The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About11/14/2000 - Regular~ FiOANp,S.~ ~ ~ 2 a 1838 C~a~x~#~ ~~ ~Z.~~x~~~e ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA NOVEMBER 14, 2000 ,~~~~,~ Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m. on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. The meetings are broadcast live on RVTV, Channel 3, will be rebroadcast on Thursdays at 7 P.M. and Saturdays at 4 p.m., and are now closed captioned. BECAUSE OF THE THANKSGIVING AND CHRISTMAS HOLIDAYS. THE ONLY MEETING IN NOVEMBER WILL BE NOVEMBER 14 AT 3:00 P.M. AND 7:00 P.M. THE DECEMBER MEETINGS WILL BE HELD ON DECEMBER 5 AT 3:00 P.M. AND DECEMBER 19 AT 3:00 P.M. AND 7:00 P.M. Individuals who require assistance or special arrangements to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings should contact the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772-2005 at least 48 hours in advance so reasonable accommodations may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call 2. Invocation: The Reverend Steve Taylor Ghent Grace Brethren Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS 1 ® Recycled Paper C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Proclamation declaring the week of November 12 - 18, 2000 as American Education Week. 2. Certificate of Honorary Citizenship to Master Carver, Rudolph Kostner, from Groden, Italy who will hold a special carving in Roanoke County on November 17, 2000. D. BRIEFINGS E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request to approve a resolution adopting a Legislative Program for the 2001 General Assembly session. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 2. Request to approve a construction contract and advance funds for the renovations at Glenvar Middle School. (Dr. Linda Weber, School Superintendent and Diane Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer) F. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA: Approval of these items does not indicate support for, or judge the merits of, the requested zoning actions but satisfies procedural requirements and schedules the Public Hearings which will be held after recommendation by the Planning Commission. 1. First reading of ordinance of petition of First Team Auto Mall to obtain a Special Use Permit for Automobile Repair, Major, located at the northeastern corner of Peters Creek and Barrens Road, Hollins Magisterial District. 2. First reading of ordinance petition of Tim T. Snyder to rezone property in the 5200 block of Peters Creek Road from C-2 conditional, General Commercial to C-2, General Commercial, Hollins Magisterial District. 3. First reading of ordinance of petition of the Roanoke County Planning Commission to amend the 1998 Roanoke County Community Plan by adopting design policies and standards for the 2 Clearbrook Community and to amend the Official Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County by rezoning certain parcels in the Clearbrook Community from AV Agricultural Village and AR Agricultural Residential to C-2 Commercial and further amending said zoning map and text by the addition of the Clearbrook Village Design Overlay District. 4. First reading of ordinance of petition of Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to rezone specific parcels of property to commercial and industrial designations and to adopt specific design guidelines for commercial and industrial uses in the vicinity of the Dixie Caverns 1- 81 Interchange, Exit 132. G. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. First reading of ordinance to establish a utility service area in Clearbrook for water and sewer extensions. (Gary Robertson, Utility Director) H. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES I. APPOINTMENTS 1. Blue Ridge Alliance for Organ and Tissue Donation 2. Blue Ridge Community Services Board of Directors 3. Grievance Panel 4. Highway and Transportation Safety Commission 5. Planning Commission 6. Social Services Advisory Board J. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE 3 REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Approval of Minutes -September 12, 2000 (Regular Meeting), September 26, 2000 (Regular Meeting and Joint Meeting with the Vinton Town Council), October 10, 2000 (Joint Meeting with Roanoke City Council), October 10, 2000 (Regular Meeting), and October 10, 2000 (Joint Meeting with Montgomery County Board of Supervisors) 2. Confirmation of committee appointment to the Industrial Development Authority. 3. Resolutions of Appreciation upon the retirement of a. Ricky L. Etter, Sheriff's Office b. Martha A. Gladden, Social Services Department c. Jeffrey M. Swortzel, Police Department d. Roger F. Robinson, Police Department e. Edward A. Shotwell, Police Department f. Linda S. Hogan; Police Department 4. Acceptance by the Police Department of the Bureau of Justice Assistance $31,454 block grant for law enforcement support. 5. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving The Gardens of Cotton Hill, Section 5 (Phase I). 6. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving Hickory Hill, Section 2. 7. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving A Cleaner World. 8. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving Whitney Estates Section 1 and 2. 9. Donation of 0.12 acre of land for public right-of-way from Residential Contractors, Inc. conveyed to the Board of Supervisors in the Hollins Magisterial District. 10. Request for acceptance of Blue Bird Lane into the VDOT secondary highway system and to improve the road to State standards. 4 11. Appropriation of funds for the interest expense on the Valley Gateway shell building through June 30, 2001. 12. Request for approval of issuance of $3,000,000 revenue bonds by the Industrial Development Authority for the benefit of Certified Medical Representatives Institute, Inc. 13. Acceptance of Overlook Trail into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 14. Request to abolish the Roanoke County Highway Transportation and Safety Commission to focus efforts on the Blue Ridge Transportation Safety Board. 15. Request from Sheriff's Office to accept the $15,074 Adult Literacy and Basic Education Program Grant. 16 Request for resolution of support for Virginia Land Conservation Foundation grant application for protection of Read Mountain. K. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS L. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS M. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS N. REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Future School Capital Reserve 5. Proclamation signed by the Chairman 6. Update on Emergency Medical Dispatchers since implementation of 911 increase 5 7. Statement of Treasurer's Accountability per investment and portfolio policy as of October 31, 2000. O. WORK SESSIONS 1. Work Session with Schools to discuss the School Administration Six Year Improvement Plan. 2. Work Session to review the VDOT Secondary System Six-Year Construction Plan and revenue sharing projects. 3. Budget Work Sessions to review: (a) Results of operations for the County for the year ended June 30, 2000 (Diane Hyatt) (b) List of Potential Needs (Elmer Hodge) (c) Rollover requests from County departments (Brent Robertson) (d) Review of first quarter revenues for 2001-2002 (Brent Robertson P. CLOSED MEETING pursuant to Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344A (7) consultation with counsel and briefings by staff concerning litigation with Rising Star Sports Camp; 2.1-344A (7) consultation with legal counsel, specifically legal matter; Keeling Tire Dump; 2.1-344A (3) acquisition of real property for public purposes. EVENING SESSION (7:00 P.M.) Q. CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION R. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Resolution of Congratulations to Alan May for being named to the All State Golf Team. 2. Resolution of Congratulations to the staff and advisors of William Byrd High School "Sketches" for being named Most Outstanding High School Literary-Art Magazine for 2000. S. NEW BUSINESS 6 1. Request for appropriation as a result of operations for the year ended June 30, 2000. (Diane Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer) T. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Public Hearing for citizen comment on the petition of DePaul Family Services, Inc. to adopt a resolution supporting its request to the Virginia General Assembly to exempt from taxation certain property owned by DePaul in the County of Roanoke. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) U. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. WITHDRAWN AT THE REQUEST OF_THE PETITIONER) Second reading of ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit to construct a 180 foot broadcasting tower, located in the 300 block of John Richardson Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of U. S. Cellular. 2. Second reading of ordinance to amend and re-enact Sections 30-82- 12 and 30-82-13 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance to make minor revisions to use and design standards for certain single family residential developments, upon the petition of the Roanoke County Planning Commission. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) 3. Second reading of ordinance to obtain two Special Use Permits to operate a camp and a day care center located at 5488 Yellow Mountain Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of the C&H Enterprises and Rising Star Sports & Adventure Camp. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) 4. Second reading of ordinance amending Ordinance 011299-6, "Roanoke County Community Plan" for adoption of a new future land use map and design guidelines for the Colonial Avenue corridor. (Tim Beard, Planner) 5. Second reading of ordinance vacating a 15 foot drainage easement recorded in Plat Book 15, Page 131, within the boundary of Derby Drive in Triple Crown Estates, Section 1 and located in the Vinton Magisterial District. (Arnold Covey, Community Development Director) 7 6. Second reading of ordinance authorizing the vacation of a portion of a 20 foot water line easement and a portion of a 20 foot sanitary sewer easement and acceptance of the relocated portions across Parcel 1 B-1-A of Peters Creek Commercial Park. (Arnold Covey, Community Development Director) V. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS W. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS X. ADJOURNMENT PLEASE NOTE- There will be a meeting of the Roanoke County Audit Committee on November 17 at 8:30 a.m. at the Roanoke County Administration Center 8 ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION AGENDA NOVEMBER 14, 2000 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m. on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. The meetings are broadcast live on RVTV, Channel 3, will be rebroadcast on Thursdays at 7 P M and Saturdays at 4 p m ,and are now closed captioned. BECAUSE OF THE THANKSGIVING AND CHRISTMAS HOLIDAYS. THE ONLY MEETING IN NOVEMBER WILL BE NOVEMBER 14 AT 3:00 P.M. AND 7:00 P.M. THE DECEMBER MEETINGS WILL BE HELD ON DECEMBER 5 AT 3.00 P M. AND DECEMBER 19 AT 3:00 P.M. AND 7:00 P.M. Individuals who require assistance or special arrangements to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings should contact the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772-2005 at least 48 hours in advance so reasonable accommodations may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call HOM ABSENT~ARRIVED AT 4:10_P.M.) 2. Invocation: The Reverend Steve Taylor Ghent Grace Brethren Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS 1 ECH ADDED WORK SESSION ON RISING STAR SPORTS CAMP (ITEM 0-4) PMM ADDED CLOSED MEETING ITEMS: 2.1-344A (3) DISPOSITION OF REAL ESTATE; 21-344A (7~ LEGAL CONSULTATION CONCERNING INSURANCE COVERAGE AND VOLUNTEERS IN THE COUNTY; BLJ ADDED CLOSED MEETING 2.1-344A (7) CONSULTATION WITH LEGAL COUNSEL -UPDATE ON WATER CONTRACT WITH BOTETOURT COUNTY. C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Proclamation declaring the week of November 12 - 18, 2000 as American Education Week. JBC MOTION TO ADOPT PROCLAMATION -URC WITH HOM ABSENT ACCEPTED BY MAGGIE ANGELL, ROANOKE COUNTY EDUCATION ASSOCIATION 2. Certificate of Honorary Citizenship to Master Carver, Rudolph Kostner, from Groden, Italy who will hold a special carving in Roanoke County on November 17, 2000. ACCEPTED BY DENISE DURHAM, OWNER OF BLACK FOREST GIFTS, WHO WILL PRESENT TO MR. KOSTNER. D. BRIEFINGS E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request to approve a resolution adopting a Legislative Program for the 2001 General Assembly session. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) R-111400-1 JPM MOTION TO ADOPT RESO URC WITH HOM ABSENT 2. Request to approve a construction contract and advance funds for the renovations at Glenvar Middle School. (Dr. Linda Weber, School Superintendent and Diane Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer) R-111400-2 JBC MOTION TO ADOPT RESO AS AMENDED 2 URC (VOTE TAKEN AFTER HOM ARRIVED) F. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS AND FIRST READING OF RE~ONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA: Approval of these items does not indicate support for, or judge the merits of, the requested zoning actions but satisfies procedural requirements and schedules the Public Hearings which will be held after recommendation by the Planning Commission. BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND AND PUBLIC HEARINGS -12/19/00 URC WITH HOM ABSENT 1. First reading of ordinance of petition of First Team Auto Mall to obtain a Special Use Permit for Automobile Repair, Major, located at the northeastern corner of Peters Creek and Barrens Road, Hollins Magisterial District. 2. First reading of ordinance petition of Tim T. Snyder to rezone property in the 5200 block of Peters Creek Road from C-2 conditional, General Commercial to C-2, General Commercial, Hollins Magisterial District. 3. First reading of ordinance of petition of the Roanoke County Planning Commission to amend the 1998 Roanoke County Community Plan by adopting design policies and standards for the Clearbrook Community and to amend the Official Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County by rezoning certain parcels in the Clearbrook Community from AV Agricultural Village and AR Agricultural Residential to C-2 Commercial and further amending said zoning map and text by the addition of the Clearbrook Village Design Overlay District. 4. First reading of ordinance of petition of Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to rezone specific parcels of property to commercial and industrial designations and to adopt specific design guidelines for commercial and industrial uses in the vicinity of the Dixie Caverns 1- 81 Interchange, Exit 132. G. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 3 1. First reading of ordinance to establish a utility service area in Clearbrook for water and sewer extensions. (Gary Robertson, Utility Director) JPM MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND READING -12/5/00 URC WITH HOM ABSENT H. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES NONE I. APPOINTMENTS 1. Blue Ridge Alliance for Organ and Tissue Donation 2. Blue Ridge Community Services Board of Directors 3. Grievance Pane JBC NOMINATED KING HARVEY, ALTERNATE, AND KAREN SWELL, ALTERNATE, TO THREE-YEAR TERMS EXPIRING OCTOBER 28, 2003. 4. Highway and Transportation Safety Commission 5. Planning Commission MHA TO CONTACT AL THOMASON TO SERVE ANOTHER TERM 6. Social Services Advisory Board J. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 4 R-111400-3 JPM MOTION TO ADOPT CONSENT RESO AFTER DISCUSSION OF ITEMS 10 AND 12 AND ITEM 11 PULLED TO DISCUSS AT WORK SESSION. URC 1. Approval of Minutes -September 12, 2000 (Regular Meeting), September 26, 2000 (Regular Meeting and Joint Meeting with the Vinton Town Council), October 10, 2000 (Joint Meeting with Roanoke City Council), October 10, 2000 (Regular Meeting), and October 10, 2000 (Joint Meeting with Montgomery County Board of Supervisors) 2. Confirmation of committee appointment to the Industrial Development Authority. R-111400-3.a 3. Resolutions of Appreciation upon the retirement of a. Ricky L. Etter, Sheriff's Office R-111400-3.b b. Martha A. Gladden, Social Services Department R-111400-3.c c. Jeffrey M. Swortzel, Police Department R-111400-3.d d. Roger F. Robinson, Police Department R-111400-3.e e. Edward A. Shotwell, Police Department R-111400-3.f f. Linda S. Hogan; Police Department R-111400-3.g 4. Acceptance by the Police Department of the Bureau of Justice Assistance $31,454 block grant for law enforcement support. A-111400-3.h 5. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving The Gardens of Cotton Hill, Section 5 (Phase I). A-111400-3.i 6. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving Hickory Hill, Section 2. 5 A-111400-3.i 7. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving A Cleaner World. A-111400-3.k 8. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving Whitney Estates Section 1 and 2. A-111400-3.1 9. Donation of 0.12 acre of land for public right-of-way from Residential Contractors, Inc. conveyed to the Board of Supervisors in the Hollins Magisterial District. A-111400-3.m 10. Request for acceptance of Blue Bird Lane into the VDOT secondary highway system and to improve the road to State standards. R-111400-3.n r~--tiny -, REMOVED FROM CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED AFTER WORK SESSIONS 12. Request for approval of issuance of $3,000,000 revenue bonds by the Industrial Development Authority for the benefit of Certified Medical Representatives Institute, Inc. R-111400-3.0 13. Acceptance of Overlook Trail into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. R-111400-3.p 14. Request to abolish the Roanoke County Highway Transportation and Safety Commission to focus efforts on the Blue Ridge Transportation Safety Board. A-111400-3.g 15. Request from Sheriff's Office to accept the $15,074 Adult Literacy and Basic Education Program Grant. A-111400-3.r 6 16 Request for resolution of support for Virginia Land Conservation Foundation grant application for protection of Read Mountain. R-111400-3.s K. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS NONE L. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS NONE M. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS 1 Mary Selander, 3718 Green Valley Drive, representing the Colonial Avenue Alliance woke in support of the design guidelines for the Colonial Avenue corridor to be considered in the evening session. 2 Atan Gleiner, 10185 Bottom Creek Road, spoke in opposition to the Western Corridor for construction of I-73 and asked for a resolution from the Board . PMM to draft a resolution for the 1215/00 Board meeting. N. REPORTS HOM MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE -UF~C 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Future School Capital Reserve 5. Proclamation signed by the Chairman 6. Update on Emergency Medical Dispatchers since implementation of 911 increase 7 7. Statement of Treasurer's Accountability per investment and portfolio policy as of October 31, 2000. O. WORK SESSIONS 1. Work Session with Schools to discuss the School Administration Six Year Improvement Plan. HELD FROM 4:45 TO 5:30 P.M. OVERVIEW BY LORRAINE LANGE WITH DISCUSSION ON VARIOUS ASPECTS OF THE SIX YEAR IMPROVEMENT PLAN. GENERAL CONSENSUS THAT ANY BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED, INCLUDING FACILITIES AND OPERATIONS BY THE NEXT BUDGET PROCESS. 2. Work Session to review the VDOT Secondary System Six-Year Construction Plan and revenue sharing projects. HELD FROM 5:35 TO 5:50 P.M. PRESENTED BY ARNOLD COVEY, GEORGE SIMPSON, JEFF ECHOES, VDOT. PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD 12/19/00 WORK SESSION ON R/S/NG STAR SPORTS CAMP HELD FROM 5:50 P.M. TO 6:10 P.M. MIKE WRAY REPRESENTING RESIDENTS ADVISED THAT THEY WILL REQUEST 6 ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS TO SPECIAL USE PERMIT CONCERNING USE BY ROANOKE STEAM 3. Budget Work Sessions to review: (a) Results of operations for the County for the year ended June 30, 2000 (Diane Hyatt) (b) List of Potential Needs (Elmer Hodge) (c) Rollover requests from County departments (Brent Robertson) (d) Review of first quarter revenues for 2001-2002 (Brent Robertson HELD FOLLOWING EVENING SESSION FROM 8:55 TO 10:05 P.M. P. CLOSED MEETING pursuant to Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344A (7) 8 consultation with counsel and briefings by staff concerning litigation with Rising Star Sports Camp; 2.1-344A (7) consultation with legal counsel, specifically legal matter; Keeling Tire Dump; 2.1-344A (3) acquisition of real property for public purposes; 2.1-344A (3) disposition of real estate; 2.1- 344A (7) consultation with legal counsel concerning insurance coverage and volunteers and water contract with Botetourt County. JPM MOTION TO GO INTO CLOSED MEETING FOLLOWING THE WORK SESSIONS AT 4:55 P.M. -URC CLOSED SESSION HELD FROM 6:10 P.M. TO 7:00 P.M. EVENING SESSION (7:00 P.M.) Q. CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION R-111400-4 JPM MOTION TO RETURN TO OPEN SESSION AT 7:06 P.M. AND ADOPT CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION -URC R. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Resolution of Congratulations to Alan May for being named to the All State Golf Team. R-111400-5 JBC MOTION TO ADOPT RESO URC ALAN MAY WAS PRESENT TO ACCEPT THE RESO 2. Resolution of Congratulations to the staff and advisors of William Byrd High School "Sketches" for being named Most Outstanding High School Literary-Art Magazine for 2000. R-111400-6 HCN MOTION TO ADOPT RESO URC STAFF/ADVISORS WERE PRESENT TO RECEIVE RESO S. NEW BUSINESS 9 1. Request for appropriation as a result of operations for the year ended June 30, 2000. (Diane Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer) CONTINUED UNTIL AFTER BUDGET WORK SESSION T. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Public Hearing for citizen comment on the petition of DePaul Family Services, Inc. to adopt a resolution supporting its request to the Virginia General Assembly to exempt from taxation certain property owned by DePaul in the County of Roanoke. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) BLJ MOTION TO DELAY ACTION UNTIL 12/5/00 -URC STAFF TO CHECK OUT OPERATION LOOK AT COMPENSATION OF EMPLOYEES AND PROVIDE SITE MAP. U. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. WITHDRAWN AT THE REQUEST OF THE PETITIONER) Second reading of ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit to construct a 180 foot broadcasting tower, located in the 300 block of John Richardson Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of U. S. Cellular. WITHDRAWN 2. Second reading of ordinance to amend and re-enact Sections 30-82- 12 and 30-82-13 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance to make minor revisions to use and design standards for certain single family residential developments, upon the petition of the Roanoke County Planning Commission. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) 0-111400-7 JPM MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC 3. Second reading of ordinance to obtain two Special Use Permits to operate a camp and a day care center located at 5488 Yellow Mountain Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of the C&H Enterprises and Rising Star Sports & Adventure Camp. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) 10 0-111400-8 HOM MOTION TO ADOPT ORD AMENDED WITH SIX ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS CONCERNING ROANOKE STEAM'S USE OF THE CAMP URC 5 CITIZENS SPOKE 4. Second reading of ordinance amending Ordinance 011299-6, "Roanoke County Community Plan" for adoption of a new future land use map and design guidelines for the Colonial Avenue corridor. (Tim Beard, Planner) 0-111400- 9 HOM MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC 1 CITIZEN SPOKE 5. Second reading of ordinance vacating a 15 foot drainage easement recorded in Plat Book 15, Page 131, within the boundary of Derby Drive in Triple Crown Estates, Section 1 and located in the Vinton Magisterial District. (Arnold Covey, Community Development Director) 0-111400-10 HCN MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC 6. Second reading of ordinance authorizing the vacation of a portion of a 20 foot water line easement and a portion of a 20 foot sanitary sewer easement and acceptance of the relocated portions across Parcel 1 B-1-A of Peters Creek Commercial Park. (Arnold Covey, Community Development Director) 0-111400-11 BLJ MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC V. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS NONE W. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS Supervisor Johnson: (1) Asked Pete Haislip about improvements to 11 Brookside Park Mr Haislip updated Board on the improvements. (2) Asked Mr Haislipto check on the poor condition of flaps at the Brambleton Center and possibly other County buildings. (3) Advised he was unimpressed with the new County signs at various County boundary lines and liked the old ones better. Supervisor Minnix• (1) Has received a number of calls from citizens who have requested an acceptable required time when trash receptacles are removed from the road after trash collections. (2) Advised he has received correspondence from people supporting the appropriation of matching funds for Greenway grants. Supervisor Church• ~1) Expressed appreciation with the funding of renovations to Glenvar Middle School and the recognition of golf champ Alan May from Glenvar High School Also announced that the Glenvar High School girls basketball team, the Glenvar High School football team, the Northside High School football team and the Northside High School girls basketball teams all had outstanding seasons. Supervisor Nickens• (1) Advised that in the future VACo and NACO dues will be assessed together resulting in reduced dues for Roanoke County (2) Announced that. the VACO Insurance Program will be purchasing a building in downtown Roanoke to locate permanently. 3 Thanked the Board members for their endorsement as a VACO regional director. Supervisor McNamara' (1) Announced that following the budget work sessions the Board will return to Open Session to take action on two items. (2) Advised that the County has a surplus because they used conservative revenue .projections, and that they will consider funding items with the surplus that are tied to investment return. BUDGET WORK SESSION Budget Work Sessions to review: (a) Results of operations for the County for the year ended June 30, 2000 (Diane Hyatt) (b) List of Potential Needs (Elmer Hodge) (c) Rollover requests from County departments (Brent Robertson) (d) Review of first quarter revenues for 2001-2002 (Brent Robertson 12 HELD FOLLOWING EVENING SESSION FROM 8:55 TO 10:05 P.M. DDH PRESENTED INFORMATION ON YEAR END OPERATIONS DISCUSSION ON ROLLOVER REQUESTS FROM DEPARTMENTS. CONSENSUS TO APPROVE ROLLOVER REQUESTS EXCEPT FOR UPGRADE OF VIDEO EQUIPMENT IN BOS MEETING ROOM AND FUNDING FOR PRECINCT WORKERS. DOLLARS TO REMAIN IN ROLLOVER BUT NOT FOR THESE USES. DISCUSSION ON FUNDING FOR ROANOKE RIVER GREENWAY FUNDING. NO CONSENSUS AND WORK SESSION SCHEDULED FOR 12119/00. RETURN TO OPEN SESSION AT 10:05 P.M. NEW BUSINESS 1. Appropriation of funds for the interest expense on the Valley Gateway shell building through June 30, 2001. R-111400-12 JPM MOTION TO APPROVE APPROPRIATION FROM THE PUBLIC - PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP ACCOUNT -URC 2. Request for appropriation as a result of operations for the year ended June 30, 2000. (Diane Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer) A-111400-13 JPM MOTION TO APPROVE APPROPRIATION URC X. ADJOURNMENT JPM ADJOURNED MEETING AT 10:10 P.M. PLEASE NOTE: There will be a meeting of the Roanoke County Audit Committee on November 17 at 8:30 a.m. at the Roanoke County Administration Center 13 b . ~ ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER ~""~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 14. 2000 SUBJECT: Proclamation declaring .the week of November 12 - 18, 2000 as American Education Week COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: American Education Week was designated in 1912 by the National Education Association as "an education week" observed in all communities annually for the purpose of informing the public of the accomplishments and needs of the public schools and to secure the cooperation and support of the public in meeting these needs." It is always observed the week prior to Thanksgiving and is scheduled this year for November 12 - 18, 2000. Dr. Weber, School Superintendent, and Maggie Angell, Vice President of the Roanoke County Education Association and teacher at Mountain View Elementary School, will be present to accept the proclamation. ~~~~ ~ ~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE No. Yes Abs Approved () Motion by: Church _ _ Denied () Johnson Received () McNamara- _ _ Referred () Minnix To () Nickens _ _ _ c- i AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2000 PROCLAMATION DECLARING NOVEMBER 12 -18, 2000 AS AMERICAN EDUCATION WEEK IN ROANOKE COUNTY WHEREAS, public schools are the backbone of our democracy, providing young people with the tools they need to maintain our nation's precious values of freedom, civility, and equality; and WHEREAS, by equipping young Americans with both practical skills and broader intellectual abilities, schools give them hope for, and access to, a productive future; and WHEREAS, education employees, be they custodians or teachers, bus drivers or librarians, work tirelessly to serve our children and communities with care and professionalism; and WHEREAS, Roanoke County Public Schools have a long and honorable history of providing an outstanding education at all levels, from elementary through high school; and WHEREAS, schools are community linchpins, bringing together adults and children, educators and volunteers, business leaders and elected officials in a common enterprise. NOW, THEREFORE, WE, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, do hereby proclaim November 12 -18, 2000, as the 79thannual observance of AMERICAN EDUCATION WEEK, in recognition of the Roanoke County School Board, the Public School System, its staff and employees, and commend them on their dedication to learning, teaching and caring for our children, the future of Roanoke County. ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 14, 2000 AGENDA ITEM: Certificate of Honorary Citizenship to Master Carver Rudolph Kostner from Groden Italy COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Master Carver Rudolph Kostner will be in Roanoke County on November 17, 2000. He will be visiting only five localities during his U. S. tour. He will be representing ANRI Art and will be carving a limited number of 5 piece block Nativity scenes at Black Forest Gifts at Promenade Park in Roanoke County. ANRI is a woodcarving company of masters started in 1912, and all pieces are carved entirely by hand without the assistance of any special tooling. ANRI has presented many of these pieces as gifts to the Pope. Accepting the Certificate of Honorary Citizenship at the Board meeting will be Denise Durham, the owner of Black Forest Gifts. The certificate will be presented to Mr. Kostner in person when he arrives in Roanoke County on November 17, 2000. Attached is a copy of the Nativity Scene carved by Mr. Kostner. ~;~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Motion by: No. Yes Abs Church _ _ Johnson McNamara Minnix _ _ Nickens Brenda Holton - rudy.jpg Page 1 { i ~~~ ~ ~~~~ CERTIFICATE OF HONORARY CITIZENSHIP BE lT HEREBY KNOWN THAT Kudoplii Kostner Master Carver from Groden, Italy has, on november 17, 200° ,been named an HONORARY CI TIZEN OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA and shall hold and en joy a place of high esteem in the minds and hearts of the Citizens of the County of Roanoke. Chairman, Board of Supervisors ATTEST Clerk to the Board of Supervisors County Administrator -- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2000 RESOLUTION 111400-1 ADOPTING A LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM FOR THE 2001 SESSION OF THE VIRGINIA GENERAL ASSEMBLY, AND PETITIONING THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY TO FAVORABLY CONSIDER THE TOPICS AND ISSUES ADDRESSED HEREIN WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, has identified major legislative issues of state-wide concern to be considered by the 2001 session of the Virginia General Assembly; and WHEREAS, the Board adopts this resolution as its Legislative Program forthe 2001 session of the Virginia General Assembly. NOW, THEREFORE, Be It Resolved by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the following legislative initiatives are submitted for its legislative program for the 2001 session of the Virginia General Assembly for its favorable consideration and adoption. A. Education. Realizing that public education is the foundation of American democracy and the cornerstone of our future economic well being, the County urges the General Assembly to consider favorably the following actions. 1) The Constitution of the Commonwealth of Virginia should be amended to provide that elected school boards may be granted the authority and responsibility for taxation to support public education. 2) The General Assembly should enhance funding for public education, including increasing the funds available to the Literary Fund for local school capital construction or renovation projects. The General Assembly should increase funding for capital construction and renovation projects based upon the locality's local effort in support of these capital projects. 3) Local school divisions should be authorized to establish opening dates for school. following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Minnix A COPY TESTE: ~. t~ Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Cc: File Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney The Honorable John S. Edwards The Honorable Malfourd W. "Bo" Trumbo The Honorable H. Morgan Griffith The Honorable Clifton "Chip" Woodrum The Honorable C. Richard Cranwell The Honorable A. Victor Thomas Mary F. Parker, Clerk, Roanoke City Council Roanoke City Council, Members Forest Jones, Salem City Manager Salem City Council, Members Carolyn S. Ross, Clerk, Vinton Town Council Vinton Town Council, Members Wayne Strickland, Executive Director, Fifth Planning District Commission James D. Campbell, Executive Director, Virginia Association of Counties 4 ACTION N0. ITEM N0. ~'"" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 14, 2000 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution Adopting a Legislative Program for the 2001 Session of the Virginia General Assembly, and Petitioning the General Assembly to Favorably Consider the Topics and Issues Addressed Herein COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Q SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This Resolution is based upon previous legislative programs adopted by the Board; however, it has been modified as follows: (i) adding provisions to address the recent problems with the location of the proposed gas pipeline by requiring written notice to affected property owners, and expanding the authority of the State Corporation Commission to require joint use of existing easements; (ii) supporting the distribution of state income tax collections to localities for their unrestricted use; and (iii) deletion of several public safety items and other items previously adopted by the General Assembly . Finally this office has scheduled a meeting with the local legislators at the Board's meeting scheduled for December 5, 2000 at 5:OOpm. FISCAL IMPACTS: None. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board consider the adoption of a legislative program for the 2001 session of the Virginia General Assembly for Roanoke County. 1 ~:` Respectfully submitted, ~~ 0 Vl •i rl Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Vote No Yes Abs Church Johnson McNamara Minnix Nickens G:\ATTORNEY\PMM\LEGIS\2001LEGIS.rpt.frm 2 .. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2000 RESOLUTION ADOPTING A LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM FOR THE 2001 SESSION OF THE VIRGINIA GENERAL ASSEMBLY, AND PETITIONING THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY TO FAVORABLY CONSIDER THE TOPICS AND ISSUES ADDRESSED HEREIN WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, has identified major legislative issues of state-wide concern to be considered by the 2001 session of the Virginia General Assembly; and WHEREAS, the Board adopts this resolution as its Legislative Program for the 2001 session of the Virginia General Assembly. NOW, THEREFORE, Be It Resolved by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the following legislative initia- tives are submitted for its legislative program for the 2001 session of the Virginia General Assembly for its favorable consideration and adoption. I. A. Education. Realizing that public education is the foundation of American democracy and the cornerstone of our future economic well being, the County urges the General Assembly to consider favorably the following actions. 1) The Constitution of the Commonwealth of Virginia should be amended to provide that elected school boards may be granted the authority and responsibility for taxation to support G:\ATTORNEY\PMM\LEGIS\2001LEGRES.wpd 1 ~ ,..~. public education. 2) The General Assembly should enhance funding for public education, including increasing the funds available to the Literary Fund for local school capital construction or renovation projects. The General Assembly should increase funding for capital construction and renovation projects based upon the locality's local effort in support of these capital projects. 3) Local school divisions should be authorized to establish opening dates for school. 4) Disparity funding should be based not only upon the number of students eligible for free or reduced fee lunches, but also upon the locality's local tax effort in support of education. Disparity funding should be based upon the composite index (which measures a locality's relative fiscal ability to provide its share of the cost of a local school system that meets the standards of quality) and the locality's local effort in support of that school system. B. Public Service Corporations. 1) Roanoke County supports legislation to provide citizens better notice of proposed construction of public service corporation facilities. "Interested parties" requiring written notice should include property owners directly affected by the proposed location of new facilities. 2) Roanoke County supports legislation to provide the G:\ATTORNEY\PMM\LEGIS\2001LEGRES.wpd 2 ."~ #~ State Corporation Commission with expanded authority to require joint use of existing easements for the installation of new facilities of public service corporations. Further the grant of all certificates of public convenience and necessity and the right to exercise the power of eminent domain to acquire any lands or estates or interests therein shall be conditioned upon the future joint use of existing easements or rights-of-way. C. Environment. 1) Roanoke County supports amending Chapter 6.1, "Virginia Tire Tax" of Title 58.1, "Taxation" (a) to increase the tire tax from $.50 to $1.25, and (b) to direct and authorize the Department of Waste Management to utilize the increased Waste Tire Trust Fund to remediate illegal or abandoned waste tire dumps. 2) Roanoke County supports allowing the disposal of land clearing vegetative debris (including tree stumps) in less expensive facilities in a manner not detrimental to the environment. D. Local Taxation and Fundinci. 1) County vigorously opposes any attempt to restrict or eliminate local sources of taxation, including personal property taxation and business and professional occupational licensing, unless local governments are guaranteed the opportunity to replace lost sources of local revenue with comparable, equivalent, independent sources of revenue to allow localities to fulfill their G:\ATTORNEY\PMM\LEGIS\2001LEGRES.wpd 3 ~~ public service obligations. 2) Roanoke County supports restructuring the distribution of tax revenues in the Commonwealth, by returning a portion of the state income tax collections to localities for their unrestricted use. 3) Roanoke County supports continued and increased funding for the Comprehensive Services Act, the Virginia Community Juvenile Crime Control Act, the Family Preservation Act, local police departments (HB 599 funding), and the Regional Competitiveness Act. 4) Roanoke County requests funding for the Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority (Explore Park), Blue Ridge Parkway Interpretive Center, and capital construction funding for the Explore Park Education Center. 5) Roanoke County supports authority to impose an additional one-half percent (~%) local option sales tax. 6) Roanoke County supports increased capital construction funding for regional juvenile detention facilities, and that such facilities receive at least 500 of their operating costs from the Commonwealth. 7) Roanoke County supports legislation amending Section 14.1-46.0:1 to increase the salary supplement for the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors from $1,800 to $2,500 per year. G:\ATTORNEY\PMM\LEGIS\2001LEGRES.wpd 4 - .1. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2000 RESOLUTION 111400-2 TO ADVANCE FUNDS FOR CERTAIN EXPENDITURES MADE AND/OR TO BE MADE IN CONNECTION WITH THE ACQUISITION, RENOVATION, CONSTRUCTION AND EQUIPPING OF CERTAIN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FOR SCHOOL PROJECTS WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "County Board") adopted a resolution on August 19, 1997 declaring its intention to reimburse itself from the proceeds of one or more tax-exempt financings for certain expenditures made and/or to be made in connection with the acquisition, renovation, construction and equipping of certain capital improvements for school projects, and WHEREAS, the School Board (the "School Board") of the County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "County") adopted a resolution on August 28, 1997 declaring its intention to reimburse itself from the proceeds of one or more tax-exempt financings for certain expenditures made and/or to be made in connection with the acquisition, renovation, construction and equipping of certain capital improvements for school projects, and WHEREAS, the School Board requested an advance to award contracts of $318,000 for site development, $129,300 for architecture and engineering costs, value engineering, and surveying/testing, and $226,651 for project management for Glenvar Middle School, for a total advance of $673,951, on June 13, 2000, and WHEREAS, the School Board requested an advance to award contracts of $592,100 for site development, $500,000 for road construction, and $757,992 for project management for the new south county high school, for a total advance of $1,850,092, on 1 June 13, 2000, and WHEREAS, the County Board approved an advance of $1,850,092 for the new south county high school and an advance of $673,951 for Glenvar Middle School on June 13, 2000, and WHEREAS, the School Board requested an advance of $9,500,000 to award the construction contract for the new south county high school for $19,094,000 on October 9, 2000, and WHEREAS, the County Board authorized the School Board to enter into a construction contractfor $19,094,000 and approved an advance of $9,500,OOOfor the new south county high school on October 10, 2000, and WHEREAS, the School Board nowdesire to award the construction contract for the renovations of Glenvar Middle School, and WHEREAS, the Schools Board requested as advance of $4,000,000 to award the construction contract for renovations at Glenvar Middle School for $6,125,000 on November 10, 2000, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the County Board approves the total budget for the Glenvar Middle School project of $7,819,767, authorizes the School Board to enter into a construction contract for $6,125,000, and advances the sum of $4,000,000, for renovations to Glenvar Middle School. On motion of Supervisor Church to adopt the resolution as amended, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara 2 NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Dr. Linda Weber, School Superintendent Brenda Chastain, Clerk, School Board ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER L' °~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 14, 2000 AGENDA ITEM: Request to Approve Construction Contract and Advance Funds for Renovation of Glenvar Middle School COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: .~~ ~~~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: On November 10, 2000, the School Construction Committee and the School Board reviewed construction bids for the renovations at Glenvar Middle School and awarded the construction contract to Branch & Associates for $6,125,000. The School Board would like to award the contract as soon as possible and begin construction in order to keep the project on schedule. At this time, the School Board would like to award the construction contract and begin the renovations. In additions, the School Board is requesting an advance of $4,000,000 for anticipated construction draws through May 2001. The School Board recently terminated their contract with Neilson Builders for $226,651 for project management. This project management line (less an expenses incurred to date) will be moved back into the construction line item. FISCAL IMPACT: This contract is within the constructions budget for Glenvar Middle and maintains the overall budget of $8,499,934, as shown on Attachment A. Proceeds from the state literary loan program and the Virginia Public School Authority will be used to finance this project. A literary loan application has been submitted to the Department of Education and we anticipate participating in the Spring 2001 VPSA bond issue. The School Board is requesting an advance of $4,000,000 at this time for construction draws needed between now and May 2001, when the VPSA bonds will be issued. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approving the attached resolution which requests an advance of $4,000,000 from the County for renovations at Glenvar Middle School and the approval of the construction contract of $6,125,000. M:\F'INANCE\COMMON\Board-Reports\2000U 1-14-0Oe.wpd ~~ SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: Diane D. Hyatt Elmer C. Hodge Chief Financial Officer County Administrator Approved () Motion by Denied O Church Received () Johnson Referred () McNamara To () Minnix Nickens No Yes Abs M:\FINANCE\COMMON\Board-Reports\2000\l l -14-0Oe.wpd d M~ W V ~ 0 to a d ~ '~ ~ ~ a L d V U c c ~ 03 m N O O ~ O N ' U ~ C ~ t0 ' > ~ Q C N ~ ~ ~ O O C ~ > CO Q ~ CAI O O U o ~ N y Q Q' ? ~ ° ° ° ~ ° c~ o o ~ p ~ ~ ~ ~ p p O 0 O O ~ M N N O O 0 0 CA ~ r M ~ ~ O O p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O O O O ~ ~- c~ d' r- O ~ ti O O p CA r r ~ N O O ~ O O O(07 COO O ~ N N ~ ~ N M O O O O O O tNA ~ r Cn N O O O O O O O M CO O O O 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 1 000610~~ OOOOCO OOMO(OO~t~- ' 000~~ N O S CO O CO f~ f~ O O O O N N ~ N ~ T M ~ M~~ (fl CO M O N O O M X 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 t; X 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' O M O ~ ' t p 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N ~ ~ M ~~ N N M N M '` ~ ~a ° ° ° ° O 0 o o o oo o~ ' O~~ rt00~0~ ~ U O)N~ N~ 7 N O ` ma M Cn 0 r T "'' O ai c o _ N c ~ ~ ~ 03 E U U O C N :~. 'j .0+ N N ~ N ' ' p~ ~ o~ O '~ C N O N N j 'O N "O C O V N C a fl. ~ N 7 V .(0 ~ U C t0 ~ N N ~ ~ ~ y Q' C C > > ~ W ~ ~ v ~ ~ ~ ~ N c ~ ~ (II ~ C N D ~p N~ Z~ O O C a>Ui~aaii~c~in~i~U~ ATTACHMENT A ~' 0 0 0 M ~_ r R ui a_ U U C O O U U C (6 C LPL -~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2000 RESOLUTION TO ADVANCE FUNDS FOR CERTAIN EXPENDITURES MADE AND/OR TO BE MADE IN CONNECTION WITH THE ACQUISITION, RENOVATION, CONSTRUCTION AND EQUIPPING OF CERTAIN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FOR SCHOOL PROJECTS WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "County Board") adopted a resolution on August 19, 1997 declaring its intention to reimburse itself from the proceeds of one or more tax-exempt financings for certain expenditures made and/or to be made in connection with the acquisition, renovation, construction and equipping of certain capital improvements for school projects, and WHEREAS, the School Board (the "School Board") of the County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "County") adopted a resolution on August 28, 1997 declaring its intention to reimburse itself from the proceeds of one or more tax-exempt financings for certain expenditures made and/or to be made in connection with the acquisition, renovation, construction and equipping of certain capital improvements for school projects, and WHEREAS, the School Board requested an advance to award contracts of $3I8,000 for site development, $129,300 for architecture and engineering costs, value engineering, and surveying/testing, and $226,651 for project management for Glenvar Middle School, for a total advance of $673,951, on June 13, 2000, and WHEREAS, the School Board requested an advance to award contracts of $592,100 for site development, $500,000 for road construction, and $757,992 for project management for the new south county high school, for a total advance of $1,850,092, on June 13, 2000, and WHEREAS, the County Board approved an advance of $1,850,092 for the new south county high school and an advance of $673,951 for Glenvar Middle School on June 13, 2000, and M:\FINANCE\COMMON\Board-Reports\2000\i I-14-0Oe.wpd C'~ WHEREAS, the School Board requested an advance of $9,500,000 to award the construction contract for the new south county high school for $19,094,000 on October 9, 2000, and WHEREAS, the County Board authorized the School Board to enter into a construction contract for $19,094,000 and approved an advance of $9,500,000 for the new south county high school on October 10, 2000, and WHEREAS, the School Board now desire to award the construction contract for the renovations of Glenvar Middle School, and WHEREAS, the Schools Board requested as advance of $4,000,000 to award the construction contract for renovations at Glenvar Middle School for $6,125,000 on November 10, 2000, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the County Board authorizes the School Board to enter into a construction contract for $6,125,000, and advances the sum of $4,000,000, for renovations to Glenvar Middle School. D~:\FINANCE\CONIlVIOI~L\Board-Reports~2000\l 1-14-OOe.wpd ~? ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 14, 2000 AGENDA ITEM: Request to Approve Construction Contract and Advance Funds for Renovations at Glenvar Middle School COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Bids were opened and were very favorable as you may have read in the Thursday newspaper. Assuming the staff review confirms the bid as the lowest and best, it will go to the School Board for approval on Friday and then to you on the 14th. Recommend approval. Last Friday, I went on one of the group tours to several County Schools. It is apparent to me that Northside and William Byrd will both require expansions in the very near future. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Bids will be opened for the renovations at Glenvar Middle School on Wednesday, November 8, 2000 at 2:00 pm. If these bids are favorable, the School Capital Construction Committee and the School Board will meet on Friday, November 10, 2000 at 1:00 pm to award the construction contract. This time has been set aside to take action on the anticipated request from the School Board as a result of their November 10, 2000 meeting. If the bids are favorable, a complete report will be handed out at the meeting on November 14, 2000, based upon action taken at the School construction committee meeting. The School Board will be requesting an advance of funds in order to award the contract immediately. If the bids are not favorable, this item may be pulled from the agenda. SUBMITTED BY: .0,~-a. ~. ~~k..--~ Diane D. Hyatt APPROVED: ~~~ Elmer C. Hodge Chief Financial Officer County Administrator Approved () Motion by No Yes Abs Denied O Church Received O Johnson Referred () McNamara To O Minnix Nickens M:\FINANCE\COMMON\Board-Reports\2000\l l -14-0Oc.wpd ACTION NO. ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 14, 2000 AGENDA ITEM: Requests for Public Hearing and First Reading for Rezoning Ordinances Consent Agenda COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: The first reading on these ordinances is accomplished by adoption of these ordinances in the manner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions, rather approval satisfies the procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public hearing and second reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public hearing on these ordinances is scheduled for December 19th .2000 . The titles of these ordinances are as follows: Petition of First Team Auto Mall to obtain a Special Use Permit for Automobile Repair, Major, located at the northeastern corner of Peters Creek and Barrens Road, Hollins Magisterial District. 2. Petition of Tim T. Snyder to rezone property in the 5200 block of Peters Creek Road from C-2 conditional, General Commercial to C-2, General Commercial, Hollins Magisterial District. 3. Petition of the Roanoke County Planning Commission to amend the 1998 Roanoke County Community Plan by adopting design policies and standards for the Clearbrook Community and to amend the Official Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County by rezoning certain parcels in the Clearbrook Community from AV Agricultural Village and AR Agricultural Residential to C-2 Commercial and further amending said zoning map and text by the addition of the Clearbrook Village Design Overlay District. 4. Petition of Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to rezone specific MAPS ARE ATTACHED; MORE DETAILED INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE IN THE CLERK'S OFFICE. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: (1) That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of these rezoning ordinances for the purpose of scheduling the second reading and public hearing for December 19. 2000 (2) That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth as Items 1 thru 4 inclusive, and that the Clerk is authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action. Respectfully submitted, ~/ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney parcels of property to commercial and industrial designations and to adopt specific design guidelines for commercial and industrial uses in the vicinity of the Dixie Caverns I-81 Interchange, Exit 132. Action Approved Denied Received Referred to Motion by No Yes Abs Church Johnson McNamara Minnix Nickens County of Roanoke For Staff Use Onl Community Development Daze rec~ived: Planning & Zoning /o ~-~ o~ 5204 Bernard Drive ,~ licatiot, fee: P O Box 29800 ~~'v. ~~ Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 placards issued: (S40) 772-2068 FAX (540) 772-2108 ~ ~, 1 i Case Vumber'S /F! /J~/ PC/BZA date: c BOS date: ~v7-/~ ~~r~ ~~ M~- AzL APPLrc~v~'s Check type of application fu-ed (check all that apply) ~ Rezoning ~7 Special Use O Variance Applicants name/address w/zip ~ • David M. Dillon phone: (540) 366-4859 Vice President -General Manager First Team Auto Mall Fa,Y No. (540) 366-7087 P d. Roanoke VA 24019 Owner's name/address w/zip Lewis -Gibbs Corporation Phone (540) 366-4859 6520 Peters Creek Road (540) 366-7087 Roanoke, VA 24019 Fax No. Property Location Northeastern corner of Peters Creek Magisterial District: Hollins and Barrens Road Intersection Community Planning area: Hollins-Neighborhood Cons Tax ivtap No.: 27.13-4-2 C-2 Existing Zoning: Size of parcel(s): Acres: 9.45 AG Existing Land Use: Automobile Dealership, New KEZONING AND'SPECIAL: ZISE; PERbIIT APPLICANTS (R/S) Proposed Zoning: C-2 Proposed Land Use: Automobile Dealership, New and Automobile Repair, Major Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes ~1 No O IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel tneet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes (~ No O IF NO, A VARIA.1~iCE IS REQTJIIZED FIItST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes O No O VARIANCE ~~PPL.ICAIVTS (V) - Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THE rvation 3E it Lrlri~7 'iRi~ 1v11JJll~t7 VI< tl `I 1, V1Vlt"Lr.1L' . Ivs v x/s v 11" x 17" R/s v X ~ Consultation 8 1/2" x 11" concept plan Application fee X ~ Application X Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable Justification X Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners I hereby certiry that I am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the Irnowleige and consent of the owner. / ~~~- ~~- ~~/ ~7/O° Owner's Signature Agent of .Applicant F~ ~1~Ia~~ AND ASSOCIATES, INC. ~I ~~ REFLECTING TOMORROW October 27, 2000 Terrence L. Harrington Director of Planning Department of Planning and Zoning P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 The following is a request for a Special Use Permit to allow First Team Auto Mall to expand their facilities. The proposed expansion will introduce a Body Shop Repair Service that consists of a 17,000 SF building with supporting parking and storage areas. The current zoning, General Commercial (C-2), only allows this use if the facility does not exceed 20% of the existing building on the site. This works out to be approximately 2,800 SF. Knowing this is well under the proposed 17,000 SF, a Special Use Permit is required. The subject parcel is located in the Neighborhood Conservation Community Planning Area, yet th.e majority of the adjoining parcels are either a commercial business, a public service, or a religious assembly. Five adjoiners are residential, one located on the opposite side of Barrens Road, and the remainder located to the North and East. The existing vegetation and topography will screen the facility from neighboring residences. Not only will the parking facility be no closer than 50 feet from a residence, but the building will be set back at least 150 feet and the storage facility for damaged cars will be screened by a fence acid set back 100 feet from the adjoining residential lots. The facility should not create any type of negative impacts to the residential community surrounding the existing facility. After reviewing this application. and concept plan, I would appreciate your consideration in approval of this Special Use Permit. If you have any questions please feel free to call us at anytime. Sincerely, BALZER AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Sheldon Bower SB/cbv Worddocs~staffdir\sblItequest for Special Use Pennit 10-27-00 • PLANNERS ARCHfTEC15 ENGINEERS SURVE`(ORS 1208 Corporate Circle • Roanoke, Virginia 24018 • (540) 772-9580 FAX (540) 772-8050 ~.~ 1 .`~• .\ / Roanoke County BaoM of Supers lsurs 1. 257 Ac. ~~~ Fire Station ~~~~~ i~ .~ ~~ 7401 7404 a ~~~~ c ~, 15. ~a.a ~; 7348 h ~° ~ 1. SJ __ ;~ 9 G, Q `bC 7112 2~.~`2 7340 ~ ~~ ~~ •• ~~ ~~ ~ . 7328 ~~ ~ _.. ' a 23. a N ~ ~ ~~ ~~. \ ,O f ~ \ ~, ~~. ~9gt O \ `ems ~^,5 ~a ~~ \ 20 2 ~1. ~ L-/' / A ~ ~ ~-C' _ ~ -1 \ \ P F ~ \ 8 \ 7 \ ~~ \ \ N_ \ \ \ 6446 ,~ . ~' \\ Z 7 _ \\\ \\\ \ \ \ \ 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ P/urth \~7oanuGe \ \ \ BapLSr\~hurch \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 6402 \ \ \ \ \\\ \\ ~~1 ll,Z ~~ \ gt. \ ~. r •~ Ra ~~••, o h `~ Creel{ \'d~ O 38 2 23~ ~ '.'.1 \2\~~ o_n ~ w_ 6375 '9 JJ ~~ v x~ J /9 pp s. ~ 2~ :7, U . 1 /G ~~, O ZS B ~ lS' ~ ,-~, 2 `S _ v~ O ~ ~~ ~ f ~~.4 15. ;mss -- nos O ~-i %sj s, ~ / I l v ~6 6434 2. 9.45 Ac. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~. ~ 1 ~ ~`~ 1 \,\ ~ ,,~ ~ .\ ~ \, \ ~\ ~ m ~\ ~ ~ ~ \ `n ~ \ \ ~~ ~\ ~ ~~ \ ,, \ w N 3,652,896 ~\ ~ .\ \ \ \~1 6520 3 1 ~ ~~~~~, a ar u 1 ' t i i i~ 1 F~ Y viNtocun'~loraarou iarusb ~ie3~vw sNn~ 8 R 0°, ~ a/~ • • ~i ~! I ~~~ ~ ~~~ NVld1d30N00 ~ b ~ ii {{ Qf lll t @ ~ ~ ~~`dW 01I1V W~11SFJ1~ ~ ~ 3 a ~ r €$ ~ ~ , 1 !lj! sil~9 !!!~4 ~ ~ ~ ~¢ ~~ ~ ~~~gs i a i~Ce~ n S ~~~ ~~ a a 3° U ~ 4 ~~P.€ p U r ~ ~ & ~ ~ ~~~ ~ i ~ bk~3~a~ ~i~ ' ~ ` / _.-- __ ~ m• 1 -n..\ \ ~~ ice-- ~___==~~~i - ~--- _ _ i s ^~ ~l \ I ~\ ~ ~ I f I - i~ \l~ 1 $ .~ i I$ __ ~ I ~~ lll I ljlllllll~l I ~ ~Illl~ll~ I I 1 i I ~ $ss~_ a~ I1~ 1 ~ ~ I I I \ I g '~ik.i~i~/ J ~ ` .~i, ~~ y / l~ I\\11 ~ I I I y~§'s"~ i• fie. ~ ~B~ ~~ / ~~~~ 1 I aw ~\ / \ ~ \ B / ~ ' ~ ~ $i r / / r larw, / I 111 1 l 1 \ ~ ~~ ~ \ ~ ` ~ ~ \` ~ 1 $ ` ~ ;, . ~ ~ $"~ , \ 1 1 - - - ~ al 11111 ~ I ' , / ~ , / 1 ~ ' ~ ~ \ \ ~~ \ \ ~ ~ ~ . g ~ ~ 6~?~s // ~ ~ •~ /1111 ~ i~r i III - ~~~ ~ ~ \ \ - i'< g ' I ;\ \ \~ 1 \ ~/ ~ ~~ ~ ~ / ~ ' i~ ,, i i ~ Q / T ~~ P ,_ ~ »° ~ 1 -~ ~ m Aec 1 k I ~ - ~ 1 I o I 1 .~ 1 a~s? I ~ ~ p~p ~ 1 .gad I ~ ~ I ~ ~ €~~ 11 ~@S` ~ ~~` ~ ~ / I ~ ?~~3 I ~~ 1 1 1 ~~?~~ / I ~ I I ~/ THOMAS R. k BRENI 7328 BARRENS RDAI ROANOKE, VA 24019 TAX MAP g 27.73-J ZDNE: Rl USE: RESIDENTIAL EXISTING CURB EXISTING WATER WILLWA RODNEY OWEN 6446 PETERS CREEK BOAC ROANOKE, VA 24019 TAX MAP d 27.73-3-25 20NE: C2 USE: BUSINESS EXISTIN( SEWER ~ ~ RAL MANAGER R t rFi w ~~ • Puuwene . Anartern . 6NOINlC119 . WRVEYOI/6 19W Ca~porN~ C4sl~ florro4, VINMY 9N19 Fhawi 6~Wi)b96W FAX 6WllfTiOlO 501 Brvpliwry Reetl 6u14 t00 RlNrmontl. WpIM 23236 Riorie: BOt//D4p5i1 FAX'B04RDb2135 i 1098 LakeMp~ P~hwry 8Wb t AYYY10. Yxpm~ 23005 Pima: 80drE5P266B FAX Bdl ° 2067 J CQ G Q W llF- V/~^J LL U Q ~Z _~ O _~ Q ~ n. a w z v ~° O U Z Q ~ ~ DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: OCT 27, 2000 REVISIONS: SCALE: SHEET N0. 1 JOB N0. 30000178.00 County of Roanoke Cotnmtuiity Development Planning & Zoning 5204 Bernard Drive P O Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 772-2108 fJLL;',-LPFLIC'rl.lV7:~ Ch type of application filed (check all that apply} ezoning ^ Special Use Applicants name/address w/zip -r~~.r/'~j~r~~~ Owner=s name/address w/zip Property Location ~Z~~ ~~~' ~~ ~~~~~ Tax Map No.: ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ,~~/„_. Size of parcel(s): Acres: " -~ % "/ Proposed Zoning: Proposed Land Use: Existing Zoning Existing Land Use: ~ ~..-~J ~ L.. Does th arcel meet the minimum lot area, width; and frontage requirements of the requested distt-ict? Yes No ^ IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes ~ No ^ IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes ^ No ^ _::.: Variance of Section(s) ~ of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: ^ r I~ Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF A.NY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. R/S V R/S , V R/S ~ V Consultation ~ 8 lit" s l I" concept plan / Application fee. f Application J Metes and bounds description ~'t~ ProtTers, if applicable Water and se~.ver application ~~ Adjoinnlg property owners ~ 7ustificatioti I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the property o ie own agent or conttac rlaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner. .- ~,~,~ : ~ ~,/"~'~~ Owner=s Signahtre For Staff Use Only Date rece}ved: ~ jC %.,L<~j~J~~ -T--- Apglication tae: ~~~~~.~~ Placards issued: Case tiumber '~^~' ~ 1 ~ ^ Variance ~d~// PC/BZA date: i BOS date: l ~/l`r; Jo Phone: ,~ ~~' ~ ~ ~ ~~' ~ ~ ~' Fax No..~-yr ~ ~ ~ ~ ~-~ Phone .,~ ~i .. ~ ~~%' `'' Fax No. ~ ~~ ~',ra~ ~'`~ .~ Magisterial District: ~~ ~ j~, I Communih~ Planning area: 1l~' REQUEST ~ ~~ Applicant ~ ~~ ~ `'~J ~`'-"~ The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. ,.- / ~~~,$ :-~ ~9f1~:~~~i ~~~i:a ~+~,~,~ lq,;tT i~ f:%s"'. ~s. ~~1.~;;i'~J1~1j{~ tJ~'=~''~=d Ji~L~L°~'yr 1~~~i~ /i;,l~ rPli FJL'=~a"= `,~..~1 /7-~ ~ i~~' ~-!'~ ~' ~ a~r ....~~JF L.~"/+C~~ G-' 't) .~°' ,~°i~~- ~ ~;•+'.~ . a,~ Ln.%Sr~ ~~ f ~^ ~"~`'''~ ~-f~~/.=~r'~' J ~ ~' ~,~=:~{Ja~' s~ ~/~G'-rc'"r~~i ~ °'~d'7..~~'c?~''G ~~~~v~'',.:' ~i,~,'~,~Yi t''!i--',{'.~v^.vL'GL'i.-.C'~::-_~.~ y% ~ !a'~ ~r ~.'V (~ ~,~ J '.{ ~~~'4~ Y~- ~.1: tcs~yd~z / ^^~ ~. ~ '~., g` d +l ~:. ~J~'r.3v~' ~ `~ ~ ~'-~ ~ ~.r >3 a=~'~~j'~c/~re.~'~l ~ ~ ~ ~i;,:j;> `'J ~'','~ Lr ~ ~' ,~~',/~ir'~~ n.;ti.7r~~.... ~ . ~.',~~ ~~? ,~ ~~L'., ?J ~-(~jr'-3 y'f.~~,~.lyi,~9 V Please explain how the project conforms to the general ~ sidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Communiry-Plan. ~~ ~=.r~ v "~ ~ ~ f n~ , "/'~'~a"3t7'T%-$~ % ~ ~ j,:,,,~ .5 i ~ ~'v l ~~i ~r'`tt ~ i ~ ~"~~%'~L` y~;,,'. f~<'~j' 1 a~7 ~ L' L'~ ~ : L r ; ~ ~5'~.~ ``: s~ .~' ~~f ~ ~ t~ '~- ~ c:-r.1 i~:.; I,;.,. !::~:j ~.,t d~ ~c''>'' ~ ~ tam r r' ~i Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the stuTOUnding area, as well as the ~ impacts on public services and facilities, including w,a7ter/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and tire and rescue. {,.1,>t; ~ ! )6. / ~ CG ,~ ~~ ~ f7'~~ ;~~ 7c-~ 1'O'D.~~O~,C'~`f ~. ; N~-~:.~c;~ ~~,,lj~,;~~' r G:+ ~s.~V ~ / ~ ~ L. I t~~d~i~'L ~• ~L7 :J ~ ~ ~Ll ~~ ~!~ ,~L L Y LrC. Ti '.i ~' / l1' T ~~~~ rte; s~ ;-/'~ f~L/~;c/.~ ~I r~l IL'rt.,r- ~~ ~ ~ ~~-~~ rte' ~ rr ~ ~.~c =, ~;! .5 t`C. S; ~L +v'~ ~'~ 1 ~ , / ~" ,;v`~ i«~~~~ ~ ~ ;~~~~~ Div^~ r'~:;i'~ 1 j V1!!i lv vV ~~/~ I ---~.--- -~ 9 ~__ . ~yr3 ~~ ~ ~ --- ,~ I ~~ +C~ _-. Mme! ' a~ I9 ~~~=T.. -. c~r~~'uR.,vr~ g- P° _ ~ y _. __.. . --- 1 I 3A a.~7. wa~+ ~-~s~ o~ a..~w ~-,.; :,.- ~~rw :.~. ~1- PLS.. ~--~ ~'S'f !Z-..t~----___L i 1 r; ~- f • canc. w,g+;.-tL- 9 I X71 tr~1 "+~ii TV"s, ~. SE j ~st.G:L '7'a P+~, ~'~ .^•..,_..._.•~'~ 14-~i~lJ.bM-d. G~6~Id'i'~ ZD6:if:;G. ' R.~~l4s w I ~~Y' ~. ~Z° ~'~.99~ it ~+ - r j \ - y Oc' rrA ~~~ f _ / ~9 - Q / ,\ _ Jra _ ~ ~'3a 20. ~ OS • - 620 ~~ -\ 1~ a-a roB 10 ~. \ s-, .0 70_1 - ~ ?~+* D=3.9 ~}~,,J;.,r ~`I r0 B 4; a~ ~' 1 ~ g ~ ~ rte ~'' sJ+o q 5' a t ~ a 19.1 ~ sv - D,~az~ - ~' `. 4 20 ~~ ~ ~a,u :~ 21. a Me ~ y~ ~C \ ~l {' ~r°~i 2.1' sJJ ,'~ :~ ~ 19. s _ lp, 7 /~ _ 10,24 o SJ45- ~1 ~$J46 ~~`~ 2 4 ~ ac? ~ ~ `x \\ `x ~ ~y }a"iaa 23. i ?ssJr 5~ ~ ~5 ... ~ a~ A~ ~ ^o SJJB , SJ ~~ ~ ,x \;,7728 / SJ47 `'~ ~ C ,'s- - ~ .\ _ ~ \\ u'~, ;se 4.1 > ~ ~ ry,~~0 h n SJJ9 JT 18 1~8 1 ~ti ~~w9 ~? 0 y 5JJ5\~p~,t ya" ~ ~~ ~ ~. atiise o 4'. sJ2z~y~ / ~'' , L7. „ ~A 'ln ~~ ~ ~ ay sJ2o a` "~ ,JJJ ^y Executive ~ti ~, _ ~ ti" 25.1' ati. 1?. ae ~ y`y' r6A % .~.yb' ay ;, sJ29 0 ^`' Park ,~ 7.97 /~ ,y. JJrB ~. ,2 4 g - ° 17\25. ~ !r~ 's z7~ o -16..o~aA y " .~iJO `~,~ / 37.0 ~~ a~%h 6.1~665Jr6h i 9 ay.5y ] C~.1 J 76 -~ ' 9. 3;.08 ~~ D-'.1 17A 9 5.13 Ac D~6.5 ^„7 26.` SJJa aq. a 5771 °s 7A ~ ^ D=_ Z \ 6rBB ° y S SJZI 0-i ' `' (~ ~- s.ssaey ati. aryh ~ a ' ~T; ~O ~ ~j ~ ~ p,18A 271707 a'I'O x~s~n a'I. SJr7 ~~.1 ?6B :. ^ r/ ~f" O~ ~ `° ° , 9B .Q2 7. ~ a ~ ¢,~/. ' sJrs .~ 14: ~, s4 ssr2 sJZa / ~ ~ a "~ S 707 5 :y a ~. 7. 37.os ""r9A X28. ,a5 ~ / a $y 14.1 ,, se 37. ~ti '~ - 02 ~ 28. sze '~O ~ sA ti - ~ ~ 5.00 Ac. D=5.5 ~ 20 ~:s 7Z96 a0'? -+~,~, j~ 510913. yO^y~'{ 4 ~37~ 05 2a6 v SZ97 ~tr~ ~ SJOJ s a 9yo` 9 y~~ (i`' D_ 12. ~~ o ~ / / ~~ 2~ose ' / O 305281 `SJ ~y/ 0'~ gy 3705 \ i~ ~ SJO6 4 / roz 578a ~g 5297 ec, J g'o ^r ~,{5 QS~7,0 s o 11. / 4~'u // ~ 05 03 ~ ~ s799 =5.D 4,7 a 6791 9~, 2 0 0 `~ '. 1. \3 0 ~ 37.08 ~+ ^ '~64 10. p " / 02 N 5291 `~ - ~ / ~0 5 ~f ea.~ -~-.. ... tta Ac. O F' Ev ~ / ~` 6618 SS 0 4 'j ~ Q~ / / s~ .o'ff' 32.6626 ~j s 1 4 s~ ~p G~~ Sao `~2JB t 5296 / \ __. ~~.~ ~}O6ry 6622 O~ p J 2_ i._... / / 6. ~~ °~ 31.6670 ~~~ ~~~~-`_ I " i ~~ 4.28 Ac. `~9 r a~' ~a` - _ ~' ~ \ / ~~ 1a S __ `~ ~~, - 4. ?mo 8q / z - Qo / 0 ~ ,68 5200 b`.6 r _ y, ~ / dk Oe. / / ~~ \ // dry ~~^j S / Q- / oa ?`' r 6.2 / / 1.78 Ac S/EO g ~ P~' Funeral Home ~ / ~ / \ ~ =7.7 ~~ \\ / 8c~.y~ / ~~ R~, ~2~ ~ i F~ / ~ P~- ~~ ~~ i ~~ i ., ... DRAFT October 19, 2000 SEC. 30-58 CVOD Clearbrook Village Overlay District Sec. 30-58-1 Purpose 1. Created in recognition that area has characteristics that result in growth pressures....good road access...public water... public sewer...topography suitable for development... underdeveloped areas... 2. Promote new commercial development compatible with the existing character of Clearbrook avoiding negative impacts of signage, multiple access points, lack of landscaping etc. 2. Implement Community Plan Future Land Use Map and policies that advocate creating the "Village of Clearbrook" 3. Promote development that respects the character/ historical context of the Blue Ridge Parkway, Clearbrook School. and other social and cultural resources in Clearbrook area. Sec. 30-58-2 Creation of Overlay (A) Overlay is created as an amendment to the official zoning map of Roanoke County. (B) Regulations apply to all parcels and land within the designated overlay district. (C) Boundaries of the overlay district may only be amended by action of the BOS pursuant to Section 30-14 of this ordinance. Sec. 30-58-3 Applicability and Administration (A) (B) Sec. 30-58-4 Permitted Uses and Use Restrictions 1 ~3 The uses permitted in the Clearbrook Village Overlay District shall be governed by the underlying zoning district in which the property is located as shown on the official zoning maps, except as otherwise modified below: (A) The following uses shall be prohibited within the Clearbrook Village Overlay District: 1. Residential Uses (None ) 2. Civic Uses Park and Ride Facility Public Assembly 3. Office Uses (None) 4. Commercial Uses Automobile Rental/Leasing Automobile Dealership, Used Automobile Repair Services, Major Boarding Houses Commercial Outdoor Entertainment Commercial Outdoor Sports and Recreation Kennel, Commercial Mini-warehouse Pawn Shop Recreational Vehicle Sales and Service 5. Industrial Uses Recycling Centers and Stations 6. Miscellaneous Uses Parking Facility Broadcasting Towers (B) Unless prohibited in 30-58-4 (A) a Special Use Permit shall be required for all uses listed as a special use in the underlying zoning district. In addition, the following uses shall require a Special Use Permit within the Clearbrook Village Overlay District. An asterisk (*) indicated additional, modified, or more stringent standards are listed in Article IV, Use and Design 2 Standards, for those specific uses. 1. Residential Uses Multi-Family Dwelling* Two-Family Dwelling* 2. Civic Uses (None ) 3. Office Uses (None ) 4. Commercial Uses Agricultural Services* Automobile Repair Services Minor* Commercial Indoor Sports and Recreation Communication Services Construction Sales and Services* Gasoline Station Garden Center* Hotel/Motel/Motor Lodge Retail Sales* Veterinary Hospital/Clinic 5. Industrial Uses (None ) 6. Miscellaneous uses (None) Sec. 30-58-5 Site Development Regulations F-3 General Standards. For additional, modified, or more stringent standards for specific uses see Article IV, Use and Design Standards. (A) Minimum lot requirements 1. Lots served by private well and sewage disposal system; a. Area: 1 acre (43,560 square feet) b. Frontage: 100 feet on a publicly. owned and maintained street. 2. Lots served by either public sewer or water, or both: 3 F3 a. Area: 15,000 square feet. b. Frontage: 75 feet on a publicly owned and maintained street. (B) Minimum setback requirements 1. Front yard: a. Principal structures: 30 feet, or 20 feet when all parking is located behind the front building line. b. Accessory structures: behind front building line. 2. Side yard: None. 3. Rear yard: a. Principal structures: 15 feet b. Accessory structures: 3 feet 4. Where a lot fronts on more than one street, front yard setbacks shall apply to all streets. (C) Maximum height of structures 1. Height limitations: a. Principal structures: 35 feet b. Accessory structures: actual height of principal structure. (D) Maximum coverage 1. Building coverage: 50 percent of the total lot area. 2. Lot coverage: 70 percent of the total lot area. Sec. 30-58-6 Special Regulations in the Clearbrook Village Overlay District The following special regulations shall apply within the Clearbrook Village Overlay District 4 ~' Section 30-92-4.1 Landscaping Provisions in the Clearbrook Village Overlay District (A) Applicability 1. The following landscaping provisions shall apply to all property within the Clearbrook Village Overlay District 2. These standards shall be deemed to supplement, and be in addition to, standards found in Section 30-92 of this ordinance. 3. (B) General Standards/Specifications 1. All landscape plans required for uses within the Clearbrook Village Overlay District shall be prepared by a registered landscape architect, or certified nurseryman. 2. All landscaping shall be alive and in good condition at the time of planting. All landscaping shall be maintained, and replaced, as necessary to insure continued compliance with these provisions. 3. Where specified all deciduous trees shall have a minimum caliper of 2.5 inches at the time of planting. Evergreen trees shall have a minimum height of 8 feet at time of planting 4. Where specified, all shrubs shall have a minimum height of 24 inches at time of planting. 5. Native species shall be use for a minimum of 500 of required plantings. A listing of acceptable native species is available in the Department of Community Development (C) Site Landscaping 1. Landscaped areas shall be provided for the side and rear walls of all buildings. The width of these landscaped areas shall be sufficient to accommodate the required plantings. The following plantings shall be required: a. For buildings walls in excess of 15 feet in height, one tree shall be planted for every 20 lineal 6 ~~- feet of building wall b. For building walls 15 feet or less in height, one tree shall be planted for every 30 lineal feet of building wall. Flexibility in the location of landscaped areas and the placement of the required trees shall be allowed for the purpose of implementing professionally designed landscape plans and for loading, service, or other similar areas. 3. Landscaping shall be provided along the main entrance facade of all buildings, providing a vegetative area between the building and parking areas. The size of the required front landscaped area shall not be less than 20 percent of the square footage of the front facade of the building. The landscaped area shall be professionally designed and planted with a mixture of trees, shrubs and groundcovers. Undeveloped areas between a building and a public or private right-of-way shall be landscaped with berms, trees, shrubs and groundcover. Landscaping plans for these areas shall incorporate a minimum of one large tree, three small trees and seven shrubs for every 30 feet of lot frontage. 4. All above ground stormwater management areas and facilities shall be landscaped with plant materials that are adaptable to being temporarily inundated with water. The facility shall be landscaped in order to create a 75% screening of the facility. A minimum of one-third of all provided plantings shall be evergreen. 5. Landscaping shall be provided around the base of any freestanding sign proposed. The size of the landscaped area shall not be less than one and one-half (1.5) times the square footage of the sign. (D) Landscaping of Parking Areas 1. Where a new, expanded, or reconfigured parking area is proposed adjacent to a public or private street right-of-way, a planting strip shall be established between the parking area and the adjacent right-of-way. The planting strip shall have a minimum width of fifteen (15) feet. An earthen berm, with an average height of 2 feet shall be constructed within the planting strip. Within this strip, one large tree, 7 1'~ (small if overhead utility lines are present) and nineteen shrubs shall be planted for every 30 feet of frontage. In addition, small trees or groundcovers shall be interspersed within the planting area. One- third of all plantings shall be evergreen materials. No uses shall be permitted within the planting strip except underground utility crossings, pedestrian/bike trails, stormwater management facilities which are an integral part of a landscaping plan, and signs as allowed in the district. 2. All parking areas shall incorporate raised interior landscaped areas for the purpose of visually enhancing parking areas. These areas shall be evenly distributed within the parking area and shall be provided in accordance with the following standards: a. One continuous landscaped median, with a minimum width of 10 feet, shall be installed between every four or less rows of parking, or, b. One landscaped peninsula or island with a minimum width of 10 feet shall be located between every 10 to 15 parking spaces. One large tree shall be planted for every 30 feet of continuous median, and shall be planted within every landscaped peninsula or island provided. However, at a minimum, one large tree shall be planted within the parking area for each 10 parking spaces provided. In addition, all parking lot landscaped areas shall include deciduous or evergreen shrubs. 8 Section 30-93-14 (F) Signage Provisions within the Clearbrook Village Overlay District F) Clearbrook Village Overlay District. Signage within the Clearbrook Village Overlay district should be planned, designed and installed to complement a buildings architectural style. All Signage within the Clearbrook Village Overlay district shall comply with C-1 Office District regulations with the following exceptions: 1. Lots within the Clearbrook Village Overlay District shall be allowed a maximum Signage allocation not to exceed one (1) square foot of sign area per one (1) lineal foot of lot frontage. 2. Signage placed on a building wall shall occupy less than 5% of the facade area of that wall 3. All freestanding signs shall be of a monument design and shall meet the following criteria: a. Monument signs, including their structure, shall not exceed seven (7) feet in height, or ten (10) feet in width. b. Signs shall be channel lit, ground lit, or top lit with a shielded light source so as to not cast light onto the path of traffic or on any adjacent road or property. 4. No establishment shall be allowed more than three (3) signs) 5. A maximum of two directional signs shall be allowed per lot, and no directional sign shall exceed two square feet in size. 6. The following signs shall be prohibited in the Clearbrook Village Overlay District: a. Off-Premises Signs b. Temporary Signs c. Portable Signs d. Roof Signs 9 Section 30-94 Exterior Lighting (A) 2. Within the Clearbrook Village Overlay district, no freestanding light pole, including fixture, shall be more than 14 feet above grade. All exterior lights, including security lighting, within the district shall be down-lit or shielded so as not to cast light onto adjoining properties. ~3 10 ~3 ~~, ~_ ~~~ { LEDEND ,~ 3 W ~- J U_ ~ ~ ~ N 0 ~ 0 ~ ~- mQ ~~ Q~ w ~ J ~ C] ^ ~~ ~~~. }~ ~~ !~~ PRIMARY AREA SECON®ARY ARC 3E~2 ~~, 2Q®^ F- Z W ~. 0 ~' w z~> ~®~ ~ ~ UZ}- w~~- ~ ~ Z ~ ~ ~ Z Q ~ ~a~ Qwp CY®U F `f Roanoke County Depaj~tment of Community Development Memorandum T0: Planning Commission FROM: Terrance L. Harrington, AICP DATE: November 2, 2000 RE: Public Hearing on Dixie Caverns Rezoning Initiative; November 7t'', 2000. Your November 7t'' public hearing on this item will be an opportunity to hear public comments on the possible commercial or industrial rezoning of the fourteen parcels identified by the staff. These parcels are identified by the attached maps and fact sheets. The total area under study is approximately 397.5 acres. All except 19.5 acres have been identified as possible candidates for I-1 or I-2 industrial designations. The 19.5 acre parcel across from the Rt. 11/460 and Dow Hollow intersection has been identified as a possible C-2 commercial site. A community open house was held on November 1, 2000. Approximately 60-70 citizens attended. The purpose of the open house was to share information with the community on the specific sites that had been identified for possible rezoning. Many of the attendees were interested in the specific impact of the rezonings on their property. Other comments were more generic, offering a perspective that there was already too much commercial and industrial development in the area, and more should not be encouraged. Five citizens completed comment sheets, which are attached to this information. This is the first of two public hearings that are scheduled on this issue. Your second hearing will be held on December 5th. Staff requests that the Commission hold this evening hearing, and thereafter offer to the staff your comments on the parcels identified. FACT Sheet Harwick Dr./ Rt. 11/40 Properties Number of Parcels: 4 Number o f Owners : 2 Total Acreage; Approximately 183 acres Property Owners: American Electric Power (3) College of Health Sciences (1) Current Zoning: AR Agricultural/Residential Current Community Plan Designation: Industrial Fy Proposed Zoning: I-1 Industrial ~OA~YOKE COUN. TI' Dtixi9 Caverr~,s Ar'a DEPA~TI~lENT OF Drc;~os~d I?-t,ci^,r,siriai Si~e~ Tax !~a~ N o. S3. J4-1-a, ° COMl~U1VITY DE'~'ELO~1~iE1~T 72. ®2- ; _ 1, 2 FACT Sheet Dow Hollow Road/Rt. 11/40 Property Number of Parcels: 1 Number of Owners: 1 Total Acreage: Approximately 19.5 acres Property Owner: Richard i,. Stroupe Current Zoning: Current Community Plan Designation: Core Commercial R-1 ~y Proposed Zoning: C-2 Comrercial t~'•'= '• .~... .. /.•. ;.. /• •.:.•I lY~ .•.' /, ~,~~-, tip, < ~ ~~/ ee> ,~a '~ N 3.sza,esa /~~ .t / , ~o - . ~ • ,per ~ see, ; 6 -z. ~ w I ~ p .~ -oe„o~ . t r ~: '\ 's '-2-1 ~, ,V/ \ ~ e,~ s~aa 3 Ay J ~ ~ 1 S ~ d~~~ ~ ~~ 1.a7_AC. 4. t ~ t9 ae O~ ~O 1.20 ac. 5111 _ ~~- 1 Dri=.,~~"~ "aN t ~ Rt. 940 ~ ~, ~ '~ I t ~ ~ ~ -C 1 ~ I 17. \. - ~ 3.07 ac. \` / ' ~ ,,,, - ~L r- ~ \ /.~. /.- ~ ,,.o ! ~ ~ ~. •. t I8. ~•~ ROANOKE COUNTY Dixie Caver;2s Area DEPARTMENT OF Proposed Commercial Site COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tax ~lfap No. 64.03-1-16 C!.~- i' I /~ FACT Sheet Twine Plollow Road Properties Number of Parcels: 9 Number of Owners: 3 Total Acreage:. Approximately 195 acres Property Owners: Energetic Solutions (1) Roanoke County { 1) Salem Stone Corporation (7) Current Zoning: ACT-3 Agricultural AR Agricult~.~ral/Residential Current Community Plan Designation: Industrial f-9 Proposed Zoning: I-1 or I-2 Industrial ROANOKE COUNTY Dtixie Caverns Area DEPARTMENT 0~' Proposed Ir~,dustr~.at Sites COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tom' Map No. 63.00-1-13, 14, 15; '~ 53.04-3-11, 12, 13, 14, i 5 Comment Sheet Please use the space below to offer any comments you may have on the current rezoning proposals of Roanoke County. All comments will be forwarded to the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors for their consideration: r~ a.e_ ~ V c~ -- Q- ~ 9 lam.. Y ~ ~ .~ u Name (optional): ~-~a,,,,` ~ Address: Phone: ~~; ~~ ~.~~s~ (~4 Comment Sheet Please use the space below to offer any comments you may have on the current rezoning proposals of Roanoke County. All comments will be forwarded to the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors for their consideration: T Name (optional): ~;~,~.~~ ~~ ~~~--~~: Phone. ~~,_5-~-~~_~ ~~~ Comment Sheet Please use the space below to offer any comments you may have on the current rezoning proposals of Roanoke County. All comments will be forwarded to the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors for their consideration: ~/~ In.~ ~nJ u ~3'10~Z~" {~/~ //~, ti,/G- T)F ?f~11 ~J2~d4 ~~,~ASF ~~ ,~~ ~ p tr ~/~J Name (optional) Address: Phone: FY Comment Sheet Please use the space below to offer any comments you may have on the current rezoning proposals of Roanoke County. All comments will be forwarded to the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors for their consideration: .,J/~ %/~i.5 /-s /`~,~' ~~?G•~'~ d~~,ni~r rte 6 }/` /3 ~ /SrG,r S~Ilir~~ G~~ ~J~ `~ c~T ~~,~r ~l .~,~5 ~v/.~ L G~J11/~m5 ~~ ~ Name (optional) Address: f~ Y Phone: Comment Sheet Please use the space below to offer any comments you may have on the current rezoning proposals of Roanoke County. All comments will be forwarded to the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors for their consideration: ( ~ ~~ ~. ~~ ,~ o ,~ ~U,M M ~n ~ 5 Name (optional): ~~~ ti~ Address: ;S Sd `~ G ~ti~~,~~~ Phone: ~ ~t~ ~ ~ ~,~ ~- ~ . ~~~. f-y ACTION # ITEM NUMBER G' °°~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 14, 2000 SUBTECT: First Reading of Ordinance Authorizing the Construction of Water and Sewer Facilities -Stable Road Water and Sewer Extension COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: r~ ;/~~~~,~ f~ "'~ BACKGROUND: Since 1996 four separate water and sewer projects have been constructed by Roanoke County in the Clearbrook area. The latest project was the Clearbrook Lane Water Project constructed this year. The Clearbrook Lane Project was a petition project that originally included the Stable Road area. Because petition projects require that more than 509b of property owners voluntarily participate and only property owners on Clearbrook Lane chose to participate, the Stable Road area was removed from the project? SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: During the past year, there has been much interest for economic development projects within the Stable Road area. In order for this area to develop as a planned growth area, it has become obvious that public water and sewer facilities will be critical in achieving the goal. Staff is proposing that. these utilities be provided by Roanoke County with individual properties paying their share at the time of development. This process would be very similar to recent petition projects in that a special service area would be established with separate fees. The differences are that the project is not the result of a direct petition by property owners and would not have 500 of the property owners participating at this time. The cost estimate for the project is $128,170 for water and $290,596 for sewer resulting in a estimated cost. of $418,766. Attached is a table showing the cost estimates, the properties involved, and the C.~- special connection fee each property would pay. These fees would be in addition to the normal off- site facility fees that would be charged by Roanoke County. Also included is a project map of the Clearbrook area showing the new service area in addition to the service areas that have been approved since 1996. FISCAL IMPACT: In order to encourage economic development in this area, staff would like to appropriate $500,000 to this area. These funds would be used first for the water and sewer extensions as outlined above. The remaining funds will be used toward traffic signal installation and road improvements. This will be a loan that will be repaid to the general fund as customers connect to the water and sewer system. Funds for the stoplight will be repaid through increased tax revenues generated as a result of new businesses in the area, and contributions from future development in the area (ie, the special use permit that was granted to Foursquare Evangel Church). STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve construction of the water and sewer facilities to the area, establish a special service area, with special connection fees, and provide funding as a loan in the amount of $500,000 for the project, including partial payment toward traffic signal installation and road improvements. The loan will be paid back to the general fund as properties develop. SUBMITTED BY: ,~?i Gary Robertson, P.E. Utility Director Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to ACTION Motion by:__ APPROVED: r Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator VOTE No Yes Abs Church Johnson McNamara Minnix Nickens -/ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2000 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CREATION OF A LOCAL PUBLIC WORKS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, STABLE ROAD WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT, APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF WATER AND SEWER FACILITIES THEREIN, IMPOSING AND ALLOCATING CERTAIN FEES OR ASSESSMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF PROPERTY LOCATED THEREIN WHEREAS, Ordinance 112288-7 authorizes the financing of local public works improvements and the imposition of special assessments upon abutting property owners upon the adoption of an appropriate ordinance by the Board of Supervisors; and WHEREAS, Sections 15.2-2243, 15.2-2400 and 15.2-2404, et seq. authorize the County to create and establish a general water and sewer improvement program for a designated area of the County having related and common sewer and water conditions, to install certain public works improvements, and to impose fees, charges and assessments for said improvements; and WHEREAS, the extension of the public water and sewer systems and the creation of a special utility service district will alleviate public health and safety problems and promote economic development; and WHEREAS, the Board hereby establishes the "Stable Road Water and Sewer District"; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this Ordinance was held on U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\UTILITY\clearbrooksewerwaterord.wpd 1 ~l November 14, 2000, and the second reading and public hearing was held December 19, 2000; and BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the authority of Ordinance 112288-7, the Board authorizes and approves a local public works improvement project, namely, public sewer and water extensions for the Stable Road community. That pursuant to the authority of Section 15.2- 2243, the Board establishes a general water and sewer improvement program for the Stable Road community. The total construction cost of this public sewer project is estimated to be $418,766, to be assessed against the properties within the project service district as shown on the attached Exhibit A. That there is hereby appropriated for this project the sum of $418,766 from the General Fund Unappropriated Balance. 2. That the "Stable Road Water and Sewer District" is shown and designated on the attached plat entitled "Clearbrook Area Water and Sewer Service Districts" prepared by the Roanoke County Utility Department, dated November 2000 (Exhibit B). The Utility Department shall construct in and adjacent to the Project Service District sewer and water lines and appurtenant facilities as shown in the map of this area, and shall acquire easements for these lines and facilities. U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\UTILITY\clearbrooksewerwaterord.wpd 2 _/ 3. That the owner, subdivider or developer of property located within the Project Service District shall, before or at the time of issuance of a building permit for the construction of any building or structure to be located on his or her property which is to be the subject of development or subdivision, pay or provide for the payment of a share of the cost of construction of the sewer and water facilities, as shown in Exhibit A. This is in addition to the connection fees and off-site facility fees that are imposed by the County. 4. In any case where a payment by the owner, subdivider or developer is required prior to construction of the sewer and water facilities, the amount paid by the owner, subdivider or developer shall be held in an interest bearing account for the benefit of the owner, subdivider or developer until expended, or, in lieu of such payment, the Board of Supervisors may provide for the posting of a personal, corporate or property bond, cash escrow, letter of credit or other method of performance guarantee satisfactory to it conditioned on payment at commencement of such construction. 5. Any owner, subdivider or developer of property located within the project service district who pays a share of the costs of construction of the sewer and water facilities after completion of construction by the Utility Department shall pay such share of the cost of construction of said facilities together with interest U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\UTILITY\clearbrooksewerwaterord.wpd 3 G -/ on the unpaid balance of such share from the date of completion of such construction until paid, which interest shall be computed at the rate of 6 percent per annum. 6. That the payment by owner, subdivider or developer of property in the Project Service District shall be returned to the General Fund until such time as the advance has been repaid. 7. That the County Administrator is authorized to take such actions and execute such documents as may be necessary to accomplish the purposes of this transaction, all upon form approved by the County Attorney. 8. That this ordinance shall be effective from and after the date of its adoption. U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\UTILITY\clearbrooksewerwaterord.wpd 4 EXHIBIT A CLEARBROOK AREA -WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS STABLE ROAD WATER EXTENSION CONNECTION FEE FOR MINIMUM FRONTAGE $7,700 Minimum Frontage Length = 150 Cost per Foot for Frontage Greater Than Minimum = $42.00 PROPERTIES SERVED BY WATER IMPROVEMENTS Construction Tax Parcel Property Owner Fee 88.03-01-09 VINE 8~ BRANCH, INC. $39,620 88.03-01-29 JACKSON ASSOCIATES LIMITED $28,322 88.03-01-29.1 ALMERINDO & JOANN MAZZARELLA $7,700 88.03-01-31 DIRK LINTON BEASLEY $7,700 88.03-01-32 DIRK LINTON BEASLEY $7,700 88.03-01-33 DIRK LINTON BEASLEY $7,700 88.03-01-34 DIRK LINTON BEASLEY $9,968 88.03-01-35 ALVIN L. MILLER 1$ 9,460 $128,170 CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE uanti Unit Cost Total Cost 8-inch Water Line 1,935 $32 $61,920 Fire Hydrants 5 $2,000 $10,000 Road Crossings 2 $20,000 $40,000 Service Connections 9 $500 $4,500 Contingency 11 750 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST = $128,170 EXHIBIT A CLEARBROOK AREA -SEWER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS ~ ,~ ~ STABLE ROAD SEWER LINE EXTENSION CONNECTION FEE FOR MINIMUM FRONTAGE _ $11,800 Minimum Frontage Length = 150 Feet Cost per Foot for Frontage Greater Than Minimum = $60.00 PROPERTIES SERVED BY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS Construction P.S. 8~ F.M. Total Tax Parcel Property Owner Fee Surcharge Fee 88.03-01-01 DR. JOAN M. RESK $11,800 $700 $12,500 03-01-01.1 88 VINE 8 BRANCH, INC $35,200 $2,002 $37,202 . 