Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout3/23/1999 - Regularr~rrr cs ~ erne euxE ROAN ,~ f L z ^ ` `''` ~ 1 38 ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION AGENDA MARCH 23, 1999 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. The meetings are broadcast live on RVTV, Channel 3, and will be rebroadcast on Thursdays at 7 P.M. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement in order to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings or other programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County, please contact the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772-2005. We request that you provide at least 48-hours notice so that proper arrangements may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call ALL PRESENT AT 3:02 P.M. 2. Invocation: The Reverend William T. Ross Vinton Baptist Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS ECH - (1) ADDED ITEM E-1, RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE DELETION OF MEALS TAX RESTRICTIONS FROM FOOD TAX RELIEF (21 ADDED EXECUTIVE SESSIONS FOR ITEMS H-1 AND H-3 AND ADDED POTENTIAL i ® Recycled Paper LITIGATION CONCERNING ITEM S-11. PMM -PRESENTED REVISED ORDINANCE FOR ITEM S-1 C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS NONE D. BRIEFINGS NONE E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Resolution requesting the deletion of Meals Tax restrictions from the Food Tax Relief Bill. (Brent Robertson, Budget Manager) R-032399-1 HCN MOTION TO ADOPT RESO URC F. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA: Approval of these items does not indicate support for, or judge the merits of, the requested zoning actions but satisfies procedural requirements and schedules the Public Hearings which will be held after recommendation by the Planning Commission. BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND & PUBLIC HEARING - 4/27/99 URC BLJ EXPRESSED CONCERN ABOUT F-1 BECAUSE IT IS A PRIVATE ROAD SUBDIVISION. 1. First reading of an ordinance to rezone 53.125 acres from AG-3 to PRD to construct a planned residential community located in the 7600 block of Token Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District upon the petition of Grindstone Engineering. 2. First reading of an ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit to replace an existing 30 foot pole with an 80 foot monopole and replace an existing building, located .4 mile north of intersection of Bent Mountain Road and Airpoint Drive, Windsor Hills Magisterial District upon the petition of US Cellular. T READING OF ORDINANCES 1. First reading of an ordinance to adopt minor amendments to the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) HOM MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND AND PUBLIC HEARING- 4/27/99 WORK SESSION SET FOR 4/13199 OR 4/27/99 URC H. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Second Reading of an ordinance approving the exercise of an option to purchase agreement with Salem Office Supply, Inc., for property located at 400 East Main Street, across from the Roanoke County Courthouse, in Salem, Virginia. (John Chambliss, Assistant Administrator) DISCUSSION IN EXECUTIVE SESSION 0-032399-2 FFH MOTION TO ADOPT ORD AFTER EXECUTIVE SESSION AYES-HOM,FFH,HCN NAYS-JPM,BLJ 2. Second reading of ordinance declaring a parcel of real estate to be surplus and accepting an offer for the sale of same; namely the Penn Forest Boulevard well lot. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 0-032399-3 HOM MOTION TO ADOPT ORD AND ACCEPT OFFER OF DAVID HILL FOR 23 600 URC 3. Second reading of ordinance authorizing the conveyance of a 3 37.86 acre parcel of real estate located in the City of Salem known as the Lloyd property. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) DISCUSSED IN EXECUTIVE SESSION NO ACTION TAKEN 4. Second reading of ordinance authorizing the construction of and financing for a Local Public Works Improvement Project - Little Brushy Mountain water Project. (Gary Robertson, Utility Director) 0-032399-4 BLJ MOTION TO ADOPT ORD AYES-HOM,HCN,BLJ NAYS-J PM ABSTAIN-FFH I. APPOINTMENTS 1. League of Older Americans -Advisory Council JPM ASKED MHA TO CONTACT THELMA IHRIG 2. Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission 3. Commission for Senior and Physically Challenged Citizens HOM NOMINATED MAUREEN WOODS AND CECIL PRILLAMAN - CONFIRMED ON CONSENT AGENDA. J. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. R-032399-5 4 BLJ MOTION TO ADOPT CONSENT RESO U RC 1. Approval of Minutes -February 23, 1999 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Commission for Senior and Physically Challenged Citizens A-032399- .5.a 3. Donation of a storm drainage easement on property owned by Samuel Reid and Dorothy Stevens. A-032399-5.b 4. Resolution of support for a Virginia Trails Grant for a Greenway at Green Hill Park. R-032399-5.c 5. Appropriation of Compensation Board reimbursement for additional capital purchase for the Commonwealth Attorney's Office. A-032399-5.d 6. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Meadow Creek Road Extension. A-032399-5.e 7. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Canterbury Park, Section 13. A-032399-5.f 8. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Grove Park, Section 1 and 2 off site sewer. A-032399-5.a 9. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Mountain Meadow Estates. A-032399-5. h 10. Acceptance of water facilities serving Valley Gateway. 5 A-032399-5.1 11. Resolution on behalf of Catawba Hospital requesting that the Department of Corrections allow the use of inmate labor on various government projects. R-032399-5. i 12. Acceptance of sanitary sewer facilities serving Orchard Park, Section 1. A-032399-5.k 13. Acceptance of sanitary sewer facilities serving Orchard Park, Section 2. A-032399-5.1 K. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS WORK SESSION ON ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS - 4/13/99 OR 4/27/99 L. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS NONE M. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS NONE N. REPORTS HOM MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE-UW 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 6 4. Future School Capital Reserve 5. Statement of Expenditures and Revenues for the month ended February 28, 1999 6. Notice of receipt of recreational access grant for South County Park. 7. Report of approved changes to the Secondary System of State Highways as of February 1999. 8. Statement of Treasurer's Accountability per Investments and Portfolio Policy, as of February 28, 1999. 9. Proclamation signed by the Chairman 10. Accounts Paid -February 1999 EXECUTIVE SESSION BLJ MOTION TO GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION AT 3:30 P.M. HCN ANNOUNCED HE WOULD ABSTAIN FROM ANY DISCUSSION OF THE SALE OF THE LLOYD PROPERTY. CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION R-032399-6 BLJ MOTION TO RETURN TO OPEN SESSION AT 4:02 AND ADOPT CERTIFICATION RESO. - URC O. FUNDING REQUESTS FROM HUMAN SERVICES, SOCIAL SERVICES, CULTURAL AND TOURISM AGENCIES. (4:00 P.M.) 43 AGENCIES REQUESTED FUNDING P. WORK SESSIONS (4TH FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM) NONE MICHAEL PACE, ATTORNEY FOR TRITON PCS, REQUESTED CONTINUANCE OF ITEM S-6 UNTIL APRIL 27 1999 IN ORDER TO MEET WITH THE COMMUNITY TO RESOLVE ISSUES OF CONCERN. BLJ RULED THAT MOTION TO CONTINUE WOULD BE TAKEN UP AT EVENING SESSION. Q. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (7) actual or probable litigation, condemnation proceedings for public road - Wachovia Bank; 2.1-344 A (7) probable litigation, Akers; (3)disposition of public property, Lloyd Property; (7) probable litigation, Woods End School site BLJ MOTION TO GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION AT 6:20 P.M. URC EVENING SESSION (7:00 P.M~ R. CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION R-032399-7 BLJ MOTION TO RETURN TO OPEN SESSION AND ADOPT CERTIFICATION RESO -URC S. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Second reading of an ordinance to rezone approximately 10 acres from R-2 and C-2 conditional to C-2 conditional for retail sales and obtain a Special Use Permit for fast food restaurants and drive-thrus, located in the vicinity of Brambleton Avenue (Route 221) and Electric Road (Route 419), Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Springwood Associates LLC. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) 0-032399-8 HOM MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC 2 CITIZENS SPOKE 2. Second reading of an ordinance authorizing a Special Use s Permit to construct mini warehouses, located in the 7200 block of Barrens Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Vaughn Wilburn. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) 0-032399-9 BLJ MOTION TO ADOPT ORD WITH BUFFERING AND SCREENING CONDITION AMENDED. URC 3. Second reading of an ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to operate a used automobile dealership, located at 7650 Williamson Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Hash Investments LLC. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) 0-032399-10 BLJ MOTION TO DENY ORD URC 4. Second reading of an ordinance to rezone 14.7 acres from AG-1 to R-1 to construct single family detached residences, located on the west side of Wildwood Road, north of 1-81, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Wildwood Development Inc. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) 0-032399-11 FFH MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC 5. Second reading of ordinance to rezone 11.66 acres from C-2 conditional to C-2 conditional to amend the existing condition and obtain a Special Use Permit to construct a 160 foot cellular monopole tower, located at 925 North Electric Road, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Triton PCS (Pinkerton Chevrolet). (Terry Harrington, County Planner) 0-032399-12 FFH MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC 6. Second reading of ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to construct a 120 foot cellular monopole tower, located at 1887 Electric Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the petition of Triton PCS (Good Shepherd Church). (Terry 9 Harrington, County Planner) PUBLIC HEARING HELD AND PETITIONER SPOKE 5 CITIZENS SPOKE JPM MOTION TO CONTINUE TO APRIL 271999 BLJ REQUESTED STAFF TO CONTACT AN EXPERT IN ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE TECHNOLOGY TO DISCUSS CONCERNS WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD. URC 7. Reconsideration of an Ordinance to rezone 11.93 acres from AG-3 to AR and obtain a Special Use Permit to allow a 9-hole golf course, located in the 2600 block of Rutrough Road, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of Randall Wayne Brown. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) 0-032399-13 HCN MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC 8. Second reading of ordinance to vacate as public right-of-way a portion of Garman Road recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 51, located in the Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Roanoke County and Kroger Company. (Arnold Covey, Director of Community Development) 0-032399-14 FFH MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC 9. Second reading of ordinance to vacate as public rights-of-way Washington Road recorded in Plat Book 1, page 363, Pinkard Court Subdivision in the Cave Spring Magisterial District upon the petition of Lowe's Corporation. (Arnold Covey, Director of Community Development) 0-032399-15 HOM MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC io 10. Second reading of ordinance to vacate a portion of a 15-foot drainage easement on plat showing section no. 1, Edgemont of Vinton, plat book 16, pg 41, and further shown on lot 5, block 3, section 2, Edgemont of Vinton, Plat Book 18, page 130, and revised plat of section 2, Edgemont of Vinton, Plat Book 18, page 171, in the Vinton Magisterial District (tax map no. 61.02-7- 1). (Arnold Covey, Director of Community Development) 0-032399-16 HCN MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC 11. Second reading of an ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit to construct a high school, located on the west side of Brambleton Avenue, west of Pleasant Hill Drive, south of Farmington Drive, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the petition of Roanoke County School Board. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) 0-032399-17 JPM MOTION TO ADOPT ORD WITH CHANGE TO CONDITION #1 AND DELETION OF CONDITIONS #2 AND #7 AYES-JPM,HOM,FFH,BLJ NAYS-HCN 30 CITIZENS SPOKE T. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS Supervisor McNamara• (1) Thanked the School Board and staff for their work on Phase I of the school construction projects (2) Has requested a report on the road improvements traffic light and crossing guards at Hidden Valley Junior High School Supervisor Johnson: (1) Advised he had responded with at least 15 letters to those involved in letter writina_ campaign on Rising Star Camp Noted that the Board denied a Special Use Permit for the camp but the petitioner built the complex in violation of the County Code Asked ECH to contact Chris Pollack and he and ECH will work with Mr Pollack (2) ii Dedication of the RR Donnelley Nature Trail will be April 12 and he will be out of town and unable to attend. Supervisor Harrison• (1) Announced that the Glenvar boys basketball team won the state championship and asked MHA to set up a recognition for the team at a meeting. U. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS NONE V. ADJOURNMENT BLJ ADJOURNED AT 10:56 P.M. is (LOAN ~. r~xr of na ec~ Rmr~ F F /~ ' 9 ~ ~ a ~~~~ ~~ ~"~kY~.~.~ r 38 ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA MARCH 23, 1999 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. The meetings are broadcast live on RVTV, Channel 3, and will be rebroadcast on Thursdays at 7 P.M. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement in order to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings or other programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County, please contact the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772-2005. We request that you provide at least 48-hours notice so that proper arrangements may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call 2. Invocation: The Reverend William T. Ross Vinton Baptist Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS D. BRIEFINGS E. NEW BUSINESS i ® Recycled Paper F. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA: Approval of these items does not indicate support for, or judge the merits of, the requested zoning actions but satisfies procedural requirements and schedules the Public Hearings which will be held after recommendation by the Planning Commission. 1. First reading of an ordinance to rezone 53.125 acres from AG-3 to PRD to construct a planned residential community located in the 7600 block of Token Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District upon the petition of Grindstone Engineering. 2. First reading of an ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit to replace an existing 30 foot pole with an 80 foot monopole and replace an existing building, located .4 mile north of intersection of Bent Mountain Road and Airpoint Drive, Windsor Hills Magisterial District upon the petition of US Cellular. G. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. First reading of an ordinance to adopt minor amendments to the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) H. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Second Reading of an ordinance approving the exercise of an option to purchase agreement with Salem Office Supply, Inc., for property located at 400 East Main Street, across from the Roanoke County Courthouse, in Salem, Virginia. (John Chambliss, Assistant Administrator) 2. Second reading of ordinance declaring a parcel of real estate to be surplus and accepting an offer for the sale of same; namely the Penn Forest Boulevard well lot. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 3. Second reading of ordinance authorizing the conveyance of a 37.86 acre parcel of real estate located in the City of Salem known as the Lloyd property. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) a 4. Second reading of ordinance authorizing the construction of and financing for a Local Public Works Improvement Project - Little Brushy Mountain water Project. (Gary Robertson, Utility Director) I. APPOINTMENTS 1. League of Older Americans -Advisory Council 2. Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission 3. Commission for Senior and Physically Challenged Citizens J. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Approval of Minutes -February 23, 1999 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Commission for Senior and Physically Challenged Citizens 3. Donation of a storm drainage easement on property owned by Samuel Reid and Dorothy Stevens. 4. Resolution of support for a Virginia Trails Grant for a Greenway at Green Hill Park. 5. Appropriation of Compensation Board reimbursement for additional capital purchase for the Commonwealth Attorney's Office. 6. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Meadow Creek Road Extension. 3 7. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Canterbury Park, Section 13. 8. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Grove Park, Section 1 and 2 off site sewer. 9. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Mountain Meadow Estates. 10. Acceptance of water facilities serving Valley Gateway. 11. Resolution on behalf of Catawba Hospital requesting that the Department of Corrections allow the use of inmate labor on various government projects. 12. Acceptance of sanitary sewer facilities serving Orchard Park, Section 1. 13. Acceptance of sanitary sewer facilities serving Orchard Park, Section 2. K. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS L. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS M. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS N. REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Future School Capital Reserve 5. Statement of Expenditures and Revenues for the month ended February 28, 1999 4 6. Notice of receipt of recreational access grant for South County Park. 7. Report of approved changes to the Secondary System of State Highways as of February 1999. 8. Statement of Treasurer's Accountability per Investments and Portfolio Policy, as of February 28, 1999. 9. Proclamation signed by the Chairman 10. Accounts Paid -February 1999 O. FUNDING REQUESTS FROM HUMAN SERVICES, SOCIAL SERVICES, CULTURAL AND TOURISM AGENCIES. (4:00 P.M.) P. WORK SESSIONS (4TH FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM) Q. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (7) actual or probable litigation, condemnation proceedings for public road - Wachovia Bank; 2.1-344 A (7) probable litigation, Akers. EVENING SESSION (7:00 P.M.) R. CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION S. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Second reading of an ordinance to rezone approximately 10 acres from R-2 and C-2 conditional to C-2 conditional for retail sales and obtain a Special Use Permit for fast food restaurants and drive-thrus, located in the vicinity of Brambleton Avenue (Route 221) and Electric Road (Route 419), Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Springwood Associates LLC. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) 2. Second reading of an ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to construct mini warehouses, located in the 7200 block of Barrens Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Vaughn Wilburn. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) 5 3. Second reading of an ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to operate a used automobile dealership, located at 7650 Williamson Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Hash Investments LLC. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) 4. Second reading of an ordinance to rezone 14.7 acres from AG-1 to R-1 to construct single family detached residences, located on the west side of Wildwood Road, north of 1-81, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Wildwood Development Inc. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) 5. Second reading of ordinance to rezone 11.66 acres from C-2 conditional to C-2 conditional to amend the existing condition and obtain a Special Use Permit to construct a 160 foot cellular monopole tower, located at 925 North Electric Road, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Triton PCS (Pinkerton Chevrolet). (Terry Harrington, County Planner) 6. Second reading of ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to construct a 120 foot cellular monopole tower, located at 1887 Electric Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the petition of Triton PCS (Good Shepherd Church). (Terry Harrington, County Planner) 7. Reconsideration of an Ordinance to rezone 11.93 acres from AG-3 to AR and obtain a Special Use Permit to allow a 9-hole golf course, located in the 2600 block of Rutrough Road, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of Randall Wayne Brown. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) 8. Second reading of ordinance to vacate as public right-of-way a portion of Garman Road recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 51, located in the Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Roanoke County and Kroger Company. (Arnold Covey, Director of Community Development) 9. Second reading of ordinance to vacate as public rights-of-way Washington Road recorded in Plat Book 1, page 363, Pinkard Court Subdivision in the Cave Spring Magisterial District upon the petition of Lowe's Corporation. (Arnold Covey, Director of 6 Community Development) 10. Second reading of ordinance to vacate a portion of a 15-foot drainage easement on plat showing section no. 1, Edgemont of Vinton, plat book 16, pg 41, and further shown on lot 5, block 3, section 2, Edgemont of Vinton, Plat Book 18, page 130, and revised plat of section 2, Edgemont of Vinton, Plat Book 18, page 171, in the Vinton Magisterial District (tax map no. 61.02-7- 1). (Arnold Covey, Director of Community Development) 11. Second reading of an ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit to construct a high school, located on the west side of Brambleton Avenue, west of Pleasant Hill Drive, south of Farmington Drive, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the petition of Roanoke County School Board. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) T. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS U. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS V. ADJOURNMENT AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 1999 RESOLUTION 032399-1 REQUESTING THE DELETION OF MEALS TAX RESTRICTIONS FROM FOOD TAX RELIEF BILL (HB 1601) WHEREAS, Governor Jim Gilmore's proposal to reduce the state sales tax on food did not include any change to the local meals tax; and WHEREAS, HB 1601 was amended to prohibit localities from levying their meals tax on items that meet the definition of "food for home consumption" as defined in the Food Stamp Act; and WHEREAS, the meals tax restriction in HB 1601 will reduce by approximately $115,000 the meals tax revenue collected by the County of Roanoke; and WHEREAS, the budget passed by the 1999 General Assembly includes additional money for education but includes both a maintenance of effort requirement and a local match requirement, which means that many localities will have to spend additional local funds to benefit from the new state funding; and WHEREAS, the 1999 General Assembly approved funds for asix-percent teacher salary increase, provided that a locality can meet its local match requirement; and WHEREAS, local governments are the providers of essential services in their communities, and reducing existing revenues adversely affects their ability to maintain services; and WHEREAS, local governments routinely employ a variety of measures to limit the tax burden in their communities; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County of Roanoke requests that Governor Jim Gilmore amend HB 1601 to strike all references to the local meals tax. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: .~ Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File W. Brent Robertson, Budget Manager Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney The Honorable R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue The Honorable James S. Gilmore, III, Governor, Comomnwealth of Virginia Roanoke Valley Legislative Delegation ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 23, 1999 AGENDA Item: Resolution Requesting the Deletion of Meals Tax Restrictions from Food Tax Relief Bill (HB 1601) COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: //A SLT1yIMARY OF INFORMATION: HB 1601 repeals two-cents of the state sales tax on food, and also prevents localities from levying the meals tax on food that meets the definition of "food for home consumption" as defined in the Food Stamp Act. If this language is left in the bill, localities will not be able to collect meals tax on items such as cold food or sandwiches or beverages sold in convenience stores, grocery stores, or other types of restaurants selling these items. VML has asked localities to pass a resolution asking the governor to strike this language before he signs the bill anytime between now and March 29, 1999. If passed, this resolution would be faxed to the governor's office immediately. FISCAL IlVIl'ACT: The Commissioner of Revenue has estimated the fiscal impact of this amended language is to reduce Roanoke County's meals tax approximately $115,000. Total meals tax for Roanoke County is $2,230,000. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approving the attached resolution asking Governor Gilmore to strike all references to local meals tax before signing HB 1601. SUBMITTED BY: Brent Robertson APPROVED: ~~ Elmer C. Hodge Budget Manager County Administrator .. L= ." / AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGII~IIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 1999 RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE DELETION OF MEALS TAX RESTRICTIONS FROM FOOD TAX RELIEF BILL (HB 1601) WHEREAS, Governor Jim Gilmore's proposal to reduce the state sales tax on food did not include any change to the local meals tax; and WHEREAS, HB 1601 was amended to prohibit localities from levying their meals tax on items that meet the definition of "food for home consumption" as defined in the Food Stamp Act; and WHEREAS, the meals tax restriction in HB 1601 will reduce by approximately $115,000 the meals tax revenue collected by the County of Roanoke; and WHEREAS, the budget passed by the 1999 General Assembly includes additional money for education but includes both a maintenance of effort requirement and a local match requirement, which means that many localities will have to spend additional local funds to benefit from the new state funding; and WHEREAS, the 1999 General Assembly approved funds for asix-percent teacher salary increase, provided that a locality can meet its local match requirement; and WHEREAS, local governments are the providers of essential services in their communities, and reducing existing revenues adversely affects their ability to maintain services; and WHEREAS, local governments routinely employ a variety of measures to limit the tax burden in their communities; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County of Roanoke requests that Governor Jim Gilmore amend HB 1601 to strike all references to the local meals tax. U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\GENERAL\HB 1601.RES ACTION N0. ITEM NO. ~"` ~- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 23, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: Requests for Public Hearing and First Reading for Rezoning Ordinances Consent Agenda COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: The first reading on these ordinances is accomplished by adoption of these ordinances in the manner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions, rather approval satisfies the procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public hearing and second reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public hearing on these ordinances is scheduled for April 27, 1999. The titles of these ordinances are as follows: 1) An ordinance to rezone 53.125 acres from AG-3 to PRD to construct a planned residential community, located in the 7600 block of Token Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Grindstone Engineering. 2) An ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit to replace an existing 30 foot pole with an 80 foot monopole and replace an existing building, located .4 mile north of intersection of Bent Mountain Road and Airpoint Drive, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the petition of US Cellular. MAPS ARE ATTACHED; MORE DETAILED INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE IN THE CLERK'S OFFICE. r STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: ~-i a (1) That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of these rezoning ordinances for the purpose of scheduling the second reading and public hearing for A rp it 27. 1999. (2) That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth as Items 1 through 2, inclusive, and that the Clerk is authorized and directed where required bylaw to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action. Respectfully submitted, Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Action Motion by es Abs Harrison Johnson McNamara Minnix Nickens ' ' ~ ~, `5' COUNTY GF RGANOKE • 4 t `i ~g L DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZOC\IING a ,~ ^ ~ 2; ~ 7~v, Bernard Dr. P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 _ (~~0' 772-2068 Fr,X (`='~0) / ; ?-21 08 or staff use only date received:- r-- iv ed ~~: res.e r ~ f ~j applica ion gee: 1 Pr';8 r1 date. z; % ~-' placards issued: 805 datz: Case i~lumoer. ~ ,,,. ~. 1 .-....~ . ,; . .. .:..,.... . .~~ . z:~ :. ::::::::::::::::... . ~hect< *ypa of application filed (cneck ail that apply): r REZONING ^ SPECIA.L USA ~ VARIANCE , A.pplicant's name: r,~Zru~7-~~.i~ r'Z'~i's.`='z-'e3`"`'~ Phone: ~~5-~~`~~ Address: ° G, t3o~c ~~0'3~ ~~~u= ~ ~°~ Zip Code: ~,~~~ Owner's name: l~+~y~§ ~ s'~~.+~~~~ ~~'~~~~ Phone: g~S-~~1:>~ Address: t~,r, ~ G~2~~'t"r4vcQa= T~tt~~ ~ 5~,.,1 ~~, UeA Zip Code: z~~~~ Location of property: Tax Map Number: lU~.bG -Z -' ~ ~ ~, ~Z-'~ ~~ ~tu4-ve~C Ce~.r-cam'`!' ,,,,, 3 ~ ~ Go=s= i ~~CC.tj I~ . 4 7 ~.1 '~ L ~`~iagisteral District: ~~4c.Cr 5+r~~'iivC~ ~~- ~iG~''~N' ~'~ Community Planning Area: Gc.:,4 f2~'PdZ,~C;t~ Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: ~?-~-~ 12~' acres Existing Land Use: t-r~~5, sq.ft. :::.:...::::.::.:::::..::.::...:.:.:...:.:.:.:.:...:.:.:.:.:.:....:...: :............ ;::::::.:::..: :.:.. ,: f::~ : r p~^. :'.~ ~ Proposed Zoning: 4~~~ ~r• sra,7 Use-Gn~y ~ Proposed Land Use: ~ ~,~~~ ~ ~r~~y~-~'` ~~4T ~-~ ~~t~l;.+~tgs_. U5z -YPe~ Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES ''''' NO IR NO, A VARiA.NCE IS REQUIRED PIRST. ~i i`~1O Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for t~~e requested Use Type? YES " IF N0, A ~lARLANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO Variance pf Section(s} of the Roanoke County Zoning Qrdinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. A.PPLIC,ATIGN WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE (TENS ARE MESSING OR INCOMPLETE. ass v ws v ars r-v~ Consultation 8 1 i2" x 1 1" concept plan i ~ Application fee Application ~"<~ Metes and bounds description ;««, Proffers, if applicable Justification '~'t Water and saver application Adjoining property owners I hereoy cer*ify that 1 am either the owner or the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and cansen~o~the~~IO~vner. Owner's Signature: . JUS~"~F1CA~iC~~J FAR TAE R~Z~~11~1G REQUEST ~~ This proposal expresses the flexibility not found through conventional zoning. It will permit the development of a high quality residential community in an area ~Nhere terrain and topography prohibit the construction of state standard roads. The very low density and Large amount of open space will provide residential opportunities which can not be developed under traditional zoning standards due to cost of infrastructure development. This flexibility is the essential purpose of a Planned Residential District. By preserving the rural character through very low density housing and a large open space component, this project conforms and exemplifies the general policies for the Clearbrook Planning Area. This project cannot be seen from the Blue Ridge Parkway. By maintaining large lots with minimal tree removal, any point at which the project can be viewed from in the future will be seen as a very !ow intensity development. Currently there are only two of the eight proposed lots which can be seen from any public road and that is at a viewing distance of approximately 1I4 mile and only for a short time while driving on SR 613. The impacts to the property and it's surrounds are quite low due to the !ow intensity of development proposed. Public Service impacts are also quite low. Water and sewer will be provided by individual systems (we11 & septic), there wilt be no additional public roads for maintenance, and due to the limited number of homes and residents the impacts to schools, parks and recreation needs, and the fire and rescue will be quite nominal. c~ G -i--~ .~ .(, / ^~^ } ~.l~ 4~:.` £, 7 I ~ .ice' O ~J ,, _ ~~~ _ , ~ W r it r ~~~ ~' ti' ~~' ,~~ ~"- ~~, ~~cy..~'~ O ICI -I ~`~'4 ~ ~ ~~ ~~ r ~~ _ f -- I t s I ~r ~ l r I r~-~ ~... q~ ~t7'• -~- !/iii\~ •---~,~ r ~ ~~ ~~ CO. `7- ~~ v~ ~ ' _ ry../f~ ~+~ y,~.~ r, fl~r~. ~s^[ ~ t- (' !~. ~ \: ~I~ 5".. 'i"'91 ,r ~ xr r` j ~ w. ~r ~ ~1. ~ r ~„ T T ~ }'ll~ i" gib.'-1- ~ \~ ,~ -~ '~, r ~.~ ~' 5~ ~ y, r ` , ~ ~. ~ g„r ~, 7 ~ ~ti £.1 ~~. ti y, i 1 ~~ i- ~.~ ~ ~~ I ~ - ~ ,~ }} 7 ,' .. ,.,~. y r j--f ~{ ~ ' ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ i l 1 I9 r^~ 11~~ ".,~`~ rte-- ~~ ~ Il~t i ~.=' ';~ _. r ,- y i r 4 - 7~~ ~$ t ~~ ~~ 0 c~ c~ SR 68~• T~kan Read N ' Yth __________, Proposed Subdivision Lines 300F~et Existing Lot Lines `~, Existing Gravel Road, proposed multi-family driveway, see attached road plans - Y vr-,IIIIIIfP •-••~. Community Trail Easement, 10 ft. F- ~ Grindstone Engineering P.O.Box 20034 Roanoke, VA 24018 989-8849 Z3 C6 LL' C''7 r CS) Ff ~ .: ~ ~~ - ~° ~~` x ~. r .. o '~ ~.f ~('`~{1 //~~ ~ ~, ~p~Ar 'r ~y~) {~]~,~,°','L~` ~ 'Ck 4T .(F '" •. s YIM •f .~' ~ ,~ r.. 4 CG ~ ~J ~ 4;. ^ R ~+ ~M V2~ ~~d°...~L11~~~ ~'K~VF - _, .a ~~ :k `f W F r }~`, n, `a . -H ! N -~ 13 w ;.yi Y~ A yy . ~ ~ r t ~ tl•3.1 acre~~ , ad~t~ ~ .~«... - .. ... . a a t Nf ~' , ~~ .yid. ~`,- 3 ,~ ~ ~~' ~~. ,,k~.~ '~~ .. . ~ >.~i' ., r,. .;,~,~.,,~~, a ~~„~ . ~ ,t ~~ ~ N•~~9.,~1~ Pad ~Y r r ~~ ~ ,p.. f ' 3 3 cr '~ < ~' ~ A L -a. ~ .~ ouse a d ~ + f"~'' ~,..~' „r'T° ' /~ $ 3CI'2S ? e ` ` .~ { -M ~r r. ~, .V'.,,,.. , "~ -~ ..~,~ .xa. s "'a, error . r~~~_ , ~3~ ~,'yr:.v'dr'~ ~.; • ~„ f '"''r ~. ~ ~ ~ i~ 7aCr63 ~, bi. ~ "t~ r 7 _ x`~ r `~ .r y~ ~ ~ oUS2 p~'d +1 l~k ~ ,~ ~~ .. F k Wy ~, P •, a t)~a~, 2"5 V F r '~ ~~ s P 3 ~, ,~ ~ 4' s 4 E~ac~`es remati~el'2r f ~, r •1~ ~s ~ ' 7~ ~"L ~ .9 ~ ~ ~+z s-~'Y /~ ,."g„„ t'rvtl3w~h.'.,,~ y'. f dd> ~ k '+e, h~ ~ n~"r yet .Y -may ,~°. ,X e4/ ~' ^~ . ~' .l.h f 'd 5 ~ '~ '.`~ e ~ ,~ .°. _ 'Cry , ~N L , y.. - ~ ~• ~ • ~ , ~ _~ ~ ~ry .~ ~ ,, franklm County ~'' 3.l } ~ ~ • ' '' ,.,_'" .; .:M ,~ ~ ~`= ~ . Roanoke County ~~ ' ~ ' ~` `~~ h ,~+ + ~ .. ~ w = '' . as '' r ~" '.g ~ .a ~' '~ ,'' ~ _ ~ ~, ~ ~ r ., ~ LMT ~ '. ~. ~ I 3 u ,: '' . ~ f ~ f b ~,'Y ~ F ~ .: ~ T ~ L4. a "°11 ' r. t '. f n ~ ,• r ~ ~~ Grindstone En ineerin 9 9 __________, Proposed Subdivision Lines ~~ P.O.Box 20034 Existing Lot Lines Roanoke, VA 2401$ 989-8849 ~.:~~ Existing Gravel Road, proposed mufti-family driveway, see attached road plans r „ •-••~ "~ Community Trail Easement, 10 tt. Aoalication for the Meagher Planned Residential Deveaopment (PRD) 1 of 2 1. Legal Description & Plat ~~ See attachment #1 for deed description and plat of properties to be included in the PRD dis#rict. Also see this attachment for adjoining landowners and associated tax map numbers. 2. Existing zoning, land use and ownership The existing zoning of the properties is AG-3, agricultural preserve. The current land use is in undeveloped woodlands, being accessed by an existing road as shown on the land use plan map. The current ownership is by the applicants, Hugh & Bridgett Meagher. All adjoining parcels are zoned AG-3 and the landuse is undeveloped woodlands. 3. General statement objectives The main objective to be accomplished by the proposed PRD district is an eight lot single family detached residential development which fits the topography of the site and will create a high quality forested estate living environment for it's residents. The residential developments will emphasize minimal traditional lawns and tree removal through specific site planned pads and some binding architectural restrictions (see note at end). A natural living environment with aesthetically pleasing viewscapes by utilizing underground utilities will be thematic to the development. 4. Description & analysis of existing site The existing site conditions will offer some of the most dramatic views of both urban and rural Roanoke County for residential living available. The site is located only 4.5 miles from Penn Forest Elementary and the Starkey Park Recreational facilities. The topography ofthe site is very limiting to large scale residential or commercial development. For these reasons the proposed PRD is the best use for the property and will add to the quality and character of residential development in Roanoke County. There are no known archeological, historical, water course, floodplain, or other unique features of this forested property. 5. Land Use Plan The proposed land use is residential with the remaining parcel to remain in forestiand preserve. Site development regulations with regard to setback, height, building coverage, lot coverage, and density requirements are to be the same as R-1, although with 3~- acre lots coverage and density will not come into play. The cost and service needs of such a limited development prohibit the development of a road facility suitable for public dedication on this topographically challenging terrain. The remainder of the proposed lots, served by the existing private road, are to be regulated through site specific planned pads and some binding architectural restrictions. By uniquely designing each house pad to fit the specific terrain, a high quality forested estate residential living experience can be created, while maintaining the convenience of close proximity to the urban setting. Each of these lots will incorporate a professionally prepared site plan, which will detail the site development requirements. See attached example which has been developed on pad 7. 6. Circulation plan The existing road provides access to ail proposed lots and is suitable to accommodate passage of fire trucks, emergency vehicles, as well as delivery and construction trucks. Estimated average daily traffic is less than 50, and can easily be accommodated by the existing road. The road and it's maintenance is proposed to remain private and funded through a homeowner's association. The design vehicle for the low traffic volume road is a tractor semi-trailer, providing curve widening and intervisible turnouts. This road can not be upgraded to A olication for the Meagher Planned Residential Development (PRD) 2 of 2 state standards for reason ofithe terrain and topography. See attached set of road plans. Suitable turnarounds will be constructed at each lot's pad entrance. ,,,, 7. Public Services & Utilities Each lot is to be served by individual well and septic systems, Electricity and telephone will be provided through a system of underground corridors to minimize the aesthetic impacts and maintenance of overhead lines in a forested environment. Underground utility corridors are to be located along the existing road corridor when practical. 8. ©pen Space Plan A trail system has been identified to promote outdoor recreation and community spirit amongst the property owners. A ten foot easement for this trail system will be incorporated into the site plan which connects the lots with the large lot in common. The large 24.8 acre forestland preserve will be held in common ownership by a homeowners association. Given the lot size and the large forestland preserve lot ample open space (>5D%) on the site will be maintained. 9. Architectural & Community design guidelines The residential developments will emphasize minimal traditional lawns and tree removal through specific site planned pads and some binding architectural restrictions. A natural living environment with aesthetically pleasing viewscapes by utilizing underground utilities will be thematic to the development. 10. development schedule Developments will be scheduled as the marketing of the individual (ots progresses. Architectural Restrictions to be incorporated by deed descriptions. 1) Residences limited to single family detached with minimum finished gross floor area of 20D0 square feet. 2) Residences will be located within the planned pad area established for each lot. 3) No temporary structures shall be used as residence at any time. 4) A professional master site plan will be developed for each residence prior to any construction activities. The site plan will serve as the guide to minimize tree removal and traditional lawn space, as well as making the residence and it's associated developments fit efficiently and aesthetically onto each lot. Road Plans and Specifications for the construction of Meagher Parkv~Jay Table of Contents: 1) Schedule of Items 2) Specifications 3} Typical Cross Sections 4) Plans, sheet 1 plan view sheet 2 profile view Design Notes: This road has been designed to accommodate a tractor semi-traiier combination with an overall length of 6o feet. A tractorwheelbase of 15 feet and a trailer wheelbase of 35 feet was used to compute off tracking and the required curve widths. Full aggregate base surfacing has been specified to an approximate depth of 4 inches. Meagher Parkway Schedule of Items: Estimated Quantity 1} Clearing and Grubbing 2.8 acres 2} Excavation 27.50 stations 3) Crushed Aggregate 200 tons #3 100 tons #57 100 tons #25 subtotal 400 tons 4) 15" Culvert Pipe 200 ft 5) Seeding 1.8 acres Construction Specifications; Clearing and Grubbing; All timber within the clearing limits will be felled and utilized as commercial timber products sold off site to the extent practicable. All unmerchantable timber within clearing limits shall be lopped and scattered outside of clearing limits to lay within two feet of the ground. All stumps within the clearing limits will be grubbed unless within embankment and more than threes feet horizontal from the finished road edge. All stumps from trees less than 12 inches in diameter shall be scattered a~zd buried in the toe of the road fill with a minimum of one foot fill cover no closer than three feet horizontal from the finished road edge, as shown in typical section. Stumps from trees 12 inches in diameter and greater will be buried on site at locations and with methods approved by the owner during construction. ~f Excavation: All cut material shall be pushed with a dozer to locations where the road template conforms essentially to ~~ that show on the drawings. Cut and Fill is staked at centerline stations and on Cut Side of Roadway. Fill material shall be free of debris and machine compacted in layers so as to minimize settiement. Crushed Aggregate: Crushed aggregate will be from a VDOT approved quarry and in compliance with VDOT specifications. Aggregates designated as VA #1, VA #3, VA #57, VA #68, and VA #26 (crusher run) shall be placed at locations as agreed. Certified weight tickets will be required to verify quantity and types of aggregate placement. Culvert Pipe: Culverts will be installed according to manufacturers recommendations. Location of installation is shown on the plans, and may be adjusted during construction. Culvert pipe material will consist of Advanced Drainage Systems N-12 pipe 15" di~vnaeter or equivalent. Beading: Seeding will consist of seed bed preparation, lime application, fertilizer application, seed mixture application, and mulching. Application may be either dry or wet (hydromulch). The following table outlines the rates of application: Lime 2000#j acre Fertilizer 10/10/10 600#/ acre ,_ Kentucky 31 Fescue 50#/ acre Red Top Grass 2#/ acre Annual Ryegrass 20#/ acre Mulch 2000#/acre straw or 1500# wood fiber (hydomulch) Variations in the application rates may be agreed upon, the emphasis is on establishing a strong vegetative cover on all exposed soils outside of the roadway. ~ ~ ~ c o ~ ~ -o a~ ~ ~ ~ O Q> ~ '` ~ ~ ~ C p,~ ~ ~ '~ ~MN O .-L ~ ~ N 6 N ~ `' ~-'-COQ ~ a 6~ •Q~ o ~ a~o> CN ~ ~•- ~+-- o N r (U ~~ ~ _ L O N X o ~ `n`*- L a ~ ~ O ~ O n-v o-° °~ ~ ~a - a ~ p ~~O 0 ~- ~c a°~~ ~ ~ C~CL~ 7 `- ~ O -~' "B a O ~(n ~ ~.N ~ d ~ ~ p "- p L O ~~ N O TJ O N ~ L ' + + ~ ~ '6 0 o 0 -- ~ _ -p C ~ -p 6 ~ U C ~'' I (n ~E ~c~ ~ ~v o -~ eo - L Z Q 3 C7 3 ~ 0~3 Q+~_-,~ c O ~ O ''_' U Q~ ~ C U N ~ O ' ~ ~ - . . U + O ~ ~ L~ L (n Q~ ~ lT C O U C O ~ d ~ ~ f- _ o m ~ ~ ~ v ~ ~ 0 0 ~ I- L ~- a 0 0 ~ > N ~ a 0 0 ~ -- a m -Y ~ o ~- ~ • ~ m a+ a U ~ ~ o al N V7 ' `~ C m y O ) I ~ ~ ~ ~ U1 p ~ ._ .~ ~+ .. C UI N ~ ..r ~ C ~ ~i > O o U J ~ ~ U ~ N a.. .-Y N O ~ ~- ~ Y~ O~ O ~ ~ ~~ In y G = In N N d - m m v~ w ~ v~ m A ~ / o v O ~ ~ U O a 0 r F~ ti~.J 7.48 Ac.(D) ~/~ ~_, ~ _ . ,~~ _ ,¢F ~,,,~' { 3.00 Ac. F 6. S 0 Ac. D) 5.08. Ac.~C} BODC%$Z _ ., . ;: ~ . Church ~: ~ -~-s _ a ~r ~ ~,~ ~~ ~ £ . ,~ . ~ 50.00 Ac. `- a .i? ~~~F~l ~~ 3 assessed irj =rank/r'n Ce. 3.35 Ac. ~,1 27.04 Ac. ~, ~~. ~~ ~~ 30.00 Ac.(D) 21.75 Ac.(C M~ Rt3AlYC~ C4UlET~'Y D~'P~.RT~~`NT t1.F' ~'C~M~'IV:~T'~'' Il~'~l~~a~~.~'1~'T Grin~ton~ Ez~,e~irze~ring Rezone from ~G-3 to d'R'~ ?'~ .~f~~ moo. 1 ~~. ~~-2-4 ~ ~ 42. ~ ~QU~'i ~ {~~ ~®~~~K~ GEr~T. OF PLANNING AND Z~JP'aiNG 3738 Brambleton Ave. SW P,O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 (703) 772.2068 FAX (703) 772-2030 For staff use only date racoi~sci.~+"~~ f~ :. - ~ received by:,~~ '~ ~ j ~ ~ application (e'e~ ~ ~' PC/BZ~, date: ,~ placards issued: ~ BOS data: casa Number: ' '~~~~~~"~ iiiiiiici iiii?i Sit iiiii; ii is iii`ii i4;~; i;IE"!:ii:;!; `:;iii;i;:; i;iii ii;ii i;i;iii$ii i ^ G i~;:ii ~.;iri;Et :::::::: .:: ::::::::::::: .:::::: t-f1~f:~ :~'~'~!`c~~riii?~E~E`Eiii:<ascii~iasE::isisisisisisii:isisiii:~iiiiiiiaisiiiiiii:';i:;`eiasisisiiii;iii!i;Eii;:i;ii;i~iE:i:i:iiiiiii:iii _ ~ ., Check type of app{ication filed (check all that apply}; ^ REZONING ®SPECIAL USE ^VARIANCE Applicant's name: United States Cellular Phone:603.345.4356 Address: 58 Dodge Hill Road Zip Code:03442 Bennin, ton, NH Owner's name: Ohio State Cellular Phone Company, lnc. Phone: 603.345.4356 Address: 58 Dodge Hill Road Zip Code: 03442 Bennington, NH Location ofi property: Tax lvtap Number: 103.00-1-34 &35 J Adjacent to U.S. Rt. 221 north of Magisterial Disuict: Windsor Hills Airpoint Dr Rt 1445 ., . Community Planning Area: Bent Mountain Size of parcfll {s); Existing Zoning:30' ± tall wood cellular pole and 12'x16' building 3.268 acres Existing Land Use: AG-3 (Special Use Permi#) 142.354 sq.ft. ::~:i: :;~;;; .: •, •,. ~:;; ie i;:i?:;:i;;::;,°i i is ti: i;; ~; i is i iit'•iiii ii i ~ i ii i ie i ~;;;;;: is i::: i;i:i:iii;,i;;,i;;:;,;; i::;:i i::?;?,;i,t i;,; ,.~:;.. . .A :='~~ '~f . R •,,~~ . Proposed Zan;ng: Remaining AG-3 Proposed Land Use: Replace 30' pole with 80' monopole and replace 12'x16' building rbr .Srarf uS~ only use 7ypa: with 12';<20' equipment shelter ................ . .......... Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES x NO IF N0, A VARIANCE iS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the portal meat the minimum criteria for the requested Usa Type? YES X NO IF N0, A VARIANCE 1S REQUIRED FIRST. if rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this requestl YES NIA NO :~~:: ' : if .. . . .. Variance of Section(s) N/A flf the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinanca. in order to: as the appucanon compete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED iF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. us v nn v ws v x Consultation x 8 i l2" x 1 1" concept plan x Application fee x Application x .. Metes and bounds description ~A ~ Proffers, if applicable x Justification ~ ~~ Water and sewer aopiication x Adjoining property owners (Not required) ! .hereby cartify that / am either the owner of the property or th owner's agent r contract purc,~aser and am acing with the knowled~genAA,,and c~~ons//~~nt of the owner. Owner's Signature: I~iN% ~~'"~WV~, F a` E~JGiNEER1NG February 18, 1995 .CONCEPTS ([JC. .Planning Commission of Roanoke County, Virginia Attention: Mr. Terry Harrington Roanoke County Zoning Administrator 5204 Bernard Drive, SW Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Re: Special Use Permit Application United States Cellular 80-foot Monopole Cellular Tower Sent Mountain -Windsor Hills District Tax Map # 103.00-1-34 ~ 35 Dear Mr. Harrington: ~~ Please accept this petition for a Special Use Permit allowing for the replacement of a 30-foci wood cellular pole with an 80-foot cellular monopole tower and the replacement of an existing 12'x16' building with a 12'x20' equipment shelter on the above referenced properties. On behalf of United States Cellular we request that you place this application on the agenda for consideration at the April Planning Commission meeting. Engineering Concepts at the direction ofi U.S. Cellular has undertaken and enclosed all the necessary application data for your distribution and review. A,Iso enclosed you will find a copy of the Concept Plan and visual aides that simulate the study area and visual impacts. This site is below the required formal FAQ, revie:v heights and distances as it relates to the Roanoke Regional Airport. Hopefully we have provided you with all the necessary data to facilitate Commission approval and Staff review. Should you have any questions or require any additional information, please call us directly. We look forward to the public hearing in April. Sincerely, Engineering Concepts, Inc. ~~ Bobby Wampler Project Engineer Cc: Doug Wilk - U.S. Cellular Joe Gonzales -Tristan Communications Jack Ellinwood, Project Manager - ECI Tim Nash, LS - EC1 Hai Bailey, PE -President - ECI P.O. Box 619 ~ 20 S. ROANOKE ST. m FINCASTL~. VIRGiNiA 24090 ~ 540.473. 1253 ~ FAX 473.1 254 Applicant United Slates Cellular ~-- The Planning Commission ltvill study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need ar,d justification for the change in terms of public health, salety, and general we?fpre. rlease answer the following questions as thoroughly as possiele. tJse additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes cf the Zoning ~3rdinance (Section 3G-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning t3f the applicable zoning dib63lc6 classification in the zoning ordinance. The establishment of an 80' cellular monopole facility by replacing an existing 30' pole at this location will further the purpose of the Zoning Ordinance by improving service coverage for Roanoke County cellular customers. The improvement in coverage will enhance the existing area service providing County businesses and citizens with quality, long term signal reception. The completed facilih~ will not affect approach slopes to the Roanoke Regional Airport. The proposed tower site is below the FAA permit rep/ie~;v height of 200 feet and exceeds the approach slope ~ minimums based on its horizontal position in relation to the Roanoke Regional Airport. Please explain how the project conforms tc the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke Court~j Comprehensive Plan. The land use designation for the subject property as identified within the Comprehensive plan is Rural Preserve. The impact of the proposed cellular tower replacement on adjac~rt property and the existing terrain and vegetation will not be evident. The operation of the fiacility will require only periodic maintenance after construction and throughout the life or"the facility. Because the construction is the replacement of an existing cellular pole, there will be a minimum of disturbed area and existing vegetation will be preserved. Please describe the impacts} of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts an public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parkslrecreation, and fire/rescue. The proposed tower facility is a replacement of an existing cellular pole and therefore existing vegetation on the property will remain mostly undisturbed. Given that the monopole will be a replacement to an existing pole, visual impacts from surrounding properties is minimal. There will be no impact on schools, roads, water, sewer, parks, or fire and rescue. This facility will generate traffic of a periodic nature to accomplish routine maintenance and general site upkeep. ~~ ~~ February 18, 1~~~ Jack Ellisl-urood Bnginc-erix:g Concepts, Inc, P. t). Box ~l~ ~"inCas~de, V:~ 2090 F,e; Bent Mountain Rc'~uild 'pourer Application Dear Jack: ~~ubject: Coverage Coals arad Alternatives for Bent Mountain Ohio Sy~te Ceiiular Phone Cornpan~'s Bent l~ountaI3 cell site currently provides cellular coverage for Roanoke county from Sent Mountain east along Route 22 i in the Bask Creek and Poades iViill a;.eas. in~-easing the tower height tom 3~' to 8~' will rye°t tlhe follou~~ng two goals; co-location and signal ~ ~Z'.~talr,Siei7.t. Coelocat;on: Multiple Lena:-its at'ir~is 2oca~scn ~,~iL reduc° t~~ie need for other tov~ors in tine ~-icir~i-~~, and provide incorn~ opportunities for our cor~pa_ny, Sigr_al cor:tainment: one addi~tior.~1 hei.g,~~t ~riil allo~r us tc~ do~-r~tilt our antennae and proti-ide ar better signer? contair~nent ~zt±riLn t;~e cell site's targeted cover ~c area, 'i his unprovcmcnt wit mean better ser-Tice for our customers by reducing signal ~S:L~r f~2'~I7.C~ Wl~i.~_1rI OLLr' S'~TS i~zn.'~ i hope this helps? Call me if you have any other ques~ons or problems. Sincere~y, n~ Jack Parkin par~au culku~g b21 Scuff NS~Y ='t`-U, Pzrsacc,~a, ~o+~Ca 3;so1 7E •' (8x01 ~3.99~4 FAX: (85J) ~:i-5o"78 ~~ ~""' ~~ N fIJ r' N ~~ ~ ~~ ~_~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~e ~ x ~ U tt~w f7 ~ ~ b°~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ yy D ii~ ~P ~' ~` ~ ~ I ~I ~ ' .~ I r ' ~~ 0 '~ ~i __ ~d ~ I } '~ ,}~~. r ~~ ~~ ~ F ~~, s Y ~ 'T' ~~ ~~ s~ ~~ ~L` `'., i ~~ ~~ ~ -~ ~~ v ,. _ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ j ~ R ~' ~ ~ Y~ ~ g~~~ ~~ $~~~ ~~~a~a ~~ ~~~7 ~~a~g ;~ ~~ ~ i~ N N ~~ v~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~~ ~' e -_~ ~ F ~ ~'~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~ - ~~ ~ gg 8 ~~ ~.~ g ~~~~~ ~~~ 0 0 Il a U Y~ ~~ ~~ ~fP I rirr ~~ i I. .1~~; y ~ ',t~ P 7 1 ~u ; fT [.r.. i,t w .-, wn t~ I L ~ ~N ~ 'i .,y„~ 1 ~ -~ ~. ;. ~ ~' ~ 3~~ a ~ ~° ~+ ~:+ f. ; i ~~ ~ I 1 I~ ' 1~ ;31 >~ r. `~°~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ I ` a~i' '~' ~' CAD t . ' ,,.. ~ 4 ` ' ~ [.. h - I ti l~ "~ ...a [lir'" ~t ~~~ ~~~il I ~ ~ ~ G ~ I . - l r d L~+ pia ~ ~ + yr ~ . ~. ~, ~ ~,rv `~ ~ .N,I~ i ~ + ~'~ ~ ~ t t-. (~,r7 Iir - ~. n+~s ~ np ~ ~ , y i . . ~T I ~~ Y : I ~+ r6V' -~,~ ; F _ 1 S ~ ~ x r~ F ~ s ;~ ~ ~ ~+ ~ I ~ iy ~ , . ~ ~1L~ P s "Cr~~~ ; `d f i S s, {9y~,,.p4il'n W Nib 'z i.. 3Ng~ I ~ Nq~ ~ ~41gqq 0 W N~gpppgl)` W ~~°~ " ~sd z u s 0 U 1~ ~~ ~5.~.. ... l7 <::: Z ~a.vx W ~G ~ ~ .+., O N N :c ono ;> O r ~j 0 i ~ ~ O ~ ~ 5 ~ ~~ ~y e O ~+ O [ g ~z aye """"~ y ewdl v A~ m ~91ngx, w ~ ~~°~~i~~tl79 3 u E U u ~ ~ ~ z, c7 ~~'~ z ~... W ~, ~ • ~, , ,~' ~, . ~' ... _`` ,- ;; ~ ~ ' ,~;; t , ,a ' s ~ ~ tr °' { ~ ~ . , ~.. ~ ;~ ~' F ~: E r-r _~, ~l' {, _ T ,. _ i. . ._ .. s, ',a ~r _..... : ~ ' ; ~ ~~"- ~~ p ~`. ~. 3 t ~t ~~ i j~ '~ '- -~~ 1 - I i . i _ _ ~ 1 k~ r~~., ;, ~ ' ha :~. :t• -, ;, _. : u ~ ~'~, *Sf Y Y~ S Y 1 " ; i/ '3. ~ " a g~l ~ . _ ,~ :. I ~F 'r IL ~ H ~'.'v V _ 4 ~~{ r FL ~~ ~ I I ~ f ~1. -:j. 5 _ 2 r~. j •t ~ „~ f ~5. ~ V ` n !. ~.vIuSW ~ I.u 'I .. .. ... .. ... ''JJ "'C:S .. 4 .~ .. O ~~~ N ~r r~. AIA` ~i~i f-~ •~w~..yyy f~tl •~y ~I p~ Yr r C C M~ W q~q~ *W*~ V/ 0 Y ~d d 'gyp Fr '~q1 ~ 4 ~ Q MW. EIYII 5 FQ. ~~ VIIkN~ O W h4ud~ '~ ~ S u z w s E V U' = e a ? : . W`~,'6 W ~ ~ o U' ~ i i =u ~u '~NI'a a_y _., _. v , ,~' ,.. C .~ ~~., ;! ~ ~' ~. ~., ~I C~1 r~ t'~ C~i ~' ~~ ~~ L O w [ r ~j ~_ c ~ c i., `~ C~ ~° .,, ~ ~ 4~ ~ ~ ~ O ~° ~ *" ~ C ~Un i ~ o i ~~ ~ U ~~ O ti ~~~'~~~ p~nna8 _+ 3 J W U 2 U ~ 3 z , C ! C7 ~ i =na~n W .__ ~_ , -`_ _ - I-. _ ~ _ , . ~ ,. ~.~ ~I I C: - - - _ _ I ~ ~ - _ - _ - ~~ I i I_ -. ._ ~ c- - !` r _ _, _r- rt I ~„ "'rr '` -- r ~ ~I - I 'I rr 1 - _ _ - _ _ _ I I - _ ~,, .~ I t-~ ~ . Is 1,~" ~~~~a[J; iJ. ~4~ ~'[kf ~g1et 11 i ~ ~~~adti~~~ ,,'~4~~4 l 4~ r i - I' _ ~ ~ - r ,?. ~~` ~ eft t~ r it _ ~- 1 u1~~~~ n ~ ~A.~ yh~'~~ of 'I A' ~ I 1 _ - - - j 1 I ~` I r r rt~u ~ _ 7 '11 ~~~i" ) I I ~~ qq~.1 I~ ~ 3 l I I ~ ~ - n~y~`r`~Ikr'~~ r~X ~r[[r~vllil~. :I I AI I ~.r , r~~ '~, a ~{ f .~. ~~II r 1 ti~ I l fF ~ ~'r"~" J~: li,`} r~~.e'G''-- I t r s I~.~'.,~.~,~p"~ 'rs ~ i`dpl'.~~~ .iJy'~4r14ti17+r~~Eky ~ r I J f ~ -.:~ I i ~~ 'E ~I~ r~ '~"2~~7 r ~ I . ~ [ 3 ~~ £~' ~ l ~" x" '`- .p-- ,r.~t+ ~~Y~~~t ~) ~, I ~r !}t t5 ~ ~{ iP61 8 ~I - - ~ I -1 ~'~ f~r~~ .1 ~ I `' t F' [~ ~~ r~ G r~ r = 4 I ' Yi ~ _ " Y_ f'}j,~,r~ k' l~L~ ~ ~ r ` ~~~ r, ~IN]l~'l ~lx~~~ ~ _rr n) '~w$~ 1 f~ ~-rt~~ i r - r I C ,'- r I ~I yy1{J(,y I 1 ~ r I I = 1 .~ N _ = I[ ~ r r I( Is [ I ~ yl 4 7 _ _ ~ 1 tt r ~>~~i ~~ j r x;~ r~~ 3 r ~'[ 1 r _ [ 1 - it ~. f t _ i FMS' 1. - ~1 r t'- i 7Crf r'l~l. I C _ ~'~' l / ~ I - ,t , r ~„ l ,,~ ~ ~ ..,~ C , ~_ _ i r l '~~ - _ I, ,' - ~ - l - - i~ r I I ~, r ells I- - 1:. ';l f~,, ,- i, r. .. _ .'j ~_.- "~ _ _ _ - - Y~ `I I ~' tl If, ~ ~~ ~~ .i I I [ - - I I fl [ ~~ r ~~- ~, ~ r ,; p I r ~ r r I f ' ~ i ~~-~ `j 4 LL , f~ I r ~~ I h~ ' I S^ I _ 113 f, L _ ! I - - - . _ - _ _r _ I J r y l C I. I I :.a:oHO - .) ~l ~ I 1 { .. r' _ - I~ .r i Ht- - - ~ IL 1 ^rc9y1 u, ,tf _ - `fi`r ~ ]i_ __ - r t I I~,.. ~ ~ ~ I 1 _~ }. _ ~ lei [ - - = t F _ _ 1 _ _ - )7 [ ~ - - - _ ~ i i' I ,~ _ I ' ~ I ~~ ~i~n ~ ~-~ _ ~ I: ulw ; I It _ I I kr ,[ ~ ~ it - , _ ti;. _~ I r - ~r c. _ k„ t 1 I , I _ I G ~[ 11 i. ~; ''~~ r i 3 [ _.rr ~ )1l ~ ~f1e alrYittS 'Jl :'Y8E!' ~09J1»rtil~' '.):^.:PS~S FC _ I i ^ ~ ~~- r ~ - ~, i ~ y ~ ~ , ~ S Itl ~ I~ _ IiJu i _ 1 -. IZi€i1 33 a 'Ap?~I'Q3'Ld2S1:1~£R uASBtI ~di I it}~ ~ ';~! r„ I q,,-Tl ~ _ tyeti9 o~se~-~,~a*laa{, sad e~ae~d oe~t n ~ _ I} !, 14 ~' ' , 'i ~ I 7r1 ~i~~ a rnri3aa ui ia~a {sr~~~:a'l'ra~s?7 t~~e pica. ' ~ ~° I ~ ~ _ r~ld ,; 3 - ~ ~' I I I ~d'14 ~~rg@tiuaa a! Fiar~ r~?e:{ c~ist,~saeas +~~,a~~ r t ~ n r~ l ~ ~ T ,,, ~ I`_ r 1 '~~. oY su ~ 1. I ,t c~ `~ 1 I~ - ' dl~ a a 4 ~~.''y :~ ~, c ~t I 7 1} ~ I I ~ J IY' f1}J ~ _ ~ ~'h?~.'~,F~f.~~„1~,_ II ,, .~_ .,,~,...~~ ~t ~L <,~.N. ~ lull ~N I ~~ 1~3~~8~~ ~~Y.1~'SS4 c?&. U'c~ s.'9~?'2T' a a ~ W .. - Y r~nrrrc~ s~,a ~ ~s _ s a a e . 4rn.-di.rty ,_.._..-_ l.: r=:alr i :r.[__ ___:,: r~~~ ~.(3:i~?t3siC 'L.J~SS!~-tr, Y3t `3T3ti{ __ _ WIFELESS CO•l4MLG~1lCATtONS ~ U. ;; ,'our' I :: iJ[ti i7:iuts I Ln ~. ._ ,__~ __ -- ~x~ ::xn; ,~~ _ ~ _ a } :„ x, ~;.; ~'r""i^IT I~(ili"J~l =,iiV, `,; A. ~;y^ ... : I.., . _.. uIM e.N1FIG CONCEF'15 iPoC. . _ :~ t ~._ ,ais 't1 ~1 JLR IP1Tt ~ _ I P`~{OT rtE rl i) 4 ~ a I ,.(. ,_._._. ~. E'... ~~ ~ I M ~?t ,., ._ .. .- ,i. .~..rn OhiA 4b5i3 If c s~n~.,;. :u3J o.c.n. in .. eH .a ~. ,~I.. r^'i- _ ~ ~ " ' -,. " _ 7' _ ~E _a ~~ i I S~ F ~a , .Pj . i >, '~ ~i `~ ~:.x ;~ i `CY ~-°-~ I! ` ~ ~ ~~ 1 ~ 1 t ;z: ' i i •x i 3 fry `-t-s^ i S`= 1 _ r0. ~ ,"-~ I -~} 's' t~', i _ f ~. ' I r ~ ,~-' ' I i ~f ~ s b.w ,~. ~~es ',t ~~ I 1 4 1 -,.~.,. i1~~19mi~;, ~u~~~yl~;:: ~~ I `_' ~~ ~n ~ ~~~IN~i~ I ~' :;, lu~l~~il ~ ~; „~h~il ~ ~; :c'~Id41d,~1 ~,~ Op -. i~_: ~ . y~utl a .i ',it'= ~~~ _ ~'' _~ ,~~ :. .- - -- -._ ~: -~ - { =~.-= y- ~~,. ;~; a ~ ~~ ~ ~ , -~-: i i ~ ~I ~ i s I ~n - i '. ~- I IIIII+~fill } ~) ~ I~I~1~'J ili~jl I!~ I % r; ?~„ I!III;nf~ll! c3 ~. •Illpln~ t `• na,n±III~ ?a a nnllnl~~~ ~ ~; r~" ;;n l~;Ilii~ ~ w ul ~ ~~J ';~ ,~u',It ~~ ~ ~x~ 'r 11 ::,~ It~~yi~l u 1: ~,~ W ,~ _ , ,, w .. , ~,; _ Z ~.: a_~. .~~~;~~ 4'~. 'ji4,~w,~"M~' j`~~~ i~~ 'll'~ ;~ _,~.:_ f'~. «4{.. as=.r?e: ,~ 7 3 3 _ I .~ , ! ,:v - -- ~ ~., .. ~ ! ' ~, -- I a~ ,. _ .:.., r- r ' i~ ~1 Tx la~ ~ ` ; ~ . .~ 3 ~~ ~..... _ v y~1. __ ~„+ i -- ~ ,. ,~, tr"` ~ `~^' J ., !fir _ - 1 N = .-= a ,~ ,~~ . _ .. , ,.: a..._.. ~ . .._ r .- _ y _ ~~ ' - ' ~ - - - _ { ~ ,~ _; , ;_., 4' ~ ~ - ''s Q~ f ~ . ? t _ lV I"'" - ~. ~ f -- t - 4 ,. ,.,_. _ . .~ C.~ _Q ~_ 0 c~a C7 -~- - Ld ~~ ~I i C s '6 4!~ ~ C'• r^ C '~ rj GO Imo, J U ~ ~ G ~. l!'. _ • ~ ~ n G -O ^-t r ~ L ~ .r. .~ p U F L s y P ~,+~v s fT 'i~ 1 d, .ten -r. >. v rq, s i I ~ M ~ - "'~ ~~ z p i -I 19 ,~I~ ~~~ ~~ ~ 2 ~e4f'p ~~11- Il+ai~H,'.1~ z ~~ ~~n+, ~ `' ~'~tt~sai i~ f ~ %. uu,,~i j~~ ~~~ I~~fl ,~~{~~ w a (~~,~~~~~~ ~ w ,~ u a ~' h~,u~p V Z Q~ W U ~ Z O w U ~_ Z ~ a 2 ~ i i W u < W v ` u 6 Z ? < $ > t9 z < ~ Z w a ~ m ~^ n w w M _ N _. ~ ~ti ' ,~: 1 ~---, `. _~ ---$~ ~ .~ .1 ,~, r~ A~.(D} Aa(C 3.47 Ac. ~-~ ,:y ,~ ~.~ ti . ~' .x.20 :,c 4.Cd Ac. 5.25 Ac. ".136J "" 2. @5 Ac. w = "' 4.91 Ac. 15 10 Ac.{D'1 11.92 ac.(c~ ~ N;S. ~ ~~ ~ _:, s r _. 1h62~ n~~a /'`. .~~' 2.47 Ac. ~ fi 55,E _ ,Y. ry; .'" '750 r 11.48 Ac. D 7>s-sa 10.Q8 Ac.~G~ , ~: r r t ~ ~ { _ Y ~r ~ 3~q .: r.'" '1' 38 Ac. n !7 ~ 1.a0 Ac r 3.60 As .~ saw ;._' ~~~ . ?~Moun t Unien Chu~-c~ ,°~ ~ e of the Bnethnen 1.47 Ac. 2.80 ~ `".~ %1` ~'^ ~r 5.06 Ac. 21.05,.. Ac. 13s ~- 8a.~2 ~ o 2 765.76 /flJ m 22B 715.2 200 s ~ 1,92 Ac.(C~ "'."^.w s,~s, B~ , ./ 1.35 Ac. ~ '~ ~ ~~~ .. 1.23 Ac. .., ~ .~. ,~2~,~ +; ,, y { Ac. .~ 1.17 Ac 1.22 A ry^~ S~T`~„ %. 6 74a.ss $6 ~ t.64 Ac. ...,.. - ='~` 277.35. ~ ,~ ~;3 , `°-~.4„„ .. .., ;' . ~ ' - 1.11 - -' P ~ 92 Ac ~~ 1 Ac a2 $5 s0 ~:` . ~ .. . 1 .78 7.97 Ac. ° Ac. : ~~ ~ ~ ~~' h 6 •• .»' ~~ A '~ ,,Y 'r'''~ 2.62 AC --•„, ~ ~.._ . A`a , ~ ~. _ ' f 1.50 Ac. 2.23 ~ ,_ .r"-'-' ~ ... s: `, ~ `'~~ 2.61 Ac. i-% .:;;, - 1.79 A _ Ac . 2 09 . „ ~t'QA1VflI~~' C0~11lrTY ~Ini~es~ 5`t€x~~s G'ett~.s,l~~~ ~~~'~1~~'~E1~T ~~ S~eci~.l use p~rra~.i~ ~'a~i1~tU.l~T~~'Y ~~'~~'LC~PI~~'1~7' Tc 14~ap 1Vsa. 14~3.0~- ~-~~ & v5 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 23, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: First Reading of an Ordinance to Adopt Minor Amendments to the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: The Planning Commission has prepared and reviewed a series of minor amendments to the zoning ordinance text. A Commission public hearing on these amendments was held on February 2, 1999 These amendments have been initiated to keep our ordinance consistent with state code, and update terms and definitions. In addition the proposed changes, in part, • Change the districts where Home for Adults (Adult Care Residences) are allowed, • Change "Camp" uses to be allowed by special use permit in AG3, AG1 and AV zoning districts, • Change Religious Assembly uses to be allowed by special use permit in AV and C1 zoning districts, • Allow mini-warehouse uses by special use permit in I-2 districts, • Modify the use and design standards for PRD Districts, and for zero lot line housing, religious assembly, townhouses, and agricultural (vineyard) uses, • Add a new use type definition and use and design standards for composting uses, and • Modifies standards for Family Day Care Homes in R1 and a ~- i 2 R2 zoning districts to require a special use permit for this use. Staff recommends as follows: 1. That the Board of Supervisors hold first reading of this ordinance on March 23, 1999 and schedule second reading and a public hearing for April 27, 1999. Staff also recommends a Board worksession on April 27th to review these proposed changes. Respectfully Submitted, ~l/l~° Approved, Elmer C. Hodg County Administrator Terrance ~rington, AICP Depart nt o Community Development Action Approved ( ) Motion by Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Vote No Yes Abs Harrison Johnson McNamara Minnix Nickens a a ~~ PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE CHANGES ~~/ I. Updates for Titles of administrators and departments a) All references to the Director of Planning shall hereafter be referred to as the County Planner. b) All references to the Director of Engineering and Inspections: shall hereby be referred to as the Director of Community Development. c) All references to the Department of engineering and inspections shall hereafter be referred to as the Department of community development. SEC. 30-3. PURPOSE. 9. Protect approach slopes and other safety areas of licensed airports,-ate; l0.Protect surface and groundwater resources-,and; `11.Promote the creation andpreservation of affordable housing suitable for meeting the current and future needs for the localityas well as a reasonable proportion of the current and future needs of the planning district where the localityis situated. II. SEC.30-6. ESTABLISHMENT OF DISTRICTS Industrial Districts PITD Planned Technology District PID Change to PTD and Industrial Development to Technology in Articles'I, II, III, IV, and V III. Special Purpose Districts BRPO Blue Ridge Parkway Overlay (Reserved) ATO Appalachiari Trail Overlay District (Reserved) RTVO Ridge Top/Viewshed Overlay District (Reserved) CHO Cluster Housing Overlay District (Reserved) IV SEC. 30-8-1. Comprehensive Plan. (A) The commission shall prepare and recommend a comprehensive plan; hereafter referred to as a community plan, for the physical... Reference to "the ComprehensivePlan"`hall be changed to "the~Community Plan", throughout the ordinance. V. SEC. 30-22. PENALTIES G-I (A) Any violation of any provision of this ordinance shall be a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not less than ten dollars ($10) nor more than ene~l3eusa~ twothousand~five hundred dollars($~989 2,500). VI. SEC. 30-23 NONCONFORMING USES AND STRUCTURES; GENERALLY (A) Within the zoning districts established by this ordinance, or by future amendments which may later be adopted, or by legitimate and legal' actions .taken.. Uy the-board or any other. governmental agency, .there exist, or may exist lots, parcels, structures, uses of land and structures, and characteristics of site... VII. Sec. 30-23-2 Nonconforming Uses of Buildings, Structures or land (F) ~. 1'hissectionshall notapply to broadcasting towers and associated~aritenna allowedby right as set forth in Section 30-57-2 B VIII. Sec. 30-28 Definitions. X41- 4t l.' .. 4L .. «. ..~ n All references to rural and urban service areas to be removed from ordinance. IX. Sec. 30-29-2. Residential Use Types Kennel, Private: The keeping, breeding, raising, showing or training of three 3 or more dogs over four (4) sj months of age... X. Sec. 30-29-3 Civic Use Types ~~~.__.. n.... ~ a-.~~~ Adult Care Residences,- An establishment that provides shelter and services which may include meals, housekeeping, and personal care assistance primarily for the elderly. Residents are able to maintain asemi-independent life style, not requiring the more extensive care of a nursing home. Residents will, at a minimum, need assistance with at Least one of the following: medication management, meal preparation, housekeeping, money management, or personal`hygiene. At least one nurse's adis typically on duty, with medical staff is available when needed. Home For Adults changed to Adult Care Residences. throughout the ordinance.. 2 G- ~ Nursing Home - A use providing bed care and in-patient services for persons requiring regular medical attention but excluding a facility providing surgical or emergency medical services and excluding a facility providing care for alcoholism, drug addiction, mental disease, or communicable disease. Ntusinghomes'have doctorsor licensed nurses on duty.. XI Sec. 30-29-5. Commercial Use Types Automobile Repair Services, Major.• Repair of construction equipment, commercial trucks, agricultural implements and similar heavy equipment, including automobiles, where major engine and transmission repairs are conducted. This includes minor automobile repairs in con}unction with major automobile repairs. Typical uses... > > Funeral Hs»re Services ~ Establishments engaged in undertaking services such as preparing the dead for burial, and arranging and managing funerals. Typical uses include r--~°~"-~~--~~ ~° mortuaries and crematories. FuneralHomes changed to Funeral Servicesthroughoutthe ordinance XII. Sec. 30-29-6. Industrial Use Types Composting: processby which animal wastes and plant discards are combined andmanipulatedto produce a soil additive/nutrient. Composting does not include the processing of municipal waste. XIII. SEC. 30-32. AG-3 AGRICULTURAL/RURAL PRESERVE DISTRICT Sec. 30-32-2 Permitted Uses. (A) The following uses are permitted by right.. 3. Civic Uses Family Day Care Home* (B) The following uses are allowed only by Special Use Permit.. 1.Agricultural and Forestry uses Composting* 2.Civie Uses Camps* SEC. 30-33. AG-1 AGRICULTURAL/RURAL LOW DENSITY DISTRICT Sec. 30-33-2 Permitted Uses. 3 G-t (A) The following uses are permitted by right.. l.Agricultural and Forestry uses 3.Civic Uses (B) The following uses are allowed only by Special Use Permit.. 1.Agricultural and Forestry uses 2. Civic Uses Camps* 6.Irrdustrial Uses Composting` SEC. 30-34. AR AGRICULTURAL/RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Sec. 30-34-2 Permitted Uses. (B) The following uses are allowed only by Special Use Permit... 4.Industrial Uses Custom Manufacturng* SEC. 30-36. AV AGRICULTURAL/VILLAGE CENTER DISTRICT (A) The purpose of the AV, Agricultural/Village Center district.. Sec. 30-36-2 Permitted Uses. A) The following uses are permitted by right.. 3. Civic Uses r r,,.,.. ~ r. ,... n a.. t,.,, Adult CareResidences (B) The following uses are allowed only by Special Use Permit.. 3.Civic Uses Camps* Religious Assembly Sec. 30-41. R-1 Low Density Residential District Sec. 30-41-2. Permitted Uses. (A) The following uses are permitted by right... 2. Civic Uses (B) The following uses are allowed only by Special Use Permit... 2. Civic Uses Family Day Care Home* SEC. 30-42. R-2 MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Sec. 30-42-2. Permitted Uses (A) The following uses are permitted by right... 4 a-i 2. Civic Uses (B) The following uses are allowed by Special Use Permit... 2. Civic Uses Educational Facilities, Primary/Secondary Adult Care Residences Family Day Care Horne SEC. 30-45. R-3 MEDIUM DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Sec. 30-45-2 Permitted Uses. (A) The following uses are permitted by right.... 2.Civic Uses Family Day Care Home Adult Care Residences SEC. 30-47. PRD PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Sec. 30-47-3. Site Development Regulations (A) Each planned residential development shall be subject to the following development standards. vuo iuiiu ~. ~. ~3. § 4. 6 5. ~ 6. $ T. } 8. SEC. 30-53. C-1 OFFICE DISTRICT Sec. 30-53-3 Permitted Uses. (A) The following uses are permitted by right... 2.Civic Uses 4.Commercial Uses (B) The following uses are allowed by Special Use Permit.. 1.Civic Uses Religious Assembly SEC. 30-54. C-2 GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT Sec. 30-54-2 Permitted Uses. (A) The following uses are permitted by right... l.Residential Uses Accessory Aparhnent Multi-Family Dwelling* Two-family Dwelling's 4.Commercial Uses Eli~tie (B) The following uses are allowed by Special Use Permit.. l.Civic Uses rr.,...,.,, r~- n a..i,.. Adult Care Residences SEC. 30-61 I-1 INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT Sec. 30-61-2. Permitted Uses. (B) The following uses are allowed by Special Use Permit. 2.Industrial Uses Composting* SEC. 30-62 I-2 INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT Sec. 30-62-2. Permitted Uses. (A) The following uses are permitted by right... 4.Commercial Uses Equipment Sales and See Rental (B) The following uses are allowed by Special Use Permit.. 1. Commercial Uses Mini-warehouse* 2.Industrial Uses Composting* G~ ~ XIV. SEC. 30-73 ECO EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS OVERLAY DISTRICT Sec. 30-73-5. Permits (A) Any application..shall be referred to the `~~'--~--' ~-~-~~~~ ~r~:-~° Communications Coordinator of the fire and rescue department. Sec. 30-73-6 Appeals (A) Any decision of the ` '~--=~~' ~~-"~~~~ ..rr.°°tl Communications Coordinator with regards... XV. Sec. 30-81-1. Agriculture (B') Commercial uses such as gift shops arrdrestaurantsrisociated with'viticulture operatigns shall be allowed only by Special Use Permit XVI. Sec. 30-82-11 Multi-Family Dwelling. 6 G-I (B) General Standards 8. Provisions must be made l~or ~ ~hicular access and turn around far regularly scheduled public service vehicles such as trash collection: (F) General Standards in the C-1 and C-2 districts, independent of the general standards above:... XVII. (B) Sec. 30-82-12 Single Family, Detached (Zero Lot Line Option) 2. The minimum lot size, frontage and front and rear yard setbacks required in the District Regulations may be reduced up to twenty (20) percent, however the normal front, rear, and side yard setbackrequirement must be maintained adjacent to any lot. or public street or right-of--way not within the common development; or not otherwise designated for zero lot line use. 3- , , - Yr:,Y.,, ~y .....,. Sec. 30-82-13. Single family, Attached (B) The minimum lot size, frontage and front and rear yard setbacks required in the District Regulations may be reduced up to twenty (20) percent, however the normal front, rear, and side yard setback requirement must be maintained adj acent to any lot or public street or right-of--way. not within the common development; or not otherwise designated for zero lot line use. XVIII. Sec. 30-82-14. Townhouses 7 G-I 9Provisions mustbe made for vehicularaccess and~ttirn aroundfor regularlyscheduled public sei-vice vehicles such as trash collection. XIX. SEC. 30-83 CIVIC USES Sec. 30-83-0.5 Camps (Camps to be changed`to Special Uses in all zoning districts.) (A) General standards: Any outdoor activity area, swimming pool, or ball field or court which adjoins a residential use type shall be landscaped with one row of small evergreen trees in accordance with Section 30-92 along the property line adjoining the residential use type. Where night-time lighting of such areas is proposed large evergreen trees shall be required in a location appropriate to screen adjoining residences. 2. Multiple structures may be constructed on the property, such as cabins, lodges and other facilities typical of a camp provided that all structures comply with the setback requirements for a principal structure from adjoining property lines. Each building intended to accommodate members shall be accessible via an all weather road suitable to accommodate emergency vehicles serving the property. 4. One year-round residence, including a Manufactured Home, may be constructed as a caretakers home in addition to other facilities on the property. (Amend. Ord 62795-10) XX. Sec. 30-83-9. Religious Assembly. (C) a. The total gross floor area of the expansion itself does not exceed ~A$15000 square feet; and b. The gross floor area of the expansion is not more than enured two hundred (~98 200) percent of the existing gross floor area; and... XXI. SEC. 30-85 COMMERCIAL USES Sec. 30-85-5. Automobile Repair Services, Major (A) Minor,repairs_shall be permitted in conjunction with major repairs. 8 G-I XXII. SEC. 30-86. INDUSTRIAL USES Sec. 3D-8'6-1.5. Composting. (A) General Standards: 1. The area designed for composting shall be located greater than 300 feet from all property lines. 2'. The area designated for composting shall bemorethan 1000.feet from any dwelling not located on the same property as the composting site. 3. The area designated for composting shall not be located within an area designated as a floodplain as defined in the Code of Virginia. 4. The operator shalLprovide adequate protection, either physical or natural, for any body of water such as a stream, creek, or lake, from inundation by the composting operation. 5. No portion of the areafor composting shall lie within a designated 100-year floodplain as determined by the Federal Emergency Management agency. 6. The agricultural operationassociated with the composting shall have at least one acre of ground suitableta receive yard waste for. each 150 cubic yards of finished compost generated annually, 7. ~ Materials. to be used inthe composting process must be used as such and not leftout in the open where it could create. an odor or sight nuisance or health hazard. 8. Composting operations shall not include the processing of municipal wastes. 9. All composting operations are required to meet alI applicable state and federal regulations regarding their _,_ performance. XXIII. Sec. 30-86-3. Custom Manufacturing (B) Additional standards in the AG-3, AG-1, AR and AV districts: 1. Maximum square footage for a custom manufacturing establishment: tree six thousand (3;999 6,000) square feet. (C) Additional standards in the AG-3, AG-1 and AR districts:... XXIV. Sec. 30-87-.05. Amateur Radio Tower. (C) 1. The maximum height permitted by right for an amateur radio tower shall be ~e seventy-five (6~ 75) feet. Any tower which exceeds this height... XXV Sec. 30-90-4 Minimum Standards and Improvements Required (J) "Provisions must be made for. vehicular access and turn around .for regularly `scheduled public service vehicles such as trash collection. 9 s G-I ~VI. Sec. 30-91-2. General regulations for Parking. 1. Except for vehicles parked within multi-family developments all recreational vehicles, boats, and utility trailers shall be parked in a side: or rear. yard behind the front building line, unless space is provided in a completely enclosed garage or other building. In the. instance of a corner lot that fronts on t`vo streets,'each yai-d'that fronts a street willcountas thefrontyard. 2. No truck or commercial vehicle with, or designed to have, more than two (2) rear wheels shall be parked ~; except while loading or unloading... XXVII. Sec. 30-91-9. Minimum Parking Required. USE TYPE (C) Civic Use Types Camps (E) Commercial Use Types PARKING REQUIRED See Schedule B Automobile Repair Services, Minor , , See Schedule A Sec. 30-91-10. Stacking Spaces and Drive-Through Facilities. (A) 43. §4. ~5. 10 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 1999 ORDINANCE 032399-2 APPROVING THE EXERCISE OF AN OPTION TO PURCHASE AGREEMENT WITH SALEM OFFICE SUPPLY, INC., FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 400 EAST MAIN STREET, ACROSS FROM THE ROANOKE COUNTY COURTHOUSE, IN SALEM, VIRGINIA WHEREAS, by Resolution #011299-7, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County approved an Option to Purchase Agreement dated January 5, 1999, with Salem Office Supply, Inc., a Virginia corporation, for an option to purchase a 17,754 square-foot rectangular lot (66' x 269') located at 400 East Main Street, Salem, Virginia, identified on the Salem City Tax Map as Parcel #107-6-1 ("the Property"); and, WHEREAS, under terms of said agreement, the purchase price for the Property is $325,000.00, and the option must be exercised on or before March 5, 1999; and, WHEREAS, the agreement provides for settlement within 60 days from the date of the notice of exercise of the Option, or as soon thereafter as possible, but no later than April 30, 1999; and WHEREAS, the property is necessary for use as additional office and storage space, and the funds are available in the Capital Fund; and, WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs that the acquisition and conveyance of real estate interests be accomplished by ordinance; the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 9, 1999; on February 23, 1999, the Board authorized extending the option until June 5, 1999; the second reading was held on March 23, 1999. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to exercise the option to purchase from Salem Office Supply, Inc., the following described real estate, to-wit: All that certain tract or parcel of land, together with any improvements thereon, rights incident thereto, and appurtenances thereunto belonging, situate in the City of Salem, Virginia, containing 17,754 square feet, more or less, and located on the south side of East Main Street, and bounded on the west by Strawberry Alley and on the south by East Calhoun Street, and more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the South side of East Main Street where the east line of Strawberry Alley intersects the South line of Main Street, and which beginning point is N. 77° 16' E. 263.3 feet from a point where the East line of College Avenue intersects the South line of Main Street (.3 of one foot West of the Northwest corner of the Salem Theatre Building) and which said beginning point is also S. 77 ° d 16' W. 3 feet from the North west corner of the present brick building located on the herein conveyed lot; thence leaving Main Street and with the East line of Strawberry Alley, and with aline 3 feet from and parallel with the West side of said brick building located on herein conveyed lot, S. 13 ° 25' E. 269 feet to a point in the North line of Calhoun Street, N. 77° 16' E. 66 feet to a point, marked by South east corner of a building located on herein described lot; thence leaving Calhoun Street N. 13 ° 25' W. 269 feet to a point in the South line of Main Street, which said point is 3 feet East of the Northeast corner of brick building located on the within described lot; thence with the South line of East Main Street S. 77° 16' W. 66 feet to the place of BEGINNING; known as Lot 69, Old Town Plat. There is excepted from the above description that certain 10 foot strip of land which was conveyed by Carlos G. Bowers and Maria Cristina Bowers to the Town of Salem by deed dated January 31, 1953, and of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 485, page 513. BEING the same property conveyed to the Grantor by deed from Carlos G. Bowers and Maria Cristina Bowers, his wife, dated December 11, 1975, and of record in the Clerk's Office of the City of Salem, Virginia, in Deed Book 40, page 658. Said real estate is further shown and designated upon the Salem City land records as Tax Parcel Number 107-6-1, and having a street address of 400 East Main Street, Salem, Virginia. 2 2. That the sum of $620,000.00 is hereby appropriated from the Capital Fund and $81,720.00 is hereby appropriated from the Unappropriated Fund Balance of the General Fund for the acquisition of this real estate and related expense. In addition, $150,000.00 is reappropriated from the Jail Expansion capital project to this capital project. 3. That the County Administrator, or an Assistant County Administrator, is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County in this matter as are necessary to accomplish the exercise of the option, all of which shall be approved as to form by the County Attorney 4. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Harrison to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Minnix, Harrison, Nickens NAYS: Supervisors McNamara, Johnson A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc File John M. Chambliss, Jr:, Assistant County Administrator Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Michael Lazzuri, Court Services Steven A. McGraw, Clerk, Circuit Court Sheriff Gerald Holt 3 ACTION N0. ITEM NUMBER - AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 23, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: Second Reading of an Ordinance Approving the Exercise of an Option to Purchase Agreement with Salem Office Supply, Inc., for Property Located at 400 East Main Street, Across from the Roanoke County Courthouse, in Salem, Virginia COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: At the January 12, 1999 meeting, the Board of Supervisors authorized staff to place a $3,000 option fee (to be applied to the purchase price) on the Salem Office Supply, Inc. property located across from the Roanoke County Courthouse at 400 East Main Street in Salem, Virginia. The property is a lot approximately 17,754 square feet with a two story building currently used as a showroom, office, and warehouse operation. At the February 23, 1999 meeting, staff was directed to extend the option to purchase as authorized in the agreement. Staff has paid the $2,000 amount which extends the option to purchase agreement until June 5, 1999. By exercising the option, we plan to acquire the property by May 1, 1999 or 60 days after notice is given, (whichever is later), renovate the space for office use and storage, and occupy the building in the summer/fall of 1999. MarshWitt, Architects and Engineers, has worked with staff to design the space for use and to determine the improvements required. Attachment A shows the anticipated costs for the acquisition and renovation of the Salem Office Supply Building. There were two areas that the estimates of the A/E were significantly different from staff estimates. The electrical service is currently a 60 amp service and it is suggested to upgrade this to a 400 amp service to meet current code requirements for an office configuration. The mechanical system including the HVAC system must be completely replaced because of the age of the system being beyond the suggested life based on industry standards. Also, the existing system only served the front half of the building. The architect projected the renovations to cost $506,720. This includes the cost to replace the roof on the back half of the building which is approximately 15 years old and in good condition. The cost to H- replace the roof over the entire building would be an additional $20,000 which will be accomplished within the budget requested. This cost of renovation is compared to the staff's original estimate of $425,000. We plan to locate the Court Service Unit and related grant function offices in the new space, part of the Sheriff's Office, and storage for the Clerk of Circuit Court. We will still have some room for future expansion. Moving the Court Service Unit out of the Courthouse is necessary to allow the improvements previously approved by the Board of Supervisors. These improvements include the relocation of the Sheriff Administrative offices and the demolition of the Guy House and Sheriff Annex building. The demolition will allow the creation of much needed parking for the Courthouse complex. The purchase price for the Salem Office Supply property is $325,000. The consultant's estimated cost for renovations is $506,720 with an additional $20,000 for related fees and expenses. To fund the project, it is suggested that the $150,000 previously set aside for the jail expansion be reappropriated to this project. $620,000 is available in the Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance (current balance is $631,042.93). The balance of $81,720 is requested to be appropriated from the Unappropriated Fund Balance of the General Fund. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve the Second Reading of the attached ordinance authorizing the exercise of the option to purchase the Salem Office Supply property to be renovated to accommodate the office space needs in Salem and appropriate the monies necessary to carry out the project. 2. Do not approve the purchase of the Salem Office Supply property. The Board will then need to authorize the rental or purchase of other office space for the Court Service Unit. This action will allow the space within the Courthouse to be improved to meet the needs of the offices remaining on the site. FISCAL IMPACT: The cost of the purchase and renovation of the Salem Office Supply building is estimated at $851,720. Jail expansion project fund of $150,000 will be reappropriated, $620,000 will be appropriated from the Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance, and the balance of $81,720 is suggested to come from the Unappropriated Fund Balance of the General Fund. 2 N- RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends Alternative 1 to authorize the approval of the second reading of the ordinance authorizing the exercise of the option to purchase agreement for the Salem Office Supply building and to appropriate the monies necessary to complete this project. Respectfully submitted, Appr ved by, ~ ~~~ John M. Chambli s, Jr. Elmer C. Hodge Assistant Administrator County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Harrison Received ( ) Johnson Referred ( ) McNamara To ( ) Minnix Nickens Attachment cc Diane Hyatt Mike Lazzuri Steve McGraw Sheriff Holt 3 MARCH 10, 1999 SALEM OFFICE SUPPLY BUILDING 1 Abatement 2 Demolition 3 Electrical Service Upgrade 4 Mechanical System Replacement 5 Plumbing System / Restrooms 6 Roof Replacement (Rear Portion) 7 Sprinkler System 8 Floor Leveling 9 Exterior Wall Repairs 10 Window Replacement 11 Interior Wall Shell Renovation 12 Suspended Ceiling System 13 Interior Lighting Sub-Total 14 Contingency Total Attachment A /_/ PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE TOTAL AREA UNIT COST PER ROUNDED 8, 800 sf $1.00 $8, 800.00 1 job 5,000.00 5,000.00 19,110 sf 3.51 67,000.00 19,110 sf 7.00 133,700.00 13, 410 sf 1.82 25, 000.00 9, 000 sf 4.44 40, 000.00 19,110 sf 2.00 38, 220.00 9, 000 sf 1.67 15, 000.00 1 job 35, 000.00 35, 000.00 47 each 1, 000.00 47, 000.00 8, 000 sf 1.88 15, 000.00 13,410 sf 1.94 26,000.00 140 each 185.71 26, 000.00 $481, 720.00 1 na 25, 000.00 25, 000.00 -------------------- $506, 720.00 y-1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 1999 ORDINANCE APPROVING THE EXERCISE OF AN OPTION TO PURCHASE AGREEMENT WITH SALEM OFFICE SUPPLY, INC., FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 400 EAST MAIN STREET, ACROSS FROM THE ROANOKE COUNTY COURTHOUSE, IN SALEM, VIRGINIA WHEREAS, by Resolution #011299-7, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County approved an Option to Purchase Agreement dated January 5, 1999, with Salem Offi ~: e Supply, Inc., a Virginia corporation, for an option to purchase a 17,754 square-foot rectangular lot (66' x 269') located at 400 East Main Street, Salem, Virginia, identified on the Salem City Tax Map as Parcel # 107-6-1 ("the Property"); and, WHEREAS, under terms of said agreement, the purchase price for the Property is $325,000.00, and the option must be exercised on or before March 5, 1999; and, WI~REAS, the agreement provides for settlement within 60 days from the date of the notice of exercise of the Option, or as soon thereafter as possible, but no later than April 30, 1999; and WHEREAS, the property is necessary for use as additional office and storage space, and the funds are available in the Capital Fund; and, WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs that the acquisition and conveyance of real estate interests be accomplished by ordinance; the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 9, 1999; on February 23, 1999, the Boazd authorized extending the option until June 5, 1999; the second reading was held on March 23, 1999. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Boazd of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: /f -/ That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to exercise the option to purchase from Salem Office Supply, Inc., the following described real estate, to-wit: All that certain tract or parcel of land, together with any improvements thereon, rights incident thereto, and appurtenances thereunto belonging, situate in the City of Salem, Vuginia, containing 17,754 squaze feet, more or less, and located on the south side of East Main Street, and bounded on the west by Strawberry Alley and on the south by East Calhoun Street, and more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the South side of East Main Street where the east line of Strawberry Alley intersects the South line of Main Street, and which beginning point is N. 77 ° 16' E. 263.3 feet from a point where the East line of College Avenue intersects the South line of Main Street (.3 of one foot West of the Northwest corner of the Salem Theatre Building) and which said beginning point is also S. 77° d16' W. 3 feet from the North west corner of the present brick building located on the herein conveyed lot; thence leaving Main Street and with the East line of Strawberry Alley, and with aline 3 feet from and parallel with the West side of said brick building located on herein conveyed lot, S. 13 ° 25' E. 269 feet to a point in the North line of Calhoun Street, N. 77° 16' E. 66 feet to a point, marked by South east corner of a building located on herein described lot; thence leaving Calhoun Street N. 13 ° 25' W. 269 feet to a point in the South line of Main Street, which said point is 3 feet East of the Northeast corner of brick building located on the within described lot; thence with the South line of East Main Street S. 77 ° 16' W. 66 feet to the place of BEGINNING; known as Lot 69, Old Town Plat. There is excepted from the above description that certain 10 foot strip of land which was conveyed by Cazlos G. Bowers and Maria Cristina Bowers to the Town of Salem by deed dated January 31, 1953, and of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 485, page 513. BEING the same property conveyed to the Grantor by deed from Carlos G. Bowers and Maria Cristina Bowers, his wife, dated December 11, 1975, and of record in the Clerk's Office of the City of Salem, Virginia, in Deed Book 40, page 658. Said real estate is further shown and designated upon the Salem City land records as Tax Parcel Number 107-6-1, and having a street address of 400 East Main Street, Salem, Virginia. 2. That the sum of $620,000.00 is hereby appropriated from the Capital Fund and $81,720.00 is hereby appropriated from the Unappropriated Fund Balance of the General Fund for 2 a N-! the acquisition of this real estate and related expense. In addition, $150,000.00 is reappropriated from the Jail Expansion capital project to this capital project. 3. That the County Administrator, or an Assistant County Administrator, is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County in this matter as are necessary to accomplish the exercise of the option, all of which shall be approved as to form by the County Attorney. 4. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. G:\COMMON\MAR94SALEMOFF.ORD 3 ... ~$ - AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 1999 ORDINANCE 032399-3 DECLARING A PARCEL OF REAL ESTATE TO BE SURPLUS AND AN ACCEPTING OFFER FOR THE SALE OF SAME; NAMELY THE PENN FOREST BOULEVARD WELL LOT BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property, having been made available for other public uses before permitting disposition by sale, is hereby declared to be surplus. 2. That an advertisement for bids for the sale of this surplus real estate was advertised in the Roanoke Times & World News on March 13, 1999; and 3. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading of this ordinance was held on March 9, 1999, and the second reading was held on March 23, 1999, concerning the disposition of the following parcel of real estate identified as follows: Penn Forest Boulevard Well Lot Tax Map Parcel No. 87.06-6-1 4. That offers for said properties having been received, the offer of David Hill to purchase this property for the sum of 23 600 Dollars is hereby acceptedf~ejeetee!'. 5. That the purchase price for the property will be paid upon delivery of a deed therefor and all proceeds from the sale of this real estate will be deposited into the water fund in accordance with the trust agreements of the 1991 water revenue bonds. 6. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the sale 1 6 i ~ t of said property, all of which will be on form approved by the County Attorney. 7. That this ordinance will be effective on and from the date of its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance and accept the offer of David Hill for $23,600, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: yyl~- ~/. G~~_ Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Gary Robertson, Director, Utility John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~^ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 23, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE DECLARING A PARCEL OF REAL ESTATE TO BE SURPLUS AND ACCEPTING AN OFFER FOR THE SALE OF SAME; NAMELY THE PENN FOREST BOULEVARD WELL LOT COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This is the second reading of an ordinance to sell a surplus well lot, in response to the receipt of an offer for same. BACKGROUND: On October 25, 1994, the Board adopted a policy for the sale or disposal of surplus real estate. Many of the parcels identified as surplus are well lots abandoned with the completion of the reservoir and the water transmission lines. This procedure provided for the annual advertisement and publication of the surplus real estate list, inviting bids from the public. This notice and list of properties were advertised in the Roanoke Times & World News on Apri19, 1995. Once an offer is received, staff submits the offer to the Board of Supervisors in executive session after evaluation by the County Administrator, County Attorney and Property Manager. If the Board wishes to proceed, then the County Attorney prepares an appropriate ordinance for first reading, which constitutes notice that a bona fide offer has been received, and that other written offers may be received unti15:00 p.m. the Friday preceding the next Board meeting. The identity of the offeror and the amount, terms or conditions of the offer or bid will be kept confidential until the second reading. At second reading the Board may accept the best offer received or reject all offers. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The County received one offer to purchase a parcel of real estate identified as "Penn Forest Boulevard Well Lot" -Tax Map Parcel No. 87.06-6-1. 1 . ~_ Advertisement for bids for the sale of this surplus property will be published in The Roanoke Times on Sunday, March 13, 1999. Notices will be mailed to the adjoining property owners and a sign will be posted on the property. FISCAL IMPACTS: The proceeds from the sale of this real estate will be deposited into the water fund in accordance with the trust agreements of the 1991 water revenue bonds. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board favorably consider the adoption of the attached ordinance. Respectfully submitted, ~~ •~ au a oney County Attorney Action Vote No Yes Abs Approved () Motion by Harrison Denied () Johnson Received () McNamara Referred O Minnix to Nickens U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\REALESTI5URPLUS\SURPLUS.IST 2 ~- a AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 1999 ORDINANCE DECLARING A PARCEL OF REAL ESTATE TO BE SURPLUS AND AN ACCEPTING OFFER FOR THE SALE OF SAME; NAMELY THE PENN FOREST BOULEVARD WELL LOT BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property, having been made available for other public uses before permitting disposition by sale, is hereby declared to be surplus. 2. That an advertisement for bids for the sale of this surplus real estate was advertised in the Roanoke Times & World News on March 13, 1999; and That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading of this ordinance was held on March 9, 1999, and the second reading was held on March 23, 1999, concerning the disposition of the following parcel of real estate identified as follows: Penn Forest Boulevard Well Lot Tax Map Parcel No. 87.06-6-1 4. That offers for said properties having been received, the offer of to purchase this property for the sum of Dollars is hereby accepted/rejected. 5. That the purchase price for the property will be paid upon delivery of a deed therefor and all proceeds from the sale of this real estate will be deposited into the water fund in accordance with the trust agreements of the 1991 water revenue bonds. 6. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the sale of said property, all of which will be on form approved by the County Attorney. That this ordinance will be effective on and from the date of its adoption. U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\REALES'IISURPLUS\PENNFRST.ORD ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~'" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 23, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE ACCEPTING AN OFFER FOR AND AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF 37.86 ACRES OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED IN THE CITY OF SALEM (THE LLOYD PROPERTY - TAX MAP NO. 194-1-1) COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Several parties have expressed interest in acquiring the Lloyd property. We may wish to discuss these with the Board in Executive Session prior to taking action on this item. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This is the second reading of a proposed ordinance to authorize the conveyance of a 37.86-acre parcel of real estate located in the City of Salem (Tax Map No. 194-1-1). BACKGROUND: The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County has previously declared this property to be surplus property and available for sale to the public. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Roanoke County has received an offer to purchase a 37.86-acre parcel of real estate located in the City of Salem and known as the Lloyd Property. A public notice advertising for bids on the sale of this surplus property was published in the Roanoke Times on Sunday, March 13, 1999. FISCAL IMPACT: to the Capital Projects Fund. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends that the Board approve the second reading of this ordinance and that the County Administrator be authorized to execute the necessary documents to consummate this transaction. G:ACOMMON\MAR23\LLOYD.R2T Respectfully submitted, aul M. Mahoney ~ Roanoke County Attorney Action Vote No Yes Abs Approved () Motion by Harrison Denied () Johnson Received () McNamara Referred () Minnix to Nickens U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\REALEST\LLOYD.RPT /~- 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 1999 ORDINANCE ACCEPTING AN OFFER FOR AND AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF 37.86 ACRES OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED IN THE CITY OF SALEM (THE LLOYD PROPERTY -TAX MAP NO. 194-1-1) BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property has been declared to be surplus, and has been made available for sale; and That an advertisement for bids for the sale of this surplus property was advertised in the Roanoke Times & World News on March 13, 1999; and 3. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading of this ordinance was held on March 9, 1999; and the second reading on this ordinance was held on March 23, 1999, concerning the sale and disposition of 37.86 acres of real estate located in the City of Salem, and known as the Lloyd Property; and 4. That an offer has been received from to purchase 37.86 acres of real estate for the sum of ,and this offer is hereby accepted; and That the proceeds from the sale of this real estate are to be allocated to the capital reserves of the County to be expended solely for the purposes of acquisition, construction, maintenance, or replace of other capital facilities; and 6. That Ordinance 62789-6 adopted by the Board of Supervisors on June 27, 1989, accepting an offer for and authorizing the sale of this 37.86-acre parcel of real estate is hereby rescinded; and 7. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said property, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\REALESIII.LOYD.PR0 ~-. _ ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 1999 ORDINANCE 032399-4 REPEALING ORDINANCE 101497-8 AND AUTHORIZING THE CREATION OF AND FINANCING FOR A LOCAL PUBLIC WORKS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, LITTLE BRUSHY MOUNTAIN WATER PROJECT WHEREAS, Ordinance 101497-8 adopted by the Board on October 14, 1997, authorized the creation of and financing for the Little Brushy Mountain Water Project; however, due to limited citizen participation, the project was not constructed; and WHEREAS, funding is now available through the State of Virginia, Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Program, which program allows for more affordable financing for the participating citizens; WHEREAS, due to substantial changes in the original project authorized by Ordinance 101497-8, that ordinance will be repealed and a new ordinance will be adopted; and WHEREAS, Ordinance 112288-7 authorizes the financing of local public works improvements and the imposition of special assessments upon abutting property owners upon the adoption of an appropriate ordinance by the Board of Supervisors; and WHEREAS, the County Administration has negotiated the extension of the public water system to the Little Brushy Mountain Community; and WHEREAS, the extension of the public water system and the creation of a special utility (water) service area will alleviate a critical public health and safety problem; and WHEREAS, several of the residents have requested that the County allow them to pay their portion of the costs of connection to the public water system over twenty years 1 at an interest rate of 3%, which are the terms of the loan from the Commonwealth of Virginia; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this Ordinance was held on March 9, 1999, and the second reading was held March 23, 1999; and BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Ordinance 101497-8 adopted by the Board on October 14, 1997, be, and hereby is, repealed; and 2. That the County Administrator be, and hereby is, authorized and directed to take such actions and execute such documents as may be necessary to secure a loan from the Commonwealth of Virginia, Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Program in the amount of $820,000 at an interest rate of 3% and for a term of twenty years; and 3. That pursuant to the authority of Ordinance 112288-7, the Board authorizes and approves a local public works improvement project, namely, public water extension for a portion of the Little Brushy Mountain Community. The total construction cost of this public water project is estimated to be $820,000, to be initially financed as follows: Citizen Participation (43 at $6,155 each) $264,665 Advance from Water Fund 555, 335 TOTAL $820, 000 That there is hereby appropriated for this project the sum of $820,000 from the Water Fund; it being the Board's intention to reimburse itself from the proceeds of the Commonwealth of Virginia, Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Program for certain expenditures made and/or to be made in connection with extension of the public water system and the creation of the special utility service 2 area. Any citizen participation under paragraph 5. will be advanced as a loan from the Water Fund. 4. (A) That the "Project Service Area" is shown and designated on the attached plat entitled "Little Brushy Mountain Water System Project" prepared by the Roanoke County Utility Department, dated March 3, 1999, and identified as Exhibit 1. The Little Brushy Mountain Water Project Area is created for a period of ten (10) years. Any owner of real estate within this service area may participate in and benefit from the public water extension to this service area by paying the sum of $7,500 ($6,155 toward construction costs and $1,345 for off-site facilities fees) said costs to be paid in full and in advance of connection to the public water extension. (B) The "Project Service Area" includes 14.03 acres (Tax Map Nos. 45.03-2-9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 13.1); these parcels to be included in the project as provided for in Paragraph (A) above, provided that once a minimum of $45,000 for these six parcels is collected, the County's current water connection fee of $2,690 would apply; and 5. That the Board authorizes and approves the payment by the property owners in the project service area who elect to participate on or before June 23, 1999, of their a portion of the cost of extending the public water system to their properties in accordance with the following terms and conditions: (a) The total amount of $7,500 per property owner/residential connection may be financed for a maximum of 20 years at an interest rate of 3% percent per annum. 3 (b) Property owners agree to execute a promissory note or such other instrument as the County may require to secure this installment debt. (c) Property owners further agree to execute such lien document or instrument as may be required by the County; said lien document or instrument to be recorded in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County. This lien instrument or document shall secure the repayment of the promissory note by the property owners to the County and shall be a lien against the property of the owners. Property owners also agree to pay the County any Clerk's fees or recordation costs which may be required to record any lien instrument or documents in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court. (d) Property owners who wish to participate after the June 23, 1999 deadline shall pay $7,500 plus the off-site facility fee in effect at that time. 6. That the payment by citizens in the project service area who elect to participate shall be made to the Water Fund. Any off-site facility fee collected on this project shall be returned to the Water Fund. 7. That the County Administrator is authorized to take such actions and execute such documents as may be necessary to accomplish the purposes of this transaction, all upon form approved by the County Attorney. 8. That this Ordinance shall take effect upon receipt of funding from the Commonwealth of Virginia, Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Program, and compliance with the provisions of the Public Finance Act (Chapter 26, Title 15.2 of the 4 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended) with respect to the creation of this revenue bond debt by the County. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Minnix, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: Supervisor McNamara ABSTAIN: Supervisor Harrison A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Cc: File Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 5 ~S ~II ~J v ~ D, 5~,~1J 9 ~~ PROJECT SERVICE AREA HATCHED AREA DENOTES CERTAIN PARCELS THAT ARE SPECIFIED IN THE ATTACHED ORDINANCE AS BEING SUBJECT TO SEPERATE PROVISIONS TO BE ENACTED IN THE EVENT OF SUBDIVISION OF THESE PARCELS SKYVIEW ROAD ~ t ~~~~o ~~ °o r~ u ~~~ g1 `N.~ER %/~ CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ~ ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA ~ EXIT #137 ~~o LITTLE BRUSHY MOUNTAIN '%' WATER SYSTEM PROJECT 1 " = 600' MARCH 3, 1999 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 23, 1999 SUBJECT: Second Reading of Ordinance Authorizing the Construction of and Financing for a Local Public Works Improvement Project -Little Brushy Mountain Water Project ~~ COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Q~~~~ BACKGROUND: The Board of Supervisors previously approved this project on October 14, 1997 with a requirement that a minimum of 40 property owners commit to the project. The project has not been constructed because the minimum participation level had not been met. Staff continued to work with property owners trying to provide an alternative such as reducing the scope of the project. The first reading was held on March 9, 1999. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: In 1996, staff had applied to the State of Virginia for a low interest loan to assist in the construction of this project. The project met the requirements for the loan, but the project ranking was below the cutoff for available funds. In December 1998, staff was notified that funding for this project was now available. The loan from the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Program has an interest rate of 3% and can be financed for 20 years. This financing would be passed on to participating property owners. _ ~~ Letters were mailed to property owners on January 24, 1999 explaining the loan possibilities and requesting signed commitments by February 12, 1999. Staff also attended the civic league meeting on February 1, 1999 to further discuss the project. The property owners have shown great interest in the low interest loan and 43 property owners have now committed to participate in the project. Tax parcels 45.03-02-09, 10, 11, 12, 13, 13.1 are undeveloped and presently being marketed. It is recommended that if these properties are developed within the timeframe of the special service area the County's normal water connection fees would apply so long as a minimum of $45,000 in off-site fees (6 parcels X $7,500/parcel) is collected. Should the project be approved, it is suggested that a special water service area be established for a period of ten years that includes a fee structure for recovering the construction costs of the water line as properties are connected. The special connection fee for properties that participate initially will be $7,500. Properties that choose to participate at a later date would include a construction cost of $7,500 and the off-site facility fee in effect at the time of connection (presently $2,690). FISCAL IMPACT: If approved the estimated project cost would be $820,000. This represents a construction cost of $780,000 and $40,000 for construction administration and inspection. Funding for the project would be provided by a loan from the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Program with possible supplement from the Utility Fund unappropriated balance. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff feels that improved public water service is critical to this neighborhood. Staff recommends that the project be approved and the attached ordinance be adopted after the second reading on March 23, 1999. It is also recommended that the County administration be allowed to execute a loan agreement with the state up to the full amount of the project cost. SUBMITTED BY: Gary Robe on, P.E. Utility Direc r Approved ( ) Denied () _ Received ( ) Referred _ to ACTION Motion by: APPROVED: ~ 2~ /~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator VOTE No Yes Abs Harrison _ Johnson _ _ _ McNamara _ Minnix _ _ Nickens k-y AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 1999 ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE 101497-8 AND AUTHORIZING THE CREATION OF AND FINANCING FOR A LOCAL PUBLIC WORKS IlVIPROVEMENT PROJECT, LITTLE BRUSHY MOUNTAIN WATER PROJECT WHEREAS, Ordinance 101497-8 adopted by the Board on October 14, 1997, authorized the creation of and financing for the Little Brushy Mountain Water Project; however, due to limited citizen participation, the project was not constructed; and WHEREAS, funding is now available through the State of Virginia, Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Program, which program allows for more affordable financing for the participating citizens; WHEREAS, due to substantial changes in the original project authorized by Ordinance 101497-8, that ordinance will be repealed and a new ordinance will be adopted; and WHEREAS, Ordinance 112288-7 authorizes the financing of local public works improvements and the imposition of special assessments upon abutting property owners upon the adoption of an appropriate ordinance by the Board of Supervisors; and WHEREAS, the County Administration has negotiated the extension of the public water system to the Little Brushy Mountain Community; and WHEREAS, the extension of the public water system and the creation of a special utility (water) service area will alleviate a critical public health and safety problem; and WHEREAS, several of the residents have requested that the County allow them to pay their portion of the costs of connection to the public water system over twenty years at an interest rate of 3%, which are the terms of the loan from the Commonwealth of Virginia; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this Ordinance was held on March 9, 1999, and the second reading was held March 23, 1999; and BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\UTILITY\BRUSITY.2 ~+ v from the public water extension to this service area by paying the sum of $7,500 4rj ($6,155 toward construction costs and $1,345 for off: site facilities fees) said costs to be paid in full and in advance of connection to the public water extension. (B) The "Project Service Area" includes 14.03 acres (Tax Map Nos. 45.03-2-9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 13.1); these parcels to be included in the project as provided for in Paragraph (A) above, provided that once a minimum of $45,000 for these six parcels is collected ,the County's current water connection fee of $2,690 would apply; and 5. That the Board authorizes and approves the payment by the property owners in the project service area who elect to participate on or before , of their a portion of the cost of extending the public water system to their properties in accordance with the following terms and conditions (a) The total amount of $7,500 per property owner/residential connection 4e maybe financed for 20 years at an interest rate of 3% percent per annum. (b) Property owners agree to execute a promissory note or such other instrument as the County may require to secure this installment debt. (c) Property owners further agree to execute such lien document or instrument as may be required by the County; said lien document or instrument to be recorded in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County. This lien instrument or document shall secure the repayment of the promissory note by the property owners to the County and shall be a lien against the property of the owners. U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\UTILITY\BRUSITY.2 ,v- v Properly owners also agree to pay the County any Clerk's fees or recordation costs which may be required to record any lien instrument or documents in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court. (d) Property owners who wish to participate after the deadline (other than new property owners) shall pay $7,500 plus the off-site facility fee in effect at that time. 6. That the payment by citizens in the project service area who elect to participate shall be made to the Water Fund. Any off-site facility fee collected on this project shall be returned to the Water Fund. 7. That the County Administrator is authorized to take such actions and execute such documents as may be necessary to accomplish the purposes of this transaction, all upon form approved by the County Attorney. 8. That this Ordinance shall take effect upon receipt of funding from the Commonwealth of Virginia, Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Program, and compliance with the provisions of the Public Finance Act (Chapter 26, Title 15.2 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended) with respect to the creation of this revenue bond debt by the County. U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\UTILITY\BRUSITY.2 4 ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER ~f °"" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 9, 1999 SUBJECT: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1. LEAGUE OF OLDER AMERICANS -ADVISORY COUNCIL The one-year term of Thelma Ihrig will expire March 31, 1999. 2. ROANOKE VALLEY GREENWAY COMMISSION The three-year term of Donald Witt will expire April 8, 1999. 3. COMMISSION FOR SENIOR AND PHYSICALLY CHALLENGED CITIZENS Assistant County Administrator John Chambliss has received resignations from Betty Dangerfield and Nancy Hall who represent the Cave Spring Magisterial District on this Task Force, and these representatives need to be replaced. There is no set term for these appointments. Additionally, Wilton B. "Webb" Johnson recently passed away. While Mr. Johnson lived in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, he was appointed by Supervisor Bob Johnson. Supervisor Minnix is nominating Maureen Woods and Cecil Prillaman to represent the Cave Spring Magisterial District, and their appointments are on the Consent Agenda. 1 SUBMITTED BY: ~. Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: C~~m,.~ ~~~i~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator -~/- ~ ACTION VOTE No. Yes Abs Approved () Motion by: Harrison _ Denied () Johnson _ Received () McNamara- _ Referred () Minnix _ To () Nickens _ _ _ 2 ~, ~ ~~ ._ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 1999 RESOLUTION 032399-5 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM J -CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for March 23, 1999, designated as Item J -Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 13, inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of Minutes -February 23, 1999 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Commission for Senior and Physically Challenged Citizens 3. Donation of a storm drainage easement on property owned by Samuel Reid and Dorothy Stevens. 4. Resolution of support for a Virginia Trails Grant for a Greenway at Green Hill Park. 5. Appropriation of Compensation Board reimbursement for additional capital purchase for the Commonwealth Attorney's Office. 6. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Meadow Creek Road Extension. 7. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Canterbury Park, Section 13. 8. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Grove Park, Section 1 and 2 off site sewer. 9. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Mountain Meadow Estates. 10. Acceptance of water facilities serving Valley Gateway. 11. Resolution on behalf of Catawba Hospital requesting that the Department of Corrections allow the use of inmate labor on various government projects. 12. Acceptance of sanitary sewer facilities serving Orchard Park, Section 1. 13. Acceptance of sanitary sewer facilities serving Orchard Park, Section 2. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Consent Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Pete Haislip, Director, Parks & Recreation W. Brent Robertson, Budget Manager Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Sheriff Gerald Holt, Roanoke County Ray Lavinder, Chief of Police, Roanoke County February 23, 1999 121 Roanoke County Administration Center 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 February 23, 1999 The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the fourth Tuesday, and the second regularly scheduled meeting of the month of February, 1999. N RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Johnson called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Bob L. Johnson, Vice Chairman Harry C. Nickens, Supervisors Fenton F. "Spike" Harrison, Joseph McNamara, H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney; Mary H. Allen, Clerk to the Board; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator; Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator; Anne Marie Green, Director, Community Relations IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES The invocation was given by F. Douglas Sweetenberg, Sheriff s Office. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited by all present. February 23, 1999 123 R-022399-1 Ms. Hyatt advised that the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority recently took advantage of favorable market rates to refinance $20,000,000 of its outstanding original revenue bonds, series 1992. This refunding was done in two $10,000,000 portions to receive more favorable bank qualified rates and will save the Resource Authority approximately $100,000 a year over the life of the debt. This, with other factors, will allow the Resource Authority to reduce its tipping fee by $2.00 a ton for the 1999-2000 ibudget. Ms. Hyatt explained that Crestar Bank, the purchaser of the refundling bond, requires that the Members Use Agreement be amended to provide that all pro~vusions of the Members Use Agreement apply to the refunding bond. In response to questions from the Board members, Ms. Hyatt repcc~tad that the total savings was $1,500,000; that the savings would be used to offset tipg~ing fees; and that the Resource Authority receives 88,000 tons of solid waste from all participating localities with 33,000 tons from Roanoke County. Supervisor Harrison moved to adopt the resolution. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None RESOLUTION 022399-1 OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA AUTHORIZING THE THIRD AMEQ~UNIENT TO ROANOKE VALLEY RESOURCE AUTHORITY MEMB63 USE AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority (the "Authoty"}, the County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "County"), the City of Roanoke, Virginia (the "') and February 23, ~ 999 125 Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the first readings with Item 4 removed for a separate vote, and set the second readings and public hearings for March 23, 1999. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 1. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to cons~inruct mini warehouses. located in the 7200 block of Barrens Roa~tlt Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Vaughn Wilb3arn 2. Ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to operate a used automobile dealership located at 7650 Williamson Roa~tl Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Hash Investments LLC. 3. Ordinance to rezone approximately 10 acres from R~?~and C-2 conditional to C-2 conditional for retail sales andt obtain a Special Use Permit for fast food restaurants and dame-thrus, located in the vicinity of Brambleton Avenue (Rout~~21) and Electric Road (Route 419), Cave Spring Magisterial Dist~rii:ct, upon the petition of Springwood Associates LLC 4 Ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit to constrr~t a high school, located on the west side of Brambleton Aven ~ west of Pleasant Hill Drive south of Farmington Drive Winor Hills Magisterial District, upon the petition of Roanoke Course School Board. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the first reading and set rtes second reading and public hearing for March 23, 1999. The motion carried by theMf€oflowing recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Johnson NAYS: Supervisor Nickens February 23, 1999 127 Assistant Director George Simpson reported that in August, 1994, C&D Builders, Inc., the owner of the property subdivided the property. The 20-foot water line easement lies within Section 2 and is beneath Belmont Court. In order for Belmont Court to be accepted int the State Secondary Road System, the Virginia Department of Transportation requires that the right-of-way be free and clear of any third party riights and encumbrances. The quitclaim and release of the subject portion of the vwater line easement would be subject to VDOT issuing a permit for the facilities. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the first reading and set the second reading for March 9, 1999. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None 2. Ordinance amending Ordinance 090997-5 authori~?ct the creation of and financing for a local public works im~r~vement project. Mountain Heights Water Project (Paul Mahoney {'County Attorne Mr. Mahoney reported that in October, 1999, Mr. Randy Grisso paurchased a home in the Mountain Heights "Project Service Area" at 1459 Mountain Heig,>~fts Drive in October 1998. The previous owners had declined to participate in the wate~;project. Mr. Grisso stated that the well on his property had failed and that on January 29~,'ll:999, he requested connection to the County water system, and requested financing of the February 23, 1999 129 Mr. Chambliss reported that MarshWitt Architects and Engineers has worked with staff to design the space at Salem Office Supply. They project that the renovation will cost $506,720, compared to the staff estimate of $425,000. Mr. Chambliss described the proposed renovations. The plans are to locate the Court Service Unit am~1 related grant function offices in the new space, part of the Sheriffs Office, and storage for the Clerk of Circuit Court. Moving the Court Service Unit out of the Courthouse is :necessary to allow the improvements previously approved by the Board which included re!Im~cation of the Sheriff Administrative Offices, and the demolition of the Guy House anti `Sheriffs Annex. The cost of the purchase and renovation of the Salem Office Supply is-:estimated at $851,720. The jail expansion project fund of $150,000 will be reappropriated,. X620,000 will be appropriated from the Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance, and the fiance of $81,720 is recommended to come from the Unappropriated Fund Balance. Supervisor Nickens suggested that there might be other property irn~that area that may be of interest to the Board of Supervisors and should be investigated k`ore any action is taken. He suggested discussing this in Executive Session and tabling~te issue until the evening session. This item was added to the Executive Session p~~cr~uant to Section 2.1-344 A (7) acquisition of real estate and item was tabled until theevening session. IN RE: APPOINTMENTS 1. Commission for Senior and Physically Chatleng_ed CifiLz~ns Supervisor Minnix asked Debbie Pitts, Assistant Director of Recrae~~ion, to February 23, 1999 131 IN RE: REPORTS Supervisor Johnson moved to receive and fife the following reports- The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Future School Capital Reserve 5. Statement of Expenditures and Revenue for the month ended January 31, 1999 6. Update of 1999-2000 Budget Calendar 7 Accounts Paid -January 1999 IN RE: EXECUTIVE SESSION At 4:00 p.m., Supervisor Johnson moved to go into Executive Session pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (7) pending litigation with General Electric Company 2.1-344 A (3) discussion of the acquisition, disposition or use of real estate for public purposes, purchase of a water system and ; 2.1- 344 A (7) to discuss a legal matter requiring the provision of legal advice by the County Attorney and briefings by staff, namely, negotiation of an agreement with the Tvwn of Vinton; Section 2.1-344 A (5) to discuss the location of a prospective business or industry in the County. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: February 23, 1999 133 IN RE: WORK SESSIONS 1. Joint Work Session with School Board The work session was held from 5:06 p.m. to 5:45 p.m. Present from the School Board were William A. Irvin, III, Thomas Leggette, and Michael Stoval'I. Marion G. Roark and Jerry L. Canada arrived at 5:13 p.m. School Superintendent Deanna Gordon was also present with other school administration staff. There was discussion on the written agreement between the School Board and the Board of Supervisors concerning the exchange of surplus property owned by the School Board at the Merriman Road site. Several School Board members felt that a written agreement was not necessary to complete the transaction, and they did not agree with certain portions of the a;~reement. After further discussion, it was the consensus of both bodies that the propos=end written agreement be eliminated. Tom Leggette moved to surplus the property and ddmnate it to Board of Supervisors. The motion was seconded by Jerry Canada ands adopted unanimously by the School Board. The Board of Supervisors agreed to pay the water and sewer connection costs for the Woods End site of the proposed high schcil and to eliminate the written agreement (Attachment D) in the item that would be considered later in the meeting. IN RE: RECESS Chairman Johnson declared a dinner recess at 5:45 p.m. IN RE RECONVENEMENT: Chairman Johnson reconvened in Work Session at 6:10 p.m. February 23, 1999 135 However, Mr. Hodge felt that it was important to list the projects so that the Board and staff know what needs to be done and when funding is available, they will have the ir~fiormation. EVENING SESSION (7:00 P.M.) IN RE: PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Public Hearing to elicit citizen comment for items to be: iincluded in the budget for the 1999-2000 fiscal year No citizens spoke at this public hearing. 2. Public Hearing on the "effective tax rate increase" as ~~esult of increased assessed value of real estate. No citizens spoke at this public hearing. 3. Public Hearing to set the following tax rates• a. To set a real estate tax rate of not more than ''lP~1 13 per $100 assessed valuation No citizens spoke at this public hearing. b. To set a personal property tax rate of not more tli~tt $3 50 per $100 assessed valuation No citizens spoke at this public hearing. c. To set a machinery and tools tax rate of not rn~re than $3.00 per $100 assessed valuation February 23, 1999 137 construct a 40 foot addition to an existing monopole tower, located at 4135 West Main Street Catawba Magisterial District} upon the petition of Triton PCS (West Main) (Terry Harrington, Countv Planned 0-022399-4 Mr. Harrington reported that this proposal is an extension of an existing 120 foot tall monopole tower to 160 feet for placement of wireless communications antennae on property zoned as I-1 with conditions. There is an existing structure and tower on the property. Access for the proposed project is via a private access road off West Main Street. The Planning Commission expressed at their meeting that this type of co-location is favorable to erecting a new tower. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the Special Use Permit with seven conditions. Attorney Michael Pace was present to answer any questions. Supervisor Harrison moved to adopt the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ORDINANCE 022399-4 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO TRITON PCS, INC. (AS LESSEE) AND OHIO STATE CELLULAR PHONE CO. (AS OWNER) TO ALLOW THE EXTENSION OF AN EXISTING BROADCASTING TOWER AT 4135 WEST MAIN STREET (TAX MAP NO. 54.04-1-10.1), CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Triton PCS, Inc. has filed a petition to allow the extension from 120 feet to 160 feet of an existing broadcasting tower in order to collocate on the tower February 23, 1999 139 said Special Use Permit is hereby approved with the following conditions: (1) The height of the proposed tower, excluding any antenna attached to the tower shall not exceed 160 feet above grade. Any extension of the existing tower above 160 'feet shall require a Special Use Permit. (2) Any costs associated with relocating or modifying the tower and related equipment resulting from the proposedi widening of I-81 shall be the responsibility of the applicant anc~lor owner of the tower. (3) The tower structure and all attached hardware sha~N be a flat matted color so as to reduce visibility and light reflection. (4) No lighting shall be installed on the tower structure. 'Security lighting may be provided on site, at a height not to e..~ceed 25 feet. (5) This tower shall be structurally designed to carry sufficient loading and the site shall be developed to accomrr~~.~ate the additional equipment necessary for at least tta other vendors/providers in order to minimize the proliffation of towers in the vicinity of the site. In addition, by exea~uzting the Special Use Permit, the applicant and the owner a~tthe land agree to make the tower and tower site available: tfor lease within the structural capacity of the tower and at reasonable costs adequate to recover the capital, opera~¢rng and maintenance costs of the tower location required for the additional capacity. (6) If the use of the tower structure for wireless communications is discontinued ,the tower structure shall be disma~nttled and removed from the site within 30 days of notice by th~:County, and the Special Use Permit shall become void. (7) The location of the tower structure and related equipn~nt shall be as shown on the undated plan included with the a~lication entitled "Equipment Plan and Elevation, Lee Highvc~y RO-1- 413C, 4135 West Main Street, Salem, VA 24153," as~repared by HSMM. 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty`l~(~~) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the ~ovisions February 23, 1999 141 In response to questions from the Board members, Mr. Harrington advised that the entrance will be by the First National Exchange Bank. Supervisor Johnson announced that he would be abstaining because of a potential conflict. Supervisor Nickens moved to adopt the ordinance. The motioncarried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Supervisor Johnson ORDINANCE 022399-5 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICA{$.w1~lON OF A 3.77-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED ON THE i1!IORTH SIDE OF ELECTRIC ROAD, EAST OF COLONNADE COfORATE CENTER II (TAX MAP NO. 76.16-1-39) IN THE WINDS03~: HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATIOI~II~:OF C-1, CONDITIONAL, TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION ~iFF C-2, CONDITIONAL, UPON THE APPLICATION OF BLUE RIDGE 1FE LLC WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on January: ~, 1999, and the second reading and public hearing were held February 23, 1999; and;;. WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a pubiii~ hearing on this matter on February 2, 1999; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided a~rfequired by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County/, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of re~i estate containing 3.77 acres, as described herein, and located on the north side of Ele~ic Road east of Colonnade Corporate Center II (Tax Map Number 76.16-1-39) in the Wirt~or Hills Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of C-1, Conditional, Office District, to the zoning classification of C-2, Conditional, General Cc~smmercial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Blue RKC~ge Cafe LLC. 3. That at the May of 1988 rezoning of this property the ovu,r~r of the February 23, 1999 143 F. No residential uses will be placed on the property. G. Architecture-the exterior of the principal building shall be wood frame with brick as indicated on the preliminary concept plan. H. An easement across the front of the property connecting First National Exchange Bank and Colonnade Corporate Center shall be made available for purchase at a reasonable cost that allows the petitioners to recover costs they incur associated with the easement. Dumpster location shall be screened and directed away from adjoining homeowners. J. There will be a minimum 50 foot buffer, containing either natural ground cover including trees and brush or planted materials, to be left on the west side of the property between petitioner's site and the adjoining property as shown on the proffered concept plan. 5. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the northerly side of Virginia Route 419 and the southeast corner of property of Colonnade Corporate Center II; thence leaving Virginia Route 419 and with the easterly line of Colonnade Corporate Center II N. 07 deg. 51 min. 18 sec. E. 380.00 feet to a point on the easterly line of property of The Hobart Companies, Ltd. (DB 1298, page 750); thence along the easterly line of the property of The Hobart Companies, Ltd. N. 14 deg. 39 min. 00 sec. W. 275.43 feet to a point on Mud Lick Creek and the southwest corner of Lot 15, Block 16, Section 4, Cresthill; thence S. 58 deg. 02 min. 00 sec. E. 256.70 feet to an old pipe on the southerly side of Lot 14, Block 16, Section 4, Cresthill; thence N. 89 deg. 00 min. 00 sec. E. 168.72 feet to an old pin on the southerly side of Lot 13, Block 16, Section 4, Cresthill; thence S. 70 deg. 50 min. 00 sec. E. 41.23 feet to a pin on the northwesterly side of Tract 2; thence with the westerly line of Tract 2 S. 19 deg. 37 min. 09 sec. W. 559.22 feet to a point on the northerly side of Virginia Route 419; thence N. 82 deg. 08 min. 42 sec. W. 222.00 feet to a point of Beginning, said property being Tract 1, containing 3.7755 acres as shown on the plat for Westclub Corporation dated August 18, 1994, prepared by T.P. Parker & sons, which plat is of record in the Circuit Court Clerk's Office in Plat Book 17, page 58. 6. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days February 23, 1999 145 additional 30,000-50,000 square feet; and in exchange for the Schools surpiusing the land, the County will provide funding for the purchase of Woods End site ar~~l pay the water and sewer connection fees for the new school. Chairman Johnson announced that the Board of Supervisors and School Board had met earlier and that the School Board had declared the property surplus. Mr. Hodge also asked that the ordinance be amended to remove #1 in the ordinance and eliminate the written agreement (Attachment D). Supervisor Nickens advised that he felt that the public record should reflect that the County will provide water and sewer connections to the new school at rra~o cost to the School Board, but Chairman Johnson responded that he did not feeil ~that the connections were part of this action. Supervisor Minnix moved to adopt the ordinance as amended by 14U~c. Hodge removing Attachment D and deleting #1 in the ordinance. The motion carric~l by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None ORDINANCE 022399-6 DECLARING A 5.111 ACRE PORTION C A LOT FRONTING ON MERRIMAN ROAD (PART OF TAX MAP NO. 9:1-2-11) AND A 0.16 ACRE PORTION OF A LOT OPPOSITE THE INTERSECTION OF STARKEY ROAD AND MERRIMAN ROAD (PART OF TAX I~AP NO. 97.05-1-1) IN THE CAVE SPRING DISTRICT TO BE SURP AND ACCEPTING AN OFFER FOR THE EXCHANGE OF SAME WITH PORTIONS OF PROPERTY OWNED BY CHARLES R. LEMOMI~ANNE L. LEMON AND CURTIS L. LEMON ~ DOROTHY D. LEMON (( MAP NOS. 97.01-2-10 & 97.01-2-12) February 23, 1999 ~~~ other public uses, are hereby declared surplus; and 23. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading was held on February 9, 1999; and a second reading and public hearing was held on February 23, 1999, concerning the exchange of a 5.111 acre parcel of real estate, being a portion of a lot fronting on Merriman Road (part of Tax Map No. 97.1-2-11), which the County School Board of Roanoke County, Virginia, is willing to declare as surplus and to convey to the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, and a 0.16 acre portion of a lot lying south and east of a new park access road to be constructed opposite the intersection of Starkey Road and Merriman Road (part of Tax Map No. 97.05-1-1 ), property of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, for two parcels of land containing 5.015 acres and 4.128 acres, respectively, owned by Charles R. Lemon and Anne L. Lemon and Curtis L. Lemon and Dorothy D. Lemon (part of Tax Maps No. 97.01-2-10 and 97.01-2-12), as shown on a plat of survey prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C., dated February 26, 1998; and 3~. That an offer in writing having been received to exchange said properties, the offer of Charles R. Lemon & Anne L. Lemon and Curtis L. Lemon & Dorothy D. Lemon is hereby accepted, and further the terms of the Contract of Sale and Exchange Agreement dated May 29, 1998, are hereby confirmed as the binding terms for the completion of this exchange of real estate; and 45. That as a condition of this exchange, Charles R. Lemon & Anne L. Lemon and Curtis L. Lemon & Dorothy D. Lemon and the County of Roanoke have agreed to execute an exchange of easements in order to provide such drainage easements and temporary construction easements as shall be necessary for drainage improvements to the properties of both parties and to provide an easement for ingress and egress over property of Roanoke County for fire protection and other public safety needs of the currently existing Plastics One facility on property retained by the Lemons; and 56. Further, as a condition of this exchange, Charles R. Lemon & Anne L. Lemon and Curtis L. Lemon & Dorothy D. Lemon have agreed to enter into an agreement for the sharing of cost on an equal, 50-50, basis of all reasonable drainage improvements which shall be located upon the property of Roanoke County adjacent to the remaining property of the Lemons subsequent to this exchange. Roanoke County will be responsible for maintenance of these drainage improvements and will provide reasonable opportunity for the Lemons to review the design and bid documents prior to the public procurement process. 6~. That the County Administrator , or an Assistant County Administrator, is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the property exchange, specifically including the conveyance and acquisition of respective properties, all of which shall be of such form as approved by the County Attorney. 78. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from its passage. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance as amended by Mr. Hodge removing Attachment D and deleting #1 in the ordinance, and carried by the February 23, 1999 149 IN THE WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (TAX MAP NO.. 86.01- 10-18) WHEREAS, by subdivision plat entitled `PLAT OF SUBDIVISION FOR SECTION N0. 12, "CARRIAGE HOMES OF CANTERBURY PARK"', dated October 20, 1997, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Plat Book 20, page 89, a twenty-foot (20') sanitary sewer easement was sawn and created on Lot 18, the subject easement being designated on said plat as "`NEW 20' S.S.E."; and, WHEREAS, by said subdivision plat entitled `REVISED PLAT S ROWING KENSINGTON OF CANTERBURY PARK, SECTION NO. 9', dated May 6, 11993, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 15, page 110, atwenty-foot (20') sanitary sewer easement was shown and created along the boundary line of Lots 14 and 15 and extends in a northerly direction outside the boundary lines of the subdivision, the subject easement being designated on said plat as "NEW 20' SANITARY'' SEWER EASEMENT"; and WHEREAS, the subject easements are further shown on Lot 18-p;1 Hof `PLAT SHOWING THE RESUBDIVISION OF ORIGINAL LOTS 18, 19, 20 AND 21, ;SECTION N0. 12, "CARRIAGE HOMES OF CANTERBURY PARK"', dated February 23, 11;998, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 21, page 26; and, WHEREAS, the Petitioner, Boone, Boone and Loeb, Inc., a~cl Palm Hermitage Corporation, are the current owners of Lot 18-A, Section 12, Carria Homes of Canterbury Park, and have requested that the above-described existing 2C~' sanitary sewer easements, or portions thereof, be vacated; and, WHEREAS, the construction of a proposed dwelling on Lot 18-A.~uil! result in an encroachment on the subject sanitary sewer easements and the Petitior~rs have requested that they be vacated pursuant to § 15.2-2272.2 of the Code of Virgin'nsa (1950, as amended); and, WHEREAS, this vacation will not involve any cost to the Count~i~r and the affected County departments have raised no objection; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by § 15.2-2204 off iEhe Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), and the first reading of this ordinance wars. held on February 9, 1999, and the public hearing and second reading of this ordinanceywas held on February 23, 1999. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supeisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the sanitary sewer easements being designated and `. Mown as "Easement to be Vacated" on Exhibit A attached hereto, said easements ha~a~mg been dedicated on `PLAT OF SUBDIVISION FOR SECTION N0. 12, "CARRIAGE HC~,11ES OF CANTERBURY PARK"', dated October 20, 1997, and recorded in the aforesa~ai Clerk's Office in Plat Book 20, page 89, "REVISED PLAT SHOWING KENSINGTON OF February 23, 1999 151 Mr. Chambliss requested that the Board extend the option to purchase for three months at a cost of $2,000 which would be applicable to the purchase price of the property. Supervisor Harrison moved to extend the option to purchase Salem Office Supply for three months at a cost of $2,000. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None IN RE: REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS Supervisor Nickens: He asked Mr. Hodge to follow up on correspondence concerning the possible loss of a post office in Vinton. He felt that it was important to be assertive in this situation. Supervisor McNamara• He announced that there was a community meeting scheduled for Wednesday, February 24 at 7 p.m. at Cave Spring Junior High School to hear plans for the new South County High School, and that there will be an artist's rendering of the school at the meeting. Supervisor Minnix• (1) He advised that he had received complaints from the people who live near the mulch grinding business who have complained that the odor has become very bad. He asked staff to investigate. (2) He recently toured the Transportation Museum and was impressed. He encouraged the Board members to take a tour and for A-032399-5. a ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER ~...~" t~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 23, 1999 SUBJECT: Confirmation of appointments to the Commission for Senior and Physically Challenged Citizens COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1. COMMISSION FOR SENIOR AND PHYSICALLY CHALLENGED CITIZENS Supervisor Minnix has nominated Maureen Woods and Cecil Prillaman to represent the Cave Spring Magisterial District. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the above appointments be confirmed by the Board of Supervisors. SUBMITTED BY: Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: ~~ Y Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson to approve Johnson _ x _ Denied () Harrison _ x _ Received () McNamara- x Referred () Minnix _ x To () Nickens _ x cc: File Commission for Senior and Physically Challenged Citizens File r A-032399-5.b ACTION NO. ....~-- , ITEM NO. '~" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 23, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: Donation of storm drainage easement on property owned by Samuel Reid and Dorothy O. Stevens (Tax Map No. 26.12-03-34) to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: This consent agenda item involves acceptance of the following easement conveyed to the Board of Supervisors for storm drainage purposes, in connection with the Revenue Sharing Program for Alpine Road in the Hollins Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke: a) Donation of storm drainage easement, of variable width, from Samuel Reid and Dorothy O. Stevens, property owners (Tax Map No. 26.12-03-34) as shown on the map attached hereto (Exhibit A). The location and dimensions of this easement have been reviewed and approved by the County's engineering staff. Staff recommends acceptance of this easement. S B ITTED BY: APPROVED BY: .i~ ~ Arnold Covey, Director Elmer C. Hodge Department of Community Dev opment County Administrator 1 ACTION Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson to approve cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development 2 ~3 VOTE No Yes Abs Johnson _ x _ Harrison _ x McNamara- x _ Minnix _ x _ Nickens _ x r ~~ NORTH A TAX MAP N0. 26.12-03-23 .149 Ac. FEE SIMPLE O CONVEYANCE B 163.42' O TAX MAP N0. 26.12-03-24 PROPERTY OF ~'~ /~'~/ ~, ~ ~~ SAMUEL R. & DOROTHY 0. ; ' ,.-'~ ~° ~ O 0 0 ALPINE ROAD 50' R/W 30' TAX MAP N0. 26.12-03-33 ' ~ Notes• ' STEVENS ~%~ ;'~ r ~ TAX MAP N0. 26.12-03-34 ~ ~ D.B. 859, PG. 387 ~ ' r ~ t ! i ~ t ' ~ 1 New 20' Drainage ~ ~ Easement, See Note 1 < < r ' ~ ' ' ~ NEW ' i TRACT "B-1" r i r ' FEE SIMPLE CONVEYANCE ' ' Corner Bearing Distance A-B S54'S9'30 E 100.00' B-C S35'00'30"W 80.00" C-D N54'59'30"W 50.00' D-E N35'00'30"E 30.00' E-F N54'S9'30"W 50.00' F-A N35'00"30"E 50.00' 1. The centerline of the new drainage easement to be i f the lowest point in the drainage area for r ~ the Stevens Property. ~ , r ~ r ~ ~ ~ ROANOKE COUNTY PLAT SIIO~ING NE)i DEPARTMENT OF FEE SIMPLE CONVEYANCE & DRAINAGE DATE: 1 > - > 8-98 EASEMENT BEING CONVEYED TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ROANOKE COUNTY BY SAMUEL R. & DOROTgY STEVENS SCALE: 1 "= 100' G: \CAD\ROADS\APLINE\ALPINEI4 n AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 1999 RESOLUTION 032399-5.c APPROVING THE SUBMISSION OF A VIRGINIA RECREATION TRAILS FUND PROGRAM PROJECT APPLICATION BE IT RESOLVED, By the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia: WHEREAS, Roanoke County Parks and Recreation proposes to make improvements to the Green Hill Park Greenway, and WHEREAS, The Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation offers funding through the Virginia Recreational Trails Grant Fund, and WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke is submitting a project application, and WHEREAS, in accordance with Virginia Recreation Trails Fund application procedures, it is necessary that a request of support, by resolution, be received from the local government. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the County of Roanoke, Virginia, endorses and supports the application to fund improvements to the Green Hill Park Greenway and Trail. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~ c,/ Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Pete Haislip, Director, Parks & Recreation Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 23, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: Virginia Trails Application for Green Hill Park Greenway COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: „~ BACKGROUND: The Roanoke River Greenway has been identified as the backbone of the Roanoke Valley Greenway system. Through a grant program from the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation funding is available for projects of this type. This project could be the first phase of the river trail and perhaps serve as the catalyst for the Roanoke River Greenway, extending from Green Hill, through Salem, to the Roanoke City line. The trail will follow the Roanoke River in Green Hill Park for one mile. The scope of the project includes earthwork to establish the trail base, a terminal parking lot, aten-foot wide paved trail, two foot bridges, signage, benches and typical trail amenities. It is important to note that Green Hill Park is now a popular destination for scores of walkers. The grant funding covers 80% of the project, with a local cash or in kind match of 20%. This is the same source of funding used for the Garst Mill and Wolf Creek projects. FISCAL IMPACT: The Department of Parks and Recreation will provide in-kind labor and equipment as part of the match required by the program. Maintenance costs should not be a factor as full-time staff is currently maintaining the Park and all facilities therein. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the resolution supporting the submission of the Virginia Trails grant application for the Green hill Greenway. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, ~~ ' /a Pete Haislip, Director Elmer C. Hodge Parks and Recreation County Administrator ~`~ ACTION Approved () Motion by: Harrison Denied () Johnson Received () McNamara Referred () Minnix To () Nickens VOTE No. Yes Abs cc: File AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINSTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 1999 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUBMISSION OF A VIRGINIA RECREATION TRAILS FUND PROGRAM PROJECT APPLICATION BE IT RESOLVED, By the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia: WHEREAS, Roanoke County Parks and Recreation proposes to make improvements to the Green Hill Park Greenway, and WHEREAS, The Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation offers funding through the Virginia Recreational Trails Grant Fund, and WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke is submitting a project application, and WHEREAS, in accordance with Virginia Recreation Trails Fund application procedures, it is necessary that a request of support, by resolution, be received from the local government. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the County of Roanoke, Virginia, endorses and supports the application to fund improvements to the Green Hill Park Greenway and Trail. A-032399-5 . d ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~,~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 23, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: Appropriation of Compensation Board reimbursement for additional capital purchase for the Commonwealth Attorney's Office. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~ ,,,,~ d~2% SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: During the course of a fiscal year, the Compensation Board reimburses localities for specific expenses relating to the operations of the Constitutional Officers. Reimbursable expenses include salaries, fringe benefits, certain operational costs, and limited capital expenditures. An additional capital item has been funded by the Comp Board for the Commonwealth Attorney that was not included in the original budget appropriation. Near the conclusion of some fiscal years Compensation Board budgets are not depleted and, upon request of the Constitutional Officer, may be reallocated to cover previously unbudgeted items. The Commonwealth Attorney has requested this reallocation of funds from the Compensation Board for the purchase of a replacement computer. The Comp Board has approved this request (copy of approval attached) and the reimbursable cost is $3,448. FISCAL II~lPACT: No fiscal impact. Approval of this request will increase revenue and expenditure budgets by equal amounts. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends an appropriation adjustment to increase revenues from the state for Compensation Board reimbursement by $3,448 and to increase the Commonwealth Attorney's budget by $3,448. Respectfully s fitted, 0 W. Brent Robert on Budget Manager Approved by, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator J=~ Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Motion by: Bob L. Johnson to approve Johnson _ x _ Harrison _ x _ McNamara_ x _ Minnix _ x _ Nickens x cc: File W. Brent Robertson, Budget Manager Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney Sel ~_ 7) S Part IV Equipment SCB9U008 -~~;~~ 99 O1 Office Total ,~~~: 1999 Loc: 161 Off: 320 Officer: F W BURKART III N tyy TO~AL N Tot CATEGORY Cst R Qty R Tot Cst Tot Qty Tot Cost A: (DATA PROCESSING) Stress Factor 2 4980 2 °4980 -~~ ~ ~ ~ 3448 ~~ TOTAL CATEGORY B: (OFFICE EQUIPMENT) TOT6L CATEGOR5370 (FURNITURE) 6 5370 3718 Grand Total: 6 5370 2 4980 8 10350 7166 A-032399-5. e ACTION # ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 23, 1999 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Meadow Creek Road Extension COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~G~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Developers of Meadow Creek Road Extension, Daniel E. Eller, Jr., and Helen H. Eller, have requested that Roanoke County accept the Deed conveying the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the Meadow Creek Road Extension subdivision along with all necessary easements. The water and sewer facilities are installed, as shown on plans prepared by T. P. Parker & Son entitled, Meadow Creek Road Extension, which are on file in the Community Development Department. The water and sanitary sewer facility construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County. FISCAL IMPACT: The value of the water and sanitary sewer construction is $7,800 and $2,400 respectively. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the Meadow Creek Road Extension along with all necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities. SUBMITTED BY: n Gary Roberts n, P.E. Utility Director ACTION Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) APPROVED: ~~~~ i/~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Motion by: Bob L. Johnson to approve cc: File Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney VOTE No Yes Abs Johnson _ x Harrison _ x McNamara- x Minnix _ x _ Nickens x J-(o 4 w w w w _ ~, ROANOKE COUNTY ACCEPTANCE OF WATER AND SEWER DEPARTMENT OF FACILITIES SERVING MEADOW CREEK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DRIVE EXTENSION .~ ~ ,~ THIS CHATTEL DEED, made this ~_ day of September , 19 ~~, by and between: D niel F. Rller, Tr. and Helen H ,ller, husband and ~x~i e ,hereinafter referred to as the "Developer," party of the first part; and the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, its successors or assigns, hereinafter referred to as the "Board," party of the second part. WITNESSETH: THAT FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual benefits accruing to the parties, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Developer does hereby GRANT, CONVEY, ASSIGN AND TRANSFER, with the covenants of GENERAL WARRANTY OF TITLE, in fee simple unto the Board all water and/or sewer lines, valves, fittings, laterals, connections, storage facilities, sources of water supply, pumps, manholes and any and all other equipment and appurtenances thereunto belonging, in and to the water and/or sewer systems in the streets, avenues, public utility, easement areas, water and sewer easement areas that have been or may hereafter be installed by the Developer, along with the right to perpetually use and occupy the easements in which the same maybe located, all of which is more particularly shown, described and designated as follows, to wit: Page 1 of 4 ~~ As shown on the plan entitled 1Yleadow Creek R~a~i Fxten~inn ,made by T.P. Parker & Sony and on file in the Roanoke County Engineering Department. The Developer does hereby covenant and warrant that it will be responsible for the proper installation and construction of the said water and/or sewer systems including repair of surface areas affected by settlement of utility trenches for a period of one (1) year after date of acceptance by the Board and will perform any necessary repairs at its cost. Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby joins in the execution of this instrument to signify the acceptance of this conveyance pursuant to Resolution No. adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, on the day of , 19 Page 2 of 4 ~..J ':~. WITNESS THE FOLLOWING signatures and seals: By: Daniel E. Eller, Jr. Helen H. Eller State of: Virginia County/City of: Roanoke , to wit: The foregoing instrument was ackn wledged before me this: ~.~ ~.~ `/ ' ~ ,day of 19 ~~ , By: ~ GCC. tic-.~. ~`'~.~,c' l Notary Publi My Commission expires: Page 3 of 4 A ', Approved as to form: County Attorney ~11~1~II ~ Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia By: (SEAL) Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator State of Virginia County/City of: Roanoke , to wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this: day of 19 , by Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator, on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. Notary Public My Commission expires: Page 4 of 4 A-032399-5.f ACTION # __... ITEM NUMBER ~"' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 23, 1999 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Canterbury Park, Section 13 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Developers of Canterbury Park, Section 13, Boone, Boone & Loeb, Inc., have requested that Roanoke County accept the Deed conveying the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the Canterbury Park, Section 13 subdivision along with all necessary easements. The water and sewer facilities are installed, as shown on plans prepared by Lumsden Associates, entitled, Canterbury Park, Section 13, which are on file in the Community Development Department. The water and sanitary sewer facility construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County . FISCAL IMPACT: The value of the water and sanitary sewer construction is $10,100 and $35,000 respectively. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the Canterbury Park, Section 13 subdivision along with all necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities. SUBMITTED BY: ~/ .~ ~ Gary Roberts , P.E. Utility Director APPROVED: ..y- ~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L Johnson to approve Johnson _ x _ Denied () Harrison _ x _ Received () McNamara_ x _ Referred () Minnix _ x _ To () Nickens x cc: File Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney ~J' $ s ~f '_ .~w45sD7 ~r~,,f~ft~" ~ °R q ~ts C • z ~ 116 P. v1 r ..I~, ~ ~ I''°i. . ccL.H C _ sc z9 J, 221 ff ~o¢+'oss~ 41 ~ fe D'9 PAF7rtRBUtjY=cti-.•.m^`~~ ~~' ~9 u,- F, O..C `:'2~) sc o< gtco~ ~ o m! giro ~'a-,-'.?I'!{7p~ gyp '`.. F9D S ~ 4 ~ (~ KI DURTr Y ~s° ~~ 3 OLO IALY AV ttcW GLENI ~~ ~ ~' 'n-~~ ~,t N~ rD ~ C 'Q ` ~ ~ . ?"J, ~ A' ~. .d m ,y ~ 2 ~S '` 15491 C. O$ NO' t°j ~ ~ 3 f ~ & ~ ~ 3fVD ..BELLE ~ ES7I; 8 ~ . v a~ ~o ~ ~ pKEO~ C:1N`l~ `s ~ 755 M.R I~ ~' eyy °'`'~ ^'90 ~¢'BU -.'QO ;' ~116ii~lEI Dq FADE ' E~ '_GG,, fi}3 9Ei$E rg•-A ~ o_a 1~ .Rc ~ y ~ F - k ~ . ,,yy 4H~GHFIEL05 RD~rC~aT p~~~ , ~ :~ ~ g p~~ ,~i~ ~N;y , ~ ~'~-~ FQSE :. ROSE~P ~ Ka'i;.'3fJv7~ w•„~{(X"~~CE_. _,_~ S Nif• FRO ~` ' # 'Y v -' ~" h lA CSVOOD I , V~.~ F- M~'o ' ~ -689.. _ _ " ~° nA tt ~ ~ ., ? _ _~ ~ ~ $ `~ ~.,: - ~o, UI CINI T Y ¢¢ad ~ ~~ MAI' ~ ~; tc '"a ~~ a ; i ^trtl ~>°F fa\ " yl.,ar rf ~ra ~ _ ~ 'af • li of a i0 d'.~f I\ P=cry A•u a+ ~(. ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Aicn aa•L i c va4 ~_ ___ aY ~itls?•*y.taMi 79 n 0 Po 4M ~v+~ yap 'i' Y M'~, ,J ~ ^ TOne9 e " °'+ ~ art! ~~,•'fa' I/ / \ `•n a. acc r • e•uwnr vFy ~d '>7 a .w a 1 .. / ~` ,4 l i Y^ _ •~~ w +~t P \ c I I y~ I:~itfC ~c nr:r 9u¢~t cd¢s ~ O II G V• r~ „i trnav a r ./ i a~ ' 5.,' , '^ J. / 1~,,5 ra " d1 ~. \ `\tt J~ ( 11' \~` •rl , ~ F° /. ~ ~ MY t a' S~.4^~, lW a ^4' ~ / \ \ ~^J ~ a 'PAifLC1 \\~ • ~ ~ \`\~~ `J , ROANOKE COUNTY UTILITY DEPARTMENT CANTERBURY PARK - SECTION 13 WATER & SEWER ;~, I ,, . . ~, D ~~ r ' ~ 2324 252g2j O ory~~ ?`~? ly ~ WO RETURN TO: ~ ~ ~, 43 ROANOKE COUNTY ~~~~ f ATTORNEY'S OFFICE t~ ~` ' !~ s~ ~ w ~`~1Z~tb066~~9~ THIS CHATTEL DEED, made this 16th day of February , 19 ,~_, by and between: Boone~Boone & Loeb, Inc.. , a Virginia corporation, hereinafter referred to as the "Developer," party of the first part; and the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, its successors or assigns, hereinafter referred to as the "Board," party of the second part. WITNESSETH: THAT FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual benefits accruing to the parties, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Developer does hereby GRANT, CONVEY, ASSIGN AND TRANSFER, with the covenants of GENERAL WARRANTY OF TITLE, in fee simple unto the Board all water and/or sewer lines, valves, fittings, laterals, connections, storage facilities, sources of water supply, pumps, manholes and any and all other equipment and appurtenances thereunto belonging, in and to the water and/or sewer systems in the streets, avenues, public utility, easement areas, water and sewer easement areas that have been or may hereafter be installed by the Developer, along with the right to perpetually use and occupy the easements in which the same maybe located, all of which is more particularly shown, described and designated as follows, to wit: Page 1 of 4 ,,~ ",~.' As shown on the plan entitled Orchard Park. Section 2 ,made by Lumsden Associates and on file in the Roanoke County Engineering Department. The Developer does hereby covenant and warrant that it will be responsible for the proper installation and construction of the said water and/or sewer systems including repair of surface areas affected by settlement of utility trenches for a period of one (1) year after date of acceptance by the Board and will perform any necessary repairs at its cost. Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby joins in the execution of this instrument to signify the acceptance of this conveyance pursuant to Resolution No. adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, on the day of , 19 Page 2 of 4 ~~ WITNESS THE FOLLOWING signatures and seals: Developer: By: As: Vice President State of: Virginia Countyh~of: Roanoke , to wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this: _t~C~- ,day of _ ~ 19 ~~ , By: Andrew C. Kelderhouse Its Vice P r ident Duly authorized officer ', Title on behalf of F & W Community Developme~t~rporatlon ~~ a# ,~ ~~~ r ,, i ' `' ~ ° ~~,~ h. Nota blic ~ `~? ~~ ry ~F My Commission expires: ~ ~ 3 ~~ ~ ~ .5 •. --F ~ ~ . ~~ ~ ~~ .. I .~~~ 5 Tq ~~ ~ Page 3 of 4 '~ ,' Approved as to form: County Attorney State of: County/City o£ Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia By: (SEAL) Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Virginia Roanoke , to wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this: day of 19 , by Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator, on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. Notary Public My Commission expires: Page 4 of 4 N-/ GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIlZGINIA of General Amount Fund Revenues Audited Beginning Balance at July 1, 1998 July 28, 1998 Second installment on West County Business Park Balance at Mazch 23, 1999 Changes below this line aze for information and planning purposes only. $7,947,047 7.71 ($1,115,300) $6,831,747 6.63% Balance from above $6,831,747 West County Business Pazk -balance ($1,057,650) $5,774,097 5.60% Note: On December 18, 1990, the Board of Supervisors adopted a goal statement to maintain the General Fund Unappropriated Balance at 6.25% of General Fund Revenues 1998-99 General Fund Revenues $103,087,232 6.25% of General Fund Revenues $6,442,952 Respectfully Submitted, Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance Approved By, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator M:\Finance\Common\Board\Gen98. WK4 N ~ CAPITAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Amount Audited Beginning Balance at July 1, 1998 $768,458.71 Amount added from 1997-98 operations per rollover policy $471,083.00 Projects appropriated in 1998-99 original budget Center for Research and Technology (100,000.00. Blue Ridge Parkway Interpretive Center (30,000.00, South County Park Development (100,000.00 North County Soccer Field (50,000.00 Police Firing Range (50,000.00 Courthouse Renovations (75,000.00 McDonald Farm (100,000.00 Dec 1, 1998 Purchase of land at library headquarters (91,550. Dec 15,1998 / Underground storage tank remediation (to be replenished Jan 4, 1999 with year end rollover) (11,948. Balance at March 23, 1999 $631,042.93 $100,000 of these funds have been temporarily advanced to the Mayflower Hills Park Respectfully Submitted, ~~.,~ ~. Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance Approved By, ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator M:\Finance\Common\Board\Cap98. WK4 N-3 RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Amount From 1998-99 Original Budget $210,000.00 June 23, 1998 Roanoke Valley Convention & Visitors Center (107,500.00) Sept 8, 1998 Contribution to TAP Transitional Living Center (9,650.00) Oct 13, 1998 Matthews Electroplating SuperFund Remediation (22,790.00) Nov 17, 1998 Demolish abandoned structure (10,000.00) Jan 12, 1999 Roanoke Regional Chamber dues (2,500.00) Balance at March 23, 1999 $57,560.00 Respectfully Submitted, ~~ ~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance Approved By, ®~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator M: \Financ a\C omm on\B o ard\B o ard9 8 . WK4 N-y FUTURE SCHOOL CAPITAL RESERVE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Amount Savings from 1996-97 debt budget $670,000.00 Transfer from County Capital Projects Fund 1,113,043.00 FY97-98 Original budget appropriation 2,000,000.00 23, 1998 Savings from 1997-98 debt fund 321,772.00 FY98-99 Original budget appropriation 2,000,000.00 Balance at March 23, 1999 $6,104,8 Respectfully Submitted, Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance Approved By, ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator M:\Finance\Common\Board\Schoo198.WK4 .... ^ ~, N .--~ y _ ,:, ~~ wp ~ .M-~ v'i O n 00 O O~ N M l~ O N '-+ ~ ~O M oo a, vl M N N N M v'> ~--~ M a1 M O O ~--~ M O O ~' O [~ N o0 M vl ~--~ ~O l~ M ~O o0 N v'~ M M N ~--~ ~ 01 (~ 00 M ~--~ ~ ~ N ~ v'> N ~--~ M ~--~ ~D O A ~ ~ ~ al M O a, 00 a\ 00 N ~ '~i' 00 01 v'~ .--~ ~ a1 00 a1 [~ .-~ N ~ N vl ~ ~ O~ .--~ v'i oo v~ O v~ ~p ~ ~ O e ~' ^' ~ Vl v'1 V) v'~ (~ ~O 'ct ~O .--~ ~O ~ V7 M l~ 00 vl 00 O ~ l~ M ~O N o0 vi M vl [~ ~O ~ ocd. Q y, y c0 a "" N ~ ~ a ~ .p N N vl ~n O l~ l~ oo O~ oo ~ M ~ N M ~O ~D O ~--~ ~t •--~ v~ M [~ N D\ M ~ M M o0 00 O M N o0 ~ D1 00 0o U ~O N N ~O M t~ vl O oo .--~ oo ~ t~ o0 00 0o a, ~ a\ a\ M o0 '~ [~ ~ N ~ D\ O N ~ ~ 00 00 ~ N ~ ~ N N ~--~ [~ ~ ~ ~ ~ vl v'~ [~ O ~ [~ ~ .--~ M N ~ .--~ 00 ~ M ~ ~ ~ O~ ~ ~ v'i .--~ vl 00 vl M N ~ C ~ ~O O l~ O O~ N O I~ l~ M ~O vi N ~O O ~D l~ .--~ O~ 00 ~O v~ .--~ M 00 ~O O ~ M ~O O N O N O\ l~ 'ct C~ M O\ ~t M v~ l~ M l~ 00 ~}' ~ N M ~O .-~ ~O O ~ ~O o0 ~O [~ O O O ~O 01 00 ~ Vl M ~O [~ 00 00 ~/'~ V'1 ,~ _ O M M N N ~O [~ D1 00 M ~}' ~ O a1 ~ D\ v'i [~ ~ ~t ~ [~ ~O v-i l~ O N [~ [~ ao O ~ ~ ~--~ a\ M o0 ~ M ~ N ~ a1 ~--~ 00 --~ ~ N ~--~ N oo ~n O O M M 7 N V' a1 M ~ a, N ~ v'i M ~ R rn ~ l~ N oo N ~ 00 vl N V ~ N a\ ~ n M o0 ~ r M o0 ^~ M ~ 00 O~ ~ ~ O M M oo N •--~ a, M ~ A a vl M O l~ a, ~ !~ ~ N N M O~ [~ ~O O ~--~ O ~O N ~O O ~ N ~--~ ~ M N oo ~--~ ~O O~ l~ ~ ~ N l~ p C N o0 ~ ~ ~ a\ •-~ [~ N O N ~ N ~ ~ N ~ vl N M M O ~-+ N ~ ~ N O o0 vl ~ h ~ O ~+ y O~ ~O ~ N M ~--~ O ~ ~--r l~ N M ~t •-+ ~--~ M ~n o0 00 ~--~ .--~ .-. M N M -~ M ~--~ ~ y ~ a 6~ '~ C~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i 00 ~, oo ~ O a\ O [~ ~' v'~ O o0 [~ N ~--~ ~ O ~ D\ .--~ ~ ~--~ O O ~ 00 ~ ~ r N O~ O oo ~n ~n oo O~ N '..~' a~ a1 O o0 O~ vi ~O N oo O a, .--~ ~ 00 ~ ~ O .--~ .-•. v'~ ~ V' ~ [~ 00 vl a\ N N ~ ~ N ,--~ M v'~ [~ M ~ N ,O a M M ~ M vl M ~ ~ N N N 01 00 M Vl v1 M vl M ~O o0 Q\ ~ ~ ~ D1 D1 ~ [~ ~ N ~ N 01 [~ N ,~ O O ~ ~^ ~ M M N M O~ N 00 [~ '~t M N l~ ~--~ M \p ~ ~--+ V M 00 Vl ~' 'c7 ~ M M ~ ~ O O~ ~--~ 'ct ~--~ M GD ~ O ~ .~-~ '~ ~ d' M O\ ~ ~--~ lp l~ M 00 .--i ~ .--~ V M I~ N •--r ~--~ .--~ M 00 ~ D\ ~ ~ d b ~ ~" .~ c w '~ ~ o ~, d P. ~ ~ 4r O ~, O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~O M O O oo O 0\ O~ O O o0 ~ M O ~ p ~ O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0o O O O O -~ a1 O O ~--~ O H O ~t 0 0~ 00 N ~ t/~ ~ ~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O~ O O O M v7 M O N O O~ O l~ O v"i l~ N V r.., W 7 O O ~ O v'i O v'i O O vi O ~ O O ~--~ 00 00 00 .-. vi [~ O ~ ~ M O '--~ d; ~ N O a\ vl ~ .--~ [~ N ~ ~ 00 ~ ~ a1 O ~ vi ~ .--~ v'> ~ O ~ M ~ M N v'~ b '~t ~ ~ O o0 N N N O ~ ~ vl V N ~n ~O o0 '~ O O A ~ ~ M .-r l~ N v~ 00 vl O~ ~ ~O N M N v'1 ~O 'ct ~ M vl 'ct o0 O M o0 N ~--~ .--~ O ~ O ~ N N v'i v7 M ~--~ N ~--~ N M ~--~ N ^~ M N U ~ ~, ~" L it O ~ ~ r..i C~ ~..~ ~. ~ >~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ 3 ~, a~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~' a~ p H ~ ~ ~ o w a°'i ao a ~ °~' °' ~ °' ~ °'~ °' va '" ~ °' Q o L y O i.. Lam' a> b p O w~ a~ a~ v~ _ v v O~ ¢ O b ~ C ~ O a~ ~ ~ cc ~ ~ O ~ :b ~ ~ ,-, .~ A, p' °' ~ o •~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ o a, ~ ~ '~ ~ '~j o 0 0 ~ a „ ~ o •~ a0i ° U o '~ o U • y a ~ y ~ a~ ~ .a F" ;~ ~" ~ ~ ~ x o p~ U ~., w w w o o ~ ° b ~ ¢, ~' „ ~ Q ~ ~ °~ ~ vOi "" ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ aNi ~' a~ a~'i y ~ 'b ~ ~ ~ ° ~' api a~i ~° N° '° ~ O U ~ `+~~ y w c~i y ~ "' o ~ r~aawaaUmw~E-~~xF-+o¢aawUawc~u:UUa:~c~Z~3o3woo~ M l+1 r"'~ V 1 M 1+~1 O ~ O ~--~ N_ _M 7 O ~--~ N M ~ vl ~O [~ 00 O~ O ~--~ N ~ l~ 00 01 O N 00 O ~--i ~ O ~ M O N ~ N M z 0 N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M M M~~~~~ Vl V) \p lp \p ~ W pp pp O\ O\ ~'- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r N ~ N d in ~ y W ~ ~ ~ O ~ O ~ O 7 CC 7 oc°. Ca y ~i ~ ~ b N U •~ 3. CC a~ R a~ o, ~ ~ a °° .r N ~~ ~ O (~,, ~ C W y" ~ O •Y. ~ ~ w ~ O ~ W ~ '.~ ~ ~ V ~' ~ `' 0 a~ ~. r.., t~ • O M M ~ M O ~ z o w -- R ~ A ~ o ~ ~. ~ ~ a ~d ~ 7 G y d OA b '~ CC i.i L" d 0 0 ti b ~I rl M O ~O ~--i 7 00 a r O~ N N N 1/ i O~ M R O H b C C~ it 7N+ N ~ N ~ y 00 N 01 y O O ^- ~ N N N P. W W W ~ t C ~ O (~ ~ L~ ~ z ~ 0 ti ~ ~ ii ~ >- V Lc. ry-s • • r :: a C ~ a ~ O 7 i M 7 ~ o 0 p p o O p o R 7 ~O ~O ~p ~p V' ~n ~' N ~ ~ W .--. ~ ~Q t~1 ~ J , 6. U L a~ y a u C u r.C M M N G~ ~O [~ N iA M ~ ~O R ~O O l~ ~ M ~ ~O O [~ N M 01 N O N N o0 O ~ ~ ~ ~ M Q~ y Ca O •r ~+ R .., L CL O i. CL ~ 00 ..tea ~ N ~~ ~ N ~ O y v .ti a °' R ~ ~ W 'C7 O ~y° [~~] a ~M~I ^ r O ~ "~ 3 .~. 00 O ~ U ~ ~ y ~ O w ~ W O _~ .3 ii U N ~ z LL ~ CC C L u ~ L CO ~ a~+ ~ Q b ~ O r+ y ~ L a e ~ W ~ ~` pp u C O v~'i p ~ u OW u = L 7 t +r C 9 ~Or O a G ~ k Gzl .. 6J 00 'C 7 O 7 CC L v C as 0 0 .~ O 0 N N of 7 N N 1n ~ ~ ~ ~ M O ~--~ M ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ N o0 ~ ~ (~ ~ [~ ~ O t~ M ~f M I~ 00 N O N o0 M vl ~ ~--~ t~ 00 ~? v1 7 V'! M ~--~ ~--~ ~O O~ ~ O O ~ ~ pp ~n l~ v~ O v~ M Vl 00 M V'f [~ lp ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ b l~ M N O~ ~D Q~ ~O ~' O [~ M O~ I~ M M N ~O o0 ~ OO ~--~ O ~O v~ N ~--~ v1 N O ~D M Vl ~O M V7 O~ N M M ~ ~O O~ N O Q~ O~ O ~n t~ M O~ I~ N N ~D M ~~~ ~--~ ~ N 4'1 M N M ~ ~--~ V1 V1 O M V1 ~ ,.., l~ v~ O l~ M O O ~O 00 00 N M O~ ~ O O ~ ~ ~ O~ ~O N N 00 00 'ct 00 O~ M M 00 Vl I~ ~ [~ N ~ M ,-.. 00 N ~ O O ~ ~--~ ~ ~-• N v'1 ~ O Q~ 01 ~ `p N ~D V 1 00 O~ .--~ O~ O ~p ~p p1 N O~ O ~--~ [~ ~O ~ c0 M V'1 O l~ O O ~ O 00 ~ ~ t~ vl ~--~ l~ O~ ~O N ~ M lp ~p ~ M oo ~O ~ ~--~ l~ O N ~t O O N 00 ~O ~n M ~ 7 N ~O ~O ~D 1~ r 00 V O O O~ ~n V'1 ~D ~ 01 ~--~ oo ~D M O~ ~D l~ M M ~--~ 00 I~ M O B O N N M M~ ^-~ N M [~ N O~ l~ ~--~ [~ ~~ O 00 N l~ M N O~ o0 00 v'i ~O ~--~ M ~O .--~ l~ ~ [~ O~ t~ N ~ N N ~ 00 00 .-, ~ ~ ~ l~ O~ ^~ ~O O ~ l~ ~O M [~ ~ t~ O~ N [~ O ~ M N v'i ~ M o0 v1 Q~ •--~ ~O ~D O N O .--~ Q~ O O oo t~ ~--~ 00 N ~n ~ ~D o0 00 ~D M -~ M O [~ ~O t~ ~--~ •-• O~ ,--~ N V1 M O~ M l~ V~ .-. ( ~D M [~ N M 00 N M l~ 00 Q1 N N M ~ Vl M N ~"~ ~--i N ^~ ^~ [~ ~--~ ~ O I~ ~ M O O O ~ M O M ~ O N O O M O O ~D ~O M O v~ ~ ~--~ O ~--~ O M S O N ~--~ O N O O l~ O 00 O O~ O~ N l~ V'1 O ~ ~O O N N O~ ~ O ~n ~ O M M O~ oo ~--~ N .r C~ N O M ~ O O O M .-+ ~ M ~ M ~ ~D t/~ ~ op op pp ~O 00 ~' M M O~ v'1 00 M [~ N 00 N .-i I~ 00 M O 1n N M N O~ ~ ~ ~ 01 ~t N `O M N O~ M N 1I) N ~O O~ N 00 vl ~ N ~ ~ ~' 1/j rr O ~ ~ ~ M N V1 ~--~ ~ O ~ O ~O ~ O 00 N N N ~O ~ ~ L ~.+ y .G .~ ~.+ .~ ~ ~ U L O ~ ~ U R A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ti ~ .,~., N Qq ~ y O aC7w o ^~ N M O O O 0 0 0 O M M N N rf OM ~ O~ N o0 O ~ ~ ~ O l~ 00 .--. ~..~ a ~. ~ ICJ •~ 'O b ~ w ti O '~ O U O o ~ N O O 0 0 C~ 01 vl M ~ Q1 00 00 ~ N ~t ~-^ t~ ~D .r O~ ~O v1 ~ ~ V') M M M .ter v~ O~ I~ oo Q~ N V ~--~ ~--~ O 00 ~O M O N O ~ v'i M t~ OM O N M ~ ~ ~ ~ rr U U w sue, C ~ O ~, ~y "V G". +.+ t~ aU+ C~ ~ N ~ Q p ~ y ' y ~ L O . U a ~ o U a w ~ ~ ~ 3 ~? ~ •- Q o o a i.L. U o ^••~ N M ~f O O O O M M M M O O O O ~ ~ ~ ~ vl N N [~ 00 l~ I~ O~ M 7 M ~ 00 vl N N O .-• oo N O ... ~p V'1 vl O M M 00 N l~ O C~ O ~ O I~ [~ O ~ v'i ~O M N 00 ~ ~ ~ ~ N b o 0 ~ i O 00 N (~ t~ I~ d' l~ M O ~O vl ~ M ~' ~O N ~D ~--~ ~ ~-+ N ~ O ~ ~ ~ O~ ~ M N N ~--~ O .r b rr nO~ V ~ "o L O 3 V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' C.~ pa ~ U rs. ~ C ~ a~i ~ C c~ bq GL ice. p C7~~WSC7 0 ^~ N M ~t ~ ~O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .~-i O O ~_ O O O O O of ~ ~ N N ^+ vl M Q~ O~ O O o0 ~ N [~ N N 0 0 0~ O M ~ ~--~ ~O O~ O O o0 00 ~--~ ~ ~ O~ ~D o0 1fi M N M O~ ~O v7 ~--~ ~ oo M O M ~ r. M N ~ O O M ~--~ 0 0 0 0 7 M ~ I~ ~ M 7 O O~ Vl ~O ~O ~O ~n ~ v'1 00 ~O O~ M Q~ N vl [~ 00 ~O N ~O M 7 ~ ~O 01 N N ~ ~ 7 ~O [~ M ~ 00 N .••~ ~--~ ~p T'-. o ~ U 0 ~ L ~~.. ¢ ~~" ~ ~+ U N • f: ~ 3 ~ . ~ G .b y ¢~ ~ ~o U L ,5.: U ~ ~ ~ N ~" w y `° w y ~, `° ~ > °~ x xx~ ~¢.~~,x ,~. .~ is 0..~ y'~ c~ '~ a O o ~av°~Ua ~v°~~ o . "'" M ~ v~ ~O I~ 00 Q~ O O O O O. O O O ~ Vl Vl vl V'1 ~/'1 ul v7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N C M N N ~ ~ GL. D y ~ ~ ~- o ~ 0 C 3 0 ~ w d C \ 9 R Gzl ~ ~ m 6~ 0~ y .rr O ... ... i. CL O L O~ Q ~ 0~0 ..~.i ~ N ,~ ~ N ~ O H U '~ C °7 y ~ C W ~ ~ O RS '3 ~L ~° a a ~ W ~ ~ ~ O ~~+ i~r C ~ ~ r.r 00 O o U ~ ~ c. '" W ~ w O _~ '~ u C/1 N V1 z ~. 'O 6J L a~ y O u E C u eY v ~ C V L CC ~' a G 'O ~ w y V L °' ° a~i W ~ ~ 00 ~ p C S7 L .+ ~ y ~ u OW y L 7 ~ .r C 'fl o ~ c k W ~. u 00 'Q 7 GO c CQ ~. C O 0 .~ b C 0 f=. I M O oNO ~p O M M~ M ~ N v~ O O O O ~ l~ [~ ~ ,..~ [~ N ~O M~ N ~"1 00 ~' 0 0 0 0 pp 7 N ~ p~ vl ~O t~ V7 ~ ct oo p~ ~ O ~O ~ ~O N Vl ~ vl vl ~ 1n M ~O O O~ N ~/'~ v1 O N ~O O ~-+ O O O O [~ ~O ~ p ~ v7 O O ~ M~~ O M N O M O O O O O ~t N t~ O~ O O~ O ~C O l~ O 7 0o C oo O O O O ~G O ~O ~G ~ ~O ~O N 1n ~ 00 t~ O O O~ M O~ 0 0 •-• O M 00 V~ M M N O O M 00 O l~ vl N M N M O O [~ M ~ M M [~ ~D M N 00 M N M 7 V~ ~O [~ v1 M O O O~ V~ O ~ M 00 ~ .~ N ~ O V'1 ~f M M ~O N N O •-r ~O ~--~ 00 00 N O 1I1 M ~O O M ~--~ 1A ~ .--~ O ct ~--~ O M ~O O O~ "" N .--~ ~--~ ti ~ 00 ~ N N ~ 00 [~ O ~ ~O V'1 to O ~D ~ I~ V O O O O ~ M ~ N M O O ~ O N O O 00 ~ N O O O O t: M O O . -~ ~ O .-~ O ~ ~~ O M 00 M N ~n O O O O ~--~ O~ ~O ~O ~D O ~O N . -i M .--~ l~ O N N ~ p 00 00 00 In l~ ~O O~ 01 ..r M M .--• [ w ~ ~O [ O p ~ ~ ~ ~ M M ~ ~ O N N ~ ~ 00 R ~ .-.. ~-. .--~ N .~ •--~ ~--~ •--~ N M M ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ o 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ., O o o a ~ooo ~o o~ooo o~ 0000000 0 00 0 00 M 0 O M C O O ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O t~ 0 O O O ~D ~ p ~p .-i O O~ - ~ ~ M If1 ~O i N l~ O C~ N N ~--~ O V1 v1 Q~ l~ O O O O .-~ M v1 pp N V 1 N O l~ O ~D V~ O .ti t~ •--~ M O O O O M ^~ oo O~ 00 00 ~O O ~ O [~ O O 00 O O I~ O O O O 00 N N ~ O ~ _ ~ _ ~ 00 [~ O 00 00 N O ~ O N ~ O ~ 00 O~ ~--~ O~ V~ M O O~ M o0 N R V~ I~ M M ~ M O M M M Q~ ~ ~O ~ ~ ~ ~ . -~ M ~"~ ~ •-• ~O 00 ~ ~' ~ •-+ M O ~ 00 O O O 00 O l~ v-~ O O O O N O t~ h O~ O\ --~ O O M O o0 O .r ~ ~D v~ O O O O ~D o0 O 00 M N b~ ~ ~ O~ O M N N M 0 0 0 0 00 ~ M N 00 00 O v7 N O O~ O 00 N O M N ~--~ 00 00 00 ~ [~ b ~ M ~ ~ v'l O O t~ M .-~ t/1 O V"^ ~ I~ O~ 00 ~ O N oo ~O ~O O ~O O O O~ ~n 00 O ~O ~O ~p ~ l~ v1 ~ [~ O~ 00 ~O O~ M oo ~n ~' O r. ~ -~ 7 v1 O ~ ~--~ O~ [ N O~ ~D I~ ~O vl .--~ N ~' .-~ 7 0o M .~ O~ ~n ~D ~--~ L '~ w U C O R L v .~ ° ~ a w U U L ~ w a ~~. ~ ~ ~ O ~ C O a..aU o .~ N M ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 V Ci ~ U , a , O O y ~ C A O a. ~ ~ o ~ °' c N x ~ ~ o ~ N ~ ~ >Q•° ~3 . ~~~~ v ° o o a a U W U o o ~-» N M V1 O O O O ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 a ~ ~ O» ~+ U ~ b ~ U ~ ~, x ~ ~ ~ °~ c ~ 'w ~ ~ O O ~ , 0 ~ ~«-~ w as C `~ ~~>~~ A ~ ~ ~' a i ~ ~ p W 'b >+ . ca C ~ ,~. R ~ U ~~~~~~o z b~ F oo L >, U ~, c c ~ ~ N U ~ ~ •~ ~ ¢' _x k~ C c0 O y ~ C WGa~E^~U~ o .~ ~ o ~--~ N M d' ~O I~ 00 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R +.+ 0 F L" C~ L N,5 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 23, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: Notice of Receipt of Recreation Access Grant for the South County Park COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~~ SUlyIMARY OF INFORMATION: At the March 18, 1999 Commonwealth Transportation Board meeting in Richmond, the Recreational Access Grant for the South County Park project was approved in the amount of $190,000. This grant will fund the access road in to the park from Merriman Road to the parking lot. This funding is a crucial part of the project, as it will allow the previously appropriated County funds to be spent on the development of facilities. Total available funds, including the access grant are approximately $490,000. Plastics One has agreed to fund half the drainage cost. Consequently, I feel we will be able to accomplish most of phase one, which includes 2 basebalUsoftball fields, one footbalUsoccer field, a large parking lot, a picnic pavilion, and playground. I hope to develop a tentative construction schedule within the next 45 days and if no major problems arise I anticipate breaking ground in mid to late summer. Respectfully submitted, Pete Haislip Director Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Approved by, Ehner C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION Motion by: VOTE No Yes Abs McNamara Harrison _ _ _ Johnson _ _ _ Minnix _ _ _ Nickens r ~p CByy®~ ~~ B `~hR C®6-11 AIL®~ VV ~~~~~A Uf ~~~C~~~LLL H DAVID R. GEHR COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1401 EAST BROAD STREET RICHMOND, 23219 March 5, 1999 Mr. Elmer C. Hodge Roanoke County P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Dear Mr. Hodge: M~ ~-~ JAMES S. GIVENS STATE SECONDARY ROADS ENGINEER The enclosed report contains a list of all changes to the Secondary System of State Highways in your county approved by the State Secondary Roads Engineer in February 1999. All additions to and abandonments from the Secondary System are effective the day they are approved by the State Secondary Roads Engineer. This date appears in the far right column of the monthly report. These changes will be presented to the Commonwealth Transportation Board at its monthly meeting on March 18, 1999. If you have any questions or comments about this report, please call Martin Law at 786-7399. James S. Givens ~ ~ State Secondary o~ds Engineer JSG/MII WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING Y 0 ~~Q w w w ^~ 0 ,0 d Q4 U O ~i U W w W ~ C 0 ~Q O 6a O ~ y A ai h bA C '~~'~ 0 F a N ~ f! O~ N ~ ~~r O G 'C v 0 ~ a N ... y y b0 ~ C O ~ ~ s ~ U C °' o °i0 z `° ~ z 0 00 N ~i ~~ ~ O 7 L O ~ ~i 6~ M 7 N O -~ a e z 0 .~ .; b '~ U 6~ .~ O i. Qr bA C C~ U E Q 3 0 U N vi N 7 O v H a 0 b b Q ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 23, 1999. AGENDA ITEMS: Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investments and Portfolio Policy, as of February 28, 1999. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: BANKERS ACCEPTANCE: CRAIGIE 1,981,701.11 S U NTR U ST 989, 519.44 WACHOVIA 992,215.28 WHEAT 1ST UNION 1,115,743.20 5,079,179.03 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSITS: FIRST AMERICAN 100,000.00 SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA SAVINGS & LOAN 100,000.00 200,000.00 COMMERICAL PAPER: BANK OF AMERICA 3,012,971.05 CRAIGIE 994,266.67 PAINE-WEBBER 1,988,568.33 SUNTRUST 3,965,237.78 WACHOVIA 992,933.33 WHEAT 1ST UNION 3,963,312.22 14,917,289.38 GOVERNMENT: CRAIGIE 992,880.56 JC BRADFORD 988,454.17 WACHOVIA 1,983, 547.22 WHEAT 1ST UNION 992,508.33 4,957,390.28 LOCAL GOVT INVESTMENT POOL: GENERAL FUND 7,441,909.83 RESOURCE AUTHORITY 1,779,878.23 9,221,788.06 MONEY MARKET: CRESTAR 11,165,110.18 11,165,110.18 CASH INVESTMENTS: WACHOVIA 2,244,972.52 MENTOR (GEN. OPER) 5,110,322.62 MENTOR (RES. AUTH.) 5,442,405.32 LB&T 3, 017, 724.78 15, 815, 425.24 TOTAL 61.356.182.17 Pg. 1 of 2 s .~ ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER r ~' "" [) AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 23, 1999. AGENDA ITEMS: Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investments and Portfolio Policy, as of February 28, 1999. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Respectfully Submitte by AI C. Anderson ounty Treasurer ACTION Approved ()Motion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To () Approved by: ~~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Harrison Johnson McNamara Minnix Nickens VOTE No Yes Abs Pg. 2 of 2 ~uixttt~ ~f ~uttnu~tQ ~- `~ ~ r~r ~ ROAN ~, F ~, L f, ~ 2 ~ J d 1 38 DECLARING MARCN 31,1999 AS Cl1STOMER SERVICE EXCELLENCE DAY IN ROANOKE COl1NTY WNEREAS, customer service has a significant impact on productivity of the business community and economic development in the Roanoke Valley; and WNEREAS, it is essential that the business community focus on the importance of excellent customer service in order to serve the needs of businesses and meet economic demands of today and into the future; and WNEREAS, excellent customer service is vital in order for the business community to continue as a molar factor in our nation's stability and growth. NOW, TNEREFORE, I, Bob L. Johnson, Chairman of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, do hereby proclaim March 31, 1999 as Cl1STOMER SERVICE EXCELLENCE DAY in Roanoke County, and urge all businesses to focus on the importance of excellent customer service. ATTEST: rn~~.~~ Mary N. Allen, Clerk t ACTION # • ITEM NUMBER ~ " ~ G~ ATA REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 23, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: Accounts Paid -February 1999 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Direct Deposit Checks $4,494,407.04 Payments to Ven dors: Payroll 2/5/99 $460,822.13 $232,030.94 692,853.07 Void Check 2/5/99 (584.72) (584.72) Manual Check 2/ 10/99 321.20 321.20 Payroll 2/19/99 450,153.10 231,205.05 681,358.15 $5,868,354.74 A detailed listing of the payments is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. SUBMITTED BY: Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance r~ ~J ~• • /v--- r~ Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) McManara Harrison Johnson Minnix Nickens No Yes Abs • ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 23, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: Budget Presentations on the Upcoming Annual Budget for FY 1999-2000. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: /~/..C. i ~ a` SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This time has been set aside for presentations to allow social service, human service, tourism and cultural agencies the opportunity to orally submit funding requests to the Board of Supervisors for inclusion in the FY 1999-2000 budget. This work session format will allow a more focused presentation that will benefit the Board members and the requesting agencies. Please find enclosed an updated listing of organizational requests that include prior years' actual payments, FY98-99 approved budget, and the organizations' funding request for FY99-00 for your review during the presentations. These schedules can be inserted into your work session notebook. The "proposed" funding column has not been completed. The County Administrator will make recommendations for funding and present them to the Board as part of the FY1999-2000 proposed budget that is planned for submittal in April. The written requests and accompanying literature submitted by each organization has been placed in the Clerk to the Board's office for review. Respectfully submitted, Brent Robertson Budget Manager Approved by, ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved () Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied () Harrison _ _ _ Received () Johnson _ _ _ Referred O McNamara _ _ To O Minnix _ Nickens County of Roanoke Board of Supervisors Contributions to Local Service Agencies FY 1999-2000 Requests FY 1997-98 FY 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 1999-00 Actual Budget Request Adopted Human Service Agencies Adult Care Center of the Roanoke Valley --. - - $10,000 $10,000 $12,480 Association for Retarded Citizens (ARC) _ 10,000 10,000 15,000 Bethan Hall _._ Y _ ___ 500 600 _ 20,500 Big Brothers and Big Sisters of Roanoke Valley 2,500 3,000 _ _- 3,500 Bradley Free Clinic 6,500 6,500 6,500 Child Abuse Prevention Council of Roanoke Valley 3,500 3,500 3,500 Child Health Investment Partnership (CHIP) - 16,660 16,660 21,600 Conflict Resolution Center, Inc. 0 0 -- -- - Council of Community Services-Info and Referral Center -_ _ - Court Appointed Special Advocate (CASA) ___ _ - Family Service of the Roanoke Valley -_- - -- - Fifth District Employment & Training Consortium Smith Mountain Lake 4H Camp Goodwill Industries Tinker Mountain Habitat for Humanity _.. League of Older Americans (LOA) Literacy Volunteers of America-Roanoke Valley The National Conference for Community and Justice National Multiple Sclerosis Society On Our Own of Roanoke Valley, Inc. Roanoke Area Ministries Roanoke Regional Housing Network Roanoke Valley Drug and Alcohol Abuse Council Roanoke Valley Speech & Hearing Center - - -- Salem/Roanoke County Community Food Pantry -_- - _. Southwestern Virginia Second Harvest Food Bank The Salvation Army _ _ - -- TRUST - - - -- Western Virginia Emergency Medical Services Council Subtotal Human Service Agencies Health and Social Service Agencies Blue Ridge Community Services - --- - _ TAP - _- TAP-Transitional Living Center Subtotal Health and Social Service Agencies Cultural Enrichment and Tourism Agencies NCAA Football /Basketball Championships Art Museum of Western Virginia Arts Council of the Blue Ridge. Center in the Square Operating __ __ -_ - - Explore (The River Foundation) The Jefferson Center Foundation (50,000/yr. For 5 yrs.) Julian Stanley Wise Museum(25,000/yr. for 3 yrs.) Mill Mountain Theatre Mill Mountain Zoo: Operating - _ - - Capital - __ Sister City Pavilion _ Ms. Virginia Senior Citizen Pageant __ _ _ Miss Virginia Pageant National D-Day Memorial Foundation($25,000/year for 10 years) Opera Roanoke - -_ - - -- -- OUTLOOK Downtown Roanoke_ Roanoke Symphony Roanoke Valley Greenways Coordinator Roanoke Valley History Museum Science Museum: Operating 3,000 3,000 7,844 2,000 - - 2,000 - 2,500 --- 4,000 _ 4,000 7,000 3,500 3,500 28,817 _ 2,500 2,000 2,500 --- ____- _5_,000 _ 5,0.00 14,000 _ _ 0 - 0 1,000 13,750 13,750 _ - 22,965 1,000 1,000 1,000 0 0 - - _ 500 - 0 0 - - 1,000 0 0 _ 250 2,000 . 2,000 _- 2,500 _ 0 0 __1,000 1,000 __1,000 2,000 1,000 1,000 0 0 8,000 0 0 2,500 2,000 2,000 -- 2,500 5,500 5,500 _ 10,000 0 0 17.608 $95,910 $95,910 $218,564 $0 $79,332 $79,332 $111,786 - 30,000 30,000 ---- 33,504 17,500 20,000 20,741 $126,832 $129,332 $166,031 $0 $4,500 $4,000 2,000 2,000 3,000 3,000 50,000 50,000 160,000 170,000 0 0 25,000 25,000 8,500 8,500 8,000 8,000 10,000 - 10,000 . - 0 0 100 0 500 -- _ 10,000 _ 0 1,000 7,500 $4,500 10,000 3,500 60,000 _ _ 225,000 50,000 35,000 _ _ 10,000 12,000 37,000 500 - - 500 10,000 -- _ ---- 25,000 _ -- 0 -- 1,000 --- 0 7,500 10,000 $10,800 $10,800 $11,100 7,500 7,500 10,000 25,000 25,000 30,000 3/18/99 V County of Roanoke Board of Supervisors Contributions to Local Service Agencies FY 1999-2000 Requests FY 1997-98 FY 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 1999-00 Actual Budget Request Adopted -- - - _ - Capital _ - 20,000 _ 10,000 - 50,000 - - - Southwest Virginia Ballet 0 0 1,000 Transportation Museum: Operating 10,000 10,000 15,000 Capital 2,000 2,000 10,000 VA Western Community College __ _ _ - - Scholarship Fund _. 