Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout3/9/1999 - Regular~~~~~ ~ pOAN ,Y~ a ~: ~ . ~ :• ~ 1Y 38 ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION AGENDA ~, MARCH 9, 1999 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. The meetings are broadcast live on RVTV, Channel 3, and will be rebroadcast on Thursdays at 7 P.M. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement in order to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings or other programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County, please contact the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772-2005. We request that you provide at least 48-hours notice so that proper arrangements may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call FFH ABSENT AT 3:01 P.M. 2. Invocation: Gardner W. Smith Deputy Assistant for Citizen Services 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS ECH ANNOUNCED WORK SESSION ON I-81 WIDENING IS POSTPONED FOR 30 DAYS (4/13/99) BECAUSE OF FFH ABSENCE PMM - ADDED EXECUTIVE SESSION ON DISPOSITION OF PUBLIC i ® Recycled Paper PROPERTY -WELL LOT, AND ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY -SALEM OFFICE SUPPLY AND ACCESS TO WOODS END SITE. BLJ ASKED MHA TO CONTACT ROANOKE CITY CLERK TO RESCHEDULE JOINT MEETING WITH CITY COUNCIL. C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS NONE D. BRIEFINGS NONE E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request to adopt a prioritized list of Primary and Interstate projects to be presented in the pre-allocation public hearing for the Commonwealth Transportation Board FY 1999-2005 Six Year Improvement Program. (Arnold Covey, Director of Community Development) R-030999-1 JPM MOTION TO ADOPT RESO AS AMENDED URC WITH FFH ABSENT 2. Request for authorization to enter into a Memorandum of Agreement with the National Park Service, the Federal Highway Administration and Virginia's Explore Park for design and construction funds for the Blue Ridge Parkway Orientation/Interpretation Center. (Joyce Waugh, Assistant Director of Economic Development) A-030999-2 HCN MOTION TO AUTHORIZE ENTERING INTO MEMO OF AGREEMENT URC WITH FFH ABSENT 3. Request to establish the tax rates in Roanoke County for calendar year 1999. 2 a. Order setting the tax rate on real estate for the calendar year 1999. (Brent Robertson, Budget Manager) 0-030999-3 BLJ MOTION TO ADOPT ORDER SETTING TAX RATE AT $1.13 URC WITH FFH ABSENT b. Order setting the tax levy on all classes of personal property and machinery and tools for the calendar year 1999. (Brent Robertson, Budget Manager) 0-030999-4 BLJ MOTION TO ADOPT ORDER SETTING PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX RATE AT $3.50 AND MACHINERY AND TOOLS TAX RATE OF $3.00 URC WITH FFH ABSENT 4. Request from School Board for approval of a reimbursement agreement in order to accept grants from the Commonwealth of Virginia to purchase Student Management Software. (Dr. Jane James, Director of Technology) A-030999-5 HOM MOTION TO APPROVE REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT URC WITH FFH ABSENT 5. Consideration of a Gain Sharing Agreement with the Town of Vinton and submittal of the agreement to the Commission on Local Government (Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator and Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney) R-030999-6 HCN MOTION TO ADOPT RESO AND SUBMIT AGREEMENT TO COLG URC WITH FFH ABSENT F. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. First reading of ordinance authorizing the conveyance of a 37.86 acre parcel of real estate located in the City of Salem known as the Lloyd property. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND AND PH - 3/23/99 URC WITH FFH ABSENT JPM SUGGESTED AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE FOR 2ND READING 3 2. First reading of ordinance to vacate as public right-of-way a portion of Garman Road recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 51, located in the Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Roanoke County and Kroger Company. (Arnold Covey, Director of Community Development) BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND AND PH - 3123/99 URC WITH FFH ABSENT 3. First reading of ordinance to vacate as public rights-of-way Washington Road recorded in Plat Book 1, page 363, Pinkard Court Subdivision in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. (Arnold Covey, Director of Community Development) HOM MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND AND PH - 3123199 URC WITH FFH ABSENT 4. First reading of ordinance to vacate a portion of a 15-foot drainage easement on plat showing section no. 1, Edgemont of Vinton, plat book 16, pg 41, and further shown on lot 5, block 3, section 2, Edgemont of Vinton, plat book 18, page 130, and revised plat of section 2, Edgemont of Vinton, plat book 18, page 171, in the Vinton Magisterial District (tax map no. 61.02-7- 1). (Arnold Covey, Director of Community Development) HCN MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND AND PH - 3/23/99 URC WITH FFH ABSENT 5. First reading of ordinance authorizing construction of and financing for a Local Public Works Improvement Project -Little Brushy Mountain Water Project. (Gary Robertson, Utility Director) HCN MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND - 3/23199 4 AYES-JPM, HOM, HCN ABSENT-FFH ABSTAIN-BLJ 6. First reading of ordinance declaring a parcel of real estate to be surplus and accepting an offer for the sale of same; namely the Penn Forest Boulevard well lot. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) HOM MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND AND PH - 3/23199 URC WITH FFH ABSENT G. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Second reading of ordinance authorizing quitclaim and release of a 20-foot water line easement within the boundaries of Belmont Court and located between Lot 1, Block 1, Section 2, and Lots 12 and 13, Block 1, Section 2 of Triple Crown Estates in the Vinton Magisterial District. (Arnold Covey, Community Development Director) 0-030999-7 HCN MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC WITH FFH ABSENT 2. Second reading of ordinance amending Ordinance 090997-5 authorizing the creation of and financing for a Local Public Works Improvement Project, Mountain Heights Water Project. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) ACTION DELAYED UNTIL AFTER WORK SESSION H. APPOINTMENTS BLJ NOMINATED ART WHITTAKER TO A 4-YEAR TERM ON THE AIRPORT COMMISSION. 1. League of Older Americans Advisory Council 5 2. Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission 3. Commission for Senior and Physically Challenged Citizens HOM ADVISED HE WILL HAVE NOMINATIONS AND WILL FORWARD TO CLERK TO BE INCLUDED IN 3/23/99 CONSENT AGENDA. I. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. R-030999-8 BLJ MOTION TO ADOPT CONSENT RESO URC WITH FFH ABSENT 1. Approval of Minutes -February 9, 1999 2. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Canterbury Park, Section II. A-030999-8.a 3. Acceptance of donation of drainage easements to the Board of Supervisors in connection with the development of Edgemont of Vinton, Section 2, located in the Vinton Magisterial District. A-030999-8. b 4. Resolution requesting that the Virginia Department of Transportation add into the secondary system of state highways a new portion of Route 929 (Garman Road) and abandon a portion of Route 929 (Garman Road) which no longer serves the public need. R-030999-8.c 6 5. Donation of a 20 foot drainage easement and a new variable width drainage easement in Orchard Park, Section 2, by F & W Community Development Corporation. A-030999-8.d 6. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Summertield, Section 7. A-030999-8.e 7. Request for approval of a Comprehensive Stormwater Detention Agreement with the Virginia Department of Transportation. R-030999-8.f J. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS WORK SESSION ON I-81 WIDENING WILL BE HELD 4/13/99 K. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS NONE L. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS Nancv Hushes, 2506 Sharmar spoke on the need for a traffic signal at Hidden Valley Middle School and advised that they had met 6 of 11 warrants required by VDOT. M. REPORTS HOM MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE -UVV WITH FFH ABSENT 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Future School Capital Reserve 5. Update of 1999-2000 budget calendar as of March 9, 1999 N. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS Supervisor McNamara: (1) Advised that at the March 23 meeting, there will be a number of public hearings including the Special Use Permit for the Woods End Site, proposed rezoning on land at 419-Brambleton, a work session with the School Board and reguests from agencies for contributions. He asked if there was consideration to moving the meeting. H advised that it was very difficult to change meeting places because of all the issues involved in moving. Supervisor Minnix: (11 Asked ECH to find out about the mulch problems. ECH responded he would discuss his findings with HOM after the meeting. ~2~Asked Arnold Covey to investigate whether it was a zoning violation to park a vehicle in the front xard on the grass. AC will investigate and report back. (3) Asked Terry Harrington to meet with him to review the proffered conditions attached to the Sunscape Apartment rezoning_ Supervisor Nickens: (11 Announced that there would be a Board meeting with Congressman Goodlatte on August 10 and asked ECH to brief the Congressman on the possible closing of the Vinton Post Office. He reported that letters have been received advising that there are no plans to vacate the post office. Supervisor Johnson: (1) Explained that he inquired whether members of the Airport Commission could be compensated but was informed bx their legal counsel that compensation was not included in the General Assembly legislation establishing the commission. He asked PMM to meet with the Airport counsel to look at the possibility of establishing compensation for the commission members. O. WORK SESSIONS (4TH FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM) 1. Update on Widening of Interstate 81. (Gardner Smith) POSTPONED TO APRIL 13, 1999 2. Budget Work Session -debts and revenues (Brent Robertson) BRENT ROBERTSON UPDATED BOARD ON REVENUE FIGURES FOR 1998- 99 AND PROPOSED REVENUE FOR 1999-2000. DIANE HYATT PRESENTED A WORK SHEET SHOWING PROPOSED REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES FOR THE 1999-2000 BUDGET FOR COUNTY AND SCHOOLS. STAFF TO BRING BACK REVISED FIGURES ON 3/23/99 3. Discussion on financing options for Public Works Improvement Projects (Gary Robertson) GARY ROBERTSON PRESENTED OPTIONS FOR FINANCING PUBLIC WORK IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS. BOARD CONSENSUS TO APPROVE GRISSO REQUEST AND TO BRING BACK A POLICY IN 30 DAYS (4/13199) THAT INCLUDES: INTEREST RATE, TERM OF LOAN THAT WOULD COVER MOST SITUATIONS, AND PENALTY FOR THOSE WHO DON'T PARTICIPATE IN THE BEGINNING OF THE PROJECT. OUT OF WORK SESSION AND RETURNED TO OPEN SESSION TO TAKE ACTION AT 5:30 P.M. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES (POSTPONED UNTIL AFTER WORK SESSION) 2. Second reading of ordinance amending Ordinance 090997-5 authorizing the creation of and financing for a Local Public Works Improvement Project, Mountain Heights Water Project. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 0-030999-9 HCN MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC WITH FFH ABSENT P. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (3) acquisition of real estate for public purposes, Salem Office Supply and access road to Woods End school site, and (2.1-344 A (3) disposition of publicly held real estate -well lot. BLJ MOTION TO GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION FOLLOWING WORK SESSIONS 9 URC WITH FFH ABSENT EXECUTIVE SESSION HELD FROM 6:30 P.M. TO 7:35 P.M. Q. CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION R-030999-10 BLJ MOTION TO RETURN TO OPEN SESSION AT 7.35 P M AND ADOPT CERTIFICATION RESO -URC WITH FFH ABSENT R. ADJOURNMENT BLJ ADJOURNED MEETING AT 7:37 P.M. io O~ aOANp~.~ ~ A ~ ~ a ~~~~~ 1838 ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA MARCH 9, 1999 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. The meetings are broadcast live on RVTV, Channel 3, and will be rebroadcast on Thursdays at 7 P.M. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement in order to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings or other programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County, please contact the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772-2005. We request that you provide at least 48-hours notice so that proper arrangements may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call 2. Invocation: Gardner W. Smith Deputy Assistant for Citizen Services 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS D. BRIEFINGS i ® Recycled Paper E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request to adopt a prioritized list of Primary and Interstate projects to be presented in the pre-allocation public hearing for the Commonwealth Transportation Board FY 1999-2005 Six Year Improvement Program. (Arnold Covey, Director of Community Development) 2. Request to approve a Memorandum of Agreement with the National Park Service, the Federal Highway Administration and Virginia's Explore Park for design and construction funds for the Blue Ridge Parkway Orientation/Interpretation Center. (Joyce Waugh, Assistant Director of Economic Development) 3. Request to establish the tax rates in Roanoke County for calendar year 1999. a. Order setting the tax rate on real estate for the calendar year 1999. (Brent Robertson, Budget Manager) b. Order setting the tax levy on all classes of personal property and machinery and tools for the calendar year 1999. (Brent Robertson, Budget Manager) 4. Request from School Board for approval of a reimbursement agreement in order to accept grants from the Commonwealth of Virginia to purchase Student Management Software. (Dr. Jane James, Director of Technology) 5. Consideration of a Gain Sharing Agreement with the Town of Vinton and submittal of the agreement to the Commission on Local Government (Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator and Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney) F. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. First reading of ordinance authorizing the conveyance of a 37.86 acre parcel of real estate located in the City of Salem known as the Lloyd property. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 2. First reading of ordinance to vacate as public right-of-way a a portion of Garman Road recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 51, located in the Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Roanoke County and Kroger Company. (Arnold Covey, Director of Community Development) 3. First reading of ordinance to vacate as public rights-of-way Washington Road recorded in Plat Book 1, page 363, Pinkard Court Subdivision in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. (Arnold Covey, Director of Community Development) 4. First reading of ordinance to vacate a portion of a 15-foot drainage easement on plat showing section no. 1, Edgemont of Vinton, plat book 16, pg 41, and further shown on lot 5, block 3, section 2, Edgemont of Vinton, plat book 18, page 130, and revised plat of section 2, Edgemont of Vinton, plat book 18, page 171, in the Vinton Magisterial District (tax map no. 61.02-7- 1). (Arnold Covey, Director of Community Development) 5. First reading of ordinance authorizing construction of and financing for a Local Public Works Improvement Project -Little Brushy Mountain Water Project. (Gary Robertson, Utility Director) 6. First reading of ordinance declaring a parcel of real estate to be surplus and accepting an offer for the sale of same; namely the Penn Forest Boulevard well lot. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) G. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Second reading of ordinance authorizing quitclaim and release of a 20-foot water line easement within the boundaries of Belmont Court and located between Lot 1, Block 1, Section 2, and Lots 12 and 13, Block 1, Section 2 of Triple Crown Estates in the Vinton Magisterial District. (Arnold Covey, Community Development Director) 2. Second reading of ordinance amending Ordinance 090997-5 authorizing the creation of and financing for a Local Public 3 Works Improvement Project, Mountain Heights Water Project. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) H. APPOINTMENTS 1. League of Older Americans Advisory Council 2. Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission 3. Commission for Senior and Physically Challenged Citizens I. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT A ENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Approval of Minutes -February 9, 1999 2. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Canterbury Park, Section II. 3. Acceptance of donation of drainage easements to the Board of Supervisors in connection with the development of Edgemont of Vinton, Section 2, located in the Vinton Magisterial District. 4. Resolution requesting that the Virginia Department of Transportation add into the secondary system of state highways a new portion of Route 929 (Garman Road) and abandon a portion of Route 929 (Garman Road) which no longer serves the public need. 5. Donation of a 20 foot drainage easement and a new variable width drainage easement in Orchard Park, Section 2, by F & W Community Development Corporation. 6. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Summertield, Section 7. 4 7. Request for approval of a Comprehensive Stormwater Detention Agreement with the Virginia Department of Transportation. J. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS K. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS L. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS M. REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Future School Capital Reserve 5. Update of 1999-2000 budget calendar as of March 9, 1999 N. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS O. WORK SESSIONS (4TH FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM) 1. Update on Widening of Interstate 81. (Gardner Smith) 2. Budget Work Session -debts and revenues (Brent Robertson) 3. Discussion on financing options for Public Works Improvement Projects (Gary Robertson) P. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (3) acquisition of real estate for public purposes. Q. CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION R. ADJOURNMENT 5 ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 9, 1999. RESOLUTION 030999-1 REQUESTING VDOT TO CONTINUE FUNDING PROJECTS CURRENTLY ON THE PLAN AND ADOPT THOSE PROJECTS IDENTIFIED AS "PROJECTS NOT ON PLAN" FOR INCLUSION INTO THE 1999- 2005 PRIMARY AND INTERSTATE SIX YEAR IMPROVEMENT PLAN WHEREAS, the Six Year Improvement Program is the Commonwealth Transportation Board's plan for identifying funds anticipated to be available for highway and other forms of transportation construction; and WHEREAS, this program is updated annually to assist in the allocation of federal and state funds for interstate, primary, and secondary roads. BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia as follows: 1. That the following projects identified as "Projects on Plan" are recommended to continue to receive funding for planning and construction; and • Interstate 73 - Roanoke County, VA strongly reiterates it's prior recommendation to build I-73 and that the selected corridor for I-73 immediately follow the existing corridor of Route 220 into the City of Roanoke and then overlap Interstate 581, Interstate 81, the proposed "Smart Road" and Route 460 to the West Virginia state line near Narrows; and looks forward to reviewing the Transportation Board and Consultant's preliminary environmental impact study and cost estimate for the proposed alignments within the Route 220 corridor. • Interstate 81 -Roanoke County is very supportive of the Virginia Department of Transportation's proposed plan to increase the number of north and south travel lanes. We look forward to reviewing the prioritized segments of I-81 and want to continue to work with local VDOT staff to 1 develop regional cooperation of stormwater detention facilities and potential utility crossings. Route 11/460 (West Main Street) -Roanoke County is pleased this section of road made the Commonwealth's Transportation Board six-year Improvement Program and we continue to support the funding necessary to complete this necessary widening. The commercial and residential development projected to occur within this area will place additional demands on the road system that is currently providing an inadequate service level. Current traffic counts for this section show approximately 15,000 vehicles per day. Route 220 S (Bridge Replacement) -Roanoke County is supportive of this project and look forward to its completion. Current traffic counts for this section show approximately 20,000 vehicles per day. Route 221 (Bent Mountain Road) -Roanoke County is requesting continued allocation of funds for this 2.3-mile road project. The residential development projected to occur within this area will place additional demands on the road system that is currently providing an inadequate service level. Current traffic counts for this section show approximately 12,000 vehicles per day. • Route 311 (Catawba Valley Road) -Intersection Improvements, are scheduled to begin sometime this year at the overlook Rte 864 in conjunction with National Park Service. 2. That the following projects identified as "Projects Not on Plan" have been identified by the Board of Supervisors as extremely important to the growth of Roanoke County or for safety improvements and are requested to be included in the VDOT Six Year Improvements Program for the 1999-05 Fiscal Year. They are listed in priority order. 1. Route 11 (Williamson Road) Need: Now that Route 11 has been widened from Plantation Road (Rte. 115) to Hollins College, there remains one section of three lane road from 2 Peters Creek Road (Rte. 117) to the Roanoke City Limits. Additionally, the existing bridge over Carvins Creek does not meet current standards, and the alignment of Florist Road with Route 11 creates additional congestion and safety concerns. The existing section of road, 1.52 miles, is currently a three-lane with the center lane used for turning movements. Ninety percent of the tracts adjacent to Williamson Road are developed for commercial use. Traffic counts: 15,000 vehicles per day from the Roanoke city limits to Peters Creek Road. This stretch of road has also been identified as an alternate route in the event of a blockage on I-81 /581. Recommended Improvements: A four-lane divided highway with appropriate cross over and turn lanes, which will complete improvement of Williamson Road from the city limits to the Botetourt County line. Cost: $12, 000, 000. 2 Route 115 (Plantation Roadl Need: The existing road, 2.43 miles, is two lanes with numerous side connections to residential neighborhoods. The road needs to be improved from Roanoke City limits north to Route 11. If full funding is not available, various spot improvements, such as turn lanes, alignment and grade improvements, would help with safety issues. Additional land is available along the road for future development, which will increase traffic and construction costs in the future. Traffic Counts: From the Roanoke city Limits to Williamson Road, 11,000 vehicles per day. Recommended Improvements: Four lane divided highway with appropriate turning lanes. Cost: $12, 000, 000 - $15, 000, 000. 3. Route 220S (Franklin Roadl Need: This section of 220 S is approximately 2.0 miles long and is a four- lane divided highway. Recently a traffic study was conducted for a commercial development and the report predicted a level of service D or F within the next of couple of years. Additional lanes and improved vertical alignment is required from Roanoke City limits south to Rte 668 (Yellow 3 Mountain Rd..). Spot improvements are needed now at the intersection 419 and 220 S. Traffic Counts: From the Roanoke City limits South is approximately 44,000 vehicles per day. Recommended Improvements: Additional lanes and intersection improvements. Cost: $5, 000, 000 - $8, 000, 000. 4. Route 116 (Jae Valley Road. Need: The Salem residency has notified staff that the bridge over Back Creek is in need of repair and we wish to offer our support for improvements to the approaches and bridge replacement. This road is serving the growing commuter traffic from Franklin County and recreational traffic to Smith Mountain Lake. Traffic Counts: From the Roanoke City limits South is approximately 4,000 vehicles per day. Recommended Improvements: Improve approaches and replace existing bridge. Cost: $3, 000, 000 - $4, 000, 000. 5. Route 311 (Catawba Valley Road) -Intersection Improvements Need: This area has experienced steady growth over the last several years and the congestion at this intersection has increased. 1 Traffic Counts: Rte 311 has an average daily traffic of 11,000 vpd and Bradshaw Road (Rte 864) carries approximately 3,200 vpd. Recommended Improvements: Construct a right hand passing lane (left turn lane). Other primary roads in Roanoke County which deserve consideration for spot improvements: 4 ROUTE 419 (ELECTRIC ROAD) INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS, ROUTE 118, (AIRPORT ROAD), ROUTE 24, (WASHINGTON AVENUE) IMPROVEMENTS AT THE INTERSECTION OF WILLIAM BYRD HIGH SCHOOL, ROUTE 460, (CHALLENGER AVE.), LEFT AND RIGHT TURN LANES AT SEVERAL EXISTING SECONDARY ROADS. On motion of Supervisor McNamara to adopt the resolution as amended, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Harrison A COPY TESTE: .~. Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Fred Altizer, District Engineer, VDOT The Honorable Shirley J. Ybarra, Secretary of Transportation The Honorable Robert E. Martinez, Chairman, Commonwealth Transportation Board Lorinda G. Lionberger, Salem District, Commonwealth Transportation Board Mayor David A. Bowers, City of Roanoke Roanoke Valley Delegation to the General Assembly Senator John Warner, U. S. Senate Senator Charles Robb, U. S. Senate Congressman Robert Goodlatte Congressman Frederick Boucher 5 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~+ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 9, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: REQUEST TO ADOPT A PRIORITIZED LIST OF PRIMARY AND INTERSTATE PROJECTS TO BE PRESENTED AT THE PRE- ALLOCATION PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE COMMONWEALTH TRANSPORTATION BOARD FY 99/05 SIX-YEAR IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: County staff is requesting the Board of Supervisors to adopt a list of Interstate and Primary projects to present to the Virginia Department of Transportation Board Pre- allocation Hearing for fiscal year 1999-05, on March 23, 1999, at the Salem Civic Center. BACKGROUND: The Six Year Improvement Program is the Commonwealth Transportation Board's plan for identifying funds anticipated to be available for highway and other forms of transportation construction for distribution in the 1999-2005 plan. This program is updated annually. As a part of the development of this program, the Transportation Board conducts public hearings in each of the nine construction districts in the state to receive input from members of the General Assembly, members of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, City Council members and members of the general public. Roanoke County is within the Salem District along with eleven (11) other counties and ten (10) cities. All are lobbying for these construction funds. 1 C _' These federal and state funds are allocated according to formulae as mandated by state and federal statutes for interstate, primary and urban roads. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Presently, there are eight budgeted projects in the six-year improvement program in Roanoke County. Projects On Plan: Interstate 73 -Three corridors have been identified and the VDOT is developing a preliminary phase I environmental impact study and cost estimate for each alignment. The study should be completed sometime later this year. At that time VDOT will hold several public meetings to discuss their findings and recommendations. Interstate 81 - VDOT recently published a final draft of the interchanges and proposed lane widths for Interstate 81. The Commonwealth Transportation Board (CTB) six-year improvement plan for FY98/99 has I-81 broken into four segments. However, the priorities and a construction date have not been determined at this time. Route 11/460 (West Main Street) PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING ONLY -This section of road has been added to the six-year plan and preliminary fieldwork has already been started. Only preliminary engineering and right of way are shown within the plan, no construction date is shown. Roanoke County will be requesting additional funding from the Commonwealth Transportation Board so this project can move forward as quickly as possible. Route 220 S (Reconstruct 1.3 MILES) -This section was recently completed; however, additional funds are required. Route 220 S, Bridge Replacement -The bridge over Norfolk and Southern Railway is scheduled to be replaced. Contract has been awarded and work should begin within the next couple of months. Route 221 (Brambleton Avenue) -Construction plans have been approved by the CTB and right of way is currently being acquired for section 1. Route 311 (Catawba Valley Drive), Spot improvement -Funds have been allocated for engineering in connection with the overlook at the top of Catawba Mountain. Route 419 (Electric Road) -Funds have been allocated to add aright-turn lane at Hidden Valley Drive. This project should be advertised within the next couple of months. VDOT is currently conducting another signal light study at this location. Also, VDOT has initiated a corridor study on Rte 419 from I- 81 to 220 Expressway to determine future improvements. The study should be completed within the next year or so. Roanoke County has two Transportation Equity Act for 21St Century (TEA-21) project listed in the current plan and they are outlined below: The Hanging Rock Battlefield Trail Phase I is under construction. Phase II is in preliminary design and property acquisition phase. Projects Not On Plan: Roanoke County requests the following five roads to be considered for inclusion in the interstate and primary six-year plan in the order presented: Route 11 (Williamson Road) -The widening of Rte. 11 North of Rte. 115 leaves a section of three lane road south of Rte. 115 to Roanoke City Corporate limits (existing five lane flush). There is significant congestion along this segment of road and the existing bridge structure is substandard. The district recently lowered the bridge capacity from a 25 to 20-ton weight limit over Carvins Creek. In addition, the acute alignment of Florist Road with Rte. 11 in the same vicinity creates additional congestion and safety concern. We believe that this work will compliment the proposed widening of Rte. 11 from Rte. 115 to Hollins College and have a major positive impact on the North County area. The existing section of road (1.92 miles) in question is a two-lane road with a median for turning movements. The alignment is fairly level except for a steep incline adjacent to Boxley Hills. The improvements would probably consist of a five lane flush highway with appropriate turning lanes with an estimated cost of approximately $10,000,000. Route 115 (Plantation Road) - We encourage the continuation of improvements north to Rte. 11; however, if funding is not available for the entire project, Roanoke County is asking consideration be given to additional spot improvements (turn lanes, alignment and grade improvements) at various locations. The existing road (2.43 miles) is a two-lane facility with numerous side connections to residential neighborhoods. Additional land is available for future development. The road is winding in spots with some minor grade changes. The average annual daily traffic estimates for Rte. 115 is approximately 15,000 vpd from Roanoke City Corporate limits to I-81. The improvements would probably consist of a five lane flush highway with appropriate turning lanes with an estimated cost of approximately C~+ $10,000,000. Route 220 S (from Rte. 419 to Buck Mountain Road) -This section of Rte. 220 is partially in Roanoke City and County. Development and traffic in this area has increased tremendously over the past couple of years. We request the Transportation Board review the possibility of adding additional lanes to handle the increasing traffic congestion in this area especially from the intersection of Rte 419 to Buck Mountain Road (Rte 679). Route 116 (Jae Valley Road), Bridge -- VDOT staff has informed us the bridge over Back Creek is in need of replacement. Route 311 (Catawba Valley Road) --Intersection improvements are needed at the intersection of Bradshaw Road (Rte 864). A left turn lane or passing lane needs to be constructed to reduce congestion and safety. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt the prioritized list of projects and resolution to be presented at the pre-allocation hearing on March 23, 1999. ITTED BY: Arnold Covey, Director Community Developme Approved ( ) Denied () _ Received (). Referred To ACTION Motion by: APPROVED BY: ~~~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator VOTE No Yes Abs Harrison _ Johnson Minnix McNamara Nickens 4 ~_, I AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 9, 1999. RESOLUTION REQUESTING VDOT TO CONTINUE FUNDING PROJECTS CURRENTLY ON THE PLAN AND ADOPT THOSE PROJECTS IDENTIFIED AS "PROJECTS NOT ON PLAN" FOR INCLUSION INTO THE 1999- 2005 PRIMARY AND INTERSTATE SIX YEAR IMPROVEMENT PLAN WHEREAS, the Six Year Improvement Program is the Commonwealth Transportation Board's plan for identifying funds anticipated to be available for highway and other forms of transportation construction; and WHEREAS, this program is updated annually to assist in the allocation of federal and state funds for interstate, primary, and secondary roads. BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia as follows: That the following projects identified as "Projects on Plan" are recommended to continue to receive funding for planning and construction; and Interstate 73 -Roanoke County is very supportive of this project through southwest Virginia and looks forward to reviewing the Transportation Board and Consultant's preliminary environmental impact study and cost estimate for the proposed alignments within the Route 220 corridor. Interstate 81 -Roanoke County is very supportive of the Virginia Department of Transportation's proposed plan to increase the number of north and south travel lanes. We look forward to reviewing the prioritized segments of I-81 and want to continue to work with local VDOT staff to develop regional cooperation of stormwater detention facilities and potential utility crossings. Route 11/460 (West Main Street) -Roanoke County is pleased this section of road made the Commonwealth's Transportation Board six-year Improvement Program and we continue to support the funding necessary to complete this necessary widening. The commercial and residential development projected to occur within this area will place additional demands on the road system that is currently providing an inadequate 1 ~__~ service level. Current traffic counts for this section show approximately 15,000 vehicles per day. Route 220 S (Bridge Replacement) -Roanoke County is supportive of this project and look forward to its completion. Current traffic counts for this section show approximately 20,000 vehicles per day. Route 221 (Bent Mountain Road) -Roanoke County is requesting continued allocation of funds for this 2.3-mile road project. The residential development projected to occur within this area will place additional demands on the road system that is currently providing an inadequate service level. Current traffic counts for this section show approximately 12,000 vehicles per day. Route 311 (Catawba Valley Road) -Intersection Improvements, are scheduled to begin sometime this year at the overlook Rte 864 in conjunction with National Park Service. 2. That the following projects identified as "Projects Not on Plan" have been identified by the Board of Supervisors as extremely important to the growth of Roanoke County or for safety improvements and are requested to be included in the VDOT Six Year Improvements Program for the 1999-05 Fiscal Year. They are listed in priority order. 1. Route 11 (Williamson Road) Need: Now that Route 11 has been widened from Plantation Road (Rte. 115) to Hollins College, there remains one section of three lane road from Peters Creek Road (Rte. 117) to the Roanoke City Limits. Additionally, the existing bridge over Carvins Creek does not meet current standards, and the alignment of Florist Road with Route 11 creates additional congestion and safety concerns. The existing section of road, 1.52 miles, is currently a three-lane with the center lane used for turning movements. Ninety percent of the tracts adjacent to Williamson Road are developed for commercial use. Traffic counts: 15,000 vehicles per day from the Roanoke city limits to Peters Creek Road. This stretch of road has also been identified as an alternate route in the event of a blockage on I-81/581. Recommended Improvements: A four-lane divided highway with appropriate cross over and turn lanes, which will complete improvement of 2 ~'- / Williamson Road from the city limits to the Botetourt County line. Cost: $12,000,000. 2. Route 115 (Plantation Road Need: The existing road, 2.43 miles, is two lanes with numerous side connections to residential neighborhoods. The road needs to be improved from Roanoke City limits north to Route 11. If full funding is not available, various spot improvements, such as turn lanes, alignment and grade improvements, would help with safety issues. Additional land is available along the road for future development, which will increase traffic and construction costs in the future. Traffic Counts: From the Roanoke city Limits to Williamson Road, 11,000 vehicles per day. Recommended Improvements: Four lane divided highway with appropriate turning lanes. Cost: $12,000,000 - $15,000,000. 3. Route 220S (Franklin Road Need: This section of 220 S is approximately 2.0 miles long and is a four- lane divided highway. Recently a traffic study was conducted for a commercial development and the report predicted a level of service D or F within the next of couple of years. Additional lanes and improved vertical alignment is required from Roanoke City limits south to Rte 668 (Yellow Mountain Rd). Spot improvements are needed now at the intersection 419 and 220 S. Traffic Counts: From the Roanoke City limits South is approximately 44,000 vehicles per day. Recommended Improvements: Additional lanes and intersection improvements. Cost: $5,000,000 - $8,000,000. 4. Route 116 (Jae Valley Road Need: The Salem residency has notified staff that the bridge over Back Creek is in need of repair and we wish to offer our support for improvements to the approaches and bridge replacement. This road is serving the growing commuter traffic from Franklin County and recreational traffic to Smith 3 .. ,,. Mountain Lake. Traffic Counts: From the Roanoke City limits South is approximately 4,000 vehicles per day. Recommended Improvements: Improve approaches and replace existing bridge. Cost: $3,000,000 - $4,000,000. 5. Route 311 (Catawba Valley Road) -Intersection Improvements Need: This area has experienced steady growth over the last several years and the congestion at this intersection has increased. 1 Traffic Counts: Rte 311 has an average daily traffic of 11,000 vpd and Bradshaw Road (Rte 864) carries approximately 3,200 vpd. Recommended Improvements: Construct a right hand passing lane (left turn lane). Other primary roads in Roanoke County which deserve consideration for spot improvements: ROUTE 419 (ELECTRIC ROAD) INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS, ROUTE 118, (AIRPORT ROAD), ROUTE 24, (WASHINGTON AVENUE) IMPROVEMENTS AT THE INTERSECTION OF WILLIAM BYRD HIGH SCHOOL, ROUTE 460, (CHALLENGER AVE.), LEFT AND RIGHT TURN LANES AT SEVERAL EXISTING SECONDARYS. A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Fred Altizer, District Engineer, VDOT The Honorable Shirley J. Ybarra, Secretary of Transportation and Chairman, Commonwealth Transportation Board Lorinda G. Lionberger, Salem District, Commonwealth Transportation Board ~- 4 ~, A-030999-2 Item No. ~~' O~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, 5204 BERNARD DRIVE, SW., ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: March 9, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: Request for authorization to enter into a Memorandum of Agreement with and among the National Park Service, Federal Highway Administration and Virginia's Explore Park to receive funds for the design and construction of the Blue Ridge Parkway Orientation/Interpretation Center. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: This is a great project and we are off to a good start. The Center will be important for tourism in the Roanoke Malley as well as a significant link to the Blue Ridge Parkway. Recommend approval. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The purpose of the Interpretive Center is to showcase the history of the Blue Ridge Parkway. The Center will also orient visitors to the facilities, recreation opportunities and visitor services, both on the Blue Ridge Parkway and in the surrounding region. This distinctive National Park Service facility (7-10,000 s.f.) will be staffed, maintained, and operated by non-federal regional entities. Roanoke County requested federal funds to design and construct a Blue Ridge Parkway Orientation/Interpretation Center to be located at the terminus of the Roanoke River Parkway on land owned by the Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority. To obtain these funds, which were awarded to the National Park Service and the Federal Highway Administration, Roanoke County must enter into a Memorandum of Agreement. These funds will help further this worthwhile regional project. BACKGROUND: Roanoke County has taken the lead on this project during the past several years to locate a National Park Service facility along the Blue Ridge Parkway to meet the needs of Parkway travelers and visitors to the region. The County has worked with a regional group and with Congressman Goodlatte and Senator Warner to obtain federal funds to plan, design, program and construct an Interpretive Center between the Arthur Taubman Welcome Center and the Brugh Tavern at Virginia's Explore Park. • •~ p~ The completion of a Memorandum of Agreement with and among participating entities will enable Roanoke County to move forward with this project once an architectural and engineering firm is selected for the design phase. This project represents an exciting partnership of public and non-profit organizations for the betterment of the greater Roanoke Valley region. FISCAL IMPACT: Current Funding Sources $529,800 Federal Highway Administration $250,000 National Park Service $50,000 Fifth District Regional Alliance 30 000 Roanoke County $859,800 The Memorandum of Agreement will serve as a tool for channeling the federal funds (FHWA and NPS) to the local government for design, program and construction on land at Virginia's Explore Park. The process for selecting an architectural and engineering firm is anticipated to be completed by mid-March. Once hard costs are determined, additional sources of funds may be needed from local and state governments and other non-federal sources for completion of construction and operations. ALTERNATIVES 1. Request authorization for the County Administrator to enter into a Memorandum of Agreement with and among the National Park Service, Federal Highway Administration and Virginia's Explore Park to receive funds for the design and construction of the Blue Ridge Parkway Orientation/Interpretation Center. 