Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
3/13/2001 - Regular
Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Department Staffing Allocation Plan ~~ ~ $~ ' '~, ~ ~. ~, ~:; ~. A ~' ~qat~~' Presented by Chief Richard E. Burch, Jr. March 13, 2001 Mary H. Allen M Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Department Staffing Allocation Plan ~'~- •. ~~ P~' ~ ~~ ~~'' ~1G` ~+~+ Cr. Presented by Chief Richard E. Burch, Jr. March 13, 2001 Personnel Plan 3-13-Ol.doc 1 03/09/2001, 4:31 PM n U • U Executive Summary Staffing Allocation Plan Roanoke County Countywide Totals Vinton Cave Catawba Hollins Mount Pleasant Clearbrook Bent Mountain Fort Lewis Back Creek Read Mountain Executive Summary Introduction The Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Department is a combined system servicing our citizens by utilizing career staff Monday thru Friday during daytime hours and volunteers on evenings and weekends. This system has served the county very well in the past. With the changes in the demographics of the county citizens, the need for EMS services has rapidly increased and the fire and rescue services we provide must also change to meet those needs. Nationally the trend has moved toward a low volume of volunteer availability due to personal commitments, such as jobs and education. Roanoke County is not immune to this trend. In order to meet the needs of our citizens, a critical look was taken at existing resources and the placement of those resources. We requested and were given the approval to increase our current field personnel by twenty. A plan to strategically place the new and existing personnel has been developed to better meet the increased need for EMS services throughout the County. • Background Aging population, increased population and community growth over the past several years has resulted in increased call volume for both fire and rescue companies. The consequence of this, combined with reduction of volunteer availability, is call turnover and increased response times. When the next due station has to cover calls into another area, the response time is unavoidably increased in both areas. Coverage at the next due station is decreased by this action as well, utilizing a unit that would otherwise be available in their own first response area. On October 1st, after notification from the City of Salem that their fire and rescue units could no longer respond to the high volume of calls in the county, career staffing was placed on duty 12-hours, 7 days a week in the Fort Lewis station. Through the end of March, we will have incurred approximately $26,000 in overtime expenses. Procedures In order to properly utilize all personnel to the greatest benefit, a complete analysis of EMS calls needed to be completed. Beginning on December 11, 2000, a new dispatch procedure was implemented. The stations were required to mark ambulances as available for calls. The manual tracking of calls began; the dispatchers completed a call report on every call that required an ambulance. The tracking of these calls has continued to date. The analysis of these statistics has provided a good indication of where the career • personnel are needed the most. Personnel Plan 3-13-Ol.doc 2 03/09/2001, 4:31 PM • Results/Discussion At this time, the Cave Spring station demonstrates enough volunteer support that they can adequately provide ALS coverage for their calls. By adding three 24-hour ALS units at three other high volume stations, we project that we will be able to provide 71% of the total County call volume with ALS coverage on a 24-hour basis. These stations are as follows: Station % of Total County Calls Hollins 25.62% Cave Spring 17.65% Vinton 14.15% Fort Lewis 13.94 Total 71.36% The enhanced system will also allow for the increase of career coverage to 12-hour shifts during the weekdays at the following stations: Back Creek Mason's Cove Clearbrook • More supporting information will be provided in the Board of Supervisor worksession. Our original goal was to place five 24-hour ALS units throughout the County, but situations prevented us from attaining that goal with the number of additional personnel approved. We have accomplished a great deal, however, this does not place staffing all stations. We will continue the initial dispatch of units from Vinton and/or Clearbrook for the Mount Pleasant area. Discussions are ongoing with Roanoke City to also provide response into this area. Additionally, no staffing is available to place at the Bent Mountain station. This area will be covered by Back Creek station. Also, calls in the Catawba area will be covered by the Masons Cove station. Conclusion Effective Apri12, 2001, three 24-hour career ALS ambulances will be placed in service to supplement volunteer staff. Additionally, three stations will be increased to 12-hour shifts to have uniform weekday coverage. A total of six stations will receive the benefit of enhanced career coverage. • These changes, with the continued dedicated volunteer support, will provide the best possible services with the available resources to the citizens of Roanoke County. Personnel Plan 3-13-Ol.doc 3 03/09/2001, 4:31 PM • 7.. '. m ~ ^3 ~ ~ 3 .c'« y h~..l.. '~ • ~ ~+v c~ U ~' ~q o °' ~ ~ v o a ~ ~ ~ O a..~ V O a C O ~ ~~ ~ O ~ N N c!~ ~L M L 0 ~ V L m r~ ~~ 'a o ~ ~~ o .~ ~~ U O O 0 0 0 N M U • •s .~ c~ V ~~ O U N . ,~, W O -I--~ ~^ ^~ J ~ ~ O O .~.~ .~ : ~' .. ~-- L ~~ L ~ .~ •- ~ ~ ~ O •- L Z ~,~ ~,~ ~~ ~~ Vl L a.-~ O O Cn a--~ O L ~'~ V L V ._ ca .> U O L ~'~ N O ^~..J L ~ ~ a o U ~~ U O .~ V ca O ~. ~ Q .. .~ 0 N M I..G. ~'~ ~ • •s 0 C~ N N r. ~,~, "~ L W ~ V (n ~ Cn 0 J ~ Q V (~ • - ~ ~ ~ '~ V O a--~ .- ~ .. ~ (n a--~ '~ • - ~ ~ ~ O ~ cn I--- ~. a.., ra ~ o ~ ~ •- - ~ ~~ ~ :~, o a~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~N ~ i C~ ~ • - ~ J ~ ~ ~ Q .~ 4~ MQ ~ ~ W ~}~ V / i V 0 L .~ a~ ._ O O O N M f~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ o .~ V ~ o d Cn ~ ~ an Q~ ~= ~ L (~ ~ i V ~ ~ ~ o a~ - ~~ ~ ~ ~ ._ o - ~ ~ o •- o > .o - -~ ~ c~ ~ ~ ;~ o ~ ~ M U ~'~ ~'~ ~ • •s N N U ^~ ^W W `~ ~~ O V .r~^^ " 1 . ~ ~~ r`1v `' 1 ~`W~j V rv U L ~ ~~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 \° ~ L ~~ O O M ap M r M L1') O O O M O M O O O ~ O O Q Z O ~ i (,~ (n N O M ~ ~ 0 0 0 Cfl O ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ° ~ ~ O N o o ~ h ~ o c \ o o \ o d ~ ~ N O Cfl ~ ~ GNO ~ ~ ~ M Z O L 0 (~ ~ ~ ~ M O ti ~ M ~- r ~ (V r r r d d ~ ~ ~ ~ I` ~ M ~ ~ ~ N ~ O 00 00 O In O O ~ ti ~ ~ L a ~ v .fir L ~ L~ M M ti O O ti ~ ~ M O O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r V V L N ~~ V M ti I` to c0 O M O 00 M - ~ ~- ~ f` ~ In N N O N O N ~ d' ~ ~ M N N N ~ ~ ~ Z 0 O ~ ~ ~ Y ~ C c * ~ cn N ~ f!1 '~ •~ c~ ° ~ 5° ~ a U o 3 +~ V~ V ~- ~ V ~ m U ~ m 0 U 0 b a~ .~ '~ `~ w 0 U b, 0 w 0 .~ U .b .~ a~ 0 A a~i >, 0 a~ b .~ a U H c~ U b ,~ a a a~ >, O O ..., O bA 0 .~ O 0 0 N M .-~ cd • • •s 0 ~~ ^W\ C~ O ~~ r . N `' 1 • ~, ~7 `~v 1 N '~ .,~ O U L L • C ~ M ~ CO r 1~ M ~ ~ In M Z N ~a ~ > ~ Q A, W ~ y C ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 Q 0 O ~ J ~ O CD O ~ CO OD M to Cp ' Z M ~ a ~ (p t1) M N ~ ~ ~ N lf ) M L d a ~ ~ ~ ~ .a = r G ~ ~~+ 00 r Cfl M O N ~ N O N O ~ ,~ Q ~_~ ~ r ~ Z d N Q Y ~ ~ + + L C ~ ~ O ~ O O ~ ~ ti M lf') ~ O Q ao 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ rn M ~ ~ ~ Z ~ y Q C ~ ~ N V ~ ~ ~ ~ M ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ O M ~ L N r r r 00 L Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, •~ O ~ •3 ~ $ L ~ ca O ~ ~ ~ to '++ ~ = - cn O ~ O -~ C o -e c a ~ o V ~ ~ +-' ~ 2 c~ > ~ ~ a~i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~¢ H ¢ (J ~ U ~ O c m (~ ~ m a~ 0 U o ~ ~~ ~ b ~ o .~ Y Q~ .~ w z * * ~ ~-. ~ 0 O ~ N M O ~ U ~ •C o '~ a r ,~ '' o _ `~ v ~ U ~ W ~ O cd .~ v~ U ~ b ~ ~ ' c~ ~ O ~ R ~C •~ ~ ~ V 0 A ~" ~ ~ ~i y ~ O ~ F+ w r3 +' ~ ~ o A ~, -o ~ Y a ~ °' ^o '> o ~ ~ O 'n v~ -d ~ Q ~ ~ ~. a ~ ~ O o. ~ b ~ >, ~ O ~ y ~ ~ •d C/~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ o L a a~ d Q o ~ I ~ b ~ O N Q" , ~ cri Q ~ ~ ~ * * cC u z 0 U N iF • • •s V O • '`, 4.~ V N i.. 'C C1 C C O ev ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d ~ = 2 J (/) ~ N N ~ ~a ~ _ v~ ~ ~ Q h J Q Q Q Q ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ i 3 Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~~ O Q = 0 0 O O O ~ ~ ~ N ~ N N N ,a V N N N r ~- ~ ~ N N N W ~ N ~ N ~ N ~ N ~ ~ ~ r v -a ~ t = L ~ 1~ r M r ~f r N r O Op 00 O ~ 0 0 ~ L a ~ v L ~C ~ d = ~C V ~ O O ~ d ~ 2 = V) ~ N N L ~ ~ `~ Q ~ ~ ~ Q a ¢ a a s a ~ ~ ~ N N~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ O 2 = 2 2 2 = _ ~„i U N r N r O r N r O ~ O ~ O r N ~ N N O O N O O O U L = d ~ a~ ~ N L ~ ~ ~ O O ~ LL') M O O L v a m c ~ ~ ~ Y ~ C ~ m Y N ~ 'co •- cv O ~ .Q c o 3 J ~ o ~ V ~ ~ U ~ o .a 3 ~, _ = ~ ~ ~ o ~ d ~ ~ to ~ U ~ ° ~ ° ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m m U a~ q c~ q 0 U a~ .~ a C". .~ .ti b H >, .b a 0 U Fri U O U U y i~-i 0 id U w 0 a .~ y 0 :~ b td ~.. O b~A w O v 0 w 0 N N P, at ~r a 0 .~ 0 00 Cd .~ O M~ W .-~ 0 N M U • • •s . ,~, ti CJ C~ W V ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ V U c~ ~ ~ O ~ C~ .~-~ ~ J •- Q 4> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y- r~ ~ O O _ \° ~ ~ o •- O ~ O N ~ _ L L ~ ~ ~O ~ cn O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ - ~ -~~o.~ '> a> > o O > _ ~- ~ O (~ !~7 ii ~~~ L 0 Z i N O ~ ~ ~ O ~ .- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O i ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ L ~ ~ ~ V ~ - a~ ~ > ~ ~ V U ~ ~,~ ii •~ (~ ~ ~ ~ a 4~ ~~ O ° ._ ~ ~~ ~ °' 0 V ~ ~ .. vs ~ ~ ~ ~ . ra ~ a~ o 0 .~ > N ~ O Cn V • ~~ a v . ,~ . ,~, ^y `~v 0 n o0 I ' V/ O ~ ~~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ O O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4~ c1') cn .~' ca O" .~..~ O ~ L ~ ~ ~ -~ V cn O ~ (~ ' - ~ 0 (~ ~ O L a.., O V ~ ~ ~ .~ J L ~ ~ ~ o ca ~ O O O ~ O ~ ~ ~ V ~ ~ ~ U ~ LD "O ~ to ~ '~"'' L ~ L ~ ~ ~ O ~ J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ca ra cn ~ cn cn ~ V ~ V 4~ ~ 4~ 4) ._ ._ ._ ._ N -~~ ~~ o >. O o ° Q ~ Q ~ i..1.. ~ U • •s .~ ~~ O C.~ ~~~~~ ~ O .~ ~~ O i (~ ~ ~ ~ 4~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -~ ~ O ~ O ~ _ O .o O U ~ ~ ~ ~ J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O V ~ ~. ca ~ O ~ ~ O V ~° ~ ~ ~ ~= C~ ~ o .~., .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ O .- ~ ~ ~- o ~ ~ 4~ (~ V ,. Q ~ ~ ~ _ a..~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4~ ~ .. O ~ O .~ ~ > O ~ O .a.~ ~ • - om o ° ^~ ~ ~ ~ n ] W M U • Coun wide Volunteer Call Statistics Total Calls in the First Due Areas Units Marked Up and Responded 588 Secondary Units Dispatched 308 Units Marked Up with No Response 22 Units Marked Up with a Delayed Response 49 No Units Marked Up but Unit Responded 87 Units unable to Respond Requiring Second Unit 150 Total Second Emergency calls by Areas Total Second Emergency calls handled by First Due Areas 68 • Total Second Emergency calls Requiring Outside Agency 41 Average Percentage ALS coverage for the County 896 109 33% • • Vinton Volunteer Call Statistics 4 m to Gam weekni hts and Gam Saturda to Gam Monda Total Calls in the First Due Area Unit Marked Up and Responded 110 Secondary Unit Dispatched 36 Unit Marked Up with No Response 2 Unit Marked Up with a Delayed Response 12 No Unit Marked Up but Unit Responded 14 Unit unable to Respond Requiring Second Unit 8 Total Second Emergency calls by Area • Total Second Emergency calls handled by First Due Area 24 Total Second Emergency calls Requiring Outside Agency 5 Percentage ALS coverage by station 146 29 56% • • Cave S rin Volunteer Call Statistics 6 m to Gam weekni hts and Gam Saturda to Gam Monda Total Calls in the First Due Area 140 Unit Marked Up and Responded 129 Secondary Unit Dispatched 11 Unit Marked Up with No Response 0 Unit Marked Up with a Delayed Response 0 No Unit Marked Up but Unit Responded 4 Unit unable to Respond Requiring Second Unit 7 Total Second Emergency calls by Area 19 • Total Second Emergency calls handled by First Due Area 14 Total Second Emergency calls Requiring Outside Agency 5 Percentage ALS coverage by station 66% i• • CatawbalMasons Cove Volunteer Call Statistics 24-Hours, 7 Da s a Week *Total Calls in the First Due Area Please see Tab 10 Masons Cove for included figures. *Figures are included with Masons Cove. • 16 • • Hollins Volunteer Call Statistics 6 m to Gam weekni hts and Gam Saturda to Gam Monda Unit Marked Up and Responded 134 Secondary Unit Dispatched 78 Unit Marked Up with No Response 2 Unit Marked Up with a Delayed Response 10 No Unit Marked Up but Unit Responded 21 Total Calls in the First Due Area 212 Unit unable to Respond Requiring Second Unit 45 i• Total Second Emergency calls by Area Total Second Emergency calls handled by First Due Area 16 Total Second Emergency calls Requiring Outside Agency 22 Percentage ALS coverage by station 38 17% i• • Mount Pleasant Volunteer Call Statistics 24-Hours, 7 Da s a Week Total Calls in the First Due Area Unit Marked Up and Responded 15 Secondary Unit Dispatched 40 Unit Marked Up with No Response 2 Unit Marked Up with a Delayed Response 3 No Unit Marked Up but Unit Responded 19 Unit unable to Respond Requiring Second Unit 16 Total Second Emergency calls by Area • Total Second Emergency calls handled by First Due Area 1 Total Second Emergency calls Requiring Outside Agency 1 Percentage ALS coverage by station 55 2 13% • • Bent Mountain Volunteer Call Statistics 24-Hours, 7 Da s a Week *Total Calls in the First Due Area Unit Marked Up and Responded 5 Secondary Unit Dispatched 25 Unit Marked Up with No Response 0 Unit Marked Up with a Delayed Response 3 No Unit Marked Up but Unit Responded 7 Unit unable to Respond Requiring Second Unit 15 Total Second Emergency calls by Area Total Second Emergency calls handled by First Due Area 0 Total Second Emergency calls Requiring Outside Agency 1 Percentage ALS coverage by station *10 of the 30 calls were outside Roanoke County. 30 1 25% • Fort Lewis Volunteer Call Statistics 6 m to Gam, 7 Da s a Week Total Calls in the First Due Area Unit Marked Up and Responded 41 Secondary Unit Dispatched 29 Unit Marked Up with No Response 3 Unit Marked Up with a Delayed Response 2 No Unit Marked Up but Unit Responded 9 Unit unable to Respond Requiring Second Unit 15 Total Second Emergency calls by Area • Total Second Emergency calls handled by First Due Area 3 Total Second Emergency calls Requiring Outside Agency 0 Percentage ALS coverage by station 70 3 39% i~ I • Masons Cove Volunteer Call Statistics 5 m to lam weekni hts and Gam Saturda to lam Monda Total Calls in the First Due Area 42 Unit Marked Up and Responded 13 Secondary Unit Dispatched 29 Unit Marked Up with No Response 4 Unit Marked Up with a Delayed Response 7 No Unit Marked Up but Unit Responded 4 Unit unable to Respond Requiring Second Unit 14 Total Second Emergency calls by Area 1 • Total Second Emergency calls handled by First Due Area 0 Total Second Emergency calls Requiring Outside Agency 1 Percentage ALS coverage by station 18% i• i• Back Creek Volunteer Call Statistics 5 m to lam weekni hts and Gam Saturda to lam Monda Total Calls in the First Due Area Unit Marked Up and Responded 10 Secondary Unit Dispatched 4 Unit Marked Up with No Response 2 Unit Marked Up with a Delayed Response 0 No Unit Marked Up but Unit Responded 0 Unit unable to Respond Requiring Second Unit 2 Total Second Emergency calls by Area Total Second Emergency calls handled by First Due Area 0 Total Second Emergency calls Requiring Outside Agency 0 Percentage ALS coverage by station 14 0 56% i~ • Read Mountain Volunteer Call Statistics 24-Hours, 7 Da s a Week `Total Calls in the First Due Area Unit Marked Up and Responded 94 *"Secondary Unit Dispatched 44 Unit Marked Up with No Response 7 Unit Marked Up with a Delayed Response 11 No Unit Marked Up but Unit Responded 4 Unit unable to Respond Requiring Second Unit 22 Total Second Emergency calls by Area • Total Second Emergency calls handled by First Due Area 8 Total Second Emergency calls Requiring Outside Agency 2 Percentage ALS coverage by station 138 10 21% *Includes Botetourt County Calls. ""Secondary Unit Dispatched for Read Mountain are calls into Botetourt. No county unit responded. O~ (iOANp~~ ~ ~ p Z ~, °v az 1836 C~~~xxtt~ ~~ ~.~~x~~~.e Working Document-Subject to Revision ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION AGENDA MARCH 13, 2001 ~xr ae rr~ ewe xrore Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m. on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. The meetings are broadcast live on RVTV, Channel 3, will be rebroadcast on Thursdays at 7 P.M. and Saturdays at 4 p.m., and are now closed captioned. Individuals who require assistance or special arrangements to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings should contact the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772-2005 at least 48 hours in advance so reasonable accommodations may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call JPM AND HCN ABSENT AT 3:05 P.M. HCN ARRIVED AT 3:10 P.M. 2. Invocation: John M. Chambliss, Jr. Assistant County Administrator 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS ECH ADDED A REPORT FROM FRED ANDERSON ON PG&E INVESTMENT AS ITEM D-1, MOVED CITIZENS COMMENTS UNTIL AFTER THE WORK SESSION ON FIRE AND RESCUE STAFFING• AND MOVED BOARD INQUIRIES TO THE EVENING SESSION 1 ®Recycled Paper C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Recognition of the Department of Economic Development for winning the Addy Award for, the production of the Center for Research and Technology Digital Marketing Piece. JILL BARR AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STAFF RECOGNIZED D. BRIEFINGS 1. Report on repayment of PG&E Commercial Paper Investment. (Alfred Anderson, County Treasurer) FA ANNOUNCED THAT THE COUNTY RECEIVED THEIR $1 MILLION INVESTMENT PLUS INTEREST FROM PG&E. 1. Annual Report from the Roanoke Valley Economic Development Partnership. (Phil Sparks, Executive Director) PRESENTED BY PHIL SPARKS 2. Briefing by Delegate Morgan Griffith on the pending state 2001-2002 budget. PRESENTED BY DELEGATE MORGAN GRIFFITH E. NEW BUSINESS NONE F. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES NONE G. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Second reading of ordinance amending Chapter 19, Solicitors and 2 Solicitations of the Roanoke County Code, providing for additional definitions, revisions to procedures for applications, investigations, approvals and denials, and prohibitions against solicitations in public roads. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 0-031301-1 HOM MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC WITH JPM ABSENT H. APPOINTMENTS 1. League of Older Americans Advisory Council 2. Roanoke Valley-Alleghany Regional Commission Metropolitan Planning Organization 3. Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission 4. Social Services Advisory Board I. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. R-031301-2 HOM MOTION TO ADOPT CONSENT RESO AFTER DISCUSSION OF ITEM I-9, I-10, AND I-13 URC WITH JPM ABSENT 1. Approval of Minutes -December 19, 2000, January 23, 2001, January 27, 2001. 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the Roanoke Valley-Alleghany Regional Commission Metropolitan Planning Organization. 3 A-031301-2.a 3. Acceptance of Water and Sewer Facilities Serving Winn Dixie Food Store. A-031301-2.b 4. Request from schools for approval of the Roanoke Valley Regional Board budget amendment for 2000-2001 in the amount of $7,121. A-031301-2.c 5. Request from schools for acceptance of $700 Grant from the Virginia Commission for the Arts. A-031301-2.d 6. Acceptance of $5,000 grant from Virginia Tourism Corporation for promotion of Valleyfest. A-031301-2.e 7. Acceptance of $1,000 donation from Fab 5K Race for Green Hill Park improvements. A-031301-2.f 8. Appropriation of $24,250 for Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) Family Violence Intervention Program. A-031301-2.a 9. Resolution initiating the abandonment of Arthur Thurman Road from the Virginia Secondary System of State Highways. R-031301-2.h PMM ADVISED THAT THIS IS A TWO-STEP PROCESS AND THERE MAY BE A PUBLIC HEARING FOR PUBLIC COMMENT. 10. Resolution of Appreciation upon the retirement of Victoria S. Dillard, Department of Social Services. 4 R-031301-2.i 11. Resolution adopting guidelines for the 2001 redistricting of Roanoke County. R-031301-2.i 12. Acceptance of Old Black Horse Road and a portion of Carolina Trail into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. R-031301-2.k 13. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving Belle Grove, Section 2. A-031301-2.1 BLJ ASKED IF ALL ISSUES HAVE BEEN ADDRESS AND THE ROADS HAVE BEEN ACCEPTED INTO THE STATE SYSTEM. PMM ADVISED THAT ISSUES HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED AND HE WILL CHECK ON ROADS J. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS NONE K. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS NONE L. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS HELD AFTER FIRE AND RESCUE STAFFING WORK SESSION 1. Michael Altizer. 3005 Valley Stream Drive Mount Pleasant requested that the Board move forward with financing for Phase 2 of the plan and suggested increasing the decal fee by $5 00 2. Michael Rooa, 3033 Bonsall Lane Mount Pleasant Civic League felt that the proposed plan is flawed and presented comments from the civic league meeting and a petition. 5 3. Annie Krochalis, 8428 Patterson Drive. Bent Mountain President of the Bent Mountain Civic League, .expressed concern about the lack of coverage in Bent Mountain and advised that the communities of Mount Pleasant. Catawba and Bent Mountain have joint together to voice their concern. 4. Bradley Foro. 8235 Poor Mountain Road, Bent Mountain complained that the tax rate on motor homes was excessive and asked that the Board consider SB 115 which allowed motor homes to be taxed at the real estate tax rate of $1.13 instead of the personal property tax rate of $3 50 HOM ASKED ECH AND PMM TO INVESTIGATE AND REPORT BACK TO THE BOARD. 5, Brent Riley, 5280 Wade Road presented a proposed resolution that he asked the Board to consider adopting requesting use of existing pipeline easements where feasible for the Virginia Gas Pipeline HOM ASKED THAT THE ISSUE BE CONSIDERED AT THE EVENING SESSION WHEN THE BOARD HAS HAD TIME TO REVIEW THE PROPOSED RESOLUTION. M. REPORTS BLJ MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE -URC WITH JPM ABSENT General Fund Unappropriated Balance Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance Board Contingency Fund Future School Capital Reserve Report on solid waste collection N. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS (HELD AFTER THE EVENING SESSION Supervisor Johnson expressed concern about the budget dilemma because of decreased state funding for localities because of the car tax, and advised that he supported Senator Bo Trumbo's assessment of the situation. Supervisor Church: (1) concurred with Supervisor Johnson's concerns about impact of the state budget on localities (2) Announced that the Salem-Roanoke County Chamber of Commerce recently named Connie Finnerty, Clearbrook Elementary School as teacher of the year and Ken Broughman as police officer of the year and asked MHA to schedule recognition of them at a future Board meeting Supervisor Minnix: Announced that the Street Light Policy Work Session has been deferred to March 27. O. WORK SESSIONS 1. Work Session to present the Fire and Rescue staffing plan and review call statistics HELD FROM 4:30 TO 6:05 IN BOARD MEETING ROOM PRESENTED BY ECH AND CHIEF BURCH. BOARD CONSENSUS TO BRING BACK STAFFING ALTERNATIVES AND FINANCING OPTIONS TO MOVE FORWARD WITH PHASE 2 INCLUDING INCREASING THE DECAL FEE AND THE 911 TAX. WORK SESSION SCHEDULED FOR 3/27/01 2. Joint budget work session with the School Board and School Administration HELD FROM 6:10 P.M. TO 6:30 P.M. SCHOOL BOARD AND SCHOOL STAFF WERE PRESENT DR. WEBER PRESENTED THE PROPOSED BUDGET. THERE WAS GENERAL DISCUSSION ON THE LOSS OF STATE FUNDING CONSENSUS TO MEET IN WORK SESSION FORMAT AGAIN TO DISCUSS BUDGET SPECIFICS. 3. Work Session to develop guidelines for zoning approvals of private and commercial stables HELD FROM 6:35 - 6:40 P.M. RON SMITH REPRESENTING THE ROANOKE VALLEY HORSEMENS' ASSOCIATION WAS PRESENT. BOARD CONSENSUS TO MAKE NO CHANGES BUT REQUESTED ASSISTANCE FROM MR. SMITH WITH SUCH ISSUES AS MANURE AND ODOR PROBLEMS WHICH CAUSED COMPLAINTS FROM NEIGHBORS. 4. Proposed amendments to the Street Light Policy DEFERRED TO 3/27/01 P. CLOSED MEETING pursuant to Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344A (3) acquisition or sale of publicly held property, i.e. Lloyd Property, Salem Bank and Trust, Salem Office Supply, HOM MOTION TO GO INTO CLOSED MEETING AT 6:10 P.M. FOLLOWING WORK SESSIONS. URC WITH JPM ABSENT CLOSED MEETING HELD FROM 6:45 P.M. TO 7:10 P.M. EVENING SESSION Q. CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION R-031301-3 HOM MOTION TO RETURN TO OPEN SESSION AND ADOPT CERTIFICATION RESO -URC WITH JPM ABSENT AND BLJ ABSENT FOR A PORTION OF THE CLOSED MEETING R. NEW BUSINESS Report and recommendation concerning the acquisition of real estate located at 220 East Main Street, Salem, Virginia, known as the Salem Bank and Trust Building. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) s R-031301-4 HOM MOTION TO PROCEED WITH FINALIZING PURCHASE AND FINANCING PACKAGE AYES-JBC,HCN,HOM ABSENT-JPM ABSTAIN-BLJ 1 CITIZEN SPOKE S. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Second reading of ordinance accepting an offer for and authorizing the sale of 37.86 acres of real estate located in the City of Salem - The Lloyd Property, Tax Map No. 194-1-1. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 1ACTION CONTINUED FROM 2/13/01 AND 2/27/01 CONTINUED TO 3/27/01 T. BUDGET PRESENTATIONS 1. Requests from Social Services, Cultural and Tourism agencies for inclusion in the FY2001-2002 budget. (Brent Robertson, Budget Director) 52 AGENCIES SPOKE REQUESTING FUNDS ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION TO THE SCC CONCERNING THE VIRGINIA GAS PIPELINE R-031301-5 HOM MOTION THAT STAFF PREPARE A RESOLUTION TO BE SENT TO THE SCC. URC WITH JPM ABSENT U. ADJOURNMENT HOM ADJOURNED MEETING AT 10:25 P M 9 ~ R AN ,~. F Z p a~ 1838 (~.aixx~#~ ~f ~~~t~~C~ ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA MARCH 13, 2001 ti~rrr cF nff ecuE xro~ Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m. on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. The meetings are broadcast live on RVTV, Channel 3, will be rebroadcast on Thursdays at 7 P.M. and Saturdays at 4 p.m., and are now closed captioned. Individuals who require assistance or special arrangements to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings should contact the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772-2005 at least 48 hours in advance so reasonable accommodations may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call 2. Invocation: John M. Chambliss, Jr. Assistant County Administrator 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Recognition of the Department of Economic Development for winning the Addy Award for the production of the Center for Research and Technology Digital Marketing Piece. D. BRIEFINGS 1. Annual Report from the Roanoke Valley Economic Development Partnership. (Phil Sparks, Executive Director) 1 ® Recycled Paper 2. Briefing by Delegate Morgan Griffith on the pending state 2001-2002 budget. E. NEW BUSINESS F. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES G. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Second reading of ordinance amending Chapter 19, Solicitors and Solicitations of the Roanoke County Code, providing for additional definitions, revisions to procedures for applications, investigations, approvals and denials, and prohibitions against solicitations in public roads. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) H. APPOINTMENTS 1. League of Older Americans Advisory Council 2. Roanoke Valley-Alleghany Regional Commission Metropolitan Planning Organization 3. Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission 4. Social Services Advisory Board I. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. 1F DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Approval of Minutes -December 19, 2000, January 23, 2001, January 27, 2001. 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the Roanoke Valley- 2 Alleghany Regional Commission Metropolitan Planning Organization. 3. Acceptance of Water and Sewer Facilities Serving Winn Dixie Food Store. 4. Request from schools for approval of the Roanoke Valley Regional Board budget amendment for 2000-2001 in the amount of $7,121. 5. Request from schools for acceptance of $700 Grant from the Virginia Commission for the Arts. 6. Acceptance of $5,000 grant from Virginia Tourism Corporation for promotion of Valleyfest. 7. Acceptance of $1,000 donation from Fab 5K Race for Green Hill Park improvements. 8. Appropriation of $24,250 for Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) Family Violence Intervention Program. 9. Resolution initiating the abandonment of Arthur Thurman Road from the Virginia Secondary System of State Highways. 10. Resolution of Appreciation upon the retirement of Victoria S. Dillard, Department of Social Services. 11. Resolution adopting guidelines for the 2001 redistricting of Roanoke County. 12. Acceptance of Old Black Horse Road and a portion of Carolina Trail into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 13. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving Belle Grove, Section 2. J. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS K. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS L. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS 3 M. REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Future School Capital Reserve 5. Report on solid waste collection N. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS O. WORK SESSIONS 1. Work Session to present the Fire and Rescue staffing plan and review call statistics 2. Joint budget work session with the School Board and School Administration 3. Work Session to develop guidelines for zoning approvals of private and commercial stables 4. Proposed amendments to the Street Light Policy P. CLOSED MEETING pursuant to Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344A (3) acquisition or sale of publicly held property, i.e. Lloyd Property, Salem Bank and Trust, Salem Office Supply. EVENING SESSION Q. CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION R. NEW BUSINESS 1. Report and recommendation concerning the acquisition of real estate located at 220 East Main Street, Salem, Virginia, known as the Salem Bank and Trust Building. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) 4 S. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Second reading of ordinance accepting an offer for and authorizing the sale of 37.86 acres of real estate located in the City of Salem - The Lloyd Property, Tax Map No. 194-1-1. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) (ACTION CONTINUED FROM 2/13/01 AND 2/27/01 T. BUDGET PRESENTATIONS 1. Requests from Social Services, Cultural and Tourism agencies for inclusion in the FY2001-2002 budget. (Brent Robertson, Budget Director) U. ADJOURNMENT 5 ~' s --~.. ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER C- I AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 13, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: Recognition of the Department of Economic Development for Winning the Addy Award for the Production of the Center for Research and Technology Digital Marketing Piece. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: This is an excellent opportunity to commend Jill Barr, Melinda Cox and the Economic Development staff for the outstanding job they did on the compact disk and on the Opening Ceremonies for CRT in October 2000. BACKGROUND: In the fall of 2000, the Department of Economic Development directed the production of a compact disc and direct mail marketing piece for the Center for Research and Technology (CRT). Designed to promote the Center as an attractive location for technology related businesses, the piece has assisted in generating substantial interest in the CRT. To date the office has completed direct mailings to over 250 technology companies, corporate real estate executives and development consultants and allies throughout the U.S. These mailings have resulted in several contacts from prospects considering locating their businesses at CRT. The compact disc is a key component of the marketing efforts of the Department and serves as an impressive economic development recruitment tool for the County. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The CRT marketing piece won the coveted Addy award in the 2000-01 Western Virginia awards ceremony sponsored by the Advertising Federation of the Roanoke Valley and the Ad Club of Central Virginia. Access Advertising Agency, producer of the piece, submitted the award on the County's behalf under the Direct Marketing -Business-to-Business category. Advertising companies throughout the Lynchburg, New River and Roanoke regions submitted over 400 submissions in 70 categories in the Western Virginia Addy awards program. Entries varied from public relations campaigns, brochures, pamphlets, websites and other advertising pieces. First place winners in each ~.-~ ~- category are presented with the Addy award, and other significant entries are awarded silver and bronze awards. The Department of Economic Development is proud to be the recipient of this prestigious award and the staff will be present at the meeting with the award they received. Respectfully Submitted by ~~o Q. G' Daniel R. O'Donnell Assistant County Administrator Approved by: ~~~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE No. Yes Abs Approved () Motion by: Church Denied () Johnson Received () McNamara Referred () Minnix To () Nickens cc: File ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 13, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: Annual Report from the Roanoke Valley Economic Development Partnership COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Phil Sparks, Executive Director of the Roanoke Valley Economic Development Partnership, has requested time on the agenda to present the Partnership's Annual Report. There will be also be a brief power point presentation. C~~ .-~ Elmer C. Hodge ' County Administrator ACTION Approved () Motion by: Church Denied () Johnson Received () McNamara Referred () Minnix To () Nickens VOTE No. Yes Abs cc: File ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~ ' ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMII~IISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 13, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: PG&E Commercial Paper Investment Repaid, plus interest COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Staff members have monitored the status of this issue since our initial report. to you at the February 13, 2001 meeting. We are pleased to report that PG&E has paid off their debt to the County with interest. BACKGROUND: On December 5, 2000 invested $989,447.22 to purchase $1,000,000 of commercial paper of PG&E Corporation. The maturity date was February 1, 2001. This purchase was made in compliance with the County Investment Policy and the Code of Virginia. As reported in at the February 13, 2001 Board of Supervisors meeting, the paper did not pay off on the maturity date of February 1, 2001. The County Administrator, the County Attorney, the Chief Financial and the County staffworked vigorously in pursing all options available to the County. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: At the time the Roanoke County staff is pleased to announce the County has received the investment of $1,000,000 back in full plus $5,734.90 in interest for a total of $1,005,734.90 as of March 12, 2001. Respectfully Submitted by: Alfred C. Anderson Treasurer, Roanoke County Approved by: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ,,' ACTION VOTE No. Yes Abs Approved () Motion by: Church Denied () Johnson _ _ _ Received O McNamara- _ _ Referred O Minnix _ _ _ To () Nickens _ _ _ ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 13, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: Briefing from Delegate Morgan Griffith on the 2001-2002 state budget COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Delegate Morgan Griffith has requested time on the agenda to brief the Board of Supervisors on the pending state 2001-2002 budget and any potential impact the budget has on the County of Roanoke. At that time, he will also address any questions or concerns you may have. ~r,n,w~' ~ 0_ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE No. Yes Abs Approved () Motion by: Church Denied () Johnson Received () McNamara Referred () Minnix To () Nickens cc: File vs:aiau xva~ei~wc acwaae ~- 3•. _ ~"~ `=~ ri~v ~s~a~i~ve March 2, 2001 Bulletin # 16 Impact of State Budget Situation on Localities We know that local officials are in a difficult situation trying to understand the effect that the state budget situation has on their ability to reconcile their local budget for this year and develop a budget for next year. The situation is unprecedented, and it is impossible for VML to advise localities regarding specific budget assumptions, other than to suggest that they be as conservative as possible. To assist localities in assessing the situation, we are providing the following information. It highlights the state funding that is most at risk, and may help you to explain to your citizens the potential effect on services if state funding for neat year is governed by the 2000 State Appropriations Act adopted in March 2000. Gov. Jim Gilmore has said he will submit budget amendments to the 2000 Appropriations Act in a special session of the General Assembly, expected to occur in late March. It is impossible to predict whether such a session will occur much less what the outcome of the special session might be. The governor remains committed to increasing the car tax reimbursement level to 70%, while the Senate is equally firm in its position that the state cannot afford to increase car tax relief to that extent without cutting essential services and failing to meet its commitments to local governments. Here's what we do know: • Without a budget agreement, the budget that was adopted in March 2000 will remain in effect. • The Governor's recent Executive Order says that $421 million will have to be cut to balance the 2000-2002 biennial budget. The budget shortfall estimated for fiscal year 2000-2001 alone is $189 million. • The only authority the Governor has under this scenario is to reduce appropriations so that they are in line with current revenue estimates. Items of interest to local governments that were included in the proposed budget amendments submitted by the governor in December 2000 are listed below. Some of these are entitlement or sum sufficient programs, which means that the state has an obligation to fully fund them regardless of the amount in the budget. Nonetheless the amounts shown for these programs reflect the magnitude of cuts that would have to be made in other areas to fully fund the sum-sufficient programs. This could result in reductions in other programs that affect local governments. Without a budget agreement, funding_ ag~ps of this magnitude cannot be addressed: • Mental retardation waiver emergencies ($35.7 million) • Mental health and mental retardation facilities ($12.7 million) • Comprehensive Services Act funding gap ($61.1 million) • Foster care maintenance and adoption payments ($11.7 million) 13 East Franklin Street • Nost Office Box 12164 • 804/649-8471 Fax: 804/343-3758 E-Mail: e-mailC~vml,org ~ -~. • Per diems for prisoners in local and regional jails ($26.3 million) • Operating costs in juvenile detention centers ($9.3 million) • State share capital costs for new juvenile detention centers ($8.7 million) Items of interest to local governments that were included in either the Senate or the House budget bills that did not pass the 2001 General Assembly are listed below. Without a budget agreement none of these items will be funded: • Teacher salary increases ($82 million -Senate; $48 million House) • Salaries for state-supported local employees ($13.6 million -Senate and House) • Additional per diem for prisoners in local and regional jails ($12.5 million -Senate) Based on the above examples it is clearly in the best interest of local governments if the governor and General Assembly reach a budget ^ .cement that is based on maintaining essential services and meeting the state's obligations in the areas of education and human services. Priority should be given to adequately funding existing programs and funding salaries for teachers and state-supported local employees. Absent a budget agreement, state agencies have been ordered to develop recommendations to reduce spending by up to 15 percent. These plans are due to the governor March 2. The governor has said that elementary and secondary education and essential human service programs would be exempt from these cuts. The Richmond Times Dispatch has reported that the governor's chief of staff Boyd Marcus expects to disclose those plans in the next few weeks. The extent to which these proposed cuts are implemented would appear to depend on whether the governor and General Assembly agree on some alternative budget plan during the special session. VRS has confirmed that the current budget impasse has no effect on the revised contribution rates that were approved by the VRS Board for 2002 and sent to localities previously. These rates can take effect without any action by the General Assembly. This is not the case with regard to teacher retirement contribution rates. VR.S is working with the Department of Education and the Department of Planning and Budget to determine what authority the governor may have to implement the lower rates without General Assembly action. The Dept. of Education expects to issue a memorandum to school divisions next week advising them about education funding levels. We will keep you advised of further budget developments as they occur. • VACo legislative newsletter Page 1 ot"l ~-~. Ca itol Contact p Virginia Association of Counties February 26, 2001 1001 E. Broad St. SU LL 20 Richmond, Va. 23219 (804) 788-6652 fax (804) 788-0083 For more information about the General Assembly or if you cannot read today's Capitol Contact, please visit this link: htt~//www.institute_vi~inia.eduNAC°/~;a.htm. Governor signs executive order to balance state budget, General Assembly to meet again in March The 2001 General Assembly adjourned on Feb. 24 without having enacted a budget bill, and Gov. James Gilmore immediately signed Executive Order 74 to bring appropriations and estimated revenues into balance for the remainder of the biennium. The lack of a budget agreement by the 2001 General Assembly means that the 2000 Appropriations Act approved by the 2000 General Assembly becomes the budget by default. The 2000 Appropriations Act was predicated on estimates of revenue growth totaling 5.5% in FY 2001 and 6.9% in FY 2002. Due to slower than expected economic growth, the growth estimates are now 3.8% in FY 2001 and 7% in FY 2002. Therefore, in order for revenue to match expenditures in the biennial budget, expenditure reductions are required, precipitating Executive Order ?4. Executive Order 74 directs the director of the Department of Planning and Budget to withhold up to 15% of the annual general fund appropriation for individual state agencies, departments, institutions and nonstate agencies. The governor also directed that no funding shall be withheld from direct aid to K-12 education or essential health and human services. Executive Order 74 also freezes capital projects funded through the state's general fund. The Director of DPB must report his action to the Chairmen of the House Appropriations Committee and Senate Finance Committee no later than March 10. The planned car tax reductions at 70% in Calendar Year 2001 and 100% in Calendar Year 2002 will remain; they are a part of the adopted 2000 Appropriations Act. The budget amendments made pursuant to Executive Order 74 will be considered by the General Assembly at a special session to be called in late March (the date has not yet been announced). Executive Order 74 is in effect until June 30, 2002, until such time that it is amended, rescinded or superseded by law (e.g., the General Assembly adopting another version of the budget at the March special session which gets signed by the governor). Localities are reminded that the best numbers available for developing local budgets are still the numbers distributed in early January, based on the governor's introduced budget. However, they should be advised to look out for certain shared state/local programs, such as constitutional officers, in the days ahead as the details of Executive Order 74 get implemented. file://C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\Con2 26.html 02/28/2001 ~1~~Co legislative newsletter Page 2 of 2 ~` For information, questions or comments, please contact Ellen Davenport at (804) 343-2503 or at edaven~ort cr,va.co_o~. How did we do? Here's your chance to tell us whether you thought Capitol Contact provided useful, informative and timely information on the 2001 General Assembly. Did we publish often enough, too often or just about the right number of times to keep you up-to-date on the latest news? Did you use the phone numbers of legislators to contact them about bills important to your county? Did you click on the e- mail addresses to follow up with questions to our legislative liaisons? Was the method of delivery by e-mail or fax satisfactory? Let us know your thoughts by sending them to Ruth Richey at rriche a v_aco.org or fax to (804) 788-0083. file://C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\Con2 26.html 02/28/2001 :. ~~ - AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 13, 2001 ORDINANCE 031301-1 AMENDING CHAPTER 19, SOLICITORS AND SOLICITATIONS, OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE, PROVIDING FOR ADDITIONAL DEFINITIONS, REVISIONS TO PROCEDURES FOR APPLICATIONS, INVESTIGATIONS, APPROVALS, AND DENIALS, AND PROHIBITIONS AGAINST SOLICITATIONS IN PUBLIC ROADS WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors finds that a dangerous condition has developed on the public streets and highways in Roanoke County, with solicitors seeking donations from operators of motor vehicles while in the street, from the curbside or from the median; and, WHEREAS, many of these solicitors are children who do not appreciate the danger from moving vehicles among several lanes of traffic or from the obstruction of traffic arising from these solicitations; and, WHEREAS, these solicitations pose a threat to public health, safety and welfare of the citizens of the County; and, WHEREAS, this ordinance is adopted pursuant to the authority found in Section 15.2- 1200, and Section 57-63 of the Code of Virginia, and Section 2.01 of the Roanoke County Charter; and, WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 27, 2001, and the second reading was held on March 13, 2001. BE IT ORDAINED, By the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Chapter 19, SOLICITORS AND SOLICITATIONS, is amended to read as follows: Sec. 19-1. Definition. For the purpose of this chapter, the term "solicitation" shall mean and include any one or more of the following activities: (1) Seeking to obtain orders for the purchase of goods, wares, merchandise, foodstuffs or services of any kind, character or description. (2) Seeking to obtain prospective customers for application for, or purchase of, insurance of any type, kind or character. A . (3) Seeking to obtain subscriptions to books, magazines, periodicals, newspapers or any other type or kind of publication. (4) Seeking to obtain contributions for charitable nonprofit organizations or selling any goods, wares, merchandise or other things for the benefit of such an organization. (5) Seeking to obtain donations for individual usage by requesting food, money or any other goods or offering services for these goods. Sec. 19-4. Soliciting prohibited during certain hours and locations. (a) It shall be unlawful for any person to engage in solicitation in the county at any time prior to 9:00 a.m. or after ~A:66 9:00 p.m. (b) It shall be unlawful for any person to engage in solicitation from any operator orpassenger of a motor vehicle that is in traffic on a public road. A public road shall include the areas of the median and the public right-of--way along the curbside. ARTICLE II. PERMIT FOR CHARITABLE SOLICITATIONS Sec. 19-21. Required; exceptions. (a) It shall be unlawful for any person to make any solicitation for the benefit of a charitable nonprofit organization, unless a permit for such solicitation has been issued pursuant to the provisions of this article. This requirement shall apply to any such solicitation made , in any public or private place or by mail or telephone. (b) The provisions of this section shall not apply to any solicitation conducted only among the members of the organization involved by other members or officers thereof, voluntarily and without remuneration for such solicitation, or to any solicitation in the form of collection of contributions as the regular exercises or services of any church, religious society, lodge, benevolent order or fraternity or similar organization, or of any branch thereof. Membership drives of any organization, either among active or prospective members, shall not be considered to be solicitations for the purposes of this section. Sec.19-22. Application. Any person desiring a permit required by this article shall file a written application therefor with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. Such application shall contain the following information: (1) The applicant's name and address and the name and address of the organization for the benefit of which the solicitation is to be made. 2 .. . (2) The name and address of the principal officer or manager of the applicant, if the applicant is other than an individual. (3) The purpose for which any receipts derived from the solicitation are to be used. (4) The name of the person by whom the receipts of the solicitation will be received and disbursed. (5) The name and address of the person who will be in direct charge of conducting the solicitation. (6) An outline of the method to be used in conducting the solicitation. (7) The time during which the solicitation will be made, giving the proposed dates for the beginning and ending of the solicitation, which time period shall not exceed s»c#q-f66j ninety (90) days. (8) A full statement of the character and extent of the charitable, educational or philanthropic work being done within the county by the organization for the benefit of which the solicitation is to be made. (9) The federal tax employer identification number. (10) State and federal tax-exempt identification numbers. (11) Such other information as may be required by the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors in order for him to fully determine the kind, character and worthiness of the proposed solicitation and for the security of the county and its inhabitants. Sec. 19-23. Investigation as to purposes of proposed solicitation. Upon receipt of an application for a permit under this article, the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors shall make or cause to be made, within a reasonable period of time, such investigation as he deems necessary in regard thereto to determine that the proposed solicitation is, in fact, to be conducted for nonprofit purposes. Sec. 19-24. Issuance or denial. (a) Upon approval of an application for a permit under this article, the ee~p Clerk to the Board of Supervisors shall issue the permit authorizing the solicitation described in such application. (b) If the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors disapproves the application, he shall deny the permit. In such case, the applicant shall, upon request, be 3 ~. granted a hearing by the county administrator. (c) Upon investigation if it has been determined the applicant has previously violated any section of this code then the application shall automatically be denied. (d) Ifthe countyadministratorstill denies the application, the applicantshall, upon request, be granted a hearing before the Board of Supervisors. Sec. 19-25. Does not constitute endorsement by county or Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. No permit issued under this article shall, in any case, be construed as, or be deemed to be, an endorsement by the county or the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors of any of the solicitation or of the purpose for which the same is made. Sec. 19-26. Not transferable. A permit issued under this article shall be nontransferable; provided, however, that this shall not prevent any permittee from using such number of solicitors as are required to conduct the solicitation. Sec.19-27. Revocation. (a) If, upon receipt of written information or upon his own investigation, the eet~rty ~d-rs#~~er Clerk to the Board of Supervisors shall find: (1) That the holder of a permit issued under this article, or any agent or representative of such holder, is making or has made misrepresentations or untrue statements in conducting the authorized solicitation; or (2) That such solicitation has been or is being conducted in a manner inconsistent or not in conformity with the intent and purpose of this chapter or in a manner which endangers the health, life or property of the citizens of the county; or (3) That any person connected with such solicitation is making or has made any representation that such permit is an endorsement of the solicitation; (a) the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors shall revoke such permit and it shall thereafter be unlawful for any person to make any solicitation pursuant thereto. (b) Before any permit is revoked under this section, the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors shall give the permittee a minimum of twenty-four (24) hours' notice, in writing, that a hearing is to be had before the county administrator and that, at such hearing, the county administrator shall ascertain the facts, and if any reason above set 4 .. . forth for revoking the permit is found to exist, the permit shall be revoked by the eaarrty Clerk to the Board of the Supervisors. (c) If the county administrator agrees with revocation of the permit the permittee shall be allowed to appeal to the Board of Supervisors whereas the Board will review the facts and determine whether is justification for the permit to be revoked. 