Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout3/14/2000 - Regular9 ROAN ~~~~~ ~F L ~ ~ az Cn~~~# ~~ ~~xx~~a.~.~ 1838 / ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA MARCH 14, 2000 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m. on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. The meetings are broadcast live on RVTV, Channel 3, and will be rebroadcast on Thursdays at 7 P.M. and Saturdays at 4 P.m. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement in order to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings or other programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County, please contact the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772-2005. We request that you provide at least 48-hours notice so that proper arrangements may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call 2. Invocation: John M. Chambliss, Jr. Assistant County Administrator 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS D. BRIEFINGS 1. Report on March Through Time Celebration at Tanglewood Mall on March 24 - 26, 2000. (Mary Allen, Clerk to the Board) 1 ® Recycled Paper 2. Presentation of the Annual Report from the Roanoke Valley Economic Development Partnership. (Phil Sparks, Executive Director) E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request to establish the tax rates in Roanoke County for calendar year 2000 a. Order setting the tax rate on real estate for the calendar year 2000 at the current rate of $1.13 per one hundred dollars of assessed valuation. (Brent Robertson, Budget Director) b. Order setting the tax levy on all classes of personal property at the current rate of $3.50 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation, and machinery and tools for the calendar year 2000 at the current rate of $3.00 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation. (Brent Robertson, Budget Director) 2. Resolution authorizing renewal of a lease of real estate for a public safety radio tower site on Tinker Mountain. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 3. Authorization to give notice to the Commonwealth Transportation Board to proceed with the abandonment of a 30' x 118' prescriptive right-of-way, generally located 250' from the intersection of Mountain View Road and Laurel Glen Road in the Vinton Magisterial District. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) F. FIRST READINGS OF ORDINANCES 1. First reading of ordinance extending the current franchise agreement with Adelphia (Salem) Cable for ninety days. (Joseph B. Obenshain, Senior Assistant County Attorney) 2. First Reading of an ordinance to vacate a 10' private greenspace easement located between lots 3 and 4 in Section 3 of the Lillies of the Garden, located in the Cave Spring Magisterial District upon the petition of Strauss Construction Corporation. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) 2 3. First reading of ordinance to vacate an 81 square foot section of Fairway View Trail in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District upon the petition of George Baron. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) G. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Second reading of ordinance authorizing Appalachian Power Company to expand the use of an existing easement across a well lot on Oriole Lane (Tax Map # 87.17-3-13) owned by the Board of Supervisors. (Paul M Mahoney, County Attorney) H. PUBLIC HEARINGS I. APPOINTMENTS 1. Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals 2. Highway and Transportation Safety Commission 3. League of Older Americans -Advisory Council 4. League of Older Americans -Advisory Board 5. Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission J. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Approval of minutes -December 7, 1999 2. Confirmation of committee appointment to the Library Board. 3. Request from Police Department to accept $500 donation from the 3 Loyal Order of Moose Lodge 284 for the DARE program. 4. Approval of resolutions of appreciation upon the retirements of: a. Beverly Tys-Berson, Youth Haven II b. Donald R. Carroll, Utility Department 5. Request from Libraries to accept $2,105 in donations and grants and appropriate to the Library budget. 6. Request from Social Services Department to accept and appropriate $257,000 for Child Day Care Block Grant. K. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS 1. Request to schedule a budget work session. L. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS M. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS N. REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Future School Capital Reserve 5. Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investments and Portfolio Policy as of February 29, 2000. O. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS P. WORK SESSIONS (4TH FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM) 1. Results of water and sewer rate studies and possible changes in rates for customers. (Gary Robertson, Utility Director) 2. Report on 1999 Economic Development efforts and discussion of 4 work plan for 2000. (David Porter, Economic Development Director) 3. Discussion of Fire and Rescue response and reaction times. (Rick Burch, Fire and Rescue Chief) 4. Consideration of a method. to fund improvements to Fire and Rescue response times, Fire and Rescue buildings and purchases of equipment by the use of fees for Emergency Medical Services. (Rick Burch, Fire and Rescue Chief) 5. Discussion on cluster housing amendments to the Zoning Ordinance. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) 6. Review of County Administration Goals established 1999 (Continued from February 8, 2000) Q. CLOSED MEETING pursuant to Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (5) discussion of a prospective business or industry where no previous announcement has been made. R. CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION S. ADJOURNMENT 5 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~' ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 14, 2000 AGENDA ITEM: Briefing on "March Through Time" Year 2000 Celebration COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~/~KIs Ji L~' ~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: March Through Time is the second of several events that Roanoke County is sponsoring throughout this year. The first, "Tons of Fun," was held on January 8 at Tanglewood Mall and was very successful. The food court had it biggest single day in it's history and the mall had one of its largest crowds. March Through Time will also be held at Tanglewood Mall on Friday, March 24 to Sunday, March 26. This event will highlight the history of the Roanoke Valley over the past 200 years. There will be exhibits from our history museums and other organizations. Local bands and dance groups will provide entertainment throughout the weekend. Two of the largest exhibits will be an antique car show and a U. S. military display. Additional information on this event will be provided to the Board members at the March 14 meeting. Respectfully Submitted by: Approved by: ~• .~'~-e-~i Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Elmer C. odge Clerk to the Board County Administrator ACTION VOTE No. Yes Abs Approved () Motion by: Church Denied () Johnson Received () McNamara- Referred () Minnix _ To () Nickens _ ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER~^ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 14, 2000 AGENDA ITEM: Annual Report from the Roanoke Valley Economic Development Partnership COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This time has been set aside for a presentation from the Roanoke Valley Economic Development Partnership on their annual report. Presenting the reportwill be Phil Sparks, Executive Director. Submitted by: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE No. Yes Abs Approved () Motion by: Church _ Denied () Johnson _ _ Received () McNamara- Referred () Minnix To () Nickens _ ~~, AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 14, 2000 ORDER 031400-1 SETTING THE TAX RATE ON REAL ESTATE SITUATE IN ROANOKE COUNTY FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 2000 BE IT ORDERED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the levy for the twelve-month period beginning January 1, 2000, and ending December 31, 2000, be, and hereby is, set for a tax rate of $1.13 per one hundred dollars of assessed valuation on all taxable real estate and mobile homes classified by §§ 58.1-3200, 58.1- 3201, and 58.1-3506.6 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, situate in Roanoke County. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the order setting the tax rate at $1.13, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: /'~ Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance W. Brent Robertson, Budget Manager John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Valuation Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue U:\WPDOCS\Agenda-20\mar20\3-14tax#l.wpd ACTION NO. iTF;M N UMBER '~" ~` ~`''" A'1' A REGULAR MEETING OF "1'HE BOARD OF SUPEKVISOKS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THFj. ROANOKF. COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CF.NTF.R MEETING DATE: March 14, 2000 AGENDA ITEM: Adoption of the Real Estate Tax Rate for the Calendar Year 2000. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~,~1 ~ __ CC~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Real Estate Ta_~: Rate for the twelve-month period beginning January 1, 2000, and ending December 31, 2000, was advertised on February 15, and 22, 2000 at $1.13 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation. The public hearing for citizen comment on the above advertised tax rate was held on February 29, 2000. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The proposed budget for fiscal year 2000-01 is predicated on the current Keal Estate 'l'ax Rate; therefore, staff recommends that the Real Estate 'l'ax Rate again be established at the rate of $1.13 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for the 2000 calendar year. Respectfully submitted, ~?U. Brent Robe son Budget Director ApprpDoved by, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Approved Dcnicd Received Referred '1'0 ACTION Motion by: VOTE No Yes Abs Church _ _ _ Johnson _ _ McNamara _ _ Minnix _ _ _ Nickens _ _ _ ~,~-! .ate AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 14, 2000 ORDER SETTING THE TAX RATE ON REAL ESTATE SITUATE IN ROANOKE COUNTY FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 2000 BE IT ORDERED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the levy for the twelve-month period beginning January 1, 2000, and ending December 31, 2000, be, and hereby is, set for a taY rate of $1.13 per one hundred dollars of assessed valuation on all taxable real estate and mobile homes classified by §§ 58.1-3200, 58.1-3201, and 58.1-3506.B of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, situate in Roanoke County. G:AFiNANCE\BUDGET\ADVERTIS\TXrate00.re.rs~.wpd r ~ - i~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 14, 2000 ORDER 031400-2 SETTING THE TAX LEVY ON ALL CLASSES OF PERSONAL PROPERTY SITUATE IN ROANOKE COUNTY FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 2000 BE IT ORDERED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the levy for the twelve-month period beginning January 1, 2000, and ending December 31, 2000, be, and hereby is, set for a tax rate of $3.50 per one hundred dollars of assessed valuation on all taxable, tangible personal property, excluding all those classes of household goods and personal effects as are defined in §§ 58.1-3504 and 58.1- 3505 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, but including the property separately classified by §§ 58.1-3500, 58.1-3501, 58.1-3502, 58.1-3506 in the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, of public service corporations based upon the assessed value thereof fixed by the State Corporation Commission and duly certified. 2. That there be, and hereby is, established as a separate class of personal property in Roanoke County those items of personal property set forth in § 58.1-3506 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and adopted by Ordinance No. 121592-11, and generally designated as Motor Vehicles for Disabled Veterans. 3. That the levy for the twelve-month period beginning January 1, 2000, and ending December 31, 2000, be, and hereby is, set at fifty (50%) percent of the tax rate established in paragraph 1 forthe taxable, tangible personal property as herein established as a separate classification for tax purposes and as more fully defined by § 58.1-3506 of 1 the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and generally designated as Motor Vehicles for Disabled Veterans. 4. That there be, and hereby is, established as a separate class of personal property in Roanoke County those items of personal property set forth in § 58.1-3507 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and generally designated as machinery and tools. 5. That the levy for the twelve-month period beginning January 1, 2000, and ending December 31, 2000, be, and hereby is, set for a tax rate of $3.00 per one hundred dollars of assessed valuation on all taxable, tangible personal property as herein established as a separate classification for tax purposes and as more fully defined by § 58.1-3507 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and generally designated as machinery and tools. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the order setting the personal property tax rate at $3.50 and machinery and tools tax rate at $3.00, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~ ~! Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance W. Brent Robertson, Budget Manager John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Valuation Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~'" l A7' A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CF,NTF.R MEETING DATE: March 14, 2000 AGENDA ITEM: Adoption of the Personal Property and Machinery and Tools Tax Rates for the Calendar Year 2000. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Personal Property Tax Rate for the twelve-month period beginning January 1, 2000, and ending December 31, 2000, was advertised on February 15, and 22, 2000 at $3.50 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation. The Machinery and "Tools Tax Rate was also advertised on the above dates at $3.00 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation. The public hearing for citizen comment on the above advertised tax rates was held on February 29, 2000. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The proposed budget for fiscal year 2000-01 is predicated on the current Personal Property and Machinery and Tools Tax Rates; therefore, staff recommends that the Personal Property Tax Rate again be established at the rate of $3.50 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation and the Machinery and Tools Tax Rate at $3.00 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation for the 2000 calendar year. Respectfully ~ubmitted, d(ft~ W. Brent Ro ertson Budget Director Approv d by, Elmer G Hodge County Administrator -~b ACTION Approved O Motion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) VOTE No Yes Abs Church _ _ _ Johnson _ _ McNamara _ _ _ Minnix _ _ _ Nickens a=lb AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 14, 2000 ORDER SETTING THE TAX LEVY ON ALL CLASSES OF PERSONAL PROPERTY SITUATE IN ROANOKE COUNTY FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 2000 BE IT ORDERED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: That the levy for the twelve-month period beginning January 1, 2000, and ending December 31, 2000, be, and hereby is, set for a tax rate of $3.50 per one hundred dollars of assessed valuation on all taxable, tangible personal property, excluding all those classes of household goods and personal effects as are defined in §§ 58.1-3504 and 58.1-3505 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, but including the property separately classified by §§ 58.1-3500, 58.1-3501, 58.1-3502, 58.1-3506 in the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, of public service corporations based upon the assessed value thereof fixed by the State Corporation Commission and duly certified. 2. That there be, and hereby is, established as a separate class of personal property in Roanoke County those items of personal property set forth in § 58.1-3506 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and adopted by Ordinance No. 121592-11, and generally designated as Motor Vehicles for Disabled Veterans. 3 . That the levy for the twelve-month period beginning January 1, 2000, and ending December 31, 2000, be, and hereby is, set at fifty (50%) percent of the tax rate established in paragraph 1 for the taxable, tangible personal property as herein established as a separate classification for tax purposes and as more fully defined by § 58.1-3506 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and generally designated as Motor Vehicles for Disabled Veterans. 4. That there be, and hereby is, established as a separate class of personal property in Roanoke County those items of personal property set forth in § 58.1-3507 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and generally designated as machinery and tools. 5. That the levy for thetwelve-month period beginning January 1, 2000, and ending December ~-- "" ` 31, 2000, be, and hereby is, set for a tax rate of $3.00 per one hundred dollars of assessed valuation on all taxable, tangible personal property as herein established as a separate classification for tax purposes and as more fully defined by § 58.1-3507 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and generally designated as machinery and tools. G:\FINANCE\BUDGET\ADVERTIS\txrate00.rso.wpd C-~. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON MARCH 14, 2000 RESOLUTION 031400-3 AUTHORIZING RENEWAL OF A LEASE OF REAL ESTATE FOR A PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO TOWER SITE ON TINKER MOUNTAIN WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors adopted Ordinance 062497-6 authorizing the execution of a lease with Lee C. Hartman, Jr., for property situated on Tinker Mountain approximately 3.7 miles north of Roanoke, Virginia, (Lat 37 22 23 N, Long 79 55 40W) in Botetourt County, Virginia, which consists of a parcel of land described on Exhibit A attached hereto, together with anon-exclusive right of access to and from the premises by way of the private road connecting with Frontage Road, for a public safety radio tower for an initial term of three years commencing July 1, 1997, and ending on June 30, 2000, with an option to renew the lease upon the same terms and conditions for an additional successive two year term by providing written notice to Lee C. Hartman, Jr. on or before March 31, 2000, and WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the County Charter requires the adoption of an ordinance to acquire an interest in real estate; however, after such ordinance shall have taken effect, all subsequent proceedings incidental thereto may be taken by resolution of the Board, and WHEREAS, the County desires to exercise its option to renew the lease for an additional two year term ending June 30, 2002, for an annual rental of $2,600.00 payable on the first day of each yearly period during the term of the lease. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County that the County Administrator, or an Assistant County Administrator, is hereby authorized to execute the necessary documents for renewal of the lease for a parcel of land described on Exhibit A from Lee C. Hartman, Jr., for a public safety radio tower site through the period ending June 30, 2002, in accordance with the same terms and conditions asset out in the original lease dated May 22, 1997, and upon form approved by the County s Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: /~- Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Joseph B. Obenshain, Senior Assistant County Attorney John D. Willey, Property Manager Elaine Carver, Director, General Services 2 !• a a Q~ ~Q OZ . ~, W f ~~ ~ ~~ a' • W Q J N ~, _ .~ .~ ~J 00 ~~~~~~~~ 1~~ ~ Q ~ ~ W L~ Q ~ i J ~ v ~~ ^ ` ss/ .` Q ~,'~ ^N .. Q~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~~ ~ ~ J ~M ~ ~, v )) ~ ;~Q 0 ~h~;, ~ ~ i 0 3 Q N ~ ~9 ~ <7 OQ w ._ ~°°°~ ~ ~ ~. •. u ~ ~ ~ ~Y~~ ~~ `~ ~_ _ ~. O Cr ~ }~' ~oo~ ~ ~ ~ 4i ~~~~ W W W4~i 0000 H H CA H ,oa t '~W Z O r ~1• .~ . 8 ~' m Z ~ ~ ~ F- 4W ~ W u4 J W D ~ 3 Z ~ tJ W ti vat Y .ZI O Z_ ~~ Z O ~' ~ ~ ~ ./ .02. .8~ _ ~ ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~~"' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIItGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 14, 2000 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution Authorizing Renewal of a Lease of Real Estate for a Public Safety Radio Tower Site on Tinker Mountain COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The 911 tower site located on Tinker Mountain is an essential part of the emergency coverage for the Roanoke County Police and Fire and Rescue. To provide uninterrupted emergency response coverage, this site must be retained. This site is held through a lease with Lee C. Hartman, Jr., the property owner, that commenced on July 1, 1997. The present lease had a payment of $2,300.00 per year for each of the past three years. The lease provides an option for renewal for an additional successive two-year term at an annual rental of $2,600.00 per year, and requires notification to the owner of the County's intention to exercise this option to renew on or before March 31, 2000. ALTERNATIVES: (1) Authorize approval of the attached resolution to exercise the option to renew the current lease with Lee C. Hartman, Jr., for an additional successive two-year term, ending June 30, 2002, at an annual rental of $2,600.00. (2) Do not exercise the option for renewal and allow the lease to expire. (3) Direct staff to negotiate a new lease agreement. ~~ FISCAL IMPACT: The lease provides for an annual rental of $2,600.00 for an additional successive two-year term. Funds are available and are to be paid from the E911 account. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative (1). Respectfully submitted, Jos h B. ~benshain Se i r Assistant County Attorney Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Church Johnson McNamara Minnix _ _ Nickens g:~attaney~jbo~agenda~iinkertntlease.rpt ~f AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIItGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON MARCH 14, 2000 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING RENEWAL OF A LEASE OF REAL ESTATE FOR A PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO TOWER SITE ON TINKER MOUNTAIN WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors adopted Ordinance 062497-6 authorizing the execution of a lease with Lee C. Hartman, Jr., for property situated on Tinker Mountain approximately 3.7 miles north ofRoanoke, Virginia, (Lat 37 22 23 N, Long 79 55 40W) in Botetourt County, Virginia, which consists of a parcel of land described on Exhibit A attached hereto, together with anon-exclusive right of access to and from the premises by way of the private road connecting with Frontage Road, for a public safety radio tower for an initial term ofthree years commencing July 1, 1997, and ending on June 30, 2000, with an option to renew the lease upon the same terms and conditions for an additional successive two year term by providing written notice to Lee C. Hartman, Jr. on or before March 31, 2000, and WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the County Charter requires the adoption of an ordinance to acquire an interest in real estate; however, after such ordinance shall have taken effect, all subsequent proceedings incidental thereto may be taken by resolution of the Board, and WHEREAS, the County desires to exercise its option to renew the lease for an additional two year term ending June 30, 2002, for an annual rental of $2,600.00 payable on the first day of each yearly period during the term of the lease. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors ofRoanoke County that the County Administrator, or an Assistant County Administrator, is hereby authorized to execute the necessary documents for renewal of the lease for a parcel of land described on Exhibit A from Lee C. Hartman, Jr., for a public safety radio tower site through the period ending June 30, 2002, in accordance with the same terms and conditions as set out in the original lease dated May 22, 1997, and upon form approved by the County Attorney. g:/attorney/jbo/agenda/tinkermtlease.res Q ~~ Q~ ~~ O~ W ~~ ~ o°) ti ~I ,~ .' ., W • Q J N ~•~` ~~ - z 0 3 Q J N ~ ~9 W OO W ... .~~~ ~: W a7 W ~ Z ~ ~- ~ F"" W Z a ° • F ; ~ dJ O ~ ~ ~ ~ u Z ~ tJ W ~ ~ oa= . ~ ~w~ Y J .Z. o Z O J 1 ~ o 2 ~- . . ~J 00 ~~Q5?~~` :~5 ~ Q W ~ W i• Q to . ~ ss u ~~ .Q LY'~ O•~ - - . \ ~ \ ~ a ~,~ ~ ~ ~ it ~ W ~ _>>' O `~ o~oJ,Q F,h~ ~~ ~ Z ~ 0 „i i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~. u Z=~~ ~ ~ °~°'_ 33 ~h .J ~_ _ ~s _ ~,. ~ ~~~ ~o3vi ~,aoF ~ ~~W ~~~~ W~itWW I ~0~0 H H Pa H ui / Z +~/ i i - i• .. ~ A-031400-4 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 14, 2000 AGENDA ITEM: Authorization to give notice to the Commonwealth Transportation Board to proceed with the abandonment of a 30' x 118' prescriptive right-of-way, generally located 250' from the intersection of Mountain View Road and Laurel Glen Road in the Vinton Magisterial District. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND• Roanoke County has received a request from Wolf Creek Inc. to abandon a 30' x 118' prescriptive right-of-way adjacent to the Beech Cove section of the Wolf Creek PRD. A prescriptive public right-of-way is one acquired for public use by reason of continuous, open, uninterrupted usage for a period of twenty years or more. This right-of-way is located off of Laurel Glen Road near the intersection Mountain View Road. If interest in this prescriptive right-of-way is abandoned by Roanoke County, and the Commonwealth of Virginia, the land area associated with this right-of-way will be available to the applicant for use as part of the Wolf Creek PRD development. Title 33.1-151 of the Code of Virginia, 1950 as amended, requires the governing body of a county to give notice of intention to abandon any such road to the Commonwealth Transportation Board (CTB). Once notice of intent to abandon this right-of-way is given to the CTB, county staff will be able to move forward with the necessary postings and advertisements for abandonment. ~r~ 2 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: County staff is requesting that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors give notice of its intention to abandon this 30' x 118' prescriptive right-of-way, and authorize county staff to proceed with the requisite notices under Title 33.1-151, Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. Respectfully Submitted, Approved, ~~ , ~- ~ ~- ~ , Terrance L Harr ngton, AICP Elmer C. Hodge Departure of Community Development County Administrator ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens to approve Church _ x _ Denied () Johnson _ x _ Received () McNamara- x Referred () Minnix _ x To () Nickens _ x cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, County Planner Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Item No. ~~ L AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ROANOKE COUNTY, VIlZGINIA MEETING DATE: March 14, 2000 AGENDA ITEM: First Reading of Ordinance Extending the Current Franchise Agreement with Adelphia (Salem) Cable for Ninety Days COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: In 1994, the County entered into an extension of its franchise agreement with Adelphia (formerly known as Salem) Cable, in order to make the term coincide with Adelphia's agreement with the City of Salem. The franchise agreements both terminated this year, allowing Roanoke County and Salem to negotiate a new agreement together, as the County, the City of Roanoke and the Town of Vinton have done with Cox Communications. On September 28, 1999, the Board of Supervisors appointed a negotiating team to work with the County Attorney's office and the City of Salem in reaching a new franchise agreement. This negotiating team has met to discuss those issues which should be addressed in the new agreement, but neither the City of Salem nor Roanoke County has reached final agreement with Adelphia. Therefore, since the current agreement with the previous ninety day extension granted on January 11, 2000, is set to expire on April 1, 2000, an extension must be approved so that negotiations can be successfully completed. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The cable franchise in the Glenvar and Masons Cove area of Roanoke County was originally held by Salem Cable, which was owned by Booth Communications. Booth was purchased by the Adelphia system in April, 1997, and this Board approved a transfer of the franchise to Adelphia at that time. The Board of Supervisors has appointed a cable television committee to deal with franchise issues with Adelphia. The committee consists of a representative from the Roanoke Valley Cable Television Committee (Dr. Harry Nickens), the supervisor from the Catawba district (Butch Church), a representative from the school system (Dr. Jane James), the staff person overseeing the cable television operations (Anne Marie Green) and a citizen representative (James Dickey). During the negotiations for the extension of the franchise, Booth provided a capital grant of $40,000 to the County, free basic cable service to government and school facilities, and an interconnect with the Cox system to allow RVTV to cablecast on Channel 3 in the Booth system. Both Booth and Adelphia have provided a high quality of service to Roanoke County residents, and staffhas received very few complaints about the cable provider. The cost to residents is comparable to that of Cox F~i customers, and the channel selection is almost identical. Adelphia is currently working on expanding its service into the field of Internet service, which should be available to its customers in the near future. The franchise agreements in both localities were to expire on October 4, 1999, and were extended for ninety days until January 2, 2000, and again for another ninety days until April 1, 2000. While there have been preliminary staffdiscussionshetween the local governments and with Adelphia, and a meeting of the negotiating committee, formal negotiations have not been completed An ordinance approving the extension of the franchise agreement is attached to this Board Report. FISCAL IMPACT: None anticipated at this time. The County may receive a capital grant from Adelphia, which will provide funding for cable or Internet related equipment. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the attached ordinance, extending the current franchise agreement by ninety days. Respectfully submitted, Assistant County Attorney Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION No Yes Abs Approved Denied Received Referred to ()Motion by: () () Church _ _ Johnson McNamara Minnix Nickens 2 ~. 1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 14, 2000 ORDINANCE EXTENDING THE FRANCHISE OF BLACKSBURG/SALEM CABLEVISION ,INC. DB/A SALEM CABLE TV TO OPERATE A CABLE TELEVISION SYSTEM IN ROANOKE COUNTY FOR A PERIOD OF 90 DAYS WHEREAS, Blacksburg/Salem Cablevision, d/b/a Salem Cable TV, a wholly owned subsidiary ofAdelphia Communications Corporation, currently holds a franchise granted by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, to operate a cable television system within portions of Roanoke County which franchise expired on October 4, 1999, and was extended for a period of ninety (90) days by action of the Board of Supervisors on September 28, 1999, and an additional ninety (90) days by action of the Board on January 11, 2000; and WHEREAS, negotiations are currently under way between Blacksburg/Salem Cablevision, Inc., d/b/a Salem Cable TV, and the County of Roanoke for the renewal of this franchise agreement, which negotiations may not be concluded sufficiently prior to such date to permit adoption of a new franchise agreement by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke prior to the expiration of the current franchise agreement on or about April 1, 2000; and WHEREAS, Blacksburg/Salem Cablevision, Inc., d/b/a Salem Cable TV, is prohibited by federal law from operating a cable television system within any jurisdiction without a franchise agreement or extension as defined by federal law; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on March 14, 2000, and the second reading of this ordinance was held on March 28, 2000. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That in order to permit Blacksburg/Salem Cablevision, Inc., d/b/a Salem Cable TV, to continue to operate a cable television franchise within the territorial limits of Roanoke County, Virginia, after April 1, 2000, and to prevent any interruption of cable television services to customers of Salem Cable TV, the franchise of Blacksburg/ Salem Cablevision, Inc., d/b/a Salem Cable TV, for the operation of a cable television system within Roanoke County, Virginia, is hereby extended for a period of ninety (90) days beginning at 12:00, midnight, on April 1, 2000, under the same terms and conditions as contained in the existing franchise agreement originally granted by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, to Booth American Company, d/b/a Salem Cable TV, in October, 1994, and subsequently transferred to Blacksburg/Salem Cablevision, Inc., d/b/a Salem Cable TV, as of April, 1997. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from its passage. G:\ATTORNEYUBO\CABLETV\Salemadelpha.renew\SALEMEX'r.march 2 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO . ~~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 14, 2000 AGENDA ITEM: First Reading of an ordinance to vacate a 10' private greenspace easement located between lots 3 and 4 in Section 3 of the Lilies of the Garden, located in the Cave Spring Magisterial District upon the petition of Strauss Construction Corporation. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' ~-~-'~` Section 3, Lilies of the Garden was platted creating a 10' private greenspace easement between lots 3 and 4. This is a private greenspace easement for the benefit of the homeowner's association. Strauss Construction Corporation, and the Gardens of Cotton Hill Homeowners Association have requested that this greenspace easement be vacated. Lots within this section of the subdivision have been sold. State law provides that when lots within a subdivision have been sold, easements within a subdivision may be vacated by action of the Board of Supervisors. Staff has evaluated this vacation request. The greenspace easements within the subdivision were originally created to allow residents pedestrian access to the Blue Ridge Parkway. This easement, however, only provides access to Cotton Hill Road, and provides no direct access to the Parkway. Fa 2 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: 1. That the Board of Supervisors hold first reading of an ordinance vacating a 10' wide greenspace easement between Lots 3 and 4 Lilies of the Garden. Staff also recommends that public hearing and second reading of this ordinance be scheduled for March 28, 2000 Respectfully Submitted, Terrance L. ar ton, AICP Department f C munity Development Approved, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Vote No Yes Abs Church Johnson McNamara Minnix Nickens !