88.03-01-06 MOD-U-KRAF HOMES, INC. $29,800 $1,651 $31,451 03-01-09 88 VINE & BRANCH, INC $57,400 $12,957 $70,357 . 03-01-29 88 JACKSON ASSOCIATES LIMITED $41,260 $2,583 $43,843 . 03-01-29.1 88 ALMERINDO & JOANN MAZZARELLA $11,800 $903 $12,703 . 88.03-01-31 DIRK LINTON BEASLEY $11,800 $700 $12,500 03-01-32 88 DIRK LINTON BEASLEY $11,800 $700 $12,500 . 88.03-01-33 DIRK LINTON BEASLEY $11,800 $700 $12,500 03-01-34 88 DIRK LINTON BEASLEY $15,040 $700 $15,740 . 88.03-01-35 ALVIN L. MILLER 2$ 8,600 $700 2$ 9,300 $266,300 $24,296 $290,596 CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE uanti Unit Cost Total Cost 8-inch Sewer Line 2,800 $45 $126,000 Manholes 13 $2,500 $32,500 Road Crossings 4 $25,000 $100,000 Service Connections 11 $500 $5,500 enc Contin 26 596 y g ESTI MATED CONSTRUCTION COST = $290,596 • ~~ R/OGE CLEARBROOK ~~~ LEGEND Stable Road Water 8c Sewer District (Ordinance Pending) Clearbrook Lane Water Service District (Ordinance 110999-2) Clearbrook School & Station 7 Water 8c Sewer District (Ordinance 051298-6) WATER & S ~ ,._, s SERVICE DIS ~ . ,. ; ;: _{ ,.. NOVEMBER Clearbrook Sewage Pump Station and Force Main NOT TO SC Service Area (Ordinance 051298-6) ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER ~1"'~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 14, 2000 SUBJECT: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1. BLUE RIDGE ALLIANCE FOR ORGAN AND TISSUE DONATION The two year term of Mary H. Allen expires November 21, 2000. This committee is currently inactive but may become active again in 2001. 2. BLUE RIDGE COMMUNITY SERVICES The three year term of Gary Kelly expires December 31, 2000. Mr. Kelly was filling the unexpired term of Susan Scheibe. The three year term of Member at large Mr. John M. Hudgins, Jr. expires December 31, 2000. Mr. Hudgins is filling the unexpired term of Rita Gliniecki. The at large appointment is recommended by the Blue Ridge Community Services Board of Directors and ratified by the Board of Supervisors. 3. GRIEVANCE PANEL The three year terms of Henry H. Wise, Alternate; King Harvey, Alternate; and Karen Ewell, Alternate, expired October 28, 2000. 4. HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION SAFETY COMMISSION The four year terms of Jay E. Gaylor, Legal Representative, and James M. Martin, Senior Representative, expired June 30, 1999. Mr. Martin has notified the Clerk's Office that he does not wish to serve another term. The four year terms of Thomas A. Abbott, Citizen at Large; Gordon E. Saul, Neighborhood; and Hank Gregory, Citizen at Large, Jr., expired June 30, 2000. Mr. 1 ~'"' Gregory has served two successive terms and is NOT eligible to serve another term. The one year term for a youth representative who must be attending a Roanoke County high school is vacant. 5. PLANNING COMMISSION The four year term of AI G. Thomason, Sr., Windsor Hills Magisterial District, expires December 31, 2000 6. SOCIAL SERVICES ADVISORY BOARD The four-year term of Robert H. Lewis, Vinton Magisterial District, expired August 1, 2000. Mr. Lewis has served two consecutive terms and is not eligible for reappointment. SUBMITTED BY: /d Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: ~~~ ~~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE No. Yes Abs Approved () Motion by: Church _ _ Denied () Johnson Received () McNamara- _ _ Referred () Minnix To () Nickens _ _ _ 2 Sl-lam AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2000 RESOLUTION 111400-3 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM J -CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for November 14, 2000 designated as Item J -Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 16, inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of Minutes -September 12, 2000 (Regular Meeting), September 26, 2000 (Regular Meeting and Joint Meeting with the Vinton Town Council), October 10, 2000 (Joint Meeting with Roanoke City Council), October 10, 2000 (Regular Meeting), and October 10, 2000 (Joint Meeting with Montgomery County Board of Supervisors) 2. Confirmation of committee appointment to the Industrial Development Authority. 3. Resolutions of Appreciation upon the retirement of a. Ricky L. Etter, Sheriff's Office b. Martha A. Gladden, Social Services Department c. Jeffrey M. Swortzel, Police Department d. Roger F. Robinson, Police Department e. Edward A. Shotwell, Police Department f. Linda S. Hogan; Police Department 4. Acceptance by the Police Department of the Bureau of Justice Assistance $31,454 block grant for law enforcement support. 5. Acceptance of water and sewerfacilities serving The Gardens of Cotton Hill, Section 5 (Phase I). 1 r carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ,~~L-~-~ >~! Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Ray Lavinder, Chief of Police Diane D. Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development David Porter, IDA Secretary/Treasurer Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Ray Lavinder, Chief of Police Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff Janet Scheid, Senior Planner 3 September 12, 2000 519 Roanoke County Administration Center 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 September 12, 2000 The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the second Tuesday and the first regularly scheduled meeting of the month of September, 2000. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman McNamara called the meeting to order at 3:01 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Joseph McNamara, Vice Chairman. H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix (Arrived 3:30 p.m.), Supervisors Joseph B. "Butch" Church, Bob L. Johnson, Harry C. Nickens (Arrived 3:06 p.m.) MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney; Mary H. Allen, Clerk to the Board; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator; Dan R. O'Donnell, Assistant County Administrator IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES The invocation was given by Father Joseph Lehman, Our Lady of Nazareth Catholic Church. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited by all present. IN RE: REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS Mr. Mahoney advised that Supervisor Church requested a Closed Meeting pursuant to Section 2.1-344 A (7), pertaining to probable litigation concerning insurance September 12, 2000 the intention of improving education for girls; and WHEREAS, Ms. Hamlett is also active in other volunteer activities, serving as a Deacon in her church, chairman of the board of the Easter Seal Society of Virginia and board member of the Council of Community Services. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia expresses its congratulations to Shelby Paisley Hamlett for her 40 years of dedicated service to others and by attaining this high achievement in the General Federation of Women's Clubs; and FURTHER, the Board expresses its pride that an outstanding national leader and active, caring volunteer is a resident of the County of Roanoke. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Minnix IN RE: NEW BUSINESS 1. Request from the Senior and Challenaed Citizens Commission for $1,000 funding to reproduce public awareness video, and update on the Commission activities. (Debbie Pitts, Assistant Director of Recreation) A-091200-2 Ms. Pitts reported that in 1997, the Board of Supervisors appointed the Commission for Senior and Challenged Citizens to look at the needs of this population in Roanoke County. The Commission has met regularly since January 6, 1998, focusing on the issues of Education, Transportation, Accessible Housing, and the Americans with Disabilities Act. On July 14, 1998, the Commission recommended emphasizing improvements for Special Education services in the County Schools and Transportation services for citizens through the CORTRAN service. Ms. Pitts introduced the members of the Commission who were present. Ms. Pitts advised. that the Commission has concluded that services are available for citizens but they are not aware of them. The Commission has been working September 12, 2000 523 A-091200-3 Mr. Chambliss reported that RADAR, which operates the CORTRAN program in Roanoke County has been approved for a capital grant for the purchase of two lift equipped vans at the cost of $90,000 to replace two older vans of their fleet. The State will provide $85,000 and RADAR will provide the $4,500 match. Section 18 operating funds of $23,121 is used to offset some of the cost incurred to provide mass transportation service to the rural service areas. Both of these sources of funds must be received by a local unit of government and then passed to the service provider. He requested acceptance of the grant and the Section 18 operating funds. In response to a question from Supervisor Nickens, Mr. Chambliss advised that the old vans are part of RADAR's fleet and not the County's fleet. Supervisor McNamara moved to approve acceptance of grants. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Minnix 3. Request for authorization to execute an updated contract with the Unified Human Services Transportation System. Inc. to provide CORTRAN Services. (John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator) Mr. Chambliss advised that the CORTRAN program provides services to qualified County residents during the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. Reservations are on a first-come, first-served basis. The new contract with RADAR is based on a $25.00 per hour rate, less fares received. The average one-way September 12, 2000 ~z~ AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None 5. Request to adopt resolution authorizing a comprehensive rezoning of various parcels in the Dixie Caverns area of Roanoke County for purposes of implementing the 1998 Roanoke County Community Plan. (Terry Harrington, County Planner R-091200-5 Mr. Harrington reported that in May, the Board adopted an amendment to the 1998 Roanoke County Community Plan which included an updated future land use map for the Dixie Caverns area. The action also adopted Community Plan policies pertaining to design guidelines appropriate for new commercial and industrial development in this area which designated additional land suitable for future commercial and industrial development, and specified design goals for development in the area. The resolution authorizes and directs the Planning Commission to evaluate and recommend specific parcels in the Dixie Caverns area that are suitable for commercial or industrial zoning. In response to a question from Supervisor Johnson, Mr. Harrington advised that the staff will notify every property owner and there will be one or two community meetings. Supervisor Johnson asked that Mr. Harrington make sure that all of the residents are well informed even if additional community meetings are necessary. Supervisor Church asked that he be included in any meetings since this was located in his district. Supervisor Church moved to adopt the resolution. The motion carried by September 12, 2000 ~27 6. Request for acceptance of $180,000 Virginia Department of Transportation Recreational Access Grant to construct the North Roanoke Park access road. (Pete Haislip, Director of Parks, Recreation and Tourism) A-091200-6 Mr. Haislip advised that after two community planning meetings, the Board of Supervisors on December 21, 1999, approved the master plan for a new park in North Roanoke on the 8-acre "AMP" property located on Hollins Road. Planned facilities include two soccer fields, a parking lot, a small picnic pavilion, playground, and a walking trail. A major and expensive component of this project is the construction of a new road to access the site. In April of 1999, a grant was submitted to the Virginia Department of Transportation requesting funds from the Recreational Access Program to construct this road. On June 15, 1999, the Commonwealth Transportation Board approved the request for $180,000. This grant award, coupled with a Land and Water Conservation Fund grant of $50,000, and a previous $50,000 Board appropriation, will allow Parks and Recreation to go forward with the construction of this project. County policy requires these funds be appropriated to the Parks and Recreation budget. Mr. Haislip recommended acceptance of $180,000 from the Commonwealth Transportation Board for the funding of the construction of an access road for a park in North Roanoke. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve acceptance of the grant. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None September 12, 2000 Operating Reserve and repaid interest free over the next three years. This reserve currently has a balance of $1,210,000. This method of financing can also be used to fund the purchase of two pumpers and two ladder trucks that were also included in the budget, will save the County interest expense and still replenish money to the Future School Operating Reserve for future use. Ms. Green recommended that the Board finance $736,680 with an interest free loan from the Future School Operating Reserve to be repaid over the next three years, and allow General Services to keep the proceeds from the sale of the existing vehicles to offset the cost of the down payment. In response to questions from the Board members, Ms. Green advised that the staff will be trained to fix any automation problems, and that there will be extended warranties available to purchase for the life of the vehicles. Supervisors Minnix, Church and McNamara expressed concern about using the Future School Operating Reserve, especially without input and agreement from the School Board. Supervisor McNamara and Church expressed support for appropriating the funds from the General Fund Unappropriated Balance and felt it was sending the wrong message to use funds earmarked for future school. Supervisor McNamara moved to approve appropriating the funds from the General Fund Unappropriated Balance to purchase the refuse vehicles. Mr. Hodge advised that this would decrease the General Fund balance and could affect future bond issues. He explained that Chief Financial Officer Diane Hyatt had discussed use of the Future School Reserve with School Finance Director Penny Hodge and responded that he would contact the School Board and ask concurrence to use funds from the Future School Operating Reserve that will be paid back to that fund. Supervisor Nickens offered a substitute motion that action be tabled until the September 26 meeting to get concurrence from the School Board but withdrew that September 12, 2000 531 cost over $2 million. Based on the amount and quality of work which Project Impact has produced for the Roanoke Valley, the steering committee voted to seek additional funding from the four local governments to continue the project through the end of the fiscal year. Roanoke, Salem and Vinton have already appropriated funding through June 30, 2001, and Roanoke County's per capita share is $12,800, which is available in the Board Contingency Fund. Ms. Green requested that the Board appropriate $12,800 from the Board Contingency Fund to fund Roanoke County's share of Project Impact through June 30, 2001. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve $12,800 funding from the Board Contingency Fund. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None IN RE: FIRST READINGS OF ORDINANCES 1. First reading of ordinance to extend the current franchise agreement with Adelphia (Salem) Cable for ninety days. (Joseph Obenshain. Senior Assistant County Attorney) Mr. Mahoney reported that the franchise agreements in both localities were to expire on October 4, 1999, and were extended for ninety days until January 2, 2000, and again for additional ninety day periods until October 1, 2000. In addition to the September 12, 2000 2. First reading of ordinance authorizing acquisition of necessary easements to construct the Campbell Hills Water Line project. (Gary Robertson, Utility Director) Mr. Robertson reported that the Board has approved the Campbell Hills Water Line Project under the Capital Improvement Program for the current year. This project will provide Spring Hollow water to the Campbell Hills subdivision, which is adjacent to the water treatment facility. Potable water is currently provided by ground water wells that have poor quality because of hardness. Construction of this water line will allow these wells to be abandoned, thereby reducing maintenance requirements for the water system. This project is expected to begin in October 2000 and be completed by February 2001. The Project will require acquisition of five (5) separate easements from three property owners. Preliminary negotiations have begun with the affected property owners and offers have been made based upon 40% of the assessed land value plus cost of expected damage caused by the work. These offers are consistent with the County's past policy for acquiring easements. Mr. Robertson requested adoption of the ordinance authorizing the acquisition of easements. Supervisor Church moved to approve the first reading and set the second reading for September 26, 2000. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None September 12, 2000 535 existing easement for a total width of 20 feet. Supervisor Johnson moved to waive the first reading and adopt the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None ORDINANCE 091200-9 AUTHORIZING THE VACATION AND QUIT- CLAIM OF A PORTION OF AN EXISTING 20-FOOT SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT AND ACCEPTANCE OF A RELOCATED PORTION OF THE SAME EASEMENT ACROSS LOT 2, BLOCK 2, SECTION 1, LAKELAND FARMS WHEREAS, by Deed dated March 1, 1977, Ezera E. Wertz and Elsie M. Wertz conveyed to the Roanoke County Public Service Authority (predecessor in title to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia), a sewer line easement, twenty feet (20') in width, across a tract of land owned by the Wertz's, in connection with the sewer system designated as "Interceptor from Nottingham Hills to Castle Rock West, Section 1 "; and, WHEREAS, Lakeland Developers, Inc., subsequently subdivided and developed a portion of said tract of land into Section 1, Lakeland Farms, as shown upon the plat dated November 17, 1977, made by T.P. Parker & Son, of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Plat Book 9, page 123; and, WHEREAS, the above-described 20' sewer easement is referenced, but incorrectly shown upon the subdivision plat as an "existing 15' san. sew. esmt."; and, WHEREAS, the petitioners, Claude L. Piche and Susan H. Piche, husband and wife, are the owners of Lot 2, Block 2, Section 1, Lakeland Farms; and, WHEREAS, a recent survey of said property reflects that the residential dwelling located thereon encroaches upon the north side of the 20' sanitary sewer easement; and, WHEREAS, the petitioners have requested that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, vacate and quit-claim the northern five feet (5') of the sanitary sewer easement and accept in exchange an additional five feet (5') for sanitary sewer easement purposes on the southern side of the existing easement for a total width of twenty feet (20'); and, WHEREAS, the relocation has been accomplished without cost to the September 12, 2000 537 IN RE: SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Second reading of ordinance authorizing quitclaim and release of a 15-foot sanitar~r sewer easement, recorded in Plat Book 16, Page 41 Edyemont of Vinton, Section 1, within the boundaries of Sunflower Drive, south of the intersection of Tulip Lane and Sunflower Drive and a 15-foot sanitary sewer easement, and 15- foot water line easement recorded in Plat Book 9, Paste 281, Spring Grove Section 7, within the boundaries of Sunflower Drive, north of the intersection of Ivy Lane and Sunflower Drive, being located in Edgemont of Vinton, Section 2, in the Vinton Magisterial District. (Arnold Covey, Community Development Director 0-091200-10 There was no discussion and no citizens present to speak. Supervisor Nickens moved to adopt the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None ORDINANCE 091200-10 AUTHORIZING QUIT-CLAIM AND RELEASE OF PORTION OF A FIFTEEN-FOOT SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 16, PAGE 41, AND QUIT-CLAIM AND September 12, 2000 reading was held on September 12, 2000; and, 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the interests in real estate to be released are hereby made available for other public uses by conveyance to the Commonwealth of Virginia for acceptance of Sunflower Drive into the state secondary road system by the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT). 3. That quit-claim and release to the Commonwealth of Virginia of the portion of the 15' sanitary sewer easement recorded in Plat Book 16, page 41, of the 15' sanitary sewer easement recorded in Plat Book 9, page 281, and further shown on Plat Book 16, page 41, and of the 15' water line easement recorded in Plat Book 9, page 281, and further shown on Plat Book 16, page 41, within the boundaries of Sunflower Drive as shown on Exhibits A and B, is hereby authorized subject to the following conditions: a. VDOT issuance of a permit for any and all water lines or pipes, sanitary sewer lines or pipes, and any related appurtenances or facilities. b. The facilities located within the 50-foot right-of-way, under Sunflower Drive, Edgemont of Vinton, Section 2, shown on Plat Book 16, page 41, and Plat Book 9, page 281, may continue to occupy the street or highway in the existing condition and location. c. The release would be for so long as the subject sections of Sunflower Drive are used as part of the public street or highway system. 4. That the subject easements are not vacated hereby and shall revert to the County in the event of abandonment of the street or highway. 5. That the County Administrator, or an Assistant County Administrator, is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such further actions as may be necessary to accomplish this conveyance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 6. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None September 12, 2000 541 Transportation Secondary System. 2. Acceptance of sanitary sewer facilities serving Pennwood Townhomes. 3. Donations of variable width storm drainage easements on Autumn Drive, Hollins Magisterial District, from (a) Harold B. and Hazel G. Hodges; (b) Joseph K. and Virginia A. Bushnell; (c) A. Jennings and Doris K. Robertson and (d) Stuart J. and Geraldine H. Wamsley. 4. Request to approve the Annual Performance Contract with Blue Ridge Community Services. 5. Request to adopt resolution agreeing to co-sponsor "Sustainable Growth for Communities" seminar with the Western Virginia Land Trust 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the Consent Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None RESOLUTION 091200-11.a REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF EDGEMONT CIRCLE AND THE REMAINING PORTION SUNFLOWER DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM WHEREAS, the streets described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(a), fully incorporated herein by reference, are shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, and WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised this Board the streets meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation, and WHEREAS, the County and the Virginia Department of Transportation have entered into an agreement on March 9, 1999, for comprehensive stormwater detention which applies to this request for addition, September 12, 2000 October 31, 2000; BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, agrees to co-sponsor the Sustainable Growth For Communities seminar along with the Western Virginia Land Trust. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None IN RE: CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS 1. Nancy Hughes, 2506 Sharmar Road, expressed concern and opposition to using the school reserve funds for purchase of solid waste vehicles as requested earlier in the meeting, and also questioned the County taking the former Mount Vernon Elementary School for use as an Administration Center and now a Recreation Center. IN RE: REPORTS Supervisor McNamara moved to receive and file the following reports. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund September 12, 2000 that the road width is too short and amount of traffic is too heavy on Penn Forest Boulevard to allow parking on the street and there will be "No Parking" signs posted in the area. Supervisor Church: (1) He advised that he attended the September 6, 2000 meeting on the Virginia Gas Pipeline and felt that it was very informative and noted that state laws regulate the location and public notice of gas pipelines. He asked Mr. Mahoney to check on potential future state legislation that would force co-location of pipelines. (2) He announced that he is looking forward to attending the Opening Ceremony of the Center for Research and Technology on October 23, 2000, and advised Delegate Devolites from Northern Virginia is working on getting representatives from technology businesses in her area to attend. Supervisor McNamara: (1) He announced that the regional EMS Training Center ribbon cutting ceremony was held last week and that it is a fabulous facility. (2) He thanked the Parks and Recreation staff for getting the additional parking spaces at Garst Mill Park. IN RE: OTHER BUSINESS MR. Hodge announced that there are several upcoming important County special events that the Board is invited to: (1) Learning for Work: Whatever It Takes - October 20, 2000; (2) Opening Ceremony -Center for Research and Technology - September 12, 2000 Back Creek Stations; (2) information on the Cave Spring Ladder Crew; (3) proposed mutual aid agreement with Roanoke City Fire-EMS; (4) Floyd County Officials Meeting; and (5) Fort Lewis Rescue response concerns. There was discussion on the City charging for EMS calls in the County, the need for a joint station with the City of Roanoke, the need to hire additional staff; how to fund the additional staff; and how to resolve staffing problems at Bent Mountain, Mount Pleasant and Fort Lewis stations. Mr. Hodge was directed to bring back a report to the October 10, 2000 meeting with specific recommendations that would resolve the staff allocation problems at Mount Pleasant, Fort Lewis and other areas. IN RE: OTHER DISCUSSION There was discussion of Item 7 under New Business, requesting funds for the solid waste trucks. Chief Financial Officer Diane Hyatt reported on a telephone discussion with School Superintendent Dr. Weber and reported on the new South County High School construction bids. Fire and Rescue Chief Rick Burch also discussed the timing of the bids for the fire trucks IN RE: CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION R-091200-12 September 12, 2000 Submitted by, Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board Approved by, Joseph McNamara Chairman September 26, 2000 551 Roanoke County Administration Center 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 September 26, 2000 The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, .met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the fourth Tuesday and the second regularly scheduled meeting of the month of September, 2000. !N RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman McNamara called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Joseph McNamara, Vice Chairman H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix, Supervisors Joseph B. "Butch" Church, Bob L. Johnson, Harry C. Nickens MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney; Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk to the Board; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator; Dan R. O'Donnell, Assistant County Administrator IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES The invocation was given by The Rev. James W. Reynolds, Retired, United Methodist Church. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited by all present. IN RE: REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS Supervisor Johnson requested a Closed Meeting pursuant to Session 2.1- 344 A (7) consultation with legal counsel pertaining to probable litigation re: Virginia Gas September 26, 2000 553 response to his inquiry, Mr. Robertson advised that they only had to use the pumps during peak times once this past winter but the potential cost could be as high as $45,000 or $50,000 if it should become necessary in the future. Supervisor Johnson asked that this be an ongoing item for consideration in future negotiations with other companies. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the execution of contract. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None 2. Request to approve the budget for the Day Reporting Program for FY 2000-2001. (John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator) A-092600-2 Mr. Chambliss advised that after the closing of Youth Haven Il last year, staff from the City of Roanoke and the County developed the Day Reporting Program to address the needs of the youth in the Roanoke Valley. Youth Haven II was a program for young women only, and there was a need for a co-educational treatment center and an alternative to secure detention. The budget for the program is $261,218 and the funding comes from part of the County's share from the Virginia Juvenile Community Crime Control Act grant, the local match that was required for the grant, and $80 per day fees to be paid by other jurisdictions using the facility. He introduced Program Manager Sandy Worley and advised that the program comes under the supervision of a committee comprised of the Roanoke City Court Services Director; Mike Lazzuri, Roanoke County Services Director; and Dr. Betty McCrary, Roanoke County Director of September 26, 2000 555 3. 4. 5. IN RE: FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. First reading of ordinance amending Ordinance 011299-6 "Roanoke Community Plan" for adoption of a new future land use map for the Hollins Exit 146) I-81 Interchange area. (Janet Scheid, Senior Planner) Ms. Scheid advised that as a result of increasing traffic along the Interstate 81 corridor, the Virginia Department of Transportation has proposed improving the interstate to provide increased carrying capacity and to address safety concerns. These proposed improvements include the re-design of Exit 146 at Plantation Road. The Board asked staff to analyze the potential land use impacts and the opportunities that road improvements might provide. An additional objective of the project study was to determine suitable land uses that could promote economic opportunities while limiting haphazard development. Two community meeting were held during the past year and the proposed Community Pfan revisions reflect citizen input from these meeting, staff analysis of current and anticipated conditions and Planning September 26, 2000 557 jJoseph Obenshain, Senior Assistant County Attorney) 0-092600-3 Mr. Mahoney advised that they have been no changes since the first reading. There was no discussion. Supervisor Church moved to adopt the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None ORDINANCE 092600-3 EXTENDING THE FRANCHISE OF BLACKSBURG/SALEM CABLEVISION ,INC. D/B/A SALEM CABLE TV TO OPERATE A CABLE TELEVISION SYSTEM IN ROANOKE COUNTY FOR A PERIOD OF 90 DAYS WHEREAS, Blacksburg/Salem Cablevision, d/b/a Salem Cable TV, a wholly owned subsidiary of Adelphia Communications Corporation, currently holds a franchise granted by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, to operate a cable television system within portions of Roanoke County which franchise expired on October 4, 1999, and was extended for a period of ninety (90) days by action of the Board of Supervisors on September 28, 1999, and for additional ninety (90) day periods by action of the Board on January 11, 2000, March 28, 2000, and June 27, 2000; and WHEREAS, negotiations are currently under way between Blacksburg/Salem Cablevision, Inc., d/b/a Salem Cable TV, and the County of Roanoke for the renewal of this franchise agreement, which negotiations may not be concluded sufficiently .prior to such date to permit adoption of a new franchise agreement by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke prior to the expiration of the current franchise agreement on or about October 1, 2000; and WHEREAS, Blacksburg/Salem Cablevision, Inc., d/b/a Salem Cable TV, is prohibited by federal law from operating a cable television system within any jurisdiction without a franchise agreement or extension as defined by federal law; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on September 12, 2000, and the second reading of this ordinance was held on September 26, 2000. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That in order to permit Blacksburg/Salem Cablevision, Inc., d/b/a Salem Cable TV, to continue to operate a cable television franchise within the territorial limits of Roanoke County, Virginia, after October 1, 2000, and to prevent any interruption of cable television services to customers of Salem Cable TV, the franchise of Blacksburg/ Salem Cablevision, Inc., d/b/a Salem Cable TV, for the operation of a cable television system within Roanoke County, Virginia, is hereby extended for a period of ninety (90) days beginning at 12:00, midnight, on October 1, 2000, under the September 26, 2000 559 TAX MAP NO. PROPERTY OWNER AMOUNT 72.02-1-8.1 Marshall, B. R. and Linda R. $ 600.29 72.02-1-8.2 Marshall, B. R. and Linda R. $ 50.00 72.02-1-8.4 Marshall, Anthony T. and Sharon $ 563.33 72.02-1-16 Thomas, Inc. $1788.23 72.02-1-45 Thomas, Inc. $ 18.89 2. That the consideration for each easement acquisition shall not exceed a value equal to 40% of the current tax assessment for the property to be acquired plus the cost of actual damages, if any; and 3. That the consideration for each easement shall be paid from the Campbell Hills Water Line Account; and 4. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish these acquisitions, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Church to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None IN RE: APPOINTMENTS 1. Hanging Rock Battlefield and Rail Preservation Foundation Supervisor Nickens nominated Pete Haislip to serve a three year term which will expire on October 25, 2003. 2. Industrial Development Authority Supervisor McNamara asked the Deputy Clerk to determine if Mr. J. Richard Cranwell would be interested in serving another term IN RE: CONSENT AGENDA R-092600-5; R-092600-5.a; R-092600-5.b; R-092600-5.g Supervisor McNamara moved to adopt the Consent Resolution. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None RESOLUTION 092600-5 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN September 26, 2000 COUNTY APPOINTEE RESOLUTION of the Board of Supervisors for the County of Roanoke, establishing, by joint action of the Boards of Supervisors of the Counties of Alleghany, Bath, Botetourt, Craig, Roanoke and Rockbridge, and the City Councils of the Cities of Buena Vista, Clifton Forge, Covington, Lexington, Roanoke and Salem, the membership of the Court-Community Corrections Regional Community Criminal Justice Board to serve the region composed of those Counties and Cities. WHEREAS, Boards. of Supervisors of the Counties of Alleghany, Bath, Botetourt, Craig, Roanoke and Rockbridge, and the City Councils of the Cities of Buena Vista, Clifton Forge, Covington, Lexington, Roanoke and Salem have established and operate the Court-Community Corrections Program, a local pretrial services and community-based probation program established and operated pursuant to the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 5 of Title 53.1 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and WHEREAS, the Virginia Comprehensive Community-Corrections Act for Local-Responsible Offenders (Virginia Code § 53.1-180 et seq.) and the Virginia Pretrial Services Act (Virginia Code §19.2-152.2 et seq.) require the establishment and appointment of a Community Criminal Justice Board for the Court-Community Corrections Program; and WHEREAS, a Regional Community Criminal Justice Board for the Court- 1 Community Corrections Program previously has been established in accordance with i law, and this Board of Supervisors now, and in conjunction with the governing bodies of ' the other jurisdictions which participate in this multijurisdictional program, deems it appropriate to reconstitute the Regional Community Criminal Justice Board for the Court-Community Corrections Program, pursuant to the authority granted to local governing bodies under Virginia Code §15.2-1411 and in consideration of the changes in the Code of Virginia since the Regional Community Criminal Justice Board's establishment; NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the authority granted to this Board by Virginia Code §§15.2-1411, 19.2-152.5, 53.1-183 and the organic law of the Commonwealth, IT IS RESOLVED: 1. That a Regional Community Criminal Justice Board for the Court- Community Corrections Program is established. 2. The Counties of Alleghany, Bath, Botetourt, Craig, Roanoke and Rockbridge, and the City Councils- of the Cities of Buena Vista, Clifton Forge, Covington, Lexington, Roanoke and Salem are the jurisdictions which participate in the Court-Community Corrections Program. Each of these jurisdictions shall be represented on the Regional Community Criminal Justice Board. The Regional Community Criminal Justice Board shall consist of 25 persons, a number established by this resolution and by similar resolutions of the governing bodies of each of the other participating jurisdictions. The composition of the Regional Community Justice Board shall at all times comply with all applicable statutes and regulations. Each participating city or county shall have an equal number of appointments. . 3. In conjunction with resolutions of appointment adopted or to be adopted by the governing bodies of all participating jurisdictions, this Board of Supervisors appoints the following persons to the Regional Criminal Justice Board for the terms of .years set forth below. Each appointment shall be effective as of July 1, 2000. Because §53.1- September 26, 2000 563 Dr. David Smith Superintendent Bath County Public Schools 1 Year Ms. Gail Burrus 2 Years Director, Counseling Services Blue Ridge Community Services Board Roanoke, Virginia 4. This Board, in conjunction with the governing bodies of the other jurisdictions which have established the Court-Community Corrections Program, hereby reappoints the City of Salem as the fiscal agent for the program. On motion of Supervisor McNamara to adopt the resolution and appoint John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant Administrator, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None RESOLUTION 092600-5.b REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF NORTHWALK DRIVE AND THE REMAINING PORTION OF PETTIT AVENUE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM WHEREAS, the streets described on the attached Additions Form SR- 5(a), fully incorporated herein by reference, are shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, and WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised this Board the streets meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street Reguirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation, and WHEREAS, the County and the Virginia Department of Transportation have entered into an agreement on March 9, 1999, for comprehensive stormwater detention which applies to this request for addition, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(A) to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote Moved By: Supervisor McNamara Seconded By: None Required Yeas: Supervisors Johnson Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara Nays: None Absent: None RESOLUTION 092600-5.g AUTHORIZING THE BORROWING OF September 26, 2000 565 easements already established. Chairman McNamara responded that this matter will be discussed in a Closed Meeting with legal counsel and that Mr. Mahoney will have an update at the evening session. IN RE: REPORTS Supervisor Johnson moved to receive and file the following reports. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Ca~itai Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Future School Capital Reserve 5. Accounts Paid -August 2000 6. Statement of Revenues and Expenditures for two month ,period ended August 31, 2000 7. Update on CORTRAN contract. IN RE: CLOSED MEETING At 4:07 p.m., Supervisor McNamara moved to go into Closed Meeting after the work session pursuant to Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344A (7) consultation with legal counsel pertaining to probable litigation Re: Va Gas Pipeline. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara September 26, 2000 567 Mayor Donald Davis called the Vinton Town Council to order at 5:04 p.m. Members present were: Robert Altice, Bradley Grose; Tom Rotenberry; and William Obenchain. Staff present was Vinton Town Manager Clay Goodman, Town Attorney Bill Heartwell, and Town Clerk Carolyn Ross. Supervisor Nickens gave the invocation and Chairman McNamara declared a recess for dinner at 5:10 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 5:30 p.m., and it was agreed to add the proposed Fire & Rescue Comprehensive Plan to the agenda. Mayor Davis introduced the new Vinton Chief of Police Herb Cooley. IN RE: MCDONALD FARM COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS Mr. Goodman distributed a copy of the map approved by the Board of Supervisors which shows the zoning and proposed land uses for the McDonald Farm which is a joint project between the County and Town of Vinton. The 100 acre parcel of land was purchased by the Town of Vinton in 1985, and he described the history of the project and plans for development. Mr. Hodge advised that an agreement with the Town of Vinton on McDonald Farm should be completed and brought back to the Board by October 24, 2000, along with possibilities for funding the County's share of the project. IN RE: FIRE & RESCUE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Chief Burch gave an over-view of the proposed Fire & Rescue Comprehensive Plan which was .presented earlier at the work session. Mr. Hodge advised that staff will be communicating the details of the plan to the other localities and that funding methods will be brought back at the October 24, 2000 meeting. Mayor Davis invited Chief Burch to attend the next Vinton Town Council meeting on October 2, September 26, 2000 Mr. Mahoney advised that this is a request for approval of a resolution to authorize execution of an agreement to relocate the boundary line between Montgomery County and Roanoke County. This proposal has been worked on for several years and started with a requests from the Hesleps to move their entire trailer park into Montgomery County. As the situation was discussed, a broader adjustment of the boundary line was considered to adjust some of the more critical issues. The corporate boundary line between Montgomery County and Roanoke County would be adjusted as follows: (1) the property of Arthur W. Heslep containing 3.720 acres, and (b) the property of Richard A. Heslep containing 1.960 acres would be added to Montgomery County; and, (c) the property of Thomas, Ltd. containing 36.726 acres and (d) the property of Thomas, Ltd. containing 0.882 acres would be added to Roanoke County. He advised that Ed Natt, Attorney, was present and represents both Mr. Heslep and Mr. Thomas. With the Board's approval, the agreement could be executed and documents filed for Circuit Court approval, and the adjustment would take effect January 1, 2001. He also requested that the Board refer this matter to the Planning Commission with a recommendation to have this new property zoned AG-1. In response to Supervisor Nickens, Mr. Mahoney advised that staff is seeking approval of this boundary adjustment because agreement has been reached by both jurisdictions and the property owners support the changes. In response to Supervisor Johnson's concerns about notification of the change for persons living on the property, Mr. Natt advised that the property coming into Roanoke County is mostly vacant land, and the property going into Montgomery County has residents of the trailer park. Mr. Roger Heslep advised that even though the trailer park has been physically located in Roanoke County, the residents have been treated as citizens of Montgomery County in all instances of schools, voting, and taxes. September 26, 2000 571 be required by law to effect the change in the boundary line as set forth herein. 7. The Clerk to the Board of Supervisors is directed to forward an attested copy of this resolution to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Montgomery County. On motion of Supervisor Church to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None IN RE: PUBLIC HEARINGS AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Second reading of ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit to allow the expansion of a fast food restaurant with drive thru located at 4840 Hollins Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of David J. Bell. (Terry Harrington, County Planned 0-092600-7 Mr. Harrington advised that this is the petition for a special use permit on a parcel of land approximately 6.7 acres in area and zoned C-2 General Commercial for the operation of adrive-through facility in an established fast food restaurant. The lot is located in the shopping center on the northeast corner of the intersection of Plantation Road and Hollins Road. The Planning Commission recommended approval with two conditions. There was no discussion and no citizens present to speak on this item. Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None ORDINANCE 092600-7 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO DAVID J. BELL TO ALLOW THE EXPANSION OF A FAST FOOD RESTAURANT WITH DRIVE-THRU TO BE LOCATED AT 4840 HOLLINS ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 38.16-1-3.3), HOLLINS MAGISTERI- AL DISTRICT WHEREAS, David J. Bell has filed a petition for a special use permit to September 26, 2000 573 Commission recommended approval with six conditions. In response to Supervisor Nickens, Mr. Harrington advised that the current tower is over 200 feet, has a FAA light, and the proposed tower will probably also have a light. There were no citizens present to speak on this item. Supervisor McNamara moved to adopt the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None ORDINANCE 092600-8 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO PAXSON COMMUNICATIONS TO REPLACE AN EXISTING TOWER WITH A NEW 199 FOOT BROADCASTING TOWER TO BE LOCATED AT 8241 HONEYSUCKLE ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 93.00-1-47.1), WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Paxson Communications has filed a petition for a specia( use permit to replace an existing tower with a new 199 foot broadcasting tower to be located at 8241 Honeysuckle Road (Tax Map No. 93.00-1-47.1) in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on September 5, 2000; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on August 22, 2000; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on September 26, 2000. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Paxson Communications to replace an existing tower with a new 199 foot broadcasting tower to be located at 8241 Honeysuckle Road (Tax Map No. 93.00-1-47.1) in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District is substantially m accord with the adopted 2000 Community Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.2-2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved with the following conditions: (1) The height of the proposed lattice tower shall not exceed 199 feet above grade. (2) The lattice tower structure and all attached hardware shall be a flat matted color so as to reduce visibility and light reflection. (3) No lighting shall be installed on the tower structure unless required by the FAA. Security fighting may be provided on site, at a height not to exceed 25 feet. (4) If the use of the tower structure for wireless communications and broadcasting is discontinued, the tower structure shall be September 26, 2000 55), CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Grace Assembly of God has filed a petition for a special use permit to construct a church to be located at 5530 Catawba Valley Drive (Tax Map No. 7.00-2-55) in the Catawba Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on September 5, 2000; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on August 22, 2000; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on September 26, 2000. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Grace Assembly of God to construct a church to be located at 5530 Catawba Valley Drive (Tax Map No. 7.00-2-55) in the Catawba Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 2000 Community Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.2- 2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved. 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Church to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None 4. Second reading of ordinance to amend Section 30-91-2 (A) 1. of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance pertaining to the parking and storage of recreational vehicles in front yards in residential districts, upon the petition of the Roanoke County Planning Commission (Terry Harrington, County Planner) DENIED; 0-092600-10 Mr. Harrington advised that at the request of the Board, the Roanoke County Planning Commission prepared an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to allow the parking of recreational vehicles in the front yards of corner lots. He advised that the County has historically prohibited the parking or storage of trailers and recreational September 26, 2000 5'~'~ AYES: Supervisor McNamara NAYS: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens DENIAL OF ORDINANCE 092600-10 AMENDING AND REENACTING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE VIRGINIA BY THE MODIFICATION OF STANDARDS FOR THE STORAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS. WHEREAS, in 1992 the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors adopted a new zoning ordinance for Roanoke County ,including provisions pertaining to the parking of vehicles in residential districts; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors has requested the Roanoke County Planning Commission to prepare an amendment to the zoning ordinance addressing the allowable storage of recreational vehicles in residential districts; and, WHEREAS, public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice support an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance of the County of Roanoke to provide for the storage of recreational vehicles in the street-side side yard of corner lots in residential districts; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this amendment on September 5, 2000; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended denial of this amendment to the Zoning Ordinance of the County of Roanoke. WHEREAS, public notice and advertisement of this amendment has been provided as required by Section 15.2-2204 of the Code of Virginia, and the Roanoke County Code. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: On motion of Supervisor McNamara to adopt the ordinance, and motion failed by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisor McNamara NAYS: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens IN RE: CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS Annie Krochalis 9428 Patterson Drive, spoke of her concerns about the lack of Fire & Rescue staff; the Fire & Rescue quadrant plan presented earlier and its detrimental impact on volunteers Chairman McNamara advised that the plan and funding methods are being reviewed; that County staff will meet with the fire and rescue chiefs and staff from the other localities; and that a public hearing will be held on October 24, 2000 at 7:00 September 26, 2000 ~'~(~ and Chestnut Mountain Road, and that another public hearing on roads will be held on October 5`f'. (2) He asked that the staff pursue his suggestion of providing radar guns for citizens to enforce speeding such as Town of Blacksburg recently did. (3) He respectfully disagreed with Supervisor Church and said that the County does a good job of keeping its citizens informed and suggested that instead of relying on the media to inform, the County could place advertisements in papers. Supervisor McNamara: (1) He advised that the joint meeting with the Vinton Town Council held earlier was very successful, and they discussed the McDonald Farm economic development project. (2) He advised that the County has invited elected local government officials and families to attend a picnic on October 7, 2000 at the Explore Park. (3) He advised that the County is willing to keep working to find a way to minimize the impact of the Virginia Gas Pipeline on its citizens. IN RE: CLOSED MEETING At 8:12 p.m., Supervisor McNamara announced that since the Closed Meeting was not held during the afternoon session, the Board would now go into Closed Meeting pursuant to Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (7) consultation with legal counsel pertaining to probable litigation Re: Virginia Gas Pipeline. IN RE: CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION R-092600-11 At 8:32 p.m., Supervisor McNamara moved to return to open session and adopt the Certification Resolution. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None October 10, 2000 Cep ~ .. . Roanoke County Administration Center 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 October 10, 2000 The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the second Tuesday of the month and a joint meeting with the Roanoke City Council. IN RE: WELCOME Chairman McNamara welcomed the members of Roanoke City Council and staff. Roanoke City Mayor Ralph Smith responded that he was honored to attend his first joint meeting with the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. IN RE: INVOCATION The invocation was given by H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix, member of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. Lunch followed. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman McNamara and Mayor Smith called the meeting to order at 12:25 p.m. The roll call was taken for the Board of Supervisors and City Council. October 10, 2000 ~~~ Regional Airport Commission for attending the meeting. Commission Chairman Arthur Whittaker expressed appreciation to the Board members and City Council for inviting them to attend. He advised that the Airport Commission members would not be participating in the meeting at advice of Counsel because this was not an advertised official meeting for the Airport Commission. IN RE: DISCUSSION ITEMS 1_ Progress report on operations at the Roanoke Regional Airport. (Jacqueline Shuck, Executive Director) Ms. Shuck reported that profits are up because of the economy but there has been an increase in congestion. The airlines have raised fares five times this year. She also announced that recent legislation released the aviation trust fund of $3.2 billion, and federal funds for the airport will increase from $1.6 million to $3.2 million for the three years the program will be in effect. Ms. Shuck presented several reports and reviewed each of them. They included (1) A list of ten capital projects planned for the airport with construction on some of the projects already begun and others to begin between now and 2002; (2) An air service update as of September 2000 showing a total number of daily flights of 47 and daily seats of 2,161; with 10 destinations served non-stop and 5 destinations served direct; (3) A news release announcing the 38`h consecutive month that passenger traffic has increased at the airport; (4) A passenger profile from January 1993 to March 2000 showing that 55.10% travel for business and 36.50% travel for pleasure; (5) A report on the air market averages for 1999; (6) A chart showing the1996 - 2000 Enplaned Load Factor; (7) October 10, 2000 5g5 Roanoke County Administration Center 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 October 10, 2000 The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the second Tuesday and the first regularly scheduled meeting of the month of October, 2000. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman McNamara called the meeting to order at 3:01 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Joseph McNamara, Vice Chairman H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix, Supervisors Joseph B. "Butch" Church, Bob L. Johnson (Arrived 3:20 p.m.), Harry C. Nickens MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney; Mary H. Allen, Clerk to the Board; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator; Dan R. O'Donnell, Assistant County Administrator IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES The invocation was given by The Reverend Phillip Whitaker, Brambleton Baptist Church. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited by all present. IN RE: PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Proclamation declaring October 22-31, 2000 as Red Ribbon Week in the County of Roanoke October 10, 2000 5 g 7 rates, reportable diseases, air quality, housing units, and river/creek water quality. IN RE: NEW BUSINESS 1. Request to approve a construction contract and advance funds for the New South County High School. (Dr. Linda Weber, School Superintendent and Diane Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer) R-101000-1 Ms. Hyatt reported that the School Board has awarded the construction contract for the new South County High School to GMT Industries for $19,094,000 which includes the auxiliary gymnasium and four additional classrooms. The contract is within the construction budget. Proceeds from the state literary loan fund and the Virginia Public School Authority Fund will be used to finance the project. The School Board is requesting an advance of $9,500,000 at this time for construction costs needed between now and May 2001 when the VPSA bonds are issued. Ms. Hyatt asked for approval of the resolution which authorizes an advance of $9,500,000 from the County for construction of the new South County High School and approval of the construction contract of $19,094,000. School Board member Mike Stovall, School Superintendent Linda Weber and Richard Flora, Executive Assistant for Operations, were present to answer questions. Mr. Flora reported that they first opened bids a month ago, when they requested multiple bids and planned to use a project management approach. When the bids were opened, they were $2.1 million over budget. The Schools decided to go back out for a single bid and without a project management company overseeing the project. The second bids were all on budget without using the $500,000 contingency. The October 10, 2000 589 project management for the new south county high school, for a total advance of $1,850,092, on June 13, 2000, and WHEREAS, the County Board approved an advance of $1,850,092 for the new south county high school and an advance of $673,951 for Glenvar Middle School on June 13, 2000, and WHEREAS, the School Board is now requesting approval to award the construction contract for the new south county high school for $19,094,000 and requires an advance in the amount of $9,500,000. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the County Board authorizes the School Board to enter into a construction contract for $19,094,000 and advances the sum of $9,500,000 for construction of the new south county high school. On motion of Supervisor McNamara to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None IN RE: FIRST READINGS OF ORDINANCES 1. First reading of an ordinance amending and reenacting Section 21-3. "Utility Service Tax" of Article I. "In General" of Chapter 21, "Taxation" of the Roanoke County Code to conform to the requirements of Virginia Statutes deregulating electrical and natural aas industries. (Joseph Obenshain. Senior Assistant County Attorney) Mr. Obenshain reported that the General Assembly passed legislation deregulating the gas and electric industries in the state effective January 1, 2001. As a result, localities are required to amend their consumer utility tax and utility license tax ordinances before October 31, 2000, to allow a sixty day notice to be given to electric and gas companies. The legislation will give consumers the option of purchasing their gas or electricity service from a choice of different providers which may be located outside of Virginia. Federal law prohibits local governments from requiring out-of-state companies to collect the taxes imposed upon residents and businesses in their present form, and the tax basis must be changed from a percentage of the dollar amount paid October 10, 2000 591 1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for October 10, 2000 designated as Item I -Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items through 5, inclusive, as follows: 1. Confirmation of appointment to the Hanging Rock Battlefield and Rail Preservation Foundation. 2. Designation of a voting representative at the Virginia Association of Counties (VACo) Annual Meeting. 3. Request for acceptance and appropriation of $16,111 from the Department of Education for alternative student education. 4, Donation of a new 20' drainage easement and waterline easement and a new 20' waterline easement on property of Boone, Boone & Loeb, Inc., Fairway Forest Villas, in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. 5. Endorsement of Supervisor Harry C. Nickens to serve another term as Region Nine Representative on the Virginia Association of Counties Board of Directors. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the Consent Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None RESOLUTION 101000-2.e ENDORSING SUPERVISOR HARRY C. NICKENS TO SERVE ANOTHER TERM AS REGION NINE REPRESENTATIVE ON VIRGINIA ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES BOARD OF DIRECTORS WHEREAS, Supervisor Harry C. Nickens is currently serving a two year term as Region Nine Representative on the Virginia Association of Counties Board of Directors; and WHEREAS, Supervisor Nickens has advised that he desires to continue serving as Region Nine Representative for another two year term which will begin January 1, 2001, and end on December 31, 2002; and WHEREAS, Supervisor Nickens has requested an endorsement from each of the governing bodies in Region Nine which includes Bedford County, Botetourt County, Craig County, Giles County and Roanoke County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, does hereby endorse Harry C. Nickens to serve another two year term as Region Nine representative on the VACo Board of Directors; and FURTHER, the Clerk to the Board is directed to forward a copy of this resolution to each of the governing bodies in Region Nine, and James D. Campbell, Executive Director of VACo. October 10, 2000 593 AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Future School Capital Reserve 5. Quarterly Report on Day Reporting Program 6. Update on renovations to the Salem Office Supply building Supervisor Johnson asked for a cost breakdown after the construction bids are received. Supervisor Nickens advised that he had no interest in going beyond the original scope and plans. Supervisor Minnix asked Mr. Hodge or Mr. Mahoney if additional funds are provided with the appointment of an additional judge. Mr. Hodge advised that any additional funds would cover office support only. 7. Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investment and Portfolio Policy as of September 30, 2000. IN RE: REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS Supervisor Johnson: (1) He apologized for being late to the meeting. (2) He noted that his father was deaf and would have enjoyed the closed captioning of the meeting, and that he was proud that we are now providing the service. (3) He advised that he tried to attend the Explore Park picnic but took his grandchildren instead to the Police Department Open House, and commended the department on the activity. Supervisor Minnix: (1) He explained that he did not attend the Explore Park picnic either because he had to work. (2) He reminded the residents on Penn Forest Blvd. that NO PARKING signs will be installed soon, but he is trying to determine October 10, 2000 5(~,~ IN RE: WORK SESSIONS (4TH FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM) 1. Work Session to discuss amendments to the Community Plan for the Hollins/Interstate 81 Exit 146 interchange area. (Janet Scheid. Senior Planner) The work session was held from 4:40 p.m. until 5:05 p.m. Ms. Scheid explained that the changes to the community plan and development and land use guidelines are to encourage future economic development but that there is no change in the zoning at this time. She reported that as a result of the increasing traffic along the Interstate 81 corridor, VDOT has proposed improving the interstate. One of these proposed improvements calls for the enlargement and relocation of the Hollins interchange, Exit 146. The interchange study has been conducted to analyze the potential impacts and opportunities that the road improvements provide on the current land uses. Another objective is to determine suitable land uses within the project area which can promote economic opportunities while limiting the haphazard development of land in ways that are not consistent with the overall objectives of the interchange district. The current uses within the project area range from agricultural to residential to industrial. As this transition continues to progress with the widening of I-81 and the re-design of the interchange, it is important that the County Land Use Maps and Community Plan provide current property owners, and particularly residential owners, with the ability to adapt to changing uses and property values. Ms. Scheid reported that the following Design and Land Use Guidelines were recommended to ensure that the development of the Hollins/I-81 Interchange District conforms with the overall objectives. Plantation Road will continue to serve as an important gateway into Roanoke County and it is extremely important that the October 10, 2000 X47 Architectural Guidelines Exterior building materials are encouraged to be of high quality, attractive in appearance, durable and easily maintained for the life of the structure. Brick, stone or masonry construction is preferred for all structures but particularly for those buildings fronting or visible from the public street. Metal exterior construction materials should only be used on the sides of buildings not visible from the public street. For properties zoned commercial, roof pitches of no less than a 4/12 pitch are encouraged on both primary structures and accessory structures. Flat roofs are not encouraged on commercial properties. Roof materials should be nonreflective. Architectural design should be sensitive to form, texture, color and massing of buildings, with particular emphasis paid to articulating entrances and to minimizing bulk. Bright primary colors for exterior materials, including trim, are discouraged. Land Use Guidelines It is the intention of Roanoke County to encourage the development and re-development of this interchange district in an orderly manner that is consistent with the stated objectives. This will ensure development that protects the environment and aesthetics of the area while protecting against development that is likely to cause or create a hazard or nuisance to adjacent properties. The development and re-development of property within this interchange district should only be conducted when proper and safe vehicular access is provided taking into consideration sight distance, turning movements, acceleration and deceleration lanes and speed of traffic. It is the intention of Roanoke County to provide technical andlor financial incentives to property owners within this Interchange District, through public/private partnerships where appropriate, to encourage the development and re-development of property within the guidelines stated herein. It is the objective of Roanoke County to encourage the development and re-development of those properties that are best situated for industrial and commercial development based on location, road access, topography and other physical attributes. In addition, it is the objective of Roanoke County to preserve and protect, where appropriate, existing residential properties and those properties best suited for no development or for very low intensity development due to their special natural features. 2. Work Session on year-end operations. (Brent Robertson Budget Director The work session was held from 5:07 p.m. until 5:50 p.m. October 10, 2000 X44 Submitted by, Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board Approved by, Joseph McNamara Chairman • October 10, 2000 ~n ~ Roanoke County Administration Center 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 October 10, 2000 The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Montgomery County Courthouse, Christiansburg,virginia, this being an adjourned meeting from the regular meeting on the second Tuesday of the month and a joint meeting with the Montgomery County Board of Supervisors who were already meeting in open session. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Vice Chairman Minnix called the Board of Supervisors to order at 7:15 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Vice Chairman H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix, Supervisors Joseph B. "Butch" Church, Bob L. Johnson, Harry C. Nickens MEMBERS ABSENT: Chairman Joseph McNamara STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney; Dan O'Donnell, Assistant County Administrator MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: Chair Mary W. Biggs, Vice Chair Larry N. Rush, Supervisors John A. Muffo, Annette S. Perkins, James D. Politis, C. P Shorter, Joe C. Stewart October 10, 2000 ~in~ WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened a closed meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such closed meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the closed meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the closed meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Certification Resolution; and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor McNamara IN RE: ACTION TO FILE A MOTION WITH THE STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION CONCERNING THE PROPOSED VIRGINIA GAS PIPELINE Supervisor Church offered the following motion: BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby authorizes the County Attorney to file a Motion with the State Corporation Commission supporting and urging the State Corporation Commission to grant the Motion requesting the State Corporation Commission to reconsider and reopen the certification process for the Virginia Gas Pipeline (Case No. PUE 990167) proposed to go through Montgomery and Roanoke Counties that was filed by certain citizens residing in the Counties of Montgomery and Roanoke for the following reasons: ACTION NO. A-111400-3 . a ITEM NUMBER ~'-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 14, 2000 AGENDA ITEM: Confirmation of Committee appointment to the Industrial Development Authority COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY At the October 24, 2000 meeting, Supervisor McNamara nominated Linwood P. Windley, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, to serve a four year term which will expire September 26, 2004. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the above appointment be confirmed by the Board of Supervisors. Submitted by: ~C~...~ Mary H. Allen CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Approved by, C~~~ ~~b~ /" Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Church _ x Johnson _ x McNamara- x Minnix _ x Nickens _ x _ Motion by: Joseph McNamara to approve cc: File Industrial Development Authority File 1 a AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2000 RESOLUTION 111400-3.b EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY UPON THE RETIREMENT OF RICKY L. ETTER, SHERIFF'S OFFICE WHEREAS, Ricky L. Etter was employed by Roanoke County on September 1, 1977 as a Deputy Sheriff in the Sheriff's Office; and WHEREAS, Deputy Etter retired from Roanoke County on August 1, 2000 as the Chief Classification Deputy in the Sheriff's Office after more than twenty-two years of service; and WHEREAS, Deputy Etter has served with professionalism and integrity; and through his employment with Roanoke County, has been instrumental in improving the quality of life for its citizens by administering rehabilitation programs which enable inmates of the Roanoke County/Salem Jail to return to the community as productive citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to RICKY L. ETTER for more than twenty-two years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke County; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors does express its 1 ~ + i best wishes for a happy, restful, and productive retirement. On motion of Supervisor McNamara to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~• Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: Resolutions of Appreciation File Sheriff Gerald Holt Joe Sgroi, Director, Human Resources 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2000 RESOLUTION 111400-3.c EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY UPON THE RETIREMENT OF MARTHA A. GLADDEN, SOCIAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT WHEREAS, Martha A. Gladden was first employed by Roanoke County on December 1, 1980 as a Clerk Typist in the Social Services Department; and WHEREAS, Ms. Gladden retired from Roanoke County on October 1, 2000 as a Social Services Aide I in the Social Services Department after more than nineteen years of service; and WHEREAS, Ms. Gladden, through her employment with Roanoke County, has been instrumental in improving the quality of life for its citizens, by always displaying a genuinely positive attitude towards not only her job responsibilities but to the ever- changing Social Services environment; investing in the team concept; and consistently demonstrating a willingness to help others in her department and community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to MARTHA A. GLADDEN for more than nineteen years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke County; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy, restful, and productive retirement. On motion of Supervisor McNamara to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~~ Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: Resolutions of Appreciation File Dr. Betty McCrary, Director, Social Services Joe Sgroi, Director, Human Resources AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2000 RESOLUTION 111400-3.d EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY UPON THE RETIREMENT OF JEFFREY M. SWORTZEL, POLICE DEPARTMENT WHEREAS, Jeffrey M. Swortzel was first employed by Roanoke County on September 16, 1981 as a Deputy Sheriff in the Sheriff's Office; and has served as Deputy Sheriff Corporal; and Deputy Sheriff Sergeant, before transferring to the Police Department as a Police Officer; and WHEREAS, Sgt. Swortzel retired from Roanoke County on October 1, 2000 as a Police Officer Sergeant after more than nineteen years of service; and WHEREAS, Sgt. Swortzel was assigned to the first accreditation team for the Police Department and was instrumental in receiving the first accreditation in 1992; and WHEREAS, Sgt. Swortzel has been assigned to the School Services Unit for the past five years; was responsible for implementing many of the successful School-Police programs in place today; and worked very hard with the students to make the programs effective; and WHEREAS, Sgt. Swortzel, through his employment with Roanoke County, has been instrumental in improving the quality of life for its citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke 1 l County expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to JEFFREY M. SWORTZEL for more than nineteen years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke County; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy, restful, and productive retirement. On motion of Supervisor McNamara to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: Resolutions of Appreciation File Chief of Police Ray Lavinder Joe Sgroi, Director, Human Resources 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2000 RESOLUTION 111400-3.e1 EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY UPON THE RETIREMENT OF ROGER F. ROBINSON, POLICE DEPARTMENT WHEREAS, Roger F. Robinson was first employed by Roanoke County on July 1, 1973 as a Deputy Sheriff in the Sheriff's Office; and has served as Deputy Sheriff Corporal; and Deputy Sheriff Sergeant, before transferring to the Police Department; and WHEREAS, Sgt. Robinson retired from Roanoke County on October 1, 2000 as a Police Officer Sergeant after more than twenty-six years of service; and WHEREAS, Sgt. Robinson was the first Public Information Officer in the Sheriffs Office and served in that capacity for approximately two years; and WHEREAS, Sgt. Robinson spent his last eight years assigned to the Criminal Investigations Division, daily managing the activities of the detectives, and was noted for his ability to relate to citizens and reduce their concerns in very stressful situations; and WHEREAS, Sgt. Robinson, through his employment with Roanoke County, has been instrumental in improving the quality of life for its citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to ROGER F. ROBINSON for more than twenty-six years of capable, loyal and 1 dedicated service to Roanoke County; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy, restful, and productive retirement. On motion of Supervisor McNamara to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: Resolutions of Appreciation File Police Chief Ray Lavinder Joe Sgroi, Director, Human Resources 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2000 RESOLUTION 111400-3.f: EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY UPON THE RETIREMENT OF EDWARD A. SHOTWELL, POLICE DEPARTMENT WHEREAS, Edward A. Shotwell was first employed by Roanoke County on September 1, 1980 in as a Deputy Sheriff -Uniform Division in the Sheriff's Office; and also served as Deputy Sheriff Sergeant -Corrections before transferring to the Police Department; and WHEREAS, Officer Shotwell retired from Roanoke County on August 1, 2000 as a Police Officer -Uniform Division after more than twenty years of service; and WHEREAS, Officer Shotwell, prior to working for Roanoke County, had a distinguished career in the United States Army serving as a Noncommissioned Officer; and WHEREAS, Officer Shotwell's favorite duty was patrol; and he was well known and respected as a patrol officer in the Glenvar and Bradshaw areas of the County; and WHEREAS, Officer Shotwell possessed an extra-ordinary ability to work with people regardless of their situation as victim or offender; and WHEREAS, Officer Shotwell, through his employment with Roanoke County, has been instrumental in improving the quality of life for its citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke 1 County expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to EDWARD A. SHOTWELL for more than twenty years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke County; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy, restful, and productive retirement. On motion of Supervisor McNamara to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~• Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: Resolutions of Appreciation File Police Chief Ray Lavinder Joe Sgroi, Director, Human Resources 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2000 RESOLUTION 111400-3.g EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY UPON THE RETIREMENT OF LINDA S. HOGAN, POLICE DEPARTMENT WHEREAS, Linda S. Hogan was first employed by Roanoke County on July 1, 1971 as a dispatcher; and has also served as Lead PBX Operator and Lead Dispatcher; and WHEREAS, Ms. Hogan retired from Roanoke County on August 1, 2000, as the Chief Communications Officer with the Police Department after more than twenty-nine years of service; and WHEREAS, Ms. Hogan, as manager of the communications section, was an advocate for the communications personnel, and was respected and held in high esteem by her co-workers; and WHEREAS, as the result of Ms. Hogan's efforts, working conditions in the 911 Center improved greatly under her management; and WHEREAS, Ms. Hogan had an excellent rapport with County residents and was able to assist them in many life threatening situations, saving countless lives, and was instrumental in improving the quality of life for all citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke 1 County expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to LINDA S. HOGAN for more than twenty-nine years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke County; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy, restful, and productive retirement. On motion of Supervisor McNamara to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: Resolutions of Appreciation File Police Chief Ray Lavinder Joe Sgroi, Director, Human Resources 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER-~~°` -''~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 14, 2000 AGENDA ITEM: Request for approval of resolutions of appreciation upon the retirements of (a) Ricky L. Etter, Sheriff's Office; (b) Martha A. Gladden, Social Service Department; and from the Police Department: (c) Jeffrey M. Swortzel; (d) Roger F. Robinson; (e) Edward A. Shotwell; and (f) Linda S. Hogan COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Human Resources Department has notified us that the following employees have retired and requested that their resolution of appreciation be mailed to them. (a) Ricky L. Etter, Sheriff's Office, retired August 1, 2000, (b) Martha A. Gladden, Social Services Department, retired October 1, 2000 (d) Jeffrey M. Swortzel, Police Department, retired October 1, 2000 (d) Roger F. Robinson, Police Department, retired October 1, 2000 (e) Edward. A. Shotwell, Police Department, retired August 1, 2000 (f) Linda S. Hogan, Police Department, retired August 1, 2000 It is recommended that the Board approve the attached resolutions and direct the Deputy Clerk to mail them to the retirees with the appreciation of the Board members for their many years of service to the County. Respectfully submitted, Brenda J. olton, CMC Deputy Clerk Approved by, ~~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ,+ ~~ ~ ~~" ~ ) ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved () Motion by: Church _ _ _ Denied () Johnson _ _ Received () McNamara- Referred () Minnix To () Nickens _ _ _ ~~ ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2000 RESOLUTION EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY UPON THE RETIREMENT OF RICKY L. ETTER, SHERIFF'S OFFICE WHEREAS, Ricky L. Etter was employed by Roanoke County on September 1, 1977 as a Deputy Sheriff in the Sheriff's Office; and WHEREAS, Deputy Etter retired from Roanoke County on August 1, 2000 as the Chief Classification Deputy in the Sheriff's Office after more than twenty-two years of service; and WHEREAS, Deputy Etter has served with professionalism and integrity; and through his employment with Roanoke County, has been instrumental in improving the quality of life for its citizens by administering rehabilitation programs which enable inmates of the Roanoke County/Salem Jail to return to the community as productive citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to RICKY L. ETTER for more than twenty-two years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke County; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy, restful, and productive retirement. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2000 RESOLUTION EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY UPON THE RETIREMENT OF MARTHA A. GLADDEN, SOCIAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT WHEREAS, Martha A. Gladden was first employed by Roanoke County on December 1, 1980 as a Clerk Typist in the Social Services Department; and WHEREAS, Ms. Gladden retired from Roanoke County on October 1, 2000 as a Social Services Aide I in the Social Services Department after more than nineteen years of service; and WHEREAS, Ms. Gladden, through her employment with Roanoke County, has been instrumental in improving the quality of life for its citizens, by always displaying a genuinely positive attitude towards not only her job responsibilities but to the ever- changing Social Services environment; investing in the team concept; and consistently demonstrating a willingness to help others in her department and community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to MARTHA A. GLADDEN for more than nineteen years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke County; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy, restful, and productive retirement. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2000 RESOLUTION EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY UPON THE RETIREMENT OF JEFFREY M. SWORTZEL, POLICE DEPARTMENT WHEREAS, Jeffrey M. Swortzel was first employed by Roanoke County on September 16, 1981 as a Deputy Sheriff in the Sheriff's Office; and has served as Deputy Sheriff Corporal; and Deputy Sheriff Sergeant, before transferring to the Police Department as a Police Officer; and WHEREAS, Sgt. Swortzel retired from Roanoke County on October 1, 2000 as a Police Officer Sergeant after more than nineteen years of service; and WHEREAS, Sgt. Swortzel was assigned to the first accreditation team for the Police Department and was instrumental in receiving the first accreditation in 1992; and WHEREAS, Sgt. Swortzel has been assigned to the School Services Unit for the past five years; was responsible for implementing many of the successful School-Police programs in place today; and worked very hard with the students to make the programs effective; and WHEREAS, Sgt. Swortzel, through his employmentwith Roanoke County, has been instrumental in improving the quality of life for its citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke 1 J C. County to JEFFREY M. SWORTZEL for more than nineteen years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke County; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy, restful, and productive retirement. 2 ,~" 3 J AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2000 RESOLUTION EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY UPON THE RETIREMENT OF ROGER F. ROBINSON, POLICE DEPARTMENT WHEREAS, Roger F. Robinson was first employed by Roanoke County on July 1, 1973 as a Deputy Sheriff in the Sheriff's Office; and has served as Deputy Sheriff Corporal; and Deputy Sheriff Sergeant, before transferring to the Police Department; and WHEREAS, Sgt. Robinson retired from Roanoke County on October 1, 2000 as a Police Officer Sergeant after more than twenty-six years of service; and WHEREAS, Sgt. Robinson was the first Public Information Officer in the Sheriff's Office and served in that capacity for approximately two years; and WHEREAS, Sgt. Robinson spent his last eight years assigned to the Criminal Investigations Division, daily managing the activities of the detectives, and was noted for his ability to relate to citizens and reduce their concerns in very stressful situations; and WHEREAS, Sgt. Robinson, through his employment with Roanoke County, has been instrumental in improving the quality of life for its citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to ROGER F. ROBINSON for more than twenty-six years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke County; and 1 -~ BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy, restful, and productive retirement. 2 m: ..~. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2000 RESOLUTION EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY UPON THE RETIREMENT OF EDWARD A. SHOTWELL, POLICE DEPARTMENT WHEREAS, Edward A. Shotwell was first employed by Roanoke County on September 1, 1980 in as a Deputy Sheriff -Uniform Division in the Sheriff's Office; and also served as Deputy Sheriff Sergeant -Corrections before transferring to the Police Department; and WHEREAS, Officer Shotwell retired from Roanoke County on August 1, 2000 as a Police Officer -Uniform Division after more than twenty years of service; and WHEREAS, Officer Shotwell, prior to working for Roanoke County, had a distinguished career in the United States Army serving as a Noncommissioned Officer; and WHEREAS, Officer Shotwell's favorite duty was patrol; and he was well known and respected as a patrol officer in the Glenvar and Bradshaw areas of the County; and WHEREAS, Officer Shotwell possessed anextra-ordinary ability to work with people regardless of their situation as victim or offender; and WHEREAS, Officer Shotwell, through his employment with Roanoke County, has been instrumental in improving the quality of life for its citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke 1 .--- County to EDWARD A. SHOTWELL for more than twenty years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke County; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy, restful, and productive retirement. 2 „~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2000 RESOLUTION EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY UPON THE RETIREMENT OF LINDA S. HOGAN, POLICE DEPARTMENT WHEREAS, Linda S. Hogan was first employed by Roanoke County on July 1, 1971 as a dispatcher; and has also served as Lead PBX Operator and Lead Dispatcher; and WHEREAS, Ms. Hogan retired from Roanoke County on August 1, 2000, as the Chief Communications Officer with the Police Department after more than twenty-nine years of service; and WHEREAS, Ms. Hogan, as manager of the communications section, was an advocate for the communications personnel, and was respected and held in high esteem by her co-workers; and WHEREAS, as the result of Ms. Hogan's efforts, working conditions in the 911 Center improved greatly under her management; and WHEREAS, Ms. Hogan had an excellent rapport with County residents and was able to assist them in many life threatening situations, saving countless lives, and was instrumental in improving the quality of life for all citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to LINDA S. HOGAN for more than twenty-nine years of capable, loyal and 1 T dedicated service to Roanoke County; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy, restful, and productive retirement. 2 ~., r A-111400-3. h ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER. MEETING DATE: November 14, 2000 AGENDA ITEM: Acceptance of the Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) block grant by the Police Department for Law Enforcement Support. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: O~~'G~~u~ BACKGROUND' The Roanoke County Police Department applied for a BJA grant to provide law enforcement support. The grant will be used to purchase lap top computers to be installed in police vehicles. The grant has been approved by the BJA in the amount of $31,454.00. FISCAL IMPACT' The grant is for $31, 454.00 in federal funds and $3, 495.00 in local funds. The total amount is $34,949.00. The criteria of the grant requires a hard dollar match of local funds and is for a 24 month period. The local match will be taken out of existing police department funds. No additional funds will be requested. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Staff recommends acceptance of the grant from the Bureau of Justice Assistance. ., Respectfully submitted, Gc~~ mes R. Lavinder Chief of Police 3 Approved by, L~~~ Mr. Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by: Joseph McNamara to approve _ Church _ x Denied ( ) Johnson _ x Received ( ) McNamara- x Referred ( ) Minnix _ x _ To ( ) Nickens _ x cc: File Ray Lavinder, Chief of Police Diane D. Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer cc: File Chief Lavinder A-111400-3. i ITEM NUMBER ~" ACTION # AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 14, 2000 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Water and Sewer Facilities Serving The Gardens of Cotton Hill, Section 5 (Phase I) COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF IlVFORMATION: The Developers of The Gardens of Cotton Hill, Section 5 (Phase I), Strauss Construction Corporation, have requested that Roanoke County accept the Deed conveying the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the subdivision along with all necessary easements. The water and sanitary sewer facilities are installed, as shown on plans prepared by Lumsden and Associates entitled The Gardens of Cotton Hill, Section 5 (Phase I), which are on file in the Community Development Department. The water and sanitary sewer facility construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County. FISCAL IMPACT: The value of the water and sanitary sewer construction is $18,050.00 and $35,570.00 respectively. