Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/13/1998 - Regular~~~~~ C~aix~#~ .~~ ~a~tz~~~e NG DOCUMENT-SUBJECT TO /iEV/S/ON ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION AGENDA OCTOBER 13, 1998 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. THERE IS A PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULED THIS EVENING AT 7.00 P M Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement in order to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings or other programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County, please contact the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772-2005. We request that you provide at least 48-hours notice so that proper arrangements may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call ALL PRESENT AT 3:00 P.M. 2. Invocation: The Reverend John Hartwig Good Shepherd Lutheran Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS JPM -REQUESTED AND RECEIVED BOARD CONSENSUS TO MOVE BOARD COMMENTS TO THE END OF THE AGENDA TODAY AND ALSO IN THE FUTURE. HCN - ADDED TWO EXECUTIVE SESSION ITEMS ON SALE OF REAL ESTATE AND PROBABLE LITIGATION. i ® Recycled Paper C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Presentation from the American Federation of Musicians to the Roanoke County Parks and Recreation Department for their assistance at VALLEYFEST Music Festival held at Green Hill Park in August. (Adrian Willis, President of the American Federation of Musicians. PRESENTED TO PETE HAISLIP AND EDDIE FORD 2. Presentation of $5,000 donation to Roanoke County by the Marine Corps from proceeds of the Third Annual Mud Run at Green Hill Park. (Captain Ted Adams, U. S. Marines) CHECK PRESENTED TO BLJ PETE HAISLIP AND RICKY SHOWALTER. RICKY SHOWALTER UPDATED BOARD ON IMPROVEMENTS AT CAMP ROANOKE. D. BRIEFINGS NONE E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request for appropriation of $22,790 to the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, for final cost share payment for Matthews Electroplating Superfund remediation project. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) A-101398-1 FFH MOTION TO APPROVE $22,790 APPROPRIATION FROM BOARD CONTINGENCY FUND. URC 2. Approval and authorization of the execution of the Consent Decree with the United States of America on 2 behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act in connection with the Palmerton Zinc Pile Superfund Site. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) A-101398-2 FFH MOTION TO APPROVE EXECUTION OF CONSENT DECREE URC F. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. First reading of ordinance authorizing quitclaim and release of a water and sanitary sewer easement within the cul-de-sac of Otter Park Court and located between Lot 8, Block 2, Section 3 and Tract A-1, Block 2, Section 3 of the Groves, in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. (Arnold Covey, Director of Community Development) HOM MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND READING -10127/98 URC 2. First reading of ordinance to vacate a 6-foot portion of a 60-foot unimproved right-of-way referred to as Thomas Drive as recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 179, located in the Catawba Magisterial District. (Arnold Covey, Director of Community Development) FFH MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND READING AND PH - 10/27/98 URC 3. First reading of ordinance enacting Sections 10-9.1, 2 3, and 4 in Article I of Chapter 10 Licenses of the Roanoke County Code to incorporate and conform with recent General Assembly legislation regarding limitation on gross receipts for pari-mutual wagering, real estate brokers, providers of funeral services, and staffing firms for business, professional and occupational license tax purposes. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 3 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND READING AND PUBLIC HEARING -10/27/98 URC G. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES H. APPOINTMENTS 1. Building Code Board of Adjustment and Appeals 2. Grievance Panel 3. League of Older Americans -Advisory Council JPM ASKED IF THERE WERE VOLUNTEERS WILLING TO SERVE. BLJ ASKED MHA TO SEND LETTER OF APPRECIATION TO DEE PINCOCK. 4. New Century Venture Center Board of Directors 5. Task Force for Senior and Physically Challenged Citizens I. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. R-101398- 3 HOM MOTION TO ADOPT CONSENT RESO URC 1. Approval of Minutes for August 18, 1998. 2. Confirmation of committee appointment to the Grievance Panel. A-101398-3.a 4 3. Resolution requesting the acceptance of new portions of Old Cave Spring Road, Crystal Creek Drive, Pleasant Hill Drive to the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System; and abandonment of those portions of the above roads and Route 221 (Brambleton Avenue, Bent Mountain Road) which no longer serve public need. R-101398-3. b 4. Resolution requesting the acceptance of new portions of Valley Forge Avenue, Concord Place, Bunker Hill Drive, Valley Forge Circle to the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System, and abandonment of those portions of the above roads which no longer serve public need. R-101398-3.c 5. Resolution requesting the acceptance of new portions of West River Road and Dry Hollow Road to the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System, and abandonment of those portions of the above roads which no longer serve public need. R-101398-3.d 6. Resolution requesting the acceptance of Starlight Lane to the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System and abandonment of those portions of the above road which no longer serves public need. R-101398-3.e J. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS NONE K. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS NONE L. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS 5 NONE M. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS MOVED TO LAST ITEM DURING EVENING SESSION N. REPORTS BLJ MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE - UVV 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Future School Capital Reserve 5. Proclamations signed by the Chairman 6. Statement of Treasurer's Accountability per investments and Portfolio Policy as of September 30, 1998. O. WORK SESSIONS (4TH FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM) 1. Work Session with Rescue Chiefs concerning charging for EMS Calls HELD FROM 4:45 TO 5.45 PRESENTED BY JOE COYLE AND LEE BIBB RESCUE CHIEFS RESCUE CHIEFS WILL SUPPORT FLAT TAX OR TELEPHONE TAX BUT NOT CHARGING FOR EMS CALLS. BOARD CONSENSUS THAT ECH, RICK BURCH TO WORK WITH RESCUE CHIEFS AND BRING BACK PLAN THAT CAN BE IMPLEMENTED IN NEXT BUDGET PROCESS. 2. Six Year Secondary System Construction Plan for fiscal year 1999-2005 and review of Revenue Sharing Priority List for 1999-2000. HELD FROM 5:45 TO 6:10 P M 6 PRESENTED BY ARNOLD COVEY. BOARD CONSENSUS TO APPROVE PROPOSED POLICY FOR "WATCH FOR CHILDREN" SIGN WITH REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT WITH CITIZENS PAYING 100% OF COST VDOT WILL MAKE FINAL DETERMINATION. P. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A(3) SALE OF REAL ESTATE, WELL LOT; 201-344 A (7) PENDING LITIGATION REGARDING HOME DEPOT REZONING. BLJ MOTION TO GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION AT 3:40 P.M. URC EXECUTIVE SESSION HELD FROM 3.40 TO 4.45 P M 1WORK SESSIONS HELD AFTER EXECUTIVE SESSIONS EVENING SESSION X7.00 P M~ Q. CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION R-101398- BLJ MOTION THAT BOARD RETURNED TO OPEN SESSION AT 4:45 P.M. AND ADOPT CERTIFICATION RESO URC R. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Second reading of ordinance to rezone approximately 20 acres from R-1, R-2 and C-2 conditional to C-1 and C-2, General commercial, for the purpose of general retail and service uses (Home Depot), located in the vicinity of Brambleton Avenue (Route 221) and Electric Road (Route 419), Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. (Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator) 37 CITIZENS SPOKE 0-101398-5 HCN MOTION TO ADOPT ORD WITH CONDITION "H" AMENDED BY JPM AYES-FFH, HCN, BLJ NAYS-JPM, HOM S. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Second reading of ordinance to exercise an option with Kenneth Keeney and Catherine Keeney to purchase approximately 0.254 acres on Westmoreland Avenue in connection with an economic development project located off Routes 419 and 221. (Joyce Waugh, Assistant Director of Economic Development) 0-101398-6 HOM MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC T. CITIZEN COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS 1. Barbara Bushnell explained that both the Board of Supervisors and School Board endorsed the Blue Ribbon Committee recommendation for two small schools in South County Asked if Board still supported a small school Board members advised the supported small school concept but did not have enough information to support a specific site 2. Nancv Hughes asked the Board members what they had done in the past week towards completion of the South County High School. U. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS 1. Supervisor Minnix• (1) Thanked Richard Baldwin for his letter expressing concerns about access to and from Westmoreland and asked to be kept informed ~2) Advised that a citizen asked about recvclina costs and he thought there was a payback from recycles newspapers. BLJ responded it was not cost effective to recycle newspaper at this time but may be in the future 2. Supervisor Nickens• (1) Suggested that Mr Baldwin serve on the Home Depot Advisory Committee (2) Noted that there is a tax on movies at theaters but none when videos are rented. Asked staff to look at the possibility of a short term rental tax for the next budget process. (3) Attended the funeral for Darnall Vinyard and advised that he served on the IDA for 25 years and donated 86 acres of parkland to the Countv. Mr. Vinyard recently noted that for years to come the parkland will be used by young people Suggested that the Countv recognize him in some way by a presentation to his wife HOM also advised that Parks and Recreation employee William Harbor passed away. 3. Supervisor McNamara felt that the Home Depot issue reached closure tonight even though it was unfortunate period in the Countv. He emphasized that it would be counterproductive NOT to shoo at Home Depot because Countv needs to support increased tax revenue opportunities V. ADJOURNMENT 9 ~ pOAN ,F~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ o z a 1838 (~.~ix~#g ~# ~~~x~o~~e ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA r~ur c~ n~ etue xmrg (^ _ a~ axovrr OCTOBER 13, 1998 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. THERE /S A PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULED THIS EVENING AT 7:00 P.M. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement in order to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings or other programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County, please contact the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772-2005. We request that you provide at least 48-hours notice so that proper arrangements may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call 2. Invocation: The Reverend John Hartwig Good Shepherd Lutheran Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Presentation from the American Federation of Musicians to the Roanoke County Parks and Recreation Department for their assistance at VALLEYFEST Music Festival held at Green Hill Park in August. (Adrian Willis, President of the American Federation of Musicians. i ® Recyded Paper 2. Presentation of $5,000 donation to Roanoke County by the Marine Corps from proceeds of the Third Annual Mud Run at Green Hill Park. (Captain Ted Adams, U. S. Marines) D. BRIEFINGS E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request for appropriation of $22,790 to the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, for final cost share payment for Matthews Electroplating Superfund remediation project. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 2. Approval and authorization of the execution of the Consent Decree with the United States of America on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act in connection with the Palmerton Zinc Pile Superfund Site. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) F. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. First reading of ordinance authorizing quitclaim and release of a water and sanitary sewer easement within the cul-de-sac of Otter Park Court and located between Lot 8, Block 2, Section 3 and Tract A-1, Block 2, Section 3 of the Groves, in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. (Arnold Covey, Director of Community Development) 2. First reading of ordinance to vacate a 6-foot portion of a 60-foot unimproved right-of-way referred to as Thomas Drive as recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 179, located in the Catawba Magisterial District. (Arnold Covey, Director of Community Development) 3. First reading of ordinance enacting Sections 10-9.1, 2 3, and 4 in Article I of Chapter 10 Licenses of the Roanoke County Code to incorporate and conform with recent 2 Y General Assembly legislation regarding limitation on gross receipts for pari-mutual wagering, real estate brokers, providers of funeral services, and staffing firms for business, professional and occupational license tax purposes. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) G. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES H. APPOINTMENTS 1. Building Code Board of Adjustment and Appeals 2. Grievance Panel 3. League of Older Americans -Advisory Council 4. New Century Venture Center Board of Directors 5. Task Force for Senior and Physically Challenged Citizens I. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT A ENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Approval of Minutes for August 18, 1998. 2. Confirmation of committee appointment to the Grievance Panel. 3. Resolution requesting the acceptance of new portions of Old Cave Spring Road, Crystal Creek Drive, Pleasant Hill Drive to the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System; and abandonment of those portions of the above roads and Route 221 (Brambleton Avenue, Bent Mountain Road) which no longer serve public need. 3 4. Resolution requesting the acceptance of new portions of Valley Forge Avenue, Concord Place, Bunker Hill Drive, Valley Forge Circle to the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System, and abandonment of those portions of the above roads which no longer serve public need. 5. Resolution requesting the acceptance of new portions of West River Road and Dry Hollow Road to the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System, and abandonment of those portions of the above roads which no longer serve public need. 6. Resolution requesting the acceptance of Starlight Lane to the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System and abandonment of those portions of the above road which no longer serves public need. J. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS K. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS L. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS M. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS N. REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Future School Capital Reserve 5. Proclamations signed by the Chairman 6. Statement of Treasurer's Accountability per investments and Portfolio Policy as of September 30, 1998. 4 r O. WORK SESSIONS (4TH FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM) 1. Work Session with Rescue Chiefs concerning charging for EMS Calls 2. Six Year Secondary System Construction Plan for fiscal year 1999-2005 and review of Revenue Sharing Priority List for 1999-2000. P. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A EVENING SESSION (7:007:00 P.M.) Q. CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION R. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Second reading of ordinance to rezone approximately 20 acres from R-1, R-2 and C-2 conditional to C-1 and C-2, General commercial, for the purpose of general retail and service uses (Home Depot), located in the vicinity of Brambleton Avenue (Route 221) and Electric Road (Route 419), Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. (Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator) S. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Second reading of ordinance to exercise an option with Kenneth Keeney and Catherine Keeney to purchase approximately 0.254 acres on Westmoreland Avenue in connection with an economic development project located off Routes 419 and 221. (Joyce Waugh, Assistant Director of Economic Development) T. CITIZEN COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS U. ADJOURNMENT ACTION N0. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 13, 1998 AGENDA ITEM: Presentations from the American Federation of Musicians to the Roanoke County Parks and Recreation Department for their assistance at VALLEYFEST held at Green Hill Park on August 22, 1998 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: On August 22 at Green Hill Park, The American Federation of Musicians, the Recording Industry of Music Performance Trust Fund and the Roanoke County Parks and Recreation sponsored an alt day music festival. The American Federation of Musicians annually presents an award to a locality for their support of music. This year, they would like to present the award to the Roanoke County Parks and Recreation Department for their support of the festival at Green Hill Park. They would also like to recognize Eddie Ford of the Parks and Recreation Department for his assistance during the festival. Adrian Willis, President of the Federation, will make the presentation to Parks and Recreation Director Pete Haislip and to Eddie Ford. Respectfully Submitted by: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE No. Yes Abs Approved () Motion by: Harrison _ _ Denied () Johnson _ _ _ Received () McNamara_ _ _ Referred () Minnix _ _ _ To () Nickens ~~ ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~ -' c~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 13, 1998 AGENDA ITEM: Presentation of a check for $5,000 to Roanoke County by the Marine Corps from proceeds of the Third Annual Mud Run at Green Hill Park. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: CZ;~i,,r«,r, o''+''•(' /!ws `~w~rwr ~DO • uoo+ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The local United States Marine Corps, Company B, 4~'' Combat Engineer Battalion ran the 3"' Annual Mud Run at Roanoke County's Green Hill Park on Saturday September 19, 1998. The event was developed by Marine Captain Adams to raise money and awareness for Camp Roanoke and Toys for Tots. I am happy to announce that this year the Marines will present a check for $5,000 towards the renovation of Camp Roanoke. This is the third year of the program, and total cash donations to date exceed $9,000. This is also the same group who, this summer, made major site improvements to the Camp valued at over $200,000. The Mud Run has grown to one of the most popular running events in the Roanoke Valley. This year 1,039 runners participated, in ages ranging from 3 years old to the 70's. In addition over 4,000 spectators packed Green Hill Park to watch this family event. Over 120 Marines worked the event including 30 retirees and their wives. Major sponsors included WSLS Channel 10, K92, Kroger, and Coke. FISCAL IMPACT: $5,000 to the Camp Roanoke renovation fund. Respectfully submitted, ~°ezcJ ~ ~ m ~. Pete Haislip Director, Parks and Recreation Approved by, ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator r ~ .~ > . Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: McNamara Harrison Johnson Minnix Nickens C-a VOTE No Yes Abs ., A-101398-1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 13, 1998 AGENDA ITEM: Appropriation of $22,790 to the Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Environmental Quality, for final cost share payment for Matthews Electroplating SuperFund remediation project COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Recommend approval SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This appropriation closes out a SuperFund remediation project at the Matthews Electroplating site that occurred in Roanoke County in the early 1980s. The Matthews Electroplating facility released and discharged heavy metals (chromium) into the groundwater. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) determined that the remedy for this environmental problem was to supply public water to this portion of the County with contaminated wells. At the County's request this remediation was expanded to better serve the County's long range plans for public water service in the western portion of the County. EPA has finally completed its financial reconciliation of this remedial action, and has determined that a balance of $22,790 remains to be paid. The attached correspondence from the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) summarizes the history of this project. Also attached are copies of a letter dated November 29, 1983, from the County to EPA, DEQ and the Corps of Engineers committing the County to paying for the costs of engineering and construction associated with enlarging the proposed water system extension to this area, and of a May 10, 1984, letter from the County to DEQ confirming that the County has allocated $300,000 for its share of the costs of this project. Finance Department has reviewed County payment records, and has determined that the County has paid $200,000 to the Commonwealth of Virginia for this project. FISCAL IMPACTS: Appropriation of $22,790 from the Board's contingency fund. 1 ~- r STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board appropriate $22,790 to DEQ to complete the financial reconciliation for this project. Respectfully submitted, ~r t Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney ---------------------- ------------------------------------------------- ACTION ----------------------- -------------------- VOTE No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by: Fenton F. Harrison to ap prove Johnson _ x _ Denied () ~~~ 790 appropriation from Board Harrison _ x Received () Contin~enc~ Fund McNamara- x Referred () Minnix _ x To () Nickens _ x _ cc: File Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance 2 5 LIIIIY[f1J IIf i~IIM1tII~iP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS November 29, 1983 Mr. Eric Johnson U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Region III 6th and Walnut Streets Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106 Mr. Hans J. Mueller, P. E. Director Bureau of Solid Waste Management 109 Governor Street Richmond, Virginia 23219 Mr. R. W. Kelley, P. E. Chief, Special Projects Office Engineering Division Omaha District Corps of Engineers 6014 U. S. Post Office and Courthouse Omaha, Nebraska 68102 Re Gentlemen: I MAY W. JOHNSON. CHAIRMA\ CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKEN S. VICi CHAIRM4N VINTON MA GIHTERIAL DISTRICT ATHENA E. BU RTOI~~ WINDSOR MILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT GARY J. MINTER HO LLINH MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ROBERT E. MYERS CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT DONALD R. FLANDERS COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ----~., . ~, ~`~ -t _~~? .:; ; . . - =; Matthews Electroplating Site- Water Line As you are aware, Roanoke County has been considering the possibility of increasing the line size and capacity of the proposed water system extension to the Matthews Electroplating area. This increase would provide for the future anticipated water demand in the area. The County feels that it is in the best interest of the citizens of Roanoke County, economically and socially, to plan for future demands in this area. With this proposal, Roanoke County understands that additional engineering and construction costs will be associated with the enlargement of the project and that we will be required to fund the costs associated with such a change. We wish to assure you that it is our intention to pay for the engineering and c~,nstruction costs assoc~sted with the enlargement, along with the 10% loca~. match previously provided by Roanoke County. Mr. Eric Johnson Mr. Hans J. Mueller Mr. R. W. Kelley ~I' Page 2 November 29, 1983 The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors wishes to express their appreciation for the cooperation that your offices have shown in helping us provide the citizens of Roanoke County the most economical solution to the problems facing all of us. We thank you for all your efforts. Sincerely, 1V1ay dG. n, Chairman • Roanoke County Board of Supervisors ~~i Donald R. Flan ers County Administrator JRH:wr ~-- O~ ROANp~~ - ~` ~ ,~. . 2 838 May 10, 1984 Mr. Berry Wright, Director Division of HazardousWastes State Health Department 109 Governor Street Richmond, Virginia 23219 ~- ~ DONALD R. FLANDERS COUNTY AOMINIHTRATOR Re: Matthews Electroplating EPA Superfund Roanoke County Dear Mr. Wright: This letter is to allocated and assigned for the County's share project; the County's the project plus the a~ line sizes. confirm that the County of Roanoke has capital funds in the amount of $300,000 of the cost of the above referenced share being the 10 percent local share of 3ditional estimated costs for enlarging the I hope this certification will be beneficial. Sin e ely, X2345 , .. ~_~b ~o~' ~ ~ Donald R. Flanders ~Q~ ~ ~4~~ ry j County Administrator ~ a N ~$1tJ~~~ ,w ohn M. Chambliss, Jr. Superintendent of Fiscal Management JRH: wr k1 ~ . P. O. BOX 3800 ROANOKE. VIRGINIA 24015 (703) 772-2004 OCT, -0" 98 (WED1 16~ 03 DEQ TELL 804698~23~ P. 002 :o ~CI~~~N~~~.g.~'~ Of ~~l~C,~~1VIA Jamcs s. Gilmore, III D~-p~TMENT OF PNVIRONMEI~P'7'HL QUALITY Governor Street Qddress: b29 East Main Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219 Melling address: P.O. Box 10009 ~ Richmond, Virginia 23240 Cohn Pwl VlJoodlcy,lr. Fax {804) 498-4300 TDD (804) b98-4021 Seeretery of N'aturai Resources http:/iwww,deq.btato.raus Mr. P.itner C. Hodge County Administrator Roanoke County P. O. Box 29$00 Roanoke, YA 24018 Dear Mr. Hodge: ~"-/ pcruiis H. Troacy Director (804) 69E~000 1-800-592-5482 The Departmer,~t of F.,nvironmentai Qua4ty ~eceived yourAugust 21, 1997 reply to the Department's May 30, 199? letter regarding a U.S, Environmratal protection Agency EPA) request for the final co;~t-share paynunt for the Matthews Flectroplat~ing water supply project. There mmy be soma oo~nfusion about the history of this project since so much time bas passed since it was completed. Your August letter referred to a 1983 resolution which committed Roanoke County to pa,y the local cost-share for the project, not to exceed ~?0,000. Originally, in 1983, the project was ~~timated to cost 5700,000. ;The cost-share would have been 570,000. The caurrty forwarded to the state a check for this amouttt in 1963. in 1985 at the Request of the county, the project was expanded to fit with the cauaty's long-terra water servia~ planning. (See May 1984 ~equest and January 1985 contract amendrncnt attacbod.) The cost of the expanded project was e~ated to be 51,394,760. The couzaty's share of project costs was estimated to be 5222,411, ~ the county agreed to fully fund the cost of project expansion (See 1983 contract ameadtneat attached.) The coulriy forwarded a aecc-nd check to the state for S 13fl,000 in 1985. EPA recently r~raliud that the final bill for t>~e project was not sent after all project costs were tabulated. The 6uaal local cost shares is 5222,790, so 522,790 is still owed to EPA. (See copy of June 1996 con~espondence attached.) PI review your rocords again and if you concur with the findings, please send a check, made out to the T'reasw~er of the Commonwealth of Vurginia, to this ageiic~• for the requested asnouat. , An Agency of the NQtura! ~esaurt:es S¢crtrtariat OCT,-Q''98lWED) 16:03 DEQ TEL:8a~698~?3~ F. 003 Mr, Elmer C. Hodge Page Two ~ I i if you ,~ any further inforrnatian regar . ~ this matter, please contact Erica Dameron, Office Director, OfFice of Remediation Prugrarns (804) 698-4201. Sincerely, I r ~~~lr! H8.988r1'Velnll Directtor, Waste Programs Enclosures C-`I cc: Kathleen O'Connell Joha Fly Erica S. Dameron OC'f, -tl1' 99 (WED) 16:01 DEQ TEL. 804698234 P, 011 _ REt:ONCILIATION AND TERPiINATION AMENDMENT • SQPERFIIND STATE CONTRACT MATT8EW8 BLECTROpLATING SITE C01~4IONWEALTH ~ OF VIRGINIA DE:DARTHENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QU~ILITY AND t'HE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY E-/ The tormin~iti,on of this Supe=fund State Contract ("Contract"~ is effective this i day of by and between t:he Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of ~ Environmental Quality (~~pgQn~, and the United States of America, Environmental PY-otection Agency ("EPA"), I Whereas, EFTA and DEQ acknowledge that all phases of remedial action, inczudir~g final inspection, have been satisfactorily completed at the; Matthews Electroplating Site, and Whereas, the remedial action 'the remedial action Interagency Agreement has been closed, and Wheretls, reconciliation of the total amount expended regarding this contract is summarized below: I EstiAlate (SSC) Final Cost Construction COST $ 1, 02,610 10•°s State Cost SJ7are $ 130 261 S 1,30E,401 ~ $ 130,640 Reconciliation: Amount Paid by DEQ 10'7 , 6 5 0, Balance Due to EPA (final billing) $ 22 X90 In Witness thereof, EPA and DEQ have executed this Reconciliation a~.d Termination Azaandment to request payment from the commonwealth of Virginia actor Ong to the above reconciliation and to terminate th~s Contract, in two (2) conies, each of which shall be deemed an original. Michae McCabe !'Regional F+drninist:rator EPA Region TII Date T omas Hopkins ~-"-`' Director Virginia Department of Environrnenta: Ddte Quality ' The Commonweal~h h~ also paid $92.1 SO for the c~st of increasing the size of the water Pine to m~'et the local community's long rangy planning goals (See Appendix B of SSC). ROK. r0. UTILITY DEPT. TEL:1-540-3~7-6230 Or_t 09 98 9:03 hJo.004 P.01 ,,- A-101398-2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 13, 1998 AGENDA ITEM: Approval and authorization of the execution of the Consent Decree with the United States of America on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act in connection with the Palmerton Zinc Pile Superfund Site. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Please understand that this is not the Dixie Caverns Superfund site. This is an issue pertaining to another Superfund site. We became part of that site when Horsehead Industries shipped materials from Dixie Caverns to Palmerton and it was found to be in violation. All costs will be paid by Horsehead Industries. Recommend approval. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has notified the County of its qualification for a de minimis settlement pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act ("CERCLA" or "Superfund") in connection with the Palmerton Zinc Pile Superfund Site ("Site"), located in Palmerton, Carbon County, Pennsylvania. The allocated share for the County and Roanoke Electric Steel is $12,100.20 or 0.2428% of the total cost of $4,984,000. EPA has advised the County that it is eligible for this de minimis settlement, and that it is prepared at this time to finalize the Consent Decree. If the County wishes to participate in this settlement, it must sign and date this Consent Decree by early October. The County and Roanoke Electric Steel arranged for the transportation of materials from Dixie Caverns to other sites in Illinois and Tennessee owned and operated by Horsehead Industries, Inc. and Horsehead Resource Development Company, Inc. ("Horsehead"). Materials transported by us to Horsehead's other facilities were subsequently transported to this Site. The materials transported to the Site contained hazardous substances. The settling parties do not admit any facts or liability arising out of the transactions or occurrences alleged in the complaint or Consent Decree; the Consent Decree will not be construed to create any liability for the settling parties; and it will not be construed to limit the settling parties' ability to raise any defenses with respect to liability for and future arrangements. The United States and the settling parties agree that settlement without further litigation and without admission or 1 ~- a FISCAL Il~IPACTS: The County has received assurances from Horsehead that the County's and Roanoke Electric Steel's allocation will be paid by Horsehead. Horsehead has established an escrow fund to pay all of these allocations. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board approve and authorize the County Administrator to execute the Consent Decree with the United States of America on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act in connection with the Palmerton Zinc Pile Superfund Site. Respectfully submitted, ~~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by: Fenton F. Harrison to approve Johnson _ x Denied () execution of Consent Decree Harrison _ x Received () McNamara- x Referred () Minnix _ x To () Nickens _ x _ cc: File Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 2 E-o~ 110 East 59th Street D New York, NY 10022 (212) 527-3003 ~ SEP 3 0 1998 September 21, 1998 County of Roanoke & Roanoke Electric Steel Co. PO Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 Attention: President Dear Sir or Madam: ~rr~~~~~~r~ ~ ~~i~~~ ~~a~~~Y I am pleased to be writing to you regarding the finalization of the Palmerton Site de minimis settlement for the benefit of all Horsehead Resource Development Company, Inc. ("HRD") recycling customers. U.S. EPA has informed us that they have mailed to your company a final de minimis Consent Decree. This final Consent Decree gives you the contribution protection and covenant not to sue assurances of the U.S. government. HRD has worked closely with EPA on this de minimis settlement and believes our customers should take advantage of it. As you Ia1ow, HRD is paying the settlement amount as set forth in the Consent Decree on behalf of all of our customers, and the escrowed funds remain in place to accomplish this.. As we advised you in previous correspondence, HRD's indemnification does not cover the costs of any attorneys you may have elected to have participate in this settlement process. You will, of course, want to review the final Consent Decree carefully and I encourage you to contact us with any questions you may have. Most importantly, you should keep the following points in mind as you review the decree: Please do not send pa- .~.en: tc the gave-r.:rert w Lr~ y;u sign. the decrez, as ERD is paying the settlement amount. In addition, the settlement amount is not actually due until after entry of the Consent Decree with the court (see Section VI., paragraph 15). HRD will send you notice when entry occurs and confirmation that payment has been made. Paragraph 20 of the Consent Decree provides for your certification as to the volume of materials you sent to HRD's facilities. Please note that, as explained in Paragraph 23 of the Consent Decree, your "certification" is that the volume you sent to HRD is within 5,000 tons or 10% (whichever is greater) of the amount shown for your company in Appendix A of the Consent Decree. In other words, you are not attesting to an exact amount, but to a reasonably broad range. September 21, 1998 Page 2 ~,..~ HRD believes that U.S. EPA's rapid and effective actions in this settlement are a testament to its support of recycling and HRD's operations. HRD looks forward to continuing its ongoing commitment to superior environmental services for our clients and to the conservation of our natural resources. I would like to thank you for your cooperation throughout this important process. As always, please do not hesitate to call us at 212-527-3003 if you have any questions. Sincerely, 4~~~ ~`Jiilia~~, M. Quirk President & CEO WMQ:ch ACTION # ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 13, 1998 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance authorizing quitclaim and release of a water and sanitary sewer easement within the cul-de-sac of Otter Park Court and located between Lot 8, Block 2, Section 3 and Tract A-1, Block 2, Section 3 of The Groves, in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This is the first reading of the proposed ordinance to authorize quitclaim and release of water and sanitary sewer easement within the cul-de-sac of Otter Park Court and located between Lot 8, Block 2, Section 3 and Tract A-1, Block 2, Section 3 of The Groves. BACKGROUND: In July of 1993, Roanoke County obtained from Nicholas H. and Susan Cocke Beasley a 20-foot water and sewer easement for the development of the County's south loop water transmission line. Said easement is shown and designated as "New 20-foot Water and Sewer Easement" upon easement plat recorded in the Clerk's office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Plat Book 15, Page 150, and Deed Book 1412, Page 364. Soon thereafter, Palm Land Company, L.C. purchased the Beasley property for the development of a single family residential subdivision. Palm Land Company, L.C., subsequently subdivided the property by plat showing Section 3, The Groves, of record in the aforesaid Clerk's office, Plat Book 18, Page 153, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. The 20-foot water and sanitary sewer easement described above lies within Section 3 and is beneath Otter Park Court. 1 SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: ~', I In order for Otter Park Court to be accepted into the state secondary road system, the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) requires that the right-of--way be free and clear of any third party rights or encumbrances. The quitclaim and release of the subject portion of the water and sanitary sewer easement to the Commonwealth of Virginia would be subject to VDOT issuing a permit for such facilities and the condition that the facilities located within the 50-foot right-of-way, within the cul-de-sac of Otter Park Court and located between Lot 8, Block 2, Section 3 and Tract A-1, Block 2, Section 3 of The Groves, may continue to occupy the street in the existing condition and location. The release would be for so long as the subject section of Otter Park Court is used as part of the public street or highway system; however, said easement would not be vacated by the Board and would revert to the county in the event of abandonment of the street of highway. The Utility Department is in agreement with this request. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: (1) Adopt the proposed ordinance authorizing the County Administrator to execute the necessary documents for quitclaims and release of the water and sanitary sewer easement within the cul-de-sac of Otter Park Court and located between Lot 8, Block 2, Section 3 and Tract A-1, Block 2, Section 3 of The Groves. (2) Decline to adopt the proposed ordinance, which would result in Otter Park Court remaining a private road. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Roanoke County staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt the proposed ordinance as provided in Alternative 1. UB~MITTED BY: Arnold Covey, Director of Engineering & Inspections APPROVED BY: Elmer C. odge County Administrator 2 F~ ACTION Approved ()Motion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To pc: Vickie Huffman, Assistant County Attorney Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Department VOTE No Yes Abs McNamara _ _ Harrison Johnson _ Minnix _ _ Nickens 3 \ ~0 C. 'DIVE 'IS C'18 -}-, = - - SS.S.E. C• f ! ~ !S ~ j ~.: ,yw/Sp ~, // ~ C 9 4 5 S.F. .,• ~y ~ GF 7~ ~ SO 4 ~ -- C-19 C-1 - 57 - - 68 ®R~VE ~~ ~ ~ _. ~ \ S`2 SS,w SD' R/-y ' 12 ~ 3 „'7 3 ^ 30' ~~ ~ ~ `~11 812 S o as '~&( F T~ 11.11 ~ 506'24'SS•W C- C-~~ , . . ., _ _ BLOCK Q .ate ~h •~ ~~ p ~ C-Z4 ~ ~ v, G' - - - -" _ v 0 ~ ~ ~ 4 r--- ~ ~t2A2' ~ 11,D24 S.F. Ir~ r--~ ~ ~' "~ j'' ~ rn a' ` ' ~ iQ,117 S.F. '- ~ 22,269 ~ 10,765 S. F. ~~ 1 ( 3 9 O ~ ~ ~ 126.70 1 8 4 5~P ~ , ~ ~ 1 g D. 1 9 C • °J ly 88.6 '` ~ G ~ ~° ~, ~ i S 80 pl •Dx,' i 12,472 S. F. / f ~•'~ ~' ~ i a' ~ r 10.639 S.F. •d ~ ~~SF H ao !y '~'•ss~ ~h/~'' ~ 7 r / J~ ,, X32' ~ ~~ Q/„/ ° _ 0 7 3300', W,- ,~ / ~ ~f ` 12 1 ° % ~,~ , ~ v / '~ llsal'43E / / ' / ~ . 10 S.F. ~ ti i' G' i r 15,274 S.Fi 7 r` r ~15'D.E.~i / G ' \ // r / / t ~ x J~~ ~ ' 4 G 2?.95 11 ~ ~T~ }69• / / ~-- ~.'~,~ N / ~N °'B le?DS c ~ ~'~ t ~_ `~ ~. ~ - 8~ _ 14.2 ,, ~ 13, 512 S. F` `3;T v ~d~ ~ ta.»~crt. F'• ~~> ~' ~ 30- i / /~1 1 1 ~` ~ ~ 20' WATER AND SANITARY SEWER _ ~" ,~ ,- ~. EASEMENT TO BE QUITCLAIMED L y /~ NATURAL WA '~ _'~ EX. 20' S: S. E. ' t5' PuE D.B. 1495, PG. / ~~/ ~ ~ PROPOSED WATER AND SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT TO BE QUITCLAIMED SHOWN IN GRAY DESCRIPTION: A 20 foot water and sanitary sewer easement (P.B. 15, PG. 150 & D.B. 1412, PG. 364) within the cul-de-sac of Otter Park Court and located between Lot 8, Block 2, Section 3 and Tract A-l, Block 2, Section 3 of The Groves. ROANOKE COZINTY 20' WATER AND SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT D~'PARTMENT OF TO BE QUITCLAIMED CO1ktMUNITY DEVELOPMENT THE GROVES, SECTION 3 ~• ~ •1 `~ ~, ~ i V \ t ,` ~, F-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADNIlNISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 13, 1998 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING QUIT-CLAIM AND RELEASE OF WATER AND SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT WITHIN THE CUL-DE-SAC OF OTTER PARK COURT AND LOCATED BETWEEN LOT 8, BLOCK 2, SECTION 3, AND TRACT A-1, BLOCK 2, SECTION 3, OF THE GROVES IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, in order for Otter Park Court to be accepted into the state secondary road system, the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) requires that the right-of--way be free and clear of any third party rights or encumbrances; and, WHEREAS, VDOT has requested quit-claim and release of an existing water and sanitary sewer easement, twenty feet (20') in width, within the cul-de-sac of Otter Park Court and located between Lot 8, Block 2, Section 3, and Tract A-1, Block 2, Section 3, of the Groves, being a portion of the easement acquired by deed recorded in Deed Book 1412, page 364, and shown on plat recorded in Plat Book 15, page 150, to the Commonwealth of Virginia, subject to certain conditions; and, WHEREAS, it will serve the interests of the public to have Otter Park Court accepted into the state secondary road system and the release, subject to the issuance of a permit and other conditions, will not interfere with other public services and is acceptable to the Roanoke County Utility Department. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: G: WTTORNEY\VLMWP51 WGENDAUtOADS\OTCERPK.ORD ~I 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance. A first reading of this ordinance was held on October 13, 1998; and a second reading was held on October 27, 1998. 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the interests in real estate to be released are hereby made available for other public uses by conveyance to the Commonwealth of Virginia for acceptance of Otter Park Court into the state secondary road system by the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT). 3. That quit-claim and release of the water and sanitary sewer easement within the cul- de-sac of Otter Park Court and located between Lot 8, Block 2, Section 3 and Tract A-1, Block 2, Section 3 of the Groves, to the Commonwealth of Virginia, is hereby authorized subject to the following conditions: a. VDOT issuance of a permit for the water and sanitary sewer lines or facilities. b. The facilities located within the 50-foot right-of--way, between Lot 8, Block 2, Section 3, and Tract A-l, Block 2, Section 3, of the Groves, may continue to occupy the street or highway in the existing condition and location. c. The release would be for so long as the subject section of Otter Park Court is used as part of the public street or highway system. 4. That the subject easement is not vacated hereby and shall revert to the County in the event of abandonment of the street or highway. 5. That the County Administrator or an Assistant County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such further actions as may be necessary to accomplish this conveyance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 6. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. G:WTfORNE1'~VLI ~WP511AGENDA~ROADS~OTfERPK.ORD ITEM NUMBER ~-' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 13, 1998 AGENDA ITEM: Request to vacate a 6-foot portion of a 60-foot unimproved right-of-way referred to as Thomas Drive, as recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 179, located in the Catawba Magisterial District. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: -~ G~~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Staff is recommending that the 6-foot portion of the unimproved right-of-way be vacated on the condition that an additional 6 foot portion of new right-of-way be dedicated so that the new right-of--way for Thomas Drive remains 60 feet in width. In addition, the existing 6-foot portion of right-of--way being vacated, will be retained as public utility easement. Once the portion of Thomas Drive right-of-way is vacated, this property will be combined with the adjacent property per the requirements of Title 15.2, Chapter 22, Code of Virginia, 1950 (as amended) as cited in Section 15.2-2272(2). BACKGROUND: The petitioner, Thomas, Ltd. is the owner of Lot 18-A and developer of Campbell Hills, Section 3 subdivision as recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 179 and located in the Catawba Magisterial District. The petitioner desires to vacate the 6-foot portion of the Thomas Drive right-of--way (unimproved), due to the encroachment of the house on Lot 18-A, constructed within the 30-foot front yard setback building line. Once the 6-foot portion of right- of-way has been vacated, the property will be added to Lot 18-A, thus providing the existing house with the required 30 feet of front yard setback from the new right-of- way. This vacation is being done as per the requirements of Title 15.2, Chapter 22, Code of Virginia, 1950 (as amended) as cited in Section 15.2-2272(2). 1 F- a The petitioner has agreed to dedicate additional right-of-way and revise the construction plans in order to maintain Roanoke County and VDOT standards for the future extension of Thomas Drive (Route 1190), as shown on the attached map. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: County staff supports the proposed vacation of the 6-foot portion of right-of--way and dedication of additional right-of-way so that Thomas Drive will remain 60 feet in width and not affect the future extension of Thomas Drive (Route 1190). This vacation should be completed in accordance with Chapter 22, Code of Virginia, 1950 (as amended) as cited in Section 15.2-2272(2). First reading will be held October 13, 1998. A second reading of the proposed Ordinance and public hearing is scheduled for October 27, 1998. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: County staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the first reading of the ordinance to vacate the 6-foot portion of the referenced right-of-way and maintain the vacated area as a public utility easement. ITTED BY: Arnold Covey, Director Department of Community Dev lopment Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To ACTION Motion by:_ pc: Paul Mahoney, County Attorney APPROVED BY: r C. Hodge County Administrator VOTE Harrison Johnson McNamara Minnix Nickens No Yes Abs 2 F-a ~~ NORTH 0.0651 ACRE 17 e z 3 80UNDED BY CORNERS • Op. 30 . 11 THRU 17 TO ~ S4 JOB F 11 INCLUSIVE : •11 'p • Jq / BEING DEDICATED TO COUNTY OF ROANOKE p : C •~~ 10 O FS ~ ~ ~ BY THOMAS, LTD. I ` l • ~ ~Oq J 9F • • I N24 ss 55 FT. RADIUS ~ F ::~.~`~ : ~ , ~ ' ~ ` 1 4 35862~F 7 TEMPORARY ~ ; rV ti TURNAROUND ~' : `A' ^~~ ;'~ / l ~ ~ ~ ~ 0.040 ACRE `ti :', ~ \ rV ~ :~ti ~ BOUNDED BY CORNERS ~ ~`~' ~~ ;~ ~ 3, 8, 9, 10, 6, 5, 4 ~ ~, .