Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/27/1998 - RegularAT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 27, 1998 ORDINANCE 102798-7 VACATING A 6-FOOT PORTION OF A 60-FOOT UNIMPROVED RIGHT-OF-WAY KNOWN AS THOMAS DRIVE, CREATED ON MAP OF SECTION NO. 3, CAMPBELL HILLS, PLAT BOOK 9, PAGE 179, AND FURTHER SHOWN ON RESUBDIVISION PLAT FOR THOMAS, LTD., PLAT BOOK 19, PAGE 176, IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, by subdivision plat entitled "MAP OF SECTION NO. 3, CAMPBELL HILLS" dated May 28, 1980, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Plat Book 9, page 179, the owner dedicated a 60-foot right- of-way known as Thomas Drive; and, WHEREAS, Thomas Drive is further shown on plat entitled "RESUBDIVISION FOR THOMAS, LTD.", recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 19, page 176; and, WHEREAS, the subject portion of Thomas Drive, along the southern property line of Lot 18-A (P.B. 19, pg. 176), formerly Lot 18 (P.B. 9, pg. 179), Section 3, Campbell Hills, is currently an unimproved right-of-way; and, WHEREAS, the Petitioner, Thomas, Ltd., is the developer of Campbell Hills subdivision and is the current owner of Lot 18-A and the remainder tract of land on the opposite side of Thomas Drive, designated on the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map No. 63.03-01-04; and, WHEREAS, as a result of a 5.2' encroachment of the house constructed on Lot 18- A into the 30-foot building setback line, the Petitioner has requested that a portion of Thomas Drive, 6 feet in width and extending along the southern property line of Lot 18-A, be vacated pursuant to §15.2-2272.2 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended); and, WHEREAS, in exchange, the Petitioner has agreed to dedicate additional right-of- way on the opposite side of Thomas Drive to maintain the right-of-way at the same width; and, WHEREAS, this vacation, subject to the conditions herein, will not involve any cost to the County and the affected County departments have raised no objection; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by §15.2-2204 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), and the first reading of this ordinance was held on October 13, 1998; the public hearing and second reading of this ordinance was held on October 27, 1998. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That a portion of Thomas Drive, 6' in width and extending along the southern boundary of Lot 18-A, being designated and shown as "0.040 ACRE BOUNDED BY CORNERS 3, 8, 9,10, 6, 5, 4 TO 3 INCLUSIVE BEING VACATED BY COUNTY OF ROANOKE" on Exhibit A attached hereto, said right-of-way having been dedicated on the subdivision plat entitled "Map of Section No. 3, Campbell Hills" dated May 28, 1980, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 9, page 179, and being further shown on plat entitled "Resubdivision For Thomas, Ltd.", recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 19, page 176, in the Catawba Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to Section 15.2-2272 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), subject to the following conditions: 2 a. That the section of Thomas Drive which is located within the area designated as'55 ft. radius temporary turnaround' shall be excepted from this vacation and shall continue to constitute a portion of the temporary turnaround until such time as Thomas Drive may be extended and the temporary turnaround may be vacated. b. That additional right-of-way, 6 feet in width, on the opposite side of Thomas Drive, being designated and shown as "0.065t ACRE BOUNDED BY CORNERS 11 THRU 17 TO 11 INCLUSIVE BEING DEDICATED TO COUNTY OF ROANOKE BY THOMAS, LTD." on Exhibit A attached hereto, be dedicated by subdivision plat as part of Thomas Drive. c. That the vacated portion of Thomas Drive is hereby reserved and retained as a public utility easement for a total easement width of 21' when added to the existing 15' public utility easement along Thomas Drive on Lot 18-A. d. That fee simple title to the vacated portion of Thomas Drive shall vest in the owner of the abutting property (Lot 18-A) as provided in §15.2-2274 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), subject to the above -described public utility easement and subject to the condition that the vacated area of land shall be added and combined, by deed or by plat, to said abutting property, in compliance with the Roanoke County Subdivision and Zoning Ordinances, and other applicable laws and regulations. e. That all costs and expenses associated herewith, including but not limited to publication, survey and recordation costs, shall be the responsibility of the Petitioner; and, 2. That the County Administrator, an Assistant County Administrator, or any County Subdivision Agent is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish the provisions of this ordinance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 3. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption, and a certified copy of this ordinance shall be recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in accordance with §15.2-2272.2 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended). 3 On motion of Supervisor Harrison to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson A COPY TESTE: 1"/4-101--- Brenda J. Holt n, CMC Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Terry Harrington, County Planner John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 4 NORTH i 0.065± ACRE BOUNDED BY CORNERS 11 THRU 17 TO 11 INCLUSIVE BEING DEDICATED TO COUNTY OF ROANOKE BY THOMAS, LTD. 55 FT. RADIUS TEMPORARY TURNAROUND PROPERTY OF THOMAS, LTD 4X # 63.03-01-04 B. 1569, PG. 697 15 e- %rQ covcrsd porch ?\ Eg•• oo .8, TOt"44F / 0.040 ACRE o/ BOUNDED BY CORNERS 3, 8, 9, 10, 6, 5, 4 TO 3 INCLUSIVE BEING VACATED BY COUNTY OF ROANOKE LOT 18 - A 1.160 ACRE HOUSE ENCROACHES 5.2' INTO MBL CCRC apron 171.36' S0110'34'E O SUTHERLAND CIRCLE 50' WIDE VA. SEC. RTE. #1192 " Jo, 1 C ROANOKE COUNTY VACATION OF 6—FOOT PORTION OF A 60—FOOT UNIMPROVED DEPARTMENT OF RIGHT—OF—WAY REFERRED TO AS THOMAS DRIVE, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 9, PAGE 179, LOCATED IN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 27, 1998 AGENDA ITEM: Request to vacate a 6-foot portion of a 60-foot unimproved right-of-way referred to as Thomas Drive, as recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 179, located in the Catawba Magisterial District. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ettre6#4`( EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Staff is recommending that the 6-foot portion of the unimproved right-of-way be vacated on the condition that an additional 6 foot portion of new right-of-way be dedicated so that the new right-of-way for Thomas Drive remains 60 feet in width. In addition, the existing 6-foot portion of right-of-way being vacated, will be retained as public utility easement. Once the portion of Thomas Drive right-of-way is vacated, this property will be combined with the adjacent property per the requirements of Title 15.2, Chapter 22, Code of Virginia, 1950 (as amended) as cited in Section 15.2-2272(2). BACKGROUND: The petitioner, Thomas, Ltd. is the owner of Lot 18-A and developer of Campbell Hills, Section 3 subdivision as recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 179 and located in the Catawba Magisterial District. The petitioner desires to vacate the 6-foot portion of the Thomas Drive right-of-way (unimproved), due to the encroachment of the house on Lot 18-A, constructed within the 30-foot front yard setback building line. Once the 6-foot portion of right- of-way has been vacated, the property will be added to Lot 18-A, thus providing the existing house with the required 30 feet of front yard setback from the new right-of- way. This vacation is being done as per the requirements of Title 15.2, Chapter 22, Code of Virginia, 1950 (as amended) as cited in Section 15.2-2272(2). 1 The petitioner has agreed to dedicate additional right-of-way and revise the construction plans so that the Thomas Drive right-of-way will remain 60 feet in width and will allow for the future extension of Thomas Drive (Route 1190), as shown on the attached map. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: County staff supports the proposed vacation of the 6-foot portion of right-of-way and dedication of additional right-of-way so that Thomas Drive will remain 60 feet in width and not affect the future extension of Thomas Drive (Route 1190). This vacation should be completed in accordance with Chapter 22, Code of Virginia, 1950 (as amended) as cited in Section 15.2-2272(2). A first reading was held on October 13, 1998 and a second reading of the proposed Ordinance and public hearing is scheduled for October 27, 1998. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: County staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the first reading of the ordinance to vacate the 6-foot portion of the referenced right-of-way and maintain the vacated area as a public utility easement. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: Arnold Covey, Director Elmer C. Hodge Department of Community Development County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved () Motion by: Denied () Harrison Received () Johnson Referred McNamara To Minnix Nickens No Yes Abs 2 NORTH 1/ 0.065± ACRE BOUNDED BY CORNERS660933 11 THRU 17 TO S4 O �8� 11 INCLUSIVE q< BEING DEDICATED TO COUNTY OF ROANOKE BY THOMAS, LTD. 55 FT. RADIUS TEMPORARY TURNAROUND PROPERTY OF THOMAS, LTD 4X # 63.03-01-04 i.B. 1569, PG. 697 15 N?¢S6 73S es' 4? E 0.040 ACRE BOUNDED BY CORNERS 3, 8, 9, 10, 6, 5, 4 y / TO 3 INCLUSIVE Cov� BEING VACATED BY COUNTY OF ROANOKE w o 0 w cD LOT 18 - A 1.160 ACRE r 0, • apron : % / /- /OB : covered s= %s a v r0 aoreh o° J0 Ate. :. O 171.36' S0110'34'•E O 'T. ,- SUTHERLAND CIRCLE s •.. 0 50' WIDE N .r �0 VA. SEC. RTE. #1192 o(,) N � HOUSE ENCROACHES 5.2' INTO MBL eons 1 1 L ROANOKE COUNTY VACATION OF 6-FOOT PORTION OF A 60-FOOT UNIMPROVED DEPARTMENT OF RIGHT-OF-WAY REFERRED TO AS THOMAS DRIVE, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 9, PAGE 179, LOCATED IN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 27, 1998 ORDINANCE VACATING A 6-FOOT PORTION OF A 60-FOOT UNIMPROVED RIGHT- OF-WAY KNOWN AS THOMAS DRIVE, CREATED ON MAP OF SECTION NO. 3, CAMPBELL HILLS, PLAT BOOK 9, PAGE 179, AND FURTHER SHOWN ON RESUBDIVISION PLAT FOR THOMAS, LTD., PLAT BOOK 19, PAGE 176, IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, by subdivision plat entitled "MAP OF SECTION NO. 3, CAMPBELL HILLS" dated May 28, 1980, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Plat Book 9, page 179, the owner dedicated a 60-foot right-of-way known as Thomas Drive; and, WHEREAS, Thomas Drive is further shown on plat entitled "RESUBDIVISION FOR THOMAS, LTD.", recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 19, page 176; and, WHEREAS, the subject portion of Thomas Drive, along the southern property line of Lot 18-A (P.B. 19, pg. 176), formerly Lot 18 (P.B. 9, pg. 179), Section 3, Campbell Hills, is currently an unimproved right-of- way; and, WHEREAS, the Petitioner, Thomas, Ltd., is the developer of Campbell Hills subdivision and is the current owner of Lot 18-A and the remainder tract of land on the opposite side of Thomas Drive, designated on the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map No. 63.03-01-04; and, WHEREAS, as a result of a 5.2' encroachment of the house constructed on Lot 18-A into the 30-foot building setback line, the Petitioner has requested that a portion of Thomas Drive, 6 feet in width and extending along the southern property line of Lot 18-A, be vacated pursuant to § 15.2-2272.2 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended); and, WHEREAS, in exchange, the Petitioner has agreed to dedicate additional right-of-way on the opposite side of Thomas Drive to maintain the right-of-way at the same width; and, WHEREAS, this vacation, subject to the conditions herein, will not involve any cost to the County and the affected County departments have raised no objection; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by §15.2-2204 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), and the first reading of this ordinance was held on October 13, 1998; the public hearing and second reading of this ordinance was held on October 27, 1998. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That a portion of Thomas Drive, 6' in width and extending along the southern boundary of Lot 18-A, being designated and shown as "0.040 ACRE BOUNDED BY CORNERS 3, 8, 9, 10, 6, 5, 4 TO 3 INCLUSIVE BEING VACATED BY COUNTY OF ROANOKE" on Exhibit A attached hereto, said right-of-way having been dedicated on the subdivision plat entitled "Map of Section No. 3, Campbell Hills" dated May 28, 1980, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 9, page 179, and being further shown on plat entitled "Resubdivision For Thomas, Ltd.", recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 19, page 176, in the Catawba Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to Section 15.2-2272 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), subject to the following conditions: a. That the section of Thomas Drive which is located within the area designated as'55 ft. radius temporary turnaround' shall be excepted from this vacation and shall continue to constitute a portion of the temporary turnaround until such time as Thomas Drive may be extended and the temporary turnaround may be vacated. b. That additional right-of-way, 6 feet in width, on the opposite side of Thomas Drive, being designated and shown as "0.065± ACRE BOUNDED BY CORNERS 11 THRU 17 TO 11 INCLUSIVE BEING DEDICATED TO COUNTY OF ROANOKE BY THOMAS, LTD." on Exhibit A attached hereto, be dedicated by subdivision plat as part of Thomas Drive. c. That the vacated portion of Thomas Drive is hereby reserved and retained as a public utility easement for a total easement width of 21' when added to the existing 15' public utility easement along Thomas Drive on Lot 18-A. d. That fee simple title to the vacated portion of Thomas Drive shall vest in the owner of the abutting property (Lot 18-A) as provided in § 15.2-2274 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), subject to the above -described public utility easement and subject to the condition that the vacated area of land shall be added and combined, by deed or by plat, to said abutting property, in compliance with the Roanoke County Subdivision and Zoning Ordinances, and other applicable laws and regulations. 2 e. That all costs and expenses associated herewith, including but not limited to publication, survey and recordation costs, shall be the responsibility of the Petitioner; and, 2. That the County Administrator, an Assistant County Administrator, or any County Subdivision Agent is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish the provisions of this ordinance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 3. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption, and a certified copy of this ordinance shall be recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in accordance with § 15.2-2272.2 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended). G:\ATTORNEY\VLH\AGENDA\THOMAS.ORD 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 27, 1998 ORDINANCE 102798-8 ENACTING SECTIONS 10-9.1, 10-9.2, 10-9.3 and 10-9.4 IN ARTICLE I OF CHAPTER 10 LICENSES OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO INCORPORATE AND CONFORM WITH RECENT LEGISLATION ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY REGARDING LIMITATION ON GROSS RECEIPTS FOR PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING, REAL ESTATE BROKERS, PROVIDERS OF FUNERAL SERVICES, AND STAFFING FIRMS FOR BUSINESS, PROFESSIONAL, AND OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE TAX PURPOSES WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority of Chapter 37 (Section 58.1-3700, et seq.) of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, the County of Roanoke, Virginia, imposes a business, professional, and occupational license (BPOL) tax through the adoption of an ordinance codified in Chapter 10 of the Roanoke County Code; and, WHEREAS, the 1998 General Assembly enacted §58.1-3732.3 to limit the gross receipts of providers of funeral services and §58.1-3732.4 to limit the gross receipts of staffing firms for BPOL tax purposes; and, WHEREAS, §58.1-3732.1 related to limitation on gross receipts for pari-mutuel wagering and §58.1-3732.2 related to limitation on gross receipts for real estate brokers are similar, previously existing provision of the state code; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors deems it appropriate, for informational, conformity and consistency purposes, to incorporate the cited state code provisions into Chapter 10 of the Roanoke County Code; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors finds that the adoption of these uniform provisions, by incorporation into the existing ordinance, will serve the public interest and will benefit the citizens and taxpayers of Roanoke County; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been published in a newspaper of general circulation within Roanoke County on October 13, 1998, and October 20, 1998; and, WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on October 13, 1998, and the second reading and public hearing was held on October 27, 1998. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Sections 10-9.1, 10-9.2, 10-9.3 and 10-9.4 in Chapter 10, LICENSES of the Roanoke County Code be enacted as follows: Chapter 10. LICENSES* ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL Sec. 10-9.1. Limitation on "gross receipts" - Pari-mutuel wagering. Gross receipts for license tax purposes under this chapter and under Chapter 37 (§58.1-3700 et seq.) of the Code of Virginia shall not include the license and admission taxes established under §§59.1-392 and 59.1-393 of the Code of Virginia, respectively, nor shall it include pari- mutuel wagering pools as established under §59.1-392 of the Code of Virginia. Sec. 10-9.2 Limitation on "gross receipts" - Real estate brokers. Gross receipts of real estate brokers for license tax purposes under this chapter and under Chapter 37 (§58.1- 3700 et seq.) of the Code of Virginia shall not include amounts received by any broker which arise from real estate sales transactions to the extent that such amounts are paid to a real estate agent as a commission on any real estate sales transaction and the agent is subject to the business license tax on such receipts. The broker claiming the exclusion shall identify on its license application each agent to whom the excluded receipts have been paid, and the jurisdiction in the Commonwealth of Virginia to which the agent is subject to business license taxes. Sec. 10-9.3 Limitation on "gross receipts" - Providers of funeral services. Gross receipts of providers of funeral services for license tax purposes under this chapter and under Chapter 37 (§58.1-3700 et seq.) of the Code of Virginia shall not include amounts collected by any provider of funeral services on behalf of, and paid to, another person providing goods or services in connection with a funeral. The exclusion provided by this section shall apply if the goods or services were contracted for by the provider of funeral services or his customer. A provider of funeral services claiming the exclusion shall identify on its license application each person to whom the excluded receipts have been paid and the amount of the excluded receipts paid by the provider of funeral services to such person. As used in this section, "provider of funeral services" means any person engaged in the funeral service profession, operating a funeral service establishment, or acting as a funeral director or embalmer. Sec. 10-9.4 Limitation on "gross receipts" - Staffing Firms. (a) Gross receipts for license tax purposes under this chapter and under Chapter 37 (§58.1-3700 et seq.) shall not include employee benefits paid by a staffing firm to, or for the benefit of, any contract employee for the period of time that the contract employee 2 is actually employed for the use of the client company pursuant to the terms of a PEO services contract or temporary help services contract. The taxable gross receipts of a staffing firm shall include any administrative fees received by such firm from a client company, whether on a fee -for -service basis or as a percentage of total receipts from the client company. (b) For the purpose of this section: "Client company" means a person, as defined in §1-13.19, that enters into a contract with a staffing form by which the staffing firm, for a fee, provides PEO services or temporary help services. "Contract employee" means an employee performing services under a PEO services contract or temporary help services contract. "Employee benefits" means wages, salaries, payroll taxes, payroll deductions, workers' compensation costs, benefits, and similar expenses. "PEO services" or "professional employer organization services" means an arrangement whereby a staffing firm assumes employer responsibility for payroll, benefits, and other human resources functions with respect to employees of a client company with no restrictions or limitations on the duration of employment. "PEO services contract"means a contract pursuant to which a staffing firm provides PEO services for a client company. "Staffing firm" means a person, as defined in §1-13.19, that provides PEO services or temporary help services. "Temporary help services" means an arrangement whereby a staffing firm temporarily assigns employees to support or supplement a client company's workforce. "Temporary help services contract" means a contract pursuant to which a staffing firm provides temporary help services for a client company. 2. That the provisions contained in this ordinance shall be in effect on and from January 1, 1999. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson A COPY TESTE: aor, Brenda J. Holton, CMC Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors 3 4 • cc: File Vickie L. Huffman, Assistant County Attorney Circuit Court Roy B. Willett, Judge Clifford R. Weckstein, Judge Diane McQ. Strickland, Judge Richard C. Pattisall, Judge Robert P. Doherty, Jr., Judge Jonathan M. Apgar, Judge Steven A. McGraw, Clerk Juvenile Domestic Relations District Court Joseph M. Clarke, II, Judge Philip Trompeter, Judge John B. Ferguson, Judge Joseph P. Bounds, Judge Ruth P. Bates, Clerk Intake Counsellor General District Court George W. Harris, Judge William Broadhurst, Judge Vincent Lilley, Judge Julian H. Raney, Judge Jacqueline F. Ward Talevi, Judge Theresa A. Childress, Clerk Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Magistrates Sherri Krantz/Betty Perry Main Library Ray Lavinder, Police Chief Richard Burch, Chief of Fire & Rescue Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke 24016 Roanoke County Law Library, Singleton Osterhoudt Roanoke County Code Book Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance O. Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Terrance L. Harrington, County Planner Michael Lazzuri, Court Services William J. Rand, III, Director, General Services Thomas S. Haislip, Director, Parks & Recreation Elaine Carver, Director, Procurement John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue ACTION NO. ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: October 27, 1998 ORDINANCE ENACTING SECTIONS 10-9.1, 10-9.2, 10-9.3 and 10-9.4 IN ARTICLE I OF CHAPTER 10 LICENSES OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO INCORPORATE AND CONFORM WITH RECENT LEGISLATION ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY REGARDING LIMITATION ON GROSS RECEIPTS FOR PARI- MUTUEL WAGERING, REAL ESTATE BROKERS, PROVIDERS OF FUNERAL SERVICES, AND STAFFING FIRMS FOR BUSINESS, PROFESSIONAL, AND OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE TAX PURPOSES COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: i se4i1.44, EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This is the second reading and public hearing of the proposed ordinance to enact Sections 10- 9.1, 10-9.2, 10-9.3 and 10-9.4 in Article I of Chapter 10 LICENSES of the Roanoke County Code to incorporate recent legislation set forth in Sections 58.1-3732.3 and 58.1-3732.4, as well as the similar provisions in Sections 58.1-3732.1 and 58.1-3732.2, of the Code of Virginia. These statutes contain special provisions for limitations on gross receipts in determining business, professional and occupational license (BPOL) taxes due from the following specific businesses: pari-mutuel wagering, real estate brokers, providers of funeral services, and staffing firms. BACKGROUND: Chapter 37 (Section 58.1-3700, et seq.) of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, authorizes localities to adopt an ordinance imposing a BPOL tax. The County of Roanoke has adopted such an ordinance which is set forth in Chapter 10 LICENSES of the Roanoke County Code. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The state code definition of "gross receipts" for BPOL tax purposes, which is incorporated into the County Code, is "the whole entire, total receipts, without deduction." However, the 1998 General Assembly enacted §58.1-3732.3 to limit the gross receipts of providers of funeral services so as not to include amounts collected by any such provider "on behalf of, and paid to, another person providing goods or services in connection with a funeral, whether contracted for by the provider or by the customer. The General Assembly also enacted §58.1-3732.4 to limit the gross receipts of staffing firms to not include employee benefits paid by a staffing firm to, or for the benefit of, any contract employee for the period of time that said employee is actually employed for the use of the client company pursuant to the terms of a PEO services contract or temporary help services contract. 'Employee benefits' are defined as "wages, salaries, payroll taxes, payroll deductions, workers' compensation costs, benefits, and similar expenses." Although these state code provisions supersede any local authority and are mandatory, rather than discretionary, in the administration of the BPOL tax without adoption by the locality, County staff is recommending that these specific limitations be incorporated into the County Code. The similar provisions of §58.1-3732.1 related to limitation on gross receipts for pari-mutuel wagering and of §58.1-3732.2 related to limitation on gross receipts for real estate brokers have been in effect for a number of years, but have been included in the proposed ordinance for purposes of consistency. The proposed ordinance incorporates the specific provisions of the corresponding state code legislation and is to be effective as of January 1, 1999, to coincide with the County's license tax year of January 1 to December 31. FISCAL IMPACTS: The Commissioner of Revenue's Office estimates the possibility of a $40,000 annual reduction in revenue as a result of these mandatory State Code changes which will be applicable regardless of the Board's action on this ordinance. ALTERNATIVES: (1) Adopt the proposed ordinance enacting Sections 10-9.1, 10-9.2, 10-9.3 and 10-9.4 in Article I of Chapter 10 Licenses of the Roanoke County Code. (2) Decline to adopt the proposed ordinance, in which case the County BPOL tax will be administered pursuant to the state code provisions. 2 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: above. Staff recommends adoption of the proposed ordinance in accordance with Alternative #1 Respectfully submitted, Vicki L. uffman le - Assistant County Attorney ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: Denied ( ) Harrison Received ( ) Johnson Referred McNamara to Minnix Nickens G:WTTORNEY\VLH\BPOL\1998REV.RPT 3 No Yes Abs AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 27, 1998 ORDINANCE ENACTING SECTIONS 10-9.1, 10-9.2, 10-9.3 and 10-9.4 IN ARTICLE I OF CHAPTER 10 LICENSES OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO INCORPORATE AND CONFORM WITH RECENT LEGISLATION ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY REGARDING LIMITATION ON GRO S S RECEIPTS FOR PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING, REAL ESTATE BROKERS, PROVIDERS OF FUNERAL SERVICES, AND STAFFING FIRMS FOR BUSINESS, PROFESSIONAL, AND OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE TAX PURPOSES WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority of Chapter 37 (Section 58.1-3700, et seq.) of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, the County of Roanoke, Virginia, imposes a business, professional, and occupational license (BPOL) tax through the adoption of an ordinance codified in Chapter 10 of the Roanoke County Code; and, WHEREAS, the 1998 General Assembly enacted §58.1-3732.3 to limit the gross receipts of providers of funeral services and §58.1-3732.4 to limit the gross receipts of staffing firms for BPOL tax purposes; and, WHEREAS, §58.1-3732.1 related to limitation on gross receipts for pari-mutuel wagering and §58.1-3732.2 related to limitation on gross receipts for real estate brokers are similar, previously existing provision of the state code; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors deems it appropriate, for informational, conformity and consistency purposes, to incorporate the cited state code provisions into Chapter 10 of the Roanoke County Code; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors finds that the adoption of these uniform provisions, by incorporation into the existing ordinance, will serve the public interest and will benefit the citizens and taxpayers of Roanoke County; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been published in a newspaper of general circulation within Roanoke County on October 13, 1998, and October 20, 1998; and, WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on October 13, 1998, and the second reading and public hearing was held on October 27, 1998. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Sections 10-9.1, 10-9.2, 10-9.3 and 10-9.4 in Chapter 10, LICENSES of the Roanoke County Code be enacted as follows: Chapter 10. LICENSES* ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL **** Sec. 10-9.1. Limitation on "gross receipts" - Pari-mutuel wagering. Gross receipts for license tax purposes under this chapter and under Chapter 37 (§58.1-3700 et seq.) of the Code of Virginia shall not include the license and admission taxes established under §§59.1-392 and 59.1-393 of the Code of Virginia, respectively, nor shall it include pari-mutuel wagering pools as established under §59.1-392 of the Code of Virginia. Sec. 10-9.2 Limitation on "gross receipts" - Real estate brokers. Gross receipts of real estate brokers for license tax purposes under this chapter and under Chapter 37 (§58.1-3700 et seq.) of the Code of Virginia shall not include amounts received by any broker which arise from real estate sales transactions to the extent that such amounts are paid to a real estate agent as a commission on any real estate sales transaction and the agent is subject to the business license tax on such receipts. The broker claiming the exclusion shall identify on its license application each agent to whom the excluded receipts have been paid, and the jurisdiction in the Commonwealth of Virginia to which the agent is subject to business license taxes. Sec. 10-9.3 Limitation on "gross receipts" - Providers of funeral services. Gross receipts of providers of funeral services for license tax purposes under this chapter and under Chapter 37 (§58.1-3700 et seq.) of the Code of Virginia shall not include amounts collected by any provider of funeral services on behalf of, and paid to, another person providing goods or services in connection with a funeral. The exclusion provided by this section shall apply if the goods or services were contracted for by the provider of funeral services or his customer. A provider of funeral services claiming the exclusion shall identify on its license application each person to whom the excluded receipts have been paid and the amount of the excluded receipts paid by the provider of funeral services to such person. As used in this section, "provider of funeral services" means any person engaged in the funeral service profession, operating a funeral service establishment, or acting as a funeral director or embalmer. Sec. 10-9.4 Limitation on "gross receipts" - Staffing Firms. (a) Gross receipts for license tax purposes under this chapter and under Chapter 37 (§58.1-3700 et seq.) shall not include employee benefits paid by a staffing firm to, or for the 2 7i-z benefit of, any contract employee for the period of time that the contract employee is actually employed for the use of the client company pursuant to the terms of a PEO services contract or temporary help services contract. The taxable gross receipts of a staffing firm shall include any administrative fees received by such firm from a client company, whether on a fee -for -service basis or as a percentage of total receipts from the client company. (b) For the purpose of this section: "Client company" means a person, as defined in § 1-13.19, that enters into a contract with a staffing form by which the staffing firm, for a fee, provides PEO services or temporary help services. "Contract employee" means an employee performing services under a PEO services contract or temporary help services contract. "Employee benefits" means wages, salaries, payroll taxes, payroll deductions, workers' compensation costs, benefits, and similar expenses. "PEO services" or "professional employer organization services" means an arrangement whereby a staffing firm assumes employer responsibility for payroll, benefits, and other human resources functions with respect to employees of a client company with no restrictions or limitations on the duration of employment. "PEO services contract" means a contract pursuant to which a staffing firm provides PEO services for a client company. "Staffing firm" means a person, as defined in § 1-13.19, that provides PEO services or temporary help services. "Temporary help services" means an arrangement whereby a staffing firm temporarily assigns employees to support or supplement a client company's workforce. "Temporary help services contract" means a contract pursuant to which a staffing firm provides temporary help services for a client company. 2. That the provisions contained in this ordinance shall be in effect on and from January 1, 1999. G:\ATTORNEY\VLH\BPOL\ 1998REV.ORD 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 27, 1998 ORDINANCE 102798-9 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO UNITED STATES CELLULAR TO CONSTRUCT A 100 FOOT CELLULAR MONOPOLE TOWER AND SUPPORT BUILDING ON CATAWBA VALLEY DRIVE. 0.75 MILE WEST OF OAKEY-DOLON ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 8.04- 1-42), CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, United States Cellular has filed a petition to construct a 100 foot cellular monopole tower and support building located on Catawba Valley Drive, 0.75 mile west of Oakey-Dolon Road (Tax Map No. 8.04-1-42) in the Catawba Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on October 6, 1998; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on September 22, 1998; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on October 27, 1998. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to United States Cellular to construct a 100 foot cellular monopole tower and support building located on Catawba Valley Drive, 0.75 mile west of Oakey-Dolon Road (Tax Map No. 8.04-1-42) in the Catawba Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Compre- hensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.2-2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved with the following conditions: 1) The height of the tower structure, including any antenna attached to the 1 structure, shall be no more than 87' or 20' above the surrounding trees, whichever is higher. Only a monopole broadcasting tower design with 7' whip antennas shall be permitted. 2) The final site development plan shall generally conform with the "Concept Plan of Mason Cove Cellular Site" prepared by Engineering Concepts, Inc. in July of 1998. 3) No grading or clearing shall be done outside of the 100' X 100' leased lot except for what is necessary for the 12' access road at a 20% grade. 4) The tower structure, antenna, and all attached support hardware shall be a brown flat matted color so as to better blend into the landscape and reduce visibility and light reflection. In addition any other accessory structures and fencing shall be of a material and color that blends into the landscape, reducing visibility and light reflection. 5) No lighting shall be installed on the tower structure or equipment building except for security lighting not to exceed a height of 25 feet in height, except as may be required by the FAA or other governmental or regulatory agency. 6) The tower shall be structurally designed to carry sufficient loading, and the site shall have the potential to accommodate the additional equipment necessary for at least one other vendors/providers of communications services, in order to minimize the proliferation of towers in the vicinity of this site. In addition, by executing the special use permit requested, the applicant agrees to make the tower available for lease within the structural 2 capacity of the tower and at reasonable costs adequate to recover the capital, operating and maintenance costs of the tower location required for the additional capacity. 7) If the use of the tower structure for wireless communications is discontinued, the tower structure shall be dismantled and removed from the site within 30 days of notice by the County and the special use permit shall become void. 