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the Garden of Cotton Hills, Section 5 (Phase I) subdivision along with all necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities. n APPROVED: ~%~ ~~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION VOTE No Yes Motion by: Joseph McNamara to approve _ Church _ x Johnson _ x McNamara_ x Minnix _ x Nickens x Abs cc: File Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development SUBMITTED BY: COPY ~-5 THIS CHATTEL DEED, made this 28th day of June , 20 00 , by and between: Strauss Construction Corporation , a Vir i~ nia corporation, hereinafter referred to as the "Developer," party of the first part; and the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, its successors or assigns, hereinafter referred to as the "Board," party of the second part. WITNESSETH: THAT FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual benefits accruing to the parties, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Developer does hereby GRANT, CONVEY, ASSIGN AND TRANSFER, with the covenants of GENERAL WARRANTY OF TITLE, in fee simple unto the Board all water and/or sewer lines, valves, fittings, laterals, connections, storage facilities, sources of water supply, pumps, manholes and any and all other equipment and appurtenances thereunto belonging, in and to the water and/or sewer systems in the streets, avenues, public utility, easement areas, water and sewer easement areas that have been or may hereafter be installed by the Developer, along with the right to perpetually use and occupy the easements in which the same may be located, all of which is more particularly shown, described and designated as follows, to wit: As shown on the plan entitled Section 5, The Gardens of Cotton Hill, made by Lumsden & Associates (dtd August 21 1996 Revised July 9 1999 August 6 1999 August 16, 1999 and September 17, 1999) and on file in the Roanoke County Department of Community Development. The Developer does hereby covenant and warrant that it will be responsible for the proper installation and construction of the said water and/or sewer systems including repair of surface areas affected by settlement of utility trenches for a period of one (1) year after date of acceptance by the Board and will perform any necessary repairs at its cost. 1 ..~ J--~ Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby joins in the execution of this instrument to signify the acceptance of this conveyance pursuant to Resolution No. adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, on the day of 20 2 i S-5 Developer: Address: By: As: State of: WITNESS THE FOLLOWING signatures and seals: President Title ~-at/City of: ~~("i(1r1~1-°~2~ , to wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this: ~. ~~ ,day of ~i ln~ 20 C ~C ? , By; Steven S. Strauss Its President Duly authorized officer (typed name) Title on behalf of: Strauss Construction Corporation r Notary Public My Commission expires: ~.8 fY}~}f'.~1 ~ ~, ~..~'~' 3 Strauss Construction Corporation S Approved as to form: Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia County Attorney Bv: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator (SEAL) State of: Virginia ' County/City of: Roanoke , to wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this: day of 20 , by Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator, on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. Notary Public My Commission expires: 4 f NORTH . ~c~ti~ A .. . ~ 8" SANITARY ' ~ ~ '<:: SEWER -~ ~" ~~: e ,` `, 8" WATER ~• ~d m o moo, J `` t, r ~ ti, ~~ ~ 1G '; u, ~` • ~(i .... .. r^ i ..~ ~, ~ ,', -_ ~ -' > • \~ ;,~~ .::~ . ~~,~ .~. ~; j ~~~~•• -- ~/. 8" SANITARY. SEWER ~/ ; ~ •I=.q~/ ~~ r ~ is .~ < ,~ ~ s• '~ ^• 8" SANITARY SEWER • 4, ~ 4 'I ~V ~~ ~ ~ .~ 1`b ~~ S'f~ ~ i . 8" WATER ~ ~~ ~` ~ ~ ~ _ J/ M ACCEPTANCE OF WATER AND ROANOKE COUNTY SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES UTILITY DEPARTMENT SERVING THE GARDENS OF COTTON'•. ~ HILL, SECTION 5 (PARTIAL-PHASE 1), ~ ,~ _~~ J. A-111400-3 . j ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~"~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMIlVISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 14, 2000 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Water and Sewer Facilities Serving Hickory Hill, Section 2 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~ ~ ~~,( ,i,Tyr~ar~ a~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Developers of Hickory Hill, Section 2, Townside Construction Company, Inc., have requested that Roanoke County accept the Deed conveying the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the subdivision along with all necessary easements. The water and sanitary sewer facilities are installed, as shown on plans prepared by T. P. Parker and Son entitled Hickory Hill, Section 2, which are on file in the Community Development Department. The water and sanitary sewer facility construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County. FISCAL IMPACT: The value of the water and sanitary sewer construction is $42,023.00 and $23,500.00 respectively. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the Hickory Hill, Section 2 subdivision along with all necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities. J-b SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: Gary Robe son, P.E. Elmer C. Hodge Utility Direc or County Administrator ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by: Joseph McNamara to approve _ Church _ x Denied () Johnson _ x Received () McNamara- x _ Referred () Minnix _ x To () Nickens _ x cc: --- File Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development ~ ~ '~ ~ ~~~~ ~~ THIS CHATTEL DEED, made this 22 day of June , 19 98 , by and between: Townside Construction Company Inc , a Vir inia corporation, hereinafter referred to as the "Developer," party of the first part; and the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGIl~lIA, its successors or assigns, hereinafter referred to as the "Board," party of the second part. WITNESSETH: THAT FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual benefits accruing to the parties, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Developer does hereby GRANT, CONVEY, ASSIGN AND TRANSFER, with .the covenants of GENERAL WARRANTY OF TITLE, in fee simple unto the Board all water and/or sewer lines, valves, fittings, laterals, connections, storage facilities, sources of water supply, pumps, manholes and any and all other equipment and appurtenances thereunto belonging, in and to the water and/or sewer systems in the streets, avenues, public utility, easement areas, water and sewer easement areas that have been or may hereafter be installed by the Developer, along with the right to perpetually use and occupy the easements in which the same may be located, all of which is more particularly shown, described and designated as follows, to wit: Page 1 of 4 J-~O As shown on the plan entitled Hickorv Hills Section 2 ,made by T.P. Parker & Son and on file in the Roanoke County Engineering Department. The Developer does hereby covenant and wan-ant that it will be responsible for the proper installation and construction of the said water and/or sewer systems including repair of surface areas affected by settlement of utility trenches for a period of one (1) year after date of acceptance by the Board and will perform any necessary repairs at its cost. Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby joins in the execution of this instrument to signify the acceptance of this conveyance pursuant to Resolution No. adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, on the day of , 19 Page 2 of 4 .~--~ WITNESS THE FOLLOWING signatures and seals: Developer: By: As: State of: Virginia County/City of: Roanoke , to wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this: ~~~ r- day of ~' 19 ~` By: Jerry Grubb its President Duly authorized officer Title on behalf of Townside Construction Company Inc Notary Pudic ,~ ,~ ,, ~r (__~,~ I , My Commission expires: ~~ - ,~e;~,.~'~..t.-~ ~_`~ ~ ~~ ~ ~` Page 3 of 4 President Approved as to form: Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia BY~ (SEAL) County Attorney Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator State of: Virginia County/City of: Roanoke , to wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this: day of 19 , by Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator, on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. Notary Public My Commission expires: Page 4 of 4 i ~ ~ o©~~ f'~N . ~~ M,~,~ ~` /' ~-. ~ es so•4p. ~ ~ ?,~ 8" SANITARY SEWER ~~~ / 3~ -- ~ _ ~~~. `~` / ~~~~ ~~ SANITARY SEWER ROANOKE COUNTY UTILITY DEPARTMENT HICKORY HILL, SECTION 2 WATER AND SANITARY SEWER ~F A-111400-3. k ACTION ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 14,2000 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Water and Sewer Facilities Serving A Cleaner World COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Developers of A Cleaner World, RWE Properties, LLC, have requested that Roanoke County accept the Deed conveying the water and sanitary sewer facilities along with all necessary easements. The water and sanitary sewer facilities are installed, as shown on plans prepared by Davis- Martin-Powell & Associates entitled A Cleaner World, which are on file in the Community Development Department. The water and sanitary sewer facility construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County. FISCAL IMP ACT: The value of the water and sanitary sewer construction is $7,200.00 and $6,390.00 respectively. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the A Cleaner World along with all necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities. -.'~. ''• SUBMITTED BY: Gary Robert n, P.E. Utility Director ~' APPROVED: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by: Joseph McNamara to approve Church _ x Denied () Johnson _ x Received () McNamara- x Referred () Minnix _ x To () Nickens _ x cc: File Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development • • COPY ~ `7 RETURN To: ROANOhE COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE THIS CHATTEL DEED, made this ~ day of ~D//'~/!2' FfL , 19 ~, by and between: lUL-C 1~~7,E/'1 f lE5 . L L ~ , a /~.~ ~~},~~,yi¢ ~ e- r omen, hereinafter referred to as the "Developer," party of the first part; and the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, its successors or assigns, hereinafter referred to as the "Board," party of the second part. W'ITNESSETH: THAT FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual benefits accruing to the parties, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged; the Developer does hereby GRANT, CONVEY, ASSIGN AND TRANSFER, with the covenants of GENERAL WARRANTY OF TITLE, in fee simple unto the Board all water and/or sewer lines, valves, fittings, laterals, connections, storage facilities, sources of water supply, pumps, manholes and any and all other equipment and appurtenances thereunto belonging, in and r_o the water and/or sewer systems in the streets, avenues, public utility, easement areas, water and sewer easement areas that have been or may hereafter be installed by the Developer, along with the right to perpetually use and occupy the easements in which the same may be located, all of which is more particularly shown, described and designated as follows, to wit: Page 1 of 4 • • ;_~ As shown on the plan entitled ~ C~Fi9~r/~~__ ~D~1~ ,made ,t7~2iL /3. ~~~~ and on file in the Roanoke County Engineering Department. The Developer does hereby covenant and warrant that it will be responsible for the proper installation and construction of the said water and/or sewer systems including repair of surface areas affected by settlement of utility trenches for a period of one (1) year after date of acceptance by the Board and will perform any necessary repairs at its cost. Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby joins in the execution of this instrument to signify the acceptance of this conveyance pursuant to Resolution No. adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County. Virginia, on the day of , 19 Paae 2 of 4 • • .,.,.~ T~ Developer: Bv: As: State of: _ ~(~ ~ County/City of: ~71~1 ~-F17~ , to wit: The foregoing insh~.unent was acknowledged before me this: ~.-~ ,day of ~~~Vl/L~j~ 19 g~_, By: _ TZaY Vs! , Ih.~A.1/ ~ Its N1AVlGi.A ~,V' Duly authoorized officer (typed name) Title on behalf of: ~ ~ ~ ~~~~-,'1 ~e, ~ (,_ ~.~ ~p, N My Commission expires blic ~~. ;~ ~ti2 _ -~ ;r- G'; ~'UBL~G ~ v, ~ ~': ''"~-v'~o cov` Page 3 of 4 WITNESS THE FOLLOV~~ING signatures and seals: + .. .. 4... y • • ~. Approved as to form: Board of Supervisors of Roanol~e County, Virginia By: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator SEAL) County Attorney State of: Virginia County/City of: Roanoke . to wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this: day of 19 , by Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator, on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County; Virginia. Notary Public My Conunission expires: Page 4 of 4 1 ^\ \ , ~ \ 5~~°a~ ~~/ TWO STY- \ \ `` ` ~1 ~ ~/~, •. \ s~ \ 8RlCK \~~P4~1 ~ / ~d ~d'~ \ ~ COMP. ROOF P~/ \ -~ 1 tni \ \ \ ~ / /Q~~'j / j ~/~ l Rlb'rER / F /j,l , / , 9 / / /~ ////i ~ \/ / /, r~-s~ __ - / / y'~ / / ~ i __ / /l '_ 9' „ayY ~.°.~~ - i / ~ ~"- P ~ e~~ / / ~ / / Q%!~'y ~ ~ 'e ~ ~~ ~. END OF £X/ n C / / .'if / / ~,~~ _(~~ pF/ i u/~// 72" WATEI~C/NE ti~ ~~_ -,u-/~_ ~,~i/ / i/ ~~C\1~ ~~i / EXIST. /5"CMP' _- tee. ~ ~ -'" ~ / / , ~ /,G TO BE REMOVED/ ~O ~ 9~,"/ ~ ~ ~1° ~ b~; ~r UNOERGROUNO PNO E (/N£ V ~_ % l 9'OA T~ CAF ~ / ~ 6 ~ CO ~ . 0 _ / / R' n~ / l ~ ~~ / APPROK LOCH/d•ON OA / r i i i i ~ ~ ~ /"~ ~/ ~8 1 / I~ ~~ i'/ ~ s \ o Ys Grp \ ~ S G\ ~ Aaa 11 ~ ~%~ \, AR u/c rcN ANHOL~ ~; ~~V s '\ 7' \ ~\ To \ ~ ~`'',o r ' ~ 2\ ~l ~ '/V1T LL \ cvr /G~~ ~ l `Y1T~ ~ . .~ ~\ ~- \ ~\\. E \ I\ sk ~ ~ ~~P / ~ A 1 ~"~ ~ (POSS/BGY F/BER 71C / ~ i n / / ~ ~ ~, ,61' ~ / SEE UAL/7~ NO f5 ~/S SHEETJ o- PROP. MANNO / 4 ~ ~~ / /' / ' \ TOP 1037. SO 90k•~9-0 / /~ / \O / ~ INV. 1023.0 ~// ~ZON/NG L/NE ~H/ ~ ~ // / / <~~ 1 ~ / ~/ l ~ ~ TBM A1L /N / ~ , POWE~POLE" ~~~5{' ti~9 v sExvAic~ra EL~ 1026.5.' J~. ~ ~ 12" WATER LINE e~~A°° ~ ~~ / /' p ~ 72'x 6' TEE' ~' Q`r / S7h ~C ~~~ ,(~ i-s wcaVi~r~f AL BDx ~ ~a, ~ / G ~~ / // ' 7-/2' /V & q BOX / Q-P~C. P / ~~ ~ ~,( / ~ Q tJZ / ~SEMBL O (COt/NTY OF / / ~/F' P ~D TEIEPHON ~. '~UMf~j MANHOLL~ <~~// / / ~ ~~ ~" 8" SAl~TITARY SEWER i~~,c / , ~1 }~N /NVERT 70 .B9 / +~~ _~_ T \ ROANOKE COUNTY UTILITY DEPARTMENT A CLEANER WORLD WATER & SANITARY SEWER. II K ,' . A-111400-3. I ITEM NUMBER ~" ACTION # AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIIZGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 14, 2000 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Water and Sewer Facilities Serving Whitney Estates, Section 1 and 2 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: d/~'`''„~ ~Q,,~~-µ-~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Developers of Whitney Estates, Section 1 and 2, Graham-Thomas, LLC, have requested that Roanoke County accept the Deed conveying the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the subdivision along with all necessary easements. The water and sanitary sewer facilities are installed, as shown on plans prepared by Lumsden Associates, entitled Whitney Estates, Section 1 and 2, which are on file in the Community Development Department. The water and sanitary sewer facility construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County. FISCAL IMPACT: The value of the water and sanitary sewer construction is $56,270.00 and $65,110.00 respectively. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the Whitney Estates, Section 1 and 2 subdivision along with all necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities. t ~-8 SUBMITTED BY: Gary Roberts , P.E. Utility Director APPROVED: (~~r~' Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by: Joseph McNamara to approve _ Church _ x _ Denied () Johnson _ x _ Received () McNamara- x Referred () Minnix _ x To () Nickens _ x _ cc: File Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development .,~- ~ Return To: ~~ Roanoke County ~!~`,`*'~ Attorney's Office THIS CHATTEL DEED, made this 20th day of October , 2000, by and between Graham - Thomas,l~LC , a Virginia Corporation, hereinafter referred to as the "Developer," parry of the first part; and the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, its successors or assigns, hereinafter referred to as the "Board," parry of the second part. WITNES SETH: THAT FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual benefits accruing to the parties, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Developer does hereby GRANT, CONVEY, ASSIGN AND TRANSFER, with the covenants of GENERAL WARRANTY OF TITLE, in fee simple unto the Board all water and/or sewer lines, valves, fittings, laterals, connections, storage facilities, sources of water supply, pumps, manholes and any and all other equipment and appurtenances thereunto belonging, in and to the water and/or sewer systems in the streets, avenues, public utility, easement areas, water and sewer easement areas that have been or may hereafter be installed by the Developer, along with the right to perpetually use and occupy the easements in which the same maybe located, all of which is more particularly shown, described and designated as follows, to wit: As shown on the plan entitled Wh~tnev atP~ Section 1 (4/21 /9gl and Whitney ,s ate. ,Section 2 (8/17/991 ,made by L.umsden Associates, PC And on file in the Roanoke County Department of Community Development. The Developer does hereby covenant and warrant that it will be responsible for the proper installation and construction of the said water and/or sewer systems including repair of surface areas affected by settlement of utility trenches for a period of one (1) year after date of acceptance by the Board and will preform any necessary repairs at its cost. Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby joins in the execution of this instrument to signify the acceptance of this conveyance pursuant to Resolution No, adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, on the day of , 20 2 J- WITNESS THE FOLLOWING signatures and seals: Developer: Graham -Thomas . LLC Address: `~ q~L ~ LP ~ w~ o a..p ~n ~~^ LlP~ Z U i 5 `'~ By: As: Title State of: Virginia , County/City of: Roanoke , to wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this: ,~,'[? ,day of ~.~I-G~1~-~r , 20~~, By; ~~ ~ ~~.~~ l~c7wa.~ Its {~.e ~,~Z~~ Dul~~'authorized officer (typed name) Title on behalf of: .I.1 ~r,...~. :~ Notary My Commission expires: moo. aoG 3 Approved as to form: County Attorney State of: County/City o£ Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia By: (SEAL) Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Virginia ' Roanoke , to wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this: day of , 2D , by Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator, on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. Notary Public My Commission expires: 4 - .,.- ~~' ~ ~ e~ ji A / ~ z P A .. ttHV4l+ F pQ ~ G~ nZ xi Z ~i ~ VI CINI ~'~' M.~~.P~ ROANOKE COUNTY ACCEPTANCE OF WATER AND SANITARY SEWER UTILITY DEPARTMENT FACILITIES SERVING WHITNEY ESTATES, SECTION 1 & 2 r'~ r~ °v ~ \ V I C~NI T Y 111A~'~ ~ , <-, 1 ~; ~, 10" WATER SEE SHEET 1 -_--'--W-- ~_-~ / SEE SHEET 1 ----- - . ,, ____ ,/~ ~+~~~fi,~3 ----= ~ ~-- 10" WATER ~~ ROANOKE COUNTY ACCEPTANCE OF WATER AND SANITARY SEWER. UTILITY DEPARTMENT FACILITIES SERVING WHITNEY ESTATES, SECTION 1 & 2 . ~~~i~ t 8" SANITARY SEWER _~• h .. ------ sF --_ 09,,,~QGO9 -,~r-------~.._ _.- ~~i__ .,,. '. ~ ~ ~'' '~. A-111400-3 . m ACTION NO. ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 14, 2000 AGENDA ITEM: DONATION OF .012 ACRE OF LAND, FOR PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY, FROM RESIDENTIAL CONTRACTORS, INC., (TAX MAP NUMBER 50.01-1-16.7) CONVEYED TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This consent agenda item involves conveyance of .012 acre of land to the Board of Supervisors for public right-of-way in the Hollins Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke: a) Conveyance of .012 acre portion for public right-of-way from Residential Contractors, Inc. (Tax Map No. 50.01-1-16.7) as shown on the map attached hereto (Exhibit "A"). The County's engineering staff has reviewed and approved the location and dimension of this right-of-way. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of this right-of-way. SU ITTED BY: '., ti ;` ~... - ~~ Arnold Covey, Director Department of Community Devel pment APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator 1 ~-~ _____________________ ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by: Joseph McNamara to approve _ Church _ x Denied () Johnson _ x Received () McNamara- x Referred () Minnix _ x To () Nickens _ x cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Gary Robertson, Director, Utility 2 `` s Exemption Claimed: Grantee is exempted from recordation taxes and fees pursuant to ~ 58.1-811A(3), Code of Virginia. Prepared by Martin, Hopkins & Lemon P. O. Box 13366 Roanoke, Virginia 24033 Tax Map No.: 50.01-1-16.7 Property Owners: Residential Contractors, Inc., a Virginia corporation THIS QUITCLAIM DEED, made this 6 day of OCTOBER , 2000, by and between RESIDENTIAL CONTRACTORS INC., a Virginia corporation ("Grantor") and the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY. VIRGI_NIA ("Grantee"). W I T N E S S E T H V[artin, Hopkins & Lemon, P. C. THAT, FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the benefits accruing or to accrue to the said Grantor by reason of the location and construction, or other improvement of Autumn Drive, along, through, or over the lands of the Grantor, and for the further consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00} cash in hand paid, and other good and valuable consideration paid by Grantee to Grantor, the receipt, adequacy and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Grantor does hereby quitclaim, release, and convey unto the said Grantee all right, title and interest they may possess in and to the following described real estate lying in the County of Roanoke, Virginia, for the location and construction or other improvement of a road right-of-way: That .012 acre portion, more or less, of Roanoke County Tax Map Number 50.01-1-16.7 shown on the plat attached hereto as Exhibit "A", and by this reference made a part hereof, (the "Property")• 1 .~ Martin, HoQkins & Lemon, P.C. J-~1 Also granted herein is the temporary right and easement to use such additional areas as located and staked on the ground for cut and/or fill slopes as being required for the proper execution of the work. Said temporary easement will terminate at such time as the construction or improvement of the aforesaid route is completed. And further granted herein is the right and easement to construct, improve and maintain any drain ditches or other drainage facilities that may be needed for the proper and adequate drainage of said route. Grantor, for the consideration stated above, also covenant and agree, upon demand of any public utility company or corporation having its facilities in, over or across the lands herein conveyed, that the Grantor will give, grant and convey unto such public utility company or corporation an easement in, over and across the lands of the Grantor lying adjacent to tine lands herein conveyed for the relocation, construction, operation and maintenance of said facilities. The Grantor by execution of this instrument acknowledges that the plans for the aforesaid road right-of-way as it affects their property have been fully explained to them or their authorized representative. The Grantor covenants and agrees for themselves, and for their heirs, successors, successors in title, executors, legal representatives and assigns that the consideration aforementioned shall be in lieu of any and all claims to compensation and 2 J-~ damages by reason of the location, construction, reconstruction, operation or maintenance of said road right-of-way, including such drainage facilities as may be necessary. This conveyance is made expressly subject to all recorded conditions, reservations, easements and restrictions affecting title to the property herein conveyed. The road right-of-way herein granted is in addition to, and not in lieu of, any easement or right-of-way now in existence or which may be acquired in the future. To have and to hold unto the Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby joins in the execution of this instrument to signify the acceptance by said Board of Supervisors of the real estate conveyed herein pursuant to Ordinance No. adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, on the day of RESIDENTIAL CONTRACTORS, INC. a Virginia corporation ( SEAL ) By Title Martin, ~~ Hopkins & 3 Lemon, P.C. STATE OF «-~~~ ~ ;..-~.-L~-' COUNTY/CITY O J-~1 to-wit: The foregoing ins ,rument was acknowledged before me this ;,?~~, ~ by ( ~~-~~ day of '~; ~ ~; ;. ' `the ~ ~ ~" of Residential ~ . , _;, (° ~;,},~/ ,, ~ ~_ ~.:~ the Contr:~ctors, Inc., a Virginia corporation, on behalf o core"oration. `' ~~, `J~,.~ ~,.~fotary Pu lic ,; ~ ,.~ I ~ x, i ,x!. L^ ~' My commission expires: ~ - Approved as to form: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA ~~ a~~, ( SEAL ) By: Elmer C. Hodge Martin, Hopkins & Lemon, P.C. STATE OF VIRGINIA, COUNTY/CITY OF ROANOKE, to-wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me thisby day of ~ --~ Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator, on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. Notary Public My commission expires: Martin, II Hopkins & 4 Lemon, P.C. METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT REYR~'S'L''N"1' A ~'vM~OSITE OF DEEDS, PLATS, AND CALCULATED INFORMATION AND DO NOT REFLECT a1VT ACCURATE BOUNDARY SURVEY. N .--- ~~ ~~.. TAX MAP ,¢'50.01 ~;~.. "MOUNTA/N MEADOW ESTATES" "o z g 9~~ TZ P.B. 19, PG. 132 `b °~ o~o~o ~,. z~i ~~ \ \ ,6 I 8 ~ N p~ 11 ~ ~p~ ' LpT ~ ~pT ~+;~ Lp5 6 L \ NEW R/GHT-OF- WA Y AUTUMN DR. 0.012 Ac. ~~ EX/ST. 50' ROAD EASEMENT (D.B. 877, PG. 684) SEE DEA I//D D/CK SUR IiEY DATED MAY 8, 1969. - - - -L2 - - - - -~ ~ .. 556 43'00"E 566.30' 3725 AUTUMN DR/VF TAX MAP ,¢~ 50.01-1-16.6 Remaining Property of A. /ENNINGS ROBERTSON AND DOR/S K. ROBERTSON D.B. 1505, PG. 991 N56 43'00°w 58s so' L4 AUTUMN TAXI 50.01-1-13.1 Property of JOSEPH K. BUSHNELL AND I//RG/N/A A. BUSHNELL TRACT B, 0.7065 AC. D.B. 1170, PG. 456 LINE TABLE 1-2 2-3 4-5 5-6 TAX MAP NO 57.54' 27.97' 43.07' 27.97' 50.01-1-16.7 113.49' ~ 1 } 1 ~~ ~ ti 1 Q, ~ U w LOT ? , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ TAX MAP # SQO1-1-187 ~ RES/ONAAL ~£RAES /NG Z ~ , o ~ Q , D.B. 165 PG 1958 ~ p N , ~ U cn ~ 6 _. ~ / ~ ~~ / ~~ 5 _ ~ _ _ L 57.54' p`l 'oRi vE 2 3 4 _ _ -~ .Q PROPOSED 40' R/W TO 8E AOUIRED ~ TAX, 50.01-1-14 ~ Property of (~ JOSEPH K. BUSHNELL AND ~ I//RGIN/A A. BUSHNELL Q D.B. 1129, PG. 644 U ~c=1 c-2 L=84.15 L=42.08 Ton=55.94 Tan=27.98 X967521' ~g676'00' R=50.00 CHORD BEAR/NG= 575714'00"W ' R=25.00 CHORD BEAR/NG= 575ti4 DO"W CHORD= 74.5& CHORD= 37.28' PROPERTY TO BE 4U/TCLA/MED 1"=60' SCALE: _______ EXH4BI7 PLAT SHOWING NEW RIGHT-OF-WAY BEING CONVEYED TO ROANOKE COUNTY BY RESIDENTIAL CONTRACTORS, INC. PREPARED BY.• ROANOKE COUNTY DATE: 10= 6= 00 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - r' THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, IN REGULAR MEETING ON THE 14th DAY OF NOVEMBER 2000, ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING: RESOLUTION 111400-3.n REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF BLUE BIRD LANE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM WHEREAS, the street(s) described below was established on October 16, 1979, and serves at least 3 families per mile, and WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) has deemed this county's current subdivision control ordinance meets all necessary requirements to qualify this county to recommend additions to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to Section 33.1-72.1, Code of Virginia, and, WHEREAS, after examining the ownership of all property abutting this street, this Board finds that speculative interest does exist and deems that extenuating circumstances also exist to warrant this addition, and WHEREAS, this Board has determined that the pro rata share of speculative interests is the sum of $22,289.08, as prescribed by Section 33.1-72.1 (D), code of Virginia NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the following street be added to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to Section 33.1-72.1 (D), Code of Virginia: Name of Street: Blue Bird Lane Length: 0.72 mi. From: Int. of White Oak Dr. (Rte. 883) To: cul-de-sac (Temporary) Guaranteed right-of-way width: 40 feet X03 mi.) 50 feet (.69 mi.) Plat Recorded, Date: October 16. 1979 Plat Book: 9 Page: 151 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board requests that the Virginia Department of Transportation to improve said street to the prescribed minimum standards, funding said improvements pursuant to Section 33.1-72.1 (D), Code of Virginia, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote Moved By: Supervisor McNamara Seconded By: None Required Yeas: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara Nays: None Absent: None A Copy Teste: ~• Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Virginia Department of Transportation 2 r ACTION # ~ ~~ ITEM NUMBER ~" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 14, 2000 AGENDA ITEM: Request for acceptance of Blue Bird Lane (rural addition) into the Secondary highway system and to improve the road to State standards COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: ~ ~'""" ` Staff requests the Board of Supervisors to adopt the attached resolution requesting the Virginia Department of Transportation to accept Blue Bird Lane under the rural addition program. BACKGROUND: The Code of Virginia under Section 33.1-72.1 allows counties to petition the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) to establish a rural addition program as long as this county's current subdivision control ordinance meets state highway laws. Currently, Roanoke County's subdivision ordinance meets all requirements established by law. Roanoke County currently has twenty-three roads on the priority list and three current requests pending Board and staff approval for addition. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: County and VDOT staff have been working together to establish plans and documents for Blue Bird Lane to be included in the highway system for the past several years. County staff recently completed the survey work, design, easement acquisition and collected the speculative interest due. 1 Sao existing utilities. Currently, Community Development has funds in the countywide account to cover these costs. Staff is requesting the Board of Supervisors to approve the resolution requesting Blue Bird Lane's addition to the secondary system of state highways. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: 1) Approve the attached resolution requesting VDOT to add Blue Bird Lane to the secondary highway system and to improve the road to State standards. 2) Defer approval to a later date. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative 1. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: `" ` Y Arnold Covey, Director Elmer C. Hodge Department of Community D velopment County Administrator -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE No. Yes Abs Approved () Motion by: Church _ Denied () Johnson _ _ Received () McNamara- _ Referred () Minnix - _ _ To () Nickens _ _ _ 2 tU .' ~ . THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, IN REGULAR MEETING ON THE 14th DAY OF NOVEMBER 2000, ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the street(s) described below was established on October 16. 1979, and serves at least 3 families per mile, and WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) has deemed this county's current subdivision control ordinance meets all necessary requirements to qualify this county to recommend additions to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to Section 33.1-72.1, Code of Virginia, and, WHEREAS, after examining the ownership of all property abutting this street, this Board finds that speculative interest does exist and deems that extenuating circumstances also exist to warrant this addition, and WHEREAS, this Board has determined that the pro rata share of speculative interests is the sum of $22,289.08, as prescribed by Section 33.1-72.1 (D), code of Virginia NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the following street be added to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to Section 33.1-72.1 (D), Code of Virginia: Name of Street: Blue Bird Lane Length: 0.72 mi. From: Int. of White Oak Dr. (Rte. 883) To: cul-de-sac ~Temporary) Guaranteed right-of-way width: 40 feet (.03 mi.~ 50 feet (.69 mi.) Plat Recorded, Date: October 16. 1979 Plat Book: 9 Page: 151 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board requests that the Virginia Department of Transportation to improve said street to the prescribed minimum standards, funding said improvements pursuant to Section 33.1-72.1 (D), Code of Virginia, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote Moved By: Seconded Yeas: Nays: By: A Copy Teste: Mary Allen, Board Clerk AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2000 RESOLUTION 111400-12 APPROPRIATING AND DONATING PUBLIC FUNDS TO THE ROANOKE COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY TO PAY INTEREST EXPENSE FOR THE VALLEY GATE- WAY SHELL BUILDING WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, ("the County") and the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County ("the Authority") desire to promote and encourage the economic development of Roanoke County, Virginia, and the Roanoke Valley by the recruitment of new industry for the Roanoke Valley, in order to provide for increased employment and corporate investment in the County; and WHEREAS, this increased employment and investment constitutes a valid public purpose for the expenditure of public funds; and WHEREAS, the County desires to support these economic development efforts of the Authority by donating public funds to the Authority in accordance with the provisions of § 15.2-1205 of the Code of Virginia. WHEREAS, by an agreement between the Authority, the County, F&W Properties I I, Inc., and the Greater Roanoke Valley Development Foundation ("the Foundation") a shell building was constructed at Valley Gateway. This agreement provides that the Authority will begin making the interest payments on the construction loan held by the Foundation beginning two years after the completion of construction (November 11, 2000) and continuing until either (a) the building is sold, or (b) the Foundation's five year note to the Authority has become due (May 15, 2002). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the sum of $45,000 is hereby appropriated and donated to the Authority. That this appropriation of public funds is made from funds available and previously appropriated in the County's Public Private Partnership account. 1 2. That this appropriation and donation to the Authority is made for the following economic development purposes: to pay the interest payments on the construction loan held by the Foundation on the shell building in Valley Gateway from November 11, 2000 through June 30, 2001. 3. That the appropriate officers or agents of the County are hereby authorized and directed to take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish the purposes of this resolution, and all actions taken by such officers and agents in connection with this transaction are hereby ratified and confirmed. 4. That this resolution shall take effect immediately. On motion of Supervisor McNamara to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: --!' ~ . Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File David Porter, IDA Secretary/Treasurer Ed Natt, IDA Legal Counsel Diane D. Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 2 ACTION NO. v/~ ITEM NUMBER `~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 14, 2000 AGENDA ITEM: Request to Appropriate Funds for the Interest Expense on the Valley Gateway Shell Building through June 30, 2001 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: When the shell building was constructed at Valley Gateway, an agreement was signed between the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County (the IDA), the County of Roanoke, F & W Properties II, Inc., and the Greater Roanoke Valley Development Foundation. As part of this agreement, the IDA agreed to begin making the interest payments on the construction loan held by the Greater Roanoke Valley Development Foundation beginning two years after the completion of construction (November 11, 2000) and continuing until either a) the building is sold, or b) May 15, 2002. This payment from the IDA is subject to appropriation of funds from the County. The construction loan outstanding is $772,090, and the interest is LIBOR + 2%, so it will vary from month to month. The interest rate charged for September 2000 was 8.6290%. FISCAL IMPACT: The Board will need to appropriate $45,000 for interest expense payments from November 11, 2000 through June 30, 2001. These funds will be transferred to the IDA to be paid to the Greater Roanoke Valley Development Foundation. If the building is not sold before June 30, 2001, an additional appropriation will be needed in the 2001-2002 fiscal year for interest expense for July 1, 2001 through May 15, 2002. M:\FINANCE\COMMON\Board-Reports\2000\] 1-14-0Oa.wpd ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2000 RESOLUTION APPROPRIATING AND DONATING PUBLIC FUNDS TO THE ROANOKE COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY TO PAY INTEREST EXPENSE FOR THE VALLEY GATEWAY SHELL BUILDING WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, ("the County") and the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County ("the Authority") desire to promote and encourage the economic development of Roanoke County, Virginia, and the Roanoke Valley by the recruitment of new industry for the Roanoke Valley, in order to provide for increased employment and corporate investment in the County; and WHEREAS, this increased employment and investment constitutes a valid public purpose for the expenditure of public funds; and WHEREAS, the County desires to support these economic development efforts of the Authority by donating public funds to the Authority in accordance with the provisions of § 15.2-1205 of the Code of Virginia. WHEREAS, by an agreement between the Authority, the County, F&W Properties II, Inc., and the Greater Roanoke Valley Development Foundation ("the Foundation") a shell building was constructed at Valley Gateway. This agreement provides that the Authority will begin making the interest payments on the construction loan held by the Foundation beginning two years after the completion of construction (November 11, 2000) and continuing until either (a) the building is sold, or (b) the Foundation's five year note to the Authority has become due (May 15, 2002). U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\GENERAL\shell.bldg.interest.app.wpd i ~ . j,_~. _._~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2000 RESOLUTION 111400-3.o APPROVING ISSUANCE OF BONDS THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE CERTIFIED MEDICAL REPRESENTATIVES INSTITUTE, INC. WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia (the "Authority")has considered the request of The Certified Medical Representatives Institute, Inc., a Virginia corporation (the "Company"), for the issuance of the Authority's Revenue Bonds in an amount not to exceed $3,000,000 (the "Bonds") to assist in the financing of an office facility, approximately 15,000 square feet in size, for use in the Company's educational enterprise (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, the owner and operator of the Project will be the Company; and WHEREAS, the Projectwill be located on a parcel of land (Tax Parcel 76.16-1-30) containing 3.7755 acres near the intersection of Electric Road and Postal Drive in Roanoke County, Virginia; and WHEREAS, the Authority held a public hearing on such application on November 1, 2000; and WHEREAS, the Authority has requested the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia (the "Board of Supervisors") to approve the issuance of the Bonds to comply with Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), which provides that the governmental units having jurisdiction over the issuer of private activity bonds and over the area in which any facility financed with the proceeds 1 of the private activity bonds is located must approve the issuance of the bonds; and WHEREAS, the Authority issues its bonds on behalf of the County, the Project is to be located in the County, and the Board of Supervisors constitutes the highest governmental unit of the County; and WHEREAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution approving the issuance of the Bonds, a summary of the comments made at the public hearing, if any, and a fiscal impact statement relating to the Project have been filed with the Board of Supervisors. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, AS FOLLOWS: 1. The Board of Supervisors approves the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority for the benefit of the Company, to the extent required by Section 147(f) of the Code, to permit the Authority to assist in the financing of the Project. 2. The approval of the issuance of the Bonds, as contained in this Resolution, does not constitute an endorsement of the Bonds, the financial viability of the Project or the creditworthiness of the Company. Further, as required by Section 15.2-4909 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, the Bonds shall provide that neither the Commonwealth of Virginia, the County, nor the Authority shall be obligated to pay the principal of, premium, if any, the interest thereon, or other costs incident thereto except from the revenues and monies pledged therefor and any applicable security, and neither the faith, credit, nor the taxing power of the Commonwealth, the Authority, or the County, shall be pledged thereto. 3. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. 2 On motion of Supervisor McNamara to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~' ~ . Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File David Porter, IDA Secretary/Treasurer Ed Natt, IDA Legal Counsel Diane D. Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 3 i Item No. ,~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, 5204 BERNARD DRIVE, SW., ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: November 14, 2000 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution to approve the issuance of up to $3,000,000 in revenue bonds by the Industrial Development Authority (IDA) of Roanoke County for the benefit of Certified Medical Representatives Institute. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Certified Medical Representatives Institute is anon-profit educational institution offering continuing education for the health care industry. It was founded in 1967. Proceeds from the bond issuance will be used to finance construction of a 15,000 square foot office facility on 3.77 acres (Tax No: 76.16-11-39) near the intersection of Electric Road and Postal Drive in Southwest Roanoke County. The proposed facility will be a two-story, colonial-style office building with brick veneer. The applicant projects significant growth over the next 5- 10 years. Employment levels are expected to increase from 20 to 40 over the period. At a public hearing of the IDA on November 1, 2000 the Authority passed an Inducement Resolution authorizing the issuance of revenue bonds up to the amount requested, (copy attached). No one spoke in opposition to the Resolution. FISCAL IMPACT The issuance of these bonds through the IDA does not have any fiscal impact on the County at this time. Future tax revenues will increase because of the expansion as outlined in the attached "Fiscal Impact Statement". ~_i a ALTERNATIVES 1. Approve the issuance of revenue bonds by the IDA for the benefit of Certified Medical Representatives Institute. 2. Decline to approve the issuance of revenue bonds by the IDA for the benefit of Certified Medical Representatives Institute. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the issuance of revenue bonds by the IDA for the benefit of Certified Medical Representatives Institute. Respectfully submitted: David R. Porter Director of Economic Development ACTION Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to ( ) Motion by: Approved: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator NO YES ABS Church Johnson McNamara Minnix Nickens 2 .. ~ ~ Fiscal Impact Statement INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA November 1, 2000 The Certified Medical Representatives Institute, Inc. Office Facility 1. Maximum amount of financing sought $3,000,000 2. Estimated taxable value of the facility's real property to be constructed in the municipality $2,410,000 3. Estimated real property tax per year using present tax rates $27,2333* 4. Estimated personal property tax per year using present tax rates $16,800 5. Estimated merchants' capital tax per year using present tax rates N/A 6. a. Estimated dollar value per year of goods $500,000 that will be purchased from Virginia companies within the locality b. Estimated dollar value per year of goods that will $50,000 be purchased from non-Virginia companies within the locality c. Estimated dollar value per year of services that will $500,000 be purchased from Virginia companies within the locality 1 J "+ d. Estimated dollar value per year of services that will $250,000 be purchased from non-Virginia companies within the locality 7. Estimated number of regular employees on year 20 round basis (excluding salaried employees) 8. Average annual salary per employee $40,781 (excluding salaried employees) (Note: all are salaried) *CMRI is anon-profit entity, exempt from real and personal property taxes. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA By~:: _ G~~ Chairman G:\WP\DAY\021741 Impact Statement.doc 2 t RESOLUTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA RECOMMENDING PUBLIC APPROVAL OF BONDS WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia (the DAuthority~) has held a public hearing on the request of The Certified Medical Representatives Institute, Inc., a Virginia non-stock, non-profit corporation (the ~Company0) that the Authority issue its Revenue Bonds in an amount not to exceed $3,000,000 (the ~BondsO), in order to finance the acquisition, construction and equipment of an office facility (the OProject0); and WHEREAS, Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, requires approval of the issuance of the Bonds by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA: 1. The Authority hereby approves the issuance of the Bonds, the proceeds of which will finance the Project for the benefit of the Company and recommends that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia approve the issuance of the Bonds. 2. The Chairman and Secretary of the Authority are hereby authorized and directed to forward to the Board of Supervisors a reasonably detailed summary of the comments, if any, made at the public hearing and a fiscal impact statement relating to the Project. 3. The approval of the Authority hereunder and its recommendation to the Board of Supervisors do not constitute an endorsement of the Bonds, the financial viability of the Project or the creditworthiness of the Company. 4. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. Adopted on November 1, 2000 G~~~~ Secretary, Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA RESOLUTION APPROVING ISSUANCE OF BONDS BY THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE CERTIFIED MEDICAL REPRESENTATIVES INSTITUTE, INC. WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia (the ~Authority~) has considered the request of The Certified Medical Representatives Institute, Inc., a Virginia corporation (the ~Company~), for the issuance ofthe Authority's Revenue Bonds in an amount not to exceed $3,000,000 (the ~Bonds~) to assist in the financing of an office facility, approximately 15,000 square feet in size, for use in the Company's educational enterprise (the ~Project0); and WHEREAS, the owner and operator of the Project will be the Company; and WHEREAS, the Project will be located on a parcel of land (Tax Parcel 76.16-1- 30) containing 3.7755 acres near the intersection of Electric Road and Postal Drive in Roanoke County, Virginia; and WHEREAS, the Authority held a public hearing on such application on November 1, 2000; and WHEREAS, the Authority has requested the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia (the ~BOard of Supervisors0) to approve the issuance of the Bonds to comply with Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the ~CodeO), which provides that the governmental units having jurisdiction over the issuer J-I ~ of private activity bonds and over the area in which any facility financed with the proceeds of the private activity bonds is located must approve the issuance of the bonds; and WHEREAS, the Authority issues its bonds on behalf of the County, the Project is to be located in the County, and the Board of Supervisors constitutes the highest governmental unit of the County; and WHEREAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution approving the issuance of the Bonds, a summary of the comments made at the public hearing, if any, and a fiscal impact statement relating to the Project have been filed with the Board of Supervisors. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ~OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, AS FOLLOWS: 1. The Board of Supervisors approves the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority for the benefit of the Company, to the extent required by Section 147(f) of the Code, to permit the Authority to assist in the financing of the Project. 2. The approval ofthe issuance ofthe Bonds, as contained in this Resolution, does not constitute an endorsement of the Bonds, the financial viability of the Project or the creditworthiness of the Company. Further, as required by Section 15.2-4909 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, the Bonds shall provide that neither the Commonwealth of Virginia, the County, nor the Authority shall be obligated to pay the principal of, premium, if any, the interest thereon, or other costs incident thereto except 2 -..)- ~ ~ THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, IN REGULAR MEETING ON THE 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2000, ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING: RESOLUTION 111400-3.p REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF (OVERLOOK TRAIL DRIVE) INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM WHEREAS, the streets described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(a), fully incorporated herein by reference, are shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, and WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised this Board the streets meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation, and WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised this Board the streets meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(A) to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board guarantees a clearand unrestricted right- of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote Moved By: Supervisor McNamara Seconded By: None Required Yeas: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara Nays: None Absent: None A Copy Teste: ~~ ~~ Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Virginia Department of Transportation ROANOKE COUNTY ROAD ACCEPTANCE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OY~'RL00S TRAIL DR. ("Parkway Pbace° Sedan 2) 9708P1RSY.dwg .--~ ~~ m C L U ~ G 0'1 Q 3 1 m a m a~ fn L C C O U d m' L O ~_ Q Z N Q a 0 t I a p E 2 c ~. m 9 ili a S e s a w 4 _~ Y L V O N O H H w U d a a Qi 6 a 0 .~ 7 0 m E m Z .~ C•7 ~ ~ ~ D n D O C Y, }' C h ~ V V W O n .~13 m$ ~m ~ ~ tf1 N N • ~ O U O t Q m ~t z O W '/' H 0 ~ m ID io ~ m 0 a° a a o- a W U ~ , 7 O a N ,. .. c 0.~ di 4 m ~ ~ v m Pa o n m p p 5 O U rn ~ ~ ~ < O I ^ A N b H I ^ ~ ~ ii o o m e a G' U 0 ~ p O ~ ~ i5 i5 i3 is H s i ~ ~ ° ~ ~ ° ~ F°- a ~-° -y r°, y r - a. a H~j W H b ,'~ .J ~ ~ Q O p (~ Z ^ N P7 r ~ ~ i ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 14, 2000 AGENDA ITEM: Acceptance of Overlook Trail into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: V & S Development, L.L.C., the developer of Parkway Place, Section 2, requests the Board of Supervisors approve a resolution to the Virginia Department of Transportation that they accept 0.5 miles of Overlook Trail Drive, from the intersection of Parkway Place Drive to its cul-de-sac. The staff has inspected this road along with representatives of the Virginia Department of Transportation and found the road is acceptable. No County funding is required. The staff recommends that the Board approve a resolution to VDOT requesting that they accept Overlook Trail into the Secondary Road System. S MITTED BY: APPROVED BY: Arnold Covey, Director Elmer C. Hodge 1 S )3 Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: VOTE Church Johnson McNamara Minnix Nickens No Yes Abs 2 y .._ DESCRIPTION: (1) Overbook Trail Dr. from the intersection of Parkway Pbace Dr. (Rt. 1932) to the cut-de-sac. LENGTH: (f) .25 Malea RIGST OF 1PAY.• (1) 40 Feet PAVEMENT 1rIDTS: (1) 28 Feet SERVICE: (1) 30 Bomea ROANOKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ROAD ACCEPTANCE OYERLOOS TRAIL DR. ("Parkway Place" Section, 2) 97'08PARSY. dwg PROPOSED ADDITION SHOIPN IN GRAY ~ '` ~'... THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, IN REGULAR MEETING ON THE 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2000, ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING: RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF (OVERLOOK TRAIL DRIVE) INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM WHEREAS, the streets described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(a), fully incorporated herein by reference, are shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, and WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised this Board the streets meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation, and WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised this Board the streets meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(A) to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street R~uirements. and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right- of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote A Copy Teste: Moved by: Seconded by: Yeas: Nays: Mary Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors pc: Arnold Covey, Director, Department of Community Development Virginia Department of Transportation File C m L U m{ _6 O ~~.r ,,~ VI L G C 'e O ^ U O U7 O & L_ F 2 O c y~ ? ~ ~ N O ~ ~ 2, ~ O H ~ H ~ a U C1 ¢ VW] o ~ ~ ~ ~ a- ~ a 1 y QI 4 ~ ~"~ N ® ~ ~ ~ as ~ C m O ~ ~ ~ s ~ L ~ ~ °_ to 1- ~ `o D r m u Q ~ Z /'~ O N h 0 '~ C ~ v-. r . c ~ `o N U W p n s m m ~ m ~, ~I1 N ~ N . O V O ~ m r Z e U ~' `.. O n W H m m m Q m m m ID m w m m ° ° a a d a ~ a d y a o. a W c U c a o a N ~ ~~ x ~ ~ •• ~ ~ ~ ~ $ ~ ~ ~ 6 ~ ~ ~ c r W O U \ ~ T' z cn ~ < o w ~ a _ H ~ b C7 I cV m W m m .. < C !] ,~ ~ m m c a c Q'' U o ~ ~ O ~ ~ ^ ~ W ~ o m a m ~ °o '~, m a ~ F ~ FF i F ~ s a ~ m c `a F S e m x a F a c m s a F a o m ~ a b ii c r a d S ~i ~ r a a b u: c r a ti c r ~ ti r a ~ r ~ u: r ~ ~ W H ~ H 1 f ' m ~ i x 1 h ~ b ~ a A , m ~. W z ~ O C m Z G r N C7 < ~ ~ O I ~ ' ~~ Z ur h C O Z O ~- U c t v ^ A-111400-3 . q ACTION NO. a,.. ITEM NUMBER -~ °~ ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 14, 2000 AGENDA ITEM: Request to abolish the Roanoke County Highway Transportation and Safety Commission to focus efforts on the Blue Ridge Transportation Safety Board COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: The Highway Transportation and Safety Commission was established by the Board of Supervisors in 1984 by resolution 84-37. There were 11 members on the commission representing various organizations and agencies interested in transportation safety. One of their most important duties was to approve grant requests. Grants are no longer processed in this manner. The commission now meets three or four times a year. They have an annual dinner to present awards and recognize various individuals for safety awareness. There are currently five vacancies on the commission that have not been filled. The remaining active members would have the opportunity to join the Blue Ridge Transportation Safety Board if they wished to. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: At the September 12 Board meeting, the Board of Supervisors requested that staff investigate the continuing need for this commission and whether the Blue Ridge Transportation Safety Board might be a more effective organization for safety awareness. Police Chief Ray Lavinder recommends rescinding the original resolution, abolishing the Roanoke County Highway Transportation Safety Commission and putting our efforts into the Blue Ridge Transportation Safety Board. The Blue Ridge Transportation Safety Board is made up of 16 counties, 8 cities and 23 towns. They meet quarterly with their primary focus on safety issues. They are currently involved in efforts such as Interstate 81 safety and emphasis on the importance of using child safety seats and bicycle helmets. The membership of the Board is comprised of individuals who are interested in various aspects of traffic safety and include police officers, insurance companies, and members of the legal, medical and law enforcement .`r ,-- `~ communities. Membership is by invitation of the Blue Ridge Transportation Safety Board and there is no established number of representatives from each locality. Roanoke County currently has two representatives serving on the Board, Police Officer Lee Linkous and Judge Phillip Trumpeter. Attached is a letter from Police Chief Ray Lavinder, a list of the current members and the localities who are members of the Blue Ridge Transportation Safety Board. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors rescind resolution 84-37, abolish the Roanoke County Highway Transportation Safety Commission and focus our efforts on the Blue Ridge Transportation Safety Board. It is further recommended that the current active members of the Roanoke County Highway Transportation Safety Commission be provided the opportunity to become active in the Blue Ridge Transportation Safety Board. ~i~- Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Motion by: Joseph McNamara to approve VOTE No Yes Abs Church _ x Johnson _ x McNamara- x Minnix _ x Nickens _ x cc: File Highway and Transportation Safety Board File Ray Lavinder, Chief of Police Blase Ridge Trtcnsportation Safety Board ~~ y Serri~+g rGe enunlius nj;1!!eg/mi+l~, AmheraT, ; I ppomnrlnx, 13n1h, r3er/jnrrl, r3uletourt. CnnrpLell, Chnrlorle. Crni~, Frnnklu+, Irnlifns, Uenr{•, Pillsl~h~nnin, Runnnke, Rockbrid,~e, ~g N+e cities ojl3edfurr1,13urnn VZstn, Clifton Fnr,~e. Covu+gron, Dan•il1e, L~cu+gun+, Lprrcl+brrrg, :~Inrlu+sville, Rnnnnke, Snlerr+ ~~ Soru413nstnn. Chauncey Lu};an Robert W, Strickler Roanoke City Public Schools, Retired C:hair~rlan Senior Officer R.W. Manspile Donna Amos Salem Police Dehartmenl Vice C/lair~er•sorr Officer A.J. P:urcbiancn Larry Holloway Buena Vista Police i~elat. Treasurer Sheriff Harold Plaster Bobby Ratliff Piltsylvania County Sheritt's Otlice Secretary Dr. Winsdon Pound Board Members St. Albans Psychiatric Hospital Donna Amos is` Sgt. Bobby Ratliff Jack Sale Itrsurance Virginia State Police Frank Frazier Sheriff Ronald N. Sprinkle Martinsville/Heruy County Botetourt County Sheritt,s Ot~ice Officer Roger Fuller Kenlev S. S~t~ith Roanoke County Police Dept. Car Guys, hie. Dr. Carol Gilbert Cal, t. Robert tiV. Strickler Roanoke Memorial Hospital Fraiil:Iin County Sherii~,s Otlice Chief Milton Graham Judt;e Philip Trompeter Bedford County Police Dept. 23"~ District Juvenile 8i Bayard Harris Dorncstic Relations Court Woods, Rogers, sec liazlegrove; Jeff Wendell Larry Holloway Jolu~ Norman Clothiers Nationwide hisurance State Board Mernbcr: Officer Eddie Hopkins Barbara Norris Duerk Roanoke City Police Dept. Sup~~ort Staff Mary S. King Steven D. Goodtivin Private Citizen DMV Transportation Salety Officer M. Lee Linkous, Jr. Jessica Bl:ui~l Roanoke County Police Dept. IZtullord l.Inivcrsily ` a` ~~~ 3568 Peters Creek Road Roanoke County Roanoke, Virginia 24019 ~OANOk~ Police Department O Fax' 540/561-80143 POLICE oouN~~ James R. Lavinder Chief of Police To: Elmer Hodge County Administrator From: Ray Lavinderi Date: November 3, 0 Subject: Highway Transportation Commission The local Transportation and Safety Commission was initially formed to approve grant requests. Because of changes in the last sixteen years in the way grants are processed, the approval of a local "board" is no longer necessary. It appears that the commission has outlived it original purpose. The board does bring various members of the community together to discuss local safety issues. The board also annually recognizes persons who have contributed to local safety, as does many other local organizations. There is the possibility that we could be criticized for doing away with a "safety commission" at a time when highway safety is very much an issue with local citizens i.e. I-81 and 220-I-73. My recommendation would streamline our operations by putting all our efforts into the Blue Ridge Transportation Safety Board. It is located locally on Airport Road and addressees the same issues as does the County's Commission, it is composed of the same type of citizen groups as the commission. The Roanoke County Police Department has a member on its board; we are represented by Officer Lee Linkous. It is my opinion that if we rescind the original resolution and place our effort in the Blue Ridge Transportation Safety Board, we can be more cost effective and productive. ,~~= ==_~ ~, i~,~i y;R~ ~ ~~~ A NATIONALLY ACCREDITED AGENCY Y ' F ACTION NGA-111400-3 . r ITEM NO. `~'~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 14, 2000 AGENDA ITEM: Request to accept the Adult Literacy and Basic Education Program Grant COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: -~ ~~ BACKGROUND: We have received grant funding approval from the State Department of Education for the Adult Literacy and Basic Education/GED program operated by Roanoke City Schools and administered by TAP -This Valley Works, under the auspices of the Roanoke County/Salem Jail facility. The funding period will run from October 1, 2000 through June 30, 2001. The total funding is in the amount of $6,500. We will be required to provide matching funds in the amount of $15,074, which will be supplied from the Sheriff's SubFund. Acceptance of this grant will require no additional funding from the Board of Supervisors. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The grant was approved by letter on October 16, 2000. The grant period is from October 1, 2000 through June 30, 2001. The total amount of the grant is $6,500 in federal funds and requires matching funds in the amount of $15,074, which will be supplied from the Sheriff's SubFund. No additional and/or matching funding from the Board of Supervisors will be required. FISCAL IMPACT: None ALTERNATIVES: None STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the acceptance of the awarded funds. Respectfully submitted, d .,~ ,~~ Gerald S. Holt Sheriff Approved by, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ~,. ., ~ i~ Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Motion by: Joseph McNamara to approve Church _ x _ Johnson _ x _ McNamara_ x _ Minnix _ x _ Nickens x cc: File Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff Diane D. Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer ~_..;~~ i AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2000 RESOLUTION 111400-3.s RECOGNIZING PRESERVATION EFFORTS ON READ MOUNTAIN AND APPROVAL OF APPLICATION FOR FUNDING FOR CONSERVATION EASEMENTS AND LAND ACQUISITION WHEREAS, a group of property owners and interested citizens have initiated efforts to enhance and preserve Read Mountain; and WHEREAS, the mountains and ridgelines in Roanoke County are unique and vital resources of both scenic and natural value; and WHEREAS, goals of the Roanoke County Community Plan include the preservation and management of the natural, historic and scenic resources of Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, objectives of the Roanoke County Community Plan include the requirement that land management policies preserve the natural scenic and historic environment while accommodating future growth and development, protect the mountainsides and ridgetops, and encourage land use patterns that conserve and protect open space thereby providing wildlife habitat and recreational opportunity; and WHEREAS, the views and preservation of Read Mountain have been identified as important to the Hollins and Bonsack Community Planning Areas; and WHEREAS, the acquisition of conservation easements and/or real property on Read Mountain would be the cornerstone for the preservation of Read Mountain as an urban forest for all citizens of the Roanoke Valley to enjoy; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia: 1 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO . ~.~+`""' ~ "'"' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 14, 2000 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution of Support for a Virginia Land Conservation Foundation Grant Application - Protection of Read Mountain COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Recommend approval. I recently hiked with others, to the top of Read Mountain and would like to ask the Board to go with us in the next few weeks. I am optimistic that we can get much of the local match through donations from property owners and other sources. This resolution is required in order to submit the application. BACKGROUND: Read Mountain is a familiar landmark to citizens of Roanoke County as well as Roanoke City and Botetourt County. Due to its location between I-81, I-581, US-220A, US-460 and its proximity to the Blue Ridge Parkway and the Appalachian Trail it is also viewed by thousands of commuters, travelers and hikers. At 2350 feet above the valley floor, Read Mountain is 2.8 miles long and approximately 1.25 miles wide at its base. The steep slopes, poor soils and low monetary value of the Read Mountain forest have discouraged development of the mountaintop. Although the rising tide of urban development has swept along the valley at an accelerating pace, this mountain island has remained essentially untouched. This status quo will not remain indefinitely. Loss of Read Mountain to development is a real possibility. Currently portions of the mountain are zoned AG-3 Agricultural while other portions are zoned R-1 and R-2, Single Family Residential. Protection of this landmark mountain presents a unique opportunity to preserve critical scenic viewsheds and ridgelines, retain woodland forests and provide hiking trails for residents and visitors alike. The Roanoke County Community Plan recommends the preservation and protection of the w~ HIV 2 mountainsides and ridgetops in Roanoke County and the future land use plan places Read Mountain in a Conservation designation. In response to this need, a dedicated group of County residents have initiated a planning effort to protect Read Mountain. This citizen driven initiative has included historical research, mapping, landowner contacts, trail construction and lobbying. Their effort is fueled by the underlying principle that the preservation of Read Mountain is a critical quality of life issue in the Roanoke Valley with both local and regional importance. As with many of the mountains that are in the foreground of the Roanoke Valley, Read Mountain is totally in private ownership. The most important areas of the mountainsides and ridge for protection are privately owned by three landowners. The Crumpacker family owns approximately 180 acres in this critical area, the Durham family owns approximately 90 acres and the Bradshaw family owns approximately 290 acres. Both the Crumpackers and the Durhams have been contacted and expressed willingness to sell. The Bradshaw family also appears interested in protecting the mountain. Staff has developed, with the assistance of these interested citizens, several alternatives for protecting this critical landmark mountain. All of the scenarios involve a combination of fee simple ownership and open space/greenway easements. Staff estimates that these three parcels of land, totaling 560 acres, could be purchased for approximately $460,000. This estimate is based on assessed values and on discussions with landowners. Bargain sales and purchase of conservation easements could reduce this total price. Ultimately, there are additional important parcels of land on the mountain that need to be protected and parcels or easements that need to be acquired to provide public access. This initial plan only includes the three most critical parcels at the highest elevations. The Virginia Land Conservation Fund provides matching grants to localities for the purchase of fee simple title to and conservation easement interests in real property for the purpose of land conservation. Grant awards can be made for a maximum of 500 of total project costs. Donated conservation easements or below appraised value sales of property can be counted towards the match. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: ~~ 3 Staff recommends that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors approve the resolution of support for a grant application to the Virginia Land Conservation Foundation in the amount of $200,000 for the protection of Read Mountain. If matching grant funds are required, staff will request these funds from the Board of Supervisors at a later date. Respectfully Submitted, anet Scheid, Se for Planner Department of Community Development Approved, ~~~~ / v Elmer C. Ho ge County Administrator Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Church Johnson McNamara Minnix Nickens Vote No Yes Abs J t AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2000 RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING PRESERVATION EFFORTS ON READ MOUNTAIN AND APPROVAL OF APPLICATION FOR FUNDING FOR CONSERVATION EASEMENTS AND LAND ACQUISITION WHEREAS, a group of property owners and interested citizens have initiated efforts to enhance and preserve Read Mountain; and WHEREAS, the mountains and ridgelines in Roanoke County are unique and vital resources of both scenic and natural value; and WHEREAS, goals of the Roanoke County Community Plan include the preservation and management of the natural, historic and scenic resources of Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, objectives of the Roanoke County Community Plan include the requirement that land management policies preserve the natural scenic and historic environment while accommodating future growth and development, protect the mountainsides and ridgetops, and encourage land use patterns that conserve and protect open space thereby providing wildlife habitat and recreational opportunity; and WHEREAS, the views and preservation of Read Mountain have been identified as important to the Hollins and Bonsack Community Planning Areas; and WHEREAS, the acquisition of conservation easements and/or real property on Read Mountain would be the cornerstone for the preservation of Read Mountain as an urban forest for all citizens of the Roanoke Valley to enjoy; 1 O~ QOANO,~~` ti .~ 9 o~ s AGENDA ITEM NO. 1838 APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE X CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: lr ICJ aso~J~'iS~t I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~ ~a~~ ~e~n~ ADDRESS: L ~ 1 k5 ~r-~~Ri ~.. PHONE: 9 ~.4 -~f 8 S ~ O~ POAN ,Y~` ~ •' ~ ~ z ~~; ~ a 1838 AGENDA ITEM NO. APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE ~~ SUBJECT: 1~`t~r ~ ,~ -< < ~rf`~ ~~CITIZEN COMMENTS ~~,. ' , <.f., m I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW; ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~,~ ~~';`~ /'- ~~ ~:~ ~' ~~ ADDRESS: ~~~~' ~~~~~ ~ a, -1 PHONE: I i' ~ { N-I GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA of General Amount Fund Revenues Unaudited Beginning Balance at July 1, 1999 $7,269,259 6.11% Oct 24, 2000 Funds for twenty additional paramedic firefighters (907,000) and planning for renovations to Vinton, Read Mountain, and Mason Cove stations Balance at November 14, 2000 $6,362,259 5.35% Changes below this line are for information and planning purposes only. Balance from above $6,362,259 Addition from 1999-2000 operations 2,639,382 $9,001,641 7.57% Note: On December 18, 1990, the Board of Supervisors adopted a goal statement to maintain the General Fund Unappropriated Balance at 6.25% of General Fund Revenues 2000 - 2001 General Fund Revenues $118,982,797 6.25% of General Fund Revenues $7,436,425 Respectfully Submitted, •~ 1.tvnrv Q- Diane D. Hyatt Chief Financial Officer Approved By, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator M:\Finance\Common\Board-Reports\MonthlyReports\GENOO.xIs 11/09/2000 ~! CAPITAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Amount Balance from June 27, 2000 Board meeting $279,722.09 Balance at November 14, 2000 Respectfully Submitted, Approved By, ~~.~ ~ . ~~ Diane D. Hyatt Elmer C. Hodge Chief Financial Officer County Administrator $279,722.09 ~ M:\Finance\Common\Board-Reports\Month~yReports\CAPOO.xIs 11/07/2000 ~' RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Amount From 2000-2001 Original Budget $100,000.00 July 25, 2000 Contribution to D-Day Memorial (10,000.00) Sept 12,2000 Video distribution for Senior and Challenged Citizens Commission (1,000.00) Sept 12,2000 Project Impact (12,800.00) Balance at November 14, 2000 Respectfully Submitted, ~~~~~ ~~ Diane D. Hyatt Chief Financial Officer Approved By, f~/ lIP°r Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator $76,200.00 M:\Finance\Common\Board-Reports\MonthlyReports\BOARDOO.xIs 11/07/2000 N-y FUTURE SCHOOL CAPITAL RESERVE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Savings from 1996-1997 debt budget $670,000.00 Transfer from County Capital Projects Fund 1,113,043.00 FY1997-1998 Original budget appropriation 2,000,000.00 June 23, 1998 Savings from 1997-98 debt fund 321,772.00 FY1998-1999 Original budget appropriation 2,000,000.00 FY1999-2000 Original budget appropriation 2,000,000 Less increase in debt service (1,219,855) 780,145.00 November 9, 1999 Savings from 1998-99 debt fund 495,363.00 FY2000-2001 Original budget appropriation 2,000,000 Less increase in debt service (],801,579) 198,421.00 Balance at November 14, 2000 $7,578,744.00 Reserved for Future School Operations FY2000-2001 Original budget appropriation $1,500,000.00 July 11, 2000 SW Co Regional Stormwater (290,000.00) Balance at November 14, 2000 1,210,000.00 Receivable from Roanoke County for purchase of refuse vehicles - to be repaid within two years (736,680.00) $ 473,320.00 Respectfully Submitted, Approved By, l ~" ~CCL.nn~ ~ Diane D. Hyatt Elmer C. Hodge Chief Financial Officer County Administrator M:\Finance\Common\Board-reports\MonthlyReports\SCHOOLOO.xIs 11/07/2000 N~~ ~ln~zxct~ of ~2u~rz~IIke ,~,~ ~x~~~r~ ~c r.~ O~ ROAN ~~ -( ~ L 2 ~ Z a 38 DECLARING THE MONTH OF NOVEMBER 2000 AS AMERICAN MUSIC WEEK WHEREAS, music, the universal language of peace, is one of the great arts and an outstanding feature of our culture; and WHEREAS, the national Federation of Music Clubs, having as a foremost objective, the promotion of American Music, wilt stage its annual "Parade of American Music" throughout the month of PIovember; and WHEREAS, the Virginia Federation of Music Clubs and the Thursday Morning Music Club are component parts of the lational Federation of Music Clubs, and join in encouraging and stimulating interest in American Music and the enjoyment and appreciation thereof; and WHEREAS, the "Parade of American Music" is designed to give our own worthy United States composers recognition, encouragement and support, and to impress upon the public of the United States that it has creative as well as performing musical artists and a musical culture equal to that of other countries PIOW, THEREFORE, WE, Joseph MctYamara, Chairman of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, and Elmer Hodge, ` County Administrator, in recognition of the American Composer and in order to encourage native creative musical art, do hereby proclaim the month of lYovember 2000 as AMERICAN MUSIC MONTH in Roanoke County; and FURTHER, urge all of our citizens to join in the observance and share the joy of music. /~/~-~- eph Mc1~Iamara, Chairman ~Ylw/ Elmer C. odge, ounty Administrator ATTEST: r ~. Mary H. AI-en, Clerk to the Board ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~""'~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 14, 2000 AGENDA ITEM: Status Report on Emergency Medical Dispatch Program COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: At the last meeting, the Board requested a report on the status of the Emergency Medical Dispatch Program. I am pleased to report that our efforts have been successful as described in the attached memo from Police Chief Ray Lavinder. The Program goal was to be to operational by January 1, 2000 and the County met that goal with every dispatcher trained and fully operating by January 1, 2000. ~~~~ ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE No. Yes Abs Approved () Motion by: Church _ Denied () Johnson _ Received () McNamara- _ _ Referred () Minnix To () Nickens _ _ _ ~aa ~• Z 70 ~OANOkF POLICE oouN~-~ James R. Lavinder Chief of Police ~~`~ (~'~ 3568 Peters Creek Road Roanoke COllnty Roanoke, Virginia 24019 Office: 540/561-8071 Police Department Fax: 540/561-8143 To: Elmer Hodge County Administrator From: Ray Lavinder Date: November 3, 2000 Subject: EMD We had previously planned for the Emergency Medical Dispatch program to be operational by January 1, 2000. We met that goal and every dispatcher was trained by that date. We were fully operational on January 1, 2000. We are fully staffed in the dispatch center at this time. The pay raise for dispatchers which was implemented on the same day as the pay raise for police, deputy sheriffs, and fire and rescue, has helped significantly in the recruiting and retention of dispatchers. We have been able to recruit a number of fully trained "certified" dispatchers who can go to work immediately. We are in the process of promoting one supervisor on the midnight shift. From January 1, 2000 to September 30, 2000 the Communications Section handled one thousand four hundred and seventy (1,470) Emergency Medical Dispatch calls. ~~- ..- "' ~~ Zvi ;~ ~i ' ~~.;:~ . A NATIONALLY ACCREDITED AGENCY ~. - t ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ... AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER. MEETING DATE: November 14, 2000. AGENDA ITEMS: Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investment and Portfolio Policy, as of October 31, 2000. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: BANKERS ACCEPTANCE: BRANCH BANKING &TRUST 3,945,811.94 3,945,811.94 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSITS: FIRST AMERICAN 100,000.00 SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA SAVINGS & LOAN 100,000.00 200,000.00 COMMERICAL PAPER: ALEX BROWN 1,982,992.77 BANK OF AMERICA 984,711.11 BRANCH BANKING &TRUST 981,904.17 PAINE-WEBBER 3,943,455.56 SUNTRUST 3,035,011.76 WACHOVIA 5,111,217.34 16,039,292.71 LOCAL GOVT INVESTMENT POOL: GENERAL FUND 8,172,866.17 RESOURCE AUTHORITY 1,954,700.65 10,127,566.82 MONEY MARKET: SUNTRUST 1,005,560.09 FIRST UNION 2,140,168.53 PAINE-WEBBER 1,574,725.82 4,720,454.44 CASH INVESTMENTS: SUNTRUST LB&T MENTOR MENTOR WACHOVIA TOTAL (GEN. OPER) (RES. AUTH.) 15,269,851.20 3,320,033.51 5,564,048.87 5,914,752.13 2,430,291.17 32,498,976.88 67,532,102.79 Pg 1 of 2 ' 4 ACTION NO ITEM NUMBER N-`~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER. MEETING DATE: November 14, 2000. AGENDA ITEMS: Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investment and Portfolio Policy, as of October 31, 2000. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Respectfully Submitted. by j!~ __ ,. L Alfred C. Anderson County Treasurer Approved by: ~4 Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION Approved ()Motion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To () Church Johnson McNamara Minnix Nickens VOTE No Yes Abs Pg2of2 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~'"°`~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 14, 2000 AGENDA ITEM: Work Session on the School Six Year Improvement Plan for 2000 - 2006 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: At the October 10, 2000 meeting, the Board of Supervisors requested a work session with the school administration on the Six-Year School Improvement Plan. Included with your agenda packet is a copy of the plan. The plan was developed by a ten member steering committee with input from other school staff and community and business leaders. It addresses such issues as instruction, human resources, health and safety, community relations, facilities and operations, technology and budget and finance. At the work session, Lorraine Lange, chairman of the steering committee, will present an overview of the six year improvement plan. Present to answer questions that the Board may have will be Dr. Linda Weber, School Superintendent; Jim Gallion, Assistant School Superintendent; Tom Hall, Human Resources; Richard Flora, Facilities and Operations; Penny Hodge, Budget and Finance; Jane James, Technology; and Pat Radcliffe, Pupil Personnel. Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Motion by: VOTE No. Yes Abs Church _ _ Johnson McNamara- _ _ Minnix _ _ _ Nickens 0 0 0 U U GA a E"'i 0 O O O a U Z V1 w w ~ a ~ ~ 0 N O 0 O ~ O N y ~,y~,0a 3 0 0 O N w E-i W c1~00 LS ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n x x ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ a ~ o ~ ~ ~ m ~' ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d a p ~ .~5 ~. (TQ ~ ~~ ,,,d ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ O O. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vi to to -P ~P ~ w N N ~.-• ~-• ~ ~ •-~ ~' . v~ w N J v~ ~ vi ~ ~ ~ w N N ~--~ O c~, ~ w . -., y a' ... 0 n 0 C d .r. k `C w ~s 0 0 •~ 0 c c~ b N 0 0 ~_ Y ~~ ~' a. 0 b c~ ., 0 c~ d ~, C" 0 ~~ r a ~~ v~ Q. c~ 0 ~, .-. 0 d a ~~ ~~ a. d r a w x ~' n 0 a o' ... 0 ~ o o~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ as ~' x ~ 0 ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ n co ~ o ~ c ~ d ~ A C n °o ~ ~ ... ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c 0 ~ o ~ ~ 0 a ~. w ., 0 0 '~ ~, 0 c c~ c~ w ~ ~ ~UQ N n ~ ~ n n b~ cra c~ BCD ~dC~n~C~~' boo ~aao ~ • ~ oC7 o c ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CD ¢' ''h ~ ~ O (D C t].. ~ C ~ "~ o ~ C" d ~„ O t=i ~ v, (~ `~ ~ • ~ n O 'C cD b "~'~ ~ ~ Q- ( N r ' O CD (gyp p ~ ~ O n ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~• b~ n~ 0 0 ~O-h ~ p C O ~ l~ 0 'r ~ O ~ ~ ~. ~ a ~ ~ ~ °o ~' ~ ~ ~ a ~' ~ ~ a v~o ~ ~; p ~ ~ ~ ~ G~ ~ ,~ ~' ~ ~ ~ a. o ~ ~ ~. 0 ~ do ~ c`C ~~d~d~ d o l~ ~7~1~ N ~ ~ ~,~c.~ ~ ~. ~.~ ~.. ~ ~ ~ ' ¢. ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ `b ~ *~ ~°- to ~ cu ~ cu ~ ~ cro ~ ~ c~ o o ~ ~ ~ ~ ¢, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~; ~ ~ ,~ ~ cro ~ Cn o ~•~~. ~oo ,ma c ~ ,., off.°~• ~~~~~ ~• ~ ~~~ .... a a ~ ~ < ~ • d o v~~ .. y . ~ ~ ~, ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ d ~~,~p ~~ ~; m ~~ ~ ~ v~ U' ~; " ~ a ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~. ¢, cra c~ ~. 0 ^t 0 C b D 7~ 0 0 0 0 c b v, ~ ~~, x ~c ~ x d ~a ~ r° o o ~ o ~ ~ ~ o ~. ~ ~ o d ~+ n .. ~ ~, o tc ~~ ~ o ~. ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ b b ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ z ~ ~ ~ ~ `~ ~ . o a `° ,~ o ~ d ~• ~ 0 0 o ~ o ~. a ~ ~- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~. °~ ~ ~ o o ~ ~ ~~ o ... o ~ nr o ~• y~ ~ ~ ~ c~td o ~: ~ d ~ ~ z ntd o ~. CD ' n ~ ~ ~ ~. .~ n r' ~ CD ~ ~ N o O ~ "'~ ' .S' ~ .. ~ ~ "' ~ ~ ~ Q A~ , ~ ~ N ~ C~ ~ ~ CD `C ~-t ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ('~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CD n O vi ~ ~, d `~ ~ ,.~ N n cv b ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ a ~ c ~. ~ o o a o . ~ ~... 0 .~ n O O .~ 0 ~~ o~~~x~~~~~~a~r~a~~ ~zx~~ ~z~~ a ~. ~ C ~ o x ~c CD Cr1 Cri x ~ ~i ~ ~ x ~ ~ A~. ~: ~ ~ x cia' ~ ~ u CD ~ ~ o ~ u u m Cri u ~ ~' ~ Q" a ~c ~ ~' ¢' ~ ~ x ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u ~ ~ ~ ~* ~ CD ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ b ~ncnd~7~~rnrn`~dr~d zdz~x xn~ '~ ~~ ~ ~~~~y"~ ~'~~o ~ C~~ Gig Crime ~x~ ~ ~ ~o o ~ ~ y ~ • ~ ~ '"_' coo ;~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o `' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ n ~. O y Cr 0 0 .r b ... a 0 x ., 0 0 •~ 0 C cD cn b ,.._, P~ J ~ C ~' ~ (CD ~ ~ ~ .~~.. ~ ~ O ~ n ~ ~ ~ '~' ~ ~' ~ ~ ('~ N G ~ ~ CC1 a' a°'. ~ n n z ~ cn "" ~ a. x c¢D ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ .y -~+ ~ ~ ~ C/~ ~ ~ ~ ~' sv b~ a' ~' z ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ C ~ x ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' x ~ ~ ~ A O .. n ~ ~ d ~ 7~ o `-' ~ d ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ 7~ b ` ~ ~ ' ' v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C C x' C n p x' p ~ ... , `~ ~ ~ CI 'ri ~. Q.. ~ G ~ ¢. cu ~ ~ cu ~' ~ . c ~ C ~ r ~ O ' ~ ~ ~' `~' ' ~' C D p ~ ~ r-3 G - ~ . n ~ O „ ! e ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ o ~ z o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ x ~ ~ A ~ l 1 C D ^ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ^ , 1 i C~ ~G ~ ~-y ~--~ r,i ~ A~ ~n ~ ' ~"" ~ ~ ~ ~ C~ N "~' ~' ~ O ~t '~ n ~ ~ ~ O ~ . .. ~ ~ . G . clq `C CD ~ ~~.. ~ ~. CD N ~ C~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N -+ I--I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ' ~ ~ P~ "r ''i C .' 3 • ~ r-. ~ '~ ~ ~ ` U Q ' ~ ~ n CD ~• C/~ n O O r b "S r.• CY A -.. "~ A7 y r. ~_ A• A~. `C CD W ~t C/~ n r"'Y O O --~ `~ ~t O C CD b ~rJ C~ ~ 'b cu ~ o ~ O ~, ~ o c o ~ ~, ~ ~ o ~ b ~ ~ ~ ~~ N n x CD ~ ~ r ~ G7 ~ ~ C ~ G~ ~ ~~, ~ ~ ~ n o ~ ~ ~ r CD ~• ~ D' ~. r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d ~ ~ . td ~ o ~• ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' o ~ o ° ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o Q ~ .. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~• ~ ~. ~. ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ ' a ri ~ ~ c ., , ~'~ ¢ ~ ~ ~ o b c u c u c v ~ ~. b A~ ..~ X ~C co n n 0 O ~-. r-i 'L~ O C CD b ~~~~~ ~ ~ o ~• ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~~~~~ ~'•, ~ CD ~ o ~ ~ o ~ ~ c~ o ~ ~ ~• ~,o a-~ ~ ~'~'~ '~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 ° ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~- .~ 0 0 ~ c ~_ ~ ~ a' co o ~ ; a- ~ ~ o ~ • ~., ~ A.~ ~~o ~'~ ~ ~ ~~~... ~ ~ c~ a ~ ~• ~.~do 0 ~.~ ~ ~ ~- 'd co ?~ cu ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ x ?' c~ ~ n ~ ~~'~ n ~ ~_ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ C7 ~ o, ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~' o '"_ a. ~ y v C ~ '-~ cD ~ N "~ C. r* C/~ N N o ~,' ~ Q.. ~ ~C ~ ? ~' ~ b ~ ~ ~° ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ a. ~ ~ ~ ., ~ o ~° ~n .... ... c~y~~ xx~ ~ ~ ~ o cu ~ v, ~. ~ o ~ ' ~~ ~ r o ~ a ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ a,.0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;~ ~. ' o ~ ~ C. ~ ~ cu ... c~ ~ ~. ~. ~ ~~~~ ~ ~. ~ ¢, ~, ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~'~•~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~~•~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ o ~ o ~+ CD ~, c •~ ~~~ a- ~ ~ ~. ~' o v~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o 0 ~n ~- ~~ ~ c=> ~' ~ ~ a.° ~'C ~ ~ ~. ~. ~ n a. cro ~ ~ ~ b ~ ~* o ~ a' c~ ~_ ~ ~' ~- ~ ~ ~ o ~ o ~ ?' o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~a.o ~' yC' ~ o ~ .C ~ ~" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q-' ~~ ~ `.~ ~ ~ ~ C C ~• ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,..~ a ~ ~ w `~ CD a .~ ~• ~ o ~' ~ 6: ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a. w 0 0 ~s a X (7 O O 0 c b 0 ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ =' ~ ~ at o ~ o ~ ~ `~ ~ ~ ?'' ~~ N ~ ~ p„ ~ w c"'o ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ hi ~, ~ o a ~ w ~ Y Y 'b w ~ Y ~ '-' A.. ~ ~ o o ~ ~ ~ c o ~ •, ' S ~ 5 r» cu ~ o ~ ~ o d ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ d ~ ~ o ~ ~. ~ s ~ < ~ ° ., co ~ a , ~ • b o o ~ ~ o ~ ~ o y ~ Uq N ~ r' M N , 'L3 . ~ ~. o y x a a o ° ~ ~, ~ y ~ o ~ ~ o o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~~ ~~ ~ d d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y ~ ~ ~. y o 0 ~ ° ~ G ~ 5 o ~ ~ o Cr1 a r a H z° ?~ 0 0 0 c~ ~d :p w N ;~ ~ ~ ... ,,, ~ y v~ .~.. O ~ ~ ~ a S ~ . ~. ~ a y ~ ~ ~ ~ ° o ~ ~ ~ o o ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ~°n ¢- o ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ c~u ~ c~v o o o ~ o c~ ~ r° ~ ~~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CD ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ o o a o CD o ~ ° ~' o ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~• ~ ~ ~ ~ ~• °° ~ ~ ~ o ~ `r ~ ~ ?r ~ a. ~ ~ ~ ..,. ~ ~ ~' ~ ~: ~ ~ . ~ cu r ~ .r. ~ o ~ ~ ~• C ~ ~ a ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~. c~ cn ~. n cu r ~~ C~ ~ ~ ~ H ~ ~ ~ r' L/~ r O fD n N ~ O ~ O ~. O ~-' N ~ O ~ O n O~ ~ O ~-.. CD b ~ ~. A~ ~ ~ ~ c~ n 0 0 '~ 0 C cv co b P~ N 0 co a. ~, ~' ~e ~• ~. ~~ ~O ~ cr~a ~ ~, o ¢, 04 ~*. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ a. o ~ ~. o ~. a: ~ co ~ ~ co 0 ~' ~ 0 0 ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~, ~. ~~ o ~' ~ ~ c~.. co ~ co ~ ~ ~. ~ ~. ~. o o' ~ '~ ~--• ,.~ r* ~ ~. ~' O ~' C ~ ~ n ~ ~ o va 7 ~ o a. n ~ O ~C ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ °o co ~. ~ ~ o ~ co 0 ~-n 0 w o~ ~. ~' O o x ~ ~ c o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a. • Q, ~ ~ v~ o ~ ' ~ ~ ~ `~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ 0 0 v, o ~ ~ `~ o ~ ~ ~ n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~' ~, w ~ cu o ~ ~ ~. , ~ ~. ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ a. ~' ~ °, ~ . o ~, ~ ~ ° ... ~ ,~ a• o ~. ~ o ~ ° ~ `~-. , o w c '-' as ~ a. ~ ~ ~. ~ ~. ~ ~~ o . ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ ¢' ~ ~ coo ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ?? ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~c a. ~ ~ Q. o ~ o ~ oa ~ c o ~ ~ ~-n ~ ~ a: ' ~ ~ ¢, ~ ~ o ~ ~ '~ o ° ~. ¢. ~ .~ ' '~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ u ~c ° ~ ~ a. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~,~ `d ~ w ~ cD . C n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ !O~ ~ n ~ D a' ''" ~--~ A ~ ~ ~ ~ . . CD C D ~ ~.. ~ ~ o ¢ ~' c~ ~ o + ~ . ~ ~ c1. ~ ~ `~ ¢' ~ co ~- co ~ ~ o '~ o ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ , ' ~ ~ ~' ~~ ~ oa ~' , ~ ~ a ~ ' ~ Q? ¢. co ~ • ~ co n ~ C ~ ~ ~ U Q 0 co n 0 0 •~ 0 c co b w o ~ ~d ~' ~ C CD .+. CND `~ ~ O pi ~ ~ n ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ 0~4 py ~ F~-h ~ `~ ~'• O O ~ c~i~ ~ ~~ ~• ~ .-• ... A~ '~ ~ ~ ~~ O '-" ~ ~ t-t, O G ~-t N ~ N O ~ ~ O O ,..t CD ~. ~ O ~ ~ O ~ ~"~' CD ~ a a°~ CD ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ Q- o c~ a. ... n cD 0 o 0 ~. n A~ O ~' N C~~s' 0 O (JQ O "CS O C ,.... ~• O QQ CD O Q.. CD ~' 00 0 cD a. w ~. cD c~ ~. c c~ c~ 0 0 0 b w .A m '~ 0 oV 0 ~ y Cn a, ~ =° ~' ~'. ~ co 0 ~ ~ b o '~ ~ ~. 0 bs ~v O• ~. o ~ o °o °o a, O ~p ~ ~ O ~ cD ~ ~ n b 0 O n O' ~_ Q, n Q 0 h~+ F•+ ~--+ i--~ ~"' n W N ~ UQ O d ~a ~• ~ n C ~ ~~ ~ ~ n ~ ~ ~ (TQ ~ ~ ~ D y ( a A~ O ~~ 7 a a ~~ ~ O O cv ~ co ~ cv ~ ~ a o ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~,' ~ ~ o Q. ~. 0 o ~~ ~ ~y ~' _ ~CD ~ ~ yb ~ ~y C7 ~ o o ' o cs ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~' ~ o ~ ~ c ~o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ tS ~ O ~ Q..~sv .-. ~ c n ~ ~~. ~u co c o ~ ~ G c O ~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ . . co ~ ~ o a, ~ ~ ~ ~ ci ~ o ~ ~ a- o ~ ~ ~ „~.~ ~ o ~ o c~u ~ c~ ° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o w ~ ~ d o ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ¢. ~* C O ,~ '~ ~ ~. ~" ... ~ co ~, ti, cD S~ O ti ~ ~ ' O ~ ~ ~ ~7 ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ n O (1Q C O O O O ~ ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O n ~ ~. ~ O n M ~~'h ~ ~, ~ ~ N ~ ~ ,. n ~ n ~ f* b N O crc ~ ~. o ,^~, Q, ~ ~-+~ O ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o t, ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n ~ a. O ~ ° ~ o ~ ~ o '. ' ~ ti o. A r• ~~ fD y ~• A'+ ~+ O n A'+ A~ r~ a. a e 0 io' C 0 C/] X s' O O 0 c~ b v, ~-+ W ~ ~ W „~ ~--+ C~D V] N CD ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ '~ ~C ~ C `~ ~~ 0 o o ~ o Q., o c~ o c~ ~' ~ c~ ~ x ~. ~• .