~ia h : •~ J ~~ : ~ ti ;, ~• TO 3 INCLUSIVE BEING VACATED BY ~ w /rye co ~ :~h~ J' COUNTY OF ROANOKE w o co ' p ~~ ry ~. t J/~ w co ~ :~ ' ~ ~ ; L ~ ~ OT 18-A ~ ~ 6 ~ 0 • ~ ~ ; 1.160 ACRE 0 PROPERTY OF ~\ .: 6p THOMAS, LTD 3 :' ~O• :~~,• HOUSE ENCROACHES 5.2' INTO MBL 2<" O O : Q 4X # 63.03-01-04 12 O i^ / ~ }..~ ~ ~ ~.8. 1569, PG. 697 / ~ : ~ i. v O torch • r' - -- 0:.13 ~~ Oa:~~ ~: - Q ~, eortc ~_ oprvrt / 3p ~ - ~ / g .08~ ~ ~ e~. 'G O ~° .F :. ~ ~ ~ ~~ O 171.36' SO1'10'34"E o :. SUTHERLAND CIRCLE i `° : a Q" o ~ ~ ~ ~0 50' WIDE ~~v .ra ~~ VA. SEC. RTE. 1192 u ;' ~~ ~ o~ .~ 14 :~ O ~. r/ ; J J O ROANOKE COUNTY VACATION OF 6-FOOT PORTION OF A 60-FOOT UNIMPROVED DEPARTMENT OF RIGHT-OF-WAY REFERRED TO AS THOMAS DRIVE, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 9, PAGE 179, LOCATED IN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 13, 1998 ORDINANCE VACATING A 6-FOOT PORTION OF A 60-FOOT UNIMPROVED RIGHT- OF-WAY KNOWN AS THOMAS DRIVE, CREATED ON MAP OF SECTION NO. 3, CAMPBELL HILLS, PLAT BOOK 9, PAGE 179, AND FURTHER SHOWN ON RESUBDIVISION PLAT FOR THOMAS, LTD., PLAT BOOK 19, PAGE 176, IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, by subdivision plat entitled "MAP OF SECTION N0.3, CAMPBELL HILLS" dated May 28, 1980, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Plat Book 9, page 179, the owner dedicated a 60-foot right-of--way known as Thomas Drive; and, WHEREAS, Thomas Drive is further shown on plat entitled "RESUBDIVISION FOR THOMAS, LTD.", recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 19, page 176; and, WHEREAS, the subject portion of Thomas Drive, along the southern property line of Lot 18-A (P.B. 19, pg. 176), formerly Lot 18 (P.B. 9, pg. 179), Section 3, Campbell Hills, is currently an unimproved right-of- way; and, WHEREAS, the Petitioner, Thomas, Ltd., is the developer of Campbell Hills subdivision and is the current owner of Lot 18-A and the remainder tract of land on the opposite side of Thomas Drive, designated on the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map No. 63.03-01-04; and, WHEREAS, as a result of a 5.2' encroachment of the house constructed on Lot 18-A into the 30-foot building setback line, the Petitioner has requested that a portion of Thomas Drive, 6 feet in width and extending along the southern property line of Lot 18-A, be vacated pursuant to § 15.2-2272.2 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended); and, WHEREAS, in exchange, the Petitioner has agreed to dedicate additional right-of--way on the opposite side of Thomas Drive to maintain the right-of--way at the same width; and, WHEREAS, this vacation, subject to the conditions herein, will not involve any cost to the County and the affected County departments have raised no objection; and, Fa WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by §15.2-2204 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), and the first reading of this ordinance was held on October 13, 1998; the public hearing and second reading of this ordinance was held on October 27, 1998. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That a portion of Thomas Drive, 6' in width and extending along the southern boundary of Lot 18-A, being designated and shown as "0.040 ACRE BOUNDED BY CORNERS 3, 8, 9, 10, 6, 5, 4 TO 3 INCLUSIVE BEING VACATED BY COUNTY OF ROANOKE" on Exhibit A attached hereto, said right-of--way having been dedicated on the subdivision plat entitled "Map of Section No. 3, Campbell Hills" dated May 28, 1980, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 9, page 179, and being further shown on plat entitled "Resubdivision For Thomas, Ltd.", recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 19, page 176, in the Catawba Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to Section 15.2-2272 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), subject to the following conditions: a. That the section of Thomas Drive which is located within the area designated as 'S5 ft. radius temporary turnaround' shall be excepted from this vacation and shall continue to constitute a portion of the temporary turnaround until such time as Thomas Drive may be extended and the temporary turnaround may be vacated. b. That additional right-of--way, 6 feet in width, on the opposite side of Thomas Drive, being designated and shown as "0.065f ACRE BOUNDED BY CORNERS 11 THRU 17 TO 11 INCLUSIVE BEING DEDICATED TO COUNTY OF ROANOKE BY THOMAS, LTD." on Exhibit A attached hereto, be dedicated by subdivision plat as part of Thomas Drive. c. That the vacated portion of Thomas Drive is hereby reserved and retained as a public utility easement for a total easement width of 21' when added to the existing 15' public utility easement along Thomas Drive on Lot 18-A. d. That fee simple title to the vacated portion of Thomas Drive shall vest in the owner of the abutting property (Lot 18-A) as provided in §15.2-2274 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), subject to the above-described public utility easement and subject to the condition that the vacated area of land shall be added and combined, by deed or by plat, to said abutting property, in compliance with the Roanoke County Subdivision and Zoning Ordinances, and other applicable laws and regulations. G:\ATTORNEY\VLHWGENDA\THOMAS.ORD 2 r--a e. That all costs and expenses associated herewith, including but not limited to publication, survey and recordation costs, shall be the responsibility of the Petitioner; and, 2. That the County Administrator, an Assistant County Administrator, or any County Subdivision Agent is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as maybe necessary to accomplish the provisions of this ordinance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 3. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption, and a certified copy of this ordinance shall be recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in accordance with § 15.2-2272.2 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended). G: WTTORNE Y\VLHWGENDA\THOMAS.ORD ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~ 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 13, 1998 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE ENACTING SECTIONS 10-9.1, 10-9.2, 10-9.3 and 10-9.4 IN ARTICLE I OF CHAPTER 10 LICENSES OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO INCORPORATE AND CONFORM WITH RECENT LEGISLATION ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY REGARDING LIlVIITATION ON GROSS RECEIPTS FOR PARI- MUTUEL WAGERING, REAL ESTATE BROKERS, PROVIDERS OF FUNERAL SERVICES, AND STAFFING FIRMS FOR BUSINESS, PROFESSIONAL, AND OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE TAX PURPOSES COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This is the first reading of the proposed ordinance to enact Sections 10-9.1, 10-9.2, 10-9.3 and 10-9.4 in Article I of Chapter 10 LICENSES of the Roanoke County Code to incorporate recent legislation set forth in Sections 58.1-3732.3 and 58.1-3732.4, as well as the similar provisions in Sections 58.1-3732.1 and 58.1-3732.2, of the Code of Virginia. These statutes contain special provisions for limitations on gross receipts in determining business, professional and occupational license (BPOL) taxes due from the following specific businesses: parrmutuel wagering, real estate brokers, providers of funeral services, and staffing firms. The second reading and public hearing are scheduled for October 27, 1998. BACKGROUND: Chapter 37 (Section 58.1-3700, et seq.) of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, authorizes localities to adopt an ordinance imposing a BPOL tax. The County of Roanoke has adopted such an ordinance which is set forth in Chapter 10 LICENSES of the Roanoke County Code. '~`~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The state code definition of "gross receipts" for BPOL tax purposes, which is incorporated into the County Code, is "the whole entire, total receipts, without deduction." However, the 1998 General Assembly enacted §58.1-3732.3 to limit the gross receipts of providers of funeral services so as not to include amounts collected by any such provider "on behalf oi; and paid to, another person providing goods or services in connection with a funeral, whether contracted for by the provider or by the customer. The General Assembly also enacted §58.1-3732.4 to limit the gross receipts of staffing firms to not include employee benefits paid by a staffing firm to, or for the benefit of, any contract employee for the period of time that said employee is actually employed for the use of the client company pursuant to the terms of a PEO services contract or temporary help services contract. 'Employee benefits' are defined as "wages, salaries, payroll taxes, payroll deductions, workers' compensation costs, benefits, and similar expenses." Although these state code provisions supersede any local authority and are mandatory, rather than discretionary, in the administration of the BPOL tax without adoption by the locality, County staff is recommending that these specific limitations be incorporated into the County Code. The similar provisions of §58.1-3732.1 related to limitation on gross receipts for pari-mutuel wagering and of §58.1-3732.2 related to limitation on gross receipts for real estate brokers have been in effect for a number of years, but have been included in the proposed ordinance for purposes of consistency. The proposed ordinance incorporates the specific provisions of the corresponding state code legislation and is to be effective as of January 1, 1999, to coincide with the County's license tax year of January 1 to December 31. FISCAL IlVIPACTS: The Commissioner of Revenue's Office estimates the possibility of a $40,000 annual reduction in revenue as a result of these mandatory State Code changes which will be applicable regardless of the Board's action on this ordinance. ALTERNATIVES: (1) Approve the first reading of the proposed ordinance and schedule the matter for a second reading and public hearing on October 27, 1998. (2) Decline to adopt the proposed ordinance, in which case the County BPOL tax will be administered pursuant to the state code provisions. 2 ~- 3 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: above. Staff recommends adoption of the proposed ordinance in accordance with Alternative #1 Respectfully submitted, Vic 'e .Huffman Assistant County Attorney Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: ACTION G:\ATTORNEY\VLH\BPOL\1998RE V.RPT 3 VOTE Harrison Johnson McNamara Minnix Nickens No Yes Abs F3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VII2GINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 13, 1998 ORDINANCE ENACTING SECTIONS 10-9.1, 10-9.2, 10-9.3 and 10-9.4 IN ARTICLE I OF CHAPTER 10 LICENSES OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO INCORPORATE AND CONFORM WITH RECENT LEGISLATION ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY REGARDING LIMITATION ON GRO S S RECEIl'TS FOR PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING, REAL ESTATE BROKERS, PROVIDERS OF FUNERAL SERVICES, AND STAFFING FIRMS FOR BUSINESS, PROFESSIONAL, AND OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE TAX PURPOSES WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority of Chapter 37 (Section 58.1-3700, et seq.) of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, the County of Roanoke, Virginia, imposes a business, professional, and occupational license (BPOL) tax through the adoption of an ordinance codified in Chapter 10 of the Roanoke County Code; and, WHEREAS, the 1998 General Assembly enacted §58.1-3732.3 to limit the gross receipts of providers of funeral services and §58.1-3732.4 to limit the gross receipts of staffing firms for BPOL tax purposes; and, WHEREAS, §58.1-3732.1 related to limitation on gross receipts for parrmutuel wagering and §58.1-3732.2 related to limitation on gross receipts for real estate brokers are similar, previously existing provision of the state code; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors deems it appropriate, for informational, conformity and consistency purposes, to incorporate the cited state code provisions into Chapter 10 of the Roanoke County Code; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors finds that the adoption of these uniform provisions, by incorporation into the existing ordinance, will serve the public interest and will benefit the citizens and taxpayers of Roanoke County; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been published in a newspaper of general circulation within Roanoke County on October 13, 1998, and October 20, 1998; and, WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on October 13, 1998, and the second reading and public hearing was held on October 27, 1998. F3 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Sections 10-9.1, 10-9.2, 10-9.3 and 10-9.4 in Chapter 10, LICENSES of the Roanoke County Code be enacted as follows: Chapter 10. LICENSES* ARTICLE L IN GENERAL **** Sec. 10-9.1. Limitation on "gross receipts" - Pari-mutuel wagering. Gross receipts for license tax purposes under this chapter and under Chapter 37 (§58.1-3700 et seq.) of the Code of Virginia shall not include the license and admission taxes established under §§59.1-392 and 59.1-393 of the Code of Virginia, respectively, nor shall it include pari-mutuel wagering pools as established under §59.1-392 of the Code of Virginia. Sec. 10-9.2 Limitation on "gross receipts" -Real estate brokers. Gross receipts of real estate brokers for license tax purposes under this chapter and under Chapter 37 (§58.1-3700 et seq.) of the Code of Virginia shall not include amounts received by any broker which arise from real estate sales transactions to the extent that such amounts are paid to a real estate agent as a commission on any real estate sales transaction and the agent is subject to the business license tax on such receipts. The broker claiming the exclusion shall identify on its license application each agent to whom the excluded receipts have been paid, and the jurisdiction in the Commonwealth of Virginia to which the agent is subject to business license taxes. Sec. 10-9.3 Limitation on "gross receipts" -Providers of funeral services. Gross receipts of providers of funeral services for license tax purposes under this chapter and under Chapter 37 (§58.1-3700 et seq.) of the Code of Virginia shall not include amounts collected by any provider of funeral services on behalf of, and paid to, another person providing goods or services in connection with a funeral. The exclusion provided by this section shall apply if the goods or services were contracted for by the provider of funeral services or his customer. A provider of funeral services claiming the exclusion shall identify on its license application each person to whom the excluded receipts have been paid and the amount of the excluded receipts paid by the provider of funeral services to such person. As used in this section, "provider of funeral services" means any person engaged in the funeral service profession, operating a funeral service establishment, or acting as a funeral director or embalmer. Sec. 10-9.4 Limitation on "gross receipts" -Staffing Firms. (a) Gross receipts for license tax purposes under this chapter and under Chapter 37 (§58.1-3700 et seq.) shall not include employee benefits paid by a staffing firm to, or for the 2 ~~ benefit of, any contract employee for the period of time that the contract employee is actually employed for the use of the client company pursuant to the terms of a PEO services contract or temporary help services contract. The taxable gross receipts of a staffing firm shall include any administrative fees received by such firm from a client company, whether on afee-for-service basis or as a percentage of total receipts from the client company. (b) For the purpose of this section: "Client company" means a person, as defined in §1-13.19, that enters into a contract with a staffing form by which the staffing firm, for a fee, provides PEO services or temporary help services. "Contract employee "means an employee performing services under a PEO services contract or temporary help services contract. "Employee benefits" means wages, salaries, payroll taxes, payroll deductions, workers' compensation costs, benefits, and similar expenses. "PEO services" or "professional employer organization services" means an arrangement whereby a staffing firm assumes employer responsibility for payroll, benefits, and other human resources functions with respect to employees of a client company with no restrictions or limitations on the duration of employment. "PEO services contract" means a contract pursuant to which a staffing firm provides PEO services for a client company. "Staffing firm " means a person, as defined in § 1-13.19, that provides PEO services or temporary help services. "Temporary help services" means an arrangement whereby a staffing firm temporarily assigns employees to support or supplement a client company's workforce. "Temporary help services contract" means a contract pursuant to which a staffing firm provides temporary help services for a client company. 2. That the provisions contained in this ordinance shall be in effect on and from January 1, 1999. 3 ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER ~ f"5 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 13, 1998 SUBJECT: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1. BUILDING CODE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS The four year term of Larry W. Degen, Alternate, expired July 28, 1998. The four year term of Richard L. Williams, Consulting Engineer will expire October 24, 1998. They are eligible for reappointment. 2. GRIEVANCE PANEL The two year term of Raymond C. Denney, alternate, will expire October 10, 1998 The new terms will be for three years. 3. LEAGUE OF OLDER AMERICANS -ADVISORY COUNCIL The one year term of Dee Pincock expired March 31, 1998. Mr. Pincock is eligible for reappointment but has indicated he does not wish to serve another term. He has continued to serve until someone is appointed but has now officially resigned. Please see attached letter. 4. NEW CENTURY VENTURE CENTER BOARD OF DIRECTORS Owen Poole has served on the New Century Venture Center Board of Directors as Roanoke County's representative. He has moved to Tennessee and the position is now vacant. The Center has requested that the Board of Supervisors appoint an individual to serve as the County's representative. Please see the attached letter. Hl-5 The Board may appoint a member of the County staff or a citizen to this position. 5. TASK FORCE FOR SENIOR AND PHYSICALLY CHALLENGED CITIZENS Assistant County Administrator John Chambliss has received resignations from Betty Dangerfield and Nancy Hall who represent the Cave Spring Magisterial District on this Task Force, and these representatives need to be replaced. There is no set term for these appointments. SUBMITTED BY: Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board ACTION Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) cc: File Motion by: APPROVED BY: ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator VOTE No. Yes Abs Harrison _ _ _ Johnson McNamara- _ _ Minnix Nickens 2 l . ~'~/r~ ~_ ~m ~r ~~ ~ c~ ~ Cc~ t~n~t ~ ~-C1~lyl~n,st1~~~~cY' ~ ~-~~ Ln ~~ C'~ lsG ~~~ ~ ~~ ~ -~ ~ y ~~7 ~~ ~ p ~ 5~'d~f' `~ ~~ tGct~ _~ i yy~~,, j~~~ir /riN~ ~o I~ ~ ~~r cc ~- ~' E ~' ¢ Ste. ervisc>r ~~~ k ~~/~ ~y~ ~ ~ I ~ i7 ~ ~hF r~~ ~ ~ 5 ~ .~ce~ti 7 ~ ~. c~ ree~~ ~f~ }^ ~ ~p re~su~.~~` ~~ c~-~ c l~S ~ CCU ~~'~ ~ O Y1 ~- h ~ ~1 ~ ~'' S ~~ r ~~ a ~, ~, ~ ,~ ~ 1 of ~ ~~ ~ w ~s C c~,-t`F~.c ~-~ ~/ % ~ ~~e p ~l c~~~ 6 ~~ s c»~ ~ cry ~ t (d ~~ C~.u~,~~~1~ i ~~ {-~ s~r~e ~-,~~her ~ ~~r, .i rEsp~nG~~d ~ h a~ ~ ~-~~~1~ ~a~ {~~~~~~ -~v S~lv~ ' (-~oureueY 5,nc~ L ~'tca~c~ ~~ moh~. r~`c/c~ra`i ~1~ Q ~ne`eas~ c3 Y' 1 fi ~' ~',`~1 u.~~ ~-~~ a~~~c1~ } h e /~v~`so:~ _ C~u.M ~ ~ ~ mee - r e~ 1~cc-v,~ ~ ~ C~ ~n J 1 ti ~~5, ~~ persvYt~~ G- 5~ ht~~F c ~1~n~~~, y~ ~~ crn q e r Ce,-~`~ ~~ u c ~-~ S e N v~, ,~ cl ~. ~ e~~-~-e r rz s m ~ ~~o r w~ a ~ r ~ s ; ~ r~ ~:~i ~ I e ~ s ~ (~- c ~ ~ ya` ~-l~ - s ~ c1 -}-c~ se v ~~ L U /4~ ~ haves s ~, c~~r~se~ tn'Is, ~us~, ~(, tl;~~S, P Jess ~ ~ x~ re 5 S vny ~}-h~~-,.kS -k~ ~!-~~ l~~•~r~ o~ S~~~rd~s~rS -~ ~ Y (~, ~ ~ C fL' ~` n yr, ~ h ~, s C^ p po r~ wn . ~ ~~ ~c~ Sc ~ ~~ -e „ ~• U 1'' i 5 ~° `~ "'/ ~i Yi ~ X C~e (I ~n.~ ~ ~o b ~f ~' t ~'j't pdr~c~-t~ ~Urn~ncey-,`~~i/ Se y1a~; ~' ~ } h ~ ~, C ~aYi'~"/ S ~ o ~t } ~ ~~' 1^e'o Ye. S ~-L~'ecl C~ v~ ~y1 e ~--o i,' ,` s c~ r `l ~~ ~,~c ~ l ~ -f ~ c~ l9 - rK~ YleXt ~1'l~E,~~ n ll~l: (l ~je nel~ ~G 1/ 1~~ ~~(~ ~~~ S' ~CY~- y ~` o~~r_~ ~; September 18, 1998 Ms Mary Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors PO Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Dear Ms Allen: This is an official request to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to appoint a representative to serve as Roanoke County's position on the Board of Directors for The New Century Venture Center. I would appreciate the Board of Supervisors officially appointing someone to fill this vacancy as soon as possible. Our next Board meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, September 22, at 7:30 AM here at the Center. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Please give me a call if you have any questions. Sincerely, ~ ~., Lisa C. I on President 1354 Eighth Street, SW • Roanoke, UA 24015 • Phone: (540) 344-6402 • Fax: (540) 345-0262 • e-maiL• lisonC+~rev. net ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 13, 1998 RESOLUTION 101398-3 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM I -CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. that the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for October 13, 1998 designated as Item I -Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 6, inclusive, as follows: Approval of Minutes for August 18, 1998. 2. Confirmation of committee appointment to the Grievance Panel. 3. Resolution requesting the acceptance of new portions of Old Cave Spring Road, Crystal Creek Drive, Pleasant Hill Drive to the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System; and abandonment of those portions of the above roads and Route 221 (Brambleton Avenue, Bent Mountain Road) which no longer serve public need. 4. Resolution requesting the acceptance of new portions of Valley Forge Avenue, Concord Place, Bunker Hill Drive, Valley Forge Circle to the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System, and abandonment of those portions of the above roads which no longer serve public need. 5. Resolution requesting the acceptance of new portions of West River Road and Dry Hollow Road to the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System, and abandonment of those portions of the above roads which no longer serve public need. 1 ~' 6. Resolution requesting the acceptance of Starlight Lane to the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System and abandonment of those portions of the above road which no longer serves public need. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the Consent Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections 2 T- ~ August 18, 1998 537 Roanoke County Administration Center 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 August 18, 1998 The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the third Tuesday, and the only regularly scheduled meeting of the month of August, 1998. N RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Johnson called the meeting to order at 3:02 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Bob L. Johnson, Vice Chairman Harry C. Nickens, Supervisors Fenton F. "Spike" Harrison, Joseph McNamara, H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney; Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator; Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator; Anne Marie Green, Director, Community Relations IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES The invocation was given by Father Joseph Lehman, Our Lady of Nazareth Catholic Church. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited by all present. August 18, 1998 539 present. Supervisor Minnix moved to adopt the resolution. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson RESOLUTION 081898-1 CONGRATULATING THE TOP WINNERS OF THE CIRCLE SUGGESTION PROGRAM FROM MAY 1997 TO MAY 1998 WHEREAS, in the fall of 1996, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors requested that the County of Roanoke develop a suggestion program that would encourage employees to reduce costs and improve operations; and WHEREAS, on April 8, 1997, the Board of Supervisors approved the establishment of the CIRCLE Suggestion Program, which stands for "CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT OF ROANOKE COUNTY LED BY EMPLOYEES"; and WHEREAS, since the program began, 76 County employees have submitted suggestions and 46 of the implemented suggestions have generated an estimated savings of up to $131,671 over athree-year period; and WHEREAS, in addition to monetary winnings, the winners received a CIRCLE T-Shirt from the County Administrator and were recognized in the CIRCLE Newsletter and Roanoke County Today; and WHEREAS, John Patten, General Services; Bill Fowler, Jr., Engineering; Charles Paitsel, General Services; Nancy Thomas, Treasurer's Office; Dean Wood and Rick Harless, Utility Department; Henry Wiley, General Services; Ragena Jordan, Human Resources; Roger Reed, General Services; William A. Richardson, Planning and Zoning; Robert A. Reitz, General Services; Dorothy P. Dickason, Treasurer's Office; Elaine B. Gill, Human Resources; William L. Thorne, Parks & Recreation; Edna Lawson, Rebecca D. Fralin and Victoria A. Webb, Management Information Systems; Keith G. Roberts and Mark Erickson, County Garage; Eric S. Wilson, General Services-Shop; were the top winners during the first twelve months of the program. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, wishes to express its congratulations to these employees for their ingenuity, their innovative ideas and for meeting the challenge of improving County operations and services; and FURTHER, on behalf of the citizens of Roanoke County, the Board of Supervisors encourages them to continue their outstanding efforts in the future. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None August 18, 1998 541 following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None RESOLUTION 081898-2 APPROVING AN OPTION TO PURCHASE AGREEMENT WITH MICHAEL W. ROSE AND TRACT Y. ROSE FOR CERTAIN PROPERTY, (BEING IDENTIFIED AS COUNTY TAX MAP PARCEL 77.13-5-30) AS PART OF A PROPOSED ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, by Option to Purchase Agreement dated July 30, 1998, Michael W. Rose and Traci Y. Rose, husband and wife, granted unto the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, an option to purchase 0.251 acre, more or less, being further shown on the Roanoke County land records as Tax Map Number 77.13-5-30, ("the Rose Property"); and, WHEREAS, under the terms of said agreement, the option fee is $2,000.00, the purchase price for the "Rose Property" is to be $150,000 and the option must be exercised on or before January 30, 1999, and closing is to occur within thirty (30) days from the date of rezoning of this property by the Board of Supervisors, whichever comes first; and WHEREAS, at such time as said option is to be exercised, this matter will be brought back to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, for adoption of an ordinance to authorize exercise of the option and acquisition of the real estate. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: (1) That the Option to Purchase Agreement dated July 30, 1998, between Michael W. Rose and Traci Y. Rose, husband and wife, Grantor, and the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, Grantee, and the terms and conditions provided for in said agreement, is hereby approved and the execution of said agreement by the County Administrator is hereby authorized and ratified. (2) That the County Administrator or assistant county administrators are hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County in this matter as may be required to determine the feasibility and necessity of exercising the option and acquiring said Property, all of which shall be approved as to form by the County Attorney. (3) That this resolution shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ~, August 18, 1998 RESOLUTION 081898-3 AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF ROANOKE TO ESTABLISH A JOINT FIREARMS TRAINING RANGE AT THE DIXIE CAVERNS LANDFILL SITE WHEREAS, a firearms training range is an essential facility for law enforcement personnel in order that each officer may be recertified in firearms at least once a year as required by the Commonwealth of Virginia and to provide additional training and practice to reduce the potential for civil liability; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Police Department and the Roanoke County Sheriffs Office have been forced for a number of years to borrow time at a firing range operated by Norfolk Southern which has significantly impaired the flexibility of these departments in scheduling training and firearms recertifications; and WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke and the City of Roanoke have negotiated over a period of several years in an attempt to locate a mutually acceptable site for a firing range which would adequately serve the firearms training needs of law enforcement officers in both jurisdictions; and WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke and the City of Roanoke have reached agreement for the construction of a firearms training range upon County-owned property known as the Dixie Caverns landfill site which location has been previously granted a special use permit for such purpose by Ordinance 12495-15 passed on January 24, 1995. The County and City have agreed to share equally in the cost of construction of the firing range with the County's capital contribution to include the current appraised value of the real estate involved which shall remain the property of Roanoke County. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia that the MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT dated the 3rd day of August, 1998, between Roanoke County and the City of Roanoke for the construction and operation of a firearms training range on approximately 14.9 acres of land owned by the County in west Roanoke County is approved; and further That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute this MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT and such further documents as shall be necessary to carry this agreement into effect, all upon such form as shall be approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 3. Request to allocate funds to Roanoke County Recreation Clubs as part of beverage concession agreement with Pepsi. (Pete Haislip. Parks and Recreation Directorl _, August 18, 1998 545 NAYS: None 4. Adoption of resolution designating Blue Ridge Communitx Services as an operating board and adoption of a.perFormance agreement. (John Chambliss. Assistant County Administrator R-081898-5 Mr. Chambliss advised that the 1998 General Assembly passed legislation which amends and re-enacts the Section of the Code of Virginia relating to local responsibilities for mental health, mental retardation and substance abuse services. Effective July 1, 1998, each locality must designate their Community Service Board (CSB) as one of three option types. These are: (1) Operating Community Services Board, which is the method currently used for the appointment of members to the Blue Ridge Community Services; (2) Administrative Policy Community Services Board; and (3) Policy-Advisory Community Services Board with a local government department. Localities are also being asked to formally approve the performance contract for the Blue Ridge Community Services to the State. The local contribution to the BRCS is included in the County's budget and no new appropriation of money is required. Tom Chapman, from BRCS, was present and responded to questions. Mr. Chambliss asked that the Board adopt the resolution designating BRCS as an Operating Community Services Board and approve the performance contract for submittal to the State. Supervisor Minnix moved to adopt the resolution. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: August 18, 1998 ~d7 AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 1. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to construct a 100 ft. cellular monopole tower and support building, located on Catawba Valley Drive, 0.75 mile west of Oakey-Dolin Rd.~ Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of U. S. Cellular. IN RE: FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. First reading of ordinance to establish water service area for Clearbrook-U.S. Route 220 Corridor and authorize acquisition of easement. (Gary Robertson, Utility Director In response to Supervisor Johnson's inquiry, Mr. Robertson advised that there has been one change since he informed the Board of this project at an earlier meeting. He advised that a surcharge has been added for people who do not participate initially which is 25% of the construction costs and which is consistent with other projects. In response to Supervisor Minnix, Mr. Robertson advised that construction should begin in December and take no longer than 90 days. Supervisor Minnix moved to approve the first reading and set the second reading for September 8, 1998. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 2. First reading of ordinance to vacate quit-claim and release August 18, 1998 54~ session; and (3) within the Option Agreement, the County will close on acquiring this property within thirty days of a successful rezoning. If the rezoning is delayed, he suggested that the Board could delay the second reading of the ordinance. However, it would help to move the project forward if they approved the first reading of the ordinance. There was no discussion. Supervisor. Minnix moved to approve the first reading and set the second reading for September 8, 1998. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None IN RE: APPOINTMENTS 1 Social Services Advisory Board Supervisor Nickens nominated Supervisor Minnix to serve another four year term which will expire August 1, 2002. IN RE: CONSENT AGENDA R-081898-6. R-081898- 6.d Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the Consent Resolution. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None RESOLUTION 081898-6 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN 1 i `k\ August 18, 1998 551 amendment to the performance agreement dated July 22, 1997; and, WHEREAS, the proposed amendment would extend the payback period for Country East, L.L.C., for an additional year to 2005, and reduce the annual penalty to $10,000.00 per year for not meeting the terms of the agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That execution of the Amendment to Performance Agreement with the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia, and Country East, L.L.C., to provide for acquisition of the required sight distance easement from Country East, L.L.C., in consideration for which the payback period for Country East, L.L.C., is to be extended for an additional year to 2005, and the annual penalty for not meeting the terms of the agreement is to be reduced to $10,000.00 per year. 2. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute said performance agreement on behalf of the Board of Supervisors, and take such further actions as maybe necessary to accomplish this transaction, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 3. That this resolution shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None IN RE: REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS 1. Request to schedule work session on September 8 1998 to review the Community Plan. It was the consensus of the Board to schedule the work session for September 8, 1998. 2. Request to schedule work session on September 8, 1998 to discuss the Committee's recommendations concerning location of communications towers. It was the consensus of the Board to schedule the work session for i i J ~\ ,i August 18, 1998 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Future School Capital Reserve 5. Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investments and Portfolio Policy, as of July 31. 1998 6. Report from the Virginia Department of Transportation of changes to the Secondary System as of July 1998 IN RE: EXECUTIVE SESSION At 4:15 p.m., Supervisor moved to go into Executive Session following the work sessions pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A. (5) discussion concerning prospective businesses or industries where no previous announcement has been made. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None IN RE: WORK SESSIONS 1. Work Session on School Construction Projects The work session was held from 4:15 p.m. until 5:05 p.m. After discussion, it was the direction of the Board that Mr. Hodge draft a letter to the School Board i August 18, 1998 555 in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Certification Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None IN RE: NEW BUSINESS 1. Resolution supporting 1-73 through the Roanoke Valley, Chairman Johnson advised that the Board had a work session on the three alternative routes of I-73 through the Roanoke Valley. I-73 is the proposed interstate which may or may not be built from Charleston, South Carolina to Detroit. Supervisor McNamara asked that consideration of this resolution be postponed until the September 8, 1998, meeting and without objection of the Board, it was postponed. IN RE: PUBLIC HEARINGS AND SECOND READINGS OF ORDINANCES 1. Second readinu of ordinance creating Virginia's First Regional Industrial Facility Authority. (Paul Mahoney, Count/ Attorney 0-081898-8 / August 18, 1998 7 and the comfort, convenience and welfare of its citizens require the development of facilities and that joint action through a regional industrial facility authority will facilitate the development of the needed facilities; and, WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke is authorized by the Act to participate in such Regional Authority and the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, in conjunction with other governing bodies hereby proposes to create Virginia's First Regional Industrial Facility Authority, a public body politic and corporate created pursuant to the Act; and, WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on July 28, 1998; and the second reading and public hearing was held on August 18, 1998, and was duly advertised. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County as follows: 1. That there hereby is created an Authority pursuant to the Virginia Regional Industrial Facilities Act, Chapter 64 of Title 15.2 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, whose name shall be "Virginia's First Regional Industrial Facility Authority" and whose member localities shall be as follows: The County of Bland, Virginia The County of Craig, Virginia The County of Giles, Virginia The County of Montgomery, Virginia The County of Pulaski, Virginia The County of Roanoke, Virginia The County of Wythe, Virginia The City of Radford, Virginia The City of Roanoke, Virginia The City of Salem, Virginia The Town of Christiansburg, VA The Town of Dublin, Virginia The Town of Narrows, Virginia The Town of Pearisburg, Virginia The Town of Pulaski, Virginia each of which is a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia, authorized to participate as a member of the Authority by the Act and collectively are the "Member Localities." 2. That as provided by the Act, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, after due consideration, hereby makes the following findings: A. The economy of Western Virginia has not kept pace with those of much of the rest of the Commonwealth. Individual localities in the region often lack the financial resources to assist in the development of economic development projects. Providing a mechanism for localities in the region to cooperate in the development of facilities will assist the region in overcoming this barrier to economic growth. The creation of a regional industrial facility authority will assist this area of the Commonwealth in achieving a greater degree of economic stability. B. The purpose of the regional industrial facility authority is to enhance the economic base for the member localities by developing, owning, and operating, one or more facilities on a cooperative basis involving its member localities. C. The exercise of the powers granted by the Act shall be in all respects for the benefit of the inhabitants of the region and other areas of the August 18, 1998 ~~~ requesting to speak on this issue. Supervisor Harrison moved to adopt the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ORDINANCE 081898-9 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO ROBERT LEWIS AND ELAINE LEWIS TO ALLOW AN ACCESSORY APARTMENT IN A R-1, LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, AT 1714 MILLBRIDGE ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 56.01-4-16), CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Robert Lewis and Elaine Lewis have filed a petition to allow an accessory apartment in a R-1, Low Density Residential District, located at 1714 Millbridge Road (Tax Map No. 56.01-4-16) in the Catawba Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on August 4, 1998; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on July 28, 1998; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on August 18, 1998. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Robert Lewis and Elaine Lewis to allow an accessory apartment in a R-1, Low Density Residential District, located at 1714 Millbridge Road (Tax Map No. 56.01-4-16) in the Catawba Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.2-2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved with the following conditions: (1) Height of the accessory apartment shall be limited to one story. (2) Exterior materials will match those of the existing house. (3) Apartment will be occupied by family members only. 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty {30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Harrison to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the ~ August 18, 1998 561 is a separate County sponsored project in this area that will also tie in with this project. Supervisor Harrison moved to adopt the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ORDINANCE 081898-10 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 3.830-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ROUTE 419 ACROSS FROM ITS INTERSECTION WITH LOCKE STREET (PART OF TAX MAP NO. 36.19-1-40) IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF NORTH ROANOKE DEVELOPMENT CORP. WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on July 28, 1998, and the second reading and public hearing were held August 18, 1998; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on August 4, 1998; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 3.830 acres, as described herein, and located on the east side of Route 419 across from its intersection with Locke Street (Part of Tax Map Number 36.19-1-40) in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of C-1, Office District, to the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of North Roanoke Development Corp. 3. That the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts: (1) The final site plan shall generally conform with the Master Site Development Plan for ARK Medical Center, prepared by Jerome Donald Henschel, dated June 5, 1998. (2) No access to either the development or to Route 419 shall be made from either Embassy Drive or Governor Drive. August 18, 1998 ~~~ On motion of Supervisor Harrison to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson ', NAYS: None 4. Second reading of ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to operate a used automobile dealership, located at 5423 Williamson Road, Hollins Magisterial District. upon the petition of The Hertz Corp. (Terry Harrington. County Planner Mr. Harrington advised that this is a petition of the Hertz Corporation to use an existing building and parking area on Williamson Road as a sales facility. The Planning Commission thought that it was an appropriate use and they recommended approval with two conditions: (1) pertaining to commercial entrance permit from the Virginia Department of Transportation; and (2) that there is a Code requirement that a defined entrance and landscape strip be created along the front of the property. He advised that a representative of Hertz Corporation was present to answer questions. In response to Supervisor Johnson, Mr. Harrison advised that the letter from P. C. Land, Inc. regarding a contract to purchase the property, had been received after the Planning Commission meeting. Mr. Bryant Sullivan, 80 Little Mountain Circle, Rocky Mount, Virginia, representing the Hertz Corporation, advised the Board that no one from P. C. Land had been in touch with them about their concerns. In response to Supervisor Nickens, Mr. Sullivan advised that : (1 }the owner of the property was Dr. Fralin; (2) that Hertz currently August 18, 1998 565 NAYS: None 5 Second reading of ordinance to rezone 5.4 acres from I-2 to I-1 and obtain a Special Use Permit to construct amini-warehouse, located in the 5800 block of Starkey Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Virginia Varsity Transfer, Inc. (Terry Harrington, County Planned 0-081898-11 Mr. Harrington advised that this is a petition to down zone a parcel of land to permit mini-warehouse to be constructed within the rear of the Greenbrier Nurseries, Inc. The Planning Commission felt that this was an appropriate location and recommended approval with one proffered condition pertaining to the color of the doors on the building. There was no discussion and no citizens requesting to speak on this issue. Supervisor Minnix moved to adopt the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ORDINANCE 081898-11 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 5.4-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED IN THE 5800 BLOCK OF STARKEY ROAD (PART OF TAX MAP NO. 87.18-2-24) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF I-2 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF I-1 WITH CONDITIONS i i August 18, 1998 56r, (Virginia Secondary Route 904); thence leaving Crescent Heights Subd. and with Starkey Road, s. 75 deg. 30' 29" W. 53.70 feet to a point being the southeasterly corner of proposed New Tract IIA (7.696 acre parcel); thence leaving Starkey Road and with 4 proposed new division lines surrounding New Tract IIA, N. 35 deg. 52' 28" W. 599.41 feet to a point; thence S. 77 deg. 39' 54" W. 403.27 feet to a point; thence with a curve to the left, which said curve is defined by a delta angle of 37 deg. 23' 02", an arc length of 195.74 feet, a radius of 300.00 feet, a chord of 192.29 feet and bearing S. 03 deg. 35' 32" E. to a point; thence S. 15 deg. 05' S9" W. 409.32 feet to a point, said point located on the northerly right-of-way of Starkey Road (Vrginia Secondary Route 904); thence with said Starkey Road and leaving the southwesterly corner of proposed New Tract IIA with a curve to the left, which said curve is defined by a delta angle of 4 deg. 32' 56", an arc length of 58.85 feet, a radius of 741.20 feet, a chord of 58.83 feet and bearing S. 73 deg. 17' 56" W. to Corner #1, the place of Beginning, and containing 5.385 acres. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 6. DENIAL OF Second reading of ordinance to rezone approximately 20 acres from R-1, R-2 and C-2 conditional to C-2 General commercial, for the purpose of general retail and service uses, located in the vicinity of Brambleton Avenue (Route 22,1 and Electric Road (Route 419), Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Roanoke County Board of Supervisors (Terry Harrington, County Plannerl '_~ August 18, 1998 569 project over the last month. They held a public hearing on August 4, 1998, and at that time the public was made aware that Home Depot was the user of the site. After hearing from 12 citizens, they delayed action until after a work session on August 17 from 3:00 p.m. until approximately 7:00 p.m. A detailed transmittal report was prepared for the Board with the comments of the community and Planning Commission after this work session. After the public comment section, the Commission met to consider the impact of the proposal on adjacent property owners, including Hidden Valley Lane; stormwater management, noise issues, lighting, signage, architectural design, retaining wall and needs for traffic study. Jeff Echols from VDOT and Steve Barger from the County Engineering Department attended the meeting and answered questions about the traffic flow. The Commission agreed that if the land is rezoned by the Board, it would be their recommendation that the Hidden Lane properties designated as "optional" on the maps should be rezoned to C-1, Office district, instead of C-2, General Commercial District. The Planning Commission's final motion was to recommend approval of the petition. The Commission suggested that the effective date of the rezoning ordinance would be 30 days after Home Depot acquires the property designated as C-1. They also suggested 11 conditions which Mr. Harrington described: (1) Westmoreland Drive shall be realigned and redesigned to provide for certain traffic control measures that will prevent commercial traffic from entering the residential neighborhood adjoining the real estate identified in Table 2. (2) The intersection of the realigned Westmoreland Drive and Brambleton Avenue shall be located to create afour-way intersection between Westmoreland Drive and the private drive August 18, 1998 571 5540 Westbriar Court; (5) Barbara Burnett, 4816 Brockwood Drive; (6) Paul Bell, Cresthill Civic League, 2705 Hillbrook Drive; (7) Steve Noble, 5276 Canter Drive; (8) Nettie Hale, 4020 Hidden Lane; (9) Laurie Beane Perry, 227 Braxton Avenue; (10) Suzanne Seth, 3342 Westmoreland Drive; (11) Patricia L. Meador, 3812 Antietam Drive; (12) Carl Herbst, 7331 Carriage Hills Drive; (13) Hal Jones, 3734 Thompson Lane; (14) Vern Jolley, 3110 Harmony Road;(15) Michael Naughton, 3827 View Avenue; and (16) Warren Basham, yielded his time to Doug Basham. The following citizens spoke in support of the rezoning: (1) Allan Ham, 6001 Monet Drive; (2) Roger Wickert, 2727 Electric Road;(3) Mike Cleary, 3038 Purple Finch Road; and (4) James Garris, 3108 D Honeywood Lane. Mr. Mike Pace, Attorney with Gentry, Locke, Rakes & Moore; spoke on behalf of Charlie Felts and two other owners who have contracted to sell their properties. Mr. Ed Natt, 4803 Topping Hill Drive, spoke on behalf of Springwood Associates, the company which has secured voluntary contracts of sale for the project to go forward. Mr. Bob Turner, 4825 Merriman Road, yielded his time to Mr. Natt. Ms. Marie Lovell, 3429 South Park Circle, spoke of her concern about the stormwater from a large building such as Home Depot on her community; that they experience flooding now; and asked the County to continue to be aware of their problems. There was discussion among the Board members concerning the re- alignment of Westmoreland Drive to prevent traffic from entering the residential neighborhood but leaving access for emergency vehicles. It was suggested that Mr. August 18, 1998 5r,~ ', WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on July 28, 1998, and the second reading and public hearing were held August 18, 1998; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on August 4, 1998; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: On motion of Supervisor Minnix to deny the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Nickens NAYS: None PRESENT: Supervisor Harrison ABSTAIN: Supervisor Johnson IN RE: CITIZENS COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS 1. Julie Stowers, 3326 Kenwick Trail, expressed disappointment with the decision to have two high schools in Southwest County. Her other concerns included the possible disadvantages of two high schools, and the increase of $1.6 in annual operating costs. She felt that building one high school and moving the Cave Spring Junior High School students to the current high school would save $1.9 million. She asked that the Board of Supervisors decide the most appropriate way to spend the available funds for schools. Ms. Terry Langford, 6011 Ponderosa Circle and Ms. Beth Slovensky, 3758 Verona Trail, yielded their time to Ms. Stowers. 2. James Garris. 3108-D Honeywood Lane asked why the Merriman Road property which was purchased for a school site was not being utilized, and if this site is not suitable, why has this decision not been disclosed. He felt that the School Board and the Board of Supervisors should have asked these questions before purchasing the site and A-101398-3. a ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER '' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 13, 1998 SUBJECT: Confirmation of appointment to the Grievance Panel COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The following nomination has been made and should now be confirmed. 1. GRIEVANCE PANEL Supervisor Nickens nominated R. Vincent Reynolds to a three year term which will expire September 10, 2001. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the above appointment be confirmed by the Board of Supervisors. SUBMITTED BY: ~• Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board ACTION APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Approved (x) Motion by: H. Odell Minnix to approve Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( 1 VOTE No Yes Abs Johnson _ x Harrison _ x McNamara- x Minnix _ x Nickens x cc: File Grievance Panel File ..~ -3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 13, 1998 RESOLUTION 101398-3.b TO REQUEST THAT THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ADD INTO THE SECONDARY SYSTEM OF STATE HIGHWAYS NEW PORTIONS OF EXISTING ROUTE 1663 (OLD CAVE SPRING ROAD), ROUTE 897 (CRYSTAL CREEK DRIVE) AND ROUTE 1548 (PLEASANT HILL DRIVE)AND ABANDON THOSE PORTIONS OF ROUTE 1663 (OLD CAVE SPRING ROAD), ROUTE 1548 (PLEASANT HILL DRIVE) AND ROUTE 897 (CRYSTAL CREEK DRIVE) AND ROUTE 221 (BRAMBLETON AVENUE, BENT MOUNTAIN ROAD) WHICH NO LONGER SERVE THE PUBLIC NEED. WHEREAS, Route 221, from 0.139 miles south of Route 419 to 1.860 miles south of Route 419, a distance of 1.721 miles, has been altered and a new road has been constructed under Project 0221-080-107, C-501, and WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has provided the Board with a project sketch dated August 25, 1994, depicting the additions and abandonments required in the primary and secondary system of state highways as a result of this project, which sketch is attached hereto and hereby incorporated herein by reference, and WHEREAS, the new road serves the same citizens as those portions of old road identified by the project sketch to be abandoned and those segments no longer serve a public need, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add Sections #6, 13, 24, and 26, shown shaded on the project sketch, to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229 of the Code of Virginia; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board hereby abandons Sections #5, 12, 23 and 25, shown cross-hatched on the project sketch, as part of the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-155, Code of Virginia; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board hereby concurs in the abandonment of Sections #1, 2, 3 and 4, shown stippled on the project sketch, as part of the primary system of state highways, by resolution of the Commonwealth Transportation Board, pursuant to §33.1-148, Code of Virginia, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote Moved By: Seconded By: Yeas: Nays: Absent: Supervisor Minnix None Required Supervisors McNamara. Minnix. Harrison. Nickens. Johnson None None A Copy Teste: ~• Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Virginia Department of Transportation 2 r- NN. RSF. 687 ~ NS E f~ I ~7 STA, Ib*25 051-tf, tLNN. TYTE.613 ~ STA It•l5 `~ ~'" 'T' ,~ \~ ~•C? Ml • ~ ' 613 ~ '~ ~ •613 ~~ ~ ~ ~ A EXiST. RTE. 1548 I STA. II.00 ~ S A. II~t80 T, 10 \\ ~•O'~R!• - _ ~~~ •STRf~•M _ _ ~ _ EXIST. RTE 1663 - ~- - - - - - 2Z1 ~~ T. 5 ~ ~ O.O4AQb 'r .. TA. IDA•DO '~ ° TA. 19 * 0 CT c ~ MAIN UNE MAiN LINE Q.10 All. I ai ECT. b T 1663 - ~ D. !d 1+4l. 0.05 /+(l. S T. I > ~~ ( ~: ,o~,~,. ~ TA. Ob+ TA. 10750 663 MAIN LIFE EXIST RTE. T . I5 + 1 RTE. 1548 1548 l S'~ ~.. _1547 ~- - __J - ~1 ~1~15ERT 3 T ~ A. I~ o S Rid. 897 i ~T 24 i . , 0 O'~ndi~ RTE. 89~ ~`I qt i ' ~~ .~~~ .~, I SFLT_25 (o.o'~•u~ 1 3 ~ CT. 2~0 (p.o~nU 7 , Q•~~(. , i ' •~~ ) BACK (,XEEk ~' MA IN U1JE ' it SECLZ7 / ~ ` Z21 '. ~ `~ o.oZ ~!. ~ ~ = _q i `~ , '-~ STA.173+Ia \ ) MAW LINE TA.I ,+10 y ~ l . MAIN LINE I \ 5r CT 4 5EC7. 3 0• to.t,t~ ~, ~ ~ 0.09 nt1• SEE BASE MAF ~ Imo, \ ~ L~ / -I Virginia Department or Transportation _ ~,,,,, Please give breakdown of mileage and pavement types for all sections of the ^ 5 T&S l i F orm - comp ete project, subm t Tragic Engineering Division August 25, 1994 for entire project. ,~ 1~~ w 4 J ~°~ ~~ ?~ \\ _ v - :S'. Q ~~. l l U\ I~ ~ .,,t ~~ •, •., ~ s , ~~ s '~ r~ L _ a ~ - Y ~ m x o ~ ~ ~ 9 vl F .9 J ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~`-~~ V ~ a r ~ o~ ~~ m ~, i i, ,, ~; 1 ~~_ _, I~g 9 ~ I t'~ ~i .i_ J ~ ~ ~. < F- ~" ? ra ec'-~ .n `O --~ , ~ J ~!'1 v .+ .1. ~ / `•' ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ u - $ m '. ~ ~ ~~ji UE /~ ~ d W ~ - H~ ~~ N ~ ~~ ~~ z •15 3~n~n~ L-____1 b,N '?i~~ EO.6~+OScI 1'd as 'n3n '3~ °i4'9L+~41 ~,• ~ ', `~ ~ G+`:1 • ~~ ~ N 1~ ~ ~~ J -I ° --9-r `I ~= r' - Q ~- ~ dl ~ ._.~., ,c r- a ~ iy~,i ~ ~t 'Q,Hd 'n ' ~ x 4 ' oc , ` fZ ~ , ~] 000 l.L LL j i`' I , p N o ~, a I ,, 1 1'^ L_ ~ J ... a W fQ.. I `\ ~ '~ \ Cfl ~ N `~ N t ` ~ \\ ' t i 11 ~'~! ~ ~ ~ ' ~ 11~ ~ `1l ~. c W •(OQ~ ~ _ _ ~ ~~ pl ~ N x ~~ ' + a r g . a ~ 2 ~ E ~ ~ ~ ~ >, N ..d o ~ M 'C7 G 7 •~ 'L7 ~ O ~ e _ • L ` ~ ca p U ar i ~ ~+ C C U vC A ~ ~ V1 . L~ ~ 7 y y G ~ ~ r O O O C C a b v O ~ U 9 ~ 0 • °o ' o ' •~ • ' ~ ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ $ $'Y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o .c J C O a O ~ O ~ ~ o p ~ O ~ e U R.' P.' G>r ~ ~ •a .b ~ O • ~ o ~' ~' ~ c ~ ~ ~ }~ c ~ h l 0 G ~ (~ U y [n f/1 3 G 0 -o O o 0 ~~ 0 0 o p O o ~, N o O o 'a Ws E o • 0 • 0~ : • o • 0 • 0 • ~ ~ o • a a a : a i a ~ a c a . ~ to cn ci v i v ] to U v) ~ .a ~ Pr ~ C r ~ e o ~~ q U W ~1+Sli '1'a'd C L ~ m +-' fn ~ O ~,~., ~ O L1. O y {= >_ 3 ~ -~ 'D p to Y w ~ N ~ tU O O ~ ~'o •o > ~. a a .~~m~ ~. rnEac 4.~av° r U 7 m - ~~ ~` o • ^ N 0 ' a C ~ ~'~ O - ~~ CLI - lJJ N c . T-3 ~• ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~- 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 13, 1998 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution to request that the Virginia Department of Transportation add into the secondary system of state highways new portions of existing Route 1663 (Old Cave Spring Road), Route 897 (Crystal Creek Drive) and Route 1548 (Pleasant Hill Drive), and abandon those portions of Route 1663 (Old Cave Spring Road), Route 1548 (Pleasant Hill Drive) and Route 897 (Crystal Creek Drive) and Route 221 (Brambleton Avenue, Bent Mountain Road) which no longer serve the public need. 'S COMMENTS: ~ O`~r~~,, The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) is requesting that new portions of Route 1663 (Old Cave Spring Road), Route 897 (Crystal Creek Drive), and Route 1548 (Pleasant Hill Drive) be added to the secondary system of state highways, and that certain existing portions of Route 1663 (Old Cave Spring Road), Route 897 (Crystal Creek Drive), Route 1548 (Pleasant Hill Drive) and Route 221 (Brambleton Avenue, Bent Mountain Road) be abandoned in order for the Commonwealth Transportation Board to obtain clear title to the underlying property and to update the mileage records. Due to the 1994 realignment of Route 221, Brambleton Avenue, road alterations created sections of Route 1663 (Old Cave Spring Road), Route 897 (Crystal Creek Drive) and Route 1548 (Pleasant Hill Drive) which require acceptance into the state secondary road system. There are also sections of these routes and Route 221 (Brambleton Avenue, Bent Mountain Road) which are portions of the old roadway and no longer serve a public need. Pursuant to approval of the Commonwealth Transportation Commissioner, VDOT has requested that the Board of Supervisors adopt a resolution in accordance with §33.1-155 to abandon the old sections of roadway and to add the new sections into the state secondary system of highways. -3 SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: VDOT is requesting the additions and abandonments, per the attached sketch and as specified in the attached proposed Resolution, of portions of Route 1663 (Old Cave Spring Road), Route 897 (Crystal Creek Drive), Route 1548 (Pleasant Hill Drive) and 221 (Brambleton Avenue, Bent Mountain Road) as a consequence of the realignment of Route 221 (Brambleton Avenue, Bent Mountain Road) which took place in 1994. Each of the new roads, as realigned, will serve the same citizens as the old roads. Once the portions of old road are abandoned, the property will be considered for conveyance by VDOT in accordance with Section 33.1-154 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended). STAFF RECOMMENDATION: County staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt the attached Resolution to add the new portions of Routes 1663, 897, and 1548 as part of the secondary system of state highways, and to abandon those portions of Routes 1663, 897, 1548, and 221 no longer serving a public need. S B TTED BY: , A d Covey, Director -~ Department of Community Develo ment Approved Denied Received Referred To: ACTION Motion by: 1 APPROVED BY: .i~+~/ mer C. Hodge County Administrator Harrison Johnson McNamara Minnix Nickens VOTE No Yes Abs pc: Paul Mahoney, County Attorney ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON OCTOBER 13, 1998 RESOLUTION to request that the Virginia Department of Transportation add into the secondary system of state highways new portions of existing Route 1663 (Old Cave Spring Road), Route 897 (Crystal Creek Drive) and Route 1548 (Pleasant Hill Drive)and abandon those portions of Route 1663 (Old Cave Spring Road), Route 1548 (Pleasant Hill Drive) and Route 897 (Crystal Creek Drive) and Route 221 (Brambleton Avenue, Bent Mountain Road) which no longer serve the public need. WHEREAS, Route 221, from 0.139 miles south of Route 419 to 1.860 miles south of Route 419, a distance of 1.721 miles, has been altered and a new road has been constructed under Project 0221-080- 107, C-501, and WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has provided the Board with a project sketch dated August 25, 1994, depicting the additions and abandonments required in the primary and secondary system of state highways as a result of this project, which sketch is attached hereto and hereby incorporated herein by reference, and WHEREAS, the new road serves the same citizens as those portions of old road identified by the project sketch to be abandoned and those segments no longer serve a public need, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add Sections #6, 13, 24, and 26, shown shaded on the project sketch, to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229 of the Code of Virginia; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board hereby abandons Sections #5, 12, 23 and 25, shown cross-hatched on the project sketch, as part of the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1- 155, Code of Virginia; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board hereby concurs in the abandonment of Sections #1, 2, 3 and 4, shown stippled on the project sketch, as part of the primary system of state highways, by resolution of the Commonwealth Transportation Board, pursuant to §33.1-148, Code of Virginia, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. _ ~ I r 1 r '" - ~' ,.iuii~ -_ ~. ~K L '- iNSER ~ i ~ I I~$7 STA. Ib•LS ~ ~ T , ~{ I ~"-~ ~~~ `~ p5l-if, D CONN. RT6. b13 Ii+lS STA \~ • 0.p7Mi. 613 ~ T •bl ` ' ~ ~ ~ EXIST. RTE. 1548 I STA. I 1 •C10 S A. II0t80 ' ~ C ~R~ - REp M .~ sT _ EXIST. RTE Ibb3 ~ •o • = "" - - - ___ - 2Z1 T. 5 ~ TA. 19 t 0 0.O4+Kti TA. IOq•oo S CT 9 MAW LING MAIN LINE Q•!O AII. ' ~ '' ECT. b ~ I O.Id IKI. 16h3 - 0.05 ' ~ SECL 13 F ( o.09 n/l. I TA. Ob * TA. 17+ 50 T 15 + ~ ` EXIST. RTE. 1663 MAIN FINE RTE. 1549 I ISaB I l.~ ~ _ _154 ~ __ - INSERT 3 STA. Ib~ :~I R1E. 897 8~7~ i CF.~T. 24 ~ , .~' CTn 1 ~.. 7n 1C. 0.o7+tl• ~~ •.f'~ ;~~t SECT. 25 (a •05! r!!~ ~EICT 2~ ~p.o3~-U'7 / gAC.K (,KEEk r ' 1 l•~5G i MAIN LINE SECT. 27 O.oZ~f. ~ ~ * . „r ~~_' STA. 173+14 -_~.; f \ ~ ) MAW LINE TA.I ~;~10 l MAIN UNE I~Nn\ •,. ~,CT 4 SECT. 3 0. to •u~ ~, ~ ~ ~; 0.49 nu• SEE BASE MAF ~ Imo, \ \ !.~ / -I Virginia Department of Transportation ,,,,,, Traffic Engineering Division Augusl25, 1994 Please give breakdown of mileage and pavement types for all sections of the complete project, submit Form T&S-5 for entire project. ~.,,---, N, lL •.~ w .~ ti,ri •a~ ~,a ~n3r •~ G J ~1 ;g -- ~\\ q ~• l f ~1 r ~ •,~` ;~.F4+~LM .i,p.d r s ,~~ ~ ~nl (. n L '`V Q v1 ~ ~ W n x > Y 4 _ LL _ ~ ~ , ~ m ~ '~ F ~ ~ . M v O S 0~ ~ r- r ' J ~ ~~ ~O o °` ~~ wu~ 1 GS m /~ i ~, ,~ ,, ~,___ _ i a ~ ~ u~ ' ~~ ~_~ ~~ ~r~ ~i ~_ c ~^ J ~ Ml ~. 6~ f ~ r a ~` ~'a N `O ~~~~ e C O u C O f% ~ N O u 1,' •p V] w 'b •b 7 $ '~ 'fl y C y ~ O C •~ ~ 'O ~ O ~ v ~aqy p U ~ ~y ~ T , C w O O O C C '~ p 0 ~U ~ ° ° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a .~ J ~ ~O • y C ~p t00 G~" ~" o p u C W u: ~ ~° ~ o ~~ ~ c ~ 3 ~ 0 b o ~ ~ N a s O O O~ L o o O ~ O i ~ n T ~ ~ n U ti v i v i r • Q 8 a • _ ~~ ~g S r~ , ~ • }t± ~ .; ~F~. ~••~ U Q 9 ~i i ~- D// /~ ~ ~ ~ i CC/ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~`` ~ ~~ ed t i~ ~~ \` ' \R~ Z "15 ~21~.ind ~ \ w L---- 7'bL+O~CI '1'd ~ ~ I ~ S~' 1 ~ ~o ---~--'~-~ .= r_ ~~ a r- ~K i ~1 •4.H '~38'i~p IE o~c Z ~ •~ x~B '~32I 'jjp LI I_ ~~ i ~ ~~ ~ ,a N ~ I ~~i ~m ~ - --- ~ --.~J m ~ N ~~ ~ N `~ ~~ ~\\ i 11 ' ~ ' ' ~~L' ~"I r ~ ~ '~ l~. .~ N ~ ~~ 4 ~~ ~\ O •ofi+5l1 'L'0 ~ N ~ ~ « ~ ~ O ~°~,. ~ O_ ~~lL O vi C . ~ 3 ~ ~ '~ p N Y "-, tD N ~'j .3 ~ ~ ~ ~ i.0~•p•0 a a 'o~ ~ a? a~ I~ E ac N ~ ~ ~ anc~° o ~ o > a ~ ~~g~ o - ~ " ~~ N ~ Y 7 d-H~ O ~~ _~ Z=3 ACTION # ..r-a' ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 13, 1998 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution to request that the Virginia Department of Transportation add into the secondary system of state highways new portions of Route 1520 (Valley Forge Avenue) and Route 1602 (Concord Place, Bunker Hill Drive, Valley Forge Circle) and abandon those portions of Route 1520 (Valley Forge Avenue) and Route 1602 (Concord Place, Bunker Hill Drive, Valley Forge Circle) which no longer serve the public need. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~---~-~ The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) is requesting that new portions of Route 1520 (Valley Forge Avenue) and Route 1602 (Concord Place, Bunker Hill Drive, and Valley Forge Circle) be added to the secondary system of state highways, while certain existing portions of Routes 1520 (Valley Forge Avenue) and 1602 (Concord Place, Bunker Hill Drive, Valley Forge Circle) be abandoned in order for the Commonwealth Transportation Board to update the mileage records. Due to the 1994 relocation and construction of Route 1602, the road alterations created sections of Routes 1520 and 1602 which require acceptance into the state secondary road system. There are also section of these routes which are potions of the old roadway and no longer serve a public need. Pursuant to approval of the Commonwealth Transportation Commissioner, VDOT has requested that the Board of Supervisors adopt a resolution in accordance with §33.1-155 to abandon the old sections of roadway and to add the new sections into the state secondary system of highways. ma=y SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: VDOT is requesting the additions and abandonments, per the attached sketch and as specified in the attached proposed Resolution, of portions of Route 1520 (Valley Forge Avenue) and Route 1602 (Concord Place, Bunker Hill Drive, Valley Forge Circle) as a consequence of the relocation and construction of Route 1602 which took place in 1994. Each of the new roads, as realigned, will serve the same citizens as the old roads. Once the portions of old road are abandoned, the property will be considered by the County of Roanoke for vacation pursuant to §15.2-2272 and vesting of title pursuant to §15.2-2274 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended). STAFF RECOMMENDATION: County staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt the attached Resolution to add the new portions of Routes 1520 and 1602 as part of the secondary system of state highways and to abandon those portions of Routes 1520 and 1602 no longer serving a public need. SUB~NTTED BY: Department of Community Development APPROVED BY: er C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved ( )Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied () Harrison Received () Johnson Referred () McNamara To: Minnix Nickens pc: Paul Mahoney, County Attorney ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON OCTOBER 13, 1998 RESOLUTION to request that the Virginia Department of Transportation add into the secondary system of state highways new portions of Route 1520 (Valley Forge Avenue) and Route 1602 (Concord Place, Bunker Hill Drive, Valley Forge Circle) and abandon those portions of Route 1520 (Valley Forge Avenue) and Route 1602 (Concord Place, Bunker Hill Drive, Valley Forge Circle) which no longer serve the public need. WHEREAS, Route 1602, from the intersection of Route 221 to 0.035 miles west of Route 682, a distance of 0.133 miles, has been altered by the Virginia Department of Transportation and a new road has been constructed under Project 1602-080-248, and WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has provided the Board with a project sketch dated October 31, 1994, revised dated March 21, 1995, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference depicting the additions and abandonments required in the secondary system of state highways as a result of this project; and WHEREAS, the new road serves the same citizens as those portions of old road identified in the project sketch to be abandoned, and those segments no longer serve a public need, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add Sections #4, 5, 7, 8 and 10, shown shaded on the project sketch, to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229 of the Code of Virginia, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby abandons Sections #1, 2, 3, 6, and 9, shown cross-hatched on the project sketch, as part of the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-155 of the Code of Virginia, and BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. /---``` `` V' mow' ti 2 ~ / ~ ~_ O ~ N ~ ,ii / ~ -` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N C_~9 ' \ / ~ i ^ i / LI C "'IQ +~~ •~S ~ ~~ ~~ ~ 'Q~Hd 3 '~!(1S qi '~bL+WI 'S'ad v a v - ~ ~ CO ~ ~ `v ~8 ~o°' a ~ .a 0 N ~ O ~ v,' V] ,_.V d' ~ m ~~ H ~~ ~~ ~~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~~ F- ~ ~~ ~ / / ~~+II 'V1S ~ c~ ~ / / '_' ~ ~ ~~ ~ "i ; ~ \ ~ r i ~ ~ - ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~6a~ i ~~~2~ dJ o ~~ Q '8 .g •v '9 d ~ ~ 7L » R1 ~ y '~ V7 (/1 Sp ~ ~ O ~°+ ' M d C O ~ Q ~ lAVvO O D ~ ~ ~ Cn O V ~ h cba ~ O ~ •~ at~~ Y ~ V R" ~ d ~o 6i d d~ p ~ d ~ ~ oo C d d a i to y h q A ~ o 0 ~'~ 0 0 0 •~° o w o ~ ° •n° •a° o ~ •a° ~ ~ ~ °`' Y N ~ ~cn U b .. .9 "' ~~~ e ° ,a L7 0 // ~~~ \\ ~ 71 4~j ~p 1'; ~ ~ d~ ~ o ~ ~~~ Z ~ c~ao~ .°~ ~ ~ ~ N N ~j ° ~ ~' 'o ~ a~ 3 .° 'o a oNa~ ~~a~y a~ ~ a~ .n` -~ a ,a ~~~~ .~ ; ~ a~S ~ ~s ~ co '-' a ~ o ti ~a ~ z `~ 7~i N ZIP N ~4 ~ yT 'O '~ ~ H ~ ~ s+ o ~ w is ~ v N H o ~ m-W~~ U ~ a-~a~ o`~~flc a 5 ' T~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 13, 1998 RESOLUTION 101398-3.c TO REQUEST THAT THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ADD INTO THE SECONDARY SYSTEM OF STATE HIGHWAYS NEW PORTIONS OF ROUTE 1520 (VALLEY FORGE AVENUE) AND ROUTE 1602 (CONCORD PLACE, BUNKER HILL DRIVE, VALLEY FORGE CIRCLE) AND ABANDON THOSE PORTIONS OF ROUTE 1520 (VALLEY FORGE AVENUE) AND ROUTE 1602 (CONCORD PLACE, BUNKER HILL DRIVE, VALLEY FORGE CIRCLE) WHICH NO LONGER SERVE THE PUBLIC NEED. WHEREAS, Route 1602, from the intersection of Route 221 to 0.035 miles west of Route 682, a distance of 0.133 miles, has been altered by the Virginia Department of Transportation and a new road has been constructed under Project 1602-080-248, and WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has provided the Board with a project sketch dated October 31, 1994, revised dated March 21, 1995, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference depicting the additions and abandonments required in the secondary system of state highways as a result of this project; and WHEREAS, the new road serves the same citizens as those portions of old road identified in the project sketch to be abandoned, and those segments no longer serve a public need, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add Sections #4, 5, 7, 8 and 10, shown shaded on the project sketch, to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229 of the Code of Virginia, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby abandons Sections #1, 2, 3, 6, and 9, shown cross-hatched on the project sketch, as part of the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-155 of the Code of Virginia, and BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote Moved By: Supervisor Minnix Seconded By: None Required Yeas: Supervisors McNamara. Minnix, Harrison. Nickens, Johnson Nays: None Absent: None A Copy Teste: ~~~ Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Virginia Department of Transportation i /C~ O \~ ~. / ~ / i ~i ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~O Q O N ~' n~ V ~_ O NQ / h. ~~~111 / ~ i "_ ~ ~ Y:L~ \ ~ ~Hd ~ '~!(1S ql •~bL~gl '1'~i ~,9 ~ '11321 i10 ~Cl'Q~1+~I- li I` ~\ ~~ a a cn ~ ~ c- N ~~ ~~ D O ~ , N v O ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ u ~ o - ~ ~`: .~~ ,~,~ ~ y c~fY _~ ~ ~ ~Lbod, H- `~ \ / 05' b~ ~ II 'd1S ~~ ~ v / ~ N ~~ ~ ~ / ~ i - ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ bJ d, ~~~2/ a^ O~ f•~ V U W 1 1 `n ~ ~ ~ a •V .~ •o L i ~ h 'Q C/I ' n u lC ~ ~ S7 ~' '9 9 ~ ~ ~ , ~ G p O O N U F~ C ~ ~ ~ U ~ N '~ U ~ v~°, c'Oa ~ O ° O J C 9 N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d C CQ c U~ O N l 0 UC~ fc IQ O o o C ~ O ~ T N v~ ~ ~ v~ N v~ N ~'' a ~' +~+ ~ b c a ': 0 0 0 ~' •b° o ~ • ~ C Yi ~ ~ ~ `~i ~ c i~ ~ "' u r v~ ri vi v~ U v~ ~ e ^° - s ~a ~o ~/ .-gipp ~ \ \ / l ~06 , d1 4~ ~~ \ l- v ~ , ~ - c ~ 1v O y~ a ~ ~~~ 2 ~ c~ o ~ U ~ ~~~~~ ° ~ ~ 'o ~ ~ L 3 ~p 'o a o ~ a~ -Yaa~~ a`Di~m ~ m ~ ~ ~ •~~ U~ o~S vii G. L ~ ca «' a coo oti ._ ~ Q ~ z !f1 Z N ~ o- C Z ~ ~a Ty ~' c ~ ~ t0 ^ N E Q ' c~7 N c ~ m` vri- 0-.5 ~ - U s a'mo~ e`~~~' W c m s 5 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 13, 1998 RESOLUTION 101398-3.d TO REQUEST THAT THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ADD INTO THE SECONDARY SYSTEM OF STATE HIGHWAYS NEW PORTIONS OF EXISTING ROUTE 639 (WEST RIVER ROAD) AND ROUTE 649 (DRY HOLLOW ROAD) AND ABANDON THOSE PORTIONS OF ROUTE 639 (WEST RIVER ROAD) AND ROUTE 649 (DRY HOLLOW ROAD) WHICH NO LONGER SERVE THE PUBLIC NEED. WHEREAS, Route 639, from 0.303 miles east of intersection of Route 11 and Route 460 to 0.049 miles east of Route 649, a distance of 0.376 miles, has been altered by the Virginia Department of Transportation and a new road has been constructed under Project 0639-080-201, C-501, and WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has provided the Board with a project sketch dated December 29, 1994, attached and incorporated herein as a part of this resolution, which defines additions and abandonments required in the secondary system of state highways as a result of this project, and WHEREAS, the new road serves the same citizens as served by those portions of old road identified in the project sketch to be abandoned, which portions no longer serve a public need, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add Sections #4, 5, 6, and 7, shown shaded on the project sketch, including new structure #6054, to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229 of the Code of Virginia, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby abandons Sections #1, 2, and 3, shown cross-hatched on the project sketch, including old structure #6054, which no longer serves the public need, from the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-155 of the Code of Virginia, and BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, orders that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote Moved By: Supervisor Minnix Seconded By: None Required Yeas: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson Nays: None Absent: None A Copy Teste: ~• Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Virginia Department of Transportation ,. i• ~ ~ aC w ~ N Q i• o a a ~, + o '9 N ~~ a ~ v, .. N ~I~ r~ ~,~.~ . 1 1 )% ~ --+ i ~ > z Y W w J O 1 ~Q lZ ~~ 9 1 ~ ~ I I ~ I ~ a F 1 9 ~. H 1 a' j n ~ W E try ?! oG ~ p ; O O ". o ~ v r V 9 r ~: u w ~/~ h ~1 J M ^~.. , ~ , , Kl r s ~~~ J~ O 4~ ~~ O b ~ ~ ~ C •O u ~ 2 N ~ ' 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ +r /j 1 ~ w C C 21 O Cp . ~ ~ ~ O C O O n ~ • U U ~ C/7 ~ U ~ N Q, / u ~ ~ O . ~ m ~ ~ 1 +~` U ~ ~ C ~ ± ~ 'fl O ~ ~ ~ u ~ [ ' ~ 4~ e' V ~ ,q ~ , rn ,~, cn w c ~ C ~ ~ a o 0 0 0~ •p° o Q a r ~ .. ~' C C b C Yi O ~ o ~ D ~~ O c ~ C~ a ~n v~ rn v~ U v~ ~~ e `~ . S °° a ~I~ I ~ ~t V o ~ -• Q U Z ~~; ~ \ ~ O\\ ~ ~~s ~ ~ ~, ' N SA M r ~~ 3~u" VV ~ .l ~~P~~r 20 Q- ~~ 20 N O ~ ~ ~ •~ N N U w- - ~ ° ~ ~ 'o a~ o 'o a orna~ Y Q. ~ C ~ ~ ~ C tl. 0 a~ E ,u^~ V VI Q~ N Q ~,, n~.~oti ~_ a c~v ~ C v ° U ~ C ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ O 'O N ;~` ~ C m a o N ~ Cf _N ~ C3. ~ c c • ^ N_ ~ ' n ~-m ~ m H c .~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~i O ~ ee c . 5 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 13, 1998 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution to request that the Virginia Department of Transportation add into the secondary system of state highways new portions of existing Route 639 (West River Road) and Route 649 (Dry Hollow Road) and abandon those portions of Route 639 (West River Road) and Route 649 (Dry Hollow Road) which no longer serve the public need. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) is requesting that new portions of Route 639 (West River Road) and Route 649 (Dry Hollow Road) be added to the secondary system of state highways, while certain existing portions of Routes 639 (West River Road) and 649 (Dry Hollow Road) be abandoned in order for the Commonwealth Transportation Board to obtain clear title to the underlying property and to update the mileage records. Due to the 1994 relocation and construction of Route 639, West River Road, the road alterations created sections of Routes 639 (West River Road) and 649 (Dry Hollow Road), which require acceptance into the state secondary road system. There are also sections of these routes which are portions of the old roadway and no longer serve a public need. Pursuant to approval of the Commonwealth Transportation Commissioner, VDOT has requested that the Board of Supervisors adopt a resolution in accordance with §33.1-155 to abandon the old sections of roadway and to add the new sections into the state secondary system of highways. -t SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: VDOT is requesting the additions and abandonments, per the attached sketch and as specified in the attached proposed Resolution, of portions of Route 639 (West River Road) and Route 649 (Dry Hollow Road) as a consequence of the relocation and construction of Route 639 (West River Road) which took place in 1994. Each of the new roads, as realigned, will serve the same citizens as the old roads. Once the portions of old road are abandoned, the property will be considered for conveyance by VDOT in accordance with Section 33.1-154 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended). STAFF RECOMMENDATION: County staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt the attached Resolution to add the new portions of Routes 639 and 649 as part of the secondary system of state highways and to abandon those portions of Routes 639 and 649 no longer serving a public need. SIJ~NI'ITTED BY: Ar~rakl''~ovey, Director Department of Community Developm Approved Denied Received Referred To: ACTION Motion by: 1 APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Ho ge County Administrator Harrison Johnson McNamara Minnix Nickens VOTE No Yes Abs pc: Paul Mahoney, County Attorney ~5 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON OCTOBER 13, 1998 RESOLUTION to request that the Virginia Department of Transportation add into the secondary system of state highways new portions of existing Route 639 (West River Road) and Route 649 (Dry Hollow Road) and abandon those portions of Route 639 (West River Road) and Route 649 (Dry Hollow Road) which no longer serve the public need. WHEREAS, Route 639, from 0.303 miles east of intersection of Route 11 and Route 460 to 0.049 miles east of Route 649, a distance of 0.376 miles, has been altered by the Virginia Department of Transportation and a new road has been constructed under Project 0639-080-201, C-501, and WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has provided the Board with a project sketch dated December 29, 1994, attached and incorporated herein as a part of this resolution, which defines additions and abandonments required in the secondary system of state highways as a result of this project, and WHEREAS, the new road serves the same citizens as served by those portions of old road identified in the project sketch to be abandoned, which portions no longer serve a public need, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add Sections #4, 5, 6, and 7, shown shaded on the project sketch, including new structure #6054, to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229 of the Code of Virginia, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby abandons Sections #1, 2, and 3, shown cross-hatched on the project sketch, including old structure #6054, which no longer serves the public need, from the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-155 of the Code of Virginia, and BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, orders that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. O /'1v- 0 v b P0. ~.• ~. aS Po' ~ $ ;-~ , J N 3 n ~a ~° ~~ ~I ~ ;. ~~ ~ t ~ ?' -- Q 2 v n J 4 tL t 9 a' F ~ ~ ~ o ~' ~ o 0 0" T ~ .~ ° r ~/• ~I. /1 ~~ O ~ v ~ a ~ ,~ .~ o LJ ^ ~ 7 N P N 2 LLf~ d 'C~ u r% • ~ ~ a C O C O •t~ p C o U U e~3 ~ N ~'a ~ u ~ p p o a) o ~. ~' ~° gU o ~ ~ . ~ m ~ ~' ~C g „' ~ U OG ~ e ° '° •v g o O '0 0 ~ D ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p~ ~ L U O O ~ ~ V ~ V] ~ ~ r/ j ~ ] 0 V I 0 p 0 q • ° O c a ~ p r y .. o ~ C 2] C 17 C ~i O ~ U V 0 a rid v~ rn ~ U ~ w M • . C `o ~ a 7 . . `µ ~a ` "' ~ ..I _i !?~,~ a _- ~~~ za ~ o- zw .~: ~ •~ \ ~\\ ~ ~ • w~..~ \ s' ~~~ N ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ 3~h GV 3~ 4~ c~ Qe ~~ 20 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ •~ '~ N 2'i `-- - ~ ° ~ ~ 'o a~ •o a O N Q ~ Ya~c ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ d w N ~ p~p ~ •~~ UN t~/1 Q. L ~ a m oti ~Q ~ ~ _`~~ A ~ ~ C ~~j ~ c 9 ~ = C ^ O ~~ ~c ~ ~ ~ ~o ~' ~ ~ •m ~` a~~ ~ ~ a.. ~ C ~ O "ps ~o ~ ~ ~,, c ° ~~~~ ~ , ~ c~ ~~ _ ~ v o ~' y H ~ ~ tff ~ ~ 1 a~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 13, 1998 RESOLUTION 101398-3.e TO REQUEST THAT THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ADD INTO THE SECONDARY SYSTEM OF STATE HIGHWAYS NEW PORTIONS OF EXISTING ROUTE 615 (STARLIGHT LANE) AND ABANDON THOSE PORTIONS OF ROUTE 615 WHICH NO LONGER SERVE THE PUBLIC NEED. WHEREAS, Route 615, from 0.90 miles south of Route 613 to 1.00 miles south of Route 613, has been altered by the Virginia Department of Transportation and a new road has been constructed under Project 0615-080-230, M-501, 8-671, and WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has provided the Board with a project sketch dated October 12, 1994, depicting the additions and abandonments required in the secondary system of state highways as a result of this project, which sketch is attached hereto and is hereby incorporated herein by reference, and WHEREAS, the new road serves the same citizens as those portions of old road identified by the sketch to be abandoned and those segments no longer serve a public need, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add Sections #3 and #4, shown shaded on the project sketch, including new structure #6021, to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229 of the Code of Virginia, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby abandons Sections #1 and #2, shown cross-hatched on the project sketch, including old structure #6021, as part of the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-155 of the Code of Virginia, and BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote Moved By: Supervisor Minnix Seconded By: None Required Yeas: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson Nays: None Absent: None A Copy Teste: Mary H. AI en, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Virginia Department of Transportation R y_^~ `~~ / ~~`(~ O ~, ~ ' Q O \\ ~ \ ~",~j` • \ ~j~ ~.9 F= tr1 I w ~ ~ ~~;Q • ~. ~. ~~ .`_ r ~ ~. ~•. -~ ~ .~ ~~ ~4 ~~~, v~j '' , b~ 1~, ,:y ~, -~~• ~~ C1 7! n ~~• I i 0.. ~~ v ~ --~ ~, ~.: ~ r W N !J O W O v7 T c ~ m ~ c U o U ~ C C fit ~ ~ ~ ~ U O m ~~ ~~ (U ~ -v_ o N N ~ d ~ 4! ~ p ~ 9 d ~-- ~.. ~ 1~y' Cpl vi O b ~ ~ o C ~ .y ~ O V y ~ N ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~f./ y O O ~ 'rJ' ~+'si ~ . ~ . ~ ~ ~ CJ ~ N ~ O ~ U O 6J ~Q U U CEO ~ N ~ u Ra O O y~ O '^ C ~' N ~ cb0 O ~ O J 0 ~ !ems ~ ~ ~ R ~ N N U L ~ ~ o O p U U 3 O 'C V] ~ ~ C/1 C Vl G O ~ O O O O ~ 'p W •a :: G C C y ~ o ~ a ~+ E ~i ~ ~' $ o ~ a cn cn ~ cn U ~ e`° . ~ ° ,z F a ,;. V / ~ e' .~ \ ~~ ~~ '^~,. e "~ u~ ~Q a c~ a- ~~ S ~ • ~ `~l ~ ° E c~ V N C N O ~p U •Q N ~. 3 p ~p C1. p fA f2 ~ fY0 U-.~ U f ll ~' ~ ~ ~`+. n0 (U ~ In fT U U t+~f Q~ N N f- fnat cts a~ dmo~i ~ia ^ ~ O ~ a ~ ~-~ w o ._ m~w~ ~ ~a d-~o R1 G . O~ 5 s ACTION # ,~ ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 13, 1998 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution to request that the Virginia Department of Transportation add into the secondary system of state highways new portions of existing Route 615 (Starlight Lane) and abandon those portions of Route 615 which no longer serve the public need. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) is requesting that new portions of Route 615 (Starlight Lane) be added to the secondary system of state highways, while certain existing portions of Route 615 (Starlight Lane) be abandoned in order for the Commonwealth Transportation Board to obtain clear title to the underlying property and to update the mileage records. Due to the 1994 relocation and construction on Route 615, Starlight Lane, the orad alterations created sections of Route 615 which require acceptance into the state secondary road system. There are also sections of this route which are portions of the old roadway and no longer serve a public need. Pursuant to approval of the Commonwealth Transportation Commissioner, VDOT has requested that the Board of Supervisors adopt a resolution in accordance with §33.1-155 to abandon the old sections of roadway and to add the new sections into the state secondary system of highways. VDOT is requesting the additions and abandonments, per the attached sketch and as specified in the attached proposed Resolution, of portions of Route 615 (Starlight Lane) as a consequence of the relocation and construction of Route 615 which took place in 1994. The new road, as realigned, will serve the same citizens as the old road. Once the portions of old road are abandoned, the property will be considered ,T-(o road. Once the portions of old road are abandoned, the property will be considered for conveyance by VDOT in accordance with §33.1-154 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended). STAFF RECOMMENDATION: County staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt the attached Resolution to add the new portions of Route 615 (Starlight Lane) as part of the secondary system of state highways and to abandon those portions of Route 615 no longer serving a public need. BM~ITTED BY: A~old Covey, Director Department of Community Develo ment APPROVED BY: .~/ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( )Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied Received Referred To: Harrison Johnson McNamara Minnix Nickens pc: Paul Mahoney, County Attorney AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGII~IIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON OCTOBER 13, 1998 RESOLUTION to request that the Virginia Department of Transportation add into the secondary system of state highways new portions of existing Route 615 (Starlight Lane) and abandon those portions of Route 615 which no longer serve the public need. WHEREAS, Route 615, from 0.90 miles south of Route 613 to 1.00 miles south of Route 613, has been altered by the Virginia Department of Transportation and a new road has been constructed under Project 0615-080-230, M-501, B-671, and ' WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has provided the Board with a project sketch dated October 12, 1994, depicting the additions and abandonments required in the secondary system of state highways as a result of this project, which sketch is attached hereto and is hereby incorporated herein by reference, and WHEREAS, the new road serves the same citizens as those portions of old road identified by the sketch to be abandoned and those segments no longer serve a public need, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add Sections #3 and #4, shown shaded on the project sketch, including new structure #6021, to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229 of the Code of Virginia, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby abandons Sections #1 and #2, shown cross-hatched on the project sketch, including old structure #6021, as part of the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-155 of the Code of Virginia, and BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. A ~,~ ~L \~ ~, ~ ~ U ~~~ ~ V A ~. \ -!',~ \ ~ • ~j ~ . . ~~h ~ ~ ~: ~ c~ c1- ~. ~ J ~ i ~~ p `D ``~ O . ~. ', ~~ `\ ``- ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~7 O ~j, ~y d ~1j, ~~,~,`~ . ~ ~~. ~~o ~;; ~~ G ~l , Q ~. C i ?_ `-~l _..~ r a- ~;, r z~~ iJ O W O w 7 ~~ ~K ~ h d +- ,~ o T C ~ (0 ~ c ~ o U ~ ~~ ~~ ~' cv ~o m o ~' c ~ a~ ~° v o N ~ ~ ~a~ a .n v v ~ O o • 'b N V ~ U 2 ~ N ~ ~ .~ ~ .~ o 0 0 A O O v U C = r A A '~ V 7 ~ ~ Q c Ud cC a~ O ] C C Ri O o y •J O ~°U ~ ~o .~ ~ O $ ~ i ~ a g ' °'n ~ O ~ O ~ q b a~ o a i ,G u O t ~~1 ~ (9 E d a c 3 ~; ~ ~ 0 " 00 ~ U U 3 j~ O b V fn V] G ~ q O a o O O O~ •p O ,Q '• L. G C ~ ~ - O ~ i i ~' j '•~ U w ~ v i i v i v U cn ~h ~~ =a ~o , ~~ E o O ~~i ~~ 4.. ~~ ~i, U Q O 6' 9 ~~ ~~ ~' . ~ `, F. ~ ~'~ ~ o Uf ~~oE ~ ~ ~ I~_N N~ '~° f°~•o ~ m ~ooo. o N am ~ ~ :~, ~c a a~ c af0i ~` ~ ~ n ~ o. o ~ aci Ern •~~ vfn a~~~~ ca a ~' a m o ~i 0 o O ~~ n ~ N m o~ m~w~ E ~a r ~a o `~ m •c . rn T Co n-i July 28, 1998 GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA of General Amount Fund Revenues Beginning Balance at July 1, 1998 $7,993,609.14 7.75% Second installment on West County Business Park ($1,115,300.00) Balance at October 13, 1998 $6,878,309.14 Changes below this line aze for information and planning purposes only. Balance from above $6,878,309.14 West County Business Park -balance (1,057,650.00) Reserve for R.R. Donnelly - Phase II (730,700.00) $5=089,959.14 Note: On December 18, 1990, the Boazd of Supervisors adopted a goal statement to maintain the General Fund Unappropriated Balance at 6.25% of General Fund Revenues 1998-99 General Fund Revenues $103,087,232.00 6.25% of General Fund Revenues $6,442,952.00 Respectfully Submitted, s~,~.ar... ~.-~.~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance Approv y, -~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator 6.67% 4.94% M:\Finance\Common\Boazd\Gen98. WK4 s-a CAPITAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Amount Beginning Balance at July 1, 1998 $735,313.64 Projects appropriated in 1998-99 original budget Center for Research and Technology (100,000.00, Blue Ridge Parkway Interpretive Center (30,000.00; South county Pazk Development (100,000.00. North County Soccer Field (50,000.00: Police Firing Range (50,000.00, Courthouse Renovations (75,000.00 McDonald Farm (100,000.00 Balance at October 13, 1998 $230,313.64 ote: $100,000 of these funds have been temporarily advanced to the Mayflower Hills Park project. Respectfully Submitted, ~~~ ~.~~ Approved By, Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator M:\Finance\Common\Boazd\Cap98.WK4 /'/- 3 RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Amount From 1998-99 Original Budget $210,000.00 June 23, 1998 Roanoke Valley Convention & Visitors Center (107,500. Sept 8, 1998 Contribution to TAAP Transitional Living Center (9,650. Balance at October 13, 1998 $92,850.00 Respectfully Submitted, q~ ~. Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance Approved By, ~ ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator M:\Finance\Common\Board\Board98.WK4 M:\Finance\Common\Boazd\Schoo198.WK4 ~. Cnnu~tg of ~attnnke ~" 5 ~ r.~ OF ROANp~~ ~, ~ ~ ~ z ~ ~ 2 a` 1838 DECLARING THE WEEK OF OCTOBER 18 TNROtiGN OCTOBER 24,1998 AS YWCA WEEK WITNOt1T VIOLENCE WNEREAS, the YWCA Week Without Violence, a public awareness campaign led by the YWCA, falls on October 18 through October 24,1998; and WNEREAS, the YWCA, the oldest women's membership movement in the United States, bas a long history of empowering women and families, fostering racial justice, and preventing violence; and WNEREAS, the YWCA represents more than two million women, girls, and their families through 336 local member associations with programs in thousands of communities in all 50 states; and WNEREAS, the YWCAs across the country provide a wide range of programs and sewices including: buttered women's shelters and counseling, residence for women and children, child care, support to victims of rape and sexual assault, job training, sports and fitness, and legal advocacy; and WHEREAS, the campaign will focus unprecedented attention on practical and sustainable alternatives to violence at YWCAs, schools, community organizations, neighborhoods, and workplaces nationwide, and in 95 countries around the world; and WHEREAS, the campaign will provide a series of national and local forums that will inspire communities to work together to create effective alternatives to violence, and the YWCA Week Without Violence is a challenge to ell Americans to spend seven days without committing, condoning, or contributing to violence. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Bob L. Johnson, Chairman of the Board of Supewisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, do hereby proclaim throughout Roanoke County the week of October 1S through October 24,1998, as YWCA WEEK WITHOUT VIOLENCE Bob L. Joh on, C irman ATTEST: b`~ Mary N. Il~en, Clerk ~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ ~C O~ ROAN ~F' ~. , N G ~ .p 2 ~ J d= 1838 DECLARING SEPTEMBER 8,1998 AS P. BIICKLEY MOSS DAY IN ROANOKE COt1NTY, VIRGINIA WHEREAS, P. Buckley Moss is recognized throughout the world for her artwork, and has received numerous honorary doctorates and degrees from universities and colleges; and WHEREAS, P. Buckley Moss bas been appointed as the Cultural laureate of the Commonwealth of Virginia; and WHEREAS, P. Buckley Moss overcame the burden and stigma of dyslexia, using her art as a means of communicating her love of children and family; and WHEREAS, Ms. Moss is also known for her work on behalf of children with special needs, particularly those suffering ftom dyslexia, and has founded, with her husband, Malcolm Henderson, the P. Buckley Moss Foundation for Children's Education and the P. 6uckley Moss Society to help address those needs ; and WHEREAS, Ms. Moss has spent many hours working with students in schools throughout Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, Ms. Moss, on October 8, 1998, spoke with special education students at Northside Middle School in Roanoke County, Virginia and taught an art class in her efforts to promote understanding of learning disabilities. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Bab L. Johnson, Chairman of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors do hereby proclaim Thursday, October 8,1998 as "P. Bt1CKLEY MOSS DAY" Ih Roanoke COUhty, Vlr$Ihia; ahd (~u~~ct~ of ~o~nn~e Ft1RTNER, the Board of Supervisors expresses its grateful appreciation for the time, ehergy and understanding that Ms. Moss has given to children all over the world, ^ially those at Northside Middle Sc. col. i~ Bub Johnso , bairman ATTEST: Mary N. Allen, Clerk T°h ~,5 ~~ r ACTION N0. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 13, 1998. AGENDA ITEMS: Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investments and Portfolio Policy, as of September 30, 1998. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: BANKERS ACCEPTANCE: CRAIGIE 5,796,397.72 C RESTAR 990, 382.22 NATIONS 1,805,706.25 S U NTRUST 1, 993, 954.06 WACHOVIA 990,850.00 WHEAT 1ST UNION 990,159.72 12,567,449.97 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSITS: FIRST AMERICAN 100,000.00 SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA SAVINGS & LOAN 100,000.00 200,000.00 COMMERICAL PAPER NATIONS 1,992,394.99 PAINE-WEBBER 1,986,046.67 SUNTRUST 2,972,830.00 WACHOVIA 3,044,905.61 WHEAT 1ST UNION 2,967,444.44 12,963,621.71 GOVERNMENT: JC BRADFORD 2,000,000.00 NATIONS 1,001,665.75 3,001,665.75 LOCAL GOVT INVESTMENT POOL: GENERAL FUND 10,231,367.91 RESOURCE AUTHORITY 1,740,795.69 11,972,163.60 MONEY MARKET: CRESTAR 9,393,735.51 9,393,735.51 Pg. 1 OF 2 ACTION N0. ^ ~ ITEM NUMBER IV '' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 13, 1998. AGENDA ITEMS: Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investments and Portfolio Policy, as of September 30, 1998. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: CASH INVESTMENTS: WACHOVIA COMMONWEALTH COMMONWEALTH LB&T TOTAL (GEN. OPER) (RES. AUTH.) 2, 000, 000.00 5,162,109.70 5, 308, 339.63 2, 000, 000.00 14.470.449.33 64, 569, 085.87 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Respectfully Submit d by r C. Ande son County Treasurer ACTION Approved ()Motion by: Denied 11 Approv by: /y"' E mer C. H dge County Administrator Received ( ) Referred ( ) To () Harrison Johnson McNamara Minnix Nickens VOTE No Yes Abs ACTION N0. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 13, 1998 AGENDA ITEM: Work Session with the Rescue Chiefs concerning charging for EMS Calls COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: At a work session with the Board of Supervisors on March 24, 1998, the Board and staff discussed the issue of charging for EMS calls to generate additional revenue to fund staff, equipment and facilities. We asked Fire and Rescue Chief Rick Burch to study the issue and meet with the Rescue Chiefs to bring back a report and recommendation in six months. Attachment 1 is a study prepared by staff on how other localities handle this issue. Attachment 2 is a report from the Rescue Chiefs Board; and Attachment 3 is a letter from the Vinton First Air Crew. This time has been scheduled for a work session to discuss the results of the staff study and the report from the Rescue Chiefs Board. Joe Coyle (Cave Spring Rescue), who serves as Chair of the Rescue Chiefs Board and Chief Leroy Bibb (Clearbrook Rescue), who chaired this committee will make the presentation from the Rescue Chiefs Board. It has been estimated that a net revenue of $500,000 could be generated from charging for EMS calls. These funds, while they would be appropriated to the General Fund, would be used to hire additional fire and rescue staff and improve equipment and facilities. It is anticipated that there will be minimal staff expense to administer the fee because the billing could be handled through the hospitals. Roanoke County has no intention of pursuing collection of the payment from anyone who would be unable to pay them. Most charges would be covered by health insurance. Concern has also been expressed from the Rescue Chiefs Board about a possible reduction of contributions to the volunteer organizations. Information from their audits may be used to hold them harmless. I would like to develop a plan based on successful programs in other localities. I recommend that the County staff and the Rescue Chiefs continue to develop a program and address the Rescue Chiefs concerns. We will bring the issue back for consideration in the 1999-2000 budget process. ~-~ Respectfully Submitted by: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: VOTE No. Yes Abs Harrison _ _ Johnson _ _ McNamara_ _ _ Minnix _ _ _ Nickens ATTACHMENT 1 e_i U 'O ~ T C U ~ C O ~U W Y N E c l1A ~ O O ~ N O ~ C t U is T ~ C N N C C 7 ~ U U v is ~ L W ~"' VI C N L6 d N 0 rn 0 N U Z N V ~ r U ~ C ~ y U o~ d ~ Y W ~ 0 `o ~ ~o t0 C t o U T N C N ~ ~ O ~U U ,o m c L m N C N E r a m 0 0 O 0 O 0 N O M h O V f0 ~ r ~ C a O N r N N ~:_~. ~ti':':':': 3E r O O O ~'~~:~. W:.::::::: R.'. 7 d cio a>i7 N W fp .C..... '~'!~':',rr ... . i ~ a yy v e L 6~ 0 G A p 'o O o OOf m M ~'~-~:~:~:~:~ ~.'H:~:~..... d g O. q .. d d > A O~ C N N ^ N N .. .. '.'. ~.~lO:~: ~O.'. pXp ' u`~ 9 p '''':~~~~: p p~: ~: e v a d ~ C c : p. : : Uj :. +r:::... .:. d Ol d L C Y a d of c ~ O 0 O 0 O 0 h .~.. ... ..fa :. '~~'~'~~~~~~~~~~: u N ~ ~ m N ~ c o~ 7 o o o w r N: ~ ' 'V'' tp':.. ~.:.;... /~ 5~4:~:~.... G ~C V'O > m N A N M N i1:~: ~:~ q ~: .~: c~ .~ . ~ ~~ . d C C Z ~ ~ ..I~Q~+. ~~~'::' .. C C A N T7 ~ C :~'fU:~:~H:~:~C~:': ~;: ~ ~ C L _~ d ~ a a d :...:. ;: :: ~Z': Z:~ ~ ~ N v v m 9 Ol r _ ~: ~: :~ ~ ~ ~.,_ O ! yy ~ h ~~ q O z{' 7. Q , r ~ •~~a~°~ ~ H ~ ~t~,~, ~1 .N... 7 A C t-,.' O d 0 CC „ O S 7~ y ~Q4 O. L Q 'O V d' .k O Q V A N O. ~ y n ~: h G C >:~;rc ,,,,~,~_..; _ p ~ ` ,,a.: _ ~'~ ;. ~~~M1' E .; $ ° ° c o 00 ~ M V A A Y N G . p C O N d ~ o U ~ d Qp o Q 3 Q 2 ~ m~ A O d q .. C L 7 ' ~' U t ' ' ° 2 ° „ 0 r i m n cvJ ~ r av g; ~TQ'y ~ q Uy N N F pG =9 n c~ r` rvvi c Y> Tn t a v a` K 2 3 r 3 a e bs ~° - ~ ,gym, : ,~ ; ~ N ,; O ~ I ATTACHMENT 2 Alternate Funding for EMS In February 1998, the Rescue Chiefs Board met with county administrator Elmer Hodge to form a committee to come up with a plan for alternate funding for EMS. The reasoning for this request was to increase funding for EMS needs. The Chief's Board formed a task force to look at this and to have a report ready by August for them and the Board of Supervisors. They appointed Dallas Leamon, Lee Bibbs, Eugene Mason, Mike Lewis, Keith Hudson from the county, and appointed by the task force as secretary and member at large Misty Gordon. The task force met in March and appointed Lee Bibbs as chairperson of this committee. The first order of business was the agreement that all members of the committee would stay neutral in their feelings of this matter since it is a highly emotional issue. The task force looked at and evaluated several different plans that are currently in effect in Virginia and outside of the state. They evaluated in detail the plan of charging insurance companies which is the currently policy with Roanoke City EMS. They also looked into the plans of other localities and found that the reasons these plans failed were due to the cost of implementing them. They were found to be less cost effective and the localities were not able to raise the funds needed. For example, the cost of having an independent company to due the billing and the low number of actual calls ran would be cost ineffective, especially in the case of charging insurance companies. The plan the task force feels would be the most cost effective for raising the capitol that is needed would ~J,.; ~~ be to charge a flat fee or a fee off of the telephone system. o-r The committee recommends the charging of a fee off of the telephone system. The reasoning behind this is that this way, all citizens would be treated equally, including those citizens in nursing homes or retirement communities where the majority of them have telephone services. Other reasons are that by charging for services this way, both the volunteer and paid personnel would be kept out of the middle of the issue and saved from doing the paperwork that would be involved. Many volunteer organizations have voiced their opinions of not wanting to do the paperwork or feeling of others misfortunes. The committee feels a fee of $25 would raise the capital needed to provide a strong EMS system. Breaking down to a $2 a month phone charge, this would also not put a large burden on the financial states of the citizens. This would raise the total capital amount to $1x150.000.00. This would also tie our agencies into the economics of the community. The question of "what if we respond to someone who doesn't live in the county" is best answered by setting a policy to bill them a $25 fee. This would be handled through the Fire and Rescue office. The other fee would be handled through the telephone company for service or a flat fee would be handled through a tax revenue service. The committee sent out questionnaires to all volunteers at EMS agencies and to Roanoke County citizens through the civic organizations. Very little response was given back from the Rescue Squads, therefore this information is incomplete at this time. o-~ The information on these billing plans will be attached in a separate facts sheet which will also show the breakdown of charging insurance companies and telephone companies. It will also show what volunteer organizations do and do not support these plans. The committee feels that for any of these plans to be implemented, Roanoke County would have to guarantee that no present funding would be cut from any organization. We also need the county to recognize a minimum of two years for public education before we implemented any of these plans. Facts Sheet ~ I 1. Roanoke County must agree not to cut current funding for a minimum of 10 years. 2. All funding collected through whatever plan that is agreed upon will be put in the EMS budget not into the general funds or any other Department funds. 3. Roanoke County must agree that these funds will be distributed in the manner decided by the Rescue Chiefs Board and input from Fire and Rescue Administrators. 4. Roanoke County must reimburse each organization for its lost revenue for implementing any of the proposed charge plans. Estimated Amount Raised on Different Plans I. Charging Insurance Companies: a Revenue raised under this plan: $546,062.20 II. Char ins off of the Telephone S stem: a. Revenue raised under this plan: $1,150,000.00 III. Flat Tax: a .Revenue raised under this plan: $607,143.00 (based on a $25 dollar fee and a population of 85,000 citizens). ~-I The Positive and Negative Aspects of Charging for EMS I Char. ing_Insurance Companies A. Positive Affects 1. The positive side of charging the insurance company is that this is money that may not come from each individuals income. B. NegLative Aspects 1. Roanoke County would have to pay an individual company to bill for this service. 2. There would be a lot of paperwork to be filled out and both the paid and volunteer personnel would be placed right in the middle of the billing process. 3. It would also put the paid and volunteer personnel into the gain of others misfortunes. 4. The majority of the County Volunteer Rescue Squads have voiced their opinions that they do not support this plan at all. 5. Less money would be raised through this plan than the others. 6. Approximately 60°Io of money raised would be collectable. II. Charing Telephone Companies A. Positive Aspects 1. This is a way to collect from nursing home and other individuals who may not pay taxes. 2. This plan would probably have less effect on loss of funds from personal donations to the Rescue Squads. 3. This plan would tie the Fire/Rescue agencies into the economics of the county. n-~ 4. This plan would keep the paid and volunteer personnel out of the middle of billing and the subsequent paperwork. 5. More revenue would be brought in through the use of this plan. B. Negative Aspects 1. The permission through the House of Delegates through the passing of a bill which would be very time consuming. 2. There would be a fee from the telephone companies for their collection of the money. 3. There would be an additional $2 a month charge on each customers phone bill. III. Flat Tax for EMS service A. Positive Aspects 1. By billing this way, the payment is guaranteed. 2. This plan would keep paid and volunteer personnel out of the middle of billing and the subsequent paperwork. B. Negative Aspects 1. This plan would cause a new tax for the citizen to have to pay. 2. This plan would result in a tremendous loss in personal donations. 3. Roanoke County would have to pay a fee to its own tax collectors. Out of all of these plans, the committee feels that the telephone charging system would be the most desired. The second best plan would be the flat tax. There is no support for charging insurance companies. ~~ Time to Implement Any Charge for EMS Plan It would take approximately 18 to 24 months to implement any of the mentioned plans. The use of this time would be for: 1. Education of the public of how this system would work, what the monies would be monies would be used for, and how this would benefit the citizens. 2. Education of the paid and volunteer personnel on the plan. 3. The time it would- take for planning and the actual implementation of the plan would be approximately 8 to 12 months. 4. Systems that have failed in other localities is because of not taking the time to educate both the public and the organizations. There are documented cases where charging for EMS has failed for both volunteer and paid systems due to this exact reason. How Funds Will Be Used "Proposal of The Funds Committee" o-i This conunittee will be made up of a board of Head EMS Chiefs, one Chief at Large, one Volunteer County Chief, one staff member and one citizen at large. The committee will meet on a quarterly basis to decide on how the funds will be used. It will take a vote of 50 to 1 to agree upon the use of the funds and then be presented to the Chief's board at their regular meeting. The committee will also be responsible for the budget yeazly. o-i . Proposed Budget Allocations of Money From Charging for EMS 1. The purchase of 5 new ambulances. 2. The building of 4 new stations to be manned from Gam to 6pm for EMS. 3. Staffing for Station 6 from Gam to 6pm. 4. The purchase of soft supplies and a warehouse for use by all Roanoke County agencies. 5. The payment of oxygen use by EMS. 6. To provide maintenance on all crew owned vehicles. 7. To offset lost income of individual EMS organizations. 8. To pay for debts that organizations are currently paying for. 9. To add 24hr. ALS coverage for both North and South county. 10. To increase the budget for Paid and Volunteer Training. 11. The construction of bunk-rooms to agencies that do not have them. ~"`"a ATTACHMENT 3 ~ ' ~ VINTO>,~ r trc~ t AlU c.:KEW INCORPORATED P.O. BOX 314 VINTON, VIRGINIA 24179 October 3, 1998 Lee Bibbs, Chairman Charge for Call Committee c/o Clearbrook Rescue Squad p,n, Lox 8464 Roanoke, VA 24014 Dear Lee: p Z :.. 4 o-~ The Vinton First Aid Crew, Inc. would like to make the following statements, in reference to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors decision to implement some form of charge for services. At the past business meetings of the Crew and the Board of Directors, the following decisions were made: The organization does not support the proposed plans for charge for call due to the following reasons: • There were no set guidelines for funding... discussion lead to believe that operations would be funded, but there is not guarantee as to the way it would be handled • As the discussion was had, funds received would be placed in a general fund account, that could be used to fund an operation in the County government, not a fund, such as an enterprise fund to be used to operate the EMS/Rescue division • There were no plans offered to upgrade facilities to support the added expectations for service, that normally happens when you charge for service • There was no element of funding stated to recoup lost fund drive monies, which all crews use to assist in provision of services not funded by the government MEMBER VIRGINIA STATE ASSOCIATION OF RESCUE SQUADS, INC. page 2...charge for call issue It is agreed that eventually, there will be some form of fee for service, that will have to be implemented, but there needs to be a lot of consideration as to how this shall be done, especially when the service that has to beg for funding and equipment, becomes a fund generator for the local government. If you should ha~~e any ~uestiors, do^.'t hesitate to call. Thank you, ~~ Christopher Stull, Rescue Chief Vinton First Aid Crew, Inc. cc: Joe Coyle, Chairman -Roanoke County Rescue Chiefs Board Richard Burch, Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Department Chief Elmer Hodge, Roanoke County Adminstrator Harry Nickens, Roanoke County Board of Supervisors -Vinton District Charles Hill, Vinton Town Mayor Clay Goodman, Vinton Town Manager Tom Philpott, President -Vinton First Aid Crew, Inc. o-~ w ACTION # ITEM NUMBER a '° AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 13, 1998 AGENDA ITEM: Work Session for the County of Roanoke Six Year Secondary System Construction Plan for Fiscal Year 1999 through 2005 and review of the Revenue Sharing Priority List for FY99-00. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: In accordance with Section 33.1-70.01 of the Code of Virginia and the policy of the Virginia Department of Transportation, the Board of Supervisors is requested to revise and update the Six Year Secondary Road Construction Plan every year. The County staff and representatives of the Virginia Department of Transportation have requested this work session to review and finalize the proposed plan. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Six Year Construction Plan and the Revenue Sharing Priority List for FY99-00, will be provided to you at the work session for your review and discussion. This plan, developed jointly by VDOT and County staff, was developed by reviewing the current construction plan and requests received by both County citizens and the Board of Supervisors during the past two years. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: No fiscal impact to County funds is involved. .~ .~ STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors conduct a work session on the Six Year Secondary Road Construction Plan for FY1999-2005 and Revenue Sharing Priority List for FY99-00 in order that it may be finalized and advertised for a Board of Supervisors Public Hearing meeting on November 17, 1998. APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge Department of Community Development County Administrator ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE Approved () Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied () Harrison Received () Johnson _ Referred McNamara To Minnix / l / % A no d Covey, Director Nickens 2 SUBMITTED BY: F ~ TABLE OF CONTENTS AGENDA PAGE(S) 1. SIX YEAR SECONDARY CONSTRUCTION PLAN FOR FY 99-05 a. INTRODUCTION 1 b. COUNTYWIDE ITEMS 2 - CHILDREN AT PLAY SIGN POLICY 2-3 - RURAL ADDITION PRIORITY LIST 4-6 - NEW RURAL ADDITION POLICY 7-10 c. INCIDENTAL CONSTRUCTION ITEMS 10 d. NUMBERED PROJECTS 10 1. PROJECTS SCHEDULED TO RECEIVE 11-22 FUNDING IN FY 99100 (NOT COMPLETED) 2. PROJECTS ADDED/REVISED 23-26 3. PROJECTS CONSIDERED/NOT ADDED 27 e. VDOT'S SIX-YEAR ROAD PLAN 28-33 2. REVENUE SHARING FOR FY 99-00 a. INTRODUCTION 34 b. REVENUE SHARING PRIORITY LIST AND MAPS 35-80 c. PROJECTS CONSIDERED/NOT ADDED 81 d. VDOT'S REVENUE SHARING FORM 82-88 COUNTY OF ROANOKE SIX YEAR SECONDARY CONSTRUCTION PLAN FOR FY 1999 THRU 2005 1. a. INTRODUCTION: Roanoke County and the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) are continuously reviewing and updating the six-year plan. Staff receives requests throughout the year concerning secondary roads in Roanoke County. The requests are reviewed and classified as maintenance or construction. Maintenance items are normally referred to VDOT's resident engineer by letter, or verbally, for correction. Construction requests are put on file to be reviewed during the six-year plan and revenue sharing yearly updates. These requests normally require additional funding and/or engineering. VDOT and Roanoke County staff have reviewed and evaluated each request for inclusion in the six-year plan (revenue sharing program). In deciding which projects would be included, staff considered traffic counts, existing and future development, pavement conditions, drainage, safety, and the economic benefit. We cannot fund all the requests received due to budget constraints; therefore, we have prioritized the requests based upon the criteria above. Roanoke County received additional funding last year due to the recent changes in legislation. As you may or may not know the Commonwealth contributes more into the Federal Transportation funds than we receive. Recently, this percentage has been reduced to approximately 10%; therefore, we are receiving approximately 90% of the funds back into the State of Virginia for highway related projects. Roanoke County's allocation this year is estimated to be approximately $3.5 million and $2.8 million per year over the next five years. Even with the increase in funding, we need to be selective and supportive of the projects we identify on the six-year plan. Staff has included roads that are substandard and have a high, or a potentially high, traffic counts due to proposed or existing development. The Board of Supervisors is required by state law to review and update the six-year plan every other year. However, due to the funding changes several years ago, originally ISTEA now TEA-21, VDOT has requested, that the Board of Supervisors update the plan every year. There are three funding categories in the six-year plan: COUNTYWIDE ITEMS, INCIDENTAL ITEMS, AND NUMBERED PROJECTS. Unpaved roads are included under numbered projects. Staff will attempt to summarize each category and project on the following pages: 1 r. 1. b. COUNTYVNIDE ITEMS: Items included in this category are traffic signs, entrance culverts and rural addition roads. Roanoke County's rural addition list (pages 3 and 4) is still very long. We have included the maximum ($175,000) allowed by state law. An additional $225,000 has been allocated to handle traffic signs and entrance culverts for a total budget of $400,000. In addition, the general assembly adopted a new policy for the installation of a new sign alerting motorist children may be at play nearby and funds for these signs are included under this budget item. VDOT and Roanoke County's policy follows for your information and approval. This is a working policy and changes may have to be made periodically. WATCH FOR CHILDREN BACKGROUND: The purpose of this report is to inform the Board of Supervisors and general public of Roanoke County and VDOT's policy on the installation of "Watch for Children" sign. The 1997 General Assembly enacted an amendment to the Code of Virginia, adding Section 33.1-210.2 regarding the installation and maintenance of signs alerting motorist children may be at play nearby. In accordance with this law, effective July 1, 1997, counties may request the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) to install and maintain these signs. II. VDOT'S PROCESS: The following process has been established by VDOT: a. A resolution shall be submitted to VDOT for each request. b. The resolution shall include the source of funding for the installation of the sign. The cost to install the sign today is approximately $150.00. This cost will change periodically due to inflation. c. The resolution will also explain the preferred location of the sign; however, VDOT reserves the right to make the final determination. d. Upon receipt of the resolution, the resident engineer, with assistance from the district traffic engineer as necessary will conduct a review of the request and approve/disapprove within thirty days. e. The sign shall be in accordance with the design standards. 2 The only other guideline is the signs shall be installed primarily on secondary roads within residential areas. Any requests to install such a sign on a primary road will require approval from the state traffic engineer in Richmond. Basically, 90% of all the Roads in Roanoke County would qualify under VDOT's guidelines. To eliminate numerous requests and to save staff time, we would like to add additional requirements (discussed below) with your approval. Staff has consulted with VDOT and formulated the following procedure for your consideration. III. ROANOKE COUNTY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES: a. The street is classified as a minor collector or local road. No signs will be installed on a major collector or arterial highway. Typically these signs will be installed at transitions from major collectors to minor collectors and from minor collectors to local streets. b. A petition is signed by at least 75% of the property owners along the street. For long streets, signatures shall be required within 1000 ft of the requested sign location. c. The property owners agree to pay 50% of the costs at the time of installation. Today's estimate to purchase the sign and install is $150.00 total; therefore, the homeowners would pay $75.00 this year. Again, this figure may need to be adjusted periodically due to inflation. The remainder shall come from our secondary six-year construction funds under the category Countywide construction. d. The street must have a minimum traffic count of 200 vpd or twenty lots. The minimum distance between signs is 1000 feet. Relatively short streets (dead-ends) would not receive consideration. In general, residential streets with through traffic would be a higher priority and a sign would be installed at the major points of ingress and egress. e. Other streets to be considered regardless of traffic count would be streets adjacent to a public park, parallel streets in the vicinity of schools, and any other public facility were children frequent. f. Staff presents the request(s) (approvedldisapproved) and resolution to the Board semi-annually, typically December and July. The Community Development Department must receive all submittals at least thirty days in advance of the Board meeting. VDOT's Traffic Engineer will make the final determination if a sign is installed; however, if the guidelines above are met, there is a greater possibility the sign will be installed. 3 RURAL ADDITION UPDATE The following is a review of each road staff worked on or is working on: Signatures for ROW have finally been acquired for LAKEDALE ROAD and staff will be submitting this project to VDOT within the next couple of months. Work should begin sometime next summer or fall. The residents on CABIN CREEK DRIVE were unwilling to pursue State acceptance due to various reasons and staff is requesting the Board to officially remove Cabin Creek Drive from the list. Staff discovered LAWYER DRIVE was ineligible due to a note on the Subdivision plat. Staff has agreed to complete the design work and determine a construction estimate to bring the road into compliance with state standards. Staff is about a month behind on this project but we will be completing this request as soon as possible. Staff is currently working on AUTUMN DRIVE ROAD & BLUEBIRD LANE. Already we have encountered right-of-way problems on BLUEBIRD LANE but we are trying to work through with the property owners. One of the original signatures on the petition is unwilling to donate the necessary land to tie Bluebird Lane into the existing state road. Speculative interest exists on AUTUMN DRIVE but the property owners have agreed to pay this cost. Staff anticipates surveying to start within the next month and a rough design to be completed early next spring. At that time, staff will present the information to the homeowners and request ROW donations. Once the deeds are recorded staff will present the road package to the Board to be forwarded to VDOT for construction. Both AUTUMN DRIVE ROAD & BLUEBIRD LANE are on the same time line. The residents on EMPIRE LANE agreed to pay a portion of the construction cost and this road was taken into the system this past year. VDOT completed the work last month. Due to the problems we have encountered the past several years and our long list, staff is contemplating (with Board approval) revising our rural addition policy (enclosed on page's 7 - 10). RURAL ADDITIONS ADDED BROYLES LANE, PRIORITY # 21 TOWNSEND ROAD, PRIORITY # 22 4 RURAL ADDITION PRIORITY LIST FAMILIES PROBLEMS *ESTIMATED ROAD DISTANCE SERVED SEEN COST (1) Autumn Dr. 700' 3 Right-of-way and drainage $150,000 easement required. Speculative interest. (2} Bluebird Ln. 3400' 9 Drainage easement required. $340,000 Speculative interest. (3) Creekside Dr. 1100' 3 18% grade. Speculative $130,000 interest. (4) Artrip Ln. 300' 4 Right-of-way and drainage $ 40,000 easement required. (5) Smokey Ridge Rd. 800' 6 Right-of-way and drainage $120,000 easements required. Turnaround area may be a problem. Private property damage. (6) Indian Hill Rd. 1300' 4 Right-of-way and drainage $130,000 easements required. Speculative interest. (7) Hemlock Ave. 1500' S Right-of-way and drainage $150,000 easements required. Significant private property damage. (8) Raintree Rd. 2600' 15 Right-of-way and drainage $325,000 easements required. Adjacent to Parkway. (9) Chestnut Mtn. Cir. 500' 6 Right-of-way and easements $50,000 required. (10) Southview Dr. 800' S Right-of-way and easements $80,000 required. (11) Williams Ave. 300' 6 Right-of-way easements $30,000 required. (12) Lucado St. 700' 5 Right-of-way easements $87,500 required. (13) Kathryn Dr. 790' 4 ROW required, stream $79,000 crossing and difficult horizontal alignment. (14) Cowman Rd. 400' 4 ROW required, homes $80,000 close to road. (15) Harmony Ln. 900' 8 Right-of-way and drainage $90,000 easement required. 5 FAMILIES PROBLEMS `ESTIMATED ROAD DISTANCE SERVED SEEN COST (16) Alcoa Rd. 1109' 8 APCO lines, row required, $160,000 stormwater management (17) Willow Valley 3600' 4 ROW required, possible $360,000 speculative interest, SWM. (18) Falling Crk. 800' 3 Adjacent to Wolf Creek, $ 80,000 ROW required, spec interest (19) Rusty Rd. 300' 7 ROW required, steep terrain, $200,000 sight distance problems. (20) Crescent Ln. 1000' 11 ROW required, spec. interest, $100,000 Woodland Ln. utility reloc. (21) P,i~.~erview Rd. 1200' S ROW required, spec, interest. $120,000 (22) Broyles Ln 500' 10 Possible citizen participation $3,000 (23) Townsend Ln 400' S Sight distance problems $20,000 TOTAL $2,014,500 `THE ESTIMATED COST IS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE ROAD ONLY. THE ESTIMATED COST DOES NOT INCL UDE: UTILITY RELOCATION, RIGHT-O F-WAY, CONS TRUCTION STAKEOUT, ENGINE ERING, OR ROCK WAL LS. THE HOMEOWNER AND/OR ROANOKE COUNTY ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THESE COSTS. 6 BACKGROUND: RURAL ADDITION POLICY There are several sections in the state code, which govern Rural Addition Roads. The sections vary depending upon the date the road was opened for public use regardless of speculative interest. All the sections require the County to adopt the Virginia Department of Transportation's (VDOT) subdivision street requirements and to not allow any future private roads. The most common section is Section 33.1-72.1, Subsection D. This section requires the road to meet the following criteria: (1 }the road has to be in use prior to July 1, 1984 (this date changes periodically) (2) a minimum of three homes must use the road and (3) 75% of the property owners living on the road must petition the County for state acceptance. The road is not eligible for state funding if the following note is on the plat: "the roads shown on this subdivision plat are private and the homeowner's association or developers are responsible for maintenance." Funds for rural addition roads are generated from our yearly six-year secondary allocation. The maximum allocation is five (5) percent of our yearly allocation. Every year, Roanoke County allocates the maximum amount because our rural addition priority list is very long and expensive. The County is responsible " for the administration of this program under VDOT guidelines. VDOT is responsible for ensuring the County complies with their subdivision ordinance and for the construction of the road once all the administrative work is completed. State secondary funds can only be used for road construction. Items included are drainage structures, pavement, guardrail, grading, erosion control, and restoration. Ineligible construction items include retaining wall, utility relocation (water, sewer, cable, electricity, and telephone), fencing and ROW acquisitions. These items are the responsibility of the homeowners, Roanoke County, or combination thereof. In general, Roanoke County's financial responsibilities include survey, design, water and sewer relocation, utility relocation (power, phone, and cable), ROW documents and recordation. The homeowner's financial responsibilities include ROW donation and speculative interest. Speculative interest is the ownership of one or more lots or the potential to create additional lots. If speculative interest exists, the homeowner is assessed a percentage of the road construction cost. Our guideline to determine and assess speculative interest is part of these standard operating procedures (SOP). Our department's monies finance the operating budget for the survey, design and deed recordation. Staff responsibilities include design, plat and deed preparation, and recordation of the deed. Any utility relocation and miscellaneous costs are funded with a capital account established for this purpose. Rollovers and cost participation from the homeowners are the source of these funds. So far we have covered our financial responsibilities. Roanoke County currently has twenty-two roads on the rural addition priority list. The price tag to upgrade these private roads to state standards is estimated to be more than two million dollars. Staff is contemplating changing our current policy. Currently, when a request is received a representative from the County sends a sample petition to the property owners and offers to meet with the .residents if requested. Staff completes a preliminary estimate of the construction work and when the petition is returned, the road is added to the end of the rural addition priority list. Staff updates the rural addition list every year at the annual Board meeting. Staff works on the roads in the order received. Rarely are priorities shifted. Some of the roads have been on the list for ten or twelve years due to financial constraints. Once the road is at the top of the list and funding is available in the secondary six-year plan then surveying, engineering and ROW is completed by Roanoke County. All of these roads must meet VDOT design criteria outlined in the Rural Local Road System manual. To meet these standards, the current road is almost always entirely rebuilt. In most cases, one property owner is affected more than the others; has to donate more ROW, or has to pay speculative interest. If the issues cannot be resolved, the road is dropped from the list only to resurface several years down the road. Below is a synopsis of our current and proposed policy. 7 II. RURAL ADDITION: CURRENT POLICY STEPS: a) Homeowners' petition Roanoke County to add their road to the rural addition priority list. b) Staff checks the road for: - Minimum of three homes per mile. - Use prior to July 1, 1984. - 75% of property owners signed the petition. - Checks subdivision plat for private road language. c) Staff adds the road to the rural addition list with a preliminary cost estimate. d) The Board officially adds the road to the list at the annual meeting. e) Once, the road is the number one priority and funds are available, staff contacts the property owners and work begins on the road. Staff completes field survey, engineering, plat and deed preparation, construction estimates, speculative interest review, and utility relocation. Problems with any of the items listed above can delay or kill the project. 2. FUNDING: a) VDOT: Road construction funds are limited to five (5) percent of our yearly secondary allocation. Construction costs include grading, pavement, drainage, guardrail, erosion control and restoration. b) Roanoke County: Administrative costs Includes: surveying, design, and ROW. Engineering and Inspections' operating budget (professional services account) covers surveying and plat recordation. County staff performs all other related work. In addition, Roanoke County covers all utility relocation. Water and sewer relocation is a combination of the road capital improvement account and the utility department. Occasionally, we have to pay 100% percent of these costs and the capital improvement account is used. Telephone poles and other underground utility relocation is also paid out of this account. This account does not receive annual funding. Rollovers and homeowner participation are the source of these funds. c) Homeowner: Cost incurred include: ROW donation, retaining walls, individual landscaping, private fence relocation, and speculative interest. III. RURAL ADDITION: PROPOSED POLICY 1. STEPS: a) Homeowners petition Roanoke County to add their road to the rural addition priority list. b) Staff checks the road for: - Minimum of three homes per mile. - In use prior to July 1, 1984. - 75% of property owners signed the petition. - Checks subdivision plat for private road language. 8 c) If the road qualifies: preliminary surveying and engineering is completed immediately. ROW, easement and speculative interest are determined. A more detailed cost estimate is determined and funding sources identified (see funding options below). Individual and collective meetings are held with all the property owners explaining the ramifications of construction. Agreements are signed by the property owners agreeing to pay speculative interest and utility relocation, donate ROW and generally approve the design of the road. d) A homeowner's association is strongly recommended by the County. A draft homeowner's agreement is given to the property owners along with a list of attorneys who handle associations. (Costs incurred: $75.00 filing fee, $300 - $500 attorney fee, and $25/year to keep in good standing.) Maintenance cost of the road will vary depending upon length and road surface. e) Staff adds the road to the rural addition list. f) The Board officially adds the road to the list at the annual meeting. g) Once, funding (construction) is available, staff finalizes the construction plans and other documents and forwards to VDOT for acceptance and construction. 2. FUNDING: a) VDOT: Road construction funding is limited to five (5) percent of our yearly secondary allocation. All costs associated with the road construction are covered, to include grading, pavement, drainage, guardrail, erosion control and restoration. b) Roanoke County: Administrative costs include; survey, design, and ROW. Community Development's operating budget (professional services account) covers surveying and plat recordation. County staff performs all other related work. Water and sewer relocation is still a combination of the road capital improvement account and the utility department. Rollover and homeowner's previous participation remains the source of these funds. c) Homeowners costs incurred include ROW donation, retaining walls, individual landscaping, private fence relocation, and speculative interest. In addition, telephone poles and other underground utility relocation is paid by the homeowners (average cost per utility pole is $5,000). IV. ADDITIONAL OPTIONS: 1) If the preliminary surveying and design prove the road cannot be built to state standards or proves losses are too extreme for the property owners to accept, the County offers: a) Assistance in establishing a homeowner's association for the maintenance of the road. Determine dues to be paid by each property owner. Supplies the homeowners with a generic agreement and refer to lawyers who handle setting up an association. Staff notifies the assessor's office of the homeowner's association and various other public agencies to restrict public access. 9 b) We offer to use the special assessment program to have the road improved (drainage, asphalt, etc.). Guidelines of the program are given to each property owner for their review. Determine construction cost and estimates of the monthly assessment. 2) Continue the current procedure, the County notifies the property owners the road will not be taken into the state's secondary system and maintenance will continue to be the homeowner's responsibility. 1. c. INCIDENTAL CONSTRUCTION: Items include minor construction which can be completed normally within one year such as: pavement overlays, drainage improvements and minor curve improvements. Again, staff has not included any funds for incidental construction in the six-year plan since all incidental items have been addressed under the revenue sharing program for this year. The use of the revenue sharing fund for incidental projects is based on the assumption that Roanoke County will participate in the revenue sharing program. If the Board decides not to participate, we will incorporate approximately $120,000 from our secondary yearly allocation to fund the prioritized projects (pages 82-88). 1. d. NUMBERED PROJECTS: The bulk of Roanoke County's allocation funds are for numbered projects. This year, staff anticipates approximately $3.1 million to be allocated toward reconstruction. The entire six- yearplan is enclosed for your review (pages 28-33). The funding has not been worked out as of this date. The budget shown is only for planning purposes. Staff is proposing two new projects be added to the six-year plan. Following is a summary of our current and proposed plan for next year: The following roads have been completed or have received sufficient funds to be completed, and no longer appear on the six-year plan: MERRIMAN ROAD/RANCHCREST DRIVE, YELLOW MOUNTAIN ROAD, and LOST MOUNTAIN ROAD are completed. 1. d. 1. PROJECTS SCHEDULED TO RECEIVE FUNDING IN FY 98/99: THE FOLLOWING ROADS ARE CURRENTLY IN THE SIX YEAR PLAN AND SHOULD RECEIVE FUNDING THIS FISCAL YEAR: The first two roads shown in the plan (Carlos Drive & Verndale Bridge replacement) either have been completed or are awaiting bids and appear in the plan for finance or administrative purposes. AGAIN, The budget for this year has not been completed and actual allocations may vary. Our allocation for unpaved roads averages around $30,000 per year. Any additional funding shown is from construction dollars. 10 V~. 2t~e`lo°h ROANOKE COUNTY :.Qa~`~ SECONDARY SYSTEM ~~' SIX YEAR ROAD PLAN Pte, r ,~~ 6 'r ~-~ s Q? rni ~cq ~o~ ~ O. d.. 'Qx R~ ~ a' lgq~ ~iA ~~. A. '~ ~, F,~ ~, X39 : ~~ h ti C~ 20 ~. ~~ ~'9 n Ra ti a Qa ti~ A Q: ~ C ~ ~~ J~a y v '' Rt.621 T° o ~o p ~°X °' a; t Ea~yo~~ a o ~ V e, a :r ~ ~a r; - *~ ^v a ~ a ~ d NQ ^' ^ ~~~ d. , 1b h ~~,. Of' ~~Q P.. p Drinndo Ay ~ ~ to °js ~ ~~ oy Dnlnny0 Av G°r` b b c` O _rt ~ a A ~ 4 ~ td A ~ A ~ ~Q. ~ ~ f' `~ Rrt ~`3 4w• °* HOLLINS ROAD PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ROANOKE COUNTY SECONDARY SYSTEM SIX YEAR ROAD PLAN w A ~-. ~0 v v v a ti io z v ~:'I 1~/ ~"- R .X ~) / ~y C, Q N FcZe S ~r a TJY t QG~ t E - c/~ C' ,G~~ .. 44p 1 ~. °~ ~~ ~ ^G~~` ~~ ~ f~X ~J L 7 ~ ~ C `J^- Y ~` ~ 1 Q ~X ~~° ~ ti o L ~ ~ ~; Q ~ ~ ~ 1438 ~~ 9 C~ y r S ,N 3 J~ ^. r~ ~, ~. =t- ~ r ~,^ ,~ ~ r ~ Ln, ~~' ~ ~ - A!~;ert Rd ~ ,~ X Alexan~e~. Dr ~ Rt. 1631 ~N~ Century Dr ~ ;~ Rt. 1451 ~ ~ ~~ Rt, 1~~ ~. o c fir = 2k ~a WOOD HAVEN ROAD PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ROANOKE COUNTY SECONDARY SYSTEM SIX YEAR ROAD PLAN OLD CAVE SPRINTG ROAD PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 1~1 <J X 1 1 1 1 1 v v L a1/ ~ ROANOKE COUNTY SECONDARY SYSTEM SIX YEAR ROAD PLAN 3 6 Rt• ~6 2~ ~ 2/ J 2 ~~ ~~ ~~ c ~~ Y ^ "~~ 72 ~ cr S ^~ ~J tib v,~ (~~I~'~;iQ~ ~:. ;~ `'x \~, Rya a Rt' 419 r. Q e~ 3~' ~~` Rrt• 1~ 21 t ~s ~ N N ~,,Q ~ ~~~nrr ~n N a o L L `=' T ~ jC V ~', ~L j ~9~ ~~ d ~~; e 4 ~S. ~ elte Meade Dr '~ ~; Rt. 1633 ~ cc 0 '`~`- V ~., \Sx ~~ ,\` •r ~ `~ f U1 ~~ N Rz• ~. 1~ J . Q~ ~'~nJ ~~ ~ ti :` ~~ ~w ~ _~~.~ Rt• 687 ~~ jS ~~ - COLONIAL AVENUE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ~~ ROANOKE COUNTY ~ SECONDARY SYSTEM SIX YEAR ROAD PLAN ~' s ~2 ~, c ~'~' R~ aQ R t, > ~~1 ~S ~~e brook R> Rc~, ^RIGINAL SCOPE L~ 'PAC ^F WORK K`,t ~~ 88 CJx~ o,~ '{v ~i ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ v- Rt~ gg8 ~, $`~,e R~a9P Parkway .~eZ ~- • ~~ ~ ,~~~ ~a'~ ~~ '~a ADDITIGNAL SCOPE OF WORK c ~= U 'pX ~~ COTTON HILL ROAD PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ROANOKE COUNTY SECONDARY SYSTEM SIX YEAR ROAD PLAN NN a+ K 4U~~ ka e~ 2 :~DJ (00 fit. r pDC<v Rq ro b ~ ^b' C Q'w C S a c a ~ ~ , y ;G d U ~ a: ~e a o- b x: b~' b ~~9 ~~, 6 p 4 Rt. '~d- c d c 0 Ut U 'Q~ ~ O 669 ~~q << w ~~ Dr ~~ . 66S c5 Rd ~~ w O PATTERS~N DRIVE aC PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ROANOKE COUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 99-00 REVENUE SHARING heron Dr R~,I p Co- Dawnrid e ~ Dr, ~ o Dq W 1p16 ~ h r~a9e Dr ~~ L a rty~, R~ 6S c 4 ti~~~ Cr°~~Oh ere ~r ~ L n ,~3~ a ~ ~X s5 r \~~ ~,~ ~,~ ~~~ qF N ~o .rod ~ ~q / ~ ~d s ° ~'~~~~ Missir~er Ct o-~g`o a ~ ~ J ~e Rd Rt,1042 `' ~o- ~ ~~ P ~ o ~h~ ~ ~ o ~ Q ~ q y4~, _ _ zb ~ ~y MU ~ SP ~r R~.~~44 __ ~r F'~r~`e~ PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ~~ 'P ~~ Ter~pte Dr Rt. 1030 ~~/' HARDY ROAD ROANOKE COUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 99-00 REVENUE SHARING ,NX ~~~ ~ ~ z~ 6~Q w ~ ~,c°' ~- a Q'° O~ ~ R d, ~e Qr~Card U ~~ Rt,l~g9 .~ `a2 ~ ~ a a. ~j ~ ~ ~ ~ +~ P~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' a o ~ 24 ti `' ~ a 21 ~~`'i9, ~~3 ~ ~~' icy ~,e~ ~d ~~ 2~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~ o- ~~ ~°~ `~~ oh ~,,~` ~~ d ,p, ~- ~Q~~ ,~~ ~9~ ~~~~~' ~ ~ Y~ Q n to d~ Qr 2d .96 R~ ~- 1 O~ ti ~,`. LAYMAN R 4AD PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 1. d. 3. ROADS CONSIDERED BUT NOT ADDED (INSUFFICIENT FUNDSI CARVINS COVE DAM ROAD: Frontage road adjacent to interstate 81 at the end of Plantation Road. Future commercial potential. INDIAN HEAD ROAD: Replace existing low water bridge on BOHON HOLLOW ROAD. As stated last year, bridge records indicate the bridge is in fair condition. HONEYSUCKLE ROAD: This is an unpaved road and only a short section of road meets the minimum vehicles per day requirement. Staff will continue to monitor traffic counts. CROWELL GAP ROAD: Updated traffic counts were insufficient. MONCAP TRAIL: Unpaved road which does not meet minimum vehicles per day. TWO FORD ROAD HARDY ROAD HERSHBERGER ROAD. VIEW AVENUE. POPLAR DRIVE MANASSAS DRIVE AND FRANKLIN STREET were evaluated, but not considered a high priority at this time. Staff will review these projects in the field to determine if revenue sharing funds could be utilized to correct the worst areas. TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT TECHNOLOGY DRIVE (VALLEY TECH PARKI VDOT has notified us that the intersection does not warrant a traffic light based upon the existing traffic counts. GLENMARY DRIVE This frontage road is part of the State's Primary and Interstate System and any funding to upgrade this road would come from the Primary and Interstate Six Year Plan. Revenue sharing funds or industrial access funds are not authorized for this road, unless we request Glenmary Drive to become a secondary road. Staff is working with economic development, VDOT and potential consultants to review funding options. There is a "limited access line" associated with this road which may cause problems. If revenue sharing is an option, we may need to adjust this year's prioritized list. CARSON ROAD Staff has met with property owners concerning a couple of curves (horizontal and vertical) and may fund portions of this road this year if agreements can be worked out. BIKEWAY PLAN , As projects are added to the six-year plan which are included in the bicycle plan, staff will request the Board to make recommendations whether to fund or not. Staff would like the Board to adopt a Bikeway for Roanoke County. 