2. Do not authorize entering into a Memorandum of Agreement for the purpose of receiving funds for the design and construction of the Blue Ridge Parkway Orientation/Interpretation Center. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors authorize the County Administrator to enter into a Memorandum of Agreement, approved as to form by the County Attorney, with the National Park Service, Federal Highway Administration and Virginia's Explore Park to receive funds for the design and construction of the Blue Ridge Parkway Orientation/Interpretation Center. ~' Respectfully submitted: ~~ Joy W ugh, Assis t Director conomic Development Approved: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator E-a ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE No Yes Absent Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens to authorize Johnson _ x Denied () entering into memo of agreement Harrison _ _ x Received () McNamara- x Referred () Minnix _ x _ To () Nickens _ x cc: File Joyce Waugh, Assistant Director, Economic Development ~- ., e .. ~.~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 9, 1999 ORDER 030999-3 SETTING THE TAX RATE ON REAL ESTATE SITUATE IN ROANOKE COUNTY FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1999 BE IT ORDERED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the levy for the twelve-month period beginning January 1, 1999, and ending December 31, ................ ............... 1999, be, and hereby is, set for a tax rate of Per one hundred dollars of assessed valuation on all taxable real estate and mobile homes classified by §§ 58.1-3200, 58.1- 3201, and 58.1-3506.6 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, situate in Roanoke County. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the order setting the tax rate at $1.13, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Harrison A COPY TESTE: mod. Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Brent Robertson, Budget Manager John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue i t w ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~ "~-~~ ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUN'T'Y, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 9, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: Adoption of the Real Estate Tax Rate for the Calendar Year 1999. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS• SUMMARY OF INFORMATION• The Real Estate Tax Rate for the twelve-month period beginning January 1,1999, and ending December 31, 1999, was advertised on February 9, and 16, 1999 at $1.13 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation. The public hearing far citizen comment on the above advertised tax rate was held on February 23, 1999. STAFF RECOMMENDATION• The proposed budget for fiscal year 1999-00 is predicated on the current Real Estate Tax Rate; therefore, staff recommends that the Real Estate Tax Rate again be established at the rate of $1.13 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for the 1999 calendar year. Respectfully submitted, W. Brent Robe son Budget Manager Approved by, ~~~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION Approved () Motion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) VOTE No Yes Abs Harrison _, _ _ Johnson _ _ _ McNamara _, _ ,,_ Minnix _ _ _ Nickens C "~. GL AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGII~IIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMIhTISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 9, 1999 ORDER SETTING THE TAX RATE ON REAL ESTATE SITUATE IN ROANOKE COUNTY FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1999 BE IT ORDERED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the levy for the twelve-month period beginning January 1, 1999, and ending December 31, 1999, be, and hereby is, set for a tax rate of $1.13 per one hundred dollars of assessed valuation on all taxable real estate and mobile homes classified by §§ 58.1-3200, 58.1-3201, and 58.1-3506.8 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, situate in Roanoke County. U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\GENERAL\TAXRATE s AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 9, 1999 ORDER 030999-4 SETTING THE TAX LEVY ON ALL CLASSES OF PERSONAL PROPERTY SITUATE IN ROANOKE COUNTY FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1999 BE IT ORDERED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the levy for the twelve-month period beginning January 1, 1999, and ................ ending December 31, 1999, be, and hereby is, set for a tax rate of ''S~ per one hundred dollars of assessed valuation on all taxable, tangible personal property, excluding all those classes of household goods and personal effects as are defined in §§ 58.1-3504 and 58.1- 3505 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, but including the property separately classified by §§ 58.1-3500, 58.1-3501, 58.1-3502, 58.1-3506 in the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, of public service corporations based upon the assessed value thereof fixed by the State Corporation Commission and duly certified. 2. That there be, and hereby is, established as a separate class of personal property in Roanoke County those items of personal property set forth in § 58.1-3506 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and adopted by Ordinance No. 121592-11, and generally designated as Motor Vehicles for Disabled Veterans. 3. That the levy for the twelve-month period beginning January 1, 1999, and ending December 31, 1999, be, and hereby is, set at fifty (50%) percent of the tax rate established in paragraph 1 for the taxable, tangible personal property as herein established as a separate classification for tax purposes and as more fully defined by § 1 58.1-3506 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and generally designated as Motor Vehicles for Disabled Veterans. 4. That there be, and hereby is, established as a separate class of personal property in Roanoke County those items of personal property set forth in § 58.1-3507 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and generally designated as machinery and tools. 5. That the levy for the twelve-month period beginning January 1, 1999, and ................ ending December 31, 1999, be, and hereby is, set for a tax rate of ~~~? per one hundred dollars of assessed valuation on all taxable, tangible personal property as herein established as a separate classification for tax purposes and as more fully defined by § 58.1-3507 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and generally designated as machinery and tools. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the order setting the personal property tax rate at $3.50 and machinery and tools tax rate at $3.00, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Harrison A COPY TESTE: - C~~-G~¢~,cJ Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Brent Robertson, Budget Manager John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~~ ~,~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 9, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: Adoption of the Personal Property and Machinery and Tools Tax Rates for the Calendar Year 1999. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: e~(~,pyrs~y7s.«•I~ SLJ~yIlyiARY OF INFORMATION: The Personal Property Tax Rate for the twelve-month period begirming January 1, 1999, and ending December 31, 1999, was advertised on February 9, and 16, 1999 at $3.50 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation. The Machinery and Tools Tax Rate was also advertised on the above dates at $3.00 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation. The public hearing for citizen comment on the above advertised tax rates was held on February 23, 1999. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The proposed budget for fiscal year 1999-00 is predicated on the current Personal Property and Machinery and Tools Tax Rates; therefore, staff recommends that the Personal Property Tax Rate again be established at the rate of $3.50 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation and the Machinery and Tools Tax Rate at $3.00 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for the 1999 calendar year. Respectfully submitted, W. Brent Ro rtson Budget Manager Approved by, ~i~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator - ~. G7 ACTION Approved () Motion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) VOTE No Yes Abs Harrison _ _ ._ Johnson _ _ _ McNamara _ _ _ Minnix _ _ _ Nickens _ _ _ ~-3 h AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 9, 1999 ORDER SETTING THE TAX LEVY ON ALL CLASSES OF PERSONAL PROPERTY SITUATE IN ROANOKE COUNTY FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1999 BE IT ORDERED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the levy for the twelve-month period beginning January 1, 1999, and ending December 31, 1999, be, and hereby is, set for a tax rate of $3.50 per one hundred dollars of assessed valuation on all taxable, tangible personal property, excluding all those classes of household goods and personal effe~~s as are defined in §§ 58.1-3504 and 58.1-3505 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, but including the property separately classified by §§ 58.1-3500, 58.1-3501, 58.1-3502, 58.1-3506 in the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, of public service corporations based upon the assessed value thereof fixed by the State Corporation Commission and duly certified. 2. That there be, and hereby is, established as a separate class of personal property in Roanoke County those items of personal property set forth in § 58.1-3506 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and adopted by Ordinance No. 121592-11, and generally designated as Motor Vehicles for Disabled Veterans. 3. That the levy for the twelve-month period beginning January 1, 1999, and ending December 31, 1999, be, and hereby is, set at fifty (50%) percent of the tax rate established in paragraph 1 for the taxable, tangible personal property as herein established as a separate classification for tax purposes and as more fully defined by § 58.1-3506 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and generally designated as Motor Vehicles for Disabled Veterans. 4. That there be, and hereby is, established as a separate class of personal property in Roanoke County those items of personal property set forth in § 58.1-3507 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and generally designated as machinery and tools. 5. That the levy for the twelve-month period beginning January 1, 1999, and ending December ~~.//~ 31, 1999, be, and hereby is, set for a tax rate of $3.00 per one hundred dollars of assessed valuation on all taxable, tangible personal property as herein established as a separate classification for tax purposes and as more fully defined by § 58.1-3507 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and generally designated as machinery and tools. U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\GENERAL\TAXRATE.PP ACTYON ~~ A-030999-5 zTEM NUMBER ~ . ~'+'~FTING _L?~.TF' : March a ~ 1 ~ 9 9 AGENDI~ITF~: Rc+:~uest from Nchool. 8aard fvx' r®solution to rw7 mhurse itself from State grant for student management software. {~ R' NT ~,~CKGROUNll: The lyy9 Virginia Geiisial Assembly approved funding to be allocated by the Virginia soard of Education to certain school da.visions far student management soECware. Rad~lukc County~s portion of the giant is expected to be up Co $305,000. A resolution is needed to purchase prior to the sale of bonds. S Y OF INFORMATION: The grant will be used to purchase SULLWd.i:C for student management. FISCAL IM~'ACT: None. This funding is contained in the ly9d-y~ operating budget. STAFF RECQIHME.~ATYON: Staff recommends resolution to purchase student ma,rlar~eman.t enft~ws~re immediately and reimburse the School Board from grant funds. Dr. Jan James Director of Twchnolvgy Elmer C. Hodge C"nt~n.ty Administrator ACTION VOTE No Yes Absent Approved (x) Motion by: H. Odell Minnix to approve Johnson _ x Denied ( ) reimbursement agreement Harrison _ _ x Received ( ) McNamara- x Referred ( ) Minnix _ x To ( ) Nickens _ x _ cc: File Dr. Jane James, Director of Technology Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Dr. Deanna Gordon, School Superintendent Brenda Chastain, Clerk, School Board ~-y FROM THE MINUTES OF THE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE COUNTY MEETING IN REGULAR SESSION AT 8:30 AM ON March 5, 1999 IN THE BOARD ROOM OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES. RESOLUTION OF THE SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE COUNTY DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO REIMBURSE ITSELF FROM THE PROCEEDS OF ONE OR MORE GRANTS MADE BY THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA FOR CERTAIN EXPENDITURES TO BE MADE IN CONNECTION WITH THE ACQUISITION SOFTWARE FOR STUDENT MANAGEMENT. WHEREAS, Roanoke County Public Schools (the "Division") is a political subdivision organized and existing under the laws of the State of Virginia; and WHEREAS, the Division will pay, after the date hereof, certain expenditures (the"Expenditures") in connection with the acquisition of software for student management; WHEREAS, the Roanoke County School Board of the Division (the "Board") has determined that the money to be advanced on and after the date hereof to pay the Expenditures are available only for a temporary period and it is necessary to reimburse the Division for the Expenditures from the proceeds of one or more grants to be made by the Commonwealth of Virginia (the "Grants") from the proceeds of its tax exempt notes (the Notes"); NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD AS FOLLOWS: Section I. The Board hereby declares the Division's intent to reimburse the Division with the proceeds of the Grants for the Expenditures with respect to the Project made on and after MARCH 9, 1999. The Division reasonably expects on the date hereof that it will reimburse the Expenditures with the proceeds of the Grants. Section 2. Each Expenditure will be of a type properly chargeable to this grant under general federal income tax principles (determined in each case as of the date of the Expenditure). Section 3. The maximum cost of the Project is expected to be $305,000. Section 4. The Division will make a reimbursement allocation, which is a written allocation by the Division that evidences the Division's use of proceeds of the Grants to reimburse an Expenditure, no later than 18 months after the later of the date on which the Expenditure is paid or the Project is placed in service or abandoned, but in no event more than three years after the date on which the Expenditure is paid. The Division recognizes that exceptions are available for certain "preliminary expenditures," costs of issuance, certain de minimis amounts, expenditures by "small issuers" (based on the year of issuance and not the year of expenditure) and expenditures for construction projects of at least 5 years. ~~ ~' Section 5. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. PASSED AND ADOPTED this fifth day of March, 1999. Adopted on motion of Michael W. Stovall, seconded by Jerry L. Canada and on the following recorded vote: AYES: William A. Irvin, Michael W. Stovall, Jerry L. Canada and Marion G. Roark. NAYS: None ABSENT: Thomas A. Leggette TESTE: ............................. .Clerk c: Mrs. Penny Hodge Mrs. Diane Hyatt File AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 9, 1999 RESOLUTION 030999-6 APPROVING A VOLUNTARY SETTLEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE AND THE TOWN OF VINTON, REQUESTING A REVIEW OF THE AGREEMENT BY THE COMMISSION ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 15.2-3400 OF THE 1950 CODE OF VIRGINIA, AS AMENDED, AND STATING THE INTENTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO READOPT THE AGREEMENT AND TO PETITION THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ROANOKE COUNTY, SUBSEQUENT TO THE COMMISSION'S REVIEW, TO APPROVE THE SETTLEMENT AND TO GIVE IT FULL FORCE AND EFFECT WHEREAS, the Town of Vinton and the County of Roanoke have entered into negotiations to seek a voluntary settlement of annexation issues; and WHEREAS, the Town and County are now prepared to enter into a voluntary settlement which provides for the limited waiver by the Town of certain annexation rights, for the payment by the County of certain sales and use taxes and other funds to the Town, for the sharing of certain local tax revenues generated by new development in that portion of the County generally known as "East Roanoke County," for certain cooperative activities between the Town and the County, and for other maters; and WHEREAS, Chapter 34 of Title 15.2 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, requires that such a voluntary settlement be reviewed by the Commission on Local Government. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County hereby approves the Gain Sharing Agreement between the Town of Vinton and the County of Roanoke, a copy of 1 which is attached, and hereby authorizes and directs its Chairman to execute the Agreement on behalf of the County; and 2. That the Board of Supervisors hereby requests that the Commission on Local Government review the Agreement pursuant to Section 15.2-3400 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and 3. That the County Administrator is hereby directed to refer the Agreement, together with all necessary data and materials, to the Commission and to take all other actions as may be required to accomplish the Commission's review of the Agreement; and 4. That the Board of Supervisors hereby designates Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney, as its contact person for communications with the Commission regarding the review of the Agreement; and 5. That it is in the intention of the Board of Supervisors, subsequent to the Commission's review, to readopt the Agreement and thereafter to petition the Circuit Court of Roanoke County to affirm and validate the Agreement and to give it full force and effect. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution and submit agreement to Commission on Local Government, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Harrison A COPY TESTE: ~- Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors 2 cc: File Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Clay Goodman, Manager, Town of Vinton Carter Glass, IV Esq., Mays & Valentine, P. O. Box 1122, Richmond, VA 23218- 1122 Item No. ~ --~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY, VII2GINIA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ROANOKE COUNTY, VIItGINIA MEETING DATE: March 9, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: Consideration of a Gain Sharing Agreement with the Town of Vinton and Submittal of the Agreement to the Commission on Local Government COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S SECTION: This Agreement is the culmination of much work by the County and the Town and represents a method to encourage growth in East County while stimulating the Town's economy through the gain sharing payments. Roanoke County already provides a variety of payments and services to Vinton in recognition that Town citizens are also County citizens: o Payments for solid waste collection and disposal fees -the County currently pays $110,000 for solid waste collection and disposal in the Town of Vinton. o Fire-emergency medical care services -the County currently pays fifty percent of the cost of fire and emergency medical care services for the Town. In FY 1997/98, that was $119,928. o Increased sales and use tax revenues -under state law, Counties reimburse Towns for sales tax based on the population ratio of the County to the Town. Roanoke County currently reimburses Vinton at a higher percentage than that required by the state. Currently, that amount is in excess of $125,000. The Gain Sharing Agreement will continue these payments on behalf of the County citizens residing in the town limits, along with providing libraries, parks and recreation, social services and schools. This Agreement, however, also provides for sharing revenue from new growth outside the town limits, after deducting the cost of providing services to the area, in return for the Town waiving its right to annex. It would be nice if this type of Agreement were not necessary, but we cannot predict what future Boards and Town Councils might do with respect to annexation in East County. Virginia law does give us the ability to create this type of Agreement, a product of negotiation rather than confrontation. Annexation is a hurtful and expensive process, and avoiding it through gain sharing is in the best interest of the County and the Town. Through this Agreement, the Town will have the opportunity 1 "..~~ to share in growth, without the up-front cost of providing services which annexation would require. As you can see from the attached charts, while the County will share its revenue, our loss will be less than if the Town expanded its boundaries. It is my sincere hope that with the gain sharing revenue, the Town can focus on maintaining and improving the amenities which it provides to the citizens of East County. The downtown and other shopping areas are vital to our economy, and gain sharing proceeds should be used to revitalize and expand those areas, thereby improving the financial strength of both the Town and the County. This Agreement will provide us with the means to develop the MacDonald Farm as a centerpiece for the entire East County area. With the concept plan already in place, we can together go forward with rezoning and marketing the property in an imaginative and feasible manner. I support this process and believe that everyone involved has been working for the good of the Town and the County combined. Board Member Harry Nickens, County Attorney Paul Mahoney, Finance Director Diane Hyatt and I have been intimately involved with the negotiations, along with Vinton Mayor Charlie Hill ,Town Manager Clay Goodman, and their attorney, Carter Glass. The Agreement has been discussed numerous times in executive session, and the Board asked us to proceed with finalization. The consensus which we have reached is a workable solution to the potential problem of annexation. I recommend that we forward the Agreement to COLG, but that if changes are made by the Commission which are not in the County's best interest, that we exercise the right to review the changes and accept or reject the modifications. COUNTY ATTORNEY'S SECTION: The Town of Vinton and the County of Roanoke have been negotiating an Agreement over the past four years to assist the town in meeting the future service needs of its citizens and to increase and stabilize its revenues, while preserving the County's tax revenue base, protecting its boundaries, and allowing it to meet the demands for public services of all of its citizens. These negotiations have considered a variety of topics and solutions to alleviate the fiscal stress on the Town as well as sure the town that its residents are receiving their fair share of the value of general County services. This Agreement, which has a term of 20 years, sets out the financial support which the County currently provides to the Town, such as sharing of fire and rescue costs, payment for solid waste disposal, and reimbursement for sales tax revenues at a higher ratio than mandated by state law. These arrangements will stay in place under the gain sharing Agreement, and additional revenue sources will now be available to the Town. The two governments will share revenues from taxes on newly constructed property in the East County area. The taxes include real estate, personal property, machinery and tool, BPOL, Motor Vehicle license, Bank Franchise, Food and Beverage, admission and transient occupancy. The revenue will be shared on a 50/50 basis, after the cost of providing services in the area has been deducted. The governments are also agreeing to joint advisory review of certain planning and zoning matters, a waiver of annexation rights, and for the opportunity to share in future economic development projects, such as the MacDonald Farm. The Town is expected to vote on this resolution sometime next week, and the Agreement will then 2 G-5 be submitted to COLG for review and recommendations and then forwarded to Court for approval. The COLG will hold public hearings on the Agreement, which will be advertised and allow for public input on the terms. COLG will then report its findings and recommendations. This report is not binding on the parties, or the court, but is only advisory. Upon receipt of the COLG report, the Town and County must hold an advertised public hearing and adopt by ordinance the Agreement, before submitting it to the special court for its approval. Even if COLG recommends modifications to this Agreement, the Town and County have agreed to submit this Agreement in its present form to the Court for approval. The Court is limited in its authority to either affirm or deny the Agreement, and it cannot amend or modify the Agreement without the express approval of both localities. The entire process is expected to take between six and twelve months. FISCAL IlVIPACT: The fiscal impact of this Agreement is attached as Exhibit A, "Estimate of Gain Sharing Payments to the Town of Vinton." The first annual payment after the Agreement becomes final will be $31,000. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This Resolution and Agreement is submitted to the Board of Supervisors for its review and action, contingent on Vinton Town Council approving an identical document. Staffrecommends however, that the Agreement be amended so that the implementation date be changed to whenever all necessary approvals have been obtained. Additionally, staff recommends that the signing be contingent on reaching a separate Agreement sharing the implementation and annual costs of operating the program. ~. ` ' l Paul Mahoney County Attorney ACTION Approved Denied Received Referred to ()Motion by: O Respectfully submitted, ~iN,.,/ Elmer Hodge County Administrator No Yes Abs Harrison _ _ Johnson _ _ McNamara _ _ _ Minnix _ Nickens ~=5 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 9, 1999 RESOLUTION APPROVING A VOLUNTARY SETTLEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE AND THE TOWN OF VINTON, REQUESTING A REVIEW OF THE AGREEMENT BY THE COMMISSION ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 15.2-3400 OF THE 1950 CODE OF VIRGINIA, AS AMENDED, AND STATING THE INTENTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO READOPT THE AGREEMENT AND TO PETITION THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ROANOKE COUNTY, SUBSEQUENT TO THE COMMISSION'S REVIEW, TO APPROVE THE SETTLEMENT AND TO GIVE IT FULL FORCE AND EFFECT WHEREAS, the Town of Vinton and the County of Roanoke have entered into negotiations to seek a voluntary settlement of annexation issues; and WHEREAS, the Town and County are now prepared to enter into a voluntary settlement which provides for the limited waiver by the Town of certain annexation rights, for the payment by the County of certain sales and use taxes and other funds to the Town, for the sharing of certain local tax revenues generated by new development in that portion of the County generally known as "East Roanoke County," for certain cooperative activities between the Town and the County, and for other maters; and WHEREAS, Chapter 34 of Title 15.2 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, requires that such a voluntary settlement be reviewed by the Commission on Local Government. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: That the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County hereby approves the Gain Sharing Agreement between the Town of Vinton and the County of Roanoke, a copy of which is attached, and hereby, authorizes and directs its Chairman to execute the Agreement on behalf of the County; and 2. That the Board of Supervisors hereby requests that the Commission on Local Government review the Agreement pursuant to Section 15.2-3400 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and 3. That the County Administrator is hereby directed to refer the Agreement, together with all G:WTTORNEY\PMM\CITYTOWN\V INTONGS.RES ~- necessary data and materials, to the Commission and to take all other actions as may be required to accomplish the Commission's review of the Agreement; and 4. That the Board of Supervisors hereby designates Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney, as its contact person for communications with the Commission regarding the review of the Agreement; and That it is in the intention of the Board of Supervisors, subsequent to the Commission's review, to readopt the Agreement and thereafter to petition the Circuit Court of Roanoke County to affirm and validate the Agreement and to give it full force and effect. G: WTTORNEY\PMM\CITYTOWN\VINTONGS.RES L ~C G w O c O H d t ++ O w O A la a vs C .` ~a s ti C IQ O W O O O O N tO t~ ~t op N~ t~ M O N ~l I~ 'd' ~A M t~ ++ C OOOOd'd'~~Ar-MO~cOf~OtC>MtAM00M CO ~ O OOOOd'cCd'ONMMd~CO~C00f~r-NM O ~'' ~~r=~ri~~riv ocfl uir=rio~vo MCOMOQ~t ~ ~ 0 Cfl ~; MC4 MMMM~I~OMCD ~M ~~~r-NNMMt'7ct~t~~CO O a i°- "' ~ cfl0~~. ti d O C ~ N~ N CO E d M~'M~ N ~ C E CO d' N ~ ~~ o a a~ ,,,~ ~~ cflO~l'3MN~I~~f'DON~I~MON~1`~-~t~M tp t aQM ~ ' ' ' O N q c~ ~~~MC~cDf -O (Dl~~td M d ' y~ I~NtnP-'d'cCd'ONMMV CO~WOt~~NM d CiA NMt`OTMCOt,nMefC~OcD~«7t~M0<-'~O h- M~- N~I~OMcO0MCD0~7'o0M00Ma0~ N ~ t MO~tD~OM00t(7V0'~t~~-ttOM000tn r C I~(AM~1'04~~'-OMt~t`-M~1'000~~COt~(D ~t _ .~ C Vd^~--u'30~NQOd;tOi~~MNI~OtA(V~(~ CO ~C9'~ uico~ciai~pr~or~aONONaSo~cico•=Naoo v O la 1-'p~ (t~N~~O~~-C4NQ~CflM001~(D(OCPCOaO `~`-' ~~NNMM~tt(')(p(OP-Of300r-N ~A GO N Z ~- r ~- ~ -..-..-..-..-..-..-..-. ~ .-. ~ ~..-. ~...-~ .-...~. r...-..~ OOOOe--~cL)t1~V MNr-N~C?MOONOtf?NCQ ~-. o O(pO~Otf)Md'OC~tn0000r'~Nc~r- f~ ~ Nt~M.-~-et0(Dtnt`NO)OM~00~1~1~ 00 ~ m ~ Gf?Ot(~OtnOtn~I~MOCOMr-COtptt~MNN 0~ V l-~ O r- r- N N M M ~t ~ to CO c0 f~ M 00 0 O ~- N M - - - - N xN rr~ ~e r ~~~~r ~~~~r NNNN .~ .~ ........ `..~ ~......_.._..._....... ~.. ~ ~ .......r...~ ~.. N W ~ ..~ OD CO CD O r- O M N cD tp Cp 00 M 1~ C~ to CQ el ~ M 0 d'~(?O~OOQd"-n~N~~(~ONOOcD~~ GO O ~M(ONOMON~ ~t01~1~-NNOCDd~~A ' O Ntt?d?tf}NOO~~OQ~[?d ~l~M~~~C?NN OQ 'p ~-NM-n1~00Mt[~t~OM(pOMI~~~OtA 0 C ..........~...~-'~e-r~NNNNMM~t~t~~ ~ `~' W a ooooo00000000000000 0 ~ 000000oooooaooooo000 0 aooaooooo00000oooooa o ~ v r-NM ~~.c~cO1~OD00~N M~ t[)Cph-0000 O ~ rr,~-~-r.-rrrrN r- ~ N dpi't[3~tnMt~~CDf`MC~'7~d'i~-a-1~Mi~ CO R Mtn-Ise-tf)001~-NONCOI~NMM~~cfl(4~ O I~tntndOMN(D~ON~(0~0Na00D~tcG1~OD M O d M00'd'~00~~1'~rfjMMtAOCDtt~f~-~OC3~U ' M e r"N~(OQOON~tcDONtnO~N-l )OMO~NI~ N G ~- ~- ~- ~ r- N N N M c~ M ~t d' ~ ~ C~ LL Q. ~ aOtnNU?dONtf?NoO~Ad'll~d?tpetOQWOOOQ e- M'V'(flM~-I~tDF`I~h~COtf)C~Md~000t~Ob M ' ,Q; ~O~~a01~~r-O~f~l~e-~OONNOOM fit ~ N o~~N~ODr-~~~O~00~~~N~NtA((pp OD ~ cY3f~-N(a~1~N00tC3r-OCO~MNNNehttc~ et' W ~~-NNMM~ttAi.!)tGt~-0000r-NM~ to ~- N M tt ~ (O t` aD d~ O e- CV M ~!'el? (p 1~. 0O 0 0 r r r e- ~- r- ~- ~- r .- N L ~ O n 3 0 U Y O C 0 O C ~ ~ O C O G J Q O ~ a Y R C s~ O C 2 C U H ~,„~p ~• ~~~ mdrU~ W 3 N .i" ~ II ~ LL ,~ pWWW~ a > x ~ F Yi 111 ~ ~ u v K v LL 3 C d a O N 6 J G O E U 01 C LL Ol h t t1 C LLy N C e v J r K O1 0 It! f" C ~ .~ ~ J X ~_ F w O va Z v Q R d } ~s~p~~g~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ O N M Inn n~ ~ M 1 nA n O N 1 MA ~ O M~~ N N M M M M M M Q Q Q Q N In to ~f 1 CO CO CB t0 n ~~~~~o~~~~o~o~o~~~~~ 00000000000000000000 pQpQ B8eooe~{~l'70D fD O~((((pppp p~Q~y~y~~7(^p ~ODnNN~^~pp 000 NQIQ 00D c- ~OO fM'I ONO ('~ Q) InNOOD tD O NQtO OpON V' nOl V tD OI '~tnONln ~o~~N~~~~~~~~~~~°~~o 55~~ 00 (D 1n lA In n O N ~ n Q N M IA CA I?'iilnlVl°~ivnilonm~c~~nti~~aNO~~rnrna~ g~8~~~~~~~~~~~g~~~~~ ~M~M~MMMMMM~~MMMMMMM ~~~g~~~8~~8~8~~~~8~~ -------------------- M M f~' I t `~') l~7 C~7 M f 07 M M E (~ f ~7 f 07 M C O~ I C ~~ l~ M l 000 NIOOIfOIrnl0~/0000 (O In~ V In (NO 000~~ nO NInnONIn aDOM NNOD~ r N N N N M M M M Q Q Q R N In N 00 OD (D n t ND ~ On0 O M l00 ~ f 0~ ! OOD M O O 1 N N~~ n n m ~i ~ neoO)~NMQ (DnOONQNnO~MtnO N N N M M M M M M M V V a R R Q to In !A In NnnM rn m m o °'O mn fMO~~M MM~ ~OC~I ODO V' 1A~ 00.-NM Qlmm~aDOONNf vOOnGOON N N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M M M R R O Q MOD M O O n O 0 l n O I n O O N n 0 0 N N N N N N N N l~ fN ~ l h ~ M Y Q 0V GOON V OMON~~~O~ONI~OOQOM NM IQiuNil~il~iv°Di~~o~°~~n~~~a~~irnrno~ o0opor~aomfnpMm~npmncnaou~m~vplmnm<o ~8p (O Q ~ MOM OO~ppO oOnpOp ~ O N Innn ~ N ~ N CO In M ~ 1A Inn 10n (O f0 ~ f0 fD ~ n n ^ n OND ~ OnD 00O ~ ~ ~ 8 S N n Q M 000 ~ N In O O O W~ O N p np Mp t0 NOD 11~nNW ntn M_N ~^M10 to Ilf fQ tQnao a0 alO CV (7QQtl7 t\m Q1O c-~ ~-~ ~~~ r NNNNNNNNNNMM IN Onp ~ O tN0 N 00 !Mn N to t0 M N Ol ~ to Q ~ ~_ 00000)OO~~NMMQNOD fOnOD O/Q N r- ~ ~ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C~~ f+ M 0 7 O QO OOppp R O (0 IM I~ ~~~pp M OOOpp ~ p~p ~I~pnp r- O N 1~ N W 800~~ NNMlhRR1~ OO OpnOOO an0~0~ O OD N n 00 ~ g O (O O! t0 n ^ O (7 ~ V' ~ ~ OnD N OnO_ OMD_ r n _ _ ~p _ _ _ _ _ _ _O p_ _ _ _ _ om~rnmO~NMQInfOr~~O~M~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r- N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M ~ N M V In OD n aD O O ~ N M Q In m n aD 0 0 O Of S N M n O V IN E' _'"~~. DRAFT: 1/5/99 GAIN SHARING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TOWN OF VINTON AND THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS Page 1.01 Town ....................................................................................................... 5 1.02 Code ........................................................................................................ 5 1.03 Commission ........................................................... .................. ................ 5 1.04 County ..................................................................................................... 5 1.05 Court ... .................................................................. .................................. 5 1.06 Section ..................................................................................................... 5 1.07 Consumer Price Index .............................................................................. 5 1.08 East Roanoke County .............................................................................. 6 1.09 Newly Constructed Property .................................................................... 6 1.10 Local Sales and Use tax ........................................................................... 7 1.11 Real Estate tax ......................................................................................... 7 1.12 Personal Property tax ............................................................................... 7 1.13 Business, Professional, and Occupational License (BPOL) tax ................ 7 1.14 Machinery and Tool tax ........................................................................... 7 1.15 Motor Vehicle License tax ....................................................................... 8 1.16 Bank Franchise tax .................................................................................. 8 1.17 Food and Beverage tax ............................................................................ 8 1.18 Admission tax ......................................................................................... 8 1.19 Transient Occupancy tax ............................................................ ............. 8 1.20 Consumer Utility tax ............................................................................... 8 1.21 Cable Television tax ................................................................................ 9 1.22 Preemptive taxes ...................................................................................... 9 ECTION 2. EXISTING PAYMENTS BY THE COUNTY 2.01 General .................................................................................................... 9 2.02 Local Sales and Use Tax Revenues .......................................................... 9 2.03 Condition of Payments of Local Sales and Use Tax Revenues ................. 10 2.04 Solid Waste Collection and Disposal ....................................................... 11 2.05 Condition of Payments for Solid Waste Collection and Disposal ............. 12 2.06 Reductions in Payments for Solid Waste Collection and Disposal ........... 12 2.07 Fire/Emergency Medical Care Services .................................................... 13 2.08 Conditions of Payments of Fire/Emergency Medical Services .................. 14 ~-~ Draft -- 1/5/99 SECTION 3. GAIN SHARING 3.01 Purpose of Gain Sharing .......................................................................... 15 3.02 Calculation of Gain Sharing Payments ..................................................... 15 3.03 Tax Revenues Included In Gain Sharing Payments .................................. .16 3.04 Tax Revenues Included In Gain Sharing Payments -- Calculation of Personal Property Tax Revenue ............................................................... 16 3.05 Tax Revenues Included In Gain Sharing Payments -- Calculation of Motor Vehicle License Tax Revenue ....................................................... 17 3.06 Tax Revenues Included In Gain Sharing Payments -Local Tax Replaced by State Funding ...................................................................... 17 3.07 Tax Revenues Subject To Gain Sharing Payments -Local Tax Replaced By Another Local Tax .............................................................. 18 3.08 Business Conducted At Multiple Locations ............................................. 19 3.09 Preemptive Taxes .................................................................................... 20 3.10 Reduction for Excess Sales Tax Payments ............................................... 21 3.11 Service Cost Reductions .......................................................................... 22 3.12 Limitations on Service Cost Reductions ................................................... 23 3.13 Conditions of Service Cost Reductions .................................................... 24 3.14 ................... Schedule of Gain Sharing Payments ...................................... 2 3.15 Minimum Payment .................................................................................. 25 3.16 Appropriation of Sufficient Funds ............................................................ 25 3.17 Recordkeeping Requirements ................................................................... 26 SECTION 4. JOINT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 4.01 Public Improvements for Commercial or Industrial Development ............ 27 4.02 Other Public Improvement Funding ......................................................... 27 4.03 MacDonald Farm Economic Development Project ................................... 27 SECTION 5. PLANNING AND ZONING 5.01 Promotion of Residential and Commercial Development ......................... 30 5.02 Advisory Review of County Planning Actions ......................................... 30 5.03 Advisory Review of Town Planning Actions ........................................... 31 SECTION 6. ANNEXATION 6.01 Moratorium on Town or Citizen-Initiated Annexation Suits......... ............. 31 6.02 Mutually Approved Changes of Boundaries ............................................. 31 ......................... 6.03 Annexation Where Funding Not Appropriated ................ 2 LC Draft -- 1/5/99 SECTION 7. REMEDIES AND ENFORCEMENT 7.01 Remedies for Town Breaches .................................................................. 32 7.02 Resolution of Disputes ............................................................................. 33 SECTION 8. CONSOLIDATION 8.01 Consolidation, Incorporation of East Roanoke County ............................ 33 SECTION 9. COMMISSION AND COURT APPROVAL 9.01 Commission Approval ............................................................................. 34 9.02 Submission to Court ................................................................................ 34 9.03 Termination if Agreement Modified ...................... ........... 34 ....................... SECTION 10. TERM OF AGREEMENT 10.01 Term of the Agreement ............................. ............. 34 .................................. SECTION 11. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 11.01 Binding on Future Governing Bodies ....................................................... 35 11.02 Amendments to Agreement ...................................................................... 35 11.03 Collection of Personal Property Taxes ..................................................... 35 3 Draft -- 1/5/99 C ;~ This AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of 1998, and executed in quintuplicate originals (each executed copy constituting an original) by and between the TOWN OF VINTON, VIRGINIA, a municipal corporation of the Commonwealth of Virginia (the "Town"), and the COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia (the "County"). WHEREAS, the Town and the County have reached this Agreement, pursuant to Title 15.2, Chapter 34 of the Virginia Code, providing for the sharing of certain revenue, for the sharing of costs of certain public services, for joint advisory review of certain planning and zoning matters, for the waiver of certain annexation rights, and for other matters; and, WHEREAS, the ability of the Town to meet the future service needs of its citizens and to increase and to stabilize its revenues is of critical importance; and, WHEREAS, the ability of the County to preserve its tax revenue base, to protect its jurisdictional boundaries, and to meet the demands for public services is also of critical importance; and, WHEREAS, the Town and the County have reached this Agreement to address the mutual concerns of each jurisdiction, to promote strong and viable units of local government, and to encourage economic growth and development. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, the parties agree with each other as follows: 4 Draft -- 1/5/99 ~''°".~ SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS The parties hereto agree that the following words, terms and abbreviations as used in this Agreement shall have the following defined meanings, unless the context clearly provides otherwise: 1.01 Town: "Town" shall mean the Town of Vinton, Virginia. 1.02 Code: Code" shall mean the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended. 1.03 Commission: "Commission" shall mean the Commission on Local Government. 1.04 Coun "County" shall' mean the County of Roanoke, Virginia. 1.05 Court: "Court" shall mean the Special Three-Judge Court appointed by the Supreme Court of Virginia pursuant to Title 15.2, Chapter 30, § 15.2-3000 of the Code. 1.06 Section; Subsection: "Section" or "subsection" refers to parts of this Agreement unless the context indicates that the reference is to parts of the Code. 1.07 Consumer Price Index ("CPI"): "Consumer Price Index" shall mean the index of consumer prices as determined by the Bureau of Labor Statistics and released in the Blue Chip Economic Indicators Report. The base line CPI shall be the first quarter 1998, which was 162.0. Annual increases shall be computed based upon the first quarter of subsequent years. 1.08 East Roanoke County: "East Roanoke County" shall mean that area of Roanoke County located south of Stewart Knob, north of the Roanoke River;, west of the 5 .