~'" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 14, 2000 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE VACATION OF A 10' GREENSPACE EASEMENT LOCATED ALONG THE BOUNDARY LINE BETWEEN LOTS 3 AND 4 IN SECTION 3 OF THE LILIES OF THE GARDEN, IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT UPON THE PETITION OF STRAUSS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION WHEREAS, by subdivision plat entitled `PLAT OF SUBDIVISION FOR STRAUSS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION CREATINGHEREON SECTIONNO. 3, "LILIES OF THE GARDENS" BEING A SUBDIVISION OF TAX #96.02-1-45.1,' dated March 27, 1996, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Plat Book 18, page 143, aten-foot (10') private greenspace easement, extending from Cotton Hill Road to Chagall Drive, was created and shown along the boundary line between Lot 3 (Tax Map #96.07-8-3) and Lot 4 (Tax Map #96.07-8-4); and, WHEREAS, the Petitioners, Strauss Construction Corporation and the Gardens of Cotton Hill Homeowners Association, have requested that said 10' greenspace easement be vacated pursuant to § 15.2-2272.2 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended); and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by § 15.2-2204 ofthe Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), and the first reading of this ordinance was held on March 14, 2000; the public hearing and second reading of this ordinance was held on March 28, 2000. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the "10' GREENSPACE EASEMENT" extending from Cotton Hill Road to Chagall Drive along the boundary line between Lot 3 (Tax Map #96.07-8-3) and Lot 4 (Tax Map #96.07-8-4), as created and shown on the plat entitled `PLAT OF SUBDIVISION FOR STRAUSS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION CREATINGHEREON SECTION N0.3, "LILIES OF THE GARDENS" BEING A SUBDIVISION OF TAX #96.02-1-45.1,' dated March 27, 1996, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 18, page 143, and being designated and shown as "10' GREENSPACE EASEMENT TO BE VACATED" on Exhibit A attached hereto, be, and f- ~ hereby is, vacated pursuant to § 15.2-2272 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), subject to the conditions contained herein. 2. That all costs and expenses associated herewith, including but not limited to publication, survey and recordation costs, shall be the responsibility of the Petitioners. 3. That the County Administrator, or an Assistant County Administrator, is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish the provisions of this ordinance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 4. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption, and a certified copy hereof shall be recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in accordance with § 15.2-2272.2 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended). 2 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~""` AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 14, 2000 AGENDA ITEM: First Reading of an Ordinance to Vacate an 81 square foot section of Fairway View Trail in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District upon the Petition George Baron COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS: I~~~,ry~s~ BACKGROUND' Mr. George Baron has requested that an 81 square foot section of Fairway View Trail be vacated. The petitioner is a property owner adjacent to the right-of-way. If vacated by Roanoke County, the right-of-way will be combined with the adjacent property owned by Mr. Baron. The purpose of this vacation is to eliminate a setback violation associated with a house that has been constructed on this property. Staff has reviewed this request and has contacted all agencies that have or of-way. As a result appropriate to vacate utility easement for STAFF RECOMMENDATION: may have a future interest in this right- of this review, staff believes it is the right-of-way, yet reserve a public public use. Staff recommends as follows: 1. That the Board of Supervisors hold first reading of an ordinance vacating an 81 square foot section of Fairway View Trail, with the reservation of a public utility easement for public use. Staff also recommends that public hearing and second reading of this ordinance be scheduled for March 28, 2000 ~. 2 Respectfully Submitted, Approved, (,~~/ Terrance Har ngton, AICP Elmer C. Hodge Departure of Community Development County Administrator Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Vote No Yes Abs Church Johnson McNamara Minnix Nickens ~~'~ V~` Q ~ 2 ~~~ o~~, II ~\ ~ ~^~ Q ~O ~__ ~ ~ ^~~ O W a N~ V ~~ti$4h O II II ~ v t7 Q Q~ ~~ m ry~ ~o. ~~ h1P W W ~~O\ ~~F Q0 = m ~ j ~ ~^ ~o vo H W~ ~m ~~ ~~ ~~ ^~ ~V i W ~~ W 'I t~ I ^ ~~_~ NWN ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ wpm ~~h y~~ ~~~ ~~ m ~` F N ~~ ~d ~ cp O N ~~ / `~ o / ~V k h i ~C IP N v~ ~~ ~ ~~ W 1 0 ~~" I W ~~ ~O /`~1V /~I~ / ~~ / ~' ~l Q -~ o~ ~ / / ~ I I :'~~~ ~ ~os ti ~1 U I ~`~ 1 /-.`}~~ / ~~~, ~ ,~,~ a~ ~~ t~ .esa m I- °' ~ ~ ~ w m ~ G~ o in ~ ~ a oz w o v ~ aW o ~ a ~ N Z c~ ~ ~ ~ a J aW 5 FW-as Q ~ p Q ~ F- ~ ~ F r ~ F- ~ a ~C vo_ r U F J Q ~ ~ ~ Q~ ~ fOA ~' u I-~ ) ~ 0 0 ~ ~ NBC a d a Z ~, ~ m Q m a ~_ Y ° W a C o Q p U ~ Q II N~ li ~ ~ ~ w Q ~ 3 I Q ~ ~Q ~ _~ W ~O ~ ~ U W i; Q = Z ~o~ VWo V °~ ~~Q oz o~v ~o ,~o zw hem ms ~~ W~ ~~~ ~~ SSQ o0 ~W ~_ ~3~ ~~i e~~' ~`~~~WW ti~~~W~ ~ Q~~W h~nQ~~ W c., ~vQ~~~ ~ j~ ~ti~ y oQ~~~W W ^~~m~'W ~ ~QO~~z N '`~ ~'" "" F3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 14, 2000 ORDINANCE VACATING AND CLOSING AS PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY AN 81 SQUARE-FOOT PORTION OF FAIRWAY VIEW TRAIL ADJACENT TO LOT 30, BLOCK 2, SECTION 2, IN FAIRWAY FOREST ESTATES SUBDIVISION RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 10, PAGE 122. WHEREAS, the Petitioner, Baron Enterprises of Virginia, Inc., is the owner ofLot 30, Block 2, Section 2, Fairway Forest Estates, of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County in Plat Book 10, Page 122; and, WHEREAS, the Petitioner has requested that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, vacate and close as public right-of--way an 81 square-foot portion ofFairway Forest Estates, adjacent to Lot 30, Block 2, said right-of--way having been dedicated to the public on the "PLAT OF TOTAL AREA = 32.92 Ac., SECTION NO. 2, FAIRWAY FOREST ESTATES', in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District of Roanoke County, Virginia, and recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 122; and, WHEREAS, § 15.2-2272.2 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended) requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by § 15.2-2204 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), and the first reading of this ordinance was held on March 14, 2000; the public hearing and second reading of this ordinance was held on March 28, 2000. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the portion of public right-of--way, situate in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District of Roanoke County, shown and hatched on Exhibit A attached hereto, entitled `PLAT SHOWING PORTION OF FAIIZWAY VIEW TRAIL TO BE VACATED AND COMBINED WITH LOT 30, "FAIRWAY FOREST ESTATES" (P.B. 10, PG. 122)', being 81 square feet of Fairway View Trail adjacent to Lot 30, Block 2, Section 2, Fairway Forest Estates, dedicated on the subdivision plat of Section No. 2, Fairway Forest Estates, recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 10, page 122, be, and hereby is, vacated and closed pursuant to Section 15.2-2272 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), subject to the following conditions: ~~ a. That fee simple title to the subject right-of--way shall vest in the owner of the abutting property within the subdivision as provided in § 15.2-2274 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), subject to the condition that the vacated area of land shall be added and combined, by deed or by plat, to said abutting property, in compliance with the Roanoke County Subdivision and Zoning Ordinances, and other applicable laws and regulations. b. That the entire 81 square-foot area vacated and closed is hereby reserved and retained as a public utility easement, together with the right of any public utility company to provide maintenance to any existing or future facilities located within the vacated area, and together with the nght of ingress and egress thereto from the public road.. c. That all costs and expenses associated herewith, including but not limited to publication, survey and recordation costs, shall be the responsibility of Baron Enterprises of Virginia, Inc. 2. That the County Administrator, an Assistant County Administrator, or any County Subdivision Agent is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as maybe necessary to accomplish the provisions of this ordinance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 3. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption, and a certified copy ofthis ordinance shall be recorded in the Clerk's Office ofthe Circuit Court ofRoanoke County, Virginia, in accordance with §15.2-2272.2 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended). 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 14, 2000 ORDINANCE 031400-5 AUTHORIZING APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY TO EXPAND THE USE OF AN EXISTING EASEMENT ACROSS A WELL LOT ON ORIOLE LANE (TAX MAP NO. 87.17-3-13) OWNED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY (CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT) WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County is the owner of a well lot on Oriole Lane, Tax Map No. 87.17-3-13; and, WHEREAS, a portion of an existing easement granted to Appalachian Electric Power Co. (APCO) crosses the County's well lot on Oriole Lane; and, WHEREAS, Appalachian Power Company (APCO) has requested authorization to expand the use of the existing easement across the well lot on Oriole Lane to allow access to a telecommunications antenna of Triton PCS Property Company, L.L.C., to be located on an existing transmission line tower. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance. A first reading of this ordinance was held on February 29, 2000; and a second reading was held on March 14, 2000. 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the interests in real estate to be conveyed are hereby declared to be surplus, and are hereby made available for other public uses by conveyance to Appalachian Power Company for access to a telecommunications antenna to be installed on an existing electric transmission line tower. 3. That the conveyance of the expanded use of the right-of-way for access to a telecommunications antenna to Appalachian Power Company as shown on Exhibit A (attached) for the sum of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) is hereby authorized. 4. That the County Administrator or an Assistant County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such further actions as may be necessary to accomplish this conveyance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 5. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. On motion of Supervisor McNamara to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: `y'lZc.~~ ~. Mary H. A en, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Terry Harrington, County Planner John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Valuation 2 ERT1CAt ANtENNA ~ suPPOars I7YPICAU ~~o-4 o NOR12 ,;~ SIIPPC RAIL t - ~ ~ r S•-0• } S•-0• t PLAN VIEW NEA tr-0• AIDE (NOT ALIGNED TO TRUE DOUBtE SAINO O+tE .... MOT TO SGIE _...._ ..................._........_..__..... - ~ ... .+ Ez ISTINO APCO TRANSYI$S1CN,~=..-_ _ _ «• ~ ~ .... b TO_iEtEA.02054-8: '15-25.CN ~, ''1. TRITON ~ _.. _._ _ ._..._.,____'__^. ._..... _. EXISrINO~ ~~ ~ ~'~ SERVICE .,,~ '. . __.. - . Y((,ETAi ION '~ i \ .~~. ~ 9ACItBO+A~ ~~ ~ ~.~ ~ ~ 3 _ . • ... .. _... +r ....._ . . ... ! 1 ; -~~ ~ - EEEvarEO stwPaRr -- .. .... ~~ I. ~ EBRk -~-~- ,,,.•+~ •-EYIS7ING APC ~• I~ `i p,; _. ~~ ~' "0 ., UTItIT't. P.OI.E _.... ~~ .. .... _.. PROPOSED ~~ n'ti~.' _. ~ _ ..... FfAT~O1iN itTrER. ESRNOEO ~ . ~ - ~ . . T• AIDE 1~I~ iF 1RITp/ ~ _ _ ~~ PEOESTR IAN ,~ I'"~I~ `..S' ^ 0' TRITON TO1AIf0lL Pt96OlY TO OE-', / AAtzfAY ~ ~~I,' COND. P... BTS -"'~ . f '..,.~!!BIBET ...__.____ _ _.__~.;....._}s=.+eorESTatctlx;.-' ~.:-;.-- _. ... •' ~ ... -.. j~.~. ,w : -.... r l_. III M~ii. ..ry'".z` ...... ' ~ .___....._.._ .. ~~`^' OvERNEAO I lNE \~ +i .. . y _...... '. _ _ Tif _ .. FORTtgA `~ ' ~ ~ T OAEA ~~ ..-~~.;" -' .• •. .%^ ~ ...._....~. „~ ... 1 Jam'"' ....-~ i~~ .4, .. .~ _%" \ PROPOSE ,n •..:......._..........._.__.. ~ ~ -` , AIRS A ~ ~ tE AITN •• ~ ,_.....,,._.- " ~ ~,,, ^I2• ; jai .._\' \ ___.__ - J_ t....__.... _ .: :, ~... ' LARALER iOR ._..~ ..~ ---BI7ADING~OLST-IRfAY ~ A _-.. r.-.".~ :• ..._ .~ _~..~' t ...__.. ANO IAIRAAY. ^__ _ _ _.. _.. _- _.- . _..._..___... 1 --' _. - `. . ~OIAIN tlka FENCE .,=;II ~'~ ~~`. `• \ F .- _J ~ ~ a _- ~t..,..'µ. , •. __ _....__._.__._.__ Q~ ..... ~\ .. `. ~• 1` ._ .... ~• ~ ~ ..... PRl]POSED ~ to'=2o' PlI1t ING AREA ii i\ T PROPERTY ElNE i "'~7i6~~ i /' Saar. ~~~~y~~r ~ '%'~irr~j~~xp ~ ~~ /. ry~ iiA. ~ . ~1; : •..x. ~ ~ tD• ts• ExISTINO ASE T ~ -"~ ' ACCESS" ~~~+„ ~ / ;~ .. :'~- `\ ~ cu -0E-SAC ' "~ NM(IRIM . [xISf INO aPCO/ O• UiltltY PQE SITE PLAN 2'70 • sS41-AaD1 3cT5 .t SLUE: r • ~' ~~~~//// t50' \dqn sce suncom 990fa5.dgn Mar. 02. 2000 09: 28:56;printhaf ~'. ACTION NO. //!!''~~ ITEM NO. V~- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 14, 2000 AGENDA ITEM: Second reading of an ordinance authorizing Appalachian Power Company to expand the use of an existing easement across a well lot on Oriole Lane (Tax Map Number 87.17-3-13) owned by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County (Cave Spring Magisterial District) COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Appalachian Power Company (APCO) has requested authorization to expand the use of an existing easement across a well lot on Oriole Lane to allow access to a telecommunications antenna to be located on an existing transmission line tower (shown cross-hatched on Exhibit A attached). County staffhas reviewed the request and has determined that it does not interfere with the County's use of the property. This easement will include an additional area for a graveled parking space for one vehicle and the construction of steps up an embankment to the existing tower. FISCAL IMPACTS: Consideration for the proposed easement is the sum of $100.00. These proceeds will be deposited in the Water Operations Account - Lease/Rent Easements. ALTERNATIVES: (1) Adopt the proposed ordinance authorizing the County Administrator to execute the necessary documents for expansion of the use of the existing easement to Appalachian Power Company. (2) Decline to authorize donation or conveyance of the easement. ~. ~ espectfully submitted, 1' ~'~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Approved Denied Received Referred to ~) ~) ~) Motion by: ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Church Johnson McNamara _ Minnix _ _ Nickens g:/attorney/vlh/agenda/APCO.OrioleLane.~pt AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,VIRGII~TIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMII~TISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 14, 2000 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY TO EXPAND THE USE OF AN EXISTING EASEMENT ACROSS A WELL LOT ON ORIOLE LANE (TAX MAP NO. 87.17-3-13) OWNED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY (CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT) WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors ofRoanoke County is the owner of a well lot on Oriole Lane, Tax Map No. 87.17-3-13; and, WHEREAS, a portion of an existing easement granted to Appalachian Electric Power Co. (APCO) crosses the County's well lot on Oriole Lane; and, WHEREAS, Appalachian Power Company (APCO) has requested authorization to expand the use of the existing easement across the well lot on Oriole Lane to allow access to a telecommunications antenna of Triton PCS Property Company, L.L.C., to be located on an existing transmission line tower. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance. A first reading of this ordinance was held on February 29, 2000; and a second reading was held on March 14, 2000. 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter ofRoanoke County, the interests in real estate to be conveyed are hereby declared to be surplus, and are hereby made available for other public uses by conveyance to Appalachian Power Company for access to a telecommunications antenna to be installed on an existing electric transmission line tower. 3. That the conveyance of the expanded use of the right-of--way for access to a telecommunications antenna to Appalachian Power Company as shown on Exhibit A (attached) for the sum of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) is hereby authorized. G- I 4. That the County Administrator or an Assistant County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such further actions as may be necessary to accomplish this conveyance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 5. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. g:~attortteyVvh~agendaWPCO.OrioleLane.ord 2 .- .~~ ~Y~-rF'~' SCHEDULE TSI V ~ - p0-t-133A CABLE SC HEDIRE cccc. SITE xUAeER: TYPE OF COAx RAD ESI. T-PE ANTENNI BEAM AL DOMN ANTENNA ANTENNA ANTENNA SIZE CENTER LENGTH COLOR DIRECTI IIIDTH TIIT NLR•6ER POSITION SECTOR 1 S/8" tt~ 0' 130.0' GREEN RECEIVE 90' 0' RV90-1T-020P t-AUrx01 30` • EMS EMS t 5/8" . 11<.0' 130.0' GREEN-GREEN TRANSMIT 90' 0• Rv90-I7-020P 2-AllrxOl 30 ' EMS t S/8" 111.0' 130.0' SLOE RECEIVE 90' 0' RV90-tT-000P t-0(2rx0t 150 • EMS t 5/B" 111.0' 130.0' BLUE -BLUE tRANSuIt 90' RV90-t7-000P D• 2-B12rx01 150 ' EMS t 5/8" It1.0' 130.0' tmlTE RECEIVE 90' Rv90-17-000P 0' 1-Ct 3rx01 2T0 B" 111 0' 130 0' 1MITE-IIHI TE TRANSMIT 90• 0' RV90-t7-000P 1-C13tx01 270• EMS t S/ . . untcC_ t. MECHANICAL D(tn+TILT >tlLl B E iURNISHEO LITER AS SYSTEM IS DEVELOPED. 2. ALL CHANGES 10 THIS SCHtUUIt ]nwLU tlc errnu.w o. . }. FIELD VERIFV FOR EXACT LENGTH BEFORE CABLES ARE CU1. DOIIBtE SING GATE ~® L >>a o ERTICAL ANTENNA SUPPORTS ! ivP 1 CAU HORIZ $UPPC RAIL S ~ v PLAN VIEW tNOT ALIGNED TO TRUE -- N07 TO SCALE - _..._.. _ _.. ^- J .. .. _. .. - ~ - r Ex 1ST IRG APCO TRANSL15SlON - ~~--~- ~-- ~~" ~ -' _.. o .._.fOvER.F..O2054-8" IS-15.Cx t _. _ . __ TRITON _. _. ~ ___... .__ _._ Ex I511NG~ ..-~~ SERVICE -' j ~i.:.i... . ~ -'_ vECEtATION "~ i ~ RACKBWRO ~ T/ l _r~ _.__.- ~~... _. ~~ _.ElEV~TEO._.__ ,, ~~---c= _...._ I '' ~ ELEVATED SUPPORT ------ .'" INS: - ERRT -- EYTSi ING APC i I ' ~ ~ ~ -0 UTILITV_2Q.E III .r"v. ,. _ _.. +TNQ-5003 ~,• PROPOSED I II, _ _. _ _. .. _. __ _ _. _. ~~ 3 -1 OE I ~ TRITON ~ ~ _ ~ ~ iOITV(Ttx TONER. EifExOED `~ ~~ ~. TxROUGN tRANSNlSS1Ol- _ PEDESTRIAN III' -~..5 x B' TRt TON _ ~ ., ~ -~~~~ VALKVAT '. ,. III~'i ,rY'"' ~ - TOTER.. iRIfOl.PttTFTA1N TD C•C •\...` _~ II CONC. P BTS _,~.. .. .TS:~_ABOVC-STAi IC IINE$ _.... ;~II~ // .. t --EZT3tlNG I ~IIIV~II I i _~./" , _ _ _.. _. OvERREAO LINE llll~ ~ ._ __ .. i~,NR7A - ''- \ _ ~.., _ _ i I' R ~_ __ PROPOSE I ., ~ m .-_. - ._.._ _ ~ ,y ~ _ - Sj hr:12s'S1 A r l~ °CONST iE 71 TM + ___---., ...-- ~ ~ _ .. ''~~.. \ ~'~. ~ _ _ t - _ \. 1 /// I 1 \~ i r PROPERTY LINE ExISt ING t0' IS' ASE NT // /r _.' ~~~-\ ACCESS ..~"`D,. ~:~~ ~ ~,~T // j, / ` - `-ORI0.E LINE / '~ C0. -Of-SAC / ~ INORTH 1 "'S""`~`°~ SITE PLAN 27D•{-~ )°• utlllfT P0.E sNE-10]! 3675 J $CAIE: 1'=5' 150' RAIL \ \ T g:\tlgn\sce\suncom\990145.Ogn rear. printhaf .., . ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER ~ f'""'~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 14, 2000 SUBJECT: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1. BUILDING CODE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS The four-year term of Thomas A. Darnall, Architect, will expire January 22, 2000. The four-year term of Richard E. Evans will expire April 13, 2000 and the four-year term of Buford E. Butts will expire April 27, 2000. These appointments should represent different occupational or professional fields and at least one member should be a licensed professional engineer or architect and one should be a builder. 2. HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION SAFETY COMMISSION The four year term of Jay E. Gaylor, Legal Representative, James M. Martin, Senior Representative, and one-yea: term of a youth representative who must be attending a Roanoke County high school. Mr. James Martin has notified the Clerk's Office that he does not wish to serve another term. 3. LEAGUE OF OLDER AMERICANS -ADVISORY COUNCIL The one-year term of Thelma Ihrig expired March 31, 1999. She has indicated that she does not wish to serve another term at this time. 4. LEAGUE OF OLDER AMERICANS -ADVISORY BOARD 1 ~~ ~~ The three-year term of Elizabeth Bogle will expire March 31, 2000. The Advisory Board member is appointed by the League of Older Americans but must be ratified by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. 5. ROANOKE VALLEY GREENWAY COMMISSION The three-year term of Charles Blankenship will expire April 8, 2000 SUBMITTED BY: ~- Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board ACTION APPROVED BY: ~w Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator VOTE No. Yes Abs Approved () Motion by: Church Denied () Johnson Received () McNamara- _ Referred () Minnix To () Nickens 2 ~ ~ ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 14, 2000 RESOLUTION 031400-6 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM - J CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. that the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for March 14, 2000, designated as Item J -Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 6, inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of minutes -December 7, 1999 2. Confirmation of committee appointment to the Library Board. 3. Request from Police Department to accept $500 donation from the Loyal Order of Moose Lodge 284 for the DARE program. 4. Approval of resolutions of appreciation upon the retirements of: a. Beverly Tys-Berson, Youth Haven II b. Donald R. Carroll, Utility Department 5. Request from Libraries to accept $2,105 in donations and grants and appropriate to the Library budget. 6. Request from Social Services Department to accept and appropriate $257,000 for Child Day Care Block Grant. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any 1 such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor McNamara to adopt the Consent Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~. Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File J. R. Lavinder, Chief of Police Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Spencer Watts, Director, Library Betty R. McCrary, Director, Social Services W. Bent Robertson, Budget Manager John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant Administrator 2 December 7, 1999 Roanoke County Administration Center 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 December 7, 1999 725 The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the first Tuesday and the first regularly scheduled meeting of the month of December, 1999. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Johnson called the meeting to order at 3:03 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Bob L. Johnson, Supervisors Fenton F. "Spike" Harrison, Joseph McNamara MEMBERS ABSENT: Supervisors H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix, Harry C. Nickens STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney; Mary H. Allen, Clerk; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator; Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator; Anne Marie Green, Director, Community Relations IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES The invocation was given by Gardner W. Smith, Director of the Procurement Department. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited by all present. IN RE: REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS December 7, 1999 7z7 properties in these developments, and will be designed to serve additional properties adjacent to these developments. Mr. Robertson advised that off-site fees will be up to $575,660 for water and $321,000 for sewer. Credits of approximately $68,000 for water and $93,000 for sewer would be given to the developers as the lots are developed. Staff recommends that 50% of the water and sewer off-site facility fees be credited to the developer up to the actual cost of the off-site construction, with 25% of the water and sewer off-site fees credited to lots when they are recorded, and an additional 25% of the fee credited when building permits are obtained on lots. Following discussion, Supervisor McNamara moved to approve the off-site water and sewer credits. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Harrison, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisors Minnix, Nickens ~ 1Bgs~uest for a .grant from the Commonwealth of Virginia Mr. Simpson reported that interest in a regional stormwater management December 7, 1999 729 grant runaing. Supervisor McNamara moved to approve the grant. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Harrison, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisors Minnix, Nickens RESOLUTION 120799_2 ENDORSING THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF A REGIONAL STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITY WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke is proposing to construct a regional stormwater management (SWM) facility at the site of the proposed new south County High School; and, WHEREAS, the proposed site of the stormwater management facility is identified in the "Roanoke Valley Regional stormwater Management Plan" as a desired regional facility; and, WHEREAS, the "Roanoke Valley Regional stormwater Management Plan" has been adopted upon Board action as part of the Comprehensive Plan; and, WHEREAS, the proposed SWM facility will provide positive benefits for stormwater quantity, water quality, downstream flooding, and will provide an opportunity for public education and awareness; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors and the Roanoke County School Board are pursuing this project as an integral part of the new south County High School site. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia are supportive of this proposed regional stormwater management facility at the proposed new south County High School site and authorize the County Administrator to pursue grant funding through the Virginia Water Quality Improvement Fund and Clean Water Act, Section 319 to construct said facility. On motion of Supervisor McNamara to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Harrison, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisors Minnix, Nickens IN RE: FIRST READINGS OF ORDINANCES December 7, 1999 731 Stonebridge irc a in inton, an tonebri ge states, nc., is t e owner o a parce _._I located at 2976 Stonebridge Circle in Vinton. The parcels are non-buildable because they are in a floodplain. The owners currently owe delinquent real estate taxes of $644.60 on these parcels and have requested that the taxes be forgiven upon donation to Roanoke County. Mr. Mahoney explained that there should be an appropriation of funds to pay the delinquent taxes to the Treasurer, and that there may be additional costs for title insurance, environmental assessment, and closing costs. In response to Board inquiries, Mr. Mahoney explained that the developers originally thought that the lots were buildable, but later found out they were in the floodplain; and that staff has concerns that this action is setting a precedent for future requests such as this. Mr. Hodge advised that there has been some contact with adjoining property owners to see if they are interested in purchasing the land. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the first reading and set the second reading for December 21, 1999. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Harrison, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisors Minnix, Nickens ~ First reading of ordinance amending Article III, Sewer Use December 7, 1999 733 taxation with a minimum annual license of $1,000. Several individuals who practice clinical hypnosis have requested a change to the County's business license ordinance to permit them to be taxed at a less punitive rate. According to state guidelines, hypnotists do not qualify as a professional service so staff is recommending that they be taxed under the personal and business service occupation category. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the first reading and set the second reading and public hearing for December 21, 1999. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Harrison, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisors Minnix, Nickens IN RE: CONSENT AGENDA Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the Consent Resolution The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Harrison, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisors Minnix, Nickens RESOLUTION 110799-3 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM J - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, 5 December 7, 1999 735 carried by a unanimous voice vote with Supervisors Minnix and Nickens absent. 1, General Fund Unap~ronriated Balance ~ Qanital Fund UnaR r~opriated Balance ~ Board Contingency Fund 4, Future School Capital Reserve ~, Revenues and Expenses for the four month period_end~d October, 1999. IN RE: REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS Supervisor McNamara (1) He advised that he attended the Roanoke County employee service .awards luncheon and congratulated those who were recognized for service milestones. (2) He announced that the Christmas Tree Lighting ceremony was held at the Brambleton Center and commended Parks and Recreation for the event. (3) He announced that Parks and Recreation had their Christmas luncheon but that he was unable to attend. Supervisor Harrison: He asked if the County staff was aggressively marketing the GlenMary economic development site with Virginia Tech. Mr. Hodge responded that Tech officials have been on the property but they are also looking at properties in other localities. Supervisor Johnson: He asked Mr. Mahoney if he had scheduled the annual meeting with the Roanoke Valley legislators. Mr. Mahoney advised that the _~ December 7, 1999 HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA 737 WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened a closed meeting on this date pursuant to an aft:trmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such closed meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the closed meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the closed meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Certification Resolution; and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Harrison, Johnson NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisors Minnix, Nickens IN RE: ADJOURNMENT At 4:55 p.m., Chairman Johnson adjourned the meeting. Submitted by, Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board Approved by, Bob L. Johnson Chairman A-031400-6 . a ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~~ ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 14, 2000 AGENDA ITEM: Confirmation of Committee appointment to the Library Board COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION Library Board At the February 29, 2000 meeting, Supervisor McNamara nominated David Smith to a four-year term representing the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. The term will expire December 31, 2003. STAFF RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Supervisor McNamara's nomination be confirmed. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Elmer C. Hodge Clerk to the Board County Administrator ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by: Joseph McNamara to approve Church _ x Denied () Johnson _ x Received () McNamara- x _ Referred () Minnix _ x _ To () Nickens _ x cc: File Library Board File A-031400-6. b ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 14, 2000 AGENDA ITEM: Request to accept $500 donation from the Loyal Order of Moose Lodge for the Police Department D.A.R.E. Program COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: On February 20, 2000, the Police Department received a donation of $500 from the Loyal Order of Moose Lodge #284. This money was designated by that organization to be used in the agency's D.A.R.E. Program STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the $500 donation be accepted for the D.A.R.E. Program. Respectfully Submitted by: Approved by: ~~G~ C~~~, ~~ J. R. Lavinder er C. Hodge Chief of Police County Administrator ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by: Joseph McNamara to approve Church _ x _ Denied () Johnson _ x _ Received () McNamara- x Referred () Minnix _ x To () Nickens _ x cc: File J. R. Lavinder, Chief of Police Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance J-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 14, 2000 RESOLUTION 031400-6.c EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY UPON THE RETIREMENT OF BEVERLY TYS-BERSON, YOUTH HAVEN II WHEREAS, Beverly Tys-Berson was first employed by Roanoke County on October 15, 1984, as the Director for Youth Haven I I, a group home for the treatment of adolescent girls, and; WHEREAS, Ms. Tys-Berson assisted in the siting, equipping, and development of the Youth Haven II program to serve up to 12 young women at a time through mentoring, counseling, and independent living skills as well as offering parenting skills and family participation in the treatment program to help the participants; and WHEREAS, Ms Tys-Berson sought to enhance the service provided to the community by Youth Haven II through the Family Friends program which provided respite care to families with special needs youth and also the 28 day assessment program of Youth Haven II which helped the court system to better match the treatment needs with the services to be provided to the young women of the program; and WHEREAS, Ms. Tys-Berson was instrumental in working with Delegate Thomas, the Mental Health Association of the Roanoke Valley, Blue Ridge Community Services, and the regional governments in developing the Keeping Our Kids At Home (KOKAH) project which provided short-term in-patient mental health treatment for needy children locally rather than placing the child in state facilities; and WHEREAS, Ms. Tys-Berson served on the Family Assessment and Planning Team (FAPT) for the City of Roanoke and the Community Policy and Management Team (CPMT) for the County of Roanoke to assist in determining the treatment needs, available services, 1 and funding options for children who qualified for services through the Comprehensive Services Act and the Virginia Juvenile Community Crime Control Act programs; and WHEREAS, Ms. Tys-Berson retired from Roanoke County on November 1, 1999 after fifteen years of service; and WHEREAS, Ms. Tys-Berson, through her employment with Roanoke County, has been instrumental in improving the quality of life for the youth of the Roanoke Valley and their families. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to BEVERLY TYS-BERSON for fifteen years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke County. FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy, restful, and productive retirement On motion of Supervisor McNamara to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: .cam- Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Resolutions of Appreciation File Joe Sgroi, Director, Human Resources John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 14, 2000 RESOLUTION 031400-6.d EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY UPON THE RETIREMENT OF DONALD R. CARROLL, UTILITY DEPARTMENT WHEREAS, Donald R. Carroll. was first employed by Roanoke County on December 7, 1981, as a Utility Maintenance Man; and WHEREAS, Mr. Carroll retired from Roanoke County on February 1, 2000, as a Motor Equipment Operator II after more than eighteen years of service; and WHEREAS, Mr. Carroll could be counted on to be "on the job" to keep the water and sewer systems in operation under the most rigorous conditions; and WHEREAS, Mr. Carroll's quiet, gentle humor and capable operation of equipment was a welcome addition to any work crew; and WHEREAS, Mr. Carroll, through his employment with Roanoke County, has been instrumental in improving the quality of life for its citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to DONALD R. CARROLL for more than eighteen years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke County. 