Budget - Transfer of Garage Operations to the County 200,000.00 First installment payment on West County Business Park (1,000,000.00) Revenue Sharing Payment to Botetourt County through June 30, 1997 (158,280.86) Eminent domain for communications facility (107,000.00) Underground storage tank removal (65,983.00) Carson Road sewer project (150,000.00) Downpayment on Catawba Farm (110,000.00) Cancel Catawba Farm appropriation 110,000.00 Balance at March 24, 1998 $8,333,609.14 % of General Fund Revenues 9.69% 8.40% Changes below this line are for information and planning purposes only. Balance from above West County Business Park - balance Reserve for R.R. Donnelly - Phase II Economic Development $8,333,609.14 (2,000,000.00) (730,700.00) (500,000.00) $5,102,909.14 5.14% Note: On December 18, 1990, the Board of Supervisors adopted a goal statement to maintain the General Fund Unappropriated Balance at 6.25% of General Fund Revenues 1997-98 General Fund Revenues $99,264,769.00 6.25% of General Fund Revenues $6,204,048.06 Respectfully Submitted, �C iJ• Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance M:\Finance\Common\B oard\G en97. W K4 CAPITAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Beginning Balance at July 1, 1997 Revenues from sale of vehicles 1996-97 Audited Balance at July 1, 1997 Amount $1,113,043.00 3 8,406.64 1,151,449.64 Amount added from 1996-97 operations per rollover policy 744,687.00 October 14, 1997 Transfer to Future School Capital Fund (1,113,043.00) Balance at March 24, 1998 $783,093.64 Note: $100,000 of these funds have been temporarily advanced to the Mayflower Hills Park project. Respectfully Submitted, Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance M:\Finance\Common\Board\Cap97.WK4 RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Amount From 1997-98 Original Budget $143,000.00 October 14, 1997 Design of South County Park (20,000.00) Balance at March 24, 1998 $123,000.00 Respectfully Submitted, - "L�7 Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance M:\Finance\Common\Board\Board97.WK4 1 • • • ACTION # ITEM NUMBER 1/ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 24, 1998 AGENDA ITEM: Accounts Paid - February 1998 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Direct Deposit Checks $3,780,979.38 Payments to Vendors: Payroll: 2/6/98 $438,910.92 $234,317.01 673,227.93 2/20/98 429,666.72 238,978.91 668,645.63 $5,122,852.94 A detailed listing of the payments is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance 4..-it,k Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator • • • Approved () Motion by No Yes Abs Denied O McManara Received () Harrison Referred () Johnson To () Minnix Nickens (1'-5 00 CN M Statement of Estimated and Actual Revenues For the 08 Month Period Ended 02/28/98 N u 1. OS ft C A o 0 04a General Fund 00 ND N Q\ N V) M ‘.O h oo N M V) NO N V1 00 V) N Q1 V) O, Or1 M ‘,O \•O O Q\ V1 M O M h M M M VD V) V U N h O\ N V) 00 V) N h 00 h O O N V) O N D1 ^"' h O O O h .D ^ O .O M 00 M N d, V M O V1 00 (-J 00 71' Cr, V) V) \D \O 'D \0 VD V) o0 NO \O NO 00 h VD VD O \O 00 M \O VD h V) N �D 00 N h M h V) 1/4-0 Cr, O O ,--, O\ V M N NO O O\ ND O .--. V) --i M O O\ \O O V) ‘O O1 ,--V) r+ O ,-, VD a, N o, O\ M oo -- oo h N o0 NO M M O NO M h •--4 V) vO Vl V1 00 O N h O, 0, V) O V) V) - V) \O '.O \D O O M l - ---- cr., N \O O \O •-" O, M N N M — 1--4 ^' — V1 N ON V1 V) '.O •-+ V) M — 'O V) U Vi M N M o V 00 M O V) 4\ M « N 00 O vO N vD M h Vi Vi 7 M71f O N M N o, ON N V NO 71' N O 714 O NO 714 o, O1 N ON N O V N M 71- h N M V) en N V) O N h N N O� M M M 00 N N N Nil .-, ,--. N N N 00 M NO h M V) O \O O 4\ •--, .O h 00 d• on O O O\ h O M V) O N ^-. cr o, VD 00 M O 00 M h O O h CT ,--' V) N h .--. M \-O V) o, M h M \-O h M V) h h 00 V) O VD h h V) M M M Cr, ON VD N 00 V) h M U M 00 O VD h h VD \O 00 M CO O •--. O h O 00 N a1 VO h — V) O 00 v .6 M M 00 V N O 00 - D\ M V1 V 00 00 M o1 U — V) O o; \0 V) M O M V) M '.D h o, N V) N M -. N V) M M M O O`, O O '.O - 00 h O., '.O ^. 00 V) Ch., N O O M 10 N Cr) M N •--I M M 00 01 ,--. N M h M O Il M M N --. — N •--, "" N 00 O V) 01 O 00 12D 00 O 10 V) O O 10 00 V) 1 O\ Q\ h U Q1 CT, VD 00 \O h 00 00 O1 N O O\ \O M M K) VD ON V) 00 V) '.O 00 00 a1 V) N V) O o0 O NO V V) M N V) M O 00 h 0 O.. oo N NO 00 M M NO O h M NO V) V) O C) V h �O V h O 01 00 M 00 V) M o0 4 M V V M O V1 00 Vl CD 71'h V) OWN v1oo� �N NN D00 �� en en V)— O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 \O O O N O VD O v1 rn O 'In h 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 00 O O O VD h ("1 O O M O h O h 0 00 o, an 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O., 0 0 0 O\ V1 O V) O N O NO N O 00 h �O M— Vi o O Vi V) Vi O kr V) O Vi o 00 O O o tr Vt O o Vl O; (Ar) r O M 4 O 00 00 N M O N NO O O O ON N M O N O NO M V NO V O ON N o0 M V• V) M V) N NO O VD O t h V) O '0 N M N V) '.O M M M M - V) O V) V) V) M N M N N V N Real Estate Taxes E 0 bp 48 a f�cl kE. a)g E-4.6 0 ti-i0 > 0 •�b0 ct j E" E= o �° a°i a0 i a) �, N c°'i o a o U w o a ,.. E-� x° w �. • ° a w a a��i w v To ° aE�8�0a)°o�,�o oU�°°w,�►.�5Uo .En< ��bno 74 5 a g , 0a.a caU 0 gq w �et et 0 0 v, nvsa ;; w° i ° °Uw a� 44 p , �, v, w, g 03 «, k o v, Ca�4 bA a� Z; a�i _ w chi a~i a~i aaaaaUaaw4E�xE�0-C..aawva4.xUUa aal za3w53w5 6 O 4--4 N M d 0 4--4 N M V) '.D h 00 O. O h 00 0\ 0 ^4 N 00 0 4--4 NO 0 h M O N '.O N .-+ 4--4 --1 4--1 N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M M M d V) V) V) VD NO NO h 00 00 00 ON 00000000000000000000000000000000000000 N W ON N M Statement of Estimated and Actual Revenues For the 08 Month Period Ended 02/28/98 d N v a> et 000 A o o te 0 >a 4. Oa 04 General Fund a as N 00 VD N a rI a. A County of Roanoke, Virginia Statement of Estimated and Actual Revenues For the 08 Month Period Ended 02/28/98 N cJ General Fund 00 Grand Totals 0 O z w 4:32:21PM d 4. A'O a O 15 C O b0 0, 4-0 O+ 0 ty h02 L el W CC i w _y44 ['Iy 4 bA 0 Ca Unencumbered CA 4 .-'. ‘4, kin CD N M 41 00 •--� 00 r- N VD 00 CV ,7r t kin p M VD O— N CD M 0, OM Op Op '� O� — 00 Op p O d\ 4 M VD t'0 4\ N H Len O V0 r- VD VD vD vD CN v0 0000 vD VD' 00 VD O, t� •--. 0rl . , vO v) t7 �t O\ O O -. en ,rv1 0\ 'r O, O CD01 • O\ 00 N N 00 ,. 10t- -. N r t- O 00 vn 7t vD N ,c• N t-- 01 00 O O 00 .-. M vO N O-. Vl \O v1 00 M 0 M M V'1 t` 4 00 R .O 06 N 00 ri M kin O ,-. vO 00 vn 7r O o0 — M R l O -. c' VD �' `O [h M 00 N t M •-- M kO t- — 0\ l M mO O vO vO ' O 00 M ,-. M 00 r- O Nr vl vl ri rO to - to vl 00 0'. 00 tN 0'. to OA 00 O 0'. r- N 0000 0000 O41 N I4n M 41 vD M N VD M 00 vl [- N Q1 M 00 0000 r 00 -. VD M O 00 'O N N �--� O� Vl v) ^' O N d M 00 N N N �p v. v y 00 O� M 00 - M vO V '� vO .-. r O N 01 V1 vl t� Cl M — O O �+ qun •' V) l 00 M O '� O N vl M l- N M M 6 440 1.p A �tO�� �N ci - —00 ' ON�rnNd4 M CS CT ;es eO 00 7r M t ^ 'O O'. ,+ r '". '.O kin 00 r- tt O N M 0s kn r- \O OP '.O 0' R t. N �O O� 00 .O N N t: l� M a; a\ • N N OHO N Ian O 4' C d — N 01 V' M 00 N 0\ M ^� 1 ONO M 0000 O M 01 M t- 0\ t� M W , M M vt N N O N 1. I: O ..r 'Om ~ 00 VI 0 0 0 0 0 Ian 000 O O O O O O O O OI* 0 r- N O vn O [n N v) D: O t- 00 p pO rl v1 O t- �7 O o eP O O 0 0 0 0 0 O Q d �, .0-vn en M0, N N7r— 0.O \O Qy R 0'. '.O '.0 O N N O V> M .� O 00 O\ O M N d' y �0 ., 00 M •--. D, N a; ri �t N M �, t� 00 v) [A t N N h v) .If). sta PM Ctt 0,0 t~ to ■r td. O 4: ^O 40 ~ ��N MM 00 UFO O� �D 0000 7M�O O CD en M�NlO�tOOut v1 M 00 VD N N N O O O M QEl C ,_;• • r 00 l 1n •-. q5 V ' N_ N 00 '0 N o0 00 vl M O O O vn M V) 00 M M v) O vl M vl M '.O VD CV: • V 0 p —� O VI WI 00 41 CI Cl N 0. un N vn '.O vn 0. O 00 N M '.O �n g1 g a N tz .--. N N vO O� 0� M_ O� tn [� M M O< O M .O o0 O O kn cow I-, ii i4 r, O M vO .4 co -t M M �O O 00 �--� N O 0N 00 O M O to O Ls7 en .--i .--� .--. .--� r-. At' cla CI Z O • 6 U +�+ y vt �D a, M Ni t1 O O l� a1 N 0 00 O 0 �O r- 0 O O 0 CLI 011 O t\ Or O r- t-.0 N M 4. v) t- t- O t- 0 0 0 N O 0 0 0 VD W O b d a O M ON V M N 0\ O N_ t0 00 O O O kr;C'- O 00 .O v7 N N 00 a '.0 v1 N O l� c\ VD In N M 00 - - t0 t0 00 01 N In 10 M 00 yr vO o, O vD t` 0- [ ^ N �n VD vi O O� vO vO �O �O r- V O. O 00 N O M v1 t` O q0 vi 00 M 4 O v) N o vl O O vD 4\ �--1 O M V r"� �' [� �O �O O M rn t 00 V M rn C-1 7r ..fir N r- N r+ O� t� l� O l N N M nj In '. .- oo V t` ri N -� OO cia 1 Fund 100 General Fund d 0 t~ U o F. 0 4 -4E. tq c y oA .co ��3� z ti eb oU �Aal aa) °U xxan � °vex 5 o fit $ 4"2 © 041 o 06 ei o ..I a". col o 0• 0: W 40 0 ,-, N M .* N .--- N M 1- — N en of In vD .•+ M ct v) VD N 00 ON O O O 000 00000000 O O O O O 0000 .1, d• n ,n In ,n , In in lin vi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 00 b M 00 Ch 00 N For the 08 Month Period Ended N wz Unencumbered Year to Date • 00 r r \D M M D r \D O O O O d' O O\ N V) N N N 00 M M M <. O O O O N V? In r • 00 C' VS CZ O O r 0C M O\ O\ O '� 00 V) V) 00 'D V t- 00 C\ \O M r v V) O O NO ) t O M rN000 0 8 8 r 000 N V N O\..-(6 C o,NMO In NC r000O r rim N O ' - 00 l.; 00 'r V) O on (V '.D 00 O O M Ii r \D CI re)N V) N O O\ --- O O r+ CO O O O 00 \o r v) 00 M V) N 00 00 00 V) O O N 0 0 0 0\ r cc) M In M O M N 00 N M N 00 t` O V) - N Co()' (. 0 ,•.4 cc) O\ r tin R N V) N \D t� ^-. O V) O r to) .-• \D 00 M -- Ln N r M — 0' Ch ,. Q\ N - �" N 26,102,733.78 44,761,261.64 M V) O 'o � r O r M '.D N O O O O -'+ N O b 00 re 01 M O N ^' t� t� O r M N 0 0 0 0 M \D O O 00 00 00 .-.i .tNi 4 O O O a, 00 0 00 0 O O O O O CO O O O ..�y O O \o N r 7 M ut M V r V) dw O M O 0�0 M M 00 00 In O r. N 00 M \D •e N M M 0000^ N 1 -i ,.. ri ,-, ri M M M VD ac O\ vrnO M t�OOO r OOO\OOOO Q\ OO co vo 0 C. O N .46 t` OOO .e 00000000 00 OO O O\ S 4 O 4 r O .•- Vi O N O 0 0 0 0 O O O co 0 0 O- N Va. r) In l N. Nr 4 vo rn en re 12 = v5. 'D r o\ N N M a A ...i In 0 W Fund 100 General Fund in ▪ D, O M O N 00 O O M O\ 00 O O O O O V) O to O t` ▪ rO N NN\DO .•i 00---0\0000 O 71-0 el• 00 \p M V1 CSQ\ O M �_ N N_ O O O O O N In d' O d V) N O N N 00 O\ ▪ O r O, .4 in \o O O\ O" 00 en eel N 4,00 00 � M V) N ad' O N 1/46O O\ �_ .4H eisi kr) (NI 00 e▪ t N M N 00 N- N \D VZ '• kri in4 r O 00 C\ O O O O 00 O O O O O 00 O CD O 00 O N O O -• O N O O O O O O O O O V N O\ (-4\0 00 \D N O O\ M r O O M on 01 \O N ,-4N V) M • N V) N r 6 N 0 0 0 oo O r V) M N 00 00 N •--, N a\ Is\O l., 0 0 0' t Cr,O\ M M p r�ei \D �'.DNv'� 00 O-+oo664(. 4.00 O 00 M a., -4 r O\ t- O cr.O in N CD�--- 0 r N O\ In r \D N '.O \D 00 \o .4 00 Vi .4 .--� •--� Q\ of .4 o\ \D N 4 .4"N . in Health and Welfare Parks & Recreation 0600 Parks, Recreation & Cultural p„ i1 N , f Cl.• •U :L 0U O 0 y 0 '5 to U M>~ • C'i g W U O W -2 E C. y�" C U et el ottiA 7 '��gg.�o•Z Li•� it 2 S co o a� t~ CD oo coy o a`i o aoo ao\ p UWU co WA E-iP4U� CZ�� CZ '--N of \O r 00 — N 0000 0000000 0 0 r r r r o0 00 00 00 00 00 0o c\ o\ 0 0 0 0 000,0000 0 0 Transfers Out 108,616,865.32 Grand Totals 1 COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DAVID R. GEHR COMMISSIONER Mr. Elmer C. Hodge Roanoke County P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Dear Mr. Hodge: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1401 EAST BROAD STREET RICHMOND, 23219 March 9, 1998 JAMES S. GIVENS STATE SECONDARY ROADS ENGINEER The enclosed report contains a list of all changes to the Secondary System of State Highways in your county approved by the State Secondary Roads Engineer in February 1998. All additions to and abandonments from the Secondary System are effective the day they are approved by the State Secondary Roads Engineer. This date appears in the far right column of the monthly report. These changes will be presented to the Commonwealth Transportation Board at its monthly meeting on March 19, 1998. If you have any questions or comments about this report, please call Martin Law at 786-7399. JSG/MII James S. Givens y% State Secondary Roads Engineer WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING Report of Changes to the Secondary System of State Highways 0 0 Street Name 00 o) M 0.07 Mile Northwest Route 1775 Route 1775 0 0 w ou 0 O b Net Mileage Chang ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ' « ." 1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 24, 1998. AGENDA ITEMS: Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investments and Portfolio Policy, as of February 28, 1998. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: BANKERS ACCEPTANCE: CENTRAL FIDELITY 991,608.34 CRAIGIE 1,784,465.06 CRESTAR 990,620.00 FIRST UNION 990,934.72 SUNTRUST 1,982,386.67 6,740,014.79 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSITS: FIRST AMERICAN SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA SAVINGS & LOAN 100, 000.00 100,000.00 COMMERICAL PAPER: CENTRAL FIDELITY 992,185.56 CRAIGIE 990,916.67 CRESTAR 990,934.72 FIRST UNION 991,870.00 PAINE-WEBBER 1,982,385.00 WHEAT 1ST 993,944.44 GOVERNMENT NATIONS 1,993,219.75 WHEAT 1ST 1,982,562.22 LOCAL GOV'T INVESTMENT POOL: GENERAL FUND RESOURCE AUTHORITY MONEY MARKET: CRESTAR CASH INVESTMENTS: CENTRAL FIDELITY COMMONWEALTH (GEN. OPER) COMMONWEALTH (RES. AUTH.) TOTAL 200, 000.00 6,942,236.39 3,975,781.97 9, 860, 269.15 1,677,652.56 11, 537, 921.71 7,212,708.55 7,212,708.55 2, 000, 000.00 4, 831, 600.49 5,190, 002.23 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Respec IIy Submitte y Approved ed C. Anderson El er C. Hodge ,County Treasurer 12,021,602.72 48,630,266.13 ACTION Approved () Motion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To () County Administrator Harrison Johnson McNamara Minnix Nickens VOTE No Yes Abs Item No. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, 5204 BERNARD DRIVE, SW., ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: March 24, 1998 AGENDA ITEM: Work session on Roanoke County's Economic Development Strategy, 2000 and Beyond COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Roanoke County has an existing Economic Development Strategy that sets forth an overall strategy and process for creating and retaining jobs, encouraging new business locations and existing business expansions, providing sites and buildings for such companies and encouraging the development of tourism. The Strategy examines the background of economic development, the roles of other economic development groups in the Roanoke Valley and the relationship to the Comprehensive Plan. Program areas for existing industry development, new business attraction, tourism and community development, are presented. Each program area describes a mission statement, goals and objectives, program activities and impact measures. Key strategies are identified to define the importance of the Economic Development Strategy and its relationship to the budget process and annual activity report. Staff is requesting that the Board of Supervisors review the draft of the Economic Development Strategy and make appropriate comments so that the Strategy may be finalized for adoption at a subsequent Board meeting Respectfully submitted: Approved: Timothy W. Gubla, Director Elmer C. Hodge Department of Economic Development County Administrator 0-1 F conomic Development strategy 2000 and Beyond Table of Contents Page Overview 1 Background and Process 3 Relationship to Comprehensive Plan 4 Existing Industry Development 5 Program Strategy 5 Business Attraction 8 Program Strategy 9 Tourism 11 Program Strategy 11 Community Development 14 Program Strategy 14 Key Strategies 16 Overview Roanoke County adopted its first Economic Development Strategy in 1985 setting forth program goals and objectives for the Office of Economic Development. The Strategy was subsequently revised and readopted as the County expanded its roles and responsibilities in economic development. A separate Department of Economic Development was established in 1988 and an economic development mission was adopted for the Department as part of the 1988 Economic Development Strategy; "To serve as the prime County contact for prospective new and expanded business and industrial developments within the Roanoke Valley, to evaluate related opportunities, and to encourage tourism and all forms of economic development. The most recent Strategy, adopted by the Board of Supervisors in 1992, serves as a working document for staff activities and program initiatives. It focused on the areas of new business attraction, retention and expansion of existing business and industry, product development and travel and tourism. While the Strategy is reviewed and revised annually by the Board, those four program areas remain the prime focus of the Department of Economic Development. These program areas support economic development in Roanoke County which is defined by the American Economic Development Council as; "the process of creating wealth through the mobilization of human, financial, capital, physical and natural resources to generate marketable goods and services." The County's Department of Economic Development is one of several public and private organizations that carries out economic development activities in the Roanoke Valley. Each local government has its own economic development office or department. Other partners for Roanoke County include a regional economic development marketing organization; the Roanoke Valley Economic Development Partnership (RVEDP) and a tourism destination marketing organization (DMO); the Roanoke Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau (RVCVB). These two regional organizations have linkages to the Virginia Economic Development Partnership (VEDP) to assist them in marketing the Roanoke Valley. The Roanoke Valley Economic Development Partnership's mission is; "to create in this region, new industrial and commercial investment and jobs while maintaining existing jobs." The Partnership serves as the single point of contact for companies seeking information on sites and buildings in the Roanoke Valley. Other economic development support for regional and local government economic development is provided by specific programs provided by such groups as: • The Blue Ridge Small Business Development Center (SBDC) - counseling and training for small business owners seeking to expand 1 • Total Action Against Poverty (TAP) - counseling and training for prospective business start- ups and access to microenterprise loans • New Century Venture Center - regional small business incubator • Virginia's A.L. Philpott Manufacturing Extension Partnership - technical and management assistance for manufacturers. General support for economic development is provided from the business community through such organizations as the Roanoke Regional Chamber of Commerce, the Salem -Roanoke County Chamber of Commerce and the Vinton Chamber of Commerce. Other economic development assistance is provided by economic development staff of the Norfolk Southern Railroad and the American Electric Power (AEP) Company. These two organizations have specific expertise that assists business with rail transportation questions and electric service. 2 Background and Process Roanoke County's current Economic Development Strategy guides the activities of the County's economic development programs. Several significant events have occurred in the County since the Strategy was adopted in 1992 that should be considered for this Strategy revision. These include the readoption of the County's Zoning Ordinance (1994), the adoption of a Vision for Roanoke County (1995) and the completion of a "round" of community meetings which were held to obtain input for the update of the County's current Comprehensive Plan, adopted in 1985. There has been significant economic activity since 1992 with 103 new industrial and commercial locations and expansions. New sites and industrial and business parks have been developed. New industrial and commercial buildings have been constructed. The issue for Roanoke County is to identify and maintain a "product" inventory of available industrial and commercial sites and building which the RVEDP can market. The County has developed the 177-acre Valley TechPark as a publicly owned industrial park and has participated in a public private partnership to develop Valley Gateway Business Park (108 acres) since 1992. The Board of Supervisors has provided financial support as "incentives" to both commercial and industrial prospects to assist with public infrastructure and site development. A key issue for the Board and staff is to achieve a "payback" from new tax revenues in return for an investment of public funds in an economic development project. Attracting and retaining jobs that pay salaries and wages above $10 per hour is a critical review factor for any potential partnership. There have been significant public infrastructure improvements since 1992. The County has completed construction of the Spring Hollow Reservoir which provides 23 million gallons per day (MGD) for County citizens. The regional sewage treatment plant is being expanded to treat 45 MGD. Roanoke County has entered into a cost sharing agreement with four other Valley governments to complete this project. Other economic development events have occurred within the Roanoke Valley region during this same time period. An extensive strategic planning process, organized by the New Century Council with over 600 volunteers, has prepared a regional strategic plan with an action agenda for implementation. The RVCVB has completed a plan and process for tourism accreditation by the Commonwealth (1995). The strategic plan of the RVEDP was also revised in 1997. The Commonwealth of Virginia has reorganized its economic development efforts during 1996 by transferring the functions of the Virginia Department of Economic Development into two agencies; a new public private partnership to market the Commonwealth, the Virginia Economic Development Partnership, and a new State agency; the Department of Business Assistance. The Partnership handles prospect relationships on behalf of the Commonwealth. A board of citizens 3 appointed by the Governor oversees the operations of the Partnership. A Virginia Tourism Corporation (VTC) has been incorporated as part of the Partnership. The VTC board has membership from the Partnership's board as well as travel and tourism industry representation. The net effect of the changes in infrastructure, local visioning, new regional and state programs and organizations requires a review of the program focus and direction for economic development in Roanoke County. The 2000 And Beyond Strategy seeks to recognize and incorporate these changes so as to move the County's economic development program into the 21 st century. Relationship to Comprehensive Plan The Planning and Zoning Department is in the process of updating the County's 1985 Comprehensive Plan.. Areas planned for existing and future industrial and commercial uses, economic opportunity areas and community development initiatives will be depicted in the Comprehensive Plan. There will be broad statements that set forth the County's goals for economic development. The Economic Development Strategy is intended to implement these goals with a series of programs that can be adjusted annually by the Board of Supervisors and "retargeted" as opportunities and/or threats occur for the future economic well being of Roanoke County. 4 Existing Industry Development A cornerstone of Roanoke County's economic development efforts is existing industry development. It is often said that nationally "50-75% of new jobs in a community come from existing business expansions" This program element was first initiated in 1985 when the County established an economic development office. The Board of Supervisors also has followed the policy that the County should treat existing and new business the same. The County staff maintains close contacts with its existing businesses through an annual visitation program, executive calls, and public recognitions through ground breakings, grand openings and ribbon cuttings. Business inquiries range from information requests to considerations for incentives. The Economic Development Department relies upon other County Departments to mediate or resolve development related issues, local taxation questions and County Code interpretations that affect a pending expansion decision. The Virginia Department of Business Assistance is a ready partner that provides expertise for the County staff in dealing with issues regarding the Commonwealth of Virginia. The Public Private Partnership Policy, readopted by the Board of Supervisors in November 1996, reaffirms the County's commitment to invest public funds for public infrastructure and training assistance that facilitate the expansion of an existing industry if there is a "payback" of new taxes within the time limits of the policy. The policy is weighted towards assisting manufacturing companies; commercial uses have a year to meet their tax generation target. Existing Industry Development Program Strategy MISSION: To create an effective business environment which fosters the growth and prosperity of existing business and industry and to communicate the availability of a variety of supporting resources. GOAL: To maintain a healthy prosperous economic base of existing businesses in Roanoke County. OBJECTIVES: 1. To assist in increasing demand for local products and services 2. To help to reduce the cost of doing business in order to increase profits and promote growth 3. To assist with regulatory requirements, connecting with technical and other resources 5 4. To increase the public awareness of the economic impact of the County's commercial and industrial (economic) base 5. To assist in the maintenance of a fully trained, competent workforce. ACTIVITIES: 1. Focus the County's existing industry visitation program to complete annual calls to those County located industry clusters that are dominant in the Roanoke Valley. These include printing, transportation, electronics. Identify the appropriate follow-up to present solutions to specific needs. 2. Develop and distribute information which provides details and sources of resources available in the area ( for example: job training, financing, local and state permitting etc.) 3. Support business assistance programs such as Blue Ridge Small Business Development Center, Service Corps of Retired Executives (SCORE), A.L. Philpott Manufacturing Center, and Virginia Asset Financing Corporation. Refer or involve these groups as needed to assist existing businesses. 4. Carry out a year round industry recognition program which provides exposure and appreciation for the economic base in Roanoke County 5. Maintain linkages with the Virginia Department of Business Assistance to resolve issues raised on industry calls that relate to state government, identify financing sources, and export trade information on potential international markets, ISO 9000 issues, education and legal matters 6. Maintain and develop linkages with private utilities such as American Electric Power Company, Roanoke Gas, Bell Atlantic and other telecommunications providers to address service issues and concerns that may arise on industry calls 7. Maintain and develop linkages with the Virginia Employment Commission (VEC), Fifth District Employment & Training Consortium (FDETC), and Workforce Services, Virginia Department of Business Assistance to identify employment and training resources that can be used to respond to issues raised by existing companies when a call is made 8. Maintain an inventory of available buildings and sites that can be referred to existing businesses for their consideration as an expansion possibility. 6 IMPACT MEASURES: 1. Increase in new jobs created by existing industries 2. Increase in capital expenditures and/or space occupied by existing business and industry 3. Increase number of skilled employees 4. Increase number of employees with wages/salaries above $10.00 per hour 5. Increase in percentage of sales by existing companies in both domestic and foreign export markets 6. Increase in local tax receipts from such sources as: sales tax, Machinery and Tools, business personal property, transient occupancy, and personal property. 7 Business Attraction An important element of Roanoke County's economic development mission is the attraction of new business to the community. This activity is realized through the assistance of the Roanoke Valley Economic Development Partnership; the regional marketing organization that serves as the prime contact for business inquiries about location opportunities for the Roanoke Valley. The County does not market itself as a separate entity, it markets itself as being part of the Roanoke Valley. Inquiries to the Partnership from the Virginia Economic Development Partnership, site location consultants and business are referred to each locality for site and building recommendations. Local government's maintain an inventory of "product"; industrial and commercial sites and buildings that can be matched with each inquiry. The Roanoke County Economic Development Department maintains a site and building inventory, but one of the challenges facing the Department is the ability to identify potential sites for addition to the inventory. Prior to the 1980's industrial uses were not encouraged as land uses and industrial sites were relegated to areas adjacent to the railroad lines or in the flood plain along the Roanoke River. The 1985 County Comprehensive Plan identified general areas for commercial and industrial development but the actual site identification did not occur until the new Zoning Ordinance was adopted in 1993. Several potential commercial and industrial sites were rezoned appropriately when the Zoning Ordinance Map was adopted. Other sites considered for economic development uses are not zoned appropriately. The Department, in conjunction with the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County, has initiated rezoning action to change the zoning designations of key sites for industrial and commercial uses. Both Valley TechPark and Valley Gateway are examples of the success of this program. The transformation of an industrial zoned property into an industrial park requires time, funding and creativity. For example, Valley TechPark became a reality when the Board of Supervisors included $750,000 for site development purposes in the 1992 Bond Referendum. This sum was matched with a $25,000 Rural Economic Development (RED) grant, $450,000 from the Virginia Department of Transportation's Industrial Access Road Fund program, $60,000 of "excess" VDOT Revenue Sharing funds, $150,000 of Federal funds from Congressman Boucher through the Virginia Department of Housing and Community Development, and $85,000 of Roanoke County Utility Department funds. The site infrastructure for public water and sewer, storm water detention and the industrial access road was completed in early 1995. Subsequently, Rusco Windows of Roanoke and R.R. Donnelley & Sons located their facilities with the assistance of additional public funds for site development under the terms of the County's public private partnership policy. Staff continues to develop working relationship with private property owners, Realtors and developers to enhance the development of commercial sites in the various primary road corridors in Roanoke County. 8 The continued challenge is to identify, market and develop sites so that the "product" inventory can meet the needs of future economic development inquiries. To further this purpose, Roanoke County purchased a 456 acre tract in western Roanoke County for development for corporate and technology based companies to locate. This property is adjacent to Interstate I-81 and close to Virginia Tech and the terminus of the Smart Road being constructed in Montgomery County. There is also on ongoing effort with the Town of Vinton to market their McDonald Farm property for mixed uses. A consulting firm has been hired to prepare a marketing feasibility study of this 100-acre site. Business Attraction Program Strategy MISSION: To aggressively seek new business development and investment in Roanoke County. GOAL: To carry out a coordinated program to target and attract compatible business and industry to locate in Roanoke County that will increase the commercial and industrial tax base and related employment opportunities. OBJECTIVES: 1. To achieve a balance in the proportion of the commercial and industrial tax base with residential in Roanoke County 2. To create new jobs that pay wages/salaries above $10.00 per hour 3. To build upon the industry clusters in the economic base by attracting new companies which provide services and products needed by the base 4. To maintain a diversity of the types of businesses within the economic base to provide for stability and a broad selection of employment opportunities for citizens. ACTIVITIES: 1. Support the efforts of the Roanoke Valley Economic Development Partnership to market and promote the area as a Mid -Atlantic location in the eastern United States for technology (electronics and fiber optics), transportation, printing and suburban offices 2. Identify from the site and building inventory, suitable locations for those businesses seeking to relocate or expand into Roanoke County 9 O -1 3. Identify potential commercial and industrial sites and work with the property owner, community and County staff to have the property zoned for an appropriate commercial or industrial use 4. Identify and fund public private partnerships for new businesses 5. Plan and develop the Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology in western Roanoke County as a future site for new technology based businesses seeking to locate on the I-81 corridor 6. Maintain a close working relationship with Virginia Tech so that the University might provide professional and technical support for new business locations 7. Support the small business development efforts of Total Action Against Poverty (TAP), the Small Business Development Center and other groups so that entrepreneurs are encouraged to locate a small business start-up in Roanoke County. IMPACT MEASURES: 1. Improved balance of commercial and industrial tax base versus residential and tax exempt in Roanoke County 2. Continued low unemployment rate for the County and Roanoke Valley region as compared to the Commonwealth of Virginia 3. Increase in number of location inquiries with a corresponding increase in location decisions for Roanoke County 4. Continued improvement of six and scale of industry clusters. 10 Tourism Roanoke County has been a regional partner in developing tourism opportunities in the Roanoke Valley. The tourism market segments are conventions, leisure travel and group tours. The County's geographic position in the Valley determines its role in developing these market segments. There are six I-81 interchanges located within the County, as well as the Blue Ridge Parkway and other primary roads. The Roanoke Regional Airport is conveniently located close to the County's border. Travelers using either air or automobile transportation are drawn to the urban center for its concentration of hotels, restaurants, shopping and attractions. During the past decade, shopping, restaurant and travel services have developed in the County close to I-81 and other primary roads. Travelers now have choices and cross jurisdictional boundaries to seek the services they desire. Roanoke County tourism businesses can "intercept" the traveler on the Interstate or Parkway and offer a range of travel related services. Roanoke County can further its position in the tourism development of the Roanoke Valley by developing "tourism product". The County has played a key role in supporting the development of Virginia's Explore Park in eastern Roanoke County. This destination location will be accessed in 1998 by the new Roanoke River Parkway. Explore is finalizing internal infrastructure improvements for parking, internal roads and new buildings that will enhance visitor experiences. The growth of "tourism infrastructure" has been supported through the identification of commercial sites in the I-81 corridor and the development of restaurant and hotel projects that support leisure travel activities. The growing greenway movement in the Roanoke Valley will receive a "boost" when the Hanging Rock Battlefield Trail is constructed in 1998. This project will not only provide a bicycle and pedestrian link between this area of the County and the City of Salem, but will recognize a Civil War battlefield. Interest in Civil War topics is a key attraction for visitors to Virginia so this project should have a positive influence on tourism in the Roanoke Valley. Tourism Program Strategy MISSION: To develop and implement plans and programs to attract visitors to Roanoke County. GOAL: To increase the number of visitors to Roanoke County. 11 OBJECTIVES: 1. To increase the average length of stay of visitors in Roanoke County 2. To increase travel related expenditures 3. To increase tourism product in Roanoke County 4. To increase tourism infrastructure in Roanoke County. ACTIVITIES: 1. Work closely with the Roanoke Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau and the Virginia Tourism Corporation to market the Roanoke Valley as a destination location for leisure travelers, bus and group tours, conventions and business travelers 2. Support the operations of Virginia's Explore Park as it develops into a regional destination attraction (product development) 3. Pursue the development of special events sponsored by the Parks and Recreation Department that use Green Hill Park and other County locations as a venue for seasonal outdoor recreation activities (i.e. Ed and Sandy Lee Statewide Rugby Tournament, Roanoke Symphony Volunteer Association Polo Match) 4. Support the location and development of that portion of the regional greenway system in the County; i.e. Hanging Rock Battlefield Trail, Garst Mill Greenway 5. Promote the development of the six interchange areas on I-81 so that leisure travelers may find a range of travel services and accommodations for their needs (tourism infrastructure) 6. Support the efforts to improve signage, install low band radio and to locate a regional visitors center to draw travelers from the four Blue Ridge Parkway access points into the Roanoke Valley 7. Support efforts to develop Virginia Mountain Country as a private conference and outdoor recreation venue (tourism infrastructure) 8. Support regional special events such as the Trebark Archery Shooters Association Pro -Am Tournament, Tour DuPont, mountain biking, NCAA Division III football, baseball and basketball championships and the Commonwealth Games (tourism product) 12 9. Support and promote private destination locations such as Dixie Caverns (tourism product) 10. Support the efforts of the Hanging Rock Battlefield and Railway Preservation Foundation to recognize the Hanging Rock Battlefield (1864) as a tourism destination (tourism product) 11. Recognize that viewsheds, vistas and scenic areas are essential ingredients in the experiences of travelers to the Roanoke Valley and support efforts to preserve and protect these features (tourism product) 12. Support the efforts of the National D-Day Foundation to develop the national D- Day Memorial at their site in adjacent Bedford County. (tourism product). IMPACT MEASURES: 1. Increase in meal and transient occupancy tax receipts 2. Increase in admissions tax receipts 3. Increase in attendance at Virginia's Explore Park 4. Increase in number of visitor/inquires recorded at Roanoke Valley Visitors Center 5. Increase in hotel/motel occupancy rates/average length of stay 6. Increase in number of group/tour package and convention requests and actual group/tour/conventions. 13 Community Development A new role for the Department of Economic Development is the support of community development activities in the County. This broad topic recognizes that the community is the economic development product that is being promoted. The efforts of the staff to support the development of Virginia's Explore Park, the Hanging Rock Battlefield Trail, and the development of the Roanoke County Center for Research and Technology have resulted in the formation of new approaches in working with citizens who reside in communities where those projects are located. The Williamson Road mini -grant program (managed by the Department of Planning & Zoning) and the Petition for Public Works projects (managed by the Utility Department) provides models for community development applications in other geographic areas of Roanoke County. Community Development Program Strategy MISSION: To create an effective mechanism whereby County officials can work together with citizens to develop or preserve their desired community in its economic and social dimensions. GOAL: To recognize the community as the economic development product. OBJECTIVES: 1. To develop or identify programs and projects that improve specific geographic communities in Roanoke County 2. To work with civic leagues to implement County programs and projects as requested 3. To work with businesses and property owners to implement County programs and projects as requested. ACTIVITIES: 1. Continue the Williamson Road mini -grant program in order to improve the physical appearance of businesses in the County portion of the Williamson Road corridor 14 2. Develop a planning process whereby "communities" can request County assistance to develop or preserve their community with programs and projects 3. Form an internal County "team" composed of members from Economic Development, Planning & Zoning, Utilities, Community Relations, Parks and Recreation and other Departments (as needed) to determine the level and type of County assistance for community development and target geographic areas of the County 4. Authorize funds for the development of a Master Plan for the Hanging Rock area to improve the appearance of existing properties and to redevelop vacant properties in order to build upon the public funds invested with the Hanging Rock Battlefield Trail 5. Develop a Community Development Training Academy for civic leagues, citizens and business leaders to access County assistance, programs and projects in a proactive manner. IMPACT MEASURES: 1. Improvement in physical appearance of property 2. Increase in real estate assessments due to application of County programs. 