~ Draft -- 1/5/99 Roanoke/Bedford County line, and east of eastern corporate line of the Town of Vinton. A map showing the boundaries of this area is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 1.09 Newly Constructed Property: "Newly Constructed Property" shall mean any real estate tax parcels in East Roanoke County on which any buildings, structures or other improvements of any kind are constructed or made after January 1, 1999, where such construction requires the issuance of a building permit and a certificate of occupancy or other permit authorizing the owner to use such building, structure or improvement. For purposes of this Agreement, any such building, structure or other improvement shall be deemed to have been constructed or made as of the date of issue of the certificate of occupancy or other permit authorizing the owner to use such building, structure or improvement. "Newly Constructed Property" shall not include, however, any tax parcel on which repairs, reconstruction or additions to existing structures or buildings are made, unless the cost (as listed on the building permit) of the repair, reconstruction or addition exceeds twenty-five percent (25%) of the assessed value of the existing structure or building at the time the building permit is issued. If the building permit does not contain the estimated cost of the repair, reconstruction or addition, then the cost for this purpose shall be based on the difference between the assessed value of the existing structure or building at the time the building permit is issued and the assessed value of the structure or building after the repairs, reconstruction, or additions have been made and are reflected in the assessments for the structure or building. Once a particular tax parcel is designated as Newly Constructed Property for purposes of this Agreement, that tax parcel 6 S Draft -- 1/5/99 shall be considered Newly Constructed Property for the remainder of the term of this Agreement. 1.10 Local Sales and Use tax: "Local Sales and Use tax" shall mean that tax provided for in Chapter 6 of Title 58.1 (§ 58.1-605 et sec .), or any successor provision, of the Code of Virginia. 1.11 Real Estate tax: "Real Estate tax" shall mean that tax provided for in Chapter 32 of Title 58.1 (§ 58.1-3200 et sec .), or any successor provision, of the Code of Virginia. 1.12 Personal Property tax: "Personal Property tax" shall mean that tax provided for in Art. 1, Chapter 35 of Title 58.1 (§ 58.1-3500 et seg.), or any successor provision, of the Code of Virginia. 1.13 Business, Professional, and Occupational License ("BPOL") tax: "Business, Professional, and Occupational License tax" shall mean that tax provided for in Chapter 37 of Title 58.1 (§ 58.1-3700 et seg.), or any successor provision, of the Code of Virginia. 1.14 Machinery and Tool tax: "Machinery and Tool tax" shall mean that tax provided for in Art. 2, Chapter 35 of Title 58.1 (§ 58.1-3507 et sec .), or any successor provision, of the Code of Virginia. 1.15 Motor Vehicle License tax: "Motor Vehicle License tax" shall mean that tax provided for in Art. 11, Chapter 6 of Title 46.2 (§ 46.2-752 et seg.), or any successor provision, of the Code of Virginia. 7 Draft -- 1/5/99 ~-~ l . l6 Bank Franchise tax: "Bank Franchise tax" shall mean that tax provided for in Chapter 12 of Title 58.1 (§ 57.1-1200 et seq.), or any successor provision, of the Code of Virginia. 1.17 Food and Beverage tax: "Food and Beverage tax" shall mean that tax provided for in Art. 7.1, Chapter 38 of Title 58.1 (§ 58.1-3833 et sec .), or any successor provision of the Code of Virginia. 1.18 Admission tax: "Admission tax" shall mean that tax provided for in Art. 5, Chapter 38 of Title 58.1 (§ 58.1-3817 et sec .), or any successor provision, of the Code of Virginia. 1.19 Transient Occupancy tax: "Transient Occupancy tax" shall mean that tax provided for in Art. 6, Chapter 38 of Title 58.1 (§ 58.1-3819 et sec .), or any successor provision, of the Code of Virginia. 1.20 Consumer Utility tax: "Consumer Utility tax" shall mean those taxes provided for in Art. 4, Chapter 38 of Title 58.1 (§ 58.1-3812 et sec .), or any successor provision, of the Code of Virginia, including taxes on consumers of telecommunication services, of enhanced 911 emergency telephone services, and of utility services provided by any water or heat, light and power company. 1.21 Cable Television tax: "Cable Television tax" shall mean that tax imposed on providers of cable television service as provided in Chapter 37 of Title 58.1 (§ 58.1- 3703), or any successor provision, of the Code of Virginia. 8 Draft -- 1/5/99 1.22 Preemptive Taxes: "Preemptive Taxes" shall include the Town's Cable Television tax, Consumer Utility tax, Food and Beverage tax, Admissions tax, Motor Vehicle License tax, and Transient Occupancy tax, as they are defined above, or any other tax imposed by the Town which would bar the County from assessing and collecting that same tax within the limits of the Town. SECTION 2. EXISTING PAYMENTS BY THE COUNTY 2.01 General: The County currently allocates a portion of its Local Sales and Use tax revenues to the Town and makes certain payments to the Town for solid waste collection and disposal services and for fire/emergency medical care services. The County agrees to continue making those payments to the Town for the second half of the 1998-99 fiscal year and thereafter for each fiscal year beginning July 1, 1999 and ending June 30, 2018, and for the first half of the 2018-19 fiscal year ending December 31, 2018, in accordance with the conditions set forth in this Section. The County's obligation to make such payments shall be subject to the annual appropriation of sufficient funds by the County Board of Supervisors. 2.02 Local Sales and Use Tax Revenues: Pursuant to Chapter 191 of the 1966 Acts of Assembly, the County is required to pay to the Town a percentage of revenues generated from all Local Sales and Use taxes collected within the entire County, based on the ratio of the total population of the Town to the total population of the entire County. In calculating the percentage of Local Sales and Use taxes to be paid to the Town, the 9 Draft -- 1/5/99 County agrees that, for the second half of the 1998-99 fiscal year and thereafter for each ~~~ fiscal year beginning July 1, 1999 and ending June 30, 2018, and for the first half of the 2018-19 fiscal year ending December 31, 2018, it shall use 11.77% as the ratio of the Town's total population to the total population of the entire County regardless of the actual Town to County population ratio in any particular year. The County further agrees to make such payments to the Town on a monthly basis. 2.03 Conditions of Payments of Local Sales and Use Tax Revenues: If the Virginia General Assembly, after the effective date of this Agreement, amends Virginia Code Section 58.1-605(B), or any successor provision, to decrease the current one percent (1%) rate for Local Sales and Use taxes which a county may levy to provide revenue for general governmental purposes, then the Town's share of such tax revenues would decrease along with the County's share. On the other hand, if the rate for Local Sales and Use taxes is increased, then the Town's share of the additional revenue generated by that portion of the sales tax exceeding the current one percent (1%) rate shall be calculated on the basis of the ratio of the total population of the Town to the total population of the entire County, as provided in Chapter 191 of the 1966 Acts of Assembly; however, the parties agree that the Town's share of such additional revenue shall never be less than ten percent (10%). If the General Assembly increases the Local Sales and Use tax rate, but eliminates or limits the authority of the County to impose any of the local taxes identified in Section 3.03 of the Agreement, the Town's percentage share of the revenue generated by that 10 Draft -- 1/5/99 portion of the Local Sales and Use tax rate exceeding one percent (1%) will be reduced. Under those circumstances, the Town would be entitled to shaze in the additional revenue only to the extent the revenue from the increased sales tax rate was not offset by the revenues lost by the County as a result of the General Assembly action to eliminate or limit the County's authority to impose any such local taxes, as determined during the first full fiscal year in which such changes in taxes are effective. Once the applicable portion of additional sales tax revenue has been calculated (expressed as a ratio of the additional sales tax revenue not offset by the revenue lost from the other local tax to the total additional revenue generated by that portion of the higher sales tax rate exceeding 1%), it shall be applied to all allocations of Local Sales and Use tax revenues generated by that portion of the Local Sales and Use tax rate exceeding one percent (1%) during the remainder of the term of this Agreement. There is attached hereto and incorporated herein Exhibit A entitled "Example of Change in Sales Tax Rate," which illustrates the calculations described in this Section of the Agreement. 2.04 Solid Waste Collection and Disposal: For the second half of the 1998-99 fiscal year and thereafter for each fiscal year beginning July 1, 1999 and ending June 30, 2018, and for the first half of the 2018-19 fiscal year ending December 31, 2018, the County shall pay the Town a sum of $110,000 for solid waste collection and disposal services provided by the Town to Town residents. The County agrees to pay $55,000 to the Town by October 1 of each fiscal year and the remaining $55,000 by April 1 of each ~~ fiscal year. For the second half of the 1998-99 fiscal year, the County's payment shall Draft -- 1/5/99 ~~ be one-half of $110,000, or $55,000, which shall be due on April 1, 1999. For the first half of the 2018-19 fiscal year, the County's payment shall also be one-half of $110,000, or $55,000, which shall be due on October 1, 2018. 2.05 Conditions of Payments for Solid Waste Collection and Disposal: The County's promise to make the payments provided for in Section 2.04 is conditioned upon (i) the Town continuing to provide solid waste collection and disposal services, either directly with Town personnel or by contract with other service providers such as the regional solid waste authority and (ii) the County continuing to use any general tax revenues to provide solid waste collection and disposal services within the unincorporated portions of the County. Thus, the County will have no obligation to make such payments if, for example, (i) the County's solid waste collection services are funded entirely by a fee assessed against the users of the County service and no general tax revenues in any amount are used to fund that service or (ii) the regional solid waste authority assumes all responsibility for collection of solid waste in the unincorporated portions of the County and the authority charges all users a fee to cover the entire cost of providing that service. 2.06 Reductions in Payments for Solid Waste Collection and Disposal: The County's payments to the Town for solid waste collection and disposal services shall be reduced proportionally, if (i) the Town changes its method of providing solid waste collection or disposal services and (ii) such changes result in a reduction of the Town's total operating and capital costs of providing such services compared to its operating and 12 Draft -- 1/5/99 capital costs during the 1997-98 fiscal year, which totaled $312,768. For example, if the Town's total costs for solid waste collection and disposal services are reduced in the 2000-01 fiscal yeaz to $200,000 (a 20% reduction compared to the total costs of $250,000 in fiscal year 1997-98), because of a new automated method of collecting refuse, then the County's payment would be reduced by twenty percent (20%), from $110,000 to $88,000. 2.07 Fire/Emer ency Medical Care Services: For the second half of the 1998-99 fiscal year and thereafter for each fiscal yeaz beginning July 1, 1999 and ending June 30, 2018, and for the first half of the 2018-19 fiscal year ending December 31, 2018, the County shall pay the Town a sum equal to one-half of the costs of the annual salaries and fringe benefits of the Town's paid firefighters and emergency medical care personnel in return for the fire and emergency medical services provided by the Town within the unincorporated part of the County depicted on the map attached as Exhibit B. For the second half of the 1998-99 fiscal year and the first half of the 2018-19 fiscal yeaz, the County's payment shall be based on one-half of the salary and fringe benefit costs for the six-month period during those fiscal years falling within the term of this Agreement. The County's shaze of the salaries and fringe benefits of the Town's fire and emergency medical caze personnel shall not increase, from year to year, by more than twice the rate of increase of the Consumer Price Index for the preceding calendaz year, or ten percent (10%), whichever is less. For example, if the Town's salary and benefit costs increase by eight percent (8%) over the preceding fiscal year and if the Consumer Price Index 13 Draft -- 1/5/99 -,~ increased by only three percent (3%), then the County shall not be obligated to pay any portion of the increased costs exceeding six percent (6%). The County agrees to make this payment to the Town as billed on a quarterly basis. 2.08 Conditions of Payments of Fire/Emergency Medical Services: The County's promise to make the payments provided for in Section 2.07 is conditioned upon (i) the Town continuing to provide fire and emergency medical services with Town personnel and (ii) the County continuing to use any general tax revenues to provide fire and emergency medical services within the unincorporated portions of the County. Thus, the County will have no obligation to make such payments if, for example, its fire and emergency medical services are funded entirely by a fee assessed against the users of the County service and no general tax revenues are used to fund that service. If the Town increases the number of authorized positions for paid fire or emergency medical care personnel beyond the number that presently exists, the County shall not be obligated to pay any portion of the salary or fringe benefits for such additional Town employees if such additional personnel would result in an increase in the total costs of salaries and fringe benefits for fire protection services and emergency medical care services compared to the funding for such services in the preceding fiscal year, unless such an additional position has been approved by the County. Thus, for example, if the Town hired an additional emergency medical care employee, but the total salary and fringe benefit costs for that service did not increase above the total costs for the preceding year because 14 Draft -- 1/5/99 ~'- -~' certain existing personnel were used only on a part-time basis, such additional positions would not require County approval. SECTION 3. GAIN SHARING 3.01 Purpose of Gain Sharing: The purpose of this Section is to describe the terms upon which the County agrees to share with the Town a portion of certain local tax revenues generated by new development that occurs within East Roanoke County during the period beginning January 1, 1999 and ending December 31, 2018. 3.02 Calculation of Gain Sharing Payments: In accordance with the payment schedule set forth in Section 3.14, the County agrees to pay to the Town fifty percent (50%) of certain local tax revenues collected by the County from Newly Constructed Property in East Roanoke County during the period beginning January 1, 1999 and ending December 31, 2018, except (i) as otherwise adjusted in Sections 3.09, 3.10, and 4.03(d), and except (ii) as reduced by an amount equal to fifty percent (50%) of the County's costs to provide certain services to Newly Constructed Property in East Roanoke County, as described in Sections 3.11 and 3.12. Such payments of local tax revenues, as adjusted or reduced, shall be referred to as the "Gain Sharing Payments." There is attached hereto and incorporated herein an Exhibit C entitled "Example of Gain Sharing Payments to the Town of Vinton," which illustrates the calculations described in this Section of the Agreement. 15 Draft -- 1/5/99 ~--~' 3.03 Tax Revenues Included In Gain Sharing Payments: The County's obligation to make Gain Sharing Payments shall apply to the following local taxes which it collects from the property assessments of Newly Constructed Property, and from transactions, privileges, and activities directly associated with, or conducted on, Newly Constructed Property: Real Estate tax; Personal Property tax; Machinery and Tool tax; BPOL tax; Motor Vehicle License tax; Bank Franchise tax; Food and Beverage tax; Admission tax; and Transient Occupancy tax. Other local taxes currently imposed by the County (for example, the Local Sales and Use Tax, Consumer Utility tax, Utility License tax, and E911 tax) shall not be part of the Gain Sharing Payments. 3.04 Tax Revenues Included In Gain Sharing Payments -- Calculation of Personal Property Tax Revenue: To simplify the administration of this Agreement, the personal property taxes collected in connection with Newly Constructed Property will be estimated, in part, for purposes of determining the Gain Sharing Payments. For Newly Constructed Properties used for residential purposes, Personal Property taxes will be deemed to be a sum equal to a percentage of the Real Estate tax revenue collected from Newly Constructed Properties. The percentage shall be the ratio of Personal Property taxes collected in the entire County (minus business Personal Property taxes) to Real Property taxes collected in the entire County. Personal Property taxes collected in connection with Newly Constructed Properties used for commercial or industrial purposes will not be estimated; instead, the actual Personal Property taxes collected from 16 Draft -- 1/5/99 ~ !~ such Newly Constructed Properties shall be determined by the County and shall be shared by the Town and the County pursuant to the provisions of Section 3.02. 3.05 Tax Revenues Included In Gain Sharing Payments -- Calculation of Motor Vehicle License Tax Revenue: To simplify the administration of this Agreement, the Motor Vehicle License taxes collected in connection with Newly Constructed Property will be estimated, in part, for purposes of determining the Gain Sharing Payments. For Newly Constructed Properties used for residential purposes, Motor Vehicle License taxes will be deemed to be a sum equal to a percentage of the Personal Property tax revenues collected from Newly Constructed Properties as described in Section 3.04. The percentage shall be the ratio of Motor Vehicle License taxes collected in the entire County to Personal Property taxes collected in the entire County. Motor Vehicle License taxes collected in connection with Newly Constructed Properties used for commercial or industrial purposes will not be estimated; instead, the actual Motor Vehicle License taxes collected from such Newly Constructed Properties shall be determined by the County and shall be shared by the Town and the County pursuant to the provisions of Section 3.02. 3.06 Tax Revenues Included In Gain Sharing Payments -- Local Tax Replaced by State Funding: In the event the General Assembly repeals or limits the authority of the County to collect any of the local taxes designated in Section 3.03, but provides that the State will reimburse the County for the loss of all or any part of such tax revenues, then the County agrees that such revenues received from the State shall be subject to the gain sharing provisions of Section 3.02. For example, the General Assembly has adopted 17 Draft -- 1/5/99 L~`.~ legislation that will limit the authority of localities to collect Personal Property taxes on motor vehicles and will provide for the reimbursement of localities by the State for the tax revenues that they would otherwise collect from such personal property. The reimbursement received by the County from the State for Personal Property taxes that the County would have otherwise collected from the owners of motor vehicles normally garaged, stored or parked at Newly Constructed Property, shall constitute part of the County revenues subject to the gain sharing provisions of Section 3.02. However, the parties further agree that the Town will not share in any categorical revenues (for example, funds for education) which are returned to the County by the State for special governmental purposes and which are not available to the County to use fot general fund expenditures. 3.07 Tax Revenues Included In Gain Sharing Payments -Local Tax Replaced By Another Local Tax: In the event the General Assembly repeals or limits the authority of the County to collect any of the local taxes designated in Section 3.03, but grants the County the authority to impose a new local tax, then revenues collected from part or all of such new tax from Newly Constructed Property, or the owners of Newly Constructed Property, shall constitute part of the County revenues subject to the gain sharing provisions of Section 3.02, as long as the new local tax may be used for general governmental purposes. Under such circumstances, the purpose of this Section is to keep the parties in the same relative position by permitting the Town to share only in that portion of the revenues from the new tax equal to the amount of revenue that would have 18 Draft -- 1/5/99 been generated from the tax repealed or limited by the General Assembly during the first fiscal yeaz during which the new tax becomes effective. The portion of the revenue generated by the new local tax to be shazed by the Town shall equal the ratio of the County's total annual loss of revenue from Newly Constructed Property as a result of the elimination or limitation of such taxes designated in Section 3.03 to the County's total annual gain in revenue from Newly Constructed Property as a result of the imposition of the new local tax, based on the first full fiscal yeaz during which the new tax becomes effective. Once the applicable portion of the revenue generated by the new local tax has been calculated, that ratio shall be applied to the new local tax revenue from Newly Constructed Property during the remainder of the term of this Agreement. If there is a disagreement between the parties as to the correct allocation of the new tax that will be subject to the gain sharing provisions, it shall be resolved by azbitration pursuant to Section 7.02. 3.08 Business Conducted At Multiple Locations -- BPOL Tax: Where a business conducts operations at more than one location in the County and where one of the locations constitutes Newly Constructed Property and the other does not constitute Newly Constructed Property, the parties recognize that the County, under certain circumstances, may not be able to obtain sufficient information to allocate the gross receipts of the business between the two locations. For example, a commercial business may have an existing operation in East Roanoke County, which would not be subject to the gain sharing provisions of Section 3.02. It may construct a new building across the .L` ' .~ 19 Draft -- 1/5/99 .~ street in which it houses an additional group of employees and that building would constitute Newly Constructed Property. In that situation, the business owner may not be able to allocate gross receipts of its business between the two locations or the County might not be able to compel the business owner to make such an allocation. Under those circumstances, the parties agree that the BPOL tax attributable to the Newly Constructed Property shall be that percentage of the total BPOL tax paid by the business equal to the ratio of the square footage of building space at the Newly Constructed Property to the total square footage of building space at both locations of the business. 3.09 Preemptive Taxes: The Town and the County agree that so long as the Town imposes any Preemptive Taxes, the amount of the Gain Sharing Payments made by the County to the Town pursuant to Section 3.02 of this Agreement shall be adjusted in the following manner: (a) If the Town assesses a Preemptive Tax with a rate lower than the County's rate for that same tax, the County, during that fiscal year, shall deduct from the Gain Sharing Payments paid by the County pursuant to Section 3.02, an amount equal to the difference between the actual tax revenue collected by the Town from that Preemptive Tax within its corporate boundaries, based on its existing tax rate, and the tax revenue that the Town would have collected from that Preemptive Tax within its corporate boundaries, based on a rate equal to the County's higher tax rate. The parties agree that the provisions of this subsection shall not become effective until January I, 2002. 20 Draft -- 1/5/99 ~_ (b) If, at any time during the period beginning January 1, 1999 and ending December 31, 2018, the Town repeals a Preemptive Tax and the County then assesses and collects such tax within the corporate limits of the Town, the County agrees to make an annual payment to the Town for an amount equal to the revenues the Town would have collected within its corporate limits from the Preemptive Tax based on its tax rate in effect at the time the Preemptive Tax was repealed. If the Town tax rate for the Preemptive Tax at the time it was repealed was less than the County's tax rate for such tax, then a portion of the County's revenue from such tax collected within the Town's corporate boundaries shall then be included in the total tax revenues to be shared between the Town and the County, as provided for in Section 3.02. The amount to be included in the tax revenues subject to the Gain Sharing Payments shall be equal to the difference between the amount of tax revenue which the County would have collected at the Town's tax rate prior to the repeal of the Preemptive Tax and the amount of tax revenue actually collected by the County at its higher tax rate. 3.10 Reduction for Excess Sales Tax Payments: The Gain Sharing Payments to be made by the County as set forth in Section 3.02 shall be reduced each fiscal year by an amount equal to fifty percent (50%) of the Local Sales and Use tax revenues received by the Town pursuant to Section 2.02 in excess of the amount the County would be required to pay the Town under Chapter 191 of the 1966 Acts of Assembly if the actual Town to County population ratio were used rather than a percentage of 11.77%. For purposes of this section, the parties agree that the actual Town to County population ratio used in 21 Draft -- 1/5/99 m ~ ~ calculation shall never be less than ten ercent 10% . For exam le, if the akmg this P ( ) P actual Town to County population ratio is 10.5%, then the reduction would equal fifty percent (50%) of the difference between the Local Sales and Use tax revenues calculated by using the 10.5% ratio and by using the 11.77% ratio. If the actual ratio was 9.2%, then the reduction would equal fifty percent (50%) of the difference between the Local Sales and Use tax revenues calculated by using the minimum 10% ratio and by using the 11.77% ratio. The actual Town to County population ratio shall be based on the most current decennial census. 3.11 Service Cost Reductions: The amount of the Gain Sharing Payments paid by the County as set forth in Section 3.02 shall be reduced by a sum (the "Service Cost Reductions") equal to fifty percent (50%) of the County's costs to provide law enforcement and traffic control, solid waste collection and disposal, and fire and rescue services to Newly Constructed Property in East Roanoke County. The costs of providing such services shall be calculated as follows: The number of Newly Constructed Properties in East Roanoke County shall be multiplied by the average number of persons per detached household in Roanoke County as determined by the most current decennial census. The product of that calculation shall be multiplied by the County's per capita costs to provide law enforcement and traffic control, solid waste collection and disposal, and fire and rescue services throughout the County as a whole, based on the expenditures for such services as shown in the County's most recent Comprehensive Annual Financial Report ("CAFR") and based on the estimated population of the County as shown by the most recent decennial census or the most recent population estimate by the Bureau of the Census, whichever is later. The product of that calculation shall then be divided by two. 22 Draft -- 1/5/99 ~~~ For purposes of this Section, "law enforcement and traffic control" shall include all expenses to provide law enforcement services and traffic control (including police traffic services, alcohol countermeasures, and driver improvement services), but shall not include the costs of detention services (such as the County jail), the costs of courtroom security, or the costs of service of process. "Solid waste collection and disposal" shall include all expenses for the collection and disposal of residential, commercial, or industrial solid waste, but shall not include costs of recycling solid waste. "Fire and rescue services" shall include all expenses of providing fire fighting and fire prevention services and ambulance, rescue and paramedic services. The "costs" of those services shall include all operating and capital expenditures by the County as shown on Exhibit F- 1 ("Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance -Budget and Actual -General Fund") of the County's most current CAFR; however, for any capital expenditure funded by debt of any sort, the total expenditure for such capital item shall be excluded, but the annual debt service associated with such capital expenditure shall be included. In addition, the County's "costs" shall not include expenditures from state or federal funds of any kind. 3.12 Limitations on Service Cost Reductions: In computing the Town's share of the Gain Sharing Payments paid by the County as set forth in Section 3.02, any increase in the Service Cost Reductions, as calculated in Section 3.11, shall not exceed, in any fiscal year, twice the rate of increase of the Consumer Price Index for the preceding calendar, or ten percent (10%), whichever is less, compared to the Service Cost 23 Draft -- 1/5/99 Reductions for the preceding fiscal year. The parties further agree that at no time shall the reduction for the costs of such services in Section 3.11 exceed the Town's share of those local tax revenues as calculated in Section 3.02. Therefore, even if the County's costs of providing services as calculated in Section 3.11 should exceed the Town's share of such tax revenues, the Town shall have no obligation to make any payment to the County. 3.13 Conditions of Service Cost Reductions: The Service Cost Reductions shall be subtracted from the Gain Sharing Payments paid by the County as set forth in Section 3.02 only if the County itself continues to provide the services specified in Section 3.11 and the County continues to fund each of those services at least partially through its general tax revenues. 3.14 Schedule of Gain Sharing Payments: Beginning with the second half of the 1998-1999 fiscal yeaz and ending December 31, 2018, the County shall make Gain Sharing Payments to the Town in accordance with the schedule described in this Section. The County shall calculate the Gain Sharing Payments for each fiscal year, beginning July 1, 2000, on the basis of the County's audited financial records of the prior yeaz and shall pay to the Town such sums in two installments. The first installment of one-half of the calculated Gain Sharing Payments shall be due on December 31 of each fiscal year, and the second installment of one-half of the calculated Gain Sharing Payments shall be due on June 30 of each fiscal year. For the first half of the 2018-19 fiscal year, the County shall make only one payment which shall be due on December 31, 2018. 24 Draft -- 1/5/99 The fiscal year beginning July 1, 2000 will be the first full fiscal year for which audited financial records will be available to determine the tax revenues generated from Newly Constructed Properties. Therefore, the following Gain Sharing Payments shall be made by the County to the Town for the one and one-half fiscal years prior to July 1, 2000. For the second half of the 1998-99 fiscal year, the County shall make a Gain Sharing Payment of $15,500 to the Town on June 30, 1999. During the 1999-2000 fiscal year, the County shall make a Gain Sharing Payment to the Town based on revenues generated by Newly Constructed Properties during the period from January 1, 1999 to June 30, 1999, but in no event shall the Gain Sharing Payments for that fiscal year be less than a total of $31,000, one-half to be' paid on December 31, 1999, and the other half to be paid on June 30, 2000. 3.15 Minimum Payment: In no event shall the Gain Sharing Payments for any fiscal year of this Agreement be less than $31,000, regardless of the Service Cost Reductions or other adjustments that would otherwise apply to the Gain Sharing Payments. 3.16 Appropriation of Sufficient Funds: The County's obligation to make payments under this Section shall be subject to the annual appropriation of sufficient funds by the County Board of Supervisors. 3.17 Recordkeepin~ Requirements. The County agrees to create and maintain all records necessary to make the revenue and expenditure calculations required under this Agreement. The County further agrees to prepare annually a summary of the. Gain 25 Draft -- 1/5/99 h11 rviethe ~~ Sharing Payments between the Town and the County. The summary s a p o d following information: (a) the method by which the County calculated the amount of tax revenue to be shared with the Town for each revenue source, pursuant to Section 3.02 of this Agreement; (b) the adjustments the County made, if any, to the amounts owed to the Town due to the Town's imposition of any Preemptive Taxes, pursuant to Section 3.09 of this Agreement. (c) the method by which the County calculated its annual costs of providing certain services, pursuant to Section 3.11 of this Agreement. (d) a list of all property designated by the County as Newly Constructed Property. The County shall provide the Town with a copy of this summary no later than November 1 of each year during the term of this Agreement. The County agrees to maintain all memoranda and working papers relating to, or used in preparation of each summary of the Gain Sharing Payments in accordance with the regulations concerning financial records retention and disposition promulgated pursuant to the Virginia Public Records Act (Va. Code § 42.1-76 et seg.) by the State Library Board. SECTION 4. JOINT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 26 Draft -- 1/5/99 ,,,, 4.01 Public Improvements for Commercial or Industrial Development: The Town and the County agree to negotiate the joint funding of the costs of providing public improvements (such as water and sewer facilities and public roads) for each commercial or industrial development built in East Roanoke County after the effective date of this Agreement. The parties acknowledge that this Agreement does not bind either of them to share in the costs of any such public improvement project. 4.02 Other Public Improvement Funding: The Town and the County further agree to negotiate, during the term of this Agreement, the joint funding of proposed publicly-funded and publicly-owned capital projects (such as a fire station or fire truck), costing $75,000 or more, in the Town or East Roanoke County. The parties acknowledge that this Agreement does not bind either of them to share in the cost of any capital project. 4.03 MacDonald Farm Economic Development Project: The Town and the County further agree to negotiate, during the term of this Agreement, the joint funding of the costs of apublicly-subsidized economic development project ("Project") on the property owned by the Town which is commonly known as the MacDonald Farm (the "Property") in East Roanoke County. The parties acknowledge that this Agreement does not bind either of them to share in the costs of the Project. However, if the parties reach an agreement to fund jointly the costs of development of the Project ("Costs of Development"), then all new tax revenues generated by the Project ("New Tax Revenues") shall be shared by the County with the Town on the basis of the percentage 27 Draft -- 1/5/99 of each locality's total contributions toward the Costs of Development and subject to the following conditions: (a) "New Tax Revenues" shall include all those local tax revenues listed in Section 3.03 of this Agreement collected by the County from the property assessments of the Project and from transactions, privileges and activities directly associated with, or conducted on, the Property. (b) "Costs of Development" shall mean all local funds expended by the County and the Town and any in-kind donations by the County and the Town for the development of the Project including, but not limited to, land acquisition, site development, water and sewer facilities, other public improvements, and planning, engineering, architectural and marketing services related directly to the Project. Any state or federal funding contributed by the County or the Town and the time and expenses of County and Town personnel shall be excluded from the Costs of Development. For purposes of this Section, the value of the Property, which the Town proposes to contribute to the Project, shall be deemed to be $1,500,000, which represents the parties' best estimate of the Property's current fair market value. If the parties have not reached an agreement to fund jointly the Costs of Development of the Project, within three years following Court approval of this Agreement, then the value of the Property shall be the fair market value of the Property at such time as the parties do reach agreement on the joint funding of the Development Costs of the Project, based upon an appraisal of the Property by an appraiser selected jointly by the parties. c- 5 28 Draft -- 1/5/99 (c) The County shall pay the Town its percentage of the New Tax Revenues during each fiscal year in accordance with the same payment schedule set forth in Section 3.12 for Gain Sharing Payments, except that the County's obligation to pay a percentage of the New Tax Revenues from the Project shall continue in perpetuity. The initial payment of New Tax Revenues shall begin with the fiscal year in which the first buildings, structures or other improvements on the Property have been completed and revenues generated. (d) The New Tax Revenues generated by the Project shall be distributed in accordance with the provisions of this Section and shall not be considered part of the tax revenues subject to the separate gain sharing provisions in Section 3.02. However, if the Property is developed without an agreement, the distribution of revenues will not be based on the provisions of this Section and will instead be distributed as follows: (i) if neither the County nor the Town participate in funding the Costs of Development, then the Property shall constitute Newly Constructed Property and the tax revenues from the Property shall be subject to the gain sharing provisions of Section 3.02; (ii) if the County does not participate in funding the Costs of Development, but the Town does expend local funds for the Costs of Development, the Town shall receive all New Tax Revenues from the Property; (iii) if the Town does not participate in funding the Costs of Development, but the County does expend local funds for the Costs of Development, the County will receive all New Tax Revenues from the Property. 29 Draft -- 1/5/99 L° '.~ (e) The County's obligation to make payments to the Town as provided in this Section is subject to the annual appropriation of sufficient funds by the County Board of Supervisors. (f) The County agrees to create and maintain all records necessary to determine the Costs of Development and the New Tax Revenues. The County further agrees to prepaze annually a summary of the calculation of the payments to the Town of its share of New Tax Revenues from the Property. SECTION 5. PLANNING AND ZONING 5.01 Promotion of Residential and Commercial Development: The Town and the County agree to encourage and promote residential and commercial development in East Roanoke County. 5.02 Advisory Review of County Planning Actions: The County further agrees to permit the Town to undertake an advisory review of all rezoning applications, vaziance applications, special use permit applications, and proposed amendments to the County's comprehensive plan for tax pazcels located within East Roanoke County. The County shall notify the Town within 5 business days of the filing or submission of any such application or amendment. The Town shall provide comments, if any, no less than 5 business days before public hearings of the County Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors and before final action is to be taken to approve or disapprove of such application or amendment. 30 Draft -- 1/5/99 ~`~ 5.03 Advisory Review of Town Planning Actions: The Town agrees to permit the County to undertake an advisory review of all rezoning applications, variance applications, special use permit applications, and proposed amendments to the Town's comprehensive plan for tax parcels located within one-quarter of a mile of the Vinton- East Roanoke County boundary line. The Town shall notify the County within 5 business days of the filing or submission of any such application or amendment, and the County shall provide comments, if any, no less than 5 business days before public hearings of the Town Planning Commission and the Town Council and before final action is to be taken to approve or disapprove of such application or amendment. SECTION 6. ANNEXATION 6.01 Moratorium on Town or Citizen-Initiated Annexation Suits: The Town agrees that, during the period beginning January 1, 1999 and ending December 31, 2018, it shall not, either directly or indirectly, (i) file an annexation notice against the County with the Commission, (ii) adopt any ordinance for annexation, (iii) institute any court action or other proceeding for annexation against the County, or (iv) support any citizen- initiated annexation suit against the County. 6.02 Mutually Approved Changes of Boundaries: The Town and the County agree that mutually approved boundary adjustments are not prohibited by this Agreement. 6.03 Annexation Where Funding Not Appropriated: The County's obligations to make payments to the Town as provided in this Agreement are subject to the annual 31 Draft -- 1/5/99 appropriation of sufficient funds by the County Board of Supervisors. If the Board of ~ ~ Supervisors declines, for any reason, to appropriate funds sufficient to make any of the payments, or appropriates such sufficient funds, but fails to make any of the payments, the Town is authorized to annex into its corporate limits, by ordinance, the area herein defined as East Roanoke County. The Town agrees to attach as an exhibit to any such ordinance a plan which specifies how the Town will extend its general government services to the newly incorporated area. The incorporation of East Roanoke County into the Town shall automatically take effect on the date specified in the ordinance without any action by the Commission or any court. SECTION 7. REMEDIES AND ENFORCEMENT 7.01 Remedies for Town Breaches: If the Town files an annexation suit in violation of Section 6.01 herein or in any other way breaches this Agreement, the County shall be authorized to stop all payments made to the Town as required by this Agreement, including the payments set forth in Sections 2.02, 2.04, 2.07, 3.02, and 4.03. The Town's failure to withdraw the annexation suit, upon a written request by the County, shall also render null and void the 1979 Utility Service Area Agreement between the Town and the County. 7.02 Resolution of Disputes: If a dispute arises between the Town and the County with respect to the calculation of any payments to be made pursuant to the Agreement, or with respect to any other alleged breach, the parties agree that. the disputed 32 Draft -- 1/5/99 issue shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the terms of the Uniform Arbitration Act, Article 2, Chapter 11 of Title 8.01 of the Code of Virginia, unless the parties jointly agree to resolve the matter by some other process. The Town and the County further agree that judgment on any award rendered as a result of an arbitration may be entered only by the Court affirming and giving full force and effect to this Agreement or by any successor Court appointed pursuant to Title 15.2, Chapter 30, § 15.2-3000 of the Code. SECTION 8. CONSOLIDATION 8.01 Consolidation; Incorporation of East Roanoke County: If the County should agree to consolidate with one or more local governments, and such consolidation is approved by referendum, the Town shall (i) continue to exercise all of the rights, powers and duties provided to towns under the general laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia and as authorized by the Town's Charter and any special legislation enacted by the General Assembly, and shall (ii) be authorized to proceed with the incorporation of East Roanoke County as provided for by Section 5.03 prior to the effective date of the consolidation. SECTION 9. COMMISSION AND COURT APPROVAL 9.01 Commission Approval: The Town and the County agree to initiate the steps necessary and required by Title 15.2, Chapter 34 of the Code (in particular § 15.2- 33 Draft -- 1/5/99 3400, paragraphs 3, 4, 5 and 6 of the Code) and Title 15.2, Chapter 29 of the Code (§ ~~~ 15.2-2900 et seg.) to obtain a review of this Agreement by the Commission. 