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Harrison to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson A COPY TESTE: &ti4.4U . I Brenda J. Hol n, CMC Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Terry Harrington, County Planner John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 3 PETITIONER: US CELLULAR CASE NUMBER: 28-9/98 Planning Commission Hearing Date: October 6, 1998 (continued from September) Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: October 27, 1998 A. REQUEST Petition of US Cellular to obtain a Special Use Permit to construct a 100 ft. cellular monopole tower and support building, located on Catawba Valley Drive, 0.75 mile west of Oakey-Dolon Rd, Catawba Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS Elizabeth Nichols, a neighbor, said she is concerned with damaging the trail behind her house. Also after the leaves are gone from the trees, the structure will be very visible. She stated that she is opposed to the tower's location at this site. Robert Egbert, a member of the Appalachian Trail, said he is opposed to the tower. He said that he walks the area and hikes the trail. This tower would be a scar on the mountain and will set a bad precedent. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Commission asked about the maximum height of the tower. Jack Ellinwood, representing the petitioner, responded as follows: representatives from the Appalachian Trail requested that any structures on the site are to be no more than 20 feet above the tree canopy with a maximum height of 90 feet; the canopy height is measured at 70 feet. D. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS 1) The height of the tower structure, including any antenna attached to the structure, shall be no more than 87' or 20' above the surrounding trees, whichever is higher. Only a monopole broadcasting tower design with 7' whip antennas shall be permitted. 2) The final site development plan shall generally conform with the "Concept Plan of Mason Cove Cellular Site" prepared by Engineering Concepts, Inc. in July of 1998. 3) No grading or clearing shall be done outside of the 100' X 100' leased lot except for what is necessary for the 12' access road at a 20% grade. 4) The tower structure, antenna, and all attached support hardware shall be a brown flat matted color so as to better blend into the landscape and reduce visibility and light reflection. In addition any other accessory structures and fencing shall be of a material and color that blends into the landscape, reducing visibility and light reflection. 5) No lighting shall be installed on the tower structure or equipment building except for security lighting not to exceed a height of 25 feet in height, except as may be required by the FAA or other governmental or regulatory agency. 2 6) The tower shall be structurally designed to carry sufficient loading, and the site shall have the potential to accommodate the additional equipment necessary for at least one other vendors/providers of communications services, in order to minimize the proliferation of towers in the vicinity of this site. In addition, by executing the special use permit requested, the applicant agrees to make the tower available for lease within the structural capacity of the tower and at reasonable costs adequate to recover the capital, operating and maintenance costs of the tower location required for the additional capacity. 7) If the use of the tower structure for wireless communications is discontinued, the tower structure shall be dismantled and removed from the site within 30 days of notice by the County and the special use permit shall become void. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Ms. Hooker said she thinks the applicant has gone to great lengths to mitigate any visual impacts on the Appalachain Trail but there is a need for a tower in this area. She moved to recommend approval of the petition with the recommended conditions. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Thomason, Hooker, Robinson, Ross, Witt NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report _ Other Terrance Harrgton, S,e retary Roanoke C my Planning Commission • • • MEMO To: Planning Commission From: Carol Rizzio Date: September 30, 1998 RE: Cell Tower site comments from the Department of Conservation and Recreation During staff review the Department of Conservation and Recreation was contacted for comments on the proposed cell tower site as it relates to the scenic byway Route 311. We have recently received those comments and they included additional comments in the areas of Natural Heritage and Soil and Water Conservation. Their comments generally coincide with the staff report in regards to the sites proximity to the scenic byway and soil and water conservation standards. All three areas are summarized below. Division of Natural Heritage - According to their information, two rare and endangered plant species, white-haired leatherflower (Clematis coactilis) and mountain sandwort (Minuartia groenlandica) "have been documented in the project vicinity and may occur at the project site if appropriate habitat is present." These species inhabit open limestone, sandstone and shale cliffs, outcrops and barrens. They recommended an inventory of the site. However, after talking with the Natural Heritage Inventory Manager, J. Christopher Ludwig, about specific site characteristics, he stated that it is unlikely that either species is present at the project site and a site inventory is not necessary. Division of Soil and Water Conservation - An erosion and sediment control plan must be approved and a stormwater management plan may be required. Division of Planning and Recreation Resources - Scenic road designations are intended to recognize and promote what is scenic in our communities. Development activities within the viewshed of a scenic roadway are not specifically precluded. It is the hope that localities and communities will maintain the area and be sensitive to the viewshed. If this is the only feasible site, they recommend screening the view of the tower from travelers along Route 311 and the Appalachian Trail. James S. Gilmore, III Governor la John Paul Woodley, Jr. Secretary of Natural Resources COMM • NWEALTH of VIRQINIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND RECREATION 203 Governor Street, Suite 326 TDD (804) 786-2121 Richmond, Virginia 22219-2010 (804) 786-2556 FAX (804) 3 71- 7 September 9, 1998 Ms. Carol Rizzio County of Roanoke Department of Engineering and Inspections P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018 David G. Brickley Director 2 fk Q I CD ��ID CD t r« 4:7i 4.1?°*~ in St Re: U. S. Cellular- Monopole Tower Construction in the Catawba/Masons Cove Area, Roanoke, Virginia Dear Ms. Rizzio. Comments are provided herein on the above referenced project. DIVISION OF NATURAL HERITAGE The Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR) has searched its Biological and Conservation Data System (BCD) for occurrences of natural heritage resources from the area outlined on the submitted map. Natural heritage resources are defined as the habitat of rare, threatened, or endangered plant and animal species, unique or exemplary natural communities, and significant geologic formations. According to the information currently in our files, Virginia white-haired leatherflower (Clematis coactilis, G2G3/S2S3/NFINS) and mountain sandwort (Minuartia groenlandica, G5/S 1/NF/NS) have been documented in the project vicinity and may occur at the project site if appropriate habitat is present. Virginia white-haired leatherflower and mountain sandwort inhabit open limestone, sandstone and shale cliffs, outcrops, and barrens. Due to the potential for this site to support additional populations of these natural heritage resources, DCR recommends an inventory of the study area. With the survey results we canmore accurately evaluate potential impacts to natural heritage resources and offer specific protection recommendations for minimizing impacts to the documented resources. DCR also recommends revegetatmg the project area with native species. DCR-Division of Natural Heritage biologists are qualified and available to conduct inventories for rare, threatened, and endangered- species. Please contact J. Christopher Ludwig, Natural Heritage Inventory Manager, at (804) 786-7951 to discuss arrangements for field work. Any absence of data may indicate that the project area has not been surveyed, rather than confirm that the area lacks additional natural heritage resources. New and updated information is continually added to BCD. Please contact DCR for an update on this natural heritage information if a significant amount of time passes before it is utilized. An Agency of the Natural Resources Secretariat 3 DIVISION OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION • • • If the project construction disturbs over 10,000 square feet of land the project is the responsibility of the owner under the jurisdiction of Roanoke County. An erosion and sediment control olan must be approved prior to any land disturbingactivity on site. Plan requirements and approva: should be requested ough Roanoke County. A separate stormwater management plan may also be required, dependent on local requirements. DIVISION OF PLANNING & RECREATION RESOURCES The scenic roads enabling legislation does not specifically preclude development activities within the viewshed of the roadway, the intent of the program is to recognize and promote scenic roads as ways of defining what is particularly attractive and scenic in our communities. The hope is that localities will protect the designated scenic byway by encouraging communities and new developments along the roadway, to maintain the area in an attractive manner to be sensitive to the viewshed and not to detract from its beauty. If your analysis indicates that the proposed location is the only one feasible from a communications standpoint, then screening the tower from view is the next best option. All efforts should be made to screen the tower from the view of persons driving on Route 311 or walking on the Appalachian Trail. Vegetative screening with conifers or other non -deciduous trees and shrubs isbest. The tower also should be painted a neutral color that will blend into the background. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this project. Sincerely, rsrw John R. Davy, Jr. Planning Bureau Manager /saw • • • Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation Definition of Abbreviations Used in Natural Heritage Resource Lists Natural Heritage Ranks The following ranks are used by the Virg'nia Department of Conservation and Recreation to set protection priorities for natural heritage resources. Natural Heritage Resources, or "NHR's," are rare plant and animal species, rare and exemplary natural communities, and significant geologic features. The primary criterion for ranking NHR's is the number of populations or occurrences, i.e. the number of known distinct localities. Also of great importance is the number of individuals in existence at each locality or, if a highly mobile organism (e.g., sea turtles, many birds, and butterflies), the total number of individuals. Other considerations may include the quality of the occurrences, the number of protected occurrences, and threats; however, the emphasis remains on the number of populations or occurrences so that ranks will be an index of known biological rarity. S1 Extremely rare and critically imperiled, with 5 or fewer occurrences or very few remaining individuals in Virginia; or because of some factor(s) making it especially vulnerable to extirpation in Virginia. S2 Very rare and imperiled, with 6 to 20 occurrences or few remaining individuals in Virginia; or because of some factor(s) making it vulnerable to extirpation in Virginia. S3 Rare to uncommon in Virginia with between 20 and 100 occurrences; may have fewer occurrences if found to be common or abundant at some of these locations; may be somewhat vulnerable to extirpation in Virginia. S4 Common and apparently secure, with more than 100 occurrences; may have fewer occurrences with numerous large populations. S5 Very common and demonstrably secure in Virginia. SH Historically known from Virginia, but not verified for an extended period, usually > 15 years. SUJ Status uncertain, often because of low search effort or cryptic nature of the element. SX Apparently extirpated from Virginia. S#B Breeding status of an animal within Virginia. S#N Non -breeding status within the state. Usually applied to winter resident species. Global ranks are similar, but refer to a species' rarity throughout its total range. Global ranks are denoted with a "G" followed by a character. Note that GA and GN are not used and GX means apparently extinct. A "Q" in a rank indicates that a taxonomic question conceming that species exists. Ranks for subspecies are denoted with a "T". The global and state ranks combined (e.g. G2/S1) give an instant grasp of a species' known rarity. These ranks should nor be interpreted as legal designations. Federal Legal Status The Division of Natural Heritage uses the standard abbreviations for Federal endangerment developed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Endangered Species and Habitat Conservation. LE - Listed Endangered - threatened with extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range LT - Listed Threatened - likely to become endangered in the foreseeable future PE - Proposed Endangered PT - Proposed Threatened E(S/A) - treat as endangered because of similarity of appearance T(S/A) - treat as threatened because of similarity of appearance C - Candidate - enough information is available to propose for listing, but listing is "precluded by other pending proposals of higher priority" State Legal Status The Division of Natural Heritage uses similar abbreviations for State endangerment. LE - Listed Endangered LT - Listed Threatened SC - Special Concern - animals that merit special concern according to VDGIF (not a regulatory category) For information on the laws pertaining to threatened or endangered species, contact: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for all FEDERALLY listed species Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Plant Protection Bureau for STATE listed plants and insects Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries for all other STATE listed animals VDCR-DN$ 12/97 /'? --3 STAFF REPORT • • PETITIONER: UNITED STATES CELLULAR CASE NUMBER: 28-9/98 PREPARED BY: CAROL RIZZIO DATE: AUGUST 15, 1998 PART I A. Executive Summary U.S. Cellular is proposing to install a new cellular communications tower on the south side of the Catawba Mountain near Route 311 in the Catawba magisterial District. It will be visible from the Masons Cove area and will have limited impact on the Appalachian Trail and the Route 311 Scenic Byway. If approved the height should be limited to not exceed 20' above the surrounding trees. B. Description This is a petition of United States Cellular requesting a special use permit to install a 90 foot cellular monopole facility on property located north of Rt. 890 (Carterdell Road) and south of Route 311 in the Catawba Magisterial district. The property, Tax Map Number 8.04-1-43 is owned by Mike Morgan and is zoned AG-3. The total Morgan property contains approximately 18.73 acres. The proposed facility would occupy a 100'X100' lease lot and have an easement for a 12' wide access road. C. Applicable Regulations Federal Regulations - In 1996 the federal government amended the laws that apply to the cellular telephone industry, including guidance on local zoning authority. The federal communications Act of 1996 preserved local zoning authority in the siting of broadcasting towers. However, Section 704 of the Act states that such local regulations "I) shall not unreasonably discriminate among providers of functionally equivalent services; and II) shall not prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the provision of personal wireless services." In adopting this language it was the legislative intent to "provide localities the flexibility to treat facilities that create different visual, aesthetic, or safety concerns differently to the extent permitted under generally applicable zoning requirements." The act also clearly maintains the FCC's jurisdiction over radio frequency emissions and any radio interference. Finally, the act requires substantial written evidence in a written record for any decision to approve or deny a cell site. Local Regulations - In the Ag-3, Agricultural/Rural Preserve District, a special use permit must be approved by the Board of Supervisors prior to the installation of a broadcasting tower. The exact height is to be established as a condition of the permit. Additional design standards address lighting, if required by FAA, notification of the FAA and local airport control tower, and setback requirements. Site plan approval, erosion and sediment control permit, a building permit, and a VDOT entrance permit shall be required. 2 • • • PART II A. Analysis of Existing Conditions Location - The site is located approximately half way up the southern side of the Catawba Mountain. The tower would be located 127' south of Route 311. Topography and Vegetation - The average slope on the site is approximately 45%, rock outcrops and some boulders are present. The site is forested mainly with deciduous trees. A few pines are dispersed throughout the site. Access - The site is accessible from Route 311 by turning on Oakey Dolin Road (Rt. 655). After about 1/4 of a mile state maintenance ends and Oakey Dolin becomes a gravel road. Approximately 200 yards from that point, Mountain Road, an old unimproved road bed, leads to within 200' of the site. Mountain Road gently climbs the side of the mountain and is roughly 8' wide. The surrounding trees form a canopy over the road bed. Access to Mountain Road is also possible from Bradshaw Road by way of Old Catawba Rd., Carterbell Rd., and Mountain Dr. (a gravel road). Drainage - The site currently drains to the south on a fairly steep grade. Surrounding Neighborhood - Rural residential areas comprise the surrounding areas to the south, east, and west. To the north the site is adjoined by the Route 311 corridor. The Appalachian National Scenic Trail Corridor is just beyond the Rt. 311 corridor. Cultural and Scenic Resources - There are three significant cultural/scenic resources in the vicinity of this proposed tower site. First, the Appalachian Trail, designated as a National Scenic Trail, runs adjacent to the site about 1/4 mile north. It is located on lands purchased by the National Park Service in order to protect the Trail. The federally owned land adjoins the north side of the Route 311 corridor. Second, Route 311 heading north from Hanging Rock to its intersection with Interstate 64 has been designated by the Virginia Department of Transportation as a Scenic Byway. This designation is awarded to highway corridors that by-pass major roads and offer the traveler a diversity of visual experiences including significant natural, historical and cultural resources. This designation is identified on Official State Highway maps as an encouragement for tourists to seek out these routes and to boost local pride and identity. Finally, a major portion of the Catawba Valley was determined eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places as a Rural Historic District in September of 1991. Although no further action has being taken to pursue official designation on the State or National Registers. The proposed site is located just outside of the area determined eligible. 3 • • • B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Use - The proposed use is for a cellular monopole facility. This cell tower would provide access to the Mason Cove area. The addition of this cell tower will improve service coverage for Roanoke County cellular customers. Site Layout/Architecture - The proposed tower site would occupy a 100' X 100' leased lot located on a 18.73 acre parcel. The site would include the 80' cellular monopole and a 12' X 20' equipment building. A chain link fence, 8' high topped with three strands of brab wire, would enclose a 70' X 70' area, housing the monopole and the equipment building. The proposed monopole is a 24" diameter steel pole, painted brown. The antenna will be two whip antennas no more than 10' in height. Other U.S. Cellular sites have used a cross bar to support the whip antennas. No lights will be located at the top of the pole. Access/Traffic Generation - Access to the site would be provided by Oakey Dolin Rd. off of route 311. Improvements made to an old road bed (Mountain Road), spurring off Oakey Dolin Rd., and approximately 300' of new road would provide direct access to the tower. Along the final 300 feet a 25' access easement would be acquired. A 12' road bed with a 20% maximum grade is proposed within the easement. The site would be unmanned and after construction, only generate traffic of a periodic nature to accomplish routine maintenance and general site upkeep. Fire & Rescue - This request must comply with section 30-73 Emergency Communication of the County Code. The owner shall be responsible to insure that this tower does not interfere with Roanoke County's Emergency Communication System. The request has no impact on current fire and rescue services. Utilities - Public water and sanitary sever are not currently available to this property. This request does not affect the existing public water and sanitary sewer system. Drainage - A Erosion and Sediment Control Plan will be required. Storm Water Management calculations will be needed to determine if a Storm Water Management facility is necessary. Screening & Buffering - No screening/buffering is required in the current zoning ordinance. Although considering the slope of the site, and its close proximity to the Appalachian Trail and the Rt. 311 corridor, certain measures should be taken to ensure the site blends in with the surrounding area as much as possible. Function and Visibility - Although difficult to determine the actual impact, staff believes that the tower will be visible from certain areas along the Appalachian Trail (see Appalachian Trail comments below), as well as from areas within Masons Cove including Bradshaw Road. Visibility from Rt. 311 should be minimal due to the steep slope down on the south side and existing vegetation. 4 Proposed Tower Visibility maps were prepared by the Fifth Planning District at tower heights of 80',100', and 120' each with a radius of 3 miles. The maps show general areas from which the tower would be visible, not taking into account local elevation variations, buildings, trees, or vegetation. Comparing these maps no change is evident between the different tower heights. In addition, US Cellular was asked to prepare coverage maps for tower heights of 80' and 100' in order to compare any coverage differences. From these maps both tower heights appear to adequately cover the same area, with only minor differences along the edges. An additional visibility factor will be dependant on the extent of site development necessary. Considering the steep slope of the site and its forested character, the site development practices can play a big role in the tower's visibility; particularly, the amount of grading and clearing necessary to install and house the tower, equipment building, and access road. Public Services - The establishment of a cellular monopole facility at this location will improve service coverage for Roanoke County cellular customers. The improvement in coverage will enhance the existing areas service providing County businesses and citizens with quality, long term signal reception. Appalachian Trail Comments - The Appalachian Trail was contacted by U.S. Cellular Corporation for the opportunity to comment on the proposal of a U.S. Cellular wireless telecommunications facility adjacent to Route 311 in Roanoke County. A summary of the comments provided by Andrew Hymen of the Appalachian Trail Conference follows. These comments were based on a perspective site within the same vicinity as the current proposal. (Initial site was approximately 800' to the west.) They stated that the Appalachian Trail near McAfee Knob is one of the highest used pieces of trail in Virginia. If the proposed facility protrudes significantly above the tree canopy, it will be visible from a quarter to half a mile section of the Appalachian Trial. This visibility is attributable to several factors: 1) thin forestation in the area 2) the Trail in this area crosses several open rock slabs 3) the opening in the forest canopy created by Route 311, and 4) the steep inclination of the Trail and the terrain. Therefore, for a tower in this vicinity they recommend a slender monopole facility which does not protrude more than 20 feet above the tree canopy (including antennas, lightning rods, et cetera). They made a recommendation of possible co - location on the "MATT -FUNK" 345 KV power line which crosses the Catawba Mountain below McAfee Knob. Another suggestion they had was to place the facility at the Appalachian Trail Parking Lot which would possibly present less visual impacts on the surrounding area. • 7-3 5 • • • C. CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The site is located in the Rural Preserve land use category. This land use area delineates outlying areas which are primarily undeveloped and stable. These rural regions require a high degree of protection to preserve agricultural, forestal, recreational, and remote rural residential areas. The policies that apply in this area do not address communications/broadcasting towers specifically. However, the policies are supportive of preserving the overall rural character of these areas. D. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD The submitted site development plan exceeds the minimum setback requirements for broadcasting towers. PART III STAFF CONCLUSIONS The proposed site, located on the side of a mountain as opposed to a ridge top, naturally reduces it's visibility. However, because of the site's steep slope and proximity to the Appalachian Trail and the Rt. 311 Scenic Byway, the proposal will in all likelihood have a visual impact on those scenic resources. It is staffs belief that the tower height should be the lowest height necessary to cover the specific area. Through an analysis of the maps provided by the Fifth Planning District and US Cellular, staff believes that an 80' tower with a 7' whip antenna will provide basically the same area of coverage as the 100' tower with the same antenna. This lower height also satisfies the recommendation of the Appalachian Trail Conference not to exceed 20' above existing trees. Should the Commission recommend approval, the following proffers should be considered: (1) The height of the tower structure, including any antenna attached to the structure, shall be no more than 87' or 20' above the surrounding trees, which ever is higher. Only a monopole broadcasting tower design with 7' whip antennas shall be permitted. The final site development plan shall generally conform with the "Concept Plan of Mason Cove Cellular Site" prepared by Engineering Concepts, Inc. in July of 1998. No grading or clearing shall be done outside of the 100' X 100' leased lot except for what is necessary for the 12' access road at a 20% grade. 6 (4) The tower structure, antenna, and all attached support hardware shall be a brown flat matted color so as to better blend into the landscape and reduce visibility and light reflection. In addition any other accessory structures and fencing shall be of a material and color that blends into the landscape, reducing visibility and light reflection. (5) No lighting shall be installed on the tower structure or equipment building except for security lighting not to exceed a height of 25 feet in height, except as may be required by the FAA or other governmental or regulatory agency. (6) The tower shall be structurally designed to carry sufficient loading, and the site have the potential to accommodate the additional equipment necessary for at least one other vendors/providers of communications services, in order to minimize the proliferation of towers in the vicinity of this site. In addition, by executing the special use permit requested, the applicant agrees to make the tower available for lease within the structural capacity of the tower and at reasonable costs adequate to recover the capital, operating and maintenance costs of the tower location required for the additional capacity. (7) • • If the use of the tower structure for wireless communications is discontinued, the tower structure shall be dismantled and removed from the site within 30 days of notice by the County and the special use permit shall become void. • ROANOKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT UNITED STATES CELLULAR SPECIAL USE PERMIT AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOI<E COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 27, 1998 ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO UNITED STATES CELLULAR TO CONSTRUCT A 100 FOOT CELLULAR MONOPOLE TOWER AND SUPPORT BUILDING ON CATAWBA VALLEY DRIVE. 0.75 MILE WEST OF OAKEY-DOLON ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 8.04-1-42), CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, United States Cellular has filed a petition to construct a 100 foot cellular monopole tower and support building located on Catawba Valley Drive, 0.75 mile west of Oakey-Dolon Road (Tax Map No. 8.04-1-42) in the Catawba Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on October 6, 1998; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on September 22, 1998; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on October 27, 1998. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to United States Cellular to construct a 100 foot cellular monopole tower and support building located on Catawba Valley Drive, 0.75 mile west of Oakey-Dolon Road (Tax Map No. 8.04-1-42) in the Catawba Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.2-2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved with the following conditions: 1) The height of the tower structure, including any antenna attached to the structure, shall be no more than 87' or 20' above the surrounding trees, whichever is higher. Only a monopole broadcasting tower design with 7' whip antennas shall be permitted. 2) The final site development plan shall generally conform with the "Concept Plan of Mason Cove Cellular Site" prepared by Engineering Concepts, Inc. in July of 1998. 3) No grading or clearing shall be done outside of the 100' X 100' leased lot except for what is necessary for the 12' access road at a 20% grade. 4) The tower structure, antenna, and all attached support hardware shall be a brown flat matted color so as to better blend into the landscape and reduce visibility and light reflection. In U:\W PDOCSWGENDA\ZONING\USCELLSUP 1 addition any other accessory structures and fencing shall be of a material and color that blends into the landscape, reducing visibility and light reflection. 5) No lighting shall be installed on the tower structure or equipment building except for security lighting not to exceed a height of 25 feet in height, except as may be required by the FAA or other governmental or regulatory agency. 6) The tower shall be structurally designed to carry sufficient loading, and the site shall have the potential to accommodate the additional equipment necessary for at least one other vendors/providers of communications services, in order to minimize the proliferation of towers in the vicinity of this site. In addition, by executing the special use permit requested, the applicant agrees to make the tower available for lease within the structural capacity of the tower and at reasonable costs adequate to recover the capital, operating and maintenance costs of the tower location required for the additional capacity. 7) If the use of the tower structure for wireless communications is discontinued, the tower structure shall be dismantled and removed from the site within 30 days of notice by the County and the special use permit shall become void. 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. U:\W PDOCSWGENDA\ZONING\USCELL. SUP 2 1 1 1 4 SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION FOR UNITED STATES CELLULAR 100' MONOPOLE SITE AT MASONS COVE ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA UNITED STATES ammo WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS PREPARED BY: ENGINEERING CONCEPTS, INC. JULY 24, 1998 PROJECT # 98090 ENGINEERING CONCEPTS, INC. 20 SOUTH ROANOKE STREET FINCASTLE, VIRGINIA 1 ■ ENGINEERING CONCEPTS INC. July 24, 1998 Planning Commission of Roanoke County, Virginia Attention: Mr. Terry Harrington Roanoke County Zoning Administrator 5204 Bernard Drive, SW Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Re: Special Use Permit Application United States Cellular 100-foot Monopole Cellular Tower Masons Cove — Catawba District Tax Number 8.04-1-42 Dear Mr. Harrington: Please accept this petition for a Special Use Permit allowing for the construction of a 100-foot cellular monopole tower and support building on the above referenced property. On behalf of United States Cellular we request that you place this application on the agenda for consideration at the September Planning Commission meeting. Engineering Concepts at the direction of U.S. Cellular has undertaken and enclosed all the necessary application data for your distribution and review. Also enclosed you will find a copy of the Concept Plan and visual aides that simulate the study area and visual impacts. U.S. Cellular notified the Appalachian Trail for their review of the subject site. Enclosed you will find a copies of the Appalachian Trail comment letter and FAA-2C Certification as required by the FAA. This site is below the required formal FAA review heights and distances as it relates to the Roanoke Regional Airport. Hopefully we have provided you with all the necessary data to facilitate Commission approval and Staff review. Should you have any questions or require any additional information, please call us directly. We look forward to the public hearing in September. Sincerely, Engineering Concepts, Inc. Jack D. Ellinwood Sr. Project Manager Cc: Doug Wilk — U.S. Cellular Joe Gonzales — Tristar Communications Tim Nash, LS —ECI Hal Bailey, PE — President - ECI P.O. Box 619 ■ 20 S. ROANOKE ST. • FINCASTLE, VIRGINIA 24090 ■ 540.473.1253 • FAX 473.1254 1 DESCRIPTION OF TAX PARCEL 8.04-1-42, PROPERTY OF MICHAEL A. MORGAN AS TAKEN FROM COMBINATION PLAT FOR BURRUSS TIMBER ASSOCIATES PART OF TRACT C, CATAWBA FOOTHILLS PREPARED BY FRED C. HOWELL, L.S., FEBRUARY 27, 1995 BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF U.S. ROUTE 311, CATAWBA VALLEY ROAD, CORNER TO TRACT B OF THE ABOVE REFERENCED PLAT THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY OF U.S. ROUTE 311, THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES: S 81°31'04" E 390.42 FEET TO A POINT; N 80°08'20" E 180.80 FEET TO A POINT; A CURVE TO THE LEFT, DELTA = 09°48'58", RADIUS = 445.24 FEET, ARC LENGTH = 76.28 FEET, CHORD = N 71°44'27" E 76.19 FEET TO A POINT; A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, DELTA = 11°20'42", RADIUS = 366.89 FEET, ARC LENGTH = 72.65 FEET, CHORD = N 72°30' 19" E 72.53 FEET TO A POINT; S 42°56'26" E 72.79 FEET TO A POINT; N 70°18'08" E 137.03 FEET TO A POINT; A CURVE TO THE LEFT, DELTA = 19°46'00", RADIUS = 480.73 FEET, ARC LENGTH = 165.85 FEET, CHORD = S 83°30'32" E 165.03 FEET TO A POINT; N 86°36'28" E 47.71 FEET TO A POINT; S 69°07'26" E 138.07 FEET TO A POINT; N 86°43'26" E 110.05 FEET TO A POINT; A CURVE TO THE LEFT, DELTA = 42°05'29", RADIUS = 421.97 FEET, ARC LENGTH = 309.99 FEET, CHORD = S 82°02'17" E 303.07 FEET TO A POINT AND BEING THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF NEW TRACT C-1; THENCE LEAVING SAID RIGHT OF WAY AND WITH THE LINE OF NEW TRACT C-1 S 17°03'44" W 555.16 FEET TO A POINT, CORNER TO ZACK L. BURSON; THENCE LEAVING SAID NEW TRACT C-1 AND WITH THE LINE OF ZACK L. BURSON, S 01 °02' 11" W 217.50 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY SIDE OF MOUNTAIN ROAD; THENCE LEAVING SAID LINE OF ZACK L. BURSON AND ALONG SAID MOUNTAIN ROAD THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES; N 88°57'49" W 96.33 FEET TO A POINT; N 73°36'44" W 257.43 FEET TO A POINT; N 55°09'08" W 205.40 FEET TO A POINT; N 75°28'08" W 99.25 FEET TO A POINT; N 56°41'08" W 179.99 FEET TO A POINT; N 67°08'08" W 247.15 FEET TO A POINT; N 80°09'08" W 213.45 FEET TO A POINT; N 58°49'08" W 237.67 FEET TO A POINT, CORNER TO NEW TRACT B; THENCE LEAVING SAID MOUNTAIN ROAD AND WITH THE LINE OF NEW TRACT B N 14°26'45"W 274.56 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 18.734 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. 1 1 COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 5204 Bernard Dr. P.O. Eox 29800 Roanoke, VA 24.013 ( 5L 0' 772-2063 FAX b 0 I 7 2-2103 Check type cf application filed (check all that apply): Q REZONING © SPECIAL USE ❑VARIANCE Applicant's name: Address: United States Cellular' 58 Dodge Hill Road Bennington, NH For stair" use only date received: application fee: placards issued: Case Number: Owner's name: Address: Mike Morgan 2732 Green Ridge Road Roanoke, VA Location of property: Tax Map Number: 8.04-1-42 received PC EZ � n�.i data: 3CS date: Phone: (603) Zip Code 45-4356 03442 Phone:(540) 562-0703 Zip Code: 24019 Magisterial District: Catawba Community Planning Area: Masons Cove Size cf parcel (s): 18.73 815,878 acres sq. ft. Existing Zoning: AG-3 Existing Land Use: Vacant Proposed Zoning: Remaining AG-3 Proposed Land Use: 100' Monopole Tower 100' x 100' Lease Lot & 12' wide access road. 11/2pr Staff Use Cruy I Use Type: I Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements cf the requested district: YES 7 NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FiFST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria fcr the requested Use Type? YES X NO IF NO, A VARIANCE iS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions beirf proffered with this request? YES NO • Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in orzer to: Is the application complete? Pease check if enclosed. A?PLICAT!CN WiLL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF Tr -;ESE ITEMS ARE MISSING CR INCOMPLETE. ors v MI Consultation v ( 13 1 /2" x 1 1 " concept plan I Application Y V<'"« Metes and bounds description Justification r, Water and sewer acclicatic l (_tio+ rebutted) / hereay certify that l am either the owner of the property or the am acting with the know/edge and consent or the owner. Ft!: V ws v Application fee Proffers, if applicable K%R Adjoining proper;( cwners r s ages r contract purchaser Owner's Signature: k-7. C�S1,u.