27 m 'Q~ u y T fll N b ., ~'aMG i a A fT .. fT O ti N a y a N E O ~.1 .~.. V O fT N K °a ~ .°.~ z m E: ~ a a ~ ~ 0 o y~ y a 1 ; 1 1 1 1 l ~ 1 1 1 ~ 1 l 1 1 1 ~ ~ 1 1 ~_ 1 1 O ~ _ _~ 1 , M - +~ 0 0 0 0 O O 00 O + } o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 + 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o °0 0 0 U ~ o o In a o o e o In In m c e o .-1 .r ~ ~ °o c 1°n 1°n i p .7 .~+ .+ ~°, ~°, .~ ,.1 0 0 1 1 1 i i 1 m 1 1 1 ' ~ i 1 i 1 ~ 1 1 ' F+ ~j ~ ~ i 1 0 0 o e o 0 0 0 0 o e o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 1 1 i 1 l 1 i i i ' 1 1 1 1 ' _ ' ' ~ 1 rt }}_-____ rt _..___ }.-_-. r _.__ ~ o e o 0 ~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o e o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o e 0 0 0 0 F o ~ ~ o u0i o N N . I 1 0 1 I ~ I I ~ N ' ~ ~ I 1 1 ~ I 1 I 1 1 ~ 1 I 1 ' I ~ 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O H t'1 O O O O N N O O o ~ o r r v+ '^ N H N rl t` ~ ~ N _ . 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 ' 1 * ± ± 0 0 0 0 ± 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O ~ p O O N O O ~ o o N o 0 0 0 ~••~ N N 1011 left N N y O M „ d 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 ' 1 1 1 1 ~ ~ 1 1 1 ' ' ~~~ ' 0 0 O~ f>\ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 00 O O O Oe 00 O O O O N .-1 C G p p O O 0 0 .~ 0 0 FFF... ° N o o ~~ o0 0o m m 7 0 0 0 'n v+ In 1n C O r.~ ~y N N O W N 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I ' ' 1 1 ~ 1 1 I ' ' ~_~~ D o ti .r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 o e o 0 m m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o sn In o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e N N to N 0 b b 0 0 t'. r f!\ [~ F fn N N f1 I1 H 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I ~ ' ~ 1 1 1 1 I I l ' ~~~~~~ }+-----~ rt---- ~ O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0~~ O O O O O O 0 0 O O O f„~ ~1 O O ~~ CQG O O 0 0 0 0 O O O~ y O M {G O O O O O O ~ ~"1 "" N r ~~ M p m o~ N ~ n N F Z ~ N N .=1 .~1 ~ 1 i 1 q 4pu Da N .-1 N N 1 l 1 ~ 1 ' ' .~ a 1 1 ~ 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 _ _ _ + - _ _ - _ - +. 0 0 0 o e o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y 0 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O O O O O m m O O O p U' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 izi 0 0 0 0 0 In ~ .0.1 .Od v N m ~ o o r H o r n .w In ~ o .1~ .-I .ti N n rn v1 .~ o .+ ... N w ti N 1 1 1 ~ 1 ~ 1 1 1 ' 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o .~ ~ o N o o P q ' ,~ c vi a s N o a o ~~~~ a o 0 a o°li 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ .r a en i~ e o 0 0 0 ~ le1 ~ o ~ l fF/I rl N ~D 01 r1 rl .Y rr~l rl rl b l0 rl N w1 .-1 .-1 llf O ~ N N m N y,1 [0.1 . r' m F a N o .d .-1 r b ~ b o a r' X 0 0 0 0 y O N N O O O 0 0 N e m i 1 ' ' riao~9~ ~ rizzFr~~ oesz~qq 6 mszF~] 6 ; m:zFgg ; mx 9f~ aizzF ~ r ' ~ 1 1 I a a u F a'3 m' n. a °u ~ m m m a u F m m n: a °u F o'3 m n. a u w o3 ~m a a~ ~F a''~ 8 e: a~ e°. m gym' l I ~ 1 I ~ ~~~~~~ ~_~~~ rmi m '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CD b b ~ o ~ N ~ ppqG ,. r ~y o o a~ pp y F 1Z-i x u F e~ b Fp p 1'j a a X~ ~~ O N a 4 a y y~ ~-I y PG m a ~ejj U G C Tl 0 Pl G~S n y f°t n ~ 'E". a F b fJ ~ ° m U ~ ~ >a m [pp.~, ~ y ~ ~ • ~i o n y "` ~C a ~~ Ci A N y_ 1Z-1 ~G.1 a N jE G pl p Q l-i N °a ~ F-~i o .i D a ~+ m {i V o Y~ e C p~LJ m~ I~Wi y~f.. Z A O o 6 .7 b m m b m~ y o A a ~ y o 1n U .y7'! F y ~ m O .tai F fi !! U m ~7 0 v: ~j 1.1 y M 1 [.J PG O ri py¢ py O O V y y O rti a .7 [pyrq r4 O O U_ m ~ i 1.y C7 yy , C G r eOa o '~G U ff: u oar opG Pa ~ 0 0~ .bi a ,He ,irFil [7 '~m v oC ~r57 N Gyp i ."-1 0 0C ~ ~ ~ p ~ p~ Caa F ~ ~ -_ +~ O R F .i m + m .m-1 R N DO ~ U---_ ' «U o W C 1zi .~.'1 >~ W P~C s U r C o W F a a m o W- a y ~ 1 _ _ OG ? _ m f V' l F ti--- O O m b N N b ."1 1"' 1 N P P 1 b f~ V1 O U N N O !• Iff ' O ~~ .-. b O b~ ~. 1 1 ~ ' b N b .~ m b P •~ O a .~. b N 1n .-. m b~ ~ O b n O N M rl r' N F. O O [~ Fr r1 E. O V 111 ,C ~ (..1 0 .-1 U o W o .i U o Er •~ U e ~" a [pp~.pp.11 m F mmr ~ n' "' p ! ,~ y ~ '4 r i~ U Ci ~ F v m U G~ F r O U O~p a~ U O F F O U C b U C oo °a V O L IQ-1 m a F 1~+ y ' 1 i ~ F 1r U y 1 a F w U Ri 1 a F ~+ y y ' a F ti U~ ~ a F l-1 U fA ~ a F ' N I I I I I H l u I ~ I h1 l u I I ~ U ~ I I I I ~ I I H I r I ~ I 1 I M I I I I I ~ I ~ I I I I ~ I ~ I I I I ~ ' - o n o n - _ 0 0 0 0 _ 0 0 o e - _ e o 0 0 _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o e n r o~ o ~a e {~1Wp! O m m X. i ~ ~ o 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o e o e O O o 0 0 o o e O O O 00 o o '? ~ ~ ~ IR '~ ri U1 O~ ~ p e•1 ; ~ 1!f ~ N n rl ! ! ~ b rl n ~ q C I W I r I V I I I I ~ I ~ I ~ I I I ~ _ o e o o N o 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 o e o 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 o e o o ~ 0 n 1 ' I I I I + ~ - I _ + - . - . _ ~ - + - - - - - I I - ~ - - - - - I ~ I - - - - - - - - - - - + - . I o 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 ! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M O Vf F ~ O O O O O O O O O O O O b , C'Oq J n O N N O I !! m O 1f1 N Yf N ! ! T 01 O O ~` ~ r ~ n I I I I I I ~ I ~ I I ~ ~ I I I - _ _ _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o b 0 o a n 0 o o e o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - ~- I I o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o n n y~ N f! G E y n T ga O O m a T H O .w O A 0 .-.! N OG % a IRC p O .~+ 4 M O j~ C y U e A N o `r I O o .i m o N O 6. N + F o o o° m ~ ~' O q a N 4 4 - I ~ tl O O M C H M M ~ OI WWW a + _ - - I rn b-~ °z I•i {p~Hj+ h W { -~- 1 H N O N V 00 t - - - H ~p yw ~I pKD ' W M i ~ q ~iCp I OG 'F ~p-.I - I ~' 0 o In In e o ! ~ ~~ n n a s N Y1 N '/ b b ~ I I I I I I I I I I ._-_.- + ------ + ------ y --._ + _--.-_ • ---_-- + .---_- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o e o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o vi vi e~ o e o o ~~ N vN°~ 0 o v+ In v+ n n N N r n .+ .+ n n 1 I 1 ~ I 1 1 I __ + -~---- - + 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o e o o -+ 0 0 0 0 o e o o 0 0 .+ .•+ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o el a 0 o vi ui o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o ri .i In In b b n ~ In In n n In In n o 0 !! N n N! n N I I I I _ _ I I o n o n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O N O 00 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O 00 N O N O 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 N N 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 O O O O n n !! I m m b Ilf 4l1 O O !! Y1 O Ifl ! b O N r1 N ~"I rl H I I ~ 1 1 1 I 1 ~ ' 0 0 0 0 ; 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,1 O O O O ± 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o e o 0 0 0 o e 0 0 0 0 1l1 O Ill O O O V1 N~ m0 O~ 0 0 0 n O n Y1 „ O 1l1 b Y1 N n n N N U1 N n n ! n I I I n ._ I I I I I N n I I I I N N 1 I n n t I I 1 I I 1 I I I 0 0 0 0 0 0 o e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o ~ o e o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 In o 0 0 0 0 o In In n n r r n n .i N rl N r1 H N N I I I I I I I I t I I 0 0 0 0 } 0 0 0 0 ~ o 0 0 0 ~ o 0 0 0 o e o o ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o e o 0 0 N . . . N n i . N . N . N . . . ! O O N N O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 1fl N~~ 0 0 O O ry 0 X 0 0 O O O X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ! b N IR N N N n! N N rl N N N ~-1 n! N If1 N n N N N ! N N n! O N N N n KI N N Vf rl N T ~"I a~ n! Vf O O N O H O N O N a H O O N on z m z z g as s 9 ea z m z F ~ eo s F ®~ oa s z g B I wa ~u ~~m ~ wcu~o'd® o.a~~e'dp ~ wa uo ~~m ~ wa~F~B ~ tia~~~m ~ cw asS~o'ap I I - - - - - - * - - - - ~ - + - - - - - - + - - - --C - + - - - - - - ~ p- - - - - - - - T - - .-. s o m a ~ ., ~ o~ IV-I .. g~ u ro~ ~ o H o e n o m a o a m a U n w .t m F~ !C G V .Ne N~ O nz-I W C ~+ p ~ V ~ e rn C~ 7E K V r a~ O r~ ~~ ~o s~ ~ r x a a m b '"' .. a m of a s ~ e .°.' I-I pia ~ z a ~ .; ~C" H a ! .+ ~.r a N pp~~ y~~i W a .-1 F a ((~~.I W a Yfi T b ! ~-! n I ~ N MI Yf U O N F RI fA N C N U OJ N F PG if. N N V It M ~ OOi N C F~ a i' r9 N F p T N F F P :i pppyyy>qpp i h+ ' o f oC 0 a' o ,'C O M e p{ H o_ K W o O .7 o IK C o oC .7 0 ~ o I ym m f ar e o [[-rI~ C (Z~ [yr [W+ FFN F O O ICp~i In D1C O F ZN I[-C~ FF~ >V o .~i Ue M ~C O F ~¢+ [CSI 'EyW+ ~i O Ou( vei IL I O O W ~ 'li I••I ~ FI Fn U' O EM+ N O I~7 ~ M CJ n TYYi N U' p O ~7 [~I~{ O SFG M U' O (G~~1i O O .i ~ M I N O O yy > o {~ p gyp {Uq q ~O pWq V yW ~ N y pZ pV rl N p0g1 p~~0 I ~ b C o 00 PVG i U e C (~~f (mL i ..7 u W [-I .7 C ~ O .b+ ~ P4 Vt tJ i t01 o R F .7 P'i I E n~ K U i ~ m~ F -IRRWII rl a ~+ a pG ~i N R R II! U O ei O M! + O + i 4 ~ 4 - ± - N n n N n n n N m n N m O! 01 O! A t a e b m b ei m b If1 m ~ Y1 m N m 0 N m 0 N a b n .+ .•. b n .+ .~ H .+ .~. .+ '/ r. n .I r. n n Ir ~ b A .-I .•. N Y1 N [[--I1 N Ifl N rl b Y1 [..~ N b N O n N [-1 O n Ilf O In pp N V N N ~ pp N N u n IUD n ~.I rl U ! E. rl U ! r~l I~ Ifl (.I _ 4 .~~" .. .. ~' F F" ~ M P4 C Pa p a p' ' W Y U q F O V g O F~ O U M O F v O U q F U q F v O U q C O V G F K F I-I ~ N I PG F 1r U tq I C F V N I K F w E m C F H rn I W' F Yw m R' F H E N r q N N N O m W m N e1 O --, ~~ 5 ~~ 0 0 N N o e o o 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 + 0 0 0 0 .y ~ 0 0 0 0 oe o0 0 0 0 0 pa$Q (pprjpp o O o 0 0 o O o a O "' b N N e N 1f1 ~ N N N N ~C F ' ~ N rl N N N N m ~ ~ .w .y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ - - i - - - - + 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e o 0 0 o e o o o e o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 1 I 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ 1 1 V! O O m T O O O 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 O O O O z O m m 0 0 0 O O 0 0 O O O 0 0 O r o b b 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O °m O [ti ~ ~ ~ n I!f „ O 1!1 N ~ ~ O O G O m o ~ i n i + + ----- M ~~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o ~ ui O O N U1 ~ 1!1 lR Y1 If1 1fl a Y1 Vf O N ON h N N N n n ~ O ,I M 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 ~ ~ I 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 o e o o 0 0 0 0 e o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o e 0 0° 0 0 0 0 oe o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ N o ~ o ~n v+ v+ ~n ~n v~ ~w o vi u+ O U N ~ ~ N N i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ N ~ O ~ ~ ~ O ~ 0. ~ N 1 ~ ~ ~ O e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 1 1 ~ 1 I ~ 1 I ~ p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~yC' O O 00 0 rl pp m .-1 0 0 .-I M F o ~8~ ~ e e~ 0 e F C N i i i i ~ ~ a i i i . ~ . ~ ~ N ~ i i ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 a O N O T a .. a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 oe o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 2 Z pm 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O f+ PG o o a o vi o~ v~ vi o vi N o 0 0 0 0 0 0~ o o e+ o vi ~ o pp M O Om 1fl N N T ~ ~ b N N N 1A N O N V1 O n ~"~ ~ M 'Z ~ N A N N N N M !! N N WpY 1 1 ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ A m 1 N N 1 1 i 1 ~ r~ m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 D O o 0 O z .-i ..i a ~ N N + - - - ~ - - - - - - i - - - - - - + - - - - - - + - - - - - - + - - - - - - i - - - - - - i - - - - - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 o v+ c o ~n n o o vi o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0~ o 00 0 o a u~ v~ 0 0 0 F ~ u~ o ~n o o N N v+ n o o ~ N b o o ~n .+ ~ .y o o Yf u+ o 0 o of o 0 0 .+ N e o n N N m r~1 N N N N N M N N N N N P1 N N r' N N N N N N M O • F U rl N rl V1 a b '~' b N O N O b O O O~ y N O O O 0 0 N N N rl O N 0 0 m ~ 1 ~ p eosz~~~ ~ 0°.s$o~8 ,;ao~~8 ~ acRZ°~~8 ~ "!~o~~~i ";~~F°~35 °°•\~S'~q ~ a m v F m m s a U F m o: m u F e'Z m o. m u F m d a u m m o~ m F a re F m o`b pt -- - - -- -- rN- ga Z ~ ~ a i e G o Gp r 5 n S y^^ ,~ . n s ° .y r .i • ~ m O w e mmyb ~ o M Iq o ~n .6 ~ ~y Fy. ~' m V c Zc Z ~ U m r C ~ R1 m F K ym~ U C H F+ M a W C o~ U .~i m E D O~~= r~ o AC o f% aUUUUDa UA 67 o W Z i ~ o p~ G n m .+ N C o 0 o S z F~ N F o a k°~ ik K ° F F C~ m o ~°, F m o VJ ilk 6! O ~~ o f 'i' ~ ~ ~ m~ ao~~e~ ~m~~ > ~ "~, C .r °UD ~ o Z y m~ ~ o y ~ ~ ~'^ C pJ U N F m N a o a z m ~r ~ ° u, ~ m m r m o ° .e o° vFi ~ ° {~. ~ °m ~ yp~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ vi om o pp O Q rNf,' o o Z tq H o N K ~+ ~ M O U m W o N .-~ ~C W o t+ W ~ b. e M 2 0>~ O o m p D~ ~ o~ n U S.t u~ o o z~ U i ZF F o UUD C~ i K .n N r~ i oa v~ .•OCC O v C O OE (U(pp ~ ~ e K a f-i ~ ~ ~ b m pm N ~ ~ F r C O W fpqq ~ n py:. yay(-... ppp y~ i ~0y4 ~ ~° p yO W C y--- + S o 0. F a 0.' + a1 0 0. K to m i m O W C wF m i~ O 0. F a m i~ O W v! O U i~ O~ F°+ rl 0.' i C o~ F a `-+ ~~~ --- q 1y --- T q N Al n O ° ~ ~ ~ N m O .-. A N N .-. 1 N en U1 _ n' N - n~ N ^ N b~ n e ~ m ~ ... b O ~-. ~ ~ i E. :y r b r n n w N b '^ ~ 0 0 m o n r ~+ b o N ~+ o ° v' n a o U o yE~ ~ m ~' m m .. E" p~ D ~ F F m oPPo ~ O V O O F v O U G O c°G ~ O U A~~~ °K F ~ j tFil v i C H r°i U F r ~ 0°G 4U+ ~~ vFi ~ ~ F -Qi VFi v G U ~ . C F ~-+ U m i m F ~+ U m ~ a F M m W v w r P N g~ O m a a .~ a 0 rl O ! O n a O ~ M ~ Q 0 0 U m N O a y C h U O a ~ w ~ ~ N 0 0 0 0 Oq ~ o N O a r N ~ F py~' n n n m O u ~ n 0 0 0 0 N e 0 0 n y o 0 0 0 O ! O P M O F o 0 ~n .r .r 0 r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ o n n O Y1 O n • ~ ~~~~~~ + O O O 0 0 n o 0 of o 0 N N .-1 N o N O W n • } # _ _ _ _ _ 0 0 0 0 N ~. o ~~rw o r a~ ~ ~ H ar ~ O y ap m yR x o 'm" ~ ~~ F F ' i 6 ~e n F ~ U O ~ U F Z 4. F F ~ i O O O O t ~~~~~ O O 00 00 O O y ~~~~ ~ i O O m m O O O O O O 0 0 ~~ w• _~~ 0 0 0 0 O 00 O O O O O O O 0 0 O O O O O O N .w ti .y N N In ~ , N ! ! n r n O O N N N N m n n __._.._ i • __.__ i i i • ._-__- y __._ ~ ~ • i __ a _.____ • _...__ y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i o 0 o e i o 0 0 o e o 0 0 ~ 1 I 1 ~ 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ I i e o 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O N 0 0 O N N .w r1 N r1 n n n ~ i . • . ~ ~ • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ui vi vi ~n o 0 0 n n .+ n n 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I ~ 1 D o n n 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 1 • 0 0 o e 0 0 I I 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 m T 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N O M n N N N ;~ ~ 1 I I 1 • 1 1 t 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 o e e o o m m o 0 0 0 o e o 0 0 0 0 0 r n .w ~ O• O N N O a n h i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O . ~ O r r t r O~ ~ i N N N ~ ~ N {L H N H d ~ a «--- m 'Qyjz. ~ ah W 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 o N o N r N r n n ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C~ 0 0 0 0 ! N F VI ~ N O N O O N~ N r r m n M p N U ~ ~ O O ; ~ - - - ~_~ • a a v ~ ~ ~m + w 0 ~: b o = . r O ~ ~ ~ O N F : ~ ° a a ~ a . b o a ~ ~ _ ~ m F O iq Fi oa ~ ' ~ ~ z~~ O i qq p ~ S o Pa mi C H t _.. , w . ~ __ 0 0 PO O :r n o b O O .+ O ~ O [[~y O U N .a a ~ pp W ~~ F H U N • ~ i ~ ~ i ~ ~ i 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 o a m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 oe o o m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 !! o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O N O O N b b N N N N O N O O O O O .y .y .-i .~ .+ ~n m m n r .+ N .~ ! o N .~ .w .~ .y n n ti .y n .~ _ _ ~ _ _ ~ _ _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .ti o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o e o 0 0 o N N 0 0 ~ vi o .Nr .y r H N ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 Oe O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 00 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o e 0 0 0 0 ~ q T N O~ a n T rn ! N O~ q N~ O N P O N O r a N~ N N O O O N N~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 01 ~ N N nt N H! O N O~ A I•f ~~ O rl O O N! O N O O N r1 N N rf n N M n N N N n n In n n n O O O rl O ~ ~ ~"~ ~ •"~ ~ m i SG PP i M¢ ,Z F 04 i i p0 i x ~ M i 0+ PG O F M M a U P9 W a U F m 6 a F a P9 ~ a s F m~ a a F Pa .n U' FZ+ O W .ti 4 • pyp ~. pW .y b r u 'l. C•l vl 'Z i GI O O ! e C M O ^ ~ P9 °" m w C ~ A ~ CP z ~ z e s o m ~ `' !C ~ P° ~ '' S"c m Ac a s ~ aO H U' o w M w a a en W m g N c M O O a~ ~ o W n F o N U~ R 0 0 0~ K O Z a a a p P ~'i ot'c u v: p a~ o U ~n r~ w r .+ ~ a G o Y a O o o a o ~ e m ~ m b n o F m ~ a a o Po F vi m (.~ F F a m ~ (.~ (r O O % O H a a 0 N m 0 t!1 W 0 Z~ m ~~~ ?. a (~ ~+ m H M b a F Ri m lq o m ~ H ~n ~ ~ ~ ! a m O ~ u v ~ ~.t x [CM77 b ~ o ~ ~ R ~o a O D~p ~ m a ~ ~ ~ ~ f+ m a O MI /UA ~ ~ r ~ N as ~ 0 0 0• P4 ~+ a *~ o o. E i~ ~ n 0 a F a a Mc o h• F a a « K o W F a a ~ a o____ ~ __.___ , ~ __. _ -_.-_- r ______ ______ __ b o! ! o o. N~ N! .~ N! r1 w o n O r O b b b N N b N N !! N ! - b o -. b r - r ~- e r .- i t .~ r O m F O O I-~ O f V O O n tr O n m ~ ~ PP ~ ~ K PO ~ PP n a ~ M [pr p, {p. [pr R [p~ R [p.. a E O U Ci O C V O U G O N O U O 4 F O U p 4 F V o U p H v ~ U O R F a F fw P4 ~ a F f+ U a ~ a F H h N ~ a F M N to i a F H CCUJJ V7 ~ a F ~+ N N ~ F q ~* p~ C N r :~ K a a 0 0 .°~ q° I I O bb o I I I ~ F U Y _ + _ + _.____. a __ I I I I ~ I I ' I a + ___._. + ______ + ..____ I .-__.. a .__. + _..__. I ~ + e o 0 o 0 0 I ~ ~ 0 0 I I i ~ I O ~' ~ I I I ~ ~ ~ F p ~ I I SO ~ I A ~ I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I U I I I I I 0 0 0 0 0 I I I I ' ~ I + ___--- + _-.._. + + ___.__ a ____._ + ...___ ~ ~ I I v I t o ~ I t o I ~ I I N I I I I I i 1 ~ I I I I r w _ +.__.__ +._ q 0 0 0 I ~ I ~ I I r I I ' i ' i ' I I ' I I I i I I I I I I I + _~__-_ + ~_~__~ + ..._ +.__.._ a __.___ + __._._ I I 0 O O ,F o vi In U o I I I ~ I Oa n 1 ~7 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I ' ' ' ' + __..__ + .__._- + _..._- I ~ ~ __ + ___~_- + _~_--_ I I _ ___--~ + ~_ + + + 0 0 0 0 a o o 0 ~_ .n o In vi N 0 a. o N I ~ I I I 1 ~ I 1 ~ ~ I I ~ ~ ~ + 4 i I ~ ' ' I I 1 ~ ~~ + ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~ + ~~~~ + _.____ + _.___. i ~ ~ I O O O O O O O O a ~, N o V ~-I q O ! M n I I ~ ~ O O~ O I ~ I ~ I ~ I ' I ~ N 1 I ~ I [~ ~..~ I 1 1 ~ ' I I I ~~~~~ 4 p 0 0 0 0 ~ Z M F c I I I '"I I , I I I I I S ~ m o I I I I ° I ; I I I I ~ C I n / I C( I I ~ F I I ~ I i ... I p ~ I I q I r I I ~ I I 1 I I I I ~~__ _~_~- . ~ I O i + + V 0 0 0 0 A p~ O H I I I I I I I + - + - . I - - - - - - + - - 0 0 0 I I _ ~. I - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - - + - - - - - * - - - - - - * - - - - - - + I 0 0 V' q 0 0 0 0 1 I O I O M p' Y1 N O ~y I!1 b 1 ~ I 1 ~ ' ~ ly ~ I 1 ~e ` N I 1 I 1 I I 1 I I j I d I g W M I I I I I ~ I , I I ' I~ a l I I I I - - + - - - - - - - + - - - - - I * - - - * - - - - - - + - - 0 0 0 0 - - - I I 1 N M ~ ~ Q I I 1 ~WPi I I I 1 W I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I ~ I I I I I ~ ~ ~ I I I O O O O ~~~~~ O O O O q 0 0 0 0 OC N j-I N O ~ O O [r ~n ~ o q N F V "~ "'I q N N i I ~ W i I ' ~ ~ I I ~ i p~ 0 0 g Q I I I i ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ' ~ I ~ p C V F W M I __ + ~_ I ___~_~ + _-~_ + I ~ -- --~- __-_ a ____-_ + ._.-.. ~ I ~~~ + ~~~ F b O p p' H W M M O {O ~ p y (~ O t~ N HI $ 2y w u' y MM ~ N ~ U r7 O o m pn N M i ~ F I y pq ~ e F ~+ R Y7 r ~ I a I ~ I I ' I I ~ p q I l I I ~ ~ o L .] ~ 7 ~ I ~ I I U a •• ~' p I .7 p . I O [~ PG P7 ~ ____- ~ i I I I E I .. C I y iK ~ a o W __~___ + _ ~ ~_____ + ____~- + r O N I I ~ N ~ .~+ r ^, oG o i ~ ~ .~ Apr CG ~ Op, _. q I , O F M~ y w I I I I I I N C1 N N m w T .v a\ a °Oa~ K~ T H ~ • _ i _ i . O h o ~ r p/ Fp h o m n m+ ~ .r vi O Jp .~ ! F pyy,~' b ! t~ ! RI O o v~ CC11 .+ i - • - i i + O O O O b b N O O O ! m O T T O N M M f ~ ~ w ' m i o o m b r 'ji O O m ~ G ! O O b H O ~ M o vi o o .a r a ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ N N N ~ 4 i ~ t O O b Ifl O O O N M N O O 1!1 m n O ~ 1!!1 N T ~ O 1n m ~ O T N O O O N N N ! e4 ~ • • • - O O ew t~ ! 1~ O O F b T N O O en m e o i i v m ~ ~ f v v N v .+ m N N r o ! M O O d N N O 8 ~ N PL y W iK W • - i - i -~~-- ; m o o m in r .c F O O ~ ! b 'y ~I O rti 7 ~-1 r4 O O - O m M O M O f7 j~ N O p p b ~l N O N b 1~ C q O m K1 N h ~ o a N N r .., a w O o ~ i i U --_ O M - ~F - i - - + O M N ! 0 o N n h q O O r1 ! O O N N O N O N O b b O .y N N ~ N } i J + A O O r7 O~ O O T O M fX O~ ! Y1 O H H m m N r ~ a ... N F . i N a N ~. 0 w O O O 5 U' ! O O ! O z , N ~j m b ~ m Al p, v. W W N N N y i ~~~ t ~~~~~ O O O D O 0 0 0 M O O O F w r n ~° ~ ~ a F V ! . w O ~n W ~ N ~~ } - - imzzzc~ a ~ o o z a u w z «' o ~ `~ ` ~ F ~ " a O b pt+~ ~ F F ~ m ~ ~ O O i G DO ~ F 4 u a ° m a u 00 ~ C M Q REVENUE SHARING 2. a. INTRODUCTION: The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) annually provides counties the opportunity to receive State matching funds for the construction, maintenance, and improvements to primary and secondary roads in the State's highway system. The Commonwealth of Virginia recently increased the pot from ten million dollars to 15 million dollars for the matching program but still limits participating localities to $500,000 each. However, if more or less than 20 counties participate, our share of money will be reduced/increased proportionately. Last year, Roanoke County's matched funds were reduced approximately $28,000 ($56,000 total). However, supplemental funding added back approximately $25,000 ($50,000 total) and we were able to fund all the projects: Roanoke County and the Virginia Department of Transportation staff have been continuously reviewing and evaluating streets and drainage requests throughout the year. In addition to reviewing citizen's inquiries, staff contacted Roanoke County's Economic Development Department, Utility Department and VDOT's area superintendents. VDOT and County staff have reviewed and evaluated each request received for inclusion in the revenue sharing plan. In deciding which projects would be included, the following criteria were used; traffic counts, pavement width (18' or greater for plant mix) existing and future development, overall pavement conditions (alligator cracking, depressions and utility cuts), drainage, vehicular safety, and the economic benefits. Following is a draft priority or projects to be completed in the summer of 2000. Several of the proposed projects require work outside the right-of-way and staff is still in the process of acquiring the necessary temporary agreements. If we are unable to acquire permission from the homeowner, the projects will be replaced from the additional list enclosed. 34 ROANOKE COUNTY ~M ~~ ` a~'Y DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR d FY 99-00 REVENUE SHARING ~~ ~, ~~ oL L ~J ~L o { ~ 2 '~ x,~ ~'` -, -~ n o ~ P o~ N ~ U R ~ IS ~~ ~~ U ~~y ~ ~JN c~ ~,~~a ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ,~~ o ?` ~ jj Wayburn O ~~ ~~ ~ lj ~J r ~ nq. ms`s Rt,1~~2 ~ ~~' ~ S~ ~ G r e e n ~iG`~1 ~. ~ ~~' d `~ ~ d or' G~ ~,~ R t' 1711 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1~ ~~ ~~ ~ X02 '~, Rrt. 1413 MONTCLAIR ESTATES ~a~ PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ROANOKE COUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 99-00 REVENUE SHARING b ~ J ~m ,~3 ~ ~a ~9 ~~` ~~ 780 ~ _ - _. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ .. ''S S~ 23 ~~,1 r v~ Q \/~ ~5 ~ ~~ ,~ ,~~' Cr ~ ~ O ~- ~- . ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ,~~ Q~ NORTH SPRING DRIVE i ROANOKE COUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 99-00 REVENUE SHARING ~~~ ~~ .a ~~ 4 ~.~ ~x,- pe 7' Fo^Prr a~~ Pen-~ Forest B~~d J Q-"' Rt. 687 ~rtlsy fir' ph ~ 5~~/ j^ Q• ~~. R'~• ,i-¢ ~~ 1r° L ~' ti ~s~r~` ~~31 Gr°Q~~ 8fl~ O ¢~,. fit. ~~ 5''~ cso ~~ 1 ~~ ~~ d Kenri~k 'SQ ~ Tr, ~ PpFf fin. V~ 0 ~ l^ Rt. 1532 ^~`i ~ St fin. ~ 4, r^ep f ~s Rol. w ~~9 ri Q- Rt ~ S., ~d ~, 4~ ~~~ ~p~Ooose fir. ,P AA h ° 3y st Rd. s~~ ~ ~q i ~. f dr` /sw ~' ~ Ra 4 ~i 4~ R T c~' ~, ~• ~~,. s~ cr°p Rt. PENN FOREST PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ROANOKE COUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 99-00 REVENUE SHARING PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS BELLVIEW GARDENS r n o~ ~~ d ~~ S~ • ''cQ ROANOKE COUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 99-00 REVENUE SHARING 9 ~ ~ Burlington ~lennenta~-y school ~s 'pq, a ~~ ~cA N,~ ~ ~ Z ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~~ ~ ~~ d ~~ Q N ,L o ~ -~ cs L 3 i~- R~623 N ~~ r0 Q ~ ~~ g3 o ~- ~ ~ ~ ~,?~ ~ Q~~~ ~~ ~~ 1x02 ~~, G~ ~mm 1V ,~ s-~ ~~ Midd~etO Q R~,1822 St E~w°~d 3 Rt.1a2 5~ R 1 o l ~~ 5 d~ ~~ 5 ro ~2 ~a ~r ~`u1^''h~~'c,2 'Pq~ c~ r~ m PLYMOUTH COLONY PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ROANOKE COUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 99-00 REVENUE SHARING ~~ i~ i~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ °' + a ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ S U L ~,Jo°~ Z'a1 g5 1~ q Nor~r~and R~~1787 Re Raa n ~e~ R ~' 8E ~~o- ~~ .~~ (linoton ~~`17gq. fir' _ W;ltow Ridge Rd RT,1783 ~ Robin Lynn Rd v Rt,1588 3 0 Rt 628 NQ ~e d 3 h R Ln O WILLOW CREEK PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ROANOKE COUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 99-00 REVENUE SHARING ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~A ~ ~ ~ o~ ~ ti .~ ~ ~ Qf ~ ~ ~ _ z ~ O~ Mus ~~ a ~ X-'~ e Dr R~,1 .\,(~ `~ 044 =~, ~r ,. ~O AbbeY ey F'~r~` Pedigo Ln ~' ~' ti ~r Rt,1064 9~; 4~wPl( Dr Rt,ld69 / ~ .~ ~ Q~ /~ ~ ~~~~ ~'~ ~x,~~~02 Peribrpa~ Dr Rt,1~63 ~ - - `" =- ~ o Cambridge Dr, Rt,1965 v ~~ Bea uP S ~ ago `' ~~ ~~ r 2 p~ par "R~ 106 ~ Q ~,` ti ,p ~o Pr, ~, ~ ~ 061 °b 'Px~o ~° r~~ ~~ h o• ~ ~ ~ ~~ s ~ i ~ ~' A -! >, Horn Cr, ~ ~ Rt,1071 i~. > ~ L ~ ~ E(iza bear Rt' 104b MONTGOMERY VILLAGE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ROANOKE COUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 99-00 REVENUE SHARING '~Qr,~ T~ ~~ ~ Highfields ,~ 9~ ,~ Q ~ Rt.1c01 ~ ~ cam, ~`Qr~ A Qr y ~~~~eR "1~~~ col R x'22, ~r ~Qh Pen~hP ~~,. `Y ~k C r ~~~ c yO~~.~,bPr, ,~, R~ 1 j~~ Cr 3 Rd ~- . ,n~~y~e~~'' `rte Rt. 1765 ~"' ~`d -s~ O,> .L r 3 HOLLY RIDGE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ROANOKE COUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 99-00 REVENUE SHARING ,~ .~ \ . ~\ ~ `. \. .~ ~ ~~ / `, ~~, Dr ~ ti- ~ ~Q~h q~ o~ -,. s~ ~~~ 4 'SQ ~~ ~~ ~J1 4.. O O Q WILDWO~D READ ~~ PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ROANOKE COUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 99-00 REVENUE SHARING 0 o Wilson - ~ Dickerson ~. Mountain - Rd~ ~,~ \ Rt, 79p Q '~ ~/ a l l e y ~/'~e w (Z~' ~1~ ~o-~ '12~ R d ~ . n Q '~~ oa~a~ ~~ o ~ ~ 6~ vo R~ '1 ~ ~ ~ ~ r~ ~ o ~ Q- 0 3 5 Rt~ X06 Quarry Dr, ~ dI R Br a X31 ~a~ R~, ~ ~ l PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS WILSON MOUNTAIN ROAD \~s L~~Q ti~ ti~ ~c.~• ~~ ~~ Q~ ~~ ~~° > ~a ~ ROANOKE COUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 99-00 REVENUE SHARING ;C~2~ ~~ti v_ 0 ~~ PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ~ ~~~~ ~~ ,6'Q ~~ \~~ o cq~ ~~~",,, ~~i 0 ~~ -~ ~~ . S~ ~~ n DWIGHT HILLS ROANOKE COUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 99-00 REVENUE SHARING ~_ ~` ~/ \ ~~ ~~ ~ e c tr~c o _ R C~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ R ~' ~ S21 ~~ ~ o ~t. , Qs ~y~ ~ Na M"'~na ~' ~ Rt,1S~~ ~ ~ rev ~ Rt, 72 o q ~_- ~ ~ .,1 Q \~~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ d ~ ~ ~e~ Colonla! P ~ '°P~ ~ \ z ~°"~ ~ ~ ~ ETON HALL PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ROANOKE COUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 99-00 REVENUE SHARING ~~ G~, Q~ ~a, ~i~ _ ~ ~y ~ ~ ~~ Q ~~ Av R`~, 136 ~ S 1 ~`'~~e ~ ~~Yp ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'e __ . - ~ Roxbury ~ ~ .~ s ~o ~ x~ Ury ~ U Q 5° Glen c.;' ~ ~~ gather Banbury ~-'~ ~ ~~ ~' ~ Cr ~ ~ ~ Rd i ~~ bl e r ~, d g e ~ off"--- -~ T h a r~ e Rt,1~ ~~ over Rd B PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ~,~13 _-- --_ ~ ~ -- ~~ . _- ~ ~ Rt ~13~6 WYNMERE DRIVE ROANOI~E COUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 99-00 REVENUE SHARING a ., ~pr~c ~ o R ~- 9g4 ~ s pr ~ Tr ~ ~~~ C ~, 993 ~ p( ~ I~r ~~~/~^~ ~~ GlQ ~, ~-~ P R ~' 99p tii~~ Cr ~~ti x~~ CARSON ROAD PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ROANOKE COUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 99-00 REVENUE SHARING ~~ay P o-~ e edge ~~~ 0 ~o h;~i ~~ ~~ .~ c~ Dove --~~ Dr, ~-~ CO c~ Riq~ ~p d ~~ .p ~j ~~ Rd, -~re~aW~r ~r`~- Cot~o~ y%~ ~ ~~~' 'P~ ~~~' R ~ 846( ~ h ~~ -s, ~~ o~ ~~ -~ o~ ~ ~~- ~Si-~ ~°~~ ,~ Chris pooh _ r_ COTTON HILL ROAD PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ROANOKE COUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR Fl' 99-00 REVENUE SHARING ~r~ ¢ ~Gl~`~ ~ ~ Mild Je ~~ _ < View , P ti~ V ~~, ~~ ~~ s~ P~ ~p2 ~~~ s ,~1 e ~. ~` .~~ ~ ~e o~ Cave S Rescue u~ad A v ~- o-~ ~ ~~ ~ L ~ ~~o `e~ R ~- ~ ~~~ ~~ ?` '~ ~~, ~ 1,1616 F ~G~ Q ,~k a~ 1 ~~ '~ ~,e v ~ o~cah ~ s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'Mo 4, m No q, ~~ ~ ~j o~ A~ 9 ~ \ ~~ ~~Z ~ ~ Q' ~ ~ ~ C~ ~~ J6o ~~ ~o-~ ~~ P~ PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS J q .~ ~ e~ P ~ ~ 2 ~ ocr~~ ti~ o ~ C>° ~~' ~ P~ °~ ~` ~ -~ MOUNT VERNON HEIGHTS ROANOKE COUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 99-00 REVENUE SHARING -fir ~ Q Mill ~~ ~ View P 1~2 ~ Ct~ ~ ~'~~ ~ ~ ~ s~;. PJ X02 ~ ~ o-~~ ~ ~- ~~ 9~ P~ -o ~~ ~3 ~~~e e °~ Cave S ring `° ~a ~ 0 Rescue uad A v ,~~- o- o ,~~ e ~(~ R t ,1616 Q 2 ~'c a~ ,~ ~9~ '~. c ~ ~ P ~, fj -~ ~ ~- i ~~ Cif-, ~ N Q \ ~~' O GY o N ~ ~ ~ ti~~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~, x ~ ~~~ ~ o ~ ~~ ~~o ~r o- .~ ~` ~eC ~~ ~r ~ ~- PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ~ P~ Q ~~ ~~~' ,~e~ 2~ ~ o~~ ti~ o ~ ~~~ P ~ MOUNT VERNON HEIGHTS ROANOKE COUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 99-04 REVENUE SHARING fir, ~ ~cl~~ ~ ~ < ~MView Pie ~~2 ~ Ct, ~ ~~ti ~ ~ ~ s~'" P'~ ~~2 c ~,~ s ~~~" X30 ~~~ \~,e ,v ~o Rescue r~uad ~ o-~ ~ ~ ~ A v ~ q ~~ ~o .~ R ~, ~ R ,1616 Q ~e~ ,jam i~ ~. c o ~ ~ P~ ~~ °~ 9~ ~~ ~ ~- ~ ~~o ~, A~ No V \ ~\. g poi oz ~ 9 ~~ ti~ ~ q~-~ ~, X01 ~ ~~ ~~ ~~~2 Zjf., ~ ti ~' p '` ~ ~o ~ P~ Q ~~ I60 ~~ J` ~ '~e~ 2~ ~ ~ OaJ ti~ 0 C x,Q'\ ~`~ 0 'p P~ ~ ~~\~ 1~1 ~~ C MOUNT VERNON PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS HEIGHTS ROANOKE COUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 99-00 REVENUE SHARING !~`~ ~ % ~- ~ ~- ,~ ~ / ( ~ 0 ~\`' l ,. , ~ ~~~ ~ / %r l ~ l ~~, m m ~ m ~o ~ ~ ~a ~ ~ z Q v R ~ ~ ~ A ~ (i x% ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ '} ~' r .c a Pane a ~ Rd ~ ~CKasaw D Lr a ~, Q °i 4 Dr ~ R~'~ga L 2 A,y sq~ a o m c Q~~ o ~ +, S^Nth o a L Rd cn ~ r H M ~¢ * a n Go d , ti ~ ~: f 4 ~Qr~'~`r5 ,~ Rt 9I2 a ~ ~'a, 8~° ` 1R~MIS~E~IMG PINES ~. a ' Ra °s Pd1RiX . ett ~ ~ ° ~o ' a ` ~ ,~ ~+ ~. Q, ~ 4' j Wtndf° d, Q. a m PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ABSALOM SMITH ROAD ROANOKE COUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 99-00 REVENUE SHARING o'"~~ R °~nrta Low r ~2 p Dr ~~' kpF ~ ~d. { ~~0 FPr. Greew ~9~ Go'~ ~ ~~1 ~~,. ~ ~r• ~ 6\\EJ #~a eta G g ~g Rx.. ~a• or b2* Q~ ~~. 2 ~~ C~ y ~° BLACKSBURG ROAD PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ROANOKE COUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 99-00 REVENUE SHARING . , PQQ`e 'c ti3~~ ~a .~ R~,1335~ R ra ~ s ~ o ~ ~ x~' ~X Rt 686 ~ ~ yQC. ~ ~°a Grandin Road Ex ~~;~ ~ z ~t r~ y ~ ~ ~ ~ ., ~ ~ Briq~le ~ o ~ ~ d. L n ~ ~ ~, ~ t ~ o ~ .~; +-' Elbert Dr Rt, 1329 ~~°j ~ ~ ~ ~ .~~ ~~ ~~, Whfpp(etree ~~'oo ~¢t 5~`\e ~r ~ R d ~,~'~(a -~ ur rR,~ ,.326 Sorr ~ ~~ . r ~ \ .Dr q ! o 7 ra (hq~ R t, 13 ~~' ~o ~~ ~~ ~ a ~ get Dr ~X \° .~o~ ,P~ ,rte ~~ ~r , R ~.1 ~~8 I ~ p elh `~~ `fl P Dr ~~, Cah~,le R~'1348 ~n &~ ~o Dr ~ i a o R ~t,13S8 ~ a C!'t~Icr. N CASTLE ROCK, PROPOSED IMPROVEMEN?S SUGAR LOAF ROANOKE COUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 99-00 REVENUE SHARING ' Pde~ ~, ~`Z ~ \ ~,1> n ~~d~~chool ~~` ~ c~ Ra, ,~ .i ~e 5 M~~` ~ C ,~e~ r~ ~ env ~`y o High 5c~iool PR~,1~2~ ~ ~ o ~ ~=~ Ele~nnenta y Schoo ~~~2 M~ bus ~d Dr d ~ o S ~ ~-~ ~5 ~ ro .Q~ e~ ~~ ~ d ~~~ Q `~ ~Ort Lewjs Fire fit. ~ o Com~an 9 ~- Ma~~ ~, ~~ ~ ~'Ort LeWIS SClle u3~ ~ c ~,escue 9 ~ ' o ~ 3. s ~ ~ c r 5 ~p 1 rt ~~, , ~ / J PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS DAUGHERTY ROAD, TOBEY ROAD ROANOKE COUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 99-00 REVENUE SHARING ~d e r w a ~ oJC ~ ,~ 0 tf 4 0 rh ~ h ot~ w F~ qt , a doe R* .Y +: a Gp ~ Ig o Q, .'r PS 3c' Ba~,^ ~o ti ~. "' ~ n 2~ z Rq e' qA~h P c w a ~p .~~ Q; v "'~ 0 R~ c,"' Q' r ,~'~ ~o- X880 _`.' ~~,. ~¢ P ~~ 0 ~( .~~~ Sian C ~ , Rrt, A. 183 Ra a„ 4Sa ~~ ~0ti~ n ~~. ~~~~ ~~ ~~ J'y ~'~~ lB~~ 'h r ,a. J`. P ~~ ~a. ~~ ,¢~ e'~ ~~ P { '~¢ Y ~e ~~ `~ ~~. STARMOUNT, N a¢` DWIGHT HILLS, Q PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT ALPINE HILLS 2. c. ROADS CONSIDERED BUT NOT ON THIS YEAR'S LIST: The Catawba Civic group requested work to be done to BLACKSBURG ROAD and staff evaluated for plant mix and drainage. Staff is adding a section of Blacksburg road and we will evaluate the remaining road again next year. Economic development requested a traffic signal to be installed at the entrance to VALLEY TECH PARK in 1998; but, the traffic counts still do not warrant a signal. In 1998, staff received a complaint concerning a sight distance problem turning onto WALTON LANE from Keagy Road. Staff contacted the property owners again this year but the property owner still will not allow this work. Staff will not review again, until the property is sold. and has received one authorization. Again, staff reviewed HARBORWOOD ROAD but funds were insufficient. VDOT recently surface treated the roads in DUXBURY COURT, staff will reevaluate in a couple of years. Staff contacted residents along WILDWOOD ROAD. BACK CREEK ROAD, STARLIGHT ROAD TWELVE O'CLOCK KNOB AND FOREST ACRE TRAILS for additional ROW or easements for various improvements but did not receive permission to make this years plan. Staff will continue to try and acquire the property owner's permission. Staff evaluated the streets in MONTGOMERY VILLAGE for plant mix but funds were insufficient. The developer is starting a new section and staff will wait until most of the heavy construction is completed. Staff did include funds to correct a drainage problem on Elizabeth Drive. Staff evaluated WOODLANDS for plant mix but some drainage work needs to be completed prior to resurfacing. Staff will evaluate again next year. Staff is working with the residents on BROYLES LANE to have the road widened and taken into the State's Secondary System. If the residents agree to pay half the cost, staff will try and work into this year's list. The utility department is in the process of replacing the majority of water lines in the _ CASTLE ROCK AREA. As soon as the water lines are replaced, staff will be evaluating these streets for asphalt. Staff is also trying to correct several horizontal and vertica curves plus improving the drainage on several streets. Staff received a request to install a turn around at the end of KINGSMEN DRIVE. Staff will evaluate again next year. This concludes our presentation on the revenue sharing program. Again, if you have any questions or require additional information prior to the Board Meeting, please do not hesitate to contact VDOT or our staff. 81 W ~ ~ O '-, ri .--i """i O Q U o z ~ 1 ~ ~ , , V, ^^ r ~ ~ oz`;' ] W L Q (Il o zo (~ n ~ C/] W ~ Q O C H O 0 W H Q E:.; U U W ^ Q C/~ ~ Q N t+1 O N t0 I~ m Of a C z~ z z z z z z z z z z `.L C F O F F F F F F F E' C f' O F C ~y O U O S O ° O ° C o O 0 O 0 o C 3 Q °> z °> > > ~ ~ ~ Z x ~ ~ x -~ } x ~ ~ x ~ h x ~ ~ x ~ ~ x ,^~ r x ~ y x ~ ~ x ~ ~ `.~ O F~ F„ F x ~ a Z at Z~ v S ~ r Z r Z h Z vai - - - - 3 a c, a a a a a a ~ a i - F ' a ~ ~z . ~ c Z r r r r r r r r r r a ~ w a ~ w w ~ z z z z z z z z ~ z z z '~ z F W Z p U a h h h h h ~ h y h ~~~ U h ~} ~: o V m ~ ee ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~,_ ~ ~_ M o~ ~ ry ~ ~ h ~ 00 c'~1 Q N {~ w C O h~ Y F U O O O V: - V W F O x V1 N G U V7 .~ y C • h C_ O gy !n V7 p= O VI Z O z !n G C C h '~ ~ V] M R' v~ µ1µ.'.t1 n_ (n Z ~ G ~ ' N P= n_ 0.' e~ F Z ~ f~l'1 n_ " C n W_ G W C Ci d' n Z W_ C' r CC c W W_ F C~ n W W- O C F W F = G ~ ~ F- G W W G ~y, ^ W F C i ~ W F• W z F Z F ( ~ • = C r W F W Z F Z F F^ G W cr Y 2. F F W F 2 F F W ~ Z F c' F W W Z F Z F Z F ¢ ~ p F ^ K ? 'r ' a' C C c O F ~ ~ U U cc a a C y. F a' v. O U a' = ~ U ' x C e: cG ~ O a G c~ c v C U k w F u. µ, ~.., ~.. a F u. F a ~ O 0 F C~~ e°n ~°, ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 3 c =o ^ F a o ~o °° _ C Z ~ o_ m 0 N 0 _ o c c _ o 0 c 0 0 ~ a O 0 0 z r ~ ~ a z~ ?' r r r r r r r r r r ~,~3~ > Z a a a a a a < ¢ a a z~ z z z z z z z z z z (> z :p ry M ^ b fV N O N ~D O V ^ 00 V b N M v1 ~ N N O N M N N ~1 ~_ ~O N '~~ . y T C V F cz t y H K H H H h H N H Z O °o N 'O o N $ ~ N oo N ~ v1 N N Z `~ a h 1 E"' nt N ~ 00 N1 N M1 h N P Z C y^ C ~ r. U Z O H H h H h H N !A N K a i! F Z ~ L ~ L U ~ V N L 1' ~ ~' L ~ a' ~ ~ U L ~ p ~' ~ p -' 9 C y ~ N C C ~ ~ N C L~ ~ o• U W W Q C ~ Z~ s p y Z y~ a ~ ~ -- ~ Z n ~ Q v a f a n s E ~ a n ~ •• ~ G^ O U m G W o a F oCO C ~,~1 o Z F oCO = ~.U o m F- e°o Z W o F oCO G W o a F m Z W o Z F m C W o X F m CW.i W c F F oCO L•7 o~ F ' oCO < W c ~; F ~ ~ ~ ~ C a ~ Q ~ ~ -J, C ~ ~ K rn O a' ~ -a, CC C ~', Z p. Z a p~ W CL ~ " wan d ~ W o'x a3 a ~ a a a O ~f a~ a ~ ~ a ~ 82 [z . O N C7 oz Q~~ z ~ ~" w O o z '' ~.~ ~ F~-1 Q zoo ,,/ ~ I-y Q w 0 e H O N W 555 w ~ II ~'~~ H r^ VJ ~ ~' z U _ Q ~'' ~' _~ ~ N cn a .n io ~ m m o O z~°} z z z z z z z z z z <~ `- Z X C~ O F O F F ° F F F F F ° F S F o F o z c o ~ c 8 ~ o o c > z 3 > > > > > > > > > > c p~ X_ W¢ X X_ X_ X X_ X _X X F a [a. W F- x F~ F~ I-~ x F a F" ~ ~~ Z a ^ z ^ ~ ¢ - .~ a - .~ m 3 a - U ~ a a o" . a a a c F m .Z CL y , F c Z r r r r r r r r r r ~~~: a x c w m } z z z z z z z z z z m 'z F W Z p U C Q w F a H F F y h y h h z O z c ~ c v i r i, r i, U ~ ~~ ~ ~ C ~' ~ ~' 0 0 3 C 3 0 o W o 0 0 ~'" O O W °' O O ~`" a O O ~'' U O ~ a Vi O~ Vl _ vii ~ ~ ~ V: r h N ' [/7 N V: N n H O Z ~ V r (n ~ ' V.` ~ Z ~ fn ° Z ° a y fn ° Z h a m C N (/ ' C O p' n W- O Lu F F C r vi v, - ~o ~ C~ a W W F W F C N C W F- F W C ~n W `^ ~- F W C~ 1 W W- F W F W C r W-~- F W W , C L:1 W~ W F W W~- u] ~~. ~, W- O F :z? F- F 4~r Z ~ o F o F , L' ? ~ Z ` Z ~ Z F _ Z EW- ~`? C Z C Z ~ ° Z ~ _ ~ F c F Z y. '" y' H ~ C ° ~ z ~ J . ~ a U ~ y ~ o F _ ~ o ~ K ~ ~ ^ F ~ ~ o ~ o ~ o ~ c ~ o a ~ u. :~. F w t. F a F• u. F. t:. F. F - _o F C% = ~ ~ 0 f~l 0 !'1 0 N1 .o M o M c H1 o M o H'S ~o Mf ° ~'1 3 c ., L z o o ~ e h ~ ° ° `" c W~~ ..~ C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 } ~ Z ~ z~ ~' r r r r r r r r r r ~,~3~ r ~"}z a a a a a a a a a ' Z` z z z z z z z z z z L (j 00 o r N e ~ N r O e N e ~` ~ "o m Q: Z~ O. - O N ~ r = H1 ? nt e N 0 U Z H F ~ ... a ! L N H H H H H H H H N Z p vOOi O~ O O ~r'1 fV W e a N r O ~ N ry ~ N O r M ~` N F .~ N h ~ N t e1 e Z C H^ r0 ~ .. U Z O H H H H H H H H H H Z ~ D $ Z M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ n F n ~ ~ ~ ~ U N ~ r W W y a r ~ ~ C x ;d ~ v in Y s v~ ~ . ~ a .~ L=~ } ~ W ~.+ ~ c N ~ C s Z- Y a C- "' C ~ "~ _ o F' eo C W d '~`., ~/ W o - oo ~.1 o '- 0o W o Z oo O [+) o ao T W o W oo W - 6 F oo W o u. oo (+~ o o a eo W ° C Z C a°', tazl C O0 Fz., C a uZ7 C o, W C ~ tCi] FC- po', W Fa' > p, Q G: o, ~ a' ~-y rC r cG d C rn Q a y. a c Y a c '~ > a o, rn 0 o, s ~ ~ F. ~ c C O z a c c 83 w O M Q oz ¢ ~" " Q ~ . ~ FI LZ ' r 1 1~ vj w G: ; ~ ~ ~ U Oz~ ~ ~ O ~ ~z o zo Q ~ b ~Ci H n ~ W H ~ rr^ v1 ~; U U W Q C/~ ~ -- [..~ Q N N N N N N N N N ~ m W F z~ ~ ~ z z z z z z z z z z ; ~ a Z X m ~;, O F F F S F F F F F ~ F °~> S 8 ~ S ~ ~ o ~ o x x x x x x x x x x z ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N G ~ ~ 1 C C G F~ F" F N F ac F" F a ' F" F ac F as F " 3= Z <~ Z ~n a~ Z a~ Z a~ Z v, a~ z h a~ z a~ - z~ a ~_ Z a~ v , Z a a c'~. a c a a a a a c F ~ ~ C ` ~ r r r r r r r r r r ~ ~ a ~ c ~: ~: } z z z z z z z z z z ~ z F W Z O U ~ •~~. ~' rF/I N H h y N h N h rF/7 ~ ~ CC U ~ ~} a a , V p ~ ~ C ~ ~ n .~ h Q~ ~ ~ C N M_ ~ ~ _ o ¢ h ~ h o o ~ - Z o_oP h N VJ w °„~¢ 3 LL ~ o ° ~/j M .Z o c h - ~ M~ o o~, VJ ~ V: Op oPv to ¢ o„o Vl V' 00 wcMza. U c0 _ p C 0.' ~ u; O ~ 1' vi Ii] c:: O 1' ~ R' o~ ua w .- O+ i ~ ~ ~ ~ [y~ u y. - CK b : w u~ C b yr n c,~ ua y~ N rv ~ y. v, 1' n u - u~ 1' n vi u '~ _ ~ F F '~ F C \ F fsl F ~? F F ,L•: F u.] Z - u: w 1 '- Ct D c F W Z C F u] F F fJ] Q p- tz1 F u.7 Z ~ V c ~.,. C 2~ z a u Z C F4' - C c , z C y z~ z a Z~ z C~ z C y Z C C ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ° ~ ~ ~ x O F ~ O ~+ ~ ~ ~ O w F a r w ~y F w - F w F C [~ Lti N N N O oo e0 ~ ~ O O 3 ~ =c C7 ` ~ N C M O O O N C M C N O M O ~ O _ N O O ~~ ~ ,,, Ci } ~ ~ Z x ~' r r r r r r r r r r 3 h F a z x r ~ a z a z a z a z a z a ' a z a z ¢ z a z z z a V M Y1 O N ~ P O h ~ W < ~ r N N ~ a O n Z ~ v m - ~o .o v, - r ~o M _ U F ~,, a f N H N ir1 h H H H H H O ~ f'1 h O N V1 P O ~ ~D ~ O h n N N h 00 O n } F C h ~ 00 ~ ~ ~ h ^ h ~ M ~ ...~ C ~"' U O N N N H H i9 N h fA N c c a' c 0 ~ ~L c m ~ -1 c a F z E L 3 M L N .a F' -' ~ fA L Z ^~ L c Z a L 0.~ c a ~ y Z N c D .o m c ~~ a '~ L17 ' Z m .~ N c (! M L G ~ ° ~., r C ao ~ {i~ C Lt7 ? ~ > L C? L .j ~` L~ ~' L C oo L~ L eo ~ C h V z L h _ L n C ~ Gt.1 n ^~ e°o P C ~ ~ e°o ~ Lp a Q ~ ro ¢ LL1 m fFtl ~ oCO O V W m w --' L•` L•V a°o s ¢L' ~ z C m X ~ O m ~ h a W~ c C m c}~ q ~ ~ O z ~ o. m o4 O ~ a c m C U O C ~ F _ ~ a ~ ~ ~ a } ~ a ~ c~ rn a~ _ P a '~ ` : m S~ 3 3 o 84 G: - W Q w Q ~' W O U o zW z~~ ~] Q o zo C'i H~ n h H n h W Q ~. ~' z U W Q % C ~ ~ .-. W Q ~ ~ M ~ ~' 9 C z~~~ z z z z z z z z z z a~ `~ Z X C E;. O C~ O U F O F O F oo F O F O F O F O !- F F C > C q > Q q O q > ~ > O > > C > O W X x k W V H X X W Q •] CJ Z ~"' ^ 2 h _ ~ h ~ y 4 J ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ Q Z j ^ ~ Z ¢ ^~ V z W Z r C '~ O ~ ~ Q W o0 ~ C 47 < v~ ~o ¢ vi ~o ¢ v~ ~o ¢QL ~ ~- G '^ ~o Q ~o N Q U a F G ~o m c -. C < q 7 S q F n~ a , ~ c z ~- r r r r r r r r r a W W < ~ ~ w ~~~ } z z z z z z z z z z , C `- > C z F fa7 Z .. Ci x z z U ~ N h O ~ z ~ ~ N M n Q > o ~ o c o 0 0 ~ o ~ c ~ z ~ 3 3 3° 3° z N 3 N 'l. a0 V] VI ~ ~ x ~ x Vl T N m ' C h M h C o h N N ' ~ V7 ~V h ' n Q e ~ aT ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ oo eo ~ h vNi L O O ~ n ^ F v~ f y r F c.: W K ^ ~ ct n f- ~~yy F iW O q n , O q W W 6 W FO- q ,c N ,c W W F ~ W Z 'r ~ j - W Z F Z F W Z F Z I- , - W Z F ~ F - F - Z ,j x r - W Z F ,~ o W° W F F o o ~' c F' ~ ~ - o f o F - o H c F t ~ ~ v ~ O z a O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ z ~ O ~ ~ FO- z ~ c F ~ t+ ~ F u ~ ia F ` i:. u. w H - . . _^ ~ c o 0 0 o c oo _o eo °~ C M f~1 N1 M N N v ' C F O o - -~ L C X~~ o0 o o 00 0 o 0o 0 c n o ~o ~ 0 n c 0 ° - o 0 c 0 o O z r ~ ~ ~ z~= r r r r r r r r r r ; 3 ~ ~ h ~=yz ' ' a ' z L z z z z z z z z z z CJ - ~O - ~D ~+ ~O O S N M r+1 h O O O O Op O O O Z. (/~ N N N O - O O O O ... C P U ? y. F ~ Q H H H H H H H H H H Z C r ~ N ~ .o N ~o N O o O b ~; N ~n - ~ O g O O O c O O o C }` ~ S Z C y^ ` , C ~ U F" Z O H H H H H H H H H H < a ~ ~j ~ O s ~ q o-' ~ C ~ v q ~ c_c f z L L Q~ °O L T V G ao s q m C= 0 ~~~ L~~ o q p. ~ F P ~> P C~ h L {s: vl ~ F n s .c z r ~ Z n ~ F o a~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ O ~o v~'i ~ 00 h q C~ C U ' °m v ~s] z m¢ W m~ W _ ~o T W m C W >' m~ W ~" a O =~ 3 r. c z W F c• u~.' W > -~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ C Z C o F~ p', .-] 6' c C F o+ W C c F- F C ~ Q F - N C c F W C' c F W C c ~ q d' o ~ ~ p C. o ~ r w ,r,. - O „ , _ y. - m m a a~ ~ z w a o ~ , 3 3 z v o m 0 _ = 85 ,. w O W Q oz Q VI V oz ~ ~r O ~ Q zoo ~ ~ \ ~ ~~ ( ^ HI G e N C ~O O C e G - r, r T1~-~ ~J W N H ; U F. U W Q E-, ~' ~_ ~ Q N f'1 Q to O N O Q p Q Q O Q Q C 0 ~~ ~ z z z z z z z z ~ z a ~ z .. C m F O O O O O O O O O U z° o 0 0 0 ~ c o 3 c > a ~ ~ ~ > O m U o a < W ta- m y T ~ ¢ W a w -~ ~ W a M ^ ' O s' ,,C O a C u: 00 < W X .~ N a' ~ 7 O s Z cv O F c ~= F K a O ~ O > a -~ ,o ~ ~` ~ ~A W >" >~ o~ 3m ° ~ o ¢ z n S _ a. F Z o Z >. r r r r r r r r ~ ~ m a a ~ v~ z z z z z z z z z z C ~ G Z Z O U C ¢ ~ h ~ ~ vFi ti ~ y F' ~ F N7 yea 0 u h ~} ~ _ O O N ~ ` `~ Z Z Z 3 3 ~- ~ O O ~- 3 C Z ~ 3 O z 3 ~' + _ $ ~ ~ r Z Z h ~ a ~ a ' Z- ~. ~ a ~ c ~ c ~ a M Mi o ~ ~ ~ N H y N y- `° a `° ~ ~ ~ w- O ` ~ ~ ~ „ r VI O~ O ~ .c z = o 0 ~ C~ Q o r - r O O a F - `c ~ ~ ~ o W o W F o F yy =' W F c E'" N W Q F - W N W = F o ~" ~„ F W WW z F ~L F r u] ~ W F z F F W~ W F z F F c F ° C C _ c o ~~ o ~ ~ C F D _^ ° ° x ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N 3 O v T ^ F n - c N .. .~ - ~' O L y ~ o c 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° o z ~ o ~o r ~ ~ ~ z a} r r r r r r r r r i ~ h s} z a a a a a a a ¢ a z z~ z z z z z z z z z a O O O O o ° °o o O °c C7 c $ o ~ o _ , z ~ ° ~ ° = - c ~;z~ ~. F z a y~ y y H H H f9 H H O S O O O b O O p O O O Q 00 O Q O ° ' ~ Y F - o o N _ Z C r ~ O p.. U y O N in H H H iri y K H _ < a Z F. F Z~ ~ ~ ~ N G ~ 1` C o W e o0 O o cG °° p P r1 o ~ ° Q ~ O `.1 00 p .. - `~ ~ C W ^ U O z N C ~ to N Q 0O ~ F ~ N n~ L W ~7 N 'n Z~ ^^ a m „`~', Z ~ , r z r- 0 0 „'^, S •e r~ ~o N „ , C M in ti~ h rn ~` n O F n O W Q u' ltd ~ O ~„ ~ O ;y oo z [3.7 p r h W Z o w l ~' F N rn W z C ~~ F O C O z C "_' ~~ o Z c: 0 4~ c Q~ o t ~ c a' '^ c o c. a ~ ¢ 3 L v O ~ < ~ ~ O U > 86 r ~ ~ w O W Q o z w Q ~ O ~ 7 ~ h"y O o zo ` C/~ ~" W Q w m m H ONC C. ONG C~ a x W Q H H ~; U U W / , " Q E ~ ~_ -J Q J ~ F C ~ m ~ r z z z z z z z z z z <,~ `" z Y m~ 0 F F F F F F F S F S F S F S oz$o > x 3 S > S > S > S > S > S > > > > > ~ ~ Z x ~ } x ~ } x w ~ } V a x ~ } x w ~ } J a x ~ } x ~ r x ~ r x 2 Y x i } rn r ~ ac r` " Z ~ ~ rn Z °t ~ i ti i ~ h ~ Z~ CL G 3 ~ Z a ~ i z v a e z ¢ ~ ~ z r, a ~ Z. . i ~ ~ ~ i Z v ¢ ~ i Z v a ~ Z. a Z a G a A a a 4 a a a c a F ~ Z ~ L O z r r } r r r r r ~' r a ~ r~ a ~ ~ ~ a o~ z z z z z z z z z z n ~ z z „ a a y y ~ ~ h ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ x 0 U ~ U G ~ N Q r+1 ~ N T ry n ~D n N C T x r ~ oo a N M ~ N ,,, °° n N ~. w p O c:. u. O O u. O V w a.. O O ~ u. O O a w C O r:.. w C O w ~ C O ~+- p O ~ ~- C C ~ ~L V; '~ ~ "'~ n: ~ ~ ,:,~ H ~ h N cL' ~ 6' ~n ~ Off ~a/j C a ~ V1 t~1 fn ~ [Y rn x rn h N h ~ C' ~ C e+,, N ~ !n 0.' - d' ~ VJ ~ VJ ~ rL ,ey y. .., - VJ ~ h n ~ - C n - N ~ ~ x '~.., _y '.-, ~ O U! G C n 1 x w=~_ O C (., _ m F~~~ {~ -y F t9 F u] w•oO F Cc: F O um- F w F ,,.~tt Z m m- F~ F u! u. wwN F p.. F oo z ' w m F Fes„ u7 ~ F Z ~ F w F z F Z rv F`~ F 2 F w ~' ,L•V Z Z k, Z C r a, `~ 2 F Z F a ~ Z F ~ z F F ~ z Z~ z F T z ~ ^ ~ , ~ d, E ~ .n y. c `~' F ~ a O c ~ t ~ 0 F c V u cti O u F c[ O u F C O ~ F x O u F C O ~- F 4- O ~ F z O w . . . . F G F C o x ~ ~ f~~1 N N N N N N ~ ~ . .r 3 w 0 =c ~ h _ M _ _ h N V`~ Z N N O N O f+1 O N O O N O ? O N O ~ ,_ r 0 r ~ > z z r r r r r r r r r r r ~ ~ 3 F z z o e~ a ' a a a a a a a a ' a z z z z z z z z z z ~ Z L Z y m ~ ~ 00 0 0o vi ro .n ~ C ,~ ~ ~ L, Z F- ~, a H H H H H H H H H H Z p b a ~ O ~n b r O. n H1 .- o N o N a b ~ ?~ F Q e ~ ro ~ e h ao Q ~ ~ ~ O U Z O H H H H H H H H H H a C ~ C a O C CC C 1~ C C C~ t = Z~ cry v L 0.' m ~ L (L1 N ~ + b Q '^ ~ G~ ~ ? + ~ r G N +, F r 'b ~ to t . ? a W ~ ~ 5 N ~ ~ "L^' m ~ o C .n w °~ F C ~' O p 9 (~ _ ~ a ~ O ^ ..1 = c O _ v, a' y .p LL m V ~„ oo ~ L37 w } oo O L en n O 0~ r C .Z L l + n O Z oo h F o Y Lt7 o tL F ~ ~ :y F u] m c F N Lc] lil C1 F . . l - c b F o °° O l= 0 °° y F ° Y t °° ° ~ G ~ `' ~ a U a 4 a' ~„ v~ d C~ ,.~ W~ v~ ~ C C~ ~ F 0~ c F ~ c U ~ °' < ~~ a m c V ~ a~ a p ~: rn a a m c 8~ , ~- w O W Q ~' z Qx~ W Ozu W W O ~;] z o0 ~~x ~~ w w Q N Q H N C N r < N r r W H H Q ~, U U W _ Q Q F } z z z z z z z Z C~ F U F O O F O O F g o z c g o o ~ o c o > ce 3 > > > > > > > ~ O Z x ~ ~ x ~ ~ x ~ ~ x ~ ~ x ~ ~ x 2 ~ x ~ N `'~ O F x az ~ F' at F" u ~-- a F r ~-' a cc z ~, z~ z~ z~ z z~ Cm 3° <~ a ¢ `D a a`O a <`D a <`D a <'O a a~O a r Ewa 0.c Z ~- } ~ r r r r d ~ ~ < x w ~ ~ c z > z .. z z z z z z ~ n z z ~' C a L- h F ~ y vFi h y C O C ~ v i .. O U ~' ~y _~_ O ~ ~ ~~ N ~ 5 N f~f h 1~ . ~. N a O O O G ~ C u~ C O O Om p OCSaO3 O < ~ O [n ~ VJ 0~0 1' r 0. m w w Vl z C~ W c:v O G fn N Z C n u; cc..,, ~ O G ~ N ~ M ~ t7 m C m v - u~ - V N Z C ~'+ it] _° O G VJ N fn N d' ~+ 0.' M c,~ °G u. oo - - N ~ Nt h a w ua - O ~ F G ` ~ F F u] ? F Z~ F F ? Fes- C¢c1 F- F Z F u~] !- :+~ F c:1 z x Z~ F F Z F ~ F F Z fu- Z~ F ua Z F "'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C G ~ rL D LL p ~ c G ~ ~ O t~ K ` O U `" = ~ ., F p ~ h N ~O U C ~ 00 N ? - l Q - e v N en Z~ o c o o c o 0 J C } ~ > z z z ~' r ~ ~ r ~- ~- r ~:~3 F 5 z ~>~ a z a z ¢ z a z a z a z a z C z a o. V O e0 < N Q t~ Q O N 00 Nf O~ !