9.02 Submission to Court: Following the issuance of the report of findings and recommendations by the Commission, the Town and the County agree that they will submit this Agreement in its present form to the Court for approval, as required by Title 15.2, Chapter 34 of the Code (in particular § 15.2-3400, paragraphs 3, 4, 5 and 6 of the Code), unless both parties agree to any change in this Agreement as hereinafter provided. 9.03 Termination if Agreement Modified: The Town and County agree that if this Agreement is not affirmed without modification by the Court, this Agreement shall immediately terminate. However, the parties may waive termination by mutually agreeing to any recommended modifications. SECTION 10. TERM OF AGREEMENT 10.01 Term of the Agreement: This Agreement shall cover the period beginning January 1, 1999 and ending December 31, 2018, except that the provisions of Sections 4.03 and 6.03 shall continue in perpetuity. In the event this Agreement is not approved by the Court until after January 1, 1999, the County's obligation to make payments to the Town as set forth in Sections 2.02, 2.04, 2.07, and 3.02 shall be retroactively effective to apply as of January 1, 1999. 34 Draft -- 1/5/99 ...~,. ~- SECTION 11. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS •'~' _ '~ 11.01 Binding on Future Governing Bodies: This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Town and the County, and each of the future governing bodies of the Town and the County, and upon any successor to either the Town or the County. 11.02 Amendments to Agreement: This Agreement may be amended, modified or supplemented, in whole or in part, by mutual consent of the Town and the County, by a written document of equal formality and dignity, duly executed by the authorized representative of the Town and the County. 11.03 Collection of Personal Property Taxes: The Town and the County mutually agree to assist each other with the collection of personal property taxes from taxpayers in the County and the Town. Specifically, the parties agree that (i) the Town shall accept, at its Treasurer's Office, payments of County personal property taxes and shall remit such amounts to the County; (ii) the County shall accept, at its Treasurer's Office, payments of Town personal property taxes and shall remit such amounts to the Town; and (iii) to the extent permitted by law, the Town shall not issue a Town motor vehicle license decal to any taxpayer who has not paid both Town and County personal property taxes owed at that time; and (iv) to the extent permitted by law, the County shall not issue a County motor vehicle license decal to any taxpayer who has not paid both County and Town personal property taxes owed at that time. These mutual obligations to assist with the 35 f Draft -- 1/5/99 .- collection of personal property taxes shall not include the initiation of court actions to ,~ r collect delinquent personal property taxes. WITNESS the following signatures and seals. TOWN OF VINTON, VIRGINIA, a municipal corporation of the Commonwealth of Virginia By: Mayor ATTEST: Clerk COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia By: Chairman ATTEST: Clerk 579551 v.3 36 Draft 1/5/99 EXHIBIT A EXAMPLE OF CHANGE IN SALES AND USE TAX RATE I. Increase of 1/2% in Sales and Use Tax Rate This Exhibit illustrates the calculation of the County's Payment of Sales and Use Tax Revenues to Vinton, pursuant to Section 2.02 and Section 2.03 of the Agreement, where the General Assembly has authorized an increase in the current one percent (1%) rate. Item 1: Current Vinton Shaze of 1% Local Sales and Use Tax Revenue = $700,000 Based on 11.77% Ratio of Town to County Population as Required by Agreement Item 2: Total Revenue to the County from 1/2% Additional Local = $2,973,662 Sales and Use Tax Authorized by General Assembly Item 3: Actual Town to County Population Ratio, but Not Less than 10% (assumed to be 10% for this example) Item 4: Vinton's Share of Additional Local Sales and Use Tax Revenue from 1/2% Additional Local Sales and Use Tax Formula: Item 2 Multiplied by Item 3 $2,973,662 Times 10% _ 10% _ $297,366 = Item 4 _ $297,366 Town's Shaze of Additional Local Sales and Use Tax Revenue = $297,366 from Additional One-Half of One Percent Tax Rate II. Increase of 1/2% in Sales and Use Tax Rate and Limitation of BPOL Tax Where the General Assembly authorizes an increase in the Local Sales and Use Tax rate, but limits the authority of the County to impose one of the local taxes subject to the gain sharing provisions in Section 3.03 of the Agreement, the Town's shaze of the tax revenue generated by that portion of the Local Sales and Use tax rate exceeding one percent will be reduced in accordance with Section 2.03 of the Agreement. The following is a hypothetical example of the calculation of Vinton's share of the additional Sales and Use Tax revenues under those circumstances, assuming that the General Assembly authorized an increase of Draft 1/5/99 ~~ one-half of one percent in the local option Sales and Use Tax, but at the same time limited the County's authority to impose BPOL taxes by substantially lowering the maximum tax rates: Item 1: Total County Revenue from 1/2% Additional Sales and Use = Tax during First Fiscal Yeaz in which Changes in Taxes are Effective Item 2: Total County Loss of BPOL Revenue during First Fiscal Yeaz = in which Changes in Taxes aze Effective Item 3: Additional Sales and Use Tax (Not Offset by Loss of BPOL = Tax Revenue) to be Shazed with Vinton (First Fiscal Year) Item 4: Ratio of Additional Sales and Use Tax Not Offset by Loss of = BPOL Tax to Total Additional Sales and Use Tax Revenue (based on First Fiscal Yeaz) Item 5: Actual Town to County Population Ratio, but Not Less than = 10% (assumed to be 10% for this example during First and Second Fiscal Years in which Changes in Taxes aze Effective) Item 6: Vinton's Share of Additional Sales and Use Tax Revenue from = 1/2% Additional Local Sales and Use Tax Revenue in First Fiscal Yeaz in which Changes in Taxes are Effective Item 7: Total Additional County Revenue from 1/2% Additional Sales = and Use Tax during Second Fiscal Year in which Changes in Taxes are Effective Item 8: Additional Sales and Use Tax (Not Offset by Loss of BPOL = Tax Revenue) to be Shared with Vinton (Second Fiscal Year) Item 9: Vinton's Share of Additional Sales and Use Tax Revenue from = 1/2% Additional Local Sales and Use Tax Revenue in Second Fiscal Yeaz in which Changes in Taxes aze Effective Formula: First Fiscal Year in which Tax Changes are Effective: Item 1 Minus Item 2 $2,973,662 Minus $2,000,000 $2,973,662 $2,000,000 $973,662 32.74% 10% $97,366 $3,200,000 $1,047,680 $104,768 Item 3 $973,662 2 Draft 1/5/99 Ratio of Item 3 to Item 1 = Item 4 $973,662 Divided by $2,973,662 = 32.74% Total Additional Sales and Use Tax Revenue from 1/2% _ $973,662 Additional Sales and Use Tax Revenue to be Shared with Vinton (Item 1 Times Item 4) Town Share -Item 5 (10%) _ $97,366 Second Fiscal Year in which Tax Changes are Effective: Item 7 Times Item 4 = Item 8 $3,200,000 Times 32.74% _ $1,047,680 Total Additional Sales and Use Tax Revenue from 1/2% _ $1,047,680 Additional Sales and Use Tax Revenue to be Shared with Vinton Town Share -Item 5 (14%) _ $104,768 #582739 vl ~-' J'c- 3 ~"- S EXHIBIT "B" This exhibit is a map showing the boundaries and will be made available at the Board meeting. Draft 1/5/99 ,~ -- ~ EXHIBIT C EXAMPLE OF GAIN SHARING PAYMENTS TO THE TOWN OF VINTON This Exhibit illustrates the calculation of Gain Sharing Payments to be made to the Town pursuant to Section 3.02 of the Agreement. It gives a sample computation of the Town's share of local tax revenues subject to the Gain Sharing Payments and then shows an example of adjustments pursuant to Section 3.10 and 3.11 for Excess Sales Tax Payments and for Service Cost Reductions, based on the County's 1996-97 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report ("CAFR"). Finally, it illustrates the local taxes to be shared pursuant to Section 3.07 of the Agreement where the General Assembly replaces an existing local tax subject to the Gain Sharing Payments with a new local tax. I. TOWN'S SHARE OF LOCAL TAX REVENUES A. Real Estate Taxes Item 1: Number of Newly Constructed Properties Item 2: County Tax Rate Item 3: Total Assessed Value (assume for this example that each Newly Constructed Property has an assessed value of $135,000) Item 4: Distribution of real estate tax revenue: 50% County 50% Town Formula: Total Assessed Value of Newly Constructed Properties $3,375,000 Total real estate tax revenue from Newly Constructed Properties County Share Town Share = 25 assumed _ $1.13/$100 assessed value _ $3,375,000 X County Tax Rate X $1.13 /$100 value _ $38,137 _ $19,068 _ $19,068 Draft 1/5/99 B. Personal Property Taxes Personal property tax revenues collected from owners of Newly Constructed Properties used for residential purposes will be estimated by calculating the ratio of personal property taxes collected throughout the County as a whole (less personal property taxes paid by businesses) to real property taxes collected throughout the County as a whole and multiplying the real estate tax revenues collected from Newly Constructed Properties by that ratio. Item 1: Total Real Estate Tax Revenue Item 2: Total Personal Property Tax Revenue (including State payments reimbursing County for personal property taxes) Item 3: Deduct Personal Property Taxes Paid by Businesses Item 4: Total Adjusted Personal Property Tax Revenue Item 5: Personal Property to Real Estate Tax Ratio Formula: Ratio of Personal Property Tax Revenues to Real Estate Tax Revenues Item 4 Divided by Item 1 $15,158,727 divided by $41,956,514 ~~ _ $41,956,514 (from CAFR) _ $19,158,727 (from CAFR) _ $4,000,000 (County records) _ $15,15 8,727 = 36% = Ratio = 36% Calculation of Tax to be shared: _ $38,137 Total Real Estate Tax Revenue from Newly Constructed Properties Multiplied by Ratio = 36% Estimated Personal Property Tax Revenue to be shared = $13,729 County Share = $6,865 Town Share = $6,865 2 Draft 1/5/99 C. Motor Vehicle License Taxes Motor vehicle license tax revenue collected from owners of Newly Constructed Properties used for residential purposes will be estimated by calculating the ratio of total motor vehicle license taxes collected throughout the County as a whole to total personal property taxes collected throughout the County as a whole, multiplied by the total personal property taxes of Newly Constructed Properties. Item I : Total Personal Property Tax Revenue Item 2: Total Motor Vehicle License Tax Revenue Item 3: Total Personal Property Tax Revenue from Newly Constructed Properties (as estimated above) Item 4: Ratio of Personal Property Tax Revenue to Motor Vehicle Tax Revenue Item 5: Total Motor Vehicle License Tax to be Shared Formula: Item 2 Divided by Item 1 ' $1,532,536 Divided by $19,158,727 Multiply item 3 by Item 4 Total Motor Vehicle License Tax Revenue County Share Town Share ~ -.~ _ $19,158,727 (from CAFR) _ $1,532,536 (from CAFR) _ $13,729 = 7.99% _ $1,097 = Item 4 = 7.99% = Item 5 _ $1,097 $548 $548 D. Local Tax Revenues from Newly Constructed Properties Used for CommerciaUIndustrial Properties The Gain Sharing Payments also include local taxes generated by Newly Constructed Properties used for commercial or industrial purposes. The personal property and motor vehicle license taxes for such properties will be determined on the basis of the actual taxes collected from each such Property and will not be estimated, as will be done for Newly Constructed Properties used for residential purposes. Other local taxes generated by such commercial or industrial Properties, including Machinery and Tool tax, BPOL tax, Bank Franchise tax, Food and Beverage tax, Admission tax and Transient Occupancy tax, shall be determined for each Property and shared equally. Draft 1/5/99 II. SERVICE COST REDUCTIONS ~ ~~ The Town's 50%-share of tax revenues collected from Newly Constructed Properties shall be reduced by a sum equal to 50% of the County's costs to provide law enforcement and traffic control, solid waste collection and disposal, and fire and rescue services to Newly Constructed Properties in East Roanoke County. The following is an example of the determination of the Service Cost Reductions. Item 1: Calculation of population of Newly Constructed Properties Average number of persons per detached household (most = 2.54 current U.S. Census) Number of Newly Constructed Properties = 25 assumed Total Number of persons in Newly Constructed Properties = 63.5 Item 2: Calculation of Expenses to Serve Newly Constructed Properties Law enforcement and traffic control (from CAFR) _ $7,908,793 Estimated County Population from 1995 U.S. Census estimate = 81,717 Cost per capita = $96.78 63.5 persons for Newly Constructed Properties multiplied by = $6,146 $96.78 Solid Waste Collection and Disposal (from CAFR) _ $3,552,404 Estimated County Population from 1995 U.S. Census estimate = 81,717 Cost per capita = $43.47 63.5 persons for Newly Constructed Properties multiplied by = $2,760 $43.47 Fire and Rescue (from CAFR) _ $4,171,256 Estimated County Population from 1995 U.S. Census estimate = 81,717 Cost per capita = $51.05 63.5 persons for Newly Constructed Properties multiplied by = $3,242 $51.05 Total Expenses Shared with Roanoke County = $12,148 County Share = $6,074 Town Share = $6,074 4 Draft 1/5/99 III. EXCESS SALES TAX ADJUSTMENT ~~ ~ The Town's share of local tax revenues from Newly Constructed Properties shall be reduced by a sum equal to 50% of the amount of the Local Sales and Use tax revenues received by the Town pursuant to Section 2.02 of the Agreement that exceeds the amount required to be paid to the Town by Chapter 191 of the 1966 Acts of the General Assembly. Under Section 2.02 of the Agreement, the payment of Local Sales and Use tax is based on a ratio of 11.77%. The actual Town to County population ratio is 9.65% based on the 1990 population. The minimum population ratio for determining the "excess" Sales and Use tax shall be 10%. The following is an example of the calculation of the excess Sales and Use tax adjustment: During year 1 of the Agreement, the Sales and Use tax revenue paid to Vinton is $704,963 (using the actual FY 1997 payment) based on a ratio of 11.77%. The amount that would have been paid on the basis of a 10% ratio is $598,949. The "excess" Sales and Use tax payment is $106,014, one-half of which ($53,007) is subtracted from the Town's share of local tax revenues from Newly Constructed Properties. IV. CALCULATION OF VINTON'S NET SHARE OF LOCAL TAX REVENUES Vinton's Share of Total Local Tax Revenues from Newly Constructed Properties: Real Property (Vinton Share) $19,068 Personal Property (Vinton Share) $ 6,865 Motor Vehicle License (Vinton Share) $ 548 Total Revenue $26,481 Less: Service Cost Reductions ($6,074) Excess Sales Tax ($53,007) Vinton's Net Share of Local Tax Revenue ($59,081) Minimum Vinton Payment (Section 3.13 of the $31,000 Agreement) 5 Draft 1/5/99 _. ` V. EXAMPLE OF LOCAL TAX REPLACED BY ANOTHER LOCAL TAX Pursuant to Section 3.07 of the Agreement, the Town is entitled to share in the revenues collected by the County from a new local tax that replaces an existing local tax that is subject to the Gain Sharing Payments. The following is an example of the calculation of the revenues to be shared from such a new tax where the General Assembly repeals the BPOL tax but grants the County the authority to impose a local income tax: Item I : Total BPOL Tax Revenue Lost by County from Newly = $600 Constructed Properties during First Fiscal Year in which Changes in Taxes are Effective Item 2: Total Income Tax Revenue from Owners of Newly = $1,000 Constructed Properties during First Fiscal Year in which Changes in Taxes are Effective Item 3: BPOL to Income Tax Ratio = 60% Item 4: Total Local Income Tax to be Shared in First Fiscal Year in = $600 which Changes in Taxes are Effective Item 5. Total Income Tax Revenue from Owners of Newly = $1,400 Constructed Properties during Second Fiscal Year in which Changes in Taxes are Effective Item 6. Total Local Income Tax to be Shared in Second Fiscal Yeaz in = $840 which Changes in Taxes are Effective Formula: First Fiscal Year in which Tax Changes aze Effective: 1 Item 1 Divided by Item 2 = Item 3 $600 Divided by $1,000 = 60% Multiply Item 2 by Item 3 = Item 4 $1,000 by 60% _ $600 Income Tax from Owners of Newly Constructed Properties to = $600 be Shared by County and Town County Share = $300 Town Share = $300 6 Draft 1/5/99 ~_~ Second Fiscal Year in which Tax Changes are Effective: Item 5 Times Item 3 $1,400 Times 60% Income Tax from Owners of Newly Constructed Properties to be Shared by County and Town County Share Town Share #579448 v3 = Item 6 _ $840 _ $840 _ $420 _ $420 7 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: /~ ~ . ~ '`~ ~~~~ ~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: .~x ~ ~J~µ~ _ ~~~ This is the first reading of a proposed ordinance to authorize the conveyance of a 37.46-acre parcel of real estate located in the City of Salem (Tax Map No. 194-1-1). BACKGROUND: The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, has previously declared this property to be surplus property and available for sale to the public. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Roanoke County has received an offer to purchase a 37.86-acre parcel of real estate located in the City of Salem and known as the Lloyd Property. A public notice advertising for bids on the sale of this surplus property will be published in the Roanoke Times on Sunday, March 13, 1999. FISCAL IMPACTS: $ to the Capital Projects Fund. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the first reading of this ordinance and that the County Administrator be authorized to execute the necessary documents to consummate this transaction. Respectfully submitted, au a oney County Attorney March 9, 1999 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING CONVEYANCE OF A 37.86-ACRE PARCEL OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED IN THE CITY OF SALEM (TAX MAP NO. 194-1-1) KNOWN AS THE LLOYD PROPERTY ~ ~. ACTION NO ITEM NUMBER +~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 9, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: REQUEST TO VACATE AS PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY A PORTION OF GARMAN ROAD RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 51, FORT LEWIS ESTATES SUBDIVISION IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT, ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The petitioners, Roanoke County and Kroger Company, are requesting that the Board of Supervisors vacate as public right-of-way a portion of Garman Road and retain portion of rights-of-way as 20 foot water line easement: County staff is recommending that the Board of Supervisors approve the attached ordinance. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: On January 28, 1997, the County funded the reconstruction of Garman Road to align with the intersection of Route 11/460 (West Main Street) and Allegheny Drive. This road project was needed to improve the existing drainage situation along Garman Road and to provide improved access to Kroger's new Vehicle Maintenance Facility and Mid-Atlantic Distribution Facility. As part of our Performance Agreement with Kroger, Roanoke County agreed once the new road was constructed and ready for VDOT acceptance, that the old right-of-way would be vacated in order to remove the encumbrances on the Kroger property. The rights-of--way to be vacated is a portion of Garman Road (Route 929) as shown on the attached map (Exhibit "A). Once the rights-of-way is vacated, the property will be divided and combined with the properties adjacent (Kroger) pursuant to the requirements of Title 15.2, Chapter 22, Code of Virginia, 1950 (as amended) as cited in Section 15.2-2274. ~, f- a Roanoke County staff has received no objections to this petition and requests that the described rights-of-way shown on the attached map (Exhibit "A") be vacated in accordance with Chapter 22, Title 15.2-2272(2), Code of Virginia 1950, as amended. Staff requests that this vacation is made subject to the County reserving a 20 foot water line easement as shown on the attached map (Exhibit "B"). A first reading of the proposed ordinance is scheduled for March 9,1999; a Public Hearing and second reading is scheduled for March 23,1999. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: County staff is requesting that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors approve the first reading to vacate the rights-of-way as described earlier and to instruct the County Attorney to prepare the necessary ordinance with the condition that a 20 foot water line easement be retained which is shown on the attached map (Exhibit ~,B,~ S!d$MITTED BY: Arnold Covey, Director Community Developme Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: pc: Paul Mahoney, County Attorney APPROVED BY: ~~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator VOTE No Yes Abs Harrison _ Johnson _ McNamara Minnix Nickens 2 ,,~ ~-..,~ IJ Se Map 55,09 \ 1 100' .,A., ~c 1 J PROPOSED ADDITION SHO fl'N IN GRAY DESCRIPTION: GARMAN ROAD LENGTH: (1) 0.21 miles RIGHT OF A'AY.• (>) 50/60 feet varies PAVEMENT WIDTH: (1) 36 feet SERVICE: (1) REPLACING EXISTING ROAD ROANOKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ROAD ACCEPTANCE & ABANDONMENT OF GARMAN ROAD 55.03 EXHIBIT "B" ATE ~ ,5. A~~p ~~11 ~ p P~~-~ TA ,¢'55.03-3-3 ~N/F PROPERTY OF TOPf/ALCO, /NC. D.B. 1515, PG. 663 LOT 21 oo. E 0 N bo 9~ NEW TRACT :4 " TAX ,#55.03-1-20 ~ PROPERTY OF \~ TOPI/ALCO, INC. D.B. 1543, PG. 961 / \ N~ \m 1p b O m $,~ TOTAL AREA 1D BE' VACATED Z BOUNDED BY CL714NE74S \ 1 A/ROIUGH 5 TO 1 ~~ ~ .J7, 470 .£F. ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ h ~" .~ TAX ,x'55.03-3-4 PROPERTY OF TOP~ALCO, /NC. D.B. 1515, PG. 663 FORT LEWIS ESTATES" \ P.B. 3, PG. 51 ~ \ O O.B60 AC / ~ \ ~ / `_ \~-.~ a, D /EW TRACT B" ~ TAX x'55 03-1-21 P ~ \ ,, . PROPERTY OF LOT 22 ~ TOPI/ALCO, /NC. VVV"' 0. B. 1549, PG. 1559 TAX /'55.03-3-5 \ PROPERTY OF TOPI/ALCO, /NC. Q Q / ~~1 J ~~ D.B. 1515, PG. 663 EX. EX/SANG \ `~ C-1 D.B. DEED BOGW / PG PAGr< DELTA = 25i77'.3~' P.B. PLAT BOGW RAD/US = J62.00' R/IV R/GHT-Gl~ WAY LOT 23 TANl~NT = BQ67' AC ACRES LENGA~/ = 15Q75' SF. Sl~lf/ARE FEET TAX x'55.03-3-6 v CHD. BEAR/NG = S 3:3650' E ' N/~' NOW LW FLl?MERL Y PROPERTY OF (.7~/La40 = 157.48 TOPI/ALCD, /NC. \ O.B. 1515, PG. 663 /~~.5"•' 1. A//S PLOT WAS PREPARED N/A~OY/T ASE BENE)~1T ~ A 3 CURRENT RILE REPCa4T AND A/ERE A/AY EX/ST S 167037" E EiVCUMETRANCES NOT Sf/ONN HEREQ1/. 4 4869' 2. A/E PURPQSE A~ A//S PUT /S R7 ~ACA7E A PG4AGbV 1475, L7~ GARA/AN ROAD. ,~ A~/S PUT /S BASED ON A CURRENT fIELO SURI~E'Y. / ~~ PLAT SHOWING A PORTION OF GARMAN ROAD - TO BE VACATED AND WATERLINE EASEMENT - BEING RESERVED BY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LTx of OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA o~~~3_4_g9yr~~, SITUATED ALONG U.S. ROUTE #460 & X11 ~ r B. LEE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT v HENDERSON, JR ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA ~ l~'~~"iO~`~; N o. 1480 r SCALE 1" = 100' DATE: 4 MARCH 1999 LUMSDEN ASSOCIATES, P.C. ~9ND 3UR~~or- - ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS-PLANNERS ROANOKE, YIFIOlN1A _w axo~rt~t~o~sa~aox~daHa~~i-i-in~arRio.i_i.~~o ~(papuauz~ s~e `OS6T) ~iui~.ztA3o apo~ ai~~~o Z'ZLZZ-Z'Si§ u~~ aau~p.ioaae ui `eiui~~iiA `~f~uno~ axou~eog~o ~zno~ ~ma.zi~ au~~o aai~p s,~.iai~ auk ui pap.zoaai aq ~s aau~p.zo s~~~o ~doa pai~i~zaa ~ pue `uor~dop~e s~i ~o a~~ep ai~~ uzo.~ pine uo ani~aa~a aq ii~us aaueuip.~o sn~~ ~~us ~ £ ~., r-- ~. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 9, 1999 ORDINANCE VACATING AND CLOSING AS PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY A PORTION OF GARMAN ROAD (RT. 929) SHOWN IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 51 (CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT) WHEREAS, Roanoke County and the Kroger Company (Topvalco, Inc.), the Petitioners, have requested that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, vacate and close as public right-of--way a portion of Garman Road, measuring fifty feet (50') in width and 0.16 miles in length, extending from West Main Street (Route 11/460), being shown and dedicated on plat of Fort Lewis Estates, recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Plat Book 3, Page 51; and, WHEREAS, the Kroger Company (Topvalco, Inc.), is the owner of the parcels of land adjacent to Garman Road, said parcels being designated on the Roanoke County Land Records as 55.03-3-3, 55.03-3-4, 55.03-3-5, 55.03-3-6, 55.03-1-20 and 55.03-1-21, in the Catawba Magisterial District; and, WHEREAS, § 15.2-2272.2 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended) requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by § 15.2-2204 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), and the first reading of this ordinance was held on March 9, 1999; the public hearing and second reading of this ordinance was held on March 23, 1999. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: -~ 1. That a portion ofright-of--way, situate in the Catawba Magisterial District and known as Garman Road, measuring fifty feet (50') in width and 0.16 miles in length, extending from West Main Street (Route 11/460), as shown on plat of Fort Lewis Estates, recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 3, Page 51, be, and hereby is, vacated and closed pursuant to Section 15.2-2272 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), subject to the following conditions: a. That a perpetual water line easement, twenty feet (20') in width, and extending southeasterly from West Main Street (Route 11/460) a distance of 0.16 miles, to construct, install, improve, operate, inspect, use, maintain, remove, monitor, repair or replace present or future water lines, pipes, facilities, system and other necessary or related structures, appurtenances and improvements, together with the right of ingress and egress thereto from a public road, is hereby reserved and retained. The location of said easement is shown and designated as " 20' WATERLINE EASEMENT BEING RESERVED BY ROANOKE COUNTY" on the plat entitled 'A Portion of Garman Road - To be Vacated and Waterline Easement -Being Reserved by Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia' prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C., dated March 4, 1999, attached hereto and made a part hereof. b. That fee simple title to the centerline of Garman Road shall vest in the owners of the abutting properties as provided in § 15.2-2274 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), subject to the above-described water line easement and subject to the condition that the vacated area of land shall be added and combined, by deed or by plat, to said abutting properties, in compliance with the Roanoke County Subdivision and Zoning Ordinances, and other applicable laws and regulations. c. That all costs and expenses associated herewith, including but not limited to publication, survey and recordation costs, shall be the responsibility of the Petitioners; and, 2. That the County Administrator, an Assistant County Administrator, or any County Subdivision Agent is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish the provisions of this ordinance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 2 E%HIBIT "B" UTE 11 ~D p # U ~~ e~ IES~ 11.95' Q•6~R/"' APR ~ ~ 5 rAX ,¢55.03-3-3 ~N/F PROPERTY OF TOP~ALCO, INC. D.B. 1515, PG. 663 LOT 21 TAX ,¢55.03-3-4 PROPERTY OF TOP~ALCO, /NC. D.B. 1515, PG. 663 "FORT LEW/S ESTATES" P.B. 3, PG. 51 r E ~ N 50• zW~ °~~' NEW JRACT "A " TAX ,~S5.03-1-20 ~ ~- c~ PROPERTY OF .~ \a TOPI/ALCD, INC. D.B. 1543, PG. 961 \ ~~ N rn \~ s r,, ~~ TOTAL AREA lt7 BE VACATED Z BOUNDED BY COYPNERS \ 1 1NROIU(~/ 5 TD 1 ~~ ~ ~ 37,470 SvF. i ~s \ ~ 0.860 AC / ~ ~ y ~a'-c c~ ~, ~' ~Ew TRACT "a" ~, ~ TAX ,~'S5.03-1-21 \ ~ PROPERTY OF LOT 22 TOPI/ALCO, INC. \ D.B. 1549, PG. 1559 LE EX. D.B. PC P.B. R/IY l AC. SLF. _ N/~ NOW U'P FGI4MERL Y NOTF,~' TAX ,~S5.03-3-5 \ , PROPERTY OF ' '0, INC. ~- PG. 663 v .\ ~/ LOT 23 TAX ,¢55.03-3-6 V PROPERTY OF TOPI/ALCO, INC. D.B. 1515, PG. 663 ~~% i Q 0 ~~1 J~ `~ C-1 DEL TA = 25n7'33" RAD/US =362.00' rANCENr = eos7' LENCIN = 156f 75' CHD. BEAR/NG = S 3:3x'50" E CHORD = 157.48' \/' '~ V ,' M`r'1 1. TN/S PLAT WAS PREPARED N17NG1UT INE BENF- CURRENT ATLE REPA4T AND THERE AIA Y ENCUMBRANCES NOT SJy01M/ H£REGW. 2. 7NE PURPOSE Ole IN/S PLAT /S Tt7 ' 171" GARA/AN ROAD. 3 TH/S PLAT /S BASED ON A C ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER ~'"` AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 9, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: REQUEST TO VACATE AS PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY WASHINGTON ROAD RECORDED IN PLAT 1, PAGE 363, PINKARD COURT SUBDIVISION IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT, ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The petitioner, Lowe's Corporation, is requesting that the Board of Supervisors vacate as public right-of--way Washington Road. County staff is recommending that the Board of Supervisors approve the attached ordinance. BACKGROUND: In order for Lowe's Corporation to move forward with their development plans for the Pinkard Court Subdivision, County staff proceeded upon the petition of the residents of the Pinkard Court Subdivision to abandon and vacate the public streets and rights-of-way in the subdivision. On November 18, 1997, staff submitted a report to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors requesting authorization to give notice to the Commonwealth Transportation Board to proceed with the abandonment of the public streets in the Pinkard Court Subdivision. On February 6, 1998, Roanoke County was notified by the Commonwealth Transportation Board that the requested streets in the Pinkard Court Subdivision were abandoned. On February 10, 1998, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors vacated all of the public right-of-ways and alleys except Washington Road, portion of View Avenue and drainage easement in the Pinkard Court Subdivision. ~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: At the time, staff was moving forward with the vacation of Pinkard Avenue, Meadow View Road, Booker Road and Summit Avenue the several properties adjacent to Washington Avenue were under different ownership. Roanoke County was required to maintain access to the properties. Since then, Lowe's Corporation has purchased all properties fronting on Washington Road thus eliminating any need of the public right-of-way. Once the rights-of-way is vacated, the property will be divided and combined with the properties adjacent pursuant to the requirements of Title 15.2, Chapter 22, Code of Virginia, 1950 (as amended) as cited in Section 15.2-2274. Roanoke County staff has received no objections to this petition and requests that the described right-of-way shown on the attached map (Exhibit "A") be vacated in accordance with Chapter 22, Title 15.2-2272(2), Code of Virginia 1950, as amended. A first reading of the proposed ordinance is scheduled for March 9, 1999; a Public Hearing and second reading is scheduled for March 23, 1999. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: County staff is requesting that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors approve the first reading of ordinance to vacate and close as public right-of-way Washington Road. SUBMITTED BY: Arnold Covey, Director Department of Community Development Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator VOTE No Yes Abs Harrison Johnson McNamara Minnix Nickens 2 ROANOKE COUNTY WASHINGTON ROAD DEPARTMENT OF TO BE VACATED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tax Map No. 87.08-1-5 02--24-99 • ~ L'ViiTD TT ~~n~~ •/ ~- 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 9, 1999 ORDINANCE VACATING AND CLOSING AS PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY WASHINGTON ROAD IN PINKARD COURT SUBDIVISION SHOWN IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 363 WHEREAS, the Petitioner, Lowe's Home Centers, Inc., is the owner of the lots in Pinkard Court Subdivision and the properties fronting on the southwest side of Washington Road in said subdivision; and, WHEREAS, the Petitioner is in the process of developing the properties for a retail business in the County of Roanoke; and, WHEREAS, the Petitioner has requested that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, vacate and close Washington Road as public right-of--way, said street having been created and shown on the "Map of Pinkard Court" recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 363; and, WHEREAS, a portion of Valley Avenue, all of Pinkazd Avenue, Meadow View Road, Booker Road, and Summit Avenue, and all alleys in Pinkard Court Subdivision have been previously vacated pursuant to Ordinance # 021098-9; and, WHEREAS, Washington Road is no longer required as a public right-of--way; and, WHEREAS, §15.2-2272.2 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended) requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by § 15.2 March 9, 1999; the public hearing and second reading of this ordinance was held on March 23, 1999. F3 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the public right-of--way, situate in the Cave Spring Magisterial District of Roanoke County, shown and cross-hatched on Exhibit A attached hereto, and referenced as Washington Road, created on plat entitled "Map of Pinkard Court", recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 1, Page 363, be, and hereby is, vacated and closed pursuant to Section 15.2-2272 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), subject to the following conditions: a. That fee simple title to said road shall vest in the owner(s) of the abutting properties within the subdivision as provided in § 15.2-2274 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), subject to the condition that the vacated areas of land shall be added and combined, by deed or by plat, to said abutting property, in compliance with the Roanoke County Subdivision and Zoning Ordinances, and other applicable laws and regulations. b. That all costs and expenses associated herewith, including but not limited to publication, survey and recordation costs, shall be the responsibility of the Petitioner, Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.; and, 2. That the County Administrator, any Assistant County Administrator, or any County Subdivision Agent, is hereby authorized to execute such other documents and take such further actions on behalf of Roanoke County as may be necessary to accomplish the provisions of this ordinance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 2 F-3 3. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption, and a certified copy of this ordinance shall be recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in accordance with §15.2-2272.2 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended). G:\ATTORNEY\VLH\AGENDA\ROADS\W ASHNGTN.ORD 3 < <. ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 9, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE TO VACATE A PORTION OF A 15-FOOT DRAINAGE EASEMENT ON PLAT SHOWING SECTION NO. 1, EDGEMONT OF VINTON, PLAT BOOK 16, PG 41, AND FURTHER SHOWN ON LOT 5, BLOCK 3, SECTION 2, EDGEMONT OF VINTON, PLAT BOOK 18, PAGE 130, AND REVISED PLAT OF SECTION NO. 2, EDGEMONT OF VINTON, PLAT BOOK 18, PAGE 171, IN THE VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (TAX MAP NO. 61.02-7-1) COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The developer, Charles R. Simpson has requested Roanoke County to vacate a portion (Exhibit A) of a donated drainage easement, Lot 5, Block 3, Section 2, dedicated with a subdivision plat, Edgemont of Vinton, Section 2, P.B. 18, PG 171. This vacation will allow the developer to construct a similar home on Lot 5 that is consistent with the neighborhood. The developer has acquired the necessary easements to convey the drainage from the right-of-way to a natural watercourse so the Virginia Department of Transportation will accept the streets. Under today's consent agenda, these drainage easements are being donated to replace the vacation of this existing easement. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Department of Community Development staff recommends the vacation of a portion of the existing drainage easement as shown on the attached plat. 1 G-y SUBMITTED BY: ~ ~ ~ Arnold Covey, Director Department of Community Dev opment ACTION Approved ()Motion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Harrison Johnson McNamara Minnix Nickens pc: Vickie L. Huffman, Assistant County Attorney Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator VOTE No Yes Abs 2 x Post-itm Fax Note i671 oa1e t Pa9e9~ To - ., Fvo ~~ Co Ca. u r' Pflone S Phone M ~~ Fan p C~ $ ~` Fax M 7.5' IN ASE UNE BEARING DISTANCE 1-2 44' ' 34.91 2-3 7 4.8 CH. 3-4 '1 4.31 4-5 5 32.06 5-i N '54'E 7.77 CURVE DATA FOR 2-3: RADIUS ~ 22.50' LENGTH - 4.85' DELTA = 11'51'11" -_ ~J ~. Jv / G 4-C~~ Ng ~ ' ~~ ~ ~'Q8- ~~~ s~ti EXI E ST 5\~ O X 1ST -~ ~. P U~ /i `_ BLOCK 3, SECTION No. 1 'EDGEMONT OF VINTON' (P.B. ~B, PG. 41) M 9 L~ r----.~~ -_~ ~ ~ a ;n Q 4..r DoT 4 ~m 1~x 2 ~' PROPOSED 7.5' DRAINAGE EASEMENT h 8Y SEPARATE DEED PROPOSED 15' DRAINAGE EASEMENT BY SEPARATE DEED PARCEL A-1 GREYSTOKE PARTNERSHIP SU6DIVISION (D.B. 1450, PG. 1138) ~ ~ I \ 5 n. PROPERTY OF ~ CHARLES E JONES, JR. ec DE60RAH C. JONES ~ D.B_ 1803, PG. 1791 ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~,. 4 ~~~ '' NEW 7.5' `~~~~ DRAINAGE EASEMENT ~-~r 6 BLOCK 3. SECTION No. 2 "EDGE110NT OF VINTON` ~ (P_B. 18, PG. 171) 5~ NOTE: 1) THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A CURRENT TITLE REPORT AND THERE MAY EXIST ENCUMBRANCES WHICH AFFECT THE PROPERTY NOT SHOWN HEREON_ PLAT SHOWING _,,.'!'~*+~.~,. NEW 7.5' DRAINAGE EASEMENT EASFME~ -t'O D.. - ~ l LOCATED ON BE VAC~T~~ ~~Q~~>?a~ LOT 5, BLOCK 3, SECTION 2 VINCENT K ~~ EDGEMONT (P. B. 18 PG. 171) No. 14289 BEING DEDICATED BY CHARLES E. JONES, JR. & ~ DEBORAH C. JONES TO ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA SCALE 1" 50' DATE: 26 JANUARY 1999 LLTMSDEN AS5QCI S, P. C. ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS CANNERS ROANOKE, VIRGI A L' ` F~/ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 9, 1999 ORDINANCE TO VACATE A PORTION OF A 15-FOOT DRAINAGE EASEMENT ON PLAT SHOWING SECTION NO. 1, EDGEMONT OF VINTON, PLAT BOOK 16, PAGE 41, AND FURTHER SHOWN ON LOT 5, BLOCK 3, SECTION 2, EDGEMONT OF VINTON, PLAT BOOK 18, PAGE 130, AND REVISED PLAT OF SECTION NO. 2, EDGEMONT OF VINTON, PLAT BOOK 18, PAGE 171, IN THE VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (TAX MAP NO. 61.02-7-1) WHEREAS, by subdivision plat entitled `PLAT SHOWING SECTION NO. 1 "EDGEMONT OF VINTON,", dated September 10, 1993, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Plat Book 16, page 41, a fifteen-foot (15') drainage easement was shown and created on remaining portion of Tax #61.02-1-52, Property of C. & S. Development Corp., the subject easement being designated on said plat as "NEW 15' D.E."; and, WHEREAS, by said subdivision plat entitled `PLAT OF SUBDIVISION FOR C. & S. DEV. CORP. CREATING HEREON SECTION NO. 2, "EDGEMONT OF VINTON"', dated February 24, 1995, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 18, page 130, the existing fifteen- foot (15') drainage easement was shown on Lot 5, Block 3, Section 2, the subject easement being designated on said plat as "EXIST. 15' D.E."; and WHEREAS, the subject easement is further shown on Lot 5, Block 3, Section 2 of `PLAT OF SUBDIVISION FOR C. & S. DEV. CORP. CREATING HEREON REVISED SECTION NO. 2 "EDGEMONT OF VINTON"', dated February 24, 1995, revised May 20, 1996, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 18, page 171, and designated on said plat as "EXIST. 15' D.E."; and, F-~ WHEREAS, the Petitioner, Charles R. Simpson; has requested that the above-described existing 15' drainage easement, be vacated, and the current owners of Lot 5, Block 3, Section 2, Edgemont of Vinton, Charles E. Jones, Jr. and Deborah C. Jones, concur with the request; and, WHEREAS, the construction of a proposed dwelling on Lot 5 will result in an encroachment on the subject drainage easement and the Petitioner has requested that it be vacated pursuant to § 15.2-2272.2 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended); and, WHEREAS, this vacation will not involve any cost to the County and the affected County departments have raised no objection; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by § 15.2-2204 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), and the first reading of this ordinance was held on March 9, 1999, and the public hearing and second reading of this ordinance was held on March 23, 1999. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the drainage easement being designated and shown as "Easement to be Vacated" on Exhibit A attached hereto, said easement having been dedicated on `PLAT SHOWING SECTION NO. 1 "EDGEMONT OF VINTON"', dated September 10, 1993, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 16, page 41, and further shown on `PLAT OF SUBDIVISION FOR C. & S. DEV. CORP. CREATING HEREON SECTION NO. 2, "EDGEMONT OF VINTON"', dated February 24, 1995, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 18, page 130, and further shown on `PLAT OF SUBDIVISION FOR C. & S. DEV. CORP. CREATING HEREON REVISED SECTION N0.2 "EDGEMONT OF VINTON"', dated February 24, 1995, revised May 20, 1996, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 18, page 171, in the Vinton 2 ~Y Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to § 15.2-2272 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), subject to the conditions contained herein. 2. That all costs and expenses associated herewith, including but not limited to publication, survey and recordation costs, shall be the responsibility of the Petitioner. 3. That the County Administrator, or an Assistant County Administrator, is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as maybe necessary to accomplish the provisions of this ordinance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 4. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption, and a certified copy of this ordinance shall be recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in accordance with §15.2-2272.2 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended). G: WTTORNEY~VLH~AGENDA~EDGEMONT.ORD 3 k ACTION # ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 9, 1999 SUBJECT: First Reading of Ordinance Authorizing the Construction of and Financing for a Local Public Works Improvement Project -Little Brushy Mountain Water Project COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~'~'~~ BACKGROUND: The Board of Supervisors previously approved this project on October 14, 1997 with a requirement that a minimum of 40 property owners commit to the project. The project has not been constructed because the minimum participation level had not been met. Staff continued to work with property owners trying to provide an alternative such as reducing the scope of the project. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: In 1996, staff had applied to the State of Virginia for a low interest loan to assist in the construction of this project. The project met the requirements for the loan, but the project ranking was below the cutoff for available funds. In December 1998, staff was notified that funding for this project was now available. The loan from the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Program has an interest rate of 3% and can be financed for 20 years. This financing would be passed on to participating property owners. Letters were mailed to property owners on January 24, 1999 explaining the loan possibilities and requesting signed commitments by February 12, 1999. Staff also attended the civic league meeting on February 1, 1999 to further discuss the project. ~~ The property owners have shown great interest in the low interest loan and 43 property owners have now committed to participate in the project. Tax parcels 45.03-02-09, 10, 11, 12, 13, 13.1 are undeveloped and presently being marketed. It is recommended that if these properties are developed within the timeframe of the special service area the County's normal water connection fees would apply so long as a minimum of $45,000 in off-site fees (6 parcels X $7,500/parcel) is collected. Should the project be approved, it is suggested that a special water service area be established for a period of ten years that includes a fee structure for recovering the construction costs of the water line as properties are connected. The special connection fee for properties that participate initially will be $7,500. Properties that choose to participate at a later date would include a construction cost of $7,500 and the off-site facility fee in effect at the time of connection (presently $2,690). FISCAL IMPACT: If approved the estimated project cost would be $820,000. This represents a construction cost of $780,000 and $40,000 for construction administration and inspection. Funding for the project would be provided by a loan from the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Program with possible supplement from the Utility Fund unappropriated balance. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff feels that improved public water service is critical to this neighborhood. Staff recommends that the project be approved and the attached ordinance be adopted after the second reading on March 23, 1999. It is also recommended that the County administration be allowed to execute a loan agreement with the state up to the full amount of the project cost. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: 0 av ~ , ~~ Gary Robe on, P.E. Utility Direc or ACTION Approved () Motion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator VOTE No Yes Abs Harrison _ Johnson McNamara Minnix _ _ _ Nickens ~r- 1 vD ,E-~ 1J 9~' PROJECT SERVICE AREA HATCHED AREA DENOTES CERTAIN PARCELS THAT ARE SPECIFIED IN THE ATTACHED ORDINANCE AS BEING SUBJECT TO SEPERATE PROVISIONS TO BE ENACTED IN THE EVENT OF SUBDIVISION OF THESE PARCELS SKYVIEW ROAD ~ ~- ~f' `o~~o oqoso ~~~~ i ~/ ~~ ~ °0 ~j. 1 " = 600' MARCH 3, 1999 ~~~ g1 `N.~~R CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA EXIT # 137 LITTLE BRUSHY MOUNTAIN WATER SYSTEM PROJECT ~,5 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 9, 1999 ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE 101497-8 AND AUTHORIZING THE CREATION OF AND FINANCING FOR A LOCAL PUBLIC WORKS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, LITTLE BRUSHY MOUNTAIN WATER PROJECT WHEREAS, Ordinance 101497-8 adopted by the Board on October 14, 1997, authorized the creation of and financing for the Little Brushy Mountain Water Project; however, due to limited citizen participation, the project was not constructed; and WHEREAS, funding is now available through the State of Virginia, Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Program, which program allows for more affordable financing for the participating citizens; WHEREAS, due to substantial changes in the original project authorized by Ordinance 101497-8, that ordinance will be repealed and a new ordinance will be adopted; and WHEREAS, Ordinance 112288-7 authorizes the financing of local public works improvements and the imposition of special assessments upon abutting property owners upon the adoption of an appropriate ordinance by the Board of Supervisors; and WHEREAS, the County Administration has negotiated the extension of the public water system to the Little Brushy Mountain Community; and WHEREAS, the extension of the public water system and the creation of a special utility (water) service area will alleviate a critical public health and safety problem; and WHEREAS, several of the residents have requested that the County allow them to pay their portion of the costs of connection to the public water system over twenty years at an interest rate of 3%, which are the terms of the loan from the Commonwealth of Virginia; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this Ordinance was held on March 9, 1999, and the second reading was held March 23, 1999; and BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\UTILITY\BRUSITY.2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 9, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE DECLARING A PARCEL OF REAL ESTATE TO BE SURPLUS AND ACCEPTING AN OFFER FOR THE SALE OF SAME; NAMELY THE PENN FOREST BOULEVARD WELL LOT COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: This is the fast reading and we are obligated to consider any offer. However, I have real concerns about selling this well lot for any residential uses. It is a marginal lot that will result in one more access on a busy street that will probably be widened in the future. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This is the first reading of an ordinance to sell a surplus well lot, in response to the receipt of an offer for same. BACKGROUND: On October 25, 1994, the Board adopted a policy for the sale or disposal of surplus real estate. Many of the parcels identified as surplus are well lots abandoned with the completion of the reservoir and the water transmission lines. This procedure provided for the annual advertisement and publication of the surplus real estate list, inviting bids from the public. This notice and list of properties were advertised in the Roanoke Times & World News on Apri19, 1995. Once an offer is received, staff submits the offer to the Board of Supervisors in executive session after evaluation by the County Administrator, County Attorney and Property Manager. If the Board wishes to proceed, then the County Attorney prepares an appropriate ordinance for first reading, which constitutes notice that a bona fide offer has been received, and that other written offers may be received unti15:00 p.m, the Friday preceding the next Board meeting. The identity of the offeror and the amount, terms or conditions of the offer or bid will be kept confidential until the second reading. At second reading the Board may accept the best offer received or reject all offers. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The County received one offer to purchase a parcel of real estate identified as "Penn Forest Boulevard Well Lot" -Tax Map Parcel No. 87.06-6-1. 1 F-4 Advertisement for bids for the sale of this surplus property will be published in The Roanoke Times on Sunday, March 13, 1999. Notices will be mailed to the adjoining property owners and a sign will be posted on the property. FISCAL IMPACTS: The proceeds from the sale of this real estate will be deposited into the water fund in accordance with the trust agreements of the 1991 water revenue bonds. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board favorably consider the adoption of the attached ordinance. Respectfully submitted, County Attorney Action Vote No Yes Abs Approved () Motion by Harrison Denied () Johnson Received () McNamara Referred () Minnix to Nickens U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\REALES'T\SURPLUS\SURPLUS.IST 2 ~- G AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 9, 1999 ORDINANCE DECLARING A PARCEL OF REAL ESTATE TO BE SURPLUS AND AN ACCEPTING OFFER FOR THE SALE OF SAME; NAMELY THE PENN FOREST BOULEVARD WELL LOT BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property, having been made available for other public uses before permitting disposition by sale, is hereby declared to be surplus. 2. That an advertisement for bids for the sale of this surplus real estate was advertised in the Roanoke Times & World News on Apri19, 1995, and on March 13, 1999; and 3. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading of this ordinance was held on March 9, 1999, and the second reading was held on March 23, 1999, concerning the disposition of the following parcel of real estate identified as follows: Penn Forest Boulevard Well Lot Tax Map Parcel No. 87.06-6-1 4. That offers for said properties having been received, the offer of to purchase this property for the sum of Dollars is hereby accepted/rejected. 5. That the purchase price for the property will be paid upon delivery of a deed therefor and all proceeds from the sale of this real estate will be deposited into the water fund in accordance with the trust agreements of the 1991 water revenue bonds. 6. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the sale of said property, all of which will be on form approved by the County Attorney. 7. That this ordinance will be effective on and from the date of its adoption. U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\REALEST\SURPLUS\PENNFRST.ORD v. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 9, 1999 ORDINANCE 030999-7 AUTHORIZING QUIT-CLAIM AND RELEASE OF A 20-FOOT WATER LINE EASEMENT WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF BELMONT COURT AND LOCATED BETWEEN LOT 1, BLOCK 1, SECTION 2, AND LOTS 12 AND 13, BLOCK 1, SECTION 2, OF TRIPLE CROWN ESTATES IN THE VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, in order for Belmont Court to be accepted into the state secondary road system, the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) requires that the right-of-way be free and clear of any third party rights or encumbrances; and, WHEREAS, VDOT has requested quit-claim and release of an existing water line easement, twenty feet (20') in width, within the boundaries of Belmont Court and located between Lot 1, Block 1, Section 2, and Lots 12 and 13, Block 1, Section 2, of Triple Crown Estates, being a portion of the easement acquired by deed recorded in Deed Book 1271, page 1482, and further shown on plat recorded in Plat Book 17, page 123, to the Commonwealth of Virginia, subject to certain conditions; and, WHEREAS, it will serve the interests of the public to have Belmont Court accepted into the state secondary road system and the release, subject to the issuance of a permit and other conditions, will not interfere with other public services and is acceptable to the Roanoke County Utility Department. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance. 1 A first reading of this ordinance was held on February 23, 1999; and a second reading was held on March 9, 1999. 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the interests in real estate to be released are hereby made available for other public uses by conveyance to the Commonwealth of Virginia for acceptance of Belmont Court into the state secondary road system by the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT). 3. That quit-claim and release of the water line easement within the boundaries of Belmont Court and located between Lot 1, Block 1, Section 2, and Lots 12 and 13, Block 1, Section 2, of Triple Crown Estates, to the Commonwealth of Virginia, is hereby authorized subject to the following conditions: a. VDOT issuance of a permit for the water lines or facilities. b. The facilities located within the 50-foot right-of-way, between Lot 1, Block 1, Section 2, and Lots 12 and 13, Block 1, Section 2, of Triple Crown Estates, may continue to occupy the street or highway in the existing condition and location. c. The release would be for so long as the subject section of Belmont Court is used as part of the public street or highway system. 4. That the subject easement is not vacated hereby and shall revert to the County in the event of abandonment of the street or highway. 5. That the County Administrator or an Assistant County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such further actions as may be necessary to accomplish this conveyance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 2 That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Harrison A COPY TESTE: 3-~ ~ GLc.r~`J Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 3 G-~ NOF~ TIC `wsT ~ f F ~' SC( Afgq f'S' w toT6 B T~FNtgTCR ~7w/ ~ pRF . Z •. 0. B~ JJ6 COT I / P Sf RBI/ CA.. ~ - 1 4Sr~NG :U' M, TEF.IN[ ~ c3' ; SJ. s B 'o W, FS Rt ' ....~_. _. E s;.MEN~ SEE o 9 12-+ 2 ~ y '~. / / ac~r bC , Tq~ T Pc .,a2 ~p h• 8 ^~° LOT B ''' LOT 5 / DoT ! ' 'J! / , ~ ~' C~ y ~ 0.}l, AC. 1^ 0.}66 AC. N ,l O / ~° s^' /. ~ ~.,+' \ ~' , °pro'J''E `°T,, / +aSnN~ 20' waterline Easement to be = Q ry i / IO.J9' Jdy ~ 1.~. Yri~ , C ' Q 2DIE ,C. 4, 6U? I I ~f AONgCF S ~~. ~r .~ s 71 -~/,~~~ ~~. ;' ;o - ;, ~ y, / , 1, A,.~T•~.. ~ Quitclaimed and Released V ~ tih s \ ~ ~' W .. NEW t9'. ' . .Yw ~ / J J! kFF , '~' ha 'F' \.. W,TER 4NE '~~ ^~ 3 PO ;~ ' / ~y ~, '±,~` ~\ ' ~~ EASENENi ~ a, ~ v~•. a LOT 3 h / oc. ao y / /TRIPLE CROWN ESTATES c g s u. r q, }' P a.~~ a.22o Ac..Y LOT 2 T , ~ ~ ,., 5[Lr:oN I .~d '~' '`F +\ E` BQ ,~~ \o o.?xo ec .`' ~n4i !r~„~~, `~. P.e I_. 1}+ ! it \\\~ \ .F B ~GS ~'3Jp C\C/r`S /~ / 'Y M1 'J`9 ' ~ ^. /~ /, \.~~ LOT 7 ,d \ ~, \ ~ ~)•~99_ 6J J1p~CO~TT 's6 j \ ; /` LOT 1 ~ , '- ~• 91oL 9 O.,Afi AC. ~ 1~ v \\ \ ~ '~~ ff. \JO' E JO O' s~~ ~ , 0 2', AC. "T,: Y. i f 11 K 2 n al ~.'i LOT 8 W ~ .~ Ty ~ ~- ~ ~ - T--f I~<~ ~;1,') ~ \h + 039J C.• y M1' '~ 5600 0 N ^ 1}}~;. ~ fi1'.~ ~! 271 E \ \\ \~ ~.~/eY' +~ JO.4 nr'F t'aS 4fR4 \, ' 19'C.•,'~~ •< O~ m• ~ 29T 59. 3 B ~ 5. Y SGT e 2 r ,~ ~ LOT 9 g~ `: so. T m _" m N LOT 1 Y 99T' .J 0.722 AL ,\O' ^? 0~ N 19'~ 1.11:;' ` 5.. ~ / r ~s'z ~1 ~„ BLOCN 2 as_o .c d ,~ a ~r.i " ~ LOT 10 ~ \o \,. _ : _ e a-- - - >. o J~ I b' ~i 0.112 AL e.~ y ._6155 ~' S 19"l,': S'„ w 6J.> .+°J' 'A ^°~ ti°j ~ ~ }ti. --, ~ I ' LOT 2 29n 9}' \~ ~ ti~'TTV J ~ ~ ~ ~%LOT 11".~h . ~ ~ ~ 1' - ~- ~ J.e EvEW r5' ueaN,eE ~, u ;. < ~ `\^\ sffp.o°J,S. 31 ~~''jj 0711 AC .h "I, ,% .LGT 13 S __ _^-WcN_ _ _17 ~\~. ~~_ 6 'ha0 SqN '~00 / fAPPRUx LOt ti .jic ~~ a! " AC -. '1 _ /-'" -. - _ _ .. f j . ~y ~ ' ` , f IS, ` ~ \ ]~ 100 YEAA ~.- • ~ ', ~ ~'ai l ' ! __ + c_ ~~ ~" c pC. o,. Eooo LOT 12%c ~^4 -~ \ l.T:'Yf., SfN i! ~ ~.:1 `5`l AC, h'/:1~ hE•\ ~.^'( ~ % .._. .~ A \ ~ / 1 S'fw . cGa. > Que. ,~E~ , o'aS?°tyiiz ~~ ? -' S ~ .[ ',. J, ~-N '0',2'0^ E. 99.1: ~~ 82.58'-~ AEMNNING PROPERTY OF \/'~ CgSf Rl ~~ %qRt ~ B ~~ ` ~ ' - iC1_ g9 _~'~ ~[' ~ b) -'~ C~- ~ y J6 VEM 20' Nn'Ek VN: = p ~C k D BUILDERS, INC. / MEYT ~ °n•'~_ -- 5,,1 ,h ~ E,su.e,T _ i9ueA--------- ~ ~ ao Y ' 21.' Acz ~ i 5 nnA']a' w CI i ~ ~ _ -- 209,' 'NEW YARIAaIE. YxE1TM ~ 7 / - - - - - - - - ~,i ~' SANITARY SEWER ANC /~ ~. ~ ~ r ` f ,( ~ ,,. OP. nIN •CE EASEMENT j-• . `'QpT~/ f NEW 20' OR AIN,OE 5E0NEN r5 OF LJ[-UE-SAC ~ ~\ 'rlp. Sf~HO Sf+sT EASEMENT i0 RE`.EAT 10 AOJUNING " , OVMER UPON EXTENSION .` ANL1 OEOICAAON OF Proposed Waterline Easement to be Quitclaimed and Released shown in Gray Description: A 20 foot waterline easement (Deed Book 1271, Page 1482) within the boundaries of Belmont Court and located between Lot 1, Block 1, Section 2 and Lots 12 & 13, Block 1, Section 2 of Triple Crown Estates. ROANOI~E COUNTY Quitclaim and Release of a 20 foot Waterline Easement DEPARTMENfi Os~` within the boundaries of Belmont Court and located COMMUNITY DEYELOP111ENT between Lot 1, Block 1, Section 2 and Lots 12 & 13, Block 1, Section 2 of Triple Crown Estates ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER ~-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 9, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING QUITCLAIM AND RELEASE OF A 20- FOOT WATER LINE EASEMENT WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF BELMONT COURT AND LOCATED BETWEEN LOT 1, BLOCK 1, SECTION 2 AND LOTS 12 AND 13, BLOCK 1, SECTION 2 OF TRIPLE CROWN ESTATES IN THE VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT. rOUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: This is the second reading of the propose release of water line easement within the between Lot 1, Block 1, Section 2 and Lots Crown Estates. d ordinance to authorize quitclaim and boundaries of Belmont Court located 12 and 13, Block 1, Section 2 of Triple By deed of July 15, 1987 recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, Deed Book 1271, Page 1482, the Roanoke Valley society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals conveyed to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County a 20-foot water line easement extending in a southerly direction from Carson Road through the Roanoke Valley Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals property. In August 1994, C&D Builders, Inc., the owner of the property, subsequently subdivided the property by plat showing Section 2, Triple Crown Estates, of record in the aforesaid Clerk's Office, Plat Book 17, Page 123. The 20-foot water line easement described above lies within Section 2 and is beneath Belmont Court. 1 G-i In order for Belmont Court to be accepted into the State Secondary Road System, the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) requires that the right-of-way be free and clear of any third party rights or encumbrances. The quitclaim and release of the subject portion of the water line easement to the Commonwealth of Virginia would be subject to VDOT issuing a permit for such facilities and the condition that the facility located within the 50-foot right of way, with the boundaries of Belmont Court located between Lot 1, Block 1, Section 2 and Lots 12 and 13, Block 1, Section 2 of Triple Crown Estates, may continue to occupy the street in the existing condition and location. The release would be for as long as the subject section of Belmont Court is used as part of the public street or highway system; however, said easement would not be vacated by the Board and would revert to the County in the event of abandonment of the street or highway. The Utility Department is in agreement with this request. 1. Adopt the proposed ordinance authorizing the County Administrator to execute the necessary documents for quitclaims and release of the water line easement within the boundaries of Belmont Court located between Lot 1, Block 1, Section 2, and Lots 12 and 13, Block 1, Section 2 of Triple Crown Estates. 2. Decline to adopt the proposed ordinance, which would result in Belmont Court remaining a private road. Roanoke County staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt the proposed ordinance as provided in Alternative 1. APPROVED BY: Department of Community Elmer C. Hodge lopment County Administrator 2 ACTION Approved ()Motion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) c: Paul Mahoney, County Attorney VOTE No Yes Abs Harrison _ Johnson McNamara Minnix Nickens 6-I 3 ~-i NOR TIC (NxSON / I Sff Afq f r3' W { lprB 6 Jfo~g2fR ~~ip 3opFq !J~ /( - ,:\\ ? E° ~ Gp 5 NESS ' ' ~' CI' m'+A z65P. ~9 / / ae $!'f /N Cn.. _.. _. I.ISi.N:. :U' A. rE R.tN[ „> '~. er 's pro FSj Rr IAS:NENr sEE oe '.s-~ ~ / / 4a. c ' 4~. ~. vc '.e: ~"~ y' ^i~ d LOT 8 s'' LOT 5 / <Dr ' 'J ~ / \ ~~ !yam ry 1 0.3JA AC. ' `~ O.J68 AC. 3 '~ F ~ I° / / .> sr 3`=~J+ ~ ~ .1Y r1` ~~ '~' r B°°p. JT^ f `°j I / ¢DS ~"~C ~ 20' waterline Easement to be ~~ o ro dr t9.ar .r ~" i.~.a\, ~ r^ -LOT 4 6~z / / SFf o©N^ e3~ S9 ~ y^ ~~~ s ~\ Lr'J 7gy ~~/ ~~•~ s,./~, rpryry°'0226 ,ryA, ao°° , / ,°r 3g F~s;;F` ~1 Quitclaimed and Released ~~ .ham f=^\W \°6. I w _' rvEN 15'. 'n ~~~' ~ ~ 'J 'J'A klF^ i/' ~ / ,ry f ~. ~ ~!- WAiER CINE 3 P° 3~ ~ ~, ~~ ~ EASENENt / _.~\ LDT ] 0.~ ' p j•, O ~5' ~' , Po o 220 AG ~ / ~' nor ~~ - / /TRIPLE CROWN ESTATES o-°b = n r ~p 1 Pc:f °[>y. ~ ~' ~` 3'/ LOT 2 --L .i'On ' ~~~ ~ ~t. L Bf S~ B~OM ~m ryo 0._20 AC .~ r ~ c.._~'., ,....j .._ P.8 I ., ~1' ` ~ ;~^~i L L a \(e ^F^ nr ~NJ OJS• G~~k J 2 y'~M1 9g / ~ ~ ` ...-`` LOT A A4 L ~ ~, ~ ~'Q9B_ ~ 6J,JJ03COG~ W i'`B \ ~ y~/e ~ °' LOT i _ r, ~ ~0 6 O.tafi C ~M1 ~\ \ \ .. _~_\ \Jp. S f rSp >°. Sj =~ a 02,0 AC. •'>5 ~i !- ~ PEO(k2 1 t s1 ,1' LOT 8 ~` ~, .~ K y R~ v~ ~ ~. - ._J I < W ~ () 16. ~)`\ 0.J\ C~;L yh hh '~; B\00p >°" W`h0 ~ ~ ~ I\J<-_ .76 n.i:~ ~>' I N 2]'i0'03' C ~ 3' A( t ~ \ \W/NV .~ 7°.M '°:>f, fSE °qq 1,... _9. '.. ,p O~ Q, j 2.3J,,P. ~~ 3 B~ Sy M Y)La~~ g 2~ m rc. ~t9S1 .J > 0 GT 9 O ~ / y SJ~ C N 1905,2 ~ It LOT 1 3IV - F- W I-J a~' ! w BLOCK 2 05_D A(' S 9J ~ TA ` ~eyf , OO 2 ACD.r / \u ~ .__ 6 9 6 r' S4^T' `" A~ JI ~I L ... JC JS• A~ ? On ti ~- - -. ~, m ~Z S 19'2a''S' N a?> . 'J~ \s•^ ° n~/~ ~ ~"'~ ~ __--~ ~ ~l , ' i I LOT 2 29-~_'- ~ \ \ \ 9~~S1N W ' ~I l[~ /:. ~~/LDT 11 h ' ~ . ~ ~ - ~ -\_ ~ ,Y V(K 5' UR4 NAGF sf 2 s. -~r~ " o JIJ Ac ti ~ LGT 13 3 •' ~ ~ ~w' ..~'~ \~ ` \\ f 6FaN ~f qq ~; Sv ,O0 V~/ ~i oO RYE ARE° ~ p~ ~ \ 1. '_' ~ ~_ = f/y y' I ~3 ,,fe e"R 30,. Looo P r; /`LOT ~2~ c' w y', nl - - - - ~ "~ - ~ Jr ~f:SfNf F.\ /' ~~~~ =_'1`53 Ci~'iti ~~l ~ \ ~. -'~~~ I /1 ~ ` \ ..// fR, B°GO ~~ E>.re / o1>~T~S ? ~ l ~N 0^' E BS J , 6=`8~ `\ REMAlvINC. PRnPERTY CF \" fq kfq'q'L':'9 ~\ ~,V9 ~~"L~ 69 A' E ~ \6S' E ~ n y 'Jb V 20 W ck CN, ' oz 1 `C k D BUILDERS INC. ~ // leoeaMf\~ ~~'~ Bp,'~~, ~so5,a• •`'2 .-~ (~ „c;,E~:r I n.2AC_: siroa'JO.w------ ~ 2y ` ~ - ~ ~ ~ _ _ _ _ - _ 20 9a' /~ ~ , NEW \'ARIABLf. W10iN ~1 ~ = i',yl~~ $ANIiARY SEWER ANC j ,/\,~ OR4W AGE EASE MENI \` ~ r ` ftS/ NEW 20' DR nIN AGE ' Y SEGMEN ~S GF CJI-UE-SAC ~ // ~\ Sfr Sf~1'C Sf~Sr EASEMF.NE ~ i0 RE VERi ICI ADJDIWNG i OWNER I/PON EKiENSION ,~. ANO OEDICA i10N OF Proposed Waterline Easement to be Quitclaimed and Released shown in Gray Description: A 20 foot waterline easement (Deed Book 1271, Page 1482) within the boundaries of Belmont Court and located between Lot 1, Block 1, Section 2 and Lots 12 & 13, Block 1, Section 2 of Triple Crown Estates. ROANOKE COUNTY Quitclaim and Release of a 20 foot Waterline Easement DEPARTMENT OF' within the boundaries of Belmont Court and located COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT between Lot 1, Block 1, Section 2 and Lots 12 & 13, Block 1, Section 2 of Triple Crown Estates G- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 9, 1999 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING QUIT-CLAIM AND RELEASE OF A 20- FOOT WATER LINE EASEMENT WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF BELMONT COURT AND LOCATED BETWEEN LOT 1, BLOCK 1, SECTION 2, AND LOTS 12 AND 13, BLOCK 1, SECTION 2, OF TRIPLE CROWN ESTATES IN THE VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, in order for Belmont Court to be accepted into the state secondary road system, the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) requires that the right-of--way be free and clear of any third party rights or encumbrances; and, WHEREAS, VDOT has requested quit-claim and release of an existing water line easement, twenty feet (20') in width, within the boundaries of Belmont Court and located between Lot 1, Block 1, Section 2, and Lots 12 and 13, Block 1, Section 2, of Triple Crown Estates, being a portion of the easement acquired by deed recorded in Deed Book 1271, page 1482, and further shown on plat recorded in Plat Book 17, page 123, to the Commonwealth of Virginia, subject to certain conditions; and, WHEREAS, it will serve the interests of the public to have Belmont Court accepted into the state secondary road system and the release, subject to the issuance of a permit and other conditions, will not interfere with other public services and is acceptable to the Roanoke County Utility Department. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance. A first reading of this ordinance was held on February 23, 1999; and a second reading was held on March 9, 1999. r ~ ~ ~,.. 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the interests in real estate to be released are hereby made available for other public uses by conveyance to the Commonwealth of Virginia for acceptance of Belmont Court into the state secondary road system by the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT). 3. That quit-claim and release of the water line easement within the boundaries of Belmont Court and located between Lot 1, Block 1, Section 2, and Lots 12 and 13, Block 1, Section 2, of Triple Crown Estates, to the Commonwealth of Virginia, is hereby authorized subject to the following conditions: a. VDOT issuance of a permit for the water lines or facilities. b. The facilities located within the 50-foot right-of--way, between Lot 1, Block 1, Section 2, and Lots 12 and 13, Block 1, Section 2, of Triple Crown Estates, may continue to occupy the street or highway in the existing condition and location. c. The release would be for so long as the subject section of Belmont Court is used as part of the public street or highway system. 4. That the subject easement is not vacated hereby and shall revert to the County in the event of abandonment of the street or highway. 5. That the County Administrator or an Assistant County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such further actions as may be necessary to accomplish this conveyance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 6. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. G:~ATTORNEY~VLHIAGENDA~BELMONT.ORD AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 9, 1999 ORDINANCE 030999-9 AMENDING ORDINANCE 090997-5 AUTHORIZING THE CREATION OF AND FINANCING FOR A LOCAL PUBLIC WORKS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, MOUNTAIN HEIGHTS WATER PROJECT WHEREAS, by Ordinance 090997-5 adopted on September 9, 1997, the Board of Supervisors authorized the creation of and financing for a local public works improvement project, namely Mountain Heights Water Project; and WHEREAS, certain terms and conditions were imposed by this ordinance upon property owners in the Project Service Area wishing to participate in this project, one of which was that they elect to participate on or before December 9, 1997; and WHEREAS, the Board desires to expand those terms and conditions to include new property owners in the Project Service Area who acquired their property after the December 9, 1997 deadline stated in Ordinance 090997-5; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 23, 1999; the second reading was held on March 9, 1999. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County as follows: 1. That Ordinance 090997-5 authorizing the creation of and financing for the Mountain Heights Water Project be amended to provide that new property owners in the Project Service Area may apply and receive the benefits provided in Ordinance 090997-5 provided the new property owners apply with the Utility Director within three (3) months of their acquisition of the property. 1 i .~ 2. That the County Administrator is authorized to take such actions and execute such documents as may be necessary to accomplish the purposes of this transaction, all upon form approved the by the County Attorney. 3. That this Ordinance shall take effect on and from the date of its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Harrison A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 9, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 090997-5 AUTHORIZING THE CREATION OF AND FINANCING FOR A LOCAL PUBLIC WORKS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, MOUNTAIN HEIGHTS WATER PROJECT COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS BACKGROUND Several residents in the Mountain Heights Subdivision petitioned Roanoke County for public water service. The residents in this subdivision have experienced poor water quality as well as a shortage of water. Letters were mailed to the residents in the Mountain Heights Subdivision on May 2, 1997. The purpose of these letters was to determine if a majority of the property owners were willing to pay $4,500 for water service. Upon review of the responses it was determined that there were enough participants to go forward with the project. On September 9, 1997, the Board adopted Ordinance 090997-5 which authorized the creation of and financing for the Mountain Heights Water Project. A "Project Service Area" was created for a period of ten years. Any owner of real estate within this service area could participate in and benefit from the public water extension by paying the sum of $3,155 toward construction costs plus the off-site facility fees applicable at the time of connection (presently $2,690). As an incentive for property owners participation, the Board approved a reduction in the off-site facility fee from $2,690 to $1,345 and provided financing for a maximum of 10 years at an interest rate of 8% per annum of the payment of their portion of the cost of extending the public water system to their properties. In order to benefit from these incentives, property owners had to elect to participate on or before December 9, 1997. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION This matter is once again on the Board's agenda due to a citizen request. Mr. Randy Grisso purchased a home in the "Project Service Area" at 1459 Mountain Heights Drive (Tax Map No. 35.04-1-22). in October of 1998. The previous owners had declined to participate in the water project. Mr. Grisso stated that the well on his property had failed and that on January 29, 1999, he requested connection to the County water system. The Utility Department connected Mr. Grisso to the County system on January 30, 1999. At that time Mr. Grisso requested financing of the connection costs. Section 22-82 (2) of the Roanoke County Code provides for landowners to make payments on the off- U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\UTILITY\NIIITHGTS.RPT Z ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER ~ I -- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 9, 1999 SUBJECT: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1. LEAGUE OF OLDER AMERICANS -ADVISORY COUNCIL The one-year term of Thelma Ihrig will expire March 31, 1999. 2. ROANOKE VALLEY GREENWAY COMMISSION The three-year term of Donald Witt will expire April 8, 1999. 3. COMMISSION FOR SENIOR AND PHYSICALLY CHALLENGED CITIZENS Assistant County Administrator John Chambliss has received resignations from Betty Dangerfield and Nancy Hall who represent the Cave Spring Magisterial District on this Task Force, and these representatives need to be replaced. There is no set term for these appointments. Additionally, Wilton B. "Webb" Johnson recently passed away. While Mr. Johnson lived in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, he was appointed by Supervisor Bob Johnson. SUBMITTED BY: .~• Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: C~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator 1 ~. /-E /- 3 ACTION VOTE No. Yes Abs Approved () Motion by: Harrison _ Denied () Johnson _ Received () McNamara- _ _ Referred () Minnix _ _ _ To () Nickens _ _ _ 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 9, 1999 RESOLUTION 030999-8 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM I -CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for March 9, 1999, designated as Item I -Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 7, inclusive, as follows: Approval of Minutes -February 9, 1999 2. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Canterbury Park, Section II. 3. Acceptance of donation of drainage easements to the Board of Supervisors in connection with the development of Edgemont of Vinton, Section 2, located in the Vinton Magisterial District. 4. Resolution requesting that the Virginia Department of Transportation add into the secondary system of state highways a new portion of Route 929 (Garman Road) and abandon a portion of Route 929 (Garman Road) which no longer serves the public need. 5. Donation of a 20 foot drainage easement and a new variable width drainage easement in Orchard Park, Section 2, by F & W Community Development Corporation. 6. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Summerfield, Section 7. '. 7. Request for approval of a Comprehensive Stormwater Detention Agreement with the Virginia Department of Transportation. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Consent Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Harrison A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development 2 '.~ February 9, 1999 ~,, Roanoke County Administration Center 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 February 9, 1999 The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the second Tuesday, and the first regularly scheduled meeting of the month of February, 1999. N RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Johnson called the meeting to order at 3:00 p. m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Bob L. Johnson, Vice Chairman Harry C. Nickens, Supervisors Fenton F. "Spike" Harrison, Joseph McNamara, H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Joseph Obenshain, Senior Assistant County Attorney; Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator; Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator; Anne Marie Green, Director, Community Relations IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES The invocation was given by Reverend Brent Sandy, Grace Brethren Church. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited by all present. February 9, 1999 nn Valley Gateway, Valley Gateway shell building, and coordinated the marketing feasibility study for the McDonald Farm property. As Director of the Partnership, she chaired the Strategic Planning Subcommittee of the Fifth Planning District Regional Alliance, and the strategic plan they wrote received more than $400,000 funding from the Regional Competitiveness Act. Distribution of those funds included a grant to Roanoke County for the Blue Ridge Parkway Interpretation Center and another grant to the Roanoke Valley Greenway Project. 2. Year-end Report on Virginia's Explore Park (Roger F Ellmores Executive Directorl Mr. Ellmore made a slide presentation and advised that Explore had a very successful 1998 season with the general attendance being over 90,000. The paid attendance increased 38% to 49,393, and the on-site educational programs served 15,133 students, an increase of 24%. The Brugh Tavern served over 32,000; and school systems from 22 counties and cities participated in the educational programs. He also described the coming attractions and programs. IN RE: NEW BUSINESS 1. Request to adopt 1999 Priorities established by the Board of Supervisors. (Elmer C Hodge, County Administrator A-020999-1 Mr. Hodge advised that on January 23 and 24, 1999, the Board and key staff February 9, 1999 ~ ~~ B. Tourism (1) Initiate construction of the Blue Ridge Parkway Interpretive Center. (2) Add at least one new major special event andlor expand the scope of those already in place. (3) Continue to promote and support expansion of Explore Park. (4) Consider potential uses of Virginia Mountain Country. 2. Increase Employee Efficiency and Satisfaction A. Develop measurable objectives for departments through the budget process, and for employees through the new performance evaluation system. B. Conduct an Employee Opinion Survey. C. Conduct a Citizen Survey. D. Monitor projects currently under construction ensuring timely completion within budget. 3. Cooperation A. Schools (1) Meet regularly with School Board and staff to discuss issues concerning funding and construction of school capital projects. (2) Pursue joint opportunities with Parks and Recreation. (3) Continue staff interaction and cooperation on operational issues, such as payroll, finance, purchasing, MIS, etc. B. Support regional efforts such as Project Impact and the stormwater master plan and consider establishing a regional authority for stormwater management. C. Expand the customer base of the Spring Hollow water system. D. Propose regionalization of municipal solid waste collection by the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority, and creation of Regional authority for stormwater Management.. 4. Quality of Life A. Support Parks and Recreation projects including Merriman Park, a lighted soccer field in North County, and regional projects with other Roanoke Valley governments. B. Support greenways throughout the Roanoke Valley, and specifically the Roanoke River Parkway section through Green Hill Park. C. Community Plan (1) Adopt zoning ordinance changes to implement Community Plan recommendations such as cluster housing, and ridgetop protection. D. Transportation corridors (1) Promote a regional approach to support for I-81 widening and the proposed I-73. (2) Utilize the Special Use Permit process to determine the best zoning February 9, 1999 03 school divisions have adopted models very much like one they are proposing. She asked that the Board authorize the School Board to employ a firm that would actually develop the plan with all the ordinances, formulas and policy language, with the intention of instituting the plan by January 1, 2000. Dr. Gordon and Mr. Irvin responded to questions from the supervisors regarding pending legislation in the General Assembly which could affect any early retirement proposal. It was the consensus of the Board that action should be delayed until after the General Assembly has completed their work. Supervisor Nickens suggested that a work session be scheduled to gain additional information and to further refine the focus of the proposal. Supervisor Harrison advised that he would not be voting for the final plan because he could be eligible for the plan if it is postponed for a year. There was Board consensus to schedule a work session at the March 9, 1999 Board meeting with the School Board. 3. Reconsideration of second reading of ordinance to rezone 11 93 acres from AG-3 to AR and to obtain a Special Use Permit to allow a 9-hole Qolf course to be located at the 2600 block of Rutrouah Road in the Vinton Magisterial District upon the petition of Randall Wayne Brown A-020999-2 Supervisor Nickens advised that at the January 26, 1999 meeting the Board voted unanimously to deny the petition of Mr. Brown to allow a golf course. He advised February 9, 1999 105 Mr. Hodge introduced Charles Lemon, owner of property, Palmer Bland, I Plastics One, Ron Martin, architect for Plastics One, Pete Haislip, Director of Parks & Recreation, and Dr. Gordon. He advised that this transaction involves the exchange of properties between Plastics One and the County to make their properties contiguous to properties each already owns Although the School Board actually owns the property, it cannot dispose of it. They must declare the property surplus and the Board must have a first and second reading to dispose of it. The School Board acquired the property in 1992 for construction of a new south county high school on the Merriman property, but with the understanding that if the School Board did not build a new high school, the property could be used for recreational purposes. The County has already acquired property to provide an access road to this property, He provided pictures of what the properties look like now and how they would look after the exchange, and advised that the County can get a $187,000 recreational access fund. This exchange will provide a park in South County which has a serious shortage of playing fields. In response to Supervisor Nickens, Mr. Obenshain advised that the School Board would declare the property surplus at their next meeting and asked for approval of the first reading to move forward. Mr. Hodge advised that on Attachment D, the agreement between the County and School Board, the following change should be made: (1) first page, last paragraph, change "grant" to "consider"; (2) first page, last paragraph, delete "or other physical needs of the school system"; and (3) on Page 2, replace "that Roanoke County will make available a similar location in Southwest Roanoke County on property owned by Roanoke County or property owned by the School Board," with "if it becomes necessary to have a February 9, 1999 ~ 07 NAYS: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Johnson Supervisor Minnix moved to approve the first reading and set the second reading and public hearing for February 23, 1999. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Johnson NAYS: Supervisor Nickens 2. Ordinance to_vacate a 20-foot sanitary sewer easement recorded in Deed Book 20 Paae 89, Section 12, Carriage Homes of Canterbury Park and a portion of a 20 foot sanitary sewer easement recorded in Book 15 Page 110, Section 9, Kensington of Canterbury Park lot 18A, (Tax Map No 86 01 10 18) and located in Windsor Hills Magisterial District Arnold Covey Community Development Director) Mr. Covey advised that the petitioners, Boone, Boone and Loeb, Inc. and Palm Hermitage Corporation, are the current owners of Lot 18A, Section 12, Carriage Homes of Canterbury Park, and have requested that the Board vacate these easements to allow construction of a proposed dwelling on Lot 18A. The County Utility Department has determined that the vacation of these easements will not affect the operation and maintenance or the existing sanitary sewer system. He asked that the first reading be approved and set the second reading and public hearing for February 23, 1999. There was no discussion. in the Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance. Supervisor Nickens asked for more details before the second reading regarding what the renovations will cover, both inside and outside, including the roof. Supervisor Johnson advised that he would not support approval of the first reading because he thinks the building will be used primarily for storage, and it is too expensive. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the first reading and set the second reading for February 23, 1999. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens NAYS: Supervisor Johnson IN RE: SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Second reading of ordinance authorizing the acquisition of real estate for the Carvin Creek Hazard Mitigation Project to reduce the number of structures in the Carvin Creek Floodplain lGeorae Simpson Assistant Director of Community Development) 0-020999-3 Mr. Simpson advised that no changes have been made since the first reading of the ordinance. There was no discussion and no citizens present to speak on this issue. Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson February 9, 1999 38.11-1-31, 32 63 Orlando Avenue Sharon G. Doyle 38.11-1-33 71 Orlando Avenue Dale L. Louderback 38.11-1-53 5352 Palm Valley Rd. Richard C. Moore 38.11-1-54 5346 Palm Valley Rd. Daniel R. & Kathy O. Otey 38.11-1-55 5340 Palm Valley Rd. Richard B. & Joyce H. Spencer 38.11-1-56 5336 Palm Valley Rd. Vestia P. Jr. & Patricia Black 2. That the consideration for each property acquisition shall not exceed a value to be determined by an independent fair market value appraisal; and 3. That the consideration for each real estate acquisition shall be paid from the Garvin Creek Hazard Mitigation Project Grant funds; not to exceed and subject to the amount of funds available; and 4. That in order to accomplish the provisions of this Grant and ordinance, the Board hereby adopts by reference the "Garvin Creek Acquisition Policy," which establishes the procedures and requirements by which acquisition of all real estate shall be accomplished. The Board may amend this policy from time to time by resolution; and 5. That the Board hereby appropriates the sum of $516,075.00, the federal share of this Grant, and the sum of $37,500.00, the state share of this Grant, to implement this Project. Funds for the County share of this Grant, and administrative costs, are available and appropriated in the Drainage Account. 