2. That this ordinance is effective from and after the date of its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor McNamara A COPY TESTE: mom- ..~ Q..ee~.__ Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors 5 .. . cc: File Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Mary H. Allen, Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk to the Board Wanda Riley, Executive Secretary, Policy Manual Circuit Court Clifford R. Weckstein, Judge Diane McQ. Strickland, Judge Richard C. Pattisall, Judge Robert P. Doherty, Jr., Judge Jonathan M. Apgar, Judge Steven A. McGraw, Clerk Juvenile Domestic Relations District Court Joseph M. Clarke, II, Judge Philip Trompeter, Judge John B. Ferguson, Judge Joseph P. Bounds, Judge Ruth P. Bates, Clerk Intake Counsellor General District Court George W. Harris, Judge William Broadhurst, Judge Vincent Lilley, Judge Julian H. Raney, Judge Jacqueline F. Ward Talevi, Judge Theresa A. Childress, Clerk Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney Magistrates Sherri Krantz/Betty Perry Main Library Ray Lavinder, Police Chief Richard Burch, Chief of Fire & Rescue Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke 24016 Roanoke County Law Library, Singleton Osterhoudt Roanoke County Code Book Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator Dan O'Donnell, Assistant County Administrator Diane D. Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer Kathie Scearce, Director, Community Relations Danial Morris, Director, Finance O. Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Terrance L. Harrington, County Planner Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Michael Lazzuri, Court Services Elaine Carver, Director, Information Technology Anne Marie Green, Director, General Services Thomas S. Haislip, Director, Parks, Recreation & Tourism Gardner Smith, Director, Procurement William E. Driver Director, Real Estate Valuation Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue i . ACTION NO. ITEM NO . ""' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 13, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 19, SOLICITORS AND SOLICITATIONS, THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE, PROVIDING FOR ADDITIONAL DEFINITIONS, REVISIONS TO PROCEDURES FOR APPLICATIONS, INVESTIGATIONS, APPROVALS, AND DENIALS, AND PROHIBITIONS AGAINST SOLICITATIONS IN PUBLIC ROADS. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: /~ ~ B ~~ti,~ ~rs~s A~~ BACKGROUND: The County Attorney's Office has been requested to prepare an ordinance to address problems with roadside solicitations and threats to public safety arising from such activities. The Police Department has been concerned that allowing individuals or organizations to stand on the median or the curbside of public roads causes traffic flow problems and puts motorist and solicitors in harm. The Clerk of the Board of Supervisors has received many complaints from citizens that they are concerned for their safety because some persons and solicitors have approached cars at traffic lights seeking money. She also requested that revisions be made on the application process, investigations, and approvals and denials of permits and the appeals of the denials to make the permit process more efficient. Lastly, the Commonwealth's Attorney asks that the definition of solicitation be amended to include individuals. These requests are based on the concerns for public safety by the Commonwealth's Attorney, the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors, and the Chief of the Police Department. Violations of the solicitation ordinance are a Class 4 misdemeanor - a fine of not more than $250. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This is a second reading of the an ordinance amending Chapter 19 of the Roanoke County Code, as a result of concerns addressed by the Commonwealth's Attorney, the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors, and the County Police Chief. Revisions and amendments are as follows: G:\ATTORNEY\PMM\AGENDA\solicitationBRl.wpd .- - § 19-1 (5) is an addition to the current definition of solicitation to include seeking donations for an individual usage, - § 19-4 eliminates solicitation on the public road, which includes the median and public right-of-way, and shortens the length of time in which one can solicit during the day, - § 19-22 revises the application process. The permits are approved by the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors instead of the County Administrator and the length of the permit is valid for ninety (90) days instead of sixty (60) , - The Clerk to the Board of Supervisors will conduct the investigation in the revisions to § 19-23, - § 19-25 is amended to allow for an in-depth appeal process to best suit the needs of the permit petitioner. - §19-27 allows for appeals of revoked permits to extend beyond the County Administrator to the Board of Supervisors. FISCAL IMPACTS: None STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the Board favorably consider the adoption and approval of the first reading of this ordinance. Respectfully submitted, ~~~~,~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney G:\ATTORNEY\PMM\AGENDA\solicitationBRl.wpd 2 Y7 a t ~ atl Action Vote No Yes Abs Approved () Motion by Church Denied () Johnson Received () McNamara Referred Minnix to Nickens G:\ATTORNEY\PMM\AGENDA\solicitationBRl.wpd ~. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 13, 2001 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 19, SOLICITORS AND SOLICITATIONS, OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE, PROVIDING FOR ADDITIONAL DEFINITIONS, REVISIONS TO PROCEDURES FOR APPLICATIONS, INVESTIGATIONS, APPROVALS, AND DENIALS, AND PROHIBITIONS AGAINST SOLICITATIONS IN PUBLIC ROADS ~~"! WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors finds that a dangerous condition has developed on the public streets and highways in Roanoke County, with solicitors seeking donations from operators of motor vehicles while in the street, from the curbside or from the median; and, WHEREAS, many of these solicitors are children who do not appreciate the danger from moving vehicles among several lanes of traffic or from the obstruction of traffic arising from these solicitations; and, WHEREAS, these solicitations pose a threat to public health, safety and welfare of the citizens of the County; and, WHEREAS, this ordinance is adopted pursuant to the authority found in Section 15.2-1200, and Section 57-63 of the Code of Virginia, and Section 2.01 of the Roanoke County Charter; and, WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 27, 2001, and the second reading was held on March 13, 2001. BE IT ORDAINED, By the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Chapter 19, SOLICITORS AND SOLICITATIONS, is amended to read as follows: Sec. 19-1. Definition. For the purpose of this chapter, the term "solicitation" shall mean and include any one or more of the following activities: (1) Seeking to obtain orders for the purchase of goods, wares, merchandise, foodstuffs or services of any ,kind, character or description. (2) Seeking to obtain prospective customers for application G:\ATTORNEY\PMM\AGENDA\solicitamend.ord.wpd 1 for, or purchase of, insurance of any type, kind or character. ~~i (3) Seeking to obtain subscriptions to books, magazines, periodicals, newspapers or any other type or kind of publication. (4) Seeking to obtain contributions for charitable nonprofit organizations or selling any goods, wares, merchandise or other things for the benefit of such an organization. (5) Seeking to obtain donations for individual usage by requesting food, money or any other goods or offering services for these goods. Sec. 19-4. Soliciting prohibited during certain hours and locations. (a) It shall be unlawful for any person to engage in solicitation in the county at any time prior to 9:00 a.m. or after ~~ 9:00 p.m. (b) It shall be unlawful for any person to engage in solicitation from any operator or passenger of a motor vehicle that is in traffic on a public road. A public road shall include the areas of the median and the public right-of-way along the curbside. ARTICLE II. PERMIT FOR CHARITABLE SOLICITATIONS Sec. 19-21. Required; exceptions. (a) It shall be unlawful for any person to make any solicitation for the benefit of a charitable nonprofit organization, unless a permit for such solicitation has been issued pursuant to the provisions of this article. This requirement shall apply to any such solicitation made rn_ ~___ _ __ . - -- , in any public or private place or by mail or telephone. (b) The provisions of this section shall not apply to any solicitation conducted only among the members of the organization involved by other members or officers thereof, voluntarily and without remuneration for such solicitation, or to any solicitation in the form of collection of contributions as the regular exercises or services of any church, religious society, lodge, benevolent order or fraternity or similar organization, or of any branch thereof. Membership drives of any organization, either among active or prospective members, shall not be considered to be solicitations for the purposes of this section. G:\ATTORNEY\PMM\AGENDA\solicitamend.ord.wpd 2 r Sec. 19-22. Application. a' Any person desiring a permit required by this article shall file a written application therefor with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. Such application shall contain the following information: (1) The applicant's name and address and the name and address of the organization for the benefit of which the solicitation is to be made. (2) The name and address of the principal officer or manager of the applicant, if the applicant is other than an individual. (3) The purpose for which any receipts derived from the solicitation are to be used. (4) The name of the person by whom the receipts of the solicitation will be received and disbursed. (5) The name and address of the person who will be in direct charge of conducting the solicitation. (6) An outline of the method to be used in conducting the solicitation. (7) The time during which the solicitation will be made, giving the proposed dates for the beginning and ending of the solicitation, which time period shall not exceed ninety (90) days . (8) A full statement of the character and extent of the charitable, educational or philanthropic work being done within the county by the organization for the benefit of which the solicitation is to be made. (9) The federal tax employer identification number. (10) State and federal tax-exempt identification numbers. (11) Such other information as may be required by the covrr~y __________________ Clerk to the Board of Supervisors in order for him to fully determine the kind, character and worthiness of the proposed solicitation and for the security of the county and its inhabitants . Sec. 19-23. Investigation as to purposes of proposed solicitation. G:\ATTORNEY\PMM\AGENDA\solicitamend.ord.wpd 3 ' r ~ Upon receipt of an application the Clerk to make or cause to be made, within a investigation as he deems necessary that the proposed solicitation is, nonprofit purposes. ~~ for a permit under this article, the Board of Supervisors shall reasonable period of time, such in regard thereto to determine in fact, to be conducted for Sec. 19-24. Issuance or denial. (a) Upon approval of an application for a permit under this article, the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors shall issue the permit authorizing the solicitation described in such application. (b) If the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors disapproves the application, he shall deny the permit. In such case, the applicant shall, upon request, be granted a hearing by the county administrator. (c) Upon investigation if it has been determined the applicant has previously violated any section of this code then the application shall automatically be denied. (d) If the county administrator still denies the application, the applicant shall, upon request, be granted a hearing before the Board of Supervisors. Sec. 19-25. Does not constitute endorsement by county or Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. No permit issued under this article shall, in any case, be construed as, or be deemed to be, an endorsement by the county or the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors of any of the solicitation or of the purpose for which the same is made. Sec. 19-26. Not transferable. A permit issued under this article shall be nontransferable; provided, however, that this shall not prevent any permittee from using such number of solicitors as are required to conduct the solicitation. Sec. 19-27. Revocation. (a) If, upon receipt of written information or upon his own investigation, the Clerk to the Board of G:\ATTORNEY\PMM\AGENDA\solicitamend.ord.wpd 4 Supervisors shall find: G .~ (1) That the holder of a permit issued under this article, or any agent or representative of such holder, is making or has made misrepresentations or untrue statements in conducting the authorized solicitation; or (2) That such solicitation has been or is being conducted in a manner inconsistent or not in conformity with the intent and purpose of this chapter or in a manner which endangers the health, life or property of the citizens of the county; or (3) That any person connected with such solicitation is making or has made any representation that such permit is an endorsement of the solicitation; (a) the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors shall revoke such permit and it shall thereafter be unlawful for any person to make any solicitation pursuant thereto. (b) Before any permit is revoked under this section, the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors shall give the permittee a minimum of twenty-four (24) hours' notice, in writing, that a hearing is to be had before the county administrator and that, at such hearing, the county administrator shall ascertain the facts, and if any reason above set forth for revoking the permit is found to exist, the permit shall be revoked by the p °_'_~-= --1_~L__ Clerk to the Board of the Supervisors. (c) If the county administrator agrees with revocation of the permit the permittee shall be allowed to appeal to the Board of Supervisors whereas the Board will review the facts and determine whether is justification for the permit to be revoked. 2. That this ordinance is effective from and after the date of its adoption. G:\ATTORNEY\PMM\ AGENDA\ solicitamend.ord.wpdrJ ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER ~ ' - / AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 13, 2001 SUBJECT: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1. LEAGUE OF OLDER AMERICANS ADVISORY COUNCIL The one year term of Steven L. Harrah will expire on March 31, 2001. 2. ROANOKE VALLEY-ALLEGHANY REGIONAL COMMISSION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION Former Supervisor Fenton Harrison has contacted Chairman Minnix to resign from the Metropolitan Planning Organization. He is now coaching a girls softball team and his coaching schedule conflicts with the meetings. His term expires July 1, 2002. At the February 13, 2001 Board Meeting, Supervisor Church indicated his willingness to serve on this organization. His confirmation is on the Consent Agenda. 3. ROANOKE VALLEY GREENWAY COMMISSION The three-year terms of Richard Kelly and Charles Witt will expire April 8, 2001. 4. SOCIAL SERVICES ADVISORY BOARD The unexpired four-year term of Raymond Denny, representing the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. Dr. Betty McCrary, Director of Social Services has received notification from Mr. Denny that he has resigned effective January 17, 2001. The term will expire August 1, 2004. SUBMITTED BY: • ~~~ Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator 1 Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: • • ~ ~ VOTE No. Yes Abs Church _ _ Johnson _ _ McNamara- Minnix _ _ _ Nickens 2 -13 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 13, 2001 RESOLUTION 031301-2 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM I -CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for March 13, 2001 designated as Item J -Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 13, inclusive, as follows: Approval of Minutes -December 19, 2000, January 23, 2001, January 27, 2001. 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the Roanoke Valley-Alleghany Regional Commission Metropolitan Planning Organization. 3. Acceptance of Water and Sewer Facilities Serving Winn Dixie Food Store. 4. Request from schools for approval of the Roanoke Valley Regional Board budget amendment for 2000-2001 in the amount of $7,121. 5. Request from schools for acceptance of $700 Grant from the Virginia Commission for the Arts. 6. Acceptance of $5,000 grant from Virginia Tourism Corporation for promotion of Valleyfest. 7. Acceptance of $1,000 donation from Fab 5K Race for Green Hill Park improvements. 8. Appropriation of $24,250 for Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) Family Violence Intervention Program. 9. Resolution initiating the abandonment of Arthur Thurman Road from the Virginia Secondary System of State Highways. 10. Resolution of Appreciation upon the retirement of Victoria S. Dillard, Department of Social Services. 11. Resolution adopting guidelines for the 2001 redistricting of Roanoke County. 12. Acceptance of Old Black Horse Road and a portion of Carolina Trail into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 13. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving Belle Grove, Section 2. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the Consent Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Church, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor McNamara A COPY TESTE: ~• Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Dr. Patricia Radcliffe, Director of Special Education Danial Morris, Director, Finance Dr. Linda Weber, School Superintendent Brenda Chastain, Clerk, School Board James G. Denton, Coordinator of Fine Arts Debbie Pitts, Assistant Director of Recreation Betty McCrary, Director, Social Services Brent Robertson, Director, Finance John Chambliss, Assistant Administrator Terrance L. Harrington, Department of Community Development Paul M, Mahoney, County Attorney Diane St. John, County Registrar Terry Harrington, County Planner 2 ~I January 23, 2001 ,~ ~____~ Roanoke County Administration Center 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 January 23, 2001 The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the fourth Tuesday and the third regularly scheduled meeting of the month of January, 2001. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Minnix called the meeting to order at 3;04 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix, Vice- Chairman Joseph B. "Butch" Church, Supervisors Bob L. Johnson, Joseph McNamara, Harry C. Nickens (arrived at 3:07 p.m.) MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney; Mary H. Allen, Clerk to the Board; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator; Dan R. O'Donnell, Assistant County Administrator; Kathie B. Scearce, Community Relations Director IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES The invocation was given by Gardner Smith, Director of the Purchasing Department. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited by all present. IN RE: REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS January 23, 2001 43 cooperation with the Roanoke County Department of Parks, Recreation, and Tourism and many other corporate sponsors, has sponsored the Mud Run in Green Hill Park to raise funds for the Toys For Tots program and Camp Roanoke.. This year there were 1,371 participants, with over 4,000 spectators, and included runners from ages three to the 70's. This year, the $5,000 contribution brings the total amount to $19,000. These funds will be used to complete the final phases of construction at Camp Roanoke. Captain Andrew Winthrop attended the meeting and presented the check to be used for the Camp Roanoke fund. IN RE: NEW BUSINESS 1. Request for $40,000 funding for County share of a needs assessment for stormwater Phase II National Pollutant Discharge Elimination. (George Simpson Assistant Director of Community Development) A-012301-1 Mr. Simpson reported that effective March 10, 2003 localities having a population of fewer than 100,000 will be required to comply with the Phase II provisions of the Clean Water Act and obtain a NPDES (National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System) permit for stormwater quality. The localities in the Roanoke Valley, including Roanoke County, Roanoke City, the City of Salem, and the Town of Vinton will be required to obtain an NPDES permit and initiate compliance. Staff conducted a work session with the Board of Supervisors on January 9, 2001 for the purpose of briefing the Board on upcoming regulations. Mr. Simpson explained that the Environmental Protection Agency is currently regulating stormwater quality in localities having a population of 100,000 or - January 23, 2001 45 AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None IN RE: REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the first readings and set the second readings and public hearings for February 27, 2001. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None 1. 2. 3. 4. IN RE: FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. First reading of ordinance accepting an offer for and authorizing the sale of 37.86 acres of real estate located in the and Jones Associates. January 23, 2001 d~_ discussion of Item 4. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None Concerning Item 4, staff will give a demonstration of defibrillators at the February 13, 2001 tour of the Regional Training Center. RESOLUTION 012301-2 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM J -CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for January 23, 2001, designated as Item J -Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 10, inclusive, as follows: 1. Confirmation of committee appointments to the Library Board and Social Services Advisory Board 2. Cancellation of joint meeting with Roanoke City Council on February 5, 2001. 3. Designation of John Murphy as Subdivision Agent for Roanoke County and designation of alternates. 4. Acceptance and appropriation of Virginia Department of Health Development Block Grant of $8,025 for the reimbursement of 3 automated external defibrillators. 5. Acceptance and appropriation of $7,500 grant for reimbursement of a computer and projector for the Regional Fire/EMS Training center. 6. Request from schools to accept and appropriate $10,093 to the instructional program for use in the dual enrollment program with Virginia Western Community College. 7. Request from schools to accept and appropriate $7,553 grant from the Department of Education to serve refugee children. 8. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving Plantation Grove, Section 2 9. Request for approval of an Internet Privacy Policy _ January 23, 2001 d4~ ~I IN RE: REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS 1. Request to tour the Regional Fire and EMS Training Center on February 13, 2001. The tour was scheduled for February 13, 2001 at 12:30 p.m. IN RE: REPORTS Supervisor Nickens moved to receive and file the following reports after addition and discussion of Item 9, closing of Catawba Hospital. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Future School Capital Reserve 5. Statement of Estimated Revenues and Expenditures for the month ended 12/31/00. 6. Report of claims activity for the Self-Insurance Program 7. Accounts Paid -December 2000 8. Changes to the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System in December 2000. 9. Closing of Catawba Hospital This report was presented by Mr. Mahoney. He reviewed a summary of legislation submitted by the Governor to implement his proposed restructuring of the mental health care system. He also advised that a letter was sent to the local ~ January 23, 2001 G 1 provided the Board of Supervisors at the last meeting, and he thought that the tennis courts were part of the overall Glenvar project. Dr. Weber responded that she was directed by the School Board to present the same list because it had already been carefully reviewed by school staff and the School Board. Supervisor McNamara recommended that the Board appropriate the funds and let the School Board make the decisions minus purchase of the school buses, which was already approved by the Board of Supervisors, and Supervisor Church concurred. In response to a question from Supervisor Johnson, School Board member Bill Irvin advised that the legal fee budget was $50,000. Supervisor Johnson emphasized that he felt that the most important priorities should be teacher salaries and classroom size. IN RE: NEW BUSINESS Chairman Minnix reconvened in open meeting in the Board Meeting Room. 1. Request for appropriation of final year-end balance from school operations for the year ended June 30, 2000. (Dr. Linda Weber, School Superintendent) A-012301-3 Supervisor McNamara moved to approve appropriation of the remaining year-end funds after $650,000 was deducted for school buses, and that schools may reallocate these remaining funds as long as the funds are used for non-recurring expenses. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, McNamara NAYS: Supervisor Nickens January 23, 2001 _~~ - `~ It was the consensus of the Board that staff move forward with the proposal as long as no new funds are appropriated. 2. Review of Mid-year Expenditures and Revenues The work session was held from 5:25 p.m. until 5:50 p.m. and was presented by Brent Robertson. Mr. Robertson presented the mid-year expenditure review of operations for the departmental budgets and overview of revenue projections for FY 2000-2001. He also provided each Board member with a notebook containing budget information and a calendar. He advised that the final retail sales tax figures should be available by the middle of February. The major departmental concern was the increase in gas and oil costs. The estimated increase in revenues is $2,749,281. Supervisor Minnix noted that the estimated real estate assessment increase is 3.8%. Mr. Hodge advised that few people had questioned their increase, but Supervisor Nickens noted that in some areas in his district, the increase was at 6%. There was discussion on how the personal property tax would be figured and whether the state reimbursement to the localities would be at 50% or 70%. Ms. Hyatt explained that the personal property tax bills will not go out until the first of April and the State should have determined the reimbursement by then. Penny Hodge, Director of Finance and Budget for the Schools, advised that the VRS net reduction will be $1.5 million which can be allocated towards salaries. Supervisor Johnson noted that 1 % for teachers salaries is $757,000 and 1 % for County salaries is $350,000. Mr. Robertson highlighted the proposed revenues from the General Assembly, including funding from the Compensation Board, the Department of Criminal January 23, 2001 ~~ RESOLUTION 012301-4 CERTIFYING THE CLOSED MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened a closed meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recarded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such closed meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the closed meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the closed meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the Certification Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None IN RE: PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Resolutions of Congratulations to Kevin Capelety, Northside High School, for being named to the All State Group AA Football Team. R-012301-5 Kevin Capelety was present to receive the resolution. Supervisor Minnix moved to adopt the resolution. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None RESOLUTION 012301-5 OF CONGRATULATIONS TO KEVIN LEE CAPELETY FOR AN OUTSTANDING FOOTBALL SEASON AND BEING NAMED TO ALL-STATE FIRST TEAMS, GROUP AA WHEREAS, team sports are an important part of the curriculum at schools January 23, 2001 .S'~1 within the boundaries of Monet Drive located in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. (Terry Harrington, County Planner] 0-012301-6 Mr. Harrington advised there were no changes to the ordinance since the first reading. There was no discussion and no citizens to speak. Supervisor Minnix moved to adopt the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None ORDINANCE 012301-6 TO VACATE A SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT AND INGRESS & EGRESS EASEMENT ON PLAT OF "SECTION N0. 1, THE GROVES," IN PLAT BOOK 17, PAGE 89, A PORTION OF A 20' ACCESS EASEMENT ON RESUBDIVISION PLAT OF "PUMP STATION LOT (0.400 AC.) & 20' ACCESS EASEMENT," IN PLAT BOOK 17, PAGE 101, AND A 20' WATER LINE EASEMENT ON PLAT OF "SECTION NO. 3, THE GROVES," IN PLAT BOOK 18, PAGE 153, AND SAID EASEMENTS BEING FURTHER SHOWN AS EXISTING EASEMENTS ON PLAT OF "SECTION NO. 5, THE GROVES," IN PLAT BOOK 21, PAGE 40, WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF MONET DRIVE, AND LOCATED IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, by plat entitled `SECTION NO. 1, "THE GROVES"', dated November 10, 1994, and of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Plat Book 17, page 89, a "S.S.E." [sanitary sewer easement] and an "INGRESS AND EGRESS EASEMENT TO SEWER PUMP STATION" [access easement] were created and shown within the future right-of-way for the extension of Monet Drive; and, WHEREAS, by `PLAT SHOWING THE RESUBDIVISION OF TRACT "A" (52.011 AC.) PROPERTY OF NICHOLAS H. BEASLEY, TAX #96.02-1-46.4, CREATING HEREON PUMP STATION LOT (0.400 AC.) & 20' ACCESS EASEMENT" dated December 15, 1994, and of record in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 17, page 101, a "NEW 20' ACCESS EASEMENT" was shown and dedicated for access to the pump station lot, a portion of which lies within the extension of Monet Drive; and, WHEREAS, by plat entitled `SECTION NO. 3, "THE GROVES"', dated January 1996, and of record in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 18, page 153, a "20' W.E." [water line easement] was created and shown within the future extension of Monet Drive; and, WHEREAS, by plat entitled `SECTION NO. 5, "THE GROVES"', dated June 23, 1998, and of record in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 21, page 40, the extension of Monet Drive was dedicated to the public and each of the above- _ January 23, 2001 _~~ Book 21, page 40, located in the Cave Spring Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to § 15.2-2272 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), subject to the condition that the existing water facilities may continue to occupy the right-of-way for Monet Drive in the existing condition and location, and that a permit for the water lines and facilities is issued by VDOT. 4. That all costs and expenses associated herewith, including but not limited to publication, survey and recordation costs, shall be the responsibility of the Petitioner, Palm Land Company, L.C. 5. That the County Administrator or any Assistant County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish the provisions of this ordinance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 6. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption, and a certified copy of this ordinance shall be recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in accordance with § 15.2-2272.2 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended). On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None 2. Second reading of ordinance for a Special Use Permit for construction of mini-warehouses, located at 4530 Barley Drive, Catawba Magisterial District upon the petition of Jerry Letterman. (Terry Harrington, County Planner 0-012301-7 Mr. Harrington advised that the main concern at the Planning Commission was the VDOT proposal to improve Route 11/460 and the impact the widening would have on the property. Current plans indicate that this entire property may be needed for road improvements. Mr. Letterman verified that the proposed warehousing units are mobile and that if VDOT takes the property they could be moved to another property, or sold. The Planning Commission recommended approval with three conditions. Supervisor Church moved to adopt the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara January 23, 2001 ~~ __ ~R-i i 21 grants as follows: (a) for the Blue Ride Parkway Interpretative Center at Explore Park. Phase II (b) joint grant application with the City of Salem for the construction of the Roanoke River Greenway from Green Hill Park to the corporate limits of the City of Salem. R-012301-8 Ms. Hyatt explained that staff has developed TEA-21 applications for two different projects, both of which were awarded funding last year. Because last year's funding was less than requested and insufficient to complete the projects, applications are being resubmitted to try to get additional funds. The applications are as follows: (1) A grant for the Blue Ridge Parkway Interpretive Center at Virginia's Explore Park, Phase III, for exhibit fabrication and installation, related upfit and landscaping. This project was awarded $211,000 last year, matched by $52,750 of funds from Roanoke County spent on the design of the exhibits. This application requests an additional $460,000 in TEA-21 funds, matched by $115,000 in National Park Service and Roanoke County in-kind services and private donations. (2) A grant application submitted jointly with the City of Salem for the design and construction of the Roanoke River Greenway, consisting of 7.2 miles in western Roanoke County and the City of Salem. This project was awarded $300,000 last year, $175,000 of which will be used for construction of the greenway in Green Hill Park, matched by $47,100 approved by the Board on January 9, 2001. This year's application requests $1.6 million in additional TEA-21 funds, to be matched by $450,000 in right-of-way donations, in-kind services and capital funds. Roanoke County's share of the capital funds would be $32,000 to be used as match to January 23, 2001 _ ~ application resolution. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None RESOLUTION .012301-9 SUPPORTING THE TEA-21 GRANT APPLICATION FOR ROANOKE RIVER GREENWAY WHEREAS, the Transportation Enhancement Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) was signed into federal law in June 1998, and WHEREAS, the Act authorizes $18.5 million a year through 2003 in Virginia for transportation enhancement, and WHEREAS, a supplementary transportation enhancement grant application has been submitted by Roanoke County and the City of Salem for the Roanoke River Greenway project, a 7.2 mile section in western Roanoke County and the City of Salem, and WHEREAS, the grant application requests $1.6 million in TEA-21 funds, matched by right-of-way donations, in-kind services and capital funds, and WHEREAS, Roanoke County's share of the capital funds would be $32,000 over three years, and WHEREAS, the Roanoke River Greenway is considered the backbone of the Roanoke Valley greenway system, and WHEREAS, each grant applications must be accompanied by a resolution of support from the local government by January 31, 2001; THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, supports the TEA-21 grant application for the Roanoke River Greenway project. On motion of Supervisor Church to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None IN RE: REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS Supervisor Johnson noted that the Board passed a resolution supporting the TEA-21 grant for the Roanoke River Greenway Trail through Green Hill Park. Supervisor McNamara: (1) He announced that there will be an Economic Development Forum on Saturday, January 27 and thanked everyone involved in the planning process. He named some of the participants in the forum and explained that this was a continuation of a process that began last year. (2) He advised that he received correspondence that the Vinton Fire and Rescue had problems. with covering January 23, 2001 ~c suggested that the Board consider returning part of these funds to the citizens by reducing the tax rate. Supervisor Minnix: He announced that the Board will go back into Work Session on the 4'h floor to discuss the potential water park. IN RE: WORK SESSION ON PROPOSED WATER PARK The work session was held from 7:35 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. and was presented by Pete Haislip, Director of Parks, Recreation and Tourism and Diane Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Haislip reported that the survey identified several popular areas for the proposed water park, and a citizen survey identified 59% support for the idea of a water park. In response to questions, Mr. Haislip advised that various models will be considered including a private park, a public park, or a combination private-public park; and that the park will be open for approximately 100 days each year. Mr. Haislip explained that the next step is to conduct a feasibility study which will take about one month. There was general consensus to move forward with the Phase II Feasibility Study. IN RE: DISCUSSION ON VIRGINIA GAS PIPELINE CO-LOCATION Mr. Mahoney asked for direction on whether to spend $10,000 to hire an engineer to do a costs analysis of the gas pipeline within the existing easement to submit to the State Corporation Commission. Since the Board had already announced adjournment, he advised that he would ask for direction at the Saturday, January 27 Economic Development Forum. January 27, 2001 ~,~ Roanoke County Administration Center 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 January 27, 2001 The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Moody Center, Hollins University, this being the fourth Saturday of the month of January 2001 and a special meeting for the purpose of an Economic Development Forum. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Minnix called the meeting to order at 8:45 a. m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix (left at 1:00 p.m.), Vice- Chairman Joseph B. "Butch" Church, Supervisors Bob L. Johnson, Joseph McNamara, Harry C. Nickens (left at 4:00 p.m.) MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney; Mary H. Allen, Clerk to the Board; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator; Dan R. O'Donnell, Assistant CountyAdministrator; Kathie B. Scearce, Community Relations Director; Arnold Covey, Community Development Director; Jill Barr, Assistant Economic Development Director; Melinda Cox, Economic Development Specialist; Joe Zielinski, Economic Development Specialist; Diane Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer; Brent Robertson, Budget Director OTHERS PRESENT: Dennis Cronk, Commercial Realtor; Will Davis, Economic - January 27, 2001 _ ~n _ ,, At 12:25 p.m., Chairman Minnix declared a luncheon recess. IN RE: CLOSED MEETING At 12:26 p.m., Supervisor Minnix moved to go into Closed Meeting pursuant to the Code of Virginia 2.1-344A (3) to discuss an economic development prospect for which there has been no previous announcement; and 2.1-344A (7) legal briefings by counsel concerning the SCC proceedings and Virginia Gas Pipeline. The motion was carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None IN RE: OPEN MEETING At 12:50 p.m. the Board returned to Open Meeting. IN RE: ACTION CONCERNING VIRGINIA GAS PIPELINE Supervisor Nickens moved to authorize the CountyAdministratorand County Attorney to retain a consultant engineer to prepare a cost comparison study to construct the gas pipeline in a new easement versus an existing easement (co-location) at a cost not to exceed $10,000. The motion was carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None on the future of the County. The participants brainstormed two actions that each player might take to ensure the success of each driver. They then predicted whether the player would be successful at implementing the actions. Bonz Hart, representing the New Century Technology Council offered several suggestion for recruiting high-tech companies which included taking the prospect to another technology company, to a technology university and students, to a technology attorney, to a technology networking group, and showing the prospect the night life in the Roanoke Valley. There was general discussion among the participants on what Roanoke County should make available to economic development prospects, especially high technology prospects, including venture capital, angel capital, flexible space with short term lease agreements, an outstanding web site, and a trained employee pool. Vice Chairman Church thanked everyone for attending and participating in the forum and presented gifts to the individuals from outside agencies and businesses. RE: ADJOURNMENT At 5:00 p.m., Vice Chairman Church adjourned the forum. Submitted by: Approved by: Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board Joseph B. "Butch" Church Vice Chairman ~~" f December 19, 2000 7 ~ ~ Roanoke County Administration Center 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 December 19, 2000 The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the third Tuesday and the second regularly scheduled meeting of the month of December, 2000. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman McNamara called the meeting to order at 3:05 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Joseph McNamara, Vice Chairman H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix, Supervisors Joseph B. "Butch" Church, Bob L. Johnson, Harry C. Nickens MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney; Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk to the Board; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator; Dan R. O'Donnell, Assistant County Administrator IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES The invocation was given by The Reverend Dusty Fiedler, Covenant Presbyterian Church. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited by all present. IN RE: REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS ~Mr. Hodge added an item to the Closed Meeting pursuant to Section 2.1- 344 A (7) briefing by counsel and staff with respect to Salem Vent Performance December 19, 2000 71-7 Management Team, and one of the three represen#atives on the Board of Directors of the BRCS, presented their annual report. She introduced Jim Sikkema, BRCS Executive Director, and reported that the BRCS staff delivered over 109,000 units of service to more than 2,600 County residents; that the County's local matching contribution to the agency for FY 2000 was $79,332; and that County residents received $31.26 worth of services for each tax dollar allocated to the BRCS. Mr. Sikkema responded to several questions from the Board. IN RE: NEW BUSINESS 1. Consideration of the petition of DePaul Family Services Inc to adopt a resolution supporting its request to the Virginia General Assembly to exempt from taxation certain property owned by DePaul in the County of Roanoke {Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) (CONTINUED FROM NOVEMBER 74, 2000 R-121900-1 Mr. Mahoney advised that this matter was brought up at the November 14, 2000 meeting at which time a public hearing was held. The Board held the public hearing and deferred action to request additional information and so that the Board members could meet with the officials at DePaul and possibly tour the facility. A site plan has been provided to show the location of the property and information about salaries and staffing levels is contained in a letter from Mr. Herb Beskar, Executive Director. There were also questions about other commercial operations that may have been conducted at the facility in the past and that research has been provided. Mr. Beskar who was present responded to inquiries from the Board members. After discussion, Supervisor Minnix requested that a policy be established December 19, 2000 7~ AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None 2. Request for approval of the application of North Cross School to the Industrial Development Authority of the City of Salem VA for issuance of revenue bonds not to exceed $8 000 000 Elmer Hodge County Administrator R-121900-2 Mr. Hodge advised that North Cross School is an independent, non- sectarian coeducational day school for students in Junior Kindergarten through Grade 12. The school was founded and originally located in the City of Salem, and has been located on Colonial Avenue in Roanoke County for many years. The school is a partner with the County Parks & Recreation Department for use of their facilities. The school is applying for Industrial Development Authority Bonds through the City of Salem so that they can get "bank qualified" bonds. "Bank qualified" debt is a special category of debt that is only available to small issuers (those that issue under $10 million in a calendar year}. The Salem City Council heard the request on December 11, 2000 and voted to approve the financing. There is no fiscal impact to the County because the bonds specifically provide that no political subdivision is obligated to pay the principal or interest on the bonds or any other costs. Supervisor Nickens moved to adopt the resolution. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None RESOLUTION 121900-2 APPROVING THE APPLICATION OF NORTH CROSS SCHOOL TO THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SALEM, VIRGINIA FOR ISSUANCE OF REVENUE December 19, 2000 721 defer action until the next meeting because there are still two issues that need to be negotiated and included in the agreement. One issue is to add Hanging Rock Estates LLC to the agreement and secondly, to secure a release of all claims that Hanging Rock and Carlson Associates have against the County. Supervisor Johnson advised that he had several questions which he would like answered before considering approval. These included: (1) What is Exaquaria Corporation and who are the principals? (2) Asked that staff tally exactly how much money has been spent by everyone, including engineering costs, legal fees, meetings with banks, bankruptcy hearings, Chapter 11 proceedings, for this subdivision. (3) Can the County withhold the reimbursement or bring up other items or issues? (4) When this is brought back for a vote, possibly in February, 2001, could information be provided about how many lots have been sold and how many building permits have been issued? and (5) How has the oversized sewer helped the County? Supervisor Church moved to defer the item until the first meeting in January subject to the organizational meeting and adoption of meeting dates. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None IN RE: REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA: Supervisor Minnix moved to approve the first reading and set the second reading and public hearing for January 23, 2001, subject to the organizational meeting and adoption of meeting date. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix December 19, 2000 72 second reading for January 9, 2001, subject to the organizational meeting and adoption of meeting dates. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None IN RE: SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Second reading of ordinance authorizing creation of and financing for a Local Public Works Improvement Project• Webster Road Water Project located in the Hollins Magisterial District. (Gary Robertson Utility Director 0-121900-3 Mr. Robertson advised that there were some questions at the first reading of this ordinance and he would like to clarify those issues. This project covers only the six original petitioners because when staff looked at the bigger area of 95 properties, they received little response. Another issue was whether a project should be considered for water quality issues as opposed to water quantity, and he explained the reasons why water quality in this area can be a health concern, and the project should move forward. He advised that properties at 8116 and 8110 Webster Drive are served by a single well located at 6723 Labun Road and since that property owner is now on County water, they have been told they must either get County water or drill wells. Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None ORDINANCE 121900-3 AUTHORIZING THE CREATION OF AND December 19, 2000 725 (b) Property owners agree to execute a promissory note or such other instrument as the County may require to secure this installment debt. (c) Property owners further agree to execute such lien document or instrument as may be required by the County; said lien document or instrument to be recorded in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County. This lien instrument or document shall secure the repayment of the promissory note by the property owners to the County and shall be a lien against the property of the owners. Property owners also agree to pay the County any Clerk's fees or recordation costs which may be required to record any lien instrument or documents in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court. 4. Property owners who wish to participate after the deadline set out in paragraph 3 (other than new property owners) shall pay a minimum of $5,346 ($4,455 construction costs plus 20% plus $30 x length of road frontage in excess of 250 feet) plus the off-site facility fee in effect at that time. 5. That the payment by citizens in the project service area who elect to participate shall be made to the Public Works Participation Fund. Any off-site facility fee collected on this project shall be returned to the Water Fund. 6. That the County Administrator is authorized to take such actions and execute such documents as may be necessary to accomplish the purposes of this transaction, all upon form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None 2. Second reading of ordinance ratifying and approving a contract of sale with Billy B. Guthrie and Barbara B Guthrie for the purchase of 2.797 acres of land being the westerly portion of property (Tax Map No 97 05-1-3) and authorizing the acquisition and acceptance for parks and recreation purposes and located in the Cave Spring Magisterial District (Pete Haislip, Director, Parks Recreation & Tourism) 0-121900-4 Mr. Haislip advised that this is the second reading of an ordinance to authorize the purchase of land from the Guthrie family. This property is located adjacent to the new South County Park, and would allow for re-location of the south December 19, 2000 727 2. That acquisition and acceptance of the parcel, referenced above, from Billy Buck Guthrie and Barbara B. Guthrie, is hereby authorized and approved, said parce! being more particularly described as follows: All that certain tract or parcel of land, together with any improvements thereon, rights incident thereto, and appurtenances thereunto belonging, situate in the Cave Spring Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, consisting of 2.797 acres, more or less, as shown highlighted and designated as "PORTION OF TAX #97.05-1-3 - 2.797 AC." on 'Plat Showing The Subdivision Of (4.060 Acres) And Combination Of (50.475 Acres) Being The Property of The Board Of Supervisors Of Roanoke County ...' dated August 18, 2000, prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C., a partial copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 3. That the sum of Forty-Eight Thousand Dollars ($48,000.00) for the acquisition of this real estate and the sum of Three Thousand Dollars ($3,000.00) for related expenses, including tree buffer costs, the environmental audit, recordation fees, legal fees, title insurance and all other closing costs, is available in the Parks and Recreation Department budget. 4. That the County Administrator, or an Assistant County Administrator, is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County in this matter as may be necessary to accomplish this acquisition and accept the property, all of which shall be approved as to form by the County Attorney. 5. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None IN RE: APPOINTMENTS 1. Social Services Advisory Board Supervisor Johnson requested that an expression of appreciation be sent to Bob Lewis for his service on this Board. IN RE: CONSENT AGENDA R-121900-5: R-121900-5.a• R-121900-5.e Supervisor Minnix requested that a letter of appreciation be sent to the Salem Rotary Club for their donation. December 19, 2000 ~2~~ 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor McNamara to adopt the Consent Resolution,. and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None RESOLUTION 121900-5.a EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY UPON THE RETIREMENT OF AUDREY J. BOWER, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, AFTER MORE THAN FIFTEEN YEARS OF SERVICE WHEREAS, Audrey J. Bower was first employed by Roanoke County on September 3, 1985 as a secretary in the Engineering and Planning Department; and also served as Planning Projects Coordinator; and WHEREAS, Ms. Bower retired from Roanoke County on October 1, 2000 as a Program Support Specialist with the Community Development Department after more than fifteen years of service; and WHEREAS, Ms. Bower served as the Recording Secretary for the Roanoke County Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, Ms. Bower, as Recording Secretary for the Planning Commission, played the crucial role of ensuring that the Planning Commission agendas, legal ads, and bi-monthly packets of information were correctly prepared and timely distributed; and WHEREAS, Ms. Bower, through her employment with Roanoke County, has been instrumental in improving the quality of life for its citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to AUDREY J. BOWER for more than fifteen years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke County. FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy, restful, and productive retirement. On motion of Supervisor McNamara to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None RESOLUTION 121900-5.e REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF PEACE LANE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM WHEREAS, the street described on the attached Addition Form SR-5(A), fully incorporated herein by reference are shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, and WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised this Board the streets meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation, December 19, 2000 731 ~~ A work session was scheduled for the first meeting in January, 2001, subject to the organizational meeting and adoption of meeting dates. 3. Request for Work Session at first meeting in January, 2001 on Redistricting. Paul Mahoney, Counto Attorne A work session was scheduled for the first meeting in January, 2001, subject to the organizational meeting and adoption of meeting dates. IN RE: REPORTS Supervisor Johnson moved to receive and file the following reports. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Ca ital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Future School Capital Reserve 5. Changes to Secondary S stem of State Highways as of December. 2000 6. Account Paid -November 2000 7. Review of October 24, 2000 Board Action to appropriate funding and positions for twenty additional fire fighters. IN RE: CLOSED MEETING December 19, 2000 ~~ 2. Work Session on Clearbrook rezoning. Ter Harrington, County Planner The work session was held from 4:35 p.m. until 4:55 p.m. and presented by Mr. Harrington. There was a discussion of the zoning and community plan changes proposed for Clearbrook including VDOT access and the need for water and sewer which is being requested at the evening session. 3. Work Session on funding for Roanoke River Greenwav. Pete Haislia, Parks, Recreation & Tourism Director, and Liz Belcher, Greenwav Coordinator) The work session was held from 4:55 p.m. until 5:20 p.m. and a power point presentation was made by Mr. Haislip and Ms. Belcher outlining the proposed plan of action for the planning and construction of the Roanoke River Greenway in the County. A joint County and Salem TEA-21 grant of $300,000 has been awarded and $175,000 of this grant has been dedicated for the Green Hill Section. Salem will use the remaining $125,000 to design and engineer the remainder of the Roanoke River trail project in Salem. The grant required a 20% match from the localities and $47,000 is needed from the County to move forward with the Green Hill section. For the East County portion of the trail, from the Wastewater Treatment Plant to Explore Park, staff has estimated the total cost of the project at $1,569,700. This includes a potential $400,000 bridge connection to Vinton, funds for right of way acquisition, planning and design, and construction. To verify these estimates and get other necessary information, they are requesting $30,000 from the County for the conceptual master plan for the eastern section. December 19, 2000 7~ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the closed meeting which .this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the closed meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor McNamara to adopt the Certification Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None IN RE: APPROPRIATION OF COUNTY SHARE FOR MCDONALD FARMS 1. Request approval of appropriation of 500 000 Roanoke County's share of construction costs for the 99.53 acres park rooect in East County known as McDonald Farm. Elmer Hodge, Co_ unty Administrator) A-121900-7 Chairman McNamara advised that the Board was adding this item for action as a result of discussion at the work session and closed meeting held earlier. Mr. Hodge advised that the Town of Vinton purchased the McDonald Farm fifteen years ago and has worked with the County as partners while planning the business park. This project was included in the Gainsharing Agreement which was adopted by the Board. The Town has $1.5 million in equity in the project and has requested that the County match the $450,000 that they have recently appropriated to begin development of the site. He asked that the Board appropriate $500,000 from the year end surplus fund as the County's share of the projected construction costs for Phase l development at McDonald Farm. This appropriation is contingent upon being able to add an addendum December 19, 2000 ~~_ County's share of money will be reduced/increased proportionately. The Revenue Sharing Program for FY 2001-2002 contains 61 projects totaling $1 million in construction improvements. The County and VDOT staff presented a proposed priority project list with maps and justifications for inclusion in the Revenue Sharing Program for FY 2001-2002 at the November 14, 2000 Board work session. Since there have been no requests to modify or change the priority fist, staff is requesting the Board to approve the priority list for FY 2001-2002 Revenue Sharing Program; authorize the Chairman or County Administrator to sign the letter of intent; and defer appropriation of the funds ($500,000) until July 1, 2001. There were no citizens present to speak on this item. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the projects. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None Adoption of resolution for Secondary Road System Six- Year Construction Plan for Fiscal Years 2001 through 2007 and the allocation of funds for Fiscal Years 2001- 2002. R-121900-9 Mr. Covey advised that staff is requesting that the Board adopt a resolution approving the Secondary Road System Six-Year Construction Plan for Fiscal Years 2001-2007 and approve the allocation of funds for Fiscal Year 2001-2002. In accordance with the Code of Virginia, the Board is required to conduct a public hearing on the Secondary Road System Six-Year Construction Plan. This six year plan was presented at a work session on November 14, 2000, along with funding figures for the next -five years and the distribution of this year's allocation {$3.56 million) among the December 19, 2000 7~~ Supervisor Johnson requested that Chairman McNamara announce the results of the vote afterwards for those people using Closed Captioning while viewing the meeting. IN RE: PUBLIC HEARING AND FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE 1. First reading of ordinance to vacate a ortion of a 15-foot drainage easement on I~at entitled "Subdivision of the Orchards. Section 2 Applewood", Plat Book 9 a e 112, and further shown as "Existing 15': Drainage Easement ,~B. 9 PG. 112)" in Plat Book 13, Page 59, located in the Hollins Magisterial District. Arnold CoCovey" Community Development Director Mr. Covey advised that this is the same property discussed earlier today when the first reading of an ordinance was approved to vacate a 100 foot drainage easement for petitioners, DFC Roanoke, LLC, and F&W Community Development Corporation. The petitioners are owners of this property and are asking to vacate a 15 foot drainage easement to move forward with construction of a proposed multi-family apartments. He advised that this is an advertised public hearing. The easement is not needed since all the drainage on the site has been designed and handled. There were no citizens present to speak on this item. Supervisor Johnson moved to approve the first reading and set the second reading for January 9, 2001 (subject to dates approved at the organizational meeting). The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None December 19, 2000 7d ~ design guidelines for the Clearbrook Village Overlay District. These are the policies for Clearbrook and not a zoning amendment. They are very defined with regard to the character of future development and will be used as a guide to evaluate future actions such as special use permits, rezoning and as a guide for private property owners to preparing developments. He advised that the second document is to amend the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance to add a new overlay district called Clearbrook Overlay District. These standards would be applied on top of an underlying district. It is the ordinance that will define elements and set legal standards for things such as landscaping, signnage, lightning in the Clearbrook community. The third ordinance is for the rezoning of the land and the application of these standards. In the Clearbrook community, there is (and currently zoned either AV, agricultural village, which allows very limited commercial district and five small parcels that are zoned AR, agricultural residential with no commercial rights. The third ordinance rezones all of this property to C-2, general commercial zoning district,~and simultaneously applies the Clearbrook Village Overlay District standards to create the C-2 Clearbrook Village Overlay District to guide the future development of the community. Mr. Michael Wray, 5650 Yellow Mountain Road, President of Clearbrook Civic League, announced the members of the Clearbrook Committee and recognized those who were present. On behalf of the Committee, he requested that the Board adopt the Clearbrook overlay as a supplement to the County Zoning Ordinance. The proposed overlay standards will allow the Clearbrook community to maintain a degree of control of the future nature and appearance of their community. December 19, 2000 7d~_ WHEREAS, Roanoke County has worked with the citizens of the Clearbrook community to clarify and refine the growth policies and objectives for their community for the purpose of guiding the location and character of future growth; and, WHEREAS, the citizens of Clearbrook, working in conjunction with Roanoke County did develop a set of design guidelines for the Clearbrook area; and WHEREAS, the intent of these guidelines, known as the Design Guidelines for the Clearbrook Village Commercial Overlay District is to establish recommended policies and standards for the character of future development within the Clearbrook area; and, WHEREAS, Clearbrook community meetings were held in July and November of 2000 to solicit community input on the guidelines; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission did hold a public hearing on December 5~h, 2000 to receive community input on the guidelines, and did thereafter recommend to the Board of Supervisors that the guidelines be adopted as an amendment to the 1998 Roanoke County Community Plan; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law, and that the first reading of this ordinance was held on November 14, 2000, and second reading and public hearing was held on December 19, 2000. BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County Virginia, that, 1. The 1998 Community Plan of Roanoke County, Virginia be, and hereby is, amended by the addition of the Design Guidelines for the Clearbrook Village Commercial Overlay District, dated December 5, 2000, and is reenacted .with said guidelines. 2. That this ordinance shall become effective on January 1, 2001. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None Ordinance amending and re-enacting the Zoning Ordinance for Roanoke County ~ the addition of the Clearbrook Villaae Overlay District. 0-121900-11 Supervisor Minnix moved to adopt the ordinance with the correction on page 11 amending and re-enacting the Zoning Ordinance for Roanoke County by the addition of the Clearbrook Village Overlay District. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None December 19, 2000 ~~ Parkway, Clearbrook School, and other social and cultural resources in Clearbrook area. The Clearbrook area has adequate public facilities, good road access, suitable topography, and land available for development or redevelopment. Recognizing these factors, the plan, and this district promote the creation of the Village of Clearbrook. Commercial development consistent with these district standards and the Community Plan Design Guidelines for the Clearbrook Village Commercial Overlay District is encouraged, but strip commercial patterns of development are discouraged. Thus, the district allows a wide variety of commercial uses, but provides a high degree of emphasis on landscaping, building design, site design, and Fighting and signage control. Sec. 30-58-2 Creation of Overlay (A) The Clearbrook Village Overlay District is created as an amendment to the official zoning map of Roanoke County. All regulations and standards contained herein shall apply to all parcels and land within the designated overlay district. (B) The boundaries of the overlay district as shown on the official zoning map may only be amended by action of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors pursuant to Section 30-14 of this ordinance. Sec. 30-58-3 Applicability and Administration (A) The Zoning Administrator shall have the responsibility for determining compliance with these standards. In making any such determination, the Zoning Administrator shall consider the purposes of the Clearbrook Village Overlay District, and shall consider the extent to which the requested use or development substantially complies with the Design Guidelines for the Clearbrook Village Commercial Overlay District adopted as part of the Roanoke County Community Plan. If in the opinion of the Zoning Administrator, the use or development does not substantially comply with these design guidelines, the requested use or development shall, by decision of the Zoning Administrator, be considered a special use and shall require a special use permit pursuant to Section 30-19 of this ordinance. Sec. 30-58-4 Permitted Uses and Use Restrictions The uses permitted in the Clearbrook Village Overlay District shall be governed by the underlying zoning district in which the property is located as shown on the official zoning maps, except as otherwise modified below: (A) The following uses shall be prohibited within the Clearbrook Village Overlay District: Civic Uses December 19, 2000 7~~_ Sec. 30-58-5 Site Development Regulations The site development regulations required in the Clearbrook Village Overlay District shall be governed by the underlying zoning district in which the property is located as shown on the official zoning maps, except as otherwise modified below: (A) Maximum height of structures Height limitations: a. Principal structures: 35 feet b. Accessory structures: actual height of principal structure. (B} Maximum coveraae 1. Building coverage: 50 percent of the total lot area. 2. Lot coverage: 70 percent of the total lot area. Sec. 30-58-6 Special Regulations in the Clearbrook Village Overlay District The following special regulations shall apply within the Clearbrook Village Overlay District (A) Landscaping Required landscaping within the Clearbrook Village Overlay District shall comply with the standards contained in Section 30-92-4.1 of this ordinance. (B) Signage Signage within the Clearbrook Village Overlay District shall comply with C-1 Sign District regulations, except as modified by Section 30-93-14 (F) of this ordinance. (C) Lighting Lighting within the Clearbrook Village Overlay District shall comply with the provisions of Section 30-94 of this ordinance. (D) Utilities All new utility lines and services within the Clearbrook Village Overlay District shall be located underground. (E) ~ Residential Use Types Residential Use Types within the Clearbrook Village Overlay District upon the date of the adoption of this ordinance shall not be deemed to be nonconformities, and may be reconstructed, altered and/or enlarged consistent with the requirements contained in Section 30-58-5 of this ordinance. In addition, single family detached dwellings may be developed in the district on lots of record in existence on the effective date of this ordinance. Any dwelling constructed shall not be deemed to be anon-conformity. No new subdivisions for residential purposes shall be allowed within the Clearbrook Village Overlay District, December 19, 2000 7,-~ 2. All landscaping shall be alive and in good condition at the time of planting. All landscaping shall be maintained, and replaced, as necessary to insure continued compliance with these provisions. 3. Where specified, all deciduous trees shall have a minimum caliper of 2.5 inches at the time of planting. Evergreen trees shall have a minimum height of 8 feet at time of planting 4. Where specified, all shrubs shall have a minimum height of 24 inches at time of planting. 5. Native species shall be use for a minimum of 50% of required plantings. A listing of acceptable native species is available in the Department of Community Development (CJ Site Landscaping 1. Landscaped areas shall be provided for the side and rear walls of all buildings. The width. of these landscaped areas shall be sufficient to accommodate the required plantings. The following plantings shall be required: a. For buildings walls in excess of 15 feet in height, one tree shall be planted for every 20 lineal feet of building wall b. For building walls 15 feet or less in height, one tree shall be planted for every 30 lineal feet of building wall. Flexibility in the location of landscaped areas and the placement of the required trees shall be allowed for the purpose of implementing professionally designed landscape plans and far loading, service, or other similar areas. 2. Landscaping shall be provided along the main entrance fagade of all buildings, providing a vegetative area between the building and parking areas. The size of the required front landscaped area shall not be less than 20 percent of the square footage of the front fagade of the building. The landscaped area shall be professionally designed and planted with a mixture of trees, shrubs and groundcovers. Undeveloped areas between a building and a public or private right- of-way shat( be landscaped with berms, trees, shrubs and groundcover. Landscaping plans for these areas shall incorporate a minimum of one large tree, three small trees and seven shrubs for every 30 feet of lot frontage. 3. All above ground stormwater management areas and facilities shall be landscaped with plant materials that are adaptable to being temporarily inundated with water. The facility shall be landscaped in order to create a _ December 19, 2000 7~ ~ F) Clearbrook Village Overlay District. Signage within the Clearbrook Village Overlay district should be planned, designed and installed to complement a buildings architectural style. All signage wifihin the Clearbrook Village Overlay district shall comply with C-1 Office District regulations with the following exceptions: 1. Lots within the Clearbrook Village Overlay District shall be allowed a maximum signage allocation not to exceed one (1) square foot of sign area per one (1) lineal foot of lot frontage. 2. Signage placed on a building wall shall occupy less than 5% of the fagade area of that wall 3. All freestanding signs shall be of a monument design and shall meet the following criteria: a. Monument signs, including their structure, shall not exceed seven (7) feet in height, or ten (10) feet in width. b. Signs shall be channel iit, ground lit, or top lit with a shielded light source so as to not cast light onto the path of traffic or on any adjacent road or property. 4. No establishment shall be allowed more than three (3) signs) 5. A maximum of two directional signs shall be allowed per lot, and no directional sign shall exceed two square feet in size. 6. The following signs shall be prohibited in the Clearbrook Village Overlay District: a. Off-Premises Signs b. Temporary Signs c. Portable Signs d. Roof Signs 7. Amend Sec 30-94 by the addition of the following: Section 30-94 Exterior Lighting (A) 2. Within. the Clearbrook Village Overlay District, no freestanding light pole, including fixture, shall be more than 18 feet above grade. All exterior lights, including security lighting, within the district shall be down-lit or shielded so as not to direct glare onto adjoining streets or residential properties. The intensity at adjoining streets or residential properties shall not exceed 0.5 foot candles. B. 1. That this ordinance shall become effective on January 1, 2001. December 19, 2000 7~~ WITH RESPECT TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF PROPERTY LOCATED THEREIN WHEREAS, Ordinance 112288-7 authorizes the financing of local public works improvements and the imposition of special assessments upon abutting property owners upon the adoption of an appropriate ordinance by the Board of Supervisars; and WHEREAS, Sections 15.2-2243, 15.2-2400 and 15.2-2404, et seq. authorize the County to create and establish a general water and sewer improvement program for a designated area of the County having related and common sewer and water conditions, to install certain public works improvements, and to impose fees, charges and assessments for said improvements; and WHEREAS, the extension of the public water and sewer systems and the creation of a special utility service district will alleviate public health and safety problems and promote economic development; and WHEREAS, the Board hereby establishes the "Stable Road Water and Sewer District"; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this Ordinance was held on November 14, 2000, and the second reading and public hearing was held December 19, 2000; and BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the authority of Ordinance 112288-7, the Board authorizes and approves a local public works improvement project, namely, public sewer and water extensions for the Stable Road community. That pursuant to the authority of Section 15.2-2243, the Board establishes a general water and sewer improvement program for the Stable Road community. The total construction cost of this public sewer project is estimated to be $418,766, to be assessed against the properties within the project service district as shown on the attached Exhibit A. That there is hereby appropriated for this project the sum of $418,766 from the General Fund Unappropriated Balance. 2. That the "Stable Road Water and Sewer District" is shown and designated on the attached plat entitled "Clearbrook Area Water and Sewer Service Districts" prepared by the Roanoke County Utility Department, dated November 2000 (Exhibit B). The Utility Department shall construct in and adjacent to the Project Service District sewer and water lines and appurtenant facilities as shown in the map of this area, and shall acquire easements for these lines and facilities. 3. That the owner, subdivider or developer of property located within the Project Service District shall, before or at the time of issuance of a building permit for the construction of any building or structure to be located on his ~or her property which is to be the subject of development or subdivision, pay or provide for the payment of a share of the cost of construction of the sewer and water facilities, as shown in Exhibit A. This is in addition to the connection fees and off-site facility fees that are imposed by the County. 4. In any case where a payment by the owner, subdivider or developer is required prior to construction of the sewer and water facilities, the amount paid by the owner, subdivider or developer shall be held in an interest bearing account for the benefit of the owner, subdivider or developer until expended, or, in lieu of such payment, the Board of Supervisors may provide for the posting of a personal, corporate or property bond, cash escrow, letter of credit or other method of performance guarantee satisfactory to it conditioned on payment at commencement of such construction. December 19, 2000 7,~~ Supervisor Minnix moved to adopt the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None ORDINANCE 121900-13 AUTHORIZING THE CREATION OF A LOCAL PUBLIC WORKS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, STABLE ROAD WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT, APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF WATER AND SEWER FACILITIES THEREIN, IMPOSING AND ALLOCATING CERTAIN FEES OR ASSESSMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF PROPERTY LOCATED THEREIN WHEREAS, Ordinance 112288-7 authorizes the financing of local public works improvements and the imposition of special assessments upon abutting property owners upon the adoption of an appropriate ordinance by the Board of Supervisors; and WHEREAS, Sections 15.2-2243, 15.2-2400 and 15.2-2404, et seq. authorize the County to create and establish a general water and sewer improvement program for a designated area of the County having related and common sewer and water conditions, to install certain public works improvements, and to impose fees, charges and assessments for said improvements; and WHEREAS, the extension of the public water and sewer systems and the creation of a special utility service district will alleviate public health and safety problems and promote economic development; and WHEREAS, the Board hereby establishes the "Stable Road Water and Sewer District"; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this Ordinance was held on November 14, 2000, and the second reading and public hearing was held December 19, 2000; and BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the authority of Ordinance 112288-7, the Board authorizes and approves a local public works improvement project, namely, public sewer and water extensions for the Stable Road community. That pursuant to the authority of Section 15.2-2243, the Board establishes a general water and sewer improvement program for the Stable Road community. The total construction cost of this public sewer project is estimated to be $418,766, to be assessed against the properties within the project service district as shown on the attached Exhibit A. That there is hereby appropriated for this project the sum of $418,766 from the General Fund Unappropriated Balance. 2. That the "Stable Road Water and Sewer District" is shown and designated on the attached plat entitled "Clearbrook Area Water and Sewer Service Districts" prepared by the Roanoke County Utility Department, dated November 2000 (Exhibit B). The Utility Department shall construct in and adjacent to the Project Service District sewer and water lines and appurtenant facilities as shown in the map of this area, and shall acquire easements for these lines and facilities. December 19, 2000 7,~~_ Mr. Harrington advised that is a request from First Team Auto Mall to allow construction of a major automobile repair service on their property at 6520 Peters Creek Road and on a portion of the 9.45 acre parcel housing the Hyundai and Suzuki dealerships. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the special use permit with four conditions. Architect and Engineer Craig Balzer, 6429 Spring Run Drive, and David Dillon from First Team Auto Mall were present and responded to questions from the Board. There were no citizens present to speak on this item. After discussion concerning the buffering of the site and that this area is designated a neighborhood conservation area, Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the ordinance with an addition to Condition #1: "if any vegetation within this area is removed or otherwise destroyed due to wind, fire, disease, etc., the property owner shall have the responsibility to replace the vegetation in accordance with the Roanoke County screening standards." The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None ORDINANCE 121900-14 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO FIRST TEAM AUTO MALL FOR MAJOR AUTOMOBILE REPAIR TO BE LOCATED AT THE NORTHEASTERN CORNER OF PETERS CREEK ROAD AND BARRENS ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 27.13=4-2), HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, First Team Auto Mall has filed a petition for a special use permit for major automobile repair to be located at the northeastern corner of Peters Creek Road and Barrens Road (Tax Map No. 27.13-4-2) in the Holtins Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on December 5, 2000; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on November 14, 2000; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on December 19, 2000. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to First Team Auto Mall for major automobile repair to be located at the northeastern December 99, 2000 7,~4 Mr. Harrington advised that this is a request to rezone a vacant .574 acre parcel in the 6200 block of Peters Creek Road to remove the conditions for possible future business construction. The Planning Commission recommended approval with no conditions. Mr. Tim Synder responded to questions from Supervisor Johnson concerning screening and buffering and advised that he plans to retain the buffering on the back boundary. He further stated that one of the reasons for this rezoning is that there is another vacant lot to the east of their property, and there have been discussions about purchasing that property. This would enlarge their space and give, them the ability to place a more suitable tenant on those two lots. There were no citizens present to speak on this item. Supervisor Johnson moved to adopt the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None ORDINANCE 121900-15 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A .574-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED IN THE 5200 BLOCK OF PETERS CREEK ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 37.08-1-2) IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2, CONDITIONAL, TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2. GENERAL COMMERCIAL, UPON THE APPLICATION OF TIM T. SNYDER WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on November 14, 2000, and the second reading and public hearing were held December 1'9, 2000; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on December 5, 2000; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing .574 acres, as described herein, and located in the 5200 block of Peters Creek Road (Tax Map Number 37.08-1-2) in the Hollins Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District, conditional, December 19, 2000 7~~~ Carruth who will be moving to Charlottesville in two or three months to take another position with Adelphia. Supervisor Nickens moved to adopt the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Minnix, Church, Nickens, McNamara NAYS: None ORDINANCE 121900-16 ADOPTING A NEW CABLE TELEVISION ORDINANCE AND APPROVING A FRANCHISE AGREEMENT WHICH RENEWS THE RIGHT OF BLACKSBURG/SALEM CABLEVISION, INC., D/B/A ADELPHIA CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, TO ERECT, CONSTRUCT OPERATE AND MAINTAIN A CABLE TELEVISION SYSTEM (CATV) AND REPEALING ORDINANCE 102594-12 WHEREAS, Blacksburg/Salem Cablevision, Inc., doing business as Adelphia Cable Communications, currently holds a franchise granted by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia to operate a cable televison system within portions of Roanoke County as a counterpart to their operation of a cable television system within the City of Salem, Virginia; and WHEREAS, negotiations have continued over a period of several months in tandem with negotiations between Adelphia Cable Communications and the City of Salem for the renewal of this franchise which originally expired on October 4, 1999, and during which time Adelphia's franchise has been extended for successive periods of three months until January 1, 2001; and WHEREAS, these negotiations have produced agreement between Adelphia and Roanoke County as to the terms of a new cable televison ordinance and franchise agreement which will provide fora substantial upgrade and rebuild of Adelphia's cable system, for continued free cable service to county government buildings, for free Internet service for schools and libraries in Adelphia's service area, for possible increase in the number of public government and educational access (PEG} channels, for continuation of the current five percent (5%) franchise fee payments based upon Adelphia's gross revenues from their cable service and for a substantial monetary grant to permit continued support for the county's educational goals; and WHEREAS, Blacksburg/Salem Cablevision, Inc. is prohibited by federal law from operating a cable televison system within any jurisdiction without a franchise agreement or extension as defined by federal law; and WHEREAS, following adequate public notice, the first reading of this ordinance was held on December 5, 2000, and a public hearing and second reading of this ordinance was held on December 19, 2000, at each of which meeting the public was afforded opportunity for comment. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the attached Cable Television Franchise Ordinance be enacted as Title 7-A of the Roanoke County Code and the County Administrator is December 19, 2000 7~3 Supervisor Minnix: (1) He wished everyone holiday greetings. (2) He advised a citizen on Richland Boulevard that he would contact the Virginia Department of Transportation tomorrow and ask to have her road cleared from recent snow. Supervisor Church: (1) He advised that his first year in office went by extremely fast and he feels that much has been accomplished. He expressed appreciation to the citizens, staff and Board members for their help. He asked everyone to reflect on thoughtfulness, cooperation, forgiveness and love for each other every day and not just during Christmas time. (2) He thanked Chairman McNamara for his leadership this year. Supervisor Nickens: (1) He asked for a projected delivery date of the new garbage trucks. Mr. Hodge advised that there was a delay but all four will be delivered in January, 2001, and expressed appreciation to the Board for approval of the purchase of the trucks. Supervisor McNamara: (1) He echoed Supervisor Johnson's concerns about the budget and economy slowdown but advised that the Board will work together for the citizens. (2) He humourously advised that only one of the Christmas cards he received was from an organization that is not directly or indirectly funded by the County. (3) He thanked the staff for their assistance during his year as Chairman, the Board members for their confidence, and the citizens for electing him to the Board, and advised that he thinks the best representation for the citizens is for the position of chairman to change each year. IN RE: ADJOURNMENT At 8:50 p.m., Chairman McNamara adjourned the meeting to 9:00 a.m. on Tuesday, January 2, 2001 for purpose of an organizational meeting. ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER A-031301-2.a ~' +~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 13, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the Roanoke Valley- Alleghany Regional Commission Metropolitan Planning Organization COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION 1. Roanoke Valley-Alleghany Regional Commission Metropolitan Planning Organization At the February 27, 2001 Board meeting, Supervisor Joseph "Butch" Church indicated his willingness to fill the unexpired term of former Supervisor Fenton Harrison who has resigned. The three-year term will expire July 1, 2002. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the above appointment be confirmed. Submitted by: Approved by, .~ ( c9~' Mary H. Allen CMC Elmer C. Hodge Clerk to the Board County Administrator 1 -_ ~"~ ACTION VOTE No Yes Absent Approved (x) Motion by: H. Odell Minnix motion to Church _ x Denied () approve Johnson _ x Received () McNamara- _ x Referred () Minnix _ x _ To () Nickens _ x cc: File Roanoke Valley-Alleghanv Regional Commission Metropolitan Planning Organization File 2 A-031301-2. b ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~'~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMIlVISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 13, 2001 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Water and Sewer Facilities Serving Winn Dixie Food Store COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Developers of Winn Dixie Food Store, Zimmer Development Company of Virginia, have requested that Roanoke County accept the Deed conveying the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the subdivision along with all necessary easements. The water and sanitary sewer facilities are installed, as shown on plans prepared by Lang Engineering entitled Winn Dixie Food Store, which are on file in the Community Development Department. The water and sanitary sewer facility construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County. FISCAL IMPACT: The value of the water and sanitary sewer construction is $14,400.00 and $1,760.00 respectively. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the Winn Dixie Food Store at Plantation Road along with all necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities. -J- SUBMITTED BY: Gary Robe~sdn, P.E. Utility Dire for APPROVED: ~~~ - ~/.~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE No Yes Absent Approved (x) Motion by: H. Odell Minnix motion to Church _ x Denied () approve Johnson _ x _ Received () McNamara- _ x Referred () Minnix _ x _ To () Nickens _ x cc: File Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development . CC~i~'Y ~-~ THIS CHATTEL DEED, made this 23rd day of June, 2000 =°~~_~, L.P., a Virginia limited partnership, by and between: Zimmer Development Company of Virginia, I=~ ~'~~~_~~~~ hereinafter referred to as the "Developer," party of the first part; and the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COtTNTY, VIRGINIA, its successors or assigns, hereinafter referred to as the "Board," party of the second part. :WITNESSETH: THAT FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual benefits accruing to the parties, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Developer does hereby GRANT, CONVEY, ASSIGivT AND TRANSFER, with dle covenants of GENERAL WARRANTY OF TITLE, in fee simple unto the Board all water and/or sewer lines, valves, fittings, laterals, connections, storage facilities, sources of water supply, pumps, manholes and any and all other equipment and appurtenances thereunto belonging, in and to the water and/or sewer systems in the streets, avenues, public utility, easement areas, water and sewer easement areas that have been or may hereafter be installed by the Developer, along with the right to perpetually use and occupy the easements in which the same may be located, all of which is more particularly shown, described and designated as follows, to wit: As shown on the plan entitled Wim1 Dixie Store-Plantation, made by Jaclc Bess and on file in the Roanoke County Engineering Department. The Developer does hereby covenant and warrant that it will be responsible for the proper installation and construction of the said water and/or sewer systems including repair of surface areas affected by settlement of utility trenches for a period of one (1) year after date of acceptance by the Board and will perform any necessary repairs at its cost. 1 ~~ Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator of Roanoke Cotmty, Virginia, hereby joins in the execution of this instrument to signify the acceptance of this conveyance pursuant to Resolution No. adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, on the day of , 19 99. WITNESS THE FOLLOWING signatures and seals: Developer: _ Zimmer Development Company of Virginia Inc Sole General Partner of Zimmer Development Company of Virginia, L. P. Address: P. O. Box 2628 ~I~N Wilm' n 402 ~v. , H~~ As: _Presid Je r L. Zimmer ~ ^~ Title County/City of: , to wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this: day of By Duly authorized officer (typed name) on behalf o£ Public Its 19 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF NEW HANOVER I, a Notary Public of the County and State aforesaid, certify that Jeffrey L. Zimmer, President of Zimmer Development Company of Virginia, Inc., the sole General Partner of Zimmer Development Company of Virginia, L.P., a Virginia limited partnership, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged that he is the President of the said Zimmer Development Company of Virginia, Inc., a Virginia corporation, and that by authority duly given and as an act of the corporation, as sole General Partner of Zimmer Development Company of Virginia, L.P., a Virginia limited liability company, the foregoing instrument was signed in his name as its Press}~g~}~~~F and sealed with its corporate seal. F WITNESS my hand and official seal, thi~ the day of June, 2000. ,~ ~. ~ ,fir, ~. i/J( «~ ~ g NOTARY PUBLIC ~ , My Commission Expires: ~<~~. r ~•. . '°F n6 q,,~j , . . f`r A/ ,. ~.3 Approved as to form: County Attorney Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia BY~ (SEAL) Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator State o£ Virginia County/City of: Roanoke , to wit: The foregoing instrument was acla~owledged before me this: day of 19 , by Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator, on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. Notary Public My Commission expires: 4 y .~ W • K RJ`N5 ~~`~~~,• aye '' ~~~•~~y cP ~`'~y ~ s~r~ ~"O '~°~ A ~~ gyp, a~c~~1 ~ ~E, ` µ aasoN ~,~ GR@ o,~\ CARVINS V.~C~N~"~`~ ~IYIA~' s~ NORTH .~ o-~ ~' ~ ~!~' O 3i3~ONOJ ~~ ~y .. ,. `. ,. !~ y\ °°° °~ ` '~ 12" WATER LINE ',°-., ~ ~~ ~~ ;fl ~ ~:.. o ~ a o` 7 ti ~ O. v°OCy~ s ~ .y ~ ~ c. ~~ ~ \ `i 6p6 .... aiod7J . `'may ,-s YJ (~ ~ 4\ c !, ~a,~0 \`\ ayr2 .` d y t a ~;. 7 r @-~ y ,~ d, 1~ .~ s WINN-DIXIE FOOD STORE @ PLANTATION ROAD 12OANOI~E COUNTY (Tax Map # 38.16-1-3.7) • UTILITY ~JEPARTIVIENT Acceptance of WATER LINE moo. V~G'~N~T ~' ~fA~' .g'i` -- ~.. r .. ~. r -yam ~- ~1 ~~ `- ".r .•~~ '/'~ ~ 'P q L--- F.YIST Jiwr~ 974.67 Rim ~2 ~s r rt .. °''"~" C ~t<`~0 O ~',pG~ ' in = 95 7.91 v out = 967.55 I ~, ~' ~ ~ '~ ~~' ~ n INV 8" IN = 968.50 ON °c~~Or <`Py ~ gEµiER CONNECTI ~Or r" ~' gY ROANOKE COUNTY ~~,pQGr ~W. .p ~ 1' '9i ,fl n~ 2J 6' °~ ~ ~~ `tom.. ~ o c j ~ `r \\ , ~ ~~ d~~ ~o~~" .c .,,, A-031301-2.c ACTION N0. ITEM NUMBER ~'' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 13, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: Request from Schools to approve $7,121 budget amendment for Roanoke Valley Regional Board COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: d """`. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Roanoke Valley Regional Board is requesting a budget amendment in the current 2000-,2001 fiscal year. Due to an increase in student population, we are requiring additional staff. One position was moved from the elementary level to the secondary level due to student numbers and service requirements. The Regional Board is requesting to increase their overall budget by $7,121 for the current fiscal year. FISCAL IMPACT: Since the Hearing Impairment Program's currently at 100 percent capacity with 31 students, the program will generate enough revenue to cover the total cost of the program. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Roanoke Valley Regional Board and the Roanoke Valley Regional Directors recommend the approval of the amendment request of $7, 121 for the current fiscal year. ~s*/J / ie'°p~ Dr. Patricia Radcliffe ~~~tic.~= C,~~I~C-~` Elme~rwC. Hodge Director of Special Education County Administrator ACTION VOTE No Yes Absent Approved (x) Motion by: H. Odell Minnix motion to Church _ x _ Denied ( ) approve Johnson _ x Received ( ) McNamara- _ x Referred ( ) Minnix _ x _ To ( ) Nickens _ x _ cc: File Dr. Patricia Radcliffe, Director of Special Education Danial Morris, Director, Finance Dr. Linda Weber, School Superintendent Brenda Chastain, Clerk, School Board ACTION N0. A-031301-2.d ITEM NUMBER ..aL.."'~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 13, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: Request from Schools to accept and appropriate $700 grant from the Virginia Commission for the Arts COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : a~„~,,,~~~„~,~,..,~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Virginia Commission for the Arts approved a grant in the amount of $700 for Roanoke County Schools to apply toward performances by the Virginia Opera for Roanoke County's elementary schools. A check in the amount of $595 was received on February 2, 2001. As per the contract with the Commission, the balance of $105 will be sent to the school division upon receipt of the final report. FISCAL IMPACT: None STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Appropriation of be utilized as stated. (~7~ ~/a~-.30~~~", ;E,'l4'j Mr. James G. Denton Coordinator of Fine Arts the $700 grant to the grant fund to Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE No Yes Absent Approved (x) Motion by: H. Odell Minnix motion to Church ._ x Denied ( ) approve Johnson _ x Received ( ) McNamara- _ x Referred ( ) Minnix _ x ._ To ( ) Nickens _ x _. cc: File James G. Denton, Coordinator of Fine Arts Danial Morris, Director, Finance Dr. Linda Weber, School Superintendent Brenda Chastain, Clerk, School Board s „~ ~ _. A-031301-2.e ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~. "~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 13, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: Acceptance of $5,000 Grant from the Virginia Tourism Corporation designated for the advertising and promotion of the upcoming ValleyFest IV event at Green Hill Park on June 8 - 9, 2001. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~ C~ a~~~~M BACKGROUND: ValleyFest IV has grown from a Saturday afternoon of live music in the park into a two day event featuring local musicians, the largest Car and Truck Show in the region, arts and crafts, a kite competition, children's entertainment, and allot-Air Balloon competition and show. The highlight of the festival is each evening's balloon glow choreographed to music, which attracted thousands of spectators. The Parks, Recreation, and Tourism Department and the steering committee's goal for this year is to add more attractions, increase the number of balloons to 20, and to increase attendance. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Virginia Tourism Grant allows us to increase our advertising and promotion of the event to reach a larger audience. The target market will be residents within a 100 mile radius of Green Hill Park. FISCAL IMPACT: None. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of the Virginia Tourism Grant in the amount of $5,000. 1 ,- , .. -. Respectfully submitted, Debbie Pitts Assistant Director of Recreation Approved by, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ----------------------------------- ACTION VOTE No Yes Absent Approved (x) Motion by: H. Odell Minnix motion to Church _ x Denied () approve Johnson _ x Received () McNamara- _ x Referred () Minnix _ x _ To () Nickens _ x cc: File Debbie Pitts, Assistant Director of Recreation Danial Morris, Director, Finance i . A-031301-2.f ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~~"`~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 13, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: Acceptance of $1,000 donation from the FAB SK Race held in August, 2000 at Green Hill Park for improvements at Green Hill Park that support special events. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~r~a~•~l BACKGROUND: Green Hill Park is Roanoke County's main venue for major special events for the community and the region, however, it lacks many amenities to support the events. The FAB SK race is a community-organized event cosponsored by the Parks, Recreation, and Tourism Department and has become a very popular local event. The organizers have requested that the net revenue from the event be designated for capital improvements at the park to enhance and improve our already successful schedule of events. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: These funds will be the first major community donation toward a capital improvement budget for the Green Hill Park special event area. Many community groups have expressed an interest in contributing to this project to provide a new stage area, equipment storage, improved lighting, improved parking, utility connections, and restroom facilities. Staff is excited about the community's interest in Green Hill Park and look forward to this donation growing into a source of funding to make incremental improvements at the park. FISCAL IMPACT: None STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of the FAB Sk donation in the amount of $1,000. r J ~- ~ Respectfully submitted, ~. ~~ Debbie Pitts Assistant Director of Recreation Approved by, ~~ //,~ Elmer C. Hod e County Administrator ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE No Yes Absent Approved (x) Motion by: H. Odell Minnix motion to Church _ x Denied () approve Johnson _ x _ Received () McNamara- _ x Referred () Minnix _ x _ To () Nickens _ x cc: File Debbie Pitts, Assistant Director of Recreation Danial Morris, Director, Finance ACTION NO. A-031301-2.g ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 13, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: Request to Appropriate $24,250 for Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) Family Violence Intervention Program in the Department of Social Services COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: The Department of Social Services receives, throughout the year, additional appropriations for public assistance and services delivery. The State has made available an additional $24,250 State money for the TANF Family Violence Intervention Program. The Department of Social Services cannot access these State funds until the County has appropriated the same. The Board of Supervisors is requested to appropriate $24,250 to the Social Services budget and to appropriate the related revenues from the State. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact; 100% state funded STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends appropriation of $24,250 to the 00/01 Social Services budget for the TANF Family Violence Prevention Program. 1 +• M •I ~!~ Respectfully submitted, c Betty . McCrary, P . Director of Social Services Approved by, ~/'-'m"' ~~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE No Yes Absent Approved (x) Motion by: H. Odell Minnix motion to Church _ x _ Denied () a prove Johnson _ x Received () McNamara- _ x Referred () Minnix _ x To O Nickens _ x cc: File Betty McCrary, Director, Social Services Danial Morris, Director, Finance Brent Robertson, Director, Finance John Chambliss, Assistant Administrator 2 ', ~ ~ ~ .- G.f AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 13, 2001 RESOLUTION 031301-2.h OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS INITIATING THE ABANDONMENT OF ARTHUR THURMAN ROAD FROM THE VIRGINIA SECONDARY SYSTEM OF STATE HIGHWAYS WHEREAS, safe, efficient, and controlled access is of critical importance to the proposed Hidden Valley High School slated to open in the Fall of 2002; and, WHEREAS, using Arthur Thurman Road, (State Secondary Route 1551), as the route of proposed access to the high school was discussed during the siting of the high school in 1999; and, WHEREAS, to achieve safe access to the high school Secondary Route 1551, from Pleasant Hill Drive to its western end, a distance of approximately 105 feet, appears to no longer serve general public conveyance warranting its maintenance at public expense and should be abandoned as part of the Secondary System of State Highways. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA as follows: 1. The County Administrator is authorized to initiate all necessary steps to initiate the abandonment of this section of roadway. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Salem District Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: 1 . , .~ AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Church, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor McNamara A COPY TESTE: ~• Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Department of Community Development Virginia Department of Transportation 2 1 ACTION NO. ITEM N0. ~~~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 13, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS INITIATING THE ABANDONMENT OF ARTHUR THURMAN ROAD FROM THE VIRGINIA SECONDARY SYSTEM OF STATE HIGHWAYS COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ,~J_~,,r~,,,~ BACKGROUND: On February 13, 2001 the resolution initiating the dis Upon further discussions with as opposed to discontinuance, accomplish the School Board's Hidden Valley High School. Board of Supervisors approved a continuance of Arthur Thurman Road. VDOT, it appears that abandonment, is a preferred procedure to objectives regarding access to Arthur Thurman Road was included within the Virginia State Secondary System for maintenance circa 1947. This undeveloped right-of-way extends approximately 105 feet from Pleasant Run Drive, towards the site of the new Hidden Valley High School. The Roanoke County School Board wishes to use the Arthur Thurman Road right-of-way as the point of principal access to the new high school. They have requested that the right-of-way be abandoned from the Secondary System of State Highways so that future private access to the right-of-way can be restricted. Only the Commonwealth Transportation Board has the authority to remove a road from the state secondary system. Roanoke ~"'~~ 2 County can initiate the abandonment process by the adoption of a resolution to the Virginia Department of Transportation. A resolution initiating abandonment has been prepared for your consideration. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: 1. Adopt the enclosed resolution initiating abandonment of State Secondary Route 1551 as part of the Virginia Secondary Highway System. Respectfully Submitted, ~e~ V ~Lf4C( p` . Terrance L. Harring A CP Department of Community Development Action Vote No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Approved, ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Church _ Johnson McNamara Minnix Nickens r- y AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, March 13, 2001 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS INITIATING THE ABANDONMENT OF ARTHUR THURMAN ROAD FROM THE VIRGINIA SECONDARY SYSTEM OF STATE HIGHWAYS WHEREAS, safe, efficient, and controlled access is of critical importance to the proposed Hidden Valley High School slated to open in the Fall of 2002; and, WHEREAS, using Arthur Thurman Road, (State Secondary Route 1551) , as the route of proposed access to the high school was discussed during the siting of the high school in 1999; and, WHEREAS, to achieve safe access to the high school Secondary Route 1551, from Pleasant Hill Drive to its western end, a distance of approximately 105 feet, appears to no longer serve general public conveyance warranting its maintenance at public expense and should be abandoned as part of the Secondary System of State Highways. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA as follows: 1. The County Administrator is authorized to initiate all necessary steps to initiate the abandonment of this section of roadway. 1 . ~ ~~ BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Salem District Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. 2 r iv AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 13, 2001 RESOLUTION 031301-2.i EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY UPON THE RETIREMENT OF VICTORIA S. DILLARD, SOCIAL SERVICES, AFTER TWENTY-ONE YEARS OF SERVICE WHEREAS, Victoria S. Dillard was first employed by Roanoke County on February 1, 1979 in the Social Services Department as a Clerk Typist; and also served as Clerk III, Eligibility Worker and Senior Eligibility Worker; and WHEREAS, Ms. Dillard retired from Roanoke County on February 1, 2001 as a Social Services Aide I after twenty-one years of service; and WHEREAS, Ms. Dillard served all of the Roanoke County residents she came in contact with while employed as a Social Services Aide or Eligibility Worker with great care and concern; and WHEREAS, Ms. Dillard was instrumental in the formation of the Case Management System, a vital tool used by the Department's Eligibility Staff in conducting their complex duties; and WHEREAS, Ms. Dillard, through her employment with Roanoke County, has been instrumental in improving the quality of life for its citizens, as well as her co-workers at the Department of Social Services. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke 1 y. County expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to VICTORIA S. DILLARD for twenty-one years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke County. FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy, restful, and productive retirement. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Church, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor McNamara A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Dr. Betty McCrary, Director, Social Services Joe Sgroi, Director, Human Resources 2 ~°"- E~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 13, 2001 RESOLUTION EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY UPON THE RETIREMENT OF VICTORIA S. DILLARD, SOCIAL SERVICES, AFTER TWENTY-ONE YEARS OF SERVICE WHEREAS, Victoria S. Dillard was first employed by Roanoke County on February 1, 1979 in the Social Services Department as a Clerk Typist; and also served as Clerk III, Eligibility Worker and Senior Eligibility Worker; and WHEREAS, Ms. Dillard retired from Roanoke County on February 1, 2001 as a Social Services Aide I after twenty-one years of service; and WHEREAS, Ms. Dillard served all of the Roanoke County residents she came in contact with while employed as a Social Services Aide or Eligibility Worker with great care and concern; and WHEREAS, Ms. Dillard was instrumental in the formation of the Case Management System, a vital tool used by the Department's Eligibility Staff in conducting their complex duties; and WHEREAS, Ms. Dillard, through her employment with Roanoke County, has been instrumental in improving the quality of life for its citizens, as well as her co-workers at the Department of Social Services. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke 1 ~-/~ County expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to VICTORIA S. DILLARD for twenty-one years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke County. FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy, restful, and productive retirement. 2 ..~ ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 13, 2001 RESOLUTION 031301-2.i ADOPTING GUIDELINES FOR THE 2001 REDISTRICTING OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA WHEREAS, on February 27, 2001, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County held a public hearing to receive public comments on developing guidelines for the redistricting of Roanoke County in accordance with the decennial census; and WHEREAS, notice of this public hearing was published in the Roanoke Times and World News, the Salem Times Register, the Vinton Messenger, and the Roanoke Tribune; and written notice was sent to numerous civic organizations; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors finds that the following procedures shall guide the 2001 redistricting process. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County as follows: 1. That Roanoke County shall continue to be divided into five single-member election districts; and 2. That the Town of Vinton should be contained entirely within one district; and 3. That each district will have equal population based upon the 2000 Census, with no more than aplus/minus 5% deviation between districts; and 4. That each district should be compact and contiguous, unusual elongations or irregularity of boundaries should be avoided; and 5. That each district shall be identified by clearly definable and distinguishable boundaries such as streets, rivers, streams, drainage features, or other permanent physical 1 r features shown on official maps; and 6. That districts should reflect "communities of interest" taking into consideration rural, suburban and urban interests, as well as income and neighborhood characteristics; and 7. That the location of racial or language minorities should be identified for the purpose of establishing districts; and 8. That one or more Roanoke County redistricting plans shall be prepared by Roanoke County Registrar Diane St.John, County Planner Terry Harrington, and County Attorney Paul Mahoney. 9. That this resolution shall be effective from and after the date of its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Church, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor McNamara A COPY TESTE: ~- Mary H. Alle , CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Diane St. John, County Registrar Terry Harrington, County Planner G: \COMMON\March 13 \resolution.wpd 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. Z'~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 13, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution adopting guidelines for the 2001 redistricting of Roanoke County, Virginia COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Attached is a resolution adopting guidelines for the 2001 redistricting process for Roanoke County. On February 27, 2001, the Board held the public hearing on the adoption of these guidelines, and it received numerous citizen comments. The attached resolution reflects the comments and concerns of the citizens of Roanoke County as well as the members of the Board of Supervisors. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board favorably consider the adoption of the attached resolution. Respectfully submitted, Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Vote No Yes Abs _Church Johnson McNamara Minnix Nickens G:\ATTORNEY\SPB\REDIS\report.frm 1 "`~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 13, 2001 RESOLUTION ADOPTING GUIDELINES FOR THE 2001 REDISTRICTING OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA WHEREAS, on February 27, 2001, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County held a public hearing to receive public comments on developing guidelines for the redistricting of Roanoke County in accordance with the decennial census; and WHEREAS, notice of this public hearing was published in the Roanoke Times and World News, the Salem Times Register, the Vinton Messenger, and the Roanoke Tribune; and written notice was sent to numerous civic organizations; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors finds that the following procedures shall guide the 2001 redistricting process. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County as follows: 1. That Roanoke County shall continue to be divided into five single-member election districts; and 2. That the Town of Vinton shouldbe contained entirely within one district; and That each district will have equal population based upon the 2000 Census, with no more than aplus/minus 5% deviation between districts; and 4. That each district shouldbe compact and contiguous, unusual elongations or irregularity of boundaries shouldbe avoided; and 5. That each district shall be identified by clearly defmable and distinguishable boundaries such as streets, rivers, streams, drainage features, or other permanent physical features shown on official maps; and 6. That districts should reflect "communities of interest" taking into consideration rural, ,~ ° ~~' suburban and urban interests, as well as income and neighborhood characteristics; and 7. That the location of racial or language minorities should be identified for the purpose of establishing districts; and 8. That one or more Roanoke County redistricting plans shall be prepared by Roanoke County Registrar Diane St.John, County Planner Terry Harrington, and County Attorney Paul Mahoney. 9. That this resolution shall be effective from and after the date of its adoption. G: \ATTORNEY\SPB\REDIS\resolution.wpd THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, IN REGULAR MEETING ON THE 13TH DAY OF MARCH 2001, ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING: RESOLUTION 031301-2.k REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF OLD BLACK HORSE ROAD AND A PORTION OF CAROLINA TRAIL INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM WHEREAS, the streets described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(a), fully incorporated herein by reference, are shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, and WHEREAS, the Resident Engineerforthe Virginia Department of Transportation has advised this Board the streets meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation, and WHEREAS, the County and the Virginia Department of Transportation have entered into an agreement on March 9, 1999, for comprehensive stormwater detention which applies to this request for addition, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(A) to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right- of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote Moved By: Supervisor Minnix Seconded By: None Required Yeas: Supervisors Johnson, Church, Nickens, Minnix Nays: None Absent: Supervisor McNamara A Copy Teste: yx.a..~.,~~ ,~ . Q.~..e,t...~ Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Virginia Department of Transportation 4 .. .. J/ 6120 / 20a ~ ~~a. a - - K. 4~ c1... 8j ~tie~~ ~0 e ~ •+.* . ''17 ... ~~~•r B. ISA ~ 1,25 Ar.. 0112 ° ~ ~ t~'~ sl J5 ~ "~ ~" in ` ~'. a~~'~u. ~' tY+ A ~~ r'1.r '3g p;, vG ,' _~ ~ . 2rU ~ 7GA~ NEV. yy E70B ,w '~' "^, r,1 _'lA 1"h ~ cuss-4 7 ~ i7 6078 1_'l, p,`-,° . .1rJ _. ib" ° 6107 a.S2 ?~6, ro. ~~ Avi %"7:i,>1 OS Gl04 ~~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ `'~ 7; G017 iV ~ 3Jv :'; 6074 o ~ ~U_ y ~ ~,~? o ,~' slos (/,~.i ... OCtjOjj n.~\ 4~,~ ~~ ,~;-,°~' Isa e B ~ ~ 1,-. .. 601J 7.B ,..~~ 5.G1 Ac. ~ Fi025 "" ' a ,.~ 60/0 5946 oy 'J ,~ iryi ^} G021 ^i- ~ ~ .E'Og. i; 241n `? ~- o < '~ 5702 Ir ~~ -.~ h ,n v 6 E, ,I"n 6005 ;?u: q / r)u CaJ'CJ ;C).OU 6017 r.';. 13 ~V 15 571`\Av;' 'ig.&3 ' l i 6032 t•9, i/p -, j1~Lt 1 _ 7Q.0 6071 4' _ 12 600E G ~. -t •i.G2 }~9 ti w - l (i: 1. .-. ~, . J ~ 'A^ F) 6028 u0 ~ ~ N ~' ~ '` ` f J i y ,- ,, i ~~ '"qun ~ G005 1 s'' 7 4 1 / i%~ °. [j 6024 -.;,UO' i ..,~ lr2 ~ ... v LG- 20M1 ~. I l ~ ° ij, 6020 B'~U.1 7:ai - r. 1.02 Ac. ,Y 6 > ~a O / q: ` U, .•C)0 L~ ~ _ ~%\ r, 22` ~,+~* 5947 <`"~ ~ F0~0ir A ~ ;i GO1E %, ~+~ •~ '~D G3 rn 6001 ~ ., ~ ~: % ~`~ ;YU ti. +.: ~. iit) ~ ~ d 60i2 ..t u0 '° Se .. 1 .R ~ ®s.,. ~ ;'.,i _ ~ 6008 / ~.i)q 9 0 ^ Oj1 7 ~, c l o~~ r,c.~ ~ J v l 6004 ~.i) / N "`L4 'n -< r„+ r '•.r' iii t 1 ^ % [ 8 ~ 0 591J or ,.~ :, 'use ~.eG, 002 1 LO /4 i. £,000 /r'3 ~U 6` ._ „i ,fir ~,n 8f o;p C'0 C~41~ 'r/U 5909 : ° ~ .v ~ti¢. ! 7 0 / w, 5924 1 " 5 iy,'o l0A /... Jr: I l ..u0 d 0C) 5905 .-" U r;'Q ~ _ ) _J rc ..5 ~) ~ 5920 ~ :, C• f•50 5901 ~A ,r 5.25 Ac.(0) ~ s'. ); ._, ~ Jm ! 5916 / ,.; OU ~C '~'. b5 ~,.ey pc.(c) ~bs r"*ai_ ...`A J l~ J 9e ~t '~ % "'- ~ lr~ 1/ 5912 hu. U(i A I - lr. 1 PROPOSED ADDITION SHOWN IN GRAY '' G, ~ ; ~ ;e -~ ~ ; 5904 ,'~-_:, ;~ ,4,VC ~ /... ti~ G 1 I ~~~ U 'a~.y ! , r l 3 `n / I 5900 ..`~ A ,x' DESCRIPTION: - 1) Old Blaclc Horse Road -From the intersection of Carolina Trail to its cul-de-sac. 2. Carolina Trail -From the intersection of Stone House Lane to the intersection of Old Blaclc Horse Road. LENGTH: (1) 0.05 MILES (2) 0.11 MILES RIGHT OF WAY: (1) 50 FEET (2) 50 FEET PAVEMENT WIDTH: (1.) 30 FEET (2) 36 FEET SERVICE (1) 9 HOMES (2) 11 HOMES 1~ DAlYC~~ C~ZI.~YTY 1?EP~~T~~T1VT ~0.~' BELLE GROVE, SECTIONS 1 ~ 2 Acceptance ofOld. Blaclc Horse Road. anal a portion of Carolina Trail. into th.e Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. '•. • a 1 C m E L U RJ m CS O E d CI i.. 4 C O U d • O M c'7 a O ~ N m ~ ~ _ E 2 O ,,,., c ~ m ~ ~ z o ~, o - o H ~ ~ C.J Q ~ Czl a ~ ~ ~ y o ~ w a ~ ~ L Q 4. ~ ~ t h (~ Q ~Q W ~ r'~ W M ~ m c ,~, O IS.. Y V! Cn 'B ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ F- ~ `o ~ E m E Q <` Z t`l G\ ~ ~ N ~ 4 C ~ V, 1' s N o :, z ~ U ti m ~ ~ m ~~ ~ o ^- ~ ~ 0 0 0 < U m O !~- Z '~ ~ v O in O in m O a m O a m Q a m E a m C a m C a m 4 a m v` 5 "' C ~ m ~ ~ a 9 V ~ 4 O d ~ ~ ~ ~ C y z O I ~ ~ a E-~ ~'^ ~ m m m m of n m I ~ O V Cx7 W m O O O O O ~ c ~ m m is is 25 ¢ 2S ¢ ~ ¢ 2S Q ~ ¢ `o ' 4 ~ ~ Q E Ll q U p O O 0 6 O ~ O (J ~ 4 -, ~ ~ u. C r- a u. ~ ~- a ~i p r- a. ii r- a ~ ~- a ~ ~- a S r- a ~ m ~ x W C ~ V7 C n ~j x O :O m ~ 2,C a '~ Z P~ ,07 a `e ~ U m ~ x z ~ N' t7 ~ ~ N 10 h d z ~~ 0 a 0 a a C r= E Z ~ w ~ ~ < '~ ~ `o t ~ ~- a O e O a 4 V ~ LL ~ )-- U CL ~ U E S d ~S t ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 13, 2001 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Old Black Horse Road and a portion of Carolina Trail into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Belle Grove Development Corporation, Phase II, Inc., the developer of Belle Grove, Section 2, requests that the Board of Supervisors approve a resolution to the Virginia Department of Transportation requesting that they accept 0.05 mile of Old Black Horse Road, from the intersection of Carolina Trail to its cul-de-sac, and 0.11 mile of Carolina Trail from the intersection of Stone House Lane to the intersection of Old Black Horse Road. Staff has inspected these roads, along with representatives of the Virginia Department of Transportation, and found the road is acceptable. No county funding is required. Staff recommends that the Board approve a resolution to VDOT requesting that they accept Old Black Horse Road and a portion of Carolina Trail into the Secondary Road System. 1 ~' ~ T S MITTED BY: APPROVED: 1. \. ~ e,~ C Arnold Covey, Director Elmer C. Hodge Department of Community D velopment County Administrator Approved () Motion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Church Johnson McNamara Minnix Nickens 2 --~- THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, IN REGULAR MEETING ON THE 13TH DAY OF MARCH 2001, ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING: RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF OLD BLACK HORSE ROAD AND A PORTION OF CAROLINA TRAIL INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM WHEREAS, the streets described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(a), fully incorporated herein by reference, are shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, and WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised this Board the streets meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation, and WHEREAS, the County and the Virginia Department of Transportation have entered into an agreement on March 9, 1999, for comprehensive stormwater detention which applies to this request for addition, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(A) to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision ~~# Rye uirements. and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right- of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote A Copy Teste: Moved by: Seconded by: Yeas: Nays: Mary Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors pc: Arnold Covey, Director, Department of Community Development Virginia Department of Transportation File r 6120. ) .. - 7DA `.. , < 3> i ~titi 20 'U 5`' ~~a ~' ~~ '': e 1 I_ 7sa i.zs 6117 ~° ~ .~ 6715 ~ 1l ~a~"1y.~. cl. ,.~t~i?~ F Cis - ~i,~ h - ~.$->. 1` ~~ ley ~i ` 7(i4 *~ / O ,~ 1 d, ~, lc" ~ ,,;' 6,17 =55.x, _ 6roe ~' - ih ~u"""', ~.~ n, ?la - ~ ;7A ~JV Og ~ U ;°~ 107 ~ti 7 a7^.6> ^' lv 601Bj ]..~~ ~" ,tJ ~., Ll,i,ia 6 s7 - 05 6704 v ~~ ~ 6074 h 6017 ~` ~U c, Gy l ~~a 14A gip; _ N ~~ '~G )tie o ~`~ sloJ l 'r)3 _. ~~CtjO~ ~ °~u ., ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~' IBa~ • 9~:1 :~ ~~'. _ ~ ~ I o c025 ~ ,6~~ q 14 6D,D .. ~,;~ 6o731.B .;!``- i.o~ n~. ~~ i.~ ~ 5946 ~' eN 'sG~, ~' 5027 ~ r~~ ~~ ~ ~)..;;> za~~~ ~ c~ ~ ;. / ~ ~ „w 6009 72s ., 3a 1107 / EcS, i;i7 C.. Gy I, l GG. 6017 ~ 6006 , V 1 ~7 77A a a ~ - 17 43 ib -.-: ~a .~J~ l 6037 _,,, i';G ~ 171d 7G. 6017 ~ n-62 19 act - l ~ E) 6028 ~ ~0 ~ ~ ~/ ~ , l ~~ `GO, Cip 1¢i 1~. .~. 6005 / ~ ~~ 6x74 00 ~ 9. _ ,.~ i; ,, 6007 ~ ~s . ~ ).uz H~.. l "~ .~ 6020 up ~.GO ,.yl ~, ~ 720 ~ ~ _ -1 !'~~ 5942 CO fir, 7 ~ ~ 6016 0 ; GG 'Sy, ~'~ 6007 ~ . -,= ~ 7 ~.~ 1 ~ •'~ ~c. .. ,~y . s m _ Or . .- 7 5 j / 6072 i l~ `Sect1 ~ moo„ 7`+ ~ a +s~ s> .r ~ ~~ 6oaB , sG `'s ' 011 ~ - 1 ti3 _ > ~. ~s aw m 1, / / %~ N 24 ~; -' ~`, ~ h~ ~~. _ ~ n ~ r 6004 , ~.rir; t j U 5973 ~ ,~ a-.F 6 , - i LO ko l 6000 /''3.Op f ': Z 85.Op 5909 l~ ~ ~~ ' ~~. Gp ~~•-~7~~J 7 i~ l° ~ l~ ~ 15924 ,l 6:,00 ~ ~1711d °S.Uq 5905 w 2U c.,~1 ~~~ f 5 /fit /~ i v^ -~ ~~ l ~ 5920 / ~:, ~ _ ES.Gp 5901 5) arGn ~/ ~ 9A~r ~ ~1 7 i o rl 5916 /l ~ :;.0a IC~ 's-85 ~~ ,~.~I ~ a (~~ ~ rh7 ~ ~a l l~ ~ l l ~ ~ <~9 n.(i,i `;~ 1/ ,,~ t _ l° i~ l 5917 ryG.UG 1 l ~ /~ / /0 5 le 5908 i ~0GG % r'-' GA / .' N: -di '" 1 5904 lA%. 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ PROPOSED ADDITION SHOWN IN GRAY t> /~ ~ _ , - _;> ~= ~~uCi / is / ~ V~ 1 1 5900 :.~ G / h~"~ 'S.0' / jai / ~> / DESCRIPTION: 11 Old Black Horse Road -From the intersection of Carolina Trail to its cul-de-sac. 2. Carolina Trail -From the intersection of Stone House Lane to the intersection of Old Black Horse Road. LENGTH: (1) 0.05 MILES (2) 0.11 MILES RIGHT OF WAY: (1) 50 FEET (2) 50 FEET ~ PAVEMENT WIDTH: (1) 30 FEET ES (~) (2) 1 HOMES I SERVICE (I) 9 HOM _ ----- BELLE GROVE, SECTIONS 1 & 2 .RDANfI~' G'O~LNTY' D.E1~9~3'~~'N?' {j~ Acceptance of Old. Blacl: Horse Road. and a ~©~~,U~l~,~, ~~~`Y.~'LD~13~~`Nfi portion of Carolina Trail. into the Virgiliia Department of Transportation Secondary System ~ -~ ~1 F~ c C m L < U ~ ~C p Q M `e O N E c ~. ~ m 5 N O O ~-+ U a' w S "' ~c *p ~ O W ~0 7 W ~ rM 0 \/ b W a ~1 w 6 m 5 Y ~ 'LJ u ,a o ~ N ~ o L ~ U E R ~ Z n M ~ ~ N ~ N O C r r ~ ~ ~ z ~ U ~ ~ ~~ m ~, o -: ~ o 0 0 < U m 0 r- Z n 3 0 ~n 0 ~n m o m a i m a m o m a m a m a a a a a a a a ~ x O O O O ~ ~ ~ ~ °< o ~ o ~ ~ b ~ i ~ ~ a `~ H ... H J W H J W m 0 m m ~ m Ci ~ ^ m O CpJ ~~ ~ O O O d m H ~ F-~ H-I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~~ a ~~ b ~ FF ~F E ~~ a ~ `. u r°- a u `. ~°- a i°- a ~b ~ a ` r°- a. u `. ~-° d ~-° a X m R+ ~ L N O 'C L m x ~CC,,~~ H a' Z ~-J W ~-~ a e _ O G Z ~ N' f7 f to m ~ w d Z ~-~2- Z w U LL Z U LL N It w U A-031301-2.1 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~ ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 13, 2001 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Water and Sewer Facilities Serving Belle Grove, Section 2 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: p~~w~` SUMMARY OF IlVFORMATION: The Developers of Belle Grove Section 2, Parsell & Zeigler, have requested that Roanoke County accept the Deed conveying the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the subdivision along with all necessary easements. The water and sanitary sewer facilities are installed, as shown on plans prepared by Pierson Engineering & Surveying entitled Belle Grove, Section 2, which are on file in the Community Development Department. The water and sanitary sewer facility construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County. FISCAL IMPACT: The value of the water and sanitary sewer construction is $32,700.00 and $33,300.00 respectively. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the Belle Grove, Section 2 subdivision along with all necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities. ~'- ~3 SUBMITTED BY: Gary Robert on, P.E. Utility Director APPROVED: gyp.-~.. /~.~~. Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE No Yes Absent Approved (x) Motion by: H. Odell Minnix motion to Church _ x Denied () approve Johnson _ x Received () McNamara- _ x Referred () Minnix _ x To () Nickens _ x cc: File Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development ~~ COPY Return To: Roanoke County Attorney's Office THIS CHATTEL DEED, made this 1st day of March 2001, by and between Belle Grove Development Core Phase II, Inc., aV~rginia Corporation, hereinafter referred to as the "Developer," party of the first part; and the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, its successors or assigns, hereinafter referred to as the "Board," party of the second part. WITNESSETH: THAT FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual benefits accruing to the parties, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Developer does hereby GRANT, CONVEY, ASSIGN AND TRANSFER, with the covenants of GENERAL WARRANTY OF TITLE, in fee simple unto the Board all water and/or sewer lines, valves, fittings, laterals, connections, storage facilities, sources of water supply, pumps, manholes and any and. all other equipment and appurtenances thereunto belonging, in and to the water and/or sewer systems in the streets, avenues, public utility, easement areas, water and sewer easement areas that have been or may hereafter be installed by the Developer, along with the right to perpetually use and occupy the easements in which the same maybe located, all of which is more particularly shown, described and designated as follows, to wit: ~-/3 As shown on the plan entitled rzonp r'rnvn PhacP TI , made by p~Prson En~inePring ~ urveying And on file in the Roanoke County Department of Community Development. The Developer does hereby covenant and warrant that it will be responsible for the proper installation and construction of the said water and/or sewer systems including repair of surface areas affected by settlement of utility trenches for a period of one (1) year after date of acceptance by the Board and will preform any necessary repairs at its cost. Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby joins in the elecution of this instrument to signify the acceptance of this conveyance pursuant to Resolution No adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, on the day of , 2~ 2 WITNESS THE FOLLOWING signatures and seals: Developer: 1~'~~~-~-,._...~- '~-r--~~;~~_ ~-°-~j ~ ~~ c~----~ -'"J Address: ~ ~ Z , cv /~/: /~2~7'-(-~-f j 1 Title State of: Virgii2ia , County/City of: Roanoke , to wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this: ~„~ ,day of yfarrh , 20~ ~ , By: Terry Parsell Its President Duly authorized officer (typed name) Title on behalf of: Belle Grove Development Corp., Phase II, Inc. n ~~% ~;% ~, Notarv/1?ublic My Commission expires: ." ~~~-~- ~-~0 dog ~ 3 Approved as to form: County Attorney State of: County/City of By: Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator EAL) Virginia Roanoke , to wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this: day of ~ 20 by Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator, on behalf of the Board. of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. Notary Public My Commission expires: 4 '~CpIJTATlOA! ROAD 0 C /Oj ' / SNAOY/ECC AR1YE ~I ~'~1V ~~'~ 1ylA~' Belle Grove, Section 2 It®ANOKE COUNTY UTILITY ~EP_4RT1VIEl~'T Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities ~' -f GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA of General Amount Fund Revenues Audited Beginning Balance at July 1, 2000 $9,908,641 8.33% Oct 24, 2000 Funds for twenty additional paramedic firefighters (907,000) and planning for renovations to Vinton, Read Mountain, and Mason Cove stations ,Dec 19, 2000 County's half share in Phase I Construction Costs (500,000) for McDonald Farm business park Dec 19, 2000 Advance of funds for water and sewer improvements (500,000) for the Stable Road Water and Sewer District ($418,766) and traffic signal and road improvement ($81,234) in the Clearbrook community Jan 9, 2001 Matching funds for TEA-21 grant to construct the Green Hill Park section of the Roanoke River Greenway ($41,700) Balance at March 13, 2001 $7,959,941 6.69% Changes below this line are for information and planning purposes only. Balance from above $7,959,941 Jan 23,2001 Potential use for Phase II NPDES stormwater assessment (40,000) Feb 1, 2001 Delinquent PG&E Investment (Note: this was a pooled investment and if it is ultimately uncollected the loss will be shared with the other participants that have funds that are being invested by the County Treasurer) ($989,447) $6,930,494 5.82% Note: On December 18, 1990, the Board of Supervisors adopted a goal statement to maintain the General Fund Unappropriated Balance at 6.25% of General Fund Revenues 2000 - 2001 General Fund Revenues $118,982,797 6.25% of General Fund Revenues $7,436,425 Respectfully Submitted, Danial Morris Director of Finance Appr ved By~ ~~~~ ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ~• CAPITAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Amount Balance from June 27, 2000 Board meeting $279,722.09 Addition for sale of land and equipment during 1999-2000 303,501.34 Audited beginning balance at June 30, 2000 583,223.43 Transfer from 1999-2000 departmental savings 224,701.00 Balance at March 13, 2001 $807,924.43 Respectfully Submitted, Danial Morris Director of Finance Approved B~~ ~~~ ' `~Yj Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ~r--3 RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Amount From 2000-2001 Original Budget $100,000.00 July 25, 2000 Contribution to D-Day Memorial (10,000.00) Sept 12,2000 Video distribution for Senior and Challenged Citizens Commission (1,000.00) Sept 12,2000 Project Impact (12,800.00) Jan 9, 2001 VML/VACO Assessment, AEP Negotiations (4,183.00) Feb 27, 2001 Purchase of Automated External Defribillators (60,000.00) Feb 27, 2001 Agreement with SMPAC to provide information to SCC (5,000.00) Balance at March 13, 2001 $7,017.00 Respectfully Submitted, Danial Morris Director of Finance App By, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator m-y FUTURE SCHOOL CAPITAL RESERVE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Savings from 1996-1997 debt budget $670,000.00 Transfer from County Capital Projects Fund 1,113,043.00 FY 1997-1998 Original budget appropriation 2,000,000.00 June 23, 1998 Savings from 1997-1998 debt fund 321,772.00 FY 1998-1999 Original budget appropriation 2,000,000.00 FY1999-2000 Original budget appropriation 2,000,000 Less increase in debt service (1,219,855) 780,145.00 November 9, 1999 Savings from 1998-1999 debt fund 495,363.00 FY2000-2001 Original budget appropriation 2,000,000 Less increase in debt service (1,801,579) 198,421.00 Balance at March 13, 2001 $7,578,744.00 Reserved for Future School Operations FY2000-2001 Original budget appropriation July 11, 2000 SW Co Regional Stormwater Balance at March 13, 2001 $1,500,000.00 (290,000.00) 1,210,000.00 * Of this amount $736,680 is currently being used for the lease purchase of refuse vehicles and will be repaid within two years. Respectfully Submitted, Danial Morris Director of Finance App y' f~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator . - J~'~ vises Item No. ~'" ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA MEETING DATE: March 13, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: Report on Plan to Address Board and Citizen Concerns about Solid Waste Container Issues COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: At the February 27 meeting, Chairman Minnix requested information on plans to address citizen concerns about placement of garbage containers after collection. In particular, containers that tip over after being emptied can become a hazard and block traffic on County streets, while containers left at the curb on a daily basis create an eyesore. Citizens have also expressed concerns about trash falling out of the cans and flying out of the trucks, particularly on the interstate highways. To address these concerns, staff plans the following actions: o Appeal to citizens through public service announcements, a solid waste brochure, and Roanoke County Today, to bag their trash before placing it in the containers, to remove containers from the curb as soon as possible after collection, and to pick up neighbors' containers if they are in or near the street. o Implement program asking County staff which regularly drives through neighborhoods to pick up cans which have been knocked over and are in or near the street. o The new garbage trucks hold more than the older ones, so there is less travel time to the transfer station, allowing the drivers more time to place the containers back on the curb. Slowing the arm should help keep the containers upright. The new trucks were also purchased with hopper covers which prevent trash from flying out of the vehicle while en route to the transfer station. Drivers who encounter full cans which have been tipped over are instructed to stop the truck, right the containers, and then empty them. They also clean up around the containers as much as possible, which works best if the trash is bagged. Nl~ 5 The automated garbage trucks are very efficient, and have saved the County time, money and injuries over the past sixteen years. Many communities, including the City of Roanoke, have changed to this collection system in the recent past for these reasons. However, issues still arise occasionally, and need to be addressed through the communications methods outlined above. Respectfully submitted, Anne Marie Green Elmer C. Hodge Director of General Services County Administrator ACTION Approved ()Motion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to cc: Nancy Duval, Solid Waste Manager No Yes Abs Church Johnson McNamara _ Minnix _ _ Nickens 2 • .' - ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ©~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 13, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: Work Session to present the Fire and Rescue staffing plan and review call statistics COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: The previously approved 20 personnel will graduate from recruit school on March 16, 2001 and be ready to begin station assignments on April 2, 2001. At this work session, we will present the staffing plan and the statistics that support our decisions. This will involve the analysis of calls since December 11, 2000 when the new dispatch procedure took effect. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This presentation will give an overview of the placement of new and existing personnel and system enhancements. I am comfortable with the recommendations that will be presented. They have been developed by a committee of the Fire and Rescue chiefs working with Chief Burch and the staff, and are supported by the Rescue Chiefs Boards. We anticipate that there will be a lot of interest from all the communities affected and expect as many as 300 people to attend the meeting. The report has not yet been finalized, and I have asked Chief Burch to meet with each of you on Monday to explain the recommendations and answer any questions you may have. ~~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ;. C~- i Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: VOTE No. Yes Abs Church Johnson .McNamara Minnix Nickens cc: File ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER O-°~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 13, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: Joint Budget Work Session with the School Board and School Administration COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: This is a preliminary work session with the School Board. With the present unknown of the State budget, it is too early to determine the County allocation to the Schools. We are scheduling a meeting later in the week with the Chairman of both Boards and the administration to meet and work out the details of the budget. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This time has been set aside for a joint budget work session with the School Board and the School administration. The School Board will be reviewing a preliminary school budget at their Board meeting on March 8, 2001. In addition, they will be reviewing preliminary start-up budgets for the new Hidden Valley High School and the Glenvar Middle renovations. Materials will be summarized from that meeting and handed out at this joint work session. With the present uncertainty in the State budget, the Schools will be preparing their budget based upon Governor Gilmore's budget, as we have been advised to do by VML and VACO. Respectfully Submitted by Approved by: ~~~ . ~ ~~ Ca.~ Diane D. Hyatt Elmer C. Hodge Chief Financial Officer County Administrator ACTION VOTE No. Yes Abs Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Motion by: Church Johnson McNamara Minnix Nickens Roanoke County Schools Budget Summary FY01-02 Joint Work Session March 13, 2001 REVENUE State Basic Aid/Categorical Funds State Sales Tax Federal Funds County Appropriation -PRELIMINARY County Dental Insurance Appropriation Other Funds Total Operating Revenue EXPENDITURES Salaries & Related Costs: ~. _~ Instructional Personnel - 5.5% reduced t r5% Administrative Personnel - 5.5% reduced 1~~5°/ Classified Personnel ~6% Supplement increase tied to teacher scale --~Personne Initiative~s* or 2001-02 _,, ~_ `? >Health insura cn e benefit (est. 20%) ~ ' Dental insurance benefit (est. 10%) Substitute teachers Part-time/overtime -Classified Open-end contracts Termination pay Early Retirement Program -reduced payouts Reduction in VRS rate to 9.92% (Gilmore) Total Salary Expenditures Non-Salary Expenditures Total Expenditures Unfunded Operating Budget Budget . Budget Increase 2000-01 2001-02 (Decrease) 35,382,112 34,953,059 (429,053) 9,613,202 10,065,046 451,844 118,405 118,405 0 48,950,492 48,950,492 0 347,299 382,299 35,000 865,989 654,875 (211,114} 95,277,499 95,124,176 (153,323) 54,161,238 57,362,238 3,201,000 6,262,401 6,597,901 335,500 11,352,196 12,030,196 678,000 0 33,250 33,250 71,775,835 76,023,585 4,247,750 _ 0 3.087.702 _ 3,087,702_ 4,476,111 5,371,333 895,222 347,299 382,299 35,000 590,000 590,000 0 128,892 128,892 0 225,000 250,000 25,000 688,378 805,378 117,000 2,851,919 2,254,919 (597,000) 0 (1,500,000) (1,500,000) 81,083,434 87,394,108 6,310,674 14,194,065 15,444,042 1,249,977 95,277,499 102,838,150 7,560,651 0 (7,713,974) (7,713,974) ~,~ ~ - ~ ~ o-a 03/12/2001 Recommended Increases (429,053) 451, 844 0 0 35,000 (211,114) (153,323) 2,910,000 305,000 678,000 30,227 3,923,227 ___.____„ _1,213,062 895,222 35,000 0 0 25,000 117,000 (597,000) (1, X00,000) 4,111,511 666,910 4,778,421 (4,931,744) b udget2002\bos-req. xis Personnel Priorities for 2001-02 Joint Budget Work Session March 13, 2001 Staff Priority Recommendation #1 Salary Increases for All Employees: Teaching Personnel ($582,000 per 1 %) ---- 5% average 2,910,000 Administrative Personnel ($61,000 per 1%) ---- 5% average 305,000 Classified Personnel ($113,000 per 1 %) ---- 6% average 678,000 Increase supplements (tied to teachers scale) and fica 30,227 Sub-total for Salary Increases 3,923,227 #2 Increase in Trigon health insurance renewal (incl in non-salary budget) #3 Reduce K-1 ratios to 20:1 400,000 #4 Reduction in Carillon school nurse grant funding 10,000 #5 Special education teachers (5.5) 220,000 #6 Nurses (7} 220,000 #7 Technology resource assistants (4) -partially funded w/ $59,000 state 101,000 #8 Alternative School (regional program) 164,307 #9 Distance learning instructional assistant - NSH 16,598 #9 Distance learning instructional assistant - WBHS 16,598 #9 Distance learning instructional assistant - CSHS 16,598 #10 New guidance coordinator at Glenvar Middle 5,000 #11 Special education bus drivers (1) 10,080 #12 New universal tradesman 32,881 Sub-total for New Personnel Requests 1,213,062 Personnel Priorities for 2001-02 5,136,289 03/12/2001 _ Personnel Requests for 2001-02 Joint Budget Work Session __ ___ -_ March 13, 2001 f Requests Staff Rec Priority Salary Increases for All Employees: _ Teaching Personnel ($582,000 per 1 %) - 5.5% average -___ _ 3_,201,000_ --_ _2,910,000 Administrative Personnel ($61,000 per 1%) - 5.5% average ~ _ 335,500 305,000 Classified Personnel ($113,000 per 1 %) - 6% average _ ~ _ _6.78,000. 678,000 Increase supplements by 5.5% (tied to teachers scale) and fica ~ 33,250 30,227 Sub-total for Salary Increases 4,247,750 3,923,227 #1 Other Benefits. _._ Increase in Trigon health insurance renewal (in non-salary budget) ~ - - #2 _ _ Increase in bonuses (new teachers, bus drivers, cust, nat'I teacher) ', 5,000 - Incentive pay (awards, added endorsements in hard to fill areas) 20,000 - Increase substitute pay to $75 per day (funded w/in current budget) - - Add 3 paid holidays for instructional assistants/bus drivers 71,364 ' - Provide free fmgerpnnting for new classified employees 12,000 Additional Personnel Requests: _ Reduce K-3 ratios to 20:1 ! 800,000 ~ 400,000 #3 Move Asst Prin/Reading Specialists for 20:1 ratios in grades 4-5 _ - .New gifted position (1 teacher) _ _ 40,000 ' - 'Extend contracts for ARBTC personnel ; 4,324 ' - Extend teacher contract by one hour per day at Bent Mountain '~ 5,000 ! - New Programs: ~ __ _ _ Pilot learning acceleration program at GV & Mt Pleas (2 teachers) _ 80,000 40,000 _ Add 11th grade at RCCC (1.5 positions) 65_,000 _ '_ 65,000 Regional Alternative School at RE Cook (shared with Bedford} _ 164,307 164,307 ' #8 4 technology resource assistants (partially funded w/ $59,000 state) - _ .