~ ~O 00 O e+~ Q M1 m Z ~ h N O~ N 00 Q Ir ~ _ (J ~ v r ~, a H N H N N N N z O ~ R Q t : o N °~ O~ ~ ~O o t•1 00 F z N O~ N oo Q m_ v G C U Z O W H N H H H H ¢ a ~ c c c¢ c c¢ c a F Z~ ~ ~D z ^' L M1 s h- ,p < F 1i ~ a L a M1 L F o .DZ O L Q m L - L F a .O z y F .o L Z F t`r~ C L~~ Z ro ° V ~ a' m W ° L O m ° ~ s z~ ¢ L_ m O L O% O ° C U p !A m o a ~... Ltl w o F Is7 o o o> F WW e o o S F ly m ~ L•V m v~ e o xZ Cr ~ Q, c: ~ Q o,3c p~ G o,Oc P z o,FC ~ O o, z ~ P o,~c . a O ;,ccz P Q ~ O O~ T O~ O. z p ~ O. p ~ T N ~` ti 88 4 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON OCTOBER 13, 1998 RESOLUTION 101398-4 CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Certification Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~• Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Executive Session AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, OCTOBER 13, 1998 ORDINANCE 101398-5 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 20-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED IN THE VICINITY OF BRAMBLETON AVENUE (ROUTE 221) AND ELECTRIC ROAD (ROUTE 419) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1, R-2, AND C-2 CONDITIONAL TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-1 AND C-2 UPON APPLICATION OF ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WHEREAS, by Resolution 071498-6 the Board of Supervisors initiated this amendment to the zoning classification and zoning maps for this real estate; and, WHEREAS, public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice require this amendment to the zoning ordinance and district maps to accomplish these goals, and more particularly the change in zoning classification of certain real estate to the zoning classification of C-2 General Commercial District; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on August 4, 1998, and held another meeting on August 17, 1998, heard from interested citizens, and recommended its approval of this rezoning; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on July 28, 1998, and the second reading and public hearing were held August 18, 1998; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law; and WHEREAS, this ordinance was denied on August 18, 1998; and WHEREAS, the denial of this ordinance was reconsidered and said ordinance was adopted by the Board of Supervisors on September 8, 1998; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors held another public hearing, after due legal notice and advertisement as required by law, on October 13, 1998, and adopted this ordinance. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 20 acres, as described by tax map numbers herein, and located in the vicinity of Brambleton Avenue (Route 221) and Electric Road (Route 419) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classifications of R-1, Low Density Residential District; R-2, Medium Density Residential District; and C-2, General Commercial District, Conditional, to the zoning classification of C-1, Office District, and C-2, General Commercial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. 3. (A) That the zoning classification of the real estate described by tax map number in Table 1 is changed to the zoning classification of C-1, Office District as follows: TeQ~ ~ 1 - C~-1 - nCCIrF r~l_STRIrT Part of 77.13-5-12 Part of 77.13-5-61 77.13-5-57 77.13-5-54 77.13-5-56 77.13-5-55 77.13-5-53 77.13-5-52 77.13-5-58 (B) That the zoning classification of the real estate described by tax map number in Table 2 is changed to the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District as follows: 2 TABLE 2 - C-2 -GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 77.13-5-31 77.13-5-30 77.13-5-35 Part of 77.13-5-37 77.13-5-39 77.13-5-38 Part of 77.13-5-40 77.13-5-43.1 77.13-5-47 77.13-5-48 77.13-5-49 77.13-5-60 77.13-5-51 77.13-5-50 77.13-5-43.2 77.13-5-58.1 77.13-5-62 77.13-5-59 Part of 77.13-5-61 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after (I) Home Depot becomes the fee simple owner of the real estate described in Paragraph 3 (B), Table 2 of this ordinance and (ii) Home Depot subsequently agrees in writing to the following conditions pertaining to the design and use of the site: (A) Westmoreland Drive shall be realigned and redesigned to provide for certain traffic control measures that will prevent commercial traffic from entering the residential neighborhood adjoining the real estate identified in Table 2. (B) The intersection of the realigned Westmoreland Drive and Brambleton Avenue shall be located to create afour-way intersection between Westmoreland Drive and the private drive serving Cave Spring Corner Shopping Center. (C) A 20-foot wide buffer strip shall be located on the Home Depot property along the common property lines with Tax Parcels 77.13-5- 3 53, 54, 55, and 56. A six-foot stockade fence shall be installed within this buffer. A private access drive serving the above-referenced parcels shall be allowed to be constructed within the buffer. (D) Final site plan for the Home Depot site shall designate a "truck waiting area" located in front of the building. All trucks shall remain within the "truck waiting area" between the hours of 10 p. m. and 6 a.m. (E) Sound from any speaker located on the exterior of the building or within the Garden Center shall not exceed 65 Dba at any residential property line. (F) No parking lot pole lighting shall exceed 22 feet above grade. (G) No off-premises advertising signs shall be allowed on the property. (H) The maximum height of any free standing sign installed on the property shall be measured from the base elevation ofeg Route 419. (I) All retaining walls constructed on the property shall be constructed of split-faced architectural block. (J) The property shall be developed in general conformance with the conceptual site plan entitled "The Home Depot South Roanoke, Virginia, VA-71 e" dated 3/20/98, revised through 8/14/98. (K) The developer shall prepare and the Virginia Department of Transportation shall accept a traffic impact study of the proposed use 4 prior to the approval of final site plans for the project. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. 5. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the Board of Supervisors that the provisions of this ordinance are not severable, and if any portion or provision of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional or invalid by a valid judgement or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, this ordinance shall be null and void in its entirety. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance with paragraph H amended by Supervisor McNamara, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Terry Harrington, County Planner John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Timothy W. Gubala, Director, Economic Development 5 ~- /' RI NORTH L /rl.la. v l si/1~..~.xa n maa-aax noon e Div x *w+ux e x ymn.m -~ nru ~+. ~`vv.~Op~`,.K*n u o. iw-n= ` H mr>-«~ '~aa1gOM~i, n ,aim ~~.' y 1 I ~~ a O° reed rays v R 11M h' v oau-..o 4j e. c.,eo~ar re'w~...~i' J' .,, ~/ rya ~, ~s ura ~~aa a ur r "~~ lv~na: o ~~ GTF ~su T6. 9 ~. urn ~ Q~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ .w.y~J~K`.:.. 1'~~4.i~l"w, ~:. ur„ ~ A { n ~~S'~~ q:i ' ~`'''~ 'f`"~" a~~F`,j.. 17"tv:. ~ corn ~r FC C- "t !3?i%4'~k i~i~,'!.''A't.i~ v. ~r...~~~ ~~, urn n~a O~ .~`~'~:,^~4~}V.~~~„w~~y(^iPl_'4h3'~fx+.':G' ~1i.~';u,. ~..... •~+~+:~ ~J ~.~~ ur u ~' 1 n~.u y / x ur n ~4/~v'/ L ~ !1 y,~~ V~ 't ~w,.,7'7e . ilq~p. v~ i~ ~' 84 OGjF yt~1ri a !r'x x.. w ti Fc "l' ,.' ~P~'' ~' ~fc ~a~o ,.., ; ~''ai 1 a Y ~' ~~~~ s~ VA, ROUE' 4?9 {Er~CTRlC ROAD) R o~NQa[SJ-r COUNTY ~ 4AN©I~E CO U1V ~'~ ~OA.~.~ 0~ SUP~'R VISORS D~'P~TM~'NT a.F PROPOS'~'~ R~`ZONI_NG F'RO~f C0~2MUNI~'Y DEY~`L t1I'hfE'N7' ~ _ ~ ~ P _ 2 AND C-,2 c 1'0 C-2 Y1GNI7Y -1.4P w cxa ACTION NO. Q ITEM NO. j AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 13, 1998 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 20- ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED IN THE VICINITY OF BRAMBLETON AVENUE (ROUTE 221) AND ELECTRIC ROAD (ROUTE 419) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1, R-2, AND C-2 CONDITIONAL TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-1 AND C-2 UPON APPLICATION OF ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~:w,~ t~'t SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: On July 14, 1998, the Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution 071498-6 which initiated the rezoning application for approximately 20 acres of real estate to C-2 for the proposed Home Depot facility. This application was referred to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this application on August 4, 1998. The Planning Commission held another meeting on August 17, 1998, on this application, heard from interested citizens, and recommended its approval of this rezoning. On August 18, 1998, the Board of Supervisors held a public hearing, and voted to deny this rezoning application. On September 8, 1998 the Board of Supervisors voted to reconsider this denial, and then voted to approve the rezoning application. At the meeting of the Board of Supervisors on September 22, 1998, the Board directed staff to give legal notice and advertisement of a public hearing on October 13, 1998, to hear from the citizens on this rezoning, and to vote again on this ordinance. Staff had advised the Board that there exists some legal authority suggesting that another public hearing may be required to reconsider a defeated rezoning application. 1 ~{- I Holding another legally advertised public hearing, and then voting on the rezoning ordinance, should remove any procedural questions with respect to the due process of these proceedings. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board hold the public hearing, and then vote again on this ordinance. Respectfully submitted, ~.(~~ ~; , E ~~ ` ,:~~~ t Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Harrison _ _ Johnson _ _ _ McNamara _ _ Minnix _ _ Nickens 2 -~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, OCTOBER 13, 1998 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 20- ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED IN THE VICINITY OF BRAMBLETON AVENUE (ROUTE 221) AND ELECTRIC ROAD (ROUTE 419) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1, R-2, AND C-2 CONDITIONAL TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-1 AND C-2 UPON APPLICATION OF ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WHEREAS, by Resolution 071498-6 the Board of Supervisors initiated this amendment to the zoning classification and zoning maps for this real estate; and, WHEREAS, public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice require this amendment to the zoning ordinance and district maps to accomplish these goals, and more particularly the change in zoning classification of certain real estate to the zoning classification of C-2 General Commercial District; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on August 4, 1998; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on July 28, 1998, and the second reading and public hearing were held August 18, 1998; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law; and WHEREAS, this ordinance was denied on August 18, 1998; and WHEREAS, the denial of this ordinance was reconsidered and said ordinance was adopted by the Board of Supervisors on September 8, 1998; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors held another public hearing, after due legal notice and advertisement as required by law, on October 13, 1998, and adopted this ordinance. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 20 acres, as described by tax map numbers herein, and located in the vicinity of Brambleton Avenue (Route 221) and Electric Road R- (Route 419) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classifications of R-1, Low Density Residential District; R-2, Medium Density Residential District; and C-2, General Commercial District, Conditional, to the zoning classification of C-l, Office District, and C-2, General Commercial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. 3. (A) That the zoning classification of the real estate described by tax map number in Table 1 is changed to the zoning classification of C-1, Office District as follows: TABLE 1 - C-1 -OFFICE DISTRICT' Part of 77.13-5-12 Part of 77.13-5-61 77.13-5-57 77.13-5-54 77.13-5-56 77.13-5-55 77.13-5-53 77.13-5-52 77.13-5-58 (B) That the zoning classification of the real estate described by tax map number in Table 2 is changed to the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District as follows: TABLE 2 - C-2 -GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 77.13-5-31 77.13-5-30 77.13-5-35 Part of 77.13-5-37 77.13-5-39 77.13-5-38 Part of 77.13-5-40 77.13-5-43.1 77.13-5-47 77.13-5-48 77.13-5-49 77.13-5-60 77.13-5-51 77.13-5-50 77.13-5-43.2 77.13-5-58.1 77.13-5-62 77.13-5-59 Part of 77.13-5-61 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after (I) Home Depot becomes the fee simple owner of the real estate described in Paragraph 3 (B), Table 2 of this ordinance and (ii) Home Depot subsequently agrees in writing to the following conditions pertaining to the design and use of the site: 2 ~_ i (A) Westmoreland Drive shall be realigned and redesigned to provide for certain traffic control measures that will prevent commercial traffic from entering the residential neighborhood adjoining the real estate identified in Table 2. (B) The intersection of the realigned Westmoreland Drive and Brambleton Avenue shall be located to create afour-way intersection between Westmoreland Drive and the private drive serving Cave Spring Corner Shopping Center. (C) A 20-foot wide buffer strip shall be located on the Home Depot property along the common property lines with Tax Parcels 77.13-5-53, 54, 55, and 56. A six-foot stockade fence shall be installed within this buffer. A private access drive serving the above-referenced parcels shall be allowed to be constructed within the buffer. (D) Final site plan for the Home Depot site shall designate a "truck waiting area" located in front of the building. All trucks shall remain within the "truck waiting area" between the hours of 10 p.m. and 6 a.m. (E) Sound from any speaker located on the exterior of the building or within the Garden Center shall not exceed 65 Dba at any residential property line. (F) No parking lot pole lighting shall exceed 22 feet above grade. (G) No off-premises advertising signs shall be allowed on the property. (H) The maximum height of any free standing sign installed on the property shall be measured from the base elevation of the abutting road grade nearest the sign. (I) All retaining walls constructed on the property shall be constructed of split-faced architectural block. (J) The property shall be developed in general conformance with the conceptual site plan entitled "The Home Depot South Roanoke, Virginia, VA-71e" dated 3/20/98, revised through 8/14/98. 3 i • ~ \ w (K) The developer shall prepare and the Virginia Department of Transportation shall acre\\\pt a traffic impact study of the proposed use prior to the approval of final site plans for the project. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby aze, repealed The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. 5. That it is hereby declazed to be the intention of the Board of Supervisors that the provisions of this ordinance are not severable, and if any portion or provision of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional or invalid by a valid judgement or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, this ordinance shall be null and void in its entirety. g:\attorney\pmm\hd2.rzn 4 ~,~ ."' PETITIONER: ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ~~: > CASE NUMBER: 27-8/98 ~-~° Planning Commission Hearing Date: August 17, 1998 ~ ~'" Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: August 18, 1998 A. REQUEST Petition of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to rezone approximately 20 acres from R-1, R-2 and C-2 conditional to C-2, General Commercial for the purpose of general retail and service uses, located in the vicinity of Brambleton Avenue (Route 221) and Electric Road (Route 419), Cave Spring Magisterial_District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS Michael Naughton, Hal Jones, Connie Sanders, Nettie Hale, Paul Bell, Doug Basham, Patricia Meador, Suzanne Seth, Ray Williams, Laurie Peery, Barbara Hansell expressed opposition to the request. Specific concerns cited included traffic impacts on Route 419, displacement of existing businesses, lack of buffering for residences, displacement of the "last black community" in Roanoke County and the manner in which the residential properties were secured, i.e., residents felt they had no choice but to sign over their property, flooding of Mudlick Creek, development will substantially reduce property values, safety of children, a small residential community will be exposed to Route 419 and Brambleton Avenue, lighting impacts, and noise impacts. Mr. Basham and Ms. Meador presented petitions with over 500 signatures of people in opposition. Ms. Peery read aloud a letter from Rev. Sanders of Hidden Lane, expressing his opposition to-the request. [Note: Copies are available in the Clerk's office.] Allan Ham and Mike Clearey expressed their support of the project commenting that more commercial development is needed. Ed Natt represented owners of the property and responded to concerns. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION After the close of public comments, the Commission held a work session to discuss various aspects of the proposal including impact on adjacent property owners including the Hidden Lane properties, the realignment of Westmoreland Drive, buffering of adjacent residential properties, stormwater management issues, noise associated with truck loading and external speakers, lighting, signage, the architectural design of proposed retaining walls, color of the building, and the need for a completed traffic impact study prior to taking action on the request. Jeff Echols from VDOT and Steve Barger from Roanoke County provided the Commission information on plans for traffic signalization, road realignments, and .possible stormwater designs. The Commission discussed and agreed that, if rezoned, the areas near Hidden Lane designated "optional rezoning area" should be rezoned to C-1, General Office District. D. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL The Commission stated that any approval of this request should be contingent upon the acquisition of the land by Home Depot Inc. and further agreed that the effective date of the ordinance should be 30 days after Home Depot lnc. becomes the fee simple owner of the property, and thereafter agrees in writing to the following conditions: . 2~~ 1) Westmoreland Drive shall be realigned and redesigned to provide for certain traffic w control measures that will prevent commercial traffic from entering the residential neighborhood adjoining the real estate identified in Table 2. 2) The intersection of the realigned Westmoreland Drive and Brambleton Avenue shall be located to create afour-way intersection between Westmoreland Drive and the private drive serving Cave Spring Corner Shopping Center. 3) A 20-foot wide buffer strip shall be located on the Home Depot property along the common property lines with Tax Parcels 77.13-5-53, 54, 55, and 56. A six-foot stockade fence shall be installed within this buffer. A private access drive serving the above-referenced parcels shall be allowed to be constructed within the buffer. 4) Final site plan for the Home Depot site shall designate a "truck waiting area" located in front of the building. All trucks shall remain within the "truck waiting area" between the hours of 10 p. m. and 6 a. m. 5) Sound from any speaker located on the exterior of the building or within the Garden Center shall not exceed 65 Dba at any residential property line. 6) No parking lot pole lighting shall exceed 22 feet above grade. 7) No off-premises advertising signs shall be allowed on the property. 8) The maximur-n height of any free standing sign installed on the property shall be measured from the base elevation of the abutting road grade nearest the sign. 9) All retaining walls constructed on the property shall be constructed of split-faced architectural block. 10) The property shall be developed in general conformance with the conceptual site plan entitled "The Home Depot South Roanoke, Virginia, VA-71 e" dated 3/20/98, revised through 8/14/98. 11) The developer shall prepare and the Virginia Department of Transportation shall accept a traffic impact study of the proposed use prior to the approval of final site plans for the project. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Witt moved to recommend denial of the petition with conditions. The motion failed with the following roll call vote: AYES: Thomason, Witt NAYS: Robinson, Ross, Hooker ABSENT: None •~ 3 Mr. Ross moved to recommend approval of the petition with conditions. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: ~~ AYES: Robinson, Ross, Hooker NAYS: Thomason, Witt ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE Mr. Witt commented that although the area was designated Core in the comprehensive plan he was very concerned with the scale of the proposed building, and the traffic impacts that will result at the 419/221 intersection as _a result of the approval of the request. He stated that the county needs to adopt additional policies and standards for "big box" retail uses, so that future requests can be adequately evaluated. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan - Staff Report _ Vicinity Map Terrance Ha Roanoke Co ..,. ,, .. ~.,.~.,, r Planning Commission .. ~~ Roanoke County Department of Community Development ~ ~ Memorandum T0: Board of Supervisors FROM: Terrance L. Harrington, AICP County Planner DATE: August 14, 1998 RE: Planning Commission Review of Brambleton Ave/Route 419 Rezoning Request; Preparation of Draft Ordinance As indicated in their transmittal report to you, the Commission will prepare a recommendation on this rezoning request at their meeting on Monday August 17th. On Tuesday morning, Paul Mahoney and I will incorporate the Commission's recommendation into a draft ordinance. We will distribute the ordinance to you prior to your 3:OOpm session on Tuesday. Please let me know if you have any questions. c: Paul Mahoney PETITIONER: ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ~~~ CASE NUMBER: 27-8198 ^~~ Planning Commission Hearing Date: August 4, 1998 ~, "" Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: August 18, 1998 A. REQUEST Petition of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to rezone approximately 20 acres from R-1, R-2 and C-2 conditional to C-2, General Commercial for the purpose of general retail and service uses, located in the vicinity of Brambleton Avenue (Route 221) and Electric Road (Route 419), Cave Spring Magisterial- District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS Doug Basham, Betty Mengel, Suzanne Seth, Christine Vaughan, Vernon Jolley, Lee Eddy, Robert Hearn, and Lori Peery expressed opposition to the request. Specific concerns cited included traffic on Route 419, impact on adjacent and surrounding residential communities, effect on vitality of other small businesses in the Brambleton/419 Corridor, safety of children on Westmoreland, lighting impacts, noise impacts, and crime impacts. Several residents stated that a cul-de-sac on Westmoreland was critical if access to Westmoreland was approved. One resident expressed concern for the integrity of the water system on View Avenue, expressing fear that it would be endangered by the development. One citizen also expressed concern over the secrecy of the request, and the speed with which it was progressing. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Commission agreed to defer discussing or acting on the request until after a work session. The Commission scheduled a work session for August 17 to discuss the request and make a recommendation to the Board. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS None were discussed at this meeting. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Witt moved that the public hearing for this item be closed and suggested that a work session for further discussion and action beheld on August 17, 1998 at 3:OOpm. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Robinson, Ross, Hooker, Witt NAYS: None ABSENT: Thomason F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity_ Map _ Staff ReportOther /~> Terrance H ingtq~' Secretary Roanoke ounty Manning Commission STAFF REPORT Case Number: 27-8/98 Applicant: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Prepared by: p_~ ~~~~. M; ~ ..._ Janet Scheid T. Harrington Date: August ~, I998 PP~RT I A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The request to rezone a 20+ acre site to C-2, General Commercial is consistent with the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map designation of Core. The specific use or uses of this site have not been disclosed as of the preparation date of this report. Therefore, detailed information is not available on specific neighborhood or community impacts, traffic, environmental concerns, grading, lighting or signage. This report has been prepared making the assumption that the future use of this site may be for a single large retail use. B. DESCRIPTION OF PETITION This is an unconditional request from the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to rezone approximately 20 acres from R-1 and R'-2 Residential and C-2 conditional to C-2, General Commercial. The property is located within the Cave Spring Magisterial District. This request has been initiated by the .Board of Supervisors to facilitate the siting of a commercial user or users on the property. At the time of preparation of this report, no public announcement has been made regarding the specific nature or identify of the future use(s). C. APPLICABLE REGIILATIONS 1. C-2 is a general commercial zoning district, allowing a full range retail and office type uses. Any of the uses permitted by right in the C-2 district would be allowed on this site. In addition, C-2 special uses could be permitted on the site in the future, if subsequently permitted and approved by the Board of Supervisors. 2. Due to the size and location of this site, the Virginia Department of Transportation will require a traffic 1 .~ ~~~ analysis of the impacts of the proposed use(s). VDOT will thereafter specify what road improvements, if any, are necessary prior to use of the site. Based on the current schedule for this rezoning request, this traffic analysis would be completed subsequent •to the Board of Supervisors taking action on this request. 3. All Roanoke County stormwater management regulations will apply. Current regulations generally require the on-site detention of stormwater. 4. Site plan approval will be required prior to issuance of any building permits. 5. Commercial entrance permits will be required from VDOT. 2 s! PART II A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS 1. Lot Area - The site is an assortment of some 27 individual lots totaling approximately 20 acres in size. 2, Location - The site is located on Rt.419 (Electric Road}. It includes the Springwood Park commercial center and the property directly behind this shopping center extending to Westmoreland Drive on the northwest corner. The site has approximately 1000 feet of frontage on Rt. 419 and approximately 110 feet of frontage on Westmoreland Drive. The site also includes Hidden Lane, a private road that has historically served as the access for many of the existing homes on this site. 3. ~o~oarabhy and Vegetation- Significant grade changes are present on the site. Current elevations vary by as much as thirty feet between the Route 419 and Westmoreland property boundaries. Development of this site fo.r any additional commercial uses will likely entail significant grading of the property. The undeveloped portions of the site are primarily wooded. 4. Buildings/Structures - There are approximately 10 houses houses on this property and 21 businesses. These businesses are located within the two commercial buildings comprising the Springwood Park Shopping Center .It is staff's understanding that the owners of all of the parcels ~~ designated as rezoning area on the attached map, have signed purchase contracts agreeing to the sale of their land. The attached site map also depicts those properties that are optional in this rezoning request. Although these properties are not apparently needed by the unidentified commercial user for the development of the site, their inclusion in the rezoning request eliminates irregularities in the zoning district boundaries in this area. Approval of these optional properties will also allow the future marketing of these sites for commercial development. 5. Access - Based upon available frontage along public roads, access to this site is from Rt. 419, and Westmoreland Drive. Although the adjoining properties on Brambleton Avenue are zoned C-2, there is no proposed direct access to (Route 221} Brambleton Avenue. It is the staff's understanding that no Brambleton Avenue lots have been included in this request because (1) these properties are already zoned C-2 commercial, and (2} the proposed developer ~'. .. ~~ of this site has not yet secured purchase options on any of these Brambleton Avenue properties. .,,,~ 5. Gurraunding Neighborhood- The surrounding neighborhood is a mixture of residential and commercial uses. Westmoreland Drive abuts the site to the North and East. Westmoreland i~ part of a residential community platted in the early 1930's. Many of the homes in this area were built during the 1940's with some home construction continuing into the 1970's. Westmoreland Drive connects to a series of similar, older, residential streets allowing access to Manassas Drive and eventually Colonial Avenue. _ Commercial development lies generally to the West and South. of this site along Brambleton Avenue and Route 419. Commercial uses include the Cave Spring Corners shopping center and the smaller commercial uses along the other side of Brambleton. Land directly across Route 419 is developed for a bank and office park uses. B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 1, t~s - If the rezoning is approved, and the proposed developer proceeds with the development, the future use of this site will be one of the permitted uses in the C-2 district. The positive and negative impacts of any particular proposed development on the community will be vastly di-fferent depending on the nature and characteristics of the proposed use. Due to the lack of specific, detailed information about the proposed use, staff has prepared this analysis using an assumed scenario that the ultimate use of this property will be for a large retail store of approximately 130,000 square feet in size. Using this assumpticn, allows the staff to identify possible site and operating characteristics for a particular use. Staff has done the following analysis of potential impacts based on this scenario: 2. Access to Site - The primary access to from Rt. 419, with major customer acce location. Secondary access to the site Westmoreland Drive. This access could alternative customer entrance/exit and point for delivery vehicles supplying this site will be ss assumed at this would be from serve as an a primary access the retail use. The construction of a large retail store at this site would, a based upon preliminary discussions with VDOT, require new traffic signalizations at major points of access to the property. It is assumed that new traffic signals would be required at the point of access on Route 419 and at Westmoreland Drive and Brambleton Ave. If a traffic signal is required east of the intersection of Rt. 221 and Rt. 419 it may necessitate the closing, and possible relocation, cf the existing crossover that provides access to the bank on the southeast corner of Rt.. 419. The proposed use of Westmoreland Drive, a residential street, is not highly desirable as a second access point to an intensive commercial use. Use of Westmoreland Drive could only be appropriate if certain traffic control measures, such as a cul-de sac, or similar device were incorporated into an improved Westmoreland Drive design. Such improvements would insure separation of the commercial traffic from this neighborhood, but would also prohibit neighborhood residents from future direct access to Brambleton Avenue. County engineering staff have prepared several road plans for the redesign of Westmoreland Drive. One or more of these plans calls for the construction of a cul-de-sac just east of the Westmoreland Drive access point so that commercial traffic would not have direct access to the neighborhood. This design would also alleviate the potential for cut-through traffic and could reduce many of the negative impacts this access point would have on the Westmoreland Drive neighborhood. A more appropriate second access for this proposed development would be directly from Brambleton Avenue. As of the preparation date of this report, direct assess to Brambleton is not proposed. 3. To_poq~aphy and Grading - Based upon the existing topography of the site, development of the site for a large retail use will require significant grading to create a flat building pad and parking areas. As was recently done on the adjacent °Rite Aid" site, grading will likely involve the significant removal of dirt from the site. Also, because of the existing elevations of properties along Westmoreland, and the lower elevation of Route 419, it is assumed that significant retaining walls along the rear of the property and along Route 419 will be necessary in order to achieve grades and building areas necessary for development. 4. Circulation andParkina - A retail building of the size assumed in this analysis would require an area of equal or greater size for parking spaces and circulation aisles. A 130,000 square foot retail building would require ~~ e ~~~ 5 approximately 570 parking spaces. This number may vary and ~~ ultimately depends upon the exact nature of the retail business . ,.. Due to the retail' nature of this use, it is assumed that the parking will be primarily in front of the building. 5, Tra~fiC Count - A retail use cf this type would be a large traffic generator, in the range of 5,000 new vehicles trips per day. This estimate is based upon a recently completed traffic study for another large commercial retail use in Roanoke County. Ultimate traffic volumes generated will depend upon many factors including size of the building, nature of product or products sold, single or multiple tenants, and the degree to which the retail_ user(s) generate new traffic or "capture" existing traffic already in the corridor. Current traffic count at the intersection of Rt. 419 and Rt. 221 is 55,000 vehicles per day. 6. Public_Services - Public water and sewer are available to this site. Final design of such systems to serve this development will be undertaken as part of site plan review. 7. Community Meeting - A community meeting was held on July 27, 1998 at the Brambleton Center. Approximately 100 citizens attended. Many expressed concern about the unknown commercial uses and impact on their adjoining neighborhood. Many residents of Westmoreland expressed concern about cut through traffic and some were interested in constructing a cul-de-sat on Westmoreland Drive just east of the access to the rezoning site. C. CONFORMANCE AITH COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The site is designated Core on Future Land Use Map. The draft currently being reviewed by the this area as suitable for "Core" uses in the C-2 zoning district designation. .he 1985 Roanoke County 1998 Future Land Use Plan Commission also designates development. The permitted are consistent with the Core The 419 Frontage Development Plan, adopted as part of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan in 1987, continues to show portions of this area designated as Core. In addition to the basic land use designations, the 419 plan makes several policy recommendations concerning development in the Rt. 419 corridor. These policies include minimizing signage, screening parking areas, siting small scale buildings, landscaping, analyzing traffic impacts, protecting step slopes, maintaining tree coverage and controlling stormwater runoff. 6 .~ Given the lack of specific knowledge about the proposed use ~~~""~~ or site design, staff can not undertake a detailed analysis of the conformity of this proposal with the specific Route 419 components of the Plan. PART I I I STAFF CONCLQSIONS The request before the Planning Commission is to rezone approximate 20 acres to C-2 to allow the commercial development of the site. Specifics regarding the nature, scale or design of the proposed commercial use(s) is not available to be considered as a factor in the Commissions' evaluation of this request. The analysis in this report has made the assumption of a single, large retail store. Such a development would conform to the basic comprehensive plan future land use plan designations which indicate that intensive commercial uses are appropriate in this part of the Route 419 Corridor. Determining compatibility with the design guidelines contained in the Route 419 Frontage Development Plan is difficult given the lack of specific knowledge about the proposal. If proffers or another type of design controls could be incorporated into this development proposal, such proffers could help to insure that the future development of the property could address some of the design issues contained in the Route 419 Frontage Development Plan. If the Planning Commission chooses to recommend approval of this rezoning request staff makes the following recommendations for the Commissions' consideration: 1. That the rezoning of this property to C-2, General Commercial is recommended for approval based on the site being used for one large retail stare. If any other use is proposed for this site, including any other C-2 uses, then the request will either (1) be withdrawn by the Board of Supervisors, or (2) be referred back to the Planning Commission for their consideration, review and recommendation. 2. That the use of Westmoreland Drive as a commercial access paint to this site will not be allowed unless the affected portions of Westmoreland are redesigned to insure that commnercial related traffic is prohibited from entering the residential portions of Westmoreland. 3. That the Board obtain from the proposed developer sufficient and legal guarantees pertaining to the development of the site. These guarantees would insure that the proposed development of the site would minimize impacts on the adjacent residential areas 7 pertaining to items such as noise, traffic and buffering. In ,~.-~ addition, such guarantees could address design elements such as landscaping and signage in the hope that the proposal could ~.~.~ conform to many of the design recommendations contained in the Route 4Z9 Frontage Development Plan. ' 8 N •~ ~ ~ N ~ `-" Qi .~ ...e ~ ~~ d ~ cd ~ '?~ +~ N +~ o (Y.., z -~ ;;;,:~ c6 Q U O z ;a ,m U ym a ~ ~ O {~ a m ,q O h~ A p ~~. 0 40 ~. m P. ~ DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 5zo4 Bernard Dr,••, P.O. Sax 29800 i30aR4ke, VA 240 ~ 8 (S~a, 772-toss Fnx c5! o I i7?-2 ~ 08 ca~~a iecai !/' 1 apeficacien (ee: placards issued Casa Nunoer. r~CfSZ.~ data: r,4`..~ ~ r , i flC5 dace: „ \_~/•, i y x ~~~ I i `.~ c7 `~~ 7 -I ,;: :: rte, r ~% ~, t.. ,~ •'.r ~~:. E`~ ~ ~' •,~ SS~~ _ Ch ck type of application filed (check all that apply}: LLJ REZONING C1 SPECIAL USE ^VAA(A,NCE Appiicant's name: ~C,,~,~;,~~. ~.~~, , n-~;,Gx.,~ v~ S J~~.2~(c5of~ Fhene:~~7"13--3G~G Address: ~ ~, (,~~~ r~c~ ~~ ~~~~,~~ ~ f ~ Zip Cade: ~;~ a ~S Phone: Owner's name: t/~~ ~ \ P~ZC:~ ~ %r~2J` F Q ~+ '~ , , Address: Zip Code: ation of property: Lo c Tax Map Numoer: ~2 ` / l Dist ict: ~ M i i - - ~ ~,~ C ~,~~ ~ a r ag ster . ~ C~-~, • ~•a ~ c~~4. c~~ ~- . . ~-~,~. c(<<i~ Community Planning ~.rea: ~~ _ r ~f. ~ ~..t,~ Size of parce! (s}: pp Existing Zoning: 1`_a ~ ~-~ Gr-~C~ C'-~ C, l`-,~ `~.C"~ acres Existing Land Use: ~,~ ~~~-~~' ~,~~~ v2,G~~,.~- sq.ft. , .~, _ :'. :iii:' riyt. :,:• ~~:: :~::: •~ ~. :iii ii: Y ~: !~ :~'~•. Proposed Zoning: C ~, . ......................i F:r 5taif Usa On/y Proposed Land Usa: ~~,~. c-~.9~r~~vZCSz ~ ~ use Type: ,~ Does the part el meet the minimum fat area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES / NO iF N'0, A. VAnIA.NCE lS AEQUTAED FfRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria far the requested Usa Type? YES j/ NCB {F N0, A VAAIA,NCE !S AEClU(RED FEAST. If rezoning request, are cdnditions being proffered with this request? YES NO :,: . ,: :, `~ :, ::;; i: ~;~ ;i. ~: :; :,: :,. ,~ .;: ;I: .:t:. . ;,~,. iii;i ;~, r' viii .i~iii'i'ii ai' iEi iii"%E t• ~' ~ , Variance of Sections} of the Roanoke Cnunrf Zoning Ordinanc_ in order ta: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. RFFL!CATION WILL NOT 8E ACCE?TECH lF ANY OF THESE ITEMS AAE MISSING OA WCOMPLETE. ova/v ova v ws v Consultation S 1 /2" x 1 1 " concept plan Application fe=_ Apptication `~~'~ Me*.es and bounds description a"~::%s Proffers, if apolica~le '~j'" +~{'~ Ad'cinin ro erg ownErS Justification Water and sa~Ner application 1 9 p p Y l hereby c°rtrry chat / am either Fhe owner of the proper y or the owner's agent or canrracr purc:~aser and am actr'ng with the knowledge gird consent of the owner. "~wnar's Signature: Applicant . _.___ ___..---......~-----~_.~_.,__,[..______ ^-- -~ _.,____..,T~....-..._.____._.._._______... _. ~ - . J _ The Planning Camm!ssion will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification far the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following '`~ questions as thoroughly as passible. Use additional space if necessary. ' Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance fSectian 30-3} as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district~c!assification !n the zoning ordin~nc=_. This rezoning request furthers the purposes of the zoning ordinance by creating a location for new commercial retail and service uses that serve the needs of the citizens in Southwest County. The area is identified as Core by the 1985 Comprehensive Plan and is adjacent to Route 419 and US Route 221 (Brambleton Avenue) Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. The Following general guidelines and policies in the Comprehensive Plan are met: Policy C-1: Encourage the development of intensive, mixed-use urban development in designated Core areas Policy C-2: Serve each-Core area by an arterial or higher grade street Policy C-4: Coordinate the design of commercial sites with regards to on-site vehicular movement; access, building characteristics, signage and site amenities Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoin!ng properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, reads, schools, parks/recreation, and ftrelrescue. The rezoning request seeks to create a suitable location for new business development as specified in Objective 3 in the Roanoke County Economic Development Strategy (April 1998) Business Attraction Program Strategy - "Identify potential commercial and industrial sites and work with the property owner, community and County staff to have the property rezoned for an appropriate commercial or industrial use." Couti~y staff is designing an realignment and relocation of Westmoreland Avenue so that a proposed access to the site can have ingress/egress at a proposed traffic signal at Westmoreland and Brambleton at the entrance of Cave Spring Comers shopping center. A water line improvement~ro~ect from Colonial Avenue is being designed and planned by Roanoke County and will provide an extension mto this site with a I2-inch water Line ROANOKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT O.F ROANOI~E' COUN7'~ BOA.PD OF SUP~'RVISOI~?S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PR OPOSEI.~ REZONING FROM R- ~,R-2 ANA C-2c ?'0 C-,2 1littiuttttttttlttttttttttttttttitittttittlttltittt1111tiliittltlitlllttillllllt111lliltliililllllill~liltllll1111111iIIlIIIIIIl1IjjJ _ ~ ~ _ c AGENDA ITEM NO. ~^ ~ c -. APPE CE REQUEST c PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS .- r ~ ~~ sUBJECT: ~Q i» c ~ e.,~v?'`' !fie z a n r n9- T would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the = meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS - FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY~ THE GUIDELINES LISTED .:, BELOW: - ® Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment ~, whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman. will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, v and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority otgthe Board to do otherwise. . _.. . r. ... ® Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. c Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. `: ® All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. - ;~ s i.vv e _ ^_ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ _ ^ Speakers are requested to Leave any mitten statements and/or comments °°' with the clerk. _ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK A UTHORIZA. TION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. c _ ' „_ ~ o ;: PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK ~- s ~~ - ~~ ,~ ~.~ a s ~~ .ems ~~ NAME ~ ,~ `_ ADDRESS ~ ~ ~~ .:. ,.. __ ._ s ~ ~. PHONE ~ ~ / _ ~ ~ ~ I U~C.~..~~ l.~ ~~-v~~ mumuinuanumummimmmuuumuuuni minnu~ num a uui nnnumumi n imuumifll ~~ /~. ~- Uttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttlttttttltllitltttttlttlllllililliilllllllllllllllllllillllillllilllliillllllllilll,l~ ~ - ~_ ~..'1 - AGENDA ITEM NO. ~~ APPE CE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS c 7c. ~' L d /'~ f /"3~ - SUBJECT: ~©/~ ~.° ~ ~-° {~ - ~~ - ~~ - ~ ~ ~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WEIEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS c FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY ~ THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ~_ ._ ® Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman. will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, v and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority otgthe Board to = do otherwise. _ _.. ... ® Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. s Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. s ~'~ c ® All comments -must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized e. speaker and audience members is not allowed. - _ ~~ s .v e _ ®- Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. =- .~ ® Speakers are requested to Ieave any written statements and/or comments "' with the clerk. ._ e INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. . ~_ s a ~• a~ . ~~ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY A.ND GIVE TO THE CLERK i ~~ ! ~~ ~~ _ _ _ 'lease -~'~ ./1. cvr»p/e f-~.Jy oc~.-f ~. _ _ _ e - _ .._ ~' NAME ~ ,~ ~~~~ ..~ ~.. ADDRESS 3O3 - ~ ~' s ~~ PHONE ~ '- ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ m111I1111I1111111II111IIllIllllilllllllllllllllilllllllillllllilll1111111t 11II11III I111111111iI11IIIllillllillm n 1 J ~1101tlllttttttttttttttllttt~~iltttttttttttttlttt~ttttitilitttttttttlllitllttlilillllUllillill11111111111tlllllillillllllltlltilj,(J 4 ~ ~ _ _ -_ w -_ ~~ 3 ~ ~~ / ~ AGENDA ITEM NO. APPE CE REQUEST = _ _ __ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS c SUBJECT: ~~ /~'} e ~ e ~t J~~° Z D /"> I n G~ J c I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. V4'HEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY~ THE GUIDELINES LISTED .:, BELOV6': i ® Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman. will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ofgthe Board to = do otherwise. . ° . o ® Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. . Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. .~ s ® All comments -must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. - s~ s e ®- Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ ,.