~ c O ~ ~ a ~. cra ~ ... ~ ~ ~ o' ~ ~ ~ o O ~ ~ .~ a~ c, ~ o ~. o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CD ,~.r Q- a. 0 0 c~ c~ ~' 0 0 ~ ~ '~ ~ o °q ~ `-• 0 ~. b~~ ~- ~' ~ o o ~ ~ o '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ° b~ ~~ 0 b ~. n O o ~ ~~ s ~ o 0 ti c~ c`~o ~d 0 c co 0 0 0 v' y ~~ ~_ N O 0 ~ ~ '~ a, :-. 0 ~ ~ w ~ o ~ ~ o Q o ~ ~. b `° ti, o ~ ~ b ~: ~ o ~. ~ `r b " o ~ ~ ~~ 0 o' ti i w y ~ ~. ~' . ~ tic c~.. c c~ 0 ~, '~ O ~ o a- ~ ~ 0 C, a. ?' c~ ao `~ O ~' ~' r' 0 0 ~, N W lD c~ p. ~~ b ~ o ~ ~ o ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ •. 0 ~. s• ~. ~,, CAD ~ ~~ ~ ^. ~ o x c~ ~~ N ¢.. c' ~' b~ y C~ trq~ ~ ~. "•' S ~ ~ ~ ~- Q.. a o ~ o c s' ~' ~ ~; 0 0 N N ~. '~ ~ ~ a °~ t~. pi ~ ~ "'t O ~~~ c~ ~ ~b o' '~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ 0 ~ ~- ~ ~. c~ o ~ O c ~ ~' o ~°n ~ ~ ti, ~ A, a. ~ ~. ~' o' 0 O.. ~ y d4 ~ ~ ~ ~• ~ ~ o 0 0 0 0 0 N ~--~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~? d cu fro a ~~ ~~ ~. ~' co o ~ o CD cro a~ a. ~. ~ a ~~ c~ ~ ~ c 0 0 o ~ ~ ~ ua ~• ~ o ~ ~ a. ~. u°~o 0 ~ ~ o Q. c~ ~ c~ ~ o ~'' ~~ ~ O a~ a ~ ~ ~ ~. o ~ ~' o' `C C O n A~ n N N n O c~ 0 ~n a o_ vo w 0 a a4 ua c~ a. 0 ~. ~, ?~ 0 0 •~ 0 C c~ b rn N N F-+ ~ v, ~ ~ '! ~D N N N '-' ~ "" W N "' (TQ fD C ".3 ... pi ',~ C3 ''d ~ (D ~ ~ a ~ ~' n C• ¢, ~ ~ ~ ~ o. ~, ~h ;s' QQ A7 ~ v ~ p ~ ~ ~ R7 i a~ . ~ ~ y ~ y .-~ ~ N ~ ~ y n ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ y ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y a. ~ p o ~ ~. ~ ~' ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ CD o ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ °~ ., ~ o °~ ° ~ o ~ °~ ~ ~ o ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o , < ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ara ~ ti . ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ o ~ s ''' o ors cu o ~. ' ~ o ~. ~ o ~ ~~ A* ' o ~ ~ ~~ rs ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~* fD ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ b o ~o `" o oo , a o ~ . o o o ~. c ° o ~ ,~ ~. o 0 o cu ~ y ~ o 0 ~~ ~ ~ b ~ c~u ~• ~ ~ p~ ~ ~ ~ p C ° °~ , . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~* `17 ~" O fD A~ ~ ~, ~, ~ O p+ '"'~ ~ ~ O V] ~ ~. ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ A, O~Q p ~ cep ~• ~ '~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ o ' :~. ~ ~ ~ ~ •~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~.. o ~ ~ a, N ~' ~' '~ 't3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r N ~. cD ~ C ~ v~ ~ ~ ,~_.. CAD ~ N ~ '_' O -~h • O A ~ O ~ ~, O ~ ~ n C ~ CAD ~--~ ~ ~ CD ~ ~ ,nom. O `~ ~ ~ `•" ~ p ~ R. (D W N CD [ij '~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~].. O ~ ~. o ,~ ~. ~ o ~ a. ~, ~ ~ v~' '~ c~ ~ ~ ~ Q. o ° o ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ A~ ~ O O ~ O ~, `C~ `L7 O ~ G ~. ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ o ~ pi A~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ A~ ~~'h N p '"~ CAD ~ ~ O N '~.'h `C3 '* O p cu c~ 0 c~ c~ n N O O ~ ~ y ~' ~ ~ :~ ~ m '~ ~o 0 b ~ O ~ o o ~ ~' ~ ~~. o0 ~ ~ tea, O~ ti, ~_ S ~. ~_ ~7 n O~ X c~ ?; n O O_ r-i `C O C O b J N tJ N ~ N N ~ .-r ;__, U~Q ~ ~ b C~ ~' C CD ~ ~-' ,.r ~ G y y ~ a ~ ~ a (D ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~-' • "'~ n .y '~ n N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~QiyC'~~•° :tiRy'yC~:v~~3G)?' ~C~',r37~;Ryb~'~]~ a:ro~'~a~ co ~ ~--. ~p ~ ~+ ~• cp ~ cp to ~ ~ v~ co ~ cn co a.~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~bpaA'm ~U~obpgA'c~o ~bpga'c~o~~cq'o~sZ'~tia•o O ~ '" (j • ~ '~ O t0 ~ CD O (0 `~' '~ ~ O c0 H n O N '.~ S •-r `~ ~ A~ f0 ~ ~ (0 ~ ~ ~ t0 C7 ~, r-r ~'~i ~ ry '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ oq ~. O ~ ~ ~, a ~ .~, ~ o ~ ~ ~. o' A °° ~' O ~ o ~ do ~• ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ¢, ~ ~' ~ ~. ~ CD ~" ~ R, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CD ~ O ~ n ',~ S ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O O ~~ ~ ~ ~~ o b ~•b ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ }~ C/~ ~ ~ ~ ~ tIi N .C ~ ~ ~ ~, A~ C~ O ~„ O ~ n ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ UQ n ~ ~ • Q-' v' O ~ 's "'a • b ~ ~. ~ ~. b ~ ~ ~• ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ~ `~' ~ c o CD 0 k ~C CD C/~ n ~" O O 0 c b N W N rrJ i.a ~ N W N ..-~ b ~ ~" c~ p ~ '~ , ~ ~ n ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ a o ~ ~' ~ ~' `~~. ~ `DQ.. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° , , o ~ a, ~' ~ ~ ~. ~ ~'-' cu te ~ V ~ ~ N ~ .~C ~ p Q.. ~ ~ ~ (0 ~S ~ ~ ~ ~+ CD O N c O ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ o ~ ~ ~ n ~ ~ ~ ~; o `~ o ~ • va ~ ~ o~ ' ~ ~. ~ ~ ac o ao ~ ~ , co uo . O• S ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ (~D ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ O O ~ ~ ¢: ~ ~s ~ ~ ~ ~ r- ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ N n ~• ~ ~ '~. O n ~ ~ r'f ~"'1 ('p O' b ~ ~, ~ ~. ~ o ~. o ~ o ~. 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, . o ~ ~ ~ ~. o ' ~ ~ ~ ~ S ^~ (0 O H O ~ ~ ~• 0 n O~ b 0 b~ ~" N N N N N N N :A w ~ ~ ~ ( D ~ ~ C O cn C A~ a- ~ w ~. a o~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~. ~ • y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ cu ~ ~ y ~ o Co ~o c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ cu `~ ~ ~ o °~ ~ w ~ ~ o °~ ~ o ~ ~ tp ~ ~ ~ ~ t0 "~~' • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~• ~ ~ o c~ ~ ... o •~ a o o `~ o o ~~ ~ O o~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~-n o a. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ?.~ x ~ •~ ti ~• do `c ~ c`o ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~• cu ~. • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O. n ~ ~ O. A G cn o n ,~.,~ ~ ~s n O c o c 0 ~ co ~ O co ~ N n • ccoo (D N co n co ~ co C ~ _ CO ~ O ~ ~ `O O ~ 0 ~ ~ l~ ~"'~ n 1- ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~-~ ~ ~• ~ Q `3 ~ ~ ~Q ~'! b o a ~ ~ ~ o ~ ¢' c ~, ~ ~ ~ 0 Q ° o ~ ~ ~ - O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ b ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ¢, ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ° ~ ~ 0 C/~ '"S In I~ Q 0 I~ 0 c ~. b N ~A N a 0 ~. 0 b d 0 C~ co cn ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. O r' ~ OV ~ ~ ~ b CD ~p ~ ~ ~ ~ CD ' O CD .fl C ~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~~ Q n ~ ry. ,~~ `" Uj ~-. • 'b ,b ~ ~ o' p ~ ~ ~ '~~' S ~ O O ~ ~ CD ~ ~ ~ o ~ o ~ ~' o ~ ~ b ~' 0 ~ y ~ ~ °q~ `~ 0 0 ~. ~ fD ~ N ~ dr n O ~ O ~ O ~ ~ ~ .. ~ ~ ~ y ~ ~ _ ~' ~ c~' O ~ ~ S ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~. "' `b S ~• S ~. o ,~°~ ~ ~? ~• ~ ~' °q o ~. n O~ N A N b :? p "' ,C.. ~. (~ ~. o ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~~ o. ~. ~~ ~~o ., ~~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~~'~ °<'~ dQ ~, x' ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ (0 r+~ CD ~ ~ ~ ~ N ¢. M CD ,"~'-r ry ~ f7 O ;r ~ Q ~ d O ~ O. G ~ n n ~ ~~ O O ~ ~ ~ C ~ A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ¢, ~. a, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ °c ~ c o ~ o ~ ¢' " i.. ~ ~ ~ N O ~ n ~ ~ ~. O n ~ ~ ~ ~' O A~ O ~ ~ ;-~ O ~ o '~ ~ ~ o ~• ~ ~. m N w W ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~y a ~-dam, ~ O ~ `~ ~ A~ '-+ ~ A~ ~ 'ZS < O O ~ co (D ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~O-h (D O ` ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ '' ~. - ' . C3 O ~ ~ ' ~ ~ n ~. ~ b ~ ~ 9 ~ tb ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O 0Q C~ ~ O ~' v O ~ O p ~ ~ ''*~ O O '"'~ O dq C~ O cam. ~ ~ ~ ~Q 0 c¢D ~ ~ ~ 0 'b ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ s ~ ~ ~ ~ O" ' ~ = co S m QQ ~. ~ ~ `' ~ ~ dq ~. O ~' ¢' n O ti ~ ti ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~• ~ ~ ~ ti ~ ~ n bo ~ o ba ~ ~ ~ ~ ~• ~ o ~ ~ o '~ ~ ° ~ o ~ ~ o o ~ ~ sa' ~ ~= ¢. cu o ~ ~ ~' ~o ~ ~ ~ ~o ~ b ~ ° ~ b ' ~~ ~ ~ ti~ O ~. ~ ~ o ~ , ~ t~ y C'~ ~ ~-. ~ ~ ~ ti ~. ~ 0 O CD s9 ~ ~ ~ O p4 O O O ~. Oq CU ~ ~. ~~ ~ ~. ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ L]. O ~ .-. O n ~n n ,3" cu n `~~' ~• r+ ~n n `C CD n ::s' O O ., 0 c N O ~ ~~ m 0 n 0 O A O w ~--. ~--~ a ~ C iu ~ '~ A~ n UQ ~ n ~• ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. y~~ N' ~• o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ti~ ~~ ~ O. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. O ~ °r p- o a. ~ ~a ~• ~., o. ~ ~ ~ ~ ti~~~~ O ~• n ~' ti ~ O O~ O ~--~ CD ~ O ~. ~ ~• O ~ ~ ~ ~. a. 0 ~_ c' R. O t~ c.., O O W i-+ W d C ~.. O "O A'+ C ... C ~s c n A~ ~• n ~. O ."5 D a ^t -d fD n O t9 C3 C' A~ C3 A as is 0 Cs N N ~ .A ~ w A" ~ ~ ' c cu o o c ~• n ~. o ~ ~ O ~ ~ `~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c~ O cn ~ ~ cn C ., .., • ~u ~ ~ `~ ~ UQ ~ ~ ~ y a ~ ~ ~y ~ ~ r~ ~ ~ ~y ~-. . n ~ o ~ ~ `~' ~ ~ . ti ~ ~ `C ~ c o ( ~D O ~ (0 CD N ~ ~ ~ f0 N ~ ~ R ~ ~~., ~ C ~ ~ ~ CD ~ :° ' ~ ~' ~ o c~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `*' ~ `~. Oo o C N N ~ ~ ,~ ~ ¢' .~, ~ o-0 S 6 q ~ O ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~t O ~ CD (jq `~ ~ ~ n ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ '~ A ~ ' ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ a C D ~ C D C D ti `ZS ~~ ~ O • O (1Q o ~h ~ ~ A'- ~ ~ ~ O o ~ w c A. ~ o ~' ors ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~', . c~ ~ ti n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ° ~ ~ o ~ ,~ ~ ~. ~ "~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ a ~ ~• ~ c~ ~ ~ ~C~ . ~ ~ U Q ~ O ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C a co CAD r' 0 CD CD UQ CD C O n `~ c~ c~ a. c~ ~a 0 `C c~ ¢. 0 0 0 C cu 'til N ~--~ w tJ w w ~ ~ w w ~'' N ;__, ~ , ~ :p w N O N ~ N O `~ ~ O ~ `d r--~ n vcni .-. '.S• ~ `'~ N P~ v"~i BAs Q' '~~. vii ~ ~--. ~ CD ~ ~ ~ ~ '"" ~ C/1 !'S (~ ~/ ~, ice" ~j-+ F+. ~j+ C/~ ~ ~~ ~ ~• ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~•O ~ ~ n ~ N ~ N ~C C7 O (gyp '•~ ~ CAD ~ N ¢, vi ~ ~ ~ ~ ~• ~ O b pq~' can ~ .a ?: p • ~ a, ~ ~' • C7 ~ A, ~ ~ O ~ ~' ~ ~C ~° C • ~ f~0 c+ ~ ~ ;ti N ~ N "~~~.' ~ ~ ~ UQ ~, ~' ~ N ~• ~ `ti ter. ~ ~ N "~'~ '~~' O ~ ~ coo cCDO ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ OOQ ~ O ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~*, as ~ ~ o a ~ ~ ~ o o' ~ o a. o o ~ ~ o dQ O ~ _~ '~ ~ ~ p ~ ~ f~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ C. ~ ~ 00 Q' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~. ~ ~ vA~i can ;~ O ~ ~ ,_, O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a. ~ ~ ~ o a O cn S W ~' .~ rn ~' ~ ~ `C ~ ~ n O ~, N ~ ^' N cn ~ '~ p' ~ ~. <• ~ ~ p• ~ n '~• C• v, ~. ~ ~ p., or4 ,_, ~-. ~-. ~ ¢' ~ O .- ~ ~ c~ C/~ O O_ r-i 'tf O C (~ coo b N N ..~ CD O n cu O "C~ O O N n C CD (TQ "L~ n CD 0 O d .--~ C CD `C c~ n .-• b O O n A~ O O D 0 CD a. A~ `~'"~' 0 ~+ (7 0 c~ c~ N A~ O O ~--h n O (iQ `C ~ ~ Cf R. ~ o C1 ~ 0~Q n fD "r3"' "~ b "' ~ O O M ~, ~ O ~ ~ "! ,~„ O A ,`"y ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ A ~ ~ S ~. ~ ~ 0 A'+ ~ A ~' ~ ~ D O ~ ~ ~~ ~• o gc b ~ ~. ~ ~ y O ~. b ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s ^! ~- ~" "b "! "C3 A~ ^! A~ O rr7 Q. cD C O w N C~ C CAD ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ a ~ ~ ~ O m n ~ ~ ~ l~~D ~ ~ ~ ~ ti Q '~'*~ O ti O ~ O ' ~ A O ~ ~ b ~. ~ o ~ `O ~ ~ °, s o ~ ti C cu O ''C7 C~D b y ~ a. ~ o G ~ S' n t0 ~ N ~ ~~ ~ ~. Oq N O 0 0 w N i~ "' ~ `~ ~ C9 ~ CD A~ Q.. ~• C O ~p ~ •-' ,~ O ~ '~ (~ O ~ ~ ~ ~_ ~ ~ a~ C o . S ~. ~, . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ o b •~ ~ ~. ..• ~ ~ ~ ~ ~-+ ~ C a: s .~ ~_ ti (~ O O G _~ W Q.. r~ CD A~ CD b aQ~' f0 ~,. O O 0 w N C CD f~ CD ~ ~ O y b coo ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ O pP~ CAD •~ ~' ~ ~ ~ Q" O ~ N N ~ ~ O ~ ~ CD ~~ '~ . R. O C ~ tr~ y`~ ~ O b ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O N ~ O ~ t0 `d 'ZS ~. ~' ~ ~ ~; ~ ~ ~ ~ C C . ~ 'L7 ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ coo ~ `~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (p b '„ ~ ti O ~ ~ °o w ~ ~ ~, ~. ~• o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~• o ~ ~. ~ o ~ ti ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, O 'C~ Cl.. ~ `~ CD ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ n C O ~p ~. "` ~ ~ • ~ ¢' O w N w d cn C CD O '~ C c~ O ~ ~ a. ~ ~ ~ O ~. ~_ ~. ~ ~ 'L7 ~ 0 n ~ O ~ O O S ~ ~ti ~~ ~~ ~' ti X c~ C/~ n ~' O O '~ O C CD b A~ N W .P ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w N p C ~ ~ ~ '~ pi CD ~ ~ rn n ~ C A~ ~ ~. G n P~ ~ ~ ~ , ~' ~ ~ co , ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N o n ~ ~ ~ co ~ ~ ~ ~ G ~.~O~ y [r7 ~ ~.b ~N3 C CrJ R~ C~'yCr1 ~ ~ ~'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~] ~ ~ ~y ~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ D CS' ( `c ~ co 'ts ~ ~ ~. co 'b ( D ~ ~' ~ cp 'Zs c ~ '~ ~ ~ ; ~' ~ o ~ '~ v, cu co ~ ~- • uc ~ a ~ ~ ~ ' U o •~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ c~ o ~ ~ ¢ o ~ s ~ ~. o ~ o ~ . ~ ~ o s ~, ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ `° o ~ s v' ~ . C ~ o ~ ~ rn ~ ~ A~ ~' `"~~ (D O ~ ~ a' c ~ ~. ~ ~ ~. '' ° ° o ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ o cv ~ Q.. ¢. cu cco b~ ~ ~ ~ b ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ s ~' ~~ ~~•s ~ s O o b~;0 ~ c~ ~ ~' m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ voo ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ° ~ ~ ~ ' ~ y• ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o s `~ ~ o ~ ~ o ~ s, ~ ' o 0 0 ~ ~. cu x s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° o ~ s' ~ c o ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ o ~ ow . , ,rt o cu .,. ~ ~ ~ ~ a~, ~ o ~ o' o ~ ~. ~ ~ o o '~ o ~ '~ ~ s o o ~~ o o~ r--. S• ~. ~ ~• a CD ~ ~• ~ ~. or ~' ao ~ ~ ° ~ o ~ n o~ c~ a p~ ~. C ti ~ ~" c~ ' cn ~ c~ ~ ' ~ ~ R ~-* p ~ A~ c~ •.-. o o ~• ~• o ~. ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ oa ~ ~ ~ ~ w r~ cu c~ ~; ~' 0 0 "~ O c c~ c~ b N ~ y a, ~ ~ ~ ~o ~. co O tv 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ c~ c~'o ¢- ~ cn O '~* ~ ~ (1Q n ~ O o ~ ~ ~ ~ m o ~ oa ~ ~ ~ ~ n ~ ~ ~~~~~ a. ~ c~ ~ o a. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~•°nb o~~~~' m :; o 0 0 ~ ~ y ~ ~ x ~' °, o 0 ~ ~. ~ p ~. ~ •-. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ¢. o ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ o ~' ~, ~, ~,. a. cu ~ O ~ ~ A~ ~ ~ ~ (D ~ y ~ oar' ~ o ~o ~ ~ ¢. co 0 ~-n 0 o a. ~ ~ ~ ~~ o c~ c~ ., a 0 0 ~' c~ 0 ~. Q' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~• ~ o ~ ~ O~Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~" 0 ~A. b ~ c~ ~ ~ ~. co h ~ o' ~ ~" a. ~• ~ ~ ~ b ~ ~ c "' 0 ~• ~ °, o ~; ~_ ~ b ~. m ~ o oa ~ ~~ n O ~ ~ O ~- O y m c~'„ °o °o ° o ~~ ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~' °, ~ ~ ~ ~ c~ 0 0 ~ ~ ~ b ~. ~ o c~ ~ ~~ !-# co ~~ ~ ~ O ~ O ~~ ~ y ~~ ~~ s. bs ~v 0 0 0 a, b •~ C. ~ ~ ~ A~ .. ~ .fl CrJ ~ ~b ~ ~ o o ~ ~ N ~'. co a ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ . 0 ~ ~ d ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ '~ °~ c~ c' ~ c~ ~ o 0 ~o-n ~ 0 vo ;c ti 0 0 0 0 ~ y A. ~ ~ ~ ~ ti ~. ~ ~ ~. o c~ ~ ~ '~ ~, ~ o Q- o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° o ~, c~ ~ ~~ '`~ ~ _ b ~ ~ o ~~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ o b ~. o o ¢' b ~ ~ O CD ~ C- O ~A. y ~. CD y ,,~ ~ ~ ~ s '~ d ~ A~ ~ C co ~. N `L7 ~ ~ o o ~ ~ a ~'• ~ n~ ~ v°a ~ ~~ o 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 0 ?t c~ 0 ~. c~ ~, c~ ¢.. O UQ A~ O~ O CAD 0 0 (JQ O ~_ c~ c~ 0 0 0 C cu C~D "d A~ "r-' N cn ~' ~ tJ F+ R+ b ~ C~ "' f D c!i ~ ~ ~^ ~' ~' _ p ~ v' ~ N ~--' W N ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ r-d ~ b ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~- O ~ n ~ n C' ~ n ~. ~. C cn ... C. ~ ~ ~ O ~" w p ~ O. c~D ~ ~. ~ ~ C c~'> '"r ~s ~ ~ "~ c' `'' a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' m 'b A. ~' ~ . cv ~ co ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ va ~ ~ ~ ~, can r"' ccu ° ~ '~ ~ ~ b ~ '~ ~ ..• ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ~ ° ~ ~ 'h ~ n ~ ~ U Q A ~ ~ 'y O ~ ~ ~ o n o ~ ~ ~ O '~ ~ ° •~ ra ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~ '~ ~. ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ c ~~ ~ ° oo ~ s~ a x~ ~~ ~ ~~° ~ ~°° ~ o ~ a o ~ ~~ o:°° b ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c '~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ uo ~, o o ~ ~ ~ ~ o o ~ ~. ~ ~° O~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~• R ~ ~• ~ ~ ti ~ b ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ do ~' ~ co n 't3 s ~ • ~ ° O ~ ~ ~ 'b s :; 0 ~ a oa '~ CD ~ '~ w r* "~ . o O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n ~ *'+ ~• ~ O. ~ "C7 C Q.. ,~~. ' ~ CD ~ 9 . `7 O ~ ~ `~ ~ ~ ~ " ,..F ~ y ~ ~~.,. ~ p+ cn ~! C w CD d ~ O ~• QQ ~, O C ~ • ~ ~ ~ ,~ O '7 ~ ~, O No .-~ ~--. ~' '~ 0 b O ~ •. ~ b ~ ~. ~ o ~~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ °_ h~ ~_ o' ~C CD C/] n ~"' O O_ r--i 'C O C CD N b N d1 ~ v, v, N N N ~ ~ W ~, ~ 7 ~' CD ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C. ¢t C• vii ~ ~ co ~ ~ co ~ cu 6" cn fD ~ .. • • ~'• ~ v' UQ O p. u• "~ (7 ~ "~i bey `' ~ ~ ~ ~~•~ ~yC7~ ~ ~y~ o v~y, o ~ib'y~ C~~ ~yb~ ~y ~ ~ ~ pq~' ~ o ~ 'b tea. ~ `,C ~ '~ gyp„ co C • '~ ~~, co ,~~ C . O ~ aaa' ~ G ~ O ~~ ~ ~ `d ~ ~ ~~ ~ '-'coo ~ ~ ~•~ ~ ~~ 6' ~ ~•~ CD p o~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ ~. O ~ C ~ O co O ~ 64 ~ ~ O• O co ~ O• ~ O ~' y~• O co ~. ~ A O O n ~ ~ p„ ~ c~D N n • ~ ~ O ~ dQ ~ O UQ ~ ~ vii ~ ~ O ~ N r •' `ti. ~ A~ co ~ O N co c> ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ o cio • ~, coo ;~ ~. ~. a. ~ ~ • o ~ coo ~ coo ~ S ~.. ~ ~- n ~ ~ CD ~ ~ a ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ O O ~' O • ~ . ~ O ~ ~ C/1 ~ ~ ~ ti O c0 O ~• (IQ A~ p `~' ~' ~C .' 3 UQ ~' Cr1 A~ `O ~ '~ C/~ Q- ~• ~ ~, O CAD ry O ~ ~ 6A ~ n p C ~ p n ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ N C~D O n~ ~ ~ ~ n ~ O ~• ~ ~ b n Q. ~ ~' ~ .-~ ~ N ~. ~ Q.. J ~ ~ '~ y tea. o ~ O S b~ .o m ~ ~ ~ 0 `ZS~ ~o ~' n o' w y ~ CD a ~ CD ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (~ ~ o o~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .-, ~ ~, ~ N O CD ~ ~ ~ ,.a N. n CAD ~" ~ CD ~ ~ ~ ~~ o ~ ~' r, °o~~ o ~ ~ ~ O O O_ ~ ~ qQ ~ ~ ~, 0 `~ o o ~ ~ ~ ~ o' ~• 0 ., 0 crc N b O G ~ N ~ CD O ~ ~ y o ~ ~ ~ '~ tea, ~ ~ o 0 0 0 co (0 d o ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ Q p ~ y ~' ~ "' ` ° o ¢' ~' 6R n ~ ~ ~ o a C c~' `C O a b b - ' ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ o a. s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~n ~-n ~ ~ ~ 0 0 ~ o o ~ ~ ~ ~ o , ~ c 5 c~ ~ ~ b Q- ~ N o~ rn rn N N N ~--' Cn ~ ~ a ~ ~• ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~- ~ • ., .... A~ ~ O ~ ~ y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ AO n ~ ~ ~`! ~' ~ W ~• ~ ~ ~ ~• ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~• ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ cbo cOO ~ Q., ~ ~ ~ ~ n 'C3 ~ ~ O .. "~ ~ r' ~ ~. o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~... a b o ~ ~ ~ ~ A ~ a (~D ~ ~ o ~ w ~ ~ ~ coo ~ ~'o ~~ o ~• o ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ `° ~ ~ ~_ ~ n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~. ~ ~ `C ~ ~ A~ '~ a. ". ~ ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~• ~ ° o ~ ~ ~ ~' ~. o ~ ~ ~• .O co a ~• o ~ ~ a p. ,~,~ n ~ O ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ a a' ~ i-.~ ~ ~• ~ ~ ~ ua „~ ~ rn °` ~ ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,... a ~ ~ ~• ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c¢D ~' ~ G-. Q. O. n ~ y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ OA ~ p ~ ~ ,~ ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ p O ~ ~ <D `O m ~ co ~. `C ~ ~ v' O r« ~' CL ¢' A' ~ `~ ~ ~ ~ O. C. p ~ O ~ N Cr1 A~ ~ O N ~ ~ ~ ¢' C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A C ~ ~ o' ~~ ~ co a ~ o ~ O c`'u ~ ~ ~ `C ~ v. n ~ ~. sv ~ a, co o ~ ~" ~ ~ O. A ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ P- ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O v' O. ~ ~C n „-• ~ r ~' p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ¢' n ~ G ~ ~ ~ '~ n ~ C Q" ~ O O ..-~ x S c~ 0 0 0 C b N w ~ ~ ~ a1 rn W ('~ n N N ,~ O N ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ CD rrJ ~ 'LY ~ C7 b `~~' ~ ~ ~ coo ° ~ ~ U' ~ ~ a: ~ ~ ~ ~ < o ~ a- ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ 'ZS pqa' ~ ~ ~d ~• ~ ~ ~ `Zs pq~' coo ~ ~co ~ ~ '~ 0'Q~. ~ ~ ~ r. '~ ~' ~ ~ P-: v, ~ o ~ ~ .... ~' ~ p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' O ~ ~ ~ fD ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n ~ O r-~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C7 ~ ~ n ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~. d O~~. 4 cn ~ p. ~ ti ~ ~ UG ~' ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ O C O ~ ~ ~ (~D O Q- ~ pi' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ¢: ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ O CD ~q. cn QQ ~ .+ ~ `~ '~ ~ ~ ~ C/~ n O O '"C~ O C c~u '"d w 0 o~ o, ~ o, ~ rn ~ ~ ~ ~ n O ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~. o . o o ~ ~ o ~ ~• ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ b Ry ~] ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~. :v ~'y ~' ~ ~ c~u 'rl ~b bJ'~3 ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~C Una m `' ~ a, ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ 'b ~ ~, ~ ~. ~ c ~ ~ co ~ co • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~ o' ~ '~ ~ a o' ~ ~ o o~ ~ .~ o ~ ~.~ ,~ o~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ • o o ~. ~ ~ ~. o .~ ~. a~ a, ,-* a ~ o~ ~ Q, ~ ~ b ~~ ~ a ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ N oq o b oo ~ g oo ~ o ~• ~ ~ ~ ~• o ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~• ~ ~ oq o ~• ° ~ °q ° ~~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ cu ~ ~ ~' ~ o ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ g f0 ~ ~ cu ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ o Q. ~ ~ ~ A, ~ o ~' ~w ~ ~ ~' o '~ ~ ~n o c~ ~ o o ~ CD c~ c~ ~ ~ ~' ~' ~ ~ ~ o coo ~ ry. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~• a ~ o r* ~ o~ ~,, o _' o ¢ ~ o ~ ~~ ~ ~ Q' ~ ~ Q. ' ~ ~: ¢' ~ a ~ ~.. ~ ~ ~ 'C O S ` 3 . ~' `7 ~' ~~'h ~ C C C c~ ~=- ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~~ ~~ 0 ~~ z ~• ~• ~ o a. 0 ~. ~~ rn w w b 0 ~• ~~ 0 0 a 0 ~. n' c~ b 0 uc •~ O h 'C~ C~D ~. ~~ ~, oV 0 y b ~. ~~ . ,~ ~, ~o ~ 0 •~ ~o~~ ~~~~ 0 o ~~~ b ti: ~.,. No ~~ ~~ A O p.. ~. .~ 0 cn 0 d c ~. ~° c~ O w cv rn w N 0 0 ~, ~• ~. ~~ o• 0 ~• c~ c~ ~; 0 0 •~ 0 C cv C~D b w ~-. o~ i~ ~' ~ n. ~ O. N ~ I (JQ ~ y ~ o pq~' ~ ~o ~ ~ c~ .~ `D• o ~ ~~ ~~ o CD ~~ ~. ~~ ~~ ~~ 0 6c ~ 0 0 o ~. ~. ~, c~ a. c~ O Q.. rn W to ~ C ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ 't7 Cn ~ ~ p ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ n ~ ~ ~ p. ~ cD a ~ a ~~ ~ ~ A~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C cn ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ cn ~ (D ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ N ~~y ~ ~ ~ ~y~ .-. ~ ~'~ :b tr~'y ~b7 ~i b~y v~ ~ ~b~ '~l ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ o ~ ^~ a. o °m ~ ~. o °~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ ~ o ~ CD ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~-+~ ~ o ~ c~ o~ ~ ~ o+ c ~ c o~ ~ ~ ~ o . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~' * o ~. ,... o ~ a. ~ ~ o ~ o o r o ~~~ ~ ~ ~. oti~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~.~ o ~ bo°p „ b . ooms ~ ~ ° ~ o~ o ~ . o ~ ~ ~ `0 °n ~ ~' `O '~ ~ ~ o o ~ ~ O ~ b ~ ~' O ~ ~ ~ o s ~~ ~ ~~ ~"' ~ b o CD ~ o o ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ 'b o ac , ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ cu ~ o ~ W ti ~ ~ ~ ~;' o ~ ~ ~ a, `° ~ o oq o ... 0 ~ 0 ~ , ~ ~. s ~ o~ ~. ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~, ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~; ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~*, ~ ~ C ~ ~ O ~' ~' `C ~ ~ ~-' ~ ~ ~7 ~. ~ co f~ ~ ~ h ' `' '~' ~ tS ~? ~j ~ 'd cn ~ n' . ~ ~ ~ _ n CD ~ O ~ G. ~ ,. . ~ ~ cu C ~ ~ ~ ~. O i ~ , ^~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i v ~ ~ (~ O ~ . ~ o ~ ~ ~ b ~ ~• b ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ a. . ~ ~ ~ ti >G ~C CD (~ O O 'C7 0 c c~ ro w N ~ ~ ~ ~~ N '"' .y O C b N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A.~~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ N can ~ ~. ~ ,~ o. ~ ~ ~ as cn ~ .~ ~? ~ C ~ p' C (D "+ C CD (7 ~ CD a, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (~D O ~ ~, o.. `J ~ '.~ b ~ 'y coo o ~ ~'~ dQ ' p ~ cD ~ ~ ~ r ^~ ~~ O ~' p r. 'L3 O ~ •- CD ~ ~ C' 0 ~ ~ '~ O ~ ~ D ( ~ C. ( b ~ ~ ~., ~ ~• ~ ,-~. cu ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' °, N '~ ~. ~ oo p ~ cu ~ ~ ¢. ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ s~. ~ ~ a ~ b ~ ao ~ o a o ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ , o ~ ~ ~ ~ °a ~ ~ ,~ ~' ¢ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~: o ~ o ~ . ~ ~ cra n coo ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~. ~ ~ p ~ ~ o. co ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v~~o ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ : ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~~ o ~ o. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ cn ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ . ~ n ~ ~ ~ ~ rn 'v, 'rJ rri N ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ a. . ~ ~, CAD C~D p ~ ~ '-~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . o ~ C~ y ~ ~ ~ ~ °4 o `~ ~. oV ~ ~ ~ c o ~ b0 dq ~ ' ti ~ Q.. ~ ~ (1Q b ' ~ ~ ~ , ~ ti ~ Vt n ti c o ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ UQ O ~ ~ ~ ~ b ~ CD ~ p ~' n ~ ... ~. o ~ ~ ,~, a~ . mo ~ ~ r* ~ ~. c1. ~ `~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o c~ ~ a ~ ~ o ~ '~ . ~' ~ o ~' Q.. ' ~ o ~ ~ ~ as ~ ~ ~, o ~ ~ o' ~ ~ ~ '* c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c~ . ~ ~ o a ~ ~ A N C D N ~ b ~ C~D ~ ~ Q.. n cn rn O ~ ~ ~ o c~u ~' a. CD ~'' c~ O G G1. CD 0 ~~ a. ~, m ~~ .~ 0 ~n C~7 vo 0 (0 'ZS O co O '~ ~• ~ b ~ co ~_ ~• ~ ~ ~ o ~ s~ `~ x c~ 0 0 0 C CD b `.-~ w w ~ o\ rn ~ ~ rn ~ ~ ~ c~ o ~ ~ ~ C• ., o ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ c ~c ~ ~ ~ c~ ~' ~, ~ o c~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N n ~ o ~ ~ ~: ~ m ~u cu ~' CrJ ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ Q;~ o a~.o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ,~ '~ ~-• ~ co ~ ~ ~ ~• ~ • co y ~ ~ ~cD co ~ O ~ O co ~. ~ o 0 ~'• cv ~ < ~ co ~ •~ ~. ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~.~ ... ~~ ~ o ~ a. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 .~~' ".~ O G CAD n ~. ~_ c~ 0 c~ 0 0 `~ 0 c c~ b w ~ ~ ~ n O b ~ N fD ".1 ~ ~ ~ J b ~ N O c~~n' W N "~ ~ ~ A ~y ~~yy v ~ CD ~ ~ ¢' 00 -~+' C D C ~ ~ CAD ~ C N ~, (p N ~ ~ O eC ~ ~ C) ~ C D ~ p ~? C ~. ~ ~ A 'a ~ ~ O ~ ` ~ CAD ~ `~ ~ 'C3 ~ ~ r~7 ~' ,~ ~ ' ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ a. ~; n O ~ ~ ~ '"' ~.. ~ C. O ~ y~ ,..r ... ~ (D .O o ° ~ ~yd O ~ ~ ~'y C~ ~ ~• A~ ~ ~ ~ ~3`~ ~ (~ O ~ fv ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ o ~ C ~ cu ~ ' ~ ~ C ~, ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `C ~S , ~ ~ ~ c v ~ ~ ~ , ~ Q. ~ N ~ ~ ~ O N b pq co ..i OQ ti ~. ~ cn ~ ° ' o ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ c o co ~ cD m ~ ~ ~ . c~ ~ ~ "~ ~ A~ ~'• ~ ~' coo ~ ~ coo O ~-+~ ~. m ~ ~ r+ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ° o ~'' ~ o o ~' ~' o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ ° ~ o~ ~ o ~~ ' o ~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o o ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ O ~ N p ~ ~ O ~ C ~ ~ ~ N O N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O • p O N ~ ~ ~ O N O ~ . ~ ~ ~ ti ~ O ~ ~ O O ~ (D O f?. ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ cn , .r ,_. ~' fD q W :~ CD ~' O ~ ~ ~' ~ ~C ~. ~. ~ ~ ~ O ~ C~~, C .,. co C ~ ~ `C "~ ~ n (D ~ A~ O n ~' ~' ~ ~ ~ v~ ~ UQ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ O ~ O ~ A~ O ~ ~ O ~ :n ~ ~-.. ~ ~ ~ ~ Q: can C A ~. ~ ~ ~. ~ gib ~ ~ A~ n CD ~ ~ O ~ ~n ~ ~ ~ ~ O C o. o A CD O ~c0 C `C ~ O C C co ~-* n n ~ '~ "~ '-' O O ~ O r.y ~ ~ ~ ~ ( D G ~ O ~ a o ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ o ua ~ ~ a ~ ~ a ~ ' ~ ~ o ~- ~• ~ ~' c~ oa ~ `~ '~ ~ ~ ~ n 0 3 C A~ O `a (D C/~ n O O 0 c co b w cn ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N '--~ ~ CD r-'+ r+ C o ~ 'L~ CAD O CD ~ ~ ~ ~ (1Q ~' 'TS O G CD ~ ~ o ~ 0 ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c `o of ~ ~ ° o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~. ~ ~ o ~ ~' ~ ~ o `~ O ~ p O O ~ ~ O r+ ~ ~ R ~ ~ O ~ O N ~ D ~ co ' a p Q ¢ ~ ., , . o ~ co O C - ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O C O ~ ~ ~ (~ ~ ~ ~ "n ~ n ~ O O ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~' ~ .-~ • ~ r+ ~ ~ ~ ~ O C (7 D ~ ~. n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~C n UQ Q O ~ '3 ~ ~ ~' (P n ~ ~. O ,.~ ~' N O ' w ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ A~ ~y yy a r~ '~'~. cu W `~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . `.n. ~ C ~ ~ ~ r~-y ~ y ~ .a ~ ~ ti ~•' ~ a ° ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~. ° o . ~ o ~ ~~~ ~ ~ coo p ~ ~ A~ ~ ~ ~ ¢, O ~ o~~ ~~ ~~ ~: ~ O ~ O~ ~ ~~ ~' N W O p~ O ~ ~s ~ ¢' ~ ~ cu n CD :v 0.y '~3 i0 ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~' ~S p~GA' c0 ~ N O co ti ~ cD ~ ~,. ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ¢- '~ o o O °o ~ ~ ~. • ~ ~ ~ N (D v' n O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ °o~ ~~~ o. ~. ..r ;:Y ~ ~ O~ O ~ ~ '~~ ~ n n O A „~ ~' ~. ~ ~, ~. A~ N cv N N CD C G O ~ 'C3 ~ ~ '~ O gib ~TJ y ~ b ~ ~ o ~,. (~ ~ ~ ti. ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~- ~., ~. ~.`~ ~ ~ a o 0 0 0' ~ ~ o ti ~ O ~ ti G ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ O '~ ~ n ~ ~~ O A~ n O ~' CD ~C m b O m '~ 0 O Q O~ '~~ A~ ti k CD C/ n O O_ r-i '~ O C cv b W 01 o~ C~ c~ ~, ~. 0 0 0 ~' 0 0 0 c~ n 0 ~c 0 O c~ c~ ~ ~ y d ~ ~ ~ ~ ooh ~c° ;,. ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~o ~ '~ ~ a ~ ~ o ~ o ~ ~ ~~~ tip. ~~~o~ ~~~~o ~ ~. ~.~ off. ,~ ~ o ~o ~ ~. ~_ ~ o' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~-. ~ ~ ~, a ~ Q- ti. ~ 0 0 ~ ~ o ~' ~ ~. ~ o ~_ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ A ~~ ~. O~ ~ ~ ' i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c c~ ~ ~° ~ o c ~ o' ~ ~ ~ o' w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o' ~ ~ a o ~~ ~, .... ~., o. ~~ a a. 0 cro ~~.' ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ s ~ •. a 0 s n~ o~ ~° ~° ~° ~° o' ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~. `~ ,~ ~ o' ~. Q- n o 0 ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ,~ ~ a. ~ o ~' o ~n ~?. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. o ~ a? ~~°~ ~~ ~ ~~~~ ~. O ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~, 0 0 ~ n O ~ ~' ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~c ~ ~ x ~ ~ ~; ~ ~n ~c ~' 0 n n CU y ~~ ~_ ti 0 0 ti 0 0 ti ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ •~ ~ r' ~ co ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~. ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ti ~ x ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ c~ ~ o ~' '~ ° a ~ o ~ c~ ~ ~~ ~ o ~ ~~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ o ~ o°~~~ ~~ ~ oti~~~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ o ° ~' ~ o a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ < . ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ o ~ ~ o ~ o ~ o ~ ~ ~ A ~ ~ o ~ ~ C D _ ~ ~ ~ N O ~ o . ~' pi ~ ~ . ~ O i ' o i `C v ~ c~ a ~ n ~ ~ o~ 0 o ~ v~ ~ ~ ~ ~.. r ~ ~ CD CD ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ tea. •. a 0 s o s~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ o' b~ ~o ~ ~ '~ c~ ~ cu ~ ~• ~ ~. cra ~~ ~ m a ~~ ~- `~ ~ o ~' ~ ~ ~~~ o~ ~ 0 a~~ ~~ ?' ~n ~ o° 0 0 CD a 0 ~. x c~ 0 0 0 C CD N b w v co ~ ~ 00 ~ x ~.. d ~ c ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~• ~ ~ ~. ~ ~. ~' ~ ~, o ~ ¢- ~ o '~ A~ O ~ ~ N O C ~ ~ O o ~ o o ~ (xD n ~ O O~~. ~ ~ ~ ~ V] ~. ~ O O O ~ ~ O m ~ b ~ o °q ~ ~' 0 n ~ O ~' O ~ O ~7 O~ b~ ~. W ~d ~ ~ 0 c~ ~ 'TJ C/] b ~ ~ o n ~ .... m ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ o ~• ~ 0 ~ ~' ~ ~ o' ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~, ~ . . 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ O :~ O vi ~ ~ `~ `C~ C7 ~ O ~ ~' CIQ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~'•~~~ o ~ ~. n ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~' 'C3 ^, ¢, (~ p~'* ~ O ~' n O ~' ci ~ ~ A~ U~Q UQ ~ O ~ ~' ryy ~ v~ ~ ¢' A~ n O ~' O ~ O ~ ~ .'~ r+ O ~ O '~ K ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ... C ~ ~ ~.. cro y ~_ N O O ti N O O ~ y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r S. ``" °o O ~ O [~,> O O ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~--' ~ a ~ ~ .~ ~, ~ o ~ ~'. o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o o b ~ o ~*, ~ ~ ~ o ~' ~ o `° ~~~~~ 0 o o ~. ~ o ~ ~ n ~ O (~D ~ Q- ~, C cow ti N a o. Q.. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ n (JQ ~ ~" i ~ n C CD ~n (~ ~' A~ N O ~7 A~ mss' oar" O O ~r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, a. ~ ~ ~' . ~ ~ `°. o n ~+, ~. o ~ ¢. ~ o ~~ O O ~ cn O ... ~' ~ ~' ~. O ~ n ~ O ~ `t3 ~ O ~. ~ ~ n ~ `3" CD O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CAD ~ ~, c~ x' `C3 0 a c ~, u~a 0 0 ~, ~. c~ 0 CD O O CAD CD 0 0 CD n CD ~' o, ~ ~ ~. o ~ n ~ .~ a. c~ ~ ~• o ~ ~ y ~ o ~ ~ ~ `zs A. ~ m ~ ~ ~- f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o~ ~ ~ ~' ~ u. ~ `° ~ d ~ ~ ~ a: o C7 ~ 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ti o ~ ~ ~ ~ ° O ¢'~ o ~ ~ ~ p O ~ ~ ~ cn ~ ~ `~ '~ ~ r ~' N O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n ~ d O O ~ ~ C 't3 ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ p~ "'' ~ ~ O ~' N ~ G- ~. O ~ ar ~ ~; N ~ ~ ~ C Q' ~ ~ ~ O n ~ O ~ O ~ `~ O C X CD n C/~ ~' O O O C O b w 00 00 ~ ~ ~. ~ ~o .r ~i' pp ~ ~ ~ J J ~. ~ • ~ ~. o0 00 ~. ~ ~ ... "~ ~- • N W N ~r ~ ~. ~~! z n ~ O ~ ~ 0 ~ ,~ A~ `~ ~ CD i ~ CD A~ ,... ~ A~ N .. (D v' ~ ~ • ~ * i v ~ ~ i v ~ ~ n ~1, i v ~ ',~ `C ~ ~ ~ ~ C .~ ~ ~-h ~ n `C ~ O :~ O ¢. Sv ~ O v~-ti U~Q O ~' ~ c ~ ~ ~ ti3 ~ ~~,~ ~ ~ y C ~ o ~ ~y d ,~ ~ ~ ~y d c u ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ ~, ~~ cv c ~ ~ ~, ~ c ~ cu ~ ~, ~ C ~ ~ v, ~ ~ ~' cu ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ co ~ ~ ~° ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c c~ ~• ss. o ~ w _ o c '~ ~ ~ Q ~ n o N CD n tio ~D ~ n eO o .. o o o ~' ~ '~~" ~ ~ ~ • ~' ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ti ti ~ O N UQ O o ~ ~ ~ ~ `~ ~ .7" ~ ~ O i N p~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (i ~ ~ ~ S ~ ~ O O .... .-• n n ~ ~ ~ ~ ( D ~ . o ua ~, .~. ~ ~ • o ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ is ~' o ~ ~' " ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ va' ~ ~ o `c ''~' ~ o ~ ~ a. ~ p ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~• o ~" ~ ~• ~ o ~ ~ ~ 0 0 ~,~ ~, o o ~ ~ ~ "' ~ ~ ° •~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ `c ~ ° S ° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a' ~ _ 7~ `° ~ ° `~ , ~ Q- ce ~, ~ o ~ 0 ~ 0 as ~ ~ c~ ~c 0 0 •~ 0 c b w 00 tJ N ~ •--• ~ A~ ''~ ~ ~ ' 3 v~ ~ p., CD ~ ~ ~ya~ ~ a, ~ ~ "' acs ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ a, ~*' ~ ~'- ~ ~ o ~ a. ~; ,~ •-. ''~ .- o ~`~°,~ o o ~ ~. ~ ~°~`~~~ O ~p ~ ~ ~ ~~-+- n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~o ~ ~ ~ ; , ~ ~ , ~ __ w N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A~ ~ ~ ~ (D ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p. ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'y ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ y~ ac`QO ~ ~ y ~ ~ ~ ~ y~ ~ Q' ~ ~ ~ ~ vo ~ `' co o ~ ti ~ C ar ~ `~ ~ ar ~ o a+ ~ ~ o ~, ~ '~ i '~ ~ w 'ZS ~' ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ o ~ ~ c~ s ~ ~ ~ o ~.,. ~ ° o ,-ti a. o ~ ~ o ~ c c ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~• ~ ~ ~ n Q c ~ o o N O 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ n O ~ - O ~ n O ~ O ~ ~ ~ O , ~ ~ O ~ O ~ O ~ 0 O ~ ~ , ~ ~ , ~ O ~ ~ ~ ., ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ cO N ~ ~ %~ co n ~C ~ ~ n ~ ~ co n ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ O ~ O ¢, m c D ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ n p ~ O~ ~ ~ ti O O ~ ~ ~ ~ O b ~, ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~" o ~ ~' r ~' `r ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ o .~ ~• ~ o ~ ~, ~ ~ , "' ~ `' ~ ~ • `' b `° ~ as b ~ b ~, p o ~ m ~ ~ o 0 0 0 ry ~ b ~ 'b A b ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~o ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~~ ?~ 0 0 0 c c~ b .p 0 N ~p ('~ N ~ ~~ ~ N C7 r~ f~D A~ O N b c`~~' ~ ~... vi ~ ~. ~° ~ ~. ~ ~ o ~' ~' ~~oo o ~ ~ ~ ~ o o, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ..-~ ~ CAD ~ O ~ U~Q ~ CAD o ~• .~ o ~ ~ o c~ ~ ~ o `~ ~ . ~ ~• ~ ~. ~ ~ °• o ~ c~ ~' ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ .... ~ ~ CIQ ,~ ~. ~ ~. c~ ~' 0 ~ o c~ ~ ~ ~ b 0 ar '~ m 0 ~ y o ~~ ~ ~- ~. ~ `°• o. 0 -~, a. co cic • ti~ 00 o~ O ~ o~ ~ ~-. k n ~~ m ,~O ~_ O ~G ~ C ~' rr ~ C ora ~ ~ Q ' O„ U `p `p ~O ('~ ~h <D ~ ~ ~ ~~a ~+ ~ a ~, d ~ d ~ ~ d ~ ~ c ~'' CD ~ ~ .~c~ ~~. o ~ o J o a o °c ~• 'C3 c~ 'C~ v'~ cv ~ C ''~ O ~ A' "' • ~ ~ ~ ~' -r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r' ~ ~ ~ '~ a. ~ ~ ~ ~ a' ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ te o-a . ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ `0 ~ ~ `0 w ~ ~ ~' • o '~ ~ o ~ o ~ m ~ ~ ~ °p c ~ o o ~ ~ ~ ~ u c '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~ o ~ ~ ~ '~ ~, ' '~' ~r~ ~ cv~..~ lT1 yNO ~ ~ ~ ~~-h N N C B ~ ~ N CD ~ '~ p y O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n ~ C ~ ~¢'~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ ~ rp ~ O ~'C ~ ~ ~ ~' p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~- ~ <D ~ ~,, CD U~ ~ ~ °' (TQ ~ ~ c O ~' ' ?~ ~. o ~ cu ~ i ~. Y ° ¢- ~ ~. i A v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~! O ~ O ~ CD "'i~ ."'.. n ~ . q ar • ~• ~' ¢; ~ ~ c ~ CD ~ ~ ~ '"' A' ~ C u ~*, CD ~ C ~ ~ ~ O ' ~; n ~ ~ O C • N •~ ~ ~ ~ ~ D ~ ~ ~ - 7 C D try . /~+ a o • ~ ~c ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ n ~ ~ ~c o ~ ..~. b fD ^! A~ R 'b 0 b 0 ar nb ~ ~. n S ~ `~ ~~ ~ x O ~ ~ O ,~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~• ~ ~, o ~• c~ ~ ~. b 0 co O ti c~ O O 'd O c c~ ~. b .p 0 o ~ b w ;~ o O ~ e~ v, `o ~ ~ n w O ... ,,i r° ~'~ ~o ~~ m~ c~ p A~ A~ CI ~ "'t ~ ~ (~D O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ fD ~ o ~ ,~ G ~ ~ s ~ ~ y C ' v' ~ ~ ~ y ~ ~ ~ Q ~s , ~ ~ ~ „ ~ ~ C~ °e ~ ~ , '~ A, ~ ~ ° ~ - ~ c~ o ~ ~ o ~ o °~o ~ ~; ~ ~ ", • ~ cu o ~ co ~ ~. ' ~ "' ~' ~ ~ ~ cn .~ ~ c ~ ~ `° ~ ~ `~ ~' ~ o• ~C o `° ~ ~ ~ o ~ `° ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ¢, ~ O .o c ~, a, cu ~ ~„ ~ co ~ `c ~ C o ,..,, ~ ,~, o ~ ~. ~ ~ ~-, n ~ " k 0 0<~ < k ~ ~ ~ ~ O .r n..1 c0 O (D O ~ ~ O ~ cn ° ~ ~ $' e--r ti ~ ~ Vl ~ ~ ~. ~. ~' ~ ~ ' A ~ o s ~ ~ ~ a, o ~ . o ~ °' C~~ v~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~~~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ Q- c o O '~ CD co b ° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ o ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y ~ a. ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ c ~ ~' ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ CD ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q.. ~ ~. o a o ~ a ~ , d . 0 ~ o ~ ~' ~ .., ^~ ~ ~ ~. o ~ ~ r° ~• ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ . ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a, ~ ~' 0 k n 0 ~O 0 N N ~ ~ 0 o ~• ~ ~ N ~ ~ O y n ~ ~ ° ~' ~ ~ ~~ ~' ° ~ y C ~ cu a ~. ~ o . °q _ _ o a? ~ ~ ~ ~-, ~. v' ~ o cu ~ • Q, ~o ~ .- • ~ ~ ors o• ~ °, ~ ~ o c~ ~ 0 o, ~ p ~ ~ ~ k ~ O ~ O ~' co \ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ O t~ O v ''' o ~ p- c~ ~ ~ ~ uo ~' y ~ ¢ ~~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~,~ Q.. ~ ~ o ~' ~ o '{' co. o' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ e ~. ~ ~ o, ~ cu ~ ~ cu ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ua• a, ~ o ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ o o o o ~ o ~ c~ , ' ~ °° ( ~ ~ . o ~ ~ ~ ~ N O i 0 W O ~ W ~. ~--• ~ (~'' 7 ~. „~' ~-' ~n "~"~ O O y' N ~ ~. ~ ~. ~n a. ~ ~, ~. ~~ ~ c ~ ~ c~ .~ a. ,~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~c •~ cu c~ c~ 0 c~ a 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 00 '~ 0 h7 ~ o °o ~ o ~' p, ~~ ,~O 0 0 tJ O N ~• ~ ~ A~ ~`~~ ~ O n ~ O N ,.~ O .. A~ n ~. ~--. ~.. y `~ ~ co ~' ~• ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~' a' ~. ~ o ~ ~ ~ `s° ~ ~ ~ o s o ~. •~ ~o ~ ~ ~n n ~. ~ o c~ '~ a. ~. ti ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ o ~ ~ 'r ~ ~ • ~, N ~, ~' ~ °o ~.. ~ ~ a ~ ~ c~ a. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'. ~ ~ o ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~+ ¢, •~ c~ 0 0 0 c~ O N b (gyp N N ~ ~ ~ :r :roR7 'yCrJbtr~ ~3C~7:v~ 'yS~ w ' ° o co o o~ ~.~ o ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ x ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~ o o °~ ~ ~ .. ~s .. ~ ~, o ~ . ~ ~ ° ~ ° °o °o ~ ° °o~ ~ °o ~ m , ~ o ~ , ~ o ~ ~. ~ o ~ ~. ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ wo ~ o °o ~ o ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ,~O ~ ,~O ,~O ~ ~' ,~C ~ ~ ~ ~ y ~ ~ ~ c~ , ~ ~ ~ y ~ ~. ~~ f. ~. ti 0 00 a ~. ~" °o ~ ~ O r~ ~ ~ ~_ N v' ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ o CD o ~ ~. ~ ~• ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a: ~ ~ ~, c o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. Q.. ~• o ~ •-. ~, ~, c~ ~~~.~_ ~ ~ o a' ~ ~' ~ ~ Q-. ,... o ~• ~. ~ Q.. ~.c~ o . ,~ 0 ~. C/~ n ~' O O O b O 0 0 0 c b w 0 in o ~ ~ `~ ~ ~ c~ ~ w ~ , ~ ~ ~ ua ~ •~ ~ ~ ~ ~' c~~y~ x a~ c~~ y~-~ c~~ _ 6 ~" ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~~ ~q ~ , • ti ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c o ~' (D ~ ~ m • '. ~. m c 'b ~ 't3 • ~ ~' ~ ~ n . ~ <° ~ ~ ~ vim, co ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ r., ~ '1 ~ O •. O ~. •. ` O N ~. ~ ` ' o b k ~ d ~ U4 ~ `° ti ~ • ~ co ~ ~, . O o n ~-s ~ o ~ c ~ o o ~ ° ti ¢. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ . o o ~-. ~ o~ a o ~ ° ~ o ~`~' ~~ o ~ ~ a. ao~' ~ ~~' ~ ~ O ~ ~ O ~ ~ Rom ~ ~ ~ ~.~ • `c ~ p CD o co o ~ ~ ~ O o ~ ~ ¢' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O C O o b ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~ O A. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ o. O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~' x , ~ ~ c o ~ c u p ~ ~• o ~ ~ o K 0 o ~ ~~ C~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .-, ~ ~ ~ ~ a y ~ ~ o n O ~ ~ ~• ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r+ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p ~. ~ O p n O ~ ~ O ~ ti ~ ~ r+ ~ ~ FO-h ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ .-. ~..-. ~~ ~ ~ Q- C p Q-: N O ~ ~ ri O ~ ~ a. ~ ~ ~ ~, ~. ~ ~ a c~ w ~ y ~ ~ d4s1' co ~ a, ~ ti c~ ~' ~ •~ cn co O ~ '~ 0 cp O k O m ~• ~o ,~O 0 o' ~' (0 m s• ~ ~ ~. ~c~n ~ `~ ~ N ~ ~ o O O tv ~ Q.. O n ~ o ~~ a~ ~c o r-. c~ ~ ~ ~. as o ~ c~ ~ o o 0 ~. `~ U~4 ~. ~ p ~ ~. .-• • ~". ~ o F-n ~ ~ ~ ~. a. p 0 0 0 b ~, ~, ~, ~, ~-. ,..r ~, ~ ;~ w "-• N b ~- ~„ ~~//-- a r-' a "~' r ry ~ O ~ ~ ~ p~ te (D phi O ~ C. v~ v~ CAD ~ ,~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ O ~ A O (p D C O '~ n~ ~ y a ~~ ~ y~ ~ ~yY ~ m ~ , a ~ '~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ A, ~ ~ o ~ ~ a. ~ te , ~ o ~ ~ ~ o as ~ o 0 r~ ~, • a+ ~ ~'+ co ~ o ..~ ~ ~ ~ i ~' ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ~o o o . o ~ ~ ~ c~u ~ ~ ~ ~ o r ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ r ~' " • ~ ,~ '~ '~ ~ o o ~ o a, ~ • ~ ~ ~ 'zs ~_CD ~' ~ o ~ ticu o ' ' ~ ~ cn ~' ~ `~, O ~ '~ n QQ ~ ~ ° ° ~ o ~-,, ~ ~ o o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~: ti ~' ~ ~ ° o 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o o ~ ~ o ~ CD o ~ ~ ~ 7~ ~ ~ ~. ~ o `~ °oo, ~ ~ ~ r° ~ ~ o ~ a ~ o ~ o b ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~_ ~ ~ ~ '~ ° o ~ ~ ~ o --•~'o ~ a ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n ~ ~-s ¢, ~ ~. o ~- • co ~ ~ ~, ~ o • ~ ~ o ~ ~' ~ ~ o n ~ ~ 'b ~ A, Ch c`~n n ~ O ... ~,' co O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m o o ~ ~• ry. co ~ cu U~Q ~ ~ ~ a, 0 (0 ~-. ~-.+ ~ ~.. ~ ~ CD ~ ~ nom' O y~~ ~~ ~. ~ ~ ~' o ~' o `< o ~ '~ ~• ~ ~ ~ ti ~~ o ~ ~ O W ~ tzi ~. v~'a c~ ~- A O C b n~ O ~~ n ~" O ... ~~Oqq `C O "~. 'S d ~~ A~ QQ 0 ~s ~~ ua e 0 a m C. fD n C A S "~ 0 0 c~ 0 0 0 C b 'v, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w a ~c •~ o ~ ~ ~' ~ o ~ ¢. ~' ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ o ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ A, ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ acv ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ c CD o °q~ ~. s o °~ ~. ~ f0 ~ • ~ ~. ~ ,~ ~ o ~ ~ a ~ o' ~ ~ ry ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . c~ ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ cu a, ~ o co b b n ~~ °~,' ~ • o 0 ~ b NO cu ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ... ~ ~ ~. o ~ ~ s ~ ~ 0 ~ ~--• ~. ~ ~ ~ b o~ ~ ~ a 'Zs ~ o ~ v ~ c u ~ ... ~ o ~,, ~ ~, ~ o ~ . ~ s 'ZS ~ ~ C • ~ U Q 0 cD ~C ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ b co O UQ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ n' ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ N "~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U Q s• ~ ~ ~ o cu ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ ~, `, n. ~ o ~. co ~-n ~' o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c o c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • b ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ b o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • o ~ ~. ~' o c~ co c~ ~C 0 0 •~ 0 C c~ b .~ rn N N N .•-~ ~ c.h ~ W ~ ~ ~ n ~ n ~ ~ ~ o ~ °o ~ a ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ o N ~ ~ ~' ~ c~ ~^ ~ ~ l l yv~~ ~,R+'~30~ ~tr~yy~-1~Q~ `~,~ C~o~ ~~~•o°c4o ti ~~ o°~ coo ~• ''rl ti c0 ~ ~ ti co "• '~3' N ~ ~ ~ '~ (~ ~ O nQ ~ r'ri ~f ~ ~ ~ (~0 O~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~• ~ ~`~° ~ b~~~~ b~ ~~~ b~ 0 o ~ ~ o 0 0 ~ ~ o ~, °o ~ ~ o R. ~ a o,o~~.o ~ o.-o o ~ O ~ ~ ~. CZ. .O ~•~~ A O ~ ~ ti O ~ ~ ~'- r '~ ~- ~ o-0 oq ~ ~ ~A ~ o•~~ ~~ ~_ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ `~~ '~ 0 CD (~ ;-r N N "~ ~ O ~ ~' ~ C ~• ~ ~ ... ~ ~ N ~ ~ b N,~ ~ ~ O A'+ ~, N ~, O .~ ~ ~ k3' ~ A~ n n ~ ~ ~ . . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , r ~ a ~ ~s ~ + ~ ~ '* ~ C~ ~. c ~ ~ ~' ~ n ~ ~ °~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ya `°~ ~ A~ ~ ' * ~ y~~~~• O ~ ~ y ~. ~~ ~~ ~. ~~o~~ a ~ ~. ~ ~,~ ~•~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ^~ ~,~~ ~. ~ ~ O ~ ~ a ~ o• ~ ~ ~ '~' ~• O~ ~ p ~ ~ ~ D A~ . ' ' " . -r ~ ~ ~ "~ ~ A gy ~ .3 ~ . C A ~ ( p ~ po ~'~ r'-S- A~ ~~'p' ~ ° ~ • - s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ b '~ _ '~ o ~- c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~~ a~• ~ ~ NHS o y do ~ ~ n. ~ ono ~-. ~ ~ ~ o ooo~ o o ~. °o~• co°q n • c o ow ~ ~• ~•~ o ' ~ ~, o~ ~ ~•~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ° -s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ is ~ ~ ~ ~ k o ~ ~: p ~, O~ ~',,,, C a~ ~ ° n O ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~° ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O `C "~ Sy ~ ~ " ~ n .`°.,. ~ ~ ~ c~ O ~-. A~ " * ~ ~ b ~ ~ ~' A~ n .r ~ O ~ ~ C :~ O ~ O n ~ ~ `'• A~ ~ ~ ~ p ... A~ P- ¢ O a ara c~ rr ~. rte. n ~D `C (D C/~ ~" O O 'i~ ~t O C c~v `b J rr N fN ~ .-. N N N ~ ~ W w ~ ~ ~ W N ~• ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o o ~ b o • ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y~• cro ~ ~y d ~ ~ ~y ~ ¢ ~ ~ a, o• , o a A' ~ n o aoa'~ ~ . ~' ' ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ti . ~ r N ~ ~ ~~" •~. ~ O • O ~.." ti ~ O • ~'t ~ A~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ vi ¢, V] "~' O ~ '* ~' O ~' Q. O ~' ~n ~ ~ `~ dg a d. ~c~ (D y G ~ ~~y ~ C ~_ ~ ~ ¢ N ~ n ~. ° ti'~ o ~ ~' ~ ' ~ ' cCe °o o ~ ~, ~ oa cu ~ • ~ ti, °~' aa ~? ~ a~ i ° b a'~7 ~ ~ °" O O ~ lD ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N o ~ h (~D ~ ~, ~ . o ~ .-. o a~ ~ ~ S ~ ~ ° `C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ^~ o ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~~ ~ ~~ O co }{ co ~ ~ ~ n ~ A~ (D b ~ o~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~~ CD ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a" ~~ ~ o ~ b ~ tr ~ ~ ~ , ~ Q S - N N ~, ~• ~-•~ N N ~ N N ~ N ~-' A~ ~o ~'~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ a. ~b~yy~ ~b~'y~C ~. O co N ~' O ~ ~: ~ ~ ~ ~ p. ~ ~ ~ O ~~ O ~'~t ~ cn ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ., ~. ~ ~ ~ O F• ~ • 69 ~ ~• 6g ~ CD ~ O p=~ ~ p ~~~ co °~o~~° ooo'~ o ~ c ~ ti ~ ~ ~ ~ sy ~, '~ ~ ~. ~ cu ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~• ~ o' ~ R~ ~ ~ ?~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~. ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~. ~~ ~~ `~\ ~ O P~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ a, O b ~ .ti `~' o o ,~ ~ ~. ~~ ~ ~ A, '?,~ ~' O ~ ~ s• ,'3'' 0 0 '~ 0 C c~ b N A N N N n O .A ~ ? O C ~o ~~ ~o~ .... ~' ,~.~ ~ ~ coo ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o a, ~ ~ m o rv~yb~~~y~p :~~y~ ~ ~~ co m ~ o ~ A, ~ ~ cu `' ~, ~ o r* ~ gip., ~ cCo ~ ~ ~ p ~ ~ ~' `C O ~ r ~ ~ o co ti ~ ~. can! ~ '~ (gyp ~ ~ ~ ti N CAD '~~' ~ ~r N ~ .`S O ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~, ~ ~ ~! co ~ ~ ~ ~, '~ .~ ~' `fit ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~, co ~h o ~ ~, o ~ o~ o ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ .. ~ n~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ .o b~ ~~ ~ b~ ~~ ~b~ ,~~~ ° O ~, O C A~ O ~, O~~ O A, O ~ ~ .~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ 0 0 ~' co n cv ~ co n ~ co m ~ ~ S ~ cu ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~. ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ UQ ~ ° CD r° ~ ~' ¢, b~' ~~b.s~ b~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~; ~ ti ~ o ~. o °q ~ ~ ~', ~ ~ '~. o ~ ~ ~, a, ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ °o 0 ~ o ~ R~ ~ ~ ?7 ~ ?~ ?7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 ~ ~ N N W W ~ ~ b o a. ~ Q. ~ ~ •~ c~ •~ ~ ~ ~ C `~ • ~ ~ ~ y b ~ ~ ~ y b ~ ~ 0 0 .~ ~ ~t pq ~ N ~ ~ dQ ~, N ~ , 0 O ~p ~ ter. ~ O • G1. ~ ~. ~ ~' (JQ Q„ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~! O ~ ~S ~ ~ coo ~... .• ~ ~ ., ~ ~ ti ~ 0 0~ ''.~ p p O O ".~ 0 ~. ~ '" ~ o ~ ~" u ° `" ~ ~ ¢' ~ A, ~ ¢' n ry. tea. ~ ¢, o-q ~ ~ o ~ ~• ~ ~ 0 0 ~ ~' o ~' ~ ti ti ~ .o ~ ° ~ ~ ~'~O ~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ cra ~ ~ •~ c~ a cv 0 0 •~ 0 b N V1 ` ~-' '_' '~ d ~- N N N N ~p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .p v~ N ~ O ~ ~ ~ a ~~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~~ ~• o ~, b~ 'yC7 ~ ~ tby n ~ ~ ~ y 7~ o ~ ~b ytz7 v~o ~ ~ ~y ~ `.. _ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ o as ~ o ~o ~ o c ~ ,~ ~ ~ o ,~ ,~ ~ o o " ~ vo ~ ~ ~ o ~' as ~ ~ ~ S c~ n ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . b ~ '~ ~ ~,'' b ~ ~ o b ~ ~ ~ o O ~ ~' n N ~ O ~' ~ `CS Cd coo ~ t~ O ~ 00 .+ ' ~' ~ O 6' O O O N A~ ° ~ O ;-r ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O O ~ ~ ' '-. ~ ~~ ~ p `„ ~' O 00 ~ ~ ~ ~Q ~ A~ '-~ . ~ O ~ o ~ ~ ~ pi ~ ~ ~ : .r . ~ ~ ~ O (OD " ~ ~- ~- ` ¢• ~ ~ O O ~ ~. c o ~ ~ ~ O- ~ ~ c~ ~ ti (TQ ~ ~ p ° ~ ° ~ ~ O ~ ,O • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -A '" ~ ~-- ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ ~, c~ ~ O n C 'b co y co n ~ Oq O y ~ ''2~ ~. r ~ ~ ~7 p ~ O ~ S~ CAD ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p ''~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~ a, ~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c °o b ~. ~ ~ ~ o • a ~ ~ o ~ o o ~ Q.. ~, te , ~o ~ o ~ ~ ~ o• ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~' ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ o, ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ' ~ ~ °, o s ~ ~ ~ c~ N x 0 0 '~ 0 c b 0 N cow ~ ~~ s ~ •. b 0 b~ ~' ti ~ ~ o ~ a. o ~• ~ ~ 0 ~~ ~. ~ ~ 0 ~~7 `~ 7 to a ~ CD ~ P~ n ~ ~ ~ ~ O CD O ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. as y co co ~-. ~ ~' •~ ~ c ... o w ti 0 0 0 0 a ~. o ~ ~ a; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. o. co ~C ., 0 0 •~ 0 c~ b v, 0 A O -~h D O .~ CD D n A~ ~Q c/~ ..,. k 0 0 0 c c~ b v, N H 0 L7 O A A IS b A b 0 0 ~' a cu a 0 a C~ 0 `~ C/1 n 0 O Cd O O C~ 0 O O ~--• n (JQ 0 CrJ C7 C~ ~ o ~' H no ~ ~ C~ H C ~ ~ trJ 7d ~. ~ C~i ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, Z ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o o ~ fDs `c ~ ~' ~ u e~ ~ ~ ~ n o o' ~ c u ~C ~' o ~ ~ V~ `'h O ~s fD n O ~ A~ L7 CI rn'S ~ 0 O n ~ '~ CD ~ (p O V~i O r+ ... A~ ~ "'t' ~ ° ~ fD y ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V ~ c. r ~ o n ~ ~n ~ ~ ~ s ~-- ~ ~ o ~ `n. ~ ~ `~ `~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ff o ~. ~' o ~ ~ ° D C ~• ~ ~ ~ ~ ~" '~ n ~ c. p O ~ o . C ~ ~-s ..+ ~ v~ n ~ Uq t9 `~ i1. A~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ R ~ C O• ~' ~ A ~ A7 " b A:. ~ ~ (D ~ ~ . O trJ p ~ O C~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~• :r -`' ~• ~ ~ (gyp ~ gy ] ri ~ ~S' v~. ~~ ~ ~ o~o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ < ~ ~ ~.~ ~° ~ ... ~ ~y ~ ~~~ o ~ ~ ~~ a ~ ~~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ n~ ~ ~ ~ o ... ~ n o~o ~ ~ ~ o• ~ .~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ x va '~ ~- ~ ~' a ~ `~° x1 ~ ~ °-' ° o a CD ~ ~ c ~ o ~ ~ o ~, ~• o ~ n `~ ~ ~ ~-' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f9 cv O `L3 ~ A~ ~ ~ O ~ 0 "~ 0 ~ _~ ray ~ ~ cAn ~ ^'~ cu ¢` p A r rp ~ b ~ O Q- ~O ~ C' ~ ~ Q; fD r A~ ¢: A~ ~ ~ A~ R. "" ~ ~ ~' ~ C (~ ~ ~ ~ is A `i' ' 3 ~ <. n ~ ' G r ~ O ~ r .. N A~ ~ ~ . ~ L3 ' O A p ~ cu ~ n cD p ~, ~' ~ .r O o v ~ ~ O "~ ~ ~ o. `~ Q ~ . ~ . . - - !~ ~. GL in~ J. ,~~. ~ O O T n ~ ~ N ~ ~ O ~. ~ ... n '~ ~ a- ~• ~ ¢ fD co . ~ o ~ ( D ... .r ~• ~ ~ ° fD o v4 ~. x ~ CD ~• ~ ° ~ ara y ~ cr o c c ~, ~ ~ ~ cn C C ,,.,, a ao ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~, o ... O "~ ' ° " °~ a' O ~ n ~ ~ C1 ~' cn n ~~ ~ O ~ ~ "` ' fD O. O ~ ' ~ CD ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~~. ~ .. n c o ~ O ~ er ~' n , ~ `.~ C1 ~ . ~ ,.+~ S r' ~ O ~ C /l n O n ' A~ ~ n A ~ . N ~ ~s' ~ ~s • c~' ~ O ~ ~ O. ~. CD fD C '~' ~ ~. N ~- ~ G O iv o J * ~ ~ O ~ C ' n ~~ o ~~ `~° ~ ~ n ~' ~ ~ O ~ o ~ o ~ o 0 0 ~~ ~ ~ o ~° ~~ ~ c x c ~ ~ o ra 7~ 0 ° 0 0 0 0 O 0 CD ~. 0 U~Q 0 0 O '~ O CD ~, CD 0 0 ~. cn fD o' ~_ ~• t9 ~c O O ''C~ O b v, w ~~.C ~ n ~ n ~ i w o o ~ ~~ '"'ado .~O ~_ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u4 ~ ; ~ ~ ~ °4 ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~: ~ ~ CD o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o C~J `~ o o a. ° ~ o OQ ~ ~ ,O.t ~ ~. ~ ~ n p ~ ctq ~' ~ ~ C O r. ~ ~ ~ O CD ~ ~ ~ A ~ ¢. ~• A7 ~ ~ ~ O CAD N ~-+~ ~• CAD ~. ~ ~ ~ O ;r n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O a' ~ iv C CAD ~ O O ~ O tO ~ p ~ `C ~ n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ R. ~ ~ ~ O ¢.• (~ ~ Q `~ O .°~ ''L3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ vii n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~+ c~ C ~ cu ~ O ~ n O ~ "~~' ~ ~ O cn ~ O ~ ~ ~ C/~ ~ ¢, .r G1. ~ N (~ n O ''h CD .'~'j n a, ,~.r (~ ,rt ~ p O ~ R ~ p ~ N ~ C ~ r~D `C O ~ !y (TQ C`FD (~ ~ cn ~ ~ ~~.. A~ `~ .-•. (D /~ ~ ~ ". O O A~ `C ¢. N chi ~ O ~ C ~ ~ O T' ~ ~ O p ~' ~ O ~ ~ C c~u p' ~ N ~ ~ ih `C C7~ ~ Q. co ~ n ~ or o ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ `~ o ~' `C CD (~ ~.' O O 'C3 O C O b 0 .A ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER ~ ~ ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 14, 2000 AGENDA ITEM: Work Session for the County of Roanoke Six-Year Secondary System Construction Plan for Fiscal Year 2001 through 2007 and review of the Revenue Sharing Priority List for FY 2001-02. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: In accordance with Section 33.1-70.01 of the Code of Virginia and the policy of the Virginia Department of Transportation, the Board of Supervisors is requested to revise and update the Six-Year Secondary Road Construction Plan every year. This plan, developed jointly by Virginia Department of Transportation and County staff, was developed by reviewing the current construction plan and requests received by both County citizens and the Board of Supervisors during the past year. The County staff and representatives of the Virginia Department of Transportation have requested this work session to review and finalize the proposed plan. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The following summarizes the changes made to this year's Six-Year Secondary Construction Plan, Revenue Sharing Priority List and Rural Addition Priority List. Roanoke County received approximately $3.6 million last year. Roanoke County's budget for FY 2001-2002 is estimated to be approximately $3.56 million. In Countywide Items, this category includes traffic signs, entrance culverts and rural addition roads. Because Roanoke County's rural addition list is very long, $180,000 was allocated, which is the maximum allowed by state law. 1 ~` Two projects from last year's list, Autumn Drive and Bluebird Lane, have been submitted to VDOT for construction and therefore removed from the list. Staff is recommending that the following projects be added to this year `s priority list; Leffler Lane, Dow Hollow Road, Uphill Drive and Grey Fox Lane. Incidental Construction are items that include minor construction that can be completed normally within one year, such as pavement overlays, drainage improvements and minor curve improvements. There is no funding in this category since all incidental construction items are addressed under the Revenue Sharing Program for FY 2001-2002. Staff will again be requesting the maximum allocation of $500,000 for the Revenue Sharing Program from the Commonwealth of Virginia. The majority of this year's priority list, FY 2001-2001, are projects that were not funded last year. The bulk of Roanoke County's allocation of funds approximately $3.1 million are for numbered projects. The following roads have been completed or have received sufficient funds to be completed and no longer appear on the six-year plan. They are Patterson Drive (Route 669) and the railroad crossing, flashing lights and gates on Layman Road (Route 606). Priority projects numbered 0 through 12,18 and 19 are scheduled to receive funding this year. They are Hardy Road, Hollins Road, McVitty Road, Old Cave Spring Road, Colonial Avenue, Buck Mountain Road, Cotton Hill Road, Mountain View Road, Boones Chapel Road, Catawba Creek Road, Florist Road, Dry Hollow Road, Merriman Road, King Brothers Road and Rocky Road. Projects added to the plan are: • Buck Mountain Road -this project involves reconstruction of 0.14 miles of road and the intersection with Route 220. Staff is requesting that this project be added to the six-year plan because of the increased commercial activity in the area and the safety concerns. • John Richardson Road -replace bridge and approaches on John Richards Road. Staff is requesting that this project be added because of increased traffic due to commercial development in the Hollins area and deteriorating condition of the bridge. • Starkey Road -reconstruct 1.05 miles of road. With the continued commercial and high density residential development along this corridor and the proposed opening of the South County Park Complex this spring, staff is recommending adding this project to the six-year plan. 2 ~,' ~. °'; ..~:„~, Projects considered but not added because of insufficient funds: • Hardy Road, Carvins Cove Dam Road, Bohon Hollow Road, Honeysuckle Road, Two Ford Road, Hershberger Road, Manassas Drive and Franklin Street. These roads will be monitored each year for consideration to be added to the six-year plan. The complete Six-Year Construction Plan for FY 2001 through 2007 and Revenue Sharing Priority List for FY 2001 through 2002 are part of this report, for your review. ALTERNATIVES AND IMP No fiscal impact to County funds are involved. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Request that the Board of Supervisors authorize staff to schedule a Public Hearing on the Six-Year Secondary Road Construction Plan for FY 2001-2007 and Revenue Sharing Priority List for FY 2001-2002 on December 19, 2000. SUBMITTED BY: ,~, 1' ~~ `~ Arnold Covey, Director Department of Community evelopment Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator VOTE No Yes Abs Church _ Johnson McNamara Minnix Nickens 3 O =2 COUNTY OF ROANOKE SIX YEAR SECONDARY SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION PLAN FOR FISCAL YEARS 2001-2007 and REVENUE SHARING FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002 VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (SALEM DISTRICT) L` T?.BLE OF CONTE?'vTS _4GEND_4 PAGES 1. SI_x YE,4-R SECO?~?DARY CO?~'STRUCTION PLA?v FOR FY 01-07 a. BOARD REPORT%'L~TTRODUCTTON 1-7 b. COU-'_~?TY~~IDE ITEMS 4 - RURR4L ADDITION UPDATE 5 - RLJR_4L ADDITION PRIORITY LIST 6-7 c. INCIDENTAL COi~?STRUCTION ITEMS d. NUMBERED PROJECTS 8 PROJECTS SCHEDULED TO RECEIVE FUNDLNG IN FY Ol!02 9-gib 2. PROJECTS ADDED/REVISED 37 ~. PROJECTS CO?'~TSIDER.ED/NOT ADDED 37 e. ~rDOT'5 SIX-Y-EA_R ROAD PLAN 38-45 2. R ~ VE?~TU`E SH ~_RING FOR FY O l -OZ a. BOARD REPORT. LETTER OF INTENT & INTRODUCTION 46-49 b, REVENUr SIi:4R.ING PRIORITY LIST A_ND MAPS 50-79 c. PROJECTS CONSIDERED,~NOT _4DDED 80 d. VDOT'S REVENUE SH`4RING FORM 81-87 ~~ ACTION f ITEM N'LiMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF TPIE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOIE COUNTY, VIRGIn~IA MELD AT' TIDE ROANOKE COU?~TTY AD'~IINISTR~TION CENTER MEETING DOTE: December 19. 2000 AGENDA ITEM: Consideration of Projects for FY 2001-2002 VDOT Revenue Sharing Pro Aram. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: E~ECI.TTIVE SUMIVI<~,RY: Staff is requesting the Board of Supervisors to approve the prioritized Iist of projects for the FY 2001-2002 ~-TOOT Revenue Sharing Program and authorize the Count~T Administrator to sign the letter of intent to participate in the Revenue Sharing Program for Fiscal Year 2001-2002. BACKGROUND: The V"irginia Depa--tment of Transportation {VDOT) annually provides localities the opportunity to receive state matching funds for the construction, maintenance, and improvement to primary and secondary roads in the state's highway system. The Commonwealth of Virginia provides ~1~,000,000 for the matching program and limits localities to ~~00,000 each. However, if more or fewer tran 20 counties participate, our share of money will be reducedi'increased proportionately. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: County and VDOT staff presented a proposed priority project list for the FY 2401-2002 Revenue Sharing Program at the November 14, 2000 Board of Supe~~isors work session. Staff'r~as adjusted the projects ~~i+Vh maps based upon the comments received at the work session on October 26, 1999. Staff was unable to acquire temporary easements necessary for some of the projects to be included in this year's prioritized list. Vve will keep these projects on nle and continue to acquire the necessary documents. • 4LTER'~ATI~~S ~NI) IMPACTS: • • I) Approve the proiect List and authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supen~isors or County Administrator to sign the letter of intent and defer appropriation of the funds (~>00;000) until July 1, 2001. ?) Decline to participate in the Revenue Sharing Program for Fiscal Year 2001-2002. ST_~'F RECOMMEND 4TION: Staff recommends alternative 1. SUBMITTED BY: Arnold Covey; Director Department of Community Development APPRO~-'ED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION _4pproved O Motion By: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To VOTE NO Yes Abs Church - Johnson McNamara _ _- -_ Minnix _ _ _ Nickens 2 AT A REGL~L_4R MEETING OF TFIE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROA_NOIiE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, MELD .4T TI3E ROANOIiE COUNTY ADMINISTR_4TION CENTER ON TUESDAY.. DECEMBER 19; 2000. • RESOLUTION APPROVAL A_ND ADOP'TIO>\T OF TIDE SECOND ARY ROAD SYSTEM SIX-YEAR CONSTRUCTION PL_gN FOR FISCAL YE:4RS 2001-2007 A_~!D APPROVAL OF THE ALLOCATION OF FUNDS FOR FISCAL YEARS 2001-2002. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on to receive comments on the adoption of the Secondary Road System Six-Year Construction Plan for Roanoke County for Fiscal Years 2001-2007; and the adoption of the Funding for Fiscal Years 2001-2002; and Vv'FIEREAS, the Board of Super~sors does hereby approve the adoption of the Secondary Road System Six-Year Construction Plan for Roanoke county for Fiscal Years 2001-2007 and allocations for Fiscal Years 2001-2002 as set out on the attached Secondary System Construction Program. NOS%, TFIEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution duly attested be forthwith forwarded to the Virginia Department of Transportation Salem Residency Office along with a duly attested copy of the proposed Secondary Road System Six Year Construction Plan for Roanoke County for Fiscal Years 2001-2007 by the Clerk to the Board. • COUNTY OF ROANOKE SIB YEAR SECONDARY CONSTRUCTION PL_~N FOR ~' 2001 TKRU 2007 l.a. INTRODUCTION: Roanoke County and the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) are continuously reviewing and updating the six-year plan. Staff receives requests throughout the year concerning secondary roads in Roanoke County. The requests are reviewed and classified as maintenance or construction. Maintenance items are normally referred to VDOT's resident engineer for correction. Construction requests are put on file to be reviewed during the six-year plan and revenue sharing yearly updates. These requests normally require right-of--way, additional funding and/or engineering. VDOT and Roanoke County staff have reviewed and evaluated each request for inclusion in the six-year plan and revenue sharing program. In deciding which projects would be included, staff considered traffic counts, existing and future development, pavement conditions, drainage, safety, and the economic benefit. We cannot fund all the requests received due to budget constraints; therefore, we have prioritized the requests based upon the criteria above. v Roanoke County received approximately 53.6 million last year. Roanoke County's budget for FY 2001-2002 is estimated to be approximately $3.56 million. Over the past couple of years we have seen an increase in our funding due to Federal changes. Even with the increase in funding, we need to be selective and supportive of the projects we identify on the six-year plan. Staff has included roads that are substandard and have a high, or potentially high, traffic count due to proposed or existing development. The Board of Supei-~~isors is required by state law to review and update the six-year plan every other year. However, due to funding changes in the TEA-21 legislation, VDOT has requested the Board of Supervisors to update the plan every year. As a review there are three funding categaries in the six-year plan: COUNTYWIDE ITEM, INCIDENTAL ITEMS, AND NUMBERED PROJECTS. Staff will attempt to summarize each category and project on the following pages: l.b COUl~'TYWIDE ITEMS: Items included in this category are traffic signs, entrance culverts and rural addition roads. Roanoke County's rural addition list (pages 6 and 7) is still very long. We have included the maximum ($180,000) allowed by state lav~T. An additional $270,776 has been allocated to handle traffic signs and entrance culverts for a total budget of $450,776. r~ ~~ 4 RURAL ADDITION UPDATE The following is a review of each road that staff has worked on or is working on: Signatures for temporary and permanent easements for BLUEBIRD LANE have been obtained. Speculative interest monies have been collected and staff has completed design plans which will be submitted to VDOT by the end of November. VDOT normally will schedule the work within eighteen months of acceptance of the road. Signatures for right-of--way for AUTUMN DRIVE have been obtained and speculative interest collected. Plans are complete and have been submitted to VDOT for review. VDOT normally will schedule the work within eighteen months of acceptance of the road. Staff plans to begin work on the next roads in the Rural Addition Priority List before the end of the year. The first is iCREEKSIDE DRIVE. This road has a steep (18%) grade as well as several utility conflicts and speculative interest also exists. ARTRIP LANE serves four families and will require staff to obtain right-of--way and drainage easements. It is anticipated that needed easements and right-of--way will be obtained and design work will begin in the Spring. Staff reviewed three new additions this past year. LEFFLER LANE, DOW HOLLOW ROAD, UPHILL DRIVE AND GREY FOX LANE have been added to the list. LEFFLER LANE and DOW HOLLOW ROAD. each serve three families. UPHILL DRIVE AND GREY FOX LANE serve 11 families. U 5 RUR,4L ADDITION PRIORITY LIST >=_ ~MILIES PROBLEMS *ESTIIv1ATED ROAD DISTANCE SERVED SEEl~r COST (l Creel;side Dr. 700' 3 18°io Grade. Speculaave Interest. S'_30;000 (?) Ari~ip Ln. 300' ~ Right-of--way and arainage easement 540,000 required. (3) Smoke}% P~idge Rd. 800' 6 Right of way and drainage easements 5120,000 required. Turnaround area; private propert}~ damage. (~') Indiar. Hill Rd. 1300' 4 Right-of-way and drainage easements $130,000 required: Speculative Interest {~) Hemlock Ave. 1500' ~ Right-oi way and drainage easements 510;000 required. Significant private property damage. (6) Raintree Rd. 2600' 16 Right-of--way and drainage easements 5326,000 required. Adjacent to Parkway. (7) Chestnut Mtn. Cr. 500' 6 Fight-of--way easements required. 550,000 (8) Southview Dr. 800' S Right-oi wa}~ easements required. 580,000 ~n%illiams Ave. 300' 6 Righ*.-of-way easements required. 530;000 ~. ~) Lucado St. 700' S Right-of way easements required. 587,500 {11) Ka`~h_--vn Dr. 790' 4 ROW required, stream crossing and 579,000 dilrficult horizontal alignment. (12) Cowman Rd. 400' 4 ROW required; homes close to road. 580,000 (13) Harmony Ln. 900' 8 Right-of--way and drainage easement y 590,000 required. (14) Aicoa Rd. 1109' 8 APCO lines, ROW required; Stormwater 5160,000 Management. (15) VJiliow Valley 3600' 4 ROW required; possible speculative 5360,000 interest, Stormwater Management. (16) Falling Creek 800' 3 Adjacent to Wolf Creek, ROW required; 580,000 Speculative Interest. (':7i P.ust<~ Rd. 300' 7 ROW required; steep terrain, sight $200,000 distance problems. 118) Crescent Ln. 1000' i 1 ROW required, Speculative Interest, 5100,000 Woodland Ln. utility- relocation. . F.iverview Rd. 1200' S ROW required, Speculative Interest. $120,000 (20) Broyles Ln. 500' 10 Possible Citizen Participation. 53000 6 ', ; o~msend Ln. 40C' ~ Sight aistance problems. $20,000 Ltier Win. c~0' 3 Drainage +~oncems. $1,000 ~P ~., ~l Dow ~-iollow Rd. 3000' 3 G'iden, possi'ole drainase concerns. $120;000 ~) Grev Foa Ln./C1p'rull 2000 11 Possible drainageigrade problems. $",'d;000 Dr. ne estimated cost is for construction of the road only. It does not include: Utility relocation, right-of-way, construction stakeout, :;ne.ering, o: rock walls. The homeou%ner and%or Roanoke Counn~ are responsible for these costs. • L J 7 l.c INCIDENTAL CONSTRUCTION: Items include minor construction that can be completed normally within one year such as pavement overlays, drainage improvements and minor curve improvements. Staff host not included any funds for incidental construction in the six-year plan since all incidental items have been addressed under the revenue sharing programs for this year. The use of the revenue sharing funds for incidental projects is based on the assumption that Roanoke County will participate in the revenue sharing program. If the Board decides not to participate in the revenue sharing program, staff will review the need to fund several prioritized projects (page50-79) from our secondary yearly allocation. l.d NUMBERED PROJECTS: The bulk or Roanoke County's allocation funds are for numbered projects. This year, staff anticipates approximately $3.1 million to be allocated toward reconstruction. The entire six-year plan is enclosed for your review (pages 38-45). Following is a summary of our current and proposed plan for next year: The following roads have been completed or received sufficient funds to be completed, and no longer appear on the six-year plan. RTE. 606-LAYMAN ROAD-RAILROAD CROSSING GRADE IMPROVEMENTS, FLASHING LIGHT AND GATE INSTALLATION IS COMPLETED. RTE. 669-PATTERSON DRIVE RECONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED. l.d.l. PROJECTS SCHEDULED TO RECEIVE FUNDING IN FY 01/02: THE FOLLOWING ROADS ARE CURRENTLY IN THE SIX-YEAR PLAN AND ARE SCHEDULED TO RECEIVE FUNDING THIS FISCAL YEAR: Priorities #0-12 are scheduled to receive funding this year and are highlighted over the next several pages. Priorities # 13-17 will not receive any funding this year. Priorities #18-19 are unpaved roads and will receive funds for paving this year. Unpaved roads are a separate account and the allocation is based upon the number of qualifying lane miles within each County. Unfortunately only 4.78 miles of our unpaved roads (23.24 total miles) qualify for funding because they do not meet the minimum 50 vehicles per day requirement. 8 Rt, 742 `~`L R ~~~~~ C~~~ ~ Rt.1574 have ~ ~~2 Rt ~ ~ ~~ 1~6, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS `r ~, Ceaar Rid ° Rd, Q ~1r 3 ~5 ~ ~ ~o ~ -s r,~ ~ <~ ~e ~ ~~ ~ N c~ ~ ROANOKE COUNTY SECONDARY SYSTEM SIX YEAR ROAD PLAN EEectr' ~~ ~~ , Rt, 419 d, Rt 163 - o Crest ~ `-~ ~ R~1638 ~~ ~~ ~S~o~f ~Z63~ ~,~ . ~~ Rt, ~ a > ~ ~ ~ a ~ ® ~i.. ,moo ~ `~ ~~ ~~ 66~ 22ti ,~. ~i McvITTY RaAD, OLD CAVE SPRING RaAD ~~} ~~T~~' ~i~~rlT~~ ~~ ~iQJ.V~~~~ ,~~~~~~ StX ~~ ~R ~~ ~ ~~4?~ ~~ .ti :4 ~h, 6r~ .~ .&E 4 /~~ ~~ 4!'r T P.:, v. b~' xr tt ~~f~ ok, ~~ f~ P~~~OSD If~PROV~M;=N TS ~~ w~ t~:~t''~ F~°% ~~ ~ ~~ ~G~ ~~ ~O~~ro eav~r~r~ ~ C,.bh ~' nEti V ;~~1 ~ '~i; ar,h~j r, ~'~, 1~b7 r 1 C~' Ol --f ~,~En`- ~ w ~ ~ ~" ~ `~'"~r~ir~c_~i~~d Lrt Mat ,ti ~ -5 r.,i ~ R ,,, k%QO~ blar~ler ~ =' ~ ~;, !~ ~ y`~:COCr~; ~ 1,S ~ ~ /+ ~ `vim ~ `t, `` c~ L, ~ti ~,~~, ~ ~ r~ ~x ~~~ ~~ 6~ Ly / ~~ Ln .~`~ `L ~ C'. -7 ~~~ 'r L~. Rt. 897 r~ ~~~2 ti Q~,. ~I ~/ C Gt."r ~~ ~4 ~O~ ~~~~ ~~ ~\ pr~OPOS~ D IMPROVr MINTS R ry `K ~~. ~ ~~ g04 ~~~~~1V ~~~~ I.d.2. PROJECTS ADDED IN FY 01/OZ: RTE. 679-BUCK MTN. ROAD.(PRIORITY # 5)-Reconstruction of 0.14 miles of Buck Mtn. Road from Rte. 220 to the intersection of Leffel Road (Rte. 804). Project will include realigning the intersection at 220 and improving the alignment of Rte. 679. RTE. 743-JOAN RICH_4RDSON ROAD (PRIORITY #16)-This project will improve the approaches to and replace the existing bridge over Garvin Creek. This project was added due to increased volume of traffic and deteriorating condition of the bridge. It will not receive funding in 2001-2002. RTE. 904-STARKEY ROAD. (PRIORITY #17)-This project will reconstruct 1.05 miles of Rte. 904 from the intersection of Buck Mountain Road {Rte. 679) to the intersection of Benois Road (Rte. 633). It will also reconstruct the bridge and improve the approaches of structure #6291. This project was added due to increased traffic and the potential for development along this comdor. It will not receive funding in 2001- 2002. I.d.3. PROJECTS CONSIDERED BUT NOT ADDED (INSUFFICIENT FUNDS): ADDITIONAL SECTIONS OF IJARDY ROAD: Staff will continue to monitor on a year to year basis. C.4RVINS COVE DAM ROAD: Frontage road adjacent to Interstate 81 at the end of Plantation Road, (future commercial potential). Frontage roads are not eligible for secondary or revenue sharing funds. The Board would have to request CARVINS COVE DAM ROAD become a secondary road. The interchange (exit 146) is being relocated ~~ith the widening of Interstate 81 and improvements can be requested at that time. HONEYSUCKLE ROAD: This is an unpaved road and only a short section of road meets the minimum vehicles per day requirement. Staff will continue to monitor traffic counts. BORON HOLLOW ROAD: Replace existing low water bridge on BORON HOLLOW ROAD. Bridge records indicate that bridge is in fair condition and even if the bridge would be replaced, staff does not anticipate the flooding problems to be eliminated due to the proximity of the Roanoke River and N & S railway TWO FORD ROAD, HERSHBERGER ROAD, MANASSAS DRIVE AND FRANKLIN STREET: Staff will continue to monitor these streets on a year-to-year basis. 37 • • N d ti- O ~ i a O ~ ~ w. A ~ d O ~ ~ O Q ~ U ~ A i R ~ ++ r.+ ~ O = H G V ~ _ '«+ U cn U W 0 H N m N LL U ti ~p C N N (0 3 ~ Z~ `m m U LL ~ c°c ~ o m rn u~'i o c'~ e ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ o ~ m o ~ N N c~~ O 0 o m c o m 00 °o v °o ~ m if1 ~ I~ O N V ~_ ~ ~ ~ m 64 N M fA E9 b9 69 E9 0 0 ~ o 0 0 O O O O t0 ~ N N N EA M fA fR ~ fH 0 0 0 0 0 0 N ~! ~ (O O O O O O O N N O N O O ti u'i 0 N a e b~ m m m m H i I ~ ~ I ~ o I i i I ~ I I i I I S I I ~ I I ~ ~i I I ~ ~ ~ I I s o I ~ I ~ U Q ( L ~ I = N E a ~ ~ W ~, I ¢ ~ I C i U m ~ LLI m `o 01 38 • NQN 'Y1. ^V V a U ro :D {Y .--. J }~ y N N ro ~_ O o ~ ..,i LLI "" .J } N r a a `o U W w Y C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ U C ~ U' ~ ~ O p O O o W z K N W v ~ a) co ~ `~ ~ 47 cp ~0 2 ¢¢ W Y Z v aj ~ ~ W~ x~j ~ h ~ p020 ~ roJmU O Y O Z m Yowl ~ 03°0 ~ w ~ ~~ ~ Q - ~ U ~ ~?QU 3 ~ w U ~N- ~ ~ ~ " p 32 _~ J~ w ~ j 00_i~o o 3 ~ Y >-~ 25 ~ ~ o ~ C7 Uwo- {- wf-U Hq } z w~ (~ VJ oa 3 ~ w K~WJ > ~-~i¢o° ~ w ~K ~ O cn u=. U a~~ ~ ¢~OU ~ U »W^S wU2o~ O U > O >~- <n ~n w ~ W ~ ~ 'U H o w w W ~ C U C ~u m O O V N O w O w N T O~ C ~ Ow W w n ~ O N O O N O w O w O ~ N a{ W O O O O O c7 O ~_ '~. Q c o r °o w J w o $ m J ~ ~ c ~ n ~ Q ~ w w 4 W N L Q V T o O w w O N w O O c C O ° O ~n LL ~* w R w w J ~ N u LLI O w O w < c G ~ ~ O O G ~~ ~ ~ o of a d ~' c v a w ~%+ N w N C C N ° 0 N w o ~ w m ti o C o °o w °o 0 °a °o 0 0 o w r L ` o o N a a N °g ~ W ~ C o m W w Q 1 !i ~ ~ 'a ~ ~ 0 a 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 ~ ~ ! '^ «A yl z V w 3 0 0 0 ~ 'A w 0 0 0 "~ o o ~ ~ yi w z y 3 0 o 0 w w 0 0~ t» z ~ o 0 w ~ o 0 oo o w w 0 0 0 w g o S °0 m m w w z ~, 3 0 o 0 o 0 o w o c~ M ~ m m 0 ~ n m rn v ~o w r» w z ~ 3 o a o o o v w w 0 0 0 0 0 °o °o rn o m o w w i» z 3 0 0 U~ o a s ~~ a ~ U ti a a U ~ a z o~ a ~ o ti a a O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O b9 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ~ O O N p U ~ N O O O O O O O O ~ yJ ~ N w ~ N w w O O ~ w w O O O O N O r N N 4Y w w O O O r N O O O r b O O O Vi O O M ~ N O O 8 W U1 o O r u1 N ~ T O K m r w O O ? N O O O O m 00 ~ O O y~ N M w ~ c w w 3 0 o w 3 0 o w tA 3 0 o w w w 3 0 o w ry 3 0 o ~ w Z 3 0 0 x U~ a a U ti a s U~ a ~ U ~ a a ~~ a a ~ a o U Z O m Z ^ Z~ ^ n r m~ ^ o r U~ W ~ O Coj ^ O O Z ^ O O Z W ^ ~ ~~ O ~~ O E O M Z~ O O m Z J O 3 LL N R~ N ~ N 2~ Z N ~ N O) m N O c9 # W Z v - V ~ ~ LL W O ^ O ~ ~ N ~ ^ Om LL W ~ Q O ~ j - F O ^ 2 m N U N O B Z J m~ 0 ON 4 m ~ ~ ~ ~ O d' F~ ~ F_ R, ~ Q Q t U m ~ ~ ° m o J ~ I 4. O O o o~ o ~ o 0 2 0 ~ , ~ Z Z o ~ a~~~ 2 o w o° = o w c° C „ ~J U a O l L j ~ N ~' Q W a # a 0 O ,~ y (n E - . ~ 'm V ~ O N (` W m H J Q O ... ~ m 0 N W m O F- 7 0 O O U 0 lL W O o N F- m O ~ N O~ V W = ~ m M ~ H J ~ ~ O m m CJ O ` W=~ F.. > ~ N~ m O ~ W A N m .. F- J # c¢ O N C) 7 U p a .? o a U = i F= in ° c¢ rn# ~ o F- o ~- ~ ~ U ~ ~ a` O c¢ a~ is o i- m ~c ~ ~ U ~ ~ a m ~ ~ ¢ =° ~- ~ ~ w rn# ~ d O c¢ o~ ~ o i- m .c ~ ~ U a> ~ a ~ ~ °_ c Q o~ o ~ ~- v cn ~ a` o~ o F- ~c ¢ 9 U m rt a cC a Q F 39 • • C Q '^~. V ~. a Z Q U o ~ ~ i N A Q ~ ~ U ~ ~ N W -~ o H to °o N r a Z Q U F ~ y ~ ~ f9 O ~ ~ - c N O U i o 0 o 0 o 0 0 0 o U V ~ N ai n o V n m 0 ~ Q co M ~ R II O ~O 11 U v II 2 m y h H Q ~ F= Q ~ ~ N Q ~ W N O ~ Y7 ° 2 tD `° ? Z r 'O } 2 p Z ~ `°~° '~ ~,,, 2 ~ O ~ w ^ ~ w '* w w N ~ '~ ~' U U U U Z O U U Z O Z O ~, O G - ~ w ~ u- U ~ a U W o a N y U ~ ~ ° ° w ow ° ow w y V N ° w w W O O w n ,V O KJ O N O w O O w w O A Ip' A M O w r U ° ° ° o o c o o ° ~ J N + o y M 0 T 0 O o h J Q p { w er w N w O w w N Q w O t1 O J U O 0 °o o °o v °o m c M W N O w I°D N n LL c ^ i ° w W w U w o 0 0 0 ! 0 0 p I" ~ °o °o o °o_ °o 0 N ~ d N O N ~ W ~ I 1 yi N ey N ~ p O N 0 o° w 0 °o w 0 °o 0 w 0 °o 0 w °o 0 < °o 0 °o w ~ .-~ ~ O e. O n O ~ O m N `~ ~ 0 O o ~? ~~ ~ w w w w _. C Q w ~ 7 N Q w ~ ~ LL O o o O ~ w O Q O w o S o N uI O N w w O o 0 O° w O O w o 0 O O w w O 0 ° ~ w O O O 0 0 o o °0 O O O .~- ~ ~ w w w O 0 0 D ~ w Ow O O 0 0 0 0 ~ N N ~ N w w O 0 0 O m w O n ~ ~ o n O fV N N ^ m w w O w O O O w w w O j ~' a w z ~ 3 0 o w z~ 3 0 o w z~ 3 0 o w z~ 3 0 o w z ~ 3 0 o w z 3 0 0 a ~ U~ a ~ U~ a ~ ~ I- a a U~ a ~ U I- a a ~~ C U a a~ o o O ° w 0 0 0 w °o °o N N cn a w w 0 o O ° w 0 0 0 " 0 0 t0 10 a w w 0 0 N «n 0 0 c~ o 0 0 0° O V V "' io rn w w w 0 o o O ° 0 0 0 w o o °0 Q < ~ v w w 0 0 0 ~ w 0 0 0 0 0 O n I°n is e w H 0 0 0 O O w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O ° I°n °r w w w ~ ~, w w z ~, 3 0 o w z~ 3 0 o w z~ 3 0 o w z~ 3 0 o w w z~ 3 0 o w z 3 0 'o a ~ ~ I- a ~ U~ a ~ U~ a ~ ~~ a a w~ a ¢ ~~ w p ~ Z ~ ~ ~ W °~ No K ~ m :°- ~ Z U W m m~ w U ¢ Z U o a E 2t ' O ~ r n t- N~ N N ' 2 W p ti W ro r I- N A N N W O O y W m ~ N O N N 0 p~ Q J Q a~~ N A N O w 0 p C J Q of N n O M O~ ~ U O O Q O N Z ~s .y, ~ } I- ~ O O (n V O o g= ~ Q ~ !n m V ~ °~5 ~ Q ~ F O ~ N Z Z W U N ~5 Z V O O N ~~ ~ Y O ° N m .~.. °' ~ lo -~ O > ~~ a o o ~ ~- d o O ~~ ''' F z o o -~ N a o 0 N~ F o U ~- m Z o ~ d LL ~ ~ g `r d u o O tD o h o O ~? y o U o o K o OU o?? o =N o 5 5 0 d N U E ~ m r ~ o' p '"-' N ~ ~ ti a # O O '= ~ N W W m N "' ~ m W = M ~ ~ ~ O ~ m ~ ~ ~ O w ~ ~ p p °O i !~ N ~ 00 W ~~~ a n o c Q m# N -¢ m# h ~ '~ < m u ° ~ . ., c a m~ ° ~ . . c a m~ c ° t . .. . F ° c Q of ~ ~ a Q ~ ~ a` ~ o v a-i ~ a` ~ °_ ~ y ~ a` ~ ~ v v~i ~ a` ~ °_ v ~ ~ a` ~ 9 v r~n ~ a` ~ ~ v m ~ a 'i 40 • • ,~ V ~. a Z H U o o Q' .-~ o r. i N N ~ L Z ~ Q O ~ U~~ W ~ o CA °o ~. N } Q 0 U W Y E ° m ~ N ~ N ~ ~ V 3 O O O O N ^ ~ ~ Q1 ~ ~ ° J r r Y d. ~ o h N ja r f W it ~~ U' ~ Y I U~ d ~ a ~ Y ~ ~ m ° ~ ~ o r o ~c ~ _ ¢ m } Y U a 0 3 ~, ~ ~ ~ o z w U m ~ z w 7 ~ ~ 2 o x~ ~ - U = U r w U p c m¢ F a~ ~ ~ ¢ ~ Q ¢J. LL U u c~ S o w w ~ ~ h 2 m ~ ~ ~ ~ Cfl w U 2 5 m ° a: w w 0 N 0 N N 0 ~ a :~ - C 9 J d C: r c c N a N o N 0 o w w w ~ Z O 'n ~ N o o ° w °o n N ° °o ' w ° ° w w ~_ O O '") O O O O J L7 o O co O o O N m i v ¢ C N M O N N w N N Q W } O O I O ¢ ~ O O O O O O O ~ o ° ° w ~ ~ o N w e N a w N w O ~ w 1 W ° ° 0 0 0 0 a -~ m a o 0 0 0 0 o 0 O 0 ~ O O N w N a N O N N ~ N N N N Q O O N O °o o m 0 °0 ~ y~ o 0 0 N a ? 0 ~ o o 0 0 ~ o° °- ~ N s~ C y G O '~ N Q `~ ~ ~ m N C m O O m O O O ~ ~ . ~ M - N N QW a' °i ~ ~ a N 0 VOy m N o 0 0 ° ~' ° 0 0 O O O ~ NN N 0 $ O m q 0 0 0 N N °o O m N 0 o iIl h 0 0 N N °0 N w 0 0 ~ W 0 0 0 0 °o °0 O O N N N O N 0 0 O op o 0 0 0° O O N m N 0 o O to N 0 0 0 o N o A u9 h O a w z ~ 3 0 w z~ 3 0 o w z~ s o o w z~ 3 0 o w z~ 3 0 o w z ~ o 0 a o a w ti w ~ o~ a ~ o ti a ~ o ti a ~ ~~ a a o~ o o S a o a ~ o o S S o S S o 8 S S S (,) ~ O M N O t0 1C ~ r n N N V N O m M Q N N j in ~ of ^ N N N N ~ N m N N ~ N W 8 ~ N ~ ^ m O N N N N O ~ H N N !R N N V E nl N N nj ~ N N ~ w w 2 m 3 0 w 2 m 3 0 o w 2 m 3 0 o w 2 m 3 0 o w z m 3 0 o w z m ~ o 0 a o ~ o~ a z o~ a ~ o~ a ~ o~ a w o~ a ~ o~ ¢ 0 0 0 0 Q ~ W o 2 ~ H 0 2 2 , D: ~ O > O~ J W m ~ Z U W N Z ~ W ~ LL (Op p ~ W O NO Ory ~ J N U ~ > W_ ~ O U Z a ¢ m n S O~ d ¢ U n O N W C m N 2 m U W a' U m m W W ~ E _' 2 o m m N 1- m > Z o r 3 m 2 0 .r = U o w ti m F m = U o w= m F U m U Q o F' Z m 2 Q m ' U Q ° ~- r m !Y K o m u ai ~ Z u Z O o N~ o ¢ Z o~ r oo ~ Z 0 2 V o ~ m o 2 Q °o ~ m ¢ o v~ aaam oo m a mo ~n z o ° g ~ o ~ o~ vi m O °~ O r o O °~ ~ 'Q a o Z O °~~ ~ ~n a o r R~ m ~ ~ m w o r ~ g o ^' O ~~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ o tm0 Z I~ ° ~ ~~ O O Z o ~ N ~p W j~ ~ ° ry a o ¢ I~ O W N 0 ¢ U ~ n N N o a a s a r¢ U o o ~ o o> m o 0 2 o m o o¢ U .- o c o c N N U E ~ y C O N w a# O O t~ n ~ N ... a° ° ~ c ` m 0 ' V ~ O N n ~ N W A ~` ~ N ^ N W tC m ~# er ry O ... A W l0 O c O ~ A O~ A W I0 0 ~ O ~ I. O^ U W !~ T m# C L U a d O C o a u >. >. ~ ` O ~ ~~ C a m~ o r m ~c v~ 2 a O ~ ~ 9 C¢ W# o r m ~c v v~ ~ a O C¢ ~ o ~- m s ~~ v~ 2 a ~~ ¢ I ~ o I- v ~- U m 2 a` ~ ~ °_ I Q ~ r ~c v w~ a ~ ~ °_ ¢ o~ v w~ a a a¢ r r a 41 `f` u C7 Z ~_ U o o F- N ~ Z ~ `a cO ,a C C N fW" "„ p fn o r N Q Z U W N O N 9 ~ O i C N ~ ^ U - ~ ~ r. N .~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ m ~ ~ ¢ w m 4 ~ Z ~ N ~ ~ w ^ 2 :J d a a ~ ~ w QW QO ` ~' F m ~ ^ Q v ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~w~2 0 . ~ Z N O ~ ~ ~ Z ~ b y ~ Z O2Z N ~ I, O o Z ~ ~ o ~ s a ~ o ~ ~ ~~u0~ Q U U ^ o~ _ ~ 2 3 ~ 2 v~i 2 0 2 w UoZo a¢ c ZO o ~ h_ o ~ o ~ o O ~00~ ~ o= °~ o N ~ U ~ w d' d ~ o U o~~ U~~ w a' a ~ - W ~ ~ w CL ° a amUw~ C j O J O w O w K W ~ G O O O O tp CO M ~.j U ~ ^ I 4 o 0 w ow ow c Q1 c w c m m °- w 2 n p ° 0 oo ~ w 0 °o w 0 v ~ ? w °o o ~ w ° o° n w O r U a ° ° ° 0 0 ° c J in O e p O o O o O 0 ~ O J ¢ e' o ~"~ ' w N w OOi w w w ~ ¢ N LLI J ¢ U LL V O ~ O p ~ m O p H w Om N w O O W w O O - w C O N w O c°v w w o 0 ° ° w 0 O ~ o °o °0 o 0 o 0 ~ 2 p 0 o~ w o w o n ~ O p 0 N 0 p p n 0 w 0 O o w C o vi ~ 0 m cn ~ a ~ °o ~ °o r °o °i a N °o '° O .,C., ~ ~ W M w Q ° w r: w :o c~ w Q ti ~ LL o a o a w w o a 0 0 0 w w c 0 o w 0 0 0 w w °o w 0 w 0 0 0 w w w 0 w ow o 0 w w 0 w 0 0 w w 7 O ~' a w z W 3 0 o w z ~ 3 0 o w z ~ 3 0 o w z~ 3 0 o w z~ 3 0 o w z 3 0 0 a a ~~ a ~ ~~ a w ~~ a a w r- a s U~ a a ~~ N 0 O 0 o m O O O o O 0 0 0 O O 00 O 0 O O o g g O O O O o O °o S °o O O O °o O S °o °o O O O °o O °o °o O O O U ~ N O O O O O N r N r h w e ~o w O O Nw O ~[] O V N rv i» Nw w O m w O m N is en v w M O O cn w O O p V] r r a e w N w O M VJ ~[f N w m rn w w O O e w O O O O ~D ~O m m r w - j ~ w w Nj V w w v ~ w W a 2 m s ° ~ a 2 m ~ ~ ~° a 2 w ~ ° i-° a 2 m ~ ~ ~°- a z `o c ° ~°- a z N ~ o O ~ ~ O m ro'i 'c ^ Q > r w z ^ U c ~ o ~ m ~ o ^ m > O ~ ` ~ U$ ° ~ w U ° m u Z O c ni O ~ VI o w r ° m V- W N ~ O o m 3 g m~ N ~ O 0 3 0 m m N O ¢ ~_ D rn o c m F~ F- N O a' ¢ ~ o Q m m Z N O d ~ ¢ Z w w o m H F-' N O d' d' G E N O ^ R Q d' m a' C = } Q K. O F O O = } , ~ .. m 0 C O ~ O ~ ~ ~- r O Z m~ N 0 O _ ~ H F- O O ~ a' ' O^ O N~~ O?? O ~ ^ ~ Z O ~ ^ _ t0 O mm O U O W ~ N Z Z O O j C~ r m o O- 0 O U Z Z N O Q a LL I- ¢ LL O O O C CJ UI U ~ O L 7 O ~ lL d ~ 0 N m ryV ~ N ~ m - ~ m ! J cG U o ~ 1 4 0 ._ 0 ~ C Q OI # - O ~ C¢ m h ' 0 ~ C¢ O~ ~ o H m ~ C d OI 3 o ~- m 'c 0 ~ C Q m~ o h- o - 0 ~ C a O1 # o t- ` - u ~ a ¢ a. >, !- r a` & o o r m u m ~ a` ~ o r d c g ~ ~ ~ a ct z 9 o N ~ a cr ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ o ~ m ~ a` ~ 9 u ti ~ a 42 • C a O J c {~- rj) <v Z ~ a :V ~ ..r O ~ C N Q G ^~ V U W N E O ~ C t0 ~ ~ U r C n U C ~p (D O O ~ In 4 U m m L m ~ N u] o J !C N ~ Q ~ u'i ~ II H R 2 ¢ ~ ~ o = m ~ z ~ ~ # ~ ~ ~ ~ M ~ p a j o ~ 21 H ~ O z # m ~ ~ ~ rL ~ m 2 ~~ w 2 2 y v~ ~- <n ~n W V W y Q E H LL m c~ O O O ~ ~ ~ o m j ° 0 m~ w w w w ~ T c`n ~ U a h a ¢ ao ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o m ^ °o o o °o o w o w y y V O n o n O M O A Q T c w w w r m ~ mU r o ~ O N 0 c q 0 o ~ w o °o o O o rn a ri N w n Z ~ ~ N O N O O ~ w O O O H O O O O O O N w _O H O O ° O W U o 0 o o w O J ~ Oi o O 0 ~ 0 0 Q ~ C N K w N (Y v u r J 1 ~4 .r Q °o m O O M e N w O c ~ iy ~ O N w u i- ~-' o ° gg o B ~ w ~ w w w c 0 ~ o N ~ V ~l O ~~ 1 c G N °w w w O w O °o 0 '^ O 0 0 c m °" ~ Ol ~ ~ C .. O O N V O O O N O O M N O O o N N O T ~ f0 ^w °-'~'~ w ~i _l~ c '~ QLLS ~ D C C a J J a 0 w w 0 0 0 w w ~ 3 0 o 0 w w 0 0 0 w w w ~ 3 0 o 0 w w 0 0 0 w w w ~ 3 0 o 0 w w 0 0 0 w w w ~ 3 0 o 0 O O h w w o r r O r ~ O M O C~ W ~ ~ O w z= 3 0 o S O ~ w o 0 0 O O O O O O N O ~ w w w 0 0 a ~ o~ a ~ o ti a a U~ a a o ti a w U~ a a o~ _ p g o 0 S o °0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 w o 0 0 o 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O o 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0~ o 0 0 0 o O ~ U ~ ll O N ^ _ O O C N ~ N w N 'V' w w O N w O O h O O Yi N w w O W w n '(f N N w w O N w O O O O Om N M N w o w o Q ~ V m w N Vi w ~ N 69 o ~ O fA w i ~ E w N w N ~m w w z m 3 0 o w 2 'm 3 0 o w z `m 3 0 o w z m 3 0 o w z ~° 3 0 o w 3 0 0 a w U~ a ~ U~ a ~ o ti a a o~ a ~ o~ a w U~ 0 0 a ~ 0 0 0 z z ~ ~ a ~ o m o o ~ N ° m ~ a ° U ~ z z ~ o z E ~ = p N O^ p ~ = l O N ~p ~- p O ~ O r p Op m Z O ~ O p~ O M $ ~ O Q1 J a i Q N = ~ W O J Q. (p ~ N (9 ik N ~ O 0 o - C o 0 O O - m - W r ~ ~ W O W tp r m W W O CL l p m W U O ~ ~ W V o ~ V~ ~ o _ O-~ E N ~ _ _ ~ ~~ O Y _ R~ U` ~ Y O~ N N m O a. ~ N m ~ ~'' 0 ~~ ~ ~ ^ O~ N Q y y Q O M N ¢ ~ N I C O` la- r~ 0 O Z m~ O O ? O _O w Z CL a LL F- Q ~ o 0 0^ 0 0 0^ U7 . O O m 0 ~ ) O?? O Y O? W ~ Y O LL" ~- C ~ N V E ~ ~ O L ~ G `p p T ^ ~ ~ ~ ~ v O U `N ~ g m `m ^ ~ $ `m ~ H W ~ m ~ N W ~ m ~ ~ a ~ o ro ° c O m u c $ c O or # O ° o "' a a # ° o '_' a c ii m ° ~ ¢ n # ° ~ ¢ a ~ o a v >. ~ ~ a ¢ F- H d ~ ~ o ~ ~- °_ U m ~ a` ~ °_ o ~ w ~cc v m ~ a ¢ ~ o ~ m ~c U ~ ~ a ~ ~ 9 ~- o t- U m ~ a` - ~ ~ ~- c - ~ N ~ a` r1 ~ c r m w ~ a m a~ 43 • r~ Z 0 U ~ ~ o ~ .--. O 1- N N ~ ~ L Z __ m 0 ~ (~ ~ L `~ O W F O N Q Z U W N E ° Y m ~ ~ ~ U ?+ n p ~ V G ~ ~ r Q r V U W CC > } ~ 2 U d ~_ tiW~ w v,aZ a W~ti uNi ~ N ~~3 ~ ~ O ~ '~' ~ Q ~ BOO W ~ W ~ W ¢~ Z O S u w OjOa ~ ~ (n y v a' O y O O J a O w C ~ G V !~ ~ I ~ O O N M n N C o N O O ~ O O ~ O H Q ° p o N p O O ~ J S `7 o va ~ N Q LLI J O C V p O U in o j N o LL ~. 8 o N C.~ w o ° U ~ o o O o ~ a Q No 0 Sri ;,, w N ~ C O N o o N N G 0 N W ~ C ~~ O O O O p ~ O ~ O1 m O j Q Q~~ m 9 LL O a v ~ o ° ~ a r p ~ g 25 °o g °0 25 0 U ~ y in o ui o ~ IA W N a o of e~ M ~ w K t0 C_ N w Z ~ ~ ° Z a ~ ~ a o ~ Z '~° E o a ~ .~ o a ~ o m at ~ ~ o w g ~ o w Z V ~. %a Y p °m g Y mo ~~ N m °1 O ~ U Q w N o ~ UU Q w o i o° 5 0 ~ ~ a w Q in ~ O ~ o h o .~ n O r- ~ o K o -- c .. CJ N U E ~ N ~ 7 Q ~ ll Q. ~ - N N y O O T (n E d Q~ O Q r W i ~ N ~ p W m = 7~ ~ p d C r ~ aQ I- m p a N N ~ ~~ a ~° d ¢ ~ ~ d c C Q ~ o ~ v~i ~ a -~ C Q V ~ ~ cn m ~ a` 44 C~ • o ~ ~ a 0 0 o~ ~~ c a ~ F ~ ~ mU m~ o o m m o~ r rn "' o ~ m O ~ N ~ ~ p ~ °rn r O ~ 'A ~ O~ m o m m ~ °o o °o o vi ~ rn m m rn cn o» !n Z ~ O N m lD V e9 O ~ N w M O < M3 cp (D ~_ H U ° m oo °o m m » N 0 0 0 l 0 0 J Q ° o of e ~ M o ~ $ ' rn o w o v '. ~ N ° w C7 w ~, J ¢ U ~ o ~ m vi O o n O o m M m o M ,ri ~ o ~ m0 m N 'fl ~ w t00, m N D w o N v to m ~A v M U ° U Q' ~ o F- N o LLl p o o m w °o o °o ~ j o m o» Z R~ a o < o O ~ N ~ m o ~ ~ O o ~ ~ ~ U v L N W _y O O m ~ m D ~ O ~ N O Q ~ t tO lV rn C7 rn P N p u i m Vf v fA c '~ ~ N O N ~ N O m ~ Z Q C m~ W O O r `r V r r ch N o U o ~ ~ ~ -, u c n r i_ , O~ ~ ~- j ~ > d a` ~ o N r (A o S M ~ e r o ~ ~ ~ M V ~ br9 ~ ; y U ~ N O ~ O rn O o r O ~ N V O o (~J ~ E . r N v~ O] V ss O (O e3 W V ~ y w ~ d ~ p O U ~ U ~ m ~ m 6 m Q ~ o F 'om ~~ O Y O !~ ~ C m m N ~ ~ ~ F N O ~? C C ~ d U K p U a a N 0 0 O m d 45 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROAiVOKE COUNTY, VIRGINLA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING D ATE: December 19, 2000 AGENDA ITEM: Public hearing and adoption of the Secondary Road System Six- Year Construction Plan for Fiscal Years 2001-2007 and the allocation of funds for Fiscal Years 2001-2002. COUNTY ADMLNISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: E~CL?TINE SUMM 4RY: Staff is requesting the Board of Supervisors to adopt the attached resolution to approve the Secondary Road System Six-Year Construction Plan for Fiscal Years 2001-2007 and approve the allocation of funds for Fiscal Years 2001-2002. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: In accordance ~=ith Section 33.1-70.01 of the Code of Virginia, as amended, the Board of Supervisors is required to conduct a public hearing on the Secondary Road System Six- Year Const-action Plan to receive public comment. The plan before the County Board of Supervisors was presented to you at a work session on November 14, 2000. At the work session, County staff explained the evaluation process for inclusion of projects in the plan, reviewed the estimated funding for the next five years and the distribution of this year's allocation (53.56 million} among the three funding categories. Staff is now requesting the Board of Supervisors to conduct the Public Hearing and approve one of the following alternatives and impacts. • 46 • • ALTE.RNATIV'ES A1>\TD IMPACTS: 1) Conduct the public hearing and adopt the resolution approving the Six-Year Secondary Road Construction Plan for Fiscal Years 2001-2007. 2) Conduct the public hearing and defer approval of the Six-Year Secondary Road Construction Plan for Fiscal Years 2001-2007 until staff can review (if any) additional comments received at the Public Hearing. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative 1. SUBMITTED BY; APPROVED BY: ?