---- -- -- ---- ------ __ -- j 101,000 i - --------- 101,000 - #7 Cave Spring High Specialty Center (1 art teacher) _ _ ~__ T ~ 40,000 I _ 40,000 _ _ Provide elementary art teachers with planning period 40,000 ------ 20,000 ' Strings program (2 classes) r 12,000 ; 12,000 Distance learning instructional assistant - NSH ; 16,598 ' 16,598 ~ #9 Distance learning instructional assistant - WBHS ~ 16,598. 16,598 #9 .Distance learning instructional assistant - CSHS__ _ _ _ _ _ ___ 16,598 ~ 16,598 #9 Distance learning instructional assistant - GHS ! 16,598 - Grant Reductions: Reduction in Carillon school nurse grant funding 10,000 10,000 #4 ARBTC School to Work technicians -replace funding 32,000 ', - _ Health Services: ' _ Additional school nurses (7 positions) ' 221,000 220,000 #6 ,Special Education: _ ___ Special education teacherT 500,000: 220,000 #5 _. _ .p - --- - - ~~ -- ----- ---_.. - - ------_ S ecial education bus drivers 3 30,240 10,080 #11 High school special education coordinators (4) 160,000 160,000 -- - - _ _ r- ---- - I~ High school transition specialists (4 specialists)____ 160,000 40,000 budget20021salaries.xls 03/12/2001 Personnel Requests for 2001-02 Joint Budget Work Session _ _ _ - March 13, 2001 Requests Staff Rec Priority Guidance/Safety: ___----_.___ _ _ Elementary part-time SAP counselors - _ _ _ _ ~ 21,050 _ - Extra guidance in needy elementary schools (3 part-time) _ 60,000 _ __ - _ New guidance coordinator at Glenvar Middle 5 ,000 ~ 5,000 #10 Increase secondary guidance. from 10.5 to 11 month contracts... _ 60,000 rt__ - .Media Services: Upgrade Information Systems instructional assistant to specialist 9,170 ', - Upgrade Information Systems. Network Specialist Asst Manager 10,400 - .Upgrade Information Systems Manager _ __ ..- __ ---- ------ -- -- - 9,170 - - -- --- - _. , _ y _ - - New information s stems com uter s ecialist P P 41,460 41,460 Maintenance/WarehouselTransportation: _____ __ ------- _---- - _ __ - - _ - - --- T-- __ _ - --._ __ ___ - _-- _ 2 Full-time Substitute Custodians _ 41,982 ; - New telephone & radio tradesman T 32,881 ; 32,881 New universal tradesman 32,881 32,881 #12 Increase classified hourly/substitute rate by 6% 25,200 I 25,200 Additional bus aide (1) I 9,833 ~ 9,833 ___ ,Bus driver perfect attendance award_($100_each) ___ ____ _`_ 2,000 j - Bus driver safety award ($100 each) _ _ i, _ 13,000 ~ - _ __ Instructional Assistants: _ ____ _ ___ ' New instructional assistant for HVJH 16,598 I 16,598 'New instructional assistant for Mountain View 16,598 j - Secretaries: -- ---- -- __ _ . _ _ - -- _-_- ----- ------- :New guidance secretary for Glenvar Middle ~ T 19,127 j -- - ---- - 19,127 -- - - -- - --- -------- -- ---- -- _ -- -- _ Upgrade Career & Technical secretary __ ___ r - 925 925 'Upgrade Information Systems secretary to specialist 10,400 ; j 10,400 ____ Upgrade Health Services secretary to specialist.-____ _ - _. _ _ _ ___10,400 ' - Sub-total for additional personnel requests .3,087,702 '~, 1,746,486 GRAND TOTAL PERSONNEL INITIATIVES ! 7,335,452 ~ 5,669,713 budget2002\salaries.xls 03/12/2001 2 Hidden Valley High School Detail Budget Projection Attachment A Start-Up Costs Operating Costs 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 Not Open Not Open 1st Year Not Open 1st Year 2nd Year New Personnel Administrators 0 0 0 146,000 176,850 176,850 Secretaries 0 0 0 18,000 84,500 84,500 Athletics 0 0 0 25,000 94,000 94,000 Guidance 0 0 0 35,000 178,000 213,000 Custodial 0 0 0 0 140,000 140,000 Nurses 0 0 0 0 30,000 30,000 Student Assistance 0 0 0 0 35,000 35,000 Library 0 0 0 0 91,800 91,800 Instructional Assistants 0 0 0 0 55,000 75,000 English 0 0 0 0 27,000 62,000 Social Studies 0 0 0 0 35,000 35,000 Math 0 0 0 0 35,000 35,000 Science 0 0 0 0 35,000 55,000 Foreign Languages 0 0 0 0 35,000 35,000 Business 0 0 0 0 35,000 35,000 Work & Family Studies 0 0 0 0 27,000 47,000 Technology Education 0 0 0 0 27,000 27,000 Band/Chorus 0 0 0 0 35,000 35,000 Art 0 0 0 0 35,000 35,000 Marketing 0 0 0 0 35,000 35,000 Special Education 0 0 0 0 250,000 350,000 Supplements (coach, dept chairs) 0 0 0 0 92,000 92,000 0 0 0 224,000 1,588,150 1,818,150 Athletics Uniforms Equipment Allotment (1st year) Transportation (1st year) Band/Choir Instruments Uniforms Allotment Custodial Services Supplies/Year Trash Removal Warehouse/Custodial Equipment 0 105,340 0 0 0 0 0 175,373 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20,000 0 0 0 0 0 3,000 0 0 280,713 0 0 23,000 0 0 0 164,295 0 0 0 0 25,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,468 3,468 25,000 164,295 0 0 3,468 0 0 0 0 0 17,000 17,000 0 5,135 5,135 0 18,350 18,350 0 40,485 40,485 Food Services Inservice/Training 0 0 5,547 0 0 0 Guidance Office Equipment/Materials 0 35,380 0 0 0 0 Instructional Materials English 0 17,545 9,950 890 950 950 Math 0 33,794 13,410 500 850 850 Social Studies 0 27,988 10,200 0 1,000 1,000 Science 0 498,298 82,800 23,580 17,200 17,200 03/12/2001 HVHS\Budget.xls Start-Up Costs Operating Costs 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 Not Open Not Open 1st Year Not Open 1st Year 2nd Year Textbooks 0 25,000 0 0 0 0 Art 0 44,989 0 10,264 3,000 3,000 Health & PE 0 71,746 0 0 1,114 1,114 Driver Education 0 13,000 0 0 1,156 1,156 Technology Education 0 174,016 147 1,525 1,379 1,379 Work & Family Studies 0 28,047 108 669 561 561 Foreign Languages 0 17,550 540 0 1,540 1,540 Business 0 0 1,075 3,888 2,763 2,763 Marketing 0 0 438 0 1,581 1,581 Special Education 0 10,100 2,100 0 0 0 0 962,073 120,768 41,316 33,094 33,094 Maintenance Contracted Repairs 0 0 0 0 17,100 17,100 Fixed Contracted Repairs 0 0 0 0 19,500 19,500 Materials 0 0 0 0 21,400 21,400 Minor Maintenance 0 0 0 0 4,800 4,800 Lawn Mower 0 0 0 0 684 684 PA 0 0 0 0 684 684 Communications 0 0 0 0 1,100 1,100 Roofing 0 0 0 0 50,000 50,000 0 0 0 0 115,268 115,268 Principal's Office Administrative Expenses 0 4,050 0 0 0 0 Inservice 0 0 6,500 0 0 0 0 4,050 6,500 0 0 0 Technology Software 0 39,250 0 0 0 0 Art/Music Software/Sound 0 38,155 0 0 0 0 Science Materials 0 26,743 0 0 0 0 Library Supplies 0 2,500 0 0 0 0 0 106,648 0 0 0 0 Transportation Personnel - 3 drivers 0 0 0 0 36,000 36,000 Fuel 0 0 0 0 8,000 8,000 Parts 0 0 0 0 7,000 7,000 0 0 0 0 51,000 51,000 Utilities Water 0 0 0 0 8,200 8,200 Sewer 0 0 0 0 3,000 3,000 Electric 0 0 0 0 106,000 106,000 Telephone 0 0 0 0 4,000 4,000 Property Insurance 0 0 0 0 8,200 8,200 0 0 0 0 129,400 129,400 Estimated Budgets 25,000 1,553,159 132,815 265,316 1,983,865 2,187,397 Funded by School Bd. NOTE: Grades 9-11 will attend HVHS in 2002-03. Beginning in 2 003-04, grad es 9-12 will attend HVHS and personnel costs will i ncrease approximately $230,000. Approximately 50 positions are i ncluded for FY2002-03 and an additional 7 positions for FY2003-04. 03/12/2001 HVHS\Budget.xls Glenvar Middle Addition Detail Budget Projection 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 Start-Up 1st Year 2nd Year New Personnel Teachers Custodian Librarian Instructional Supplies & Materials Science Foreign Language Art Custodial Services Supplies/Year Trash Removal Warehouse/Custodial Equipment Maintenance Contracted Services Building & Maintenance Supplies Contracted Repairs Utilities Gas Electric Property Insurance Estimated Budgets Attachment B 0 0 0 0 15,000 15,000 0 50,000 50,000 0 65,000 65,000 30,687 0 0 1,000 0 0 32,973 0 0 64,660 0 0 0 6,000 6,000 0 1,000 1,000 0 1,000 1,000 0 8,000 8,000 0 10,294 10,294 0 11,304 11,304 0 9,029 9,029 0 30,627 30,627 0 12,000 12,000 0 20,000 20,000 0 2,600 2,600 0 34,600 34,600 64,660 138,227 138,227 The Glenvar Middle School addition is scheduled to be completed for the FY2002-03 school opening in August 2002. This budget reflects additional budget needs for this school when it opens. 03/12/2001 HVHS\gms.xls w ACTION NO. ITEM NO. 6 '' 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 13, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: Work session to develop guidelines for zoning approvals of private and commercial stables. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Background: The threat of erosion and runoff, animal waste, adequate amount of usable acreage for the number of permitted horses, concerns about impacts on neighbors and location of the private and commercial stables have been a concern of the County in the past. The recent applications for special use permits for a private and a commercial stable have focused the Board of Supervisors' attention to this situation. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: At the February 27, 2001 Board meeting, Supervisor Church requested, a work session on this topic. The goal is to develop guidelines to assist the Board in considering or imposing conditions a part of a special use permit, or to consider amendments to the County zoning ordinance to address these concerns. County staff has prepared a presentation for this work session. This presentation will include the attached information: § 30-81-5 and §30-81-6 of Roanoke County Code §2-501.2 of the Montgomery Zoning Ordinance Roanoke Valley Horsemen's Association Position Statement Staff will present maps showing the allowable location of commercial and private stables and the location of known commercial stables in Roanoke County. G:\BOARD\2001\March0l\3-13stables-ws.doc 1 V 3 Respectfully submitted, ~~ ~ dom. t~ul..~ Dana K. Lazzuri County Attorney Intern Action Vote No Yes Abs Approved () Motion by Church Denied () Johnson Received () McNamara Referred Minnix to Nickens G:\BOARD\2001\March0l\3-13stables-ws.doc 2 r -• Sec. 30-81-5. Stables, Private. (A) Private stables in AR, AV, and R-1 districts shall comply with the following requirements: ~-- 1. Minimum lot size: Two (2) acres. 2. On lots of less than five (5) acres, no more than one stable animal per acre shall be permitted. 3. Stables and corrals shall comply with all the setback requirements for accessory buildings. 4. Stables shall properly manage animal waste so as to not create a nuisance or health hazard to adjoining or nearby property owners. Sec. 30-81-6. Stable, Commercial. (A) General standards: 1. Minimum lot size: Five (5) acres. 2. Minimum setback for stables and riding arenas: Fifty (50) feet from all property lines. 3. Accessory tack shops not exceeding one thousand (1,000) square feet are permitted in conjunction with commercial stables. 4. Commercial stables shall prepare and follow a management plan for responsible and environmentally safe management of all animal wastes. Such plan shall be approved, when required by the Virginia. Department of Environmental, Quality, Division of Water. Animal waste shall not create a nuisance or health hazard to adjoining property owners. (Ord. No. 42694-12, § 11, 4-26-94) Sec. 30-81-7. Wayside Stands. (A) General standards: 1. Front yard setback; Thirty-five (35) feet from any public right-of--way. 2. At least fifty (50) percent of the goods and/or merchandise shall be produced on the site of the stand, on adjoining contiguous property or on other properties owned or leased by the owner of the site on which the wayside stand is located. 3. Entrances and exits to roads shall be clearly delineated, shall be so located as to provide safe ingress and egress from roads, and shall be approved by the Virginia Department of Transportation. SEC. 30.8. RESIDENTIAL USES. Sec. 30.82-1. Accessory Apartments. (A) Intent. Accessory apartments afford an opportunity for the development of small rental units designed to meet the special housing needs of single persons, persons with fixed or limited income, and relatives of families who live or desire to live in the county. Accessory apartments provide a degree of flexibility for home owners with changing economic conditions and/or family structure, while providing a reasonable degree of protection for existing property values. In addition, these provisions are provided to formally recognize previously established apartments and provide for improved safety and physical appear- ance. Supp. No. 5 1860.20 Montgomery Zoning Ordinance Section S00 R-2 Residential Article 1'I- 24 :. ~ ._. ~ 3 2-546. Building Requirements post-It' fax note ~s» aarc a~+~ ~~ HL ~~ N From ,off. 3ar„ I . Minimum. Yards co.roept. ~~ r+1O"~ ~ Phone M ~"' A. Frpnt~ rorty (40} feet (Al: Fa, ~ 7 x v 9 F$Y « ~ intensive agriculture opera 6 5 -• ~'~ 0 B. Side. Fifteen (15} feet for each principal structure. C. Rear. Forty (40). D. rlccessvry 1uildings. Ten {lt?) feet to any side or rear lot line. 2. Maximum Building Height Buildings may be erected up to thirty-five (35) feet in height from grade, except that: A. The height limit for dwellings may be increased up to ten {10) feet, provided that there, is one additional (1) foot or more of side yard in each side yard for each additional foot of building height over thirty-five (35} feet. B. A public or semipublic building such as a school, church, library or hospital may be erected to a height of sixty (GO} feet from grade, provided that required front, side and rear yards shall be increased one (l) foot for each foot in height over thirty-five (35j feet. E:. No acccssor~~ buiklinb which is within ten (lU) li;ct of any party lot iinc shall be more than one (l) story high. All accessory buildings shall be less than the main building in height. z-S07 Use Limitations 1. Public Water and Wastewater Service ~'ublie water and wastewatc;r sc*.rviccs arc rcyuirccl for all development in any K-2 District established after the date of adoption of this ordinance. Z. Keeping and raising horses and ponies A. Horses and ponies may only be kept. for personal enjoyment mid not for commercial purposes; B. A minimum of five {S) acres of opei3 or forestal land is available for the horses and ponies; and C. No more than two {2) horses and ponies collectively (being one (l) horse and one (1) pony, two (2) horses, or two (2} ponies) shall be permitted per each five (5) acres with a maxitnum of four {4} horses and ponies collectively for parcels of land often (10} acres or more. 0"3 ~toanoke Valley Horsemen's Association Position Statement ~tegar~ding Acreage Requirement for the Stabling of Horses The Roanoke Valley Horsemen's Association is comprised of appraximately 400 members who share a common interest in horses. Our membership consists of individual "backyard" horse owners who may only have one or two horses, trainers who train horses for others, instructors who provide riding lessons for children and adults and commercial stables who make their living boarding, training, breeding, instructing, showing and selling horses. All breeds and disciplines are represented in our association. Annually, we produce the Roanoke Valley Horse Show, which has become one of the premier horse shows in the country each June. We host over 1000 top quality horses from all over the world, with over 3000 trainers, exhibitors, and more than 26,000 spectators. This translates to an economic impact of over $13,000,000 to the Roanoke Valley. The Virginia Equine .Educational Foundation conducted a state wide economic impact study in 1996. Some of the key findings of that study: • The Virginia equine industry contributes over $1.0 billion in sales annually to Virginia businesses and individuals. • There are some 225,000 horses in Virginia and 2.65 per cent of all Virginia household's own horses. Support of these horses creates jobs for nearly 25,000 Virginians. • Virginians spend $2,800 per horse per year. Taken collectively among the many different trades, services, and professions, this translates into $680.5 million in direct expenditures in support of horses. With the above facts and figures in mind, it is easy to see that horses are big business in Virginia and, indeed, the Roanoke Valley. As with any industry, most participants are ethical and aim to conduct their affairs in a dignified manner and are respectful of their neighbors. However, as is true in most other industries, we do have our "bad actors". And, as occurs in other industries, this makes for bad publicity for all of us involved with horses. V~~ Page 2 RVHA Position Statement on Acreage Requirements for Horses The most common complaint has to do with horse manure disposal. When not properly handled, it can be a nuisance for the neighborhood, a health hazard for the horses and potentially a water quality issue. There are many ways to properly and effectively dispose of horse manure. The individual type of horse operation will dictate which method is the most effective and prudent for that operation. Among the most Gammon methods of manure disposal are spreading on farm acreage with a manure spreader and composting. Acreage used for horse grazing should be periodically dragged to break up piles of manure. The frequency depends on the number of horses and the acreage available. Horses are generally maintained in one of three methods- pastured, dry lot, and stabled. Horses on pasture are allowed to roam freely within their fenced enclosures and graze at will. The pastures need to be mowed or bush hogged periodically to keep weeds down as horses will selectively graze the pasture. Horses primarily stabled will be kept in stalls most of the time. This requires daily removal of manure from the stalls. With a large number of horses, such as is often found at commercial stables, the manure may be loaded directly from stall to a manure spreader. When full, the spreader will be pulled by tractor to nearby farm land for direct spreading over a large area. When dried by the sun, the manure will have no odor and will become fertilizer for the land. For dry lot turn outs and smaller stables, manure is usually collected in wheelbarrows and disposed-of in a compost pile. This causes the organic material to "heat", which results in decomposition of the manure and forms a very rich compost sought after by many organic gardeners. Imposing an acreage requirement for horse stables will not solve the problems of poor horse-keeping practices followed by a relatively few number of individuals. Quite to the Q-3 Page 3 RVHA Position Statement on Acreage Regu.i~ements for Horses contrary, such an imposition would cause hardship on an enormous number of owners who .are following acceptable practices. Many "show barns" have horses that are kept stalled all the time except for their daily training or exercise turnout. There may be 50 horses in a stable with five acres and absolutely no manure management issues. Conversely, one or two horses in a poorly drained turnout lot may have a tremendous manure management problem due to lack of attention by the owner or just plain lack of knowledge in horse keeping skills. We, as an association, would encourage that no new county ordinances regulating the number of acres required for horse-keeping be enacted at this time. We feel that existing regulations are sufficient for the vast majority of law abiding horse owners and stable operations. For those not currently in coarpliance with existing ordinances, it is doubtful that any new regulations would be adhered to. For those with chronic problems with manure management that has or may result in water pollution, the Agricultural Stewardship Act of 1997, administered by the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, provides enforcement officials that attempt to resolve problems with the agricultural operation through education, monitoring and legal means when necessary. It may take a while but they are effective. Most complaints filed are resolved on a voluntary basis. Only a few end up in litigation. The RVHA is committed to working with Roanoke County officials to reduce problems with area horse keeping operations. Toward this end, we will conduct an educational program to provide guidance to our members on proper manure disposal methods and other aspects of operating a "neighbor friendly" horse operation. Page 4 RVHA Position Statement on Acreage Requirements for Horses For additional information, the following members of the Roanoke Valley Horsemen's Association may be contacted: Nancy Troutman, President 384-6909 Carol Whiteside, Vice President 774-2143 Chris Lee, Corresponding Secretary 384-6930 Ron Smith, Board Member 384-6272 ~` Lowell Gobble, Board Member $90-0656 V ~L ~ .~ ~ ~~ ^~ O N ~ ~- _ ~ ~ ~v ~ ~ O ~ a~ 0 v r NNI l.J~. ~n V J VJ Q ~ 0~ r- c~ Q c~ a. M Q ~ ~ . .«+ as .Q ~ L ~ m ' a cn v cn L ~L t V r~ -~--~ .~ -~ N nI' i..~... ca ~U N a CU ~.. rI I V / -~ t Sec. 30-81-5 Stables, Private (A) Private stables in AR, AV, and R-1 districts shall comply with the following requirements: 1. Minimum lot size: 2 acres. 2. On lots of less than five acres, no more than one stable animal per acre shall be permitted. 3. Stables and corrals shall comply with all the setback requirements for accessory buildings. 4. Stables shall properly manage animal waste so as to not create a nuisance or health hazard to adjoining or nearby property owners. Sec. 30-81-6 Stable, Commercial (A) General standards: 1. Minimum lot size: 5 acres. 2. Minimum setback for stables and riding arenas: 50 feet from all property lines. 3. Accessory tack shops not exceeding 1,000 square feet are permitted in conjunction with commercial stables. 4. Commercial stables shall prepare and follow a management plan for responsible and environmentally safe management of all animal wastes. Such plan shall be approved, when required, by the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Water. Animal waste shall not create a nuisance or health hazard to adjoining property owners. (Amended Ord. 42694-12) ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER D AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 13, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: Work Session to Review Roanoke County's Street Light Policy. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: County staff has been requested to review the current policy regarding the installation of street lights in Roanoke County. At the work session, staff plans to review with the Board of Supervisors the history of the street light process, the current evaluation process, appeals process, various costs associated with street light installation and budget. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: At this time, staff is not recommending any changes to the current policy. If changes are requested, staff will submit them to the Board of Supervisors for approval, at a later date SUBMITTED BY: ~... . '~ ~~ , ~. ~~ Arnold Covey, Director Department of Community Deve opment APPROVED BY: ~/1c..c.L ~. Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ~~ Approved Denied Received Referred To ACTION ()Motion by: O VOTE No Yes Abs Church Johnson McNamara Minnix Nickens 2 AGENDA ITEM NO. ~-' ~~~ ~~~ j APPEARANCE REQUEST WS PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: (~i~T ~~J/~ ~ - f-=~ /fit ~l ~~~~-~ ~I~'~`=f`l/l/y I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual fo represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD ~, . , ~ .> q,. -.I~Ilnl~~ ~~~~LlS ~'ya ~ Pa~GK~u~ ,Dr~~2 1~r S~ ` s C0,3 AGENDA ITEM NO. APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING -ORDINANCE ~CITI2EN COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~~~5 I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~'1jc~~~~% ~-~T, ~~~~ ADDRESS: ~.~c~o,S l',~Il~~/ ~S-~i~--~~./~-~ p.~ ' PHONE: ~~ ~~-~d aj~ AGENDA ITEM NO. APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING SUBJECT: I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE G[1/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW.' ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group sha!! file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. ORDINANCE J/' CITIZEN COMMENTS PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: Ci ci ~~ ADDRESS: ~C PHONE: ~~ 7 - //~~ Save Your Rescue Squad and Save Lives Just recently the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors approved the the hiring of 20 new EMS personnel. The proposal to be presented to the Board this month will recommend that NONE of the new EMS personnel be assigned to the Mt. Pleasant squad and that the only full time EMS person that we now have will be assigned to another squad. Any day time rescue calls will be forwarded to either Clear Brook or Vinton Rescue or to a Roanoke City Rescue if Roanoke agrees. As you know Roanoke City charges for thier rescue calls and would bill the County for any that they answer. The extra time that it will take to respond to the Mt. Plesant area could mean the difference between life and death in certain circumstances. We the citizens of Mt. Pleasant are equal Taz payers with the rest of the County and should not be cast aside when it comes to appropriately staffing our Rescue Squad.The families of Mt. Pleasant can no longer be handed the left overs and be asked to accept it and be thankful for what little we got. By signing this petition to be presented to the Board of Supervisors we are asking that they dont approve any recommendation on the new EMS personnel placement that doesnt include the placement of 4 of the new EMS at the Mt. Pleasant squad and the keeping of our 1 current EMS there. With our large elementary school and our many senior citizens in this area we can settle for nothing less than our own fully staffed rescue squad.We all must stand together on this most important issue and use our strength in numbers to gain what we should so rightfully have.Please everyone call our own supervisor Dr. Harry Nickens and all the other members of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors and let them know our feelings and we wont stand for unequal treatment. ~+1 ~/ ~ i 1 Name Address Phone No. (Optional) ~/4 <~Z.7-/~/~ ~ r ~ -, ` ~ ~ t t ,: ~ ~ f= r ~. h ~;~~ ~ ~~~~~~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ m ~ P~ ~~as ~~ t ~~.~ ~ ~~~: u ~z~ - ~ ~ s ~~ ---~ ,• f , ,} ~ ~ ._~ _ , ~ rj ~ f~r~~ ~ , ~ ~ , ,~ s ;, ,/ ~ y l ;~ ~~ /I 7- ~/ ~- ~% ~ ` : ~ ~~ `7~C ~> ~~ ~ ~ °• Y .5 ~ ~~ ~L AIL ~ /l /~ _`J L~ ~v~ ~ _ ~~~ ?'c% .~- ,c ~) ~ i / ~~ i. ~ D , 1~ f~~ ~ ~ .Z ~l 7 ~ ~J ~ EZ ~,'~.~,~~ ~~ ~' ~ Z 7 _G~C ,,. _.--~ ~'~~ ~ ; t_ .3U(~ "7 r~~Ns~u. ~~ r~ ~;~~~~~CL~?S J~ II ~.~i `' Name Address Phone No. (Optional) ~~f rr ~~-~S~ .) r 2 L,c~ i,,- y cv~-,b~ ~?;' `1 2 7 - I? sS. v /\ \.._ ~ ` / 1/ e,.,/ '`~C/ `/~,~ ~~L1 ~~ (~-V ~~_~ / f r ,c ~~ ~~ { Cam/ " `/,. ~" ~ ~- -1 J~~'~'-".~-~'sJ TY ~~~~ ~f ~ ~~~ ~Li`ri .~/1 3 ,^ ~ ~~ [~ ~ '" J ~ Z (, In / ~ ~ 1 F~ _' i ~C'r-''!(~~`T! u,~- `f'~~'t~e1~ ~ ~ ~~ j ~ Y~lG~ ~,~ f~ '~1 ~~~71 <~i ~~ G~ y(~C.`~ r"2ti`~« ~~ 2 ~ C' ~~~ C- f~~n~~-~n `11,5 ~u,-r- ct~~ I~~-1Y ~ ~/o~y ~-/~.7 /8%/ n ~~~-r~~ I~.~ P-~.~c r_ `~(:i C; E~ ~,S~i r,~.. ~~~ ~lc~: ~ ~ ya~~i ~~ 7-c;~~~^ G~ P ~~-C~Z~ly ~ ~, ~-l ~ f `f -; :~ Name Address Phone No. (Optional) /J L_ ~~' „ ~c , ~~`~ %~~.~ ~-~; ~ "~ ~~ ~ Vin; ~~j~,, r; ~~;~,` /~,~ ~- ~' ~ ~'~~~, lc~ ,, ~; ~f (' / ~ /~'/I ~ iL~'/~~l'~s ,~E ~ ~ f-~3Lr-~"~~°` l ~,/ / (~1 ~ ~ f~ ~ ~~/~^'' a J~ v tom. ~L"" ~~'~f ~~G`~ ~/ /- r~ 7 - ~~ ~ ~.' j --,~ ~ ,~ ~, ~, Z ~ ~ ~/ \ ~u~ ~, y J"~ _ l / + ~ ' i ~ L y Pmt/ r ~ , / ~~ y ~~C. ~ ^~ ~ /. ~,/ ~ _ f}~ > ~ . .~ ~,._, ~~c~~LZ N~;:m ,, -~~~- ~ ~~c~/~~ ~ ~c~ _ ~ y:~~- S ~I ~~ / ~ r ~, ~.~~ ~~t~7~N ~L ' , . ref ~ ,~~ 4 ~ ~C~t N"L, / ~ % ~" ~ {` J '~ 1 , ~/~/ ~ yL~L~ ~ ~z-L/ ~ -~~ 1 ~~ ~~xR' ~ ~~ ~ ~ L; ~~~~- i~L~ ~ ~~"~~ .~ , ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~f ~, v'~ a V~ ~ y _J:~ V t l.~ ~;~`1~ ' ~~ t l ~~ ~1..~~ ~~ ~~ 6~"~ ~~~~ ~ 1 ,~ r , ~ ~l~ l "_ l.~ _~, ` ~~ ~ Name Address Phone No. (Optional) ~~vn-~ l.Z~'( _v~, ~ ' .-~3 ~ ~~ ~l~.rrL ~ ,Lr~ ~~ ~~7~ ~a o 9 ~J/c Q~ o~ y Z`~ G ~t,-/x~ _ ~:~ ;3 ~;'7 m f ~ PI e r~5~ h~ L ycC - S E ~ Ll o l ~ ~~~~. ~.._ , ~ ~ h ~~1 / s ~, ~ - ~c.~o~, ~~~ fi'. /%/c?V.Q.a -~ o~ %C~ ~G(/L~~~y p~ ~,~~ ~GZGti~1-r-a''~ ~~ _ ~ au~~s ~ ~~-~,~ ~ ozy~,~ Z 5 5 ~ ~ ~ Pia Sc1,~ Q ~ c.Cf S K~ a n~/~C ~~ z y~ / y ~rn~ o rrl~~c~y~`, ~~~~ }~~,-any I~,q 2~~~/ ~n~,.-,,~,C.~,,,~ r c--l ~r ~-~ 3 ~ 1 tee. ll ~'..~ ~. ~~~~ l% , Zvo i y /V..~J ~~nd--tom ~ - ~j :~ v~r,-P~t 1~~. J ° ~ !~ ~-.~-,~. l/~ ~- U~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (-.-. ~ ~r u_1 ~~~ '1=Ia ,` U Name Address Phone No. (Optional) ,, << ~ , Name Address j~ Phone No. (Optl!i/oval) ~~t~ '~I."PI17.t~Pi~' ~7J/Ll ~1~I~~~iC~t~f/' l~C~ Kf~(-' .~~/%/y ~~ ~ TIi;L'~ Name Address Phone No. (Optioaa!) ~- _ /~r ~j F C / ~ ~h ~ i~ . ~. ;~~ ~~/i ~,~~~~ -~ / J (l r~ ,. _ ' / nM ~~~1 3 ~~~~ ~1 ..~~~~~ ~ y~ 7~ ~~; ~, . ~J l ~ ~'l,c.i_ I~ C = i _ ..f j < _~ C ti" .'C.i(_/~ •- =~ h? ~ J (~ (J, r.Yl. ? I/ i _ :~-~ f~ ft~ .i~~= _ .. / - ~ /' ~ ~ l b ~~r~~1 ~ r ~~ ~ / n ~~~ ~ ^~ ~-, ~-t~ 1 ~ 3 3 ~ ~ ~-1.7~~~~, ~~ ~ ~c~-~ ~~w ~, / / ~ ~~~ ~ 1 y, _ ;fit.. ~~ - ~ ~~ ~ ~,~~~r~'~~ ~/.~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ r~-C ~~'~~~ ~ - '~ ; ~ ~. ~ Lc,,.~~ ~~~~i r. ~ ~,~~ ~~\~ ~~ u 1 ~ 3~ . ' ~' ~ -~' ~' Ji//~~tt~'''~/~C~ . ~/.~ (ter ~/I L (~l!~~ ~~,~?~~ ~;~-7~~ C ~ ~ ~~ l .., . /~ ` s,,,~---~%..J I. ~,~ .~ _ '1 /~ n h4~ ~y~ /~'s f~~~ f~ C'/r ,3,`~~ / 1~i! S~1C~c,~~~' 1~~~ ~<~<<1, V,.~ ~~G%`~ Y,~~ SQL.-~ ~jf7 ~~. . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~J `~/ ~' Nam e Address Phone No. (Optional) /J e z . ~~ ~~ ~. /ti.y. . , o' '' ~ 1 "_7 ~ y ~~ ,, ' ~ ~~ ~ , ,~ - y~.~ ~: ~ , ~ U /(~ r h ~~ r~ ~'~ ~ '~ ~ l `~; ; 7 "~ ~ ~%~. ~-"!..mot , "~ ~ ~ ~ . - -. ~' I 2 ~--• ~ ~ 4~ - ~ _ ~ 7'-1 ~ __ ~ , J~ ~~ ~~~~ r rr 1~~~~'~ ~_ ~ ~~- ~~ i P~ c7-~ S~ L ~c~ r , ,~ ` l _ _, .:1J-~~ __ `'t" ~bi~ ~ ,UCH ~ \ ~ ~ 6 ~ ~ , ~/ , ~ /' ,+ ~, , , / r /~ I yJ - r~ / , , .%, ~ / ll'~' r1..^.~ ~ f ''-r% G ~ `1 L ~1.~-rte :~,~~ G~ ~ L,, ~ ~~/~ Z ~ ~ ~ ~ L= U~f}- t C~~~ ~~-~-~~Z'lL . ,~ ~ ~, ~ z _ `~~ Z4C~i L' _ ~ ~f ~ ~ Name Address Phone No. (Optional) C , L N ~ ~ i 3~`~ ~ Swt ~ e.~ ~u . ~~ . ~ a~ _ i \. ~~`~ l ~- <~~ yNc~ ~ ,uc~ ~G, / ~ ..tom ~A'L~ ~; - ~~'L ~- ~ ~~`7-S/~ ~ ~- ~I J ~ ~~. .~ a~ 3 ~~, f z~re ~d ~ 7 - 5_ ~ ~ r ~~~ ~ `~~ ~~ 3~~~- I~ ~~7- 3~9 ~ ~ ~-1~-. ~c~ ~ ~ ~/ I: /nJ/L7?fir ,/ ~ ~ ~~cL~ -~.---- l~ Name Address Phone rio. (Optional) `l r ~ ~ /c~ ~ i ~ PLC- 1,._ ~ ~ .liter T i~. i ~ ~~l %~~ ~ ~ ' j ~ ~_ _ ~ . _ `. r c~~~' =~7 / c~ %~L~ Zvi 1 ~~'7 f . -S~ • / ~/~C ~ /r T. =~l 7 ~~`f- _ 2~~ ~ ~ti ~ ~, ~~ ~J ' ~~ ~1-Cc~ (~1.L1' ~ , vim., ~ Gw-z~i ~ ~ -~ ~ ~ ~ (j~ ~~ ~ 7 ~ ~ ~~ -~~ y ~ja~7-os8~ ,I ~,L+ ~/~-~'t~ ~~` l ~i , , i, j, ~ r O~ Name Address Phone No. (optional) ~~ ~ ~ '1~ ~c ~r ~' ~~ ~. Y ~~~ ~ ~ ` r ~-~ UCLA '` `4 ,;;1 i~Cl / ' ~ -~ ` ! '` ~ / -~ ~ / -, , ~, ~ ~ 1 ~ ~~•- , -,/' , / •, C ~ / . ~. cl ~ Lit /" ~ ~ ,~f~ -1 ~% " c ~ ~G i~~ ~- ~~ C 1// , ,' - ~ ~- ~ // ~ ~ - ) ~4 ~ ) ~ -- ' - ~ dl ~{ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ _ _ cf ~~ /~ ~ , ~~ ~ ~/ ~ ~ i £ ` ~~ -~~ n. ceu~~ ~vti ~ ~ :~ ~ ~,~~~~ ~ ~- . ,~ . __ `~ ~ /a' ~ ,~ v it J' T ~ ~, ~ 1~'arr~e Address Phone No. (Optional) ' 1 ; ~ j~ .I ~ ` ~ ~,~~~ .., ;, ~ ,, ,, ':,, ~• ~=; ~; ~ ~ ~ ~ iL ~ ,~ ~ ;- ~.-~~%,~,~~ `~-rte.-~~~ ~ u c~~ ~ , ~ `-~~~- ~3 ~ ~ ~~z3 / °~ ,:. ,. - f ~~ ~T ,~ ,~"n ~ t' ~ ~r. N l / ~ ~ ~, /~5 /~~',C~~L~ ~ . j- Q :/~ ~~ Name Address 1.._~ , ~" _~~ ,,~~ _ ~ Phone No. (Optional) -- '.' S!~. ~~ ,~ Il ~/'~,T~JI \~__.i 1 ~~/ ~ ~~~1 ^ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~l `'[J.1 ~ rte`' ~ ,~., ~-~. ~~~~% i_:- ~~ ~ ~~~ 1 ~ y (~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ 7 ~ j l ~ ~ ~ /~ ' , `~ / - ~ ~-~ / ~ i l i - - J - 3~d? ~~~ Qom- ~N, z¢'d /S~ ~ - ~ ~_ ~, - .~ ~ ~. ~' , 1 L ., ~'~~-- ~' ~ ~ .~~ +.~~' - L' i '.~ ~~ ~~ ~ ...r-~r1!'. ~f} ~ ~ ~~ ~j'c~/t. _ t~-~ u~ /~~__ ~ ~ ~r'~ ~~; rn ~ ~ ~%~,~.f ~: C~~ 2 ~, L ~,. ~ ~~ 2~,, v ~ ~~.,-, /~.~. ~~- ~ 1, 2~~; y . ,~ / , t ~i ~-'~~ ^~' ~ ~~~ r Name F Address Phone l~io. (Optional) ~~i'1 / ~~~ 11 ,r~.y/ ~ ~ f ~ ~iiG ~, -'GC tr/ ' f fT ^~ci~.E~ l;~ ~/ /~ -t_c._;-.s~~ /~ fJI--.G"'='~ !~'~~ r ~ ~/ 1.L-~~c--c~~ y~~ I~-'t'ZL'yi,C"fh'~.~ `- ~G f ~ r: ~ I l L-F~ // ~ r- J / _ .~ ~~~°'~ i , L i ~- .~%~ yr Name Address i) i X~/ c'- j,'/ ~' ,J ,~ ,, . ~~ ~~ 1 ?~~ ~_ '~ „J~C ' .~~ _ ~~ ~ ~ L _ A ~`i J /, ~ ~ ~ 1~ , ~ ` , _ J < ~ ~'' ~ `t `~ 3 7 5..~ y ~~ . // ` Z~C~l, l . S .ice ' , i?.~-~'l1 ~ 3 Ly ,~ y~G'l ~ 3 C,` `. r~ ~~ .~ ,,~ -- ~~ />, Q: _il % 7i~i! + /, ,rte ~ Phoae No. (Optional) ~/-~ 7~ ~/~// ~~ ~~~ `~ Name Address Phone No. (Optional) /~ ~~ ~ F ~-~ r ~ C 11 2 5cA ~ ~ - 2 2 , _ -- .-~ ..~ ~7~ ~ ,, ~ , ~-. ~~i. ~ c - 1 ~ ~ _ ,.~ = . ~, ~ ~ ~ - ~ :~~~~ 1_rtv~ ~ Z7 :~ 't `~. C _ --,- ~ n <I 53~r 3 ~~s~ rG~,~- i I ~ io ~ i~ ~;~;h ~~c k ~n~ ~ 4~2~7-~~~ ~-~ ~~ J ~~ r 1 1 l-c.~~'1c'„L U -- lV'ame Address Phone No. (Optional) ~~' ~ ~iarr~e Address /~ ~ (~ 1 ~ u '1'1 1Y1 ..~ + Phone No. (OpNonat) j~ + 1 ' (~ 1') ~' ~ I r' t ~Y ~ ~- ~ y ~ ~ / ~ '1 • ° r ,.,~cz 1 + ~ ~~ ~~/ ~ ~, _. ~ ~ ~ ,~ /~ _ ., -. -- .: -~ ~ : ~ r.Q ~~' ~~ ~.7)~ .~ ~~ ,'10;3//'kc~ ~` ;1~~~ ~ ~~ ~~r ~~ ~/~L-'<'~/(~~, IOC) ~l -~ J C!J~7/t I~Y +~Q/7/~'~~~r_ L~/~ ti~ ~ ~~ ./ ~' c. ~~ ;~« ~ _ ~ - . Sao -C'~~~. ~ ~. ___._~ ~, 4~ , /c' _ °`'~~i~' ~ ~ / 'iJ'I ~ ~~ ,~L~(~ j l L~ i"I~/1'1 ~2C1/,,c.y`~'~!E. ~ •; /~ c ~ ~ ~ti~ r ~._._~ v ~1 = _ ~ ~- , ~ . .~ . ~a..~,.~ ~~ ~:.~-~ ~ _~ ~':3~r ~ , n rf-~N/~~ - r~?~ ~-I ~ ~ ~- ~~ ~~ -- KBE v~~~ .. / .~~ , a,i~~~ °_ ~~'T~ - .~c~~ - - ~~ ~.b (~ .1~~ ~-iZ~-o Zy~3 K~-C ~~ r ill '~./ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ • f~~~~ ~~ ~~~-~~y~~ /n~ , / ~ ~~ 1 t -Y1. 't r J ~~-- a ~, ~S~l ~;,d- Q ~ . _ _, ,-. _ ~ ~ r ~ ~f I( ~ ~ ~r ,ll ~~~ZZ ~- °~_! C~'1 '~/ ~ Ct_ r ~ ,' ~ ~.~i I (- 1 h' 1 Mkt .y (.-t'~ ~ ~ ~- I ~-1 ' ~ ~l 3 2 - ~- ,- Name Address Phone No. (Optional) Nye / Address Phone No. (Options!} C~ ~~ -, l~` Name Address Phone No. (Optional) .~ {{~~~, n ..~ C ~?/.' ~ L . J/ ri1M 3l ~l 7 ~t~lTi°L Ct.G.~~ k.t~ ~'~7' ~~r ~~ ~,1 ,~, - .,=- - ,,~ ~~ / lti~ t.c _~_ ~~ ~/ /~~~~/~ <<~. 5~/, 141 S'~ S/.~ T- .~ %-// Name Address Phone No. (Optional) ~ '' [~ ...._.~ f // ~J ~ _,~ ~ ~~~~~/ l~ Y / Ci.}/~tL~~..~..i ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ /y SST ~' ~- ~ t.% '"' %L. ~, ~~ ~ J r ~ZCr'-~ ~,•c~~;a- ~. /?' L~~- ~~.~w ~ v°~ l.- ~-b lam' ~' ~~~ ~ J. , ~; ~, ~I j-' ~ i ~~ ~1 ;L~l_..l~~f~ ,'1 ~ r~~~ ?j~.ttl ~ 1~T~ i~( f.>'-~5r~cl- I~iLL- )~ f`~.,,~- / -~~ ~~ ~ 7 i `~-~ ~ 3~ 3~ ~~~~ ~ ~- ~ 9 ~s 3~ 3 4 /~ ~~- 7--~ 97,E 3 a ~ ~ ~~. ~a 7-- ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ a~~ ~-~~ ~ ~ ~ 3~~~ ~ ~ ~~-~-~~~ rr. ~ I ~ `!! ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ L ~ ~ r -x.G CQi,-k,; --z~, ~ -~ ~~~ ~i 3 S~c .C1 , -;~( iL ~ `l '~ ~ '? ; ~ I - _ Name Address Phone No. (Optional) __ -~ G ,~. f ~i~ , ~y ~f1 .j/i ~ ,~ar/C ,_ ~ r L4 ~%~ ~ lam. .~ v .- _ -. ~ Name / "~l /.. Address /~~ ~ ~~~~ i 1 ! ~ Y ~-..~~ -, ~L 7 ~ ~L,~L ~~ Phone No. (Optional) ;~~~~ y~ ~ Z 3 S~ / u ~ ~ /; ~, Q ~~•t,Lu' ,'~,IC~C,z~ tz.~ r~ r c ~ r Name Address Phone No. (Ontionall ~, ~, ;~ ~ ;' ,-_ ~~~ ~j ~ Vii' ~ ~ < .~~.~ ~/~/~ l ~,~ - t y -~ ~~ :~ ~~r ~~- ~ t ~~~ %~ .--, ~ ~. - ~35 Y c~n~.a.O.Q_. ~ , ~~e~ ~3 vim/ ~ I ~~cQ ca~.A. d~-~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~c~~a~-s~. J~2 ~ Z - < < `~ ~,. --- ~~ v~~1J ~~~v ~~ U ~-- Name Address Phone No. (Optional) S ~, ,, .. .. ... _ _ ~ ,: _ \\\ .. f' _ - ~- ~ ~' ~ ~' ~ 1 ~ `ice ~J ~~ _ . ~ ~ ~~ -' .. '~ i r( ~~' -v _ ' . ~J ~,~ C. ~r "' V~Y ~~.~~f VY~~ ~'r VlV ~`i / `~' ~ \ J /l Ali l-L'liV C./i ~~ ~ J`~C~~ /'. ~ Y 1 \ /~/ ~ U~IIe~~cf ~~ a ,~ /~ 7 /' ,~n n ~ ~ a ~;-~~ - , ~ << ~:~ ~~s y ~/how Mf>,, ~:~ ~tZ 7- IlZ i ~.. ~,:~-', ~~U y1y~ ~ ~ ~ ,~,~~ ,~ - "`~-l ~~~~, ~~~N- ~ ~~f~Mrsa,~ ,_: ~:_>` -~~~'C E /dJ"~- ~S~ N ~(~: ~,l ~u~'~6c>~T r.-I /.~ ~j' L ~ _SL~oQ ~. i '=,:,~ ~ ~JG~S W I t-r~~ r, ~'SQ ~i ,~ ~ ~ ~~ 1 `' .~ ~~ ~ ~~, S/ 3 ~~i~, ,,, , _~ ~ ~ Name Address Phone No. (OpNonsi) L, ~ ~~ ~r _ ( ,~ . ; _ _~, , :i~ ~r~l ~~ ~- Z~ U a r ~ 1 ~~~~ ~.~~ ~~~~ y ~~u~~k~~vA ~~~~ ~Z7,~~~~ `~~ ~ 1 ! / i 7 1 1 3 ~' ~ ~~ u ~ ~~ kN ay~~y yd~ yyy~ J "' %~ ~ / .-, , _. , : .ate' ~ _ .~~ . ~.. ~[~% Name Address Phone No. (Optional} tt~12C.~ ~ /(~ ~1 G ~~-~'-1 7" v(o , l ~~~~Gt,t,t ~1 Ci'. /C.CD . ~l[ . ~.2 7 - C~ ~'~ Name Address Phone No. (Optional) -- ' ~ ' ~~ ~~ .r ~ ~ ~ /' _ / 1 j ~ r ~ ~ _ ^ ' /~ // /~+ ) _ ~~~ n ~, •._ .~ "" 1. ~% > L - ~? , -~ >i %~ _• -~ t ~~ ~ ~ ~ .. ~l. ~~ ,. ' /-' ~f n _ Name Address Phone No. (Optioaal) .J :-.r~tr:.r ~.t_//S %.z ~3F~1 r11 PI =5' ht RI Sri Rcnc~c+~`fA ~/Z7• SSc~ i i / ~ 1 ~'-~~ i ~ n.z I.~ r NS ~V ~1 / ~~l if) ~ i `~ l ~ ~~ 1/ .. ~ i i ,t I_ ~~_~. , . '.~,~_. ~-:~~'~ a.[':.r • I i ;j I ~ - ^ ~ _ ~ 7~ ~ > ~ ~ `7~ L _ '~ ~) ~1 ~~/r.-~ ~) ~~ °i ~ ~I f1M-f: '~' j •) ~~((~ "/ ~ (c w _ f,r~ YI 1_I ~ I _ ~~ (J r~t'J ~ ~^ 1 ~/ F.J v C • 1 ~ ~^ - Ll (i ~l./~ 1 ~ C~ ~ .N1 G~ ~.. 1~. / ~^ L I ~ ~ \~ ~i ~ l/ ~J CC, , ~ l=. I ~ ~ ~1 r 1 ~ ~ ~-~ ~~ L~J ~ C. ,'y M ,~7 t: I J f ~ ~ '- ~ f - ~~ Cr '~ ~ • . J~ '/ Name Address Phone No. (Optional) r 3 320 ~ X27- / 0? c ~ ~ ~v 3 ? ~ G~~ .~ z ~- ~iv~ - ~ ~-1-727 ca~N-bw ~ ~l ~ ~- 0 ~ ~ ,~ `F-~ G~ a Q /ce T 2 7- -5-6 s per, ~ ~~ 2 ~ *~-~c,~-~~ ~f ~~- 020 ,~ /.~~ ~~~~~ //7 S~°rn.~ tip, ,N ~ ~-~ --- 3 ~ S :,2 ~s' ~ 1 ~_ f\ 1 rC' !k`~'Y ,` • ~ 14DiJNT PLEASANT CIVIC LF..AG[TE MFNIF3I~iSHI P DRIVE If ~rou wish to join the Molant Pleasant Civic Lear;ue, please sign below and infor- mation will be sent out at a later date. Name Address Phone No. ,~ Y ~~ ~ b ~- ~~~P t-tz~~ ~ ~ti `~ ~ 1~1 ~ . ~ ~ ~t5~~~ i3 W n t ~{ ~ ~ - ~i ~ 37 / ~ ^~' l/ wit J` /'~e2~2 ~` S X~, YUl ~.~~~~ ,v~va~ d 7 • y~~~'> ~` '~~~~ Nar, ie -7 r ~- ,. n ._ Save Your Re sue Sr,~zad Petition To be presetztecl t~ roarcl of Supervisors Address Phone No. - UOa- rf ~/ i . .. _ ~~-- f ' b'DUr~ PL~F.ASANr CIVIC LF.AQJE MFIVBERSHIP DRIVE If ~~ou vrish to join the Mount Pleasant Civic Lea~s;ue, please sign below and infor- mation will be sent out at a later date. Nar.~e Address Phone No. _~~rn~.~ ~. r~-~~ ~ -31-~1 ~~~L ~~~H-Z Ste"' ~15~ Vim. `~'~`?` `~G I~ T--- • ,Name Save Your Rescue Squad Petition To be Presented to Hoard of Supervisors . Addre s s__.., Phone No . 1 /~ ~~~ y,,, c,~.~-~ ~~ cz-,_ `~ odd /~( ~ ~~ ~~ '~i .. % ,,~,,,,~ ~ ~ ~ I ~L~~ L' ~.~G • Save Your Rescue Squad Petition To be Presented to Board of Supervisors - Name Address Phone No. y~ ~, j v , w C~ j~{- t 5' c~ vt .~1~/ , SP~2 ~.OL l ~V ~2 2~a ~- ~' p/~ ~-~ L1 ii/ ,v Q , ~~~ W , w ~ SP Igo-.I~L~ ~1/ ~ ~ g o s s P~~- 9D ~ ~ ~y ~~ , ~'r~C , -- ~Vl~ 1 G1-ivy. ~od~~ .~-~o ~ sPR~~r~ l~~z~Q~C~ 5 y (~ ~ L ~ n o ~ ~ ~ g~ ~ Sp~•4.D L 1 ~v ,~ ~~c a~51~ ~UT2ov,G~ ~ i- ~ /6 ~ ~~~~ o~~I ,~~y~ ~ i G. 1 ~, ~~ ~l G , ~,!/ ~ ,y~' Lam`'--- ~ ~ ,~~ / ~4/i/,S~I ~L C,N ~ .C { 3~- f} Ll. (. N ~~ ~~~~~ Z7- U~1_l/a v ~ Name Addras Phone No. (Optional) n~ ~ c ~ ~~ ~'~~~' ~~ti'" ~~c-~ ~ 7 - Sys _ 1 / ~ M Name Address Phone No. (Optional) ,~ ~'~ ~~~~'~ C ~f`}Mi~ IJ 7_ / J `~ ~ ~ vr~r~ ~ ." l-' 1J ~ ^ I / 1 ,~ ~ ~ ~-~% ~~,~ .. ~~ c < < < ,~ 9 I ~~- ~' ~S ~ 7- i3 y~~ ya .- ~~ o ~ ~~ ~~~~ -.. AGENDA ITEM NO. APPEARANCE REQUEST -PUBLIC NEARING -ORDINANCECITIZEN COMMENTS ~. SUBJECT: ~ySvv~r ~ ~rv eY O UNo Idr oty-~S I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD- /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW-- • Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. • The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. • Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. • Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~ C~ f f~ ` , (,~ z yas s ADDRESS: ~52~5` ,~ nun a; ~,. ~ ~. ~ a;~~~a, Yt PHONE: (5~/~~ c/~y_ y982_ ~~ March 2001 To: From: Subj: Problem: Discussion: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Bradley R. Foro, 8235 Poor Mountain Road, Bent Mountain, VA 24059 Personal Property Tax Rate on Motor Homes Personal Property Tax on motor homes and recreational vehicles in Roanoke County is excessive (3.5%) • Virginia legislature enacted SB 115 creating 29 separate items of property that were each to be declared a separate class of property and constitute a classification for local taxation separate from other classifications of tangible personal property. It was signed 4 April 2000 by the Governor to be effective 1 July 2000. I have talked to Mr. Paul Mahoney, Mr. Wayne Compton, and written letters to Mr. Joseph McNamara regarding implementation of SB 115 and have been informed that Roanoke County is under no obligation to adopt this bill. Instead of acting on this bill, each indicated, "You are invited to present your case to the County Board of Supervisors Budget Meetings to be conducted in the spring of 2001 and try to convince them to change the local tax ordinance." I am here to present evidence of excessive taxation of a minority of county residents. • Mr. Wayne Compton states there are 311 recreational vehicles in Roanoke County generating $129,000 in personal property taxes. If all vehicles were equal, each would be paying $414.79 in personal property taxes. I paid $1,437.33, which is over 3 times (more than 1.12%) the taxes I should have paid in this category. That is excessive. • My assessment and taxes for 2000: Item Assessed Home $164,900 Motor home $ 44,500 Automobile (SIJV) $ 18,400 Va. 3% title tax and Dealer Bus. Lic. Tax (Motor home Purchase) • The following facts can be figured f Tax $1,863.38 $1,437.33 $ 381.50 $1,572.50 $ 94.78 rom the items stated above: - My home is worth 2.55 times the value of my personal property. - My motor home and car is 39% of the value of my home but the taxes are essentially equal to taxes on my home. ,~ • Other facts to consider in the determination of excessive taxation of motor homes: - My home is used every day of the year except during vacations. - My motor home was used 21 days in the year 2000. - For income tax purposes a motor home is considered a 2"d home and the mortgage loan interest is tax deductible. Logically, a motor home should be taxed at the same 1.13% rate as my home, mobile homes, and double wides. - The assessed value of my home increased from $88,000 in 1990 to $169,800 in 2001. My real estate taxes have doubled as well. The only tax benefit I receive from this increase is garbage collection. - The county eliminated our Bent Mountain emergency services personnel. I have personally observed a 20 minute increase in the response time for emergency calls. Increasing taxes should bring increased services instead of reductions. - A slight decrease in revenues from motor homes (assessments of 1.13% versus 3.5%) can be more than compensated for from the tax base as a whole. Alternatives: 1. Do nothing. This maintains a 3.5% tax rate on motor homes and penalizes a minority of county residents with an excessive tax. It also does not address SB 115 that calls for declaring motor homes as a class of property for local taxation purposes separate from other classi- fications of tangible personal property. 2. Set the tax rate on motor homes at the real estate rate (1.13%). 3. Set the tax rate on motor homes at a rate somewhere between 3.5% and 1.13%. Recommendation: Adopt Alternative 2. This would create a tax rate that is fair for motor home owners. It would comply with the intent of SB 115 by creating a separate class of property. Motor homes are not the same as personal use vehicles. There is no accommodation for them at the workplace, shopping malls, and other places where automobiles are used. Considering the occasional use a motor home receives going to and from campgrounds versus the time it is typically parked or stored, the personal property taxes paid are disproportionate and unfair. Any tax that is found to be unfair, unjust, or excessive should be reevaluated. If it is found to be excessive (which I believe I have satisfactorily detailed), it should be reduced and made just. Lost revenue can be made up from the tax base as a whole. I ask that Roanoke County reevaluate the tax on motor homes and grant sufficient relief to make it a fair and just tax. Thank you for'your time and consideration, ~ ~~ -.-~--- AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ A C~ d PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE ~~' CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: {n'~, ~Y ~ C~~,--~ 1~JC~ ,c Cti~ ~,~1~(~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED I~~S•]~ A ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: APP EQUEST ;~ ~~~L ~- ~' ~i~ ADDRESS: SZ-SC7 G~~CIx PHONE: ~-~ / 1 °~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~~ -J ~ ~ ~r tic ~a r ~rL t9-~ ~S ~ ~ VsZ ~ ~~i 172 / 3„zv `--_ , 1 '~ t•~ 1~2 f~ CurrQstt Circcc~.~S~tC~zcC'J' C~ Y1 ~'~Yu C~7 0 ~, /J ~Q ti ! r'.E,t f GJ/ ~ ( ~p ~rwGty ~ ~ l ~ V l 1' .t-l / / 5'/l rua ~' ~~~^~ I r~ lV ~rl.Z~ L,jr,o~rc.~t[~n ~i1 el-~ ~ t,<%i ~~ f~of !~-Q l rl ~~ !~t'~Ypp1L a ~ /V tX~nl ~~-du+.~.~ o~- /~ C-( ~l~e~~tJ' . L•~ T~r~ h ~~~ssl ~~ fl ~ Gt ~~ uu ~- C ~ n S ] ~ ~ r~ fro n a f ~~ -~~i.Sr~7~]T~ o~ uTi~/31t~~'~ ~'/.2 Q1ctJ'~r~~ ~~aelr~ evtfi w xr S - //' ~GtSQ~rL ~l'~ ~ ~~ Wt~~Gl~h ~~ CQ,Y~I~~~L ~l)©C7 C,vYY I C'0 d' ~ 1 3~ 7-~ ~ ruP ri~fy ~ f ' add.~~+a~+at c eY ~~ ~~ca~orin~,- C.~ ~ ~ow 1-1~ -~ ta.~ o`~ ~~ ~-5~~~~~ ~'~!].~ C'Cc~'? iyre~t~ ~h~~ /~ is ~Cci~1~K, O~~$iCi-C ~~ Cu~YY~ew~ CQY~I~C~ 000 ~ CGOYY tC~,p 1-.~Y "~ p•~r~oo~re a~~ preServ~v~C c7„~Q D yU^~e~"~tv~C ~~ ~ n~~ran Wlr^ti~~ ~ Vlt.(wC~e~, cw~~ s~w~C ~ ~~~~rr~-~ of ~~~~ C~u~,~y. ~.) T~ C, Q.,S' ~ ra b r ~r°~ • ~ s~o ~ 7~oN' Ct`-~•~ ,~ ~e~~Z`,~' ,~~~:~~~;~ -4-~ e~viv~nrtic.-~I ~ views Ind a~ ~vi.cc ,n~Y~~+y ~ ~.