�-,ra� — �,n,ri „� Q e i For Staff Use Only: Case Number 1 1 1 Applicant tL''Ir'l Ati'�i United States Cellular P• •r L .1SE• P5,4F •E •i• ce,. The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the feila:ling questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zonirsg district classification in the zoning ordinance. The establishment of a cellular monopole facility at this location will further the purpose of the Zoning Ordinance by improving service coverage for Roanoke County cellular customers. The improvement in coverage will enhance the existing area service providing County businesses and citizens with quality, long term signal reception. The small lease area required for the facility will minimize impacts on existing vegetation in return preserving view —sheds from the Appalachian Trail and surrounding properties. The completed facility will not affect approach slopes to regional airport facilities. The proposed 100' monopole is only 30 feet higher than surrounding trees. The proposed tower site is below the FAA permit review height of 200 feet and exceeds the approach slope minimums base on its horizontal position in relation to the Roanoke Regional Airport. (Refer to enclosed FAA-2C certification.) Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies oCntained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. The land use designation for the subject property as identified within the Comprehensive plan is Rural Preserve. The impact of the proposed cellular tower site on the existing terrain and vegetation will be minimal. The operation of the facility will require only periodic maintenance after construction and throughout the life of the facility. Disturbed areas will be less than typically required for residential dwellings. This use preserves much of the existing vegetation on the property. Please describe the impact(s) of the request en the propert' itself, the adjoining proper -ties, and the surrcuncing area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. This proposed tower facility will preserve the majority of existing vegetation on the property. Given the location of the monopole and it's proposed brown color visual impacts from surrounding properties and the Appalachian Trail will be minimal.. There will be no impact on schools, roads, water, sewer, parks or fire and rescue. This facility will generate traffic of a periodic nature to accomplish routine maintenance and general site upkeep. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • v:Xa; X: a,:f 4: s:;:;J•: A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the land use change, development, or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development of the property and_by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County permitting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may by altered to the extent permitted by zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on.the nature of the request. The County planning staff may exempt some of the items or suggest the addition of extra items, but in general, the following are considered minimum: ALL APPLICANTS Er. b mob. Applicant name and name of development. Date, scale, and north point of plan. c. Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions LJ d. Location, names of owners, and Roanoke Co. tax map numbers of adjoining properties. INI e. Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. �,/f. The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties. LJ g. All property lines and easements. Er h. All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights. Er i. Location, widths, and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to �/ the development. l j. Dimensions and location of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces. IAdc5tional information required for REZONING AND SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANTS u'/k. Show existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site. IVA Fidi I. Any driveways, entrance/exits, curb openings, and crossovers. [ I m Topography map on a suitable scale and contour intervals. fn. Approximate street grades and site distances at all intersections. / o. Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants. MA I gyp. Please submit any proffered conditions at the site and show how they are addressed. NM irr q. If project is to be phased, please show phase schedule. t(/4 I certify that all items required in the checklist above are complete. ature of applicant i 1 1 1 1 1 ROANOKE COUNTY SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION Adjoining Property Owner Information Rellis Myron & Tammy Elizabeth Palmer 3776 Oakley Dolin Rd. Salem, Virginia 24153 Tax Map # 8.04-1-17 Zack L. & Lillian D. Burson 3040 Golf Colony Dr. Salem, Virginia 24153 Tax Map # 8.04-1-18 David Quinn Eggleston, IV 3973 Carterdell Rd. Salem, Virginia 24153 Tax Map #8.04-1-33 David Quinn Eggleston, IV 3973 Carterdell Rd. Salem, Virginia 24153 Tax Map #8.04-1-32 David Quinn Eggleston, IV 3973 Carterdell Rd. Salem, Virginia 24153 Tax Map #8.04-1-34 Ellen Joy Campbell 4465 Old Catawba Rd. Salem, Virginia 24153 Tax Map #8.03-1-4.1 United States of America Washington D.C., 20240 (Federal Property — Appalachian Trail) Tax Map #8.00-1-43 ENGINEERING CONCEPTS INC. SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION FOR'FAA 2-C TOWER CENTER POSITION July 13, 1998 Site ID = Mason Cove Site Off Of Oakey-Dolin Road Route 655 Located near Salem, Roanoke County, Virginia I certify that the North Latitude of 37°22'55.778" and West Longitude of 080°04'29.529" are accurate to within +/- 0.3' horizontally, and that the tower site elevation of 1559.3' Above Mean Sea Level (AMSL) is accurate to within +/- 0.5' vertically as determined by static differential GPS measurements from published horizontal and vertical control monument(s). With a planned structure height of 100' Above Ground Level (AGL), the overall height would be 1659.3' AMSL. The horizontal datum (coordinates) are in terms of the North American Datum 1983 (NAD83) and are expressed in degrees, minutes, and seconds to at least the nearest hundredth of a second. The vertical datum (height) are in terms of the National Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD88) and are determined to the nearest 0.5' or better. Timothy S. Nas .S. License No. 1881 P.O. Box 619 ■ 20 S. ROANOKE ST. ■ FINCASTLE, VIRGINIA 24090 ■ 540.473.1253 • FAX 473.1254 • 1 1 IN nuM A. ~Mt NLOt I•aN POOL 103 aL rl. L07-3 -41 POI= POLL 1 131-72 MOW —1 tg} G•t".liIN11111..•7L:7C� 0Z' ialE-ram=i CRIMIN i! ' • amla i wanuacmaimrrakiiiw tom } a=si.1FAT_'a NOTES: 1. THIS SITE DOES NOT UE WTI} 2. MINIMUM SETBACK FROM PRO MINIMUM THIS SITE •• 110' air 7IIrP OMAOM PALM O® NO= 1P74 PPQ ILO tt LW-I_17 ON-1 47 VOL L0LLi11M 0. WOW I&O m O I OOOI ISM Mg taN NAP. 0.0/-1-10 EXISTING GRAVEL ROAD ENO STATE MAINTENANCE "+0 EX. OVERHEAD ELECTRIC ENGINEERING CON(4CEPT PLAN OF 20 S. ROANOKE ST., PO BOX 619OVE CELLULAR SITE FINCASTLE, VIRGINIA 24090 .S. CELLULAR 540.473.1253 FAX 540.473.125. E COUNTY, VIRGINIA 1..150" JULY 1998 PROJECT: 98090 of t i i I i i i i 1 l •20 S. ROANOKE ST., PO BOX 619 PINCASTLE, VIRGINIA 24090 540.473.1253 FAX: 540.473.1254 ENGINEERING CONCEPTS DATE: Jul, 1998 f ROAD CLASSIFICATION Light duty ... — Unimproved dirt route U. S. Route ( ) State Route MN ON 6° 107 MILS 0'14' 10 MILS AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 27, 1998 ORDINANCE 102798-10 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO DAVID & LUCY DOWNS TO OPERATE A BED AND BREAKFAST FROM AN EXISTING HOME AT 5209 CATAWBA VALLEY DRIVE (TAX MAP NO. 7.00-2-4.17), CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, David and Lucy Downs have filed a petition to operate a bed and breakfast from an existing home located at 5209 Catawba Valley Drive (Tax Map No. 7.00- 2-4.17) in the Catawba Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on October 6, 1998; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on September 22, 1998; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on October 27, 1998. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to David and Lucy Downs to operate a bed and breakfast from an existing home located at 5209 Catawba Valley Drive (Tax Map No. 7.00-2-4.17) in the Catawba Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.2-2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved with the following condition: (1) Signage will be limited to 3' x 4'. 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its 1 final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Harrison to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson A COPY TESTE: &e,aJ'A y64Q,b10)- Brenda J. Holtn, CMC Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Terry Harrington, County Planner John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA-8\OCT98WOWNS.SUP 2 ROANOIKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT David and Lucy Downs Special Use Permit 7.00-2-4.17 • PETITIONER: DAVID & LUCY DOWNS CASE NUMBER: 29-10/98 Planning Commission Hearing Date: October 6, 1998 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: October 27, 1998 A. REQUEST Petition of David & Lucy Downs to obtain a Special Use Permit to operate a bed and breakfast from an existing home, located at 5209 Catawba Valley Drive, Catawba Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Commission inquired about the amount of allowable signage. Staff stated that the applicant would be allowed approximately 40 square feet; however, the applicant has indicated a smaller sign. In response to the Commission, Mr. Downs stated that he proposes to cater to the casual hiker; someone who would like to bike or hike and have a dry place to stay and a hot meal in the morning. D. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS 1) Signage will be limited to 3' x 4'. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Ms. Hooker moved to recommend approval of the petition with the recommended condition. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Thomason, Hooker, Robinson, Ross, Witt NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report �� _ Other Terrance Hr'ringtor✓, Secretary Roanoke ounty Planning Commission • • STAFF REPORT Case Number: 29-10/98 Prepared by: Janet Scheid Applicant: David and Lucy Downs Date: October 6, 1998 PART I A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Petitioners request is compatible with the Rural Village land use designation and staff anticipates no negative impacts on the rural community. B. DESCRIPTION OF PETITION Petitioners are requesting a Special Use Permit to operate a Bed and Breakfast out of an existing single-family residential dwelling. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS 1. Bed and Breakfast is defined as, "A dwelling in which not more than five (5) bedrooms are provided for overnight guests for compensation, on daily or weekly basis, with or without meals." 2. Bed and Breakfast is allowed in the AR, Agricultural Residential District, with a Special Use Permit. 3. There are several Use and Design Standards that are applicable to the Bed and Breakfast use type. They are as follows: 1. The owner or owner's family shall reside on the premises. 2. Limited to five (5) guest sleeping rooms and a maximum number of guests not to exceed sixteen (16) . 3. Any new buildings built or existing buildings modified shall maintain the appearance of a single 1 • family residence. No rooms shall have direct entrance or exit to the outside with the exception of emergency exits when required by the Fire Marshall. 4. Guests may stay no more than thirty (30) consecutive nights in any one calendar year. 5. Meals shall be provided only to overnight guests. 6. Required parking shall be provided. 7. Health department approvals shall be submitted prior to issuance of a certificate of zoning compliance. 8. The site shall have direct access to a publicly owned street. 3. VDOT will require a commercial entrance permit. 4. Modified site plan review will be required. 5. The Building Code requires that if a dwelling is used for more than 5 guests, it must meet the Code for a boarding house. 2 • • PART II A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS 1. Lot Area - The site is approximately 4.35 acres. 2. Location - The site is located directly off of Route 311, Catawba Valley Drive just west of the intersection with Rt. 785, Blacksburg Road, in the Catawba Magisterial District. 3. Buildings/Structures - There is an existing 2-story single- family residential dwelling on the site. The house has an existing wrap -around deck on the rear and side of the house and an in -ground swimming pool. 4. Access - Access is directly from Rt. 311, a publicly owned and maintained street. B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 1. Use - The petitioners propose to retire to this house and operate a commercial bed and breakfast facility. At the current time there are only 3 bedrooms in the house so only two bedrooms will be used for bed and breakfast guests. In the future, petitioners may add one more bedroom. They plan to offer a deluxe continental breakfast to overnight guests. In addition, they anticipate making several modifications including installing a dishwasher, adding a shower stall to the half bath, adding a larger window and door to the lower level entrance, landscaping the front yard and improving the driveway and parking area. They plan to erect a small identifying sign towards the front of the property. 2. Access to Site - Access will continue to be directly from Rt. 311. 3. Circulation - The existing parking area will be improved and utilized for guest vehicles. It is approximately 30' by 30'. 4. Public Services - Public water and sewer are not available to this site. Health department approvals will be required prior 3 y to certificate of zoning compliance. 5. Signage - A maximum of one -quarter (0.25) square feet of sign is permitted for each linear foot of lot frontage. This site has approximately 170 feet of frontage. C. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This petition conforms with the Roanoke County Future Land Use Map and is designated Rural Village. The proposed use does not significantly alter the rural housing of the area and protects the rural lifestyle. PART III STAFF CONCLUSIONS Staff recommends approval of this petition. PREPARED BY: JANET SCHEID DATE PREPARED: October 1, 1998 • 4 • I V.'.1 ft .� COUNTY OF RO�,NOKE ZONING bat received." . ` received joy: -n ��f DEPT. OF PLANNING -AND r appl,cation fee: PCZA dare: B �"� av e 5204 Bernard Dr, eel fa! `�'�. " ;- i P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 placards issued: i) SCS dace -ram • (540' 772-2068 FAX (540) 772-21 08 i:lb Case Number. ^i • Check type of application filed (check all that apply): r"-c`t --'7c-c < 1 t '- REZONING IIIIR SPECIAL USE INVARIANCE� , ,� �(Lrar - i .)Y;, _ rc Applicant's name: v , ', O. \'.. --\ ''''-'-'1 - Phone: - Address: ;, - 19, �,, - `,'r A �:_ Zip Code: Owner's name: Y` ::^S r _ i-- t " - Phone: Address: --, i i -m-- : Zip Code: Location of property: +- V Tax Map Number: - (( , Magisterial District: (- , I (.r Community Planning Area: f ',LAf Size of parcel (s): ,f -="-s acres Existing Zoning: -` Existing Land Use: ,.A, v t -. _ sq.ft. aE1Y�it47 •''ci.ir` ���rfs ............................................ Proposed Zoning: ;r--; } . : , Proposed Land Use: ; , ,, :.:;, .,<:, i For Staff Use only Use Type: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES -- NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: f Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. R1s V Consultation Application Justification R15 V R/s v 8 1 /2" x 1 1' concept plan Application fee Metes and bounds description i4 Proffers, if applicable Water and sewer application 1 Adjoining property owners l hereby certify that I am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner. Owner's Signature: u � `_00--,,,_ -, • • Proposal Summary for 5209 Catawba Valley Drive �m ;W � De ete. a uq� (converting residence to "Bed & Breakfast") rtl� ` v p by Dave and Lucy Downs We are requesting a Special Use Permit with the intent of operating a Bed and Breakfast out of our home. We plan on moving to the residence within the next 12 months. The residence is situated slightly left of center, 190 feet from the road. The size of the lot is 4.3 acres. The concrete and cedar structure has 2 floors, 3 bedrooms and 2'-2 baths. A large deck offers a view of Catawba Mountain. Another feature of the home is a 16' by 32' in -ground pool. The front yard is a large grassy area. The gravel drive is on the left of the yard and ends in front of the 2 car, attached garage and 30' by 30' area for additional parking. Our intent is to offer 3 guest rooms and a deluxe continental breakfast (juice, fruit, cereal, fresh baked goods, hot beverage). To make the residence more amenable to a B&B we anticipate making several modifications including installing a dishwasher, adding a shower stall to the half bath, a larger window and door to the lower level entrance, landscaping the front yard, and improving the driveway and parking area. We will erect a small identifying sign on the front of the property. As finances permit we also hope to develop the main entry and add another guest living area. We hope that our establishment will be seen as a benefit to the community. The landscaping will enhance the appeal of the property, and we hope to draw guests who value the out-of-doors and will patronize the community businesses (i.e. general stores and restaurant). Our intent is to complement the 2 existing B&B's in the area and cooperate with them in every way. � 1 I` Gfi 1 • • • , 3 ci.,_c_lesa,„ 3 (' .,,-4-- ' • 4 , -5 „-' -.L--y-y--, \-, 1 ' QCk \ ; CA. sna 3 c:" / 7 o /r\ r‘r) 5+a}-e_ `••••••.1 • ROANOKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT David and Lucy Downs Special Use Permit 7.00-2-4.17 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 27, 1998 ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO DAVID & LUCY DOWNS TO OPERATE A BED AND BREAKFAST FROM AN EXISTING HOME AT 5209 CATAWBA VALLEY DRIVE (TAX MAP NO. 7.00-2-4.17), CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, David and Lucy Downs have filed a petition to operate a bed and breakfast from an existing home located at 5209 Catawba Valley Drive (Tax Map No. 7.00-2-4.17) in the Catawba Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on October 6, 1998; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on September 22, 1998; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on October 27, 1998. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to David and Lucy Downs to operate a bed and breakfast from an existing home located at 5209 Catawba Valley Drive (Tax Map No. 7.00- 2-4.17) in the Catawba Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.2-2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved with the following condition: (1) Signage will be limited to 3' x 4'. 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. U: \W P DOC S\AGENDA\ZO NI NG\DO W NS. S UP 1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 27, 1998 DENIAL OF ORDINANCE 102798-11 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO MARK HOUGH TO DEVELOP AND OPERATE A USED AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIP LOCATED IN THE 3100 BLOCK OF BRAMBLETON AVENUE (TAX MAP NO. 77.10-2-5), CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Mark Hough has filed a petition to develop and operate a used automobile dealership located in the 3100 block of Brambleton Avenue (Tax Map No. 77.10-2-5) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on October 6, 1998; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on September 22, 1998; and the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on October 27, 1998. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: On motion of Supervisor Minnix to DENY the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Minnix, Harrison, Nickens NAYS: Supervisor McNamara ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson A COPY TESTE: ote44-ek lc &M1- Brenda J. Holton, CMC Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Terry Harrington, County Planner John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney ROANOKE COUNTY .DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Mark Hough Special Use Per 77.10-2-5 PETITIONER: MARK HOUGH R CASE NUMBER: 30-10/98 Planning Commission Hearing Date: October 6, 1998 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: October 27, 1998 A. REQUEST Petition of Mark Hough to obtain a Special Use Permit to develop and operate a used automobile dealership, located in the 3100 block of Brambleton Avenue, Cave Spring Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS Rudy Cox spoke in support of the car lot; he noted that surrounding uses are all automobile related. Ellen Holtzman stated her opposition to the used car lot. She said the site will not accommodate a display of cars, customer and employee parking and a service area for detailing vehicles plus a sales office. Also, it is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Evelyn Krippendorf stated that she had made an offer to buy the property in order to preserve the area and a used car lot is not in character with the surrounding property. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Commission inquired about buffering requirements and uses permitted by right. Staff responded as follows: with the cut into the slope, replacement of trees and vegetation will be required; a new car dealership is allowed without a special use permit but a site plan review would be required. The Commission expressed concern that there are no topo plans and no elevation is provided. The applicant's architect responded to questions on building material, stormwater detention and parking area as follows: material will be of a decorative split face block; stormwater dentention will be underground and there is a storm drain in the street; all surface areas will be paved with no more than 30 to 35 vehicles at the site and no vehicles will be parked on the grass. D. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS 1) Signage on the site shall comply with all C-1 sign standards; 2) The display of portable signs shall be prohibited; 3) There shall be no vehicles missing major mechanical or body parts or having substantial damage maintained or stored on the site; 4) There shall be a 25-foot rear setback for the building; 5) All denuded embankments will be replanted or landscaped; and 6) The service bay doors will be oriented to the side. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Witt to recommend approval of the petition with the recommended conditions. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Thomason, Hooker, Robinson, Ross, Witt NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: Concept Plan _ Staff Repo Vicinity Map Ot er Terrance Ha ngto , : ecretary Roanoke C unty PI. nning Commission STAFF REPORT PETITIONER: Mark Hough CASE NUMBER: 30-10/98 A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PREPARED BY: John Murphy DATE: October 6, 1998 PART I This is a request for a Special Use Permit on a vacant, C-2 zoned property, in order to construct and operate a Used Automobile Dealership. The Brambleton Avenue Corridor is generally made up of commercial uses. The proposal includes a concrete block building of approximately 1200 square feet, containing office space and a detail/ service area for vehicles, as well as a display area for approximately 20 vehicles situated to the side and offset from the immediate front of the building. The site is designated Transition by the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. B. DESCRIPTION Petition of Mark Hough to request a Special Use Permit on a .753 acre parcel to construct and operate a Used Automobile Dealership in the 3100 block of Brambleton Avenue (Rt. 221), Cave Spring Magisterial District. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Used Automobile Dealerships are permitted in the C-2, General Commercial District, with a Special Use Permit. Use and Design Standards require outdoor display areas in conjunction with automobile sales to be constructed of the same materials required for off- street parking areas as required in Public Street and Parking Design Standards and Specifications. Additional requirements include a ten -foot planting strip adjacent to any public street right of way (including a large deciduous, large evergreen or small deciduous tree planted every 30 linear feet), the storage and/or display of motor vehicles in the planting strip required above shall be prohibited, the exterior display or storage of new or used automobile parts is prohibited, and any vehicle which is missing major mechanical or body parts or have been substantially damaged shall be placed in a storage yard. The storage shall be fully screened from public view and shall be set back at least one hundred (100) feet from any adjoining residential district. A commercial entrance permit will be required by VDOT. Site development plans will be reviewed and approved by County staff prior to the issuance of a building permit. • 2 • • PART II A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Location - The subject property is located on the south side of Brambleton Avenue, directly across from the intersection of Harris Street (Rt. 1621). The property is in the Cave Spring Planning Area and some urban services are available. TopographyNegetation - The site of the proposed project is flat approximately 50 feet deep beginning at the Brambleton Avenue right of way, and the rear of the site dramatically slopes uphill. The flat area is covered in grass with the rear slope heavily wooded with mature hardwoods and scrub deciduous vegetation. Surrounding Neighborhood - In addition to the subject C-2 zoned parcel, there are C-2 uses surrounding the site. To the east is a bread thrift store, to the west a garden shop and florist to the south, which is the rear of the site, is Brambleton Park, which contains a day spa, CPA and dentist offices. Immediately across Brambleton Avenue is an Avis Car Rental and Brambleton Alignment, both also zoned C-2. B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Layout/Architecture - The applicant's proposal includes one 1152 square foot concrete block building containing sales offices and an area for preparing the vehicles to be offered for sale. The concept plan indicates a paved surface for customer and employee parking immediately east of the building, with the service area on the west side of the building. The paved vehicle display area is roughly centered on the front of the lot and continues to the eastern side of the property. No details or conceptual drawings have been provided with the application related to the architectural design of the proposed building. TopographyNegetation- Based on the concept plan provided by the applicant and the newest topographic data available to staff, the impact on existing vegetation and slopes will be significant. The cuts into the slope and tree removal will be necessary in the rear vehicle display area and the area of the office building. With the cuts that may be required the use of retaining walls cannot be ruled out. Access/Traffic - The applicant's concept plan shows one access point on Brambleton Avenue (Rt. 221) between the building and the vehicle display area. The proposed entrance is aligned with the Harris Street (Rt. 1621) intersection of Brambleton Avenue. This section of Brambleton Avenue has a center turning lane shared for both directions of traffic. The Annual Average Daily Traffic Volume estimates by VDOT, based on 1995 studies, show a count of 23,000 vehicles. Fire & Rescue/Utilities - This site is primarily served by the Cave Spring Fire and Rescue Departments. Public water is currently available to the site and the Utility Department indicates public sewer can be made available to the site. Floodplain- This site is not within a FEMA floodplain. 3 • • C. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The subject property is designated Transition by the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. In Transition, retail uses are only described as desirable when clustered or within a planned shopping center. This category discourages general retail development and encourages office uses. The proposal is not consistent with Policy TR-1 (prevent commercial sprawl along major highways); another inconsistency is reflected in Policy TR-8 (the natural site features to be conserved as amenities to development). D. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The proposal will require the review and approval of site and building plans as well as erosion and sediment control and stormwater management plans. PART III A. STAFF CONCLUSIONS The proposed project is inconsistent with the Transition designation of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. Brambleton Avenue is one of the major road corridors and gateways into the County. The cuts into the bank and significant removal of existing vegetation would certainly have a negative visual impact on this gateway. The existing topography and vegetation are natural site features that should be maintained in order to preserve or enhance this major gateway. If the Commission recommends to grant approval, staff suggests the following conditions be considered: 1) There shall be a maximum limit of 20 vehicles on the property available for sale at one time; a request for the display of additional vehicles on the site shall require an the approval of an additional Special Use Permit; 2) Signage on the site shall comply with all C-1 sign standards but not limited to allowable square footage (0.5 square feet of signage per foot of road frontage), maximum sign height, and maximum number of signs; 3) The display of portable signs shall be prohibited; 4) The rear of the site shall be landscaped in accordance with the Type C Option 2 screening requirements (25 foot buffer yard, small evergreen trees with a minimum height of 5 feet at time of planting. These trees shall have a ultimate height of not less than fifteen (15) feet at maturity. One tree planted for each fifteen (15) linear feet of buffer yard. Required evergreen shrubs shall have a minimum height of eighteen (18) inches at the time of planting. These shrubs shall have a ultimate height of not Tess than six (6) feet at maturity. They shall be planted five (5) feet on center or less; 5) There shall be no vehicles missing major mechanical or body parts or having substantial damage maintained or stored on the site. • Owner's Signature: COUNTY OF ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 5204 Bernard Dr. P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 540' 772-20E8 FAX (-340) / i'2-21 0E.; For staff use only date ece IA rem d a0 IIc 'jon PClEZA .a:e. '2481iiisgt i—t,96- 14/9,1 Case ,"Jumper, Cheer type of application filled (check all that apply): LJ REZONING L.t SPPcIAL USEVARIANCE Applicant's name: Address: Owner's name: Address: Mark Hough c/o Budd, Amen & Company 505 S. Jefferson Street, Roanoke, VA A.T. Williams Company, Inc. P.O. Box 7287 Winston Salem NC Loca-icn of property: Perpendicular to the intersection of Harris Street and Brambleton Avenue Size of parcel (s): .7)1 acres 32,800 sti.ft. Tax Map Number: 77.10-2-5 Phone: 989-2320 Zip Cote: 24009 Phone: Zip Code: 27109-7287 N'iagisterial District. Cave Spring Magisterial Community Planning Area: Cave Spring Existing Zoning: C-2 Existing Land Use: Vacant REZrGP Proposed Zoning: Proposed Land Use: Used Automobile Dealership .,)... .'S P. C Use Does the parcel meet The minimum lot area, width, h e �- ac'ed .;ct �h, and frontage requirements of to r � oIS;,. ,. YES NO IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REOUIRED FIRST. Does the parce.1 meet tie minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning recuest, are conditions being proffered: with :his request? YES X NO NO Variance of Sec tl0n(s) of the Roanoke County Zoninc Ordinance in order to: Is the application, p ete? F; .,_ed. APPLICATION `'Vi NOT BE Ccm I EE C'IECK if =nCiCS ni l 1 LL T HEEE ITEMS ARE iMISSiNG OP, !NCOMPL_ , E. R:5 V Consultation Application Justlficaticn R.'9 V 8 1/2" x 1 i" concept plan Metes and bounds description PA Water and serer application I heresy certify that I am either the owner of the property am ac:rng with the knowiedge d content of t~caner. c• J ACCEPTED IP ANY R/5 V Xl l Application '__- ,-plicaticn fee 71:_ Frcfiers, if 'c colic.ble XL Adjoining property c4•:ners the owner's agent or contract purc.-aser and • • For Staff Use Only: Case Number ocr The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. The purpose of the ordinances set forth in the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance is to promote the health, safety and welfare of the public. We feel that the development of this site as a high end used automobile dealership will in no way adversely affect this objective. It will be keeping with the same kinds of commercial activity that currently operates in that area. There will be no significant increase in traffic, and we will follow all County regulations with regards to stormwater management. There are no natural water courses, historic buildings or landmarks on the site. The development will however, create employment opportunities and broaden the County's tax base. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke Count• Comprehensive Plan. The development lies within a transition district of the urban area land use plan. In this district, limited growth, consisting of single building office and retail, is encouraged. This development will be for the sale of high end automobiles with approximately 20 vehicles on display at any one time. We feel this development will work well as a buffer/transition between the higher intensity of the core district and the nearby neighborhood conservation district. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue. This development should have no adverse impacts on the adjoining properties or surrounding area. Public utilities will not be over burdened, and any increase in stormwater will be controlled through practices set forth by Roanoke County. There is one access proposed on Route 221 that will be located directly across the intersection of Harris Street. There are no sight distance concerns and a "right turn/left turn" lane in the center of Route 221. I 1 11 '1 NJDdN - urvnoo 3Hona'oa Si.dOcIVNI 2NlnO -7 rv'1d ld2ONOO • 1 • ROANOKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Mark Hough Special Use Pei(it 77.10-2-5 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 27, 1998 ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO MARK HOUGH TO DEVELOP AND OPERATE A USED AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIP LOCATED IN THE 3100 BLOCK OF BRAMBLETON AVENUE (TAX MAP NO. 77.10-2-5), CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DIS- TRICT WHEREAS, Mark Hough has filed a petition to develop and operate a used automobile dealership located in the 3100 block of Brambleton Avenue (Tax Map No. 77.10-2-5) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on October 6, 1998; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on September 22, 1998; and the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on October 27, 1998. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Mark Hough to develop and operate a used automobile dealership located in the 3100 block of Brambleton Avenue (Tax Map No. 77.10- 2-5) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.2-2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved with the following conditions: (1) Signage on the site shall comply with all C-1 sign standards. (2) The display of portable signs shall be prohibited. (3) There shall be no vehicles missing major mechanical or body parts or having substantial damage maintained or stored on the site. (4) There shall be a 25-foot rear setback for the building. (5) All denuded embankments will be replanted or landscaped. (6) The service bay doors will be oriented to the side. U:\W PDOCS\AGENDA\ZONING\HOUGH. SUP I 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. U:\W PDOCSWGENDA\ZONING\HOUGH.SUP 2 BIIIIIM11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111IIIIIIIIII,jU OM _ OM _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM N 1a 4 ) — i. _ APPEARANCE REQUEST Q - EMI PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTSUM SUBJECT: _ 'Q5LOD/-) - 111%. - I would like the Chairman of the Board of uervisors to recognize me during p g ring the _ INIO meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. ME WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS c FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: MOM • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakingon an issue,OM and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority oftheBoard to1111 1.11111 IMON do otherwise. — UM • Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized MOM speaker and audience members is not allowed. IM▪ M • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. 