5,338 - 5,360 - 5,400 Handicapped Access 0 _ 1,_0.00 0 _ _ Site Development /Improvements - 22,870 - 0 _-- 0 - - - Va. Higher Education Center 0 25,000 Vinton Dogwood Festival 500 1,000 - _ _ 1,000 Western Virginia Land Trust 0 5,000 5,000 Subtotal Cultural Enrichment and Tourism Agencies $394,108 $401,160 $622,000 $0 Dues and Per Capita Allocations Blue Ridge Soil and Conservation District _ Convention and Visitors Bureau -Operating Economic Development Partnership _ Fifth Planning District Commission - - National Association of Counties National Civic League - - --- Roanoke Regional Chamber of Commerce _ Salem/Roanoke County Chamber of Commerce _ Capital - - _ __ __ Roanoke Valley Sister Cities - _ _ _. Vinton Chamber of Commerce - - __ Virginia Amateur Sports -- - - - Virginia Association of Counties Virginia Institute of Government Virginia Municipal League Subtotal Dues and Per Capita Allocations Grand Total All BOS Contributions $1,250 $1,250 $1,500 107,500 107,500 165, 000 _ -- 107,500 107,500 130, 883 29,654 __ _ 29,654 29,614 _ __ 1,557 __ 1,557 1,557 200 0 0 2,500 - - 2,500 __ 2,500 - - -- 6,000 6,000 6,000 _- 0 0 2,500 3,000 __ 3,000 _ - 3,_000 100 500 500 _ _ 35,000 --_ - 40,000 - - 45,000 13,940 13,940 __ - 13,872 - -- - 0 0 - - 5,000 -- -- 16,806 16,806 17,840 $325,007 $330,207 $424,766 $0 $941,857 $956,609 $1,431,361 $0 3/18/99 O~ QOANO~~` ~ ,i:,, 9 "Z OJ - a 1838 ~'~g ~e s~ APPEARANCE PUBLIC HEARING SUBJECT: ORDINANCE ~_ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW; ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: CPi~ ~~~I " ADDRESS: 7~~ ~cs~ ~SY"~~/ ~aN~i/~/ v~a~~~~ PHONE: ~~0, 3`13 d ~ / AGENDA ITEM NO. REQUEST C CITIZEN COMMENTS ~u.r~c~~ "'9 O~ QOANp~~` ~ ~' z ~ o Z v a 1838 AGENDA ITEM NO. 0 APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS s©~~c~ i ser /~c~e., t-~~r»~~ Ser~~~e . SUBJECT: _ ~ k /~Y,c.ra / ~aC ?© t.~e...i^ i'S,m ~}9 ~ ~C /~ 5 I would Pike the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DELINES L/STED BELOW: • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~r?cr~ ~}~r~~ ~i~.iic~.~-~C~ 5 - ~~~ ~ ~=~~'L ~~~' ~~~--- ADDRESS: ~~, ~~ ~~~~-~ ,~ ~ ~_ /~ ~ r ~~ ~~s PHONE: ~.j ~ C~ °- ~~~~~~ ~u_r~c~~ rjc~ ~eglaest S O~ QOANp~~ a ~ 9 o Z AGENDA ITEM NO. '~ ~. a 1839 APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~ ~t /ttc,.ra / cad ?o ~.~^ i ~ r» •49 ~ ~ C /~ 5 I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at alf times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBL~ND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO TH -BOARD .'~ _ ~ U ~~ N M ~ ~ ~~ A E. ~ Cam. ADDRESS ~ `-~~( ~~ PHONE: 3y3 ~~~ ~ ~t~r c~~ ~u.r~c~ti ~~ ~e~ue5t 5 ~~ O~ QOANp,~.~` ti '~ ~ s AGENDA ITEM NO. 1838 APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS socict ~ SP_I'V~~G~ ~~~cer, SerV~Gi°.. SUBJECT: ~ ~ /~`'tc,.rGa / czar raC ~"o ~,.~^ ~ :s ~'» R9 e ~ C /~- 5 I would (ike the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW. • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. . ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~ - -~-~-- ~~ ~o ~t' ~e.~r ~ 2~ ~, ADDRESS: C 2 r. ~ ~ ~,. -~y. S ~u~.~-e ~ ©r., e: w\a~~- S~, . K. a.. l/k- PHONE: ~'-{- ~- S 70 ~u.r~cC~ r~c~ ~e~tae5t S s~ O~ QOANp~~` O ~ -~, 9 0 2 AGENDA ITEM NO. v .a 1838 APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS sc~c ~ ct ~ s er /~cc, ~~Mcs n Se,r V/~+~., SUBJECT: _ ~ ~ /tLt,.rG~ / c~aL ?wo ~.~^ i:s,ry-~ f~9 ~° /'~C /~ 5 I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: ~ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at ali times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~'fZ ~~ 1 1f~PJ ~1 x~~- Did ADDRESS: ~ ~ ~ ' ~~c~ ~ ~" PHONE: - ~ [/ ~ ._C~~~ ~: O~ QOANp~~ ~ ~ 9 Z G'1 o v a rsae ~u.~tc~lir7c~ ,~egtaest~ 0 AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ APPEARANCE REQUEST .PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS s©~ ~ c~ ~ s er /~GC, r~-,~s.c.~7c~ r, Ser V~~'a°. SUBJECT: _ ~'- cc. /tLt,.rG~ / c~..~raL ?~©c.~..~^ i S m R9 e n C /~ 5 I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may commenfi. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall hle with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~~ ~~ ~? ~ ~~%f' ~ ~~~~-(' ll (..~' __ ADDRESS: t ~ ~ < ~:.t` ~:.: ~ ~ ~ e~ ~::~ ~~ PHONE: =~~~-=~ __ ;~ ~ % O~ QOAN0~~6 9 ti~' '~~ z o Z v,.. a 7839 ~u-r~c~l i r~c~ ~~q ra~5f' ~- AGENDA ITEM NO. APPEARANCE REQUEST 0 PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS s©c ~ ~ce I S er V~crG, ~~~'r°~e~ n Ser ViG~. SUBJECT: ~ u. /7`Lt,.ra / c~ raC 7°"o c~,.~^ ~ s M ~.9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~~l 1 0 I'~'l 1~~1 C~o'~~U ~~ ~~l Y~L~~ .~ 111 ~ ~J/~/ ADDRESS: 1~~~`~C~~'~~%l"~ 1l ~~ PHONE: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~-~ etc-r~[~li r~~ ~',eglae5t 5 Q O~ QOANp~~` o~ .y AGENDA ITEM NO. '~ raas APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS soc.ict i ser /~crG, ~~mc~r, Serv~c~. . SUBJECT: ~ ~ /ttc..rcz / cad ?v te..~^ is r» ~}~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5 I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS , FOR THE RECORD. /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED I~S~1_.r~ • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE T[O THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME. Cavha; d ov~~~nr L~~s ADDRESS: /tea ~~ k S ~ 8' ~ ~.y a~e ~ .~~-- PHONE: '/fig s' C~ ~ I ~u~~~rjc~ /~ec~tae5t'S O~ POANp~F` i , -~ 9 z c? ~,, . s AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ 1838 APPEARANCE REQUEST .PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SoGict I S~°/'V~~G, ~~/Y7ctn S~°rVIGi°. SUBJECT: ~ u /tLc.ra / cz.nc~C ?y ~-~^ i:s r» ,c}9 ~ n c ~ 5 I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/IVES LISTED BELOW: • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. . ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group sha11 file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD ~i ~ ~ Q NAME: ~~ , ~- /tee ~ ~.( e ~'d ~ ~ ~ .. , `1 vc.s ADDRESS: '~ a / ~~~ ~``~ ~ 4 ~ ~e PHONE: 2/5~`~` GI' ~ ~ f ~e~taest S AGENDA ITEM NO. APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS s©c.~cr ~ serV~~c, ,~,~~mQ~ 5`erViG~. SUBJECT: ~= ~ /~-tc,.rc~ / a..r~c~C ?o ~.~^ i s m R9 e n C /~ g n I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW. • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall ale with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ,~(JS~~~ ~~ W6~~~G~S ADDRESS: ~~-~ ~~ ~..~ti-~ ~~,~ -~,b-T - PHONE: 3~-(~ ^ V~-t~ 1 O~ QOANp,Y~` z ~ ~`~`~ ~~ , s AGENDA ITEM NO. 1838 APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS s®Gict / SP_I~V~~G, ~fe•Mc~n SerVi~i° . SUBJECT: ~= ~ /ttc.na / Qe'taL ?"o ~..~^ i:s I'Yj X49 ~ ~ ~ ~ 5 I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. - ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall hle with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~. , _~` ~/~ ~ ~ .,~-~-~iti.:~ ~,q . ' ~;- ADDRESS: ~, , _._.._ 'I~ ~y~a • h `.,. ~~~ ~~~~t PHONE: ` ~'`~`~ _~ ~~:~~ O~ QOANp,~F` ~ , w ~` 9 z c? ~,, s AGENDA ITEM NO. 1838 APPEARANCE REQUEST .PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE. CITIZEN COMMENTS sQ~~ct ~ ser ~•Ge., ~se.rr°)ctn SerV/G+e SUBJECT: ~ ~ /~'tc.rt~ / cad ?~©t~.-~^i~~ ~}9 ~~C/~- 5 I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. /AGREE TO .4B/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME ADDRESS: ~'~~ -_ ~3~ '7'^I ~~~~ 2Q, ~ x.52 3 PHONE: ~~~.~?, `?~~• ~~~~~~ ~~ali r~9 ~'eq t,~e5t S /3 ~ POANp,Y~ ~ `~ ~'* 9 ~~ s AGENDA ITEM NO. rsaa APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS s©G. i ct / S E? I~ V ~~Gj ~~.e.~'ria n S`@r V/~'+e„ SUBJECT: ~ k /7~Lc.rGi / Ct.~c~ ?"©~c.~^ ~'s m ~g9 ~ ~ ~ ~, 5 I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO .4B/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. . ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~~1~'~~ C~'-~~~~ ~! L$~ ~tl.`~. ~'t~ L~C~~ ADDRESS: ~~~' C ~Pt~~ ~~~ ~u,tiT~ PHONE: '~~ ~ ~ ~~• ~5 ~~ ~u~c~i r~9 ~e~tae5t S ~~ ~ QOANp,~.~ O ~' A ~~ s AGENDA ITEM NO. '~ raae APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~'- k /~`tc.ra / a..-~raC 7°"y ~.~^i'sm ,g9 er~C /~ s I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/IVES L/STED BELOW • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at ali times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ADDRESS: ~ ~ ~ ( ~~~~F1~~ i -'l ~~~ ,` ~~ c~ PHONE: ..~ y~ .-.~~f-3 _" ~~.' cf ~~5 . ~- ~C..J. ~ ~Y.u')c~i r~~ ~egtae~t S ( p ~ ~OANp~~ O ~ -~~---~-~- ti'`; -K ~ o~ , s AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ 183$ APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SoG i ct I .S E~I" V ~GG~ ~4~'~'°7a n Ser V~G+E. SUBJECT: ~ ~ /7~'Lt,.ra / c~.-~raC To ~.~^ i s m X49 ~ ~C /~ 5 I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW; ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~ ~ a L= ,~ ~~-~ ~~-~~` ~ Q ~ ~ ADDRESS: 1 ~_ c=:.a- //.~n~,vo,~, ~ Gl. ~: ~'~~~' ~ ~~-`,~T~~~~.,;11_ ~~l}0<) {; ~'rr ~: ~~~ :~~.=~~~~ e ;~~ ~rn it a7'K eC. 4 Ji7~ 'j%~ "(~ ~ . ~ , ~ . C- PHONE: (~~ y%~,~ -~ two - ~eq taest S AGENDA ITEM NO. APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS s~G i ct ~ 5 er V ~~G, ~se.r»ce n S'er y/C+e., SUBJECT: ~ u. /ttc,.ra / a..-~c~L 7.o~^i:SM R9~~.,~/~, 5 /b 0 I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. /AGREE TO AB/DE SY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: ~ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Ques#ions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD ~ : ,_-- ~ NAME: _ I-:.~1 ~ ~V~ l ~'~~'>f'~ ADDRESS: 1~.~~fCcGL~,, V'JI ~{rt'~ "'(~~ c~ _~.~7Y'-~~(rC~'~' ` t' fir ' d,; I f~~ U~ PHONE: (?Cxrtf?14^,r \l~ f~- `.~4 f~l In ~5~14~-. ~ ~,~' ~ ~u.r~~ir~c~ I~~gGaest~ / ~ ~ QOANpk~ O ~ ~i ~ , F :>s, 9 o~ ; N s AGENDA ITEM NO. '~ 1838 APPEARANCE REQUEST .PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS .S©~ i ct / ,5 e1- V UGC., /-,~~.rr°~~a n Ser V~~+e. SUBJECT: ~= k /~'-tc.rcz / c~nd ?"© ~..~^ /'s ~'» R9 ~ ~ ~ ~ 5 I would tike the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. . ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~ C N~ L HtZt 5 (`'1 CAI ~~~ ~"~ UT. v~ I~ ifZ ADDRESS: ~I~ST~~y N'IU~r G~b~ ANO N~SfiD~~~.-~~ S'GC. ~~ ~1.)~~7~iz~V ~1~1 J h1flK~:~T 5e;v ~~~ PHONE: j2 c1-~ t::c~ ~cE i/ ~ 3~. 2 - ~ ~ ~ C~ ~~~~ ~9 O~ QOANp~~` ~, ~ ~ Z c~ ~ 2 ov a r as ~'~gtaest S AGENDA ITEM NO. APPEARANCE REQUEST /8 0 PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS S©G i ct ~ ,S er Vide, ,~,~se.rYyc~ r~ SP_r V~~t. SUBJECT: ~ k /~',Lc.ra / c~raL To c.~.~^ i S,ry~ ,g9 ~ ~ C ~ 5 I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW. ~ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group sha11 file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: vvti~Z :~ ~.~e.~ake ~l ~ il~y ADDRESS: t~ti31 l,l~~z~a~~ Au~~~~ , 5-~.I~ ~;i~nJ1-~ ~V~ Z~'~'~~ PHONE: ~ as - ~ ~ ~-~ ~lc.~?c~i h. O~ QOANp~~G ~ .9 ~ G'~ z O 2 u: a real ~C'e~t.~est' S ~Q AGENDA ITEM NO. APPEARANCE REQUEST .PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS svc ~ ct ~ s er /~ce., /-,~se.Mjct n Ser l~~C+e. SUBJECT: __ ~ ~ /f~,c,.ru~. / c'~c.~a ?wo [.t.../^ ~ d /~ R9 a nC /~ 5 V I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW; ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: 17w~~-~ ~~-- ~z~~ ~- .~~~,~ ~ ~~r a~e ~~~.~ ~~~~G~~e ~~_- r ADDRESS: ~~ ~ I~{v/tc~~C~' %31v~'.. ~c~`.~", ~~~ ~ ~. -.~- ' ,.1,..,~c:~,~~~-3 PHONE: ~~~ ~ ~ /~~o~ G~ O~ QOANp,Y~G ~ ~' 9 Z . ~ G> ~ 2 v t a 7838 ~u~c~~ r~~ i~eq L.~eSt S 2i AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ APPEARANCE REQUEST .PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~ ~ /ttc.,ra / cv~cC ?o c,~..~^ is m R9 ~ n C ~ 5 I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLER TO THE BOARD r ~° ~~zv` ~o~{s er~ NAME~rz ~d 1c1v~ .~~ ~~.~->>,t h.~i u_,~,5 ~ r~ p}/~E'G`~ot v ADDRESS: ~~vp Io~~ ~~ -~ tea. /lC .~ S PHONE: ~ ~ ~ -- $ ~ ~ •~ ~ ~t~-r)c~i r~~ ~e~lae5t 5 .2 ~ O~ QOAN ~~` o,, ,. AGENDA ITEM NO. 1839 APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS Som.•ct 1 .Sp/-V~~G, ~~-Mcsn SerV~G~. SUBJECT: ~ ~ /~''Lc.re2 ~ cc.ntaL 7~o t.~.~^ i s rY) X49 ~ nC ~ 5 I would tike the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at alt times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements andlor comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD II NAME: t ~C~, fin ~ ~ ~ ,~Z ADDRESS: Ci~~ ~~-~' ~Z ~~ . U~f3'l~u ~ L~~Z~..~~,(L XI~I-~j`~,~trn~l~'~ J~ Z`-~~'l !v -~ PHONE: _S~v ~3S -7 -- (o `~ `~ 3 ' ,~ ~< <'.,2 ~ ~~~ - ~¢ 77~ ~ `_`u"_.) ~u.r~,pCi r~c~ /~~c~,G,re~t' S O~ QOANp~~` ~ , * ~. z o~ a AGENDA ITEM NO. rsae APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS S©Gict / SP_I-Vi~G~ ~te.~cen ~S"'erV/~~ SUBJECT: ~ k /tGc.re~ / c~ct ?"y ~.~^ / ~ m R9 e n ~ ~. ~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW. • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at ali times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT~LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD ,r" ~,' NAME: ~%Z _ ] ~ ,( ADDRESS: ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~L ~~ ('C ~~L'C% I`--~~ (~' ~,:, ~~, PHONE: '7 ~~ ~ ~l ,7 ..~~7' -- ~,~ ~f~, ~ ~~~~~~.~ ~~~I. ~ohp~OANp,~~` AG'~ o~ , s AGENDA ITEM NO. O 1839 APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS .soG•ct ~ ,S e./-V~GG, ~~~ctn .SerV/G~, SUBJECT: ~=- ~ /tLc.rex / c.~.~d ?"y ~..~^ ~ s m R9 a r~ c /~ 5 I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW; • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. . ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at alf times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: r~,Sl ~ n~ v J ~ ~~~ ~ ADDRESS: ~` "' ~~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~~' ~~ ~r~,~~-~ a f~~,-~ ~' ~ . ~2 ~ ~ i f PHONE: ~ ~ ~~1 ~~c~i r~~ ~Pe~ [ae5z'' S ~ S ~~ ROANp~~~ z ~„~ °u a AGENDA ITEM NO. 1839 APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS s'oc~ct i ,5er v~~c, ~~mc~n SerriG+e. SUBJECT: _ ~= ~t. /7`tc.rt~e / c~..^caL ?"y ~u^ ~ s M ,c~9 ~ nC ~- 5 I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW; ~ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD P 2E S ~ fJ~4--r NAME: ~( K~ ~ N~ SA~xr~ vA--bK~ GJUNTY G t-4-~m r3~~Z mot=- c~mmc-izci~ ADDRESS: ~'O ~c7X ~ 3 2 . SDrt-~~n V ~ 24 - S 3 PHONE: ~~ 3 ~1 D 2 (p `7 F-Y,c~'ac~i r~c~ ~~~ nest S 2 6 O~ QOANp~~` ~ ~ ~ Z o Z AGENDA ITEM NO. `~ ~ a 1838 APPEARANCE REQUEST .PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SoG, i ct ~ .S e/- V ~~G, ~~,e•~c~ n Ser V/~~ SUBJECT: ~= tt /~'L.t/"G~ ~ c~..~raC ?"o [~-/" /:s ~'» fir- ~! /~C I~ 5 I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of hislher point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: 1 ~ ~. ~^ e .~~ ADDRESS: ~~\~ ~ ,~\ ~~ ~. C..r~~~--~~~. PHONE: ~ ~~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~tc.rlcll~ r~c~ ~e~lae5t S ~ ~' O~ QOANp,Y~` ~ w `., ov a AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ raae APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS s©c~c~ i SerV~~e., ~s~rr°~c.~n Serr~~~. SUBJECT: ~ k ,/t,~,c.ra / c~r~ ?"o ~.r is m ,g9 ~ ~ ~ ~, 5 I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: ~ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at alf times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements andlor comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall frle with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD ~ '~~ r NAME : ' ~ c~ t ;' i (~ ~ . ~ r~-~, r ~ , ~ ~ ~`)!~r"~ L" f~ (`r:~~c"d`' Lc- . ~/ _.L t 1~~~ -~ ~?` d .~''i'5 ADDRESS: /' ~ =~` ``~ ~ _ ,,~ ~`,~~-~,, =`~~~~/~~k ~ ~~ ~r~ PHONE: ~~ ~-f%~/' _ ~"~~~<~-,, i~ _~ <'-// ,, ,. ~u~c~li r~~ ~e~tae~t ~ 2 8 O~ POANp~~` ~ rF 9 ~,, ; s AGENDA ITEM NO. '© raae APPEARANCE REQUEST .PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS soc ~ ct i s er V ~Ge., ~~mc~ ~ Ser ViG+e. SUBJECT: ~ ~ /ttc.,rQ / ~aL ?"o ~..~^ i ~ ~ R9 ~ ~ C /~ 5 I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOWc • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ;' ~ I C l+ ~~" ADDRESS: ~---11,1 PHONE: ~_z ~ - J~S ~u~c~i rjc~ ~e~taut S O~ QOANp,Y~` z o~ , s AGENDA ITEM NO. 1838 APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS so~~ct i serV~~~, ~te.rr7r.,t~ S@rV/~~. SUBJECT: ~ k /~'7,c.ra / cu~taC ?~t~ te,.~^ i S m X4,9 ~ ~ C /~ 5 I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: 1~-~ G-_S ~~~~'- ~ ~ ~ e- --.~.rs~~--. ADDRESS: r~ `~~ 3 ~~=.~,~-~u~ ~ ~e r f ~ ~~~~~-~~ ~ `~ o ~ ~ PHONE: ! ~ % ~ ~-~i 3 ~ ~t.~r)c+~i r~r~ ~'e~t~e5t 5 3 t~ ~ QOANp,Y~ O ~' 9 o,, , a AGENDA ITEM NO. 1838 APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS -s"oGict ~ SeI'-ViGG, ~~h'7ctn Se/"V/Gi°. SUBJECT: ~ ~c. /ttc,.ra / cc..-~d ?"o t,~.i^ is m R9 e ~ C /~ 5 I would tike the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW; • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. . All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at alt times. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~~ ADDRESS: - V~Sc7~~Y1 0 6~" ~i~I~_ r~ N Url~~~r'~ GNC M(~i~~C'7` SQ ~~!~~, ~ 0 NI.1 E" a ~Q j~ PHONE: '3CF~~, ~79~ O~ QOANp~~ ~~, 9 G~ o~ s AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ rsae APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS .soc~ct i ser /~~e., ~~rr°)csn SerV/Ge. SUBJECT: ~= ~ /~`'Lc.re~ ~ c~nd ?~©t~-y' i s m R9 ~! /nC J~ 5 I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: 1J lC K v~Ct f~K / 1'~- ~ ~t~G- ! K CQ S ADDRESS: ~- ~ ~- s~ PHONE: F~~o~i r~~ ~'e~tae~z" S O~ QOANp~~` zr~F `' y~ g s AGENDA ITEM NO. 1838 APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS soGict ~ SerV~~G, r~u.mc~n S'@rV/C~. SUBJECT: ~ k. /tLc,.rC~ / can caC ?"o ~.e..~^ i s m $9 ~ ~ ~ ~ 5 I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/IVES LISTED BELOW. • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. . ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at alf times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~~ i ~ ~~GG~l27~c-c~'z =-l ~~- ti,J~~~~ G..~i,~'rdz 1 } ~ ,J ADDRESS: _ l ~~~~ -~p-~~~~ c~-~;;~~, ~'~' ~~Gfi~ PHONE: ,S'~C~ - 2-~- << ~/ Z-~ 1~ L-~-----.-._~ -~.+~/ a, o,, .. s AGENDA ITEM NO. 783$ APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS soc i ct ~ .S ei- V ~~G.~ /~~~'r°)ce n Ser 1~iG~. SUBJECT: ~ k /tLc.rca l a..~ct ?'©c,~.~^ i ~ m ,g9 ,o ~ C ~• 5 I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW. • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ADDRESS: v~~ ~~~- ~~ ~~ (~~ ~ o "~ lr-r ~v PHONE: 3~k~- - S~ ~7~ ~t,~r~c~ir~.9 ~e~tae5t 5 3y O~ QOANp,Y~` ~ ~ c~ g . s AGENDA ITEM NO. 1838 APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS sc~c ~ ct i s er V ~~e,, ~se.n-pct n Se r v~ ~+e. SUBJECT: ~= tt /t~,c,.ra / c~.n d ?o ~.a..~^ i S ,~-~•~ X49 a r~ C /~ 5 I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW; ~ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ ^ ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall ale with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~~ S ,~~-.~i~. ~ Con,~l'cr /~CSoI ,o,~ C~K~~r ADDRESS: .3f~38 ~~ j~'4-,-~ C ~'~c-le PHONE: `?'&'9-3®s9 ~~'~ ~ ~~..~ - 7693 ~`~-' O~ ~OANp,~~` ~ w o~ a Z AGENDA ITEM NO. Q 183$ APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~= k /ttc.ra / cc..~-~r.~t ?"o ,r.~.~^ is ~ X49 e n C /~ 5 I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. . ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall hIe with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: t l ~Zi~.- l~ ~ e ~ ~ ~ ~c.~-.~~~... ADDRESS: ~~ ~d'~'"l~ ~ ~ (Z 0 ~~ wd t ce. .~-ylo ~ ~,~ ""` ra /c ~_ 2 ~ v n j CwfC~ PHONE: GZft- Z Z ~ ly~z ~ w ~~ L ~"-7.~r~c~~r~c~ ~egtae~t 5 ~3~ O~ p~OANp,Y~ E ~ ~ ~' 9 g , a AGENDA ITEM NO. Q reae APPEARANCE REQUEST .PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS soc.~ct ~ SerV~ce., ~~,e.r»c~n SerVi~~e, SUBJECT: ~=- a /~'tc.rQ / cc.~d ?"© ~..~^ ~ s rye R9 e ~ C ~. 5 I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TD THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE' GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. . ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at ali times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~i ~rS r 1 r~ ~ ~.~ ~ ~ s ~ ADDRESS: ~7~~ CI~~tSrJ~a-~ .~/~ ~~C-- PHONE: 3yS^-9~ b`Y ~ ~,/0 /S O~ QOANOk~` L 'J ~ ~L ~ c..l c J 4 ~+ ' ~ ~~ o,, ; s AGENDA ITEM NO. reae APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS soG i cr ~ S er V ~GGj ~~mc~ n S'er ViC+e. SUBJECT: ~'• u. /ttc~.ra / c~caC ?~©t~...~^ i ~ ry-~ X49 ~ r~C ~ 5 I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at alf times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~j2,QDL~`~ ~C~EL GLINtc- - Nt i KC W - LL(AM S ADDRESS: ~ 2-`~a `l~ ~2n S ~ ~ll~E ~/~- 2 ~a j ~ PHONE: 3~~' S(S"7 O~ POANO,Y~4 ~ , 9 Z Z ov a raas ~t.,c_r~c~l i rj~ ~ec~ tae5t 5 AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS sc~~ict ~ serV•cre., ~~r»an serV/G~. SUBJECT: ~=- ~t /y`Lc~.rt~ / c~caL ?"o ~.d...~^ is rye R y ~ n C ~ s I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TD AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements andlor comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall frle with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LE IBLY AND GIVE TO HE CLERK O THE BOARD NAME: i~ • ~ ,,,.~ Vq- `'~'--- ADDRESS: / I S ~, ~ , ~~~%nbNN1~, PHONE: g~3 ~ a ~t.~.r~~+Cir7c~. ,~egtae5t5 .39 O~ QOANp~~` z " ~ ~ 2 AGENDA ITEM NO. '~ v .a 1839 z APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS .s©c. i cwt ~ .5 e1- V i~C, d-,/ae.~"ric.~ n Se r V ~ ~+e. SUBJECT: ~ ~ /~`'tc.rQ l cc,~caL ?o ~e.-~^ ~ s rye ~~ ~ nC /~ 5 I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/IVES L/STED BELOW: • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. . ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~~~~2k. _~ ~~~ i""l ~~~~ 1tii /c~ /`rte; ~~ v~e~~ ~ c~.~ c~u/t C~w~ ~ r/~a ~ ~~7Y~ ADDRESS: ~/ U r~ ~i ~L~/~i r o~fJ /2y .r /~ ~ ~ /2c~~/~v !~-~ ~ PHONE: ~S^yy~ f ~ -- ~ ~ C ~tc.nc.~i t~r~ ~~q taut S O~ POANp~~` ti~ 9 z.:. ~ o,, . s AGENDA ITEM NO. 1838 APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS soc. i ct ~ s er V•~G, ~41ria n Ser V/G~ SUBJECT: ~' ~ /tGc,.re~ / c~c.~t ?~© tit.-~^ i S,r» x,19 a nC /~ 5 I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN/ CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW; • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. . ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD .J S. NAME: ~`~' C~J ~i~~~~-~J ~, ADDRESS: /< / / ,~ f/1:= fu ~,~ ,Da ft-rt- ~~ F PHONE: ;3 `~ 2-- ~~ I / ~u-~clir~r~ ~egtae~t5 ~2 O~ ~OANp,Y~G ~, 9 G~ o s AGENDA ITEM NO. '~ rsae APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS Soc~ct ~ ,serV~GC, ~te.Mc~n Ser'V/G~. SUBJECT: ~ ~ /~''~.rex / c~.~aL To[~.~^isM ~49enC/~ 5 I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW; • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at ali times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD a NAME: C ~ ~~ ~ ~ _. ~ ~ ~, Y ,,~ ADDRESS: ~~ 1 ; ~~ ~`~ <, ~, ~`~~ ~ I E ~~ ~~,r~~' ~ y `~ -~ , PHONE: - ~~ -..~ ._. ~tc.r~c;Il ~ ~~ ~eq,c.aest 5 ~i ROANp,Y O~ •~ ~` Fp ~ . „ : "~ 9 .~. ~. 2 g ? a AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ 1838 APPEARANCE REQUEST .PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS so~,icr ~ serV~crG, ~urr°~ctn SerVi~~. SUBJECT: ~ k /~',tc,.rc~ / c~c~L ?o t-~..~^ i's,iy~ R9 a ~C' l~ 5 I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at al(times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT. LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~_, _ ~ t ~,rl ADDRESS: ~ ~ ~~~. ~_ ~~ ~~~,~;~ ~t , ~~ PHONE: "i ~~~,~ ~~ e ~ - ~ ~: 4 ~ O~ QOANp,~~` z G> o V .a 1838 ~-5t '~~ f V~U~t ~,~~-~V ~Gc.r)clli r~c~ /~egG1e5t' ~ ~7~ S ~'~~~, L` f-- ~~~~ ------~ --~ AGENDA ITEM NO. APPEARANCE REQUEST .PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS svc ~ ct ~ .S eo-r 1/'~~G, .~,<<,e.Mc~ n S,e r V/G+°~. SUBJECT: _ ~ ~ /ttc.rc~ / ct.~r d ?"®ta.~^ ~ s m •c}9 ~ n ~ ~. 5 I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ADDRE PHONE: PRESENTATION TO ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MARCH 23, 1999 Mr. Chairman, Board Members, Mr. Hodge and other members of the staff, I am Bob Slaughter, Chairman of the National D-Day Memorial Foundation Board of Directors. I live at 4372 Kirkwood Drive in Roanoke County. Thank you for the opportunity to speak to you today and give you a brief update on the Foundation's accomplishments. Thank you also for the wonderful $30,000 in support the County has already provided to the efforts of the Foundation. The National Memorial to D-Day has received the gracious support of all the local governments within the Roanoke- Bedford-Lynchburg region. Let me take a moment to review the region support with you so you know that Roanoke County does not stand alone: Jurisdiction Pledged Donated-to-Date 1. Roanoke County $ 30,000 $ 30,000 2. Town of Vinton 5,000 5,000 3. City of Salem 250,000 150,000 4. City of Roanoke 250,000 150,000 5. Botetourt County 50,000 10,000 6. Bedford County 500,000 400,000 7. City of Bedford 255,844 188,836 8. City of Lynchburg 100,000 100,000 9. Campbell County 50,000 20,000 10. Town of Altavista 15,000 10,000 11. Amherst County 50,000 -------- 30,000 -------- Totals: -------- $1,555,844 -------- $1,093,836 Again, thank you for your support in the efforts of the National D-Day Memorial. Allow me to call upon the Foundation's Executive Director, Richard Burrow, to provide the Board of Supervisors with some additional information. This past year, 1998, was a good year for the National D-Day Memorial Foundation. As the charts I have just distributed show, the Foundation through December, 1998, had raised $7.75 million of the $12 million necessary to complete the construction of the entire Memorial Complex. With the most recent help of the Virginia General Assembly, and others, the total now has reached $8.2 million. This funding ensures that the Monument containing the OVERLORD Arch will be built. The listing attached to the fund-raising chart shows some of the companies, foundations, and individuals that have participated in the pledges and donations received to date. The remaining $4 million is primarily needed to fund the construction of the 33,000 square foot Education Center. Initial construction work on the 88-acre site of National Memorial to D-Day is complete. The Foundation has already fully funded site acquisition; architectural and engineering design; graded and relocated 475,000 cubic yards of earth and rock; installed three miles of underground pipe for water, sewer, and storm drainage; as well as, built one mile of new two-lane roadway, including curb and gutter. The Foundation has ordered (and paid for most of) the granite necessary to cover the OVERLORD Arch and surrounding plaza from Cold Springs Quarry in Minnesota. The Foundation has also contracted for (and paid for most of) the preparation often pieces of sculpture planned for the laza and center reflecting pool. The next phases oftconstruction will be bid in April 1999, with construction scheduled to start in May. Though presently concerned with facilities construction, the National D-Day Memorial Foundation has nevertheless engaged in some meaningful educational programming in the region. Two of this autumn's public history initiatives are particularly noteworthy. In partnership with the Bedford Public Library system, the Foundation presented "From Rosie to Roosevelt," a six-part series on the American homefront during World War II. Supported by generous grants from the American Library Association and National Video Resources, this series provided a range of documentary films and contextual discussions for weekly audiences. In partnership with Lynchburg College's Center for Central Virginia History and Culture, the Foundation also took the lead in planning and presenting atwo-month series of oral history programs called "Homefront, Frontline, Homecoming," which focused on the contributions of the citizen-soldier to the Allied victory. The audience for this series consisted of college students, high-school teachers, and, as space permitted, regional citizens. The audience for each session numbered around two hundred. The Foundation practices a financial policy of full disclosure. A copy of the Foundation's latest audit and IRS Form 990 (for year ended June 30, 1998) were mailed to Roanoke County and all regional local governments on December 10, 1998. We are proud of our accomplishments but we will continue to work hard to ensure the construction of the Education center. The National D-Day Memorial continues to need the help of Roanoke County. Please consider a generous funding in next year's budget. Thank you! Bob Slaughter and I would be pleased to answer any questions you may have. 1 i .lam N~T'IONAL ~-~ MEMORIAT . ~o olv ~~ 1 1 Site Acq 3.0% $ o.~.M 10.0% $1.2M Summary of Construction Qudget December, 1998 Total: $ ~ 2,000,000 Elements of budget completed * * Under Construction NATIONAL D-DAY MEMORIAL DESCRIPTION OF MAJOR PLEDGES AND DONATIONS DECEMBER, 1998 Percentage Total Description of total Donation Major Contributors (in Millions) 1. States 36.8 % $ 2.85 M Commonwealth of Virginia 2. Municipalities 20.0 % $ 1.55 M City of Roanoke City of Salem City of Lynchburg City of Bedford Bedford County 3. Individuals 18.8 % $ 1.45 M Dr. Tom Nygaard Mrs. Mary Jackson 12 Anonymous Gifts 29th Division Association 2,561 Other Gifts 4. Corporations 18.2 % $ 1.40 M Creative Associates Barr Laboratories, Inc. Framatome Technologies Georgia-Pacific Corporation The Walt Disney Company 5. Foundations 6.2 % $ 0.50 M Scripps Howard Foundation Elks National Foundation Hallmark Corporation Fdn. Landmark Communications Fdn. The English Foundation TOTALS: 100.0 % $ 7.75 M NATIONAL D-II~1Y IV~[vIORIAL FOi7rIDATiON Education Center Exhibition Space Description of_ Exhibit Space Cost 1. Charles M. Schulz Gaiiery of WV1/II Cartoon Art $1,000,000 2. Robert Wood Johnson Gallery of WWII Medicine $1,000,000 3. Gallery of WWII Clergy $1,000,000 4. C>veriord Exhibits $1,000,000 Total $4,a00,t3Q4 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 1999 ORDINANCE 032399-17 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO THE ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD TO CONSTRUCT A HIGH SCHOOL TO BE LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF BRAMBLETON AVENUE, WEST OF PLEASANT HILL DRIVE, SOUTH OF FARMINGTON DRIVE (TAX MAP NOS. 76.20-6-16, 86.07-1-1, 86.08-4-33 ), WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, the Roanoke County School Board has filed a petition to construct a high school to be located on the west side of Brambleton Avenue, west of Pleasant Hill Drive, south of Farmington Drive (Tax Map Nos. 76.20-6-16, 86.07-1-1, 86.08-4-33) in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 2, 1999; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on February 23, 1999; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on March 23, 1999. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to the Roanoke County School Board to construct a high school to be located on the west side of Brambleton Avenue, west of Pleasant Hill Drive, south of Farmington Drive (Tax Map Nos. 76.20-6-16, 86.07-1-1, 86.08-4-33) in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1999 Community Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.2-2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved with the 1 (1) Development of the Woods End property will be guided by the Concept Plan and Concept Diagram prepared by SFCS and dated 1/25/99. Site facilities shown on the Concept Plan may be located and expanded within the general areas portrayed on the Concept Diagram. All proposed recreation areas shall be passive field areas with the exception of proposed track, baseball/softball field, and tennis courts. Parking may be provided for the recreation areas. The tennis courts may be relocated to any designated recreation area. nl..,.,,,...,.a 1 1:11 n..:.. ..a.....,.:...., ..r n..at,...~ TL... .,. n.....,.1 a al,. •a f IGQJQI It I II1I VTT .. r (2) {3~} An area of the site as generally shown on a conceptual plan entitled Mudlick Regional Storm water Management Facility and dated March 2, 1999 shall be reserved and permanently set aside by easement for the possible development of a regional Storm water detention facility. Only passive recreational facilities, the shown access road, and a green way shall be allowed within this general area. (3) {~-} A minimum 30 foot wide area along the entire length of Mudlick Creek from Canter Drive to Farmington Drive shall be set aside and reserved 2 other suitable instrument for a possible future green way on the property. The exact location of this green way area will be determined at site plan review and approval. (4) {-5~ If a regional Storm water detention facility is constructed on this property, construction of the facility shall incorporate the installation of a paved 10 foot wide green way trail along the entire length of the above referenced green way easement area. (5) {fr1 Final site plans for the property shall show all required screening and buffering areas as required by the Roanoke County zoning ordinance. (6) {8~ A minimum of 550 parking spaces shall be provided on the site . 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor McNamara to adopt the ordinance with change to Condition #1, and deletion of Conditions #2 and #7, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Johnson NAYS: Supervisor Nickens 3 A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Terry Harrington, County Planner John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Dr. Deanna Gordon, School Superintendent Brenda Chastain, Clerk, School Board 4 RO~N~~E UflUN7'Y ~~~?~T~.~'NT t3~' ~~©ds E~.d Schaaf 5~~~ Ct~t~1'~Ut~I~'TY 1~~`V~'LQ.t~~~f.~'1VT S~ec^.c¢l Use ~$r~xit 8S. f}7-1-1, 76.2}-~-1, ~6.0~-~-3~ i #~ ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 23, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: Second reading of an ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit to construct a high school, located on the west side of Brambleton Avenue, west of Pleasant Hill Drive, south of Farmington Drive, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the petition of Roanoke County School Board. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Recommend approval of the School Board's request for a special use permit. We should continue efforts to improve our plans for a primary access to the site. We should also work with the school administration to solve stormwater management issues in that area and, further downstream. S-II ~-' ~ PETITIONER: ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD CASE NUMBER: 12-3/98 Planning Commission Hearing Date: March 2, 1999 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: March 23, 1999 A. REQUEST Petition of Roanoke County School Board to obtain a Special Use Permit to construct a high school, located on the west side of Brambleton Avenue, west of Pleasant Hill Drive, south of Farmington Drive, Windsor Hills Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS Approximately fourteen citizens spoke at the hearing. Comments in favor of the request focused on the need for a new high school, the appropriateness of the Woods End site, and the need to move quickly with the school's construction. Citizens who expressed concern over the request cited issues including (1) School Board should use the Merriman site since it has already been purchased, (2) the inappropriateness of Pleasant Hill Drive being the only access and the resultant traffic and congestion impacts on the Pleasant Hill and Kingston Court property owners, (3) possible safety and security issues at the AME Church, (4) the proximity of the recreation areas (including tennis courts) to the homes on Brentwood Court and the noise, lighting and activity impacts resulting from the community's use of these facilities and (5) decreased property values as a result of the construction of the school and recreation areas and the resultant traffic impacts on Pleasant Hill. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Commission inquired whether or not the anticipated road improvements will require a change in the existing grade of Pleasant Hill Drive between Brambleton and Chippenham. Jack Ellinwood responded that no changes in the grade will be required. He stated that maximum grade of Pleasant Hill was 12-13 °~ for a short distance. Mr. Ellinwood stated that the proposed traffic signal would be approximately 800 feet from the closest existing signal. The general VDOT standard for the separation of traffic signals is 1000 feet. There was a general discussion of anticipated peak hour traffic flows. Mr. Robinson said that SW County is in need of a school and he will be supporting the request. Mr. Witt noted his concern with parking conditions that exist at Cave Spring High School and asked that conditions be considered so there is no parking in the neighborhoods. D. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS 1)The site will be developed in general conformance with the Concept Plan and Concept Diagram prepared by SFCS and dated 1/25/99. Site facilities shown on the Concept Plan may be located and expanded within the general areas portrayed on the Concept Diagram. All proposed recreation areas shall be passive field areas with the exception of proposed track, baseball/softball field, and tennis courts. Parking may be provided for the recreation areas. The tennis courts may be relocated to any designated recreation area. ~' 2 ~ 2) Vehicular access to the site shall be limited to either an extension of Pleasant Hill Drive or an extension of Arthur Thurman Road to the site. Holland Road may be extended to provide for emergency service vehicles only. A gate or other means shall be provided to ensure that non-emergency traffic does not access the site from this route. The existing private drive from Farmington Drive serving the single family home on the property shall be closed to vehicular traffic, but may be used for pedestrian access to the recreation areas. 3) An area of the site as generally shown on a conceptual plan entitled Mudlick Regional stormwater Management Facility and dated March 2, 1999 shall be reserved and permanently set aside by easement for the possible development of a regional stormwater detention facility. Only passive recreational facilities, the shown access road, and a greenway shall be allowed within this general area. 4) A minimum 30 foot wide area along the entire length of Mudlick Creek from Canter Drive to Farmington Drive shall be set aside and reserved by easement or other suitable instrument for a possible future greenway on the property. The exact location of this greenway area will be determined at site plan review and approval. 5) If a regional stormwater detention facility is constructed on this property, construction of the facility- shall incorporate the installation of a paved 10 foot wide .greenway trail along the entire length of the above referenced greenway easement area. 6) Final site plans for the property shall show all required screening and buffering areas as required by the Roanoke County zoning ordinance. 7) All site lighting proposed for the property shall comply with the Roanoke County zoning ordinance and shall not exceed .5 foot candles at adjoining property lines. 8) A minimum of 550 parking spaces shall be provided on the site . E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Thomason moved to recommend approval of the petition with conditions. He stated that he hoped that the school board would also consider the installation of perimeter fencing, where needed, to solve potential security, access, and parking problems if and when the need arises. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Thomason, Witt, Robinson, Hooker NAYS: None ABSENT: Ross F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map. _ Staff Report _ Other `~~ Terrance Har ' gton;,8'ecretary Roanoke C my Planning Commission S- STAFF REPORT PART I PETITION: Roanoke County School Board PREPARED BY: T. Harrington FILE NO.: 12- 3/99 DATE PREPARED: 2/25/99 A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A new high school is proposed on a 69 + acre site in Southwest Roanoke County. Access to the proposed school is to be via Pleasant Hill Drive off of Brambleton Ave. Development of the school site will include a 155,000-180,000 square foot school building, and associated parking and recreational areas. The potential exists to include a regional stormwater detention facility on the site, as well as a vital link in the Roanoke Valley greenway system. The project conforms to the future land use guide contained in the 1998 Roanoke County Community Plan, and also conforms to many of the plans design and land use guidelines. B. DESCRIPTION This is a request of the Roanoke County School Board for a Special Use Permit to allow the construction of a new public high school in southwest county. The site selected by the School Board for the new school is known as "Woods End". The 69 + acre tract comprises three separate lots and is located generally west of Brambleton Avenue, west of Pleasant Hill Drive, and South of Farmington Drive in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. The property is zoned R-1 Single Family Residential. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Public and private primary and secondary schools are permitted by Special Use in R- 1zoning districts. As a part of the Special Use Permit process the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors evaluate the proposed use and make findings pertaining to the conformance of the use with the Roanoke County Community Plan. In addition, the Commission and Board evaluate the proposed site design to insure the design of the site, and the subsequent operation of the proposed use, do not negatively impact surrounding or nearby property owners. The Commission may recommend, and the Board may attach, any conditions to the permit related to the use and design of the site. Site plan review and approval will be required prior to the commencement of any construction on the site. Site plan review will ensure that this project complies with all county codes including zoning standards for items such as parking, lighting, screening and setbacks. Because of the large scale of the proposed project, it is likely that grading and erosion and sedimentation control plans will be approved, and grading will commence, prior to approval of final site development plans. The Virginia Department of Transportation will need to issue commercial entrance permits for this project prior to construction. All proposed public road and intersection improvements are subject to VDOT approval. PART II A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Zo~r~phy and Drainaae The property lies within the Mudlick Creek drainage basin. The creek traverses the southern portion of the site in a southwest/northeast direction. A small farm-type pond is on the western side of the property in proximity to the creek. Elevations on the site vary by as much as 130 feet. Most of the property, including the highest elevations, is on the western side of Mudlick Creek. From the south, near Pleasant Hill Drive, the property falls approximately 50 feet to the creek bed. Mudlick Creek lies within a 100-year floodplain as designated by FEMA. The recently completed and adopted Roanoke Valley Regional Stormwater Management Plan has designated a portion of this site, along Mudlick Creek as a desirable location for a regional stormwater management detention facility. Vegetation The site is a combination of mixed woodlands and pasture-type areas. Most of the wooded areas are located along the western portion of the site and along the Mudlick Creek floodplain/stream bed that traverses the property. 2 `.¢~~ l and l/_VY The site is primarily undeveloped with the exception of a single family home near the southwestern corner of the property and several small out buildings. The existing single family home is near the rear property line of homes located along Grape Tree Lane. A_cces~_anrl_SLaf_f_ic ~it_c~la~ion Current access for the single family home on the site is from a private drive off of Farmington Drive. This private drive is adjacent to the Kingston Court homes along Brentwood Court. The site borders, or is in close proximity to, other public right-af-ways, including Canter Drive, Lakeland Road, and Arthur Thurman Drive, a paper street off of Pleasant Hill Drive. SurrQUnding _N~~ghb~rhQOSi The site is bordered on all sides by existing single family subdivisions. Approximately 47 single family lots/homes border the site. These lots and homes are located in the Canterbury Park, Nottingham Hills, Kingston Court, and Nichols Estates subdivisions. In addition, the site borders several homes that are along Pleasant Hill Drive. The closest commercial developments to the site are the general commercial areas along Brambleton Avenue. 6. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT bite Lavo~t A Concept Plan and a Concept Diagram have been submitted to show the proposed layout of the site. These plans, prepared by SFCS and dated January 25, 1999, portray the general layout of the proposed school, parking areas, and recreational areas. These plans also show one of the two possible access routes currently being discussed by the School Board. {See discussion of Traffic Circulation and Access below). The Concept Plan shows the general location of the major site facilities. This document should be evaluated in conjunction with the Concept Diagram which portrays general use areas. Approval of the SUP with these two plans, will allow the site designers to adjust final site development plans within the parameters shown on the Concept Diagram. 3 S. ~~ The proposed school is located in the central northwest portion of the ' property closest to the Canterbury Park (Canter Drive) subdivision. The high school will be a single structure with an envisioned square footage in the range of 155,000-180,000 square feet. Portions of the school closest to Mudlick Creek may be up to three stories, to take advantage of the existing and proposed topography of the site. Approximately three to four homes along Canter will be in close proximity to the school building, although the conceptual plan shows the mass of the building being directed away from Canter Drive. Approximately 550 faculty, student and visitor parking spaces are shown on the western side of the property near homes located along Holland Road and Luwana Drive. Other smaller parking lots are proposed to provide bus parking, service area parking, and parking associated with the various recreational areas on the Concept Plan. The Concept Plan also shows that the existing single family home will remain on the site. At this time the School Board has no plans for the use of this structure, and has not decided whether or not to remove the structure as part of the development of the site. If the home remains, it could possibly continue to be used as a residence, could serve as a location for school related office or instructional space, or be used as a location for small scale community meetings or events. Other private or non-school use of the building would not be permitted under the sites' R-1 zoning. ~radina,~~o~raphy and Veaetative Cover Significant grading of the property will be required to accommodate the school and large parking areas. Other grading will also be required to achieve proper stormwater management and to develop the multiple recreation areas and associated parking lots. Preliminary analysis shows that cut and fill of the site will be close to balanced, alleviating the need for significant additional truck traffic during construction. Grading of the site will result in a significant loss of the wooded areas. Preliminary engineering shows that grading to the property line is likely in the area of Lakeland Drive and along the upper portion of Canter Drive. The Concept Plan shows that screening will be planted in these areas to attempt to mitigate the impact of the use and grading on these two areas. The plan also shows a desire to preserve existing trees/wooded areas between the school and Canter Drive, and along Mudlick Creek in the areas around the proposed recreation areas. Grading of the property will remove the existing farm 4 S-1~ pond that is on the site. Although grading will likely impact some of these areas, the remaining trees will serve as a visual and sound buffer for the surrounding homes. The zoning ordinance requires that screening be provided between any outdoor activity or recreation area and any surrounding residential use. The high school is anticipated to generate an ADT of approximately 2000 vehicles per day. The majority of these vehicles will occur during two peak periods coinciding with the hours of the typical school day. Staff recognizes that other uses of the property for school evening events and community based recreation programs will also add to these traffic volumes. Staff estimates that the R-1 zoning of the property would allow in excess of 190 dwelling units on the property. This is a very conservative estimate assuming a density of not more that four units per acre, a ten percent public road allowance, and no residential construction occurring within the approximately 15 acres of floodplain on the property. This number of units would likely generate approximately 1900 vehicles per day. Staff would expect that multiple new roads would serve the property including road connections to streets such as Canter, Farmington, Lakeland, and Holland. In evaluating this sites suitability for a high school, multiple access options were considered by the applicant The site has access potential from many points including Pleasant Hill Drive, Farmington Drive, Grape Tree Lane, Holland Road, Canter Drive and Lakeland Drive. Factors such as traffic volumes and characteristics, surrounding land uses, the design and capacity of surrounding road systems, cost of road improvements, and topography were considered in the preparation of the conceptual plans. As a result of this analysis two possible access routes are being evaluated by the applicant. Each of these routes involves the extension of new public road access to the site .Under each alternative, Pleasant Hill Drive, off of Brambleton Avenue, will be the sole vehicle access to the site for all traffic including students, faculty, and visitors. The first option being considered, and shown on the submitted plans involves an upgrade to Pleasant Hill Drive and an extension of Arthur Thurman Road into the site. Arthur Thurman Road is a paper right-of-way that presently terminates several 5 several privately owned properties, either in whole or in part. The School Board is currently discussing with the intervening property owners the acquisition of the necessary land to allow Pleasant Hill to be improved, and allow Arthur Thurman to be extended to the site and developed to state standards. The second access option being explored also involves the upgrade and use of Pleasant Hill Drive. However, this option would extend Pleasant Hill straight into the property through a portion of the Bowman property. This option would alleviate the necessity of using Arthur Thurman Road, and would allow a straight extension to the site. As with the first option, the School Board is discussing the acquisition of the necessary property with the affected property. A traffic engineering study has been commissioned to determine the impact of the Pleasant Hill options on the surrounding street systems, and the specific improvements, if any, that will be necessary for Pleasant Hill Drive to be a safe, and efficient access to the site. Specific road improvements are likely to include (1) the construction of a right hand turn lane on to Pleasant Hill Drive from Brambleton Ave.; (2) construction of a median separated left hand turn lane from Brambleton to Pleasant Hill; (3) widening/construction of Pleasant Hill from Chippenham Drive (Kingston Ct.) to the site; (4) possible realignment of several Brambleton Ave commercial entrances with Pleasant Hill Drive, and (5) possible complete signalization of the Pleasant Hill Drive/Brambleton Ave. intersection. The Virginia Department of Transportation will have the final approval authority for any or all proposed road improvements, including the installation of a signal light at Brambleton and Pleasant Hill. The signal light will only be approved by VDOT if the volume and characteristics of the school's traffic is sufficient to meet VDOT's warrants for a light. The traffic engineering study is expected to be completed by the date of the Commission's public hearing. VDOT will thereafter evaluate the study and determine which improvements are required. The proposal for a single Pleasant Hill Drive access to Brambleton restricts high school traffic from the surrounding Canterbury Park, Nottingham Hills and Nichols Estates subdivisions, but does place considerable new traffic volumes near Kingston Court at the intersection of Chippenham Drive. Staff expects that during peak afternoon hours, residents of Pleasant Hill Drive and Kingston Court may be restricted from free-flow access to Brambleton via Pleasant Hill as a result of queued high school traffic exiting the site to Brambleton. If expected traffic volumes and characteristics do not warrant a signal light at this intersection, peak hour traffic will be further impeded resulting in significant delays at this intersection. 6 5-~~ If VDOT determines that a traffic light is not warranted at this intersection, staff believes that the School Board and their engineers should fully explore the provision of a second access point to the site so that peak hour traffic is diffused to different locations. A second access point would also require site plan changes to accommodate on site circulation needs. Two related traffic issues involve (1) construction traffic and (2) the potential for student parking in surrounding neighborhoods. Although utility construction may involve necessary work in the Canter Drive and Holland Road areas, staff believes that most/all of the construction traffic should access the site from Pleasant Hill Drive. Again, this puts an additional short-term impact on residents near Pleasant Hill Drive, but restricts truck, construction employee, and equipment traffic from other surrounding neighborhoods. The Commission should also recognize that the construction of the school on this site may result in some student parking in adjoining neighborhoods instead of in the provided on-site parking areas. This has occurred in neighborhoods surrounding another county high school. The topography of the school site, the number of parking spaces proposed, and the location of the school on the site in relation to surrounding streets may limit this potential. Amenity Multiple amenities are proposed or envisioned for the site. In addition to the five distinctive recreational areas that will be available for school or community use, the site is also a very important link in the Roanoke Valley Greenway System. Mudlick Creek was designated a major greenway artery in the Roanoke Valley Conceptual Greenway Plan adopted by the Board of Supervisors and included as a major component in the 1998 Community Plan. The proposed conceptual site design preserves the integrity of the Mudlick Creek area, with physical improvements limited to the proposed on-site access road and necessary grading for the recreation areas. A publicly constructed greenway along Mudlick Creek would not affect the development plan and would be a very valuable community asset. Another possible greenway link is the existing Woods End driveway from Farmington Drive. Although this driveway will not be open to vehicle traffic after the construction of the school, it could serve as a useful pedestrian link between the Farmington Drive neighborhoods and the recreational areas proposed as part of the school site. 7 S-II The School Board has indicated an intent to only provide parking lot, roadway, and security lighting on the site. It is not the intent of the School Board to light any of the proposed recreational areas, with the exception of the tennis courts. Any lighting installed on the site will need to conform to Roanoke County zoning standards for light placement and intensity and may not exceed .5 foot candles at any property line. Utilities The Roanoke County Utility Department has advised that public water and sewer are available in sufficient capacity to serve the site. Public water is available from several areas. Public sewer traverses the site along Mudlick Creek. Other public utility providers such as AEP, Cox Cable, Bell Atlantic, and Roanoke Gas have advised the applicant that their services are located in the surrounding areas and can be extended to the site. Roanoke County Fire and Rescue has advised that the proposed use of this property as a public school will not negatively impact their ability to continue to provide services at current levels. The concept plan for the site shows a proposed emergency vehicle access road off of the end of Holland Drive. This extension of Holland will be gated or otherwise designed to ensure that only emergency vehicles in emergency situations have access to the road. I~~ighborhood and Community Involvement During 1998 the School Board convened a citizens committee comprised of representatives of surrounding neighborhoods. A purpose of the committee was to keep the surrounding neighborhoods advised of progress on the project, and to solicit neighborhood feedback on design issues. Several newsletters have been sent to the surrounding neighborhoods, keeping residents apprised of design issues and the status of the project. 8 S~aJ On February 24, a community meeting was held at Cave Spring Junior High School to present the project to the community and solicit their comments and suggestions. Eleven-hundred property owners were invited; approximately 150 residents attended the meeting. The primary issue discussed at this meeting was access. Approximately 10-15 residents expressed concern that sole access to the site was proposed to be from Pleasant Hill Drive. Concern focused on the effect that the schools access will have on the ability of Kingston Court and Pleasant Hill residents to easily access their property during peak hours of high school traffic. Residents suggested that other/additional traffic options should be explored and that additional access routes to the site should be constructed and used. Other issued raised included the following: • Proximity of the recreational areas to the homes on Brentwood Court within Kingston Court. Particular concern was expressed over the conceptual location of the tennis courts. • School lighting plans and the potential effect of that lighting on surrounding property owners • Security issues related to after-hours unauthorized use of the property. • Noise pollution in the neighborhood resulting from school use of the property and community use of the recreational areas. • Drainage and stormwater management issues. There seemed to be a consensus that a regional stormwater detention pond on the site would be a good use of the Mudlick Creek Flood Plain. • Potential for student parking in surrounding neighborhoods. The Concept Plan shows the location of a small on-site stormwater management pond. This pond is required to detain on-site runoff from the building, parking lot and other non-pervious areas on the site. The pond would be designed to accommodate the expected flows and would discharge the stormwater in a manner that protects downstream property owners. A better option for the site and one that is being currently discussed by the County and School Board is to use the undeveloped portions of the site along 9 l~ Mudlick Creek for a regional stormwater detention facility as proposed in the Roanoke Valley Regional stormwater Management Plan. If constructed, the impoundment area would extend from the access road, west towards Canter Drive. The access road would serve as the "dam" for the pond, and thus the construction of the regional pond would have a low marginal cost if incorporated into the school construction process. During peak storm events, the impoundment would fill with water, and would help to reduce downstream flooding. During most periods, no impoundment would occur and the stream would be contained within its existing channel. The designated multi-purpose field would likely not be available for use during these peak events. C. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Many elements of this proposal conform to the goals, objectives and policies contained in the Community Plan. The construction of a new south county high school was a recommendation contained within the 1997 Comprehensive Facilities Study of the Roanoke County School System. The recommendations of this study were incorporated into the 1998 Roanoke County Community Plan. The Roanoke Valley Regional stormwater Management Plan has been incorporated by reference into the Community Plan. This study recommends that a portion of this site, be used as a regional stormwater management facility to help alleviate downstream flooding issues. Mudlick Creek has been designated as a future vital greenway link in the Conceptual Greenway Plan and the Community Plan. The future land use maps contained in the Community Plan designate this area as Neighborhood Conservation. The plan states that institutional uses are a recommended land use in neighborhood conservation areas, and that such uses, (parks, schools, libraries and churches) can play a vital role in enhancing a neighborhoods character. Recommended design guidelines for institutional uses include (1) locating such uses at the edges of neighborhoods of different densities, (2) screening and buffering incompatible uses, and (3) incorporation of greenways that connect the institutional uses to surrounding neighborhoods. 10 S-l l PART III STAFF CONCLUSIONS A. Conformance with Community Plan The submitted proposal conforms to the future land use guidelines contained in the Community Plan. Institutional uses are encouraged to locate in and near residential areas, provided the design of the proposed site takes into consideration neighborhood impact issues such as traffic, lighting, screening, noise etc. The proposed high school is a key recommendation of the school facility study, and the construction of the school will fulfill this plan recommendation. The incorporation of the regional stormwater management facility and the greenway link into the school's plan will insure that this school proposal further complies with two key recommendations of the 1998 Community Plan. B. Impact on Community The construction of a high school on this site will change the character of this area, and result in a significant change in the land use of this property. The existing zoning of this property would allow residential development in excess of 190 units, thus relative impacts of competing uses should be considered. The School Boards proposal to provide access to the site via an improved Pleasant Hill Drive and Brambleton Avenue intersection insures that school related bus, car and service traffic does affect other surrounding neighborhoods. The single access proposal will place an additional 2000 + VPD on Pleasant Hill and will during peak hours result in delays for residents who reside in the Kingston Court and Pleasant Hill areas. The installation of a signal at Brambleton will greatly reduce expected peak hour vehicle queues and will ease and improve the safety of access to Brambleton during all peak and non-peak times. Site development will result in a visual impact for surrounding property owners. Property owners on Canter will be closest to the school building, with Nottingham Hills residents being closest to the proposed parking areas. All surrounding owners will likely experience noise impacts from the school, parking and recreational areas, however, the proposed site design and screening will address noise consideration to the extent feasible. Noise and "people activity" is likely to be greatest in the Kingston Court and Pleasant Hill area due to the 11 ~. proposed traffic access and location of the recreational facilities. --~'' The construction of the various recreation areas and the possible construction of a regional stormwater detention facility, and a public greenway will add very valuable public facilities in the southwest county area. Multiple property owners will benefit from reduced flooding events and many will enjoy the recreational opportunities created by the school construction C. Recommendations and Conditions The staff recommends that the special use permit for this project be approved. We believe that the following conditions should be added to the permit to help to insure the compatibility of the site with the surrounding community and the eventual construction of the various public facilities envisioned for the site. 1 The site will be developed in general conformance with the Concept Plan and Concept Diagram prepared by SFCS and dated 1 /25/99. Site facilities shown on the Concept Plan may be located and expanded within the general areas portrayed on the Concept Diagram. All proposed recreation areas shall be passive field areas with the exception of proposed track, baseball/softball field, and tennis courts. Parking may be provided for the recreation areas. The tennis courts may be relocated to any designated recreation area. 2. Vehicular access to the site shall be limited to either an extension of Pleasant Hill Drive or an extension of Arthur Thurman Road to the site. Holland Road may be extended to provide for emergency service vehicles only. A gate or other means shall be provided to ensure that non-emergency traffic does not access the site from this route. The existing private drive from Farmington Drive serving the single family home the property shall be closed to vehicular traffic, but may be used for pedestrian access to the recreation areas. 3. An area of the site as generally shown on a conceptual plan entitled Mudlick Regional stormwater Management Facility and dated March 2, 1999 shall be reserved and permanently set aside by easement for the possible development of a regional stormwater detention facility. Only passive recreational facilities, the shown access road, and a greenway shall be allowed within this general area. 12 "~ x 4. A minimum 30 foot wide area along the entire length of Mudlick Creek from Canter Drive to Farmington Drive shall be set aside and reserved by easement or other suitable instrument for a possible future greenway on the property. The exact location of this greenway area will be determined at site plan review and approval. 5. If a regional stormwater detention facility is constructed on this property, construction of the facility shall incorporate the installation of a paved 10 foot wide greenway trail along the entire length of the above referenced greenway easement area. 6. Final site plans for the property shall show all required screening and buffering areas as required by the Roanoke County zoning ordinance. 7. All site lighting proposed for the property shall comply with the Roanoke County zoning ordinance and shall not exceed .5 foot candles at adjoining property lines. 13 courvT~ o~ ~o~~ox~ DEPT. OF PLANNIPVG A1~D ZONl~1G 520ll Bernard fir. P.O. tox 2°8GQ Roanoke, VA 240 i 8 (5~C' 772-2068 FAX (5401 %j2-2108 Far staff use only date recaivea ~,,± receivedjy: application fes: ~ PCiBZ? dace; ~ ,r:; . I placards issu=_d: ~ oOS data: ~, tease ~lumoer: ~ ^ ,~ i :. .:..~.,.:.,...:: .~ .:....:::::::'::..;'.`..:°.`:~i?`.:`:.:'.` ::;::~':::::::::!:.::`~`':.!::::::::~.'~:' .':i~ is ; :`., ... ;... . Check type of application filed (check ail that apply): 0 RE77~JINC; ,~ ~r~~i,lAl I Ic: (-lv:~ ~ i n w~~ ?.pplicant`s name: ,~~':~r ~~~ ~'~~>,,- M ~ ~~e ~~-:~~= ^ Phone:.~~.~ ;~'~fp=. Address: ~ ~' .: f Zio Code: J? Owner's name: '~~,, ~ ~. _~,~; _,~;.~ _ _~ , ,-,~~T~,.,_ Phone: dress: ~. ,~~',"~ .:~ ;~d•~,~ ~ - r'.;s e° ~ ~, ? ~;; p Zi Code: K , ~~ y Location of ro ert r ~ P P Y ~.a~~ z ~ !; ~ ~ ., ~&'.~f-~a.> Tax Map Number: ~~,.~.:~ ~_~i~` ° ~ ` ~ ~ j ,~ ~~-r , ~°- ' ~ ~ ~, .:. t Magisterial district: ~,//,;~~~~,:~,,, ~~f ~~~!, Community Planning Area: ~''~';~,,`,~... ; " ~~, I1~ Size of parce! (sj: Existing Zoning: f ~. ,;;~ acres Existing Land Use: ~~,~, y t {, ;':! i~i"''is.:~'~'~'~:'0i'~'''i:''~i'~0".,:.;.~'.'iE~~~'~'~:':':::::: i'i:i':::i:ii:i::iii:iiii!iiiii: i:i:iii:::i:~i i:ii:i'i'ias .. .--~;;:, Prcposed Zoning: ~ ~r srat,° us= Gnly Proposed Land Usa ,~ ,~ ~ ~ ~~"~~ -• ~ EE use ~ ype: ...~ , . _~. <W - . , ova . , _ _ -_ k a I:. Does the parce( meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES ~_ NO IF NO, A VA„IA.NCE iS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parce! meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YE , ^JO IF NO, A VARIANCE 1S REQUIRED F!P,ST. if rezoning request, are conditions being preffere-~ with this request? ~(ES NO '::?:~ t!~;: :;:;, c;:: iii;i i;'.:''I''lir~ ` ~:'; ~'~' ~ ~ ~~: ~~: ~ ~~~;';(E``, ~~~ •~~,''~i `~ i':[??`:. `'~'~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ '~:'iii;: Vii: s 'i ~='~' ~ ~ ! ~'i_~' ~ ~! ` ~'~~'' ~[ ~~ ~'' Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in ordar to: !s the application complete? Please check it enclosed. APPLICA.TIGN MILL NOT BE ACCE,°TED IF A.~VY OF THESE 1TE~1S AR,E MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. pis v Rrs v ws v Consultation 8 1i2" x 1' " concept plan A.po!ication fee App(icaticn ,;,v~; Metes and bounds description s`-<"<~ Proffers, if applicable Justit'ication >~~~ Water and Bawer application, Adjoining property owners l hereby c~~rr'fy that / am either t,`:e owner of the property or the owner's agent or con, tract purchaser and am acting with the know/eog and conse,~t of the o jw~er. '~~ e:~~;r',f ~ ;~:~ Qwner's Si na ur ,/ ~ ~ ~ '' ~ ' For S:arY Use Only: Case ~lurnoer ::?~~: : ',i: ~. .: ~A .: ~..,:;;.,,:::E[:;.::i;:;;:;:iii:i::i,;;,;;;,;,,,;;y;;~':p:,;l:;;;iy;`::;;l;iii.i?;:iip:E;:?;:;::i~:;:,;::::.:::...:.:.. _.;.....,,:i..;::;:;:..::: ~..........:.:::6; •;::. ,,,, .... The Planning Commission V~ill study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general `Ne!fare. Please ans'fver the foife~r,ing questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additienai space if necessary, P;eaS2 eXpia(n `10w the regUeSt tUrtilers the pUrpGScS Gi the Zoning Ordinance (seCtlGn ;,0-3) aS `J`Jeil as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. ~' Please explain, how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. :. ~' - i I Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properies, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, inc`uding water/se'Ner, roads, schools, parksirecreation, and fireirescue. - I ArcP iterture ~nginearing Planning Interiors -,. -~. ~ , ~~ ,,~s ~. '~ SherQrtL ~=ranklin Crawford Shaffner Inc. January 29, 1999 Board of Supervisors and Planning Commission of Roanoke County Attn: Mr. Terrance Harrington, AICP Director of Planning and Zoning P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 Re: The Proposed South County High School On Behalf of the Roanoke County School Board and Roanoke County Schools Application for a Special Use Permit Dear Members of the Board and Planning Commission: On behalf of the Roanoke County Schools and the Roanoke County School Board, we respectfully request that you accept this application fora "Special Use Permit". We have included in this submission a preliminary site development plan showing the proposed zones of development within which we will be locating a new high school and its associated support functions, such as athletic facilities and parking. We have also included a concept or schematic site plan that delineates our initial efforts at locating the school building, parking, athletic fields, and site access. With the assistance and encouragement of Roanoke County Schools, we have worked to include the community in the design and development process for this new school. To date, we have had several meetings with community groups and have arranged for monthly meetings with a committee of representatives from each of the adjacent neighborhoods. This committee has agreed to assemble a newsletter for distribution to the residents of the neighborhoods adjacent to the site containing a summary of issues discussed, decisions made, and pending developments related to the proposed high school. They have also agreed to solicit questions and concerns from the residents of the respective neighborhoods for discussion and resolution at the planned monthly meetings. S-!i 305 South Jefferson Street Roanoi<e, Virginia 24011-2003 540-344-664 F.qX 540-343-0925 etvlaii sfcs@sres.com We have met with VDOT on several occasions to discuss their concerns and requirements and to ensure that a high lave! of communication and cooperation is maintained throughout the entire development and design process for the proposed high school. A traffic study is currently being conducted along with the preliminary design of roadway improvements to ensure that VDOT will have accurate and comprehensive information for evaluation. The traffic study will also be used to ascertain the need and propriety of providing a traffic signal at the intersection Rt. 221and Pleasant Hiil Dr. The access route to the proposed high school site as shown on the conceptual or schematic site plan included in this submittal reflects the most current thinking on the matter. As shown, it assumes- that public road will continue from Rt. 221 up to proposed high school site. There are several residents that are likely to be affect by the roadway improvements that will be required by VDOT. The Roanoke County School Board has retained counsel to work through these impact issues with the affected residents, but a final solution has not yet been completed. It is expected that issues related to access route as shown on the conceptual or schematic plan will be resolved in the near future. We have contacted and met with all ofi the appropriate utility providers and determined that ail utilities are available within close proximity to the high school site. It is envisioned that the utilities will be extended to the high school site through existing easements. Similarly, an emergency entrance {possibly gated) from Holland Road will also be provided via an exiting easement. 1n the discussions with the residents of the adjacent neighborhoods and other community groups, we have indicated that we are interested in designing this project in a manner that will be sensitive to their concerns related to property values, views, noise, lighting, etc. Specifically, the School Board has stated that lighted athletic fields will not be provided on this site. Further, they stated that a lighted stadium will not be provided on the proposed high school site. Lighting will be restricted to the security lighting for the buildings and associated facilities, roadways, and parking lots. In all cases, the lighting provided on site will comply with the County ordinances. The conceptual or schematic site plan reflects our best efforts at preserving the natural wooded areas along the property line adjacent to the residential neighborhoods. In general, we have attempted to keep grading efforts as far as practical from the property lines; however, there are one or two areas where the grading is likely to extend to the property line. We will be providing the required ~~ screen planting in these areas, and possibly other areas where it is not required, in an effort to lessen the impact on the adjacent property owners. The School Board has indicated to the adjacent property owners that an effort will be made on the high school property to address long standing issues related to stormwater and flooding. Further, there has been preliminary discussion with Roanoke County regarding the incorporation of a larger stormwater management facility on the high school site that could function as a regional facility. These discussions; however, are very preliminary and the outcome is not conclusive at this time. We will continue to involve the community in the design and development efforts for this site and the proposed high school. We are also committed to continuing to foster a cooperative and productive relationship with ail involved, especially the adjacent neighborhoods. If you have any questions or require additional information to facilitate your review, please do not hesitate to contact us directly. Respectfully submitted, Roanoke County School Board Roanoke County Schools SACS, Inc. Engineering Concepts, Inc. Cc: Mr. Martin Robison Mr. Manjit Toor Mr. Dale Leidich Dr. Deanna Gordon Mr. John Schmidt Mr. Jack Ellinwood ~arauary ~9, 1999 ~~_ ~~ Sits ®evel®p~e~t N~rr~tive ~e ~~uth ~~ulr~ty ~3agh ~~h®®~ C~ ~c~ds ~r~d ~r~t~+~ducti®n Sherertz Franklin Crawford Shaffner Inc. (SECS) was contracted by Roanoke County Schools to provide architectural -engineering analysis and site evaluation of potential sites for the location of a new senior high school to serve south Roanoke County. Engineering Concepts, Inc. (ECI) was commissioned by SECS to assist them in analyzing site design feasibility. As a result of the site analysis phase the Woods End site was selected by the School Board as the best location for the development of the south county high school. Their site selection decision was made based on the consultant teams presentation of comprehensive feasibility and probable cost data of all considered locations. The following report will discuss the Woods End site characteristics, property information, utilit`j disposition, and development potential. '~®z~ds Er~d Site The Woods End site a largely undeveloped tract of land located west of Brambleton Avenue (Route 221) and Pleasant Hill Drive, and south of Farmington Drive. The site is bounded on all sides by existing single-family residential developments: Nottingham Hills on the north, Kingston Court on the east, Nichols Estates on the south, and Canterbury Park on the south and west. The initial site is comprised of three parcels of land totaling approximately 69.5 acres, having frontage on Farmington Drive, which is presently used as a residence/rental property. The main dwelling and ancillary buildings are accessed by means of a paved driveway running along the eastern boundary line, with an entrance onto Farmington Drive. The three individual parcels are currently under the ownership of Woods End, L.C. and are adequate in area to support the proposed building program for the School. Engineering Consultant Services, Ltd. (ECS) has performed a subsurface investigation of the proposed school site, a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA), and a wetland assessment. Per their findings, all soil borings were advanced to scheduled depth except for three borings, B-8, B-11 and B-15, which encountered weathered shale at depths of 19 feet, 9 feet and 30 feet respectively. Auger refusal occurred in these borings at 22, 16.5 and, 32 feet respectively. Proposed excavation in the vicinity of borings B-8, B-11 and B-15 are not expected to encounter rock. Per the ECS report, if weathered rock is encountered during grading operations, we do not anticipate that blasting wil! be required to facilitate its removal; however, isolated seam locations may require blasting in areas of the deepest excavation locations. The indications from this investigation are that the grading scheme as proposed is feasible and that the excavated material will be satisfactory for use in constructed fills and general site development. .„ An area of uncontrolled fill was found in the vicinit`~ of boring 13-3 in the northwest portion of the site. The fill section is limited and there are no structures proposed in this area. This fill • material should support site and roadway improvements with only slight modifieation. Some of the soils encountered on the site are moisture sensitive and may present some difficulty during grading operations due to the natural moisture content of the soil or exposure to rainfall and runoff when excavated. Final design grades and construction operations will be planned to preclude excessive or long-term exposure of areas of moisture-sensitive soils. The design of sediment control measures for the final site grading plan will attempt to intercept all overland rainfall runoff up-gradient from areas of excavation and direct surface flow to stabilized discharge locations. A preliminary earthwork tabulation based on the concept grading plan yields a cut volume of approximately 412,000 cubic yards and a raw (unadjusted for compaction) fill volume of approximately 377,000 cubic yards. Adjusting for compaction, we expect that the proposed grades can be adjusted to reach a balanced grading condition, probably in the range of 425,000 cubic yards of cut. The site is partially wooded, with the majority of tree cover occurring in the western portion of the property and along the stream valley of Mudlick Creek. The remainder of the site is open, lying in field or meadow condition. The main topographical feature of the site is Mudlick Creek and the associated stream valley that runs southwest to northeast through the entire site. Approximately three fifths of the site lies on the western side of Mudlick, and is t`jpified by gentle to roiling terrain, with elevations falling 130 feet from the western boundary to the creek. On the east side, ele~rations fail approximately 50 feet from the present Pleasant Hill Drive to the creek. There is an existing pond, approximately t*~vo acres in size, to the west of the residence on the main tract. Mudlick Creek passes below and immediately to the west of this pond. There is a 100-year flood plain associated with Mudlick Creek that has been mapped as shown on Panel 61 of 90, Map Number 511610061-D, of the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate map for Roanoke County, dated October 15, 1993. The approximate limits or" this flood plain have been show on the proposed site plan by scaling measurement from the FEMA map. ECS has confirmed the presence of jurisdictional waters of the U.S. on the property and are identified as Mudlick Creek and its tributary near the southern boundary. The delineation of possible wetlands was reviewed in the field by the Army Corps of Engineers' (COE) office in Christiansburg and were classified as non-jurisdictional (no wetlands). Included in the delineation was the existing surface pond that, based on the COE determination, may be drained and filled to accommodate possible recreation fields. The proposed utility extensions and the construction of the access roadway across Mudlick Creek will require permitting from the Corps of Engineers. A general nation wide permit will be obtained to allow these crossings to occur. ECS, Inc. has also performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of the subject property. Per their report, the site would generally be considered developable with no major impediments to construction. ON-S1TE IMPROVEMENTS ~-~~ The required improvements will consist of the necessary site preparation operations including, grading, road/parking construction, recreational area construction, sediment control measure installation, utility construction and storm drainage -storm water management construction. Additional items of on-site construction will include a monitoring manhole where the gravity sewer connects to the existing trunk sewer along Mudlick Creek and a multiple-celled box culvert or bridge to accommodate the access roadway across Mudlick Creek. The creek crossing will be designed to accommodate the 140-year flood without over topping the access road. A flood impact study will be submitted with the final design documents verifying the 100-year criteria. OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS The ofF-site improvements required at this site are primarily transportation and utility-related issues that will be addressed in order to provide the basic infrastructure to support the physical operation of the facilities and effect a safe and efficient use of the site by staff, students, and the general public. At Woods End, the off-site issues that were investigated by the consultant team were transportation and utility extension issues. Transportation Issues The major concern with transportation issues at the Woods End site is adequate site access. The existing main site parts! has a frontage entrance onto Farmington Drive, located approximately 1300 feet west of the intersection of Cave Spring Lane and Old Cave Spring Road. As they exist, Farmington Drive and Cave Spring Lane currently have narrow section roadways with relatively severe horizontal and vertical curve alignments. The existing entrance onto Farmington, as well as the intersection of Cave Spring Lane and Old Cave Spring Road are within the areas of 100-year flooding as shown on the above-mentioned FEMA flood map. Buses and vehicular traffic exiting the site at Farmington would have to travel out to the Old Cave Spring Road intersection, which is not signalized, and then travel either towards the signalized intersection at Brambleton Avenue and Old Cave Spring Road, or north on Old Cave Spring Road, then west on McVitty to the signal at Route 419. The majority of both of those routes are still within the 100-year flood plain boundary. In addition, Roanoke County has placed Old Cave Spring Road on the Six-Year Road Improvement Plan due to the high volume of existing traffic. We believe this reinforces the need to serve this site from an alternate location. Access to the other improved roadways associated with the neighboring subdivisions would only increase traffic on the lightly travelled residential streets and would provide a lengthy circuitous route back to any major thoroughfares. The access option proposed as shown on the concept plan is to enter the site by way of an extension of Pleasant Hill Drive into the property from the east. This will require reconstructing Pleasant Hill Drive beyond its intersection with Chippenham Drive to an adequate width to accommodate school traffic. The improvements to Pleasant Hill Drive will terminate at the intersection of Arthur Thurman Road (Paper Street). Arthur Thurman Road will be constructed to meet VDOT standards and extended to the school site property. An access drive will continue across Mudlick Creek and enter the school site proper. As discussed in the On-Site improvement section above, the crossing of Mudlick Creek will require a multi- , celled box culvert or precast-sectioned bridge to accommodate the roadway. The existing Pleasant Hill Drive intersects with Brambleton Avenue at a point approximately 900 feet southwest of the intersection of Brambleton and the end of Colonial Avenue/Old Cave Spring Road. At this location, Pleasant Hill has three trave! lanes: one lane westbound towards the site and two lanes (a right-turn and left-turn lane) eastbound towards Brambleton. Moving west from the intersection, the three-lane section roughly ends at the intersection with Chippenham Drive and then narrows back to t~nro travel lanes. At the top of the hill, Pleasant Hill Drive has a 90-degree bend to the south and continues on to its terminus at the A.M.E. Church site. At the Pleasant Hiil Drive intersection with Route 221, Brambleton Avenue has four trave! lanes (two each northbound and southbound) and a striped center turn lane. Directly east of the intersection of Pleasant Hill and Brambleton are two commercial driveway entrances. The entrance into the Most/y Sofas commercial site is immediately north of the alignment of Pleasant Hill, and one of the two entrances into St. John Lutheran Church is immediately south of the alignment of Pleasant Hiil. Based on preliminary meetings with VDOT representatives and supporting design data the consultant team will pursue the necessary transportation improvements required at this site as follows: 1. Construct right-turn lane onto Pleasant Hill Drive from westbound Brambleton Avenue 2. Reconstruct center-turn lane into median separated ler~-turn lane onto Pleasant Hill Drive from eastbound Brambleton Avenue 3. Extend the two lane section of Pleasant Hill Drive from Chippenham Drive into the school site (30 feet maximum width) 4. Construct new intersection at 90-degree bend location on Pleasant Hill Drive. 5. Construct Arthur Thurman Road (Paper Street) to VDOT standards (30 feet width) 6. Realign existing entrances to St. John's Lutheran Church and Mostly Sofas into joint entrance aligned with Pleasant Hill Drive 7. Reconstruct center-turn lane into median separated left-turn lane onto church/commercial entrance from westbound Brambleton Avenue; extend median toward intersection at Colonial Avenue accommodating required turn lanes and tapers 8. Provide complete signalization of intersection if Traffic Signal Warrant and Traffic Impact studies indicate that they are needed and are approved by VDOT. An additional on-site road connection is proposed to provide an alternate access to the site for emergency vehicles. This connection will be achieved by extending a roadway to the current terminus of Holland Drive at the northern boundary of the site. As proposed, this emergency access crosses an existing parcel of land within an existing 30-foot road easement. Utility Issues Contacts were made with all of the public utility providers to determine the existing services available in the vicinity of the sites. Where service was not available adjacent to the properties, the providers were asked to estimate the extent of work necessary and associated fr. Z costs to extend service to the school. The following is a brief summary of each service contacted. Public Water and Sewer - ECI contacted Sob Fronk with the Roanoke County Utility Department to discuss the site. Public water is available at several locations along the perimeter of the property. There are existing 6" and 8" diameter sines in Pleasant Hill Drive, 4"and 8" diameter lines in Farmington Drive, and a i0" diameter line in Canter Lane that is at the extreme southwest corner of the site. The line in Canter Lane is the nearest location to the proposed school building location. According to Mr. Fronk, fire hydrant flow tests on hydrants in Canter Lane reveal that the available fire flow at testing time was approximately 1360 gallons per minute (GPM) with a residual pressure of 66 PSI. Residual pressure above 50 psi are usually sufficient to support sprinkler systems without the aid of booster pumps in the buildings; however, the point of the service connection, the size and length of the service main, and the elevation of the school building will determine the final available pressure at the fire service iocation. Based on the proposed finished floor elevations as shown on the concept plan, pressures should be sufficient to provide sprinkler service. Fire flow and pressures will be analyzed further as site design proceeds. Gravity sewer service can be accommodated on-site by connection to the existing 8" trunk sewer which runs along Mudlick Creek. All points of the site will be sereied by gravity sewer. Mr. Fronk indicated that the existing line should have sufficient capacity to serve the school Site. Electric Service-Barbara Carer with AFP was contactedf concerning service availabilitt,~ to this site. Three-phase power is available aiong Brambleton Avenue and Old Cave Spring Road. Single-phase underground senaice is available at Canter Drive. Ms. Carter is working on costing optional routes to extend service to the site. tine suggestion is to upgrade the single- phase service aiong Canter Drive to three-phase service and extend the new service underground to the school site. This option will result in the shortest run to the building. ECI would anticipate that the revenue credit based on the proposed service level would allow AEP to provide service at little or no cost to the school. Natural Gas Service-Don Jones with Roanoke Gas Company was contacted for information on availability of natural gas service to this site. Existing gas lines are found in Canter Drive at Roselawn, Farmington Drive at Holland Drive, and Pleasant Hill Drive. The largest line available for service is the 4" diameter main in Farmington Drive at Holland Drive. We would propose that an extension be made along Holland Drive and the proposed emergency access road into the site. As with the other sites, we anticipate little or no costs associated with the extension of gas service to the site. Telephone/telecommunications-bell Atlantic has indicated that fiber optic service is available along Brambleton Avenue and would be extended into the site aiong the proposed access roadway from Pleasant Hill Drive. As with the other sites, we would expect no additional costs associated with provision of service to the school. Cable-Cox Cable has indicated that service is available at numerous points aiong the perimeter of the site and that they can provide service connections at any point convenient to the site design. ,~. CONCEPT PLAN The attached concept plan depicts a preliminary layout of proposed program elements necessary to support the proposed South County High School. This concept identifies specific requirements of development as dictated by Roanoke County ordinance. These requirements include screening, buffering, setbacks, parking access and storm water management. This concept is preliminary in nature and is subject to improvement and refinement as the design process continues. The enclosed conceptual diagram indicates general program development areas and access points. Site development permitting will be subject to the revie~av an approval of Roanoke County and the Virginia Department of Transportation. Transportation impact studies, traffic signal warrant studies and road improvement plans are currently being developed for submission to the plan approving authorities. The following are genera( notes and a site tabulation that correspond to the enclosed concept plan. GENERAL NOTES: 1. THE PROPERTY SHOWN HEREON IS IDENTiFiED AS TAX PARCEL #76.0-6-16, 86.08-4- 33 AND 86.07-1-1 WITHIN THE L4ND RECORDS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA. 2. ALL PROPOSED HIGH SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REGULATIONS OF THE R-1 AND R-3 ZONING DISTRICT (SPECIAL EXCEPTION) AND WILL BE SUBJEt::I" TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY ROANOKE COUNTY PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS, 3. ALL PRIVATE ROADS, PARKING, OPEN OR GREEN SPACE AND STORM WATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE OWNER. ~. FINAL LANDSCAPING SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE AS A MINIMUM. 5. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO ROANOKE COUNTY AND VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 6. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT CALCULATIONS VERIFYING THE PRELIMINARY FACILITIES SHOWN WILL ACCOMPANY THE FINAL PLANS. 7. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANS, NARRATIVE, AND CALCULATIONS WILL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE FINAL PLANS. DESIGN SHALL CONFOOM TO STATE AND ROANOKE COUNTY REQUIREMENTS. 8. THE PROPOSED GRADES SHOWN HEREON DEPICT GENERAL SITE GRADES. FINAL PLANS SHALL INCORPORATE DETAILED SITE GRADING. BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY BALZER AND ASSOCIATES DATED NOVEMBER 6, 1998. 9. ENTRANCE CONFIGURATIONS, ACCESS ROUTES AND TRIP GENERATION CALCULATIONS ARE SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY VDOT PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF FINAL PERMITS. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT STUDY WILL BE INCLUDED IN SUBMISSION DOCUMENTS TO THE VIRGINIA. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. ZONING TABULATION AREA OF DEVELOPMENT 69.618 ACRES (TOTAL ACREAGE ALL PARCELS) CURRENT ZONING TAX PARCELS # 76.20-6-16 & 86.07-1-1 ZONED R-1 TAX PARCEL # 86.08-4-33 ZONED R-3 PROPOSED ZONING R-1 AND R-3 WITH SPECIAL EXCEPTION (SECONDARY SCHOOL) CURRENT USE RESIDENTIAL PROPOSED USE SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL NOTE: THERE WILL BE NO BUILDINGS CONSTRUCTED WITHIN R-3 DISTRICT (TAX PARCEL # 86.08-4-33) MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS R-1 MINIMUM LOT AREA PLOTTED LOT AREA MINIMUM FRONTAGE PLATTED FRONTAGE 7,200 S.F. 61.542 ACRES (2,680,770 SF) 60 FT, 460 F7. R-3 7,200 S.F. 8.076 ACRES (351,790 SF) 60 FT. NONE. ACCESS VIA 30' PRIVATE RIGHT-OF-WAY. PARCEL MEETS MINIMUM FRONTAGE AND AREA REQUIREMENTS. YARDS MINIMUM SETBACK REQ. 30 FT. MINIMUM REAR YARD 10 FT. MINIMUM SIDE YARD 25 FT. ALL YARD REQUIREMENTS MET THIS SITE. MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF STRUCTURES PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES ACCESSORY STRUCTURES MAXIMUM COVERAGES 45 FT. 15 FT. 30 FT. 10 FT. 25 FT. 45 FT. 15 FT. PRIMARY BUILDINGS 30% TOTAL LOT AREA 35% TOTAL LOT AREA ACCESSORY BUILDINGS LOT COVERAGc ,u. 10% TOTAL LOT AREA 7% TOTAL LOT AREA , ' , 50% TOTAL LOT AREA 60% TOTAL LOT AREA SCREENING & BUFFERING -SHALL MEET OR EXCEED THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE. WHERE ANY OUTDOOR ACTIVITY AREA, BALL FIELD OR COURT, OR STADIUM ADJOINS A RESIDENTIAL USE TYPE, ONE ROW OF SMALL EVERGREEN TREES SHALL BE LANDSCAPED ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE ADJOINING THE RESIDENTIAL USE TYPE. WHERE NIGHTTIME LIGHTING OF SUCH AREAS IS PROPOSED LARGE EVERGREEN TREES SHALL BE REQUIRED. LANDSCAPING -SHALL MEET OR EXCEED THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ROANGKE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE. SIGNS -SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE. LIGHTING -EXTERIOR LIGHTING WHEN PROPOSED SHALL BE DESIGNED, LOCATED AND ARRANGED SO THAT AS NOT TO DIRECT GLARE ON ADJOINING STREETS OR PROPERTIES. THE LIGHTING ITENSITY AT ADJOINING RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES SHALL NOT EXCEED 0.5 FOOT CANDLES. UTILITIES - THI5 SITE WILL BE SERVED BY PUBLIC SEWER AND WATER. PARKING REOUIRED: EMPLOYEE - 1 SPACE/EMPLOYEE (MAJOR SHIFT] 100 EMPLOYEES = 100 SPACES STUDENT - i SPACE/ 4 STUDENTS IN 11TH AND 12TH GRADE 1 SPACE/4 STUDENTS x 450 STUDENTS (ESTIMATED) = 113 SPACES LOADING SPACES - 1 SPACE/100,000 S.F. OF BUILDING AREA X175,000 S.F. BUILDING (CONCEPTUAL) 2 LOADING SPACES REQUIRED, PROVIDED: EMPLOYEE/VISITOR - 160 SPACES STUDENT - 414 SPACE5 RECREATIONAL AREA - 45 SPACES SUBTOTAL = 619 SPACES HANDICAPPED = 2% x SUBTOTAL = 13 SPACES TOTAL = 632 SPACES 2 LOADING SPACES 17 BUS SPACES '- l .~~~a~ r~~ ~~ . Sherert FranMin CI2Hrt0lG Shartner lnc. FHU14 3C5 zW M ~xflxsan iveet '~SNC Reanwa. KrtyNa 2461 t-ifl00 ~~ ~~ ~ _ .~_ - ~ .-~"~ j'""' ~ ~- _ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ BRAMBLETON AVE. 0 140' • -~ ,,~ ~ `. ~~ 1 ~ =fY ` / ~~ 1!1[bdlt flll (t I v -~ < < ~ ~tf 1 tt Scrvi ~ G \ 3 r11~ ~ `'~~~ i~~~' G" yes ~~... ~~~~ ~ ~~} ~: r~:1~ i.~g~ ~ l 11 6 `I' ~ , -~. s ~chulil~,.~_ ~ C ~ 9 ~~ r - _i= ~, ~ _ ~ i 1 ,~ il' E ~ ~=1 TNb K,r~ 7 TI'10 l { ' ,a / it ~ I ~~ ~ _ ,' F +-ju ~ruY ~ err- I 1 TorvY_.~~ ~' ~~ ~..~ ~ ~~~ ~ ? / z ,~ , ~"~ 1 si1~ ~„-L~ ~ I ~ t~ ~ --1 _ - -_ ~ fI r ~t=n~E+iBNT 1 - o r - ~ /T ~`=r W4 ,~ ~~.(litl-+r-il riTCi~ ~ .tr- ~ ~~.~ t ~~~. ~i ~~ ~ r ~ r~ ~\ Softbnlf - i v; ~, ~ / ~ or ~ ~f .Irl t~. ~ '''~ C `~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~I ~`-P~ ~11 \ ~_-''_ }-, ~- mar`. -~ _--'~` ~~'~ tili\cur _ ~ ~ ~~A nn~ _~ ~r - T ~ r ~ 'l C ti ~ T~ _ ~ _ _ .~ i J.- z ~, jy~ciscElt~ _ i _ I I 1 f I , I I PI sale . ~ ~• c-- ~~ ~, ~- - - J , i , ~ ~ i /'~ 1 GENERAL NOTES: / ( '._.I L THe vxo.exrv 4xowm nrunvrs mENmAEn n.E r.L%r,.acEl. ` ) ~ ~~ nE]abrE. nn aw..L;).wuwol.r.,wmrwrnfLAno rze~oxos uF ,/~~ \ ~ //~ ^~ 0.14w(xttl CUUNTY. vI1lGINIA / 1D 1 z {u paeroseu wcN SGHnoL oE.w.or.Mer, wILL nE 1N tI A¢owAncf wrnl n+e AecuuTgNS vP nle A~I Ann Aa zonwG 1 {a wsTRrc.-r INpELUI. ExLTmoN) Axo wlLL Re sva)ecr To n.~•lew - - //~--~ .\tq APPNO'L'AI. PY FOANO{:E NUNiI'P0.IUP TO TIE LSRL'nNLY t7F Iii _ \ ~.~ // •~ ].ALLPRIVATE ROADS. PARINtf., OPEN OA GREEN SPACLAHU /1/ /// \\\\ Y1(HIAI w•ATER MnNAUEMAIrt FnCILTE49H,LLL S2 HAmTA1NFD NY / II ~ V \\\ nIF ONmfR. Y ~\\ ~. ANAL LANDSCAPING SHALL EIEET Tl@ AEOUGIFAIEM1TS UP nNi 'G PDA r%II:E CCUNtt YG.VING (10.0[NANCE ASAMIMMUM. ~ ~~ ~ '~ f. nLl.Nw1l RIR'IION SfULLNN1CWAr TO RDNRI%E (Y)UhT'AHD `'F 1 r1 v1ALTllA DP.PARTFIENTDP Tq ANSMRTATNNr n'. WAAUSA.Vn IIA~ APECSAGTIONS. ~~_~~ _ ` 6.SEORM WATEM1LInNAGP.MFMGLCN.nilnNa \4AT'MO THE ~ ~ ._.) F Ij' f~xfiLNIWwNY PAl11.ITIF5 SIR)Wh w•ILL nR'UM1N'AHV'Gre PWAL ~ -_ _ ~ ~~~~ l...! ~ ~ ~_ ,~~ y ,~ ; P<.,NS ). LROSNYi ANOSEOIMRNT GUNiAOL PLANS NARMTIVE.AND CAMULAi10. WLLL tl63U1MIRTEU wnm l'NE FINAL PLANS. nESgNRNALL CONFINIHI TO STATE ANU NUANONF CIX:LTY ~ ~ ~~ ~/ REOUINNAIENI4 .- -_'i _PFcs~tYE.P SpaO n, n1E pxU149EUUMDe44HOwNHRAEON nFPICT GGN SIR. (/ ~--+.~ ' PLANS SNALL INCONPOW\TE UEI'NLFU SITY I ~ ` ~ , _// q` GMDNG.PPWN'UAaP.{ND TOIU(:MYNIL'SURVEY BV B:U1EN nNn t \` ~r'~ y ,144)[.lnTFS nATEn NOYEMI1FP n, lust ` ~ V \ ~ ~% Y//Ay/, `$'/' GviAANLY CONACUMAONS wCCC4SRWiES AHD TIUp ' j /~ GENEM?1pN CM.CLLAnONS wRE SUHRGTT00.E\'IFM'ANT ~ ~ / r'~`o nPPNOVnL vr%ftP0.)ON tt)nIf IYSUwNCL'UF ANAL rEIUUTS. ~ / ' MMMTSTWYAn'D T0.APRI05gNAL w'ANRAN(SI'Lllil' I~p, ~~ WI.Ltll RVCWD©ISrSU0.MIggN nOfTMENTS TO MF. vIRGMI.\ ~ ~~ nFPAATMPNT XTR.aN4m0.TAA[~~OHv. 4~ N°O A 8helartz F2ntain Crawiortl $hRlTnfr Inc. ~~ - ~.-. 2J V.t E ZZ\ ~RIA6 3o4 EwNJallenm 3h.xN - ~ . -._.~ -.~.._. 4 INC Pnvalu, JYgRNR:AO1i3000 ` '~..~~-- "' la, r{ 4 `-1 P~I,EYO .I R-:J ~ • iw IW L :J -_,."~J 1 i ~ ~ \.~ /( // ,: ~ '~ ~ E ~' ~C, , 1~ ~ v ^~/ ~ ~, `=_ a ~ ~ s; y A ~~ .r ~ '~ eo a F ~ ~~~ ~ ~ w ~ _ ~ t ~g ~\` ...~~jTTT ~7 y - Y`M ~J ~ ~3 ~ /Ft y b f ..~ ~ ~,,~_ ,~~_ // `~~ 1 / _ •ab .ADS ..., d ra up ~ 6~ ~"J i, ~ w _ B y • ~ r3 ~ L '' ~~p,~ ~~ N SR '1aa gar ,.~~.. ''++jj°°~~ P '~,. ~ '~ ~ 9 a u 4 q '~n ip icy s f ~ _i ~~ ~ ~ ° fa' h ..i.. ~ ._. I • i y Ls P / ~~~~~~~ e~~rlv~~ ~~~a~T~~~~ ~~ ~~© ~~,~ ~~:~.aa~ s~t~ s~~~.~~ u~~ ~~~i FROM THE MINUTES OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD MEETING IN REGULAR SESSION ON MARCH 11, 1999 IN THE BOARD ROOM OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE RESOLUTION PURSUANT TO TITLE 25, TITLE 33.1 AND SECTION 22.1-127 OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA, 1950 (AS AMENDED), AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF A CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND FROM RICHARD L. BRYANT AND A STRIP OF LAND FROM MABEL N. BOWMAN FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL PURPOSES AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN ACCESS ROAD TO A NEW HIGH SCHOOL BY EMINENT DOMAIN BE IT RESOLVED by the County School Board of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the construction of a new high school in South County has been approved by the County School Board for the citizens of Roanoke County in connection with the report of the Blue Ribbon Committee entitled "Comprehensive Facilities Study of Roanoke County Public Schools," March 17, 1997. 2. That an option to purchase has been obtained to acquire certain real estate consisting of 69.74 acres, located at 3535 Farmington Drive for public school purposes and the construction of a new high school and related facilities (the "Project"). 3. That the Project is necessary for the general health, safety and welfare of the public, and specifically will satisfy the needs and purposes of the public school system for the children in this portion of the County and the general public. 4. That it is necessary to acquire land for the purpose of building an access road to the Project. 5. That acquisition of land for the construction of an access road to the Project is necessary for public school purposes and the general health, safety and welfare of the public. 6. That the County School Board has chosen a route for such access road to the new school through an extension of Arthur Thurman Road. A copy of such proposed access road is shown on a map attached hereto and made a part of this resolution. 7. That construction of such access road requires the acquisition of land located at 4808 Pleasant Hill Drive, and owned by Richard L. Bryant, and a strip of property extending down Arthur Thurman Road located in the south back portion of 4811 Pleasant Hill Drive and owned by Mabel N. Bowman. 8. That in order to acquire such property, the County School Board does hereby invoke the rights, privileges and provisions as to the investing of powers in the County School Board under Section 25-46.1, et sec . ,and Section 33.1-89, et sec ., of the Code of Virginia, 1950, S- I I (as amended), all as made and provided by law. 9. That the Superintendent of Schools is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such action by herself or through her agents as may be necessary to accomplish these acquisitions through eminent domain or otherwise, including the obtaining of necessary surveys, borings and appraisals of the subject land, the making of a bona fide offer to Richard L. Bryant and Mabel N. Bowman to acquire the necessary land, to engage in such negotiations after the making of such offers as necessary and appropriate and to take such other actions as may be necessary to acquire such property. 10. That this resolution shall be effective on the date of its adoption. Adopted on motion of Mr. Leggette and duly seconded by Mr. Irvin and on the following vote: AYES: William A. Irvin, III, Thomas A. Leggette, Michael W. Stovall, Jerry L. Canada and Marion G. Roark NAYS: None ABSENT: None TESTE: ,~tL,,y,~i~~ [~C2!7,~ ,Brenda Chastain, Clerk ~_ r I AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 1999 ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO THE ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD TO CONSTRUCT A HIGH SCHOOL TO BE LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF BRAMBLETON AVENUE, WEST OF PLEASANT HILL DRIVE, SOUTH OF FARMINGTON DRIVE (TAX MAP NOS. 76.20-6-16, 86.07-1-1, 86.08-4- 33 ), WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, the Roanoke County School Board has filed a petition to construct a high school to be located on the west side of Brambleton Avenue, west of Pleasant Hill Drive, south of Farmington Drive (Tax Map Nos. 76.20-6-16, 86.07-1-1, 86.08-4-33) in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 2, 1999; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on February 23, 1999; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on March 23, 1999. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to the Roanoke County School Board to construct a high school to be located on the west side of Brambleton Avenue, west of Pleasant Hill Drive, south of Farmington Drive (Tax Map Nos. 76.20-6-16, 86.07-1-1, 86.08-4-33) in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1999 Community Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.2-2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved with the following conditions: (1) The site will be developed in general conformance with the Concept Plan and Concept Diagram prepared by SFCS and dated 1/25/99. Site facilities shown on the Concept Plan maybe located and expanded within the general areas portrayed on the Concept Diagram. All proposed recreation areas shall be passive field areas with the exception of proposed track, baseball/softball field, and tennis courts. Parking may be provided for the recreation areas. The tennis courts may be relocated to any designated recreation area. 1 M . s_ , r (2) Vehicular access to the site shall be limited to either an extension of Pleasant Hill Drive or an extension of Arthur Thurman Road to the site. Holland Road may be extended to provide for emergency service vehicles only. A gate or other means shall be provided to ensure that non-emergency traffic does not access the site from this route. The existing private drive from Farmington Drive serving the single family home on the property shall be closed to vehicular traffic, but may be used for pedestrian access to the recreation areas. (3) An area of the site as generally shown on a conceptual plan entitled Mudlick Regional Storm water Management Facility and dated March 2, 1999 shall be reserved and permanently set aside by easement for the possible development of a regional Storm water detention facility. Only passive recreational facilities, the shown access road, and a green way shall be allowed within this general area. (4) A minimum 30 foot wide area along the entire length of Mudlick Creek from Canter Drive to Farmington Drive shall be set aside and reserved by easement or other suitable instrument for a possible future green way on the property. The exact location of this green way area will be determined at site plan review and approval. (5) If a regional Storm water detention facility is constructed on this property, construction of the facility shall incorporate the installation of a paved 10 foot wide green way trail along the entire length of the above referenced green way easement area. (6) Final site plans for the property shall show all required screening and buffering areas as required by the Roanoke County zoning ordinance. (7) All site lighting proposed for the property shall comply with the Roanoke County zoning ordinance and shall not exceed .5 foot candles at adjoining property lines. (8) A minimum of 550 parking spaces shall be provided on the site . 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All 2 S_ii ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\ZONING\WOODSEND.SUP 3 • • ~i ~- ~)P `cp-CEN WI`` ~. I ~~ ~~ 1 CiENERAI NOTES I, TiE PROPERTY SHOWN HFRPIY 6.3W61M1, P6.UtlL31 Alm 8611)-1- ROANORk ('OUN1Y. VIROINI.4. 3. ALL PROPOSED IIMi11 M'/k%IL I ACCORDAhCI W ITI I THE REfiULA DISTRICT 19PEC IAL E%CEPitUN) A AVD APPROVAI. Rt' ROANOKF. Cf PFRMfTS 1. ALL PRR'AIE ROADS, PARKING ST(KKM W ATF,R MA:VA(iEMFNT FA THE OWNIR 4 FlNAL LANOS('APINO SHALL M ROAN'OKF. COLTITY l(1NIN(i nRDI S. AI.L lUN9TRI K'!I(1N SNALI. ('C VIRINNIA DETARTMFNT OF TRAM SPF.('U'ICATIUVS. 6 STORM WATER MAh'AGEMF:NT PRELIMINARt' f AIILOlES SIIOW! PLANS T EROSN)N ANA 9FUIMENT C'ON7 C'ALC'ULATNINS WILL tlt 9URMI f DESIGN 4HALL CONFROM TO STA RF()lI1RFAIF.NTN. R DIE PROMISED GRADES SHUWI / ORAUES, PINAl PLANS SHALL INI 4MUIN(I. WUNUARt'AND TOFU A940CIATFS DA IFD NUtTMNFR d 9. ENTRANCE CONFNiUMT1UNS IiP.NEMTN8N C.41.CVI,ATN%SS AIII ~ ~ APPROVAL RY VI%I'I PRNM Ht TN TRAFTN'IMPA(T STIIDI'ANU TM WILL. BF. MCLMFp IN SUBMISSIO DEPARTMENT (1F TRANSP(MtTA SE Sh9RIL.' 305 SouF CONOEPIi.IRK. RaflgkR Ufte: I-1199 rrv 991101 ~- / / ~~ AOAN ,~~~ ~ _.9 z ~' ~ z ~ a 1838 AGENDA ITEM NO. APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING SUBJECT: ORDINANCE CI IZEN COMMENTS /~io~~, I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize rr>'e during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW; ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT L~IBJ.Y AND GIVE TO HE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ADDRESS: PHONE: O~ POAN ~~` _.~ ~n~ ~'-~i o~ .; AGENDA ITEM NO. 1838 APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~J~~t~~ ~~~::.~t ~-- ;°~:~ ~ " ~:- I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW; ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. . ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Bo#h speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~D ~ G'l/ - ~. y; , ~''~ ADDRESS: ~~ ~~J~y~~ ~~/ ~`-~--- PHONE: ...:~~a ` ~'! ~. °c . f~~ ~~~ O~ POANp~F ti ~ `s:, 9 ~,~~ 2 v ~ a 183a AGENDA ITEM NO I ! APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: -~=. I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/A/ES L/STED BELOW; ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. . ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~` ~ m P S ~~~ r r ~ s v ADDRESS: `3 l ~ ~ -,~ ~ ran P ~~z~ z~,~ ~ ~ K~ r ~,~, PHONE: ~~ Ia ` `~ ~~© O~ POAN ~~` ~ ' <¢+, ~ Z ~ 2 OJ a . 1838 AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ -~~ APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: - ~~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW; ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEG LY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~~P ~QYYJP~ ADDRESS: `7"7'S9 i~2l~tLU6DC~ ~i~. PHONE: /G.~] - oG/~J 8 O~ QOAN ~~G ~ . ~°, 9 Z ar , c, o Z a 1838 AGENDA ITEM NO. I APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING -ORDINANCE _ CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~ ~a ~~ ~/. ~ ~ os~ •~ ~,~.•~,~ U~ ~~-.,~; f ~(• ~ ~ s fi--~c,~- ~ h ~~ ~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. . ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent Them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: .Sc.>S ~~ .Sinc~~e-7l-b~ ADDRESS: ~~/ 7!' Lon ~c LQ.i ~ 02~,0,~. y~4 z~ol~ PHONE: ~~ 9 ' ~ -Z 7~ ~ POAN, ~ O ti ,. ~: ~ z, ~ 2 a 1839 AGENDA ITEM NO.-~~_ APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC NEARING -ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~nc4« ~ L1~~ ~i~~ f " ~ f.~,-~s ~,-~ucf ~ ~7~`~ S~~U~ ~''1~ ~-~:1- -7 - °' I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW; ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. . ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written stafiements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~.YJi /(e ~,-.s ~v ~~ ADDRESS: ~A ~ y~ ~ d PHONE: SY~-~7~ -3b~7 O~ QOAN ~~` ~ 9 o 'c V Z v a 1836 AGENDA ITEM NO. 5 -~~ APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~~ ~ ~ - Gt/D~S ~~ Sjo.~Q~~ G~se l~-e,eJv~ i f I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. . ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ,C,L~h~1 Jr~hns o l~ ADDRESS: r PHONE: / ~~ ~ c~9~ O~ QOANp~~ ~ ' ~r z _ o g 1838 AGENDA ITEM NO. APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING X ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: /Or!)')/ ~ ~Q .C, G(~voals ,~n~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: • Each speaker wild be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. . ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~ ADDRESS: PHONE: `~Y~`~'' O~ QOANO~~` ~- .:, 9 ~ ~ ~ z ~ z a 1839 AGENDA ITEM NO. APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ,..ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS //// SUBJECT: G~~5~2 ~~t~ r" I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW; ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ADDRE PHONE: %.Y7 O~ QOAN ~~ ~.. :rte z o Z a reae AGENDA ITEM NO. ~~ APPEARANCE REQUEST -PUBLIC NEARINGORDINANCE _ CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: '~d - ,~,Q., ~~~/~~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Su ervisors to reco nG~ e duriQn~ the meetin on P 9 9 9 the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ADDRE PHONE: ~`IG " 3~ ~ f O~ MOAN ,~F a ?: 9 ~ G7 ~ Z ov a 1 38 APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~~ - .~nGL.. ~~~~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/D~E BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: AGENDA ITEM NO. S-f~ ^ Each speaker will be given between thre to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The C airman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a present2 clarification may be entertained by the C ~n of his/her point of view only. Questions of irman. ^ ^ ^ All comments must be directed to the E and audience members is not allowed. Both speakers and the audience will rd. Debate between a recognized speaker courtesy at all times. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: (~//) ADDRESS: ~~ rHONE: I /~~~n V O~ ROAN, KF ~ , ;;-~ z, w ~ a 1839 AGENDA ITEM NO. J~ ' ~ APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING :`~ ORDINANCE ~ CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~w)~~~~~-c' ~)~v_i~ }~;lcl~y~(,.lc"~ ~~-, ~~ (~~'r''rc~~,Ul~{- 1•~~/c,~~>~:~ ~-'1 1 I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: .~F ++ ~ c'%~ ~ ~ ~~~ , r )- ADDRESS: ~'~~PCP ~l'Q/~l,(XXXX . ~7'. PHONE: ~~ 9 - 3gCo~ O~ QOAN ~~ ~ , }:. g , a AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ ~~ ~ 1839 APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING x ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS ~. SUBJECT: .~'c c1~1 y ~r ri; ha U'~ ~'YC ~ ~~~c: sic ~ ~ ~ ~.,c~ 1.~5~ ~~ ~c +'~'t, ~'f U~~ ~ ~ ~, hit I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW; ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~~C~.v IL ~;~+ ~% ~ L ADDRESS: Zj ~~ 1 ~ h i~ 'i~G ~~~ ~~'~-~ti~~c~~~r a Y~f~ ~ZK~~~S PHONE: I ~t5~~ - d ~ ~~ s ~i ~~ JOAN ~~~ ~ gs9 Z ' ~ G? o Z a 1839 AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ - ~ APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ~ ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~~'<C~ n ~ ~ e'c: c~;,,c;,~ r'; ~ ~'~c~ ~ ,~c: tier ~ ~~r/c ~c~ L~~~, ~'Y n~t ~ ~- I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. . ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD ,. NAME: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ C ~~~~ ADDRESS: ~ ( ~lI L~ ~ ~ ~4 ~~. , i `~ ~~ , ~ ~ j ~bC,,, ~~~c~' t~/-1 ~ 1 ~C. I ~S PHONE: rJrl~' ~D /o~ O~ QOANp,Y~ ~, ;,9 w ~` , ~ ~ o~ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~' "' ~ ~ 1839 APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING SUBJECT: ORDINANCE ~~ ~~~~ ~. CITIZEN COMMENTS I would tike the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW; 1 ^ Each speaker wild be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. . ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: A ADDRESS: ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~'~ 'L.~ PHONE: ~ .~~, ~`~~ ~ ~ O~ JOAN kF ~ , ",~,, 9 Z ~ G> o Z v a 1 38 AGENDA ITEM NO. ~~"~~ APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING X ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: S~' ~~ j ~ ' .c~ i /1C~ U' ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ V1C.~.n=tC _ ~j~E~~ i ~~._( ~!J~' ~' ~~til ~ -~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may, comment. _ WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL//VES L/STED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~l ~~r'~ YC;-~ ~~; c~ ~ ~ ADDRESS: ZI PHONE: ~ ~~ `~ -U~ a -3 O~ QOANp~F ~ , ~'„ 9 z a 1838 AGENDA ITEM NO. ~~"~ f APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~~ ~~~:a~ ` : r~; i ~~t. ;~ } ~~ti~' ~ ~~c~•; ~° { ~ r~~~ ~~~ y ,~ ~ ~~ ~- I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. . ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD .~ NAME: ~, - ~ ~~ / -, ADDRESS: ~~S ~~~ ~~J~ rc~c..~c..~ 1.)Li ~ ~ ~f ~loc~ ~?~ /~r ~,/~ ~ (~C' l PHONE: 77a -~l~ C~5 POAN ~ F o`~ . ~ rVENI iy ~ ScsS~aN ,, ~ .. . ~~ ; AGENDA ITEM NO. ~. //, APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING X ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS ~' ECO N~ /?~-~ n1N'C~ ~~ ~" ~- ~ ~i~i/ t-- .re -~" ~B v[3Td9 JN ~ SUBJECT: •r'r'Cc/~ i.. l,~S ~ ~E-°z~/T TU c~i/s T2t~ ~°- ~ J~~6H <S ci,~o o~.,, ~ Loe/9T~C~ ot~ 77~£-Lc~ES7"~1~~ DF`B2y~3~~UOV pr/='~ L=7"~,Ci. I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW; ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. - ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~~-~,/ Gt/C~ %7~.~./ ADDRESS: ~ ~ 7~ ~'~'~~-u~S,E3 ~2 5'" C~-T. PHONE: ~7~ -D ~ q c~ O~ ROAN ~~ ~- as A Z " ;=;r . G7 ~ Z ov a 1838 AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ I APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC NEARING ORDINANCECITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: 'I`~~. h'~~~u I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~C:l~~l~'~~C~.. IZC~i`~C~ ADDRESS: ;~> 17 ~,.~~~`,~IIr~~,~ C~i~ ~~ PHONE: ~( `~` ~I- :3~~ ~~> O~ QOAN ~~` ~~ A z ~ ~' ~~ a 1838 AGENDA ITEM NO: S"~ APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~ ~ ~-~~"~~~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TD THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW; ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at al(times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD _._~~ ._.r-. NAME: ~~ ~ ~~-~~ ~~ ~~C~ ~ t ~~ ADDRESS: --~ l~~'- ~ ~~ ``a~;'1-~~~~'~; t;',:~~~5 ..~~~ PHONE: ~ ~ ~ - ~ +~ C.' ?~~ ~~ QOAN ~~~ ~ , 'e, z ~~ , ~ ~ Z o a r as AGENDA ITEM NO. ~_ APPEARANCE REQUEST '~ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~ f~ ~n l~ ~~ i ~ SL ~ o ~ L- I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL//VES L/STED BELOW; ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~~E~E ~J m ~L,(: ADDRESS: ~~~~P CFI/`~~ U~~~~e J PHONE: ~ / 2-' ~O ! ~Z~ O~ POAN ,f.~` ti 9 z =,v.;~ ~ z c a 1838 AGENDA ITEM NO. APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING -ORDINANCE _ CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: 0 '00~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. . ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Bo#h speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall hle with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~I,~/ `_, ADDRESS: GC ~ PHONE: ~ ~~~ "'~.5'I O~ p~OANp~.~ ~ '.,, A ti ~~ z o V a 1 39 AGENDA ITEM NO. APPEARANCE REQUEST (/PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT:~~-~' I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. . ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~ ~Lc ADDRESS: 6 ~` ~ ( PHONE: ~ U ~ ~~~ 4 ~ O~ QOANp~~` ~ . ;~: ~ ~ / o~ a AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ - ~ 1838 APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: _t~C~~-K~~-~~E~-~-~ ~ ~~i 1 ~ L' ~GC~l~2~ 1 ~- "v~G~S I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL//VES L/STED BELOW; ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: Ml~t~~ ~ ~~~G ~ ADDRESS: ~~5~ t ~1NC~ r~~~lA~`(~~-(L ~~ , PHONE: ~~a J~l~bC7G1 0~ QOAN ,~~` ~ ~; z ~ ~ z ov a 1838 AGENDA ITEM NO. S ` ~ ~ APPEARANCE REQUEST ~UBLIC HEARING V ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS t SUBJECT: 7~d~~.::.~ `~PPa~~~, ~. ,,..`~a~ ~ ~..`,~~.,~,.'~ ~~ i ~ ~~~ ~(~~ mod'". I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, !AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ ^ u ^ ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. . All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~~ ADDRESS: ~ ~ ~;~ ~~ ~ ~` # ~ ~.:~,-~,-~ ,~, ~ ~ y ~~ PHONE: `~ ~,,.:~~ ..., }~~ ~ a:.~. ~~ POANp~~~ ~ ~ _ e ~ ~~ o~ . ~ AGENDA ITEM NO. 1838 APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE ~ CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: I~~u7 }~ ~~ ~ S,~n~)I I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW; ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. . ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~ C~l ~ ~ ADDRESS: ~~ ~~ '1~~-~~ 1~.1„~d ~,~ PHONE: ! ~ yI -' ~ ~`~ ~ O~ AOAN ~~` ~.. z' ~ ~ z Ov a 1838 AGENDA ITEM NO. ~_ APPEARANCE REQUEST -PUBLIC HEARINGORDINANCE SUBJECT: `~.`~'""""`~ ~L~i ~/hc~,, CITIZEN COMMENTS I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW; ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. . ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ADDRE PHONE ~ ~~ ROAN ~~~ ~' 9 z .- c' o Z ~ a 1838 AGENDA ITEM NO. S "" Jl APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC NEARING -ORDINANCE ~ CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: p c~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW; ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall frle with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: 1 ' t ~ IG+.; v~~ ~a v ADDRESS: ~GS~ ~ ~ W ~ • I~--l-'Y PHONE: "Ig Q' 0 a ~ r ~ POANp~~ ~ 9 Z .~ AGENDA ITEM NO. ,S ! l/ o _Z J a 1839 APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: 36'DpS~I le+ I//f~~ ~-1~ would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ~IDDRESS FOR THE RECORD. /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW; ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. . ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements andlor comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: !~ ADDRESS: ~lt ~~ !'lr~ ~ moo ~ e~ PHONE: ~4QhaK~ ~~ 2 ~0~~ RT U S E U1~1 O F W F S T F R N V I R G l N l A Capital Request The ArtVenture educational center in the Art Museum is in the process of being relocated from its current location in the upstairs back of the building (two blocks from the building's main entrance) to the ground floor immediately adjacent to the main entrance and to Market Square, to give it the best location we have for maximum visibility and access. At the same time, ArtVenture is being completely redesigned and expanded to make it more exciting and absorbing, at a cost of $253,000. This will greatly enhance the experience it provides to Roanoke County residents. This project is now being designed by the internationally-recognized firm Design in 3D of Toronto, and is scheduled to open to the public in April, 2000. We ask that Roanoke County provide 10% of phis cost, or $25,000. Educational Programs The Art Museum provides two types of educational programs. ArtVan is a mobile program that visits local sites in a 13-county area, where 15,000 students participate in educational exhibitions. Meanwhile another 5,000 students a year visit the ArtVenture center in the Museum itself. In the past year ArtVan drew 5,175 students from Roanoke County (representing Glen Var High, Hidden Valley Junior High, Mountain View Elementary, Fort Lewis Elementary, and Cave Spring Elementary) to five week-long New Harvest from Old Roots exhibitions. In the previous year, week-long exhibitions of Feathered Serpents and Pyramids of the Sun (pre-Columbian art) were held at William Byrd Middle School, Cave Spring High, Bent Mountain Elementary, Glen Cove Elementary, Green Valley Elementary, Mount Pleasant Elementary, and Northside Middle School. In the past year ArtVenture attracted 41 class visits including 1,025 students to the Museum for the Vessels Through the Ages learning experience. At the request of Roanoke County schools, this was a 40% increase in the number of groups over the previous year. Of the 20,000 students involved in these two educational programs, 6,200 (31 %) came from Roanoke County. The Art Museum's educational programs cost a total of $108,633 (31 % of the total cost would be $33,676). Funding provided by Roanoke County was $6,100 (5.6% of the costs), including $4,10'0 from the County Schools and $2,000 from the County Government. The shortfall ($25,576) was left to the Art Museum to raise, in order to make these programs available to Roanoke County students. These funds are becoming more difficult to raise at a time when the Art Museum will have to raise both $253,000 in capital funds to redesign and relocate ArtVenture, and perhaps $12-15 million to renovate the Grand Building to become the Museum's new home. Please help us by paying a more proportionate share of the Roanoke County usage, 7'he Art Museum is the only museum in the Roanoke Valley that is accredited by the American Association of Museums, yet Roanoke County funds the Art Museum at 6% - 27% of what it funds other metropolitan cultural organizations. The Art Museum requests $10,000 to help operate these vital programs used so extensively by Roanoke County residents. CENTER IN THE SQUARE, ONE MARKET SQUARE Sl;, SECOND FLOOR, ROANOKE, VIR<iINIA 24011-1436, (540) 342-5760, Fnx (540) 342-5798 Bu[tu Punter, Pr~~'ate Collect ArtVan Eshibition5 in Local conununitie N Ew ARV EST ~~~ c~~,D x.ooTs ARTISANS OF THE BLUE RIDGE REGION Artvan Presents Regional Traditions Ner~• Han-est from Old Roots is the new Artvan outreach project. from the Art Museum of Western Virginia. This traveling exhibition provides an an•ay of art and educational activities, and will be available to schools and community centers through June 2000. This acclaimed project highlights hand-crafted traditions of the Blue Ridge Mountain region. Hometown Pride Netiv Han~est front Ohi Roots demonstrates the evolution of our dynanuc mountain heritage. Objects crafted by contem- porary artisans in our region are presented with artifacts from the 19th century. Featured craftspeople who live and work in the counties of Bedford, Botetourt, Craig, Floyd, Franklin. Giles, Montgomery, Pulaski, and Roanoke who continue to explore the traditions of our region. Providing the Tools to Teach The Museum will deliver and install a professionally presented exhibition of artifacts at your school for one week. An inservice is provided by Art Museu educators at each site. The project com alive through the use of photograpns, rnusrc, Fnnms~, ~,Froa;a m3p,c and videos. A teacher's guide, multi-disciplinary 199s n>' Mark st. Lcdyer activities with SOL links, a scripted slide set, and a hands-on "Discovery Cart" provide accessible tools ~ easily integrated into existing lesson plans. Violin, wrlY maple and sdV. 199- M- Arthur Connor A History of Educational Success In an era of tests and accountability, this new Artvan exhibit delivers! Educators will enjoy an alternative, cross-curricular, fr~n way to teach. New Harvest front Old Roots engages students in direct, multi-sensory experiences. Students ai•e intrigued, get invoh~ed, and retain what they learn. A Win/~Vin Program The Artvan project may be sponsored by your school district, local PTA, PTO, other organizations, or corporate sponsors. Contact the Art Museum of Western Virginia at 540/224-1223 to learn how to provide this cost-effective learning opportunity for your students. ART MUSEUM OF WESTERN VIRGINIA /'~ ,, ~ ,~ ~ICZt,, ~~. ~~~ ~ Cti~ f~ ' v~~.,E. ~~~` . ArtVenture Hands-on education at the Museum ' r w ~~ _ ~~o~n ~ o'er. ~ ~:n~ A ~. ~o ~• ~ ~ w •_o ;: n w ~.xc'~5~~ r~ o ~c G4 ~° ~°F~q 'tD ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - IA `'~-~R" C Q, -A_~y_ ~qfi'~-_ O -~- rte, ~~ ~C.,~ ~ ~ ~ o -gyp C ,y ; ~ <D ~ ~ ~ (p --r f~D N ~'. ~C er „~pq -' e~ A ,. ~ ~ !D ~A . LD , fD ~D °~' - et fC ~: '-~cD _ 5 A c o'~~';w ~.~~:°+~c ~~•~fD ~ _° w ° ;~'r.~~,d ~v~. ¢., -* ~ p.~w O ~ ~~5 ~o -~: ~~°~e a~w ~,'+ a5 ° ~~fo' ~+ ~ ~ w c~ o ~ o w ~~ ~x m a_. m s x-. oa v . c~ a ~ ~' <`. o w ~ o- O co o~x ~. ~,,o ~* A - .~ ~ - o ~ A ~~'o_ x"coco5m`<_o ~~~ ~co_ og ~A ~'~0~'5'~v~~°~~ ~€s'-c~n'°y`:~' ~*°' a 7G" M W ert . O !D - ~ ~ G fD er " ~ ."~ fD fD ~ -~ R. i7 ~ y tp W O n ~ ~ ', ~ - ~ p, ~* ~" ~ ~ ~ .: to A m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ cp `~ [~ +n Q _"~ ~ ~• w ~ O ~ -~ G -~. w .6.~~fD.;p.!!•."~''cp_ crfD Oc ,.Q C cD-.~~.w.~A ~~ fD fD~b~`.~..`~..~ A~C~~'~' c~D'c~ ° O A - fD O . O: A C ~. 7S' :1' fo ~ ~ ~ C A ~~qq 1~~~' "~' ~ . ~-• ~D ~'' x - . O'~ ~S ".3 w g ~ 'T : A ~'. fF-' A ~ ~ ~ ~n C ~p' ~ :°.. ~ ~ p, A ., ~Jr ~+ cp = o ~ ao = f~ . x~ ~' ~-. • ' p K co °' ° A ~ 5 5• ~: ° m -.. A ~ ~-. ~o ~ ° . `° x `° ~',.° ~ +. coo `~ _..a..coo ~~~, ~~~'do; ~~'Q-~C~ m~'°AU5 ~.~~._ A ~~,~..~ot]fD. bm- ~ c ~ ~ co ~~~' ~ , m C ~ ~ ~ ~ r°p •°sr ' ~ A co 5 ~ A `n cn p, a co .,, ~-' co ~Q co ~"oe _ `" ~ , ~ cD ~ cD ~ -i w O ~• ~ ~ O- O x' ~ ~ C C ~ O A w ~ .~ ".S' ' •~" ~ ~ p~ O i A r`~i w ~ ~ rr ~ ~ d co fD ~ ti ~ a. ~C m ~ ~ -+ m °. ~c co m ro ~' A co m sA •, ~ ~ R. co ~io' ~' oX 5i 1. ,io ~~~.'' cyc 5• w ~ ~'• ~ ~ ~ 00 ~t cD O ~* ~ r. i ~' ~-' 69 ~-+~'~. • 'Lf G A A w '~ C7 A 5 '~ z ^ ~ ~ Cf ~ ~ ~' ~ - ~ ~ 'b 't7 O ~ 5~ CD M 5' " ~ w ~ ~ CO y e* "~' (D A O ~ ~' w~;"~. 0--~i..~~py ;~C, x~~,r- -co- ~ ~-ex w < A ~, O 7 k C 04'O cD f A O (D cn .O A^ y w~ ~ ~ w" ..: 's- 0 oc Ap~ ~ ~ to p ts. 0a cn co ~-- ~.. a, ~ v. G± ~ °- ~-- _.'C . ~ C/] ti A- w- ' ~. ~° 5' ~ a.° ~ ~ ~ A tr A A ocn° m .yA 0 5•~ ~tdr~. co 'd ~a.~o,~Gy. ~ ~ r~r'~'R."_"_G eD .: ~. G ~ O ~ `~' . ,O,ti fD ~ ~ -~ C e~+ p A e-r ~ GL ,',-s m C2. '3 sC Gj ~ oy+ ~' `C ems, A 'Cf '~' ~ 'p 5 5 . 0 ~ `C ~ ~ A A a, w ~ ~ '~ :; ~ ~q ~ cD .A,j ,d p ~ ~ ~i ° cD '-„ c. ~ ~ C' w w ~ 04 " ~p ~ ~ K A A ° o ~ ~ v. ~p ~ ~}, ... ~* °s fD ~ ~ A w (D A ry .y O co d4 o C O '"~ A A ..• C'' Ao d ;3' C ^~' CY d <+ ~ A m el -e'' - r~ C I ~ A V r '~" a• ~ .e+ O r~ayy ~-s ,'3 O '~' p~ w A e9 fD aC w 'S' ~ 'S pp ~! .- crt -~ M '"~ fD 'J' ~y lD e* 5~ ~~ ~f w O O ~,. tC y ~C p ~.. ~~, "~" cn~s F y ~ (D O '."' et ~ /D ~ ~~~'+ H A ~ O C ~~' ~' ER 'Sy C~~ ry ~... ~ m CY e* cn CA A •A.t tp ¢' ~ w O lD C "Aa ~ to V' O ~ A ~ ~ b CY ,~, M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C f~D [~~~. ' e..~ ~ ~A-! ry~ O iC ~, v + ~ ~~l ~ Q4 "O~' w m+ V, A ~ p~+ " R. 04 w A er ~'* ~ C,., O ~ w ~ (G9 5 p vAi y A ~ ~ O w ~ A ¢' O ~ ~ f~D ~ ~ F ~ G ti 'C cZD ~ `~ ~.' P> 't1 ¢ M w O to '+ ~ '•~ ~ • + ~ w ~ A . ~' ~x~~.~w A a°'~~~o ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ o m ° `~ ~°•a-~ `'• ~'" ~m R:~ o ~=~ o c a' z~ ° h'o'c o~ :; ~w ~ a~ ~ 5 ° ~'.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o A ° ~ ~ w p~~ 5 ~o n m c~~co ~~'dy ~~ o °''bc~o ~ c`D° a° ~ ~~ `~' 'C3 ~? O ,~~' ~ - w e~ ~c~o ~' 'z7 O- Q- ~ co ~ "~" ~ o 'OF' ~. to ~ °' ~_ a'wr ~ '~' ' eo w ~ ~. ~ o w o .r, e. ~ ~c w ~ "y O ° lrD ~ a •~• n (D `.~ ~ ° ~+ ~ ~ ~ A ~° ~ m ~ '~' f9 m Q, G. '' ~ ~ p ~ ~ '~~' !D A A w ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ a' co G; M ~, ~ o+ ~' ti o A A cJ, ~ ~ ~ ~ o 'C ~ ° °' S ~c o' fn' vOi O ~ A 5 'L7 e+ CA ~ ~-. y ~..~ ~ A A eo A I ~ ~ C C ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ "1 "~ w ~ e•r ~ G •t 04 O '3 A '~' ~ .y i-- ~ A ~ 5 ~ G .Art, 'b O :-s ~ C `rt 'd lD lD O A e+ ~ ~~• ~ ~ ~ ~ d4 C7 rJ-' ~ ~-.~ A ~* ~ ~, ~ M ~ . ~ ~ ~ 5 ~ m A A A w ~+ ~. A ~ ~. R. G ~. W v, ~ ~' o w v, "' p ~ ` =u '~ ' O O ~ ~ A O x' cD ~. ~ ~, C ~ CD '~" ~ . cr CD c1• ~. O '~' CA 'C ~ w to C~D p. c o ~ Q' ~ t r- ., - g A ~ ~, ~ ,~ ~. ~:,~ ~ {{ tt x ~ N'C3 'p r? £F ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~K~ =rc .y ~ l n,a. "O N <~ 'w ~ ~ '" k ri I ,. ; O A fl-"O ~ -~, 'D O~ r~~ ~ a A Q p n m o v " ~'1s ~ ,• ,• D ~ m as ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~"~' cu w~a m f ~• -1 O O ~~ • . x. _~ fn "C CD p ~ n '~~` t b o •~ fD ~ C ~ ~ "' w, t ,~'~ i i ~ ~ ~ . ~. ~~ ~ ~ 3 :k ! A o ~ „~ _.w~' ?_ s .fee tfi { ; fD 3 C C Z ~ ~ R '- ~ r+ O ~ ~ ate. i- .~ -C'. ~ ry ~ °~~r 'x E ` ~ '~7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~}! ~~ S~ ~ ~ jib iC. S `~"`f ~~ N ~ ~i o ~ ~ p ~' n QU e~ ~ ~ N !!~~,,,~ ' n'rt ~. ~ ~` et:.~: !~ i ''v o,r ~ ~~oun~5a~i3°?~~~o ~~ ~ ~ s~ ~ ~ ~ ~y tea" ~o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ ap ~ Z ~.~ o o ~~ ~ ~~~ 0 3 ~ ~ ~ ~o~ y _ • b G~ o y ~ F" '~' ~ ~ ~ ~ c~ ~ ten" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ W Z ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ to ~, ~ 'C 0- ~ -~ Cd CL U .,~ .,' U x ~ y .~ ~ cd ~ ^~ ~ ~~ rl ~ ~ ^~ l r M •~ Z C = y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O N ~_ ~~ V H ~ '~ O ^~ L a ~ Q ~+':~ Q Z ~• C7 ~_ ~' ~ ~ Y Z n Q - _ ~ WItRORD ON ~ a ° +~ m O~ € ~ n CW O ~++ ~~ ~s ~~e W f° ~ a~ c i ~ S a N ~ a~i w ~ Z ~~ -~ > m W = U ~ Z a J ~ v `L 1EFFERSON STREET z~= ~ W o ~ v=v°i _ ~ _y.. ~ ~ G ~ ~ ~U w ~=- ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ W _ Y Z~ Q W FIRST STREET V ~ C3 y o~~~ ~, 3W NW ~~ cv ~ n WZ m o E°~ W W ~ ~ ~¢ O r WV~~ ~ / y iii 7,~~ v ~ SSREEt Q E~pND F O h Z N Z S 0 z W Y ti ~~ 'd i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O '~- (6 U 110 O ~ N ~ ~O (n ~ ~ O N fl, m c6 +~-' ~ C_ ~ U~0 ~ N ~ O ~ ~~i~U •~ ~ ~ o >a~~~ E o ~ ~ ~ = O 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ _ ~ N N y ~ L ~ O > N ~ '~ ¢ O Q O d. +-' O ~ ~ ~ ~ O c0 ~ H+.~U O o~ o~ o~ •N a~ ~" O D r,,, ~a U „b .~, G~ ~ o > ~ ~ ~ d~ A ~~~~ p.,~ o~~ CJ ~„ ~ ~ •~ ~ ~ a.~ '~ ~ ~, w -' ~ C W ,UZ-, W Q: Y Y ~_ m r March 23, 1999 Good afternoon, Mr. Hodge, and members of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. I am Jim Ford, President of the Board of Directors of the Roanoke Symphony Society. I am pleased to be here this afternoon on behalf of musicians, staff, volunteers, and our audience, and perhaps most importantly the over 20,000 children we reach each year. We are grateful for the County of Roanoke's past financial support of our work. In 1998 our educational outreach programs allowed us to reach approximately 14,000 Roanoke County students of which 61 % were in elementary schools. Aristotle said, "Music has the power of producing a certain effect on the moral character of the soul, and if it has the power to do this, it is clear that the young must be directed to music and must be educated in it." Likely you have read in articles and books such as "The Mozart Effect" that educators are discovering that classical music can improve students' work in many areas of their scholastic life, including SAT scores. Our in-school ensembles provide young children with the exciting opportunity to observe and interact with professional musicians in a school setting. Filled with information and ready to have fun, each ensemble focuses attention on a specific family of instruments in the orchestra. Children are not only allowed, but also encouraged to ask questions and be involved in the educational process. They can see and touch the mysterious instruments that make the wonderful sounds. True enthusiasm is seen in a child's eye when he or she has the freedom to explore the exciting world of music. The open and enthusiastic style exhibited by the performing musicians and David Wiley, our music director, makes these programs successful. Maestro Wiley's enthusiasm for involving the children and young adults is contagious; it has spread to our musicians and even the children themselves. To make sure there is the best ensemble available we established the Educational Advisory Committee. This committee develops programs designed to fit the needs of the educational community. It consists of both teachers and supervisors from the academic population, along with musicians from the ensemble groups themselves and symphony board members. This committee assists in determining which Standards of Learning (SOL) will work best within the ensemble program, with specific focus on the K through 12 programs. The four core subjects of Math, History, English, and Science are all touched upon. Demonstrating this relationship between subjects and showing how they affect each other is one of the most valuable lessons which can be taught. We have received overwhelming praise from both teachers and students. With all the recent attention to the Standards of Learning requirements, it is no wonder this program has become even more important and timely. With the assistance of this Committee, our Education Director has developed a music education program which can be integrated into the regular classroom subjects. The Director decides what teaching methods will work best and match with the visiting ensemble and the respective SOL. Audio tapes and educational games and puzzles are created to involve the students in the learning process. The Director videotapes the performance and then reviews the ensembles' interaction with those in the classroom. This review is used to critique and improve future performance and teaching methods. It is out of this constantly improving process and with the suggestions of the Advisory Committee, the In-School ensemble booklet was developed. It took more than three months to create, and is a forty-six page advisory and reference book for teachers. This removes the burden of class preparation from the teacher; in essence, everything needed for the ensemble class time is provided within this booklet. Two copies of this guide are provided free of charge to each school, and it may also be fully accessed via the Internet. We are leaving two for your review with the request they be returned when finished, as they are somewhat costly to prepare. Other outreach programs specifically targeted to reach young children are our "Adventures in Music" for children in grades 6-8 and "Discovery Concerts" geared toward grades 3 through 5. These concerts are held at the Roanoke Civic Center; admission is $1.50 per student and free for teachers. Educational materials are also available for these programs as well. "Nights at the Soundtable" is an educational program primarily for adults through age 100, though that can be extended. We would invite you to attend in a relaxed informal setting which enriches us. This is a free evening of music and refreshments enjoyed by approximately 80 primarily adult people and is held on the Wednesday prior to each of our Classics concerts. I have only mentioned a few of our outreach programs; however, I will leave for you some additional brochures regarding many of our other educational opportunities. As you may know, ticket sales cover only one-third of our costs. We receive support from individuals, corporations, private foundations, and public funds. Your support goes toward funding a part of our children's educational program. Roanoke County has been a faithful supporter of our work and we ask you to continue to support our programs and to consider increasing the level of financial support for next season. Thanks again. Your consideration is much appreciated. c. 'stern ~~'~Virginia Land Trust P. O. Box 18102 County of Roanoke, Virginia Roanoke, Virginia 24014-0797 Meeting of the Board of Supervisors March 23, 1999 Phone/Fax 540/985-0000 Presentation of the Western Virginia Land Trust E-mail mraitlerC~aol.com Mr. Chairman, Members of the Board, Mr. Hodge, good evening. I am M. Rupert ExECUTivE DIRECTOR Cutler of 2865 S. Jefferson Street, Roanoke. I am the Executive Director of the Western Dr. M. Rupert Cutler Virginia Land Trust. Its offices are at 2217 Crystal Spring Avenue in Roanoke. Thank you for your past support of the land trust. I am requesting a grant of $5,000 for our locally based conservation group for the upcoming fiscal year. BOARD OF TRUSTEES Barbara B. Lemon The Western Virginia Land Trust is a 501(c)(3) charity incorporated in 1996. Its President mission is to work with private landowners in a voluntary way to save western Virginia's natural and cultural heritage. Let me give you some examples of its activities that help Mary Ann Johnson implement the open space goals of your new Roanoke County community plan: Vice President Murray K. Coulter Jr. • Hosting community educational forums on such subjects as estate planning for land , Treasurer conservation, environmentally sensitive site planning, and how to slow forest fragmentation. Forest fragmentation harms water quality and wildlife habitat and Elizabeth H. Belcher depletes the raw material supply for the forest products industry. Secretary Charles A. Blankenship • Accepting and holding gifts of private land for later transfer to public park systems E. Cabell Brand as greenway trail rights of way. The Lick Run Greenway project is an example. E. A. "Archie" Campbell • Holding perpetual conservation easements on private farm and forest land, jointly Lynn M. Davis with the Virginia Outdoors Foundation, to protect views from the Blue Ridge Parkway and the Appalachian Trail, protect watershed integrity, and help perpetuate Lucy R. Ellett the community's farming and forestry economic base. We were the first entity to be Sibyl N. Fishburn approved by the Board of Trustees of the Virginia Outdoors Foundation as a co- David P. Hill holder of conservation easements with that state agency. We jointly hold a conservation easement on a 169-acre farm in Franklin County near Windy Gap. Robert H. Hunt George A. Kegley • Serving on Roanoke County citizens' advisory committees to provide land conservation-related input. Examples include the County's Visioning Steering Robert B. Lambeth, Jr. Committee and development of the new Community Plan, the telecommunications Stephen W. Lemon tower policy, and the ongoing study of cluster housing ordinances. Jack Loeb, Jr. • Inventorying critical private lands adjoining the Blue Ridge Parkway, the Jefferson Leonard A. Muse National Forest, and the Appalachian Trail, to enable us to prioritize our efforts and Janet Scheid target for possible voluntary conservation easements those private lands most important to the mission of the public parks and forests. Catherine B. Smeltzer Will F. Trinkle We enjoy a close, mutually beneficial working relationship with the County's James M. Turner, Jr. planning, economic development, and park and recreation staffs. Your support of the Western Virginia Land Trust enables us to serve the citizens of Roanoke County in very John B. Williamson, III tangible ways. Thank you. James Wilson James L. Woltz A publicly supported charitable organization providing voluntary means to promote the preservation of western Virginia's natural and cultural heritage f;'.. BLC~'E RIDGE BQSIYESS JOUR~:\L DECEMBER 1993 REPRt~T Warehouses of good will Area food banks efficiently serve the less fortunate 'We're here ro make serre there is food in ucrr end of the tirorld' and if yoccr business helps, it ma~~ be eligible fur state tczr credit BY BEY CALLO~L':1t' Blue Ridge Region business owners and employees put a lot of energy and focus into their work, but they are more than willing to pause and give generously to requests from charities, especially this time of year. What they rarely see or know is just how effec- tively their dollars are being used to mitigate social prob- lems in their communities. Meeting the basic needs of life is at the core of dealing with society's needs, and none more so than hunter. The Blue Ridge Region has a surprising level of need for food and a highly effective network of committed volunteers and agencies working to see that food is collected and distrib- uted to those with emergency food needs. "A national study by the Peat Marwick accounting firm in Chicago indicates that for every $1 in donations, we can distribute $11.45 in food to needy families, about five meals per dollar," says Judi Huffman, resource develop- mentofficer at Southwest Vir- ginia Second Harvest Food Bank on Shenandoah Avenue in Roanoke. "Food banks and their associated agencies are the most cost-effective way to get food out to hungry peoplz. 1~~'e are here to make sure there is food in our end of the world." To that end, Second Harvest and its associated agencies collected and distributed morn than si.x million pounds~f' food in 1997, about~mil- liun mews, Huffman says. Sec- and Harvest has branches in Covington and Abingdon, and a Galax subsidiary. The organization works in 26 coun- ties and 11 cities, Roanoke and west. in an area that in- cludesthe 10 poor- est counties in Virginia. The organiza- tion is now in the middle of its an- nual campaign to raise $400,000 for .E the 1998-1999 fis- cal year, with a di- rect mail appeal going out the first week in Decem- ber. Corporations which donate $900 or more may be eligible for Virginia Ivei~_hborhood State Tax Credits. Second Har- vest in this region began in 1981, Huffman says, as an af- filiate of the national Second Harvest effort to collect and distribute food that would oth- erwise be thrown a\vav. Among its activities is "gleaning." a biblical concept which ursed farmers to leave a small portion of their grain or fruit in the fields for the pour, who would perform a second harvest. If that seems a slow or ar- chaic way to gather perfectly edible food, consider that in one recent outing. '0 people gleaned ?,400 pounds of apples off the ground in about three hours. "A busload of volunteers often can pick up thousands of pounds of food in a relatively short time," Huffman says. The more focal the oppor- tunity,the more food bank, are interested because it greatly reduces the cost of transporting large amounts of food. I' Huffman says. "One er- 7•?ample of this i~ Pizza Hut. which friezes it lefawer piz- zas, holds t~,~m t~,n:il the end of the \\ eek. and then they are picked up.'. Food banks du nut distrib- ute food directly to needy fami- lies and individuals. To accom- plish the herculean feat of set- tin` six million pounds of food to hungry households. Second Hari est relies on its 410 non- profit. charitable membera~en- cies. called "Food pantries" to set the food to its final desti- nation. Pantries are often church- run organizations manned by churh volunteers who meet the nezd in a particular area of a cin or county. A pantry may operate a soup kitchen, provide food for low-income day care centers. or collect lists of fam- ilv emery ency food assistance nezd, and pick the items up at the food bank. "Even with our hundreds of member pantries," Huffman saes. "there is increasins chili povert} in ~'ir_inia ar.d some very rural aria; are not being ser\ e1. The,e are areas where there is little or no employment and families constantly live on the ed_~e ut di;;uter." Familie., ran come w nee emer ~encv t~~~~~1 a~ii,sr.:_ Businesses can close in areas where there is nu similar em- ployment opportunity; people may lack transportation to a job, or fixed-income retirees may be unable ro reach a store where they can shop for food more cheaply. Huffman says a lack of affordable day care, medical crises, divorce or the death or a spouse can all tris- gereconomic crises leading to hunger. In Virginia, nearly 50 per- cent of those who go hunsry are children. and 28 percent of the state's families live in pov- erty. "Sometimes, it is just the reality of living in a very rural area without a job. or just be- ing amember of the working poor who earn some money, but not enoush to take care of a family." Huffman says. Better-paying jobs are the key. she says. The lamest seg- ment ofthe population in need is the workin~~ poor, ineludin, those who have transitioned from welfare to work and are still at or bel~n\ the poverty level. "!n th~:e situations, whin >um~ur; v. h~~ pr,~v i_le; fur a f.~n.!I~ ~t, ,i~l.. there is no Second Harvest Food Bank's Pam Irvine (left) and Judi Huffman in the warehouse, from n here food is distributed throughout the region t~QNDAY, MARCH 15, 1999 PAGE A8 --~: EDITORIALS Food banks strain to help the working poor Desp2te the rob•tcst national and state economy, emergency food agencies are struggling to solve the dilemma of htcnger amid general prosperity. Y IN THE iVIIDST of plenty, the un- employed, disabled and working poor in Southwestern Virginia have been straining the capacity of food banks and other emergency food programs to meet the growing demand. The paradox is a troubling reminder that vibrant economies do not necessarily lift all boats. According to Pam Irvine, director of the Southwestern Virginia Second Han•est Food Bank that serves 26 counties and 11 cities, the number of working poor families w•ho come to the emergency-food centers has been steadily increasing - a trend that persists throughout the United States. The Roanoke-based food bank each month serves an average of more than 36,000 clients directly and through 414 nonprofit charities. In the last seven years, the amount of food distributed to those agencies has increased by 206 percent. Last year, Irvine's organization conducted a survey showing that 11.3 percent of food recipients were employed; 12.6 percent had lost jobs within the last si.K months; and 39.1 percent had been unemployed at some time during the previous si.Y months - during a period when unemployment hov- ered at historic lows nation- wide and in Virginia. For those currently em- ployed, Irvine said, 41.2 percent earned between 56.16 and 56.50 per hour, <i-~d :36.:3 percent earned be- :-•~•een d.61 and 55 per ..:.~ - :".Ole t11a ; t1LrN~- fourths of them within the official federal designation of poverty. After paying rent, utilities and other neces- sary e~c~penses, those families were hard-pressed to put groceries on the table. ', To meet the nutritional needs of the total population in poverty in Southwestern Virginia, according to a national food bank study last year, ~, emergency food agencies would need ', to distribute more than 37 million pound; of food. For Southwestern 'I Virginia, Irvine said, local agencies distributed 6.4 million pounds -less than 20 percent of the projected need. I At the same time, the supply of food contributed by traditionally large donors to food banks and soup kitchens has been declining through- out the country. Many major food processors and retail outlets have streamlined their operations to become more efficient, thus reducing waste that usually went to charitable organizations. Market forces also hac•e caused retail grocery chains, produce wholesalers and restaurants to impose greater efficiencies, although Irvine was quick to point out that those sources continue to work with Second Harvest to find "creative" ways to bal- ance supply with demand. Gleaning and federal commodities fill much of the gap, but the gap i, Mill widening. In a nation of seemingly limitless bountt•. the effects of economic efficiency are falling espe- ci~L_ h~u•d or. the «•orli~,g pOO:'. YOUR CALL• What doyou think about the issues raised in these editona!s? To offer your opin- ion, please call 981-3109 or, ou'- side the Roanoke Valley, 1-800- 346-1234, exten- sion 109, and leave avoice-^-.a message. ~'/e'I! pubiisn a s2iec~ ~- c° r=;~ons~s. SATURDAY, i=EBRI.'ARY 20, 1999 • ~. *.. _ ~' ' ~ . ° ~"~''°`+t _~ ' ' .~ • ~ ~ ~ EDITORIALS •~~ .~ , ~~~ H n ~~~: u kld s Q.~ •~, ~ . . . A :2~~ In times -rJ 0 1 ~~: :~~~'e•w Roanokers are zcnemplo~ed, but some u~o•rk in such low- ~;~hying jobs that they have trouble p•actting food an the table for 'heir families. A vibrant economg offers them little consolation. n~- THE PARADO.YES of the nation's overall prosperity continue to chal- lenge any community's tendency to- ward complacency -most recently ;ih a report indicating that the num- .b~er of Roanoke public-school stu- dents who qualify for free lunches, a ~~y measurement of poverty, has in- creased by 6 percent since 1995. ..~ ~. As School Board member Brian ~Vishneff obsen•ed, that doesn't bode well for raising academic achieve- rt~ent and test scores in city schools, ~i~ce Standards of Learning scores Piave shown a correlation between a•.. hest results and family income in 1'2oanoke and elsewhere in Virginia. v If the percentage of poor stu- dents keeps rising, even when unem- ployment is at a record low and 'we've got the best economy in 40 yeazs," Wishneff said, the conse- quences of that paradox could stymie the schools' best efforts to raise aphievement. ;Of even greater con- ,c:~rn is the health of the ~eazly 6,400 city school- c~aldren who aze eligible 4'•or~ the federal free-lunch program. Certainly, one gt7~~d nutritional meal on school days is better than none, but is it enough? i~Vhat about the days when tie schools are closed'.' What about other children in these same low-income families w•ho are not of school age? It is not just a Roanoke problem, of course. Although 48 percent of Roanoke's public-school students qualify for the free-lunch program, some other cities in Virginia, includ- ing Richmond, Danville and Norfolk, have even higher percentages of eli- gible students. So do some counties, including Buchanan, Dickenson and Lee in far Southwest Virginia. Clearly, the problem is not restricted only to Virginia. Through- out the nation, one out of every five children is categorized as poor, with as many as 34 percent of all the chil- dren in Mississippi in the clutches of poverty. A recent story in The Christian Science 1~Ionitor provides at least this hopeful news: After two decades dur- ing which America's lower-paid workers fell further behind the well- to-do, the go-go economg• is, finally, helping to close the gap. Wages of the working poor have recently increased more, as a per- centage, than for middle- and high-income workers. That trend, if it continues, may eventually ease the need for subsidized meal programs for poor children. • Would that it might also ease the nagging shame that the world's most prosperous nation - a nation seemingly growu;g more prosperous day by day -may be home to children who are going hungry-. YOUR CALL: What do you think about the issues raised in these editorials? To offer your opin- ion, please call 981-3109 or, out- side the Roanoke Valley, 1-800- 346-1234, exten- sion 109, and leave avoice-mail message. We'll publish a selection of responses. i ~ ~_ i4-QL.4'1.1 aam •x laaaoa 'pagspoo i, ' alolaq auiot; s,foq mo ; ~,. •~uaaa,~p' - a~i stuaas i~t;n+ ioi say - 8tnlt;~g uaaq an8q ,f, ,, ~ pisr3z tug I 'ua~ a.tE s; ,. ~ ~-a~tu o,N •quo; os pus 't ,uoc$tiaa 'iogq$tau ~?E suol;o~ at~stuo;~e~u~ p; ~qds soot;as; atp 'u18a1 c HORIZON 2 EDITORIALS t elr wa or n . to oVe In Increasing dependence on low-wage service-sector jobs. is oor. Virginia's regressive swelling the ranks of the working p all the more difficult. tai sgstem makes their strugg P1nom ,fstunoa mo u -xa ,cuEUZ amt VIRGL~II-~ has long been hailed as -nod anissaidas ,Sean 8 s. a "low-tax state," a distinction that '~fltjloouzs saq~zi ~u~ has served it well in luring new busi- -,Gana 'patn~tual aq api nesses and industries and in bolster- -l~y~ 3o alru p;uo1~atp , ing its economic prosperity in recent -ip;uoc~gu ~Sustu aaann aiaq years' 3o uoc1ipuoa aq1 pus Il 1B~ All the sadder that it remains in laquzauzas of uSnoua t that hall of shame with states whose a~~j ooh s ~ taxes fall disproportionately on the nts id ~ ' ono sdoo ~~ '~ . e poorest of res Indeed, as a recent study by the d Poli- . rofit Center on Budget an nonp cy Priorities found, Virginia a among ' x states that tax working si 317LLL;7ofLl _ hat even if who have so little money ome they would i 53119 'N WtJIll1AA ,. nc they doubled their still be officially classifie as poor. ' 'oE s govern- Is it the fault of Virginia a.cn~ulsi~ai atll ~fum iapuom . ment that many individuals are stuck •`~1ii1OO W~1 in low-wage jobs in the service sec- ;:_.. s,o.~10~~ o~ uant~ aq pjno jobs that often provide workers tor - -p'-`I qZS ;~utpnl'ut ~~~$O~` , far too little income to meet their ~uauzdolanap-anuouoaa u fainihes basic requirements for foo , ~a~pnq s,am~slst~al atut$a~ - housing, health care and child care? •uocmq •00 ~o~o ~o o u No. That's a national phe- . . eral Assembly has not regularly adjusted its income tax to keep up with economic raes otfficially defined e is that poverty, by the federal government, is now at an income level of $16,655 or less for two parents with two children. Virginia exempts less than half of that income from state taxes. The approved reduction in the sales tax on groceries, plus Gov. Jim Gi]more's much-ballyhooed "car-taY relief," plus modest tinkering with Virginia's Earned Income Tax Credit should put a little more change in the pockets of the commonwealth's lowest-paid workers. A new program that er-tends health-caoor families can children in working-p also alleviate some of their financial concerns. The state, though, needs to rec- ognize that people cannot always "work their way out of poverty" ~ --.--- this day and time, for all Z4 P 3 1 ots~~cp a sic P1os R11uaoai •00 On-10~~ nomenon, more related to YOUR CALL: What the economic prosperity federal nunimum-wage laws do you think about and nearly full employ- a.~n~I~ o~ p than t0 `'uguua's tax stucc- the issues raised merit, it's just nlt sod. b~anY OAjO~ ~IO~ ~.~0 axo:4-~o~r n3NHSna daveava •luauzu.~ano~ s,~uno~ a ut u11e1 al1lct a $ut.~o~sal ao3 ~~ of •~ads o1 patisi.~n ot{.ti~ ttazir a1 ~u-ua~lsil rilan~~ua~1a puE ~11ua sl3qucauc pJZ~~q pue `suazt~ta a~;: ~.e. ~ in these editorials. Virginians, emP oye Virginia lawmakers can argue that they've tried L To offer your opin- ion, please call time in minimum-wage jobs, are actually working a ,o to e~~e the tax burden on Just 981-3109 or, out- side the Roanoke their way into poverty. needs to eval- t lo~,c-ir:come residents. this ~~ear, for instance, they Valley, 1-800- 346-1234, eaten- e The sta irate its income-tax struc- appro~~ed a partial Phase- lion 109, and tore and ensure that it is out of the regressive sales leave avoice-mail ' not among the factors tax on food. ll message. We keeping "the working Eat unlike legislatures in publish a selection poor" poor. ;,~-.~ ~.~ites, Virginia's Gen- of responses. March 23, 1999 Good afternoon, Mr. Hodge, and members of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. I am Jim Ford, President of the Board of Directors of the Roanoke Symphony Society. I am pleased to be here this afternoon on behalf of musicians, staff, volunteers, and our audience, and perhaps most importantly the over 20,000 children we reach each year. We are grateful for the County of Roanoke's past financial support of our work. In 1998 our educational outreach programs allowed us to reach approximately 14,000 Roanoke County students of which 61 % were in elementary schools. Aristotle said, "Music has the power of producing a certain effect on the moral character of the soul, and if it has the power to do this, it is clear that the young must be directed to music and must be educated in it." Likely you have read in articles and books such as "The Mozart Effect" that educators are discovering that classical music can improve students' work in many areas of their scholastic life, including SAT scores. Our in-school ensembles provide young children with the exciting opportunity to observe and interact with professional musicians in a school setting. Filled with information and ready to have fun, each ensemble focuses attention on a specific family of instruments in the orchestra. Children are not only allowed, but also encouraged to ask questions and be involved in the educational process. They can see and touch the mysterious instruments that make the wonderful sounds. True enthusiasm is seen in a child's eye when he or she has the freedom to explore the exciting world of music. The open and enthusiastic style exhibited by the performing musicians and David Wiley, our music director, makes these programs successful. Maestro Wiley's enthusiasm for involving the children and young adults is contagious; it has spread to our musicians and even the children themselves. To make sure there is the best ensemble available we established the Educational Advisory Committee. This committee develops programs designed to fit the needs of the educational community. It consists of both teachers and supervisors from the academic population, along with musicians from the ensemble groups themselves and symphony board members. This committee assists in determining which Standards of Learning (SOL) will work best within the ensemble program, with specific focus on the K through 12 programs. The four core subjects of Math, History, English, and Science are all touched upon. Demonstrating this relationship between subjects and showing how they affect each other is one of the most valuable lessons which can be taught. We have received overwhelming praise from both teachers and students. With all the recent attention to the Standards of Learning requirements, it is no wonder this program has become even more important and timely. With the assistance of this Committee, our Education Director has developed a music education program which can be integrated into the regular classroom subjects. The Director decides what teaching methods will work best and match with the visiting ensemble and the respective SOL. Audio tapes and educational games and puzzles are created to involve the students in the learning process. The Director videotapes the performance and then reviews the P ensembles' interaction with those in the classroom. This review is used to critique and improve future performance and teaching methods. It is out of this constantly improving process and with the suggestions of the Advisory Committee, the In-School ensemble booklet was developed. It took more than three months to create, and is a forty-six page advisory and reference book for teachers. This removes the burden of class preparation from the teacher; in essence, everything needed for the ensemble class time is provided within this booklet. Two copies of this guide are provided free of charge to each school, and it may also be fully accessed via the Internet. We are leaving two for your review with the request they be returned when finished, as they are somewhat costly to prepare. Other outreach programs specifically targeted to reach young children are our "Adventures in Music" for children in grades 6-8 and "Discovery Concerts" geared toward grades 3 through 5. These concerts are held at the Roanoke Civic Center; admission is $1.50 per student and free for teachers. Educational materials are also available for these programs as well. "Nights at the Soundtable" is an educational program primarily for adults through age 100, though that can be extended. We would invite you to attend in a relaxed informal setting which enriches us. This is a free evening of music and refreshments enjoyed by approximately 80 primarily adult people and is held on the Wednesday prior to each of our Classics concerts. I have only mentioned a few of our outreach programs; however, I will leave for you some additional brochures regarding many of our other educational opportunities. As you may know, ticket sales cover only one-third of our costs. We receive support from individuals, corporations, private foundations, and public funds. Your support goes toward funding a part of our children's educational program. Roanoke County has been a faithful supporter of our work and we ask you to continue to support our programs and to consider increasing the level of financial support for next season. Thanks again. Your consideration is much appreciated. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 1999 RESOLUTION 032399-6 CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each member's knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting to which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Certification Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: /`~ Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Executive Session AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 1999 RESOLUTION 032399-7 CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each member's knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting to which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Certification Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Executive Session 1 ~ ~ ~ r p I N T E R MEMO O F F I C E Clerk to the Board To: Paul Mahoney, Terry Harrington, Arnold Covey, John W. Birckhead From: Mary H. Allen `'n-~'~-- Subj: Ordinance 032399-8, Springwood Associates Date: May 25, 1999 Attached is a REVISED copy of Ordinance 032399-8. County Attorney Paul Mahoney has advised me that the ordinance was prepared incorrectly prior to adoption. The ordinance should have listed the zoning classification as C-2 with Conditions rather than C-2. The proper zoning classification was listed in all other documents related to this rezoning request. Please replace any copies you have with the attached corrected copy. Thank you. P. S. to Paul Mahoney: Will you forward a copy of the corrected ordinance to John L. Walker, attorney for the Cave Spring Citizens Group? SEVT BY~WMC~D PHONE: (easy N3-I99I FAX: (EDP) Tf3~507 vORTfER'S EMAIL ADDRESS: jvalku®am~:cixom CRRrIF.R'S DIRECT DIAL: (if3~~ T8}~6463 May 24, 1959 I~X PAX AND F R G T CLAS ~ MA T~ Paul M. Mahoney, Esquire County Attorney County of Roanoke P.O. Box 29800 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, VA 24C18-0798 Re: Cave Spring Citizens Group, et ~1. v. Roanoke County Hoard of Supervisors Case No. CH 98-568 near Paul: 70° 772 2039: 2/ 3 oi:Flc~ IIV; R1CIiMOND WASHlNG'PON, D.C. NORTHERN VIliCiIMA LONDON !~'I'II.IATE OFFICES: DETROIT RIYADH II~il'4iRNE'I' ADDRESS< hap:!/va'w.*mcd.rnm During our most recent telephone conversation, you acknowledged r_hat Ordinance No. 032399-8, which was enacted on March 23, 1999 (thP ~~Ordinance~~;, erroneously stated that the property rezoned puz~suant thereto was zoned C-2 rather than C-2C immediately prior to the enactment of the Ordinance. You also informed me that, notwithstanding the error in the ordinance regarding the prior zoning classification ca£ the property, all of the related documents leading up to the enactment of the Ordinance, including the notices of public hearing issued by Roanoke County, corzectly stated that the property was zoned C-2C prior to the enactment of the Ordinance. Lastly, you informed me that, under certain circumstances,_yOur office will take administrative action to correct an obvious rnietake in an ordinance without the need for additional legislative action. Since our conversation, I have reviewed the documents that you forwarded to me under cover of your letter cf May 13, 1999, including the various notices. Having done ao, I request that ; ~-24-99 2 :1 ~FM 4~ f LL I:~MS&ML'LLE\~ . ~ , ~ILLIAMS IVI~JLLEN CHRISTIAPt ~L DOBBIAis ATTORNEYS do COUNSELORS AT LAVV A ['ROFESSIONAL c',c,RPORATTON T9v0 ]AMPS CCNTPA 1011 L~AS'T GARY STREE'T' r.o. Box IS20 R[CI-WOND, V:AGII~IIA 2}211-13z0 ~ SETT BY:~'MC&D 5-2~#-99 :_%:1'':i=49 ~[LLI~:'NS&ML11-E1-~ . ~ ~ r W ILLIAMS MULLEN - ~HRIS'TIAN ~L ~~BBINS AT'I~RNEY3 6C COUNSF1.CitS AT LAS Paul M. Mahoney, Esquire May 24, 1999 Page 2 70~ 7,2 2089:7 3/ the City take administrative action to correct the error in the Ordinance so that it reflects the true zoning v£ the property imme3iately prior to the enactment of the OrdinancQ (C-2C3 and is, therefore, consistent with the notices and other related documents that Roanoke County generated prior to and in connection with the enactment of the Ordinance. Such remedial administrative action would also make the Ordinance consistent with the Zoning Administrator's mernozandurn of March 28, 1999, as amended on May 7, 1999, confirming that the Home Depot Ordinance adopted on October 13, 1998 was void and of ro effect. Indeed, ur:der the foregoing circum.9tances, this is the ideal case for Roanoke County to take simple administrative action to re;~edy an obvious error. Once these matters have been taken care of, we can bring thi$ matter to a close. Please contact me if you have any questions. Thank you. Sincerely, :`~ ~~ I ~+w~_ ~U n L. Walker, IIi JLW,TII/dad ~ ~\~CDLIB\,70/lIM7~L\047161?.lf ~~~~.~ IN Revised 4/7/99 to correct Tax flap Numbers and I~agistprial District AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 1999 ORDINANCE 032399-8 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF APPROXIMATELY 10-ACRES OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED IN THE VICINITY OF BRAMBLETON AVENUE AND ELECTRIC ROAD (ALL OF TAX MAP NOS. 77.13-5-35; 77.13-5-39; 77.13-5-40.1; 77.13-5-43.1; 77.13- 5-43.2; 77.13-5-47; 77.13-5-48; 77.13-5-49; 77.13-5-50; 77.13-5-51) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-2 AND C-2 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2 WITH CONDITIONS AND GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO OPERATE FAST FOOD RESTAURANTS AND DRIVE-THRUS, UPON THE APPLICATION OF SPRINGWOOD ASSOCIATES LLC WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 23, 1999, and the second reading and public hearing were held March 23, 1999; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 2, 1999; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing approximately 10 acres, as described herein, and located in the vicinity of Brambleton Avenue and Electric Road (All of Tax Map Nos. 77.13-5-35; 77.13-5-39; 77.13-5-40.1; 77.13-5-43.1; 77.13-5-43.2; 77.13-5-47; 77.13-5-48; 77.13-5-49; 77.13-5-50; 77.13-5-51) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-2, Medium Density Residential District, and C-2, General Commercial District, to the 1 zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District with conditions. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Springwood Associates LLC. 3. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Springwood Associates LLC to operate fast food restaurants and drive-thrus to be located in the vicinity of Brambleton Avenue and Electric Road on three parcels designated as Site A, Site B, and Site C on the Conceptual Development Plan prepared by Shanks Associates, dated February 10, 1999, in the Cave Spring Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1999 Community Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.2-2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved. 4. That the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts: (1) The large parcel (5.26 acres) will be developed for general commercial use in either one parcel or may be divided into smaller parcels or a commercial condominium for conveyances and general commercial areas. (2) A buffer strip, as shown on the March 22, 1999 plan, shall be located along the property line adjoining the properties on Westmoreland Avenue. (3) No parking lot light pole shall exceed 22' above grade. (4) No off premises advertising signs shall be allowed on the property. (5) All retaining walls constructed on the property shall be constructed as split faced architectural block or equivalent. (6) The finished floor elevation of any building on the 5.26 acre parcel shall be no higher than 1150 feet. ,1 2 (7) The total square footage to be developed on the 5.26 acre parcel shall not exceed 50,000 square feet of commercial uses. (8) The following C-2 uses shall be prohibited on the 5.26 acre parcel: Home Occupation, Type I; Halfway House; Park and Ride Facility; Post Office; Public Parks and Recreational Areas; Bed and Breakfast; Boarding House; Commercial Outdoor Sports and Recreation; Gasoline Station; Kennel, Commercial; Pawn Shop; Recycling Centers and Stations; Amateur Radio Tower; Parking Facility. (9) The following uses permitted in C-2 with a Special Use Permit shall be prohibited on the 5.26 acre parcel: Automobile Repair Services, Major; Dance Hall; Manufactured Home Sales; Truck Stop; Landfill, Rubble; Transportation Terminal; Outdoor Gatherings; Restaurant, Drive-In and Fast Food. (10) The exterior of all buildings will be constructed of brick, drivit and/or masonry on all sides of buildings. All buildings will be finished to grade with said materials. (11) The property may be developed in substantial conformity with the conceptual development plan prepared by Shanks Associates dated March 22, 1999, attached hereto and made a part hereof. (12) The three parcels designated as Site A, Site B, and Site C on the plans prepared by Shanks Associates dated March 22, 1999, attached hereto, may be developed either for one, two or three fast food restaurants with traffic flow patterns in substantial accordance with the plans attached hereto if Special Use Permits are issued for the same, or should any or all of said sites not be used for fast food restaurants, those portions of the property may be used for any use permitted in a C-2 district other than those which are prohibited on the 5.26 acre parcel by the provisions of these proffers. 5. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: 3 BEGINNING at a point on the northerly side of Virginia Route 419, Electric Road, at the southwesterly corner of the Rite Aid property; thence leaving Route 419 and with the Rite Aid property and proceeding N. 01 deg. 50 sec. 26 min. W. 111.57 feet to a point; thence N. 13 deg. 23 sec. 34 min. E. 116.17 feet to a point; thence N. 82 deg. 29 min. 30 sec. E. 58.55 feet to a point; thence N. 11 deg. 40 min. 25 sec. E. 313.06 feet to a point; thence S. 76 deg. 56 min. 51 sec. E. 1.54 feet to a point; thence N. 23 deg. 09 min. 59 sec. E. 166.11 feet to a point; thence S. 74 deg. 21 min. 55 sec. E. 110.78 feet to a point; thence S. 59 deg. 35 min. 55 sec. E. 519.51 feet to a point; thence s. 38 deg. 31 min. 50 sec. W. 344.09 feet to a point; thence S. 53 deg. 23 min. 02 sec. E. 236.76 feet to a point; thence S. 64 deg. 49 min. 34 sec. W. 101.93 feet to a point; thence S. 55 deg. 31 min. 06 sec. E. 34.13 feet to a point; thence S. 20 deg. 06 min. 28 sec. W. 136.88 feet to a point; thence N. 79 deg. 03 min. 14 sec. W. 359.12 feet to a point; thence N. 64 deg. 54 min. 15 sec. W. 298.98 feet to the point of beginning. 6. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Jam. Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Terry Harrington, County Planner John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 4 ~' ~ ~ ~~ ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 1999 ORDINANCE 032399-8 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF APPROXIMATELY 10-ACRES OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED IN THE VICINITY OF BRAMBLETON AVENUE AND ELECTRIC ROAD (PART OF TAX MAP NOS. 77.13-5-35; 77.13-5-38; 77.13-5-39, 77.13-5-40; ALL OF TAX MAP NOS. 77.13-5-43.1; 77.13-5-43.2; 77.13-5-47; 77.13-5-48; 77.13- 5-49; 77.13-5-50; 77.13-5-51) IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-2 AND C-2 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2 WITH CONDITIONS AND GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO OPERATE FAST FOOD RESTAURANTS AND DRIVE-THRUS, UPON THE APPLICATION OF SPRINGWOOD ASSOCIATES LLC WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 23, 1999, and the second reading and public hearing were held March 23, 1999; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 2, 1999; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing approximately 10 acres, as described herein, and located in the vicinity of Brambleton Avenue and Electric Road (Part of Tax Map Nos. 77.13-5-35; 77.13-5-38; 77.13-5-39, 77.13-5-40; All of Tax Map Nos. 77.13-5-43.1; 77.13-5-43.2; 77.13-5-47; 77.13-5-48; 77.13-5-49; 77.13-5-50; 77.13-5-51) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-2, Medium Density Residential District, and C-2, General Commercial District, to the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial 1 ~' , District with conditions. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Springwood Associates LLC. 3. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Springwood Associates LLC to operate fast food restaurants and drive-thrus to be located in the vicinity of Brambleton Avenue and Electric Road on three parcels designated as Site A, Site B, and Site C on the Conceptual Development Plan prepared by Shanks Associates, dated February 10, 1999, in the Cave Spring Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1999 Community Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.2-2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved. 4. That the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts: (1) The large parcel (5.26 acres) will be developed for general commercial use in either one parcel or may be divided into smaller parcels or a commercial condominium for conveyances and general commercial areas. (2) A buffer strip, as shown on the March 22, 1999 plan, shall be located along the property line adjoining the properties on Westmoreland Avenue. (3) No parking lot light pole shall exceed 22' above grade. (4) No off premises advertising signs shall be allowed on the property. (5) All retaining walls constructed on the property shall be constructed as split faced architectural block or equivalent. (6) The finished floor elevation of any building on the 5.26 acre parcel shall be no higher than 1150 feet. 2 (7) The total square footage to be developed on the 5.26 acre parcel shall not exceed 50,000 square feet of commercial uses. (8) The following C-2 uses shall be prohibited on the 5.26 acre parcel: Home Occupation, Type I; Halfway House; Park and Ride Facility; Post Office; Public Parks and Recreational Areas; Bed and Breakfast; Boarding House; Commercial Outdoor Sports and Recreation; Gasoline Station; Kennel, Commercial; Pawn Shop; Recycling Centers and Stations; Amateur Radio Tower; Parking Facility. (9) The following uses permitted in C-2 with a Special Use Permit shall be prohibited on .the 5.26 acre parcel: Automobile Repair Services, Major; Dance Hall; Manufactured Home Sales; Truck Stop; Landfill, Rubble; Transportation Terminal; Outdoor Gatherings; Restaurant, Drive-In and Fast Food. (10) .The exterior of all buildings will be constructed of brick, drivit and/or masonry on all sides of buildings. All buildings will be finished to grade with said materials. (11) The property may be developed in substantial conformity with the conceptual development plan prepared by Shanks Associates dated March 22, 1999, attached hereto and made a part hereof. (12) The three parcels designated as Site A, Site B, and Site C on the plans prepared by Shanks Associates dated March 22, 1999, attached hereto, may be developed either for one, two or three fast food restaurants with traffic flow patterns in substantial accordance with the plans attached hereto if Special Use Permits are issued for the same, or should any or all of said sites not be used for fast food restaurants, those portions of the property may be used for any use permitted in a C-2 district other than those which are prohibited on the 5.26 acre parcel by the provisions of these proffers. 5. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: 3 BEGINNING at a point on the northerly side of Virginia Route 419, Electric Road, at the southwesterly corner of the Rite Aid property; thence leaving Route 419 and with the Rite Aid property and proceeding N. 01 deg. 50 sec. 26 min. W. 111.57 feet to a point; thence N. 13 deg. 23 sec. 34 min. E. 116.17 feet to a point; thence N. 82 deg. 29 min. 30 sec. E. 58.55 feet to a point; thence N. 11 deg. 40 min. 25 sec. E. 313.06 feet to a point; thence S. 76 deg. 56 min. 51 sec. E. 1.54 feet to a point; thence N. 23 deg. 09 min. 59 sec. E. 166.11 feet to a point; thence S. 74 deg. 21 min. 55 sec. E. 110.78 feet to a point; thence S. 59 deg. 35 min. 55 sec. E. 519.51 feet to a point; thence s. 38 deg. 31 min. 50 sec. W. 344.09 feet to a point; thence S. 53 deg. 23 min. 02 sec. E. 236.76 feet to a point; thence S. 64 deg. 49 min. 34 sec. W. 101.93 feet to a point; thence S. 55 deg. 31 min. 06 sec. E. 34.13 feet to a point; thence S. 20 deg. 06 min. 28 sec. W. 136.88 feet to a point; thence N. 79 deg. 03 min. 14 sec. W. 359.12 feet to a point; thence N. 64 deg. 54 min. 15 sec. W. 298.98 feet to the point of beginning. 6. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~. Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Terry Harrington, County Planner John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 4 S-1 ~o~~r~ ana.w KJ ua°~..m ra ar x~AraJx . ~ ~nm" .s..u J swan 7 een ~ "/ur 'Y aa'a . r J rut a x as.u >~ J -a-a J 1°r x m.u J~yU W w ur' f +ma Ii // ~ u. rP~~A tai ~ ~~~ ~~^ ~ r„~~+~" ~p~~ - ~. ~. Pall:: -r,~. ~ -grlx ~. _..,.. ~ ! v -'-' O~ J ~? ,~ .,~ H Q ^~3= //J~~~ ~ ~ 1ri 4 5F 7F :~ ....... Y.~ ~7 a ~ ~ ~ r Off?, """ x - ` ~ s F'`rs M ~F<~C~fC ~~ _, 1 '~ ~a~ b ~ ~ ~ ~.~ rS'i~. f„~K. O ` / e R eii' F a- ~ wr v x ~'iu "9~0 ~F, lt~~' - un n ~ r mss' Q ~J ~ '~'' ~r ~ - .,. ~r a mv:-n-.a ~a wr u rv jn.i: m.r~ t0r t~ _N x P1.rtS-M x IrfA-a-al j(~~ 1 1 ~~ nI Tn.~i lY ~2 -~ rv ~T.U n rur L {1 -~ r Y~~ h. ~ ~~ h .,~.. L P•.u-l-a x my-s-a n ,rn~a-a->. 15~~ ~s~~~~C~Y^ Sew VA. FtOUTF 479 (E~£C7RIC ROAD) ~~~1~TO~YE' Cfltll~l~'Y' ~S'~rirag-wood Asso~irxt~s, ~.~.C. IF~`P.A.RT&fENT t~F PRflPflSF.1JJ PE'~ON~1Vfl F~fl.~ C~1~~LTNITY D.~'V~'La.~'~f~1~I?' .~'-2 A1VD £`-2~ TD C-2c ~ S}aec~;a,d Use Perrrtit ~ Revised 4-/7/99 to correct Tax Map Numbers and Magisterial District Revised 5/25/99 to correct C-2 Zoning to C-2 with conditions AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 1999 ORDINANCE 032399-8 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF APPROXIMATELY 10-ACRES OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED IN THE VICINITY OF BRAMBLETON AVENUE AND ELECTRIC ROAD (ALL OF TAX MAP NOS. 77.13-5-35; 77.13-5-39; 77.13-5-40.1; 77.13-5-43.1; 77.13- 5-43.2; 77.13-5-47; 77.13-5-48; 77.13-5-49; 77.13-5-50; 77.13-5-51) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-2 AND C-2 WITH CONDITIONS TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2 WITH CONDITIONS AND GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO OPERATE FAST FOOD RESTAURANTS AND DRIVE-THRUS, UPON THE APPLICATION OF SPRINGWOOD ASSOCIATES LLC WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 23, 1999, and the second reading and public hearing were held March 23, 1999; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 2, 1999; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing approximately 10 acres, as described herein, and located in the vicinity of Brambleton Avenue and Electric Road (All of Tax Map Nos. 77.13-5-35; 77.13-5-39; 77.13-5-40.1; 77.13-5-43.1; 77.13-5-43.2; 77.13-5-47; 77.13-5-48; 77.13-5-49; 77.13-5-50; 77.13-5-51) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-2, Medium Density Residential District, and C-2, General Commercial District with 1 conditions, to the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District with conditions. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Springwood Associates LLC. 3. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Springwood Associates LLC to operate fast food restaurants and drive-thrus to be located in the vicinity of Brambleton Avenue and Electric Road on three parcels designated as Site A, Site B, and Site C on the Conceptual Development Plan prepared by Shanks Associates, dated February 10, 1999, in the Cave Spring Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1999 Community Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.2-2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved. 4. That the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts: (1) The large parcel (5.26 acres) will be developed for general commercial use in either one parcel or may be divided into smaller parcels or a commercial condominium for conveyances and general commercial areas. (2) A buffer strip, as shown on the March 22, 1999 plan, shall be located along the property line adjoining the properties on Westmoreland Avenue. (3) No parking lot light pole shall exceed 22' above grade. (4) No off premises advertising signs shall be allowed on the property. (5) All retaining walls constructed on the property shall be constructed as split faced architectural block or equivalent. (6) The finished floor elevation of any building on the 5.26 acre parcel shall be no higher than 1150 feet. (7) The total square footage to be developed on the 5.26 acre parcel 2 shall not exceed 50,000 square feet of commercial uses. (8) The following C-2 uses shall be prohibited on the 5.26 acre parcel: Home Occupation, Type I; Halfway House; Park and Ride Facility; Post Office; Public Parks and Recreational Areas; Bed and Breakfast; Boarding House; Commercial Outdoor Sports and Recreation; Gasoline Station; Kennel, Commercial; Pawn Shop; Recycling Centers and Stations; Amateur Radio Tower; Parking Facility. (9) The following uses permitted in C-2 with a Special Use Permit shall be prohibited on the 5.26 acre parcel: Automobile Repair Services, Major; Dance Hall; Manufactured Home Sales; Truck Stop; Landfill, Rubble; Transportation Terminal; Outdoor Gatherings; Restaurant, Drive-In and Fast Food. (10) The exterior of all buildings will be constructed of brick, drivit and/or masonry on all sides of buildings. All buildings will be finished to grade with said materials. (11) The property may be developed in substantial conformity with the conceptual development plan prepared by Shanks Associates dated March 22, 1999, attached hereto and made a part hereof. (12) The three parcels designated as Site A, Site B, and Site C on the plans prepared by Shanks Associates dated March 22, 1999, attached hereto, may be developed either for one, two or three fast food restaurants with traffic flow patterns in substantial accordance with the plans attached hereto if Special Use Permits are issued for the same, or should any or all of said sites not be used for fast food restaurants, those portions of the property may be used for any use permitted in a C-2 district other than those which are prohibited on the 5.26 acre parcel by the provisions of these proffers. 5. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the northerly side of Virginia Route 419, Electric Road, at the southwesterly corner of the Rite Aid property; thence leaving Route 419 and 3 with the Rite Aid property and proceeding N. 01 deg. 50 sec. 26 min. W. 111.57 feet to a point; thence N. 13 deg. 23 sec. 34 min. E. 116.17 feet to a point; thence N. 82 deg. 29 min. 30 sec. E. 58.55 feet to a point; thence N. 11 deg. 40 min. 25 sec. E. 313.06 feet to a point; thence S. 76 deg. 56 min. 51 sec. E. 1.54 feet to a point; thence N. 23 deg. 09 min. 59 sec. E. 166.11 feet to a point; thence S. 74 deg. 21 min. 55 sec. E. 110.78 feet to a point; thence S. 59 deg. 35 min. 55 sec. E. 519.51 feet to a point; thence s. 38 deg. 31 min. 50 sec. W. 344.09 feet to a point; thence S. 53 deg. 23 min. 02 sec. E. 236.76 feet to a point; thence S. 64 deg. 49 min. 34 sec. W. 101.93 feet to a point; thence S. 55 deg. 31 min. 06 sec. E. 34.13 feet to a point; thence S. 20 deg. 06 min. 28 sec. W. 136.88 feet to a point; thence N. 79 deg. 03 min. 14 sec. W. 359.12 feet to a point; thence N. 64 deg. 54 min. 15 sec. W. 298.98 feet to the point of beginning. 6. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: YJ'Ca-~....~-~. Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Terry Harrington, County Planner John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 4 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 23, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: Second reading of an ordinance to rezone approximately 10 acres from R-2 and C-2 conditional to C-2 conditional for retail sales and obtain a Special Use Permit for fast food restaurants and drive-thrus, located in the vicinity of Brambleton Avenue (Route 221) and Electric Road (Route 419), Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Springwood Associates COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Recommend approval of Springwood Associates' request for rezoning and Special Use Permit for those parcels along 419 with acceptable proffers. These parcels were rezoned several months ago with essentially the same proffers as are being offered at this time. This request is not unlike rezonings we do ourselves when we prepare sites for development in advance of having a specific prospect. We protect neighboring citizens and businesses with proffered conditions which should be done with this request as well. I can support rezoning of the upper portion with strong proffers to protect neighboring residents and businesses but I would prefer to wait until more is known about the use of the property and how it will be graded. s-~ PETITIONER: SPRINGWOOD ASSOCI'ATES' CASE NUMBER: 11-3/99 Planning Commission Hearing Date: March 2, 1999 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: March 23, 1999 A. REQUEST Petition of Springwood Associates LLC, to rezone approximately 10 acres from R-2 and C-2 conditional to C-2 conditional for retail sales and obtain a Special Use Permit for fast food restaurants and drive-thrus, located in the vicinity of Brambleton Avenue (Route 221) and Electric Road (Route 419), Cave Spring Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS Suzanne Seth, William Beane, Lauri Peery, Patricia Meador voiced the following concerns: unknown uses, right-of-way presently used by adjacent residents on Hidden Lane, a 6-foot high fence will not buffer adjoining residential property, declining property values, increased traffic, littering from fast food restaurants, too many unanswered questions, applicants are rushing this request through with too many unknowns, elevations of buildings were not known at community meeting, the residents have a right to know what is going to be built, how it will impact their neighborhood. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Commission asked if specific fast food restaurants have committed to the project. Applicant responded no. The Commission expressed concern, particularly with the Special Use request, that they did not have the information (scale, design, traffic circulation) they need to determine if the impacts of the requested uses are compatible with existing and future uses. Applicant responded that site plan review will address these items. Ms. Hooker expressed concern that allowing site plan review to address these issues would essentially bypass the Planning Commission process. The Planning Commission would be forgoing all input and letting staff do it. Mr. Witt said that approval of this would set a bad precedent; the whole purpose is to judge the impacts. Ms. Hooker commented that at least with the Home Depot request the Planning Commission knew what questions to ask; in this case we don't have enough information to know what questions to ask. Mr. Robinson agreed with Mr. Witt's comments. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS 1. The property will be developed in substantial conformity with the Conceptual Development Plan prepared by Shanks Associates, dated February 10, 1999, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. The large parcel (5.26 acres) will be developed for general commercial use in either one (1) parcel or may be divided into smaller parcels or a commercial condominium for conveyances and general commercial areas. 3. The three (3) parcels designated as Site A, Site B and Site C are to be granted Special Use Permits for drive through facilities for permitted uses including, but not limited to, fast food restaurants. 4. A buffer strip, as shown on the above plan, shall be located along the property line adjoining the properties on Westmoreland Avenue. T ~ ~...~, ~~~.~..JJJ~~ 5. No parking lot light pole shall exceed 22' above grade. 6. No off premises advertising signs shall be allowed on the property other than for the uses within the zoned property. 7. All retaining walls constructed on the property shall be constructed as split faced architectural block or equivalent. 8. The finished floor elevation of any building on the 5.26 acre parcel shall be no higher than 1150 feet. 9. The total square footage to be developed on the 5.26 acre parcel shall not exceed 70,000 square feet of commercial uses. 10.The following C-2 uses shall be prohibited on the 5.26 acre parcel: Home Occupation, Type I; Halfway House; Park and Ride Facility; Post Office; Public Parks and Recreational Areas; Bed and Breakfast; Boarding House; Commercial Outdoor Sports and Recreation; Gasoline Station; Kennel, Commercial; Pawn Shop Recycling Centers and Stations; Amateur Radio Tower; Parking Facility. 