~rnold Covey, Director Department of Community Development ACTION Approved ()Motion By: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred To Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator VOTE No Yes Abs Church _ _ _ Johnson _ McNamara _ _ Minnix _ _ _ Nickens 47 • LETTER OF I1!'TENT (Date) Mr. James Givens State Secondary road Engineer 1401 East Broad Street Richmond, Va. 23219 Re: County Primary and Secondary Road Fund (Revenue Sharing Program) Code of Virginia, Section 33.1-7~.1 Fiscal Year 2001-2002 -County of Roanoke Dear Mr. Givens: The County of Roanoke, Virginia indicates by this letter its official intent to participate in the "Revenue Sharing Program" for Fiscal Year 2001-2002. The County will provide 500,000 for this program, tc be matched on adollar-for-dollar basis from funds of the State of Virginia. The County worked with its Resident Engineer and developed the attached prioritized list of eligible items of work recommended to be undertaken with these funds. The County also understands that the program may be reduced on a pro rata basis if requests exceed available funds. Having requested the maximum amount of state funds, the County further requests the opportunity to match additional funds if they are made available. Sincerely, • Elmer C. Hod¢e County Administrator pc: Jeff Echols, Salem Resident Engineer, VDOT Arnold Covey, Director of Community Development; County of Roanoke Attachment: Priority Listing of Projects 48 • REVENUE SNARING 2.a. IN TROI3UCTION: The ~%irginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) annually provides counties the opportunity to receive State matching funds for the construction, maintenance, and improvement to primary and secondary roads in the State's highway system. The Commonwealth of Virginia increased the amount from ten million dollars to IS million dollars three years ago for the matching program and limits localities to $500,000 each. However, if more or less than 20 counties participate, our share of money will be reduced/increased proportionately. Roanoke County and the Virginia Department of Transportation staff have been continuously reviewing and evaluation sheets and drainage requests throughout the year. In addition to reviewing citizens' inquiries, staff contacted Roanoke County's Economic Development Department, Utility Department and VDOT's area superintendents. VDOT and County staff have reviewed and evaluated each request received for inclusion in the revenue sharing plan. In deciding which projects would be included, the following criteria were used; traffic counts, pavement width (18' or greater for plant mix) existing and futtu-e development, overall pavement condition (alligator cracking, depressions and utility cuts}, drainage, vehicular safety, and the economic benef ts. Following is our pnonty of projects to be completed m the summer of 2002 or beyond. • 49 1r~ • • • • • RQANaFCE GGUNTY UESiG1~~4TlC?N OF FUNI3S FGR FY Q'i-Q2 RE~IE?~UE SHARiI~.G r°~\v ~. ~~ o C~f~PLETED ~ °REVIOUSLY ~~ ~ ~~~ d ~~ , ~ ~ ~~ op co ~~Q c' w y 1,~~,0 ~ ~ Q ~~ 0 O r ~+~• c L~• o Rt,1124 Q ~ ~ r o e ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~~5 -~ a ~ 2~ ~~32 ~ Q,~~ 0 1~ ~r ~~ e ~~, ~ ~12°~ .- o~ R ~~~ ~ -~ o~~ ~ ~ ___ ,.--- PROPQSED IMPROVtMENTS R~,6~1 llr ~ ~ ~ x ~Q ~ ~ w ~~~ d~ ~ ' ~- rp r~~ry ~ -~ Rt.1~-~ 8 • C I • /R x,1516 Rd. ~ R x.,1653 Lipps ~- ~ ~~ o f~e~'dow ~ 1516 Gre ~ ' Ayrshire en ~ " ~ ~~~ i Dr, £ lea do ~' ~ Fyn Shia 6~6 /' ~ . ~~" ~ Y~~z~K, ~ ~ROAf~Of~E GOU~fTY DESIGt~AT[Oh! OF FUNQS FOR FY 0'!-~2 RE~JEf~UE SHARff~lG Q . ~ ~_ Castle Rock Rd, ~ ~ ~,~ ~ Shorthorn .fir q ~ ~~ ~ 5~ ~ . ~~, Q~ ~.Q~ Q~~ ~ ~ ~ Luwana Dr R-c,1 ~~, GY~ o~ ~ q ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ° ~~ t Rr ~~o~ ~ X; `yo- ~ ~'~ ~ ~ ~~- ~~ (~.° Can per Cr ~-~' ~~~ ~t,~15°~ ~~' `` .o ~-~,. . ~~~~~~~~ PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ~~~'~ • • ~a~,n~~~~ coU~~Y QESIGt~,~OTdat~ OF FUNDS FOf~ F`t 0'~-~2 REVENUE Sf~,4RlNG 2~ ~ R y.~a p Q1 O S 0 '1 ~- ~~ ¢~ ` o PROPOSED -MPRavEr,~E~TS ~ ~~~`~ ~~~ ~~~~ ~~ • • • RO~NO~ COUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY ai-a2 REVENUE S~4RING ~~ I I . X. ~~ ~ 1 X~ I ~( Q~ a, ~ C ,o ~~ ~~3 ~ ~ ~ ~~' p~,~ ~ ~ Sal . o Q y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~,~~~~ ~~ ~ - ~ o ~ ~ c d \ ~ -~- ~ s N ~ ~ r0 ~~ ~- ~~ ~-~ ~ ~ PROPOSED IMPROVEIv1ENTS ~~N~ ~ N. • • ROANOKE COUNTY DESIGNATfON OF FUNDS FOR FY Q'~=U2 REVENUE SH~-RING ph~c ~ ~~s ~~. ~ ~ ~4 T ~ /~h -~ h U~ Q ~% ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ?`~i ~ .993 ~ 3 ~~ ~~ , ~ ~ . ~, ~ ~Q ~ -~ ~' ~ ~'f~ ;~ ;: ti ;~ ~ ~~ ~- ~, ~." ~~ ~ PP.OPOSED Ih~PP,OVEfv(ENTS • ,~ ~, ~~ ~~ ~'~ b ~ ~ ..~~ 1~ Fl w • ~k~ ~%a ~`~ ~t~~`n ~'~ I °~°c ~R'. ~a ~ o~ e~~r~~~ ~~s~~~~~~o~ o: ~~r~~s ~a~ 0~-02 p~v~?~v~ s~~~~~~ G ,mob ~~ ti°' w t i*~ ~ioJ ~ ~. rte ~c ~~ ddb r.~~g ~i ~~ ~~. zr ~ E, ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~. r ~°' ,~{ ~~ .c ~xr re-~ ti°}~ ~~ >~ ux ~x ~~ jt'4' l ti ` ~^ G ~ ~~ f .~' r T~ .&' .Q PROPOSED IMPPOVEMEN ~~~~1 ~ ~ ~~~~~ Ra~~€}k~ COUNTY aESI~NATIaN ~~ FUNBS FaR d1-Q2 R~~~IvUE S~4RI1`~G -,rlc'~VQ~~, I ~ I / i• i• I• 1 L°~re~~ Rd. ~~~ \~S F~Q~A~C?KE ~UUE~TI~ ~ES~Gt~ATIC~t~ C)F FU~IC~S FAR F~ Q~-Q2 ~'cV~~UE S~~4F~~~G Hor~ewood Cr ~ R~:.1745 ,~ aD S4ddte Ln Ln L . a Rd a~ t~ w ~vG~¢`' ~~ w ood ~~ i ~oodbr~ p1 X' ~ °~ ~ ~ a <y~ a ~ h ~ s Rd. ~~ ~ ~ yr ~.`2~ ~~ C~2 ~ _.-,_ ~ I Vatley CL~`{,gD Rd n J~¢ a~'~~a io ~ ~ ~n ~~ Rd M~~ry4a~r t~~~ PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ~'t, ~ ~~S Rd, Co ~ ~~o~ ~ . / ~ y ~~:~ ~~ • • • C] R0,4NOF~E CC)Uf~TY DESIGNAT14~1 OF FUI~CS F~3R FY 0'~-Q2 RE~fE~UE SH~Rif~C a ~ ~ ~V J ~ Pine ~ vale r~ ~9- ~. - F!, / / f\~ / ~~ -~ ~/~ ~ B< ~~`~` P~ e 1~°2 ~ ¢ `~~ ~ o ~C,°~^ ~ s P•t ~c1~p2 C ~ Q ~ A~ ~ ~L~ yL ~ ~ CaS~le Ca ~~° a~ ~°~ -so ~~-4- ~~ ~ o S~ ~ ~ ~ C~ 9 ~ A v p ~~ o- 4 ~~ ~ ~~ ~ (,2r° ~a ti~ee r. 5 ~ ~~ O~ q ~ ~ Rt.l yfl~re o` ~' ~` ~~ti `Z ~p a ,~ Geor9~ y s~ C~_ ~ k~~~ ,~ ~q- ~~' o cr SD ~~ '~ ~4' Tlr~ ~ ~ P~^ ~e.~~. ~~~v w, ~ ~ t', ~r Old '~~'2 ~~'~, ~- `n ~ ~ ~ ~~` m ~ a ~ \ ~ . e`` 2~ P ~ ~~ ~y mow, o ~ P ~~ ~ 4~~ ~ Q V ~`` do ° /~ O~ O . ~' ~ p< <. . xo~ ~~ `S o~ wb b ti rr ~'" 1~ti js ~'~ P~ ~ ~'' C ~~ ~.~~ ~~• mac, ~~ ~ ~~, r 9 aW~ " ~ Or., Rd ~ ~ ~\a` ~ w r C a ¢. h ~s Q a ~~ 1~ ~4l ~h G° ~6 -~i lP ~ ~ Rt, 72~ ~ p4r(tk, ~~ 1 ~ ~~ ~9Q ~~. D~ °~~ ~~ SV~ J6-)~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~.J ~ ~~~1V ~~ PROPOSED IMPROVEt~E(~TS ~~~~ ~~~~~~ • • i• i• i• ~Q~~Q~~ ~~~~~ BES1G[~AT{OI~ OF FE~hIQS F~}R FY 01-02 F~E1tEl~~E SH,~F~tt~4 ~~~ ti~ ~d ~~a ~~ ` ~~ ~r G -C ~ ~~` w2 ~C` 'I~ ~ ' r 1~ j ~C ~ ~ ~ 9 ~-~ =t ~ - ~, ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~` Q~ ~~ ~ Qh~ 2~ ~~ ~ 10'; °~s <,`e~ PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS _~ ~ 10%~ ~,~:~ ~~ ~o~ ~~~~~T ~~ ~J RaAr~a~~ caur~sY ~~SIGNA i IOI~ OF FU~I~DS FaR FY ~1-~2 RE'~E~UE SHARf~~ ~~ o~` ~ `~~\/ C ~~ ~.~~~ Cr ~~ o-~ ~~ ~~ y ~ ~ ~' ~~ 0 .~ ~~ J PLO CMG ~_ _~ ¢,~,. ~~ Ho~Eins Cour-'t Cr, ~ ~5 ~ - ~- ~ ~ S a ~~~ ~ ._ ~ doh ~~~ ~'~ P ~ ~ .T •f? PROPOSED IMPRQVEMEl~ITS ~~~~ ~~~~~ Z.c. R04DS CONSIDERED. BL?T NOT FUNDED: Manassas Drive, Elbert Drive. Keagy Road, and Harborwood Road were considered but funds were insufficient. Staff added another section of Pitzer Road but funds were insufficient to complete the entire length. ~~e will revie~~ the remaining sections again next year. College View Court and Hollins Court Circle were considered but fiords were insufficient. The streets in Glenvar East and Penn Forest were considered but funds were not sufficient. Remaining sections of Harborwood Road will be considered for addition in next year's plan. Prior to last year's list Economic Development requested a traffic signal be installed at the entrance to V 4,.LLEY TECH PARK. VDOT is considering this as part of the Rte. 11/460 Improvement project. This concludes our presentation on the Revenue Shaz-ing Program. If you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact VDOT or our staff. The public hearing will be scheduled for December. ~_J 80 I 'i ~~ N ~..~ ~ ..r ~ :~ z rI •~ ~ w y ~~, ~~ ^r'~ Vt r~l H ~ U .ter C' N ~ iJ' f 1~. f~i l r: ~ ~. N ~f ~~ I~ A 1~{ L z z ~``~" z z z z z z z z z z ..r < < Z ~ ~ ~ L :j ~ o ~. O ~ ~ ~ o o ~ o o > > > > ~ > ~ > > > = `> c a > ` X Y, iG Y, X Y. X 1C X X , ~, z 2~ L c}i,~ 2~ .2 s _ ~ u 2 c}i~ _ ~~ 2 y 2 y _ ~ o'> i- ,.. ., r a c. a a a o. 'c. ~z_ z c z ~ r r ~- ~- ~ r } ~ ~- ~:~ <` ~:: :~ o> z z z z z z z z z z z Z ,. J i y t/1 (/] ~ V` V: to VJ fn V1 fn G c z v v ~, .` Ci G o a ~ ~ ~ o c o 0 s L N N N N N r ^~ M > ~ O O O O O O ~ O O c ~ O O G O ~ m 0 W O O O O n O Z O `r Y N ~ CG -~ r N C ~ r ~ o y ~ ~ 5 ~-' ~ F4 ~^ -' o n' O ~ C .. ~' -- ~ n L N - ~ ~ `~' ~, ^ ~ N 0., _. r 2~ ~ µ: •- ;~: - W W - W .-" W ' W - W ~ :r: ... ,^; [:.7 - ul - H` '-~ W ~ r txi _] ~- ~ H p W - ~ - r W c W W ~i ~ F- o W W W f""' ~ i,""' W z W [al F- W ^" !xl Z ` ° Z a z~ z c z= ~ z C Z ,- z~ Z Z z z 5 x O~ Z O G ~-- Z~ z N N ~ ' _ ' O W C O O O `=~ F c~ r O G `, c O a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .- d ^ Y, ~n m v ~ e ~ Y v .., W M i i. v ^J 4 C o -r r O rn O r O C ~ b O ~ O o N1 O h N O M N O Z ~ r+ Ci O C C O ~?. ~ I Z L T c ` r ~ a- r r r r r ~ r .. z a- .. C--z C ' + e < ¢ C ¢ d < ¢ Q ` ` C A L z z z z z z z z z z ;~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ o o ~ o ~ Z ~ vi T _, N ^ ^ N b vi Y uz`= 4 G 69 6? 65 t9 69 6°! Vi 69 69 49 Z r ~ _ ~^ O O ~p ~ O ~' O O~ ~ N "~' N ~p ~ ,~ ~ rv ~ ~ N ~c ~n c Z d ~^ '. cL z 0 K - C ~ ~ ~ ~ v C c C. Z S+ N, LG N L ~ rf ~ = m ~ N ~ ~ L N ~ ~N .o ~ °D ~ L W .~ ~ rn ~ M o . s L CL, m ~ ~ x _ , ' > _ ~ 3 ~ 3 u ~ m _ p - . 'r ~ ' G~ -~ c W' ~ > m c~ ~ ~~ ~ tit - ~ W ~ ¢', -' ~ W ~ W a W c W~ ~ ~ o O~ V W ri a "~ ~ w o a W °w W u: . a Z C o, :a G o, ?r a C ~ y. ~ ~ ~ Y~ ~ :L ~ 'r ~ ~ ~ Y a X ~ Yr.L a d 'T' cC o. ^.. ~ a C a: W G, "~ G o, K U l rn ? ~ Cn rn O~ fn c P. V rn O~ VJ O rn O~. !n O. ti O~ O~ rn cn T ~ O~ rn~ O. O~ ~ O. O~ v P ~ O~ ~ ~ Lb ~ ~ ~ r_ r ~ ~ ~t~ 81 • :_.~ N L u :., ru/ °z Vl ~~, (~ ~~ /~\ ..y ~../ V ~ ::.~i ~ ~ T ~_ C~ N r~ ~..~ ~{ ~_ G i~ Q 4 .rr L-; ~N !H rV ~ '~LJ ~f -^ z ? - - ~ r z z z z z z z z z z < G Z ` M ~_ ._ ,_ '~^, J ~ C O C O v^ O C O O ~ c c ~ ~ x x x x r, x x x x x Z ~ ~ ~ N ~ y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ 2 N 2 x .. ~ z~ z~ z~ z~ z~ z~ z~ z~ z~ z r Z N a° z r r r r } r r r r r c ~ rv w :: > z z z z c V~ z z z z z z > ~. z [- - z ~ rn ~ ~ h ~ in h rn rn ~ C O .., C j ~..% ~~ .: G C P ~ ~ Or ~ b 000 m O O h 7 ~ ^ r. r. y v a. J d. U c:. U w ~ rr U i- v- U ~ N t^ V1 V] N N V] Vi t/] ^ N N y I I ~ N IL' C W ~ W- G W _ ~ l:1 -~ ~ .-. ;;] - O u] W~ C W ~ W~ ~ W ~ ``•"' W S W- z~ _ ~ `- W z~zw W W zrz~ W z~o W ~ z~-~ z W `~ ^. ~ z W gE" ~ N z W-a - x zw-^ - ~ ZUi a ~ ` .. ~ ~ N o a ~ ` ~ v' M M ~ ~ ~ N a C m ~~ c n r n ? L i ~ O ~ O N O Z ~, v O O O O O ~ O O O O r ~ > z '" ~" r r r r r r r r r r 3 r.. r F^ C ' ' ' ~, ?" i E Z 4 4 4 ~V 4 Q E `1 Y~ z z z z z z z z z z F r ~„ ~ < O- v .~ o b 00 a [~ aG r O' z~ h M ~ ~ b N O t~1 G - ~zd; a C V1 69 fro ir9 fR 6? H fr9 L? K rZ'. !~ G C' 0 F Y~ K1 'S. ~ -r ~ ep W ? h ~ Or _ r :~ ~• ~ ~ ~ ~ N O Ni O •~ Z J C C CV Z C ~i i5 EA K b9 K K M1° 49 fA fP, 4~ ~~ ~°~ z~ Ate, ~ ~_~ ~~ ~ ~_~ ~ 4 C y ~ ^ _ C. N L O_ L~ ~ L C N L [; ~ o L r~ L L~~ L '"J N O `^ U ° - ~ C ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ 3 m s O ~ 3 v L O .., ~ 3 w I- _ o L° m ~ cG ~ p W . N ~ ~ m IZ ... ~ ~ w ~ .. ~ ' ~ ~ ° z w O h o s O ,1/ _ i l ~ e, t G B H o, uw cL ~ C~ ~ ;, W _ C ~( ;, cL ce O `~ L. o, ~ ~ O C' ~ c. W _ 0 CL' F' o'. w ~ O O ~-" ;, x z O Z -- o, ~ ~ O '~ r-' o, u+ rL C. ^~ ] ~~ ,,] P ~J ; a G' ( y LCD CL c~ C ~ a ~ ''~' a ~ ~ rn ~ ¢ rn Obi U ~ U ~ ~ Obi G ~ p V rn U C.: V [r.1 w GG c0 OG h K { Vi sz z ~ i . z ~; ~ ~ r z z z z z z z z z z v < z ~ - - ~ o o ° r ;, c ,~ ~ ~ ~ > > ° > ~ > > > ° > ~ > > . X X X X X _X X X X_ 7C I Y v ~ = ~ v ~ ~ ~ :- 4 ~ :' ~ 4 ~ ~-. a E ~ :- a ~ ~ F a i ~: F Q e ~ x 4 ~ a G ~ _ i r r Z ., L Z r r r r r r ~- r r r v: w c V z z z z z z z z z z z Z ,., U C t i ~ v v, v ~n in v; h cFn ai ~ C O C ~ ~ ~ ? F 1 ~ tV ~ S ~ ~ F"I .-. ` C ~. Q C ~ - c c v'1 c~ C R Yt 0 N N 0 O r ~ ~,= /~ ~~ c' ~^ O ~ N C. ~ w,+ t V ~ ~ ~ ~ Vv] p !G/i ~~ "- iV N N ~ O C G r N vOi C ~ G •~ N G O ~ C -a N r G ON O ~ O NN~. O~ ~~•' O~ C Cy ~ O~ i ~ C - ~ _, ~ `O^ Z `~ ~ r~l ,G^~ „r C ~o V.1 `i - C ~ ~ ,`,.~]_, y C C e u=' - ~ ~ Lct ~ G W -~ Ci1 i... "~ ~ ~ L L•U W - tV _ ~ FW' W ^ L'd E-. W v u] - L o W w ~ ` Z ~ Z I Z - Z Z H Z. ~ y ~ ~ '~ N Z, - Z C ? E- Z cG ~ Z c- w` © Z F - c'. c mC.' i- F ~ a' o ~ ~ ~ C C ~ ~ ~ C ~ J ~ C a' O a ~- a ~ w O G r~ ~ "- F- ~" m - ~'- ( - - r z ~ .~ ,. N C O o M o 0 0 ~~ C 4 m rn n ° m m ~ ~ .. -l ~ T ~ ~ a ^ N ~ m N "~ Z Z _ C O C O O O O N O O O O + ~, L- C ~. y > Z m ,. =' r r ~. r r r r r r r z - s 3 h x C ~' i 1 G 4 Q ¢ 4 4 ' ~ z E z d z o V -: Z a z z z z z z z a ~ h _ N < [~ ^ O ~ W °~ ~_ w ~ ? m ~ m~ N ~ .-. ~ b .~ Q~ W ~ N L ~ O C ^ ~ V Z ~ ... 55 55 c.5 ~ 65 c5 cs ws c~ cs ~ z C ~ N ~ ^ ~ z ~ -. eo ~ c m ~ _ m O~ a ni ~D ~ - ~ v N ~ rn O o o~ ~ y '" - n J ~ J ~ ~ V `~ V3 6S K 65 e9 69 65 F , 65 d: iP, S9 v ? . -_. ~ ~ s C ~ ~ ? C ~ Ci r ?~' C G C ~ 5 'n ~ z c ^~ ~ ~ m ~ _ -^ r, ~ o ~ ~ W ~ ~ D O ~ a o ~ ~ o ~ J U •, ^- ~ ~~ W ~?rw ~~ m - - 6 c 4 ~ 4 ~~ W o..w ~w W ~ w .~ W - 0~ o ~w 3W -~ ~ Z '. _ c G ;.. ~ < ~ a S~•~G~ ~ °'~ ~ d o, ~ ~ o. ~ p' d, x ~ o Y ~ o, Z ~ o~'~ q '=- --~i C, C p a• C rn~ rn 4 ~~ ~ 4 ~ J rn~ rn 4 rn U rn O o - rn c fi3 'h .~ C Z C ~ it, r^ Z^ ~1 1~ ^~ ,~,11 V ~z ~~Q -1 r- J ~ p V1 ~ A 'r ~ ~. ~. ~ ~. ~1 ~"~ ~ r~ -N-i ~~_ z z z z z ~ z z z z z _ N Z p i C > C > > > > > > > > 7 > ~ ~ ^ Z >` ~ ~ ~ X ~ ~ X_ 2 h _X ~ ~ X 2 y >C ~ y W ~ 4 W ~ „a ¢ W CV X 2 ~ X_ ~ ri •v G Z ~ Z z vii Z ~ Z ~ _ _ Z v, W ~ c. Q ~ ~_ z, ~ 2 ~ ~ _. .~ C c C c ' L n - ~ c. c. ~`zN y z ~- r r r r r r r r ~- ~'- ~ z z z z z z z z z z z N~ V 'z ~ ~ r h r ~ ~ i F C O ~ v: v i ~n ~ v i n v i c n c ~ ~: ~ o ~ °o 0 0 o ._ N c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N _. ~ 7 ~ 0 0 ~ c o o ~ ~ o La. ~?„°, W z 3 W z z o~ c o o W N o Z ~., ~ c W rn ~ [tl v, . ~ ~ vc^, 3 vN, a ~ ~ W N ` O E ~- ~ ~ G ¢ N v: ,-, a - c, ~ c 2 rn h ~ FC oO°o ~ 0.' °' C `~ G ~ '- C h 2 r - ~ ~ - ~ m y ~ ~ ~ ? ~ 2 ~ 2 z v~ ~ z am . c1 ~., W t W ^ v" - W W N W G r Z L7 ~ ~ Z Ti o W Z U c ~: ; Z ,.:: rn_ y: 1 c~. ul - Ll W ~ o `•'J o "tL~- - L:7 . ~ 0 `" C ~ N ~. z C''1 Z '- z ~ z O W ~ G ~ ~ G rG G L.. ~lJ ~. ~ O - Ly ~ ~ ~ v. ~~ - ~ ~ k r" W ~' _^ - z !=' ra ~ ~ ~^ ~_ m m m m O ¢ O °° N e Z~~ ~_i L- .~ '~ o 0 0 0 o c Z o 0 0 Z :z i z c r r r r r r r r r r ~- ~ ~ ~ c a~ ~ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ Z ¢ Z ¢ 'Z ¢ Z ¢ Z C Z i Z z Z Z Z J ~ ~. u' - ~ m o, O N ~• m O v O, ~ rn 00 O o Q N t~ n ~ z ~ ~. ~p N Oi ~ N ~ ^ Z f5 6A K 69 65 69 (A f.9 69 69 65 Z ~ v m ~ N m O ~p O. 00 O~ W O N t'~ ~ Pl G. ^ ~ r [~ V' ? N ~ O, N ~. 00 N O~ [~ - L ~ z ~ c J r` J cs c5 w es cs ~, c5 z9 vi ~+ C ~ ~ LJ z r.. ~~ ~ C ~ ~ ; W C C ~ .~ N ~ r N L Z G ~ z v' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m m ~ . V' ~ ' 0. CO y a L .~1 r -. d C v, c W- p~ -' o z- -o' z -' o J: ~ N G '" ~ O~ o Z o ... ~; ~ C Z o Z !- W ... o z ~ ° t`na cG o ~ [~ Z o°', 3 Fc' Z ~ ~ a' ;'" ~ a ~ ° Q C Qo', ~ Q oc', Y a Z ~ C ~ rn rn v rn~ ~ rn ,.7 rn rn p~ J rn. W p, ~ ¢ ~^ ~ U m rn a rn rn rn~ . ^~ rn rn V rn rn O p. a O^ i n 1 m r m I( ~ 1 cA 84 ~~ i:r ^. ~.A O ~~-+ /..' ? ~ z~~ `~ o ~~ ~zu -N _y `~ r ~ ~ N V T~ ~~r/~~ V1 ^~ i~ ^~ i r^ V Uy G.. ~ ^^^ .~M C0~ J .^~ L-' L -. L~~ Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z ~ ~ ... Z r ~ ~ ~ E-, ' O ti i ~ > > 7 > > > > J X cc~ G N X L U X ~ r C Z N .r, m' F' r X ~ } L V_: k ~ } _ h X 2 } h X ~ } C\I X ~ } L~ C= z' z~ z~ ti= w z~ z x F z~ F z~ z" ~ ~ ~, ~, ~ O a a o. _ ~ r Z w = ~ ~ ~ W [r7 v '~ ~ Z o z z z z z z z z z z N v - z z C i ~ ~,", F.. E. r.. v ~.., F. F ~. `- ~ ~ U ~ L o° o G o 0 0 ^o - ~ 0 o C N a c b r ~ a N .r w G N. ? L ~;, v ,. ,. ' ~ > W Z O Z, N O N O O ,~ O O v O G ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ Q ~ V Z ~ .~ Q N ~~ ` rJ ` ~ Z N ~ N ! V ~ P. z V: G ~ ~ VJ N ~ m W ~ L `r V: ~~ (/J M W b (~}] ^ [!) O Vi N 1 [~ w n ~ V] V; O ~ ~ ~ ~ !/J O ~ CL1-1 [~ ` N ~ .`~- FW,,. !x] ~ C:: z Z~ ~- W H O Z ~ ~ W Q~ ~ z ' cv !s: W W G N ~ 2 L cl ~ ,L`] _ F U ?: O z !-- ~ ::l ~~ z C'.] =1 Z~? F W s z z W W G z z i--i ~ ti Ly ~ n W N G N 'x C ~ ~ ~ C ti C ~` O Y. oc z w o o -- O N eo w ^ N 5 ~ v L O ^ ~ ~ . ,,, C . z ~ a o ~ o G rv o c G rv ~ _ ~ n _ N ~ ~ ~c o o > ~ a z z c ~ } ~ } } } } } } } } ~;,;;~~' ~ z ¢ 4 a < ¢ a ¢ ¢ < ' c z~ z z z z z z z z z z ~ - Z: ~ M _ m n ~ m ~ ~" °i a " ~ m ~^ o -- m rn " N N o Z~ y ~; ~ ~ N r a L Z v: - ~ ~_ {-, C K K fP, N 69 CA (9 GA 69 69 Z ~ n N ~ N rn a a a a m r - -' c N Z v Z J L K 69 K K f K fP, K 69 bs .~ ~^ _' w vi .: ~` ^" > :+1 O `~ o d. m ~ 4~ oC L M .~ Q. N ^ ~ O L > Q - m 3 W m W m (=- W c }, W rn fn w W w m> w m w oo z W x W ,': G (] C o', _ ~ w ~ d y cG d z ° 2 ~' > a d W a' ' rn O ,N. o. ~ Z rn Cc.' o, >~ ri' a N ~ Z c ~ j U ~ ~ ~ a v, w a ~ rn P O rn ~ ~ 1 a ~ z rn ~ 0 . ~ , ~ m w a N W a c9 ~ 65 85 J rh O ^K f ~~ z~^ ~z ~~ V ~~v } ~~ ~ N ;~~~ .r c ~ ~ ~~ f~ ~~, .r W '"~ ~ Y.+..I H N ~ r , ^~ ice( ~ w z`} z z z z z z z z z z 4 ~ O ._ H ~ ~. c.- _. =, V .. Z X v ^ O ~ C ~ O ~ O i O J C O > > ~ > > > > > > > > x x x a x x x r, x x _ C O = ¢ ~ i 4 e i e ~ ~ ¢ e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ -" _ .-. n. .., c. G o. n. .. Z _ Z = r r r r r r :- r r ~- _;~c. ~ c ~ ~ ~ z z z z z z z z z z z ~o^ .. z Z ~ V ~~ ~, ~ F i ~- ~ c._ to ~-. c~ v in F ~ H ~ F ~ F v O n ~ C U ~% L _ v.7 ^, ry Oh OT ~. c N TO .~-~ b O O ... ~ m ~ >- M O N ° y O O ~ m O Z .~ cn o r ~ O^ v ~ rn G r3r M rn r c. ~ e O N O^ N v: .c C~ O O ~ rn ~ ~ C C O O H rn ~ z r o o: O ~ v ^ C .-. ~ y O^ ~ ~ -. o L ,^, `~ i , .c W ~ L C C :'-1 " W ~. C~ Ll m '•. a~ ~ ,- ~^ - C .o txl f - t ! - ~ ~ W tr] -' W o ,L'1 ~ W Lc: ry7 ~ L_t W in W ~ F [ , _ p] ^ ~ Zr Z F ~_ O Z O W o tr] z 0 :. tr] ° W o z N L•` o lL Z N C F- fx7 . W Z Z f- ~ Z G Z ' / r rn ~.d z~ O~ r ~- ~..~ Z N. O G~ o O~ z _ ~ ^ rv ^ C ~ ~ ~ ~ ^ i ^ G C ~ C O 4 ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ G ~ G ~, O ~ L~ ,~ G .~ , G -" O Y. x x m m oo x o m y ~ ~~~ ~;- .: ~ r N_ ,, Z ~ Vi T N N m O ~ c O ° - ° O o T ^ c _ ~ O c o ~ ~ o ~: i Z Z a %~ r r y. r r r r r r r ~~,~~ z r z < < ¢ ¢ ' 4 ' ¢ ¢ z a z a ' z N z G z z z z z z z rn z ~ Vt O O~ r+1 = M ~ !~ ~ V N N 1~ ~ ? ~ N •-~ O [~ CO N [~ h ~ - rn N t~ V~ M b ~ J Z ~ y w y rp, vs e; » 4r v, 45 fA Z h C F N r1 P O T - n o b . m N ~ M, C ~ N OO ^J ~ O C - M, N OC N t~ ~~ ~ t~ W N ~ h .. . M I ~D h r P z ~, C z 0 ~..~ e9 Ff. 69 (f 64 69 5R 49 V3 69 b9 H ~ LG G~ C x ~ ~ J a W ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ F, a ~- _ ;~ Z ,~ V F > N ~ ~ > ^! < .n ~ ~ ~ cn n ~ ~ D m ~ ~' a .o .n L" ~ .~ W `4N o ~ ~' ° ° n O ^ U ~~ .. T+ _ ~ .^, .o ' ^ !n!om-~ ~c O C^ ^ `~' ~o ^- ~ ~o O~ .~ ~ G _ ~L, ~ O W W .n o: O V ~ O C V N ~ Q O V N C V O •~ ~ 7: W C J o W !~ ~ ~ W o r r ~ W ~ r G W C -~ F o~ `s~, W o F eo N E.. o F., cG Lcl o ~% oo ~ W c H z ' oo ~ W o H C ~ ~ o~ > ~ o~ > ~ d j cG ~ j cC c, n. ~'' ~ ~ G ~ w o, z a ~ a ~ ? cG J L .,, q rn rn rn C s~ ~ rn rn Q rn Ci rn rn ~ J rn rn "~ ~ O rn rn ~ ~ rn a rn ~ u. ,:. Z _ _1 • L C r~ ~ ~ ~?-' 1r t/1 ~ ~ ~z ~~~ ~j~ •~~ ^1 ~ ~ /"~ ~.s r. "~ ^~^ i.~ z ,~ _, z ; ^1 / 1 rr~^^ ~y Vl ~'" ~ y ., z ~ Z ~ } Z `~ n n O ;-. c _ U p ~ > - ~ ~ =z s; ~~' "' ~Y G ~ C Z ~ O [~ ¢ `O 3 ~ Y z .. ~ x ~ " z r a ., v`~ > .~ z -z F ::7 z =~ 0 c U ~ c:: E U ^ c a r .-. _ ~' J G _ h - 4 _ v i L ? ` J _ ~ r C V ~. ~*' i `~ ^v C7 Lr c ~. U ~ Z c-v %` z x r ~ ~ :, ~ C '' C <_ ~ z ~ z 5 G :D Z v~ ~ G U Z 2 `ti G 69 Z G CC L ~~~ c~ y (.) 69 a ~ G ~ G ~ z ~ ~ i-. ~° ~. :> G ~' ~ ~ p c - .r ~ n ~ C U~. z c z F- ~ c.~m O ~~ °' o eG ~ G ~ C G ~ ~ 45 ~ L9 87 R O A N O K E V A L L E Y P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VA 24018 540-776-7159 540-772-2108(FAx) Ibelcher@www. co.roa noke.va.us www.greenways.org To: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors From: Pete Haislip Liz Belcher Re: Roanoke River Greenway Funding Request: Allocation of $208,000 for construction of Roanoke River Greenway During greenway planning in the Roanoke Valley, citizens have always ranked the Roanoke River Greenway as the number one priority. In 1998 the Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission sponsored preliminary design of the greenway from Green Hill Park through the City of Salem. Total cost for the seven miles of trail was projected to be $2.34 million. In January 2000 the City of Salem and Roanoke County applied for TEA-21 Enhancement funds for construction. The total funds requested were $1.6 million, with $832,660 in the first phase from Green Hill Park to Mill Lane. The match to the TEA-21 funds was to include, over three years: $150,000 from Salem, $75,000 from Roanoke County, contract administration and inspection from Salem, and right-of--way donations. Neither locality has budgeted this match. TEA-21 funds awarded to the project in June 2000 were $300,000, or approximately one-third of the funding requested. Staff from the County and Salem recommend that the $300,000 be used in the following way: 1) $125,000: Engineering of the entire 7-mile section from Green Hill Park through Salem 2) $175,000: Construction of the greenway in Green Hill Park and Diuguids Lane bridge to Salem (estimated at $383,000). In addition staff recommend that: 1) Roanoke County and Salem reapply for additional TEA-21 Enhancement funding in 2001 which could be used for construction in Salem; and 2) Roanoke County allocate $208,000 to complete construction of the greenway and bridge in Green Hill Park. This is higher than the projected County cost because only partial funding was received from TEA-21. Summary: Roanoke River Greenway in Roanoke County, Green Hill Park: • $175,000 -TEA-21 funds available, out of $300,000 awarded jointly to Salem • $208,000 -Request for County funds • $383,000 -Total projected cost: one mile of trail, one parking lot, one bridge ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~ ' ~ ~. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THOEBOARD OOFUNTY ADMIN STORATOIONOCENTER TY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE R MEETING DATE: November 14, 2000 AGENDA ITEM: Work Session on Financial Information COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This time has been set aside for a review of the following financial information: A. Results of operations for the County for the year ended June 30, 2000 (Diane H att As a result of the year end operations, $2,639,382 will be added to the General Fund Unappropriated Balance and $227,701 will be added to the Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance. The source of these funds will be reviewed at this work session. B. List of~otential needs (Ebner Hodge) There are several large amount that the board is aware of that could be appropriated from the year end balance. These will be reviewed with the Board at this time. C. Rollover requests from County departments (Brent Robertson) Based upon County policy, the departments are allowed to rollover 60% of their departmental savings from the prior year to purchase capital or non-recurring items. These rollovers total $233,235 and will be reviewed with the Board at this time. D. Review of first ,quarter revenues for 2000-2001 (Brent Robertson) The review of the first quarter revenues indicates that we can expect revenues in excess of budget for 2000-01 of $2,820,284. The source of these revenues will be reviewed with the Board. SUBMITTED BY: y~.~ CC~~ ~ ~-NUS.-d Diane D. Hyatt Chief Financial Officer APPROVED: ~"~''~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator M:\FINANCE\COMMON\Board-Reports\2000\l 1-14-0Od.wpd ~~~ - K~ Approved () Motion by Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To O No Yes Abs Church Johnson McNamara Minnix Nickens M:\FINANCE\COMMON\Board-Reports\2000\ I 1-14-00 d.wpd ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER '~ ~""~" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 14, 2000 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Appropriation as a Result of Operations for the Year Ended June 30, 2000 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: The results of the YE financial operations are very favorable and I am most pleased Several things are noteworthy. First, I wish more of the increase had come from commercial and industrial Real Estate taxes which would reflect improvements in our economic development efforts. R/E taxes were actually slightly UNDER our expectations. Perhaps this is indicative of lessening dependency on R/E taxes and a trend to other sources such as personal property, sales taxes, meals taxes, and fees. The greatest increase came from Personal Property taxes ($1, 085, 997). This indicates that we have a large dependence on the currently good economy that is encouraging consumer spending. It should be noted that expenditure savings are getting smaller each year as we tighten the budgets on the departments. We really provide great services, with great customer service, with less money than most other localities in the State. This is reflected in the 'yellow book" that we receive each year from the Auditor of Public Accounts. It is also meaningful to me that our budget this year is very good and the staff and I appreciate your support in this. We funded the operating costs of the new high school, bought new firetrucks, new trash trucks, and we gave good increases to our employees. It has been a very good year. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: KPMG has completed their audit of the financial operations of the County of Roanoke and the County of Roanoke Schools for the year ended June 30, 2000. The County received a favorable opinion. The printed Comprehensive Annual Financial Report will be distributed to the Board of Supervisors as soon as it is received from the printers in a few weeks. The Audit Committee will meet on November 17, 2000 to review the results of the year's operations and the management letter comments from the auditors. The County operations for the year ended June 30, 2000 resulted in expenditure savings of $457,936 as shown on Attachment A. Based upon the policy for the rollover of year end savings the departments were able to request up to 60% of the savings within their own department for special purchases and programs as approved by the County Administrator. These approved departmental rollovers total $233,235, which are outlined in Attachment C. This leaves a net M:\FINANCEICOMMON\Board-Reports\2000\l l -14-0Ob.wpd '~,,~ expenditure savings of $224,701. Based upon the rollover policy this amount will be transferred to the capital unappropriated balance. The general fund revenues were $3,362,649 over budget, as shown on Attachment A. Amore detailed analysis of general fund revenues is outlined in Attachment B. From this amount, the Board approved a rollover of $723,267 as part of the original 2000-2001 budget appropriation. This rollover was for the following items: Building upgrades for fire and rescue Financial system upgrade GASB 34 -Restructure Financial Reporting VA Western Comm College -site preparation Treasurer -Investment Tracking Software Total $500,000 100,000 50,000 32,267 41.000 723 267 This leaves a balance of $2,639,382 to be added to the general fund unappropriated balance. The general fund unappropriated balance at June 30, 2000 is $9,908,641. This is an increase of $2,099,688 or 26.89% from last year. As of June 30, 2000 the general fund unappropriated balance was 8.63 % of the general fund revenues. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: In accordance with County policy, staff recommends the following: 1. The County net surplus of $224,701 be appropriated to the capital unappropriated fund according to the rollover policy. 2. The net increase as a result of revenues of $2,639,382 be appropriated to the general fund unappropriated balance. SUBMITTED BY: Diane D. Hyatt Chief Financial Officer Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To () Motion by APPROVED: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator No Yes Abs Church Johnson McNamara Nickens M:FINANCE\COMMON~Board-Reports~2000\l i-14-0Ob.wpd l.~- :c~ ATTACHMENT A County of Roanoke General Operating Fund For the Year Ended June 30, 2000 Variance Budget Actual Amount Revenues 107,510,752 110,873,780 3,363,028 (2) 3.13% Expenditures and commitments (49,435,273) (49,050,913) 384,360 (1) -0.78% Beginning Balance 9,453,136 9,467,377 14,241 (2) 0.15% Transfers In 134,679 120,059 (14,620) (2) -10.86% Transfers Out (60,394,035) (60,320,459) 73,576 (1) -0.12% 7,269,259 11,089,844 3,820,585 Departmental rollover (233,235) Rollover approved for 2000-01 budget (723,267) Transfer to Capital Unappropriated Bal ance per rollove r policy (224,701) Addition to General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2,639,382 Preliminary General Fund Unappropriated Balance at June 30, 2000 7,269,259 Adjusted General Fund Unappropriated Balance at June 30, 2000 9,908,641 (1) =Expenditures savings total $457,936 (2) =Revenue surplus totals $3,362,649 M:\Finance\Commonlaudit2000\YEAREND.xIs 11/09/2000 ATTACHMENT B N ~ _ ~ d O _ ~ O ~ ~ O ~ ~ N p d p U ,O^ V V d C d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r ^ \ o \ \ \ \ o \ e \ \ \ \ c \ \ c \ o \ c C~ ~' CO O !~ N I~ O r O O O ~ M~ N O~ (~ M O M M G1 y~ M 00 ~ I~ 00 N M O t0 N O N ~'-' O (O f~ Ch N r 0 O `~= O 'd' O r r fA r M f? ~~ i1' r r~ M N r N O M d 0 ~ r r a ..- ~ ~ t 1 1~ O O r N to e- (~ O O M '7 O r M~ r 0 CO ~ O In '7 O N d' ~ t0 M I~ I~ (O r 00 O O l1') OD CO 'a ^ r O d' ~ N r N 0 r r In r O 00 ~ O r 't7 O M r N ~ 1n 00 (D ~- CO 00 ~ (O O N M to O CO 00 '~ I~ O N 3 V I~ t0 O O 00 1~ M CO v GO to N O v~ t1') r ..~ v V' ~ d~ ~ O N r' M ~- N ('7 r (O {~ ~ r N 0 r f~ O O r N~ r" O O M~~ r M~ 0 0 M 1~ O ~ ~ O N ~ ~ ~ M ti ~ O (O 00 f~ O d' CO o0 O G O~ ~t `7 N r N O OD r Ln r O O~ O CD to ~ O ~ Q ~ O W N CD (~ t0 00 O M A N oD O~ (fl O oD M O B Q> M O M N O~ Cfl M M 00 r Cp ~t O~ O (fl ~O O I~ 'a' ~ ~ ~ t0 00 N M O M Cfl O I~ ~ t!') N CO O M C~ O ~ 00 N N CO '[t' ~ r' N r r O ~ ~ ct N r 'C ,~,,, O r d O C1 3 ~ ~ -a ~ ~" amp y ~ Q O ~ ~ 3 Q m LPL cfl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O M O 0 0 0 00 O x 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O 00 O 00 O O f~ O x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O Cfl O f~ O O~ r CO O~ 0 0 0 0 O O~ O~~ (O O N~ r r- O (D tL') N O t0 O O (~ N M r N O N (D O f~ r 0 O ~~ In r N CO M O O CO ~f LA O~~ ti N (fl r V' N N O tt M s- ~ N O r O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 ~_ O O O O O~ O In 0 0 In O L() O~ In (D 0 0~ f~ M Ln r lA N O (fl O O Cfl N M r N 0 0 (O O I~ O O O 1~ In In r N CO M O O (O ~~ O Cfl In ti N~ M A N N Cfl '~Y' ch r ~- N O X (6 F- N U X C p N N ~" N N a ~ c0 N X (xp N C O U1 O N c ~ N (9 X C O V N~ p N ~. N C N J= X N O 1- O -~' I- ~ v .c ~ ~° F- c H y o a'i ~ 7 U E +0.. ~ Q N C J C L O~ x L U LL -gyp C0 O N 'a ~ W ~ O` f0 O ~ (`9 N ~ O ~_ a ~ V1 p ~ to ~ ~ > CO d (A U ~ LL ~ '4 ~ N (0 ` ~ N O O1 N ~ ~ ~ N L_ U~ N C~ U ~O+ ~~ N~ O O N U U N O p :~. ~ t6 O N O N N~ N .~ to L N N ~dO.J~mm~~2~UOali~U~~' c O O t0 M M O O M O r ti O_ O O O tL') O r 69 d G d d r~+ F- "` ~' GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA of General Amount Fund Revenues Unaudited Beginning Balance at July 1, 1999 $7,269,259 6.11° Oct 24, 2000 Funds for twenty additional paramedic firefighters (907,000) and planning for renovations to Vinton, Read Mountain, and Mason Cove stations Balance at November 14, 2000 $6,362,259 5.35% Changes below this line are for information and planning purposes only. Balance from above $6,362,259 Addition from 1999-2000 operations 2,639,382 $9,001,641 7.57% Note: On December 18, 1990, the Board of Supervisors adopted a goal statement to maintain the General Fund Unappropriated Balance at 6.25% of General Fund Revenues 2000 - 2001 General Fund Revenues $118,982,797 6.25% of General Fund Revenues $7,436,425 Respectfully Submitted, Diane D. Hyatt Chief Financial Officer Approved By, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator M:\Finance\Common\Board-Reports\MonthtyReports\GENOO.xIs 11/09/2000 ;~ N O O N LL r _ ~ N Z ~ ~ d ~ = O r 2 O a 0 N J 00 ~ ~ EA C .~ ~ ~ N O C .p .~ N O }. p ~ C ~ ~ otS U c0 ~ W N C N d ~ O N a ~ O ~ ~ > O ~ 0 0 .~ ~ p ~ U ~ O U w 00 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 ~ N N N ~ N C O U N C C O U 3 N '~ C l9 N t0 O t U t m 2 C 0 U i ~ N O g~ L U m C .~ C N v- N C O N ~L N ~ N U ~ 0 3 U N C ~ ,6 ~ O U C " C U .~ p `' N N Q ~ Y ~ O v-- ~ ~ }.c°'~ o N ~ N ~ X C O .~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ cn (~0 ~ ~U, > d t N ~j U :~ li N ++ .N ~ N C i N ~ ~ O F-- N N ~ O Y ~ a rn ~ a~ m o ~' X (Ud N w ~ .` 7 O N C w ~a ~U N Q N U .~ Y U m f0 N N a f6 O C 0 m Q U .Q d .~ W 0 ~ ~ co ~ ~ w _U Q .Q a oo_ o°o3Z, N N 0 ~ Q E N u1 N N C ~ O ~ ~ __ U ~ t4 2 ~ +-. C ~ ~ N ~ N ~ (~ U U m o E ,~ o 0 O N N ~,, ~ CD U p y U t. N N N O ~ U~Q L A M O J+ C N ~ U ~ N N ,c p Y ~ N ~ aNi Y ~ ~ ~ p ~m ~ c c v ~ O O ~ ~ ~ > ti L_ 0 0 O O _N r 'T^ VJ J X O O ~_ 3 7 v c a~ X N N rn 7 m U C lC C w C O o Y ~ °o ca C ~~- N ~ O. LL 'a' C..~ Sao ~ ~ 01 O ~ Os U ~ ~ 0 E E N o O a~ m ~ ~ U o m ~ o d ' N ~ ~ ca U ~ > U 3 o ~ ~ N O m a~ c •~ ~ c U ~ c N C ~ ~ O~ ,`~ J N ~ C l9 'O N ~. N _ C N O f~0 ~ N ~ N U N to O ° ~ ` ~ N c a V o ~ N ~ O c ~ O ~ ~- N m c m N ~ ~ O o N > ~ v .C ~ ` o ~ ~ n N O ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ U - ~ ' a ° ~ n ~ ~ o ~ co U E a a~ o ` ~ ~ cn v , ~ O N O~ O L ~ ~ O O O~ O p O O DO O O U m O~ Qj N I~ (O O O C 41 N r r d' N •~ ~ v .- v ~1~1 tC d m ~ O ~ ~ N ~ 07 1...rI,~ ~ 4~~ '~M ATTACHMENT C a ch a~ ~' co ~ °o o U ~ a N ~ o ~3 ~ ~ 0 a` U a> H a i Q o 3 ° ~ ~ ~ C v O Q ~ X U c d a~ U ~ i U c ~ C ~ w ~ w' o ~ N ~ d rn c ' o L ~ d C .~ H U ~ ~ ~ I~ M N ~ ~ v ~ ~i ~ri a r+ r d H (D C ~ ~ r Cfl O ,~ a m ~ m ~ 0 O ~ M (O CO d' CO ~t ~ N O N ch 1~ N f~ N N a0 CO N 00 to OD N ~ 00 O [i' N I~ O O M d' ti (D (fl O O f~ O M N w N ~- ti ~ ~ O ('7 O ~ ~' ~ M O O ~ v N O CO N M ~ v ~ O ~ ++ v d C. y:. Z ~ 0 N ... +-' C ~ ~ N ~ m ~' o c E a~i c o ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ o cn ~ ~ o :.~ v, m a O ~ ~ ~ Q .~ N =. '~ o ~ 0 U t0 ~ u ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 U G> D •C ~ C O N O N O _ U ~ ~ O . ~ ~ ~, O ~ Q p . N ~ •p • N ~ N D ~ Q c ~ Q ~ U O m ° ~ o ~ ~ ~ y- O U ~. ,~. c o ~ Q ~ o ,., m ~ 7 ~ 7 ~ p ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ U c ° 7 m U U U 2 W U U ~ H H U U C 0 0 0 n Q O N X N O O } 0 d m v C O O ' Y ++ O lC _ ~~ N ~ Q. L}L y- Q. ,~ ,~+ Q O _ ~ 07 O ~ ~ V O ~ ~ ~ d _O .N O ~ 'C a~ C ~ f0 U o a a~ ~ v 0 m rn~ "n ~ c M ~ ~ ~ M M = d v _ DO •= C ~ 0~O ~ l0 Ri d m ~ ~ r.+ d N ~ O ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ LL ~ d ~ CAD ti N N N ~ C7 0~0 M CD r .+ ~ ~ V Q. OO v ~ Z ~ G v rn ~+ ~ C C ~ U ~ Q i U o o b ~ ~ U N ~ ~ % ~ .. ats O ui ~ ~ U Q '~ O Q Q. >' N o ~ ° o E c ~ U O F' N fh UJ O ~ ... ~ ~ C fq N O .L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ U U ~ f0 o m D - ~ oZS O D d ~ U ~ a ~ .~ ~ ~ c_~u n. U ~ n ~ ~~ ao N N O N p N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q) 00 ~ N CEO ODD ~ ~ 00 I~ N ~ N ~ ~ ~' N r ti ~ .ter ATTACHMENT C a v 0 0 0 N W O v L ~ U ~ ~ a E c N ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ U (0 ~ ~ 'D N ~ N f6 ~ C ~ t .~ Q ~ C Q _ U ~, N ~ ~ ~ m o c"o o ~ ~ _ U _ ~ -° a m~ a~ a m N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N m o a c~i N N r a? ~ ~ ~- t(y r ... r ~ ~ ~ ~ O M ~ N N ~ O p ~ ~ o j . ~ c m ~ ~ U ~j f 1 C c ~ a ii r C7 (fl OD sT I~ I~ O ~ ~ N ~ N 0 0 a? ~ CO o N N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o . -- d a Q ~ m 7 N X N N O ~ C O ~ N .... m ~ W ~ W ~ ~ v m ~ N ~ ~ C ~ ~ O ~ ~ l0 ~ U m ~ c V ~ o v c a i ~ rn . °~ ~ i a ~ ~ .~ y O ~ C C D C U V ~ U -= ~ a a O ~ Y ~ O _ 'C N Q. IJ.. .,.. Q, .~ Sao _ ~ CA O ~ Os C.1 ~ ~ ATTACHMENT C c °- 0 U ~f' N o c0 ~ N °o N N +0.. ~ : . O Z O ` C , . C L E N U U ~ ~ 0 w ~ U ~ ~ 3 ~ o a' m a O Q ` ~ 0 0) ~ ~ (n ~ N N O ~ J ~ . '~ 0 N ~ C O O- ~ d ~ ` O ~ y N C B _ O C O O~ ~ O N Q) N O ~ G ~ 'p N Y~ .dC N N ~"' ~ ~ d U '~ ~ f0 U 0 0 N~ C '` ~ 0) ' ' N 3 O c O U ~ d ~ . c ~ C c o ~' O O 3 ~ o o ~ ~ ` > ~' C~ U C ~ U U a' 0) ~ ~ ~ ~ C 4- ~ O U ~ 'D ~ -~ f0 0) L ~ 0] U O ' ~ fd ~ ~- c°~~ O N 3 ~ pQ ~ ~ E =O W UU 0- ~ ~ N nU ~ °' ~ ~~ a v U ~ O C U a i ~ °' f0 ~ m o aci 0) C _ Z > ~ i a ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ c v ~ t O~ O~ O O 0 0 ~ O O O 1~ 00 N O ~ O 0 0 ~ O C M `~ ti U_ ~ O ~ r Ln r fl- ~~ _ N ti ~ ~ 0 r EA H3 EA EA Ef? EA ~ Ef3 d3 Ll. E,9 EA ~ f~ O r ~ Cfl ~ 0 CO N ~ t1~ ti N r ~ cn rn C 0) lM ~ ~ ~ ~ (O 0 0 e - to a V '= 00 ~ O N N 00 ~ ~Y' O CA N ~ d' C: 'm ~ r ~ N ea d m ~' ti4 r ~~ r r O h ~ ~ 00 ~ c^ N r M O N r M N O, y p~ ~ N ~- ~ d' aD ~ 0 N N r M N M M O O ~ ~ ~ LL O) ~ ~ M r- N ~ ~ ~- N r ('O CA (O 0 ~ ~ M M ~ ~ N M O 3 ~ (fl I~ N 0 ~ CO N O N d' tf r ~ ~ M N O ~ ~ Z d ~ ~ ~ U C _ > 0 d _ ~ ~ = E c C ~ °' E a o = ~ o ~ '~ > o .`.. N N W C. O U C U N ~ N _ R d ~ O ~ Z ~ Q ~ U ~ ~ _ ~ IJJ d ~ ~ ~° o a i ~ a ° ~ a. ~ m m C7 ~ L ~j c o ~ _ ~ ~ o o ~.+ ~ C N ~ U ~ Q O ~ O cxC O 0 0 0 a a O m N X N _O O 0 a~ m v 3 ~c G d ~ ~ 0 = _ ~ r ~ ~ 0 O = N _ ~ ~ ~ L 0 U p (7 L d C d d ~ dew a ~ ~ n n ° ° ~ e ~ \ E ~ ~ v o 0 0 °r i a o. o r i. rn 0 0 ~O ~ N ~ a o (~ ~} ~ ~ r sT M ~ CM .- O C ~ ~ ~ O ~ N ~ O M M ~ M a 0O LL i ~ tL > 0 0 0 0 0 co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~c n o rn O O O O O f0 O O O O O O O O O O O O M O O O ~ O O O O O n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ O ~ M ao M d M O M M O M O O M ~ O ~ n O O O O ~ O> ~ N C N ~ f0 ~ n N O (O oo O n fD p O O M O 00 (D CO n O (p OD ~ e}' N M t0 QI n f0 ~Y M t0 t0 aD M f0 u9 M tD 0) N O M N CO ~ E9 M 69 N M• V- fA fA fA E9 ~ N O N fA fF) ~ fA fA f9 E9 fA VT Q ER b9 fR N O O O O O f0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O f0 O O O O O O O O O O ~ f0 O ~ C O O O O O n O O O O O M O O ~ O o ~ M N 7 d O O M ~A O OD O ~ O ~ N (v O O (O f0 ~ ~ ~O O m N ~ O M N ~ O n N N OO N N ~ N N ~ r ~ N ~ •- ` -' ` -' ` .' a 0 ~ ..~ O ~ ~ O 'O O Q N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O f0 a0 ~ M O ~ O O O ~ M ~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O F CI O O '0 0 0 0 0 ~n o 0 0 0 ~n ~n in ~ m 0 o n ao u~ o n a; o o v n o o co o n n m u~ n N n rn ao it) D. O n N _ O M f0 (O fQ M l0 O n M O ~ O M O O N N f0 a M r .- N ~ n N ~ Q ~ M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 e 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 }' to O n g (O ~ O aO M (O n ~ ~ n O M O ~ O n n ~A e G ~ c+i fV ~ fD (O N O c+i c+i aD ~ et 1~ ~ t0 ~ N ~C) O M ~ <D ~ ' r r .- .- r r r O m r ~ LL 01 } O O N 00 O O N O n O O N ao 0o M ~ n n Q) O O O n f0 ~ M O ~ ~ O Of CO 00 O to M Of n f0 N ~ O fD f0 aO cD N O n _ _ N ~ aD M ao N (O <t O) M N Q ~ O to r fD fD N a0 M CO M Oi W ~ f0 M 00 N ~ n Oi p 0 } p M O n LL7 ~ et O O O (O n f0 of ~ ~ a a0 O ~ N ~ M O a0 M O M N M to N >. p v N n , IL V fA n n O O O O ~ O N N to ~ ~ O M O n M n N f0 aD M n N O n M st O O fD N ~ O ~ ~ N _ N O O CO _ O O OD ~ O O O O M N ~ ~ 7 O O M O (D N ONO ~Op ~O ~ t0 O 00 M (O M O O n N ~ M ~ O eO 0 fD t0 O O O M O 0 ~ 00 O M n 00 n I a+ p N N f0 ~ ~ ~ N N ~ f .- f CO N O Q LL t? 69 N fH n 00 n M ~ ~ O n 00 (D O O CO aD 00 ~ O ao O N ~ ~ ~ ~O N n 00 O N ~ ~ ~ N ~ N N O O ~ O o CO Q1 i O i M r ~ o d' i ~ M ~ M i O f f0 o O ~ O t0 ~ n f a0 ~ f0 m e} o ~ M o N~ a to ~ r M N u n f0 O Sr O ~ 01 u ~ o O c N r O n o (O O M a v O c 7 CO V p M (O M_ p N O ~ O ~ <D M N CO e-- O e- O (~j O e- LO O n M f0 ao (p u'~ (y O Q } lL V 69 N 69 X f0 ~--~ X ~ ~ ~p ~ N N ~ N y d N F~ ~ m x cy o °~' m a `y~ a~i X ~ ~ X N CN N J c X ~ X 4'S N f0 Z ~ fq L ~ ~ ~~ 7 U L ~ ~ H C f' ~ p N ~ j (~ f0 d U C O LL p y 0f ~ d n' N C J C L ~ O X L ~ lL O w N ~ 3 3 ~ ~ (p O N N N ~ O W a O C ~ N t0 ~ C d W c d ~ U N LL ~ ~pp ~ ~ f0 '~ H l0 "' N pdp O l` > O L ~ ~C Y ~ U O l0 L ~ O O Qf ~ U E -p ~ N N p O f0 O N O d N N C H L N O y >~ a~ ~~ m m~~ x~ U 0 a~~ U~~ U LL ~ m ~ ,F *^,~.., ~. ~. "' ~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2000 RESOLUTION 111400-4 CERTIFYING THE CLOSED MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened a closed meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such closed meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the closed meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the closed meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor McNamara to adopt the Certification Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~y"Y~.oc~.-cfi- ~ . ~ Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Closed Meeting File S Y R- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2000 RESOLUTION 111400-5 OF CONGRATULATIONS TO ALAN MAY FOR BEING NAMED TO ALL STATE GOLF TEAM WHEREAS, team sports are an important part of the curriculum at schools in Roanoke County, teaching cooperation, sportsmanship and athletic skill; and WHEREAS, Alan May, a student at Glenvar High School, had an outstanding season on the golf team under the leadership of coach Bo Hagen; and WHEREAS, Alan demonstrated his outstanding athletic ability and good sportsmanship throughout the season; and WHEREAS, Alan was named to the All District Golf Team as a freshman, sophomore and junior; named to the All Regional Golf Team as a sophomore and junior; and was named to the All State Golf Team this year as a junior, the only Roanoke County student to achieve this recognition; and WHEREAS, Alan won the 1999 Junior Championship of the Roanoke Valley Golf Association and on November 2, 2000 was honored by being named to their First Hall of Fame; and WHEREAS, Alan is leader in other school activities including membership in the Fellowship of Christian Athletes, a Key Club Officer and President-elect of the National Honor Society. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia does hereby extend its sincere congratulations to ALAN MAY for being named to the All State Golf Team; and 1 R r BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors extends its bestwishes to Alan May in all of his future endeavors. On motion of Supervisor Church to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: m~~~- ,~. Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: Resolutions of Congratulations File Dr. Linda Weber, School Superintendent 2 h a.T..+.. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2000 RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS TO ALAN MAY FOR BEING NAMED TO ALL STATE GOLF TEAM WHEREAS, team sports are an important part of the curriculum at schools in Roanoke County, teaching cooperation, sportsmanship and athletic skill; and WHEREAS, Alan May, a student at Glenvar High School, had an outstanding season on the golf team under the leadership of coach Bo Hagen; and WHEREAS, Alan demonstrated his outstanding athletic ability and good sportsmanship throughout the season; and WHEREAS, Alan was named to the All District Golf Team as a freshman, sophomore and junior; named to the All Regional Golf Team as a sophomore and junior; and was named to the All State Golf Team this year as a junior, the only Roanoke County student to achieve this recognition; and WHEREAS, Alan won the 1999 Junior Championship of the Roanoke Valley Golf Association and on November 2, 2000 was honored by being named to their First Hall of Fame; and WHEREAS, Alan is leader in other school activities including membership in the Fellowship of Christian Athletes, a Key Club Officer and President-elect of the National Honor Society. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia does hereby extend its sincere congratulations to ALAN MAY for being named to the All State Golf Team; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, thatthe Board of Supervisors extends its bestwishes .. / ) ~ / to Alan May in all of his future endeavors. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2000 RESOLUTION 111400-6 OFCONGRATULATIONS TO STAFF AND ADVISORS OF WILLIAM BYRD HIGH SCHOOL SKETCHES FOR BEING NAMED MOST OUTSTANDING HIGH SCHOOL LITERARY-ART MAGAZINE FOR 2000 WHEREAS, Sketches, the art and literary magazine of William Byrd High School contains art work, poetry, short stories, essays, songs and plays written by students in grades nine through twelve, and is produced by student art and literary editors and faculty advisors; and WHEREAS, Sketches was rated first place in 1995, 1998, 1999 and 2000 by the American Scholastic Press Association; received a "First Place with Merit" for 2000; and previously earned five first place and two second place awards by the Virginia High School League; and WHEREAS, Sketches, Volume 28, was rated first place of the first place winners for 2000 by the American Scholastic Press Association and was named "Most Outstanding High School Literary-Art Magazine for 2000"; and WHEREAS, Sketches, Volume 28, was judged against 2,000 other schools and received perfect marks for diversity in art, writing and presentation; and WHEREAS, the staff for Sketches 2000 included Sara Ahalt; Adam Albertson; Ashley Altizer; Becky Armstrong; Amy Atkins; Stephanie Bryant; Laura Canner; Leah Carlton; Chris Denney; Katie Ellis; Kevin George; Erin Gordon; Amanda Grey; Meghan Guilliams; Anthony Hale; Ashley Hartman; Aaron Layman; Brad McConnell; Rebecca Medlin; Becca Moore; Melanie Moses; Jake Nute; Eric Roemer; Alisha Shelton; Tucker Stapleton; Jessi Wood; Anna Woodier Sarah Worley; and co-advisors Carol Conway and 1 Rebekah Woodie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, on behalf of its members and its citizens, does hereby extend congratulations to the staff and advisors at William Byrd High School for SKETCHES, VOLUME 28 being named the Most Outstanding High School Literary-Art Magazine for 2000; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors extends its bestwishes to each member of the staff and advisors for success with their future endeavors. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: _ ~ • C~Z~.~e..~t_.. Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: Resolutions of Congratulations File Dr. Linda Weber, School Superintendent 2 r AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2000 RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS TO STAFF AND ADVISORS OF WILLIAM BYRD HIGH SCHOOL SKETCHES FOR BEING NAMED MOST OUTSTANDING HIGH SCHOOL LITERARY-ART MAGAZINE FOR 2000 WHEREAS, Sketches, the art and literary magazine of William Byrd High School contains art work, poetry, short stories, essays, songs and plays written by students in grades nine through twelve, and is produced by student art and literary editors and faculty advisors; and WHEREAS, Sketches was rated first place in 1995, 1998, 1999 and 2000 by the American Scholastic Press Association; received a "First Place with Merit" for 2000; and previously earned five first place and two second place awards by the Virginia High School League; and WHEREAS, Sketches, Volume 28, was rated first place of the first place winners for 2000 by the American Scholastic Press Association and was named "Most Outstanding High School Literary-Art Magazine for 2000"; and WHEREAS, Sketches, Volume 28, was judged against 2,000 other schools and received perfect marks for diversity in art, writing and presentation; and WHEREAS, the staff for Sketches 2000 included Sara Ahalt; Adam Albertson; Ashley Altizer; Becky Armstrong; Amy Atkins; Stephanie Bryant; Laura Canner; Leah Carlton; Chris Denney; Katie Ellis; Kevin George; Erin Gordon; Amanda Grey; Meghan Guilliams; Anthony Hale; Ashley Hartman; Aaron Layman; Brad McConnell; Rebecca Medlin; Becca Moore; Melanie Moses; Jake Nute; Eric Roemer; Alisha Shelton; Tucker Stapleton; Jessi Wood; Anna Woodier Sarah Worley; and co-advisors Carol Conway and 1 f~l~ Rebekah Woodie. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, on behalf of its members and its citizens, does hereby extend congratulations to the staff and advisors at William Byrd High School for SKETCHES, VOLUME 28 being named the Most Outstanding High School Literary-Art Magazine for 2000; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors extends its best wishes to each member of the staff and advisors for success with their future endeavors. 2 .~ A-111400-13 ACTION NO. ~' / ITEM NUMBER'"' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 14, 2000 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Appropriation as a Result of Operations for the Year Ended June 30, 2000 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: The results of the YE financial operations are very favorable and 1 am most pleased. Several things are noteworthy. First, I wish more of the increase had come from commercial and industrial Real Estate taxes which would reflect improvements in our economic development efforts. R/E taxes were actually slightly UNDER our expectations. Perhaps this is indicative of lessening dependency on R/E taxes and a trend to other sources such as personal property, sales taxes, meals taxes, and fees. The greatest increase came from Personal Property taxes ($1, 085, 997). This indicates that we have a large dependence on the currently good economy that is encouraging consumer spending. It should be noted that expenditure savings are getting smaller each year as we tighten the budgets on the departments. We really provide great services, with great customer service, with less money than most other localities in the State. This is reflected in the 'yellow book" that we receive each year from the Auditor of Public Accounts. It is also meaningful to me that our budget this year is very good and the staff and 1 appreciate your support in this. We funded the operating costs of the new high school, bought new firetrucks, new trash trucks, and we gave good increases to our employees. It has been a very good year. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: KPMG has completed their audit of the financial operations of the County of Roanoke and the County of Roanoke Schools for the year ended June 30, 2000. The County received a favorable opinion. The printed Comprehensive Annual Financial Report will be distributed to the Board of Supervisors as soon as it is received from the printers in a few weeks. The Audit Committee will meet on November 17, 2000 to review the results of the year's operations and the management letter comments from the auditors. The County operations for the year ended June 30, 2000 resulted in expenditure savings of $457,936 as shown on Attachment A. Based upon the policy for the rollover of year end savings the departments were able to request up to 60% of the savings within their own department for special purchases and programs as approved by the County Administrator. These approved departmental rollovers total $233,235, which are outlined in Attachment C. This leaves a net M:\FINANCE\COMMON\Board-Reports\2000\l l -14-0Ob.wpd expenditure savings of $224,701. Based upon the rollover policy this amount will be transferred to the capital unappropriated balance. The general fund revenues were $3,362,649 over budget, as shown on Attachment A. Amore detailed analysis of general fund revenues is outlined in Attachment B. From this amount, the Board approved a rollover of $723,267 as part of the origina12000-2001 budget appropriation. This rollover was for the following items: Building upgrades for fire and rescue Financial system upgrade GASB 34 -Restructure Financial Reporting VA Western Comm College -site preparation Treasurer -Investment Tracking Softwaze Total $500,000 100,000 50,000 32,267 41,000 723 267 This leaves a balance of $2,639,382 to be added to the general fund unappropriated balance. The general fund unappropriated balance at June 30, 2000 is $9,908,641. This is an increase of $2,099,688 or 26.89% from last year. As of June 30, 2000 the general fund unappropriated balance was 8.63 % of the general fund revenues. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: In accordance with County policy, staff recommends the following: 1. The County net surplus of $224,701 be appropriated to the capital unappropriated fund according to the rollover policy. 2. The net increase as a result of revenues of $2,639,382 be appropriated to the general fund unappropriated balance. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: Q ~ ~ ~~ Diane D. Hyatt Elmer C. Hodge Chief Financial Officer County Administrator VOTE ACTION No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by: Joseph McNamara to approve Church - x Denied () appropriation Johnson - x Received () McNamara- x Referred () Minnix _ x To () Nickens ._ x cc: File Diane D. Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer Brent Robertson, Director, Budget M:\FINANCE\COMMON\Board-Reports\2000\l l -14-0Ob.wpd ATTACHMENT A County of Roanoke General Operating Fund For the Year Ended June 30, 2000 Variance Budget Actual Amount Revenues 107,510,752 110,873,780 3,363,028 (2) 3.13% Expenditures and commitments (49,435,273) (49,050,913) 384,360 (1) -0.78% Beginning Balance 9,453,136 9,467,377 14,241 (2) 0.15% Transfers In 134,679 120,059 (14,620) (2) -10.86% Transfers Out (60,394,035) (60,320,459) 73,576 (1) -0.12% 7, 269, 259 11, 089, 844 3, 820, 585 Departmental rollover (233,235) Rollover approved for 2000-01 budget (723,267) Transfer to Capital Unappropriated Bal ance per rollover policy (224,701) Addition to General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2,639,382 Preliminary General Fund Unappropriated Balance at June 30, 2000 7,269,259 Adjusted General Fund Unappropriated Balance at June 30, 2000 9,908,641 (1) =Expenditures savings total $457,936 (2) =Revenue surplus totals $3,362,649 .~ ..°"l M:\Finance\Common\audit2000\YEAREND.xIs 11/09/2000 ATTACHMENT B "` l0 7 N d Y ~ O = O ~ ~ O ~ y O ~ ~ N O ~ ~ d ~ C ~ O d V ~ O Q C d O .~ o 0 0 0 o a o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C ` ~ (D O I~ N I~ ~ ~ O GO O ~ M ~ N CO ~ (O M 00 M d d b M M O~ M N M O C~ N O N E QO CO f~ M N ~ O V~ O~ O ~ ~~ ~ M M ~~~~ r f~ M O r r lf) a Q? ~ r r ~ ~ r r M N ' N ~ I~ O O ~- N~ ~ CO O O M~ O ~ M O ~- O M ,O ~ O O ~ O N ~ ~! (O M i~ f~ CO ~ 00 O O to 00 00 .-. ~ O~~ N ~ N O ~ ~ O ~- O a0 ~A O ~~ O M ,+~~+ ~ to ~ 00 (D ~ (fl 00 to Cfl O N M ~ (~ CO 00 ~' v ~ N ~ V ~ M O O O ti M (O M 00 E N O I~ ~t ~ ~ s- ~ ~ Q~ .-- O N E M ~ N" M .- `-' CO ~ ~ 0 v ~ N .... O ~ O ~ ~ O ~ t~0 ~ ~` LL v ~ d 4 'O 3 ~ Q m LL d d 4 O ~ ~ Q m LPL r f~ O O ~ N~ ~- X 0 0 M 'Cf ~ ~ M~ O O M I~ O ~ d' O N ~t `d' M M 1~ ~ co CO aO f~ O ~ ao aO O O~~ N ~ N O M r to ~ O M~ O CD tL') d: ~ O ~ N (fl (O CO CO O M t[1 N 00 O ~ (O O 00 M ~ ~- O M N O ~' (fl M M 00 ~-- (fl V O ~ O CO QO O f~ ~ O (D QO N M O M (O O I~ t[) ~ N f0 (O O M (O 00 00 N N CO ~' ~• r' N ~ ~ O ~ N ~ 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O oO O a0 0 0~~ X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O (D O I~ to O~ ~ (fl O 'ct O to O O t[') O~ O~ to CO O N~ ~ ~ O (p t1y N O CO O O (O N M ~ N O N CO O f~ X 0 0 I~ to In r N CO M to O CO ~ ~ O ti O ~ N CO ~- 00 ~ N Cfl ~f• M ~ ~ N O ~ N ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~~ N O f0 O O (O N M~ N O~~ O~ 0 0 0 I~ ~ t1~ r N (O M t(y O (O ~ ~ O CO to I~ N O M oD ~•- N CO ~ M r- ~- N O ~ N M O M M N O (~ M M EA O M M O r M N O O O r 69 O O O (~ O r EJh d X 3 H d O ~ C ~ ~ O ~ N N N N Q. N +~.' ~ U ~ U ~ X N ~' H~ O O U N~ X N N ~ J w C > N N ~ N X p x ` (~ O C N J C X N ~ x~ ' fO N p ~ ~~~ ~ U L V c F' C c0 ~ N O N N O ~~ U N E .~ a p- N _ C J C ;~ O~ X= U L ~ O O ~ a E ~~ °~ o~ c a a~ ~ o L m a O ~ g ~ w e ~ o w cacn ` U ~~>-a~ ~' ~Jr m ~ o co ~ o O~ ~ m c ~ ~' ' c ~ U 4? to ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ o O O N ` ~ v rn ` N ~ N N~ O ~ +~ ~ N O N O p N~ p •c N y c u t •N O ~aO~ ~mm~~2 ~U0aIL ~ U~~ ~ E 3 N J X FW- g~ 2 0 0 m rn v m N O N O) 3 m ATTACHMENT C a ~. M ~ .- N ~ 'a N fd °o L U o N 7 Q ~ O y c o ~ N o a r O u v U a ~ a o m '~ ~' ~ _ o a` E d ~ `~ D N N ~ U O > V ~ ~ a N ~ ° ~ o > o ~ O c 3 . a~ c ai c ~ 3 o m ~ N ~ ~ ` ~ ~ O ~ -J NCR O ` c M c ,~ Y ~ ~ N N G }/ N N b1 ~ „' ~ Q U N v O ` N V `- ~ O c a X c °~ n _ U a o .~ ~ ~ i ~ a ~' (p m N c ~ a ~ ~' ~ ~ v ~ ~ o- ~ ~ '~ o N a m N c ~ ~ ~ i o ~ E a ~ `~ c~a ~? ~ ~ n rn o ~ O N C ~ O O O ~ O OD 00 0 Q 7 c L C ~ r ~ O ~ ~ ~ U ~ t O _ 0 0 _O U Y w O ~ (--' ~ EiR EA EA EA d H O ~ O C ~ N Q' } O W ~ ' S Q r ~ ti N N ti N CO 00 O ~t O N ~ r ~ ~ N f~ O N O) O r ~ O d N ~ ~ w O C N r r ~ N O 01 (O I~ C f~ I~ M N d a 0 L O V 'C ~ o v r 'fit N ~-- O `- v ~- N ~ _ ~ 01 p ld !C ~ !C ~ C m V C r ~ ~ ~ W O ~ O ~ M ~ N CNO r y N C O C O ~ O ~ ~ .- co ~7 r N O N N c•S 1~ O ~ ~ P d ~ L L 1 ~ G I~ N N O CO N 00 ~ 00 N ~ 00 O [t N I~ CO O M ~Y' f~ CO CO O O 1~ O M N N •- I~ ~' ~ O M O) ~ ~ I~ M O O o = 3 ~ N O c0 N M O v ~ Ln ~") o ++ d C) Q ~ .~ r ~ r a a Z ~ m y ~ N O m N X N O ~ O ~ `~ ~ N 3 } ~ N ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~+ 0 ~ ~ ~ o N ° `~° o w. y a~ o. o ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ U ~ ~ o °' U ; s Q ~ N ~ ~ ~ > ~ ~ ~ ~ v . 7 . ~ O C ~ ~ ~ cn ~ v ~' p ~ f A ~ ~ °- ~ 3 ~° ~ ~ L N ' ~ ~ ° Q c ' Q ~ v ~ c O o ~ ~ U ~ L' ,L, c o ~ Q ~ o Y ~. ~ C f0 O 7 O ~ O ~ O ~ O p U ~ O ~ O N L c ~ fd ~ ~ U `' O m U U U 2 W U U (n I- H U U C~ C O Y w O O!a O ~ Q. N ~ Q L}L ~ ~ ~ O Q O ,~,+ L O ~ d ~ > O V O ~ O ~ ~' ~ LL ATTACHMENT C a ,, »„ v 0 0 0 t... N Q O a 7 'O ~ ~ N ~ C 0 0 .~ m a` a ~ 'v ~ ao o c ~ cLo d D ~ (V v L O N w 0 O N p d1 ~ .... a-. ~ ~ ~ O L L~ N y +~ rtJ L N C O .` ~ N C N N L L ' ' ~ ~ U ~ ~ - ~ Q ' p. ~ m C N 'Q U f0 ~ ~ p Q C ~ '~ ~ ~ Q o1S ~ ~ N N ~ a~ U o V °~ m ~ ~ ~ a a~ O N a `' U v •~ ~ ~ m ,~ coo O p ~ N ~ L d LO ~ ~ Q. ~ ~ ~ ~~ ao a ~ cn m O~ O N O N ~ O O ~ ~t M O N O N p~ ~ EA EA EA EA EA EA ~ EA EA ~ ~ O ~ O O O r M CO 00 ~ In ~ CO N ~ (~ 1~ N ~ 00 N ~ CO N 1~ I~ ~ O N O ~ C G1 M Ov ('7 00 ~ ~ 00 f~ N Ln N CO I~ ~' ti ~ m ~~ ~ ~ ~ O v ~ N ~ ~ ~- ~ c~i d .~ ~ ~ d m 0' = r ~ M N ~ N r O y 1~ N N r O i ~ d ~ OO ~ ~ f~ r ~(y O ~ ~ a m ~ m ~ 0 d' (fl ~t f~ O N a0 N r N O N ~ ~ r cD M N CO 00 I~ ~ ~t tp I~ O I~ N O ch N M a0 M (p I~ ~ O ~ N E N O O si' CO o ~ ~~ f~ ~ cM V N N N M ~ ~ ~ ~ p d Q..~ Ov ~-- N r r 1~ f~ ~. Z ~ d Q ~ ~ ~ O m y X y N O _ C N a0, ~ _ ~ m ~ O _ O ~ ~ ~ O ~ W W U '~ 7 i r + ~ +_' O _ C ~ N N ~ ~ ~p C p y 'C N E ~ d U m N .~ ~ o D w ~ O V ~ Q ~ N ~ ~ >+ C a L C (~ C N ~ ~ O ~ v ~ U a~ N U ~«°• ~ L H a~ ~ rn iii ` ~ ~ a E ~ ~ ~ . ~ 0 ~ ~ W ~ c p c m n "'' N °~ ~ N ~ rn p ~ ~ u~ io ~ ~ m c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U Q ~ a ii ~ U H ~ a a ATTACHMENT C c O O ' O ~ O c ~ N ~ Q. LPL ~ Q r ~ Q O _ ~ G1 O ~ ~ V ~ } LL d O O c 0 ~ N ~ O ~ ~ c ~ Z O E N N U ° ` N U v c , ~ 3 o a~ ~ ~. N O O ~ fn N N N O J O O fl. U ~ 0 O C C O O O ~ N O c N . ~ : 1 ~ N ` N C N N . ~ m N N ( 0 fl. ~~ C ~_ fl Y ~ N f0 N C ~ L . _ +. d ' ~~ ~ c C ~ O O O O O ` C~ ~ E .~ >~ m "-. ~ r,r D1 ~ U ~ ~ ~ C C ~ c O U U c ~ "a U ~ .~ (0 N N ~,., .L ~ _ ~f0 _ ~U O U N fl O~ ~- O N 3 ~ p_ ` E p N U fl. ~ 0 0 a ~ - a~ a ~c c ~ n ~ o U a ~ m N V d N m ~ ~ ~ ~ c cn ~ ~ U r c c~ -a N E ~ fl. ~ c ~ , 0,, }' c w V ~ c ~ N ca ~ a c ~ , c0 Z ~ ~ li m p „ Q t o J j N ~ °orn orn O ~ °oo , ~ 3 °~ ° 00 O I~ O N O ~ O O~ ~ O c ~ ti ~ _U oa o ~ O ~ r ~ r fl- ~ tf) - N f~ ~ ~ r EA EA EA EA ~ EA EA LL EA EA ~ E!~ EA ~ I~ O ~ ~ (D ~ (O C d tM O ~ ~ ~ (fl O ~ '= v O ~ O N O ~ C r r ~ N ~ ~R R d m G' '= _ I 0 0 0 N m 0 a` ~ ti N N d' N ~3 ~, r~ ++ ~ O ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ Cfl ~ 00 ~ O DO I~ M N ~ M O N ~ to M N N p£~ r to ~ O ~ O N N r M N fh M O ~ ~ ~ LL d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~- ~- r ~ to In (O N O O to r O (O ~ N ~ M N ~- N M CO M N = ~ O ti N to ti (O N O ~ r-+ v ~ M N ~ `ct N d' t d C. •- Z L d ~ 69 ~ Q N .~ •+ U > C d C ~ C N C d _ C ~ R Q a~ > O N N U C ~ td ~ ~ N O W N ~ U N 2 R C1 ~ O ~' ~ O -p Q ~ U Z N N ~ ' W ~ d C ; ~ m U -p m U o c + + ~ a~ U'd ~ ~ ~ c +; N Y co ~~ N U o ~ ~ ~ x +° U C7 Q a c°~ .a Q ~ > ~ w o z c o H 0 H M m rn m a 0 0 0 a Q N m Vl X N _O O O } i N O O N rn v ACTION NO. ITEM NO . d "'"` AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 14, 2000 AGENDA ITEM: Petition by the DePaul Family Services, Inc. for tax exempt status pursuant to Article X, Section 6 (a) (6) of the Constitution of Virginia COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This petition by the DePaul Family Services, Inc. seeks tax exempt status in accordance with the Constitution of Virginia. The real estate consists of 2.33 acres located at 5650 Hollins Road. The assessed value of this real estate is $759, 900 and the real estate taxes would be $8,586. DePaul will agree to pay a 20% service fee. BACKGROUND: The Constitution establishes the requirements and qualifications of tax exempt organizations. Section 30-19.04 of the State Code establishes the procedural requirements for organizations seeking tax exempt status by designation from the General Assembly. This procedure includes a public hearing, adoption of a resolution, and certain findings by the local governing body, before action by the General Assembly. DePaul has submitted an application to the County for tax exempt status, which is attached. DePaul has submitted to staff materials which provides a more complete description of its services, which are attached to this report. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: DePaul is an organization associated with Catholic Charities USA. It is a private, non-profit child placing agency licensed by the State Department of Social Services. It provides specialized foster care for children and adolescents, day programs for mental retardation, and clinical services programs. The applicable provision of the Constitution is as follows: Article X. Section 6. Exempt property. - (a) Except as otherwise provided in this Constitution, the following U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\GENERAL\depaul.rpt.wpd 1 l ""` property and no other shall be exempt from taxation, State and local, including inheritance taxes: (6) Property used by its owner for religious, charitable, patriotic, historical, benevolent, cultural, or public park and playground purposes, as may be provided by classification or designation by a t:hree- fourths vote of the members elected to each house of the General Assembly and subject to such restrictions and conditions as may be prescribed. The applicable provision of the State Code is Section 58.1- 3650: A. The real and personal property of an organization designated by a section within this article and usoed by such organization exclusively for a religious, charitable, patriotic, historical, benevolent, cultural or public park and playground purpose as set forth in Article X, Section 6 (a) (6) of the Constitution of Virginia, the particular purpose for which such organization is classified being specifically set forth within each section, shall be exempt from taxation so long as such organization is operated not for profit and the property so exempt is used in accordance with the purpose for which the organization is classified. In addition, such exemption may be revoked in accoY~dance with the provisions of §§ 58.1-3605. B. Exemptions of property from taxation under this article shall be strictly construed in accordance: with the provisions of Article X, Section 6 (f) o:E the Constitution of Virginia. The Board shall conduct a public hearing on this request before adopting a resolution supporting or refusing to support such exemption. Before adopting any such resolution the Board shall consider the following questions: 1. Whether the organization is exempt from taxation pursuant to Section 501 (c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1959:; 2. Whether a current annual alcoholic beverage license for serving alcoholic beverages has been issued by the Virginia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board to such organization, for use on such property; 3. Whether any director or officer of the organization is paid compensation in excess of a reasonable allowance for salaries or other compensation for personal services which such director or officer actually renders; U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\GENERAL\depaul.rpt.wpd 2 -l 4. Whether any part of the net earnings of such organization inures to the benefit of any individual, and whether any significant portion of the service provided by such organization is generated by funds received from donations, contributions or local, state or federal grants. As used in this subsection, donations shall include the providing of personal services or the contribution of in kind or other material services; 5. Whether the organization provides services for the common good of the public; 6. Whether a substantial part of the activities of the organization involves carrying on propaganda, or otherwise attempting to influence legislation and whether the organization participates in, or intervenes in, any political campaign on behalf of any candidate for public office; 7. No rule, regulation, policy, or practice of the organization discriminates on the basis of religious conviction, race, color, sex or national origin; 8. The revenue impact to the locality and its taxpayers of exempting the property; and 9. Any other criteria, facts and circumstances which the governing body deems pertinent to the adoption of such resolution. DePaul will agree to execute an agreement with the County for the payment of a 20% service fee in lieu of taxation. FISCAL IMPACTS: Tax exempt status will result in a loss of taxable revenue of the value of the land and any structures ($8,586 per year). This will be offset in part by the 20°s service fee. ALTERNATIVES: After the public hearing the Board may decide to support this exemption by the approval of the attached resolution; or it may decide to refuse to support this exemption. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board carefully consider this application for tax exempt status. There are many attributes of this organization that are indistinguishable from taxable entities. The Board has previously expressed its concerns with respect to the erosion of the County's tax base. U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\GENERAL\depaul.rpt.wpd 3 -. Respectfully submitted, Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved Denied Received Referred to Motion by Vote No Yes Church Johnson McNamara Minnix Nickens Abs U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\GENERAL\depaul.rpt.wpd 4 J ." / AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2000 RESOLUTION TO THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY SUPPORTING TAX EXEMPTION OF PROPERTY OWNED BY DEPAUL FAMILY SERVICES, INC. AND USED FOR ITS CHARITABLE, EDUCATIONAL, AND RECREATIONAL PURPOSES ON A NON-PROFIT BASIS WHEREAS, DePaul Family Services, Inc. (DePaul) has petitioned this Board for support of a bill to be introduced at the 2001 Session of the Virginia General Assembly to exempt certain property of DePaul from taxation pursuant to Article X, Section 6(a)(6) of the Constitution of Virginia; and WHEREAS, a public hearing at which all citizens had an opportunity to be heard with respect to the Foundation's request was held by the Board on November 14, 2000; and WHEREAS, the provisions of subsection B of Section 30-19.04 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, have been examined and considered by the Board; and WHEREAS, DePaul agrees that the property to be exempt from taxation is the property of DePaul Family Services, Inc. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That, in accordance with Section 30-19.04 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, the Board supports an exemption from taxation under Article X, Section 6 (a)(6) of the Constitution of Virginia of property owned and used by DePaul Family Services, Inc. for its charitable, educational, and benevolent purposes. This U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\GENERAL\depaul.resolution.wpd 1 ~ '` resolution is adopted by the Board after holding a public hearing with respect hereto as to which public notice was given and at which citizens had an opportunity to be heard. In adopting this Resolution, the Board has examined and considered the provisions of subsection B of Section 30-19.04 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. The assessed value of the property owned and used by DePaul is $759,900 and the property tax is $8,586. The Tax Parcel No. of the property owned by DePaul is 28.13-1-27.3. 2. The Clerk is directed to forward an attested copy of this Resolution to the Chairman of the Committee of the General Assembly considering the designation of property to be exempt from taxation pursuant to Article X, Section 6(a)(6) of the Constitution of Virginia, to the Commissioner of the Revenue and the Treasurer for Roanoke County, and to DePaul Family Services, Inc. U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\GENERAL\depaul.resolution.wpd 2 ~/ Telephone O O (809) CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF RICHMOND ass-SSSI Finance Office WATS (800) 811 Cathedral Place Richmond, Virginia 23220 552-3952 August 29, 1986 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN This is to certify that the enclosed is an exact copy of the annual group ruling issued to the Catholic Diocese of Richmond and all other Catholic Dioceses in the United States by the Internal Revenue Service granting tax exemption from income taxes for such Dioceses and its adjunct activities listed in the Catholic Directory each year. This is to further certify that DePaul Children's Services, Inc. is listed in the 1985 Catholic Directory on page 722 and that this activity is and continues to be an adjunct activity of the Catholic Diocese of Richmond. John F. Barrett `~1b1~~ ~~~ ll l Encl . ~ ~~~, s~~`t, ~e ~la ~~ ~~.~-~ ~c~( ~~~ i ~~ C a ~~~ ~ ~ ti. ~s.,J1s,~ ~`<. ~ ` , ~~'~ r ~~' I ~ !j ~~ ~ ~ ~; 1111 ,v' ~` / "'- Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury District Director D United States Catholic Conference 1312 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.. Washington, D.C. 20005 Person to Contact: R. D. Morris Telephone Number: 488-3100 Refer Repiy to: EP/E0:7204 Date: JUN 3 0 1985 Dear S ir: In a ruling dated March 25, 1946, we held that the agencies and instrumentalities and all educational, charitable and religious institutions operated, supervised, or controlled by or in connection with the Roman Catholic Church Official Catholic Directory for 1946,-are entitled to exemption from Federal income tax under the provisions of section 101(6) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, which corresponds to section 501(c)(3) of the 1954 Code. This ruling has been updated annually to cover the activities added to or deleted from the Directory. The Official~Catholic Directory for 1986 shows the names or addresses of all agencies and instrumentalities and all educational, charitable, and religious institutions operated by the Roman Catholic Church in the IInited States, its territories and possessions in existence at the time the Director was published. It is understood that-each of these. is a non-profit organization, that no part of the net earnings thereof inures to the benefit of any individual, that no substantial part of their activities is for promotion of legislation, and that none are private foundations under section 509(a) of the Code. Based oa all information submitted, we conclude that the agencies and instrumentalities and educational, charitable, and religious institutions operated, supervised or controlled by or in connection with the Roman Catholic Church in the United States, its territories or possessions appearing in the Official Catholic Directory for 1986 are exempt from Federal income tax under section 501(c)(3) of the Code. Donors may deduct contributions to the agencies, instrumentalities and institutions referred to above, as provided by section 170 of the Code. Bequests, legacies, devises, transfers, or gifts to them or for their use are deductible for Federal estate and gift tax purposes under sections 2055, 2106, and 2522 of the Cede. ~~ t -2- United States Catholic Conference Beginning January 1,-1984, unless specifically excepted, you and your subordinates must pay .t ax under the Federal Insurance Contributions. Act (Social Security taxes) for each employee who is paid $100 or more in a calendar year. You and your subordinates are not liable for tax under the Federal Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA). Next year, within 90 days before the close of your annual accounting peziod, or by May 31, the date established by our letter of April 28, 1975, which gave an extension of time to file the information, please send one copy of the official Catholic Directory o-f 1987 for each Internal Revenue District in which one or more of your subordinates are located, with four additional copies to this office. The conditions concerning the retention of your group exemption as set fourth in our previous determination letter of April 17, 1983 remain in full force and effect. Sincerely yours, ~~ Teddy R. R ern District Director cc: Wilfred R. Caron General Counsel 1312 Massachusetts Ave., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005 Program details for DePaul Family Services -Roanoke Page 1 of 1 DePaul Family Services -Roanoke Telephone Numbers and Contact Information (540) 989-7355 Roanoke (804) 528-0184 Lynchburg (540) 381-1848 Christiansburg (804) 977-9847 Charlottesville (540) 623-0881 Charlottesville (540) 772-6930 Fax ., . , .. VA 24014 Operating Agency: DePaul Family Services Agency Type: Private, non-profit Person in charge: Herb Beskar Executive Director Hours of operation: Mon-Fri, 8:30 AM to 5:00 PM; Service hours: 24 hours/7 days. Fees: Charges for service. Accepts vendor payments. Eligibility requirements: Age 0-90. Persons referred for service must have a handicapping condition. Intake Procedure: Emergency service provided. Telephone referral accepted. Professional referral accepted. Area Served: Planning District 5. [ ] Don't list-Statewide About the program: Purpose: This is the Main Office of DePaul Family Services, a private, non-profit child placing agency licensed by the State Department of Social Services. They provide specialized foster care for children and adolescents. See their individual program listings for further details on their Treatment Foster Care, Mental Retardation and Clinical Services. Accessibility: Fully wheelchair accessible. http://www.ccs-roanoke.org/htmU820g5d40.htm 07/06/2000 ! ~- AGENCY HISTORY St. Vincent's Home, a residence for children, was established in 1893 by the Catholic Diocese of Richmond and administered by the Sisters of Charity of Nazareth, Kentucky, until June, 1975 at which time it was closed. On March 1, 1977, this agency was incorporated as The Achievement Center Specialized Foster Care, Inc.. Initially The Achievement Center and Specialized Foster Care shared space in the building which had been St. Vincent's Home; they also shared staff and had complementary missions. The Achievement Center was a residential school for ch~dren with learning disabilities. Specialized Foster Care placed children with special needs into Foster Care and also had a week- end program for children residing at the Achievement Center. Each agency graduaIly evolved with the Achievement Center closing its residential program in 1978 and this agency moving to Grandin Road in 1979. In 1981, there was a na~-re change ;v:tl~. DePaul Children's Services being chosen. As with the former orphanage, this agency is named after St. Vincent DePaul who lived in the 17th century helping the poor and caring for children. The Achievement Center and DePaul Children's Services continued to share an Administrator and office staff until 1984 at which time these remaining ties were dissolved. During 1984, DePaul Children's Services moved to offices on Starkey Road. In 1987 a branch office was opened in Lynchburg; in 1990 an office was established in Christiansburg; and in 1992 an office was opened in Charlottesville. Also in 1992 the name of the agency was changed to DePaul Family Services reflecting our focus on families and the development of the Mental Retardation Program through which we provide services primarily to adults. In 1995 we opened an office in Abingdon. In 1996 the Clinical Services Program was implemented offering In-Home Services with Out-Patient Services being added in 1998. The Mental Retardation Program established a Day Program in Lynchburg in 1998 with a second site opening in Roanoke in 1999. As we near the end of 1999 (10/12/99)- the Treatment Foster Care Program is offered out of all five offices with two-hundred twenty-five (225) children and adolescents in placement. This number includes six adolescents in our Supervised Independent Living Apartment Program. The Mental Retardation Program provides services out of the Roanoke and Lynchburg offices with four program components: Foster Care, Day Program, In-Home, and Respite Care. The two Day Programs have their own service locations. Eighty (80) individuals, mostly adults, are receiving services through the Mental Retardation Program. The Clinical Services Program provides services out of the Roanoke, Lynchburg, and Christiansburg offices with two program components, In-Home and Out-Patient Services. Currently there are twenty-six (26) active cases. ' ~ .,. ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION CF THE ACHIEVEMENT CENTER SPECIALIZED FOSTER CARE, INC. ~~ We hereby associate to form a non-stock corporation under the pro- visions of Chapter 2 of Title 13.1 of the Code of Virginia, and to that end set forth the following: I. Name. The name of the Corporation is The Achievement Center Specialized Foster Care, Inc. II. Purposes. The principal purpose for which the Corporation is formed is to establish, operate and supervise a program of placement of foster children and to provide for the personal, economic and social welfare needs of such children either directly or by purchase of such services to accomplish its purposes. The Corporation shall have the power to conduct any business of a "child placement agency" as defined in Chapter 10, Section 63.1 of the Code of Virginia of 1972 as amended. The corporation is formed and shall be operated exclusively for religious charitable, and educational purposes, and no part of its earnings shall inure to the benefit of any private individual or member; and it shall not engage in carrying on propaganda or otherwise attempting to influ- ence legislation, or participate or intervene in (including the publishing or distributing of statements any political campaign on behalf of any candidates for public office. Upon dissolution, the assets of the Corporation shall be distributed to St. Vincent's Home, Inc. III. Membership. The Corporation shall have no members. IV. Directors. The affairs of the Corporation shall be managed by a board of directors of »ut less than three persons ns fixed by the by-laws \ ~ " ~~ 9 ~` shall be divided into three classes: one class to serve cone-year term, one class Lo serve atwo-year term, and oni class to serve athree-year term. The succeeding directors of each class shall be elected-tor one term of three {3};years. All successor directors of each class shall be elected by the directors then serving. All vacancies from unexpired terns shall be filled by the directors. Y. Registered Office and Agent, The registered office of the Corporation is 301 First SLreet, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia, in the City of Roanoke, Virginia, and the name of its initial registered agent is Evans 8. Jesset. a resident of Virginia and a member of the Virginia State Bar, whose business address is 301 Ftrs t Street, S.W., Roanoke. Virginia Fi. Initial Board of Directors are: Phy111s Olin 175 27th Street Roanoke. Virginia 24014 Cyril J. Brunner 1b21 Lonna Drive, N.W. Roanoke, Ya. 24019 David J. Prestipino 1213 Nowbe rt Ave.. S.W. Roanoke, Va. ~. i i T- / .. j. ~~..~: . •~,:: ~VNII11UInIAVIINIi~V'iVIYN November 13, 2000 Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, VA 24018 Gentlemen: We petition the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia to adopt a resolution supporting our request to the Virginia General Assembly to exempt from taxation 2.33 acres of property we own at 5650 Hollins Road, Roanoke, Virginia (Tax Map No. 28.13-1-27.3). The. Code of Virginia requires that you consider certain questions before adopting this resolution: 1. Whether the organization is exempt from taxation pursuant to §501 (c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954. DePaul Family Services, Inc. is exempt from taxation under . §501 (c) of the Internal Revenue Code. 2. Whether a current annual alcoholic beverage license for serving alcoholic beverages has been issued by the Virginia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board to such organization, for use on such property. No license has been issued and none has been sought. We do not permit the consumption of alcohol at any function sponsored by DePaul Family Services. 3. Whether any director or officer of the organization is paid compensation in excess of a reasonable allowance for salaries or other compensation for personal services which such director or officer actually renders. Our directors and officers, with the exception of our Executive Director, serve without compensation. Our Executive Director is a full- time employee of the organization and receives a salary and benefits commensurate with his responsibilities. 4. Whether any part of the net earnings of such organization inures to the benefit of any ..individual, and whether any significant portion of the service provided by such organization is generated by funds received from donations, contributions or local, state or federal grants. As used in this subsection, donations shall include the providing of personal services or the contribution of in kind or other material services. DePaul Family Services is a non-stock Virginia corporation. Our earnings are MAIN OFFICE: 5650 Hollins Road, Roanoke, VA 24019 540-265-8923 Fax (540) 265-7663 BRANCH OFFICES: 2316 Atherholt Road Suite 107 Lynchburg, VA 24501 804-528-0184 Fax (804j 528-0187 8C College St, Suite F Christiansburg; VA 24073 540-381-1848 Fax (540j 381-5372 112 Goodman Street Charlottesville, VA 22902 804-977-9847 Fax (804) 977-2809 1 Ob Abingdon. Place Abingdon, VA 14211 540-623-0881 Fax (540j 623-0002 Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia November 13, 2000 Page 2 used only to support current and future operations and no earnings of the organization inure to the benefit of any individual. A small part of our services are funded by a state grant to coordinate the Foster/Adoptive Care Training System (F.A.C.T.S.) Program for the Western region of Virginia. An insignificant amount of our funding is derived from donations and contributions. 5. Whether the organization provides services for the common good of the public. DePaul Family Services is a private, non-profit, non-sectarian human services agency incorporated in 1977. The agency sponsors three programs which provide services to children, adolescents, adults, and families. The Treatment Foster Care Program places children and adolescents. in foster homes and provides full casework services. The Mental Retardation Program has four components including foster care and day programs. Clinical Services provides in-home and outpatient services. Referrals are accepted from local Departments of Social Services, Juvenile Courts, FAPT teams, Community Service Boards, other public agencies, and from private individuals. 6. Whether a substantial part of the activities of the organization involves carrying on propaganda, or otherwise attempting to influence legislation and whether the organization participates in, or intervenes in, any political campaign on behalf of any candidate for public office. DePaul Family Services does not carry on any lobbying activity nor do we participate in any political campaigns. 7. No rule, regulation, policy, or practice of the organization discriminates on the basis of religious conviction, race,. color,. sex or national origin. DePaul Family Services is an Equal Opportunity Employer and we have no rule, regulation, policy or practice that discriminates on the basis of religious conviction, race, color, sex or national origin. 8. The revenue impact to the locality and its taxpayers of exempting the property. The assessed value of the property is $759,000. The loss of real estate tax revenues of $8,586 would be partially offset by an annual service fee in lieu of taxation for necessary and essential governmental services provided by the county equal to twenty percent of the County's real estate .tax levies were DePaul not exempt .from local taxation. Presently, the fee would be $1,717 resulting in a net revenue impact of $6,869, annually. 9. Any other criteria, facts and circumstances which the governing body deems pertinent to the adoption of such resolution. ~. r. .. 1 ACTION N0. ITEM NO. `''~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER PREETING DATE: November 14, 2000 ~~GENDA ITEM: Withdrawal of the Special Use Permit request of US Cellular Corporation for broadcasting tower located on John Richardson Road, Hollins Magisterial District (~OUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ]3ACKGROUND The attorney for the applicant has notified Roanoke County ~~f their desire to withdraw this request from further ~~onsideration. This withdrawal request was submitted subsequent ~~o a finding by the Virginia Department of Historic Resources ;:hat the construction of a tower on this site would be a .significant impact on the National Register property on the ;adjoining site (Harshbarger House). STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: 1. Accept withdrawal request. ~ t .•. 2 Respectfully Submitted, Approved, Terrance H rington, AICP Elmer C. Hodge Departm nt of Community Development County Administrator Action Vote No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Church _ Johnson McNamara Minnix Nickens ~ ~ ~- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2000 ORDINANCE 111400-7 AMENDING AND REENACTING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE VIRGINIA BY THE MODIFICATION OF STANDARDS FOR ZERO LOT LINE AND SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT IN RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS WHEREAS, in 1992, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors adopted a new zoning ordinance for Roanoke County, including standards for zero lot line and single family attached housing developments within the county; and, WHEREAS, The Roanoke County Planning Commission has considered increasing allowable building coverage in zero lot line and single family attached housing developments; and, WHEREAS, public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice support an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance of the County of Roanoke to allow increased building coverage in zero lot line and single family attached housing developments; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this amendment on November 7, 2000; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors held first reading of this ordinance on October 24, 2000, and second reading and public hearing on November 14, 2000; and, WHEREAS, public notice and advertisement of this amendment has been provided as required by Section 15.2-2204 of the Code of Virginia, and the Roanoke County Code. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: That the Zoning Ordinance of the County of Roanoke is hereby amended and reenacted to provide as follows: I. ARTICLE IV. SECTION 30-82 (RESIDENTIAL USES) IS HEREBY AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: Amend Section 30-82-12 (B) 4 as follows: 4. Maximum building coverage: Forty (40) percent. ~5. No two dwelling units built under these provisions shall be attached along the common property line (See Single Family, Attached). ~. A perpetual five-foot wall-maintenance easement shall be provided on the lot adjacent to the zero lot line property line. This easement shall be kept clear of structures or any other improvement which would infringe on the use of the easement, with the exception of freestanding walls and fences. This easement shall be shown on the plat and incorporated into each deed transferring title to the property. fi7. A copy of the plat approved by the subdivision agent of the County shall be submitted to the administrator. The administrator shall make the appropriate notation on the official zoning map that the affected lots have been approved for zero lot line dwellings. Amend Section 30-82-13 (B) 3 as follows: 3. Maximum building coverage: Forty (40) percent. 34. A copy of the plat approved by the subdivision agent of the County shall be submitted to the administrator. The administrator shall make the appropriate notation on the official zoning map that the affected lots have been approved for attached dwellings. 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after November 14, 2000. On motion of Supervisor McNamara to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: yYC~.y- tel. Q.e,r~-.` Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors 2 cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, County Planner Circuit Court Roy B. Willett, Judge Clifford R. Weckstein, Judge Diane McQ. Strickland, Judge Richard C. Pattisall, Judge Robert P. Doherty, Jr., Judge Jonathan M. Apgar, Judge Steven A. McGraw, Clerk Juvenile Domestic Relations District Court Joseph M. Clarke, II, Judge Philip Trompeter, Judge John B. Ferguson, Judge Joseph P. Bounds, Judge Ruth P. Bates, Clerk Intake Counsellor General District Court George W. Harris, Judge William Broadhurst, Judge Vincent Lilley, Judge Julian H. Raney, Judge Jacqueline F. Ward Talevi, Judge Theresa A. Childress, Clerk Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Magistrates Sherri Krantz/Betty Perry Main Library Ray Lavinder, Police Chief Richard Burch, Chief of Fire & Rescue Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke 24016 Roanoke County Law Library, Singleton Osterhoudt Roanoke County Code Book Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator Dan O'Donnell, Assistant County Administrator Diane D. Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer O. Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Michael Lazzuri, Court Services Elaine Carver, Director, Information Technology Anne Marie Green, Director, General Services Thomas S. Haislip, Director, Parks, Recreation & Tourism Gardner Smith, Director, Procurement John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Valuation Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue 3 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. L/ "" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 14, 2000 AGENDA ITEM: Petition of the Roanoke County Planning Commission to amend and re-enact Sections 30-82-12 and 30-82-13 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance to make minor revisions to use and design standards for certain single family residential developments. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: D~~-~'"~,,~ BACKGROUND: In September, 2000 several housing developers and design engineers raised questions about the maximum building coverage regulations in the R1 zoning district, with respect to zero lot line subdivisions. They pointed out that, while the zero lot line option allows up to a twenty percent reduction in lot area for individual lots, the maximum allowable building coverage was not adjusted accordingly. The net effect was that choosing the zero lot line option, and the reduced lot area, resulted in less allowable building footprint than if they chose a standard subdivision design. Since the market for homes in the zero lot line neighborhoods is for single floor living, often with garages, the structures are requiring larger building footprints than some two-story homes on standard subdivision designs. Staff also pointed out that the reduced lot area option is available in the use and design standards for single family attached homes. At the October 3, 2000 work session, the Planning Commission approved a consent agenda that included an amendment to the use and design standards for Zero Lot Line, and Single Family Attached housing developments. The proposed amendment would offer a greater maximum building coverage for lots less than 7,200 square feet. Since the approval of the consent agenda, staff was asked to reconsider the threshold of 7,200 square feet, below which maximum building coverage would be increased to 40%. The increase to 40% building coverage is not disputed, but the issue was raised that the 7,200 square foot threshold created inconsistencies in allowable building size. Keith Rastorfer with Lumsden Associates has drawn a graph to illustrate the inconsistencies. The graph is attached for your reference. ..- "". ., 2 At their November 7, 2000 public hearing, the Planning Commission again discussed the issue and concurred to delete the threshold of 7,200 square feet lot area from the proposed ordinance amendment. The proposed amendments to §30-82-12 and §30-82-13 are attached. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: Approval of the proposed amendment as recommended by the Planning Commission on November 7, 2000. Respectfully Submitted, Terrance . Harri gton, AICP Depart ent of Community Development Approved, ~yx.~ /~/ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Action Approved () Motion by Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Vote No Yes Abs Church Johnson McNamara Minnix Nickens ,~ PETITIONER: ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION CASE NUMBER: 32-11/2000 Planning Commission Hearing Date: November 7, 2000 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: November 14, 2000 A. REQUEST Petition of the Roanoke County Planning Commission to amend and re-enact Sections 30-82-12 and 30-82-13 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance to make minor revisions to use and design standards for certain single family residential developments. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS None C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION None D. CONDITIONS None E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Witt moved to recommend approval of the petition. The motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Ross, Witt, Thomason, Hooker, Robinson NAYS: None ABSENT: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report _ Other Terrance ringto ecretary Roanok County Planning Commission PROJECT _ TYPE CONTENTS ..... G..'