1111111 IMM ■ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments = with the clerk. _ • INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUPIl SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM " THE GROUinn P — ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. - - 111111 MEM - - _ _ - PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME ORME 11 MEM IZAo , co( _ ADDRESS 11�;s, PHONE Q — mlllillllllllllllllllilllllillllliilllllllillliliillilllllllilllllilllllillllllllllillllillllllilllllllilllllllililllllllllilllll li1111111111111111111111111111111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII111111111111111111111111111111111111111 I IIIIIIIII11111111111IIII1 Illilillll111 — AGENDA ITEM APPEARANCE REQUES I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment MOO whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakingon an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. - - OWEN UMW Una IMMIN V PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: : r?Cci4 L. AS.f /t ' 1,7' , /en J/� %�� rrl���� Afr/r ■ ■ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME eWc `i2V,f-seY4/ ADDRESS SSW / ,e,tr E ie2 5 CL/ PHONE 4d0 l (/4 , /a 4) - - - - - - SIM - MEI - - - - MOM - IWO - - - URN - Man - IMMO MEM - NMI SIM NUM - - - — — 1111 - - - MIN MIS - NMI - IMMO MENU Nino fi 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 j)I1a11111111111111111111.111.IU11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111I111111I111111111111111111111111111111111111111111i1.iji a ma _ a am ma AGENDA ITEM NO. (C-5 - _ - APPEARANCE REQUEST s _ _ /PLIc HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS _ _ - SUBJEC . C`' u-c,c 4747:1,1- ,31 �� 1 1, -)1 • f `` _ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY' THE GUIDELINES LIS'i'ED BELOW: Si Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman- will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, _ and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. _ ® Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. O All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. O Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ® Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. Mei MOW 0/10.11 IMMO NOM AIM MOM ANEW MOM MOM c PIN MEM - s e MEM s immit WNW OMER .o MOM ® INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME fiXi,.J /776'1j72/A Q^^� ADDRESS � S / I - 7 'j PHONE s 111111.1111 ISOM MEM MEM MOMS c NEM MINIM — NMI a MIMS OMNI 0 01/11010 �iiiiiiiliiiliiiii111111111I1111111111I1111111i11111111111I111111111111111111l1111111111I111111111111111111111111111111II111I1111� AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 27, 1998 ORDINANCE 102798-12 AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTIONS 30- 28, 30-29-7, AND 30-87-2 OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE TO ADOPT NEW STANDARDS PERTAINING TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF BROADCASTING TOWERS WITHIN ROANOKE COUNTY WHEREAS, the United States Congress adopted the Telecommunications Act of 1996 which imposed certain requirements on local governments with respect to zoning regulation of telecommunications facilities; and WHEREAS, in compliance with the Telecommunications Act of 1996 these ordinance amendments will provide Roanoke County with an effective basis to review the future tower applications, and will provide objective standards for the siting of new towers; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission for Roanoke County did hold its public hearing on this amendment on October 6, 1998, and made a recommendation concerning approval of the ordinance adopting these amendments to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia; and, WHEREAS, in the interest of public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice, the Board of Supervisors hereby amends certain provisions concerning broadcasting towers in the various zoning districts of the County; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law, and that the first reading of this ordinance was held on September 22, 1998; and the second reading and public hearing will be held on October 27, 1998. BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the Zoning Ordinance for Roanoke County, be, and hereby is, amended and reenacted, as follows: 1. That Sections 30-28, 30-29-7, and 30-87-2 be amended and reenacted as follows: Amend Section 30-28 Definitions as follows: Add the Following Definitions: Antenna Any exterior apparatus designed for telephonic, radio, or television communications through the sending and/or receiving of electromagnetic waves. Antenna types include, but are not limited to; omni-directional "whip" antenna, directional panel antenna, parabolic antenna and other ancillary antenna designs. An antenna does not include the broadcasting tower or other support structure to which it is attached. Stealth Design Any broadcasting tower that is designed so that all of its structural components including associated antennas are camouflaged, disguised or otherwise hidden for the purpose of making the tower and antennas unnoticeable to the casual observer, or otherwise unrecognizable as a broadcasting tower. Amend Section 30-29-7 Miscellaneous Use Types as follows: Delete: of deviees7--Exducted-afe-ameteuf-ratlie-tewers7whieh-etr&-eleseribeti-seperateir Add: Broadcasting Tower Any structure that is designed and constructed primarily for the purpose of supporting one or more antennas. The term includes but need not be limited to radio and television transmission towers, microwave towers, common -carrier towers, and cellular telephone and wireless communication towers. Broadcasting tower types include, but are not limited to 2 monopoles, lattice towers, wooden poles, and guyed towers. Excluded from this definition are amateur radio towers, which are described separately. Amend Section 30-87-2 Broadcasting Tower as follows: Delete: {A) Ccncral standards: {FCC) and the Fcdcrai , leeetted-at-a-ground-eletation-et-or-above-27000-feetraverage-mean-sea-levelr shall Add: 30-87-2 Broadcasting Tower A. Intent. The intent of these provisions is to regulate the placement of new and replacement broadcasting towers within Roanoke County. These provisions provide broadcasting tower applicants, property owners, and all other Roanoke County citizens clear guidance on the official policies and standards of the County. These policies and standards shall be used by applicants as a guide when selecting altemative broadcasting tower sites and broadcasting tower designs within the County. In addition, the County staff, Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors shall use these policies and standards, the Roanoke County Community Plan and the general Special Use Permit criteria found in Section 30-19 as a guide for evaluating any future requests for broadcasting towers. In the interest of preserving and enhancing the scenic and natural beauty of Roanoke County it is the goal of the County to achieve a long term reduction in the number of broadcasting towers within the County, and where possible, to achieve a reduction in the height of existing broadcasting towers throughout the County, with special emphasis on towers located along or near the ridgetops of major mountains and land forms. In addition, it is the goal of the County, where possible, to achieve the relocation of existing broadcasting towers and associated utility and access corridors which have a high visual impact on scenic resources.. To this end, the County will work cooperatively with broadcasting tower owners and applicants and land owners to achieve these goals. It is the official policy of the County to encourage and promote the co -location of antennas on existing public and private structures within the County. To achieve this end, the County encourages all wireless communication providers to locate new antennas on existing structures . Permits for new broadcasting towers should only be requested when no other reasonable alternative exists for locating needed antennas. 4 When new broadcasting towers are proposed as a last alternative, the requested broadcasting tower location, height and design should be chosen to protect and enhance the scenic and natural beauty of Roanoke County. Broadcasting tower locations at elevations lower than surrounding ridge lines are preferred. The use of stealth designs should be considered for any new broadcasting tower. It is the intent of the County to fully comply with all of the applicable provisions of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 and other applicable federal and state laws as said laws address and preserve Roanoke County's zoning authority and provide to the communication industry the right and responsibility to provide communication services within their service areas. B. Applicability: 1. These standards shall apply to all new and replacement broadcasting towers within Roanoke County with the exception that new and replacement broadcasting towers and associated antenna not exceeding thirty (30) feet in height and located within any commercial or industrial zoning district shall be permitted by right provided: a. The proposed tower is a monopole type design; and, b. The general area of the proposed tower is currently served by above ground utilities including electric power and telephone poles; and, c. All other use and design standards for the construction of the broadcasting tower and associated facilities are met. 2. No modification to increase the height, size, type or location of any existing broadcasting tower or associated facilities, excluding antennas, shall be made unless such modification results in the full compliance of the broadcasting tower and facilities with all of the requirements of this ordinance. 3. Antennas may be installed on any existing structure within the County, without the necessity of obtaining a special use permit, provided said antenna does not meet the definition of a broadcasting tower, does not increase the height of the existing structure more than ten (10) feet, and does not result in the structure and antenna exceeding the maximum structure height for that zoning district. 5 4. These provisions shall not apply to any temporary broadcasting tower erected for the purpose of system design or testing provided the temporary broadcasting tower is erected for a period not to exceed twenty-one days. In addition, in declared local emergency situations, the County Administrator shall be authorized to allow the temporary installation of a broadcasting tower for the duration of the local emergency. A zoning permit pursuant to Section 30-9 of this ordinance shall be applied for and approved prior to erecting any temporary or emergency tower. C. Application Requirements: 1. All potential applicants for broadcasting towers shall consult with County planning staff at least 30 days prior to submitting an application for a proposed broadcasting tower. During this consultation the applicant shall present information to the staff on system objectives, proposed coverage areas, and altemative sites considered and rejected. The staff shall provide the potential applicant information on Roanoke County policies and standards for broadcasting towers, and shall discuss with the applicant possible altematives to broadcasting tower construction. 2. In addition to the application requirements contained in Section 30-19-2 of this ordinance, all applicants for broadcasting towers shall provide the following at the time of application: a. The location of all other proposed broadcasting tower sites considered and rejected, and the specific technical, legal or other reasons for the rejection. b. The location of all other possible co -location sites considered and rejected, and the specific technical, legal or other reasons for the rejection. c. Accurate, to scale, photographic simulations showing the relationship of the proposed broadcasting tower and associated antenna to the surroundings. Photographic simulations shall also be prepared showing the relationship of any new or modified road, access or utility corridors constructed or modified to serve the proposed broadcasting tower site. The number of simulations and the perspectives from which they are prepared, shall be established with the staff at the consultation required in Section C.1. above. d. A computerized terrain analysis showing the visibility of the proposed broadcasting tower and antenna at the requested height and location. If new 6 or modified road, access or utility corridors are proposed, the terrain analysis shall also show the visibility of these new or modified features. e. Information on how the proposed site relates to the applicants existing communication system, including number of other sites within the Roanoke Valley, and the location of the antenna at each site f. All broadcasting tower applicants shall be required, at their expense to conduct an on -site "balloon" or comparable test prior to the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors hearings on the Special Use Permit. The purpose of this test shall be to demonstrate the potential visual impact of the proposed tower. The dates and periods of these tests shall be established with the applicant at the pre -application consultation. g. Written verification that all required submittals to the FAA as required by Section 30-87-2 D. 6 of this ordinance have been submitted. 3. The applicant shall be responsible for all fees associated with the filing of the application including the reasonable cost of any independent analysis deemed necessary by the County to verify the need for the new broadcasting tower. The Board of Supervisors shall establish these fees, which shall be discussed with the applicant at the pre -application conference. D. General Standards: 1. The maximum height of any proposed broadcasting tower and associated antenna shall be made as a condition of the special use permit, but in no case shall any broadcasting tower and antenna exceed 199 feet in height. Applicants shall request the lowest broadcasting tower and antenna height necessary to accomplish their specific communication objectives. 2. The setback for any proposed broadcasting tower shall, at a minimum, conform to the requirements for principal structures for the proposed zoning district. However, in no case shall the minimum setback from the base of the broadcasting tower to any residential structure on an adjoining lot be less than 40 percent of the height of the tower, measured from the closest structural member of the broadcasting tower (excluding guy lines). Guy lines shall be exempt from the minimum setback requirements in side and rear yards for the respective zoning district, but shall comply with the setback requirements for the front yard. 7 3. The minimum setback from any property line abutting a road right-of-way for any other building or structure associated with a broadcasting tower shall be fifty feet. Such buildings or structures shall be located a minimum of 25 feet from any other property line. 4. More than one broadcasting tower shall be permitted on a lot provided all applicable requirements have been met including setback requirements. 5. Broadcasting towers shall not be illuminated with any type of lighting apparatus, unless such lighting is a requirement of the FAA or FCC. When lighting is proposed to conform to federal requirement, the County shall contact the federal agency to verify the necessity of lighting, and to determine the minimal amount and type of lighting necessary to comply with federal guidelines. Security lighting, or a "down lighting" design may be installed on buildings and structures associated with a broadcasting tower. In no case shall any lighting violate Section 30-94 of this ordinance. 6. Any proposed broadcasting tower within two miles from any general or commercial airport or located at a ground elevation at or above two thousand feet, average mean sea level, shall be referred to the appropriate regional office of the FAA for review and comment prior to filing an application for a special use permit. 7. All broadcasting towers shall comply with any additional requirements established in the Airport Overlay District in Section 30-72 of this ordinance, and the emergency communications overlay district in Section 30-73. 8. Any broadcasting tower approved shall be structurally designed to carry sufficient loading, and the site approved shall be sized to accommodate the additional equipment necessary for at least three other vendors/providers of communications services in order to minimize the proliferation of new broadcasting towers in the vicinity of the requested site. In addition, by applying and being granted the special use permit, the applicant and the owner of the land agree to make the broadcasting tower and tower site available for additional leases within the structural capacity of the broadcasting tower and at reasonable costs adequate to recover the capital, operating and maintenance costs of the broadcasting tower location required for the additional capacity. 9. A monopole broadcasting tower design is recommended, The Board may approve an altemative broadcasting tower design if it finds that an altemative type of structure has less of a visual impact on the surrounding community and Roanoke County, and/or based upon accepted 8 technical and engineering data a monopole design is not technically feasible. Cost shall not be a criteria for determining broadcasting tower design. 10. No broadcasting towers shall be permitted within the critical viewsheds of the Blue Ridge Parkway or Appalachian Trail as shown on any official map designating these viewsheds and pre -approved by the Board of Supervisors. In addition, no towers shall be proposed within any other designated area of local scenic, historical, ecological and cultural importance as designated and approved by the Board of Supervisors prior to the filing of a tower application. 11. By applying and being granted the special use permit, the applicant and the owner of the land agree to dismantle and remove the broadcasting tower and associated facilities from the site within ninety days of the broadcasting tower no longer being use for wireless communications. Dismantling and removal from the site shall only be required after notice by the County. If antennas on any approved tower are relocated to a lower elevation, the tower shall be shortened to the height of the highest antenna. A bond or similar performance guarantee may be required as part of the special use permit approval. Said guarantee will be in an amount sufficient to ensure removal of the tower and all associated facilities and the reclamation of the property and road, access and utility corridors to a condition that existed prior to tower construction. 12. All broadcasting tower structures and associated hardware, antennas, and facilities shall be a flat matted finish so as to reduce visibility and light reflection unless otherwise required by the FCC or FAA. 13. No business signs shall be allowed on the property identifying the name of, or services offered by, any business associated with the broadcasting tower. E. General Review Policies All special use permit requests for new broadcasting towers, including the replacement or modification of existing broadcasting towers shall be reviewed by the staff, Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors on the basis of the following criteria: 1. The extent to which the broadcasting tower proposal conforms to the general special use permit criteria in Section 30-19 of this ordinance, and the intent, application requirements, and general standards for broadcasting towers found in these provisions. 9 2. The demonstrated willingness of the applicant to evaluate co -location opportunities within the proposed communication service area, and the demonstrated history of the applicant choosing co -location sites within the Roanoke Valley. 3. The base and top elevation of the proposed broadcasting tower relative to surrounding natural land forms. Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, broadcasting tower locations below surrounding ridge lines are preferred. 4. Broadcasting tower locations already served by existing roads and utilities are preferred due to the potential detrimental environmental and visual impacts resulting from the construction of new road and utility corridors. 5. Within the needed service area, the availability of other existing structures that are, based upon independent analysis, of suitable height, design, and location for the needed antenna. 6. The visibility of the broadcasting tower from the surrounding community and neighborhood compatibility of the tower as determined by the submitted computer simulations, terrain analysis and balloon or comparable test. 7. The degree to which the proposed tower location, site design and facilities including fencing, buildings and other ground mounted equipment and new or modified road, access or utility corridors are located, designed and constructed to be compatible with the neighborhood. 2. That this ordinance shall be effective from and after its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson A COPY TESTE: exp,a„ Att4, Brenda J. Holton, CMC Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors 10 cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, County Planner NOTE: copied on both sides Circuit Court Roy B. Willett, Judge Clifford R. Weckstein, Judge Diane McQ. Strickland, Judge Richard C. Pattisall, Judge Robert P. Doherty, Jr., Judge Jonathan M. Apgar, Judge Steven A. McGraw, Clerk Juvenile Domestic Relations District Court Joseph M. Clarke, II, Judge Philip Trompeter, Judge John B. Ferguson, Judge Joseph P. Bounds, Judge Ruth P. Bates, Clerk Intake Counsellor General District Court George W. Harris, Judge William Broadhurst, Judge Vincent Lilley, Judge Julian H. Raney, Judge Jacqueline F. Ward Talevi, Judge Theresa A. Childress, Clerk Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Magistrates Sherri Krantz/Betty Perry Main Library Ray Lavinder, Police Chief Richard Burch, Chief of Fire & Rescue Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke 24016 Roanoke County Law Library, Singleton Osterhoudt Roanoke County Code Book Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance O. Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Michael Lazzuri, Court Services William J. Rand, III, Director, General Services Thomas S. Haislip, Director, Parks & Recreation Elaine Carver, Director, Procurement John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue 11 ACTION NO. 1 ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 27, 1998 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance on a proposal of the Roanoke County Planning Commission to amend and re-enact Section 30-28, 30-29-7 and 30-87-2 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance to adopt new standards pertaining to the development of broadcasting towers within Roanoke County. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: ems.-••.n--.0( Attached is the final draft of the proposed changes to our zoning regulations pertaining to Broadcasting Towers. This draft was approved by the Planning Commission after holding a public hearing on October 6, 1998. The draft reflects the work of the citizen's committee that drafted the original changes, and the suggestions of the Commission. The proposed changes can be classified into three major categories. First, the ordinance contains a series of policy statements and statements of intent that clearly lay out Roanoke County's objectives regarding the siting of towers and the provision of wireless communication services. Second, significant changes have been made to the current application process (and application materials required). If adopted, increased information will be required with an application so that the staff, Commission, Board, and general community can fairly evaluate a specific proposal. Third, the ordinance contains an enhanced set of general standards and review policies that are tied back to the policy statements and application process materials. 2 These ordinance changes will give Roanoke County an effective basis to review future tower requests. In addition, the adopted changes will serve as a clear guide for future applicants clearly outlining Roanoke County objectives and standards for the siting of new towers. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: Approval of the Planning Commission's recommendation and the adoption of the zoning ordinance changes. Respectfully Submitted, Terrance L. Harrijton, AICP Approved, Elmer C. Hodge Department of Community Development County Administrator Vote No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by Harrison Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) McNamara Referred Minnix to Nickens Action PETITIONER: Roanoke County Planning Commission CASE NUMBER: 32-10/98 Planning Commission Hearing Date: October 6, 1998 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: October 27, 1998 A. REQUEST Proposal to Amend Sections 30-28, 30-29-7, and 30-87-2 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance Pertaining to Policies and Standards for Broadcasting Towers. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION Ms. Hooker suggested the addition of a definition for "stealth". E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Martha Hooker moved approval of the proposed changes to Sections 30-28, 30-29, and 30-87-2, with the addition of a definition of "stealth". AYES: Hooker, Ross, Thomason, Witt, Robinson NAYS: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report _ Other Terrance Harrington, retary Roanoke County Planning Commission 1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 27, 1998 ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTIONS 30-28, 30-29-7, AND 30-87-2 OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE TO ADOPT NEW STANDARDS PERTAINING TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF BROADCASTING TOWERS WITHIN ROANOKE COUNTY WHEREAS, the United States Congress adopted the Telecommunications Act of 1996 which imposed certain requirements on local governments with respect to zoning regulation of telecommunications facilities; and WHEREAS, in compliance with the Telecommunications Act of 1996 these ordinance amendments will provide Roanoke County with an effective basis to review the future tower applications, and will provide objective standards for the siting of new towers; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission for Roanoke County did hold its public hearing on this amendment on October 6, 1998, and made a recommendation concerning approval of the ordinance adopting these amendments to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia; and, WHEREAS, in the interest of public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice, the Board of Supervisors hereby amends certain provisions concerning broadcasting towers in the various zoning districts of the County; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law, and that the first reading of this ordinance was held on September 22, 1998; and the second reading and public hearing will be held on October 27, 1998. BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the Zoning Ordinance for Roanoke County, be, and hereby is, amended and reenacted, as follows: 1. That Sections 30-28, 30-29-7, and 30-87-2 be amended and reenacted as follows: U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\CODE\BROADCAS.TOW 2 Amend Section 30-28 Definitions as follows: Add the Following Definitions: Antenna Any exterior apparatus designed for telephonic, radio, or television communications through the sending and/or receiving of electromagnetic waves. Antenna types include, but are not limited to; omni-directional "whip" antenna, directional panel antenna, parabolic antenna and other ancillary antenna designs. An antenna does not include the broadcasting tower or other support structure to which it is attached. Stealth Design Any broadcasting tower that is designed so that all of its structural components including associated antennas are camouflaged, disguised or otherwise hidden for the purpose of making the tower and antennas unnoticeable to the casual observer, or otherwise unrecognizable as a broadcasting tower. Amend Section 30-29-7 Miscellaneous Use Types as follows: Delete: DROADCADTRG TOWER A 631141V1141V V11 ..111V11 4411 4L111V11114L 4,1 11011 10 111J14111Vd fat 111V �1441101111J 01V11, L1 V44 V441.1t1115 Vl VVA.,/ V 1115 Vf 144111V, 1V1V Y .4 1V11, 1114 , Vl 1111V1 V V14L Y V J, GL111 J 1{.11 1j'j.IVJ 4,f 1..:, .,J. 1r�41441V3 141 V 4411141tV441 14A11V 1V ♦1 Vl0 ♦Y 111VI1 441 V 1V61V11LV1 1../Vy441441V1, . Add: Broadcasting Tower Any structure that is designed and constructed primarily for the purpose of supporting one or more antennas. The term includes but need not be limited to radio and television U:\W PDOCS\AGENDA\CODE\BROADCAS. TOW 3 transmission towers, microwave towers, common -carrier towers, and cellular telephone and wireless communication towers. Broadcasting tower types include, but are not limited to monopoles, lattice towers, wooden poles, and guyed towers. Excluded from this definition are amateur radio towers, which are described separately. Amend Section 30-87-2 Broadcasting Tower as follows: Delete: . 30 07 2 D. e&J1 t:..b T,l.... (A) V11V1M1 J1M111M11J. 1. Th. 1V.. VI J11M11 L....1. GL VV111111V11 lJf 111V 1l1.0V14.41 uJV tlV 2. Th. Mlll JVILMVI.1VyMllV111V111 flVlll the LGLJV Vf t11V 1V..Vl lV Mll� LVJ11VllllMl J Il MVll11V Vll tLll M1; Vlll.11b lVl J11M11 LV ...t 1VMJl l. 40�,V1V�.1�b1111! Vf Q1V �V .. Vl, 111VMJ MlV1 f1V111 111V V1V J./J! Jl1 MV1M1Ml 111V111L VL Vf 111V IV .. Vl (VA1Vll.11illl1b b"J 1111VJ). CJM, 1111VJ J11M11 LV VllVlllr/! �Vlll 111V lllllllllllull JVlLMV111V�M11 V111VlllJ 111 J11V —i 1 VMl , M11J fVl t11V 1VJflVVt1. V L..Vlllllb 11J111Vt, La J11M11 VV1111,/l, . . 1111 tlns JVILMVI\ iVl�MllV111V111J fVl 111V fiVlll,J. 02493 0) 3. T11V lllilllllll{lll JVl LMVI, fl Vlll Mll, yl VpVa 1, 1111V ML Mltlllb M LVM11151st Vf .. M, fill Mil, V 111Vl L{4111111b Vl Jll KVlIMV MJUVV1M1V1 ..1111 L1VM1VMJ1111�., LV ....l Jll[.Lll LV S0 fVVI M111 L. .11 V111V1 111JlM11V VJ Jllahl LV 11V 1VJJ 111.l 25 fVVI. 4. Mil JVILMVll 1Vl1 Mll V111V11lJ 11MYV LVVlI U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\CODE\B ROADCAS. TO W 4 rice 5. TV YY .,1J J111.11 LV 111t11 €. d t1J 1V.�1111V1 L, t11V I'V1V1 Kl C�,111111N111VKtiV11J VV1111111JJ1V11 (I'CC) ,...111 t11V IV1V1t11 AY1t111.,11 Al 'Jtltitl.11l (FAA), L.lt 11.! 1lbl11111£, Jlwll L., 111VV1�/VILLtV11f 11Vt 1V.i t111V1 L, V1t11V1 GLb V11V,, Vtl1V1 t11K11 VJJVlltiltl JVVt.l11t, Ilgllt111b. (A111V1111.1 .1. 02493 0) 1VVt1tV1 lit It blV4t111 V1VYt1t1Vi1 ltt Vl t1LV YV 2,000 fVVt, t1Y V1KbV 11IVWl JV1L IV VVVl``, J1.µ11 L., 1..fV11V1 tV tl1V V}J&J.a Vs/in asa5V1 Vf t11V a111JV1t fVl 1 V1Y LV YY t1111 VV111111V11t. l l/111111V11thl Jl..11.1JV LV J.tL1111ttVd 11V111 tLV �V1V1t l AY1Kt1.J11 A11111111Jt11it1V11 (FAA) YYIIVIV FAA 1t1 L, 1.YY . (A111.,111Vd .1. 02493 0) 7. All Ll Vt11ViLJt111�, tV YY V1J Jl1t111 VVlllYl, YY itll ltll, t1111t1Vilt1l 1V..jlt11 V111V11tJ VJt1tLI1JI1V1 t4/1LL 111V L111V15V11V, .A.Jnhl1l{1111Vf1.1V11 OYVllt1, D1Jt11Vt 111 UVVt1V11 30 73. Add: 30-87-2 Broadcasting Tower A. Intent. The intent of these provisions is to regulate the placement of new and replacement broadcasting towers within Roanoke County. These provisions provide broadcasting tower applicants, property owners, and all other Roanoke County citizens clear guidance on the official policies and standards of the County. These policies and standards shall be used by applicants as a guide when selecting alternative broadcasting tower sites and broadcasting tower designs within the County. In addition, the County staff, Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors shall use these policies and standards, the U:\WPDOCS\AGENDATODE\BROADCAS.TOW 5 Roanoke County Community Plan and the general Special Use Permit criteria found in Section 30-19 as a guide for evaluating any future requests for broadcasting towers. In the interest of preserving and enhancing the scenic and natural beauty of Roanoke County it is the goal of the County to achieve a long term reduction in the number of broadcasting towers within the County, and where possible, to achieve a reduction in the height of existing broadcasting towers throughout the County, with special emphasis on towers located along or near the ridgetops of major mountains and land forms. In addition, it is the goal of the County, where possible, to achieve the relocation of existing broadcasting towers and associated utility and access corridors which have a high visual impact on scenic resources To this end, the County will work cooperatively with broadcasting tower owners and applicants and land owners to achieve these goals. It is the official policy of the County to encourage and promote the co -location of antennas on existing public and private structures within the County. To achieve this end, the County encourages all wireless communication providers to locate new antennas on existing structures . Permits for new broadcasting towers should only be requested when no other reasonable alternative exists for locating needed antennas. When new broadcasting towers are proposed as a last alternative, the requested broadcasting tower location, height and design should be chosen to protect and enhance the scenic and natural beauty of Roanoke County. Broadcasting tower locations at elevations lower than surrounding ridge lines are preferred. The use of stealth designs should be considered for any new broadcasting tower. It is the intent of the County to fully comply with all of the applicable provisions of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 and other applicable federal and state laws as said laws address and preserve Roanoke County's zoning authority and provide to the communication industry the right and responsibility to provide communication services within their service areas. U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\CODE\BROADCAS.TOW 6 B. Applicability: 1. These standards shall apply to all new and replacement broadcasting towers within Roanoke County with the exception that new and replacement broadcasting towers and associated antenna not exceeding thirty (30) feet in height and located within any commercial or industrial zoning district shall be permitted by right provided: a. The proposed tower is a monopole type design; and, b. The general area of the proposed tower is currently served by above ground utilities including electric power and telephone poles; and, c. All other use and design standards for the construction of the broadcasting tower and associated facilities are met. 2. No modification to increase the height, size, type or location of any existing broadcasting tower or associated facilities, excluding antennas, shall be made unless such modification results in the full compliance of the broadcasting tower and facilities with all of the requirements of this ordinance. 3. Antennas may be installed on any existing structure within the County, without the necessity of obtaining a special use permit, provided said antenna does not meet the definition of a broadcasting tower, does not increase the height of the existing structure more than ten (10) feet, and does not result in the structure and antenna exceeding the maximum structure height for that zoning district. 4. These provisions shall not apply to any temporary broadcasting tower erected for the purpose of system design or testing provided the temporary broadcasting tower is erected for a period not to exceed twenty-one days. In addition, in declared local emergency situations, the County Administrator shall be authorized to allow the temporary installation of a broadcasting tower for the U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\CODEBROADCAS.TOW H C1 7 duration of the local emergency. A zoning permit pursuant to Section 30-9 of this ordinance shall be applied for and approved prior to erecting any temporary or emergency tower. C. Application Requirements: 1. All potential applicants for broadcasting towers shall consult with County planning staff at least 30 days prior to submitting an application for a proposed broadcasting tower. During this consultation the applicant shall present information to the staff on system objectives, proposed coverage areas, and alternative sites considered and rejected. The staff shall provide the potential applicant information on Roanoke County policies and standards for broadcasting towers, and shall discuss with the applicant possible alternatives to broadcasting tower construction. 2. In addition to the application requirements contained in Section 30-19-2 of this ordinance, all applicants for broadcasting towers shall provide the following at the time of application: a. The location of all other proposed broadcasting tower sites considered and rejected, and the specific technical, legal or other reasons for the rejection. b. The location of all other possible co -location sites considered and rejected, and the specific technical, legal or other reasons for the rejection. c. Accurate, to scale, photographic simulations showing the relationship of the proposed broadcasting tower and associated antenna to the surroundings. Photographic simulations shall also be prepared showing the relationship of any new or modified road, access or utility corridors constructed or modified to serve the proposed broadcasting tower site. The number of simulations and the perspectives from which they are prepared, shall be established with the staff at the consultation required in Section C.1. above. U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\CODE\BROADCAS.TOW 8 d. A computerized terrain analysis showing the visibility of the proposed broadcasting tower and antenna at the requested height and location. If new or modified road, access or utility corridors are proposed, the terrain analysis shall also show the visibility of these new or modified features. e. Information on how the proposed site relates to the applicants existing communication system, including number of other sites within the Roanoke Valley, and the location of the antenna at each site f. All broadcasting tower applicants shall be required, at their expense to conduct an on -site "balloon" or comparable test prior to the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors hearings on the Special Use Permit. The purpose of this test shall be to demonstrate the potential visual impact of the proposed tower. The dates and periods of these tests shall be established with the applicant at the pre -application consultation. g. Written verification that all required submittals to the FAA as required by Section 30-87-2 D. 6 of this ordinance have been submitted. 