- 12~~t~ vacs COMMENT AND ANALYSIS ON THE REPORT OF ALEXANDER F. SKIRPAN, JR., HEARING EXAMINER, FEBRUARY 21, 2001 AND THE CO-LOCATION ANALYSIS, VIRGINIA GAS PIPELINE COMPANY, FEBRUARY 5, 2001. PREPARED FOR MARCH 12, 2001 BY BRENT C. RILEY AT THE REQUEST OF AND SUBMITTED ON BEHALF OF PROTESTANT ANDREW GENTILUOMO FOR CASE NO. PUA000079. Introduction The Utility Transfers act delegates to the State Corporation Commission the responsibility to act on behalf of the citizens of Virginia, essentially to exercise the power of the people in securing their well-being. A sacred trust. In exercising this trust, the Commission must decide if it is in the public interest that a merger of the NUI Corporation and Virginia Gas go forward and if so, should there be conditions. In deciding to approve, condition or disapprove this merger, the Commission will determine if the public will be properly or adequately served and will determine if the rates the public will pay, as a consequence of the merger, are likely to conform to reason, will the rates be correct, proper, reasonable, just and morally justified? If the Commission is not made happy, satisfied or sure these will be the likely results, the Commission shall use its discretion to determine what the circumstances require. Is the merger appropriate in the existing circumstances? Is the merger in the public's best interest? Is it good for Virginia? Will it reflect good public policy? The Honorable Alexander Skirpan came to Salem, Virginia on January 16, 2001 where he was able to receive input from a variety of sources regarding the appropriateness of the merger. Interested and affected public who had not been provided the opportunity to make comments or influence public policy prior to that time made comments. Of the 500 to 700 directly affected citizens and hundreds of other indirectly affected citizens, none were "effectively notified" of the pipeline plan. Comment and Analysis On page one, it states, "This case has generated considerable public interest, with several individuals adversely affected by the construction of a pipeline, by VG Pipeline opposing the merger." This observation is so substantially understated that it is misleading. While public opinion on the propriety of bringing a new supply of natural gas to the area is generally favorable, the plan to do so has received near universal condemnation. Local governments, including Roanoke City, Roanoke County, Salem City and Montgomery County have appealed through resolution for the plan that will be put into effect if the merger is approved, to be altered. Not only affected landowners but also area residents are nearly unanimous in their desire to avoid the costs the merger would bring as currently planned. The Roanoke Times has editorialized on the subject. (See Exhibit 1). Quoting from the Skirpan report, "Most of the public witnesses that appeared at the hearing urged the Commission to require VG Pipeline to collocate its new gas transmission pipeline within the existing easement for the pipeline owned by Duke Energy." (Skirpan p.7) Speaking on behalf of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, Paul Mahoney, County Attorney, asked the Commission to condition the merger to require Petitioners to collocate their new pipeline in the existing East Tennessee natural gas pipeline easement. (Skirpan p.7) There is reasonable basis to conclude area citizens and governments would generally oppose the merger if it were not conditioned on collation. In the public hearing on January 16`h, after hearing one witness after another say collocation was in the public interest, Virginia Gas Company President Michael Edwards volunteer that he had determined collocation would be twice as expensive. When questioned by a Protestant as to how he determined that, he had nothing substantial to offer. Upon a request for data, Edwards agreed to provide an "in house" collation analysis, which he did and submitted as a late filing on February 7, 2001. On August 28, 2000 at the Montgomery County Courthouse, I personally asked Mr. Edwards why he was so opposed to collocation. "Cost," he said. "How much more?", I asked. "A fellow told me it would cost twice as much," he said. Quoting from theVGPC Collocation Analysis summary, page 1, "...it is inescapable that co-locating the pipeline within ETNG's easement is cost prohibitive, would cause delays that could endanger the pipeline project and ultimately the merger ... and would hinder VGPC's ability to meet contractual deadlines." The VGPC Co-analysis study produced information that was consistent with Edwards' preconceived notions." The costs developed for collocation were based upon 100% collocation vs. 99% new easement. (There are specific places where collocation will bedone -for example, Blue Ridge Parkway crossings.) A major flaw in the VGPC Co-location Analysis is that it doesn't allow one to determine if there are portions of the existing pipeline easement where collocation is feasible or more economically efficient. Quoting from the VGPC Co-location Analysis, under Route Evaluation, p.3, it reads: "There are some locations along the co-located route, which are likely infeasible." The Roanoke County Reservoir is cited as an example. Clearly one would not reasonable expect the collocation option to be so rigidly analyzed to require going under a major reservoir. Rejecting collocation is an interesting conclusion due to the fact VGPC has purchased easements with the right to collocate a second pipeline in their 50' easement. In addition, rights have been purchased to collocate a fiber optic line in that 50 feet. In addition, rights have been purchased to collocate a telecommunications line in that easement. In addition, they have purchased the right to sell the easement to two or more additional parties with full easement rights, presumably to collocate additional uses, all in their 50' easement! The assertion that collocation is cost prohibitive is contrary to industry practice. East Tennessee owns and operates in Virginia, at the minimum, three pipelines that are collocated with a second pipeline in the same 5' easement. In fact, 90% of the easements purchased by ETNG in the last fifty years anticipate and plan for the possibility of collocating a second pipeline in a 50' easement. The VGPC Co-location Analysis includes quotes of a Gulf Interstate Engineering report. "Eighty feet of right-of--way width is recommended for an 8" pipeline. Clearly this recommendation will not be followed in the new 50' easements being purchased. In addition, the DEQ concluded the 50' plus the 25' temporary construction easement was generally excessive. The type of construction equipment used as well as design considerations would play a role in determining the workspace required. Clearly, locations where additional workspace would be required can be addressed through easement purchases, as is permitted in the 1000-foot corridor. The report asserts that collocating in the existing pipeline easement would result in additional costs and delays "imperiling not only existing contract obligations, but also endangering the merger itself." The fact that VGPC is iri effect bankrupt should not become a liability against the public interest. Good policy should not be hostage to unsound business practices; in fact it is one responsibility of the regulatory role to protect the public from weak corporations. It should be noted that an argument of "compelling public need" is not asserted as a basis to avoid delay. This is significant. In a conversation with John Williamson, CEO of Roanoke Gas, with whom a contractual obligation to provide gas exists and is the foundation upon which the necessity of the pipeline exists, I asked, "Could you manage if the pipeline was delayed a year?" Williamson responded, "Sure, we would do what we needed to do to make that happen. I've always considered that a potentiality given a whole host of circumstances." Williamson said Roanoke Gas is currently planning for just such a delay. The 2001 construction schedule is no longer consistent with RGC's "requirement for additional gas service." See VG Co-Location Analysis, under Background, p.3. If the merger itself is in danger from a delay due to these circumstances, that in itself could add weight to reasons for denying the merger. The public interest should not become subservient to corporate interest. The VGPC Co-location Analysis, Route Evaluation, p.3, indicates the co-location route indicated thirteen (13) subdivisions present "obstacles for construction" compared to six (6) subdivisions on their proposed new easement route. This is a suspect figure based upon my examination of the routes. Two subdivisions are indicated on the map, p.4, adjacent to each other at one specific location, the Brier Patch Estates and the Dan Coleman Subdivision. From my examination, it appears neither of these "subdivisions" will be seriously impacted. (See Exhibit 2 then Exhibit 3 with photographs A and B provided to address this point.) The Luther Park Subdivision likewise appears to pose no particular obstacle as the existing pipeline easement passes that area. Photograph A, taken from the road toward the northeast, facing the existing pipeline easement, is of the area from the platt map showing the highest concentration of small parcels. From the platt map, one might conclude growth and development could pose a problem. The photo shows growth is not a problem as might have been expected. Photograph B, taken from where the pipeline easement crosses the road looking southwest. Here again one might have expected growth to be a problem but it is not. A survey of the existing ETNG easement, in the section completely by-passed with the short-cut across Poor Mountain. indicates no substantial problem with having used that route. Apparently, it was 3 a matter of being 1.4 miles longer. Certainly, it was not based on case of construction, as the short-cut presents very difficult construction with the steep and difficult terrain. Exhibit 15 includes two photographs taken on the existing pipeline easement where it crosses Twelve O'Clock Knob Road. Photograph E faces north toward Twelve O'Clock Knob. Photograph F faces south. Exhibit 16 is an air photograph facing southeast toward Twelve O'Clock Knob. One can see no particular reasons, from these photographs, as to why this segment was not considered. Without knowing exactly to which stream and State Road crossings the Report refers, I believe these figures are highly suspect and exaggerated and would ask the SCC staff to examine their reliability. The Skirpan Report concluded on p. 15, "while I fmd the Petitioners' Analysis helpful, I DO ~ NOT FIND (emphasis added) that it demonstrated that VG Pipeline HAS CONSIDERED COLLOCATION (emphasis added) as an option prior to purchasing or attempting to purchase each easement along its path [as State law requires, §56-259, p.14]." Skirpan recommended, "that prior to purchasing any new easements ... Petitioners will consider / collocation (emphasis added) within its existing certified corridor where it is feasible and more economically efficient." (p. 15) ~~ ~s'~ a~ Virginia Gas has been somewhat unwilling to respect Skirpan's finding that it had not, as of its 5~ y4~ report on February 7, 2001, "considered collocation". The Roanoke Times news story, February 23, ~'\\~y~o~ 2001 (Exhibit ~) wrote that Michael Edwards of VGPC said Skirpan's recommendation for further ,~'/~,~ considering collocation was unlikely to have much effect. Edwards said, "Haven't we been considering ~~ collation for two years?" Probably not. It is apparent collocation has been considered only when it serves VGPC's interest to cross over existing easements or when it is required to do so by the Federal Government. Consideration of the impact on viewshed and owners of private properties doesn't seem to be on the VGPC's radar screen. VGPC's agent, Larry Knopp, approached Gail McFarland, a property owner, for an easement agreement on March 7, 2001. She reports she asked about the collocation matter and quoted Knopp as saying, "They said the merger would be approved if we considered it and as far as we are concerned, we considered it back at the beginning and it is no longer an issue.... They didn't say we had to do it, only that we only consider it, so we can't wait. There is no way this merger will not be approved and `~ Virginia Gas will get what they want.... If you are interested in collocation, it is not going to happen, and you are wasting my time and your time. It's not going to happen, the State is not going to tell us that.... I'm not going to discuss it, because it's not an issue.... We have got to get this easement done right away.... We'll give you seven days, then we go to court.... Virginia Gas will have every contract before the 27`"." Knopp also said they would get 40% to 50% less if they went to court. ~ Elaine Flippo was told by Larry Knopp that the recommendations of the Hearing Examiner didn't amount to anything and it (collocation) wasn't going to happen. He said to Flippo that (collocation) had never been considered and that Duke had made an absurd offer when backed into a corner two to three years ago. (See nttached affidavit. E,Chibit S.) ~~Q~~~ George Janasko was asked by John Knopp, a VGPC agent, if he was willing to sign an easement. When Janasko declined saying he wanted to wait until the collocation matter was settled, Knopp said he was not aware of how anything the Hearing Examiner had recommended would affect his procurement of easements. (See attached aff davit, Exhibit 6). PATTERN OF BEHAVIOR There is a pattern of behavior on the part of VGPC that is arrogant and disrespectful of property owners, admonitions of local governments, community values and state government. This first came to my attention last August when I met with James Talkington, a Vice President of VGPC. I said to Talkington, "It appears to me that you knew the notice placed in The Roanoke Times would not effectively notify property owners that their property would be effected." He nodded "yes." I said, "it appears from my review of the maps made available, that you (VGPC) could assume no one could tell where the pipeline was going`?" He again nodded "yes." I then said, "Further, it seems you waited until all time for appeals had passed before you notified property owners of your intent to survey their land." He again nodded "yes". Then Talkington said, "Its called information control." A review of a Roanoke Times story published May 27, 1998, indicates VG officials were concerned about a county plan to send letters to residents. "If you send out any information to the public, you may be misinforming them and causing concern, "Talkington said. "It just stirs up problems without it being necessary." On August 8, 2000, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, in response to citizen concerns for the environmentaUviewshed degradation entailed in the VGPC proposed route across Poor Mountain and in response to concerns by property owners that their land was being taken from them using the power of the state without an adequate justification of "need" (because collocation opportunities existed,) passed a resolution. In that resolution, they strongly urged VGPC to cease any further surveying and participate expeditiously in a dialog with Duke Energy for the purpose of seeking an agreement whereby new construction would co-exist in Duke's existing easement. The resolution referenced the fact the DEQ had previously recommended to VGPC that they seek utilization of the existing pipeline corridor. Virginia Gas had ignored the DEQ recommendation and sought certification in a very sensitive area (environmentaUviewshed). The shortcut route they chose for certification, and lies now outside their certified 1000' corridor, crosses a prominent peak of Poor Mountain and is disastrous for the interests of the Roanoke area. On Labor Day 2000, after the appeal from the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, on behalf of its citizens, for collocation and leading up to a September 7, 2000 public meeting on the subject, to be attended by VGPC, NUI (declined), Duke. SCC representatives, Roanoke Gas, three members of the Virginia Legislature, a Roanoke County Board member, a representative of the Blue Ridge Environmental Network and a representative of the Sensible Mountain Policy Action Coalition, VGPC sent its representatives into the field, working overtime until after dark. for the purpose of seeking new- terrain easements. Agents reported to a property owner, "They had been working 14, 15 and 18 hour days." In the two weeks leading up to the anticipated Skirpan report, property owner Genevieve Henderson received a call from the land agent who had been dealing with them. He told her VG was preparing letters to send out for the purpose of "intimidating property owners" and that she shouldn't let that upset her and that he would be coming to explain it to her. After receiving the Skirpan report with the recommendation "that prior to purchasing any new easements ... Petitioners will consider collocating....", nothing changed. Without question this recommendation is being ignored. Jim Talkington, VGPC, said: "This whole thing is kind of ridiculous to me. The condition that was recommended is merely a suggestion and not a requirement..." Talkington said that as far as Virginia Gas was concerned, they were "over the wire." Numerous experiences have been cited by property owners that add weight to the proposition VGPC is engaged in a pattern of behavior, an approach to public services that is myopic and irresponsible and of questionable legality. Examiner Skirpan's fmding that the proposed merger should be conditioned to require Petitioners to consider collocation prior to purchasing any new easements, fell on deaf ears and closed minds. His recommendation carries no weight, as resolutions before carried no weight. POINTS OF CONSIDERATION VGPC did sloppy and irresponsible route selection planning from the very beginning, relying maps and aerial photography, neither of which was sufficient. Their original proposed route crossed two nature preserves, a major landfill that had been capped, through major new subdivisions, and the Spring Hollow Reservoir, a major body of water. One wonders how that happened. The plan from the beginning was to parallel 80% or more of the distance with the existing ETNG pipeline. The one exception to parallel the existing pipeline entirely was a short cut across Poor Mountain that would save 1.4 miles of pipeline length. That decision to save 1.4 miles became far and away the greatest single objection to the proposed route. In 1964, the ETNG pipeline was constructed across the top of a nearby peak, Twelve O'Clock Knob. People concerned with the visual integrity of their community often puzzled at the rank foolishness involved in that routing decision because it became a permanent environmental degradation. Now again the single most shared community value, the beauty inherent in viewsheds, is again being compromised. Without being afforded the opportunity to participate in the pipeline routing, many, perhaps most, citizens of Roanoke were distressed to learn that the proposed VG pipeline posed a new and even greater threat to the visual integrity of the Roanoke Valley. This proposed route sought by VG was far more visible than the 1964 one. (See Exhibit ;). It went almost straight up a steep slope from a subpeak, followed a high and wide ridge, then skirted a peak of Poor Mountain, before dropping straight down the opposite side of the mountain. While it picked up on AEP electric transmission line, it promised to make a highly visible path directly across from the Blue Ridge Parkway, and three major overlooks, as well as to be visible to Southwest County, an area long appreciated for its beauty. In the photograph (Sec Exhibit 7), one can see the existing ETNG easement up the peak on the left. The proposed "short-cut" route. which lies outside the 1000' corridor is on the right. 6 Photograph C faces to the northeast toward the City of Salem and shows how prominent the mountain scaz will be. To the south lies the Blue Ridge Parkway and whose visitors (the most used component to the National Park System) will see the scar. Photograph D, facing west, shows how prominent the route would be up the ridge to the peak from the Salem side. Also, one can see how the AEP easement is bazely visible due to the long 1 f 2 mile span from the peak down to the left with the next tower being off the left side of the photograph. This shows that it is a fallacy to conclude using the AEP easement is appropriate from a viewshed point of view. Exhibit I8, photograph A, shows again the fallacy of believing the AEP easement is sound from a viewshed perspective. This view facing southeast along the AEP line from the top of the mountain indicates again how little effect the AEP easement has visually, due to the long distance to the next tower and how mature vegetation exists under it. Citizens knew from previous experience that a pipeline up and down very steep slopes, like that facing the Parkway, never adequately heal. Because the AEP tower neaz the top of the mountain is '/z mile from the next tower, the wires are very high in the air and mature trees grow in the easement. The wires aze even then faz above those trees. The upshot is that the visual consequence of the existing AEP easement is very little. To have the proposed pipeline easement either parallel or collocate with the AEP still means a highly intrusive environmentaUviewshed consequence will be visible all the way to the Mill Mountain Overlook, just below the Mill Mountain Star. It is interesting to note a photograph of Roanoke on the Mayor's office wall as well as on the front of the 2001 Roanoke calendaz, shows Roanoke with the peak in question on the horizon in the center of the photograph. In addition to being on the Mayor's wall, the photograph was placed on the cover of the 2001 calendar for the City of Roanoke. Refer to Exhibit 17 to see a copy of the photograph of the Roanoke calendar with the peak in question background center. While the peak is quite a distance away, it still has significance as far away as downtown Roanoke. Simply put, there is a sense of disbelief that public policy allowed for such a major environmental consequence when most feel it was completely unnecessazy -- that it was the work of a highly irresponsible corporation, unwilling to consider the implications for the people it was to serve. That bitter pill became the foundation on which Roanoke County, Roanoke City and Salem City all passed resolutions asking that if at all possible, the new pipeline be constructed in the existing pipeline easement. Beyond the harm to individual properties that resulted from plans to parallel, not collocate, this short cut across Poor Mountain is at the heart of opposition to Virginia Gas' proposal. There is a sad realization that has come of late. The original plan to come across the mountaintop skirted the very peak. (See Exhibit 9). James Talkington prepared a topographic map last ~ fall purporting to show the route that was to be taken. That route was terrible enough to the viewshed but a visual inspection of the surveyed route last week indicated it will cross the peak top dead center then go down the peak toward the Blue Ridge Parkway and Southwest Roanoke County in a manner that can be described as "horrible for the viewshed." This new route entails even greater viewshed costs than previously anticipated. A close examination of this topographic representation shows how the route would skirt the peak of Poor Mountain. Unfortunately, the very steep terrain there was not anticipated, (See Exhibit 18, photograph B), and the survey indicates the easement will cross the peak dead center which will be even more viewshed destruction from an even greater distance. This peak is directly visible from the Salem side and Southwest County side. Actually from the Mill Mountain Star Overlook. Note the very, very steep drop from the peak toward the right. This is important, not only visually but because it will not heal in a lifetime. Another disaster associated with the 1000' corridor. When one views the mountain peak in question, it is clear (See Exhibit 10) that it is centrally located to the Roanoke area. From this exhibit, one can see that it is situated in an important way to the lay of the Roanoke Valley. Not only is it visible to a traveler down Interstate 81 for five to eight miles, but hovers above the parts of the Valley where those seeking beauty and undisturbed viewshed are likely to seek residence, Southwest Roanoke County. The public uproar is not based on objection to a pipeline per se; it is viewed as simply too great a price to pay due to the insensitive nature of the route. It is nearly universally held there is a better way and it is reasonable to hope that those charged with securing the public good will eventually get there. It is clearly understood that the power of the state was given to VGPC to proceed in a certified corridor. That has been granted and cannot be reversed now even though a full understanding of the circumstances did not exist at the time of the granting of the certificate. However, it is also understood that state law §56-259 mandates and requires that "prior to acquiring ANY EASEMENT (emphasis added) or right-of--way, public service corporations will CONSIDER (emphasis added) the FEASIBILITY (emphasis added) of locating such facilities ON (emphasis added), over, or under existing easement..." A review of the map on page 4 of the VGPC Co-location Analysis shows that approximately ninety (90%) percent of the 1000' certificated corridor has an existing easement within it. Reason says the big majority of it would qualify for collocation. The VGPC Co-location Analysis is severely flawed because it says, in essence, that if we have to follow 100% of the time the existing EGNG easement, that is not feasible. What would be feasible if going under the Spring Hollow Reservoir, going through the major new subdivisions that have built up along the existing gas easement, and going through the nature preserves or other areas outside their certificated corridor which would require re-certification, were not factored in? Can one really say that re-certification would be a major problem, should VGPC seek to use the existing ETNG easement? Except, of course, for places it was truly not feasible. Probably not. There are two basic concepts of needs underlying the current circumstance. First, is there actual need for the gas? Clearly the wells and storage capacity owned by VG are an asset within the state that should be utilized. With the very steep rise in the price of natural gas. economic logic says the demand will level off or even drop in the short term at least. With Roanoke Gas concluding their contractual needs are not imminent and that other reasonable options exist to mitigate their "need" for gas from the VGPC project, is it not reasonable to allow for a more deliberate and reasonable approach to this project? Surely the power of the state is not properly exercised to simply secure the financial well-being of a corporation, over the public well-being. when that corporation engages in practices that hinder its 8 financial well-being. The power of the people should not be used to reward irresponsible social and financial policies, except in rare circumstances. Simply put, the need for gas flow through this project is not compelling in the short run or sufficient to justify a decision based upon it. The other concept of need provides the foundation on which the power of the state is needed to take from one and give to another for the common good. This is the basic concept that underlies the requirement of the public service corporation to be serious, through and throughout to justify the use of state power in taking property from an owner of property. The law says "WILL (emphasis added) consider the feasibility of locating ... ON (emphasis added) ... existing easements." The Commission must determine what the evidence shows. To allow VG to get by with aless-than-serious "consideration" would allow for the possibility of greed prevailing over need and would amount to tyranny sanctioned by the State. No one disputes that the safety of workers engaged in constructing a pipeline or any other endeavor, is of high importance. No one disputes constructing in the vacinity of an existing pipeline would require additional costs. However, seeing pipeline construction in process, one can see that measures are commonly used to prevent damage to curb and gutter, driveways, etc. Also, it is a common practice to mitigate all safety concerns in pipeline construction. One would have to question the logic of concern for the safety of construction workers by VGPC when an examination of the topography across the peak of Poor Mountain is examined. Also, to argue that excavating an injured worker by vehicle rather than a helicopter, as is implied in the VGPC Analysis, is questionable. It certainly is not justification against collocation There are design considerations like a thicker wall pipe or burying it deeper than the existing pipe that are reasonable to consider when addressing safety in co-locating pipelines. Current Circumstances A plan is on the table, that will not be implemented, if the merger does not go forward because VG is essentially bankrupt. (See Riley comments to the Acquisition Hearing, Exhibit 11). In its present form, this plan has created great consternation throughout the Roanoke Valley because interested and affected individuals did not participate in its formulation, because it will result in great harm to the environment/viewsheds and compromise an important financial asset, the scenic beauty of the Roanoke Valley, and because it is commonly believed the advantages can be achieved without the great costs having to be paid. This plan was advanced with deliberate efforts by VGPC to keep interested and affected parties from participating in its formulation. At its inception, VGPC was not open to feedback from State agencies or local govemments that it consider collocation. All affected local governments have pleaded with the public service corporation, VGPC, to respect community values and to seek a better way, to co-locate their pipeline in the existing gas pipeline easement. This pattern of behavior, of being unresponsive to feedback and advice continues to this day. The advice and recommendation of Examiner Skirpan is being ignored. Instead of considering feasibility of using existing easement. VGPC is stampeding ahead with the intention of intimidating 9 property owners into signing easement agreements. Legal action is currently being threatened against owners for the purpose of constructing a pipeline on new terrain without adequately considering the feasibility of constructing that pipeline in an existing easement on their property. (See Exhibits S, 6, 12.) Essentially, property is being taken from individuals without it being based on need, the very foundation of eminent domain power. Duke Energy, the corporation with the existing pipeline, offered some proposals that would address the concerns raised by the local governments and essentially said that if those proposals were not sufficient, VGPC could come back with proposals of their own and that Duke would be willing to expeditiously facilitate any plan that was agreed upon. Hearing no response, Duke was preparing some numbers to send on when a much delayed letter of disinterest was received from VGPC. Duke Energy is currently planning a 24" natural gas pipeline in Southwest Virginia and as a result of that plan, thoughtful analysis is needed now more than every to insure adequate service at just and reasonable rates. (See Riley comments at Acquisition Hearing, Exhibit I1 (B) (C). We have a situation where the ground has seriously shifted. The immediate contractual need for gas does not exist and other pipeline plans are on the table which may affect the viability, even the survivability of this project. (See Riley comments at Public Hearing, Exhibit 11 (C). To complicate matters, resentful property owners aze signing easements for an 8" natural gas pipeline. (See Exhibit 12). How reasonable and viable will such a plan be? Fortunately, for VGPC or whomever may acquire them, the large majority of easements they have currently purchased aze on properties that already have the existing easement. Agreements are usually general enough to allow construction anywhere on the property. Others that aze prepared in specificity as to location of the easement being purchased, also allow for shifting to the existing pipeline easement if the SCC "requires Grantee to collocate said pipeline with the existing ETNG/Duke easement. (See Exhibit 14). Circumstance Implications There aze opportunities for the public if the merger is denied at this time. That would break the pattern of irresponsible corporate behavior and begin a new course that could have significant public benefits. A plan could then be developed that would protect the environment, preserve viewsheds, and bring the lowest possible costs to consumers of natural gas. Rejection of the merger, under the present circumstances, is good for the public because it will allow additional public interests to be realized while some significant public costs aze can be avoided. Once this project rises again, it will likely result in major and significant collocation in the existing easement. Once the easement is partially collocated, logic will dictate that it become significantly collocated. There is a better way. Rejection of this merger based on current circumstances is in the public interest. EXHIBITS ATTACHED io AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY MARCH 13, 2001 RESOLUTION 031301-3 CERTIFYING THE CLOSED MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened a closed meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such closed meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the closed meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the closed meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the Certification Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Church, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor McNamara A COPY TESTE: ~' Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Close Meeting File ~~ A-031301-4 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~~l AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 13, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: Report and Recommendation Concerning the Purchase of the Salem Bank and Trust Building COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: For the past few years, staff has tried to acquire property to relieve part of the space constraints within the Courthouse. The County also leases space in several buildings and as open property (for parking) particularly to house activities such as the Department of Social Services, grant funded programs under the supervision of the Court Service Unit, and space for parking by the employees and patrons of the Courthouse complex. At this time, we have a ten year lease for the Department of Social Services at the Salem Bank and Trust Building with two five year options. The base lease will expire March 31, 2007 and the second option will expire March 31, 2017. Staff has given to East Main Properties, L.L.C., owner of the Salem Bank and Trust Building, a contract to purchase said property for the amount of $2,400,000 subject to several conditions being found acceptable. These conditions include such items as the HVAC equipment, plumbing, elevators and electrical systems will be in working order; the roof and basement will be free of leaks; condition of the roof; elevators working; and that the terms and conditions of the existing leases be acceptable to the County. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Staff has retained the services of Hayes, Seay, Mattern and Mattern to review and evaluate the building. The consultant suggested several items to make the building more serviceable from the buyers perspective. Based on the concerns outlined above, HSMM has advised that we should consider upgrading the electrical service to the building, bring r the building into compliance with ADA accessibility standards; modify the elevators; install new accessible unisex toilets; install a new fire alarm system; and provide emergency power and communications to the elevators. HSMM determined the load limit on the floor to be 100 psf and offered suggestions as to the installation of a compact filing system to serve the Department of Social Services. HSMM provided a cost estimate to add a sixth floor and feels that the other loading conditions are acceptable. Staff also contacted Environmental Directions who assisted with the mitigation program for a leakage of fluids from the elevator in the past. Environmental Directions has checked the monitoring wells and have given us a verbal indication that the results of the spill are clean. We are working with the Industrial Development Authority as a source of funding for to allow the purchase of the property. The County's Financial Advisor is working to obtain suitable financing to be managed through the Industrial Development Authority to purchase said property. There are several questions related to existing leases that must be appropriately resolved in order to finalize our offer. FISCAL IMPACT: Attachment A shows the projected cash flow from the building. Net income before debt service ranges from $276,099 to $370,466 over the next 15 years. The suggested method of financing is a lease/ purchase through the IDA, similar to the transaction that was done for the Roanoke County Administration building. The entire building will be owned by the County of Roanoke, leased to the IDA for a period not to exceed 25 years, and leased back to the County. The County currently leases three of the five floors of the building for Social Services, so the financing will be 60% non-taxable and 40% taxable. On February 27, 2001, the County mailed Requests for Proposals for financing the purchase of the building to interested banks and financial institutions. We asked for 15 and 20-year amortization scenarios. We are currently evaluating the responses, however it appears that we will be able to pay for the debt service over a 15 year period within the available funds generated from the rent in the building. 2 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above information, staff recommends the following: 1. Authorize the staff to proceed with finalizing the purchase of the Salem Bank & Trust building. 2. Authorize staff to work with the IDA to create a financing package for approximately $2,500,000. Respectfully Submitted by 4 ~" John M. Chamblis , Jr. Asst. County Administrator ACTION Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Approved by: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Motion by: H. Odell Minnix motion to improve staff recommendation cc: File John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant Administrator Diane D. Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer Danial Morris, Director, Finance VOTE No Yes Abs Church _ x Johnson _ _ Abstain McNamara_ _ Absent Minnix _ X _ Nickens x 3 Attachment A 0 O ti O O N O (O O O N O 0 O O N O ~ ~ C O ~ N, ~~ m ~ O L ~ ~' O 0~ N C m M O ~ O ~ O N N w O tf! N ~ O ~ r ~ °o ~ N a 0 r O ._~ O t6 O a N 00 o r~cflornoocOmrn CO v c~o c0 rnvvorr-v~nM tn o 11') O In OD ~ LA cf (D I~ ti ('M r ('7 N mil' O O d' r O O r In OD ~- r In In C70M N O~CnOhOf~CO~- O r O) aD O N (D CO (~ N ~ ~ o M M M 0000 (DOOM r t!') r 0 0 0 r (D In O N CA r Cn r (O tr M O (`M O 00 N M (h r ~' CA h O N N O O ~ CD h ~- ~ M M 00 O O N ll~ M tlD O N C(> OC) O r Mtn r O O W t10 (D r (p L(') O M r In I~ r O cD ~ r r N r '3 C` O O ~ M O> ~Y O (O N h- V' O N CO 1~ O 1~ Mef>~OONrNO r (O chO ('o ~l~OOUiCVoD~(V oo ui tlD CD ~ O N T O N~ (A O O O 'a' W M N 00 O H O '~ N dC) N r tom- d' ap .- O ~ ~ (V O N N ~ ~ r r N r 1~ N M M V'O tt I~COCOOM~rNM M r In O lf) Ct I~ M O O ~ O ~' O ~t ~- (D O O r- ~ O M O O CA l!) O O (O O O O N O N d' (O aD I~ d' 6i O D O M M O I~ ~ MOM [h ~ O ~ O `-~ ~~ ~ O N ~ C~ N C O o 0 M M N ~ O d' r to O O I~ N I~ In N ~ O 00 O O ~' C.10 O O O r CA V' N r O N C7i r ~- N CA O ai ~ Cn C l! i N ~ N r ~ ~ 1~ O O dD (O I~ N CA cf O (O ltd r I~ In Cn CD N if i O lA O O M r Lf~ ~ r N~ ~ ~ M E ( D M M N M O M ~! i r N O O) to M I~ t0 O ~7' NO N O~d'O V'Nd'Nt!] O N I` CU L( ) ~ OJ CA O (A M GC1 ~' r OC1 O O M B O LL) 00 r M I~ O O C~ M O O o0 N CO M C O 1~ ~ CD U1 M In ~ OC) N r tC) M M CA O V' 00 ~ M r r r CO N ( O O a0 O ~- O O In ~f O Cn d' CA O OD O a0 N 'd' O O O I~ CO O O ti O r OD ~ C.A (~1 O O ~- N ~A d' O Cf' In I~ M O r l!') f~ C~ ~- r r C10 0C1 tt O r OD O O r ~' M N O M~ I`~ N oo' o ~ ui N Cri ai 6i e- oD M r r r CD N M 00 0 O V'O~hMODOMO I~ M (O O (O O N Cn O Q) ~ t!7 N (O d; r 0000 0 ~tY'NC'oCV r~(p~ O CO ~(? M O In lf") In 61 O CO tf) 0 0 0 V' ~ r~ r r~~ ~ M ~ 0 M M N d N ~ c U ~,, ~ C N ~ ~ C C d C v~ ~ ~ ~ 0l4 c ~ d ~ C > a, ~ ~ y? o ~ ar r c ~ ca c L ~ ° N c a ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ __ ~ ~ c~ +J ''~ c c 7 E U ~ ~ C, C V to N d U .~ +~ rn a~ m ~ d ~~ ~ ~ ` d ~ ~ ~ a o. O ~ 'II > > ~ ff~ N O L' N ~~ Y O Q 1... L ~ac>ammmww QI u,a ~ w ~ z ~ O ~ M O N O to 1~ M d' N Q N ~ I~ O I~ N N E O M OD N N to r tt) ~ N (fl o~ r- I` ~ ~ O ~' ti ti to ~ M ~ (O M O Cn N ap I~ 1~ N I~ OD ~ tD M N O N O ~ ~ ~ ~ N N M N M M ~ N h-O ~ ti~MO(fl~~li~tfi M V' (p ~t O ~t O M O O N O O (O V' ~ O ~ QO O oD `7 CV ~1' ~ I~ M r- CA N h O ~ ~(p r- ON~MI~NMMO O N ~ O M d1 a0 O O l0 O Q r- O H O O O O N N O N N M~ O ~ N ~ r ., ~ ~{ ~- M OO O N~000(O~Q(DQ O ~ to i`~ O f~ N ~- Ali O M (O d' M In M M ~ 00 O of (~ ~ c7 (`M tom- I~ c- ~ (O N (O ~ ~ (fl O Q ti O O O tfi ~ O ~Y' ' ~ O ' ' ~ (HM O )CO.- (D~1~ MQ(Dt! ~ d N O ~ N O N O V A N M M ~ O ~ N t~ ltd 0 ~ r O ~ to r O ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ V' O M O Q M Q (O O `- .- O ~ N Q M ~- ~ O~ (D O Q ~- ~ N (D oD O ct lA In In d' s- 1~ ~ O r- ~ O M M to N f~ N c- ~t O I~ ~ N ~ O (r1 a0 ~ N O N ~ O~ ~ O N N N M ~ O M ~ ~ d' O V' ~ O t~ 0 0 ~t ~~ M M ~ M ~O '7 O~d'ONNNV'~ d' O ~ h (O M O M N O M (p 'd' cy' M I~ Q r N M CO C' Q~ ~ M N M 1~ ~ ~ ~ O O N N ~ N~ N ~ ~ N Q ~ ~' d' M M O M M N O O OD O l~ ~ ~ ~ aD N OO O QOOOltitnCDI~M ~ O ~ oO O OD (D CO (O N ~ ('M T ~ O ~ O ~ N CO O 01 N Q1 O~ '~' O r' M M V' ~ m M N M CO (D ~~ ~" I~ ti ~ N O O In 00 ~ N I` O Q O M M r- N N M N ~ N ~- Q ~ V' ~ (O O CO ~ Q1 ~ O~ (O O M O CD O ~ O V' t~ `.Y' O O ~' O N ~- M N N `- d- O cf' ~i' M ~ ~ M r ~ O lCi OD (~ ~ O (D CO O M (D N O (D In Q N (O 6i O O M N M M (O N O O N (O r- ~' f~ ~ O r 00 O N I~ ~~~ M O O N ~ N c- ~ N ~- M M d. ~ 00 O OD O M In O M In N Q 00 V' Ct O hO I~ ~ V OONNM~~ rt M ~ ti 0 r O ~ R 0 0 0~ C'M Q ~ (Q ~ ~ tt~ 'ct O o0 N ~i' (D N tt7 1~ Q ~M ~ NO(OMOO(~1p~ 00 (D O I~ O ~ CV I~ O Q O N ~ rn N Q O ~-<-N~ 00 r M ~ M N O 00 t0 N oO O ~ I~ O ~ ~ ~ d' O I~ O ti O N N O a0 cr 0 0 OD ~ N O N O N CO 0 0 d' ~t O M O~ ~" ~ ~ M r (O I~ M 00 r M Op ~- In M ~ 00 O O N M GO r h- (fl ~1' M O N (O ~ M ~Y O N N (D N (D I~ ti~ CV N ~t N o~ O r r N r Op ~- M M M d N N U ~ C U (II N C ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N C O (Q C d C> ~ rn y .c ~ ~ O O ~~ "" O N w ~ C~~ w C O , ~ . of `°( QC~~+~O~+,~. ~ c~ ~ ~ _ ~ o T~ E ~_= ea = C ~ ~ ~ tN/1 (0 A C C C E E E U C 'O 'l7 .~ .~ V 'j 'Q ~ C t C 3 ~ C Od ~_ EN.. ~O v,~O~.~~~~v' c~U~00n]C1l W W S d3 w.G V ~ ~ ~ W Z ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 13, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: Report and recommendation concerning the acquisition of real estate located at 220 East Main Street, Salem, Virginia, known as the Salem Bank and Trust Building COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: This will be discussed in Closed Meeting prior to consideration of this item. The staff analysis supports purchasing this building for utilization by the County and Courthouse complex. We are requesting permission to pursue financial alternatives for purchasing of this building with the understanding that contracts will be brought back to the Board for approval. BACKGROUND: Over the past decade the County has explored various options with respect to satisfying space needs of the Department of Social Services and other governmental offices located in the City of Salem. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: County staff is preparing documents and materials to submit to the Board in support of a recommendation to acquire the real estate located at 220 East Main Street, Salem, Virginia, known as the Salem Bank & Trust Building. We are financing through the Industrial Development Authority. We would request an opportunity to discuss these acquisition issues with the Board in Closed Meeting on March 13, 2001. Staff will distribute to the Board for its review additional documents and a recommendation at that time. G:\BOARD\2001\March0l\3-13salem-bank.doc ~-1 Respectfully submitted, Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Vote No Yes Abs Approved () Motion by Church Denied () Johnson Received () McNamara Referred Minnix to Nickens G:\ATTORNEY\SPB\REALEST\salembank&trust\report.3.13.frm AGENDA ITEM NO. ~~' APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE ~CITI2EN COMMENTS SUBJECT: I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GL//DEL/NES L/STED BELOW. ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ADDRESS: `7 `yL~ ~~ ~~~~~,/~~d~/%-~~C: S PHONE: ~ ~~~~ Action No. Item No. -S- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 13, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE ACCEPTING AN OFFER FOR AND AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF 37.86 ACRES OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED IN THE CITY OF SALEM (THE LLOYD PROPERTY -TAX MAP NO. 194-1-1) COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This is the continuation of the second reading of a proposed ordinance to authorize the conveyance of a 37.86-acre parcel of real estate located in the City of Salem (Tax Map No. 194-1-1). BACKGROUND: The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County has previously declared this property to be surplus property and available for sale to the public. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Roanoke County has received an offer to purchase a 37.86-acre parcel of real estate located in the City of Salem and known as the Lloyd Property. A public notice regarding the public hearing for the sale of this surplus property was published in the Roanoke Times on January 30, 2001 and February 6, 2001 and March 13, 2001. FISCAL IMPACT: The proceeds from the sale of this property will be allocated to the Capital Projects Fund. U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\REALEST\LLOYD.RPT s~ RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends that the Board approve the second reading of this ordinance and authorize the County Administrator or any Assistant County Administrator to execute the necessary documents to consummate this transaction. Respectfully submitted, r Paul M. Mahoney Roanoke County Attorney Action Vote No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Motion by Church Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) McNamara Referred ( ) Minnix to Nickens U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\REALEST\LLOYD.RPT 2 S-I AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 13, 2001 ORDINANCE ACCEPTING AN OFFER FOR AND AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF 37.86 ACRES OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED IN THE CITY OF SALEM (THE LLOYD PROPERTY -TAX MAP NO. 1941-1) BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property has been declared to be surplus, and has been made available for sale; and 2. That the public notice regarding the public hearing for the sale of this surplus property was advertised in the Roanoke Times & World News on January 30, 2001 and February 6, 2001; and That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading of this ordinance was held on January 23, 2001; and the second reading and public hearing on this ordinance was held on February 13, 2001, and continued to February 27, 2001, continued to March 13, 2001, concerning the sale and disposition of 37.86 acres of real estate located in the City of Salem, and known as the Lloyd Property; and 4. That an offer has been received from of real estate for the sum of to purchase 37.86 acres and this offer is hereby accepted; and That the proceeds from the sale of this real estate are to be allocated to the capital reserves of the County to be expended solely for the purposes of acquisition, construction, maintenance, or replace of other capital facilities; and 6. That the County Administrator, or any Assistant County Administrator, is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said property, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\REALEST111oyd.cl£wpd 1 i ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 13, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: Budget Presentations on the Upcoming Annual Budget for FY 2001-2002. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This time has been set aside for presentations to allow social service, human service, tourism, and cultural agencies the opportunity to orally submit funding requests to the Board of Supervisors for inclusion in the FY 2001-2002 budget. This work session format will allow a more focused presentation that will benefit the Board members and the requesting agencies. Please find enclosed an updated listing of organizational requests that include prior years' actual payments, FY00-O1 approved budget, and the organizations' funding request for FY01-02 for your review during the presentations. These schedules can be inserted into your work session notebook. The "proposed" funding column has not been completed. The County Administrator will make recommendations for funding and present them to the Board as part of the FY2001-2002 proposed budget that is planned for April. The written requests and accompanying literature submitted by each organization has been placed in the Clerk to the Board's office for review. Respectfully submitted, Brent Robertson Budget Director Approved by, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Approved Denied Received Referred To ACTION () Motion by: ~) ~) ~) ~) VOTE No Yes Abs Church _ _ _ Johnson _ _ _ McNamara _ _ Minnix _ _ _ Nickens Appendix III - BOS Contributions County of Roanoke Board of Supervisors Contributions to Local Agencies Human Service Agencies FI' 2000 Acutal FY 2001 FI' 2002 FI' 2002 Budget Request Proposed Adult Care Center of the Roanoke Valley $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 12,480 Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association - - 1,500 American Red Cross 4,000 Association for Retarded Citizens (ARC) 10,000 - - Bethany Hall 500 500 6,600 Big Brothers and Big Sisters of Roanoke Valley 3,000 3,000 5,000 Blue Ridge Independent Living Center - - 10,000 Blue Ridge Regional Education & Training Council - - 3,470 Bradley Free Clinic 5,000 5,000 6,000 Camp Virginia Jaycee, Inc. ($14,000/yr for 5 years) - - 14,000 Prevent Child Abuse 3,500 3,500 3,850 Child Health Investment Partnership (CHIP) 16,660 16,660 21,600 Conflict Resolution Center - - 6,000 Council of Community Services-Info and Referral Center 3,000 3,000 3,150 Court Appointed Special Advocate (CASA) 2,000 2,000 6,000 Family Service of the Roanoke Valley 4,000 4,000 6,000 Fifth District Employment & Training Consortium - - 24,118 Smith Mountain Lake 4H Camp - - 3,000 Good Samaritan Hospice, Inc. - - 7,500 Goodwill Industries Tinker Mountain 5,000 15,000 16,000 Habitat for Humanity 11,000 League of Older Americans (LOA) 13,750 13,750 25,968 Literacy Volunteers of America-Roanoke Valley 1,000 1,000 3,000 Mental Health Association - 640 1,200 Multiple Sclerosis Society - - 1,000 The National Conference for Community and Justice - 610 1,000 Roanoke Area Ministries 1,000 1,000 6,000 Roanoke Valley Drug and Alcohol Abuse Council 1,000 - Roanoke Valley Interfaith Hospitality Network - - 25,000 Roanoke Valley Speech & Hearing Center 1,000 1,000 1,000 Salem/Roanoke County Food Pantry - - 10,000 Southwest VA Second Harvest Food Bank - - 10,000 The Salvation Army 2,000 2,000 2,000 TRUST 5,000 4,750 12,000 Young Audiences of Virginia, Inc. - - 5,140 YWCA - - Subtotal -Human Service Agencies $ 87,410 $ 87,410 $ 274,576 $ Health and Social Service Agencies Blue Ridge Community Services $ 79,332 $ 79,332 $ 117,755 TAP 30,000 30,000 33,500 TAP-Transitional Living Center 20,000 20,000 22,000 Subtotal -Health and Social Service Agencies $ 129,332 $ 129,332 $ 173,255 $ Cultural Enrichment and Tourism Agencies Art Museum of Western Virginia $ 2,000 $ - $ 8,000 $ - Arts Council of the Blue Ridge 2,000 2,000 3,000 Center in the Square Operating 45,000 35,000 75,000 Explore (The River Foundation) 170,000 215,440 215,000 Harrison Museum of African American Culture - - 5,000 - Highland Cultural Coalition 500 I S Appendix III - BOS Contributions Julian Stanley Wise Museum FY 2000 Acutal 20,000 FY 2001 Budget 20,000 FY 2002 FY 2002 Request Proposed 35,000 Mill Mountain Theatre 7,500 5,000 8,500 Mill Mountain Zoo -Operating 8,000 5,000 12,000 Capital($125,000 over two years) - - 125,000 Miss Virginia Pageant 500 - National D-Day Memorial Foundation 10,000 10,000 10,000 Opera Roanoke - - 1,200 Planned Pethood Clinic - - 1,250 Roanoke Symphony 6,000 6,000 10,000 Roanoke Valley Crreenways Commission 10,800 10,800 11,400 Roanoke Valley History Museum 7,500 7,500 10,000 Salem Museum/ Salem Historical Society - - open Salem-Roanoke Baseball Hall of Fame - 3,000 3,000 Science Museum of Western Virginia -Operating 25,000 10,000 25,000 Capital - - 25,000 Southwest Virginia Ballet - - 1,000 Transportation Museum -Operating 10,000 5,000 15,000 VA Western Community College -Scholarship Fund 5,360 5,420 5,470 Handicapped Access 1,000 - - *Site Development/Improvements - 32,267 32,267 Vinton Dogwood Festival 1,000 1,000 1,000 Western Virginia Land Trust 4,000 4,000 - Subtotal - Cultutal and Tourism Agencies $ 335,660 $ 377,427 $ 638,587 $ Dues and Per Cauita Allocations Blue Ridge Soil and Water Conservation District $ 1,250 $ 1,250 $ 2,000 Convention and Visitors Bureau 112,500 112,500 125,000 Economic Development Partnership 112,500 112,500 133,919 Fifth Planning District Commission 29,654 - 38,018 National Association of Counties 1,557 1,557 1,557 Roanoke Regional Chamber of Commerce 2,500 2,500 2,500 Salem/Roanoke County Chamber of Commerce 6,000 6,000 6,000 Capital ($10,000 per year for 4 yrs.) - - 10,000 Roanoke Valley Sister Cities 3,000 3,000 3,000 Vinton Chamber of Commerce 500 500 500 Virginia Amateur Sports 40,000 40,000 60,000 Virginia Association of Counties 13,940 13,940 13,940 Subtotal -Dues and Per Capita Allocations $ 323,401 $ 293,747 $ 396,434 $ - Grand Total All BOS Contributions $ 875,803 $ 887,916 $ 1,482,852 * The $96,800 capital contribution for VWCC will be paid out over three years, with the first year's payment coming year-end savings. r r AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 13, 2001 RESOLUTION 031301-5 REQUESTING THAT THE STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION CONSIDER THE UTILIZATION OF EXISTING EASEMENTS WHENEVER FEASIBLE IN THE MERGER OF NUI CORPORATION AND VIRGINIA GAS CORPORATION WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has previously submitted its comments to the State Corporation Commission on Case No. PUA000079, the proposed merger of NUI Corporation, VGC Acquisition, Inc., and Virginia Gas Company; and WHEREAS, on August 8, 2000, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County Virginia adopted Resolution 080800-4, emphasizing the important of co-location of public utility facilities wherever feasible, and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia continues to support the co-location of this new natural gas pipeline within the existing natural gas pipeline easements. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AS FOLLOWS: 1. That the construction plan that will be implemented if the State Corporation Commission approves the proposed merger of Virginia Gas Company and the NUI Corporation will not be in the best interests of Roanoke County or its citizens; and 2. That consideration should be given to the feasibility of utilizing the existing pipeline easement of Duke Energy where it exists within the certificated 1000 foot corridor; and 1 3. That the propriety of additional certification should be considered to allow the use of the existing pipeline easement where it is feasible outside of the current certified 1000 foot corridor for the purpose of preserving and protecting the environment, the viewshed and scenic integrity of Roanoke County. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this resolution be forwarded to the delegates and senators representing the Roanoke Valley in the General Assembly requesting their support for the Board's efforts to preserve the environment, the viewshed and scenic beautify of the Roanoke Valley by encouraging co-location wherever feasible. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Church, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor McNamara A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File State Corporation Commission Virginia Gas Pipeline Company Duke Energy Corporation Virginia General Assembly Delegates and Senators representing Roanoke County Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 2 o~ ROANp~~ - ~ ,h z c? rasa Board of Supervisors P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix, Chairman Bob L. Johnson Cave Spring Magisterial District Hollins Magisterial District Joseph B. "Butch" Church, Vice-Chairman Joseph McNamara Catawba Magisterial District Windsor Hills Magisterial District Harry C. Nickens 2001 Vinton Magisterial District March 13, Ms. Victoria S. Dillard 1505 West Carrollton Avenue Salem, VA 24153 Dear Ms. Dillard: Enclosed is a resolution of appreciation upon your retirement which was unanimously approved at the March 13, 2001 Board Meeting. On behalf of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County and its citizens, I wish to offer my appreciation for your many years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to the County. I am pleased to send you this resolution, and notification that Roanoke County has purchased a $100 Savings bond in recognition of your years of employment with the County. This bond will be forwarded to you from the Federal Reserve Bank at a later date. If you would like to have your resolution framed, please bring it to the Clerk's Office, at the Roanoke County Administration Building, 5204 Bernard Drive, at any time. It has been our experience that framed resolutions may be damaged when mailed. On behalf of each member of the Board and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept this Resolution and savings bond with our best wishes for a productive retirement and continued success in the future. Sincerely, ., u ~-C H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Attachment cc: Joseph Sgroi, Director, Human Resources Dr. Betty McCrary, Director, Social Services OFFICE: FAX: VOICE MAIL: (540)772-2005 (540)772-2193 (540)772-2170 E-Mail bos C~co.roanoke.va.us ~F ROANp~.~ , ti °~ ~ ~ ~ -('~' 1, ~ r Y ~ az ~1 I trl'11'Y1'T'1't' Tl'T ~ Tl" X1'1'1' Tl' C? 'D Board of Suaervisors H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix, Chairman Cave Spring Magisterial District Joseph B. "Butch" Church, Vice-Chairman Catawba Magisterial District P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 March 15, 2001 Mr. Joel H. Peck, Clerk State Corporation Commission 1300 East Main Street Richmond, VA 23219 Dear Mr. Peck: RE: Case Number PUA000079 Bob L. Johnson Hollins Magisterial District Joseph McNamara Windsor Hills Magisterial District Harry C. Nickens Vinton Magisterial District Attached is an attested copy of Resolution No. 031301-5 requesting that the State Corporation Commission consider the utilization of existing easements wherever feasible in the merger of NUI Corporation and Virginia Gas Corporation. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, March 13, 2001, by a unanimous vote with Supervisor McNamara absent. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Y~t.a'~~-~ `''' Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bj h Enclosure cc: Paul M Mahoney, County Attorney Virginia Gas Pipeline Company Duke Energy Corporation Virginia General Assembly Delegates and Senators representing Roanoke County OFFICE: FAX: VOICE MAIL: (540) 772-2005 (540) 772-2193 (540) 772-2170 E-Mail bos C~co.roanoke.va.us o~ Roanlo,~~ , ti ' ,,, 9 ~ ~ __ 1838 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE MARY H. ALLEN, CMC ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 2401 8-0798 BRENDA J. HOLTON CLERK TO THE BOARD (540) 772-2005 DEPUTY CLERK Internet E-Mail: mallen@www.co.roanoke.va.us FAX (540) 772-21 93 Internet E-Mail: bholton@www.co.roanoke.va.us March 15, 2001 Mr. Wayne Strickland Roanoke Valley-Allegheny Regional Commission Metropolitan Planning Organization P. O. Box 2569 Roanoke, VA 24011 Dear Mr. Strickland: This will confirm that at their meeting held on Tuesday, March 13, 2001, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to appoint Vice Chairman Joseph B. "Butch" Church to complete the unexpired portion of Mr. Fenton Harrison's three year term on the Roanoke Valley-Allegheny Regional Commission Metropolitan Planning Organization. Mr. Harrison recently resigned, and this term will expire on July 1, 2002. If you have any questions concerning this appointment, please let me know. Sincerely, Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Enclosure cc: The Honorable Joseph B. "Butch" Church ® Recycled Paper Mar-06-O1 09:29A SALEM/ROANOKE COUNTYCofC 540 387-4110 o'b"~~ ~.; I 14: r„ '; I~. A r ~~ ~~ Inaor~or~led Erroif~lsAred I A31 2001 load d 0lr~ecG-n Dr. I..,or[ainc I.angc X(x1IIVAr CN1AllY HISOC .1r.'~1Mrr Alainp Shively NWgkry- !wr i,Salra 1,cnpn Ikrwning Nrw,,~nar Awrrrev I:oBegr Carey Harveycutter whe r'rac r .ire Roger I]alton 1'Icri~rrar eAr~indw c ~~w~. Juha D'Orario R(:l' Rrwrner Carulc k3n,ckrrwn Mrheadb (.'rrdlcrnr, lrrc. )'alma Aland rr,.nn c>'... rk. Daaicl O'17onncll w+,arrs C''n„rry ion Ncss cewiadirrk CAMu Charles Oslerhoudt, Airy, C,7llhrltYWl.I~i1N/I11Y11. NM. Ildrdlw, Top, Alwrn~0 A rerauwr, rrr.. Faye Senawbsugh 71Yw, Inc•. Harry tincrd~ss .lerafcwr UlccMc Pr,... RddiC Ycatts 7r~e Krq`o Cn 17aniellc Rand-Byrd Mmrur lkm! Richard aoodpastute r,rp c;,r~/kr~l Carol Ridgeway Joc Cundiff furl NrRlrb Nwt 'l~od (irievenbnxk /awes William °/+U" Janice ''IiMhr 7itwzr Brian (i, T)uvall t:hmwAer Flxnmr~ hrk,nr 9 North College Ave. P.O. Box 832 SAlettt. VA 24153 1'lwne: Sao-sR7~7x67 Fax: 540-387-417 0 March 06.7001 Mary H. Allen, CMC Roanoke County Administration Center P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24098 Dear Ms. Allen: As Executive Director ~ the Salem-Roanoke County Chamber of Commerce, I would like to speak to the Board of Supervisors at the March 13 meeting. I would like to di9cuss the renovation ~ the Carriage House and potential funding assistance from the Roanoke County 2009-2002 budget. Thank you. Thank you also for your assistance in preparing for this masking. You have been most helpful. {f there are any questions, please call me at 387-0267, sincerely, /K~e~~. Brian G_ Dwall Execukhra Director Salem-Roanoke County Ghamber of Commerce P.02 chumba'~c~saltmva.vrg ~ ~ !' HARRI5ON MUSEUM OF AFRICAN AMERICAN CULTURE PROPOSED BUDGET* July 1, 2001- June 30, 2002 SALARIES $92,000 Executive Director 35,000 Director of Development 30,000 Executive Assistant 27,000 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 9,200 Medical and Hospital Plan 3,335 Retirement Plan 4,016 Disability Insurance 129 Annual Leave 1,720 PAYROLL TAXES 7,360 Employer's FICA Taxes 7,038 Unemployment Taxes 83 Workers' Compensation 239 INSURANCE 5,900 Liability Insurance 5,900 PROFESSIONAL FEES 5,408 Audit 3,000 Accounting/Bookkeeping 2,000 Banking Services 408 CONTRACT SERVICES 4,800 Maintenance Fees 4,800 MERCHANDISE PURCHASES 1,500 Museum Merchandise 1,500 SUPPLIES 4,200 Office Supplies 2,500 Housekeeping Supplies 1,700 TELEPHONE 6,867 Telephone Expenses 6.867 UTILITIES 5,500 Electricity 5,130 Gas 240 Water 130 2mi2ooi 1 POSTAGE/SHIPPING Postage Freight Messenger/Delivery Service TAXES/LICENSES Licenses/Permits Taxes/Fees EQUIPMENT RENTAL/PURCHASES Computer Equipment Equipment RentaUMaintenance Furniture Purchase Telephone Equipment PRINTING/PUBLICATIONS Printing Books TRAVEL Out-of--Town Travel Vehicle Rental Local Mileage CONFERENCES/MEETINGS Registration Fees Speakers' Honorariums Speakers' Accommodations DUE5/SUBSCRIPTIONS Professional Dues Subscriptions ADVERTISING Advertising/Public Relations BUILDING/GROUNDS UPKEEP Security Extermination Building/Grounds Upkeep & Repairs HENRY STREET FESTIVAL OTHER SPECIAL EVENTS ARTWORK/ARTIFACTS MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL *Subject to Funding Availability 3,000 1,100 1,800 100 410 250 160 11,096 3,800 4,200 2,000 1,096 4,750 4,500 250 1,650 1,000 500 150 1,700 700 600 400 1,800 1,500 300 6,400 6,400 9,459 1,781 400 7,278 19,500 2,500 2,500 500 $208,000 ziz~izooi 2 ROANOKE VALLEY GREENWAY COMMISSION FY2002 BUDGET REVENUES SOURCE: LOCALITIES Population % of Total OPERATIONS PROJECTS TOTALS ROANOKE CITY 93,800 46% $13,800 0 $13,800 0 ROANOKE COUNTY 76,525 38% $11,400 0 $11,400 0 SALEM 24,406 12% $3,600 0 $3,600 0 VINTON 7,175 4% 1 200 0 1 200 Subtotal 201,906 $30,000 0 $30,000 OTHER OPERATIONS PROJECTS TOTALS FY Carryover $129,972 $0 $129,972 Va. Dept. of Forestry grant 5 000 5 000 Subtotal $129,972 $5,000 $134,972 TOTALS 159 972 5 000 164 972 BUDG2002.rev February 28, 2001 ROANOKE VALLEY GREENWAY COMMISSION FY 2002 BUDGET EXPENSES Code Item Budget 1010 Salary-Coordinator $ 40,470 1020 Salary-P/T Secretary $ 9,720 2100 FICA -Employer Contribution $ 3,238 2200 Retirement - VSRS $ 5,666 2300 Group Health Insurance $ 2,507 2310 Group Dental Insurance $ 155 2202 Deferred Compensation $ 120 Leave Account $ 2,000 Subtotal $ 63,876 5350 Volunteer Insurance $ 600 3013 Professional Services $ 89,046 3510 Printing $ 2,000 3610 Advertising $ 600 5210 Postage $ 2,500 5230 Telephone $ 600 5501 Travel $ 1,500 5504 Travel -Conferences $ 2,000 5801 Dues and Membership $ 150 5890 Purchases $ 200 6010 Office Supplies $ 600 6013 Small Equipment $ 100 6011 Photocopies $ 750 6101 Photography $ 300 6201 Books $ 150 Subtotal $ 101,096 TOTAL $ 16,972 BUDG2002.rev February 28, 2009 PRESENTATION BEFORE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BUDGET WORK SESSION MARCH 13, 2001 Thank you for the opportunity to speak with you today about the Child Health Investment Partnership of the Roanoke Valley. An estimated 5,478 children in the Roanoke Valley live in poverty, including 1,236 children in Roanoke County. This poverty statistic is the single most significant predictor of poor outcomes for children. Children from low-income families are more likely to go hungry and to suffer educationally. They are at greater risk for serious health conditions and are more likely to die before their first birthday. Without the support and intervention offered through CHIP, life would be very different for many of our children in the Roanoke Valley. I'd like to take just a few minutes to tell you about two such children and their families. Stevie is three years old. At age 2, he was diagnosed with leukemia. Stevie's home was filled with physical violence, and when the doctor diagnosed his leukemia, Stevie's father left. Stevie and his mom now live alone in aone-bedroom apartment. Stevie's mom suffers anxiety attacks, and their CHIP nurse provides support and comfort when Stevie gets sick or when she needs someone to talk to. The nurse also schedules the CHIP van to take Stevie and his mother to chemotherapy treatments at the hospital each week because they don't own a car. Now that Stevie's illness has stabilized, a CHIP Family Case Manager visits every month to show Stevie's mom games and activities that will help him get ready to start school. In Stevie's life, CHIP makes sure he gets to all his doctors appointments and treatments (which are at least weekly), and is a lifeline of support to his struggling mother. Paul's was born very premature and weighed 21bs., 2 ounces at birth. His mother suffers from severe diabetes, serious heart and lung problems. She suffered a heart attack before Paul was born. Although she's only 28 years old, her doctors don't anticipate that she will live much longer. Paul is attached to an apnea monitor and oxygen tank, which makes it difficult to travel, especially when his mother isn't feeling well and has to take Paul's three year old sister, all Paul's equipment, and catch a bus to their destination. CHIP is there to take Paul to his doctors appointments and therapies. Paul's Family Case Manager visits each month to help his mother understand how his development should be progressing and provide ideas for age-appropriate games and activities. 2 CHIP is trying to improve the quality of the limited time this 28 year-old mother has left with her children. CHIP has provided guidance for managing Paul 's illness, transportation to appointments and support for this very sick and overwhelmed single mother. Recently, a CHIP team (comprised of a nurse and family case manager) enrolled a set of twins who had been on the waiting list for three months. The twins, five months old at time of enrollment, were severely malnourished and weighed approximately four pounds each -normal weight range for afive-month-old baby is 12-16 pounds. The CHIP team had the twins admitted to the hospital the day of enrollment. Had the twins not been enrolled that day, it is unlikely that the severity of their condition would have been recognized in time, and their chance for survival would have been greatly diminished. CHIP serves an average of 1,500 children annually from the cities of Roanoke and Salem and the counties of Roanoke, Botetourt and Craig. Currently, 84 children living in Roanoke County are enrolled in the CHIP program. Each CHIP child is provided a private physician from a network of more than 721oca1 providers and is placed in the care of a CHIP nurse and family case manager who provide care 3 coordination and family strengthening services. The outcomes of our enrolled children and families speak to the success of the CHIP program. 93% of CHIP children are fully immunized by age 2, compared to 72% statewide. ^ 90% of CHIP children are up-to-date on well-child visits by the first 15 months of life, compared to 50% statewide. ^ 80% of CHIP children are up-to-date with preventive dental visits, compared to 19% statewide. ^ CHIP mothers consistently average a 21.5% increase in their level of employment after two years in the CHIP program. CHIP is also successful in changing the health care utilization patterns of a high need, high cost population. A study conducted by the School of Public Health at the University of Alabama at Birmingham yielded the following results: ^ Medical claims for CHIP enrolled children are over one thousand dollars ($1,113) lower per child than claims for a comparison Medicaid group ^ CHIP saves state and local governments and area hospitals an estimated of $1.28 million in medical claims each year ^ As a regular source of care, CHIP is helping to reduce health expenditures otherwise covered by tax dollars by 21.7% 4 CHIP is proud of its success in changing the health care status of the most at-risk children in our community and grateful to those who support us in our efforts. CHIP depends on the commitment of private citizens and organizations for nearly half of all our operating funds. CHIP was grateful to receive $16,600 from Roanoke County last year. At a cost of $1,048 per child for one year of CHIP services, CHIP supplies $88,032 worth of care to children in Roanoke County. We respectfully request $21,600 from the County this year so that we may continue to provide quality care to needy children in our community. Respectfully Submitted, Arlene Murphy, 5575 Salisbury Drive, Roanoke, VA 24018 Volunteer, Child Health Investment Partnership of Roanoke Valley 5 ~ Over 40 different sports in an Olympic-style sports festival ~ More than 10,000 amateur athletes compete annually ~ Nearly 90,000 athletes have competed in the last 11 years ~ Recognized by the USOC, the NCAA, the VHSL, and sanctioned by the National Congress of State Games ~ 2 - 2,500 Scholarships awarded =^ VIRGINIA AMATEUR SPORTS, INC. i r~ ~ VIRGINIA AMATEUR SPORTS, INC. VIRGINIA AMATEUR SPORTS, INC. On November 17,1989, the Governor's commission on Sports and Physical Fitness passed on an endorsement to the Governor for Virginia Amateur Sports (VAS) to serve as the state organization to hold the State Games of Virginia. In 1992, the Games were officially recognized as the Commonwealth Games of Virginia. The State Corporate Commission incorporated Virginia Amateur Sports, Inc. on February 9,1989. The corporation should be governed by a self perpetuating Board of Directors, composed of not less than 9 directors nor more than 36 directors. The Boazd of Directors is the governing body of Virginia Amateur Sports through the President of VAS who serves as the Chief Operating Officer of the corporation and subject to the control of the Board of Directors. The President is responsible for implementing the by-laws, carrying out the mission statement and developing and coordinating the Commonwealth Games of Virginia, as well as other events planned by VAS. In addition, the President oversees the staff as well as the marketing, fund-raising, and the operation and administration of the Games. The President also serves as the organization's representative to the National Congress of State Games (NCSG), the governing body for state Games programs in the United States. The NCSG is acommunity-based multi-sport member of the Unified States Olympic Committee and subscribes to the philosophies of Olympic family members. As a member of the NCSG, eighty percent of the sports offered in the Commonwealth Games must be either Olympic or Pan American sports and must adhere to state or national governing bodies' criteria. Each of the 44 sports offered in the 1999 Commonwealth Games of Virginia met these requirements. As stated in the Mission Statement, VAS subscribes to promoting an awareness of physical fitness and healthy lifestyles, promoting relevant sports-related educational programs, and lastly, conducting the Commonwealth Games of Virginia. COMMONWEALTH GAMES OF VIRGINIA The Commonwealth Games of Virginia is an annual Olympic-style competition designed and held for the residents of Virginia. The Commonwealth Games are open to Virginians of all ages and skill levels. From archery to wres- tling, this multi-sport event furnishes the competition venues for 44 different Olympic and Pan American sports. With its motto of a "Tradition of Excellence," the Commonwealth Games represent the true spirit of amateur athlet- ics. For some, this celebration of sport is a stepping-stone for following the dream of representing the United States in the Olympic games. For others, the Games are a place to compete in a favorite pastime. Regardless of the age or skill of the athlete, the Commonwealth Games of Virginia provides the pure pleasure of competing for the love of sport. The Commonwealth Games are more than sports events; they go much deeper. The Games teach values such as teamwork and good sportsmanship, which are important components of everyday life. The Games encourage athletes to develop and improve their physical talent and competitive abilities. Lastly, the ideals of the Games promote physical fitness and encourage Virginians to adopt a healthy lifestyle, which includes exercise. More than 4,400 athletes competed in 29 sports in the first Games. More recently, in 1999, the Commonwealth Games of Virginia hosted over 10,000 athletes competing in 44 sports, used over 80 sporhing venues, and worked with more than 1,500 volunteers. In our 10-year history, nearly 80,000 athletes have competed in this Olympic-style atmosphere. The success of these Games has been immeasurable. The Commonwealth Games is the official state games of Virginia, sanctioned by the National Congress of State Games, and recognized by the United States Olympic Committee (USOC), the National Collegiate Athletic Associa- tion (NCAA), and the Virginia High School League (VHSL). ~.. . ! /~i ~_ ~,yR G What: An Olympic-style sports festival for Virginia's amateur athletes of all ages and skill levels. When: July 20 - 22, 2001 Where: Sporting venues throughout the Roanoke Valley and surrounding communities. Who: Virginia Amateur Sports, Inc. was named the official organizer of the state games by Governor Wilder in 1990. The Commonwealth Games are sanctioned by the National Congress of State Games and are recognized by the United States Olympic Committee as the official state games of Virginia. Affiliations: The Commonwealth Games are recognized by the Virginia High School League, National Collegiate Athletic Association, the United States Olympic Committee and by many of the national governing bodies. Funding: State and local governments, corporate sponsors, entry fees and individual gifts. Sports: Archery, Autocross, Badminton, Baseball, Basketball, Summer Biathlon, Bowling, Chess, Cycling, Disc Golf, Equestrian, Fencing, Field Hockey, Jr. Golf, Gymnastics, Ice Hockey, Judo, Karate, Kayaking, Lacrosse, Mountain Biking, Powerlifting, Racquetball, Roller Hockey, Roller Speed Skating, Running, Shooting, Soccer, Softball (youth and adult), Sporting Clays, Swimming, Tennis, Track and Field, Girls Volleyball, 2-on-2 Volleyball, Water-skiing, Wrestling. Kickoff: Opening Ceremonies will be Friday, July 20, 2001 at the Roanoke Civic Center. Join Virginia Amateur Sports with the Parade of Athletes, lighting ofthe Olympic-style cauldron and much, much more. 2000 Highlights: Over 10,000 amateur athletes from across Vu~ginia. Olympic wrestling medalist Tom Brands and UVA Mens Baskeball Coach Pete Gillen addressed the crowd at Opening Ceremonies. Live 1-hour prime time broadcast of Opening Ceremonies on the ABC affiliate, Virginia's 13 WSET. o ~° v m ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ on `" y •~ o0 ~a ~ a~ ~w ~ ° v o o a. ~ '~ ~ `~ ~ ~ o ^ ;3 ~ _o ~ ~? o ri ;:.~z.~ .:~fc,1F.i.s ~', o r 1 id .. a~i .o p+ ~ U 'C ~~f` V Y ~y ~ ~ ' ~ Ill~~~r'~ ~i I~~rr tip a ~ N R, O .Sl, id b d ~, ,i~ 1. ~ ~'~,~ ~ ~ q v v ~ ~ a~ ids ~V~ ~~1VI Vlkl ~'~ ~~'~~ r~'~r.~~~:~~,r~x~- 1~1 •~ ~ a~ o .b b .~ ~ Q. rn W ° `~ ~' a~i o ~ o ~Y ^ ~ ~ ~ , ~ L. Y~~ Lf~ I~ ~i~l~t +~~! ~~~'. w ~ ~*,`~ n ~ ^ ~ ~v o i A o`"p ~ o a~~i FPM w ~ ~` ~ ~ w ?? oo "o a~~ w ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ -~ '~ .~ ~ ~ o W~ EN ~~wN~~ ~~ ~.~~ b 0 ~ ~~ ~ ~1 ~ `'~ ~v, 3 ~ O~" I N c~ 0 N O ~~ O ~ ~ 4 Mu _ ' ao ~ ° U~~ ~~° Y 3 0 r 1`'~ 0 I '. vY" t.~: . > ~ Fy F ' » s" ~ ~ U ~ Cd a7 cG ~ ~ ~+. U V ~ N ~; ~ ~ ~ H O ,~ bq 3 ~ N '~.., ~ by A~ ; ~ ; ~~~ I~'.,~ ~°. ".. .;~':t-t''^~ ~ ~ ~ p ° ~ vim. ~ ~ v, r ~ I~~1 s 4~ jam' ~ ~ ~ X00 O ~ ~ U ~ ~ O ,N rut ~ sx F 41 ey~~ _-____ ~ ~a $y ~~....3 r ~t" dt; ; oti ~" ~ O O ~" O .cC+ t~ a_. w ' ~ ~a a~ ~ - ~ _ a> tom a U U a~ o v~ a+ 'o uV f"~ 'Y ^ti N M 1~ ~r , W y 1~ ~ ~ ~~ r ~.., ~ V! gU~l O ~ O g ,. ~ ~ -Q o `° o C7 c aoo C9~ R~ z= N Z~ L r O t N ~ t~A ~ G 7 ~ ~ ~ Y Q, o ~ \ ~ m U °` ~ o U~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U m R~ ~ o O N r O ~ ~ ~D O O ++ u' y rn cv N N W ~ c° _' ~ o ~ O ~O ~= ~ :+ h W 2000 Commonwealth Games of Virginia Estimated Economic Impact On-Site Expenditures Entry Fees Average Fee=$20 * 9,374 athletes Gate Receipts Average Price= $5.00 * 18,748 attendees (1:2 ratio) Concessions and Merchandise Sales at the Event Conservatively estimate expenditures per pay per person $10 * 28,122 attendees * 3 days Direct On-Site Impact Gate Receipts+Entry Fees+Concessions/Merchandise Amusement and Recreation Multiplier Total On-Site Impact Off-Site Expenditures (See Explanation) Direct Spending 55% Indirect Spending 20% Induced Spending 25% pers/dy $112.50 Final Figures Total On-Site Expenditures Impact Total Off-Site Expenditures Impact Total Impact Discount 30% of total because spent by valley participants Total Impact of 2000 Commonwealth Games = $7,950,932 _ $T 87,480 _ $93,740 _ $10 _ $843,660 _ $1,124,880 = 1.66 _ $1,867,300 _ $1,867,300 _ $9,491,175 _ $11,358,475 _ $3,407,543 Explanation of Estimated Economic Impact Expenditures On-Site Expenditures (a) Expenditures include hotel/lodging, eating and drinking places, automobile/gasoline, retail, transportation services, and amusement and recreation services. (b) There is no indication of what percentage of these expenditures were spent by 'locaIs', where a Local is defined as anyone within 75 miles of the Roanoke Area. The numbers are biased upward unless expenditures by locals is discounted. Off-Site Expenditures (a) Direct impact measures the direct spending by visitors on the event itself or things like retail, dining, lodging, etc.; (b) Indirect measures how the direct spending influences the business of 'supplier- chairi firms, which are ancillary firms that realize increased business when the firms directly influenced receive extra business (e.g. increased business at the Holiday Inn may increase the business of the catering and laundering services used by the Holiday Inn); (c) Induced impact measures how the employees of all impacted firms are spending their additional incomes (as a result of increased business flow) throughout the region. (d) `pers/dy' refers to spending per person per day; this row is multiplied by 84,366 (28,122 attendees and/or participants multiplied by an average stay of 3 days) 2000 Commonwealth Games of Virginia Estimated Economic Impact Statistics Roanoke Valley On Site Expenditures Direct Visitor Expenditures A. Number of athletes that stayed overnight 5,494 B. Number of spectators that stayed overnight 10,988 (1:2 ratio) C. Average length of stay 2.18 D. Estimated average daily expenditures $112.50 E. Number of day athletes 3,880 F. Number of day spectators 7,760 (1:2 ratio) G. Total Number of Athletes 9374 (A+E) H. Number of attendees 18,748 (1:2 ratio) 1. Total Number of Attendees 28,122 (G+H) Members of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Mr. Hodge I am Ray Cobb, President of the Board of Directors of the LOA Area Agency on Aging and I am a Roanoke County resident. • First, thank you for your continued fiinding during this last year • County funds are vital to the services the LOA provides for older residents of Roanoke County • Last year we provided over $256,000 in services to 2436 older County residents, 176 of whom received meals on wheels. The remaining 2260 older County residents received various services including meals in a congregate setting, transportation to the doctor and prescription medication assistance. • The biggest increase we see year to year is those who are homebound and who can neither prepare nor have anyone else available to prepare a hot noon meal. ~,, For example, we provided Meals on Wheels to 151 County residents in 1999, and 176 in 2000, an increase of 25 people This may not sound like much of an increase, but this type of increase is true over the entire Fifth Planning District and the increase is continuing this year. Moreover these 25 new people mean more volunteers to deliver the meals, and of course, higher meals costs over the entue year. • Over 90% of those who receive Meals on Wheels have yearly income less than $6000. This means that the home delivered meal is crucial. • We pride ourselves on working with other agencies to provide overall services to help older persons remain at home as long as possible • Of course we hope that you will increase the County allocation. We have requested $25,980 which totals $1.50 per County resident 60 and over. County funds are used for direct services, but we also use local government money to match federal and state dollars, so the money you contribute leverages additional dollars, which are used for the benefit of local citizens. • Barring an increase, we hope that you will at least hold the line at our current - allocation of $13,750. Again, thank you for funding us last year and for hearing our request tonight. $10 LUNCH on the LAW N FRIDAY, ,1UNE 8 • 11:00 A.M. TO 'I :30 P.M. NEXT TO THE LOA CENTRAL OFFICE • 706 CAMPBELLAVE, SW, ROANOKE Each ticket will purchase one week of Meals~n-Wheels for one person. -- MENU - - Gourmet Chicken Snlnd with Bread Pasta Salad -Fresh Fruit in Season Assorted Chips -Chocolate Brownie Assorted Beverages with Souvenir Cup ENTERTAINMENT PROVIdEd by DJ lOl STEVE BROOkSI $10 ~ FoR MORE wFORMAnoN cau. (540) 345-0451 ------------------------------------------------------- LUNCH ON THE LAWN TICKET ORDER FORM Please send me tickets at $10 each. Total amount enclosed $ Name Address City/State/Zip Daytime Phone (please check one) ^ I'll join you at LOA on June 8. ^ Free delivery (5 meal min. Orders must be received by June 1.- At time of delivery everyone must present their ticket in order to receive a meal.) deliver to: Between and ^ Take Out (11 a.m. to 1:30 p.m.) I would further like to support Meals-on-Wheels with a donation. Enclosed is my check for $ _ Make checks payable to "Lunch on the Lawn"and send to LOA, P.O. Box 14205, Roanoke, VA 24038-4205. Blue Ridge Behavioral Healthcare Roanoke County Board of Supervisors March 13, 2001 Good evening, I'm Jim Sikkema, Executive Director of Blue Ridge Behavioral Healthcare. I'm here tonight on behalf of the Blue Ridge Board of Directors. You have already received our funding request and I hope a compelling justification. I will be glad to address any questions you may have regarding our request. While I have your ear I wanted to let you know how much I appreciate the board members who you have chosen to represent the County on the Blue Ridge Board. It is not an easy board to be on. We are a very large and complex system of care and our board plays a major role in all that it does. This constitutes a major commitment. They represent the interests of the Citizens of Roanoke County as we manage our funds, plan for the future and assure that the mental health, mental retardation and substance abuse services we provide are of the highest quality possible. As the Chief Executive Officer of Blue Ridge Behavioral Healthcare, I thank you for your appointments of Rita Gliniecki, Roger Laplace, and Gary Kelly. They certainly make my job more doable.. and enjoyable. I also want to express to you my appreciation of Elmer Hodge and his senior staff. During this, my first year in this position, he and his staff have made themselves available to us during critical times. With the challenges we all face in the public sector this teamwork and consultation is essential and most valued. I particularly want to express gratitude for John Chambliss who has, for many years, worked hand and glove with me and other county agency heads to assure a coordinated and high quality human services system for the County. Thanks for the opportunity to speak with you this evening. Once again, I will be glad to answer any questions you may have about our funding request. ~ ~ i; I v I F - ~', `I~ ~, 4~ ' ~ ~ ~F,I :~ ~' .' , i ~~ ' ~~ ~ E v~ ~~ , i ~ ~ ~ i; I ,4~ a o ~ i J~ ~, ~~ ~ ' I ~ 'J ~ ~ ~ ti~ ~4 ~P- ir~an of t~1~,B4~ard of S~ that I ma~i~ ~am~tment. !, -a SHE ERN, 1, ~~ ~,/A'~ TO AB q 11 ~ it I # I e i 5 d ~@ r ~ ~ ~~ jnirill be g~ ~ °h ~~I~ree min resent ' The Chi, ns spe~ h~I ion an is~ ~f~tM~ Boarc~~o ~o otherv ~~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~. ° ihl be lim,~ ' ,~ ~~ a press i ~ "~. _ ~ be en' t~tai~~' ed b th .., y ~ Y of i ~~~ , ? ~ ~ A. F - $ $ I ~` f '3 k i ~~I :; ~~ must be ~ ~ ~~qk~d to thy' ~memberl,:~ nit allowel ~ 4 a ~ F ''~ ~ and the di~~nce will i, sty r~~queste to Dave anyl, •' ,, {~ t I `~ ~ 4i ~ t REQUES rs to recognize G/VE MY NA ~' THE GUIDE ~ I~~. It ~mment whethe II decide the tim will enforce the Hof his/her point man. Debate betwee be courtesy at all ti 'statements and/ ~~ , -~ ~. . ~. IF I~fi€ li ;;' Il ~i ~t' F' ~ 1 !' ,!, ~,~, 7 I ~ 9 ; ~ ; ~~, k,, ~ ,, i ~~ ~~T LE~~~3L~!'111'' AND t~ '~~T'O THE CLERK; ~! '~~ ~1 rr , 1 +4 '"V ~3y ~l4i! ~ ~ _ i ~ ~ TG} ~ "t' 5 r.. i• I 9 ,,felt= R ,'. ~;~ t' ~ I t j I I - _, ] i ~~ ,~~ ~-~f~TF~~~'RESEI~?~~T1VE: 1°~' ~ ~ ~/ ;~ ~ ~ ~ v! ~ '~, 3 ~,', ~k i ~i ~ ~~~ ,~ / Ti V F-~`k' 1'~ /~ L7 C> ~ / C~-, j~l J v-- ~~ ~~ ( l/ ,LY. ~ ~i ( ~ ~ } i g ~`~ is , I. ~ ~~ , i ° ~;~ ~` ~,~ i ( ~ 3 ~_ ` r' ~ I ~~ I ,- .~l -~ f~- ~ ,~'s ~ ,~'~ ?~ ~ ~, .3.~ 1 ~ ~ ~ f ; . EIS I ~li= ~ ~~ F ~~ ~ I, ~ ., t` ~ , r e i ~. g r Il~l~~i.~!#i~iiltlfiilin ~i ~i~~z f ~ ~~Ilil~~wi~i(i~i ! I' . ~~~~ €~-;t ~~~~ ?III' i 14 E };. '~ ~` ~ ~, ~~` '' ~ ~ ~ I 2 'Z I ~~ ' s~ i } ~~ ! f i k i ~n z i ~ I I, ri ~ ~ ~ Y iII ~ ~ 1 ~~ ] , i !,, ~ i a~ ~' ~t~ ;i ~, ND/ U OM HU ., . . ~w ~ .,: ~~ ~~. I r . - ~: f ~, ~ ~. ;, ~ FOCI C ! L AGENG I ~ ~ ~ ~: ~ , I ~=n ` i~ I~` ~' ~lil` ( i i $ia ~„ r,~ i ~ S ~ r : _i r I I' i a: AR E UES ~ x'~ , '~' a ;i - - E ~', . 3 ~ ~Ijk ,ti :~14' i °~ ! k P << ~~'~~! I x {. h" -~ ha~rman oft ~ , ;~ ~~ I,of Su ~' ~ ,, ~~,to recognize m,e i~~ pn _ '~~~~ ~o tk~at I may'~~~ ~ .ht. ~ ~ ~~~~ ;~ ; r ~~ . t. ~ ~ ~ ~-N ins l I ~ ~ ~ ~i¢, , r - ,~,, e,, I ~, ~; , ',f ; ~rs z' r. THE I N 1 ~ E MY NAM ~~ ~i ~ ~ ~ i ~ i ~' ~f E= ~ ~ ~~ ,~~ I ,I ,. ~ I I ~~~ ; ~ } iii !~_i ~~n ~ ~ il. I i~ ~~ is ,~I-~. ~ t ~ ;§ ~ ~ , ; ~ ~ ;. i 4. ~, fi ~~~, ~~ ;' ~~ i Ix3~ ~~ .~ rrvill be iv ~ minu m nt wh e ethers k ~, ~~ ~ ~~ g ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~~ ~. u~l~~-`~'presentat~y~~., ~i Chai '~ ecide the time ! ~~ ~ ~ , ~' , ,~~,: ~~t~z~ns spe~IK~I~~~~ ` n iss j ', I1 enforce the r1~ ~ ~y ~~'r ~~ ~f fihe Board tt~~~!~b herwi ,, I i ~ 1~ ~ ; , ff ~~ jar Inrill be lirn~t~d ,~ '~rese ~` ~ " ~,; ~is/her point ofv' ~~# r . ~ i i ¢: I ~~~t~ ma be entrvi~~4~~ ~ the ~ .~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ t ~ ~~ ° , ~ I i ~ E '' t ~ r. i a ~~nts must be d~~~~ tp the ~~~ ~'~~bate between; ~ r, ~~~hee member$ i~ t~~t~~ll~owed ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~' s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ag' ~ ~ '~ ~~~ '~ I i~ rs and the •~~ e ~ ~~®~ will e ~~ ~~ ~'~w~i~t ~ ~~ urtes at all tirri ~ ~~ ~~ b ~ f p. . Y F ~' ~ ~I ~~ ~~~~'~ ' " ~~ ire ne ueste W ~L~ an t .t ~tements and r ~ ~ ~, ~ i ' I~' ' q d~,~ ~ y '~~ /o ' ~tl~~ hoard. I ~ ~ ! I~ "` ' III ~~~~°~~ i' ~ ~, ii i6 ! ` i }', LL{' T LE D w' H E L ~~ G ~'~"~~~ C ERK' ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ p` ~c i ! ~ ~~ ~~'~iEf~RESEN'l"~r~`['V~. '~/, ~ v~ fi~~ ~ ~: ,~ pp j A ~) 1 4 ~ r i f ~ I ~ F -/ .t: I '! I . f' ~ ~ G1C PR. ~ ~r :~ II ~ , C ~~ it IA ~ ' (`'-~-~` 1 'i ! ,i x _ r ~ ,~ 2 ~ ~ ~~ , i -~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t I, ~, k ~ „ , qq ~a I 5 i •'. 5 P ~` ~ ]. . 1 1 i . 4 r ~jl IFIG k ~ I', 9 ~ 1 i ;. a ~ ~ I ~ ~i, ~ II ; ~ ,I~ 'r ~ ! ; '~ i i i s ~~ ND/NG RE UES ~ ~ ~ FROM HUMA ~~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ , ~~~' ;~~ ~ i~~ ~~, OC/AL AND CUL RAL AGENC/ ~ I ~~ i ~~~ I ' i I ~ ~~ ,`, 6 P ''; APPEARANC : REQUEST 'Ia, !,~ ', ~ ~~ :~ an of the Board of Sue ' rs to reco nize me ~ In II h .~~~hat I may comment. ~I~ ~~I ~, 1 ,''' , I ~I ,~ ~ ~ ~; ~ ~ ~~ THE LECTERN / Wl `~ GIVE MY NAME . I AGREE TO ABIDE THE GU/DELIN ' .E i I ~! ~ ~I I~ I~ ~~ ~" ~ i ~ yTrill be given three minutes 'comment whether sp kii g ~~ resentative. The Chairm n f' ill decide the time li ~~ ~~ I ~~ V,i i~ ~ns speaking on an issue,' '~ will enforce the rule ~~ n1~ s ~~ N ~ ~~ ;, ~~ ~ the Board to do otherwise. ~ ~ i ~ III ~ ~ I'' ~II be limited to a resentat` ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ ~ of his/her point of vie a, I .'~ '~~ be entertained by the Cf~ ,man. ~ i '! ~ ~ ~ ~!'i ~,~ II-hust be directed to the Bo r ~w Debate between a r d n' ~ I ~' '~ ~, members is not allowed. ~ ~!~ ~~! ~' `~ ~ ~~ ~ ' I i ~' ' ~ ~ end the audience will exer ire courtesy at all time II,' ~' ~~ ~, ~ I;,~i ~~ ' I ! i I ;~ quested to leave any writ ~ statements and/or c ~ ~~~i ~~`~ ;~ard. I ~ ~ ~ ' I ;~ ~ i ~ I ~ ~i I,~~'~IT LEGIBLY AND GIV~ !~'O THE CLERK T I~ ~ ~ ~ '~I a ~ " ii ~ ~ ~ J '~,I _----, ~ ~I ~?RESENTATIVE: /~ '~ ~~ ,, ~~ ~ ~, ~, __ ~ ~ ~ III ' k I ', I ;, I, I~ I ', j, II ~ ~ ~ + I ~ Il ;~, ,I i ~: '~ ~ ~' ~'I~ (~ i~~ II ieui I ~li~ I ~ I ~ iii~u~~ ~ ~ i ~ j~l~ ~ ~ tl 4 ~ i ~ ~~ ~ ~~ '' '~ ~ 1 I ~~ ,'~ ~~, ~ ~ ~~~ , Iii 9 , ~ ~~ I ~ '~, ~ I; R -. t. ~di~ I i ~ I y.; ~~ y UND/NG RE U I'~"S FROM HUMAN .g,~ ~, SOCIAL AND C ~ i't'URAL AGENCIES I, I,,i ~I,l , ~, I !, I J : ii ~i ,. ,~ I ~ I t ~~~ APPEARA ~ REQUEST I'll 11, II, n n ~ ,,' P ~' ~I ~I ~irman of the Board of Su ~r~isors to recognize me during i~~.c~~ 'I-~ that I may comment. ~; ~ ~ ~ : ~ , , ~~ I~ I! i' ~i ~~'~ i!G ,, tr O THE LECTERN / / L G/VE MY NAME AND D ~' 4 ~, ~ , T~ 3 ~D. /AGREE TO ABI jE',BY THE GUIDELINES L/ E j ~ ~! ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ,: ~ f r ~I I ~ I , ! ' ejr will be given three mina ~''s ~o comment whether speakin ~ s ~I ,i~ ~~ ~~ ~' i~ li ~~ ~ 'e resentative. The Chai ~n will decide the time Limit ba a ~' p sl e I 8E ~~. i, i~izens speaking on an iss , end will enforce the rule unles i ~ ~Y ( , r t~f the Board to do otherwi ~. ~ '~ I' ~' "i ~ I i i r lwill be limited to a rese ~~tion of his/her oint of view onl Q I o ~ i ~' ~~ p p i ', ~ I it ,~ shay be entertained by the h~irman. 'I i ~ ; ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I, ~,~~ ~ ~ II~Ej ` t~ must be directed to the pa'!rd. Debate between a recogn ~ d ~ !~i'I members is not allowed ~ I'I II f; i~~ I I ~ J ~~ I~ ~'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ F~ ' r`s and the audience will e er ise courtes at all times. II III ~'~ ' ~! y i~ ~ j a I,~ ! s i ii ~ ' ~ '~ re nested to leave an ri ' n t t ment n ~ ~~ tte sae sa dor m tl / com e q Y ~ ~~ I- ~'~ E3oard. f ~~ , ~C _, ~~ , ~i ~ ~ I I s I k if ~I i 1 r, . ~; DINT LEGIBLY AND 1, ~ TO THE CLERK TO TH r 1 C ~ i1 ~ ~: ~~ it ~j~L~~.i ~~~ ~ ,~ ~~~z ~ ~~~~~~ I I ; ~ ' 4 ,~ ' I I!~ ~ ', I'I I ' PRESENTATIVE: ~~^`ii ~~a~~~ ~~ ' ~' I ',~~ i' ~~ °, ~ .~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ .~ ~'l ~ ~C~ ~©l<c ~ v~ ,~~v III ~ i i L~ ~~I I~ ~ ~ : ~ ~ l ~~ i~ ~ ~ 'I ,~ ~, I ' ', a~, I ' ~', ~ , # ~~~,~ ~~ I~~ ~, , If j s ~, r i i t ~~,i~l i~l~ ,~ (~~i I I ~i ~Ji{~~dl~i's~ i.. ~~ I~~ii I ~I~~ i! ~ ii i it ~ ', (I y k ~ ~ ,~ i I Ali ''' • ~ i ~ it ~ i Ii I' d I ~e,~~~ ~1 1 ~ li ', ~~ ' ~ ~ ~ r~' I ',~I a III ~i 1 ~ , =I ,, ~ I k a ~ ND/NG RE UE FROM HUM ~~ ~~j ~ '~',' ~ ~ "' Ifl ~ li +~ ~' ' OC/AL AND CU RAL AGENC/ ~ i ~ ~ 7~~ ~I'~ ~ 71i -5~. ~ ~ ,' r 3 ~d I~ 16 ~ i i I I'. ~ ~. '~' II,~I ~+119 t 1 i I ~ ~; ~ ;~~ E ; 'i PPEARAN REQUE x t, ,F ~ i~ ~~ ~r'rhan o ~ a Board of Sup~r;~ sors to reco e me ~~ that I ma ~`~ omment. ' ~~ ~ ~~ ,~~,,~ ~ THE LE , RN / G/V Y NAM ~ E '~ , ,E~!,. /AGREE ~ AB/D , I, Y GU/DEL/ ~` ~~~ ;, ~I ~~ill be iven three mi ~ ~ ~ omment whether s i~;ll g ~ i' resentative. The h 'Il i '~ ~ ~ p C a wi dec de the time I ~ ohs speaking on an issu nd will enforce the rul ~~ ~ ' ~ ~''I the Board to do otherwi ~II ~ i it ba ~~~ 1 s.dn^~';~j.~ ~~~ `. ~~~ ~ ~;' ~;L~ be limited to a pres t tl ~ f his/her point of v ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ be entertained by hl~'ir n. !~, a ,~~~ 3 +I I ~ ~ m',ust be directed he Bc~~~,rld. D .ate between a ~ ~!''~~ I ~ ~r~~embers is not wed. '~, ~ ~I, ~ ~ iii t~ 1~~ ~~ a ~ '~~ I j I'' I J ~` ~~~ ~ '~ , ~~'~ r~~ end the audi e will ex~r~~se court , at all tim ~~~~ f ~. ~ ~,, ~ ~ ~ requested t eave any writt~n statemen nd/or a ~- ~ .k ,.~ ~ i '.II ~1 ;: ( ~ ; i~ a ~ k: ~ f T L IBLY AND G1 ~~TO THE CLER Eq~, ~ ~u ~ `~~ ~ ~ ,:a ~i~I s~ ~ ~' ii, ~ .1 ,P SENTATIVE~ ~/'. ;~ .~~ ~._ j/ ' J1 r ~ ~ '1 $ : 5 i ~ I ,i ~~ I ~' ~ ~ i ', i ~I i d ~, 7 a 1* i ~ ?~I '~ ~~ :{ 1 `~ i ~,I ~~'I I'_ i ~,i; ~ ~ I ~: i ~ ~' ~ I ;' ~L ~i 1-- Ili E L yk9 I S. q~~ ,,. I I II 'i p~+ +'Y' EId ~.. i ~ .-r~ a I; I i i S~7 ~ ''.. p f Z ~' cl '~ Ik ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ UNDING RE UES FROM HU .~ II ~' ~` ~~ ~' ~ ~ ~ r~ ; , ~ ' OC/AL AND CUL I AL AGENC' ~ j ~ ~ ~ it al a j i i I ~~ F'~ ~ YA. I 31 { ~ I it i~r~~ ~~,~ ~ , , I ~ ~ ~ APPEARANC ~tEQUES ,a ~ ~ a ~~ ~, 11 ~ I ~ i ~ ~ I!I I ~ h~i~rman of the Board of Supe rs to recognize m"~ '~` i s~b!that I may comment. ~ ~~ ~'I~II' II ~~ ~ i ~~ ~I "' ~ 7"O THE LECTERN, 1 WI t3/ VE MY NAM Q D. /AGREE TO ABIDE THE GU/DEL i ~ ~ ~ t ~ I ~~ ~ ~ I ~ ~~ 9 ~ ~ i ~'j i, ,~/ k r will be iven three minutes w 'comment whether) ~~_ I i g ~ '' ~ ~' I' i I ~ presentative. The Chairm ill) decide the time !~ III ~ ~~ I s ; ~ c i ens speaking on an issue, will enforce the rl I ~ ~ i the Board to do otherwise. ~ ~ i ~1~~~ ;~ ~ r~~vill be limited to a presentati' of his/her point ofd ~~, a i ,~ ~z ~ ~ ' ~ ~t~~y be entertained by the Chi an. tp ~ ; ~i ,, i ~ . ' ~ ifD ~ y i I ~1 ,~ ~~ ' ~~ ~ ~ Int~must be directed to the Boa'~~~ Debate between~~ '' I I c~'members is not allowed. ~I 1~~'~' ` ~I '' II ~ ~a a;~ i ~I i~ ~1'~ ~ ~cel^~ and the audience will exer~i~~ courtesy at all ti t~', t ~, ; ~ ~ ' II ; ~ r ;requested to leave any writtr~ statements and/off ~~~~ ~ ~~~~, bard. ,~ ~~r III>j ~,!~ ! I ~, ~ ~ ,. I t .~ ~± NT LEGIBLY AND GIV 4 THE CLERK ;_9 ~ . ~ ~ I I g _ I j ~ SS r.. L ~~ ~ ~~~~ ~ I I ~~,I _Y_~W_~~ II ~ i~ I~' REPRESENTATIVE: i ~, ~ _~~~I }} kks ~ a ~s~.~II 1}.~~ ~~; I :; ' ~ rll I a ~ ~ r _~~ I~ sIr ~ , ~ II ~', i l i k ~~ i I pll '' f I I IZlflll~ ll I ~Il~l~~~~liii ~, i I i I I . I ~ i„i ~ ~ ~, '~ III ~I ~ `~ !il j E ' ~'' : I ' i 4 ~ I ~ ~ ~ it it 7 i ~ D ~ ~~. ~`; all II fI ~I li ' ill I ~ ~ I II III ~~~ III. I i~ I I I II' ~IIII ~'~ II i ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ a ~ ~, ~ i! I ~ . ,i 1 ~ , I i~ j. 1 I I '~ ~I 4 r ~i~ I i Ijl I I E ~ II~Ii~ ~, ~~ I ~ I III ~ ` 'i ~I 4.11 1 i i I ~i '~ ' I I !, I Ili I~ ~~:II ~~ ~ LI I i~iil VD/N~G REQUE ~cia~. aND cut APP~EARANI F n of the Board of SupE ~ t I may'comment. ', ~ I I~ '1"HE L~CTERN, / W . / AG/tEE TO aB/D ~ I~ i f be given three minute sentatitie. The Chairn s speaking on an issue Board!to do otherwisF i Ali be limited to a present e entertained by the C st be directed to the Bc ~~ tubers i5 not allowed. ',,i~r~d the a'~dience will exE ~, II, nested to leave any wr I;I ~~ ~I I LEGI~3LY AND G i ~~ ~ 6 /~ i ESENT,I~TIVE: _~~ I~~ ~- ~. c /l QUES recognize r MY l Gvi, ~ment whethe decide the tim II enforce the point bate between rtesy at all ~ments anc HE CLERK ~~~~~ ~~ ~~~ ,~R ~a i ca q¢,,~,, 11 '.i` i,& S e; ,:~ ~~ ~~ #~'~' ,.~~~I ~. ~~ ~'~I~ ~ , ~ ~a~F~~j~~ f ~ ~ is ~.~ I` ~~ f ~ ~~ F I =I ~ ` , ', i I 1 B 7p !1 ~ '~ ~ ~~i i v, !I Il~~ii~ ~~~ll y ,~ '~i f ;~ ~,: ~I~~' E al,li ~~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~~. i ~,r~. ~ I f'~~~, `~ ~ ~ ~ " ~ f ~. t l 1 { ~^~ ~ ` ' ~ I t i ~ ~~' ~ ~ i~ ~ Y. ~ K ~ k ~ NDING RE UE ~ IiIFROM HUMAN },, .. ii 1 ~ ~. ~~ ` ~' ' C~CIAL AND CU ~ ~ ~~ ~ L AGENCIES ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ !i~ - I. ~. ~ ? 4 ,. d i ;, a n ~~ I 1 ~ F - ~ ~~,' ~ . ~~ ~ -APPEARAN ~~~~EQUEST ~~~ a .V~. - .. '. - ~ 1 i . 4 -i' ~ . t ~~~ ~, ~i~1}~~n of the Board of Sup~i~~~~~r~ to recognize me duri ~~~~r~i~~~iing on ' ~~~ ~`~, ~ ~t~r~'~Niat I ma comment. ` ~ ~ °~ y ~, ~. =:~ ~ , n ~ ,; ,^, ~' r ~ i THE LECTERN, / ~ ~ ail VE MY NAME AN E ,,, ~' ~ ~ ~' ~ /AGREE TO AB/~ , ~ ~"HE GU/DELINE$ ~ : r ~ ` ~,i~;" I ' °; i ~ ~ ;~ ~: ~''.i s r ~. ~ > ~~ ,, n~ S.. ~~ , ~~ 4:~:' d ~~ ~ ~ ~ k` id{ be even three i q.l~ g m nuts ~ ~ ~oirnment whether s ea =„ ~ ,, a ~! p ~ ,: ~ ~ ~~ _~ ~ ~ ~~ t' ~esentative. The Chair i~N-till decide the time limit ,, ~~. F ~~~ ins speaking on an issue ~~r~~ will enforce the rule un~ ~ ~d by ~~~~~~ ~f~~ Board to do otherwise. `~ a ~ ~ '' ~, i ~ '~ ~ , Y ~ ~c~, t~~i I~~ be limited to a presents iar~ of his/her point of view d ` `. ~ ' ~ ~s of ~ ~y '~t,x ~ IO~t, ~ ±t ~ ~~,~, ~, t ~~r be entertained by the ~rai~rn~n. ~ ~ ? , ~- y _ I ~,, ~ ', r 9 i l! 92G1 ~ ~ k ~~ ~ ~ ust be directed to the Ba'ard. Debate between a recd ~I,; ` ~I~er t' ~i ~;i ~ ; . ~~~ ~= er'nbers is not allowed. i c,t , ~~,, ,,; ~ ~~e i {' '',,~~'~ ~` ~, ~ ti ~ h ~t l '~~I~s~e~lr~rs~~nd the audience will ex~rcige courtesy at all times. ' ~ ~' . ~~ ~ ~ kr~ r~~uested to leave any written statements and/or comr~~r~t~,~wu~ ~ ~ tl~+~ ~o~rd. ,. :: a ,. ~ ~ A ~ i s y: 4,fN ~~ ~ ~ ~'a , ~ M `'~"' LEGIBLY AND GI , ~ ~~ ~ ~ THE CLERK TO t ~ _ ;t' `' ~ ~`` t~ ~~:~ ~~ r ' ~E'~b~ ~I~EI~I~~SENTATIVE: ~~UJ ~lJ ~~ ~,r (}..( ~' ~~4 ~ ~~ ,; .~~'~,( ~' p ~~ ~ 5 S ,' ~~J ~~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ! ;'~ .~~ ~_LII~II I~~.Y ~~ th i ii: L AND -PPEARAN of the Board of Su may comment. /E LECTERN, / AGREE TO ABJ ~e given three minute '!f' entative. The Chair~n ~ ', speaking on an issui~, ~ 3oard to do otherwi~'e~~ , ~, ~ ~~'~'~ ,, , I limited to a presen', ~ `~~II ~'~~ entertained by the i ;I'~11_ be directed to the Ro '~ hers is not allowed ~' ~ _~ ~' 'i~~ ~ ; '',i I the audience will ek~e~'' ~;~' ~:~ ~sted to leave any ~nrri~~ ~I ~'~ EN QUEST recognize me C MY NAME ~! E GU/DEL/N ment whether spy lecide the time lin enforce the rule! is/her point of vie bate between a urtesy at all times Cements and/or co ~.EGIBLY AND G1~/~~'1~I' HE CLERK ~~ I ..~ ~~ ~~ENTATIVE: l~ c~ ~' ~~ • i/-'la7l'~~ ews i / ~~sc `I V aNo~-e 5'g ~- O~~d ;, ~~ ~' :,, ~I ~:I ~~ i' 4 i. I~~_l~ I,~ .~{ail ~f ~~ ~L~ v APPEARAI~C ~~~91~ i '~~~~ !li (i', ~ ~ , ~. ~ ~~I ~3:~, ~ ~' ~~,~ ~. ~a ~~ ~,k ~, ~, ~ ~~ ~. I. E ~ ~~ I F'' OM HUMA ~ Y ~i4L AGENCIE I''i ~ REQUEST '~ s ~~ rs to recognize me du'~~ 'EVE MY NAME AI ~`'HE GU/DEL/NE, ~rr~ment whether spe ill decide the time limi ~~ will enforce the rule e oar o 0 o erwi e., l; ~~ ; ;;, ia„ I i ~ ~~ I i ~ ill be limited to a prese tat I~ pf Mislher point of vievN ~ ~' y be entertained by the Cf~ I i~nhan. ~~ ~` n ~~ I4ti ~; ~ ust be directed to the o~~l ~ ! Debate between a re embers is not allowed ~ ~~~ i ~ ~ 'and the audience will e er ' c0urtes at all time . ~ ~i y s ,, equested to leave any ritt~ + statements and/or core ~i man of the Board of Su er± >'that I may comment. O THE LECTERN, / / . /AGREE TO AB/ ~~ rvWill be given three minu esl ;presentative. The Chai m~ i ens speaking on an iss e, !, ~ th B d t d th ' LEGIBLY AND RESENTATIVE: I C~~~ ~I! , r E~" I f `~ I~ 1 k~~ ~} ~., I ~1 .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - l ~ ~ r 1~ + 3j e Y ~ ~~ ~ I~ ~ `j E i fir I~ n~2 {' ~ ~ S ~'. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I~V ~~' I t ~ I n. 4 obi I '} .F r ~~~ ~ u ~ b •~ ~ ii c ;r ~~ ~~ ~ ~~a r~ I "~~ r. ~ I f I E' ~' S ~ r ~'. R E ' i~ H _~ I jj i ,` i (e ~ + tt P d ~~~ ~~ rR~R.~ AP!PEARAI~ ~tEQUES'~" i~ ~ ,~~ ~ ~~ :~ ;~ ;: Ih99 ( ~ U~ ~ ~ ~ e# t~ ill ~., 1 ~f i~ S iii ~ ~ h;airman of the Board of Su~e'~vi~Qrs to recognize m~e' ~ ~ ~~, I ' i~~~ ~~ ,, ~, 1-,so that I may comment. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~; ~ ~~ ~;~. ~ ;,:; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ® 4i ~~ ~ ~ ~I k rr ~ I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '. '. ~~~~~'I I ~ I f I I ~ ~ t' TO THE LECTERN ! !i(~/VE MY NAM ~ ~: ~'~I I ,. i; ' ~ ''' _. i ~. ~~l2D. / A ~ REE TO AB/ ~~ G ~~ THE G UlDEL ~~, ,~ i~ , ; ~' ' ' ~ ~ ~~ ti,' ~,~ 6 I ~~ ~ ~I ~ I ;' ~ f ~~~~ ~`.~ I t +- r' I ~ ~ ~a E ~~r ~ ,~ ~ c { ~, ; ~ ~" ~'~ leer will be given three mmu~~~ ~tq~ ~pmment whether ~sl ~ ~ ~ ~ ;' I ~~ ~ . ~~'~ ~Ir,represent~tive. The Chai~,~~~~ ~vrr~ll decide the time I'~~~~ at;,~~ I~ i ~ `b ~i~~~tizens s e'akin on an isst~~' d (will enforce the r li ~ ~ ~' ~' ~ W ~ b 1, ~ p 9 Y 1~r ~ Hof the Board to do otherwier, d ~ ~ ;~~ ~d' ~~ ~ t ~~ ~ it ~ i I 1 ~~ a er will be limited to a re i I'~ ~' set ~ bf his/her int f ~ 0 0 w' f ~~~ ~~G~tic~n may be entertained by the~~ ~~ ~' hairrrian. ' '§ ' ~ ~ `s` I ~j I~ ~ ~~~! r'T`~~. ~~ I' I M. ' rn „nfs must be' t ~ ~ direc ed to th '' r ~, H e ~ a ~. Debate between a ~'~ ~~.~di~nc~e members is not allowed ~~' !, '~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ro ' ~ ~' '~ '~ ~ ~'~;~~ ~ ~ ~- ~, ~' ~, ~; ; I J ~ ~~~~C~rs and the, audience will e~c~~ci~~ courtesy at all tirrtgtk !$ " ~ ~ ~ ; r ti ~~ i ~ ~~s~~lre requested to leave any vb~itten etatements and/or d~," t,~ ' ~~1i~°F ~ ~~ ~; ! ~f~~ Board. ~ `~ f ~ ~ ~~~ r' ' T ~ j,i I. s' . ~ }~ dA , ~','~ ~ MINT LEGIBLY AND G~ ~~ "1'~!~h THE CLERK ~ ,' , I ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~' ~ '~ .r.f;~ ~~ i ~ 1 '~~ ~ , r, `~ ~I~!OF REPRESENTATIVE: ~~ ~_~~~1 ~ C~~~ 1~~ ~k I II ~ „' ~,a~. I . ~ ~ '~ r fs,_~ ., t: =~ ~ I r iS ,~. I ~ ~ ~': y ~ n ,~$ ~ , ~ ~. I 1 p~ Ik ji5! ~' ~ ~ ~... ~~ ~~ 3~ n ~ s I i , ~I ry : i € ~ ~' . 0 y ~~'~. ~ i '~., ~., ~,.~ ---.._ __.._ 1iL~1 ~ ` _~ I~~~~~Yiflf~la iai~0i~,'~h~li~u4 G3 r I i ~ ~ ~ 4' I, Iii ~ ~ i ~' i I ~ ; ~ ~ ~ i I; f I; ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ i i ~ {'' ~ ~~ I ,I~ ~ I' '~~ '~ ~ ~i ~' ~ ~ k ~ ~ ~' ~' ' ~'~', ~ ~ UND/NG RE UES S FROM HUMAN i ~ ,~ " ~~ ,~ ~ ~"'~~ ~ ' ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ' ~ SOCIAL AND CUL ~U AL AGENCIES ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ r I ~.~ ~; t ~ r ~~ ~ 'F' i ~ ~ i -, ;~{ !~'$ ~!, ~ ; APPEARANC,'E REQUEST ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ; '''! ~ 6 ! i ~I I i ~ ~~Gh~irman of the Board of Superlvis ~ rs to recognize me duri ~ g'th ~: r~' ~, ~t~r s~~~o that I may .comment. ~ I `: i i ~I, TO THE LECTERN, i W/ L G/VE MY NAME AN SID ~`~jRD. /AGREE TO ABID 8 THE GUIDELINES IS 5 ~~ I ~ ' ~~ i ~ I iii ,~( I ~ i U ~~ ', ~ ~ ~- , ~ '~ ~ ~ a~l~~r will be given three minutes'to omment whether spea{~ing a ~ ~ „~,., ~ , I o~ representative. The Chairm n ill decide the time limit ase i ~ ~ ~ ;. tf citizens speaking on an issue, Iran 'will enforce the rule un ess i t by, '~ ~! " j '~ ~it~ of the Board to do otherwise. ~~ ~ ~ I~ ~ i" ~~ ~ ~' ' ~~ ket~ will be limited to a presentat on of his/her point of view nly, o ,~l ~, 1 ~~ w; '~ t' n nay be entertained by the Cf~air an. j'~, ~.~ ~ E,,',I er~~s must be directed to the Board. Debate between a rec gniz ~ r,,' ~ ~~ ; i nee members is not allowed. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, e ~ ; ~;~,~ E; '~ ~ ak~rs and the audience will exencis courtesy at all times. j ~ I '~I j ~„ '~~~ , ~ r a,re requested to leave any writ~en, statements and/or comments ~ ~;1 ~ '~ ~~~'~ he ~~Board. ~~ ! '~ ~ ~ ~i ` !, ! ' I~~tINT LEGIBLY AND GIV O THE CLERK TOT E i ~~I i ,~ ~ ! I i ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ : i ~ f i i , l~ ~ i i Q ~r I ~~ ~~ ~, ~r' ~ ~ ~ E li ~~ ~' i i ~~ ~ ~ CI, f:l ~!