3. Increase in new business locations and/or expansions of businesses in designated Community Development areas. 4. Positive citizen responses for community development projects 5. Increase in local tax receipts from such sources as: sales tax, personal property, and business license. 15 Key Strategies Upon adoption of the Economic Development Strategy the Department of Economic Development recommends that the Board of Supervisors also adopt the following Key Strategies: 1. Incorporate the Economic Development Strategy into the annual budget review process and into the annual review and update of the Capital Improvements Program (CIP) by prioritizing objectives and activities as set forth in the Strategy, and by requesting that the staff provide to the Board at the beginning of the calendar year an annual report (The Economic Development Annual Activity Report that analyzes the manner by which each of the program areas in the Strategy has been addressed and how each program area is anticipated to be accomplished in the year ahead). 2. Forward the Economic Development Strategy to the Planning and Zoning Department for due consideration and coordination as part of the Comprehensive Plan update. 3. Recognize that Roanoke County government should consistently facilitate a regulatory process that not only encourages but enhances the expansion of existing business and the attraction of new business to Roanoke County. 16 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 24,1998 AGENDA ITEM: Budget Work Session on the Upcoming Annual Budget for FY 1998-99. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This time has been set aside for a joint budget work session with the Roanoke County School Board and School Administration. The School Board will present their budget scenarios and review funding issues related to school needs. State code dictates that the local School Board present the County Board of Supervisors a budget by April 1. Code also stipulates that the Board of Supervisors must adopt the School budget by May 1. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, Brent Robertson Budget Manager Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved () Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied () Harrison Received () Johnson Referred O McNamara To () Minnix Nickens se, 46 OFFICE OF DIVISION SUPERINTENDENT 5937 Cove Road j Roanoke, Virginia 24019 Phone: (540) 562-3700 Fax: (540) 562-3994 Elmer Hodge, County Administrator Roanoke County Board of Supervisors OUNTy °ent 5% March 20, 1998 TO: FROM: i' anna Gordon, Superintendent Jerry Hardy, Director of Budget and Data Management SUBJECT: School Operating Budget 1998-99 Under cover of this memorandum we are forwarding documents for your review as we prepare for the joint budget worksession on March 24, 1998. You will find enclosed a copy of the Non Salary Budget Proposal as recommended by the Non Salary Budget Committee. We are also presenting a summary of projected revenues and a spread sheet showing four expenditure summaries that have been reviewed with the School Board. We believe that these projections provide a good context for our discussions on Tuesday evening. If we can respond to questions prior to the meeting on Tuesday, we would be pleased to hear from you. If there is additional information that would be helpful, please let us know. c: Roanoke County School Board o0 rn 0 N M O ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOLS BUDGET YEAR 1998-99 Budget Worksheet School Operating Fund BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE INCOME: 1997-98 1998-99 (DECREASE) 0) e-LOti(.0I,-NI1-d (0 (0 NCO (0 N 1- 14) 00 v- N N N- �.- 0 O (01 O OOry v (0 tO 0) I 0' ' I-- N 0 (0 N N� O 0 7f i 0 0 I0 i� N 01 d LC)' N MI Cl N� tp M r-MMto,(fl,1 0)�O0N000(OLC)— N-OOr-�(01-0) N-- c- CO Lc) (0 cr CO to 0 N N- e- CD (0 e- (0I N. 1 f- N 1'Y N- 1- CD . N-. N O N. (f) 0 00 00 (0 N co . ) ti 1-O 01- M00 N to - LC) N N N (f) N- Cr) LC) 14)i 1 ID (01 rLj r- (01 01 m 29,853,716 7,941, 509 37,795,225 i 137,388 1 45,230,473 Dental Insurance Appropriation 287,025 Other Funds: 478,752 State Funds: Projections based on 14,000 ADM Basic Aide State Sales Tax --- -- --- Reading_ Intervention Dropout Prevention SOL Teaching Materials j Remediation Additional Teachers Health Incentive Fund Truancy _ Total - State Funds [Federal Funds: Local Funds: County Appropriation co co N 0) O INCREASE (DECREASE) 1,620 000 o g 888Ai N .- M CD 444 2,262,835 236,976 C �p a, N 01 O - - 6 000 48,780 (_2,467 24,510 10,760 (106,509) 2625 126,930 57,0741 8I 11,448 20,000 (71274) 35,211 9 625, NQggO N`` oo o Q �� N N O VI Mi'0 N' 'n, I Nl C, � � } m li n Iti 89,932 414,560_ 817,862 46,276 77,610 232,325 -__11 547,920 190 520 634,650 597 790 3,574,188 130,000 N � NJ 0) < .0aOa 0) fD CO N7 618,278 48 125 3,481,210 547 646 0 250,000 70 302 84,320 493,916 -_ _----_155,064 S VI Cd. N 0. 0 DI, ' p mo (200,000) 6,180,976 11,078,406 10Q000 636 835 _ (380.000 70,185 072_ 236 975 QQ 2'j N a'p fD 1�. ( { p�p T 510,848 817 862 46 276 77 610 01 fl 1 N 193,126 634650 -_ 5997 790 W W 8, M� 57 241 649,951 2,972,414 618,278 48,125 y481,210 547,646 550 000 250,000 -__ 197,735 84 320 Q? toil!J O. hi O co co j g . N DY 'Mi '" BUDGET -3 1998-99 3% 52,768,855 0 6,180,976 11,078,406 COM M CD 70,665,072 236,976 O N �Oq� QI O1 510,848 817,862 46,276 77,610 232,325 1 547,920 193,126 634,650 597,790 nr- or M 57,241 649,951 2,972,414 618,278 48,125 3,481,210 547,646 550,000 250,000 17,320r 79,320 tD r I NI i N IS to 41 BUDGET-1 BUDGET-2 1998.99 1998-99 1.25% 2.25% 52,363,855 0 6,135,976 11,001,906 636 835 70,138,572 N N Additional Personnel Sub -Total I 7649976 Iti 510,848 817,862 46,276 77,610 222 325 1,547,920 193 1126 634,650 597,790 Ol l+1 57 241 _ 649 951 2,972,414 618,2781 48,125, 51,823 855 0 6,075,976 10,899,906 636,835 69,436,572 nall CD N 3 0 N 89,932 408,660 769,082 48,743 53,100 221,565 1,654,429 187,895 507,720 540,716 CO r� v{ co 45,793 629,951 2 968,688 US m») N ENDITURES: BUDGET 1997-98 SALARY & RELATED COSTS (3% Average ) 51,148,855 0 6,000,976 10,772,406 67,922.237 Salary & Additional Personnel Subtotal--1 DEPARTMENTAL REQUESTS Classroom Instruction Assistant Superintendent(78) Instructional Programs (79) Office of the Assistant Supt. (80) Educational Testing / Remediation (81) _ Educational Testing Remediation Vocational Education (82) Pupil Personnel Services (83) Guidance (,861___ Media Services (87) Support Services Transportation (74) Facilities & Operations (75) Mobile Classrooms / Capital Needs Central Support School Board (70) Office of the Supt. (71) Budget & Data Management (72) Risk Management - Workers Corn. & P&C Insurance Activity Fund Audit Renewal Ten Buses @ 55,000 each Student Scheduling& Attendance Software/Hardware Staff Development (85) RAO Assignment 188) Special Programs Summer School (77) Adult Education (90) §a O a n C .2 Z 2 N C Teaching Personnel Reductions Administrative (76) - $60,000 per 1% Classified (89) - $102,000 per 1% Adjust Janitorial Salaries by .50/Hr. VRS Retirement Increase (12.29% to 13.49%) VRS Life Insurance Premium Holiday Salary Package Sub -Total Additional Personnel _- Instructional Positions (8) Technology Specialists (4) Nursing Positions (7) a x W k m 2 :La. E co o as 14-1 cn cp I off) c ma o m zco t Committee Members I= co Herman L. Horn Elementary School Zr)L L 4-J 4-1 U U rn O U c 7 0 V 0 a) t c °o ro . O c • L • < E 0 •• •. co• . 4J . to . ' . . . � a • • _ o : o : : • • • • •o • r . County Finance s • ea . . • • • • • can . .0 • . . V . a)C o • 3 ••• .c • • . . 63 RI • W • a re : 1-ai c -a C L f c .0 p >` O c g o C c _ oL°)-OU>o U a 3a=� C7ra OY�a)V _Y< =P� nc E a) c �2O O.H'- V o >'•-o Z. L' o> 03 EO —a)E OO OO C10 O C b C cu �ea= V . 0 ♦ ■ ■ ■ ♦ ■ ■ Q ■ re ■ • V ■ O■ ♦ ♦ ♦ • 0 Z w 1173 w in 0 mo i to u) ra w w a) E E 0 V 4.J No co ro cn 1 0 z ♦ Committee Priorities Core Instructional Programs ■ Other Instructional Areas and Athletics ■ Administration ■ ♦ Broad Recommendation ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOLS - NON SALARY BUDGET SUMMARY 03/04/98 FY 1998-99 p Z LL FZ-, W a a J 0 Q I CJ v; EXPENDITURES: INCOMING DEPT. COMM. ACTUAL BUDGET REQUESTS REC. REC. SUPT'S REC INCREASE PERCENT r1EPARTMENTAL REQUESTS 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1998-99 1998-99 1998-99 (DECREASE) INC (DEC) 1.1% 25.0% a 1 :0 1 ;:L ''tl) 0 N a 0 O) 7 (D 0 V c0 0 0 O N N tl)I 0 el 0 COO 0�7 0 o �I, O .i C�11 25.0% 3.2% 25.8% i r c 7)( a 9.311.518 9,801.920 0 2,272,711 __- 30.2% '10 ;coo ',� 0 O a 0 t[)I 1" �i oil ^, 576,655 493,916 127,593 155,064 155,064 0 ( o�l u`S co Lo ri 210.4za 57,074 487,739_ 544,813 11,448 20,000 0 ,_'?I (.n)n, h.':.-11 o own 00o N4 ov CO0 (2,467) 24,510 10,760 0 n1 o o •• 5,231 126,930 a a1 01 o 0) 0 el co; n 0) " 4151..549 597,790 N 0) ov co 8,467,673] L 547,735 O0) CD 510,8481 � 817,8621 46,276 77,610 C 23 193,126 634,650 COI N 110 CDCOCA C�)I0 t()0 8,448,816 73,600 90,932 789,711 817,862 WO,-. NO (0N 473,075 1,557,920 238,126 773,459 79,320 Subtotal------------ 463.755 521,3$7 731.719 TOTAL SCHOOL OPERATING NON -SALARY EXPEND.------- 133.718.7_39 16,006.626 20.371,6133 5..383..474 614,050 N N 0) O co) N n O) Vi 59,831 649,951 8,448,816 73,600 90,932 819,565 l-- - 817,862 46,276 68,002 809,392 L 1,658,707 244,009 828,729 53,257 Subtotal - 1541015 3.941_126 -------- - -- Support Services Transportation (74) 651,625 540,716 Facilities & Operations (75) 3,229,126 3,474,188 70,302 N (1) 0 ai 0o 408,660 769,082 co)]; Nr n ao v 53,100 221,565 1,654,429 187,895 507,720 0) coo 0) 10 55,9501 to a 011 vn co 0 34,010 op 10 R 211,439 1,389,827 158,974 495,754 PUDil Assignment / Census (88) 1 - Subtotal ---------- Central Support School Board (70) Office of the Supt. (71) Budget & Data Management (72) )1.3 01 0 N 1.1 1 co I r r 0 1« , N I e '� : , iU 1 Assistant Supt. For Program Support(78) Instructional Programs (79) Assistant Suot. For Administration (80) T Educational Testing / Remediation (81) Educ. Testing Remediation Vocational Education (82) Pupil Personnel Services (83) Guidance (86) Media Services (87) rI / ' Y \ \ � ` N Assistant Superintendent For Program Support (78) O H W V1 LLl W a' cc U W 2 � W cocc 2 a, N W 2 c 2 UJ a W 111 UJ 2 2 0 U 2 w? O te J Is Q U a DESCRIPTION VS 0 O Q N 0 0l 0 0 O 0 8 O 8 8 8 0 0000 00010 0 0 ca ca CO 3-3 O O O O 5 0 .�y a- o m Am 0 O 0 8 O To` els O O 0 o v 0 32 0 CD Y 04. 0 Yf 8 8 0 0 8 O Y N C4 N 8 csi 8 N t00 in in00 y uco con Col N cO N •0 1 TOTAL DEPARTMENT N o 3 N pl co �r m e 3 A 88o M 8 • • t Y M r ▪ A i s 1 s 9 $ 3 1 a N e9! N aa O M al .c s g o w orbG ea w N {3 41 30c O a e • w.. LLa e c ei Ne a.es � °a C t C ✓ • V C Cal m • 2 mg a —0c 1 = M a° rz • el �g E; a i Aa mg m E t "= E g g � o re ay a Or A c Sa a r e a5 os Eo2 z mc°i>p E Fo •<S 0 N 0 2 Instructional Programs W O.mg 0 V W . r H CO W q Ca mt Q W Ms Uq INDEX DESCRIPTION om CIO N N 0-0)- ,0 N N N 0 O c _ 0 .6 o o'olco e O O O 0 O NI O N N O N O N N 1 00,0 N (O co co fco o 810 A m0)M •- M 8 C'! O 010 fG M 88 0 l'7 0co IM in N C c c aa $W gg ON M M 8 0 8 8 co f OOg 00 22 M O;O O O O O 0 0 O COIN O C) N 00IO O 0 (0 0 01 OO 0 N n 0 0 0 'o c) m M 792030 General Sec Education 0'l0 0100'0 0 0 011 of o .-I O O M O O cc) N 0100 (1) O CO N 8 N °00 W CO Q O O O O O O O 010 R N IM 0 0 O O O O O O 1 I' II 2 co 0 � O NN (D NIN I NM n o(4 co vler � N i H 12 BM O 0 O 0) CO O 7 OTT O d C S C) O 2a°2 gg— A We,gm Vgg N m a � c g 00 INDEX DESCRIPTION O.100 N^I 0100 0) 000 0 , 0 0 O 0 3- 1A Cr; O Y n v 0) 111 0.. Hp 05 TdSms '3 2 N W N H 0. adg 00. :7 co n < 80 OO OO)10/0 0IM OW n N O 0) 0 v 100 4; w cm 0.32 1n y c O 2 N . nF-5c N 0 mo 0;'0 00,0 N ON' O O 0088 0 00 0) n 0 .- N 0'O 0 N 8 'a, 0 O Q O N 0 N 3 N N Q O a N O7 O i._ O 0 0 0 O 0 0 8 N O 00 0 N 0 N 0 O 0 0 co 4) OI00000Fil rZoao Rr. co o1�O)r. N 1') Cr/ 1- 1') 7 O I N I 0 1f) CO 0) ] ..I 0 0) < N O O Q�^ 0.010 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 8 O) 0 1') 0000000 1'I 0 0 0 0 0) O IqLs cy;nl�L' E-•2a U� 22o tpd1 cal To' c O,w1. 'y 0'od N v)1L'Ia H0 0 N 10 1') CO 01 M V 0 IOW) CO 0.01 -. N O) 0, 10j10 CO 0 0 8 M 0 tV 08 O O) 8 m 08 O CO - CO 0 0 1'f 0 0 O w Y O) O 0 0 M O O v O) O 3 A O ww 22 SS0 O 0 V. O.- N 0 00 0.i0 N M 0 0) 1`i t0 .c74 Of ON +) 0101 0 0 0 0 O)i1 0 0 NIQ! 10 N O) 0 O O GG 0 col v) o' 0°D 10 M co 0 O) 010 N I 0N00 0010,01 00)) In c a3)� 9 Z ce w tE FAH giwwl N_ 11 0) h O) c c ,000 MOW, Assistant Superintendent For Administration (8 zce INDEX DESCRIPTION ° °I§ ) ) 2100 FICA - Em a ) §° 2 § °\\ 7$ 88 f$ 0 en 7 Af § VI 0 §§ ~ • \ $ k 1 0 oI \�f \2f f�f ga0 « (1) < E • \\ § § 8 \§ $§ \k� 8 8 f§ o 8 en CO JO 4kco } k li b r 00 Educational Testing / Remediation wO1 re00i co 12 a cn h tit 2' q 0 Lit W . m A 0 OS tz01 oV i Q Z DESCRIPTION o M O O 0 O n 0 8° O 0 8 n0 8 8 8 () CD 0 8 c) O O 0 0 N v 00 (0 0 0 (0 O O ((00 c 0 S p O M woo N(0(00 O 0 N 0 - Q m N i m c0 m S n en X 0 ON O O (n 0 (0 8 8 (0 v 8 8 (o 0 N T 8 N S 2 F F 8 ,11 8 11, 0 O M sr- 0 N 80N 0 os O N a i N (09 (0 N (0 c M m h O (co O 00 (0 00 M. D M 08 7 (0 M 8 Q M 8 (0 u r N p) 0 0 W y E ?: w c2 E1 cc c(5 > 8 O41W y 0=C ao r U' M M co co 0 0 O 00610 CaiM 0 8 0 0 00 0 N O (0 N (0 00 0 CO fV O OIO • O 0 0 N 0 0 (+1 8 8 8 M 0 Y (0 6 OI co N co N V 0 Educational Testing Sub -Total Superintendent's Recommendatlon(s): Vocational Education (82) 0 w O w N 6 Ere c Z TI• st w � o) F a W ct OO1 2 0 V WCC 2 a w C• a0i w • °0i z• ' 2 0 U z W a o DESCRIPTION O O O O O O OiU) O o,ao O O !M 0 0 n G 1- O 8 O0) CO O) t0 c7 t0 in U LL 8 N C) O N N 8 t00 N 0) d z w m 2 N N N 4) N n 4 08 h CO 0 N N N � n N b co g wU co 2 • c_ a N O 1 2 0 0 0 co 0 O 0 0 O 0) 0 N 0 8 O O 0 O 8 N O 8 8 N N f7 O 0 04) M 00 )+) 0� 0 h 0 0 0 0 0 w N H N 0 O 00 010) 0'7 4- o co O 43 co 8 Y 8 n .07 OS 4) as i c 0 O 0 o 0u�) n 8 C 8 v 0 010 O 0 O 11) M 0 M 0 0 0 O 03 Pupil Personnel Services/Special Education DESCRIPTION olo O O O O 1 o 0 0 0 0 C 0 'o h 0 0 O O O O O 0 N 0 0 N 0 0 0 O a 8 CO N O 8 N O U 8 8 O N 0 0 00 N 8 a O N n 8 O O 8 N 0 8 0 O 8 N 01 N 8 0- 8 0 02 CO 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 vi v N h O 8 0 O O O I (Conf. & Conventions) Equipment - Office ctional Materials - PT & OT Materials c O m O O O co m O 8 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0101010 o olol O 00 O O O O 00 0 0 08 Oo0.LL 0, 8 T N 0 N 8 8 080. 8 N 0 0 O 0 of N O O 0 010 O 0 8 (0 (0 m co si i A m L .15 N c O —VI 0 N 0 h CO (0 0 Y 0 0 V 00 0o co 7 8 N 8 8 07 A C7 1NA 3 A 0 N 3 H h N o oiojolo 0 ,0_ 0 O n 0 8 0 0 n O O 0 0 O 0 o N f '() 0 0 OI m (0 8 0 N 0 0 • 88 40 O N o 8 (V 8 8 8 0,0 0 N N 0 0 N 10) Y is Q CO n� 5 0 W ?� C9 n O a m J t• ¢ OI Ito 0' 0 ¢ INDEX DESCRIPTION O 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 N n O c 0 0 CO mwa co TO 8 00 0 O N 0 0 N 0 0 t7 O 0 tV O 4 c m- 0 01 1••• O M 03 �'.N �q 0 0 0 0 0 O t+1 0 0 O c t0 C O_ 2 To O th l0 OII TOTAL DEPARTMENT O O O .. 0 N 0a a c E� E u e ar N O ti N Eo E Superintendents Recommendation(s): Guidance Services El ON WQ N LLJ W c) a. U W Z O Wo) ca CA 444 co co W ce a Y f 0 V W 00) 4Lai 0 fx o Z Y a 0 2 H co r. w?� 0 W m Y <0? U28 ` Y DESCRIPTION 8 tri t0 op 0 8 0 0,0 0I0.0,0 tG 0 N 0 N 000 0 O VI O 0 N Y N O 8888 LO N ^ N (0 0 0 V N 1-1- °888 N ^ 1, O 00 1N N 8 a� 0 M0 O 0 t9 a1 8 O to .2 3 8 N 0 N N 0 8 O N C o3 0 0 O 00 h 8 M 8 03 0 88 � M 0 0 a co u. • to 0 O O fV 8 N 0N0 N a N 01 a tN 0 m A) O .i 3 1) M Ol m E co co 0 3 • 0( •C A t) co • • o c o� (0 E E 0 E. „- 8 a Ia .ram' m O = U co TOTAL DEPARTMENT cc w O W) < LLJ W � cc U W = O W tg F- a cn N W cca°Di 0 0 00 0) W Z • .• 42 Z W 0 • Oco A1 o m < O) U DEPT. REC. Media Services DESCRIPTION 0 O 8 O 8 O 8 • N ▪ Tei 0 O 8 O n , en 0 0 cco O 0 O (0- 0 0 0 0 )O 8 O O co 0 O 0 O7 a 8 O O 8 O st a W 0000 O 0S 0 N C) 10 CO O O en a co Q M CO O O O O 0 0 0 8 O 0 0 N Q 0 0 M O O 0 0 n W W W 3 O m N 0080 c O O o 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 M r O 8 0 8 O 4) O Q N g 01 W N O 7 0 8 m J 0 N N CO 0 0 N N CO 000 000 o oo ui N N 0 0 0 0 8 0 O M Q 00 0 1- 03 1n O A .0 J )) Y m O N 6 C N. CO J U. 0 N CV el 0 0 0 O N O 0 0 co 0 0 m 00000 8 m 8 M m • 8 m O i0'0 I8 0 g 19 0 0 0 co- 8°0 o I o 818 O CO - Mr 8 O 0 O c) CO O Cr) M el1N 0 0To- N f0 8 8 8 co 8 CO a0 M 8 M N) O CO a TOTAL DEPARTMENT 0 0 0. en V 1— INDEX DESCRIPTION 000000010 O 0 0 o N 0 0 O 0 0 00 O 00 O O 0 u) 000 I O O 0 0 0 O N • 000 0 O If- • u07 0 C) O 1- 0 O Oo000 g)0-0 N 000 00 N 0) co O Ul 0 00 O . N CO O 0 0 O co N 0O 0 v 0 a v 0 M N 00 O u) N 0 0 00 c0O N 0 0 0 0 u0) I u0) 0 u) 0 O 000 0 0 O N 0 0 0 0 0000 o)n)n0 N N N O 0 O 0 u) 0 O 0CN O c'')O 0 VI cc) h O u" CO O u, 0 0 00 0 O a) Cc `a f0asw .8u) �tS y =� coo N c.0 COO OOCD u) 0 Lto N 0 4- N 0 0 0 00 0 u) N N O 0 r N O O O O 000 0) �Op 7 y a w co > t9 0 N O 0 0 °-) E d OU ar5 y N tn g) H L 0> H o (02 O N CO0 0 in LC) OCO CO 0000 0 0 0 0 co O 0 0 N 0 0 N 000 00 0 N N 00 0 N 0 N 000 0 0 N N O et )0 0 CO Co C7 el N 00 0 U) 0 0 YO) 0 N O 0 O N 0 N 010•0000 n O O oi ui 00 O O O 00 00 O 0 0 00 0 O O Tr V C1-uO)4N0 CO O 0 Cr 0 O 0 0 0 0 CO 0'N O e- LC) N N co 00) 0 O co V 0 0 00 0 0 O) u) 0 0 of 0 0 m0 • 0i 0 0 0 0 0 O O O u) O O olo' 0 ui 00 O y co 0 IN a 0) O. C o: a) C fa _ o _ O crTo E , y a .0 U Vaa OmO OyIa O u a.0 y y� .'WO0O� CO mN�0001�y°��0ni cwoccFO E _O~€0 OclQa8ywn'N ..ally nmlaU-HU201=�0> 0)C0u)CO oMI N :0) 0 co C') u) 00) CI) 00 CV CO CD O N .-N u)O c000000 co a3) z cs) a) c0 O co olo O N 0 0 O N 0 0 0 010 0 010 O 0110 O 01 0 ON W zU UW 2- WS N CO a' 3. a WS 2' i� 0 U uJ cc a� W Wo C) rz Z 0 U Z Facilities & Operations O O O o0,800 m O O0 co O 00 co 8 O0,o CO 0 O 0 0 0 0 (0 O N cola) co 8 N 0 0 8 oa 8 00 0 8 O 7 G N O 8 88ci 0 0 m n O O 0 O N �(0 N N N N N 0 N N 0 000104o, 00 0 I ri o) 00 0 co 0( m C a 3 a a N U s CO rr O O 0 0 se R C y• ._.g 0 • o UU Bea Na)c n8i COICO O O O 8 O 8 0 N co N W 0 O) (. N O 0a N C a. m 3 U O O 0 O N 0 O 010 0 ol0'10 0 ole co 00 O 0 0 O CO CD N O a 0 0 0 OI 0 0 OIO O O 01 O 0 (O 0 O (O 0 00 O co - 8 (0 0 O (0 O O (O(O 0 (0 0088 (0(0(O O n O o0 ((( 0p (n N a) a (0 v O N N Oa 0 N V m N N (9 03 O 08800,000 000 0 (n n 0 N N U 1 a NE IE E�adco ,„_� Y g1>>a o.gaiN,'6m(a3va8a)2JcV2nfcn0y _ W3Q Ci__Its/illLI`i0aLI(ill U qca)oa)aNNNaa.6 0 2' 222'2'22'2'22LL (D — (47(n (O<(0 a)PO O N N N N N N N N N N N N el (7 r) M I P) (7 C') P) O) (e) P) e) • N Il7 v ✓ 8 U) N 8 (N N O NN 0 8 N N rn 8 Q Y O n 8 M ca 0 N 0 N 8 co Ol88 NIo a) a LL N (n 0 O 0 Y N N 10t0l000l 000 (OO 0 (00 LL U. N N N O 0 N co O pO O N (000 ON 00 4, co - WI 0) 00 1• O 8 • 0O I((pp • ON�In (44) 0) ((1) r N CD 0 V N 60 (n N 0 0 O 0 0 0a OI 0 o0I0 01. 0 oio0 0 0l 0 O 0 0!01 N00 Nre, 0 (l N. P)(0(0 N ( 1(000 a 0010100 1-) -1)Eln ) 1� k Li 2 C2 t� 0 k� E 0 §� 2� 0 ■ j� - 0 « INDEX DESCRIPTION /E /EE o 03 § } � 4, � 2 kkaaa7 cccccc 00 0 ) k § / 2 § 2 ns Equip -New § 01 TOTAL DEPARTMENT Superintendent's Recommendatton(s 0 School Board re O y w Q ul w C4 w i° w w CA a) I — a M W O 2 0 wO) X O 01 0. w 0 C7 od w Zo) .- 0 U z c0 wr. ?� O1 m111 INDEX DESCRIPTION 701000 School Board N 0 co c+) co co N 0 cri O co Board Member 0 O rn CO T 0 0 0 0 Ia' O 00 O CO o 0) 0) 0 M 0 M 0 0 of 0 A 0 0 0 v) u) 0) n n 0 O 0 O 0 0 e- 0 O O 0 0 0 .- O 0 0 c) N N 0) n O 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 N co 0) L N E i O m 8 co ae 0)) O co 0) N 0) N O O f0 0 O t0 0 0 w i School Board Activities 01 TOTAL DEPARTMENT Superintendent's Recommendation(s): Superintendent (71 DESCRIPTION O0 00 00 0 0,0 N N 0 0 csi N 0 O^ O N f0 0 N (Q 0 n N 0 0 cri Tr. n- O 00 O 8 1' O 0 O 0 0 to N O O M0100 CM 0 O N CD U c 0•`c C 4 C..) CU co c .0 c 4) �0 _ O C N N CD C 4) g 0> 7 to .— N C .CJ O c 0 2 q Q 0 > coo 1- 6 r -ra o co in in z 0 O CO 0 y > O ON4) Ira 1 to L 0 O N °O c C Uy 0 8 O 8 0 a) v u. .0 0 co c 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 O 0 0 n in 0 O - LLY .- 0 1C) 1. 0 'OC) ._ 00 0 A O 0 M 0 O 8 O 1- 0 N N N co co Itl 0 0) CO CD 0 010 0 0 00 0- 0 0 0 110 O O 0 0 O 0 1C) 1C) 0 0 0 0 O 08 0 O 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 ,co 0 0 8 csi O 0 CO Nn 1)') 0 � OE (D ..4r. LO cci Tr"OM�'T rn N 0 cc r 10 I CO 0N00IT- CO M M M N �M (0 CD I(D N TOTAL DEPARTMENT Superintendent's Recommendation(s): Budget & Data Management (72 INDEX DESCRIPTION 0 0 0 a N 0 c') co �m 0 O 8 O 8 m M N 4) 5 01 2 CO co 0, nS 0 0 0 O O 8 CO co 0 0 0 O 0 0 c() N 11) N N m- cc N W w LL 8 0 07 ('4 03 O> Ln 0 co ()) o M N 0 07 c'f 8 N N O S n 0 8 0 CO N 0 N O a C 1 a 0 0 N o 00) O O N O 00 0 00 CO0) o -o ^! °' Ln N 8 N 0 m N e O 8 H 8 O K) 0 N 8 `° 0 1- 0 < CO- o 8� Y CV 03 W08 0 iq N Ce CO fi S N N 1 U8 co O 8 0 00) N 08 O O N CO n 0 07 0 0) N 8 O CO N 0 CO 1 N 1. 2 8 0 N N 10 N 8 N H N N o o N 0 N 8 8 8 cca a 5504 Travel 8 8 8 O N CO co co m 0 0 o of 0 O O 0 0 0 CO. O (m'7 CO0 0 0110 O COad O 8 0 0 00 O 00 m 8 O 0 O Ln CO C E 4) ? z w a'i c E Eww N w o O 0 0 CO CO WmW N 0 r 8) 8 z EEE 5 cr w w w Ng 0t. c c N 0I03 0 0 N. m N n 8 N N N n a N n O 0 m olo 0 0l n 0 0 any Ln 0 0 to H 0) co N co co N O 8 o§ N h O 3 0 0 a O 0 8 0 O Y INCOMING REQ. co C Staff Devel ;e 0)02 0)Of INDEX DESCRIPTION oo 0 r- o810 0 O 08 O O 8 8 cc- 88 88 8 m N 0 N 8 N N 8 8 88 M O O a 8 m o 0) 8 8 O O U 0) 8 0; l) co_ co O O 0 8 4) O O 0 O M 08 O 0 N 4 0 O M 1199 Part-time 8 8 8 8 N 8000)0 0 toN co I- CO 88§CO 08 0 N M t09 ,f) CD N 2100 FICA - E N N 0 03 0 N 0 0 0 N 0 400 MN — w O O 0 NO CD NY) 7 4 a TOTAL DEPARTMENT Superintendent's Recommendation(s): DESCRIPTION O O O O co n N 8 U 2100 FICA - E 8 v cc 8 U O O cn N f O O 8 8 O CO as�a a O 03 03 A 8 8 U U 6 a 0 0 8 O co m O O O O O c 2 8 m N 8 N 8 co 8 m N O O O 8 m O 8 (c N 2 : d 0 0 C 03aas v N Y N v 2 8 U d w 5 L 8 N 8 0 O 8 0 O O 0 O TOTAL DEPARTMENT Summer School INCREASE OR SUPT. REC. INCOMING REQ. F- W 0 (DECREASE) Q W U 4C INDEX DESCRIPTION COT0) CDC41<OT C[i 0 O co 0 0 O O co O O4 COO N COT 0 VD O N 10 CO 0 0 O 00 C O) CO Oop C4 C CD 0 O CA 7m 8 8 CA m A N b O'41 eO;O 0 N CD CC) 0) O'7 OO ;V CO N CO 8 8 8 N 0) NCppO T N CO CO N CO 2- 0 O 1 0 01 n O en a. (0 CCOO CO O CO N 0 CV 8 co - 8 CO 0 0) CO 0 u1 Co co (0 Y W k 0 8 co N 8 N 0 N 8 0 CV O 0 Co co CO 0 CO co N O 0 N O O 5 'C O E 00 0 0 O. N 8 N 8 O 8 W 88 N a 0 0 N CO CO 1) 00 0 N N N T 0 8 CD N41 00 N N 0 Ni 8 CO N T N CO O 0 01.0 0 ' 0 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 0 42. O 0 CV 0 of n O N r- 8 0 C1 n 0 oT 0 O N M .130 I.1 o 41 ,7O 0 U cl s Fy C ^;8 T N :3 a c U 000 CD 00 O O O O 8 0 Csi 0 8 0 M CA 0 N 0 O N O N O O co Q O8 T N 1 } O 0 8 0 en- 0 0 0 O 0 COO 8 N fM 8 O N 0 0 N O 0 0 o.o v1'ol 001.',OI 0) u]IT 01 N z' 00 0 V N CC1;0 N,0 CDI 0 cr);O 0 NIO CD CD O O CO01101 41 41 N1 24 T, N o o 1 00 0 4 A8 �41: A 8 0 O -0 0 N 8 0 N 'SIN O 7 5 Adult and Continuing Education (90) CCU. 0000 00 00 00 000 00 000 CD CD a O h 6 w h W • a z U U W Z O ✓ w a W W a o) F- a U) U.1 0 0 0 0 O O 0 N 0 O 0 0 Q Ot O O Q 0 co 0 0 0 0 O O O Ol 0 0 0 g aD O <O $ 0 r) w s 0 0 0 CD N r) O N O N O N ro O v^ O o) of 0 . .4o c N. 0 V N W (C ui i 0 U Lj3: 0000p 00 0u) 00 0i.O $0 00 0r) W 0 0 0 0 O N 8 o Oco O O O CD OtD� $aD O O< N N O iO O N C O co Y^ M a1 O- . N N N— i0,� a 0 Of US Id a W 0 W o o g g g �S 00 0m 0. om Cl oy pp pp 0 8 Ce Oai O O V (O N e) O N 0 ([) O N O O <0 Y ^ O Of CO o .- Y coy! cV o .- o,� v N of ro ui Z i 0 U Z O O O N O O O P O O) 0 O O co W aD 8 pp o 8 0 8 0 0 $en o0E oro Oro$ 0co 0 1. O O Y co N P) O N N O N O ro O Y O t7 m' co- N O r O el M ( Y 0 Oi co- — N CI J m m M O O CO N m M O 0W O l�I P.N 0 co N) ro co el �j ch f N C .- .- c0 cV o .- (0 N N N 0 INDEX DESCRIPTION 0 0 a e U 1 ccN O o c a tq § a a • q • IS g co.E > U U 0 • U ? U . U 3 U 0 o • o i� • o y V W • a g ea a ▪ CO a y a c7ya 0 m E r E i E s a E 5 E i E IL, la 0 `0 — . q W o d W 8 W o a� W e o W o` W O W • 0 $_ a o N Q to Q p� Q� ro Q co � o� Q oo) O N a: 5 Ci F- Cu. N F- u. T F- UL o 1- LL Q OO) F- 4. 0 F- W O) H LL p 0 N O 8O N O O N O N O 0 N O N 0 N N �N .-N f7 ,-N /-N/') 1-N TOTAL DEPARTMENT N 'e C 9 o C A d e m E u o m re • N c a c 00 m c � c Z-c O (0 • t g AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998 RESOLUTION 032498-10 CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Certification Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Horton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Executive Session AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998 RESOLUTION 032498-11 OF CONGRATULATIONS TO WILLIAM BYRD HIGH SCHOOL GIRLS BASKETBALL TEAM FOR WINNING GROUP AA STATE BASKETBALL CHAMPIONSHIP WHEREAS, team sports are an important part of the curriculum at schools in Roanoke County, teaching cooperation, sportsmanship and athletic skill; and WHEREAS, the William Byrd High School Girls Basketball Team won the Group AA state basketball championship this year, overcoming a 10-point deficit to beat Turner Ashby by 57-54; and WHEREAS, Brandy Allen, who scored 30 points during the championship game, was named AA Player of the Year in Virginia, First Team All State, First Team All Region, First Team All District, and District and Region Player of the Year; and Andrea Gay was named to the First Team All District; and WHEREAS, the William Byrd High School Girls Basketball Team 's record for the season was 29 wins and one loss; and WHEREAS, Coach Richard Thrasher was named AA Coach of the Year for the State of Virginia. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, does hereby extend its sincere congratulations to the members of the William Byrd High School Girls Basketball Team: Kara Norcross, Dawn Chewning, Erin Caldwell, Whitney Yates, Sarah Moore, Lara Nester, Stephanie Parnell, Andrea Gay, Brandy Allen, Brennan Sigel, Nicole Bailey, Courtney Ross, J. J. McKinney, and Jackie 1 Killen; Managers, Glenn Rife, Justin Mitchell and Kellen Williams; and Coaches, Richard Thrasher, Debbie Williams -Arthur, Robin Hungate, Garry Saunders, and Tammy Newcomb, for their athletic ability, their team spirit, and their commitment to each other; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors extends its best wishes to the the team, the coaches, and the school in their future endeavors. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: 9It n De Brenda J. Ho put y Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Dr. Deanna Gordon, School Superintendent Resolutions of Congratulations File 2 te-/ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998 RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS TO WILLIAM BYRD HIGH SCHOOL GIRLS BASKETBALL TEAM FOR WINNING GROUP AA STATE BASKETBALL CHAMPIONSHIP WHEREAS, team sports are an important part of the curriculum at schools in Roanoke County, teaching cooperation, sportsmanship and athletic skill; and WHEREAS, the William Byrd High School Girls Basketball Team won the Group AA state basketball championship this year, overcoming a 10-point deficit to beat Turner Ashby by 57-54; and WHEREAS, Brandy Allen, who scored 30 points during the championship game, was named AA Player of the Year in Virginia, First Team All State, First Team All Region, First Team All District, and District and Region Player of the Year; and Andrea Gay was named to the First Team All District; and WHEREAS, the William Byrd High School Girls Basketball Team 's record for the season was 29 wins and one loss; and WHEREAS, Coach Richard Thrasher was named AA Coach of the Year for the State of Virginia. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, does hereby extend its sincere congratulations to the members of the William Byrd High School Girls Basketball Team: Kara Norcross, Dawn Chewning, Erin Caldwell, Whitney Yates, Sarah Moore, Lara Nester, Stephanie Parnell, Andrea Gay, Brandy Allen, Brennan Sigel, Nicole Bailey, Courtney Ross, J. J. McKinney, and Jackie 1 Killen; Managers, Glenn Rife, Justin Mitchell and Kellen Williams; and Coaches, Richard Thrasher, Debbie Williams -Arthur, Robin Hungate, Garry Saunders, and Tammy Newcomb, for their athletic ability, their team spirit, and their commitment to each other; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors extends its best wishes to the the team, the coaches, and the school in their future endeavors. 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER S AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 24,1998 AGENDA ITEM: Budget Work Session on the Upcoming Annual Budget for FY 1998-99. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This time has been set aside for a budget work session to meet with representatives of the Volunteer Fire Chiefs Board and the Volunteer Rescue Chiefs Board. A presentation highlighting the FY98-99 funding requests will be made. Chief Rick Burch will lead the presentation. Respectfully submitted, Brent Robertson Budget Manager Approved by, / Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved () Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied () Harrison — Received () Johnson Referred () McNamara To () Minnix Nickens ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER S -'2 - AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 24, 1998 AGENDA ITEM: Budget Presentations on the Upcoming Annual Budget for FY 1998-99. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This time has been set aside for presentations to allow social service, human service, tourism and cultural agencies the opportunity to orally submit funding requests to the Board of Supervisors for inclusion in the FY 1998-99 budget. This work session format will allow a more focused presentation that will benefit the Board members and the requesting agencies. Please find enclosed an updated listing of organizational requests that include prior years' actual payments, FY97-98 approved budget, and the organizations' funding request for FY98-99 for your review during the presentations. These schedules can be inserted into your work session notebook (along with an updated table of contents). The "proposed" funding column has not been completed. The County Administrator will make recommendations for funding and present them to the Board as part of the FY1998-99 proposed budget that is planned for submittal in April. The written requests and accompanying literature submitted by each organization has been placed in the Clerk to the Board's office for review. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, Brent Robertson Budget Manager Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved () Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied () Harrison Received () Johnson Referred () McNamara To O Minnix Nickens Table of Contents • • 1. Calendar 1-1 2. Summaries 3. Expenditures Mid Year Expenditure Report (as of 12/31/97) 3-1 Contributions to Local Service Agencies FY 1998-99 3-5 4. Revenues Discussion of FY 97-98 and FY 98-99 Revenues 4-1 Mid Year Revenue Report (as of 12/31/97) 4-2 FY 98-99 Preliminary Revenue Projection 4-3 FY 97-98 Amended v. FY 98-99 Proposed 4-4 Personal Property Revenue Breakdown 4-5 5. Funded Capital 6. Additional Funding Requests (Addbacks) Capital Maintenance Requests 6-1 Public Safety Team Requests 6-3 Community Service Budget Team Requests 6-6 Human Service Budget Team Requests 6-9 Internal Services/Operations Budget Team Requests 6-12 Judicial/State Services Budget Team Requests 6-15 7. Personnel 8. School Budget 9. CIP CIP Committee Prioritization of Projects 9-1 FY 1999-2003 Summary of Departmental CIP Requests 9-4 CIP Draft Document (to be distributed on 3/11/98) 10. Debt Service 11. Vehicle Replacement Ask Vehicle Inventory Listing 11-1 Vehicles Available for Replacement 11-2 M:\finance\budget\workses\toc.wpd March 19, 1998 County of Roanoke Board of Supervisors Contributions to Local Service Agencies FY 1998-99 Requests • 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1998-99 Actual Actual Budget Request Approved Human Service Agencies Adult Care Center of the Roanoke Valley $5,000 $7,000 $10,000 $12,480 Alzheimer's Association 0 0 0 2,500 Association for Retarded Citizens (ARC) 10,000 10,000 10,000 15,000 Bethany Hall 500 500 500 4,000 Big Brothers and Big Sisters of Roanoke Valley 0 2,500 2,500 3,000 Blue Ridge Regional Education and Training Council 3,466 Bradley Free Clinic 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 Child Abuse Prevention Council of Roanoke Valley 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 Child Health Investment Partnership (CHIP) 16,660 16,660 16,660 21,600 Conflict Resolution Center, Inc. 0 0 0 3,950 Council of Community Services -Info and Referral Center 3,000 3,000 3,000 7,470 Court Appointed Special Advocate (CASA) 1,053 2,000 2,000 5,000 Family Service of the Roanoke Valley 3,000 4,000 4,000 5,000 Fifth District Employment & Training Consortium 3,000 3,500 3,500 11,730 Smith Mountain Lake 4H Camp 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,600 Goodwill Industries Tinker Mountain 5,000 5,000 5,000 11,200 Habitat for Humanity 0 0 0 22,000 League of Older Americans (LOA) 12,500 13,750 13,750 22,688 Literacy Volunteer Program 0 1,000 1,000 1,000 National Multiple Sclerosis Society 0 0 0 1,000 Roanoke Area Ministries 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,500 Roanoke Valley Drug and Alcohol Abuse Council 0 1,000 1,000 2,000 fitoanoke Valley Speech & Hearing Center 500 1,000 1,000 1,000 alem/Roanoke County Community Food Pantry 0 0 0 8,000 The Salvation Army 2,000 2,000 2,000 3,500 TRUST 5,500 5,500 5,500 6,000 Subtotal Human Service Agencies $82,213 $92,910 $95,910 $188,684 $0 Health and Social Service Agencies Blue Ridge Community Services $79,332 $79,332 $79,332 $108,204 TAP 25,000 30,000 30,000 35,101 TAP -Transitional Living Center 15,000 17,500 17,500 22,017 Subtotal Health and Social Service Agencies $119,332 $126,832 $126,832 $165,322 $0 Cultural Enrichment and Tourism Agencies Alonzo Stagg Bowl $2,500 $2,500 $2,500 $2,500 Art Museum of Western Virginia 2,000 2,000 2,000 6,100 Arts Council of the Blue Ridge 3,000 3,000 3,000 4,000 Center in the Square: Operating 50,000 50,000 50,000 60,000 Capital 0 0 0 12,000 Explore (The River Foundation) 150,000 160,000 160,000 225,000 Julian Stanley Wise Museum(25,000/yr. for 3 yrs.) 0 12,500 25,000 35,000 League of Women Voters 275 300 0 0 Mill Mountain Theatre 8,500 8,500 8,500 12,200 Mill Mountain Zoo: Operating 6,000 8,000 8,000 10,000 Capital 10,000 10,000 10,000 22,000 Sister City Pavilion 10,000 0 0 0 Ms. Virginia Senior Citizen Pageant 100 100 100 0 IIIKiss Virginia Pageant 500 500 500 500 ational D-Day Memorial Foundation($25,000/year for 10 years) 0 10,000 10,000 230,000 Opera Roanoke 0 0 0 800 OUTLOOK Downtown Roanoke 0 1,000 1,000 0 Roanoke Symphony 7,500 7,500 7,500 10,000 3-5 County of Roanoke Board of Supervisors Contributions to Local Service Agencies FY 1998-99 Requests 0 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1998-99 Actual Actual Budget Request Approved Cultural Enrichment and Tourism Agencies (continued) Roanoke Valley Greenways Coordinator 0 21,600 10,800 11,100 Roanoke Valley History Museum 6,350 7,500 7,500 7,800 Salem Museum / Salem Historical Society 0 0 0 0 Science Museum: Operating 25,000 25,000 25,000 72,000 Capital 20,000 20,000 20,000 80,000 Transportation Museum: Operating 10,000 10,000 10,000 15,000 Capital 0 2,000 2,000 10,000 VA Western Community College Scholarship Fund 5,274 5,339 5,338 5,360 Handicapped Access 0 0 0 59,892 Student Act.Ctr - Construction 13,527 13,527 0 0 Site Development / Improvements 66,379 0 22,870 31,033 Vinton Dogwood Festival 500 500 500 1,000 Western Virginia Land Trust Subtotal Cultural Enrichment and Tourism Agencies Dues and Per Capita Allocations Blue Ridge Soil and Conservation District Convention and Visitors Bureau - Operating Economic Development Partnership Fifth Planning District Commission National Association of Counties 0 0 0 25,000 $397,405 $381,366 $392,108 $948,285 $0 $1,000 $1,250 $1,250 $1,500 107,500 107,500 107,500 165,000 107,500 107,500 107,500 112,185 21,900 29,160 29,654 29,654 1,557 1,557 1,557 1,557 41)National Civic League Roanoke Regional Chamber of Commerce Salem/Roanoke County Chamber of Commerce Roanoke Valley Sister Cities Tour Dupont Vinton Chamber of Commerce 200 200 200 200 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 1,000 0 3,000 3,000 5,000 7,500 0 0 100 100 100 500 Virginia Amateur Sports Virginia Association of Counties Virginia Institute of Government Virginia Municipal League Subtotal Dues and Per Capita Allocations 35,000 35,000 35,000 40,000 13,855 13,855 13,940 13,940 5,000 0 0 0 15,245 16,006 16,806 16,806 $323,357 $328,128 $325,007 $392,842 $0 Grand Total All BOS Contributions $922,307 $929,236 $939,857 $1,695,133 $0 • 3-6 40000 16,00 aiOo° 0 614-14, 42-nktdito-h e--#7P &000 bbetc.& die„,44,:-/-4, 11,2,60 the..1 -do,u,ca,,„,,e,./A,Litj. a/a444,a7_ it4} 112,4 aza, 5'Aoiij i( (3)v zt, Q-02,,, c:k ilittabA:t -7bSr 12-4° CLOLLif _j.„ oco apiLt.N4u4, ekt,,LL, (7470 ci lu.4 100°• 16,- ,S-L619/k4t )08,16 ,L) PIU nALIL . OAti . 0 d,50L/Li i(P WA- 011A cLj L5 g °I` ilalebl Eith\ flLvLii- 8a4),7 el e kJ'1a,(,t 62L4-e-tJ 00 0 ( 0 1000 3`i So MOO 90° .35°°`) d5000 3000 6000 goo° ceuteA14)Ut Arnitc mo-tritz Halt th\-0\ivim Lwai'kevk, Zo-nrA):% khusofv.h '311\4j11 k 11\x't,t~k cg MghszAm, o-0 111a41 &lk TLt' i Eic.a0.40 UtkPA, jict'cL"4- 0Adizzi,m-- \-14--e- OUP O'id-tk36-9,- 141,4.11 e P.) ttow..4-- (4 - • ci2Ju24c,, 4s)s 61,44t&, // (14 (i/hiAtt,, 2 s-a County of Roanoke Board of Supervisors Contributions to Local Service Agencies FY 1998-99 Requests Human Service Agencies Adult Care Center of the Roanoke Valley Alzheimer's Associationoi p� Association for Retarded Citizens (ARC) h 1))tbA Bethany Hall i?nah Q. 1<r MA er Big Brothers and Big Sisters of Roanoke Valley Blue Ridge Regional Education and Training Council nAA he4J 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1998-99 Actual Actual Budget Request Approved $5,000 $7,000 $10,000 $12,480 0 0 0 2,500 10,000 10,000 10,000 15,000 500 500 500 0 2,500 2,500 4,000 3,000 3,466 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 Child Abuse Prevention Council of Roanoke Valley , f . ,64,A,ek,., 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 5° Child Health Investment Partnership (CHIP) /14 Z,R, 14., 16,660 16,660 16,660 21,600 onflict Resolution Center, Inc. ()I ay-1 A, r 0 0 0 3,950 Council of Community Services -Info and Referral Centers, , R. u;�5jLtin.3,000 3,000 3,000 7,470 Court Appointed Special Advocate (CASA) 1,053 2,000 2,000 5,000 Family Service of the Roanoke Valley .� h Fifth District Employment & Training Consortium Smith Mountain Lake 4H Camp Goodwill Industries Tinker Mountain j er f nc boa's Habitat for Humanity, cmoe 3,000 3,000 4,000 3,500 4,000 3,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 5,000 0 5,000 0 5,000 5,000 11,730 2,600 11,200 0 22,000 League of Older Americans (LOA) �',sq��y; Il�an+5 12,500 13,750 13,750 22,688 0 1,000 1,000/ Literacy Volunteer Program National Multiple Sclerosis Society 0 Weil ilia') t-<-' �;o t1anoke Valley Drug and Alcohol Abus" Council'ph ; e ) anoke Valley Speech & Hearing Center 'Dr, n 4 alem/Roanoke County Community Food Pantry ez,,t4 fl i -y w 0 oanoke Area Ministries he Salvation Army TRUST /C ;& wk vrS Subtotal Human Service Agencies Health and Social Service Agencies `1,k Blue Ridge Community Services S� 'a ,eE3e , b TAP P tie ►A 8r" TAP -Transitional Living Center 2,000 0 500 2,000 5,500 1,000 0 2,000 1,000 1,000 0 2,000 5,500 0 2,000 1,000 1,000 0 2,000 5,500 1,000 2,500 2,000 1,000 8,000 3,500 6,000 $82,213 $92,910 $95,910 $188,684 $79,332 $79,332 $79,332 $108,204 25,000 30,000 30,000 35,101 15,000 17,500 17,500 22,017 Subtotal Health and Social Service Agencies $119,332 $126,832 $126,832 $165,322 Cultural Enrichment and Tourism Agencies Alonzo Stagg Bowl Art Museum of Western Virginia Ja „ Arts Council of the Blue Ridge Center in the Square: Operating Capital 44) Explore (The River Foundation) Qjt, Julian Stanley Wise Museum(25,000 r. for 3 yrs.) League of Women Voters L t s't or IDA Ake, IC $2,500 $2,500 $2,500 $2,500 2,000 3,000 2,000 2,000 3,000 3,000 6,100 4,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 60,000 0 0 0 12,000 $0 $0 Mill Mountain Theatre j o n h 1,, EyLciA Mill Mountain Zoo: Operating Capital Sister City Pavilion Ms. Virginia Senior Citizen Pageant Miss Virginia Pageant vr6 ANational D-Day Memorial Foundation($25,000/year for 10 years) Opera Roanoke OUTLOOK Downtown Roanoke Roanoke Symphony 150,000 160,000 160,000 225,000 0 12,500 25,000 35,000 275 300 0 0 8,500 8,500 8,500 12,200 6,000 8,000 8,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 22,000 10,000 100 500 44 S. 0 0 0 0 100 500 0 100 500 0 0 500 10,000 0 1,000 10,000 0 1,000 230,000 800 0 7,500 7,500 7,500 10,000 50, ©©a 3-5 County of Roanoke Board of Supervisors Contributions to Local Service Agencies FY 1998-99 Requests 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1998-99 Actual Actual Budget Request Approved Cultural Enrichment and Tourism Agencies (continued) Roanoke Valley Greenways Coordinator 466 0 21,600 10,800 11,100 5 Roanoke Valley History Museum ) r. Kr d sr,q,n 6,350 7,500 7,500 7,800 Salem Museum / Salem Historical Socie 0 0 0 0 Science Museum: Operating in5� 25,000 25,000 25,000 72,000 Capital 20,000 20,000 20,000 80,000 Transportation Museum: Operating 10,000 10,000 10,000 15,000 Capital 0 2,000 2,000 10,000 VA Western Community College Scholarship Fund 5,274 5,339 5,338 5,360 Handicapped Access 0 0 0 59,892 Student Act.Ctr - Construction 13,527 13,527 0 0 Site Development/ Improvements 66,379 0 22,870 31,033 Vinton Dogwood Festival 500 500 500 1,000 Western Virginia Land Trust ubfotal Cultural Enrichment and To ism Agencies Dues and Per Capita Allocations Blue Ridge Soil and Conservation District lei 0 0 0 25,000 $397,405 $381,366 $392,108 $948,285 $0 $1,000 $1,250 $1,250 $1,500 Convention and Visitors Bureau - Operating 107,500 107,500 107,500 165,000 Economic Development Partnership 107,500 107,500 107,500 112,185 Fifth Planning District Commission 21,900 29,160 29,654 29,654 National Association of Counties 1,557 1,557 1,557 1,557 National Civic League 200 200 200 200 Roanoke Regional Chamber of Commerce 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 Salem/Roanoke County Chamber of Commerce 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 Roanoke Valley Sister Cities 1,000 0 3,000 3,000 Tour Dupont Vinton Chamber of Commerce Virginia Amateur Sports 4 SSrc e-( 5,000 7,500 0 0 100 100 100 500 35,000 35,000 35,000 40,000 Virginia Association of Counties 13,855 13,855 13,940 13,940 Virginia Institute of Government 5,000 0 0 0 Virginia Municipal League Subtotal Dues and Per Capita Allocations Grand Total All BOS Contributions 15,245 16,006 16,806 16,806 $323,357 $328,128 $325,007 $392,842 $0 $922,307 $929,236 $939,857 $1,695,133 $0 3-6 BUDGET REQUESTS FOR HUMAN SERVICES, SOCIAL, CULTURAL AND TOURISM AGENCIES AGENDA ITEM NO. S' Is am APPEARANCE REQUEST IIMMI _ NOM PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS Ann IMO SUBJECT: CNL .DPP.Evil;� e4;U►C itUi,{ UL4i1,fI � s MIMI MN I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the TAM meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. AMMI IMO WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS VMS MO MIMI FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED AIM dlIMMI BELOW: i AINIM ate WWI MOM MOM ARNIM MEM in Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment ralinl whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will MIND decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakingon an issue, NMI and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to IIMIN do otherwise. OMM IMMI ■ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. -- Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ■ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ■ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. OEM 11 ■ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ■ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP OMNI ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. MONO OMENS .111111. - - OWN MOM MINIM - 1111001 WWI PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME S i-1D4:1 00 0 Nt43 (,(p,1,-,l ADDRESS lSO P /IA.4A 02. 