~ ® Speakers are requested to Ieave any mitten statements and/or comments c = with the clerk. _ s_ _ ,~ ® INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROTIP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. c PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK ~ `- ~.. s r~ ~~ ~~ ua~ ~ - - - ~ ~ _ e i ^_ ~. NAME ~~ ~ ~tie.,e ~ C~~y~--~ ,- _ ~. ... = ~-- ADDRESS ~ (~-~c~~~ ~ -_ PHONE ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ,~ 1Q C- n a s ~~ i _ mIt111111111111I1ii11111111lltlillll[llffllil~llllllflilllll1111111111t11111(11 1111111 Ifll illllllllillll111 11111111111m Uttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt~tttttittttttttttttttli11111ii1ii111iilllillllillllllllifllllllllflllllllltltlitlllllllllllilllllllj,~ d ~ ~. ,~ ~~D "" /~ ~ __ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. ^ ~ c _ APPE CE REQUEST =_ c PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS • SUBJECT: ~®~ ~° ~ ~..° ~1G~'f" ~'e z o n ~ n _ .~ T would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I VYILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS c FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED .:, BELOW: '_~ c ® Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment c whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman. will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, _. and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority o~the Board to ;~ do otherwise. _ - _ ® Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of ~ view only. c Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c ® All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized °° speaker and audience members is not allowed. - _ v ®_ Bath speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. °= ® Speakers are requested to Leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. :. a INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BF,HALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. ,-' . _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK s .~ ~.~ ~_ - y - ~ _ ~ _ ~ a _~ i ~_ ..a ~~ NAME ~.~-~ti C~- ~ ~~ a.. - ,,... a_ i ADDRESS ~~ ~~C~ ~,~.~.~~ ~,~L ~ ~ .:. ... c '- PHONE :7 ~ - c~ o~ ~ ~~ C~ ,_ mill!!!!illi11111111111111Illlllllll[IIIIIIIIIIIIIIilllili1111111111!1111111[ Illllll!!lIIIIII 111111111111 I111111111111111111'm ~'Vsi ~~ ~ ,~ ~~ C~~ j(tlliilllliillliill1i11111lillllilllltliiillillllllllllllll11111Iilllllilllliil11111I1ill~illlll~l~l~11~l1111111111~1111111111111~ a - ~~ ,~~o _ _ __ -- ~ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~~ ~ c -_ -_ .APPE CE REQUEST - PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS / ' ~p ~ c SUBJECT: ~O ~ l° ~ ~..° ~T~ /` ~C' Z D /"~ / /~ G7 - ./ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the 0 meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WETEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I Vt'ILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS ° FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY~ THE GUIDELINES LISTED ._ BELOW: -" o ® Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment .e whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman- will s decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, v and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ofgthe Board to do otherwise. . _.. ® Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. c s Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _. ® All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized s speaker and audience members is not allowed. - _ v ®_ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ® Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ::. ® INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GRDUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. c PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK i ~~ ]~ ~~ ~~ ~~ I~ ~~ e Tease. -I~'~ -/ / - C.o r»~ le i~/c~. p tc..~f _ _ - ~ ~ _ e s NAME Q/~.~ ~. ~'~~ .- ~ -_ J~ ~~ ADDRESS ~ ~ Q ~ a,L C~~v ~ c ._ c . ~~ '- PHONE ~ ~ ~ J I mllllllllllllllllililllillllllllllllllllllllllilllll IIUII II IIIlillll~llll~llllll~ll~l 1~IIUillllillllllllllllllllllllm (:t~~_ Utttittttttttttttttittittttittttttttttttitttttittttttittlltttttttllliitltlltltitit11llttililillfililillttililili11111111111111111~,~J _ ~ ~ -- /a c AGENDA ITEM NO. ~~ ~ c _ ... e .~~~ CE RriQ~EST c _ _. __ -_ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS ... =_ SUBJECT: Jr'~©~ ~° ~ ~°~G~f ~t° L D /~ I /~ o ~; I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the 0 meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS v FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY~ THE GUIDELINES LISTED .~ BELOW: c _ =_ ® Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment c ° whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman. will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the maJority of the Board to do otherwise. .:: . ® Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. s ~~ ~ ~ ® All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. r. _ ®. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. °° = ® Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c with the clerk. s ~ ^~ ~~ ® INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITTY THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK =_ i ~~ ~~ ~~ 7~ ~ ~~ ~~ m11111111111111I11I1111111I11111111II11111111111[II11111111111111111I1(llilllililllllllillllllllllllllllllllillllllll111lllllitllm Uttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttl1111ilt!!!!liilliiliiiiillllllllitllllllllll11lulllllll11111111111111111i1,~jJ ~ _ c AGENDA ITEM NO. ~~ /~ - =_ -_ a ~ __ APPE CE REQUEST _. ~ - ,PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS -. -. SUBJECT: ~G ~ ~.° ~ ~.° ~?~" J~L° Z D /'~ / /~ G~ _ J _. .. -_ o I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS o FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED = BELOW: ® Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment c ~. whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman. will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority o~the Board to do otherwise. . _.. ® Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of ~ view only, c Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ® All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. - _. ._ _ ®. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. °' ® Speakers are requested to Ieave any written statements and/or comments = with the clerk. _ = a INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP `c SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP = ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. ,,,_ ~. .. c PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK c c mlllliili111111111i11llililllflllllillllllll1111[iilililllllllllllilll(lllllllllllllillllilllllillllllllllllilllllilllliillllllil~ utttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttlttlltlt1111lttitililllllltlllliftllllilllllllilillltllllitilililllllllltil,~,~ - ~ __ ~ -- __ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~~ -- APPE CE REQUEST __ ,PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS _ f- ezonrn9- suBJECT: ~o /Y3 e ~ e ~ !~ T would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. r WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS ° FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: =_ - ® Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment m whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman- will c o decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority otgthe Board to ,~: do otherwise. _ _. - _ _. _ ® Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. s Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ,_ ® All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized s speaker and audience members is not allowed. - c ~ s As e =: ®. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _. _ .~ ® Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c with the clerk. ._. _ ® INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP s SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - c .~ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK -- c = '"~l~ase. ~'~ ./~ . cor»p1e f~Jy oc,c..°f - _ - ~ ~ _ mtI1IlIIIIIIIIIIIfIIIIIilIl11111111111111ifiillll11111(IIIi11lII1111I111111IIlIIIIIIIillill1111IIIIIIIIIIIIi11I11111IlIlIIIIIiIlinl _Uilliitlttltttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttitttttttttilltiilttiliiiliiiliillllillllllflllllillllllll~IIIIllllliilllllllllllllllll,(,tJ ~ _ /~ ~ - _ - ~ _ =_ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~A ~ - APPE CE REQUEST ~" -_ ~ w PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS c -_ s ~~ SUBJECT: I r-~D ~'? P ~ e ~pT~' ~~° L O /"~ I /~ G~ ./ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS o FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY~ THE GUIDELINES LISTED _, BELOW: ® Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman- will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority o~the Board to .~.~ ~" do otherwise. _ ... - - - ® Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. . Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. s s_ ® All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. - .... ~- ®- Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. .r ~- ,~ ® Speakers are requested to Leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. c ,~ ® INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TD REPRESENT THEM. ;: PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK _. s ~ 7~ .~ ~~ ~ please. -F'% .// . comp le {~.l y oc~.-f .. - mtlIIIIII111111IIIII111111111flllllIl111111111111111it I11t11111111111111111111111111111111I111111111111111111111II1I11111It Illlllm _UtIti111111111il111111{llilllUlillUlillllillllllllilllllltlllll11111Itlllllll{f1111111111111111U111111llilillllllll IIIII.~ ~_ a rr~ ~ ,?~ ,e. o / S ~~~~ s ~ ~ ~~ _ ~^ AGENDA ITEM NO. -. APPE CE REQUEST s __ c PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS _ g c SUBJECT: ~~ ~ ~.° ~ ~° ~f ~e z o n i n _ _ __ i e _; I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY~ THE GUIDELINES LISTED .r BELOW: ® Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment v. whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman. will decide the time lzmit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority o~the Board to = do otherwise. .::.. ® Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ c ® All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. - v ® ®. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ~. -_ _ ® Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments .~ = with the clerk. '_- ®_ _ ,.:. ® INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BF,HALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP = SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. s ~ a.a _ r~ ~. .PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY A_ND GIVE TO THE CLERK ~ :_- i ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ Yi.1 = Tease ~'~ ./ l - core le f~l t~ pc,~..°°f - s ~_ ~~ _ •~ ~ ~~ r~ a ..~ _ _ d 1 ~: NAME ,~ e.,~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~. ~.. n /~-~~ a ADDRESS ) ` ' ~,~~ <J ~ ?C~~ ~ ~~ i^ - ~ _ .~ ~~ ~~ .~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ PHONE ~ - ~~~r~ ~~ mlll{IIIIIIIIIIIIIilllll IIIlI111111I111111111111111111l11111111i111111111111flIIIl1I111111111111111111111111iI1111111111Iilllillim Uttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttilllllttllllllllilllllllllillllilltllllllllllll11111111ti11111Illlllillll[II.l,~ s ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ t 1 AGENDA ITEM NO. _ e APPS CE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: !~-IID ~ C: ~ ~° ,~?f /t t° Z D /'~ / /~ s ~~ s ~~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY~ THE GUIDELINES LISTED :, BELOW: ~ -" o ® Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment ,e whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman- will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, ,_ .= and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. .::. ® s ~ ~ ® Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. c a Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. e ® All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. - =. ~~ s .~ 0 _ ®. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. s ~~ o. ,®. ® Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments _~ with the clerk. =_ e INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. w. ~~ r~ a ~ ~ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK _„ c . y .. _ - mlllllllillilltlliilillilllllllillllllllllll111111111111111111111111111tII11I1111111111111111111111I11lllilliilllllillillllllllllm alit~~~~tt~tttttttttttttttttittitttittttttttttitttttt11t1i1111t11111111!11111111111111111Iiiilllllllllllllliltllilllillilllllllill,~ c - _____ - =_ - _ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~^ - - - - = APP'E ~E REQUEST - __ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS c t ~zonin sUBJECT: r~-~©i» e ~ e~ !~ - s ~~ ~ ~~ a - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. = WiiEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS ~_ FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED .r BELOW: -_ ® Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment c whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman- will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, c and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of~the Board to do otherwise. - ® Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ® All comments -must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. _= ... ®. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ - = ® Speakers are requested to Leave any written statements and/or comments = with the clerk. ' ® = ® INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP c SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c o ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - . _ =.. ~ - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - ,= - -_ - - - s _. Tease. ~'~ ./~ - C.or»,~le ~t~ p~--~' - ~~ ~~ ~~ mllillll1111111IIllII11Il11llllllllllllflllll111I111111IItlII11111111I11111It1{111111111I1l1111111111111111111111111111111111111i'm Utttttutttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttitllittttitittitliitllitlitflliliiili11i11111i11lllittit 111 illlllll f111111i1 jjJ /~'~ ~ ~q - - _ - ' AGENDA ITEM NO. ~~ ~ _ c APPE CE REQUEST ,PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS s s - sUBJECT: ~o i» e ~ e ~?'`- ~e ~ O n / n c~- - ~~ a J -_ - T would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS c o FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY~ THE GUIDELINES LISTED ._ BELOW: c _ ® Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment = =. whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman- will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority otgthe Board to = ... ,.. _ _. ° do otherwise. s ° o- ® Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only, ,- . Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c s ~- ® All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. c ®. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ° ~.. ® Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments .- with the clerk. _ __ _ ,~. ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GR 0 UP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP = ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK _. _.. ~. _. -. _ ~ C~t..'7,t' Tease -F'; ./ / - C.Q,~r,,p /~ ~./t~. s a~ ~ _ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ mill{1![ii111l1fllillllilllllllllll1111111111111[111111111111111111111111i1111111111111111lill11111111111111111111111111111111I11'm Ullttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttittltilttt11111ilillillillllllllllllllfll111l111111111111111llllilllilil~,~ _ - AGENDA ITEM NO. ~A s _ APPE~-RAN~E REQUEST = -_ __ - PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS o -_ s ~~ - suBJECT: r~-~o i» e ~ e_,~'f" !~'e i. D n 1 n c~- _ J - _ - - ~ - ~ o I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY'~ THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: .:., -_ o ~ ® Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman. will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, °- and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority o~the Board to do otherwise. - _ - -_ ® Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ® All comments -must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ®_ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ '°' ® Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. - e. __ ® INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP _ SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c o ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. ... _ .~,. ~ ,. .:. ~ _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK _. ._ __ ,.J NAME '" ~~ s -~ ~ ~- ~~ a // /~ ~~ ADDRESS ~~ O ~~~C~ a~~'~~~P~ G'G~ a ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ r~ ~ PHONE ~~ ~ ~~~~ m111111111111Illllllllillilllllllllllllllllllllllll11111111111i11i11llltlllllllllllliillllllllllllllllllll11111111111111111111111m Ulilillllllillii11111111iillllllllliililllllllllllllililllilllllllll111111111111i11111111111111111111111111111111111111flllllllll~ ~ ~ _ ~ om~ .~~. o~ ~ o _ __ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~A c c APPE CE REQUEST ,PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS .. SUBJECT: ~G- . / c° ~~/ e>~ / ~ -- m / t~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the ~ s meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. =_ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS c ._ FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY~~ THE GUIDELINES LISTED = BELOW: r =: ® Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment c o:. whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman- will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, ,_ v and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of~the Board to ;.~ do otherwise. - c y.. ® Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only, Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c ,.. ® All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. - ..... ®- Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. :_ ~ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. :. ® INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ® ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. .~ s ~_ -_ s. ~ ~ ,= PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK ... ~ ,_ mlllgllllllllllllil11111111111111111111((fill(111111IIIi111111111i1I11111111!{Illllllll1111111111111111111Ii11111111111I1111f111m U1111111111111I11i11111i1i11111111111111111illlillli1111111111111611111111111111111l111llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllfl~llllllll,~ ~')') °~.. ~ ~ D ° zs - __ - - _ AGENDA ITEM NO. ^ ~ c - o APPE CE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS c - ~ - _ SUBJECT: ./ _ -_ - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the e ~_ meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. = WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS °_ FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY~ THE GUIDELINES LISTED v ,_ s BELOW: '- ®~~ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment ~. whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman- will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, .= and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ot~the Board to do otherwise. - _ - - . s o ® Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. .Questions of clarification may ire entertained by the Chairman. - - ._ - ® All comments -must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized s speaker and audience members is not allowed. - -~- =~ - s ®. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times, ® Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments - with the clerk. c - - .~. e INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TD REPRESENT THEM. - .~ - - ~.. . , - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK c - _.. ~ - - - please. -F'% ./ / - c.orY, p /e f~Jy oc.c..-f - _ ._ _ __ - mtlilllllillilll1111111111111liilll1111illliilll1111fi11111i1lifilllllilllillillillllllllllllllllilllllilllltllllllllllillllli111~ Utttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttiti11111111t11llllilllllilliilliliilllllill111111111111111t111111111111111111j,t,J /~ ~ _ D ~ ~._. ~ ~. o '" z~ _ - - _ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~~ ~ c s AA ° APPS ~E REQUEST ... ~~ ~ ~~ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS e °° ~ s t ~zon~n9- - ° SUBJECT: t-~G ~ t.° ~ ~° ~ /~ _ c I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS c o FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY~ THE GUIDELINES LISTED .= BELOW: -_ c =° °~ ® Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment m whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman. will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, .:_ and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to = do otherwise. ® -_. s ® ~ ® Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ~: ® All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. ~_ ® Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ _ ® Speakers are requested to Ieave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. _ __ ~ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c 0 ~ ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. ,,,, _ ,= ., ~: PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK -- -_ _ v ;_ ®. ~~ ~~ ~~ • ~~ _ ~° mllllill1111111IIIi11111l1111tI1111I[1lfllllllllllllllllllllllli111111i111fI11111111li1llll111tilllllf111111111111111111111111111m Utttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttitilltttitlttilititlllllllflllitfllll1l11111111111!llilflllillfilllilllllllj~ Z~ ' ~ o /)') ~ ~ ~P D ~ r _ _ = ~ ~. ~. - ._ ' AGENDA ITEM NO. ~. __ -_ v _ ~~ APPS CE R.~QUEST _ ~. - _ = PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS c = f- ezanrn~- - suBJECT: ~-,loi» e ~ e,~ ~ _ - _ __ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY~ THE GUIDELINES LISTED :. BELOW: s _ ~~ c ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman- will c decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, _ and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority otgthe Board to do otherwise. _ s __ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments -must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. y~ s ^. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. =. _ ... _ ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c with the clerk. __ _ _ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERX AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP = ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. ~. ,= e = PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK _., c a ~. = 'area se. -F'~ ./ l - co r»~ le {-~.,1 c~ o~-f a~ ~~ ~~ .~ ~~ e ~- ~~ ~~ ~ +~ 4~ ~' f .. ~ ... '~ NAME ~- _ __ ~ ~ ~~ ADDRESS ~ CC,/~ .. _ PHONE `~ ~ ~~ ~-" ~ ~l ~ c mlilglilllillltlilllilllllllllllill111fl1111111111111lllilllllillllllllllll[111111Il111111111111111111111II111111111111Illllitllm U~Ill~lll~~~lllll~l~I~Il~~t~l~ll1~~l11tt~1111l~11~~11t111tl1111illtliilt~llltlliflllllfllillit1111il111tl11111111111 11111 ~ - _ _ orn ~. ~~0 2 g - -_ ---- _ c AGENDA ITEM NO. .. -. AP]PE CE REQUEST __ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS t ~z.onln9- _ SUBJECT: 1~-~G ~'» e ~ e ~ ~ - __ s I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY~ THE GUIDELINES LISTED .r BELOW: ~_ r ® Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman. will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, = and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to = do otherwise. . ® Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of ~ view only. c Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ - ® All comments -must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized = s speaker and audience members is not allowed. ® - s .... - ®. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. . - ® ~ Speakers are requested to Ieave any written statements and/or comments _ = with the clerk. __ ~. -_ _ v ® INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP = ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. .~ - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK _. - -_ ~~ a .~a. ~~ ... ,t~ O c,~..°f _ - _ _ - __ __ mill{I111i111Illlil1111IIllllllillllllllllf11111Illlil(11IllIIli1111111111111tlilllllillllllllflllllllll1111111Illllllilllllliili'~ Uttttttttttttttltttttttttttttttttttttttttttltltltti1111111111111111111111111111111111i111ifiilill11111111ii11111i1111111111111U1j,ll _ ~ ~ - z = 9 - AGENDA ITEM NO. ~~ ~.~ /~ -_ ~~ v i ~ ~~ C3J JLLa1QUiJY.! .L ~~ ~~ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS ° - .~ ^ I• = ° SUBJECT: !~'~©/Y) ~° ~ ~° ~ ~ - a - ° - ® - ~'° - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY~ THE GUIDELINES LISTED .:, BELOW: _~ ® Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment = °,, whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman- will _- decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority o~the Board to = do otherwise. - _ - s .a - _ ® Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. . Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. - - ® All ,comments -must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized ® speaker and audience members is not allowed. - - s_ ~~ ®. Bath speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. - s ~ - _ ® Speakers are requested to Leave any written statements and/or comments e °'" wzth the clerk. - - ®_ - = a INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GRD UP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP = ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. ,:.. - _ ~.. - ~: PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK ._ :_. _ ~~- lease. ~'% ./l - cor»,r~ le f~./r, o~..f = s -- ~~ ~~ _ _ ~_ mllllllllllllllllli1111111111111111111111 llllllilllilll1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111fllllllilllllll1111111111111~ Utlllll111111111I111111111t111111111i11111111111111111111111111llllllillllilillifllll~II11111111111lI~111lltlllll11111111 I11111,~ c - s ~~ ~~ rir o - s ~~ ~~ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. _ - _ - _ - APPE CE REQUEST - __ ,PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS f ~ Z d /'~ J /~ G~ _ SUBJECT: D /~ ~° ~ ~-°, ~ ~ ./ - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the ,, meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. r WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS ~, FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY~ THE GUIDELINES LISTED .r BELOW: _ i = ® Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman- will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to = do otherwise. . -:. . ~ - ~~ - _ ® Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. - -_ ® All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. - s ~.. -_ ~.. - ®_ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. =. - a... - °' = ® Speakers are requested to Ieave any written statements and/or comments "' with the clerk. - ~. -_ - - ,:= e INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WIT.B' THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP = ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT' THEM. o PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK - i ~~ e~ ~~ - - ~. ~~ - _ - ~ ~- mllllill1111111I11i1111111111f111111111111l1111111 tlllllllllliifllillllill11111111111111iII111111111111111111111111I1111111111111m U~1t111111~~1l11111~~~111it~11111i~1111111~~~1~I~1~111111t11111tt11111t1111(llfillllllltll1111111111illlftlltillillllil illlil~,ll _ _ °' 3 / = o ~ ~ s ~ ~~ .~ _ ~~ AGENDA ITEM NO. APPE CE REQUEST __ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS s _ _ • s ~ _ ©i» a ~e~c,t ~~ zonin _ -- SUBJECT: o ~~ ~~ s_ ~ ~ a. I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY~ THE GUIDELINES LISTED .:, BELOW: c _ _. ® Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment v. whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman. will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, _ .:. and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to = do otherwise. - .-. o ® Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. _ ~ Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ s ~~ ® All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ~., v. ®. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _. _ „~ ® Speakers are requested to Leave any written statements and/or comments c with the clerk. __ ® INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP o ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. ., PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK __ °_ ''~I~ase ~'%./l ~ C.ar»,ple fylt~. oaf s - ~~ ~~ ~~ m111111[111111(Iii11111111111111111I11i1lli111111(11111(l1111111111i11111111i11111111111flllllllllllllllllllllllllli1111111111~11m Uttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttltttlttitiltittltttttillillltttlt111lIIIl1111!liflllllillililllllillllllllll1111U,l,~ _ - AGENDA ITEM NO. .. ._ _. APPE CE REQ-[JEST _ +_ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS c ~_ SUBJECT: r~-~G /» ~° ~ ~+ ,Ap7~"' J'et° L d /'~ 1 /~ G~ ./ -_ a ~ T would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY' THE GUIDELINES LISTED c .., BELOW: '~ c _ o __ ® Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment a. whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman- will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. - _. ~ s ~~ ~ ® Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. . Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ® All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. - c .~ s ®. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. =- ® Speakers are requested to Leave any mitten statements and/or comments c ® with the clerk. v ® INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. .:. ~ ,. 0 ~~ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK _. 'Tease ~'i ./ l - C.ar»,~ le f-~I t1. oc,c..°f - - - - _ a NAME ~~ ~v,~ n ~,~ ~ 2 - ~. - __ -- ADDRESS ~~~~ ~U ~'~ ~ S % ~2 ,~ ~ ~ '-' a ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ /j ~ '" PHONE - ~ ~~ - ~ ~` ~ ~~ m1111111111111II[Iil1IIII1111111111I1111111111111l1111111111111i1111l111i11111111t1111111l111111111l11f1111111111111I111Illllilllm Utllllll1111111111l111liillillilllillllllllllllllilli1111111Illllilll111II111111111111i11111111111111111111111111U11i11 Illillij,~ ~ - 3 a ~~ AGENDA ITEM NO. APPE~~~ANCE RE VEST __ Q __ c PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS 4- - v ~~ ~ ~ ~_ sUBJECT: ~©i» e ~ e, ~~'` Jae z D n ~ ~ __ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS s FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED =_ .~ BELOW: -_ i O O ® Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment c whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman. will c e decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, v and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority otgthe Board to do otherwise. _ _. ..,~ s o ~ ® Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ,_ ® All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ... ®. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ,°. ® Speakers are requested to Ieave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. c ® INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP c SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c = ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. __ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK _.. i ~~ f~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ yr ~~ ';Tease. -F'~ ~/ l ~ cory~,Q le f`,I c~, oc,c..°f - - _ - ~ ~ - s --•.. ~. .~ ~~ -- NAME ~. ~~ ,. , ~ ~' ,`Yf. i~ i~0 7 ~. ~~~ ~7 ~ '_ ... ADDRESS ~ a ~ ~ -~..~_-e s~r.~ - ~,.~ f ~ ..~ ~..,~.-~ ... _ s = ~~ PHONE ~~ ~ `! ~ I _ _~ I ~~ m111{1111111111111i11Illlllll1111111i1111 lflI1111U1111111i111i11111111111111l111111111111111111111111111lllilllllllllillllllilllm Utttttttttttttttttttttttttttt~Itltttttlttttttttltttlttitllitt1111111111t111111111111IIIIliiiilllllillllllliilililillllllillllill~ a m c ,~ ~o /~ ~ _ -_ ---- _ AGENDA ITEM NO. _. -_ APPS CE REQUEST c PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS s a. - sUBJECT: ~©r» e~ e,~v~` ~e z o n i n _ _ =_ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS _, FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY~ THE GUIDELINES LISTED .= BELOW: "` =_ _ _' ® Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman. will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, v and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to ® do otherwise. _ _ _ r s s o~ o ® Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. c Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. s ~~ a~ ~~ _ ® All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. - c ®. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ .~ ® Speakers are requested to leave any mitten statements and/or comments = with the clerk. _ c ® INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GRO IIP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERX AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK i r~ ~~ rr a ~~ ~~ ~~ fillllill11111Illllilillilllllllllllllllll llillllllllilllllilllllllllllllllitlllUillillllllillllllillllllllllllllll111111illliillm Uttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttillliltttittttttlttllllitllfiillilttlllilllllllilllll11111111111111111111111ljJ - .3 ~ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~~ -. _. _ _ AP]PE CE R.~QUEST = ,PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS C0NIl12ENTS ... • _ f ezanin = sUBJECT: ~©i» e ~ e,tav ~' _ .9' I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED .r BELOW: _ ® Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment = whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman. will o decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ot~the Board to do otherwise. . = . r ® Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ v _ ® All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. ~~ s ..~ ~~ _ ®. Bath speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. c .,= ® Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c with the clerk. c v ® INDIVIDUALS SPEARING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. ,o ~ ~ __ ~- ~ r~ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK c i /~ ! ~~ "~Iease. ~'%_Cl. corns,/e f~.1 ©u..f - .1 - _ - mIIIl11III111IIlllillllil1111111111IIIIIIIfllllill11111111IIIIllli1111111111111111111111111II1t111ilUlillllil111lllllllllllll~li~11 Ullilllllllillllllllllll11111111i111i11111u111111iliiiilil11i11111111111111iIIi1lI1111111111111I1I1111111111I111111111111111111~jjJ ~ ome. ~ ~.~°~ - __ - 36 c AGENDA ITEM NO. ^ ~ c APPE CE REQUEST = _ _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS -_ -_ s ~ a r ~. sUBJECT: rt-~o i» e w e ~f- ~~ z a n ~ n _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the c meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. c WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY~~ THE GUIDELINES LISTED ._ BELOW: '_` c o ® Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment ® whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman. will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority o~the Board to do otherwise. _ _ ;. _ v s .v ~~ ® Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. c Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ® All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. - ar. s e ~. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. c °= ® Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c with the clerk. - ® INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GRO lIP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c =_ ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. ' =_ a ~ ~~ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK i ~~ i ~~ 7~ ~~ - ~ ~ - m111111111111II1I111111111111llllllllllll I111111111111f11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111II1111111111111111111111111111m uttttttiitttttttttttttttittttt~tttitttttittttltlttitttl111111tttttttllititlltlllt111lllllllliillilllitilllUlillllllllllillllliii~,-J a ~~ ~~ - - ~_ - 3 _ 8 = AGENDA ITEM NO. ~A _. s ~i J..I V.~l J\.LL(Q~iJFJ i s PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS .. SUBJECT: ~~ ~ ~° ~ '~° ~t J~t° Z O /'~ / /"3 J _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the ,= meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY~ THE GUIDELINES LISTED .r BELOW: r ® Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment ~, whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman- will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, ,_ v and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority o~the Board to do otherwise. - .::.. ... o ® Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. c i Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. s .~ u~ ~~ ® All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. - ® o. e ,~; ~- Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ~: o Speakers are requested to Leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. s ~~ a INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK i ~~ ~~ a~ - .~ ~~ ~ - - _ filiilllllllilllllllllliilllllllllll111111111111111111IIIlillllliii1111111111i1111111111111111111111111111111i11111lI111111111111('i~f Utttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttlttttlttllttttttltllllltlilllllilllillltlillillllllllllllltlllliilllilliillilili~ - - _ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~w _ _ -_ s 1 1-~ i jJ V.i..I i tip/ Q~~ 7/ i _ w ~~ v PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS c _ • ~rE ,~,lo i» c~ e,~f ~'~ z o n r n _ SUB CT: ~ c ,. I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. r WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS o FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY~ THE GUIDELINES LISTED ._ BELOW: -" c i _ ® Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment c v. whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman- will c e decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, v and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ofgthe Board to do otherwise. _ _ . ® Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. s Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ s _ ~~ ® All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. c _ s ..e. _ ,,:, ®. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ ,.:. ® Speakers are requested to Ieave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. v ,=. ® INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. ;: PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK ~. _ s _ s __ ~r~° Q S c° t' ~ ~ I ~ - C O MAD ~`° 1~I O t~t..'1'c' _ . _ _ _ _ ~ _ _ e ,.. _ _ ~ ... -- _ NAME - s-. ,_ _ _ ADDRESS / '" PHONE ~ ~ ~ `- mIII11111iIIfl11t1111111111111111111I11111IIIIIIl111111I1111llliil11111tlillflllllllill11111111111iillllllllillllllillilllillllllm ~tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttittttiiiiiiiiiiii11111illlllllllllllllllllill flllll~lllIIIIIII111111111111111111j,11 s ~ ~ ~~ ^~ ~~ __ /~ ~ ~-~ ~ / / ~~ V ~~ ' ~~ = AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ _ APPE CE REQUEST ~' PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS c ° ° _ o i» e~ e,~t ~~ z o n i n9- _ ° SUBJECT: c ° __ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the ~ s meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. - WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS c ° FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY~ THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: -_ ® Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman- will c =- decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, v and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ot~the Board to q do otherwise. - _. s ~ ® Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. . Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ., -_ ® All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized = s speaker and audience members is not allowed. s ev e _ ® Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ® Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = with the clerk. _ v ® IND.IVID UALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. 0 -_ a ~ .~ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK _.. .:. _. "mil ~ a s G ~' % . / l ~ C. o r~,Q l e i~'~! / t~ p rc..'7'~' ~. _ _ - ~~ O .° _~ s ~~ a° "' NAME 1 C~.U~- "' s- _ ~' ~ _ ADDRESS ~ c '" PHONE / ~ ~ ~ (~ ~ ~ _ mllllll1111111IIIiii111111111111111I1111IIIIIIII[llllii111i111111111111111111111111111lllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllill11111111m Utttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt-tttttttttttttt1111111111111111Iillllilllillillllllllilllllllllllilllllilillllllll11111iiui,! o /'~ ~._. ~ ~ D ,c,,c~ - - _ c AGENDA ITEM NO. c APPE~~]~ANCE REQUEST ~ s .-..'~ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS -_ ~_ s I ' ~ - sUBJECT: t-~D i» ~ ~ e ~?'`' ~~ Z D n ~ n c•~- _ ./ - _ - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS o FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY~ THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: s _, -_ ® Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment c whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman- will e decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority o~the Board to do otherwise. ~ s ® Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. c Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. -_ s ~~ ® All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. r~ s ®. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. __ °' ® Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments wath the clerk. `c ® INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. '~ c PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK c i ~~ s ~~ ~~ ~~ ~.~ ~` ~~ a = '~Iease. ~'~ ./l - corY,~le f~Jy Dc,c..~f ~~ ~ ~~ m111111I111111iiililillilllllllililIlllllllll111111111111ii11111111illltllllil1111111111111111ilillillltllllilllllllllllllilllili'~ ut~»ui~~~trss~~u~~~~~~~~~,~~~~~~~~~tlilllll~ili11111111111111t1l111i1!l111111f11lilttlllllllllllii1111ltllilllitllllllllllilllj,-~ ~ ~ _ ,~ - _ o /~ ~. ~ ~. o _ 3 = - ~-~ / _ = AGENDA ITEM NO. c _ -. _ ~p~ ~,~ RF Q~~~T c PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS ._ c 1 ' 7c. t° Z d /'~ I /~~ s SUBJECT: ~'7-©~ C ~ ~° {~ ~ -- s ~ ~ ~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GNE MY NAME AND ADDRESS ° FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY'~ THE GUIDELINES LISTED .: BELOW: c ® Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment e;. whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman- will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, °~- and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority o~the Board to do otherwise. _ =. s o ~~ ® Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. s ~~ ® All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. r s ie~ e ~ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. .e ® Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ® INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c o ~ ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. .. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK 'elect se ~'% ~/ / . C.o,~r),p /e fem.! oc.c..'f s U s j/ ~ ~~ ~~ a~ ~~ fi11111111111111111[11111111111111111111illfllllllllllll11111111111111111111111111111111111lIIIllillllllll111111111111111111111111~ Ut~t~tttltttttttttttttttttlttttttttttttttttttttttttltitt11111111111111flI11111111111111t111lilillllliiill111111111illllllll1111i1jj) -_ _ _~ c AGENDA ITEM NO. c APPE CE REQUEST ,PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS c SUBJECT: ~G ~ C ~ ~.°, ~,apT~ J~'c° z d /'~ / /') _. I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS o FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY~ THE GUIDELINES LISTED .r BELOW: .~ i ~~ ® Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman- will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ot~the Board to do otherwise. _ _. - ~. o ® Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. . Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. s ~~ ® All comments -must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. - == ®. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. c .,~ ® Speakers are requested to Ieave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. '- ® INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. -- ~.. . , PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK c _.. .: _ __ s ~~ = rr - ~ a~ ~ s ~ ~~ ~ e ~~ ~ ~ -.. NAME ~. .... r L~ ADDRESS ~ ~ i~ ~~~ -_ ~ _ PHONE ,~ C /r~~~~ %_ mllilllllllllllllli11111111lllllllll111111111111111111111illlllfili1111111111(1111111111111111tilllllllllllllllllllllliltilllltl(m u~ntttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttitliltittittttitilittlllllililllllllillillllllliilllllltilllillllllllllllll~J _ _ - ~b - __ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~~ APPE CE REQTTE~T PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS -_ __ s ~ suBJECT: ~c> ~» e ~ e ~7` ~'e z. a n ~ n~- _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. c WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS ~_ FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY~ THE GUIDELINES LISTED s BELOW: 0 a ~~ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment c whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman. will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, ;_ °- and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority otgthe Board to do otherwise. . _ - .. ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c s ~ r~ ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. e == ^. Bath speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ,® ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. s ~_ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. c c PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK _. i _ ~ ~ ~.~ I~ ~. r ~l~ase ~'% ~/ 1- C.or~nt~ le f~,/c~ oc,c.-f = _ _ _ _ - ~ ~ -- mllll11lillllili11i11111II111111111Illlfllll1111111111111ii111111111111t1111111111111Illlillillllllilllllllllllllllll111111111111~ jjllllltltl1111111111Iltlllllllllt1111111111i111111!l1111111111111111111111111111111111ft1~1l1~1~llllif~lll1~11Aillll~i11111111111,11) -_ ~_ o v - AGENDA ITEM NO. -. ... AIPP~ C~ RE Q VE,.S'I' __ e PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMI1'IENTS ~_ ~ ~-_ SUBJECT: I would Tike the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WI;IEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY~~ THE GUIDELINES LLSTED s BELOW: c ® Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman- will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, .~ and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ofgthe Board to do otherwise. ~ - _ - ~ s ® Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of~ view only. ,= Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. s ~~ s ~ ® All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized =. speaker and audience members is not allowed. ~ _; ~ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. •-- ~ ~ Speakers are requested to Leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ;' ® INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GR 0 UP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK A UTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. .; ....~ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK -= ... ... ~.. .. _. ,- - ~ - ,. _ - ~ - .s .~. ~ '- NAME ._. ~. __ _. _ ADDRESS .~(~~ ~~ t}-e~~-"~ ~iV ~ ~.t ~' -- ._ PHONE `I ~ ~ ` S ?~- m111111I1111111t11111111111111111i[IlIfI11111I[lil[111111111111i11111i1111111111l11111111111111[1111111111111[lil[lllllllltlll111'~ U~i~iu~iii~s11111111~~I~~t~~~i~li~l~ll~~Iltllll~~lf111l1111111lt111111111flllllililllltllfltlllltiil11!!llllllllllllilllllllllllj,~J ~ om ~e~. ~ ~. o ~ 5a = 0 __ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~^ ~ c s ~~ ~ ~~ '_ APPE CE REQUEST -_ v ~~ ~~ = PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS .. SUBJECT: lr'~O ~ t° ~ !° ~ ~ J I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. VVIiEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS ~_ FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY~ THE GUIDELINES LISTED s ~~ BELOW: ~_ n.