3. The applicant shall be responsible for all fees associated with the filing of the application including the reasonable cost of any independent analysis deemed necessary by the County to verify the need for the new broadcasting tower. The Board of Supervisors shall establish these fees, which shall be discussed with the applicant at the pre -application conference. D. General Standards: 1. The maximum height of any proposed broadcasting tower and associated antenna shall U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\CODE\BROADCAS.TOW 9 be made as a condition of the special use permit, but in no case shall any broadcasting tower and antenna exceed 199 feet in height. Applicants shall request the lowest broadcasting tower and antenna height necessary to accomplish their specific communication objectives. 2. The setback for any proposed broadcasting tower shall, at a minimum, conform to the requirements for principal structures for the proposed zoning district. However, in no case shall the minimum setback from the base of the broadcasting tower to any residential structure on an adjoining lot be less than 40 percent of the height of the tower, measured from the closest structural member of the broadcasting tower (excluding guy lines). Guy lines shall be exempt from the minimum setback requirements in side and rear yards for the respective zoning district, but shall comply with the setback requirements for the front yard. 3. The minimum setback from any property line abutting a road right-of-way for any other building or structure associated with a broadcasting tower shall be fifty feet. Such buildings or structures shall be located a minimum of 25 feet from any other property line. 4. More than one broadcasting tower shall be permitted on a lot provided all applicable requirements have been met including setback requirements. 5. Broadcasting towers shall not be illuminated with any type of lighting apparatus, unless such lighting is a requirement of the FAA or FCC. When lighting is proposed to conform to federal requirement, the County shall contact the federal agency to verify the necessity of lighting, and to determine the minimal amount and type of lighting necessary to comply with federal guidelines. Security lighting, or a "down lighting" design may be installed on buildings and structures associated with a broadcasting tower. In no case shall any lighting violate Section 30-94 of this ordinance. 6. Any proposed broadcasting tower within two miles from any general or commercial airport or located at a ground elevation at or above two thousand feet, average mean sea level, shall be referred to the appropriate regional office of the FAA for review and comment prior to filing an application for a special use permit. U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\CODE\BROADCAS.TOW 10 7. All broadcasting towers shall comply with any additional requirements established in the Airport Overlay District in Section 30-72 of this ordinance, and the emergency communications overlay district in Section 30-73. 8. Any broadcasting tower approved shall be structurally designed to carry sufficient loading, and the site approved shall be sized to accommodate the additional equipment necessary for at least three other vendors/providers of communications services in order to minimize the proliferation of new broadcasting towers in the vicinity of the requested site. In addition, by applying and being granted the special use permit, the applicant and the owner of the land agree to make the broadcasting tower and tower site available for additional leases within the structural capacity of the broadcasting tower and at reasonable costs adequate to recover the capital, operating and maintenance costs of the broadcasting tower location required for the additional capacity. 9. A monopole broadcasting tower design is recommended. The Board may approve an alternative broadcasting tower design if it finds that an alternative type of structure has less of a visual impact on the surrounding community and Roanoke County, and/or based upon accepted technical and engineering data a monopole design is not technically feasible. Cost shall not be a criteria for determining broadcasting tower design. 10. No broadcasting towers shall be permitted within the critical viewsheds of the Blue Ridge Parkway or Appalachian Trail as shown on any official map designating these viewsheds and pre -approved by the Board of Supervisors. In addition, no towers shall be proposed within any other designated area of local scenic, historical, ecological and cultural importance as designated and approved by the Board of Supervisors prior to the filing of a tower application. 11. By applying and being granted the special use permit, the applicant and the owner of the land agree to dismantle and remove the broadcasting tower and associated facilities from the site within ninety days of the broadcasting tower no longer being use for wireless communications. Dismantling and removal from the site shall only be required after notice by the County. If antennas on any approved tower are relocated to a lower elevation, the tower shall be shortened to the height of the highest antenna. U:\W PDOC S\AGENDA\CODE\BROADCAS. TO W 11 A bond or similar performance guarantee may be required as part of the special use permit approval. Said guarantee will be in an amount sufficient to ensure removal of the tower and all associated facilities and the reclamation of the property and road, access and utility corridors to a condition that existed prior to tower construction. 12. All broadcasting tower structures and associated hardware, antennas, and facilities shall be a flat matted finish so as to reduce visibility and light reflection unless otherwise required by the FCC or FAA. 13. No business signs shall be allowed on the property identifying the name of, or services offered by, any business associated with the broadcasting tower. E. General Review Policies All special use permit requests for new broadcasting towers, including the replacement or modification of existing broadcasting towers shall be reviewed by the staff, Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors on the basis of the following criteria: 1. The extent to which the broadcasting tower proposal conforms to the general special use permit criteria in Section 30-19 of this ordinance, and the intent, application requirements, and general standards for broadcasting towers found in these provisions. 2. The demonstrated willingness of the applicant to evaluate co -location opportunities within the proposed communication service area, and the demonstrated history of the applicant choosing co -location sites within the Roanoke Valley. 3. The base and top elevation of the proposed broadcasting tower relative to surrounding natural land forms. Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, broadcasting tower locations below surrounding ridge lines are preferred. U:\W PDOCS\AGENDA\CODE\BROADCA S. TOW 12 4. Broadcasting tower locations already served by existing roads and utilities are preferred due to the potential detrimental environmental and visual impacts resulting from the construction of new road and utility corridors. 5. Within the needed service area, the availability of other existing structures that are, based upon independent analysis, of suitable height, design, and location for the needed antenna. 6. The visibility of the broadcasting tower from the surrounding community and neighborhood compatibility of the tower as determined by the submitted computer simulations, terrain analysis and balloon or comparable test. 7. The degree to which the proposed tower location, site design and facilities including fencing, buildings and other ground mounted equipment and new or modified road, access or utility corridors are located, designed and constructed to be compatible with the neighborhood. 2. That this ordinance shall be effective from and after its adoption. U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\CODE\BROADCAS.TOW - UMIS MUM - ISM Mos — MINS IMO IMIND MSS NMI MIS MIS ISM _ MIS MIS SIM MN ISM _ SIM - MIS IMM IMS ■ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. ISM Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ISM NMI ■ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ SEM ■ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk.IMO ■ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. MOP ISM IMM MID _ MIS SMS 1 1 1 1 — _ MIS WWI AGENDA ITEM NO. APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE % CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: Ise U r T7'/ C h S h o c/ i,kpc L% I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN,' WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ■ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakingon an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority oftheBoard to do otherwise. ■ ISM E VMS SIM SION — SIM NMI MVO PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK MIS NAME Q l'� hlk_ D o ADDRESS / 6% S -Ti c !G`, d ,`, // v e PHONE 3 F ?- - frimmimimmummiumminminimmilimmimimminimmilimmummimmimimminimellllllllllllllllllllillillllllllillllllliliillllllllillllillllil�- "I �IIIIIIIIIIIIIIillillilllllll�llllllllllllllllllllllillllilillliillllllllllllllililllllllllllllllllllllllillllll�l��l�lilllilllll,�,) AGENDA ITEM NO. _ APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCEy CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: Gien Va ( , _' •'5 • I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN,' WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: MIME - - - NEM MMINI 11 11 MEM MIME MIME — • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakingon an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. • Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. • • INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME / r�JJQ, F -Th ter ADDxESS'4liS 03,10ug Ln _ (5c)-1,e-1/7\ PHONE 3 O - l ( t OEM MEP - - Mal NNW MOM Min OEM - OMNI RIM - IMM MOM - MOM Mom MINIM IMO IMO MEM MEM NMI ORM 111,1 UMW MINIM MIN IMO MEM SIM UMW MIME MOM MUM OMR NMI - - MINN IMNP IMMO INNIU s ORM IMO - - - MOM NMI MMI SWIM MM. MOM MM. - - IMAM MOM - MIR OMB 11 MEW OEM - fitimmumummummilimmiummummuimmummummiummumimmimitimmimummifllilllllillllllllilllllllilllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllil if 1IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIillllilllililllllllilllllllllllil Illliillill Illlillillllllilllllllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllll1 — AGENDA ITEM NO. — _ _ APPEARANCE REQUEST _ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS C. �C V CJ a.- SUBJECT: LJL%V 1 • -- i+.�- ` Vim., 1 �' �V �i'��/ - I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: _ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will = — decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakingon an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority or the Board to do otherwise. = — - • Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ _ • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized - speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ - ■ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. — • INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK MEI EMI MEIN EMI OEM NAME ADDRESS EMI OEM MEI ENE E▪ IM MEM - IE▪ IM - PHONE lllllllllllllllllllillllllllli!hill millllllllllillllllillll milillllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllii mtii 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 AGENDA ITEM NO. APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE / CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: G/' I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. _ WHEN CALLED TO THE LEC'1'lf'JRN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS — FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakingon an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. _ • Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. MEM IMMIN MINIM - SIM — =ME▪ M - IMMO IMMO O MNI ■ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME ADDRESS _•6.(_( PHONE - 3 U millilllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllll 11 lllllllilillllllllllllllllilllllillllllilllillilllllllllllilllllllillllliilllllllllim IMM SUM MEM - - - AM▪ IN - - O wn IBM O MB UMW - - OMB MM. IMM MIM IMMO IMMO IMES IMENI IMMINF UIIt11111111IIIIt11IIILI1III11I111111111II1111111111111I{11I1111111111111111111111111111IIIIIII111111111llllll11111111IIllllhI111.j1i r - UM r N- Ili 0•1 Ili it NMI Pi AGENDA 11EM NO. APPEARANCE REQUEST lilt PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE / CITIZENS COMMENTSINNIn i Ili in SUBJECT: at a)2.._ Monte Ste- 1il c il Ili I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the UNIN meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS c FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LIS'i'EDMIMI = BELOW: _ ® Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment in whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will il decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, alli loi and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board toali ill do otherwise. - c c 51 Speaker will be limited to a pill resentation of their point of view only. I Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. i -11 Ni �1 MIMS Man il ® All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognizedli ill speaker and audience members is not allowed. >s s Men mare mown s Mown N oma MEN rt• e▪ el anion e mmil lama 11_ _ _ ® Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. a Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ® INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME �rrM ADDRESS S ( 8 Sti.21, PHONE `i - 07 Cv L i U41 _ O NE Minn i !NMI O NO 1_ N UM - NEIN 1111/1/.1 M▪ INS - mififllllf!!!f!Ilfllff}}}![III[I11}I1}1}}[f}}I[1Ii!}IIIIIill[I111ll1111111IIIl}1!lfffllllllll!!1[ffll}ffllflfflif!}[Ilflllf[Illfl� BIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIIIiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIiIIII111 _ _ _ AGENDA ITEM NO. _ APPEARANCE UE RE ST Q — _ _ — PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCEy CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: 6' ,) dl. fA l'C_i 5- D m l Pr ` �- S — s = I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: _ _ ■ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will = = decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. = • Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. = Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized = _ speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ _ • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ _ ■ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. _ • INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP = SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. = PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK _ _ _ _ MIS dElin NAME L- rat RibAoAr- UMW ADDRESS ~% .j . f 5aJe4 , Y� Z ��, E = PHONE 38 — gO4D = timummumnimiumuniumummimmiminimmimmimmiimmilimmimmimmilinninelllillilllllllllilllllilllllilllilliilllllllllllllllli�l BIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIU ME s - 11111 MN ME Mil IMI _ MEE MEM MN IMO WM AGENDA ITEM NO.MEM MEE ME MEM ENE MEM MEM ION APPEARANCE REQUEST MN IIM Q MEE EMI MEM - OEM EMI OM MN PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTSWM IMO le IME - AM NM IMO MEI SUBJECT: l r I f ti v ct r Nk. k'i I-_' 5c, - ,0- 1 MEP OEM JEEP IMm ISO OM MEE NM NM I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the MEE UNE MO NMI meeting on the above matter so that I may comment.OM ME ll WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS MEN 11 SIM UM EMI FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED IIII IME IMO BELOW: — ■ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will MIMI = — decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakingon an issue, and will enforce the rule unless iEIME EEM nstructed by the majority oftheBoard toEWE do otherwise. OM _ - _ ME Gl OM ■ ME MEI Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. = Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. _ ■ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized = speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ =MEM OEM isSEM EWE Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ ■ Ele MEM Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. _ IEEE MEM OEM MEM ■ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUPMIMI SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. =: MEN Amos MOM _ _ SEEM PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK MEE MEM MEE NAME liveVVM ADDRESS 1 Ai (I GLiCY )C f PHONE ^ - �3 (3(,?_ _ - - - _= timmimmimmiimmimmirnimimmimmiiimmimmimminimmillimmilimmumminimmfr BIIIIIIIIIIIII111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 IMO - eB — IMM — - IONN IMP AIM INN MSS 0011 NW MIN MID MIN IMO - ORM - .00 - - - IBM MID MIM MOM — OIME 10011 MIN - - 60110 MOO IMO mln IMMIR NMI OEM OWN MEM AGENDA ITEM NO. APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: G---DkOLak-k";4\ki c Q S I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speakingon an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority oftheBoard to do otherwise. • Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a speaker and audience members is not allowed. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • view only. recognized Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. • INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAMEc r1Cu�� ADDRESS EC CLA- NMI - - OIMM MIN IMO MEI MOM MME SNIP - IMMIM - MUM - MM. MOM - SIM MmI - - MID MEI - IMO 11 UMW OMNI IMO MIN MIND MIN ONMI - WINE - - - - - MIK - IMM 1111 MOM IMP - Inn - MOM MIN MIM — — IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIlIlIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII111111111111111m B111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1111111111111111111 - OEM - - MIN - NMI - _ - _ _ - - ■ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. MOM Mal SIM ■ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized MMI speaker and audience members is not allowed. IMMIS 1111 ■ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. _ MOD ■ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ■ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. NM: 1111 MEM PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK 1=1111- - 11111111 SEM SIM .MI 5111111111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIII11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111116 Wan - Min 1111 111 111 1111 .1111111 11 MIN AGENDA ITEM NO. APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE -ITIZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: �/i/1//9-/Q Salo I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ■ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. NAME likil//m7 J. ADDRESS /339- /L i� J/�/ S/ • PHONE a‘oU 111nuu11111111111111111uun1111111111111111uu11111111111111111111111111111111111I11IIIIIIIII1Il11111111111IIi11111111IC1(IIUjJ MI▪ RO Moe - 11.11. - - Is▪ m soml N OM IMO min In MIN mos im- n MOE IBM o mon PIM U MW cNNW NOM NMI - mo▪ m Aso IBM OEM M▪ INS MINN NNW len MEWS w ool MEOW lama fa▪ Slog anima Sams leammi mess ale Ipwride amin N ▪ ona Own _ - - 21.111111111 lama Amnon anINEMI Immo AGENDA ITEM NO. APPEARANCE REQUEST _PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE v---6-11ZENS COMMENTS SUBJECT: cY-0 J ( I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY' THE GUIDELINES LIS'1ED BELOW: Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman- will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ▪ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ▪ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ® Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. Speakers are requested to Ieave any written statements and/or comments with the clerk. ▪ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK AUTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK NAME Tx-rhl. rc� 56hnd( ADDRESS Jjij itj �GL. PHONE 9gq-� � z IMMO Mon Moor MEM - - mom Mal O▪ E▪ M MEM ammo MEN MEM Iona IMMO N MI U MW - _ a BEM MEM MEM - W WI MIN N MI MEM Irma IMO MIN MOM mom NNW MOO .111111 MEM MOM _ _ NMI _ Maw UMW NNW MON _ a MEM - OMB IMMO I▪ M▪ O RO▪ M _ c BIM alms �Illillllltlllllllllll11llllltl111111111111111111111111II I11111111II1II1I1111l11111111111I1IIIIIIiih1I11111I1II111111111111111111m We the undersigned support the recommendations and prioritization for Glenvar Middle and High Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated March 17, 1997. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations for additions and renovations at these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Board to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that Glenvar Middle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Print Name Address Resident (House #, Street, City) 1. �0r\Y e ----ca e.,- LSZo (.36vir,'i„ U r SG ter -A 2. S;01) „( S;DDr?n(02E) 3y39C4tA&1 4 tmiiEf/J) ,s741 i 3. u 4 iZ 'E-L., Lct--- —r: . t , c r, n Q or Aro 1' y.c8 4. 4e,- Q. n o n y 40 3 O Id e +0 w .bc- '12cQ 5. - ..z. .. - Lam; sj 14-Ail-id (39 ,%t.O d in 6. Lima/kJ earns IlLaladde, 0656 f1h iYOLS6, .44,796/Lia firw -6mny iiI,/jin i -,V(.> 7 6z;ru J/ A ' i 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. We the undersigned support the recommendations and prioritization for Glenvar Middle and High Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated March 17, 1997. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations for additions and renovations at these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Board to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that Glenvar Middle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Resident (Print name on line below signature) Resident Address (House No. & Street Name and City/Town) 1. 'Ja ` azA akato ,,26-94 Act,x cL, .- ,x: LA ci Sab !t I c-rr -Kc-6 cr. 5 , 2. Ie (tJu C ,,,d, J ,5 &41 , k,� S. J 1cr 3. aiOn aie te_ l,5 c997d ,r/./b/n ,&, i. / ``lkrm CJU- _ r Chia hd l0/5 Dr-, - 1e r-1 �mm Love 5. ,v-L-41-\' r Q end .0 5 t 1 \ \ d LccM }Z A\ So-lem � 6. k=o' r a.S'3sl J[1 o, Av . ).„);frZ Pe.v-erc ('3-dt , Vq, 7. 4,k, '1/4.ArJ6)c) NV=, uk wTA 6, Uin c c 4Sah ctirro )T 1 8. I) is mk .�__XY1\,W SS S ? k/3 c h c (` o IL E Hi •t 1 q Y/L.) 3 SQ Ier c � 9. Z Sq y iail(1y ««/1 /)K- �Z�ic . ,4�.u.k tt rest d s Szi ,L--6-7` f s %-6 b.. ti4 2 51/ S 3 G G-(2nca DIP. 11. 12. 13. 4 We the undersigned support the recommendations and prioritization for Glenvar Middle and High Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated March 17, 1997. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations for additions and renovations at these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Board to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that Glenvar Middle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Resident (Print name on line below signature) Resident Address (House No. & StreetName and City/Town) 1. 1 , ( - I 135 far/ -1)r- k L 440 Ishou sf r , 3dJPj 1 Yik l 1, 3 2. 6 lrpxillan y6,5 n/db-- a )n0e IF 11 'oil I SQIoh V,4 3. e r,i4, ' '�z'z1----� -if $� �, /�j �.a_c a.� / .w i Au I e N. 5hera) 40ct, 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. We the undersigned support the recommendations and prioritization for Glenvar Middle and High Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated March 17, 1997. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations for additions and renovations at these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Board to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that Glenvar Middle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Print Name Address Resident (House #, Street, City) 1. 2. 3. rn� L<rt, rnij_r 3 •re/9- , S 'teat r!' (1c D 1((`j�{ ►C_^, Se e 4(404 Le ed-z, /ckG�rre �� c 9 ..J 7. `�� ' ��' , ' �-7� ���� H �N (Pik --3T-0 hm, L I', . ft, Vt ast , r3 1NZ_ ,ern 8. 9. 10.ver '6 11. _ �,� C-r-c 12. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 0 Qc 5/4-"'YI2II C ��eUk�e 1/;I0)'. 5447's3 .-Z e •`�\O�ct�Yra��. 3-0 ()NS N c 1- rS 3t;(4;, e_B 3vCP 25. ailicikk. Qd I62&, 0/1. , iJ co/i C A\\ cta n. Par ks 1,23 Po-Ace-C. I l-00 rPn 6 0%Cfl r 7e--17 ray SI/)►P rt.c SA It (/ri 54tudt# A-4a( -2)1Dr1 ridloies e_J 11,(0,7101- 9_vis- mr 403- 4J;lS000sR> _;ck 6), r \ 9 u6kA, 7)((rly aciWan ca(r? P c(A- sctL„ Xf S f /Ct(A-s>➢ Z i f// f eteiAmoo G,J 111)-v e 3 11z5 V ti We the undersigned support the recommendations and prioritization for Glenvar Middle and High Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated March 17, 1997. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations for additions and renovations at these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Conunittee. We ask the School Board to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that Glenvar Middle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Print Name Resident Address (House #, Street, City) 1 {` d Ai rsoA) 2.> 1 n ara/ i-o �U3 / c.5f��/?Q . 3. Y C ra-� Th, �" X �(,✓cte adz rt fu-+i'&,&cr AS .,5' .-r-A. � 6 -i. �f ,��iii? Jo/ L . M/ �c__HE�6- tp 77 3/eA9S1-/Aw KO 42— �J . 7, tt_ 1--b c� • (fr i 8. �E / ' ". Sk' J.a ao iz A.ec,�:+Qk 44. 9. �•e.om-y aicaso.J /k/./3 y� ff y 11. K 1�C�rd 1 Ju 12 1 � Gu I / `) H iP O7/ lti/7-//272ii /F3/ (AkAcaoo 11J).;JNz- 1, V/{. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. c. We the undersigned support the recommendations and prioritization for Glenvar Middle and High Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated March 17, 1997. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations for additions and renovations at these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Board to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that Glenvar Middle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Resident (Print name on line below signature) Resident Address (House No. & Street Name and City/Town) 1. !OPA . & aO (J tA-krtou_c� l,ct.t 1-cina P a.c19e1" S , U A- a (-1 1 S 3 2. R / -57, r �% /6-ow) /a//) . '6 wroti- /7 . G/2,4 imYr1^ •�Cc tein , (7' ...a-Sli S 3 3. Nmeftte c. Fact,„,,• 16)1 o au_ee.,,-b,„ . lit , --, v Pk- a y (53 4. r , 4)-1.1 e rre_ le -n,l,_iv, `ice, A cl 5. 330q 1-ocu ST 6 20 0 E L A) & CZ r %..e., T�) Sjl( Sit-f-d_o-ka.&, 34 /env 6. o-kn IgAy- Leto R - Sck 7. ( /i2 U I.La . cV-)o7/1/ 1 / la 7i / 0cim i t l al ve. eRei - TifoPl*'i/ X le m ,VA ZL1153 8. iti oc s��, ki(/a�vtas /lam) Rd ktm kSJ)er- 9. 3 fo S I G-Ice1Zdr. ll„ �( 5 ..a-i-e, Ala. a.�tS3 10. '1P5 / Oxus Hollow koad Marl C . -ha.n SO/Lrn ✓a - 2g163 11.E -�2- . 317 /r ,gQ / EL vi5 . A I� A4- La 41) SAL&M1 VA 2415-3 12. 1 en ilaceiii 13. a _i-4�, L y.-�a ,ki -cct 1 'm /)cam • d //5-T aw+ -We the undersigned support the recommendations and prioritization for Glenvar Middle and High Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated March 17, 1997: We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations foradditions and renovations at these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Board.to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve -funding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that Glenvar Muddle School and GlenvarHigh-School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Resident (Print name on line below signature) Resident Address (House No.. Sr. Street. Name and City/Town) 1. 4 `il d}±� ,t ,t, 4/'111W L0r2 i.? -.) .Ls1--. ertk i V1 ood oa,i%, i L' . , C. -) 9 Z.. !1F / . iG -txe .- if)�C/ j /z - r , {,:� c . 2 CfC ! / S ? 3. 44e._v S3 r c Cr, f ti�.e l i_ _ 1.L C e4v\ Yc �2. +4• rr G\c c e (1 Y -,'m S 4- usc.r ('1 9 o 1--c * itcAnie.- '0 SaIP,-� vl4- agIS� Lea✓ gym, .5. n,,N cC a � 52. S c-tl -''c, f' 1 Is S� k-i,,, V [i-a `} 1 S 3 6. ll // pot it (7AZti,ze 1 1l1 3 Yf� ,4//S )//o L) ,&-• ;1 C lu -c k u ie \ c 7. FL--vrk-2--"\....US% - �f e r,, ►_.) 8. I- J e7 .U_,. ._, .5c a g Cy r- _ /','//r Qy- . 9. -I i h (. t,Cec /ti, Ze1 SZ' 1tiic� C' /%C7.3 Li Iti 1 -- 10.. ,•�;fi� (47 ,?,k'ics' �•z e-t.�)�. 6_,z . JeIe,i 7, v 11. y`'` li._, 76,6- I, (` r, ���� Uk Q F q-0,- 1 F-Q�.,), \ Q_O�..l,--l.t/l ed L•0 ►Z, 1 c (-01 A 12- {(/.1,,.), ,o -A,,, (� /� ..1 Q C `17. /_,2 . C4,--J,. eel? LEN11/11 C f2kr�.r I.. L __ Lie, 'f Jar ' ,.0c.,� �-_ZA ,57 / - K. a C r-- We the undersigned support the recommendations and prioritization for Glenvar Middle and High Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated March 17, 1997. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations for additions and renovations at these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Board to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that Glenvar Middle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Print Name Address (House #, Street, City) Resident 1., ` �,i,: ,.,JI a-� r-� t ll Y Wce I s .>.yo •1f -Tv ma. b4d/ ,56,601 2. Nai^Hl 141 r,-lc:•A., i�1CU— - tit%tbu' - \a..: Di- , I•l 3: t sz,vt (n 'rAAAA) �k�c, J k e. vk L. v S Q Lc /; / r it ,( 4. �-�i.ui,t t - (,G�1v-r next ( i4 Y Sk{,l YkS-f r y t'r? (, �n % i ver)S - it (,cr e& 5. e N1 lM Sf a I ( M3 gctcela",d ,'1:1 I ed 6. . ,/ J., ,^/L �l Lu s'� 1�T�+ . a' I F-r t.,4\ M e tjr,J L h if. E_ Kc. 3 CO 0(._ r-n icc.4 J 773f 1 I a rczn ;d l<, 1-7Q-(r 1 tiot (vL ,,, 1Amvu( S4 15. , r� .. _ LJ o. .(.4 £ 16. 4). 17.� IL, ' '! �prj) AQ ner 18 /(by (/ • ✓c ni 19-r.,_ J4.t, — ' r . $A4.7 o1e/; ry / Le6,0)/< us'ric/ ' , /,V kl )/krr 7;Il i.'n.i7 tti\t\-k- 474Poi�,�`�<..�.Uc jinn L o Cifck Q(0)(k. 3 u c lo,i j_ / i /r:-YL Cr;/1 r N PL Y)N1 e51 514s Jd Ipqi2o_ d S�/ate,_ /o 2 4..- rai; /' .6)/i<;. S Ak '5 t r3 kee y its S /()57/714,er<) tvlc /c.,a(: 54,rn;.\(A- z6z/7 (Oe c)(Y`r( -c z v c, „/.(/ GL .Q f:.- (L JA- 16. 17. 18. 19t� 20. 21. 22.:��: We the undersigned support the recommendations and prioritization for Glenvar Middle -and High Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report. dated March 17, 199T. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations for additions and renovations at these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Board to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that Glenvar Middle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Print Name Resident Address (House#, Street, City) 3 Z,2 4. '7YA �,1< Ar�tlo, t1� ul /A �6(/i7 6 f , 4- C,. Sa /60/ I/a '7 4 0 Pi-�cc. K Lc �. F A/ �u it a vi t P� Sig S7� 5S3-rwl i�i I�w 0. S� lSIG . ��-,�` ,�t wu.du Hayes 407I 3z.r1 L'Y])r,,. .Igym.. 7. Q p t ate, _A,�/, 1 G'sbN Ke, k%l \ Li100 agar/rLi Or s, (ram 8. ', L /0 v",--) 'rrs w�,_,,, n 5x'z r_�� 9. ..3 573 a-4.- 4,4, vim, 10. :, 3 "YO Ate' 7/1 ,19`, /8, /.� /.3.0y9 S 11. fa I 7y0 . o ciced7y. `i". VC% o7C//53 12. j ; I Li Y fv\ , rarr611 5711131a 1<k ..ii4 c; vcf{ .4 Vek 7 q (3-3 13.2),) y PT/:s 5f/ (%91 c/ /-5.- ��-�--j U4 14. �� ►'i 5 IJcr ,,1 I Z7C` 1 r l b"Et fivId - .-.181/4•\\ rt N.. -(4/m 1J4 Irish sb1Pt� and P e -IUD c Otj t( ' I; 0 firciirit-'t eL Thi 3 7dt.7,Tc Lr-r'- L .3251 it/c41/4.. (1.5-c,./P, (/A 3_7 IJ 5o14mi We the undersigned support the reconunendations and prioritization for Glenvar Middle and High Schools as.stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated March 17, 1997. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations for additions and renovations at these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Board to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that Glenvar Middle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Print Name Address Resident (House #, Street; City) w. A.1 ). ,'r/6- Y6.0� _ ei .r l c �' �C� -r-ei(6 s /45Li /6e 3. bt 1 c� ire c (uOoo l 4. NN\ e . Offle/y) rz_n A 1("n u 3 2 a I /5lc'i '5. S a b_a : nr \ k&i? I L Et, ck , ,, Lane 6. Iner`‘_ Ic1(MU1,-\-. Ai1r'trrZwoa,1 /, 7. -1, i io 11✓LCQ'� SUl'1nnc/,�,� }r_i,�l /a/ �l 0/ OVPek(,�=ooGi/' J� 8. j1!1Q l� 6 re ! i PI r I , 1_ 7 6 �P C r'o SSi', , // ,� �q/, ., 9. on � o tY}rcI (s" '319 (Y1cE)Ar-c-c c--N . 12.. E J —De ryg_ LA,srn, s I 303 "v`1oo� l ctr d al Coo, f riy 24 LI Z-4 13TT c- , 34'Y`rrr /(,..¢, ,) C; 1/4 `' 14 ,`.�r�r �.P� 368 lay i cf %�z / F. Z�IS.� 15.- /.l(Lf _Si.I cc Aus-\-,„ 105-) Mar+, n - m c ( IZCI ..C'L- ; 16.f2} (riS(c)rr, (P,.n(-r+ 1 17 18 19. 2Q 21. 22\ 3 "7 r(1 r'c -, .1 r, 17�Sc fp�t. rtCeiea.�e 1� .. een 1.<e4-h SLtf3 alp 1 t, SCIem, V i 50 z C1y y,1 /r ,S r u7o (6 a\� tea_ , 4,1 c$v MG.� SPA 2/5. lionsS 6Mt VL, �Sec7 Chew, ' /✓lll� -jec 161 air i �ci C' I( / 1� . : 610 %3-) g1;:) rfr le j 1 ,ten s.11r `'1 `r 3 0 / \1-:/ ►�'� �, i�' , S^r!. /s (�M11 j _�/ 1/ L i l 1(.e.Q Y r'11717 & v s/ /er - Xe/Ti<f >� c.-C__ sZP/ SAcL,f ,�c .� e .� e\I 1_ rOcun 374 -7 £ ARO/;1ES7 57‘747)6--e' 9 sr, $ We the undersigned support the recommendations and prioritization for Glenvar Middle and High Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated March 17,1997. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations for additions and renovations at these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. We, ask the School Board to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that denvar Middle School and Glenvar 1iigh School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities.' Signature of Roanoke County Print Name Resident 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12 1 1,4+rt Address (House #, Street, City) A1u1►1 n Moody 6v 5 k2IV_51,-*h/lo4} //Pr/'�, DF /X /2 4 rztw/p e 7�/41/ e,ci�7 C o/t /P .x /,2 %'// 7i4 -P/9( ' I Grl f ' //r1.4 Ivn ZP/`% T t r '76 l 61falygR ®' Dirk /t 18. 19. 20: ( c 1 � r �� Ltc E )` j Ji) 1..123x 1(-f L D \ 2 ,✓7 r-rerP4d 22.E J ;1 pt /01CF7 3' 30(0 -AW/A j (¢•'' �(G.v1GC'r L%HSi Givens S6.1z4,ti We the undersigned support the recommendations and prioritization for Glenvar Middle and High Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated March 1T, 1997. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations foradditioas and renovations at these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Boardto seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that Glenvar Middle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. ., Signature of Roanoke County Resident (Print name on line below signature) Resident Address (House No. & Street Name and City/Town) t 1 .tom ,...)r ; ,••.(, %. 1 )// .-" .i / . r 4. I • 1 _r..� -,,,,`� - • .\ .... (/ 8. - f!.r2 �. v /r-- i,L_..C_� r. .f h. 1 /_. '1 l / r Vic.<- , 1 -)1)C.r, /i//-;,-l.' 1-2. (');",,../) 'h (.:;. - �.- '' 1; ' 13. . c,,,, .1,.., _ 2.',.:t,- ;. r. ..:,. ;.7,:,. .:.;;-:,_ tiG:,(I,• li. fr•.. , ) L. We the undersigned support the recommendations and prioritization for Glenvar Middle and High Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated March.17,. 1997. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations for additions and renovations at these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Board to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that GlenvarMiddle School and GIenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Resident (Print name on line below signature) Resident Address (House No. AL Street Name and City/Town) 1. . i\icthui Wad , tins CSe!„►`.j, N.-. n -A. L„ Sack''-. VA -"i ►.53 — 2. 41(.:/-1 0 /v a y fi 4 s A // /eci _ l'/, .E C n ti(Z 15 / c/L- a Y( 3. Ja: u t -Si ca-&Q ' ad' S- 4 r bpi-i,..y rr3 C'.i eCi 6,, , q e. S L ci rvc S U.1 sq yy-\ iif c.. ;U 1 S-3 -4. -- Q_: 4q q Dan Po bin Rd _ ne._-glen --„ 5i -n, Va. z -I' 3 '5. _ 499 ci Da.✓i R Ubi r, Rd _ - V � � Daq Id NI . c. Salmi-,-,, Va . 24-1 6. .1 La ,,k (:.‘rr r-P ;, ,., S Q c -f cf / 1ZR. __cat,' rn (;_,6_R C Ic.AA, (Th 7. ,1-e4-4.r1 ,/ /Y i ,,y 14/4v,) . 47,,i-r%r / f (1y41 (9' . 8. a,i" --7 L A-4o L-7 f4 f ,,Z1f/.7 S ? 2-7 t,,e.4,4 -Cr- / CC, 9. lv 1 /773 i',j/A,-, d � . ;C2 cP 4, >' gar- 5. ie..,7 JJ» -zX/53 H.Lac L ;, 16 j 4 4- M 6 r�C2,,.� .-1-US .- L D rt. `ik ("`) L e T J .s. Lc?lit . — (Pi ..2.,4 ( 5.) 11. I-& 670�A /I az, 7 G a y ✓ A, ' „ Ti/1/ ‘.5..� iit J,,Q- 25/J9 12. /� 5`%03 Tmr-R»BtdK e-r.' . .1 7 re-3 L- H ssi-/ r 01- 1 `7/53 ' 13. nee,,,,.. /c/. >ki..-G ,_.Sr91.f'7y ryes 7 /k n .'c A AM- /& y i/ -rn g ,ei „5,ol:-c I/ i 1 15- We the undersigned support the recommendations and prioritization for Glenvar Middle and High Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated March 17,1997. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations for additions and renovations at these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Board to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that Glenvar Middle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Print Name Address (House #, Street, City) _Resident 1.1----, 4..� SN.r s�=5 - C'7�1,,/2.-C C JW a #/ I./1 ?vi. 7•d / / �// '/�, i�/�SSA /��'A�,�E�.�_ .Gd� 5 3- �Qw-� �rz9 e..!' t Q -36VL ` 0 6 r_ �.2 S ZJ L-ryv�;�� Q <.JL �l,! =�.�,,,� th/ J 4. / — iye x C/1 ate-:, .�,..- h;./%. Or- 414-3 `,- Pfr ro.P jYC�? cc / ,,� f r,.-4.7 . ���� G/ �C�a` /�/�' t,Y� U� 2 (� r) q, , 4}iln ci ' I. 4-,;,, fi . A,-r,jm / L\ y ice°"„0 /I'/_ / ;,.' �,bi9 �/' �-; - 7. �,r- ,^`, -{ice . / in ,, [8. a,z- .i,d,- , G�, Mar -:_I . r\_;._10 Ja ��r, �,� Cam, f r , ��- 9. ( . _ " �.. .-- 1.. / _:l"` �_j ll.r.. 14 , r-:, '^j' `'^ ).-7 •� I 'T t,, > ,I v-o•vr <' ? , / !c 11/A� : 1 •, t.� i 11 '" 20 21. 22 23. 24 . .• _ .f J r 1 i l t; t .• ,- 1.- 1,% a � ti ll, A ,. , ' . -C S l' t • r�. < <.�, L., / i. %err\ C f / /- i J\.P( r- :(_.i^.� r„ :% _,:. _-- . g'irwiirnn 5c horMil Vet' J4 rZ rv2i 1,01'.5 , (• 61-e01 Q`h W, j t I 3066 Knit) LE15 610Rc/ 5,4 EM r � We the undersigned support the recommendations and prioritization for 'Glenvar Middle and High Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated March 17, 1997. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations for additions and renovations at these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Board to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that Glenvar Middle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Print Name Address (House #, Street, City) Resident 2. 3. -1. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13 14` 15. 