/ Lumsden Associates, P.C. ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PLANNERS DATE COMM NO. PREL. FINAL SHEET NO. CAL. BY CKD. BY I ' ! i ! - ~ 1 1Rl 7 .. , ~ , V 0 I 1 ~f!/ ~ n^~~ 1~` i _ 1 I i u ~ { _. ~ r 3 "" ~~ ~ .~ i ~ I. ' ~ _. ~ ~ r i j ~ ~ _ p ~ - ..R J '~,a~ i ~ . ~ ~ I r ~ ~- ~ O I j ~ ~ ~ ~ I _.. ~ _' (~ ~~4 ~~~ ~ ~ y t 1 I ~ ~ ~ ~ d~ %; c~.~~'~E ~ - 4 /~ ~_ ~ ~c ~ ~ _ ; !~. ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ , ~ I ~ I 2 '"~ ~ ~~a ~~~. 1 on ~~ 4 ~ .._ , ,_ _ _ .___ , - __ __ _ _ . _ .. __- ~ I ~ _ _ __ ,,~_ c,.w _ , ~n r...cr~ _ _. __ _ _ n.. ~~. ~ I ~ ,, 2~ 0 5 ~'. m _ _ _ - ~ o __ _ __ _. _ _ ,~ __ EXHIBIT ~/ _" Petition of Roanoke County Planning Commission Revised Amendments to Sec. 30-82-12, and 30-82-13 11 /7/2000 Sec. 30-82-12 Single Family, Detached (Zero Lot Line Option) (A) Intent. The following zero lot line provisions are intended to offer greater flexibility in providing a variety of housing options to meet the changing demands and needs of the public, while providing standards which afford a reasonable degree of protection for surrounding properties. (B) In the R-1, R-2, R-3 or R-4 districts, within a common development, one interior yard may be equal to zero for single family detached dwellings, subject to the following additional criteria: 1. Minimum tract size of the common development: Three (3) acres or on tracts less than three (3) acres with a special use permit from the Board of Supervisors pursuant to Section 30-19. 2. The minimum lot size, frontage and front and rear yard setbacks required in the District Regulations may be reduced up to twenty (20) percent, however the normal front, rear, and side yard setback requirement must be maintained adjacent to any lot or public street or right-of--way not within the common development, or not otherwise designated for zero lot line use. 3. Minimum side yard opposite the zero yard: Ten (10) feet. 4. MaYimumbuiidilig coverage: Forty (4~?~erccnt. . No two dwelling units built under these provisions shall be attached along the common property line (See Single Family, Attached). . A perpetual five-foot wall-maintenance easement shall be provided on the lot adjacent to the zero lot line property line. This easement shall be kept clear of structures or any other improvement which would infringe on the use of the easement, with the exception of freestanding walls and fences. This easement shall be shown on the plat and incorporated into each deed transferring title to the property. . A copy of the plat approved by the subdivision agent of the County shall be submitted to the administrator. The administrator shall make the appropriate notation on the official zoning map that the affected lots have been approved for zero lot line dwellings. (Ord. No. 42694-12, § 15, 4-26-94; Ord. No. 042799-11, § 2, 4-27-99) 1 --f " Sec. 30-82-13 Single Family, Attached (A) Intent. The following provisions are intended to offer greater flexibility in providing a variety of housing options to meet the changing demands and needs of the public. The standards below are intended to accommodate new developments of attached single family dwellings, as well as to allow attached single family dwellings as in-fill development on scattered sites in existing residential areas. (B) General standards within a common development containing three or more acres: 1. The minimum lot size, frontage, and front and rear yard setbacks required in the district regulations may be reduced up to twenty (20) percent, however the normal front, rear, and side yard setback requirement must be maintained adjacent to any lot or public street or right-of--way not within the common development, or not otherwise designated for zero lot line use. 2. Minimum side yard opposite the common lot line between two attached dwellings: Ten (10) feet. 3. Maximtui~ building cover~e: Forty (40) pet~ent~ ~4. A copy of the plat approved by the subdivision agent of the County shall be submitted to the administrator. The administrator shall make the appropriate notation on the official zoning map that the affected lots have been approved for attached dwellings. (C) General standards on existing lots or in new developments containing less than three acres: 1. Minimum side yard opposite the common lot line between two (2) attached dwellings: Ten (10) feet. (D) Public street frontage shall not be required for any proposed lot of record platted for single family attached development within R-3 and R-4 districts. (Ord. No. 42694-12, § 16, 4-26-94; Ord. No. 042799-11, § 2, 4-27-99) 2 r'~ " .~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2000 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE VIRGINIA BY THE MODIFICATION OF STANDARDS FOR ZERO LOT LINE AND SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT IN RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS WHEREAS, in 1992, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors adopted a new zoning ordinance for Roanoke County, including standards for zero lot line and single family attached housing developments within the county; and, WHEREAS, The Roanoke County Planning Commission has considered increasing allowable building coverage in zero lot line and single family attached housing developments; and, WHEREAS, public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice support an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance of the County of Roanoke to allow increased building coverage in zero lot line and single family attached housing developments; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this amendment on November 7, 2000; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors held first reading of this ordinance on October 24, 2000, and second reading and public hearing on November 14, 2000; and, WHEREAS, public notice and advertisement of this amendment has been provided as required by Section 15.2-2204 of the Code of Virginia, and the Roanoke County Code. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Zoning Ordinance of the County of Roanoke is hereby amended and reenacted to provide as follows: I. ARTICLE IV. SECTION 30-82 (RESIDENTIAL USES) IS HEREBY AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: Amend Section 30-82-12 (B) 4 as follows: _ .~ ~ - ~. ~~laxinlum buildi><Zg ...coverage: leorty O~,ercent' ~. No two dwelling units built under these provisions shall be attached along the common property line (See Single Family, Attached). . A perpetual five-foot wall-maintenance easement shall be provided on the lot adjacent to the zero lot line property line. This easement shall be kept clear of structures or any other improvement U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\CODE\zero.lot.line.wpd 1 • w'~y ., *~ ~ which would infringe on the use of the easement, with the exception of freestanding walls and fences. This easement shall be shown on the plat and incorporated into each deed transferring title to the property. . A copy of the plat approved by the subdivision agent of the County shall be submitted to the administrator. The administrator shall make the appropriate notation on the official zoning map that the affected lots have been approved for zero lot line dwellings. Amend Section 30-82-13 (B) 3 as follows: 3. Maximum buildin~,co~~erage ~Fc~rt~° ~4Q) percent . A copy of the plat approved by the subdivision agent of the County shall be submitted to the administrator. The administrator shall make the appropriate notation on the official zoning map that the affected lots have been approved for attached dwellings. 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after November 14, 2000. U:\WPDOCSWGENDA\CODE\zero.lot.line.wpd 2 ~~ y AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2000 ORDINANCE 111400-8 GRANTING SPECIAL USE PERMITS TO CStH ENTERPRISES, L.L.C. AND RISING STAR SPORTS 8~ ADVENTURE CAMP TO OPERATE A CAMP AND A DAY CARE CENTER TO BE LOCATED AT 5488 YELLOW MOUNTAIN ROAD (TAX MAP N0.99.00-2- 6.2), CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, CStH Enterprises, L.L.C. and Rising StarSports Adventure Camp have filed petitions for special use permits to operate a camp and a day care to be located at 5488 Yellow Mountain Road (Tax Map No. 99.00-2-6.2) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on November 7, 2000; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on October 24, 2000; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on November 14, 2000. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of special use permits to C&H Enterprises, L.L.C. and Rising Star Sports & Adventure Camp to operate a camp and a day care to be located at 5488 Yellow Mountain Road (Tax Map No. 99.00-2-6.2) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 2000 Community Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.2-2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved with the following conditions: 1 (1) Day Program A. The After School Day Program will operate following the schedule of the Roanoke Area School Calendars. One hundred and fifty (150) campers shall be allowed. Two-hundred (200) campers shall be allowed beginning in September 2002, excluding half-day campers. B. The morning half-day program will be as follows: -There shall be a maximum of 25 children, 3.5 to 5 years old. -The program shall operate two days per week, 9:30am to 12:30pm. -The program will operate following the schedule of the Roanoke Area School Calendars. C. The program shall maintain a state day care license. (2) Summer Camps A. The program will operate following the schedule of the Roanoke Area School Calendars. One hundred and fifty (150) campers shall be allowed. Two-hundred (200) campers shall be allowed beginning in June 2002, including half-day campers. (3) Developmental Team Camps A. The camps will operate 6:OOpm to 9:OOpm Monday thru Friday. The gate will close at 9:30 pm, except during indoor soccer season, (November 15 -February 15) when operating hours will be to 10:OOpm and the gate shall close at 10:30pm. 2 B. Saturday hours shall be from 9:OOam to 9:OOpm. (Gate shall close at 9:30pm). C. Sunday hours shall be 1:OOpm to 6:OOpm except during indoor soccer season (November 15 -February 15) when operating hours shall be until 9:OOpm (Gate shall close at 9:30pm). D. All camps shall be run by Rising Star staff. E. All camp enrollments shall be individual. All instruction shall be given by Rising Star staff. (4) Single Function Clinics A. Single function clinics of up to a maximum of four (4) hours would be permitted during operating hours. (5) Weekend Tournaments A. No more than 8 outdoor (3 Fall, 3 Spring, 2 Summer) and 16 indoor tournaments shall be held during any calendar year. All tournaments (except Commonwealth Games) shall be sponsored and operated by Rising Star. B. No more than 20 teams shall participate in any indoor tournament. No more than 10 teams shall participate in any outdoor tournament. C. Pre-registration, with Rising Star, shall be required for all tournament teams. 3 D. Tournaments could be held on Friday evening, Saturday, and Sunday during normal operating hours as set above, except that Sunday tournaments can be held between the hours of 10:OOam and 6:OOpm. E. Abutting property owners shall be notified in writing one week in advance of all tournaments. (6) Operations A. Lighting shall not be provided for any outdoor field, court or other athletic area. B. There shall be no loud speakers or other sound amplification device used on Rising Star property. C. Rising Star shall not allow or encourage the parking of any vehicle associated with Rising Star on Yellow Mountain Road. This parking prohibition shall be publicized in Rising Star publications and newsletters. D. No alcoholic beverages shall be allowed on the property. E. No outside vendors shall be allowed on Rising Star property. F. No professional or semi-professional sports teams shall be allowed to play or practice at Rising Star except Roanoke Steam, subject to the following conditions: 1. No other professional sports team would be allowed to practice at Rising Star other than the Roanoke Steam due to its uniqueness. 4 2. There would be no alcohol or profanity allowed. 3. No loud speakers permitted. 4. No buses would be allowed for transportation of the Roanoke Steam. 5. Use of the Rising Star facility would be within the operating hours of 9:00 a. m. to 10:00 p. m. 6. This would be one season limit for year 2001 only. (7) Holida~Closings A. Rising Star shall be closed on the following holidays: New Year's Day, Easter, Memorial Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Eve, Christmas Day. (8) Activity Supervision A. Rising Star's personnel shall be present in a supervisory role at the site at all times. (9) Physical Development A. The site shall be developed generally in accord with a concept plan entitled "Concept Plan, Pollock Soccer Camp, Yellow Mountain Road, Prepared by Lang Engineering, and dated June 19, 1997. B. A 4-foot high chain link fence shall be installed on the property line along the entire length of the two athletic fields, where these fields adjoin Roanoke County Tax Parcel 98.04-1-23, said parcel currently owned by Donald Dean. The fence will be installed by August 2001. 5 C. A maximum of 12, 6-foot tall pine trees shall be planted and maintained, and evenly spaced along the mutual property line of Darlene Overstreet (98.04-1-21.1), where said property line abuts the athletic field. The trees shall be planted by August 2001. D. Rising Star will install and maintain a marker ribbon 200 feet from the property line of Clovis Hartman (Tax Parcels 99.00-2-13, 14, and 15). Children shat! not be allowed within this 200 foot boundary. 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance amended with six additional conditions concerning Roanoke Steam's use of the camp, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Terry Harrington, County Planner John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Valuation Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 6 i~ i~ t'O .. L.. ,,.~ --- ,~ PETITIONER: C and H Enterprises (Rising Stars Sports Camp) CASE NUMBER: 33-11/2000 Planning Commission Hearing Date: November 7, 2000 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: November 14, 2000 A. REQUEST Request of C and H Enterprises for Special Use Permits for a Camp and Day Care Center located at 5488 Yellow Mountain Road ,Cave Spring Magisterial District B. CITIZEN COMMENTS Eight citizens spoke on behalf of the request stating that they have children at Rising Stars and that the facilities and programs offer a unique experience for children, not offered anywhere else. Mr. Mike Wray speaking on behalf of the neighborhood committee commented on the operating conditions jointly negotiated by Mr. Pollock and the citizens. He advised the Commission that the citizens generally supported these conditions. Ms. Deb Smith, advised the Commission that the neighborhood is not "anti-children". She reminded the Commission that the property is zoned AG-3 and that AG-3 protections for the neighbors should be provided. She said that the issue has always been one of zoning compliance, and the sports camp should be required to comply with zoning. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION Mr. Witt commented that he believed it was an appropriate location for this type of facility. He commended Mr. Pollock and the neighbors for working out the conditions. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS See attached E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Witt suggested changes to the conditions pertaining to the required trees and fence, and with these suggested changes, moved approval of the SUP's with conditions. AYES: Witt, Robinson, Ross, Hooker, Thomason NAYS: None F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE ~. , ~ None. ~ ;.,,~ G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report _ Other Terrance arring on, Secretary Roano a County Planning Commission "' Special Use Permit Conditions C and H Enterprises and Rising Stars Sports Camp November 6, 2000 Special Use Permit Requests for a Camp and Day Care Day Program A. The After School Day Program will operate following the schedule of the Roanoke Area School Calendars. One hundred and fifty (150) campers shall be allowed. Two-hundred (200) campers shall be allowed in September 2002, excluding half-day campers B.. The morning half-day program will be as follows: - There shall be a maximum of 25 children, 3.5 to 5 years old - The program shall operate two days per week, 9:30am to 12:30pm - The program will operate following the schedule of the Roanoke Area School Calendars. C. The program shall maintain a state day care license 2. Summer Camps A. The program will operate following the schedule of the Roanoke Area School Calendars. One hundred and fifty (150) campers shall be allowed. Two-hundred (200) campers shall be allowed in June 2002, including half-day campers. 3. Developmental Team Camps A. The camps will operate 6:OOpm to 9:OOpm Monday thru Friday. The gate will close at 9:30 pm, except during indoor soccer season, (November 15 -February 15) when operating hours will be to 10:00pm and the gate shall close at 10:30pm B. Saturday hours shall be from 9:OOam to 9:OOpm.. (Gate shall close at 9:30pm) C. Sunday hours shall be 1:OOpm to 6:OOpm except during indoor soccer season (November 15 -February 15) when operating hours shall be unti19:00pm (Gate shall close at 9:30pm) D. All camps shall be run by Rising Stars staff staff. E. All camp enrollments shall be individual. All instruction shall be given by Rising Stars 4. Single Function Clinics A. Single function clinics of up to a maximum of four (4) hours would be permitted during operating hours. "`"" 5. Weekend Tournaments A. No more than 8 outdoor (3 Fall, 3 Spring, 2 Summer) and 16 indoor tournaments shall be held during any calendar year. All tournaments (except Commonwealth Games) shall be sponsored and operated by Rising Stars. B. No more than 20 teams shall participate in any indoor tournament. No more than 10 teams shall participate in any outdoor tournament. C. Pre-registration ,with Rising Stars shall be required for all tournament teams. D. Tournaments could be held on Friday evening, Saturday and Sunday during normal operating hours as set above, except that Sunday tournaments can be held between the hours of 10:00am and 6:OOpm E. Abutting property owners shall be notified in advance of all tournaments. 6. Operations A. Lighting shall not be provided for any outdoor field, court or other athletic area. B. There shall be no loud speakers used on Rising Stars property C. Rising Stars shall not allow or encourage the parking of any vehicle associated with Rising Stars on Yellow Mountain Road. This parking prohibition shall be publicized in Rising Stars publications and newsletters. D. No alcoholic beverages shall be allowed on the property. E. No outside vendors shall be allowed on Rising Stars property. F. No professional or semi-professional sports teams shall be allowed to play or practice at Rising Stars. 7. Holiday Closings A. Rising Stars shall be closed on the following holidays: New Year's Day, Easter, Memorial Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Eve, Christmas Day. 8. Activity Supervision A. Rising Star's personnel shall be present in a supervisory role at the site at all times 9. Physical Development A. The site shall be developed generally in accord with a concept plan entitled "Concept Plan, Pollock Soccer Camp, Yellow Mountain Road, Prepared by Lang Engineering, and dated June 19, 1997 j ~.. B. A 4 foot high high chain link fence shall be installed on the property line along the entire length of the two athletic fields, where these fields adjoin Roanoke County Tax Parcel 98.04-1-23, said parcel currently owned by Donald Dean. The fence will be installed by August 2001 C. A maximum of 12, 6 foot high pine trees shall be installed and evenly spaced along the mutual property line of Darlene Overstreet (98.04-1-21.1), where said property line abuts the athletic field. The trees shall be installed by August 2001. D. Rising Star will install and maintain a marker ribbon 200 feet from the property line of Clovis Hartman (Tax Parcels 99.00-2-13, 14, and 15). Children shall not be allowed within this 200 foot boundary ~~d wob~ wd~e~zi Baez-ze-~i County'of Roanoke Community Development Planning & Zoning 5204 B~.rnard Drive P O Boy 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 (540) 772-2068 P'A~ {540} 772-2108 S`ta I slate t•eceived: ~ Received by; ,P."- ~' ~ ~ ' ~' Application ~_: n ~/i~ PGBZ.A dare: , ~ ~ Plaesrds iatucd: ~ ~~~ BOS date: ~ ~~~~ /' '" C9ye Number `s ~~ ..~ ~ - ~ , it ( .y~•ly t: y~~ k .: '_J; jhh f ~.Y fl.`~i/(..~ 1 'IfL~A rii~.l`{ :..-f }l'1 41 ! ', I..y1~ VF.1 ryl'J~~~1( ~~} IS..F~ t(.( ,. ~~7A~y ~l ).~. F~ 1'~{~4l~ YY (1~1~1. 1~:2: S^1 .1 (~( V 1} Li :tt w-l. 1 1+:* M14 C f~; 11 ~l $ry? ~ ~ 1 } ~Ir C- ` ~ . ~ 1.9:1.a" , [ V' f .• ~Ik~J •~ ~kt~ C L11~ ~~~1 CY '„ 1 t L ~. .vI ~+ r i. 1 ~'Al'~ ~y ~4 S¢ \ 1 ~ ~~i I... ~ Y .w~~~3'~Si~ ~ i~_'. ~/ ~. (_17'~iv IM) 1 "Y ~'1Yl/5~~{p 4 u `' ~ll<~ 'w) ~ "k7f 1 4. ~ it~ 1 1`.1. . ~ ~ ~ r $ '' ~ ' ~ ~ r ' . . ~ . . : l ul MI 1 l 1 4 42~IV 1 1 I ar~,r u ! r , k 1 1ft1 I 1"y lH \ i (t{/ ~ 9 1411.1y1 ~ ~ yl~. ~~I {hi f 'f .. 11 1 1 k ~ r f' - ~tt i ~y ~ F } S ' " ~"~ ~ l ~ t ~ " ~~ 2 k `~ " t' '~t I l ,.a ,t .n . w t i ,, ti ys I . r !!W~• t: x .t;. lJ.l i ? 1 _~ ~,., ~ ~ a I . r.+r ~ r~ ' Alli3: ~l ~ + :;~I,. . ~C', ~.~ . Check type of application filed (check all that apply) 0 Rezoning ~SpNt;ial Use 4 Variance Applicanu name address w/zip Phone• 774-7725 C ~ H Enterprises, L.L.C. and Rising Star Sports g 774-6612 Adventure Camp, 5488 YeIIow Nbuntain Road, Fax No. Roanoke, VA 24014 Owner's name/address w!z%p Phone: Same as Applicant Fax No. Pzoperty Location Magisterial District: Cave Spring 5488 YeIIow Nbuntain Road Roanoke, VA 24014 Community Planning area: CI earbrook Tax Map No.: ~ g 9.0 0 - 2 - 6.2 $xistiz~, Zoning: ~- 3 Size of parcel(s): Acres: 13.42 Existing Land Use: Camp tf v'1 7~; ","'„t rt nll t •!t'"kf f ~ f.. ,. Tt~~.'k 4. .Y, ~ ~C W~ L r .~y.r, r 1 ~ 1:~ l-1' "R ~\/JI ta. l r 1l z - J ._f _ yyyy; 111 ~l, v'')k 't~~ •,V1~ }~ f• t 4~ ~~{ d~~l; +~ r (~ 1 !~ ~ l ~ •SVk n 1 ,~ i F. C ~ ( Il~i~. 1~ ~11 0{~ T.; llt 1(4~'? f h Ir ~~1 !1 ~ M~~l'\ I Y Vet ,t~~r{~gd~~7 Vk.~p 1t~eU ~ ~ SF'~< C 1 11 1 ~ Q ~11~ n `~ j~l~ ( I ~il 1 S ~i ~ ~~~ ~ ' ! ~ - t ~1~ 1 ( ;t ~ ° 41` ~ ~ ~' ~~ p~~~ l ~~ ~~l 1I - C , . l `'C ,ilyl"R!a ~ :i' 4X~.f~ .1, 1<, r„ ~ ~ , i . ..x b~"r` ~I~ ^` Proposed Zoning: AG-3 w/ spec i a I exception for amp Proposed Land Use: ~o ,, Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and froniage requirements of the requested districC? Yes ~ No D IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUL~.D l~ rRST. Does the pazcei meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes ~ No ~ IF NO, A 1VAF.IANCE IS REQU>CI2ED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditiorLS being proffered with this request? Yes D No ~ J 1v1 .y"`` ~ S' :+$' )y P5'\.4 J 11~. tn. t. K'~`'rI ,14. A" 1` 4r., 1', V A I '::"p KIl1u.L JCL' ~i`~ !V !lam Y 11- 1.:- 'NI 4.l' ~ ~t ~ (1 t ~. (N 3k '~,(.1 ~ 1K ~'t T 1 L V f4 ~~.j /,:11.,f. v /'4. ~'1 \ u K: '~ 19 d 1a. ~1,~ 3 '`,'' a 4 r .~ Llt ~ $ ~' 1 y r~i' i 1 ~: i 7 , fC r ~: ~I ~ lN~+y S "` '< f 4:': > (' ` ~ . 1 y. t t , M! .M\ X 1 1~~~'I~L4~~~~J1~~~~~~ ~r~ `!lM`T~t, j~ (f l:Ir `{tF 4YG}11 4i T' 11 ~S "w (r 'K`k~ til :: (tFS \~n4r. ,~ ^rT -V, `y ; +]~'I5h ~~ 1\"t.t ,~:~1Tw lv~j~~v Variance•of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED !F ANX OF THESE IiTEMS ARE vIISSING OR Ni COMl''LETE. ~7 S Consultation 8 1!2" x 11" concept plan X Application fee Apglicadon Metes and bounds description X Proffers, if applicable X Justification Water and sewer applicstion X Adjoining property owners I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the property or the ownei s agent or contrsct purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner. ~j (~ ~ Owner's Signature meY or n erpri s, Rising Star Sports ~ Adventure Carnp County'of Roanoke Community Development Planning & Zoning 5204 Bernard Drive P O Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24Q18-0798 (540) 772-2068 PAX (540) 772-2108 For Staff Use Only Rate received: ~, ~ Received by; ~ , i .,1 r,~ AppIicstion ;ee: ~/~ ~` PCIBZA daze: ~1 Plsesrds issued: i/''r I ~~ BOS dstc: / ~'~ / ~~~ r S L•t].:C NuIIIOCr 'n 17. I.~`M. ~:..?.~j b '<l Ml rr~l ~. ~t~~~„~.lrw ~~-~I ~, f#~N YY1 r~' I F ,4 CS~1 ~~'~. ~y'n.~tl.`/"_.tt nR J:~/ 1. y,14-t/~ Sha w{~q'1' .V lY j'Y?,~If•lll~_~~i lei 4~.~1 :~~ l~ i~.t W ~ ~d~M. l~. ~'1'rs~~` ~1\~`d-~~~.~"~ ~'] '?~~1 :ES~rI \ JIJ' l~ ~41.~'l~~ ~hh'?h .~.~~ u;}1i ~'M~ .,o T~~lr}~vl}tC]~~;;~~ ~ I NI'~ll V ~ 1 ~\a~'PI~:~1%t~l]:'" ~~.~~. >r ~o~.l:. ~ 1.~ Y'~~ ' ~ ~ ~ r I S .. , , . p rl 1; ~ ~ca.~'.: f: r~3 11`'"~^i~T t. ~.; 1~1 ~. 5+ }a+ ~i ~~ .~q `., ~n K '~%tY..'~. .~,1.{1.t ~1~ w~^ 1 y, rq, . 4~.+~~ G31'. 'ry~ l4._ 1.t. ~,.~!- .... '~ iT .~ t,r~ y r 1n. u.t.5 II N ~~.1=, C'f't~~~.. ~1?~~~/?'1 :. ~n 'r.' f' t.+ k . !,+Vl ':. f. ~ 1~ ~ .: ,1~ f ~Pl(.~~I.~K •. ~' _ Check type of application fled (check cell that apply) 0 Rezoning Special Use 4 Variance Applicants nameladdress w/zip Phone• 774-7725 C E H Enterprises, L.L.C. and Rising Star Sports ~ 774-6612 Adventure Camp, 5488 Yellow Mountain Road, Fax No. Roanoke, VA 24014 Owner's name/address w/zip Phone: Same as Applicant . Fax No. Property Locatiszn Cave S r i Ma~steziall}istrict: p ~ 5488 Yellow Mountain Road Roanoke, VA 24014 Community Planning area: CI earbrook Tax Map No.: ~ 99.00-2-6.2 Existit~e Zoning: AG-3 cre 13.42 s: pazcel(s): A Size of xisting Land Use: Camp E y ,~ ,t.(~ \ t, e n ) f~~t l~( rlA~ ,„ "'iFy.°1l~ ~I~` i9„('~Z-Y~tI YL '~t'~~1~4 c4'~ t•~' dWY ay~~~~~r."1N ~, r ~,~s~- ~ t~l W yll~ F$.~,.W rN'~ nr j,'{.I~,~'' % ~ .n'~. .,~ at l+l F~~~1 ~I.(rd~1 ~1 ~ ]r' ~ uc ~ }i~^~ ', ~Y~- ]n~" N ni ~ 1. ~hl, ~r d ? cell Y ` C~~7i ~ '' ~ ~ h ~ 1 l t ~1Y: ~.[ t 1 ;.'~f d i JJ~~[[ ~c S~ .Y+r H dP L t ~ r ~~ ~ , i. . ~ :c ~t~,4,r ~s ~ ~t ,: ~, ~,:A f ~ , 1~ i ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ '~ ~ t ~ . "'vv«< , ~ n „~. ` .. ~ l ^ N! , .., ~ . AZT !`~ -' ' ,.- Proposed Zoning: AG-3 w/ spec i a 1 except i on f day care center '~ Proposed Laced Use: Day care center ------.---ti•_, Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes ~ No ~ )<F' NO, A VARIANCE ZS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the pazcel meet the minimum criteria fur the requested Use Type? Yes ~ No 4 IF NO, A VA.&I.4NCE 1'S REQUIRED FLiZST Lf rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes O No ~ 1}dyl .-t 1f.~ ~'Y rif'14\ k ,l: ki, ~. R?f~ I~~~ :.~(y tx,.l. V ^yY vlF t[I'41yFv~~'yL Y`_.I "(,{~1~ !~*'. !NI_ u,{~ -+~ C ( ~r if AN ~k:v ~r.+v j~`M'N' .W ~. 1 1 Arf~f' l ''`` 4.1 r1 ]'~' Yr ~~~-~ ]l~1 1,~~7Y~ Sh y ..~!'lV [s' `~ 4'WM ~A,tT~ ~ ~~.~~W'+ziY A./ ~lVy `S ~ } 7)~qq~ A f ' t fi P ~~~ ~i'l ~~t }At~ ~~F~t~f•l ' `` 1 l . 1 4 ~ / A~ } y "" C'l~ ( ... ',r ~'/.Jl M4'e 1~m i ~l .' ]Y ylrl' r4~v 1:. L F. r ll~r Cl k r ~/ I ~~14~ .. ~~ ~, '•. it ti .R,''.• .11 ~ 1. ~~ it ~'•hf ,f,M :>!, [7~ Ir ...~ w. n`r i _, 4J~'+ (T 11'h,'d~i n T.1 rl~l' Variance~of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT SE ACCEPTED T~' ANY Ok' THESE ITEMS ARE 1titISSING OR LNCOMPLETE. S V Consultation 8 112" x 11" concept plan X Application fee Applicadoa - Metes and bounds desc-iption X Proffers, if applicable X Justificstion Water and sewer application X Adjoining property owners I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or eontrset purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner. Owner s Signature orney S nterprises, and Risinq Star Sports & Adventure Camp .. _ ~ .. Rising Star Sports & Adventure Camp has been in operation for approximately two years. During that period of time, the operation of the facility has been subject to challenge through the court system. While the Circuit Court of the County of Roanoke has concluded that the after- school operation is operated within the provisions of law, the Court further held that the developmental team camps operated in the evenings and weekends did not meet the requirements of law because of a lack of instruction from the operators. Rising Star Sports & Adventure Camp is desirous of securing the special use permits for both a day care center and a camp in order to clarify all of the points in question and, further, to set the guidelines for operation of its facilities. While the after-school program is operated in accordance with the provisions of law, your Petitioners desire to secure a special use permit for the day care facility so as to eliminate questions in the future. The permit would contain specific guidelines for operation of the day care center as contained in the conditions submitted with the application. The day care center would provide for apre-school day care center to be operated from 8:00 AlVI until after lunch and, then, anafter-school program as presently conducted. While the present enrollment is approximately 100, Rising Star would like to secure a permit for an enrollment of 200 for its day care facility. Insofar as the remainder of the programs, Rising Star is incorporating specific instruction within its programs. The instruction will be for the first fifteen minutes of the allotted hour and the remaining time will be utilized through scrimmages where the instructors will continue in the role of officials. Rising Star would like to secure a special use permit for the camp to specifically outline its methods of operations. The permit is being sought for the developmental team camps which would operate in the evenings and the weekends and would allow for a limited number of weekend tournaments with out-of--town teams. All of the operations would be conducted specifically by Rising Star Sports & Adventure Camp. All of Rising Star's criteria for the day care facility and their operation of the camp are set forth on Exhibit 1 attached hereto. Representatives of Rising Star met with a representative of the Civic League and presented this scope of activities to the Civic League. The Civic League responded with the items set forth on Exhibit 2. Rising Star specifically requests that special use permits be granted for a day care operation and for a camp under the existing County guidelines. G:\Users\CBaumgardner\ZONING\Rising Star JUSTIFICATION.doc ~-'! .," ~ STAFF REPORT PART I PETITION: Special Use Permit Requests FILE NO.: 33-11 /2000 C&H Enterprises and Rising Stars Sports Camp; Daycare And Camp PREPARED BY: Terrance Harrington DATE PREPARED: October 27, 2000 A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Rising Stars Sports Camp has been located on this site since 1998. In July of 2000 the Roanoke County Circuit Court found that some of the activities operated by Rising Stars were a violation of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance. The requested Special Use Permits for a Camp and Day Care Center will, if approved by the Board of Supervisors, allow Rising Stars to continue their current operations, and define and allow the expansion of some of their programs. The property is in a Rural Preserve Land Use area. Outdoor recreation uses are generally seen as compatible with Rural Preserve areas. Operating policies and conditions have been submitted, that if accepted, will restrict the scale and scope of activities on the property. B. DESCRIPTION This is a request of C & H Enterprises (Christopher Pollock) and Rising Stars Sports Camp for a Special Use Permit (SUP) to allow the operation of a day care center and sports camp located at 5488 Yellow Mountain Road, in the Cave Spring Magisterial district. The 13.42 acre property is zoned AG-3. Day Care Centers and Camps are permitted by special use in this zoning district. C. BACKGROUND In 1997 Camps were permitted by-right in AG-3 zoning districts. Mr. Christopher Pollock approached Roanoke County with the idea of owning and operating a sports camp in the county. After discussing with Mr. Pollock the operational characteristics of his proposed business, staff advised Mr. Pollock that his proposed business exceeded the definition of a camp. We advised him that he would need a SUP for a day care center, and a SUP for an outdoor gathering in order to operate the camp in accordance with his business plan and local zoning. Petition: 1 File No.: G~ °° ~ 3, Mr. Pollock applied for these permits in the Summer of 1997. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the permits in August of 1997, The Board of Supervisors denied the permits on August 19`h Mr. Pollock thereafter met with the zoning administrator to discuss the allowable scope of activities that could occur by-right under the camp definition. Through a series of letters to Mr. Pollock, the zoning administrator defined allowable camp activities by-right. Mr. Pollock thereafter developed the property as a sports camp. Current facilities include a field house, several outdoor athletic fields, and a parking area. After opening, the staff began to receive complaints from surrounding property owners that the property was being used for activities unrelated to a camp. Specifically, the property was being used for organized sport leagues, outdoor tournaments, and as a practice facility for semi-professional indoor football and soccer teams. In addition, the county received complaints that the property was being used for an after school and summer day care center even though the Board had denied a day care permit for this use. Finally, complaints were received about noise, trespassing, and minor property destruction on adjoining properties. The alleged zoning violations that were verified were litigated in the Summer of 2000. The court found that the outdoor tournaments and practice sessions violated the zoning ordinance, and ordered that these activities be stopped. The court also found that the county's two definitions of day care and camp contained sufficient similarities to conclude that the after school and summer day camp activities could continue to occur as a permissible camp. Finally the court ruled that the "developmental team camps" held in the evening were not permissible under the definition of a camp as the emphasis of these activities was on game/league play and not instructional activities. The current applications are for the purpose of clarifying the court order, and reestablishing Mr. Pollock's right to hold tournaments. If approved, the camp SUP will authorize the scope and operational characteristics of the evening developmental team camps and the weekend tournament activities. The day care SUP will, if approved, validate the court ruling that the day care activities are permitted, and allow a future expansion of this use. Mr. Pollock is not requesting approval to allow semi-professional team practices/events on his property. D. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS 1. Day Care Centers and Camps are allowable uses by Special Use in AG-3 districts. As part of a SUP evaluation, the Commission may recommend, Petition: 2 File No.: .'"' and the Board may attach any conditions to the SUP that relate to the use and development of the property. 2. Site plans were approved in 1998 for the existing development on the property. Approval of revised plans will be necessary if additional facilities are constructed on the site. Petition: 3 File No.: ~,. ~,, ." PART I I A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS The property is currently developed as a sports recreation facility and includes a field house and outdoor athletic fields. After school programs are offered during this time of the year. The field house continues to be used for these programs and other activities not prohibited by the courts. Vegetation has been cleared for the field house, parking areas and playing field, but the remainder of the property remains wooded. Access to the property is from Yellow Mountain Road. This access was approved by VDOT in 1998 and is the only point of access envisioned by the applicant. The property is located in an area characterized by large lot and scattered residential home sites. Mr. Pollock owns additional property to the east and south of the facility. Properties owned by the Dean and Overstreet families are to the north and west (respectively) of the property. It is these two families that have experienced the most/most direct neighborhood impact from the facility. B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT/USE Mr. Pollock's 1997 SUP request included a conceptual development plan for the property. To the extent that the property has been developed over the past three years, it has been developed in accordance with this plan. The existing field house, parking lots, access drive and athletic fields are located as shown on the plan. This plan has been resubmitted as part of this current special use proposal. Undeveloped portions include several outdoor basketball courts, additional parking areas, a swimming pool, and approximately seven cabins for overnight camping. The submitted application includes an operation plan that addresses existing and proposed activities. These activities include the day care programs, the summer camp programs, the developmental team camps, the single function clinics, and the weekend tournaments. For each activity, Mr. Pollock has provided information on the scope and scale of the activity. Specific issues addressed include items such as number of participants, hours of operation, registration procedures, and frequency of events per year. In addition Mr. Pollock has made proposals to prohibit field lighting and outdoor speakers. Petition: 4 File No.: ~~ Mr. Pollock has been meeting with a group of neighborhood residents to present his proposal and solicit their comments on how his application could possibly be modified to address neighborhood concerns. The neighbors have offered their ideas on the appropriate nature and scale of activities that should be allowed at Rising Stars if approved by the Board The resident proposals were also included in Mr. Pollock's application materials. At the time of application, there was not a consensus between the neighbors and Mr. Pollock on the desired operating characteristics of the facilities. Mr. Pollock is continuing to meet with the residents, and staff expects that a revised proposal will be available for the Commission to consider at your meeting on November 7th Mr. Pollock's proposals and submitted concept plan can be used by the Commission as a basis for possible conditions to attached to any SUP recommended for approval. C. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY COMMUNITY PLAN The property is located in a Rural Preserve Future Land Use area. Rural preserve areas are mostly outlying areas that require a high degree of protection to preserve forestal, recreational, and remote rural residential areas. In additional to agricultural uses, the plan recommends that rural preserve areas be devoted to uses such as parks and outdoor recreation facilities, as a strategy to protect lands from more intensive residential uses. The plan also states that rural preserve areas are suitable for rural institutional uses such as churches and clubs serving local population bases. The existing and proposed facilities are generally recreational in character. Although the property is heavily used during periods of peak operation, the recreational activities on the property are generally less intensive that activities associated with residential development of the property. The day care activities are probably the most intensive use of the property on a daily basis. Generally day care centers serve a local population base, providing services to nearby residents. Petition: 5 File No.: PART III STAFF CONCLUSIONS A. Conformance with Plan Staff believes that this proposal generally conforms to Community Plan policies that address the appropriate use of property in rural preserve areas. Rising Stars provides indoor and outdoor recreational opportunities for Roanoke area residents. Although the field house is at the center of indoor activities that take place on the property, most of the 13 acre site is vacant or developed as recreational fields consistent with Plan policies. B. Impact on Community Over the past three years, the impacts of the facility on the community have been largely in the areas of traffic, noise, hours of operation, and the nature of activities that have taken place on site, i.e., professional team practices. Adjacent property owners have also had to address apparent trespassing and minor vandalism issues as farm fences have been damaged in attempts to retrieve balls that have been accidentally kicked/thrown off-site. The continued prohibition of practice by the semi-professional teams, and the limitation of tournament play will address some of the historic concerns. Using the SUP to define items such as allowable activities and hours of operation, number of participants, lighting, etc will establish a clear standard for the operation and management of the facility. Some items, suggested by the residents, such as screening and fencing along adjacent property lines seem clearly justifiable and necessary to insure that adjacent properties are respected. C. Recommendations Staff believes that the issuance of the requested permits is appropriate. Final conditions to attach to the permits should be discussed by the Commission at your meeting on Tuesday November 7th. The continuing discussions between Mr. Pollock and the community will hopefully result in a set of operation conditions and policies that address neighborhood concerns and allow the continued operation of the facility in accordance with local zoning. Petition: 6 File No.: AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2000 ORDINANCE GRANTING SPECIAL USE PERMITS TO C&H ENTERPRISES, L.L.C. AND RISING STAR SPORTS & ADVENTURE CAMP TO OPERATE A CAMP AND A DAY CARE CENTER TO BE LOCATED AT 5488 YELLOW MOUNTAIN ROAD (TAX MAP N0.99.00-2-6.2), CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, C&H Enterprises, L.L.C. and Rising Star Sports & Adventure Camp have filed petitions for special use permits to operate a camp and a day care to be located at 5488 Yellow Mountain Road (Tax Map No. 99.00-2-6.2) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on November 7, 2000; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on October 24, 2000; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on November 14, 2000. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of special use permits to C&H Enterprises, L.L.C. and Rising Star Sports & Adventure Camp to operate a camp and a day care to be located at 5488 Yellow Mountain Road (Tax Map No.99.00-2-6.2) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 2000 Community Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.2-2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved with the following conditions: (1) Day Program A. The After School Day Program will operate following the schedule of the Roanoke Area School Calendars. One hundred and fifty (150) campers shall be allowed. Two- hundred (200) campers shall be allowed beginning in September 2002, excluding half-day campers. B. The morning half-day program will be as follows: U:\WPDOCS\AGENDAIZONING\c&h.rising.star.sup.wpd ~ u-3 -There shall be a maximum of 25 children, 3.5 to 5 years old. -The program shall operate two days per week, 9:30am to 12:30pm. -The program will operate following the schedule of the Roanoke Area School Calendars. C. The program shall maintain a state day care license. (2) Summer Camps A. The program will operate following the schedule of the Roanoke Area School Calendars. One hundred and fifty (150) campers shall be allowed. Two-hundred (200) campers shall be allowed beginning in June 2002, including half-day campers. (3) Developmental Team Camps A. The camps will operate 6:OOpm to 9:OOpm Monday thru Friday. The gate will close at 9:30 pm, except during indoor soccer season, (November 15 -February 15) when operating hours will be to 10:00pm and the gate shall close at 10:30pm. B. Saturday hours shall be from 9:OOam to 9:OOpm.. (Gate shall close at 9:30pm). C. Sunday hours shall be 1:OOpm to 6:OOpm except during indoor soccer season (November 15 -February 15) when operating hours shall be until 9:OOpm (Gate shall close at 9:30pm). D. All camps shall be run by Rising Star staff. E. All camp enrollments shall be individual. All instruction shall be given by Rising Star staff. (4) Single Function Clinics A. Single function clinics of up to a maximum of four (4) hours would be permitted during operating hours. (5) Weekend Tournaments U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\ZONING\c&h.rising.star.sup.wpd 2 ~-3 A. No more than 8 outdoor (3 Fall, 3 Spring, 2 Summer) and 16 indoor tournaments shall be held during any calendar year. All tournaments (except Commonwealth Games) shall be sponsored and operated by Rising Star. B. No more than 20 teams shall participate in any indoor tournament. No more than 10 teams shall participate in any outdoor tournament. C. Pre-registration, with Rising Star, shall be required for all tournament teams. D. Tournaments could be held on Friday evening, Saturday, and Sunday during normal operating hours as set above, except that Sunday tournaments can be held between the hours of 10:00am and 6:OOpm. E. Abutting property owners shall be notified in writing one week in advance of all tournaments. (6) Operations A. Lighting shall not be provided for any outdoor field, court or other athletic area. B. There shall be no loud speakers or other sound amplification device used on Rising Star property. C. Rising Star shall not allow or encourage the parking of any vehicle associated with Rising Star on Yellow Mountain Road. This parking prohibition shall be publicized in Rising Star publications and newsletters. D. No alcoholic beverages shall be allowed on the property. E. No outside vendors shall be allowed on Rising Star property. F. No professional orsemi-professional sports teams shall be allowed to play or practice at Rising Star. (7) Holiday Closings U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\ZONING\c&h.rising.star.sup.wpd 3 L.~ -3 A. Rising Star shall be closed on the following holidays: New Year's Day, Easter, Memorial Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Eve, Christmas Day. (8) Activity Supervision A. Rising Star's personnel shall be present in a supervisory role at the site at all times. (9) Physical DeveloRment A. The site shall be developed generally in accord with a concept plan entitled "Concept Plan, Pollock Soccer Camp, Yellow Mountain Road, Prepared by Lang Engineering, and dated June 19, 1997. B. A 4-foot high chain link fence shall be installed on the property line along the entire length ofthe two athletic fields, where these fields adjoin Roanoke County Tax Parcel 98.04-1-23, said parcel currently owned by Donald Dean. The fence will be installed by August 2001. C. A maximum of 12, 6-foot tall pine trees shall be planted and maintained, and evenly spaced along the mutual property line of Darlene Overstreet (98.04-1-21.1), where said property line abuts the athletic field. The trees shall be planted by August 2001. D. Rising Star will install and maintain a marker ribbon 200 feet from the property line of Clovis Hartman (Tax Parcels 99.00-2-13, 14, and 15). Children shall not be allowed within this 200 foot boundary. 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. U:\WPDOCSIAGENDA\ZONING\c&h.rising.star.sup.wpd 4 U- 3 The Yellow Mt. Road Citizens Committee was formed to voice their concerns of The Rising Star Sports Camp and its impact on our community. The committee consisted of residents along Yellow Mt. Rd. and property owners around Rising Star Sports Camp, this included one from Bandy Road. What we have done? We have met together as a committee and Received the first proposal from Mr. Pollock. The Committee submitted a counter- proposal to Mr. Pollock. After returning the counter-proposal to Mr. Pollock from the Citizen's Committee we received a second proposal from Mr. Pollock. Deb Smith who lives in front of the Sports Camp and 1 met with Mr. Pollock and refined the second proposal for distribution to the committee. Mr. Pollock met with the citizens who wished to or could attend and presented the third proposal. After minor adjustments you have before you The Special Use Conditions that the citizens and Mr. Pollock have through many hours of discussion resulted in what we feel are cooperative efforts on all parties. Upon these negotiations it is recommended by the committee members that the revised proposals or conditions be submitted with the special use permits and approval granted. An item has arisen since these negotiations in which the committee received one letter dated November 8~' and one memorandum dated November 9~` through myself from Dr. Nickens that he will advocate the use of Rising Star for the Roanoke Steam, a professional arena football team, to practice from approximately January through August. This reflects 29-36 sessions during this period. Also, Dr. Nicken's stated that the uniqueness of the Rising Star facility would be appropriate for Roanoke Steam, but disallow other professional team use. Item 6 F. of the Special Use Permit Conditions states "No professional or semi- professional sports teams shall be allowed to play or practice at Rising Star." oke . The citizens and Mr. Pollock agreed upon this condition. w ' I would also like to reference the Court Decree from Roanoke County Circuit Court between Roanoke County and Rising Star dated Ai.igust 31, 2000 stating: OUOTE: "That the Respondents, their agents and employees 'ae, the hereby are, permanently enjoined and restrained from permitting or allowing practices, scrimmages, or games of the Roanoke Wrath, Roanoke Steam, lacrosse teams or such similar professional or amatuer sports organizations, and any other group or individuals not registered at a Rising Star camp or clinic on or at the property that this is the subject of these proceedings." UNQUOTE Since it was stated clearly in the court order, the citizens felt an importance to also include this item in the "Special Use Permit Conditions." After meeting again Sunday, November 12, 2000 the citizens discussed the latest proposal from Dr. Nickens. It is with reluctance the committee agrees approval for the restricted use for Roanoke Steam. We recognize the commitment Dr. Nickens has made to our community and the committee felt a negative response would erode continued support. Therefore we would like to add the following conditions for Roanoke Steam practices: 1. No other team would be allowed to practice at Rising Star because of the uniqueness according to Dr. Nickens. 2. There would be no alcohol or profanity allowed. 3. No loud speakers permitted. 4. No buses would be allowed for transportation of the Roanoke Steam. 5. Use of the Rising Star facility would be within the operating hours of 9:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. 6. This would be one season limit for year 2001 only. We request that any infractions or violations of the above conditions will result in immediate suspension of the agreement to allow Roanoke Steam use of Rising Star facility. We further realize that Roanoke County will be expected to address each complaint and take action accordingly in an expedient manner. O~ ROAN ~~` ~ , ,, z ' c~ ~ 2 o a rasa AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ - 3 APPEARANCE REQUEST '~~PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~ I S '-`~ ~ ~ ~ ;~ i ~ Z_ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: r- ~ ) k, Iv ~C l ~ /~ i I " ~. ,~ ADDRESS: ,~~ ~f ±~~ L r ~ L ~~ ~ ~ L r~ ;'v ~~ i "I ~ ~ C _~ ~. f} ti -{ _-- PHONE: r ~~\ ~ ~5 ~% O~ Q,OANO~~` ~, ', 9 Z G7 ~ 2 o r, a 1838 AGENDA ITEM NO. APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS ,. _ ~ SUBJECT: ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~-~ ~ '~~~U I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/IVES L/STED BELOW; ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the, majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. . ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD ~~ i NAME: C~ ~. ~-~ ~- ~; ~:~``~ / y i `` In ~ -J ADDRESS: .~ ~ :~ :~ ~, ~.,~ ~ ~ s~1 ~~ -~'C~J~-- .~`'~~~ PHONE: ~ ~~ °Z ~ ~ C''~' C~ POANO,YF` l/ ~ h ti ~ 2 o~ AGENDA ITEM NO. '> raas APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE ~ CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: '~:~ r~~~~ ,~ ~;.~ r'' ~,C~',_~~L( i;'~~ ~~~-;~ ~ f~ ..~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD II NAME: ~~-4~ ~ f~~ ~ T-~~-- ADDRESS: .~~ la zJe ll~ ~~~ 1111`- /~J~ S l= . PHONE: C/ ~ % -- ~ ~ 7 ~ ~~ ~OANO,~~G ~ .~ ~' 9 Z - G) o Z J ,, a 1838 AGENDA ITEM NO. ~' ~ APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE X CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: R`si r~s ~ ~ v~.-b Mr e, I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW; ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: eke, ~ ~gv ADDRESS: 56 S b PHONE: ~8~ - 8~ S 6 ~OANp,~~ ~ ,N Z c~ o Z v a 183a AGENDA ITEM NO. ~-/~ APPEARANCE REQUEST V PUBLIC NEARING -ORDINANCE _ CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: 4~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW; ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRI ADDRESS:~~ClS ~~C.,~°lJr~.. TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD ~/ PHONE: O~ QOANO~FG ti,, 9 Z c~ ~ i o a :~ 1838 AGENDA ITEM NO. APPEARANCE REQUEST `PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW; ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue; and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. . ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: I~~~ h~ Z ~~ ~I~.~-/° S ADDRESS: ~ ~ `~ ( ~-vi.°~~~ ~~f~ ~~~Zc.L c.-~ ~ ~~-F-~t- ~~~ ~:c.~ PHONE: ~~ ~ _. r-D O~ Et0AN0,~~` ~, 9 c~ ~ 2 o: a 1838 AGENDA ITEM NO. - APPEARANCE REQUEST /~ PUBLIC NEARING -ORDINANCE _ CITIZEN COMMENTS -t- SUBJECT: ~c? U~~~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW; ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group sha11 file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~,V,,~ t 11 ~C.~Cac ~ -~ ,_ _ ADDRESS: ~~~ ~1 ~~~~>>~.... ~ ~~~ ~'`~C~w ~~" PHONE: ~~~ 1"~'JL~~Z~ ^~ `.. ~'~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2000 ORDINANCE 111400-9 AMENDING ORDINANCE 011299-6, "ROANOKE COUNTY COMMUNITY PLAN" -ADOPTION OF A NEW FUTURE LAND USE MAP FOR THE COLONIAL AVENUE CORRIDOR, AND THE INCORPORATION OF DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR THIS AREA WHEREAS, by Ordinance 011299-6 the Board of Supervisors adopted the "Community Plan for Roanoke County, Virginia;" and WHEREAS, at the request of the Board a comprehensive study of the Colonial Avenue Corridor was completed in 1999; and WHEREAS, at community meetings held on September 21 and October 4, 2000, the citizen-based Colonial Avenue Alliance reviewed and voiced support for the proposed revisions to the future land use map and the proposed development and design guidelines; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has prepared amendments to the Community Plan for Roanoke County for the Colonial Avenue corridor area; and WHEREAS, a Planning Commission Public Hearing on the proposed amendments was held after advertisement and notice as required by Section 15.2-2204 of the Code of Virginia, on July 5, 2000; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on October 24, 2000, and the second reading and public hearing was held on November14, 2000. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Ordinance 011299-6 adopting the "Roanoke County Community Plan" dated September 30, 1998, is hereby amended to include the following: (A) Colonial Avenue Corridor Future Land Use Proposed map revisions as shown on a map prepared by Roanoke County Department of Community Developed dated December 22, 1999, said map is attached hereto as part of the "Colonial Avenue Corridor Study" dated December, 1999 -Attachment A. ACTION NO. ITEM NO. °`° "~"~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGII~TIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMII~TISTRATION CENTER MF.F.TIN DA .: November 14, 2000 AGENDA ITEM: Public hearing and second reading of ordinance amending Ordinance 011299- 6, "Roanoke County Community Plan" for adoption of a revised future land use map and design guidelines for the Colonial Avenue Corridor. C'OLTNTY ADMTNT TRATOR' C'OMM N 4: BA K RO Beginning in early 1999, staff undertook a comprehensive study of the Colonial Avenue Corridor at the request of the Board of Supervisors. As mapped, the corridor encompasses some 983 land parcels on 1,098 acres. Detailed analyses of existing land use and zoning, property valuation and housing, public water and sewer, drainage, transportation and community participation were compiled into the Draft Colonial Avenue Corridor Study completed in December 1999. At the Planning Commission's direction, staff then developed a range of special corridor design guidelines under a mixed use concept of existing residential and well-designed, carefully located commercial projects recognizing neighborhood sensitivity and compatibility. These design guidelines, recommending preservation of the overall residential character of the corridor through appropriate site layout (particularly parking and street access), architectural treatment, landscaping, lighting and signage relative to development or redevelopment proposals were approved by the Planning Commission on July 5, 2000. Also at that time, the Commission reviewed and approved proposed revisions to the future land use map. Those appear in the draft study titled "Alternative II Proposed Future Land Use" which includes additional Transition designated properties along the north side of Colonial Avenue. The citizen-based Colonial Avenue Alliance reviewed and voiced support for the proposed revisions to the future land use map and proposed design guidelines at community meetings held on September 21 and October 4, 2000. The draft corridor study, recommended revisions to the future land use map and proposed design guidelines are attached. u-~-/ A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2000 ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 011299-6, "ROANOKE COUNTY COMMUNITY PLAN" -ADOPTION OF A NEW FUTURE LAND USE MAP FOR THE COLONIAL AVENUE CORRIDOR, AND THE INCORPORATION OF DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR THIS AREA WHEREAS, by Ordinance 011299-6 the Board of Supervisors adopted the "Community Plan for Roanoke County, Virginia;" and WHEREAS, at the request of the Board a comprehensive study of the Colonial Avenue Corridor was completed in 1999; and WHEREAS, at community meetings held on September 21 and October 4, 2000, the citizen-based Colonial Avenue Alliance reviewed and voiced support for the proposed revisions to the future land use map and the proposed development and design guidelines; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has prepared amendments to the Community Plan for Roanoke County for the Colonial Avenue corridor area; and WHEREAS, a Planning Commission Public Hearing on the proposed amendments was held after advertisement and notice as required by Section 15.2-2204 of the Code of Virginia, on July 5, 2000; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on October 24, 2000, and the second reading and public hearing was held on Novemberl4, 2000. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Ordinance 011299-6 adopting the "Roanoke County Community Plan" dated September 30, 1998, is hereby amended to include the following: (A) Colonial Avenue Corridor Future Land Use Proposed map revisions as shown on a map prepared by Roanoke County Department of Community Developed dated December 22, 1999, said map is attached hereto as part of the "Colonial Avenue Corridor Study" dated December, 1999 - Attachment A. (B) The adoption of text amendments entitled "Colonial Avenue Corridor Study" dated December, 1999, attached hereto as Attachment A. 2. That the effective date of this Ordinance is November 14, 2000. G:\ATTORNEY\PMM W GENDA\comm.plann.colonial.ave.wpd O~ ~t0AN0,~F` ~, ,_~ o a AGENDA ITEM NO. y J .r, 1838 APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~h. ~l ~ v~ . I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW; ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements andlor comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD II NAME: S , ~a <~. ~ t tL ~ ADDRESS: ~ ~ V6 ~.° l ~ k~,a ~ I~ ~e PHONE: ~ 76 ~ ~ ~ u-~ DRAFT COLONIAL AVENUE CORRIDOR STUDY DECEMBER, 1999 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Roanoke County Department of Community Development, Planning Division would like to thank the following for assistance in the preparation of this study: Roanoke Valley - Alleghany Regional Commission Roanoke County Department of Community Development, Geographic Information Systems and Engineering Divisions Participants in the August, 1999 Colonial Avenue Corridor Citizens Meeting and Survey Roanoke County Planning Commission: Martha Hooker, Chair Kyle Robinson Todd Ross Al Thomason Don Witt COLONIAL AVENUE CORRIDOR STUDY Contents P a g e I INTRODUCTION & SCOPE 1 Corridor boundary map & narrative II PURPOSES 2 Land Use Transportation Environmental Quality Neighborhood Issues Site Planning/LTrban Design III ANALYSIS 3 Corridor Borders - boundary determinations including property and aerial mapping Existing Land Use - discussion by use group with redevelopment "alternative potential" - field survey listing and Existing Land Use map Existing Zoning -narrative with corridor zoning district table g - statistical graphics with written description 9 - corridor zoning map 11 -Table of Zoning Actions (history) 12 Property Valuation & Housing -narrative of land and building ownership and history 13 -valuation and building graphics 15 Public Water & Sewer -narrative of conditions 1 g -service maps 1 g Stormwater/Drainage -description of conditions and maintenance projects in the comdor 1 g -topographic map indicating recent drainage improvements 21 Site Planning/LTrban Design -narrative with graphics for architecture, parking, 2 2 landscaping, signage & exterior lighting Transportation -narrative including existing conditions inventory, traffic data, congested 2 7 areas, select intersection analysis & access management, potential improvements Community Participation -discussion of public meeting, survey results and graphics 3 7 IV GUIDELINES 5 5 Future Land Use -discussion of potential future corridor uses with implementation strategies and proposed future land use map 5 6 COLONIAL AVENUE CORRIDOR STUDY I INTRODUCTION & SCOPE The existence of Colonial Avenue dates back to the early 1900's when it was known as Poor House Road reflecting its link to the then regional facility for the poor at present-day Virginia Western Community College. Until the mid-1960's, the only businesses along Roanoke County's 2.2 mile stretch of Colonial Avenue were Corner's Store - a general store/gas station at the corner of Colonial and Thompsons Lane and Lester's Garage at the Colonial/Brambleton Avenue intersection. By the mid-to-late 60's, Corner's Store had become a Shell service station and a new 7-Eleven convenience store was built adjacent to the service station. Also, by this time nearly all single family homes actually fronting on Colonial Avenue had been constructed. At the corridor's western tip, aMick-or-Mack grocery was developed circa 1970. The construction of four-lane VA 419 in the early 1970's ended a large farm operation and created a major highway intersection unlike anything corridor residents had known. During the 1970's, the first residence-to-office conversion occurred at the 419 intersection, the Colonial Green Office Park was developed and dentists offices were built adjacent to the 7-Eleven. One or two residence-to-office conversions occurred just east of the Mick-or-Mack store, also in the 70's. In 1983-1984, the corridor's first shopping center ,Promenade Park, was constructed southeast of Colonial Avenue and 419 -partly as a result of traffic on Electric Road at the time. Other than the emergence of Harris Teeter at the previous Mick-or-Mack site, new commercial activities had not occurred in the corridor for approximately 15 years until the Harrell/Paychecks Plus redevelopment project began in early 1999. During the County's visioning process, citizens identified five key themes from which to help mold the future. Those themes are regionalism, sustainability, scenic beauty and two others of great significance to neighborhoods -community identity and quality of life. Quoting the newly adopted Community Plan, "Roanoke County citizens identify very closely with their neighborhoods and school districts. Efforts must be made to preserve the elements of community identity that provide gathering places for the exchange of information and support. The citizens recognize that there exists a fragile balance between economic growth and prosperity and the preservation of a way of life that is cherished by many. Proactive steps must be taken to manage growth in a positive way - to act conservatively and with deliberation when making decisions that will affect our high quality of life and that of our children's children." Recent increases in traffic and accompanying development pressure have brought uncertainty to Colonial Avenue and its predominantly residential character. This study will provide a framework for protecting existing land uses from the disruptive impacts of change wherever possible and for avoiding development or conversion/redevelopment having a significantly different density, size, height or scale. The study area encompasses only land lying within County boundaries although plans addressing Roanoke City's portion of Colonial Avenue will be explored. The study's 2.2 mile length begins at the Colonial/Brambleton Avenue intersection, travels northeast through mostly developed single family residential neighborhoods to the Route 419 intersection and continues eastward through single and multi-family residential areas until reaching the city limits 0.4 mile northeast of Ogden Road. II PURPOSES Land use, transportation, environmental quality, neighborhood issues and site planning/urban design have been identified as the most important elements influencing the future of the Colonial Avenue comdor. Purposes of the corridor study are determined by analyzing existing conditions related to each of these elements and combining these analyses with the concerns of local officials and citizens. These purposes serve as a guide for future conservation, development, or redevelopment in the corridor. Land Use - Preserve established residential neighborhoods and protect them from encroachment by conflicting land uses while allowing properly designed infill development. - Require that all development or redevelopment preserves or creates open space. - Apply Community Plan design guidelines to all development or redevelopment. - Discourage development where public service expenses exceed revenue generated. Transportation - Maintain a safe and efficient flow of traffic throughout the corridor. - Establish desired traffic patterns, parking connectivity and design standards for buildings and landscaping at those sites where development or redevelopment may be appropriate; limit access points to ensure safety and facilitate movement. - Ensure that road improvements are sensitive to existing land use/environmental conditions and that such improvements occur with maximum citizen input. - Provide for alternative modes of transportation around neighborhoods such as walking and bicycling including greenway/bikeway construction. - Explore the feasibility of expanding transit service through the Colonial corridor. Environmental Quality - Identify natural areas that limit development (such as floodplains, steep slopes and mature woodlands) and maintain them as conservation areas. - Preserve all remaining natural scenic features. - Properly manage stormwater runoff, especially on frontage properties. Neighborhood Issues - Protect the uniqueness and special characteristics of the Colonial Avenue corridor - Preserve the high quality of life, sense of place, and authenticity residents of the corridor enjoy by maintaining the institutions and natural, cultural and historic features that define this community. Site Planning/LTrban Design - Increase the compatibility of conflicting land uses through effective screening and buffering and building orientation/architectural scale where possible. - Maintain and enhance the visual quality of development and redevelopment. J '' III ANALYSIS CORRIDOR BORDERS After a thorough review of available mapping, Community Development staff selected topography and the local street network closely linked to Colonial Avenue as the two most important factors influencing boundary determinations for this study. In this respect, staff delineated a small study area focusing unilaterally on Colonial Avenue, an arterial highway in its own right, and attempted to de-emphasize its connections to U.S. 221 and VA 419. In the vast majority of cases, parcels lying within corridor boundaries intersect Colonial Avenue (VA 720) directly or are connected to it by an exclusive network of subdivision or "local" streets. Topographically, much of the study area's northern limit coincides with natural ridgelines which parallel Colonial Avenue to a depth of 1,000 feet to 1,500 feet from the road. The corridor's southern boundary generally follows Murray Run east of VA 419 and natural ' ridgelines and Belle Meade Drive (which parallels Colonial Avenue) at depths varying from 700 feet to 2,200 feet. Western study limits are formed by Brambleton Avenue ' (U.S. 221) and the eastern border coincides with Roanoke City Limits at Ogden Hills. Property and aerial mapping depicted on the next two pages indicate corridor boundaries and provide a birdseye view of the nearly 1,000 parcels of land comprising the Colonial ' Avenue Corridor. ' EXISTING LAND USE ' Among the variety of uses for land within the corridor are single and multi-family residential (including condominiums), institutional (both public and private), office and retail commercial and open or undeveloped. Single family residential is the dominant use ' except at intersections with U.S. 221, Route 419 and Ogden Road where retail business, office and retail commercial and multi-family residential are the controlling uses, respectively. Of the 983 total parcels of land within the corridor, 118 front on Colonial ' Avenue including 16 commercial, 6 institutional, 3multi-family residential, 85 single family residential and 8 undeveloped. Although institutional and multi-family residential make up only 9 of the 118 total frontage parcels, they account for a ' disproportionately high 147 acres of the approximately 1,098 acres which comprise the entire study area. ' From a commercial standpoint, a key location is the Colonial/Thompsons Lane intersection where a recent residence-to-office conversion was a catalyst for this study. The potential for more such conversions, especially of older single family structures, coupled with long-term rising property values increases the likelihood of new frontage commercial activity. 3 _ _ M\~ ~ .. ,~ -1- ~~ ~ _4. ~\ ~~ ~ U O Q U _ ~ ~ aya ~ ~ ~ W z O ~° ~ ~ ~ ~'~~ ~,.op, ro T a ° j H ' 0.i- ~¢~ o a ~,_a U _ ,. U c~> m y~ ~+ ° a~a°°~~~°°~ ~z~a~ ~o x ~c~ ~ _S. r. ~~ / ~ v'`r~ ~ \\„ J ~ ~' ~ / ~i ~\ ~ ° ~,\J ~y ~ .% r ~' (~~ , t -4- -~ /~V~ ~~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~,~ ~ ~ J w o t F\ v q~~ ~\ CT W 7 ~\ ~/,./``/ ~~ ~ , ~~ oA ,~~ ~~ ~ ~~~f ~~ ~~ 1 ~ / ~~rr ~ m ~ ~~~ < ~~ ~ c .i r ~ ~C~ mom. 1 \ f /~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a( o ~ ,~ ~ ,~ ~. mod, Go' (~~ ~a f9~G 1~; ~ ~~ .-`~_ ~ ~ v l . - ~ ~~~ ~-- ``~\ ~~.~. ~~_ T~-'1.~:~~~\ jam,./, j.\i , \!-_tL 7 ~~I._ j _.' ~1 ~.~__c~C ~ T ~l~`<~ ~ _ '~. ~. f / 4 o~ ~~~~~~ oA ~ (L~T wry;/\ ~ ~I~/' -~i~`f* C~ ~' !~ 1 y ( \ i-1-~ LL ~ 1 ~ W Si i ~~r ~~~ y y <~ ~ / aPk~~~ _l ice- J i - ~ I 1 :: ~~ r ;~~ ~ '~~ lil i ~ ~ a ~. t ~ ~o;~ S ~ ,, 9 I~ EXISTING ZONING Similar to land use acreage, the vast majority of land in the study area is zoned for single family residential (approximately 84%). Of the 8 parcels of undeveloped land fronting on Colonial Avenue, 5 are zoned R-1 Low Density Residential, 2 are zoned R-4 High ' Density Multi-family Residential and 1 is zoned C-1 Office. Colonial Avenue Corridor Zoning District Designations R-1 Low Density Residential R-2 Medium Density Residential R-3 Medium Density Multi-family Residential R-4 High Density Multi-family Residential C-1 Office C-2 General Commercial Only 33 parcels out of 983 total tracts within the studt area are zoned commercial (C-1 or C-2). However, 21 of these parcels directly abut Colonial Avenue. Of the remaining 12 properties, 6 front on VA 419, 4 abut U.S. 221 and 2 adjoin Ogden Road. Number of Parcels per Zoning District R-1: 825 units - R-2: 4 units - R-3: 9 units - R-4: 112 units - C-1: 22 units - C-2: 11 units - 92 parcels front Colonial 1 parcel fronts Colonial 4 parcels front Colonial 1 parcel fronts Colonial 14 parcels front Colonial 6 parcels front Colonial Acreage of Land per Zoning District Throughout Corridor - 1,097.68 Total Acres R-1: R-2: R-3 R-4: C-1: C-2: 794.28 acres (72.36%) 43.68 acres (3.98%) 53.89 acres (4.91%) 134.87 acres (12.29%) 43.58 acres (3.97%) 27.38 acres (2.49%) 8 i~ i~ Number of Properties for Each Zoning District, Colonial Avenue Study Area O R-1 Low Density Residential D R-2 Medium Density Residential ^ R-3 Medium Density Multi-Family Residential O R-4 High Density Multi-Family Residential ^ C-1 Office C-2 General Commercial 9 Acreage of Land for Each Zoning District, Colonial Avenue Study Area 43.58 83.89 43.68 ^ R-1 Low Density Residential ^ R-2 Medium Density Residential ^ R-3 Medium Density Multi-Family Residential ^ R-4 High Density Multi-Family Residential ^ C-1 Office C-2 General Commercial 10 I~ al Avenue corridor zoning Districts \~~ ZONING DISTRICTS ^ AG3 Agricultural/Rural Preserve C1 AGl Agricultural/Rural Low Density E3 .AR Agriculturnl/Reaideniial ^ ,AV V1lllage Center C R1 Law Density R;eaiden~tial G~ R2 Medium Density Residential ^ R3 Medium Density Multi Family ^ R4 High Demaity Multi Family ^ PRD Planned. Reaid.eatinl Development ^ RMH Manufactured Housing Overlay I_i kfC Neighborhood Commercial ^ ~Ci Office Dlatrict ^ C2 General Commercial District ^ PCD Planned. Commercial Development ^ II iraduatr[al District ^ I2 tuduatrial District ^ P@ Planned. industrial Development ^ lEP Ercplore Park ~~ Study Aren Boun~dnry Prepared by the Roanoke Count Department Hof Community Devel No Scale April 5, 1999 . Q U .~ 0 N ~~ ~, O .; C. t/: 4. [~i CO O p c 0 c •~ '~ r ~ c ~ y U ~ b0 C C =_ a r r'~-- ^ C O O O O O O O O L L L L L ~"" L Q C S ~ Cd RS CC Cd C~ Cd RS R ' °c, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' ~ ~ a ~ - 0 ~ ~ ~ y U .~ ~ O bA %~ ~ O ~ .^ ~ ~ ~ s s o- 3 °' ~ ~ O z ~ L .-. .O U ~ Z ~ 4-. O O ~ ~ U ~ O. O ~ ~ • O +~-' w O LL U y L v U L G s0. ~ 4.. Vi ~ ~ CC R CC O L ~"' U ~ r"' U r.+ U U 0011 ~ O 0 ~ om ce ~ L . r L t .. i . ~-' 3 J C V7 C N N ~ O O ~ O O O O U U C U U U ~ U O O O O O O O ~p M ~ N v-~ ~: v-i Q + i ~ [~ O O O O ~ ~ ~ ca c c e 0 0 0 0 0 0 fC C~ CC (~ C~ CC N U ~ ,~ ~ ~ Q\ ~ ~' Q C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~, •~, ~ en c rn c ao c 5n ~ o C by CJ '~ ~ ~ N ~ U ~ U O N ~ V] L c,G 4i ~ w U `' O ' C O 4 O 4 O 4-. O ~, - W -. . ~ C U O O O O ~ U Ti t~ Cd CC ~ C ~ O O O N tP1 ~ ~ [~ ~ ~ ~ M ~-~ +i +I ^' ~'~ r 'U U o Y ,~ N C] 0 ~ ¢ 0 y U a1 0 ., CD 0 W 0 ~ 0 C~ 0 ~C1 0 ~ 0 .~ ~ 0 M ~ 0 ~--' ~ 0 '~ ~, M/ ~ ~ ,.,/ ~ ~~,// Fti ,~~.// ii+ ,~~// FL W CG ~ ~+ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ` cC L R7 Q ., z G' L U ~ b .-. U 3 ~ w C ° G ° ~ ~ ~ on O ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~' ""a v; .~ ~ ~ w ~ cCC U x Q ~ m ~ U ~ ~ O ~ °~ C 0, m ~ _. `~ m .O ~ U ~ c 0 O U ~ ~ v1 L o 3 ti ,~ ~ ro Gl ~ ti ~ ~ ~~ ~v 0 ro 3~ w -~ ~ ~ ¢ ~ .~ m CJ 00 C\ M oo N GO O~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M \ ~ ' C N o c c o N o ~- ~ ~- in c 111 o v '1 0 ~/ ~ 0 c 0 .o U cC bA C .~ O N ~_ t O CD .~ .~ c L a~ 3 -o O U i bD C O N O z v~ 0 ~, GJ s y L U M N .~ O G G. cC C O 'O U o. 0 a~ U b 3 x a a~ U 0 O r~ V ._ 0 O U 12 ' PROPERTY VALUATION & HOUSING I~ , The chart entitled "Building and Land Values, Properties in Colonial Avenue Study Area" illustrates the number of land unit and building unit assessments within specific '~ , price ranges for all parcels within the corridor. These values are markedly higher for commercial and multi-family residential areas. A possible future trend may involve higher values around major intersections currently zoned single family residential where ' accessibility and high visibility to traffic could raise the commercial demand for these parcels. ' The total assessed value (1999) of all Colonial Avenue frontage properties is I $37,899,100. Of this amount, developed office and general commercial values equal $9,686,300 and institutional land and buildings make up $12,690,600 (predominantly ' North Cross School, Colonial Avenue Baptist Church and Colonial Presbyterian Church). Residential values account for $15,522,200 of the total figure. Building Values -All Uses Land Values -All Uses Price Range Quantity Price Range Quantity Under $25,000 - 83 Under $25,000 - 913 $25,000 - $50,000 - 113 $25,000 - $50,000 - 23 $50,000 - $100,000 - 696 $50,000 - $100,000 - 19 $100,000 - $150,000 - 57 $100,000 - $150,000 - 7 $150,000 - $200,000 - 10 $150,000 - $200,000 - 7 $200,000 - $400,000 - 10 $200,000 - $400,000 - 5 $400,000 - $1,000,000 - 1 $400,000 - $1,000,000 - 7 ' Over $1,000,000 - 13 Over $1,000,000 - 2 The corridor's housing stock is aging gracefully. Approximately 82% of all houses in the study area are at least 20 years old. Nearly 60% of all homes in the corridor were built in the 1950's or 1960's. Only approximately 7% of all units have been constructed since 1980. A large majority of homeowners in the study area are relative newcomers (1 - 5 years) or have owned their houses for more than 20 years (an estimated total of 609 units out of 983 corridorwide). Clearly, there is a large recent influx of new homeowners into ' older dwellings in addition to the long-time residents of the area. This is most evident on subdivision lots not directly abutting Colonial Avenue, although frontage houses continue to be purchased by new owners for residential purposes. Over 300 houses in the corridor have been owned/occupied for 5 years or less by their current owners. 13 Age and Quantity of Housing Units Constructed by Decade Percent of Total Housing Units 1940's or Earlier: 109 units - - - - - 11.09% 1950 - 1959: 321 units - - - - - 32.65% 1960 - 1969: 268 units - - - - - 27.26% 1970 - 1979: 219 units - - - - - 22.28% 1980 - 1989: 44 units - - - - - 4.48% 1990 - 1999: 22 units - - - - - 2.24% Current Homeowners Length of Ownership Years Owned Number of Units Percent of Total 1 - 5 304 30.93% 5 - 10 175 17.80% 10 - 20 199 20.24% more than 20 years* 305* 31.03% * data estimated -records incomplete 14 i~uii~ing an~i Lana ~al~as, Prc~~artsas in Cttio~iai Avan~a Study Area 1000 - f 800 - '` 800 - t ~~ . N *' 700 - ,. ~ ` ~ 600 - ~<' 0 500 - f' ~ 400 E . 3 300 _F ~ Z ~, 200 - -"~ - 100 - ~~ 0- I S a N FR N 'O C O o ~ ~ O ~ a V '. ~5 13 ~ ~ ~ ~ _ a°o 7 O o 0 0 2 Building Value ° ~°a o a ~ o a - Price Range ~ ~ °a ~ o ~ Land Value o `n ~ ~ - ~ .- o_ ° o ao ~ 0 0 .- ~ ~ a~ ~» > O 15 Age of Housing Units, Calanial Avenue Study Area 3~0- 16 Lots Classed by Number of Years Current Owner has awned. Colonial Avenue Study Area 20 years or more` ~ 10-20 years 3 O L ~ 5-10 years 1 to 5 years !Number of Units * Data Estimated -Records Incomplete 17 0 100 200 300 400 ' SEWER & WATER SERVICES ' Sanitary sewer and public water are available throughout the corridor or can be accessed as land is developed. Private wells or septic systems make up only a very small percentage of utility services supplied and only in situations involving older buildings. Public water line improvements are planned and/or underway in the Eton Hill and Castle Hills subdivisions. Most existing water lines are adequate for domestic flow (everyday residential use) although some pipelines cannot provide the flow of water needed for fire ' protection. Upgrades have not been made to some residential areas since the 1960'x. Water line sizes are generally less than 6 inches in diameter in subdivisions. ' Portions of the corridor's sanitary sewer system experience wet-weather capacity problems due to infiltration. This intrusion of stormwater runoff into the sewer is normally introduced by pipeline cracks, illegal connections and leaky manhole covers. ' Sewer line diameters range from 8 to 12 inches throughout the study area. Maps on the following pages depict existing utility service areas in the corridor. STORMWATER/DRAINAGE 1 Several localized portions of the study area suffer from drainage problems. Among the affected locations are : 1) the Manassas Drive/Colonial Avenue intersection; 2) the ' northeast corner of the Lanewood Drive/Colonial intersection; 3) Girard Drive near the zero lot line residential development under construction; and 4) a malfunctioning stormwater facility at Cave Sprang Methodist Church. ' The Community Development Department's drainage maintenance program evaluates possible improvement projects based generally on potential for property damage with those sites most likely to receive the most damage receiving a higher priority than minor ' nuisances. In the past few years, channel stabilization and repair have been performed in Green Valleys, adequate storm sewer and channel construction was achieved in Eton Hill, storm sewer improvements occurred on Poplar Drive and smaller drainage improvement projects were completed in the Belle Meade area, off Hazel Drive and between View Avenue and Iredell Avenue. Manassas Drive is scheduled for additional improvements. A topographic and drainage improvement map of the corridor follows the utility maps ' referenced above. 18 f~i ~-~_.;~'pF~- ' ~{{r ~~~ -~~'I..F~ - ~,) j/,~ ~~~-tea • >~_}\`~ • `, ~i ~ ~ ~,, ~` ~~ _. ~/ ~ i'•~i// -~ M. ~ • •/•i'J I ~ I. 4\~~~'~ •- {• ~i3'~". rJ~~ Fl 1 ~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ "''p~// ! f rt ~ \~\ \ ~^, \ ~b~~"~ ~~' • --~ it~ •. ~_- .~i •• (V `~` ~~-~ •'A~ - `•Y ~' if ~ ' \ L ~ ,~k , n / _T. o '"_! ~.. \\• i ,~~ ~',~ ` • • ...-'_r ~ ~~;~ 1 ~ A /-.. ~,-- Jr. ~-r~ r/•`l''~ ~~- \ `.. ~ t ` .~/ O.sl ~._ I~ C f -~, .-.~ try i •~~~~ 4 11 - `~•f ~ r \l~~ ` '• ~ ~ - ~~-~~ ~' ii~,,i! f ~ r f ~. • .~ . - • \• l~,g.~~g. ~ ~. ~ SSa°~ l~ \ to • _ •\ • ~'~ r ) L~`~ `!._ l ~, ' ~~ ~ ~r ~ ~/ ~ f ~,•'~ i /-~.•c ~~,~ . ~~~ v-" ~ i ~ Y ~ ~+, f . S~ .., 'c..._ \ ~ ~ •~ ~ C_~ ~.J \ ~~ /yf J•~ ~~ y}• s/ t ~ f ~ti.i~ ~:• • ,,~c~ PUBLIC SEWER SERVICE ~~;--;~,~ ~~ ~=~. ~ ~'• r'~ ~ L-. r // •', ` • !.' • r a> ~ ,- C OrrlClOr B OL1Ildaly - ; , , ' ~; /,- . ---,_ Sewer Line Locations ;~' ~-~~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~T..~ 1~ ~' I r ~^ Yi./.~~ 5 ~ ~ ~ ; I~~_v!~#Ij, ~•:K~ '~ ~ ~ ~ - ~,- ~ 'Y-~~ ~ ~ T ';~ 6 r 1 ~.~~~. ~t_~~t~~~i ~--~~/r ~~~ ' , \ ~C '~ gyp; ..r _, w pL~, \ } j• ~ / s!+'.`~1 • • • ~ • •1• • • ;li \ ~'a • i ! f /.~ 1 •_ ~ti'•-~_~ ` '~ ~~"~-a-. rP.r ~ r t.-~~~1 1 ~ ~ 1 ~ •_,l ,* i ~*• •••~ ~'~~ if ~ • ^` i f • r r • J , ^ ~y~,,,l• f ~ i • ~! a •~ i r\ •• ~1 ' ~ i I 1 _ , Y~'if j ~ / 8•~•' _•,~~' tea. • •: ~ • -` Y j V R + r ~ 1 ': -~ lL o .l 'r--_~~+-- 1 ` ~ _-- : o.' • ~ \, ~ fit' ~~ -• ~ "~ ~ 111 • . • ~• •~ "`q ~. t. ~ '. (•-''r •• • •/' • / • _ j ~r j ! ~If ~~ ~~ , y r~ it • ~ 1 --- ~-_.•- • I •, •, i '\ i ~• -• .~~ • ~ y ~ •__`\`~~ ` ~ .. ~ Y ~. -.'•~ •1 •• O• •• • fit' • ~ ~ ~ r` ` --- rte, (` ~ • .d \ • ~frf\`~/ - L ~4• r r~• n ,` ~~. • \\•• \••.•• j • • • / / • • * tr • • ~~• ~ Gam" ~ • ~ ~ ~; i ~ \.3 / ' Y - t .~ ° • . ~ J___ ~\1 r - \\ 111 a • • - ~_..~r- i ~ • • • //• t L / V , ~ _ • ~ _ ~^ \ ~ r ice' \~ ) • l-.. 1, ~ _ - - ~ ~ ~ r ~ _-~ ,~ l .,__ _ ~~ ' .- ~. ~I, t 1 -"'fit .. • • , ~ 1, _ _ ~~ .~_..-- ~ ~` ~~--~.:ti • • \ ,r, • ••- l ~- i ~ f ! /.-.mar -'-•_ - - R`Y~. i ` ' r~ _ ~ l 8 ''j/~~ ~~.~.^}~ r ~+ a ~C--~= • + 4~ 1' % • 1 t .} ~ ~ ~ • w(~~ ' `~, ~,, r /' • ~. : r ~ ~ . • ^ / / ~. ~- yl~ til . ~ ~ ~_' •~ ~ ~~ - .i r ~t /'"+~ .i 4;y ~/~' I~f ``"Y.\~ \ ` ~ ~ ~/ ~~ / f / ~ ~1•S ~• ~,', .+.•t • / .~%' r!T v ~"..Ac t _ ~ ~ l ~lR•iF'/. L~_Jtl`.~ ~~~I?~~ ~ I ~i ' ~rl~, ~(, ,'/~~ a r i f` f / ^:/~~~"..,r- ~*"-r'-~~'' ~ y`1 O\ 'f~ • • r~/ ..•~ I I f /~/.._\ 1` ( \~\~~~`i~` ~ ~~= • , ~ ~ri ~,v~'r~r lam`/ ~!54 ~W ~ r ~/' ~~...r ~ ' .~,t ~` 4 •'~;~ - r~13 Fi 7 ~ '`~~"~ t- r,, f ° ~ ~}• \1 I ~~n f 1, ~j ~" Jj /j~~`~ ~~'~~-f ~,j~r ~~~k e;.* x.•,~; .! ^-~.__.= ~/~~ \ I ~~~.~' ~.~ ~y ~o` % ~. {1~~( r`,-} 1 1~~~:=~-'-- ~ ~~= i ~ / / .~ ° t~~"~ r•oi.\.. f :_ //.r' ~:w_\~' 1~`1R. ~./ .--~'.~~}'r/1- ;'~-_ ^; ~ ,+ f'~~ ~'" • 'i w r,,;„tih \ ~ / ~ win • •~ ` .'~, !,^--^--~ .~ r~ ~r^- M^r . ~ /~'~ t •. -~ ~ y ~~ y ~1,~ . . -~-~ ~~;i U B_L1C WATLR SLI~V I_C_~ f~~:Ts~ ~~,~, .• . ~ ~• •a ,, -•,~~~; y~»~;,_!Sr` Corridor Boundary .,~ii -; ~.P j~;~ ;, a. .~ ~ ~,.`,'~:r Wa-Ler -LxzZe Locations ,_. _~~f, •~ /, /~ V ~` ~ ~~ J' {. .- I ~' !!~~ `J ~ ~~~ -__~ ) ~-7',r. ~ • r~• •~! •V ~ !i. ~.:._~:i~ ~~( ~ f r -f- .z } s. / J~ J ~ l7 r . i ~~ V 1 ` ~Ra..... 1, (?== •+. r• • 'v •! ~ •cssrM.J \/J , C/' • r J ~ i /~- r • .. •• r •~ r' •~~Ip~ i t._-. \ ~ ~~ ~ t • • ••!'^~~ f• ` i f ~.~ ~ ~! ~ a\ i !' ~ • ~~ ~ ., - _~\~ • ^ '(Y~li• ,~•.1,/ i' ,r '~'._,~^~'i • ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ip • ~" r ••~ •~i~ ° •' ~ ~~• •j ! ••~ ~•' ...• •~ ~ ~~ Attu ~,:-i~\ C ~' qw 1 - '_"~ 1 1~` ~Vr89 ~,,~~ ~ " ~ +~~`'~-ts - J•t '• ~ :~i~' 4-_ / fi t ~~:~.,~ ~ f~ ~f1• .~~ ~'.- --- 1 / 1 '"`'~ r! #~%,- -~ 't • f / Jr• ~ • ~ j d • Jr i` ~~#.rl--i ~~ir ''' f,,i ~~} i••. -~ **'• `-./ ~J O :' 1Y\O~d~I'-~iX'OSS • t ` ~• •••. ^ .'-;• . • • ~'•:y ~/ J-.'\f. !' f-- -- ~ : r \ \ ~ ~ ,.-.. ! ~~ / ~' ,.tea ~. ~ ~' ~ . -.= .' : / r~p r' _.._._ - - • ~~ ' 1y ` ! ~ / ~ "` ~ / ~'`' mfr!" t'+ S: ~ i"_r •.~ /r- ~~ \~ 1 ~ J / 9 ~~-~-%.i'~s ~~ • 1 -.~ ..r-S ~ . f ~~ --fir \ J, fFl ~ t ~ \~\i +._~ '~•rl•.~~~'•~f .~ ~' ~~' ~~'J! \\~ f~ `--~\ff'I j•~~-~"R ~,t*,}: ~ -lF ~~_ „~?'~./~'~".~~ ~~rr'~'~ ~~~~i' ~~11\~~ ~, / ~` `'_..-~7 ` _ _ -~_._ ~' ~ a~+~`~ t ~._._ ~~ ~ "lam / / ~ ~ ~ \ ~ / _ fitt" f !/.r~/: ~ - ` - ,+~" ~• . ^".".,^'-"'J 1 -`- `!~^ f f i~ I* ~ r ' ~ /i -' 1 ` `I ~ //%' ~/~ t~` _ 1 ~ `-j ~ J / M• . it yt t a ~.;.~ .~ t ! . / ~ JR ~. + ~ ,~~` ~ ,,,'r"°-i~/~// / 1/, ,,% ' 1 ~~~ f ~ '~ ~ • T~'r'y,~~,~5~ y • •~~ •• i f/f ~ ~N l ~ ~4• • ~~'W' S (~~"--'+- P ~ ~ v C ~ ~~ '~ 1I ~ Q / ~ l't >~- - ~ ,!'~ A~ ~~ ~ ~ • F i`-i'.~.i ~t ,~~ ~`~ j~'~, ~l~J /`~} f.~!Y-~ + r-~ M'^t A;.. ~ `~ l\}\ ':~K~ ~1..;- 1 t~^':f _ _, ,~ { • ,4 ~ ~ ;~,- ~r ~ ~ ~ ~\_ / fit' ~_.-z''~//" ,! y? ~ _ ~j~ •• • •' %' ='"'~'~~~%~° SLOPE 8L DRAINAGE ' .~ -~ •,•t ~;~ %, ~ ' J A ; -`~`.~-~~• ~~ sl ) ~;~: ~_ ~~ i ~, I Corridor Boundary ....~..~...~ ~. j . , C~ ~/ f ~ -~•,,..- ~ . , `,;,~ ~, ` _~ -j, Recent Improvements • .,~~t~ %,.- . ~~(.r' ~~•~'~ % ,.•,-~•~ ~~;; '{ ~ •., '~~ .i~' _ .~ ;r"`=.y'r~~-__.., rLL~' '/" • f`• i~..Q I•j i /~.~`-~~f f J ~.* ~ ,~~~ ~ - ~~' J ~~ ~.;qj i -L., \ 1 ~ ~ \ / ' •' ~'/~--~~c*• ~t •• ! y!'~ s* - ~ • ^~`, ~ ~~ ~ ,, ~I*~ ' ~•.~ - ~ / i ~-,`1•'`-~` ~`y~ q~''S• w~, ~ r ~ i ~' n • J.' • ri as ~ r ~ I I r o f`- =~Tc ~ 8=~• ,-•~ ~1 +~ ~ •' }I i }a~ a~ • _ {~ 1 f '. • \ { .~:.. ~ 0 -~{,~r~---- ~ I i a i.`- ~~ •• •v ~y • • ,r•!/~i'1• ai + +~ i~r/ ~ a + / \ A~' -y ,~ [._` =~_ ``rYW.. I ~ • ~' , ~~ " .~+-~..~•-! ~s r ~ err + ~I w i a ~ tp r / • ~,~ ~/I ~~r ~~i ~ •S~y~r ~ ~~i •-: _ ~- a a- ~\ 1 • ~ ;\• ~ / ~ ~ ° __. ~ + } •~ •~• • •••• • • ~ ~~' ~ , ~ ~+ ~/ `i f ~ '.~-~ '•7~ ~ • :/ y ~ .. `~ * 2 ~ -.; •' ~~ - • r~• • • • /i • t • / ,/%~ijl ' • /- ~ Lam:.-~ ~ ~ ~ /fr ~ 'J.'~`~, }~ ~ - !~ y.•q~•''yly~',tt • •*y\, p i _ - •. ~ .. •• l • •• • ' ~• • •i f_// h ~ !~ ii ~ r~,t"% •/~1~ , / ,~~ i~l ~ ~`~~1J 1 1\4'l~r+r ~• ~ • ` `\'~ ~,\ + •\ \\\ 1 •1\ • ~• T •j • rf •• • 1 ~ •~ ~/ '~ • ~ J ~ r," / .3 ] ~.r ~ v ';}•---'-'~ 1 + _ - \ a' • tom' i i • _/• ~ ..- i`, ; O ~1: ff ~ ~ ~_ s ? ~~ ~/ ~_- ~ ~ • • -r-• • ..+• ~. ~ i ...--ter-..r"1 ~J '~ 'ti~~ t\ ~.•' ~ ~'h a ~.~~- >! R_- .~,~Y tO~"n+~+#:1~T0:,S . •• •••^ E. • • *'!f i / '-;-'\. y --' 'r\ +y ~ ,/~ i \ ^ • •' • ^ • • . ! '~ ~t J l~r ~;: :~M !'~ ~ r Ct .r~.i Y!i ; ,//~, r ~ '`~ ~+pt ~ ~fj/~~~~- -. / ~ ~ jr .' ~/ sv ,,,.. ~\ ~i_, r7 !! J/Ir--~1 'X~~ ~` / i ~,'`t `+t~ (1,.~-, ~.__ e / , 1 ~~~ i + ~ * % ?~~ ~i '..r j; ~ f~~ \~1~ x/ ~~•~y ~~~,^~` '~ ~~ R~ ~~~ ~ '1 '' ~%y..,~ :"_~'f1r~~J1,/i) ~ I ~ j" 1/ ,~~" ~~ ~ % / ~ //'%j /'ti'- ` Vii- _ `~ .yr: ~ ~ +~ • • -• -~ 1 ~ ~ ~ - ,.f/ r { ~ / ~ (~ I', L (l' } /'~~.."-~-'--•-~. ~ 'i~'"•) ! !' ~ •-~.- !'~. t ~. i'iA~~~ ~ .__ ~/° ;..~~cZ;,~. !:{'`,711.. ~./ .r-' J~ f' //~ i "~~ •; ~/ t / ~ / SITE PLANNING /URBAN DESIGN Historically, site planning has been limited to residential subdivision layout with notable exceptions such as Promenade Park shopping center, Colonial Green offices, Hams Teeter/Kroger, professional offices on Manassas Drive, Carilion Family Medicine, and more recently, Paychecks Plus in the study area. As commercial activity increases, the importance of preserving established neighborhoods and protecting them from conflicting land use encroachment becomes more crucial. Compatibility can be improved upon, if not achieved, through appropriate use of building orientation and location, landscaping, signage, lighting, and parking concepts. Staff recommends the following site design guidelines -particularly on Colonial Avenue frontage properties - for development or redevelopment of parcels in the corridor: Site Plan - Where feasible, businesses should attempt to share existing and future access points from the street right-of--way. - Site design should make a positive contribution to the streetscape and insure buffering from adjacent less intensive land uses. - Existing healthy vegetation should be preserved and incorporated into the plan. - Limit grading along adjacent property lines and where appropriate, preserve - for screening purposes. Building Orientation and Setback - Buildings should be prominent from street view, using architecture as a means of business advertisement. Setbacks should be determined according to ultimate road right-of--way. Building Scale - Size of buildings should approach a residential scale. If larger buildings are required, landscaping and architectural facades should be Used to lessen their impact. Parking Areas - Locate parking to the rear and sides of buildings. Street frontage should be devoted to building architecture and landscaping. - Landscape the perimeters and interiors of parking areas. Separate rows of spaces with planting islands. Large canopied trees placed among parking stalls will Reduce the heat island effect. Berms landscaped with shrubs, hedges and trees around the perimeter of a parking area will soften the noise, light, and view of a ' - parking area to its neighbors. Where appropriate, break up required parking into smaller areas spaced throughout the site, lessening their visual and environmental impacts. 2L Architecture Q~~ ~ n ~ Q~ Il (~( Q Avoid - Excessive height -Flat roofs - Buildings without a sense of entry -Building out of scale with adjacent structures • Building height, style, materials and design should be consistent with existing buildings. • Where infilling between existing residential structures, maintain a continuity of building height, width, first floor elevation, roof pitch, architectural style and porch detailing, if applicable. n n t~ 0 II Existing house with architecturally compatible addition Examples of existing architecturally compatible commercial development along Colonial Av. 23 Smell Scale Redevelopment's ------ , ~i ~ j ~----=+ --- -- ~ --- i ----- -~ '-- ---i ~ I f ~ ~ ~ i Proposed Screening & Buffer Requirements -Option 1: - 40'buffer yard i 1 large & small tree every 40' ' - 1 large shrub for every 5' f -.- F Vacated Property Line - I Screening & Buffer Requirements -Option 1: 15'buffer yard 6' high screening ~I i - iF~`, ~ . ., ~~ - _,~; i ~ Business ~ ..1 Entrance _ .. I ~ ~~ .i _ j ~- - Ii i ~ ~ ;~~ , ~ Street Yard i I Remains Mostly ~ Bui ding ~~ Unchanged ~ ~ ~ Addition i ~ -- ' - - Layout Parking to' Preserve Existing. ~~ Trees ! it ;I -~ i Future Shared f I Access Potential I ~---~ ~ Monumental Sign Colonial Av. 24 Large Scale _ _ _ - -_-_ ._-~~~. ' Commercial Developments _- -- - - _ ~ - _, '~ ~._ ~ ' - - --~- ~~- f ~y ~ l ~~~ _ ~ 'c /Future Shared Access Potential COlonlal Av. i I i ~ i ' I ~-- - T--; --- ~ ~ _ ~ - - - - -~ L`--? - -- y ~~- `~ ' ~ ~ .' - ~- Ve etated -~~~ i -~-~- ~ g :~ I ~ i Berm - ~ -- -- , - _ ,, ~. ~ _ _ ~ ~' Existing Vegetation - _ ~ ~i - ~ - ~ Preserved --~f - _ __ ~H. I -. ~ ; i ' - ~- -_- ~ t -' } ~ ~: -_._ i ~ Multi-i=amity -or- - _ - - ,- ~_ - f- - Ofii:ice Perk Development _ _ -- - ~ - ~_ ' ~ ~" ~, -- --- -T Proposed Screening & Buffer r~ _ --_- - __ _- Requirements -Option 1: ~ `~ _ _ Screening & Buffer' ~~ - 40' buffer yard ___ -- -- Requirements -Option 1 -- ~ ~~- _ - 1 large & small tree every 40' 15' buffer yard - 1 large shrub for every 5_ ~,__._. '~' _ 6' tall screening *~ ~ i,i ~ -r---- * ~ ---_ Screening & Buffering _ ~~ -,i ~_ ~ _ ' ~ il- -~ .__ ~- Requirements -Option 2: ~ --- - 25' buffer yard ~ ;, j. ~: ~ - small evergreen trees ~. ~ ~~`-~ - - a row of evergreen shrubs, '~~ - ~ !