120D oite. 2'-iuls PHONE 11 `-I ' SoSC 11UIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIUIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�JJ 1 BUDGET REQUESTS FOR HUMAN SERVICES, SOCIAL, CULTURAL AND TOURISM AGENCIES AGENDA ITEM NO. APPEARANCE REQUEST ,PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. • Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME ADDRESS Or,', K c l heck VtcP__c � PHONE 3 '-t 2 - L c'L S Cn 1(6,, Coo IMMIN - - O ne AM. - OEM - IMO - - - OM/ U▪ MW - - - M▪ IN Min MEM - OMR SIM MIN NMI O R▪ M MIM 111 MEM IMM MUM MEM MEM Min UMW - - inn OWN NMI IM▪ O MIN MIN MUM MEM MEM MIN MEM MOM - 01 IMP = - M▪ OM MOO IBM O ▪ EM MIMS MIN MOM IMO ENID mlllllllllllllllllllllllillllllillllllilllililllllillillllllllilllllll IIIlillllllll Illlllllllllllllllllllllilliillllllllliliillll�i uIIllUlllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllliillililllll III11111111111111111111111IIill Ilillllllillllllllilllllllllilllliilllllllllll�jj� BUDGET REQUESTS FOR HUMAN SERVICES, SOCIAL, CULTURAL AND TOURISM AGENCIES AGENDA ITEM NO. S' — - ONE NM▪ I M▪ IN _ - IM▪ M Inn In▪ n MIN MIS IMM N INO IMO IMO 11 IIM▪ MB MEM IMMO IMM MOW • NMI APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING SUBJE ORDINANCE TIZENS CO I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN,' WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ■ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of -the Board to do otherwise. • Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ■ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME / °3' � `1ret ADDRESS 3/9— %,t,��~o �I ►' Cc /� 1 - PHONE 9ect- Elllillllllilllillll milllllminilllllililllllllllllllllilllliillllililillllillllilliililllllilllllllllllll mtillllllllid OEM MEM NMI S WIM MOM MOB - MEM IMMO ✓ IM - IMO IMMO IMO - SIM - IMO IMP N MI N NW MOM MIN - - OMR WINN Inn 11.1110 IM▪ O MEM IMM NNW MEM OEM MIN - - MINIM OEM M▪ INN N INO MEM N WN MEM MOM MEMI - Mal MIN �Illllliiilllllllillilllliillllllllllillllilllllill Illilllllillilll IIIIIIIII1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111� BUDGET REQUESTS FOR E. HUMAN SERVICES, SOCIAL, CULTURAL AND TOURISM AGENCIES AGENDA ITEM NO. *S' APPEARANCE REQUEST ,PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED - IMMO MIME INNEN Nam OMNI BELOW: • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakingon an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority oftheBoard to do otherwise. • Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME dLe, it1 ADDRESS u-r.. .,,,., fa n� z-1( r©,-r\r � ewe cJ PHONE -7 71 2'l 3 MEI • MIN UMW SIM NMI Win IMENI Min MIN IBM BIM OMB - - IMM NNW MINN MEM OMB • Elan MEM VINE NNW Minx INIME MEM MEN MIN NEM UMW MINN MIS - SIM IMMM 11 MEM OWN OMNI IMMIN UMW - MOM EOM NMI MOO NEM MIME Illllillilllllllllllilllllllli milillllillllllllllllillillllllillllilllilllllillliilllliilllllllllliillllllllllllllllllilimifil uIIIIIUiiiiliilillliillliillilllllliililllllllllliiliilllililiilllllllllilillliiillllllilllillllllllllllllllllililiilllllllllllin BUDGET REQUESTS FOR HUMAN SERVICES, SOCIAL, CULTURAL - AND TOURISM AGENCIES AGENDA ITEM NO. OM - MINI MED Mr MEM MI NO - MIN APPEARANCE REQUESTIMMO OMNI NM - NM NM IIMM MO NM MIN PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS - - 1011 MN IMO MIN MB IMO SUBJECT: MINI - MO - Min IMO NUM INIM MIN SIM MB NM I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during theMIN UM MO MO NM MS meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. NM ME WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS SIM MOM E FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED i BELOW: Mal NON NMI — NEM MEI INNIM MOO IMME - NIM - NEM - IMM NNW WNW MOM MIN MEM - NMI NMI - • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. • Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME 6.1 ,i, A%/?-1 /Y) 71-ro /Y) ADDRESS "'i' f i 17e rP- r - C H.-Z" P PHONE S5 %- 9 9 - MOM 4111 MEM MIN OMB 11 SEM - EMI 1111011 MEN MIR GIME OEM MIN SIM MIN MMINI IMM MEM 11111110 fiummmiummimminumiffintimilimminunimmummtimmilimmummimmilimmindlilllllllillllillili militlllllllllllllillllllllillllllilld ullllllillllllllilllllllllllliillllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllli� BUDGET REQUESTS FOR NMI MED HUMAN SERVICESMIS , SOCIAL, CULTURAL bNMI AND TOURISM AGENCIES AGENDA ITEM NO. ' OMB VIM IMM APPEARANCE REQUEST INN MOO 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111 MINN MOO Mae IMMO PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: T-R Gcc F (eL v v d i I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. • Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME k �� ST ©�, r y� � b ® Vo ADDRESS aq l 8 C 1 e ww + ,1� h, s LA.) PHONE '7 7z - 13 ri - MOM - - NMI WNW - - - BIM NNW OEM MIM MEP IIMME MOO MIN MEM MIN MEM - OEM - UMW EMM OMB IMM MON MEM MEI MOM MIM MEI 1111.1. - EMI NMI - MOM MIN NMI MIN MUM — MEI 411 11 - NMI - MIS — WAN — MIilililllillilllllllllilllllliillllllllllllilllillllillllllllllllillilllilllilllllliillllillllllillllllllllllillllllll minuali 0IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIN MIN MO MN NM NM BUDGET REQUESTS FOR 110 NV IMP HUMAN SERVICES, SOCIAL, CULTURAL MO AND TOURISM AGENCIES AGENDA ITEM NO. �' IMI ION OM NM MO APPEARANCE REQUEST017 MI _g IMIN XPUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS OM MI MB IMO IIIM NM MIR SUBJECT: ? Le vkCiI n r ( de -t-er I S MN :;:= NMI IIMI I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the _ MI meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. Mil MN NM 11.111 WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS __ FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED MIN BELOW: - - NM IIMINIM. MI NM ■ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, NM NM and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to = do otherwise. _ ■ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. E NINO Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. NINIII IMO IIIIIN MN MN MEN ■ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized NMI MN NM M. speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ _ ..... ■ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. NM NMI WM ■ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or commentsINIIIMI NM IIMMwith the clerk. _ NM MM. NM Inn E ■ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP ME NM SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ....f. ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. MO IMM1 NM MEM PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK — NM _ - MI. MMIN IIIM MEM IMMII NAME NMI IIINIMB o r►% Z RoGL, J t.L.iN rMIMI - NM INIM IMIM At�. Cvre_ o �1. • MIMI — ..... _ _ NMI MEI PHONE MN NA, Ce.... 3.a.�d vri4_,,.,. 3i1z S% i / (ails) NMI MIN 11 - millllllllilllllllilllllil lllliillll I111llililllllllllllillllilllllllililllilillllllllillliilllillllllllilllllillllllllllliiiiiid ulllllllllllllllllllllllliilllllllillllillllllllllllililllllillllliilllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllliilllllll HIE BUDGET REQUESTS FOR HUMAN SERVICES, SOCIAL, CULTURAL E. AND TOURISM AGENCIES AGENDA ITEM NO. S' imm nom wow lom elm BIM MEI s NMI NMI OWN IMO IN RIM - NMI Min NMI 10111. NMI MIR — IMMIN NNW MIME Yam NNW 10 NMI MOM NMI Min OMNI saw s IMMO APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: i \.,J O 6 j k (frvL-(6A i V `d u-, a w. I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. • Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME ) 1), /11 /C2_ ADDRESS `7 S C< �J �, f .›—av_awy 1 PHONE 38' 7-ova OEM MEI SIM MIN MM. IME MIN - - IMO MIN SIM NMI MEI ullllllllillllliilllllll I111111111111111111111111111111111111111IIII I I Illllilllill IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIU,(� ▪ BUDGET REQUESTS FOR - HLI UMAN SERVICES, SOCIAL, CULTURAL AND TOURISM AGENCIES AGENDA ITEM NO. SUBJECT: LC' Mi 4 jele/v,, MOM MIND W▪ WI MINN MINIM - IMO — IMMO OEM M▪ EM MEI IIMEN MOM IMO IMO MINS Man IMMO O▪ EM - MEN O MB NOM 111 O MB IMO IM▪ P U MW O▪ IM IMM N▪ M▪ I IMMM MON IMMOM PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK MEI MIN IMO NMI MOS MEM WINO MEM MMI OMNI MOM MIEN MEM NMI MEM MOMNAME 54.5-/9A) f�1: Ley �'l �i,� l�►NMI — ADDRESS MEM PHONE ieu -/» . /((/ V 4 -▪ ' millllllllliilllllllllillllllllilllllllllliii li llllillili illllllllllllilllil 111111111tlllllllllllllillllillilllllllllllll lllll� APPEARANCE REQUEST XPUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS LAC✓C�j� ✓`' , 95 I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakingon an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority oftheBoard to do otherwise. • Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. r uilllllllllllllil Illlllllillillllllllllllliiilllilllilllllllllll III Ililltl II1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111� BUDGET REQUESTS FOR ▪ HUMAN SERVICES, SOCIAL, CULTURAL ▪ AND TOURISM AGENCIES AGENDA ITEM NO. ' P SUBJECT: ,, t { (. ov,A. Cc t '( l •r�,�Yl� i , l(�_ r I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS OM▪ B Im▪ om - - IMO 111▪ 1 onnO — Moo NMI • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. • Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME ) ti 1L .1 €- (cC ADDRESS 661 L+ ( PHONE cic R (C : Lw - - - - IMO MUM - O NO IOW - - - - - O EM IM▪ O O EM - IMMUI - U▪ MW IMMO ONO O MB IMO — MIR Mob - IMO - IMO - MEM - M▪ ON NMI IM▪ O - IMO - - IME O no Omn - - O EN — O NO - MIS • — inn IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIillilliillllliilllilllllillilllllilllliilll imilllllllllllllll millllillllllllllllilliilllillllillllilllll o uililililllllliillllllllliillllllllllllllllllillilllllllllllllllilllillllillllliiiilllilllliilllllllliilllililllllllllllllllllll� BUDGET REQUESTS FOR HUMAN SERVICES, SOCIAL, CULTURAL F. AND TOURISM AGENCIES AGENDA ITEM NO. ' MID IMO NMI SIM IMO NOM NMI NMI NMI IMM OEM MIR MEM PIO NNW IMO NOM IMMO MIN lam MOM MEM APPEARANCE REQUEST XPUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: R- b L� 1 F2- b- • L l AJ /C I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakingon an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. • Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. MEN OMMI - MIN MOM NNW MEM GUM NMI OEM NMI IMEN PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK 1 - -2-qdl� - lillllililllllillllllllillillllilll IIIIIII Ilillllilllllllilllllilillllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilil�lllllllll I i lll� NAME 8T� ADDRESS L00dFLe PHONE 3 - . _ l �Glli21,51 UIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIilllllln ▪ BUDGET REQUESTS FOR MIMI UM MN MIIIM HUMAN SERVICES, SOCIAL, CULTURAL ION MO 1111.1. Me NM AND TOURISM AGENCIES AGENDA ITEM NO. S' 0:21 OEM AM MN NM UM WM NM MIN MIIINI IMI WM MO Mae APPEARANCE REQUEST MIN INIMI MININ MON AM▪ I AIM MIR ,PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS MOW MED WI NM awl OM IMO IBM HM▪ ISUBJECT: f s r c��t o� . e UM 'E12 F r v t .▪ IM▪ M\ S Ou .c S�}-- I1 f v�(' t \ c . IIMM O —. M▪ N Il MO I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the IMO MIN meeting on the above matter so that I may comment.MN MS Me WM WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED = BELOW: MEM IMIIII AMP IN• UM JIM NMI ■ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment 11•1101 I. whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will IIMB =MO decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakingon an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to MIME NM do otherwise. MIMI AMII OMNI NMI ■ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. MOM ■ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. - M▪ IMI IIMII ■ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ■ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. NMI _ O▪ M▪ B _ A. ■ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP 111 - I.1 MINI SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP MIME IMM▪ O ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM.MOM HINEIMINO PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME C rn % ( v Le Wil — I r� rnm �n t �' ✓1 rn 2 k.c(,A ADDRESS ,s0 Q brytort I Mn ike Roan ace "ih4 2wbt (o PHONE (s- o) 9S? S- 0(3 11�111{Iilllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllillllililllllillillllllllllilllllllllllillliillllllllllllllillllllllllilllillilllllliiillll�i W▪ WI IMM MIN MIMIB MOM MEM MEM IMO IIIMEMB MIN ulllllllillilllllillillllllllllllllllllllllilllllllilllllllllliilllililllllllllllllliillllllllllillllillllllllllllllllllllllllll� BUDGET REQUESTS FOR HUMAN SERVICES, SOCIAL, CULTURAL AND TOURISM AGENCIES AGENDA ITEM NO. S' WM MEM APPEARANCE REQUEST IBM IMM XPUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS 7 ,t WW tL SUBJECT: -per.-� I T G�ai 1. . 11 UMW I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. = WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: - NMI WM NMI WWI IMO IMO Van MOW WOM BMW BMW NMI mMW mem EWE WWI MOW WWI BMW Mom MOM WEB BMW WOO BMW WWI MEW - WWI BON • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakingon an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority oftheBoard to do otherwise. • Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. MWMIM WNW • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognizedMEND IWIMM speaker and audience members is not allowed.WNW • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. _ • INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP MIMMI SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUPNMI ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM.NMI WMI BMW MIMM MEW WNW NMI OMNI IMOM SEM BIM MEM BMW MEM EWE IMMIM NOM BMW WMW MIN WNW MEM 111 IMB - EMI MEM IMM BIM 1111 MIN MEM WMB WPM IMMO PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME ut -{ 3 ADDRESS ,(- C;/-0 //,J EV �c' !`_'eta PHONE 3 Ye-9/ - S~ 7 s i 1111111111111111 IIMMM 11 NMI EMI IMO BMW IMWW WOW WNW MEW BMW Iillllllllllllllllllllllllllliillllilllililllllllilllllillllllillllllillllillllllliilllililllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllilllll�i ulllllllllllllilllllillllllllillllllllllllill IIIIII IIIIIIIIIII Iilllilllllllllil Illililllillillllllilllllllllllllillillllllllllll11 N ▪ O MM▪ I M. IMM M▪ B MO - MOM - MEI N MI N MI NMI NMI MM. MOM MOM MEM P.M — N▪ MI MOM MINN 111 MOM NMI MON — BUDGET REQUESTS FOR HUMAN SERVICES, SOCIAL, CULTURAL AND TOURISM AGENCIES AGENDA ITEM NO. S' (P• APPEARANCE REQUEST XPUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: BLue. Ca.6 Co \i Sep✓ices I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME h e I'- ►Ct Con rrmuni k j sue Sc.rie; be_ ADDRESS 301. Earn Ave . S\A Ro PHONE 34S -841 SexI Ce.S avo Ice, 2 401 MIN MIN NMI OEM O EM - MIN OEM MIN • M▪ IN MEI W PM MIM OMR S EM MRS OMB - W NW MOM IMO IMP IMO MOO MEM MEM IMP MION - MIN M▪ EM MEW OMR IIIIIIillllllllllllllllllillllillllilllilil1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111� Uillllllllltlllll IIIIIIIIIII1111111111111111111111111111111III IIIII Illllllllllllllilllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllll�jj� ▪ BUDGET REQUESTS FOR E HUMAN SERVICES, SOCIAL, CULTURAL - AND TOURISM AGENCIES — n , SUBJECT: (.-c\ r -E --t I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED AGENDA ITEM NO. s- a APPEARANCE REQUEST ,PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS BELOW: — EEO MEE 11111 EWE O RME OMNI MOEN OMER MOM IMOM OMB MEM NMI C- ,t 2 t k c<- alEltE 11 MEM EMI MEMO M▪ OM IMO MOO OMR ME:"!MIM IM▪ O O E▪ M MOM _- - MOE WEE EMI _ OEM ■ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. • Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ■ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK '�. > i �- kNAME IIIMMI :- c f / ��� r IMMO - MIMI N IMII f ') I` a �'( M., ) (' i Il.- j /)r -1F� ' i-,!, - IMMO MEM ADDRESS .:3 ra k,'c. t�_ c. ( k ' , �°_ Lice_ MOM III MOO IMO IMIll MEM IMOD MEM PHONE (ia (c -7C - - GENE OEM 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIN �jlllllillllllllllllllilllllllllllllllillliilllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllillillllllllllllllllllllliililllllllillll� BUDGET REQUESTS FOR E. HUMAN SERVICES, SOCIAL, CULTURAL MOAND TOURISM AGENCIES AGENDA ITEM NO. �' MEI WO MMIS WO MIN MIN MOI MC MOIM MOO MIOS MOM MOM OMM MOI - MOM MEM EMI OMM OEM IMP MEM MEM MOM MOM IMM IMO MMOM OMM MON IMO MOM MIM MEM IMP IOW IMO MEM IMOM MOP MMI 41 = - EMI MOM GEM IMO MOM IMP MOO MOM MI NO - ■ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP IMM SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP MOO ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. _ MON IMO INM MOM MIEM MOO inimmimmimmilimmimmunimmimmilimmimmilimmimmimummummimmimmffirrllilllllllllllllllllliilllllllllllllllllli Illllllilllillllll�i PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK 11111111111111111111 APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: /l c t AA) ac�2 u �� E G� r' � �t F ; /26 �,t_> c,'C!= 4 2 r A s,/—E` I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakingon an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. • Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. NAME (1,0. ,1 /� G o z ,, 011 kk/4- 151 1?1f( ADDRESS y C ' Aki P, L L-L_ ,14 v' E S � C . ;%� ;,<,7,J ()/,/ PHONE Diiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiilltli MO UM ▪ BUDGET REQUESTS FOR MO MN MO MI ▪ HUMAN SERVICES, SOCIAL, CULTURAL MN NM 1.11111 MO 111.111 Ma AND TOURISM AGENCIES AGENDA ITEM NO.' — 11=- MN N M MI APPEMs ARANCE REQUEST - MN NM - MI. NM 11.01. N M MI WO MIMI XPUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS IMO: MN N M IIMI NM ISM MO 111.1 M. NM MO SUBJECT: ��`J U � "��q Cot oav\ov< Q z‘\eA- cc4' - 1 ` ',c t A ' ,l C U cI Y/..0 O M MN Ma NM N MI I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the = MEI Ma meeting on the above matter so that I may comment.MEM MN WM WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED = BELOW: _ — MU _ ■ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will E ME decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakingon an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority oftheBoard to NMI MIN do otherwise. _ _ ■ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. NM▪ I Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ ■ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized MIMI speaker and audience members is not allowed. ■ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. IMO I. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. - - MOM N M MIN SIM NMI INEIM NMI N MI ■ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP MINIM N M N MI SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP UM MIS MEM ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. MOM MOM IMO IIIIM MOO N M IMND - - - M▪ IMI = _ - - MN — N M N M mon — _— '— MIMI N MI NAME IMMII �.�, c com.t).,-) ir') c_..kizcw,m, o-4rc;i-e \�?�� bry j a,ri0 �g1 .1^u1 b.•`,C coo r\c j 1 _ — M▪ IM▪ I MIMI ADDRESS pc,,,1 :s8 — — g PHONE C-2., II _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - - U MW MEIN 1▪ 1111 - .11111. �titllllllllll!ltiIlililitllllillllllllllliiilllllllllllllilllllllilllllllllllllllillilltlillllllllilllllllilllllllilllllilllillt�l WIIIIIIIIII1I111111111111111111111111111111IlIIlII11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111� BUDGET REQUESTS FOR MO NE ME EE HUMAN SERVICES, SOCIAL, CULTURAL ¢ __ NM NM ME FM ME NEI ME MID MEN MI FM IWO AND TOURISM AGENCIES AGENDA ITEM NO.MIIM MEM MO ME MI ENS APPEARANCE REQUEST — NEE NM ENE EEE PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS = En NM MR FM MEENM MI ME SUBJECT: l i r2 G. A).t_ �X j i) ! d ►c-C attic — EMI I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during theNEM ME meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. ME ME WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FM IEEE MEE ME FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTEDIMF Emil IMO BELOW: E _ ■ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will = ME MO EMI decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, MOE and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to :::-: OM do otherwise. _ MEM MEM MEE MEE MEM MEM ■ Speaker will be limited to aMEM p presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ — MEE NM ME IEEE ■ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognizedMEM = speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ — - is Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. WM IIIIM Min NMI is NM Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments OEM MIME OM OEM ME MEE with the clerk. = MEE ■ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. MEM NEM MEE - MEE - MEM MEM 11 PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK = MIMI EMI EME MOM NEMM IMIIM MEI MEE MIIM MOM Ill NEM NMI NEM IMEIM MEM 111 MEM MEM NAME R 0 & a— E I( No nx.5 i,== Y p(oktE FAr%, _ MEM MEE ADDRESS V- D 647( 6 6.-- (CC---EM". — 111 aEMIEI _ MOVE PHONE 449- Cr 6 i ENE - - 1110 mliilllllllillllllllllillllllllilllllllllilllillllillilllllllllllllllllllillllllilllllllllllilillllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllll� Ullillillllllllilllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllilllllillllllllllllililllllllllillllllllilliilllllllllillilllllllllilllllllllllllj� BUDGET REQUESTS FOR HUMAN SERVICES, SOCIAL, CULTURAL AND TOURISM AGENCIES AGENDA ITEM NO. '' MIN MEI IMM 11 NMI IMO NMI NMI INNO IMO NIM IMO NMI MIN - - IMO NMI - - IMP - IMO IMMO NNW ImoMI IMMO MEM - NEM - — - MEM - APPEARANCE REQUEST )(PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: .s g � M / RonAtogr LL.z y root, Px)NTR y I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakingon an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. • Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK WNW - - MOM MEI MINIM - - MEM MEN MEI NMI MEM MEI IMO - - IMO IMO 111110 OWN MIME NMI MOM MINN OMB MIN MIN MIN IOW - MUM - WNW IMM MOW - MOO - MEM MOM 111 11 1 _ NMI IMO MOM - WIMP MIMB 111 MIN MOM o _ OMB OMNI MMIN - - _ 111 MINN OMB 11115 11�IIIIIIilllllllllllllllllllllllillllillllllllllllilillllillllllllllllllillilllllllllilllllilllllllliilllllllllllllillllllllllilll� NAME 64-4,4A1 H /� BERrs 647 ADDRESS 44,3 Fc.Rwtcf�oa (DR//e- (15 cFm,-25,/33 PHONE -389- W7.5- lllllllillllllllllllllllllfllllllllllllllllllllililllllllllllilllilllllllilllllllllillllllillilllllllllllllllilllliilllllllllllll� BUDGET REQUESTS FOR HUMAN SERVICES, SOCIAL, CULTURAL AND TOURISM AGENCIES AGENDA ITEM NO.' sPN ,PUBLIC HEARING SUBJECT: 1, I would like the Chairman of thoard of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: - - APPEARANCE REQUEST ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS /1/7-zi-t • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. • Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME 4/__/21 ADDRESS )62)el 6;2 iT D ni,/�r�� 1„) y PHONE 5 ? p )u c,) MIN MINIM MEN EMI MIN MIN MIN MOM MUM MEM MIN Min - - NM. MOM - MEN RIM - W▪ NW - Min M▪ OP - MI SUM MUM NMI MUM MOMMIMS MOM MOM SIM Min UMM MEN UM▪ W GEM - MIS MWM SIM MEM - MVO MEI Min IIIIIIIIIilllllllllllllllllillilllllllllllllllllillilllillllllllllllililllllllllllllillllililllllllllllllllllilllllllillill mal Ullllllllllilllillllilllllilillllilllllliilliillllllllll llllll lilll llllillllllllliilllllllllilllllllilllllllllilllllllllilllllllin BUDGET REQUESTS FOR MU_ NM NM HUMAN SERVICES, SOCIAL, CULTURAL )MEM MN IMO NIB AND TOURISM AGENCIES AGENDA ITEM NO. *S' 1:21 MIN MI SIM MN MO MO MD MI IIIM OM NM APPEARANCE REQUESTUM MN - NM MI IMINM NM NMI OM ME XPUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTSMIN NM NM ENID MEI NM NM SUBJECT: FaMs ieeq,t,(_ P 3 IMP MIMI MS I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the IIIMMI IMINNI MIN MU NM MI meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. _ MOIR IIIM MB WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS IMMO WM MN FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTEDOM MO M. EMI NM BELOW: _ IMMIP MEM NM ■ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment NM MN whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will MIMI = IMO = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakingon an issue, MEM MIMI and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority oftheBoard to MOM NM IIIIIM IBM do otherwise.MIMI I. IME NMI NM MIMI _ IMO IBM NM ■ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. MIN Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ IMMI r.II r. MID NM MINI isAll comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ MINI IME IMO ■ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times.MIMI MOM NM MINIS — IIIIIIM NM •Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments 111 NMI with the clerk. _ MN is SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN — NMI OMNI NEMII ORGANIZED GROUPOEN Ma = SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUPWWII NM ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. IIIMI IMMi MIS MIN MN 11 IMINII NMIIIIMN _ - MEM PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME /Ur N ChQ c � ,- — L-1 -1--Pi) aG Vo mev1C�k — e_keUo.(fiej ADDRESS ( fib 1 C-(elm A-ci-E PHONE HENN NINO inimmimmimmilimmiimmumnimmiumnimmunimmummiummummummiminimiilllilillllllllii milillllllllllillllililiilllllllll imam ►�Illlllllllllllillllllllllllliillllllllllllllillllllllllllllll lllliilllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllll� BUDGET REQUESTS FOR HUMAN SERVICES, SOCIAL, CULTURAL Ei AND TOURISM AGENCIES AGENDA ITEM NO. *S' N O Ing HIM N ▪ IS XPUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: (2,eque51 I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. EM▪ I WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS IM▪ O FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED IM▪ O BELOW: R▪ IM ■ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakingon an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority oftheBoard to do otherwise. IN▪ AM MIS ■ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ ■ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. 1▪ 1 ■ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. N▪ MI ■ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. MIN NMI ■ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP IN MEM SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. MOM OMM _ - — IMMO APPEARANCE REQUEST PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME Avvi,.t C. Moove ADDRESS CIeLieI end Ave v -e ;&wokP,Vi4 2L1o((L NNW - - - - el▪ M MEI IMM MIEN IM▪ M M▪ OO MEI — NM▪ I IMO - MBE W IND - MIN IN▪ NIM - - IMO MOW MOM IMMO MOM 11 O M, MOM — MEM MIN MIN MEM MIN - IMO IMMIS O IMIN MIN OMM S IM N NE U▪ MNS MOM IMO - - M▪ INN — IBM MEM — MEM a i ifimmumminimimminimmiummummmilimmumummimmummummimmimimmimal1IIIIIIIIillilliillilllllllilllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllmal PHONE (o) 344 - 014 u 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 U BUDGET REQUESTS FOR E. HUMAN SERVICES, SOCIAL, CULTURAL AND TOURISM AGENCIES AGENDA ITEM NO. S- NUS INN inn 1010 INN Nom OMB NMI Iona ISM PONS IMMO 11111 MIN NOM APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ofthe Board to do otherwise. • Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME 0/rev( Ar24S ADDRESS p13,0`j (�iJT•(/1 � , SN/ 7(0/Ag‘ PHONE 31,Z7/9 MIME - - NMI IMMIN NINE MIN CITIZENS COMMENTS - SUBJECT: 4-127-- (Pitfrvi i_061(V OMB BIM IMO 11111 MOM IMO - - Min 11 MEM IMm NMI MEM MINIM ENO SIM INEMB MOM OMNI IMMO ONO 1111111111. - - OMIM MOM NNW Omm Man .111 OEM - NMI MOM MOO MUM NMI MUM .111 MOM - MUM 1111 MON - inma UMW man MEM UMW iillllllllillllllliillllllllllillllllllllilillllllllillllllilllillllllllllllllilllllillililltlllllilillllllllilllllllillllllllll'm Ulllllllllllllllllllillllilililllllllllllilllllllll IIIII I1111111I11111111111111IIillil IIIII1111111111111111111111111111111111111� BUDGET REQUESTS FOR =_ HUMAN SERVICES, SOCIAL, CULTURALAND TOURISM AGENCIES AGENDA ITEM NO. S' SUBJECT: y'A« y 6 / APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING _ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakingon an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. • Speaker will be limited p to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - NOM NMI - MINIM MOM Mal Ommi VINONN PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME 73d/i✓IiCir-40mer" ADDRESS ��()�'% FEar led , 6_. PHONE - - - MEM MINNIN - MEM MEI - - Min NWI - MEM - INMNI NMI MIN MOW MION NOM NMMI - - - - - - MID Or Sinn iMm RIM MONO MIN MIN Imm NMI MENN - MM. MEM - - NMEN - MIN - MOMN fi-=immitinimminimmiuminnimmumiliminiummimummimminimminimillimming UI111111111111III11111111111111111111IIIIIIIIilllllillllllllll lilll lllllilliilllll llil lilllllllllilllllilllllllllllllllillllllll� BUDGET REQUESTS FOR HUMAN SERVICES, SOCIAL, CULTURAL AND TOURISM AGENCIES AGENDA HEM NO. S' (21 APPEARANCE REQUEST XPUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: i...-►- ci N� ._ . Ei t s2 - 4 t,ca:1 r : 1 I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment = whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakingon an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority oftheBoard to do otherwise. ININN Nino EINNI IMM NEM Nina NINO Moe - NINE NEM MINN NIIINI MIN MEI NEM NMI INANNI MINIM Omni INNNN NINE INNNN NMI • Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME 0') } i �- ., M LY �wm rr -- \JLAy �w V ` ADDRESS `_ L-, - i -iza- '/A <" t I r PHONE t' , j, r:Tc MINN - Min NMI Mob NNIN - - NMI - MINN MINN NNW INON MOM .- - MN. MEM MIN INNN MEI NMI NININ MIN - OIM INNIN - MNNI MOD MIN NMI - IMM NOM NNIN 111111111 IMM IMM NMI - MIN MIN MINN IMM lllllllllll111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111l1111111111111llillllllllllllllllllllliilllll� u1111111111111111111111111II111I11I111111I1111IIlIIIIIlI1I111111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1111111111111111III11111111111111111 MI NM BUDGET REQUESTS FOR NM PIM HUMAN SERVICES, SOCIAL, CULTURAL NMI NM NM MI IMO AND TOURISM AGENCIES AGENDA ITEM NO. `S' P y IMO MS UMW MIN M. MOM MI IMM• NM MN MO MN Mb NM NM APPEARANCE REQUEST MN MEI MO NM XPUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS —MI MO - - — MP IMO SUBJECT: ,c\'R\ o \ 1 "1 C a v� \c. e yi 2 C� C> — NM 11=11. NM NOM 1=11 VIM MI AIM I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to me reco nize duringthe MO MEI g meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. MB NM WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESSSIM MI MIMI FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED MIMI MS Mlle NM MN BELOW: NM MIMI Mil NM ■ Each speaker will be given between three to five P ,minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, II and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to E do otherwise. — ■ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only.NMI Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ SIM NM ■ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized MN MO speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ MIN NMI MEM ■ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times.MN MIMI IIMM Il ■ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments OMEN with the clerk. UM — MON IN ■ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP E SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP IIMMI ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. .... .... MIN — MEI II MIN UM 11 M. I I I I I 1111111 111111111 PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME c4 t\ ADDRESS PC) BC.)X \ 3 C ocAu; �4 2.Y�27 PHONE 5 ` o 3 Y3 -- 1.V / F,Al- %I 11 11 MOM MOM MEMO - - IMMIM MIN Illlllllil millllllillllllliilllllllllliiillllllliilllillllliillllllllllilllllllllillllilltlllililllllllllllilllllllllllilmal ullllllllllllliililllllillilliilllllllllllillillllllliilllllllllllll Ilillll IIIlilillllllllliilllllllliililllllllllliillllllillll11 BUDGET REQUESTS FOR HUMAN SERVICES, SOCIAL, CULTURAL AND TOURISM AGENCIES AGENDA ITEM NO. 'S' APPEARANCE REQUEST XPUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS Cr)SUBJECT: Cnrcii cf Qcs�((� h�` z G ]Cr I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. • Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME 2 rrL { Qn (r r ADDRESS tf a�ac? f R00b J'.loo, PHONE b 39- 2 - 2-0 6 3 MED MSS - EMI MEM IME MEP - Mine - MEE MED IMS Min INEM 11 MIM IMED SMI MIS IMP EEM ENNEI InEnn SEM EMI OMR Emi - EMI - MEE IMED MMi BEM MEE MEE MEIE MEE EMI EMB IMP EME MEN EMI - EOM SIM MIS - MEN Ming MDR DEM Imm Elm MEI EMI EEME MEN - MIN MOE MEE MEI SIM EMI - - EWE - IMP MEE NMI Illlllllllilillllllillllllllllllllilllliliiiflll milllllllllllllllillllllllllllilllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllff MO NMI - 11/8 MOO MOM IMMIO MIME 11111/ MOO MOM MOO NOM - - - - MOO - - - MOM IMMOM MOM MOM MOM - - -MUM BUDGET REQUESTS FOR HUMAN SERVICES, SOCIAL, CULTURAL — AND TOURISM AGENCIES AGENDA ITEM NO. "S' APPEARANCE REQUEST ,PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. • Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME R,ck4�J ✓ I V C � Q � iv e h c/ �,�,c. ADDRESS Po o X 2 2- O G a/ v /l e V1-1- i yo / 7 q � PHONE 5 Li 0 r 1 Z -- 6 6 2j - - - ONO - - MOO 1/1111 MOM 1111/11 Moo - - UMW WW1 IMM OMR — MOM EMI 111/11 NMI GOMM — 11111/11 IMMO - 011101 MOM Mp 1/1111 1111/. OMB IMMO 81111111 11/18 M OMNI M .111/1 11 - UM/ ONO ONO OMB - - MOM - MOO OMR MI/ MOM MOO - Mmiiiiimmumm muumuu' num mum mimmintimmimmimminimmimminiiimmind ullllllllillllilllllillllilllllllllllllilllllillllllllill11111IIII111111111IIIIIIiililllllllllillllllillllillllllllillllllllllll�11� BUDGET REQUESTS FOR HUMAN SERVICES, SOCIAL, CULTURAL AND TOURISM AGENCIES AGENDA ITEM NO. ' APPEARANCE REQUEST ,(PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS sow NMI IIIIIIIIIIIII111111III1IIIIIH l MEM WPM NMI NMI NM* - NMI MOM PAM N MI - MEN - 1▪ 11. ISM mon Mom mon - IMO MOM O EM MEM IMMO OEM a a aMIS a IMO I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ofthe Board to do otherwise. • Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK MUM U▪ WE M▪ EM MIME ininimimmitimmummiummummummimmummimmimminumummimmummiummifflllllllllllliilllillllilllillllllllilllilllillilllilllil miff amilllllllllliiiilllllllilillllllllilllilllllllllllllllllllllilllIllllllllllllllllllllillilllllllillillllllllllllllllllilllll in LI BUDGET REQUESTS FOR HUMAN SERVICES, SOCIAL, CULTURAL r TOURISM - AGENDA ITEM 1\V• - ♦ `J1/ - r — r _- r APPEARANCE REQUEST ,PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS — — SUBJECT: '1b t,ti a ` !�/I G0111 JV k11i%ne-wt e_- — I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: _ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to = do otherwise. = • Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME SO tun Le v, ADDRESS Cc - L Tk Se- uq, gel" CtNNayc, PHONE 22-9 - 12-1 C, - MEM UMW Mal Mme - MEI 11 NMI UMW - - Mis - MEM iilllillllllllliillllillillllliii milllillllllliili millllliillllliliillllil mill millllilllllllllillllllililillllll mtr- ullllilllilllllllllllllllillliillllllllllllillllillllilllllllllilllllillillllllllliillillllllllllllllllillllillilllilllillllllll� r - BUDGET REQUESTS FOR — HUMAN SERVICES, SOCIAL, CULTURAL AND TOURISM AGENCIES AGENDA ITEM NO. s' SIM 3� GIMMI - IWO XPlUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS - - SUBJECT: U Yt cl i ‘`L� - / 1` ce-eu___ IM▪ M - • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakingon an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority oftheBoard to do otherwise. - _ _ WIN NO - - - O M U M IMMO O▪ W MOM M▪ O▪ M MIN IMO MIM▪ M IMMO MOMS MOO MO IMMO N OM MOO OW - MEI - 0.111 M▪ OO IMMIO PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK APPEARANCE REQUEST I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: • Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ MOO • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - - - - - _ NAME \jdree th mks - ADDRESS ) a.l , `� c PHONE 5 - 7 3� ��IW▪ O MOO Illlllllllilllllllllilllllllllilllliilllilllillillllillllilllllliilllllllllllllilllillllilllllllllillllllllllllllllilllllllllllif LIIlIIUll11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111I111111111111111111I111111IIIIIIIIIIlIlil111111ll1llllllllllillll11111111111 BUDGET REQUESTS FOR = HUMAN SERVICES, SOCIAL, CULTURAL AND TOURISM AGENCIES AGENDA 1116M NO. S' MMI 111.1 IMP PIM WIN NMI 0 Inn - IMEN - NMI ONE IMO MIN ORM AIM - IMMO MIN - UMW OMNI MEM IMMO MEM MOP MEM MEM 111111 MOON MEM AIME WINE - NMI Min MOM MOM APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: tkl)L4►� A . LAA)0 I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakingon an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority oftheBoard to do otherwise. • Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME + ADDRESS P.04/0o,c., PHONE q B� — 0000 MI/ MOO EMS OEM UMW - MIN - OMR OEM MIN MEM - IMO MM. IMO NMI - MOM - IMO VIM - IMO WOO OMNI -1.1 - MOM - MIME NAMII NMI IMMO BIM - OEM NEM OMB MIN MIN - - IIMOM MEN IMO MIM MIN NOM OMB NMI EMI 'NM - MEM MM. MIN IMO - IMO OMR MEIN trimminumnimmilimminuommummimillimimmimmummimummiunitimmullimmimas uI111Ullllilllillillilllilllllllil111111111111111111111111I11111111IIIIIIIII IIIlililllllllllllllillllillllllllllllllllllillllll� ▪ BUDGET REQUESTS FOR HUMAN SERVICES} SOCIAL, CULTURAL E AND TOURISM AGENCIES AGENDA ITEM NO. APPEARANCE REQUEST X_PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. • Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - - MM. NNW NMI MEN MIN - MON - MEI IMM - IMO OEM IBM RIM • SIM NMI MIN 11 MEW - Min IMO MOM MEW - - O ▪ EM - MOM MEM U MW MOW IMP PLEASE PRINT LEGIIILY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK = — _ _ Iililllllllilllllll millllllilliiilllililillllllliillillllllllllllllllllllllllllliillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllilmell- NAME J r(n C - 4use•-• 51,-3firther5 l;' Coleys ADDRESS ,1701 (4/iik/'L./ Ale i�e , ‘/Q/S PHONE 3'l( Q y ulllllilllllll111111111IIIIiilllllllllllilllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllliillllllillilllIIItilillittlllllllilllltlllllll�_ E. BUDGET REQUESTS FOR HUMAN SERVICES, SOCIAL, CULTURAL AND TOURISM AGENCIES AGENDA ITEM NO. MO MO NM NM IMO IMO INN IMM YIP Nom mem rim NEM - P.M RIM PIM - BIM PIM BIM WNW MININ INIMM IMO Wain NMI IMO MOM MEM MIN IMO MEM MINN - - MOM NMI NOM MEM IMMO Mae PIM s-a APPEARANCE REQUEST £PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: EGUI1 i ly Set-Y(sce cf Oa #i & �a Ue- 1 I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakingon an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority oftheBoard to do otherwise. • Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME ohh r. Per,ca ADDRESS .2 3 FoR.es-F- ke-cc (g. I • PHONE t553 --S3 ( (u) A - 7O '7 (!) MIR - - NOM - - MIS MEM - OMB VIM IMO Mom MOM IMM OEM MEM IMM SIM MEM OMNI INIEN IMO NEM OMB VIM M - OEM OEM Nam MIN MEN - MOM BIM om MON EMS EIMO OMB MIMP IMMO i'�IIIIIIiIIiIIiIIIiIIIIiIItIIIIIiIIIIiIIIIiII1III1IIIiIIIiIIIIIIIIiIIIiIIIIIIIIIiiIIIIiiII1IIItIIIIIIIIIIIIIiiIIiIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1l�i �Illlllilllllllillllilllliilililliillllllllll IIIIIIIIIIiI llllllil II Illllllllllliliilllllllllllllllllllilllilllllllllllllllllllll�jj� BUDGET REQUESTS FOR HUMAN SERVICES, SOCIAL, CULTURAL AND TOURISM AGENCIES AGENDA ITEM NO. S' MIN MEM NMI Inlin - MOM NMI NMI MIS NMI NMI NOM IMO ISM IBM MUM PIM htliM MOM NEM - NMI NMI MIME MEM MEM NMI APPEARANCE REQUEST ,PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT:y,Ck Y''\ MEM I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during theNUM meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. NMI WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS MIME FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: NOM MIME MIMM MIN IMMO • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment111 whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. _ • Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. IMP MOM • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. MIMS Min IMMO IMO IMO OEM OEM IMES IMM IMO • INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME �-- , �� ,-� j , A1P, ADDRESS\ 4 V) dt PHONE 34_ b y 1 X �-13 OMNI - UMW MOM MOM 1111 MEM OMNI - MIN - MIN MOM MEM NNW MEM - IMMO MEM OMNI MEM - MOM OMNI MEM MOM OWN 1111. IMMW Illimmimmuminimmininniummimimmumminummiiiimmmimmumminumnimminli Wiiiilillillllilllllillillllilllllllllllllllllllllllilllllliiiiiiiillllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllliilllllililllillllllllillliifi BUDGET REQUESTS FOR HUMAN SERVICES, SOCIAL, CULTURAL AND TOURISM AGENCIES AGENDA ITEM NO. S' P _ _ APPEARANCE REQUEST _ AIM MOS RIM NMI MIN - MOM NIM NMI NMI NEM NMI MOM MEM MIN MOO MOM 11011111 NOM NNW MEM NEM Mon XPUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS ruNoLL/6- Kopkoi(g 044.4gt-i hegiceivt&-T--1 IMM RIM UMW MEI - ONINIMM — MEIN MUM MEM MEM SUBJECT: IMO I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. • Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK MIN MIN MOM - - SIM OEM UMW IMINN - IMO NOM MEM Mae MM. - IIMME 11 MOM MMI MIME — — NAME — P(0 ()TAS � P ,V�, ��� ID;�` ADDRESS9,)O?jO CO(,,pN(A'L A/C S(A) PHONE 3 �{ 3 — O ( toi- miliillllliilliliiiillillililiiililllilillillllililliillllliililllliiilililllllliliiliilillillllllliiliiilliiiiilillliiiililliilim UIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIn BUDGET REQUESTS FOR HUMAN SERVICES, SOCIAL, CULTURAL AND TOURISM AGENCIES AGENDA ITEM NO. 