16 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 714,/,5 76gc‘4) - r_94_aaZZ 4), \c �C\�� ( i'v scs CelnYl./1'LlA_ r,'t )1 (1 t) F. ,/'12 /%' a (11 I ry) (' CJ (1, ,rl fv�^— ,,, 'To ���o v+� e ¢ 3 18 _ ,2-7hn- C rduzc, l.At 1g 0 2_, L/!//iv' 57oh, L9ev1- tErzfit !11( IZA4 3Por J21 U 1* 467 )0io/ / A-JOnei'��: 4 C )1.-c.r,a c )L4 4 n ic, 6' I Eviziws / 76 / I ->< I,/�'� /;/ /��%!(( -) /// oT 3 ,ec) 7J i ^ <a L /k7,e/- 4 Ait -eic/-1,0 r I e n, i 4 ,v,v 9 7a S h c (i4 o u r,ve Ade Ai i v fir n .0 ()r e-nc) rig We the undersigned support the recommendations and prioritization for Glenvar Middle and High Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated March 17, 1997. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations for additions and renovations at these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Board to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that Glenvar Middle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Print Name Address (House #, Street City) Resident j. 0 Az- 10 1 14. 15. 16 17. 11-4c.P 1-//7L ,.-7 ‘/e lP x79 C r' 1' 0 b OX \ 1u F -►513ILn 020A_ 24� 1Z /)')6--7A i/✓c` ��AYni� S % '�`1 E /C,�{L� �i� fl /C Ls- o c:Ei, i-)4L/, ,ci/, :�(//// �-4 CMvlF0,Ci (7L? -Copy (Ix' 144 \ CIA- �`� �� '7 \S fLtNY-U- L,6VA —Dv Y^CI. ,�d ►� .�.X �l t e,, c,J - �. . ak , c / <<.// s2// Cl1?'/1 L INNIWKIP 111111111111 ,-tee • 1 rrre�l -S� l.- L ; / A; 0 1....)1C 20. 21. _ Mec t , 22. ., ,� 231, _ 24. i1 25- /7/z? 2', 7fitic— 37r% .6-6./;4 t tic 37 .„Ewe.Mr' " ✓,,.�ry,� 'di) IL„-i '- . S ),,,. 4 c.S `t 5 c-% C /t c h s j/LC/ -) .' J i� �i • it�IZ. 21. We the undersigned support the recommendations and prioritization for Glenvar Middle and High Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated March 17, 1997. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations for additions and renovations at these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Board to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that Glenvar Middle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Print Name Address (House #, Street, City) Resident 1. .,..,vv-ivn f ,F / .0 avn I-�, (40-0 r J i 2. �/ Aa(- �'/.�r�-ti! ( //' ne IA /.1 -ir�� /7 Elva: L5..d/fi t1 rA/ in- 1-ifritvc e" 7//r- 11.1DiT. 6. l 7- / ,, c � 8.c.�.�� 9. iNAR— k 1 6 -� - � � <' A� e 1-•s G r / nn / L L.. x L \ c!Jn )oot1 JoL y .7"7/Q i [ e, 1 c r2 N 14. 15. , J /: `'-. _r ) 16. 17. 18. % .. 19. L nJ 1 A 1AL .4 0PIO c / r". .t s 1rn1 r\\ 5 L_ 3 Scot G cc t_ -r;) 1 �2 Sun( on( .�v,cr'Mvcr Rid 1 2 5kvv f ; -eA /uo o 5,�; a ,,1'0/// - 20. •,ojr J \NAc �`� (ems. fi � a5mn ->"" ; c �.1 �`r'. (' .22. -: • L. a^'- r-w ,CLa»r. - -. 23. �. �i/z ,,. / �-r',/71/2'% 1�r�',' -/tJici,),�,n. Zc.�'�", ,/ e ( TB C C 1 - • 1st, , (,e<'•& We the undersigned support the recommendations and prioritization for Glenvar Middle and High Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated March 17, 1997. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations for additions and renovations at these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Board to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with'additions and renovations so that Glenvar Middle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Print Name Address (House #, Street, City) Resident 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. n c 17. i es Q� f1vll ss 18. 19- ac.4117/ 1 /. 7t e 20. i' ►1')h . 21& 211. 2. . I./','�' , fit Al , o. CG(/ti(a4 N.', --)LiC'11 23. 9 '(,.!_.Z., /J : % XgI,l(ict. 1---)v\ ,I )' , -? ..'K1L,,,,,,,a�7! .cam ' 1v�(--- -r-+- ll_ ; 11'.', r r 5.- .)el' :, 25. -�'. ,�-k,: / 1 -71 ca .1 , i, i .::r-7 �-;, c: - (I c'o 1 • Perna I ()tee It,. /71,5963 C ennL -1 (tco cL Lf77L - nvN� l NAfR/S 1 ), ;1 C). -i C171�1 L, /-,lr,' 1 1130,zk‘,(..0 1,4; E ' r n C/IV a r t.SO►1 ��I 7 IQI (.uoo )e Sct/ k '3553 ,;icw - KKK' tee• (7-r_ nr1IT!AT yL:)-ms, 01 Y1 OA iSZi t4c F k0 . 6V-, :t 4-i 7y 01 Al;//i/e5 M. 41/ <: /.✓ SA«Al 1/4 i2Y/2- e I/, �/�,:;:r J J t ? I/CLs cc c( A`!' $ We the undersigned support the reconunendations and prioritization for Glenvar Middle and High Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated March 17, 1997. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations for additions and renovations at these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Board to seek funding and the Board of ., Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that Glenvar Middle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Print Name Address (House #, Street, City) 1. 8. 10 Resident r� a1.�Lt1 2 ez.,/12 , 4$ ,,,►,�L a.� SLivitu 576 11/eoS dry 6 ?-\/ ? C/Jm fA c--ec 4 lhe1s f �,�. y s G..�, 6 e/ 4>, 5,4 COnnl u 300$ ''. l i a Sa er £ Scow-bcx-P-'bq 1 C 6 4 .G/, - (Z . .54 (Yfr\. _ 6 C&(d_la--s� �r6. 16(e_. ! / //ejjl 2,d) ? 5 U,tti 7F ( 11. 12. ,L lQAA,,! J !1 13.E 14. 15./XL2c.0 16. L 17. -- Th 1-€ hr y f 5 .--114a-n LA/ /21.1cnc 356 5/ LgtuveI 6, /ei fi (,urytAv G 7‘.� qtlk • c l� 1�✓ • ,ram 5 t,-qt, t'; 47. 7 //- /r 6 IA a d _r s ���at, /e4 A tit C.c��� 24. 25. n(Y 40. _‘-4 fr 1J�c7ce-c.I / ()Q. rig We the undersigned support the recommendations and prioritization for Glenvar Middle and High Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated March 17, 1997. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations for additions and renovations at these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Board to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that Glenvar Middle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Print Name Address (House #, Street, City) Resident 1• De 2. 1O. LJ v »U (', Gin d' t i&ei4 t / z3 ,c4 Ke l C(.1 D fl e e a cur, Av 131 // t�L,(7s 1 oC t't t.a.er c�� / f (.4 // :21 Cf 1 L/i )r/uc�-� 1 12.-; 13.40G‘),?� 15. 1. ' 18. 1J 19. ._ - i : 20. /L 14 iv V / 71tca /l:) /»v,rh5 21. 1IL : ,, �,:. •7- /, 23 1<AT! ?immermQ,,, -i-D6 F(pr. - Ao CY r�rc�SC�i Cep ��n �"r1 1l%d <-14 /0)/lJU)1r=1'S 1e 771 ice ,-ULJ - -v % (4% T)� ,fit "2)b� r� (r� /ee,/,(: �C Card 1�2�5G:1 — �C� v / � V� 5Cd 11 L �� rJ 13C; a e -ri, II 5 - 5 3 yr 74 ,c jt/J w1 V.X1 Zr L' 7.214' /G47 ✓��-�� 2 S //7 `'>L LC' .�. s ���. 1 , Cz l N 1r '1 - O d.4 Q • n 41 c+ .CC,_I ern • a 24. CL, i / j f .� kal ,Ul /i rn i % ,• /�'' n / / ly m 20. 21. 2' 23. 24. 25. We the undersigned support the recommendations and prioritization for Glenvar Middle and High Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated March 17, 1997. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations for additions and renovations at these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Board to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that Glenvar Middle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Print Name Address Resident (House #, Street, City) - ,. r _ /1737 5G 7<' c( t- 2. 12 /4 , Ge°,2R ssEb4,u•n 3. �-- �/ JP; Cal „ : ;i-z y/ /6 )4 Cam- vu6D 02.4ALIAcc, Jz i ( i p inky i v L k Ri vd dl4 n L ,l4-4- e,S . , -I-4 /p R r QcQ . n ' 9. 10. 11. 12. 17. L.) "-A' VFLA c. 1I1 6 EIc.lip D,2 -6 . 9 i-hLr-zz'd ' 1 I r l J 3 c 2 /.' _ (c� �� �� L Q-Cp(+e2_ 2rb kj IAt ` (-./,11,!... f�.i N-CIF� `�E i‘tQFISOri nib f4)ir.!)v(�/tJd (k / O . � / 1 0 113 rd5-0 r i> 0 d (Ful 1; -1- o 1 r, +�tJ�-�v�� -�-�� t 4AJ i `56l t -65c a C l7Q/ 14. " Q 'L4i — -2h1V.6a/ 15. 16. PD{ZhP1,J 17. 18.e�,� )„ ,--5\s • I/r,.; ` 44.4i ,1, I;l LLL r-`t l `DA(. G / UOob, cIa If r`. ( 1 Ptt_i! r (c;.(2) FcJ _(w ..6.. 2�(1 ja- �sz� ?4, r J/ . 7 chi ThcLA L_ moe .e f :1,n ' 4a � e/vQ c93ew a0y %arbftoo,- At) i We the undersigned support the recommendations and prioritization for. Glenvar Middle and. High Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated March 17, 1997. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations for additions and renovations at these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Board to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that Glenvar Middle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Print Name Resident 3. 6 'T.c),-/-� 8. IA 9. ►�. io.(r) 13. &\3.r.Ze, ryA c. Address (House #, Street, City) .eL2lz• 1504/tft9/ L!ka_ Cu- 6' 4,2167 57 vie / 7�8 /1 (ti0�; r �. ? �� ZQ it Crc l/wca` ( /a z o N.. . l�i`L ��� oZG 7L r . /. �`' 64 /4 55e 11 P. Mu��/ r e ndc; G.%, i/,, /C./3 /�1� /CS.l Sit , ?3 3 5 _f d G u 5 "1/�r iXcAlnq LA (o ff O l ve-i- - l;Jef% ,,Rol 541 n 4 c- J pi/0 � 1 �i h!/ i /, z. 18.,)C-y�'r 19. 20. �4 CJ. - f?Z A--\-)`tE)(� /11,e.11a0 57 11U G/� /"//t�� i/ �xr C _ E n-.: (‘t I\ ) , ' We the undersigned support the recommendations and prioritization for Glenvar Middle and High Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated March 17, 1997. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations for additions and renovations at these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Board to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that Glenvar Middle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Print Name Address Resident (House#, Street, City) 1. 77- n /v. z� h in P et e 33IST Lac,•'s ^ (;yz•✓t 2 '' �G Lr� �I.IL, - l' ra \"J .iI L//2 2 ZA 3. LOLI /4.1,11 C141 - .7? 4 -I-az:al 7-/-1-2,47: Z. 5. ' 0,_cp - :N drd l . c, c/ * _ 7. , Gam. 1/JcLck0 9. - n j-, • 2 10, R , nct !Li �1IYQ r,/slrr,,n/ .37 _,u p-/ e/✓ci .54/QN71 i 11 Gc�w e _ u% cL) R2. i.I e.. od a n Oz yY, avu n 11 f) 12. (/L� Uu. (� j 6(,U 0 0 0 3 a.1:1 ib1 G w(ti' S / > r 13. 2-L/t~/3' -14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. We the undersigned support -the recommendations and prioritization for Glenvar Middle and High Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated March 17, 1997. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations foradditions and renovations at these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Board to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that Glenvar Middle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Resident (Print name on line below signature) Resident Address (House No_& Street Name and City/Town) 1. / / ? -1,Jr -5.S7 /n u -5f ( a ,4 14., 2. `�; .7 /�94 SL - ,c:. //,, ; . / / t/V)--;")-1� /CC � +/11ict`.F.C.� f7 l ./ c1- rr/ *Q C '1 C 22hy 7 4- Cree kS id, Or De b,-)ro ^_, Ki ee k-) Gt l -p m , V A q I - 4. -5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. -12. 13. 51, We the undersigned support the recommendations and prioritization for Glenvar Middle and High Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated March 17,1997. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations for additions and renovations at these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Board to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations -so that Glenvar Middle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Print Name Address (House #, Street, City) Resident 1 2. 3. 4. 5. .2.) -- 6: /'t,2, 7. 9�a.,,/fZ,1,-,.G' 8. fhs 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 23. 24. 25. J /?R [ey�cc ;u �1ay cK.y M`1 I 6. e W i> i it e cJ X70 •5,4LL/97 26H5 lei" iLp_-�113nDA pc 6' Gym GrCe�,l�wo:, ef Pre 33 I.7- ,c�i« � ID- 1-7c1s-- R►�.j�,,� Nc ))s ti/4 & c P pry, We the undersigned support the recommendations and prioritization- for- Glenvar Middle and High Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated March 17, 1997. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations for additions and renovations at these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Board to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that Glenvar Middle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independent- facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Print Name Resident Address (House #, Street, City) 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 7)(Pj' us` 7- s 73 J/obf«wEKE 10. 11. 12. -13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 23. 24. 25. We the undersigned support the recommendations and prioritization -for Glenvar Middle and High Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated March 17, 1997. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations for additions and renovations at -these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Board to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that Glenvar Middle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Print Name Resident Address (House #, Street, City) 2. ►.� �' ' ,-� �' e Gsorqe, tiii oleQnier Cirt,Ie_ t- 5. , C /7Y R1,` ‘7 of• 5f.1 AeA2O 6. :J Lia ii'c c e_( G(% wt e r 55 �7 ' Dee - E v% /)v d yv it 7. �C , � �, �°v 4/2; e 47 /'//a62 z 7 i3 .4 lb�P,, ,Q,„k,„ ,, yo„1 3. „-v- 18.1%-,�� 19 L 9J.2 �J//� /i187-- -z- O/de /a ue rv: e.J. /U• . ow0 I / ES7T5 5T•N ?t-l0t"t & 4o(d \c br. .1 F t Y A_ \.ar,..A .1 ' 11 K OI GSH,' L.t.. �(t [C 1 L- Kirk /Y) scA mh_ �. . Al art 7isAn-Pr s lit N ��- s «4J'- 2J !1 7 t41 S o --1.,, n2- Si Secs-+� 20. �u i�,cU.Ef (,Cvur-��G \e t&Lt (1)I/14-(-r�� e � Kenbv-ic - ?c- 24w- 21. �� J 22. 23. 24. 25. We the undersigned support the recommendations and prioritization- for Glenvar Middle and High Schools as statedin the Blue Ribbon- Reportdated March 17 199T. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations for additions and renovations at these schools as endorsed: by the Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask. the School Board to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed_ immediately with additions and renovations so that- Glenvar Middle School and. Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independentfacilities.. Signature of Roanoke County Print Name Address Resident (House #, Street .City) 1. Ar ,�14n2o 5 .213 b )geJd o ri 7r Z‘4 le r" VY 5usa/7AnJle 14C', r(11 Fu ID vvS -D234 nyAl moo/ /e-L,45 aIS l,�1,ll/ crgy .2/3 �rtua lr,,/ ?k 1O6 c),Za Ola1It( ,nri - le gz Giej _7 Past P1 zit l/19 ?(6 / atlol 5 - lC1�( me r � 1- 1.3 6 (,.t-u STi1\ i `a1a/L 10.. , , _ 4_,.,.,.,IF,091/ .S,1 Lq.4—S7- 24 (, 11. J 1-4.- --, 1 -kr.,--c, .-Go,c,, ,0r.), AA Atic l 12: $L el-- Thvi o . et- S3 .e. & 4 ti,,r, Z� of 1 ft . P► a r -E.. •i IN, 11 f at C. 2. 1 �. . • _�__- � �N �-- 3 `il 11-vand -ra: I; �, � y ^ L ; - tc, -4- C21.4. rin, nit 17 ,, ' C,`,4 17 no L, i• +� icy re n. 18. . , k LL&._.laJcrn 5-t-epran ►e C— rat,a m 1 as \ t-s tcs St- esel N o i 19. / Cr6.\� Drno_rv('‘fa� 1 11(nq.'kcJ5r-cCc-Si °DC- (RC ,-; ?0.. l ,G;•Y.1 o_.,di11..1 J, I eJ ti V �t_rr.�tE21. a//-G- W oR - rr4rii1- (Joe[1 1.0gb(OMA2,3Akiii,(14- 22.A lite (Ai aiie idth 66VO aJevi le - Al .?((elF 23. /) I c0-;1' 716w_bi-;Jh 7a1._ i i 11( (7 i i •L ,� ���ac) ut( .ASe t.4- zyc/y -We:the- undersigned support -the- recommendations and: prioritization forGlenvar Middle: andA'igh Schools as•stated; in the:Blue-Ribbon Report datedMarch_ lT, 1997: We likewise -support Kinsey Shane's recommendations foradditions and renovations at these schools as endorsed by the- Blue• Ribbon Committee: We -ask the - School Board to seek.funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with- additions and renovations so that GlenvarMiddle School and GlenvarHigh School'may operate as fully functional, independent facilities_ Signature of Roanoke County Resident (Print name on line below signature) ResidentAddress- (House No- Sr. Street Name - and CitylTown) C C Ps-f J t ., (Th,. c, ' n C_.---C....„.„3 G1 V Ct o' kO %- %7_1)17i", / (rl`_ :4/)/ %iv-1., 1 / d - /, j7 --i C1. '7 , 3. 4. 5.. 6. 7. 8.. 9. 10. 11. 12 13. We the undersigned support the recommendations andprioritization for- Glenvar Middle and High Schools -as stated: in the- Blue Ribbon -Report dated March 17, 1997: We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations for additions andrenovations atthese schools as endorsed by the -Blue Ribbon Committee;, We -ask. the -School Board to seekfunding and.. the Board of Supervisors to approve funding: to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that- Glenvar Middle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional,.independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Print Name Address Resident (House #; Street; City) /14ietieue,f, Mckce 5500 /r✓ A2 R , 0,4 J r 3u 4)(/O/QClair" Ave R c 4. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13.. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 23. 24. 25. • We theundersigned=support.the-recommendations- and -prioritization for Glenvar Middle and. High Schools- as -stated in- the BlueRibborr Report dated March 1T, 1997 We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations for - additions and renovations atthese schools as endorsedby the Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Board to seek funding -and the Board of Supervisors -to approve finding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that Glenvar Middle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Print Name Resident 1- 'Theg.2 /_pd Address (House #; Street, City) -� l a1ttr 41-rre. -i-3<,'r J /2/ 1 �,./ �4c� r D c v / .,.;1 13 / 10. �/ln�Y l /1 M�tJ G ( r ), e, TeA evl �� `)-3 ; e 1 / 1>s ,` u C ti 11.. 1 J h�--a_-� c ` }N; 7 /� C f tv)rW, , (,.11 4 / l e^r5- cp , u c,14. 13 QUA) Rr f 16. J J u f_' /�o OR E. 17. 18. 19. 20. // ., 71. 22.; 25. .icy ri? e/S?' /' , 7/ 3 R ,L o„ L) 3 Ar2ss >91/ F . /1)C.. /l- d::4.) ciOIV NI a. 1 wl,\ Dr, Ka_ (7/44exii- 17 .557c; Ccuc/f .5— 2__c-7-c;. rr.. n Jl\ J�ylq S5'/9 We: the- undersignedsupport the-- recommendations: and prioritization- for Glenvar- Middle and_}Ugh Schools as stated_ is the -Blue Ribbon. Report dated March 17 1997 We likewise- support- Kinsey Shane's recommendations foradditions and renovations atthese-schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Board to seek funding and. the Board_ of 'Supervisors to approve -funding to proceed immediately with- additions and. renovations so that GlenvarMiddle. School and GlenvarHigh School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. - Signature of Roanoke County Resident (Print name on line below side) ResidentAddress (House No.. &-Street Name - and City/Town) 1. j' P-- , . 035 6GVc loci/ a-, Ve I1\ 1 I p ii c;C14.1c�--P I/ 2.. , R-L-tu -�,4-C _ 4+ ., ^ %{' ,-•!,^ . J ;y�'7-"�7 1�� � 3:. i i4Z 4.;u. y/�_-,,,uyv- 41-C; 0 / 4. 7,;(IC)iLw/ //t/'%G .4.^2(..,; .g.'%•:: /i .:f/ RD. i,v, L.4), 73,-;i i�' 1-1iJ /1,, i- / f;7 i,. / tl J ,)/7(_)/,: . '/ , --:?.mA1 6.. _i... _ c u6. / P 1.� i GI ") Jo 1 0 -s P 1C' ^ P , 8. :,u,, CIr.,7 -`' ' o'. -{--J,ljh s T r -.�(. ,-' 10. 4.,,,,,, IA, / b cx�t, j/' W 11. \-a ,,: cc ci q '.(.-'` 12. \i`\,l.'L., 1,.- 7 `.-�.-. L�1 -\\Zl`_ 0,.4.N z'�-i 13. We: the- unders' PPorttbe= igned:sa tecormnendationcand Middle and Hlgh°gchools-as-stated_ irrtheBlue�Ribbon-peoon forGlenvar 199T. We- L7aewisesupport KinsShane's-recommendations , : RePortdated-MH�h-17; , renovations at�these : schools as -endorsed. seed: by the -Blue ue Ribbon School Board to seek fundingbon Committee:. We and the -Board: of Supervisors to a ask the Proceed: immediately whir additions and approve- funding to and Glenvar renovations -so that -School High- School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities:. Signature of Roanoke County Resident Resident (Print name on line below-signature)Addtess (Aonse Na 8c Street Name - and . City/Town) We -the undersismedJsupport the recommendations; and. prioritization+forGlenvar• M'addleandJ4tgi'S-chools-as;stated: in=the Blue°RibboaReportdated;Marclu17;. 199T. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations .foradditions and_ renovations attheseschools as endorsed -by the-BlueR.ibbon-Committee:_ We -ask the - School Board." to seek. funding. and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and: renovations so thatGlenvar-Middle School and GlenvarHigir School may operate as -fully functional, independent facilities._ Signature of Roanoke County Resident (Print name on line below signature) Resident Address (House No.. & Street Name- and.City/Town) 1. _ %/4e 4,Z , 27 - C -/ Y-S/ Z-ZI Z174,4« /4�?/� f(APii IL) ,i , PAZc-' in /41 Z. 4 i t'A c� Stk cr �1 /4/ _ C1u.L (�4�t( / ,i . y 3. .�i_` A kA___ I Z /4 3 _S en ' //1,"/ 1 S r Ravi eI S, nit' ller 4.. °.,<,6., .ems �(1�� (l.�-e� a ' 'i' 3 <S, .Y u: I ( 1 Y. j/ s:. 1,t, - -� ,-, , / / at . 1, 6. geg /1 // ii ‘.. 7:. *` , ha/#46pz20,----_,04, (zb..- d 'is-3 8. 4L/ /72 Li/ u 2/ d7 )--La vc /hill Z ri vt. , 5(1ez17 f1A Z(i>i 3 11r s - 6 -u-u' JCS- cz.a., ca.e9-e I 10.. <<ar> 0 ,-, / //� 1 1, _, 1 / / S` 7 1/»// L 1)14' f 11.. / .L -�� _ 1 Cv 7 l .F )1. 12. �..i.“u•,,, �4,____ > I /7/ /;-,e-s,•r/i/47. 13. h1rL1 t m -t_7-..n C 1t; S' r , ncOn_L i 4 .11i.. J ✓ I We_the undersigned. supportthe recommendationan and: prioritizatiomforGleavac MTddle°:andHigIrSchools.as= stated: i rthe:Blue_RibbomReportdated±Marcict7; 1997:- We -likewise supportKh sey-Shane's recommeadatt0 =for additions- and: renovations atthese schools -as -endorsed by the Blue -Ribbon- Committee:.- Weaskthe- School Board to seek funding, and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed. immediately with additions and renovations so that GlenvarMiddle-School and GlenvarHigh School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities.. Signature of Roanoke. County Resident (print name on line below signature) Resident Address (HouseNo. & StreetName and City/Town) L. r aAtk kh Q t 1 0? l 41 RfLia_i,-o r -rt-n k br- I IN T 2 A WA -I t- ��n 1,0�-,�, Yl� t D/', tL , /1' 1 r ( f V ! 1�:.-t- f,u-\ - V A— / J f. ; (.4 2j 7 J (/ \ „-- 7 ,_ eti.c1 k_At` r 974c tin- r=,_,-t, Cr, (-, 1c.tv1 4., /jj .�� i r'n+; 2 .C..-tc1 �1�` 7 / ' / /-!i e/,S ! �A`,A7/ ci „ _if j�L�-ram ;7/c�'7 %%, - W6:5 5. ? ,LCL,- ' j t(S4n(_ R 37 /).L .`i& ('ti4-X Q _(,) -�-' /./ - 9�`�� S VA a'17 53 T. 8. 9--., 10- 11. 12- 13. t We the undersigned: support the recommendations and prioritization for Glenvar ?Addle and High Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated March 17', 1997. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations for additions and renovations at these -schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Board to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions andrenovations so that Glenvar Middle School and GlenvarHigh School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Resident (Print name on line below signature) Resident Address (House No. & StreetName and City/Town) 1. ;/-1--e.-° - .,11.4k._ Ill/ GLi lt‘___ 'ICL•,C 1,j1� },r 1� l SQ\nn` �U 0 2 u I 2: . ycpl` 3L u.Ae& - 1ga) (ems ) I -Nr _ 1 S _ �' A 2 (1--S3 / ;6 t� ipg.- JIJrn, wv ' 1 / 7";) 7 / I -y� , i l Pc) n� ct /s75 0/ U .4. -. 6. -7. 8. 9. 10. 1. .. 12. 13. Tonp.pp y We the undersigned.supportthe recommendations and prioriti79tion for Glenvar Middle and High Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated March 17, 1997. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations for additions and renovations at these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Board to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions :andrenovations so that Glenvar Middle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Resident (Print name on line below signature) Resident Address (House No. & Street Name and City/Town) 1. .�• %Wit/n-,----- 51i c--) <t.‹, y 1r? /7 / tizi,i/d-= X ri14&-tsivi _ s.a-iL ->,., 4 _7y, ' ' 2: t� 2A ,-.—�3 .-.,3- �, (S 5Nk..*, \( 4 a\-k' 5 3 • 3. ,.t_fit .... ( ✓1.JJLGvvw;. , 451-t 6/ if +w PAkt LX 4/& 4. OZ 1i�`� w�-G ,,‘-i 7,57.-` 5. &_— 6. , xt..-: i S 3 C fr ol /2, 9.f., Cam-.-- G- 7. ' CalLci '6( . j-kk.. .5a_i.(..1-vt._ ,, VA- s. � � / Pa.,l, 1- awn K Poi, 6-,-; , //g ol. . >L24.;,.z.� 9. /)iiaJ L zf-c 'J ( -, 1,. , S,-[ yis S - 10. ._. 0.,._._ `{3 I 1L,:,-_-/-„ !),/ __, - '.` i t- O '` -. _ GYs-3'' 5) 5,�-- /7- 1 • 1 ` Ce; n ) , { as Cowv. G,'r-c_.¢g- 5ctk, k 1/A aLif 53 t• We the undersigned support the recommendations and prioritization for Glenvar Middle and High Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated March 17;, 1997. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations for additions and renovations at these schools as endorsed by the -Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Board to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that Glenvar Middle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Resident (Print name on line below signature) Resident Address (HouseNo..& StreetName and City/own) 1. -60,,L. „ 0 . Z,c,ti0"'- I ✓j q / 4 : 11 tor ; c� w .E.ifd . r14- A. @ c Ie ,ie,,.., V,. . j Q47153 2: .cri Ord Saai--)' - I g L'i iVt; } (ci,y_ Td Aar, .% _, Ca I r ,1 1 Ve 04- J.3 3. I , �-� ' /�/ /.� s` ��---- _ / `i/5 �' j //�/ir > e' -� t►i `rGi , , _ ur 3ALEM VA 4. `k.Gl i kJ �ftft.n/ st- `' _ 1. ` ' E= i tt n er I g s 1) MI 1 i'A nd i F.M_ $.ALEM \/1\ a5: }-C.,.. ' .. i>._,42,------------Mo V 41,-1 .4,7,- '1-(-t0 r ,-(,,,, , 7 4 i%a- r l 9U 1 �'f,..,•. 6. ._.;•A C r'-•,,.-J i"7°! iq r LL.' , - 2i� k:>01..t .F :Ac_c-' /.,,;,,A, V =u, - -, Q/ %v7 / //.,�.1-D (r-cc1 c-u / d Sr 1. r.fit 8. , 76 A (l �,-7 ./ r cA/ c4 //a,,,,. 9. th6 JA;IIb/;Aqe R. , 10. _ 4 0Lp7 ,$ / D Y % 'il -zg- �.�- J '�. 11. C,I-,aJri te r--' 1 I n q OI C ,c<z ,(l I br. c- L.Q, IA; Ltz u.--- 7 _ci A s I c� GI (7sy YVti t.1.) , . Sa .z' 12. , [ /7k L ►,/.i 1 `tD 5 (quap,.`NJ( )r 13: ~ii ;i (1,Q- n , L`t t ; m (k�- 1 I (c .5 y 1 (( r' X, 0,�G�'z.�,- z'- v. c support the recommendations and prioritization for Cleaver We the undersigned supp Report dated March 17, 1Visddle and Sigh Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon additions and 1997. We likewise support Kinsey We ask the renovations at these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. School Board to Seekfunding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that Glenvar 11/fiddle School and GlenvarI3igh School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Resident (Print name on line below sib) 11. Resident Address (House No. & Street Name and City/Town) • We the undersignedsupport the reconunendations and prioritixa Glenvar Middle and High Schools as stated_ in the. Blue Ribbon March 17, 1997. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommen additions and renovations at these schools as endorsed by the Blut Committee. We ask the School Board to seek funding and the Bo Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with add' renovations so that Glenvar Middle School and Glenvar High Sch operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Print Name Address Resident (House#, Street, City) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. g)zik,u, U'.C.G2=~ 6. /A/7 / A/M ////,1)01� 12. 1� 13 ..A 14.L 16. 4i 17. v . ' ✓11 1j 19- grAL 20. ,// — So 2.1. Sa %c f can Icy �-_. -eriGu �isk ft 4 G,vin<TT - 22. •mac( t, ' 6.r1-Dc�.. t , c .t 23.-�� 24. ct'\%2D \ \ We the undersigned supportthe recommendations and prioritization -for Glenvar Middle and High Schools as stated in the Blue Ribborr Reportdated March 17;1997. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations for additions and renovations at these schools as endorsed by the -Blue -Ribbon Committee. Weask the School Board to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed inunediately with additions and renovations so that Glenvar Middle School and Glenvar High School may operate 'as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Print Name Address Resident (House#, Street, City) 17) )�/d��� ills 2 6 7 9. � �J 10. ) p '1. A ill'.._ [ ,f-h 0/ / /E,4�/. / Z(-1-7"i2� ._ , %'�Gd� /)/ /o tt) --7- ,, 11. !� ' . -__- 'IL C 7-- - Ft Li �r 7Lvra „Z7oc�-�, Z4�(J% 12. ' `oc.4..— -- 5372 Ms'.7 ,1,1 dc Z a /,C 13. i .s ','� Toot:.: EwC A .$ . e, .1 yv`'/_ r jetA, k /2 - , ro, n '� Eze F ' /' 6C/d64 .z__ ('ara .Do,7<<tdvsiLF l y/yt1/ , •. i j 1 ?0a in .S 1. �i�5 , I— 1�. / 1 16; 4 i 1 17. %i/Q,e., d'—'y- �''{/ 'aL -----) 7 -/J�(" 'elf ``/ - .,„4-c. Z74' 53 18.;,- 19. /:/�/ ri-- a/_ C7 7;o,N„re-4/ 1 ,li.r-/,// , L e- 20.V y- y �/< R<110lf 2.1. 22. 23. 24. 25. We the undersigned:support-the recommendations and prioritization for Glenvar Middle and High Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated March 17, 1997. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations for additions and renovations at -these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Board to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that Glenvar Middle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Print Name Address Resident (House #, Street, City) 1. (Q,..T-ehble S_ C/4)/- . 1'L)-f iO4 2. t; i , lifioo, b. i l.'2 '&4 1 Lr4re Fr� (1646 i . , al _Qt( Iecan Germs q . . 5Co1 % P, / 399 Afe lor7 11/rwi96,- iL i d 8.,�.c-t �a L c W? 9. y; i(4 10. ( -- ,R,e1 4-,t1 12. ,-mot /tf 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. Z /fla -shell, QnQ _a- , d \•n i olck y ,LN n P SG I P fr. c el ►13 yv_. 3q3c 1?1,-- 32c �vK S/- rdiLre, 7r 24%L.►-1 20. ?1. 22. 23. 24. 25. We the undersigned support the recommendations and prioritization for Glenvar Middle and High Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated March 17, 1997. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations for additions and renovations at these schools as endorsed by the Blue- Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Board to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that Glenvar Middle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Print Name Resident 1 3r 5. 6. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. ' 20.� .2 1. 22. 23. 24. 25. ►1 i‘tor1 pP ,.,TC.t_ PA.? (Z C.('Q r. 1 Lt 2n•kti Address (House #, Street City) Jahn Pomtrn (I03 l k e Jay e;rt1e, the la 2- z ' 30c 2) CoveciPaC CecIP,53k", Tz /y3, 4rt /�. 1.1 1'1 A t u,6g�. 196 D) Sk EPic__1/, kt411 ,2J)419 mtu- „1 i h) Flo 1 or70 G'sLQ,4JLd ?�4 . Qer-� k361 Czl \ohv�5or. ��� iT\Cee\ acle sbT43-A a ola 3 G IL)) lc) w60,4 exL 4/W-vten. �'- C- 91 A We the undersigned support the recommendations and prioritization fte - Glenvar Middle and High Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated march 17; 1997. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations foraddititnns and renovations at these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Committee_ We ask the School Board to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve 3unding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that GlenvarNVhddle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independentacilities. Signature of Roanoke County Resident (Print name on line below sure) Resident Addr ss (Souse N o.. & Stree cName and City/Town) 1. LL£M 0 , . 522 Surdaric ,_ 60. _ 'can 1/114 /3 3 L (- 0� 2. '.iJ 21 B I oei-)- rtal- o4 Pn TY r) '. ( oo E_ 1 f n-\ • rG- ow L - 3. C . -L- '7'7 k 2A1 2 / '7 P . l . ra- A- �`,i 6t..rK 'iJ ec -ZK ,2'-- 3 p_12/4- 5. ,--% •' i. Feu )4I.% 3 5t f';:�, c v; J��i �.ti�` i (.3 v P I I, �DuiL��i f i ("FS'cc�CI `fi Cr, \.::_Lll 6. 6-� tix ti--Exi)SCcL^^ /: (-._ ii5 S S I?'/t4; “. ve_ -,:,- -t,,r k z u/sue 4 030 S{ N n/ 8 ✓ 2 `�. ° re- 1-4' ' -'/ ' ' /%7,1, '4477? ; G1 U l `' 21 r;-7 _ ,)771 / 10. A. d-Fr.2 ,t i;e:),), .? J ; z o 7 ) w /,) fia 11. /6725 i)--/, ,06--r-/. do.7,b / ,CA 2101_ -W. /46n,46„, zc}/� �r/1, L46 iY7/ r- 1 12. }2) /' , P1 �--^ / 7/LC9itZto, Z, L• 19 .fri..40��..-Afou/ 5¢L1>-f .V, - Z11.73 13. 1 A a R -? ,1c ti,-/ - - A, I 1 b / . - cl _ ��--,o ,...,____ — I Sct.t.e vA Q 4 I ._s We the undersigned support the recommendations and prioritization for Glenvar Middle and High Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated March 17, 1997. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations for additions and renovations at these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Board to seek fundingand the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that Glenvar Middle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Print Name Address Resident 5. 6.I�� 7. 1 8., 9. 10. V/ (House #, Street, City) ///_.4.1) l'‘/r7/ 4,7/ j�CJ.CY� Pr 1�{ 5a7 3 C le.na.r c -p (1 �r (f ` (raac' Sc J s I)I Y� _ if ( v / l� /T-Pies l��,i/.6 11. AO,l 12. �71:1 13. 14 15.-h� • L)5,4 CVS .u, /t/LL/O Aoul G %/%%- '0/77&,1 „' ` C',/J rA// / T _5,4 --;/7 y 6a (c --v 2,5 � r -r �X df'T r? i7; , u2A.�•s 1' imr (r 1-17) ;s Aeite,g- ,' c o/•vsoj 57/79 -S%o rta D,(? ,5.4e-G"i, t% 176,5 e;(-1-% I..r4•, ,l 1 .1 Cs a, S , 7_ 2-( f -6)oK- (D2, �� We the undersigned support the recommendations -and prioritization for Glenvar Middle and High Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated March 17, 1997: We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations foradditions and renovations at these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Board to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that Glenvar Middle School and Glenvar High School may operateas fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Resident (Print name on line below signature) Resident Address (House No. & Street Name and City/Town) 1. : LID LI CQM/ J 5844 .D o (Li cod f4ve, E Elaine CArr ,501-em VA- 0L4JS3 2. ' 771 i?% , 47 9 6 ,J J id Sakw , Uv ✓ r, h4 4 ,. 5- A I P,r►�� A _. 1 . .A 1,u-Li 624 +�/�_V lV J 1 . '�y!Gr l in- / / c/ 'p_i:l p '/ rrr1 PS-il n Sa4i- Vs_ 4. %e,--fe./ 1!Lc2 7 ',Ii ‹, , .Ja.A -c L. kr,- -`- F FP' P Li '' o K-e4Z 514j-/ vG 2 `t7 c � .— 5.- .1 �� 404C- i\(-(16\, r: ., (Z.d Sh1QtVJTJ4, .ems . N 4v1/44) S k car; 4 cU S frig, U 6. `)4-voy.N.. a (it\ .. ,.. %. S i`c..3 Slf\c ; (Lc\, S A4.0,, 7. 'N',r.r,tg•sis.. cc\,.",.c0r.►' S. c v P 4 . CI C 1'- t� 'J)`\-�� �4i..), , 4.3 . 4/.0 va _0. )'� -- 11 9. '1`7U--a/ '/ / ' '3U C/( /' Lam' . y �, Powit[ �ALFel, d, zV/ 3 f fi r7A'i.8ii1 eirr / 7? 5i1r—I l >^i_iv •l1 _ ,iaJ -n'° ,q- c 11. TI?. sisVi v 6:4 7J.) ..-' s79 2 e ,,, /11 0.7//..5 12. . 1Ac? ll", L-yti , I '8 1 S t r i-, e vs` , I oc...-?-)1F. I. n el €._-../ 3a1e4",— t) e,.. ...._ q ( ,c-z----i 13. u• f I .2 i l i ic4; - L 4. ,.titv. -111) Sin e.c,ci.Q&J7 V//l 2.- / 5.3 We the undersigned support the recommendations and prioritization for Glenvar Middle and High Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated March 17, 1997. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's' recommendations for .additions and renovations at these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Board to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that Glenvar Middle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Resident (print name on line below signature) Resident Address (House No. & Street Name and City/Town) 1. • b 0$5w'-wc'CO , Pi CH 5A%. n, r-a S3 2. / '' l (Q SO in i ! ! br• I , - ji,-L,•_„_ co ll een F A crne SGI(2_r,.., vA a(«3 3. 1 11$ 4. 2-)--) � 9-93 L . r•lift-LtL ,50-/em) li21 • 02-4, 3 3 5. .;k C� rrth x_i 1 3 1 r R 1 a O'C / 7Ii r-)h Rri .i S0,0\6 ca )'S _ ✓ 1 �l/v► V/9 7 /53 6. (Ac,•6cZ 0 '73 q ciltef2A gcr._0_ , ,L r st9 lot/ n Ofct- 1a— . 4f / s 3 7. J,,_, 4 ----N rQ_ t' 2v/ ? I/7,)-e i-ea r--1 r . i4h ‚- a-bav-o ,1 n cv n 9. 61.4.2r Igor, 3 a 4 .6Rd, ^U v orI�?, n 10. • ` '!�.• y\ Ju t U J , 5 o3 PPn u I n ➢r i ge4. oT u,t rc 11. ' I;7 rcl 1.i M 1 kx `LL(, •b r , .fir, �� . ,-�(1i' 3 1 lv)•4 I 3't'.4_ K I A 5 L J +. .00,1(> 6. ,''.•1 v 13. JQ 407 C-dEft/r- 7-74 wr,:s yi,, ,d .-/ I .S;dv/e -- 2 //<, We the undersigned supportthe recommendations and prioritization for Glenvar Middle and High Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated March 17, 1997. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations for additions and renovations at these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Board to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that Glenvar Middle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independentmfacilities. Signature of Roanoke County Resident (Print name on line below signature) Resident Address (House No. & Street Name and City/Town) 3vcq Qiq*.u3h; \Ja l (i Dr 1. Qfki.A._ Lk 2. ni iii) 3 ( ' v y.,-.3 \ 1 e Y er~! 3. e-/'r 4rit I � ck m Gl4 N� L L; a 1-L /Uk fr- , 5 /Q_,-► al � u 1 S--.3%. 4. a ./7 �-rs,4- Le 1CLic-c LPU c 4 4:-pq -r74 !ilL1 _ \Ik a4/ 5. Ular ,T, /.Yk VA,..k 3 6 07 aPiNcitk l-e r, 7a-,- 1. �-.c.&__ � sr � _Scd. . c _ 2L1 I � --. 6. Iy;,,\ ' ` `` ` ` __ � 7 • -�u 7. �z--t��{P, 'E1 - \3rIck ' Cvcu ie� R.A . ' U. t Lc, . ,a,41�3 - C\ Q 8. 613 „.., a iov26 z -L-z_ /71--# 9. La 1. ' ;_i_ `P< 4)k / , 7'5,- r> (% ,(n T%, _,, X1,,; I) f�irtf1. �r)-+1 r,(,5c� ( (., 10. kt o� (6)_� 1L / 3syi ,Qc?NNCTi S,,OP//-[9.5 A'o( y „ \1� .,.a �.'ti - i,-S 3 `4 �' O„.Q S( 1 V-e, a,, C ' Prc A ` r 1 ,ve 1: Lf fSLic, Of N-1_,Lo C../ 0 iAl _„4:6 Q21f'Vi VA c I53 13. A /rnti, 2 _ t t1P r14 - y ( ko( - c—, G;,. (5)) <,A We the undersigned support the recommendations and prioritization for Glenvar Middle and High Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated March 17, 1997. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations for additions and, renovations at these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Board to seek finding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that Glenvar Middle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Resident (Print name on line below signature) Resident Address (House No.. & Street Name and City/Town) 1. P7"?.--tom ' _5/e/c./ ,fie/% sr u u s-r� - A'14/5/1`7 S�-`&-`' , Vi . Z-�kf 3 2. r , S'4ie pin v P4 ? Yir3 C CJi e ,- 4-tk,N,5 3. / %/1f-C �.r)4 S -7-� G 4-17 �5 c iarxor l-i ► L.=._ i) re. 4. ,, a gea a2..k C. V G-- S S US A-c\9 Q)c->o e..S Sculsvm X 0, U �S 5. fr, a. - if� Z�5S wILJ✓OOD Al 4ii (-'4,0,4y c„e&-wiffs-g 9ii-try,/ , 6. rlex7, ,1 a24/il i r!'A,"r (; r _c .e ZvONE` --59/UA �Ll>.7. k_e 41Y1 6 a IWX G � D A,/e, FI/c,AnCiS ,S, , n rlerr-) I c)(O/S3 8._ -- e/-��� �_. : \�._ -) cl, , yt 9. QIQL,tt i?, 5 4 14_h. 1)(i. '9 / I c) 3 , 5AJ.€i'v. 1)/4. C-)-i/-5---3 10. un &P'C.ih 380.SUnbre CCir./1-pl o van o4 11. so ' zu � -9T; t,Q /-/ (I Q t"4) . C am. L c..r'a_ 12. --i � cox H�11 0� e,j Et \. ���4C$., .� 1`sc�s _13. ; 1;,r-) SORV\2 .., ._ OP 01 riSs &OS fv) A 1..,....1 1‘...___a_a_. -24 We the undersigned support the recommendations and prioritization for Glenvar Middle and High Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated March 17,1997. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations for additions and renovations at these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Board to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that Glenvar Middle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Print Name Address (House #, Street, City) Resident 4. l 1�',C d r V y- V ///)/..Sa/ fV<j ,/'"t ato_ s, L., g73 3 reiNteri,,04 4 . \./4 2/j// 16. 17. 18. 19. • 20. 2 tL, fr 21 22. 3. 24. (1(/ t.f, 25. �h (k, rkt ( c ^\c, I) i1L' . 