~ ~~ ~ ~ ® Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman- will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to °' do otherwise. ,.. - - - _. ® Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. s ~~ ® All comments must be directed to fhe Board. Debate between arecognized c speaker and audience members is not allowed. - -_ ~~ s ®- Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. =. -- ~. ,=. ® Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. '"' ._ ® INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TD REPRESENT THEM. ,,_ a ~ ~ ;: PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK ;- .- -- .- _.. -- a ~ O' • ~ i ~~ fi/i~/ s ~~ _ ~~ mllillllfliliillllil111111Illlllllllll11111111111it11lilllilll1111111111111![1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111lillll111~1 ~ttttttttttttttttttttttttt~tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttitttttltlttttlt1111111111tltlltttlttt1111llltlittltlttllillllltllllllilllj~ -~ ~ ~ r~~,o ~B ~ AGENDA ITEM NO. c A~]P~ CE REQUES7~ = ~ _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS r ~ ~~_ SUBJECT: r. c T would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the c meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. c WHEN CALLED TO TI-IE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY~ THE GUIDELINES LLSTED BELOW: o ® Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman. will '~ decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ~ ~ - - - . .,. A ® Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. c Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. a ~~ s ~ c ~ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized _. speaker and audience members is not allowed. s ® Bath speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ~: ® Speakers are requested to Ieave any written statements and/or comments vnth the clerk ... ® INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON B.F.HALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. c .. -_ i .s.1 ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK -- i ~~ a ~~ ~~ o ~~ ~• a~ s ~~ ~ t~ a. - ~~ s ~ s~ ~ ~~ •~ ~ ~_~ ~~ mt11111[111111(I[11111111111111111[11i1111111111l11111111111111111111111111111111111111111illllli11111111111111i1111l111111111I1I~ Uilliilllliilflllll1111111llllllillllltll11111111tililllllllllil111lllllil111111111111111111111111111~111i11111111~~~~llllilllltll~f _, -_.~..~.. '~-7 _ c _ ,... ' AGENDA ITEM NO. APPE CE REQUEST _ _ .~ - ,PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS .., -_ v ~ ~~ ~ ~~ s suBJECT: ~-,/c~ i» e w e ~~"` aCe z o n e n9- _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY~ THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: .~ ® Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment c whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman- will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, ,_ and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of~the Board to do otherwise. _ = _ a s ~~ ® Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. s Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. s e_ c ® All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized s speaker and audience members is not allowed. - .= r~ s ~ e _ ®- Bath speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. °' ® Speakers are requested to leave any mitten statements and/or comments c _ "" with the clerk. _ s s ® INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. o _ ., PLEASE -PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK `_ i ~~ 7~ ~~ ~~ _ '~Iease ~'% -/l - conr,,r~ 1e f~/cJ Otc..•f - mI11111tI11111I1tIi111111111111II1111111fil1lllilllllltll11i1111111111IIIIIII1111111111111111111111111111111illlllillllllilllilllm U~~ttltlt{!!!!!!1ltl!!1lllt 1111f119ittlltlltlltll111lI{il llillllillllllllllllllli111(lillllll K , `.~~ -tom, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~ c~ _ . AGENDA ITEM NO. ... APPS CE REQU ST . - s w.. ~,.~ ~_ ~ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COIVIMENTS i s = SUBJECT: s ~~ ~~ ~~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the ... meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS v FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY~~ THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: .:. ® Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman. will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ot~the Board to do otherwise. - ~ - _- - '~` ~ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c s s ~~ c ® All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized _. speaker and audience members is not allowed. ~ - _ r ® Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ® Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk c a. ® INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON B-F:HALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ._ ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. m. ., PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK .- ~. -_ a ~~ ~~ ~.a ~~ ~. ~~ i~ .. ~~ .~ i~ s ~~ ~. ~~ ~~ v _ ~~ millllllllllltll111111111111111111111111111111111111111111Illlllllllllfll111I(11111111111111111111111111[11111111II1I11111i(11111~ Uut~n,utunttutnuuuntnttntuttttuututuutututtttttuttltlltilllltilillllllll111lilililllllllllilllilllilfll(1111,1) ~~ = DWt-l' ~D AGENDA ITEM NO. c APPE CE RE VEST .- _ _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS -_ ~- SUBJECT: __ c I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WREN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS v FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY~~ THE GUIDELINES LISTED e BELOW: ® Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman. will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of~the Board to do otherwise. ~ - = - ~ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only, c Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ® All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized _. speaker and audience members is not allowed. ~ s .r s ® Bath speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. e ® ~ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements andJor comments with the clerk. s. ® INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON B.F:HALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. . "' c .PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK . _ .. ... ,_ - __ r X111111111111111111111111111111111[1111illlllii11111111l11111111f11111111111ilf111111111!l11111111i11111111lI1111111111111i111111~ U~it~tutuuistful~tuuuul lululuu!!ulllullltU{11!lltt11111111111illlittlliltlllttlllltlllllllttl llUllil,~ a me...~ e..Q ~'' ~ ?~ - ~ - _ - AGENDA ITEM NO. c ._ ... A]P]P~ CE I~QUES7C' ~. s ..w ~... r ~ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMI1'IENTS s s SUBJECT: __ ~ e I would lake the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. v WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GTVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY~~ THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ._ ® Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman. will -' decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority ot~the Board to do otherwise. ~ ~ - ~ - . _ ® Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of ~ view only, ,= c Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ar s c ® All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized = . ~_ speaker and audience members is not allowed. ~ == • s ~~ e ® Bath speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at al_1 times. e ~. ~ ... ® ~ Speakers are requested to Ieave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. -- ® INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. .s.. ,. ~_ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK ,:., ._,. a ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ,~ ~~ ~~ e,~ ~~ ~lllill{l11111(1111111111111I1111i1I{llli{f{{{Il[lllllllliillllillillll1111![l111111111111111I111{i1111111Illllillllillllllllf111'~ U1111111161111iillilll lliiliill llliliillliiilillllilllillll!lIIIII 111111!l111lllittliilllll~lt1111111111l1l11111l1tllill11111(lll,(y,~ '- t~ D "" C..-~ r .~ s ~ AGENDA ITEM NO. A __ APPS CE R ~ QV~ST C ARING ORDINANCE 'CITIZENS COMMENTS c _ PUBLI HE _ ~_ ~ ~ .r SUBJECT: e I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the d meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY~~ THE GUIDELINES LISTED o BELOW: c ® Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman- will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, _ and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ~ ~ - = - r ® Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. c ® All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. a. s ® Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. e s rr ® ~ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. '- ~ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP - =° SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. c ,:. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK i ~~ a~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ O i ~I ~ ~~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~. 1~ ~~ .1~ ~~ ~~ .v ~~ I~IAME ~-- ADDRESS 07d S . s_ PHONE ~ l/) ~ ^ ~~Cv 2i mill[I1Illllll[1111111111I1I1111t11111I1111111t1I11111111ii11I111[II1111111I1l111111111111111111i11111111flllllilll11111111(I1111~ AT THE LAST MEETING MR. NATT CHALLENGED THIS BOARD IN RATHER FORCEFUL TERMS TO REMEMBER WHAT THIS IS ALL ABOUT IS "LAND USE." MR. NATT KNOWS, YOU KNOW AND I KNOW THIS ISSUE HERE IS NOT LAND USE, NEVER HAS BEEN, NEVER WILL BE. WHAT THIS IS REALLY ALL ABOUT IS GREED, AVARICE, MONEY. IT IS THAT PURE, THAT SIMPLE. IF MR NATT, WILL FOREGO ALL LEGAL FEES CONNECTED TO THIS TRANSACTION, THE LAND OWNERS WILL DONATE THE LAND, THE COUNTY WILL FOREGO COLLECTING ANY AND ALL TAXES AND HOME DEPOT WILL AGREE TO SELL NOTHING ABOVE COST AND LET LOWES AUDITORS KEEP THE BOOKS, THEN I WILL AGREE LAND USE IS THE ISSUE. HE WON'T, THEY WON'T, YOU WON'T AND HOME DEPOT WON'T. SO THE ISSUE IS MONEY. BUT BEYOND THAT IT IS ABOUT, RESPECT, HONOR, FAIRNESS, INTEGRITY, LOYALTY, RIGHT AND WRONG. NOT JUST WHAT IS LEGAL BUT WHAT IS RIGHT. THERE IS A DIFFERENCE. I DON'T KNOW WHEN WE BEGAN TO LOSE SIGHT OF THESE QUALITIES BUT I NOTICED IT FIRST IN CONNECTION WITH THE KROGER PROJECT IN SALEM. YOU REMEMBER, YOU WANTED TO BUILD A PRIVATE ACCESS ROAD TO THE KROGER WAREHOUSE, BUT ONE LAND OWNER DID NOT WANT TO SELL. APPARENTLY MR. MAHONEY CAME UP WITH THE BRILLIANT IDEA OF CALLING THIS CHICKEN A DUCK, THIS IS NOT REALLY A PRIVATE ROAD BUT IS ACTUALLY A PUBLIC ROAD. IT DOES NOT MATTER A NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT WAS REACHED TO SETTLE A LAW SUIT. THE POINT IS YOU WERE WILLING TO BEND AND, IN MY MIND, TAKE UNW TED LIBERTIES WITH THE EMINANT DOMAIN LAW TO ACHIEVE YOUR OWN DEVISH ENDS. SOMEONE IS GOING TO DEFEND THAT EXECUTION AS EXPEDIENT TO SAVE AND GAIN NEW JOBS. THE TRUTHFUL FACT IS, HOWEVER, THAT WHEN WE, AS A COMMUNITY, LOSE RESPECT FOR THE RIGHTS OF OUR NEIGHBORS, ALLOW LAWS DESIGNED FOR A MUCH NARROWER INTERPRETATION TO BE TWISTED AND USED AGAINST HIM TO FURTHER OUR OWN SELFISH INTEREST, WE ARE NO LONGER A COMMUNITY OF C1~-RING AND HONORABLE PEOPLE, BUT BECOME A COMMUNITY OF TYRANTS EAGER TO SACRIFICE ANY AND ALL PRECIOUS THINGS IN ORDER THAT WE MIGHT SURVIVE. FORGETTING THAT ONLY IN CARING FOR EACH OTHER, HONORING EACH OTHER, RESPECTING OUR LAWS AND USING THEM WISELY, NOT SLYLY, CAN WE HOPE TO TRULY SURVIVE. MR. NICKENS, MR. HARRISON IF YOU CANNOT GRASP AND APPRECIATE THAT TRUTH, WE CAN BUILD A SCHOOL ON EVERY CORNER AND OUR EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM WILL REMAIN A DISMAL FAILURE. MR. HODGE, I'M ALMOST CERTAIN YOU HAVE ADVISED YOUR CHILDREN NOT TO DRINK CERTAIN BEVERAGES, PARTICIPATE IN CERTAIN ACTIVITIES, WEAR SPECIFIC CLOTHING, ETC. NOT ~ BECAUSE IT IS ILLEGAL TO DO SO, BUT BECAUSE YOU CONSIDER IT WRONG. YOU, YOURSELF PROBABLY DO NOT DRINK ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, AGAIN NOT BECAUSE IT IS ILLEGAL BUT BECAUSE YOU CONSIDER IT WRONG. I DO NOT FAULT YOU IN ANY WAY FOR WHAT ~ ~ YOU BELIEVE, IN FACT I COMMEND YOU, BUT ~( WHERE IS THE MORAL BALANCE BETWEEN WHAT / ~I HAVE JUST MENTIONED AND YOU WALKING INTO SOMEONE' S HOME DEMANDING THEY SELL THEIR PROPERTY OR YOU WILL TAKE IT WHEN YOU KNOW EMINANT DOMAIN IS A STRETCH AT BEST. WHY ARE YOU NEGOTIATING FOR PROPERTY ANYWAY? WHY ISN'T HOME DEPOT DOING THEIR OWN NEGOTIATION? IS IT POSSIBLY, BECAUSE ONLY BY YOUR HAND CAN THE FULL WEIGHT OF FEAR AND INTIMIDATION BE BROUGHT TO BEAR. I DON'T RECALL ANY CITY OFFICIAL NEGOTIATING FOR LOWES OVER ON FRANKLIN ROAD. IN ALL THE PUBLICITY THAT PROJECT GENERATED, I DON'T RECALL ANY RESIDENT COMPLAINING HE HAD TO SELL OR BE EJECTED. APPARENTLY, LOWES DID THE HONORABLE THING BY NEGOTIATING FAIRLY AND WITHOUT COERTION. I WONDER WHY THE CITY OF ROANOKE DID NOT RESORT TO THE THREAT OF EMINANT DOMAIN? MAYBE IT' S BECAUSE THEY KNEW IT WAS NOT A TRUE EMINANT DOMAIN SITUATION AND HELD THE RIGHTS OF THEIR CITIZENS AND THEMSELVES IN GREATER RESPECT. TRUTHFULLY, I AM NOT AN EXPERT ON EMINANT DOMAIN, BUT IF MR. MAHONEY AND MR HODGE HAVE CORRECTLY INTERPRETED AND APPLIED THE LAW, THEN NO CITIZEN LIVING IN ROANOKE COUNTY OWNS A SINGLE PIECE OF PROPERTY. IT ALL BELONGS TO THE COUNTY AND WE ARE ONLY CARETAKERS UNTIL THEY WANT TO COME AND GET IT BY WHATEVER MEANS EXPEDIENT. FOR THIS REASON I AM NOW ASKING MY REPRESENTATIVE, MR MCNAMARA, TO ASK THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF VIRGINIA TO INVESTIGATE THESE TWO SITUATIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF DETERMINING IF LAWS HAVE BEEN CORRECTLY APPLIED AND IF COERSION AND INTIMIDATION ARE APPROPRIATE FOR THE CIRCUMSTANCES. C~~`~`~~ ~ ~,~7E~rsr FOR THE LAST MONTH OR SO WE HAVE HEARD A LOT ABOUT FAIRNESS. ALL THE WHILE OUR NEIGHBORS ARE BEING THREATENED, INTIMIDATED AND MANIPULATED. MISLEADING INFORMATION HAS BEEN LEAKED TO THE PRESS. NOT THE IDEAL CLIMATE TO EXPECT FAIR TREATMENT. GENTLEMEN, THE CITIZENS OF CAVE SPRING DESERVE BETTER FROM OUR PUBLIC AND ELECTED OFFICIALS. IF YOUR COMMITMEN`I, TO BE FAIR HAS ANY BELIEABLE S~JB~TANCE THEN THE SECOND VOTE ON THIS REZOI'~~NG ISS~JE MUST BE RECINDED. OTI~ERWISE YQ~~ PLEDGE IS HOLLOW AND DEAD. -. I the undersigned concerned citizen do hereby state that I support the rezoning of the land at the intersection Rt.419 and Rt.221 for the development of a Home Depot Store. Name Address ~~~s ~-~~:~ ~ s. ~ ~, ~a1 ~ ~+~~ ~2<z~~ c<<,~r ~-~ a ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~a ~ ~ S~ ~ ~lo~ s. ~ !rv ~~ D ~ /D tic ~ ~ axe ~ ~~ Iti(~ic , , J ~3 t~ ~~~U~~ . ~~, ~cc U~ z~~~ s-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 13, 1998 ORDINANCE 101398-6 APPROVING THE EXERCISE OF AN OPTION TO PURCHASE AGREEMENT WITH KENNETH A. KEENEY AND CATHERINE L. KEENEY FOR 0.254 ACRE, MORE OR LESS, (BEING IDENTIFIED AS COUNTY TAX MAP PARCEL 77.13-5-31) WHEREAS, by Resolution 071498-7, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County approved the Option to Purchase Agreement dated July 14, 1998, with Kenneth A. Keeney and Catherine L. Keeney for an option to purchase 0.254 acre, more or less, being further shown on the Roanoke County land records as Tax Map Number 77.13-5-31 ("the Property"); and, WHEREAS, under the terms of said agreement, the purchase price for the Property is $125,000, and the option must be exercised on or before January 9, 1999; and, WHEREAS, the agreement provides for settlement within 60 days from the date of notice of exercise of the Option by the Board of Supervisors; and WHEREAS, the property is necessary for the construction of the proposed Home Depot commercial development project, and the funds are available in the Economic Development Public/Private Partnership account; and WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs that the acquisition and conveyance of real estate interests be accomplished by ordinance; the first reading of this ordinance was held on September 22, 1998; the second reading was held on October 13, 1998. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to exercise the option to purchase from Kenneth A. Keeney and Catherine L. Keeney following described real estate, to-wit: All that certain tract or parcel of land, together with any improvements thereon, rights incident thereto, and appurtenances thereunto belonging, situate in the Cave Spring Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, containing 0.254 acres, more or less, and more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point on the south side of Westmoreland Drive, which point of beginning is the common corner to Lots 1 and 4, Section 6 as shown on the map of Mount Vernon Heights, recorded in Plat Book 2, page 67, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court for the County of Roanoke, Virginia; thence leaving Mount Vernon Heights and along and with the west line of Lot 4, S. 10 deg. 03' W. 254.38 feet to a point; thence S. 72 deg. 32' E. 31.65 feet to a point; thence along and with a new division line through Lot 4, N. 15 deg. 48' 51" E. 247.99 feet to a point on the south side of Westmoreland Drive; thence along and with the south side of Westmoreland Drive, N. 68 deg. 11' W. 57.5 feet to the point of Beginning, and being the western portion of Lot 4, Section 6, of said Mount Vernon Heights Subdivision, and designated as New Lot 4-A as shown on plat of survey made by Jack G. Bess, CLS, dated January 3, 1991, recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 1335, page 1524. Said real estate being further shown and designated upon the Roanoke County land records as Tax Map Number 77.13-5-31, and having a street address of 3319 Westmoreland Drive, SW, Roanoke, Virginia. This being all of the same real estate acquired by the Grantor from the Cave Spring First Aid and Rescue Squad, Inc., by deed dated 1/4/91, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 1335, page 1522. 2. That the County Administrator or Assistant County Administrators are hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County in this matter as are necessary to accomplish the exercise of the option, all of which shall be approved as to form by the County Attorney. 2 3. That the Board appropriates the sum of $134,000 from the Economic Development PubliGPrivate Partnership account for the acquisition of this real estate and related expense. 4. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: .~• Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Timothy W. Gubala, Director, Economic Development U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA-8\OCT98\10-13KEE.#06 3 ACTION NO. ITEM NO . ~ "~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 13, 1998 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance to exercise an option with Kenneth A. Keeney and Catherine L. Keeney to purchase approximately. 0.254 acres on Westmoreland Avenue (being Tax Map No. 77.13-5-31) in connection with an economic development project located off Virginia Route 419 and U. S. Route 221 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: I am asking the Board to authorize the staff to execute the purchase option on the Keeney property. We originally obtained an option on the 1/4 acre lot when the Home Depot rezoning was initiated. At that time, it was determined that the Keeney and Rose properties would be needed for road improvements to support new commercial development at the intersection of 419 and 221. These road improvements would provide additional safety at an already dangerous intersection where Westmoreland Drive intersects with Brambleton Avenue. The construction of the cul-de-sac at Westmoreland would also prevent through traffic from the development into the residential neighborhood. When this was originally brought to the Board, we discussed the desirability of purchasing these properties regardless of whether or not the rezoning was approved. If any or all of these properties are not needed for road improvements they can easily be sold to adjoining property owners to recoup the County's costs. Of primary importance, is the recognition of continued growth in the area. The purchase of these properties will help us address these issues. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY' Roanoke County is assisting commercial development located at Route 419 and U.S. Route 221 in the in the proposed Home Depot the intersection of Virginia Cave Spring area. Kenneth A. Keeney and Catherine L. Keeney own a 0.254 acre tract upon which it is proposed to locate access to a realignment and reconstructed Westmoreland Avenue (State Route 1607). Roanoke County negotiated an option to purchase agreement with the Keeneys and is desirous to exercise the option so that site development for this project may proceed. The Board of Supervisors approved the option to purchase agreement on July 14, 1998. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The subject property is necessary for the construction of G:\COMMON\OCT13\KEENEY.RPT 1 ~i access to a realignment (State Route 1607). This Catherine L. Keeney and is the attached ordinance. and reconstructed Westmoreland Avenue lot is owned by Kenneth A. Keeney and described in the legal description in The County Administrator has negotiated a purchase price of $125,000. The second reading of this ordinance is scheduled for October 13, 1998. Staff recommends that Roanoke County begin the process to acquire this 0.254 acre lot. FISCAL IMPACTS• An appropriation of $125,000, plus other costs and expenses including various survey, environmental assessment, and settlement costs of approximately $9,4000 is required. This amount is available in the Economic Development public private partnership account. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt the second reading of the proposed ordinance approving the exercise of an option to purchase agreement with Kenneth A. Keeney and Catherine L. Keeney. Respectfully submitted, .....--r"~-• Timothy W Gubala, Director Depart of Economic Development Approved, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Ref erred to Motion by Vote No Yes Abs Harrison Johnson McNamara Minnix Nickens G:\COMMON\OCT13\KEENEY.RPT 2 . S~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, OCTOBER 13, 1998 ORDINANCE APPROVING THE EXERCISE OF AN OPTION TO PURCHASE AGREEMENT WITH KENNETH A. KEENEY AND CATHERINE L. KEENEY FOR 0.254 ACRE, MORE OR LESS, (BEING IDENTIFIED AS COUNTY TAX MAP PARCEL 77.13-5-31) WHEREAS, by Resolution 071498-7, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County approved the Option to Purchase Agreement dated July 14, 1998, with Kenneth A. Keeney and Catherine L. Keeney for an option to purchase 0.254 acre, more or less, being further shown on the Roanoke County land records as Tax Map Number 77.13-5-31 ("the Property"); and, WHEREAS, under the terms of said agreement, the purchase price for the Property is $125,000, and the option must be exercised on or before January 9, 1999; and, WHEREAS, the agreement provides for settlement within 60 days from the date of notice of exercise of the Option by the Board of Supervisors; and WHEREAS, the property is necessary for the construction of the proposed Home Depot commercial development project, and the funds are available in the Economic Development Public/Private Partnership account; and WHEREAS, section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs that the acquisition and conveyance of real estate interests be accomplished by ordinance; the first reading of this ordinance was held on September 22, 1998; the second reading was held on October 13, 1998. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: G:\COMMON\OCT13\KEENEY.ORD 1. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to exercise the option to purchase from Kenneth A. Keeney and Catherine L. Keeney following described real estate, to-wit: All that certain tract or parcel of land, together with any improvements thereon, rights incident thereto, and appurtenances thereunto belonging, situate in the Cave Spring Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, containing 0.254 acres, more or less, and more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point on the south side of Westmoreland Drive, which point of beginning is the common corner to Lots 1 and 4, Section 6 as shown on the map of Mount Vernon Heights, recorded in Plat Book 2, page 67, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court for the County of Roanoke, Virginia; thence leaving Mount Vernon Heights and along and with the west line of Lot 4, S. 10 deg. 03' W. 254.38 feet to a point; thence S. 72 deg. 32' E. 31.65 feet to a point; thence along and with a new division line through Lot 4, N. 15 deg. 48' 51" E. 247.99 feet to a point on the south side of Westmoreland Drive; thence along and with the south side of Westmoreland Drive, N. 68 deg. 11' W. 57.5 feet to the point of Beginning, and being the western portion of Lot 4, Section 6, of said Mount Vernon Heights Subdivision, and designated as New Lot 4-A as shown on plat of survey made by Jack G. Bess, CLS, dated January 3, 1991, recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 1335, page 1524. Said real estate being further shown and designated upon the Roanoke County land records as Tax Map Number 77.13-5-31, and having a street address of 3319 Westmoreland Drive, SW, Roanoke, Virginia. This being all of the same real estate acquired by the Grantor from the Cave Spring First Aid and Rescue Squad, Inc., by deed dated 1/4/91, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 1335, page 1522. 2. That the County Administrator Assistant or County Administrators are hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County in this matter as are necessary to accomplish the exercise of the option, all of which shall be approved as to form by the County Attorney. G:\CONII~ION\OCT13\KEENEY.ORD 2 ..- . ~1 3. That the Board appropriates the sum of $134,000 from the Economic Development Public/Private Partnership account for the acquisition of this real estate and related expense. 4. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. G:\COMMON\OCT13\KEENEY.ORD 3 jjlltlllililt111l1111I11Ilititlilllliilllllllill111111111ttill11t1tlltllillillllllll11111111~1ilillllllllll~l11111111111111111i111,(~J _ l - .S ~, - ©o = AGENDA ITEM NO. A ~~ ~S ~~ ~~ ~• ~. .~ ~~ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE ~' ITIZENS COMMENTS c - - ~ ._ - SUBJECT: ~~ ~. - - _. - ._. I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN .CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY~~ THE GUIDELINES LISTED c __ s BELOW: - c ® Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman- will -' decide the time Iimit based on the number of citizens speakin on an issue, _ and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority o~the Board to do otherwise. - ~ • _ • _ ® Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of ~ view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. s_ - s ® All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between arecognized =. speaker and audience members is not allowed. a. - e ®: ~ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ~. - _ ® ~ Speakers are requested to Ieave any written statements and/or comments ~_ with the clerk. s: ® INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON B.F.HALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP - SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. a ~.w a. .~ ~ mr ~~ ~~ ~~ .~ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK -- - - - ~. ... '- ,.. = - .s .. ... ,. - ._ _ ~ - - - - - - ~. -_ -. ~ - - - -' NAME __ - ,. ~ - ~.. - .... ~.. - = ADDRESS ~~~ C4 ~h~~,~-~~i ~ - - - . ._ / - PHONE ~ID ~S I ~ _ - _ - millill[lllllllillllllllllllllll(lllllfl111i111lllllllllllilill1111t1I1111111111111111111IIIIIIiillil[Illlilillil[11111111111111i'm ~ EtOANp,Y~ L ~' 9 Z ' ' G') ~ 2 a~ 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (540) 772-2004 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (540) 772-2193 October 14, 1998 Mr. R. Vincent Reynolds 4229 Toddsbury Drive Vinton, VA 24179 Dear Mr. Reynolds: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 806 L. JOHNSON, CHAIRMAN HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS, VICE-CHAIRMAN VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FENTON F. "SPIKE" HARRISON, JR. CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT JOSEPH MCNAMARA WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (540) 772-2005 The members of the Board of Supervisors wish to express their sincere appreciation for your previous service to the Grievance Panel. Citizens so responsive to the needs of their community and willing to give of themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce. am pleased to inform you that, at their meeting held on Tuesday, October 13, 1998, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to reappoint you as a member of the Grievance Panel for a three year term. Your new term began on September 10, 1998 and will expire on September 10, 2001. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, or appointed to any public body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act. Your copy is enclosed. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors MHA/bjh Enclosures cc: Joe Sgroi, Director, Human Resources P.O. BOX 29800 Intemet E-Mail Internet E-Mail ehodge@vwvw.co.roanoke.va.us ®Recycled Paper bos@www.co.roanoke.Va.us O~ pOAN kF ti' z c~ o a? 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (540) 772-2004 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (540) 772-2193 October 14, 1998 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BOB L. JOHNSON, CHAIRMAN HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS, VICE-CHAIRMAN VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FENTON F. "SPIKE" HARRISON, JR. CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT JOSEPH MCNAMARA WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (540) 772-2005 Rev. John Hartwig Good Shepherd Lutheran Church 1887 Electric Road, SW Roanoke VA 24018 Dear Reverend Hartwig: On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, I would like to thank you for offering the invocation at our meeting on Tuesday, October 13, 1998. We believe it is most important to ask for divine guidance at these meetings and the Board is very grateful for your contribution. Thank you again for sharing your time and your words with us. With kindest regards, ~~ C~~ix~#t~ o~ ~a~t~a~e Bob L. Johnson, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Internet E-Mall Internet E-Mail ehodgeQwww.co.roanoke.va.us ®Recycled Paper bospWww.co.roanoke.va.w LEGAL NOTICE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, October 13, 1998, in the Board Meeting Room at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive S. W. on the petition of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to rezone approximately 20 acres from R-1, R-2 and C-2 Conditional to C-2, General Commercial for the purpose of general retail and service uses (HOME DEPOT), located in the vicinity of Brambleton Avenue (Route 221) and Electric Road (Route 419), Cave Spring Magisterial District. A copy of the documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors, located at the Roanoke County Administration Center. Given under my hand this September 24, 1998. /~• Mary H. Allen, CMC, Clerk to the Board Roanoke County Board of Supervisors PLEASE PUBLISH IN THE ROANOKE TIMES ON Tuesday, September 29, 1998 Tuesday, October 6, 1998 Direct the bill for publication and affidavit to: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 ATTN: Mary H. Allen, Clerk to the Board CC: Paul Mahoney Tim Gubala Terry Harrington RKE Bl7ARD ,SUPERVISORS TEL~540-~~2-213 Sep 24''g8 1040 No . Rece i+~er Transmitter Date Time Mode Pages Result Transmit Confirma.±ion Report 003 RT-LEGAL RKE BOARD SUPERt,'ISORS Sep 24'98 1040 00'58 Norm 02 OK r C 0 V E R ~~ S H E E T Clerk to the Board To: Legal Advertising, The Roanoke Times Fax #: Subj: Attached Legal Ad Date: September 24, 1998 Pages: 2, including this cover sheet. CONIlV~NTS: Attached is a copy of a Legal Notice to be run on September 29 and October 6. Please call me at 772-2003 if you have any questions. From the desk of... Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board County of Roanoke P. 0. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 Phone: 540-772-2003 Fax:540-772-2193 LEGAL NOTICE ~ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The canoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to rezone approximately 20 acres from R-1, R-2 and C-2 conditional to C-2, General Commercial for the purpose of general retail and service uses, located in the vicinity of Brambleton Avenue (Route 221) and Electric Road (Route 419), Cave Spring Magisterial District. D~~ic t D~ ~~. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the ' , ~ 04 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. CI er k fo ~ va.r.l. Dated: July 30, 1998 Mary H. Allen, Clerk ~ ~^~ Please publish in the Roanoke Times Tuesday, f~, "t'996 Tuesday, , Direct the bill for publication to: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors PO Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (540) 772-2005 SEND ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION T0: ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS P.O. BOX 29800, ROANOKE, VA 24018 Terri West 540-981-3416 4540-981-3415 ~'il Sept. 28, 1998 '?`9:10 AM X1(2 DATE: Monday. September 28, 1998 TO: Mary H. Allen, Clerk to the Board ~ .................~......,......................................... FAX: 772-2193 FROM: Terri'JIlest 540-981-3416 PAGES: 2 Terri West 540-981-3416 'C 540-981-3415 ~i Sept. 28, 1998 '~ 9:10 AM C_?212 r~~ ~"s,ys The Roanoke Times Acct: ^''22Q03CULTIV Ph:?72-20G. P. O. ~ 9800 Name: CC~L'NTY OF R~:!AriOKE LE3AL NOTICE CIaSS Rate: DIS Rate: RDANOKE COUNFY p BW1RD Of 5UPERVISDRS Noiica is helaby given to all (~CedltStatUS: mtares[ed persons that the Roarake County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing ai 700 p.m. on Tuas - ROt1NOIiE ~'A =40I8 Paytype LL Rate LE Le~als Source ~ C1a5~4 In LB~,3IS Start 09129-'98 Issues 2 Rate Iss Words....... Lines........ Depth....... C'olumns...... Graphic..... St `~ OrdS. ® Bored Ad Copy Line LEGAL'.~ILYI'ICE I:OaN Sortfih•in~ ^ !~lanualSort TearSheets Reply Request day, Oceotwr 13, 19924, in [he Board Meatin2; Roan at the Rep: ~ 1 Roanoke County Administration Canter, 52U4 Bernard Drive ^ TFN S. W. on ilia petition of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to rezone approw- mately 2U acros Fran R-1. R-2 Stop j0~1~6,'98 and C-2 Conditional to C-2, , General Commercial fur [he purpose of general re[ai! end i~~ Price I~f?.~ s'3rvico uses (HOME DEPDT), located in the vicinity or Bram - ~I j 5~ DtSCOUnt l~•eeDay ~.,~(~ U bdetrm Avenue (Route 221; and Elsctrrc Road (Routs 419).. Cava Spring Magisterial Distnct. ~ het 1;j9 ~ A copy of the documents related tc this request may be ~~ St TeX Q,QI) examined in the office of the Clerk to the Board of Suparvr- 0 FedfaX Total QQ~ 13 S?,~}0 sas, located at tho Roarake CounryAdministratial Canter. Given ands my hand this Sap - tembar 24, 19923. Payment Q,UQ Mary H. Allan, CMC, Clerk [o the Beard '~pl) Cp'. Balance ~ f~O U.00 Roanoke County Beard of Supervises (s~s2s9) ProdurkCode P(~ # ^ Receipt ^ '47o~•able ^ OnHold ^ hill Ad Comments Reason for Discount Adid: 886299 Editions DC. ~ .. 1 To: pfr01/reb, Willy Howlett, pfr01/jrl, gup01/wjr, adm01/amg, ad Subject: October 13 Board meeting Date sent: Tue, 6 Oct 1998 08:58:45 We will again have all the people interested in the Home Depot rezoning request for the October 13 meeting at 7 p.m. So we need to repeat the steps we took for the September 22 meeting. FIRE AND POLICE We will need two police officers and two fire marshals to help with crowd control. They should be here about 6 to 6:15. GENERAL SERVICES We will need staff from General Services to set up the 4th floor trainng room after the work sessions for the overflow crowd. We will also need the TV set up in that room. There will be two work sessions in that room so they won't be much time to remove the tables and set up the chairs. We will also need staff to help with dinner because Brenda will be working with me downstairs and the overflow crowd upstairs. Also, we will need the communications guy to stay through the evening session. RVTV We will need RVTV staff to film the evening session. Anne Marie, please let Elaine know. CLERKS OFFICE We will make the signs and set everything up so the public knows what is going on. We will also provide dinner for all the staff that is staying. If you have questions, please let me know. Also let me know by email or phone who will be helping from Fire, Police and General Services. Thanks again for your help. ECH was very pleased with the way everything went last time, so hopefully, we will be successful again in keeping the peace. Mary Allen -- 1 -- Tue, 6 Oct 1998 08:58:46 / A Mary Allen -- 2 -- Tue, 6 Oct 1998 08:58:46 September 18, 1998 11:50 AM From' Lisa Ison Fax #: 345-3363 Page 2 of 2 September 18, 1998 lvls i~7ary Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors PO Bos 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Dear his Alien: This is an official request. to the Roan:,ke County Doard of Supervisors to appoint a representative to serve as Roanoke County's position. on the Board of Directors for. The Ne~v Century Venture Center. I would appreciatz the Board of Supen~isors officially appointing someone to fill this vacancy as soon as possible. Our next Board meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, September 22, at 7:30 ~,g here at the Center. Thank you for your assistance u~ this matter. Please givz mz a call if you havz aii~ questions. Sinoereh~, Lisa C'. Ison President September 18, ^998 11:5o Alt~1. From: Elsa lson Fax #: 345-3363 r ~ ~ ;• ,/ 1`` ` t --`J / r /';, Rel~ab~lity o fax ~ voice f~essaging Conuen~ence o Performance o Quaht~ Date: To: Company: Fax Phone #: CC: From: Subject: Friday, September 18, 1998 Mary Alien Roanoke County 772-2193 Lisa Ison Total # of Pages (including cover): Memo. Mary: 2 Page 1 of 2 est ~ ax; soy ~i < /~/ ~ ~'\ \ ~'~~'`~~ ~~, ~~ ~ i Time: 11:50 AM Here is official request for appt. to our Board. ~rigi~al is being mailed today. Thanks. Lisa If all pages were not received, please call back immediately: 344-6402 N T E R MEMO O F F I C E To: Board of Supervisors From: Mary H. Allen Subj: Appointment to the New Century Venture Center Board of Directors Date: September 25, 1998 County resident Owen Poole has served on the New Century Venture Center Board of Directors since it's inception. This was not a Board of Supervisors appointment when it was made in 1996. Mr. Poole has moved to Kingsport, Tennessee and the County position is vacant. Attached is a letter from the President of the New Century Venture Center requesting that the Board of Supervisors appoint an individual to serve on the Board of Directors. Since this is a new appointment by the Board, I thought I would let you know in advance that this will be placed on the October 13 agenda. If you have any questions or would like to know what type of individual should be appointed, please call Tim Gubala or me. CC: Elmer Hodge Tim Gubala ~Q ~, ~ p , .~0.6 Ja 1~ Aso ~ ,~c~.~y N~ ~e~~ Sp i ~~ ~cz.rr s o h From: "Elmer Hodge" <ADM01/ECH> To: adm01/bjh Date sent: Wed, 30 Sep 1998 08:52:30 +0000 Subject: (Fwd) New Century Venture Center Please prepare an agenda item for this appointment and recommend a citizen or Gardner Smith as a staff person. Thanks ------- Forwarded Message Follows ------- From: "Timothy Gubala" <ADM01/TWG> To: adm01 /mha Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1998 15:35:48 +0000 Subject: New Century Venture Center Cc: adm01/ech For the record, I recommend that the Board of Supervisors consider appointing a citizen with business experience to the Board of Directors of this group. The Economic Development staff is "spread pretty thin" right now. Elmer Hodge 772-2004 Brenda Holton -- 1 -- Wed, 30 Sep 1998 09:08:03 ~ r Q: .-, i;~ i~ 1.A • I N T E R MEMO 0 F f I C E To: Board of Supervisors From: Mary H. Allen Subj: Appointment to the New Century Venture Center Board of Directors Date: September 25, 1998 County resident Owen Poole has served on the New Century Venture Center Board of Directors since it's inception. This was not a Board of Supervisors appointment when it was made in 1996. Mr. Poole has moved to Kingsport, Tennessee and the County position is vacant. Attached is a letter from the President of the New Century Venture Center requesting that the Board of Supervisors appoint an individual to serve on the Board . of Directors. Since this is a new appointment by the Board, I thought I would let you know in advance that this will be placed on the October 13 agenda. If you have any questions or would like to know what type of individual should be appointed, please call Tim Gubala or me. CC: Elmer Hodge Tim Gubala • ~ ~ - „` ~;` ;.- ~~ September 18, 1998 Ms Mary Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors PO Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Dear Ms Allen: This is an official request to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to appoint a representative to serve as Roanoke County's position on the Board of Directors for The New Century Venture Center. I would appreciate the Board of Supervisors officially appointing someone to fill this vacancy as soon as possible. Our next Board meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, September 22, at 7:30 AM here at the Center. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Please give me a call if you have any questions. Sincerely, - ~~,. Lisa C. I on President 1354 Eighth Street, SW • Roanoke> YA 24015 • Phone: (540) 344-6402 • Fax: (540) 345-0262 • e-mail.' lisonC~rev. ner COMMITTEE VACANCIES BY MONTH. 1998 JANUARY SOUTHWEST DEVELOPMENT FINANCING, INC. The two year term of Tim Gubala will expire 01/12/98. FEBRUARY ELECTORAL BOARD (APPOINTED BY THE COURTS) The three year term of Wilton B. "Webb" Johnson will expire 02/28/98. GRIEVANCE PANEL The two year term of Kenneth W. Lussen will expire 02/23/98. The new term will be three years. ROANOKE REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION The four year term of Bob L. Johnson will expire 02/10/98. MARCH LEAGUE OF OLDER AMERICANS-ADVISORY COUNCIL The-one year term of Dee Pincock will expire 03/31/98. APRIL ROANOKE VALLEY GREENWAY COMMISSION The initial one year term of Richard Kelly will expire 04/06/s38. Subsequent terms are for three years. MAY TOTAL ACTION AGAINST POVERTY -ADVISORY COUNCIL The three year term of Elizabeth W. Stokes, designee of Bob L. Johnson, will expire 05/05/98. JUNE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS The five year term of Richard L. Jones, Jr., Catawba District, will expire 06/30/98. COMMUNITY POLICY AND MANAGEMENT TEAM The three year term of Rita J. Gliniecki, Parent Representative, will expire 06/30/98. Recommendation will be made by CPMT. FIFTH PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION The three year terms of Mrs. Pat Dean, Citizen Representative; and elected representatives Alfred C. Anderson and Fenton F. Harrison will expire 06/30/98. HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION SAFETY COMMISSION The four year term of Captain Charles R. Compton, Jr., State Police, will expire 06/30/98. The four year terms for a medical representative and youth representative are vacant. PARKS ~ RECREATION ADVISORY COMMISSION The three year terms of Bobby G. Semones, Vinton District; David A. Thompson, Hollins District; and Jack W. Griffith, Cave Spring District; will expire 06/30197. term. ) ROANOKE VALLEY REGIONAL CABLE TV COMMITTEE The three year term of James B. Dickey, Member at Large, will expire 06/13/98: VIRGINIA WESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE BOARD The four year term of Stanard F. "Stan" Lanford will expire 06/30/98. ~. ~..~ - JULY BUILDING CODE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS The four year term of Larry W. Degen, Alternate, will expire 07/28/98. AUGUST SOCIAL SERVICE ADVISORY BOARD The four yeas term of H. Odell Minnix, Board Liaison, will expire 08/01/98. SEPTEMBER GRIEVANCE PANEL The two year term of R. Vincent Reynolds will expire 09/10/98. The new term will be for three years. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY not appointed by Districtl The four year terms of J. Carson Quarles, Hollins District, and Ronald M. Martin, Windsor Hills District, will expire 09/26/98. OCTOBER GRIEVANCE PANEL The two year term of Raymond C. Denney, Alternate, will expire 10/10/98. The new term will be for three years. BUILDING CODE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS The four year term of Richard L. Williams, Consulting Engineer, will expire 10/24/98. NOVEMBER The two year term of Mary H. Allen will expire 11/21/98"~~~ DECEMBER BLUE RIDGE COMMUNITY SERVICES The three year terms of Bonnie Pollock, County Representative, and Reverend William L. Lee, Member at Large, will expire 12/31/98. The Member at Large appointment must be confirmed by the County, and Cities of Salem and Roanoke. BUILDING CODE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS The four year term of Wilmore T. Leffell, Building Contractor, will expire 12/12/98. LIBRARY BOARD The four year term of Nancy Greene, Cave Spring District, will expire 12/31/98. ROANOKE PLANNING COMMISSION The four year term of A. Kyle Robinson, Vinton District, will expire 12/31/98. ROANOKE VALLEY RESOURCE AUTHORITY The four year term of Diane D. Hyatt will expire 12/31/98. U:\W PDOCS\COMMITTE\BOOK\VAC-APP0.98 t.. 4 APPOINTMENTSNACANCIES TO BE FILLED FOR 1998 DISTRICT TERM EXPIRE BLUE RIDGE ALLIANCE FOR ORGAN AND TISSUE DONATION Mary Allen 2 yrs 11 /21 /98 BLUE RIDGE COMMUNITY SERVICES Reverend William L. Lee Member at Large 3 yrs 12/31/98 (Must be confirmed by Cities of Roanoke and Salem} Bonnie Pollock 3 yrs 12/31 /98 BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Richard L. Jones, Jr. Catawba 5 yrs 06/30/98 BUILDING CODE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS Richard L. Williams 4 yrs 10/24/98 (Consulting Engineer) Larry W. Degen, Alternate 4 yrs 07/28/98 Wilmore T. Leffell 4 yrs 12/12/98 (Building Contractor) COMM NITY POLICY AND MANAGEMENT TEAM Rita J. Gliniecki, Parent Representative 3 yrs 06/30/98 (Recommendation from CPMT) ELECTORAL BOARD (APPOINTED BY THE COURTS) Wilton B. "Webb" Johnson 3 yrs 02/28/98 FIFTH PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION `"' Elected Representatives Alfred C. Anderson 3 yrs 06/30/98 Fenton F. "Spike" Harrison, Jr. 3 yrs 06/30/98 Mrs. Pat Dean, Citizen Representative 3 yrs 06/30/98 GRIEVANCE PANEL Kenneth W. Lussen 3 yrs 02/23/98 R. Vincent Reynolds 3 yrs 09/10/98 Raymond C. Denney, Alternate 3 yrs 10/10/98 HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION SAFETY COMMISSION Capt Charles R. Compton, Jr., State Police 4 yrs 06/30/98 Vacant -.Medical Representative 4 yrs 06/30/98 Vacant -Youth Representatives 4 yrs 06/30/98 INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (not appointed by district) J. Carson Quarles Hollins 4 yrs 09/26/98 Ronald M. Martin Windsor Hills 4 yrs 09/26/98 LEAGUE OF OLDER AMERICANS-ADVISORY COUNCIL Mr. Dee Pincock 1 yr 03/31/98 LIBRARY BOARD Mrs. Nancy Greene Cave Spring 4 yrs 12/31 /98 PARKS & RECREATION ADVISORY COMMISSION Jack W. Griffith Cave Spring 3 yrs 06/30/98 David A. Thompson Hollins 3 yrs 06/30/98 Bobby G. Semones Vinton 3 yrs 06/30/98 ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION A. Kyle Robinson Vinton 4 yrs 12/31 /98 ROANOKE REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION Bob L. Johnson 4"~rs ~ 02/10/98 ROANOKE VALLEY GREENWAY COMMISSION Richard Kelly 3 yrs 04/08/98 ROANOKE VALLEY REGIONAL CABLE TV COMMITTEE James B. Dickey 3 yrs 06/13!98 ROANOKE VALLEY RESOURCE AUTHORITY Diane D. Hyatt 4 yrs 12/31/98 SOCIAL SERVICES ADVISORY BOARD H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix Board Liaison 4 yrs 08/01 /98 SOUTHWEST DEVELOPMENT FINANCING, INC. Timothy W. Gubala 2 yrs 01 /12/98 TOTAL ACTION AGAINST POVERTY BOARD OF DIRECTORS Bob L. Johnson, Elected Official Mrs. Elizabeth W. Stokes, Designee 2 yrs 05/05/98 VIRGINIA WESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE BOARD Stanard F. "Stan" Lanford 4 yrs 06/30/98 C:\OFFICE\WPWIN\WPDOCSICOMMITTE\BOOK~APPOINT.98 +~ _,~. _