1 FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy, restful, and productive retirement. On motion of Supervisor McNamara to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~~ Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Resolutions of Appreciation File Joe Sgroi, Director, Human Resources Gary Robertson, Director, Utility 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER `*~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 14, 2000 AGENDA ITEM: Request for approval of resolutions of appreciation upon the retirements of Beverly Tys-Berson, Youth Haven I I, and Donald R. Carroll, Utility Department COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Human Resources Department has notified us that Beverly Tys-Berson, Youth Haven I I, retired on November 1, 1999, and Donald R. Carroll, Utility Department, retired on February 1, 2000. They each were invited to attend a Board meeting to receive a resolution of appreciation, but requested that their resolution be mailed to them. It is recommended that the Board approve the attached resolutions and direct the Deputy Clerk to mail them to the retirees with thanks from the Board members for their many years of services to the County. Respectfully submitted, Brenda J. Holton, CMC Deputy Clerk Approved by, ~~~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved () Motion by: Church _ _ _ Denied () Johnson _ Received () McNamara- Referred () Minnix _ To () Nickens ,' sy AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 14, 2000 RESOLUTION EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY UPON THE RETIREMENT OF BEVERLY TYS-BERSON, YOUTH HAVEN II WHEREAS, Beverly Tys-Berson was first employed by Roanoke County on October 15, 1984, as the Director for Youth Haven I I, a group home for the treatment of adolescent girls, and; WHEREAS, Ms. Tys-Berson assisted in the siting, equipping, and development of the Youth Haven II program to serve up to 12 young women at a time through mentoring, counseling, and independent living skills as well as offering parenting skills and family participation in the treatment program to help the participants; and WHEREAS, Ms Tys-Berson sought to enhance the service provided to the community by Youth Haven II through the Family Friends program which provided respite care to families with special needs youth and also the 28 day assessment program of Youth Haven II which helped the court system to better match the treatment needs with the services to be provided to the young women of the program; and WHEREAS, Ms. Tys-Berson was instrumental in working with Delegate Thomas, the Mental Health Association of the Roanoke Valley, Blue Ridge Community Services, and the regional governments in developing the Keeping Our Kids At Home (KOKAH) project which provided short-term in-patient mental health treatment for needy children locally rather than placing the child in state facilities; and WHEREAS, Ms. Tys-Berson served on the FamilyAssessment and Planning Team 1 s-y (FAPT) for the City of Roanoke and the Community Policy and Management Team (CPMT) for the County of Roanoke to assist in determining the treatment needs, available services, and funding options for children who qualified for services through the Comprehensive Services Act and the Virginia Juvenile Community Crime Control Act programs; and WHEREAS, Ms. Tys-Berson retired from Roanoke County on November 1, 1999 after fifteen years of service; and WHEREAS, Ms. Tys-Berson, through her employment with Roanoke County, has been instrumental in improving the quality of life for the youth of the Roanoke Valley and their families. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to BEVERLY TYS-BERSON for fifteen years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke County. FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy, restful, and productive retirement 2 ~'-y AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 14, 2000 RESOLUTION EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY UPON THE RETIREMENT OF DONALD R. CARROLL UTILITY DEPARTMENT WHEREAS, Donald R. Carroll. was first employed by Roanoke County on December 7, 1981, as a Utility Maintenance Man; and WHEREAS, Mr. Carroll retired from Roanoke County on February 1, 2000, as a Motor Equipment Operator II after more than eighteen years of service; and WHEREAS, Mr. Carroll could be counted on to be "on the job" to keep the water and sewer systems in operation under the most rigorous conditions; and WHEREAS, Mr. Carroll's quiet, gentle humor and capable operation of equipment was a welcome addition to any work crew; and WHEREAS, Mr. Carroll, through his employment with Roanoke County, has been instrumental in improving the quality of life for its citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to DONALD R. CARROLL for more than eighteen years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke County. 1 ~' ~,..,f •~ FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy, restful, and productive retirement. 2 A-031400-6.e ACTION NO. ITEM NO. 3 =5 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 14, 2000 AGENDA ITEM: Acceptance of Donations and Grants for the Public Library and Appropriation of Funds to the Public Library Budget COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Library has recently received several helpful grants and donations. Valley Beautiful has awarded a grant of $1,300 for the acquisition of books and videos in support of the Urban Forestry Collection. The Bent Mountain Woman's Club has donated $305 for the purchase of a new magazine housing unit for the Bent Mt. Library. The Vinton Junior Woman's Club has given the Library $500 to purchase items which support children's services. FISCAL IMPACT: Acceptance and appropriation of the donated funds and grant monies will require no additional expenditures by the County. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommend the acceptance of the donations and grant, with appropriation of $2,105 to the Library's budget. Spencer Watts J Library Director ~~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Motion by: Joseph McNamara to approve VOTE No Yes Abs Church _ x _ Johnson _ x McNamara- x Minnix _ x _ Nickens x cc: File Spencer Watts, Director, Library Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance ~~ A-031400-6.f ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 14, 2000 AGENDA ITEM: Request to Appropriate $257,000 for Child Day Care Block Grant for the Department of Social Services COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: QQ ~~ ` (ICjc'°~ °~~ BACKGROUND: The Department of Social Services receives, throughout the year, additional appropriations for public assistance and services delivery. The State has made available an additional $257,000 State money for day care services to children. The Department of Social Services cannot access these State funds until the County has appropriated the same. The Board of Supervisors is requested to appropriate $257,000 to the Social Services budget and to appropriate the related revenues from the State. FISCAL IMPACT: None. The requested appropriation is 100% reimbursable State money made available to the locality by the State Department of Social Services. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends appropriation of $257,000 to the 99/00 Social Services budget for the Child Day Care Block Grant program. 1 ,+~ ~"' Respectfully submitted, ~~~~~ Betty R. cCrary, Ph.D. Director of Social Servic Approved by, ~~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by: Joseph McNamara to approve Church - x - Denied () Johnson - x - Received () McNamara- x Referred () Minnix _ x To () Nickens x - - cc: File Betty R. McCrary, Director, Social Services W. Bent Robertson, Budget Manager John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant Administrator 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 14, 2000 AGENDA ITEM: Request to schedule a budget work session COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: We have not been able to allocate as much time as I would like to discuss the 2000-2001 budget in a work session format, and I would like to schedule an evening or Saturday meeting for this purpose when it might also be possible to invite the School Board to attend. Please review your calendars so that we may schedule a budget work session that is convenient for all of you. When we schedule a meeting date, I will forward an invitation to the School Board also. Respectfully submitted by: 1~~/YKw Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE No. Yes Abs Approved () Motion by: Church - - Denied () Johnson - - Received () McNamara- - Referred () Minnix - - To () Nickens ~~~~~ ~ p,OAN ,~ O L ~ "~~ ` 2 ~ ~ 2 O ~ 18 9 AGENDA ITEM NO. ~_ APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING SUBJECT: S~ to ~~'l cz.r OWL '/ G2JZ, I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, /WILL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the oard. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: __ ~a,vi C~ • P~tcv~l2 ADDRESS: d~~02 S`iG•c,rrtati ~~ PHONE: ~~.3 -/ -j~~ -ORDINANCECITIZEN COMMENTS Safety and Security Committee Roanoke County Schools Safe and Drug-Free Schools Needs Assessment Data Justification for Adequate School Resource Officer Services January 24, ?000 In early May of 1999, an Evaluation Consultant and the Student Assistance Program (SAP) staff examined valid, relevant information from which to assess the needs of primarily secondary grade students in regards to the prevention and intervention of violent and drug-use behaviors and attitudes. The needs assessment included many sources such as: The Student Assistance Management Information and Evaluation instrument completed by 8`'' and 11`x' grade students in April 1998; 1998-99 Roanoke County Schools Student Assistance Program Stats; 1995-97 student self-reported substance use histories; the 1997 Virginia Uniform Crime Report by the Department of State Police: Roanoke County School Service Unit monthly reports from September 1998 through March 1999; 1997-98 Virginia of Education Crime and Violence Report; Roanoke County School's discipline and attendance reports for 1997-98; Environment Health and Public Health Report Cards, 1998, for Allegheny/Roanoke Health Districts; 1997 Kids Count in Virginia; 1997 data from Roanoke County Child Abuse and Protective Social Services; and 1997 data from the Roanoke County Family Assessment Planning Team. Copies of the accumulated data were distributed among participants at a two-day work session. Participants selected pieces of the data and highlighted what appeared to be significant: • According to state rank • According to comparison with regional localities • According to difference from national norms • Chances in prior reports to present. The "Communities that Care Model (Hawkins & Catalano) categorized the data according to risk and protective factors and individuaUpeer, school. community and family domains. Roanoke County Schools utilizes the Virginia Effective Practices Model as a guide for comprehensive and collaborative safe and drug-free school and community prevention planning. The two-day working session focused primarily on the role of the school domain. The examination revealed the following information regarding Roanoke County Schools. a.... '- • Severity and Magnitude of Problems and other findings • The majority of students report beginning nicotine, marijuana and alcohol usage from 8-9~' grades; nicotine, marijuana and alcohol are the most commonly used drugs among students 6-12 grades. • 41 % of 8`h grade students and 66% if 11 `t' grades students have smoked cigarettes. 17% of 8`h grades students who smoke cigarettes with in a thirty day period, 11 % of them moke 5 cigarettes to 2 or more packs per day. 37% of 11`h grade students who smoke cigarettes within a thirty-day period smoke 5 cigarettes to ? or more packs per day. There appears to be a trend of a probable increase of 25 % of student cigarette use between 8th and 11th grades with an increase of more regular use. • 80% of 8th grade and 96% of 11 `h grade students perceive cigarettes to be easy to obtain. • 55% of the 8`h grade students have tried alcohol and 6~% of them indicated they had used in the past year. 83%, of 1 lth grade students report having tried alcohol and 49% of the eleventh graders report being drunk 30 days prior to taking the survey; 9% of 8`h graders and ?6~'0 of eleventh Graders report binge drinking (five or more drinks on one ,occasion) within a two week period of taking the survey. There appears to be a trend of a probable 34% increase of student's alcohol use between 8th and 11th grades with an increase of more regular use. • 71 % of 8`" grade and 90% of 11 `h grade students perceive alcohol to be easy to obtain • 46% of the 11`h graders indicated they have tried marijuana and 6~~0 of the 46~"o reported use within the past year or 30 days. 16 ~o of the eight graders have tried marijuana and ?0% of them reported use within the past year or 30 days. There appears to be a trend of a probable 30% increase of student marijuana use between the 8th and 11th grades with an increase of more regular use. • 37% of 8`h grade and 77% of 11 grade students perceive marijuana to be easily obtained. • Inhalant abuse among 8`h graders is 12% in contrast to 4% among 11`r' graders. Inhalant abuse among 6-8~' graders is only slightly less significant than marijuana.abuse. • 48% of substance abusers use for psychological benefits and 33% indicate problems at home that interfere with their school work or ability to concentrate; 24% indicate parental substance use problems; 20% indicate depressed moods; 28% had serious thoughts of suicide; 36% indicate being anxious or worried; 24% are fearful of physical harm and 9% of sexual abuse and 33% indicate eating problems. • Data indicates that substance abusers have an average grade of C or lower. skips school and classes at a minimum of 3 times with in four- week periods. In 1997-98, students in grades 6-12 skipped school 897 times and were tardy 2,727 times. • According to Roanoke County Schools Discipline and Attendance Reports for 1997-98, in 1997-98 there were 1,196 disciplinary infractions for failing to following directions, and 1,542 incidents of discipline actions taken for disrespect, profanity, disruptive and other inappropriate behaviors. More specifically, in the school year 1997-98 in grades 6 through 12 there were 235 incidents of fights with none or minor injuries to students; 77 physical assaults without a weapon and one with a weapon. 39 incidents of bullying and 2 violations of inappropriate touching. Offenses against staff included one rape charge; 3 physical assaults without weapons; 15 threats and 3 occurrence of inappropriate touching. There were 463 students suspended for ten days or less and 5 students suspended for 11-364 days; 2 expulsions for 36~ days or more for possession of knifes and 2 students expelled for other reasons. One firearm was confiscated during the 97-98 school year. Substance possession violations were as follows: 266 tobacco; 13 alcohol; 39 '`other drugs;" and drug paraphernalia were 2. • The 1997 Virginia State Crime report, juvenile data, indicates that in Roanoke County secondary schools that year there were 49 liquor law violations; 9 driving under the influence; ~ drunk in public; 42 disorderly conducts; 26 curfew and loitering, 7 runaway; and 46 assaults and 75 larceny charges against juveniles 14-17 years old. • Roanoke County ranked 103 out of 135 in the state for juvenile intake cases involving•delinquency with an increase of approximately 10% more cases brought before. juvenile intake. • Middle and secondary schools teachers training needs survey indicates a high desire for skills to deal more effectively with student conflicts and parents who present as being uncooperative. The science and math supervisors cited several areas for improvement among the faculty in their departments. • Roanoke County ranks 96 out of 135 in the state for violent deaths among 14-17 year olds. Student Survey responses regarding helping a friend who may be suicidal indicate that 74% of 8~' and 1 l~' graders would talk to the person; 40% of 8`~ and 11`~ grades males would get a counselor in contrast to 52% for girls: 24% of both males and females would tell an adult with permission from the students while ~3% of the males and 6~% of the females would tell an adult without permission. • Data indicates that one out of every four adults twenty-five and over in Roanoke County do not have a high school diploma. 1,667 students receive free or reduced lunches for 98-99 .school year. Roanoke County students in grades 6 through 8 ranked 1 l~ out of 135 in passing all four physical fitness tests. • In June 1998 the Public Health Report indicated that l~010 of the families in Roanoke County do not have health insurance. In 1997, 223 complaints of child abuse were reported and 39 founded. ~2 new referrals were made to the Family Assessment and Planning Team and 97 students were served in 1997. • In 1997, adults in Roanoke County were charged with 341 DUI's, 206 for public drunkenness; 6~ for liquor law violations; 27 selling narcotics; 199 for possession of narcotics; 345 for assaults: 25 for aggravated assault; 3 murders, and 6 forcible rapes. • Analysis of Objective Data Indicates the Following Priorities • Nicotine, alcohol and marijuana are the most commonly used drugs among 6-12 grade students. • The age of onset of nicotine, alcohol and marijuana use is before or during the ninth grade. • Among middle school students' inhalants, such as glue, gasoline and paint thinner are the most commonly used substance other than nicotine, alcohol and marijuana. • Substance users are more likely than non-using students to do little or no homework, to have low grades, skip school, be arrested and have involvement with the juvenile justice system. • Family management problems, parental substance abuse and the lack of a high school education are associated with youth violence, substance use, and other at-risk behaviors. • Adolescent arrests at school for being disruptive in the classroom and other violent behaviors on school property continue to rise. • Adolescent emotional distress continues to rise as is evident in a high number of suicides and an increase number of referrals to child protective services and to the student assistance program that are non-substance use related but are other destructive behaviors such as eating disorders; fears of sexual abuse or being homeless. etc. y 6 • Identified Needs The majority of students in grades 6-12 in Roanoke County Schools begin using alcohol, cigarettes and marijuana between the 8 and 9 grades. These are the most common drugs abused however students in middle and junior high schools abuse inhalants almost as much as marijuana. Students who use substances have lower grades, skip and are tardy more often to school than those who do not. Substance using students and students who have family members with substances use problems site more family problems, suicidal ideation, fears of physical and sexual abuse and other mental health concerns more frequently than those who do not have substance abuse related problems. However, these conditions often proceed student violence and substance abuse. The above mentioned conditions disrupt academic success, negatively effects school climate and increases the likelihood of violent behaviors, mental and physical health problems. There is a high percentage of school discipline violations, tardy and absences, juvenile arrest and an increased level of juvenile intakes over the prior year. A significant amount of instruction time is lost dealing with conflicts with students. Teachers avoid contacting defensive parents. These conditions disrupt academic success: negatively effect school climate, decrease school safety and increase the likelihood of violent behaviors, substance abuse, mental and physical health problems. • Needs Linked to Services Research indicates that the Student Assistance Program (SAP) is an effective model from which to address universal and selective prevention planning for substance abuse, disruptive and destructive student behaviors. It is an effective method for collaboration among students, parents, faculty, nurses, school resource officers, other school personnel, courts and community agencies. Service activities and partnerships include but are not limited to faculty training, parent education, student ~_ .. identification and referral, small group sessions, co-teaching violence and substance abuse classroom prevention cumcula. • School Resources Officers and Student Assistance Program Services ' are key components to School Safety: • The Partnership among School Resource Officers. (SRO), Student Assistance Programs (SAP) and the Juvenile Justice System effectively cease and reduce violent behaviors and alcohol and other drug use among Virginia's youth. • The outbreak of school violence can be attributed to the lack of intervening into aggression before it becomes an event. An essential element in this process is a coordinated effort among school communities, School Resource Officers and Student Assistance Professionals. The goals and objectives of this joint effort are to provide a safe neighborhood environment where students are the citizens served. This essential partnership further establishes the safety and security that is mandated through due process in the school community. • In order for the SRO to be effective in the school community, the essential partnership of the SRO and the SAP is needed for the proper intervention into youth related matters that have not reached the enforcement stage and has not reached the Juvenile Justice system. • SRO and SAP teams function in school communities to secure a safe and orderly environment for students to reach academic potential. • The Juvenile Justice System applies sanctions to students and parents who break the law which empower the SRO/SAP team to effectively assistance students who are in the school community. • There is an increase in attendance, grades and decrease in disruptive behaviors when students are held accountable by the SRO/SAP team. r ~ ~ ' • The SRO/SAP team plans, implements and maintains effective prevention and intervention programs which include students, parents, businesses, faith and community services. • The attached Exhibit illustrates the active involvement of the present SROs in Roanoke County high school discipline and safety matters during the 199899 school. year. • The SRO are recognized as critical members of school Critical Incident Response and Prevention teams. ~, ~~ GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Amount Unaudited Beginning Balance at July 1, 1999 $6,750,027 Results of Operations for 1998-99 1,058,946 Audited Beginning Balance at July 1, 1999 7,808,973 Oct 12, 1999 Consultant for regional refuse collection study Feb 14, 2000 Hazdy Road bikeways and sidewalks Balance at Mazch 14, 2000 Changes below this line aze for information and planning purposes only. Balance from above (17,558) (3,000) of General Fund Revenues 5.94% $7,788,415 6.85% $7,788,415 $7,788,415 6.85% Note: On December 18, 1990, the Boazd of Supervisors adopted a goal statement to maintain the General Fund Unappropriated Balance at 6.25% of General Fund Revenues 1999 2000 General Fund Revenues $113,709,991 6.25% of General Fund Revenues $7,106,874 Respectfully Submitted, ~~ ~~ Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance Approved By, ~i/~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator M:\Finance\Common\B oazd\Gen99. WK4 r "~ CAPITAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Amount Balance from June 22, 1999 Board meeting Dixie Caverns Recovery Sale of land and equipment during 1998-99 Unaudited Beginning Balance at July 1, 1999 ov 9, 1999 Transfer from General Fund for 1998-99 expenditure savings (with $40,646 reserved for pending rollovers) Sept 14, 1999 Advance Auto performance agreement (This money will be reimbursed to the capital fund from future tax collections) Oct 26,1999 Purchase of land adjacent to Vinyard Park II Feb 29, 2000 Blue Ridge Parkway Interpretive Center Balance at March 14, 2000 Respectfully Submitted, .~~. ~_` Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance Approved By, ~ ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator $11,042.93 137,500.00 354,643.16 503,186.09 384,832.00 (226,650.00) (41,000.00) (300,000. $320.368.09 I M:\Finance\Common\Board\Cap99.WK4 1/' RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA From 1999-2000 Original Budget y 27, 1999 General Fund share of VACO/ VML assessment for AEP negotiations July 27, 1999 Green Hill soccer field Dec 21, 1999 Presidential primary election 21, 1999 Overtime for Ft. Lewis Mountain fire Balance at March 14, 2000 Respectfully Submitted, Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance Approved By, ~~~~"'v` Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Amount $100,000.00 ~ (4,749.00 (47,000.00 (15,410.00 (20,617.85 $12,223.15 ~ M:\Finance\Common\Board\Board99.WK4 r~ y FUTURE SCHOOL CAPITAL RESERVE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Amount Savings from 1996-97 debt budget Transfer from County Capital Projects Fund FY97-98 Original budget appropriation June 23, 1998 Savings from 1997-98 debt fund FY98-99 Original budget appropriation FY99-200 Original budget appropriation Less increase in debt service November 9, 1999 Savings from 1998-99 debt fund Balance at March 14, 2000 $7,380,323.00 The following funds have been temporarily advanced from this fund will be reimbursed with future bonds issues: Balance from above $7,380,323 Land purchase and site work for new South County high school (4,000,000) Science Labs (2,170,600) $1 209,723 ote :These advances will be reimbursed with the 1999 Fall VPSA Bond Sale. Respectfully Submitted, ~~ ~= Diane D. Hyatt Director of Finance Approved By, ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator $670,000.00 1,113,043.00 2,000,000.00 321,772.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000 (1,219,855) 780,145.00 495,363.00 M:\Finance\Common\Board\Schoo199.WK4 ~y ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~°"'-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 14, 2000. AGENDA ITEMS: Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investments and Portfolio Policy, as of February 29, 2000. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: BANKERS ACCEPTANCE: BANK OF AMERICA 993,719.44 BRANCH BANKING & TRUST 3,735,346.59 WHEAT 1ST UNION 993,131.94 5, 722,197.97 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSITS: FIRST AMERICAN 100,000.00 SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA SAVINGS & LOAN 100,000.00 200,000.00 COMMERICAL PAPER: PAI N E-WEBBER 4, 964,689.44 SUNTRUST 1,986,198.89 WACHOVIA 1,986,158.33 WHEAT 1ST UNION 2,185,591.67 11,122,638.33 LOCAL GOVT INVESTMENT POOL: GENERAL FUND 7,839,288.17 RESOURCE AUTHORITY 1,874,919.01 9,714,207.18 MONEY MARKET: CRESTAR 5,400,735.20 FIRST UNION 2,051,465.73 PAINE-WEBBER 659,509.74 8,111,710.67 CASH INVESTMENTS: CRESTAR 14,067,519.24 LB&T 3,208,804.44 MENTOR - G.O. 5,345,514.86 MENTOR - R.A. 5,692,881.08 WACHOVIA 2,307,483.93 30,622,203.55 GOVERNMENT WHEAT 1ST UNION 991,983.33 991,983.33 TOTAL 66, 484, 941.03 Page 1 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER IV""..7 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 14, 2000. AGENDA ITEMS: Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investments and Portfolio Policy, as of February 29, 2000. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Respectful) Su mitted by Alfred . A erson Cou y Treasurer ACTION Approved ()Motion by: Denied () Church Received () Johnson Referred () McNamara To () Minnix Nickens Approved by: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator VOTE No Yes Abs Page 2 of 2 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~- //' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 14, 2000 SUBJECT: Results of water and sewer rate study and possible changes in rates for customers COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: .,~ d~ ~ ~ -~ BACKGROUND: The drought of 1999 presented Roanoke County with the unique opportunity of offering our residents a decrease in their water rates. Under the previous water contract, Roanoke County would have been obligated to spend $1,502,941 to purchase water from Roanoke City. Because of the new contract, we will now be able to trade water with Roanoke City and use water from our own reservoir at an estimated annual cost of $730,000. This will result in a net average savings to Roanoke County of $772,941. This is the basis for our rate reduction. As you are aware, we cannot implement the rate reduction until July 1, 2000 because of the one-time expense of buying capacity in Roanoke City's distribution system. The sale of surplus water to Roanoke City from July 1, 1999 until Decemberl8, 1999 resulted in additional revenues of $903,957. A summary of the impact the new contract had on the 1999-2000 budget is as follows: $1,502,941 Budget amount of 1999-2000 purchase of water from Roanoke City. 903,957 Additional revenue from sale of surplus water to Roanoke City. (1,600,000) Cost for Roanoke County to buy 3 MGD distribution capacity from Roanoke City. ( 730,000) Estimated cost for Roanoke County to supply water we would have purchased from Roanoke City. ( 55,000) Roanoke County cost for interconnections at Grandin Road, Colonial. Brambleton, Ogden, Route 460, Peters Creek Rd. ~~$~$- Net 1999-2000 Revenue SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: When considering the amount of the decrease staff felt we could afford, several criteria were considered: Revenue covenants from the water revenue bond trust indenture must continue to be met. 2. Sufficient revenue be retained to be able to fund needed capital expenditures of the system. 3. Rates should not be lowered so drastically that a rate increase would be needed in the next few years. Along with the water rate reduction, staff is proposing several exciting changes that will be beneficial to our customers. These changes are related to our billing system and meter reading system. Utility Billing Staff is presently working on changes to our billing software that will allow us to place customer information on the Internet. (This will be password protected, but will allow customers to check the status of their bill), improve our budget billing process, and make the system more user friendly. In addition, we will be streamlining the appearance of our bills with free form message capability and laser printing. The Phase I cost of these changes will be $100,000. Meter Reading Staff believes that monthly reading is key to an efficient and understandable system. Currently residential meters are read on a quarterly basis with three meter readers. As our system expands and we move to monthly reading, we will either need to increase staff or evaluate other alternatives. Rather than increase the size of staff, we believe the future is in automatic meter reading (AMR). Our first step will be to install AMR in large commercial accounts that are presently read monthly and require two personnel to read (because of confined space requirements). We plan to begin installation of these devices in the 2000-2001 fiscal year. We would also recommend a 10-year plan for installing AMR county wide. This would begin with new construction and a systematic retrofit of existing meters. Our current estimate for the project would be an annual appropriation of $250,000 for a period often years. In addition to these items, we are faced with many other capital needs such as continued replacement of aging infrastructure in residential areas, additional water storage tanks, and future expansion and interconnection within our distribution system. At present we budget $350,000 per year for capital (repair and replacement). This amount has not been increased since 1991 and staff recommends an increase of $150,000 to $500,000 annually. The net savings of $772,941 from purchased water less the $150,000 increase in future capital cost leaves a balance of $622,941. In order to achieve this reduction in revenues, we recommend a 6.6% decrease in revenues. Staff is confident that this reduction will allow us to meet the criteria listed earlier. Our consultants, Draper Aden Associates concurred with our overall rate reduction and reviewed various options to achieve this overall decrease. We had initially hoped that we could change the entire ~~ Y ~ structure of our billing system from ausage-based system to a meter size system. However, based on the analysis performed by Draper Aden, wide variability in customer bills would have resulted. Some customers would have received 200% decreases and some would have received 200% increases. After reviewing over a dozen options, the preferred method was to reduce the current base charge by 6.6% and leave the volume charge as it is. This will allow the largest benefit to the low volume users and somewhat reduce the discrepancy that occurs when a customer moves from one usage category to the next. Along with the water rate reduction, we are recommending a re-allocation of the sewer rate. This will lower the percentage of the charge that is in the base charge and increase the percentage of the charge that is in the volume charge. This will also benefit the low volume user. The overall sewer revenues will remain the same. It does appear that based upon the current sewer revenue projections, we will be running into a deficit situation in the sewer fund in 2003-2004. Should the Board elect to proceed with a 6.6% reduction in revenue and the method of implementation recommended by staff and Draper Aden, it is anticipated that all customers will receive a rate reduction; however the amount could vary significantly. For instance, a single person that uses very little water could see a reduction of around 12%, an average family of 3-4 persons may see a reduction between 7-8%, while a very large water user may see a reduction of .5% to 1%. During the work session Draper Aden will present their findings, review the option considered, and evaluate their impacts. Staff and Draper Aden will be available to answer your questions. SUBMITTED BY: Gary Rob son, P.E. Utility Director APPROVED: ~~ ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Diane Hyatt Director of Finance Approved ( ) Denied () _ Received ( ) Referred ACTION Motion by:_ VOTE No Yes Abs Church _ _ _ Johnson McNamara _ _ Minnix _ _ _ Nickens to _.~ -~ County of Roanoke Calendar for Implementation of Water and Sewer Rate Change Option 1 for a 60 day lead time: March 14, 2000 Work session with Board of Supervisors March 21, 2000 Publication of First Advertisement March 28, 2000 Publication of Second Advertisement April 11, 2000 First Reading of Ordinance April 25, 2000 Second Reading of Ordinance and Pubic Hearing July 1, 2000 Implementation Option 2 for a 30 day lead time: March 14, 2000 Work session with Board of Supervisors April 18, 2000 April 25, 2000 May 9, 2000 May 23, 2000 Publication of First Advertisement Publication of Second Advertisement First Reading of Ordinance Second Reading of Ordinance and Pubic Hearing July 1, 2000 Implementation F .....w ey .. -i _ ..u..