6. That the County Administrator, or any Assistant County Administrator, is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish these acquisitions, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ?. Second reading of ordinance to vacate, quitclaim and release the major portion of a 15' sanitary sewer easements across property o_f Cave Snrina Baptist Church located in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District (Arnold Covey Director of Community February 9, 1999 113 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject real estate (portion of sanitary sewer easement) is hereby declared to be surplus and the nature of the interest in real estate renders it unavailable for other public uses; and, 3. That, subject to the following conditions, the major portion of the 15' sanitary sewer easement across property of Cave Spring Baptist Church located on Brambleton Avenue (Route #221) in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District of Roanoke County, cross-hatched and extending from Point A to Point B on the `Plat Showing Portion of Existing 15' Sanitary Sewer Easement To Be Vacated Across Tax Parcel 86.12-3-2', dated November 30, 1998, prepared by Shanks Associates, P.C., a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, be, and hereby is, vacated; and, 4. That, as a condition to the adoption of this ordinance, Cave Spring Baptist Church shall be responsible for all costs and expenses associated herewith, including but not limited to, surveys, publication, and recordation of documents; and, 5. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish this vacation, quit- claim and release, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None IN RE: APPOINTMENTS 1. Task Force for Senior and Physically Challenged Citizens Supervisor Nickens suggested that if other members are unable to make nominations, he would like the opportunity to do so. Supervisor Minnix advised that he would like to discuss this later with Supervisor Nickens. IN RE: CONSENT AGENDA R-020999-5; R-029099-5 a Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the Consent Resolution. The motion _ February 9, 1999 ,r~ ~ RESOLUTION 020999-5.a REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF LONGRIDGE DRIVE AND LONGRIDGE CIRCLE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM. WHEREAS, the streets described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(A), fully incorporated herein by reference, are shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, and WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised this Board the streets meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(A) to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, orders that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote Moved By: Supervisor Johnson Seconded By: None Repuired Yeas: Supervisors McNamara Minnix Harrison Nickens Johnson Nays: None IN RE: REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS There was Board consensus to schedule the following work sessions for the March 9, 1999 meeting: (1) with School Board on early retirement proposal and (2) concerning Virginia Department of Transportation widening of Interstate 81. IN RE: REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS February 9, 1999 5. Reuort on amendments to the Procurement Ordinance 6. Statement of Treasurer's Accountability per investments and portfolio policy as of anuary 31, 1999 IN RE: REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS Supervisor Minnix• (1) He asked Mr. Obenshain to arrange a time for Mr. Mahoney, Arnold Covey and himself to meet with a citizen about the title to property that the citizen believes is being erroneously claimed by the County. (2) He asked Terry Harrington if he had checked on the maintenance vehicle parked on Poplar and Martinell. Mr. Harrington responded that the enforcement letters had gone out. Supervisor Harrison• (1) He advised that he took an informal tour of the additions and bunkrooms at the Fort Lewis Fire & Rescue building and asked for an update on whether the project is completed. Supervisor Johnson advised that he had reviewed the renovations in his district and asked that the report on the bunkroom additions also show the retainage figures. (2) He advised of his concern about R&L Carriers and that Mr. Hodge sent a memorandum to the Board members about the problems with the intersection of Daughterty Road and Route 11/460. He reminded the Board members that this is an important issue. Supervisor McNamara• (1) He advised that on February 18, 1999, at 7:00 p.m., the Interstate 73 Regional Network is holding a meeting at Cave Spring Junior High School. February 9, 1999 119 IN RE: CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION R-020999-6 At 6:40 p.m., Supervisor Johnson moved to return to open session; that the Executive Session was held from 5:30 p.m. until 6:40 p.m.; that the School Board members left the session at 6:25 p.m.; and adopt the Certification Resolution. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Minnix RESOLUTION 020999-6 CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each member's knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting to which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Certification Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Minnix A-030999-8. a ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ._.~-""' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMII~IISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 9, 1999 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Canterbury Park, Section 11 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Developers of Canterbury Park, Section 11, Boone, Boone, and Loeb, Inc., have requested that Roanoke County accept the Deed conveying the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the subdivision along with all necessary easements. The water and sewer facilities are installed, as shown on plans prepared by Lumsden Associates entitled Canterbury Park, Section 11, which are on file in the Community Development Department. The water and sanitary sewer facility construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County on June 5, 1996. FISCAL IMPACT: The value of the water and sanitary sewer construction is $24,000 and $15,000 respectively. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the Canterbury Park, Section 11 subdivision along with all necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities. -~-~ " SUBMITTED BY: Gary Robertson, P Utility Director APPROVED: ~~~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE No Yes Absent Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L Johnson to approve Johnson _ x Denied () Harrison _ _ x Received () McNamara- x Referred () Minnix - x To () Nickens - x cc: File Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development --/~' c~o~~r RETURN TO: ROANOKE COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE THIS CHATTEL DEED, made this 15th day of ~S ptember , 19 _ 82, by and between: Boone, Boone & Loeb, Inc. , a Virginia corporation, hereinafter referred to as the "Developer," party of the first part; and the BOARD OF .SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGIlVIA, its successors or assigns, hereinafter referred to as the "Board," party of the second part. WITNESSETH: THAT FOR AND INCONSIDERATION of the mutual benefits accruing to the parties, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Developer does hereby GRANT, CONVEY, ASSIGN AND TRANSFER, with the covenants of GENERAL WARRANTY OF TITLE, in fee simple unto the Board all water andJor sewer lines, valves, fittings, laterals, connections, storage facilities, sources of water supply, pumps, manholes and any and all other equipment and appurtenances thereunto belonging, in and to the water and/or sewer systems in the streets, avenues, public utility, easement areas, water and sewer easement areas that have been or may hereafter be installed by the Developer, along with the right to perpetually use and occupy the easements in which the same maybe located, all of which is more particularly shown, described and designated as follows, to wit; Page 1 of 4 :, ,~' As shown on the plan entitled Canterbury Park, Section 11 , made by Lumsden Associates and on file in the Roanoke County Community Development Department. The Developer does hereby covenant and warrant that it will be responsible for the proper installation and construction of the said water and/or sewer systems including repair of surface areas affected by settlement of utility trenches for a period of one (1) year after date of acceptance by the Board and will perform any necessary repairs at its cost. Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby joins in the execution of this instrument to signify the acceptance of this conveyance pursuant to Resolution No. adapted by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, on the day of , 19 Page 2 of 4 ~ i Developer: By: As: State of: Vir 'nia County/City of: ~o~oke , to wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this: ~_, day of Q~~~l~Z 19 ~~ , By: Jack ~..oeb. Jr. Its President Duly authorized officer Title on behalf of Boone. Boone & ~.oebtlnc. My Commission expires: ~~2----- Page 3 of 4 i ~ WITNESS THE FOLLOWING signatures and seals: ~ ~, Approved as to form: County Attorney State of: CountylCity of: Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia By: (SEAL) Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Virginia Roanoke , to wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this: day of 19 , by Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator, on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. Notary Pubiic My Commission expires: Page 4 of 4 ' 9~'+s SOR @rN ~ n WN® i6G1 t - ~ '('% t „ o . i i _ _ [ / ~ C1Ei t CaNTER'D ~ LL ' OL 4 .. g /r 4 j CJ>rd~E'F3VFjY " ~~ `. g '90 PARK a ,., '•.. y fart ~ 3. cc ooh co., m '.:~Q _ COGONI< ~ a, 'R tc GL r 9Q ~. ° oU? ro P ~' s ~ _ ~U ~RF ~ `~ ~g r• - fi ta a° t ° ~. - 9. '~ y' x~ ~ 5 Rp ? ,^ A~j ¢ X54 L ~' yy, g v ~Q- y O ; ~ ~ P , , OP ri4' opyE RD j a ~~r G 9o PKE Carl` ~ 3 W 155 r^w ~, yeti ^b --PO ~-Itt:kFiFS.DS ~~ ai . FF EDN ` ? 6,%. '~j~~~ O ..s ~. , iac ~~ tiEl~j_ r,W-AL'. y.. ~' F ~'•i9' 2 y PD ~ : ~M/GHFIF(ps RD =C~ai (~~~ ...... o:o 0 2P ~NCLl ~ ph < e $ ag ROSCEP`r'F Q~F i h . F w~i'c{~''r.'+S~RCL_.. , ca~ PO$E(~ ~ "Y N..S ~tr filfa(~~Jv~ c... 4~F~ wK oN R $ ~ ?~r ElUC1[>~ A ~a ~ o~ " ~ ~ ` r i 'o ~d .t . M 689.. w ' ,,,. ~ ~ ` ~ W F ~ ~ f~'S0 ~ ~ ~ rZJ 4°' .~I CINI T Y . !'t' ss i '/' ~ NIAP a~r , ~, ~~ ,,! _ ,~~ " nt ,4 ~~ / W h~ ~'~/~ //~W'0 I 4. ,e tM~ ~j ,'.! I d .: •, /~i a ~~ / 1 r . n ~ '/ r is ~\ ~y. ,~ , ~ir -~- r NV ` .R ,yb ~-~, I ,y -_~ ai'~p ~ ~~ s _` i ~ ~ 5p , t, ENEe,;r ' \ %~55'f1'71 ~_ ~ ~ 1 w i i ~~ ~' f 3 ~ GO Gu~MaNwO[4 _~ ~ G , i ~ ~~ 50.7 J ,- ~ ~ i~~or Ss;E. ' .cP J /~ c 9 i30 ' v -1 ~/ s 5 3i.5J ~ .rl i• ' r \ lal is .r IA t ~ ~f ~ ~ ~O CI i 90001 LJ. 5E: "%'e •4 ~p^v lEo°.: RY PIGI ~9 a as ~ TONE ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ 40 ~ 3Y ~~\ 1/ \ m /.j A ~~ n ; /.p/ '4f~,~ ~J ~ ~ ,y ~~ P / G s . o, ~ , C ~ G C ~ a . 9. > _ " ~. , ~„~ , ~ s _: a ac a ~--- - ~ / s ar ,_ SALISBURY -°------- ~ ' ~ I('~~ 5„~ o -.ia, ,}~ ,lJ iii ~ r i f7 s) --N.-~- --_-9^~ e~ ~_. .ice r re ~7 ~, ~j~i'l~V _. - ~~s' ~ ~ . h , .1 ~ ~ S' _ _ I/// ~! 15 J ILr 1i ~~5.0 f ___ ~ ~ 1 ,C^ j 4G'SS a 5" s ~ ~ C) SSMU g _ I -a ---- --- 'I i y7.so.0 ~ 6a.c]oo ~.~ .~~" i a 3t nre.' i "f•~<:E zsr~. i ~•.:;, ~ m ~ -_ ___ I t o . oaf _ .0 J ~ ~M 75 • 'JO 9 0 a ~r~ i I (' 1 ~' S 3.'/9] 1 I r e 15 0~ G 0:0.:7 i F /, ~ ' 0 r5• 1 7 • ,7 I 1 T tin+~ LW/557U9J 1~5';(u5 ~~ ~ J ~ / i \~ ~7 t0 ~ r~~ ~'~ "! I y (a r~~ _ ~\ , J _ ~% ,w O 55MN „0 '0 t w:w! :.7. X10 r ~.ev '. ~9ww' R \~, ! / _ •f5' F``',_ a: e u \c~ t T'.r m 1,\~\~\~,~ ~,. . :\~) ~~f i F l Ew r w ~~J ~: r G. f O r 5T _ . s:i G .a. 1 ]c7'-45.04 ~ , J •r7 J L~, W/ 5 S7./p ROANOKE COUNTY UTILITY DEPARTMENT CANTERBURY PARK - SECTION 11 WATER & SEWER ~6.~7 A-030999-8.b ACTION NO. ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 9, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: ACCEPTANCE OF DONATION OF DRAINAGE EASEMENTS TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS IN CONNECTION WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF EDGEMONT OF VINTON, SECTION 2, P.B. 18, PG. 171, LOCATED IN THE VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: These consent agenda items involve acceptance of the following easements conveyed to the Board of Supervisors for storm drainage purposes in connection with the development of Edgemont of Vinton ,Section 2, in the Vinton Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke: a) Donation of a new 7.5' drainage easement, located on Lot 5, Block 3, Section 2, Edgemont (P.B. 18, PG. 171) from Charles E. Jones, Jr. & Deborah C. Jones, to Roanoke County Board of Supervisors as shown on a plat prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C., dated January 26, 1999, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. b) Donation of a new 15' drainage easement, located on Parcel A-1 of Greystoke Partnership Subdivision (D.B. 1450, PG. 1138) from George P. Stone and Linda C. Stone, to Roanoke County Board of Supervisors as shown on a plat prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C., dated July 15, 1998, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B. ,1,-'~ c) Donation of a new 7.5' drainage easement, located on Lot 4, Block 3, Section 1, Section 1, Edgemont, P.B. 16, PG. 141, from Samuel A. and Patricia G. Lilly, to Roanoke County Board of Supervisors as shown on a plat prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C., dated July 15, 1998, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Department of Community Development staff recommends acceptance of these easements. ITTED BY: ,,~-. Arnold Covey, irector Department of Community D velopment APPROVED BY: ~~~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE No Yes Absent Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson to approve Johnson _ x Denied () Harrison _ _ x Received () McNamara- x _ Referred () Minnix _ x To () Nickens _ x pc: Vickie L. Huffman, Assistant County Attorney File Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development 2 Post-4t° Fax Note 7671 oa+e ~ pages To Fro Co' Go. u r' ' Phone # Phone M ,/"-}/, ~ 3 Fax p !'~ 8 ~- Fflx # 1 CURVE DATA FOR 2-3: RADIUS +• 22.50' 1J=NGTH - 4.85' DELTA = 11'51'11' EXI EXIST, ~- ~J ~` Jv o;~ 15\ ~~~` _ _~_ _ MBt ? \ BLOCK 3. SECTION No. 1 'EDGEMONT OF VINTON' (P.B. 1B, PG. 41) ~ ~ `\ ~_ ~ ~ a Q W LOT 4 ;~ ~ ~m r~ 2 •~' PROPOSED 7.5' DRAINAGE EASEMENT y BY SEPARATE DEED PROPOSED 15' DRAINAGE EASEMENT BY SEPARATE DEED PARCEL A-1 ~I GREYSTOKE PARTNERSHIP SUBDIVISION L (D.B. 1450, PG. 1138) X0.1+ ,~1 c#G~ ~- 9 YG. ~~4 f ~\ '~ 5 ,n \~ _ ~ PROPERTY OF ~ CHARLES E. JONES. JR. do DEBORAH C. JONES ~ D.B. 1603. PG. 1781 ~~ ~ ~~ .~, 4 `~~'~. ~ ~'~ NEW 7.5" ~~~ DRAINAGE ~ EASEMENT 1-O T 6 ~~~ ~ ~~ BLOCK 3, SECTION No. 2 B ~/ "EpGE110NT DF VINTON` ~`s + E (P_B. 18, PG. 171) NOTE: 1) THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED WITHDUT THE BFSIEFlT OF A CURRENT TITLE REPORT AND THERE MAY EXIST ENCUMBRANCES WHICH AFFECT THE PROPERTY NOT SHOWN HEREON. PLAT SHOWING _.~"~~±+~., NEW 7.5' DRAINAGE EASEMENT ~" " f LOCATED oN ' ~~Q~~Q~ ~ LOT 5, BLOCK 3, SECTION 2 VINCENT K Z ~~ EDGEMONT (P. B. iB PG. 171) No. 14289 BEING DEDICATED B7 CHARLES E. JONES, JR. & ~ ,~e~~ DEBORAH C. JONES TO ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS VINT'ON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA SCALE: 1" ~ 50' DATE: 26 JANUARY i 999 LUMSDEN ASSOCI S, P. C. ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS CANNERS ROANOKE, VIRGI A EXHIBIT "A" ugn NEW 15' DRAINAGE EA SEMENT LINE BEARING DISTANCE 1-2 554'21'54"W 15.54 2-3 N50'44' 27.98 3-4 N39'15'52"E 15.00 4-1 g50• 'O8"E 3202 ' ~'=3 No' 1 ~ 28~ OF ~pT ~~ 9 QG M~~R~N~ ~~~ , •SP BLOCK 3, SECTION No. 1 "EDGEMONT OF VINTON" (P.B. i6,. PG. 41) LOT 1 i ~ LOT 2 OR,~H Opp r 3 vim- 1 ~ OD"W 1 526 9y ~'AR ~ a <4r ' E ~ ? B 1 6 : ~ ~~ r 4 ~ ~ rl EDGEMONT OF NTON 3 I (P.B. 18, PG. 171) ~ " o ~~ ~ ~ ~~ I 7is¢•~ ~~- ~ I ~0r 2 204.58 ~ ~~ ` E ASEMENT DRAINAGE I ~ ` ~ l~Y SEPARATE DEED ~ PARCEL A -1 '~ e '' ^' w ~ . NGEW 15' 2 DRAINA E EASEMENT 4 3 ~ ~+ ~~ ~ y~~. `~ ~? ~~ .~ ~~` ~ ~ N~ ' k4~~' ~ ~ ~ y w p o ~• ~p •.• °o PROPERTY OF . a' GREYSTOKE PARTNERSHIP TAX N0. 61.01-01-02 D.B. 1280, PG. 573 NOTE: 1) THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A CURRENT TITLE REPORT AND THERE MAY EXIST ENCUMBRANCES WHICH AFFECT THE PROPERTY NOT SHOWN HEREON. PLAT SHOWING NEW 15' DRAINAGE EASEMENT PARCEL A-1 LOCATED ON OF GREYSTOKE PARTNERSHIP SUBDIVISION (D. B. 1450, PG. 1138) BEING DEDICATED BY GEORGE P. STONE AND LINDA C. STONE TO ;OANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT RQANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA SCALE: 1" = 80' DATE: 15 JULY 1998 LUMSDEN ASSOCIATES, P. C. ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS-PLANNERS ROANOKE, VIRGINIA NE 7.5' DRAINAGE EA S ENT UNE BEARING DISTANi~ 1-2 N54'21'54`E 7.77 2-3 S5O'44'OB'E 49.68 3-4 N74'49'48'E 18.37 CH 4-1 N5044'08'W 34.91 CURVE DATA FOR 3-4: RADIUS = 22.50' LENGTH = 18.92' DELTA = 48'11'25" # ~~ Z Q l~~~E~~G GRd Ex~ V~ ~'~. I ST \ ~/~ ,. o EX IIS ~. 15 ' \ . ~~ T. ~ ~~\ U E\ '/ BLOCK 3, SECTION No. 1 ' M ~\ ~ O "EDGEMONT OF ViNTON" 6 L~~ \ ~~~~ (P.B. 16, PG. 41) (EX~gT~ 15 p,E,t \, f P.9 1 FG. 4 \ PROPERTY OF ' `~, \ SAMUEL A. do PATRIgA G. LH.1.Y ' \ BLOCK 3, SECTION No. 2 LOT 3 ~" \ "EDGEMONT OF VINTON" R ! o \, (P.B. 18, PG. 171) ~ ~. ~o ~ LOT 5 \\ \ NEW 7.' ~ ~ ~. ~ DRAINAGE EASEMENT ~ l' ~`~l ~'~, \ PROPOSED 15' DRAINAGE EASEMENT ~ \ PROPOSED 7.5' BY SEPARATE DEED 9~rS' DRAINAGE EASEMENT 2 \ ~\ \ BY SEPARATE DEED j \\~\ \ '\~ PARCEL A-1 GREYST ~D.B 1450EPG.1P138) DIVISION ' J~ Ar 54~~ `v ~¢ £ NOTE: 1) THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED 1MTHOUT THE BENEFlT OF A CURRENT TITLE REPORT AND THERE MAY E!(IST ENCUMBRANCES WHICH AFFECT THE PROPERTY NOT SHOWN HEREON. ~TIi O~+ ~ ~ PLAT SHOWING -~ r~ NEW 7. ~ DRAINAGE EASEMENT 7/$/~ ~ VINCENT K. x LOCATED ON ~LU~ M~D,~N ~ LOT 4, BLOCK 3, SECTION. 1 No. 1 BEI EDGEMONT (P. B. 16 PG. 41) ~ BEING DEDICATED BY ~~ sc,>~~' SAMUEL A. & PATRICIA G. LILLY TO ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA SCALE: 1" = 50' DATE: 15 JULY 1998 LUMSDEN ASSOCIATES, P. C. ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS-PLANNERS ROANOKE, VIRGINIA EXHIBIT "B" NEW 15' DRAINAGE EASEMENT LINE BEARING DISTANCE 1-2 S54'21'54"W 15.54 2-3 N50'44'~"w 27.58 3-4 N39'15'52"E 15.00 4-1 S50'44'08"E 32A2 No' 1' 2g~ G~~ 9 pG. crf~M , Q g. ME~~~N C~O~1F- „SpR ,-~"~ BLOCK 3, SEC110N No. 1 "EDGEMONT OF VINTON" --_.. (P.B. 16, PG. 41) ~ f LOT 1 LOT 2 ORq N OApS£0 r 3 W ~+ f f 9Y A~ ~8' LO ~ f BLOCK 3, SECTION No. 2 f S2661a "W ~'qRq~ ~~~T r 4 ~~ ~ r `EDGEMONT OF VINTON" 3 0 ~ ., f f (P.B. 18, PG. 171) 1 Q ~~ ~ ~7r~ ~a I f LOT C ~" `"`' f~ ~ S ~ h ` PROPOSED 7.5' y x 204.58 ff f `~ ` DRAINAGE EASEMENT i ~ ~ ~~ ~Y SEPARATE DEER 3 ~ ~~ L4 1 ~~~ T 6 PARCEL A-1 '' ~ N~W 15' 2 w ~ DRAINA E EASEMENT 4 3 ~, `~. ~~ ~~ ~ y> ~' ., ~~\ ~ ~~ ~~- .po r~ ,,, `o rP ~p '~ °o_ PROPERTY OF a' GREYSTOKE PARTNERSHIP TAX N0. 61.01-01-02 .. . NEW 7.5' DRAINAGE EASEMENT LINE BEARING DISTANCE 1-2 N54'21'54"E 7.77 2-3 g5p'~'08'E 49.66 3-4 N74'49'48"E 18.37 CH 4-1 N50 44'08"W 34.91 CURVE DATA FOR 3-4: RADIUS = 22.50' LENGTH = 18.92' DELTA = 48'11'25" -f' '~ Q `,~,~ /~ ~ ~ ,~g~ `,` ,~pe~ ~ 9 QG. ~ M~~\~R~G G 0 SQ \ \ sU/~, EX " i' \.\ \ ST \ /~ 1 ~ o,/ EXIT ~\5 P \ / BLOCK 3, SECTION No. 1 M B \. \ ~' O "EDGEMONT OF VINTON" • L~j \ (P.B. 16, PG. 41) PROPERTY ~ ' .~ \ SAMUEL A. do PATRICIA G. LILLY ~` BLOCK 3, SECTION No. 2 LOT 3 ~" rJ ~\~ "EDGEMONT OF VINTON" 4 4 ~ \.~ (P.B. 18. PG. 171) ~o to ~;' LOT 5 ~'~ \ NEW 7. ' ~ •~. ~ DRAINAGE EASEMENT 3 ~ ~ ~•~. ~'~ r~ PROPOSED 15' DRAINAGE EASEMENT 9j y . \ ~ PROPOSED 7.5' RY CGDARATC nrrn t r- t~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON MARCH 9, 1999. RESOLUTION 030999-8.c TO REQUEST THAT THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ADD INTO THE SECONDARY SYSTEM OF STATE HIGHWAYS A NEW PORTION OF ROUTE 929 (GARMAN ROAD) AND ABANDON THAT PORTION OF ROUTE 929 (GARMAN ROAD) WHICH NO LONGER SERVES THE PUBLIC NEED. WHEREAS, Route 929, refer to on attached form SR-5(A), has been altered and a new road has been constructed, and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County has provided with a sketch, depicting the addition and abandonment required in the secondary system of state highways as a result of this project, which sketch is attached hereto and hereby incorporated herein by reference, and WHEREAS, the new road serves the same citizens as that portion of old road identified by the project sketch to be abandoned and those segment no longer serve a public need, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add Route 929 (Garman Road), shown shaded on the sketch, to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to b33.1-229 of the Code of Virginia; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board abandons Route 929 (Garman Road length 0.18 miles) as part of the secondary system of state highways that portion of road identified by the sketch to be abandoned, pursuant to b33.1-155, Code of Virginia: BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote Moved By: Supervisor Johnson Seconded By: None Required Yeas: Supervisors McNamara Minnix. Nickens. Johnson Nays: None Absent: Supervisor Harrison A Copy Teste: ricer. ~. Q~,~.J Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Virginia Department of Transportation ROANOKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ROAD ACCEPTANCE & ABANDONMENT OF CARMAN ROAD 55.03 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ..L- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 9, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: RESOLUTION TO REQUEST THAT THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ADD INTO THE SECONDARY SYSTEM OF STATE HIGHWAYS A NEW PORTION OF ROUTE 929 (GARMAN ROAD) AND ABANDON A PORTION OF ROUTE 929 (GARMAN ROAD) WHICH NO LONGER SERVES THE PUBLIC NEED. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Virginia Department of Transportation is requesting that new portions of Route 929 (Garman Road) be added to the secondary system of state highways while certain existing portion of Routes 929 (Garman Road) be abandoned in order for the Commonwealth Transportation Board to update the mileage records. BACKGROUND: On January 28, 1997, Roanoke County funded the reconstruction of Garman Road to align with the intersection of Route 11/460 (West Main Street) and Allegheny Drive and the reconstruction/improvement of the private section of Garman Road south of the N&W railroad tracks. This project was for the benefit of improving the existing safety currents of the area and Kroger's construction of their new Vehicle Maintenance Facility and the expanding and remodeling of its Mid-Atlantic Distribution Facility in Roanoke County. Roanoke County and Kroger Company are requesting that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County add into the state secondary system of highways, as shown on the attached map (Exhibit "A"), the new section of Route 929 (Garman Road) and abandon a certain portion of old roadway because it no longer serves a public need per the application of Title 33.1, Article 11, Code of Virginia, 1950 (as amended), and most specifically the essential findings in the application of §33.1-155 Code of Virginia, 1950 (as amended) in the case of Hudson v. AMOCO, 152 F. Supp. 757 (E.D. Va. 1957), affirmed 253 F.2d 27(4th Cir. 1958). In this case, the court found that it was unnecessary for a determination of either public "interest" or "utility" to effect an abandonment or vacation of road. Rather, the essential elements were that (1) the road be altered; (2) a new road be constructed in lieu thereof; (3) the new road serve the same .r y citizens as the old road; and (4) that the approval of the Commonwealth Transportation Commissioner be obtained. Once this portion of road is abandoned, the property will be considered for conveyance by the County of Roanoke, per the requirements of Title 15.2-2274, Code of Virginia, 1950 (as amended). SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Roanoke County and Kroger Company is requesting the additions and abandonment, per the attached map (Exhibit "A"), of portions of Routes 929 (Garman Road) as a consequence of the relocation and construction of Route 929 (Garman Road). STAFF RECOMMENDATION: County staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve this reading of the Resolution to add the new portions of Route 929 (Garman Road), abandon that portion of Route 929 (Garman Road) which no longer serves a public need. MITTED BY: APPROVED BY: ~.~ '~ _ ~~. rnol Covey, Director Elmer C. Hodge of Community Developme County Administrator ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved () Motion by: Johnson _ _ _ Denied () Harrison _ _ _ Received () McNamara- Referred () Minnix _ _ _ To () Nickens _ _ pc: Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Tim Gubala, Director of Economic Development 2 . ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON MARCH 9, 1999. RESOLUTION to request that the Virginia Department of Transportation add into the secondary system of state highways a new portion of Route 929 (Garman Road) and abandon that portion of Route 929 (Garman Road) which no longer serves the public need. WHEREAS, Route 929, refer to on attached form SR-5(A), has been altered and a new road has been constructed, and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County has provided with a sketch, depicting the addition and abandonment required in the secondary system of state highways as a result of this project, which sketch is attached hereto and hereby incorporated herein by reference, and WHEREAS, the new road serves the same citizens as that portion of old road identified by the project sketch to be abandoned and those segment no longer serve a public need, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add Route 929 (Garman Road), shown shaded on the sketch, to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to 533.1-229 of the Code of Virginia; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board abandons Route 929 (Garman Road length 0.18 miles) as part of the secondary system of state highways that portion of road identified by the sketch to be abandoned, pursuant to 833.1-155, Code of Virginia: BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. E ~H I B I•T "~~" ' Se Map 55.09 1 100' PROPOSED ADDITION SHOWN IN GRAY DESCRIPTION: GARMAN ROAD LENGTH: (f) 0.21 mites RIGHT OF ii~AY: (1) 50/60 feet zanies PAVEMENT A'IDTH: (1) 36 feet SERVICE: {1) REPLACING EXISTING ROAD ROANOKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ROAD ACCEPTANCE & ABANDONMENT OF GARMAN ROAD 55.03 A-030999-8 . d ACTION NO. ~.~ ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 9, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: Donation of a 20' drainage easement and a new variable width drainage easement in Orchard Park, Section 2, by F. & W. Community Development Corporation to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: -P ~,"e SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This consent agenda item involves acceptance of the following easements conveyed to the Board of Supervisors for drainage purposes in Orchard Park, Section 2, Hollins Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke: a) Donation of a drainage easement twenty feet (20') in width, along the southerly boundary of Lots 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18, and a drainage easement of variable width on Lot 10, Orchard Park, Section 2, from F. & W. Community Development Corporation, as shown on a plat prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C., dated October 13, 1998, a copy of which is attached hereto. The location and dimensions of the easements have been reviewed and approved by the County's engineering staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of the easements. .~ 5 Respectfully submitted, ~\ ~~~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney ACTION Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson to approve cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney VOTE No Yes Absent Johnson _ x _ Harrison _ _ x McNamara_ x _ Minnix _ x _ Nickens x G:\ATTORNEI'\VLH\AGENDA\CONSENT\ORCHARD. RPT 12/07/1998 16:40 5407749328 F&W, INC. PAGE 02 ib'9d JZ 'fld „ xa~dd u~dH92-0, a'oN ND-19~y " JO Nd/0-2r~W n aP _~~ ~ 3 N nn n~,f /% 4'4~ Lr` ~" ~ c 4: R,~ ~ b d c _ c ~ o~ o ~ Z ~„ rn - z c~ ' ' ~a G, a i F, O ~ .-i U m w a w N o a ~~-+ ~ ~ ~ H z U cif O W [W >+ E+ VJ H O d W Q ~ Q ~ H [ ] ~ d p a M z N ° "' I w 0 a r o N H ~z z H w ~ ~ ¢ o a c ~ o ~ a a ~ ~ f- ` N ~ `~ a ~ " ° H w F ° o° x z ~' O i o a FL r {Y w O CQ w v F H Z (n ~' YT N ar ¢ '~ . f-• A W + C7 . D Z N D y~ Y ~ A Z A H ^ C7 [-+ ~ ~ ~ C7 OU O ~ ~ii = a - O ~ ,~ a U ~2 z H z O a O eo a. O ~ W ~ W H O L4 O ~ Pq O • ~ ~ ~'' c.~ H . U W U [L W f11 O A N z ~ ~ a o w ~ a .- ~Z ~ __ L7 ~• < W J Z a ~ ~ ~ ~ to N x Oq Z Z O ' h ~ .i N ~ ~ ~ ~~W N ~ c ~~ `~' ~r ~ a ~~ ~- `^~`` Q~ \ ~.m ~ ` w em ~ v ~ = 1 m QZ : I ; w _ ~ i i h Q a I d- , w v - 1 ~ I/ z ~ I m -- ~ F ~ w~ ~NSq i > /~Q - ~; y, - QZ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ N ' ' ( U ~ C, .. Q lL 1 t ~ v ~" J Q - ~ ~ N Q tt ~~; ~ I ~ ~ ~ Q v~ w _ V N N W O l ~ K` ~ = ti I z~ ~ -- ~---' ~ I ~~ w ~ oQ ~ Z a, ° I ~ I v~ ~ l~ ~ ~ ~ r ; e N ~ ~ ° ~. ~ a- / ~ _ / ~d ~ QN ~ ~ ~Q ~~:~ o ~~ / v ~ Qi C ~ ~ t~ 1 h 3 y~ ~ ~ a. •p w o C~ w a ,,, / k~`~\A~ ~' Q z a ~ ~ v~+• a z ' ~ ~ ? Q Z F F to G] U ~dcWf~ H Z `c3q~ w ,n o w"m ZHO ~~~,,: ~~~ APSON S Z AF6P. 'w rn m o..~ rn CgSN ~ Fti O ~ ~ v 7 ~~~Qi o~"'•~ ZEN~x Wc~HU ~~ao~o z~~iw~ iv. ~ 1~ Y ~"' Z • ~ ~~ M V ~ Z' .- ~ , ~ J ~~ , tiP~ ~~ A-030999-8 . e ACTION # ITEM NUMBER .L ~cp AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 9, 1999 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Summerfield, Section 7 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: d~~,~---~nw~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Developers of Summerfield, Section 7, Fralin & Waldron, Inc., have requested that Roanoke County accept the Deed conveying the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the Summerfield, Section 7 subdivision along with all necessary easements. The water and sewer facilities are installed, as shown on plans prepared by entitled ,dated , which are on file in the Community Development Department. The water and sanitary sewer facility construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County. FISCAL IMPACT: The value of the water and sanitary sewer construction is $12,200 and $11,000 respectively. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the Summerfield, Section 7 subdivision along with all necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities. SUBMITTED BY: Gary Robe son, P.E. Utility Director '!~ APPROVED: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE No Yes Absent Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L Johnson to approve Johnson _ x - Denied () Harrison _ _ x Received () McNamara- x Referred () Minnix _, x To () Nickens _ x _ cc: File Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development ~'~P RETURN TO: ROANOKE COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE THIS CHATTEL DEED, made this 21st day of January, 19 99 , by and between: Fralin & Waldron. Inc. , a Vir ing is corporation, hereinafter referred to as the "Developer," party of the first part; and the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, its s~wccessors or assigns, hereinafter referred to as the "Board," party of the second part. WITNESSETH: THAT FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual benefits accruing to the parties, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Developer does hereby GRANT, CONVEY, ASSIGN AND TRANSFER, with the covenants of GENERAL WARRANTY OF TITLE, in fee simple unto the Board all water and/or sewer lines, valves, fittings, laterals, connections, storage facilities, sources of water supply, pumps, manholes and any and all other equipment and appurtenances thereunto belonging, in and to the water and/or sewer systems in the streets, avenues, public utility, easement areas, water and sewer easement areas that have been or may hereafter be installed by the Developer, along with the right to perpetually use and occupy the easements in which the same maybe located, all of which is more particularly shown, described and designated as follows, to wit: Page 1 of 4 '~" As shown on the plan entitled Summerfield. Section VII made 3/19/97 and on file in the Roanoke County Engineering Department. The Developer does hereby covenant and warrant that it will be responsible for the proper installation and construction of the said water and/or sewer systems including repair of surface areas affected by settlement of utility trenches for a period of one (1) year after date of acceptance by the Board and will perform any necessary repairs at its cost. Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby joins in the execution of this instrument to signify the acceptance of this conveyance pursuant to Resolution No. adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, on the day of , 19 Page 2 of 4 ~' ~i WITNESS THE FOLLOWING signatures and seals: Developer: By: As: l itle State of: Virginia County o£ Roanoke , to wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this: r~[ ~~ ,day of C~ 19 ~_, By: (,~nclr~n cy ~ • ~ eld~rh o-,~se Its ~-~e.E .~~~ ~~N - Duly authorized officer Title on behalf of Notary My Commission expires: ot~s~se~~r;~~o, e.9 Z~ ~ : V r r ~ ~ r ~ a i :~ N P~ ~ ti' ~~~~._ n ~;~RG1.~_~~~G.`~ Page 3 of 4 ... .~ "'~~~ Approved as to form: Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia By: (SEAL) County Attorney Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator State of: Virginia County/City of: Roanoke , to wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this: day of 19 , by Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator, on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. Notary Public My Commission expires: Page 4 of 4 t ~' ~+e- n'^*.r4n l`xrJ Ro ~P P~f°F,pa~Q~. ' MOBILE HOMa ?+,S~O ~~ odt ~.-~.. ~~.00,s I +~ ~ QOc I FAR Q ~pyQ IQ~~•z N~c u~ L __~5 •. . t ~ p ~t(rt3t~5 -. _r E ,.i^ FS!Q .~°~d0e. ~'~ \: Cif N _.__ _ _ _ ~ ~qy, ^y, _ ~ A !" S' TRrSNSKRl7.~, ~l.~ B~'vNY~.u?. ~ M\r ~~ EB ~•O, '~ BLUE NfLLS GH $Jm ,,_ ~ a .' PK,,. ~ i, GOLF'CLUB HOUSE 4,~.9yiof ~~,~EP° 9Q 460 ~9'.Oyo • A(fYANC e gar `'' cP'•_ _ DISTRrBUTIONp O~~1seEi'x Ftw a~"~~-vL.l7NIl4L~. ~ ~~ CE TER -Gl~]`E ~ ,~F'p,`E' bgi(~E.II. m .. - ~ITRAMONO ~ '.,~ YJ~ ~~~~d R ~ i waeE6UGi~.~~~~~llfi' hll~s S~R ~~ p ^~r'•VNE CE E F.^a 1 P~~ (. ~' ~~ ~oMM~~,~;VI CINI T Y MAP A~r ~-~~,~ ~ ~- SEC 2 1 r SEC 2 SEC 1 s~ ~+p0_ ~: LOT 2 i i I I LOT 1 LOT 28 g f~;- _ - ~wm i i - a-------- i I _ --- - - - - - / 34 35 SEC 1~ lu~- i 33 SEC 1 LOT 34 ~ f SEC i LOT 33 ~ + T 30 ~ ' ~ 32 q _ SEC ! SJ ~ _ ~ - ----~ r ~ 31 LOT 31 : ~ --- 0 ~ SEC 2 ~'~ 30 SEC 1 LOT 30 I~ 110 / SEC97 'll 2 2 SEC LOT 15 LOT 29 LOT 5 ~ 3 LOT 14 I I LOT 4 /2g~10 2 \ 1 ~ r Yi \ 1 1 117 7 SEC 1 ' I ~ SEC 2 LOT 3 ' hh 108 i 131 ~ LOT 22 n' ""reP u.c y vT l SEC 7 ~ I ~ SEC 2 ~g -- --- -- -~---'~- `7 ~~ LOT 8 LOT IB ~ - --------- • ---- _ h -- -- •P. '/~ .e.", 112 "~ / I ~' ----~.------ I - ~ 118 SEC 7 2 SEC 2 LOT 2 `~ ' ""'~" ""` y/ I I 7 2 ~ i SEC LOT 21 ° tiny N 7 I SEC I /// LOT 17 ~ ~ ~ ,~h / I / ~ LOT 7 I 142 ~°?- 9EC 5 9 ~ ` 115 \ SEC 2 8~ / 113 s SEC 7 ^1/ p1"` "`" I I I ""`" I I..PI LOT 1 \ \ LOT 20 LOT 1 / '~ " h I 133 SEC 2 \ , \ $ a' c / / 1~ ti h S / !OB I EC 7 LOT 10 r \ ''+ z`r / ti ^/ L ~ ~' OT 8 I 141 SEC 5 \ e`' 114 6j I ~ g / / LOT 18 \ LOT 11 \ / I 134 2 ~ / / los \ SEC 7 l I SEC 19 ~ ,Lglj LOT 9 LOT ~ / I J 140 \ ~ 104 I _ SEC 5 135 \ ~ SEC 7 - LOT 10 ~` LOT 17 SEC 5 \ / / / ,,\ ~ LOT 12 l / ~ /~• ~ / ~ ~ \ \ , / ~a 139 138 / J4' ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ SE0 5 ' SEC 5 SEC 5 / Pp4 ~ ' LOT 10 `y LOT 18 ,LOT 13 ~8 / /~~ C S 137 ~-~ / 5 / SE DO LOT ~1' / 9 % ~ SEC / / 138 LOT 14 / / 101 /~'/ SEC 5 / / SEC 5 ~. j LOT !5 ~ / LOT 8 ~I ~ ~ / /' '~ . ~ -~ ~ 100 / ~ ' / ~ `~ SEC 5 ~ / ~~ ` LOT 7 / ~ ` ~ ` i ` ~ ROANOKE COUNTY UTILITY DEPARTMENT SU?~1?~IERFIELD SECTION 7 ACCEPTANCE OF WATER & SEWER FACILITIES ~~ ~ r ~/ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 9, 1999 RESOLUTION 030999-8.f AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO EXECUTE A COMPREHENSIVE STORM WATER DETENTION AGREEMENT WITH THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WHEREAS, the Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Transportation, requires localities to execute a Storm Water Detention Agreement in order to complete the acceptance of subdivision streets into the state secondary system of highways, if that subdivision has storm water detention facilities; and, WHEREAS, this Agreement is required by Section 2.1 (F) of the Virginia Department of Transportation Subdivision Street Requirements; and, WHEREAS, authorization of the Comprehensive Storm Water Detention Agreement will eliminate the need for the execution of individual agreements for individual subdivisions, thereby reducing paperwork and streamlining the approval and acceptance process. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia: 1. That, on behalf of the Board of Supervisors, the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute a Comprehensive Storm Water Detention Agreement with the Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Transportation, for the purpose of securing the acceptance of subdivision streets into the state secondary system, in accordance with the Virginia Department of Transportation Subdivision Street Requirements, which shall 1 ~e ~ be on a form approved by the County Attorney. The execution of a Comprehensive Storm Water Detention Agreement will function as a county-wide agreement, and eliminate the need for subsequent, individual subdivision agreements. 2. That this resolution shall be effective from and after the date of its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Harrison A COPY TESTE: ~• Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Virginia Department of Transportation 2 ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER ~ ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 9, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO EXECUTE A COMPREHENSIVE STORMWATER DETENTION AGREEMENT WITH THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~y~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) requires as a part of the acceptance of subdivision streets into the state secondary system, a Stormwater Detention Agreement for subdivisions that have stormwater detention facilities. Section 2.1 (F) of the Virginia Department of Transportation Subdivision Street Requirements requires an agreement from the local governing body absolving VDOT from all liability for stormwater detention/retention facilities that receive runoff from new subdivision streets. The Comprehensive Stormwater Detention Agreement is the same document as the Stormwater Detention Agreement that Roanoke County currently executes. The difference is that the Comprehensive Agreement is intended as a county- wide agreement to relieve the need for subsequent agreements. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff is requesting the Board of Supervisors to adopt the attached resolution because this helps reduce paperwork and streamline the process. 1 ~ .~ ~.~4 SU'f3MITTED BY: Alwe~'d Oovey, Director Department of Communi y Development ACTION Approved ()Motion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Copy: Paul Mahoney, County Attorney APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator VOTE No Yes Abs Harrison Johnson McNamara Minnix Nickens 2 .. z~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 9, 1999 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO EXECUTE A COMPREHENSIVE STORM WATER DETENTION AGREEMENT WITH THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WHEREAS, the Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Transportation, requires localities to execute a Storm Water Detention Agreement in order to complete the acceptance of subdivision streets into the state secondary system of highways, if that subdivision has storm water detention facilities; and, WHEREAS, this Agreement is required by Section 2.1 (F) of the Virginia Department of Transportation Subdivision Street Requirements; and, WHEREAS, authorization of the Comprehensive Storm Water Detention Agreement will eliminate the need for the execution of individual agreements for individual subdivisions, thereby reducing paperwork and streamlining the approval and acceptance process. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia: 1. That, on behalf of the Board of Supervisors, the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute a Comprehensive Storm Water Detention Agreement with the Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Transportation, for the purpose of securing the acceptance of subdivision streets into the state secondary system, in accordance with the Virginia Department of Transportation Subdivision Street Requirements, which shall be on a form approved by the County Attorney. The execution of a Comprehensive Storm Water Detention Agreement will function as a county-wide agreement, and eliminate the need for subsequent, individual subdivision agreements. 2. That this resolution shall be effective from and after the date of its adoption. G:\ATTORNEY\PMM\AGENDA\STORM WTR.RES ~IIII~-Ilililllillillllllllllllilllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllillll III 111111 IIIIIIIillllllllllllllilil IIIII1111111111111111111! ~- - ~~- • _ ~. _ L._.. AGENDA ITEM NO. ,,:,_ ~- APPE CE REQUEST .~ - ~. _ "' PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE V CITIZENS COMMENTS ,~ _ ,~ SUBJECT: - ..- _ =_ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the r = meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. x;r WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS = FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: :_. _ ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. , _ ^ Speaker will be limited to a presentation of their point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board, Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. _ ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments c with the clerk. _ ^ INDIVIDUALS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZED GROUP c SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK A UTHORIZATION FROM THE GROUP c ALLOWING THE INDIVIDUAL TO REPRESENT THEM. __ __ _ PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK s ~ a ~ ~ ~ s ~ i ~. i ~ '~ ~~ ~ - NAME r 1 ~1 ~ _ i ~ ~ - i ~ a ~ ~ ~ r ADDRESS PHONE ~)' mlllliliilllllliillllllllllillllllliillllililllllilllliilllllliilllllliilllllllillllililillllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllll~ 4 t'E"I'ITIOa `',~ ~~. iilz llilllc:'~1`Tllc;l I' ~ilic:lt~ ~~f ~~~ Illtj~~~1- ~ill~~. MCI L1V~C ~nl'lll~~ ~1C'~I~fc''lal !)1Si1-1~;~. uui ~al.:nr~. ~~t ~11li~ir~:1 artzn~iill~ Hi~1d~n `.~~il~y~ .~uui~~r Hi~~ll ~~il~~~.~1. Itcr~i~~ nc:ihun tllc IZUIIIli~k~~ L~11111f~ ~~~al'Q ~?f 1llT?Cl'\'lz~>I'S. il1C ~ II-?'1111 i~zna!?Illc;a( ~.)t Ti'1lltinl?Ct;ltl(~ll. atlli ThC ~~):Ill~~h~ l.'JllI1C\ ~~il~'~~I L>~~:11-Q r(lC Ihc1l' :l~~iSt111~~ :1110 ~~I~V~1Cc 121 .I~:~llii•lll`? :1 il-:1CiIC ~.~Illl'~~l ~~C\ ILA R=~ ~)c: IIl~t111v.1 1[ [~1C II1f::~~CL'flllll ~1~ I-~ICidza ~ 1~~c:A ~~ill?ll~ Q~)11C~ :111 C1 ;'.1C::i11~ iyi):1Q t ~;. 1,j`)1 ttl 1~~~1t1~~~= L~~IIt1R IIl C?~~t111JC RI II]C'~1~~~ Tl~aitlC 111 C1 lil :111 _~f~)i~t T~~ (ll~~I11~~t~ ~1[cfV ~~~1' I~1~ ~~11~~I1~:1 vt 1~1t'. ~lll~'~'1 1110 il]C:1111C1'~ ~~~ ~~1c II1CltUI~I11.`_' 7110~IC- C~-- _`~-' - ---- - _ - -- sue- -- - P~n~j ~~~r~>~,~5 - --~~~~~-.~c~_ ~r~ve_ -_712_-(~5/3 - --'_~ G?,~s~~- ! L~t1 %4[~ ~-_'_'~N~6f ~~~~~_L~YCC~u~3 C~~ - _.1!_T-.~~~~-- -~s ~ ~ ~9~ --- ~ ~ ~ ---- ---- X066 ~ ~ra.6ah+ --- l~{GD~o~vi ec~ - -- ~z~ I~15G_ .. ~~ o S'T~'V~3~N~/INGY-tN-- Ir74~`B~r,~~o2_ -17~-6~z~ ~oaoS _ '~Ll~ --- -- - ~iY~ S CG~_`~% _~ ~_~.~ ~-_~ ~Sf ~-~c_~ Ar_ ? 2(x_3 DC~,3 -- i~ - --- - - ~~~ - - -- ~~~~ -,~~- ~--~~°~-Iii-~~~~~- 7~~~-~ ~~~~ 3113 C~_ ~~ _. _~~45?~3 _ ~ilJ6mc~c~r.- 9P9 3~~ PETITIO~i ~t C- Ti1C llllClc.'.:'til__°11C:i 1'C~iC1Ca[~ ~~T ~~l indsor mils Ind L'1~-z Springy \i~ ~~lsicrtll D1STr1CTS. ::n~i j11r~:lis vt ~iliic~rz:l 1rtz:lciin~ 1-Ii~1~i~:1 ~ :lllcti Zulliur Hip:+l 5.:iloui_ hc:'~~~- pC:itiUll tllz R~)an~)kz C~xuln- &ru-d ~t Sunzr~-itii)rs..