11. The following uses permitted in C-2 with a Special Use Permit shall be prohibited on the 5.26 acre parcel: Automobile Repair Services, Major; Dance Hall; Manufactured Home Sales; Truck Stop; Landfill, Rubble; Transportation Terminal; Outdoor Gatherings; Restaurant, Drive-In and Fast Food. Proffer #6 violates the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance and can not be accepted. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Witt commented that other sites along Rt. 419 and Route 221 that have been rezoned had site plans; this one doesn't tell me a whole lot; we don't have the information. This is a commercial use in a very intense area. He moved to recommend denial of the petition with proffered conditions. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Thomason, Witt, Robinson, Hooker NAYS: None ABSENT: Ross Mr. Witt moved to recommend denial of the special use permit saying that impacts are unknown, does not agree with giving a blank check for a special use permit request. This would set a poor precedent by approving it. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Thomason, Witt, Robinson, Hooker NAYS: None ABSENT: Ross F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity PJlap _ Staff Report _ Other Terrance Har ' gton, S ary Roanoke C unty Planning Commission ~~"~~~= RPPt~RT Case iVumber: 11-3lcaca Prepared by: Janet Scheid applicant: Springwood associates, LLC late: March 2, 1999 ~ T I E~~~T~1~~ ~~M~1A~~ The petitioners rezoning and Special Use Permit request does not provide enough site design specific information to properly evaluate this request for land .use and community impacts. The proposed uses of this property are not known at this time and petitioners have indicated that the property may be subdivided into multiple uses or developed for a single use. ~. L~E~+C~CIP~';~t~ ~F iPIC7'il~"iC~i~ Petitioners are requesting to rezone this property from R-~ and C-2 conditional to C-2 conditional and are requesting a Special Use Permit, for up to three fast food restaurants with drive-ins. Spring~~vood associates have submitted a conceptual development plan dividing this approximately 10 acre parse! into five lots. The existing Springwood Park shopping center is on one lot. Three other lots, approximately one acre each, have been proposed along the Rt. 419 frontage. The building that contains lVlc~ade Travel is on one of these lots and, under the proposal, would be removed. a L~- acre lot has been proposed towards the rear of the property adjoining the residential lots on V~estmoreland Urive. This application has been submitted by Springwood associates, t_LC as fee simple owners and contract purchasers of this property. There is an on-going contract dispute on one of the parcels of land that make up this petition. This property is located near the proposed new entrance from Rt. 419. This dispute will be resolved through the court system. If the contract dispute is not resolved in favor of the petitioners then any rezoning action and proffers the Planning Commission may recommend and the Board may take action on would not be valid. C. ~PP~.i'C~.~L~ RE~~L~T~~f~~ The property is currently zoned R-2 Residential which allows a variety of residential uses and C-~ conditional which allows a variety of commercial/retail uses. The conditions currently on the property were part 1 • ~-- of the 198 rezoning for the Springwood Park shopping canter and primarily deal with site specifications such as drainage, buffering and the right-of-way easement for adjoining property owners. ~. °l-he petitioners are requesting the property be zoned ~-~, Commercial with conditions and a Special Use Permit to allow up to three fast food restaurants with driveans on three parcels. 3. Site plan review is required. 4. ~'®®~' approval of all public roads is required. 2 S-I PART I! A~AL~SiS OP ~rl~Ti~~ 00~®iTi0~9~ 1. Lot Area -The site is approximately 1 g acres. It is bordered on the west by an existing Rite-Aid store zoned G-~. To the north and east are existing residential properties zoned R-1 and R-2. To the south the site fronts on Rt. 419. ~. Location -The site is located near Gave Spring Corner and the intersection ofi Rt. 419 and Brambleton Avenue. 3. Buildings/Structures -The property is currently the site ofi Springwood shopping center including the separate building housing McDade Travel. There are four other structures on this property. Three of them are old, vacant residential structures. The fourth is an occupied house that the petitioners own and are leasing. The remainder ofi the property is vacant. A portion of this property is used as access easement to adjoining residential properties on bidden Lane. 4. Access -Access to this site is currently from Rt. 419 east of the Springwood Park shopping center. At this location there is a cross-over on Rt. 419 so the site can be accessed traveling either east or west on Rt. 419. ~. Existing Tooocaraohy -The site slopes steeply uptivard starting behind the uppe~° level of Springwood shopping center. From the existing entrance to Springwood shopping center to the top of the hill on the wooded 5~- acre lot shown on the conceptual development plan is a difference in elevation of approximately 50 feet. ~. ~a~L~S1S ~P P'ROiP{~~E~ ~3~~"~LOPi~E~1T 1. Prooosed Use -Petitioner's are requesting a Special Use Permit for up to three fast food restaurants with drive-ins, for the three one acre lots on the conceptual development plan. No specific site design information, such as size and location of buildings, architecture, parking, traffic circulation or location and configuration of drive-in windows has been provided on these 3 fast food restaurants. Section 30-19 Special Use Permits of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance specifiically requires that this level ofi information be provided when a Special Use Permit is requested so that staff can adequately evaluate the land use impacts of the requested use. This section states that, "This category of uses known as special uses is established in recognition that in addition to uses permitted by right, certain uses may, depending yap®n their scale, design, i®cati®n, grad conditions 3 7 ~ s~ i~pc~se~ b~ the Etoard, ~~ cotvipat0ibie wii#~ e~sst~r~g anc3 ~a~$a~re uses 9n a ~istr~ct". This section further states that the proposal for a special use permit, "shall have a minimum adverse impact on the surrounding neighborhood or community. !n considering impacts, due regard shelf be given to the tiir~ir~g ofi the operat°s®n, Mite des~gra, access, scree~ar~g or other utters whioh right be r~g~ia#ed to ~aiitiigate adverse ~r~pact. ~Jithout this information staff can not adequately evaluate the proposal for land use impacts or analyze how the three sites will. relate to each other. Staff has indicated this to the applicants who have decided to proceed with the application as submitted. fVo specific use has been indicated for the 5+ acre site. Petitioners have proffered out a list ofi uses that will not be allowed on this site and have proffered that a maximum of 70,000 square feet will be developed on this 5+ acre site. They have also proffered that this site will be developed as either one parcel or may be divided into smaller parcels. Again, without site specific information staff can not adequately evaluate this proposal. Although the conceptual plan shows this entire site divided into separate smaller parcels the petitioners have stated that they may not subdivide the property but instead develop the property as one site, for one use. Although they have limited the total square footage on the 5+ acre area to 70,000 square fleet they have not proffered an overall maximum square footage on the entire site. ~lypotheticaily, with the removal of the existing Springwood Park shopping center, a large retail facility of 100,000+ square feet could be developed on this 10-g- sore site. Final Topograohv -The 5+ acre site will need extensive grading regardless of the specifiic use that develops there. Petitioners have indicated that the site will be graded to elevation 11 ~0 -approximately 30 feet below existing topography. Although several cross-sections have .been prepared, they are not adequate to indicate how the property will be graded. Detaining walls will be required along the western side of the property. Based on experienci/ with the development of the ftite- Aid site, blasting may be required on this site. 2. Access to Site -The proffered conceptual plan proposes access to this site at two locations. The primary access would be at a new intersection with Dt. 419 approximately 900 fleet east of Brambieton Avenue. Secondary access would be a right-in/right-out access at the existing driveway for the Springwood Park development. There is no access to this site from either Brambieton Avenue or Westmoreland Drive. ~.. ~, . ~ ~ s- + if Q new cross-over on Rt. ~~ 9 is approved then V®®T would close the existing cross-over for safety reasons. Although there have been discussions of a new traffic signal at the location of the proposed access, staff has bean informed that there is not a high probability that this will be justified. The traffic study that has been conducted will be evaluated by V~~T and a final determination made concerning a new traffic signal. 3. ~ircuiation -The conceptual development plan shows the two access points discussed above connected with a frontage road that will serve the 3 fast food restaurants. The driveway that currently serves the upper level of Springwood shopping center will be extended to provide access to the 5-~ acre site at the top of the hill No information has been provided on internal circulation or on whether these roads will be built to public road standards. ~. Traffic Count - A traffic study has been conducted by Vanasse Nangen Brustlin, inc. a transportation consulting firm in Fredricksburg, Virginia. They have conducted this study at the request of the petitioners. They analyzed trip generation to the proposed site, assuming 3 fast food restaurants with drive-ins are built along with 60,000 square feet (as opposed to the proffered maximum of 70,000 square fleet) of retail/commercial space. Their result show that approximately 420 additional trips will be generated to this site in the morning peak hour and approximately 460 additional trips in the evening peak hour. These results do not reflect pass-by trips. The study cites lTE (Institute of Traffic Engineers) data that shows that on average 45 to 47 percent of the traffic generated by the fast food restaurants will be pass-by traffic. Although V~C~T policy only allows a maximum ofi 1 v percent reduction in the overall trip rate for pass-by traffic the consulting firm recalculated the results using the 45 to 4.7 percent reduction.- .These results are as follows: 245 new trips generated in the morning and 350 rew trips generated in the evening. 5. Public Services - Public water and szwer services are available to this site. 6. Si na e -With approximately 1000. feet of frontage on Kt. 41.9 petitioners will be allowed approximately 1500 square feet of signage on the site. If the site is subdivic#ed into separate parcels of land signage for the rear 5+ acres will not be allowed on the front parcels because it would be considered off-site signage. 7. Community Meeting -Community meetings were held on February 10 and 15 at the Brambleton Center. Issues of concern discussed at the meetings included: 1) hours of operation; 2) hours of construction; 3) access to Hidden Lane; 4) noise concerns with dumpsters, etc.; 5) blasting and impacts on surrounding residential structures; 6) height of retaining wails and visual impacts on nearby houses; and 7) litter associated with the fast food restaurants. 8. Petitioners have proffered the following: 5 ~- The property will be developed in substantial conformity with the Conceptual ®svelopment Plan prepared by Shanks Associates, dated Februar`~ 10, 1999, attached hereto and made a part hereof. ~. The large parcel (5.26 acres} will be dejaelopsd for general commercial use in either one (1) parse! or may bs divided into smaller parcels or a commercial condominium for conveyances and general commercial areas. 3. The three (3) parcels designated as Site A, Sits B and Site C are to bs granted Special ~9se Permits fior drive through facilities for permitted uses including, but not limited to, fast food restaurants. ~. A buffer strip, as shown on the above plan, shall be located along the property line adjoining the properties on Westmoreland Avenue. ~. ~!o parking lot light pole shal exceed 22° above grade. 6. Flo off premises advertising signs shall be allowed on the property other than for the uses within the zoned property. 7. All retaining walls constructed on the property shall be constructed as split faced architectural block or equivalent. 6. The finished floor elevation of any building on the 5.26 acre parcel shall be no higher than 1150 feet. ®. The total square footage to be developed on the 5..26 acre parcel shall not exceed 70,006 square feet ofi commercial uses. 1®. The following C-2 :uses shall be prohibited on the 5.26 acre parcel: Home Occupation, Type l Halfway House Park and Ride Facility Post Office Public Parks and Recreational Areas Bed and Breakfast Boarding House Commercial Outdoor Sports and Recreation Gasoline Station Kennel, Commercial. Pawn Shop Recycling Centers and Stations Amateur Radio Tower 6 i Parking Facility ~ ~~ 11. The fiollowing uses permitted in C-~ with a Special Use Permit shall be prohibited on the 5.26 acrd parcel: Automobile Repair Services, Mayor ®ance Hall Manufactured Flome Sales Truck Stop Landfill, Rubble Transportation Terminal Outdoor Gatherings Restaurant, give-9n and Fast Food 9. Anaiysis of Proffered Conditions - in general, the uses that the petitioners have proffered out are of little value. For the most part, they are uses that one could reasonably assume would not locate on this site anyway for various reasons ranging from lack of marketability, location of the site and profitability given the cost of the land and site development costs. Proffer number 11 which proffers out uses that require a Special Use Permit on the 5+ acre site is of minimal value since petitioners are not requesting a Special Use Permit for that portion of the site anyway. Proffer number 3 should be re-aNOrded to clarify that petitioners are requesting a Special Use Permit specifically for fast food restaurants with drive-ins n®t "fior per~iittest uses inc~udiing, but not tirrait€~d t®, fast fo®d restaurants." Proffer number 6 should be re-worded to state, "No off-premises advertising signs shall be allowed on the property," As this proffer is currently worded petitioners could subdivide the property and put advertising signs for the 5+ acre parcel on the front parcels. This proffer is unacceptable because it would violate the zoning ordinance. O. COfVF{~RMA~ICE V-IITH OOUN3Y COMPREHiE~dSiVE PLAiV This site is designated Core in the Roanoke County Community Plan. This designation is reserved for areas .where high intensity urban development is encouraged. -The existing land use pattern, current zoning, site access, orien#ation of the site, close proximity to population canters and availability of urban services are all factors which make Core the appropriate designation for this site. The petitioners request is to change the conditions on the currently zoned C-2 property and to request a Special Use Permit for a portion of the property. This request is consistent-with the Core fond use designation. sSI Staff reviewed this development proposai against the Core design guidelines contained in the l~oanoke County Community Plan. The proposal does provide site-to-site movement for vehicles and minimizes new driveways along lit. 41 g, a primary road. !t is impossible to evaluate the development proposai against the other guidelines recommended in the Plan due to the lack of specific design information provided on this proposai. Guidelines dealing with bullding Size, shape, height and materials; natural site amenities; and exterior lighting and signs can not be evaluated due to lack of information provided by the petitioners. F'~~~ ~!I ST~PP CGR1CLt9~i~I~S Petitioners have filled an application with minimum, and to some extent, less then minimum information required. They are seeking maximurn flexibility to market and develop this site which is obviously in their best interests. It is not in the best interests of the community because without adequate site design information staff, Planning Commission and ultimately the Board of Supervisors can not evaluate the land use impacts of this proposai. Petitioners have stated that #hey may develop the site far one use or they may subdivide the property and develop multiple uses on this site. Staff can attempt to evaluate the land use impacts assuming fast food restaurants are developed but they may not be. Consequently, the frontage road and lots shown on the conceptual development plan may or may not ever be developed. The traffic study that has been conducted has, as its basis, a set of assumptions about the uses of this property (i.e,, 3 fast food restaurants and 68,000 sq. ft. of commercial space) tf~at~ may in fac# be totally different then what is actually developed. To staff's. knowiledge the l~oanoke County Planning Commission has never approved a Special 19x2 Permit for a fast food restaurant without rriinimum site design information such as foot print of the building, building architecture, focatiori of drive-in window and speakers, dumpster locations, traffic circulation, parking, drive thru aisles and queuing spaces, screening, buffering and signage: Staff recommends denial ofi this petition.. P~tEP~REi3 18°x: JANE' SC~E3® ~31A~'~ iPFC;E~,~RE~; .February 25, ~ 999 8 GOU~ITY O.~ RCAi~OKE , DEPT. OF PL~,N'~d~l~:'~G"~.ND ZONING 5204 Bernard Dr.' P.O. Box 29860 Roanoke, VA 2~C18 ( 540` 772-2068 FAX f5''0 1 7 T ?-2 + Oo For scarf use only date, r~ Giyree~~9'~,~~ received appy~ io~=ti,~y ~' ~~"," -PCiEZ=w da.e }~ jplacards issued: ,oCS data: ~ Casa PJum6er: - ;~_.... ~`~' ~~r~ ,. .. a;:i~i;:i ::: ..::::: .:..::::::r:..::.:::: ;.::....:.:. , .. ,. ..,::..:.:::. Check type cf application filed (check a(l that apphf): REZO~lING ~ Sr ECIAL USE CIVARIANCE A.pplicant's name: Springwood Associates, L.L.C. Phone: 774-6500 Address: 3214 Electric Road, SW, Suite 200, Roanoke Zip Code: 24018 Contact: Edward A. Natt, Esq., 1919 Electric Road, SW, Suite 1, Roanoke, VA 24018 774 Owner's Warne: Springwood Associates, L.L.C.- FEE SIt~.Pi.E 0~1Eit & Fhene:774-6500 3214 Electric Road, SW, Suite 200, CONTRACT PURCHASES Z, 24018 Addr ss 4t o~ ~ e Roanoke, : Roanoke Contact: Edward A. Natt, Esq,, 1919 Electric Road, Su e e "'24018 774-1197 Location of property: Tax Map Number: SEE ATTACHED Vicinity of Brambleton Avenue ~~iagisteriai District: Cave Spring (Rt. 221) and Electric Road (Rt. 419) Community Planning Area: Cave S rin ~ P g Size of parcel (s): Existing Zoning: R-2 and C-2C 10 +/- acres Existing Land Use: Residential, commercial and vacant sq.ft. PrOp058d Zoning: C-_7 ~, ~n Stay'' Us= Onr"y I Proposed Land Use: Retail and fast food restaurant use Type: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES X NO (F NC, A V?.R(:`-.NCE fS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES X NC ~, IF NO, A, VA,R!A.,NCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. ~ If rezoning request, are conditions being prof ~ e'=d with this request? YES NO . ... ~;~ ~~~ : ~~ .~ ~~~' :.~: :. ... .......t~~ ....... ...:.:..::.:................ .... :...... Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NGT BE ACCEPTED IF A~tiY GF T}-iESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETi E. -1: A' RIS V R73 V R!5 4 X Consultation X 8 1 /2" x l i" concept plan X Application fes X I Application X ~`~ Metes and bounds descripticn ~~%-~< Proffers, if applicable X I Justification ~~~~ Water and sewer application Y ( Adjoining properly owners I hereby certify t,':at ! am e:'thzr the owner of the property or the ov~mer's agent or conrract purc;~aser and am acting with the knowledge and co{~ns2.ot or the owner. Owner's Signature : ~~~n.~+. t~ ~ , _ ~'~, _ ~ '`J ~..-~,.~.~w.,~.a,~ ~~~~-..'~ ~ ~-Iw- t , FO( Start` Use Only: Case Vumber .n.,, . a,: ..:: '. n::... ~, ::....: ..':::::.. ':::':~ . ...... t-,-~ 2Y". 1. 1~1 ~: :. .:~~. ~L ~1+~12 t. Y:~ .~~.:~~:~~~:-'~~+L'.::'.Sc„tu~'"7~~~~i'l ~~i~~~~~~~~~::.._.: ..':: ...: ... :'~:'.:~.': :... .:...:.... Applicant Springwood Associates, L,L,C. The Planning Commission vviil study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public healtin, safe*.y, and general welfare. Please ans~rver the fclle~r~ing questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request fathers the purposes cf the Zoning Ordinance {Section 30-3i as well as the purpose found at the beginning or the applicable zoning district c!assificatior, in the zoning ordinance. This rezoning request furthers the purposes of.the zoning ordinance by creating a location ' for new commercial retail and service uses that serve the needs of the citizens in Southwest County. The area is identified as Core by the 1985 Comprehensive Plan and is adjacent to Route 419 and US Route 221 (Brambleton Avenue). ~, it I Pease explain hQVJ the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. i The following general guidelines and policies in the Comprehensive Plan are met: ! Po1ic C-1 Encoura?e the develo went of intensive, mixed-use urban development in Y b P designated Core areas Policy C-2 Serve each Core area by an arterial or higher grade street Policy C-4 Coordinate the design of commercial sites with regards to on-site vehicular movement, access, building characteristics, signage and site amenities Please describe the impact{s; of the request on the propery itself, the adjoining properies, and the surrounding ~ area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including Water/sealer, roads, schools, parrs/recreation, and fire/rescue. The rezoning request seeks to create a suitable location for ne~a business development as specified in Objective 3 in the Roanoke County Economic Development Strategy (April 1998) Business Attraction Program Strategy- "Identify potential commercial and industrial sites and work with the property owner, community and County staff to have the property rezoned for an appropriate commercial or industrial use." . ~+ PR.OFF ~r~S 1. T'^,e propert~t w:._1 be de-relcped i_1 su'csL~.~.t_~_ con_or-n~-=Y W~_=~1 tfle Conce~taal DEVeiC~ment Plan ~Gr2parcd by ~_~a n1{S AS,SGC1aLcS r C~a~ed L'~iebr'..1dr;T 10, iy`.~~, attaCl7ed ilcr_=0 ana made a pcirL riercOf , 2. The large parcel (5.25 acres) will be developed for general CCmmerClal uSe ?n e7the= oT'ie ~.l pa"=Cel Cr TTla`I be dl'T-ded 1s c a coma ~ '~ ~ c~ndomi n' um. fo con-.reyance~ into sma=ler parce -r ~ er_=..~_ ~- -~ ~ r and general cornmercia_ areas . 3. The three (3) parcels des-anated as Site A, Site B and Sit2 C arc tC be granted SpeC~ al USe Perms is fCr dr1~Te trlrOUgli faC111t1eS fOr permitted uSeS 1nC~1'.ld1nG, bUt nOt 1lmiteu tC, faSL. food restaurants. r 4. A buffer strip, as s:~.Own on the abo~re plan, shall be located along the property 1_ne adjoining t=~e properties cn Westmoreland P_venue. 5. No pa"~king let light pole shall exceed 22' above grade. o . I~io off premises adve rti.=ina s"~gris s~_all be allcwe~? cr_~ the property other ti7an for the uses wi=h~.n the zoned property. 7. P._1 reta_nincr wall_ const~ucced on the property- shat= be Constr'~.Ct~d a5 S~_~ L Laced arC!7=t`.Ctura_ ~J~ OCK ~~ e~Ui Vale:'L . 8. Tree finished flecr elevati cn cf an~% bu,'_ldi_~u on the 5.26 acre parcel shall be r~o higher than 1150 f°et. a . ~'.7e tOtai S~uar ~OvLaCe tO be ue~Te_O~ea v^n i.'1"le S , 25 aCr= parcel SYlall not eXC°°~ 70, QOiJ S _uar2 f2et CL yCCTTimerClal uSeS . i0. The following C-2 uses shai.l be proi7ibi_ed on ~he 5.26- aCrc parcel: Home Cccupaticn, Type I Halfway House Park and Ride Facii_=~•r Post Gffice Public Parks and Recreational Areas Bed and Breaisfast Bearding House Commercial Outdoor Sports and Recreation Gasoline Station Kennel, Commercial Pawr_ Shop Recycling Centers and Sta=ior_s Amateur Radio Tower Par'~c',ng Facili t_i . `. i"_ . Tile fo_1O~riinq uS~B 'pe-r=nltted in C-2 ~Nl.t'Ci a SpeC`i ai USe Perm~_ Shall be prohibited on the 5.25 acre parcel. P_utomobile Repair Se.rv_ces , M= J or +~.°°'" Dance Hall Manufactured Home Sale Truc:~ Stogy Landf~ii, Robbie Transtiortation Terminal Gutdcor Gatherings Res'_aurant, Drive-.n ar_d Fast Focd SP~I~TG~r70CD P_SSOCIATESy L,L,C, ^~ .~ f ; .~,~ __;z.__._ _... ,. r a. Z:\WP50\LISA.\ZONING\25PRING,PRO:laf02;1bi49 .... .. I' \ ~~ Z '- -- ~ ~ t ', y ` I II ~ \ d ~..... rte` ] f" _ ..Zi. ... U "111 Z _~ ~k ~ o , ~;~ _ L' _ rr.~~ 'O i ~ l - li r'';%aa~ ,`vQJ~ 7 ~A :~ ~ O ~ - _ O ~ / ~, y`~ \/ ~ ~r~ 11 I 1 ~o ~ ~ _ '-~f ~ r G ~ l ~-~ _ ~ ~ `~ ~%, ~ ~, ~~ >} , g~ ~ ., ,~ I ~ r~ I ~~ ~ O .s~ ~')n -, OL 11 J ~. rr~~r~~b"T U~,, ~ ~ t'1 ;~r r ~ ~ ~ ~ ___ ~'~ ~ ~ ~l roL~r~7t7 -r'.s !r ~,,~r,3, a r °• ~ : • ter ~~ ~ r' « ~4yrH l ~ v~ 1 ~' C ~ ~ a d ~ ..v M ~ ~~t k l~~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ; O ~ Q _ r ~ ~b ~ `3 ~ >~~ %w'~' Y,~ m r B I w ~, r -- ~ r ~ 4 - ~ ~ ~ ,,~ ~1 I - ~ ~ .~~~ ~ - ~ ~ + ,; ~, + r ~ f ii I i ~~ _ ~ ~~, r ~ __ w_ rr ~ ,p ~ r ~/ r r y w~ .~ r"- l ~'r j ~ w ~ I ~ '~ ~~ 1 -- 1 -_ --- w~~ ~ _ i ~ - _ - ---- ------ 11 I ', O ~T~~ .- - i~ _ _-. -- ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~~= ~ ~ ~. --- .~~~ ~~ f f l f I 1 I I I -- _ ~ ' ~i ~ ~ ~ F / / ~ ~__ _ ~ / ~ ~ J .- ~ .-_ - - ' ' - - - - - BRA,tIBLETON A V NUE, ~ - - - - - - - - - _ ~ _ _ _ Q a - p m - - - - - m a --_--- y -------~ i~ _._ - _ ~ RD~iN~~.~' Cfltlt~TY S`.~~'i~'a„~2t»~~ Ass~oci~t~s, L.Q.C. ~~~ ~~r~~ ~s~ ~'2~~ ~ ~ I 1 ~ , ' ` ~ I ~„ ~, .,,.,~ ~~~ .._ ..~..~TING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOICE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 1999 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF APPROXIMATELY 10-ACRES OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED IN THE VICINITY OF BRAMBLETON AVENUE AND ELECTRIC ROAD (PART OF TAX MAP NOS. 77.13-5-35; 77.13-5-38; 77.13-5-39, 77.13-5- 40; ALL OF TAX MAP NOS. 77.13-5-43.1; 77.13-5-43.2; 77.13-5-47; 77.13-5-48; 77.13-5-49; 77.13-5-50; 77.13-5-51) IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-2 AND C-2 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2 WITH CONDITIONS AND GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO OPERATE FAST FOOD RESTAURANTS AND DRIVE-THRUS, UPON THE APPLICATION OF SPRINGWOOD ASSOCIATES LLC WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 23, 1999, and the second reading and public hearing were held March 23, 1999; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 2, 1999; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing approximately 10 acres, as described herein, and located in the vicinity of Brambleton Avenue and Electric Road (Part of Tax Map Nos. 77.13-5-35; 77.13-5-38; 77.13-5-39, 77.13-5-40; All of Tax Map Nos. 77.13-5-43.1; 77.13-5-43.2; 77.13-5-47; 77.13-5-48; 77.13-5-49; 77.13-5-50; 77.13-5-51) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-2, Medium Density Residential District, and C-2, General Commercial District, to the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District with conditions. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Springwood Associates LLC. 3. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Springwood Associates LLC to operate fast food restaurants and drive-thrus to be located in the vicinity of Brambleton Avenue and Electric Road on three parcels designated as Site A, Site B, and Site C on the Conceptual Development Plan 1 S-~ ~iv~aivu „y „lla.,n~ ~,J~,,,,,,,,,,,,, dated February 10, 1999, in the Cave Spring Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1999 Community Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.2-2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved with the following conditions: 4. That the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts: (1) The property will be developed in substantial conformity with the Conceptual Development Plan prepared by Shanks Associates, dated February 10, 1999, attached hereto and made a part hereof. [Invalid proffer -not signed by owner of a portion of the real estate.] (2) The large parcel (5.26 acres) will be developed for general commercial use in either one (1) parcel or maybe divided into smaller parcels or a commercial condominium for conveyances and general commercial areas. (3) The three (3) parcels designated as Site A, Site B and Site C are to be granted Special Use Permits for drive-thru facilities for permitted uses including, but not limited to, fast food restaurants. [Invalid proffer -not signed by owner of a portion of the real estate identified as Site C] [Questionable proffer because Special Use Permit is granted by separate action of the Board not as a proffered condition.] (4) A buffer strip, as shown on the above plan, shall be located along the property line adjoining the properties on Westmoreland Avenue. [Invalid proffer -not signed by owner of a portion of the real estate.] 2 ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ v ~ ' ' • S (5) No parking lot light pole shall exceed 22' above grade. (6) No offpremises advertising signs shall be allowed on the property other than for the uses within the zoned property. [This proffer violates the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance.] (7) All retaining walls constructed on the property shall be constructed as split faced architectural block or equivalent. (8) The finished floor elevation of any building on the 5.26 acre parcel shall be no higher than 1150 feet. (9) The total square footage to be developed on the 5.26 acre parcel shall not exceed 70,000 square feet of commercial uses. (10) The following C-2 uses shall be prohibited on the 5.26 acre parcel: Home Occupation, Type I; Halfway House; Park and Ride Facility; Post Office; Public Parks and Recreational Areas; Bed and Breakfast; Boarding House; Commercial Outdoor Sports and Recreation; Gasoline Station; Kennel, Commercial; Pawn Shop Recycling Centers and Stations; Amateur Radio Tower; Parking Facility. (11) The following uses permitted in C-2 with a Special Use Permit shall be prohibited on the 5.26 acre parcel: Automobile Repair Services, Major; Dance Hall; Manufactured Home Sales; Truck Stop; Landfill, Rubble; Transportation Terminal; Outdoor Gatherings; Restaurant, Drive-In and Fast Food. 5. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the northerly side of Virginia Route 419, Electric Road, at the southwesterly corner of the Rite Aid property; thence leaving Route 419 and with the Rite Aid property and proceeding N. O1 deg. 50 sec. 26 min. W. 111.57 feet to a point; thence N. 13 deg. 23 3 I ~ > ~. J ~ ~ 1 • ~ t ~ • sI sec. 34 min. E. 116.17 feet to a point; thence N. 82 deg. 29 min. 30 sec. E. 58.55 feet to a point; thence N. 11 deg. 40 min. 25 sec. E. 313.06 feet to a point; thence S. 76 deg. 56 min. 51 sec. E. 1.54 feet to a point; thence N. 23 deg. 09 min. 59 sec. E. 166.11 feet to a point; thence S. 74 deg. 21 min. 55 sec. E. 110.78 feet to a point; thence S. 59 deg. 35 min. 55 sec. E. 519.51 feet to a point; thence s. 38 deg. 31 min. 50 sec. W. 344.09 feet to a point; thence S. 53 deg. 23 min. 02 sec. E. 236.76 feet to a point; thence S. 64 deg. 49 min. 34 sec. W. 101.93 feet to a point; thence S. 55 deg. 31 min. 06 sec. E. 34.13 feet to a point; thence S. 20 deg. 06 min. 28 sec. W. 136.88 feet to a point; thence N. 79 deg. 03 min. 14 sec. W. 359.12 feet to a point; thence N. 64 deg. 54 min. 15 sec. W. 298.98 feet to the point of beginning. 6. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. 4 O~ POANp,~~` ~ . ; -s 9 Z ,~c~ o Z a 1 38 AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ APPEARANCE REQUEST /PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW; ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: f-cr~~~s~ ~'L ~ , ~`'~E' ~j C:~} ~ 2 ADDRESS: ~ 3 ~S/,~ ' ~? i' ~ ~`% l? , l~r~ . S'; t PHONE: ~ ~ ~ ~-- ~J ~ / ,~ --~-- r . . ~ ~ ~ M • Y r QOAN ~~ O ~ .: :. "ic. ?~ z .. _ o . ~ e a AGENDA ITEM NO. 183$ APPEARANCE REQUEST ~_PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~ -~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL//VES L/STED BELOW; ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shat! file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: S~-z rrnn~ ~ S ADDRESS: 3~~Z (~tJ.as~,'~c,r~ ~ y-,~ ~L PHONE: 17J` 35 4 ,. SZ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 1999 ORDINANCE 032399-9 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO VAUGHN WILBURN TO CONSTRUCT MINI-WAREHOUSES TO BE LOCATED IN THE 7200 BLOCK OF BARRENS ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 27.13-5-47), HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Vaughn Wilburn has filed a petition to construct mini-warehouses to be located in the 7200 block of Barrens Road (Tax Map No. 27.13-5-47) in the Hollins Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 2, 1999; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on February 23, 1999; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on March 23, 1999. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Vaughn Wilburn to construct mini-warehouses to be located in the 7200 block of Barrens Road (Tax Map No. 27.13-5-47) in the Hollins Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1999 Community Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.2-2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved with the following conditions: (1) A planting strip as shown on the attached plan entitled "1st Security Self Storage, Roanoke Co., Virginia" prepared by Providence 1 t Engineering, dated 3/23/99, shall be provided adjacent to Barrens Road, South Drive, and the Peters Creek Apartments. Leyland Cypress trees shall be planted within this planting strip. The trees shall be a minimum of 10' in height at the time of planting and shall be planted no more than 5' on center. (2) The outside wall on the front building located on Barrens Road and the outside wall on the building parallel to Peters Creek Road will be of a concrete Tiltwall construction with stucco or textured swirl finish. This construction shall include the office. (3) The color of the buildings and doors shall be nonreflective and of an earthtone colors to blend with the Carillon facility and the Peters Creek Apartments. (4) The signage shall conform to all of the C-1 sign standards instead of C-2 standards. The C-1 sign standards allow for 0.5 square feet of signage per foot of road frontage, a maximum freestanding sign height of 15 feet, and sets a limit of (4) four signs for the business. (5) The mini-warehouse buildings shall be located on the site and access to the site shall be in substantial conformity with the Layout, Access & Landscaping Plan for the 1st Security Self Storage plan prepared by Providence Engineering under date of December 29, 1998. 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance with condition #1 amended, and carried by the following recorded vote: 2 AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: L~~c.J Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Terry Harrington, County Planner John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 3 3/23/99 tmtmES, ucHnr~c, ~ ow~ruc~ /'~ ~_ Providence En~ineerinc~ ~L J aol? r N ~ &eI,~I~~ ~ ~i Consulting Engtineers 15TRAANOK~ C~R~ ' ,~,. ' P~TITION~ER: VAUGHN WILBURN CASE NUMBER: 9-3/99 Planning Commission Hearing Date: March 2, 1999 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: March 23, 1999 A. REQUEST Petition of Vaughn Wilburn to obtain a Special Use Permit to construct mini warehouses, located in the 7200 block of Barrens Road, Hollins Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS No one spoke. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION None. D. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS 1. A minimum (6) six foot planting strip shall be provided adjacent to Barrens Road for the full length of the site which shall include a minimum of (1) one large deciduous, large evergreen, or small deciduous tree planted every 30 feet. 2. The outside wall on the front building located on Barrens Road and the outside wall on the building parallel to Peters Creek Road will be of a concrete Tiltwall construction with stucco or textured swirl finish. This construction shall include the office. 3. The color of the buildings and doors shall be nonreflective and of an earthtone colors to blend with the Carillon facility and the Peters Creek Apartments. 4. The signage shall conform to all of the C-1 sign standards instead of C-2 standards. The C-1 sign standards allow for 0.5 square feet of signage per foot of road frontage, a maximum freestanding sign height of 15 feet, and sets a limit of (4) four signs for the business. 5. The mini warehouse buildings shall be located on the site and access to the site shall be in substantial conformity with the Layout, Access & Landscaping Plan for the 1st Security Self Storage plan prepared by Providence Engineering under date of December 29, 1998. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S~ Mr. Witt to recommend approval of the petition with conditions. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Thomason, Witt, Robinson, Hooker NAYS: None ABSENT: Ross F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan Staff Report Terrance arri~~'' Roanoke Co.~it~ _ Vicinity Map L Other Pla~ng Commission STAFF REPORT , <~ PETITIONER: Vaughn Wilburn PREPARED BY: John Murphy CASE NUMBER: #9 - 3/99 DATE: 3-2-99 PART I A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This is a request for a Special Use Permit on a 4.61 acre, C-2 zoned parcel in order to construct and operate mini-warehouses. The property is currently owned by Friendship Manor Apartment Village Corporation and is located in the 7200 block of Barrens Road, across from the Burlington Elementary School. The sale of the property is pending the approval of the Special Use Permit. The property is designated Transition in the Roanoke County Community Plan. B. DESCRIPTION This is a petition of Vaughn Wilburn to request a Special Use Permit fora 4.61 acre parcel currently zoned C-2 in order to construct and operate mini-warehouses. The property is located in the 7200 block of Barrens Road, beside the Carilion Family Medicine facility in the Hollins Magisterial District. The applicant has submitted a copy of the following "proffers" for the Special Use Permit: 1. The property will be developed as amini-warehouse facility in substantial conformity with the Layout, Access & Landscaping Plan for the 1 st Security Self Storage prepared by Providence Engineering under date of December 29, 1998. 2. Signage will be as set forth on the Layout, Access & Landscaping Plan identified above. 3. A resident manager will occupy the premises. 4. Exterior lighting will be shown on the site plan. On the outside of the front gate, lighting will be located only on the front planter and parking areas. Interior lighting will include fluorescent wallpaks. Lighting will exist on all drives inside the project. A security gate will be located at the entrance to the property. The only access will be through the security gate. The outside wall on the front building located on Barrens road will be of a concrete Tiltwall construction with stucco swirl finish. This construction shall include the office. The outside wall of the remainder of the premises will be metal siding. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Mini-warehouse facilities are permitted only by Special Use Permit in the C-2 and I-1 zoning districts. The Use and Design Standards are numerous and include a minimum lot size of (2) two acres, a minimum front yard setback of 35 feet, the prohibition of security fencing or gates within ~~ the front yard setback or buffer yard, and the prohibition of any cubicle doors facing residentially zoned property. The following uses are prohibited: tenant or commercial auctions or garage sales; servicing of motor vehicles, boats, trailers, lawn mowers or other similar appliances; the operation of power tools, spray-painting equipment, table saws, lathes, compressors, welding equipment, kilns or other similar equipment; the storage or combustibles, explosives or hazardous materials and operating a moving and storage business. Site design standards include minimum 26 foot wide interior driveways when cubicles open onto one side only and minimum 30 foot wide interior driveways when cubicles open onto both sides to accommodate loading and unloading at the individual units. Adequate turning radiuses shall be provided where appropriate for vehicles at least 30 feet long. A 10 foot wide landscaped area consisting of small evergreen trees and shrubs bordering the outdoor storage of motor vehicles, trailers, and recreational vehicles shall be provided. Accommodations for alive-in manager shall be permitted. A shared access with the Carilion Family Medicine facility is proposed. VDOT will still require a commercial entrance permit for the new use. Site plan review shall be required to ensure compliance with County regulations. PART II A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS LQC~tion -The property is located on the west side of Barrens Road (Rt. 1832) between the Carilion Family Medicine facility and the Peters Creek Apartments, situated directly across from the Burlington Elementary School. This site was once used as the maintenance facility for Friendship Manor. The proposed site is just at the outer limits of the current Williamson Road Corridor Improvement Project. The site is in the Peters Creek Community Planning Area and urban services are available. 2opQgraphy/Vegetation/APpearance -The parcel is generally flat, situated slightly below grade of Barrens Road. There is a network of both gravel and paved driveways that access Barrens Road and a paved parking area. The site is mostly covered in grass with a (4) four foot earthen berm parallel to the paved drive. There are several old frame and cinder block buildings on the site. The site is not located within a F.E.M.A. 100 year flood plain. ~tu'ro_t~nding Neighborhoszd - To the north of this site is the Carilion Family Medicine facility zoned C-2. The Burlington Elementary School is across Barrens Road from the site and is zoned C-2. To the west of the proposed project site is South Drive which is zoned R-3 and has a series of single family residential lots and homes and a larger 5.33 acre tract of R-3 property behind these lots. To the immediate south of the site are the Peters Creek Apartments also zoned R-3. B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site_Lay_out/Architecture -The shape of the lot is generally a rectangle with a "pan-handle" on the southwestern corner. The pan-handle is proposed to be the storm water management area for the project. The applicant is proposing (10) ten separate mini-warehouse buildings including (2) two climate controlled storage buildings. The applicant is proposing a 20' x 30' combination ,~-"° office and apartment for live-in manager located at the entrance to the site. The concept plan dated December 29, 1998, prepared by Providence Engineering, indicates a total of 650 storage units. A total of (8) eight of the buildings will be parallel to Peters Creek Road, with the remaining (2) two buildings parallel to the east and west sides of the site. The applicant has indicated that the outside wall on the front building located on Barrens Road will be a concrete Tiltwall construction with a stucco swirl finish. This will be the same construction material for the office. The outside wall on the remainder of the premises will be metal siding. AocessLCir~ulatiQn -Access to the site is proposed to be shared with the existing entrance to the Carilion Family Medicine facility located at the front or northwest corner of this site. Traffic circulation on the site is proposed to be channeled through a card access security system. Traffic CT~neratinn -There is no data available on traffic counts for the section of Barrens Road between Peters Creek Road and the cul- de- sac. Generally the traffic patterns on Barrens Road at this site may be heavy during the school loading and unloading hours and typical early morning rush hour for the apartment complex. The site itself should not have "peals hours". The applicant has supplied information stating a maximum number of 30 cars per day. Fsre_&RcsoueQ..Ltilities -Public utilities are available to the site. Fire and rescue reports that services will continue at the current level. The comments provided to staff from fire and rescue indicated a concern with only (1) one access to the site as well as the location of the manager's parking spaces possibly restricting the maneuvering of fire apparatus. The primary fire and rescue response will be by the Hollins Station located on Barrens Road just across Peters Creek . Road. C. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The site is designated as Transition in the Roanoke County Community Plan. This Land Use Designation encourages office and institutional uses. A high degree of architectural design and environmentally sensitive site design is encouraged. One land use policy in Transition requires higher development standards for all types of development in relation to landscaping, signage, building design and parking lots. All new development should use the natural topography as a design element of their site. D. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The proposed project generally conforms to the zoning ordinance. Several items shown on the site plan will need to be adjusted during the plan review process in order to comply with County regulations. The freestanding sign is shown in a public utility easement which should be located outside of the easement and setback at least 15 feet from the property line. On the south side of the site (adjoining the Peters Creels Apartments) the plan shows that Type C Option 1 screening will be in place using the building wall as the barrier. The zoning ordinance requires for Type C Option 1 a (6) six foot screening. The building may not be used as the screening. t PA~2'll' III A. STA;Ii~ Cfl1~i~;LUS~C~I'~1S .S- 3~ The Transition land use designation is geared for an office and institutional use and concentrates on a high degree of architectural design and environmentally sensitive site design. The plan provides minimal landscaping for a site so highly visible to the Peters Creels comdor and bordering the edge of the Williamson Road Corridor Improvement Project. The applicant has provided a list of "proffers" for the Special Use Permit. Proffers are not used with a Special Use Permit so they maybe considered as suggestions for the Commission to review. Staff suggesis that substantially more landscaping be provided than the amount shown on the site plan. In discussions with staff, the applicant indicates a desire to develop the site in a manner that will far exceed the minimum requirements for landscaping and is proposing to make the project's appearance fit in with the character of the existing neighborhood. Staff would recommend that the site plan only be used to generally establish the placement of the buildings but add additional landscaping and signage requirements. Staff has great concern with the 500 square foot freestanding sign concept that is shown on the plan. A standard billboard has an area of only 378 square feet. Staff feels that the 500 square foot freestanding sign will be grossly out of character with the intent of the Transition designation. Should the Planning Commission recommend approval of this request staff recommends the following conditions: 1. A minimum (6) six foot planting strip shall be provided adjacent to Barrens Road for the fiill length of the site which shall include a minimum of (1) one large deciduous, large evergreen, or small deciduous tree planted every 30 feet. 2. The outside wall on the front building located on Barrens Road and the outside wall on the building parallel to Peters Creek Road will be of a concrete Tiltwall constniction with stucco or textured swirl finish. This construction shall include the office. 3. The color of the buildings and doors shall be nonreflective and of an earthtone colors to blend with the Carilion facility and the Peters Creek Apartments. 4. The signage shall conform to all of the C-1 sign standards instead of C-2 standards. The C-1 sign standards allow for 0.5 square feet of signage per foot of road frontage, a maximum freestanding sign height of 15 feet, and sets a limit of (4) four signs for the business. The mini-warehouse buildings shall be located on the site and access to the site shall be in substantial conformity with the Layout, Access & Landscaping Plan for the 1st Security Self Storage plan prepared by Providence Engineering under date of December 29, 1998. • • ,~ COUN7`~ 0~ RaAi~10KE QEPT. OF PL~NNtI~G ,~l`!D Z~~ING i 5204 Se'nard Or. ~_ , !r; P.G. Sox 29800 ` j Roanok'3. VA 2d•012 `~ ~ ` ~ 54~' 77z-ZOSB F~.x ty ~o ; 772-21128 ror Starr use oru data.r ~efj' e~;yi;celiC~ <c~7 i ~,+a^_9ads issued {~ ._---= Case Numb+,r: ' ;; ~ ~~, a~~ dot V ~""!+e r SOS doer '~ (,1 ..i ...... •~•I,I Vi: k,: ;+i!:,li4; iii , e ~iidjl•: il+{i;ap!,.;i ~j ii~~a:i~,~i,!,i.~!'~~!:iii I ~`-h i c ,'^L:¢itrlil li ~'"''`~h::iii'~~'1`i'1'i1i '~ i~:~T'~,[litt!i~~; i-1ii~~ 'tit,,,~yC 1c , r h.~{ 1 II , 1,1 t~ AL, ,i, ! I '~ 1 1 , , 1111{ }I{i1111y .2iP ~ w.r ~.l~r w},!;!?i! r..~.IG111,14'.. - .~ta....f..l tlr ,..~ ..l uttl4.., ~... ,.t.l..l.., Ll ins-.~. :1., r. r..- . 1 Li . ,~.:..-L,.,. r r - - ~ - -- Check type of applteatian filed tCheCk dll ingt Spply): C1 REZONING ISI SPECIAL USt ^VARIANCE ~.ppttcant's name: ®au87~u. T,Tilburv Phone: 77~-1197 Address: cJo Edward A. Hiatt, Esquire Zip Code: 24018 1919 Electric S,oad, SW, Roanobre, VA Owner's Hama: ~'si~nd9hip Manos Apartment Village Corpcratian Phone: Address: 927 H~rshbmr~er Rosci, HW, &sssnolca, V4 24012 Zip Code: Lacatlon of property: 4.61 a~cze>a i ax Map Nurnoer: 27.13-5-47 8arz~ae Road (Ve. Sac. Rt. 1$3~) Magisteria) fllstrici: Hollins Commvnlry Planning Area: Ho1?ins Size o? parcel (~): Exlszfng Zoning: C-Z General Cot>mmercia? 4.51 acres rxisting land Usa: Vacant sq . ft. ii { }I,r :4-:"• . f• C:' .t..., , i i, .. 'llVa, i~l•~ ~. r.l. .. 111:`:1:::" ~~>"~~~.~ I(k:i1i~{/~ iMCj+1i."-. r!: ~1l tttl Vii Ill~l~!:Iil i:~l:{il Itll lrtilll Ill`{ 1 i lli'i`~tJ:lit yrl.li Ili . I;i ,yi I ` t pill }r' Fi.l ^Hdadlilla. .. ~ ~ ,--• li t ~} .~-..r-~ u,,i7 S' r, ,~* 1 . l.4~a i~ ' 1 •5•,~ f :.. 'j }5r.~!.1 ryr }{a! f 1 pL'? ' ?' Itlll :y~~ l i- ili ft ~ 5 i ~ t ~ ~ y ~ 1, I,y ~ . ., : : f , S i~R Proposed Zoning: C"2 Gestaral C1~~ercial - Spacial Use Per'~it For 3tafl vav o~/>, I Proooaed Land Use. M1ni 4Tarehouszs use Tyre: r i Does the parts( me'a't t1~e minimum 1oc area, widta, and frontage requir8m~rftS of ttte requested district? YES Z Np I= NQ, A VAF,IANCE iS REQUIRED FIRST. Does th p real meet the minimum critoria for the r®qupsted Use Type? `!ES x NO IF NC), A VARIANCE 1S RE`GUIFiED FIRS''. 14 rezening r2lquest,~re candltians being proriered with this reQU®st? YES NO I :.,u r,'{`: rr. , p' tll)~ .ip1 : :r; yl., ..v..Gti:if ~iiil~.i~,Fii~{i ~,'i!1 ('~i~'i: I) : f ! ftl ~1~•: •lcl• rl 1'}1,1 1 'ci'i G {~l '<:rv.. ~. F'. .i•i:Rt}}~.i~l~ ! {~1 i'.,:r: >> [y ~l~~ 1`~ 1 i:Gh:~~:!.i;l ll! R~f.ll+11'L1~r 1-t' '1:~ 11!1!1:1 ~: l.) , 1 ~1j ~ t 1 ~~ 1 .~. 1• ~~ -.`,.rli 1:,:'C .iy:1~.!1~I:t1 •: •: :'<i(.. Nt.t~.'~, 1~~ 1 ~~I 11 L l~r. \f 1'f.,.1lI~: r I -F w. 1.1,1.. li,ll~: (!• t- $l:di?'I 1 1•:,.y,.nh'; ... ~:.. ! ~ kk i i~'' ii{ , I t-ISi 1 dol n:~l l ,a Prl ,ififii•I~i'•iii;ri~llilo.l.ltt t" l~1 i l ~i ~ i ~ > i~ .l i , i ,, . ug rt1l .t i1,1.q/• IYFRhl~Jllr':: rx :;•~:;:~'il.rall ,•lifiKi t 1. . @f F i :•' . vartonc® of SaC.ion{g) of the P.oanoke County Zoning OrdinanCC in Crdsr to: Is the mpp(ICation completet Please checs< if mnclosed. APpIlCATtGN WILL NC?T tnE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF T.HESc 1TEM5 ARE M[SSiNG OR iNCOMPLB?'G. Iva v w~ v Ns v S Cansvh>ation 8 1f2' x 1 1' concept plan AppiiCation fee ~ App[to~tion x MOtea and bounds deRrripilon Preffar5, if sOGtiCeblO ~ ,1UStlflc3T~on Water Snd savor application X Adjoining property owners l hereby cera'fy fhat ! am either rho owner of rho property or the owner's sgenl or cor trot; purcnssar anG err; dA:ing wrrh the knowledge and str! dr the owner. , Qwner'3 Signature: r-o~ StarY Use Cnly: Case Number . ~~~--}ff /Y ^r~Fy~. .y~y (,~y /r y/+ ~y+~' / {,e~+ }~ ~ y~ [ [~ r L6 /2 .~Y+^y5 }r-.~. / ~. {~ }r-.+ .. ..:V U4:l:FL a.1-r17.: ~G ~~~:R, ~Y I, ~C. A%..' Y~(Y ~'~r~;44'~Y-/~1,~:G4 f+' i J-.1~71~F~• ~~~.J ~1.. ,,~~6yy` 'Mwpw~ ..(i~AY ' Applicant Vaughn Wilburn The Planning Commission wiil study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justificatian far the change in terms or public heaith~, safety, and general ~rreifare. Pease ans•rver the fol!c~.^~ing questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. • • Please explain how the request furhers the purpcsas or the Zoning Grdinance (Section 30-3} as we!! as t~~e purpose found at the beginning of the aopiicable zoning distrct a!assificaticn in the zoning ordinance. The provisions of the County Zoning Ordinance classify the property as general commercial.. Mini warehouses are a permitted use in a general commercial district. The proposed use will provide for the use of a commercial property without a heavy impact of traffic. No burden will be placed on County utilities for the proposed use. ~~ F!ease explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Comprehensve Flan. The County Comprehensive Plan calls for the use of properties of this nature for commercial use. This commercial use is a low volume traffic generator with little noise and very little impact and therefore provides a good transition between the commercial uses on Peters Creek Road and the adjoining properties. F!ease describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properies, and the surrounding area, a5 'Nell 3S the impacts on public services and fccl!ItIeS, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks recreation, and fire/rescue. The use of the property is proposed and will have no negative impact on utilities or services provided by the County. ~. ~. fir. ~, . 1 ~7 Trails®nd ~ ~ Goadview Virginia 2~ Fhone 550-~97-7547 ~ rax FCC-237-1071 February 24, 1999 Planning and Zoning John Murphy Roanoke County RE: Mini Warehouse Appearances Dear Sir: Our intention is to blend the appearance of our facility into the neighborhood while maintaining security for our customers. The concept design is simple. As the owner and a design-build concrete contractor, I am planning to use all concrete where applicable to include driveways and walls of buildings. Plan Scope 1. All buildings will act as security fencing; therefore, the back or outside wall is solid. The only entry-way (ncn-solid wall) into the mini complex will be our front computer gate, 2. Concrete tilt wall: will be visible as walls from Barrens Road and facing Carilion. The finish is to be stucco or textured swirl, with a two-colored accent. 3. The back wall facing out to the drainage ditch and rear road will be hidden in trees. It is my plan to leave this as metal. I could then access the drainage ditch by taking panels down without disturbing the tree line behind the building. 4. The final wall facing the apartment complex could be metal or concrete. 5. Color scheme: we are open to gray or earth tones. No bright colors are intended. 6. Front area / Barrens Road: our intent is to satisfy code plus place a nice planter area compatible with Carilion's decor of planters. If there are further questions, Please call me at (540) 297-7647. Thanl~ you n .F3 ~ ~ _ „r ~~ Vaughn~,~Wi l burn ~~ • VINIJHIA ~0~ 3NOMlOL om crs ors srmz erre,u • .mow «...r ~ sr~ ~ !I 3;riRIQ1S j'L3S 1.ll21fg3S 1SL s.caaui6u,~ &u.;ylnsun~ me ~ i~0 ~i~~aerrYUg Kris ~~ ~ .~, .ten 6u;r,.,r,aau26u~ aauap22o.~d ~ -- g ~~~~~~~~.~ o ~ -~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ,~ $~'~ ~~~~ s-~ - vtnuatn ar ~unvua - cols ins ~wan~~s ~s~ . 8.~aauvsu~ suti~1~.,.oa ~ ~~ lae ~'`,1 1-~ ,1;a.l~~ ~~~ ~ '~~~ '~~~ Bu~,.,caau2~'u~ aauap2zo.~d - ~.~. • R ~ ..`~~ - ~ ! ~9~'l ..' \ \ Via:, ~'s ...,r''~ i F, -„~,-"'~"~ __ i .w ff /+ ~~.5 2mihr\ Churcn \ _,..,^,.. 1" r p "' ~ ~~ 1 'Y lJ 1 ?~ ~~1 '\ 1- .r'"'T;~ mss'.. .~ ~' :'= ~•.r../„- ~ 'fl \ I~ ~"V ! J ~ ~'~ r~, -~ ~~. ~p1 SCI. ~ ~ ~ a~ ~~ ~ ~ i ~: of " ~ :7 ~ ~ .~~ ` `\•~ `~, 9 ~~ N~ a ~, o .. .V ~' ~ i a,~f \ ~,~ Vii''... ° \ ,~ ~ '1 •..~~ .~ ~~1 .:: ejh A~ ~:~ 9V/` ~ AP ~,I pew '~ •, L 1 ,/ \ ~ \S `~ ~ aril `~~ ~ \\\ a ~~ ~ ~ ~ tsa ~ ~~ \. , ,, ~- ~R.~ ~~ ,, ~ ~C ~ ~„ ~- .- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~_ ', \ ~~ - .~; \ ~ v:,ti ~"~/ ,.. /-'' \ ~. ,a ~' ~~ :az~:.w wua ~U~,V~~~ GC'U1~TY ~~~'?~3~'TI'd~~NT d~' ~'Ljl~'t~~JtV~~'Y ~7.~' 1.~~' 1~±~1$~~'~'~nl~'` ,S~P.C2t~,L' ~~~~ .~2'.'"~12~ S- ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 1999 ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO VAUGHN WILBUItN TO CONSTRUCT MINI-WAREHOUSES TO BE LOCATED IN THE 7200 BLOCK OF BARRENS ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 27.13-5-47), HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Vaughn Wilburn has filed a petition to construct mini-warehouses to be located in the 7200 block of Barrens Road (Tax Map No. 27.13-5-47) in the Hollins Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 2, 1999; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on February 23, 1999; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on March 23, 1999. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Vaughn Wilburn to construct mini-warehouses to be located in the 7200 block of Barrens Road (Tax Map No. 27.313-5-47) in the Hollins Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1999 Community Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.2-2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved with the following conditions: (1) A minimum (6) six foot planting strip shall be provided adjacent to Barrens Road for the full length of the site which shall include a minimum of (1) one large deciduous, large evergreen, or small deciduous tree planted every 30 feet. (2) The outside wall on the front building located on Ban ens Road and the outside wall on the building parallel to Peters Creek Road will be of a concrete Tiltwall construction with stucco or textured swirl finish. This construction shall include the office. (3) The color of the buildings and doors shall be nonreflective and of an earthtone colors to blend with the Carilion facility and the Peters Creek Apartments. (4) The signage shall conform to all of the C-1 sign standards instead of C-2 standards. The C-1 sign standards allow for 0.5 square feet of signage per foot of road frontage, a maximum freestanding sign height of 15 feet, and sets a limit of (4) four signs for the S-~ business. (5) The mini-warehouse buildings shall be located on the site and access to the site shall be in substantial conformity with the Layout, Access & Landscaping Plan for the 1st Security Self Storage plan prepared by Providence Engineering under date of December 29, 1998. 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\ZONING\WILBURN.SUP 2 ~.. ,M AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 1999 DENIAL OF ORDINANCE 032399-10 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO HASH INVESTMENTS, LLC TO OPERATE A USED AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIP LOCATED AT 7650 WILLIAMSON ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 27.11-1-24.1), HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Hash Investments, LLC has filed a petition to operate a used automobile dealership located at 7650 Williamson Road (Tax Map No. 27.11-1-24.1) in the Hollins Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 2, 1999; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on February 23, 1999; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on March 23, 1999. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: On motion of Supervisor Johnson to DENY the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~• ~~ Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Terry Harrington, County Planner John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney A 1 ` ~ ,~ s c9 1. "' 27. 2Y'Y. ~ ~ `~~ t,pp Ac. 3.pp A.c_ ~~ ~ ~-Z A 765' ?i!.' .,~~7.>- .~ aza { ~'~ h~y~G~1"T 5~~ ~ k S, ~ Q~iC 1~ 4! ~f g 5 ~, ~'J ., ~ ~ 4g3~ ahs'~~~x~~~'v~ }~~~k4f~~~~~1x~~'~' ~, ~ \ 3l ~ Y n-,r4 lti ~ a'~", ~ 1,~.., H ~ ~' fY~ { U d 17 Y J 4!h 43 \ P i '7 Z.9p Ac. h ~~~~Y+'~~4_sN T~ p+~27'+ ~~~ .'~~'~{ \ 5 ~ ~ rt ~ ~' r \\ 5p s 'Y 7 e.l ~~~ .v tns'" t f, t~; tt+ 3, R ~'ix ~' ~'J ~ i 1~.{1 + t~1~h 1Jt w 1 4 ~+J L~ i'1 11 ,~ J ~ 1 ~~' ~=.~= ti 2' ~~ 1.34 Ac. ~~3t1. ~J+_ a lamuOp' ~ .~'L~~ 13. ~ . "'~ go :E,o : a:;. 12 ~'ry~ (~ ~, 11. ' fT ,p0 - ~ O. ~ P .! 5 : ~ ~~ 1.37 Re. .'.izg `ro 2p $ ~ „164 7.1 N ~ ~,se6~' ;J b~,jp 9, ~5 r~ ~12. N 2,30 Ac ,w+ qr bg J~ ~o m ~ ~.... lap ~3 $~ ~ ~~ ~ 1 ~ ~ u+ 1 ~ ,~`~ B ° 6 ~` r .c 65 ~ i~2T ..YS 7k R1JA1V'fl1Y~ GflL~1VTY' mash, ~ra~estm,ents LAC D~'PART1~~'1V?' (1F Specicxl Use Permit GL1.~d~iU1V~TY D~` .I,CdP~~NT 2 ~, # t -1-?~.1 '~ -~..~ • ' ~ PETITIONER: HASH INVESTMENTS CASE NUMBER: 10-3/99 Planning Commission Hearing Date: March 2, 1999 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: March 23, 1999 A. REQUEST Petition of Hash Investments LLC, to obtain a Special Use Permit to operate a used automobile dealership, located at 7650 Williamson Road, Hollins Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS There were no citizen comments. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION Mr. Robinson stated that the site plan shows a significant amount of landscaping, and asked the applicant if he was comfortable with the staff recommended conditions. The applicant stated that he was prepared to implement all the landscaping on the plan, but would like the option of having the maximum height of the light poles revised from a recommended 22 feet to 25 feet. Staff responded that the 22 feet was a standard that the Commission had been recommending for other commercial projects. D. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS 1) Grassed and/or landscaped areas shall remain in their entirety as shown on the conceptual plan. 2) Parking lot lighting shall not exceed 22 feet in height. Poles, posts, light stations and other light details shall be grayish-brown or natural earth tone in color. 3) Freestanding signs shall be limited to one monumental sign, not to exceed 7 feet in height and 10 feet in width. The base shall be constructed of either brick or field stone. Signboard portions shall be made of redwood, southern yellow pine, high-density polyurethane foam cedar, painted steel or aluminum with anodized or baked on color scheme. Lighting, if used, shall be with in-ground units. 4) No portable signs shall be permitted. 5) A minimum of one 12 inch caliper tree for every 10 parking spaces shall be planted on site. 6) No more than 65 vehicles for sale will be stored on the site at a time and the vehicles must be parked within designated striped spaces. 7) Existing pine trees at the rear of the property shall remain. 8) Facade signs shall not exceed 5 percent of the area of the facade. 9) No banners exceeding 25 square feet in area, or pennants shall be displayed on the property at any time. 10) A minimum of five parking spaces shall be designated as permanent customer parking spaces. 11) The final site plan shall generally conform with the conceptual site plan and landscape plan drawn by Ted von Dameck and submitted as part of the special use permit process. ` T • 2 .. S -.3 E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Witt moved to recommend approval of the petition with the recommended conditions. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Hooker, Robinson, Thomason, Witt NAYS: ABSENT: Ross F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report _ Other a, Terranc Harri gton, S retary Roanoke Co ty Pla ing Commission STAFF REPORT S PETITIONER: Hash Investments, LLC CASE NUMBER: 10-3/99 PREPARED BY: David Tickner, AICP DATE: 02/26/99 PARTI A. Executive Summary The request is for a Special Use Permit on a parcel of approximately 1.23 acres, located at 7650 Williamson Road Northwest, in order to operate a used automobile dealership. The property is currently zoned C-2 Commercial and is designated as Core in the Community Plan. This use change conforms to the goals and objectives of the plan. There is an existing structure on the property, which was formerly used as a restaurant. The immediate surrounding environs consist of mostly commercial uses, with Hollins University and an apartment complex just down the street to the east of the property. B. Description This is a request by Hash Investments, LLC for a Special Use Permit fora 1.23 acre parcel of property located on Williamson Road Northwest approximately 950 feet from the intersection of Williamson Road and Plantation Road, in the Hollins Magisterial District. The proposal is for a used automobile dealership on property zoned as C-2 General Commercial. The property is located along an established commercial corridor. No structural additions or major exterior renovations to the building are planned. The applicant anticipates resurfacing and expanding the parking area. Hours of business are proposed to be somewhere around 9:00 a.m. until 8:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and more limited hours on Saturday. The proposed use is for used car sales only, with a possible car washing area at the rear of the lot (not for public use). C. Applicable Regulations Used automobile dealerships are permitted by special use permit in the C-2 General Commercial Zoning District. The following requirements are applicable. The use would have to meet the requirements set forth in Section 30-85-4 for used automobile dealership. Site Plan review and approval by County Staff, in accordance with Section 30-90 of the Zoning Ordinance, will be required. Off street parking, including handicapped spaces, will be in accordance with Section 30-91 of the Zoning Ordinance. Screening, landscaping, and buffer yards shall be in accordance with Section 30-92 of the Zoning Ordinance. Building codes may require structural modifica~ions to comply with ADA standards. Applicant will need to check with Inspections Department. VDOT will require a commercial entrance permit. Signs will be placed in accordance with Section 30-93 of the Zonin Ordinance. g Although not required, staff has suggested that improvements to the property be done conformance with the Williamson Road Corridor Improvement Project standards. PART II A. Analysis of Existing Conditions s-3 Location The property is located in the Hollins Magisterial District, approximately 950 feet from the intersection of Williamson Road and Plantation Road. Lot The lot currently has a 5,596 square foot vacant commercial building, a parking area with approximately 33 spaces, and two curb cuts on Williamson Road. There is an undeveloped section at the rear of the lot which has a row of white pines. Access The property currently has two curb cuts onto Williamson Road; one at the eastern end and one at the western end of the lot. Surrounding Neighborhood Adjacent land uses are mostly commercial. To the immediate east and north of the property is the Budget Motor Lodge. A small office complex is to the west of the property, as well as Hollins Manor. Across Williamson Road, to the south of the lot, are the Roanoke Motor Lodge, Lew's Pub, an electronics store and various other commercial uses. All lots in the immediate area are zoned either C-2 General Commercial or C-2 General Commercial with a Special Use Permit. Approximately 600 feet east of the property are Hollins University (Zoned C-1 office District) and Hollins Apartments (zoned R-3 Medium Density Multi-Family Residential). The lot is within the Williamson Road Corridor Improvement Project Area. ~. Analysis of Proposed Development Property Characteristics: The property is proposed to be a used automobile dealership, allowable as a special use in the C-2 General Commercial District. The Planning Commission can recommend conditions to the Board to insure that this development meets the specific and general standards for this use and area. Site Layout/Architecture: Attached with this report are three separate site plans. One is a survey of existing conditions on the lot. The other two are proposed changes to the site. The petitioner's proposal includes a one story building 5,596 square feet in area. After discussions with staff, the developer has proposed to realign his entrances so that the current two curb cuts will be reduced to one, in order to reduce ingress/egress congestion and safety problems for the site. This should increase safety for customers and emp-oyees entering and exiting the site, and increase the area available for landscaping. The site plan shows an increased parking area in the eastern and northern sides of the lot, with several additional spaces. The spaces along the side will be realigned. There will be additional spaces to the rear of the lot, with a retaining wall proposed. The wall will likely be composed of either timber or concrete. The white pines to the rear of the lot will not be affected by the added parking area and retaining wall. The applicant has made significant effort to comply with the Williamson Road Improvement Project Area standards for landscaping and signage. It is anticipated that the sign by the street will be an externally lit ground sign with a masonry foundation and possibly more stone incorporated into the sign. The applicant has told staff that a more detailed sign design will be presented at the public hearing. The site plan shows a 10 foot planting strip at the street side of the lot, which is required by ordinance. The planting concept along the front appears to either meet or exceed what is required. Additionally, the concept plan shows plantings along both sideJ'~ lot lines, which is not required by ordinance. There are also proposed plantings around the building. The applicant is unsure at this time what type of lighting will be used; it is anticipated that it will be fashioned to comply with the Williamson Road Improvement Project Area standards for lighting. The site plan shows approximately 16 light poles (represented by the small black boxes) along the perimeter of the site. The Planning Commission may want to attach conditions with regards to lighting. Access/Traffic Generation: Parking will be to the front, eastern and rear side of the building. The parking, loading, stacking, and circulation dimensions appear to meet the minimum criteria as set forth in the Ordinance and Public Street and Parking Design Standards and Specifications, although the specific number of spaces required will need to be determined. It again should be noted that the applicant is volunteering to reduce the access points from two to one. Economic Development: The Economic Development Department reports that the proposed business is located in an economic opportunity area, and supports the basic criteria of the economic development mission. Fire & Rescue: Emergency vehicle rescue time is estimated at four minutes or less. Drainaae/Floodolain: A stormwater management basin for the parking lot is not indicated on the conceptual plan. It is unclear at this point if one is needed; if so, a plan will have to be submitted to the Engineering staff. Screening & Buffering: Because all adjacent properties are zoned C-2 General Commercial, no buffering per Section 30- 92-4 (A) is required. Per Section 30-85-4 of the Zoning Ordinance, a ten foot planting is required adjacent to the right-of-way. The current proposal is for a ten foot strip. Additionally, because the plans for the parking area involve additional impervious surface, interior parking landscaping per Section 30-92-4 (C) will be required. Water/Sewer: The lot is serviced by County sewer and water. The Utility Department has determined that the use would not significantly affect the existing public facilities. C. Conformance with the Community Plan This property is designated as Core in the 1998 Community Plan. Core areas have the potential of becoming congested and visually cl~:ttered districts. Some of the guidelines for this district include establishing common links between adjacent sites and land uses; making movement between sites easy and safe, possibly through interconnecting parking lots; designing structures that compliment adjacent buildings; conserving natural site amenities such as slopes, trees and drainage; and designing exterior lighting and signage as integral architectural elements of the building, site and core area. With the landscaping and signage in the general spirit~of the"""y Williamson Road Corridor Improvement Project, the development meets Objective A by • ~ establishing common characteristics that will ensure ease of travel and visual coherence. Additionally, the reduction of curb cuts fulfills this objective as well. The proposal meets Objective B for the Core area (encourage the redevelopment of congested areas) in that it will be the utilization of an existing commercial building that has been vacant for several years. The project also meets Objective E, which seeks to concentrate intensive commercial uses into one area, by utilizing acommercially-zoned lot within an established commercial district. The project does not directly meet the goal of Objective D, creating pedestrian-oriented Core areas. Several of the objectives do not specifically relate to this project (C, which encourages the development of high density residential; F, which develops strategies to accommodate large box retail uses). D, Conformance with County Development Standard The proposed project could likely comply with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. Used automobile dealerships are required, among other things, to have aten-foot planting strip adjacent to any public streets. The applicant was made aware of this, and anticipates the need to tear up some of the pavement towards the front of the lot in order to meet this requirement. The applicant does not anticipate storing any vehicles that are missing major mechanical or body parts. The existing and proposed new parking spaces will meet the requirements for off-street parking as set forth in Section 30-91 of the Ordinance, which require 1 space per 300 square feet of building area. PART I I I Staff Conclusions According to the Community Plan, this area has been designated as Core, which is generally suited for this type of use. The site plan appears to meet all applicable development requirements. Used Automobile Sales is an allowable use by Special Use Permit in the C-2 General Commercial Zoning District. The proposal is within the Williamson Road Corridor Improvement Project Area, which has several additional recommended signage, landscaping, and exterior building standards. The applicant has made efforts to comply with these standards. The site plan does not generally have the appearance of a "typical" used automobile sales lot. If the Commission is in support of issuing this permit, staff has the following recommendations: 1) Grassed and/or landscaped areas shall remain in their entirety as shown on the conceptual plan. 2) Parking lot lighting shall not exceed 22 feet in height. Poles, posts, light stations and other light details shall be grayish-brown or natural earth tone in color. 3) Freestanding signs shall be limited to one monumental sign, not to exceed 7 feet in height and 10 feet in width. The base shall be constructed of either brick or field stone. Signboard portions shall be made of redwood, southern yellow pine, high-density polyurethane foam cedar, painted steel or aluminum with anodized or baked on color scheme. Lighting, if used, shall be with in-ground units. 4) No portable signs shall be permitted. 5) A minimum of one 1'/z inch caliper tree for every 10 parking spaces shall be planted on site. 6) No more than 65 vehicles for sale will be stored on the site at a time and the . vehicles must be parked within designated striped spaces. „~ .,., 7) Existing pine trees at the rear of the property shall remain. 8) Facade signs shall not exceed 5 percent of the area of the facade. 9) No banners exceeding 25 square feet in area, or pennants shall be displayed on the property at any time. 10) A minimum of five parking spaces shall be designated as permanent customer parking spaces. 11)The final site plan shall generally conform with the conceptual site plan and landscape plan drawn by Ted von Dameck and submitted as part of the special use permit process. • • ~., Owner's name: ~~ - )„', -~~~{ Address: ;~ ,7 c -~ ~~ ~ L , ~ l l ~1 c1 r-~~ 4r ~ ~ti, COU~d-I-Y G~ ROANOKE DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING 5204 Bernard Dr. P.0. Box 2x800 Roanoke, VA 24018 ( 540' 772-2o6a Fax (540 ~ 7 ?-2 i OS 1. Check type of application filed (check ai( that applyi: ~ REZONING Q SPECIAL USE COVARIANCE nv ~=~~-: A,pplicant's name: "~ -. Address: ~ _ (/~ y'~ ~~fti' tii . /~ v i7 ~~~ i9,') l0 tip ~` az. ~~_ %t" (~ ; ' ~,11 L; ` ~ . ~_ /_ (yr ~J ~l i ,~ ' ; ~ i For staff use only dal rye v ~- ~ 1 ~.~'~ ~ - ~i~ received by. "~^"° :Ypplicat~n ~ PCBZ" dote: placards issued: eOS date: Case Number: J,? l~'~~ ,~+ ~/' %Y~ y; ~ L [ ~~. Phone : ,y~'~ ":.~-Y~ ~ D ~ ~`J Zip Cooe: '~jl f; ~ ',t ~ .~i Fhone: Zip Ccde: Location or" properly: ~, Tax Map Number: ~~;';' /J- ~j `.:-i~~ ~ ~'~ Magisterial District: Nt~l ~ ~ v~`j ommunity Planning Area: ~~`~; ~5 Size of parcel (si: ~,,,i,~ acres sq.ft. ~~ Existing Zoning: (,_,~c~, „ I ---, E:<isting Land Use: ~j,,~~!~,ri_; ~~_i~~~, {f~,n ~, ::: ;:~I:::::. !`I ^y.~ ~::: I::; :,::;: PrODOSed Zoning -~C, Proposed Land Usc ~i~y'^,,C':.I ~,'~±.fi_ ~'CG•i~5 ~i ,,r LD`'3 'f';,C.'+~Ur\:, ~f~(~)~?'+:.. /Iii ~(. ~ Far Staf;" Use Oniy ~ ~USe type: 1 ~ Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES `v~ NO IF N0, A V,=;nl,^-,,^JCE IS REQUIRED FinST. , Coes the part°! meet the minimum criteria far the requested Use Type? YES ~.~ ~dO IF N0, A VAR!A.NCE 1S REQUIRED FIRST . If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO ,: `~ ,::::{ . .. . Variance of Sectionfs) or' the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order te: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED fF AN'f OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ars w ars fv Rrs Y'' Consultation ~ 8 1 /2" x 7 1 " concept plan '' ~ Application fee ~ , A lication -~ ivtetes and bounds description-- ~ Proffers, if applicable PP ~-~-`- Justification ~'~ Water and sc~Ner application L ~ L_ Adjoining property owners .hereby certify that I am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser an,d am acting vrirh the knave/edge and cons~t of the owner. i~ G' Owner's Signature: ,j`'j='L~ r•t~ '~__,~A_s.~-.- ~ i1 ,f~ ~ ti r`~ ~'~E'=L- ~ i 7 Gn ~ • For StaK Use Only: Case Numoer ~.. ~' ::~~"~ ' ,....'. P ` . ~•~' :~~r.`~;TI~11~:F~~%:~'.~'~`~t~,~~~,G:~.~?::5.:~.~fr.~~~;`,~s~;f'.-,t~,f~.~P......~. ~~' ..............................: Applicant Lf~;=;~~ ", l/,!1 ~'~~-~('l,'9U?;,(`;~ ,~_>;- (~ The Plannin Commission will stud rezonine and special use ermit re nests to determine the need and 9 1 _ P q justification for the change in terms of public heait~n, safety, and general ~weffare. Pleasa answer the follo';iing questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additicnai space if necessary. Please explain ho~rr the request furthers the purposes cf the Zoning Grdinance (Section 3G-3i as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance. { ) l ((( i i r i. h ~ 1 • • f I )UCi :,~ ;,;~,.. 71 ~ ~ ,.f~J ;: a ^ '°Y~ ~ n'~ r, y.' ii'~°. ~r~ ~~'/~'"~ L ~ L. -...__ _ ~. _ ,_ . ,.. + ~_~ L.~~ C t _ _ pia ~t`' ~` °. ~ i ~ P. , ~' , ' `~., c~ !i ~ /i i ~+ L ' // J 7 ij 7.l'~Vi fa7 !"' .~L<: : 7 J'LL `,~, ~~Y Y-~if ~ (.`-~ l..r;~~~~~rW:~~'f-(~~i2-.' ~'~/ 4 ~ i ~ r~ Flease explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the r~oanoke County Comprehensive Plan. C~r~ i'7 ~~i,;)y~ ~/r ~ ~l~(Y~ ~i ~~ rat, t~l /7/~' <~n,'If: ? UIt~ ( ''r11~ , V i !U :` ~~ /\I c.- l tLt i~~ii'li T'~.ir i~ .. ~~f-,., ~ r , _ _ . ~ ~ ~ II ~ i l ~.~ ~ `_ ~ ~ ~ J u ~ _._-- J ( i_{ `' ~~~ ~~~~ 7 ~~ l-~ 14~1.f~.,r.,~.. ;1c,1. j ri, ',)Yt,1 ~~1''f(1r1 r ~ / ~,, J.( i") ;~ ,(: C~~~Y~~ ~ ~~l ~ n j.r1 ~ ~\ `~y ~ 1 '`)t~,.J ,~ .~ -y _~ ~"`)" 'j ,.(: 7 ~ r,~ ., "~ ' r '~ '' ; i r 1 ~`a ~ ` ,l i ~ ~ _- -~ . > i_' !1~.UI tw ~ ~~ `--f-+~.~<~: :' ~ , ~' I~ ':C`L ~' ~' i r 5 . . r __ , f r~ Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and r"acili ties, including water;se~~ver, roads, schools, parks!recreation, and fire rescue. ~~i ~ ' ,t:.'~J~,L(+'; 4;1 < ,-,~;Lt~ n n.i~^! (~f.%t_ J !~ ~~-~'1 lNt~1 ~~'L," '~~ f ~, r Cam,; !Lvi i f~~f ~.,.~. ~ (1 i{: ~r`~ /k-~ ~ `f~ % ~3 °;L ~ ~~ r/r ,J,r ~ ~'~ /1X SLi~L,~irl {~,, >> ~ t -,:, , , ~ , ,~1 ~ r :y~~,~LZC~ f' ~ ! '7 - it L 1 ' ~ ~ ~ ~ J ` ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ' ~ ~~ ~ r"~.r1 ,, ~'%/ ~ {r "t '7 :' / ~~~~ ~ ~. L;(,~ / ~}L •.1 ~~ . , yip ~ .r~ .~1 ~ ~;t ~?, ~ 1GC'". " ,'1 ~J/~~ -~ / ~" ) /~~ i %7 ~ ~. `}r/' %'J/~./ milt r~ S i) :.- _ , . ~L. ~ ~' f l ~ V a' i ~r~w i ~ 5 ~ 9 0 B ~ h B _h ~ ~ a ~ g iy ~ 5 b' ~ E m 3 ~~$ m ~' - z 3 5 ~ 3 # • ,~ ~ ~ ~ a ~, 5, ~t~ fiti{ d~~ ~ ~ O u d ~ S Q ~ n c ~ ~? {v ~E l ~ ~ (} ~~ i1~} ~ N u ~E~~ 4 0 m n ~¢ 0 a Cl ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~`.. iC~ ~ t~+ ~ JS ~~ f Y I~ I~ ® G e "~ dtp ,I$$ ~ ~~ ~ \ ~ ~, '~ \ \1 $ `~b ~ ~ \ ~; W ~• L ~1 8$ ~ ~ z z a 6 1\ • &8p~ '~ +j~+~ Y~ 1~ e ~~~~ }a $~ ~ is f O z U J U_ 2111 nj r H,. Z w ~~', >a yZ~ ^~2 DQ~ a Sx C ~~~ ~. a ~ah ~ ~ ~ ~ 4~~ p°~ ~ gg tl ~d ~ ~ ~ ~ '~s ° @ ~~~ ~ M~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~e~` d ~, z ~, yU N N ~ '~ O ~ 5 V ~ d ~ ~ ~~~~~~ I~~ '~ b G~ W =. ~ ~~I • • • FT - __ o t~ 2p ;0 40 W I (-L IP~ M 5C~ (y rya G'r`'; ~ ~ - -~'-r"-(..! -I~"_~ __ l -_-~~t~TtN~ - ---: _. -UGN~IIIG_,.r-"`~hflD_RR..~_~~)r'~'.^~'~;--Ili ~-__RETts1N11 ~ - ~~ ~~ _ _ _ __ . „0 D~z1VH K ~~ l- f~ t" , ;L ~ ~ ~ _ ~ iQ ~' srt ~ ,~N • vJ ~ i rv W'e'd Q-J :;: - Baca u. ~' -~ ~ t, ~,~ .. w. , , i ; 3~ ~ _ -~1 ly - I ~, ~ 4a ~Rlv~ - li ~ i 1 1~ I I DwA F AN INF, I ~ e, ~ r I D- GR r r_ ,, r ? 5 1°LANTG..SCRIP ~ I r a~f °` r ~ - - Yf- _ r" 7 ~G1,CVEI.,etiyD c~CLBt-'(' PFAR6 ~ D 0 ~ 0 0 - - ,p~l~E ___ X~~~ ROANOIf~' Cfl~INTY' ~~'PARTM.E'NT O.F' GO~MUNITY' D~';lE.L~3PM~'NT I~a~~t Lnvestrr~.ents LLC Specicxl Usa Permit 2~. ~ 1-1-?~t. 1 ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGII~TIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMII~TISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 1999 ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO HASH INVESTMENTS, LLC TO OPERATE A USED AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIP LOCATED AT 7650 WILLIAMSON ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 27.11-1-24.1), HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Hash Investments, LLC has Eled a petition to operate a used automobile dealership located at 7650 Williamson Road (Tax Map No. 27.11-1-24.1) in the Hollins Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 2, 1999; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on February 23, 1999; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on March 23, 1999. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Hash Investments, LLC to operate a used automobile dealership located at 7650 Williamson Road (Tax Map No. 27.11-1-24.1) in the Hollins Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1999 Community Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.2-2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved with the following conditions: 1) Grassed andlor landscaped areas shall remain in their entirety as shown on the conceptual plan. 2) Parking lot lighting shall not exceed 22 feet in height. Poles, posts, light stations and other light details shall be grayish-brown or natural earth tone in color. 3) Freestanding signs shall be limited to one monumental sign, not to exceed 7 feet in height and 10 feet in width. The base shall be constructed of either brick or field stone. Signboard portions shall be made of redwood, southern yellow pine, high-density polyurethane foam cedar, painted steel or aluminum with anodized or baked on color scheme. Lighting, if used, shall be with in-ground units. 4) No portable signs shall be permitted. 5) A minimum of one 12 inch caliper tree for every 10 parking spaces shall be planted on U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\ZONING\HASH.SUP I -'~ site. 6) No more than 65 vehicles for sale will be stored on the site at a time and the vehicles must be parked within designated striped spaces. 7) Existing pine trees at the rear of the property shall remain. 8) Facade signs shall not exceed 5 percent of the area of the facade. 9) No banners exceeding 25 square feet in area, or pennants shall be displayed on the property at any time. 10) A minimum of five parking spaces shall be designated as permanent customer parking spaces. 11) The final site plan shall generally conform with the conceptual site plan and landscape plan drawn by Ted von Dameck and submitted as part of the special use permit process. 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\ZONING\HASH.SUP 2 ~- Y f AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 1999 ORDINANCE 032399-11 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 14.7-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF WILDWOOD ROAD (TAX MAP NOS. 45.01-1-8; 45.01-1-9; 45.01-1-13) IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF AG-1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF WILDWOOD DEVELOPMENT, INC. WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 23, 1999, and the second reading and public hearing were held March 23, 1999; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 2, 1999; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 14.7 acres, as described herein, and located on the west side of Wildwood Road (Tax Map Numbers 45.01-1-8; 45.01-1-9; 45.01-1-13) in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of AG-1, Agricultural/Rural Low Density District, to the zoning classification of R-1, Low Density Residential District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Wildwood Development, Inc. 3. That the owners of the property have voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts: 1 (1) The developer shall grant a storm water management easement along Dry Branch for a potential regional storm water management facility. The easement shall include the 100 year floodway, as designated by FEMA, and the boundaries of the open space parcel as it is generally represented on the concept plan dated March 1, 1999, prepared by T.P. Parker and Son. Actual location of storm water management easement to be based on subdivision map. (2) The developer shall grant a green way easement on the east side of Dry Branch. The width of the easement shall extend from the eastern edge of Dry Branch, at bank full width, toward the new development for a width of 30 feet. (3) The development shall be served by a new public street, with one intersection to Wildwood Road. No new driveway shall connect to Goodwin Avenue or Wildwood Road, with the exception of the lot at the intersection of Wildwood Road and Goodwin Avenue, which does not have frontage on the new public street. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the center of Wildwood Road (Va. Secondary Route 619) with its intersection with the center of Goodwin Avenue (Va. Secondary Route 635); thence following the center of Wildwood Road, S. 39 deg. 21 min. 02 sec. E. 158.54 feet to a point; thence continuing with Wildwood Road, S. 47 deg. 48 min. 30 sec. E. 33.48 feet to a point, corner to the 1.00 acre tract herein described and the adjoining 11.320 acre tract owned by the Estate of Estelle LaPrade Walker; thence with a line between the 1.00 acre tract and the 11.320 acre tract, S. 24 deg. 17 min. 55 sec. W. 486.85 feet to a point in the center of Goodwin Avenue, being also the center of a bridge crossing a creek; thence with the center of Goodwin Avenue, N. 6 deg. 58 min. 49 sec. E. 194.04 feet to a point; thence continuing with the center of Goodwin Avenue, N. 6 deg. 07 min. 39 sec. E. 301.24 feet to a point; thence continuing with the center of Goodwin Avenue and the property herein described, N. 11 deg. 16 min. 15 sec. E. 98.59 feet to the Point of Beginning and being a parcel of land containing 1.00 acres and being Tax Map No. 45.01-1-8. BEGINNING at a point on the west side of Wildwood Road (Va. Secondary Route 619), said point being on the northerly right-of-way line of Interstate 81; thence leaving Wildwood Road and following the northerly right-of-way line of Interstate 81 2 and the 2.409 acre tract herein described, S. 56 deg. 51 min. 22 sec. W. 252.37 feet to a point in the center of a creek, corner to the William E. Lee property; thence following the center of said creek with a line between the Lee property and the property herein described, N. 84 deg. 53 min. 07 sec. W. 155.33 feet to a point; thence continuing up the creek in between said properties, N. 83 deg. 05 min. 33 sec. W. 54.61 feet to a point; thence continuing up said creek, N. 79 deg. 07 min. 27 sec. W. 67.31 feet to a point, corner to the property of the Estate of Estelle LaPrade Walker; thence with a line between the Walker property and the property herein described N. 37 deg. 30 min. 50 sec. E. 539.88 feet to a point on the west side of Wildwood Road; thence with the west side of Wildwood Road and the property herein described, S. 25 deg. 40 min. 00 sec. E. 252.12 feet to a point; thence with a curve to the left whose arc is 96.15 feet and whose radius is 602.96 feet (chord equals S. 30 deg. 14 min. 06 sec. E. 96.05 feet) to the Point of Beginning, and being a parcel of land containing 2.409 acres and being the property of Pamela H. Bell, Roanoke County Tax Map No. 45.01-1-13. BEGINNING at a point in the center of Wildwood Road (Va. Secondary Route 619), said point being the northeasterly corner of the Estate of Estelle LaPrade Walker property and on the line extended of the Pamela H. Bell property; thence leaving said Point of Beginning and following a line between the Walker property and the Bell property, S. 37 deg. 30 min. 50 sec. W. 587.63 feet to a point in the center of the creek on the line of the William E. Lee property; thence generally up the center of the creek, N. 76 deg. 15 min. 10 sec. W. 169.77 feet to a point; thence continuing up the creek, N. 63 deg. 14 min. 26 sec. W. 41.23 feet; thence continuing up the creek between the Lee property and the property herein described, N. 45 deg. 44 min. 20 sec. W. 110.33 feet to a point; thence continuing up the creek, N. 12 deg. 01 min. 52 sec. E., leaving the Lee property, then with the Clyde A. Hartman property and the property herein described, a total of 293.74 feet to a point, corner to the Harry L. Wimmer property; thence with a line between the Wimmer property, then the Aubrey Desper property and the property herein described, N. 5 deg. 28 min. 08 sec. W. 215.00 feet to a point; thence generally up the creek, continuing with the Desper property and the property herein described, N. 44 deg. 23 min. 08 sec. W. 40.00 feet to a point; thence continuing up the creek, N. 63 deg. 18 min. 08 sec. W. 152.00 feet to a point in the center of Goodwin Avenue (Va. Secondary Route 635) and in the center of the bridge; thence leaving Goodwin Avenue with a line between the property herein described and a 1.00 acre tract also owned by the Estate of Estelle LaPrade Walker, N. 24 deg. 17 min. 55 sec. E. 486.85 feet to a point in the center of Wildwood Road (Va. Secondary Route 619); thence with the center of Wildwood Road, S. 47 deg. 48 min. 30 sec. E. 92.46 feet to a point; thence continuing with the property herein described and following the center of Wildwood Road, S. 50 deg. 08 min. 28 sec. E. 207.83 feet to a point; thence continuing with the center of Wildwood Road, S. 47 deg. 43 min. 07 sec. E. 149.55 feet to a point; thence with a curve to the right and following the center of Wildwood Road whose length is 145.74 feet and whose radius is 366.10 feet (chord equals 3 S. 36 deg. 18 min. 51 sec. E. 144.78 feet to a point); thence continuing with the property herein described and the center of Wildwood Road, S. 24 deg. 54 min. 34 sec. E. 220.66 feet to a point; thence continuing to the center of Wildwood Road, S. 23 deg. 55 min. 01 sec. E. 108.31 feet to the Point of Beginning and being a parcel of land containing 11.320 acres, and being Roanoke County Tax Map No. 45.01-1-9. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Harrison to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Terry Harrington, County Planner John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 4 ,~ . ,~ /~48 ~ ~ 7!-i$ ~~ p' ~ a O~ >Reo ~ . ,¢Jo ,~`' 42:~ lefa /~~: °a°- ~' ~,r ~' 41- f;o¢ °'-- jv s.,~ Ac. 41.1' `.r ~ ~ Count o~ o°~ ~~ ~Q O jyr~^'+ l 1 ~ . 'o JJ47 ' 190(5) ~ ,'I 0 r:1 (~} ~ r7 a~ r~~ . 1 1 . $ 7,:.7.7 i ~" o 12. ~ - ¢ ~,~, IJ2Y rni X91 c~ ~ mJ 7306 'D .N ti ~ 0 ~~oO 1'J 83 Te2,8S lT9a '~ JJOJ IJOJ . i 1307 t t . , 793 _,µ ..: 14 'J'J :`:.. .... .._'-. ~:~-': _. ~ I5. . JJIJ 9.2s .4c.(D) 4.08 Ac.(C) 1293 2 r~ rsos rJ0_° /t ~ ~ i- w 3~6(.C) { l3/l / ~, i ~4 s_ y 0 NORTH RDANO~fE' COUNTY DEPAR3'MENT OF CD~MUNITY D~'VELt?P~fENT 2- l ~-k~C WiZdwood Development,dnc. Reaor~,e from AG-! to R-1 45.01->-8, 9, 13 PETITIONER: WILDWOOD DEVELOPMENT ~ ~ t/ CASE NUMBER: 3-2/99 Planning Commission Hearing Date: March 2, 1999 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: March 23, 1999 A. REQUEST Petition of Wildwood Development Inc. to rezone 14.7 acres from AG-1 to R-1 to construct single family detached residences, located on the west side of Wildwood Road, north of I-81, Catawba Magisterial District. (CONT. FROM FEB) B. CITIZEN COMMENTS No citizens spoke C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION Mr. Witt inquired about driveway sight distance at the corner lot at the intersection of Wildwood Road and Goodwin Avenue. The petitioner responded that proposed property lines had been adjusted to align a driveway with Vine Cliff Road. The Commission commended the petitioner for his interest in greenways and stormwater management. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS 1. The developer shall grant a stormwater management easement along Dry Branch for a potential regional stormwater management facility. The easement shall include the 100 year floodway, as designated by FEMA, and the boundaries of the open space parcel as it is generally represented on the concept plan dated March, 1, 1999, prepared by T.P. Parker and Son. Actual location of stormwater management easement to be based on subdivision map. 2. The developer shall grant a greenway easement on the east side of Dry Branch. The width of the easement shall extend from the eastern edge of Dry Branch, at bank full width, toward the new development for a width of 30 feet. 3. The development shall be served by a new public street, with one intersection to Wildwood Road. No new driveway shall connect to Goodwin Avenue or Wildwood Road, with the exception of the lot at the intersection of Wildwood Road and Goodwin Avenue, which does not have frontage on the new public road. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Ms. Hooker moved to recommend approval of the The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Thomason, Witt, Robinson, Hooker NAYS: None ABSENT: Ross F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: petition with proffered conditions. _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report Other Terrance arri ton, S etary Roanoke C my Plan ing Commission S- ~~ ~J~m~` The owners do hereby voluntarily proffer the following conditions: 1. The developer shall grant a stormwater management easement along Dry Branch for a potential regional stormwater management facility. The easement shall include the 100 yeaz floodway, as designated by FBN1A, and the boundaries of the open space parcel as it is generally represented on the concept plan dated March 1, 1999, prepared by T.P. Parker and Son. Actual location of stormwater management easement to be based on subdivision map. 2. The developer shall grant a greenway easement on the east side of Dry $ranch. Tl~e width of the easement shall extend from the eastern edge of Dry Branch, at bank full width, toward the new development for a width of 30 feet. 3. The development shall be served by a new public street, with one intersection to Wildwood Road. No new driveway shall connect to Goodwin Avenue or Wildwood Road, wish the exception of the lot at the intersection of Wildwood Road and Goodwin Avenue, which does not have frontage on the new public road. _ ~ i'~~ ~~`~~~ Owner, tax parcel # 45.01-1-8,9 ~ ~~/y~ Date n ~. Y ~~,~ ~~ ~~4 ~ Owner, tax parcel # 45.01-1-13 3 ~ 3 ~~ ~ °I Date . ~ "- "~ e~ ~ ~ x ~ ~~ ~ ~' _ r a ~ ` 1~ ~ 11 I _, ' , I , n I ,.; . ~. ~,. i ~ ~,.. o ~ ~ ^~•a~::. .:f • 1 j a 2 / \\ \~ ~ ':~. ~ ; I ` ~ ~371tld01 A7M! 3101iI ,,^ ~ i ~I _ / ~ 1 ~ ~ I y~ ~ Ju~1y~~.1~09~-~'Op«~kY1lvW •?