-- - - - ii - ~_ ~- ~~ ~ "~` =r . .. - 'I fix; ~ `Wl i ~ i --T `' 5 i~ i~ i~ n r THE COLONIAL AVENUE CORRIDOR Colonial Avenue is part of the existing highway network in the Roanoke Metropolitan Area. It provides a direct (radial) link from Brandon Avenue near the inner city of Roanolce to Route 419 (Electric Road) and Route 221 (Brambleton Avenue) in the outlying suburbs of Roanolce County. By providing this link between the inner city and developing suburbs the primary function of Colonial Avenue is to provide relatively unintemipted through travel. For the purpose of this analysis the Colonial Avenue will be split into two sections: 1) from Route 221 to Route 419 and 2) from Route 419 to Route 681. Roccte 221 (Brambleton Avenue) to Route 419 (Electric Road) Physical Characteristics and Land Use The entire length of this section of Colonial Avenue is characterized by two-10 foot travel lanes, no sidewalks or bicycle facilities, and one foot or less earthen shoulders. Separate turn lanes do exist at its intersection with Route 221 and Route 419. All intersections are unsignalized except for the ones at Route 221 and Route 419. This section of Colonial Avenue is categorized as a Minor Arterial. Typically, Minor Arterials such as Colonial Avenue serve less concentrated traffic-generating areas such as residential areas, neighborhood shopping centers and schools than do Major Arterials. This section of Colonial Avenue connects with two Major Arterials, Route 419 and Route 221; each of these roadways has much higher concentrations of commercial development than does Colonial Avenue. As shown in Appendix A (Figure A-1), the primary function of Colonial Avenue should be the safe movement of through traffic with a secondary function of access to residential areas, neighborhood shopping centers and schools. Typically, arterial roadways offer little or no direct access (driveway access) to residential development. Colonial Avenue, however is somewhat unique in that is does offer direct access to residents. The predominate land use along this section is residential and institutional (private school), with ' one area of commercial development at the intersection of Route 221. The spacing between residential driveways that access Colonial Avenue directly range in spacing from 60 feet to several hundred feet. The portion of the roadway with the most access points is the 0.25 mile ' segment from Route 687 (Penn Forest Boulevard) to Route 1521 (Girard Drive) - 10 residential access points. Traffic Volumes The most readily available and thorough traffic count data available for this section of Colonial t Avenue is the Secondary Traffic Tabulations taken by the Virginia Department of Transportation. This data was available for seven of the nineteen years since 1980; see Table 1 below. The importance of this data is that it documents how traffic has grown along this section ' of the roadway. 28 ' From 1980 to 1997 the average daily traffic (ADT) for this section has increased anywhere from 88% to 195%, depending on the segment. This represents a 5-11% growth rate per year. As ' shown in Table 1, the growth in Average Daily Traffic since 1980 has been significant. u Table 1: Average Daily Traffic Counts for Colonial Avenue (Route 221 to Route 419) Year Count Taken From To Length 1980 1982 1984 1986 1992 1994 1997 Change Route 221 Route 613 0.06 3384 3911 4934 5049 5723 9039 10000 195.51 (Brambleton Ave) (Merriman Rd) Route 613 Route 1620 0.21 3419 3792 4195 4261 5723 9785 8100 136.91 (Merriman Rd) (Hazel Dr) Route 1620 Route 687 0.07 3424 3515 4063 4112 5723 9697 7900 130.72 (Hazel Dr) (Penn Forest Blvd) Route 687 Route 1693 0.08 3200 3290 4074 4127 6489 7384 6500 103.13 (Penn Forest (Vest Dr) Blvd) Route 1693 Route 1521 0.17 3196 3203 4171 4239 6489 7384 6500 103.38 (Vest Dr) (Girard Dr) Route 1521 Route 419 0.28 3821 4078 5605 5692 6489 6954 7200 88.43 (Girard Dr) (Electric Road) Source: Virginia Department of Transportation (Traffic Engineering Division) -Secondary Traffic Tabulation ' In an effort to estimate travel demand as basis for determining the needed transportation supply in the year 2010, projections were made by linearly projecting historic ADT. This method bases projections on past trends and does not consider expected future changes in socio-economic ' characteristics or physical changes to the roadway. According to the information provided in Table 2, the ADT along this section of Colonial ' Avenue should continue to increase anywhere from 33-71%, depending on the segment. This represents a 2-5% growth rate per year. During this time period, traffic on the surrounding road system should also grow at a similar rate. C Table 2: Current and Projected ADT, and Projected Growth Rates for Colonial Avenue (Route 221 to Route 681) Section 1997 Actual 2010 Projected Projected '% From To Length ADT ADT Change Route 221 Route 613 0.06 10000 13282 32.82 (Brambleton Ave) , (Men-iman Rd) ~ Route 613 Route 1620 0.21 8100 11852 ~ 46.32 (Merriman Rd) (Hazel Dr) i Route 1620 Route 687 0.07 7900 11648 , 47.44 (Hazel Dr) ', (Perm Forest Blvd) 29 Table 2~ (rnntinuedl Section 1997 Actual 2010 Projected Projected From To Length ADT ADT , Change Route 687 Route 1693 0.08 6500 10783 65.89 (Penn Forest Blvd)', (Vest Dr) Route 1693 Route 1521 0.17 6500 11104 70.83 (Vest Dr) (Girard Dr) Route 1521 Route 419 0.28 7200 11189 55.40 (Girard Dr) (Electric Road) Source: Virginia Department of Transportation (Traffic Fngineenng 1)rvision) - secondary lramc i anuianon * -Data for the years 2010 and 2020 were tabulated using linear projection. Socio-economic factors were not used in these projections. Accident Data The only accident data that has been obtained is from the Virginia Department of Transportations Intersection Critical Rate Report for the Roanoke Valley Area. This report provides accident information for intersections that experience five or more accidents per year. This data was obtained for the most recent year, 1998. In this section of Colonial Avenue the only intersection that experienced enough accidents to be included in VDOT's report was the intersection of Route 419 (Electric Road) and Route 720 (Colonial Avenue). A total of eight accidents occurred at this intersection in 1998. Of these eight accidents only one included personal injury, while seven included personal property damage. Inclusion in Existing Plans 1. Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System Constriction Program (FY 2000) • Route 720 -Route 687 to Route 419 -reconstruct and replace bridge structure; project ID# 15189. See Appendix B for excerpt from Secondary System Construction Program (FY 2000) 2. Roanoke Valley Area Bikeway Plan (1997) • Route 221 (Brambleton Avenue) to Route 419 (Electric Road) -recommends widening 2-lane road to accommodate bicycle traffic. 3. Roanoke Valley Area Long Range Plan (1994) • Route 221 to Route 419 -recommends widening existing two-lane to 24 feet (12 foot lanes). 30 Route 4I9 (Electric Road) to Route 681 (Odgers Road) Physical Characteristics and Land Use The entire length of this section of Colonial Avenue is characterized by two-10 foot travel lanes, no sidewalks or bicycle facilities, and one foot or less earthen shoulders. Separate turn lanes do exist at its intersection with Route 419 and Route 681. All intersections are unsignalized except for the ones at Route 419 and Route 681. This section of Colonial Avenue is categorized as a Minor Arterial. Typically, Minor Arterials such as Colonial Avenue serve less concentrated traffic-generating areas such as residential areas, neighborhood shopping centers and schools than do Major Arterials. This section of Colonial Avenue connects with one Major Arterial, Route 419 that has much higher concentration of commercial development than does Colonial Avenue. As shown in Appendix A (Figure A-1), the primary function of Colonial Avenue should be the safe movement of through traffic with a secondary function of access to residential areas, neighborhood shopping centers and schools. Typically, arterial roadways offer little or no direct access (driveway access) to residential development. Colonial Avenue, however is somewhat unique in that is does offer direct access to residents. The predominate land use along this section is residential, with two areas of commercial development at the intersection of Route 419 and near the intersection of Route 1632 (Thompsons Lane). Most of the residential development along the corridor gains access to Colonial Avenue through intersecting local roads. There are, however, several residential driveways that access Colonial Avenue directly. These driveways range in spacing from 40 feet to several hundred feet. The portion of the roadway with the most access points is the 0.19 mile segment from Route 1632 (Thompsons Lane) to Route 1604 (Poplar Drive) - 14 residential and 3 business access points. Traffic Volumes The most readily available and thorough traffic count data available for this section of Colonial Avenue is the Secondary Traffic Tabulations taken by the Virginia Department of Transportation. This data was available for seven of the nineteen years since 1980; see Table 4 below. The importance of this data is that it documents how traffic has grown along this section of the roadway. 1 From 1980 to 1997 the average daily traffic (ADT) for this section has increased anywhere from 11% to 72%, depending on the segment. This represents a 1-4% growth rate per year. As shown in Table 4, the growth in Average Daily Traffic since 1980 has been low to moderate for this section. 31 Table 3: Average Daily Traffic Counts for Colonial Avenue (Route ~~~ to Route 419) Year Count Taken From To Length 1980 1982 1984 1986 1992 1994 1997 Change ~ Rotrte419 Route 682 0.04 8144 8207 9196 9313 12677 11955 14000 71.91 (Electric Road) (Manassas Dr) Route 682 Route 1625 0.12 8041 8123 8762 8851 12677 10200 10000 24.36 (Manassas Dr) (Green Valley li Dr) I Route 1625 Route 1632 0.06 7640 7714 8448 8525 12677 12367 9900 29.58 (Green Valley (Thompsons La) Dr) Route 1632 Route 1604 0.19 7692 7761 8388 8444 12677 12367 9900 28.71 (Thompsons La) (Poplar Dr) ~ Route 1604 Rotrte 1655 0.16 8217 8304 8664 8763 12677 12763 11000 33.87 (Poplar Dr) (Overdale Rd) Route 1655 Route 1626 0.12 8520 8614 9038 9159 12677 11198 9900 16.20 (Overdale Rd) (Georgetown Rd) Route 1626 Route 681 0.23 8927 9041 9557 9707 12677 11198 9900 10.90 (Georgetown Rd) (Odgers Rd) Source: Virginia Department of Transportation (Traffic Engineering Division) -Secondary Traffic Tabulation ' In an effort to estimate travel demand as basis for determining the needed transportation supply in the year 2010, projections were made by linearly projecting historic ADT. This method bases projections on past trends and does not consider expected fiiture changes in socio-economic characteristics or physical changes to the roadway. According to the information provided in Table 4, the ADT along this section of Colonial ' Avenue should continue to increase anywhere from 27-60%, depending on the segment. This represents a 2-4% growth rate per year. During this time period, traffic on the surrounding road system should also grow at a similar rate. 1 Table 4: Current and Projected ADT, and Projected Growth Rates for Colonial Avenue (Route 221 to Route 681) Section 1997 Actual 2010 Projected Projected From To Length ADT ADT Change Route 419 ~ Route 682 0.04 14000 17749 ~ 26.78 (Electric Road) (Manassas Dr) Route 682 Route 1625 0.12 10000 14336 43.36 (Manassas Dr) (Green Valley Dr) Route 1625 Route 1632 0.06 9900 15901 60.61 (Green Valley Dr) ~ (Thompsons La) 32 Table 4: (continued) ', Section 1997 Actual 2010 Projected Projected From To Length ADT ADT Change Route 1632 Route 1604 0.19 9900 15603 57.60 (Thompsons La) (Poplar Dr) Route 1604 Route 1655 0.16 11000 15529 41.18 (Poplar Dr) (Overdale Rd) Route 1655 Route 1626 0.12 9900 14149 42.92 (Overdale Rd) (Georgetown Rd) i Source: Virginia Department of Transportation (Traffic Engineering Division) -Secondary Traffic Tabulation * -Data for the years 2010 and 2020 were tabulated using linear projection. Socio-economic factors were not used in these projections. Accident Data The only accident data that has been obtained is from the Virginia Department of Transportations ' Intersection Critical Rate Report for the Roanoke Valley Area. This report provides accident information for intersections that experience five or more accidents per year. This data was obtained for the most recent year, 1998. ' In this section of Colonial Avenue two intersections experienced enough accidents to be included in VDOT's report. These intersections, at Route 419 (Electric Road) and at Route 682 ' (Manassas Drive) are located only 0.04 mile apart. A total of eight accidents occurred at the Route 419 intersection in 1998. Of these eight accidents only one included personal injury, while seven included personal property damage. A total of seven accidents occurred at the Route 682 ' intersection in 1998. Of these seven accidents none included personal injury, while all seven included personal property damage. ' Inclusion in Existing Plans ' 1. Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System Construction Program (FY 2000) • Route 720 -Route 419 to Route 681 -reconstruct, initial study to determine design options. See Appendix B for excerpt from Secondary System Construction Program (FY 2000) ' 2. Roanoke Valley Area Long Range Plan (1994) • Route 419 to Roanoke City Limits -recommends widening to four-lanes. 3 3' CURRENT ISSUES ALONG COLONIAL AVENUE • A recent rezoning request that was approved could lead to similar requests in the future. The approval of the request allowed the zoning to be changed from residential to commercial. This occurred along a segment of Colonial Avenue where several small commercial developments currently exist. • There is a significant amount of undeveloped land and land that could easily be redeveloped along the corridor. o Traffic volumes have steadily increased over the past 20 years. Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volumes have increase anywhere from 11% to 195%; with most segments experiencing increases above 70% during this period. This trend indicates that ADT volumes will continue to increase in the future. The increase in traffic volumes has created more conflicts at intersections and driveways. The current situation along certain segments of Colonial Avenue is that there are too many poorly spaced accesses that, in conjunction with increased ADT volumes are increasingly rendering the facility incapable of effectively serving its traffic-carrying function. 34 How to address these issues Access Management Traditionally, the goal of access management has been to provide adequate access to land development while simultaneously preserving the flow of traffic on the surrounding road system in terms of safety, capacity and speed. However, it has become increasingly apparent that the planning and design of both roadways and neighboring land uses must be coordinated not only to simultaneously preserve the functional integrity of the highway system while allowing efficient access to and from abutting properties, but also to serve the desired land use objectives of local communities. Access management is but one tool for managing transportation in a corridor. Other management strategies include improving transit service, reducing travel demands and making better use of street space (e.g. removing parking). The Neecl for Access Management Road systems serve two necessary, but often conflicting, functions: traffic movement and access to land. Arterial roadways should primarily serve longer distance through-traffic, while local streets should primarily provide direct access to land. Collector streets serve both functions to varying degrees. As cities expand, increased development along arterial highways generates more and more demand for driveways and intersecting local roads to serve abutting and nearby businesses, industries and neighborhoods. Without access planning and management, arterials become increasingly congested and safety is-compromised. Planning the number of and controlling the location of access points helps to ensure both the safe and efficient flow of traffic and improved service to adjacent lands. The functional integrity of the arterial is maintained and major capacity improvements are often not needed or can be delayed until a later date. At the same time, bicycle and pedestrian travel is made safer due to fewer sites for potential conflicts with vehicles turning into and out of intersecting driveways. In the older, developed portions of urban areas, access management is only possible on an ad hoc basis, with consolidation or removal of existing access being sought in conjunction with roadway reconstruction or urban redevelopment projects. It is primarily on the urban fringes that it is possible to coordinate transportation system improvements with land development to avoid creating situations where too much poorly spaced access renders a facility incapable of effectively serving its traffic-carrying function. When access management and land use planning are coordinated, it is possible to ensure that when properties are developed, site designs are compatible with efficient movement of traffic onto and off of public roadways and, at the same time, are conducive to pedestrian movements, bicycle traffic and transit usage. 35 ' Pro er access mana ement articular) with re and to s acin and t e of access can also be p g , P Y g p g Yp used as a tool, in conjunction with proper zoning, to help shape development patterns in a manner consistent with local community plans and desires. Improving Transit Service Currently, there is no fixed route transit that serves Roanoke County, including Colonial Avenue. Roanoke County's recently updated Comprehensive Plan does however call for transit service to be established in the County by the year 2010. Before service is established a study will need to be developed to determine the best locations for routing such a service. 36 COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION Colonial Avenue Corridor landowners have provided Roanoke County with valuable input for this study. Over 900 property owners were sent a detailed questionnaire requesting their opinions, reactions and concerns for the study area. In addition to the approximately 190 surveys returned, citizens were invited to a community meeting to express themselves on a range of issues critical to the future of the area. 116 citizens attended the meeting. Headline topics included land use, transportation, neighborhood/quality of life, the environment, and site design. Summaries of comments follow: Land Use - Attendees were concerned that residential property values will decrease with Colonial Avenue road improvements. Some residents want new commercial rezonings limited to C-1 and no "spot zoning". Others want to keep the existing land use pattern and community plan designation. Transportation - ' Citizens expressed their desires for sight distance improvements at the Poplar Drive, Georgetown Road and Penn Forest Boulevard intersections with Colonial Avenue. Most were not in favor of any widening of Colonial between VA 419 and Ogden Road. Residents want Roanoke County to keep them up to date on whatever plans VDOT generates regarding road widening. NeighborhoodlQuality of Life - Attendees want the residential character of the corridor to remain. They would like to see Brambleton Avenue improvements take precedent over more vehicular use of Colonial. ' Additional traffic signals and stop signs are needed as are sidewalks and bike lanes. Environment - Citizens were most concerned with drainage problems in the study area (see previous Stormwater discussion). Residence-to-business conversions have adjacent homeowners worried. Greenways are desired and the few remaining wooded or otherwise natural areas should be preserved. Site Design - Attendees want better enforcement of conditions regarding rezonings and special use permits where design is involved. Landscaping and existing vegetation are important to residents in the study area. Citizens also want lighting and drainage situations resolved. 37 Questionnaire: Roanoke County Colonial Avenue Study RESULTS OF SURVEY 1) Where do you live or own property in relation to Colonial Avenue? 46 a. Directly on Colonial Avenue 113 b. Within 2 blocks of Colonial Avenue 27 c. In the immediate neighborhood (but more than 2 blocks) 6 d. Other. Where? For questions 2-4, please rank all of the responses numerically based on importance or preference; with 1 being ' the best choice, 2 being the second best choice, etc. I 2) In your opinion, lots with frontage on Colonial Avenue should be used for (please rank): 1-Best 2 -Next Best 3 -Middle 4 -Next Worst 5 -Worst 6 -Other Single family residences 150 (30) 9 (3) 5 (2) 5 (3) 6 (3) 0 (0) Multi family residences 7 (2) 58 (13) 19 (5) 17 (4) 7 (1) 0 (0) Retail 3 (3) 3 (2) 6 (1) 15 (2) 57 (12) 0 (0) Professional Offices 12 (5) 27 (6) 31 (10) 24 {2) 7 (1) 0 (0) Mixed Uses 23 (7) 14 (4) 35 (5) 27 (11) 7 (2) 0 (0) Other 5 (1) 4 (2) 0 (0} 0 (0) 1 (0) 0 (0) 3) For resid ti l B 1 t en a - es purposes, development of Colonial Avenue frontage properties should be limited to: Single family residences 150 (33) 'l ' Multi family residences 13 (6) l (condominiums, apartments, etc.) A combination of housing 30 (8) ' types within a planned development Other 1 (0) 4) For commercial 1-Best purposes, development of Colonial Avenue frontage properties should be limited to: ' Small businesses utilizing 103 (24) the existing structures and lots as-is Conversion of existing 18 (4) structures to businesses (with possible structural changes). ' Combining lots and 15 (7) building new office complexes Other 34 (5) -Middle I 3 -Worst 14 -Other 12 (5) 12 (4) 0 (0) 38 (9) 40 (9) 3 (1) 43 (11) 28 (9) 2 (0) 3 (3) 0 (0) 0 (0) 2 -Middle 3 -Worst 4 -Other 12 (5) 9 (3) 0 (0) i5 (13) 10 (5) 2 (1) 12 (4) 50 (11) 4 1 (1) 0 (0) 0 3'8 5) Which measures could keep office and commercial developments compatible with adjacent residential neighborhoods (check as many as apply)? 115 25 a. Use of fences, trees, hedges, etc., to screen office and commercial developments from residences 57 11 b. Facing office and commercial developments away from adjacent residential property lines 78 15 c. Setting office and commercial developments further away from adjacent residential property lines 121 28 d. Design of office and commercial buildings in architectural styles that blend with residential neighborhoods. 27 10 e. Other. 6) Which measures could enhance the visual quality of development along Colonial Avenue (check all that apply)? 82 19 a. Improving architectural style of buildings 84 18 b. Tightening sign controls 112 29 c. Landscaping front yards and parking areas 102 27 d. Placing parking to side and rear of property 86 21 e. Plantings along the road frontage 71 15 f. Maintaining existing vegetation in front, side and rear yards of frontage lots 21 4 g. Other. 7) Are you aware that the Virginia Department of Transportation is considering improvements to Colonial Avenue in Roanoke County from Penn Forest Boulevard to Ogden Road? 54 18 Yes 128 26 No (3 No answer) 1 8) If Colonial Avenue were to be improved, what measures would you be in favor of (check all that apply) 26 7 a. Four-laving Colonial Avenue 92 19 b. Putting in a center turn lane ' 47 8 c. Limiting the number, location, and spacing of driveways along Colonial Avenue 118 32 d. Discouraging through-traffic 17 7 e. Vehicular access only by alleys to the rear of frontage lots 13 2 f. Putting in a median that would limit left-handed turns 30 5 g. Utilizing "traffic-calming" methods (traffic circles, landscaped curved medians, etc.) 80 12 h. Construction of sidewalks/bicycle lanes/greenways 13 7 i. Other. ' 9) What are the three most important issues facing Colonial Avenue and neighboring properties (please only three)? 135 37 a. Traffic flow and capacity: congestion along Colonial and the difficulty for residents in g onto it 21 6 b. Decline of visual quality: sign congestion, inadequate landscaping, above ground pow 101 19 c. Maintaining dominant residential character of area (encroachment of commercial uses 72 22 d. Safety (both pedestrian and vehicular) along corridor 52 12 e. Need for planned development: blending the various areas into homogeneous develo and preventing strip-like development, planned residential and office developments 79 13 f. Overdevelopment of corridor ' 32 (9? g. Environmental quality: poor air quality, sound and visual nuisances (lighting), stormwa control 22 7 h. Intergovernmental coordination: Do Roanoke City and Roanoke County have compati plans for the corridor? 4 (3) i. Other. 1 Numbers for respondents with Colonial frontage lots only are shown in (parentheses) TOTAL NUMBER OF SURVEY RESPONSES: 192 check etting er lines pments ter ble 39 0 c n m n 0 0 D N c F' m Ul C N Number of Responses ~ ~~ 0 ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 _ ~w i _._____Jr. --L.--_~__~.L-_____. ----__l v n D~ _ I o i ~ m n o ~ ;! ;~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ i ' ` ~, v~ I ~ -~ o _ .o o ~ r _~ SU N ~ ~ ~ D a ° ~ n ~. c c ~°; , m o ~ c~ _~ - y '~ ~ ~ m cQ. -,+ ' O ~ a ~ ~ m !:_. e D ~ ~03• ~ y N o ~ ~ ~ ~ a a o o ^ ~~v ~ ~ ~ m ~,5~ v '. ~- ~;; ~i s a ~~ o f _ I ~ 3 m - a ~ ~ a _ ~ „s ~ ,` ~, ~~ 40 DI C 7 ID ~.. ~ _~. mad ~ <~ ~~ a ° ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ moo ~ _ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~, O N .p ~ OD o 0 0 0 ° ~ ~ ~ 3 m w °~ ~ ~_ ~3•~ v a o y. c ~ ~ m~4 m ~ m m ~' m a ~~ ' , ~ ~a ~ a~ a c ~p ~. t ~ ii ;I ~dl~ '~ ~ ~~ , ~ 3.~~ ~ ~ . o Q. 0 3 ~ a d ~ ~ ~ ;. 0 as ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ f". 3 m ~ ~ as ~ m J ~ ~ O O O O ~ .~ v a v ~ ~; o ~ O c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ II ~, `° o ~ c a a ~ ~ ~p ~ to O ~ co (7 f av ~' ,' m o V ° a ~ o• a ~ c ~ . i I N m < ~ c - n: - ~ ~ ~ a, ~ . o . -, cD ~p ~ ~, . ~ m °' m ~ °' a 1 rE t~ ~ o slps~ : ` ~ ~ - ' m ~ rn ~ ~ , ~ ~ lu ~'~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ f~ i t:, a `w~ f ~ ~ d O K ~ C ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 a ~ ~Lj ~~s ~ o _ ~' N N ~ ~ ~ O .a ~ < ~ c fA ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Sr~rU`5~ ' '- Q p+ ~ ~ ~ fQ :fin ~ _ ,~-~ z p~ O ~ ~ y (D N ~ V1 ~ ~ ~ ~ o - a o . ,, ` m ,. _. i y ~+. , r.. O ,•« N N C cD N O O Oi ~; C ~~~ 'V'/ a a cD pt 41 0 c n m n 0 0 d D m c m n F' yn ~0 0 • ~ ? © ~ ~ c a ~' ~ ~ a m ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ cG m ~ ~ ~ ~ C ' O-~ O -+ ~ N N W W A ' ~ t~ 3 ~ C ~ ~ i O O (n O GJ~ O (T O CJ fD ~ ~ 3. O ~ O C a `~ ~ ~ c w ~ °~ m ~ ~ ~i ~ ~ -'. o a ~ ~ w ~ ~ . !it o ° °o m .a ao 3 a~ ° a v_, d ~' c ~ w ' c -, ~, ~~ 3 . ~ w c ° ~ l ,~ ~ . ~ . _ ~ m ~ ~ N H -e o ~ a~ w Q m p ° o ~ co r+; o ~ , ~ G i ~ :.: ~ ~ O ~ a ~ ~ ~, y -~ O n~ r ~ ~ n ~ cn ~m ~ ~ ~ 3 O ~ o °c oa ~ ~ ~ ~ ., ;; O ° °" ° <c o a c L~ C) r: a~ ° v i < o: ° ~' ~ m ~ o ~, m o. ~ m .D ~ m ° 0 ~ ~ m c- ~ c II1 - °' m ~ °' ° ~ a ~ `C o ° ° a° y ~ a N ~ tD ° N m ° o ~ m ~° ~ ~;, ~ ~` ~ } C C7 ~' a c ~ ~ c ~~~.< ~ u ~. m ~ ~ -, d ? ~~ ~ ' ~ < ~ ° ~~ ~ ~ c ~ N ~ N ~, ~ d ~o 3 o ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ r* ,~- ~ < c ~ ~ :a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ° o ... :~~ 0 0- ~ ~ ~ r. ~ ~; m 42 J N~N ~Y N , 3 w o I r A t. y ~ D '~- .~1~._~.____1 1_ ~ ~__- 3 ~ L __ __ __ ~ _.. 3_ ~ ~ a d '~ $ ^1 a ~~ o u, ~ ~ z a O ~ H n ~~ 7 7 Number of Responses W _ N ~ (!1 o N ~ ~ -1----_-l N a eo d '0 <D 7 A O n O_ O _~ t11 D c~ c c~ N c a O 7 at ~D r 43 0 c 1 n ~^^ l/ 4 0 ci D c m n c ~ ~ _ ~ ^ ~ < ~ a ~ ~ ~• - o ~ (D ~ n mber of Responses ~ ~ N N W W ~ o cn o cn o cn o ~ C 3 N ' o ~ a ° ° ~' c n cn ~ ~ ~ ~ x ~ ~ c ~; a ~ ~ N• ~ ~ ~ _ to ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ (D C ~ N 3 C1 X i ~ ~ N i V '=' ~ ~ Q n _ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~• ~ ~ ~ ~ w c u, D N ~ X W <D ~ N ~ ~ C C ~ C ~D d O O p ~ C .. to ~ N ~ Q' • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d C ~ TI C ~ ~ N N ~ 3 ~ ~ r ~ ° c \• . (D `~ V! :_ _ ~ ~_ `~ 44 ~i 3 aw a. ~S ~~ ~ 7 cD cD n eD O C co O TI O Ot tG tD r 0 y n O O of D c e~ c a D 0 c~ r 0 O w ~ ~'~°v ~ o ,~~ ~ `° Q~A ~ • ?~ ;~ ~ ~: o °° ~~ a ~ , ° ~' ~ ~ ~ _ F C~ A ~ a ~ m O N d .f A .~+, ,,,r /Q 3 ~ ~~AA n'~ ai ~ ' o _ ~ ~ m ~~ -+ ~oo~~ r,~,, ` ~ sv ~3AA 4 3 ~ d ~ m >. co , a a ~ ,~ ~, ' n n ~ ~LL O x~it ~ 4 ~D ~ -.~s n Ol \ \\ ~ `, :r ~ ~~ 3 ~~ d r.. v' D c~ s rn N _~ <D N a ~i t7 0 y 3 \ 3 ~ 3 ~ n, ~ ~ d ~ O ~ ~ A fAD A ~ ~ vo3~~ `~ ~ ~y~ ~ s+ < y ~ a ~ ~ ~dod o ~ ~'•"~ c fD N ~ ~ ~ N . 3 46 47 7 J J J .1 ~ N A O O O N ? O~ ~ O O O O O O O O O L I I I 1 I I~ I ti' m r ~' ~ ~ a~ y~ yyp~ 33 ~ ~ Iii ~~~~ I jih ~' ~I P 11 //~ { I' ~ -7. _ ~ _... ~ 0° ' ~ ~ y ~ ~~ ' ~ f c~ 3 / ~ ---- ~ ~~ a w / c~ a ~ ~ / N cD ~a= W ~ N ~ :,..: . i A TI / y' ~ ~ J ~ ' ~ -~ ~ ~ ~ e~` y f. j' ~ _ c- o ~ ~~a ~ ~n ~ ,,,~ ~ O O 3 ~ f / y ~ H ~. ~1 ~ / A N~o j /i "`~ ~ A A y ~ f ~ W ~ C ~ (~ N ~ fl. Q 1 _ a N C tD ~ Cf y ~ D N Oa 48 Number of Responses ~ $ ~' A Q S A 1 ~ __ . i ~r~ f° 3 _., d ~ D ~. ~, y a d y ~~ ~ ~ ~od ,S ~ g 3 ° ~ :~ ~ ~n~ , ~~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 .~ y 7 A N a c~ ... ~i e~ e~ 0 n 0 0 w~ W D e~ c ~D C a r H 49 ii a o ~ ~ = c ~ a ~ ~ ~ < ~~ w o _ m N ? r+ ~ N A fD 7 ,~ d \?e3p ~ C 7 y ay ,fir ~ n -- ~ ~ V ~ ~ ~ S1 ~ ° N ' N a ~ ___ a Cf ~ d ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ Y n• ~ d 3~ _~ ~ ~~3 ~ ~ ,_ d ~ ,o ~ ~ _ N y c ~ -~ c~ M ~ ~ ^~' n _., `~ o ~,.- ~ ~; 3 is x ° .+ ,. , ~ ~ 3 N ,. 4 ~ ~ ~ 3 ~4r~~i5 N ~ H •`?~` n ~~ O n r= `_ ri gyk iL~ L f ~~ S } ~a•" ~ t ~ C ¢ "' W ~ : ~ ~ Q ` ~ '' ~ ~ ~ ~ ^~ ~~ D ~<N'~ ~D ~ ~ ~ 3 '~ ` i T p1 o ~ O d ~ .''s` ~TMr" O n n ~ ~ _f ~?'; ~' _ 3 3 t0 ~ ~ ... 1 ~ ~ ~_ a ~_ ~ Q d ~ ~ A ___ ~ ~ < ~ ~ 1 3 C ~' 3 `D d 3 fD 51 m ? A ~ ~ C o~-~ V ~1 ~ ~ „* A e A A A - O ~' N y ~ ~ _ ~ ~ '~C ~ f: ~11~ ~ ~ v fN n O C ~ ~ '"_ ~ .~, ~T w~~' _ e ~ ~ ~_, O f„ .'t` C ~ { 3' , .~ _ a. ~' ~ ~ ~ ~, o D y y ~ ~ ~ ~ e 3 O Q Aga c ~. 3 ~m ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ o ~ c a~ .. 3 3 N ~ :~ At y ~3 ~. ID 3 A ~ C. .~+ 3 0 3m ~ c n f D ~ o_ ~ O ~ t0 A A 1 C 3 3 ~O ~~ ~D ~-- 3 O ~D 3 c~ H ~D iD 7 n fA n O_ O 3 N D e~ c e~ c a D c~ 0 r. t~ e~ r y ~1 ~ N ~ ? a0 d ~ N .~i y A ~ ~ ~ ~! A rt n ' !~ Ot v c ~ H 3 m ~ ~ C1 ~ °~ o ~ 3 N w N ~ ~ O ~ O ~ A -w N ~ 52 0 c n o ~ ° ,~ ~ 3 am 3 D 3 ~ ~D Ot ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ p n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - - ~ ~ 3 if1 cn ~ (Q ~~':_ ~ O )t a ~ ~ ; 3 N 7 C ~ ~°: ~+ ~ ~ ~ ~ C a '~;}~:; ~ Ot k ~~. _~rt~ F rn , , -'.r : d ..x, 0 A ~- ~ ~ n % r ~' ~ m '~ 3 ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1"~ J ~ 0 ~ ~ a ~ cD ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N a . r 3 .. ~ ', a- ~° '~ ~ ~. ~h 4 - ~ O_ yr ; l1~ O ; O ~~- `s II__ o = A ~ ~ ~• ~ ~ ~ ~ .Ar N ~ ~ C ~ 's ~ _ \ "F; ~ ~ ~ c ~ Q. I tD ~ 3 ~ ~ y ~ m ~ d ~ ce y ~ m' ~ ~ .o ~ , o ~ ~ o ~ 3 m o d 3 M 0 N d ~ tll f11 a a. 53 0 c n m ~ o ai ~ ~• pt ui < ~~ 3 < ~ ~ ~ !31 i 3 ~ O p _ _ _ - o ~ 7 - 2 ~ S `t p ~ N ~ ~~ A m ~ - ,~ ~ 3 3 ~ ~ z N r~,~ ~, ~ -.. - ~ .moo a •3 - ~ ~ ~ 3 m ~ m c 2 O ' ~' ` s> '_' O ~ fD ~ O x ~ a '' c ~ ~ ' ~~~ ~ ' w ~ ~ - ~ arc n > ~, ao ~ ~D . y ' i~ ~ . _ --. „~ ~ r. "i~~~ .y r O ~ , ~: w ~ ~ / ~ ~ A ' ~ ~ to ~ ~.~ ~ ~ 7~'• N ...,. ~.~ ' ` ~•~ - ~ O N ~ O ID a O e° _ O m 3 ~. Q ~ ~ ~ O < ~ e~ <D 3 ~ ~ ' C e C ~ ~ _~ a ~ ~ A C ~ N ~ ~ - D ~ ~ m ~ o 3a ~ N ~~ ~ r a~ ~ ' ~ ~ 8. N ~: m c O e ~ ~ H 3 nt 3 ~ "~ 41 ~ N O Q w 54 IV GUIDELINES ' FUTURE LAND USE On December 14, 1999, the Roanoke County Planning Commission was presented an overview of citizen and staff efforts concerning the entire study thus far. A range of alternative future land use plans and maps were reviewed by the Commission. At this stage, the selection of a combination of mixed residential and commercial uses has been made for in-depth work according to framework language which appears below as ' "Alternative III -Mixed Use Residential/Commercial". A proposed Future Land Use map is also included. ' After further review, the Planning Commission approved the "Colonial Avenue Corridor Proposed Design Guidelines For Development /Redevelopment" and the proposed future land use map titled "Colonial Avenue Corridor Alternative II" on July 5, 2000. This ' action redesignated parcels on the north side of Colonial Avenue between Colonial Avenue Baptist Church and Poplar Drive from Neighborhood Conservation to the Transition future land use category. ' S5 FUTURE LAND USE ALTERNATIVES FOR THE COLONIAL AVENUE CORRIDOR Existing Pattern This option would consist of maintaining the residential character of the corridor. Although there are a few scattered businesses, and some higher concentrations along the intersections with major thoroughfares, the focus on the corridor would be the existing predominantly residential character. Protection of historically established neighborhoods would be encouraged. Strategies for implementation of this approach would include: a) Maintenance of the "status quo" in the Community Plan with regards to existing and future land use. Revise the Community Plan to further strengthen the County's vision for the corridor. b) Keep existing residential zoning districts throughout the corridor. c) Work with the Virginia Department of Transportation to take Colonial Avenue off the 6-year ' transportation improvement program. d) Make an effort to remove any commercial nonconformities from the corridor and discourage ' additional development as such. e) Recommend denial of commercial rezoning applications. Develop strategies to detour/discourage through-traffic. Implement pedestrian access system and links to other neighborhoods/commercial areas. ' f) Adopt special sensitive corridor overlay district to address issues such as traffic volume, design/improvement of structures, pedestrian ways, noise, trees, and other natural features. II. Growth with Residential Focus The preservation of residential units is the focus, but the area may be seen as in a state of minor transition into more intense use types. This approach should be open to limited office-type uses similar to existing commercial uses (and the conversion of R-1 residences and lots into limited R-2 multi-family uses). Land uses should be unobtrusive and have minimal impact on the adjacent neighborhoods. Strategies for implementation of this approach would include: ' a) Perform a study to determine likely or most feasible properties for transition, and develop a land use plan which identifies these and their best uses. Amend the Community Plan to reflect this. ' b) Retention of as much of the single-family residences as possible. Amend the Community Plan to reflect the possibility of more intense development such as apartments, previously existing single- , family home conversions into smaller apartments, townhouses, and single business sites. c) Using the land use plan and community plan, allow limited rezonings only on targeted properties ' and only for the designated purposes. d) Work with the Virginia Department of Transportation to develop a plan for Colonial Avenue improvements. This approach acknowledges that improvements to the road are likely, but not necessarily intense in nature. Alternatives may include a center turn lane, widening the shoulders, 56 1 ' eak-hour no left turn requirements (Manassas), pedestrian and bicycle circulation patterns, or p other traffic calming techniques. Colonial Avenue could ultimately be a study project for VDOT to ' investigate traffic calming techniques. e) With consent of owners, rezone existing commercial properties back to residential. ' f) Adopt a sensitive use overlay district for the corridor, which identifies features and uses that need to be preserved, use types that need to be avoided, and special structural architectural standards, ' which give the corridor the appearance of a residential neighborhood. Possibly set up a citizens architectural review board with outside interests lending their expertise. ' III. Mixed Use Residential/Commercial This approach focuses on a mixed-use environment, recognizing the possibility that the best use for frontage lots or properties at major intersections may be some sort of limited commercial. While the ' possibility of some commercial development is likely, any such development should blend with the adjacent neighborhood. Commercial uses are typically single business establishments in structures that for the most part retain their residential character. Pedestrian and vehicle circulation systems and their ' functionality are critical. Land uses should blend with the adjacent neighborhoods. Strategies for implementation of this approach would include: ' a) Amend the Community Plan to reflect the possibility of small-scale commercial development and planned commercial projects along the corridor. ' b) Rezone the frontage lots to NC Neighborhood Commercial or C-1 Commercial to allow for by-right development. ' c) Develop a special corridor overlay district for that recognizes the sensitivity of the neighborhoods. The district would have architectural and other performance standards related to minimal impact in the area. Standards could include regulations on the structures themselves, landscaping and buffers, location and type of parking, hours of operation, signage and lighting restrictions, access to ' lots (alleys instead of directly off Colonial) and use types. d) Work with Virginia Department of Transportation to devise a program for better circulation along the corridor. This may involve road improvements, signalization, pedestrian walkways and cyclist lanes, and no left turn requirements. Program should include the possibility of private alleyways behind frontage lots. e) Draft a land use plan to determine present and ideal future uses for parcels. This may involve parcel-specific research by staff identifying best uses for each. IV. Office District Extension of existing commercial development along the corridor is the focus of this approach. Established nodes and centers are seen as anchors for future businesses. However, basic uses will be general offices and not retail. The corridor essentially is in transition to becoming a truly mixed-use area with established residential neighborhoods and office commercial development. Much of the new ' projects should be establishments identified as necessary and useful for the immediate neighborhood, therefore maximizing their utility and usefulness. Prospective businesses may combine parcels in order to locate their operations there, and development standards similar to those of a PRD or PCD are ' necessary. Larger office buildings are a possibility. Strategies for implementation of this approach 57 ' would include: ' a) Amend the Community Plan to reflect a change in existing policy and vision for the Colonial Avenue corridor. The amendments would include provisions for small offices and office park-type uses. b) Rezone the frontage lots to C-1 Commercial and encourage rezonings to PCD to reflect the future vision of the corridor. ' c) Develop a special set of standards for planned residential and commercial developments which minimize the impacts on the adjacent residential neighborhoods. These could include such things as ingress/egress, parking, lighting, landscaping, use types as related to noise and building design. d) Work with the Virginia Department of Transportation to devise a street improvement plan for Colonial Avenue. Pedestrian and bicycle access and use are a vital element, as commercial uses may be designed to target the immediate neighborhoods. This may involve the addition of sidewalks, bike lanes, one or more lanes, stop lights, or other elements. Particular attention should be paid to the level of traffic and effective circulation patterns. e) Draft a land use plan which identifies specific goals for growth and ideal land use types, which would include uses the residents view as necessary, offices and office support services. Retail uses would be prohibited. ' V. Commercial District This approach would essentially be the commercialization of a recognized high traffic corridor, and a link between Roanoke City and outlying areas in the County. Existing commercial nodes would be extended as "commercial infill" would be encouraged. The primary focus of the transition would be the frontage lots, and uses would include not only general offices but retail uses as well. This approach would allow for the combination of lots for larger-scale developments. Favorable use types would reach beyond the needs of the immediate neighborhoods. Strategies for implementation of this approach ' would include: a) Amend the Community Plan to reflect this change in existing policy and vision for the Colonial ' Avenue corridor. The amendments would include provisions for larger-scale general commercial and retail development and planned commercial developments. b) Rezone the frontage lots to C-2 Commercial and encourage rezonings to PCD to reflect the future vision of the corridor. c) Develop a special set of standards for minimizing the impacts on the adjacent residential neighborhoods. These standards would also set criteria for the extension of commercial development beyond the frontage lots when appropriate. Protection for the adjacent neighborhoods is scaled down from previous approaches. Standards might include such things as ingress/egress, stormwater management, alternate entry points/alleyways, parking, lighting, landscaping, use types as related to noise and building design. d) Work with the Virginia Department of Transportation to devise a street improvement plan for Colonial Avenue. Pedestrian and bicycle access may not carry as high a priority as in previous approaches, and commercial uses are intended to service a larger market beyond existing neighborhoods. Expansion of existing facilities is likely in this approach, and the emphasis is on 58 smooth through-traffic movement and capacity management. e) Draft a land use plan to accommodate the transition to a highly visible and commercially vital corridor. While pedestrian facilities and neighborhood protection are a lower priority, the plan still recognizes these and contains strategies to accomplish each. Extensive research should be conducted on approaches other communities throughout the country have taken to produce an ideal commercial district. This should include a plan that balances vehicle and pedestrian traffic, blends different use types, and minimizes impacts on adjacent residential development. Colonial ' Avenue could be seen as a model commercial corridor for future transitional areas in Roanoke County. ii u 59 vial Avenue Corridor suture Land Use Proposed Neighborhood Conservation Development Transition Core Study Area Boundary Prepared by the Roanoke County Department of Community Develops Scale December 22, 1999 II ii COLONIAL AVENUE CORRIDOR PROPOSED DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPMENT/REDEVELOPMENT ' BackQ .,round i~ Colonial Avenue provides a vital link in the regional highway network from the inner city of Roanoke to the outlying suburbs of Roanoke County, As development has increased over the years around the inner city area, the function of Colonial Avenue has stayed the same. This increase in development has had a direct impact on the roadway as traffic volumes rise steadily. ' High traffic volumes and the availability of developable land often cause developers to seek locations along such comdors for new commercial development. This situation has begun along the Colonial Avenue corridor. As commercial pressures increase, the importance of protecting established neighborhoods and ensuring the safe and efficient flow of traffic becomes more crucial. It is also important to ensure a comfortable transition for existing residential frontage properties if neighboring parcels become commercial. Compatibility can be improved upon, if not achieved, through the proper use of building style, orientation and location, landscaping, signage, lighting, parking concepts and access management. Staffrecommends the following site design guidelines -particularly on Colonial Avenue frontage properties -for development or redevelopment in the corridor. Goal • To plan for and achieve compatibility between new and existing developments along the corridor. Design Guidelines Objectives - To encourage well designed, aesthetically pleasing developments that make a positive contribution to the streetscape and lessen potential negative impacts on adjacent residential properties. - To encourage architectural compatibility with the surrounding residential character. - To minimize impacts to traffic flow from new developments. - To encourage the use of landscaping to improve environmental quality within new developments, enhance property values and create an enduring community image. - To limit light pollution onto adjacent residential areas and encourage human scale in detail lighting. - To minimize sign clutter by encouraging attractive, well-placed signage. I. Existing Conditions A. The proposed development should show sensitivity to the existing residential character of the corridor by incorporating as many of the following as possible: 1. The preservation and use of existing residential structures for small offices (architecturally compatible alterations and additions are permitted), or the construction of new buildings having a distinct residential character. 2. The preservation and incorporation of existing vegetation. ' 3. Front yard character that is a common feature of residential properties should be preserved. 4, Depending upon terrain, the use of terraced parking lots, minimizing their visual and site impacts, may be appropriate. 5. Existing drainage ways should be protected and incorporated into all proposals. II. Site Layout A. Buildings ' 1. A building should be prominent from street view, using its architecture as advertising. 2. Setbacks should be determined according to ultimate road right-of--way. 3. Minimum distance between a building, off-street parking, driveway, loading space or paved ' surfaces and any contiguous residential property should be 25 feet. B. Parking ' 1. Parking should be constructed to the rear and sides of buildings only. Street frontage should be devoted to building architecture and landscaping. 2. Parking areas should be designed to allow future interconnections with adjacent parcels. ' 3. Where feasible, break up required parking into smaller areas spaced throughout the site, lessening their visual and environmental impacts. 4. Alternative surface materials, such as pervious pavement, are recommended. Asphalt pavement should be minimized to mitigate existing drainage problems. ' C. Site Access 1. Where feasible, businesses should share access points from the street right-of--way. Temporary access points may be utilized until further development of the corridor allows for ' combined access. These temporary permits are issued with the understanding that they will be closed when a satisfactory alternate access in available in the opinion of the local governing body. 2. At the time of project approval property owners should provide a joint easement agreement allowing cross access to and from other properties in the surrounding area and a unified parking and circulation plan should be established wherever feasible. III. Architectural Treatment ' A. Scale 1. Size of buildings should approach a residential scale. Avoid excessive height and buildings out of scale with adjacent structures. 2. Where larger buildings are proposed, landscaping and architectural facades should be used to lessen their impact. 3. Where infilling between existing residential structures, maintain a continuity of building height, ' width, first floor elevation, architectural style and porch detailing, if applicable. B. Entrances 1. Design entrances that are clearly visible and easily recognizable from parking lots and walkways which serve the building. i~ i~ it u 2. The principal "front" facade should face Colonial Avenue, for all buildings directly adjacent to the road, although the major pedestrian entrance may be in the back or side of the structure. C. Materials 1. Materials should be selected for harmony with the surrounding community and for suitability to the type of building and style in which they are used. 2. Exterior materials such as exposed concrete block, metal or brightly colored siding are not recommended. Materials should be in the range of earth tones. D. Roofs Utilize dormers, gables and other variations in roof shapes and/or heights that are compatible with the basic facade elements and add interest and scale to the building. Avoid flat roofs. Gable roofs, hip roofs and multiple plain roofs are encouraged. IV. Landscaping A. Native Vegetation 1. Landscape plans should incorporate the use of native vegetation. B. Adjacent Right-of--Way Plantings 1. Front yards should be developed as open green spaces with a combination of large and small trees, evergreen & deciduous shrubs, earth berms, and/or ground covers. 2. Where it is necessary that portions of a parking lot front the adjacent right-of--way, a planting strip of 10 feet in width should be provided along the adjacent right-of--way. Within this strip a combination of large and small trees, evergreen & deciduous shrubs, earth berms or ground covers should be utilized to buffer the parking area. C. Parking Areas 1. Parking areas should incorporate raised landscaped islands in order to break up large expanses of pavement. 2. Large shade trees should be planted within and along the perimeter of parking areas in order to mitigate the negative environmental effects of heat and glare. 3. Landscaped berms located around parking areas to soften the noise, light and view of a parking area to its neighbors are highly encouraged. D. Building Plantings 1. Buildings should incorporate foundation plantings where appropriate. E. Stormwater Management Above- ground stormwater management areas and facilities should be landscaped with plants adaptable to being temporarily inundated with water and designed as an asset to the overall development. F. Screening & Buffering Where a development adjoins residential property, a 25-foot wide buffer yard should be required. a. Within this buffer yard landscaping and screening should be provided and maintained to an 1 i~ V. Lighting average height of 15 feet. A combination of large and small trees, evergreen & deciduous shrubs, earth berms and/or ground covers should be utilized. Berming is encouraged to supplement screening. Average berm height should be 3-4 feet. Berm slopes should be no greater than 2:1. A. Details of lighting fixtures should be compatible with the existing residential character of the corridor. ' B. Path and landscape lighting are encouraged where appropriate. Lighting should be at a pedestrian scale through the use of light standards or placements 14 feet or less in height. C. Parking lot lighting should be no more than 14' above grade, down-lit or shielded so as to direct light to the interior of the lot and not project glare onto the street or adjacent properties. Average intensity should not exceed the minimum required for safety. D. Any security lighting should be shielded and located so as to not cast light onto adjacent properties. In addition, the light source should not be visible from adjoining residential areas. VI. Signage A. The shared use of signs is encouraged for adjacent businesses. ' B. SianaQe should com lement a buildin s' architectural st le. b b P g y C. Signage placed on buildings should occupy less than 5% of the facade area. D. All freestanding signs should be monument type and meet the following criteria: 1. Monument signs should not exceed 5 feet in height or 7 feet in width; 2. Signs should be ground lit or top lit with shielded lamps placed so as to not cast light onto the path of traffic or on any adjacent road or property. E. Message length should be limited so that a passing motorist can read a sign within three-to-four seconds. No interchangeable boards should be permitted. F. Signs should be complemented, accented and enhanced by landscaping. The size of the ' landscaping plot should be one and one-half times the square footage of the sign. G. No portable or temporary signs should be permitted. r APPENDIX A FUNCTIONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF ROADWAYS The street and highway systems typically serve two major functions: the movement of traffic between dispersed points and the provision of access to individual properties. Because of the distinct characteristics of these two functions no single roadway type can safely or efficiently meet all travel needs. Thus, five roadway types are frequently utilized to describe the movement of vehicles from origin to destination. Figures 1 below and Figure 2 on the following page illustrate this concept. Of these five roadway types, there are three -Major Arterials, Minor Arterials and Collectors - where through traffic predominates. The entire length of Colonial Avenue, from Brandon Avenue in Roanoke City to Route 221 is categorized as a Minor Arterial. Typically, Minor Arterials such as Colonial Avenue serve less concentrated traffic-generating areas such as residential areas, neighborhood shopping centers and schools than do Major Arterials. Colonial Avenue connects with two Major Arterials, Route 419 and Route 221; each of these roads has much higher concentrations of commercial development than does Colonial Avenue. As shown in Figure 1 below, the primary function of Colonial Avenue should be the safe movement of through traffic with a secondary function of access to residential areas, neighborhood shopping centers and schools. Typically, arterial roadways offer little or no direct access (driveway access) to residential development. Figure A-1: Function of Roadway Types Af.L ~t~VEMEN`f L.l,,. ~~~~ Curn~lete sr~ess control, little local traffic. ~~~~~~ F1~1~TI~JN hto through lratfic, ` unreslrpcled access. `~ ~ ~ r~rr I~~lY~~I~I~ r ALL ACCESS ~ nnni ,nrrzGa.~rrn~ IYI!"1NV3\ V4.vv..vr.r~i vvw~.rv ~-••- ARTERIAL ARrERfAL FtJNCTI~~IAI. CA~S~IFCATIC~N Figure A-2: Example Layout of Road Network LB:ilNllir.X d3Yx-~CL L iA+RTCt7 tq~!1TR ~Ll. E.D A.CLLS6 °"Y ~ ' ' , / 4BrLiTtII4 l~ L ~Nl'{~ ~,1sy~'1~ F a"~ ~` L""tpL.iLC7~A '~TftEEgS t ~ w ~ ,,, ~t~~k+G~ i4LAl~TR~E'6~r , y ,, .w ~y ~F~: ~ F13 XY6YCAl!~C. $. +.~f1V{ ' ?~ „,.;, iTf Y~+IW~~14'~OJ~,HIfK1D ~ 1 ,~ ~,~ t t~ ~ i"~fAYCI. _ f 1(yiI~SSAl114~'M ~ ~ ~ •+~' .... aRT~#SNA,LSSEFiVE ~' ~'r8?Elt~t`CYRk~ii4#i[#~ikY _ i [i Y ~T J 4 ~C7 p t["i l~ T ~ ~ - i~1M7~FM iDfMMR~ x.12 h,~~~?i ~ ~, N gQ Pi 1iWP'7MMf~ CSC34 Ci~1[f .4. L i +,~ 1t.q T[a!lh4,€. ... ~, .~~~r _.__..... M _ C7 H ~ U r M r ~ I W r _.O O r ~ __-. r O O ~ + O O O O o r r * - - ~ 0 0 Q .a ., N on N rl ~ `~ ti ~ -.-.-. .-_.-- ° ° `O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 O m m m m 0 0 0 0 O Yti,. U 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° ° 0 0 '~ b a s h U _ _ _ i ~ ~ O o o t - - - _ _ _ ~ ° 0 0 0 0 ti ~ oo O o 0 N O v o rn n ° N ~ ~ r r ~ r r ~y r r - - - - : - - - - + ' ' ^^.,~ N N o o ° °0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 C N ° r~ ~i n V N N O ~\ ~ 1 1 1 r r Yy ~ 1 I ~ ~ ___ 1 1 ± O O O O ~ - - - - - - ~ r _, ~ 00 C 0 0 0 0 O O O O • ~ n ~ O O ti ~ O O O O `~ O O n O o O O~ r 0 0 Q' .y ~ N o 0 N m N N ~ r _~___ r ____ ' 4 - _ -+ + 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 r O O b b ,ry O r 0 O 0 0 r r O 0 0 N ~\ O ° b N r 0 0 ' ti O 0 v 1 N N N ti N N 1r ~, ~ r ~ ~ .-___ __-__ r - 0 0 0 - ~ ~ o 0 o0 0 o r o 0 0 0 O 0 0 r 0 O O ` ry n r O O O A 6) 0 0 0 0 0 0 - N n r u°i v°i n rv r i o ~ o v o i 1 N ' ' ~y •V ~ . V N H N Or N A rl ° 'i ~ 0 O N ~~ ~ ~ w 3 0 0 W 3 z H .qC a oG U H~ W; a u H~ e }~ ~ + r a _+ _ - M~1 r1 Sr q m ~ O ~ o ~.. ~ m ~u z as r m O A ~ O „ ~ T b '~ H ~ Or r~i m w (-r a ~S N N u ~ rCN aao~ C~ ~ m O ~°~~Z~z ~m.+W o H o o U w ,~ o ~ a w ° ~ ~ t g a n ~ o ~ z o zW W~ ~ ^ ~ ~ ~ W ( 4 r V o a H .7 fk i U o a W do ~ ~I ~ U f+ U r O~ A r N b re ' rrTT,, "" i~ ^ o n rl N n m .-. r n r ~ .+ ri ~ o r rn i ~ .~ a F. ~ ~' .. .. T, , ~" .. .. ~' F a -- v1 N ... i O V g O F r O U g 0 ~ a H H U m r a H H V tq r N~ rrrl i~l ~~~^ ~Ylll V O `/ ry `~ V O ~~ '~ 0 •~ W r"M ~~~ i w ~ O a r H y V p O ~ W O O r q H ~ r z o H 1 ~ F ,N~~ d a ra-r H H H N W r H q 4 r ~ -~~_-~ ; 1 0 0 0 0 ~ O ~ 0 a o r .+ o .a n rn o r N T r ~ _~-; ~ 0 0 0 0 oN ry tD O .+ N a ~ - _ . _ _ - 0 0 o O a° 0 0 m N N O O O O { -- - } O O O O ~ ___~~ ; 1 0 0 0 0 1 O 00 O O i O O O O O O ~ O N O i m n V r + 0 0 0 0 - a + - - - - - - + x 0 0 0 0 r O O O 00 r O O O b r ~ o0 0 0 0 0 00 o ~ o r < b r N n T .-1 b O O ~ W ~ O O rq5 8 ~ r w K U F w W t - - t pppppp~~~~~~ T r-1 i~ V a b~ O 0o F F H 4 o a a rv p m ~~~WWWN F r O o ~ ~ U' O i O r P: O WZ W i ~ U o 0. F ri W ~ ~ - - _ - - y r N Or O r r o .- o ~ o {-r r .~ O U T DWG .1 W ~.. M ~ O V H ~ H i W H U N ~ EXISTING STANDARDS AND REGULATIONS THAT AFFECT ' TRANSPORTATION & LAND-USE I R OANOKE COUNTY • Public Street and Parking Design Standards and Specifccations -Section 200.00: Street and Off-Street Design Standards ~' ' 200.05 Fronta e on Arterial Road Whenever a Subdivision (residential/commercial) abuts a road which is inclined in the Stag System of Primary Highways or a road designated as "Arterial" in the adopted Roanoke County Transportation Plan, or the latest Statewide Highway Plan, the following conditions shall be met. ' A. A reverse frontage and/or combined access. concept shall be utilized such that no lot has exclusive access to the arterial or primary highway; and in ' addition, all developments shall provide sufficient building, parking and travelway setbacks to permit the construction of the ultimate highway section. ' B. If reverse frontage or combined access cannot be provided, the site shall be limited to one ' exclusive access point. 200.06 Driveway Connections I It is the intent of this Manual that access be provided to individual residential lots only from streets classified as local and minor collector as defined in the ' Virginia Department of Transportation's Subdivision Street Requirements. A reverse frontage or service drive concept is required for streets which: A. Carry in excess of five thousand five hundred vehicles per day (5,500 vpd) and/or are categorized as primary highway; or ' B. The Roanoke County Transportation Plan indicates will carry in excess of five thousand five hundred ' vehicles per day (5,500 vpd). If the Director finds that a street carries in excess of three thousand vehicles per day (3,000 vpd), he may require a traffic impact study by a licensed Engineer to evaluate potential problems and to recommend corrective measures. VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION • Minimum Standards of Entrances To State Highways -Traffic Engineering Division • Subdivision Street Requirements • Road and Bridge Standards • Drainage Manual -Location and Design Division • Land Use Permit Manual -Maintenance Division i~ ct O ' O N N i~ O ..~ .,~.y O O O U ~r-~ C~ . ^~ A b.A 1 d y GA ~-+ v~ ~--+ 01 N I~ M ~ ~ M M d' ~ vl O~ \p M O M M O M O pp pp ~ . ~ U 0 ° °o °o °0 0 0 o o ~ ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' N M M M ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ri ~ V~ ~ `O ~O `O c~ ~' ~ •--~ N r-. l~ N 01 M N Q\ ~ ~ O N •-+ .--~ N ~ ~. ~ M ~ ~ ~ ~' -+ ~' O ~t O d' . -+ ~' \O ~ N Op ,-r ,--~ N Gl ~ ,-~ O C\ M O ~ ~ p~ r-I ~ M [~ M ~n M N M N M O ~' O 00 ~' ~ ~ N O ~ N Q~ ~ M M d' M d' M N M •-, M 00 M '+"' ~ O ~-~ N ~ O 00 O ~ '--~ ~ N ~ O O O O O O a b ",~O/ O /^~ ~ ~ ~ M ~ ~ ~ 'tS ~/ ,, H ~ ~ ~ r... -- ~ N ~'' N O ~ _ ~ ~ "d ~ r"", O . ~ ~ ~ p (s, ~ O ~ ~ . r, O U p/,.r ~ ~ x ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ O GZr ~. ~ N O _ ~O ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ Q ~ Q ~ ~ ro ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ x ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ `~ a .~ r--i mot' i~ O O e~ -F~+ O a~ D ~--i CAS .~ O O it -~.~ ~O V U ~--i .'.r CtS A wo c~ a~ ~ ~--~ ~O oo ~"'~ [~ O O „~ l~ N N N M •--~ ~--' U ~ °o °o ° o °o O 0 ~ 0 °~ 0 ~ 0 o ~ ~ ~ c~ c~ O, ~, V~ ~ O O I~ \O I~ ~O M ~ 00 O~ 00 01 ~' G1 N O M N M N ~ N `"'' .-~ ^'" ~-' ~. ~ N N N N N N N CC ~ OHO .M-~ ,--~ ~n V~ N d' ~t M `O Q1 ~ [~ O ~ U r~-+ eM'~ o°OO ono oho oho a\ ~ ~ . c~ a~ ~"~ ono ~ ~ dam- ono ~ ~ ~ G~ .-~ [~ ~t M ~O O ~n ONO O N ~ ~D O .-~ ~ ~~..~ pNp •--~ pp l~ ~ t~ ~ M 00 ~J 00 O O\ ~ '--~ O ~ N ~ O N ~ ~ o0 O 00 ~ ~D ~ N 00 N 00 ~ 00 -ate bA O ~ O ~ ~ ~ N ~ O O O O O O O a N ~ Q ~-+ Q N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "C7 ~ `p .^d .-~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i E"~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ b O ~ ~ ~ + ~ ~ + ~ ~ ~ O ° ~ O ° ~ ° bn ~ O 0 b ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ,a ~ p ~ ~ c~ 0 C7 ..~ ~. ~, ~ b ~ (~ n Q ~ _ ~ N ~ ^ ~ -ti ~ p ,-. ~ ~ ,--~ ° °° ~ ~ °? o ~ ~ Q 0 ~ ~ 3 ~ G~ ~ ~ ~~°, ~ a ~ o ~ o ° ~' o ~ o W t~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~. ~, ~ ~, .~ ~ ~ Accident Information for Colonial Avenue From Route 687 (Penn Forest Bo ulevard) to Roanoke City Limits Accident Information Collected for the Years 1995, 1996, 1997 and 1998 ' 71 Length of Segment In Miles: 1.88 Total Accidents: Accident Rate: 350 Injury Rate: 113 Fatal Accidents: 0 Persons Killed: 0 ' Pro e Dama e Accidents: 53 p rty g Amount of Property Damage: $301,355 Conditions ' - 51 of the 71 accidents occurred on dry s 57 of the 71 accidents occurred during surface conditions daylight hours d d i id 23 of the 71 accidents occurred during ng ents occurre ur - 34 of the 71 acc cloudy weather conditions clear weather conditions 54 of the 71 accidents were attributed tt ti i t d i - Accidents where distributed evenly hout the four year period throu en on ver na r o g - 58 of the 71 accidents occurred on a ~ 23 of the 71 accidents occurred during ' weekday the 3:00-6:00 pm peak travel period s 0 n L ~~ n J i ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2000 ORDINANCE 111400-10 TO VACATE AN EXISTING 15-FOOT DRAINAGE EASEMENT WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF DERBY DRIVE AS SHOWN AND CREATED ON SUBDIVISION PLAT OF TRIPLE CROWN ESTATES, SECTION 1, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 15, PAGE 131, AND LOCATED IN THE VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, by subdivision plat entitled `PLAT OF SECTION 1, TRIPLE CROWN ESTATES, BEING A SUBDIVISION FOR C & D BUILDERS, INC.', dated September 15, 1992, revised March 3, 1993, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Plat Book 15, page 131, afifteen-foot (15') drainage easement was created and shown within the proposed future extension for Derby Drive; and, WHEREAS, by `PLAT OF SECTION 3, TRIPLE CROWN ESTATES, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF 7.654 ACRES, PROPERTY OF C & D BUILDERS, INC.', dated June 23, 1997, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 20, page 85, the extension of Derby Drive was dedicated to the public and constructed for acceptance into the state secondary road system; and, WHEREAS, the 15' drainage easement no longer serves a public need and is no longer required, and vacation of this easement will eliminate any third party rights or encumbrances within the right-of-way; and, WHEREAS, the Petitioner, C & D Builders, Inc., has requested that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, vacate the existing 15' drainage easement, pursuant to §15.2-2272.2 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended); and, WHEREAS, this vacation will not involve any cost to the County, and County staff has field inspected the subject easement and determined that the requested vacation is acceptable; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by § 15.2-2204 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), and the first reading of this ordinance was held on October 24, 2000; the public hearing and second reading of this ordinance was held on November 14, 2000. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the existing 15' drainage easement, created and shown within the proposed future extension for Derby Drive on the `PLAT OF SECTION 1, TRIPLE CROWN ESTATES, BEING A SUBDIVISION FOR C & D BUILDERS, INC.', dated September 15, 1992, revised March 3, 1993, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 15, page 131, and shown hatched and designated as "15' DRAINAGE EASEMENT TO BE VACATED" on Exhibit A attached hereto, said easement being now located within Section 3, Triple Crown Estates (Plat Book 20, page 85), in the Vinton Magisterial District of Roanoke County, Virginia, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to § 15.2-2272 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), subject to the conditions contained herein. 2. That all costs and expenses associated herewith, including but not limited to publication, survey and recordation costs, shall be the responsibility of the Petitioner. 3. That the County Administrator, or an Assistant County Administrator, is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish the provisions of this ordinance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 4. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption, and a certified copy of this ordinance shall be recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in accordance with §15.2-2272.2 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended). On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara 2 NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~. i Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Terry Harrington, County Planner John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Valuation Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney ~ ~ , • ,~o ~o .4 ~e- ~y ~~ R~gke ~O ~,~~ { . 4~ ~~ P ~`~ SITE ~ ` ~e~~ _c~ ~o cam" ~, s~ ~° VICINITY ,MAP' ....~. `~. •., ~ I' . '?~ C J ~ N O .~'~ ~~ ~` N ~ ~ ~ ~. ~, •,~ ~ ~ \ ,.Q ~ ~'~; .2 l ~ .,gyp ~ ~P ~~~~' ~ l ' s' 4' ~ `la ~ ~ ~ ~ nn v~.• ~ ~ ~c. S ~" ~~ ~ ~ ~h \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'"~1 C ~8~ 15' DRAINAGE EASEMENT ~~ ~ .~;~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~` 6 : ~ TO BE VACATED ~..~.~, '~ ~ 9 ~ „~ ~. ~ DESCRIPTION: ; ~~~~ ~-~ N '"1 I A 15 Drainage Easement (P.B. 15, PG. 131) within the boundaries of Derby Drive. ~,1 . ---'-- __._-'........~~'.4.. . ROANOKE COUNTY 15' DRAINAGE EASEMENT TO • IIEPARTAd~'NT OF ~ BE VACATED CO~.MUNIfiY DEVELOPMENT' TRIPLE CROWN ESTATES, SECTION 1 .. ~ r r ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER L...~ COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS ~~ This is the second reading of the proposed ordinance to vacate a 15' drainage easement (Plat Book 15, Page 131) within the boundaries of Derby Drive in Triple Crown Estates, Section 1. In June 1993, C & D Builders, Inc., dedicated a 15' drainage easement to the County of Roanoke by subdivision plat of Triple Crown Estates, Section 1, as recorded in the Clerk's office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Plat Book 15, Page 131. In order for the portion of Derby Drive to be accepted into the state secondary road system, the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) requires that the right-of- way be free and clear of any third party rights or encumbrances. This 15' drainage easement no longer serves public need and vacation of this easement eliminates any third party rights or encumbrances within the proposed VDOT right-of-way. (1) Adopt the proposed ordinance authorizing the County Administrator to execute the necessary documents to vacate the 15' drainage easement within the boundary of Derby Drive of Triple Crown Estates, Section 1. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF-THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 14, 2000 AGENDA ITEM: Ordinance to vacate a 15' drainage easement recorded in Plat Book 15, Page 131, within the boundary of Derby Drive in Triple Crown Estates, Section 1, and located in the Vinton Magisterial District. 1 ~.~ --~ (2) Decline to adopt the proposed ordinance, which would result in the portion of Derby Drive remaining a private road. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Roanoke County staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt the proposed ordinance as provided in Alternative 1. S~JBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: Arnold Covey, Director ' Department of Community Development ACTION Approved ()Motion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) c: Paul Mahoney, County Attorney ~~~~ / 7 Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator VOTE No Yes Abs Church Johnson McNamara Minnix Nickens 2 + \ S,O ~~O ., ~ ~ • fie. \~ ~~ ~ i ~~~ R,FF ~ RAF ' co ~~ ,(/p/~o,~~ ~w SITE 'p ~ ~Q~ / Q~ p~'~ ~,OG O ~ J~" S~ ~° VICINITY ~AP~ ~- .o o ~- ~ ~ ` ti` ~ i ~ ~~' Oho ~ N o, i~ l ~? ~~ C ~ ~.~ ~/ , \~ Q3 ~ ~ y, .~4, / ~ S , ,~-- o~ ~~ ~.~`~ \, :~ ~ ,p~,'~~i! ~ ~~~ 15' DRAINAGE EASEMENT o; ~ ~,~ ~ ~ ~ '~` 6 TO BE VACATED ~ °~ , ~ ~ r ., .. ~~_ ~ ~ ~ ~ N'OT ~i /~ ~ ~ ~ 1 DESCRIPTION: ; r,' ~~ .-t~ ~ A 15' Drainage Easement {P.B. 15, PG. 131) within +' 1 !~, the boundaries of Derby Drive. ' ~ ~ - ~`? ~ 15' DRAINAGE EASEMENT TO RCTANOKE CDUNTI' BE VACATED ~EFART%ENfi 0~' eQ~IM£TNITY 11EYELOPMENT TRIPLE CROWN ESTATES, SECTION 1 ~ ..~ ..» ~, AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2000 ORDINANCE TO VACATE AN EXISTING 15-FOOT DRAINAGE EASEMENT WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF DERBY DRIVE AS SHOWN AND CREATED ON SUBDIVISION PLAT OF TRIPLE CROWN ESTATES, SECTION 1, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 15, PAGE 131, AND LOCATED IN THE VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, by subdivision plat entitled `PLAT OF SECTION 1, TRIPLE CROWN ESTATES, BEING A SUBDIVISION FOR C & D BUILDERS, INC.', dated September 15, 1992, revised March 3, 1993, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Plat Book 15, page 131, afifteen-foot (15') drainage easement was created and shown within the proposed future extension for Derby Drive; and, WHEREAS, by `PLAT OF SECTION 3, TRIPLE CROWN ESTATES, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF 7.654 ACRES, PROPERTY OF C & D BUILDERS, INC.', dated June 23, 1997, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 20, page 85, the extension of Derby Drive was dedicated to the public and constructed for acceptance into the state secondary road system; and, WHEREAS, the 15' drainage easement no longer serves a public need and is no longer required, and vacation ofthis easement will eliminate any third party rights or encumbrances within the right-of--way; and, WHEREAS, the Petitioner, C & D Builders, Inc., has requested that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, vacate the existing 15' drainage easement, pursuant to § 15.2-2272.2 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended); and, WHEREAS, this vacation will not involve any cost to the County, and County staff has field inspected the subject easement and determined that the requested vacation is acceptable; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by § 15.2-2204 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), and the first reading ofthis ordinance was held on October 24, 2000; the public hearing and second reading ofthis ordinance was held on November 14, 2000. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: _.: ~~ 1. That the existing 15' drainage easement, created and shown within the proposed future extension for Derby Drive on the `PLAT OF SECTION 1, TRIPLE CROWN ESTATES, BEING A SUBDIVISION FOR C & D BUILDERS, INC.', dated September 15, 1992, revised March 3, 1993, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 15, page 131, and shown hatched and designated as "15' DRAINAGE EASEMENT TO BE VACATED" on Exhibit A attached hereto, said easement being now located within Section 3, Triple Crown Estates (Plat Book 20, page 85), in the Vinton Magisterial District of Roanoke County, Virginia, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to § 15.2-2272 ofthe Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), subject to the conditions contained herein. 2. That all costs and expenses associated herewith, including but not limited to publication, survey and recordation costs, shall be the responsibility of the Petitioner. 3. That the County Administrator, or an Assistant County Administrator, is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish the provisions of this ordinance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 4. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption, and a certified copy of this ordinance shall be recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in accordance with § 15.2-2272.2 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended). G\ATTORNEY\VLH\AGENDA\Vacate\TripleCrown.CBcDBuilders.v/ppd 2 ,~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2000 ORDINANCE 111400-11 AUTHORIZING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF AN EXISTING 20-FOOT WATER LINE EASEMENT AND A PORTION OF AN EXISTING 20' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE RELOCATED PORTIONS OF SAID 20' EASEMENTS ACROSS PARCEL 1B-1-A OF PETERS CREEK COMMERCIAL PARK (PLAT BOOK 22, PAGE 137; TAX MAP NO.37.08- 1-6.3) WHEREAS, by subdivision plat entitled `PLAT SHOWING NEW PARCELS "1 B-1-A" & "TRACT 2" BEING A RESUBDIVISION OF PARCEL "1 B-1" (P.B. 21 PG. 92) PETERS CREEK COMMERCIAL PARK,' dated November 1, 1999, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Plat Book 22, page 137, a "NEW 20' WATERLINE EASEMENT" and a "NEW 20' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT" were dedicated and shown across Parcel "1 B-1-A", said parcel being designated upon the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map No. 37.08-1-6.3; and, WHEREAS, the Petitioner, The Branch Family, LLC, is the owner of Parcel "1 B-1-A", Peters Creek Commercial Park; and, WHEREAS, due to the location of a concrete pad with fuel tanks within the area of the above-described original easements, the water and sewer lines for Peters Creek Commercial Park were relocated by the Petitioner; and, WHEREAS, the Petitioner has requested that, pursuant to §15.2-2272.2 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, vacate the affected portions of the existing 20' water line easement and 20' sanitary sewer easement, and accept in exchange a new 20' public water line easement and a new 20' sanitary sewer easement across Parcel "1 B-1-A", Peters Creek Commercial Park; and, WHEREAS, this vacation will not involve any cost to the County and the affected County departments have raised no objection; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by § 15.2-2204 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), and the first reading of this ordinance was held on October i~ 24, 2000; the public hearing and second reading of this ordinance was held on November 14, 2000. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That portions of the existing 20' water line easement and 20' sanitary sewer easement on Parcel "1 B-1-A", Peters Creek Commercial Park (Tax Map No. 37.08-1-6.3), dedicated by `PLAT SHOWING NEW PARCELS "1B-1-A" & "TRACT 2" BEING A RESUBDIVISION OF PARCEL "1 B-1" (P.B. 21 PG. 92) PETERS CREEK COMMERCIAL PARK,' dated November 1, 1999, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 22, page 137, and being shown cross-hatched and designated as "EXIST. PUBLIC WATER LINE ESMT. TO BE VACATED" and "EXIST. PUBLIC SAN. SEWER ESMT. TO BE VACATED" on `Plat Showing New 20' Waterline Easement & New 20' Sanitary Sewer Easement', dated July 11, 2000, attached hereto as Exhibit A, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to § 15.2-2272 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), subject to the conditions contained herein. 2. That, in exchange, acquisition and acceptance of a new 20' water line easement and a new 20' sanitary sewer easement across Parcel "1 B-1-A", Peters Creek Commercial Park (Tax Map No. 37.08-1-6.3), being designated and shown as "CL NEW 20' PUBLIC WATERLINE ESMT." AND "CL NEW SAN. SEWER ESMT. TO BE DEDICATED" on Exhibit A attached hereto, be and hereby is, authorized and approved; and, 3. That all costs and expenses associated herewith, including but not limited to publication, survey and recordation costs, shall be the responsibility of the Petitioner. 4. That the County Administrator, or an Assistant County Administrator, is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary 2 to accomplish the provisions of this ordinance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 5. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption, and a certified copy of this ordinance shall be recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in accordance with §15.2-2272.2 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended). On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: 'y'YL_a~..c_f. ~. ~. Mary H. Allen, CMC/AAE Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Terry Harrington, County Planner John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Valuation Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 3 ~ . • U r~ LJ DOGWOOD ACRES DR/YE (PRl~ATE ROAD) 1 N li0' 25' 00'.E [a7ST. IXiVG PAD 1M7H fUEZ TA/W5' E~7ST. P!/BL/C S4AC SE71fR ESI1T. TD L#' YACATID EXIST. PUBLIC N'A1ER LAVE E571IT. 1D BE' YACAIID N.fl. ~ SL. C7PAP7' TA/,/t37.07-1-1 D.B.11B6 PO~f.32 4'~ ~~ QS~ RA~NASE I~G1'Q'YAL A/R~t:YPT ~ 7M/l37.07-1-5 D.B.12B7 P~ lZ4 /LGt f17ZGfRALlI ~ TJN~I26.?0-6-31 O.B. 1117 P0:784 ~--~' 10' f0' + !0' ~ NE71' 2D' Pi/BL/C ~! $ IYAIERL/NE L371/T. nj _ Z-~ 1 AHEM' TO' PlILIC/C C.E ~ LD. L7/LLEN SM: SEMfR ESUT. 7Mr[37.Gt8-1-7 r D.L~ 1371 P0.1171 EX/STING PARCEL 'YB-1 A' Z'- P.B.2~ P(n f37 PROPL7r7Y A~ 1HE BRANQ°! FAM/L Y, LLC ~ T , P.B 12 PIS 137 ~ £a9ST. PUBLIC 1rAlER LdYE E'5,11~ P.Q .~ ~ 1 I EO AREA ' H CROSS-HA T~ OENOTFS 7NAT PORITON OF EX/STIIWG SANITARY SEWER PARLI~Z 7A-1- p~~1 p~92 AND WA TE-RVNE EASEMENTS I Tt? BE ~ACA7ED. CENTERLINE OF NEW 20' WA 7ERUNE EASEMENT UNE BEAR/NG DISTANCE 1-2 S 81' 50' 36" E 63. f8' 2-3 S 36' 50' 58" E .217.15' 3-4 S 06' 09' 30 ` E 38 36' CENTERLNNE OF NEW 20' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT UNE BEAR/NG D/STANCE A-B S 81' 50' ,~6" E 71.96' B-C S 36' 50' 58" E 250.00' N07E5.' 1. THE 1N7ENT ~ 7HIS PLAT /S TO SHOW THE RELOCAAGW Ot~' E1~OSANG WATERLINE AND SANITARY SEME74 EASEMEN75 AS REGYa40ED /N P.~ ?Z P~ 137. 2 7f/1S P1AT WAS PREPARED M/THOYJT 7HE BENEFIT OF A ARE REP(k7T ANO 7HL7rE MAY EXIST. EASEMENTS NOT SNOMN HEREGN. .~ 1N/S PLAT DOES NOT REPRESENT A BOUNDARY SURVEY Of 7NE PROPERTY. 4l EXISANG 2O' SANITARY SE71£R AND WATERLINE EASEMENTS IO BE ~ACAIED BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT. PLAT SHOWING NEW ,20' WATERLINE EASEMENT & NEW 20' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT LOCATED ON PARCEL. "1B-1-A" (P.B. 22, PG. 137) BEING GRANTED TD COUNTY OF ROANOIfE BY THE BRANCH FAMIlY, LLC S/7UA TED /N PETERS CREEK COMMERC/AL PARK HOLUNS MAG/STER/AL D/STR/CT ROANOKE COUNTY, 1~IRG/NIA DATE: Duly ~ ~, 2000 LUMSDEN ASSOCIATES, P.C. SCALE: 1" ~ goo' ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS-PLANNERS ROANOKE, VIRGINIA COMM. NO., g3-71 46Cr1 BRAMBIETON AVENUE PHONE (540) 774.4411 CADD FILE, P.O. BOX 20669 FAX (540) 772-9445 F:\83\930x1\Garter\Eamtplet2dwp ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018 E-MAIL LUMSDENPC®AOL.COM ~IBIT A ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~ -~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 14, 2000 AGENDA ITEM: Second Reading of an Ordinance Authorizing the Vacation of a Portion of an Existing 20-Foot Water Line Easement and a Portion of an Existing 20' Sanitary Sewer Easement and Acceptance of the Relocated Portions of Said 20' Easements Across Parcel 1B-1-A of Peters Creek Commercial Park (Plat Book 22, Page 137; Tax Map No. 37.08-1-6.3) in the Hollins Magisterial District COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Petitioner, The Branch Family, LLC, is the developer of Peters Creek Commercial Park in the Hollins Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke. By resubdivision plat recorded in the Clerk's Office in Plat Book 22, page 137, a 20' waterline easement and a 20' sanitary sewer easement were dedicated to the County across Parcel "1B-1-A", designated on the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map No. 37.08-1-6.3. A concrete dumpster pad with fuel tanks was constructed within the dedicated easement areas. The developer relocated the water and sewer lines and proposes to convey new 20' water and sanitary sewer easements, encompassing the relocated lines, to the County. The Branch Family, LLC, has also requested that the former portions of water and sewer easements be vacated as shown on Exhibit A attached hereto. County staff concurs in the Developer's request. FISCAL IMPACT: All costs associated with the adjustment of these easements will be the responsibility of the Petitioner. L.i - t~ STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of the attached ordinance to vacate the cross-hatched portion of the existing 20' water line easement and of the existing 20' sanitary sewer easement as shown on the attached Exhibit A and to authorize acceptance of the relocated portions of said 20' easements across Parcel 1B-1-A of Peters Creek Commercial Park (Plat Book 22, Page 137; Tax Map No. 37.08-1- 6.3) as shown on Exhibit A. tted by: Approved: ~.~~ ~ O. Arno d Covey Elmer C. Hodge Director of Community Develop dent County Administrator ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by: ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Church Johnson McNamara Minnix Nickens 2 DOGWOOD ACfIE3 OR/YE (PR/SATE ROAD) ~~ ~Q~~C Ii3~7aiRNAL A/~0'CYPT (AN 7Al,{37.07-1-5 D.B 1267 P~ )24 w.h: ~ Sc. crrAFr TA/f31.07 1-f ~B.I7B6 Prn432 N 60' 25' 00' .E Eg5'T. tXiVG PAD Ulltl fL¢Z TAA7fS EaIST. P1/&/C SAN. SEMtR ESNT. 7D BE YACAIED EJIIST. PiiB[!C wAIER uvE Eswr. 10 BE YACAIID -10' tr,~,! a' /L6i t7TZ6E77A1D, ~ 7M~26.20-6-31 D.B.1117 PG:764 ~._ ~-10' f0' NEW 20' P!/Bl/C v ~ $ wA)ERUII~E' E51/T. ni Z~~ NEw 20' PUR[/C GE ~ LD GY/LLEIV SAN. Sf11E7P E3~VT. . IM/E37.OB 1-7 I D.~f37) P~1f71 EX/ST/NC ~ ' ~ PARCEL yB-1 A' z------ P.B.2~ PG. 137 PRGIAERTY C!'' IHE BRANAH FAM/L Y, LLC E71)5'T. P1/9L/C SAN. SEMtR ESNT. P.6f ZZ PG 137 ~ EMST. PUBLJC wA)E>? LavE Eswr. P.6t ZZ PCB 137 CROSS-HATCHED AREA DENOTES INA T POR770N OF PARGl~Z !A-1• EX/SUNG SAN/TARY SEWER RB.21 P~G92 AND WA TERUNE EASEMENTS • TO BE VACATED. CENTERL/NE OF NEW_20' WA 7ERL/NE EASEMENT UNE BEAR/NG D/STANCE 1-2 S 81' S0' 36" E 63.18' 2-3 S 36' 50' 58" E .217.15' 3-4 S 06' 09' 30' E 3836' CENTERLINE OF NEW 20' SAN/TARY SEWER EASEMENT UNE BEAR/NG DISTANCE A-B S 81' 50' 36" E 71.96' B-C S 36' 50' 58' E 250.00' NO)ES.' 1. THE /NTDVT OF IRIS PLAT /S TCl SNOW 7HE REZOCA110)N t7F EXISANG WATERLINE AND SANITARY SEWER EASEMENTS AS RECQ)QDED IN P.Et 2.z PG: 137. 2 1H/S PLOT WAS PREPARED INTHWT THE BENEFIT OF A 7171.E REPORT AND (HERE MAY EXIST. EASEMEN75 NOT 5NOM1Y HEREA'V. 3 IH/S PU1 T DOfS NOT REPRESENT A BOL/NOARY SURVEY OF 1HE PROPERTY. 4. EX/S11NG 20' SAN/TARY SE~NER ANO WA7ERUNE EitSEMEN78 7D BE YACA)ED BY SEPARATE /NSTRUMENT. PLA r sHOWINc NEAP 20' WATERLINE EASE~YIENT & NEW ZO' SANITARY SER'E'R EASEMENT LOCATED ON PARCEL "1B-1-A " (P.B. 22, PG 137) BE/NG GRANTED TO COUNTY OF ROANOKE' BY THE BRANCH FAMILY, LLC S/ZUATED /N PETERS CREEK COMMERC/AL PARK HOLUNS MAG/S7ETi'/AL D/S1R/CT ROANOKE COUNTY, I~lRG/N/A DATE: JUIy 11, 200o LUMSDEN ASSOCIATES, P.C. scALE: _ ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS-PLANNERS 1' 100 ROANOKE VIRGINIA COMM. NO.: > 93-71 4664 BRAMBLETON AVENUE PHONE (540) 774-4411 CADD FILE: P.O. BOX 20669 FAX (540) 772-9445 F:\B3\93071\Carter\Esmtplat2dwp ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018 E-MAIL LUMSDENPCQAOL.COM F~IBIT A ~~ '~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2000 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF AN EXISTING 20-FOOT WATER LINE EASEMENT AND A PORTION OF AN EXISTING 20' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE RELOCATED PORTIONS OF SAID 20'EASEMENTS ACROSS PARCEL 1B-1-A OF PETERS CREEK COMMERCIAL PARK (PLAT BOOK 22, PAGE 137; TAX MAP NO. 37.08-1-6.3) WHEREAS, by subdivision plat entitled `PLAT SHOWING NEW PARCELS "1B-1-A" & "TRACT 2" BEING A RESUBDIVISION OF PARCEL "1B-1 " (P.B. 21 PG. 92) PETERS CREEK COMMERCIAL PARK,' dated November 1, 1999, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Plat Book 22, page 137, a "NEW 20' WATERLINE EASEMENT" and a "NEW 20' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT" were dedicated and shown across Parcel "1 B-1-A", said parcel being designated upon the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map No. 37.08-1-6.3; and, WHEREAS, the Petitioner, The Branch Family, LLC, is the owner ofParcel "1 B-1-A",Peters Creek Commercial Park; and, WHEREAS, due to the location of a concrete pad with fuel tanks within the area of the above-described original easements, the water and sewer lines for Peters Creek Commercial Park were relocated by the Petitioner; and, WHEREAS, the Petitioner has requested that, pursuant to § 15.2-2272.2 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, vacate the affected portions of the existing 20' water line easement and 20' sanitary sewer easement, and accept in exchange a new 20' public water line easement and a new 20' sanitary sewer easement across Parcel "1B-1-A", Peters Creek Commercial Park; and, WHEREAS, this vacation will not involve any cost to the County and the affected County departments have raised no objection; and, ~.~-~.. WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by § 15.2-2204 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), and the first reading of this ordinance was held on October 24, 2000; the public hearing and second reading of this ordinance was held on November 14, 2000. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That portions of the existing 20' water line easement and 20' sanitary sewer easement on Parcel"1B-1-A",Peters Creek Commercial Park (Tax Map No.37.08-1-6.3), dedicated by `PLAT SHOWING NEW PARCELS "1B-1-A" & "TRACT 2" BEING A RESUBDIVISION OF PARCEL "1B-1" (P.B. 21 PG. 92) PETERS CREEK COMMERCIAL PARK,' dated November 1, 1999, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 22, page 137, and being shown cross-hatched and designated as "EXIST. PUBLIC WATER LINE ESMT. TO BE VACATED" and "EXIST. PUBLIC SAN. SEWER ESMT. TO BE VACATED" on `Plat Showing New 20' Waterline Easement & New 20' Sanitary Sewer Easement', dated July 11, 2000, attached hereto as Exhibit A, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to ~ 15.2-2272 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), subject to the conditions contained herein. 2. That, in exchange, acquisition and acceptance of a new 20' water line easement and anew 20' sanitary sewer easement across Parcel "1 B-1-A", Peters Creek Commercial Park (Tax Map No. 37.08-1-6.3), being designated and shown as "CL NEW 20' PUBLIC WATERLINE ESMT." AND "CL NEW SAN. SEWER ESMT. TO BE DEDICATED" on Exhibit A attached hereto, be and hereby is, authorized and approved; and, 3. That all costs and expenses associated herewith, including but not limited to publication, survey and recordation costs, shall be the responsibility of the Petitioner. 4. That the County Administrator, or an Assistant County Administrator, is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish the provisions of this ordinance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 2 L~ `- That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption, and a certified copy of this ordinance shall be recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in accordance with §15,2-2272.2 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended). G:\ATTORNEY\VLH\AGENDA\Vacate\PetersCrk Branch. ord.wpd OF ROANp~~ ti~~ is Z ~ 2 °v a~ rasa COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (540) 772-2004 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (540) 772-2193 November 15, 2000 Mr. Ricky L. Etter 8199 Ashton Lane Roanoke, VA 24019 Dear Mr. Etter BOARD OF SUPERVISORS JOSEPH McNAMARA, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX, VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT JOSEPH B. "BUTCH" CHURCH CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (540) 772-2005 Enclosed is a resolution of appreciation upon your retirement which was unanimously approved at the November 14, 2000 Board Meeting. On behalf of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County and its citizens, I wish to offer my appreciation for your many years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to the County. I am pleased to send you this resolution, and notification that Roanoke County has purchased a $100 Savings bond in recognition of your years of employment with the County. This bond will be forwarded to you from the Federal Reserve Bank at a later date. If you would like to have your resolution framed, please bring it to the Clerk's Office, at the Roanoke County Administration Building, 5204 Bernard Drive, at any time. It has been our experience that framed resolutions may be damaged when mailed. On behalf of each member of the Board and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept this Resolution and savings bond with our best wishes for a productive retirement and continued success in the future. Sincerely, II ,, ~~I/~ seph McNamara, Chairman oanoke County Board of Supervisors Attachment cc: Joseph Sgroi, Director, Human Resources Sheriff Gerald Holt (~~~n~~ ~~ ~~~z~~~.~ Internet E-Mail Internet E-Mail ®R.cycled Paper bos~www.co.roanoke.va.us ehodge ®www.co.roanoke.va.us o~ ROANp,~,~ ti '~ A Z ~, ~ z o~ a 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (540) 772-2004 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (540) 772-2193 November 15, 2000 Mr. Roger F. Robinson 2027 Montclair Drive Roanoke, VA 24019 Dear Mr. Robinson (540)772-2005 Enclosed is a resolution of appreciation upon your retirement which was unanimously approved at the November 14, 2000 Board Meeting. On behalf of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County and its citizens, I wish to offer my appreciation for your many years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to the County. I am pleased to send you this resolution, and notification that Roanoke County has purchased a $100 Savings bond in recognition of your years of employment with the County. This bond will be forwarded to you from the Federal Reserve Bank at a later date. If you would like to have your resolution framed, please bring it to the Clerk's Office, at the Roanoke County Administration Building, 5204 Bernard Drive, at any time. It has been our experience that framed resolutions may be damaged when mailed. On behalf of each member of the Board and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept this Resolution and savings bond with our best wishes for a productive retirement and continued success in the future. Sincerely, /~/(.~_ seph McNamara, Chairman oanoke County Board of Supervisors Attachment cc: Joseph Sgroi, Director, Human Resources Police Chief Ray Lavinder C~.~ixxrx~ a~ ~ ~~t~~C~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS JOSEPH McNAMARA, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX, VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT JOSEPH B. "BUTCH" CHURCH CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Internet E-Mail !nternet E-Mail ®Recyclad Peper bos~www.co.roanoke.va.us -•e 9 www.co.roanoke.va.us 11!GB.~2000 02:58 aT : l~ n ~o PHONE NUMBERS (AREA CQDE 540) FAX 89p-7588 PHONE IN MAIN OFFICE 890-3090 TO: ~,~+~C~t ~"~ ~~`Q ~ FROM: ~!b N0.024 D01 VCIBEG-5CHIFAX-FORM bJILLIGM BYRL~ HIGH SCHOOL ~ 97722193 y-!~~.!_~.~~ e~ r HD M tt"`~I~~~~L_ ~-°~ o v u ~~~ -~~:~ NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUQ+NG TNIS C(3VER SWEET; SPECIAL. INS~'RUCTIQNS: . 11f08i2©00 , ' 02:5$ WILLIAM BYRD HIGH SCHOOL ~ 97722193 N0.©24 D02 SKETCHES ~1N0 THOUSAND STia-~F Art Editor: Anna Woodie Layout Editor: lJ: is Roemer Assistant Art Editor: Becky Armstrong ~~` Assistant Layout Editor: Kevin Geor;e Art Advisor: Caral Conway ~. Art and r~ayout Cts~Pf: Amy Atkins, Laura v Caslner, Etin Gordon, Ashley 'Hartman, Aarvn Layman, Brad McConnell, Sarah Worley ,.: a[~r~-Mr ti:ii~~ ; '~ aE i ~ r s '... ~~~~~ ~~•~ri1 ra ' ~/ f Senior tephanie Bryant, Grey Junior X.~ ~~ ~ : Meghan Guilliams, Alis v, t~ 3essi W Sophomore Llrers[ure Editor: Adam Albertson ~ ~' p'ceshman Lite~ture Editors: Anthony Hale, Rebecca Medlin, Jake N'u[e. Tucker Stapleton Literature Advisor; Rebekah Woodie '~ - ~~J Literature Staff: Ashley AltizeY, A-rt't~ Ate, Lrati Carieon, Chris Aenney, Becca . Moore, Melanie Moses Special Copy Editor: Sara Ahait William Byrd ~EYigli Scholl Principal: l~r 't~ichard Turner 'Sketches Magazine Sketches Magazine ~'4~i(li~i~i~ i~~~~~c! (1i~1~ Scf~~-oi Page 1 of 1 Sketches is the art and literary magazine of William Byrd High School. It contains art work, poetry, short stories, essays, songs, and plays written by students in grades nine through twelve. It is produced by student art and literary editors, along with faculty sponsors from the English and Art departments. This award winning magazine has been published annually for the past 26 years. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • i • i • i • • • • i • • • • ~ [School Activities Back to ~` http://www.res.kl2.va.us/wbhs/Sketches.htm 11/08/2000 Brenda'Holton -Sketches recognition Page 1 From: Brenda Holton To: Mary Allen Date: 11 /7/00 12:17PM Subject: Sketches recognition Just finished talked with Carol Conway, co-sponsor. Rebecca Woodie is at a conference today but she talked with Carol yesterday. They want to come on Nov 14 and will get in touch with the staff. She is going to fax me a copy of the staff members -said that some were missing from the Vinton article. Explained what we would be doing and read of the information from the resolution and she was very appreciative of our recognizing them for this National award. BrerSua~Ht~lton - Re: Recognition for William Byrd HS Magazine Page 1 •-. , From: Mary Allen To: Brenda Holton Date: 10/20/00 3:43PM Subject: Re: Recognition for William Byrd HS Magazine I'll add to the November 14 or Dec. 5 agenda. We may want to include in Student Government Day recognition too. Mary H. Allen CMC Clerk to the Board County of Roanoke 540-772-2003 »> Brenda Holton 10/20/00 08:50AM »> Dr. Nickens called to say that he is sending us a copy of the Vinton Messenger. William Byrd High School Literary Magazine has won an aware for Best in the Nation, over 2,000 other magazines. He would like for them to be recognized at a future Board meeting much the same as we do for athletic teams. We usually get a copy but asked him to go ahead and send his copy to us so we would be sure and have one. Brenda J. Holton Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 540-772-2005 bholtonCa~co.roanoke.va.us CC: Diane Hyatt; Dwymer@res.k12.va.us ~~ w ~~o-j~~~ ~~,p ~,.k.~ a-v ~ G.~~P Y~ ~ ~ r M ~ r ,s 4 ~ v ti 4.1~~ ~ i x ti~ a5 ~~, r Staff members of Sketches 2000: (bottom, I to r) Alisha Shelton, Becca Moore, Amy Atkins, Adam Albertson, Anthony Hale, Jake Nute; (top, I to r) Rebecca Medlin, Laura Conner, Tucker Stapleton, Sarah Worley, Erin Gordon, Becky Armstrong, Anna iNoodie. MeB~~~-anoea~enwaike- rd literar ma azine 'ud ed B y ~ J g y the best of the best in nation By JEFF WALKER Staff Writer When Sketches, Volume 28, William Byrd High School's lit- erary magazine, began life last year, thoughts were not on awards or recognition. The staff was too busy making decisions on the publication's layout, going through hundreds of writing and art submissions, and raising money for the full- color cover. Everyone worked progres- sively towards the spring dead- line sothe souhgtafter magazine would be ready for the Culture Fair in April. "It's a tradition in the spring for each student to get a copy of Sketches," said co-advisor art teacher Cazol Conway. "Since they don't get their yearbooks until the summer, they get their Sketches signed. They even bring them back to reunions once they graduate," she said. Meanwhile, English teacher and the other Sketches advisor Rebecca Woodie prepared a copy of the freshly printed magazine to be sent off to the American Scholastic Jounralist evaluation service. The service is part of the American Scholastic Press As- sociation (ASPA) which cri- tiquesthousandsofstudentpub- licationseach year and rates them on layout, content and creativ- ity. William Byrd's Sketches has garnered first place three times with ASPA, in 1995, 1998 and 1999. It has also earned five first place and two second place awards by the Virginia High School League. Three weeks ago, Conway took an envelope home she had received from the ASPA. "I forgot all about it, until the next day," she said. "I opened it an immediately called Rebecca." Woodie said, "The phone doesn't normally ring at my house that early. I picked up the phone and Carol told me the news." The news from the evaluation service was that not only had Sketches won first place again, it was considered first of the first place winners. Volume 28 of Sketches was named "Most Outstanding High School Liteary-ArtMagazine for 2000.,, The publication also received "First Place with Merit." Judges against 2,000 other schools, William Byrd High School received perfect marks in two of the judging categories. "We got a perfect score for diversity in art and writing and for presentation," said Conway. "Our total score was 945 out of 1,000." The staff' s reaction to the win- ning news? "It was kind of hard to be- lieve," said Rebecca Medlin, a freshman literature editor last year. "It was fun. I didn't think much about winning. It shocked me." Jake Nute, also a freshman literature editor on the magazine said, "This magazine is the first thing that teachers have asked me to be a part of. Winning was a surprise. Tucker Stapleton agreed. "Having a role in something, so big and so good--it was just surprising," said Stapleton, now a sophomore. Awazds aside, one student said he didn't know that such a thing existed in which students had such a key role. Mark Armstrong, a freshman last year, saw a submission box in his English class and decided Continued on Page 2 aq of 6uuae~p ~a6e to s~ea~f $OOL'S6£ 1065 6TO6Z XA ~axoasog'm$ ''ang u°tsui1y10bIZ qaq ~0 000'04l$ to slunowe QPmlaS b-Oi • S-OT 'P3';uoy~ earn°g ~'G~Q S871S Ue01 UO JUA090e _, _.r~ ,.~,~, ,~ ~.- ~. ;na=~.~~._.:-.: iium to hot heat, melt butter, add ham minutes. Add halt-and-half and bring ere cheese and bring to a boil again. isk until cheese has melted and starts i macaroni and toss unti 1 coated well. sprinkle remaining cheese on top. hot. IN APPLE JUICE by Spinach with t Golden Raisins skin off) the fish) 3/4 c. apple juice Salt and pepper in flour and shake off excess i add oil, cook the rockfish until ce and bring it to a boil and then the rockfish is done, about 2-3 ess of your fish. Remove the fish ~g liquid until thick, season with 4 tsp. butter (unsalted) 6 Tbsp. golden raisins g enough to hold the spinach. Get let it burn. Add the pinenuts and then add the spinach, season with ch until it begins to wilt, about 2- ~ide the spinach among 4 plates. spinach and drizzle the apple juice CLAFOUTIS 5/8 c. sugar 1/2 c. Goat cheese (soft) Salt vith egg, butter and cheese. Sift with rest of ingredients. Divide on-stick pans or rings. You may. cake pans lined with parchm^ paper. Overlap slices of apple over the batter and sprinkle with sugar. You will use about 1/2 of an apple per clafoutis. Cook for about 20 to 25 minutes for individual rings (35-40 minutes for the springform pan) until brown on top. Serve with ice cream or whipped cream. Sketches Continued from Page 1 to try his hand a writing a poem. Once the poem, "Untitled," appeared in the finished book, Anmstrong said he "had awon- derfultime seeing in the finished publication." The other result, Armstrong said, is that seeing his work pub- lished spurred him on to write more poetry. "I filled up a whole notebook this summer. I've really found something I like to do," he said. Anna Woodie--no relation to the co-advisor-- who graduated last June was the art editor for Sketches 2000. She was pleased about the award, but the experi- ence on the magazine had other benefits for her. "Working on Sketches helped me to get a two teaz scholarship ~rovementplan that will cover to five years in the future. ut from citizens during the ,..,,,..:.., ...oo.:.,,,~ ,,,;n tiA to Virginia Western," she said. "Then I'll be transferring to UVA"where she plans on study- ing forensic pathology. The student staff of the liter- arymagazine makes all the deci- sions regarding layout and de- sign, and content, under the ad- vice of Conway and Woodie. Rather than thinking too much about the awazds as they begin work on Volume 29, the advi- sorssaid they do not want awards to be the guiding force. "You just go about your busi- ness and select the best work you can," said Woodie. Woodie said one of the main goals of Sketches is to. represent the work of as many students as possible. "We hope to keep the tradition going," she said. Please ~oin The Bedford County School Board & PTA, Students, Faculty & Staf f in the Dedication of GoodvieW Elementary School _ - i~'.. \ •w_.. .. Saturday • October Zest r Brenda Holton - c&h.ris.star.conditions.wpd Page 1 ---- _._ Added conditions for Roanoke Steam practices: 1. No other professional sports team would be allowed to practice at Rising Star other than the Roanoke Steam due to its uniqueness. 2. There would be no alcohol or profanity allowed. 3. No loud speakers permitted. 4. No buses would be allowed for transportation of the Roanoke Steam. 5. Use of the Rising Star facility would be within the operating hours of 9 a.m. to 10 p. m. 6. This would be one season limit for year 2001 only. ~ r 1 ...~~ Marv Allen -Fwd: Supervisors Agenda Item _ Page 1 From: Paul Mahoney To: Mary Allen Date: 10/27/00 4:27PM Subject: Fwd: Supervisors Agenda Item Mary: Please see attached message from Webster Day, Esq. requesting that this IDA resolution be placed on the next BOS' agenda (11/14). This communication and advice is provided to you within the scope of the attorney-client privilege,. and as such, it is confidential and is exempt from disclosure under the provisions of the Virginia Freedom of Information Act. Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Mary Allen -Supervisors Agenda Item Page 1 From: Webster Day <wday@wmtda.com> To: "'pmahoney@co.roanoke.va.us"' <pmahoney@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: 10/27/00 1:51 PM Subject: Supervisors Agenda Item I'm representing The Certified Medical Representatives Institute, Inc. in connection with bond financing through the IDA. After the IDA holds a public hearing on November 1, the matter will need to come before the Board for approval. Attached for your review is a draft resolution of the Board giving that approval. Please review it and give me your comments. Can we get this on the agenda for the Board's meeting in November? Thanks. Webster Day Wetherington, Melchionna, Terry, Day and Ammar 1100 BB&T Bank Building 310 First Street (24011) P.O. Box 90 Roanoke, VA 24002-0090 540-982-3800 Tel. 540-342-4480 Fax wday@wmtda.com CC: "Ed Natt (E-mail)" <enatt@ofnak.com> REPORT OF PUBLIC HEARING To: Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia A public hearing was conducted by the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia (the "Authority") at 10:00 a.m. on November 1, 2000, on the application of The Certified Medical Representatives Institute, Inc. (the "Company"), requesting the Authority to issue up to $3,000,000 of its revenue bonds to assist the Company in financing the acquisition, construction and equipping of an office facility. During the public hearing an opportunity was given to interested persons to present their views in connection with the proposed issuance of the bonds or the location and nature of the project. The public comments, if any, received at the meeting are summarized in Exhibit A attached hereto. After such hearing, the Authority adopted a resolution recommending the approval of the bonds by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. A copy of the resolution is attached hereto. Also attached hereto is a fiscal impact statement regarding the Project. Dated: November 1, 2000. mss '"~, Ur M, `°~1 ~~~~a r~~- '~-~^' '~'a . Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia By: - Chairman EXHIBIT B Summary, of the Comments Expressed at the Hearin The following public comments were expressed at the hearing: None G:\W P\DAY\021741 Report-PublicHearing.doc/snc RESOLUTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA RECOMMENDING PUBLIC APPROVAL OF BONDS WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia (the "Authority") has held a public hearing on the request of The Certified Medical Representatives Institute, Inc., a Virginia non-stock, non-profit corporation (the "Company") that the Authority issue its Revenue Bonds in an amount not to exceed $3,000,000 (the "Bonds"), in order to finance the acquisition, construction and equipment of an office facility (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, requires approval of the issuance of the Bonds by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA: 1. The Authority hereby approves the issuance of the Bonds, the proceeds of which will finance the Project for the benefit of the Company and recommends that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia approve the issuance of the Bonds. 2. The Chairman and Secretary of the Authority are hereby authorized and directed to forward to the Board of Supervisors a reasonably detailed summary of the comments, if any, made at the public hearing and a fiscal impact statement relating to the Project. 3. The approval of the Authority hereunder and its recommendation to the Board of Supervisors do not constitute an endorsement of the Bonds, the financial viability of the Project or the creditworthiness of the Company. 4. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. Adopted on November 1, 2000 ~~ ecretary, Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia \\WETHERINGTON\VOL 1\WP\DAY\021741 RecommendationResolution.doc/snc Fiscal Impact Statement INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA November 1, 2000 The Certified Medical Representatives Institute, Inc. Office Facility 1. Maximum amount of financing sought 2. Estimated taxable value of the facility's real property to be constructed in the municipality 3. Estimated real property tax per year using present tax rates 4. Estimated personal property tax per year using present tax rates 5. Estimated merchants' capital tax per year using present tax rates 6. a. Estimated dollar value per year of goods that will be purchased from Virginia companies within the locality b. Estimated dollar value per year of goods that will be purchased from non-Virginia companies within the locality c. Estimated dollar value per year of services that will be purchased from Virginia companies within the locality $3,000,000 $2,410,000 $27,2333* $16,800 N/A $500,000 $50,000 $500,000 1 d. Estimated dollar value per year of services that will $250,000 be purchased from non-Virginia companies within the locality 7. Estimated number of regular employees on year 20 round basis (excluding salaried employees) Average annual salary per employee $40,781 (excluding salaried employees) (Note: all are salaried) *CMRI is anon-profit entity, exempt from real and personal property taxes. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA By• hairman G:\WP\DAY\021741 Impact Statement.doc 2 Mary Allen - Re: Roanoke River greenway Page 1 From: Diane Hyatt To: Janet Scheid; Mary Allen Date: 11/6/00 5:24PM Subject: Re: Roanoke River greenway Mary's interpretation is right. Liz needs to tell Brent what to include in his report and then attend the worksession. »> Mary Allen 11/06/00 04:25PM »> My guess (and it is JUST a guess) is that she needs to get with Brent and make sure her request is included in the work session board report that Brent prepares, and then make sure she attends the work session. The actual requests for year-end $$ will be presented by Diane at the evening meeting. Again, I'm not sure either! I copied Diane Hyatt with this email so maybe she can provide more details! Mary »> Janet Scheid 11/06/00 04:11 PM »> Mary: Help. I'm confused. Last week Elmer told Liz she should ask the Board for some of the "year end" money for the Ro. Ri. greenway. She and Pete talked and decided what they needed and Liz thought she is suppose to write a board report requesting the money. But what I heard ECH say is it will just be a part of the budget worksession. Does she need to do a board report or not? Or does she just need to be at the worksession to talk about what she needs? Janet Scheid Senior Planner jscheidlq~co.roanoke.va.us 540/772-2094 NOV-06-2000 12:00 PM PLUMBING SPECIALISTISTS 540 387 3591 P. 01 November 9, 2000 Dear Brenda, Enclosed in this fax is same information to help with the Board of Supervisor's recognition of Alan May for being Warned to the All State Golf Team. I did not know exactly what you needed so I probably included too much in this fax. Use what you need and disregard the rest. I also included a cop; of a page from the GHS newsletter written by his coach and a copy of the program. from the Hall of Fame banquet . I have introduced people from. time to time for awards and I always found it helpful to have extra information. Therefore I have included some of his School and Community Activities as well as some addtitional golf achievements to he used if needed. We will plan to be at the Board meeting on November 14th at 7:00 PM.. If anything changes please let us know. Alan is honored that the Supervisors want to recognize him. Thank you for this honor. Sincerely, Terriann May 3$7-2479 Horne 387-2153 Work NOV-06-2000 12:01 PM PLUMBING SPECIALISTISTS 540 3S7 3591 P.i02 Alert May is a junior at (tlenvar High School, Ho !~ been on tha golf team for three yearn. His aaa~ch is Mr. Ao Hagen. He was named to the All I)iatrict Golf Team hi.s Freshman, Sophomore and Junior (detailed below) ycare. He was named to the All Regional Golf Team hie Sophomore and Junior (detailed belovr) years. He wan Homed to the All State Clolf Team his Junior y~ (detailed below). T~stricts: AIAn vv~c nt~mecl !n the All iistrict (elf Tean- in the Three Rivers T}istrirt nn September 25, 2000 at the District t}o1f Tournament at Great Qaka Country Club in Floyd Virginia. ba:auae ho raaticod 4th in tho reg~r acasun staxxiings. He was among two taeams and 6 individuals chosen to represent the Three Rivers District at the Regional Golf Tournampit. The Throe Rivers District is cemprised of ~ teams, Gleavar, R,adfard, Aulxnn, Floyd, Liles, sad Western Montgomery. Regionals; Alan was among 71 High School golfers from across the Region to compete in the Getup A Region C Golf Tournament. He was named to the All Regional C,olf Team in the Virginia High gchnnl League C_.rcxtp A Raglan C by +acaring 77 at Groat t'aeks Cuurlry Club in Floyd, Virgl~aia on October 2, 2004. From Region C, he wet the second place individual qualifier for the State Toumom~ent.. Rtate: Alan was arnc~ng two teams and 6 individuals to re~presernt Region C at Stag Toumame~nt hosted by Powell Valley High School at Lonesome Pines Country club in Hig Stone C}ap, Virginia. Seventy two golfers fiinri across the StatC competed in tha Virginia High School League runup A State Golf Cbampianships on October 9tlt and 14th. On October 9th the golfers wake to about 1 inch of snow an the graurrd and fi~igid temperatures. Tee tirtses were delayed until weather permitted. At the end of the first round Alan was in 8th place after shooting a 7'$. dctober lt')th brought ft+ost delays but by the end of the day Alga shot a 74. After two days he had $nished 3 shots froth the lead with a 152 and dad for 4th overall. He lost ~ sudden death playoff after two hnl~ to An#sh ,Sth #n the Starr and l+e nflmecl to the Virginia H#gh Schc~c~l T.eAgt~r. Croup A -All State Golf Team. Sterne (".nlf Honors: 1999 RVrA. (R.annoke Va11ey I',olf AsencsiahTon) Jtmior c'hsmpinn-this is a twu day summer junior tournamert held every suer 2000 Rounoke Valley Junior Fall of Fang Tr~cn-avb Mcl~llatnd's 1"irst Trim All Metro -The team is made up of the top 6 junior golflers fi+om Roanoke City, Roanoke Coucriy, Salem, FMnklin C.otmty, Ac+tetourt C.otmty based upon their toimnamet+t finishes for both school and tournament. finishes other than school The foam wan rcc~ognix~ci at tiro 2000 Rc-mwke Valley CfulP Association Hall of Fame Golf Banquet on November 2. NOw-06-2000 12:02 PM PLUMBING SPECIALISTISTS Alan May Finishes Tied for 4~'~ in State Golf The 2000 Varsity Cxolf Team of Russ Fatties, ~.eith Carrull, Sara Layman, Alan May, Greg Boadwilxe, Jonathan Parlter, Andy Addington, and Nathan May finished the Three Rivers regular season and the district tournament in 3"s lace. The regular season saw Alan pltlcc 4` o~eznll, Nathan 1. X~, Keith 1 S~', and Russ 1. $a'. The team was joined in practice by ~/`'' graders Justin Brown and Sean Fagan and looks forv~+ard'to their participation in the future, Alan May qualifed ibr the ltcgic~n C tournament from the regular season while Keith Carroll qualified from the district tournament. AIA~ wa.R named to both the All District and AlI Region Golf Yearns and. quali!"iact foi tlic Sltatc Group A Golf Tournament held at Lotlesomc Pine Gauntry Club in l3i.g Stone Crap Uct. 9 and 10. The morning of Octobrr 9 brought an inch of eaxly snow to Norton. Tee times ware delayed until weathrr perr~ittad pla~+. Alan toured the par 71 course in 78 and was tied. far 540 387 3591 P. 04 p.~ ~.b0o $"' after the &rst r~ruud. The second day o£ the tournament came with a hard frost that kept Alan off the course until noon. Alan unproved his score and position with a well plant'ted and executed 74 that brought hirn a tic far 4~' overall and the l+.onor of being named to the Group A - ,All State Golf Team. Congratulations to Alan Tula Kcitlt for their post season honors, and the entire team for art outstanding season. Alan wan named to tho Roanoke Va.liey Golf Hall of Fame Toarri. 1'vr more infornaat+an cheok out the wpb at 1~t :!,`wr~w.res>k 12.va; us/gllxs/Athletics/frames et,h . I BASKETBALL Qpen Gyms -Boys ba~altotba116:30-8:0(1 FM Monday and Wednesday thra November. Boy's Middle School, ~'r Varaltty, and Vrrrity ha.~ketball starts on November d, liJach student ~ athlete must have a VFiSL Physical form {available to male at'8ce) on the at G~'iS before this date. Practilce schedules will be announced once dates are contlrmed. Stadent-athletes must havepassed S classes last senateter. If any questions, call Goacl- Crotts At 3Ry-d536. Three R[vers District Tlclcpt Prices: (Same pace for Adults and Students) Football '54.00 ~asketbsli 53.00 Volleyball 53.40 Wrestl[ng $3.00 Spring 5parts X2.00 5 A$ON PA~#SES 3easan passes are available; ptoeoc. see Ms. Bonnie Binrnberg in the MIDDLE school oiflce to purchase them. Adults X60.04 Students 540.04 Senior Cltiaens FRi=E Season pass holders are admitted to .ail REGUU4R season hams-sporting events. ,~~~ NO'~l-06-2000 12:03 PM PLUMBING SPECIALISTISTS 540 387 3591 P. 05 w ~ ~ '~~ [irk i ~ I i i 1 c i; i w ~ o ~ ' ~ i"~; ~ ~' v ~ ~ :: .: '~ '~ ~ ~ W w ~ ~' O i ? 1 l i . , s i i i ,,. ~~ ~ ~~~~~ a V ~~ ,:~M.:~ ~; ',~, ,1," ,~~,:. ... ~,AC if9~~ ~$;a~ 5 f a f b~{ i ~eii 6~j i ~. ~~~~ ~,r ., , , . . ~ ~ _ '' Aye ~ I ~ ~~,~1 ~~~ N ,~ a gaaaacti,a a ~~ ~ ~[ ~. V ~ ~ r~y 4 ~ . 7 i ~ • r ~ ~ ~„ ~ >:. ~~ ~~ ~ ~.: i r„ ~' ' ~ ~ ~~ ~ .~. ::: i i i 3 `"~ i i i i i~~ s ~~ i i s t '1I1 ~~ ~ ~~~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ r~~ October 31, 2000 Information for Alan May resolution Information from Terriann, mother, home 387-2679. She will fax me more detailed information. Wants to attend 11-14 at 7 p.m. Use Alan May - no middle initial Junior at Glenvar High School He made All District Golf Team as freshman, sophomore, and junior. He made All Regional as sophomore and junior He made All State as junior. Only one from Roanoke County. Named by Roanoke Valley Golf Association to First Team Hall of Fame, 2000. Won Roanoke Valley Golf Association Junior Championship 1999. Need to know golf team record. Need to know Coach's name. ~ie`~ ~,'~,~' ~. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2000 RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS TO ALAN MAY FOR BEING NAMED TO ALL STATE GOLF TEAM WHEREAS, team sports are an important part of the curriculum at schools in Roanoke County, teaching cooperation, sportsmanship and athletic skill; and WHEREAS, Alan May, a student at Glenvar High School, had an outstanding season on the golf team; and WHEREAS, Alan demonstrated his outstanding athletic ability and good sportsmanship throughout the season; and WHEREAS, Alan was named to the All District Golf Team as a freshman, sophomore and junior; named to the All Regional Golf Team as a sophomore and junior; and was named to the All State Golf Team this year as a junior; and WHEREAS, Alan won the 1999 Junior Championship of the Roanoke Valley Golf Association and was named to their First Hall of Fame for 2000. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia does hereby extend its sincere congratulations to ALAN MAY for being named to the All State Golf Team; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors extends its best wishes to Alan May in all of his future endeavors. NO'~l-06-200© 12:01 PM PLUMBING SPECIALISTISTS S40 3c37 3591 P. 03 School Acdvites: Mentor Natural Holpar Key Club Officer Pcllowe~ip of Chrietiari A~letes Prosi~eent Elect of the National Honor Society Maintains a~_ (3rsde Avera~ Community: Member of hie church's Youth Council Participated in Swmmet Niisaioa Trlpa fbr the Past two summara- Practices coif at least 4 times a weeit year rouad Past High School Ambitiotu~: attend college and Play college gulf Fax to: Joe McNamara From: Mary Allen Date: October 13, 2000 RE: Industrial Development Authority Attached is the application from Linwood Windley that we discussed at the Board meeting. J. Richard Cranwell never did call me back, so I am going to contact Mr. Windley and see if he is still interested in serving. If he is, you can appoint him at the October 24 meeting and his confirmation will be on the November 14 agenda. ii - ~ ~ Note to: Joe McNamara From: Mary Allen Date: September 22, 2000 Attached is a Citizen Volunteer Application from Linwood P. Windley who is interested in serving on the Industrial Development Authority. The current term of J. Richard Cranwell who lives in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District will expire on September 26. You may wish to reappoint Mr. Cranwell, but wanted you to have this information before the meeting. 2 CO OF R OANOKE CITIZEN VOL LINTEER APPLICATION la51RT 0 T}2 YilE iQ.~ The following biographical information has been requested by the Roanoke County Board o f Supervisors on each nominee for Board appointment to Committees, Commission and Boards. When com- pleted, please return to Mary H. Allen, C/O Roanoke Coa~nt; Board o f S~i~pervisors, P. O. Box 29800, Roanoke, Va. 24018. I am interested in serving Roanoke County as a member of: n cjvb~~, ~ Name: Magisterial District: Home Address: Zl y9 C~,~,,~~- ~b,;~ ,fir Length of Time at present address: y ,~P r Telephone Number: ~~ fro) 7 7 ~ - 5~ 6 8' SvuSi SCLtull~' v iiliiu@i: 0015 ~ 70~ ' s y 3 q Present Employment Position: C. P. A . Business Address: row„ { ~'olwG~.l~ ~ Cow ~D ,~K ,t~ a ~£~ Business Telephone Number: ~Yo) 3~.~- D9~~ Education. avic activities, offices held, honors, etc.: Availability of time to devote to this committee: J ~'~ {~o~rs ~r MOn~ List special items which might qualify you for this appointment: 1.99r Cc n.~ ~nee`L °L1~ C'~+S l t~J,, ~.rt,7~ Cn r Onr u~r ~n~ M uin,. , Ic ~ Gl/ cI`~f -, - - (Please attach any additional information you wish to include) Signature Mary Allen - Re: Work Session with Schools - 6 yr. plan Page 1 . "1" From: Elmer Hodge To: Mary Allen Date: 10/26/00 9:56AM Subject: Re: Work Session with Schools - 6 yr. plan OK for 5:00 Elmer Hodge Roanoke County Administrator 540-772-2001 Mary Allen -Work Session with Schools - 6 yr. plan Page 1 - w. From: Mary Allen To: Elmer Hodge Date: 10/26/00 9:52AM Subject: Work Session with Schools - 6 yr. plan Darlene from Dr. Weber's office called. They would like to tell the 6yr Plan Committee what time to come to the work session on Nov. 14. We usually tell them 5:00 p.m. Is that O.K.? Mary Allen art a an 10/30/2000 9~ Oct. 30, 200 The Roanoke Times Acct:5403428928G1JND Name: GUNDIFF DRUG STORE Ph: 5403428928 Class Rate: Disp Rate: 116 POLLARD ST Credit Status: LM VINTON VA 24179 Reply Request A Paytype BL Rate LE Legals Rep: 37 Source FX Class 10 Legals ~ TFN Start 10/31/00 Days 2 Rate Is' 2 Stop 1117/00 o.oo Words..... . 138 Price 1 o.oo Lines...... . 36 Discount 0 0o Depth..... 36.00 Commis Calumns.. 1 Net 1 o.oo Graphic... . 0 St Tax 0.00 St Words. 0 Fed Tax Free Day 0 ^ Boxed Ad Total 1 Payment Copy Line C&D Bl drs App Cr. Sort String Balance H ld O n o Product Co Tear S heets ^ Ad Killed PO # C&D Comments R eason for Discount LEGAL NC11CE Notbe is hereby siren #o all in#ereale~ peraana that the Roanoke County Board of 6upervixn will hold a publio hearinsat their 7:60 p.m. xs- 91on on Stie3tlal+, Naverc~Dler 14, 2000 in the Bvad Meeting Rwm at the F'~anvke County AdminE3tratbn Censer, 7204 barred Drlx S.W. on the patl• tlon OT CAP Esulk~rstot9cate a 16 foal tlralnase easement raCO tdatl In Plat fi001[ 1.5, Pia 131, Wi#hin Oho boundary of Darcy DrMa In TNpla Gown Eabtas, 5ac`.bn 1, and bcatad I r the Vinton Magic#ar ial D elflat. 43 2$ A Dopy at tho doaumanta rala6ad #a then roquaat may ba ~ 00 e:mmined in the offbe at the . Cepartment of nommunlty 0 00 Dexiopment, boated at the . Roanoke Cau nky Adm in e>Mrat b n 43.28 Cenkr Q. 00 o r,~e n unarm my nano to ~ 2 4tn dalr vF Ctlvber, 2004. Mary H. Allen, CM C, 0.00 Clerk tD me Bcab 43.28 Pnanoloo Dounty ®oard of supe msas O' ~0 I134 SS4$1 0.00 0.00 Mary Allen Editions DC, Ad id: 154534 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, November 14, 2000, at 7:00 p.m. at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke County, Virginia, on the petition of DePaul Family Services, Inc. ("DePaul") to adopt a resolution supporting its request to the Virginia General Assembly to exempt from taxation certain property owned by DePaul and situate in the County of Roanoke. The assessed value of the property owned by DePaul Family Services, Inc. in the County of Roanoke is $759,900. Real estate taxes for the current fiscal year, should the exemption not be granted, would total $8,586. Citizens are welcome to attend and will have the opportunity to be heard upon this resolution. Paul M. Mahoney Roanoke County Attorney Please publish on November 7, 2000 Please send bill to: Ms. Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 C:\WINDOW S\TEMP\G W V fewer\depaul.notice.tax.ex.wpd Martha Plank 7R 540.981-3415 ~ Oct. 30, 200 10!30/2000 The Roanoke Times Acct : 5407741208BRAN P h : 5407741208 ATTN.: TOM BRANCH 4552 FRANKLIN RD. ROANOKE VA Name: BRANCH MANAGEMENT LEGAL N011CE Class Rate: Disp Rate: "°t°° ~'~^~"~ ~h^en l~ e11 Credit Status: LM inters=Fed per,em~ that the Roanoke County board of 6upervieor~ will hold a publio hearln~at tne!r 7:04 p.m. ses- 24014 Reply Request A 2iooo°nln tBoaMteethP Room at tre R~amlae County gtlminlzt otlan Canter, 5206 Paytype BL Rate LE Source FX Class 10 Start 10/31/00 Days Legals Rep: 37 Barrord Oriva S.W. on tha poti• ton Ma Bonch Pamiy, LLt, m g ^ +ncata ~ portico of a 20 foot Le als TFN xvtar rnaaaaarcan<and a por. Lion of an exekiny~ ~0 foot x ni- t Rate 1S! 2 Stop 11!7!00 tary sewer eaxmen# end aooeptaroe d the reboatad patiorv azraa3 Parcel 1B•i•A 01 Peters Creek Commercial o.oo Wards...... 0.00 Lines....... 0.00 Depth..... Columns.. o.oo Graphic.... o.oo St Words. Free Day 0 ^ Boxed Ad Copy Line 20 foot sewer easemt Sort String On Hold 156 Price 155 22 Far k, PktBook22, Fete 197; . Tax Mee Nv. 57.G9.1.6.9 in 39 Discount 0.00 the r~liu,s Mag's~rlal olstric,. A copy of tha documantsz 39.00 Commis 0.00 related to tn~ reGUest maprDe aYwminatl In iha offlCO of tha 1 Net 155.22 Dapartmant of community 0 St Tax 0.00 6exlopmenk, koated at the RoanokacourihyA.dninitlration 0 Fed Tax 0.00 Can+ar. clxnrnderrrNhandkhb26th of ~tober 2000 d Total 155.22 , , ay Mary H. Aikn, CM O, Clerk la the Board Payment 0.00 Roanoire County 9oard a App Cr. 0.00 Sups nrlaora ao~~s~rst Balance 0.00 Product Co Tear Sheets ^ Ad Killed PO # Branch Famil Comments Reason for Discount Mary Allen A d i d : 154535 Editions DC, LEGAL NOTICE Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their 7:00 p.m. session on Tuesday, November 14, 2000 in the Board Meeting Room at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive S. W. on the petition of the Branch Family, LLC, to vacate a portion of a 20 foot water line easement and a portion of an existing 20 foot sanitary sewer easement and acceptance of the relocated portions across Parcel 1 B-1-A of Peters Creek Commercial Park, Plat Book 22, Page 137; Tax Map No. 37.08-1-6.3 in the Hollins Magisterial District. A copy of the documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Community Development, located at the Roanoke County Administration Center. Given under my hand this 25th day of October , 2000. ~• Mary H. Allen, CMC, Clerk to the Board Roanoke County Board of Supervisors PLEASE PUBLISH IN THE ROANOKE TIMES ON Tuesday, October 31, 2000 Tuesday, November 7, 2000 Direct the bill for publication to: Mr. Tom Branch 4552 Franklin Road Roanoke, VA 24014 Mail affidavit to: ~ '7 ~--. / a o ~ Mary H. Allen, Clerk to the Board County of Roanoke P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE Notice is hereby given to all interested persons that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at their 7:00 p.m. session on Tuesday, November 14, 2000 in the Board Meeting Room at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive S. W. on the petition of C&D Builders tp vacate a 15 foot drainage easement recorded in Plat Book 15, Page 131, within the boundary of Derby Drive in Triple Crown Estates, Section 1, and located in the Vinton Magisterial District. A copy of the documents related to this request may be examined in the office of the Department of Community Development, located at the Roanoke County Administration Center. Given under my hand this 20th day of October, 2000 Mary H. Allen, CMC, Clerk to the Board Roanoke County Board of Supervisors PLEASE PUBLISH IN THE ROANOKE TIMES ON Tuesday, October 31, 2000 Tuesday, November 7, 2000 Direct the bill for publication to: Samuel W. Cundiff C&D Builders, Inc. 116 S. Pollard Street Vinton, VA 24179 Mail affidavit to: Mary H. Allen, Clerk to the Board ~ ~ `a - a-3 '`/ 3 County of Roanoke P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 ~ - ~+ C O V E R FAX S H E E T Clerk to the Board To: Roanoke Times Legal Advertising Fax #: Subj: Legal Notices Date: Octoberal~l, 2000 Pages: 2, including this cover sheet. COMMENTS: Please advertise the attached legal notice5in the Roanoke Times on the following dates: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 Tuesday, November 7, 2000 If you have any questions, please contact me at 772-2003. From the desk of... Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board County of Roanoke P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke„ VA 24018 Phone: 540-772-2003 Fax:540-772-2193 RKE BOARD SUPERVISORS TEL~540-7~2-21'g3 Oct 25'00 12 41 ,. No. Receiver Transmitter Date Time Made Pages Result Transmit Confirmation Report 002 RT-LEGAL RKE BOARD SUPERVISORS Oct 25'00 1241 01'21 Norm 03 OK Mary Allen -Withdrawal of SUP Request; U.S. Cellular; John Richardson Road. Page 1 From: Terry Harrington To: creekmor@woodsrogers.com Date: 10/30/00 2:48PM Subject: ithdrawal of SUP Request; U.S. Cellular; John Richardson Road. James: Please accept this as written confirmation that we have received your request to withdraw the SUP permit application of US Cellular for a Broadcasting Tower on John Richardson Road. I have notified the Board of Supervisors of your withdrawal, and also notified the Roanoke Times asking that they not run the legal ads for the previously scheduled November 14, 2000 public hearing. Terry Harrington Roanoke County Planner 540.772.2106 CC: Mary Allen; Paul Mahoney Mary Allen - Re: Reserve Board Conference room Page 1 From: Paul Mahoney To: Diane Hyatt; Mary Allen Date: 11 /1 /00 8:08AM Subject: Re: Reserve Board Conference room Yes, you may list it on the 11/14 agenda. If it is not listed there, then you would have to provide notice of this meeting as you would any other meeting. »> Allen 10/31/00 07:58AM »> I'll resew he room and yes, the Board will need to announce it because the Audit Committee has two Board mem sand transacts County business. By copy of this to Paul Mahoney, does this need to be listed on the Nov. 14 agenda with adjournment? Mary Allen »> Diane Hyatt 10/30/00 03:41 PM »> Can I reserve the board conference room for an audit committee meeting on Nov 17 at 8:30? Also, Mary, do you need to mention this at the close of the Nov 14 meeting? CC: Brenda Holton Mary F~Ilen -Nov. 14 Proclamation Page 1 d f ~~ _~f .~~ From: "Linda Scarborough" <Icarborough@res.k12.va.us> ` ` ,. To: <mallen@co.roanoke.va.us> ~~~ '''~ '~'~~ ~~ Date: Fri, Oct 27, 2000 11:20 AM "'' Subject: Nov. 14 Proclamation ,~....R~.~...~ Ms. Allen, -~ ~ .~! , :.~' _,~- ~'-~. ~ ~- ~.~_ The following people will be in attendance from Roanoke County Schools for the American Education Week proclamation that will be read at your Board Meeting in November. ~~~,~ ~~ Maggie Angell -Vice President of the Roanoke County Education Association (RCEA) and teacher at Mountain View Elementary School and ~ ,C J~4`r'~'~'~ Dr. Linda Weber -Superintendent ~ ~ o~ /~.oa ~~ ~''~, ~~~ ~ Thanks for your help. Linda M. Scarborough Community Relations Specialist Roanoke County Schools s Whereat, public schools are the backbone of our democracy, providing young people with the tools they need to maintain our nation's precious values of freedom, and equality; and Wherc-as, by equipping young Americans with both practical skills and broader intellectual abilities, schools given them hope for, and access to, a productive future; and Whereas, education employees - be they custodians or teachers, bus drivers or librarians -work tirelessly to serve our children and communities with care and professionalism; and Whereas, schools are community linchpins, bringing together adults and children, educators and volunteers, business leaders and elected officials in a common enterprise; Now therefore, 1, Jerry Canada serving as Chairman of The County School Board of Roanoke County Do hereby proclaim November 12 - 18 as the 79th annual observance of AMERICAN EDUCATl~N WEEK __ __. "~+aican iducstlon Mla~k ~~,~» ~ y~ w i clNtd.ea.f~/aets--sram Iletphy ftueaeu ltcl~eue Signed this 25th day of October , 2000. Mary Allen - Re: Reserve Board Conference room Page 1 From: Mary Allen To: Diane Hyatt Subject: Re: Reserve Board Conference room I'll reserve the room and yes, the Board will need to announce it because the Audit Committee has two Board members and transacts County business. By copy of this to Paul Mahoney, does this need to be listed on the Nov. 14 agenda with adjournment? Mary Allen »> Diane Hyatt 10/30/00 03:41 PM »> Can I reserve the board conference room for an audit committee meeting on Nov 17 at 8:30? Also, Mary, do you need to mention this at the close of the Nov 14 meeting? CC: Brenda Holton; Paul Mahoney Brenda Holton -Fwd: Fw: Local Public Interest Page 1 From: Debbie Pitts To: Brenda Holton; Mary Allen Date: 11 /2/00 3:30PM Subject: Fwd: Fw: Local Public Interest Hi Mary and Brenda, Thank you for your help on the recognition of Rudolph Kostner, the master woodcarver, who will be visiting Black Forest Gifts on November 17th from noon - 4pm. The attachment provides all of the details about his five US city tour to demonstrate his wood carving skills. I will fax you one additional document. I have spoken with Denise Durham, the owner of Black Forest Gifts, and she likes our plan to present an Honorary Citizen certificate and a brass paperweight to heron November 14 at the Board of Supervisors meeting. I will meet her in the lobby of RCAC but she will accept the items on behalf of Rudolph. Rudolph will be at Black Forest Gifts at 11am on Nov. 17 and I would like to have Mr McNamara or Mr Hodge present to personally present the above items to him. If that is not possible, perhaps, John or Dan could do the honors. If all else fails, I will be happy to meet him and present the certificate. Please let me know what you think. Mr Hodge..........Denise is very pleased with this and feels that it is wonderful that Roanoke County has shown such interest. We talked about media avenues that she could pursue, tents, etc. She does not need any further assistance, equipment, etc. I told her to let me know if she needed any other help. If I missed something that you wanted, please let me know. Debbie Pitts Assistant Director of Recreation 540-387-6078 ext 252 Our Work is Your Play! CC: Elmer Hodge; Pete Haislip Brenda Holton - Fw: Local Public Interest Page 1 From: "Ken Durham" <ken@blackforestgifts.com> To: <dpitts@www.co.roanoke.va.us> Date: 11 /2/00 11:13AM Subject: Fw: Local Public Interest Debbie, Following is some information on the Woodcarver that is coming to our store from Italy. You can visit the ANRI web site at http://www.anri.com/, the item he will be carving is the block Nativity sized 7" X 5". We have the block he will carve now. My wife Denise will also forward you more information. Our store Black Forest Gifts is lucky to have ANRI Master Wood Carver, Rudolph Kostner (picture attached), in a highly limited schedule of only 5 locations in the United States. He will be at our store located at 3544 Electric Road on Friday November 17th from 12:00 AM - 4:00 PM. I am attaching web site information as well as data from that site. If you would like more information you can call my wife Denise at 725 9900. ANRI web site is at: http://www.anri.com/ Touring information is as follows: MASTER CARVER TO APPEAR IN U.S. Good news for lovers of ANRI woodcarvings! Master Carver Rudolph Kostner, in a highly limited schedule, will be appearing this fall in a few select locations around the country. The dates and times are effective as of October 1, 2000 and are as follows: Saturday November 11 Schnitzelbank Woodcarving Shop Sunday November 12 Frankenmuth MI 12:OOnoon-2: OOpm; 4:00-6:OOpm Wednesday November 15 St. Mary's Bookstore Nashville TN 10:OOam-2:OOpm Thursday November 16 Happy Pastime Middleton WI 12:OOnoon-4:OOpm Friday November 17 Black Forest Gifts Roanoke VA 12:OOnoon-4:OOpm Saturday November 18 Saxony Imports Cincinnati OH 12:OOnoon-2: OOpm; 5:30-7:30pm From a single block of wood, Rudi will carve one of his Nativity masterpieces. Spend some time with this remarkable artist and enjoy his display of superlative handcraftsmanship. Thank you for your time. Regards, Brenda Holton - Fw: Local Public Interest Page 2 Ken Durham Black Forest Gifts Mary Allen - Re: call from Debbie Pitts Page 1 From: Mary Allen To: Brenda Holton Subject: Re: call from Debbie Pitts I like the idea of Honorary Citizen and/or Certificate of Recognition and gift (brass paperweight). If we don't mention Black Forest Gift Shop, but just that he is visiting Roanoke. We can do the recognition at a Board Meeting. Someone (Debbie) should get facts about him for the BOS Meeting. »> Brenda Holton 11/01/00 03:46PM »> Mr. Hodge told Debbie that Black Forest Gift Shop is sponsoring a visit by a master carver from Italy. He is arriving midnight Nov 16 and flying out Nov 17 at 6 p.m. He is only visiting five cities in the US. He is going to carve a nativity scene in four hours. ECH wants her to do everything she can to make visit special and suggested recognition by the Board, perhaps a proclamation but next Board meeting 11-14 which is before he arrives. She asked if we could do proclamation and present to owner of shop and then ECH or JPM could re-present to him on the day he is here. Told her that it seems a bit like advertising for the shop if we do at Board meeting and she has the same concerns. Told her we also have Honorary Citizen certificates or certificates of recognition that we could do without going to the Board but she thinks that ECH wants the public to know he is here because big event when master carver comes. Told her we would discuss and call her tomorrow. Brenda Holton -block-fam.jpg Page 1 RKE CO PARKS & REC DEP TEL:15403875146 . ~~~ __..-~~ r.-. ..rx. Nov 02 00 14:59 No.006 P.O1 J7V ~~~ aai.lt P. ~ Black Fo>rsi Gifb Telephone (510-n3-9lWI} ~ gloct~ck Koxa Pax (S~0-y85r9yU1) Proeueeitde laarlc Reaneke VA ?~t01B Novrmbcr 1, 20pt1 lhbbia 'Chaok you lion talkLkq wkh me today, here ie s~ short intatnatlon on the Woodcarvor ~«„ >rx>y. Arriivi~ NaWOmber 1.7, for ono day on~y,lNaeter Woodcotva Rudy Kostn4r rgtrasentitgl ANRi A.rt, from t,3taden, Italy wiR be in Koaooloo at BIRCk >'orat [t1111>f. k1o vritl he visiting cx~Iy 5 citiaa dtum~ hia US tour. Hs will be carving a S piaoe bbck NdiVity nta+suring approxitnGsly G" higfi x 1 z" long, dig tlw baura oi' i2:00 pm to 4:00 pan..Atl I~uri ptoveK are cwved a~tiialy by hand with0lh thaaseistetx~e Of ~ fPOClai tooiing. Wa vViil have a 1'rnitdd nUltlbOr OPtltesP ee~~ evailsbic for puidusC avid aiplinS. Mri is ~ ~voOelcarvin0 abrnp~rrg of mReters started in 1912, and Iwe produced stw~y w+drlcs of set troth woad In land orrvad form. Mri has pr~asantad nuu~y of flr~e pieces sa gIM to the Pape. Anri has apenial pannission given by the VAl;nlm to reproduoa in woadpkohs oitltc Nativl~y an cg!aplRy in Maly. Ws . at H10dc f~Onea Gifla. del very fottute>be to havo bew~ included in his iietttted tour, and appreelato t>!o atlesttion whbh iil,outolce City Comnoll Mtanbay brvc shorovn. we hope tha will he Rn iataesting sad inlE~rrrtativ~e event for Ilte ltoaaoice Villley. ~'t~~gil+e#pe xAru Ra~+e~Ca ~~ ~ ~ ~lvwanba 1, ~ 1?~bie~ 'C'hank y~a~u ~~r tam v~~h mo try, trans ~ a slit ~exr~atlart vn t~ woadr~rvar free ~dtljr. 1~rrh-ir~ Naro~n~or t.7, fc-r ana o~nly,1l~,~a ~V~dcatvrx Itt~dy ~~r re~aa~,entin~, ~tR! t~:t, ~dat, Ir~t~r wilt ba In RoA ~~ Blaok p~ras~ ~, ~tl ~ vi~itiog ~1y ~ ~itias ~irio~ ~~ ~,JS tour. Ike wlfl ba carvi~~ a ~ p~ ~-1c~ak 1~at~v rn~suting epp~xarr~t~fy ~" x 1 ~"' long, ~~~ ~ ~vurs Qf Z2:Op pm to 4:~ pm..~t A~ piaaeK are c~r3-ec1 a~tir~- b~ hind without Lha+~seist~na~ of at~r ~l ti.liltn wtlf have a Iirni~d nuro!bar ~~'I~x.~a ~+ svail~tbto far p~-ro1 and ~igr~in~. ~# ~~ ~ an-~~ crn~p~~ c~'rz~a~t~"s st~.rtod i~~ i ~ t 2* ~d has p~d+uc~ad s~ .~+~rka ~`~rt m d err bond ~rvad fa~t~a~. ~i h~ p~nasa-tad ~t~~r of fhe~ pie+~~s ~e ~,~~ ha thrPc ~n~i hA~ sgerc~l per~y~i~siQa~ ~jv+d~- h1- thr. Va~;nar- t~ roprodu~ un wraadp a~t~c ~Idtr ~ ~iapiay in ital. fie, tt ~1~ic Cwt ~d~, ~a1 wary ~gttuna~ t~ #~-wa been ~ipl~ded Ott big lirn~~ ta~~r, a~ ~ppr~c~tc t~ action w~,ioh ~,ar»aic~ ~~tr Ce~ri~~ tit ~ slra~wn. '~a t~~ vo+iil h~ ae~ iatae~ting ~d ~~~ e~nt fix ih~ ~aaaait~ Y~l~y. .` Bieck ForeM Gift X544 gle~tsic Rvxd Rra~aeeea4de dark Rrae~eka V~ 24b~$ Telep6o~ (340-7Z3-~U~ Irax (54~-7a5~01) Na~snba 1, ~OOA Ud7biq 'C'hanlc you fcu talking with ma try, Mare ~ stta#. iniarmetian on the Woadcervcr ham Katy. Arriving Na±vomba 1, 7, fnr one X41' only, tMaater Waadcatver study tCa~er rq~rn~enkiryi ANRi 11~ trom ~nden, Italy wilt be in KoAO~oioa nt 91aak Pluest t~tta, ~ v~iil be visiting txtiy 5 oitias d~~ag ftha US tour. He wi11 be carvd~ s S piece b1oCk Netit+tty rwnsuti~g app~uximatoly G" x 1 ~" lang. durEng tlw bvucs of t2:00 pm tv 4:00 pe~..A11 Arn-i piocae~s ara exuved aiti~ij- bJ' hand witltcwt tha sesislene~e of +utar spacimt t~o0l- VI-o wilt have s Iimibad r~tnbar of q~e osr~inga svaitsblc for purolsas~ a~ si0riing. A,ri ie ~ rr+-i^5 ccrrnpp~- af' maw stdrted in t 9i2, erd hae produced A~Mhy w+bl'liu of let woad in band a~rved fo~rin. Aori has pnaeentad n~aa~r of itti<x+e ~ as gilh ~ the Pc+pa. Anri bae apecxiai pen»issiai given by the vRlinAn t~ tvtxoduca in w~aad piooea of tltc ~Vetivi~y c~ ttiy in Italy. We , tt ~lpdc Cwt Gild. ~a1 rra'Y fprtuneto to }rlvo bear iucindad in Eta iimitt+d tdz~r, end sppreetatQ t~0 at~rdon wl~bh Roenoka Cf~y Co<metl Mtno~ay riur+c sltiawn. ~Va tt~apG thin ve+i11 he as iata+asCing sad i~tt~ event fur thu liaiaoke VA1ky. Bren~~a Holton -Fwd: Re: call from Debbie Pitts Page 1 .-« From: Brenda Holton To: Debbie Pitts Date: 11/2/00 8:48AM Subject: Fwd: Re: call from Debbie Pitts Debbie, see Mary Allen's reply to my a-mail about the visit yesterday. If you would get all of the information to me, I will prepare the certificate for presentation at the 11-14 meeting. Brenda J. Holton Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 540-772-2005 bholton@co. roanoke.va. us CC: Mary Allen Brenda Holton - Re: call from Debbie Pitts Page 1 From: Mary Allen To: Brenda Holton Date: 11 /2/00 7:45AM Subject: Re: call from Debbie Pitts I like the idea of Honorary Citizen and/or Certificate of Recognition and gift (brass paperweight). If we don't mention Black Forest Gift Shop, but just that he is visiting Roanoke. We can do the recognition at a Board Meeting. Someone (Debbie) should get facts about him for the BOS Meeting. »> Brenda Holton 11/01/00 03:46PM »> Mr. Hodge told Debbie that Black Forest Gift Shop is sponsoring a visit by a master carver from Italy. He is arriving midnight Nov 16 and flying out Nov 17 at 6 p.m. He is only visiting five cities in the US. He is going to carve a nativity scene in four hours. ECH wants her to do everything she can to make visit special and suggested recognition by the Board, perhaps a proclamation but next Board meeting 11-14 which is before he arrives. She asked if we could do proclamation and present to owner of shop and then ECH or JPM could re-present to him on the day he is here. Told her that it seems a bit like advertising for the shop if we do at Board meeting and she has the same concerns. Told her we also have Honorary Citizen certificates or certificates of recognition that we could do without going to the Board but she thinks that ECH wants the public to know he is here because big event when master carver comes. Told her we would discuss and call her tomorrow. ~1CI -1~~~D0 -11:OD CI.~l1, ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA NOVEMBER 14, 2000 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m. on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. The meetings are broadcast live on RVTV, Channel 3, will be rebroadcast on Thursdays at 7 P.M. and Saturdays at 4 p.m., and are now closed captioned. BECAUSE OF THE THANKSGIVING AND CHRISTMAS HOLIDAYS, THE ONLY MEETING IN NOVEMBER WILL BE NOVEMBER 14 AT 3:00 P.M. AND 7:00 P.M. THE DECEMBER MEETINGS WILL BE HELD ON DECEMBER 5 AT 3:00 P.M. AND DECEMBER 19 AT 3:00 P.M. AND 7:00 P.M. Individuals who require assistance or special arrangements to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings should contact the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772-2005 at least 48 hours in advance so reasonable accommodations may be made. A. B. C. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call 2. Invocation: 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1 1. Proclamation declaring the week of November 12 - 18, 2000 as American Education Week. 2. Certificate of Honorary Citizenship to Master Wood Carver, Rudolph Kostner, from Groden, Italy who will hold a special carving in Roanoke County on November 17, 2000. D. BRIEFINGS E. NEW BUSINESS Request to negotiate an agreement for Botetourt County and Roanoke County to jointly provide water and sewer service to the proposed Stonegate subdivision. (Gary Robertson, Utility Director) CONTINUED FROM OCTOBER 24. 2000. 2. Request to approve a resolution adopting a Legislative Program for the 2001 General Assembly session. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 3. Request to approve a construction contract and advance funds for the renovations at Glenvar Middle School (Dr. Linda Weber, School Superintendent and Diane Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer) 4. Request for support of grant application for protection of Read Mountain and appropriation of $50,000 matching funds. (Janet Scheid, Senior Planner) F. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA: Approval of these items does not indicate support for, or judge the merits of, the requested zoning actions but satisfies procedural requirements and schedules the Public Hearings which will be held after recommendation by the Planning Commission. 1. Petition of First Team Auto Mall to obtain a Special Use Permit for Automobile Repair, Major, located at the northeastern corner of Peters Creek and Barrens Road, Hollins Magisterial District. 2. Petition of Tim T. Snyder to rezone property in the 5200 block of 2 Peters Creek Road from C-2 conditional, General Commercial to C- 2, General Commercial, Hollins Magisterial District. 3. Petition of the Roanoke County Planning Commission to amend the 1998 Roanoke County Community Plan by adopting design policies and standards for the Clearbrook Community and to amend the Official Zoning Ordinance of Roanoke County by rezoning certain parcels in the Clearbrook Community from A V Agricultural Village and AR Agricultural Residential to C-2 Commercial and further amending said zoning map and text by the addition of the Clearbrook Village Design Overlay District. 4. Petition of Roanoke County Board of Supervisors to rezone specific parcels of property to commercial and industrial designations and to adopt specific design guidelines for commercial and industrial uses in the vicinity of the Dixie Caverns 1-81 Interchange, Exit 132. G. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. First reading of ordinance to establish a utility service area in Clearbrook for water and sewer extensions. (Gary Robertson, Utility Director) H. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES APPOINTMENTS 1. Blue Ridge Alliance for Organ and Tissue Donation 2. Blue Ridge Community Services Board of Directors 3. Grievance Panel 4. Highway and Transportation Safety Commission 5. Planning Commission 6. Social Services Advisory Board J. CONSENT AGENDA 3 ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Approval of Minutes -September 12, 2000 (Regular Meeting), September 26, 2000 (Regular Meeting and Joint Meeting with the Vinton Town Council), October 10, 2000 (Joint Meeting with Roanoke City Council), October 10, 2000 (Regular Meeting), October 10, 2000 (Joint Meeting with Montgomery County Board of Supervisors) 2. Confirmation of appointment to the Industrial Development Authority. 3. Resolutions of Appreciation upon the retirement of a. Ricky L. Etter, Sheriff's Office b. Martha A. Gladden, Social Services Department c. Jeffrey M. Swortzel, Police Department d. Roger F. Robinson, Police Department e. Edward A. Shotwell, Police Department f. Linda S. Hogan; Police Department 4. Acceptance by the Police Department of the Bureau of Justice Assistance $31,454 block grant for law enforcement support. 5. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving The Gardens of Cotton Hill, Section 5 (Phase I). 6. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving Hickory Hill, Section 2. 7. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving A Cleaner World. 8. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving Whitney Estates Section 1 and 2. 9. Donation of 0.12 acre of land for public right-of-way from Residential Contractors, Inc. conveyed to the Board of Supervisors in the Hollins Magisterial District. 10. Request for acceptance of Blue Bird Lane to the secondary highway system and to improve the road to State standards. 11. Appropriation of funds for the interest expense on the Valley 4 Gateway shell building through June 30, 2001. 12. Request for approval of issuance of bonds by the Industrial Development Authority for the benefit of Certified Medical Representatives Institute, Inc. 13. Acceptance of Overlook Trail into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 14. Request to abolish the Roanoke County Highway Transportation and Safety Commission to focus efforts on the Blue Ridge Transportation Safety Board. 15. Request from Sheriffs Office to accept the Adult Literacy and Basic Education Program Grant. K. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS L. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS M. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS N. REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Future School Capital Reserve 5. Proclamation signed by the Chairman 6. Update on Emergency Medical Dispatchers since implementation of 911 increase 7. Statement of Treasurer's Accountability per investiment and portflio policy as of October 31, 2000. O. WORK SESSIONS 5 1. 2. 3. Work Session with Schools to discuss the School Administration Six Year Plan. Work Session to review the Secondary System Six-Year Construction Plan and revenue sharing projects. Budget Work Sessions to review: (a) First quarter revenues as of September 30, 2000. (b) Rollover requests from 1999-2000 budget. (c) Other budget considerations P. CLOSED MEETING pursuant to Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344A (7) consultation with counsel and briefings by staff concerning litigation with Rising Star Sports Camp. ~<3) ~~ a~-~ ~_~ ~~ ~~ EVENING SESSION (7:00 P.M.) ~ ~.y -~-eJ Q. C~--z,~` ,a~~ CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION n R. PROCLAMATIONS, AWARDS RESOLUTIONS, RECOGN~IONS, AND Resolution of Congratulations to Alan May for being named to the All State Golf Team. 2. Resolution of Congratulations to the staff and advisors of William Byrd High School "Sketches" for being named most Outstanding High School Literary-Art Magazine for 2000. S. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request for appropriation as a result of operations for the year ended June 30, 2000. (Diane Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer) T. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Public Hearing for citizen comment on the petition of DePaul Family Services, Inc. to adopt a resolution supporting it's request to the Virginia General Assembly to exempt from taxation certain property owned by DePaul in the County of Roanoke. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) U. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES ~fi. (WITHDRAWN AT THE REQUEST OF THE PETITIONER) Second 6 reading of ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit to construct a 180 foot broadcasting tower, located in the 300 block of John Richardson Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of U. S. Cellular. 2. Second reading of ordinance to amend and re-enact Sections 30-82- 12 and 30-82-13 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance to make minor revisions to use and design standards for certain single family residential developments, upon the petition of the Roanoke County Planning Commission. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) 3. Second reading of ordinance to obtain two Special Use Permits to operate a camp and a day care center located at 5488 Yellow Mountain Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of the C&H Enterprises and Rising Star Sports & Adventure Camp. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) 4. Second reading of ordinance amending Ordinance 011299-6, "Roanoke County Community Plan" for adoption of a new future land use map and design guidelines for the Colonial Avenue corridor. (Tim Beard, Planner) 5. Second reading of ordinance vacating a 15 foot drainage easement recorded in Plat Book 15, Page 131, within the boundary of Derby Drive in Triple Crown Estates, Section 1 and located in the Vinton Magisterial District. (Arnold Covey, Community Development Director) 6. Second reading of ordinance authorizing the vacation of a portion of a 20 foot water line easement and a portion of an existing 20 foot sanitary sewer easement and acceptance of the relocated portions across Parcel 1 B-1-A of Peters Creek Commercial Park. (Arnold Covey, Community Development Director) V. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS W. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS X. ADJOURNMENT PLEASE NOTE: There will be a meeting of the Roanoke County Audit Committee on November 17 at 8:30 a.m, at the Roanoke County Administration Center 7 ~'omm ~ss~o.-~ y 1~r~ -11/6/vv -3,ov ~,m. ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA NOVEMBER 14, 2000 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m. on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. The meetings are broadcast live on RVTV, Channel 3, will be rebroadcast on Thursdays at 7 P.M. and Saturdays at 4 p.m., and are now closed captioned. BECAUSE OF THE THANKSGIVING AND CHRISTMAS HOLIDAYS THE ONLY MEET/NG /N NOVEMBER WILL BE NOVEMBER 74 AT 3:00 P.M. AND 7:00 P.M. THE DECEMBER MEETINGS WILL BE HELD ON DECEMBER 5 AT 3:00 P.M. AND DECEMBER 79 AT 3:00 P.M. AND 7:00 P.M. Individuals who require assistance or special arrangements to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings should contact the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772-2005 at least 48 hours in advance so reasonable accommodations may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call 2. Invocation: 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1 1. Resolution of Appreciation upon the retirement of Joseph A. Keaton, Community Development Department. 2. Proclamation declaring the week of November 12 - 18, 2000 as American Education Week. 3. Certificate of Honorary Citizenship to Master Wood Carver, Rudolph Kostner, from Groden, Italy who will hold a special carving in Roanoke County on November 17, 2000. ~`~~~ i. D. BRIEFINGS 1. In roductio new o is de elo ent advertising campaign. :¢,c_ . (David Porter, Ec i Develo ent Dire or) E. NEW BUSINESS ~rrlrrl 1. Request to negotiate an agreement for Botetourt County and ~-o ~_~ ~-k-- Roanoke County to jointly provide water and sewer service to the rr ° 5e ~ M~9 CONTINUED FROM OCTOBER 24 2000. obertson, Utility Director) 2. Request to approve a resolution adopting a Legislative Program for the 2001 General Assembly session. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 3. Request for approval of issuance of bonds by the Industrial Development Authority for the benefit of Certified Medical Representatives Institute, Inc. -~o~~plnnm nt Dir rtnr..h - `~~4. equest r a val o Pe ance greeme t with Land Rover. (~~ 5. .Request for appropriation as a result of operations for the year ended June 30, 2000 (Diane Hyatt, ) ~ , C..1~,e ~c ~ r~a~ eacz / ©-~, car ~° V~ n ~ 2 6. Request to approve a construction contract and advance funds for the renovations at Glenvar Middle School (Dr. Linda Weber, School Superintendent and Diane Hyatt, wee-I~i~es#a~.) F. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA: Approval of fhese items does not indicate support for, or judge the merits of, the requested zoning actions but satisfies procedural requirements and schedules the Public Hearings which will be held after recommendation by fhe Planning Commission. G. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. First reading of ordinance to establish a utility service area in Clearbrook for water and sewer extensions. (Gary Robertson, Utility Director) H. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES I. APPOINTMENTS 1. Blue Ridge Alliance for Organ and Tissue Donation 2. Blue Ridge Community Services Board of Directors 3. Grievance Panel 4. Highway and Transportation Safety Commission 5, Planning Commission 3 6. Social Services Advisory Board J. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Approval of Minutes -September 12, 2000 (Regular Meeting), September 26, 2000 (Regular Meeting and Joint Meeting with the Vinton Town Council), October 10, 2000 (Joint Meeting with Roanoke City Council), October 10, 2000 (Regular Meeting), October 10, 2000 (Joint Meeting with Montgomery County Board of Supervisors) 2. Confirmation of appointment to the Industrial Development Authority. 3. Resolutions of Appreciation upon the retirement of a. Ricky L. Etter, Sheriff's Office b. Martha A. Gladden, Social Services Department c. Jeffrey M. Swortzel, Police Department d. Roger F. Robinson, Police Department e. Edward A. Shotwell, Police Department f. Linda S. Hogan; Police Department 4. Acceptance by the Police Department of the Bureau of Justice ~~ 7~ ~ ~ Assistance $31,454 block grant for law enforcement support. 1 ~ S 5, Appropriation of $55,790 in Federal Title IV-E pass-through funds to the Department of Social Services. 6. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving Hickory Hill, Section 2. 7. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving A Cleaner World. 8. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving Whitney Estates Section 1 and 2. 4 9. Donation of 0.12 acre of land for public right-of-way from Residential Contractors, Inc. conveyed to the Board of Supervisors in the Hollins Magisterial District. 10. Request for acceptance of Blue Bird Lane to the secondary highway system and to improve the road to State standards. 11. Appropriation of funds for the interest expense on the ValleyTech Park shell building through June 30, 2001. K. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS L. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS M. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS N. REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Future School Capital Reserve 5. Proclamation signed by the Chairman 5 7. Update on Emergency Medical Dispatchers since implementation of 911 increase O. WORK SESSIONS 1. Work Session with Schools to discuss the School Administration Six Year Plan. C/ose~ rne~~'in9 2. ork Ses n to us is t r orts Camp Special Use Per equ s . 3. Work Session to review the Secondary System Six-Year Construction Plan and revenue sharing projects. 4. Work Sessions to review: (a) First quarter revenues as of September 30, 2000. (b) Rollover requests from 1999-2000 budget. (Brent Robertson, Budget Director C '~-„~ ~ ~ ~ e~ u.o/9 ~~ L' . O n 5 ~c~G. r'G~~-ion 5 P. CLOSED M~ ~N~ purs~ua~nt to Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344A - •E~is„-~ EVENING SESSION (7:00 P.M.~ Q. CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION R. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Resolution of Congratulations to Alan May for being named to the All State Golf Team. 2. Resolution of Congratulations to the staff and advisors of William Byrd High School "Sketches" for being named most Outstanding High School Literary-Art Magazine for 2000. S. PUBLIC HEARINGS 6 1. Public Hearing for citizen comment on the petition of DePaul Family Services, Inc. to adopt a resolution supporting it's request to the Virginia General Assembly to exempt from taxation certain property owned by DePaul in the County of Roanoke. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) T. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. WITHDRAWN AT THE REQUEST OF THE PETITIONER) Second reading of ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit to construct a 180 foot broadcasting tower, located in the 300 block of John Richardson Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of U. S. Cellular. 2. Second reading of ordinance to amend and re-enact Sections 30-82- 12 and 30-82-13 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance to make minor revisions to use and design standards for certain single family residential developments, upon the petition of the Roanoke County Planning Commission. 3. Second reading of ordinance to obtain two Special Use Permits to operate a camp and a day care center located at 5488 Yellow Mountain Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of the C&H Enterprises and Rising Star Sports & Adventure Camp. 4. Second reading of ordinance amending Ordinance 011299-6, "Roanoke County Community Plan" for adoption of a new future land use map and design guidelines for the Colonial Avenue corridor. (Tim Beard, Planner) 5. Second reading of ordinance vacating a 15 foot drainage easement recorded in Plat Book 15, Page 131, within the boundary of Derby Drive in Triple Crown Estates, Section 1 and located in the Vinton Magisterial District. (Arnold Covey, Community Development Director) 6. Second reading of ordinance authorizing the vacation of a portion of a 20 foot water line easement and a portion of an existing 20 foot sanitary sewer easement and acceptance of the relocated portions across Parcel 1 B-1-A of Peters Creek Commercial Park. (Arnold Covey, Community Development Director) 7 7. Second r ing of or inan and r nacting Section 21-3. "Utility Serv e Tax" A 'c "In ene I" of Chapter 21, 'on" of he oan a Cou Co to conform to the ~ ~~ requireme of irginia tatu dere 'ng a ical and natural aas industries. (Joseph be ain, nior Assistant County Y) U. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS V. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS W. ADJOURNMENT PLEASE NOTE• There will be a meeting of the Roanoke Countv Audif Committee on November 77 at 8:30 a.m. at the Roanoke Countv Administration Center 8 O~ ~iOANp,~.~ ~ ' z +7 z a rasa COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (540)772-2004 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (540) 772-2193 November 17, 2000 Mr. Thomas A. Abbott 3016 Winterberry Drive, SW Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Mr. Abbott: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS JOSEPH McNAMARA, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX, VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT JOSEPH B. "BUTCH" CHURCH CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (540) 772-2005 On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, I would like to thank you for the time you served on the Roanoke County Highway Transportation and Safety Commission. Your contributions to your community through service on this Commission are very much appreciated. This Commission was formed initially to approve grant requests and promote highway and transportation safety programs. Because grants are no longer processed in this manner, and there have been five vacancies on the Commission for some time, the Board decided at our November 14th meeting to abolish this Commission. Instead, the Board wants to refocus our efforts on the Blue Ridge Transportation Safety Board (BRTSB). The BRTSB has members from 16 counties (including Roanoke County) (including Roanoke County), 8 cities and 23 towns, and is currently involved in efforts such as Interstate 81 safety and the importance of using child safety seats and bicycle helmets. They meet quarterly and include members similarto our Commission such as police officers, and representatives from insurance companies, and the legal, medical, and law enforcement communities. Officer Lee Linkous, Roanoke County Police Department, is a member of this Board, and if you would like more information or are interested in becoming part of this organization, you can contact him at 540-561-8062. Enclosed for your information is a copy of the November issue of Transportation Safety News which is published by the BRTSB. Again, we appreciate your past efforts to ensure the safety of the all citizens, and hope that you will decide to continue your efforts and become part of the Blue Ridge Transportation and Safety Board. As a small token of our appreciation, we enclose a Certificate of Appreciation for your service to Roanoke County. Sincerely, J eph McNamara, Chairman oanoke County Board of Supervisor cc: Officer Lee Linkous Chief of Police Ray Lavinder Elmer Hodge, County Administrator Advisory Members of the Highway and Transportation Safety Commission C~~~txrt~ ~~ ~~~t~.a~.e Internet E-Mail ®R~oy~led Peper Internet E-Mail ehodge®www.co.roanoke.va.us bos~www.co.roanoke.va.us ~fi ,~ 44 Za--i ~~ `~`~ Q z W~ 0 Q O .../ V 2 4. Z N V 2 O V W W V O W 0 OC 0 W W W 0 '~ 4 E 0 s F 0 4. ~i~M G 4 ,v, tir~wM ((~yy~~~~ 9~fn! ~ J ,,,,,,~~(( ~L ~ ~ ~ rw ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ C~ ~~ t°~ H L .~ L H V.. ~O !'~ - ~ aoaivp~~ ~. A i ti T 2 °~ .a rasa COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (540) 772-2004 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (540) 772-2193 November 17, 2000 Mr. Gordon E. Saul 7409 Marie Drive Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Mr. Saul: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS JOSEPH MDNAMARA, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX, VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT JOSEPH B. "BUTCH" CHURCH CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (540)772-2005 On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, I would like to thank you for the time you served on the Roanoke County Highway Transportation and Safety Commission. Your contributions to your community through service on this Commission are very much appreciated. This Commission was formed initially to approve grant requests and promote highway and transportation safety programs. Because grants are no longer processed in this manner, and there have been five vacancies on the Commission for some time, the Board decided at our November 14th meeting to abolish this Commission. Instead, the Board wants to refocus our efforts on the Blue Ridge Transportation Safety Board (BRTSB). The BRTSB has members from 16 counties (including Roanoke County), 8 cities and 23 towns, and is currently involved in efforts such as Interstate 81 safety and the importance of using child safety seats and bicycle helmets. They meet quarterly and include members similar to our Commission such as police officers, and representatives from insurance companies, and the legal, medical, and law enforcement communities. Officer Lee Linkous, Roanoke County Police Department, is a member of this Board, and if you would like more information or are interested in becoming part of this organization, you can contact him at 540-561-8062. Enclosed for your information is a copy of the November issue of Transportation Safety News which is published by the BRTSB. Again, we appreciate your past efforts to ensure the safety of the all citizens, and hope that you will decide to continue your efforts and become part of the Blue Ridge Transportation and Safety Board. As a small token of our appreciation, we enclose a Certificate of Appreciation for your service to Roanoke County. Sincerely, J seph McNamara, Chairman oanoke County Board of Supervisor cc: Officer Lee Linkous Chief of Police Fly Lavinder Elmer Hodge, County Administrator Advisory Members of the Highway and Transportation Safety Commission C~n~x~~~ ~f ~n~tx~nC~.E Internet E-Mail ®R.cycl.d P,par Internet E-Mail ehodge®www.co.roanoke.va.us bos~www.co.roanoke.va.us ~~~ 44 =~-~t w u .;r ~~ Q Z O~~C W~ a o~c O V 2 0 z N v 0 V W W V W 0 C1C LL O W W W a w 0 ~, 0 c7 dui p® 1r+ V ®~+w, tiu/ r 1 ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~Q~9 ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ r.+ C? C~ W ~i. 0 c >_ C~ .~ L h ~dI O lV 11 `v ~ c~ . m° o~ ROANp,~,~ ~ 'A '.9 Z G7 z v la 1 38 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (540)772-2004 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (540) 772-2193 November 17, 2000 Mr. Hank Gregory 6583 Pencheck Circle Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Mr. Gregory: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS JOSEPH McNAMARA, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX, VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT JOSEPH B. "BUTCH" CHURCH CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (540) 772-2005 On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, I would like to thank you for the time you served on the Roanoke County Highway Transportation and Safety Commission. Your contributions to your community through service on this Commission are very much appreciated. This Commission was formed initially to approve grant requests and promote highway and transportation safety programs. Because grants are no longer processed in this manner, and there have been five vacancies on the Commission for some time, the Board decided at our November 14th meeting to abolish this Commission. Instead, the Board wants to refocus our efforts on the Blue Ridge Transportation Safety Board (BRTSB). The BRTSB has members from 16 counties (including Roanoke County), 8 cities and 23 towns, and is currently involved in efforts such as Interstate 81 safety and the importance of using child safety seats and bicycle helmets. They meet quarterly and include members similar to our Commission such as police officers, and representatives from insurance companies, and the legal, medical, and law enforcement communities. Officer Lee Linkous, Roanoke County Police Department, is a member of this Board, and if you would like more information or are interested in becoming part of this organization, you can contact him at 540-561-8062. Enclosed for your information is a copy of the November issue of Transportation Safety News which is published by the BRTSB. Again, we appreciate your past efforts to ensure the safety of the all citizens, and hope that you will decide to continue your efforts and become part of the Blue Ridge Transportation and Safety Board. As a small token of our appreciation, we enclose a Certificate of Appreciation for your service to Roanoke County. Sincerely, seph McNamara, Chairman oanoke County Board of Supervisor cc: Officer Lee Linkous Chief of Police Ray Lavinder Elmer Hodge, County Administrator Advisory Members of the Highway and Transportation Safety Commission C~~~xr#~ ~~ ~ ~~t~u~ Intemet E-Mail ®a~y~loa veao~ Internet E-Mail ehodge ~www.co.roanoke.va.us bos ~ www, co.roanoke.va.us ~~'4~ 44 ~, O2 ~~ ~`d` a_ z W~ a O V 0 z N ~_ V L2 O V W h W _V W 0 OO W W x a ro ~~ ~a ~ MGM ~~ ~~ F~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~1y,~4 L ~ @rl~nl ~ iti'9~~3 ~./ ~~ w -a° c _a H '~ ~ a~ ~ ~ o ~ o m° OF ROANpf.~ ~ 'A ~ Z Z v 'a 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (540) 772-2004 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (540) 772-2193 November 17, 2000 First Sgt. Frank W. Duffy Dept of State Police P. O. Box 978 Salem, VA 24153 Dear First Sgt. Duffy: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS JOSEPH McNAMARA, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX, VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT JOSEPH B. "BUTCH" CHURCH CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (540) 772-2005 On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, I would like to thank you for the time you served on the Roanoke County Highway Transportation and Safety Commission. Your contributions to your community through service on this Commission are very much appreciated. This Commission was formed initially to approve grant requests and promote highway and transportation safety programs. Because grants are no longer processed in this manner, and there have been five vacancies on the Commission for some time, the Board decided at our November 14th meeting to abolish this Commission. Instead, the Board wants to refocus our efforts on the Blue Ridge Transportation Safety Board (BRTSB). The BRTSB has members from 16 counties (including Roanoke County), 8 cities and 23 towns, and is currently involved in efforts such as Interstate 81 safety and the importance of using child safety seats and bicycle helmets. They meet quarterly and include members similar to our Commission such as police officers, and representatives from insurance companies, and the legal, medical, and law enforcement communities. Officer Lee Linkous, Roanoke County Police Department, is a member of this Board, and if you would like more information or are interested in becoming part of this organization, you can contact him at 540-561-8062. Enclosed for your information is a copy of the November issue of Transportation Safety News which is published by the BRTSB. Again, we appreciate your past efforts to ensure the safety of the all citizens, and hope that you will decide to continue your efforts and become part of the Blue Ridge Transportation and Safety Board. As a small token of our appreciation, we enclose a Certificate of Appreciation for your service to Roanoke County. Sincerely, /~- J seph McNamara, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisor cc: Officer Lee Linkous Chief of Police Ray Lavinder Elmer Hodge, County Administrator Advisory Members of the Highway and Transportation Safety Commission C~n~xr#~ ~~ ~u~~~C~ Internet E-Mail ®RacyclW Papar Intemet E-Mail ehodge~www.co.roanoke.va.us bos®www.co.roanoke.va.us 4~ ~~ 44 i~, ~, =~-t ~~ mod` Q Z W~ Q V Z N V W M~ V W W V W 0 CC w A 3 OO W W W a *i~ 4„ ~ ~ ~~ *~° ~ ~ r~i ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~; t, ~ ~ C"~ O .~ H O ~ v~ 0 m ,~ -~ ~ ROANp~.~ t; • ~ ~ ~ c~ o z 'a 7838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (540) 772-2004 C~u~n~~ ~f ~Z~~t~~C~e Lt. Stephen B. Tumer 1020 Barrens Village Court Roanoke, VA 24019 Dear Lt. Turner: P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (540) 772-2193 November 17, 2000 (540) 772-2005 On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, I would like to thank you for the time you served on the Roanoke County Highway Transportation and Safety Commission. Your contributions to your community through service on this Commission are very much appreciated. This Commission was formed initially to approve grant requests and promote highway and transportation safety programs. Because grants are no longer processed in this manner, and there have been five vacancies on the Commission for some time, the Board decided at our November 14th meeting to abolish this Commission. Instead, the Board wants to refocus our efforts on the Blue Ridge Transportation Safety Board (BRTSB). The BRTSB has members from 16 counties (including Roanoke County), 8 cities and 23 towns, and is currently involved in efforts such as Interstate 81 safety and the importance of using child safety seats and bicycle helmets. They meet quarterly and include members similar to our Commission such as police officers, and representatives from insurance companies, and the legal, medical, and law enforcement communities. Officer Lee Linkous, Roanoke County Police Department, is a member of this Board, and if you would like more information or are interested in becoming part of this organization, you can contact him at 540-561-8062. Enclosed for your information is a copy of the November issue of Transportation Safety News which is published by the BRTSB. Again, we appreciate your past efforts to ensure the safety of the all citizens, and hope that you will decide to continue your efforts and become part of the Blue Ridge Transportation and Safety Board. As a small token of our appreciation, we enclose a Certificate of Appreciation for your service to Roanoke County. Sincerely, J seph McNamara, Chairman oanoke County Board of Supervisor cc: Officer Lee Linkous Chief of Police Ray Lavinder Elmer Hodge, County Administrator Advisory Members of the Highway and Transportation Safety Commission BOARD OF SUPERVISORS JOSEPH McNAMARA, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX, VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT JOSEPH B. "BUTCH" CHURCH CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Internet E-Mail ®Recyclad Peper Internet E-Mail ehodge ~www.co.roanoke.va.us bos ~ www.co.roanoke.va.us 4~ ,~ ~4 w 1 ''~i~ Q z O~~C W~ Q O V O Z N V O V W W V W CG i~ E°~ •i.~ ~_ ~ ~ ~ ~ i'L'. ~~ ~4 ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ `,~~ '"5 ~~ ~~ ~a Q t°i a L .N L ~ h o ~ c \ym°., O~ ROANp'YF Z ,~ a C~~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~ 1838 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ELMER C. HODGE FAX (540) 772-2193 JOSEPH McNAMARA, CHAIRMAN (540) 772-2004 WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT November 17 2000 H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX, VICE-CHAIRMAN , CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT JOSEPH B. "BUTCH" CHURCH CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Mr. Jeffrey A. Echols, Resident Engineer Boe L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Virginia Department of Transportation HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT P. O. Box 3071 (540) 772-2005 Salem, VA 24153 Dear Mr. Echols: On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, I would like to thank you for the time you served on the Roanoke County Highway Transportation and Safety Commission. Your contributions to your community through service on this Commission are very much appreciated. This Commission was formed initially to approve grant requests and promote highway and transportation safety programs. Because grants are no longer processed in this manner, and there have been five vacancies on the Commission for some time, the Board decided at our November 14th meeting to abolish this Commission. Instead, the Board wants to refocus our efforts on the Blue Ridge Transportation Safety Board (BRTSB). The BRTSB has members from 16 counties (including Roanoke County), 8 cities and 23 towns, and is currently involved in efforts such as Interstate 81 safety and the importance of using child safety seats and bicycle helmets. They meet quarterly and include members similar to our Commission such as police officers, and representatives from insurance companies, and the legal, medical, and law enforcement communities. Officer Lee Linkous, Roanoke County Police Department, is a member of this Board, and if you would like more information or are interested in becoming part of this organization, you can contact him at 540-561-8062. Enclosed for your information is a copy of the November issue of Transportation Safety News which is published by the BRTSB. Again, we appreciate your past efforts to ensure the safety of the all citizens, and hope that you will decide to continue your efforts and become part of the Blue Ridge Transportation and Safety Board. As a small token of our appreciation, we enclose a Certificate of Appreciation for your service to Roanoke County. Sincerely, /~/lc, eph McNamara, Chairman oanoke County Board of Supervisor cc: Officer Lee Linkous Chief of Police Ray Lavinder Elmer Hodge, County Administrator Advisory Members of the Highway and Transportation Safety Commission Internet E-Mail ®Recycled Papsr Internet E-Mail ehodge®www.co.roanoke.va.us bos®www.co.roanoke.va.us ~4~ w #, ~, fit, '-~--t c~ u .;r ~a a_ z W~ Q O Z O V z N V O v 5 W ~9 W V W 0 CG O W W W a ..~ O .~i V Q Li. VS O ~.r ~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~°' ~~ ~~ r.r ~) 0 c C~ O N • ~, a~ ~~ o ~ `v ~ 0 ms O~ POANp,~.~ 'A ~ c' az Cn~~xx~~ ~~ ~~xxY~a.~.~e 1838 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ELMER C. HODGE FAX (540) 772-2193 JOSEPH McNAMARA, CHAIRMAN (540) 772-2004 November 17, 2000 WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX, VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT JOSEPH B. "BUTCH" CHURCH Training Lt. John Blank CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOBL.JOHNSON Hollins Rescue Squad HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT 6530 Greenway Drive, Apt 104 HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT Roanoke, Va 24019 (5ao) 772-2005 Dear Lt. Blank: On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, I would like to thank you for the time you served on the Roanoke County Highway Transportation and Safety Commission. Your contributions to your community through service on this Commission are very much appreciated. This Commission was formed initially to approve grant requests and promote highway and transportation safety programs. Because grants are no longer processed in this manner, and there have been five vacancies on the Commission for some time, the Board decided at our November 14th meeting to abolish this Commission. Instead, the Board wants to refocus our efforts on the Blue Ridge Transportation Safety Board (BRTSB). The BRTSB has members from 16 counties (including Roanoke County), 8 cities and 23 towns, and is currently involved in efforts such as Interstate 81 safety and the importance of using child safety seats and bicycle helmets. They meet quarterly and include members similar to our Commission such as police officers, and representatives from insurance companies, and the legal, medical, and law enforcement communities. Officer Lee Linkous, Roanoke County Police Department, is a member of this Board, and if you would like more information or are interested in becoming part of this organization, you can contact him at 540-561-8062. Enclosed for your information is a copy of the November issue of Transportation Safety News which is published by the BRTSB. Again, we appreciate your past efforts to ensure the safety of the all citizens, and hope that you will decide to continue your efforts and become part of the Blue Ridge Transportation and Safety Board. As a small token of our appreciation, we enclose a Certificate of Appreciation for your service to Roanoke County. Sincerely, seph McNamara, Chairman oanoke County Board of Supervisor cc: Officer Lee Linkous Chief of Police Ray Lavinder Elmer Hodge, County Administrator Advisory Members of the Highway and Transportation Safety Commission Internet E-Mail ®paeyolad Paper Internet E-Mail ehodge ~ www.co.roanoke.va.us bos ~ www.co.roanoke.va.us 4'~ ~~ ~' w :~ ~~ Q z W~ 0 Q O Z O V 2 F. 0 z N V 2 O V W W V W 0 O W W a x a 0 ~~ ~r l 1 ~~ ~~a ~~~ ~~~ C3 w w~~ ~~~ ~~a ~~"~ '~~-'~ ~~~ ~~ ~. ~ ~A~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~a Cmi 0 -°o a _> H • ~, a~ ~~ J o `off (\f m° of aoaivo~.~ Z '~ ~ z °v a 1838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (540)772-2004 C~.o~~~ ~f ~Zrr~x~~~e Mr. Jay E. Gaylor 1044 Mattie Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24012 Dear Mr. Gaylor: P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (540) 772-2193 November 17, 2000 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS JOSEPH McNAMARA, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT H. ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX, VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT JOSEPH B. "BUTCH" CHURCH CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT (540) 772-2005 On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, I would like to thank you for the time you served on the Roanoke County Highway Transportation and Safety Commission. Your contributions to your community through service on this Commission are very much appreciated. This Commission was formed initially to approve grant requests and promote highway and transportation safety programs. Because grants are no longer processed in this manner, and there have been five vacancies on the Commission for some time, the Board decided at our November 14th meeting to abolish this Commission. Instead, the Board wants to refocus our efforts on the Blue Ridge Transportation Safety Board (BRTSB). The BRTSB has members from 16 counties (including Roanoke County), 8 cities and 23 towns, and is currently involved in efforts such as Interstate 81 safety and the importance of using child safety seats and bicycle helmets. They meet quarterly and include members similar to our Commission such as police officers, and representatives from insurance companies, and the legal, medical, and law enforcement communities. Officer Lee Linkous, Roanoke County Police Department, is a member of this Board, and if you would like more information or are interested in becoming part of this organization, you can contact him at 540-561-8062. Enclosed for your information is a copy of the November issue of Transportation Safety News which is published by the BRTSB. Again, we appreciate your past efforts to ensure the safety of the all citizens, and hope that you will decide to continue your efforts and become part of the Blue Ridge Transportation and Safety Board. As a small token of our appreciation, we enclose a Certificate of Appreciation for your service to Roanoke County. Sincerely, J ~^~o~.c!---- eph McNamara, Chairman oanoke County Board of Supervisor cc: Officer Lee Linkous Chief of Police Ray Lavinder Elmer Hodge, County Administrator Advisory Members of the Highway and Transportation Safety Commission Internet E-Mail ®~~~ Intemet E-Mail ehodge®www.co.roanoke.va.us bos~www.co.roanoke.va.us ~4~ a z~, fit, '-1--t ~~ mod` Q Z •.. W~ Q O V z N V 2 O v W W V D W 0 OC Y. OO W ~ W O W a ~ ~ rr ~1 pp~~ ~~-+f !r~ iG C ~~® ~W~ ~~ ~~a ~~~ ~~~ ~r-; ~c~ ~~ C9 GL~ L .~ L ~ a~ H ~ 0 -a v o ;~ m° w O~ QOANp~~ ~ ,w z c, J `a 7838 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE (540) 772-2004 C~~~n~~ a~ ~n~t~uC~ P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 FAX (540) 772-2193 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS JOSEPH McNAMARA, CHAIRMAN WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT ODELL "FUZZY" MINNIX, VICE-CHAIRMAN CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT JOSEPH B. "BUTCH" CHURCH CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT BOB L. JOHNSON HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT HARRY C. NICKENS VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT November 17, 2000 Mr. David Maxey 3212 Echo Drive Vinton, VA 24179 Dear Mr. Maxey: (540) 772-2005 On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, I would like to thank you for the time you served on the Roanoke County Highway Transportation and Safety Commission. Your contributions to your community through service on this Commission are very much appreciated. This Commission was formed initially to approve grant requests and promote highway and transportation safety programs. Because grants are no longer processed in this manner, and there have been five vacancies on the Commission for some time, the Board decided at our November 14th meeting to abolish this Commission. Instead, the Board wants to refocus our efforts on the Blue Ridge Transportation Safety Board (BRTSB). The BRTSB has members from 16 counties (including Roanoke County), 8 cities and 23 towns, and is currently involved in efforts such as Interstate 81 safety and the importance of using child safety seats and bicycle helmets. They meet quarterly and include members similar to our Commission such as police officers, and representatives from insurance companies, and the legal, medical, and law enforcement communities. Officer Lee Linkous, Roanoke County Police Department, is a member of this Board, and if you would like more information or are interested in becoming part of this organization, you can contact him at 540-561-8062. Enclosed for your information is a copy of the November issue of Transportation Safety News which is published by the BRTSB. Again, we appreciate your past efforts to ensure the safety of the all citizens, and hope that you will decide to continue your efforts and become part of the Blue Ridge Transportation and Safety Board. As a small token of our appreciation, we enclose a Certificate of Appreciation for your service to Roanoke County. Sincerely, seph McNamara, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisor cc: Officer Lee Linkous Chief of Police Ray Lavinder Elmer Hodge, County Administrator Advisory Members of the Highway and Transportation Safety Commission Internet E-Mail ®Recy~lad Pep.r Internet E-Mail ehodge ®www.co. roanoke.va.us bos ~www.co. roanoke.va.us ~~~ w z~ '-~--i w u .~, ~d Q Z W~ 0 Q O Z O V 2 0 z H V OO V W h W V W Q L1C O W W OWC a, d b •r Q ~ ~ ~~~~y Mrl 9d ~~ ~p ~ IJiN ~~ ®~w ~~® w~~ ~~~ ~9 ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ t''1 >_ L .~ H `v 0 m~