'S' APPEARANCE REQUEST MINIM ,PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS vt' Avta_Aq-c-A-1 S pone_ SUBJECT: I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakingon an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority oftheBoard to do otherwise. • Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME u&s-f i ADDRESS 2-ct4 5e-6 u 5LtS jt--, t \ ,,A 1 e PHONE 99 a —$Z 7 ((-03(t3-°--2 - - SIM - - MIN MIN - - 11 NMI IMO IMER - IMO - NMI Win NMI UMW NMI SIM 11 MIM MEI MEM Min Inn OMR IMO IMM MEM MIN MOO MOM MOO OIM MEM - MN. MIN IMO MEI IMMEN NEM 11 - Min - IBM IMM - NMI - MOM MEN MEM IBM Illlllllllilllliilllllllllllliilllllllilliiillil millllllllllilllilllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllillllllllilllllllllllm ROANOKE VALLEY GREENWAY COMMISSION Overview of the Proposed Budget for FY 1999 Approved January 1998 Serving Roanoke City, Roanoke County, Salem and Vinton INTRODUCTION The purpose of this document is to provide an overview of the planned fiscal activity of the Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission for FY 1999 (July 1, 1998 through June 30, 1999). The projected fiscal activity includes anticipated revenues and expenditures. Line Item Budget. The line -item budget is presented in two pages, anticipated revenues and planned expenditures. The revenues of the Commission are separated according to type of contributor: Local Governments and Greenway Grants/Donations. In partial support of its proposed $133,100 budget, the Commission receives $30,000 in direct funding from the localities it serves, with costs shared on a per capita basis. The balance of funding will originate from grants and donations requested from federal, state and private sources interested in supporting greenway initiatives. Expenditures include not only the salary and office expenses for the Greenway Coordinator, but also design and planning services for a variety of greenway projects. Other Financial Information. An overview of funds allocated to projects during calendar year 1997 is included in the annual report. That investment table provides a breakdown of $1,487,510 in federal, state, local and private funds allocated for greenways throughout the Valley last year. The investment report does not reflect the thousands of volunteer hours and substantial in - kind services which have been contributed by the Valley's citizens and agencies in support of the greenway program. Also excluded are donations of land or easements, with the investment table representing actual cash contributions. The 3,570 volunteer hours, $6,613 worth of pro bono services, and $319,225 in easements and land donations are shown elsewhere in the annual report. Roanoke City Bond Referendum. The citizens of Roanoke City set a landmark for greenways when they approved a bond referendum in November 1997 that included $250,000 for development of greenways. Individuals interested in more detailed information may contact the Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission at 776-7159. r z 0 1- 0w >- U (� � m z wz cw (Dw J O) J Cr) wLL 0 z 0 REVENUES w U 0 0 LOCALITIES Contribution 0 0 0 0 ch to 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0c N N LO VI0 O � EA M co cc) O� N Eli fH co a) o 0 0 0 as N ti N a) 0 a) d 0 O c) O c0 +_= N. e- co co a o N r 0 a ROANOKE CITY ROANOKE COUNTY W -J SUBTOTAL ANTICIPATED GREENWAY GRANTS AND DONATIONS DUPONT FOUNDATION co Q wW O w CCU z O Z W oc 1� cn O a cc.J w� Z 0 ¢ O lL I Z_ Z H� Om a� OTHER FOUNDATIONS SUBTOTAL O 0 M c) GRAND TOTAL Z 0 N N Q • w a� Z 0 w Z C X (.9 W w J cn cn J > u- w 0 z 0 EXPENDITURES 01 - 0 CO CA 0 ID CO Qi Q1 9 Cl69 CO 69 ift 1- wp W co 03 w� wo E g�- �zcQnw Oz (D O w(n aw ADMINISTRATION 0000000000 O O O 0 O d-O O O O CO O. I� I� O CO 'I' O N N N 69E9 E/} E9 � E9 69 69 E9 69 E9 O z z ce z> W a¢ POSTAGE 1- w z w Z W LL O z Z O W = J Q' CL W W > le O (n w 7.1 W CLa Jr U W U O H oa 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O r L0O O O O 0 O 0 O 0C) 0000000000N. y, 69 ft 611. 69 69 69 69 fA 69 U w U w cc > U j W cc U • —ccw} Y O o Y c Q UUQZDO z w w O WOLF CREEK z O Y Y () aUwzww m O IX Z OJ > Z walla SUBTOTAL 0 0 ri 6▪ 9 GRAND TOTAL 0 10 0 �. CN CY) 0 0 0 N 0 0) 0) 00 0) OC w CO >- 0 N 0 00 0 10 0 00000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �t C) N NOLLV1fldOd J3O1O 10 00 A,:tion Through Sound Planning PF ESIDENT W. Lee Wilhelm, III VICE PRESIDENTS R. Daniel Carson, Jr. Thomas B. Jones Robert Frantz BOARD OF DIRECTORS Reid W. Ammen M. Helen Butler Landon Catron Ashby W. Coleman T. Joe Crawford Diane Disher Robert H. Fetzer Jan B. Garrett Shelby P. Hamlett Connie Holbrook-Knighten Sherman Holland Carol Huffman Sydney Nordt Marilyn A. Rigby John Sabean Robert Scharpf Henry J. Sullivan Patti Van Sandt Faith M. Wilson EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Raleigh Campbell COUNCIL OF COMMUNITY SERVICES March 11,1998 TO: FROM: RE: 502 Campbell Avenue, S.W. (24016) P.O. Box 598, Roanoke, Virginia 24004 (540) 985-0131 • Fax # (540) 982-2935 Human Service Professionals/Volunteers Pam Kestner-Chappelear 1998 Human Services Assembly With less staff available to carry out the critical functions of our organizations coupled with an increased demand for our services, we must use what resources we have available to us and use them wisely. One such resource is right at our fingertips... literally. Cyberspace or the Internet are terms we hear all the time now. But have you had the opportunity to truly explore why and how we can use the Internet to be more efficient and effective as providers of human services? Well, this year's Human Services Assembly is focusing on the Internet and how we all can utilize it in our day-to-day operations. We also will explore the impact this technology is having on our community. Please join us for: "The Internet: Connecting People & Communities" Thursday, April 16,1998 - 8:00 a.m. - 11:00 a.m. Gainsboro First Baptist Church, Roanoke Cost: FREE The keynote speaker will be Jeff Crowder who is Network Virginia Director with Virginia Tech 's Communication Department. Jeff will provide a foundation of understanding of the Internet as well as explore how we can make the most of this resource. After the keynote, there will be two workshops held concurrently... one will explore further how we can make the Internet work for us and the other will focus on accessing services. We encourage you to send at least two staff members so your organization can take advantage of both workshops!! Also, we are offering the opportunity for agencies to share their resource materials with participants by setting up resource tables during the Assembly. To register for the Assembly and to reserve your resource table, simply complete the attached Registration Form and return it to the Council no later than April 10, 1998. We look forward to seeing on April 16th! UnIad way ParineoVency COUNCIL OF COMMUNITY SERVICES PRESENTS ITS 1998 HUMAN SERVICES ASSEMBLY "The Internet: Connecting People d Communities" Keynote: Jeff Crowder, Network Virginia Director Virginia Tech Communications Department Thursday, April 16, 1998 8:00 a.m. - 11:00 a.m. Gainsboro First Baptist Church (Across from Hotel Roanoke) Cost: FREE For more information call: 540/985-0131 Preregistration is required by April 101 Complete the Form below & mail to: CCS, PO Box 598, Roanoke, VA 24004 or Fax to: 540/982 - 2935 NAME OF AGENCY PARTICIPANT(S)NAMES PHONE# FAX# E-MAIL Yes. please reserve a table for our resource information (brochures, posters, etc.)! Science Museum of Western Virginia Educational Services Provided to Roanoke County 1996-97 Outreach & In -Museum Star Lab Apple Ridge Roanoke CountyVisitors Totals 16,357 362 1012 7,519 25,250 Roanoke County Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Totals Back Creek 0 0 0 40 0 40 0 40 40 0 0 0 160 Bent Mountain 0 0 0 19 84 0 21 0 136 102 19 0 381 Burlington 0 0 0 0 437 0 0 0 0 130 215 0 782 Cave Spring 0 0 0 101 96 94 379 0 184 302 96 0 1252 Cave Spring High 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 20 Clearbrook 0 0 90 194 136 96 44 134 75 90 155 67 1081 Ft. Lewis 0 0 0 26 78 54 26 26 26 52 130 39 457 Glen Cove 0 0 88 144 163 88 88 171 88 88 358 0 1276 Glenvar 0 0 66 0 76 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 142 Glenvar Middle 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 99 0 99 Green Valley 0 0 60 68 194 139 0 126 128 188 128 68 1099 Herman L Horn 0 0 257 169 88 88 338 169 257 169 169 0 1704 I Mason's Cove 0 0 0 49 49 0 49 49 103 49 0 51 399 1I Mt. Pleasant 0 0 0 187 66 66 66 0 0 0 132 0 517 Mt. View 0 0 0 154 L 78 0 197 78 0 157 234 0 898 Oak Grove 0 0 260 336 260 172 168 354 508 340 438 0 2836 ! Penn Forest 0 0 0 88 88 99 0 88 0 88 296 0 747 W E Cundiff 0 0 0 251 448 160 332 352 316 256 267 86 2468 William Byrd 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 0 0 0 0 39 TOTALS Outreach and In -Museum 0 0 821 1826 2341 1096 1708 1626 1881 2011 2736 311 16357 Star Lab 0 0 0 0 150 0 0 0 96 20 96 0 362 Apple Ridge 0 0 146 133 208 17 0 0 117 58 228 105 1012 Roanoke County Visitors 711 660 372 484 599 437 522 598 830 851 515 940 7519 Total Served 711 660 1339 2443 3298 1550 2230 2224 2924 2940 3575 1356 25250 nry BLUE RIDGE COMMUNITY SERVICES Roanoke County Budget Work Session March 24,1998 Good evening. I am Sue Scheibe, a resident of Roanoke County, appointed by you to serve on the Blue Ridge Community Services Board of Directors. On behalf of the staff and Board, thank you for this opportunity to discuss our budget request for FY99, beginning July 1,1998. All community services boards in Virginia are directed by the Department of Mental Health, Mental Retardation and Substance Abuse Services to request amounts from the participating local governments which will provide at least a 90:10 ratio between state base funds and local tax funds. In order to meet this requirement, we are requesting an increase of $164,512 to the $545,252 tax dollars allocated by our five member governments for the current year. Based on the service utilization formula established in 1983, our request from Roanoke County for FY99 is $108,204. We are appreciative of the support you have given us in the past, which has enabled us to provide much needed assistance to the citizens of Roanoke County with disabilities related to mental illness, mental retardation and substance abuse. In FY97, 1,361 Roanoke County citizens 1 were served by Blue Ridge Community Services in a variety of treatment programs, in addition to 741 prevention contacts, at a cost of $2,075,101 versus $1,965,382 the previous year. For every tax dollar allocated by Roanoke County during FY97, over $26 worth of services were provided to its citizens. As you may be aware, with the continued downsizing of state institutions, the number of persons requiring community based services has continued to increase over the years. Unfortunately, local funding has not increased at the same rate. As an example, Roanoke County has not increased its funding level to our agency since 1992, despite significant growth of 33% in services provided to residents of the County. It is one of only four counties in Virginia contributing less than $1.00 per capita to their local community services boards. As your budget deliberations proceed, I would ask you to keep in mind our responsibility to the needs of the disabled citizens of Roanoke. Many of these individuals are not only severely disabled, but have low incomes which prevents their utilization of services in the private sector. The mission of BRCS continues to be the provision of a necessary range of Fr services in the least restrictive setting and most cost effective method possible. Thank you for allowing us this opportunity to present our FY99 budget request, and for your time and attention. We will be happy to answer any questions you may have. 3 Roanoke County request 3/24/98 Western Virginia Land Trust Grant Request County of Roanoke Board of Supervisors' Meeting, March 24, 1998 Good evening. I am Rupert Cutler, Executive Director of the Western Virginia Land Trust. The Western Virginia Land Trust is a new, private, publicly supported, not - for -profit charitable organization created by Roanoke Valley conservationists two years ago to help protect important local landscapes and greenway rights of way, primarily by means of voluntary conservation easements. It obtained its IRS 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status one year ago and currently has 273 dues -paying members. It works as an educational arm of the Virginia Outdoors Foundation, a state -chartered agency which currently holds perpetual conservation easements on over 110,000 acres of open -space lands in the Commonwealth. By working closely with the staffs of Roanoke County Department of Planning, the 5th Planning District Commission, the Blue Ridge Parkway, the Jefferson National Forest and the Appalachian Trail Conference, we are in the process of determining which private (and public) open space lands and greenway trail rights of way are of greatest importance to the general public maintained in a relatively undeveloped state. Selection criteria such as high elevation (i.e., highly visible mountainsides and ridgelines), views from the Blue Ridge Parkway and the Appalachian Trail, endangered plant and animal species habitats, floodplains, and greenway routes are being used to create this inventory of parcels of land with high public values. Our next step will be to bring the owners of these lands together with other private landowners in the region who already have agreed to protect the conservation values of 2 their lands by donating permanent conservation easements to the Commonwealth of Virginia or to a private land trust, to inform them of the income and estate tax -saving benefits and other reasons to participate in such a voluntary open space land -protection program. We will hold community educational forums for landowners, lawyers and appraisers to spread the word in this region as to how our "sense of place" --our natural and cultural heritage --can be saved in a way that is sensitive to the property rights of private landowners. In its grant -application letter of December 16, 1997, the Western Virginia Land Trust requested a grant of $25,000 from Roanoke County in the 1998-99 fiscal year in support of the land trust's operating budget. You received copies of the letter at that time. I hereby provide another copy of the complete request together with Mr. Hodge's acknowledgment letter and a letter of support from former Supervisor Lee B. Eddy. Because the Western Virginia Land Trust is based here in the Roanoke Valley, it will use close -at -hand opportunities to obtain local greenway rights of way, to protect local watersheds, and to save the outstanding views from the Blue Ridge Parkway and the Appalachian Trail in Roanoke County as its first order of business. In other words, it will help Roanoke County implement the open space section of its comprehensive plan by doing what the county cannot do by way of offering economic incentives to private landowners to voluntarily restrain development on their lands. If we succeed, there will be less need for public land acquisition and private land regulation --certainly a desirable outcome. Thank you for your consideration. 2211 Pommel Drive Roanoke VA 24018 January 15, 1998 Chairman Bob Johnson and Members Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 Dear Bob and Board Members: I understand that Rupert Cutler has asked the Board for an FY98/99 contribution of $25,000 to help fund the Western Virginia Land Trust. The Land Trust is a new organization formed about the same time as the Greenway Commission and with a very similar objective, to preserve and enhance the environmental quality of our region. I believe the Land Trust will be a valuable partner with Roanoke County in helping to implement protection of our critical viewsheds, ridge lines and steep slopes, and also has the potential to minimize undesired development along the Blue Ridge Parkway. The County's recent Visioning Study showed the strong interest County citizens have in preserving and protecting our visual environment. I believe that a contribution to the Western Virginia Land Trust will be supported by a vast majority of our taxpayers as a most worthwhile investment. Sincerely, J Lee B. Eddy copy: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (540) 772-2004 January 15, 1998 1ILTunt vaxrake P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (540) 772-2193 Dr. M. Rupert Cutler, Executive Director Western Virginia Land Trust P. O. Box 18102 Roanoke, Virginia 24014-0797 Dear Rupert: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BOB L. JOHNSON, CHAIRMAN HOLL NS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS, VICE-CHAIRMAN VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT LEE B. EDDY WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FENTON F. 'SPIKE' HARRISON, JR. CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL -FUZZY' MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (540) 772-2005 This is to acknowledge receipt of your recent letter to Board Chairman Bob Johnson requesting an appropriation of $25,000 in Roanoke County's 1998-99 budget. Your request has been sent to our Budget Manager for provisional inclusion in the upcoming budget. We do not at present know just how much will be available for such contributions, but your request will certainly be given every consideration. The County Board will hold a public hearing in April on our proposed budget. Representatives of the various agencies requesting funds are encouraged to attend to answer any questions that the Supervisors may have. If you have any questions about this procedure, please call Brent Robertson (772-2021) or me. I appreciate your comments about our new tree conservation ordinance. It applies only to County -owned property and excepts County school lands, but it is a small step in the right direction. Thanks for your kind words about Sue. She has thoroughly enjoyed her work at Explore, and in my opinion, "great teacher and great lady" only scratch the surface. Very truly yours, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ECH/meh cc - Mr. Bob L. Johnson, Chairman; Board of Supervisors Mr. W. Brent Robertson, Budget Manager Western —Virginia Land Trust P. O. Box 18102 Roanoke, Virginia 24014-0797 Phone/Fax 540/985-0000 E-mail mrcutler@aol.com EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Dr. M. Rupert Cutler BOARD OF TRUSTEES Barbara B. Lemon President Mary Ann Johnson Vice President Murray K. Coulter, Jr. Treasurer Elizabeth H. Belcher Secretary Charles A. Blankenship E. Cabell Brand Lynn M. Davis Lucy R. Ellett Sibyl N. Fishburn David P. Hill Robert G. Hoak Robert H. Hunt George A. Kegley Robert B. Lambeth, Jr. Stephen W. Lemon Jack Loeb, Jr. Leonard A. Muse James R. Olin Janet Scheid Catherine B. Smeltzer James M. Turner, Jr. James L. Woltz December 16, 1997 Mr. Bob Johnson Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Dear Bob: The trustees of the Western Virginia Land Trust respectfully request a grant of $25,000 from Roanoke County in the 1998-99 fiscal year in support of the land trust's operating budget, to enable the Roanoke Valley's only land trust to more aggressively act to preserve pastoral Blue Ridge Parkway views, endangered species habitats, greenway trail rights of way, and historic sites through voluntary means such as conservation easements. Our work is done primarily on private lands, in close coordination with the County's planning staff. Ms. Janet Scheid of your staff is a member of the Western Virginia Land Trust's Board of Trustees and Chair of its Planning and Technical Review Committee. Organizational Description and Mission Statement Land trusts are local, independent nonprofit organizations that help protect open land important to the quality of life and environmental health of their communities or regions. Over 1,100 separate land trust organizations, with a combined membership of 900,000 people, are saving land throughout the country. The initiative to form the Western Virginia Land Trust was taken in 1996 by a group of Roanoke Valley citizens who saw in a land trust the means to obtain rights of way across private land for the envisioned regional greenway hike -bike trail network. Its founders also are concerned about recent losses of high -quality views from the Blue Ridge Parkway and the Appalachian Trail. A letter advising that the Western Virginia Land Trust is exempt from federal income tax as a 501(c)(3) organization was issued by the Internal Revenue Service on March 7, 1997. Aprivate foundation providing voluntary means to promote the preservation of western Virginia's natural and cultural heritage Bob Johnson December 16, 1997 Page two I became executive director of the land trust on March 1, 1997. My employment was made possible by a grant from a family trust based in Pittsburgh, which recently provided the land trust with an additional major grant for operating expenses. While it has not been announced publicly, the Virginia Environmental Endowment has informed us that we will receive a generous grant from that source to conduct an inventory of critical private lands adjoining the Parkway and the Jefferson National Forest and to work with owners of those lands to encourage them to donate conservation easements to protect public values. Some 230 individuals in western Virginia already have become members of our new organization. The mission of the Western Virginia Land Trust is to provide voluntary means to promote the preservation of western Virginia's natural and cultural heritage. Its goals are: • To preserve, through conservation easements and fee -simple acquisition, the scenic, historic, architectural and ecological features of the landscape. • To keep land available for agricultural, forestal, recreational and open -space uses. • To increase awareness of the significance of the region's natural and cultural features and the need to preserve them. • To educate the public about ways to provide protection in perpetuity of the land and its many associated values. • To encourage respect for the environment and the appropriate use of its resources. • To advise landowners of the economic benefits associated with entering into conservation easements and agricultural and forestal district agreements. • To seek ways to develop land with minimal disturbance of the environment. Amount of Grant Request The amount of $25,000 is respectfully requested in support of the organization's calendar year 1998 operating budget of $138,000. A copy of the organization's tentative budget is enclosed. Project Summary In the organization's second year of activity, the focus will be on: • developing a region -wide membership base, • producing basic educational materials on the land trust and on conservation easements, • creating local committees of interested and supportive citizens throughout the region; identifying and prioritizing land -conservation needs and opportunities; and • successfully negotiating with landowners to obtain conservation easements on a number of key open -space tracts in the greater Roanoke Valley area, the easements to be held by the Virginia Outdoors Foundation. Bob Johnson December 16, 1997 Page 3 Procedures for Program Evaluation The Western Virginia Land Trust will maintain regular communication with the Land Trust Alliance in Washington, DC and with the Virginia Outdoors Foundation to compare our programs and progress with "the norm" for a new land trust, with feedback used to improve our programs. A review body made up of representatives of the Piedmont Environmental Council, the Valley Conservation Council, the Virginia Outdoors Foundation and the Land Trust Alliance will be invited to critique our performance and make recommendations for improvement. Board of Directors The officers of the Western Virginia Land Trust are Barbara B. Lemon of Roanoke, President; Mary Ann Johnson of Rocky Mount, Vice President; Murray K. Coulter, Jr. of Roanoke, Treasurer; and Elizabeth H. Belcher of Roanoke, Secretary. Mrs. Lemon is a graduate and former trustee of Randolph Macon Woman's College and a member of the boards of directors for Thomas Jefferson's Poplar Forest and Union Theological Seminary (Richmond). Mrs. Johnson is a graduate of Hollins College, Book Page Editor of the Roanoke Times, and a member of the North Cross School and Roanoke Valley Historical Society boards. Mr. Coulter is a graduate of Virginia Tech, a CPA, a partner in the accounting firm of Brown, Edwards & Co., and a member of the boards of The Achievement Center School and Planned Parenthood of the Blue Ridge. Mrs. Belcher has a master's degree in forestry from Virginia Tech, has worked as a forester for the Jefferson National Forest, and serves as Roanoke Valley Greenway Coordinator. Other members of the board are: Charles A. Blankenship, Lynn M. Davis, Lucy R. Ellett, Sibyl N. Fishburn, David P. Hill, George A. Kegley, Stephen W. Lemon, Jack Loeb, Jr., Leonard A. Muse, James R. Olin, Janet Scheid, Catherine B. Smeltzer, James M. Turner, and James L. Woltz of Roanoke; E. Cabell Brand and Robert H. Hunt of Salem; and Robert B. Lambeth of Bedford. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, M. Rupert Cutler, Ph.D. Executive Director 1-98 Impact of the loss of H.U.D. Supportive Housing grants to T.A.P. - T.L.C. (during one fiscal year): Funding for TLC's "Networks" - Intensive Family Case Management program - ends April 14, 1998, leaving at least 12 families without follow-up services after transition to permanent housing, and without crisis recovery aid to prevent loss of housing again. These families include 30 children. TLC needs $45,000 to maintain this program for a year, at an average cost of only $3500 per family, and an average success rate over 80%. If TLC loses its major H.U.D. Supportive Housing grant as of November 30, 1998 (approx. $270,000, or 63% of the program budget), approx. 100 families, including 50 children, who become homeless in the Roanoke Valley and surrounding area, will have no transitional housing with case management services. In many cases, homeless persons with mental and physical disabilities or other special needs, i.e. emotionally disturbed children, will remain homeless, because area emergency shelters cannot serve them, and do not want to expand their services. Homeless persons with such special needs cannot be stabilized, empowered and successfully transitioned with emergency shelter only. The cost of the TLC's coordinated, comprehensive services is only $25.00 per day per person (average). State, local, and private funds, at least $130,000 per year, may also be lost without the H.U.D. grant. Twelve full time TLC staff, with over 50 years of combined experience in working with homeless persons, will be lost. The TLC has an effectiveness rate of 70% (average), and saves an estimated $500,000 (at least) annually in other public dollars. The long-range savings in human services monies is immeasurable. 3/98 Update: Despite efforts by our congressional representatives, state legislators, local government leaders, and other supporters, H.U.D. would not change the decision to deny funding to TAP -TLC for continuation beyond 11/30/98. TAP will re -apply under the Roanoke Valley Continuum of Care this Spring for renewal and expansion of the TLC program. If this proposal is successful , HUD grant funds_may_be_available to TAP for .TLC. in February _ 1999, at the earliest. For more information, contact Ellen Brown at TAP - 540-3456781, ext. 4336. ACTION # ITEM NUMBER % 1/ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 24, 1998 AGENDA ITEM: Request to vacate a portion of a 10-foot public utility easement located across Lots 6, 7, 8, 16, 17, and 18 (tax map #27.13-3-27), Section 2, Starmount, as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 135, located in the Hollins Magisterial District and shown on attached map. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The petitioners, North Roanoke Baptist Church Trustees, are requesting that the Board of Supervisors vacate a portion of a 10-foot public utility easement. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: North Roanoke Baptist Church Trustees is the owner of Lots 6, 7, 8, 16, 17, and 18 (tax map #27.13-3-27), Section 2, Starmount, as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 135, located in the Hollins Magisterial District. They are requesting that the Board of Supervisors vacate a portion of a 10-foot public utility easement no longer needed because no public or county utilities reside within those portions of the existing easement to be vacated. This vacation will allow the owners to construct an addition to their church. County staff received no objections to the vacation from the applicable County departments or public utility companies. Therefore, Roanoke County is requesting that the described portion of the public utility easement be vacated in accordance with Chapter 22, Title 15.2-2272 (2), Code of Virginia 1950, as amended. A first reading and public hearing is scheduled for March 24, 1998, and a second reading is scheduled for April 14, 1998. 1 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: County staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt the proposed Ordinance to vacate a portion of the referenced public utility easement and instruct the County Attorney to prepare the necessary ordinance. MITTED BY: c APPROVED BY: Arnold Covey, 1 ec or Elmer C. Hodge of Engineering and Inspect' ins County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved () Motion by: Denied () Harrison Received () Johnson Referred McNamara To Minnix Nickens pc: Paul Mahoney, County Attorney 2 No Yes Abs NORTH z5 O 74. 4 t MINIMUM /4 9UILOIN6 c-, \ j • �;�, 23. /j6 Gr • //' MINIMUM 52.40' BUI LOING 6.3 77' ARC' �Pl AA'` ` 90.4q' UIy, PvGLlc /5 N 72•- 58'E AVE. -- 5 72' 56'W 37.65. g2.46 78.52' ARC /1.48 ul ti LINE -1, /00.0' 90.0' 90.0' N 72 -• 56'E -- 4 76. 0' V/R 6/N/A SUILD/Nt 6 7 BLOC 7 N •I ur/L T _. CASEMENT 90.00' 72•-56'E-- /6 90.0' W O to 0 N 90. 00' a 0- f 0 17 13.0' 77.0' M04 . P U. E. TO BE VACATE D 4 r as 5 tt �Z\N. ��29 Gib 8 a o\ \� eSeTZSZ \ '- A•o 7.4 130 n) 0 0 N N N ti t -I 4 p 20 1 90.0' 100.0. /00.0' N 72'- 43'E --•• 467.0' N/NWA Y N4 // 7 ROANOKE COUNTY REQUEST TO VACATE A PORTION OF A 10-FOOT PUBLIC ENGINEERING & UTILITY EASEMENT LOCATED ACROSS LOTS-6,7,8,16,17, AND 18 (TAX MAP %27.13-3-27), SECTION 2, STARMOUNT, INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT As RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 135, LOCATED IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF A 10-FOOT PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT LOCATED ALONG THE REAR PROPERTY LINES OF LOTS 6, 7, 8, 16, 17 AND 18, (TAX MAP NO. 27.13-3-27), SECTION 2, STARMOUNT, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 135, IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, by subdivision plat entitled "Map of Section No. 2, STARMOUNT", dated September 15, 1954, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Plat Book 3, page 135, M. A. Dillard and Kathryn J. Dillard created certain public easements, including a public utility easement along the rear property lines of Lots 6, 7, 8, 16, 17 and 18; and, WHEREAS, the petitioners, North Roanoke Baptist Church Trustees, are the owners of Lots 6, 7, 8, 16, 17 and 18, Section 2, Starmount; and, WHEREAS, the petitioners have requested that said public utility easement be vacated by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, pursuant to Section 15.2-2272.2 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), which requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, WHEREAS, there being no objection raised by the appropriate public utility companies entitled to use the subject easement; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by Section 15.2-2204 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and a first reading and public hearing of this ordinance was held on March 24, 1998; and the second reading of this ordinance was held on April 14, 1998. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the public utility easement, being ten feet (10') in width and extending approximately 270 feet in length, along the rear property lines of Lots 6, 7, 8, 16, 17, and 18, Section 2, Starmount, in the Hollins Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, as shown on the subdivision plat entitled "Map of Section No. 2, STARMOUNT", dated February 1, 1976, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 3, page 135, and as further shown on the Exhibit attached hereto, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to Section 15.2-2272 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and, 2. That, as a condition to the adoption of this ordinance, all costs and expenses associated herewith, including but not limited to publication costs, survey costs and recordation of documents, shall be the responsibility of the petitioners, North Roanoke Baptist Church Trustees, or their successors or assigns; and, 3. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption, and a certified copy of this ordinance shall be recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in accordance with Section 15.2-2272.2 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended). c:\wp51\doc\agenda\eng\northrke.ord 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998 ORDINANCE 032498-12 AMENDING AND REENACTING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA BY THE ADOPTION OF THE ROANOKE VALLEY REGIONAL STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN AS PART OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHEREAS, Roanoke County and other jurisdictions within the Roanoke Valley have experienced a recurrent history of flooding of properties; and, WHEREAS, this flooding has resulted in the Toss of property and the disruption of the lives of many Roanoke County citizens; and, WHEREAS, Roanoke County and other Valley jurisdictions have cooperatively joined together to fund and prepare the Roanoke Valley Regional Stormwater Management Plan (The Plan); and, WHEREAS, the Plan was prepared under the coordination of the Fifth Planning District Commission, and involved the extensive involvement of citizen and technical advisory committees; and, WHEREAS, the Plan is future oriented and addresses flooding, stormwater, and drainage issues within sixteen priority watersheds within the Roanoke Valley; and, WHEREAS, the Plan specifically provides an enhancement to the 1993 FEMA Flood Insurance Study, incorporates recommended stormwater master plans for each of the sixteen priority watersheds, contains specific recommendations for multi jurisdictional projects and policies, and contains recommended implementation strategies that if implemented, will reduce existing flooding problems and minimize future damages for 1 many citizens within Roanoke County; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission reviewed the Plan on March 3, 1998 and after holding a public hearing, has recommended the incorporation of the Plan as part of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, first reading of this ordinance was held on March 10, 1998 and second reading was held on March 24, 1998 BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia as follows: 1. That Roanoke County, Virginia accepts the analysis, design and flood reduction recommendations contained within the Plan and appends the Comprehensive Plan of Roanoke County to include these components of the Plan; and, 2. That the Plan shall be used a general guide for implementing the recommended improvements as future funding sources are identified and funding is allocated for specific projects; and, 3. That this ordinance shall be in effect from and after March 24, 1998 On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 2 cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning George Simpson, Assistant Director, Planning & Zoning Mary F. Parker, Clerk, City of Roanoke Forest Jones, Clerk, City of Salem Carolyn Ross, Clerk, Town of Vinton Wayne Strickland, Executive Director, Fifth Planning District Commission 3 ACTION NO. 1 ITEM NO. a-1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: March 24, 1998 Second Reading of an Ordinance Approving the Roanoke Valley Regional Stormwater Management Plan as an Amendment to the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: Roanoke County, Roanoke City, the City of Salem and the Town of Vinton recently participated in the preparation of a regional stormwater management plan for the Roanoke Valley. The Fifth Planning District Commission coordinated the preparation of the Plan. The planning process involved the participation of technical and citizen committees that oversaw and directed the process. The Roanoke Valley Regional Stormwater Management Plag,(the Plan), was completed in October 1997. I have attached an executive summary of the Plan to this report. A complete copy of the Plan is in the Board offices. The Plan contains recommendations and master plans to address stormwater management and flooding issues in sixteen priority watersheds within the Roanoke Valley. It contains recommendations for multi -jurisdictional projects and policies, and contains specific implementation recommendations, that if implemented, will reduce existing flooding problems and minimize future damages for many citizens within Roanoke County. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Plan will serve as a valuable planning tool as we seek to mitigate and prevent future flooding in Roanoke County. The 2 various projects identified in the Plan will serve as a general guide for stormwater improvements as future funding sources to implement the Plan are identified and funding is allocated for specific projects. In addition to these planning benefits, the adoption of the Plan as a component of our community's Comprehensive Plan also allows us to maintain our current high rating in FEMA's Community Rating System Program. Our high rating means that Roanoke County citizens who are eligible for federal flood insurance will pay the lowest possible rates available in our area. The attached ordinance, accepts the analysis, design and flood reduction recommendations contained in the Plan. It does not address, nor commit the County to any particular funding mechanism or administrative structure to fund the recommended improvements. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: 1. The staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve Second Reading of the prepared ordinance. Respectfully Submitted, Approved, TerranceLHar 'Fgton, AICP Director f Planning and Zoning Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Action Vote No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by Harrison Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) McNamara Referred Minnix to Nickens AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA BY THE ADOPTION OF THE ROANOKE VALLEY REGIONAL STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN AS PART OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHEREAS, Roanoke County and other jurisdictions within the Roanoke Valley have experienced a recurrent history of flooding of properties; and, WHEREAS, this flooding has resulted in the loss of property and the disruption of the lives of many Roanoke County citizens; and, WHEREAS, Roanoke County and other Valley jurisdictions have cooperatively joined together to fund and prepare the Roanoke Valley Regional Stormwater Management Plan (The Plan); and, WHEREAS, the Plan was prepared under the coordination of the Fifth Planning District Commission, and involved the extensive involvement of citizen and technical advisory committees; and, WHEREAS, the Plan is future oriented and addresses flooding, stormwater, and drainage issues within sixteen priority watersheds within the Roanoke Valley; and, WHEREAS, the Plan specifically provides an enhancement to the 1993 FEMA Flood Insurance Study, incorporates recommended stormwater master plans for each of the sixteen priority watersheds, contains specific recommendations for multi jurisdictional projects and policies, and contains recommended implementation strategies that if implemented, will reduce existing flooding problems and minimize future damages for many citizens within Roanoke County; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission reviewed the Plan on March 3, 1998 and after holding a public hearing, has recommended the incorporation of the Plan as part of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, first reading of this ordinance was held on March 10, 1998 and second reading was held on March 24, 1998 BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia as follows: 1. That Roanoke County, Virginia accepts the analysis, design and flood reduction recommendations contained within the Plan and appends the Comprehensive Plan of Roanoke County to include these components of the Plan; and, 2. That the Plan shall be used a general guide for implementing the recommended improvements as future funding sources are identified and funding is allocated for specific projects; and, 3. That this ordinance shall be in effect from and after March 24, 1998 PETITIONER: Planning Commission of Roanoke County Virginia CASE NUMBER: 6- 3198 Planning Commission Hearing Date: Board of Supervisors Meeting Date: A. REQUEST March 3, 1998 March 10, 1998 A Resolution Amending of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan by the Addition of the Roanoke Valley Regional Stormwater Management Plan B. CITIZEN COMMENTS Mr. Lee Eddy, 2211 Pommel Drive spoke in favor of the resolution. Mr. Eddy requested that the Commission recommend including the analysis and design recommendations of the Regional Stormwater Master plan in the Comprehensive Plan. He suggested that recommendations pertaining to financing and administrative options not be included in the Comprehensive Plan, as more regional discussions are needed on these items. Mr Eddy also advised the Commission that members of the Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission met recently to discuss identifying a continuing funding source for greenway construction. He reminded the Commission of the strong linkage between stream -side greenways and stormwater management, and suggested that once a continuing funding source for stormwater management was identified, that funding source allow the use of funds for greenway construction . Mr. Ernest Hedrick, 4338 Buck Mountain Road, spoke advising the Commission of the long term stormwater and flooding problems at his home. He asked whether the stormwater management plan will address his problems. Mr. George Simpson, Assistant Director of Engineering, advised Mr. Hedrick and the Commission that the plan looks at regional issues and makes specific recommendations for watershed improvements, but does not address property specific measures. Mr. Simpson advised Mr. Hedrick that he would work with him to look at his specific situation. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Commission thanked Mr. Simpson for working on this important project and expressed hope that discussion on implementation and financing methods would continue among the Valley's four jurisdictions. D. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Ross moved approval of the resolution appending the Roanoke Valley Regional Stormwater Management Plan to the Comprehensive Plan. AYES: Hooker, Robinson, Ross, Thomason, Witt NAYS: None E. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE • None. F. ATTACHMENTS K. Staff Report ?� Board Report Other Terrance Harringto ecretary Roanoke County Planning Commission TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Roanoke County Department of Planning Memorandum Commission Planning Terrance Director L. Harrington, AICP of Planning January 29, 1998 Addition of the Roanoke Valley Regional Stormwater Management Plan to the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan In March of 1997 the Planning Commission was presented an overview of the regional stormwater management study prepared for Roanoke County and other valley jurisdictions. The study is an analysis of regional stormwater management needs in sixteen priority water sheds that are tributaries of the Roanoke River. In addition to the analysis, the study also contains a series of alternatives and recommendations to address regional stormwater management needs. I have attached an Executive Summary of the study. The final study was completed in October of 1997. Each of the Valley's jurisdictions is currently evaluating the study. Roanoke County would like to append the study to the Comprehensive Plan so that the study and its recommendations can be used as a guide and basis for future regional stormwater management efforts. In addition, having this stormwater management plan adopted as a County planning document will allow the County to maintain our high community rating under the Federal Flood Insurance Program. Maintaining this high rating allows Roanoke County citizens lower rates on flood insurance. George Simpson, who headed up the County's study initiative will attend your worksession on February 17th, to review the study with you. I will schedule a public hearing for March 3rd, so that the Commission's recommendation on the study can be forwarded to the Board for public hearing and action on March 24. Roanoke Valley Regional Stormwater Management Plan Sponsored by: • Fifth Planning District Commission, and • City of Roanoke • City of Salem • County of Roanoke • Town of Vinton October 1997 working Together to Address the Roanoke Valley Flooding Problemat Prepared by P Dewberry&Davin in cooperation with: • CH2M Hili • T.P. Parker&Son Covering: • Back Creek Watershed Barnhardt Creek Watershed Butt Hollow Creek Watershed Carvin Creek Watershed Cole Hollow Branch Watershed Dry Branch Watershed Gish Branch Watershed Glade Creek Watershed Lick Run Watershed • Mason Creek Watershed • Mudlick Creek Watershed • Murray Run Watershed • 0re Branch Watershed • Peters Creek Watershed • Tinker Creek Watershed • Wolf Creek Watershed EXECUTIVE CUT SUMMARY This report was prepared by Dewberry & Davis under contract to the Fifth Planning District Commission (5th PDC) of the Commonwealth of Virginia. Localities participating in this study include the Cities of Roanoke and Salem, the County of Roanoke and the Town of Vinton. The Roanoke Valley Regional Stormwater Management Plan is a multi -jurisdictional effort coordinated by the 5th PDC. The project is funded by the City of Roanoke, the City of Salem, the County of Roanoke, the Town of Vinton and a stormwater mitigation grant from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The overall focus of the report is the implementation of policies and procedures for mitigation of floods in the Roanoke Valley and other components included in this study will assist the jurisdictions' decision making process in the immediate- and near -future as demographics and land uses change Some of these components include- enhancement of the 1993 FEMA Flood insurance Study, development of master plans for the individual watersheds, development of specific multi -jurisdictional projects and policies, development of implementation practices and preparation of watershed plans. Several tasks which were performed and presented to the technical advisory committee in separate reports include the following: an evaluation of stormwater ordinances and policies; development of a model stormwater management ordinance; an evaluation of maintenance practices; an evaluation of water quality in the selected watersheds including basic pollutant modeling; and an evaluation of funding and financing options for the identified projects. The study area consists of sixteen priority watersheds that are tributaries to the Roanoke River and drain a combined area of 248 square miles. The study also includes detailed hydraulic modeling of 30 streams in the 16 priority watersheds covering a length of 112 miles. The lb priority watersheds are listed below: u_ Back Creek Cole Hollow Lick Rim Ore Branch Barnhardt Creek Dry Branch Mason Creek Peters Creek Butt Hollow Creek Gish Branch Mudlick Creek Tinker Creek Carvin Creek Glade Creek Murray Run Wolf Creek Since 1877 over 17 large floods have occurred in. the Roanoke Valley with 4 of the largest in the past 20 years. In the past 20 years of active flood activity, flooding damages have been estimated exceeding $200 million with over 12,000 impacted residential structures and over 1,000 businesses. For this study the hydrology was conducted using SCS methodologies in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers HEC-1 model. The HEC-1 model was used to develop peak discharges for a range of recurrence interval events (2-, 5-, 10-, 25-, 50- and 100-year) for both existing and developed land use conditions: Existing land uses were determined primarily from aerial photography taken in March 1995. Developed land use projections for the Year 2020 were determined using zoning maps, comprehensive plans and maps of the communities in the study area. There are approximately 400 subbasins within the study area. Flood elevations for the 2-, 5-, 10-, 25-, 50-, and 100-year storm events were determined by inputting the corresponding runoff discharges computed from the HEC-1 hydrologic model into the Corps of Engineers' IBC-2 Water Surface Profile computer program. The FEMA HEC-2 models were used as a basis for the water surface profile models in this study. These models were revised to reflect the computed discharges from the HEC- 1 models, updated cross section elevations from the aerial topography and occasionally �-1 more recent bridge data. Where data was available on debris blockage this information was also incorporated into the models. To conduct the flood hazard mitigation evaluation, the flood profiles and floodplain maps were used to identify structures located in the floodplains and a determination was made as to the cause of the flooding. Possible solutions to reduce or eliminate flooding at structures were screened to determine those that would reduce the severity of flooding. Roads that were inundated by storms with a 10-year or more frequent recurrence interval were also identified. Flood hazard mitigation measures were determined for each study watershed. These measures include retrofitting existing facilities such as: the retrofit of existing lakes, ponds and road embankments, debris control and flap gates. New flood mitigation projects were also identified such as: flood control dams, levees, bridge/culvert replacement, channel widening, and new: pipes. Each mitigation measure was evaluated for effectiveness in reducing flooding and for engineering feasibility. A project rating system was developed in consultation with an appointed Citizens Advisory Committee that considered the number and type of structures relieved by the project, the estimated project cost, the design storm, the environmental impact, the potential funding sources and the perrnittability of the proposed project. Intangible factors were also identified for evaluation by the various communities. Approximately 130 projects in the 16 watersheds were identified with a total projected cost of approximately 61 million dollars. Over 30 of these projects were stormwater management ponds and over 90 involved the raising or enlarging of road crossings. Only projects with fatal flaws were eliminated. All other remaining projects without respect to ranking are included in the plan. Structures located within the 100-year floodplain were identified and categorized for different levels of f1oodproof ng. Category 1 structures are located in areas where the is greater than 8 feet and. these homes were recommended to be —' Li 100-year flood depth purchased or relocated. Category 2 structures are located in areas where the 100-year flood depth is greater than 3 feet and less than 8 feet and are recommended to be elevated, relocated or purchased. Structures located in areas where the 100--year flood depth is less than 3 feet were identified as Category 3 and were recommended to be dry floodproofed or elevated. Costs for the different levels of floodproofing are su rnma_rized in the report but were not included in the project costs included in the Watershed Plans since each structure would have to be considered on a case by case basis. Approximately 1700 homes were identified in the existing conditions 100-year floodplains and approximately 2000 homes were identified in the developed conditions 100-year floodplains in the 16 watersheds. This assumes that no additional structures will be constructed in the ultimate conditions 100-year floodplain. Of these 2000 structures, approximately 17% were identified as Category 1, approximately 42% were Category 2 and approximately 41% were Category 3. Regulatory issues were also addressed for the proposed projects. The proposed stormwater management pond sites were visited .aid National Wetlands Inventory maps were consulted to identify possible wetland issues. Issues regarding Nationwide permits issued by the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers were summarized. The watershed plans represent a holistic approach. The projects work in conjunction with one another and provide benefits to each community Of the approximately 130 projects, half are located in Roanoke County, one third are located in the City of Roanoke, 15% are located in the City of Salem and 2% are located in the Town of Vinton. This is in line with the severity of flooding problems identified. Of the 2000 floodprone structures identified, approximately 40% are located in Roanoke County, approximately 35% are located in the City of Roanoke, approximately 20% are located in the City of Salem and approximately 5% are located in the Town of Vinton. Some of the identified projects reduce or eliminate existing flooding hazards. Others will reduce the impact of development. The watershed plans provide a full list of major projects available to the local governments to alleviate flooding in the region. tangoing efforts of the Technical Advisory Committee in conjunction with the Citizens Advisory Committee and the elected boards of the participating communities will be to further characterize the proposed projects and develop funding and/or financing methods for the projects. Actions contemplated include: conducting a feasibility study and determining a rate structure for a stormwater utility fund in the City of Roanoke and Roanoke County; conducting GPS elevation certificates for structures identified in the 100-year floodplain areas; conducting benefit/cost analyses of the identified projects to determine feasibility and priority; and aggressively pursuing state and federal funding available for roadway crossing upgrades, flood hazard mitigation projects, residential elevation certificates and residential/commercial relocation and floodproofing projects. 111 JIlIItttttuttttttlttttutIuuttttltttltttttn ttttl �st1UhIOHIIIIUullli111111HLH11111111l11.11111uI! 1111111111111111ij.J i MOO n.� s ao MEI - MIN 01/11 i i Ima - - MIL NMI S EM 1/11111 11.111 1011 NMI 11101.1 IRO M▪ al Mai ■s i aa. ISM - a� Ya aa• - a a IWO BEM - a_ 0 aan O N. MEN 110 - 11/.111 L AGENDA HEM NO APPEARANCE REQITEST VPUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: t Gia 7-/, I / I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY' THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: vsEach speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. EsSpeakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME % 4 t / , e / — ADDRESS 2 7 C < . /-/ L�16/C1/1 PHONE 7/ y - fJ it 'hill/ ull i1It it in111 iu i1111111111I111111 i1i1111i11111I111 iI11 uniiiii till illl iI111IIIl i1I111IIunit 1I11I1IlIlumil if a NMI MEM N UNN 111111111 MIMS MOM 110 NMI aa. - MEI NOM Mat MIN - U MW MUM IMMO IMMIO MUM MINN a 1111/11/ c - MEM MIN - - 11111111// MUM NON a _NMI a 10/ a a awe a a Mem Pam - a Sum Iowa Nam Man IMAM MEM Mee - 1110 a NEM a Moo a a a a 1111.1 111113111 Ions mem NNW Man Win AIM - a a WPM Mom a Am. 111111.. OMR MEM - 2- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998 ORDINANCE 032498-13 AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 10-33. REAL ESTATE SERVICES., SECTION 10-34. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES. AND SECTION 10-36. PERSONAL AND BUSINESS SERVICE OCCUPATIONS., OF ARTICLE II. CLASSIFIED BUSINESS AND OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE PROVISIONS, OF CHAPTER 10, LICENSES, TO INCREASE THE GROSS RECEIPTS FROM $3,000.00 TO $5,000.00 FOR THE EXEMPTION FROM PAYMENT OF A LICENSE FEE WHEREAS, Section 10-33, "Real estate services" of the Roanoke County Business, Professional, and Occupational License (BPOL) Ordinance provides for imposition of the business license tax in the amount of $0.58 per $100.00 of gross receipts from the business during the preceding calendar year, with such services being defined in subsection (b) and specifically designated in subsection (c) of Section 10-33; and, WHEREAS, Section 10-34, "Professional services" of the BPOL Ordinance provides for imposition of the business license tax in the amount of $0.58 per $100.00 of gross receipts from the occupation during the preceding calendar year, with such services being defined in subsection (b) of Section 10-34; and, WHEREAS, Section 10-36, "Personal and Business Service Occupations" of the BPOL Ordinance provides for imposition of the business license tax in the amount of $0.36 per $100.00 of gross receipts from the occupation during the preceding calendar year, with such services being defined in subsection (b) and specifically designated in subsection (c) of Section 10-36; and, WHEREAS, these classifications include retired, part-time, or juvenile individuals, and individuals who maintain a license merely to prevent such license from lapsing; and, WHEREAS, by Ordinance #91493-8, the Board of Supervisors approved an exemption from the business license tax for individuals generating Tess than $3,000.00 in gross receipts in each of the aforesaid classifications, based upon a determination that the time and expense incurred by the Commissioner of Revenue's Office in processing licenses for such individuals is not cost effective; and, WHEREAS, upon adoption of Ordinance #062596-9 to impose a license fee (rather than a license tax) on businesses with gross receipts Tess than $100,000.00, the Board maintained the exemption through provisos that every person whose gross receipts in the preceding calendar year are less than $3,000.00 in the above -specified classifications shall pay the $50.00 license fee upon commencement of the business and initial application for a license and shall be exempt thereafter from paying a license fee or tax, as long as such person continues to qualify for the exemption and otherwise complies with the BPOL Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors deems it appropriate, in order to improve cost effectiveness and fairness in the administration of the BPOL Ordinance, to increase the gross receipts' threshold from $3,000.00 to $5,000.00 for the exemption from the license fee in the classifications of real estate services, professional services, and personal and business service occupations. WHEREAS, a first reading of this ordinance was held on March 10, 1998; and the second reading and public hearing was held on March 24, 1998. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, as follows: 2 1. That Section 10-33 Real Estate Services., Section 10-34. Professional Services. and Section 10-36 Personal and business service occupations. of Article II. Classified Business and Occupational License Provisions, of Chapter 10, LICENSES, be amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 10-33. Real estate services. (a) The annual license tax imposed hereunder for real estate services shall be in the amount of fifty-eight cents ($0.58) per one hundred dollars ($100.00) of gross receipts from the business during the preceding calendar year. Every person whose gross receipts >a< in the preceding calendar year shall be less than i�'#Ii3l��€�#�lt�lI�t�{,�Q )fictree from any real estate service shall pay the license fee of fifty dollars ($50.00) imposed in § 10-3(a) of this chapter upon commencement of the business and initial application for a license and shall thereafter be exempt from the payment of a license fee or tax, provided that such person continues to qualify for this exemption and otherwise complies with the requirements of this chapter. Sec. 10-34. Professional services. (a) The annual license tax imposed hereunder for professional services shall be in the amount of fifty-eight cents ($0.58) per one hundred dollars ($100.00) of gross receipts from the occupation during the preceding calendar year. Every person whose gross .............................................................. .............................................................. receipts in the preceding calendar year shall be less than five from any professional service shall pay the license fee of fifty dollars ($50.00) imposed in § 10-3(a) of this chapter upon 3 commencement of the business and initial application for a license and shall thereafter be exempt from the payment of a license fee or tax, provided that such person continues to qualify for this exemption and otherwise complies with the requirements of this chapter. Sec. 10-36. Personal and business service occupations. (a) The annual license tax imposed hereunder for personal or business services, and all other businesses and occupations not specifically listed or excepted in this chapter of the Roanoke County Code or the Code of Virginia, shall be in the amount of thirty-six cents ($0.36) per one hundred dollars ($100.00) of gross receipts from the occupation during the preceding calendar year. Every person whose gross receipts in the preceding OO calendar year shall be less than f�i1tila���;1��.OO . ($37008:00) from any personal or business service shall pay the license fee of fifty dollars ($50.00) imposed in § 10-3(a) of this chapter upon commencement of the business and initial application for a license and shall thereafter be exempt from the payment of a license fee or tax, provided that such person continues to qualify for this exemption and otherwise complies with the requirements of this chapter. 2. This ordinance shall be effective from and after July 1, 1998. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 4 A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Holt , Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 5 cc: File Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Circuit Court Roy B. Willett, Judge Clifford R. Weckstein, Judge Diane McQ. Strickland, Judge Richard C. Pattisall, Judge Robert P. Doherty, Jr., Judge Jonathan M. Apgar, Judge Steven A. McGraw, Clerk Juvenile Domestic Relations District Court Joseph M. Clarke, II, Judge Philip Trompeter, Judge John B. Ferguson, Judge Joseph P. Bounds, Judge Ruth P. Bates, Clerk Intake Counsellor General District Court George W. Harris, Judge William Broadhurst, Judge Vincent Lilley, Judge Julian H. Raney, Judge Jacqueline F. Ward Talevi, Judge Theresa A. Childress, Clerk Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney Magistrates Sherri Krantz/Betty Perry Main Library Richard Burch, Chief of Fire & Rescue Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke 24016 Roanoke County Law Library, Singleton Osterhoudt Roanoke County Code Book Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance O. Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Michael Lazzuri, Court Services William J. Rand, III, Director, General Services Thomas S. Haislip, Director, Parks & Recreation Elaine Carver, Director, Procurement John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue ACTION NO. ITEM NO. t't ` 21'w AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 24, 1998 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 10-33. REAL ESTATE SERVICES., SECTION 10-34. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES., AND SECTION 10-36. PERSONAL AND BUSINESS SERVICE OCCUPATIONS., OF ARTICLE II. CLASSIFIED BUSINESS AND OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE PROVISIONS, OF CHAPTER 10, LICENSES, TO INCREASE THE GROSS RECEIPTS FROM $3,000.00 TO $5,000.00 FOR THE EXEMPTION FROM PAYMENT OF A LICENSE FEE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This ordinance increases gross receipts' threshold amount from $3,000.00 to $5,000.00 for three classifications of businesses and occupations: real estate services, professional services, and personal and business service occupations. BACKGROUND: On September 14, 1993, the Board of Supervisors adopted an ordinance (Ordinance #91493-8) providing an exemption from the business license tax for individuals generating less than $3,000.00 in gross receipts in each of these three classifications. The time and expense incurred by the Commissioner of the Revenue's office in processing these licenses for such individuals was not cost effective. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Last month the Board considered and adopted amendments to the County's License ordinance. These amendments brought the County Code into conformance with the State enabling legislation. During this process the Board directed staff prepare an ordinance for its consideration increasing the threshold amount for gross receipts from $3,000.00 to $5,000.00 for the exemption from the license fee in the classifications of real estate services, professional services, and personal and business service occupations. The attached ordinance accomplishes this goal. The first reading of this ordinance is scheduled for March 10, 1998. The second reading and public hearing is scheduled for March 24, 1998. FISCAL IMPACTS The loss of revenue from this change would be $8,200.00 annually. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board favorably consider the adoption of the attached ordinance. Respectfully submitted, m0 Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Harrison Received ( ) Johnson Referred McNamara to Minnix Nickens g:\attorney\board\bpolamnd.rpt 2 - AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998 ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 10-33. REAL ESTATE SERVICES., SECTION 10-34. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES. AND SECTION 10-36. PERSONAL AND BUSINESS SERVICE OCCUPATIONS., OF ARTICLE II. CLASSIFIED BUSINESS AND OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE PROVISIONS, OF CHAPTER 10, LICENSES, TO INCREASE THE GROSS RECEIPTS FROM $3,000.00 TO $5,000.00 FOR THE EXEMPTION FROM PAYMENT OF A LICENSE FEE WHEREAS, Section 10-33, "Real estate services" of the Roanoke County Business, Professional, and Occupational License (BPOL) Ordinance provides for imposition of the business license tax in the amount of $0.58 per $100.00 of gross receipts from the business during the preceding calendar year, with such services being defined in subsection (b) and specifically designated in subsection (c) of Section 10-33; and, WHEREAS, Section 10-34, "Professional services" of the BPOL Ordinance provides for imposition of the business license tax in the amount of $0.58 per $100.00 of gross receipts from the occupation during the preceding calendar year, with such services being defined in subsection (b) of Section 10-34; and, WHEREAS, Section 10-36, "Personal and Business Service Occupations" of the BPOL Ordinance provides for imposition of the business license tax in the amount of $0.36 per $100.00 of gross receipts from the occupation during the preceding calendar year, with such services being defined in subsection (b) and specifically designated in subsection (c) of Section 10-36; and, WHEREAS, these classifications include retired, part-time, or juvenile individuals, and individuals who maintain a license merely to prevent such license from lapsing; and, WHEREAS, by Ordinance #91493-8, the Board of Supervisors approved an exemption from the business license tax for individuals generating less than $3,000.00 in gross receipts in each of the aforesaid classifications, based upon a determination that the time and expense incurred by the Commissioner of Revenue's Office in processing licenses for such individuals is not cost effective; and, WHEREAS, upon adoption of Ordinance #062596-9 to impose a license fee (rather than a license tax) on businesses with gross receipts less than $100,000.00, the Board maintained the exemption through provisos that every person whose gross receipts in the preceding calendar year are less than $3,000.00 in the above -specified classifications shall pay the $50.00 license fee upon commencement of the business and initial application for a license and shall be exempt thereafter from paying a license fee or tax, as long as such person continues to qualify for the exemption and otherwise complies with the BPOL Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors deems it appropriate, in order to improve cost effectiveness and fairness in the administration of the BPOL Ordinance, to increase the gross receipts' threshold from $3,000.00 to $5,000.00 for the exemption from the license fee in the classifications of real estate services, professional services, and personal and business service occupations. WHEREAS, a first reading of this ordinance was held on March 10, 1998; and the second reading and public hearing was held on March 24, 1998. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, as follows: 2 1. That Section 10-33 Real Estate Services., Section 10-34. Professional Services. and Section 10-36 Personal and business service occupations. of Article II. Classified Business and Occupational License Provisions, of Chapter 10, LICENSES, be amended and reenacted as follows: Sec. 10-33. Real estate services. (a) The annual license tax imposed hereunder for real estate services shall be in the amount of fifty-eight cents ($0.58) per one hundred dollars ($100.00) of gross receipts from the business during the preceding calendar year. Every person whose gross receipts in the preceding calendar year shall be less than from any real estate service shall pay the license fee of fifty dollars ($50.00) imposed in § 10-3(a) of this chapter upon commencement of the business and initial application for a license and shall thereafter be exempt from the payment of a license fee or tax, provided that such person continues to qualify for this exemption and otherwise complies with the requirements of this chapter. Sec. 10-34. Professional services. (a) The annual license tax imposed hereunder for professional services shall be in the amount of fifty-eight cents ($0.58) per one hundred dollars ($100.00) of gross receipts from the occupation during the preceding calendar year. Every person whose gross receipts in the preceding calendar year shall be less than fib:>tIna d >dt a <$13p(! `wee from any professional service shall pay the license fee of fifty dollars ($50.00) imposed in § 10-3 (a) of this chapter upon commencement of the business 3 and initial application for a license and shall thereafter be exempt from the payment of a license fee or tax, provided that such person continues to qualify for this exemption and otherwise complies with the requirements of this chapter. Sec. 10-36. Personal and business service occupations. (a) The annual license tax imposed hereunder for personal or business services, and all other businesses and occupations not specifically listed or excepted in this chapter of the Roanoke County Code or the Code of Virginia, shall be in the amount of thirty-six cents ($0.36) per one hundred dollars ($100.00) of gross receipts from the occupation during the preceding calendar year. Every person whose gross receipts in the preceding calendar year shall be less than redo oUS:. from any personal or business service shall pay the license fee of fifty dollars ($50.00) imposed in § 10-3(a) of this chapter upon commencement of the business and initial application for a license and shall thereafter be exempt from the payment of a license fee or tax, provided that such person continues to qualify for this exemption and otherwise complies with the requirements of this chapter. 2. This ordinance shall be effective from and after July 1, 1998. g:\attorney\vlh\commrev\bpol2.mar 4 U-3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998 ORDINANCE 032498-14 DECLARING A PARCEL OF REAL ESTATE TO BE SURPLUS AND ACCEPTING AN OFFER FOR THE SALE OF SAME; NAMELY THE ARLINGTON HILLS #2 WELL LOT BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property, having been made available for other public uses before permitting disposition by sale, is hereby declared to be surplus. 2. That an advertisement for bids for the sale of this surplus real estate was advertised in the Roanoke Times & World News on March 17, 1998; that notice has been mailed to adjoining property owners; and that a sign announcing the proposed sale of this surplus real estate has been posted on the property. 3. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading of this ordinance was held on March 10, 1998, and the second reading was held on March 24, 1998, concerning the disposition of the following parcel of real estate identified as follows: Arlington Hills #2 Well Lot Tax Map Parcel No. 86.12-3-16 4. That offers for said properties having been received, the offer of S. Douglas Freeman to purchase this property for the sum of Fifty Eight Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($58,500.00) is hereby accepted. 5. That the purchase price for the property will be paid upon delivery of a deed therefor and all proceeds from the sale of this real estate are to be paid into the utility capital improvements fund. 6. That the County Administrator or an Assistant County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the sale of said property, all of which will be on form approved by the County Attorney. 7. That this ordinance will be effective on and from the date of its adoption. On motion of Supervisor McNamara to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Gary Robertson, Director, Utility John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 2 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER u - a AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 24, 1998 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance declaring a parcel of real estate to be surplus and accepting an offer for the sale of same; namely the Arlington Hills #2 Well Lot COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This is the second reading of an ordinance to sell a surplus well lot, in response to the receipt of offers for same. BACKGROUND: The Board has adopted a policy for the sale or disposal of surplus real estate. Many of the parcels identified as surplus are well lots to be abandoned with the completion of the reservoir and the water transmission lines. This procedure provided for the advertisement and publication of surplus real estate, inviting bids from the public, notice to adjoining property owners, and posting a sign on the property proposed for sale. Once an offer is received, staff submits the offer to the Board of Supervisors in executive session after evaluation by the County Administrator, County Attorney and Property Manager. If the Board wishes to proceed, then the County Attorney prepares an appropriate ordinance for the first reading, which constitutes notice that a bona fide offer has been received, and that other written offers may be received until 5:00 p.m. the Friday preceding the next Board meeting. After a favorable first reading, notice will be published in the newspaper and mailed to adjoining landowners. The identity of the offeror(s) and the amount, terms or conditions of the offer(s) or bid(s) will be kept confidential until the second reading. At second reading, the Board may accept the best offer received or reject all offers. IA-3 SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The County received an offer for this surplus real estate. The parcel of real estate is identified as follows: Arlington Hills #2 Well Lot Tax Map Parcel No. 86.12-3-16 FISCAL IMPACT: Pursuant to Section 16.01 of the Roanoke County Charter, the proceeds from the sale of capital facilities, including real estate, will be paid into capital facility accounts and expended therefrom solely for the purpose of acquisition, construction, maintenance or replacement of other capital facilities. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board favorably consider the adoption of the attached ordinance. Respectfully submitted, gl‘a 'TA''llo\ -vim ,\K Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Harrison Received ( ) Johnson Referred McNamara to Minnix Nickens c:\wp51\doc\agenda\utility\arlingtn.rpt 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998 ORDINANCE DECLARING A PARCEL OF REAL ESTATE TO BE SURPLUS AND ACCEPTING AN OFFER FOR THE SALE OF SAME; NAMELY THE ARLINGTON HILLS #2 WELL LOT BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property, having been made available for other public uses before permitting disposition by sale, is hereby declared to be surplus. 2. That an advertisement for bids for the sale of this surplus real estate was advertised in the Roanoke Times & World News on March 17, 1998; that notice has been mailed to adjoining property owners; and that a sign announcing the proposed sale of this surplus real estate has been posted on the property. 3. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading of this ordinance was held on March 10, 1998, and the second reading was held on March 24, 1998, concerning the disposition of the following parcel of real estate identified as follows: Arlington Hills #2 Well Lot Tax Map Parcel No. 86.12-3-16 4. That offers for said properties having been received, the offer of to purchase this property for the sum of Dollars is hereby accepted/rejected. 5. That the purchase price for the property will be paid upon delivery of a deed therefor and all proceeds from the sale of this real estate are to be paid into the utility capital improvements fund. 6. That the County Administrator or an Assistant County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the sale of said property, all of which will be on form approved by the County Attorney. 7. That this ordinance will be effective on and from the date of its adoption. c:\wp51 \doc\agenda\utility\arlingtn.ord 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998 ORDINANCE 032498-15 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF PORTIONS OF APPROXIMATELY 17 ACRES OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED IN THE 6600 BLOCK OF MERRIMAN ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 97.01-2-10, 97.01-2-11, 97.01-2-12 AND 97.05-1-1) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS OF 1-1, C-2C AND C-2, TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1, FOR PARKS AND RECREATIONAL AREAS, UPON THE APPLICATION OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 24, 1998, and the second reading and public hearing was held on March 24, 1998; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 3, 1998; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of portions of real estate containing 17 acres, as described herein, and located in the 6600 block of Merriman Road (Tax Map Numbers 97.01-2-10, 97.01-2-11, 97.01-2-12 AND 97.05-1-1) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classifications of 1-1, C-2C and C-2, to the zoning classification of R-1, in order to develop a public park and recreational area. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Commencing at a point on the westerly right-of-way line of Merriman Road (Virginia Secondary Route #613) said point being referenced as comer 1 on the plat showing "Rezoning Exhibit of Tract I (16.784 AC.), Prepared for The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Cave Spring Magisterial District, Roanoke County, Virginia" prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C., dated February 26, 1998, and also being the POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein described tract; Thence with the westerly right-of-way line of Merriman Road (Virginia Secondary Route #613) along the arc of a curve to the right 160.44 feet, said curve having a radius of 547.96 feet, an included angle of 16°46'33", and a chord bearing S 8°32'10" E, 159.87 feet to a point, corner 2; Thence leaving the westerly right-of-way line of Merriman Road (Virginia Secondary Route #613) and with eleven (11) proposed new division lines the following courses and distances; along the arc of a curve to the left 66.02 feet, said curve having a radius of 35.00 feet, an included angle of 108°04'36", and a chord bearing N 54°11'12" W, 56.66 feet to a point, corner 3; Thence S 71 °46'30" W, 7.12 feet to a point, corner 4; Thence along the arc of a curve to the left 88.36 feet, said curve having a radius of 225.00 feet, an included angle of 22°30'00", and a chord bearing S 60°31'30" W, 87.79 feet to a point, corner 5; Thence S 49°16'30" W, 139.19 feet to a point, corner 6; Thence along the arc of a curve to the right 166.90 feet, said curve having a radius of 425.00 feet, an included angle of 22°30'00", and a chord bearing S 60°31'30" W, 165.83 feet to a point, corner 7; Thence S 71 °46'30" W, 589.47 feet to a point, corner 8; Thence S 29°33'59" E, 302.78 feet to a point, corner 9; Thence S 14°38'21" E, 288.15 feet to a point, corner 10; Thence S 41 °41'33" W, 48.04 feet to a point, corner 11; Thence S 1 ° 12'22" W, 109.54 feet to a point, corner 12; Thence S 2° 13'43" E, 162.31 feet to a point, corner 13; Thence S 14°01'56" W, 109.58 feet to a point on an existing property line, corner 14; Thence with existing property lines the following six (6) courses and distances; S 77°03'00" W, 312.24 feet to a point, corner 15; Thence N 40°07'00" W, 603.30 feet to a point, corner 16; Thence N 25°27'00" W, 425.40 feet to a point, corner 17; Thence N 71 °46'30" E, 1,274.62 feet to a point, corner 18; Thence N 17°38'36" W, 169.42 feet to a point, corner 19; Thence N 72°21'24" E, 486.85 feet to a point, corner 1, the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 16.784 acres, more or less. 2 6. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Holfon, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 3 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING NORTH KUANUKL WONY 6U5 - FARO & REL I-1 TO R-1 P/0 97.01-2-10, 11, 12 PETITIONER: ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS (PARKS & RECREATION) CASE NUMBER: 2-3/98 Planning Commission Hearing Date: Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: March 3, 1998 March 24, 1998 A. REQUEST Petition of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to rezone portions of approximately 17 acres from 1-1, C-2C, and C-2 to R-1 for public parks and recreational areas, located in the 6600 block of Merriman Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Commission asked for clarification of landscape screening requirements where activity areas and/or lighted fields adjoin residential use types. Mr. Thomason asked if the concept plan was Scheme A, or Scheme B in the Master Plan for Southwest District Park. He added that as a member of the School Board's Blue Ribbon Committee, his interest is to make sure this park development did not conflict with plans for a stadium/school sports complex on the Taylor tract. Pete Haislip, Director of Parks and Recreation pointed out that Scheme B of the Master Plan is preferred, which leaves the Taylor tract open for the sports complex development. Also, Scheme B provides a 200- space parking lot within walking distance of the Taylor tract, and could be used for sporting events. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS None. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Witt moved to recommend approval of the petition. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Hooker, Robinson, Ross, Thomason, Witt NAYS: None ABSTAIN: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report Other Terrance Harri on, Se etary Roanoke Co ty Planning Commission STAFF REPORT PETITIONER: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors PREPARED BY: David Holladay CASE NUMBER: 2-3/98 DATE: 3/3/98 PART I A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This petition is an unconditional request to rezone approximately 17 acres from I1, C2C and C2 to R1 in order to develop a public park and recreational area. The proposed development of the park is guided by the Master Plan for the Southwest District Park, Roanoke County. The proposal conforms with the policies and guidelines of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. B. DESCRIPTION The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors petitions to rezone approximately 17 acres from I1, C2C, and C2 to R1 in order to develop a public park and recreational area. The site lies between two existing park facilities, the Merriman Road Soccer Complex, and Starkey Park. Rezoning and subsequent development of this site would begin implementation of the Master Plan for the Southwest District Park. The site is in the 6600 Block of Merriman Road, in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. • C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS • Public Parks and Recreational Areas are allowed in all zoning districts except I1 and I2. Use and design standards for public parks and recreational areas require that any outdoor activity area, ball field or court, or stadium which adjoins a residential use type shall be landscaped with one row of small evergreen trees in accordance with Section 30-92 along the property line adjoining the residential use type. Where nighttime lighting of such areas is proposed, large evergreen trees shall be required. Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) will require a commercial entrance permit for the new entrance proposed at the intersection of Starkey Road and Merriman Road. PART II A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Background - Development of the site on this petition is a step toward implementing the Master Plan for the Southwest District Park. From April through September of 1997, a citizens committee worked with Parks and Recreation staff and Resource Planners, Inc., a consultant group, to develop a master plan for a new district park in southwest Roanoke County. This plan was presented to the Board of Supervisors in a work session on September 23, 1997. For details of the plan, refer to the Master Plan Report, Southwest District Park, Roanoke County, Virginia, September 23, 1997 developed by Resource Planners, Inc.. The development of the site involves an exchange of property between the owners of Plastics One, the Roanoke County School Board, and the Board of Supervisors. Plastics One owns two tracts identified as tax parcels #97.01-2-10, and #97.01-2-12. The School Board owns tax parcel #97.01-2-11, which lies between the two Plastics One properties. All three properties have frontage on Merriman Road on their eastern side, and are bordered by Back Creek on their western side. The frontage property is suitable for commercial and industrial development, while the western portions of the properties lie in the Back Creek floodplain. As a result of the land exchange, Plastics One will own the developable frontage portions of the property, and the Board of Supervisors will own the floodplain areas for park development. Also included in this rezoning petition is a 1.83 acre tract at 6461 Merriman Road, recently purchased by the Board of Supervisors, plus a 50 foot wide strip of property, currently owned by Plastics One, connecting to and providing access to the proposed park. Topography/Vegetation - The topography of the site is flat, with a majority of the area within the Back Creek floodplain and floodway. Areas in the petition which are not within the floodplain include the 1.83 acre tract at 6461 Merriman Road, and a portion of the proposed access road. Vegetation is mostly open meadows, with clusters of mature wooded areas. The remains of the old Roanoke Raceway/Starkey Racetrack are visible in the floodplain area behind Plastics One. Surrounding Neighborhood - Property to the north is zoned R1, and includes the facilities at Starkey Park, and a 4 acre tract with a single family residence. Frontage property along Merriman Road, to the north is zoned C2, and contains a single family residence. To the east, across Merriman Road, property is zoned I1, and I2, with several industrial uses. Following the land exchange, adjoining property to the east will be owned by Plastics One, and is zoned C2C and I1. The property which is zoned C2C was rezoned by the owners of Plastics One in 1988 for development of a supermarket. Property to the south is zoned Il, with a Special Use Permit for development of the Merriman Road Soccer Complex. A 14.32 acre tract to the west is zoned AR, with one single family residence. The Blue Ridge Parkway lies nearby to the south and southwest. B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Layout/Architecture - In the Master Plan for the Southwest District Park, two alternative plans were developed, with "Scheme B" being the preferred alternative. The Scheme B plan is attached to the rezoning application. Also attached is an enlargement of the area on the petition for rezoning, with the perimeter of the 17 acres highlighted by a bold line. A new entrance is proposed which would align with the existing intersection of Starkey Road and Merriman Road. The entrance is shown through property which the Board of Supervisors purchased in the Fall of 1997. The existing single family residence would be used as a park office. The access road continues through a 50 foot wide strip of property to a proposed 200 space parking lot. A 250-300 seat amphitheater with permanent stage is proposed. A softball field, baseball field, and multi -purpose field would be developed. Each of the three fields would be lighted. Also included in the plans are a playground, restroom/concession building, volleyball courts and horseshoe pits. In addition to the active recreation facilities, the northwest corner of the site would remain as open space for passive recreation, picnic shelters, and special events. A walking and jogging trail is proposed as part of a network of trails throughout the entire district park. The trail along Back Creek would serve as a section of the Roanoke Valley Greenway system. Access/Traffic Circulation - Access to the site will be via a new entrance to be aligned with the intersection of Starkey Road and Merriman Road. New traffic to the site will be seasonal, affected by programs and events taking place at the park, and similar to existing patterns around Starkey Park and the Merriman Road Soccer Complex. 1994 VDOT traffic counts in the vicinity are as follows: Road Rt 613, Merriman Rd Rt 904, Starkey Rd from Rt. 615, Starlight Ln Rt 904, Starkey Rd Rt 613, Merriman Rd to Rt. 904, Starkey Rd Rt 1723, Commonwealth Dr Rt 632, Crescent Blvd vehicles per day 2,801 5,545 3,936 Fire & Rescue/Utilities - Fire and rescue service will continue as currently provided. Public water and sanitary sewer services are available to the site. Blue Ridge Parkway - As mentioned above, the Blue Ridge Parkway lies nearby to the south and southwest of the site. The proposed park development is well screened from views along the Parkway by existing topography and vegetation. A southbound traveler on the parkway will see brief views to the north while approaching and crossing the Back Creek bridge. In this view, one briefly sees parts of the Merriman Soccer Complex, the south side of Plastics One, buildings at the intersection of Starkey Road and Merriman Road, and residential areas in the distance. A northbound traveler will likely not have the same view as the parkway curves to the northeast. • C. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The proposal conforms with the policies and guidelines -of the Comprehensive Plan. A majority of the site is designated Surface Water and Flood Hazard on the Future Land Use Map of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. Applicable guidelines to protect floodplains include: -Restrict or prohibit uses which are dangerous to health, safety or property in times of flood or cause increased flood heights or velocities. -These areas serve an esthetic purpose and are ideal for use as parks and open space. The frontage area where the new access road is proposed, which is outside the floodplain limits, is designated Transition in the Future Land Use Guide of the Comprehensive Plan. The transition designation delineates highway frontage and buffer parcels where orderly land development is encouraged. Parks are listed as desirable land use types in the transition areas. D. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The site lies within the Floodplain Overlay District of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. The basis for the delineation of these areas is the Flood Insurance Study for Roanoke County prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, dated October 15, 1993, as amended. Permitted uses within the floodway include Public Parks and Recreational Areas. • PART III iA. STAFF CONCLUSIONS This petition represents a significant opportunity to set aside 17 acres of creekside land for a public park, and to link several existing parks into a contiguous facility. Park and recreation areas are an ideal use of the Back Creek floodplain. The exchange of property between Plastics One, the Roanoke County School Board, and the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors enhances the development potential of valuable commercial and industrial property. These are only the immediate benefits. The long term benefits of this action will multiply in the future. Staff recommends approval of the petition. • • COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 5204 Bernard Dr.•„ P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 ( 540' 772-2068 FAX (540) 772-2108 For staff use only {✓k date received:' received by: application fee: PCIBZA date: 3/.7/�� placards issued: 4/e5 -z.fi?f9e? Boy date: 3 2_-//'?8 Case Number: 2_ - / ' Check type of application filed (check all that apply): C10 REZONING ■ SPECIAL USE MI VARIANCE Applicant's name: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Phone:772-2005 Address: P.O. Box 29800, Roanoke, VA 24018 Zip Code: Owner's name: Charles R. & Curtis L. Lemon Roanoke Co School Board Phone: Address: 1423 West Dr 5937 Cove Rd Zip Code: Roanoke, VA 24015 Roanoke, VA 24019 Location of property: 6600 Block Merriman Road Tax Map Number:97.01-2-10,11,12, 97.05-1-1 Magisterial District: Cave Spring Community Planning Area: Cave Spring Size of parcel (s): 16.957 acres Existing Zoning: I-1, C2C, C2 Existing Land Use: Vacant, Single Family Residence sq.ft. 7 Proposed Zoning: R-1, Residential Proposed Land Use: Public Parks and Recreational Areas For Staff Use Only Use Type: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES X NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES NO parcel IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO I' '`:'` '':`;IIII'•''':'I i is1 _ I i':I I'`:`'• `:i`':`:i i°'?i' s ` I 'II Variance of Sectionfs) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. R/5 V Consultation Application Justification Ft/3 V 8 1 /2" x 1 1" concept plan Metes and bounds description Water and sewer application R!5 V ? ¢ H Application fee Proffers, if applicable Adjoining property owners l hereby certify that / am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner. Owner's Signature: VINIDNIA •A1Nf1OD DIONVO21 )1 JVd 1JR6SIa 1S3MH1flOS 8 3W3HDS NV1d 331SVW L969-I9Z (VOID SUEZ'VA 'ONOWHORI'311N3AV 3QISELLNON 111E 'DNI S213NNVld 3»21f1OS321 NDIS3a NOIIV311J3N • 3Nf1.03111-INV k ' DNIN33NI'_1N3 • 3Nf1.0311HJNV 3dY0SONY1 • • REVISIONS u;ii: �s 2 1 J „i m a F o O ° W G • VOLLEYBALL/HORSESHOESi``` \BACK WAY FAMILY GAMES •,GREEN ,'' � PICNIC AREAS \ I : \ I / �\ \ _` i 1 , -\ PLAYGROUND1 / SPECIAL EVENTS \ \ AREA -G RESTROOM --\ ERRJMAN ROAD eTBALL BASEBALL / PARKING (200)- I TRAIL STREAM CROSSING V•� AMPHITHEATER TRAIL 7699 ,A R 'PlkD no 057 CW► S it"gil41 VI S�t° R 13 17.91 M R.C.@8 • AR DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 5.1 564 Ac } 8 Anne No11.nd p� CJ3 ti NORTH ROANUKE COUNTY KU5 - NARKS & REA, I-1 TO R-1 P/0 97.01-2-10, 11, 12 35.6 5.3 72 nk La' 17 40.12 Ac e 4.0 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF PORTIONS OF APPROXIMATELY 17 ACRES OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED IN THE 6600 BLOCK OF MERRIMAN ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 97.01-2-10, 97.01-2-11, 97.01-2-12 AND 97.05-1-1) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS OF I-1, C-2C AND C-2, TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1, FOR PARKS AND RECREATIONAL AREAS, UPON THE APPLICATION OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 24, 1998, and the second reading and public hearing was held on March 24, 1998; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 3, 1998; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of portions of real estate containing 17 acres, as described herein, and located in the 6600 block of Merriman Road (Tax Map Numbers 97.01-2-10, 97.01-2-11, 97.01-2-12 AND 97.05-1-1) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classifications of I-1, C-2C and C-2, to the zoning classification of R-1, in order to develop a public park and recreational area. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. Li 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Commencing at a point on the westerly right-of-way line of Merriman Road (Virginia Secondary Route #613) said point being referenced as corner 1 on the plat showing "Rezoning Exhibit of Tract I (16.784 AC.), Prepared for The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Cave Spring Magisterial District, Roanoke County, Virginia" prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C., dated February 26, 1998, and also being the POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein described tract; Thence with the westerly right-of-way line of Merriman Road (Virginia Secondary Route #613) along the arc of a curve to the right 160.44 feet, said curve having a radius of 547.96 feet, an included angle of 16°46'33", and a chord bearing S 8°32'10" E, 159.87 feet to a point, corner 2; Thence leaving the westerly right-of-way line of Merriman Road (Virginia Secondary Route #613) and with eleven (11) proposed new division lines the following courses and distances; along the arc of a curve to the left 66.02 feet, said curve having a radius of 35.00 feet, an included angle of 108°04'36", and a chord bearing N 54°11'12" W, 56.66 feet to a point, corner 3; Thence S 71°46'30" W, 7.12 feet to a point, corner 4; Thence along the arc of a curve to the left 88.36 feet, said curve having a radius of 225.00 feet, an included angle of 22°30'00", and a chord bearing S 60°31'30" W, 87.79 feet to a point, corner 5; Thence S 49°16'30" W, 139.19 feet to a point, corner 6; Thence along the arc of a curve to the right 166.90 feet, said curve having a radius of 425.00 feet, an included angle of 22°30'00", and a chord bearing S 60°31'30" W, 165.83 feet to a point, corner 7; Thence S 71°46'30" W, 589.47 feet to a point, corner 8; Thence S 29°33'59" E, 302.78 feet to a point, corner 9; Thence S 14°38'21" E, 288.15 feet to a point, corner 10; Thence S 41°41'33" W, 48.04 feet to a point, corner 11; Thence S 1°12'22" W, 109.54 feet to a point, corner 12; Thence S 2° 13'43" E, 162.31 feet to a point, corner 13; Thence S 14°01'56" W, 109.58 feet to a point on an existing property line, corner 14; Thence with existing property lines the following six (6) courses and distances; S 77°03'00" W, 312.24 feet to a point, corner 15; Thence N 40°07'00" W, 603.30 feet to a point, corner 16; Thence N 25°27'00" W, 425.40 feet to a point, corner 17; Thence N 71°46'30" E, 1,274.62 feet to a point, corner 18; Thence N 17°38'36" W, 169.42 feet to a point, corner 19; Thence N 72°21'24" E, 486.85 feet to a point, corner 1, the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 16.784 acres, more or less. 2 6. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. g:\attorney\board\merriman.ord 3 LA 5 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998 ORDINANCE 032498-15 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF 17 ACRES OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED IN THE 6600 BLOCK OF MERRIMAN ROAD (PORTIONS OF TAX MAP NO. 97.01-2-10, 97.01-2-11, 97.01-2-12 AND 97.05-1-1) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS OF 1-1, C-2C AND C-2, TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1, FOR PARKS AND RECREATIONAL AREAS, UPON THE APPLICATION OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 24, 1998, and the second reading and public hearing was held on March 24, 1998; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 3, 1998; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of real estate containing 17 acres, as described herein, and located in the 6600 block of Merriman Road (Portions of Tax Map Numbers 97.01-2-10, 97.01-2-11, 97.01-2-12 AND 97.05-1-1) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classifications of 1-1, C-2C and C-2, to the zoning classification of R-1, in order to develop a public park and recreational area. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Commencing at a point on the westerly right-of-way line of Merriman Road (Virginia Secondary Route #613) said point being referenced as comer 1 on the plat showing "Rezoning Exhibit of Tract I (16.784 AC.), Prepared for The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Cave Spring Magisterial District, Roanoke County, Virginia" prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C., dated February 26, 1998, and also being the POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein described tract; Thence with the westerly right-of-way line of Merriman Road (Virginia Secondary Route #613) along the arc of a curve to the right 160.44 feet, said curve having a radius of 547.96 feet, an included angle of 16°46'33", and a chord bearing S 8°32'10" E, 159.87 feet to a point, corner 2; Thence leaving the westerly right-of-way line of Merriman Road (Virginia Secondary Route #613) and with eleven (11) proposed new division lines the following courses and distances; along the arc of a curve to the left 66.02 feet, said curve having a radius of 35.00 feet, an included angle of 108°04'36", and a chord bearing N 54°11'12" W, 56.66 feet to a point, corner 3; Thence S 71 °46'30" W, 7.12 feet to a point, corner 4; Thence along the arc of a curve to the left 88.36 feet, said curve having a radius of 225.00 feet, an included angle of 22°30'00", and a chord bearing S 60°31'30" W, 87.79 feet to a point, corner 5; Thence S 49°16'30" W, 139.19 feet to a point, corner 6; Thence along the arc of a curve to the right 166.90 feet, said curve having a radius of 425.00 feet, an included angle of 22°30'00", and a chord bearing S 60°31'30" W, 165.83 feet to a point, corner 7; Thence S 71 °46'30" W, 589.47 feet to a point, corner 8; Thence S 29°33'59" E, 302.78 feet to a point, corner 9; Thence S 14°38'21" E, 288.15 feet to a point, corner 10; Thence S 41 °41'33" W, 48.04 feet to a point, corner 11; Thence S 1 ° 12'22" W, 109.54 feet to a point, corner 12; Thence S 2° 13'43" E, 162.31 feet to a point, corner 13; Thence S 14°01'56" W, 109.58 feet to a point on an existing property line, corner 14; Thence with existing property lines the following six (6) courses and distances; S 77°03'00" W, 312.24 feet to a point, corner 15; Thence N 40°07'00" W, 603.30 feet to a point, corner 16; Thence N 25°27'00" W, 425.40 feet to a point, corner 17; Thence N 71 °46'30" E, 1,274.62 feet to a point, corner 18; Thence N 17°38'36" W, 169.42 feet to a point, corner 19; Thence N 72°21'24" E, 486.85 feet to a point, corner 1, the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 16.784 acres, more or less. 2 6. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. HolYon, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998 P2.i�/�5 of ORDINANCE 032498-15 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIF ATION OF 17 ACRES OF R AL ESTATE LOCATED IN THE 6600 BLOCK OF MERRIMAN ROAD ( AX MAP NO. 97.01-2-10, 97.01-2-11, 97.01-2-12 AND 97.05-1-1) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS OF 1-1, C-2C AND C-2, TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1, FOR PARKS AND RECREATIONAL AREAS, UPON THE APPLICATION OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 24, 1998, and the second reading and public hearing was held on March 24, 1998; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 3, 1998; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification ig-port ns of real estate containing 17 acres, �porgy ins c-4 as described herein, and located in the 6600 block of Merriman Road (Tax Map Numbers 97.01-2-10, 97.01-2-11, 97.01-2-12 AND 97.05-1-1) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classifications of 1-1, C-2C and C-2, to the zoning classification of R-1, in order to develop a public park and recreational area. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. April 7, 1998 NOTE TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Terry Harrington Arnold Covey, John Birckheard Paul Mahoney Brenda J. Holton ORDINANCE 032498-15 Audrey Bower called this morning to say that this ordinance should be changed as follows: ORDINANCE 032498-15 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF -PORTIONS -OF -APPROXIMATELY 17 ACRES OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED IN THE 6600 BLOCK OF MERRIMAN ROAD (PORTIONS TAX MAP NO. 97.01-2-10, 97.01-2-11, 97.01-2-12 AND 97.05-1-1) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS OF 1-1, C-2C AND C-2, TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1, FOR PARKS AND RECREATIONAL AREAS, UPON THE APPLICATION OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Paragraph #1 has also been revised to reflect the same changes as above. If you have any questions, pleae let me know. Attachment PETITIONER: ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD CASE NUMBER: 3-3/98 Planning Commission Hearing Date: Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: March 3, 1998 March 24, 1998 A. REQUEST Petition of the Roanoke County School Board for a Special Use Permit to allow the construction of a new elementary school, located at 5437 Crumpacker Drive, Hollins Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Commission inquired about the large paved area. The architect said that it is needed for tractor trailers to back up safely. Other comments include: students and visitors will be monitored by way of main entrance at the principal's office; at the community meeting, the residents asked that a common walking trail be constructed. In response to the Commission, Mr. Harrington said a condition for access easement was recommended to ensure adequate site distance per VDOT requirements. D. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS None. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Ross moved to recommend approval of the request with no condition. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Hooker, Robinson, Ross, Thomason, Witt NAYS: None ABSTAIN: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report _ Other Terrance Harri on, S etary Roanoke C my Planning Commission STAFF REPORT PETITIONER: Roanoke Co. School Board PREPARED BY: John Murphy CASE NUMBER: 3-3/98 DATE: 3/3/98 PART I A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This is a request for a special use permit to construct a new Roanoke County Elementary School. This request is consistent with the Development land use designation of the Roanoke County Comprehensive plan. B. DESCRIPTION This request is to build a 57,500 square foot Bonsack Area Elementary School serving students in grades K through five that reside in the Route 460 East Corridor. This proposed construction is for classrooms, office space, multipurpose rooms, and gymnasium. The surrounding grounds would include parking and outdoor recreation facilities, including a field games area, surrounded by a track. The footprint of the proposed school facility reserves an area west of the building for future expansion. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Site plan review is required. There is an additional Use and Design standard that applies to this request. The general standard requires the outdoor activity area, the track and field games area, to be landscaped with one row of small evergreen trees along the property line adjoining a residential use type. This area is located at the northwest point of the property. Staff will insure that this standard is met during site plan review. PART II A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Location - The site is located off of Crumpacker Drive, State Route 781, in the Hollins Magisterial District. TopographyNegetation - The site has a gradual northwest to southeast slope with a plateau generally at the center of the property, which is the actual site of the school building. Moderate grading of the site is anticipated, pending final engineering plan review. Surrounding Neighborhood - The adjoining properties on the east and west reflects a split zoning of R-3 and R-1, with single family use. The property immediately to the north is zoned R-2, with single family use. The Bonsack Park is located immediately south of the proposed school, on the same property. The park was developed in early 1994 and contains a gravel parking lot surrounded by a one-story picnic shelter, jungle -gym equipment, a baseball diamond and significant open space. The proposed school will have no adverse impact on the park. B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Layout/Architecture - The proposed school will be a 57,500 square feet, one story facility, which will be built in pods. Each pod will house two school grade levels. To the north and northwest of the proposed structure is the recreation area including a field game area, track and hard surfaced area for sporting activities. Sixty parking spaces, including handicap spaces, will be provided on the east side of the building. There is a student drop off location between the parking lot and the school. Immediately southeast of the main school entrance will be the bus loop for loading and unloading of the students. The access road serving the school will be constructed to allow for shoulder parking. This additional parking could be used for overflow parking associated with community or school related functions. To the west of the proposed school building is a space reserved for a future pod addition, as the student population increases. The facility is slated to initially house 300 students, with the capability of expansion to serve a total of 600 students. Access - The access is from a road to be constructed connecting to Crumpacker Drive east of Bonsack Park in the vicinity of Winesap Drive. Crumpacker Drive is a collector street between Cloverdale Road, State Route 604, and the residential streets of the Orchards Subdivision. Fralin & Waldron owns a strip of land between the school board property and Crumpacker Drive. County staff is currently working with representatives of Fralin & Waldron to acquire an access easement across their property to intersect with Crumpacker Drive at the intersection of Winesap Drive. This alignment, required by VDOT, would insure adequate sight distance for all traffic at this intersection. Traffic Generation/Circulation - The most recent VDOT traffic study report is from 1994. The traffic study on Crumpacker Drive is in three sections. The first study measured 215 vehicles per day from the dead end of Crumpacker Drive to Winesap Drive. Between Winesap Drive and Appletree Drive reflected 328 vehicles per day. The largest section of Crumpacker Drive from Appletree Drive to Cloverdale Road, which includes the previous two traffic study sections shows 725 vehicles per day. The Roanoke County School Board only expects five school buses to serve the facility. Of those five buses, several would provide pick up and drop off service to the students living in the Roanoke County subdivisions immediately surrounding the school. The school system estimates no more than 25 part time and full time employees will staff the facility. Those staff would have staggered work hours thus creating minimal traffic impact. The two routine peak times for vehicular traffic would be just prior to the beginning of school classes and at the end of the school day. The trend is for more parents to transport their children to and from school at the elementary school level than at a high school level. Fire Rescue/Utilities - The area is served by water from the Read Mountain Water Company. Sanitary sewer service currently serves the area, provided by Roanoke County. Fire and Rescue services will not be affected. Community Meeting - On February 11, 1998 a community meeting was held at the Bonsack United Methodist Church to present plans to the public for the proposed school. Representatives from the School Board and their architectural and engineering firms were available to address concerns from the community. Some of the issues voiced by the participants included increased traffic, the need for sufficient parking, the number of school buses, the route the school buses will take to access the school, the number of students, future school expansion and site development questions. C. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This request conforms with the Development land use designation of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. Policy D-7 encourages "necessary institutional support uses" such as schools, parks, and recreational facilities. D. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD Educational facilities are allowed by special use permit in the R-3 zoning districts. There is one Use and Design Standard that applies to this request. The general standard requires the outdoor activity area to be landscaped with one row of small evergreen trees along the property line adjoining a residential use type. PART IH STAFF CONCLUSIONS This request conforms with both the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed development is necessary to meet the current and future needs of the public school system. Staff does not anticipate any negative impacts from this request. Staff recommends a condition that the county acquire an adequate access easement across Fralin & Waldron's property from the school property to Crumpacker Drive at the Winesap Drive intersection to insure proper sight distance. PREPARED BY: JOHN MURPHY DATE MARCH 3, 1998 COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 5204 Bernard Dr.•,. P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 ( 540' 772-2068 FAX (540) 772-2108 For staff use only dat- r- G received b • i applicati•nfee: PC/BZ • e , placardsisue•: Q03 a2(t$ iE"Al BOS d-te• Case Number: 4or r,i 0 Check type of application filed (check all that apply): p SPECIAL USE • REZONING = VARIANCE Applicant's name: Roanoke County School Board Phone: 562-3700 Address: 5937 Cove Road Roanoke, Virginia 24019 Zip Code: Owner's name: Roanoke County School Board Phone: 562-3700 Address: Zip Code: 5937 Cove Road Roanoke, Virginia 24019 Location of property: 5437 Crumpacker Dr,, Tax Map Number: 40001-1-4.1 Magisterial District: Hollins Community Planning Area: Bonsack Size of parcel (s): 19.6 acres Existing Zoning: • Existing Land Use: R-3 sq.ft. Proposed Zoning: R-3 Special Use Permit Proposed Land Use: Educational Facility - For Staff Use Only Use Type: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, YES NO IF NO,,A VARIANCE and frontage requirements of the requested district? IS REQUIRED FIRST. requested Use Type? YES NO Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. rvs V Consultation Application Justification PIS V l' iri0 8 1 /2" x 1 1" concept plan Metes and bounds description Water and sewer application ars V Application fee Proffers, if applicable Adjoining property owners / hereby certify that l am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner. Owner's Signature: ** E0 ' 30dd 7d101 ** O CV z O i- 0 Z t LJ D o V) 0 AS SHOWN z < U CC U G ASSOCIATES. O ao en EO/E0'd 80TEELLOtST 01 GELS Egg 0PS '00SSd GNU NOS'd GNd ad ES:01: 86, 6T Had Post-Ir Fax Note 7671 Date pages, [ To Jo1.4 is mu Rr44 y From EV M U 1.R.'EAl4� j Co./Dept Co. Phone* Phone* - Fax* s40... m.,11oh Fax* 12t SA A FIFTH GRADE STORAGE GIRLS ,OURTH GRADE DRY STORAGE I. OUTDOO R STORAGE rENANCE KITCHEN - 1 OFFICE SERVING u iq OPEN ■( CLASSROOM (5th) ,01..RTH - FOURTH GRADE .,'f GRADE u RESOURCE • RESOURCE (FUTURE tmt) (FUTURE 'MU CYMMISIUM () C i PL ATFORN COMMONS/ DINING MEDIA CENTER PTO TORAIE DISTRIBUTION OFFICE WORKROOM RESOURCE LAB (FUTURE TOILETS! 1 I II r_ J \ — — — — L ._t i I -'I ICJ L—L II i 1 (FUTURE K) 1 I II II (FUTURE K) I 1 I Jl— 1 I (FUTURE td) WORK ROOM SMALL GROUP OFFICE TESTING (,ENERAL OFFICE COMPUTER LAB (FUTURE K) 1 LOBBY RESOURCE • RESOURCE o/ 7 2' FIRST GRADE (2nd) F.LECI T Au • FIRST GRWJF rl. (2nd1 ' v SECOND GRAD i SECOND GRAD (Ord) nee K.I.1y Women ConnIr YoLone. Canon, r 4.1 ° `°0 } r j/ `y-`-st/ /Zentagaits• 1*►ay 0,1111111100W Si. 14ss 40.09 ESN Map 40.09 M•Ioo' .. S.. Map 4409 M• 10d 4 /07.82 Ac(DI 90.48 de (CI S.. Man 40.10 I% IOU DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD SPECIAL USE PERMIT TAX MAP # 40.01-1-4.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998 ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO THE SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, LOCATED AT 5437 CRUMPACKER DRIVE (TAX PARCEL 40.01-1-4.1), HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, the School Board of Roanoke County, Virginia, has filed a petition to allow the construction of a new elementary school at 5437 Crumpacker Drive, in the Hollins Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 3, 1998; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on February 24, 1998; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on March 24, 1998; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to allow the construction of a new elementary school located at 5437 Crumpacker Drive in the Hollins Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.2-2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. 2. That the Board hereby grants a Special Use Permit to the School Board of Roanoke County, Virginia, to allow the construction of a new elementary school located at 5437 Crumpacker Drive in the Hollins Magisterial District. 3. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. �\attomey\board\crumpact.ord 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998 ORDINANCE 032498-17 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 9.77 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT THE SOUTH SIDE OF WOOD HAVEN ROAD APPROXIMATELY .05 MILE EAST OF ITS INTERSECTION WITH GREEN RIDGE ROAD (TAX MAP NOS. 37.05-1-1 AND 37.05-1-2) IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1, CONDITIONAL, TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1, UPON THE APPLICATION OF GRAHAM- THOMAS CORPORATION WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 24, 1998, and the second reading and public hearing was held on March 24, 1998; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 3, 1998; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 9.77 acres, as described herein, and located at the south side of Wood Haven Road approximately 0.5 mile east of its intersection with Green Ridge Road (Tax Map Numbers 37.05-1-1 and 37.05-1-2) in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-1, Conditional, to the zoning classification of R-1, Low Density Residential District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Graham -Thomas Corporation. 3. That in 1988 rezoning of this property the owner of the property voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, accepted and the Petitioner/Owner is now requesting be removed: {2) Streets will be developed in accordance with state standards and release- 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the southerly right-of-way of Wood Haven Road (Virginia Secondary Route 628) being a common corner of the property of Minnie G. Lewis and Stafford Lewis, as recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 589, page 196, the northwesterly corner of the point of Beginning in the herein -described tract; thence leaving the aforesaid southerly right-of-way of Wood Haven Road (Virginia Secondary Route 628) with the common line of the aforesaid Lewis property (DB 589, page 196) and the herein -described tract, S. 48° 42' 49" E. passing the common corner of the aforesaid Lewis property (DB 589, page 196) and the property of Ebenezer Baptist Church as recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in DB 1125, page 664 and passing the a common corner of the aforesaid Ebenezer Baptist Church Property (DB 1125, page 664) and the property of Roy E. Lewis and Christine E. Lewis, DB 1120, page 161, in all a total distance of 888.35' feet to an existing set stone; said point being a common corner of Roanoke County School Board as recorded in DB 597, page 112 and the northeasterly corner of the herein -described tract and on the southerly line of the aforesaid Roy E. Lewis 2 property (DB 1120, page 161); thence leaving the property of the aforesaid Roy E. Lewis (DB 1120, page 161) and with the common line of the aforesaid Roanoke County School Board (DB 597, page 112) and herein -described tract, S. 37°59' 18" W. a distance of 244.27 feet to an existing set stone, said point being the southeasterly corner of the herein -described tract; thence continuing with a common line for the aforesaid Roanoke County School Board (DB 597, page 112) and the herein -described tract, N. 73° 01' 00" W. a distance of 890.55 feet to a point, said point being the common comer of the aforesaid Roanoke County School Board (DB 597, page 112) and the property of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors as recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in DB 1120, page 228 and the southwesterly corner of the herein -described tract, being on the northeasterly line of the property of Duane Williams and Alice D. Williams, as recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in DB 947, page 572; thence leaving the aforesaid Roanoke County School Board (DB 597, page 112) and with a common line of the aforesaid Williams property (DB 947, page 572) and herein -described tract, N. 02° 54' 07" W. a distance of 253.23 feet to a point, said point being a common corner of the aforesaid Williams property (DB 947, page 572) and the westerly corner of the herein -described tract and being situated on the southerly right-of-way of the aforesaid Wood Haven Road (Virginia Secondary Route 628); thence leaving the Williams property (DB 947, page 572) and with the southerly right-of-way of the aforesaid Wood Haven Road (Virginia Secondary Route 628) and herein -described tract, N. 52° 35' 33" E. 437.29 feet to the point of Beginning, and containing 9.603 acres, more or less, and being further described as Tax Map Nos. 37.05-1-1 and 37.05-1-2. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Harrison to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 3 A COPY TESTE: /6/Uitk Brenda J. Holt n, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney NORTH ROANOKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT GRAHAM THOMAS SUBDIVISION Rl C TO R.1 PETITIONER: GRAHAM-THOMAS CORP. CASE NUMBER: 4-3/98 Planning Commission Hearing Date: Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: March 3, 1998 March 24, 1998 U•� A. REQUEST Petition of Graham -Thomas Corporation to rezone 9.77 acres from R-1 conditional to R- 1 to construct single family residences, located at the south side of Woodhaven Road, approximately 0.5 mile east of its intersection with Green Ridge Road, in the Catawba Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS Duane Williams expressed concern with drainage that will affect his property and the loss of trees. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION Mr. Witt requested that a representative from engineering attend the Board meeting in order to respond to Mr. Williams' drainage concerns. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS None. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Ms. Hooker said that the proposal is better than the two-family development previously approved in 1988 and moved to recommend approval of the petition. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Hooker, Robinson, Ross, Thomason, Witt NAYS: None ABSTAIN: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report Other Terrance Harn on, S retary Roanoke C my Planning Commission • Roanoke County Department of Planning TO: Planning FROM: DATE: February RE: Terrance Director Memorandum Commission L. Harrington, AICP "' J4/ of Planning 27, 1998 Rezoning Petition of Graham -Thomas R-1; Woodhaven Road Corporation; R-1C to In July 1997 the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider an R-1C to R-1C rezoning request of Ernest Clark. Mr Clark was the owner of a 9.77 acre tract on Woodhaven Road. The request was to remove proffered conditions that were placed on the property during a previous 1988 rezoning request. The Commission recommended approval of Mr. Clark's petition in July 1997, retaining one condition pertaining to the designation of a pedestrian easement connecting the proposed subdivision to the adjacent County school property. At Mr. Clark's request his petition was repeatedly tabled by the Board of Supervisors until December 1997. In December, Mr. Clark withdrew his request, indicating that the contract purchasers of the property wished to use the original zoning granted in 1988. This property is now owned by the Graham -Thomas Corporation. The request before you is identical to the original request of Mr. Clark. The current owners wish to remove all of the 1988 proffered conditions on the property so that they can construct a 32 lot single family subdivision as shown on the conceptual plan attached to this report. I have also enclosed Mr. Hartley's June 19, 1997 report on the original request of Mr. Clark. This report contains the original conditions accepted in 1988 and discussed the proposed development. Mr. Hartley's report recommended the pedestrian easement condition be retained. Although initially proffered by Mr. Clark, the easement proffer was withdrawn shortly before Mr. Clark's application was withdrawn. The proffer was withdrawn because the School Board did not wish for a formal pedestrian access to this portion of the school property. The staff recommends the approval of the current petition of Graham -Thomas. Approval will allow the property to be developed as a single-family detached subdivision. • County of Roanoke Department of Planning and Zoning Memorandum TO: Planning Commission FROM: Jon Hartley DATE: June 19, 1997 RE: Background Request of Ernest Clark to rezone 9.77 acres from R-1 with conditions to R-1 to construct single family residences, located on the south side of Woodhaven Road, 0.5 mile east of its intersection with Green Ridge Road. The property in question was originally rezoned in April 1988 from R-1, Single Family Residential, to R-5, Residential to allow the construction of 70 townhouse units (35 duplex units) to be constructed on public roads. This proposal was approved by the Commission and Board with the following conditions. 1. Project will be in substantial conformity with the site plan of T. P. Parker & Son, submitted; 2. Streets will be developed in accordance with state standards and submitted for acceptance into state secondary system; 3. Units will be similar to design submitted; 4. A pedestrian footpath easement in at least two locations from the public streets within the subdivision to the adjoining school property will be shown on the recorded plat of development; and 5. Ten year storm detention will be provided with a two year storm release. The site plan submitted is attached as are copies of the submitted building designs. Since 1988, the property has remained undeveloped, although more detailed plans were reviewed by the County. In 1992 the property was rezoned under the Comprehensive Countywide rezoning. To remain consistent with all of the surrounding areas, the property was changed back to R-1, but retained the right to develop townhouses under the conditions cited above. Since the concept plan was proffered as a condition, no other layout or scheme of development can be considered until the conditions are revised or removed. Staff Analysis The owner is asking that all of the proffered conditions be removed in order to allow the development of 32 single family residences. Staff has reviewed conceptually the proposed development plan and inspected the site. Some of the issues addressed in the 1988 conditions are now handled administratively, including requirements for the design and construction of public roads, and construction of a storm water detention basin. Other conditions, such as the proffered layout or design, are not normally addressed in single family developments. Given these factors, removing the conditions would reduce the density of development, consistent with the surrounding area, and in turn reduce the overall impacts on roads and community facilities that the development of this property might have. The one existing condition staff would suggest retaining in some form is the requirement for pedestrian access between the public roads in the development and the school property to the south. Frequently properties which are adjacent to a school on a dead end street become an` unofficial corridor for student foot and bicycle traffic during school session. Attempts to control this type of access has been somewhat controversial and problematic to the school administration. To meet what the staff and school administration perceive as a critical need, it is recommended that one pedestrian access easement be provided. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the proposed request be approved with the suggestion that the following statement be substituted as a condition: 1. One twenty foot wide pedestrian easement is to be provided between the public roads system and the property of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors in a location acceptable to the developer and School Administrative staff that would be suitable for pedestrian and non -motorized traffic. Any and all improvements associated with this access shall be the responsibility of County. • COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 5204 Bernard Dr._. P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 ( 540' 772-2068 FAX (540) 772-2108 For staff use only date received:- received Lot do application fee: $615 PC/BZA date: 3/3/9R placards issued: /9/98 BOS date: 3/2-4/98 Case Number: 4-3/98 is Eli`''i:'i;:`:?,i;isisi;iii:isi;iE?'ii?iii':hilt'::`•;is`'•isi:ii;i:i?i:i:i;i?:ii ii;i; `•::isisi•` `•i<: ;:'`;' is i i :iiii:::::::::::::::p:i:;:p:.:;:E:i:.-...•.•.............................. ...... .. . Check type of application I REZONING filed ■ (check all that apply): SPECIAL USE IN VARIANCE Applicant's name: Graham -Thomas Corporation Phone: 389-8193 Address: 494 Glenmore Dr Salem, VA 24153 Zip Code: Owner's name: SAME Phone: Address: Zip Code: Location of property: South side of Woodhaven Road approx. 1/2 mile east of Greenridge Road Tax Map Number: 37.05-1-1 37.05-1-2 Magisterial District: catawba Community Planning Area: Peters Creek Size of parcel (s): 9.77 acres Existing Zoning: R-1 Conditional Existing Land Use: Vacant sq.ft. Proposed Zoning: R-1 Proposed Land Use: Single -Family Subdivision.. For Staff Use Only use Type: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES XX NO iF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES XX NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED iF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v X x x Consultation Application Justification ws V x lz x>.f 8 1/2" x 1 1" concept plan Metes and bounds description Water and sewer application ars V x Application fee Proffers, if applicable Adjoining property owners I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the kno ledge and consent of the owr�e,4 Owner's Signature: s.C1 CD I•A ‘40, • 0 ‘... i\ •-.... ..,-- •------_ ----- ------0- c‘ ---5-- : ....:,.......---* .,,,,yr.-•_"--. -------- — JO' M0.�E nvrtTxs 18 1O ST JR.(S 4Jwo'sp• \( ^re ig' �\ \Q ,--- °`'p;;4`ra` ii Az+ LAKE fl ag• �i' RCLNWEv. rio X'1A' �/ „, 1(SWR (� �:000VlMTlOw'.tL T x.Iv- ��1'_LtF [ \ N. I vj' SG}O�l SAL l VICINITY MAP P/0 26.17-I_3 ROANOKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT i 'CX1T41>z '\ 1... —� ® �j`r,T .ate I, j Rw\rs+av� Po-'_ $it wo-�oG[�tj\ l _M!f.. z R1-C Co**, Srnw/ !m- ✓ .M.M. CG P/0 3706-I-T5 NORTH I R1 v-60 k,I-SI P Nh side L. t 5 GRAHAM THOMAS SUBDIVISION R1 C TO R1 1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 9.77-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT THE SOUTH SIDE OF WOOD HAVEN ROAD APPROXIMATELY .05 MILE EAST OF ITS INTERSECTION WITH GREEN RIDGE ROAD (TAX MAP NOS. 37.05-1-1 AND 37.05-1-2) IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1, CONDITIONAL, TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1, UPON THE APPLICATION OF GRAHAM-THOMAS CORPORATION WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 24, 1998, and the second reading and public hearing was held on March 24, 1998; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 3, 1998; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 9.77 acres, as described herein, and located at the south side of Wood Haven Road approximately 0.5 mile east of its intersection with Green Ridge Road (Tax Map Numbers 37.05-1-1 and 37.05-1-2) in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-1, Conditional, to the zoning classification of R-1, Low Density Residential District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Graham -Thomas Corporation 3. That in 1988 rezoning of this property the owner of the property voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, accepted and the Petitioner/Owner is now requesting be removed: (1) Project will be in substantial conformity with the site plan of T. P. �) Sheets : ill be devclop�ed in-accor ante • r:tl. state st.,ndarrls .n (3) Units will be similar to design submitted; till A .a �t••1..�...tionfr.++++ the public streets : r;thithe adjoining_cc i rop rty ,;lam ll v —slitE RI-en4h c rccordcd plat „f do plemcntt and- (5) Ten ear storrr� dete do :.rill be provided with .. two year storm relmsc. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the southerly right-of-way of Wood Haven Road (Virginia Secondary Route 628) being a common corner of the property of Minnie G. Lewis and Stafford Lewis, as recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 589, page 196, the northwesterly corner of the point of Beginning in the herein -described tract; thence leaving the aforesaid southerly right-of-way of Wood Haven Road (Virginia Secondary Route 628) with the common line of the aforesaid Lewis property (DB 589, page 196) and the herein -described tract, S. 48° 42' 49" E. passing the common corner of the aforesaid Lewis property (DB 589, page 196) and the property of Ebenezer Baptist Church as recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in DB 1125, page 664 and passing the a common corner of the aforesaid Ebenezer Baptist Church Property (DB 1125, page 664) and the property of Roy E. Lewis and Christine E. Lewis, DB 1120, page 161, in all a total distance of 888.35' feet to an existing set stone; said point being a common corner of Roanoke County School Board as recorded in DB 597, page 112 and the northeasterly corner of the herein - described tract and on the southerly line of the aforesaid Roy E. Lewis property (DB 1120, page 161); thence leaving the property of the aforesaid Roy E. Lewis (DB 2 �""to 1120, page 161) and with the common line of the aforesaid Roanoke County School Board (DB 597, page 112) and herein -described tract, S. 37°59' 18" W. a distance of 244.27 feet to an existing set stone, said point being the southeasterly corner of the herein -described tract; thence continuing with a common line for the aforesaid Roanoke County School Board (DB 597, page 112) and the herein -described tract, N. 73° 01' 00" W. a distance of 890.55 feet to a point, said point being the common corner of the aforesaid Roanoke County School Board (DB 597, page 112) and the property of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors as recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in DB 1120, page 228 and the southwesterly corner of the herein - described tract, being on the northeasterly line of the property of Duane Williams and Alice D. Williams, as recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in DB 947, page 572; thence leaving the aforesaid Roanoke County School Board (DB 597, page 112) and with a common line of the aforesaid Williams property (DB 947, page 572) and herein -described tract, N. 02° 54' 07" W. a distance of 253.23 feet to a point, said point being a common corner of the aforesaid Williams property (DB 947, page 572) and the westerly corner of the herein -described tract and being situated on the southerly right-of-way of the aforesaid Wood Haven Road (Virginia Secondary Route 628); thence leaving the Williams property (DB 947, page 572) and with the southerly right-of-way of the aforesaid Wood Haven Road (Virginia Secondary Route 628) and herein -described tract, N. 52° 35' 33" E. 437.29 feet to the point of Beginning, and containing 9.603 acres, more or less, and being further described as Tax Map Nos. 37.05-1-1 and 37.05-1-2. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. g:\attorney\board\graham.rzn 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998 ORDINANCE 032498-18 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO OHIO STATE CELLULAR PHONE CO., INC. TO CONSTRUCT A COMMUNICATIONS TOWER ON A 3.171 ACRE PARCEL AT 5585 CATAWBA HOSPITAL DRIVE (TAX MAP NO. 7.00-1-29), CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Ohio State Cellular Phone Co., Inc. has filed a petition to construct a communications tower located at 5585 Catawba Hospital Drive (Tax Map No. 7.00-1-29) in the Catawba Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, approved a Special Use Permit on November 18, 1997, contingent upon the acquisition of an additional three acres from the Commonwealth of Virginia by December 16, 1997; and WHEREAS, the additional three acres was not acquired by December 16, 1997, and the Special Use Permit became null and void; and WHEREAS, by deed dated February 11, 1998, the Commonwealth of Virginia granted the three acre parcel to the County of Roanoke, Virginia; and WHEREAS, Ohio State Cellular Phone Co., Inc. has resubmitted the Special Use Permit petition with the same conditions approved by the Board of Supervisors on November 18, 1997; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 3, 1998, and requested that condition number (2) pertaining to visibility of the tower be revised to delete the word "painted"; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on February 24, 1998; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on March 24, 1998; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Ohio State Cellular Phone Co., Inc. to construct a communications tower located at 5585 Catawba Hospital Drive (Tax Map No. 7.00-1-29) in the Catawba Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.2-2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved with the following conditions: (1) The height of the tower structure, excluding any antenna attached to the structure, shall be not more than 190 feet. (2) The tower structure and all attached support hardware shall be painted a flat matted color so as to better blend into the landscape and reduce visibility and light reflection. (3) No lighting shall be installed on the tower structure or equipment building except for security lighting not to exceed a height of 25 feet in height, except as may be required by the FAA or other governmental or regulatory agency. (4) This tower shall be structurally designed to carry sufficient loading and the site developed to accommodate the additional buildings necessary to accommodate co -locating of communications equipment of at least one other vendor/provider in order to minimize the proliferation of towers in the vicinity of this site. In addition, by executing the special use 2 2 (5) permit requested, the applicant agrees to make the tower available for lease within the structural capacity of the tower and at reasonable costs adequate to recover the capital, operating and maintenance costs of the tower location required for the additional capacity. If the use of the tower structure for wireless communications is discontinued, the tower structure shall be dismantled and removed from the site within 30 days of notice by the County and the special use permit shall become void. (6) Any damage to the existing paving for the parking lot, apron, or access to the fire station resulting from the construction or operation of the tower, shall be repaired at the expense of the petitioner. (7) Public emergency communications equipment shall be accommodated at no expense to the County. (8) The location of the tower structure and related equipment shall be as shown on a plat entitled "Catawba Cellular Phone Tower Site Plan, Roanoke County, Virginia" prepared by LMW, P.C., Engineering, Architecture, Surveying, dated 11/18/97. 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon after the receipt and acceptance by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County of a deed from the Commonwealth of Virginia for an additional three (3) acres of real estate, which shall be added and combined to Tax Map No. 7.00-1-29. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Harrison to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 3 3 A COPY TESTE: teA4_4& AQ/a2_o.o,i Brenda J. Holton,eputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 4 4 LEG.01D• SURVEYED PROPERTY UNE — — DEED: UNE SET REAR 0 EXISTING IRON FOUND NOTES': 1. THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE SEARCH AND THEREFORE MAY NOT SHOW ALL ENCUMBRANCES. 2. THIS PROPERTY AS PLATTED DOES NOT FALL WITHINSTHE 100 YEAR FLOOD ZONE. 3. THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED FROM AN ACTUAL AND1 CURRENT FIELD SURVEY. 4. FEMA, FLOOD. ZONE: 'X' 5. LEGAL R'' "ENCE:.�� 213 PG 231 M. NO: 7.00-1-5 GRAPHIC SCALE ( TN FEET ) 1 inch 80 ft. GL EDI No. 1450 ..401.40/4:44:ze -'1' HEREB CERTIFY THIS PLAT OF SURVEY TO BE, CORRECT TO THE BEST+ OF: MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF I' i 1! 14 11 li1r. 1 4. is: NOW OR FORMERLY • PROPERTY OF CAT, V'IBA STATE SANITORIUM • 1 DtB.:, 213 PAGE 231 TAX ;NAP ;NO. 7.00-1-5 '• .iv 1 1 .:: 1 I • IPS 4. NOW 0R FORMERLY 4, PROPERTY OF CATAWBA STATE SANITORIUM D.B. 213 PAGE 231 TAX MAP N0. 7.00-1-5 P.C. IPS ,�y.�4 / / 50 d / IPF CATAWBA yQ Tq4 VICINITY MAP NO SCALE NOW OR FORMERLY PROPERTY OF CATAWBA STATE SANITORIUM D.B. 45 PAGE 350 IPF PROPERTY OF ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS .89 acres J 1PS JQ� f i �0 v IPS pt % \ \ PLAT OF SURVEY SHOWING 3.171 ACRES FOR ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LOCATED IN IPS CATAWBA FIRE STATION A /" TAX MAP NO. 7.00-01-29 �o'• �^� �tip�S/ / �p s0/,e/ ry� / / 1 IPF ENGINEERING. ARc:.xrrECTURE•SURVEYING CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (540) '345-0675 1401 2nd STREET, S.Y. ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA FAX (540) 342-4456 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24016 REVISED: 1-22-98 SURVEYED: 12-10-97 COMM: 1437E PETITIONER: OHIO STATE CELLULAR (CATAWBA) CASE NUMBER: 5-3/98 Planning Commission Hearing Date: Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: March 3, 1998 March 24, 1998 A. REQUEST Petition of Ohio State Cellular Phone Co. Inc. to obtain a Special Use Permit to construct a 190 ft. self-supporting broadcast tower on a 3.171 acre parcel, located at 5585 Catawba Hospital Drive, Catawba Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Commission requested that condition number two pertaining to visibility of the tower be revised to delete the word "painted." D. SUGGESTED CONDITIONS (1) The height of the tower structure, excluding any antenna attached to the structure, shall be not more than 190 feet. (2) The tower structure and all attached support hardware shall be a flat matted color so as to better blend into the landscape and reduce visibility and light reflection. (3) No lighting shall be installed on the tower structure or equipment building except for security lighting not to exceed a height of 25 feet in height, except as may be required by the FAA or other governmental or regulatory agency. (4) This tower shall be structurally designed to carry sufficient loading and the site developed to accommodate the additional buildings necessary to accommodate co - locating of communications equipment of at least one other vendor/provider in order to minimize the proliferation of towers in the vicinity of this site. In addition, by executing the special use permit requested, the applicant agrees to make the tower available for lease within the structural capacity of the tower and at reasonable costs adequate to recover the capital, operating and maintenance costs of the tower location required for the additional capacity. If the use of the tower structure for wireless communications is discontinued, the tower structure shall be dismantled and removed from the site within 30 days of notice by the County and the special use permit shall become void. Any damage to the existing paving for the parking lot, apron, or access to the fire station resulting from the construction or operation of the tower, shall be repaired at the expense of the petitioner. (7) Public emergency communications equipment shall be accommodated at no expense to the County. (8) The location of the tower structure and related equipment shall be as shown on a plat entitled "Catawba Cellular Phone Tower Site Plan, Roanoke County, Virginia" prepared by LMW, P.C., Engineering, Architecture, Surveying, dated 11/18/97. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Ms. Hooker moved to recommend approval of the petition with the amended condition. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Hooker, Robinson, Ross, Thomason, Witt NAYS: None ABSTAIN: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Staff Report _ Vicinity Map Other Terrance H ingtoncretary Roanoke ounty Planning Commission Roanoke County Department of Planning Memorandum TO: Planning Commission FROM: Terrance L. Harrington, AICP Director of Planning DATE: February 25, 1998 RE: Special Use Permit Request of Ohio State Cellular Corporation; Installation of a 190 foot Broadcasting Tower located at 5585 Catawba Hospital Road. This petition is a resubmittal of an earlier Special Use Permit petition submitted by Ohio State Cellular and approved by the Board of Supervisors on November 18, 1997. The original approval contained a number of conditions related to the design and operation of the tower. (See attached ordinance) In addition, several conditions were attached to the ordinance that pertained to the envisioned acquisition of an additional three acres of land from Catawba Hospital. As you may recall, the Catawba Fire and Rescue Squad had some initial concerns about the placement of the tower close to the parking lot. The acquisition of the additional three acres would allow the tower and associated improvements to be moved away from the parking lot, thus reducing the chance that the tower might interfere with any future expansion of the station. The ordinance approved by the Board in November stated that the approval was contingent upon the acquisition of the three acres and also was contingent on the acquisition occurring by December 16, 1997. The three acres was not acquired by this December date. Thus the action of the Board became void. The County is continuing to work with the hospital and the State of Virginia on this land transfer, and it appears that the deed to the land will be transmitted to the County within the next few weeks. The staff requests that the Commission evaluate this resubmitted request and recommend approval to the Board with the site and operational conditions originally adopted by the Board. These • (6) (7) (8) • conditions are as follows: (1) The height of the tower structure, excluding any antenna attached to the structure, shall be not more than 190 feet. (2) The tower structure and all attached support hardware shall be painted a flat matted color so as to better blend into the landscape and reduce visibility and light reflection. (3) No lighting shall be installed on the tower structure or equipment building except for security lighting not to exceed a height of 25 feet in height, except as may be required by the FAA or other governmental or regulatory agency. (4) This tower shall be structurally designed to carry sufficient loading and the site developed to accommodate the additional buildings necessary to accommodate co -locating of communications equipment of at least one other vendor/provider in order to minimize the proliferation of towers in the vicinity of this site. In addition, by executing the special use permit requested, the applicant agrees to make the tower available for lease within the structural capacity of the tower and at reasonable costs adequate to recover the capital, operating and maintenance costs of the tower location required for the additional capacity. (5) If the use of the tower structure for wireless communications is discontinued, the tower structure shall be dismantled and removed from the site within 30 days, of notice by the County and the special use permit shall become void. Any damage to the existing paving for the parking lot, apron, or access to the fire station resulting from the construction or operation of the tower, shall be'repaired at the expense of the petitioner. Public emergency communications equipment shall be accommodated at no expense to the County. The location of the tower structure and related equipment shall be as shown on a plat entitled "Catawba Cellular Phone Tower Site Plan, Roanoke County, Virginia" prepared by LMW, P.C., Engineering, Architecture, Surveying, dated 11/18/97. • • • Maw dated Varified AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE -BOARD OF SUPER ^�.QE- S-ROA l COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY AL ismATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 1997 ORDINANCE 111897-06 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO OHIO STATE CELLULAR PHONE CO., INC. TO CONSTRUCT A COMMUNICATIONS TOWER AT 5585 CATAWBA HOSPITAL DRIVE (TAX MAP NO. 7.00-1-29), CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Ohio State Cellular Phone Co., Inc. has filed -a petition to construct a communications tower located at 5585 Catawba Hospital Drive (Tax Map No. 7.00-1-29) in the Catawba Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on October 7, 1997; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on September 23, 1997; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on October 28, 1997, and continued to November 18, 1997. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Ohio State Cellular Phone Co., Inc. to construct a communications tower located at 5585 Catawba Hospital Drive (Tax Map No. 7.00-1-29) in the Catawba Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1- 456 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved with the following conditions: (1) The height of the tower structure, excluding any antenna attached to the structure, shall be not more than 190 feet. 1 • • • (2) The tower structure and all attached support hardware shall be painted a flat matted color so as to better blend into the landscape and reduce visibility and Tight reflection. (3) No lighting shall be installed on the tower structure or equipment building except for security lighting not to exceed a height of 25 feet in height, except as may be required by the FAA or other governmental or regulatory agency. (4) This tower shall be structurally designed to carry sufficient loading and the site developed to accommodate the additional buildings necessary to accommodate co -locating of communications equipment of at least one other vendor/provider in order to minimize the proliferation of towers in the vicinity of this site. In addition, by executing the special use permit requested, the applicant agrees to make the tower available for lease within the structural capacity of the tower and at reasonable costs adequate to recover the capital, operating and maintenance costs of the tower location required for the additional capacity. (5) If the use of the tower structure for wireless communications is discontinued, the tower structure shall be dismantled and removed from the site within 30 days of notice by the County and the special use permit shall become void. (6) Any damage to the existing paving for the parking lot, apron, or access to the fire station resulting from _the construction or operation of the tower, shall be repaired at the expense of the petitioner. (7) Public emergency communications equipment shall be accommodated at no expense to the County. (8) The location of the tower structure and related equipment shall be as shown on a plat entitled "Catawba .Cellular Phone Tower Site Plan, Roanoke County, Virginia" prepared by LMW, P.C., Engineering, Architecture, Surveying, dated 11/18/97. 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon after the receipt and acceptance by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County of a deed from the Commonwealth of Virginia for an additional three (3) acres of real estate, which shall be added and combined to Tax Map No. 7.00-1-29. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in 2 • • conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. 3. That, in the event the aforementioned deed from the Commonwealth of Virginia for an additional three (3) acres of real estate is not received and accepted by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County by December 16, 1997, this ordinance shall be deemed null and void, and thereby, shall be repealed. On motion of Supervisor Harrison to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Holt`bn., Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment 3 COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 5204 Bernard Dr. P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 ( 540' 772-2068 FAX (540) 772-2108 For staff use only date received:• received by: application fee: r'ef PC/BZA date: 1/2r/1 " placards issued: SOS date: Case Number: .�` "� /7 J Check type of applicatio filed (check all that apply): SPECIAL USE • REZONING III VARIANCE Applicant's name: Cyr° e?4-7 ccuut ";-�,'Q`4i f. C.,,,, Phone: ;ram. F cf 3/`�% • 0,3a ,,.r-•,� �`ra u�% Address: 2xe lc o Zip Code: c o3% y7r tt. ,+'f !_�r�-, 44 .-Q; -S4° C Pico. Q, X s . Owner's name: 664 4.0 .P4 4,,,4,r.,-4"t "';J 44-34,- C''' , 1/6' Phone: 7n_ 7. 00 Address: I ° o3Jr �'�90 Zip Code: 2yoi8 / o t a+. I/!.i • eLCfoi j' Location of property: , 552.c C' Tsar,. L✓a / 1''pN. To i- ,'>1 . Tax Map Number: "7, c o- i_a 1 Magisterial District: C7,41,"i0,4 Community Planning Area: 'n7,,o,.:d.&p. Size of parcel (s): acres Existing Zoning: 4AV,46-3 • Existing Land Use: v,0c;7 / �.,u 1y,,',.1 sq.ft. Proposed Zoning: ' Proposed Land Use: c � For Staff Use Only use Type: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, YES NO IF NO, A VARIANCE and frontage requirements of the requested district? IS REQUIRED FIRST. requested Use Type? YES .-` NO Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES ,,.' NO Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. MIS V x Consultation Application Justification MIS V 8 1 /2" x 1 1" concept plan Metes and bounds description Water and sewer application WS V X Application fee Proffers, if applicable Adjoining property owners l hereby certify that l am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent the owner. Owner's Signature: ce--cr/ 2-27-1998 11:52AM FROM LMW/GARST 15403424458 P. 2 / Prsorr n fAP.F ORTINO c JJJtAR E TOMER wTTCE -ws) O PROPOSED TONER EWIPMER: OUI [4,mY▪ ,O CNAW \UNK SAFETY FENCE / 1 I / / NOW OR PORRRtT ATAA8A (f: SJNRORMU/ /DB. A3 PAOE 330 IPF / / / /4,////ri-� /./// /' �/ J / /// N// ,,90� I // _�- / l n_ I - /, - - PROPfjmTY cc / / ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD CP SUPERVISORS / // / PAVED ORM / ../ /,/ /® / /7/' / © \ / P/ PROPOSED cyAPcRc *'N // CATE ENIBANCE ''� 4LERCRCWNE NryO0.33tRICAL ✓ ---7„ / IPF / i ® Pp?SR POLE ✓ / / / / NOW OR POP PROPCRYY CATANIA STATE ,GANITORWM C.S. 46 PACS 350 R0AOR1 TOPER CONE rD R CONE VAC AWL ACEI'IU RDAu RMMOEf COLINTV BOARD p1F� D67gf'�1.4CR3 TAA MAD �.�.�1-7a __ OVFRNEAD (S4&J. J . ED BY IofM FITrTR ♦I Div lYY MPANY0DE) \ Ns PAPA R►tMEO 1 STORY METAL MA60NRY RUAll w 6TAPON CLARKAD lts�il NM1: A NhuyE ✓>/ NOW CR FORMERLY PROPERTY O< CATAWBA STATE JNIITO°t N 0,6. 43 PAGE 330 Ta. PAVIA DNM. / 9/ / j,-� / �J�` �/• / j �1 '/1/// / / L / / V / /// / J LEGEND SURVEYED PROPERTY UNE — — DEED: UNE ® SET REBAR 0 EXISTING IRON FOUND ea NOTES: 1. THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE SEARCH AND THEREFORE MAY NOT SHOW ALL ENCUMBRANCES. 2. THIS PROPERTY AS PLATTED DOES NOT FALL WITHINSTHE 100 YEAR FLOOD ZONE. 3. THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED FROM AN ACTUAL AND1 CURRENT FIELD SURVEY. 4. FEMA, FLOODZONE: 'X' 5. LEGAL R r "ENCE:. 213 PG 231 TAX' M'' NO: 7.00-1-5 ,/ GRAPHIC SCALE -'f HEREB CERTIFY THIS PLAT OF SURVEY TO BE. TO THE BEST 0F:MY KNOWLEDGE AND BEUEF 1' j. i Gq.G . l:;b,NOW OR FORMERLY PROPERTY OF CAT, W8A STATE SANITORIUM • h 1,41OzO.! 213 PAGE 231 TAX 0,1AP,•NO. 7.00-1-5 •� i 1 1 .I Da IPS ti NOW OR FORMERLY 4 PROPERTY OF CATAWBA STATE SANITORIUM D.B. 213 PAGE 231 TAX MAP NO. 7.00-1-5 P.0 • (INFEET ) 1 inch mr BO ft. CO IPS69b / IPS � ,aj'��Q. / 11 / 5 . ENGINEERING • ARCHITECTURE • SURVEYING (540) '345-0875 1401 2nd STREET, S.W. ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA FAX (540) 342-4456 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24016 REVISED: 1-22-96 SURVEYED: 12-10-97 COMM: 14378 433 r. • s F .89 acres SITE VICINITY MAP NO SCALE NOW OR FORMERLY PROPERTY OF CATAWBA STATE SANITORIUM 0.8. 45 PAGE 350 PP PROPERTY OF ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CATAWBA FIRE STATION �%o TAX MAP NO. 7.00-01-29 �c>. ;^j /t / 5�P1/ / �o'Y F /. / IPF IPF/ F-A 1 '") PLAT OF SURVEY SHOWING 3.171 ACRES FOR ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LOCATED IN CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998 ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO OHIO STATE CELLULAR PHONE CO., INC. TO CONSTRUCT A COMMUNICATIONS TOWER ON A 3.171 ACRE PARCEL AT 5585 CATAWBA HOSPITAL DRIVE (TAX MAP NO. 7.00-1-29), CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Ohio State Cellular Phone Co., Inc. has filed a petition to construct a communications tower located at 5585 Catawba Hospital Drive (Tax Map No. 7.00-1-29) in the Catawba Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, approved a Special Use Permit on November 18, 1997, contingent upon the acquisition of an additional three acres from the Commonwealth of Virginia by December 16, 1997; and WHEREAS, the additional three acres was not acquired by December 16, 1997, and the Special Use Permit became null and void; and WHEREAS, by deed dated February 11, 1998, the Commonwealth of Virginia granted the three acre parcel to the County of Roanoke, Virginia; and WHEREAS, Ohio State Cellular Phone Co., Inc. has resubmitted the Special Use Permit petition with the same conditions approved by the Board of Supervisors on November 18, 1997; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 3, 1998, and requested that condition number (2) pertaining to visibility of the tower be revised to delete the word "painted"; and 1 WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on February 24, 1998; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on March 24, 1998; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Ohio State Cellular Phone Co., Inc. to construct a communications tower located at 5585 Catawba Hospital Drive (Tax Map No. 7.00-1-29) in the Catawba Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.2-2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved with the following conditions: (1) The height of the tower structure, excluding any antenna attached to the structure, shall be not more than 190 feet. (2) The tower structure and all attached support hardware shall be pai a flat matted color so as to better blend into the landscape and reduce visibility and light reflection. (3) No lighting shall be installed on the tower structure or equipment building except for security lighting not to exceed a height of 25 feet in height, except as may be required by the FAA or other governmental or regulatory agency. (4) This tower shall be structurally designed to carry sufficient loading and the site developed to accommodate the additional buildings necessary to accommodate co -locating of communications equipment of at least one other vendor/provider in order to minimize the proliferation of towers in the vicinity of this site. In addition, by executing the special use permit requested, the applicant agrees to make the tower available for 2 U: lease within the structural capacity of the tower and at reasonable costs adequate to recover the capital, operating and maintenance costs of the tower location required for the additional capacity. (5) If the use of the tower structure for wireless communications is discontinued, the tower structure shall be dismantled and removed from the site within 30 days of notice by the County and the special use permit shall become void. (6) Any damage to the existing paving for the parking lot, apron, or access to the fire station resulting from the construction or operation of the tower, shall be repaired at the expense of the petitioner. (7) Public emergency communications equipment shall be accommodated at no expense to the County. (8) The location of the tower structure and related equipment shall be as shown on a plat entitled "Catawba Cellular Phone Tower Site Plan, Roanoke County, Virginia" prepared by LMW, P.C., Engineering, Architecture, Surveying, dated 11/18/97. 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon after the receipt and acceptance by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County of a deed from the Commonwealth of Virginia for an additional three (3) acres of real estate, which shall be added and combined to Tax Map No. 7.00-1-29. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. g:\attorney\board\ohiocell.ord 3 Crann#g of aanaite COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (540) 772-2004 Mr. David A. Stroud Flood Training Coordinator Insurance Services Office, Inc. 7 World Trade Center New York, New York 10048-1199 Dear Mr. Stroud: P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (540) 772-2193 January 29, 1998 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BOB L. JOHNSON, CHAIRMAN HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS, VICE-CHAIRMAN VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FENTON F. "SPIKE" HARRISON, JR. CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT JOSEPH MCNAMARA WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (540) 772-2005 Thank you for your letter of January 22 advising that we need to provide you with an adopted floodplain management plan or lose the rating that County citizens have on flood insurance. We are working through this as quickly as we can and ask that you give us until the end of March. As you are aware, Roanoke County has not had a floodplain plan in the past and neither did Roanoke City or most other localities in the area. Because of the recurring problems with flooding, this is a requirement to keep flood insurance rates low. We have been working to develop a Roanoke Valley Regional Stormwater Management Plan along with the Cities of Roanoke and Salem and the Town of Vinton. Some of your staff have been here to review this with us. The study was conducted by the engineering firm of Dewberry Davis, and the Plan was completed in October, 1997. It cost the four localities $700,000. We reviewed this with the Board of Supervisors in a work session in November, 1997 and again on January 27, 1998. The Plan will be considered by the Roanoke County Planning Commission on March 3 and forwarded to the Board of Supervisors for action on March 27. We intend to incorporate this into the County's Comprehensive Plan to be a guide for addressing stormwater on a regional basis. I hope this provides the assurance that you need to grant us the extension of time and to retain our Class 9 rating. If you need additional information, please let me know. Your consideration is most appreciated. ECH/meh Sincerely, zi(L- Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator cc - Board of Supervisors Mr. O. Arnold Covey, Director; Engineering and Inspections Department Mr. George W. Simpson, III, Assistant Director; Engineering and Inspections Department Mr. Terrance L. Harrington, Director; Planning and Zoning Department InteM-Mary H. Allen, Clerk; Board of Supervisor ehodge@www.co.roanoke.va.us Recycled Paper Internet E-Mail bos@www.co.roanoke.va.us (Cautttg riathatte MARY H. ALLEN, CMC CLERK TO THE BOARD Internet E-Mail: mallen@www.co.roanoke.va.us Mr. Richard Kelly 8564 Gravel Hill Road Catawba, VA 24070 Dear Mr. Kelly: P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (540) 772-2005 FAX (540) 772-2193 March 25, 1998 BRENDA J. HOLTON DEPUTY CLERK Internet E-Mail: bholton@www.co.roanoke.va.us The members of the Board of Supervisors wish to express their sincere appreciation for your previous service of the one-year initial term on the Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission. Citizens so responsive to the needs of their community and willing to give of themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce. I am pleased to inform you that, at their meeting held on Tuesday, March 24, 1998, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to reappoint you for a three year term as a member of the Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission. Your new term will begin on April 8, 1998, and expire on April 8, 2001. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, or appointed to any public body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act. Your copy is enclosed. We are also sending you a copy of the Conflict of Interest Act. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bjh cc: Elizabeth Belcher, Greenway Coordinator Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning ® Recycled Paper Ctnrntg of oaxtake MARY H. ALLEN, CMC CLERK TO THE BOARD Internet E-Mail: mallen@www.co.roanoke.va.us Ms. Jacqueline L. Shuck Executive Director Roanoke Regional Airport 5202 Aviation Drive Roanoke, VA 24012-1148 Dear Ms. Shuck: P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (540) 772-2005 FAX (540) 772-2193 March 25, 1998 BRENDA J. HOLTON DEPUTY CLERK Internet E-Mail: bholton@www.co.roanoke.va.us Attached is a copy of Resolution 032498-4 approving the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Budget for FY 1998-99. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, March 24, 1998. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, zpc/. Mary H. Allen, CMC Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Attachment cc: Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Bob L. Johnson, Chairman, Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Mary F. Parker, Clerk, Roanoke City Council e Recycled Paper ttiuxttg of Riaxwtu MARY H. ALLEN, CMC CLERK TO THE BOARD Internet E-Mail: mallen@www.co.roanoke.va.us P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (540) 772-2005 FAX (540) 772-2193 March 25, 1998 Ms. Mary F. Parker, CMC/AAE Roanoke City Council 215 Church Avenue Roanoke, VA 24011 Ms. Carolyn Ross, Clerk Vinton Town Council P. O. Box Vinton, VA 24179 Mr. Forest Jones, Clerk Salem City Council P. O. Box 238 Salem, VA 24153 BRENDA J. HOLTON DEPUTY CLERK Internet E-Mail: bholton@www.co.roanoke.va.us Dear Mary, Carolyn and Forest: Attached is a copy of Resolution 032498-12 amending and reenacting the Comprehensive Plan of Roanoke County, Virginia by the adoption of the Roanoke Valley Regional Stormwater Management Plan as part of the Comprehensive Plan. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, March 24, 1998. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, CMC Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Attachment cc: Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Wayne Strickland, Executive Director, Fifth Planning District Commission ® Recycled Paper DRAFT - 3/19/98 - 5:00 P.M. ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA MARCH 24, 1998 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement in order to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings or other programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County, please contact the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772-2005. We request that you provide at least 48-hours notice so that proper arrangements may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call. 2. Invocation: Gardner W. Smith, Deputy Assistant for Citizen Services 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag. B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Resolution of appreciation upon the retirement of Edward "Gene"Burford, General Services. D. BRIEFINGS E. NEW BUSINESS - q est to ap • • e the Roan • unty Bondi C • `ee' comm - ndati • ���• = ecl r ton an • A • ciates : e `efault. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 2. Request to accept and appropriate monies from the Virginia Juvenile Community Crime Control Act and adopt the resolution prioritizing the expenditure of the grant proceeds. (John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator) Consideration of claim by Edward C. Woodard (Sewer backup). (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) oji of c�"tat'm- aul • `= unt ttey) (Suter 5. Resolution approving the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Budget for Fiscal Year 1997/98. (Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance) 6. Request for approval of the 1998/99 Cable TV Budget. (Anne Marie Green, Community Relations Director) 7. Adoption of resolution requesting the Virginia Department of Transportation to adopt recommended lists of Primary and Interstate projects for the 1998-2004 Six Year Improvement Plan. (Arnold Covey, Director of Engineering & Inspections) F. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS AND FIRST READINGS OF REZONING ORDINANCES - CONSENT AGENDA 1. First reading of ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to add a wireless telecommunications tower to an existing facility, located at 4135 West Main Street, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Ohio State Cellular. 2. First reading of ordinance to rezone approximately 2.0 acres from C-1 to C-2 and obtain a Special Use Permit to construct a home for adults, located at the southwest corner of Rosecrest and Route 221, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the petition of Stephen and Marie Freeman. 3. First reading of ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to allow a dance hall, located at 5610 Williamson Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Taylor Yeh and Jermaine English. 4. First reading of ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to expand an existing religious assembly facility, located at 4804 Stanley Farm Road, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Glenvar Baptist Church. 5. First reading of ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to allow an outdoor gathering in the 7000 and 8000 blocks of Woodhaven Road, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Old German Baptist Church. 6. First reading of ordinance to amend the Planned Industrial District of the Roanoke Zoning Ordinance and rename the district the Planned Technology Development District, upon the petition of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. 7 First reading of ordinance to rezone 456.6 acres from R-1, residential to Planning Technology Development District, for a business and commercial park, located in the 5300 3 block of Glenmary Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. G. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Second reading of ordinance a !zing an expansio use existing elec ' ransmission li 1 = ement ross a well to • ated Kentlan • e to American Electric Po . (Paul Mahone • unty Attorney) 1. Second reading of ordinance to vacate and release property interests conveyed to the Board of Supervisors in connection with roads, streets, alleys, rights -of -way, and public access in and around Pinkard Court Subdivision. (Vickie Huffman, Assistant County Attorney) H. APPOINTMENTS 1. Stormwater Management Citizen's Advisory Committee 2. League of Older Americans Advisory Council I. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Approval of minutes - February 10, 1998, February 12, 1998, February 24, 1998 and March 10, 1998. 2. Confirmation of committee appointment to Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission. 4 J. 3. Resolution requesting approval by the Virginia Department of Transportation of two proposed welcome signs and a landscaped planting area in the Clearbrook community within a public right of right in Roanoke County. 4. Request to donate a surplus water tank to Franklin County Parks & Recreation. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS K. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS L. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS M. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS N. REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Accounts Paid - February 1998 5. Statement of Revenues and Expenditures as of February 28, 1998. 6. Report from the Virginia Department of Transportation of changes to the Secondary System as of February 1998 5 7 Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investments and Portfolio Policy, as of February 28, 1998. O. WORK SESSIONS - 4th Floor Conference Room .1. Budget work session with School Board. (5:30 p.m.) 2. Economic Development strategy P. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A. EVENING SESSION - 7:00 P.M. Q. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION R. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Resolution of Congratulations to the William Byrd High School Girls Basketball Team for winning the Group AA State Championship. S. BRIEFINGS AND PRESENTATIONS 1. Budget requests from Fire and Rescue Chiefs. 2. Budget requests from Human Services, Social Services, Cultural and Tourism agencies. T. PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. First reading of ordinance requesting to vacate a portion 6 of a 10-foot public utility easement located across Lots 6, 7, 8, 16, 17, and 18, Section 2, Starmount, as recorded in Plat book 3, Page 135, located in the Hollins Magisterial District. (Arnold Covey, Director of Engineering & Inspections) U. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Second reading of ordinance amending and reenacting the Comprehensive Plan by the adoption of the Roanoke Valley Regional Stormwater Management Plan as part of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning and Zoning) 2. Second reading of ordinance amending and reenacting Section 10-33 Real Estate Services, Section 10-34, Professional Services, and Section 10-36, Personal and Business Service Occupations, of Article II. Classified Business and Occupational License Provisions of Chapter 10, Licenses, to increase the gross receipts from $3,000 to $5,000 for the exemption from payment of a license fee. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 3. Second reading of ordinance declaring a parcel of real estate surplus and authorizing sale of a well lot, Arlington Hills #2. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 4. Second reading of ordinance to rezone portions of a 30.28 acres from 1-1 to R-1 for public parks and recreation areas, located in the 6600 block of Merriman Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning and Zoning) 5. Second reading of ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to allow the construction of a new elementary school in the Bonsack Community, located at 5437 Crumpacker Drive, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of the Roanoke County School Board. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning and Zoning) 6. Second reading of ordinance to rezone 9.77 acres from R- 1 conditional to R-1 to construct single family residences, located at the south side of Woodhaven Road, approximately 0.5 mile east of its intersection with Green Ridge Road in the Catawba Magisterial District upon the petition of Graham -Thomas Corporation. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning and Zoning) 7. Second reading of ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to construct a 190 ft. self-supporting broadcast tower on a 3.171 acre parcel located at 5585 Catawba Hospital Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Ohio State Cellular Phone Company, Inc. (Terry Harrington, Director of Planning and Zoning) V. CITIZENS COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS W. ADJOURNMENT 8 Jan-22-98 11:54A t rendi- NOtkoh. TO: Mrs. Nary Allen ---Roanoke County Board of Supervisors FROM: Ric lard Thrasher ---Girls Basketball Coach William Byrd High School The foilowi ig students were members of our basketball program that went to the State tournamen during November of 1997. Kara Norcr )ss t- Dawn Che Mning Erin Calda ell Whitney Yf tes' Sarah Moore Lara Neste • Stephanie Parnell Andrea Ga ►---First Team All Blue Ridge District Brandy AIIe i---AA PLAYER OF THE YEAR IN VIRGINIA, First Team All State, First Team All Rigion, First Team All District (District Player of the Year, Region Player of the Year Brennan Sgei Nicole Bail )y Courtney F Dss J. J. McKin ley Jackie Killen Mammon Glenn Rife Justin Mitcl yell Kellen Willi,3ms Coaches Richard Thi asher---AA Coach of the Year in the State of Virginia Debbie Wil iams-Arthur Robin Hun! gate Garry Saur ders Tammy Nei vcomb P.01 Jan-22 -98 1 1 : 55A •ti j • ?rerc[ atfon rYl AL i , I it e,k_. Awards Presented at Girls' Basketball Banquet William Byrd High School Brandy Alb in ---Most Valuable Player, Leading Scorer in District, Leading Rebounder, District Player of the Year, Region III Player of the Year, AA State Player of the Year Andrea Ga r---First Team All District, Assists Leader, Steals Leader Erin Calder all ---Best Defensive Player, Captain Dawn Che vning---Unsung Hero, Best Free Throw Shooter Sarah Moc re ---Most Dedicated Player, Most Spirited Player, Captain Brennan S gel ---Most Improved Player Stephanie ametl--Field Goal % Leader Lara Neste •---3 pt. % Leader Richard Th •asher---AA Coach of the Year • COVER SHEET FAX Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Clerk's Office To: Richard Thrasher, William Byrd High School Fax #: 890-7568 Subject RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION FOR BASKETBALL TEAM Date: October 15, 1997 Pages: 1, including this cover sheet. COMMENTS: Mr. Thrasher, after we talked yesterday, I noticed that on my notes, I put down March 25, 1998, as the date of the March Board meeting. I think I told you that it was Tuesday, March 24 but in case there is some confusion, the date is March 24. We will meet at 3 p.m. and again at 7 p.m. Even though the date is far out, I wanted to straighten out any confusion I may have left you with about the date. Date of Board Meetings: February 10, 1998 at 3 p.m. only February 24, 1998 at 3 and 7 p.m. March 10, 1998 at 3 p.m. only March 24, 1998 at 3 and 7 p.m. Thank you for your help in arranging this presentation. Look forward to hearing from you later. From the desk of... Brenda J. Holton Deputy Clerk Roanoke County P. 0. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 540-772-2005 Fax: 540-221-2193 • to> January 20, 1998 8:56 p.m. RE: INVITATION TO WILLIAM BYRD HIGH SCHOOL TO COME TO BOARD MEETING FOR RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION Richard Thrasher, Coach, William Byrd High School Basketball Team, left message on voice m ail that they cannot come to Board Meeting for resolution, etc. on February 24 at 7 p.m. because of Volleyball game. They could probably get here for January 27th meeting at 7 p.m. He asked MA to call him back today about January 27th meeting. 890-3090 (school) or 890- 5984 (home). 1/27 was the original date that we asked them to come back the first of January. Since HCN said earlier that he did not want to do at January 27th meeting, called him and he suggested that we ask Mr. Thrasher to do at 4 p.m. on February 10. or wait until March. 3/10 at 4 p.m. or 3/25 at 4 p.m. WHEN MR. THRASHER RETURNS MY CALL. PLEASE TELL HIM THAT DOING IT ON 1/27 WILL RUSH US SINCE ONE LESS DAY TO WORK ON AGENDA AND THAT HCN SUGGESTED 2/10 AT 4 P.M. OR 3/10 AT 4 P.M. OR 3/2k AT 4 P.M I-2o 2.vi 4-6-w3 Tr.Q'AA__ Q, r�. I)'i-►- c r INt /LPL s t, t ilko 10) 1L 11- — 25 @ 4-oa , ct-,4,.. Z> TDB cV .fir-otetc_ tiLac 3 January 20, 1998 8:56 p.m. RE: INVITATION TO WILLIAM BYRD HIGH SCHOOL TO COME TO BOARD MEETING FOR RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION Richard Thrasher, Coach, William Byrd High School Basketball Team, left message on voice m ail that they cannot come to Board Meeting for resolution, etc. on February 24 at 7 p.m. because of Volleyball game. They could probably get here for January 27th meeting at 7 p.m. He asked MA to call him back today about January 27th meeting. 890-3090 (school) or 890- 5984 (home). 1/27 was the original date that we asked them to come back the first of January. Since HCN said earlier that he did not want to do at January 27th meeting, called him and he suggested that we ask Mr. Thrasher to do at 4 p.m. on February 10. or wait until March. 3/10 at 4 p.m. or 3/25 at 4 p.m. WHEN MR, THRASHER RETURNS MY CALL, PLEASE TELL HIM THAT DOING IT ON 1/27 WILL RUSH US SINCE ONE LESS DAY TO WORK ON AGENDA AND THAT HCN SUGGESTED 2/10 AT 4 P.M. OR 3/10 AT 4 P.M. OR 3/25 AT 4 P.M Friday, January 9, 1998 GLENVAR HS GIRLS BASKETBALL TEAM STATE CHAMPIONSHIP Called Bryan Harvey (Glenvar Elementary School - 387-6540) and invited him and his team to January 27 meeting to be recognized either at the 3 p.m. or 7 p.m. session. He is going to check his schedule because he coaches Boy's basketball and the games are always on Tuesday and will call me back on Monday (1/12) or Tuesday (1/13) and let me know when he and team can come.. He will send me a list of the players and coaches, and any other significant achievements of the teams and players. WILLIAM BYRD HIGH SCHOOL GIRLS BASKETBALL TEAM CHAMPIONSHIP Called Richard Thrasher (890-3090). Left a message for him to call me back. j_isca40/ ../z9 / f{, 1����'l d e/Atst.41 301°`: ii"1„,44.45644%°e r) • Ai w4‘.1 414 21. /04j4'1 � Ot,41-4.- CC: Brenda . ram'``' t • :� 1(J i I have a call in to both Bryan Harvey (Glenvar Gir s- asketball E---Richard Thrasher (Wm. Byrd Basketball Coach) to see if they their recognitions on: k(1./(l_u +- j/ o Coach) and can come for TUESDAY, FEB. 10 AT 4:00 P.M. (NOT 3) talked with both Harry and Spike and they thought the 4 p.m. was a good time because it is after school but does not conflict with other sports. Also, we still need the names of their team members, coaches and any achievements so we can prepare reso. Mary....1/15/98 Friday, January 9, 1998 SKETBALL TEAM STATE CHAMPIONSHIP Called Bryan Harvey (Glenvar Elementary School - 387-6540) and invited him and his team to January 27 meeting to be recognized either at the 3 p.m. or 7 p.m. session. He is going to check his schedule because he coaches Boy's basketball and the games are always on Tuesday and will call me back on Monday (1/12) or Tuesday (1/13) and let me know when he and team can come.. He will send me a list of the players and coaches, and any other significant achievements of the teams and players. WILLIAM BYRD HIGH SCHOOL GIRLS BASKETBALL TEAM CHAMPIONSHIP o e-lt; n« / 3.. 2 ,L} y Called Richard Thrasher (890-3090). Left a message for him to call me back. ..a4ca44./ dit 44414.14t eivil".#4 old Al"fr 30X: ""iitzdf544‘1 al`" G'`-camcie.a,e4t74 14 42-Y. /04.- 41-A- CC: Brenda 9 -a' a�a``� . have a call in to both Bryn Harvey (Glenvar Girls -Basketball Coach) and m. Byrd Basketball Coach) to see if they can come for their recognitions on: '—'�� q�' g �h �' $ / a a- a- act. i / TUESDAY, FEB. 10 AT 4:00 P.M. (NOT 3) I talked with both Harry and Spike and they thought the 4 p.m. was a good time because it is after school but does not conflict with other sports. Also, we still need the names of their team members, coaches and any achievements so we can prepare reso. Mary....1/15/98 • Harry Nickens Spike Harrison RE: Recognition of Glenvar and Wm. Byrd Girls Basketball Teams Just to keep you informed, we are still trying to schedule a meeting date with the coaches to recognize the basketball teams. It appears that it may be as late as March before the coaches can attend and bring some of their team members. The problem is most sports are played Tuesdays and Fridays and the players are involved in other sports which play on Tuesdays. I will let you know when we have finally scheduled a date. Mary Allen 1/26/98 RKE BOARD SUPERVISORS TEL:540-772-2193 Jan 26'98 15:50 Transmit Confirmation Report No. Receiver Transmitter Date Time Mode Pages Result II • • • • 011 NICKENS RKE BOARD SUPERVISORS Jan 26'98 15:50 00'31 Norm 01 OK RKE BOARD SUPERVISORS TEL:540-772-2193 Jan 26'98 15:27 Transmit Confirmation Report No. Receiver Transmitter Date Time Mode Pages Result • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 009 HARRISON RKE BOARD SUPERVISORS Jan 26'98 15:27 00'41 Norm 01 OK From: "Mary Allen" <ADM01/MHA> To: adm01/bjh Date sent: Wed, 18 Mar 1998 13:45:24 +0000 Subject: WM BYRD TEam Richard Thrasher called and confirmed that he and his team will be here Tuesday at 7 p.m. His final record was 29 wins and 1 loss. Mary Allen, Clerk to Board 772-2003 Brenda Holton 1 Wed, 18 Mar 1998 14:58:12 From: "Terry Harrington" <ADMOI/TLH> To: adm01/bjh Date sent: Tue, 17 Mar 1998 10:34:39 +0000 Subject: Agenda Title Brenda... Here is the tilte for the agenda item pertaining to the sign. RESOLUTION REQUESTING APPROVAL BY THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OF TWO PROPOSED WELCOME SIGNS AND A LANDSCAPED PLANTING AREA IN THE CLEARBROOK COMMUNITY WITHIN A PUBLIC RIGHT OF IN ROANOKE COUNTY. TERRY Brenda Holton — 1 Tue, 17 Mar 1998 10:36:04 PUBLIC NOTICE Please be advised that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, at its meeting on March 24, 1998, at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, will hold a public hearing and second reading on the following matter, to -wit: ORDINANCE DECLARING A PARCEL OF REAL ESTATE TO BE SURPLUS AND ACCEPTING AN OFFER FOR THE SALE OF SAME; NAMELY THE ARLINGTON HILLS #2 WELL LOT All members of the public interested in this matter may appear and be heard at the time and place aforesaid. Inquiries should be directed to Paul M. Mahoney at (540) 772-2007. Bids will be received until noon on March 20, 1998. Bids should be addressed to Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney, P.O. Box 29800, Roanoke, VA 24018. A copy of the full text of the ordinance is on file and is available for public inspection in the office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, whose office is located at 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, Virginia. Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Please publish on Sunday, March 15, 1998 Please send the invoice to: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Attention: Mary H. Allen LEGAL NOTICE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, March 24, 1998, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of the Roanoke County School Board for a Special Use Permit to allow the construction of a new elementary school, located at 5437 Crumpacker Drive, Hollins Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: March 5, 1998 Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times Tuesday, March 10, 1998 Tuesday, March 17, 1998 Direct the bill for publication to: Roanoke County School Board 5937 Cove Road NW Roanoke, VA 24019 (540) 562-3700 SEND ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANOKE, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their 7:00 p.m. session on Tuesday, March 24, 1998, in the Board Meeting Room at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive S. W. on the petition of North Roanoke Baptist Church Trustees requesting to vacate a portion of a 10-foot public utility easement located across Lots 6, 7, 8, 15, 16, 17, and 18 (tax map #27.13-3-27), Section 2, Starmount, as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 135, located in the Hollins Magisterial District A copy of the documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Engineering and Inspections, located at the Roanoke County Administration Center. Given under my hand this 2nd Day of March, 1998. Mary H. Allen, CMC, Clerk to the Board Roanoke County Board of Supervisors PLEASE PUBLISH IN THE ROANOKE TIMES ON Tuesday, March 10, 1998 Tuesday, March 17, 1998 Direct the bill for publication to: County of Roanoke Engineering & Inspections Department P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 COVER SHEET FAX To: Roanoke Times Legal Advertising Fax #: Subject: Attached Legal Notice Date: March 4, 1998 Pages: 2, including this cover sheet. COMMENTS: Attached is a legal notice from the County of Roanoke. Please advertise this on Tuesday, March 10, 1998 and Tuesday, March 17, 1998. Please direct the bill for publication as on the attached notice but forward the affidavit to: Mary Allen, Clerk to the Board Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 If you have questions, please call me at 772-2003. From the desk of... Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board County of Roanoke P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke„ VA 24018 540-772-2003 Fax: 540-772-2193 RKE BOARD SUPERVISORS TEL:5407772-2193 Mar 04'98 9:31 Transmit Confirmation Report No. Receiver Transmitter Date Time Mode Pages Result • • • • • mi • • • • • • • 005 RT—LEGAL RKE BOARD SUPERVISORS Mar 04'98 9:31 00'56 Norm 02 OK 4 MEMO To: Mary Allen, Clerk to Board of Supervisors From: Arnold Covey, Engineering and Inspections Subject: Legal Notice Date: February 27, 1998 Please advertise the following notice in The Roanoke Times: Request to vacate a portion of a 10-foot public utility easement located across Lots 6, 7, 8, 15, 16, 17, and 18 (tax map #27.13-3-27), Section 2, Starmount, as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 135, located in the Hollins Magisterial District and shown on the attached map. Thank you. PLEASE BILL: COUNTY OF ROANOKE ENGINEERING AND INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VA 24018 ./''' LEGAL NOTICE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, March 24, 1998, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of the Roanoke County Planning Commission to amend the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan by the addition of the Roanoke Valley Regional Stormwater Management Plan. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: March 5, 1998 'na-ems, 7K-1 • 6?-z,14-"I''`/ Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times Tuesday, March 10, 1998 Tuesday, March 17, 1998 Direct the bill for publication to: Roanoke County Planning Department PO Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (540) 772-2068 SEND ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANOKE, VA 24018 PUBLIC NOTICE Please be advised that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, at its meeting on March 24, 1998, at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, will hold a public hearing and second reading on the following matter, to -wit: ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 10-33. REAL ESTATE SERVICES., SECTION 10-34. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES. AND SECTION 10-36. PERSONAL AND BUSINESS SERVICE OCCUPATIONS., OF ARTICLE II. CLASSIFIED BUSINESS AND OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE PROVISIONS, OF CHAPTER 10, LICENSES, TO INCREASE THE GROSS RECEIPTS FROM $3,000.00 TO $5,000.00 FOR THE EXEMPTION FROM PAYMENT OF A LICENSE FEE All members of the public interested in this matter may appear and be heard at the time and place aforesaid. Please publish on the following dates: Tuesday, March 10, 1998 Tuesday, March 17, 1998 Please send the invoice to: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney 'f:tts prn LEGAL NOTICE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, March 24, 1998, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Graham - Thomas Corporation to rezone 9.77 acres from R-1 conditional to R-1 to construct single family residences, located at the south side of Woodhaven Road, approximately 0.5 mile east of its intersection with Green Ridge Road, in the Catawba Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: March 5, 1998 Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times Tuesday, March 10, 1998 Tuesday, March 17, 1998 Direct the bill for publication to: Graham -Thomas Corp. 494 Glenmore Dr. Salem, VA 24153 (540) 389-8193 SEND ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANOKE, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, March 24, 1998, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Ohio State Cellular Phone Co. Inc. to obtain a Special Use Permit to construct a 190 ft. self-supporting broadcast tower on a 3.171 acre parcel, located at 5585 Catawba Hospital Drive, Catawba Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: March 5, 1998 Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times Tuesday, March 10, 1998 Tuesday, March 17, 1998 Direct the bill for publication to: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors PO Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (540) 772-2005 SEND ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANOKE, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, March 24, 1998, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to rezone portions of approximately 17 acres from 1-1, C-2C, and C-2 to R-1 for public parks and recreational areas, located in the 6600 block of Merriman Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: March 5, 1998 Mary H. AI en, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times Tuesday, March 10, 1998 Tuesday, March 17, 1998 Direct the bill for publication to: Roanoke County Parks & Recreation 1206 Kessler Mill Rd Salem, VA 24153 (540) 387-6078 SEND ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 29800, ROANOKE, VA 24018 ACTION NO. r-, ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 24, 1998 N AGENDA ITEM: Bu • • et Presentations on jJie Upcoming Annual Budget for FY 1998-99. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S CO TS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: T ' , time has be - i set aside for presentations to allow social service, human service, tourism and cultural ag v cies the oppo : ty to orally submit funding requests to the Board of Supervisors for inclusion in the FY " '98-99 budget. Thiwork session format will allow a more focused presentation that will benefit the Bo rd members and the r- uesting agencies. Please find attached an updated listi FY97-98 approved budget, and the presentations. The "proposed" make recommendations for fun budget that is planned for submit by each organization has been p Respectfully submitted, Brent Robertson Budget Manager of organizational requests rganizations' funding request nding column has not been com ng and present them to the Boar in April. The written requests an ced in the Clerk to the Board's office hat include prior years' actual payments, or FY98-99 for your review during the eted. The County Administrator will s part of the FY1998-99 proposed ccompanying literature submitted or review. Approved by, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION Approved () Motion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Harrison Johnson McNamara Minnix Nickens VOTE No Yes Abs Niy► /)arse req ues/-& Cont 1 _Of S Human Service Agency Adult Care Center of the Roanoke Valley Alzheimer's Association Association for Retarded Citizens (ARC) Bethany Hall Big Brothers and Big Sisters of Roanoke Valley Blue Ridge Regional Education and Training Council Bradley Free Clinic Child Abuse Prevention Council of Roanoke Valley Child Health Investment Partnership (CHIP) Conflict Resolution Caster, Inc. Council of Community Services - Information and Referral Center Court Appointed Special Advocate (CASA) Family Service of the Roanoke Valley Fifth District Employment & Training Consortium Smith Mountain Lake 4H Camp Goodwill Industries Tinker Mountain Habitat for Humanity League of Older Americans (LOA) Literacy Volunteer Program National Multiple Sclerosis Society Roanoke Area Ministries Roanoke Valley Drug and Alcohol Abuse Council Roanoke Valley Speedy & Hearing Center Salem/Roanoke County Community Food Pantry The Salvation Army TRUST Total Contributions 500 500 500 0 2,500 2,500 0 0 0 6,500 6,500 6,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 16,660 16,660 16,660 0 0 0 3,000 3,000 3,000 1,053 2,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 4,000 3,000 3,500 3,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 5,000 5,000 5,000 0 0 0 12,500 13,750 13,750 0 1,000 1,000 0 0 0 2,000 2,000 2,000 0 1,000 1,000 500 1,000 1,000 0 0 0 2,000 2,000 2,000 5,500 5,500 5,500 1998-99 Request 1998-99 Approved $12,480 $2,500 15,000 0 3,000 3,466 6,500 3,500 21,600 0 7,470 5,000 5,000 11,730 0 11,200 22,000 22,688 1,000 1,000 2,500 2,000 1,000 8,000 3,500 6,000 $82,213 $92,910 $95,910 $178,134 $0 WORKSESS\Contrb99 Human Services County of Roanoke Contributions to Social Service and Cultural Agencies FY 1998-99 Requests Social/Cultural Agency 1995-96 Actual 1996-97 Actual 1997-98 Budget 1998-99 Request 1998-99 Approved Health and Social Services Blue Ridge Community Services $79,332 $79,332 $79,332 $108,204 TAP 25,000 30,000 30,000 35,101 TAP -Transitional Living Center 15,000 17,500 17,500 22,017 $119,332 $126,832 $126,832 $165,322 $0 Cultural Enrichment / Tourism Alonzo Stagg Bowl $2,500 $2,500 $2,500 $2,500 Art Museum of Western Virginia 2,000 2,000 2,000 6,100 Arts Council of the Blue Ridge 3,000 3,000 3,000 4,000 Center in the Square: Operating 50,000 50,000 50,000 60,000 Capital 0 0 0 12,000 Explore (The River Foundation) 150,000 160,000 160,000 0 Julian Stanley Wise Museum(25,000/yr. for 3 yrs.) 0 12,500 25,000 35,000 Mill Mountain Theatre 8,500 8,500 8,500 12,200 Mill Mountain Zoo: Operating 6,000 8,000 8,000 10,000 Capital 10,000 10,000 10,000 22,000 Sister -City Pavilion 10,000 0 0 0 Opera Roanoke 0 0 0 800 Roanoke Symphony 7,500 7,500 7,500 10,000 Roanoke Valley History Museum 6,350 7,500 7,500 7,800 Salem Museum / Salem Historical Society 0 0 0 0 Science Museum: Operating 25,000 25,000 25,000 72,000 Capital 20,000 20,000 20,000 80,000 Transportation Museum: Operating 10,000 10,000 10,000 15,000 Capital 0 2,000 2,000 10,000 Vinton Dogwood Festival 500 500 500 1,000 $311,350 $329,000 $341,500 $360,400 $0 Other League of Women Voters 275 300 0 0 Ms. Virginia Senior Citizen Pageant 100 100 100 0 Miss Virginia Pageant 500 500 500 500 National D-Day Memorial Foundation ($25,000/year for 10 years) 0 10,000 10,000 230,000 OUTLOOK Downtown Roanoke 0 1,000 1,000 0 Roanoke Valley Greenways Coordinator 0 21,600 10,800 11,100 VA Westem Community College Scholarship Fund 5,274 5,339 5,338 5,360 Handicapped Access 0 0 0 59,892 Construction Student Activities Center-3rd yr. 13,527 13,527 0 0 Site Development - Water Retention and Facility and Parking Improvements 66,379 0 22,870 31,033 Westem Virginia Land Trust 0 0 0 25,000 $86,055 $52,366 $50,608 $362,885 $0 Total Contributions $516,737 $508,198 $518,940 $888,607 $0 worksess\ Contrb99 Social & Cultural County of Roanoke Dues and Per Capita Allocations FY 1998-99 Requests 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1998-99 Agency Actual Actual Budget Request Approved Blue Ridge Soil and Conservation District 1,000 1,250 1,250 1,500 Convention and Visitors Bureau - Operating 107,500 107,500 107,500 165,000 Economic Development Partnership 107,500 107,500 107,500 112,185 Fifth Planning District Commission 21,900 29,160 29,654 29,654 National Association of Counties 1,557 1,557 1,557 1,557 National Civic League 200 200 200 200 Roanoke Regional Chamber of Commerce 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 Salem/Roanoke County Chamber of Commerce 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 Roanoke Valley Sister Cities 1,000 3,000 0 3,000 Tour Dupont 5,000 7,500 0 0 Vinton Chamber of Commerce 100 100 100 500 Virginia Amateur Sports 35,000 35,000 35,000 40,000 Virginia Association of Counties 13,855 13,855 13,940 13,940 Virginia Institute of Government 5,000 0 0 0 Virginia Municipal League 15,245 16,006 16,806 16,806 Total $323,357 $331,128 $322,007 $392,842 $0 WORKSESSN\ Contrb99 Dues & Per Capita Bob L. Johnson, Chairman Arthur M. Whittaker, Sr., Vice -Chairman J. Granger Macfarlane Claude N. Smith James M. Turner, Jr. Jacqueline L. Shuck, Executive Director March 11, 1998 Honorable Chairman and Members Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 5202 Aviation Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24012-1148 (540) 362-1999 FAX (540) 563-4838 ROANOKE REGIONAL AIRFORT Re: Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Fiscal Year 1998-99 Budget and Proposed Capital Expenditures Dear Gentlemen: In accordance with the requirements of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Act, and the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Contract dated January 28, 1987, as amended, submitted for your approval is the Airport Commission's 1998-99 proposed Operating and Capital Purchase Budget (Attachment I), as well as a separate listing of a proposed capital expenditure (Attachment II) which is expected to exceed $100,000 and is intended to benefit five or more future accounting periods. This budget was adopted by the Commission at its March 11, 1998 meeting. The Commission has been advised by bond counsel that formal approval of the budget by resolution of each of the participating political subdivisions would be appropriate. The capital expenditure list also requires formal approval. I will be pleased to respond to any questions or comments that you may have with regard to this matter. On behalf of the Commission, thank you very much for your help and cooperation. Very truly yours, Jacqueline L. Shuck Executive Director Enclosures cc: Chairman and Members, Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Mark Allan Williams, General Counsel, Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Paul M. Mahoney, Roanoke County Attorney Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk, Roanoke County Board of Supervisors csp030498.h Comm \98councn.Itr � 1 .3-Feh-98 ATTACHMENT I ROANOKEREGTONACA FOR YEAR 1998-99 BUDGET CommBudg98-99 1997-98 Budgeted 1998-99 Budgeted EXPENSE BUDGET Expenditures Expenditures 1. Operations and Maintenance Expenses A. Salaries, Wages and Benefits $1,755,390 $1,825,253 B. Operating Expenditures 1,995,760 2,076,009 C. Other Projects 70,000 126,100 Total Operations and Maintenance 3,821,150 4,027,362 2. Non -Operating Expenses A. Interest 527,225 503,511 B. Debt Service 317,581 339,032 Total Non -Operating 844,806 842,543 3. Capital Expenses A. Capital Projects and Purchases 160,530 101,390 B. Multi -Year Projects 0 168,500 Total Capital Expenses 160,530 269,890 Total Budgeted Expenditures $4,826,486 $5,139,795 1997-98 Budgeted 1998-99 Budgeted REVENUE PROJECTIONS Projected Revenues Projected Revenues 1. Operating Revenues A. Airfield $1,003,897 $1,127,324 B. General Aviation 112,194 132,195 C. Terminal Related 3,333,031 3,949,914 D. Other Revenues 225,313 228,023 Total Projected Operating Revenues 4,674,435 5,437,456 2. Non -Operating Revenues A. Interest from Debt Service 46,000 48,000 B. Interest on Investments 400,000 370,000 Total Projected Non -Operating Revenues 446,000 418,000 Total Projected Revenue $5,120,435 $5,855,456 ATTACHMENT II Proposed Capital Expenditures (For projects expected to exceed $100,000 in cost and intended to benefit five or more accounting periods) A. Projects 1. Construct Overflow Parking Lot a.) Description: Construct 300-350 vehicle overflow, surface parking lot across Aviation Drive from airport terminal building. b.) Justification: During holidays, spring break and other heavy travel times, the current public parking lots are filled and some cars are required to park in the grass field across the street. The new overflow lot is proposed in order to avoid losing customers and to delay the need to expend funds for the construction of a parking deck. Estimated Cost: $400,000.00 B. Funding Sources Federal AIP Grant Funds -0- State Aviation Grant Funds -0- Commission Funds 400,000.00 City and County Funds -0- Estimated Total Project Funding $400,000.00 csp030598.h Comm\attachIl.bgt RESOLUTION OF THE ROANOKE REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION Adopted this llth day of March 1998 No. 03-031198 A RESOLUTION approving and adopting the Commission's Operating and Capital Purchase Budget for fiscal year 1998-99. BE IT RESOLVED by the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission that the fiscal year 1998-99 Operating and Capital Purchase Budget for the Commission as set forth in the report and accompanying attachment by the Executive Director dated March 11, 1998, is hereby approved; BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Executive Director is authorized on behalf of the Commission to submit the fiscal year 1998-99 Operating and Capital Purchase Budget, as well as a list of Proposed Capital Expenditures, to the Roanoke City Council and the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors for approval pursuant to the contract between the Commission, Roanoke City and Roanoke County dated January 28, 1987, as amended. ATTEST: Secreta AYES: Macfarlane, Smith, Turner, Whittaker, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: None 02 &tdzt__ MEMO To: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Board of Supervisors From: George W. Simpson, III, P.E. Assistant Director of Engineering and Inspections • Date: March 5, 1998 Subject: Stotiuwater Management Citizen's Advisory Committee There currently exists a vacancy on the Citizen's Advisory Committee for Stotuiwater Management. Please advise the Board of Supervisors that we would like to have a citizen appointed to this committee who would be willing to serve in an advisory capacity in our efforts to implement the Roanoke Valley Regional Stormwater Management Plan. I would like to respectfully offer the name of recent board member Lee Eddy for consideration by the Board of Supervisors. Mr. Eddy is quite knowledgeable about past efforts in the area of stormwater management and has expressed an interest in serving in this capacity. Thank you. TO: Members of the Board of Supervisors I will add the above vacancy under Appointments on the March 24 agenda. As you will note, Mr. Simpson is suggesting that Lee Eddy be appointed to the Committee and Mr. Eddy has indicated his willingness to serve. Mary Allen March 10, 1998 CC: Elmer Hodge March 5, 1998 (1:04pm) NOTE TO: Mary Allen FROM: Brenda J. Holton SUBJECT: stormwater management advisory committee Mr. Eddy came by and asked if George Simpson had gotten in touch with you or me about appointing Mr. Eddy to the Stormwater Management Advisory Committee. He told Mr. Eddy that he wanted to do this. He was just asking. He also wanted to know when we were going to change the Board pictures. I told him that we were in the process and working on it. INTER OFF ICE MEMO To: Elmer Hodge, County Administrator From: Timothy W. Gubala, Director of Economic Development \k VA Subject: Request for work session for discussion of Economic Development Strategy Date: March 9, 1998 I have received comments from you and Anne -Marie regarding the draft of the Economic Development State agenda item for eith would give the Bo comments are receive • , • • . • and adopt it with a resolution. Please advise. t e Marc d a better o . I propose that we include it as a work session or April 14 Board meeting. This type of forum unity to interact and comment. Once lace on the next agenda as a new business item