•ei•, / / __ ii M ~ i~ wlwhll 1 /~aa• H v / ~. 'S~ ~ / ~ !~ !D AlIBr01N \ ~ 1 i x \ ~i :. ~~ \ ~ ~~~ ice/ ~, \ . 3 ~ ~ i~ o '~~~t • ! ~ ~ ~ ~ >;:: O~ ~ ~ UNKS VIEW ~ / ;> ' a'' ~ ~. i ~ ~ i ~ a ~ , c_n Zvi x ~ ~ °' ~ .~ °~k,,'-, , ~~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ' ~~ ~ OWe~ ~~ ~ '~ ~~ ~ ~ 8$ ~ ~ vi ~~ Q p a °' / ~ ~A ~~~0 ..7~ a ~~ ~ as ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ , W ~oq~ ~~ E.; ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ J o W ~ ~ ~ ~ _ . ~~~~~ o Q V zZ L w Qq ~~ 'Q..7 ~ /Qy /may Q ~ (n (n !n ~~omooo~~ ., 4 `. V 3~q~ ~~ ~ wOW 3`~`~~W~O ~y~ ~` ~Z ~~ F- p Q ~t,! U Z ti ~ - m m li w 3f :'~ 25 Q W '• ~ Z W r>~~~oo~r'u~ `~~ /~ ~ii / V~ ~ ~ ~ W W W Z ~p O W Q ~ ~ V ~ Q ~ ~ LL Q NV1~~~C WN«3 4!~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~~mNN~ ~$~ x~ W (n Q. ~wna~nwa 5 < i- STAFF RIJPURT ,. t~ PIJTITI~1~dER: Wildwood Development PRI;I'AR1JD fl'Y: David l~olladav CASF NIJT~'IDEI2: 3-2/99 DATF: March 2, 1999 PART' I A. E~C'(JTIVF Sf11~/IIdIAR~' 'T'his is a request to rezone 14.7 acres, at the intersection of Goodwin Avenue and Wildwood Road, from AG1 to R1 for single family residential development. The site is designated l~leighborhood Conservation in the Roanoke County Community Plan. The property has been identified as a desirable location for a regional stormwater management facility in the Roanoke Valley Regional Stormwater l~'Ianagement Plan. In addition, Dry branch, which flows through the property, has been identified as a desirable greenway corridor in the Roanoke Valley greenway Plan. 'The proposed development is consistent with the policies and guidelines of the Roanoke County Community Plan, as well as the Roanoke Valley Regional Stormwater iVlanagement Plan, and the Roanoke Valley Greenway Plan. B. DESCRIPTI~01~I Wildwood Development Corporation petitions to rezone 14,7 acres from AGl to Rl for single family residential development. A 38 lot subdivision, served by a new public street, is proposed. The developers have chosen the zero lot line option for lot design and home location on the lots. The property is located at the intersection of Goodwin Avenue and Wildwood Road, in the Catawba Magisterial District. At the time of this report, a signed proffer statement has not been received. Staff and the developer have discussed the following proffers: The developer shall grant a stormwater management easement along Dry Branch for a potential regional Stormwater management facility. The easement shall include the 100 year floodway, as designated by FEMA, and the boundaries of the open space parcel as it is generally represented on the concept plan dated December 15, 1998, prepared by T.P. Parker and Son. 2. The developer shall grant a greenway easement on the east side of Dry Branch. The width of the easement shall extend from the eastern edge of Dry Branch, at bank full width, toward the new development for a width of 30 feet. 3. The development shall be served by a new public street, with one intersection to Wildwood Road. All netiv lots shall have driveway access only to the new public street. No new driveway shall connect to Goodwin Avenue or Wildwood Road. ~. ~PP~~C~B~~ ;E~~'UI,A~T~C~l`aiS ._ Single family residential development, zero lot line option, is allowed by right in the R1 zoning district. Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) approval is required for the rLetiv public street and all new driveway entrance permits. Site development review by Roanoke County staff is required. PARS' II A. ANNA;( YS;[S ®F ~~IS';'IN~ CflN~3I~'I®1~S Back round Roanoke Valley Regional Stormwater Management Plan The property is identified in the Roanoke Valley Regional Stormwater Management Plan as a desirable site for a regional stormwater management facility. Efforts to detain flood water on Dry Branch would help mitigate flooding problems downstream in the City of Salem. The City of Salem Engineering Department was contacted for comments on the proposed development. They asked Dewberry and Davis, consulting engineers, to reevaluate the models from the Regional Stormwater Management Plan, to determine if, in fact, the proposed pond would produce desired benefits. Citing feasibility problems because the optimum pond level would inundate Wildwood Road, Dewberry and Davis engineers recommended that the City of Salem study further the proposed ponds on other identified sites on Dry Branch and its tributaries. Even though the consultants acknowledged feasibility problems of a structure on the site, Roanoke County engineering staff have recommended that the developer designate a stormwater management easement around the open space area shown on the concept plan. Having the easement would reserve some area along Dry Branch if some other methods of stormwater management became feasible in the future. In addition, simply having the stream bank preserved in its existing state would achieve much of the overall intent of the Roanoke Valley Regional Stormwater Management Plan by leaving the natural system intact, and by keeping most of the development out of the floodplain. Salem engineering staff have indicated that they may approach the developer to discuss alternatives for stormwater management. Roanoke Valley Greemvay Plan The Dry Branch stream corridor is identified as a potential off-road pedestrian/bicycle facility in the Roanoke Valley Greenway Plan. The developer has indicated a willingness to proffer a geenway easement along the eastern side of Dry Branch. The width of the easement would extend 30 feet from the eastern edge of Dry Branch, at bank fizll width, toward the new development. . .~ Topo~raphy/VegPtation -The property slopes down to the southwest from Wildwood Road toward Dry Branch. The floodway and floodplain of Dry Branch cover the southern portion of the property as shown on the concept plan. Dry Branch flows along the southern boundary of the site. Across Dry Branch, the topography of the adjoining property rises up a steep bank. With the exception of some trees along Dry Branch and arotmd the existing homes, the property is primarily open pasture. Surrounding Neighborhood -Properties to the northeast, across Wildwood Road, located in Roanoke County and the City of Salem, are zoned Rl Residential, and contain existing single family residences, as well as new houses under construction. Wildwood Forest subdivision, in the City of Salem, and Vine Cliff subdivision, in Roanoke County, are both new residential subdivisions currently under construction. New streets serving these subdivisions are directly across Wildwood Road from the petitioner's site. To the southeast is Interstate Rt. 81. On the southeast side of I-81 are single family homes in the City of Salem. Property to the west and southwest, in Roanoke County, is zoned AG1, and contain single family residences. Property to the northwest, across Goodwin Avenue in Roanoke County, is also zoned AGl with single family residences. B. Al!'A~,~S~S QyN' P12dOPOSE~ I9EVlEL®P1dIlEl`dT Site Lavout/Architecture -The petitioner proposes to construct a 38 lot subdivision, to be served by a new public street. The new street would intersect Wildwood Road across from Waldheim Road, and tern7inate at a cul-de-sac. As currently shown on the concept plan, all new driveway entraizces would be from the new public street, with the exception of a proposed lot at the intersection of Goodwin Avenue and Wildwood Road. This corner lot has no frontage on the new public street. Roanoke County engineering staff and VDOT staff have commented that this lot is not desirable due to poor sight distance on both streets. Roanoke County engineering staff and VDOT staff have also commented that no new driveways for this subdivision would be allowed on Wildwood Road or Goodwin Avenue. The zero lot line option is proposed. With this option, one side yard setback may equal zero. Reduced lot area, and reduced front and rear yard setbacks are also allowed. The developer plans to incorporate two existing homes into the subdivision design. No architectural sketches of the new homes have been submitted. The developer plans to create a separate 4.4+ acre parcel to remain as open space. This lot would include the floodway and majority of the floodplain of Dry Branch. The area could be used for stormwater management for the subdivision. Maintenance of the parcel would be the responsibility of the property owner or homeowners' association. As mentioned above, staff and the developer have discussed a proffer to include the open space lot in a stormwater management easement, to help achieve the goals of the Roanoke Valley Regional Stormwater Management Plan. A proffer has also been discussed which would designate a 30 foot wide greenway easement through the open space parcel. Access/Traffic Circulation - As mentioned above, the site will be served by a single new public `S street, intersecting with Wildwood Road. The new public street would terminate in a cul-de-sac, and would not connect to Goodwin Avenue. Controlled access to Wildwood Road, with all new driveways connecting to the new street, would be required by Roanoke County engineering staff and VDOT staff. The concept plan shows additional right of way to be dedicated to Wildwood Road and Goodwin Avenue. Exact dimensions of the additional right of way would be determined during plan review. The most recent draft Interstate 81 Improvement Study, November 1998, shows no additional right-of--way acquisition planned for the section of I-81 which borders the site. However, VDOT staff have commented that "All parties should be aware of the potential for additional right-of- way for the proposed widening of Route I-81 which may effect this property". VDOT staff have also commented that they would not pursue additional right-of--way at this time. If additional right-of--way is needed in the future, the site has ample space for right-of--way acquisition. Roanoke County engineering staff have commented that these new homes may not qualify for the noise abatement program during widening of I-81. 1994 VDOT traffic counts in the vicinity are as follows: S h~e et Rt 635, Goodwin Av Rt 619, Wildwood Rd Rt 619, Wildwood Rd From Salem Corp. Limits Rt 733, Richland Hills Dr Rt 635, Goodwin Av To Rt 619, Wildwood Rd Rt 635, Goodwin Av Salem Corp. Limits Vehicles Per Dav 1078 1386 1169 Utilities -Public water service is available to the site. The North Loop water transmission line serves the site and nearby new subdivisions. Sanitary sewer service is available from the City of Salem. C. C(~NF(~R1dIANC>E WITI~ R®AN®KE C®IJNTY C~MMITl`dITY ALAN The proposed development is consistent with the general policies for the Glenvar Community Planning Area. Natural resources policies for the Glenvar Community Planning Area discourage development from occurring on environmentally sensitive and natural hazard areas within the community. Public facility policies encourage cooperation with the City of Salem in the provision of public services. The Glenvar Community Planning Area, Future Land Use Map designates the area as Neighborhood Conservation. The proposed development is consistent with the neighborhood conservation land use designation. The neighborhood conservation designation is "a future land use area where established single family neighborhoods are delineated and the conservation of the existing development pattern is encouraged". Land use types of a density that is similar, or reasonably higher than surrounding neighborhoods are encouraged. The proposal also is consistent with the land use determinants for the neighborhood conservation designation. s_y ~. c~~1~®~A~C~ ~~T~~~~~T~~~~~~~~1~~»T ~~~»~~~ As proposed on the concept plan, the development appears to have ample space to be designed in conformance with development standards. Site development review is required to ensure compliance with all applicable standards. PAST III A. STA~'1F CC~I'v~C'L~TS~aQl~IS The location and density of the proposed development is consistent with the general policies of the Glenvar Community Planning Area, as well as the guidelines of the Neighborhood Conservation land use designation. A large area of open space, in the floodway and floodplain of Dry Branch, is proposed to remain undeveloped. This is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Roanoke Valley Stormwater Management Plan. Regardless of whether or not a regional stormwater management facility is constricted on the site, leaving the streambank, floodway, and most of the floodplain intact is a primary objective of the plan. At the time of this report, a signed proffer statement has not been received. As mentioned above, staff and the developer have discussed proffers designating easements for stormwater management and greenways, and limiting access to the development. With the added benerit of the above mentioned proffered conditions, staff suggests a favorable recommendation to the Board of Supervisors. '87-1413 ~HN I 38 uuy ~e Reaidenuni & Cornmer:inl _ FOr Slar"f US@ O/]lV .~» _,.. ~' ,' _ I~UHI~U~.I= dater ei e ~,~, received 5y `' °`°.~•---.- ' ~ ~x K ~= .~ , N N I N v A. N» Z 0 N 11~:G ~ ~~~.•~~~® ~~~ ~~~~ application.,` , ~ PClBZA date ~- ~ 'iu~'1~~~~~ ~ r . .. ~~ - ~ ~ ~ _ 'P.O.BO:C 1253 .SALEM, VA24153 placards issued:~?`'~ SOS dace; /' ~ 389- 1191 - . X01 8 ..SNAVELr' -~~C ,, IRV[NL.WEBSTER FAn (5~-i0) ]%2-2'QH Case Numb.. r. :,~..-....r, r'-~' ~ ,.._ 5 f ~- ~ G ~s 5 ~ ' 3 60 ~ ~ 40 ;~ 387-0556 - ;=,~- `. . ..'r' ..: -.: .~; .~: 1. ~*: Checi~ type of application flied (check all that apply}: C-Xi P,EZONII`!G ^ SPECIAL USE ^VARIANCE Applicant's name: Wildwood Development, Inc. c/o Mr, Gary Huffman Phone: 387-7193 Address: 1507 Ashley Drive, Salem, VA ~ Zip Code: 24153 Owner's name: Wildwood Development Inc. Contract Purchaser Phone: 387-7193 Address: 1507 Ashley Drive, Salem, VA Zip Code:24153 Location of property: Wildwood Road, North of I-81, west Tax Map Number: 45.01-1-8, 9 & 13 side of road Magisterial District: Catawba Community Planning Area: Glenvar Size of parcel ;s): Existing Zoning: AG-1 14.7 acres Existing Land Use: Two single family residences, cemetery & sq.ft. Pasture ::'.1~.•'. i i ~i :: i i; ? i i l i i is i is t is i~;:;;;? ; i i: i i Y? is i i; '. ~;::::::i:i~i:~: ;ii •ii~iii !~ :~ii ii ii ii?liti?iiii~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~iiiii~ll`iiiii • . , :~: ~; Proposed Zoning: R_1 - s • : Proposed Land Usa: Single family residential (detached) Fo~ raff Use On/y Use Type: Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES X NO 1F N0, A VARIANCE 1S REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parce! meet the minimum criteria for thre requested Use Type? YE5 X NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. ~ _ If rezoning request, are conditions being proriered with this request? YE5 NO :~;: ~` ~"' Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order .to: r~ ~,~e appncation compete? 'tease check if enclosed. APPL)CATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ws v cvs v Consultation X 8 1 /2" x 1 1" concept plan X Application X ;>. Metes and bounds description X Justification ~~. X '~~ Water and sewer application See available letter 98-203A l hereb y certify that l am either the owner of the property or the on am acting with fhe knowledge and consent of the owner. Gwner's Signature: Fvs v X Application fee ::, . ='< Profrers, if appiicaofe Adjoining propery owners 'Her's agent or contract purchaser and ~S'~'~F~4Cr~T~~N FAR RE~~N~1`~idG ~~J~S'1' PROPOSED "WALKER ME~.DOWS" SUBDIVISION WILDWOOD DEVELOPhIENT, LLC Please e.~plain how the -request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the zoning ordinance: The proposal is consistent with the stated density of 1 to 3 units per acre contained in the purpose of the R-1 residential district. Properties on Wildwood road in this vicinity are currently 'oeing developed with similar densities of single family detached dwellings, notably Vine Cliff Estates (Roanoke County). and Wildwood Forest (City of Salem). The surrounding area is expected to continue to develop in this manner now that public water and se~,uer have been extended to the area. The proposal will provide quality, affordable housing for a number of families within short driving distance of the commercial and industrial areas of Salem and surrounding areas. This will help to avoid increased traffic congestion due to Long commutes that result from more outlying residential subdivisions. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke Cozrniy Comprehensive Plan: The proposed project is in keeping with the developing nature of the surrounding area. Although this area was once primarily agricultural and forest land, it is evolving toward loty density residential. This is evidenced by the surrounding residential subdivisions named above and recent extensions of pubiic water and sewer to the area. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on pzrblic services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and ftre,~rescue: The development of this parcel is expected to have only a minor impact on the adjoining properties and surrounding area. Careful planning, architecture, and the following design features will help to minimize the impact: 1) Approximately 4.4 acres along Dry Branch will remain undeveloped. This area will provide open space for recreation and visual buffering for the properties across Dry Branch to the west. 2) The developer proposes to extend public water to the site from Wildwood Road. With the recent extension of the "North Loop" water main to the vicinity, adequate water service capacity is available to serve this area. Please see County availability letter # 98-203A dated Oct. 19, 1998 (copy enclosed) for more information. .s _ y 3) The developer proposes to extend public sanitary sewer to the site from the intersection of Wildwood Road and Waldheim Road. As this proposed connection is to the City of Salem sewer system, the City will be asked to verify capacity in their system to receive the additional waste~~ater. 4) This de;lelopment would result in a small increase in stormwater runoff rates. This increase will be very small when compared to runoff rates for Dry Branch. Measures to lessen the effects of this increase will be provided for during the site plan review process. 5) Portions of the property are located within the 100-year floodplain. Attention will be given during the planning and construction phases of the project to ensure that proposed residences are constructed according to County regulations to minimize the risk of flooding. 6) Wildwood Road would be impacted by the proposed development. A slight increase in traffic volume will result. Traffic hazards are minimized, however, by the proposal to construct only one new entrance on Wildwood Road. The proposed new road is designed to provide adequate sight distance for traffic entering or exiting the proposed road. 7) The proposal to widen Interstate 31, no~T in the planning stages, would have a minor impact on this site. 3) Impacts on schools, parks/recreation, and fire/rescue, and other County ser~~ices by this project are expected to be minor. :1rchltct,r,, 33UL Arlin ~?on Rnulpv~rd w,rt.;tleerr; r azz~'a~, vA 'l.'03I-4666 Planners 7U3 849-U) 00 1' ax iU3 34,x-t11.0~ >ur~, ~,~ ura S-~~ February 19, 1999 tier. George Simpson Assistant Diroo-tor County of Roanoke Department of Engineering and Inspections P.O. Box 29$00 Roanoke; Virginia 2018-0798 Dear George: As requested by yourself and Jay Taliaferro of the City of Salem, I have looked at the identified pond sites in the upper Dr? Branch Watershed above Interstate 81 to dett~triine whether Pond DRY03 is critical to the Regional Stornwater L~Ianagement Pla.*t. The Roanoke Valley Regional Storxt~~vater ~1an.agement plan included the e~laluation of four pond sites on Dry Branch above I-81. Pond DRY 08 had feasibility problems be:;ause of the Wildwood Road unde~ass of ?-81 as stated ir. Section 2.5 of the report. Pond DRY02 was not recommended as staled in Section 3.6 of the report. Ponds DRYO? and DRY03 are feasible sates. We have revielaed our calculations and have deternined that the combinations of Ponds DRY01 and DRYO~ results in flow reduction benefits downstream that are comparable to the reduction provided by Pond DRY08. The cost estimate prepared for Pond DRY08 does not include costs associated with the Wildwcod Road underpass at I-81 which would si~nifcantly increase the cost. Therefore, we recommend that Ponds DRY01 and DRY03 be explored for s:oniwater management in the Dry Branch watershed. With regard to Pond DRY01, if the location shown on Figure 2.0.1 is a problem, 1 would recommend that you look for an alternative location immediately downstream of the identified site. Moving the pond upstream results in capturing less area and a loss of floodp]ain benefits. With regard to pond DRYO j, the pond site could be moved immediately upstream or dew~nstream of the location identified on Figure 2.5.1 without substantially affecting the drainage area and negatively affecting the benefits on floodplain management. In summary we do not recommend Ponds DRY08 and DRY02. Vv'e recommend fur~her study on Ponds DRY01 and DRYO ~ . Vil'Sioi;, \~laryi:uul ~orlh t:umllrta (:ailw ni„ 1, t~rrl'i,t i\e,~• f~t~ey iV C`i~ Y!,rk Cnnnec acut NISCSaCnusrt t~ 1~-.nnsylvvni~ ~I~r. as Q'nl_iwma . ~ Mr_ George Simpson February 19, 1999 . Page 2 If you have any further questions please give me a call at 703-3~9-05~~. Sincerely, e~(~er~~. ~av's r,a~vard G. eaden.kopf 9 Senior Associate Cc: Mr. Jay Taliaferro, l?.E., City Engineez, City of Salem S- Lf OPAL F.~~ ROr~NOK~' COUNTY' DE.PART1{1ENT O~n CO~~l2'UNITY D~'V~'LC~'M~NT Witd~.uood Devetopment,Inc. Rezone from AG-> to R-1 45.0-1-8, 9, 93 ~. ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 1999 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 14.7-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF WILDWOOD ROAD (TAX MAP NOS. 45.01-1-8; 45.01-1-9; 45.01-1-13) IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF AG-1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF WILDWOOD DEVELOPMENT, INC. WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 23, 1999, and the second reading and public hearing were held March 23, 1999; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 2, 1999; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 14.7 acres, as described herein, and located on the west side of Wildwood Road (Tax Map Numbers 45.01-1-8; 45.01-1-9; 45.01-1-13) in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of AG-1, Agricultural/Rural Low Density District, to the zoning classification of R-1, Low Density Residential District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Wildwood Development, Inc. 3. That the owners of the property have voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts: (1) The developer shall grant a storm water management easement along Dry Branch for a potential regional storm water management facility. The easement shall include the 100 year floodway, as designated by FEMA, and the boundaries of the open space parcel as it is generally represented on the concept plan dated March 1, 1999, prepared by T.P. Parker and Son. Actual U:\W PDOCS\AGENDA\ZONING\W ILDW OOD.RZN ~~ location of storm water management easement to be based on subdivision map. (2) The developer shall grant a green way easement on the east side of Dry Branch. The width of the easement shall extend from the eastern edge of Dry Branch, at bank full width, toward the new development for a width of 30 feet. (3) The development shall be served by a new public street, with one intersection to Wildwood Road. No new driveway shall connect to Goodwin Avenue or Wildwood Road, with the exception of the lot at the intersection of Wildwood Road and Goodwin Avenue, which does not have frontage on the new public street. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the center of Wildwood Road (Va. Secondary Route 619) with its intersection with the center of Goodwin Avenue (Va. Secondary Route 635); thence following the center of Wildwood Road, S. 39 deg. 21 min. 02 sec. E. 158.54 feet to a point; thence continuing with Wildwood Road, S. 47 deg. 48 min. 30 sec. E. 33.48 feet to a point, corner to the 1.00 acre tract herein described and the adjoining 11.320 acre tract owned by the Estate of Estelle LaPrade Walker; thence with a line between the 1.00 acre tract and the 11.320 acre tract, S. 24 deg. 17 min. 55 sec. W. 486.85 feet to a point in the center of Goodwin Avenue, being also the center of a bridge crossing a creek; thence with the center of Goodwin Avenue, N. 6 deg. 58 min. 49 sec. E. 194.04 feet to a point; thence continuing with the center of Goodwin Avenue, N. 6 deg. 07 min. 39 sec. E. 301.24 feet to a point; thence continuing with the center of Goodwin Avenue and the properly herein described, N. 11 deg. 16 min. 15 sec. E. 98.59 feet to the Point of Beginning and being a parcel of land containing 1.00 acres and being Tax Map No. 45.01-1-8. BEGINNING at a point on the west side of Wildwood Road (Va. Secondary Route 619), said point being on the northerly right-of--way line of Interstate 81; thence leaving Wildwood Road and following the northerly right-of--way line of Interstate 81 and the 2.409 acre tract herein described, S. 56 deg. 51 min. 22 sec. W. 252.37 feet to a point in the center of a creek, corner to the William E. Lee property; thence following the center of said creek with a line between the Lee property and the property herein described, N. 84 deg. 53 min. 07 sec. W. 155.33 feet to a point; thence continuing up the creek in between said properties, N. 83 deg. OS min. 33 sec. W. 54.61 feet to a point; thence continuing up said creek, N. 79 deg. 07 min. 27 sec. W. 67.31 feet to a point, corner to the property of the Estate of Estelle LaPrade Walker; thence with a line between the Walker property and the property herein described N. 37 deg. 30 min. 50 sec. E. 539.88 feet to a point on the west side of Wildwood Road; thence with the west side of Wildwood Road and the property herein described, S. 25 deg. 40 min. 00 sec. E. 252.12 feet to a point; thence with a curve to the left whose arc is 96.15 feet and whose radius is 602.96 feet (chord equals S. 30 deg. 14 min. 06 sec. E. 96.05 feet) to the Point of Beginning, and being a parcel of land containing 2.409 acres and being U:\ WPDOCS\AGENDA\ZONING\W ILDWOOD.RZN the property of Pamela H. Bell, Roanoke County Tax Map No. 45.01-1-13. BEGINNING at a point in the center of Wildwood Road (Va. Secondary Route 619), said point being the northeasterly corner of the Estate of Estelle LaPrade Walker property and on the line extended of the Pamela H. Bell property; thence leaving said Point of Beginning and following a line between the Walker property and the Bell property, S. 37 deg. 30 min. 50 sec. W. 587.63 feet to a point in the center of the creek on the line of the William E. Lee property; thence generally up the center of the creek, N. 76 deg. 15 min. 10 sec. W. 169.77 feet to a point; thence continuing up the creek, N. 63 deg. 14 min. 26 sec. W. 41.23 feet; thence continuing up the creek between the Lee property and the property herein described, N. 45 deg. 44 min. 20 sec. W. 110.33 feet to a point; thence continuing up the creek, N. 12 deg. O1 min. 52 sec. E., leaving the Lee property, then with the Clyde A. Hartman property and the property herein described, a total of 293.74 feet to a point, corner to the Harry L. Wimmer property; thence with a line between the Wimmer property, then the Aubrey Desper property and the property herein described, N. 5 deg. 28 min. OS sec. W. 215.00 feet to a point; thence generally up the creek, continuing with the Desper property and the property herein described, N. 44 deg. 23 min. 08 sec. W. 40.00 feet to a point; thence continuing up the creek, N. 63 deg. 18 min. 08 sec. W. 152.00 feet to a point in the center of Goodwin Avenue (Va. Secondary Route 635) and in the center of the bridge; thence leaving Goodwin Avenue with a line between the property herein described and a 1.00 acre tract also owned by the Estate of Estelle LaPrade Walker, N. 24 deg. 17 min. 55 sec. E. 486.85 feet to a point in the center of Wildwood Road (Va. Secondary Route 619); thence with the center of Wildwood Road, S. 47 deg. 48 min. 30 sec. E. 92.46 feet to a point; thence continuing with the property herein described and following the center of Wildwood Road, S. 50 deg. 08 min. 28 sec. E. 207.83 feet to a point; thence continuing with the center of Wildwood Road, S. 47 deg. 43 min. 07 sec. E. 149.55 feet to a point; thence with a curve to the right and following the center of Wildwood Road whose length is 145.74 feet and whose radius is 366.10 feet (chord equals S. 36 deg. 18 min. 51 sec. E. 144.78 feet to a point); thence continuing with the property herein described and the center of Wildwood Road, S. 24 deg. 54 min. 34 sec. E. 220.66 feet to a point; thence continuing to the center of Wildwood Road, S. 23 deg. 55 min. O1 sec. E. 108.31 feet to the Point of Beginning and being a parcel of land containing 11.320 acres, and being Roanoke County Tax Map No. 45.01-1-9. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\ZONING\WILDWOOD.RZN -•, ~' .~,..~ ,,...~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 1999 ORDINANCE 032399-12 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 11.66-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 925 NORTH ELECTRIC .ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 36.15-1-11) IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2, CONDITIONAL, TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2, AND GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A 160 FOOT CELLULAR MONOPOLE TOWER, UPON THE APPLICATION OF TRITON PCS, INC. (PINKERTON CHEVROLET) WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 23, 1999, and the second reading and public hearing were held March 23, 1999; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on February 2, 1999; and reconsidered the matter on March 16, 1999; and reviewed the Findings of Fact which are attached to this ordinance as Exhibit 1; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board concurs in the Findings of Fact attached to this ordinance as Exhibit 1; and 2. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 11.66 acres, as described herein, and located at 925 North Electric Road (Tax Map Number 36.15-1-11) in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District, with conditions, to the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District, with amended conditions. 1 3. That this action is taken upon the application of Triton PCS, Inc. 4. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Triton PCS, Inc. to construct a 160 foot cellular monopole tower to be located on a 11.66-acre tract of real estate located at 925 North Electric Road (Tax Map No. 36.15-1-11) in the Catawba Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1999 Community Plan pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.2-2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved with the following conditions: 1) Only a monopole broadcasting tower design with 9 Panel antennas shall be permitted. 2) The final site development plan shall generally conform with the "Land Survey" site plan prepared by Atlantis Group, Inc. on October 15, 1998. 3) .The tower structure, antenna, and all attached support hardware shall be a flat matted color so as to better blend into the landscape and reduce visibility and light reflection. In addition, any other accessory structures and fencing shall be of a material and color that blends into the landscape, reducing visibility and light reflection. 4) The 1500 square foot area shall be either enclosed with a 8' high wood privacy fence or evergreen shrubs a minimum of 6' in height shall be planted around the chain link fenced area screening it from surrounding views. 5) No lighting shall be installed on the tower structure or equipment building except for security lighting not to exceed a height of 25 feet in height, except as may be required by the FAA or other governmental or regulatory agency. 6) The tower shall be structurally designed to carry sufficient loading, and the site have the potential to accommodate the additional 2 ( ~ equipment necessary for at least three other vendors/providers of communications services, in order to minimize the proliferation of towers in the vicinity of this site. In addition, by executing the special use permit requested, the applicant agrees to make the tower available for lease within the structural capacity of the tower and at reasonable costs adequate to recover the capital, operating and maintenance costs of the tower location required for the additional capacity. 7) If the use of the tower structure for wireless communications is discontinued, the tower structure shall be dismantled and removed from the site within 30 days of notice by the County and the special use permit shall become void. 5. That in 1984 rezoning of this property the owner of the property voluntarily proffered in writing the following condition which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, accepted and the Petitioner/Owner is now requesting be removed: (1) 6. That said real estate is more fully described as all of Tax Map No. 36.15-1-11 containing 11.66 acres. 7. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. 3 On motion of Supervisor Harrison to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~•C~~~v Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Terry Harrington, County Planner John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 4 . , Y ~ ~~ ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FINDINGS OF FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS arc , PETITION: Triton PCS, Inc. Pinkerton Site FILE NO.: 4 - 2/99 Findings of Fact: Supporting Approval of the Tower: Exhibit 1 1. The proposed tower is not located on the ridge line of a prominent mountain, within a critical viewshed of the Blue Ridge Parkway or Appalachian Trail, or adjacent to an area designated as being an area of historic, ecological, or cultural importance. 2. The telecommunications facility provides the opportunity for the co-location of three other providers. 3. The proposed tower site is currently served by existing roads and utilities. __ PETITIONER: TRITON PCS, INC. CASE NUMBER: 4-2/99 Planning Commission Hearing Date: February 2, 1999 and March 16, 1999 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: March 23, 1999 A. REQUEST Petition of Triton PCS (Pinkerton Chevrolet) to rezone 11.66 acres from C-2 conditional to C-2 conditional to amend the existing condition and obtain a Special Use Permit to construct a 160 foot cellular monopole tower, located at 925 North Electric Road, Catawba Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION Previous discussion included: from a land use perspective it would have been helpful if applicant had shown different heights for the tower; we take a lot of pride in our area and giving up rural land with pristine views will create a trend; we don't won't another "Poor Mountain pin cushion." Mr. Witt said a good reason has not been shown as to why a lower height was not shown. The Commission expressed concern that the tower is so tall and obnoxious and that applicant has not exhausted all other opportunities for location or co-location in this area. Other Commission comments were whether it will be feasible for other companies to co-locate on the pole, since they will have to attach their antennas below Triton's, and whether raising the height of the tower on Red Lane would allow a lower tower height at this location. Ms. Hooker noted the following: the height of the tower greatly concerns me; has Triton considered a series of smaller towers (antennas); the area is rural in nature, may set a precedent for additional towers and antenna; still not convinced there are not other possibilities/alternatives. D. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS 1) Only a monopole broadcasting tower design with 9 Panel antennas shall be permitted. 2) The final site development plan shall generally conform with the "Land Survey" site plan prepared by Atlantis Group, Inc. on October 15, 1998. 3) The tower structure, antenna, and all attached support hardware shall be a flat matted color so as to better blend into the landscape and reduce visibility and light reflection. In addition, any other accessory structures and fencing shall be of a material and color that blends into the landscape, reducing visibility and light reflection. 4) The 1500 square foot area shall be either enclosed with a 8' high wood privacy fence or evergreen shrubs a minimum of 6' in height shall be planted around the chain link fenced area screening it from surrounding views. 5) No lighting shall be installed on the tower structure or equipment building except for security lighting not to exceed a height of 25 feet in height, except as may be required by the FAA or other governmental or regulatory agency. 2 6) The tower shall be structurally designed to carry sufficient loading, and the site have the potential to accommodate the additional equipment necessary for at least three other vendorsJproviders of communications services, in order to minimize the proliferation of towers in the vicinity of this site. In addition, by executing the special use permit requested, the applicant agrees to make the tower available for lease within the structural capacity of the tower and at reasonable costs adequate to recover the capital, operating and maintenance costs of the tower location required for the additional capacity. 7) If the use of the tower structure for wireless communications is discontinued, the tower structure shall be dismantled and removed from the site within 30 days of notice by the County and the special use permit shall become void. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Ms. Hooker moved to recommend denial of the rezoning petition for the following reasons: 1) The 419 Frontage Development Plan incorporated as part of the Community Plan adopted by the Board of Supervisors on January 12, 1999, states in its list of goals to protect natural scenic features, including views, to the maximum extent possible and recognize these as amenities to development. 2) The towers proposed height of 160' is significantly greater than surrounding land forms and structures. Because of its height and topographic location, the tower would be visible from many surrounding areas, especially within a 2 mile radius. 3) The proposed tower site is adjacent to and will be highly visible form surrounding established single family residential and rural residential areas. 4) The proposed tower site is located along a section of Rt. 419 that provides rural views and vistas of surrounding mountains and fields in all directions. Mr. Witt pointed out that the Commission has resisted efforts from our own Economic Development staff in their attempt to construct 100 foot signs along I-81 for advertising and for this reason I will support the motion for denial. The motion for denial carried with the following roll call voter AYES: Thomason, Witt, Robinson, Hooker NAYS: Ross ABSENT: None Ms. Hooker moved to recommend denial of the Special Use Permit. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Thomason, Witt, Robinson, Hooker NAYS: Ross ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE Mr. Ross commented as follows: at this particular location it is reasonably compatible with the general area, there are not a lot of alternative sites (buildings) available, the applicant has complied with everything in regard to the request; I would hope the other members would, if it's just a matter of height, consider what an appropriate height should be. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report _ Other Terrance Harri ton, retary Roanoke C my Planning Commission • ~ ~ --- .. ~ei11® TO: Planning Commission FROM: Carol Rizzio DATE: March 3, 1999 RE: Triton PCS, Inc. -Pinkerton Chevrolet Site Since the Plaruzing Commissions Public Hearing on Febniary 2, 1999, Triton PCS, Inc. has submitted additional coverage maps for the Pinkerton Chevrolet site. Coverage maps were submitted for tower heights of 160', 140' & 120'. They show that coverage along the 419 & I-81 corridors is provided at all three heights; however, the type of coverage diminishes as the towers height lowers. At tower heights lower than 160' coverage is lost along the Rt. 419/311 loop on the north side of I-81. The red areas depict areas where in-car portable level coverages are available. The yellow areas depict where in-building coverages are available in a suburban environment, and the green areas depict in-building coverages are available in an urban environment. ~,~ ~ GENTRY LOCKE S- .~ RAKES & MORE Attorneys at Law 10 Franklin P.oac. S.E. 540.983.9300 Direct No. ~-10.98_•931? Po;, Office Box 40013 Facsimile 540.983.9400 Roanoke, Virginia _4033-0013 February 19, 1999 Martha Hooker 2821 Hook Drive Salem, VA 24153 Re: Triton PCS, Inc. (A) 925 N. Electric Road (Pinkerton Chevrolet) (B) 1887 Electric Road (Good Shepherd Church) Dear Ms. Hooker: As you know, we represent Triton PCS, Inc., which is licensed by the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") to develop a digital telecommunications system in the Roanoke Valley for AT&T. The Planning Commission considered each of these applications at its meeting on Febniary 2. At that time, the Planning Commission voted 4 to 1 to deny the application for issuance of a special use permit for the construction and use of a 160' monopole at the Pinkerton Chevrolet property. The Planning Commission also unanimously approved the extension of the US Cellular monopole from 120' to 160' at the Salem water tank site in Glenvar. There was no citizen opposition to either of these projects. In addition, the Plaruiing Commission voted 4 to 1 to recommend approval of the 120' monopole at the Good Shepherd Church on Route 419 at Oak Grove. We understand that the Planning Commission has now decided to reconsider the applications with respect to the Pinkerton Chevrolet and Good Shepherd Church sites. A special meeting of the Planning Commission has been scheduled for March 16 at 7:00 p.m. for these purposes. The Board of Supervisors will consider the matters on March 23. I write to provide you with some additional information about each of these projects for your consideration prior to the meeting on Nlarch 16. ' Triton has selected 24 sites in the Roanoke Valley to complete its digital telecommunications network for AT&T. Nine are located in Roanoke County, twelve in Roanoke City, two in Salem and one in Vinton. Of these, five are attached to existing city or county water towers, three are located on existing power poles, five are rooftop installations, seven are monopoles and four are lattice towers. All of these sites are interconnected, and without any one of them the network will have a ;ap in coverage, which is unacceptable to the FCC, AT&T and to Triton. I=11?2'.I 1'55998. I GENTRY LOCKE RAKES & MORE Martha Hooker February 19, 1999 Pa`e -2- The network has been designed by Triton's Radio Frequency engineers, taking into account the existing topographic limitations imposed by our mountains, hills and valleys, which is truly a challenge. Once the network is designed, the challenge is then to find available sites. Triton would prefer not to build any towers because of the expense, and the process of approval is uncertain and time-consuming. Building towers is a last resort. In all cases, Triton attempts to first locate one of its antennas on an existing structure. If none are available, it attempts to collocate on an existing tower built by another provider. If not available, only then does Triton move forward with an application to construct one of its towers. These are the same goals and objectives contained in the new ordinance. Digital technology provides clearer more private and secure transmission, with additional features not afforded by cellular telephones, such as e-mail capability, caller ID, paging and other services. The industry is rapidly moving toward digital telecommunications for these reasons, and existing cellular providers such as L'S Cellular will convert to digital over the next few years because of its superiority. y There are currently only two digital providers in the Roanoke Valley, Triton and GTE. All other wireless telecommunication providers currently use standard cellular (analog) technology. It is important to understand that digital technology is quite different from cellular technology. Cellular travels at lower frequencies and further distances than does digital. It is also pliable and will "bend" around trees, hills, buildings and other structures. As a result, the location and height of towers in a cellular system need not be so precise. Digital technology, however, is totally different. It transmits at a higher frequency and travels relatively short distances. It is inflexible and operates on a "direct line of sight basis" and will be interrupted if there is a mountain, hill or structure between towers. As a result, digital towers are generally required to be higher and closer to each other in order to provide a direct line of sight to another tower. Triton would prefer that the monopoles for which it is requesting approval be significantly higher than as requested. Because of the exactness of digital technology, however, Triton is able to design its towers at the minimum height necessary to achieve the required coverage. Building a tower at a height less than requested will result in an inferior network and require another telecommunication tower to support it. This is contrary to the premise contained in the new ordinance favoring non-proliferation of towers in the County. I1"„ I I =a~993.1 GENTRY LOCKE RAKES & MORE Martha Hooker February 19, 1999 Pave -3- v The real issue with respect to these monopoles is their visibility and neighborhood compatibility. Triton has fully complied with all of the County's requirements under the ne~v ordinance with respect to these applications except one -- we cannot make the monopoles invisible. There is not a single location in Roanoke County from which our proposed towers will not be seen from someone's vantage point. That is the only disadvantage of wireless technology. It must have a tower to support certain segments of the network. Triton has. however, designed the proposed monopoles so as to minimize as much as possible any adverse impact on surrounding properties. Additionally and significantly, the monopole design allows for the maximum collocation opportunities for other providers so that over time the County can realize its goal of having fewer towers, rather than more. Pinkerton Chevrolet Site Specifically with respect to the Pinkerton Chevrolet location, the staff recommended denial of the monopole and the Planning Commission expressed concern about the height of the monopole as the primar~~ reason for recommending denial. Additionally, several members expressed skepticism that the owner of the Budgetel Inn across the street in Salem had refused Triton's request to locate a monopole there. Carol Rizzio, the Assistant County Planner assigned to this project, said that she called and spoke with the owner's wife who indicated that her husband would now be willing to lease the property. The owner had previously and emphatically advised Triton that he would not permit it to locate a monopole on the property. After that rejection, Triton negotiated a lease for the Pinkerton Chevrolet site. We do not believe it appropriate or relevant that the owner of the Budgetel Inn may now be willing to lease (if that is the case), and the discussion amonv the members of the Planning Commission concerning this issue prejudiced the outcome. v _ There was no opposition expressed at the community meeting on February 1, and no citizens spoke in opposition at the Planning Commission meeting. After much discussion, Ms. Hooker and other commissioners expressed concern about the height of the tower, and we were unable to convince the majority that a tower height less than 160' would be insufficient. A shorter monopole will require the construction of another monopole between the Pinkerton Chevrolet site and the next tower location in the network in order to fill the Qap. Since the hearing we have prepared additional propagation maps showinv the coverage of the tower at heights of 160', 140' and 1?0'. The difference in the quality. Vof the coverage along I-81 and Route 419 is demonstrably diminished as shown on these maps. Copies of these new propagation maps are I-1-3' I I ~-15998.1 GENTRY LOCKE RP,KES & MORE Martha Hooker February 19, 1999 Pa`e -4- ~` enclosed for your review and information. Copies have also been provided to the Planning Staff. A copy of my letter to them is enclosed. NIr. Witt and IVIr. Robinson were also of the opinion that a suitable site across the street in Salem could be found. Triton originally attempted to locate across the street in Salem at the Quality Inn Motel and several other sites, including the Budgetel Inn. None of those locations worked from a radio frequency perspective or were available. There are no collocation opportunities in the area. Even if an appropriate site is available, a tower across the street in Salem would have no less visual impact than the one at the Pinkerton Chevrolet location. It is critical that Triton be permitted to construct and use the 160' monopole at the Pinkerton Chevrolet property. There simply are no other reasonable alternatives in this area of the County. A 160' monopole at the Pinkerton Chevrolet site will provide collocation opportunities for other digital and cellular providers, thereby minimizing the number of telecommunication towers in the County. Accordingly, we will ask you to approve our request that the proffered conditions applicable to the site be expanded to permit the construction and use of the monopole in addition to use as a new car dealership. We will also request that you approve the issuance of a special use permit for the monopole. Good Shepherd Church Site A monopole at this location is needed to receive and transmit from other facilities in West Roanoke County and Salem, and east along Route 419 to Roanoke City. Triton originally attempted to locate a rooftop antenna next door on the Allstate building. Unfortunately, Allstate would not agree to lease space on its roof to Triton. The Allstate building was desirable because it had direct line of sight to Triton's other facilities and to Route 419 without any buildings, trees or other structures in the way to interrupt transmission. By comparison, the proposed monopole on the church property is further back from the road, and there is an existing stand of tall trees and the church itself between the site and other towers and Route 419. As a result, the monopole is required to be hither than the height of the antenna initially proposed at Allstate in order to get the same coverage. Triton also looked for other existing locations across the street in Roanoke City, including the Showtimers property. However, City officials advised Triton that approval at that location would be denied due to the fact that the property is surrounded on three sides by nearby residences and neighborhoods. Triton has been unable to locate other alternative sites in the City or the County along This stretch of Route 419 that work from a radio frequency perspective or are available for i~~z~ It sase~s.i GENTRY LOCKS RAKES & MORE Martha Hooker February 19, 1999 Page -5- *- ~~ ,,., lease. There are no collocation opportunities in the vicinity. As a result, Triton leased a portion of the rear of the property owned by the Good Shepherd Church for the location of its 120' monopole. Adjoining and nearby properties consist of a mix of general commercial and residential uses, including the Allstate building, Owens & Company Realtors, a bank, general offices, Oak Grove Elementary School, a retail gas station and strip shopping malls with retail tenants and offices. A community meeting was held on February 1 at the County Administration building. Approximately 10 citizens attended. A few of them expressed opposition at the Planning Commission hearing, primarily related to the monopole's visibility. The staff recommended denial of the monopole at this location, and suggested that the County may be amenable to a series of shorter towers along Route 419 as opposed to one 120' monopole at this location. This, howetirer, runs contrary to the non-proliferation objectives of the ordinance, and would eliminate the collocation opportunities afforded by the proposed monopole. tilr. Thomason was unconvinced that a location in Roanoke City could not be obtained, and moved to recommend denial. We suggested that even if a site could be found, a 120' monopole across the street from the church property would have no less effect on County residents in the immediate area. After discussion similar to the one pertaining to the Pinkerton site, the Planning Commission voted against the motion. 1~Ir. Robinson made a substitute motion to approve, and the Planning Commission recommended approval of the request for a special use permit on a 4 to 1 rote. As I said earlier, it is impossible to construct a tower anywhere in Roanoke County without it bein? seen from somewhere. Triton has demonstrated its attempts to locate elsewhere on existing. structures. that none are available, and that there are no collocation opportunities anywhere nearby. There simply are no other reasonable alternatives in this area. Since the hearing on February 2, Triton has had additional propagation maps made of the proposed to«~er at 1?0' and 100' to show the degradation in the level and quality of service at the lost er height. These maps clearly demonstrate that the monopole, at 120', is the minimum required at this location. Copies of these new maps are enclosed, and we have sent copies to the Plannin~7 Staff as «ell. GENTRY LOCKS RAKES & MC?ORE Martha Hooker February 19, 1999 Paae -6- A 120' monopole at the Good Shepherd Lutheran Church is a critical connection between other approved facilities along or near Route 419. This site is, quite simply, at the heart of Triton's network. Without it, Triton will be unable to link its network together to provide the required coverage along the major roads leading from Salem to Roanoke City. Accordingly, we will ask that a special use permit be issued to authorize the construction and use of a 120' monopole at this location, as previously recommended by the Planning Commission. Your support is critical to the success of Triton's digital network for AT&T. Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to seeing you on March 16. In the interim, if you have any questions, please call me at 983-9312. Yours sincerely, GENTRY LOCKS RAKES & MOORS GMPjrr~lah cc: dlr. Terrance L. Harrington ~1~:" John Murphy ~,, ~1s. Carol Rizzio Mr. Franl: J. Shortall 1~•lr. John A. Slater I~-=? Il :~3599R.1 ~~~~~~ ~ ~~~~~aT PETE T fOhIER: Triton PCS, lnc. PREPARED 8Y: CAROL RIZ?10 P~'-'',r '. i I >~,. Executive Summary ,, ~.,. CASs NUMBER.: 4-2/99 DA, T E: January 20, 1999 This is a request for a rezoning to amend proffered conditions and a special use permit to install a teiecommunicaticns facility on property located off Route 419 in ti.e Catawba Nlagisteriai Districi. B. Description This is a petition of Triton PCS; inc. requesting an amendment to a existing proffered condition and a special use permit to install a 162.5 foot cellular monopole faciiit~i on property currently being used as the Pinkercn Chevrolet automobile dealership. The property, T a;< Nlap Number 36.15-1-11 is ou~med by Pinkerton Properties, LLC and is located in the Catawba 1/lagisterial District. It is currently zoned C-2 conditional, with 'the condition that the property by used only as a "neln~ car dealership". I he petitioner is requested to amend the condition to also allow the operation, construction and use of a telecommunications facility, including a monopole with antennae and related equipment. The total Pinkerton property contains 11.55 acres. The proposed facilit~r ~~~vould occupy a 50"~30' lease ict and have a 12 foci wide access easement across the Pinke;-ton property to Route 419, C. P,pplicable !'?eguiaticns ~,~deral ,Regulations - In 1996 the federal government amended the laws that apply to the cellular telephone industry, including guidancU on Iecai zoning authority. The fedora( communications Act of 1996 preserved local zoning authority in the siting of broadcasting towers. However, Section 704 of the Act states that such local regulations "1} shall not unreasonably discriminate among providers of functionaihy equivalent S2NIGeS: and II} shall not prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the provision of personal wireless services." In adopting this language it was the legislative intent to "provide localities the flexibility to treat facilities that create different visual, aesthetic, cr safety concerns differently to the extent permitted under generally applicable zoning requirements." The act also clearly maintains the FCC's jurisdiction over radio frequency emissions and any radio interference. Finally, the act requires substantial written evidence in a written record for any decision to approve or deny a cell site. Local Regulations - In the interest of preserving the scenic and natural beauty of Roanoke County the goals of the County are: to achieve a long term reduction in the number of towers, to achieve a reduction in the height of towers, especially those located along or near ridgetops of major mountains and land forms, and to relocate towers that exist within a high visual impact area. "'' ,. it is the official policy of the {.;ounty to encourage and promote the co-location of antennas on existing public and private structures within the County. Therefore permits for new broadcasting towers should only be requested and granted when no other reasonable alternative e:<ists for locating needed antennas. V'Ihen na other reasor,abie alternative S;UStS for CG-iGCatlOn, brcadGaSting tower iCCatlGns at e~e'JatlGns lower than surrounding ridge lines are preferred. In the C-% General Commercial District, a special use permit must be approved by the Beard Gf Supervisors prior to the installation of a broadcasting tower. The exact height is to be established as a condition of the permit. Additional design standards address lighting, if required by FAA,, notification Gf the FAA, and local airport control to~rrer, and setback requirements. In addition to a special use permit, the previously proffered conditions to permit only a "new car dealership" must be amended to also permit a te!ecommunicaticns facility. Site plan approval, erosion and sediment control permit, and a building permit shall be required. PART it A. ~~Qirsiti cf B~ist~~a ~on~~aaons Location -The site is ;coated off Route 419 approxirnate!;.: one mile sout h of Interstate 01. The tower site is ioca,ted on the back southern end cf the property Pinkerton Property adjacent to the residential lots located at the end of Emissary Dr. Toocgraohv and Vegetation - Rt. 419 through this aces runs along the top Gf a ridge that is der`ined by two valleys that run along either side. Because Gf its elevation, in con.parison to others in the surrounding area; and the limited amount Gf vegetation, you can see fairly far. ~Jegetation at the proposed tower site is comprised of mainly scrub trees ~ shrubs. The topography drops off quickly to the east Gf the louver site. Access -Currently the Pinkerton Chevrolet Auto lot has access off Route 419 at the northern most end of its property. A.n existing paved drive through Pinkerton property leads to within 400 feet of the site. Surrounding ~leighborhood -The surrounding neighborhood is comprised of a wide variety of uses. To the northinorth-east is low lying rolling field with law density housing on the outskirts. To the east is a 60 foot wide APCO easement. The Montclair Estate Residential Community is located just Gn the other side of the APCO easement. Directly south of the proposed site are two vacant Pots zoned C-2. Crossing Rt. 419 to the west/north=west is a fast food restaurant, two large hotels and a fe~N small industrial and office parks that are currently under construction. Cultural and Scenic Resources -Because of the areas topography, this section of 419 provides some rural views and vistas of surrounding mountains, • 3 ~"' ....J B, ANALYSIS CAF PROP~ScD DEVELOPfviel\1T Use/Function -The proposed use is fora 160 fcot telecommunications monopole faciiiry, Tne total Height of the structure, including antennas; will be 162.;a feet above ground level. Triton Inc. states that this in the minimum height necessary to obtain and maintain adequate coverage in this area and that t..e towers height of 160 feet is necessary because a direct line of sight needed from tower to tower. This tower needs to connect to an existinG 60 foot tower on Red Lane in Salem. The cell tower would increase coverage along the Rt. 419 corridor from Rt. 3'11 south to 460. It will also increase coverage along the I-S i corridor between exits 140 &141. Triton's Radio Frequency (RF j engineers have identified 'the area that includes this property as a necessary location for antennae in order to provide uninterrupted service coverage to the citizens and business community in this part of the County. Coverage maps were prepared by Triton Inc. showing the amount of coverage a 160' tov~d~sr would provide. Staff asked them to prepare coverage maps r'or to~rver heights of 140', 120', and 100' in order to compare coverage differences. The applicant chose not to produce the additional coverage maps. Site La~~rout/Architecture -Tne proposed tcwer vile would occupy a 50' ~ 30' leased lc% located on the back southern end of the 11.55 acre parcel. Tne leased lot is located adjacent to the 60' wide APCO easement. At its cicsest point, it is 60 feet from adjoining residential property lines. The ste would include the 150' monopole with 9 ;panel antennas and four 10' X 12' concrete pads for the location of equipment sheds. Ore ~woufd be used by Triton and the other three ~~~vouid be available for possible future co-locators. The total 1500 square foot area ~~NOUId be enclosed by a 8 foot high chain link fence. Tne proposed monopole has an appro;<imate diameter of 4'/2 feet at the bass tapering to 1 '/2 feet at the top. The tower will be constructed out of steel with a flat finish. No lights will be located at the top of the pole unless required by the FA,A.. Lights may be installed around the tower base, but will not exceed 25 feet. Access/Traffic Generation -Access to the site from Route 419 will be provided by the existing Pinkerton Chevrolet entrance point. A 400 foot long constructed gravel drive wiif provide direct access to the tower site. The site would be unstaffed, and after construction, only generate traffic of a periodic nature to accomplish routine maintenance and general site upkeep. Fire & Rescue - This request must comply with section 30-?3 Emergency Communication of the County Code. The owner shall bE responsible to insure that this tower does not interfere 4vith Roanoke County's emergency Communication System. The request has no impact on current firs and rescue services. Utilities - Public water and sanitary sewer are available to this property. This rezoning does not affect the existing public water and sanitary rawer systems. 4 Drainage - A Site Plan and/or Erosion and Sediment Control Plan will be required. ~~' Screening ~ gufferina - No screening/buffering is required in the current zoning ordinance. Although Considering its close proximity to residential propery, certain measures should be taken to buffer the site frorn the surrounding residential areas as much as possible. Visibility -Because of the tovvers proposed height and its topographic location, slat'! believes that the tower wilt be visible from many of the surrounding areas m Roanoke County and the City of Salem, especially within a 2 mile radius of the tower. The lack of vegetation on Pinkerton Property and the surrounding areas drop in elevation increases the towers visibility, For example, from Cove Road, east of the site, the existing light poles on the Pinkeron Chevrolet property are very visible. Proposed Tower Visibility maps were prepared by Triton Inc. The maps show general areas from which the tower would be visible, not taking into account local elevation variations, buildings, trees, or vegetation. CONFORMAl~1CE 1l~/ITH THE COUNTY'S ZONI~iG ORDINANCE POLICIES A,~ID REOUIF.EMENTS OF I`~EUV TEl_ECOIVlIV1UNICATIONS FA,CILI T IES P,II special use permit requests for ne~nJ broadcasting towers shall be reviewed by the staff, Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors on the basis of the following criteria: ~) Dc any other reasonable alternatives exist? Are there other existing structures that are cf suitable height and Iccatlon ;n the surrounding area The applicant has submitted a list of four other possible alternatives that were, researched and rejected, ail cf which were in the City of Salem. Two alternatives were not suitable for either technical or geographical reasons. The other tvvo ~nJere proposed on properties owned by the two large hotels, Cuaiity inn and Budgete!, across Rt. 419 from the current proposal. Quality Inn, Sheraton Dr. -The applicant proposed to remove the Quality Inn sign, construct a tower and then replace the sign on the tower. Salem's sign ordinance would not permit this. Budgetei, Sheraton Dr. -Owner would not lease to the applicant. Staff contacted the owner, they expressed interest in leasing. Staff is not sure why owner is now expressing interest. City of Salem Substation/Electric Utility Poles, Loch Haven Dr. - RF engineers determined to far away from other towers. Swifco Properties, Russell Dr. -geographically/technically not suitable Jce Yates, planner for the City of Salem, has spoke previously with the applicant and suggested the Salem City water tank near e;<it 141, however the applicant stated that that site would not work. 2) is the tower height lower than surrounding ridge fines? The tower height is lower than the ridge lines of orushy and For Lewis i'Vicuntains to the narhinorh-east. Although to all points east, south, and south-west it height is greaier than surrounding land forms and buildings. 5 ~`..~, 3) Is the height the lowest height necessan~? T'ne applicant has stated that a 160 foot tower is the lowest height necessary in this area. f~~owever, they have no comparative maps and or diagrams to show that a lower ta~~ver would or would not provide an adequate amount of coverage. ~) Is the tower design a monopole design or ether of least visual impact? Yes, the tower design is a mcr,opole structure, reducing its visual impact in the landscape. ~) Is it within a critical viewshed of the Blue Fridge Farkway or P,ppalachian Trail? The final viewshed maps have not been completed to date. However, the towers location should not have a visual impact on thew scenic resources. 6) Is it within or adjacent to an area designated as being an area of local scenic, historic, ecoloaical or cultural importance? Nc. 7) Can the faoiiity provide the opportunity for at least 3 other providers to co-locate? The applicant has provided ground space for 3other possible co-locators. Ho~vever, co-located antennas on the louver viii have to be placed at heights lower than 160'. ~) iJ the Site Currently Ser!/ed by e;<Ist~ng roads and ut111lles neC2SSar y? Yes, the site currently has road access and all utilities necessary for operation. 9) How many CO-located antennas does the applicant currently have? This inr"ormation ~,n~ill be presented at the public hearing by the applicant, 10) Are the base and top elegy,/ations of the proposed tower relative to surrounding land forms and structures? No, the towers height is significantly areater than surrounding land forms and structures. 11) Is the proposed tower compatible with adjacent landuses. ie: neighborhood compatibility? The tower is not compatible with the adjacent residential and open field landuses. In addition, this part of Rt. 419 remains with an open rural character despite the existing commercial/industrial developments in the immediate area. C. CO~JFORMANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE FLAN The site is located in the Transition land use category, This land use area encourages the orderly development or" highway frontage parcels. Transition areas generally serve as developed buffers between highways and nearby or adjacent lower intensity development. A broadcasting tower of 'this height at this location does not fit within the contest of its surroundings at this transitionally designated land use area. D. COI~JFCR~IA~lCE VV1 T N COUN TY DE'~IE'~OPIVIENT STA,I~IDA.RD ~ "~ The submitted site development plan exc:eds the minimum setbaci{ requirements for broadcasting towers. PART fli S T A.FF CO(~ICLUSiO~S Because of the areas existing rural character, surrounding residential areas, and its visibility from surrounding points it is staffs belief that a tower at this location ~~vill potentially have an obtrusive visual impact on the area. The proposed height of the tower is much greater than any surrounding land form or structure. If the proposed height is only necessary to obtain a direct line of sight with one other tower, staff wonders if that could be accomplished with an intermediate rooftop location or other alternative. 1t is staffs belief that the tower should be the Iewest height necessar`~ for adequate coverage and that before a tower is approved at a specific height, documentation that the height requested is the lowest necessan~ should be provided. Should the Commission recommend approval, the following proffers should be considered: (~) Only a monopole broadcasting tower design with 9 Pane! antennas shall be permitted. (2) The final site deve!oprnent plan shah generally cUnform with the °Land Burley" site, plan prepared by Atlantis Croup; lnc. on October ~ 5; 1998. (~ j The tower structure, antenna, and a!I attached support hardware shall be a flat matted color so as to better blend into the landscape and reduce visibility and light reflection. In addition, any other accessory structures and fencing shall be of a material and color that blends into the landscape, reducing visibility and light reflection. (~) The 1500 square foot area shall be either erciosed with a 8' high wood privacy fence or evergreen shrubs a minimum of 6' in height shall be planted around the chain link fenced area screening it from surrounding views. (5) iVo lighting shall be installed on the tower structure or equipment building except for security lighting not to exceed a height of 25 feet in height, except as may be required by the FAA or other governmental or regulatory agency. (6) The tower shall be structurally designed to carry sufficient loading, and the site have the potential to accommodate the additional equipment necessary for at least three other vendors/providers of communications services, in order to minimize the proliferation of towers in the vicinity of this site. In addition, by executing the special use permit requested, the applicant agrees to make the tower available for lease within the structural capacity of the tower and at reasonable costs adequate to recover the capital, operating and maintenance costs of the tower location required for the additional capacity. (r) If the use of the tower structure for wireless communications is discontinued, the tower structure shah be dismantled and removed from the site within 30 days of notice by the County and the special use permit shall become void. COU(~1 T Y OF ROB.' DEPT. Gr= FL?.~~al`JG i2 J4 ~~~nal ~ iJr. P.Q. BOX 2°8C0 Roan~k''e, V,-^-. 24018 IS ih@ dGCIlCatiCn COfT1Gi2tc: P~e'a.2 C`1eCX fi 2nC;OScd. ~~~~.~~' ~ iC'(~ `Jbl~~'_ ~C'I C~ ~.~C~ ~:~ i~ ,=.iVY Cr ~ 'i,C..c !-2`viS A.Rc ~V11SSiNG 0`: I~lCC~~1r'~=TB. n Far surf use on,~ly 1 ~appiicauon f_e~ ~~'Cr6Z.-. da~~,.., ~"' ~~p [_ards'~S~,ut;~~ Ic ;5 date: i 'y r ~ ~ Apo(ic~~~t's na~~~e: Triton PCS, Inc. , :,one: (804) 323-9~ ~.ddrss: 9211 Arboretum PSr~v'a,T, ;200, Richmond, VA Zic Cede: 23236 ~;..~~~~ CommuniTy r,~~,i ~.4~ ~g rea: cis~ing %oning: C-2 Conditional =;fisting ~ ..nd Use: Automcoile dealership ~~ s _`?:F~~~: n. -~.-7' a ~h=-.'`> 1~1 7:~ '"f.'ti.. r~+ ;J ~,~.•~,~+ ~. ~ ~~'"s .{'_";~r i :`~~~J ~s _'. j~~ .. .. .. P~_ccsad Zonir~c: C_?-,~~,-~rr~= . (•~„ ProL~e-red "Cordi tions~ 1: ~ `~ _ i Picpcsad Land Use: Ta~ecomrnur.icati ohs Fac~l~t-; L'^~ ti'c,~3rCc, nle°; tlla 'nlr'~iiTUr'1 ~Ot are ;~ '~'~4CL", anC Tr~ntcge iE'ry'uifET2nIS CT '7c c^.UEStcC "iSti lC:~ `!;=S Y i~1C iF N0, A, V,^.Ri;~.~4tCc IS ~,~ :UIF~.BT ~ ~~~;C ~. IG02S the paiC°I fT1E°T, t,7E nIInlCill.I1-n Cill°;ia iCi ti,~ i=cUestad USc i';'~'e~ Y °i Irv' I~ IV~., r. V,'.~IA.:UCH IC R'~UIF~~T rl~~l _ ~ ~f i2-nnln^ .~^fJES'. arc CCnC;LIOnS ~@;nC .^~f~7iTc._~ 'NILfI u~l(S 'c^.UESZf ~~~~~ `~ ~al~ ~s v fus v ~s `~ 1 ~ CCfisUltailCn ~ ~ g ll2" X 11' CCf1C°pt ~,an ~ I~ ACCIiC,=,iOn ic° ~ Apeiicatien c .~ ~ Me*.es and ccurds cescricticn ~ ~ ~ E '~ °rc~~e's, r a~ciicas,e „~ustirica,ion Water and sewer appiic~tion ~_~ A.a;oining ~rcper'y o'~~ners !,~eredy a2r'iry :he. l am, eit;~e~ the a~,vne: -cr .,-e ~~o~:a,-,~ a~ me ,~.me r'., ;~e~r .a~ _cnr,.... ~u~~ha~_. sn.~, alb t']C'. i//i ~'! ''Nlrl'7 i/7e . ^Qe.-t~,n0 COnv , ~ ~ e1~ ~~'~V//e ~~ ~e.7~ ' C'UVn , r \ ~ ~ ~"~ ~~ ~- ~! lgnatL're: CWn2.`' S ~ ~ Y_..~ ~_J~~1'f- jU. Michael Pace, Jr. , Esouire, Attorne~~ for 'Triton PCS, Irc. ~ 3 0 0 ~? 1"x'1 1~.J ` ~ o ^ ~ 3 a r ~ ~ ~~ ai ~ ~~ i L. " ~, ~ ',I i'm' Im o WIC= o, a J 6 ~~ _I ~n w < ~; o I ~~j ~I ~o ox~ I ~ I¢ '? , ~- ~~~ u ~ a ~ 4 Y~,~ ~ ~ ~; ~ ~z ~ I ~ ~,.3Y l~ ,~ ~ ~ w~ ~ ~ rn ~ rc i, ~ z ~ W Q ~, z .. w':y 1~ - :: Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .`' `~ ~_ -~ -a -- w m _ Z U w 1 4 ~~ t ~ ~ ~ -~ 1~ rnu[ ~ ~ I i~ ~ ~ I ~~ -~~ ~ ~ m~a i =.~ ro~i ' ~~~ ~ ~~A ¢ w ~ b .~ ~ ~~ ~~ > ; k ~ $ ~ ~ a s ~ " ~ ¢ w a :° C _ ~= ~ a, iii _ a J ~ ~ ~~~a ~ s~ ~ ~~ S ~$~~~~~ O g_ ~ ~ ~ m~~°~~ s a n R~ R 3~ g U ~ o i ~ I & ~ 8 Sa § ~o- I ~ ~ W _ ~ es a~o~ W ~ i ~ : ~ ~ ': g~ c~ W I ~ ~~ ~ J -J .~.$ ~ s s s _ ~ ~ w ~ s u ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ o w= ~ ~~ _~,~ u a LPN ~~ ~ ~ a ~ s ~ ~ a~o~a~ F ~~a ~ ~ ~. ~ ~a ~ " d ~ ~ qq ~ 9 ~= F~ x c W ~:a W<$S - ~ s a~ ~~.~ ~ w ~ m ~ o~`~a~s 3 =~'° ~ ~~o ~w o ~~ w ¢ ~ ± ~~,~...~:. O k i^ c °o ~ $a c ~ Wsk'b o_ 'gb °m'gs~ ~~ ¢ ~ 5 `J ~ es' J_~ ~.~ Z ` < Q $ . iY ~ WR~b~~3 wi~i dw i~~4edw b~~ ~ k ""~'" ~ T y ~ g q ~ ~~`8`dz's~ oa d'~ ~ 2~$`sF ay y8g~'~n4~ Z ~` r~ ... W Y ~ ~ ~ Z ~ F a w ~ ~ w3~~~noa= 3~"~~~ >ob oYg ~b~ w ~a~~" -; . o F ~ ~ ~ Y ~ ~ U ~ o i ~~u _ aVawaj ~ .-~ ~~C '~r ~ ~' I d N _ m _ ~' ~ _~b++ 0 I ~ > ~_~ E 0 m i 3 m O j ', 0 i s w ~ -: ,i J~? x _ a ~ U U ~ a• - - - U Q ~ r U - ~ c~ "' ~ ~ - t ~~ ~ t, ~ ` ~ ~J Z ~ > Z ~ t,...y I ~ ~ _~ J I ~,_ a ~ ~ ~ o il ~~ ~l .- ¢~ . ~ ~~ Iv . ¢ . 'ii~ Iii . H ¢ r i I ~I l¢', ~u s 9p ~ W . I ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~m~ w wiLL ~~ - ~ ~~ ~ ~I ~~~ ~ ~idi .~ ~ l i I I I _ ~ ' ~_, i _ Ito _ L-,_ _ ~ _ o , f~ im ~' o Io l ~ ' l. -I- ~_ _ 'aim _ _,_ ~ ~ ,_~ m ~ _.. w NI I `q ~ ~. .- ~ o ~ i '~ ~I ` °od~ Y `6 i oic ~ i I < ~I Q a ~ Io ~ ~ ~ ,., ~~ i,: w gi~ LL LL v w ~ ~ ~ z ~~ I~ ~i I ~ ° .~ o ~ °~ ° i ~ ry j , - `i i m ~ I,' w i , - K ID w ~ yi LL 2 V; } IN Sw G `_~ I~ I l s i1 `_. _ ~ ~ r ---- j ~~~~r~Y'~ ~ K aR~ ~ ~~ ,- I W ii .°~= ~ ~~ s < suw '~~3m ~m ~ '~ ~ Fez ~ ~o g ~'~ dnr s•V saai ~,; aiin3~ eva ~n~<°a iii - _ _ .J 0^l a ~ ~ ~ -____ -._. -____._ 9j ..7d i0 1..7:3H ,0'091 ....__ _.._ -__ u ~ ~5 ~~I^ 3 n _ ~ ~~ '~ ~ _ ~~ ~ _ ~ ~- o - ~ ~ l ~ ~~ . ~ ` 4 -z .- .'r ~~ m I ~ ~ _ ~ wiz00 ~ -~ H °~ 41 j V ~ n Z I ~ ;\ 0.~. W~ C~ s ~~ ~ J ~Q ~~ •j Zl- ,3gLL sy.8 QO p JZ d... cn z Z 3 ~~$ Z W ' inn 2 i ~ ~ c Z ~ O ii P it /. ~ ~ ~- ~ _~ _ - _ O 4I I ~ O a-- H } ~^ 4 J x -- W a ,i-.5 °~ S ~ ~m 5~ 3~ C. ~~ ~$ ~ ~ ~~F ~ ~~w ~c¢ ~~9i ~~~~s b ~~3~~ '~s44s 3~.,~ss ~~NW <~6~~6£ ~xeN~ W ~a ~ ~~ Z€ Z 4z W~ a~ ~~ aW = m J ~~ aV §~ W 25° 3~$ ~~ °,.~ N~ o _ _ ~ w ~W ~W~ W 3 W w3 a ~3 ~ ~~ v LL3t ~S -m _a X63 =§ to _ ,.. ., ~w` ~ ~ ~ ~-~ ~ j r m %~ /~ ~ ~~ X / ~~ S9 /• ~ // Y1 ~ ~ _~ ~~, ice,// 1\ /'/ ` ~Q~~'y`~t~~j~{ emu'' '/~js~ ,.~u- l Yom, 'i ~. _. ~ /~~°F\~\y?/~ .s F33~\o 1 / / /' /~~~" -~ ~ \ /~ i ~ ;j ~ i ~ ~ l -o , ~~ i ~,/ ,, ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ / \ 1 ~ 1. ri ~x~ ~ V\ \~y' ~~ ~ ~~ ~z ' 'JO~I !• J%J ~ ,~ i ~~ ~'i / i~ ~ ~ I ~ x. ~/.~ ~ ' ~1 4 1 ~ ~; ';- ~',~ ~.. ~ I j i i ~ I ~i I , ~J z 0 Q W J W W O ~ .' O Z ,: O ~ 5 ~~I~ ~ i~ x ZI Q J 0 W . li ~ . WI H J x ^. 0 /^ i c~ ti ~. I^, - E ~ E i 2 v ¢; o ~ u~ -" J ~ 3 C ~ _ - n x ~ Y - J ~ _ - - ~ D C ~ J ~,~ ~,~ C '~ ~ U ~ - ~ -~ ip D tll o C C C r~ T Irv fD of y c;na cv a - - o -- > c L >, - 7 w > L~ ~ J- c v o o - m m ~~ I I J - a J C V O T C O D ~~ C J < ~ _ . . ., -~~ain c ~ - Q L fi 3 c U In^ . (' I ~~ . ,r~ ,, ~ .. 4~;'_ i + ii_a .w~.:r ~•: 'cS '~,"' ~ ~- r ~ 1 ~~5 ~ 5r . ti ~ yt f ~ ~~. .~- ,ww ~ 'Y +~.yW r w ,~ a ~„ i,. Ir I. Iy'i YA n i_.i _, i.~. c::~ - «: ~ F i~ r ~ ~ s ` ~f _ r.-~ 'Ld ~ •.. . ~i~ . fiu 4 LL--~~~_..... ....w _. ~_ ~, m ~'~~ ~:~?, T „ a~ ~~; ,:; ,~~ - - ~, ~`r ~, y »~ rr. u` t~ Lf -. !L C .i n, dl a If_ fs it ~7~ t I. ~. _. 11 OI V. (~~ ~ T z - I 11~r ....~ ~ ^ J .. ~, ~ 1_ ul.~ tip -~ ~ s _ ,~ . 6 ~4 s.R ~ r. '~"n. !'. T • ~~ ;:• ' a ~ * ~ d 1 ~ ~; r ~ti li ''~~ :~~. 1 • 1~"~ir ~yy ~ 4 ~• ti ~' " .. ~ ~~ 1i • Lod •~~ y ~~ „ ~ C LS ~ _~ri.. ~ir'~Ra~ ~ T r •' !'"shy, .• M~ - ` ; ` . ~ `4_~~ . '~'° Z i N T h ~i "' E _ E ~ y ~ c oin~ ~ u J ~, 3 s Cn - ~ T n r~ ;, ~ ~ = - o ;fir „ o mo -~-, o ~ c r - rn _ Q1 °-, m m~ra~ cv- i ~ J O C L L~ > Li J - ~ ¢ O ~ - iJ m CI -~ c E I c - W- y G o - c o - - ~ .J .. ~ U d U) ~ ~ c o u c ~ ~.. m o ~ I~~ _ 2 i W s U N. _.T -.._ ___ - `~ ~ J ~ '~~ ~ jai i ~~ r'„' r ~, . e '• x ~ , ? ' ~, ; ~ ^~~ '~ :4. .. y. •,~ ~j ~ ;~~ ~ r .. - +~,,~ •f b . ~ t .~ ~. ^ • ~ .~ _ ~~ ~ ~' ..S ~ ~ `~ ' ~ '+ ' ~ ti + ~ , ~. ,~ ~... ~ ;~~, ° I s~ ~ t ~~M,m T # } ~ ` , ~ ~r . r ~~y.N i ~~ ~ {+, ` '' '1 .. ' f f '~j,~' _ ,. - - !l„ ~F ' iS.C~ ,i r ~ b f ~ R i ~ II •~~ nil. d , r "~ • , ~ Sri e-: j!:~~ ~~~,~ - T ' ~. •~ •~ ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 1999 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 11.66-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 925 NORTH ELECTRIC ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 36.15-1-11) IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2, CONDITIONAL, TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2, AND GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A 160 FOOT CELLULAR MONOPOLE TOWER, UPON THE APPLICATION OF TRITON PCS, INC. (PINKERTON CHEVROLET) WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 23, 1999, and the second reading and public hearing were held March 23, 1999; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on February 2, 1999; and reconsidered the matter on March 16, 1999; and reviewed the Findings of Fact which are attached to this ordinance as Exhibit 1; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board concurs in the Findings of Fact attached to this ordinance as Exhibit 1; and 2. That the zoning classiEcation of a certain tract of real estate containing 11.66 acres, as described herein, and located at 925 North Electric Road (Tax Map Number 36.15-1-11) in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District, with conditions, to the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District, with amended conditions. 3. That this action is taken upon the application of Triton PCS, Inc. 4. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Triton PCS, Inc. to construct a 160 foot cellular monopole tower to be located on a 11.66-acre tract of real estate located at 925 North Electric Road (Tax Map No. 36.15-1-11) in the Catawba Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1999 Community Plan pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.2-2232 of the 1950 Code of U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\ZONING\TRITON.PK 1 '`~ w a Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved with the following conditions: 1) Only a monopole broadcasting tower design with 9 Panel antennas shall be permitted. 2) The final site development plan shall generally conform with the "Land Survey" site plan prepared by Atlantis Group, Inc. on October 15, 1998. 3) The tower structure, antenna, and all attached support hardware shall be a flat matted color so as to better blend into the landscape and reduce visibility and light reflection. In addition, any other accessory structures and fencing shall be of a material and color that blends into the landscape, reducing visibility and light reflection. 4) The 1500 square foot area shall be either enclosed with a 8' high wood privacy fence or evergreen shrubs a minimum of 6' in height shall be planted around the chain link fenced area screening it from surrounding views. 5) No lighting shall be installed on the tower structure or equipment building except for security lighting not to exceed a height of 25 feet in height, except as may be required by the FAA or other governmental or regulatory agency. 6) The tower shall be structurally designed to carry sufficient loading, and the site have the potential to accommodate the additional equipment necessary for at least three other vendors/providers of communications services, in order to minimize the proliferation of towers in the vicinity of this site. In addition, by executing the special use permit requested, the applicant agrees to make the tower available for lease within the structural capacity of the tower and at reasonable costs adequate to recover the capital, operating and maintenance costs of the tower location required for the additional capacity. 7) If the use of the tower structure for wireless communications is discontinued, the tower structure shall be dismantled and removed from the site within 30 days of notice by the County and the special use permit shall become void. U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\ZONING\TRITON.PK 2 '. 5. That in 1984 rezoning of this property the owner of the property voluntarily proffered in writing the following condition which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, accepted and the Petitioner/Owner is now requesting be removed: (1) 6. That said real estate is more fully described as all of Tax Map No. 36.15-1-11 containing 11.66 acres. 7. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\ZONING\TRITON.PK 3 i ~' Exhibit 1 ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FINDINGS OF FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS arc , PETITION: Triton PCS, Inc. Pinkerton Site FILE NO.: 4 - 2/99 Findings of Fact: Supporting Approval of the Tower: 1. The proposed tower is not located on the ridge line of a prominent mountain, within a critical viewshed of the Blue Ridge Parkway or Appalachian Trail, or adjacent to an area designated as being an area of historic, ecological, or cultural importance. 2. The telecommunications facility provides the opportunity for the co-location of three other providers. 3. The proposed tower site is currently served by existing roads and utilities. `~ '"- Exhibit 1 ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FINDINGS OF FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS arc , PETITION: Triton PCS, Inc. Pinkerton Site; Route 419 Findings of Fact Supporting Denial of the Tower The 419 Frontage Development Plan incorporated as part of the Community Plan adopted by the Board of Supervisors on January 12, 1999, states in its list of goals to Aprotect natural scenic features, including views, to the maximum extent possible and recognize these as amenities to development. @ 2. The towers proposed height of 160' is significantly greater than surrounding land forms and structures. Because of its height and topographic location, the tower would be visible from many surrounding areas, especially within a 2 mile radius. 3. The proposed tower site is adjacent to and will be highly visible from surrounding established single family residential and rural residential areas. 4. The proposed tower site is located along a section of Rt. 419 that provides rural views and vistas of surrounding mountains and fields in all directions. O~ POAN kF6 ~ ;~:, Z y. ~ o Z v,, a 1839 AGENDA ITEM NO. s'-'~O APPEARANCE REQUEST lU PUBLIC HEARING -ORDINANCE _ CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: -, .~. ~, I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: ^ Each speaker wild be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~ ~ l~ L~~/?`~1-:' •r- ~~ . ADDRESS: ~ `~ ~ `;; ~ r~~ ~' -~~--- PHONE: ~(~ ~ ~" ~ l Z ~ 0~ POANp~F` ~, ~ a-, 9 ~ ~.~,> ~ o Z v :: a 183$ APPEARANCE AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ - `O REQ~ST .~ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~ ~ ~~[~ ~~ 1 ©~ a~~~~~. I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBL NAME: ADDRESS PHONE: 5~~ ~ ~ D GI THE CLERK TO THE BOARD o Ste- v ~p~ 7z~ ~~~ O~ QOANp,Y~ ~ ,,:,, 9 z` _ z ov a 1838 APPEARANCE -PUBLIC HEARING ~ `ORDINANCE AGENDA ITEM NO. `~J REQUEST CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~ ~- ~ ~~Gl'~i V/ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND G NAME: TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD ADDRESS: PHONE: ~~r~.u ~ ~ ~~ .~- 0~ POANp~~ ~__ o Z v a 1838 AGENDA ITEM NO. APPEARANCE REQUEST -PUBLIC NEARING ~LORDINANCE _ CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: l°~~ / _ ~ ~IQV~ ~~_, I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TD AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ADDRE PHONE: 8~- 9~~ O~ QOAN kF ti ,... .. t,. ?1 ~,, ,, s AGENDA ITEM NO. rsae APPEARANCE REQ~JEST PUBLIC FIEARING ORDIN CE C TIZ CO ENTS SUBJEC'~?i//~~ ~~ A 70"~ ~~~L1~1 ~ r I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND~GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAM ~'/~ ADDRESS: 5 I ~ Z ~~ PHONE: ~~~ ~~ 7 '~i ~~ ~ L-v ~ ti~ .." +,~~` .." PETITIONER: TRITON PCS, INC. CASE NUMBER: 5-2/99 Planning Commission Hearing Date: Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: February 2, 1999 and March 16, 1999 March 23, 1999 A. REQUEST Petition of Triton PCS (Good Shepherd Church) to obtain a Special Use Permit to construct a 120 foot cellular monopole tower, located at 1887 Electric Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS Vern Jordahl, a member of the church, spoke in support of the request saying that a majority of the congregation had voted in favor of the tower. He said that digital technology is the wave of the future and provides a better alternative than cellular. Elena Derosa, Marian Dodson, Frank Aprile, Jeremy Kolosine, Debra Ballard, Nancy Hartley, Norma Tomlinson, Terri Langford, Patricia Macdonald expressed the following concerns: electromagnetic fields emitting from towers creating health hazards, particularly since it is close to schools and playground; lower property values; destroy natural beauty of the area; Oak Grove will no longer be a desirable neighborhood if the tower is built; cellular phones are dangerous because they distract drivers. Clayton Thomas, a trustee of the church, said he was misled by the church leadership regarding the tower and said he is opposed to the tower. Jim and Vickie Leonard presented photos to the Commission showing how the tower would look on the site; the sky cannot be seen anywhere around Oak Grove without a view of this tower; they are opposed to the request. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION Previous discussion consisted of: The Commission inquired as to what took place between the applicant and Showtimers and why this particular location was chosen. Staff said that the applicant did not make application to the city for a zoning change or permit; the relocation suggested by the applicant was so significant that it would have caused a delay in the application. In response to the Commission's inquiry concerning the adverse impact on the neighborhood behind Showtimers, Mike Pace said the residences behind the theater are closer; there is a better buffer behind the church. The Commission discussed whether another user will be able to co-locate at this site. Mr. Witt said the concern he has is the height of the tower and wanted to know if the community is willing to accept a lower level of service in order to preserve some of the scenic values that this county treasures. The issue is the level of service; we accept a level of service of a 125 foot pole, then we have to accept that level of service of the other five providers. It raises the bar of what we will have to accept from the other providers. i 2 D. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS 1) The maximum height of the proposed broadcast tower shall be 120 feet. 2) The tower shall be a monopole design. 3) A bond or similar performance guarantee, sufficient to ensure the removal of the tower and all associated facilities, shall be required as part of site plan review, prior to site plan approval. 4) The tower shall be designed so that an additional 20 feet can be added to the top of the pole for other users. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Thomason stated that he believes the visual impact of the tower will be detrimental to Roanoke City and County. I do not believe that every altemative has been exhausted. He moved that the petition be denied. He quoted from the broadcast tower ordinance; "when new broadcasting towers are proposed as a last alternative, the requested broadcasting tower location, height and design should be chosen to protect and enhance the beauty of ..." and this does not. Mr. Ross said that he believes other alternatives are available; others are able to provide digital service without tall towers on Route 419 and will support the motion. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Thomason, Witt, Ross, Hooker NAYS: Robinson ABSENT: None Mr. Thomason added: the applicant has by right, option to improve digital signal coverage to this portion of the county. Roanoke County allows towers up to 30 feet in height by right in commercial zoning districts provided the tower is a monopole design and is located in an area already served by above ground utilities. F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE Mr. Robinson said that no matter where it is located in this area, it is still visible and he will support the applicant's petition. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report _ Other Terrance Ha ington,,~(rcretary Roanoke unty P nning Commission ME~o '~'o: Roanoke County Planning Commission from: John 1Vlurphy, Associate Planner Subject: Triton -Good Shepherd Church Tower Re7uest I.3~te: March lb, 1999 M Triton PCS, Inc. has submitted color copies of the coverage areas for with the proposed 120 foot tower compared to a lUU foot tower for the Electric Road Comdor for each of the commissioners to consider. In addition the proposed site of the broadcast tower has been relocated approximately 3U feet behind the original location, but still on church property. The base elevation of the tower is generally the same and the leased area, including the pad and building, are to be located within the area of the property that is currently thick with trees. The fenced area surrounding the tower should be less visible from Electric Road but staff does not expect any difference in the visibility of the tower. Staff will emphasize the conclusion from the original staff report dated Febniar;/ 2, 1999 as compared to its interpretation expressed by G. Michael Pace, representing Triton PCS, Inc. in his letter to the commissioners dated February 19, 1999. Staff specifically was suggesting the possibility of a series of rooftop "antennae" on the Electric Road Corridor as a possible alternative to the 120 foot tower and not a series of "towers" along Route '119. STAFF + ~'t~;'l~T /~ ~E'I'ITI~~~I.t: Triton ~~5, Inc. ~~'~~ ~': ~oia~a Maarplty l/AS~ JM~I~~: #5 - 2199 I~t~T~.',: 2/2/99 3 1~ZST L1a ~19~~+~T~ V~1VA8'i1 Triton ~~'~, Inc. is proposing to install aad operate a i20 foot monopole broadcast tower on 3.8~ acres, owned by Traastees of ties Good Shepherd Irhurclfl, located at 1837 electric 12oad in the Windsor Mils Magisterial district. The property is zoned ~-I and is used for religious Assembly. g3roadcast towers arc permitted in ~-I with a Special Ilse Permit. Tlae sits is designated Transition in the I.2oaa~olce County Co~nma~nity flan. ~, ~I+ SCITI~I~t This is a petition of Triton PCS, Inc. for a Special Use hermit to ccnstruct and operate a 120 foot monopole broadcast tower, located on 3.88 acres of property owned by Trustees of the Good Shepherd Church. The properly is located at 1887 Electric load in the 4~indsor Hills R/Iagisterial District. Tl~e tower would be erected within a 35' x 35', or 1225 square foci leased area adjoining a gravel driveway at the rear of the church and church playground. The leased area is part of the 3.88 acre parcel owned by the church which is zoned ~-1. The site, is within the ~Iindsor sills Community planning Area. ~. A~~IJIC'A~~:;~E t~ITI.,A'~'I~i~TS Federal ~eQulations - In 1996 the federal governmeni amended the laws that apply to the cellular telephone industry, including guidance on local zoning authority. The Federal Communications Act of 1996 preserved local zoning authority in the siting of broadcast towers. However, Section 704 of the Act states that such local regulations: "I) shall not unreasonably discriminate among providers of functionally equivalent services; and II) shall not prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the provision of personal wireless services." In adopting this language it was the legislative intent to "provide localities the flexibility to treat facilities that create different visual, aesthetic, or safety concerns differently to the extent permitted under generally applicable zoning requirements." The Act also clearly maintains the FCC's jurisdiction over radio frequency emissions and any radio interference. Finally, the Act requires substantial written evidence in a written record for any derision to approve or deny a cell site. Local Regulations - in the interest of preserving and enhancing the scenic and natural beauty of,,,r Roanoke County it is the goal of the County to achieve a long term reduction in the number of broadcasting towers within the County, and where possible, to achieve a reduction in the height of existing broadcast towers throughout he County, with special emphasis on towers located along or near the ridgetops of major mountains ar~d land forms. In addition, it is the goal of the County, where possible, to achieve the relocation of existing broadcast towers and associated utility and access corridors which have a high visual impact on scenic resources. it is the official policy of the Count<~ to encourage and promote the co-location of antennas on existing public and private structures within the County. To achieve this end; the County encourages all wireless communication providers to locate antennas on existing structures. I'~~-miis for new broadcasting towers should only be requested when no other reasonable alternative exists for locating needed antennas. When new broadcasting towers are proposed as a last alternative, the requested broadcasting tower location, height and design should be chosen to protect and enhance the scenic and natural beauty of Roanoke County. Site plan review will be required. PA~'T ~ ~. At~AL~'S~S Off' E~~ST~TG CC~1~~3?1'T~~~S Location -The proposed site for the broadcast tower is located on the south side of Electric Road, on the same parcel as the Caood Shepherd Lutheran Church Building. In addition the church owns the adjoining 3.61 acre parcel immediately to the south and east of the location of the proposed tower which is also zoned C-1. To the west is the Allstate facility which is zoned C- l. Topogranhv/Vegetation -The site selected for the broadcast tower has an elevation of 1195 feel above mean sea level. This is the highest point on the parcel for a tower site without disrupting the existing tree line. From the site of the proposed tower the terrain Gradually slopes down in all directions, with the exception of the western edge of the site which has a minor increase in elevation (approximately 5 to 7 feet) but is restricted by the tree line. To the south of the site is a heavily wooded area with mixed hardwood trees. To the west there are hardwood trees, but the Allstate parking lot is easily visible. To the north of the proposed site, is the playground for the church and visible through a narrow row of trees to the east is the playground area for the Oak Grove Elementary School. No data has been submitted by the applicant on the height of the existing treeline immediately adjoining the tower site. Staff estimates the tree line to be approximately 40 feet. With this estimate the tower and antennae will exceed the treeline by approximately 82.5 feet. Surroundin~Neighborhood -The site of the proposed broadcast tower is located on a C-1 zoned property, which immediately adjoins C-I zoned properties on the Electric Road Corridor. Across Electric Road is the Roanoke City Limits which has a mixture of retail and office uses. To the rear of the site is a 6+ acre parcel zoned R-2, which is undeveloped and to the south of that parcel is the beginning of the R-1 honing District with Ridden Valley I-Iomes subdivision as well as other subdivisions. ~. A i~A~YSIS ~~' I'~2~~L~S~~ I~1~~~~~i~T' 1. Do any other reasonable alternatives e°~ist? Awe there other structures of suitable height in the area? The applicant has indicated that alternatives sites do not exist, because they have exhausted their possible site locations. The Allstate facility was an original site for an antenna co-location. 