- h w ~e+. _ m'il` ....x.,f ~. i:~~ ~ Y.. '~kTSWk '..'i31Y'-'^~ 'f' F+S`Aa'i. t Ai:N!14'3'~YG@i#'°AMT __ - mnrmve~r.r®an®ke.c®~n V~~°~2~z~a ~i~r~'t ~,~~cl2cded 2n tj~e fede~~al wa~rz2~~9' r r ri ~u -The gl•eatest hope for bi~eakirig the In a lust-of-its-kind sprig drought: Cj i'oUg'ht 1S ari UI1USUally Wet look, grim-looking officials from several 11UI'P1Ca,ri@ aricl tI'opical St01'm S@c`LSOIl. eral agenciesforecast adry sprutg and e stmuner irr the Midwest and particularly in hiVl(>H7''Etm~rR%I'ItIBrI1vE already parched Southern third of the nat W~SHING'CON - 'Phis warm, dry' winter The Northeast, aild~West get apass-taus tire, has adark side. Adrought.- has developed Lauisiana, Mississippi `and'Alab across the souther~l United States and much of experiencedtheir driest February's ~in ~'. the Midwest; and it's likely to get worse in years, they reported.Parts ofTexasare liE .many areas before it goes away, the govern- ing into a tltird year. of vicious drbight,'" merit said Monday. PLEASE SEE DROUGHT 1=RC~~ al forest fires are breaking out ctt four tunes their t;or•rnai I'ae ntrrt.€1.~:~it~,7de. ]Juan as f:3r~casters vvarrted of a very dry spring; heavy ;~i'.orrns rumbled through the :youth, dropping rain by the inches. That~woi't be enough, givrti what the corning months look like, said Ar1ts Leetmaa, direct~~r of the federal Climate Prediction Center in suburban Maryland. Virginia.---hit hard by drought last surnnrer -- is not included in the federal drought warning. But it is expected to get less rain than normal this spring, continuing a pattern of scarce rains that began in July 1998. Roanoke officials are busy trying to strengthen the city's water supply after last year's drought reduced the water level in Carvins Cave to a record-low 29.2 feet below capacity, nearly triggering mandatory water-rationing requirements for the first tine in the city's history. The water level has been normal this winter thanks to normal rainfall, vvater conservation by city customers and water purchases from neighboring jurisdictions, according to city It i~ too ea7'ly to tell what ~ year's predicted drought w~ ~~rraea7z to food p~3~rl~ic~t~i~rr cz pr2ceS, Q•72 ecoyLOrrL?.fit ~a2C officials. The level was 8.8 feet below the ; Monday. I'he Midwest should expect hot, dry v federal meteorologists said. The anti drought has the potential to be a on generation-level shortfall in the nation'. land, said Cody Knutson, a water resour~ cialist at the National Drought Niitigatior at the University of Nebraska in Lincoh son's center is warning farmers to swig water-hungry corn to drought-tolerant so It is too early to tell what this yea dieted drought would mean to food pro and prices, said Keith Collins, U.S. llep; of Agriculture chief economist. ThE drought caused some food prices to rise said. Projected Water and Sewer Revenue for 2000/2001 Roanoke County Rate Study Option #1a(1) Jan-00 Monthly Consumpt ion Range Water Sewer 0 o nnua ° o nnua Monthly Customer ' Base Monthly ' Customer Base From To Base Rate ' Base Revenue Base Rate Base Revenue 0'' 10 $12.03 ~ 92.00%i $2,467,101 $8.31 ' 92.00%, $1,400,815 _. _ 11' 14 $18.05 ' _ ._ 5.00% $201,122 $12.47 ' 5.00%' $114,280 15~ 17 $30.08 1.00% $67,041 $20.78 - _ 1.00% _ __ $38,082 18' 28 $49.91 0.80%' $89,001 $34.50 ' 0.80%' $50,564 29' 39 $69.76 ' 0.25% $38,875 $48.20 0.25% __ $22,078 40' 54 $96.21. 0.20%' $42,894 $66.49 ' 0.20% $24,365 55'' 69 $123.86 0.15% $41,414 $85.60 0.15% $23,527 70 111 $200.24 0.15% $66,954 $138.37 0.15%' $38,030 _. 112 153 $276.60 0.12% $73,990 $191.15 0.12%' $42,028 154 210 $379.43 0.10%, $84,580 $262.20 i 0.10%i $48,042 211' 267 $482.25 0.05%L $53,750 $333.26 ' 0.05% $30,531 268' 440 $794.33 ' , 0.05%, $88,533 $548.92 0.05% $50,289 441 613 $1,106.40 0.03% $73,989 $764.58 0.03%. $42,028 614' 853 $1,539.35 0.03% $102,942 $1,063.77 0.03% $58,474 854 1093 $1,972.27 0.03%% $131,893 $1,362.96. 0.03% $74,920 1094, 1400 $2,525.49 0.01 %', _ $56,296 _ $1,745.25 0.01 % $31,978 1401' 1707 $3,078.69 ', 0.01 %'', $68,628 $2,127.54 0.01 % $38,983 1708 2087 $3,764.17 0.01 % $83,908 $2,601.26 ' 0.01 %' $47,662 2088 2467 , $4,449.67 . 0.01 % _. _ $99,188 _ $3,074.96 0.01 % $56,342 Total Annual Base Charge 47% $3,932,097 43% $2,233,018 Volume Charge (per 1,00 0 gallons) $2.05 $1.40 Total Annual Volume Charge 53% $4,421,284 57% $2,912,218 2000-2001 Total Revenue $8,353,382 $5,145,235 Notes: 1. Base Rate Based Upon Consumption 2. Adjusted % of Base Charge vs. Volume Charge Projected Water and Sewer Revenue for 2000/2001 Roanoke County Rate Study Option #1a(2) Jan-00 Monthly Consumption Range Water Sewer o o nnua o o nnua Monthly Customer Base Monthly Customer Base From To Base Rate Base Revenue Base Rate Base Revenue 0 10 $12.96 ', 92.00%' $2,657,824 $8.31 ', 92.00% _: $1,400,815 11 ~ 14 $19.44 __ ~ 5.00%', $216,670 _ _ __ $12.47 ' 5.00%' $114,280_ 15 17 $32.40 1.00%, $72,223 $20.78 1.00% $38,082 18' 28 $53.77 ' 0.80%' $95,881 $34.50 ' 0.80% $50,564 29' 39 $75.15 0.25% $41,880 $48.20. 0.25% $22,078 40' 54 $103.65 0.20%' $46,211 $66.49 0.20%, $24,365 55 69 _ _ $133.43 ' _ 0.15%' $44,616 , $85.60 ', 0.15%' , $23,527 70 111 . $215.72 _ 0...1.5%', $72,130 $138.37 _ 0.15%, $38,030 112 153 $297.99 0.12%' $79,710 $191.15 ' 0.12% $42,028 154 ' 210 $408.76 ' 0.10%' $91,118 $262.20 0.10% $48,042 211 ' 267 __ $519.53 ' 0.05% _ $57,905 $333.26 _ __ 0.05% $30,531 268,_, _, 440 $855.73 0.05%, $95,377 $548.92 _ 0.05%~ $50,289 441' 613 $1,191.93 0.03% $79,708 $764.58 ' 0.03%' $42,028 614 ' 853 $1,658.35 0.03% $110,900 _ $1,063.77 _ _ 0.03% $58,474 854 1093 $2,124.74 0.03%' $142,089 __ _ $1,362.96 0.03% __ $74,920 1094 __ 1400 $2,720.73 0.01 %, $60,648 $1,745.25 0.01 %, $31,978 1401 1707 $3,316.69 ' 0.01 %'. $73,933 $2,127.54 ' 0.01 %' $38,983 1708 2087 $4,055.17 0.01 %'' $90,395 $2,601.26 ' 0.01 %'' $47,662 2088 ' 2467 $4,793.66 0.01 % $106,856 $3,074.96 0.01 %' $56,342 Tofal Annua! Base Charge 51 % $4, 236, 075 43 % $2, 233, 018 Volume Charge (per 1,00 0 gallons) $1.91 $1.40 Total Annual Volume Charge 49% $4,119,343 57% $2,912,218 2000-2001 Total Revenue $8,355,418 $5,145,235 Notes: 1. Base Rate Based Upon Consumption 2. Adjusted % of Base Charge vs. Volume Charge 1 C O .Q N c O U CO iC0.C0 O O o ~. O~,d7 O).N,\ O '~. ~ Q) O N d~'~' O t` O tf)'.~ ~ O ~~ '. ', : te.- 0 ~ ~ i ~. .o ~ _C i ~ i. ~ U C Cfl r _ ~ ~ CO M;tj iM: ~N O'O:O ti CV! (D'CO (O N.Cy ir, O,, i M M i O' ~ ' N 'N I N ! ', ~, ~. I O H O '. O O o' I ~~. CA O O M ~~I o ~~' ~~I O ~'. O N,t~ N r~ r (O r OIL . Iln O M'~ CO M,~, O r M,COIIn. O N O O O ~ Cy ' I O ' O CD ' ~t C\j ' .-- ~~. r,rl~- N' '~r r..r d'. '. O ' M , N , . I O ! N ' ~j ', N ' I ' ~ M' (O O,- a~ ~ \ ~, c ~ O p ~ O ~ r.. O N~ N O O r M O _ ~ I r . V 00 O ~ In ' t~ ~I C) N O) O) D7 O CV ' tt") t1') (O OJ C~j ' a'N N, N N O CO O N o O O d7 Cf') c O O N I~ N t!7 ~ .- CO : r r ~ ~ O ti 00 O r ~ d~ LO . I~ ' CO ~j ~ N '. CO 00 ~ N (y tp '. l(j ' ~.!') ' M nj ~, ~. r r r r.. r r r,..M. ' r O N ', r ,. O N I (V r _ _ CO CO O ~ c CA O O) t.p o ,, O . _ N I~ N i N 1~ ' ' ' r (D r lf) ~ In ~~ ~ t`,~ ~'ln r N cr r'~ ~- N O' OO oD CO nj tp ~ tf) ' O nj O r O 'N I O ~'~ ~ ~ I rn,rn rn'~ ' O r N ~ CO ICn'~,r O. i N ',, Lb O of N ' ~ ~ tp OD ' I ~' r r r O' r r .-- N , I O. r - 'O , i i0 r' N N O COO N N O O r N O O O'O N '~. C1 . - , ' 00 N ~ , M M 7''.~' VI N ti r ~ ~~~ '~ A I ^ C ! N N N ~' ~ C N ~ N ~ ~ II II '- ~ 0 0 0 °o ~ o 0 0 °o ~ } ~ ~ -~ o, c c', ~,~ °- ~ N a~ .N .c ~jw~o, ' .~ ~w o an ~ c!U c c U 3 _ I a~ _o ', >~~ > c ~ o or > c ~ c ~ ' ~ v n mQ 0°¢ ~ '~ N E ~ Q ~ ca ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ QQ ~ p ~ j c ~ ~ ~ v ~ ~ ~ w ~.. ~ a ~ o O ', L ' ~ L , ' ~ -~ ~ Q Q E °~ 3 z ~ ~ '~, , r O ca !Z r..t 0 0 c:. ~. a ^~ ~1~/ ^~ V./ ~I ~I 3 ~--1 . r..~ ~I . ,.., 0 .~ U x C: C/1 C/~ r~ ~~1 a~ b~A U b~A . ,~, x ~L/ U . r-, ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r..~ 4~ ~ ~, 4~ ~/ O ~ ~ , 3 ;~ ~~ 4~ r..~ C~ 4~ r..~ C~ •~ •~ •~ ?, R' ~. ,~-z r .. ~ i. ~ ~_ ~i f Si ~ .:, O ~ •'" ~i ^ , NUS- W ~- c~ °o o° °o °o °o °o o° N N ~ T ~ ~ ~ 6F} ff? ffl Ef} G~ r..i C~ G~ 4~ b~ 4~ y L~ -: ~. c~ .. ~ .~ lfs ...~ i! ~ Gti f O O O O O O ~ O to O ~ tO~ ~~Npp N T T Efl D7 c~ nA e~ ~. ^~ a~ 0 U ~ ,.: :C :. •V ~I te) ~ A k ~ ~1 ~~ L ^~ `}W Q CO V O ^~~ i O U O ^~^` rWr^ /vJ W ~• 4 ^~^` rr~ vJ ^L^` J ^~ i ~~ f^~` W yMMti `V U O Q N Q L 4 cu L N O O O O O O O O O O ~ O ~ O _~ O_ ~ O c 0 ... ~. ea CL O C~ w , i .~ ~: '~ c~ Y,F;~.,r ~ \ W V I ~/ V~ V~ _ ~Y ~ : ~ •I , ~O `O ~ v> N ;~'~ `k~ M N M M ~+ Q .,; ~. ~r i a }~ ~~ ~a° ;~ ~r~¢ ~ ~, ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ L ~ r ~ . f ~ 0 0 ~ M ~ 4 ~ ~ N ~ ~.r~~,~ s _ ^ N ' ;rye.. ~ r~_, f . ~ ~ t s ~ 7 ' ~~ ff~ ..jly- f `, y'~~ t ~,~ ~ _ '~i~~ Lf::' ~ ~ ~r h u f t ~Y ~y ~ W , f ` ~ ; V O y T 't ~ ,~ f ~ `~~r J h ~I J ^ J 1~ ~ J 1~ fl ~ it'4 °~ ir.,u_ ~~ ~ .~ ~~ ~: ~ ~,:.; ~ 's' ~ ~•:* t ~~?_ .~ ~r r ~ ~ ,. _ ~i ~` ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :. ~ ~ ~ o ~ >+ ~ V U U ._ L ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ~ v '~ ~ ° ~ O _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , L/1 •,~ ~•I ~••~M 0 V •~ • ^I V w r- ~S.a L, ti 7 ~ T'~~" ~ H. ,CAS.': A ~._ § g g g g g ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ V M O ~ 00 ,-~ H ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~`- V V V V V L - ~,' ` \O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y :~. ~,~~ ~ r ~,~, ~ ,~ . ~ ~--+ ~ M ~ M ~ M ~ , ~~r„{~!! N~'1Cn * Y' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ s~~-~r ~. r F g g g g g ~ „ ~c ~.. ~ N ~ ~ +~ .. ~O ~ ~ O ~O ~ ~ N b~9~ N b~} M ~ N ~ M ~3- ..~ . ::4<. - 11'~~a r „~ r ~~ _~ ~, a • ~ V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o o ~ ~ a V ~ ~ U +~ ._ O ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ ? ° ~ v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `~ O .J ~ , U ~ ~ v~ i G~ r..i V r..~ r..i b~A . ^., r..i t/1 .,..i W -z C!~ r~ w.,l 0 0 0 a^~ 1 ~1 a~ U bA v a~ 0 • 4~ b.A 0 }, ~~'~ C/~ C!:} - o a ,--., ~ ,--~ ~ ~, ., ~. a,o a~ -; O ~ ~ t O ~ •~~~ 0 0 ~, ~ a, ~ o 04 c N ~-.~ I ' ~ .~} ~ I _ ~ I I~ t~.~. ~ 4~ , CCU ~ ~ 4~ 4~ '~ ^ ^ .~ ~-. C O v .~ 4~ ~..i V r..~ r..~ CCS b.A . ^., r..~ G/1 .,..i W 'l ?~ .~:_ .i ~ ~'. ~ L -n~ Vl L 3 ON 00 O ~ M p n ~ lND N Obi I~ ~ ~ OMi ,^-i ~' 0~0 N O~ M M d0 M M ~ M ,-i O 00 I~ ~D I~ O N In O~ d' Eft +-i N M Ln I~ O Ln +--i O~ t0 O ~ 1~ O M LA I~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ii4 iff +y N N M tD 00 *-~ Lf) 01 M 00 ~ tPr tf~ iPr ~ ~T ~ ,--i .-i ,-i N N' M ifs {~ ifs tff ifs ifs t0 Q~ lf1 O I~ LA O O O Ln r+ lD O .--~ Q1 I~ N O l(') CO I~ tD Ln M 00 I~ N ~O .--i tD ,--i I~ Ln N lp O I~ L!1 M O C I~ O O N O O N Ln LA ~ M N 01 I~ O ~D +--~ N M Ln CO +-~ ~ M .--~ M Ln ~-+ 1~ I~ N O C' M N ~} Eft ifs Eft ~- ,~ .--~ N M ~ Ln 01 N I~ N 01 Lf~ M .--~ tf~ ifl- ifs b~' Eft H4 4f~ .--i ri N N M ~ LA ifs ~ ifs ~ ifs Eft to ~_ ',~ ~ .v ~~ ~~ r-+ M O n O M M O O O O l0 j Q ~ ~ O ~ n O O ~ O •--~ to .--i tp ~f' .-i u") O ~t I~ O C ,--i .-~ .--i N M LA ~D +--~ ~--~ N N ~ lD 00 ~--~ ~ +--~ N N a° I ,, ~ ~ I v- p CCO O U ~~ ~ O ~ ,-r o0 00 p ,--i ~ O Q~ O 11') O .--~ LA +--i t0 ~ tr") O V' I~ O I O ,-~ ,--~ ,--i N v' in I~ ,--~ ,--i N N ~ lp oo .--~ .-i .--i N i~ _ ~;: V z_ r ;: .~~" ~' ;~ ' ~4 ~ . ' ~ / r `1 ' ~ ~ l ''~ ~`` ~S. f ~./ ~1 ~ n ~.J .~ . ~...~ W I O o . . ~~l S !r~ 4 4'~~ l11 'h F 11 1 I. I k .~, ~ ~~ ~ l ., ~ s^ ' T O °~ #„ ~ ~ . ~. ~~ /~ ~3~/ :, '~, ~ '„ . ~~ tt -~ N ~4: ~f o a _~ j a r ~~ . ~, , 1~ ~+ r' r ~ .} ~ ~+ ` } M ~ ,~k ~~ ~ a ~ o ~' ~ R O ~ 2L ~ ~ O ~ ~ ,~~ ~' ~ b.Jp ~ ~: . ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ '--~ O ~ .~ ~ r--~ v ~ c~ ~,,,~ O 4.) ~ ~ b,A ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~:. ^^i~ ' '~ 0 I ~ ~ ~ :, ~ ~. v~ ~ ~ • ~, r ~.., ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ r~~ ~ ~ ~~-+ I} .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I r--1 O s* ~ ~ ~ ~~~- • , x :; a~ ~~~ ~ . C/1 .~ r..i C~ .,.y ~I c 0 .., O i 0 ~--~ . O U '~ 4J 4~ V 1``~^) v r= CCU ~ ~ ~ ~ .O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ P,, ;~ti ~.. f d F .l, ~"~ ~= ~~~ ~ .~ ~ ~ r~ U L ~ ~° ` ~ ~' U ~'~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~. , 4~ N -~ : . ~ ~ ~ ~ a N C> ~ U ~ t , ~. Y • ~ ; y: , ~~~ C~, ~ o ~ `~ ' ~„~ ~ , .~ ,...., ~ ~ a~ . ~ ~ ~ c~- 4.~ +~`~ ~~ ~, ~ ~, _ ''~ ~; N ~ `'~ CCU ~ ~ ~ ~ C bap ~-' -~:. ~ p ~"' ~ O c~ ~--~ ~ ~ ,~ ~; 1. ~ ~. t ~~` ~, ~3; s ~~ ~ ~, 0 .., ¢, O w 0 0 ... ~. c~ ~, 0 U ~~ ~r ~~~' ~: 1 ,~:f, 4-: t'- ~_ ~: ~, a ri: r 7:: ] L ?~ ~, o ~ U ~ _~ ~~ ~ C ~ • ~ ~ ~-. N ~ U ~ N U Q _ ~ ~ O N Q •~ U ~ O _ ~$ V p) N ~ N ~ O Q ~ ~ O ~ ~ O N ~ ~ O ~ i ~ ~ U N •~ ~ % ~ U L ~ L N ~ ~ N ~. N ~ .-. i N N ~ N o p ~ p ~ ~ ~ ~ o~ o ~ ~ ~ U Q ~ ~ Q °~ U ~ b + + ~ L ?~ ~, o c~a U ~ ~ • ~ '~ _~ fn ~ _ ~ ~ ~ r~ r O U a Q. - ~ ~ ~ 3 {~ M Q _ ~ Q> ~ ~ E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~- C •~„ 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ O ~e ~ i ~ p U m ~- ~ ~ ~ U ~ i a cn ~ N p L 3 ~ i N N ~ L O ~ ~ L O ~ O N O) ~ U Q ~ ~ Q~ U v b + + ~ C~ 0 O 0 O ~ t" N L T V T /~ U .~~. Q~ tOA ~ O c~ ~ c~ ~ ~ N O ~ ~ ~ d.I ~ ~ o a~ c •~ ~ >. ~ a L = j ~ ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ o o ~ Ca a `~ O ~ ~ ~ .~ .N E o = a ~ ~ a ° ° + ~I ~..1 G~ V •~y 0^ ~M ~. c~ L 0^ T ,a^o Y/ o ~ ..rn1. V a~ ~ ~n T ~n T 1~ ~ ~.r~ uJ ~c/o~ ~aI _O O U ~ •L COO ~ OOO O ~ COO ~ N ~ ~ CEO CO ~ d' I~ CO CO C7 *- bF} E{} Et? K} ffl f!~ ff3 Ef? EF} ~ / V ~ ~ C~7 Om0 O N ~ ~ O O ~ ~,,, ~ E O O C O Ef3 C O Ef3 CO ~} ~ (f} ~ 6F? ~ bR O_ _O _ ~ ~} Ef? E!? .N ~ ~ N ~ N ~ ~ Ln i~ ~ I~ ~+ C ~ O ~ ~ ~ 00 ~ O) _ (~? _O ffl _O Efl ~ d3 ~ d4 1~ N ~ N t.C) ('~ 00 i~ r r N ~ O ~ O r ~ ~ r r ~ N 00 :., C ~ ~ CO T T T ~ 1_ A 1 .~ r Ei3 r Ef? r EF} T f!? T d4 r Ef3 N Ef? N Ef3 N fA .N N _ d ~ ~ O °o a1 ~ t (~ 0 3 Q. cn L ~ N ~ O d H N L' a' ~ ~ >, _ ~ 0 ~ a~ ~ Y a> ~, ~ ~= ~ a ~x ~ w _ 0 ~ r T ~ o a 0 N T ~ O n 0 °' ~ V L ~ 3 a, ~ ~= ~ 'X ~ w _ 0 ~ r T ~ O Q 0 N T *~ o n 0 ,~ i ~ '' a, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'x ~ w :a ~ T T ~ 0 Q 0 N r ~ 0 Q 0 rI1 4~ O r..~ . ~, r..~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ui o ~rMi \'/ Ef3 ff? ff? ^. II!F ,,,, . -. 0 0 0 M0M \'J Efl I aann 0 0 0 Sri N ff} aS ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 o Sri o Sri N T T EA ffl Efl ~a~e/N lenuud N C O L V a 0 as c W a~ 0 0 ... a~ 0 v a~ .a 0 .~ 0 0 3 F ~~ ^~ ~iI ^~ ~/ V 4~ 4~ .~..~ 0 .~ 0 :,, "~; , "E, ,~ L ~" , ~ , ^ , ,y~Rf,: ~. s .~...~ :~ ,;~ .~ C:~ _ yyY ~. _,q r "~ ~ ~Lt . r «`'~ _+~' S ~': a .,~ a~ cu- ~` ~~ ~: c~ ~ { ~ ~„ ~. ~ j a~ ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ ~:. ~ ~~ ~, 4 V! ~) ' ~ 'U' //~~ .,.y y. N • ry ~ v7 v ~ C O ~ ~.I W i~l U ~ cc, T • e) '~ Oq A. ~ ~ I~~y~y x ~ V~1 ~ G w Arc 41(D d 4a 0~ •~ ~ v A ~ ~° v° ~ ~ ~ ~ 0~ N_ _ 'i 4 E. 'iw., H - ~: ~.:. r~ _~ ?/3 ,_ i~ ~~ ,.?' r-t r-. ;~ ~ i`~ Lr' rr ~j do zW W ~o~ >~T ~ ~ U C3 z _Z UG ~ ~ O J ~ 3n`~b ~> z * ~~G 0 ~ •~ .~ ~ ~ ~ U w '~ y ~ ~ v +~ ;~ C}V ~ '~I ;~ h .N ~ ~ •~ ~ ~ ~ w Obi 4 ~ ~V .~, W 'r M r d ~ rn .~ v y ~ O~ z 0 ti '~ 4 h i O s v N O .~ '~ 0 i c a z d N _ (~ C \ S° O d ~M ~ N r r '~ m ` '~ ti o O ~ i y a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C~ +-.+ r~ oA ~~ //^^ ~I I~ ~ fr1 ~d v~Q"' ~ d ~ QI v V • ~ ~ ~ /~1~ /~1 `v •~ ~ •~ ~ y,,, ~ N O ~ ~ C O •>- ~y w i ~ l U ~ ^ , W ~ ~ • ; ~ ~ ~ v ~~ '~N ~ ~ ~ , L.I (,~ .5 ~ N Q N ^C i.i ~ w ~~ ~ O ~">N N wo C". b 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ cC -~ ~ N :~^ ~ > > i~ rn ~ v-~ ~o ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ o c ~ c~C y 3 ~ .~.~ ~ . ~ ~ Oi N ~ . ~ b y o +~ V A ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 1 , 2000 AGENDA ITEM: Report on 1999 Economic Development efforts and discussi~h of work plan for next year SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This time has been reserved for a w rk session with Economic Development to review the progress that has been made thus ar in the current fiscal year. The work session was postponed from the February 29 B and meeting. The report is attached and has been revised since the last meeting. Mr. Porter has also included a pro like to review with you. We weld finalize it after the work session. d work plan for the next fiscal year that we would any suggestions you have for the plan and will One significant item is the funding f~ but achievable undertaking, and the allocated funds on an as needed b site. We need to do this on a s leveraged. I am including this in m~ Cat will be required to carry this out. It is an aggressive staff is very enthusiastic about it. In the past we have psis to projects when we had a prospect ready for the rstematic basis so that the revenue stream can be budget request for your consideration at a later time. Submit d by: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE No. Yes Abs Approved () Motion by: Church Denied () Johnson _ _ _ Received () McNamara- _ _ Referred () Minnix _ _ _ To () Nickens _ _ ~! Ji ACTIVITY REPORT January -December 1999 Roanoke County Department of Economic Development The Department of Economic Development, Roanoke County, Virginia, Post Office Box 29800, Roanoke, Virginia prepared this document 24018-0798. For additional information, please contact our office at (540) 772-2069. Facsimile Number (540) 772-2030. http://www.co.roanoke.va.us/econdev . ; ,.. ~ .~ .~ 2/5 I. Introduction: Throughout 1999, the Department deployed its resources in pursuit of four goals: New Business Attraction • Business Retention & Expansion • Product Development • Travel & Tourism These goals are extensions of mandates specified in the "Vision for Roanoke County" (1995), the "1998 Community Plan," and the "Economic Development Strategy - 2000 and Beyond". The Department's mission remains as adopted in 1998: To serve as the principal County contact for prospective new and expanded business and industrial development within the Roanoke Valley, to evaluate related opportunities, and to encourage tourism and all forms of economic development. The total volume of industrial, office, and commercial development projects was 754,231 square feet. This reflects a decrease of about 40% as measured by the average activity during the past three years (Table 1). Seventeen of the 31 projects were commercial ventures. Only one large industrial project (Kroger) was completed during the year (Table 2). During the year, 15 projects in Roanoke County were announced -nine new businesses, four expansions, and two retention initiatives. The total estimated investment is $32.8 million up from $19 million in 1998. The results include the creation of approximately 360 jobs (Table 3). Public private partnerships were used to support 10 projects in 1999 (Table 4). A total of $1,416,008 of public private partnership funds were committed or expended during the year. II. New Business Attraction: We handled 176 inquiries during the year. Of these 97 (55%) were generated by the Department (Table 5). These include leads developed through contacts with local businesses that wanted our services or support. Real estate consultants and developers provided 32 leads. The Roanoke Valley Economic Development Partnership (RVEDP)/Virginia Economic Development Partnership (VEDP) was the source of 47 inquiries (27%). In light of our $112,500 contribution, this represents a cost per lead of almost $2,400. We were able to turn 108 of the inquiries into live prospects. We count as prospects those who actually come to Roanoke County to explore opportunities or those with whom we interact on substantive issues. Of the 108 prospects, 16 made a relocation or expansion decision favorable to Roanoke County. We carried 56 prospects into CY-2000 for further development. The remaining are deemed inactive. ~j ~ 3/5 Department staff attended three recruiting events in conjunction with the RVEDP: • Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) trade show -Detroit -April • Bio-99 Exposition- Seattle, Washington -June • Communications Technology Industry Association (CTIA) trade show -New Orleans - February III. Business Retention & Expansion: The Department visited SO local businesses in 1999. Only businesses with 10 or more employees are targeted. Topics for discussion include market and business trends, future expansion or relocation plans, and staffing/training requirements. The Department is looking for opportunities to provide assistance and support that insures the client's retention and prosperity in the County. We provide the following types of assistance: - Ombudsman Services - Worker Availability and Training Needs - Financing Opportunities - Export Development - Marketing and Trade Show Development - Demographic Information on Roanoke County and Roanoke Valley - Public Private Partnership Assistance - Identification of Sites and Buildings for Expansion IV. Product Development: Developing an inventory of quality industrial and commercial sites and buildings remains a formidable challenge (Table 6). Although the number of available sites and total acreage is up significantly from where it was five years ago, few are ready to go. We have taken several initiatives to better position the County for future market demand. The most notable of these are listed below: - Center for Research and Technology (CRT): We began construction on 4,400 feet of water line and 1,000 of sewer line. Anew park entrance with signage is being designed and engineered. It is expected that we will be able to break ground for the Center's first tenant by September 2000. - McDonald Farm: Roanoke County and the Town of Vinton have formed a partnership to develop as a Planned Technology District on a 100 acre site in northeast County. A preliminary concept plan and rezoning have been completed. Engineering for the extension of water and sewer to the site and road construction are planned for early 2000. - Montvale Industrial Park: A consortium including Roanoke County, the City of Roanoke, the City of Salem, and Bedford County was formed to explore the feasibility of locating a regional industrial park on one of several large sites (250-400 acres) in Bedford County. It is expected that feasibility studies will be completed by mid 2000. ~-2 4/5 - Virginia's First Regional Industrial Facilities Authority: The Authority is a regional economic development organization formed to develop a 1,050 acre business/industrial park (New Century Commerce Park) in Pulaski, Virginia. The County will participate by purchasing 10,000 shares in the development over the next ten years at the rate of $27,500 per year. The Chairman of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors and the Director of Economic Development serve on the Authority's Board of Directors. There are a couple of things we can do in 2000 to improve the marketability of our inventory. The first is to make sure our road requirements are included in VDOT's six-year construction plan. The second is to schedule water and sewer extension projects in the County's capital improvement budget. The challenge for the new millennium is to continue to add new commercial and industrial sites to the inventory and to improve the existing commercial corridors within the County. Further redevelopment and infill of the Route 419 and Route 220 corridors will enhance the commercial attractiveness of Southwest County. V. Tourism and Travel: State taxes generated from tourism and travel in 1998 were $520 million. The Roanoke Valley generated $10.9 million, of which $2.3 million was Roanoke County's share. Roanoke County's supports this economic development engine on two fronts. First the County is a contributing member ($112,500) of the Roanoke Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau (RVCVB). The Director of Economic Development and Director of Parks and Recreation serve on the RVCVB Board of Directors. The County also directly sponsors or otherwise supports an array of tourist- related events including the following: - Virginia's Explore Park: This year marked an eventful fifth season at Virginia's Explore Park which hosted an estimated 100,000 visitors. Roanoke County contributed $170,000 to the Park's 1999-2000 budget while the State provided $400,000. Roanoke County, the National Park Service, and other area organizations are jointly planning the development of an Interpretative Center on the site. This facility will create an attractive tourist destination with exhibit space that presents the history of the Blue Ridge Parkway and the Virginia mountain country through which it passes. Federal funds totaling $850,000 have been approved for design and construction. Grants totaling $100,000 has been obtained from the Regional Competitiveness Act. The County has appropriated $330,000 in its 2000 budget for this project. - Hanging Rock Battlefield and Railway Preservation Foundation: Roanoke County participates with the City of Salem and various Civil War, historic, and railway groups in preserving this tradition. Development staff completed a Phase I Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) grant on behalf of the Hanging Rock Battlefield and Railway Preservation Foundation for the construction of trails and greenways. ..~. 5/5 - Trebark Archery Shooters Association Pro/Am Tournament: The three-day event was held at Smith Mountain Lake in June. Approximately 10,000 people attending the event, which included 1,000 archers from 35 states. - Misc. Sporting/Special Events: • Commonwealth Games • NCAA Division III Amos Alonzo Stagg Bowl • NCAA Division III Basketball Final Four Tournament • The Roanoke Valley Horse Show. • The Roanoke Symphony Volunteer Association Polo Match • Virginia's "Ed and Sandy Lee" Rugby Tournament • Governor's Conference on Greenways and Trails VI. Overview of the Activities of the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County The Authority was active in 1999 in the following areas: - Negotiated with Salem Vent International and Lincra USA to purchase sites within Valley TechPark. The successful location of these companies on the remaining tracts of land will complete the industrial park project. - Completed Stage II grading improvements in Valley TechPark. The Authority oversaw $731,600 in public funds for the completion of geotechnical and grading activities to allow for the future Stage II expansion of R.R. Donnelley & Sons' four-color printing facility in Valley TechPark, which according to the Performance Agreement is scheduled for completion by December 31, 2000. - Issued an inducement resolution for $4,800,000 of Industrial Revenue Bonds on behalf of Dragon Chemical Corporation for the acquisition, construction and equipping of their manufacturing facility within the shell building at Valley Gateway Business Park. Bond closing is scheduled for April 2000. - Issued an inducement resolution for $7,000,000 of Industrial Revenue Bonds on behalf of Salem Vent International for land acquisition, equipping and construction of a manufacturing facility at Valley TechPark. Bond and property closing will occur by the end of February 2000. - The Industrial Development Authority assisted the Department of Community Development with the implementation of the Williamson Road mini-grant program for landscaping, signage and facade improvements by "passing through" grant funds for these purposes to eligible businesses. The Authority reviewed and approved four grants totaling $12,577.60 in 1999. - The Authority had oversight over the close out of the Garman Road relocation project for The Kroger Co., by assisting in negotiations with County East LLC to obtain a sight distance easement so that the new road would be eligible for acceptance by the Virginia Department of Transportation. ~' APPENDIX-I 1999 Economic Development Staff Timothy W. Gubala, CED, EDFP Director (resigned effective 01-14-00) David R. Porter Director (appointed 01-04-00) Joyce W. Waugh, CED Assistant Director Melinda J. Cox Economic Development Specialist Brian T. Hamilton Economic Development Specialist (vacant) Program Support Specialist Susie B. Owen, CPS Former Program Support Specialist (reassigned 10-31-99) z APPENDIX-II Professional Affiliations, Memberships, and Directorships American Economic Development Council Southern Economic Development Council National Council for Urban Economic Development American Chamber of Commerce Research Association Virginia Economic Developers Association Ninth District Development Financing, Inc. Virginia's First Regional Industrial Facilities Authority Virginia Asset Financing Corporation Roanoke Valley-Alleghany Regional Commission (St" PDC), Regional Economic Development Alliance Roanoke Valley Economic Development Partnership Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County Coalition for the Blue Ridge Parkway Miss Virginia Pageant Archery Roanoke Valley, Inc. Roanoke Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau Roanoke Valley Preservation Foundation Virginia Preservation Alliance Western Virginia Land Trust New Century Technology Council Total Action Against Poverty, MicroEnterprise Loan Fund Advisory Committee Association for the Preservation of Civil War Sites Hanging Rock Battlefield and Railway Preservation Foundation Wildlife Habitat Council Virginia Trails International Association of Administrative Professionals 1999 ACTIVITY REPORT Table 1 History of Development Activity (all figures in square feet) :.:: :;:. :.,::.::.v..u.....:'..... ::.::.~::: r ::::................. :di -,-: --~:::.::... v n.Y•F•ii:i............................ \........... ....... :.:..r::::::. .:... ................ ................................... . ............ i:{~i$iiiii': 1989 337,513 615,738 93,260 1,046,511 1990 501,555 228,102 52,313 841,970 1991 253,138 234,955 74,168 562,261 1992 87,380 138,993 71,120 297,493 1993 56,201 206,825 128,830 391,856 1994 578,440 189,006 84,979 852,425 1995 173,782 222,486 210,169 606,486 1996 799,600 192,174 276,103 1,258,877 1997 761,639 117,631 562,288 1,441,558 1998 452,488 286,964 495,834 1,235,286 1999 284,340 116,754 353,137 754,231 TOTAL 4,286,076 2,549,628 2,402,201 9,288,954 Table l:History of Development Activity in Sq. Ft. 1,soo,ooo 1,400,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 E~ Indusrial ®Office !~ Commercial ~ Total 7-°- 2 1999 ACTIVITY REPORT Table 2 Development Projects PLANS 1st Security Storage 69,280 Brabant Research 22,000 1~` Team -Daewoo 2,000 BRP Interpretive Center 9,000 Synchrony 9,000 Plantation Dev. P-I 3,600 Williams Scotsman 7,750 Time Machine 3,000 VA Varsity Transfer PII 34,000 ::~.< •~n4•.l viii'`v:YLi:~~:uiii~i:::{iiii<+<{+ii .\.. v.\vv::::::::::.~m. vv. ~~i•ivx.~.. ~ a „}, ~~aaa»»~~ ((.. }~~YYaa i'J~Rifc~RJtli~l~i`lill ti'liC>.{S, }`:3j$>jlM1l>'{ L:t~:ivi>.'vnv'v:{'L?Y`:i w.vv.~.v •: w: • :••.w:::.v y ~~~~yyy.. . .~'~fJ.SI'::::y. :'w:V ..~.. ii lllililill~i~~:ilLViiili l~:l <2lC`v:tiliT:•iii~lll li+lili• :l:^'~L::i::S~l'~.$:~Y~}:u+::ll:S,:,+.:~::::~:?:ii:::ti~~ijiii:i:~'r,:;'r,: ................. ii .~n:::::::::::v.v :..:.. ::. ~:.4:v::v::nw :;vii . is .::::v..::::::.• ......:::.. ::................i?ii•i?iiiiiii-:•}.{n:~i•: i::: N:...:;,;:::: y,. . ...~........... PERMITS Carter Machinery 14,000 Plantation Development 3,790 PLAID Printing 5,783 LC Lincra 11,600 McVitty Executive 54,575 Goodyear Tire/ Speedy 11,078 Park Lube Southeastern Optical 4,050 Roanoke Athletic Club 10,000 PDR, Inc. 3,932 Expansion R & L Carriers 52,160 Walgreens 15,120 Valley Centre BP PII 14,000 (continued on next page) -~ 1999 ACTIVITY REPORT Table 2 (con't) Development Projects COMPLETIONS Kroger 100,000 Carilion Brambleton 33,269 Arby's - Brambleton 3,080 Center Cleaner World 3,264 Cycle Center # 31,000 Design Countertops 9,400 Funtastics 29,000 Lowe's # 135,00 0 VA Varsity Transfer P-1# 24,000 Valley Centre BP P-I 12,000 ...~.,, <~ ::. ~k:.:;.}`:.Ca ?r>:^ ••,: ~,,.a i, rig ,;..i[1.:::>.,t;?.«;::~::i:: '.~ l.:"%?`<<~>?•.`: <E'•E>'• ~E.:~l..:s'% E.~~`:;LE}t8~`:~'~~~~?~tti`t<>s>?z~>'''<'?> `~.:;;''.%`:t:::~~ ..245 744.. ..a ................ . Table 2: Development Projects in Sq. Ft. 800,0 700,0 600,0 500,0 400,Oi 300,Oi 200,Oi 100,01 Plans Permlt Complete 1999 Total 1998 Total 1997 Total D Industrial ®Office/Medical ®Commercial/Retail /~--2 Cam~"//' FBI O ~.a// W M .C e~ b V c 0 C C H r.+ V .O L ~ ~: • ~ s o ' fN> N" 0 o O O o o O o 0 0 ,:: .-~~ > ~~•:' z s O .-. ,~ . . s: : .., : : : ^': n' ~~ ~'•.;?MC:,`~y~i'h;.r N • '~ O N ~ Qk" O O O ~" N O ~ ¢ N : . : , : N :: :i b ': bD :::-0R• ~ 4 ld 00 • 4 d N ~C CC R! Cp F. R~ U Op . ~ y tr :;:~~ . : 4+:f;5,{; . y :;.,,.3t~;. C~ x~?i ~ v ~ ~ z a~ z ~ a~ z ~, z ~ a~ z a~ z ~ ~ ~ ~ <..~,~_..,;;•::~:`# ;. a z k ~ o a a . < ~:;;. ~<:~> ':~!Jrr.'?: ¢ 0 O O ~ O N ~ ~ ~ O ~ ¢ O y ~ rsrri~ •r:': •.:•.:':;'.' 0 , *+, J :'',r : ~~. r;. :.;p ~ k .. , },y :.'tail+~~ ~ N O :~: <~~•~~• ~'~~>` z z ~'~''i ' st<: •% O:yx:}Y~:y.; ~:..Y7 •: J~~ .~j~ y ti N o" U b ny s.. Uq N x t•. U ~^ y U 4., O ~ ~ U «+ y N a, y U +..+ U U :'s:::i~:~::::: ~ :s;::• ~ ~ ~ ob a~ :: . o U ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~, od' +..• a o U a~ on ~ o q v y o ., ~.. c Q~ ^ ~ H ~ co v G U o . Q 7 U G y a C G n N N .J ~ O s Op .. ~ ~+ G o D O _ _ ~ ~ i " _ +~ N > ~ O ' ^d ,,,, a U /1 N { . ' F. U N O O .^1. Q O H W Q W O U ~ ) v H Q ~ a U F. C7 ~ C W ~ . <'{'>'? b y. O ~ :£F. K:%%~ri °' a ~ a, 4. ~ U v v ~ u ~ en c~ w a c~ • O ~ .'~ «"+ ~ N d ~ C .a U U ~. O r A cS + ~ O _ : ~: N m C/7 H U ~• ~ ~ {y, C _ :...`M ~ :~::~: ~; s ~y .~ L v~ U G .~ U ~ ti S •~ a y C rn O x 'vi y <:: ~ ~ .D ~ 0 oU U C Ri Q1 ~ U U ~ U ~ Q 5~" F2i'3'i'??i• yy ~~ b FYi w F. m cd U N o ti, a ~ Q -+ ~ T H > , 3 o, a ~ ~ ::<::~:;<:;:::;>:::;>;::: .~ a a> a w .~.i a a U ~_ 1999 ACTIVITY REPORT Table 4 Public Private Partnerships ~.<..:.: 22tYi2..: :} :.:.,,.::...:. ..:::• :Y.r. ::<: ., x{<:><:: • k' \. "tt2 : S: .. u1:{• :.:.{.:. :. :: Lv.?nx.:. n.:... .: .,:y::: • :k : ::: Y ::::::::::>:;<::<:::: <;~::~;<Y:,: >. . ~~~y~: riy~~ ~y' .»vv.:v: ::v.:v.\•. •.:Y:•.v.»v.:•'•.\:~:.:..::::u..•.:. y::x.., .n..;.; y;:;..~ n:}vv.~:y:; yq::..•.: : :; ....... .: ... ..:.vw::n\•n'r:.f}R.}iv:.::.xy j •~Y~Y.t ~ ..v:...::::..n::. .. x.. .: \bt:.:: \.::v •. :\: •. ~> iYtiii • •: i • : LU ` v.:.:..:.::.:::;.n:.w:: n.;:•.;:. ..:.. n:.•y.•.. :..:..: :: nx:::: }; ..;;v:: ::t.>:.t •.~::: :'~: S.'., ... ;. : p lJ:{: ~tvilll ~• ~ •:i• v: }i•:.:i. ; :::::..... .:.: ::::..: •...::: {~.:.:v.: ~itii: x•: . y~ ::5~;::::i;::::: .. i.:,.: ;:}i:•i;x;:vv.:x.::•:::~ ;.yn::: }; .:; n :..:2.:.....::.xm.:......::nn....; v..yvy.;i:::'.{.:$+:Y •.va•nv:w :•nvm::•; .::::..:::. .•r. . :.: . : :: .v.:v: ::v. :.. . w : } ..... . ~. .. k:.:: :o:.:: }:l::tii:iiiiiG •.~ p :::{is:•:::•:::::.w.v:.::vk•.:w.:::•: n:• x:ttiCK:..4: \: >.xY.n:iii:::yv.Y:.:~::x.:.:...::....:::.: ~:.::::w::::w::.vv.:•:::;::::, :ti.:ti:.h• :J • . :i •n •.vi{:{'{{,iYYi{:Y:,^.,'''">+'.•i>+i:,>.~ti•:iti{iij:vk::: ii•: n : :.............. * t } } } :•: . i i:4:ii::iijv;.•::::::::::•: `.v.: > ' ? t .S`...y..}; •.}}:.:.•.:y}}:^:?i: T:iii:•:~::•i:`:6::•:•:?':: i:•ii:•::•iiii:8:•:-ii:•`ii •` ::::::.:... .. t..:..:v...... ....................::'::. ..4. . nv.:v..v.::;::ta•::v:.v.:w: nv,:.:.:•:•i:•:iii?;y;ii?Ci.:::.:•;:::: •,v,::•::::.:::v.:vvv :'•i'. ::..........................:v....::•i:'ti:::::':........ ::.:tLu:.}:J:?Gi:::.ti{i:4:•:4i:!•: ?:::.:u..::? :.:..::::::::: :•: R ::.~::::;.:.......................:. n.:.....ti iit• •:: .C:..i:ti iii.':'{':•::•::+. ::<:iiy::.1::;:::•.:i ': Advance Auto** (R,X,F) $641,500 $10,000,000 $641,500 Carter MachineryBranch**(X,F) 280,600 4,000,000 280,605 Dragon Chemical Corp.** (F) 217,900 4,750,000 217,893 Lincra, USA, INC. ** (S) 33,500 1,060,000 33,476 Plantation Development, LLC(F) 5,570 450,000 5,570 R + L Carrier** (R) 40,000 3,000,000 90,000 RUSCO (T) 14,363 531,902 14,363 Salem Vent International** (F) 155,500 7,000,000 155,503 Synchrony** (F) 17,000 520,000 16,959 VA Varsity Transfer P-II (S) 10,155 1,000,000 10,155 ~«„<> :.. ti..t:::...a:.:•.:.•..:0•:. ::: :..::•:......: :...:.: •..•.•::::.:::.::..:.....::•.:•...:..•::::...:.::::::::::.:•::.. ~..•.:.. ~a :.::..::: • :::::...:..:r:.x ~'Y .':, :: Note: *Commitment, no construction * *Denotes total payback from one to five years ~.