2 A2 k LE-F;w ; c -/ c-1 /Dc Nam ; I to y� g4 i'&Z'' 4 G12) l � 5 5 ra`�r< ;ter 4 S4 --&1/'-1 s _ JC�rn�� tLJ� etc( i 01r..chaJ.r1 4l 5 4 7 L7. rs 2,'s`I1 S, Ierfc'f i)3 :(erg,: SAC r i L • / y`f� �irr<., �f'�(,/�• L } � n1 S Z7 T < +�� r -0O,4 7� sje.c,„\ i4- `2(21 G l it r r 59/( Sttikc &ta,i . /u�i qE v-Da, M caz.j-- a.) zl ` 4 l 6,44'(2e -I-27,v • /4 `G 1so\ U, 5L/j 6 /o Z S-1 r\hc .4It I Lk-4j n1kiy*c /as;c Sc.L'tf 1 al AO 561, OldeAti-0,/ We the undersigned support the recommendations and prioritization for Glenvar Middle and High Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated. March 17, 1997. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations for additions and renovations at these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Board to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that Glenvar Middle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. 2. 4. • Signature of Roanoke County Resident (Print name on line below signature) y „u_dc (4r*„/,:Ii;✓ 4i,, c• / / Resident Address (House No.. & Street Name and City,/Town) f 1 L.I,4c c�.J f ti Li .5534„/ /4', ! / r . G S Cu y.%• t: 1/ %'' cr / ! r '1 / 10. ( / 1 11. �.._ /- ! ;tz . y � j U L r�c,L;n t' Ay i7 if V\ ti I-'• G (-4/3 I G » h4)"1- C -c C r /J' -C t /" e-- 13. ix (1A,Lzes20,0, L33,57. N0 8;a ,9 We the undersigned support the recommendations and prioritization forGlenvar Middle andHigh- Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated: Marcir 17, 1997: We likewisesupportKinsey Shane's -recommendations foradditions and: renovations at these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the. School Board to seek funding- and the Board_ of Supervisors to approve- funding to proceedimmediately with additions and renovations so that GlenvarMiddle School and Gienvar I-Bgh School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Resident. (print name on line below signature) Resident Address (House No. & Street Name and City/Town) 1. ,i Aft/ 5/ /2(.,.v A 5 i! i L't/t f Yk t iv, iW � cO/L 1- -/l �ns'z(.lL-P -AtT AA)/ / 3 7'' 1 (� 1r01 c o e\, i'n•1Y\ ^ VY\ ( / i 3 . r %,L, Jti� 4 ,_Q ::.;e 7 / S 14 / (.0 /XI L) c l S i C 33i T T ,Sgc .T.A-1 �� 53 4. e rr� ,c4rr . LC- \ \-QC dk4m cL (nil `R . I 1 liar hC�� -CT 5. \c,, PI1Nr A \/ c.Pr, od %ar 2'r (-----Ali!, /[? .s 7L(/ tg,4-4/2,7 1 7. / ar c'L2'w- ' l ( CLti�,- -1) Q- a41 i` Ul ��94-kg ? ` _S5 i blgAJ ,..✓. C.I.L; oar ,,i ) 7C 8-/uLlic(L1 t ` �Z f/'C r. 1 ��� �L)`t"- Nav, 1'1 N,, . e_:, io / ("2 9., iraizinX.c e _ (o 4-55/Wu 1,abid'" /4c/ iV1/e l'i 41 J112-) l/4- 2 C4 7c/ . 10. 1 n,,,,.-..• 7)6c :- -2._ (: 3 G 3 y. _, ,j,e i 2; I ( -' am . r-s- r.;01- Crs \, ,. , rj 1,,, ,-y - Zk/ n 7O 11. _) t ( //ct.tiv 1 t ( a/a/tiQ (-g= LIC -1,---,_,)..t,..4.,. I, af ,N7k-i f 5: I /7Q ,LJ )1,1 r I,*ii / L! (c `I C /1 -'i (4-Ltu-" l t 17 ,-7.,-. ,Z...:, 1--, 13 S �1 0 icl C-t.- .,=, 13. �� - ',r' - ' I h!5',=/ 5. L.i /2. A)s4�T6e.-. ) J We the undersignedsupportthe recommendations and prioritization for-Glenvar Middle andHigh Schools- as• stated in the Blue-Ribbon-Report-dated:March.1T, 1997. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations foradditions and renovations at these -schools as endorsed by the. Blue Ribbon Committee. We. askthe School Board to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that GlenvarMiddle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Resident (Print name on line below signature) r.y Resident Address (House No. & Street Name and Clty/Town) 1. _ 18 Sim, rz t a rzct - sac.ta n V4. (.fi S 3 \i ,1, ' 1,i.-F,tiv1i,> >rz. Ho- H (,,4_ I(/ ,r,Ly-C. C ilc.;-,- kce- F+:II.s L - 3. jorie J Ai2:9 uA. .3-ry 1--+ , i `E l2- -i Le_A_z, E_. .r . V(o-1-)r SIGs, nc- S.C" l-.c4,-�1ru_.crx;1 e . 4 r• tn.P,.r.,G � _ "�,..51 A... -7'7 .4- -d24c.�.4 ` Q .,' , J C�%�. f \ a.4 10� .,- � v • ������ - }�) , •,„.S.(1`. y4,4 " s.) \:...,_- _ �44. 4 &--1 'Nit», VA N1 J J- fit- . , it diLa r.af 7 - -; c q €.1.L• t' ; < c' (VO 4.1• C r 6. _Mj_ �+ } f N �/ � 1,11 %L' 1 C� / ��� /L/e12.. �/ �l�'S � c1 C fi� ��.(I � Ci �.',•^ / finer' 5U.u...,. 7.. ( h d t.-j Lt.,t &-L) , ' k�_ tiA aQ.Q. iC 41,1 . _ LaS-&-C 8.(--,Avg V h) .0 , /- ,; ! -L- .( L 0 -i 9--.. &_,,f 2Y; n,...,/,,,,, .57,z Ai,,,,,„/24,,,L,,,.,_ s,..„2,4., t, . , ,..._, , 10. 6,-1(,,Lti.„( --- ,.;(dc. Li 1 l`1 DE C In o„ ,lp-- ,---:, , 11. ;)(%✓erg/?-.�/J,c V 1 jV' n r/4-;,(.:- % 1. 1. / \ /: , ) ( ^. \) (. `\ / h /. u \l Z-( JYt_ A �,„, 12. / 0 - ,ci U'. .S. /v We the undersigned support the recommendations and prioritization forGlenvar Muddle and High Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated. March 17; 1997: We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations foradditions and. renovations at these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Board to seek funding, and the Board. of Supervisors to approve fundingto proceed immediately with additions and renovations so thatGlenvarMiddle School and. GlenvarHigh School may operate as fully functional, indepenc ent facilities_ Signature of Roanoke County Resident (Print name on line below signature) Resident Address (House No. &. Street Name and City/Town) i.. 2:4Ndiv-tuS) 6 l-l= ' takkakio VJ) • is RCQvf . \Q.,,,- v), `,-(4i S-3 i )\--- 3: 2— L i 14 "--- `t'-6g m�s2A.,) , 1 4. C...) ;E.... 6- pc) S17Cv Zrc,Y.s(+.i -R() C,D g 1 i. -s-F(t u-. Of, Z Lr 1 .. 5. L uda ,e 3(ot o 4 74 . Sa,ee - b ..5" SJ7' v %'d — 4,i , / 7. 5. i 1. / ,no1 j173 ?,) ,Ja n _ ,,z . , ,/J 8. �M-- �.�/„ Y 4 3 0.4 . i , : 1 0 ) , St 1-0 itk a yiv_.3 9-. � ,-, 1LJ U.f I jc.),K, 4 n.. _sr %l (,,u A . j )c Li? 1 . irk 9cL/5 Iko lem 7..9(-1/ 11. \:: L 1—) s's'P LsL h„9— 12- 1 (a /, €-/ Ally ' ., 7 7 <-3 3 ,iL,r,,e1 -;,„) i i 13. a r , iin a. Si r (5-Tr;!,.. x 4 6- n i4-,k€ H i ,, J sa�,(,o, (11 2 4-153 We the undersigned support the recommendations and prioritization forGlenvar Middle and HighSchools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated-March-1T, 1997: We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations foradditions and. renovations at theseschools as endorsed by the Blue -Ribbon• Committee. We ask the School Board- to seekfunding and the Board of Supervisors to approve fundingto proceed, immediately with additions and renovations so that GlenvarMiddle School and Glenvar School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Resident (Print name on line below sure) Resident Address (House No.& Street Name - and City/Town) 1. iZ%G --,i ii. I, ,,'e 3 ,i Z- C `! la: i N j (J ;; ; 2040 R R ; cha - , oto er-i-S SA 671 /A- V-r (53 .132-,-.L424"`• 0 X .(--,_ X - -if,4 ,./4i. 'e,,,,,_ .- 7 r (L—tc. ,z,,kil %<-) . /f - v'jJ/ k3 y < el—,_L...4.cf.w Jd. 3; T L). 01.0: 34 (A R Rd . LLu c!(, . i kze c - � 346 9 SJL :, ( icy.._ 4. l/._ / e,‘:_.//G AJ '_p ` n I �e lit` S 'J t?u:s3 G- G' G -- 'ii 1-1- -- /' `" /VGv/l"77 /47', , i,/,/ - 3 7. 12r n I. SM 'T SDd''7 i'i, . iQr . ,� , i ;� j ,,x1,„-._ `; „_ ._,2 cG /C - 0 3-/ 8. i_ (,( Jj2/�� , iAz-- �.� � � t_ U/ _ CO tv E REL D 9. ,.) ,, ,_ni r CU r 3 7-Bicds 2) Rd ---?,(^IN,-)L- A11=x mze :fa:1cm. v1_4 Zi.53 10. -1.: ,.-,.-.,'\ `Pin _3 (1 d (ti--Zt t,a 6 n „ti..4An `111 m}Y1 S.)v, �j i e_frv,, C\ • Q l 51 1iivt � �: .,u_re—, t 1 1"• i ( ,\,;� ,:nq, jfi. t �.i,(ii lu"/'%�t (3 c (0 C , (-, •7T_�r'ir / .-1 / i)gi-( ti\1 _ F;^1167-1/ i dP im Vt.! ',�4i. 13. �,y , - 4.d '-, - . 1 ,, i) (-- r' We the undersigned support the: recommendations and. prioritization- forGlenvar Muddle- and High- Schools as stated in- the- Blue -Ribbon -Report dated.March-17; 1997: We- likewise -support Kinsey Shane's recommendations: foradditions and renovations at these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Board.to seek funding -and the -Board- of Supervisorsto approve- fundingto proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that-GlenvarMlddle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independent: facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Resident (print name on line below signature) Resident Address (House No. & Street Name and City/Town) 1. O.f 4A,0— _ -`/gL % Lc,/.r-r r✓ 1,, _ . //_h/gc,1S 5217- z(1/Js( 3 2 / /t ?`//& �`' i t , - k_J -4%_3a.Z ' 674 f_; -/, 1,C d Zi.tis,.t., Ji / ^ �`�J -,,,v, .d. J I t�� Cry .- 4 t o 1ci' sNci.�J z i wr•/ f f-,2----. 1 4,Kz- 5 i3_,P.0 ) <K4 c.,?"6_e-,K.,,,.. , 5. - 1 `f H--- iylo0re Pc c.12ry1 P Pl-r17114 4 •`71.1PV✓ ,, _,.vh4, ilk.al( 11S3 7. -'l1C4.1) ; u A , (29 Ne-A- S /0�66K)` 4 8. L. Pic S La -- 2- i 1S 7 ., ,L, , f, (.1) '"-7- y 10. I t=oif - L o c& - 2YS7 ' -k)(4-, Cm, - ice'' co; Lock -e:f cQ -r. V A. ?Li f ' 3 II. K c ._.�;z y --t C� '7 `I a ,, e\__\1 ' c-u1 p,„_, 1 . ,,,,, e,-,Th , q A . ,q_i 52 12. .J,,'L _ 1,6,6Q . ,-. S'bid' adf . ba Zo Iefe Gvft-e___ le..rn V•a a-4) 3 13. We the undersigned supportthe-recommendations and_ prioritization- for Glenvar Middle- and' High Schools as stated in the -Blue -Ribbon -Report dated March 17; 1997: We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations for additions and renovations at these schools as endorsed. by the Blue- Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Board to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that Glenvar Middle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Print Name Resident Address (House #, Street; City) 1. � s ree-PLowe 53yq keg' i CG.) WU( 11,Vk Ui-Z1-0) Z� 2 Ctr���. ��a2Nii6C •�-.� .kark Fianne &n 1434 -60.-tcsha� , SaLe..i-tIVA zy053 3. 6-4 ; 4. • AID � • - QrnPsa� a.L' 1r�a4 u) fRpbe r 5 331 �'�� Ry ► ns �'n uC� FZc� `--�e�'` /%7/1/ #31/7- l -A-05, '4 ../ W 5, lFiy 6. T. 8. 9., 10. 11. 12. 13 14 1 -730 1_ 11 r LINIML1 i7j l l a. ;4; • at h 3 3 Al • eo ✓L i. Qfem v ,,�.t, `�j1, _ _ , i�:, 16. c�,' �.eC;L,n�C;•-: �S,1 C'c.��\,�,� c'��A�cl 17. , ,,', L ' 1 '` 4-Q,x_Lha Gz 7`t3 R (ar es6,-= v W v (r\' tub C.� r r�- : ' s � A , i 19. I s,r c -,)' u,' a #- `AI e i �, n 3 3 1' -\-r-, ,3; C �L 20. i f 7—DP A` PIl, v I. 4433 6eG c �1 i 21.'�a.mmul 6i r-rt� jai) /�i ,/v�,ti,,,// ISLiL, Da /,v,cof Or („.- „2 22 ,,, �: /1J�4l24.-; �763 OA Au)I/v4`jI/,A/le. Ile C ii440L3, U14- 23. ,., �., � �, `t c- < . -�� �--,� (( _, �� �. ? - A?�� Pc;C3LX S Q.ct4 (1u)4 care n T '�`a s) 15. 0:2,--,1 (, ' � (-ti 5? 0ld ('/ 4,i5p,__.,ec1 : 11;,. E/A. :4'.tl,-) )� 3' T.`/ /V 6,./.1--n1 it _F'? i PL- // / si ed.: support the recommendations and P bborr Replt for G1 the under gn ed Schools as stated in the Blue Ri Glenvar' Middle- and �� March 17, 1997. We likewise supportmKinsey Shane's recommendations for additions and renovations atthese schools as endorsed bydt the Ribbon of- 'Supervisors Committee- We ask the School Board. teimmediatel with additions and. `Supervisors to approve funding to proceedSchool may vations so that Glenvar Middle School and. Glenvar Hi repo independent factlitles operate as fully functional, rode P Print Name Address Signature of Roanoke County (House it, street, City) Resident 3 4. ,\ U/ 6 7 81 9. d 10. e 11. 12 _ 13. --1- 15 16 17. 18. 1 20. 21. n, u, MiLeara- r ri Zi VINNiffe. 23. 24. 25. DGA) •L-)l cic/ 7'7 /7V • 33/ . ( a • v-'l P D:/' pt WA.. • J r v (V /oc �, . S I 6 5 /U .e-1 . i o • A ;_' pr, • 53 cd tAn / IQ Sa Y` ^ (424,11-Q. g�o vU.4 ozDiZ,SA UA- 1 f o4t_.. .c i AA; ,,(2e30 8 !l ` 47/7Z a— D p, 4 i 1 iAl� `A I t n� . t ' ` '11 Air _1�.SWent_ , • 4' t We the undersigned support -the recommendations -and prioriiization:for. Glenvar Middle and Hlgh- Schools as stated-- in the Blue Ribbon-Reportdated:March-17; 1997: We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations foradditions and renovations at these schools as endorsed by the. Blue Ribbon Committee: We-askthe School Board to seek funding and the Board. of Supervisors to approve- fundingto proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that GlenvarMiddle School and GienvarHigh School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities.. Signature of Roanoke County Resident (Print name on line below signature) Resident Address (House No. &.StreetName- and City/Town) 1. ' 22,get --,. N _ _ 'Ti` D ;- Arl7/2, rI &ry, gob' 'S 54/,2,-, cc/l _•'_� . ).,} Tn7v cif` 1 u� (rt-c?- (- �e- .. � ° h 1 I / J / LA__ Acs scc-- „,,, , (i,/x- ,,2--( J 4rn u )/ev,, r s . 5- , -v, ./ir -72 j/ 33 r, ct-c. » 7. _ .717aior C (kCs }'8hl6 dAe/v ' //, - 5. 60114 , 0 . C �'.� , 1 AAPA `' - r A d 41)3 4. ! . L ^ /0117 i [A 2_6416-s 10. ( AAa2 �'YIC , nq % Q ram AD q/, , 11. ice, _,,/ v,- 2y/ 12. &1`") C)i 144t3 CO 2P N- - 13. R,e4/ A). a.) /Mg l' Gce L.). .% _ - iyie,, -vim.. vfis3 We the undersigned supporttherecommendations and. prioritization forGlenvar Middle and Higir Schools as stated_ in fhe: Blue•Ribbon Reportdated March-17; 1997: We likewise support -Kinsey Shane's recommendations foradditions and renovations atthese schools as endorsed by the- Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Board to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions andrenovations so that_GlenvarMiddle School and GlenvarHigh School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities_ Signature of Roanoke County Resident (Print name on line below signature) Resident Address (House No. & Street Name and City/Town) I/r;,a, , V,4 ) s 3 2: `::.) N (L(Lc_,\ W Q I Pr Co ZZ F i . LEW IS 1:2J--\J 0 1sri0 VA a4(3 3. c2i, n � i . C, �� ' ( Q-1r(7 1: (. I ,'/ . ,-w/ S 3 4. ' ,. y Le .5._ ,/ )/, / /r ' 1 Si..._ ice. - /i Sir' /" /.c;-79 ,b' 6. h/61A'„.1‘ Lid- Lf Li ) . t) u,. i.,eA1 d 7. \K C- A., 17,-,,Q' (',, c)1.) A - 8. J , 3 W - _7/r 7z, ,c6lX7 1_ �1y'.3 9. , ► y _5, S� i 7/Ul: J 10. 6 2--2--S / 6. /',<� /c ,...--.; .- C •c /- i`-� i /. *- SAS 11. 7Y-Aftet -) 77� - z f k c( ra3( /�t -LA . ied � S c (.eyvt ti `/, s 3 12- f , , by ) C'.cm (c ati 1 for Ott, Rci R oberA-o. U. C.on, n•e - Sa1ev., . V A a Li S3 13. ' 4 A)\-L 4 ,.,----, . (n 01i-k 1 ?oast M 4.n , R d , era . C.o..\.,,i;L_.r S a.`2ww , VA a 4 53 3 riorit°II forGlenvar" recommendations and- p. March` va undersigned support the recomm WeMl the a Schools as stag in the-B1ue,RibbonnRReport-datediis raddiMarc -17 1997: and h ortKinseY Shane's recommendations Committee: We ask the reno: We lilac supp bythe Blue Ribbon Supervisors to approve funding -to Sc renovations Board oa d t here schools asana endorsed of Sup Glepprove f u le School see1 and renovations so that School Bo �iately 'with -additions � fully functional, independent -facilities_ proceed immediately may operate and Gienvar�k Resident Resident.Address Signature of Roanoke County (House en .AddreNam Si (Print name on line below signature) and City/Town) -q, • We the undersigned. supportthe recommendations, and prioritization for, Glenvar- Middle•and.High Schools -as stated` in•theBlue-Ribbon Report -dated March-17; 1997: We likewise support. Kinsey Shane's recommendations for•additions.and renovations-atthese-schools as endorsedby the Blue Ribbon Committee. We askthe School Board to seek funding. and. the Board. of Supervisors- to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and_ renovations so that GlenvarMlddle School and GlenvarHigh School may operate as fully functional, independent- facilities; Signature of Roanoke County Resident (Print name on line below signature) Resident Address (House No_& Street -Name- and City/Town) 1. a,(1W-taJ . c_ -, (A c,(,(.21rU r 1-2'pa /A -C, - 01_. L (�n/ i9,uljif- Vfl- 2' 7 ) -�,�.r 3 l.� �c'7.- 7if'/1-2-176.4.z1, D,�;1.:_4 17 / 19 % euJ � �(' ° 1 r C�uc� 4: � �,.� .i/Ae ,/ leg V '7 /%JOIt,e4iiei1 A,. f/m ,i4, // ' s?� Y , _ 5:. ok 41 YPr 'dbtool ,4c1• 1)vAti la W. Salem , VII ZY/5� 6. 7I 1IL& �L oz 3-,1' ( iLAnt1 (fir _ ►� 'iii , IOU/ Oh Iv( . Sc (_ P v1-1 VVA a-y I S 3 r+ _-.. 1 j k e r 7.. 4Y to 1(1,Se,v --4-I €& • 9-,A A- %L- S c2- ,2 ! f r: 0 ,c.. 4 41e %.. ,12____, ,ce,31)1_11,1c---ekkj,„,.(t_. 10.. PS 2 JJo(,)( LA. . 27 Jla1L\ j7(- Co(l , l n (111 �Ill- �- &/I= Al cctew ()Old ,� 12. > ?� --t e_;CL.A...,x ! \,11, ti . 13. , D" 3253 6,4,-:=4§ R4,4J j PRA7 1 We the undersigned support -the recommendations and prioritization for Glenvar Middle and High Schools as statedin the Blue Ribbon Report dated March 17, 1997. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations for additions and renovations at these schools as endorsed by the -Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Board to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that Glenvar Nfiddle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Resident (Print name on line below signature) Resident Address (House No. & Street Name and City/Town) 1. .atitn,..7,__.0, ril F. . F sl2 11 .; D.1 /.- O 86 1r IRGl. 4ishp Y Scx rv? 'a, 4) 1: 3. 6.1k f-or 14ei_2- 4g1.0 ',; (- e'.)cc w f,;, PRY .h a r _ /-W die__ € 54.1 an, V Ta ;' 4. .. 9-t, Tim' 4 VZ0 1614 -\ iv) \. \ (� o r b � 4 Ka . �+, a�'0 \• ^^ 5-J �^-` , v p' Qu I ` j . 5. J 1/7/ 5.-) ( ++ n <i? //,� 1,-7 - �- y i j -75 //zt +;' -vCf 61.0 6. Ct-' .i Nib (atos7 Ape,,._3(-1,^i- r4 A,.,'t-fir (-..) C_:i" -o uj )o u, uc)n 7. , (l,C\rci_ c..e.Ar, e 51'0 8. Cu SG 4 S i U roJ 50 /1 I ‘ Caii7f be l ( .).) r- _-a-A�w� of _ s i n- V 4 y r 53 9. 504 j ( /c, a 4S( 1 % /-mow, rL 10. JOin vt irl.nCilcf- .2I `fc? Sic•-�itil; c ( ShC-..., `f)j3 11. ' r hl i ,J )1 )-.? iLfz, ,-)-o - ,., Az 7r .rn,,- r, 12. JA f; S0 Py x ,-;,<, L - 7 ( 13. , : '�''# .6I3 7etYjb� rrf i L ki. i J We the undersigned support the recommendations and prioritization for Glenvar Middle and High Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated March 17m , 1997. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations for additions and renovations at these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Board to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that Glenvar Middle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Print Name Address Resident 2. (House #, Street, City) /h; � tz c 6 S 4-7- 7l 7 3. -KCa_lb, c,P7 5 j (r)C,zi�c�!�J.�Ln�,� /70 / ////�1/0{,/00' ..-- Ir76V ,71/i,/./jr, d; 2/1: / /)/t / V •. ` 4%/1„ /'7,5 ? ,rr/ - i 31kfi (/. 4L 5 5 S r✓FAY- / y- =Cr?" C20(.f;rin4 «cnqPIn ,(T i�2�r'rv('J�;v�'�L ZYG(c? 17. 18. 19. 6) , 20. 1 '7_, 14P m r s, R GAw Ali /' LL�)�� 4 cf 1z `71z) Ahei rC& kr. i<Z. v i 23• �i� ��C1,� �,� �� fit,` j 4•=c)f /G- f I /���' K.:/195711 ipA.7 /i- ��. JayrJ)I')5G/1 71('4i /v+'hCr^, 2s. rrl %It /4f/li% : /,(r /Jvz_ We the undersigned support the recommendations and prioritization for Glenvar Middle and High Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated March 17, 1997. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations for additions and renovations at these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Conunittee. We ask the School Board to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that Glenvar Middle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Print Name Resident Address (House #, Street, City) 10. /km k .5eA4 (-7 6-(2, / i/i/()! _-)c). 4/. 14)1I v (1 81vd 4'57 L1 Ei vd 7/:; 7 5511::7,i) )/5/,) tit Pr (-16C i• Rj 706 modiJJ Frr 13. ./ - i‘;•..,_ / , 1I 4 • /.1 -A/--1, ybs./:,,-- /../(1(_ vii -/.;,7 , /.....,/.L1- . L ;//,c77)(0 i. , 41/7:f _),,-C (k4/ /_.I , „..- ./: )..) - 2:.-,;- ,,_/ , .., ./ /--; A- e ,;(__ •t..:..-r'' .,7,:r !/( i • 16. `•(/?,/, 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. I ; - 1"..) - — , • 0t—R,i ,s, L z-L4 a--(n;k 74i , c 'Lj7_) ' ;4 / •/fr"^" - LiT H'L: -5 \Q _ • Sji L-1\ (-)1A9 2-4--t-U-t-C.0_ Lt Sc4ry, )co((.2.d9J Z&/ )/4 AP(Iu 41e1 vsm • We the undersigned support the recommendations and prioritization for Glenvar Middle and High Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated March 17, 1997. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations for - additions and renovations at these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Board to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that Glenvar Middle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Print Name Address Resident 1 z. etp j3A; ry `2 4 2E/ C�wL'' c\c�.(- \ C1 Cs z1 t * \\ cui i z. tvt a rih 0..(� Led* � 6\ ex- q �(� red Hi , i i tit f ((i ..�; � r . 3 ; au, 11 • �. (�� n ��.:`..o � nr-n. �, 1 �`, ,f1;c.�,,,,..5 zZ: E Tyr,-:�_:.� �� Dr1�.I,F-r,,— 13. Z�// //� -� �� 4 li //I/ S'krrer c /4 ' / 1 bri '/ (House #, Street, City) c l I (S;, n; /tire' Sc (gam MO— l f M.S-\\ 20. ;) %I ee, 21•LillaCji ()IV - 14. 15.E 16. 17. `; C�T� ti/�� f ,1 L (i-T �� 19. ,r1 , 1,,.; .l �t �i , 64.1,„ bLell 23. ,� , • / • A 24. A 75. r l ,_ /7, V / �i iL .��.�� 1;�2 .s ,s2 v /i- r iVD3 FccT\C�,c\q 7N-p<iIIf�F;cicz 1 [e;ti1v�4 453 IAnS L nrx -r T)r. m i 7S le1&tA,1447 _S 1.e (tI(f / i/rk < SLRj cc 0• 1! %Yti Y / AK: r" �� 5 T..' 7 L;42 y 7 'r , i \:� 1 iJ \ ..1\ ! 1�. �.`: l V '� i ThL �t'C' % rat f / \ YOU fry,_ We the undersigned support the recommendations and prioritization for Glenvar Middle and High Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated March 17, 1997. We likewise•support Kinsey Shane's recommendations for additions and renovations at these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Board to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that Glenvar Middle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Print Name Address (House #, Street, City) Resident 1. - b)n;e,t CarLA :(-67"ort cjk, L:TP;C,i 711 ACCO tY)-1-`; lt-7 4.C-1)-i SI;lorn\Asck ) Vh , •,t‘ („si 12:)ci 6. k/LITE..s . 7 frL, .-tt•NA.... 3 25-g 1,, 741 Sf9,:, /47 8. igAir A c4-54 . 3 1C1`)C, /67,(t. ii3/1/./ rt • ;19/ (3 9. /La,- 'it) )7ai 33_21C _i-C111-) )))(se i 1 41 Lem, 1,74 z)L f 107b I n • LCCWJ LItlq0 I_Yrk RYCY ,712(x7r 174 ric/1 14( ‘-K 694/mfv 6;40-fife /YL-} diPe)Lti 7 icAti cPbur - 1V Sp!/ i» //5" 13. l',1 ),-, . ---..._,,:1_,,, ,", 14-.-DAii Apt,li...FN) ‘i70-3 ,4tv) "DP 'FIE (4 zycl, .15..-52,--,z'l c:1_ A /.71 t/0 7 a n I (J.5„•ii (,cloov-7,- -ed -1-rd.:,,,,,A__ 16. `.5:',„.Li0 -::( j cr tErvs•,\k,C c--1 8 2 bci 3 u.i).0? cl, /4,1 17. :\/.-4 ,,,/,.,e. ,bc,,,,,-.) 3•L--,Dil .,.1e -6)---:5-51'x.;t ,,, i(;,47:6- lak. I lk ,-r , Qt 1X ., )--.. 18. t14,7 41 vq7,..1 A1,7-4,) i 11///i-,7- cS-7,-:-. Al 19. iielc-Ai ,-A N-le. , 3 I a' n Gi , / C) 0 e ,i ,3"-i-3.: filc 1../rnic-• / lt).(-A(i'vrr CL -1r- e=<=c H : 1 i i -)--6-7. G-um---r 21. , )7/-c , 2\1', Cn//II_ i/..// --;) 7 2-5-‘---- c7/', '41/ •'/=-r"\ 22. -.1-6)11/ .., c) hi I-, r cA-L-p(L criv-v--- -L )6/76 /11. I I Pc-Idi)- c'a 1 i /.- 23/,,,c,2, tc),,, 1 e,- 1-"? 0 4 rn, )) Pu.)ci Dr i.u.._,,-,L.. i''i-) 2,11 3 {.41:41 L. k -b. '(..) S k 01,73 2--)(;1/4. Ck), -..)/10x., , ))/ 'I ,S [but_ 'I/In' c,(,,L,v‘._ liA- ,14i) 3 75. — N tu'e77,---Z-f Ae e We the undersigned support the recommendations and prioritization for Glenvar Middle and High Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated March 17, 1997. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations for additions and renovations at these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Board to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that Glenvar Middle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Resident (Print name on tine below signature) Resident Address (House No. & Street Name and City/Town) •aa V • ,'oA.v 2. /A s M5- 1 .-D sa __ by i a 3. L A ,.)//�[/1-23 t,J Z. 5S �(0 S c. C / � b�- . S�r Ie, 7 Y '� W�i-- JOEIIEIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII `"�. / y0 C(o, , .Z l/ 6 AgArrnAl. 6 ale. /Or f /i' G° - roe (gate c -C,e 5h, _. .._,,,d- • !J. , A • of tAINMEIONMIIIEMI (i- i e_ A 9)=-i 15 I A Nl - 0;'C) 1i. \-6 0Lv •rlh0._ • h-AM -2E i 10. �r. �.:� 1/ l�� 35.3 i , &i � /ri i -- . i l Psi �, ' /J S' r Li �A 11. 4 / i i / ,: /� c c / , , k'4, a d . / L( 1, ., .- _ /evh 1//4 j 12- AIMMItaranillIIIIMMIERWEEMIll - 13. _, ME u - a T 71 I. _ J qi?G We the undersigned support the recommendations and prioritization for Glenvar Middle and High Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated March 17; 1997. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations for additions and renovations at these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Board to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that Glenvar Middle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Resident (Print name on line below signature) Resident Address (House No. & Street Name and Clty/Town) 1. ,i4, 7',,,,_, rYe4 (// vy,i ,(el , . 2. � jfij —14 AZ,c Q ,-/4/! 3: 'knr' i 1 ��. - -70 /Lc-yi�r % l `` y , O 4. 1 '21,6''v ,e„,/ P6 z r /it •,. ,P,,t . (6_ 5. 1 rl S 5 (1' G 1,NJ l� irA-1 (� j i7V , t . 6. ! 11, 4 mi) / /,,' >--tm, rr„ 11 — ,-.1. - 4.z hw 3 %/92-, �', ,-y rtl �% 9. Lit, .t4- b3�,2/ en,6.e¢ 0,. ec k r; ,� 1ii H/0/ d 1�. _ a els h,�►�4 ►ne Ilt Via-- (;k.0 k ' --,,fit„-i Q,-6 11. '►. f Se f r ^k�,- .0 5 7 7- )��-(A ofce s viC .'fd 12. 13. J ;Luis We the undersigned support the recommendations and prioritization for Glenvar Middle and High Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated March 17, 1997. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations for additions and renovations at these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Board to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that Glenvar Middle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Resident (print name on line below signature) Resident Address (House No. & Street Name and City/Town) 1.iii_-_-....._ /Y /r4/i A, T C le.,.,//Stilt b .2 2. (-i 5 / q i\ l-.- f/&, LJ l 573 3. :lc. i/L/0 ,vko,:) n�,/ • . /; �� z �) 1, v 4 G ci ,. ?! A AO ,` 2 /67- /..,:� .; oc,) /,_,/,y4 ry 5. n`'.,.'-Th I- CZ' ',-.-y.- `<-', rA -t S\l'' 6. -iltiA, di c- 3V25 ,BuA -1 0 -77 - i i-nr-EIkAe M. 31mk.be J .5Z-&ern 74 JVI63 7. ©Y `, /4 1`,40/-z--,-- 77 - kq'S fJv // a w S S-f-e h e v Wr "1-0-t( IV' sa (P > i 8. ? P -�4.0 -5'133 Li /I J ) r. E EIizabe±h /ee, I/4- a ioid 9. L'K.1Ja., /7&-i r, n,,..v . 14u .-1-�' i i L, i, 3` L, �-�- II , D Dianne I-t, 4,unic; �5 5 m, Vol • 2,4 I53 10. F L� I,. 14 q 1r-ri 5cr. T� i / %5-r 1i_ P cwilr ki . ' ' .it,12_, . I ;b_ ci ,,,, 11, ,c99 b c) � arm;-{- Ac.rc T(+�'1 ce$ Q ; f L- - �91s3 12. �-- 13 r % //7 1%U_>.c} Arts � J' r7 l.JC & O !ems 13. y on h c. /9. Q/orr � 57z �� � �.e , , -,� a. , _ ? vie We the undersigned support the recommendations and prioritization for Glenvar Middle and High Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated March 17, 1997. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations for additions and renovations at these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Board to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that Glenvar Middle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Print Name Address Resident (House#, Street City) 1. 2. 3. 4. 2 it ///, 'y s 3 � �- � cJ n H� 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. We the undersigned support the recommendations and prioritization for Glenvar Middle and High Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report,dated March 17, 1997. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations for additions and renovations at these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Board to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that Glenvar Middle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Print Name Address Resident (House #, Street, City) 1. 2. 3.' 4. 1,-y-- j .ten; 6. peevj 7. 8. 9. / �O�i0rl /ne,Y�DYIe_s I)Zalca. C•t rcic \-J L I I V Z r.5 c n 5 '� c: S4'6- 47f - `"t 'l L'li (/t�'i �•r' T-r it ! le f J /3 e.'/r'�ji,• i /.•l1%,11/c:/ 339 EL-, 5-\ V\( (, , or., r 1 v=- - t! O 1. '-• n oh1 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. We the undersigned support the recommendations and prioritization for Glenvar Middle and High Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated March 17, 1997. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations foradditions and renovations at -these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Board to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that Glenvar Middle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Resident (Print name on line below signature) Resident Address (House No. & Street Name and City/Town) 1. J `f).ct_ Z7g r)),ra r, ah( Li-, Rai, . LivsCho`. 7)r1n„p - nJ , V14- 241�z 2. c11joeut. 76.0 )a, 0 'S32.'1 Ca�'t. a.)). c - $Cx'r"\LW o, FGS7-,G0h"t. cj a---, , Lx Z\-{ 1-s 3. /Coy _(c=. 13. •/411: ct,4-JJ ...3 :s' _c;; ,c.ii, it cE ' ; i -p;t.1ii(e, -0 ICI.441CS :3,"d2 in , VA aq, S 3 4. '%Af„ .: > /7/1-L 4" (%--, 2-1/4 4 r / l / 5. /° ._ ' l/.if1l1 / /. 1/J,7 ` / k, . Il h,7.% J il A'�/3 :% 6. c-/ r: c,_ k ct' i t j , :sit- ,- 4 / 4-( OLI I ., s4 , --Z(/ .//cc..ck_ ( _ ) J 1 ) ,Y 7. /`' V ` 7 ,2''' ,� ,-.,,.:, 553 I C he 1- kk e I4-I 11s' Pi-, 34 le r.-, DOf c..+1 _l\'1ulrid v 8. ? 2 ' ,-, L. 7.2 .._3_ , L • 11t r-, ke ,- 1--1-i' 11. c nr Set' 1e; n S U •e Vc1 le n+r rY, 9. • I) ilk c () r, L.,,.• . - ail,,' "P='t-i-i-wttr _ 2 --1Li P<<r 1-_ r,c<:, e, 1 ,rti, 10. r .� /--.��.4,:_c. • c- l 2 77 e) J 11. T- ,_ k_1,..,c;� ,-,- .__\)(._ ,,, •. ,. (,): << •L ` 5 c-- 12./-.-,.:r, ' -C1,•,-(ti r4:-. ( ...-Y,-:;:,r, J /4-Ci I67 1( \\ I I,-2.0....r..r (,D 1 (� l rk • /( U We the undersigned support the recommendations and prioritization for Glenvar Middle and High Schools as stated- in the Blue Ribbon Report dated March 17, 1997. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations for additions and renovations at these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Board to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that Glenvar Nlsddle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Resident (Print name on line below signature) Resident Address (House No. &.Street Name and City/fown) 1. Z1. r � ..� 2..q----- 34,023 © /� 64 % 6,4 ,�i " ` / 2. i/Lil 1 _ y 7, i rit [ ca z-( t:JCc."3" f" / ' e- 7"-CHi t_ '5,-m_ ^ [v-+- .Q 47/ " 3 3. 't__ Q ). h;,, 3 , cc z- 1-i.5 Lk e CA, a C0.,c. . 1Z A • \,Qrr V t•k153 4. v ,,ram % 4,>,, 11 ' va -'^/. (1,,,7 V. ,,�� . '/ 5 -2, j ‘' ` �1ft./9 nt ,�-. � a /li/j//APQ0 1\ Q, . 5. _ g ``�i `�. 1L\33 f)Cz26�,'62` 1eiA11=� Q-11.3- e4-ssy _ --1., -L, ,,,-,(-' J 6. ,T ;'r( )CL r 33 7 /3 ,. W %4 y 4/L 4./ 1 S Ct...e., c.,4- _.,,,-s 7 7. (\ 1 i' / : r2 4,4194 - 3 A- ?110.rLoJtaul) t 'Dk._ Ar(' 5 P tv\ e,r- a1 V 1�- ,z� 8. . c- AL_, .� . igc A n 'Sd57 A rob 1a-r) L. .ir t4rZT,P). 9. ,.-:-.1,,z .6-3�a.)—.; 1 -7(pqS i u. c 1SOC,, c 1 n R I c. W rl \Mfl P5 �,1 1 3 3 10. 7V. i ma's S V>,",<< sacu K-al,,, Kii. 11. ,:, 12. 13. We the undersigned support the recommendations and prioritization for Glenvar IVrddle and High Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated March 17, ort Kinsey Shane's recommendations for additions and. 1997. We likewise suppthe Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the renovatiotis:at these schools as endorsed bySupervisors to approve funding to School Board to seek. funding and the Board of Su P roceed immediately with additions and renovations so that in depende_ntDfddle School and Glenvar Highp School may operate as fully f Signature of Roanoke County Resident (Print name on line below signature) 13. Resident. Address (House No_ & Street Name and Clty'/Town) We the undersigned support the recommendations and prioritization for Glenvar Middle and High Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated March 17; 1997. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations for additions and. renovations at these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the School Board to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that Glenvar Middle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Resident (Print name on line below signature) Resident Address (House No. Br- Street Name and City/Town) ZA..-__! (, 7.z 7 f27::'A < ;AN iR A T (70uvv--- a C,---, , U' A 2 c0 ' - � 9 art/in‘ Cov,e 1ZL2C ,, `3-7b ' 7 s,_(evn, veg- v/sT 3. .: nip 1,z. ern .C.'., . Bo 3a� �I C�lc.w t 00 ,-y01L 4. ,ot; r-- )43 4 1 i 1,A.k (-., C., Ptcz t MA(b-;r-. I Sal \(c.— L- S3 5. 3 36 '9i Un 4P4 )&1 n e bbi •e i—u r 11 er '`- 1 I le?r . t4,1 3 Y i 5 3 6. U, /1-t -- 3.4/- .(7.-r 2e-e cite,.., 1/4- ,,--//s-3 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. We the undersigned support the recommendations and prioritization for Glenvar Middle and Sigh Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated March-17; 1997. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations for -additions and renovations at these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon -Committee. We ask the School Board to seek.funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that Glenvar Middle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Resident (Print name on line beloyw signature) Resident Address (House No. &.Street Name and Clty/Town) 1. _' -7 ��- 1/4-- 1 .' SS 6� R 1. 1 .Q.61-.4, ro W_ eV.) 2. FIN .mT 5s-.5-s' n QL 0,0 c-i 1\G act/ $3 3. . 4 3)4 * I 48u.t I( -4610 LQ _ .L- 4. 'rn-, 115 Sy,�rr 3167 F,ri-sl /9.,f„ Ti Ijc.) r.•✓ 1 . -, 0JO rnai nr; 1 U i 1 (v6-)0 �hri 1 Fri .z 6. L `� i q \U -1,10 (n(os-�-'ey(I 1.3 I 7. 10. 11. 12. 13. 7l Az-r-)�� Ct 111 ��-- 7(e4'— :3?5 (,)k Dc, (( 0C Vim- u j S 1i.Q tm tC� 7L/(5: I�(���,,L • I-3 I? U rv-es 1 AC :t rc 1 25-- S jorv" \)CA_ a-+13 s��dEk L / JAZ , 1/A .,1 We the undersigned support the recommendations and prioritization for Glenvar Middle and High Schools as stated in the Blue Ribbon Report dated March 17, 1997. We likewise support Kinsey Shane's recommendations for additions and renovations at these schools as endorsed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. We ask the 'School Board to seek funding and the Board of Supervisors to approve funding to proceed immediately with additions and renovations so that Glenvar Middle School and Glenvar High School may operate as fully functional, independent facilities. Signature of Roanoke County Resident (Print name on line beiow signature) Resident Address (House No. & Street Name and City/Town) 1. fl /4r?/ S' gem.// J ' _5 !Lrv,%1)cw RBI cP%' -, t y. p.', . \'`h L1 C j 101 1 l? Y t ''i' Ga-' 1- A'\ G tw V IT , i , 3. .,.k ,1. W 6 I-34ct0 A-IA1-vazTnc 4. '4_- Nta--- 36d3 (cr '-- J. / (^,. ate'` I U k4.'�. -) . 4' Vn - �"�1 , SG. \....,,,.. 6. ) - .S J i /-?r .§..4..:./ Rd. j - - (k) , ,,.._ ) -RJR /t',,- 7. (4 < U� 'l7./ k i 10. /"f }LL1 i(l• L�.A()l1! j�)il ,ACk/4/77 r ,_�/) /iJ -, J k-r t ., 1 ,14 dp;_i `,fiL (,12' 70 /° / / / , 112. I 1 ./ JGF^ _i r 1 j 1 1t /)%- i Inc •jGC'1 C �,.r 4-c : 6ce.- . ' 13. -=z.\ Qr.r.Th AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON OCTOBER 27, 1998 RESOLUTION 102798-13 CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the Certification Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Johnson A COPY TESTE: /6-UA,6) 244LtL Brenda J. Holton, CMC Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Executive Session (County of aanotte MARY H. ALLEN, CMC CLERK TO THE BOARD Internet E-Mail: mallen@www.co.roanoke.va.us P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (540) 772-2005 FAX (540) 772-2193 November 24, 1998 Mr. Tom Reed, Chairman Alliance for Organ and Tissue Donation 1527 Huguenot Road Midlothian, VA 23113 Dear Mr. Reed: BRENDA J. HOLTON DEPUTY CLERK Internet E-Mail: bholton@www.co.roanoke.ya.us This is to inform you that Mary H. Allen, Clerk, Roanoke County Board of Supervisors has been re -appointed to the Alliance for Organ and Tissue Donation. This appointment was made by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on October 27, 1998, and is for a term of two years which will expire November 21, 2000. If you need additional information, please let me know. cc: Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Sincerely, 604,A, 42-642,- Brenda J. Holton, CMC Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors ® Recycled Paper irn f atiatwtu MARY H. ALLEN, CMC CLERK TO THE BOARD Internet E-Mail: mallen@www.co.roanoke.va.us P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (540) 772-2005 FAX (540) 772-2193 October 30, 1998 Ms. Helen Smythers Fifth Planning District Commission P. 0. Box 2569 Roanoke, VA 24010 Dear Ms. Smythers: BRENDA J. HOLTON DEPUTY CLERK Internet E-Mail: bholton@www.co.roanoke.va.us Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 102798-2 expressing the support of Roanoke County for Project Impact and agreement to commit staff and resources to the project. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, October 27, 1998. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosure cc: Anne Marie Green, Director, Community Relations e Recycled Paper MARY H. ALLEN, CMC CLERK TO THE BOARD C.7ountv oanoke P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2005 FAX (703) 772-2193 October 29, 1998 Mr. James E. Cornwell, Jr., Esq. Sands, Anderson, Marks & Miller P. O. Box 1052 Radford, VA 24141-0052 Dear Mr. Cornwell: BRENDA J. HOLTON DEPUTY CLERK At the regular meeting of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors on October 27, 1998, the Board appointed the following representatives to Virginia's First Regional Industrial Facility Authority. They will serve four year terms beginning September 24, 1998 and expiring September 24, 2002. Members: Bob L. Johnson. Chairman, Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, P. 0. Box 29800, Roanoke, Va 24018-0798 Timothy W. Gubala, Director, Economic Development, P. 0. Box 29800, Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Alternates: Fenton F. "Spike" Harrison, Supervisor, Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, P. 0. Box 29800, Roanoke, VA 24018-798 Joyce W. Waugh. Assistant Director, Economic Development, P. 0. Box 29800, Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 As soon as we receive the certified copies of their oaths from the Clerk of Circuit Court, we will forward them to Mr. Rundgren as you requested. The original certificate from the Secretary of the Commonwealth which provides for the creation of the authority has been received and will be recorded among the minutes. If I can provide further assistance in this matter, please let me know. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bjh cc: Dave Rundgren MARY H. ALLEN, CMC CLERK TO THE BOARD Lrnxxtt rnirtu P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2005 FAX (703) 772-2193 October 29, 1998 Mr. James D. Campbell Executive Director Virginia Association of Counties 1001 East Broad Street Richmond, VA 23219 Dear Mr. Campbell: BRENDA J. HOLTON DEPUTY CLERK At their regular meeting held on October 27, 1998, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors adopted a motion in support of the nomination of Harry C. Nickens as the Region Nine Representative on the Virginia Association of Counties Board of Directors. We would appreciate your forwarding this endorsement to the appropriate individuals for action at the annual meeting. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bjh Attachment cc: The Honorable Harry C. Nickens MARY H. ALLEN, CMC CLERK TO THE BOARD Totuttv of Xioartoke P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2005 FAX (703) 772-2193 October 29, 1998 The Honorable Fenton F. Harrison Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 BRENDA J. HOLTON DEPUTY CLERK Ms. Joyce Waugh, Assistant Director Department of Economic Development P. O. BOX 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Supervisor Harrison and Ms. Waugh: am pleased to inform you that, at their meeting held on Tuesday, October 27, 1998, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to appoint each of you as alterante members to represent Roanoke County to Virginia's First Regional Industrial Facility Authority. Your four year terms began on the date of the creation of the authority which was September 24, 1998, and will expire on September 24, 2002. For your further information, the Board also appointed Supervisor Bob L. Johnson and Mr. Tim Gubala as members of the authority. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, or appointed to any public body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act. Your copy is enclosed. State law requires that you take an oath of office before the Clerk of the Roanoke County Circuit Court. This oath must be administered prior to your participation on this authority. Please telephone Steven A. McGraw, at 387-6205, to arrange to have this oath administered, and Mr. McGraw has asked that you bring this letter with you. Also, please ask Mr. McGraw to forward a certified copy of your oath to the Clerk's Office to be sent to Mr. Dave Rundgren. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept these appointments. Sincerely, 141 Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures cc: Steven A. McGraw, Clerk, Circuit Court Dave Rundgren James E. Cornwell, Jr., Esq. e Recyded Paper MARY H. ALLEN, CMC CLERK TO THE BOARD Toixntg of o«xmikP P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2005 FAX (703) 772-2193 October 29, 1998 The Honorable Bob L. Johnson Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P. 0. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Chairman Johnson and Mr. Gubala: BRENDA J. HOLTON DEPUTY CLERK Mr. Timothy W. Gubala, Director Department of Economic Development P. 0. BOX 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 am pleased to inform you that, at their meeting held on Tuesday, October 27, 1998, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to appoint each of you as a representative from Roanoke County to Virginia's First Regional Industrial Facility Authority. Your four year terms began on the date of the creation of the authority which was September 24, 1998, and will expire on September 24, 2002. For your further information, the Board also appointed Supervisor Fenton F. "Spike" Harrison and Joyce W. Waugh, Assistant Director, Economic Development Department, to serve as alternates to the authority. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, or appointed to any public body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act. Your copy is enclosed. State law requires that you take an oath of office before the Clerk of the Roanoke County Circuit Court. This oath must be administered prior to your participation on this authority. Please telephone Steven A. McGraw, at 387-6205, to arrange to have this oath administered, and Mr. McGraw has asked that you bring this letter with you. Also, please ask Mr. McGraw to forward a certified copy of your oath to the Clerk's Office to be sent to Mr. Dave Rundgren. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept these appointments. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures cc: Steven A. McGraw, Clerk, Circuit Court Dave Rundgren James E. Cornwell, Jr., Esq. ®RecYGedPaper DRAFT - 10-22-98 (9:00 am) ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA OCTOBER 27, 1998 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement in order to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings or other programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County, please contact the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772-2005. We request that you provide at least 48-hours notice so that proper arrangements may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call 2. Invocation: 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Proclamation declaring the Week of October 25 - 31, 1998 as Red Ribbon Week in Roanoke County. 2. r0 D. BRIEFINGS i 1. Annual Report from Blue Ridge Community Services Board. (Rita Gliniecki, Roanoke County representative) E. NEW BUSINESS Request to appropriate refund from Virginia Public School Authority on Refunding of Series 1994B VPSA Bond Issue. (Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance) F. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCE - CONSENT AGENDA 1. Ordinance to rezone approximately 0.75 acre from R-1 to C-1 to allow an accounting office in an existing house, located at 3716 Colonial Avenue, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Mark Harrell. G. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES ® Second reading of ordinance authorizing quitclaim and e-tsf release of a water and sanitary sewer easement within the Y`pt- cul-de-sac of Otter Park Court and located between Lot 8, Block 2, Section 3 and Tract A-1, Block 2, Section 3 of the Groves, in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. (Arnold Covey, Director of Community Development) H. APPOINTMENTS 1. Blue Ridge Alliance for Organ and Tissue Donation 2. Building Code Board of Adjustment and Appeals 3. Grievance Panel 4. League of Older Americans - Advisory Council 5. New Century Venture Center Board of Directors 2 6. Task Force for Senior and Physically Challenged Citizens 7. Virginia's First Regional Industrial Facilities Authority I. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE a CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Approval of minutes for September 8, 1998, September 22, 1998, and October 7, 1998. Resolution of support for "Project Impact sponsored by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. 3. Resolution requesting acceptance of Belmont Court and a portion of Derby Drive into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary Road System. 4. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Winterberry Point, Section 2. 5. Acceptance of off -site sanitary sewer facilities serving Winnbrook, Section 1. 6. Request for endorsement of Supervisor Harry C. Nickens to serve as Region Nine representative on the Virginia Association of Counties Board of Directors. J. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS K. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS L. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS 3 M. REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Future School Capital Reserve 5. Proclamation signed by the Chairman 6. Report on history of Roanoke County Woman's Club during its 75th Anniversary 7. Report of Claims Activity for the Self -Insurance Program N. WORK SESSIONS (4TH FLOOR CONFERENCE RO 1. Long Range Development Planning - 1 7 Discussion on the Community Plan O. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to Code of Virginia Section 2.1- rd e344 A (3) acquisition of real estate: (1) water transmission T � i cam,►-5lines easement and (1�•'�''"�` v_ `b EVENING SESSION (7:00 P.M.) P. CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION Q. PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Public Hearing and first reading of ordinance to adopt a new Community (Comprehensive) Plan for Roanoke County, Virginia. (Janet Scheid, Senior Planner) R. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES Second reading of ordinance to vacate a 6-foot portion of a 60-foot unimproved right-of-way referred to as Thomas Drive as recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 179, located in the Catawba Magisterial District. (Arnold Covey, Director of Community Development) 2. Second reading of ordinance enacting Sections 10-9.1, 2 3, and 4 in Article I of Chapter 10 Licenses of the Roanoke County Code to incorporate and conform with recent General Assembly legislation regarding limitation on gross receipts for pari-mutuel wagering, real estate brokers, providers of funeral services, and staffing firms for business, professional and occupational license tax purposes. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 3. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to construct a 100 ft. cellular monopole tower and support building, located on Catawba Valley Drive, 0.75 mile west of Oakey- Dolon Rd., Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of U. S. Cellular. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) 4. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to operate a bed and breakfast from an existing home, located at 5209 Catawba Valley Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of David and Lucy Downs. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) 5. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to develop and operate a used automobile dealership, located in the 3100 block of Brambleton Avenue, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the petition of Mark Hough. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) 6. Ordinance on a proposal of the Roanoke County Planning Commission to amend and re-enact Section 30-28, 30-29-7 5 and 30-87-2 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance to adopt new standards pertaining to the development of broadcasting towers within Roanoke County. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) S. CITIZEN COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS T REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS U. ADJOURNMENT 6 To: "Timothy Gubala" < ADM01/TWG > Subject: Re: appts to Virginia's First Regional Industrial Facility Autho Date sent: Thu, 22 Oct 1998 08:26:18 I'll revise the report and bring it over to you to look at. > From: "Timothy Gubala" < ADM01 /TWG > > To: adm01 /mha > Date: Thu, 22 Oct 1998 08:14:58 +0000 > Subject: appts to Virginia's First Regional Industrial Facility Authority > Cc: adm01 /ech > The Authority met and revised its by-laws last evening. They require > that one of a localities reps be a member of the governing body. > The other can be either an elected or appointed official or an > employee. We are entitled to appoint 2 alternates who can vote in the > absence of the regular members. Your Board report should be revised > to reflect this new information. See me if you have questions. > Mary Allen 1 Thu, 22 Oct 1998 08:26:18 To: "Anne Marie Green" < ADM01 /AMG > Copies to: adm01/bjh Subject: Re: Addition to Agenda Date sent: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 16:24:39 Unless Elmer wants to discuss it, we usually put resolutions of support on Consent. Do you know whether he wants to "talk about it"? > From: > To: > Date: > Subject: "Anne Marie Green" < ADM01 /AMG > adm01 /ech, adm01 /mha Wed, 21 Oct 1998 16:15:38 +0000 Addition to Agenda > I have an addition to the agenda - we need a resolution of support > from the BOS for Project Impact. I will have it written by tomorrow. > I don't know if you want it for new business or the consent agenda - > just let me know. > Anne Marie Green, APR > Director, Community Relations > 772-2010 > Mary Allen 1 Wed, 21 Oct 1998 16:24:39 From: "Mary Hicks" < ADM01/MEH > To: adm01 /ech Date sent: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 14:13:37 + 0000 Subject: EOP deadline Copies to: adm01/mha TCF says DES in Richmond has to approve Co Plan as to content, and the BofS has to approve it for it to be in force. TCF thinks we will be OK as long as the Supers adopt it prior to Jan 1, but he will check with Richmond DES and let us know. Mary Allen 1 Wed, 21 Oct 1998 15:35:53 /0-9 747/"De/aa.>'i 0 n C.a- // � y*r� FEDc_i-iVed- r 3@0„ LEGAL NOTICE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, October 27, 1998, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of David & Lucy Downs to obtain a Special Use Permit to operate a bed and breakfast from an existing home, located at 5209 Catawba Valley Drive, Catawba Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: October 8, 1998 Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times Tuesday, October 13, 1998 Tuesday, October 20, 1998 Direct the bill for publication to: David & Lucy Downs 520 Grant St. Ashland, OH 44805 (419) 289-6353 SEND ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS P.O. BOX 29800, ROANOKE, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, October 27, 1998, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Mark Hough to obtain a Special Use Permit to develop and operate a used automobile dealership, located in the 3100 block of Brambleton Avenue, Cave Spring Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: October 8, 1998 Mary H. Aflen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times Tuesday, October 13, 1998 Tuesday, October 20, 1998 Direct the bill for publication to: Mark Hough c/o Budd, Ammen & Co. 505 S. Jefferson St Roanoke, VA 24009 (540) 989-2320 SEND ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS P.O. BOX 29800, ROANOKE, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, October 27, 1998, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on on a proposal of the Roanoke County Planning Commission to amend and re-enact Sections 30-28, 30-29-7 and 30-87-2 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. The purpose of these amendments is to adopt new standards pertaining to the development of Broadcasting Towers within Roanoke County. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: October 8, 1998 Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times Tuesday, October 13, 1998 Tuesday, October 20, 1998 Direct the bill for publication to: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors PO Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (540) 772-2005 SEND ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS P.O. BOX 29800, ROANOKE, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, October 27, 1998, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. The purpose of the hearing is to receive public comments on a proposed ordinance to adopt a new Community (Comprehensive) Plan for Roanoke County, Virginia. The proposed Community Plan is comprised of both text and maps. Once adopted by the Board of Supervisors, the plan will serve as a general guide for the long range use and development of all land within Roanoke County. The proposed plan has been prepared in accordance with guidelines contained in Sections 15.2-2223 and 2224 of the Code of Virginia, and Section 30-8-1 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance and has been advertised for public review in accordance with Section 15.2-2204 of the Code of Virginia. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: October 8, 1998 Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times Tuesday, October 13, 1998 Tuesday, October 20, 1998 Direct the bill for publication to: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors PO Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (540) 772-2005 SEND ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS P.O. BOX 29800, ROANOKE, VA 24018 The R Tuesday, 0 Administratic p.m. on County I of the Roanoke Cot 30-29-7 and 30-87-2 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. The purpose of these amendments is to adopt new standards pertaining to the development of Broadcasting Towers within Roanoke County. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: October 8, 1998 Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times Tuesday, October 13, 1998 Tuesday, October 20, 1998 Direct the bill for publication to: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors PO Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (540) 772-2005 SEND ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS P.O. BOX 29800, ROANOKE, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, October 27, 1998, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of US Cellular to obtain a Special Use Permit to construct a 100 ft. cellular monopole tower and support building, located on Catawba Valley Drive, 0.75 mile west of Oakey-Dolon Rd, Catawba Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: October 8, 1998 Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times Tuesday, October 13, 1998 Tuesday, October 20, 1998 Direct the bill for publication to: US Cellular c/o Engineering Concepts Inc. PO Box 619 Fincastle, VA 24090 (540) 473-1253 SEND ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS P.O. BOX 29800, ROANOKE, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, October 27, 1998, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of David & Lucy Downs to obtain a Special Use Permit to operate a bed and breakfast from an existing home, located at 5209 Catawba Valley Drive, Catawba Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: October 8, 1998 Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times Tuesday, October 13, 1998 Tuesday, October 20, 1998 Direct the bill for publication to: David & Lucy Downs 520 Grant St. Ashland, OH 44805 (419) 289-6353 SEND ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS P.O. BOX 29800, ROANOKE, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, October 27, 1998, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Mark Hough to obtain a Special Use Permit to develop and operate a used automobile dealership, located in the 3100 block of Brambleton Avenue, Cave Spring Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: October 8, 1998 Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times Tuesday, October 13, 1998 Tuesday, October 20, 1998 Direct the bill for publication to: Mark Hough c/o Budd, Ammen & Co. 505 S. Jefferson St Roanoke, VA 24009 (540) 989-2320 SEND ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS P.O. BOX 29800, ROANOKE, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, October 27, 1998, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. The purpose of the hearing is to receive public comments on a proposed ordinance to adopt a new Community (Comprehensive) Plan for Roanoke County, Virginia. The proposed Community Plan is comprised of both text and maps. Once adopted by the Board of Supervisors, the plan will serve as a general guide for the long range use and development of all land within Roanoke County. The proposed plan has been prepared in accordance with guidelines contained in Sections 15.2-2223 and 2224 of the Code of Virginia, and Section 30-8-1 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance and has been advertised for public review in accordance with Section 15.2-2204 of the Code of Virginia. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Planning and Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: October 8, 1998 Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times Tuesday, October 13, 1998 Tuesday, October 20, 1998 Direct the bill for publication to: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors PO Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (540) 772-2005 SEND ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS P.O. BOX 29800, ROANOKE, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their 7:00 p.m. session on Tuesday, October 27, 1998, in the Board Meeting Room at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive S. W. on the petition of Thomas Ltd. to vacate a 6-foot portion of a 60-foot unimproved right-of-way referred to as Thomas Drive, as recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 179, located in the Catawba Magisterial District. A copy of the documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Community Development, located at the Roanoke County Administration Center. Given under my hand this 8th day of October, 1998. Mary H. Allen, CMC, Clerk to the Board Roanoke County Board of Supervisors PLEASE PUBLISH IN THE ROANOKE TIMES ON Tuesday, October 13, 1998 Tuesday, October 20, 1998 (Petitioner listed below will bring payment) Joe Thomas Thomas Brothers 494 Glenmore Drive Salem, VA 24153 Mail affidavit to: Mary H. Allen, Clerk to the Board County of Roanoke P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 MEMO To: Mary Allen, Clerk to Board of Supervisors From: Arnold Covey, Engineering and Inspections Subject: Legal Notice Date: October 7, 1998 Please advertise the following notice in The Roanoke Times: Request to vacate a 6-foot portion of a 60-foot unimproved right-of-way referred to as Thomas Drive, as recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 179, located in the Catawba Magisterial District. Thank you. PLEASE BILL: JOE THOMAS THOMAS BROTHERS 494 GLENMORE DRIVE SALEM, VA 24153 • • • IN TER OF F ICE MEMO To: Board of Supervisors From: Mary H. Allen Subj: Appointment to the New Century Venture Center Board of Directors Date: September 25, 1998 County resident Owen Poole has served on the New Century Venture Center Board of Directors since it's inception. This was not a Board of Supervisors appointment when it was made in 1996. Mr. Poole has moved to Kingsport, Tennessee and the County position is vacant. Attached is a letter from the President of the New Century Venture Center requesting that the Board of Supervisors appoint an individual to serve on the Board of Directors. Since this is a new appointment by the Board, I thought I would let you know in advance that this will be placed on the October 13 agenda. If you have any questions or would like to know what type of individual should be appointed, please call Tim Gubala or me. CC: Elmer Hodge Tim Gubala THE NEVI CENTURY VENTURE CENTER September 18, 1998 Ms Mary Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors PO Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Dear Ms Allen: This is an official request to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to appoint a representative to serve as Roanoke County's position on the Board of Directors for The New Century Venture Center. I would appreciate the Board of Supervisors officially appointing someone to fill this vacancy as soon as possible. Our next Board meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, September 22, at 7:30 AM here at the Center. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Please give me a call if you have any questions. Sincerely, Lisa C. I on President 1354 Eighth Street, SW • Roanoke, VA 24015 • Phone: (540) 344-6402 • Fax: (540) 345-0262 • e-mail: lison@rev.net (County of oattoke MARY H. ALLEN, CMC CLERK TO THE BOARD Internet E-Mail: mallen@www.co.roanoke.va.us • • Mr. Ron Ihrig P. O. Box 20926 Roanoke, VA 24018 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (540) 772-2005 FAX (540) 772- 19 October 15, 1998 BRENDA J. HOLTON DEPUTY CLERK Internet E-Mail: bholton@www.co.roanoke.va.us Dear Mr. Ihrig: Attached is information on the League of Older Americans Advisory Council that you requested at the Board of Supervisors meeting on October 13. Also attached is the address and phone number for the League of Older Americans if you wish more information. If you know of an appointee for this vacancy, please call me at 772-2003 and I will contact one of the supervisors to recommend the appointment. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board ® Recycled Paper Blue Ridge Community Services Susan J. Cloeter Chairman Rita N. Foster Vice Chairman Rodney P. Furr Treasurer Pamela K. Cox secretary Executive Director Fred P. Roessel, Jr., Ph.D. October 7, 1998 The Honorable Bob L. Johnson, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors PO Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Mr. Johnson: c,e/ -4q Blue Ridge Community Services would like to request time on the agenda of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting on Tuesday, October 27, 1998, to give a brief report about the services provided to the residents of the County in Fiscal Year 1998. Rita Gliniecki, a resident of Roanoke County appointed as a Blue Ridge Community Services Board member at -large, will be presenting the report. She will be accompanied by Fred P. Roessel, Jr., Executive Director, Thomas Chapman, Director of Administration, and myself. We look forward to seeing you and the members of the Board of Supervisors on October 27. Thank you for your consideration. 4S' cerely, thy 4el. York Administrative Assistant c: Elmer C. Hodge ✓ John M. Chambliss, Jr. Rita Gliniecki Fred P. Roessel, Jr. Thomas Chapman Executive Offices - 301 Elm Avenue, SW Roanoke, Virginia 24016-4001 (540) 345-9841 Fax: (540) 342-3855 TDD: (540) 345-0690 Serving the Cities of Roanoke and Salem, and the Counties of Botetourt, Craig and Roanoke Roanoke County Department of Community Development Memorandum TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Terrance L. Harrington, AICP DATE: September 8, 1998 RE: Delay in Public Hearing for US Cellular Special Use Permit for Broadcasting Tower 9 1998 At their meeting on September 1, 1998 the Planning Commission re -scheduled their public hearing on this request for October 6, 1998. Prior to their meeting, the staff advised the Commission that all of the adjoining property owners were not properly notified of the pending request. As such, a legal hearing could not be held on September 1st. The Board's scheduled September 22, 1998 hearing on this request will be canceled, and a new hearing will be scheduled for October 27th. Please let me know if you have any questions. c: Paul Mahoney Mary Allen ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNINr, nnMMi�ginm nr;FNnA TUESDAY, SEP WORK SESSION: 3:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: 7:00 P. ❑ Read Please... ❑ Handle ['Approve WORK SESSION: And... A. Call to Order ❑ Forward ❑ Return B. Approval of Agenda ❑ Keep or Recycle ❑ Review with Me OUTING & RQU T� C. Approval of Minutes: August 4, 1998 D. Consent Agenda: October 6, 1998 From: Post4t® 7664 03M 1995 Date- 1. Petition of David & Lucy Downs to obtain a Special Use Permit to operate a bed and breakfast from an existing home, located at 5209 Catawba Valley Drive, Catawba Magisterial District. 2. Petition of Mark Hough to obtain a Special Use Permit to develop and operate a used automobile dealership, located in the 3100 block of Brambleton Avenue, Windsor Hills Magisterial District. E. Community Plan Discussion: Comments from Lee Eddy and Home Builders F. Site Viewing G. Adjournment for Dinner EVENING SESSION: ' r H. Call to Order Invocation/Pledge of Allegiance: Todd Ross dr° J. Public Hearing Petitions: 1. Petition of US Cellular to obtain a Special Use Permit to construct a 100 ft. cellular monopole tower and support building, located on Catawba Valley Drive, 0.75 mile west of Oakey-Dolon Rd, Catawba Magisterial District. K. Final Orders L. Citizens' Comments M. Comments of Planning Commissioners and Planning Staff N. Adjournment Present: Absent: WORK SESSION: ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - AUGUST 4, 1998 Mr. Don Witt, Chairman Mr. Todd Ross Ms. Martha Hooker Mr. Kyle Robinson Mr. Terry Harrington, Secretary Ms. Carol Rizzio, Messrs. Tim Beard, David Holladay and John Murphy Mr. Pete Haislip Mr. Al Thomason Ms. Martha Hooker (work session) Mr. Witt called the meeting to order at 3:05 p.m. Approval of Agenda Mr. Ross moved approval of the agenda. The motion carried unanimously. Approval of Minutes Mr. Robinson moved to approve the minutes of June 2, June 16, and July 7, 1998 which carried unanimously. Gateway Mr. Harrington described the nature and scope of the gateway median program. Mr. Haislip outlined the work that is performed by his department which does not include watering of the landscaped areas. The Commission instructed staff to secure a permanent water supplier for the areas and indicated they would like to see more color, i.e., flowers. Mr. Witt pointed out that we need to enhance the existing sites; not add additional gateway areas. Comments The Commission discussed the need to consider proffered conditions for the commercial rezoning request at Brambleton and Electric Road. It was agreed that they would reconvene on the 17th to take action on the request. Site Viewing The meeting was adjourned at 3:45 p.m. in order to view the sites. PUBLIC HEARING: Mr. Witt called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. He gave the invocation and led the pledge of allegiance. 1. Petition of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to rezone approximately 20 acres from R-1, R-2 and C-2 conditional to C-2, General Commercial for the purpose of general retail and service uses, located in the vicinity of Brambleton Avenue (Route 221) and Electric Road (Route 419), Cave Spring Magisterial District. The Chairman introduced Elmer Hodge, County Administrator, who provided additional information about the request. Mr. Hodge stated that the site is for a large retail store such as a Home Depot, and the staff report is based on this assumption. 2 Mr. Witt stated that the information for the request was acquired rather quickly and the Commission has not had sufficient time to consider the ramifications of the proposal. He announced that following citizens' comments on the request, he will make a motion to delay action on the rezoning until August 17 in order to allow the Commission time to consider additional information and concerns of the citizens. Mr. Harrington summarized the staff report and pointed out that specifics regarding the nature, scale and design of the use is not available for the Commission to consider in evaluation of the request. Doug Basham, Betty Mengel, Suzanne Seth, Christine Vaughan, Vernon Jolley, Lee Eddy, Robert Hearn, and Laurie Peery expressed opposition to the request. Specific concerns cited included traffic on Route 419, impact on adjacent and surrounding residential communities, effect on vitality of other small businesses in the Brambleton/419 Corridor, safety of children on Westmoreland, lighting impacts, noise impacts, the loss of the last black neighborhood in southwest county and crime impacts. Several residents stated that a cul-de-sac on Westmoreland was critical if access to Westmoreland was approved. One resident expressed concern for the integrity of the water system on View Avenue, expressing fear that it would be endangered by the development. One citizen also expressed the following concerns: the secrecy of the request and the speed with which it is progressing, the lack of a traffic study, and the need for proffered conditions. Mr. Witt stated that he will be considering this as a rezoning request for a Home Depot retail store and no other C-2 use. He requested that it be sent back to the Commission if some other use is proposed. He then moved that the public hearing for this item be closed and that a work session for further discussion and action be held on August 17, 1998 at 3:OOpm. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Robinson, Ross, Hooker, Witt NAYS: None ABSENT: Thomason 2. Petition of Robert and Elaine Lewis for a Special Use Permit to allow an accessory apartment in a R-1, single family, zoning district located at 1714 Millbridge Road, Catawba Magisterial District. Mr. Beard presented an overview of the staff report. The Commission asked the reason for limiting the height of the apartment and if new owners purchase the home, could it become a rental unit. Mr. Beard stated that the height limitation is to lessen visual impact on neighboring properties and it would be possible to lease out the apartment. Mrs. Lewis responded to questions from the Commission as follows: insufficient arrangements for elderly parents; all the bedrooms are on the second floor and there is no full bath on the first floor; have resided at this location for six years. Ms. Hooker moved to recommend approval of the petition with the following conditions: 1) Height of the accessory apartment shall be limited to one story; 2) Exterior materials will match those of the existing house; 3) Apartment will be occupied by family members only. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Robinson, Ross, Hooker, Witt NAYS: None ABSENT: Thomason 3 3. Petition of North Roanoke Development Corp. to rezone 3.830 acres from C-1 to C-2 to construct an office/retail development, located on the east side of Route 419 across from intersection of Locke Street, Catawba Magisterial District. Ms. Rizzio presented a summary of the staff report which included recommended conditions pertaining to: buffering requirements, building materials and height, architecture, parking lot lighting, and signage. Ed Natt, attorney, presented the petition and proffered the following conditions: 1) The final site plan shall generally conform with the Master Site Development Plan for ARK Medical Center, prepared by Jerome Donald Henschel, dated June 5, 1998. 2) No access to either the development or to Route 419 shall be made from either Embassy Drive or Governor Drive. 3) Wherever possible existing vegetation shall be preserved and incorporated into the buffering requirements. Screening and buffering in that area of the development adjoining tax map 36.19-1-36 and -37 shall be Type D, Option 1, buffer yard with a 6-foot stockade fence plus Type E, buffer yard planting. In all other areas, screening and buffering shall comply with the provisions of the ordinance. 4) Building height shall be a maximum of 35 feet. 5) Parking lot light poles including fixtures shall not exceed 25 feet above grade. All parking lot lighting shall be down lit. 6) Freestanding signs shall be monument style and limited to two. No freestanding sign shall exceed 15' above grade. Combined square footage shall not exceed .5 feet for every 1 foot of road frontage. A Sign Allocation Plan shall be submitted for approval in conjunction with site plan review. Lighting for freestanding signs shall be with in -ground units or back lit. 7) Building materials and architecture shall be coordinated throughout the entire complex. 8) A minimum of one medium to large 1 1/s' caliper tree for every ten parking spaces shall be planted. Trees shall be planted within landscaped medians, peninsulas or planter islands designed in a way as to channel traffic, facilitate stormwater management and break up long expanses of parking areas. 9) No off -premises advertising signs shall be constructed on the property. Glenn Tabor inquired about the C-2 use that is being proposed. He expressed concern with noise, loss of privacy and the fact that C-2 zoning allows a wide range of uses. He stated that there was only 35 feet between the back of his house and the property line of the proposed C-2 use. His house is located on tax map number 36.19-1-36 (3105 Embassy Drive). The Commission inquired about the zoning classification of the property located behind the proposed site, stormwater management plan, hours of operation and buffer yard requirements. Staff responded that it is zoned R-1, single family residential and if approved, the parcel will again have two zoning classifications. The two detention ponds, for the proposed use, will minimize flooding problems in the immediate area. Todd Ross wanted more extensive buffering requirements along the property lines that adjoin existing residential homes. Ms. Hooker asked about the recommended proffers regarding lighting, signage and building height. Staff stated that they are more stringent than what is required by code. Mr. Robinson complimented Ms. Rizzio on the staff report. Ms. Hooker moved to recommend approval of the petition with proffered conditions. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Robinson, Ross, Hooker, Witt NAYS: None ABSENT: Thomason 4. Petition of The Hertz Corp. to obtain a Special Use Permit to operate a used automobile dealership, located at 5423 Williamson Road, Hollins Magisterial District. 4 Mr. Witt asked about the condition for a VDOT commercial entrance permit and if site plan review is required. Staff responded that the commercial entrance permit will be required and the condition will support the requirement. Staff also responded that a sketch of the landscaping will be required for review, but no other site plan review will be required. Mr. Ross moved to recommend approval of the petition with the following conditions: 1) The required landscape planting strip between the vehicle display area and the street right of way shall be designed and built to establish a controlled commercial entrance which meets Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) standards. 2) A VDOT commercial entrance permit shall be required. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Robinson, Ross, Hooker, Witt NAYS: None ABSENT: Thomason 5. Petition of Virginia Varsity Transfer Inc. to rezone 5.4 acres from 1-2 to 1-1 and obtain a Special Use Permit to construct a mini -warehouse, located in the 5800 block of Starkey Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District. Mr. Murphy summarized the staff report. John Lugar presented the petition and proffered the following condition: The buildings and doors to the storage buildings will not be the colors red or orange. Mr. Ross asked the applicant to describe the various phases of the project. Mr. Lugar, president of Virginia Varsity, discussed the phasing for the project and the proposed color scheme envisioned. Mr. Witt moved to recommend approval of the petition with the proffered condition. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Robinson, Ross, Hooker, Witt NAYS: None ABSENT: Thomason Final Orders At its July meeting, the Board of Supervisors approved the petition of Cicero Hall. Comments Mr. Harrington commented that he will have conference tables brought in for the work session on August 17. Mr. Witt stated that the Commission will allow comments from citizens at the session pertaining to the Home Depot rezoning request. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Approved: Secretary, Roanoke County Planning Commission