~ itC ~ ir~inla Dzpartlllani ~lt-Tr1ns~Uriaii~nl. and Tilz K~)111Ui~C (-.C)1liln `C:ill)~~I ]:'jl)lif4 tClr Ti1C:C 1tiSItiT1nC~ 1114 ~c::-\lCC 1I1 1CClllli"lIl° :1 Ti'IIl-11C ~Ullh-C~l t1C\ 1C~ TO ~1C II1tiTAl1C1 : [TI]C IIlICrS~CilOil ~)i Ti'7i1QQC:1 ~ 111~~- 5L:70(ll }ZC11C1 1IICi E-.1zcTric 1ZU1C1 f Rt. =i`~l ll] iZC1aIlUl\c L'ilunn ill rZSPU1IJC Ct) llll'rC1SC1 TI'1ifIC 111Q ;l] 1I1 Cff01'I TU pfC~lTll)fZ ~~.[Cn" fUl' TI]C ~i111Q1'C:1 Ji Tilc; ~Cilt!t~4 1110 I11C:11nC:'S alt [IlC I110C~~rI1L' ~7UDIIC. ` T ( ll L~ T n,, i, \~~_. _ ~ Il n f )z~n.r- -------- n r T~ - . - ,~~ L0- - --- - -- -- - / - ~~c - -- - "' ~l',(jf}drl~~iJ/,/~ Gv3 ~~~(~CY ~v-1~ ~i c~ ~~ ~-QV r~-- _ ~ ~ ~1~. Ol~~ e.,~ 36 ~~--~ 1.~-rs~ 6~1~ ~r ~ ~~S~f - ~ - -- -- _ - ~--fie-„`! ~-~~---- __27 l0 ~.icke.lieu A~V'~~ --34-~~-~ \~ owl.-__ _ Vi'e'-~~-~-, C9~~y ~Y ~~~~~~~ w I rir-v,~ ~n~, (COI ~~~v~1 ~1~ ~~• 9`~I-03~~ ti h ~./; .~ -~~~c T~j u ~{..,'~_ V~/c- C~/c5l,c.:~' I-`a /~c'~~ L..:e rCf E ~~ ~7•-~st` ~c?~?~o_ ~_ _ F~/ - _ a,~cJ _t ~ .mot `p ~ ~a a-)-, l~rc ~,, ~ E, ~+G ~ l~; -,r~c.~- /_~--• ' ~~7 - C.~'~ --- - ~ - , ~ ~ ~~--~ ~ -ors- 1 ` PETITIO~i r., \~-~- rilz uncicr~i~*llzl rc,ici~nr~ ~,t \l-inds~lr n:lls and L•a~c Sprln~ \la~~i~t:.rial DistrTCt. ::nCi ~ar~nr~ ~>t-ciliidrz:l art~:uiill~ HICICIC:1 ~-ail~t (uniuc' Hi~?il S.;iu~~~l. Ilc:'~J~ pz::nun ihz R~)an~,kz C~,ulln' BuaT-d ut Sunzr~•i~c)r~. ii1C ~-ir~ml:l 1~C7arit11C:1C ~,t•Tran~a~,rtatiC~u. and Tnz fZJ::IlUhC l-.l>llllr~ JC111,~~1 ~7U:11'd tC1C il1C:r :1tiS1tiia11C.~. 1[ld ~~.r~-1CC I11 1c:Ullll-III? :1 h-aItIC CCll1I1-Of dC~ic~ To be ill~tailcd at the iTlrzrti~:nun ~)t•Hiddzn ~•allz~~ Scao~lf Read :lnci F.iCCit-ic Ruad IRt. -1')1 in iZuanul:c L'~,unt, in r~spun~z nl lucr~a~zd tratiic and in an ~t-tort tc, pri,mur~ , ai~~ for tll~ ~i111QT-C:1 ~)r Tflci ~CIIU~'I :Iild ll1C:111~C:'s ~l{ tI1C 11100.1rI1L OLIDIIC. T~'~~t'`~- --- -- --~-- r ~,/tt.t~s.~.. 15 ~~~- - - -- --- . ~J_ 9~_ -1t - ~- D L7 i \' T 1: -11 \' ~ \ 1 L' ~ Tl R i~-L;'~r"r_. --------- D~~\ ~ - ~Io~ JYl:owUc.~) r~'Y ~/iGLJ~ .>h~ 5.33`7 ~i~,JA ~ ~5~0~6 ~~l` ~y5~ ~f~vS~c~N~ord~---- ~i r~ ~ r~ ~`~I.J /`M rw ~. ~ o iC~ y~ . a~ ~ ~,~'' 9~3 1 ~ SZ~7 I ` ~ 73 ~t N ~ d cS ~~. to~:n~ ~ Dom. ~ ~-`1 (o~~-`( p r• f C_~ u.1.0 P , ~ ~ ,~~~ - o Susou-~~l- i~ - _ 5s~/ ~ ~ t~U~ d,-~2~-1/_L~ R ~ ~.Yo~ ~~y__~?~ I~ QG~~ . (~ a S ~o z C~Pc~ ~ . _~o~~h ~a_rrP~ S7/~ .5~~,tiS .til.~~d6~1 ~ ~y-_ n ---- -- - i ` \ ~ ~ t \ ~ ~. 4 Mti/~ l , ".~.~~ . /~ ~ -> ~~~'~/I~/Gra ~ 'fly o ~ c~~L~.-~i ~4 ~, `I ~ ~ ~~' ~ _ ~,~,~Z~~, . fir. W -I~t~~w ~ t ~ ~ 5~.. ~'it~~-pcz;.gYY~c~Ac~~~,,.i °t~6c+ ~ (~ PETITION t~ C i '' ~L~?'% ------- v1'e, the tlndel'Slalled 1'eS1da11tS Ot \~1'llldsor Hills and Cave Spring 1~lagistzrial Dist~'icts, and parents of childran attending Hidden ~'alle~• Junior High School, hereby petition the Roanoke Counh~ Board of Supervisors. The ~%irgiuia Deparhiient of Transportation, and Tha Roanoke County School Board for tl3air assistance and service in acquiring a traffic control day ice to ba installed at the intersection of Hidden ~'allev School Road and Electric Road (Rt. X19) in Roanoke Cotuiri~ in response to increased h•affic and in an zff~>rt to promotz safeh~ for the childran of the school and members of the motoring public. Tiir\A~T ',\J 1 ~ -1 - --- ~ ~ ~ i~ ~~~ x ~~_ ~ 6.Z2o3 ~ ~ 3 ~ ~S!~ `I ,a-~ -~ ~ 2 ~- _( ~ -~ Shccw~ I lc° -?~~-- -- ~ L~ n~l~ ~r-e~ ~ v . ~o_ (~~~ a41 ' ~~~ SCI 3 /~- ~~ ~ - !~ i ~~ .8-v t ~ f ~~ ~ -- I ~ r a -- S (a~-s~~3_`~ I~ ~ ~sc~Afl,(~cX 20So~ %i,~~'~(~~ ~~' i o ~ w ~^ g - o~8~ ~ -- --- - ----- I .~S~e ~m I I ~ -15 T1.~1-~3-~`~'~ ~~~i4e~~ T 3~7 3Z5_~' ~ _ ~ ,~~ ~ ~ -- -- - - - ~ ~~w~ ~ ~3~ ~~ Q ?~ rn ~~i' ~ ~ i 7 7~~„~~3 / ,~~ //~~ ~oNN~ ~Ca4 ~ ~~g/y ~tc~~llo~ll --- - - ~v~ i ~--- ~ - -/(c2_L T`_ `_`- - ___-~- n ~~~~T -~ - Gw=.e.c~ ~ ~ > ~ % !''t ~ CAE ~ ~s<..~ PETITION ~j'e. the tutdersi~ned residents of\?~'indsor Hills and Cave Spring Magisterial Districts. and parents of children attending Hidden ~~allev Junior High School. herabv petition the Roanoke Coui~ri- Board of Supervisors. Tlie ~~irgiilia Deparhnant of Transportation, and The Roanoke Counri~ School Board for their assistance and service in acquiring a n-atiic control device to ba installed at the intersection of Hidden ~'allev School Road and Electric Road (Rt. X19) in Roanoke Couiiri in response to increased traffic and in an effort to promote saferi~ for the children of the school and members of the motoring public. _ ~ 11~ Cpl qb ~ ePa1 er ~ . ~ 77~- _ , ~a6t,r~ Ci. ~~aG~ ~ ~3SSC(tS~Ni~~ ~'. ''. ~ -1?7~~ -- - C ~ , 1~~~~~n ~~ _S~ -~, ~4~Z 3 ~, j q ~q- zaSa - --~- i _ l~ u__ Z ~. ~\~ e\1 ~~ ~ r` o ~, ~an i .~~t 1. ~t ~ e •~ ~_-_~a -' :.-~- -- i ~ _~rn~' Seri ~~~` ~~ cam' ~z31~ C~.r~ ~ ~ ct gGt ^a~o _ ~~ ~re~c_ ~R12.i2.1 S _ ' ~5~5 n ~ ~g~ _~~ __ ~~f~~ u ~ ' ~~e in cL(~ ~~ a- ~ ~ a~vZ~ /~o~ C~ ~1 o~lr~ : ~~~~~. ~~'~----- - ~h~' u ~l~C~ u i-'P~ 370 ~ ue rd~ ~ ~~~ -~ y~~~-~ !~J~cc-~-.a-L . ~h ~,cs~,~! 32~ S ~ ~ 7p7r~ - ~~ o~J ~ ~ e~tir4 L ~,~. G C (S 13/S.z -(, ~'/~le Sw 9y / '~7~ _ I ~`f•28 C~teen e4c~ow Kd ~~_(o`l~'~^ -- - ~ 59aZ9 ~Btzth ma_ ~ ~ ~ .~~ -- - - ~ --- ~- - -- --- ------ - -~~~-------1r~_~~_ _ - -- PE"I'ITION \~-e_ the undarsiRned re.~idents ~,t \1-indsor Hills and Ca~~e Spring \la~~istarial District. and parents ot~children attendins Hidden ~-alle~~ Junior High School_ hereb~~ petition the Roanoke Counh Board of Super~~i~or~. The ~-irainia Depat-tment ut~Tra~~~poriation, and The Roanoke Counrl~ Sehc,~,l ~3oard t~,r their assistance and ser~~icz in acyuirin« a h-atlic control deg ice to be installed at the intersection of~ Hidden ~-alle~~ School Read and ~-;lech-ic Road ~ Rt. -~19) iil Roanoke Counrt in respotlse to increased n-afticand~~in an et~fort to promote safet~~ for the children of the xchool and members of the motoring public. -~-I-ET:~i.-~i4'~R~---- --- ~-'R~-t~F-~ 13-~r:~-lam - _. ni~u_~,~,~ -- --- g#(3~~€- r ----- -~ ~' / ~`~ <iL ~ :ir^""• ri %~ '-!%r. U_ r~ V ~~ f ~ t'i _- 3 7 a~;~ L ~ try -- 9 5 - Ulu G y ~r r e. tom, ~ - 1_` ~_ v ~-- ~-~~ ~ ;b- jF i t`A=--- ~~ -~ ~~1,, ~ _.i J~)v\ ~~; 1;'~;~~` RS.r` ire ~I`,-~_F_~•~~- ~.. r t' - w -- - ,~~1~f ~!r /~wt'y~Vl.~.l~t~'yiF ~4?~.._ ~~ .....~~ f~f it C•~"S.{"t~^^ ~~ ~L`r ~`~-~ ~~±~_t~p .~. -- -- - -~--- --- _~ - __ _ ~ is _~[ _ - ~ - -- ,rte - ~_ ,~ ~, "".r'I' ~~ ~ ~~ ~= ~ i"~-. " ! " ,` U~ ~~ bra r~14..) is~ ?" _. - -fig- - - -- -- ~ - - --- f- -- - =~ ` ~ ''r=- -- ,.. ,. - ~-= t ` r-- - . /./_~y/~ //~_ ,``"E/Y'~_ ~~' t , y ,- t ~ t t , ` ~~- "` „i ~, -^i-r t ~ ~.,,, ~ , '~ r - - - +r `~ =r ~_ ~,/ f ,_... ~-_ - u- ~ PETITION ~Te. the 11ndel'fila2led 1'eSldelltS Ot ~~'lI1dSOr Hills and Cave Spring ?Magisterial Dist]'icts, and parents of children attending Hidden ~'allev Junior High School. herab~~ petitioli the Roanoke Coulih~ Board of Supervisors, The ~~irginia Depai-hnelit of Transportation, and The Roanoke Coulih~ School Board for Tlleir assistance and service in acquirilig a traffic conh'ol device to be installed at the intersection of Hidden ~'allev School Road and Eleeh'ic Road (Rt. X19) in Roanoke Coulih~ in response to increased traffic and in an eff~~rt to promote safeh' for the children of the school and members of the motoring public. ~-e ~ + ~ i u~~l ~ m eg (~l unta~ ~S~~tls 'C.QV eSpr; ng .(N,S u~ j `77y-o9o ~', ~- g---- ', ~ ~ ~ ~ -,, ~ 1~. 1111 r~n~ ~ c~ G,~-v~=~~c.,,,, ~ ~ ~ -U 4 r~F --- ~¢ ni 'I ~,• _ 1 , .., ~ ~". i]_ ~ , c 11 ~~ ~! 1 /~c l n n I ~(.~~~ /~'~n.,~.~i~oDD~~P.~L)`77 ~L-~~~; V~ ~1•}~~ ~x ~~ ~ ~ -- , r ! ~ (.; ~ _ j I .J ~ ~~ 4~ I ~~ j `01~ ~ a~6/ ~'n-~' f:~~ ~t°'~ ~ ~. Gt sliLera ~t` .~~_ 1 ~~~'~f'' / If j ,fir" g ~t~W~~r-~ .~~. ~1~#'4'~~ .~~D/1~ /~'r~~'~~r3` ~~ ~ r ri I ~~~`#~`j°~~ /~ i ~ ~4.. .~ ,..~n ii"-.1 ~ ` !`.. ~ 4~`~i ~~'S>..? . ~'h~:~"/'V Set s~ ey~ „'°"~ _ x r:~r' -. ,..>.. ! i~~ `" ~.f ~~ T ~-i-~ P~1~t,~_ Y~ - ~ir~~J ~) ~ (~ i ~ ` { "~ r ~ u~--y_C~~ ~, ~ r'-.:i,.,Z~ P ~ =-~ I ~ ~v ~v ~~~ ; ~~ ~ i _[.s_, ~ !1 .t ~' ~.~5rx_~~ + ~.,! L~`3r.~'~ ~ ~ .r:,~~D ~~."I~~~4.-rte; ~~., _ ~`~l~~f- 7 ~ i~ I -----~' lc.' I G~ ~~~//..R `-`" I `~_ ~~'~~~G~'`~ ~~ ~ i~'^."U L' ~ ! ;~,'~.1 ~~` FJ :~ }~l lf'"--- ! ~~Y%~O~ ---,, _ ..., ~, ~ ~;,,f ~ _ . - ,. ,' , l•J{ ~ """" ~ / ~ / ` ~ ,/ j + E, ~~f `. ,} ~^ ~ t t ~.~ YL ~. rye' ~ 7 J ~-i. ~ i t/y/R if ~,~f//`y ~~' ~. / ' ~. r~ PETITION ~~`e, the undersigned residents of Windsor Hills and Cave Spring l~~iagisterial Districts. and parents of children attending Hidden ~"alley Junior High School, hereby petition the Roanoke Counh~ Board of Supervisors. The ~~irginia Deparhnent of Transportation, and The Roanoke Counri~ School Board for their assistance and service in acquiring a trafre coiih•ol device to be installed at the intersection of Hidden Valley School Road and Elecri-ic Road (Rt. X19) in Roanoke Cotuih~ in response to increased traffic and in an effort to promote safeh~ for the children of ttie school and members of the motoring public. - ~ -- - ,/ i ~~'i~ 7~7 ~%',,.~ *~"'~'` i le rl.c~ rt-1'Yl ~-t, 2 ~-cc ~ ,. ~~ 3~ Y-2a ~ ? > y ~ =_ :> •~ - I~- _ ~ C' ~-/l ~ M i k ~ I S b'o ~t CoEe l~~ K ~ ~) ~`3 L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ -, ~~ mss rt ~ - -T -- ~~g,~,,,si, ~ Lc,r~. ~ S- fir. 20~ ~ Sam. ~Lr~ i ' °l g ~+- 53 82I _-- - - ~ er ~E ~-,n 1 385 _~~_hr~l ~ ~ ~ ~~qZ ~ ~_ ~ - -- -- -- Cl ~Z~~ ~r~ (~~ ~ z~-33~~ I i ~~ ' 'i -- --- -~-~-~-- so, - - ~ - - - -- -- --- --- i ~e(G R~1L- ~`'~:~ ;1054• s~..~-~•.c.,~ cn . , 1 al ~- - ~'r-~2-e.~~- 1371y F~~cP~ ~ r ~ .c~r2 _ IZ2(Q _~ ~qZ c~ _ ~ ~g~3~) ea.~. l 1~~ ! Z'~_~ ~ ~~ of _o~c I !l. o n .~ ~ ~ .~c-~+n o j ~~ .S~ G~ r s ~~-~ ~~.~A~~/~ 19 ~ ~- ~~ ~J- ~~.~.~.~ ~ ~ ~~iiv_ ~ ~~ ~ n,• _ X3503 ~,c~~! o~~ _ !'7~ao'1s0-: PE"I'ITION `~ Z. tilt lUldc:l-~1~IlZCi rzsidznts ~~t \~-itldsor Hills and C:av~ Spring \iagistzrial Disti•icis. alld p:ll':'nt< <~T cllildran att~ndiil~ Hidden \-ailc~' Jutlior High Schcx~l. 11c'r~h~• pztiti~>n thz Ruan.~kz C~nuih Board _,, '3upervi~c>rs. 'I'hz ~'irQinitt Dzparh»ztti of Tran~portatic~ti. and T'hz Rc~anuk~ Cuunt< Sclt~.,<,} I3uard t~,r ttizir a~sistaticz and szr~~icz in acyuirini7 a trallic c~,ntrul ,i~~ icz ro b~ imtalled at the int~rszction ut• Hiddzti ~•allz~' School R~tad anti i-;lech-ic Road (Ri. ~': `?1 in R~xu~~~~:z C:ounh in rz~pottsz to iucrea~ad traffic and in an ztTi~t-t tc~ pr~,tnute ,afzl~_ ~ ter tlt~ ~hildrzn ufthc school and m~mhzrs ~~f the motoring public. -- nn ` ~~ ,~. -- ~~/~!T/ L[d- T f~~B~/~l'D --- - -='-3''-'-~L~ EEi Gclc 4~~7_~ ~ • 5~~ - --=~-L-7 -Z'3.~ C7 - - - ~-~l~C..~__ _ _ ~ 7 7G . ~/ NCB-- -C.~~.~or~ Lu~K- ---~5 ~`lD _rl7er'Yi----,~-n-.~_._7_~5=~~~-- _ 7 -- - , --~--- -'1-:.-~-p----------- - v- ` ' IV`-~~ lK1l~X~a,-~ __~`~ l~'~ l~~ t \ ~~_~. ~,. 1 ~`(~I ~ ~vx_v ~ ~ ~~ C; Z-?`~' ~ a_`s p _ --- -- nr ~!~'_f? LySK ! y~ d' ~t 13~f~ ~~ ~f-c2 c~oa~ ?7~r -s ~ b'~ _ ~. `~~ ~ ~ ~- ,~ ~ Tti~t,~~ ~~~.~ ~ ~ ~~9~ ~~~~~~~~ ~ Irv- `~ 7 ~ ~~y - ~ '_ ~,,, ~ _ p ~~ ~ -.~~~G~s~ ~,_-~ ...` ~_ ~.~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ '~(& cF t Cam..: _~Ve e.- ~o\ - --- ci ~ ~ _ ~= ~ ~ 1 PETITION ~~ C- T~lz Llil(lc:'til_Q7.IC:~ ?-C~iC7C:]Tti ~~T ~~~ 111(1SOT- F-:115 117U L1~'Z 5Di-Illy ~~ `~!tifc:'1~ ~iSt]'1C:~. ::nu Pare:lTS (>t~~iliidrz:l 1rTCnciin~ Hi(idcn `~ ail~.~ ~uniur Hi~~] ~~ho~~i. I1zrCi~~ pC:itiun thz R~Ian~)kz L~~~unn B~)nrd ~t Suner~-i~clr~. I-i1C ~ irsinla Dz~:lrnnanT C1f L I-:111ti~C>t-i1T1C)11. :llld Tn~ ~~)111~)~C LCHIIl(1 JU:1O~'I ~IIIII-Q tC)C tt7C:r :1SSIST111CC '1114 ~~::-~ 1CC l17 1CCIllII-lll`_T :i Tf1tt1C CC)IITI-C)I SIC\1CC To be II1~T11Ic::1 :1[ TI1C i11rC:szCTic)n ~If~Hicide:l ~-1ilz~~ Sca~x)i R~rld :Illci ~'.1CL'T11C Ruad IRT- =1~)1 111 iZl)allll}~c Lt>(IIlT~ I11 f-CSPI)IISC T~) 1111I-C1~CQ R-;~t11C :111Q 111 117 CffC)I~T T(> pi't)ITII)(Z ~«TCIt' tUI- Tj1C ~:111QI'C:1 Jr Tllc ~Cllt'~'I :111Cj 111C:11hC:'S ~)~ f~1C i110f~1I'lll~ 01101tC. -~-tt-T-}:-~-r-c-- --- -- , _. ~~, ~ ---~-- - ~~~ , _ ~, ~ ---- > >t t-Y~-~i~* rr~ T, ~'a-~rrlr~-- - ~ r~ n u~;~-- ---------- ° U-rrr'~T. O Si'~!! a _ L~ _-. ~ ~ _ -70 ~~ -- ~ .~ ~- I o k ~ l 9 " a ~' - _ v - ---~--~ 3 ~yd' -- ~ ~ ~1~~ ~ ~~ - - j _ ~a - ~1~7~ ~l S~-- -~' Y - ~° ~ _ C c _ C ~ ~t-- PETITION ~~"e, the luldersi~lled residents of ~~'indsor Hills and Ca~~e Spring ~4agisterial Distl•iets. and parents of children attending Hiddell ~%alle~• Junior High School. hereby petition the Roanoke Cotulh• Board of Super~~isors. The ~'irgillia Deparhllent of Transportation, a11d The Roanoke County School Board f~~r tlleir assistance and ser~~ice in acquiring a traffic conh•ol de~~iee to be installed at the intersection of Hidden ~'alle~• School Road and Elech•ic Road (Rt. X19) in Roanoke Cowlty in response to increased traffic and in an effol-t to promote safet~~ for the cllildren of the SC11001 alld n1eln~el'S of the lllOtorlllg pub11C. r~, j1 >~~.~'~'~~t : ~ ~ ` ~ ~t~~r ~+ ~ fti.'S,~ ~~~~ ~~4i~ ~~~:^ k~'"., S.. -E-.,t,;,;;;',t!`'t l~;~ I ~,~ ~~.!~j; 'ti~t.7 , - . .. , , f~f - ~?~ - t , `'~ ~,~ ~T f . ~ ~" ~ > -- ~ ~~ ~..j is /1 ~; ~ `~,'~'~ ti~+4 r I ~ ~ '' •'~~A a~ {`~~,,.1--x.,.~» ! , ~~f/ ~ ~ ' ` ~. _-~, "`'u _~, ~ I ' „~ ,~~ ~ !/ ~ /~ ), ~'">ri.~.~--f i I ~0~0.1~t ~.~Er~t ~: 3'~3 ~UC~o~ri~t~l~c~ ~-'', _~~~r~_ ~ - -- - -iQY'0 VS~~~CQir Jc~lZ ttxv~ I ~ X'_~~.~~~-~ II I Y l ~ ~~ L CJ ~ 77~ ~~~ ,i G~. ~ y~ S ~ ~Z C~~ ~~---- ~~,~, (/U,~l~~c~w~ .! . e~~. ... ~a ~s Gc~i%~z~f~~ 776~b -, ~- - - T ~ ~....'~~::~ " _ ~ - - ~ ~ /^ fir` °~ ~~~ -' t __ i ,. ~ ~ _r r~~ 7 J I ~h~~~ ~., ~'~ .S ~ ~ 35~~ r~i _ red ~~/ya~~"~/ 7J !r-~~16 _ ~- _ ~~ `.~ ~~-~ c; I l •[ ~'~{ ~ / ~e.D ~~ ~J ~I ~-tdlf ~~`~~i'~~-,4 '! r~` I /t~ ~v~~~ .~ ~ ' ``~ ~ ~ '~~ ~ f I r~ ~~ ~~ ~ 1 ~ 1 1 j ~ 'l .~- ''~ _ _ r•- _ ~~F.fI~,~T~Gsf~ ~ ~ ~--- ~~ ~ ~ z y W ~~~ 1~' ~' ~.Lz.f= ~'t 1/,~ .. ~~/~°~~ , ~ ~__~I _~~~/-~ Lam'/, ~Tca "~ ~ I /rs~ lac ~ ~ L = `'74- ~'~i / 9., -- . - - - ~ -,--- ~" ~ ~ `~F ~ ~• ~rY ..~+lit.u - ~~--- - -- - ~~~Ite,Vfll~tt~f.~~F~/:~.~' - ;~,~r~~~`~/-is:.cCj,v"~4/tT t-- I,,,~~f'~~f,"7--= ~ d' / ~ PETITION `~ e. Tllz tllldc;l'S1?Iled residents ~~t~\~-indsor Hills and C'a~e Springy \Ia~~i~terial District. :uld parents c~i childran attending Hidden ~-alle~ ,iunior High School. herab~~ petition the Roanoke Couut~~ Board or Supar~~isors. The ~ ir~inia Deparnuent ot-Transportaiion, and The Roanoke County School F3oard for their assistance and sen~icz in acyuirin~ a scat-tic control deg ice to be installed at the intersection ot~ Hidden ~~alle~ School Road and Electric Road ! Rt. -tl~>) in R~~~inokz ~'~~unh in rzsponsz to incrza~zd tr~~c:uld in an etiort t~~ pro~n~~te ~afzt<~ for the cl~lren of the school and members of the tllotorin~ public. ~, -- ~ - J - ~l5~_~q~ f=a, 141_ g1~c~v~-~~ -~~?~Q34~ - - ~\ ~ c~a~\ ~v~,~ ~ ~~ c~Cs ~ ~ v~.~ ~ ; ~'~ ~vJc>ad t~C! '1 ~ 2 U'1,5 0 - ~ra.Q,"-~ (_e.~rY..~. ~~rG.\~ ~ ?-off CI~.,s~wt~ N1~....~Y._ ~ -~~5~ -- - --- ~Q f~ ~~,~ n L ~3L ~ro„~ w~ 1 ~f - 77y .~ z 3 f ~``~ ~"aG-~~- - ~ /i.~--- - 3~.~~- o~~.~-- Lac ~°~ ~- ~~-~.}} ~~ ,, ~~ z -?-~~~I c _ - _---_ ~ ; i "~' !,!~~ ~ ~a~, zs ~7~ Gr~,.N~; n h~aP Ex ~: 9$'q..7b'/a ----- /C~i~ i~~_^ ~- r--- ~~ ~yt" ~ ~ ~ r' ~t i ~~ ~ ~ ~ YE7'ITIQIV \~~z. ihz undcrsi~nzd retiidznts ot~\~-indsor Hills and ~:a~~e Sprins \lazistzrial I~istl'icts. and parents ofchildran attending Hidden ~-all~~' ,1u11ior High School. herzb\~ pztition thz Roan~~kz C'ounh Roard .~t-Super\~i~c>rs. 'I~llz ~-irQinia Dzpartluznt of Tran~portatioll. and 1'he R~lanuke Cuunt\ Schc~ul Board for tilzir assistancz and se1-\~ICZ In acyuirin~T a iraitic control deg icz to b~ installed at the ilitcrszction ot~ Hidden ~~allz\ School Read and I-;lactric Road (Rt. -t19) i~l Roanol:z C:ount\ in respontiz to increasad traffic and 111 :111 ettort to pra~mutz ~afzt\' tot' the children of the sch~?ol :old nlemhers of` thz motorine public. ~~~-r'~.~' ~-E-~R~--- - - -- -- in i-?.~r~ i3--`~'' .'-z `. ~~ -- a r~ n r~~,,.~,~r - ------ -- - -- -- . - 4z ~-A?~ - ~- ~ ~~o~ ~~L~o D~ ~. Z v~~ rn -- -- -- _- - - - -- - ~ ~fG,~- ~ ~~rr,~ ~G- r~tS ~~- - la.Q7¢ /~v ~ lam,/~ _ y8y__~~S_ ~ . _ .- ~----.._._ __ _.- tLt_~ - ~- - ~ ~'~ - -- ~!Lt..c-iv - -- - --- - ---- ----- - -- °~.~~ ~ ---- ;-~ 3 ~ 7 .S~..dw c~1v L 7-71 - Z 7 z ~'_ _Li~d,~. ~c~.P----- C~r-~c~~~cr~~re-l. ~S~J~ ~~1~rr;_nw~,,~d:__ 7~~~I-3~~. - -- - - - - - -, -- - _ ~- 1 ~ y ~.~~ - L ~3 - /~ /I1~4 ~~ -~ ,1 I '~ ~ Cam.. _ ~'~~'-ra7~ --~~ S ~,'~ ~' ~~-~ cti-,n-.,~ ~ <-t ~.Co~ Sa~trvv Esc c a < ~ ~ y - y t ~~ -- '---~~~ ~ ~ Coo C~o~_~.1~1_~~"6 ~ _. ~ ~r-l~ ' s ~ 3is ~ o w J ~~ ~ z~ o c-. f sw~3s S~~ c.. S~r,~~Iw~.c~ ~S9L ~rso~Lr. 772--RZSSF --- ~C~~~ S~i~ ~~~~ut ~c_ T ~~6 ~~ -3_~~~- PE"I'ITI01~ l~ z. ihz uncicrsi<~nzd rzsidznts ~~t «indsor Hills and ~;a~~ Springy \l:i~tstznal I3[strtcts. and parcntti ofcltildratt att~nditt~ Hidd;;n ~-all~~ Junior Hiolt School. Itzr~b~ pztition tltz Roanoke Coutth Roard ~>fSuper~•is(>rs. 'I~h~ ~~irainitt Dzparhnant ot-Tran~portatiott. anti Tha Roanoke Counh Schc+~~l I3uard t~~r their aaistancz and sere ice in ac(luiring a tr-ailic control de~icz to be imtalled at the i[tter~ection ~>fHiddett ~~alle~ School R~)ad and f;lectric Road (Rt. -t19) in Roanoke Count` in [-esponsz to increased traffic and in an et-ii)rt to pr~~[note satet~ ter the children ufthc schu~~l and members of•tlte motoring public. C~ ~~~~~~,~ r ~l ~j ZC j3,f/1ti a~ oG{ ~ ~ -- d /C. FI~~ ~''~..a'rz'~ -0 ~~z-~.JC~ f~a-.-utc..-Lv,,~{., Z4oy qi~' g- ? 3 Z }~~7~•en~ (.S~",,`~,,` Cr.~ic~~P•.W hecl~ev '3 `MZ~ C-~-s~-..f-!~v~, zt~atfr -----`?P~f'(oF/~ _ --- - ~~~~~ .~j3 -~--~- -- ._ .. II ~- M G~acl~ ---- - use.. ~~~~~_ _. ~---33a~1 (rte !~?~~ce 2y0~__~~~/~dDi~ __ ---- Iu_-` a c~. -- -- ---M ~ c __r~Q ~ .~_ Ire ~ t~enue_;z!~__~=~~ . ~'~ _J-~}~!`~ -------..._ ._ -.-_ ti'`f~R~~<w--IL/ T7~~~ jj~~.,a~~rrr~ cr~r z~`'1_.~7'~-f^~SZ7 S5~ ~.~ lv ~ 5~ ter- (~ ~ 1 ~-- `~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~~~ - __ 'r ----- -------------- ~~--.~,o~-~_.~3ro~~~.-s~'_~1a~.~_ . c~-x-d~ll~i~~~--may-may Two- - ----=T~~~~- `~~~ --cam !- --~~~- ~?a ~~1~__ '_ ~'v~ t c~-~,E L L N-i~i2~2i5 i ~-(~-1 ly (~~1t2~~ (~D~C'~ --~~~1- (oCQS~ l,U_ LYl~~_• _ a.+1s.~ _T . _! 13l L L_ ~-I f~- VZ f2 iS ---- --' `~ -`~~ ~~ I ~ wCDD ~__ °~ ~G - CdoSb r- _ - - - - 1 ~1 ~- -- --- -----~1I~~ ~e ec(-vl~----- - ! ~ 333 _~°(~'C~"r t~' - i~~ --- -- - - ~_7y -(o t g~{ ~~.n2 ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ q,vn n1~' 3~ ~ ~` i,. ~i~~ a~ . ~ ~ a - 3 z z5 ~ ~ y- ~ ~/ PETITIO~i ~~ ?" thz llnllc::'ti1~T11~:I 1'Z~1Cl~af~ ~)t `~ li]CjS~)r HIIIS :1110 La~2 `Dl"111 ~i:l`~iSCc:'1:1i DiSIT"]CtS" :ald ~al'~:1t~ ~>I ~1111t~r~:1 arfC:1C11IL HlllllC:1 ~ allc~' ~11111C)I" i'il_°_n ~CIIOI)i" hZT~J~" ~C:It1C)!1 till :Z11~111uhC L~)1I11C\' )3~1:11'd of SIIPCr\'iSUrS. .i-11C ~ tI"Q111121 DzparnilCat C)f I I"allti~urtarll)11. :lild Z'i1C K~)anuhz Luunt\ ~~;lc,~~i Guard tar th~:r a~sisranc~ and ~~:"~~icC IIl aCUUIi"lIl3 :1 tl"al•i1C ~l)nh-oi ~~~ icy to b~ 1I11ta~IC3 : t the intzrsz~tion ut~Hiddcn ~~ailz~' Scixx)i Rua~i and E.Icctl"lc Rua~i I Rt. 1'?~ in Ru.lnui:c L'.)unl~ in r~spull,z n) IncrCa,z:i tl-aitic and in an ~i~lort to pr~,murz ~a[C:~' tur tll~ ~~111QI"C:1 ~)r ills ~~il~~l+~ :I11C~ 111C:]111C:S ~)( the I11C)f~1rI1L' (111011C. ~ T~ 77 ~~ ~TT-~~ ((~~ i l ~ T 1'T 1: _Tl \' \ \ T L' ~ Il fl U~`SnS?- ----.----- D [I~T~ - ---~,~-~u~ ~_~,,~ 6~,1--~~1~~ J ~ ~_ 337 ~-~~a~ ~--Z~ - -- Il ~ ~~ e --- -------- - ~, ~~~ ~ ~. J l ~e~ --- ~la~ Cam..: n`~ ~' _-- ~ ~~~~a ~Q~ _ ~~9 -4~ ~ .~ r~ :~ S ~~-~~< ~~i~,,_ ~ ~ ~ Ili ~~~.~ ~.. ~~ %-~~~._3 _- -~ -, YE"I~I"I-IO~i `'~~ :_ `}]C 1117t1~1~1`_".1~C1 1'~~iClCllf~ ~.~( «I11C1.~~?i~ :-lll}S :1110 L11~ `~1'lll`' ~}:1`?l~ic]'la~ l~ltii7"1C:~. ;1110 naf'~11[~ ~~t ~I111C7I"c;Il 1I1~11C11I1~ HidClCll ~~ 1}}::\ ~11111C~I' !~1~_'1l 5l:illl(?}_ }1C1'~h\ O~Slill)il I}1;, i~u2111~~1~~ L~~Ullil RI~IIi~CI ~~1 ~lLj?ZI'V'l~uCS. }}1C ~ I1~_°illla '~~tJill~Til]dlll ~)t T1'112~i~~?ClilhUll. :iIiC~ T}lc hiYlll~~tiC L'Jllill~ ~L;l(~~ ~~ lx~:ll-Cj t(lf 1}111' 1~.nltiiIIllC~ 111C} ~:::'\"1C~ I17 .1LC}1111111`? :1 ii"Clt}1C ~~~IlIIY~I ~icv icy rc~ h~ in~tall~d ai the int~r~~cn(~n ~,1~ Hid~i~n ~•~ailzv~ S~h~,c~l R~ru1 :ulci 'r:i~ctri~ 1~~>ad ~ Rt. ~I~1) 111 h~~all~~}~C L~~1111R ill i'~ti~t1R5C Cis II1L:T~~:LtiCCj iI-1}t1C :111Cj Ill :111 =;~C7Ci ill i7f(~I11l~CZ ~:1}ACV ~ ~I_ (}lt_ ~1]t~Qt~a ~~( i}]~ ~~lh~(~} al1C} ll1cI11}~CI'~ ~~! (}l~ illOi~~Illl~ ~llh}iC- - - _ _ -- - -- -- ~-~ ~+-~_r_ris2~5_~ - - - -- --------- --- -- - - - ~-- - -- -~ a _j~- - ,D /n~2~1~2AiG~~ 17z~/~11zer~~.r_ 7Z~ -/5/3~--- 7~i -- - - - -- - /Yl~clt~~ i 1~ , l~ousl1 ------- ------ ---- - 77a~ga ~-_~~~J `333 ~/~<<_ ~. SGJ IG~ ~ZS=~~ -- J ~?~bt~~mBrFtx~N~r,_ _ 77(0-~~~-- ~n-, ~~,~~-(-~~rt. St7~; ~C~e~and.~~---- -r77N-~1/a3 ryn-~Sle~ >°!~/_/mar,-~/~- 7~Z6rj/ ~Q~ _S~c~~C1 as.~ i~r. a~a~~ Z~ao~?a- PE"I~I"TION \~ ~. the undersigned resident, ot~\\ indoor Hills and L'a~e Springy \Ia~~isterial I~ist~-ict~. and par:nrs ofchildreu attendiii~ Hidden ~~alle~~ iunior Ilish School. hereh~~ petition tha Roanoke Couui` F3oard of Supen~isors. "I~he ~-irginia Dapartmant of Transportation, and Tha Roanoke C;ouut` Schi~~,l I3uard t<~r their assistance and ser~~ice in ac~luirin« a traffic control deg ice to be installed at the intersection of Hidden V-alle~~ School Road and Electric Road (Rt. -i19) in Roanoke Counll in response to iucraased traffic and in an ef~iort to promote ~at~11 fur the children of the school and nleu~hars o1 the motoring public_ -~I-ET;ti~k'~~~I~l[L-- _.._ --$F~I~>i'~~~3~:4--~-E~- - ,»nn~~,~ - ----------- -- ~f--I~3?~-E~- - ~r~ a ~ ~ ~ a L ~ ~ c~ c~ ~ 5~5 ~ S `t ~ b C~. c`~s ~-,-c,~- -- ~ ~ ~ ~b3`~ ..~ - ~ -~ - - -- -- -_ _ i _ - J ~_ ~_ --- -- ~ I ~' .m~a,~(l __~lc~~ 13~-C//-+Cadls~ M.~(~t __~1~`~gg~ - ~~ .., -- - -- --- . --1~~'~-~- -~1- _ y?1a~t - ---- 3i Cr~`s~11'l.//~Cd _ 7eZ S-/d ~~ / ~ x(17. ~V ~'~~O Y'~ _.__ c~~.~ ~ ~-~G~/~c~2r ~__ c1~~1-ct' _T- ~ '. ~. ~ ~'l.~~fr1 G ~ _ ~~~d~ 7 C~+Gr ~ r~ ~r~S S ~f ~ ~~C'I ~~~_ --- -- --- -- -- ash _{~o ber~""s~ y57y wc~ ~-,~G ~~ f3V~- 9g9 -~aoc~ ~~~ U~~r~~- ~ ~ -- - - - ~- - -~~~ ~ _ }-)~~sv+-- - .~(_~ ex~-L~~ _ ~ 771 ~.~ ~ l ~ PETITION 1~"e, the ttndersigiied residents of ~~'indsor Hills and Cave Spring ~-lagisterial Districts, and parents of c}lildreii atteridinQ Hidden t%allev Junior High School, Ile1•eb~' petition the Roanoke Count~~ Board of Supervisors, The Virginia Deparhneut of Transportation, and The Koanoke Counh~ School Board t~~r their assistance and service in acquiring a traffic coiih•ol device to be installed at the intersection of Hidden ~'allev School Road and Electric Road (Rt. X19) in Roanoke Couritt~ in response to increased traffic and in an effort to promote safety for the children of the school and members of the motoring public. ,~.YY_..s ~f~[1J ~ ~d~~~. ~0~~5 ~ ~/~ 7 ~-a3~7'. ~--- --- ; ~ l~ ~r~n.>E 5e~u ~1 IaC i (03~? i~a_„~~h-r~~~ ~~',s'~ _~ _ __ I Cr~~ ~ ~ ~c RISE ~S .~-~-~,~J oo_~ C .,oc~ 77a -a~ Z~; _ ---r-- ~' ~i ~`C ~i I I , I t t d V t~t ' ../• ~• ,C3A/1~,3 0 v~-_ ~~ ~ I li.3o (i G,,rit,.s n ~ ,rA6./E~ S • a/ . 774 - ¢S58 ', ~ ~^ 5 i O~c~ ~OiJ ~(~~ M/~-C.~C-~2~ZZ- ~ .~flD !~-hccv~ IJr. S~.?~~-~o ~i ~ 5 %72 -~ Z `fS-I', -- ~ ~ F9 ~~~N . . w " 1 ~ _- ~~~a ,--~ 1n/~ ~~~2 ~~ - ~_ ~ a~+h S. 1~a hn ~ 6 C~lonia _~~ ~7~ _GP'tl i~ ~ ~ ~ '- lY~_-C~~-No ~ ,, -- -- --------. ~~~l.L ` ~ 2C/r ~-~~ t ~k1 - ~. ~L I / 1 1 1 UA~/l l~C - l,f9dlll_ ! ~ . 1~ {~ _ _ - ~ PauL ~alo~nson 15138Megdau/ C~eekDr.'T~9-3~5 - -- -~i~1~~ ~ 6 ~ ~ F1- t`2 5 _ ~ ~o~ Fee i r wC~`/ U ~ e w l ~' ~ ~~' S_~ / F~' ~ - Y_ wi S~x% 7N~ ~ ~~ n~a c~ ar~~_q_~~' i y" ~ , ~,, i PE"I'ITION 1'l"~. T)~z tlncf~rxi~iZZd ra,idz;st~ ~,r \l~ind~,.~r Hi?Is anti C,'a~~ Srrin~? ~iaLi,tzrial I)i~h°icts. ,lnd ~ar~nt4 ~-t'chi~dratl attClldill~ 1"ilcldc:Ii ~ all~\ .~112111~f' 1'1flQ11 S.:h(~tll. IiZrttl\' petflilUtl tl)v Rc>arn~kz C~~uith' R~~ard ut SLiPer\~i~,>r~. 1~lia ~ irginia Dapartniant ut 'rr°an~Pc~rtasic~n. and Ttiz R~~arn~l:e C;u-fnh Sch~+~~l E3uard t~~r thzir a~si~tancz and s~r~'icz ril ;lclluiring ;1 trailic c:untr~~l dc\ icz to h~ imtaiied :flt the ont~r~~ction ul'Hiddcn ~'all~\' Sciloctil R„ad anal }-;l~ctric I2csad (Rt. -119) in R~,;inul:~ ~'~~urlt\ in resp~~nti~ tt~ increa.zd traftic and rn an ~i~li~rt h, rr,~rnutz tiatCt\ tur tlt~ ..Itiidrzrl of the ~ch•.~~~i and m~rtih~rs .~t~ tha ntot~~riiie pcibiic. (LL/ I~,~''//~~'~~~/l ~!~.g1Z~3 -~ Qfi~?•l.~c~. - 1?v~.-vd~L~,,,4 2v~y? __ 41 a' g- 7 d3 t_ 1 `t ~ _ ~~y . W_--- - _ ._V!`a_tc'S.GId!_, lr.~ hCC~'2~ _._~tiFZV 4`~+-3~•J, ~v~, 'Lai F' -- ~~f'(~~/~ ~~~~'~c r b~e~~ ~Q~L~Q/cd~2u CrGe~~}/ `7 7 ~ ~ ~'~ ' sj3 - - -~ - -._ _ ___.~ ~- ~~c use. ___~_-_ ~s>~~ ~ ~.. _ __ 3~~ _~ } - '__~ -- ~ -.--_: _ .^r._--.. _._.~-- _ ~-!`~::~.i/.Ii~W~ _.._ ._7~~Z -f/'1~°Ci~r~r"0~ CI/_ `'f~7_ ~( "T ~.i Z I 9~A~!!«~., ---- ---~- -- - -- - --~r~i~t-..~c~dl'1cc~?'_'~ _~.~4.~ Coxc~c°_l~~~t~-- ~Zy - -~ n - --- -- ----- ~.~ L_ L t-li~Y~ S _~~~ 1_~_ ~V2~~ rLD~? C~ -- -g~~ - S7 _ ~----------^------ -- __---- ---- _-_~_T_-~_- --- -- - Q ..- ~ 5-_ --- -. _ - -- --- - b- -- ---- - - --- -_.._ ~._ .._ ------ -L.1r~_ ~(~eec.Cc,n~- ~_ _- ~3~'- ~(~-c~--ric. ~rl --- --- - _ ~~y-(et9y: ~~cn2+~ f rc~ (~~ ~ ~ ~C,rn rr~~+' 3~ 3o r- L. ate. ~ ? ~- 3'~,~ I PETITI~ti \i. _. Tj12 llllcl~:'titi'ilZtl t'Z.,3Clz:tt~ ~~t 1'~ iuds.~r Hiiis allc~ t:s~z ~prirta \l;i~~i,t~:-iai Dlstri~:~. ::tuf nar.:lt< <>t ~tlildrz:l :: t1Z:1C~121.~__` ~ltltlc:i `:~•:Ilz1' JzI11luY' Hl~+.i 5~."10~~1. li-~Y-z?~~ p~~ltluY~ tliz R~l.u~<:i:z ~~~u111C+ Beard ~T Suc?zr1'i~ur5. F.il~ ~ irs'.lllil Dz~arnli~:~t +l t~Tr:~ll~purtzrt~xr..llid Z'ii~ IZ~)arlJhz L~l41r111 Jl~lt~t+l ~'CY.1fd tc~r ttte:r ;1~ti15t~I?C~~i2d ~~::'~'iC~ 113 ;1Ltltllr'1I1`? ;: tl':ll~iC ~Ullil"t1{ JCS i~z to b~. irt~t~lll~d ,.lt rl~r ;lltzr:;zcslc~n ~ei• 1-iitidz:i ~~ailz~~ 5~:iuc~l R~'ald ;:rrci `r`.i~i:rZc: Ruatj ~ Ri. -1')1 ir3 R~~:lnui:c ~ti'liSlf, lii l'c`+(}tll1J~ tr3 iu~rzaszd iT: ttic :slid in ati ~tt«lt to pr~~ittiurz ,r,ir:~ tur thr ~!~llcir~li .lt`tit~ ,c!i~~~,; ;ll7d ili~:lti~r,s tit tllc nlur~~r;ri~~ public. --~ -- ~~,_ -_ ~~L~ ~~ ~~~ _~~ ~~. ~~ ~~ '' _ i ~._~~?6 _-ZZ~ ~~~_'/ ---~,-}~ua _~_~b_oyv_..~~._~V_-~_ 337' Lp~an~•---Z??=~- ___.._ PETITItJ~i Z~ z- thz und~:-~it~2lz:i r~~ld~:lr ~.t 11~indr,~)r ]-Iii:~ anu ~:i~z S{~rin~ \Ea~~itit~:°i;tl Dtstt-ic*;. :ulcf P:tr~:)ts ~~# ~iliidrz:l :lrt~:uiiu~ Flidd~:2 ~,':lllz~ Sul;iur kiivlt ~4fuwl_ h~:'~J~ n~:ttlvl2 tlta Rllilll~)kC' ~-t)1112t~ ~t%:11'd ~)t 5tlnt'r~'i~t>r~. I-ilc ` 1!'$21]1:1 1~iG'.7i1i7111c::11' ~1{ TI':ll2ti~l)rTarlUll. :lrl(f Talc' IZ.)Sllt)lod l.~ttltlR J~III)<<l I3U:1('tl tql~ thc:r _15.515Tai1CC :lilC ~t:::'\ ICC ItI :ICCllllrili`? a tT:ll~1C ::Uilll-C){ J~~ ic~ n~ l~~ in~tall~-.: sr tllc :tlt~rtizcrit)n ~>t' Hi:ldc:t ~~11I~~~ S~:l~~t)l R~ta~i arl~i Fizcrric: E~a~ad I Rt. =It)1 111 IZ~);2ilUl~c ~.t)ttltf~ Itt :'c:~~ltit'C rt, Ittcr~a,a<d tr:t[tlc :211d ,11 :111 ~rfi)P'I Tlt ~rt~113ltfZ ~:~ICft' tU!' tI1C c?tlldr~:l ~.tt r#te ,citt~t~i ::nd In~:llf~~rti t)t~ tits ulc)r~)rn~~ public. -"1'l~TTT-T~I['~--~ --- -- --~---- "°T~i~TTe 3~-,*-TR-~-- -~..~-~'~'VT~,-^7T- ----------..~.TU~4r----._ - - - ~-u~ ~ --- - ~~1~~ Kn CAS-- _ ~ .~-~ ~ ~1 ~, ~J _ _ 7 as -sv~ ~ _ __ ~~,- -~-- r" ~.- - - -~'e~ _ __ - 2~ to ~,K.1n~liear PrV'C• ___343 -~! 1 ~ ~1 _- __ a `t e d ~/ s ~ ~ D ,:~_~'~~ ti Lod ~ _ ~~C L'~-,'? ~'/ - ------- - ~ 1 a r~ ~cc nit L~~O I ' 1 r ~'t~. ~~1-v_3 ~ -- -- -~a.,~r,~... u l tom., ~ k ~ ~ _ _~~ ------ - - _~-~rHr~C~S ~%.yvE3 ~~~ 3 ~/N rPP~~+t..z~~ ~s'S ~ L~N,vHu; /Cllrr bx « ~inh~cc ~/'?c1~ lA~k~ar~r~l:y~.-% ~r. 7 `~ . ~ ~~ ~° ~. 98'9 0~9 ~ _ ~~? ~~ v ~f Y cj w'r .~. ~ :~fi _ 7 ~G_a-9a c PE7'ITIOIY \l z. ihz urnl~r~igl~~ci t•etiidznt~ ~,r•1~~;IZdSOr Hr!!s anti C.'a~~~ Sprilt~ \la~i.;tarial I~i~h-ict~. ~tr~d ,par::nt~ <~ft}tililrzlt:ttt~tycting Hidci~n ~-allcl ,Ttlniar High Sclu,c)!. l~zrzbl p~trtlun tl~~ R~,an~)!:~ Cc~utltl R~,ard _ai S,rpzrl~i•~?rs. "I-!iC \~irQinia Dzpurh~aaltt ~~t•'Tral~~pc~rtati~,If. and T'ha R~,an~:l;~ (_'uunh Scfu,~,l C3vard t<~r th~~r <r.xi~tancz and s~r~ icz in a~yisiril~g a tra}lic ctlntTUl dc. ire to b~ iti~taif~d at nc~ ilat~r4acn~,It ~~t Hiddzn ~'ailzl Sch~x,! R~7ud :inci }•',l~ctl'ic [Z.>ad il?t. ~+1`,~) in lt~,atx~l:~ C.'~~unt1 in rz~pc,citic tr> incr~a.zd traffic and ire an zt•}~a-i n> },r~~m~~t~ ~afz11' tJI' tl~4 cliildrzrl ~.>f flit ~cb~,r~l grid nlem t,~rs ~~f~ the Ixlc,k~rir~e public. d ~i t?c1 /+~D ~? Q - .,~ 3~ ~ KF~c~zcK 7£ ~ , _ -- ~_ 2 a --- - ----- " LS°v~~ ~a rn .~Ur~ 5mj~~ ~`~3s ~~ _ Uzi =~~ ~-s- ____-_- - - - --- _ ~ r- -. --- _- -- - - -..~ _ - _ ~_ ~ _ 7_`_h_~S ~ ~-_ - - -- - --__. - - - _- ----- - --- - _ -T---- _ _ ___. _.~t.11~~__._.t~.s~~ _ ---- Cir~c~_f~rCrL~re.l.___!-~~Jr__"~~1~.rr,nw~.r-,~d~ ~!'~~ 3~~ _____~_ _ r\ . -- -- - _----- - -- - --- - --- - - -- --- -- .-L~ ~ ~.. ___~~~~--raj - _ ...._ ._ ._ -~ ~? ~-- - - i --~-a•-~ ca„~n ~} c~(~ ~ S tV LW CJt~3SC C. `'t~. '7 Z -- _------ --------~-------_.._-___._- .------._ .____-Y_~V i ~+ t~ n ~s~ .- . sw N ...~~ _ V.c..t..LC.1.y..e.- __ ._..---..~= V" ~-----°'~- ~ 1 I a ~~ r ~ ` ~ `/411 -..----~,~(.L~ j ` . ~." _ _ __-- - S.c- 5~,~~l~iw.,.~ 3syz- ~.~so,.,L~ ~~z~~'Za`f --- n .l~d~._ ~~~~--.3~~~- C~ PETITIO~ti \'~ ~. rilz unci~r:;i~~ne;i rz,rcic:lr vt l~ ind~~)r hills ~nci ~.s~z Sp1•ills \1:IZl,r~rial D)smc*~. ::nll ~ar:::)t~ ~>t~~i)ildrzn ::nznliin_'licidc:l `,~:lli~~. Junior High >.:ho<~i. !tc:-zi.3. nc:iti~n tll~ i2~,:lil~li;~ t.'tnull~ Beard ~t Super~'1~c,r:;. i'ilc t'irsin.a Dzpurnt)ant ~It~Trall~purtanucl. and Ti)c 1ZJ111~11~~' <.~rinli\ ~~lUl~~l i~Ual'Q rUf fJlclr :lti,~Itiral)C~ 1110 ~~r'6'1C~ lll 1Cc4Crirlll_r 1 rl':lt'{IC ~t>1111'l,~1 Pict 1LZ r~, ac ill,tall~d 1r nc~ i1ltCrsc~ruln ~it~ Hiddz:l :-~llz~~ Sc.l~z~,l R~yaci :Inca ~:icc:rri~ Read c RI. =!')1 il) R~.lanc±kc t',lunt` in r~spurl,c r~> ?n~r~a,c1 'ratfrc :illy .11 ::11 ~t~:+i.lrr rcl pr~~rlclr~ ,a~cn tur tll~ ~:lirCil'C:1 pit 111ti ~cli.~~yl 11111 illc.11~9C:'ti ,)1 rl)C i)1C>C~ll'ill:.' rJllU~(C "~ , r"C- ._ _ .. __ ~ ~~'iTZT~'iTT ~ Ll ~~~_ _ ~ R Fl 19~'~Tt•Y~_ _.__~._ __-_ _. __ ~ u'TZ1",~.,..rC- _- `~ ~ fora ,~ ~~-tee.. 7 -~7 ___- - _ ~~._ __~~~ ~ --__ _____~_5~___.__7 j - ~~ - - - ~-~._~`'l~"~"• ~(~.{r~F ~ ~S(~ ;'z~rv,~~,c:~.~~~` ___- 7 ?-z-7c7.S~-i .__ _ .~.~ ~Jl + c k ~{ Q~U r ~re__~ G s L ~c.'.+-r , r~ ~0' - _ ~7 ~ Z ~ )u +~ `7` - ~ ~~ ~ - --- -- --- Steve- ' _r~ ~_~l/Y ~a~ ~_ _ 3 ~- ~yd'~ --- ._ ~ _ _~ ~ v ~~.- ~ ~. __ ~~-3~~ z - ~ ~~~? Purl'-Gn~t'~ r-~ trt 9n, ~ ..1~o ill ~? ~ ~ `" ~~ r~'o~- .. ~I ~ _ ~ SLiob ~r,o~ nit VA--- --~-~~°- ~~z; _. ~~ ~ - ___. _ ..~,~ ----- -~~~~~ ~~ ~~;.~ _ _ _ _ Gam= ~~~ ~.. YE7'ITION \'4-a. 1112 ~Incf2rsi~n2d r2~id2nt~ ~~t'\l~iudsor Hills and C::~r2 Spt•ing \ia~i~t21•ial l~i~trict~. anct parents c,t'childl•21t att2ndilyg Hi~id2at ~~alic` ,Tuniur 1-iigl~ School. h2a•Cbo• pztitu,n the Roan~,ka C'oirnh Rc~.1rc' _,~ ~iupzre~i•c-r•.~. "I'ltc ~'ireinirt f}2partltt2ttt ot~Traly~pc,rtatic~tl. aI><d The Kc~an~rkz C::~ultt` Scfl~~~~! i3~~ard t~~r tftzir a~sistanca attd Sar~•icr in :tctlllll"Iri'~ :t traillC control ~..i~~ irz 'o Liz i1l~talled clt the nttct°`2ctiott ut' HidCi2t1 ~'allz~• ScEtr.'«i R~>Ftd and }-;I2ch•ic Road (Rt. ;' `?1 in R~,.Invk2 (:Dunn in r2epolts2 to ittcr2a.zd traffic :InCi In aft 2t"ti,rt tc, pl'~,rT7ot2 ~afdte tur the ,h;ldrzn ~-~f the ~choul :tl~d I~tcnthars ~,f tlta moturin¢ public. t •~,, j~ ~ , ~~ ~ ~ 1, ~. t. l~.liJ}~ ~c ..___- _._ '!~l!~ Ir~t~...- _. _ _ _~~~!-~_~ktr~Q~l~s-.~~. ___ . _ -._~1.`'l" ~-~~ ~_ .. . 111 - ---- - _ ~bedN~-~=~~.~'~t-s,~- .' ~a7-rE huBd,4~~ _ ~;~~~.~f~sT~,,,~.,P~-_.._.r. _. .~?.-~!:_.~...sz~ - y32,3 ~_.--9_'~iGG_ .~~__.- 776 ^ SS~2 __ __ __ - -- . _- _ -_ _ ~. -~~ _~ a.~G _~- --- ' ~ ~7 to _C~zArt~._~ ~ _ . _~~ '1~1Q~1 ~.. -- --;~~ - -- -- e ~~' _ _- /,~ ~~--, Gam/ C' ~,3~ /~ ~) _ !~ . ~ -- - ~---, --- - --- ----. _.___._ _ __ __-__ C. ~ ~~ - ? ~ `~ ~iL ~~l G-t~ ~L ~ C'/' n~ ~ ~ F /- "7`'~` I ~ ~!l ,S ~ ~t~C_ -.L~`L _~~_~ J _ - - ---- __.._---~--- j __ _ _ -,~~~(~ 'mil i~~~ _L~ ~ ~~ -1~ t~ ~y . ____ _ . CQ.~_ .~ ~a-~-~•~--~- ___-4~s~«...,~~~~ ~°t8cp 6 C4~- Ede,,, Rol _ _`~~"+. oaa`~' PETITION Vl'e, the iltldel'slglled restdetits O# ~~4'indsor Hills and Cava Spring ?~Iagistarial Districts. and parents of children attending Hidden ~'alle~ Junior f~igh School. ltereb~~ petition the Roanoke Coiinh Board of Supervisors, The ~'irgiuia Deparhnettt of Transportation, and The Roanoke County School Board tier their a5sista~~ce and service in accluirittg a traffic cotth•ol device to ba installed at the itttersection of Hidden ~'alle~• Sch~~ol Road attd Elech•ic Road lKt. X19} itt Roanoke Cottnt<~ in response to increased traffic and in att a#fart to promote safety fur the children of the school and members ofthe motoring public. ------ tiDiA:TL`il AT A 1l1~ ~l~'c7ct -~----------- ~-TYYt.:7~-- ~~. ~~~~ ~E ~o Paz-~(--- --- ~y. ~ ,,,[ r, J~ "--.~?_t---: ~ - ~~?~~_~4Q7'' ---- '`~___-~I~~~ail.- -~1.~__._~~Z~-333` ~. re. YYl u,~ le,A,u~ ,'~~3~ ~~t~u.' '' ~ , ~, ---- -- --- - ---- i -- , ------ -- -:~- r_ ~ _ ~__ a - ~ ~_ -_ ~'~lA-~.~' ~__l [~ - !~_~~_, _ .~,~ ! ~ > i. sit ~ ~G __! - --- -- - V ~h ` ~ ~i ~OS4~ _ S,e~ v~ ~C.~K. Can . I ~l,`11. • ~ 4~V.'J~` ~_. ._ ~ _ s~., e I_~8~3-. .„ ~ • ----- --- r-^-- - -'---- I ~`f3 S7 G~ M s r~/h, ~~~~~ --T-- -- ------------ -- . -~3s ~ ~~ - ---T- ---- - -- --- ~~?~-3y7~ ~B~ Y~ l~ PE1'I'TION Vl'e, iha undersigsied rzsideiits of ~~'indsur Hills acid Cava Sp~•iug \4agisteriaP I3istricts, and parenta of children atteiidii~g Hidden ~'alle~• Juiiiur Higli Schc~oi. hereb~~ petition the Raanui:e Counh~ Board of Super~•iso:rs. The Virginia I7eparhnesat of Transpczrtation, and Thz Koanol`e Courih~ Schoo! Bua2•d tier their assistance a~:d service irl acquiring a h-at~c ciuihul device to be installed at the intersection of Hidden ~'alle~~ School Road and Elech•ic Rued (Rt. X19) iti Roanul:a Counh~ in response to iueraaszd trat'~ic and in aii eft~~rt to promote safeh~ for the childrz~~ of the school and rneznbers of the motoring public. F 1"C ~ ~ 1 me ~'lUn-f~~._---- --!.Still ~irveS~r~n _~N,Sv_±1- ~ "~7`I-o9o~ -- 7 --- - ~ i - - ---- ~~ ~ _ ,~ - 7 ~ ~ ~~~ c `1~ h ~r~ ~~, ~ - -'~ ~ ~ . /~ ~r~-~aw+ w ,~r .~~ T y~' q - 4`71'x` --- --', r .. - j, S sE- /~ /7 w p. ff~t _ r ~ ~ ~ r .. f N~ ~ ~ a -- r -- - - - 'T ~~ ' I i 3 I r ,. r , , fj^a4 ..- li ° ~ .a.i 3~ ~ ~„ a _-- ---- ~ ~~ „~, ~. ~ ~~ ~~, r . '~ r, ~~~..~~ A +~Ji - -fir-~. 4~J -~.~- -- - j ~@~~. r r I 7 d ~,~ , ---_ - - - _ _ r t F f 'i 1 ~ r' ~ i~ ( i . . S J~~ ~~hr /rte' i %~G ?,~~ ~ t''~ --t7rc~~T,~TiTaC -'------- PE7'I"1'IUN 4~ z, ihz uncEcr•~i~nzd r,.~i~lztlt~ ~~t~11'indtiur Hiii~ and C.'atit 5~rtn~ \(:t~i,taria] I~i~trict~. anti p,~r~nt~ c+t~clirldrerr :ttt~nding Hiddcrl ~ aifc~ .(ttnii:>r High ~4ftc,~,1. lit=rzb~ p~tttivn the Rc,7n.,ka C'~•tenh Bc,ar-:~ ~,t- St:per i~~~r5. I~hc ~ ~r~ir:ia Dapaa-httanr ,~6~ Tran~p~~rtatii,u. and T'h~ R~~att~>kc C'uunt, Schi~++l I3u:trci tur Ihzrr a~tii~tanc~ arld Sari icz itt :rcyuirin17 :r tr•at7ic c~,rrtrc~i ~~~ icc: to b~ in~tallcd at the intcr~zcti~7rt ~~f• Hidi{~tt l allay Scht,c~l Ri~rtc~f un~i f-;I.;ctric Rt~ad ~ Rt. •11`)) in R~~arr_~1:~ L'~.xutt` in rz~pcrn~~ t~~ irrcraa~~d n•at•tic :tract ir; an ~t•furt t~, (;r~,rzit~tz .atat~ fur the :.hrldr~;rt uf•tlta ,clt~.~~~1 :tnd ntambar~ ~,r tha m:,turin~ public ~~ ,; ,. ~`... r 77 ! ~.. --''~. rh----- .. _ _ -__ -- ~, .; • ~ ,{ ~ - <ifi.1 v j~ ~ .~ ,i .C' +~ -- G+ 54!'1 - Y r c p `~ ----- '~-3_~"~' r~t ~2~~ _ tr ~- 9 ~~1._ UG G y ~Du_~ ~et_.,%-__ Laid?- ~o~~~? C2 _C ~_~ -~"G9~r .~ . - __- -_ _! , 1 - y - _ _ ) , _ ~/ yam, ,~ ~. , rfi ~ -~~ ,~. { ~ ~ _~ ~ ~ t ,, ~ -' ~' r, __ ~. , •~ '!~'" ~ .,<~-S k ~ -~`~'' ._ ~_-- -~T ~-~ =~• . tiff:"'°°~ ~ c." `«. - --- - ----- _ _ A 4 ~ ~ ~, - - -- ', , ! ~ ~ -- r , ;~~ ,/ {/ 1 ,rt ~ A u , .. ~~r..:~ ~'•-. .., ,j ~..~a~' l.~' ~!f"~G--,7 J~~._ .~*' ~ (' L ~'~._ - __, P, f f r ~hr' ~r' j ~io t'.~°,~ _~ ~_~, _. /~'~f_ __..' .v f I '`/ ~. -- - - 1 i ~~ - ~ _ _-~ ~~• _ `-~-~~~-ice - - - . -- -- - . ., .. . ,; ,: J` p - , t t~~~~~~~ G , -- - _ _ ~' t. -~_ -- ~ ~ i1A ~ d A -_ -- -- -- -- ,~ { r' _ ,~,1. _ .- .. _ 1 r , P ~ r t ;1 ~ Icy r {/ _. _-.. ~_.... ..-~~-.__. ~.-- .- «.__-___._. f__~.. _.__- ~_ __ __-f__~_~. _-. ~ ---~I _. M w ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ -t PE7'IT'IaN V4'a. t11e uitdV~-siailzd ratidauts t}t~L~"indoor Hills and Ca~~e Sprin`J \l:b~sstarill Drstr~cts. and parents of childrell attending Hidden ~~alle~• Junior Hig11 Scllooi. herzbi petition the IZOanol:e C~t)titltl' Board Ut Sl1jJt'.rVl~ors. T11e ~ Iralnia Deparntizn~ of Trail4portation. and TIIz Roanoke Coz-nn' Scllool Board fir tkleir .lssistancz and service in acc{uiring a h-aftic control device to ba installed at the intersecriorl ofHiddeil ~'allee~ Schuoi Road and F_'lach-ic Road (Rt. -119) in Roanoke Coiulh iiI respuilsa to iiacrzaszd traffic and in an e#-#urt tc~ promt~ta safzt~ foi- tl~z children of tht. sclx~ol Ind mzillbars of the nloturine pub3ic. --~ r 71 ~- _T~-P_`L3v - -f 9$9-2196 '~' ~' _~~~.a,J. u ~ __.~ ~ a.C~ ~c~.-c~ a~ ~ ~ a ~t~r~~ d~ n c~~_~~_4 4 _~~~1 ~~~C,~...___ __ __.._ _ _~~'~. ~_~~~u~_ ~ 370 ~~c~~~ _--~~~-- _- - - -` - ------ r«il!<C ~- ~_ :_ ~ t s 13/S.~ -ei ~,~~ ~sw ~ 9~/ ~G(i70 - , ~rr~-~ ~ ~'~.u ~.u n~ h !, `X~8 Cyr ccr~ ea how 1~~' ! 77G -~ ~l ~'S"' -r---- PE"I'ITION ~'lt;, ih~ und~r~i~~ll~~i rz~i.i~3lt ~t.\~ il3dyi3r Hilly ~3nd ~'a~~ Snl'ill~~ \S;t~}I,tcrtal I)istl'ict~. alCt O:1rC3lt`. l~t`Cl131C~1'dil attZ3ldi3l~ HililjC3l V'~ilaa~ ~llillll3' Fii~h 5clll~ul. hc'.3'Ch~.~ ~Ztit7C~l1 Tl]C 2t~an.~F;c (.'t,lltlta F3t~arci <,t'~upz3-~i~t3r~:. l~h~: ~ irginia Dzpa3-illl~nt ~~t`Tra3l~nurtatic~tt.:lnci ~i~ll~ R~~tl17c~~iz ~.~l~U[lh SCllt~t~0 ~3u:ll'l~ tc~C i12~1f :1~:~1~tAllCZ :1t1C1 >zi'ViC~ fil :1Ct~l3ll!31~ ,i tf:11~1G ~t~lltfhl ~i~~ icy to l~~ Ill~talled at tll~ i3lt~r~~cti~~n ut` Hidd~:3l ~`aI1~~ SCh~~t~i R~3ac1 :lna l:l:.c;tric: R~lad ~ Ri. -~i')) Ill R1.)~lnul:~ tll137t~ ill ('Z~~t>tl`+Z tt) I1]11~Z~1~ZCl R',l~IC~:l31t{ S1l~:lll~ctt~)I-t its ~t't}1llt~tZ ~~1tCi~ t<~3' lll•_ cfiiTdr~il ut tllL ,cht,t~l ancf m~3llh~r~ ~~f tfl~ Inc~t~~t'in~ pltbiic. -~-I-(~i.-~'~~:-R-1~-- _ ---1(-'fi~1E'~:l~~:~?~-l-lE~~,''f~_ _-- _ . ... 1_-~ ._____~- _ /~ ! - - _ _.. _. ~ ~~.. __ - _ ~ `~-~ -Tnrvid 1. ~o S~ f~~e ~~~- ,dr _ 332~G1 -~1,~_~~- __ ~J~~iC4~c Lt3OC1~ ~Q PIE~()~h: X72- yy7y ~'1 Z tr75'~ ---- _ ------- ---- - ~sr -3~~`~~. t,~- t;}~onr,~E.f'~~~-~s-ti,, ,~3~1C'dR~~L~, g1~~'-St~~o -- - ---~- --- ~~~~- --- --~~~~~,__- ~Q~_~r~-~~~ -~__~_~-~,_~s~~~ ~ ~~ - - ------ I - - - - - ~ f ~~, ~' ~ ,, ., ~ ~)/_ y j~ r / ~~` ---+4s~~JS~_~ _ _. __ .._. ------- - --- -.. __ ~~'~L U. ~ ~'t, <7_~1. •4e_~..-3 Rj!/1~•_µ~ !fJ W Z•°.. t--/~'t-~'~"tei v'^~... ~-.. .....__~ ~'a. ~ ~ ~ ~L' _'." ` ` 1.~,.JC.C..~ t I ' C y j~ 1 `e~,,.._: 'wl ? a ~~ i ~ ~. ~/ i.~, ~C,. ,_ ,, ` ~r in.r ;I ~ 7 ~`!`~ ~ ~ / r ~._. ~. ... T / fir.. f/' ~~ _ ~ f+ / '~ _. . _---- _- - -__ __ ~---- -_ 1__ ~~ _ ;~'~ ___ . _ A ----~ _.cs - ~ - -- -- - _ ~ -- - ~ ~. _.C~ ! _.._ -_ __. _._ _. _.... Y ~I~a~.u~ ~~..x.~ PETITION ~'z, tl7a undarslgned rzstdants of Vl'itldsur Hills Ind Cave SpriFtg Magisterial Districts. sand parents of children atteliding Hiddeli t'alleti~ Juliiur Higli School, liereb~ petitiut~ tl7a Ruanol:e Coitntl' Board of Supervisors. Tha ~'irgiiyia Jaaparhnaltt of Transportatic7n, and Tha Roanc>ka Caul~t~ School Board tier their assistance and sarvice in acquiring a tragic conh•ol davice to be installed at the intarszetiun of Hiddzli ~'alle~• School Road alid G'laetrie Road (Rt. X19) in Itoanuka Cot!lth~ in response to inerzased trattee and in an ett~~rt to promote safety for t]!e cliildrzn of ilia school and membars of tha mo3oring public. '~ h. i =--~: _:~ _-r-$~3~k;- __ • i ' ~ !~ _- --- -- ---T _- ___ - - - - ----- -f ~ ~ ~ L{ ~~ -- - -- - -- -- _ .-_ - T__ __~_ ___-_ ~ i --- - - - --- __ tel: 1~~~2- ---_~ ~ ~ T --- _ ---- _ _ ±~!.c / T __Gw_..<,y i 6,_~ / 1'tit i-C~~~Tn,~,'1vP ! % _j.-~, _______ ~_ _. ~ --- - ----- ~ ---------.~_--- - ---- - I - -- --- 1'ETITIO?~ i'.-z. rhz unlic::tiigttzCi 2'~:~iclC;tt~ ~~t `l"intl~.)r t'li1lS 1lt:l L.':1:'C `; f;rtiia .~~;ld~l~tc:•1:11 DitiITSCt~. :uui p:lr~:lts ~,t'~hildren art~:tdill, Hilidcu ~•:ll'lct lultiur Hivit S~!)uUi• !tzi'eJ\" pcrlttun rhz Rt1I1DlJ~iC' C..ttltltt\' F3c):ll'(~ ~r ~(l~zr\•i~(rrs. i'ilc ~~ li'Q!lliil Dz~arnttzltt ~)t t I'::ll~~Urt:lrlUll. :Iill~ t 11C t'2,~):llli)~;C LClllI1R J~ItC)~r~ BU.irCi ti)r rllC:r :1 ~.tiltitlltC.::lltd ~C:\'1CC III ;CC:Ctlll['lIl`.? ;i C!";lt~lC L:)il(i'Cl! ~ic\ icz ro be in,rail~d .lr the illtCrtiCCn()ll ,.~t' Hidcizn ~"~ilz\' ~~ha;ii R.r,lli .:nci E;icLrric::t~ad c Rt. =I')1 ul R.,;llt~}i:c L",,unn in r:tin(kns~ r~~ ~ll(:r~a,cd fiattic :lita ill ;:n cif«rt t(, pry„rl~,rz >.st~n 'Ur tilt: ~:tfidl'z:2 ~,t ritL ~cltta~~ ;li1C~ i17C;11ilC:'~ ,t1 il1C ;IlUr~tfII1= ()tlbllC. . ~• _-- ,, _ . . _~ _L~' Gene tr~.~.C~--~~-?~"_! ~~tL_~~r ~f ,~r~h~ 533y L~i.~J~~ ~~'oid_ 4~-yS3_Z? _ ~~.~ u ~_______.____ _ t ~ -T -, _.1 !"~-.. rf O r' r 1, ~ u• ~-~/ ~ , __ y~ ~,9 S"L~ /~J l-~ c~ _~--- ~q~~ s ~ r' ~,~ t~ ~ o~ i ~ , . --• ~R ~~~-~~~4 aC..~~.~-~~_ ."~'-r~~v ~c_' > ; f!~ ~2~/GI'c ~ ~fG~ o r~ ~~Rc-~-~r ~f z-. y~-s ~ ~'- ~~ ~c,~%~-` ~ ~T ~ A kT F. >N A ,~ r c.. ~ ~~,~~R . ~ 0 5 ~o~ ,~,v ~ Q .. ,~ ~~. 9g5'~- ~ 8'~~ ~•D~tts`w ~ i~a~ ~t'• ~~11a~(?~C~~c~rnGraAt~w ~~~ ~~t)ca T -~_. -.P~~-V..n.+vc!V V~ -- ~ ~~~" _ 7L"7tT v't 1t.J_~ ~~b ~',~ ., . _.3~f> ~9fs`7 '_-s~` ~ g J`~' ~/,~r,_.._ ~~~~9~/ PETIT'I(~N - ---- _ ----7 -I~R~I-Arl~ B-i1`lE~- - ------ :~3-Bl~~~~- _ --- - - _ _- -_ ---- r 3?~£ - - ,: ,., ~. ~ti •„ ,,~, :. i .-. p ~ -- ~_. i.._ ~T e -- ~-- ----- '~ ~ ~7 'R r `' j~ __~ - - _ . l( ~ ~ f ~~ ,c~~ T Lc ~~~, -~----~Id~.1.~ ~~.1~~s~.~_,.~.~ ~ ivy-~~3~ ,:~ "'t` ' may- - ~ '' ~'. ~,/'~'•` ~r ~ ,r'`~_~ --~~// ~) . - / _: ~ ~ - - . • __ `r ~ ~ T' ~ __ ~_ ----- - __-- - -- y tr r• ~- _~'.Y --- -.. _ _- - --- ~- 2 I Z3 rc..~ X ~r ~ ,n c ~ u ~ ~`'- -- ----,--1 ~~. _ - -- -,~. _ ~~1G r~~c ir, t~ << ~4 ~ ~/ ~' J ..ZT,~ V4'e, the uttdt;rsigtizd residents of ti'ittdsor Hills and Ca~•e Spritjg I~lagisterial Districts, and parents i~f cllildret2 att~tlding Hidda22 ~'atla~~ Junior High School. ]terab~" petitiot2 the Roanoke Counh• Board of Super~~i~ors, The Virginia Deparnllellt of Trallsportation, and "rha Roasloke County Scllool Board for ihetr assistance and sere ice in acyliiring a h-altic cunh-ol de~~ice to be installed <•tt the intersection of Hidden ~'alle~" School Road alld Flect2-ic Road (Rt. '419) in Roanoke Count,• in response to increased traffic and ire an effort to promote 5afeh• for the elliidret2 of tlt~ school Arid tnetnbes•s of the ITloturing public. - - - -.. - - _ --- --- ~'.~-'-,~..F~ PETITION u~'a, the undersigned rasideuts of ~7~'indsor Hills and Cave Spring 1~~lagisterial T~ist-icts. and parents of children attending Hidden ~"alley Junior High School. hereb~~ petiliou the Roanoke Counh F3oard of Supervis~~rs. 7'he ~"irginia Daparhlient of Transportation, and The Roanoke Countt~ School Board for their assistance and service in acquiring a tral7ic control device to be installed ~~it the intersection o1~Hidden ~~'alle~- School Road and Electric Road (Rt. X19) in Roanoke County in response to inerea~ed t-aftic and in an effort to promota safet~~ for The children of the school and members of the motoring public. ~ . ni~~~rU ~ ~~#1-~ -- r =~D~3~~~,~- --------- -- - -R~~ 43A~- _ - L ~C~~a._~~?,.~,~ - _ - ~ ~vn~ ~ ~~r-o w r ~_ ___ _._~S `~ v 2 ~.Su( r c~ vi/ Cad . _- ~- --- - i ~~ 7 ~- ~ 3 --- f '~''+G ( .1 ~ y _ -.L_.._^ _ =~ ~_6-L:~._-..... - -.-_ -_... ~~~_/ ~_ / - ~ _ fll ~)_"t1f i ~s ~1 ! ~--- t - - 1~--- -) ~ ~ --'~-- ~ ~ .____- -_ -- _~ -- + _ -- r ~ ~ T .1 T ~= .7 , I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ,, -~'le_C'Ge,2-~Q _ _a ~!so~-~ -- __ _ _ __ -~_ ~ ~-~~--- -- _ - I -. ~, . C~~~c 1!~~~a~ ~ __ ' S"g G~t l-tl -- ~: ~,~. fi ~~~~ ~._~ ! Sal ~--~'~~~-1,..r-__ U~i ~~~-:~C ~_- -- __ - - - ? -- T-- r I __,~'~i~cslla~n~~.~_ -~c~_~- ~-35~_~~~ - 153D l.cjr, v_~ _ ~~ona.lo~ ~l~Gt5CX0. J 'L. .S~7~~. ~~//~ ~~_ .~-~ ~7~ -$ ~Y. --_ _ _ _ _ -- - (_- - i a~w.a ar U c , ' - -- ~ - - S - -- ~ - ~, ~ j a - ~~~ -'I - ---- T -- ~ - _ ~m~ -- ~ _~! ~ G?'~~._ I ree~ Lo~ne_I _~~ -~6 Via' ~e-iCr_~_ -- -1- i --- __ -- 1-- __ _ - ____ - ~__ __ j _-- --~ -- PETITION We, the undersigned residents of Windsor Hills and Cave Spring 1~~fa~isterial Dish'iets, Rlld parents Of CI111dreI1 atte11d1l1g Hidden ~'`allev TL1111ot' J~1~11 Sch001, hZl'~l)~' pZhtlOtl tllZ 1ZOalloke COLlllt\' BOaI'd of SLlper\'1SOrS, "Mlle ~ lI'glIlla Depa1-tlnellt Of TI'aIlSportat10I1, atld The Roanoke County School Board for their assistance and ser~~ice in acc~lliring a h-atYic control device to be installed at the intersection of Hidden Valley School Road and Electric Road (Rt. X19) iu Roanoke Coullt<- in response to increased h'affie and iu an effort to promote safet~~ for the children of the school and nlenlllers of the motoring public. _ n>`r~rr>w- ~~~~~~'1~~-~-R~--- - -- --- - ~ ~1~I~~L,~zT:~~r~ _~ r~r~~i-1rJS,~--------- -,--1~~-~E3A1£--__ , I n ~_~' cal: ~ .