-~~ 2 1999 ACTIVITY REPORT Table 5 New Business Attraction Total Inquiries 176* Total Prospects 108** *Inquires are those companies that contact tlus office for assistance. (This is the first step.) **Prospects are those companies that have gone beyond inquiry st<1tus. This office has either visited the prospect's present facility or the prospect has visited available sites and/or buildings in the Roanoke Valley. Also, the staff may have sent a proposal for expansion/location assistance. O 27% ® 54 ,,, ®VEDP/RVEDP ®R. County ~ Realtors/Developers D Consultants/Other Table 5: Origin of Inquiries & Prospects 1999 ACTIVITY REPORT Table 6 Inventory of Commercial and Industrial Sites and Buildings 1994 2000 Industrial site acres 5-10 10 17 11-25 10 12 26-50 2 10 51-100 1 9 101+ 5 3 TOTAL 28 (1,375 acres) 51 (2,163.79 acres) Commercial site acres 1-2 9 27 2.1-5 14 16 5.1-10 12 18 10.1-24.9 10 14 25+ 2 5 TOTAL 47 (acres N/A) 80 (559.12 acres) Industrial buildings (in total square feet) 1 (6,500) 8 (196,850) Commercial buildings (in square N/A 31 (254,396) feet) ~' ---DRAFT--- Roanoke County Business Plan FY 2001 Department Name: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT [revised-03/10] "PREAMBLE" Economic development is the process by which society's major public and private institutions use the market place and government policy to make new economic investments that create additional per capita wealth for citizens of all economic levels. Wealth creation occurs most efficiently and equitably when public and private individuals and enterprises are actively encouraged and enabled to seek new economic opportunity and to productively use their resources in ways that add economic value to the community. Mission• To design and implement innovative economic development programs and services that leverage community assets, create wealth and prosperity, and embrace the region's future. Goals• 1. MARKETING & BUSINESS RECRUITMENT (15%) 2. PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (40%) 3. BUSINESS RETENTION & EXPANSION (20%) 4. WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT (5%) 5. COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT (10%) 6. TOURISM & SPECIAL EVENTS (5%) 7. ORGANIZATIONAL MANAGEMENT (5%) ---DRAFT--- Roanoke County Business Plan FY 2001 Department Name: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (1) [revised-03/10] Mission• To design and implement innovative economic development programs and services that leverage community assets, create wealth and prosperity, and embrace the region's future. Goal-1: MARKETING & BUSINESS RECRUITMENT (15%) - To attract to the region quality jobs and investments that diversify the economy, broaden the tax base, and provide long-term employment opportunities. - To attract to the region 5000 new jobs of which at least (50%) are primary* or family-wage... [Target Date -June 2005) - To attract to Roanoke County and/or to the jurisdiction of its JV partners 2000 new jobs of which SO% are primary or family-wage... [Target Date -June 2005) - To attract to Roanoke County$300, 000, 000 worth of new investment of which 60% will come from industrial or Class-I commercial development, and 40% from Class- II commercial or retail development... [Target Date -June 2005) - To increase to 20% that portion of Roanoke County's assessed valuation attributable to industrial and commercial real estate... [Target Date -June 2005) - To restructure incentives in ways that favor the development of industries in target sectors and the creation of primary and/ or family wage jobs... [Target Date - September 2000) *NOTE: "Primary" jobs are defined as those the output of which (product or service) is exported or consumed outside the region. "Family Wage" jobs are those that pay at least $10 per hour with a 20+% benefits package. [03/10] PRODUCT ENHANCEMENT (2) - To identify in Roanoke County or the jurisdiction of its partners 8-10 sites with the greatest market potential/appeal and focus resources on upgrading them to "deliverable "status. - To establish viable real estate development partnerships with other jurisdiction and private developers. - To establish a consortium of key stakeholders to identify, develop, and market quality sites. - To educate members of the commercial/industrial real estate and development communities about the Department's marketing and client management strategies. - To minimize unnecessary clearing and grading of industrial/commercial sites to preserve their natural character and beauty. - To encourage the development of greenways, bike trails, pedestrian paths, and other amenities at all sites in the inventory. - To encourage the reuse, redevelopment, and occupancy of the current inventory of commercial/industrial buildings and sites. - To encourage speculative building on selected sites. - To establish development partnerships with the private sector. ~2 Roanoke County Business Plan FY 2001 Department Name: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (3) [revised-03/10] To design and implement innovative economic development programs and services that leverage community assets, create wealth and prosperity, and embrace the region's future. Goal-3: BUSINESS RETENTION & EXPANSION (20%) - To create and maintain a regional business climate that encourages the retention and growth of local enterprise. O - To create/retain in Roanoke County 1000 new jobs, at least 60% of which are primary* or family wage... [Target Date -June 2005J. - To identify at least 30 "at risk businesses "and take appropriate action to insure that they remain viable County enterprises... [Target Date -June 2003) *NOTE: "Primary" jobs are defined as those the product or service output of which is exported or consumed outside the region. "Family Wage" jobs are those that pay at least $10 per hour with a 20+% benefits package. r ~,~ ---DRAFT--- Roanoke County Business Plan FY 2001 Department Name: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (4) [revised-03/10] ion: To design and implement innovative economic development programs and services that leverage community assets, create wealth and prosperity, and embrace the region's future. Goal-4: WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT (5%) - To attract and maintain a quality inventory of skilled labor sufficient to meet market demand in target industries. - - To develop and disseminate a profile of the anticipated labor market demand in target industries over the next three (3) years... [Target Date -December 2000) - To upgrade the skills of under-employed persons in the region to prepare them for jobs in target industries... [150 per year over the next five year) - To attract to the region new workers with target industry skills... [ISO per year over the next five years) - To create viable target industry employment opportunity in the region for at least 80% of those who successfully complete a qualified workforce development program. .G Roanoke County Business Plan FY 2001 Department Name: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (5) [revixed-03/10] Micsinn To design and implement innovative economic development programs and services that leverage community assets, create wealth and prosperity, and embrace the region 's future. COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT (10%) - To increase the community's willingness to embrace and its capacity to integrate economic development programs and projects. Objectives: - To meet with or otherwise promulgate the economic development story to each of the region's major civic, fraternal and community groups on a semiannual basis. - To establish mechanisms/process where by 100 interested (cognizant) members of the community can regularly interact with or otherwise participate in local economic development initiatives...[Target Date -April 2001 J. - To establish and maintain a cadre of 25-30 economic development ambassadors who are well equipped to promote the region... [Target Date - June 2001 J - To establish and maintain an economic development roundtable that includes the region's key business leaders...[Target Date -October 2000) ~~ COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT (5) [03/10] - To publish a newsletter. - To schedule regular outreach by Department staff. - To develop community awareness brochure and/or multi-media presentation. - To energize citizen advisory boards. - To upgrade the Department's website. - To showcase the Department's programs and accomplishments on a quarterly basis. - To schedule monthly executive breakfast briefings. • ---DRAFT--- Roanoke County Business Plan FY 2001 Department Name: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT [revised-03/14] "PREAMBLE" • Definition• Economic development is the process by which society's major public and private institutions use the market place and government policy to make new economic investments that create additional per capita wealth for citizens of all economic levels. Wealth creation occurs most efficiently and equitably when public and private individuals and enterprises are actively encouraged and enabled to seek new economic opportunity and to productively use their resources in ways that add economic value to the community. Mission• To design and implement innovative economic development programs and services that leverage community assets, create wealth and prosperity, and embrace the region's future. Goals• (Assets I1. MARKETING & BUSINESS RECRUITMENT (25%) 2. PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (20%) 3. BUSINESS RETENTION & EXPANSION (30%) 4. WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT (5%) 5. COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT (10%) 6. TOURISM & SPECIAL EVENTS (5%) I7. ORGANIZATIONAL MANAGEMENT (5%) *Percentage of total assets in the Department's administration & marketing budgets (excluding contributions). It does not include funds allocated to the PPP or CCI budget. *. . . Action No. Item Number ~ - 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 14, 2000 AGENDA ITEM: Discussion of Fire and Rescue response and reaction times COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Overall, I am pleased with the operation of the combined career/volunteer system that we have. However, there are several areas of concern that Chief Burch and I are working on. The increase in demand for rescue calls is placing a severe hardship to the entire system. We need additional career staff to cover times when we are unable to get volunteer coverage. The cost of operating some of our stations is unusually high because of the low volume of calls. With the new computer system, we can produce these reports on a monthly basis. We are also going to begin analyzing these calls to see if the responses can be improved by working regionally with other localities. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Included in the Board's agenda packet are the results of a study completed by Roanoke County Fire and Rescue on the 1999 responses, no responses and average reaction times, countywide and by company or squad. We are in the process of creating a Quality Assurance Team to analyze responses, no responses and reaction times on a quarterly basis. This will insure that we take a more focused look at the details of each response, determine the cause of any no responses or slow response/reaction times and formulate a solution. FISCAL IMPACT: None Submitted by: Approved by: -rc.Q c...(_ ~ Richard E. Burch, Jr. `" Elmer C. Hodge Chief, Fire and Rescue County Administrator t ~~ ACTION Approved () Motion by: Johnson Denied () Church Received () McNamara Referred () Minnix To () Nickens cc: File Richard E. Burch, Jr., Chief VOTE No Yes Abs ~_3 Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Department ~, ~~ RFS~ ~~G A~t~,~ RTE`/ Department Overview 2000 Presented By: Chief Richard E. Burch, Jr. " D O~ POANps.~ ti ~ ~ A z c~ ~ 2 • °v a 1838 C~n~xxt~~ ~~ ~~~xz~a~e FIRE AND RESCUE DEPARTMENT March 14, 2000 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors: RICHARD E. BURCH, JR. CHIEF The Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Department is pleased to present the results of a study recently completed on the responses, no responses, and reaction times for our department. It has taken us many months to compile the statistics needed to generate this overview. The time was worthwhile; this information will help us with our strategic planning and with the possible national accreditation process. On behalf of the department, I would like to thank the Board of Supervisors and County administration for the opportunity to share this overview with them and the citizens of • Roanoke County. It is with the interest and participation from the entire county that this department will continue to grow and fulfill its Mission Statement: "Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Department provides the highest level of professionalism and service in partnership with the citizens and visitors of the Roanoke Valley through a committed effort by the organization to safety and quality." Sincerely, ~~~ ~ ~~~_ Richard E. Burch, Jr. Chief 3568 PETERS CREEK ROAD NW • ROANOKE, VA 24019 • (540) 561-8100 FAX: (540) 561-8108 • EMAIL: rburchC~co.roanoke.va.us ®Recycled Paper Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview • Presented March 14, 2000 By Chief Richard E. Burch, Jr. • Executive Summary Roanoke County Countywide Totals • Pages per Station: Vinton Fire Department Station Overview Company 2 Number of Responses Vinton Rescue Squad Number of No Responses Rescue 2 Average Reaction Times Cave Spring Fire Department Company 3 Cave Spring Rescue Squad Rescue 3 Catawba Fire Department Company 4 Hollins Fire Department Company 5 Hollins Rescue Squad Rescue 5 Mount Pleasant Fire Department Company 6 Mount Pleasant Rescue Squad Rescue 6 • Clearbrook Fire Department Company 7 Clearbrook Rescue Squad Rescue 7 Bent Mountain Fire Department Company 8 Bent Mountain Rescue Squad Rescue 8 Fort Lewis Fire Department Company 9 Fort Lewis Rescue Squad Rescue 9 Mason s Cove Fire Department Company 10 Catawba/Mason's Cove Rescue Squad Rescue 10 Back Creek Fire Department ~" _ Company 11 ., Back Creek Rescue Squad ~ } ~; <_ ,w~`~ Rescue 11 • w._,_.. _ .~.W__ . ___,. __.~..._ .... ~__._.._,___~...~r Read Mountain Fire Department Company 12 Read Mountain Rescue Squad Rescue 12 Executive Summary Introduction This overview covers calendar year 1999 in which we had a total of 13,763 responses. ?6% of these responses were EMS and the remaining 24% were fire. The data is broken down by individual company or squad, but also takes a countywide look at our public safety program. We researched our responses, no responses, and reaction times. This information is based on responses rather than incidents which provide more factual account of response activity by station. When looking at this overview, it is important to remember that Vinton, Cave Spring, Fort Lewis and Hollins Fire and Rescue represent approximately 66% of the total calls for the county and have a significant affect on the results of this study. Our busiest station had 3,013 total responses and our slowest station had only 164. This clearly demonstrates the diversity in the challenges that we face when trying to develop a comprehensive plan that addresses the needs of the citizens in all of our response territory. Background • The data gathered is pertinent to determine where we have reaction response issues or lack of response, and in what areas of the county these occur. As an emergency services provider, this is critical to insure that we have personnel and vehicles placed strategically to enable a timely response. National statistics show that rapid response is essential in the final outcome in emergency situations, whether fire or medical. Procedures In November of 1998, a new CAD (Computer Aided Dispatch) system was put into operation. This has given us the opportunity to collect more data than we've ever been able to do in the past. A consultant was hired to assist in gathering the information contained in this new system by company or squad. A detailed report was assembled on the following: • Responses -the number of times each fire and/or rescue station actually goes on calls. A single incident may have a single or multiple responses. This applies to structure fire calls where the two closest fire companies and the closest rescue squad are sent, thus creating three responses in the CAD system to one incident. • No Responses -each call is entered into the CAD system and the • recommended response is generated. This is then shown as a dispatched call for the recommended company and/or squad. A "no response" occurs when no unit from the dispatched • company or squad actually goes on the call. There are various reasons for this: o Multiple calls -one unit from the dispatched company or squad is already on a previous call and a unit is still at the station with no staffing available (currently CAD only goes by units housed at each company or squad, it does not distinguish between staffed and un-staffed units). o Cancelled calls -before the unit from the dispatched company or squad can respond, the call is cancelled by the dispatch center. o Staffing unavailable -simply not enough people available to take any unit from the dispatched company or squad. o Stations dispatched to stand by at the building with no actual vehicle response, ie: a 10-89 or bomb scare as fire and rescue stands by and awaits for police to advise or assist another crew with a medic when this person is picked up at the station • Reaction Times -the amount of time in seconds from when the call is dispatched in the computer to when a unit from the company or squad marks en-route via radio and this traffic is entered into the CAD system. Currently, emergency calls are dispatched to the closest station. After six minutes if no unit has responded, the second closest station is dispatched. The first due station receives a "reaction" if they still respond as does the second due station. The second due station clock starts when they are dispatched. If one or the other does not send a unit a "no response" is shown. This report can henceforth be accessed on a monthly basis to provide a current and on-going look at responses, no responses, and reaction times. Recent turnover in our staffing has delayed this information. With the corrections in place, it is our intention to utilize the information provided by the system in the future to keep our service levels at their highest. Results Through the study of the reported information, we have been able to determine several key points: • Our busiest day of the week is Friday and our slowest day of the week is Sunday. • • 17% (2,290) of our total dispatches were "no responses", keeping in mind the • reasons a "no response" can occur. • Our busiest hour is from 5:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. and our slowest hour is from 3:00 a.m. to 4:00 a.m. • In analyzing our reaction times, we determined that from 12:00 a.m. to 6:00 a.m. the average reaction time is greater than three minutes. All other times during the day the averages are less than three minutes. Discussion It should be noted that in 1993, the Virginia Polytechnic Institute conducted a study of the Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Department and recommended that the "department collect data that can be used as a monitoring and evaluation tool". They stated that the data should be organized to reflect the actions of a particular station. The following data should be collected and reported in a supplemental section to the current Response Overview: • The number of calls and associated reaction response times for calls within a station's primary service area that the primary station handled. • The number of times a particular station responded to calls outside of its primary service area and the associated reaction response times. • • The number of times a particular station fails to respond to a call within six minutes, including those within the primary service area and those within secondary service areas. According to national statistics, most life-threatening EMS calls come between the hours of 4:00 a.m. and 7:00 a.m. and 80% of fire fatalities occur between 1:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. These hours are typically difficult to cover in our system. The accumulation of this data is designed to compile a working document that can be utilized in the future to make recommendations regarding the delivery of services from the fire and rescue department. Recommendations In order to better utilize these findings, I would recommend that we create a Quality Assurance Team to analyze responses, no responses, and reaction times on a quarterly basis. This will insure that we take a more focused look at the details of each response. Only then can we determine the cause of a no response or slow response/reaction time. Once the cause of such occurrences is revealed, then a solution can be formulated. At the end of each year, the team should make a recommendation to the Chief that will be carried forward to the Board of • Supervisors. Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Year Organized: 1986 (Officially combined Fire and Rescue Departments) Number of Volunteer Members: 546 Career Staff: 67 Busiest Day: Friday Busiest Hour: Slowest Day: Sunday Slowest Hour: Total Calls: 13,763 No Responses: Average Reaction Time: 2 minutes 6 seconds 17:00 to 18:00 3:00 to 4:00 2290 • Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview Station ' (All) A11= All Stations. Response (All) All = Total Dispatches,'0 =Number of No Responses ranw • Hour 1 2 3 4 _, 5 6 7 Grand'. Total 0 52 42 52 25 46 40 43 300 1 47 29 49 42 35 38 41 281 2 54 19 38 42 40 33 49 275 3 45 22 34 36 31 35 35 238 4 34 47 23 38 47 46 28 263 5 46 39 41 34 45 26 39 270 6 32 53 52 45 38 47 36 303 7 42 72 87 69 85 78 53 486 8 76 139 104 98 97 95 76 685 9 57 112 89 122 119 120 89 708 10 89 122 103 113 140 138 98 803 11 90 123 105 114 106 122 94 754 12 99 144 99 146 109 132 91 820 13 92 131 95 92 114 126 74 724 14 75 111 136 117 98 177 102 816 15 90 112 127 186 131 116 99 861 16 98 131 126 112 158 149 79 853 17 106 149 125 135 160 112 113 900 18 98 86 107 116 126 89 115 737 19 96 86 83 140 77 123 67 672 20 111 72 116 102 89 89 84 663 21 71 69 60 66 89 96 87 538 22 50 60 47 66 63 44 68 398 23 55 56 65 51 65 52 71 415 Grand Total 1705 '.2026 ...1963 2107 2108 2123 ' 1731 = 13763 Total # of Calls (By Station) DOW =Day of Week (1 =Sunday) Hour (0 = Midnight) • Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview • Station (All) A11= All Stations Response 0 All = Total'Dispatches, 0 =Number of No Responses DOW • Hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Grand' Total 0 7 3 8 6 13 6 5 48 1 5 1 11 8 9 9 8 51 2 13 6 8 11 10 7 11 66 3 9 5 12 6 12 8 7 59 4 11 17 7 12 19 19 6 91 5 21 15 16 11 16 9 13 101 6 10 14 6 8 17 13 15 83 7 15 10 17 17 18 7 14 98 8 17 23 13 18 15 18 21 125 9 11 26 10 19 26 13 15 120 10 23 17 17 13 28 30 24 152 11 13 20 16 19 14 18 14 114 12 20 27 15 34 15 18 15 144 13 9 15 18 10 12 18 10 92 14 11 16 25 23 10 33 18 136 15 6 12 11 36 24 12 8 109 16 14 20 23 17 32 25 5 136 17 14 17 17 25 31 14 17 135 18 9 15 15 24 20 15 14 112 19 7 12 11 24 10 19 6 89 20 9 7 14 8 8 10 5 61 21 4 5 8 7 6 14 11 55 22 3 10 4 8 3 6 9 43 23 10 10 8 4 14 10 14 70 Grand Total 271 323. 310 368 382 351 285'' 2290 Total # of Calls (By Station) DOW =Day of Week (1 =Sunday) Hour (0 = Midnight) • Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview • Station ,' (All) DOW Hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Average 0 152 220 192 178 220 165 133 180 1 206 249 239 184 160 195 194 204 2 206 152 215 209 200 221 186 201 3 234 267 198 256 192 196 235 224 4 236 200 252 210 241 211 245 225 5 198 208 193 295 269 265 238 235 6 202 136 113 112 72 126 195 133 7 173 81 78 80 73 92 223 104 8 225 107 75 64 108 69 167 111 9 167 68 85 81 70 97 167 98 10 140 99 75 101 75 69 207 105 11 178 95 77 64 169 74 126 109 12 98 83 67 63 71 83 137 84 13 147 86 61 70 96 75 110 91 14 115 109 99 73 110 77 136 99 15 253 116 78 86 99 93 151 116 16 138 103 73 112 118 114 132 111 17 131 114 120 122 137 146 149 131 18 124 122 122 138 110 122 113 121 19 133 88 134 113 116 141 124 122 20 133 122 131 119 137 115 156 130 21 134 199 116 139 170 119 116 141 22 179 107 143 155 144 104 133 138 23 135 156 198 167 147 141 202 166 Average:. 160 117 `112 111 124 110 156 126 All values indicate the average number of seconds between Dispatched and EnRoute for the selected department. • I~ • Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview By Station Vinton Fire Department Company 2 Year Organized: 1925 Number of Volunteer Members: 31 Career Staff: *4 (Town Employees) Monday -Friday 7:00 to 16:00 Busiest Day: Wednesday Busiest Hour: 17:00 to 18:00 Slowest Day: Monday Slowest Hour: 3:00 to 4:00 Total Calls: 496 No Responses: 82 Average Reaction Time: 3 minutes 1 second 'Note: Shaded areas represent career staff hours. I Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview Station ' C2 All = All Stations Response (All) All = Total Dispatches, 0 =Number of No Responses DOW • Hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Grand Total.. 0 2 2 1 1 6 1 1 1 1 1 2 6 2 4 1 1 2 4 12 3 1 3 4 4 1 1 2 2 6 5 1 1 1 2 1 1 7 6 2 1 3 1 1 3 11 7 2 2'' 3 1 4 4 4 20 8 2 7 2 2 3 3 5 24 9 3 2 4 6 5 5 25 10 4 °4 4 6 6 7 31 11 4 2 4 1 3 5 3 22 12 5 5' 2 10 4 4 2 32 13 3 5 3 1 4 3 2 21 14 3 5 5 4 2 7 7 33 15 2 4 5 7 4 4 2 28 16 6 3 6 4 5 8 32 17 8 8 2 7 10 2 2 39 18 6 1 5 7 6 4 5 34 19 3 4 6 12 1 5 2 33 20 8 9 7 3 3 4 34 21 3 1 2 6 12 22 1 1 1 2 1 3 9 23 3 3 3 2 1 2 1 15 Grand Total 69 64 66 83 69 74 ' 71 496 Total # of Calls (By Station) DOW =Day of Week (1 =Sunday) Hour (0 =Midnight) Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview ., Station C2 All =All Stations Response 0 All =Total Dispatches, 0 =Number of No Responses DOW • Hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Grand Total p 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 1 1 4 1 1 5 1 1 1 3 6 2 1 2 5 7 1 1 1 3 8 '' 1 1 1 3 9 3 1 4 10 2 2 11 1 1 1 3 12 2 2 1 1 6 13 1 1 2 14 1 1 2 15 2 1 1 1 5 16 1 1 2 3 1 3 11 17 1 2 1 1 1 6 18 1 2 1 2 6 19 1 4 5 20 1 1 1 3 21 1 1 2 23 1 1 1 1 4 Grand Totat- 11 10 7 17 13' 10 14 82 '' Total # of Calls (By Station) DOW =Day of Week (1 =Sunday) Hour (0 =Midnight) Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview • Station C2 DOW • Hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Average. 0 297 360 312 325 1 364 486 444 304 400 2 348 314 0 245 339 286 3 525 470 488 4 322 364 428 312 371 5 575 419 627 452 518 6 0 446 129 279 269 261 7 580 20 96 130 79 78 219 140 8 111 82 98 98 116 119 238 133 9 136 104 98 90 66 250 124 10 172 120 117 129 101 232 144 11 293 130 184 0 91 136 518 204 12 180 141 101 76' 129 71 161 114 13 365 97 84 72 98 135 116 128 14 156 104 L8 173' 0 118 451 198 15 194 54 71 82 102 81 295 109 16 83 199 149 0 310 241 184 17 212 116 108 241 267 92 263 203 18 136 212 260 319 160 291 266 229 19 85 115 168 162 0 208 239 158 20 119 163 244 178 109 230 173 21 129 339 220 115 152 22 240 132 319 264 39 91 170 23 254 168 223 260 65 214 210 Average 186 136 169 190 165 .:162 »260 181 All values indicate the average number of seconds between Dispatched and EnRoute for the selected department. Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview i• • By Station Vinton Rescue Squad Rescue 2 Year Organized: 1939 Number of Volunteer Members: 50 Career Staff: *3 (Town Employees) Monday - Friday. 2 from 6:00 to 14:00 and 1 from 9:00 to 17:00 Busiest Day: Friday Busiest Hour: 17:00 to 18:00 Slowest Day: Monday Slowest Hour: 2:00 to 3:00 Total Calls: 1448 No Responses: 215 Average Reaction Time: 3 minutes 15 seconds *Note: Shaded areas represent career staff hours. • Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview ., Sfation R2 All =All Stations Response (All) All =Total Dispatches, 0 =Number of No Responses DOW • Hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Grand Total 0 7 4 10 3 4 7 3 38 1 10 3 3 4 5 6 10~ 41 2 6 4 6 2 3 4 7 32 3 7 3 4 5 6 8 5 38 4 3 6 5 6 9 5 4 38 5 8 9 4 4 6 6 8 45 6 5 2 3 9 3 7 7 36 7 6 8 8 8 6 7 5 48 8 4 11 11 9 7 13 10 65 9 7 13 11 11 16 11 14 83 10 9 11 8 21 19 10 14 92 11 7 6 9 7 5 7 20 61 12 13 13 8 18 8 11 10 81 13 8 9 9 6 12 15 2 61 14 7 9 11 12 6 16 13 74 15 13 5 7 14 12 H 5 62 16 9 13 8 13 11 8 5 67 17 11 11 14 16 17 14 12 95 18 10 8 15 9 13 14 15 84 19 6 8 9 10 10 11 6 60 20 13 12 13 10 12 10 11 81 21 9 11 6 3 10 12 6 57 22 11 6 3 7 11 12 7 57 23 10 4 7 6 8 3 14 52 Grand Total 199 189 1'92 213.' 219 223 213 1448 Total # of Calls (By Station) DOW =Day of Week (1 =Sunday) Hour (0 =Midnight) • Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview • Station ' R2 A11=All Stations Response 0 All =Total Dispatches, 0 =Number of No Responses DOW • .Hour. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Grand Total 0 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 3 2 2 3 2 2 1 1 1 12 3 2 2 1 4 9 4 2 4 2 4 6 3 1 22 5 3 4 1 1 3 2 2 16 6 2 2 1 2 4 11 7 3 2 2 2 1 10 8 2 2 2 6 9 1 2 2 1 6 10 2 4 2 8 11 2 1 1 4 12 3 1 1 3 2 1 2 13 13 1 1 2 14 1 1 2 2 1 2 4 13 15 1 1 1 4 4 1 12 16 2 1 2 2 7 17 1 2 2 6 5 1 17 18 1 1 4 2 2 2 2 14 19 2 1 2 1 2 8 20 1 1 2 21 1 1 2 1 5 22 1 2 1 4 23 2 4 1 7 Grand Total 29 31 26 33 ~ 27 25_ 215 Total # of Calls (By Station) DOW =Day of Week (1 =Sunday) Hour (0 =Midnight) • Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview • Station R2 DOW • Hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Average 0 121 353 294 411 475 198 220 273 1 300 294 462 312 446 295 328 330 2 312 95 95 62 412 247 228 3 271 597 504 617 327 340 341 397 4 743 534 772 584 720 821 512 665 5 834 569 811 542 765 504 378 609 6 568 0 136 132 8 117 732 234 7 160 108 122 71 103 53 369 126 8 472 L5 78 100 141 149 157 149 9 187 87 92 121 132 111 186 130 10 65 184 82 141 103 112 219 138 11 189 168 78 79 124 119 103 119 12 151 ' 113 87 88 147 70 64 101 13 263 ' 85 120 71 157 103 47 128 14 66 213 238 138 474 137 78 174 15 58 514 104 187 187 106 237 169 16 246 . 103. 172 .189 170 395' 185 197 17 176 214 242 329 204 295 180 236 18 157 279 227 211 231 137 139 190 19 160 89 187 177 183 185 222 174 20 142 128 169 172 117 127 195 150 21 127 117 151 105 85 110 182 120 22 260 76 251 290 90 76 92 157 23 152 198 324 143 163 152 626 319 Average 211 177 201'. 183 ..187 17(' 231 . 195- All values indicate the average number of seconds between Dispatched and EriRoute for the selected department. • • Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview By Station Cave Spring Fire Department Company 3 Year Organized: 1942 Number of Volunteer Members: 32 Career Staff: *13 Total. 8 per day Monday -Friday 6:00 to 18:00 for Fire and Rescue Busiest.Day: Wednesday Busiest Hour: 15:00 to 16:00 Slowest Day: Saturday Slowest Hour: 3:00 to 4:00 Total Calls: 953 No Responses: 100 Average Reaction Time: 1 minute 48 seconds 'Note: Shaded areas represent career staff hours. • Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview Station' C3 All =All Stations Response (All) All =Total Dispatches, 0 =Number of No Responses DOW • • Hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Grand Total 0 3 1 2 4 2 4 16 1 4 1 2 2 3 2 14 2 4 1 1 4 2 2 1 15 3 1 1 1 3 4 1 2 1 2 2 8 5 2 1 2 1 3 1 1 11 6 1 5 2 3 3 2 16 7 2 8 10 _5 6 6 2 39 8 5 13 -11 8 8 8 2 55 9 1 3 7 12 5; 11 5 44 10 4 12'_ 14 8 9 15 3 65 11 4 12`' 8' 9 14 10 4 61 12 7 8' 9 12' 15 14 4 69 13 5 15 11 11 18 13 3 76 14 5 7 13 14 8 18 6 71 15 5 9 16 19 14 13 6 82 16 5 11 9 8 13 9 4 59 17 7 13 10 5 8 9 7 59 18 8 3 7 8 10 4 4 44 19 5 2 5 11 5 6 4 38 20 6 4 6 10 4 3 6 39 21 2 1 4 4 8 3 5 27 22 2 2 7 3 3 17 23 1 2 4 5 4 6 3 25 Grand Total 87 136 ' 156 167 167 '' '160 80 953 Total # of Calls (By Station) DOW =Day of Week (1 =Sunday) Hour (0 =Midnight) Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview • Station C3 All =All Stations Response ' 0 All =Total Disp,atches,-0 =Numlaer of No Responses DOW r~ • Hour 1 2 3 4 5 0 7 Grand Total 0 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 4 1 1 1 1 4 5 1 1 1 3 6 1 2 3 2 8 7 1 1 2' 1 1 6 8 1 2 1 1 1 6 9 1 1 10 4 1 2 1 8 11 1 1 1 2 5 12 1 3 - 2 6 13 2 1 1 4 1 9 14 2 1 1 2 2 8 15 1 2 3 16 2 2 4 17 1 2 1 2 1 7 18 2 1 3 19 1 1 1 3 20 1 1 21 1 1 2 22 1 1 23 1 1 1 2 5 Grand Total 15 13 15 13 21 13 10 100 Total # of Calls (By Station) DOW =Day of Week (1 =Sunday) Hour (0 =Midnight) Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview • Station C3 DOW • .Hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Average 0 200 132 292 367 179 12 193 1 95 113 379 334 205 207 210 2 391 327 50 264 150 111 262 3 343 343 4 426 325 3011 780 1136 5 430 544 455 371 495 0 380 6 354 331 0 178' 232 7 532 59 45 34' 72 6T 335 86 8 228 130 57 91' 75 °9.9' 74 102 9 429 57 72 76' 31 ' 45 96 71 10 84 66 84' 50 61 36 67 11 72 76' S8 ' 58' 63 91' 173 76 12 77 76 46 56 71 '60 95 66 13 131 ' 76 35 34' 31 45' 203 54 14 105 ' 68 80 64' 80 63' 188 80 15 86 60 67 62 95 79 122 77 16 121 39 65 ; 61! 39 73 103 64 17 92 1$4 109 123' 134 173 251 154 18 103 150 73 87 103 152 107 104 19 233 33 114 80 72 53 157 103 20 201 114 139 96 185 42 153 134 21 161 1277 114 109 157 306 166 209 22 59 227 84 176 214 140 23 151 0 271 123 251 204 97 186 Average 162 1.12 86 85 120 94 145 108 All values indicate the average number of seconds between Dispatched and EnRoute for the selected department. • i• i• Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview By Station Cave Spring Rescue Squad Rescue 3 Year Organized: 1958 Number of Volunteer Members: 51 Career Staff Busiest Day: Slowest Day: *Staffing shared with Cave Spring Fire Department Friday Busiest Hour: 11:00 to 12:00 Sunday Slowest Hour: 4:00 to 5:00 Total Calls: 1410 No Responses: 136 Average Reaction Time: 1 minute 46 seconds 'Note: Shaded areas represent career staff hours. i• Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview • Station R3 All =All Stations Response (All) All =Total Dispatches, 0 =Number of No Responses DOW • Hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Grand Total 0 5 7 4 3 5 6 7 37 1 8 4 4 6 3 7 3 35 2 6 2 3 7 7 3 5 33 3 2 3 4 5 2 4 4 24 4 3 2 1 3 3 4 1 17 5 1 4 6 2 6 3 1 23 6 2 7 6 3 4 5 4 31 7 7 8 10 6 10 7 3 51 8 3 13 12 12 9 12 6 67 9 5 10 8 9 8 11 10 61 10 6 13 14 10 6 16 8 73 11 11 21 13 15 13 17 14 104 12 14 15 10 12 17 19 7 94 13 12 15 17 6 13 14 11 88 14 9 11 17 12 10 19 8 86 15 9 11 7 22 11 12 13 85 16 7 11 14 11 17 18 12 90 17 5 21 11 5 10 9 9 70 18 8 11 11 12 19 6 13 80 19 13 3 7 13 10 11 6 63 20 10 6 10 12 9 8 7 62 21 6 2 9 7 11 10 8 53 22 5 6 2 8 10 5 2 38 23 5 4 6 7 7 7 9 45 Grand-Total 162 210' 206 208 220 .233 171 _ 1410 Total # of Calls (By Station) DOW =Day of Week (1 =Sunday) Hour (0 =Midnight) Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview Station ' R3 All = All Stations Response 0 All =Total Dispatches, 0 =Number of No Responses Hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 .7 Grand Total 0 1 1 1 2 5 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 4 3 1 1 4 2 1 1 4 5 1 1 2 6 1 1 7 2 1 1 4 8 1 3 2 1 2 1 10 9 1 2 1 4 8 10 3 2 1 1 6 13 11 1 5 1 2 2 2 2 15 12 1 3 2 3 9 13 1 5 1 7 14 1 2 2 1 3 9 15 1 1 2 3 2 9 16 1 2 1 3 1 8 17 3 1 ~ 2 1 1 8 18 1 3 1 1 6 19 1 1 1 1 4 20 1 1 2 21 1 2 1 1 5 22 1 1 Grand Total '' 10 27 ' 24 14 25 27 9 136 Total # of Calls (By Station) DOW =Day of Week (1 =Sunday) Hour (0 =Midnight) Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview Station R3 DOW • Hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 .Average. 0 96 97 123 133 347 145 101 143 1 110 157 147 170 124 149 140 141 2 171 177 138 204 206 125 175 179 3 219 164 188 149 117 141 214 171 4 96 154 189 91 176 175 194 151 5 198 165 165 190 194 216 283 189 6 223 202 169 185 138 151 168 176 7 168 97 83 53 110 78 190 106 8 165 82 86 78 116 94 150 98 9 124 91 76 85 73 167 222 124 10 160 81 99 80 56 117 216 114 11 111 106 57 75 92 77 164 97 12 51 144 69 71 77 77 68 80 13 122 97 97 73 66 73 65 85 14 81 72 83 80 128 67 91 84 15 82 140 93 86 113 99 96 100 16 82 69 98 122 . 