2. Is the height lower than surrounding ridgelines? Yes. Is the height the lowest height necessary? The applicant has indicated that the tower height of 120 feet is the lowest height possible to meet the needs of the system and meet the zoning retluirement of providing space for {3}three additional vendors. ~. Is the tower design a monopole design or other of least visual impact? Yes, the tower is a monopole. Is the tower -within a critical viewshed of the 131ue Ride I~ark~~vay or Appalachian Trail? ~o v b. Is the tower within or adjacent to an area designated as being an area of local scenic, historc, ecological or cultural importance? No. 7. Can the tower pravide the opportunity for at least {3) three other providers to co-locate? Yes, based on information from the applicant. Is the site currently served by existing roads and necessary utilities? Yes. 9. Ase the base and top elevation of the proposed tower relative to surrounding landforms and structures? The base of the tower and the self- contained utility building, within the proposed lease area, are consistent with the surrounding structures. The top elevation of the tower far exceeds the maximum height of any structure in this Electric Road Corridor. Site Laxout/ Site Appearance- The plans submitted by the applicant show a 35 x 35 leased area at the western side of the church property. The site is shown to be fully fenced with an 8 foot chain link fence and barbed wire. The concrete pad will be I O Y~ feet x 8 i/a feet. The pad will house a ,base transmission station, with room for an additional station to be added for additional providers. There is a 12 foot gravel access drive serving the site that ties into the circular gravel driveway .~ currently surrounding he church playground. There is currently electric service to the church property, and the plans shoe underground electrical service to the broadcast tower site. The tower itself is a 120' galvanized monopole design, with a total of {9) nine antennae panels mounted at the top in a triangular formation. The galvanized tower is non-reflective, according to the applicant. The total elevation of the broadcast tower, including antennae is 122.5 feet above ground level. The monopole tower is engineered to support (3) three additional providers. The fenced enclosure housing the equipment building will be visible from Electric Road. Access -Access to the site will be from Electric Road using the existing paved driveway serving the church. VDT has indicated that the e;~isting entrance to the church from Electric Road, which will serve the proposed tower is adequate. Alternative Sites Previously Considered -The applicant indicated that {2) two sites were considered prior to making application to Roanoke County for this proposed broadcast tower location. 1. Allstate Insurance Facility (immediately adjoining this proposed site) Failed because a lease was not granted by Allstate. 2. Showtimers Property {~,ocated in Roanoke City, across Electric Road from the Allstate Facility) Failed because the property was not zoned properly; and there was a direct adverse impact on adjoining residential neighborhoods. The applicant did not make an application to Roanoke City for a zoning change or Special Use Per:rut. The applicant has indicated that this specific site, at the requested height of 120 feet will be required to provide adequate coverage and meet the county co-location requirements. The applicant has also indicated that lowering the tower height is not a possibility with the Personal Communication Service (PCS) system that is proposed for this site. Visibilit~~ -The proposed tower has a total height of 122.5 feet above ground level. The base elevation of the tower (ground level) is 1195 feet above mean sea level. As a comparison the peak of Sugarloaf Mountain is 1 S00 feet above mean sea level, and the peak of Longridge is approximately 2500 feet above mean sea level. The applicant provided a computerized terrain analysis fora 100 foot structure at a ground elevation of 1170 feet. Based on the concept plan elevations and U.S.G.S. maps, that would indicate approximately a 45 foot deficiency in that visibility analysis map. The analysis mapping may be used as a guideline to indicate the possibility of the tower's visibility in the county, if there were no obstructions. The photo simulations provided by the applicant indicate a significant visual impact on the adjoining residential neighborhoods as well as the Electric Road Corridor. Community Meeting - A community meeting has been scheduled for Monday, February 1, 1999 at the Roanoke County Administration Center to allow the applicant to present plans of the proposed broadcast tower to the Oak Grove Neighborhood. A memo to the Planning Commission will follow from staff to give an overview of the meeting. C. c~~~l~c~ ~~ ~~ C~1~~'~~El~sr ~~~z~ „~ ~ C~ The site for the proposed tower is in the Transition land use area. Transition areas generally serve as developed buffers between highways and nearby or adjacent lower intensity development. Broadcast towers are not specifically addressed in the Transition area. Guideline ~6 references the intent to preserve, enhance and/or incorporate into the design natural site resources such as topography, vegetation, views to and from the site and drainage ways. Citizen input from the Visioning Process as well as the community meetings for the Community Plan have shown a need to protect scenic vie~~vs within the County. Roanoke County encourages applicants to exhaust all opportunities for the use of existing facilities as co-location sites. PAST I~ A. STAFF C'~l'~~~.~JS~C~~TS In providing coverage to the Roanoke Valley, Triton PCS, Inc, has indicated a willingness to pursue co-location on existing structures as a first strategy to continue their network. Staff has observed from previous broadcast tower uses that the public is less concerned when there are more co-location sites versus (1) one tall tower, especially in a primary road corridor. The applicant has indicated that they have exhausted their co-location attempts due to their engineer's data requiring this narrow "siting envelope", failed lease attempts and incompatible zoning. Staff views the height of the tower at 120 feet, at this proposed site to have a significant visual impact on the Electric Road Corridor, as well as adjoining residential neighborhoods in the Sugarloaf 1'~lontain area and would have a negative visual impact in the same residential neighborhoods in Roanoke City that presented negative reaction when the Showtimer's site was considered. Using the explanation given by the applicant for an unsuccessful attempt at the Showtimer's Property, staff views a 120 foot tower at the proposed site as having a direct adverse impact on adjoining residential neighborhoods. Staff recommends that the Commission see'.c an explanation from the applicant describing the "direct adverse impact on adjoining residential neighborhoods" in Roanoke City, and how this proposed location will differ from that site. The applicant originally met with staff to explore the option of a 6 - 8 foot rooftep antenna on the Altstate facility. Since a rooftop antenna location was an original possibility prior to this request, staff suggests the possibility of a series of rooftop antennae from the Ridgewood Farms area to the Sugar Loaf Farms area on the Electric Road Corridor as an option to be explored by the applicant prior to the Commission's approval of this request. Should the Commission recommend approval for the broadcast tower staff recommends the following conditions: The height of the proposed broadcast tower shall be made as a condition of the Special Use Pemit. 2. The tower shall be limited to a monopole design. A bond or similar performance guarantee, sufficient to ensure the removal of the tower and all associated facilities, shall be required as part of site plan review, prior to site plan approval. DEPT. OF PLANNING A.ND ZDN;NG 520li Bernard Dr. P.O. BGx 29800 RGancke, VA 24018 ( 540' 772-2068 FaX (~=01 77=-'=108 care revrzd,: i~ ~ceived by~ appiicatior z~~_~rCiE"a datz:,r-.~ IG I~~c date, Case iVurrtSer: ~neG:< type or appi,cat,cn tied IcheG!< a!I that apply}: I, ^ REZONING `b Sr=ECiAL USE COVARIANCE ~ Appiic~nt's na,~~e: Triton PCS, Inc. Fhcne: (804) 323-95001 Address: 9211 Arboretum Parkway, ~F200, Richmond, VA ~:P Cade: 23236 Cwner's name: Trustees of the Good Shepherd Church F~none: 774-8746 Address: 1887 Electric Road, Roanoke County, VA Zip Code: 24018 Lccaticn or prcper<y: Tax Map Number: 67. 18 ~-- / -~~ Good Shepherd Church 8 ,~~lagisteriai District: ~ , j~ ~ „~--~~ .~" ?.,~ a ~ "' 1 87 Electric Road (Route 419) ~ ~ .1~~~3 '';~ r ~ ; ~ ,, Roanoke, VA 24018 r !_ .,ommunity F Inning Area: Sipe GT parse! (s;: Existing Zoning: C-1 Office District 3.88 acres Existing Lane Use: Church ..169012.8 sq•-,• ,~ Rroposed ZGning: C-1 ~.~~a~-~ . ~ ~."~ ~ ~~C`' i '" ~ ~ FrGposa La ;d ~,~Sc: ' Tel)ecommunicat~ons Facility _: Sta Use ni y i - ~ ~ se ~ ape: 1 I ., it : Does the pare! meet the minimum Iet area, width, and Frontage requirements „~ the rpuested district' `(ES X NC IF NO, A. Vr'-.,=~IA,`~JCE IS FiE~~'IJIRED FiRjT. Dces the parse! ~m~eet the minimum criteria rcr the requested Use Type? YE~ g ,'~;C IF N'C, ?, V,~',~=i;=~~~JCc IS REQUIRED FinST. !` re_~ning request, are ccnditions being pro..e: e~ with this ~ guest? YES NO X ~ t t~ ~~ariarce 'G' Sa..ticnis) G. the F.canoke CGUnty Zoning Cry;nanc_ in c de: ,c. Is the =~p!,cat,cn _Gmpiete? Fleasa cheG.< ,r enccsec. A.FFL!CATIGN y~/ILL NC i St A ;CE? cD IF A.~~J~~ GF T~IESE ITE~~iS ?,,~ i~r11SS!NG CR INCGMFL~c. R/S V A15 V ~!5 V Consultat,Gn ~ 8 1 /~" x 7 7 " concept plan --~ ~~ Appi,Gation`cs `I ( A.ppiication ~ ,`vietes and bGUnds desGr,pt,cn Prorrers, Ii 'appliC3b!e 1 ~ JuSiITiCatlCn '<%`:~ `/Valet and Sc`/~er dpDIIC'a?iCn ! AdIC,nlnCs prGpefty GV`JrcrS l here^y cer-iry that / am eriher the o~.vner or the preoerry on t,`:e owner's age.~t or contract purc,~aser and am acting ~,virn the ,thew/eeg~ a~ry co-rr~enr of.t~`'f'o~i r'~~~~ ~' , O~n-net's Signature: ', t,~~i'r-'~=;~~~~ ~ ', race, .1r., Esquire, Attorney for Triton PCS, Inc. oEa ~~ I Imo` K ~ ~ ~„I ~ f ~ I ~ i-~ ~. ~ o~ ~ ~~i& g i ~I y ~i ~ ~ Y V~ N~ ~ ~~ _~ r~ o ~ ~ e p p 5 ~ ~ a f3 ~o~l - ~o ~' ~~no W WOaN 4I Z~_°a b Na 5u o~a oo~o IH _ z ~~ p~~u n N ~ ~ V ~ ad U J ~ m v r ~ ~ J p i n H C7 w p J ~O w w II ~ ~' _ ~ w Z a ti ~ J w rs> Y O ~ ¢ w I4 C/7 ~ a' 4 ~ ~ ~iil~ --_.-, O ~ ~ ~ g ' . ~ <~ - - `~ ° r ~ ~ C m ''1 ' ~.jy ~ r N '~ 9 e~ ~ 'a~ l r-. _". r ': ~_; m _, _! it a 1,, c i f F I r s.°w z oa z ~ o o u__- ~I_ ~r ° m ~ z ~ ~ ~f ~f r i i su_= °o ° lif o"~m a m vm^ cwWm -_ V .. G V~ ~. OZl a9 S4 NN31 NY NOllifl B 31OdON~W ,oZl M3N 11tl15N1 , 1. -_~r.f-~. - 1J > c3 <io ,q :J10 . O 3 ~ I wV ~W J m # Om -0 ° 41' I 9 '~'~ '3'z Z mo ~ ~' V x 2 ~ OFY ZV .-. 2 ~ 1 ~ ~ ~~ R Q ~~~ Op> s ~'in rc ; ~ ~' ~_ awa - .ma v p`s yam ~ \ ~ ~ ua a#~ ~ ~iv o~ < _ ~F~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ °~-J w~~NSo ~'~^ `~o ~ .p Sa xa ~ u~ Y i ~m ~ ~ az~ O l i `i^ I V I ~ I l z~ ~ ~ z c - _-J ~'~ z'"n ~ ~`~~4 ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ t - .-~c oio 2 a° u, \ ~¢ ~ o y~ ~ '~y aI Nv o mV~ 61y i m '~ ~~N Q3w nj- / boa ~jQ a ~ ;~ r-- _ ~~m L W ~' w~ o00 7 z =~ ~ m'~a .Z ..0-,t Z~ ~m ~= q -a L ~ •^ O 1 Z w ¢ as # s Z z .- v - WALL Q,.i °a~~ c is o~ z u ¢ "':o u away ,~ i~°o , um •a~ _ ~ z ~ mmu read ~a ~ \ ~w ~Q o~o~ ca~ i i _LL ~ y.. o, ~~~~ j ~; a ~ ~ ~3 ~-. a. i O / \% ~' O a ¢ ¢ , Q ~~ it ~~~~. W i aN`. _ t- ~ o U o °w -. - ~d T ` N uWZi I ~ v, ; z 1~ _~ ~ .... __ •\ u o u ~`-_' --_ 0 8 0 ~~H • "f U N O z~f 0101 Q ~'w Jla W Y, a o ~~ W z UI .. SIN .rs a 1 L ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~I I ~I I ~ ~ ~ I ~~ i ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ aA I ` , ~ a~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ - ~I ' i ~ m Q ~ ~ ~ O U , I ~ ~ 3 ~ > -~cB 3~ ~ t • - -1 ~ Ij~~~ I, ~ H ~. ~ - ~f ~~ ' ~. ] 111 ~ O U V'j ~ ~ i n ~ ~ ~ '' / ~ S `~' ~ I I W d I '. n I ~ ,n F ~~ CL ~ y ~ uJ ~ ~ i W Q tiJ ~ I ' 8' v~ ~ ~ I '"'c"v of-C l ° c< :~ z - s t71n (J ^~ ~ ~ C __ `; i LO! u_.. IiIW;i '. _ O _ Z ~OI ! ~I~~~= ~ -~ ~= / ~ ~ JCL x I -- I ".'I ~ CmC) ' _ i' ~ '~ __ ' 0 G~ C i.~ V-R ~~ILI~ III<; ^ ~ - W ~/ / I 0 W JoJY' N' - J'-~,~ a 3 c 1 l , ~ ~ :. Z; - te O ~ n _u~ ~o o ~ ~ - LL ~~N ~ _ _ O' ~~ b ~/~ a~\ ~~ /'~ ~ ~ ~~ cr' ~G „'Ht( V ~~" ~_, r~ ~, \ ~~ > , , 11 ~. ~ ey=e/ . ~~~ y ~~~.~ ^~~~~ ='su / -i ~~- i~r_` i :~~~~' ~--~ a~ 1 f \ \\ / ~j~ i ~~~\~ r I j' ~~\~~ // ~ \ ll:l ~~i-Na=~O S; S O w ~^S r. \ N .\ ~ - --- ~ \ \ ~ I ~,~ J ~\ I ,' \ 1 ~ -~ _w' ~~ ~~~ ~°s~ ! ~ 1 ~ ~ ~~z_~.. , ' 1 S / I F F•lEMEr1t ~ `~ 1,19 ti ~ / ~ ~~ ~-- ~-^- '~,JF / _ ' ~_` r / ~ - ~ ~ ~+ e m _ ` ..WObti -- 1200' _ ~\ _ ~ m W°~xa - `sa y's `~ mho / i. ~ ( x~ia I ~c= - ;_. . ~nmoo n ilk u0 m ~n a~ ~ ~ ~` .y 'a =m:.' OOY'w w O ~i3 in e~9 ~~ 5 ' a wm7rv`1 'nj ~ ... ._pZ ..a . F _ ~.d a~~C i~~ ' ` z~F ~~w z`o.~ e>,an ~ o . moo . ~ ,n~`i Nu~y s w ~ iv1.e ~W~ ~a 3o o _ W w i °`4~n i~W~'n' a~_r ° v J Y ['~~n' L~ c i - ~Ot<'r ~ "' ai :~in~o _m _ - = neg., ___ _ _: oau ~` ~ ~= w 'goLL sbo~ i. a' / ~S W ~a~ ~: ''~-~1~'(.7 --- r z1~ ` ~ S a~" ~wn,~ :oW~_ ~o,J.. _4 _Ui: ~'j~~ C vwi .emu : ~....Oe ,1 ~ ..~ ~~ ~~ u m ~i~ ~~ ~ it ~~ori oz.1 `" ~rv _:n z~r mm \\ ._~[[f~~ _ _.\3uOmUO~RC \ \ `~ I~ o ~ ~ `° ~ ~ ~~~o ~~ J~c"a 0 'se pH`1~m m~'F~- i m~, ~:o ~aW_~., 'x~; __~ ~ u '. S ~ ~ ~ ;~ W ? ,~ 3 b UI a. ¢ 5 n L11 ~. = -;~5 1`: 1 1 I~ n~ I ~ I I I ! III S ~ 4( ~ If7 -~ E n. e n N r~ a a 1 f C < ~ °~ ~.-~ .~~~.._ ~',M~. J • n ~ ^t e i v x _ _~~ m ~ .S ~~:- rn r 3 _1 z J _ j ~1 ~ n ~ ~ ^ c v 0 ~' ~ .~ m rn o ~ ~ J m o c!v ° f ~ c r7 ~ u v o ~ o -+ ~ n ~~ ~ 7 J L~ J - ~ 77 9 ~ .JAI ~ ~ L - U m C O O ~ - -- ~ UU l~ c o u ~~^^ III ~~ }~ ~ r ~ • • ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ s * • ' ' '4 ~ • ~+' ~+ t~ ~ Sw 1J' ~. ~. ~ • VL ~ . f ~• ti ~ '~ • y'. ~f Sir ~ !>! • s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -s 't s • s ti ~F.r Y e A r E L" A ~ ti > ~' . O C < ~ a. L ~ s ----T-- • ~1~. .., r r -r ~, 3 SJ C^ ~' ~ _- J C. ~y.. ^ C , ~ ~ _. I `~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ u C J - -J 'Y 'J (L Ln o V CJ (n. ^ . ~~ "F' • s ~ ~..~ Y ,. .~ t. ~~^ i '1 ~ '~~ ~. ~• ,rl • ~ '~ ~' t ~ ~ k~, ~ ~ ~~V ~ ~. ~ a ti • L'• ~ fS,',r ~ i f 1'4 r ~1e : ti ~"~ ~, ,.,.~ - AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 1999 ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO TRITON PCS, INC. TO CONSTRUCT A 120 FOOT CELLULAR MONOPOLE TOWER TO BE LOCATED AT 1887 ELECTRIC ROAD (TAX MAP N0.67.18-1-3), WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Triton PCS, Inc. has filed a petition to construct a 120 foot cellular monopole tower to be located at 1887 Electric Road (Tax Map No. 67.18-1-3) in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on February 2, 1999, and reconsidered this matter on March 16, 1997; and reviewed the Findings of Fact which are attached to this ordinance as Exhibit 1; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on February 23, 1999; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on March 23, 1999. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: That the Board concurs in the Findings of Fact attached to this ordinance as Exhibit 1; and 2. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Triton PCS, Inc. to construct a 120 foot cellular monopole tower to be located at 1887 Electric Road (Tax Map No. 67.18-1-3) in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1999 Community Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.2-2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved with the following conditions: 1) The maximum height of the proposed broadcast tower shall be 120 feet. 2) The tower shall be a monopole design. 3) A bond or similar performance guarantee, sufficient to ensure the removal of the tower and all associated facilities, shall be required as part of site plan review, prior to site plan approval. 4) The tower shall be designed so that an additiona120 feet can be added to the top of the pole for other users. U: \ W P DOC S W G EN DA\ZON ING\TRI TONGO. S HP A 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. U:\WPDOCSWGENDA\ZONING\TRITONGO.SHP 2 ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FINDINGS OF FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS arc , PETITION: Triton PCS, Inc. Good Shepherd Lutheran Church Site FILE NO. 5 - 2/99 Exhibit 1 Findings of Fact Supporting Denial of the Tower: 1. The broadcast tower is proposed in the Electric Road Corridor, in close proximity to the Sugar Loaf Mountain area of Roanoke County. The proposed tower would be highly visible to this primary comdor as well as the surrounding residential neighborhoods. 2. It is the official policy of the County to encourage and promote the co-location of antennas on existing public and private structures within the County. 3. When a new broadcast tower is proposed as a last alternative, the requested broadcasting tower location, height and design should be chosen to protect and enhance the scenic and natural beauty of Roanoke County. 4. The height of the proposed broadcast tower is significantly taller than any existing structure in the Electric Road Corridor. 5. Public comments from the County Visioning process as well as community meetings for the Community Plan indicate a desire from the public to minimize the number of new towers. 6. The computerized terrain analysis, provided by the applicant, was based on a 100 foot tower height and this specific request was fora 120 foot broadcast tower. The submitted information was unsuitable for this specific application. 7. The applicant indicated in their application that one of the reasons the Showtimer site in the city of Roanoke was not further considered was due to having a direct adverse impact on adjoining residential neighborhoods. Staff feels that this site will have a similar adverse impact on the residential neighborhoods in the County. 8. The applicant has a by-right option to improve digital signal coverage to this portion of the County. Roanoke County allows towers up to 30 feet in height, by-right, in commercial zoning districts provided the tower is a monopole design, and is located in an area already served by above ground utilities. ~" 8. The applicant has stated that the proposed height of the tower is partially the result of the chosen location. The church building partially blocks the digital signal, thus necessitating a higher tower height. 9. The 419 Frontage Development Plan encourages that the design of commercial sites including size, shape, and height and materials should compliment adjacent buildings. Exhibit 1 ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FINDINGS OF FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS arc , PETITION: Triton PCS, Inc. Good Shepherd Lutheran Church Site FILE NO. 5 - 2/99 Findings of Fact Supporting Approval of the Tower 1. The proposed broadcast tower is sited at an existing commercially zoned property. 2. The proposed broadcast tower is a monopole design having less of a visual impact than a lattice type tower. 3. The proposed site has existing utilities, thus reducing the need to have any additional impacts from tree or land disturbing for utility lines. 4. The site is served by existing road access from Electric Road eliminating the need to cut additional roads into the site. 5. The proposed tower site is not on a mountain side or in a Blue Ridge Parkway or Appalachian Trail viewshed. -.~ t~ ~ , AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 1999 ORDINANCE 032399-13 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 11.93-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED IN THE 2600 BLOCK OF RUTROUGH ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 79.02-1-23.2) IN THE VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF AG- 3 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF AR AND GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A 9-HOLE GOLF COURSE ON TAX MAP NO. 79.02-1-23.2 AND 79.02-1-21, UPON THE APPLICATION OF RANDALL WAYNE BROWN WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on November 17, 1998, and the second reading and public hearing were held January 26, 1999, at which time this rezoning was denied; and WHEREAS, on February 9, 1999, a motion to reconsider the denial of this rezoning was approved, advertisements of the reconsideration were published twice in the local newspaper, and this matter was placed on the March 23, 1999 agenda for reconsideration; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on December 1, 1998 and January 5, 1999; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 11.93 acres, as described herein, and located in the 2600 block of Rutrough Road (Tax Map Number 79.02-1-23.2) in the Vinton Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning 1 classification of AG-3, Agriculture/Rural Preserve District, to the zoning classification of AR, Agriculture/Residential District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Randall Wayne Brown. 3. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Randall Wayne Brown to allow a 9-hole golf course to be located in the 2600 block of Rutrough Road (Tax Map No. 79.01-2-23.2 and 79.01-2-21) in the Vinton Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1999 Community Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.2-2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved with the following conditions: (1) Lighting shall be limited to the last three holes on the golf course. (2) Height of the light poles shall be limited to a maximum of 24 feet. (3) Lights shall be turned off'h hour after sundown. 4. That said real estate (Tax Map No. 79.02-1-23.2) subject to the rezoning is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at an iron pin on the southerly side of Rutrough Road (Va. Sec. Rt. 658) said point also being the southeast corner of a 30 ft. right of way over that certain tract or parcel of land containing 0.48 acre as shown on plat of survey for Denise L. St. Clair of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court for the County of Roanoke, Virginia, in Deed Book 1048, page 583; thence along the southerly side of Rutrough Road with a curve to the left whose radius is 1,847.28 feet an arc of 318.65 feet and whose chord bearing distance is S. 50 degs. 24' 30" E. 318.25 feet to an iron pin; thence continuing with the south side of Rutrough Road S. 55 deg. 21' E. 428.20 feet to an iron pin; thence leaving Rutrough Road S. 55 deg. 19' W. 615.36 feet to a white oak; thence N. 40 deg. 29' W. 306.46 feet to an iron pin on westerly side of post; thence S. 47 deg. 38' W. 330.12 feet passing a double chestnut oak to an iron pin; thence N. 73 deg. 35 W. 244.80 feet to an iron pin; thence N. 34 deg. 07' E. 355.20 feet to an iron pin; thence with a curve to the left with a radius of 67.36 feet a tanger of 36.06 feet and whose chord bearing distance is N. 5 deg. 57' 30" E. 63.58 feet to an iron pin; thence N. 22 deg. 12' W. 158.87 recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court for the County of Roanoke, VA, in Deed Book 1048, page 583. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: 7 ~- Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Terry Harrington, County Planner John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney ~~gi3 ~,e,. ?'~~' prr~ x'3'0$, -i. `.~ 4 23.3 p~ ~~,3.a ~ 17 2.36 At ?°~'~ 1.06 Ac S~Q9 .5 ~ ?s+s 6 1.61 Ac 3 ~ 23.7 Z~•~ ~ap~ ~Q'' 4.47 Ac i.ssnc 1.54 Ac 5 . '~ ~~ ~ I.00 Ac~ ~~ - ti . ~ ~$~'i ~'~ ~~ ~. ~ ~ R -„Sf i 4.57Ac SD) 6, ~~,~ 2.0 Ac ~..~ ~ ~?;97Ac tC), S8 ~~ ~ s 2 j' ~ a~~~ assa ass- {~ 5 ~. ,~" 1 I.. "' .. 2.9E ac ~~7 4l /.~.~.. 5 ~. q ~ ~ ~ r 42 's 'S ,`(~ AC 1 ~ ~$~9 ~ ~,3 2.~ Ac t.00Ac 44 ~ ~ ~ ~ 3.fi5Ac ~~ 4 t.QO ~ 45 j 3.85 Ac 23.2 ~ 1 I .93 A `'s8r 18 2.00 Ac ,~'3 ~~.~ t ~~ ,~' I7 ~' 150Ac i ' ~ ~~ ` ~~ ~~ ~ 15 ~v~ 47 s.aoA~ 1zo2 Ac AN _ DEP.~R'Ii~'V'I' OF P?~ANNSTG g ROSJ N SIT E ~'~ ~ ,9. AND 2orrIrrc TAX MAP fi 79,02-1-23,2 t,~J ""' ~ ,.,, s- 7 Roanoke County Department of Community Development Memorandum TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Terry Harrington DATE: March 23, 1999 RE: Request to Continue Triton PCS Tower Request; Good Shepard Lutheran Mike Pace representing Triton PCS, just called to advise me that he is requesting a continuance for the Good Shepherd Tower proposal. He is on his way over to the County office building with a letter to the Board formally making the request. He wishes to present this to the Board during your afternoon session. I told him there may not be an opportunity. I advised him that the Board might not honor this late request, as the Board tries to avoid the last minute cancellation of hearings that are attended by citizens interested in speaking at the public hearing. r' 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~r ` AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 23, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: Reconsideration of the AG-3 to AR Rezoning Request and Special Use Permit Request of Randall Wayne Brown; Permission to Construct and Operate a 9-hole Golf Course Located in the 2600 block of Rutrough Road ~'OUN'1'y ADMIfNISTRATOR' S COMMENTS: Cep-'"'u The Planning Commission considered these requests on December 1, 1998 and January 5, 1999 and thereafter recommended approval of the rezoning and special use permit. The Board of Supervisors held a public hearing on January 26, 1999 and voted to deny these requests. The Board of Supervisors approved a motion to reconsider these requests on February 9, 1999 and scheduled a public hearing on the reconsideration for March 23, 1999 Staff recommends as follows: 1. That the Board of Supervisors hold a hearing and take action on these requests on March 23, 1999 .. 2 Respectfully Submitted, Approved, ll Terrance L Har ngton, AICP Elmer C. Hod e Departmen of ommunity Development County Administrator Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Ref erred to Motion by Harrison Johnson McNamara Minnix Nickens Vote No Yes Abs PETITIONER: RANDALL WAYNE BROWN CASE NUMBER: 34-12/98 Planning Commission Hearing Date: Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: A. REQUEST December 1, 1998 and January 5, 1999 January 26, 1999 and March 23, 1999 Petition of Randall Wayne Brown to rezone 11.93 acres from AG-3 to AR and obtain a Special Use Permit to allow a 9-hole golf course, located in the 2600 block of Rutrough Road, Vinton Magisterial District. (CONT. FROM DECEMBER) B. CITIZEN COMMENTS Richard Zue said that the previous staff report was not supportive of the request and asked if that is still the case. It was noted that the staff report was not changed but a memo was prepared after additional information was submitted which sufficiently addressed the Commission's concerns. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Commission asked for clarification of the greens cost. Staff replied that $25,000 is the total cost including the putting greens. In response to the Commission about construction, Jack Parrott, consultant, said that Mr. Brown will consult with the developer of Hanging Rock Golf Course; however, Mr. Brown has equipment and is capable of doing a good deal of the work himself. The Commission asked about lighting. Mr. Parrott said there would probably be a total of eight lights; height of poles will be about 24 feet; lights will be turned off'h hour after sundown. D. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS 1) Lighting shall be limited to the last three holes on the golf course; 2) Height of the light poles shall be limited to a maximum of 24 feet; and 3) Lights shall be turned off'/ hour after sundown. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Robinson commented that the request maintains existing open space; there is minimum tree loss; improves the appearance and maintenance of the property; should not hurt property values; provides another recreational feature for the County. He moved to recommend approval of the rezoning. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Ross, Thomason, Witt, Robinson, Hooker NAYS: None ABSENT: None S- ~ Mr. Robinson moved to recommend approval of the Special Use Permit with the following conditions: 1) Lighting shall be limited to the last three holes on the golf course; 2) Height of the light poles shall be limited to a maximum of 24 feet; and 3) Lights shall be turned off'/ hour after sundown. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Ross, Thomason, Witt, Robinson, Hooker NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report _ Other Terra~ice Harrington, Secret Roanoke County Planning Commission PETITIONER: Randall Wayne Brown CASE NUMBER: 34-12/98 DATE: December 15, 1998 PROPOSED GOLF COURSE CONSTRUCTION COSTS Removal of power lines: Mr. Bailey (800) 552-7001 Work order # 020695488 Lines to be placed underground between poles at cost of $2,800. Cost of road and parking lot per Tom Cumby (contractor) $5,000. Clubhouse construction: $25,000. Green development per Robert Coulter (~40) 947-2521. Mr. Coulter built Hanging Rock Golf CoLUSe. Sand base, gravel, file drains, and development for ten greens $25,000. ANNUAL MAINTENANCE: Fertilizer $5,000. Fuel and maintenance $4,000. Top dressing $1,000. Irrigation $2,000. Miscellaneous 00 TOTAL: $15,000 Staffing will be done by family members. We will be family owned and operated. INSURANCE: Coverage will be with Eades and Lower Inc.. Premium $1,726.00 annually for $1,000,000 coverage. Lighting information enclosed. Request that the last three greens be lighted. STAI~'I' REP®RT S PETITIONER: Randall Wayne Brown PREPARED BY: John Murphy CASE NUMBER: 34-12!98 BATE: 1211/98 PART I A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This is a request for a rezoning from AG-3 to AR, and a Special Use Permit for the construction and operation of a golf course. The request involves (2) two parcels, the first consists of 11.93 acres, which would require a zoning change and Special Use Permit for the proposed use, and the second parcel of .48 acres currently has an AR zoning designation, but would still require a Special Use Permit. Golf Courses are permitted in the AR Zoning District with a Special Use Permit. The property is designated as Rural Village in the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. The Golf Course Use is not consistent with the Rural Village designation in the proposed location. B. DESCRIPTION Randall Wayne Brown plans to construct and operate a (9) nine hole par three golf course in the 2600 Block of Rutrough Road. Golf Courses are permitted in the AR Zoning District with a Special Use Permit. Mr. Brown's general concept plan shows anine-hole golf course with a clubhouse and parking area. Mr. Brown currently lives on an adjoining parcel that is not designated to be used as part of the golf course. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS The definition of a golf course, as described by the zoning ordinance, is a tract of land for playing golf, improved with tees, greens, fairways, hazards and which may include clubhouses and shelters. Included would be executive or par three golf courses. Specifically excluded would be independent driving ranges and any miniature golf course. Golf Courses are perntted in the AR Zoning District with a Special Use Permit. Site plan review will be required. Virginia Department of Transportation approval is required for a commercial entrance permit. Well and septic permits will need to be approved by the Virginia Department of Health /Roanoke County Health Department. .• 2 PART TI A. ANAi,YSiS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Location - The properties are located in the 2600 Block of Rutrough Road, in the Vinton Magisterial District. Topo~raphv/Vegetation/Appearance -The topography slopes down to the south from Rutrough Road, slightly levels out near the center of the property at the intersection of (2) two small streams and then begins a gradual upward slope to the rear tree line. The majority of the land is cleared with the exception of some scrub vegetation lining both sides of the streams. The property is surrounded by a wooden stockade fence that was used, by a previous owner, to secure horses that grazed on the property. In addition there is a wooden horse corral on the eastern side of the property located near the tee-off area for the number six and eight holes, as they appear on the concept plan. There are several utility poles on the site with lights generally located near the center of the proposed course. The existing gravel drive serving the property also serves a barn near the back of the property, which is not visible from Rutrough Road. The rear of the site is covered with mature hardwood and evergreen trees. Surrounding Neighborhood - The neighborhood consists of a mixture of uses. The most common use is for {1) one acre plus lots with single family residences. The property to the west of the site currently supports a house and includes a barn with horses. The lots to the south or rear of the site are large acreage parcels, some with residences. To the east and north of the site are residential lots, with the exception of an I-2 zoned property currently housing Stacey's Tree Service Inc. which is immediately across Rutrough Road from the proposed golf course. A. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Layout/Architecture - The basic concept plan provided by the applicant shows the location of the tees, and fairways and a proposed clubhouse and a parking area tightly situated on 12 acres. The concept plan is deficient in several areas. There is no reference to architectural design or size of the clubhouse. The parking area shown is only slated to handle 26 vehicles. The minimum parking requirement just for the golf course, according to the zoning ordinance, is 50 parking spaces, and additional spaces may be required for additional uses (retail sales at the clubhouse, etc.). A stormwater management area will be required with a project of this magnitude, but is not reflected on the concept plan. In addition, with the streams that merge on the property, a flood study may be required prior to any final plans for building placement. Access /Traffic Circulation - Access to the site would be from an existing entrance along Rutrough Road. The entrance would need to be redesigned to meet the commercial entrance standards of VDOT. The latest VDOT traffic counts for Rutrough Road at this location, measured in 1994, are as follows; on Rutrough Road from the Roanoke City Limits to Randall Drive are 1866 vehicles per day and from Randall Drive to Sha-al Road (just prior to the Parkway Overpass) are 1611 vehicles per day. Currently the entrance and access road to the site is gravel. s- ~ 3 The site development standards will require a (20) twenty-foot minimum width driveway from the commercial entrance to the parking lot. The minimum parking standard for a golf course is 50 spaces. Both the access drive and the parking area shall be required to meet a Category I surface (pavement) in accordance with the standards in the Parblic Street ar2d Parking Design Standards and Specifications. Proposed Operations Plan- A business plan was not filed as part of the rezoning and Special Use Permit application. In discussions with staff, the applicant was not sure if the proposed golf course operation would be seasonal or year-round; unsure of hours of operation; undefined size or appearance of the clubhouse; or if there would be any other uses associated with the clubhouse, such as retail sales or food service. The applicant described the traffic impact on the neighborhood as no more than 15 to 20 vehicles per day. Staff sees this projection as unrealistic and grossly underestimated based on other traffic studies for similar uses. Fire & Rescue/Utilities - Fire and rescue services will continue as they currently exist. The site is primarily served by the Mount Pleasant Fire and Rescue Station. C. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The site is designated as Rural Village in the 1985 Comprehensive Plan. Policy RV-4 of the Comprehensive Plan recommends the concentration of community parks, outdoor recreation sites and community facilities such as fire and rescue stations and libraries. Currently in the Mount Pleasant area these uses and services are located in the Route 116 Corridor. The golf course is not clustered with these uses and therefore is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. PART III A. STAFF CONCLUSIONS Prior to the Planning Commission acting on these petitions, staff recommends that the applicant clarify the following: • Architectural Design of the clubhouse • The hours of operation • Seasonal or year-round operation • The use of exterior lighting Staff has concerns about the rezoning and Special Use Permit for the project. Staff met with the applicant to address several issues related to the project, as listed above, and to date has not received thorough explanations. The concept plan appears to be over simplified for the high- maintenance use proposed. Without sufficient, detailed information on the project and without the conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, staff is not supportive of this rezoning and Special Use Permit request. J ~ -. r'l ~ r+-. PETITIONER: Randall Wayne Brown ,,,' ,~ +-~ CASE NUMBER: 34-12/98 DATE: 12/1/98 ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT We know that a storm water management plan will be required, as well as a grading plan, approved architectural plan and entrance and road plans. However, these are expensive, and since they will be required in order to get construction permits, we felt that it would be prudent to get our rezoning and special use permit prior to engineering. BUSINESS PLAN Hours of operation:8:00 am. to Sunset. We plan to operate the course year round, 7 days a week, weather permitting. One option to stop crowding would be to require a tee time for players and space them 10 minutes apart. The only other plan of operation would be a small retail sales of golf accessories (golf balls, tees, hats, etc.), snacks and drinks. We have no plans to change the existing lighting. PROPOSED ACCESS AND PARKING DEVELOPMENT The access and existing entrance will be upgraded to meet the entrance standards of the Virginia Department of Transportation. The current width of the entrance into the property is an average (1$) eighteen feet. This will be change to a minimum width of (20} twenty feet for the driveway leading to the parking area. The driveway as well as the parking lot will be surfaced treated as required. If parking becomes an issue we have more than enough room to accommodate the (50) fifty vehicle minimum. With a required tee time we do not see this being a problem. '"'' PETITIONER: Randall Wayne Brown CASE NUMBER: 34-12/98 DATE: 12/1/98 PROPOSED COURSE CONSTRUCTION With the existing lay of the land it does not appear that the fairways will require any land disturbance. The average green size will be 1,100 sq. ft. topped with bent grass. The creek beds need only to be cleaned out by removing the scrub trees and brush. .~ ~t .. ", ;r"_.~ ~- _' i,7 ~-'=: _. ~, - _ k~ s ~ `' _,i ~. - __. __ ______ __ . ~~z~v ~~~ ~-y I Address: ~; . Zip Code. Location of property: Tax Map Number: ~ ~~ ~;~ ~ ~ ~--~, ~ „ ~ `~ ~, ~ ,~ : ~ ~. T ~ ~'~"• `'~ ~~ ~ G Magisterial District: > l ~ ~~N Community Planning Area: ,-- ,....---' Size of parcel {s}: Existing Zoning: p''~ ~ ~- acres Existing Land Use: sq.ft. ~~ ~'~. ~- :,:,;~,;;,;,;,,,;;,,,;,;,;;~,„:;,;:,,,,::,1 ,:,:::,,,:,~, ~>f Proposed Zoning: ~ ~r Starr use only Proposed Land Use: use Type: ~ , Owner's name: ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ L.~• ~l ~'~ >~ >~ n Gam` ~' Phone: ,S ~~ ' ~~~~` - ,' COUNTY OF ROANOKE~ ~`~'~'" ~ ror star'f use only ,.~ --~ DEPT. OF PLANNING AND ZONING dace received p received d~>-s° +, ~~ ~ . . i ~~~ ~~~ ~ 5204 Bernard Dr.~.. ~ ~ ~, j appiicat~n fee P.,lBZ,~ d e:, ~ t„ ~~ ~ P.0. Sox 2°800 ~ '~ ' ~.,` ~~ `~~ ( Roanoke, VA 24018 p4aca es ~ssu eo EOS dace '~ ~ ~f,-~ (540 772-2068 FAX (540 1 772-21 G8 Case ~dumoe,. ~ ~ ~ ~ ( ~° ~ - - -- ` i ~'~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ `~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~'"~'1~~ ~`~ ~~ ~iiiii'iiiii'''`i~~~~'~~~i'.~~ii: i i1~!ii Che type of application file (check all that apply}: REZONING ~ SPECIA,L USE VARIANCE P.pp(icant's name: ~~~,j Phone: „~ ~~.~` ~`°~°"± ~~-~• ~ ~"~~~'~~' ~ 9~~ Zip Code: Address: r ,, 1 Does the parce( meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? YES ~. NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parce! meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? YES ~_ NO IF N0, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. if rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? YES NO :..i.~:'~rtilY~iYEihEi!'~~~1~`.~33~'a~ii~t`•`•~~~.:~~::.~..'ii;~i`~..~~~.~ i~'iiiiii%;iiiii?~~~iEii_;;is`'?;>;(!E;(:'..E``;'asi?ii~`_~Eii'i~'sE 'l 1' ~~~i. f11r~ .. .. .. .... V ttL 7-I-/-C L+t l1i /'Sf Y li S.Cf'L[Y ( ~ t Variance of Sections} of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT 8E ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. _ , , Rrs ~ v ws v ws v ~/'j Consultation 8 1 /2" x 1 1 " concept plan ~~ Application fee y~ Application ~'~~ Metes and bounds description - Proffers, if applicable a,% Justification ~~`=~~ Water and sewer application Adjoining properly owners I hereby certify that l am either the owner or" the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge andc , s~e~nt of the owner. Owner's Signature: ~ '"'"`'~~"~ ~~ .~*-. ` / ~dayne Brown Estimated Construction Cost: $ 47,000 Impact on Neighborhood: I don't see much of an impact factor other than cleaning up the site and improving the way the land looks now. Vehicles and equipment will not be in plain view from the roadway. I have spoke to and have been approached by several people in the area and they all have been happy to hea=that a golf Bourse might be built in this area. As far as any year round activity, I won't know until I see how responsive play will be. Future Plans: I have no future plans for expansion. I will be using most of my land for these nine holes. Traffic: On the subject of traffic in the area, I don't feel that more than fifteen to twenty more vehicles a day would travel to the site and some of these are likely to already be driving by to and from home, Most golfers travel in pairs or groups. Reason for Zoning Request: Some of this property is already zoned for A.R, All that is needed is to move the zone line to the property line. If you have any questions or need any additional information plwase call me at 342-4022. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, Randall Wayne Brown f ~.. l.i l ,_ , _. , % _ . f .. i _, .I,~ ,\ ,. _ Y ., _.__.~ :' ,\\ ~ \.\~~ -fir,', _ a}• _ ~~~, ~ ~ / ~ ~~ ~ ~'___~. I / SSG '~~ \ \ ```~ a.\ ~ i' .~. ~ ~~ ' r ~~ L ~ ` ` \\ \ ~„d r ~ S i Tn.,. 1. :~ \ _ __ ~~ ~,. 1/ ~^~ 1 ~{/ % . \ ~ ~~ 1 ~ r, ~ ,, i f.. ~ r, ~ ~ _ -- ~ 5 ~ ~ ~ ~.. r ~ ~ , \~ `, j ,`` ~. . o,w DEP.~R'I:~'iVT OF P?~NN1NG g ROW N SIT E ~_~ AND ZONING TAX MAP rr 79,02-1-23,2 ~""' ,~ ~ '~ '" ~I AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 1999 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 11.93-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED IN THE 2600 BLOCK OF RUTROUGH ROAD (TAX MAP N0. 79.02-1-23.2) IN THE VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF AG-3 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF AR AND GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A 9-HOLE GOLF COURSE ON TAX MAP NO. 79.02-1-23.2 AND 79.02-1-21, UPON THE APPLICATION OF RANDALL WAYNE BROWN WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on November 17, 1998, and the second reading and public hearing were held January 26, 1999, at which time this rezoning was denied; and WHEREAS, on February 9, 1999, a motion to reconsider the denial of this rezoning was approved, advertisements of the reconsideration were published twice in the local newspaper, and this matter was placed on the March 23, 1999 agenda for reconsideration; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on December 1, 1998 and January 5, 1999; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 11.93 acres, as described herein, and located in the 2600 block of Rutrough Road (Tax Map Number 79.02-1-23.2) in the Vinton Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of AG-3, Agriculture/Rural Preserve District, to the zoning classification of AR, Agriculture/Residential District. 1 ~~ 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Randall Wayne Brown. 3. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Randall Wayne Brown to allow a 9-hole golf course to be located in the 2600 block of Rutrough Road (Tax Map No. 79.01-2-23.2 and 79.01-2-21) in the Vinton Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1999 Community Plan pursuant to the provisions of ~ 15.2-2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved with the following conditions: (1) Lighting shall be limited to the last three holes on the golf course. (2) Height of the light poles shall be limited to a maximum of 24 feet. (3) Lights shall be turned off '~ hour after sundown. 4. That said real estate (Tax Map No. 79.02-1-23.2) subject to the rezoning is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at an iron pin on the southerly side of Rutrough Road (Va. Sec. Rt. 658) said point also being the southeast corner of a 30 ft. right of way over that certain tract or parcel of land containing 0.48 acre as shown on plat of survey for Denise L. St. Clair of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court for the County of Roanoke, Virginia, in Deed Book 1048, page 583; thence along the southerly side of Rutrough Road with a curve to the left whose radius is 1,847.28 feet an arc of 318.65 feet and whose chord bearing distance is S. 50 degs. 24' 30" E. 318.25 feet to an iron pin; thence continuing with the south side of Rutrough Road S. 55 deg. 21' E. 428.20 feet to an iron pin; thence leaving Rutrough Road S. 55 deg. 19' W. 615.36 feet to a white oak; thence N. 40 deg. 29' W. 306.46 feet to an iron pin on westerly side of post; thence S. 47 deg. 38' W. 330.12 feet passing a double chestnut oak to an iron pin; thence N. 73 deg. 35 W. 244.80 feet to an iron pin; thence N. 34 deg. 07' E. 355.20 feet to an iron pin; thence with a curve to the left with a radius of 67.36 feet a tanger of 36.06 feet and whose chord bearing distance is N. 5 deg. 57' 30" E. 63.58 feet to an iron pin; thence N. 22 deg. 12' W. 158.87 feet to an iron pin; thence with a curve to the right whose radius is 50.00 feet, a 2 ~ ~ w 'D' O d4 ~ ~' 'fir ~ o~ Q' ~ ~ ~ w v p g ci Fr •', ~ o ~ h ~ Q ,r ~ O . fi ao ~ c ~ 'a ~ '~' a k; ~ ate, ~ aa, -~ • ~ ; a; 'y o ~ ~ o ro tea, ~ ~ , ~ ~ "~ W m J Tip ~ a, c~ ~, w ~ 4, y a, 'Q '~ O' a, a~ .om ~cCaJ s ~ `~1 ~ ,x, 3~ a'o, y g`a ~ 'O ~ o o ,.C ~ ~C ~ w o "C o a, O ~ ~ a+Y ~~ NQ) • ~ ~~ ~O ~ a~ ~ ~ rm ~ ~'~' ti a fi 40 3~ y ~ ~' ° 40 ~ ¢, ~ ~ w ° qb° ~ c~ , ~ ~ moo ~~ ~ ~~~~~ o~~ °~~ I °~,aa~ a1~ ~'£'~o~N~ ° ono ~ ,°~,O~~i`a,~ 's',C4~,,s ~~ Q! ~ v ` ~ ~J tT! ~V +.,~% y S~ y ,~ Rf w ,C '~ °~J 4 cps ~ ~ ~p w ~ ,L ;' c p ~!I ~ ~ '~o ~ ~ o~ ~ a~~ .~o ,off' ~ •~ ~ N ~ ~~ ti ,~ 40 :~ 3 w ~C ~i~ ~ a e, ~' w ,~ ro r~ 0 0 0 ro w ~`~ -C cy R~ ~ _ ~~ e G fi ~ aj .~ ~~'t~ ~ ~`w~r `• ~ ~~ p ~fi O ~, ~ ~ «~.; fi, .; ~ ' ~~ ~+.. I ~Y ~ iv-' ~t ~~ ~ GO~ ~~ ~ I y ~~ Q 4 ~~ O ~ 3 w.~ ati ~. • m ~ a _ ~w ~. o ~ yv; o0 ~~ ~ Dios ~~ Hwy y~ oac 3m o ~ ~° a° 00 _, - ~~ y ~Vai ~ wrp y° ~' i y ~ a'' '~ a, f ,~~ ~~ a, ~ ~$' ~o$ ~~ `~ O ro ~ •$ N a~ 50 ~ ate, a, ~a. o ,C a~ ' ' ° O . , ,~, •C cC ~ tip o}~ v •$ O a ~ O O ~ w ~ ~D O ~ ^~' a, ''~ -. ~~° . ~` d ~ ~_ o -o'' ¢~ '~ '~ '~ g 4~ 'b' .w Rf ro ~ ¢, O w ~C, ,'~' C ~' `a ate, ~ 4 ~ ,~' '~' fi b~ w ~ ~ „ '~' '~' ' °~ '~ ~ °~ ~ O AO c~' "~. ~.' c~' b '~ ,'4' 5' ~ cb ~a~ ~'.a~' ~ ~ ~ c~' -_ :~~ ~ ° a ~' ;~~ '~ •,°' ~` o m "~ ;~'`° ro ~, `~ °' ro ,~, rho $~"o b~ o fi ~ ab, r~'~. ~`:,~ -, ~ vaY~ ~.'~ ~~ ._ ,'~" W :; ~,~~~o!~°, ~~ ~~' ~ 'a°g~ ~~.ti°~ ~ '~%' ;4C,' .y'~' -C Q~~ e'~ ~ ~ ~ o-~~ •'Rf ; ~~;~$~0 ~ fi"' ~c~', y.'a' ab, ~1' ~ (~ °q ;~,~Q~ ~0~ ~~~?' ~, , ~° O RI' A` '.~i ~v ;~ ~C Q ;iti ~ ~ ~i, ,~ off" ~ ~ .1~' '~ ~~~ '~ °~ ~ ~' a, $ ~ 4° 'Q.a~ ~`~ ' ¢,- ~ -O w. $' ~ •4 ~•,'~ "'~~ b 4 ¢~ ~^C' ¢~ r t~ c$ o '~~y9 ~Z1 {. ~, ; ' ~ ," C,.' y J, ~, Q+ b ~ O '~, '~ . O ti O w ~ C+ ,0 O , c~ Q~ '~ ~j~"" ,~ C ~Y °~ 'ti ~ m ~ ~w`b°'~ ~' y - ~ . ~ O ~, Pr _ `~ ~='4 O~ ~+~4; Qi 4, ^C'..~,J ¢i y Q ~ Q,S' °J 0 -,, ,~ v~~'~ o '~o~''~~'~ +- ,~ ~ ~ : ' ado ~° ,$,~ ~ y ~~ ~° ~ $~°~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ~° ~~°Os ~`~, ~ ~` ~.~;~~; - ~ , ~' ,~~, ,cam ;~ fi ~~,~$' ~, ~: ~ o ,moo ; 3 a ~ ~. ~e ~e ,:.. o~ a,. ~ "b w 4~ o b w m o ~, .:w ~ S~ ~o ~~.a ~"~,,, ~~ msg. ~',m.`~'b ~ ~Q o .v 4° '~ '~" g`' w^C' ~' '~; ~ w `S` .,~ ~~ ,~'° ~' ¢, ~+ ,~~'.~C ~ ''~ ° b~~,°'' afi' ~ w~' ^~ 0a ~'~ '~. OJT ~ . x,94 ~~o~~ ,~ ~~~ ~w~~fi o.;:~ ~~' b ~ 4 ~~ , 0 ..~ ~g~y¢, ~ ;,?~~<:. d~ ~ ~~-.~ ~c1 ~' PJ ~, ~ {~I , ~ ~fAo ~ i .1111 i ~! `~"IllZ~'S Y._..~ , WMIW.rOanOI4@.COm The Roanoke Times, Friday ;This 2s a great beginniru,~,'Roanoke na2cseum's executive director sags h,The turn-of-the-century `'' paintings v~rere purchased far w,~the'Art Museum of Western's-~, Virginia by the Horace G ` , I Fralin-.,Charitable ,Trust. ;, ~,. _ By KEVIN KITTREDGE ~:.~. THERO.~voxETrMES; ~._ _• ,~ .' The Art; Museum of Western ::Virginia on, ;Thursday announced '4'the'.;liurchase'; of« three ° tdp-flight, ~'~turn-of=the-century„~,American~~ ~,; ; paintings,'with more;;to come '•'. .. Tkte paintings, unYeiled..Thurs •; t°~'day iri;the museum's upstairs gal-.I levies,-;are John H Twachtman's . .;t ,,"Wildflowers," Edward . Potthast's; ; ~'"Happy''Days""and "The;Rose" by' ,` Mariel~0,akey~Dewing y r'° ,'. Ali' were; purchased.' fdr the :, rf museum by'~~the Horace`G=F4•alut ,Charitable~,Trust'' ,revealed;. ~~Thursday`!for' the. first .tune as a ~;;rtt~jor'new'art museum donor •' ~~'; ~~ f"~ H'~race, Fralin was a' Roanoke Vail~y-~cievelopei~Rand,president of _ _. ~ o ' i~ '`~ 1893:"Tlte' trust ~' ''~he establishedin ~~' ; his lifetiine'~ is ~i ~' now ~ adminis- t ,, tered .,by his ~ ~ ~ younger brother, Heywood .; P`ralin, `t its sole trustee. x'° ~."We~have ~to' ` begin to ;Heywood : ; .. . ';Fralin „develop ;,a new i : ~; : collection for the art' Museum,"; said Fralin, , :who ~spo~Ce at a Thursday morn~iig news ~on~'~''ai1~~~~to anncunck,the acqui- u~„sitionsl.He maid he•hops§ others will ~• come forward to help: the museum ` ~°as well: "Niy challenge to all of us is 1 `Let's make it happen.' ~ ~~ :.`'These are heady times for the ~tzr}useum, yxhich is', contemplating a i~ move out i;of ~crampecl ~ quarters -iii ~ t~ie~ main., ~ Center ; in the:' Square IG;buildittg on the Rdanoke City Mar-' ke~';and into' the; Grand Home Fur- 'nishinixs ~ building ~ a`! few, blocks museum,' has ;been :donated to C~nter'in the Square. '. ;. ' Irk addition, the museum has other donors in the wings,;and has loktg `anticipated receiving some `si~iificant -works of .19th- and 'i • early 20th; century American art. i That period. is the museum's col- lecting priority. ' "i=~ `Museum executive director Judy Larson called the museum's. nfw~','pairitings "an auspicious beginning. ~.. When we move totour'new. museum space, we w~ll have' a collection in which all ~ citizens ~ of Roanoke can take pride „ ' .•+~,~ Tt'is unclear how many more paintings-the trust will buy. for the ~:it~useum Fralin declined to say ,,hQw.much the.trust would spend '0>1 the museum, or to characterize • __t~fund's assets.... • .;'°~~Hut iFralin, ;an ,art collector ~. himself, did not rule out piirchas- ing;: works by~,such.:well-known turn-of-the•cen~ury: artists, as American.;impressionist;Msry C,~satt for the museum, and said he,yvould love for. the museum to hang a .work by John ,:Singer r ~~~i",If you lopk ~~ back. 10 .years frc„lyltanow," he,.said of the. muse- ' uifl'a,collection, "I think,ygu'll see a•~uge, huge difference.",,, a . y. That; ~ building,' with .four ~ ti tees the. current space of the art Museum unveils 3 major acquisitions All of the paintings presented Thursday date from the decade before and the decade after the turn of the century, and fit under the loose heading of American Impressionism. ~; Such paintings are among the most highly sought after -and the ~ most expensive - in 19th- cetitury American art, Larson said. `These paintings are needed to fill- a gap in the museum's collec- tio11, she said. "The impressionist ' paintings are the highly coveted paintings, so it makes sense we wdiild not have a lot of them. It's art ~ important area, and this is a gr~~.t beginning." She said all three paintings w~t'e purchased in New York City in' December. Two are from gal- ; levies; the third, Potthast's ' "Happy Days," was sold at auction ' by Sotheby's. "Neither Larson nor Fralin would give the paintings' prices, bii~' Sotheby's revealed that "Nappy Days" sold for $160,000. Nor' was "Happy Days" the priciest. Larson said the. Twacht- man painting was the most expensive of the three. • By contrast, Asher B. Durand's "View Near Catskill with Round Top," a prized museum acquisition under Larson's prede- cessor, Joanne Kuebler, was pur- chased for $40,000 in 1995. The Fralin trust has contrib- - uted' to other arts and cultural ` projects in the Roanoke Valley, > including the Jefferson Center. In ~' 1996, the foundation contributed *' $760,000 to Explore Park -the largest private donation the park had ever received. _~_ ___ The current effort to beef upl the museum's permanent collec- tion began with a lunchtime meet- ing between Larson and Fralin last summer. Fralin is the chief execu- , • ~tive officer of Medical Facilities of ~"~ "America Inc. He also is the father ` of museum board member and' ex-board president William The painter John Twachtman is a personal favorite of Larson's. She arranged an exhibit of his works for the High Museum in Atlanta. Larson was curator of American art for the High before _coming to_Roanoke. That show included "Wild- flowers," which now will be cred- ited to the collection of the Art Museum of Western Virginia. 'Itvachtman, like the French impressionist Claude Monet, loved to paint gardens and often painted his own, Larson said. "Wildflow- ers" is one of those works. Maria 0akey Dewing, wife of the painter Thomas Dewing, con- centrated on still-life paintings and floral imagery. She won med- als for,, her paintingsand had a one-woman show at tihe Pennsyl- vania Academy of the Fine Arts in 1907 - a rare honor for a woman March 19, 1999 at the time. Her painting "The Rose" shows a young woman looking at a faded rose, perhaps demonstrat- ing the transience of youth and beauty. Edward Potthast concentrated on landscapes and beach scenes, and the museum's new acquisition is one of the latter. "Happy Days" shows a group of children playing at the edge of the surf. All of the paintings may be seen in the museum's second-floor galleries at Center in the Square. Kevin Kittredge can be reached at 981-3323 or kevink@roanoke.com Maria Oakey Dewing's "The Rose" shows a young woman looking at a faded rose. All of the paintings may be seen in the museum's second-floor galleries at Center in the Square. Fralin.. ..~`4. At their lunch, a3 LarSOn COURTESY OFTHEARTMUSEUMOFWESTERNVIRGld recalled it, Fralin said "Let's build :dward Potthast's "Happy Days" was bought at auction at Sotheby's in New York City. Sotheby's revealed an American collection together." hat "Happy Days" sold for $160,000. The other two paintings were bought from private galleries. Potthast "I can't imagine a more excit-;onceritrated on landscapes and beach scenes, and the museum's new acquisition is one of the latter, ing thing for a director than. for'howing children playing In the sand. someone to say, `Here's a pot of money -let's go buy paintings,' " said a jubilant, Larson after the news conference. COURTESY OF THF, ART MUSEUM OF WF.STE/tN Vltty/n'!A John Twachtman's "Wildflowers" was the most expensive of the three paintings. Museum officials, however- declined to dive the price. ~~ tangent of 31.35 feet and whose chord bearing distance is N. 9 deg. 53' 30" E. 53.13 feet to an iron pin; thence N. 41 deg. 59' E. 419.91 feet to the Place of Beginning and being 11.934 acres as shown on survey dated February 12, 1976, recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court for the County of Roanoke, VA, in Deed Book 1048, page 583. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\ZONING\BROWN.RAN 3 • Rand-Wayne Brown 2603 Rurirougn Roaa ~coanoke virginia, 24014 i540~ 42 %-i~l~s The attached information was provided by the Petitioner. PROPOSED • NINE HOLE GOLF COURSE ~~ • • • i '; t 1` :s_ ^~` . ~ ~ F = ~~ r ~ t ~ 7 7 ': t, t' ~ .~ ,` t J y 4 2 ~_ .... .. _ \' :~ ~ ~~~ j 4 ~, _ ' I, n ' ,' •~ ~ ~ i. J,~...R 1 ~ f ~ j ~. ~' t~ C a:; ~ "z'~` ~~t; {' z, < - 'yam; . ~ \ ,,, ,~ 'Y ` ' ~`' ~ ~ ~i. r~ L ~ ., 1 ~ c '~ ~~. l! , ~~ iX { i ~ _ I t . ~ ~~ ~. ; ~ T.. ~# ~~ '.i (~ ~ -sec ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1~ ~ S _ r ;t ~ . S \ ~ '~ e. _~ ~~ ~ ' .. . ~' ~~ 19 _ f~ y '~ j r ~ ,1 + ~ `.i: r- t .~ c ~ ~ ~ 7~ t ~ - ~' 4 ~ . • .,\ ,\, _.-~ '\ ~ .. ~~ ,~\ •,~ ./ . 4 / \! 1` ' • s_ 7 • ~= HILL STUDIO, P.C. PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ARCHITECTURE ROANOKE VIRGINIA USA Founded in 1988, Hill Studio, P.C. is amulti-disciplinary firm located in the Blue Ridge Mountains. This small business enterprise brings together an experienced team of individuals in the fields of urban planning and design, landscape architecture, and architecture, all pursuing a goal of quality landscape architecture and land planning for the Commonwealth of Virginia and other parts of Southeastern U.S.A. We use a team approach on our projects, involving several disciplines from within our studio and outside consultants to create the best possible product for our clients. We frequently participate on large multi-disciplinary project teams. Using a project-architect system of management, we are able to undertake a variety of projects within the framework of a small organization. The range of our projects includes regional planning to residential-scale works. AREAS OF SPECIALIZATION: • Site Selection Land Use Planning Landscape Architecture Park Planning Parkway and Park Design Streetscape and Graphics Planning Methodology Municipal and Commercial Architecture Landscape Reclamation Historic Preservation Many of our projects involve grants preparation and performance and professional contributions to the knowledge base of the building industry. We work with our clients to achieve distinction for their projects. AWARD-WINNING PROJECTS RURAL SETTLEMENT PLAN Master Planning and Site Design for the "Rural Settlement Plan," this 80-acre PUD for Woodland Development Corporation of Clairfield, Tennessee was awarded the 1989 United Nations World Habitat Award. Contact: Marie Grillo, President of Woodland Corporation - 615-784-5303 INTERSTATE 81 VIEW PLANNING PROJECT View Protection and Design Guidelines for the 72 interchanges along the 328-mile corridor through Virginia, this 1992 project won Merit Awards from Virginia ASLA and Virginia APA. Contact: Mr. Wayne Strickland, APA, Project Coordinator 540.343-4417 "THE BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY" Critical Exhibition on the Design and Construction of the Blue Ridge Parkway. Show premiered at Harvard University, showed at the National Building Museum and toured the Nation 1993-1995. Winner of 1993 ASLA Honor Award for Communications. • Contact: Mr. David Chase, Director of National Building Museum 202-272-2448 BLUEFIELD MASTER DESIGN PLAN A 28-block Downtown streetscape and interpretive plan for Bluefield Main Street Corporation, Winner of 1990 Distinguished Design Award by Main Street Bluefield Contact: Dr. Stuart McGehee, Archivist, Eastern Regional Coal Archives 304-325-3943 FOR MORE INFORMATION: HILL STUDIO, P.C. •••• 120 Wcst Campbell Avenue •••• Roanoke, VA 24011 USA •••• 540-342-5263 , ~ DAVID PLUNKETT HILL ~ „~ ,,,,, Landscape Architect ' Education: Harvard University • Master of Landscape Architecture with Distinction -June, 1988 Charles Eliot Fellovr of Landscape Architecture - 1988 Virginia Polytechnic Insti;~te and State University Bachelor of Landscape Architecture -June, 1984 Stanley Abbott Award, Virginia ASIA Honor Award for Undergraduate Studies Sigma Lambda Alpha, Tau Sigma Delta Honor Societies Honors /Awards: National Association of Counties Honor Award - 1996 National Association of Development Organizations Innovation Award - 1996 Blue Ridge Parkway /Wolf Creek Workshops Project Team Virginia Preservation Foundation Honor Award - 1996 Hill Studio Buildings - 120 W. Campbell Ave. Renovation, Roanoke National Trust for Historic Preservation Honor Award for Preservation - 1996 Virginia Downtown Development Association Honor Award - 1995 Hotel Roanoke and Conference Center Renovation Protect Team Virginia Society AIA Honor Award - 1995 : Forest Middle School Project Team Virginia Downtown Development Association Honor Award - 1994 Danville Train Station /Virginia Science Museum Project Team Virginia ASLA Merit Award for Planning - 1993 & Virg(nia APA Merit Award - 1993 Interstate 81 View Planning Protect Virginia ASLA Honor Award - 1993 : Blue Ridge Parkway Exhibition United Nations World Habitat Award - 1989 : Woodland Community Project Team Louisiana ASLA Honor Award - 1986: Site Signature Method of Land Planning • Registration: Louisiana, 1985, Virginia, 1986, Tennessee, 1989, North Carolina, 1992 West Vir inia South Carolina (tem 1992 1993-1994) Geor ia 1993 g , , p. , g Appointments: Virginia Downtown Development Association Board - 1996 - 98, City of Roanoke Arts Commission 1994 - 97, Virginia Tech Design Center Board - 1990 - 96 Downtown Roanoke Urban Design Committee - 1988 - 90 Experience: Mr. Hill has served as President of Hill Studio since 1988. Prior to founding Hill Studio, he was Project Manager with Caplinger Groupp, Ltd., in New Orleans, Louisiana. Previous work experience includes 1984 projects as Apprentice Landscape Architect with Caplinger Planners/Perez Associates, New Orleans. Mr. Hill also worked as an apprentice with Paolo Soleri on the Arcosanti Project, in Mayer, Arizona in 1983 and as 1982 and 1984 Intern Landscape Architect with the National Park Service, Blue Ridge Parkway (n Asheville, N.C. Academic Appointments: Mr. Hill has been appointed as adjunct faculty member In the History Department at Roanoke College, in the Landscape Architecture Program, College of Architecture and in the Humanities Program, College of Arts and Sciences at Virginia Tech. His courses Include subjects on the Evolution of the American Land, Cultural Evolution of the Appalachian Landscape, and Design Studios. Guest Lecturer: Mr. Hill has been Invited and keynote speaker at conferences dealing with the cultural evolution of the regional landscape. Typical subject examples: Heritage2: Past examples of Heritage Landscapes -VPISU Heritage Keynote - 1994 Interstate 81 -Enhanced Development for Tourism - W ern VA Leadership Symposiun-1993 Appalachian Heroes as Indicators of Appalachian Space -Appalachian Consortium - 1987 Eastover -Incremental Reasoning with City Hall" - LAR Week, VPISU - 1986 • The Site Signature Method of Land Suitability Planning ,Univ. of Arizona - 1985 Guest Critic: Mr. Hill has served on academic and awards juries at Rhode Island School of Design, University of Virginia and Virginia Tech Exhibitions: The Blue Ridge Parkway: Critical Analysis of the Parkway's Design and Construction December, 1988, Gund Hall, Harvard University Graduate School of Design March, 1989 - Boston: t~tassachussetts Gallery of Transportation 1990 -The National Building Museum, Washington, DC 1992 - 1996 -traveling the USA DAVID PLUNKETT HILL Landscape Architect Comprehensive Martinsville, Virginia City Comprehensive Plan Parks Plans: Parks Component for Comprehensive Plan for 20-year Comprehensive Plan Responsibiirty: Project Landscape Architect Martinsville, Virginia Parks Comprehensive Plan Parks Vision Cocument and Masterplan based on Comprehensive Plan Responsibility: Principal in-charge Christiansburg, Virginia Parks Comprehensive Plan Parks Vision Document and Masterplan based on Comprehensive Plan Responsibility: Senior Landscape Architect Big Stone Gap, Virginia Parks Comprehensive Network Parks Vision Document and Masterplan as component of Downtown Plan Responsibility: Principal in-charge Mill Mountain Zoo Master Plan, Roanoke, Virginia Master Planning, Workshopping and Phasing for 20-year buildout period Responsibility: Supervising Landscape Architect .® Roanoke River Reclamation Protect, Roanoke County and Salem, Virginia Land Suitability Planning for a 4500 acre River Corridor Responsibility: Author/ Project Landscape Architect Blue Ridge Parkway, Virginia and North Carolina Revised Land Use Planning for 7000 acres of Parkway Corridor Responsibility.' Intern Landscape Architect • Representative Blue Ridge Music Center at Fisher's Peak, Virginia /North Carolina Parks Pr•ofects: Master Plan for $12 Million Developed area of National Park Service Blue Ridge Parkway Responsibility: Task Manager , Project Landscape Architect Dan Daniel Memorial Park, Danville, Virginia Landscape Assistance to City in Master Plan for Recreation Complex Responsibility: Supervising Landscape Architect Lake Spring Park, Salem, Virginia Master Plan and Cost Estimate to restore Victorian Park Responsibility: Supervising Landscape Architect Smith Mountain Lake Park, Pehnook, Virginia Master Plan for 40 Acre Park in Lake Location Responsibility.' Project Landscape Architect Phase II - Waid Recreation Area Park, Rocky Mount, Virginia Design for Passive and Interpretive Facilities in Mountain Cove Location Responsibility. Project Landscape Architect River Center, Roanoke, Virginia Parks and Recreation project to Create Interpretive Center and Park Responsibility: Project Manager o/ Pre-planning Work Hofauger House for Virginia's Explore Park, Roanoke, Virginia Master Plan for Historic Reinactment area including gardens and plantings Responsibility Supervising Landscape Architect Scout Island at Brechtel Park, New Orleans, Louisiana $1 Million Park including scout camping and picnic areas, lakes, artworks and parkway. NORD Improvements, New Orleans, Louisiana Miscellaneous Recreational Renovations to Samuel Square, Evans Park, & OlivePark Responsibility: Project Landscape Architect S-7 ROBERT M. COULTER SUMMARY OF PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE • 1979 to 1983 ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT, The Homestead Resort, Hot Springs, VA. 1983 to 1985 HEAD SUPERINTENDENT, The Homestead Resort, Hot Springs, VA. Responsible for administration of department with 50 employees. Budget over $1 million annual expense. 54 holes of championship golf, including The Cascades, ranked in top 30 U. S. courses by Golf Digest. Maintained over 400 acres total turf and landscaped hotel grounds. 1985 to 1990 HEAD SUPERINTENDENT, Hidden Valley Country Club, Salem, VA. Responsible for all turf and landscape maintenance at private country club with 18 hole golf course. Developed and implemented 5 year plan for course improvements, including total replacement of golf course irrigation system. 1990 to 1993 HEAD MAINTENANCE SUPERINTENDENT, Hanging Rock Golf Course, Salem, VA. Responsible for finish grading, seeding, and turf establishment on upscale public golf course development. Provided all working documents for course construction costs and equipment purchasing plan. Supervised outside irrigation and electrical contracts. Worked through appropriate agencies with regard to permitting process. Implemented erosion and sedimentation control plan. 1991 to 1993 HEAD MAINTENANCE SUPERINTENDENT, Hanging Rock Golf Course. Responsible for all outside maintenance at upscale public golf course including daily set of course, irrigation programming, and equipment maintenance procedures. 1993 to 1995 OUTSIDE SALES REPRESENTATIVE, Egypt Farms Inc., White Marsh, MD. Served central and southern Virginia temtory, and southern West Virginia. Assisted customers in specifying greens construction and bunker sands. Designed customized fertilizer and chemical application programs. • ,~- _ `yy' ~i/ r 1994 to 1997 IRRIGATION CONSULTANT, Aqua-Flo Inc., Chantilly, VA. (part-time). Provided technical and design expertise to customers. Provided sales leads to employer. 1994 to 1997 INSTRUCTOR FOR INTRODUCTORY TURF SCIENCE AND LAWN MAINTENANCE, Virginia Western Community College, Roanoke, VA.. Developed curriculum and taught classes for both casual students (homeowners) and degree candidates. 1995 to Present SALES MANAGER, Butterfield's Inc., Montvale, VA. Led outside sales effort, including lease and service contracts. Increased sales of turf equipment division approximately 300%. 1992 to Present CONSULTATION SERVICES FOR GOLF RELATED BUSINESS. *Big Lick Driving Range and Golf Learning Center, Roanoke, VA. Mariner's Landing Golf Club, Huddleston, VA. Cliftondale Country Club, Clifton Forge, VA. Needle's Eye Golf Course, Monterey, VA. • Cedar's Country Club, Chatham, VA *Meadows Farm Golf Course, Locust, VA. *The Hollows Golf Club, Montpelier, VA. *Greenway Creek Golf Club, Glade Springs, VA. Country Club of Culpeper, Culpeper, VA. *Kastle Greens Golf Club, Midland, VA. Aquia Harbour Golf and Country Club, Stafford, VA. *Longview Golf Course, Galax, VA. *Denotes new greens construction C] ' ~. • Community Benefits I. Recreational Opportunity A. Family oriented. B. Special opportunity for youths and senior citizens. C. Affordable for average citizens. D. Help to meet local demand for weekend tee times. II. Aesthetic Values A. Maintain open space. B. Groomed turf area, neatly maintained, "Curb Appeal" for local neighborhood. C. Precludes further/denser development. • III. Environmental Benefits A. Turf is the b~ erosion deterrent. 1. Permanent. 2. Absorbs/filters run-off water. 3. Wildlife habitat enhancement through "edge" concept- possible cooperation with Audobon Program. IV. Economic Benefits A. Increase local tax base. B. Diversify local economy. C. Provides additional low-cost recreation for Roanoke Valley residents at no cost to the county. f,=~ x~17~~ ~~~ ~OD~ ~~~~~1 NTGp~ -Ci'~~d'~A 24'73 Feb. 5,1999 Tim Chocklett Golf Coach William Byrd High School 2902 Washington Ave. Vinton, VA. 24179 540-890-3090 To whom it may concern; • I am writing the letter in support of the proposed new golf course on Rutrough Rd. It is being designed and built on the land belonging to Wayne Brown, at 2603 Rutrough Rd S.E. Roanoke Co.. As a Golf Coach and an avid golfer, a new course on the area can only be a help. There are limited numbers of full size courses in the area and only one other par 3 course in the Roanoke Valley area. Anew addition will give players a choice, which may be closer to the area they live. The natural beauty a golf course can help beautify the area and help promote beautification and landscaping to the surrounding area. We, at William Byrd High School, hope to utilize the facilities provided to us. Through the Physical Education Dept. and the Golf Team, students will frequently visit this new course and use it's facilities when appropriate. We hope they will involve our students and hire them as part time workers. I hope that this letter will show you that I support the design and building of a new golf course in the area. If you have any questions or concerns I can help ,you with, please don't hesitate to contact me. Thanks. Sinc ely, • Tim Chocklett W.B.H.S. Golf Coach O~ POAN ,~~` ~ ~ -- ~ ''' z ~ z o a~ 1839 AGENDA ITEM NO ~ ~ APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~~. CbrvS,~~~~Or~ o ~ ~~ ~~ ~IJ~4-1~~. ~ ~ cC~~...~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ~IDDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/IVES LISTED BELOW; ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: /~~~ ~-r~~>,/ ,~~, ~~ '~~=~~ ADDRESS: c ~d~<~ ~ ~~~/~~~~~`i ~r;/, PHONE:(~~~ ~ Via' ~ '~l~f~ O~ POAN ~~` ~. , ';:. 9 ~: z' o Z v :~ .a 18 8 AGENDA ITEM NO. S ~` ~ APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: A+~ aG~p~r~~rvcE ~~ ,~~~zc~~E 1 J .~3 ~t2~~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AHD ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW; ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~l m~ C~A-1 ti -T ADDRESS: X101 M~~~oO ~Q 2v~/c~ PHONE: 3 ~ ~- ~y~~ o~ Poaw ,~F` ti. .9 z ~ o Z a 1 39 AGENDA ITEM NO. S -" APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~~~ (~NS1 ~t~~ ~ ~'~ O(l.Dlti~4-ryC~T-o (~% 7, c~tiC l I .cr 3 r"~-CC;~%J. would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW; ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the Individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~/~' ~}'L~. ~~(lry/y~_ ~~ly~'~ PHONE: ~~] - f ~~ `~ O~ ROAN ~~` ~ °, o-. 9 z c? o v a 1838 AGENDA ITEM NO. APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~d ,'c~~iS~ ~'~tfi~ n~ ~ 4 ~l/`f,I~UC~. 7zJ ~ Zc~oU~ )(q 3 fl C.~Z/FS I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW; ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~,~(~ ~.~~ ADDRESS: ~J ~~ 5 ~ . ~ rho /C-~.,. PHONE: ~~ ~ - ~~~ O~ POAN ~~` ~. ~ ~{r. ~ o Z v a 1839 AGENDA ITEM NO. S " APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS _-~ SUBJECT: - C-'' ~ ^~ ~ ~~-- ~~ `w ~ 5 ~v I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW; ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~ ~ v ~'\ u. ~- ~~~-'-~ - ~_ ADDRESS: `~- ~ ~' (, _~ ~~ ~ ~'ti - ~~ '~,~ c=~ ~~ _. ~`\ ~~ PHONE: ~-~~ ~-`~ Ci C>G' ~ O~ POAN ~~` '~ . - ~, A ~ d ~ o Z a 1 38 AGENDA ITEM NOS"~ APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: lL~("~SrDF~~~ a'~ ~n eD~ry~yc+E: ~ ~Z~,,;,~ I I. ~ 3 ~4c2~s I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW; ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. . ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ADDRE PHONE O~ AOAN ~F6 ti~, .~ Z c~ o Z a 18 8 AGENDA ITEM NOS APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~~C.C~NS~~.~o~ of-~f~N o~LDle~lfrNC¢; ~ro u20c?u~~ 11.x.3 I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW; ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~ ~~`~ \ ~~ ADDRESS: ~~~lC~,r"~-~~ _. PHONE: `~ ~ `I~ G~~7 t ~ ~~~~ O~ QOAN ~~` z `' c' _ ~ ~~ o ,Z AGENDA ITEM NO. 1 38 APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: 1~/CC4nlSi(,~,,2.A~/a~; Q~ ~ o,~'l~A~c~ m ~c7U~1~. II.~i39~,~-. f would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW; ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~ ~ /a- ADDRESS: .~ J / 3 /r U7~~~~ ~e ~ ~~~~ PHONE: ~"~~ ~~ v~ ~ y O~ QOAN ,Y~` ~ - ~,, 9 z o Z v; a 1 38 AGENDA ITEM NO. S APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: I~-t~Cd~s~0~,2A~K~~y c~ ~ ~ ~~1/~At~c~ ro ~ ta~~ ~1.~ ~ AGES I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW; ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. . ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~0 ~~ CO C ~C,-t~~- ADDRESS: )~ .7 7 ~~?T "~J ~~.ls (i. ~ ~(~ lc. U ~- PHONE: ~'~~-~~aZ ~ `'~ ,~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 1999 ORDINANCE 032399-14 VACATING AND CLOSING AS PUBLIC RIGHT- OF-WAY A PORTION OF GARMAN ROAD (RT. 929) SHOWN IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 51 (CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT) WHEREAS, Roanoke County and the Kroger Company (Topvalco, Inc.), the Petitioners, have requested that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, vacate and close as public right-of-way a portion of Garman Road, measuring fifty feet (50') in width and 0.16 miles in length, extending from West Main Street (Route 11/460), being shown and dedicated on plat of Fort Lewis Estates, recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Plat Book 3, Page 51; and, WHEREAS, the Kroger Company (Topvalco, Inc.), is the owner of the parcels of land adjacent to Garman Road, said parcels being designated on the Roanoke County Land Records as 55.03-3-3, 55.03-3-4, 55.03-3-5, 55.03-3-6, 55.03-1-20 and 55.03-1-21, in the Catawba Magisterial District; and, WHEREAS, §15.2-2272.2 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended) requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by §15.2-2204 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), and the first reading of this ordinance was held on March 9, 1999; the public hearing and second reading of this ordinance was held on March 23, 1999. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That a portion of right-of-way, situate in the Catawba Magisterial District and known as Garman Road, measuring fifty feet (50') in width and 0.16 miles in length, extending from West Main Street (Route 11/460), as shown on plat of Fort Lewis Estates, recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 3, Page 51, be, and hereby is, vacated and closed pursuant to Section 15.2-2272 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), subject to the following conditions: a. That a perpetual water line easement, twenty feet (20') in width, and extending southeasterly from West Main Street (Route 11/460) a distance of 0.16 miles, to construct, install, improve, operate, inspect, use, maintain, remove, monitor, repair or replace present or future water lines, pipes, facilities, system and other necessary or related structures, appurtenances and improvements, together with the right of ingress and egress thereto from a public road, is hereby reserved and retained. The location of said easement is shown and desig- nated as "20' WATERLINE EASEMENT BEING RESERVED BY ROANOKE COUNTY" on the plat entitled 'A Portion of Garman Road - To be Vacated and Waterline Easement -Being Reserved by Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia' prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C., dated March 4, 1999, attached hereto and made a part hereof. b. That fee simple title to the centerline of Garman Road shall vest in the owners of the abutting properties as provided in §15.2-2274 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), subject to the above-described water line easement and subject to the condition that the vacated area of land shall be added and combined, by deed or by plat, to said abutting properties, in compliance with the Roanoke County Subdivision and Zoning Ordinances, and other applicable laws and regulations. c. That all costs and expenses associated herewith, including but not limited to publication, survey and recordation costs, shall be the responsibility of the Petitioners; and, 2. That the County Administrator, an Assistant County Administrator, or any County Subdivision Agent is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such 2 actions as may be necessary to accomplish the provisions of this ordinance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 3. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption, and a certified copy of this ordinance shall be recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in accordance with §15.2-2272.2 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended). On motion of Supervisor Harrison to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~- Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment 3 ~' ~~\~ 0 O 5e ap 55.09 ~ 1 100" ~~ \~Q i . ~~~ ~~~~~RO • FO~ P [ 20, ~,G~,~GA'(~ ~e~5 3.61nA~c ,, TRUCK WASH .+~ 2/ 2. g ,e~•~' A 2~, 1.00, Ac. 4.05 Ac. e 21. 22 ~. "`S d ~ ~ `b 3740 M ' ~ ^ ~';i KROGER OF CE F . CENTER ~a~n ~''i;'~' 1. ,'~ N 5° 3.75 Ac. N ~,'' • ~,FMU u ~ % 13 INN'. I . s. 9. ~' .. .~ ~ °~ 1 ~~Q~~ ~ /~/ µa! ~S.µ ,o~•" ~~,~ g.~, ~a~y' 10. ~ '~ ~~' 11. = . 'u"° 12. 13. ~ ~ ~ C 0~ y • e m y q9 ~.,a 14. , 35J~ e. i.o4 Ac ,~ .m Jl 9~ 3.4$ AC 9ti~ B N R 24. 2.65 Ac 23. 3.42 Ac KROGER WAREHOUSE PROPOSED ADDITION SHO yYN IN GRAY DESCRIPTION: GARMAN ROAD LENGTH: (1) 0:2 ~ miles RIGHT OF WAY.• (>) 50/s0 feet varies PAYE~ENT fl'IDTH: (1) 3s feet SERVICE: {>) REPLACING EXISTING ROAD 25. 5.94 ~AC.(p) 5.20 Ac. C \~ r ROANOKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROAD ACCEPTANCE & ABANDONMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OF GARMAN ROAD ~ 55.03 ~ ~,au' ,m ~- 8. 7. J . 4,73 Ac. ~ 1 6 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER'~~' c~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 23, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: REQUEST TO VACATE AS PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY A PORTION OF CARMAN ROAD RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 51, FORT LEWIS ESTATES SUBDIVISION IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT, ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: L~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The petitioners, Roanoke County and Kroger Company, are requesting that the Board of Supervisors vacate as public right-of-way a portion of Garman Road and retain portion of rights-of-way as 20 foot water line easement. County staff is recommending that the Board of Supervisors approve the attached ordinance. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: On January 28, 1997, the County funded the reconstruction of Garman Road to align with the intersection of Route 11/460 (West Main Street) and Allegheny Drive. This road project was needed to improve the existing drainage situation along Garman Road and to provide improved access to Kroger's new Vehicle Maintenance Facility and Mid-Atlantic Distribution Facility. As part of our Performance Agreement with Kroger, Roanoke County agreed once the new road was constructed and ready for VDOT acceptance, that the old right-of-way would be vacated in order to remove the encumbrances on the Kroger property. The rights-of--way to be vacated is a portion of Garman Road (Route 929) as shown on the attached map (Exhibit "A). Once the rights-of-way is vacated, the property will be divided and combined with the properties adjacent (Kroger) pursuant to the requirements of Title 15.2, Chapter 22, Code of Virginia, 1950 (as amended) as cited in Section 15.2-2274. +-.,~ - •. Roanoke County staff has received no objections to this petition and requests that the described rights-of-way shown on the attached map (Exhibit "A") be vacated in accordance with Chapter 22, Title 15.2-2272(2), Code of Virginia 1950, as amended. Staff requests that this vacation is made subject to the County reserving a 20 foot water line easement as shown on the attached map (Exhibit "B"). A first reading of the proposed ordinance was held on March 9,1999; a Public Hearing and second reading is scheduled for March 23,1999. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: County staff is requesting that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors approve the second reading to vacate the rights-of-way as described earlier and to instruct the County Attorney to prepare the necessary ordinance with the condition that a 20 foot water line easement be retained which is shown on the attached map (Exhibit "B"). SUBMITTED BY: A?rfold Covey, Director Community Development Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: pc: Paul Mahoney, County Attorney APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator VOTE No Yes Abs Harrison Johnson _ McNamara Minnix Nickens 2 EXHIBIT "A" w \J \G `7~eeL qa2 it ~i~'~ t ~ 3 \ W t00 3454 ~e$~' 7~T r~+ t p w.5, 1 V O 146 ° 5. P; O Se.. tvla 55.09 '\ 53 too5~ 5}q4 U,~~ 8. ~~. P ~oo~ 1 100' tour" 10. w 9 N9m J ~` 11. 7. .~ ~t o 4.73 Ac. 5 12. ~' A \oo ,.. '~~ s ~. 13. ~ q ~ ,\ o . a \ ~ ` ~~~~ ~ ' m 9`0 q5 ~ P,,~ ~,QN ~ ~14. y ~ 1 `G .~ 35/0 B. 6 `Y RG~ ': 1.04 Ac ~~ • (~d ~~ yo 3.48 Ac ,~1p. 20. ~, ~}, QF ,1` t ~ 3.6 7 Ac B g2 2t yo ~\~~~GA,~~O a . G N 3760 O O ~{~ 4. N TRUCK WASH a ~ 25. N z, e a' 2.6° Ac 5.20 Aa C 6 2. 3_ ,~'' A Zqz ~, 1.00, Ac. q 4.os Ac. ~? 5 ~~ a 21. ~a~' ° <~, 23. N p 3790 NR 3.42 AC KROGER 0 FCE "~ F . CENTER ,a~'' 374, 1. G~tc1e 3.75 Ac. °^' 6. am ' 2 J G3~~aS1 2a5 J~ tgt 2 3. t9a 7' KROGER 25.i5 A~. z52 WAREHOUSE laab ~ 8. 9,< N j3 ~ _„ ~ ~ ~• PROPOSED ADDITION SHOWN IN GRAY DESCRIPTION: GARMAN ROAD LENGTH: (>) 0.21 miles RIGHT OF WAY: (1) 50/60 feet varies PAVEMENT WIDTH: (1) 36 feet SERVICE: (1) REPLACING EXISTING ROAD ROANOKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROAD ACCEPTANCE & ABANDONMENT CDMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OF GARMAN ROAD 55.03 ~UTE~11 U 5. AP~~S~ 11 ~~6o(R~ vPR / TAX ,¢55.03-3-3 ~N/F PROPERTY OF TOP!/ALCO, /NC. D.B. 1515, PG. 663 LOT 21 TAX ,¢'55.03-3-4 PROPERTY OF TOP~ALCO, /NC. D.B. 1515, PG. 663 ~ ~E ~3'309~' N 5~• NEW TRACT A " TAX j55.03-1-20 ~ PROPERTY OF \ D o TOP t/AL CO, INC. "t', 0. B. 154J PG. 961 ~\ N \m 1p D O~ \~ m ~ TOTAL AREA TO BE VACATED z BOUNDED BY CGWNERS \~ 1 INRGIUGH 5 TO 1 `; ~ .~ 37, 470 .SF. Leh 2WC~S a ~~~s ~~m ~~ .~ ~ \ O O.B60 AC. / \ ~ ~ ~ ~ P~ / a ~ ~,,~~Ew rRACr 'a" \ / \'$ ~y TAX ,~'S5.03-1-21 ~/ PROPERTY OF LOT 22 TOPVALCO, INC. V' FORT LEW/S ESTATES" O.B. 1549, PG. 1559 P.B. .~ PG. 51 \ TAX X55.03-3-5 \ PROPERTY OF ~ D.B. 515, PG'N663 ~ i~/ I ( LEGEND l l EX. EX/SANG D.B. DEED BOL7YY PG PAGE P.B. PUT BOAY R/lY R/GHT-q~ WAY AC. ACRES .SF. SQUARE FEET N/1- NOW GW FCU4MERL Y LOT 23 TAX ,¢55.03-3-6 v PROPERTY OF O.B. 1515, PG. 663 NOTF.S'- 1. A!/S PLAT WAS PREPARED INA~/AUT ASE BENEFIT Ole A CURRENT RILE REPLWT AND A~/ERE MAY EX/ST ENCUMBRANCES NOT 57101NV HEREUM. 2. A/E PURPOSE CAS A//S PLAT /S TO VACATE A PL~4AON OF CARA/AN ROAD. ,~ A//S PLAT /S BASED C31/ A CURRENT f1EL0 SURLY. / PLAT SHOWING O / ~, J~ ~~ C-1 DEL TA = 25t77'.~3" RAO/US = ,6'2.00' TANGENT = 80.67' LENGA~ = 85875' CHD. BEAR/NG = S .~:~630" E QYORD = 157.48' `~~ S 1670 37' E 48.69' -14.75' A PORTION OF GARMAN ROAD - TO BE VACATED AND WATERLINE EASEMENT - BEING RESERVED BY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA ~~w~x of Lr~ SITUATED ALONG U.S. ROUTE #460 & #11 ~~ ~ B ~ EE~~ ~. CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT v HENDEftSON, JR ~ ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA ~,a,_- (j~1~~Qti. No. 1480 I_ SCALE 1" = 100' DATE: 4 MARCH 1999 LUMSDEN ASSOCIATES, P.C. ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS-PLANNERS ROANOKE, YIROINIA rnu.~.J ,.. ~" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 1999 ORDINANCE VACATING AND CLOSING AS PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY A PORTION OF GARMAN ROAD (RT. 929) SHOWN IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 51 (CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT) WHEREAS, Roanoke County and the Kroger Company (Topvalco, Inc.), the Petitioners, have requested that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, vacate and close as public right-of--way a portion of Garman Road, measuring fifty feet (50') in width and 0.16 miles in length, extending from West Main Street (Route 11/460), being shown and dedicated on plat of Fort Lewis Estates, recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Plat Book 3, Page 51; and, WHEREAS, the Kroger Company (Topvalco, Inc.), is the owner of the parcels of land adjacent to Garman Road, said parcels being designated on the Roanoke County Land Records as 55.03-3-3, 55.03-3-4, 55.03-3-5, 55.03-3-6, 55.03-1-20 and 55.03-1-21, in the Catawba Magisterial District; and, WHEREAS, §15.2-2272.2 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended) requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by §15.2-2204 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), and the first reading of this ordinance was held on March 9, 1999; the public hearing and second reading of this ordinance was held on March 23, 1999. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: ~.~_~ ,' 1. That a portion ofright-of--way, situate in the Catawba Magisterial District and known as Garman Road, measuring fifty feet (50') in width and 0.16 miles in length, extending from West Main Street (Route 11/460), as shown on plat of Fort Lewis Estates, recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 3, Page 51, be, and hereby is, vacated and closed pursuant to Section 15.2-2272 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), subject to the following conditions: a. That a perpetual water line easement, twenty feet (20') in width, and extending southeasterly from West Main Street (Route 11/460) a distance of 0.16 miles, to construct, install, improve, operate, inspect, use, maintain, remove, monitor, repair or replace present or future water lines, pipes, facilities, system and other necessary or related structures, appurtenances and improvements, together with the right of ingress and egress thereto from a public road, is hereby reserved and retained. The location of said easement is shown and designated as " 20' WATERLINE EASEMENT BEING RESERVED BY ROANOKE COUNTY" on the plat entitled 'A Portion of Garman Road - To be Vacated and Waterline Easement -Being Reserved by Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia' prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C., dated March 4, 1999, attached hereto and made a part hereof. b. That fee simple title to the centerline of Garman Road shall vest in the owners of the abutting properties as provided in § 15.2-2274 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), subject to the above-described water line easement and subject to the condition that the vacated area of land shall be added and combined, by deed or by plat, to said abutting properties, in compliance with the Roanoke County Subdivision and Zoning Ordinances, and other applicable laws and regulations. c. That all costs and expenses associated herewith, including but not limited to publication, survey and recordation costs, shall be the responsibility of the Petitioners; and, 2. That the County Administrator, an Assistant County Administrator, or any County Subdivision Agent is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as maybe necessary to accomplish the provisions of this ordinance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 2 ,. ~~ ~ ... 3. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption, and a certified copy of this ordinance shall be recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in accordance with §15.2-2272.2 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended). G:WTTORNEY\VLHWGENDA\ROADS\GARMAN.ORD 3 i S - `~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 1999 ORDINANCE 032399-15 VACATING AND CLOSING AS PUBLIC RIGHT- OF-WAY WASHINGTON ROAD IN PINKARD COURT SUBDIVISION SHOWN IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 363 WHEREAS, the Petitioner, Lowe's Home Centers, Inc., is the owner of the lots in Pinkard Court Subdivision and the properties fronting on the southwest side of Washington Road in said subdivision; and, WHEREAS, the Petitioner is in the process of developing the properties for a retail business in the County of Roanoke; and, WHEREAS, the Petitioner has requested that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, vacate and close Washington Road as public right-of-way, said street having been created and shown on the "Map of Pinkard Court" recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 363; and, WHEREAS, a portion of Valley Avenue, all of Pinkard Avenue, Meadow View Road, Booker Road, and Summit Avenue, and all alleys in Pinkard Court Subdivision have been previously vacated pursuant to Ordinance # 021098-9; and, WHEREAS, Washington Road is no longer required as a public right-of-way; and, WHEREAS, §15.2-2272.2 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended) requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by §15.2-2204 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), and the first reading of this ordinance was held on March 9, 1999; the public hearing and second reading of this ordinance was held on March 23, ~ + 1999. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the public right-of-way, situate in the Cave Spring Magisterial District of Roanoke County, shown and cross-hatched on Exhibit A attached hereto, and referenced as Washington Road, created on plat entitled "Map of Pinkard Court", recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 1, Page 363, be, and hereby is, vacated and closed pursuant to Section 15.2-2272 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), subject to the following conditions: a. That fee simple title to said road shall vest in the owner(s) of the abutting properties within the subdivision as provided in §15.2-2274 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), subject to the condition that the vacated areas of land shall be added and combined, by deed or by plat, to said abutting property, in compliance with the Roanoke County Subdivision and Zoning Ordinances, and other applicable laws and regulations. b. That all costs and expenses associated herewith, including but not limited to publication, survey and recordation costs, shall be the responsibility of the Petitioner, Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.; and, 2. That the County Administrator, any Assistant County Administrator, or any County Subdivision Agent, is hereby authorized to execute such other documents and take such further actions on behalf of Roanoke County as may be necessary to accomplish the 2 provisions of this ordinance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 3. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption, and a certified copy of this ordinance shall be recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in accordance with §15.2-2272.2 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended). On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment 3 STREET TO BE VACATED PREVIOUSLY VACATED ,~",~~' .a...t~"~.~.' . 1i~sBI~ Av l~"... ,,~ __ r g• ~: R.GBS L. '~ 'G ;~ ,r A7' ln.. «.a a. i ,e ~Pa~hington Rd To Be Vacated ~ " ~'~; . ~, L ~ 9~~ ,~~ ,,~~` r~~~~ :J ~ wee t;a ,. ~ tldtng Supply ' ,~£A~~h'v. ~:,; ~, v:~y~. .. ~ "~,jY~i6. ~. ~ ~ d v 9 . >, ~• `~ ~` 1 lY ~lL l H.. s ~~ s„ +~ ~~' . J? s ,s~~'. n ti ~ ~ ~,'~jy~~i~ 27T Aa. y~.~ 7 ~ .n..,4'Oi °~ ~t.i, ~W~Ir.7 ~ tAl A6 a, . //l~ ~+-~ ,, aNn ~ ~'~V6' aa. der ' . ,~ Common Areva ~ assessed proporttanately L'~~ .. with eacfi unlt 1 irk /~.'~ "I :~~ 1 r ,~ ' ~ ~~~~ Quail Vafley Cdndomintume 8 ~~ 1'.100' ~7 ,rn, ~---~t._p ~ 4. 2+ 3 r-s~n rsna.,sme / ~. may. 6wxp +,1_tl.A__r_ea~•3111~7o ex q , ~ e` L ~} ~ ~ ` . /^., ~ ~ J ~ Ls. Y,g 7 ~~~ ,6y +v r . s 8. ~a.x ,e. s~ f ~ a 18. ~ aru ~ ~ aaD ~ 'e+.v~ ~ a' ~ ~' .,~ ~: z 8. RDANDKE COUNTY ~YAS$INGTON ROAD DEPARTMENT DF TD B~' t~ACAT~'I1 CD~A~'UNPTY DL"Y~'LDPM.E'NT T~ ~'~D Nv. 8 s. Dt4-1-~ - 02-24-39 ,~ ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER `~ "' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 23, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: REQUEST TO VACATE AS PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY WASHINGTON ROAD RECORDED IN PLAT 1, PAGE 363, PINKARD COURT SUBDIVISION IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT, ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The petitioner, Lowe's Corporation, is requesting that the Board of Supervisors vacate as public right-of--way Washington Road. County staff is recommending that the Board of Supervisors approve the attached ordinance. BACKGROUND: In order for Lowe's Corporation to move forward with their development plans for the Pinkard Court Subdivision, County staff proceeded upon the petition of the residents of the Pinkard Court Subdivision to abandon and vacate the public streets and rights-of-way in the subdivision. On November 18, 1997, staff submitted a report to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors requesting authorization to give notice to the Commonwealth Transportation Board to proceed with the abandonment of the public streets in the Pinkard Court Subdivision. On February 6, 1998, Roanoke County was notified by the Commonwealth Transportation Board that the requested streets in the Pinkard Court Subdivision were abandoned. On February 10, 1998, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors vacated all of the public right-of-ways and alleys except Washington Road, portion of View Avenue and drainage easement in the Pinkard Court Subdivision. _. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: At the time, staff was moving forward with the vacation of Pinkard Avenue, Meadow View Road, Booker Road and Summit Avenue the several properties adjacent to Washington Avenue were under different ownership. Roanoke County was required to maintain access to the properties. Since then, Lowe's Corporation has purchased all properties fronting on Washington Road thus eliminating any need of the public right-of-way. Once the rights-of-way is vacated, the property will be divided and combined with the properties adjacent pursuant to the requirements of Title 15.2, Chapter 22, Code of Virginia, 1950 (as amended) as cited in Section 15.2-2274. Roanoke County staff has received no objections to this petition and requests that the described right-of-way shown on the attached map (Exhibit "A") be vacated in accordance with Chapter 22, Title 15.2-2272(2), Code of Virginia 1950, as amended. A first reading of the proposed ordinance was held on March 9, 1999; a Public Hearing and second reading is scheduled for March 23, 1999. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: County staff is requesting that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors approve the second reading of ordinance to vacate and close as public right-of-way Washington Road. SUBMITTED BY: Arnold Covey, Director Department of Community Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) APPROVED BY: '~",~i Elmer C. Hodge lopment County Administrator ACTION Motion by: VOTE No Yes Abs Harrison Johnson McNamara Minnix Nickens EYHIBIT "A" STREET TO HE VACATED [~~~~\~~~ PREVIO~iSLY VACATED -., 3.~E An Washington Rd To Be Vacated ~o.x ,n i n. as ':" ~ asp 1 Y ~ 3 ~1 . ~ i ,4~~. Common Areas ~ ~ - ~, ~,1 assessed proportionately ` - '- with each unit ~:.:_.. ~ .._: _..m. 7 ~"~~:, i~„.n 5 S , ~' ~~ a ~, - ,1 ~~; ~ ~~ ~ , ~ ~~:, ', ,x~ ~~. ~ ~ . ' ' : . , V, . . ~ ~/`' V ~7i ~;r~ ~, Y ;; :, y.W ~' ,~. ~ 7:r4 ' ~ z.ri ,e. ~ ',~, 1 ~~ ~,. Quail Valley Condominiums - -~-~ yr" i ,, ,, /0 88:05 lr- ~ ., - 3~~, t •_, oo ~ ~, `- ~Ja iM.q~ - ~ j j~7 4~ ~ x>. ~ ,. ~ ~i ~` , J __. ? _. ~ 0 t 1 $ W ~ 40.34 ~ ~' .~,. _ ~ vo i t S'. .tau„ ~" P ~ j N ROANOKE COUNTY WASfIINGTON ROAD DEPARTMEtVT OF TD BE VACATED COMMUNITY DEY~'LOPAT"~'NT T ~Ic~D No. 87.Oa-: -~ 02-24-9J i' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF RO.~NOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINIS7 EZATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 1999 ORDINANCE VACATING AND CLOSING AS PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY WASHINGTON ROAD IN PINKARD COURT SUBDIVISION SHOWN IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 363 ~:_.~ ^~..., ,.:e .. WHEREAS, the Petitioner, Lowe's Home Centers, Inc., is the owner of the lots in Pinkard Court Subdivision and the properties fronting on the southwest side of Washington Road in said subdivision; and, WHEREAS, the Petitioner is in the process of developing the properties for a retail business in the County of Roanoke; and, WHEREAS, the Petitioner has requested that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, vacate and close Washington Road as public right-of--way, said street having been created and shown on the "Map of Pinkard Court" recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 363; and, WHEREAS, a portion of Valley Avenue, all of Pinkard Avenue, Meadow View Road, Booker Road, and Summit Avenue, and all alleys in Pinkard Court Subdivision have been previously vacated pursuant to Ordinance # 021098-9; and, WHEREAS, Washington Road is no longer required as a public right-of--way; and, WHEREAS, §15.2-2272.2 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended) requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by § 15.2 March 9, 1999; the public hearing and second reading of this ordinance was held on March 23, 1999. f y~~ "" NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the public right-of--way, situate in the Cave Spring Magisterial District of Roanoke County, shown and cross-hatched on Exhibit A attached hereto, and referenced as Washington Road, created on plat entitled "Map of Pinkard Court", recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 1, Page 363, be, and hereby is, vacated and closed pursuant to Section 15.2-2272 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), subject to the following conditions: a. That fee simple title to said road shall vest in the owner(s) of the abutting properties within the subdivision as provided in § 15.2-2274 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), subject to the condition that the vacated areas of land shall be added and combined, by deed or by plat, to said abutting property, in compliance with the Roanoke County Subdivision and Zoning Ordinances, and other applicable laws and regulations. b. That all costs and expenses associated herewith, including but not limited to publication, survey and recordation costs, shall be the responsibility of the Petitioner, Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.; and, 2. That the County Administrator, any Assistant County Administrator, or any County Subdivision Agent, is hereby authorized to execute such other documents and take such further actions on behalf of Roanoke County as may be necessary to accomplish the provisions of this ordinance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 2 ~.. 3. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption, and a certified copy of this ordinance shall be recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in accordance with § 15.2-2272.2 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended). G:\ATTORNEY\VLH\AGENDA\ROADS\WASHNGTN.ORD 3 '' ~ ,~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 1999 ORDINANCE 032399-16 TO VACATE A PORTION OF A 15-FOOT DRAINAGE EASEMENT ON PLAT SHOWING SECTION NO. 1, EDGEMONT OF VINTON, PLAT BOOK 16, PAGE 41, AND FURTHER SHOWN ON LOT 5, BLOCK 3, SECTION 2, EDGEMONT OF VINTON, PLAT BOOK 18, PAGE 130, AND REVISED PLAT OF SECTION NO. 2, EDGEMONT OF VINTON, PLAT BOOK 18, PAGE 171, IN THE VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (TAX MAP NO. 61.02-7-1) WHEREAS, by subdivision plat entitled `PLAT SHOWING SECTION NO. 1 "EDGEMONT OF VINTON,", dated September 10, 1993, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Plat Book 16, page 41, a fifteen-foot (15') drainage easement was shown and created on remaining portion of Tax #61.02-1-52, Property of C. & S. Development Corp., the subject easement being designated on said plat as "NEW 15' D.E."; and, WHEREAS, by said subdivision plat entitled `PLAT OF SUBDIVISION FOR C. & S. DEV. CORP. CREATING HEREON SECTION NO. 2, "EDGEMONT OF VINTON"', dated February 24, 1995, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 18, page 130, the existing fifteen-foot (15') drainage easement was shown on Lot 5, Block 3, Section 2, the subject easement being designated on said plat as "EXIST. 15' D.E."; and WHEREAS, the subject easement is further shown on Lot 5, Block 3, Section 2 of `PLAT OF SUBDIVISION FOR C. & S. DEV. CORP. CREATING HEREON REVISED SECTION N0. 2 "EDGEMONT OF VINTON"', dated February 24, 1995, revised May 20, 1996, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 18, page 171, and designated on said plat as "EXIST. 15' D. E."; and, WHEREAS, the Petitioner, Charles R. Simpson, has requested that the above- described existing 15' drainage easement, be vacated, and the current owners of Lot 5, Block 3, Section 2, Edgemont of Vinton, Charles E. Jones, Jr. and Deborah C. Jones, concur with the request; and, WHEREAS, the construction of a proposed dwelling on Lot 5 will result in an encroachment on the subject drainage easement and the Petitioner has requested that it be vacated pursuant to § 15.2-2272.2 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended); and, WHEREAS, this vacation will not involve any cost to the County and the affected County departments have raised no objection; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by § 15.2-2204 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), and the first reading of this ordinance was held on March 9, 1999, and the public hearing and second reading of this ordinance was held on March 23, 1999. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the drainage easement being designated and shown as "Easement to be Vacated" on Exhibit A attached hereto, said easement having been dedicated on `PLAT SHOWING SECTION N0. 1 "EDGEMONT OF VINTON"', dated September 10, 1993, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 16, page 41, and further shown on `PLAT OF SUBDIVISION FOR C. & S. DEV. CORP. CREATING HEREON SECTION NO. 2, "EDGEMONT OF VINTON"', dated February 24, 1995, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 18, page 130, and further shown on `PLAT OF SUBDIVISION FOR C. & S. DEV. CORP. CREATING HEREON REVISED SECTION NO. 2 "EDGEMONT OF VINTON"', dated February 24, 1995, revised May 20, 1996, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 18, page 171, in the Vinton Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to § 15.2-2272 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), subject to the conditions contained herein. 2 2. That all costs and expenses associated herewith, including but not limited to publication, survey and recordation costs, shall be the responsibility of the Petitioner. 3. That the County Administrator, or an Assistant County Administrator, is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish the provisions of this ordinance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 4. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption, and a certified copy of this ordinance shall be recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in accordance with §15.2-2272.2 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended). On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~• Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment 3 _1 4 +Gl Frc ' U Go. Dona N Phone M ~~ y'11 [';O ~. F4xN _ '`~ 7.5' _ 1NE 1-2 AIN ASE BEARING 44'08' DISTANCE 34.81 2-3 7 't78' 4.8 Ct~1. 3-4 '13' 4.31 4-5 50' 3206 ' S-1 N '54'E 7.77 CURVE DATA FOR 2-3: RADIUS "• 22.50' L1~IGTH ~ 4_85' DELTA 11^51'11' ~- T 1 s~ti Ex~ \.S ~ 0 EXt~ ~5\P~ ~ ~ti ~~ u ~ ~ ,~~ BL'DCK 3, SECT1QtV N.o. 1 'EDGEMONT OF VINTDN' M ~~ BUJ ~-~ OF ~-~Q ~- s ~. ,~ "- ~ ~- ~ v ca q . L07' .i, r m ~mr~ ~ ~ ~ PROPOSED 7.6 DRAINAGE EASElriENT ~„ 6Y SEPARATE DEED PROPOSED 15' DRAINAGE EASEMENT ~` BY SEPARATE DEED l PARCEL A-7 GREYSTaKE PARTNE32SHIP StJ8DIV1SiON (,_ (D.B. 1450, Pis. 7138) :' PROPERTY OF ~ CHARLES E: JONES. JR. do DEBORAH C. JONES ~ D.9. 1803, PG. 1791 ~~ ~~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .` NEW 7.5' ~~,. DRAINAGE EASEMENT ~-OT g ~r ~ \ 5 ,~ ~\ BLCACIC 3, SECTION No. 2 "EDGELIONT OF VINTON` (P.B. 18, PG: 171) OTE; • I) THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEt1T OF A CURRENT TITLE REPORT AND THERE MAY EXIST ENCUMBRANCES WI.1tCH AFFECT THE PROPERTY NOT SHOWN HE REON. PLAT SHOVYING ds~ot- NEW 7.5' DRAINAGE EASEMENT EAS~~~I~'t-' -i'p o ~/SCo/Q~ •'~ -~ ~NCENT K ~ LOCATED ON ~~ V~{C t~Ta~ , LOT 5, BLOCK 3 SECTION ~~°~ , 2 EDGEMONT ~(P. $; 18 PG. 171) No_ 14288 BEING DEDICATED pl' ~ CHARLES E. JONES, JR. & ~vri`~' DE$iDRAH c. JONES ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS VIN TON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA SCALE: 1" ~ 50' DATE: 21S JANUARY 1999 LUMSDEN ASSQCI S P C , , . ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS CANNERS ROANOKE, VIRGI A ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 23, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE TO VACATE A PORTION OF A 15-FOOT DRAINAGE EASEMENT ON PLAT SHOWING SECTION NO. 1, EDGEMONT OF VINTON, PLAT BOOK 16, PG 41, AND FURTHER SHOWN ON LOT 5, BLOCK 3, SECTION 2, EDGEMONT OF VINTON, PLAT BOOK 18, PAGE 130, AND REVISED PLAT OF SECTION NO. 2, EDGEMONT OF VINTON, PLAT BOOK 18, PAGE 171, IN THE VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (TAX MAP NO. 61.02-7-1) COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The developer, Charles R. Simpson has requested Roanoke County to vacate a portion (Exhibit A) of a donated drainage easement, Lot 5, Block 3, Section 2, dedicated with a subdivision plat, Edgemont of Vinton, Section 2, P.B. 18, PG 171. This vacation will allow the developer to construct a similar home on Lot 5 that is consistent with the neighborhood. The developer has acquired the necessary easements to convey the drainage from the right-of-way to a natural watercourse so the Virginia Department of Transportation will accept the streets. A first reading of the proposed ordinance was held on March 9, 1999; a Public Hearing and second reading is scheduled for March 23, 1999. 1 S-1 v STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Department of Community Development staff recommends the vacation of a portion of the existing drainage easement as shown on the attached plat. SUBMITTED BY: A~rr6(d Covey~irector Department of Community evelopment ACTION Approved ()Motion by: _ Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Harrison Johnson McNamara Minnix Nickens pc: Vickie L. Huffman, Assistant County Attorney Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator VOTE No Yes Abs 2 Post-tt` Fax Note 7675 oar®l *~9~- 1 To ~' Fro Co Co. u r` PAOn~ N Phone N ~^ an N ['~ Q ~` Fax M 1 7. AIN A SE UNE BEARING DISTANCE 1-2 44' 34.91 2-3 '0 ' 4.6 CI•i. 3-4 7 4.31 ~5 g ' ]2.06 5-1 N '54'E 7.77 CURVE DATA FOR 2-3: RADIUS ~++ 22.50' LENGTH ~ 4.85' DELTA 11'51'11' ~_ EX~ Ig Ex Sr 1~ '~ ~. `~~ `V o /~ ~ \5\ P\ ~~?`' . 3O'~~ u E~ BLOCK 3, SECTION No. 1 'EOGEMONT OF VINTON' MB `\ ,vj~~'\+ / ~I ~/ v ~~ 4 °- LOT 4 eg;' `~ tai m ~ 2 ~. ~ PROPOSED 7.5' DRAINAGE EASEIiAENT ai BY SEPARATE DEED { PROPOSED 15' RRAINAGE EASEMENT BY SEPARATE DEED PARCEL A-7 / GREYSTOKE PARTNERSHIP SUBDIVISION L (D.B. 1450, PG. 1138) ~Q ~ • ..p1 dF ~~ . e 9 QG ~{~ ~~~\~N CEO . ~p~ PROPERTY OF ~ CI-IARLI=S E. JONES. JR. do DEBORAH C. JONES w D.B_ 1803, PG. 1791 ~\ \ \~ \,~ \ ~ NEW 7.5" ~~~ DRAINAGE EASEMENT ~O7 6 ~ ~~ / ~ m ~a =~ 5 rJ ~ `~ BLGCK 3, SECTION No. 2 "EDGEI~/ONT Of VINTCN` J (P.B. 18, PG. 171} NOTE: ____ 1) THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED YVITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A CURRENT TITLE REPORT AND THERE MAY EXIST ENCUMBRANCES Wi-itCH AFFECT THE PROPERTY NOT SHOWN HEREON. PLAT SHOWING ~„~,~~ o~. , NEW 7.5' DRAINAGE EASEMENT ~A,S~'blE~' ~I"O ?•~ i~~,~~f,1' '~A`, LOCATED ON VINCENT K ~, LOT 5, BLOCK 3, SECTION 2 ~~.L~°~ EDGEMONT (P. B. 18 PG. 171) No_ 1428® BEING DEDICATED BY CHARLES E. JONES, JR. & sv~r~'~ DEBORAH C. JONES TO ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS VIN TON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA SCALE: 1 ° a 50' DATE: 26 JANUARY 1959 LUMSDEN AS54CI S, P. C. ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS CANNERS ROANOKE, VIRGI A ,~ ) o AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 1999 ORDINANCE TO VACATE A PORTION OF A 15-FOOT DRAINAGE EASEMENT ON PLAT SHOWING SECTION NO. 1, EDGEMONT OF VINTON, PLAT BOOK 16, PAGE 41, AND FURTHER SHOWN ON LOT 5, BLOCK 3, SECTION 2, EDGEMONT OF VINTON, PLAT BOOK 18, PAGE 130, AND REVISED PLAT OF SECTION NO.2, EDGEMONT OF VINTON, PLAT BOOK 18, PAGE 171, IN THE VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (TAX MAP NO. 61.02-7-1) WHEREAS, by subdivision plat entitled `PLAT SHOWING SECTION NO. 1 "EDGEMONT OF VINTON,", dated September 10, 1993, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Plat Book 16, page 41, a fifteen-foot (15') drainage easement was shown and created on remaining portion of Tax #61.02-1-52, Property of C. & S. Development Corp., the subject easement being designated on said plat as "NEW 15' D.E."; and, WHEREAS, by said subdivision plat entitled `PLAT OF SUBDIVISION FOR C. & S. DEV. CORP. CREATING HEREON SECTION NO. 2, "EDGEMONT OF VINTON"', dated February 24, 1995, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 18, page 130, the existing fifteen- foot (15') drainage easement was shown on Lot 5, Block 3, Section 2, the subject easement being designated on said plat as "EXIST. 15' D.E."; and WHEREAS, the subject easement is further shown on Lot 5, Block 3, Section 2 of `PLAT OF SUBDIVISION FOR C. & S. DEV. CORP. CREATING HEREON REVISED SECTION NO. 2 "EDGEMONT OF VINTON"', dated February 24, 1995, revised May 20, 1996, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 18, page 171, and designated on said plat as "EXIST. 15' D.E."; and, S_-o WHEREAS, the Petitioner, Charles R. Simpson, has requested that the ai ~ove-described existing 15' drainage easement, be vacated, and the current owners of Lot 5, Block 3, Section 2, Edgemont of Vinton, Charles E. Jones, Jr. and Deborah C. Jones, concur with the request; and, WHEREAS, the construction of a proposed dwelling on Lot 5 will result in an encroachment on the subject drainage easement and the Petitioner has requested that it be vacated pursuant to § 15.2-2272.2 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended); and, WHEREAS, this vacation will not involve any cost to the County and the affected County departments have raised no objection; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by § 15.2-2204 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), and the first reading of this ordinance was held on March 9, 1999, and the public hearing and second reading of this ordinance was held on March 23, 1999. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Boazd of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the drainage easement being designated and shown as "Easement to be Vacated" on Exhibit A attached hereto, said easement having been dedicated on `PLAT SHOWING SECTION NO. 1 "EDGEMONT OF VINTON"', dated September 10, 1993, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 16, page 41, and further shown on `PLAT OF SUBDIVISION FOR C. & S. DEV. CORP. CREATING HEREON SECTION N0.2, "EDGEMONT OF VINTON"', dated February 24, 1995, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 18, page 130, and further shown on `PLAT OF SUBDIVISION FOR C. & S. DEV. CORP. CREATING HEREON REVISED SECTION NO.2 "EDGEMONT OF VINTON"', dated February 24, 1995, revised May 20, 1996, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 18, page 171, in the Vinton 2 Magisterial District of the Co of the unty °fRoanoke, be, and hereb ~'' Code ° f Virgi~a (1950 Y rs, vacated as amended Pursuant to § 15 2.2272 2 ), subject to the conditions contain ub ' That all costs and expenses ass ed herein. P Ircatron ocrated herewith survey and recordation c , includin osts, shall be the res g but not lirruted to 3• That the Ponsibility of the P County Ad~~strator etitioner. authorized to ex , or an Assistant ecute such documents and t County Admi aloe such actions as ma mstrator, is hereby provisions of this ordinance, a1] of whi Y be necessary to accomplish the ch shall be on form approved b 4. That this ordinance shall be Y the County Attorney. certified co effective on and from the PY of this ordinance shall be r date of its ado Count ~Orded in the Clerk's Office of the Ption, and a Y, Virgi~a, in accordance with Circuit Court ofltOanoke § 15.2_2272 2 of the Code of Vir i g rna (1950, as amended). G: ~TTOrtNE YI VI,FIIAGEND,~IEDGEMONT. ORD 3 1~ ~ EtOANp,1.~ G /~. ~ Z f7 ~ 2 ,ate 1 38 t y C~~~t~t~ a~ ~.v~xrt~~e P.O. BOX 29t300 5204 BERNARD DRIVE MARY H. ALLEN, CMC ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 2401 8-0798 BRENDA J. HOLTON CLERK TO THE BOARD (540) 772-2005 DEPUTY CLERK Internet E-Mail: mallen@www.co.roanoke.va.us FAX (540) 772-2193 Internet E-Mail: bholton@www.co.roanoke.va.us March 24, 1999 The Honorable James S. Gilmore, III Governor of Virginia 3rd Floor, State Capitol Richmond, VA 23219 Dear Governor Gilmore: Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 032399-1 requesting the deletion of meals tax restrictions from the Food Tax Relief Bill (HB 1601). This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, March 23, 1999. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ~• Mary H. Allen, CMC, AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bjh Attachment cc: W. Brent Robertson, Budget Manager Paul M .Mahoney, County Attorney The Honorable R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue The Honorable C. Richard Cranwell The Honorable Clifton A. Woodrum The Honorable A. Victor Thomas The Honorable H. Morgan Griffith The Honorable John S. Edwards The Hon. Malfourd W. "Bo" Trumbo ® Recycled Paper 1V From: "Brent Robertson" <ADM01/WBR> To: "Brenda Holton" <ADM01/BJH> Date sent: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 14:55:15 +0000 Subject: Re: Reso Food Tax Relief Bill I would prefer this come from the Board of Supervisors office. Let me know if you need anything or any help. Thanks! > From: "Brenda Holton" <ADM01/BJH> > To: adm01/wbr > Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 12:36:52 +0000 > Subject: Reso Food Tax Relief Bill > Brent, I have listed copies to you, PMM, Governor, and Roanoke > Valley Legislative Delegation for this resolution. Do you want to > send with letter or should I send with standard letter? Do you want > me to fax to Governor? Whatever -just let me know how you want to > handle. > / > Thanks, N > Brenda Holton CMC ~ ~'~ > Deputy Clerk ~ ~, ~~~ > 772-2005 ~~~ ~ ~~ i > ~~ 3\i Brenda Holton -- 1 -- Wed, 24 Mar 1999 14:58:04 ~ POANp,I.~ ti. A r z ~ t ~ az C~~~xx~~ ~~ ~~xxY~.~.~ 1 38 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE MARY H. ALLEN, CMC ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 BRENDA J. HOLTON CLERK TO THE BOARD (540) 772-2005 DEPUTY CLERK Internet E-Mail: mallen@www.co.roanoke.va.us FAX (540) 772-2193 Internet E-Mail: bholton@www.co.roanoke.va.us March 24, 1999 Mr. Ron Angelone, Director Virginia Department of Corrections 6900 Atmore Drive Richmond, VA 23225 Dear Mr. Angelone: Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 032399-5.j requesting the use of inmate labor from the Department of Corrections to clear the fire break area behind Catawba Hospital. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, March 23, 1999. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, CMC, AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bjh Attachment cc: J. D. Terry, Superintendent, Botetourt Correctional Unit, P Troutville, VA 24175-0250 Jack Wood, Assistant Administrator, Catawba Hospital, P. Catawba, VA 24070 Sheriff Gerald Holt, Roanoke County Ray Lavinder, Chief of Police, Roanoke County O. Box 250, O. Box 200 ® Recycled Paper i~~~, ,,•, G . ' -~~ 4 ~ j // _ ~ y~ ®~~®~~~f~~~~ O~ ~~~~~NjA J. D. TERRY Department of Corrections SUPERINTENDENT Division of Adult Institutional Services Western Region I Botetourt Correctional Unit March 4, 1999 Mr. Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator PO Box 29800 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 Dear Mr. Hodge: P. O. BOX 250 1414 STONEY BATTERY RD. TROUTVILLE, VA 24175-0250 PHONE: (540 857-7021 FAX: (540) 992-1284 I am in receipt of your letter dated February 18, 1999, requesting the use of inmates to clear the fire break area behind Catawba Hospital in Roanoke County. In order for this unit to consider your request, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors must adopt a resolution requesting the Department of Corrections to allow Roanoke County to use inmate labor from Botetourt Correctional Unit on various government projects. Botetourt County Board of Supervisors may be able to offer guidance with information on their resolution. The Resolution Number is 92-OS-08, dated May 18, 1992. If I can be of any further service in this manner, please do not hesitate to contact me. J. D Correctional Unit JDT/tsb ~ EiOAN ,t.~ a ~. ~ z c~ ~ i a~ 1 38 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (540) 772-2004 C~~ix~#~ ~~ ~n~x~~~E P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (540) 772-2193 March 24,1999 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BOB L. JOHNSON, CHAIRMAN HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS, VICE-CHAIRMAN VINTON MAGISTERIAL. DISTRICT FENTON F. "SPIKE" HARRISON, JR. CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT JOSEPH MCNAMARA WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (540) 772-2005 Rev. William T. Ross Vinton Baptist Church Washington Avenue and Maple Street Vinton, VA 24179 Dear Reverend On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, I would like to thank you for offering the invocation at our meeting on Tuesday, March 23, 1999. We believe it is most important to ask for divine guidance at these meetings and the Board is very grateful for your contribution. Thank you again for sharing your time and your words with us. It was good to have you with us. With kindest regards, ~- Bob L. Johnson, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Intemet E-Mail Internet E-Mail ehodge@www.co.roanoke.va.us ®Recycled Paper bos@www.co.roanoke.va.us ~ R ANp~,~ _ ';c~ a? ~~~~~ ~~ ~~~~.~Z~ 1838 P.O. BOX 29800 MARY H. ALLEN, CMC CLERK TO THE BOARD Internet E-Mail: mallen@www.co.roanoke.va.us 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (540) 772-2005 FAX (540) 772-2193 BRENDA J. HOLTON DEPUTY CLERK Internet E-Mail: bholton@www.co.roanoke.va.us March 24, 1999 Mr. Cecil Prillaman 7693 Bent Mountain Road Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Mr. Prillaman: I am pleased to inform you that, at their meeting held on Tuesday, March 23, 1999, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to appoint you as a member of the Roanoke County Commission for Senior and Challenged Citizens to represent the Cave Spring Magisterial District. This Commission was established to address the needs of this group of citizens and make recommendations to the Board. Ms. Debbie Pitts, Roanoke County's Assistant Director of Recreation, will be in touch with you concerning the date and time when the Commission will have its next meeting. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, or appointed to any public body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act. Your copy is enclosed. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures cc: Debbie Pitts, Assistant Director of Recreation John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator ® Recycled Paper ~ pOAN ,I.~ ~ , A z c~ a l~ ~7 ~~~1.Y rY ~ ~1 K rY rY1~Y Y1r ~ A P.O. BOX 29800 MARY H. ALLEN, CMC CLERK TO THE BOARD Internet E-Mail: mallen@www.co.roanoke.va.us 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (540) 772-2005 FAX (540) 772-2193 BRENDA J. HOLTON DEPUTY CLERK Internet E-Mail: bholton@www.co.roanoke.va.us March 24, 1999 Ms. Maureen Woods 2615 Dovetail Circle Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Ms. Woods: I am pleased to inform you that, at their meeting held on Tuesday, March 23, 1999, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to appoint you as a member of the Roanoke County Commission for Senior and Challenged Citizens to represent the Cave spring Magisterial District. This Commission was established to address the needs of this group of citizens and make recommendations to the Board. Ms. Debbie Pitts, Roanoke County's Assistant Director of Recreation, will be in touch with you concerning the date and time when the Commission will have its next meeting. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, or appointed to any public body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act. Your copy is enclosed. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Sincerely, ~• Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures cc: Debbie Pitts, Assistant Director of Recreation John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator ® RecyGed Paper From: "Pete Haislip" <GUP01/TSH> To: "Brenda Holton" <ADM01/BJH> Date sent: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 13:33:41 +0000 Subject: Re: Reso Va Trails B. Please send to us. Thanks. Pete From: "Brenda Holton" <ADM01/BJH> To: gup01/tsh Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 12:35:02 +0000 Subject: Reso Va Trails Pete, do you want me to send you a copy of resolution to you with a certified copy for Va Dept of Conser and Recreation? Will you submit the resolution to them or do you want us to send to them with standard letter? Just let me know how you want handled. Thanks, Brenda Holton CMC Deputy Clerk 772-2005 Brenda Holton -- 1 -- Wed, 24 Mar 1999 14:57:46 I N T E R MEMO O F F I C E To: Members, Board of Supervisors From: Elmer Hodge, County Administrator Subject: FY 1999-2000 Budget Date: March 19, 1999 Over the next several months the Board of Supervisors, School Board, and County and School Staff will finalize operating and capital budgets for FY99-00. This memo is a review of my notes concerning the significant County and School issues that have been or need to be considered before the budget is finalized. I reviewed this information with Mr. Johnson and Mr. McNamara and wanted all of the Board members to have this information. Projected Sources/Uses of New Revenues (Attachment I) School Funding Education has long been a top priority for the Board and the community. State and Federal funding, local appropriations, and capital construction are the significant variables that have been considered for FY99-00. School Capital Over the last several years, the Board has set aside $2,000,000 each year for School construction needs. This unappropriated capital balance currently totals $6,104,815. Of the $2,000,000 included in the preliminary FY2000 budget, $1,222,702 will be allocated to debt service for school projects recently or soon to be completed. This leaves $777,298 unallocated for additional "non-recurring" School or County needs. If the remainder is allocated to the capital construction reserve, this account will total $6,882,113. (Attachmentll) Completion of several school projects from the 1992 bond issue within budget allocations has resulted in an unallocated capital balance of approximately $1.2 million that can be used to off-set other capital construction costs. School Operating Additional State funding for Basic Aid of $799,181 and the allocation of lottery proceeds of $1,669,793 increases state funding by a total of $2,468,974. County and School staff developed a preliminary figure for increasing the School operating transfer from the County in the amount of $1,300,415. Increased state and local revenues of $3,769,389 represents a 4.3% increase in the operating budget for FY2000. Members, Board of Supervisors Page 2 March 19, 1999 During FY1999 (current year), the Schools will receive an additional $1.5 million in lottery proceeds resulting from General Assembly action. Economic Development During the planning retreat held in January, the Board of Supervisors identified economic development issues that needed consideration in development of next year's budget. Preliminary budget development includes $1,057,650 for the final payment on the Center for Research and Technology property and $100,000 for continued site development. In addition, water and sewer is planned for the site in FY2000 and is included in the Utility Department's CII'. After the close-out of Dixie Caverns landfill, approximately $1.5 million remains in the unappropriated capital account. We should earmark $500,000 to cover incentives for Advance Auto Parts expansion plans in Roanoke County. The remainder of these funds could be used for the development of CRT or other economic development prospects. Public/private partnership funding of $250,000 has again been proposed for FY2000 to provide incentives for future economic development prospects. Compensation Increases • Based on state funding for salaries, teachers must receive at least a 3.54% raise in order for the County to receive 100% of the state allocation totaling $1.4 million. If teacher raises are less than 3.54%, then $800,000 of the $1.4 million state allocation is forfeited. The additiona10.54% for the Schools equals $394,956 (Attachment III). • In recent years, we have kept School and County pay increases the same. An additional 0.54% would amount to $171,720 for all County employees (Attachment III). • Compensation Board and other state employees will~receive between a 6.25% and 13.68% salary increase, depending on the specific constitutional office and position. Effective increases (7 months) for state employees are greater than 3.54%. All state increases have an effective date of 12/1/99. • Health Insurance Premium rates for both Comprehensive and Point of Service Plans increased by 10% for next year. Employees and the County will share the increase equally. An employee under the Comprehensive Plan with family coverage will pay an additional $24.48 per month while the Point of Service participant with family coverage will pay an additional $16.98 per month. In response to one Board member's request, we can save $63,630 (109 participants) on the County side and $89,474 (162 participants) on the School side by equalizing the premiums paid for all employees. At present, the County Members, Board of Supervisors Page 3 March 19, 1999 pays a higher premium rate for Comprehensive Plan participants. Other Expenditure Considerations Departmental budget meetings have just been completed and their requests for additional funding are being evaluated. The majority of the requests revolve around staffing and equipment concerns and, for the most part, do not relate to new services. If additional staffing in key areas is needed, it would be good to increase gradually, while maintaining acceptable levels of service. Long-range planning efforts will include the review of reallocations of existing staffto the areas where the need is the greatest. We are still evaluating these requests, but it is unlikely that I will ask for any of these positions in the final budget. • Fire and Rescue is requesting 6 additional Paramedic/Firefighter positions • Police Department is requesting 12 new Uniform officer positions to establish 2 additional patrol districts and 1 new Detective position. In addition, they are requesting replacement of 25 patrol and detective vehicles. • The Sheriff is requesting 6 additional Court Bailiffs and 7 additional Corrections Officers. • Circuit Court judges are requesting aCounty-funded Law Clerk. • Vehicle replacement issues continue to be a concern of Community Development, Real Estate Assessments, Parks & Recreation, the County Garage, and Solid Waste. • Contributions The Regional Economic Development Partnership has asked for increased per capita funding of approximately $25,000. To maintain equity, I would recommend the same level of funding for the Convention and Visitor's Bureau. Beyond FYZ000 Looking down the road to next year, we can be cautiously optimistic. The $1,057,650 final CRT payment is allocated out of general operating funds and those funds will be available for other needs. We are also hoping that an actuarial study of the VRS rate structure will reduce the anticipated increases over the next several years. In addition, the national, state, and local economies continue to perform well and are projected to continue growing, at least over the next several years. Attachment I Projected Sources/Uses of New Revenues - FY1999-2000 Roanoke County/Roanoke County Schools As of March 18,1999 Resources /Reserves Available: County Sources Allocation -School Construction Revenue Growth: Real Estate Personal Property Sales Tax Other Taxes & Fees State Revenues: 599 Law Enforcement Other State Revenues Compensation Board Schools Sources Basic Aid Lottery Proceeds Eaaenditure Considerations: 3.54% Salary Increase VRS Rate Increase Health Insurance Increase CPMT Gainsharing Debt Service: Glen Mary School Construction Shared additonal funds Covered expenditures School revenue sources State Basic Aid Lottery Proceeds Local appropriation Local appropriation -debt Schools 2,589,156 600,000 400,000 75,000 1,222,702 4,886,858 Total 1,222,702 2,055,000 (130,000) 325,000 730,627 803,000 126,891 313,000 4,223,518 799,181 1,669,793 2,468,974 7,915,194 Countv 1,125,720 3,714,876 318,000 918,000 270,000 670,000 15,500 90,500 31,000 31,000 1,057,650 1,057,650 1,222,702 2,817,870 7,704,728 105,233 105,233 210,466 4,992,091 2,923,103 7,915,194 799,181 1,669,793 1,300,415 1,222,702 4,992,091 m:\budget\proposed\rev-sptt ecF}-resources 3/18/99 Attachment II FUTURE SCHOOL CAPITAL RESERVE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Amount 23, 1998 Savings from 1996-97 debt budget $670,000.00 Transfer from County Capital Projects Fund 1,113,043.00 FY97-98 Original budget appropriation 2,000,000.00 Savings from 1997-98 debt fund 321,772.00 FY98-99 Original budget appropriation 2,000,000.00 Balance at March 23, 1999 $6,104,815.00 Respectfully Submitted, ~~~ ~. ~~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance Approved By, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator M:\Finance\Common\Boazd\School9 8. WK4 Attachment III Roanoke County Salary Adjustments Cost of .54% Raise Raise Raise - :; - Raise ~-" Schools , Teachers $564,000 $1,128,000 $1,692,000 . $304,580 Administrators 60,100 120,200 180,300 ~ ~~~~~3~~454 Classified 107,300 214,600 321,900 :.':57,942 Subtotal Schools 731,400 1,462,800 2,194,200 - - =394.,956 County :, - Board Members 621 1,242 1,863 ~ >:~ 338 Constitutional Officers 4,369 8,738 13,108 ~: '"2,359 County Administration 4,052 8,104 12,156 :~ 2188 Department Heads 10,595 21,190 31,785 _.,~ ~ -~5,72~ Classified 298,363 596,726 895,088 ~,.. . ~~`~' ::'161'118 Subtotal County 318,000. 636,000 954,000 ~:- _ °`~~7Y~-7~p Total School and County $1,049,400 $2,098,800 $3,148,200 ~ `~. ~$568,67t3 Notes: ** School Administrators include principals, directors, Superintendent, Asst. Superintendents, and some Supervisors ** School Classified includes support staff, clerical, bus drivers, and cafeteria workers. *" County Classified includes all non-department head positions listed in the classified portion of the classification plan. ** County Adminisration includes County Administrator, County Attomey, and Asst. County Administrators ** Constitutional Officers include the Sheriff, Clerk of the Circuit Court, Treasurer, Commonwealth's Attorney, and Commissioner of the Revenue *" Cost of .54% on County's "Administration" (including: Board Members, Administration, Constitutional Officers, and Department Heads) is $10,604. *"` Elimination of .54% on School and County "Administration" would result in a combined savings of $43,508. Attachment IV N ~ C 0 Q m i+ C ~~,, 0 i+ ~ = O _ ~ N V F ~ ~ UC d m ~ .. tQ ~ ~ ~ u C t0 !0 ~ a r. ~ O O V } N LL. LL o ~ m M 0 o r~ M 0 ~ cn (h 0 o ~ M 0 0 ~,o cD r~ M M ,a ~ co (h o o r (h o ~ rn ~ ~ ~ rn r o ~ co ~rj 0 o ~ M ~ 0 3° om 0 0 0 0 0 0 3Q o N ~ N ~ N t } ('~ N ((~ N ~ (~ (~ N c cd~ _ O O M C y (D (p (O t0 f0 fD (O fp M M (O fU Q~ N a~ '- r V O C U 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ o ~ oe o N to lf) In l!7 1f7 IA lA IA .- In In _ N N N N N N N N N M i'7 N N « 10 (O f0 (O (O (U fU (O (0 ~ ~ (0 (O O ~ ~ C d ~ ~0 oe a ~ ~ M M ~ O °) °) d a R o 0 0 0 3e N N N N N ~ N C N N N N N d ~ o 0 0 0 0 ~ o o ?le o 0 0 N O N O N 2p N S O p N C O O O (O ~ (O R t0 ~f (O 'V' ~ ~ (O ~ r ~ ~ do W a s a s a s a a a a a s ~" a C O r ^. N O ~ r O ~i ~ a i d U O N y p rn E y ~ W 10 ~ m U ~ :o c L° ~ O c E ~ U N O s •~ •~ yy a w ~ O ~ ~ W 7 a ~ O >` VI C ~ ~ N ~ ~ 10 N ~ Q ~ 10 N Y L~ G1 t N d o' ~ U ~ ~ E z ~ g p ~ u~ U r w U c d w ~ c a~ m Q a L c v ~ U w+ c m c a~ C m a c~ m ~ y m E > a m U ~ ~ ~ ry .~ ~ p N U "' d C ° y~ N d. ~ N C o d N in ~ t~ W W d ~ £ ~ ~ E ~ ~ E O ~ .~ E v a M O ~ L •E EO t ~ ~ L L ~ O ~ 7 ~/ t ~ Q U O E U S E U O ~ CA Q U c7 ~ 1- . ., O U U U U ~ ~ l0 ~ °~t (O G 0 N -pOl y W H 10 _c ~+ ~ ec' U N ... w d ~ •> Qi NI m ~ •~ O 2 10 v U N O) C 'C 7 v v ~1 w N u°i .~ w l0 t rn N r N IC N N U ~.- N O ~ N l0 IOII ° a U ~ N d !A ~ 0 l0 w d - a ~ r > c 3 ~ O N N ~` r L ~ C ~ E N C ~ L l0 O ~ A E a~ ~ c :~ ~ ° E c -~ ~o o w ~ ° U rn °! t ~ o W N OI .C '~ C ~ O -~ w a E ~ c ~ ~ ° C E ~i .--' r d E ° t ~ILI O 0 ai w `w ~ c :H CSU ° C U .W N ° H d N p L O 3e o ~` M h O) d ~ N d c ~ *~•~°~ y ~ 10 ~ _ ~ ti ~ ~ .E c7 ~ aNi M O O } Q LL Z O~ ~ ~ ~ LL Zp ~ W W ~ wO ~ U Q F- ~ ~ ~ rn ~` ~° O ~ N W N ~ Q lf) U ~ Z ~ ~j O ~ W F- ~ W Q O ~- m m ZD _O w ~ ~ ZW W ~ ~ ~ Q O U ~ ~ ao r~ ~ co ao M O (O LA 00 ~ W 0 N t1~ o~ 1~ ~ O Z ~ ~ ll ~ C~7 V' M M O o ~ ~ N V O ~ Q } W ~ LL ~ Z W ~ i i i a O w W W cOU~~~~ co~crn UZ rnaoM~~ li W ~ c0 ~ N t~ W d OX W W ~ ~ ~ N O O (~ ~ ~ O 1f7 M f~ Zw vcDrnN~ ~ Z ~ ~ ~ v v W W m 00 ~ V O Q1 J _W ~1 i ~ o .-- M a0 1~ C~ 00 ch ~2 airnocv O Q CO ~ ~ O M J M M sf N M ~ Q N } 1~ O V V Q W O ' V ~0 ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ aQ ~Q w cn H ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O W W `7 ~ f~ O) o r M ~ N Q~ Q ~' ~ ~ ~ F-- Q N N~ N N ~ ~ N , U ~ ca v_ ~n cD ca LWL Q ~ O M O O 1~ O O ~ ~ O~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 W W W W W ~ ~- ~ f"' W W W W W ~ ~ ~ O D ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m m m m m W ~ U ~ W > tLLi. ~Q ~~ Y to ~ ~ W ~ W w ~ = O J ~ O cn U U F- U F J Q U O J d d O O N Y Y Y Y Y O O C C C w co ~ m m 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 ~ ~ a .- ~ cD co ip cD io ~o r- Attachment V Q~ rn rn N z N LL O U N N ~ N N C C .~ ~ a 0 E x (9 O N T N ~ C ~ N d O ~ N ~ ~ C f0 ~ ti m a ~~ w co N ~ ~ ~ Q) ~ } ~ " E d y > ~ 0 d ~ m c ~ o ~ ~ o O L N U f9 ~p ~ y ~ ~ f0 N L N '- ~ O a, o d ~ fD N E ~ N ~ W d Ma.r-1(:-94 l 1 r ..-3A Cit. f:n A,imin. ~4f1 47'i fir:^: P.n; page II After questiunlr+q Ly Kc•zi. P11nVU, Jls. xew]on sCatCd cha[ inmates fmnr raay+ 75 are only allnrwd to wurlti wi public ]ands. and could nor be used rn help rapalr E]w+d deuve cv prirats propcrty. Xr. Bu~uarr rested that iltmdtC Taber hag been extreerfry hwlpful or+er Clrp yvacs op many County and Cotrn pmjeets. Mr. Thompson stated tl+at Lha araploy- eCS at Comp 35 as Mall as thw rraaah!s hate rrorkad ret'y well with the County on sany ttee«, And noted that a thank yw1 to Crptaln J. D. Terry sheutd be included eithez the rslao]utlun ur lrr the sorer Icttcr that aCCOSrpantes rho Baard'a action.. At ter turthcr dlsa!u.sion, on ntor.lnn by Mr. doors, and rattled unaul- mously, the ecrard adnpr~d the felIowinq reao.tuCivL rr~fqueating the aCparttnrnc of Corrlr•tioaa to allow ties CuurrtV Lu use inmate ]shot trots camp a5 en var~nrre Ia:a1 quvvruuwni vcniecta. RCaoiutien xumber 9Z-t)S-ux rrlrstteJUS. 9otetourt county provides :roarer wart te.aer utility servl4VSr ChC ptiD11C landfill, and rerfrarfnnel pYOyraaoeirxg to C1W clllaeur of Bocerourt county, anrf, tvxRRRa.S, IIOtlCa+rrt County and the staFF and irnoates of CorreetlonaI Caarp Z5 in Truutvl]]v have worked together on tr-~lty communi~y-ori- e+rted pLalects vves• the past seresa] years, includirtyl utility rnn- atr•urtlun a+xl cwstarativn. recreation pro,]eCear, ac the p+rhrfa f~n,f_ Fl]], and, Nl1FR8AS, the C1[itsen3 of aotetourt t'ru+nry have greatly beneCitad from rht Iabor of the Inmarr..t rr„m Camp ?5 and tie ur,~rvlvw vE Lhe caatp 25 staff on prrArtc prn~erctsr and, YIrRRRytS, the Botetcwrt County Guard vl Suwrrrlsurs recognlaes the rontriLutiun cu ih~ Cctir.+ntV'a public services perforated by the staff and inapatras vC C+rw Z5 uvvr the past YCars, and gives graotous .cJl,+vwicrdy+af,nt to the Virginia Departtaenc of cvrrecr.fnn, r~nr tts cuuperation, XGW. TllBfth'FURS, the aatecourt County nntM of 9uperrisors dcwa reaolvC re request that the nrparrrarnt of Cuszertiuns a]]vw the use of bare labor frnrra t?rrrpp 25 to esafat in cluodlrruvFlnv. Iandecap- ing, llrr.Pr control, end other i+gpruretryrtta at: (Il the County'8 p„ntp artd e+etertny statioAa ar+d awraVe treatmept plants fncludinq Trran mete, 8agle hock, C~ Z5, Tlr+ker creek, r]adC Creek, and coy- rtrlr Springs, as well as wr ++Ll]iLV wsaw+snts ]ocatCd on public and prirate property, flJ future County MaCCt sCrvtCe ins[allatlons fn sautl,rrtr pvLeLswrt County, f91 oCCaalottaI grettnds islprrivrsrrnr nn Cowtty b.tlFleldr nut during school hears or trhen the rfwr,r.s rtr+e a4•l+vduled fur play. and. f41 the public landlrrr_ Mr. MahlMalne then fntortltad the Board of ties rwsL rrrcent negotiattrtns regarding the upgradt to thf Raanake ragiuraa] swvane Lreattpent plant. Mr. Mr.Rtwr~ftr.~ troted that he and ttra. Nvwlun had attended a mCCtinq Iasc tweEk re- garding this otatt.+r axd 1L was agreed Chat a nCUrrai third party ~rnnsulr,ltKj Eic•>a! should be ht red jty the 1aaaIlcles (Roanoke. Cenrnty, Batetourt County, Sa]em, anal Vlnconl rv r~virw the trail to which utlrwr lvra] Vuvernrsents Kith regional sewagw t-rwarsr.nt plants candurt F..el]!ty upgrade negotiations. xe noted char r.ne cost ,ff this study will by broken down ante an amount which Corresponds to each locality`s I+arrentayw uE capaclLV is the 9CWagC traarment plan[; #.i,~nn rrn.s being requested at this L1we as aotetourt Counsy'~ dpproxltlrate propnrrfnn nE the conaultaut's study. claaeifiedadvertieing '540-981-3415 ~ Mar. 5, 1999 ~102AAM oo~oo~oo The Roanoke Times Acct: 5405633?04ROAN Name: ROANOKE CO SCHOOL B OA Adid: Ph: 5405633704 Class Rate: Disp Rate: LEGAL NOTCE aoANO~E couNrv 593? COVE RD. , N. W Credit Status: OK BOARD OF 3UPERV190R3 rh° rte'"°~ o°"n<'' Eb'~ °' 3upervixrs MII hob a public nearro~ at 7 Rm. en TUeccav, ROANOKE vA 24019 l Re Re uest AA~n: n 73, 7.200, In tn~ Eo~ro ~~e ~;~ ~ ~ ~~m; y p q ~ n , Paytype BL Rate LE Legals Rep: 35 ~O o~;h~dpDet bnw;n°t Rwrolw Ce un +tj seheci em rd Source PH Class 10 Legals ^ TFN t`°b`'`n'spaollbowr"'" t° construct a hbh xho°I, Start 319/99 Days 2 Rate Iss 2 Stop 3/16199 loraea on the rrvt s10? of Pleaalnt°HIIIADrnive, m h c Farmin.°ten Drl~e, u9naar r,ll~ QQ WordS....... 115 p~ 103.82 AA~,,ichorcl Gi3rict. ~ coon et tots acolratlon ~ 0.0o Lines........ 29 Discount 10.38 ~~olla0lo ror In:paMlon In tna ocportmont °f Pbnnir~q and 0 Op Depth....... 29.00 Commis 0.00 Z°n,n s`04 Bvnerd Dli~e, F~~~~, va. Columns...... 1 Net 93.44 DaSed. A4~roh 3, 1509 F1ar~~H Alkn, CkrM 0.00 Graphic..... 0 St Tax 0.00 `lo~~'t 0.00 St Words. 0 Fed Tax 0.00 Free Day 0 ^ Boxed Ad Total 93.44 Payment 0.00 Copy Line LEGAL NOTICE ROAN App Cr. 0.00 Sort String Balance 0.00 On Hold Product Code Tear Sheets ^ Ad Killed PO # Comments Reason for Discount E-mail discount, Editions DC, p1/1 109345 classified advertising oorooroo ACCt: 77411970STE Name: O ST E Ph: 5407741197 Class Rate: P.O. Box 20068 C/O ED NATT, S PRING WO Roanoke VA 24018 Paytype BL Rate LE Legals Source PH Class 10 Legals Start 3/999 Days 2 Rate Iss 0.00 Words....... 0.00 Lines........ o. oo Depth....... Columns...... ~ 00 Graphic..... 0 ~'~' St Words. Free Day 0 ^ Boxed Ad Copy Line LEGAL NOTICE ROAN Sort String On Hold Product Code ^ Ad Killed Comments Reaso 4T540-981-3415 u"$1 Mar. 5, 1999 The Roanoke Times C~10'06AM p1/1 Adid: HOUDT FERGUSON NAT LECaL NoncE Disp Rate: ao~tNokE courrrv BOARD OF 9UPERV190RS Credit Status: The R°'"°"` ~""`" Board °' Supcrvixns rr~ll hold a public neann; at 7 am en Tue~y, nnaran ;O, 1©fl, in tno Basra Re I Re UeSt rtgeetln: r>`em or the ra~znoae P Y q Cour>ty aGminBt2tbn Center, Rep: 35 ~Ob Eorn~rd Dri.ro, R»noko, YA on the etition o} S rin6• p , p wood ,moc olo~LLC, to ro~no aDDreaimataly i0 Dorm from ^ TFN R4 and C2 oonditiorral to C/1 condhonalicr retail sale_and 2 Stop 3h 6/99 obtain a Specal uae Permit !or ia34iocd ~e3burantsanddri,e• SnrU~, IOC 3te01n the tlClnltyof 127 Price 118 14 Br~mamtan Awnuo (Route =21)ano Eectrlc Roao cROUte . 5191, Ca~.2 Serln: rv~.s+erizi Discount 11.81 DCtriC'I. 3.00 Commis 0 00 A oopv M the applioatcn e awilo 6~o for inopoctian in tha . Oopartn,ont or Pbnnl~ and 1 Net 106.33 zoning, e204 Bernard Dri,e, 0 St Tax 0.00 ~~ bRh 9, >~ 0 Fed Tax 0.00 Mary M. Allen, Ctrk cio9sas:,, Total 106.33 Payment 0.00 App Cr. 0.00 Balance 0.00 R 3 Tear Sheets PO # n for Discount E-mail discount, Editions DC, 109341E classified advertising oo/oo/oo '540-981-3415 ~ Mar. 5, 1999 CT10'01 AM X1/1 The Roanoke Times Acct: 5403820505HASH Name: HASH INVEST~/IENTS LLC Ph: 5103820505 Class Rate: Disp Rate: P O BOX 522 Credit Status: OK CHRISTIANS BUR VA 240?3 Reply Request Paytype BL Rate LE Legals Rep: 35 Source PH Class 10 Legals ^ TFN Start 3/9/99 Days 2 Rate Iss 2 Stop 3/16199 O Oo Words....... 101 P~ 0 0o Lines........ 2? Discount 0.00 Depth....... 2?.0o Commis Columns...... 1 Net 0 0o Graphic..... 0 St Tax O o0 St Words. 0 Fed Tax Free Day 0 ^ Boxed Ad Total Payment Copy Line LEGA L NOT ICE ROAN App Cr. Sort String Balance On Hold Product Code Tear Sheets ^ Ad Killed PO # Comments Reason for Discount LEG~I. NO~1CE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF 9UPERV190R3 The Roano Me Cavnty Board of superviao na ..al hoa ~ p~ero hm nn, at ? 0.m. en Tue~dsy, n9an:n.3, Lc69, In the Bozro Meetlne Room or the Raanoke Caurrpr aGmin~tratrn 0.mer, ^J"i04 8ernarC Drn~e, Foanoke. UA, on tho potAcn of Haah imo~nnrxs ~~C, to ootaln ~ S poe tai lru Pu rmlt to opranm a uaod aubmob do doalmoh~p, looated at ?EfA Williamm~ RoaC, Hollino Magiotonal D iat riot. A oopr M the application e a~ailatle br inspection in the 96 66 Department of Pbnniry and . 2ornnei j209 Berntad Drite, 9.67 RCanoke, va. Date] n~arcn 3 LE6 0.00 . nlary M. Alien Ck'rk ~~~~' 86.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 E-mail discount, Editions DC. Adid: 109340E claaeifiedadvertiaing 4P540-981-3415 G$ Mar. 5, 1999 09~55AM p1/1 ~~/~~/~~ The Roanoke Times Adid: 109339`, Acct: 5407741197WILB Name: WILBURN, VAUGHN Ph: 5407741197 Class Rate : Disp Rate: aoANO~e"courEiTv C/O ED NATT Credit Status: OK EOARD OF SUPEFVISOPS The F'ranol.e Caunly Ebald of BOX 20068 P O s~carv~~ons ~~u hoa a o~m,~ . . n~nn~ at i 0.m en Tue~dy. ROANOKE VA 24018 Reply Request ~1amh 29, 1999, ~n +he Board n9eetin: woom m the rt~zno~e CourrOr Aomin~tratbn Cemer, Paytype BL Rate LE Legals Rep: 35 ~°4 ~rn~r° Drnro, ~,"°`°, v~, on me Detnpn or vz4:nn Source PH Class 10 Legals ^ TFN wuournmcm~inn5psultl~o Pormit ~ oon°truet mini woa. n°~~, ~°caNe .n !!,o T2oo 61~c1r °f ESrron~ {2»d, H~Ilinn Start 3/9/99 Days 2 Rate Iss 2 Stop 3h 6/99 M~~~ro~ ci~tri°! A o°pN d the aC Dloalien e a`Allah~G !O! In~pG°llOn In !hG 0.00 Words. """ 101 Price 96 66 D""''"`"! °' Pbnn~r~ and . 20n~nei 7209 Bernard Drite, 0.00 Lines........ 27 Discount 9.67 Roano~e.YA. ozmo. n~en:n s L°EO De th....... 0.00 p 27.00 Commis 0.00 Mary" ^'t^ Clerk tioass~:,i Columns...... 1 Net 86.99 0.00 Graphic..... 0 St Tax 0.00 0.00 St Words. 0 Fed Tax 0.00 Free Day 0 ^ Boxed Ad Total 86.99 Paymertt 0.00 Copy Line LEGAL NOTICE ROA App Cr. 0.00 Sort String Balance 0.00 On Hold Product Code Tear Sheets ^ Ad Killed PO # Comments Reason for Discount E-mail discount, Editions DC. classified advertising ooroo/oo Acct: 5403877193WILD Ph: 5103877193 CIO GARY HUFFMAN 1507 ASHLEY DR. SALEM VA 4i' 540-981-3415 l'$ Mar. 5, 1999 C~i 9'43 AM (~ 1/1 The Roanoke Times Name: WILDvvOOD DEVELOPMENT, IN Class Rate: Disp Rate: Credit Status: OK 2x153 Reply Request Adid: 109337° LEGAL NOTICE ROANOKE COUMV BOARD OF 9UPERVISOR3 The Reanotie Caun<~ Board of Supenixo rv~ll hob a publio hmhn: at 7 0.m. cn Tua?ay, naan:n 1S, L909, In the Board nleetin: Pcem yr the Fbanoke Covrrty Adminetratcn Cenkr, ?204 Bernar0 DrNe hbanoke, PaytypeBL Rate LE Legals Rep: 35 VA,cn,tnputilioncfVJldwmd OeVe IODmenf Ino. t0 R7~ne Source PH Class 10 Legals ^ TFN 14?acrt"7romAC•1toR•ito tonntrutt crnglo family dotao hod ro~danoo~ boatod ~ Sn Start 3/9/99 Days 2 Rate Iss 2 Stop 3116/99 at~b~ ~~~ no ti o° i~i, F.~ySt~te r b I 0 i~ r;o±. ~~ Words....... 109 Pfl(~ 100.24 a~.aila6le for inapeoiion in the Department of Pb nn ~rL! and o.oo Lines........ 28 Discount 10.02 zcn~net s2o, Bernard Drive, CjQ Depth....... 28.00 Commis 0.00 D teal: nk~n;h 9 1K;8 Columns...... 1 Net 90.22 mars F1 Alkn Cbrk tloass;D1 0 0o Graphic..... 0 St Tax 0.00 ~ ~'~ St Words. 0 Fed Tax 0.00 Free Day 0 ^ Boxed Ad Total 90.22 Payment 0.00 Copy Line LEGAL NOT ICE ROAN App Cr. 0.00 Sort String Balance 0.00 A copy cH the apPlcatien a On Hold Product Code Tear Sheets ^ Ad Killed PO # Comments Reason for Discount E-mail discount, Editions DC. classified advertising oorooroo Acct: 5403424022BR0 W Ph: 5403424022 2603 RUTROUGH ROA ROANOKE Paytype BL Source PH Start 3/9/99 4s 540-981-3415 ~$ Mar. 5, 1999 @ 10'32 AM ~ 1/1 The Roanoke Times ' Adid: 109346E Name: BROWN, RANDALL W. LEG:.L NOTICE CIasS Rate: Disp Rate: I:oANo~E ceuNrv BOARD OF 9UPEFV190R9 D Credit Status: OK The i2eano he Caun<y Boarcl 01 $upemxr~ will hold a publio hea rin: ak 7 0.m. On Tuoda y. VA 24014 I Re uest R r~1an: n 2s, i~a, In the Bozra ^,«t~n: gem °f th` ~'°°k` e p y q Cbunty Adminialm/cn (krtler, Rate LE Legals Rep: 35 2'+04 Bem210 Drrve, PDBnoke, ~.ra, to roccroidcr khu pokilion et Rznwll t^Ayne 8rorrn m Class 10 Legals ^ TFN re:ane 11.93 acres from AG•3 tcARandcbbin~spo¢olLho Pormit tia ollow ~ 9•holo golf Days 2 Rate Iss 2 Stop 3/16199 bbo4 oaf p tough 1Pmd virdcn h"a~~4erol Disk riot. A copy °I this ap pfSat ion e o.oo Words....... 112 Price 100.24 a~olleEle for inOpeczion .n the Department of P6 nn~rta and 0 00 Lines........ 2E3 Discount 10.02 z°ninei 5204 Bernard Drite, . o oo De th....... P 28 0o Commis 0.00 ROanokz, vA Dat<d h'Stih 9 L'~9 M M Al Ck I! . Columns...... 1 Net 90.22 r . to 1arY (10954G51 ~.oo Graphic..... 0 St Tax 0.00 o.oo St Words. 0 Fed Tax 0.00 Free Day 0 ^ Boxed Ad Total 90.22 Payment 0.00 Copy Line LEGAL NOTI CE ROAN App Cr. 0.00 Sort String Balance 0.00 On Hold Product Code Tear Sheets PO # ^ Ad K~Iled Comments Reason for Discount E-mail discount, E-mail discount, Editions DC, classified advertising ooJooJOo 4540-981-3415 ('~ Mar. 5, 1999 010~3AAM p1J1 The Roanoke Times ' Adid: 109348C Acct: 54098393126. ~~ Name: GENTRY, LOCKE, RAKES & MO LEGAL NOTCE Ph: 5409839312 Class Rate: Disp Rate: RDANO~E couNrv EfOrP,D Of 9U PERVISOR9 C/O (\~ IKE PLACE, TRITON, The Roan,k~ a~~~,r e°art! °+ Credit Status: OK 9ucan,;ac ns ,.;,, h°d , c~bric P. O. BOX 40013 mm~n: at 7 0.m, on Tue~y, AAOrc n ^.3, 1~0, in tna EoIDO ROANOKE VA 24038-0013 R I R Uest ngee,in:F?<?emo,tneRaanoae ep y eq ~~n<y acmrnt,r„tn Cprt,or, Paytype BL Rate LE Leaals Rep: 35 6244 Eornmd Griw, Rmnolo, VA, ,n the petRicn ~ T~aon t t , h l ' Source PH Class 10 Legals ^ TFN wro a l o .or an C CCs (Fin r°~^~ 11.66 aoree fiom G2 cvrdAcral tv G2 cvnditlenai tcamern mee~sinzcommon Start 3/9J99 Days 2 Rate Iss 2 Stop 3116/99 "~ oe`'in' s"`"~ "'~ P<r~ mrt b conSruct a 100 Not cel- ~UGr mG Hope li ><Ikor, 1]C7UC ~t ?26 North Elm trio Rood, 0 00 Words....... 120 p(~ 107.40 onwm A,a;wtl~l D~eti~.,. A copy of ihn ~p plc~tdn c 0 00 Lines........ 30 Discount 10.74 a~0i~ab~e ror inepectiCn in the . Depth ..... 30.00 Commis 0.00 Department of Pbnn~ "and Zomns, 6104 Bernmd~ri~e, ~~ .. Columns...... 1 Net 96.66 Rwroke, VA. Dana n~erens ~ 0 0o Graphic..... 0 St Tax 0.00 ^Aar~rM.Alti?n Cork il~~~ Q ~Q St Words. 0 Fed Tax 0.00 Free Day 0 ^ Boxed Ad Total 96.66 Payment 0.00 Copy Line LEGAL NOT ICE ROAN App Cr. 0.00 Sort String Balance 0.00 On Hold Product Code Tear Sheets ^ Ad Killed PO # Comments Reason for Discount E-mail discount, Editions DC, classified advertising ooroo/oo ~P540-981-3415 ~ Mar. 5, 1999 The Roanoke Times CS10'46AM Q1/1 Acct: 54098393126. ~~ Name: GENTRY, LOCKE, RAKES & I~~1O Adid: Ph: 5409839312 Class Rate: Disp Rate: I.EG~i~ tioncE ROANOkE COUNTY BOARD OF $UPERYI$OP,$ CIO ~AIKE PLACE, TRITON, Credit Status: OK s~p~xn ,;; h;b;°o b,°; P O. BOX 40013 hGOrin: at ~ 0.m. °n T~~y, ROANOKE VA 24038-0013 McEt R: RO~~ the nt~znoke Reply Request burl aGmin~'t2tbn C~rtter, Paytype BL Rate LE Leaals Rep: 35 x04 Bernar0 Crn,~e, Fbanoke, L~, on tho pot ition ~ rrilon PCS (Gm° Srnpnob Cnun:n Source PH Class 10 Legals ^ TFN '°°°tain~Sps°~`r°P°`n'~' tooonotruota120footoollutar monopole tevrer, located at Start 3/9/99 Days 2 Rate Iss 2 Stop 3116199 lEE7 Elootro Goad, VJndaor NIlbh.lygiahrblDbtrot. oop;~M thcapplbatbn earail• O oQ words....... 105 p>~ 96,66 p a Department of Pbnn~rg and o. 00 Lines........ 2? Discount 9.6? Zon~net $204 Bernard Drix, R~a~~, YA. 0 0o Depth....... 2? oe Commis 0.00 °,a~'t;"~~~ c~r~ , Columns...... 1 Net 86.99 I (iogs4s 0 0o Graphic..... 0 St Tax 0.00 0 0o St Words. 0 Fed Tax 0.00 Free Day 0 ^ Boxed Ad Total 86.99 Paymerrt 0.00 Copy Line LEGAL NOTI CE ROAN App Cr. 0.00 Sort String Balance 0.00 ble ter in~ ectl°n .n the On Hold Product Code Tear Sheets ^ Ad Killed PO # Comments Reason for Discount E-mail discount, 109348 Editions DC, C 0 V E R FAX S H E E T Clerk to the Board To: Roanoke Times Legal Advertising Fax #: Subj: Legal Notices Date: March 3, 1999 Pages: 4, including this cover sheet. COMI~~NTS: Please advertise the attached legal notices in the Roanoke Times on the following dates: Tuesday, March 9, 1999 Tuesday, March 16, 1999 If you have any questions, please contact me at 772-2003. cc: Arnold Covey, Engineering & Inspections From the desk of... Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board County of Roanoke P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke„ VA 24018 Phone: 540-772-2003 Fax:540-772-2193 RKE r~~';~?D SUPERVISORS TEL~540-~72-2193 No . Receiver Transmitter Date Time Mode Pages Result Transmit Canfirmation Report • 001 • RT-LEGAL • RKE BOARD SUPERVISORS • Mar 04'99 821 • 01'49 • Norm • 04 • OK Mar 04'99 821 Elmer: IMPORTANT! ! ! MARCH 23 Board Meeting Brent Robertson is getting ready to send out the letters to the culturaUsocial service agencies telling them what time to show up on March 23 . There are also 9 public hearings that night including 3 cellular towers, the Glen Mary property, the previously denied golf course in Vinton AND the Special Use Permit for the South County School. Do you want to have tape Cultural and Social Services agencies speak first (probably about 40 speakers at 3 minutes each - 2 hours usually) OR do you want to do the public hearings first (my guess there will be people to speak on the golf course, and probably lots of people on the South County School) for another 2 hours or so. So...rezonings first or cultural-social service agencies first? Either way the meeting will probably last at least 4 hours and will probably fill up the meeting room. Mary A 2/25/99 O ~~- 2 ~~:oo~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~a~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~~~ LEGAL NOTICE Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their 7:00 p.m. session on Tuesday, March 23, 1999 in the Board Meeting Room at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive S. W. on the petition of Roanoke County and the Kroger Company to vacate as public right-of-way a portion of Garman Road, recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 51, Fort Lewis Estates Subdivision and located in the Catawba Magisterial District. A copy of the documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Community Development, located at the Roanoke County Administration Center. Given under my hand this 3rd day of March , 1999. `~72~c~,.y.. ~. a,c.c.e~..i Mary H. Allen, CMC, Clerk to the Board Roanoke County Board of Supervisors PLEASE PUBLISH IN THE ROANOKE TIMES ON Tuesday, March 9, 1999 Tuesday, March 16, 1999 Mail affidavit to: Mary H. Allen, Clerk to the Board County of Roanoke P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 Direct the bill for publication to: Arnold Covey Department of Community Development County of Roanoke P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their 7:00 p.m. session on Tuesday, March 23, 1999 in the Board Meeting Room at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive S. W. on the petition of Lowe's Corporation to vacate as public rights-of-way Washington Road recorded in Plat 1, page 363, Pinkard County Subdivision in the Cave Spring Magisterial District A copy of the documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Community Development, located at the Roanoke County Administration Center. Given under my hand this 3rd day of March , 1999. .~ . Mary H. Allen, CMC, Clerk to the Board Roanoke County Board of Supervisors PLEASE PUBLISH IN THE ROANOKE TIMES ON Tuesday, March 9, 1999 Tuesday, March 16, 1999 Mail affidavit to: Mary H. Allen, Clerk to the Board County of Roanoke P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 Direct the bill for publication to: Arnold Covey Department of Community Development County of Roanoke P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their 7:00 p.m. session on Tuesday, March 23, 1999 in the Board Meeting Room at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive S. W. on the petition of Charles R. Simpson to Vacate a Portion of a 15-foot Drainage Easement on Plat Showing Section No. 1, Edgemont of Vinton, Plat Book 16, Pg 41, and Further Shown on Lot 5, Block 3, Section 2, Edgemont of Vinton, Plat Book 18, Page 130, and Revised Plat of Section No. 2, Edgemont of Vinton, Plat Book 18, Page 171, in the Vinton Magisterial District (Tax Map No. 61.02-7-1) A copy of the documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Community Development, located at the Roanoke County Administration Center. Given under my hand this 3rd day of March , 1999. ~• Mary H. Allen, CMC, Clerk to the Board Roanoke County Board of Supervisors PLEASE PUBLISH IN THE ROANOKE TIMES ON Tuesday, March 9, 1999 Tuesday, March 16, 1999 Direct the bill for publication to: Charles R. Simpson, Inc. Mail affidavit to: 3420 Electric Road SW Mary H. Allen, Clerk to the Board Roanoke, VA 24018 P. O. Box 29800 Acount #32749000 Roanoke, VA 24018 oaroo~oo The Roanoke Times Aot~: 7722080rke/ Name: COUNTY OF ROANOKE ~l:ca~ NoncE Ph: 5407722080 Class Rate: Disp Rate: riotce ie hereby gi~nen b ell ATTN.: ARNOLD COVEY Credit Status: R e o~l~ ~°unty Board Hof i h l i P. O. BOX 29$00 6upervixrs w o ll o d a puM hearing at their 7:00 p.m. ~• ROANOKE VA 24018 Reply Request gl,~a°"nTt~ Bo~ad~Meetn~' Rmm et 11e Ibanolae .booty Paytype BL Rate LE Legals Rep: 35 AAmInBt2tbn Center, 5104 gorroro Orho strc on too potl. tbn a1 Roanowe County and the Source PH Class 10 Legals ^ TFN Kroger C]moeny b leca~ a5 puGUC rlghtoT-ways portbr. of Garman Road, raoorded in Plat Start 319199 Days 2 Rate Iss 2 Stop 3116199 EQ°~tos sea ~ls o~ ~"~d looatad in tha Catawba Magio• a.oa ...... bVOrds. 137 p~ 12$,88 terlal ~L+trlDt. A Dopy of tha dooumanto roktodto thin requoat may bra Q.00 Lines. 36 Djgppl,~~ O,Dd e:mmined in the office of the o Oa Depth. 38.00 Commis 0,00 Department of Community ooabed at the Dexlopment,y i Columns...... 1 Net 128.88 , ROD r101~ COV "`7 ~1d1Y1 iniGlration Ltn}tr. o.oQ Graphic..... 0 St Tax 0.00 OMen untler my nantl this 9rtl d~r~f RAarch, wee. 0.00 St WOrdS. 0 Fed TaX 0.00 t~ ~aaA~en, cMC, clerk to Free Da y 0 ^ Boxed Ad Total 128.8$ SuDerbors~unty Board or Payment 0.00 cio9arial Copy Line LEGAL NOTICE Notic App Cr. 0.00 Sort String ~~~ 0 ~ On Hold Product Code Tear Sheets Ad Killed PO # Gomments Reason for Discount Adld: 1093711 Editions DC, classified advertising 'R540-981-3415 R$j Mar. 5, 1999 X12:25 RM ^1!1 oorooroo The Roanoke Times Acct: 5407722080SIMP Name: SIMPSON; CHARLES R., INC. Adid: 10937 IEGAI N071CE Ph: 5407722080 Class Rate: Disp Rate: Notoe ie hereby ~i~en #~ all in#ere~ted per~on~ that the 3420 ELECTRIC RD., S. W. Roanoke Coun#y Board of Credit Status: OK 6uperviaon will hold a pubiio ROANOKE VA 24018 Reply Request Paytype BL Rate LE Legals Rep: 35 Source PH Class 10 Legals ^ TFN Start 319199 Days 2 Rate Iss 2 Stop 3116199 0.00 Words....... 157 p~ 0.00 Lines........ 39 Discount 0.00 Depth....... 39.00 Commis Columns...... 1 Net 0.0o Graphic..... 0 St Tax 0.00 St Words. 0 Fed Tax Free Day 0 ^ Boxed Ad Total Payment Copy Line LEGAL NOTI CE Notic App Cr. Sort String Balance On Hold Product Code Tear Sheets ^ Ad Killed PO # Comments Reason for Discount nearlnpat their 7:Cq D.m. ses- sion on Tuestlay, March 23, 7~ In the BDartl Meetlnp RCOm at th@ roarOke County Atlminl¢t rtlon Can#ar, ?204 Sornard Driro S. W. on tho potltnn of Garlaa R. SMpaon to Vaca#a a Podion of a 15• foo# Draina~a 6aaamonl on Pla# fihowirr,~~ Saotion Nv. 1 Edgemont aFVinton, Pkt Soo~r 16, P~ 41, and Further Shown vn lot 5, Bbck 9, Sec#bn 2, Etlgemont Gy Ylnton, Pkt Book 139 62 18, Ps=e 171, in the Yintvn . Mgrbterial Di~trct iTax Map 0.00 no, os.oz-7.1~ A copy of tha dacumanta 0.00 rt?Iatetlt0 tnls request may De oaminatl In tho otrea of tno 139.62 Dopartmant of Community Dexlopment, boa#ed at the 0,00 Roanoko County.4dminialratbn 0.00 Conmr. Giren undo my hand /his 3rd ~ ~ dtty cf Merc h, 19E8. I ~,p~ Mary H. Atlen, CMC, Clerk iv 0 00 the Bvad . Roanoke County Boars of 0.00 ~io~s ~ i 0.00 Editions DC, claesifiedadvertiaing 'R 540.981-3415 Q~ Mar. 5, 1999 C12~14PM piN ooroaoQ The Roanoke Times ~ Acd: 7722080rkec Name: COUNTY OF RC~ANOKE Ph: 5407722080 Class Rate: Disp Rate: LEGAL NOTCE Netbe i° heroby ~~en t° eli ATTN.: ARNOLD COVEY Credit Status: iniemsted persons that the ~°P~N~ ii h b °P ~G P. O. BOX 29800 , w nearrnYat their I:oo p.m. xs- ROANOKE VA 24018 Re I Re UeSt P Y q lion on ruestlay, March 23, ~ m tre Boartl upethr Room at tre RoanoNe County Paytype BL Rate LE Legals Rep: 35 AGminlat r~tlon Conear, '3206 E'crnard oritie s. w. cn tha potikion of Loo's torpootion Source PH Class 10 Legals ^ TFN to '~°~ '~ pu~c righknc'. »ey Wa°hin~bin Road reo«ded in Plat 1, pay! 889, Pinicaid Start 319139 Da 2 Rate Iss YS 2 Sto 3116199 P s°; ^~ Su6dirnion in the (bx p ^~ I,te~istenal Drelriot. A copy of the documents a.00 Words....... 128 Puce 121.72 reratetlto this request may De e>mmined In the otrrce of the 0.00 Lines........ 34 DjsUpu~ 0.00 Department of Community Dowiopmant, tx~tm at tho 0 00 - - - - .. Depth. 34.00 Commis 0.00 Roanoln County Adm inialratio n Contar. . Columns...... 1 Net 121.72 Giron undor my hand Chia 3rd day of Mar°h, iota. o.oo Graphic..... 0 St Tax 000 wry a~Alen, CMC, clerk to O.oO St Words. 0 Fed Tax 0.00 s~oer: oo~untl` Board of t2098T28~ Free Day 0 ^ Boxed Ad Total 121.72 Copy Line LEGAL NOTICE Notic Payment 0.00 Sort String App Cr. 0.00 Balarx~ 0.00 On Hold Product Code Tear Sheets ^ Ad Killed PO # Comments Reason for Discount Adid: 109372E Editions DC, GEN i RY ~OCKE RAKES & MQORE Attorneys at Law 540.983.9300 Facsimile 540.983.9400 Direct No. 540.983.9312 February 19, 1999 Bob L. Johnson 8276 Olsen Road Roanoke, VA 24019 Re: Triton PCS, Inc. (A) 925 N. Electric Road (Pinkerton Chevrolet) (B) 4135 W. Main Street (C) 1887 Electric Road (Good Shepherd Church) Dear Mr. Johnson: 10 Franklin Road, S.E. Post Office Box 40013 Roanoke, Virginia 24038-001 3 We represent Triton PCS, Inc., which is licensed by the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") to develop a digital telecommunications system in the Roanoke Valley for AT&,T. The Planning Commission considered each of these applications at its meeting on February 2. As you have by now heard, the Planning Commission voted 4 to 1 to deny the application for issuance of a special use permit for the construction and use of a 160' monopole at the Pinkerton Chevrolet property. The Planning Commission also unanimously approved the extension of the US Cellular monopole from 120' to 160' at the Salem water tank site in Glenvar. There was no citizen opposition to either of these projects. In addition, the Planning Commission voted 4 to 1 to recommend approval of the 120' monopole at the Good Shepherd Church on Route 419 at Oak Grove. We have now learned, however, that the Planning Commission passed a motio~i to reconsider the applications with respect to the Pinkerton Chevrolet and Good Shepherd Church sites. A special meeting of the Planning Commission has been scheduled for March 16 at 7:00 p.m. for these purposes. The Board of Supervisors will now consider the matters on March 23, rather than on Tuesday. The hearing on the application for the proposed extension of the existing monopole located at 4135 W. Main Street (Route 11/460) will go forward as planned on Tuesday night. I write to provide you with some additional information about each of these projects for your consideration prior to the Board of Supervisors meeting on the 23rd. Given the nature of these projects and the fact that we are the first applicants to be considered under the new Roanoke county telecommunications tower ordinance, the public hearing on February 2 was quite lengthy. It is my hope that this information will answer some questions you have and shorten our presentation on February 23. Triton has selected 24 sites in the Roanoke Valley to complete its digital telecommunications network for AT&T. Nine are located in Roanoke County, twelve in Roanoke City, two in Salem and one in Vinton. Of these, five are attached to existing city or county water towers, three are 14722\12\545276. I GENTRY ~OCKE RAKES & MOORE Bob L. Johnson February 19, 1999 Page -3- a tower at a height less than requested will result in an inferior network and require another telecommunication tower to support it. This is contrary to the premise contained in the new ordinance favoring non-proliferation of towers in the County. The real issue with respect to these monopoles is their visibility and neighborhood compatibility. Triton has fully complied with all of the County's requirements under the new ordinance with respect to these applications except one -- we cannot make the monopoles invisible. There is not a single location in Roanoke County from which our proposed towers will not be seen from someone's vantage point. That is the only disadvantage of wireless technology. It must have a tower to support certain segments of the network. Triton has, however, designed the proposed monopoles so as to minimize as much as passible any adverse impact on surrounding properties. Additionally and significantly, the monopole design allows for the maximum collocation opportunities for other providers so that over time the County can realize its. goal of having fewer towers, rather than more. Pinkerton Chevrolet Site SpeciFically with respect to the Pinkerton Chevrolet location, the staff recommended denial of the monopole and the Planning Commission expressed concern about the height of the monopole as the primary reason for recommending denial. Additionally, several members expressed skepticism that the owner of the Budgetel Inn across the street in Salem had refused Triton's request to locate a monopole there. Carol Rizzio, the Assistant County Planner assigned to this project, said that she called and spoke with the owner's wife who indicated that her husband would now be willing to lease the property. The owner had previously and emphatically advised Triton that he would not permit it to locate a monopole on the property. After that rejection, Triton negotiated a lease for the Pinkerton Chevrolet site. We do not believe it appropriate or relevant that the owner of the Budgetel Inn may now be willing to lease (if that is the case), and the discussion among the members of the Planning Commission concerning this issue prejudiced the outcome. There was no opposition expressed at the community meeting on February 1, and no citizens spoke in opposition at the Planning Commission meeting. After much discussion, Ms. Hooker and other commissioners expressed concern about the height of the tower, and we were unable to convince them that a tower height less than 160' would be insufficient. A shorter monopole will require the construction of another monopole between the Pinkerton Chevrolet site and the next tower location in the network in order to fill the gap. Since the hearing we have prepared 14722\l2\545276.1 GENTRY L~CKE RAKES & MORE Bob L. Johnson February 19, 1999 Page -5- be denied due to the fact that the property is surrounded on three sides by nearby residences and neighborhoods. Triton has been unable to locate other alternative sites in the City or the County along this stretch of Route 419 that work from a radio frequency perspective or are available for lease. There are no collocation opportunities in the vicinity. As a result, Triton leased a portion of the rear of the property owned by the Good Shepherd Church for the location of its 120' monopole. Adjoining and nearby properties consist of a mix of general commercial and residential uses, including the Allstate building, Owens & Company Realtors, a bank, general offices, Oak Grove Elementary School, a retail gas station and strip shopping malls with retail tenants and offices. A community meeting was held on February 1 at the County Administration building. Approximately 10 citizens attended. A few of them expressed opposition at the Planning Commission hearing, primarily related to the monopole's visibility. The staff recommended denial of the monopole at this location, and suggested that the County maybe amenable to a series of shorter towers along Route 419 as opposed to one 120' monopole at this location. This, however, runs contrary to the non-proliferation objectives of the ordinance, and would eliminate the collocation opportunities afforded by the proposed monopole. Mr. Thomason (in whose district this project is located) was unconvinced that a location in Roanoke City could not be obtained, and moved to recommend denial. We suggested that even if a site could be found, a 120' monopole across the street from the church property would have no less effect on County residents in the immediate area. After discussion similar to the one pertaining to the Pinkerton site, the Planning Commission voted against the motion. Mr. Robinson made a substitute motion to approve, and the Planning Commission recommended approval of the request for a special use permit on a 4 to 1 vote. As I said earlier, it is impossible to construct a tower anywhere in Roanoke County without it being seen from somewhere. Triton has demonstrated its attempts to locate elsewhere on existing structures, that none are available, and that there are no collocation opportunities anywhere nearby. There simply are no other reasonable alternatives in this area. In addition, Triton has had additional propagation maps made of the proposed tower at 120' and 100' to show the degradation in the level and quality of service at the lower height. Copies of these maps are enclosed and clearly demonstrate that the monopole, at 120', is the minimum required at this location. Copies have also been sent to the Planning Staff and to the members of the Planning Commission for their review. 14722\12\545276.1 C b ac v a 0 1 1 1 ~: ®a' a ~' o o ~ ~ o- > N ~C7 ~1.-.^..^r m, o o>>> m, ~1 o - Z m- m n ~ m ~ ~~ ~ v m -r m 3 ~ o m, c c o_ C N G a , n o ~- - , .p - -c N a ~ r a - - N , ~ n o, a_vp~ .c ~ ~ .- a m r ~+ - m N .. o co > > , ~a m ~c r0 ~ ~ a m 3 .. u a o a ~ a o cma• rn w^ n A C- O ~a mAm O ~ ~ c- v m c o v f < < ~ ip c < m ~ ~p r ^ m ~ ~ ^ .. ~ o ~ i c V I m r rnmm o a C71a ~, ~ .r, n m 3 m 3 ~ W N Z N G 00 `~J A CIr C7 o m E ~ n 1 u a o E' n J mvc>~-----_~- ~ ~ a a m i n n]]] m 3 O ~ '~ n 3 ~ -~~i7 .- m ~ i - aim -+ a m z c o_ r- m< 2 ~ o - ~ .p. --< N a ~c c-n .-~ ~] 7 6 C 6 ~ - Nn j A rD d i~ V o o ~n ] ] 7 ~ o { ca ~n ~ ~ D Qi 3 4 O 277 n - ~ - Q1 a o C Ql a 2 0 ma c- o .n o a -- ~~ ^ 2 m A m N. ~ r~ V m r r ~ n r m ~y < m < m < o ~ ~ n ~p ~ ~- m ~ ~ - .. ~ o v i m r - ~~ m to n 2 (7{ a m a ID ~ 3 ~ 3 3 ~ v w N N Z 0 N O M ~ ~ O j (fl 'J C7 ~-.r JJ ~ 6 D - Z m~ a o n o 0 0~ O ~l - Rl o ~~ II ~ m n 3 3- m C] m m -i P a m c O ~ r a~ n a- .- z o A N G -~ N a ~ ra - aio N~ ~ I -ao.avy,m ~ ~~ ^ o m + ~ ,. o cn > > z ~ o V ~ o r~+n r O m ~ .. o a o O a o GUI a' N - QI .-. 0 0 27 C - O O a mxta ~ m r- v _ r r A e r m v - ~ ~ m < cD o m < 0 01 U1 ,- m ~ ~O .. ^ £ V 1 m ~- .- III m tD p c OI a ~. -p a LD 3 ~ 3 n 3 w V N ,~. . -yp a e.. -era ~:~~ '~~' - f U1 ~C7~_ _e. a ~ ® a a > > > ~ ~ ~ F 6~ .. m ~ ~ ~ O 0 3 ~ i7 ^ a m i c c a _ r i n i n a .- ~ z o ~ O K r O -- - ~ .- n n n~ _ ff A tG `G ~1 ~ .~ .~ a V m O !O > > > QI a cc ro r iD m O n ~ ~ ~ a C N ' n o 23 ! - O a m ~ m Q m ~ r ~ m ra < m < ~ ° v .- o .. £ i ~ r m c n CI{ n ~'ia C ~ Q' 3 ~ ~ v A v 0 z ~1 V A • .. ~ ~r.°'~'~ o~ t . ~ ~, ~. - .`: T! 3 ~ o f c D -n-m m y Q m< ~ ~ N u r~ `J - m v3 p D am - m _~ .p a ~ r- ~ - a 0 L n ~`- ¢~ O ~ ~~ ~~ r ,~' o I ' ' o a mvc~~._.___,- m~ o a o~^ m~ a m c a- r o. ~ o ~ ~ ~ a a ~c r- a -- - ~ .- o_a.ava~ ~oro > > ~ QI 0 2 ~ m: ra r- ~0 O 0 a o C o7 a' a. o z c - o a mom m - o ~ m ~~ < m < m < +~ V .- m E V ~ ~ r L'i m iL` o a (TI Q mac"., 3 m 3 3 W v U V O Z a 0 v 0 O c ~7 3 ~ ~ a r' a a -n-m m m ~ Q N < -< N N u m 3 O~ W ? rn~ of a _; ~a ~ ~' tU ~- a GENTRY LOCKS Attorneys at Law i v \KE~ "` ' • `~~ 540.983.9300 February 19, 1999 Post Office Box 4001 3 Roanoke, Virginia 24038-0013 Direct No. 540.983.9312 IO Franklin Road, S.E. Facsimile 540.983.9400 HAND DELIVERED Terrance L. Harrington Director of Planning Roanoke County Dept. of Planning & Zoning 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, VA 24018 Re: Triton PCS, Inc. -Site No. 417 1887 Electric Road (Good Shepherd Lutheran Church) Dear Terry: This will confirm that you have authorized Triton PCS, Inc. to amend its site plan to show a relocation of the proposed site for the monopole further back on the Good Shepherd Church property. We are in the process of revising the site plan, which I expect to deliver to you sometime early next week. As I mentioned, John Slater and I met with the Council of the Good Shepherd Church last night to provide them with some additional information concerning the tower and to answer the questions they may have concerning its relocation. As a result of the meeting, the church council voted unanimously to approve the relocation of the tower. We have requested that evidence of this approval be sent to you in the form of a letter by an authorized representative of the church. One of the council members, Clayton Thomas, abstained. He has written a letter to Chairman Johnson requesting that Triton's petition be denied or delayed in order to permit the church sufficient time to reach an agreement with Triton concerning the relocation of the tower. You will recall that prior to the Planning Commission hearing on February 2, we had asked that Triton be allowed to modify the site plan to reflect the minor change in the location of the tower as requested by the church. At that time, however, we were advised that the plan could not be amended without having to file an amended application, which under the new ordinance would have required us to start from the beginning, resulting in a loss of at least 120 days. In view of the fact that the Planning Commission has requested that this matter be reconsidered at a special public hearing scheduled for March 16, you have advised us that this minor relocation can be made without beginning the process anew. As a result of our meeting last night with the church 14722117 `54b300.1 GENTRY LOCKS RAKES & MARE Terrance L. Harrington February 19, 1999 Page -2- council, there is no need to delay consideration of this matter as requested by Mr. Thomas since the church's concerns about the location of the tower have been satisfied. Thanking you for your continuing cooperation, I am Yours sincerely, GENTRY LOCKS RAKES & MOORS G. Michael Pace, Jr. GMPjr/lgh cc: M ers of the Roanoke County Planning Commission embers of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Vern T. Jordahl, Ph.D. Frank J. Shortall John A. Slater Mr. John Murphy 1 ~i7ZZ? I l X546300. I From: "Timothy Gubala" < ADMO1/TWG > To: "Mary Allen" < ADMO1/M1iA > Date sent: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 11:30:12 + 0000 Subject: Re: Agenda Staff Meeting Copies to: adm01/pmm There will be an executive session item pertaining to condemnation of property from Wachovia Bank followed by a First Reading of the condemnation ordinance. From: "Mary Allen" < ADMO l /MHA > To: Executive Team Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 10:42:59 +0000 Subject: Agenda Staff Meeting Just a reminder that the agenda staff meeting for the March 23 Board meeting will be today at 3 p.m. in the Board Conference Room. If you have any agenda items, please email me the title and plan to attend the meeting. Because there are so many issues scheduled for this meeting, it is important to let me know if you have any items so that we can structure the agenda appropriately. Thanks for your help. Mary Allen -- 1 -- Mon, 15 Mar 1999 13:19:19 ~~It~71 ~ ~ ~/~I x/99 ~ ~o ®®~l oho ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA MARCH 23, 1999 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. The meetings are broadcast live on RVTV, Channel 3, and will be rebroadcast on Thursdays at 7 P.M. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement in order to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings or other programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County, please contact the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772-2005. We request that you provide at least 48-hours notice so that proper arrangements may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call 2. Invocation: 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS D. BRIEFINGS E. NEW BUSINESS i Requ or ap al of t e 99-2000 udg for the Roanoke -~egio I Ai o Co issi n. ne H att, Fin ce Director) F. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA: Approval of these items does not indicate support for, or judge the merits of, the requested zoning actions but satisfies procedural requirements and schedules the Public Hearings which will be held after recommendation by the Planning Commission. 1. First reading of an ordinance to rezone 53.125 acres from AG-3 to PRD to construct a planned residential community located in the 7600 block of Token Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District upon the petition of Grindstone Engineering. 2. First reading of an ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit to replace an existing 30 foot pole with an 80 foot monopole and replace an existing building, located .4 mile north of intersection of Bent Mountain Road and Airpoint Drive, Windsor Hills Magisterial District upon the petition of US Cellular. G. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. First reading of an ordinance amending to adopt minor amendments to the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) H. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Second Reading of an ordinance approving the exercise of an option to purchase agreement with Salem Office Supply, Inc., a for property located at 400 East Main Street, across from the Roanoke County Courthouse, in Salem, Virginia. (John Chambliss, Assistant Administrator) C2~ Second reading of ordinance declaring a parcel of real estate to be surplus and accepting an offer for the sale of same; namely the Penn Forest Boulevard well lot. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 3~J. Second reading of ordinance authorizing the conveyance of a 37.86 acre parcel of real estate located in the City of Salem known as the Lloyd property. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 4. Second reading of ordinance authorizing the construction of and financing for a Local Public Works Improvement Project - Little Brushy Mountain water Project. (Gary Robertson, Utility Director) I. APPOINTMENTS 1. League of Older Americans -Advisory Council 2. Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission 3. Commission for Senior and Physically Challenged Citizens J. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Approval of Minutes -February 23, 1999 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Commission 3 for Senior and Physically Challenged Citizens 3. Donation of a storm drainage easement on property owned by Samuel Reid and Dorothy Stevens. 4. Resolution of support for a Virginia Trails Grant for a Greenway at Green Hill Park. 5. Appropriation of Compensation Board reimbursement for additional capital purchase for the Commonwealth Attorney's Office. 6. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Meadow Creek Road Extension. 7. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Canterbury Park, Section 13. 8. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Grove Park, Section 1 and 2 off site sewer. 9. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Mountain Meadow Estates. 10. Acceptance of water facilities serving Valley Gateway. 11. Resolution requesting that the Department of Corrections allow the use of use inmate labor from Botetourt Correctional Unit on various government projects in Roanoke County. 12. Acceptance of sanitary sewer facilities serving Orchard Park, Section 1. 13. Acceptance of sanitary sewer facilities serving Orchard Park, Section 2. K. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS L. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS 4 M. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS N. REPORTS ~~1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3 Board Contingency Fund ~. ~ Future School Capital Reserve Statement of Expenditures and Revenue for the month ended February 28, 1999 ~ 6~ Update of 1999-2000 Budget Calendar 7. Report of approved changes to the Secondary system of State Highways as of February 1999. 8. Statement of Treasurer's Accountability per Investments and Portfolio Policy, as of February 28, 1999. I • 9. Proclamations signed by tf~e Chairman O. FUNDING REQUESTS FROM HUMAN SERVICES, SOCIAL SERVICES, CULTURAL AND TOURISM AGENCIES. (4:00 P.M.) P. WORK SESSIONS (4TH FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM) Q. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to bode of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (7) actual or probable litigation, condemnation proceedings for public road - Wachovia Bank; 2.1-344 A (7) probable litigation, Akers. EVENING SESSION (7:00 P.M.) R. CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION S. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 5 1. Second reading of an ordinance to rezone approximately 10 acres from R-2 and C-2 conditional to C-2 conditional for retail sales and obtain a Special Use Permit for fast food restaurants and drive-thrus, located in the vicinity of Brambleton Avenue (Route 221) and Electric Road (Route 419), Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Springwood Associates LLC. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) 2. Second reading of an ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to construct mini warehouses, located in the 7200 block of Barrens Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Vaughn Wilburn. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) 3. Second reading of an ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to operate a used automobile dealership, located at 7650 Williamson Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Hash Investments LLC. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) 4. Second reading of an ordinance to rezone 14.7 acres from AG-1 to R-1 to construct single family detached residences, located on the west side of Wildwood Road, north of 1-81, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Wildwood Development Inc. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) Second reading of ordinance to rezone 11.66 acres from C-2 conditional to C-2 conditional to amend the existing condition and obtain a Special Use Permit to construct a 160 foot cellular monopole tower, located at 925 North Electric Road, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Triton PCS (Pinkerton Chevrolet). (Terry Harrington, County Planner) 6~. Second reading of ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to construct a 120 foot cellular monopole tower, located at 1887 Electric Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the petition of Triton PCS (Good Shepherd Church). (Terry Harrington, County Planner) 7. Reconsideration of an Ordinance to rezone 11.93 acres from AG-3 to AR and obtain a Special Use Permit to allow a 9-hole 6 golf course, located in the 2600 block of Rutrough Road, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of Randall Wayne Brown. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) 8. Second reading of ordinance to vacate as public right-of-way a portion of Garman Road recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 51, located in the Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Roanoke County and Kroger Company. (Arnold Covey, Director of Community Development) 9. Second reading of ordinance to vacate as public rights-of-way Washington Road recorded in Plat Book 1, page 363, Pinkard Court Subdivision in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. (Arnold Covey, Director of Community Development) 10. Second reading of ordinance to vacate a portion of a 15-foot drainage easement on plat showing section no. 1, Edgemont of Vinton, plat book 16, pg 41, and further shown on lot 5, block 3, section 2, Edgemont of Vinton, Plat Book 18, page 130, and revised plat of section 2, Edgemont of Vinton, Plat Book 18, page 171, in the Vinton Magisterial District (tax map no. 61.02-7- 1). (Arnold Covey, Director of Community Development) 11. Second reading of an ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit to construct a high school, located on the west side of Brambleton Avenue, west of Pleasant Hill Drive, south of Farmington Drive, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the petition of Roanoke County School Board. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) T. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS U. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS V. ADJOURNMENT ~1~11~71 v ~ ~/11 x/99 ~ ~~ ®®11-~01~ ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA MARCH 23, 1999 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. The meetings are broadcast live on RVTV, Channel 3, and will be rebroadcast on Thursdays at 7 P.M. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement in order to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings or other programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County, please contact the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772-2005. We request that you provide at least 48-hours notice so that proper arrangements may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call 2. Invocation: 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS D. BRIEFINGS i E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request for approval of the 1999-2000 budget for the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission. (Diane Hyatt, Finance Director) F. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA: Approval of these items does not indicate support for, or judge the merits of, the requested zoning actions but satisfies procedural requirements and schedules the Public Hearings which will be held after recommendation by the Planning Commission. 1. First reading of an ordinance to rezone 53.125 acres from AG-3 to PRD to construct a planned residential community located in the 7600 block of Token Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District upon the petition of Grindstone Engineering. 2. First reading of an ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit to replace an existing 30 foot pole with an 80 foot monopole and replace an existing building, located .4 mile north of intersection of Bent Mountain Road and Airpoint Drive, Windsor Hills Magisterial District upon the petition of US Cellular. G. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. First reading of an ordinance amending the Zoning Ordinance - minor revisions. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) H. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Second Reading of an ordinance approving the exercise of an 2 option to purchase agreement with Salem Office Supply, Inc., for property located at 400 East Main Street, across from the Roanoke County Courthouse, in Salem, Virginia. (John Chambliss, Assistant Administrator) 2. Second reading of ordinance declaring a parcel of real estate to be surplus and accepting an offer for the sale of same; namely the Penn Forest Boulevard well lot. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 3. Second reading of ordinance authorizing the conveyance of a 37.86 acre parcel of real estate located in the City of Salem known as the Lloyd property. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 4. Second reading of ordinance authorizing the construction of and financing for a Local Public Works Improvement Project - Little Brushy Mountain water Project. (Gary Robertson, Utility Director) 1. APPOINTMENTS 1. League of Older Americans -Advisory Council 2. Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission 3. Commission for Senior and Physically Challenged Citizens J. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1 • Approval of Minutes -February 23, 1999 3 2. Resolution requestin~c t~iat the Department of Corrections allow Ram -te- used inmate labor from Botetourt Correctional Unit on various government projects. ,c~J ~e~ ~, 3. Donation of a storm drainage easement on property owned by Samuel Reid and Dorothy Stevens. 4. Resolution of support for a Virginia Trails Grant for a Greenway at Green Hill Park. K. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS L. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS M. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS N. REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Future School Capital Reserve 5. Statement of Expenditures and Revenue for the month ended February 28, 1999 6. Update of 1999-2000 Budget Calendar 7. Report of approved changes to the Secondary system of State Highways as of February 1999. 8. Statement of Treasurer's Accountability per Investments and Portfolio Policy, as of February 28, 1999. 4 9. Proclamations signed by the Chairman O. FUNDING REQUESTS FROM HUMAN SERVICES, SOCIAL SERVICES, CULTURAL AND TOURISM AGENCIES. (4:00 P.M.) P. WORK SESSIONS (4TH LOOR CONFERENCE ROOM) ~~ ~ C.4~ 1. Joint~Work Session with School Board - - ~ ~ ~~ elo en th F 9- 000 dget -- Q. EXECUTIVE SESSION pursuant to Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (7) actual or probable litigation, cond mnation proceedings, /,lJq ~"~-~cJ ~ ~ ~~~~~ EVENT G SESSION (7:00 P.M~ R. CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION S. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Second reading of an ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit to construct a high school, located on the west side of Brambleton Avenue, west of Pleasant Hill Drive, south of ~~ Farmington Drive, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the petition of Roanoke County School Board. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) 2. Second reading of an ordinance to rezone approximately 10 acres from R-2 and C-2 conditional to C-2 conditional for retail sales and obtain a Special Use Permit for fast food restaurants and drive-thrus, located in the vicinity of Brambleton Avenue (Route 221) and Electric Road (Route 419), Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Springwood Associates LLC. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) 3. Second reading of an ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to construct mini warehouses, located in the 7200 block of Barrens Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Vaughn Wilburn. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) 5 r 4. Second reading of an ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to operate a used automobile dealership, located at 7650 Williamson Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Hash Investments LLC. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) 5. Second reading of an ordinance to rezone 14.7 acres from AG-1 to R-1 to construct single family detached residences, located on the west side of Wildwood Road, north of 1-81, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Wildwood Development Inc. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) 6. Second reading of ordinance to rezone 11.66 acres from C-2 conditional to C-2 conditional to amend the existing condition and obtain a Special Use Permit to construct a 160 foot cellular monopole tower, located at 925 North Electric Road, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Triton PCS (Pinkerton Chevrolet). (Terry Harrington, County Planner) 7. Second reading of ordinance authorizing a Special Use Permit to construct a 120 foot cellular monopole tower, located at 1887 Electric Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the petition of Triton PCS (Good Shepherd Church). (Terry Harrington, County Planner) Reconsideration of an Ordinance to rezone 11.93 acres from AG-3 to AR and obtain a Special Use Permit to allow a 9-hole golf course, located in the 2600 block of Rutrough Road, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of Randall Wayne Brown. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) 9. Second reading of ordinance to vacate as public right-of-way a portion of Garman Road recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 51, located in the Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Roanoke County and Kroger Company. (Arnold Covey, Director of Community Development) 10. Second reading of ordinance to vacate as public rights-of-way Washington Road recorded in Plat Book 1, page 363, Pinkard Court Subdivision in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. 6