~L~ ---~_ ~ t,~. c~~ ~~..,_~ ~`_~_~I _~-~~- _~~~~~±~~-_ '~'~~~~~ --`~ ----- - -- -- n~__~_~~~-` -- ' --- ----- --- - -- // T - ~ ~~. ~-~-..- --- i 4 n ct ~ c. .~ o h n .~ c7 n 5'.3 yam- C ~ i e 5 r ~_ R~ . S (~ 7 7 ~/ =5 ~/ 7,3 ~, ,~~~ ----- ~ -- I~-- - - -- - ---_--1 _ _ --- --- -_ -- --- - ..: ~ -u ~_ --- - - --- ~~~ ~' ' ~_ccctA- -- - --- -- ~ -- --~7ec~c,~~C~cF~ -- -:.5hr-~w~~~_ C~--! `~ - ~.~ ~,~ .,~ ~,~C~ ~~'~_~~,~,hcr, Ir1-~,~~~ ~ --(05'1 _-_ -- - _ ~ ~ _- - , - .-._. ..- - .- --.-__.._ - __ T -_ -. - ~,~ cCr„~-I ~~_~l,}_ia.- ~~~~-_i~ C ~.s !- 3 ~1-3 ~t L''v~`~ ~, ~~,~ ~ c~ -!,I 7 l -~ _ U `--1__I~ f '- -- -~ ~~- J _ 7-- ,, _.. J I `! : - -~ ~ - - _ - r ,7 1 ~ - ~I r , / i ` 1~ "--- _ ~ " _ _-- -- I // ----~ ~ L(Ll. t." In ~ ; -~ `~ {oi::I ~ L\ <' j ~ ,- ~ r i -.._z L. __ _ - _ - 1S ~_ _T i ~~ ~ I ~ ~ ,_~ _ C?n ; I,` ~ ~ '~e ~t ~~ c~,,.- j (/j C~ ~l ~~-/ ~-~ e'ti,~° J ~~, ~l t ~i.c.~ n 5~~-~- J~ _ t 7.7 4~ -- ---- `~ ~{ _ /' -- - - ~ i ~ ~ r~ 1 f-k~lc~1~~~ I ~~c~ F~~~ ~.~~~ ~~ ~3 j r ~ ,~~,__ _' Ivy I~cisc~~ ~ `~`l~~ ,~ ,/ _ ~L -_ . - - -~- - - - - -r u~~ ~ t 1,~,'~-.~~ ~i,~~~l `~~i I ~'~~- ~~`S5_ C~.~ ~ ~~ ~ c~ _~r_ ! ~ ~ I _ ._ ~~35`~'' ---~- - - -- _ 5~ - - --- --- - - --- T- ~~ T ---- ~ - PETITION Vb~e, the undersigned residents of t~'indsor Hills and Cave Spring ~~lagisterial Disl~•icts. and parents of children attending Hidden ~"alley Junior High School, herebti- petition the Roanoke Counh~ Board of Supervisors, The Virginia Dapartiiient of Transportation, and Tlia Roanoke County School Board for their assistance and service in acc~luiring a traffic conh-al device to be installed at the intersection of Hidden ~'alle~~ School Road and Flectrie Road (Rt. -~19) in Roanoke Coiulh~ in response to increased n-aftic and in an effort to promote safat<~ f~~r the children of the school and members of the motoring public. r _ --_._- -_- --' TZtll-rl Lr a __- '.. 133 /~L~/f~.t~`i /~,~ _'~ -- ~' 7~ 3~Y~ ~'! --- -- ~, ~ T_~ S-~~O I - -- -- - t~ ~ ~ I L_ I~ c ,J ~ ~ ~-~ ~!i ! ~ i (.~ Y ~~~a i'~Q.. I ~Vl~.v-~Gr" !~! S~.Z--~~ CwG~{..L t- ~ ~i i 7 Irv _ 3`{ by ~~ -- ~ ~ ~ IKL-'~rr_~ TNo.m~pso.~ ~3`l~!y_~ACL~T'~_-~~._S,~__~Z7Y-6l:G~_.._,!', ---- - ---- - --- --T --- - - - -==~-- -- - - T .~ --T - -....- - ~~G -~ .~ . ._ -~ _ -_ ~ ?? y-. X1.5 ~ ~~~~~_ !_~j i e_~I i~u_ {~c.~ f~~~z~o~~. ----,--~-~~~_ I/c~~G~u~ ~`C -T ~-~ ~=---~~--' /~ I ~~ ~~ ~ d ~~ ----- ------_ --- 5l --~--- ---- r ~- - - ~- ,r`--- _ ~ () ~ V {~'(`~~~sc>~ ~"~5~~ S 511~~ry~ccy'' ~•~24'~;~; ~~tr ` ~~Y~ i ---- ~ , ', , ~,~~~~ 1. ,~ s ~ sue- ~~ ~ a ~ »~f - ~~~23 _ - __ ! ~ ~ n ~~ ,. __~ I ~ ~_ ~ "~/ :~ s~ ~ i ! r PETITION We, the tutdarsigned residents of Windsor Hills and Ca~~e Spring I\lagisterial Districts. and parents of children attending Hidden ~"alley Junior High School, hereb~~ petition the Roanoke C'ounh~ Board of Super~~isors, 'I~he ~%irginia Department of Transportation, and The Roanoke Cotuitti~ School Board for their assistance and ser~~ice in acquiring a h-afTic control deg ice to be installed at the intersection of Hidden ~'alle~~ School Road and F_,Icch'ic Road (Rt. X19) iu Roanoke County ui response to increased traffic and in an effort to promote safett~ for the children of the school and members of the motoring public. --~ ~L -~-- `_ -,l --_ __ --- f~,--- ~_ i _~~~--~1gd~_I - i - _' -,r- ~1 ~ ~ ~ J 1 u~ v -- - - ~c.U /~ ~ ~ - ~ I i I --- - ~ yr ~~ ~ c ~-~~lY~~--- - J r Imo' ~~ '7 ? ~ Z "`7 ,~ _ ~ -`"'- - I! ~~ r. ~' ~~- vc=! r it a y~6 7- ~ ~ ~ 7~!1- L- ~- - -~~~~ ~~`~ 5~ -- i -- -------- ,-------_----- ~-~~tw~n ~-------- -iJ C tom-{ - -- - - -- _- - ~ _ -~ctSCv ~` PETITION u'e. tha undarsianed rasidants of \~'indsor Hills acid Cava Spring l~~lagistarial Distt•icts, and parents of children attending Hidden ~'allev Junior High School, hereb~~ petition the Roanoka County Board of Supervisors. 'I'ha Virginia Daparhneiit of Transportation, and Tha Roanoka County School Board for their assistance and sarvica in acquiring a traflic control device to ba installed at the intarsection of Hidden ~~'allav School Road and Flactric Road (Rt. X19) in Roanoke County° in responsa to incraased t~-aftic and in an effort to promote safaty for the childran of the school and mambers of the motoring public. ~- ~I F,~F: ~ I-h~ RF I R-I~ ; l~ ~~3B~i~ 4~~---- - F-~ I (3N-~; - ~9 q f,U s l7 d~ L ~a z ~ - , --- ~ 63 --- - -- -- T 8 _ - ---~---- . ~ ~ ---- .. k -- ~ ~ ..._ _ L! ~ -- _ _ _ _ .._ _ ~ .T_--__ _ _- _ _- _- -. - _ _ _-.. -_. -. - _ _. _ - _ _._ -__X~.- _ - _._- _- _ ~ 1 ,, - _ 7 ,. a~ '_' _ _ a -- -- i--_:.1a K, (bah --- -_ 3$~1 Uaci~ha 1 Qd s w ~11'f- 3is' 1 ~~ ~- I ~ i ~~ _ T- F - ---- --- -- --- _ _ _ -------- __ - :------ --_ _-- ---T _ -- _- _ ---_--- -- ----- - --- --- _ ~~ r - _- _ _ -_ ----- -- - ---T-- -- -~- -- --, ~- - - -- - - --- -- ---- ----r_ -- -_ _ --- -- - i - - -- --- T_ - --. _ ___ - _. -._-_--_..--_ _-1. -.___- PETITION ~'e, tha undersigned rasidents of ~~~indsor Hills and Cave Spring ~~Iagistet-ial Dist~•icts. and parents of cliildreu attending Hidden ~%allev Junior High School, herab~~ petition the Roanoka Counh Board of Supervisors, The Virginia Departmant of Transportation, and The Roanoke Coulih.' School Board for their assistance and sarvice in acquiring a h-at~ic control dzvica to be ilistalled at the intersection of Hidden Valle~~~ School Road and Electric Road (RT. X119) in Roanoke Cowit< in response to increased traffic and in an effort to promote safet~~ for the children of the school and members of the motoring pt~blie. ~--c71 <7Y `C"~Y-[:'-ICI':-------- D~~-L7-T1':`TY~'Yt~--- :~ T1TlD T.'CL ___..---- ,Ir~-~Y-1 rJ p ----- ~~C ''~y~c.,~_~'~ ~_ ~a~v~~~~P~-cG'C'/1..__..__~`~iJG ~~rl//!~/l~_/~~ _T/._C~/./~S~ II - - - -~ A ) I ~ /~~ae~,C ~- ~ ,~ ~,~ ~~ ~/~ ~ J~~ t/~~ ~ ~ ~fif~S ~'~ rJ9~i Pr l~- SGC~ ; 71 ~ ~C~~~ ,~ -- r/'e `rr ~ ~ _ - ,_ . .y ,. 'u'~ a ~~`,L-~ ~ ,}e4 N - ~ ~C.~/~i,i~Ai+~ ..nom ~. ~ /ice; - --- `~" 1 ~•2~n ~~"-e'lv1 ~t, --- - j_Rr_~~CFq _~r~'Nr•.~-- -- i ~ ~ <~ ~~ ,, - -- -1-~'h-- ~ __~'r-1e_: _~~'-~- ~~x it cwt- ! 5%a ~~1 r a ~ r- _ T r -- --- -- ~i-- - - ---- -- U -- - -- ~~5~ ~ ~_ ~S~~Z 1~~_~~f t ~2_d~__ --~~77~ ~-ti~ 1~ ', ~%~z5 ~~~~ L~ j7;~-~i~ ~ II 4~5-~_ ~..~- ~ I_ ~~_t `tom 3~ ~~s~~~ ~ ~~~-139~' -- - II c%/r17 BRU~KF~ECd~-~---- I~ ~7~-7$~L __..-_--I~ / :~-/~[-!~~ it - - -- 1-~-~1__~?._- 5 -- -- ---- -----------h- - - -- ------ ~a 35 l~ic~ P G~~/- ~. --z~y ~~ ~, ~, _ T-k-~r-r~~-~~ ---- ~~_ y-a~s" ~ (o s-~ - Fci ; rwG, y- V ~ rcl.i trl j 7 7 y ``~'S~_3 _ ___ 1 ~(.YRI ~~~ car ~~ C`,'~. ~77c • `~ ~ ~- ----- _ /ri - ~ GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA of General Amount Fund Revenues Audited Beginning Balance at July 1, 1998 $7,947,047 7.71% July 28, 1998 Second installment on West County Business Park ($1,115,300) Balance at Mazch 9, 1999 $6,831,747 6.63% ~ Changes below this line are for information and planning purposes only. Balance from above $6,831,747 West County Business Park -balance ($1,057,650) $5,774,097 5.60% ~ Note: On December 18, 1990, the Board of Supervisors adopted a goal statement to maintain the General Fund Unappropriated Balance at 6.25% of General Fund Revenues 1998-99 General Fund Revenues $103,087,232 6.25% of General Fund Revenues $6,442,952 Respectfully Submitted, Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance Approved By, 6ieX~ ~~- ~ r Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator M:\Finance\Common\Boazd\Gen98. WK4 ~'f1 CAPITAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Amount Audited Beginning Balance at July 1, 1998 $768,458.71 Amount added from 1997-98 operations per rollover policy $471,083.00 Projects appropriated in 1998-99 original budget ' Center for Research and Technology (100,000.00 Blue Ridge Parkway Interpretive Center (30,000.00; South County Park Development (100,000.00; North County Soccer Field (50,000.00; Police Firing Range (50,000.00; Courthouse Renovations (75,000.00, McDonald Farm (100,000.00, Dec 1, 1998 Purchase of land at library headquarters (91,550. Dec 15,1998 / Underground storage tank remediation (to be replenished Jan 4, 1999 with year end rollover) (11,948. Balance at March 9, 1999 $631,042.93 Note: $100,000 of these funds have been temporarily advanced to the Mayflower Hills Park Respectfully Submitted, ~~ ~.~~ Approved By, ~.- ~~~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator M:\Finance\Common\Board\Cap98.WK4 /Y1- 3 RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Amount From 1998-99 Original Budget $210,000.00 June 23, 1998 Roanoke Valley Convention & Visitors Center (107,500.00) Sept 8, 1998 Contribution to TAP Transitional Living Center (9,650.00) Oct 13, 1998 Matthews Electroplating SuperFund Remediation (22,790.00) Nov 17, 1998 Demolish abandoned structure (10,000.00 Jan 12, 1999 Roanoke Regional Chamber dues (2,500.00) Balance at March 9, 1999 $57,560.00 Respectfully Submitted, ~~~. Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance Approved By, ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator M:\Finance\Common\Board\Board98.WK4 m-y FUTURE SCHOOL CAPITAL RESERVE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Amount Savings from 1996-97 debt budget $670,000.00 Transfer from County Capital Projects Fund 1,113,043.00 FY97-98 Original budget appropriation 2,000,000.00 23, 1998 Savings from 1997-98 debt fund 321,772.00 FY98-99 Original budget appropriation 2,000,000.00 Balance at March 9, 1999 $6,104,815.00 Respectfully Submitted, !~~'~.. ~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance Approved By, ~- ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator M:\Finance\Common\Board\Schoo198.WK4 /'~-5 Proposed Budget Calendar As of March 9, 1999 October -December • Annual update of departmental CIP requests • Budget Kickoff- Phase I Business Plans (Teams) • Governor releases proposed state budget • CIP submissions due to Budget Department Janua • Phase II Budget Kickoff -Investment Budgeting (1/13/99) • Targets distributed to departments • Business Plans Due (1/15/99) • CIl' Draft completed • Preliminary revenue projections complete (1/22/99) • Revenue Team meets to discuss projections (1/28/99) • Investment Budgets Due (1/29/99) • Mid Year Revenue and Expenditure reports to BOS (1/30/99) ** February • CIP Work Session with Board of Supervisors (2/23/99) ** • Public Hearing: General Comment on the FY 1999-00 budget (2/23/99) ** • Public Hearing: Tax rates and tax assessments (2/23/99) ** • Functional Budget Team presentations (week of 2/22/99) March • Functional Budget Teams present to County Administrator (week of 3/8/99) • :Board of Supervisors adopts tax rates (319f99} ** • Budget V~ark session: School +~ County revenue update. • Work session: 3oim County -- School Board (3123199) ** • Work session: Corrtributions to local human, cultural, and tourism service agencies** April • School Budget !hie {4/1!99) • Work session: Volunteer Fire and Rescue Chiefs • Board Adopts School Budget (4113199) *'~ • Cowry Administrator presarrts budget to Board {4/13199) *x • Public Hearing on Proposed Budget (4127/99) ** Mav • Boatel. Adopts FY 1999-04 Budget and CiP (5111199) ** • First Readang of appropriation ordinance (51 i 1/99} ** • Second heading elf appropriation ordinance (5125/99) ** Notes• ** Shading indicates dates in which Board of Supervisors involvement is needed. t r} ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER tJ""' 1. Introduction and Scope 2. Update on the Project - Gardner Smith - V D O T Representatives 3. Considerations for Zoning Issues -County Staff (Staff seeks guidance on Non-conforming issues) The briefing will include: (a) Number of properties and owners affected (b) Estimated number of non-conforming properties (c) Types of conflicts identified along corridor (d) Options available to the County AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 9, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: Work Session on I-81 Widening and Construction in Roanoke County ('OUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS• BACKGROUND: This time has been set aside for an update from VDOT and a discussion with VDOT and the County Staff of I-81 widening issues having an impact on County residents and businesses along the corridor. Si AMY OF INFORMATION• Below is an outline of the agenda to be covered during the work session: .,, o-~ Res e ully submitted, dner W. S ith Deputy Assistant for Citizen Services ACTION Approved ()Motion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To Approved by, ~,,.~' Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator VOTE No Yes Abs McNamara _ _ Harrison _ _ _ Johnson _ _ _ Minnix _ _ _ Nickens ACTION NO ITEM NUMBER ~ "" •~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 9, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: Work Session on FY 1999-2000 Budget Development. ('OUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS The enclosed information and information provided to the School Board represents the best estimates of revenues and expenditures to date, based on available information. These estimates are subject to further adjustments as additional information becomes available over the next several weeks. ~UI~iMARY OF INFORMATION: This time has been set aside for a budget work session to discuss items related to development ofthe FY 1999-00 budget. This work session will focus on the following items for discussion: Proposed State Funding for Schools County Revenue Projection Updates for FY98-99 and FY99-00 Budget Development Calendar Revisions Revenue estimates for the current year and FY99-00 have taken on added complexity due to changes in state funding formulas and methodologies. In addition, year-to-date collections for local revenues and volatile econonuc indicator projections for the next 12 months have underscored the need for careful estimates. The following items indicates significant areas of concern that are currently being analyzed: State Revenues: Details on specific appropriations from the General Assembly have been slow coming from Richmond, VML, and VACO. 599 funding for law enforcement and Compensation Board funding appears to remain at previously reported levels. However, School funding is less clear. There are a number of changes in funding, primarily to do with lottery proceeds. There remains some questions regarding the ADM used by the state to calculate funding, usage of lottery proceeds (recurring versus non- recurring expenditures), and details on state funding of teachers salaries. D-z Personal Property: This revenue category has been adjusted downward since the last reporting to the Board. Indications from the Commissioner of Revenue's office are that new car registrations are steady ,but not significantly above last year's levels. This information combined with Roanoke City's projection of flat personal property growth precipitated the downward adjustment. The Commissioner has indicated that a preliminary tax assessment run can be generated in the next several weeks. This information will be helpful in estimating current and next year's revenue. Sales Tax: Sales tax revenues through November were experiencing modest gains; however, the revenues generated from the Christmas shopping season were almost 10% below the 1997 Christmas season. This result has left year-to-date revenues for sales tax almost flat when compared to year-to-date collections from Last year. Next month's collections should help us verify if a downward trend can be expected to continue or not. Attached you will find s<unmary information on these topics for further discussion during the work session.. Respectfully submitted, Approv d by, Brent Robertson Elmer C. Hodge Budget Manager County Administrator ACTION Approved ( } Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To () Motion by: VOTE No Yes Abs Harrison _ - _ Johnson - _ McNamara - _ Minnix _ _ Nickens _ _ ~-" Roanoke County and Roanoke County Schools Worksheet for the Budget Process 1999-2000 Budget Year (Working Document -Subject to Change) Revenues County Sources Allocation to Future School Construction Increase in Local Revenues Real Estate $ 2,055,000 Personal Property (130,000) Sales Tax 325,000 Other taxes and fees 730,627 Increase in State Revenues 599 Lazy Enforcement 803,000 Compensation Board 313,000 Other state revenues 126,891 Increase in School Sources Lottery proceeds SOQ funding M:\Finance\BudgetlProposed\Schoals 3/4/99 1,222, 702 2,980,627 1,242,891 1,543,205 620,200 2,163,405 $ 7,609,625 1 Expertr~i tares VPS Rate lncr-ease County 318,000 Schools 600,000 Health Insurance Increase County 500,000 Schools 958,000 Debt Sejvice School Construction 1,222,702 Gle;a Ib1a~-~ 1,057,650 CPMT Increase 75,000 Non-Sala3~ ex~~e:ac~ifi~res 4,731,352 Cost o~1 /Q satar-y i~TCrease County 313,000 Schools 731,400 ~~~ 2 i~ 'O N N M ~ ~f -~ tf h t~ tD O h O Of 10 th t~ t~ e- ~ 9~ N P1 O N O N N O O~ N 00 ~ r N N 00 N OI C? M ('7 ~ C Q ~ U ~ ~ e ~ l0 ~ ~ O ED O f~ tp 1~ f0 1~ M fD !~ Ql iR 7 O N r V 1~ O ('1 N C C L OI , 4~ O O ~ ~- t4 O 1A OQ n O C fV r ~ M O GT V' ~ (~ R ~ m 8O O8 O O O 8 O ~o Op O O O 8 O O O O 1p O~~ Np N Ip~App ~Qp~ O p~~ N I(7 (O iA ~ N ~D N 1~ O t0 Q ~ O n to 1~- N (O Mf R f0 O N In d' (7 N ~- .- W nj Y! W W N N W tp N N R N N N W fR tlf IH H M tl! O h M! ~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O ~ 01 O ~I ~ O O OI O IA O O IA in 0 IA N CO a0 N Of ~ ~ M pf) IA ~ O ~ n b v ~ N N P~ '- v O N N N n.. O 1n O O O O O O O OO O O O O O O (D N O O ~ pp p pp 1~ op ~j e ~ p 8 N ~( ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A ~ ~ IA (O N ~D 00 tD W V l~ I l' ~ O c Q Q N N N Q l'7 .- N ~ f0 .- v~ lh G ~ W d ~ 3R ~ 34 ~ ?R ~ ~ dt 3Q ~ ?R ~ ~ ~ 3Q 34 eR ~ iR ~ ~ Y, .7 0 = y ~ ~ pNp 01 h ~D r; N O t~ 1~ IA M ~O R ty-~ ~p~ f~ r- Of N N I1~A l+f O N N lh 1Q~O ~ V $ ~' 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ < M m n N Q 1n l7 ( d ~~ wm O ~ ~ ~ ~ } ~ ~ C C 3 ~ OD ~~pp acCpOp ppN~~ app O p App dap < O R t~ N pN~ eO~ ~Op tD ~ ~ l f0 N- a0 G ~ ~ M ~ ~ ID I N / O O 1~ Yf C9 ~ O u ~ . 7 A h W i~ 1~ ~ epF C~1 Q 00 ~Opf N ~ N Of app h N O Pf ~ ~ r V n: .N- O ~f N ~ N (~f M ON R N ~ COtO O EQD~ O D lQ yy LL~ N N N E r' N ~ ~ p M ~ _ d CO (h R IT! OQ (ham. e- N ~ 1~ OD lp~ IA O ~ in ~ ~ ~ IA N ~ l'7 CO ~ Of ~ Q in CO 1A ~ ~ OD 1A ~ V O Q t f ~D ^ (q (ppppp IA in N M N ID Of P1 CO (7 O n Il) n N ~ ~ N I N O 1A M V I ~ I + R O ~ Q~ A n N W C~ (p A ( 1 ~~ N N Q l'7 ~ ~ N r m N 7 tNN~ fCpD ~A 1+ O ~7 t~ 6f 11N(~~ NNN 1p~ 1~ R {Q~ ~ey~ I O GD O ~ h N R CO ~ ~ N n ~ n ^pp O ^ ID N Q~ N M 1f1 A Q~ NV m M ~ V t0 N N O M M NV W^ m ~ (O f~l Q f~ fO Q7 N l'7 N 7 R Ol V a~ ~ ^ ( to of O N N M lh N ~ 10 N N l6 F p~ X = Lm O m ~' m q O O ~+ ~ ~ tl F V .d ~ ~ "~ ~ C Z a~ > ~ ~ ~ ~ ° m ~ ~,i 5 ~ ~ w ~ a v~ ci ~ LL ~ ' ~ ~~~s~~~;~m~ ~~~~~~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~' ~-- xa ~~m oB~~x~o ai~~o~~t~u i! ~ ~ o-a b m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ '7~CflN(NCOr'OOI~tA~t~tnt~Nf~ODOOeI'0•-- 0 \ e- 0 \ O 0 \ e- .~~ ~ ~O~-'^tAN~0a=0'0000.=~'er<G~e~'00~ ~ O st e ~ ch ~- N t U $000000000000000ooo•-r• ao 0 0~ O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p O O O O N O ~ ~- m OO000Cfl 000000 OOOOOOOO ~ o H ~ ~ tff Optntf)~ tAtA00~Atn~Y 1`-0tc') OO~NO ` ' M M M ~'r OMNN~-~' r-~M 00`~NMvO - O r M r ~- `'' r, ~ ~-' r ``' N N N N N ~ C t1 ~ N ~`' ~ V! d,- ~ E d O ~ ~ > O d O ~ ~ N O ~ ~ r ~ ~ LL V `~n V L 'd V ~~ 'a ,~,, C a~ ~ a 00 u}. .II ~ ~' O ~ ~. Q m LL 00oooooaooooo0 000 000 000000000o0oooSooogooo 000000000000oooo~r,oo~n~ ~n tnOetOtnpOtAO~OOO OOd'hMNN ~ ~-t~?NO(DOOtONM~-NN~00f~-OO~t(fl M f~tA1Aa-NfDc'O~AO~DsT'~I~C~tn1~NtA 'd"0~ N ~NNOeTtM rr N r hr' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T M N °o~°o°O°oo°o °o `o'°o°o°oo°o°o°o°Soc°sr~ rn O O to to O to 0 0 to 1A O~~ O f~ 0 0~ t~ 0 0 N ~ (O pp0l~tf)e~ O~ ~OMf~OM~p OI~N000~ ~" (O (L1 V'1`r~AMtA~ONM~DI~tt')(ON~D r-00 O ~N~etM r' N r Cfl~ C7 N ~ W H m V ~( ~p ~ N X ~ m N ~ ~ Nt-m ~`°xco Uma`.~m ~ ~ ~m ~ U ~ y J 7 '~ V d X ~ H x ~ N ~ ~ 'o F- X ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N '~ m m ~a~~ N~ ~ ~ o m r~ m~ c o m~ m ca oaroNC~~,,, a~tL.ao•.-~m3 c m w oacnU ~~ `-c°aL~ N ~ L3 coo ~`-° ~ ~ m ~ ~a0 °~mm~~=~UOa'u.~U~~Uu. m C m Q' 0 c .U H 0 N ti 0 N r ti m c m m c .~ m c 0 z ti O M ti 0 N M N ti O O M O_ 69 C d E O O m c m 0 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER V "~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 9, 1999 SUBJECT: Work Session on Financing Options for Local Public Works Improvement Projects COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: Local Public Works Improvement Projects have normally provided financing options for initial participants. There has been concern that owners purchasing property after the initial project commitment window should be afforded similar financing option. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Staff intends to present various options to provide financing to property owners for these projects. It is hoped that one of these options or an alternative can be agreed upon and presented to the Board for approval. SUBBMITTED BY: APPROVED: _ ~,~,j,,,.~ Gary Robe son, P.E. Elmer C. Hodge Utility Dire for County Administrator Approved ( ) Denied () _ Received ( ) Referred _ to ACTION Motion by: VOTE No Yes Abs Harrison _ _ Johnson _ _ McNamara _ _ _ Minnix _ _ _ Nickens AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 9, 1999 RESOLUTION 030999-10 CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each member's knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting to which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Certification Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Harrison cc: File Executive Session A COPY TESTE: ~. Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Q~ ANA ti. ~ ~ 2 Ov , a~ 1838 MARY H. ALLEN, CMC CLERK TO THE BOARD P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (703) 772-2005 FAX (703) 772-2193 March 10, 1999 Mr. B. Clayton Goodman, III Vinton Town Manager P. O. Box 338 Vinton, Va 2179 Dear Mr. Goodman: BRENDA J. HOLTON DEPUTY CLERK Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 030999-6 approving a voluntary settlement between the County of Roanoke and the Town of Vinton, requesting a review of the agreement by the Commission on Local Government and stating the intention of the Board of Supervisors to readopt the agreement and to petition the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, subsequent to the Commission's review, to approve the settlement. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, March 9, 1999. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, yrc.~ f, yJ. ~~ Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bjh Attachment cc: Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney ~i~n~ ~~ h~~~t ~ir~~~e~l Fin~~~e ~~~~~1= ~~~s~, ~~ ~s~., M~~s ~ ~~~~~~~~~, ~ 1122 C~~or~x~#~ n~ ~~~txt~~.e ~. fox 1122, Richmond, VA 23218- ® R Paper O~ POANp,`.~ G ti ~ ~ z c~ a, r sa MARY H. ALLEN, CMC CLERK TO THE BOARD C~~a~xx~# ~~ ~a~xx~~.~.~ P.O. BOX 29800 5204 ~€1~1~4~I~B D~Iti€ RgAN~k~~, YIR@IN~A 2a~t~,~~9~ (703) 772-2005 FAX (703) 772-2193 March 10, 1999 Mr. Fred Altizer District Engineer Virginia Department of Transportation P. O. Box 3071 Salem, VA 24153 Dear Mr. Altizer: ~~~~~~ ~: ~~U~~~~ DEPUTY CLERK Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 030999-1 requesting VDOT to continue funding projects currently on the plan and adopt those projects identified as "Projects not on plan" for inclusion into the 1999-2005 Primary and Interstate Six Year Improvement Plan. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, March 9, 1999. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Attachment cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development The Honorable Shirley J. Ybarra, Secretary of Transportation The Honorable Robert E. Martinez, Chairman, Commonwealth Transportation Board Lorinda G. Lionberger, Salem District, Commonwealth Transportation Board Mayor David A. Bowers, City of Roanoke Roanoke Valley Delegation to the General Assembly Senator John Warner, U. S. Senate Senator Charles Robb, U. S. Senate Congressman Robert Goodlatte Congressman Frederick Boucher ®~.yaea P~ From: "Arnold Covey" <ADM01/OAC> To: "Brenda Holton" <ADM01/BJH> Date sent: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 16:05:44 +0000 Subject: Re: Six Year Improvement Plan If you would go ahead and send out. But for show, at the March 23rd Preallocation Hearing I would like another certified copy so that Spike can hand to the Commonwealth Transportation Board. If problem, please let me know. ac > From: "Brenda Holton" <ADM01/BJH> > To: adm01 /oac > Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 15:44:54 +0000 > Subject: Six Year Improvement Plan > Arnold, for the resolution approving this plan, do you want me to > send you a certified copy for VDOT and a copy for you. > Then send others as list in the resolution (Sec of Transportation, > Chair Commonwealth Transp Board, etc.) with letter from Clerk "Here > it is", or do you want to send all copies from your department? > Just let me know how you want to handle. > Thanks. > Brenda Holton CMC > Deputy Clerk > 772-2005 Arnold Covey Department of Community Developmet Brenda Holton -- 1 -- Wed, 10 Mar 1999 16:21:10 From: "Paul Mahoney" <ADM01/PMM> To: "Brenda Holton" <ADM01/BJH> Date sent: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 16:10:56 +0000 Subject: Re: Vinton Gainsharing Reso Brenda: Please give me a certified copy that I can deliver in person next Monday to COLG. Send copy to Vinton, and to Carter Glass, IV Esq., Mays & Valentine PO Box 1122, Richmond, Va. 23218-1122. > Paul, for the gainsharing resolution, I have listed copies to Paul > Mahoney, Diane Hyatt, and Clay Goodman. Do you want me to add > anyone else for copies? Do you want me to write letter "here it is" > to send copies? Do I need to send anything to COLG? or will you > take care of that? Just let me know how you want to handle. Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Brenda Holton -- 1 -- Wed, 10 Mar 1999 16:20:08 From: "Paul Mahoney" < ADMO1/PMM > To: "Mary Allen" < ADMO1/MHA > Date sent: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 12:02:19 + 0000 Subject: Re: Work Session on Public Works Improvement Ord. > I watched the video on the above item (Grisso -Item G-2) > HCN recommended moving forward with 1st reading and then have a work > session to bring their thoughts on Joe McNamara's suggested changes. > After additional discussion, BI,J suggested moving forward with the > original motion to approve 1st reading and work through other issues > in a work session format. NO DATE WAS SET for the work session. > So, do you want to have WS on 3/9 or wait until later? MA: It will be difficult to prepare all the info necessary fora 3/9 work session; however, 3/29 looks too busy, and 4/14 is too late. I guess it will have to be 3/9. Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Mary Allen -- 1 -- Wed, 24 Feb 1999 12:03:21 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER MEETING DATE: March 9, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: Request from School Board for resolution to reimburse itself from State grant for student management software. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: The 1999 Virginia General Assembly approved funding to be allocated by the Virginia Board of Education to certain school divisions for student management software. Roanoke County's portion of the grant is expected to be up to $305,000. A resolution is needed to purchase prior to the sale of bonds. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The grant will be used to purchase software for student management. FISCAL IMPACT: None. This funding is contained in the 1998-99 operating budget. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends resolution to purchase student management software immediately and reimburse the School Board from grant funds. ~....w Dr . iTane Jams Director of Technology Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator --------------------------------- ACTION -------------------------------- VOTE No Yes Abp Approved ( ) Motion by: McNamara Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) Harrison Referred ( ) Minnix To Nickens cc: File Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Dr. Deanna Gordon, School Superintendent Brenda Chastain, Clerk, School Board FROM THE MINUTES OF THE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE COUNTY MEETING IN REGULAR SESSION AT 8:30 AM ON March 5, 1999 IN THE BOARD ROOM OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES. RESOLUTION OF THE SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE COUNTY DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO REIMBURSE ITSELF FROM THE PROCEEDS OF ONE OR MORE GRANTS MADE BY THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA FOR CERTAIN EXPENDITURES TO BE MADE IN CONNECTION WITH THE ACQUISITION SOFTWARE FOR STUDENT MANAGEMENT. WHEREAS, Roanoke County Public Schools (the "Division") is a political subdivision organized and existing under the laws of the State of Virginia; and WHEREAS, the Division will pay, after the date hereof, certain expenditures (the"Expenditures") in connection with the acquisition of software for student management; WHEREAS, the Roanoke County School Board of the Division (the "Board") has determined that the money to be advanced on and after the date hereof to pay the Expenditures are available only for a temporary period and it is necessary to reimburse the Division for the Expenditures from the proceeds of one or more grants to be made by the Commonwealth of Virginia (the "Grants") from the proceeds of its tax exempt notes (the Notes"); NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD AS FOLLOWS: Section I. The Board hereby declares the Division's intent to reimburse the Division with the proceeds of the Grants for the Expenditures with respect to the Project made on and after MARCH 9, 1999. The Division reasonably expects on the date hereof that it will reimburse the Expenditures with the proceeds of the Grants. Section 2. Each Expenditure will be of a type properly chargeable to this grant under general federal income tax principles (determined in each case as of the date of the Expenditure). Section 3. The maximum cost of the Project is expected to be $305,000. Section 4. The Division will make a reimbursement allocation, which is a written allocation by the Division that evidences the Division's use of proceeds of the Grants to reimburse an Expenditure, no later than 18 months after the later of the date on which the Expenditure is paid or the Project is placed in service or abandoned, but in no event more than three years after the date on which the Expenditure is paid. The Division recognizes that exceptions are available for certain "preliminary expenditures," costs of issuance, certain de minimis amounts, expenditures by "small issuers" (based on the year of issuance and not the year of expenditure) and expenditures for construction projects of at least 5 years. Section 5. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. PASSED AND ADOPTED this fifth day of March, 1999. Adopted on motion of Michael W. Stovall, seconded by Jerry L. Canada and on the following recorded vote: AYES: William A. Irvin, Michael W. Stovall, Jerry L. Canada and Marion G. Roark. NAYS: None ABSENT: Thomas A. Leggette TESTS: ~c-~,a.~,-~~~3: ~1~~" ,Clerk c: Mrs. Penny Hodge Mrs. Diane Hyatt File Interoffice Memo Date: 3/2/99 To: Mary Allen, Clerk to Board of Supervisors From: Arnold Covey, Director Community Development RE: Legal Notice Please advertise the following notice in the Roanoke Times on the dates shown below: ORDINANCE TO VACATE A PORTION OF A 15-FOOT DRAINAGE EASEMENT ON PLAT SHOWING SECTION NO. 1, EDGEMONT OF VINTON, PLAT BOOK 16, PG 41, AND FURTHER SHOWN ON LOT 5, BLOCK 3, SECTION 2, EDGEMONT OF VINTON, PLAT BOOK 18, PAGE 130, AND REVISED PLAT OF SECTION NO. 2, EDGEMONT OF VINTON, PLAT BOOK 18, PAGE 171, IN THE VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (TAX MAP N0.61.02-7-1) Dates: March 9, 1999 March 16, 1999 Thank you, PLEASE BILL: CHARLES R. SIMPSON, INC. 3420 ELECTRIC ROAD, SW ROANOKE, VA 24018 ACCOUNT # 32749000 3/2/99 Confidential MEMO To: Mary Allen, Clerk to Board of Supervisors From: Arnold Covey, Engineering and Inspections "~n Subject: Legal Notice Date: March 1, 1999 Please advertise the following notice in The Roanoke Times: REQUEST TO VACATE AS PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY WASHINGTON ROAD RECORDED IN PLAT 1, PAGE 363, PINKARD COURT SUBDIVISION IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT, ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA. Thank you. ARNOLD COVEY COUNTY OF ROANOKE P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VA 24018 MEMO To: Mary Allen, Clerk to Board of Supervisors From: Arnold Covey, Engineering and Inspections ~~ Subject: Legal Notice Date: March 1, 1999 Please advertise the following notice in The Roanoke Times: REQUEST TO VACATE AS PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY A PORTION OF GARMAN ROAD RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 51, FORT LEWIS ESTATES SUBDIVISION IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT, ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA. Thank you. ARNOLD COVEY COUNTY OF ROANOKE P.O. BOX 29800 ROANOKE, VA 24018 From: "Mary Spangler" < GUPO1/MJS > Organization: Roanoke Co. Utility Department To : adm01 /mha Date sent: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 07:52:50 + 0000 Subject: Board Reports Did you get the front page of the Acceptance Board Report for Canterbury Park, Section 11. I am sending another acceptance for Summerfield, Section 7 by interoffice mail and it is on the same shared file that Canterbury Park, Section 11 is on. If you have any problems getting these, let me know and I' 11 attach them to pegasus. Thanks. Mary Spangler, Office Support Specialist Utility Department 387-6104 Mary Allen -- 1 -- Wed, 3 Mar 1999 07:42:31 ~1~1~~1° ~ ~/~l/99 d ~o ~®~lo~o ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA MARCH 9, 1999 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. The meetings are broadcast live on RVTV, Channel 3, and will be rebroadcast on Thursdays at 7 P.M. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement in order to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings or other programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County, please contact the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772-2005. We request that you provide at least 48-hours notice so that proper arrangements may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call 2. Invocation: Gardner W. Smith Deputy Assistant for Citizen Services 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS D. BRIEFINGS i E. ~~ NEW BUSINESS 1. Request to adopt a prioritized list of Primary and Interstate projects to be presented in the pre-allocation public hearing for the Commonwealth Transportation Board FY 1999-2005 Six Year Improvement Program. (Arnold Covey, Director of Community Development) 2. ~~~-~cz e~~-~ Re approva Perf rma Agreement with R&L Carriers. (Tim 'rector of Economfc Development) Request forte of a Comprehensi a Stormwater Detention Agreement with the -~cea~lth Department of Transportation. (Arnold Covey, Di ector of Community Development) ~- 4. Consideration a Gainsharing Agreement with the Town of Vinton and submittal of the agreement to the Commission on Local Government (Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator) r ~~~ 5. Request to approve a~lem randum of Agreement with a Ls~J~ National Park Service -,ate Federal Highway Administratio for `~` design a~nzd comer strut~tion funds for the Blue Ridge Parkway ~c~-~~ ~~,~ ~~,~,~~-/ Interpret+ve Center. (Joyce Waugh, Assistant Director of Economic Development) 7. Request to establish the tax rates in Roanoke County for calendar year 1999. a. Order setting the tax rate on real estate for the calendar year 1999. (Brent Robertson, Budget Manager) b. Order setting the tax levy on all classes of personal property and machinery and tools for the calendar year 1999. (Brent Robertson, Budget Manager) F. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES a 1. First reading of ordinance authorizing the conveyance of a 37.86 acre parcel of realted estate located in the City of Salem known as the Lloyd property. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 2. First reading of ordinance to vacate as public right-of-way a portion of Garman Road located in the Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Roanoke County and Kroger Company. (Arnold Covey, Director of Community Development) 3. First reading of ordinance to vacate as public rights-way-way Washington Road recorded in Plat 1, page 363, Pinkard County Subdivision in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. (Arnold Covey, Director of Community Development) 4. First reading of Ordinance to Vacate a Portion of a 15-foot Drainage Easement on Plat Showing Section No. 1, Edgemont of Vinton, Plat Book 16, Pg 41, and Further Shown on Lot 5, Block 3, Section 2, Edgemont of Vinton, Plat Book 18, Page 130, and Revised Plat of Section No. 2, Edgemont of Vinton, Plat Book 18, Page 171, in the Vinton Magisterial District (Tax Map No. 61.02-7-1 ). (Arnold Covey, Director of Community Development) 5. First reading of ordinance authorizing construction of and financing for a Local Public Works Improvement Project -Little Brushy Mountain Water Project. (Gary Robertson, Utility Director) G. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Second reading of ordinance authorizing quitclaim and release of a 20-foot water line easement within the boundaries of Belmont Court and located between Lot 1, Block 1, Section 2, and Lots 12 and 13, Block 1, Section 2 of Triple Crown Estates in the Vinton Magisterial District. (Arnold Covey, Community Development Director) 2. Second reading of ordinance amending Ordinance 090997-5 3 authorizing the creation of and financing for a local public works improvement project, Mountain Heights Water Project. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 3. Second reading of ordinance approving the exercise of an option to purchase agreement with Salem Office Supply, Inc., for property located at 400 East Main Street, across from the Roanoke County Courthouse, in Salem, Virginia. (John Chambliss, Assistant Administrator) H. APPOINTMENTS 1. League of Older Americans Advisory Council 2. Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission 3. Commission for Senior and Physically Challenged Citizens I. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT A ENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Approval of Minutes -February 9, 1999 2. Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Canterbury Park, Section II. 3. Acceptance of donation of drainage easements to the Board of Supervisors in connection with the development of Edgemont of Vinton, Section 2, located in the Vinton Magisterial District. 4. Resolution requesting that the Virginia Department of Transportation add into the secondary system of state highways a new portion of Route 929 (Garman Road) and 4 abandon a portion of Route 929 (Garman Road) which no longer serves the public need. (Arnold Covey, Director of Community Development) 5. Donation of a 20 foot drainage easement and a new variable width drainage easement in Orchard Park, Section 2, by F & W Community Development Corporation. 6. Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Summertield, Section 7. J. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS K. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS L. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS M. REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Future School Capital Reserve 5. Update of 1999-2000 budget calendar 6. S a#~ment of T~easurer'~% Accountabili e\r investments and '~- p rtfolio .polic~ as of Febuary 2S; 'h999 ~.. .._ 5 N. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS O. WORK SESSIONS (4TH FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM) 1. Update on Widening of Interstate 81. (Gardner Smith) 2. Budget Work Session -debts and revenues ~ ~' ~'~~-~~'~ 3. Discussion on financing options for Public Works Improvement Projects. ~~_~dr.,.~, `. P. XECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A Q. CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION R. ADJOURNMENT 6 r'za'ufi q. 1L1~11 ~1~~ ~ ~/~~~ > e~O° ®® Jl'oL ~"1L o ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA MARCH 9, 1999 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. The meetings are broadcast live on RVTV, Channel 3, and will be rebroadcast on Thursdays at 7 P.M. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement in order to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings or other programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County, please contact the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772-2005. We request that you provide at least 48-hours notice so that proper arrangements may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call 2. Invocation: 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS D. BRIEFINGS i E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request to adopt a prioritized list of Primary and Interstate projects to be presented in the pre-allocation public hearing for the Commonwealth Transportation Board FY 1999-2005 Six Year Improvement Program. (Arnold Covey, Director of Community Development) ~. 2. Order setting the tax rate on real estate situate in Roanoke County for the calendar year 1999. (Brent Robertson, Budget Manager) Gio~ •Z !, ~ Order setting the tax levy on all classes of personal property and machinery and tools situate in Roanoke County for the calendar year 1999. (Brent Robertson, Budget Manager) 3 ~. Request for approval of a Performance Agreement with R&L Carriers. (Tim Gubala, Director of Economic Development) y ~ ~ - ~. _ ,~ ~ o ~. ~. F. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES ~ • ~~. 7~`~ ~/ne~ ~ p~~, 1. First reading of ordinance authorizing the sale of the Lloyd Property. ~ -~pQ~.~~ G. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Second reading of ordinance authorizing quitclaim and release of a 20-foot water line easement within the boundaries of Belmont Court and located between Lot 1, Block 1, Section 2, and Lots 12 and 13, Block 1, Section 2 of Triple Crown Estates in the Vinton Magisterial District. (Arnold Covey, Community a Development Director) 2. Second reading of ordinance amending Ordinance 090997-5 authorizing the creation of and financing for a local public works improvement project, Mountain Heights Water Project. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) ~ ~_ ~ H. APPOI TMENTS 1. League of Older Americans Advisory Council 2. Roanoke Valley Greer way Commission 3. Commission for Senior and Physically Challenged Citizens I. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Approval of Minutes -February 9, 1999 2. Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Canterbury Park, Section II. 3. Acceptance of donation of drainage easements to the Board of Supervisors in connection with the development of Edgemont of Vinton, Section 2, located in the Vinton Magisterial District. 4. Vacation of a portion of a drainage easement to the Board of Supervisors in connection with the development of Edgemont of Vinton, Section 2, located in the Vinton Magisterial District. 3 J. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS K. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS L. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS M. REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Future School Capital Reserve 5. Update of 1999-2000 budget calendar 6. Statement of Treasurer's Accountability per investments and portfolio policy as of February 28, 1999. N. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS O. WORK SESSIONS (4TH FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM) 1. Update on Widening of Interstate 81 -- ~~~x--~--~-~i 2. Budget Work Session - 0~# `'- ups 3. Discussion of possible amendments to the Public Works Improvement Ordinance. 4 P. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A Q. CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION R. ADJOURNMENT