104 91 67 91 17 97 117 143 167 187 150 170 144 18 75 89 46 114 100 75 90 87 19 83 103 86 79 104 84 76 86 20 88 126 77 91 96 86 80 91 21 118 104 90 112 69 81 95 91 22 66 89 41 59 89 76 65 75 23 118 110 88 92 131 106 69 99 Average 106 110 95 99 112 100 122 106 All values indicate the average number of seconds between Dispatched and EnRoute for the selected department. • Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview • By Station Catawba Fire Department Company 4 Year Organized: 1950 Number of Volunteer Members: 15 Career Staff: *0 -Rely on Volunteer Members Busiest Day: Friday Busiest Hour: Multiple • Slowest Day: Tuesday Slowest Hour: Multiple Total Calls: 55 No Responses: 31 Average Reaction Time: 5 minutes 3 seconds 'Note: Shaded areas represent career staff hours. Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview • Station C4 A11=All Stations Response (All) All =Total Dispatches, 0 = NuinUer of No Responses DOW • • Hour -1 2 ~ 4 5 6 7 Grand Total 2 1 1 3 1 1 4 1 1 2 5 2 1 3 6 1 1 7 2 1 1 4 8 1 1 9 1 1 10 1 1 1 1 4 11 1 1 12 1 1 13 2 1 3 14 1 1 1 1 2 6 15 1 1 16 1 1 1 1 1 5 17 1 2 1 1 5 19 3 3 6 20 1 1 2 21 1 2 3 23 2 1 1 4 Grand'Total ' 9 6 '' 4 10 6 11 9 ' S5 Total # of Calls (By Station) DOW =Day of Week (1 =Sunday) Hour (0 =Midnight) Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview Station ` C4 All _ All Stations Response 0 All =Total Dispatches,'0 =Number of No Responses DOW Hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Grand Total 5 2 1 3 6 1 1 7 2 1 1 4 8 1 1 10 1 1 1 1 4 11 1 1 13 1 1 2 14 1 1 1 3 15 1 1 16 1 1 2 17 2 1 3 19 3 3 20 1 1 23 1 1 2 Grand Total '5 3 2 9 4 7 1 31 Total # of Calls (By Station) DOW =Day of Week (1 =Sunday) Hour (0 =Midnight) • Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview Station C4 DOW • Haur 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Average 2 278 278 3 325 325 4 342 389 366 9 296 296 12 189 189 13 195 195 14 226 704 544 16 415 318 238 324 17 513 673 593 19 199 199 20 301 301 21 294 134 187 23 0 0 Average 344 65 234 415 496 224 366 303 All values indicate the average number of seconds between Dispatched and EnRoute for the selected department. • • U Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview By Station Hollins Fire Department Company 5 Year Organized: 1950 Number of Volunteer Members: 40 Career Staff: *13 Total. 8 per day Monday -Friday 6:00 to 18:00 for .Fire and Rescue Busiest Day: Monday Busiest Hour: 17:00 to 18:00 Slowest Day: Sunday Slowest Hour: Multiple Total Calls: 1059 No Responses: 128 Average Reaction Time: 1 minute 45 seconds 'Note: Shaded areas represent career staff hours. • Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview Station C5 All =All Stations Response (All) All =Total Dispatches, 0 =Number of No Responses DOW • Hour 1 2 3 4 - 5 6 7 Grand Total 0 5 2 1 2 10 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 8 2 1 2 1 3 2 9 3 4 1 3 1 2 1 12 4 1 2 1 1 2 1 8 5 2 3 2 1 1 1 2 12 6 1 4 8 6 3 5 1 28 7 3 11 7 8 8 9 2 48 8 6 17 7 15 11 8 5 69 9 2 10 7 17 15 10 6 67 10 4 14 7 6 19 16 7 73 11 7 13 1 0 15 11 11 67 12 4 15 11 11 15 11 4 71 13 6 10 8 3 9 18 4 58 14 1 15 14 11 14 20 8 83 15 15 13 17 14 8 7 74 16 5 12 12 9 14 17 1 70 17 6 '' 16 17 16 19 9 5 88 18 7 6 9 11 8 2 7 50 19 3 11 3 5 1 8 6 37 20 11 3 6 2 6 7 4 39 21 4 9 3 1 5 9 7 38 22 1 3 3 4 2 3 4 20 23 2 3 2 1 4 4 4 20 Grand'Total ' 86 198' 156 164'' 1'81 184 90 1059 Total # of Calls (By Station) DOW =Day of Week (1 =Sunday) Hour (0 =Midnight) • Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview • Station C5 All =All Stations Response 0 ..All =Total Dispatches, 0 =Number of No Responses DOW • Hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Grand Total. 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 2 1 1 2 3 1 1 1 3 4 1 1 5 1 1 1 3 7 1 1 2 8 2 2 1 1 2 8 9 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 10 10 1 3 3 3 10 11 1 1 1 3 1 2 9 12 1 2 2 1 1 1 8 13 2 2 2 1 7 14 2 2 4 3 1 12 15 1 1 3 1 6 16 3 2 2 2 2 11 17 2 1 2 5 18 1 2 2 5 19 1 1 1 1 2 6 20 1 1 2 1 2 7 21 1 1 2 22 1 1 1 3 23 1 1 1 3 Grand Total 16 16 '' ' 20 21 19 _ 26 10 128 Total # of Calls (By Station) DOW =Day of Week (1 =Sunday) Hour (0 =Midnight) • Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview • Station C5 DOW Hour 1 2 3 4 5 b 7 Average 0 129 253 204 173 1 348 250 340 322 2 535 175 227 211 303 3 238 157 164 149 175 223 194 4 391 445 347 575 333 234 396 5 82 273 0 362 451 556 260 260 6 241 118 16 52 53 39 123 58 7 155 102 82 71 31 67 317 86 8 242 62 81 37 124 40 102 86 9 63 72 ' ' ' 61 64 51 233 77 10 165 93 25 55 3b 53 333 79 11 242 48 86 ''72 81 41 84 12 64 71 44 ' 92 97 43 150 74 13 370 65 26 66 h6 46 121 82 14 187 62 85 78 64 87 107 80 15 266 77 79 80 42 245 130 16 349 89 53 293 57 92 0 116 17 31 34 11b 75 72 53 83 70 18 66 99 192 190 141 124 79 132 19 64 65 76 197 96 88 93 20 159 97 248 145 245 136 112 169 21 133 261 39 154 39 34 86 110 22 164 171 179 186 292 174 132 179 23 517 268 312 165 150 229 62 201 Average 174 110 95 107 83 ''76 146 '' 105 All values indicate the average number of seconds between Dispatched and EnRoute for the selected department. • i• Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview By Station Hollins Rescue Squad Rescue 5 Year Organized: 1950 Number of Volunteer Members: 25 Career Staff: *Staffing shared with Hollins Fire Department Busiest Day: Monday Busiest Hour: 15:00 to 16:00 Slowest Day: Sunday Slowest Hour: 2:00 to 3:00 Total Calls: 1954 No Responses: Average Reaction Time: 2 minutes 36 seconds 'Note: Shaded areas represent career staff hours. 271 U Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview Station R5 A11=All Stations Response (All) All =Total Dispatches, 0 -= Number of No Responses DOW • Hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Grande Total 0 8 9 10 6 5 6 6 50 1 7 6 5 8 6 5 5 42 2 7 1 5 6 5 6 6 36 3 11 5 5 5 4 6 7 43 4 6 6 7 8 8 5 40 5 5 11 4 10 6 3 3 42 6 4 8 11 7 4 11 6 51 7 8 14 8 10 8 14 5 67 8 10 22 11 17 15 11 19 105 9 12 14 13 20 22 18 8 107 10 11 24 7 12 22 14 22 112 11 14 15 15 20 14 20 17 115 12 11 21 13 14 18 18 16 111 13 14 10 13 6 10 15 12 80 14 13 19 15 14 17 24 12 114 15 12 18 20 28 16 8 15 117 16 9 17 15 12 19 19 12 103 17 13 23 18 21 19 9 9 112 18 14 13 17 18 12 14 18 106 19 18 13 11 20 11 14 12 99 20 13 12 11 13 18 17 14 98 21 11 10 7 11 14 18 11 82 22 6 10 7 7 11 8 13 62 23 12 11 9 3 9 6 10 60 Grand'Total ' 249 312: 250 295 293. 292 263 1954 Total # of Calls (Sy Station) DOW =Day of Week (1 =Sunday) Hour (0 =Midnight) • Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview ,. Station R5 All =All Stations Response 0 All '= Total Dispatches, 0 =Number of No Responses DOW • Hour 1 2- 3 4 5 6 7 Grand Total 0 1 2 1 1 2 1 8 1 2 1 3 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 9 3 2 2 1 2 2 9 4 2 2 3 5 1 1 14 5 3 4 2 3 2 2 16 6 1 1 1 1 3 3 10 7 3 1 2 2 8 8 5 4 3 1 1 10 24 9 4 4 5 1 5 19 10 5 4 2 6 2 8 27 11 3 1 3 3 1 1 3 15 12 1 4 2 1 3 2 3 16 13 1 2 3 2 8 14 2 3 ~ 1 3 3 15 15 1 1 2 4 4 12 16 2 2 3 3 1 11 17 1 1 3' 3 8 18 1 1 3 1 2 1 9 19 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 9 20 1 2 3 21 1 1 3 5 22 1 1 1 1 1 5 23 3 1 1 2 1 8 Grand Total ' 38 34 25 43 48 35 48 271 Total # of Calls (By Station) DOW =Day of Week (1 =Sunday) Hour (0 =Midnight) • Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview • Station R5 DOW • Hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Average 0 90 207 253 138 315 177 142 188 1 166 256 176 193 327 236 155 215 2 263 309 388 543 582 261 174 355 3 350 419 226 235 272 226 293 305 4 406 209 332 235 380 266 316 5 262 285 303 526 381 582 574 410 6 301 112 102 112 88 123 293 137 7 254 70 90 113 72 104 208 111 8 228 - 203 87 79 89 87 363 151 9 199 91 99 81 68 80 112 99 10 266 112 90 124 114 83 480 179 11 225 87 81 98 903 78 145 216 12 163 . 106 103 80 82 110 139 110 13 180 78 90 72 161 94 200 129 14 145 98 116 79 86 74 141 101 15 1203 88 87 139 109 107 127 226 16 93 105 54 105 121 103 193 111 17 125 87 116 '' 116 T50 122 147 120 18 179 113 158 189 119 205 111 153 19 65 103 88 208 123 103 149 124 20 148 115 143 123 156 135 93 131 21 105 93 53 119 269 124 75 128 22 101 82 128 128 115 117 89 105 23 163 119 157 108 156 135 102 137 Average 227 124 119 146 186 '127 ! 178 156 All values indicate the average number of seconds between Dispatched and EnRoute for the selected department. • Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview i• • By Station Mount Pleasant Fire Department Company 6 Year Organized: 1955 Number of Volunteer Members: 22 Career Staff: *1 Monday -Friday 8:00 to 16:00 for Fire and Rescue Busiest Day: Saturday Busiest Hour: 19:00 to 20:00 Slowest Day: Thursday Slowest Hour: 2:00 to 3:00 Total Calls: 213 No Responses: 74 Average Reaction Time: 3 minutes 47 seconds 'Note: Shaded areas represent career staff hours. Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview Station C6 A11=All Stations Response (All) A11=Total Dispatches, 0 =Number of No Responses DOW • Hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Grand` Total 0 1 1 2 1 1 6 1 2 1 3 2 1 1 3 1 1 2 4 1 1 2 5 1 1 1 3 6 1 1 1 1 2 1 7 7 1 1 1 3 8 1 2 1 1 1 6 9 1 2 2 1 1 3 10 10 2 1 2 1 2 3 11 11 3 1 1 1 6 12 3 3 3 5 1 1 2 18 13 2 3 1 2 2 1 11 14 3 2 2 7 15 2 4 1 2 9 16 3 2 2 3 2 2 14 17 5 1 1 6 2 1 1 17 18 2 2 1 3 3 1 2 14 19 1 2 4 3 2 5 2 19 20 2 2 4 2 4 14 21 2 2 1 2 3 3 5 18 22 1 2 1 3 7 23 1 2 1 1 5 Grand Total 32 28 31 33 ' `25' 26 3$ 213 Total # of Calls (By Station) DOW =Day of Week (1 =Sunday) Hour (0 =Midnight) • Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview Station C6 All =All Stations Response 0 All =Total Dispatches, 0 =Number of No Responses DOW • Hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Grand Total 0 1 2 3 1 1 1 2 1 1 3 1 1 2 4 1 1 5 1 1 2 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 7 1 1 2 8 1 1 2 9 2 1 1 2 6 10 1 1 1 2 5 11 1 1 2 12 2 4 1 7 13 1 1 2 14 1 1 2 15 1 1 16 1 1 2 17 1 2 1 4 18 1 1 1 1 1 5 19 2 1 2 1 1 7 20 1 1 1 3 21 1 1 1 3 22 1 2 3 23 1 1 2 Grande Total 4 9 14 13 ' 10 10 14 74 Total # of Calls (By Station) DOW =Day of Week (1 =Sunday) Hour (0 =Midnight) Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview Station C6 DOW Hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Average 0 288 372 266 309 1 363 239 301 4 445 445 5 316 316 6 483 483 7 602 602 8 161 295 408 256 9 280 370 96 277 256 10 269 300 454 289 195 301 11 301 173 269 12 103 171 271 0 133 230 153 13 80 84 275 152 148 148 14 478 234 275 348 15 54 114 191 637 240 16 108 278 274 259 126 275 217 17 146 289 120 243 207 190 164 18 183 157 277 135 215 381 206 19 232 166 354 174 294 226 252 20 308 0 271 206 244 234 21 177 139 422 247 255 244 121 202 22 227 24 377 163 23 281 199 297 259 Average 178 201' 240' 21'5 276 243 268 227 All values indicate the average number of seconds between Dispatched and EnRoute for the selected department. • • • Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview By Station Mount Pleasant Rescue Squad Rescue 6 Year Organized: 1954 Number of Volunteer Members: 10 Career Staff: *Staffing shared with Mount Pleasant Fire Department Busiest Day: Saturday Busiest Hour: 17:00 to 18:00 Slowest Day: Wednesday Slowest Hour: 2:00 to 3:00 Total Calls: 511 No Responses: 228 Average Reaction Time: 5 minutes 8 seconds 'Note: Shaded areas represent career staff hours. LJ Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview • Station R6 All =All Stations Response (All) All =Total Dispatches, 0 =Number of No Responses DOW • Hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Grande Total 0 2 2 3 2 3 12 1 2 1 4 3 2 1 4 17 2 2 2 1 2 1 2 10 3 3 3 1 2 3 2 1 15 4 4 5 3 2 3 3 1 21 5 5 3 3 3 2 4 20 6 2 2 1 2 1 3 5 16 7 2 2 6 2 1 7 20 8 5 4 4 2 3 4 3 25 9 4 3 1 1 6 1 5 21 10 5 2 3 4 5 2 3 24 11 5 1 1 3 1 5 16 12 5 5 5 2 3 1 4 25 13 3 3 3 1 2 5 1 18 14 2 6 2 4 3 17 15 3 3 2 2 3 3 3 19 16 3 9 3 2 4 5 4 30 17 3 4 4 8 5 7 7 38 18 2 4 5 4 3 1 5 24 19 6 7 1 3 4 9 3 33 20 2 1 7 4 3 4 -5 26 21 4 4 2 4 2 7 4 27 22 5 1 4 3 4 17 23 3 4 3 2 2 1 5 20 Grand Total 78 73 71 64 65 72 88 511 '' Total # of Calls (By Station) DOW =Day of Week (1 =Sunday) Hour (0 =Midnight) • Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview Station R6 All =All Stations Response 0 All =Total Dispatches, 0 = NumUer of No Responses DOW • Hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Grand Total 0 1 2 1 2 6 1 1 1 3 2 2 1 1 11 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 7 3 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 9 4 3 3 3 2 2 3 1 17 5 4 3 2 3 2 2 16 6 2 1 1 1 1 3 9 7 1 1 4 1 1 4 12 8 3 1 2 1 1 4 2 14 9 2 1 1 1 2 1 8 10 1 2 3 4 2 1 13 11 1 1 3 1 6 12 2 4 2 1 2 1 1 13 13 1 2 1 1 5 14 1 6 3 1 11 15 1 2 1 1 1 6 16 3 1 1 3 1 9 17 1 1 3 4 3 1 2 15 18 2 1 2 1 1 3 10 19 2 1 1 1 4 9 20 1 1 1 2 1 2 8 21 1 1 2 4 22 2 1 3 23 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 Gland Total 26 29 42 32 32 36 31 228 Total # of Calls (By Station) DOW =Day of Week (1 =Sunday) Hour (0 =Midnight) C~ Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview Station R6 -DOW • Hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Average 0 568 415 526 391 427 482 1 451 713 437 438 486 2 456 412 410 426 3 512 760 186 901 605 4 901 597 534 657 5 409 769 518 553 6 586 550 10 857 452 538 7 419 528 392 449 293 382 8 167 130 241 112 789 779 334 9 469 165 139 16 339 246 10 336 126 356 146 415 278 11 306 10 80 230 223 12 318 131 117 281 176 438 267 13 239 137 81 293 519 182 65 206 14 126 98 217 357 209 15 222 162 232 65 316 422 222 16 278 249 280 390 368 129 269 17 129 487 152 186 302 296 361 296 18 284 146 147 224 370 228 221 19 192 173 348 336 198 238 226 20 267 317 230 303 194 322 277 21 221 260 194 419 412 262 154 273 22 311 427 339 117 311 286 23 561 505 686 494 510 337 489 Average 310 311 275 304 '349 266 326 ..308 All values indicate the average number of seconds between Dispatched and EnRoute for the selected department. • • U Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview By Station Clearbrook Fire Department Company 7 Year Organized: 1955 Number of Volunteer Members: 22 Career Staff: Fire and Rescue Busiest Day: Slowest Day: *7 Total. 5 per day Monday -Friday 7:00 to 17:00 for Thursday Busiest Hour: 17:00 to 18:00 Saturday Slowest Hour: 6:00 to 7:00 Total Calls: 451 No Responses: Average Reaction Time:. 2 minutes 7 seconds 'Note: Shaded areas represent career staff hours. 61 • Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview • Station C7 All'= All Stations Response (All) Ali'=Total Dispatches,-0 = NumUer of No Responses DOW Hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Grand Total 0 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 9 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 9 2 2 1 1 2 4 1 11 3 1 2 3 4 1 3 2 1 2 1 10 5 1 2 3 1 7 6 2 1 1 4 7 3 1 1 1 1 1 S 8 1 6 7 4 h 7 1 32 9 1 4 4 5 2 4 3 23 10 3 2 8 3 2 4 2 24 11 3 2 4 1 7 6 3 26 12 3 6 2 10 5 6 3 35 13 6 6 4 4 8 4 1 33 14 3 1 6 5 3 2 20 15 3 3 3 7 8 4 3 31 16 5 2 8 6 6 5 2 34 17 6 8 5 4 5 6 4 38 18 5 1 3 2 5 4 3 23 19 5 1 3 7 1 4 5 26 20 5 2 1 4 2 1 15 21 1 3 1 4 9 22 1 1 1 2 2 1 8 23 1 1 1 3 4 2 12 Grand Total ; 60 57 69 76 ' 79 66 43 450 Total # of Calls (By Station) DOW =Day of Week (1 =Sunday) Hour (0 =Midnight) • Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview Station C7 All =All Stations Response 0 All =Total Dispatches, 0 =Number of No Responses DOW • Hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Grand Total. 0 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 4 1 1 2 5 2 2 6 1 1 7 1 1 2 8 1 1 2 9 1 1 2 10 1 1 1 3 11 1 1 12 1 2 1 4 13 1 1 1 1 4 14 2 2 1 1 6 15 1 1 16 1 1 1 3 17 3 2 1 1 2 4 1 14 18 1 1 2 4 19 1 1 2 20 1 1 2 21 1 1 23 1 1 2 Grand Total 9 12 8 8 9 11 4 61 Total # of Calls (By Station) DOW =Day of Week (1 =Sunday) Hour (0 =Midnight) • Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview • Station C7 DOW • Hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Average 0 304 306 328 169 591 0 132 270 1 188 375 232 124 176 127 205 2 185 164 429 234 270 155 239 3 410 255 306 4 358 293 198 378 250 134 263 5 211 691 175 492 6 450 125 384 320 7 46 130 - 122' 368 127 8 135 167 59 82 84 50 219 94 9 196 ' 56 165 149: 49 41 241 129 10 334 77 87 148 53 112 27 113 11 96 101 93 102 95 58 38 80 12 215 53 112 64' 62 88 46 76 13 90 83 53 -39 77 87 79 74 14 133 0 77 43 52 78 64 15 98 54 115 122 110 99 140 108 16 303 130 100 ' 96 117 144' 91 142 17 157 137 149 151 139 103 95 135 18 123 157 146 106 120 73 118 19 254 43 114 76 77 97 98 116 20 90 0 103 100 174 177 106 21 133 148 385 74 148 22 128 159 89 114 108 257 135 23 29 219 133 134 109 127 .Average 176 123 121. 110 149 '95 115 127 All values indicate the average number of seconds between Dispatched and EnRoute for the selected department. • Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview i• • By Station Clearbrook Rescue Squad Rescue 7 Year Organized: 1959 Number of Volunteer Members: 26 Career Staff: *Staffing shared with Clearbrook Fire Department Busiest Day: Friday Busiest Hour: 13:00 to 14:00 Slowest Day: Multiple Total Calls: 902 No Responses: Average Reaction Time: 1 minute 34 seconds Slowest Hour: 5:00 to 6:00 'Note: Shaded areas represent career staff hours. 82 I• Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview Station R7 All =All .Stations Response (All) All =Total Dispatches, 0 =Number of No Responses DOW • Hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Grand Total 0 3 4 3 2 3 5 3 23 1 1 1 3 3 3 2 3 16 2 1 2 2 1 5 3 2 16 3 3 3 1 3 2 1 1 14 4 3 4 5 3 2 1 3 21 5 3 1 1 2 2 9 6 2 2 3 2 3 2 1 15 7 3 4 1 3 4 3 18 8 3 10 9 5 11 4 2 44 9 1 5 7 9 5 12 7 46 10 5 10 11 10 8 11 3 58 11 6 12 4 5 12 4 6 49 12 6 12 10 12 5 10 5 60 13 10 11 7 15 12 12 5 72 14 8 8 11 6 4 8 6 51 15 6 8 7 8 9 12 9 59 16 5 9 12 11 8 3 8 56 17 7 13 9 8 11 14 6 68 18 9 9 5 4 11 9 7 54 19 8 2 8 7 5 10 8 48 20 6 3 5 4 5 6 2 31 21 4 1 3 4 7 8 3 30 22 4 5 3 6 1 3 22 23 4 3 4 4 4 1 2 22 Grand Total 108 141 137 133 141 142 100 902 Total # of Calls (By Station) DOW =Day of Week (1 =Sunday) Hour (0 =Midnight) Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview Station `' R7 All =:All Stations:' Response 0 All =Total Dispatches, 0 =Number of No Responses DOW • Hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Grande. Total '. 0 1 2 3 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 3 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 5 5 1 1 2 6 1 2 3 7 1 1 2 8 1 1 2 9 1 1 2 10 1 1 2 11 1 1 2 2 6 12 2 1 2 1 6 13 1 2 1 2 6 14 3 1 1 5 15 1 1 2 4 16 1 3 1 1 1 7 17 1 1 1 2 5 18 3 3 6 19 1 1 1 3 20 1 1 1 3 21 1 2 3 22 1 1 2 Grand Total " 12 ' 15 9 9' 16 12 9 ' 82 Total # of Calls (By Station) DOW =Day of Week (1 =Sunday) Hour (0 =Midnight) • Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview Station R7 DOW • Hour T 2 3 4 5 6 7 Average 0 113 80 102 112 109 137 125 112 1 232 92 230 71 147 191 .117 158 2 136 191 271 92 158 167 210 177 3 203 108 340 129 162 167 296 173 4 124 151 148 170 199 166 154 5 278 335 119 234 217 242 6 147 125 599 183 153 145 226 7 1Q6 97 70 119 103 191 119 8 105 116 62 78 96 69 113 91 9 132 77 58 131 34 61 115 82 10 99 70 26 : 69 49 75 40 61 11 130 75 68 77 58 68 89 79 12 74 73 76 62 72 97 50 74 13 96 84 56 59 67 97 86 77 14 34 102 53 86 112 96 69 77 15 62 87 105 68 66 77 79 78 16 127 73 77 92 86 98 96 89 17 81 127 78 117 116 83 177 109 18 112 74 94 80 89 97 68 89 19 93 53 72 75 46 77 107 80 20 114 145 85 87 88 73 31 89 21 115 111 27 110 90 92 102 91 22 75 116 85 90 75 171 100 23 127 138 115 87 60 143 67 102 Average 1'06 98 '91 $8 '89 '90 ' 106 '' 94 All values indicate the average number of seconds between Dispatched and EnRoute for the selected department. • '~ • Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview • By Station Bent Mountain Fire Department Company 8 Year Organized: 1958 Number of Volunteer Members: 18 Career Staff Busiest Day: *3 Monday -Friday 7:00 to 17:00 for Fire and Rescue Monday Slowest Day: Saturday Busiest Hour: 16:00 to 17:00 Slowest Hour: Multiple Total Calls: 81 No Responses: 29 Average Reaction Time: 5 minutes 46 seconds 'Note: Shaded areas represent career staff hours. • Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview Station- C8 All =All Stations Response (All) All =Total Dispatches, 0 =Number of No Responses DDW • Hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Grand Total 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 2 1 2 3 3 1 1 4 1 1 2 5 1 1 2 6 1 1 2 7 1 1 2 8 2 1 g 9 1 1 10 1 1 1 1 4 11 1 1 12 1 1 2 4 13 1 1 1 1 1 5 14 1 1 1 g 15 1 2 1 4 16 3 1 1 3 g 17 1 1 1 3 18 2 1 3 19 1 1 2 20 2 3 1 1 7 21 2 1 3 1 1 8 22 1 1 2 23 1 3 1 1 1 7 Grand Total 10 14 12 12 13 12 8 81 Total # of Calls (By Station) DOW =Day of Week (1 =Sunday) Hour (0 =Midnight) Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview ~J Station C8 A11=All Stations Response 0 All =Total Dispatches,"0 = Number of No Responses DOW • Hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Grand Total 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 3 3 1 1 5 1 1 6 1 1 2 7 1 1 2 10 1 1 1 3 12 1 2 3 13 1 1 15 2 2 16 1 1 18 1 1 20 1 2 1 4 21 1 1 23 2 2 GraiZd Total 4 4 5 6 3 2 5 29 Total # of Calls (By Station) DOW =Day of Week (1 =Sunday) Hour (0 =Midnight) • Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview • Station C8 DOW Hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Average 0 513 513 1 404 404 4 680 654 667 5 604 604 8 521 0' 347 9 370 370 10 129 129 11 948 948 12 28~ 282 13 0 204 153 0 89 14 150 116 109 125 15 245 179 212 16 250 178 315 268 17 0 656 330 329 18 558 386 472 19 355 288 322 20 364 290 385 346 21 270 209 502 320 368 22 485 571 528 23 394 368 603 396 312 415 Average 337 350 231 3T7 387 348 523 34'6 All values indicate the average number of seconds between Dispatched and EnRoute for the selected department. • i• • Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview By Station Bent Mountain Rescue Squad Rescue 8 Year Organized: 1963 Number of Volunteer Members: 17 Career Staff: *Staffing shared with Bent Mountain Fire Department Busiest Day: Monday Busiest Hour: 16:00 to 17:00 Slowest Day: Saturday Slowest Hour: 0:00 to 1:00 Total Calls: 218 No Responses: 44 Average Reaction Time: 5 minutes 5 seconds 'Note: Shaded areas represent career staff hours. • Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview • Station R8 'All =All Stations Response (All) All =Total Dispatches, 0 =.Number of No Responses DOW • .Hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 -Grand Total 0 1 1 2 1 2 2 4 2 1 1 1 3 3 1 2 1 4 4 2 1 3 5 1 1 2 4 6 1 2 3 7 1 1 1 1 4 8 4 3 2 2 11 9 4 1 1 2 2 10 10 1 4 1 2 2 3 2 15 11 1 4 2 2 1 4 1 15 12 3 1 1 4 3 2 14 13 2 1 1 1 2 7 14 2 2 1 2 7 15 2 2 1 3 1 2 1 12 16 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 16 17 3 1 5 2 1 12 18 2 2 2 3 1 1 11 19 3 1 2 2 1 9 20 1 3 6 2 2 14 21 3 2 1 5 3 1 15 22 1 3 4 2 1 2 13 23 2 3 2 2 1 10 Grand-Total 32 37 ~1 32 30 33 23 218 '. Total # of Calls (By Station) DOW =Day of Week (1 =Sunday) Hour (0 =Midnight) L Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview Station R8 A11=All Stations Response 0 All =Total Dispatches, 0 =Number of No Responses DOW C, Hour 1 2 3 4 5 6' 7 Grand Total 1 1 1 3 2 1 3 4 1 1 5 2 2 6 2 2 7 1 1 2 8 1 1 2 9 1 1 11 2 1 1 4 12 1 1 2 1 5 13 1 1 1 3 14 1 1 15 1 1 16 1 1 2 4 17 2 1 3 18 1 1 1 3 19 1 1 20 1 1 22 1 1 2 23 1 1 2 Grand Total 3 6 6 9 8 7 5 44 Total # of Calls (By Station) DOW =Day of Week (1 =Sunday) Hour (0 =Midnight) • Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview • Station R8 DOW • Hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 'Average 0 573 636 605 1 695 554 648 2 746 791 947 828 3 523 523 4 838 880 859 5 461 273 367 6 437 437 7 12~ 943 533 8 619 57 78 0 242 9 91 110 83 648 728 358 10 269 .227 LO 325 0 30 442 195 11 395 256 136 77 0 83 0 132 12 454 109 h2 450 495 337 13 31 342 186 14 0 1092 0 87 211 15 355 92 0 57 11 54 107 16 302 327 101 103 1271 529 339 17 593 300 699 1206 449 648 18 452 450 565 245 117 372 19 658 165 218 315 0 361 20 21 74 140 0 81 90 21 307 76 135 233 109 185 192 22 20 247 265 340 241 247 23 620 411 807 362 565 543 Average- 427 236' 197 ,` 216 291 350 447 X05 All values indicate the average number of seconds between Dispatched and EnRoute for the selected department. • I• i• Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview By Station Fort Lewis Fire Department Company 9 Year Organized: 1962 Number of Volunteer Members: 27 Career Staff: *8 Total. 5 per day Monday -Friday 6:00 to 18:00 for Fire and Rescue Busiest Day: Wednesday Busiest Hour: 15:00 to 16:00 Slowest Day: Sunday Slowest Hour: Multiple Total Calls: 572 No Responses: 113 Average Reaction Time: 2 minutes 17 seconds 'Note: Shaded areas represent career staff hours. i• Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview Station C9 All = All.Stations Response (All) All =Total Dispatches, 0 =Number o£No Responses DOW Hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Grand Total 0 4 1 1 6 1 2 2 4 2 1 4 2 3 2 12 3 1 1 1 3 4 3 3 5 1 2 2 1 1 1 8 6 1 4 2 2 1 2 1 13 7 2 2 5 5 7 6 2 29 8 6 4 9 5 4 5 2 35 9 2 8 5 3 8 7 1 34 10 2 4 7 7 5 9 1 35 11 3 5 7 9 3 `8 2 37 12 2 8 2 4 6 7 3 32 13 1 8 4 8 4 5 5 35 14 3 3 6 9 9 9 2 41 15 5 8 9 14 7 9 8 60 16 7 5 3 2 13 7 3 40 17 3 5 3 5 8 6 8 38 18 2 2 3 2 2 2 4 17 19 3 4 1 9 2 2 1 22 20 2 3 5 4 1 2 2 19 21 4 3 3 4 1 3 2 20 22 4 3 1 2 3 13 23 1 2 1 6 1 5 16 Grand' Total 56 83 87 100": 96 91 59 572 Total # of Calls (By Station) DOW =Day of Week (1 =Sunday) Hour (0 =Midnight) • Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview • Station C9 All =All Stations Response 0 All =Total Dispatches, 0 =.Number of No Responses DOW • Hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Grand Total 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 3 6 1 1 2 7 1 1 1 2 2 1 8 8 1 1 3 1 1 7 9 1 4 2 3 2 12 10 1 3 2 3 9 11 2 1 1 1 1 6 12 2 3 5 13 1 1 2 1 2 1 8 14 2 1 4 1 3 11 15 1 2 1 4 2 4 1 15 16 2 3 1 2 2 10 17 1 1 2 18 1 1 1 3 19 1 1 2 20 1 1 21 1 1 2 22 2 2 23 1 3 4 Grand Total 9 20 12 25 19 22 6 113 Total # of Calls (By Station) DOW =Day of Week (1 =Sunday) Hour (0 =Midnight) • Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview • Station C9 DOW • Hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Average 0 337 322 285 326 1 244 323 270 2 390 322 375 276 364 325 3 359 338 336 344 4 286 286 5 318 304 317 444 0 333 292 6 284 108 42 0 58 315 102 7 250 97 76 66 62 105 311 100 8 318 62 74 66 43 36 288 131 9 284 52 27 0 131 36 270 79 10 186 55 110 20 61 62 364 82 11 258 41 18 43 45 83 98 57 12 176 58 35 21 32 54 237 75 13 222 89 70 83 54 70 157 95 14 176 53 105 74 91 35 93 80 15 238 64 87 101 146 74 199 123 16 235 137 117 167 316 64 196 213 17 104 58 93 18 17 70 186 78 18 274 172 133 189 319 230 150 188 19 288 175 89 141 350 283 264 200 20 202 107 271 124 37 94 337 178 21 174 144 160 174 186 152 152 162 22 292 254 0 263 278 246 23 335 491 317 254 223 290 Average 247 97 125 101 147 80 218 137 All values indicate the average number of seconds between Dispatched and EnRoute for the selected department. • • • Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview By Station Fort Lewis Rescue Squad Rescue 9 Year Organized: 1960 Number of Volunteer Members: 23 Career Staff: *Staffing shared with Fort Lewis Fire Department Busiest Day: Saturday Busiest Hour: 15:00 to 16:00 Slowest Day: Monday Slowest Hour: 5:00 to 6:00 Total Calls: 1232 No Responses: 117 Average Reaction Time: 2 minutes 11 seconds *Note: Shaded areas represent career staff hours. U Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview Station R9 A11=All Stations Response (All) All =Total Dispatches, 0 =Number of No Responses DOW • Hour. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Grand Total 0 6 3 5 4 2 4 6 30 1 4 4 4 5 5 2 3 27 2 7 2 4 4 4 2 4 27 3 5 1 4 3 1 3 5 22 4 3 5 2 6 10 7 4 37 5 2 2 4 2 1 2 4 17 6 6 5 6 3 1 3 3 27 7 2 2 8 8 9 11 5 45 8 10 10 9" 6 4 6 6 51 9 7 10 10 8 11 9 7 62 10 14 5 7 9 8 9 10 62 11 9 10 12 12 8 11 8 70 12 8 14 6 7 8 12 16 71 13 10 13 5 13 5 9 11 66 14 5 7 6 10 11 13 11 63 15 12 10 10 18 9 10 9 78 16 11 9 10 4 13 11 10 68 17 8 10 7 11 11 11 19 77 18 7 5 8 5 13 13 15 66 19 6 12 7 6 14 9 3 57 20 8 8 15 13 7 7 10 68 21 13 8 8 10 6 7 5 57 22 8 6 8 4 6 5 11 48 23 6 2 5 5 4 4 10 36 Grand Total 177 163 170 176 171 180 195 1232 '' Total # of Calls (By Station) DOW =Day of Week (1 =Sunday) Hour (0 =Midnight) • Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview Station " R9 All =All Stations Response 0 All =Total Dispatches, 0 = NumUer of No'Responses DOW • Hour. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Grand Total 2 1 1 2 3 1 1 4 1 1 2 4 5 2 1 3 6 1 1 7 1 2 3 1 1 8 8 1 1 1 1 2 6 9 1 1 1 2 1 3 9 10 2 2 2 4 1 11 11 2 1 3 1 1 3 11 12 1 4 1 1 2 9 13 4 1 2 1 1 1 10 14 2 1 1 3 7 15 3 3 16 1 1 4 2 8 17 1 1 1 2 3 8 18 1 3 2 6 19 1 1 2 21 1 1 1 3 22 1 1 23 1 3 4 Grand Total 11 16 13 17 15 20 `?5 117 Total # of Calls (By Station) DOW =Day of Week (1 =Sunday) Hour (0 =Midnight) • Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview • Station R9 DOW • Hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Average 0 181 132 141 132 153 118 156 148 1 114 148 144 131 197 206 163 154 2 130 295 174 210 148 189 202 180 3 199 93 68 223 169 153 215 174 4 226 198 117 218 163 182 252 196 5 403 176 163 206 190 350 259 6 183 205 121 152 102 75 232 159 7 224 104 102 82 105 135 399 145 8 214 83 85 108 84 66' 265 127 9 198 154 79 84 88 202 154 132 10 170 89 75 103 96 66 315 147 11 279 103 122 53 91 77 246 132 12 84 122 113 105 73 122 135 112 13 143 90 109 93 191 129 94 115 14 117 86 113 92 172 135 102 122 15 80 71 92 100 104 122 97 95 16 85 140 74 1.13 131 144 91 110 17 98 147 129 1'17 123 120 126 124 18 107 59 93 177 91 105 107 104 19 94 105 171 111 135 295 104 148 20 98 96 89 99 86 170 67 98 21 134 105 233 157 145 138 166 151 22 251 97 123 123 158 116 133 148 23 89 55 132 97 106 210 109 113 Average 147 119 115' 117 123 139 156 131 All values indicate the average number of seconds between Dispatched and EnRoute for the selected department. • I• • Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview By Station Masons Cove Fire Department Company 10 Year Organized: 1968 Number of Volunteer Members: 23 Career Staff: *5 Total. 5 per day Moday -Friday 7:00 to 17:00 for Fire and Rescue Busiest Day: Slowest Day: Monday Busiest Hour: 14:00 to 15:00 Wednesday Slowest Hour: Total Calls: 370 No Responses: 84 Average Reaction Time: 3 minutes 12 seconds 'Note: Shaded areas represent career staff hours. 3:00 to 4:00 i• Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview • Station C10 All =All Stations Response (All) All =Total Dispatches, 0 =Number of No Responses DOW • Hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Grand Total 0 1 1 1 2 1 1 7 1 1 1 2 2 6 2 1 3 1 1 4 10 3 1 1 1 2 5 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 5 3 3 2 2 1 1 12 6 1 2 1 2 6 7 2 3 3 4 ~ 2 16 8 5 3 1 4 1 1 15 9 4 3 3 3 3 3 19 10 3 3 4 2 3 2 2 19 11 2 2 2 3 4 3 1 17 12 2 4 1 2 2 1 12 13 1 4 3 3 2 1 4 18 14 2 1 5 4 5 10 3 30 15 4 2 3 2 6 4 3 24 16 2 6 4 h 5 10 33 17 3 3 3 5 5 2 7 28 18 5 1 2 2 2 3 15 19 3 4 2 4 5 1 19 20 4 3 4 2 2 3 18 21 3 2 1 1 5 12 22 5 3 2 1 1 12 23 2 1 1 3 1 3 11 Grand Total 50 57 54 49 52 56 52 370 Total # of Calls (By Station) DOW =Day of Week (1 =Sunday) Hour (0 =Midnight) • Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview Station C10 All =All Stations Response 0 All =Total Dispatches, 0 =Number of No Responses DOW • C Hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Grand Total 0 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 4 3 1 2 3 4 1 1 1 3 5 1 2 1 1 5 6 2 2 7 1 1 1 1 4 8 3 1 1 1 6 9 1 2 2 2 7 10 1 1 2 11 1 1 1 3 12 1 1 2 13 1 1 2 14 1 1 2 15 2 2 4 16 1 1 2 1 5 17 1 1 1 1 4 18 2 2 19 1 1 2 1 5 20 1 2 2 5 22 4 1 2 7 23 1 3 4 Grand Total 12 15 12 13 14 7 11 84 Total # of Calls (By Station) DOW =Day of Week (1 =Sunday) Hour (0 =Midnight) Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview Station C10 DOW C7 Hour 1 ~ 3 4 5 6 7 Average 0 435 463 285 236 305 327 1 1011 349 458 569 2 455 450 454 454 3 360 370 365 4 458 490 286 411 5 385 319 486 385 415 394 6 301 269 77 181 7 452 101 154 145 0 458 205 8 418 95 54 0 569 195 9 62 204 0 111 42 46 90 10 279 73 115 99 68 106. 101 115 11 146 43 161 119 70 184 0 106 12 71 64 0 145 93 280 94 13 199 134 77 24 116 107 120 101 14 591 0 47 103 149 139 175 152 15 216 99 47 78 109 224 131 16 0 118 121 88 41 102 94 17 156 174 225 208 226 205 214 204 18 150 161 170 141 194 163 19 209 210 339 77 419 252 263 20 245 168 312 150 258 143 213 21 154 1682 270 218 248 463 22 0 100 279 208 137 23 0 290 348 355 280 283 Average 276 209 177 150 145 156 235 192 All values indicate the average number of seconds between Dispatched and EnRoute for the selected department. • • i• Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview By Station Catawba/Masons Cove Rescue Squad Rescue 10 Year Organized: 1982 Number of Volunteer Members: 30 Career Staff Busiest Day: *Staffing shared with Masons Cove Fire Department Wednesday Slowest Day: Thursday Busiest Hour: 16:00 to 17:00 Slowest Hour: 1:00 to 2:00 Total Calls: 513 No Responses: 67 Average Reaction Time: 3 minutes 6 seconds *Note: Shaded areas represent career staff hours. I• Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview Station R10 AlI _ All Stations Response (All) All =Total Dispatches, 0 =Number of No Responses DOW • Hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Grand Total 0 2 1 1 1 2 1 4 12 1 3 1 1 5 2 4 1 2 1 1 3 12 3 3 2 4 1 2 12 4 1 2 2 1 2 1 9 5 3 2 1 3 1 2 1 13 6 2 3 2 1 1 2 11 7 3 4 2 2 2 2 15 8 5 3 1 2 2 3 2 18 9 1 6 ~ 4 2 3 1 19 10 3 3 2 4 5 8 2 27 11 3 6 4 7 7 4 1 32 12 4 5 4 2 2 3 4 24 13 2 7 4 5 4 2 5 29 14 5 3 5 5 2 8 5 33 15 4 6 8 6 3 7 4 38 16 1 3 4 10 9 10 5 42 17 3 2 4 9 5 3 8 34 18 2 5 1 5 4 5 22 19 4 6 6 8 3 7 2 36 20 6 3 3 2 6 4 5 29 21 2 2 2 1 3 5 15 22 1 6 1 3 1 3 15 23 2 2 3 3 1 11 Grand Total 66 81 67 85 62 80 72 513 Total # of Calls (By Station) DOW =Day of Week (1 =Sunday) Hour (0 =Midnight) • Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview • Station R10 A11=All Stations Response 0 All =Total Dispatches, 0 =Number of No Responses DOW C, Hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Grand Total 0 1 1 2 2 2 1 3 3 1 1 2 1 1 6 4 1 1 1 2 5 5 2 2 2 2 8 6 1 2 2 5 8 1 1 9 1 1 10 1 1 2 11 1 1 2 4 12 2 2 14 1 1 2 15 1 2 1 1 5 16 2 2 1 5 17 1 2 1 4 18 1 1 2 19 1 2 1 1 1 6 20 1 1 21 1 1 22 1 1 23 1 1 Grand Total 11 9 11 1~ 9 8 6 h7 Total # of Calls (By Station) DOW =Day of Week (1 =Sunday) Hour (0 =Midnight) • Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview • Station R10 DOW • Hour 1 2 3' 4 5 ' 6 7 Average 0 518 309 549 542 313 284 389 1 238 390 357 292 2 232 186 369 0 258 456 284 3 368 773 593 384 513 4 709 676 1021 300 677 5 383 77 492 818 333 421 6 474 166 0 918 414 398 7 60 83 ' 170 169 104 386 145 8 496 '96 107 60 40 71 409 212 9 82 110 ' 23 26 96 109 244 86 10 360 89 96 b7 49 76 286 115 11 60 163 84 62 70 119 18 94 12 150 73 24 140 53 53 515 153 13 98 87 68 84 67 81 186 98 14 280 "47 149 50 0 65 300 140 15 197 110 95 159 121 106 155 127 16 80 .107 49 83 94 93 142 96 17 154 308 323 185 197 276 129 208 18 170 179 149 220 248 194 19 209 101 311 91 201 311 0 201 20 217 165 213 125 186 187 440 234 21 206 143 453 798 237 220 269 22 181 335 0 540 102 248 309 23 122 517 421 253 139 302 Average 257 1.57 179 156 147 149 271 186 All values indicate the average number of seconds between Dispatched and EnIZoute for the selected department. • i• I• Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview By Station Back Creek Fire Department Company 11 Year Organized: 1987 Number of Volunteer Members: 22 (Fire and Rescue) Career Staff: *0 -Rely on Volunteer Members Busiest Day: Friday Busiest Hour: Multiple Slowest Day: Saturday Slowest Hour: 3:00 to 4:00 Total Calls: 157 No Responses: Average Reaction Time: 5 minutes 26 seconds 'Note: Shaded areas represent career staff hours. 104 • Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview Station C11 All = All Stations Response (All) All =Total Dispatches, 0 =Number of No Responses DOW • Hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Grand Total 0 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 2 2 2 2 8 2 2 1 2 1 1 7 3 1 1 4 1 1 1 3 5 1 1 2 1 5 6 1 1 2 4 7 1 1 1 1 1 5 8 1 2 1 2 1 2 9 9 3 1 2 6 10 1 2 2 1 1 7 11 2 1 3 12 1 1 1 2 2 7 13 2 1 3 1 7 14 1 2 1 3 1 8 15 1 2 1 1 5 16 3 1 3 1 2 1 11 17 3 2 1 2 1 1 10 18 2 2 3 1 2 10 19 1 1 3 1 6 20 1 2 2 2 3 1 11 21 1 2 3 2 8 22 1 1 2 23 2 2 1 3 1 9 Grand Total 21 ` ' 23 22 23 24 _27 17 157 ''' Total # of Calls (By Station) DOW =Day of Week (1 =Sunday) Hour (0 =Midnight) • Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview Station C11 All =All Stations Response. 0 All =Total Dispatches, 0 =Number of No Pesponses DOW • Hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Grand Total 0 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 3 2 1 2 1 1 5 4 1 1 1 3 5 1 1 1 3 6 1 1 2 7 1 1 1 1 1 5 8 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 9 1 1 2 4 10 1 2 1 4 11 2 1 3 12 1 1 2 2 6 13 1 3 1 5 14 1 1 1 3 1 7 15 1 2 1 1 5 16 2 1 2 1 2 1 9 17 1 1 1 1 1 5 18 1 1 3 2 7 19 3 1 4 20 1 2 1 4 21 1 1 2 4 22 1 1 23 1 1 2 1 5 Grand Total 12 15 12 21 12 20 12 104 Total # of Calls (By Station) DOW =Day of Week (1 =Sunday) Hour (0 =Midnight) • Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview • Station C11 DOW • -Hour 1 ~ 3 4 5 6 7 Average 0 709 709 1 315 605 651 612 500 2 633 0 317 3 589 589 5 809 549 679 6 0 721 361 8 513 434 278 408 9 230 230 10 204 429 279 12 0 0 13 154 0 77 14 348 348 16 10 0 5 17 306 608 542 380 428 18 109 447 314 290 19 86 539 313 20 191 99 217 490 215 21 216 357 287 22 235 235 23 382 159 534 122 299 Average 212 301 256 204 401 409 462 326 All values indicate the average number of seconds between Dispatched and EnIZoute for the selected department. • i• i• Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview By Station Back Creek Rescue Squad Rescue 11 Year Organized: 1991 Number of Volunteer Members: 22 (Fire and Resuce) Career Staff: *0 -Rely on Volunteer Members Busiest Day: Sunday Busiest Hour: 18:00 to 19:00 Slowest Day: Saturday Slowest Hour: 6:00 to 7:00 Total Calls: 209 No Responses: 104 Average Reaction Time: 5 minutes 13 seconds 'Note: Shaded areas represent career staff hours. C, Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview • Station R11 All =All Stations Response (All) All =Total Dispatches, 0 =Number of No Responses DOW • Hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Grand Total 0 1 1 1 4 1 2 10 1 1 1 2 1 2 7 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 8 3 1 2 2 1 1 7 4 2 1 1 4 5 1 1 2 4 6 1 1 2 7 2 1 1 1 1 2 8 8 2 2 2 2 8 9 2 2 1 1 1 7 10 1 3 1 2 2 2 1 12 11 1 2 1 1 1 6 12 2 2 1 4 1 2 12 13 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 14 1 1 1 1 1 5 15 1 1 1 2 2 7 16 3 3 2 3 2 13 17 5 2 1 3 1 3 15 18 3 4 2 4 5 2 2 22 19 2 1 3 1 3 10 20 2 1 1 1 2 7 21 2 2 3 2 1 10 22 1 4 2 2 2 2 13 23 2 2 1 1 6 Grand Total 3i 28 35 26 32 26 25 209 Total # of Calls (By Station) DOW =Day of Week (1 =Sunday) Hour (0 =Midnight) • Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview Station R11 A11= .All Stations ..Response 0 All =Total Dispatches, ~ = Number. of No Responses DOW Hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Grand Total 0 1 3 4 1 1 2 3 2 1 1 2 3 1 1 1 3 4 1 1 5 1 1 2 6 1 1 2 7 1 1 1 1 4 8 2 2 2 6 9 1 2 1 1 5 10 2 2 1 2 1 8 11 1 1 2 12 1 2 1 4 1 9 13 1 1 1 1 4 14 1 1 1 1 4 15 1 2 3 16 1 1 2 2 2 8 17 3 1 2 2 8 18 2 4 1 1 3 2 13 19 1 1 2 20 1 1 21 1 2 1 4 22 1 1 1 2 5 23 1 1 Grand'Total '' `'14 16 ' 14 16 18 '13 1~ 104 '' Total # of Calls (By Station) DOW =Day of Week (1 =Sunday) Hour (0 =Midnight) • Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview • Station R11 DOW • Hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Average 0 158 0 0 497 224 184 1 593 453 646 536 557 2 400 467 904 410 790 562 3 476 935 565 848 706 4 314 830 486 5 501 532 517 7 630 0 130 348 8 352 352 9 436 452 444 10 329 519 338 0 297 11 309 242 6 504 265 12 0 352 43 132 13 730 680 705 14 460 460 15 476 110 394 344 16 626 134 94 322 17 371 211 227 309 276 282 18 0 505 334 97 405 279 19 118 54 31 461 166 149 20 159 941 108 618 434 21 0 51 272 153 22 0 37 140 189 116 93 23 76 131 59 51 90 Average 365 292 195 404 259 378 361 313 All values indicate the average number of seconds between Dispatched and EnRoute for the selected department. • i• i• Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview By Station Read Mountain Fire Department Company 12 Year Organized: 1991 Number of Volunteer Members: 62 (Fire and Rescue) Career Staff: *0 -Rely on Volunteer Members Busiest Day: Wednesday Busiest Hour: 18:00 -19:00 Slowest Day: Saturday Slowest Hour: 4:00 to 5:00 Total Calls: 417 No Responses: 73 Average Reaction Time: 1 minute 45 seconds 'Note: Shaded areas represent career staff hours. i• Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview • Station C12 All =All Stations. Response (All) All =Total Dispatches, 0 =Number of No Responses DOW Hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Grand Total 0 2 4 1 1 8 1 4 1 3 1 9 2 1 3 1 2 7 3 1 1 1 1 2 6 4 2 1 1 1 5 5 3 1 2 2 1 9 6 1 2 1 3 7 7 1 1 2 2 5 2 2 15 8 2 2 1 2 1 3 5 16 9 2 4 4 6 2 5 4 27 10 5 4 2 2 6 3 3 25 11 4 2 3 2 1 5 2 19 12 2 4 4 5 4 2 21 13 4 4 3 1 12 14 2 5 7 2 1 7 5 29 15 2 1 6 7 6 6 2 30 16 3 5 1 4 4 7 2 26 17 2 4 5 3 5 3 1 23 18 2 4 6 9 6 2 3 32 19 2 3 3 8 4 4 2 26 20 4 2 4 2 4 6 2 24 21 1 3 3 7 1 1 2 18 22 2 1 1 4 2 1 11 23 2 2 2 2 2 2 12 .Grand Total 48 50 65 7i h6 67 44 417 Total # of Calls (By Station) DOW =Day of Week (1 =Sunday) Hour (0 =Midnight) • Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview Station C12 All =All Stations Pesponse 0 All = TotaLDispatches, 0 =Number of No Responses DOW` • .Hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Grand Total 1 1 1 2 1 1 3 1 1 5 2 2 6 1 1 2 4 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 8 1 2 3 9 2 1 1 2 2 8 10 1 1 2 1 1 1 7 11 1 1 2 4 12 2 2 2 6 14 1 1 1 2 5 15 1 1 1 3 16 1 1 17 1 1 1 1 4 18 1 1 19 1 2 1 1 5 20 1 1 1 1 4 21 1 1 1 3 22 1 1 23 1 1 1 3 Grand Total 8 8 14 11 13 11 8 73 Total # of Calls (By Station) DOW =Day of Week (1 =Sunday) Hour (0 =Midnight) Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview • Station C12 DOW • Hour 1 ~ 3 4 5 6 7 Average 0 0 199 110 57 120 1 164 177 0 0 84 2 130 105 266 13 105 3 194 596 0 80 190 4 169 404 218 0 192 5 62 246 126 0 98 6 0 0 0 0 7 0 159 43 0 126 68 8 67 281 0 0 0 81 85 9 101 0 176 140 137 93 116 10 64 72 187 355 183 126 180 11 163 307 166 299 0 34 123 149 12 141 98 0 90 186 112 13 41 227 226 86 153 14 58 302 262 0 181 23 176 15 248 212 30 44 180 168 0 113 16 14 77 9 83 245 102 0 94 17 0 115 41 87 126 59 0 72 18 13 124 69 96 57 63 0 70 19 0 0 93 66 0 0 167 36 20 151 68 23 5 102 17 0 58 21 88 74 133 88 0 0 91 22 152 198 0 163 0 9 101 23 0 57 0 180 205 104 101 A~~erage 83 140 98 111 133 102 51 105 All values indicate the average number of seconds between Dispatched and EnRoute for the selected department. • ~i i• Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview By Station Read Mountain Rescue Squad Rescue 12 Year Organized: 1991 Number of Volunteer Members: 62 (Fire and Rescue) Career Staff: *0 -Rely on Volunteer Members Busiest Day: Thursday Slowest Day: Friday Busiest Hour: Multiple Slowest Hour: 2:00 to 3:00 Total Calls: 543 No Responses: Average Reaction Time: 2 minutes 55 seconds Note: Shaded areas represent career staff hours. 147 i• Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview • Station ' R12 All =All Stations Pesponse (All) All =Total Dispatches, 0 =Number of No Responses DOW • Hour. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Grand Total 0 4 4 3 1 12 1 5 1 6 2 3 17 2 2 1 2 1 1 3 10 3 2 2 1 4 5 2 2 18 4 3 4 4 1 3 2 1 18 5 2 1 2 3 3 2 1 14 6 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 12 7 2 1 6 2 7 1 2 21 8 6 3 3 6 4 4 26 9 5 6 3 6 5 6 4 35 10 4 3 3 2 9 4 5 30 11 4 6 4 2 1 3 6 26 12 3 2 4 8 2 3 4 26 13 3 4 2 2 2 3 2 18 14 4 5 4 3 6 6 7 35 15 3 3 6 8 7 5 4 36 16 6 7 5 3 3 8 4 36 17 4 5 8 2 8 2 2 31 18 2 5 5 4 6 1 3 26 19 4 3 1 5 4 3 3 23 20 5 4 3 4 3 5 1 25 21 1 3 4 6 2 1 2 19 22 2 2 2 3 1 2 12 23 3 1 2 5 2 2 2 17 Grand Total 69 76 82 81 97 68 70 543 Total # of Calls (By Station) DOW =Day of Week (1 =Sunday) Hour (0 =Midnight) Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview • Station R12 All =All Stations Response 0 All =Total Dispatches, 0 =Number of No Responses DOW Hour 1 2 3 .4 5 6 7 Grand Total 0 2 1 1 4 1 2 4 1 1 8 2 1 1 3 2 1 1 4 4 1 1 1 3 5 1 1 2 1 1 1 7 6 1 1 2 2 6 7 1 1 2 4 8 4 1 2 2 1 10 9 2 1 1 1 2 7 10 2 1 4 2 2 11 11 2 1 2 3 2 10 12 2 4 1 2 9 13 1 1 2 1 5 14 1 1 2 2 4 1 11 15 5 2 1 8 16 1 3 1 4 1 10 17 1 1 2 1 5 18 2 2 1 1 6 19 1 1 1 3 20 2 1 2 5 21 1 3 1 5 22 1 1 23 1 1 1 1 4 Grand Total 12 15 19 25 30 27 19 147 Total # of Calls (By Station) DOW =Day of Week (1 =Sunday) Hour (0 =Midnight) • Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Response Overview • Station R12 DOW • Hour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Average 0 144 273 78 0 158 1 364 385 96 385 98 250 2 194 175 317 0 66 155 3 103 296 215 419 179 134 252 4 239 250 369 281 143 131 270 5 174 169 295 233 532 258 6 112 328 382 150 0 187 7 150 415 148 648 171 299 180 213 8 522 227 300 258 56 130 241 9 124 65 285 177 228 244 107 169 10 212 308 531 161 136 144 91 209 11 312 239 224 187 207 243 12 0 332 103 194 0 161 196 151 13 58 337 71 324 0 245 0 172 14 148 59 579 165 101 40 130 150 15 172 27 128 318 384 182 84 189 16 76 141 21 108 143 229 358 154 17 65 72 63 166 116 39 78 84 18 111 211 18 118 109 75 158 125 19 .120 50 192 106 133 196 30 111 20 42 217 10 71 270 70 116 122 21 194 74 292 70 289 47 170 156 22 391 204 428 220 251 103 269 23 133 215 93 117 178 148 122 133 Average 144 184 '''208 187 `189 170 132 175 All values indicate the average number of seconds between Dispatched and EnRoute for the selected department. • ~-y Revenue Recovery A Report on Ambulance Transport Fees Roanoke County Fire & Rescue Department Anne Marie Green Community Relations Director • Table of Contents Introduction Current Funding Why Charge? 1 2 2 Who in Virginia Charges for Ambulance Services 4 Proposed Roanoke County Program 6 Gaining Roanoke County Citizens Acceptance 8 Summary References 9 10 • I:~~ra~uction Emergency medical services (EMS) in Roanoke County are currently provided by eleven independent EMS agencies licensed by the Commonwealth of Virginia. Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Department serves as the lead coordinator for the EMS System as well as one of the EMS agencies. Volunteer rescue squads and volunteer fire/rescue companies make up the ten additional agencies. The EMS system in Roanoke County has a long and proud tradition of volunteerism, and the first department in Southwest Virginia to establish cross-trained career paramedic/firefighter personnel. Emergency calls are received and dispatched by the Roanoke County Police Department's Communication Center. Currently, there are twenty-four ambulances in Roanoke County that are all equipped to provide basic and • advanced life support. A basic life support (BLS) ambulance is referred to as a "Rescue Unit" where an advanced life support (ALS) unit is referred to as a "Medic Unit". The determining factor is what level of certification the ambulance crew has. Staffing of a "Rescue Unit" requires at least one EMT-Basic provider serving as the primary care giver (attendant in charge). A "Medic Unit" requires the minimum of one EMT-Cardiac or EMT-Paramedic serving as the primary care giver and one EMT-Basic. Career personnel staff ALS units only and volunteers primarily staff BLS units based on the availability of volunteer ALS personnel. The Virginia Department of Health licenses all EMS agencies in the Commonwealth of Virginia. Each EMS agency operates within the regulations set forth by the Commonwealth. A physician that has expertise in emergency medicine is required to serve as the EMS agency's Medical Director. The Medical Director establishes guidelines (protocols) that each EMS provider follows when treating ill or injured patients. Each rescue squad operates under • their organization's by-laws and protocols separate from the County's oversight. Roanoke C~a+ntt~ Fire c~ Rescue Departr7+ent 1 Reve+at+e Recove+y March 3, 2000 ~ur~-enf Funding Roanoke County provides funding to the volunteer EMS agencies in a number of fashions. All Rescue Squad stations are owned and maintained by Roanoke County with a few exceptions; Vinton Rescue Squad is independent, Cave Spring Rescue Squad operates on a 50/50 agreement, and Read Mountain Rescue Squad's expenses are split 50/50 with Botetourt County. Fourteen out of the twenty-four ambulances are owned and maintained by the County. Fuel for all equipment, insurance (both for vehicles and personnel), a retirement program and allocated monies to purchase medical supplies are some of the direct expenses provided to the rescue squads by the County. Administrative support, logistical support, and training are just a sample of other indirect expenses that the County provides to supplement the Volunteer Rescue Squads. In addition, the County and individual volunteer organizations apply for various grants and the volunteer organizations routinely conduct fund drives to raise donations. • The County also provides daylight staffing Monday through Friday at six stations through out Roanoke County. The career personnel that staff the stations are either EMT/Firefighters or Paramedic/Firefighters. Career personnel staff six ALS ambulances (Medic Units), six fire engines, and two ladder trucks. The fire apparatus have ALS equipment on them and are usually staffed with at least one Paramedic/Firefighter. Fire apparatus respond to life threatening emergencies and can initiate ALS care while waiting for the ambulance to arrive. why Charge for Arnbulanc~ Transporks? Providing Emergency Medical Services (EMS) creates significant costs for Roanoke County. Vehicles and equipment become more expensive every year. The technological advances in the health care field have allowed for specialized medical equipment to be used in the pre-hospital setting. Evasive cardiac • monitoring devices, advanced surgical airways and over twenty-five medications Roanok:e C~unh~ Fire & Rescue Department 2 Revenzre Recover- March 3. ?000 are carried on an ambulance in Roanoke County. The cost of training and the • education requirements for a person to become an advanced life support (ALS) provider have also increased, placing further demands on the County's volunteers. In spite of increased costs, the services that are provided by Roanoke County's EMS providers both career and volunteer are critically important to our citizens and visitors. Our communities throughout Roanoke County demand and deserve a high level of performance from their emergency services. Charging a fee for ambulance transports can be one stable and effective method to fund the kind of EMS services that the public expects. An effective reimbursement program (Revenue Recovery) can turn the tables, giving Roanoke County a mechanism to set fees, which can sustain the level of service needed and desired by the citizens. • Just as revenues are becoming a bigger and bigger problem, EMS response is becoming increasingly expensive. In recent years Hepatitis B vaccination programs, increased mandatory training, rising insurance premiums, and equipment prices have all made the business of caring for patients in the field much more expensive than it used to be. The increased training requirements have impacted our recruitment and retention program, thus requiring more career staffing to maintain current levels of service. Finally, we should consider the return on the energy our volunteer agencies put into fundraising. Countless volunteer organizations count on pancake breakfasts, raffles, fundraising campaigns, and other activities to generate substantial parts of their annual operating budgets. Many of these efforts take months to organize, consuming many hours of staff and leadership time and have substantial up-front costs. Some ventures run the risk of financial loss and only net a few hundred dollars. • Roanoke Cow~h~ Fire c~ Rescue Deparhner~t ~ Rei~enue Reconen~ ~Iarcl~ 3. ?000 In contrast, a volunteer ambulance crew can spend an hour or two on a 911 call, • something that they already do. The time spent by sending a bill to an insurance company can be as little as a few minutes. Within a few weeks the County could typically receive a check for $300 or more for that one response. "Billing for ambulance service is much like being billed for a visit to the doctor's office or emergency room," said David Smith, Executive Director, Regional Emergency Medical Services, (911 Service for Pulaski County). Mr. Smith further states, "first, the patient receives the care, then they sign a form authorizing a bill to go to their insurance company. The insurance company pays their share and then the patient is notified of any remaining balance". Depending on the EMS agency's policies, the balance does not need to be pursued if the individual is unable to pay. t~/h© in Virginia Charges forAmbulance e~vices • The Virginia Association of Volunteer Rescue Squads (VAVRS) recently changed their by-laws (1998) to allow for volunteer rescue squads to charge for their services. "The volunteer rescue squads and other EMS agencies in Virginia are not billing for services to make money," said Kevin Dillard, past President of VAVRS. He goes on to say, "in most cases, it just helps to defray some of the expenses." The list on the following page (page 5) illustrates the different parts of Virginia where EMS agencies charge for transport services. "Providing quality emergency medical services is expensive. A fully equipped ALS ambulance can cost between $90,000. - $100,000.00," said Gary Brown, Director of Virginia's Office of EMS of the Virginia Department of Health. "With increased costs and limited resources, it is important to look at all funding options to help offset the expenses of providing a quality pre-hospital patient care." The trend of charging for ambulance service continues to grow across America with 62% of all EMS agencies charging for their services. Considering that 84% of all • Americans have some type of health insurance and 98% of all seniors have a Roanoke Cocrnty Fire ce Resccre Department 4 Revenue Reconen~ March 3, ?000 form of health insurance it is only natural to pursue ambulance fees according to • Rohn Brown, EMS Recruitment and Retention Coordinator (Office of EMS, Virginia Department of Health). EMS Agencies in Virginia That Bill for Services 1. Alexandria Fire-EMS 2. Arlington County Fire Department 3. Bristol Lifesaving Crew 4. Chesapeake Fire Department -EMS 5. Chincoteague Volunteer Fire & Rescue 6. City of Lynchburg Fire Department • 7. City of Newport News Fire-EMS 8. City of Norfolk Fire & Paramedical Services 9. Franklin City Fire & Rescue 10. Giles Lifesaving & Rescue Squad 11. Halifax County Rescue Squad 12. Marion Rescue Squad 13. Northhampton County Fire & Rescue 14. Portsmouth Fire, Rescue & Emergency Services 15. Regional EMS, Inc. (Pulaski County) 16. Rescue 945 (Tazewell County) 17. Richmond Ambulance Authority 18. Roanoke City Fire & EMS • Roanoke County Fire c~ Resccte Department ~ Career Combination All Volunteer Combination All Volunteer Career Career Career Combination All Volunteer Combination All Volunteer Combination Career Combination Combination Career Combination Reti~enue Reconen~ March 3, ?000 • 19. Southside Emergency Crew 20. Tazewell Lifesaving Crew All Volunteer Ail Volunteer • Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Department transports approximately 4000 patients a year to local hospitals. Currently, there are no fees imposed on the patient for this service. Since 1992 there has been a 58% increase in EMS calls in Roanoke County. The increase in transports is a national trend with more Americans using 911 services. Roanoke County has a high concentration of tax- exempt nursing home facilities that do not subsidize the County's EMS program with tax revenue but generate approximately 15% of all EMS calls. A majority of all patients transported by Roanoke County personnel have some type of health insurance. A bill can be charged for these transportation fees to help fund the County's EMS requirements. According to the 1980 and 1990 U.S. Census, there has been a 52.3% increase in people age 65 and older living in Roanoke County. Our Department estimates that our EMS call volume will continue to grow at a rate approximately 4% per year. Roanoke County has experienced a dramatic increase in auto accidents on Interstate 81 over the last three years. I-81 is also scheduled to be widened in the Roanoke County area, which will ultimately mean more motor vehicle accidents for our organization to respond to. Most automobile insurance policies usually have provisions to cover ambulance transport fees in the event that the insured is involved in a car accident. Lastly, the majority of all senior citizens have some type of health insurance that revenue can be recovered from. The proposed program would establish user fees for ambulance transportation service. A fee for basic life support (BLS) and advanced life support (ALS) service would be implemented along with a base fee for transport mileage. The Roanoke Cozulh~ Frre & Rescue Department 6 Renetrue Recoi~en- ~l~larch 3, ?000 ~J • • proposed fee structure was determined by comparing other EMS agencies in Southwest Virginia that charge for comparable ambulance services. It should be noted that the projected figures are based on the amount of ALS and BLS calls. In order to charge for ALS transport fees there needs to be an ALS provider attending to the patient. Currently, our system does not ensure this level of service. An increase in ALS providers will be necessary to achieve the projected revenue. Listed below are the amounts that five regional EMS agencies charge for their services and the proposed charges that Roanoke County would implement for ambulance transport fees. Roanoke REMSI GILES Carillon Lifeline Roanoke City (Pulaski) Volunteer Transport Ambulance County Fire/EMS* Rescue Service Service PROPOSED BLS $145.00 $240.00 $150.00 $185.00 $300.00 $165.00 ALS $290.00 $340.00 $250.00 $482.00 $450.00 $310.00 Per loaded $7.00 $5.00 $4.00 $6.25 $9.00 $5.00 mile Net 1,109,264 $456,000 $165,000 N/A N/A N/A Recovered Revenue Roanoke City has requested price changes effective July 151 equivalent to Roanoke County's proposed fees. Projected Recovered Revenue Basic Life Support (BLS) Advance Life Support (ALS) $347,770.00 (NET) $213,745.00 (NET) Mileage $80,000.00 (NET) TOTAL $641, 515.00 (NET) Roanoke Coza~h~ Fire ~ Rc>scue Department 7 Revenue Recoven~ d~Iarch 3, ?000 The recovered revenue will be used to address equipment, staffing concerns and • loss of revenue to volunteer rescue squads that can document declines in donations which effects operational readiness of the organization. ~a~rtin~ #~oana~ce aunty ~i~izens Acceptance Myth 1: "Our community would never support us charging for responses" Myth 2: "If we started charging, our donations would dry up" Myth 3: "The current volunteers will all quit" These are just a few of the many assumptions that seem to arise when charging for ambulance services is discussed in Roanoke County. There's much that can be done to cultivate community support for a new fee structure. There will be some in any community who will fight any new fee, charge, assessment, or tax. But using some or all of these methods can generate widespread support: • - Involve the community in the process in a meaningful way. - Publicize Roanoke County's process and plans well, and take advantage of every opportunity to speak with the public about the program. Inform the public why these fees are important. Y Introduce fees with a substantial improvement in services. A twelve-month education program that focuses on why ambulance transport fees are necessary for both the public and EMS personnel should be instituted before any transport fee begins. "If you are going to bill for services, you have to have a real good public education campaign," according to VAVRS past President Kevin Dillard. Rob Logan, Executive Director of the Western Virginia EMS Regional Council in Roanoke states "The most important part is to educate the public, the local government and the EMS agencies." James City County, Virginia is one of the only EMS systems in the • Commonwealth of Virginia who was unsuccessful in instituting a fee based EMS Roanoke Counh- Fire & Rescare Deparhnent 8 Revenue Recovery March 3, 2000 system. They had a very short time period of public education to inform the public • why a charge needed to be established. They contribute their failure to the fact that they rushed a program that the general public was not familiar with. An education program in Roanoke County would take approximately one year along with establishing a fee based system that is acceptable by all concerned groups. Benefits of Ambulance Transport Fees • New or increased taxes can be avoided • As call volume increases, revenue increases in proportion • Increased revenues for training, equipment, personnel, and community programs • Funding can be more stable • Costs are shifted to those using the service • Frivolous or abusive calls can be reduced • Service improvements may occur which benefit everyone • ~~mmarr The cost of providing emergency medical services to the citizens and visitors of Roanoke County continues to increase. The rise in expenses is due to a higher call volume along with increased public expectations. Charging ambulance transport fees shifts the cost to those using the service not spreading the cost to citizens not using the service. By establishing a user fee, volunteer organizations can concentrate on responding to 911 emergencies and training activities. The recovered revenue can be used to maintain and improve current services that the Fire & Rescue Department provides. Before Roanoke County initiates any type of ambulance fee program an in depth public education program must be done. • Roanoke Counfl- Fire & Rescue Department 9 Revenue Recovers- Marcia 3. 2000 • L~ • . .. ........................... _... _.._ _. Gary R. Brown, Director -Office of EMS, Virginia Department of Health 1538 East Parham Rd. Richmond, VA 23228 Billing For Services: A Funding Option For Volunteer EMS Agencies, 1998, Rohn M. Brown, EMS Recruitment and Retention Coordinator -Office of EMS, Virginia Department of Health. Kevin Dillard, past President, Virginia Association of Volunteer Rescue Squads C/0 Life Care Medical Transports, Inc. 1170 International Parkway, Fredericksburg, VA 22406. A Guide to Funding Alternatives for Fire and Emergency Medical Service Departments, Federal Emergency Management Agency/United States Fire Administration, FA141/December 1993. David Smith, Executive Director, Regional Emergency Medical Services, Inc. P.O. Box 949, 101 Dublin Park Rd Dublin, VA 24084. Roanoke Counh~ Fire & Rescare Department 10 Revenue Recoven~ Nlarcla 3, 2000 Action No. Item Number J° AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 14, 2000 AGENDA ITEM: Consideration of a method for funding improvements to Fire and Rescue response times and Fire and Rescue buildings and purchases of equipment by the use of fees for Emergency Medical Services COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This is a proposal to charge fees for emergency medical services to improve response times, make improvements to Fire and Rescue building and purchase equipment. The proposed program focuses on informing the public over a year's time, instituting a charge for ambulance transports, establishing a fee rate, initiating revenue to supplement fire and rescue operations, and discussing the impact on the citizens of Roanoke County. More information on the proposal is included in the Board's agenda packet. FISCAL IMPACT: Anticipated revenue from proposed fee schedule based on volume of ALS and BLS calls is $641,515.00 Net. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends moving forward with the proposed funding program for EMS service and utilizing the revenue to make improvements to fire and rescue operations. Submitted by: Approv d by: Richard E. Burch, Jr. Elmer C. Hodge Chief, Fire and Rescue County Administrator ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To () Motion by: Johnson Church McNamara Minnix Nickens w 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. P-5 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 14, 2000 AGENDA ITEM: Worksession on Cluster Housing Ordinance. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND' At your worksession on February 29, 2000, the Board requested that the staff address two issues associated with the proposed cluster ordinance. First, some members of the Board expressed interest that cluster subdivisions would be allowed in the "middle" of conventional single family subdivisions such as Penn Forest, North Lakes, Montgomery Village, etc. To address this issue, staff has proposed a minor amendment to the ordinance to prohibit cluster developments within "Planned Residential Subdivisions" (See Page 3 of the ordinance.) This definition of Planned Residential Subdivision (enclosed) is currently adopted as part of the zoning ordinance and has been effectively used to prohibit manufactured homes from locating within the limits of established subdivisions. If included as part of the cluster ordinance, no cluster development could be proposed on any three acre or greater lot that was legally platted as part of a formal subdivision as defined. The Board also requested information on the location and number of all three acre or larger parcels that would be available for cluster developments. The staff has prepared a tabulation and location map that shows all R-1, R-2, R-3 and R-4 parcels, three acres or greater in size, that have a building value of less than $5,000. We used this building value as an indicator of vacancy. This analysis produced the following data: ~J-5 2 Land Available for Cluster Developments (Number of Parcels and Total Acreage by Zoninq District) Zoninq District ~ of Parcels Total Acres R-1 359 5,284 R-2 28 477 R-3 21 267 R-4 0 0 Totals 408 6,028 This analysis shows that most of the parcels eligible for cluster are zoned R-l. Map analysis also shows that most of the 408 eligible parcels are outside of established subdivisions, or in less developed areas of the county. The produced map does not take into account the availability of public water and sewer. This map has been placed in your office. Larger scaled versions of the map will be available at your worksession on the 14th STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: 1. That the Board hold a worksession on the cluster housing ordinance on March 14, 2000 Respectfully Submitted, Approved, (~~~ Terrance L. ar ton, AICP Elmer C. Hodge Departmen of Community Development County Administrator Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received Referred to Motion by Vote No Yes Abs Church Johnson McNamara Minnix Nickens ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~ 6 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 14, 2000 AGENDA ITEM: Work Session on County Administration Goals (Continued from February 8, 2000) COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: At the February 8, 2000 meeting, the Board of Supervisors held a work session on review of the 1999 County Administration Goals. The Board was unable to complete the work session at that meeting, and this time has been set aside to review the remaining goals. Submitted by: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE No. Yes Abs Approved () Motion by: Church Denied () Johnson _ Received () McNamara- _ _ Referred () Minnix _ _ _ To () Nickens _ _ _ '~ `~'' County Administration FY 2000 The County Administration and Assistant County Administrators manage the daily operations of Roanoke County government and serve in an advisory capacity to the Board of Supervisors. Mission The County Administration will execute uniformly the policies established by the Board of Supervisors, advise and recommend to the Board actions that meet the changing needs of citizens, administer the daily operations of government, and present a balanced annual budget for consideration by the Board. CORE GOAL: TO PROVIDE THE BOARD WITH ACCURATE, TIMELY INFORMATION ON WHICH TO BASE ITS DECISIONS. Objectives: To formulate effective bimonthly Board meeting agendas that provide a structure to address pertinent issues and to serve best the interests of county residents and business. To keep the Board constantly appraised of community events and County projects and services. To provide the Board with strategic information that enhances decision-making. / Added periodic status reports on County projects to agenda. / Agendas and Action Agendas are now on the Board of Supervisors Web Site. / Investigating a computerized Citizen Complaint systems currently in several Virginia localities. / Computerized index of Board actions and minutes available for research CORE GOAL: TO FACILITATE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT THAT INCREASES THE NUMBER AND QUALITY OF JOBS AVAILABLE TO RESIDENTS OF ROANOKE COUNTY AND THE ROANOKE VALLEY. Objectives: To prepare the Center for Research and Technology for marketing which includes water, sewer, access road, and entrance-way to secure initial occupant(s). To identify and recruit occupants for other economic development projects including existing businesses, Palley Gateway Business Park, McDonald Farm, and Palley TechPark. To update long-term economic development strategies identifying development sites, means for acquisition, and potential effects on the local economy. To promote tourism as an economic development opportunity including the start of construction of a new Parkway Interpretive Center. Center for Research & Technologv / The water line construction is 30% complete on Glenmary Drive. / Borings are being completed for the sewer line on Glenvar Heights Boulevard. / Bids for the Entrance Road at the end of Glenmary Drive were opened on Wednesday, February 2, 2000. / Marketing brochure is being printed Valley Gateway Business Park / Shell Building is currently under contract to Dragon Chemical. McDonald Farm / Has been rezoned to Planned Technology Development District. Valley Techpark / With the location announcements of Lincra, USA and Salem Vent, Valley Techpark is officially at capacity. Tourism Development Blue Ridge Parkway Interpretative Center / Conducted an interior study and applied for TEA 21 grant. / Bids for construction have been received and are being reviewed. Target, Identify and Recruit Companies for other proiects / Existing Industry Visitation Program: Economic Development's program of visiting major industries and large service firms continues to connect staff with companies to identify expansion opportunities and strengthen working relationships. CORE GOAL: TO PROMOTE AHIGH-QUALITY, EFFICIENT SCHOOL SYSTEM THROUGH COOPERATION AND INTERACTION WITH THE ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD AND ADMINISTRATION Objectives: To work in partnership with the School Board and administration to make the best use of available funds in providing cost effective educational opportunities for the children of Roanoke County. To implement fully, in conjunction with the School Board, the Blue Ribbon Committee's Phase I School Construction Program including identification and provision of essential funds necessary for operations and capital expenses related to the new construction. / Will update debt schedules and present financial plan to the School Board and Board of Supervisors within 30 days. CORE GOAL: TO DEVELOP INNOVATIVE FISCAL AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES TO ENSURE THAT ROANOKE COUNTY HAS A HIGH LEVEL OF PUBLIC SAFETY. 2 Objectives: To maintain the number of volunteer hours for fire and rescue services. To pursue alternative revenue sources to enhance fire and rescue services. / Reviewed our recruitment and retention program. / Increased Recruitment and Retention budget by 45%. / Co-sponsoring a 1-day seminar on recruitment and retention with the State Fire Chiefs Association of Virginia to be held in Roanoke during the month of March. / Develop a strategic plan and implement in July. / Work Session planned with Board of Supervisors on March 14`h on potential revenues sources. CORE GOAL: TO RECRUIT AND RETAIN INNOVATIVE AND EFFECTIVE PERSONNEL FOR ROANOKE COUNTY WHILE MAINTAINING THE EXISTING NUMBER OF FULL TIME EQUIVALENT EMPLOYEES Objectives: To develop and implement an employee performance appraisal system that establishes accountabilities for each employee related to the organizational and departmental missions and goals. Conduct market research as necessary to ensure competitive salary and benefit levels enabling the County to recruit and retain effective employees. To educate employees about their full compensation package. / Pilot program on the proposed appraisal system was conducted with a select group of supervisors. System was implemented in fall of 1998. / Developing a letter to send to the employees that lists the dollar amount of all the benefits that are provided for them. / The Roanoke Health Insurance Consortium is in the process of bidding joint health insurance for the Roanoke Valley. / Benefit information and the Classification Plan is now on the Intranet / Human Resources has reviewed market survey data for year 2000 to determine competitiveness of Roanoke County classification plan and benefits. CORE GOAL: TO ENGAGE IN COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH REGIONAL ENTITIES THAT IMPROVE SERVICE LEVELS OR LOWER THE COST OF SERVICE PROVISION. Objectives To facilitate solutions to regional water and sewer issues that will reduce the current rates paid by Roanoke County residents. To negotiate proactive solutions to long-range water issues with surrounding localities, eliminating case-by-case negotiations in times of crisis that will benefit the entire 3 valley. To examine the potential benefits from regionalization of other services (e.g., solid waste, fire and rescue, library, etc.). Water and Sewer Issues / The regional wastewater plant/interceptor project is coming to a close. Plant construction is complete and the interceptor sewer line is scheduled to be completed by the first part of April. / Roanoke City was able to obtain needed source capacity, while Roanoke County obtained transmission capabilities and eliminated the required purchase of water. / These changes will allow Roanoke County to have a water rate reduction beginning in July 2000 / Roanoke County is actively participating with Roanoke City, City of Salem, Town of Vinton, Botetourt County (possibly Bedford County) and the Roanoke Valley-Alleghany Regional Commission to develop a Roanoke Valley Regional Long-Range Water Supply. Solid Waste / Reviewed project plan, current services, factors affecting current service delivery, and factors affecting the success of a regional collection system. / Evaluated each localities current solid waste collection practices using focus groups and site visits. / R. W. Beck presented findings/observations from focus groups and site visits at January meeting. / R. W. Beck will present cost model, analysis of each localities three scenarios and develop overview of regional service system characteristics and issues in February. CORE GOAL: TO COORDINATE MASTER PLANNING, COMMERCIAL ZONING, AND SERVICE DELIVERY CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING FUTURE TRANSPORTATION INITIATIVES. Objectives To master plan all existing and proposed interstate interchanges to maximize economic development potential in the county. To determine the impact on service delivery and quality of life issues from the proposed widening of Interstate-81 and proposed construction of Interstate-73. / Dixie Caverns/I-81 interchange study (Exit 132): Analyzed existing land use conditions, convened citizen focus group to recommend alternative future land use designations. / Drafting guidelines to allow additional vacant land to be designated industrial 4 ~~ / Hanging Rock/I-81 interchange study (Exit 141): Analyzed existing land use conditions, convened citizen focus group to recommend guidelines. / Hollins/Plantation Road/I-81 interchange (Exit 146): Initial community meeting held on January 24. Schedule is to be completed by end of June 2000. 5 Attachment 1 c Projected Sources -Uses of New Revenues 2000-2001 Budget Projections Revenues Real Estate Tax Personal Property Tax Sales Tax BPOL Tax Cellular Phone Tax Meals Tax Other Less designated revenues School Revenues County School Total 2,085,000 2,085,000 1,550,000 1,550,000 140,000 140,000 110,000 110,000 50,000 50,000 265,000 265,000 510, 880 510, 880 2,432,271 2,432,271 4,710,880 2,432,271 7,143,151 Personnel Costs (Does not include operational budget items VRS Rates County rate decrease from 12.96% to 10.86%) School rate increase from 14.04% to 14.61%) Life insurance (LY was a premium holiday) Health insurance increase (25% increase for the Co/ Schools and 25% increase for employees) Dental insurance increase County employees School employees Salary increases (3%) School 1% _ $749,000 County 1% _ $325,000 Reserved for new school operations Balance to fund other needs School revenue sources State revenues Dental insurance transfer Local appropriation (429,975) (429,975) 325,000 325,000 207,000 460,000 667,000 492,653 1,125, 358 1,618, 011 14,280 14,280 31,572 31,572 2,247,000 2,247,000 975, 000 975, 000 1,258,958 4,188,930 5,447,888 1,500,000 6,947,888 97,632 97,632 195,263 1,356,590 4,286,562 7,143,151 2,432,271 31,572 1, 822, 719 4,286, 562 Attachment 1 d Projected Sources -Uses of New Revenues 2000-2001 Budget Projections Revenues Real Estate Tax Personal Property Tax Sales Tax BPOL Tax Cellular Phone Tax Meals Tax Other Less designated revenues School Revenues County School Total 2,085,000 2,085,000 1, 550, 000 1, 550, 000 140,000 140,000 110, 000 110, 000 50, 000 50, 000 265,000 265,000 510, 880 510, 880 2,432,271 2,432,271 4,710,880 2,432,271 7,143,151 Personnel Costs (Does not include operational budget items) VRS Rates County rate decrease from 12.96% to 10.86%) (429,975) (429,975) School rate increase from 14.04% to 14.61 %) 325,000 325,000 Life insurance (LY was a premium holiday) 207,000 460,000 667,000 Health insurance increase (9% increase for the Co/ Schools and 75% increase for employees) Dental insurance increase County employees School employees Salary increases (4%) School 1 % _ $749,000 County 1% _ $325,000 167,653 376,358 544,011 14,280 14,280 31,572 31,572 2,996,000 2,996,000 1, 300,000 1, 300,000 Reserved for new school operations Balance to fund other needs School revenue sources State revenues Dental insurance transfer Local appropriation 1,258,958 4,188,930 5,447,888 1,500, 000 6, 947, 888 97,632 97,632 195,263 1,356,590 4,286,562 7,143,151 2,432,271 31, 572 1, 822, 719 4,286,562 N_ 8 t H ~ O R ca 3 = O ~ U .~ Y ~ C ~ =aR ° ~c a .~. ~ ~ U O ~ ++ ~ w C y C ~ m U U ,~°" ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ s r~ m m ~ d A m A m A m ~ m ~ m A m A m ~, ~ H ~ A ~ m $ m , ~.~ ~ C N C O Z N C ~ M N = O Z N C N C N C N C N C , C C ;~~ ~ ~ ~ COI U -'' p U U U U U U U U , H a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 «Y~ ~ M M COf S M S COI - COI M ~~ ~ ~'~"' o e o o e m p o o m ee ~ p pp p m N ~ a n n ~' '" _ T '~ a n n v m /~} (( c us ~ is ~ m A ~ o o m m a is m a _ a~ °u ~ U U H o Q ~ ` Vri'? Z ~ C ~ S ~m , y_ ~A IA m m U m m m U m IA O O N Z o `. H - U U U U H O U U ~~~ M (I ~ t~ C ~ ~ O 'O a m m •-• m ` p : ~~ O « h ~ m c ~ a 'o' $ ~ m ` m a o ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ t~ 0 o u QS c - ~ ~ O I C N C m C i' U 0." i' < C ~ C H +~~t' N `O O ~ ~ A Z ~6 ~ i71 yy A N A O O ~6 t0 A> i7 > b4 d! N Z C) _ ~<', H N N O N N N N N t-C': N IA > ~:-X. ... ~ . . (,. m _~ ~'~~ O v -o 'd v -d v ^, v ~. , ~ g g m D n m - D ~ O ~ c D O ' O o N 0 y '- (/ J ( ' ~~ H ~ t m , U O S ~- ~ m m m 0 T a~ m m M1 m U N ' m N b , T ~ i ~ 00 8 - ,~ ~~ N O U IA V! p C' l0 C /6 C l0 C ~0 o m U C' N 0.~ 16 ~ .. ~ i N O > C. 10 > t., h O ~ `Q N ~ i'~`. aQ e o o W ,Q o o ~ o N S D S „a O U o N T >m. ~~ c. U N o o a ~ m n r ~- Q ~ a n a v L' q ~~ f m o N v _~ E '° U N ~.-. A V a a U a U m~ _ 10 o V ° _ `~ ~ N U N U U H m o ~ 7 ~ .al~ ~ Z p O m O ~ m Z - to N n T N O o m N iA > O O N Z :'. ~ II" O C ~ m > N 9 ITO T V n~ O tl! EI! O N U n ~ > O ~ O N ~ > n O O M M ~ - M N M /A ~ H b O U U U U o~ ~ Q U o - - ypy Vf Z N 69 ti ~ C - ~" O .. O ~~ t0 Q m m m N N N Q m H M £ m C m $ m ~ m m T m m m m N m '~ O N H O • ppp 0 c m Z m ~ - r m U m m a w m m ~ m> m> as as N » Z ~ y ~ '. ;e o o O Z o o O U e e ' ;e ~ v M ' N9 N N N N N N N N ~~ ~ t~: a 'm ' '~ E 7 1 ; J: E m S T ~ J J d ~ a ~ ~ C, Y a _ ~ o J ~ o ~ ~ r,. ~ :n. z m m _ ~ ~ a E po m m $ d m m ~ ° ~ Z ~ ~ ~ Ii U v ? x at: > o '` o C] N U X T d i c E c m ffi m c ~ m ~ m a m a m ~ v > m m _ o c Z m m m ~ m A m .~ g a ~ .- N ~ CI m (n Z .' c c m ; c a Y m ~ m m ~ E -o .~ a . ~, 14a 5 ~' a`I m m 'm o Q ¢ ~ _ _ ~ cn a C O ~ o m w .a a ~ ~_. 5 O i- ~ i- ~ z N X Q M d Comparison of Different Salary /Health Insurance Increases Method 1 c Employee Example Salary Increase Annual Salary Salary Increase Increase per pay period Increase per month Net Inc (Dec) 30, 000.00 900.00 3% 34.62 69.23 Health Insurance Increase ~Z~ Single 6°~a Single + One 3 ~ :Family Total Insurance Increase County/School portion Employees Method 1 d Net Inc (Dec) 30,000:00 1,200.00 4% 46.15 92.31 4.08 65.15 12.24 80.07 26.58 42.65 ~a`. 3t 79.74 12.57 46.95 22.28 ~ 8 '~ ~~ 140.85 (48.54) 1,618,011.00 544,011 502,224.00 1,576,224 2,120,235.00 2,120,235.0 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 14, 2000 RESOLUTION 031400-7 CERTIFYING THE CLOSED MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened a closed meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such closed meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the closed meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the closed meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor McNamara to adopt the Certification Resolution; and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~• Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Closed Session File ~ ROAN ~.~ ~ L - 1838 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE MARY H. ALLEN, CMC ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 BRENDA J. HOLTON CLERK TO THE BOARD (540) 772-2005 DEPUTY CLERK Intemet E-Mail: mallenQwww.co.roanoke.va.us FAX (540) 772-21 93 Internet E-Mail: bholtonQwww.co.roanoke.va.us March 15, 2000 Mr. David R. Smith 2119 Sorrel Lane, SW Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Mr. Smith: I am pleased to inform you that, at their meeting held on Tuesday, March 14, 2000, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to appoint you as a member of the Library Board, representing the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, for afour-year term. This term began on December 31, 1999, and will expire on December 31, 2003. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, or appointed to any public body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act. Your copy is enclosed. State law requires that you take an oath of office before the Clerk of the Roanoke County Circuit Court. This oath must be administered prior to your participation on this Board. Please telephone Steven A. McGraw, at 387-6205, to arrange to have this oath administered, and Mr. McGraw has asked that you bring this letter with you. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bjh Enclosures cc: Spencer Watts, Director, Libraries Steven A. McGraw, Clerk, Circuit Court ® Re~yded Paper SCHEDULED WORK SESSIONS February 8 - Review of Goals set in July 1999 (Elmer Hodge) - Tour of construction sites (requested by Supervisor Minnix) February 29 -Update on Economic Development Strategy (David Porter) -Amendments to the Zoning Ordinance -Cluster Housing (Terry Harrington) -Joint Work Session with School Board - CIP & Revenues (Brent Robertson) March 14 -Status Report on Non-standard refuse collection (Elaine Carver) - Water and sewer rate studies (Gary Robertson) - Consideration of charging for rescue calls (Rick Burch) March 28 -Joint Work Session with School Board -School Board Budget (Brent- ECH) - Budget Work Session -County Operating Budget (Brent-ECH April 11 -Budget Work Session -General discussion on remaining issues to resolve. (Brent-ECH) April 25 -Work Session on proposed budget (Elmer Hodge) Memo To: Mary Allen Frorr~ Brent Robertson Date: 01 /20/2000 Re: Tentative Budget Worksessions - FY2000-2001 Tentative Budget Worksession schedule for FY2000-2001 budget development is as follows: January Mid-year Revenue and Expenditure Report FY00-01 Revenue Overview February CIP Review (Can be deferred until March) Public Hearings: Tax Rates, Assessments, and General Comment March Contributions -Social Svc., Cultural, and Tourism Organizations Expenditures: Salaries, Insurance, Depatmental needs Joint Worksession with School Board April Volunteer Fire and Rescue Chiefs Woricsession on Proposed Budget and Adoption of School Budget 1 ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA MARCH 14, 2000 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m. on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. The meetings are broadcast live on RVTV, Channel 3, and will be rebroadcast on Thursdays at 7 P.M. and Saturdays at 4 p•m. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement in order to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings or other programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County, please contact the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772-2005. We request that you provide at least 48-hours notice so that proper arrangements may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call 2. Invocation: 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS D. BRIEFINGS 1. Report on March Through Time Celebration at Tanglewood Mall on March 24 - 26, 2000. (Mary Allen, Clerk to the Board) 1 2. Presentation of the Annual Report from the Roanoke Valley Economic Development Partnership. (Phil Sparks, Executive Director) E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request to establish the tax rates in Roanoke County for calendar year 2000 a. Order setting the tax rate on real estate for the calendar year 2000 at the curren rate of $1.13 per one hundred dollars of assessed valuation. (Brent Robertson, Budget Director) b. Order setting the tax levy on all classes of personal property at the current rate of $3.50 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation, and machinery and tools for the calendar year 2000 at the current rate of $3.00 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation. (Brent Robertson, Budget Director) ~• F. FIRST READINGS OF ORDINANCES 1. First Reading of an ordinance to vacate a 30' by 120' prescriptive right of way, generally located 250' from the intersection of Mountain View Road and Laurel Glen Road in the Vinton Magisterial District upon the petition of Wolf Creek Inc. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) 2. First Reading of an ordinance to vacate a 10' private greenway easement located between lots 3 and 4 in Section 3 of the Lillies of the Garden, located in the Cave Spring Magisterial District upon the petition of Strauss Construction Corporation. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) 3. First reading of ordinance to vacate an 81 square foot section of Fairway View Trail in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District upon the petition of George Baron. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) 4. Firs reading ordina authori 'ng newal lease of real estate for a publ' s f radi to r site on inke Mountain. (Paul Maho ,County Attorney) G. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 2 1. Second reading of ordinance authorizing Appalachian Power Company to expand the use of an existing easement across a well lot on Oriole Lane (Tax Map # 87.17-3-13) owned by the Board of Supervisors. (Paul M Mahoney, County Attorney) H. PUBLIC HEARINGS I. APPOINTMENTS 1. Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals 2. Highway and Transportation Safety Commission 3. League of Older Americans -Advisory Council 4. League of Older Americans -Advisory Board 5. Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission J. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Approval of minutes -December 7, 1999 2. Confirmation of committee appointment to the Library Board. 3. Request from Police Department to accept $500 donation from the Loyal Order of Moose Lodge 284 for the DARE program. 4. Approval of resolutions of appreciation upon the retirements of: a. Beverly Tys-Berson, Youth Haven II b. Donald R. Carroll, Utility Department 5. Request from Libraries to accept $2,105 in donations and grants and 3 appropriate to the Library budget. 6. Request from Social Services Department to accept and appropriate $257,000 for Child Day Care Block Grant. K. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS 1. Request to schedule a budget work session. L. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS M. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS N. REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Future School Capital Reserve 5. Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investments and Portfolio Policy as of February 29, 2000. O. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS P. WORK SESSIONS (4TH FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM) 1. Results of water and sewer rate studies and possible changes in rates for customers. (Gary Robertson, Utility Director) 2. Report on 1999 Economic Development efforts and discussion of work plan for 2000. (David Porter, Economic Development Director) 3. Discussion of Fire and Rescue response and reaction times. (Rick 4 Burch, Fire and Rescue Chief) 4. Consideration of a method to fund improvements to Fire and Rescue response times, Fire and Rescue buildings and purchases of equipment by the use of fees for Emergency Medical Services. (Rick Burch, Fire and Rescue Chief) 5. Discussion on cluster housing amendments to the Zoning Ordinance. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) 6. Review of County Administration Goals established in July 1999 (Continued from February 8, 2000) Q. CLOSED MEETING pursuant to Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (5) discussion of a prospective business or industry where no previous announcement has been made. R. CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION S. ADJOURNMENT 5 ~~ ~~ Daa~t - 3/8/00 - 3.•~,1i. yrs. ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA MARCH 14, 2000 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m. on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. The meetings are broadcast live on RVTV, Channel 3, and will be rebroadcast on Thursdays at 7 P.M. and Saturdays at 4 t~ Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement in order to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings or other programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County, please contact the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772-2005. We request that you provide at least 48-hours notice so that proper arrangements may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call 2. Invocation: 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS D. BRIEFINGS 1. Report on March Through Time Celebration at Tanglewood Mall on March 24 - 26, 2000. (Mary Allen, Clerk to the Board) ~~ E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request from Social Services Department to accept and appropriate ~ $257,000 for Child Day Care Block Grant. (Betty McCrary, Social Services Director) 2. Request to establish the tax rates in oanoke County for calendar year 2000. G`'~h ~' ~ ~~ ~'.~-1~~-~- --- ----~--z a. Order setting the tax rate real estate for the calendar year 2000. (Brent Robertson, Budget Director) a¢ ' .' b. Order setting the tax ley on all classes of personal property and machinery and tools for the calendar year 2000. (Brent Robertson, Budget Director) ~~ 3°• ~~,-i~ 9.5_--- F. FIRST READINGS OF ORDINANCES 1. First Reading of an ordinance to vacate a 30' by 120' prescriptive right of way, generally located 250' from the intersection of Mountain View Road and Laurel Glen Road in the Vinton Magisterial District upon the petition of Wolf Creek Inc. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) 2. First Reading of an ordinance to vacate a 10' private greenway easement located between lots 3 and 4 in Section 3 of the Lillies of the Garden, located in the Cave Spring Magisterial District upon the petition of Strauss Construction Corporation. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) 3. First reading of ordinance to vacate an 81 square foot section of Fairway View Trail in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District upon the petition of George Baron. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) G. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Second reading of ordinance authorizing Appalachian Power Company to expand the use of an existing easement across a well lot on Oriole Lane (Tax Map # 87.17-3-13) owned by the Board of ~-uperviso~saul M Mahoney, County Attorney) H. S ``~~ ~ / ~ 2 ~. APPOINTMENTS 1. Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals 2. Highway and Transportation Safety Commission 3. League of Older Americans -Advisory Council 4. League of Older Americans -Advisory Board 5. Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Approval of minutes -December 7, 1999 2. Confirmation of committee appointment to the Library Board. 3. Request from Police Department to accept $500 donation from the Loyal Order of Moose Lodge 284 for the DARE program. 4. Approval of resolutions of appreciation upon the retirements of: a. Beverly Tys-Berson, Youth Haven II b. Donald R. Carroll, Utility Department 5. Request from Libraries to accept $2,105 in donations and grants and appropriate to the Library budget. 3 K. REQU STS FOR WORK SESSIONS ~- ~r/ .~ ~ ~~ L. RE ESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS M. N. O. P. h ~~ CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Future School Capital Reserve 5. Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investments and Portfolio Policy as of February 29, 2000. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS WORKS SSI NS (4TH FLOOR CONFERENCE R 1f'~ Resu is water and sewer rate studies (Ga Robertson Utility Director) ~~, ,G~ ~ ~. ~ ~.'~ on Economic Development Strategy (David Porter, Economic Development Director) !~ ~~ ` ~~- Consideration of for MS (Rick Burch, Fire and Rescue Chief) ~~ Discussion on~esponse and Reaction times. (Rick Burch, Fire and Rescue Chief) 5. S~Discussion on cluster housing amendments to the Zoning Ordinance. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) 6. ,~ Review of County Administration Goals established in July 1999 (Continued from February 8, 2000) 4 Q. CLOSED MEETING pursuant to Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A R. CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION S. ADJOURNMENT Dza~t - 3/6/00 - 3:00 ~i. ~. ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA MARCH 14, 2000 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m. on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. The meetings are broadcast live on RVTV, Channel 3, and will be rebroadcast on Thursdays at 7 P.M. and Saturdays at 4 p.m. Individuals with disabilities who require assistance or special arrangement in order to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings or other programs and activities sponsored by Roanoke County, please contact the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772-2005. We request that you provide at least 48-hours notice so that proper arrangements may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call 2. Invocation: 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCLAMAT NS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS ~ -a g' 1. Certificate of Re gnition o B ry C d, Department of Forestry, for his work with R Hoke ount i e 19 7. .3• d~~~ 1 D. BRIEFINGS 1. Report on March Through Time Celebration at Tanglewood Mall on March 24 - 26, 2000. (Mary Allen, Clerk to the Board) E. NEW BUSINESS F. FIRST READINGS OF ORDINANCES 1. First Reading of an ordinance to vacate a 30' by 120' prescriptive right of way, generally located 250' from the intersection of Mountain View Road and Laurel Glen Road in the Vinton Magisterial District upon the petition of Wolf Creek Inc. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) 2. First Reading of an ordinance to vacate a 10' private greenway easement located between lots 3 and 4 in Section 3 of the Lillies of the Garden, located in the Cave Spring Magisterial District upon the petition of Strauss Construction Corporation. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) 3. First reading of ordinance to vacate an 81 square foot section of Fairway View Trail in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District upon the petition of George Baron. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) E-`~ G. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Second reading of ordinance authorizing Appalachian Power Company to expand the use of an existing easement across a well lot on Oriole Lane (Tax Map # 87.17-3-13) owned by the Board of Supervisors. (Paul M Mahoney, County Attorney) 2 H. PUBLIC HEARINGS I. APPOINTMENTS 1. Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals 2. Highway and Transportation Safety Commission 3. League of Older Americans -Advisory Council 4. League of Older Americans -Advisory Board 4. Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission J. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Approval of minutes -December 7, 1999 2. Confirmation of committee appointment to the Library Board. 3. Request from Police Department to accept $500 donation from the Loyal Order of Moose Lodge 284 for the DARE program. m.~~e- 4. Request from Social Services Department to accept and appropriate N t3 $257,000 for Child Day Care Block Grant. Q ~ 5. Request from Libraries to accept donations and grants and tJ appropriate to the Library budget. 3 K. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS L. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS M. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS N. REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Future School Capital Reserve 5. Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investments and Portfolio Policy as of February 29, 2000. O. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS ..~..--e.~0 P. WORK SESSIONS (4TH FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM) ~ Update on Economic Development Strategy (David Porter, Economic Development Director) ~ ~ Results of water and sewer rate studies (Gary Robertson, Utility Director) 3. Consideration of charging fees for EMS Services. (Rick Burch, Fire and Rescue Chief) 4. Discussion on Response and Reaction times. (Rick Burch, Fire and Rescue Chief) ~1.~ ~ Review of County Administration Goals established in July 1999 ontinued from February 8, 2000) 5 ~~ ~-~ , Q. CLOSED MEETING pursuant to Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A R. CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION S. ADJOURNMENT AGENDA CHECKLIST MEETING DATE: MONDAY -WEEK BEFORE MEETING E- mail department heads about agenda staff meeting and ask for titles Prepare draft agenda for 3 p.m. staff meeting Prepare routine Board reports TUESDAY -WEEK BEFORE MEETING ~ ~ Make changes to agenda and a-mail agenda draft to dept. heads ~ ~ ~ Prepare Recognition resolutions and proclamations ~ Prepare Board Reports for Elmer's signature WEDNESDAY -WEEK BEFORE MEETING Contact minister Contact anyone making presentations and confirm their attendance Decide on dinner menu and order -type up memo on dinner Give completed and reviewed Board Reports to ECH Send reminder to dept. heads to send in reports Check for 1st and 2 second reading with PMM and dept. heads THURSDAY -WEEK BEFORE MEETING Complete and proof any resolutions, proclamations, certificates to be handed out Review Board Reports and attachments Finalize agenda Check on Executive Session, and any other non-routine items FRIDAY -WEEK BEFORE MEETING Proof agenda and finalize Check vote info and date on all reports, reso and ord Compare agenda to agenda items Complete consent resolution Number, count item pages and run one original and 14 3-hole copies Check ECH and others for any additional memos or information to include Make sure all additional information, minutes or documents are with packet Gather all correspondence for Board members e-mail agendas to department heads and citizens. Regular mail others by 4 p.m. Make sure all agenda items are signed and approved by ECH Double check that correct mail and correct agenda packet in mailing folder ~ 4 MONDAY -BEFORE BOARD MEETING , ~' Prepare action agenda Prepare vote sheet Check on Executive Session Items Check on additional people for dinner Remind minister Check on any audio-visuals for any presentations Prepare any large print resos or proclamations TUESDAY -BOARD MEETING ~ Prepare Board Reading File V ~ Prepare tapes Run additional copies of agenda for meeting Check on supplies, ice and drinks for dinner or snacks Take packet, media packet, tapes, certificates, etc. down to meeting room Gather Proclamations, certificates, resolutions to be signed by BOS Prepare 4th floor training room for work session ~'C Frame proclamations or resolutions Final check on executive session items, dinner, etc. WFr11UFSr10Y TNI IRSr)~Y _ pFTFR RnL1Rl~ MFFTWC~ Complete action agenda e-mail action agenda to department heads and add to G:\Common add new items to upcoming agenda packets Contact staff to place resolutions, ordinances on G:\Common Prepare Board Reports, resolutions and ordinances for signing and distribution Write appropriate letters to go with resolutions Prepare certificates for old committee members and prepare letters to new members Update Committee Book From: "Terry Harrington" <ADM01/TLH> To: adm01/mha, adm01/bjh Date sent: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 09:37:10 -0500 Subject: change to title of Agenda Item. Copies to: adm01/vlh Mary/Brenda... Please change the Wolf Creek Agenda item to the following title: Authorization to give notice to the Commonwealth Transportation Board to proceed with the abandonment of a 30' x 118' prescriptive right-of-way, generally located 250' from the intersection of Mountain View Road and Laurel Glen Road in the Vinton Magisterial District. Report will be up to you tout suite! Brenda Holton -- 1 -- Fri, 10 Mar 2000 09:37:44 From: "Brenda Holton" <ADM01/BJH> To: adm01/mha Date sent: Thu, 9 Mar 2000 10:29:33 -0500 Subject: Annual Partnership Report Eula Rosenberger, 343-1550, called to ask if Phil Sparks presenting the Annual Partnership Report could be on the 3/14 agenda. He has that time free and report takes 10 - 15 minutes. Told her we were working on agenda for the 3/14 and might be that meeting or the 3/28. Please call her. Brenda Holton CMC Deputy Clerk 772-2005 Mary Allen -- 1 -- Fri, 10 Mar 2000 07:39:43 -- Q ~W~ ~_ ~W~ ~O ~ ~ V V ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~ .a .i3 ~' "~6 ~--~ N ~N ~~ v N O~ ~O V N/ ~~ ~~ v ~~ W tip' i ~ I ,~,os ~' ~= ~ o l r 8~ s ~ / / A 1~ ~y~P I ~ / r-- l n ~ ~ ~ • os ~ P Q ~ -~ / 0~ pF ~~ ~°l ~~ `" I V I •~8~-.. I I 1 ~~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~o .l8~ ' y Q ~Q ~ O ~j V OV ~ o~ ~Z Z ~O vW~ v Q ~' 0 om~ ~o ~~O ~W ~~~ mz W~u ~~ SSA j~ Q~~ ~~ ~~~ ~ Q~~ ~ ~~Z~W= ~~~~~~ ~~ZW~W oW W ~ ~~ w~o~~W Qa~JQ~ ~ u ~ ~~~~~~ weq~~~ ~N Memo To: Mary Allen From Brent Robertson Date: 01 /20/2000 Re: Tentative Budget Worksessions - FY2000-2001 Tentative Budget Worksession schedule for FY2000-2001 budget development is as follows: January Mid-year Revenue and Expenditure Report FY00-01 Revenue Overview February CIP Review (Can be deferred until March) Public Hearings: Tax Rates, Assessments, and General Comment March Contributions -Social Svc., Cultural, and Tourism Organizations Expenditures: Salaries, Insurance, Depatmental needs Joint Worksession with School Board April Volunteer Fire and Rescue Chiefs Worksession on Proposed Budget and Adoption of School Budget 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 14, 2000 AGENDA ITEM: Request to accept $500 donation from the Loyal Order of Moose Lodge for the Police Department D.A.R.E. Program COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: On February 20, 2000, the Police Department received a donation of $500 from the Loyal Order of Moose Lodge #284. This money was designated by that organization to be used in the agency's D.A.R.E. Program STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the $500 donation be accepted for the D.A.R.E. Program. Respectfully Submitted by: ~~;'G~ C~~~~ J. R. Lavinder Chief of Police Approved by: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE No. Yes Abs Approved () Motion by: Church _ _ Denied () Johnson _ _ _ Received () McNamara_ _ _ Referred () Minnix _ _ _ To () Nickens 1 ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER. MEETING DATE: February 29, 2000 ~ENDA, ITEM COUNTY ~DMINISTRATOR'~COMMEN~: BACKGROUND: SUMMARY OF INFORMA'~ION: February 20, 2000, the Police Department received a donation of $500.00 from the Loyal Order of Moose Lodge #284. This money was designated by that organization for use in the agency's D.A.R.E. program. FI~~AL IMPACT: None ALTERNAT VES: ALTER~.ATIZTES AND FISC,~ IM~'ACT: STAFF RECOMMEV~D7~'ION: The staff recommends that the donation be accepted To: "Susie Owen" <ADM01/SBO> Subject: Re: 3 pm meeting Date sent: Thu, 2 Mar 2000 15:01:19 That's O.K. well just go ahead without him -we've done it before. From: "Susie Owen" <ADM01/SBO> To: adm01/bjh, adm01/mha Date sent: Thu, 2 Mar 2000 14:58:10 -0500 Subject: 3 pm meeting > Elmer & Diane H. have a meeting with Joe M. here on Monday (Joe set > this up with ECH) at 3 pm same time as your agenda team meeting. > Susie B. Owen, CPS > County Administrator's Office > 772.2004 Mary Allen -- 1 -- Thu, 2 Mar 2000 15:01:20 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Future School Capital Reserve 5. Accounts Paid -January 2000 6. Proclamation signed by the Chairman 7. Changes to the VDOT Secondary System in January 2000 8. Notice of VDOT Salem District Preallocation Public Hearing 9. Report on proposed Sanderson Subdivision in Hollins Magisterial District N. WORK SESSIONS (4TH FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM) 1. Update on Economic Development Strategy. (David Porter, Economic Development Director) POSTPONED TO 3/14!00 2. Discussion on amendments to the zoning ordinance concerning cluster subdivisions. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) 3. Budget Work Session a. Review of debt schedules (Diane Hyatt) b. Discussion on revenues (Brent Robertson) 6 ADMINISTRATOR TO RESOLVE THESE ISSUES. HELD FROM 6:45 - 7:00 P.M. To: ADMRCS/BCHASTAIN Subject: Re: Work Session Date sent: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 07:41:30 Thanks for checking. I've forwarded your message to Mr. Hodge so I'll let you know what he says but it sounds like March 14 is not a good time. After I hear back from him, I'll a-mail you again. From: ADMRCS/BCHASTAIN To: adm01/mha Date sent: 28 Feb 2000 16:45:39 +0000 Subject: Work Session > Jerry Canada and Bill Irvin will be out of town on March 14 and will > not be able to attend the budget work session. So far, Tom Leggette > is the only person that is available. I have not heard from Marion > Roark or Mike Stovall. > Please let me know if another date will be better. Bill Irvin > suggested March 9 when the school board has a scheduled budget work > session prior to its regular meeting. Mary Allen -- 1 -- Tue, 29 Feb 2000 07:41:31 Mon, To: adm01/ech Copies to: adm01/ddh, adm01/wbr Subject: Work Session with School Board Date sent: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 14:26:36 I called Brenda Chastain and asked he to contact Dr. Weber and the School Board to see if they are available for a Joint work session on March 14 (sometime after 4 p.m.). I'll let you know what she says. Mary Allen -- 1 -- Wed, 23 Feb 2000 14:26:36