~~~'~~ ~~ ~~ REPRESENTATIVE: ~~.' ~~G~~=1n~.A I '~ ~ ~~~ {, ~ ~ ~ h i~~+i i {i iii I ( i ~ E i ~'~ I ~~~~ ~' w ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~i ~ ~ . g~g i! ~I I ! '~~ ~~ ! - I f~~l!, ! I I , '''~ ~i ~~I ~ 9~ II~L~ ~, ~ ~~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~'~' ~ i I~~ I' ~ 'Ili f„1~1 ~ ~i I ~ ; i ~;, w (` ~ ~ III s qpr li ~~ ~ '. F ~{ i) F ~'i. '~ d~° F $ ~ ]~ I ~ _` 1. i" i : N f , Ip. §~ * '', ~ - ~~~ : h 9 ~ ~, .~~' rd~ ~I }: ~ ~I ~ ~ ~ ~ i I f i ~`~ !!ND/N' UES OM HUMAN ~ ~ I' , ~~ ;' I 7 ~ i I' ~ ~ j ~ ~ ~; ~ i ~~ ~ ~f s I ~. SOC/A~. '~' CUL I L AGENC/E ;° ~ ~ ,~I ; ~ ;~~, ~ I r ~ III ~, i ' ~ ~ ~',` lil r~ E ~ I t ~ 9. ~~ ,li A ~ ~,~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ , ~ . ~~ ' APF~' I~tAN~ ~~I~t~QUEST ~'' '~ ~'` ~~_ ~ ~, I ~~~ F f M ~~' ~ ~~ ~' ~~t~irman of the ~pard', of Super~~sors tb recognize me du ~~ ~ ~I hon ~~ k~e.~ ~ #~~r~'sb that I mayl~~mmsnt. iii ~I ~ ~ ~, p k ~ ~F i ~ ~~~ E~~ ~ t~ i ~ ~~~ i 6 3 ~ ~ ~. I E ~~ , T E TO H L Lf~'N 1 W/' ~ 1' E MY NAME A ,~ D. / AG ,~ Tt~ AB/DE3 ,TIME GUIDELINE ~ ~ :~ ,I . ~ ~', '; ~(E t ~ ~ ~+ I I,~ ~ i ' ~ r ~'~'E ~; ~~~aer will be givj~n ~hre~ minutes, ~;orr~h~ent whether spe i ~ ~~' ~~ ~~ a ~ F ~ ~~'~ ~ ; ~I~~h-epresentati~r~.~ The Chairm~ 111 ~ecide the time limi ~ ~ ~~ ~~ f 'F~i izens s eal~i~ ors ~n issue ~~wi~~ enforce the rule ~ ~~I ~' ~~ ~ b ~ ~ p ~ ~ ~ .~~~ ~ ~ ;. ~-~Ir~it~ i~f the Board tq do dtherwise. ~ ~ ~i I ~i B ~ 4 ' ~~ ~ ~ ( ~ ~ ~ , j-~,. ~, , , ~ `~ ~ ~~ak~r~will be limited to a presentati, ~n 4f h~~s/her point of view ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~fil ~~~ ~~i~r~ rya be entelrtai~hed b the Ch~irman'~~~. ~ i ! ~I ' ! I ~ ~ ~ ~1 ~F ~~ ; ~ ~~ I ~ ~ I I~ ~ ~. ~ : ~~ ~ ~ ~ o` t` must be di~rf~ted ~o the Board. De~~bate between a re ~ ~ lid r ~~ ~ ~~ i ~~ ~, ~ ~ e ~ iii •, i, ~ ~ ', r I' ' N ; III ~~ ~~ier~c members (~ dot allowed. ~ , ~, il! ~ ~'~~ '~' II ~ I' ~ i ~ i ~I ` '~ ~,E;~~e~~e;rs and the audience will exercise codrtesy at all times. , ' ~ ~~ ~ ~~ '~ ~;~ ~-I ~ I`~ ~ j; x ;, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I a ~. j. ~ ' ~ ~ ~ g , ~ I , i ' ! . ,,~~rs ~r~ requested ~t~ leave any written statements and/or co ~~nt~; ~ ~ :f ~a tf1~ ~3oard. ~ E ~ } : ~~ r `' ;t ~ ~ ~, ~. . - i c .. y, I l ~, ~ i ; INT LEG1 AND GIV ~~! ~'HE CLERK TO ,~~, ~ ~ ,~ ,~ ~ i ~ ti I ~~ f :~ ~'. ~ ' ~ ~ ~. ~ ~; i k i, ~~ ~ ~F R~EPRESENI'A~'IVE: '~ ('' ~',ti 1~ ~ l.~(<~ - ~ ~ ~~~ ~: ~~, s ~ ,~ _ s ~~I -, ~ ~ ~' , ~ : d ~~ i ` : ~ ~ i ~ i :~; t ~ ` S ,~~, ~ i ~ ~ i' I , . ~ ~ I Sr 9~ ~ .I~ ~ ~y ~.: ~ ~ : ~ ,-'~ ti~ ~: ~' r ~r E t - i ,~.~r . ~, S ~ a~~ I i ~ ~ ~~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~, i ~ ~ I I ~ ' ~ ; ~ ~t M ij I i~ ~ k r E ~ i~111 "'II~I_. _. __ - ~ ~ 1111 ~ ~ ~ Li. ----. _~I~ Llil l~.ua(1Wl _Y~al nw:u~_~'.. I' ,~ ~ I ~~-~~ h i ~,'Ii t i F I ~~ ~I h I Aj I tF `~~ ~<~ I ~; ~. ~ , I, ~~~f 4nl` ~T 'r 1 .J I~ { , ~ ~~ ,, ~~ Yf ~~ ,~ ~~~ ~i ,,~ h~ ~. *~, li ,~ ', ~~~ i t Z~ i, ~ ~~I ~~? ~' I~t f ~ ~`'~ E ~ l:l I p i 4 ', f~ ~ ~7. i p ~ p: ~~ f p N~'. ~'~ " ~j.' ~~~ ''~ ii ~'~ G h ~~f h ~f ,~ ~~ ~~ i17~ j ., ;I i ~1 . ~i f ~I'Ae ~ ~4,t I ~,~~i F i ~~ ~ ~~ `, ~( ~~~~ ClA ~'' AGENC/ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ,, l.~ I t~ ~ ~ i j f ~ i~ '~ ~' ' ' ~~ ~ 1 ~ fli ~ ii i ~ ~ ~ fit. ~ i 1 fir. ~ ~ 5 : ~ ~ ~ I '~ ~~ ~~r~~~'I APPS ''r~QU EST ? ' ~ r~; ~1~. ~~ . v# ~ I {' r ~r ! ? ' E ~^ ~~~rlr~an of the [~ ~ f ~p ri$or•s to recognize me d~'i ~ ,' `~ ~! ~~n; ~~ ~~, ~~~I'thet I may c~~t't~[~~t. ~ ~ r ~~' s ,~ ~ ,': ~ ; ~ ~~- ; ,, ; '~"HE L ~ ~~ f ~ ~ ' ~f E MY NAME ~` ~~ 4 i ~ I' I"~ i~ `~ l . ~. .~ / AG/r~ ~~' ' ~ ~ GU/DEL/N j ..E C ~... .,,~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ,~ ~ , .~: ~. Vl { ,' ~ Y ~ ~' ` ~~ ~ ~ I .u s : ~ pi I` I +;~ y ~~ ~i ~'~rill be iveria~t' A ~m.inut °t c ment whether s ~ ' ;~~ , r 9 ~ Q p~ p ~ ~ ~ ~ " `"~` ~~ c ~ ~esentativ~~ ;~ '~t~~;jr n.N+rill ~cide the time li d' e~ ~~~~~ hems speakirr ~~ ~ i~~~ , i~ar+idw~~l,enforce the rule ~ ! , ~ ,,, F ,: ~ ~ e ~ , u 3 't j ' ~I~~ he Board td. ~ ~i`Wis . ~, `~ 1 ,~~E~ , ~~ ~ ~ ; grill' ~e limited ~r~~~' r~ ~t ~ ~~~ pf hid/her point of vie ; . ~ ~ ~ "~ ~~` ~ ~' ~R~'~Y'be entert~~i~~{x ~ th Pti~irmarr. ,{ ~ ;, ~ ~ ~ ~` ~ ~ ! ,z~ ~ t f ~! ~ ,I f~ ~ i ~ r Yr ~II l ,t,; i~nwst be dirQOc~~t~;tl7,e Bi~rc~. D~b'ate between a'r~ ~ ~ ~ r' ~~~~mbers is n~# ~~Il+~~nred. ; ~~ ~ ~ , ~ , ~ ~~ ~ ~ R ~]y~' f _ i ' @ ~ k E' ~~t i,7: I t an~~d the audi~r~c~ ~~wFll ex i e ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ;" `' ~' ~ ~~ ~ ~q~u~rtesy at all times ~ 1 x ~~ Q a ~ ,: r~ { ~ N ~, ,requested to ~~~we,~ny wr~~~en sta#ements and/or cod ~ a i ~ ~~ I~ i ~ fI ' ~ i+ ~ i ~ ~ ~ { ~~ '~' LE '~~t , GI 1 E ice' ~' H CLERK T~! ~ s ,i 1 ~~-T rl ~rl ~»-~,~, ~ ~ iii ~ ~~ si ~ t~{ s t. ~ ~ ~~ I ~,i ~~~~~ I~~Pf~ESENT~0.TiV~,: ~~~~ r `,,~~ c= ~~~~-ri.~,e,r ~' ~~''~~i ~ ~~~ ~ ; I`~ ;3 i ~~ ~. ~..~ _ ~ f: ~I ~. q i L ~ Phi ~ 1 i ,II,~k ~ fj kf `~~ V,, ~ ~ yy ~ ~ 4', ` ~t [d~~ ~II~_ , n .~~; ~ ~3~ l6~1~~ I€I~ I III ~ i~i~i illlai~ ~€ ~~ i ,iI Y ~~I~~ ~~ ~ ~®Y i~~ ~~ii'~i~~r . i ; ~:~ i t s it Q 3.e ~~ ~ ~ ~ _~ r. S ~~ _. f 4 ai ` ~ F ~f s ~~ '~i ~ ~~ '. ~ . ,. ~ n }, s_ .a ~ ir; „' ~K' ~ ~', i'~ a, '~ ~ i ~~ i, , h t~ .,~ ~, a~" ~ ' ;' ~ ' ~ ND/NG ` E ~1 ROM HUMAN ~ ~ ~ ~' F r ;~ ~,, ~ „~ ~ '~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~DC/AL ~ ND tJr rl ~AL AGENC/ , ~° ' ~' ~ 3 ~ 6~ ~ ~ , ' ~ ~ ~~ ~~ a E`~~ j `~~ ` APP~~AR~-11~ !,~tEQUEST F ~f~ 3 i G ~." 3 j i I ~ '. '', ~ ', ',, ~~ ~ ; .. i ~~ ~~ ; ~~ ~ r~nan of the Beard of~, Su ielrvi~o~~r~ to reco nize me diurim ~~~tl~' ~`, ~~~ tip on . ~ p. ~ g ! , ~ ~ ~ _ 9 th f ~5d'that I may comment; ~~: ' ~:, _; ~ ~~ THE LEG~~fERN~ I V~/NL,~ ~~,l1/E MY NAME All~t~ ~ ~ ~ . /AGRE~ ~II ~' ~` T4 /~B/' ''~' h'HE , L GU/DEL/N~ L E y5 ' d i ~, I ~ ; ~ E "f ~ '~ ~ ~~''~ I ~ I ~ 'i j ~ ~ , ~3 ~ ~: , •' ~' ~ ~~ I~er gill be given three minutes tq~ comment whether sp~e~C~rl ~~ ~ ,~~ '~ ~ ~~ ~ t b~ representative. The Chairrrrar~'~vil'~I decide the time lit~i~~~ ec~~_t~e b ,, ~~, ~e~~~ d~ti~ns speaking.~on an'issu~ a~ld; uvill enforce the rule jur~lj~, s ittt~~l by a~r~ty a~ the Board to do otherwise. ' '~ ~; ~ ~ • ,~°~~~ # p .' i14er will be limited ~A a presentetian 4f his/her point of viewr anl, . ~~ ~ ~ ids of ; ~, ,~~;~ ~~i -~ ~~ be entertained by,the ~hair~m~n. F • E; ,~ ~~ nts~must be directed to the Bpar~. 'debate between a rec~agize~f'p~~~er ~'' ~ i~t~e!rriembers is not allowed.. ' ,- F' ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ,~ ~ E • ~Ij~ '~ „ „p~~k~rs end the audience will exercise Courtesy at all times; ~' ~~ ' b' • ~` erg are requested to Dave any written statements and/or corri~entsi~~- 3i to tine Board. f ~~j '~. _ j P ~I~~ ~ T LEGIBLI"'~f AND GI'V'E a~'~ THE CLERK T~~' ,~1( I ~' ,~ , h 1 ~ y~ '~ f ~y~~ 1 ~,r k~ ~ ~~ Y i S ~~ S. (,~~~F~EPftESENTATIVE: ~ ~ ~~ ~~yy ~_ 4~ i` ,, t . ,~ s4i i y ; r" ' ;~ , I`• ~ ~F ~ e* i 7- ;. r.~ ~ . ' ~ " .~~ ~ ~ dp ~i ~. 'I ! i. ~ N x p„~ y ~ ,[mac }, oili~~~ II~~i1~~~~1~f~, ~i: ~~sYR I~tI ~f h~~i~~~~'~~'I '~~~~~~ I~t~i~i ~~ii~ 9 { cl.~~~iu~ ~ Idl~lilll. FUND/N!G REQU~ SOCIAL. AND CU AP~EARAh Chairman of the Board of Su aer so that I may comment. :E~ TO THE LjECTERN, I. EC~ORD. I AGREE TO ABI ~ea~ker will be given three mini al pr representat%ve. The Cha of,citizens spearing on an iss ~ri~~y of the Board to do otherw :steer will be limited to a preset tio~h may be entertained by the ~nants must be directed to the tiemce members Is not allowec eskers and the audience will E rs ire requested to leave any thie Board. _x _ E PRINT LEGIELY AND 1 ~F' REPRESENTATIVE: .: 3 ~ .~ ~~ ~_5-- IIFROM HU EQUEST to recognize me d~rrin ~IVE MY NAME A THE GUIDELINE ~mment whether spe ki II decide the time lim b will enforce the rule I~ ~f his/her point of vie pan. Debate between a r courtesy at all times tatements and/or co 1 THE CLERK TO ~~~~ °~ ~{ i5 ~ .~~r ~ ~ ~ ~ L'~ ~~'G r i `r I, ~I II I u'~ ~ i ~ i ~' i''~ I I~~~ I I i ~ 1 I I ' Ii i ~. ~I II' ~' i I II .Y.. { ~: I I ~ 4, I ~ i { i I II. I I I' i y I ICI i i I i i i i I --+. I I i t I i fl i i i ',li ~ ~ [. - I~ I ~- I I i '~ r' I~. 'I I ,. I h t i~ ~ ~ i ~ I ~i ~ ~ fi ' ~~ ~ i 2i i I I ryry~ tE ~~ iii ~ I I X41 I t' I,; , u y ~ ' ~~ ND/N R' U OM HUMAN' , I~, ~ ~~ ~ ~'' II 'I 'I ~ OC/AL II C L AGENCIES ~ I ~ I~ I~ ~ ~ ; r ~ I ~ ~~ 1 i IIr '~ f,' W }. I I ~ ,F~ ~ , I .. ~I~i, ~ - r`' r ~k I ~ ,~^ APP I ~ VEST Q ~ ~~ ~ 3 .$ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ I a ~I E I,~ ~ ,I I ~li I li' ; i I ii, iii man of the E~loa of Su lieo~s~t~ recognize me dui ~, ;~ ~.'f one t ''that I ma c©m~nt. I' I y ~ ~ '~ i `` a9. a X13 Ir r . ii SIG r ~ ~ i a. III;;. ~ ~ '~ I Q THE LET N / ~ E L MY NAME A ~, '' / A GRL~~ ABI X31 ~ E G U/DEL/NES I ,~ i ~ dt- 4 I II ~ II I ~~ + is Ili ~, I i i I~ .~I I' i' I `~ I I rll I" !' f I i i II ~ i'; I 'b i. ill be even h a I, g ~ ~ o ar~j~nent whether spec i I tr i m nu c~ I I ~ I 'resent ti ~ ~' a ve,.l T Chai p ~ h ~M~t decide the time limit 4 ~ '; ~' ens speakin~ o I l,~an iss n~ ~iM!1' enforce the rule u I ~ ~ b~' ~~ I~ I ~, the Board to Ildo 'therwi ' ~ '~ I ~' , !: ',~ ~I ,~ II ~ I „~F~ i~ I a ~ '. ~~ fay- E t s Ii f • il'I b I' ~ ~ e united to ~ re en I `; p ~ n'I ~ I'i~s/her point of view ~ ~f ~I, I~ i be enterta ne b th I ~ ~' I y ~~ y e~ irm~ar~.~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~I- '. ~ i '.~ ', ~ ~I ~ ~ ~ I.I ~~. 4 aka. it ~ II I • I ~~~ ust be direp~tee,,o the di U~bate between a rec i 'Qty ~ ~~ ` ' ,I~ ~ II . i ; embers is not ~I~lowed~ ~~ c ~ i I i I ~~ ..1 ~ n 4 ~ 6 I ~ T i III I ~~ if ~ ~, '' r I II 'I~ +' ~ I • nd I ~~: III ~ the and nc~ will i~ ~ e~ ~~ Ise ~d,~rtesy at all times. ~ I '~ E~i~ ~; ~I;, i ~ ; Ali a uested to lies' ~I an ~ it ~,~ q ~ y Wr n. s~a~~ments and/or comi~~~ I~~~~~~~'~ ~~ ~ I I~ I I ~~ i y ~ I ~ '. ICI B I i I, i'~ i~ J. I I ' ~ ~ I q c I p I I I I Ii E~ ~' ~ ~~I .. ~~ I',. MI I I k I E I I TL E GIB ~1( 4 D I. G I E CLERK TO . ' ,~ ;~ ," ~ I ~ ~' I i~t-.:.'" ~, ' ~ ~ , i r ~ , ~~,~~ k r, li ~ ~, ll i' 4'~I II II ~ //,, p a ,~: /~//~ vl ~ Ju ~ F I ~'+ S~ ,. ~`ix a I, I 7' /~ D~~ I ~ i ~~'~[ 4I C.. I 9~ ~~ Q i RE SENT ~ '~ A I /'~ !~ T V e ~'~ ~ I rl r3 ~ ~ ~~`. o ~ ~ I ~ E:, i - ~. ~ i ~ i 'a ~ ~ i dal ~'~ ©~ ~ M~ u ~ o I, ~. ~o l ~~. V z c,CV Ca - . y:, ~ / ~ .3 ~ , ;~ ,~ ~. ~~ I i .' I' ,~s ~~ I ~I I i ,I. 9 ,, ,/ ,/ I~ ~ ~ ~. ~-f' i r `/' ~' A li I f ~ b r ~~~ ~. ' ~I' ~ l i I I~ E ' ~ ~ I ' I I F ,v r I I, .. I 1 ~I' '~ II i i li I ~j I I @ ~II ~ ~ ~~I ~~~ I. ~ I Il~u~m~ ~~s ~~~~~~ „i i ~,, ~~ ~~ 3 ~ ~si i l ~~, ~ " ~ ~~~ c~ I ;: •' 7 . ~ { + { I r ~~ ~ i t. ' ~. ~"i 1 1 ~ ' ~' s ._i ~ ~ li ~ ~{ ~'r ' FUNDING RE UES OM HUMA` ~ ~~ ~ ~~ { ~ ,~ ~' ~ s~ ~ ~ . ~~ SOCIAL AND CULT '~ ~ «,_ I L AGENCI~ '~ ~ r~' ' ' ~~ t~ ,~, ~ f~ , , ~ ' ~ . c ~ i t~~ ~, s ~ I 1 ~. 'tr ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ APPEARANC~ ~~ ~ ~'`~` ~,; ~ ~EQUEST~ x{ .,'r , ~ i ~ w4` r a~ ,a :. airman of the Board of Supervi~s~ors to recognize me ~~~`! ~ ' g on , ~~o that I ma comment. I ~~ Y r' i i' ~ ' r~ '~ ~.~' E TO THE LECTERN, / W/L I',GlVE MY NAML ' ~ RD. /AGREE TO ABIDE ~~ T'HE GU/DELII~I ~~ ~ ` ~~ ~ ~~ '~ ~~ ,. ~~ ~ ~ i~ ~ , ,t, F ( pl~a~Cer will be given three minutes t~ '',comment whether spe~kk i ~~ " I i j ~ IU~I ar representative. The Chairmanti~ill decide the time li~il~ ~ ' ~ ' ~~ ~ , r~qf citizens speaking on an issue, a~~ will enforce the rule ~ ~''; ~~~ ~ ',~ ~y ~, i s ~ ~ j,'~rity of the Board to do otherwise. ~ ' ~ ~' ° '~~ `' ~~ ~,.:, t }~ iii 1111 I,, ~ { ~ ~ 1 . ', ~~ ~ ~ i ~ak~r will be limited to a presentatio~t~ of his/her point of ~i uwr!~b ~ ~ lit of . ~~ior may be entertained by the Chairman. ~ ~ '~'~ i~ r '. ~I ~ ~ j; a :;I ~ I II ~,~,,e~ts must be directed to the Board,. Debate between a ` ' r ~idiien~ce members is not allowed. ~~ ` ° `' ~ ' ~, ~, ~ ~ .~s;, j ~ ; ~ ~~p,~~k~rs and the audience will exercise courtesy at all time. . IiI ~ ~°~ ;~ ~~~ ~, ~~~~s ire requested to leave any written statements and/or cd~ri"~'! ~: ~o the Board. '' ~ 'a, E ~, 9' I ~ ~ ~~ ~: _, ,~ i i i 6±_ .1 t:` ~ F ,~ ., ~ RINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE'1"O 'S'HE CLERK 71' i ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ { ~ ~{ 1.k i~ ~~ ~ r 1. j,~, ~ ~~ ~ ,r , ~„ r , I ~ ~ ti~,~~~ ,. ~F {REPRESENTATIVE: i -~--e '~ ~~ , i { ~ ~ ~ t ~~ ~ ~ r `. . s _ U ray ~~c~~ '~ S: ~' ~ ~ ~ F r. ~~~ ~~ '~ .t I r{.. t ~ ~~ ~~ : if Ij~~ t. ~~ i ~~: ,. i s ~ ~ _ _ ~ i ~; ~ r ~ I ~, f~ I { ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ^~Lf6~~ i~Lll d41C:I) } ~~ ..; "- ,:' - . .FUNDING E UES ~ ~~' OM HUMAN ,. C/AL ND CUt ,'.R ~ ~~ AGENC/E .; APP~ARAN~I~rQUEST t ~~~ C#~~irrrtan of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me durinc~'the~",h~~'tig on th~~ "~ ~I#ter,~o that I may comment. ~' y .~; ~ a~3~ ~ ~ t '' ; " ;, ~"`O THE LECTERN, / IN1'~~, {GIVE MY NAME AND ~41~ ,, ,,; ~ I AGREL TO AB/D,E~ ~'~'' TM~E GU/DEL/N~S,LjS'll" ,,, ~~ .. ~ 1 5 ~.! , . i f,' • ; ~ ~~i~~e~ker will be given three minutes to comment whether speaking a~4r~ ~ P i_ f' ,iw~l €~~'::representative. The Chairmerl~'f~tll decide the time limit b~~ed,` ;, uT, °. Hof ~i~izens speaking on an issue, and wili enforce the rule .unless iri ~by ~;` ~'na~~iri~rof the Board to do otherwise. ~ ~ '~~~~ `' • ~ ~`~ a~~r wilE be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view on',ly. i ~ of ~: . ~'l~i~o~t nay be entertained by the CheErr~an: ,. ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~I~ rc~cl~f±n~n~s must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognizea~~sr .ate a~~ierrce members is not allowed. '""' • ,~c~ .~p~atcecs and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. • ;.' ~e~rs ice requested to leave any written Statements and/or comments ~b~; ~Gi'~~k to the board. , ~ , t. .~,~ , ... ` 1!~i ~liNT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO'r#i `A~m~NGY: E CLERK TO TI ~i i~i~p ~~ ~~~d r! i ~~, s ~~ ~8d E ~~ ~ i; ,, i , ~ i, Ira ~,; ~~ M ; ,,I, ~; R, ~i ~f •~~ ,~ ~. ~~ '~ ` ~ ~~,~ ~ y i ~~j~ i!!i ~ ~~ f 0 ~~ I~ ! ~ I ~i~ P ~~ IE ~~ ~ I III S I~'~~~s i ~ i, ~ 1~ ~~ I, I! !i gds ~ ~,'~ ~'z' 1 ''~~~ I~ ~ ,~ ~ , ~ ~ i ]'?~ , ' ', ~ ~~ ' ~ '~ ;,~ ~ ~~~ i a i € ~ i ,; N ~ -,~~ t '~~FU DING RE UES t~'' M HUMAN ~_~~ +.' i ~~~ ' ' OCTAL AND CUL R ~ L AGENC/ S` ' ;f 1 ~,~.~, ARANC~, REQUEST i ~ ~ ~ ; '! ' '~~ ' 'irjman of the Board of Superi~i~~~~rs to recognize me quoin ~ ~h ', ~` ~ tih~ ~on ~, ~ 9 ~ ~~~ g ~ r~~, 4 ghat I may comment. I ~, i ', i '~'~ THE LECTERN, / WI lid G~''VE MY NAME ~G111~D ~'~' ~~ J~ ~~. I AGREE TO ABID 1~'HL GU/DEL/N SE L/ ~ 4 ° ' ~~~ r { n a' I. '. ', 'I I ~i i y r i 1 i f it '~~ ~; i I ~~ ~~~~'~ ~r Will be given three minutes~~ ~~~,~cornment whether s~,e~'kin~ ~$~, ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ` ~' ~i ~ ~I~, ~ ~ep,resentative. The Chairm~ i~vill~decide the time lirrniti, base i', ~~ ~ ~''~,, ~ I, ~; ~ ~ze~ns speaking on an issue, ~~ ~~~ rill enforce the rule u~les~ ~rp~ ~ ~' ~~ Eby are i~ ! ~~ ~ ~'~ i , ~ . ~,, t~ f the Board to do otherwise. ~ '~, ~ ~I,~ ~ I';, ~ ~' ~~~ ° 1 „ ~ ~ jrvill be limited to a presentatic~r~ of his/her point of view I,only~. ~~ ,f~, ~~, af, ri ~k~~y be entertained by the Ch(~iir~man. ~,, ~ ~ ~;; ~ ~ ~~' i ~~ c h ` ,, ~~~~ must be directed to the Boa~~. Debate between a ~egogn~z~~ ~,~{~~r ~ni~~ members is not allowed. ~ ~~ i ' ~ i~ ~;~. ~thj ,'al~~rs and the audience will exer~i~e courtesy at all time. !, '~ ,; ~~'~;~-~~ 5 k ~ i I ~ ~ it ~ I ~e ~ arr~, requested to leave any written statements and/or c~mmer~ts ~i~ ~I~- !. ' ~r~ ~th~ ~oa'rd. .~ ~, i ';,. ~'i ' n I E REPRESENTATIVE: . S. ~7 i 1 _ C ~`~-~ ~ ~~ :~ LEGIBLY AND GIVE" "~'O "TH''E CLERK r~, ~ , F its. ~ i, ~, ~' ~ „' ~~ I ~~ II ii~~i~dl'i~~ill l ~E~~~ AP~~ARANI~E4UE h irman of t e oard of S ' ' to recogniz s that I ma mment. ~I ~ TO THE TERN, /, VE MY N~ D. / A R E TO A~ HE GU/D~ r will be gi e three min ' ment whetf" r represent i .The Cha I decide the ti. ;i 'izens spe ki g on an is ill enforce th! f the Boa do othe ~ ~~ ~I will be lim e to a prese' his/her point' ay be ent fined by th' n. it must be it ted to the' y ebate betwe~ c member i of allowe . ~~ ~ ~' e' rs and the fence will ~ ~ ~ ~ i ourtes at all Y r requeste t I leave any ~ tements anc oard. INT LE 1 Y AND THE CLE ¢I'~ PRESEN ~ IVE: ~G~l ~~ ~ ~~ -U`~~-~ ',~ i' ~ ~' ° ~~' ~ i'c'~7~ ;r ~„ ~~ x ~' c ~F ~';z ,. ti~ N~ ~ ' ~f: I r.~ ~ y t ,, ' 7 ~?P~i 7 i j { I I, ' . ~ F a 1~ k! ~ ~ x rr 1~ ~~ ~h ' ~~ S ,,; I- I~~~i3 ,-I ~ ti I A ~~ '~~, FUNDING RE U ' ~~ '.'~ ' SOC/AL AND C ' {i ' . 's` ~, APPEARA '~ ~~ ;x n I .. ,,,,,~fiai~,rman of the Board of Su . ~r so'that I may comment. ~}{ 3 t. THE LECTERN, 1 AGREE TO AB ~a I , ~; OM HU ~ `I fi y ~~AL AGENCI'~`i~' EQU ES'r" ~ ~ _ ~! ,.a ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~{ ~rr~sors'to recognize me d~r`~t~ I { '~ ' - i. ~ ~I I U I'~ ~~ ~~''~ '1l' ?`HE GU/DECIINi~" ~ E N ~I i I I ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~' ~ ~ - ~E~~. ~' i Aker will be given three minu ~ s i~d comment whether sped , ~ i ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ 4 9 ~ ~~~ ''~E ~~ representative. The Chai a Will decide the time ~i~~ ~ ' ~~~~ ~, ~ ,;c?~ ~iti~ens speaking on an iss~~~ ~ , ~~~ will enforce the rU~e ~i~h ~' ~~ U ~;~' '~S~itY o~ the Board to do otherwi e: ,' `i ~~ ~ kit Will be limited to a preseq~ ~atit~~t of his/her point of wie ' a~ ~ ~ ;. '~ teen may be entertained by the h~irman. k ' ! • ~ ~ ` ~i- ~ dents must be directed to the E~oa~d. Debate between ~ re~a~ i~ ~~ ~, - :: ~ h~~ft~nce members is not allowed..:: ~ ~ ~.,F ,, ~ ~~ ~~: ~sr ~ { yt~ ' ~ • ` ;~~ Akers and the audience will e~ter~i~e courtesy at all times.: ~F. ~~~ .;~, ,, ,~ ~~ ~~ ,, ~ '; ~ ' fp~kars are requested to leave any v~ritt~n statements and/or cor~rn;t i l#C tai t~rQ Board. E <~ 5, ~,s:~~ PRINT LEGIBLY AND (3 > `TES THE CLERK '~'d !h"I+~ ~ ,~ ~ati, .It -4 :i . Ali ~ ~" 'nI 3 t 1, '` .q ~' i A~~ OF REPRESENTATIVE: ~~ ~ ~ G--~ s ~, ~~ i , ,~} ~ 4 y ~ ti , ass: ~~ ~- I ~. ~:I , ~~~ , ~ ,~ ~_. t ~.~~ ~ ~ f ,S~ ~* f '' "~, I i „+i' ~ta ti ~~ 1' ` ~a~s~~di~~~ ~i,l ~~ ~~ i~~~ ~iI III FUND-NG RE Q UES I ROM HU SOC/AL AND CUL AL AGEN ',~ I ,~ C ~~ ~ APPEARAN I E UE~ ~~ Q i~ airman of the Board of Supe I to recognize t t r! so that I may comment. ', i ~~. i; ',i I TO THE LECTERN, I W/ I VE MY NAB RD. /AGREE TO AB/D THE GU/DE ~ ' ~~~, 3 I er will be given three minutes II ~i ~ I mment wheth a' ~ ~'~, r representative. The Chairm itizens speaking on an issue, I decide the tii ill enforce the ~i~' ; of the Board to do otherwise. ~I ~ ', I ~, ' r will be limited to a resentat P ~ ~ ~ ~, his/her oint p i' ti ,may be entertained by the C r ~ , n. ~ ~ i ~~~ , is must be directed to the Bo ce members is not allowed. ~ i ~° ~ ~~ ~' ~~ i ~~ ;~I ! I ebate betweE ~ e~ ~ ~ ers and the audience will exec r ' ~ ' ~~, ~~ ~ ourtes at all Y ~, r~ ' t~ ~ I re requested to leave any writt Board. ~I f j i h ~' ~ ~ ~ ~~ '' ;'. iii atements and ' RINT LEGIBLY AND GIV ~ THE CLERI , ~. `1 TI,• ~ ~ !" l_i t-~ ~ 0 I i + ;~ ~ ii ~ /^1 j 1-- lY ~_ ~ ~ , I' ~ ; EPRESENTATIVE. ~ '~ '~i ~ G ~~ ~T ~ 5~; ~ ~~ V'~ U'- 1-- h ~' /~ ~ 6 ~ ~ I ~- lit 3 i ' I I I I 1 1 I ~ ~, ~ ~ ' ~r 3 ! i l ~ ~q ~' I I ~ ~~~ ,I ' ] '' ` ~' i , ~ k iR S ~~~ ~t r ~ }~i ~! ~1 ~ lili C C I 'e ~~ ~~. ~ t I i i t I B F I J 1 ~~ I i' I ~ ,' ~ i F j r ~. t C: } •. r ~ 'I I ; F UND/NG RE VEST ' ROM HUM .• ti, lx +e-:~:~` 1 1 .1 '7' ~ is ;~ ; „~a ; ~ OCIAL A ND CULT ~ RAL AGENC~ , _ a ~, ~. ;. ~~~~. ~~ ~ ., ;.' ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~,, E ~ ~ !r z, ~~~ ' f f ~ i ~ ~ f j APPEARANCE ~tEQUES7~'' , ~ + ~ ! I F ~ ~ ~ , ir I i~. , t} i, 6 z ,~- ~ ~~ , ' ~f~airman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize m~;~ } ~ , ' , ' ~ ~ ~i~ on t e;r $o that I ma comment. ~~ y ~ i . F , i {~ ~ ~ g~ Nf ! t na o 1 , k 1 . 11 1 1 ~ I; Y ! TO THE LECTERN / W/L L IVE MY N ~ AM q ! QRD. /AGREE TO AB /DE BY THE GU/DEL/ ~ ' '~ ~ ~ 33 ~ i; Sr i _ , 4~j^ii1 iJ!iJ!iJ! 1 ~ YY ~ • ~ ~e~kjer will be given three minutes to comment whether ~~ ' ~-. ~' t ~ '. .y f. ' '~~ k,' {~E i~ ~- i " I 'pry representative. The Chairman irvill decide the time; '~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ b~ citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the ru~ ~ I ~: ~l by n~y~of the Board to do otherwise. ' , E~ ; , E ~'~~~ ~ !~ ; o l~ ' ~~ i ~ ,, , ~ , ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ji ~ I~er will be limited to a presentation, of his/her oint of u!~';i ~ p ~ ~ a~ ~ j i + ~ ~ ~~il ' ~ ~~ f s of ~II o~n may be entertained by the Chairman. i ~' I4 ,~ ~~ ~ ; ,. ~ ~" ~ijv~i~ ~„~ • ~ ~ ' e~nts must be dir ected to the Board; Debate between ' I ~~' ' I ~ r ! ; I ~I ehce members is not allowed. , ~: ; 3i ~ ~~ t~ z E t k i s ~'.. 4 ~ F • ~ ~ s 'ak~rs and the audience will exercise courtesy at all tim~s~ ~ { `~'' ~' ~ ~'I I ~ ~ z ~f~ . ~ ~~ 3I _~ ~ ~ k ~ ~ '~ s are requested to leave an written stateme t d/ p a 4' ~ , 9~ fpi - ~N 4 ~ i; ",. ,,, , '~t~3 y n s an or ~o ~~ ' ' the (Board ~: ~e ~ ,i '~~ ~ . ,, ; MINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE O THE CLERK 3}i i ~ ~i / Oh IF' l I j i~ ;~I~ , I ~ ~ ~ ~, f ~ ~ 1 F REPRESENTATIVE: ~ Gt+, ~~ ~~ t , ~ ~ t, y^'i L+ °, ~ ~ ! l,~ ;, ~ ,~ i ~ a i. ~ . j .t 't 7 I k ~ • 1 ' !~ i~, a '... ', ~; ~ f ' ' {p ~~ , +, kr ~ a ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~. ~ Ir ~ ~~ . , ~ .I. ~ r F ~ ~l~liil~ I ~~ ~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~{I~I~~ .~~ ~ ~ - °~~~'~ I{~~~ Fa~-l~l ; ~ II i ~ `~ I ~ ~ ' ~~F~I ~I~j3~ (~~~ ~ ~~ j, ~ ~~' ~ ~ 5 ~ ~~ , ~ I I i9 Iii 'a ~ ~ V~ji ~ '( yyy ~ i +i' ~ , 11 Y ~ F° ~ ` i ~ i F , I ~( li ~ as ~ ~~` ~~.1 ~ i ' ' ~ _i f 1 ~' r 9,i ~ ~ I ~~ ~ ~! i ~ FUND/NG ~ UES ~' ~ OM HUM ,, , I' ~ 3 ~ ~! ~~ ~ ~ SOCIAL I CUL ~ L AGENC, F ail ~II~ ~,~ i I I ~~~~ ,,. Iii,; I ~ ~ ~ ~~ II I, Ilip ~i ~~,~ ~ I ~ I ~ i ~, r~l i ~E~~ ~~~ °~,, ~ APPS; N ~ , QUES7"i'',I~~~~~,~~~ ~'~ ~;~ ~~ q~ ~. " I irm n f th o rec nize vu ' h~~~a a o e B~ ~ ~~~ of Sue ~isdr~ ~ o m I ' p g I~. al I ~. I I~ I k ~. th1', ~o that I may comr!~I~nt. E ~ ~ `, ~ ~~I~ I ~ 'I t ' FI . s I II ;T ~~ ~ I E / MY NAM ' D' TO TH L T N / W/ E ~~ ~. ~ ,~! QRD. / AGREES' AB/D lf''I E GU/DEL/ ~ ~'~I ` I VIII ~ i I '~ i • !~I ~ I ~I ~' k~r will be given th e minutes ~o Cq meet whether L '' I or re resentative. ' e Chairm v~ril ecide the timed , '~I p ~ ~ ! ~ ~ ~ citizens speakin d an issue, end Vrv I enforce the ruiMl ~ ~I i ~! 'I r~ ty'of the Board toad btherwise.~ ~ ~'~~'~ ~ .~ ;', ', I~ I ~ ~ 1 ~~ ~ ~ I ~. .Y. j Ili. ,' S I i er d to I~ n o s/ o o i }k will be limite ' resents i her int f ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ p ~ ~ p ~~ „~4~ ' I ~n may be entertai'r~e~ by the C ~irm~~i. I i ~G I ~ x', '~t s ~ ~ ~~ a~ ' ~ i ..~ • , ~. ;, ants must be direeter~~~to the Bord.'~ ~ ''bate between ~il~~ I' ~ nce member is t~~~~ll ed. ~ ' '" I ~"a~"~ I~ I ~ ~~' ,Ilii ~ s no ow 4E~ I: 3~ { : S I,. "~ ~4 z ~i ~~7es i{; ~ Ij f r}`f ~ ~~'~I • (~ ~ h, ~~~kers and the audience will exerlCise G~urtesy at all tirr~~~,~ ~ x~ '~i ~ ~' P~ ~. ii, ~ ,tl !s- I ~ ~I I ~ ~, ~I~~, ~~ .,;;' r ~ ' • (;j ~, F are requested to leave any writen st~1<ements andlor~l~1 ~; ~'~~ <<. iil~`'~~rl~~~m~e'Board. ~; ~ ,,, ~ II~;I . ,~ III ~~I~~~~1~8i1 ~~ ~ '.li ~I~ § ~ E ~ I IFE~.I~~t t ~~IIII~ ®r~~~;l I~~ ji'II~.I .PRINT LEGIB4N'~iJ~1ND GIVE ~TCr ~1 ,` ~ ~ I .. _ I, ' F ~~ ~ ~~~~`: ?I .I' ~~ I I ~ ~ f~l~`~¢~ REP' SENTATIV~: II ~~ i ~~~_ I~~ ~~~ ~~~, p ~x I #~ I~ ,~~I ~~ ~{ ~ ~ ll~~il~llllllil~~ ~:.~~~~. _ _ ____~ E /CLERK ~N ~ U c~ `` . ~ n ..-~r~~~~ '.:~,~ ..~ 3 ~ I ,; ~ F I ' I ~~ ~ ~~` ,.,~; 9'!1 ~ >;•~7r `` I i [ Est ~ -Ir~~~~a ~k'>~+i . j~l ~ ~ rt I '', `~ ~ =~5 ~ i . ~',~ . 1 ~i i 3e I I, a ~ ;~~ ~ ~k '' ~ ~ ~' 1~ ~ 1 1 ° ~ '~ '3g ~: of ~ ~ ~ NDIN OM HU ,; r~ ~~ ~~'.~ ,. .Ir s,~ <, ~ ~ ~ ;~~. ~ ~~~OCIAL '~ AGEN ~~' ~ ~~'~ r i~ F,, ~I ~# 1 ~ .~ j ~~ ~~i '4 ,h; ~~~~ ~ - APP' ~QUESW ~ ~:~, ~~ ~~' ~ ~~~~' ~L. ~ i ,, ~ .~ ~~ ~. ~ ~, t ~ ~ .~t~~rtnan of the #©a~d of Su erv~so~s to recognize m~€ ~#' 3~~J an `. t `i, „ . ~b at I may cc~r~ia~ent~ ~ ~ =x ~ N s ;~, h ~ { 1r 1 / {~ L THE L~ .~~a I l4 ~~'VE MY NA1~` ~'~~ I~ I I aC. AGR"1 ~ /~B ~ ~ ~I'`ME GUIDE ' ~ ~~ _~ -:. I~ F~. ~" v, ; _ r. ., ,~~ ~ i!(~' E ~~ d Lr 1 ~ ~ ~ t, ~ E a . . ~3 ~I ~ ,'f K. ~.r r.- 4 I 1.' £ ~~ ~r Mill be given three minu s t~; comment whethelr ~ ~' ` ~ ~ ~ 1 r esentativ~. The Chai ~a~ will decide the tirrl>e. I !~: ,~ i s s eaki~ ~~ a ~ o n'iss ill t ~d~' of r ~ a!~t w e o ce the I'~ ~~ ~~ p ~ ~ h, na ~. b .;~ Y y~ ~ , 1• ~~ r ~' y' ~~~ '~ a~~he Board to da oth~rw ~;. r~4 ~ z'. y~~ 4~ r'j ~I ~is aAd P ~~ e 1 r ~~ E s', '"~ cA.' x 1 ~ ~ ~ r v~l~ be limited t4 a pre'se ;'ation ofhis/her point o~ v% of t. ¢ ~ { ~; °~ ~ m~~ be entertalne~ by'the' hairman. ;~ ~~. ~~ ,~ y~~yzz ~~ 1 ~ ~~ ~'~~ ~i ~~ rust be directed to the oard. Debate between ~''~d "~~ ~' ~ ~i~Ce rembers is nit ~Ilowed,'~,' '1`~ ~ ~ ~';~ ~~. , 4 ; ~, s ~~ k; r ~s ,~ rsand the audience will ep~ercise courtesy at all tl~ri~~:~ ~3<< frt ~ r'r i iF~ ~ -{ fs ~ "7- 1~. ~~ ~w~ i~, requested try leaue any un~ritten statements and/at~ 5 ,~,i`s ., x ~ ,~ ,;~. 1. r F i ,; ~ ~ ~ ,~ , ,' ~~ ~~` h~ ' I. i L~rc "" LEGI~.Ir N[~ G E TO''T~IE CLER ~ ` ~J ._ ~ ~ ~ .a ~ ~ ~ i'. 5~. y r _ ddb ~, (~ l_ Y ~~ C~~ I ~ ~, `~~IFK c',~-it•! ~~l- .T^/r ,i 4 1 '~ ~ ffi ~ #3~" i~EC~~RESENTAI'IVE: ~~5 ~ ' { ~ ~ r~ ~ :, } / I i I' ~. ~ ~ G ? I ~~ , ~~ ,p C I !. 1` i. ~'± i¢ t by ~. - - i<. ~ Nt~ f ~ % ~i '. ~ " t . 1 1 a. i~- 1-. 1 t ~;:' ..: 4 ~ c .. f ~ ~3 i k I {I ! f k r A ~~ , ~ I~jSi 'B'FI ~~ ~ I i~ ,~ ~: ~; i ~, s ~i '`q ,, ; ~ai~ , ~ ~'s ~' ; FUND/NG RE U S ~~' ~ ~ OM H(J ~: ..~ ~ a ~. ~I~~~ ~ ~~~al~ ~~..`~~ , . ~~~~,~ ~ , SOCIAL AND CU ... , L AGE ,, , ~.~, F~ ~ ~.. ~~ ~1. .~~ F. ~~~~~~~~ 5' ~ APPEARA C~'~~ UE~-~"`` ~.~~~ ~: ~ Q T~~}} ~ ~:~ ~ r ~ ...~ A~.` {{ 4 i^ ~~~ ~Y `R L} f)~ 4 1 ~~' '~ ;Chairman of the Board of Su~erw~i~ors to recognize me? I ~, ~a t~ ter so that I may comment. ,~ ~; ~, ~ ~ ~D TO THE LECTERN, I / l UfE MY NA , ~~ ~+-ORD. /AGREE TO AB/ E ,~'` 7"141E GU/Dl~' `q ~ , `~~ ~~c ,; i • ~~~~ ~ ~ ~~ '~eiaker will be given three minu s ~o comment whether ~~ ~~~~ ~ ~~~ ~'~~~~ ~~ I' or representative. The Chai man ~wll decide the tirr~ ~ ~~~ ~~~~''~~~ ~~ oaf citizens speaking on an iss e, ~~~ swill enforce the, rt.~l,„ ~~ i ~; i : ~r~ty of the Board to do otherwi e. ~' - ~il iy~ .; • ~ ~ a~Cer will be limited to a presen ati~~ cif his/her point of v~ ~~ ~ ~~I~n may be entertained by the h~irmah. "'r ~~` ,~ ~ -~ ~ r 1'#,3` r, • ?, ~~nts must be directed to the hoard. Debate betwe~rk ~ ` ' ~ ~~ . , r° i~nce members is not allowed. ~~ ~ ~ i ~~~ `~ ~ ? , ~sp~~kers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all tirn~s. ~~ • `,.~kc~~s'are requested to leave any v4lritten statements and/or da k~ t~"~tf~e Board. ~ r >; ', liryj' ~ '~. g < 5, ~ ; .- s!~ ~~~~ PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIf v°~ ~ ~ ,~ , :' ~ ~' .~I'Cy'+ Y ~- rC C V Yf ~, ~ ~ ~~ flF REPRESENTATIVE: ~ ,~:~ ~ _ c~ -~ ~ ~ r ~: ;;, ~r ~ar ~~; 1 ~ ~~; I .u s~pii~ 'rHE CLE ri 2~: ~~ ~ l ii - ~~ i { I'~ III E~~1 ~ ,~ , _ ~ { 3 ~(~{`y'r ~~ ~ ~ 1~ I ~ i i a~, ~ p~ ~ ~ i N i r ,4 ~r ~ ' 't ' ' i ~: 1 '~,, 1~~' ~~ ~ : y ~ ~ ( I { ~ ' ~ I ~I ~ I ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ . , ~ s ~ I n ~ ~ ~ ~, FUNDING RE UES7~' ~~ ROM HU ~ I . r - ~ ids i f ~3 - ~ s ~ ; I~ ~i ~ ~; ~ i I d I ~I~ ~ ~ SOCIAL AND CUL AL AGEN ~ I j~,lt ,~ . ~ j ~ ~, I I ~ ~ ,' ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ I ` ~'. ~'~ PPEARANC~ EQUES'' ~; ~ ~ I ~ ~E,. ' ~ ,, ., ~,: ~. ~~ : ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ , ,, ~ ~ , t w th ~ L t~; ~ , hairman of the Board of Supery~i~o ~~ to reco nize m~ ~ ~ `lid M'~ 9 ~~~~ so that I ma comment ~' on .; ~_ , y . ~ ~ u~ 1 ~~~ i W ~ 1 ~3~ ,k ~' ~i TO T HE LECTERN / W/ VE MY NAIVE 4 ~+ i } ~rr { : ,, F ~I ORD. /AGREE TO AB/DE ~ HE GU/DELI' f" ~' ~; ~~' , ' ~ ' ~ f r~~ ~ ~ !!f ~~~~ !. I S ' • i ~ I a ~ ~ ,~ F~ ker will be iven three minutes ~ o ~bmment wheth 9 ~ ~ r ; 1 ;,r, ',~~~:, r:, '~ ~ > ' er I~ ~ i• r rer esentativ . e The Ch airma w!v~'I d ci e de th p e tim ~ ~~ ~ ~ .~ j - f . ~ citiz ens s e k i a m on an issue ~ di ill enforce the r p nM d~ I 9 I I .z t d .b Y i i r~it I I , of the Board t o do otherwise. I k f G'. f. • ~ I'I '~ ! i c I 'Ik I r will be limited to a res n ~~' e tati ~~'~ his h ~ bn 'q / er oint of ~ p p ~ ~ s ~~ f` 0 ~ ~ ~ I I ~ , '. f'i may be entertained by the Ch~ir~m~n. f , ~ . . ~',. , ~ j ~ • i I i ~' ~'~ ,, I , II f I' I~ i~ i a p ,II ~ ! ' {I is must be directed to the Board. ~C~ebate between r I, ~,,~ i b t ll 'a' g 1 1j +F~ ~ i; der ,F ° ~- ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ce mem ers s no a owed. Y ~ui ~,', I ~ 77 { E ~ 3 j • i I I ~~ ~ i ~ ~ I' f.~{L q r ers and the audience will exerais ~' ~lourtes at ~ ~ ~ `~~~ d all ~ tim ~., ,~s y ~ r ._ ~ 14 i ~' t ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ l ~ I , II ~ ' ~ re re uested t o leave an writt n std tement n ~ q e b s a d/or Y ~ ' i .~ f `~ , r ~. , ~ i i I ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ t ~ I , B r ~ , oa d. 5 ~ ,' {r. ~~ k ' ~1. f ~ - ~ ~,; ~ , e ~ .~' ~~z _: ~. , ~ 1, ~I , ; ~I' RINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE '1' I THE CLERK' i I„ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I ~ ,~ ~ ~~ 6 {{,,, rp'. ,f ~ y~ > J . d~. i~~ ~ ',:' ~ :~ 1 I I nJ i JJ / - n _ '~hI ~, i ( . ~ ~ ~ ~ C EPRE E ~ ~ ( S NT ~ 1 ~, ~ ~ f. 1 5 z~ 4 ~ u '1 ~. C ~ p S I. ~~ - J pv ..t Y, 1 .. a~ ~ ~~- r ~ I i , AA .J r~ . -- A TIVE. a l' . ~ ~.~'~ ,; .. ~ ail ~~ ~~" ',. '. t ~ ~~ d~ s- I ~s ~ ~ - I --1 t ~;. - t,- s ~ 1 , ~, ~ r ~ ,~y- ( ~ ~ _.._, ~ ~ r. .~.' ' i !I I ~ I i ' ~. I ~ I ~ ~ ~ j ~ i ~; , ~',, i 'r ~ ~~ ~ P" ~ ". ~I . a' e ~ ' ~' i i I , 1 ~ : ~ ~ I ~ ~I r. I i1 i ~ h '1 i ~ i1 .7 a{,~ ' ~~~~1~ ~~'~~~ '~ i ~I,, E i i !~; ', ~' tl i, ~ i ~l I' ~ ~~. ,, I i a r Ala, i ~ ~ I, ~~ ~ ~I '~ ~~, I' f ~;' ~i '~; 'I I~ ,~ ~, ~;~ 'i I~~ l j APPEARANC irman of the Board of Suer that I may comment. 1'O THE LECTERN, I 1! tD. I AGREE TO ABI E' ;e will be given three minu es r epresentative. The Chai ma ;it zens speaking on an iss e, f the Board to do otherwi e. I r ill be limited to a presen atic ay be entertained by the Chi it must be directed to the oa members is not allowed. ens and the audience will e~erc I ~, r~ requested to leave any vWritt~ ~oard. I, DINT LEGIBLY AND GN ~tl~`-tv t~ - V ~ ~~ 'I ~~~ PRESENTATIVE: ~~' HUMAN ;EQU EST to recognize me during. the rr ~E MY NAME AND ,4D HE GUIDELINES LI"S ~ 1 nment whether speaking a decide the time limit based ill. enforce the rule unless ii' his/her point of view only. n. ICI, ebate between a recognize ~' ~ourtes at all times. Y I ~~tements and/or comments. THE CLERK TO THE E ..II r ", Isis ~:. ~~;, ~ ~' ~ i' ~~~~~~'~~~ ail ~ ~~ , ~~ ,s ,~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ + ~~ ~~ ~ ! I~~e t 1' '~ ~~' r i::~~.~ . ~. ,ti i i i ~ ~ r ~ ~ J r~ . ~ ~ ~ y.' ~ i ;,f ~_~I d i ~ ~ ~1~ ~ k .~ t a i' ND/N U U M H ,. ! 16' SOCIA 'C AGE ~' ~~ ~ w '~ ` ~ I ~ APPI ~ , ~ QUE~ ~. ' irman of th~~ '~ of S ~~ ,~recogniz~ '...that I may ,~nt. ~i', N ~~ !~~ ~I u~. ki p ~ i p~ i~ i F! ~' O THE L ~ IV, 1 ~ MY N~ I. D. I A G AB GU/D N ,~,~ ~ ~fl -u p ~ ,i ~; K,: ~~ ~ ~ , ~€ ,~ A ~ ~ a , ~ ~' I i~i~~ ~ ~i ' ~ 'r;will be giv ~ min e ent whet ~e~ ~, ~presentati ~ ~ ~ .fv Gha ~ ~; ~ , ids the t~~n i~ens speak~i 'fan is e,' ~ i~nforce the ~ ~ i `j'~ the Board Lathe ~'~ ~~ i ~ , will be limits ~prese tq ~~}~ her point X01 ay be ente ~~~ib th h ~~~ Y ~., ~~ ~ ~ 5 ]~?i; ~ '~, I ~ ~ '', ill € I ...,must be di o the c~a ~~ . ~~te betwe~r! a members i ~ ~~lowe .i - ` ;~ ~' ~ i ~ ~ ~ a ~ ,, ~ ~, E ~s and the a ~~ ~~ will ~r ?pq~t~tesy at all ~~tij r~ .requested t ~; ~~ any r~t ~~I ~t.~~nents an~i/C oard. ~ ~~ ~r~ ~, ~ ~ @ ~ ~3~ 1 ~ , 5 ANT LEGI N'D E CLE .i ,~~ N 1 J I~ I~ R~ ~~ I Q } ~ PRESENT w ~ ~. ... C ~ ~~ a I { i a ~ ~,~ u 4 ; ,E a i ~~ i ~ I , '~ ~ ~ I~~i ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~I~I ~ .J ~~~. ~,,~~ >~ ,~ I,j ';I ~~ ~; '~L _~ t I 7 ~'~ 1 ' UND/N RE U ~',~i SOCIAL' ~1 ND C ~~ . I i j i APP~~ARA '~ ~,;i ~, airman of the Board of Sup ~- that I may comment. ~, I O THE L~4~TERN, D. / AGR'rEE TO AB ~i, ,;~~~ ~~ will be given'three minu presentative; The Chai ~~ i I,zens speaking on an iss c~~f the Board to do otherw ~~ a 'II ~gUvill be limitejd to a prese ,;r~iay be enterkaned by the (I 4' li ~~, must be directed to the members i~ not allowed'', ~~I~s and the audience will e~ 5 r ~ ~~ ~~ requested to leave any E~oard. I I ~~~~IINT LEG1~4Y AND ~~ .i~°~e ~=.~ t~I~EPRESENT~ITIVE: y ;~ . .s" ~Y~,Z - ~~ ~r~ ~I h ~~ j~ I II if~l {{' i ~~ V a i. ~' ~ f ~~ ! ~ ~ ^~~~ ll ~ ~'' F I ~I~ ~~~ifG ~~ . ;~~ ~. P V. ~,. ` QU EST '~, '' -~ ~~ ~~ ~~ t~ recognize me C +~ f MY NAME ,~ E GU/DELIN~ r ~ ~ . ~I~ ~ ,~~~~ '~ I ,~ e , ~~ent whether sp~~ dcide the time li ii(~ enforce the rule', ~I F ,.~ '~~ ,. -~ ~ 9 } ! F phi/her point of vie` ~ ' n ~,,,, ~,, ~ I~ ~ ~I i i .;;i~eate between a ~~ b i.5,. I ~F « Ali F. , [ p j~' i~. by p '' ~~ ~ ~ ,, ~~tir`tesy at all time$ ~ r s ~~ pr ~:. ~ )' ~tments and/or c ~~ 3 1. I - . i ~ i ~'~,. w ~~ ',. E CLERK T i F /, APPEARAN airman of the Board of Sul, o that I may comment. TO THE LECTERN, I RD. /AGREE TO AB ;er will be given three minul, r representative. The Cha~' ;itizens speaking on an iss'' of the Board to do otherwj .r will be limited to a prese '~ may be entertained by tha' its must be directed to the :,e members is not allowed' ers and the audience will e~'~~I ',~ re requested to leave any 'I~~,~ i~ Board. ~~ ~~~ ~. INT LEGIBLY AND (~~"-I' // ~ ~, I I. C.C~i7~~1 C ~~U~ ~ ck ~, PRESENTATIVE: ~ 10~' /1. ~lf~~~~~ ~ I'~~, -~ ~~ ~~ QUE~ recognize MY 1 GUh ent wheth r :,ide the ti e :nforce the r~ er point to betwee esy at all gents anc E CLE ~, ~~ ~9~ ~ ~ E~ y ~~ APPE ';~~ I ~ ARA N~~i~ EQUEST ~ ~ i, , ~ ~ . ' ~ ! ~~ ~ ~ ~, ~ li ~; 'i ~,: ,, ~,: • u h airman of the Board of Sup~rr~l~drs'to reco nizeme d ~h ~~~ 1r~ on ~ ~ g ~ ,9 s~ that I may comment. I ', ( ~~ ~ ~ ~'~ i~ I ~. ~ IR ~ ~ ,i I6,~ ~i~ a O THE LECTERN 1 J ` ~ ' ~ ~ /1VE MY NAM EA a ~~~ D D. I AGREE TO AB/D ~' ~1~'I !iHE GU/DEL/NE I ~ , ~ I E, ~ ~~ ' ~ I I ~ ~~~~ i; ce will be iven th ree minutes ~''~ g ~~a Gc~ry'~ment whether spe r ~e resentative. The Chair a v~ill tlecide the tim I ~~ p ~ ~ ,; e im ;itizens s eakin on an issu ',d'~ ill enforce the rul '' p g ~~ ~ V~v e i, ~ by df the Board to do otherwise. ~,~ ~ ' ~ ' ~ ? k , i ~, IF :r jrvill be limited to a resent Iti~n, d~ his/her oint of vie ~ ~ '~ ' p p t i p~"15 of rr~ay be entertained by the ~'h~irrrhar~. ' ;,~ ~~ ~ i '~, , ~ la ~~ ,~ 'I~l 9~' it ~ must be directed to the B ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'~ ~ '~~ ~ ` ~' ~ dard. ©~bate between a re ~ i~~ ~ ~er ~~, members is not allowed. ~ ~ ~ A s ,~ ers and the audience will exerai~e~~ ~durtesy at all times. I ~„ a E r~, k r F re', requested to leave any wrltt statements and/or corgi, ants rid ~j Bloard. ~I '~~ ~ ~ '~I~ I ~l ~ ~ E~ ~ poi ~~ ~^ INT LEGIBLY AND G1~~ ~T~ 'S'HE CLERK TO I~, ~ ~~ ` I ~ s ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ u~'1 ~" U ~C__ L_ k j7 1 PRESENTATIVE: ~, 1 :tlt I { j ~f r 111 ,~ ~~p F ~ h ~~ . u , f t ~ ii' '~ k~i ~ ', ~ i ~ ,~ ~ ~~~ ~< ~,i~ i FUNDING RE U .ROM HUMAN SOCIAL AND CU AL AGENCIES APPEARA C EQUEST u he Chairman of the Board of Su e to reco nize me d rin s u the g 9 m t ors g titter so that I may comment. I LED TO THE LECTERN, 1 / /VE MY NAME AND AD R ~~ ECORD. 1 AGREE TO AB/ E THE GUIDELINES L/ST D N pecker will be given three mina es mment whether speaking as a ' ual or representative. The Chai r of citizens speaking on an iss jority of the Board to do otherwi m e, e. I decide the time limit based ill enforce the rule unless in n tr h c ~' ~ by u Baker will be limited to a prese ati his/her point of view only. u ti 'rPs q~ ~ , i ation m e n a b e tertained b the Y Y h C r . ''~ jl ;: ~ ' ~ ments must be directed to the dience members is not allowed. oa ebate between a recognize s e tiler j I~ I peckers and the audience will e er ourtesy at all times. ~~ w ' ~~ ers are requested to leave any ritt n atements and/or comments it t I I ~~ o the Board. ~i , ~iE PRINT L EGIBLY AND G V T THE CLERK T TH O EB ~~ V OF REPRESENTATIVE: ire ~~-' ~ r II ESS: I ~ ~' ~ C~ ~ c~' I ~~ C' ~ ~ ~ A ~ J ~,~: ~ ~ ~~~ u i -~~ ~ i~ ~~ o ~'~ ~. I~ ~ ,;.~r~:~€~ - k ,I, ~ it ~a ~-~ ~;~~ _,~~~ a ~~~~ ~ '~i ~.. a i { ~ ~ ~~ ~# ! i~~i~ ~~N~' F `~ 3 ~ ~~ ~i ~ r~ .i~t S ~ ~ r ~r. j °i t N ~~ w ~, , ~ ~ FUNDING RE UE FROM HUM (~ 1 ~~ ll~ `' ~ ~ ~~~''~ ; SOC-AL AND CU ' ~ AL AGENC , ~ =~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . t f l: p ~ "I {. ~ , i 4, ~ ' .i 7~ E, ~Yr ~ I a 1 ~~; ~~ ~ APPEARAN ~~REQUES'~I'~ ., ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~,~ _` ~ Chairman of the Board of Sup t~ru~t~rs to recognize m„ d ` _ a ' i ~ pn ', ~, ~o "~' i ~ -!; °~ ~ ~ y ~~r so that I may comment. ~ ;~ ~ ~ „~~~ ~~~ ~.~ - ~F 1 ,~ , i ~~ ' ~, e ~_ a, ~~ ~D TO THE LECTERN, I ~ / ~. ~ I VE MY NAM ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ !; I ~ CORD. 1 AGREE TO AB/ THE GU/DELI' R': ~~ I ~ ~ 1' '~~ Y a~? tr 3 ~ 1 lid `~ ~' Ili T~ I I 1~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j J ' 1 I~~ ~.I ( ! f ~~~ ~ !~~ ~ ~~ ~e,aker will be given three minut 's~'~~~omment whether t~~, `~ ~~~~ ff '~ ` ~I~ s~; ~ p ' '~ i I~ or representative. The Chairr ~ wr/ill decide the time ~ ~;~. ~ ~~ ~ ;` ,, a ~ I : 9 x ~~ii ~ olf citizens s eakin on an issu ~~;~~ will enforce the r~ ~~~ ', ~~' i ~ ,~'~~ ~~ ~ h I F I Y p g ~ ~ ~`~~ ~ ' ~ pity of the Board to do otherwise.' ~ ' ~ ~ , ~ ' 9 ~~ ~ ~~ 1 i ',i ¢ [ I ;w'~J~ ~E ~I ~ ;E` i~ r ,~ '„ ~ ~ ~a;ker will be limited to a resent n;~:of his/her oint of u,~ ~ ~ .!, '~ ~,~~~~of ~~~~ ~~. ;~. ' ~ ~~ion may be entertained b the (~~'~irt!nan. I ! .; ~ ~ ~ ~-~~ ~~k ~~ ,~~ ~ ~ ' ' ~ ! ,~~ ,~ ,EI Y ~~~~, i _ ~ ~,, ski •ti ~' ~ '"~` ~ 'i ~~ ~~ r~ ' ~ ~ ~~~ N ents must be directed to the Board: Debate between ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~` , ~~. i~nce members is not allowed. ~ ~~ ,~ ~ ~ ~~~~'~ ; ', ~ °~,:, ~~ ~ f ~ ,. ~ i ~c ~d,' ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~'~`~~' ~~e~kers and the audience will exer~i~~ courtesy at all ti-~~~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t' ,` a ~~ ~~ +~ ' r i ~ ~;~, „ , ~~s are requested to leave any w~itt~h~',statements and/orl ~~ ~ ~, ,~ ~' t~~ the Board. ~ « ' ,~ ~~~~~ k ~ ,~ ~~ i+; ~ ; ~ ,. r ,~ ' ~ PRINT LEGIBLY AND GI O THE CLERK ~ ~~~ I, , '' ~ ~Y, ,, 1~ ~, ~ 4 4~ ~ ~. R - G" ~ '" I ~ ~ ~ ~,~ ,. o ,~~,;i DIY: b ~ ~ 11~. ,~.r~. ~( ~ ~~_~C_ ~~ ~~> ~~ - "~ ~ a.! ~~ ~ ~ ._ ~ ire ~ ~ i ~ ~R ~~~ ' e F REPRESENTATIVE: ~er, -~ " i ` ,~~ ~ ~ a- '~~ ~' ~~ t ~- ~. s ~ i - '. ,t '~'i •,1 ~ is ,~ _~~ if ~ .' 1 ii 5, I 1 ~ }. h a _ F, . 7~~ ~ 't~~ - ~ ,~~~ t T -~G i ~ n . 11 ~ s~..~if t ~ ~i ~ i na ' ~° ~ t F gi, ~ ~~ ~ r ~~,' i tr 4~'H ~' ~ - ~ ~~ `~ sir' ~~ ~' ~~ , ° *~ ~. '' ~r~ ~, ~ ~. 'p y' ~, }.~ PPEARAI~~.1' EQUE~-''~'I~°x'`4;..1 ~ ~ ,. .'; 1 Y E d f the Board of Su' o !to rec niz ~. Q ~ r~ o e m ~ on p ~ __ tin 9 ~~~'.~ A ~ gg ~~tf` s~~h~rt I may comment. ~ ~ ~ . ' ~~ i~' ~ ,. s r I ,o-; d •~~ '~ ~' ~~ `~E LECTERN, 1 ~ ~ ~I ~ ~~ ~J'VE MY NA1 ~N' ~, , ~ ~ .~ ~,~~, ~/AGREE TO AB/ ~ Y THE GU/DELJ ~ ~ E t,`{~.rr ~~ n k ,, ~~~~ ~ , ~ . ~~~r~wil~ b~ given three minu~~s comment whether ~_ 1 M1 . ' in ~I,~~~~~~~ntative. The Chail-im~~` will decide the tim~t r E~ '~~ _.~ ~n~~l~s~eaking on an iss~i~, ~~d will enforce the ~fi~[ ~ ~ ~Y t' i~ ~ ' a r~~r ~ t pit ~ "~~h~eB~oard to do otherwi ~ ~"~ ' ¢ ~' ~,~ ~''t f `'1 ~' ~~ ~'f Y - 1 rl .~ ~ ~'~II be limited to a rese ti °n o i h p r11~a ~ f h s/ er point of vl~yi~ l ~ of ~~g ai'i rfy b+~ entertained by the ~h~~rm~n. p ,~ ~~ ~- ,~~~~ ,'~ _ t~N~ ~1~-~r~ ~ ~K ~,l ~ ~ ~~:x ~ ~i1~1~~C1r1USt ~e directed to the ~ioarc. LJebate between ~ ~ " ~ 7 X ,r ~~ ~,. ~ , ~~~~~F'n~mb~lers is not allowed. 'r t;~. ~~~ ~ .'~, 4r ~ ~` I b ,~ ~~f~.~e~l~~ ar~d the audience will eXerc~se courtesy at all tuna, ~ ~f ' ~,~ ~ ! t u s~ E i s r~ ~, ~~'~ 'r5 ~~= x ested to leav _ ~q-~ e any wr~tt~n Statements andlor ~, F~ ~~;. ~~ ; ;,. ~, ,~ ' .^ _. ~~ 1 9`~a ~~ ~ ~~~~GIBLY AND G~ ~`TQ THE CLER t;~~ ~~~ i / n 1 '~V'f `~ ~ ~ 1 ~ G ~ ~. ~ . , ., r ' 1 t ;, I' ~ ~ ~' `~ ~ ~~N `+~~ F~F'f~SENTATIVE: 'I ~/~-~'~- ~~'Cr~r" ~ I q l 1 ' 1;~~~~ 5 ~" ~ '~ ~ r•~ ~Jk" C ~ C~ ~ ~~ ~ _ .. .~ .~:~ ~ ~ ~ ~ is A., ~ }~~~ ~f ,d ;a ~ r ? [ `` FYI- ~ fLL.f10I~~.~~Ai~L~~~.;~~ a l:l. {~~,~ ~. ..i ~. ~~~ ~)f21~:' il~,~l l1~~i~~~~i~llil ii i i~111 u ~~ci pE. I ~~ t~ 2 :~ •r: b' ,~: F', EN APPEARAI ~he Chairman of the Board of S utter so that I may comment. LED TO THE LECTERN, ECORD. /AGREE TO AB REQUEST '~, ~, rs to recognize me d~r~ng G/ VE MY NAME A f THE GUIDELINE iii ~ ~~ ' ; i i~ u. i I ~~I ~y ~~ ~~ ~, ~~~ I~~ on i ii! j ~I'~~ i~ ,,. ~ ~~ ,~ i~ ~ ~i ~ P~ ispeaker will be given three min t ~~~ comment whether sp a~tin~ i~'~, 'i ' ual or representative. The Chi will decide the time li itlba~e '~ 'der of citizens speaking on an is ~ nd will enforce the rule ~r~le~fi ~~ ~'orit of the Board to do othe i ' ~ .~i w ~' ~ ~' '~ 1 Y ~ I i ER I ~ if ~ '; pecker will be limited to a pres n~ t ~~ n of his/her point of vie pnl~j. ~ ~ cation may be entertained by th irman. ~ '~ ~ ' ~ mments must be directed to the ~o~r~l. Debate between a r~cagrh~z Udience members is not allowed. - i ; '' I ~~' i ~ ~ ~$ Bakers and the audience will ' x~ 'use courtes at all times ~ '~ f ~~' ~~~' ~~~ ~~' ~Cers are re uested to leave an ~w Fitt ~n statements and/or co e~rnt q Y~ P li 'i 'to the Board. i' ~ ~i ~ ~ ~~ ,I ' i ! 'I ~ i~' i J ~I $E PRINT LEGIBLY AND ,i `wcY: ~ C~C.~i~'~~~ ~_ C OF REPRESENTATIVE: 'i RESS: ~~ C~ ~~ ~~! `~~ ~~~ TO THE CLERK ~-~-- ''t'.B I;, ii r; I~~ ~~ by'~ ofd ,,, ~~ li , ~' ;I ,, ~; ~' !, ~~~ 'i ~ :,€ j. ' `~ ~~ '~ i ~,, jj'' is ~.l ~i ~ Ei ~~ 11 ~ ,,~ ~~ ' ~~II ~,~ ~„ ~ ~, ~ ^ , ~~ i ~ ~i ,~~ ~ ~ k ~~~;~ ~ F UND/NG RE UE ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~; ~~' ~ ~'~~ ~ SOCIAL AND CU '~ i ~ ,r d~ ,3I ,f ~' ~~ APPEARAN~ ~~}, QOM H L A GE ~~~~~~~REQUEST ~~ (' I + 1. ~I ~~ t <<~, ~ `l~ " ~~ i ~_ i i,, ,,, r;~I ~~ 1 ` ' like the Chairman of the Board of Super~+i~ors to recognize me duri i g ~~~ ~~ f .,~n4~ on f~ E ~ ve matter so that I may comment. ~ ~ !~~ ~~ f „ CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I Vlj~/ ~ ` ~l VE MY NAME AN HE RECORD. I AGREE TO AB/DE ~ ~ THE GUIDELINES I' W: ~ k '' i ; ~ } i -~; ~- ~~ h'~ ach speaker will be given three minutes Kok comment whether spec i`, `, , ndividual or representative. The Chairm~p ~nrill decide the time limit ~. ~ ~~umber of citizens speaking on an issue,'~r~d will enforce the rule un s ~ ~;~ r ~; ,the majority of the Board to do otherwise.' ~~ ~ ~ E ~ ~~ ~• 'd~ he speaker will be limited to a presentat~~r~ of his/her point of view ~" ' larification may be entertained by the Ch~i~man. ~ '-,,, ,+ ~ FE.:. Mary` E • '« ~ ; II comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a rec~ ,,~ ~ ,, nd audience members is not allowed. ~: ~ • `F `;~p~oth speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ~ i i IN~~. r • ,,r ; ~,~5peakers are requested to leave any writt~r~'statements and/or com 11~lerk to the Board. i a~. ~ ~; , E ~. ' ll~ ~' ''~~~ ~9~IIpLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GI ~~ ~; '~~~AGENCY: ~A(,~t ~~N~~K~ C~~N~` C, "; - ~~IAME OF REPRESENTATIVE: ~ "~ °~''~~` -r~ ~-: ~,, ~~ '' 'HONE: _S i~~: 3~~ ~ GZ(~ ~ ~ iy ~~ 1~ N ~i { iG ~~~E :4; ~~~ yyh ~p ~ ii ~ „l~~l~'^~ ~, i '. ~_ r / ` ~~,~ ,~ ,i °r~ ~P s s ~~, `•' ~ ~~ ` ~ , in ' l ~ + a e ~d by '~ e , ~ ~tl ~~~ ~;`is of i i ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ a i~ ;t ~~ c~ ~ r ~~ ~~ ~ ~ i~ ~I ~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~' ' ; ~i i ~ ~el E t , ~ r { ~~' ji, ~ ~ I~~ ~l 'r ~ ~ a THE CLERK TO TIM r~`~~c~ ~~~~~C~) f G „ i ' ~ t .f yell! ' ~ '.r ~. ~ ' ~ ~{~ EI ~ ,, '~, a f ,, +. 1 a ;~ ~~ R °" ~! ~s { ~~~ ;;i::: i~ I li d ~ ~. ~ ~ I ~ 'i '. i I ~ ~ , i ~ ' 1 ~ ~ ~''~~ a ~ ~~,k~ ~ FUNDING RE U ~ I ~ ~ ~f~'ROM HUMAN ~, ~~ ~, ; ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'~~; ~~ SOCIAL AND C L , ~ ~' L AGENCIES I 'i I ~ ~ , ~ : ~' k ~ PPEARAI~ I, 'I I !~~EQUEST ; j', i ~~ . , ' ~~ 'I' ~ ~ li ~ like the Chairman of the Board of S~' e ~~i ~~ per ©rs to reco nize rrie Burin g ~ h ~~ ~etin on of 9 , ~t ~~' , ~Cwe matter so that I may comment. ; ' I '~, ~' ~ CALLED TO THE LECTERN I 'I W ' ,~ ~~4 I VE MY NAM AND ~ ~~ ~ S S ~ ~ ~''HE RECORD. /AGREE TO AB~D~ I ~'~'HE GU/DELI~NES 1 ~ i ~ I~/- , i ~~ ail i ;each speaker will be given three minute ~ ¢ol~nment whether~~~speaki an ~~'~G~ I ~ i!ndividual or representative. The Cha~rrr~~' vvil~ decide the time limit b e n the I ~ ! ~ number of citizens speaking on an is~l,ue~ ~ ~ will enforce the rule unl s 'i tr~cted by i ~ ' ~~he majority of the Board to do otherw!~se. I ~ ~ ~ .~ ;, ~, ' ~ ~ ~'he speaker will be limited to a presenta~io of his/her point of view or ~l ~ue~tions of '; dlarification may be entertained by the Chi rman. I ~ ' ~ ~~ ~ ',I;, ' All comments must be directed to the Baar .Debate between, a reco n iz '' ~ s esker ~~ '~ ~ i~ 3 L~ ' and audience members is not allowed. ~ ' i I, ' ~ ~, ~ , . '~i~ Both speakers and the audience will ~xer~i s~ courtes at all times. ~ y ~ ~'~ ' T '! ~, ', eak r re r ~p e s a equested to leave any writt i ~ n statements and/or comm~l e t t it ~ the . ~~ ~ ~' d l ~ Clerk to the Board. ~ ~ ~ f ' L A E in' E S PRINT LE IB G LY AND ~31V`E TO' THE CLERK TOT D /~ ~ 1 ~ A A ,~ L GENCY: ' ,, i a ~~ ~ ' ~ " ~ ~ ,, ~ I ~ ~~ ~ ±,~~~~ ~~ ~ DAME OF REPRESENTATIVE: ~~ ~ t --- ~ ~ ; ~ ~ r ~ (~'~, 'ADDRESS: ~~~~~-'~ T~,~c(~~~" ~~i~-~_ ~~;.i ~,d~` ~' ~I ~~~' ~ ~ I I ~ ~, ~ I -~7 ~ ~~ ~ - ~ PHONE: l I ~ I ~, ~'~ ~ , i ~,e 1 !~ `~. k ~, ~ ~ ~. ~, ' ~ i ~~ i ~ ~ i ~ r + ~ ,d '° !~ ,d ~~ ~ k _ '' .. ~, ~ ~ i ~ ~ 4 1 9 ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~` ,~ , FUNDING RE VESTS FROM HU ,.~ ~ ,. ~ ~ ~ ; ~ , SOCIAL AND CULTURAL AGEN~I ~' ~ ! je ~~ ~' F ~; ;; '~ ~ ~', e , ~!~ ~ I ;~~ ~ APPEARANCE REQUES~'1"~, ~'~~, ~ ~ ~ ,~ ;l t ~~ ' ~ ' ~ Md like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize rnel ~ ~ ~~ I i~ ~ ~ i , ~ing on t ove matter so that I may comment. ~ '' ~, , j ! 'i° N CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME ~ ~~ , ~ ~ S THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GU/DELIl1` ~ Wi ~ r ~, i ~ ~, ~ ~ Each speaker will be given three minutes to comment whether ~ ~'~ !~ 'I !i k 4 '. ~ ~ !.individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time li f i ' b ' ~ t e ~~ num ; er o c tizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the ru~ r~l ~ i t ' ted by ;the majority of the Board to do otherwise. I ~', i '~ ~~, i The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point ofi vh ~ p y. ~ ions of ~ '' ~'~clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ~~ ~ ~~ a ~ ~~ ~ i ~ ; ~ ~ ~. ~~~~ I < A I comments must be directed to the Bo rd. D a ebate between a ;'and audience members is not allowed. ~ ~~' a ~ ~ 't ~ ~~ i ' ~ aker ~ I ~:'~ h I ~ V ~ ~ p I . . ' ~i~ ~ ? Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all tim ~ ~'~, ~ ~ ~;~ ~: , ; i ; ' `~ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or I ~~ n~~ i~ ,he .( 4"~ II ;Clerk to the Board. h ' , ~ ~ '~ ~ i ~ ~ i i ~ ~ ~ ; I ~ I '!, i" '~ j~ ' i '~ I i , ' ; ;'PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK ~~~ D ~ q i { ~~ ~ i 7 ~ 1 , ~ ~~ i I ~~ ii i ~ ~ `~'~ ~ AGENCY: ~ ~~ ~~ _ ~,~ S >- ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ z. ~, (' } s . ~, ,~n~ ~ ~i NAME OF REPRESENTATIVE: ~' ~ ~ ~5 ~ ~'~~ ~ ~ ~ + II 6 I ~2 ~ ~ 'ADDRESS: ~~ ~ ~ ~--~ ~!(~ ~ ~ S +~L~ ~ ~ ~,~~ jl ~; k F ., ~ 1. ~J .~- > ,~ PHONE: ~~ ~ ~ '~~ ~ ~ - ~ I ~ ~ R ~ , ~ ~ o ~ ~. ;, ' ik ~ F I , ' Y 9 r6i t' ,~ ~~ ~~ ~,~~ ,,,I ~, i ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ =1 ~{ ! I , i, e p~ i ~. ~~ ~ I .~ 3 ~, ~, h I ~,s;~ ,i I; ~,~; I ~,~ c 9 ', ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ I ~~ ~ I ~ Lk~ i~~~ I ~ i' ~i ~f ~'~ ~ j 1 ', ~E ~'~fi ~i §, , 3i I li r ~" I , ~~ l~~, ~;~ i li,~ ~h, ~iE i I ~~ ' . 11 !~ .~ Vii, ~,:~~i i I ~'. ~ ! I ~~ ~ I ~~ i'i, ~~AA/1 Li/ /A/I A w/, f ~I I~ ~~~ ~~ AP P EARAN C I '~ U EST ~~Q i,i ! i ~''e Chairman of the Board of Superv ohs t~ recognize me duj~ g the; eating on ~'tter so that I may comment. II i ' ', ~' ~' ED TO THE LECTERN, I WIL I V~E MY NAME A ~ AD E S CORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE ~, TIME GU/DEL~NE IST !'~, ~~' Baker will be given three minutes t~ c~~ m ~~nent whether spe~~ ing a ~ n ~~~~~ P ~~ ~ ~~al or representative. The Chairma w~ll decide the time limi~~ ased ~ n t e ~~- of citizens speaking on an issue, al d'; il~ enforce the rule u ess i ru ted by ~~ority of the Board to do otherwise. ~~, ~ 1 p aker will be limited to a resentati I, '''f his/her oint of view t nl '' a ions of lotion may be entertained by the Ch~ rrr~~an; ~ ~ ~~ ;~' ~'ments must be directed to the Boar. pe~ate between a re ` gniz 'spl aker ~aience members is not allowed. ' ~ ~ ~~~, ~ 'I~ I~eakers and the audience will exerc~~S~eoo~Urtesy at all times. iii ~~ ~ ~ I 'ors are requested to leave any written ~tat~ments and/or corn ents ~ ith ~, he ~b the Board. ,~+ ',~~ ~; E PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVEI,ITN 7YHE CLERK TO "~HE ,~, ~, i _ OF REPRESENTATIVE: ~' T I' '~~SJ ~ ~ ~ ~~SS: ~ -G ~ ~w -P~ > S/.~-lei y ~ -»----' ~~--~,; ~, ~! u ~k~ ~, ~v ~ +~~ y~,r•~ r ~~I F, f F~I~ ~ µ r a 1h, ~k ~~~!~ ~ x ~ E t: ~ i ~~~ ~ , s ~ ~' ~~ ~ i<< ~. I ~ ", ~ s z n 5~ ,f€~~~ °~'~~` ;i~ € ~ ~ q ' ~~'~ FUNDING RE U S~ OM HU ~, ~ h ~ ~ ~'~ ~ ~'- - ~ i ~ , J ~fi i ?~ ~; I~, ~• SOCIAL AND CULL L AGEN ~ 4 ~~ ~i ~ ~ , ~. ~ ~_ ', r ~.! ~ ~ r4 ~ ~ .1C ~ ~ k~ ~ h k ~ ~ ~ ~ a r ' ~~ ~; ~ ~,•~ ~ APPEARANCI EQUESG,'~'" ~~~ ~~ ~~ ; ~ ~ ~~ ,~~ ~, la ,;i' ~, ~ ~ r ~ ~i _~ b e ~, 'hairman of the Board of Super~r~~~ to recognize ~ `~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ on ~•~t ` r~~ so that I ma comment. '~ ' ~ ~~ r~ ~ `` ~' ' ~~ TO THE LECTERN, I ~IVI ' ~ ~~~1/E MY NA ~~ • ,, ,. of RD. I AGREE TO AB/IDS ~;'~'~HE GU/DE~. I ~ `3' ~ ~' i a ~ ~ ~.3 ~ t f u ~° •, ~ ~ ~~~~~Cer will be given three minutes ~t rnment whether ~' i, ~,, ~' ~ N~qr representative. The Chai',rm li!decide the tire; ~ ~; •` ., ~~~ i• ;~ .~- ,,x ~~ ' ~ iti ns e r ,, i ~ ,,4 ~ ze sp along on an issue, ~, ' III enforce the' ~~ ' b~~ l~lx ~ ~` ~~t~ of the Board to do otherw~~se ~ • ~} r ~ < ~ I = ~~` ~ ~~~~ r ,i F E ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ' s= ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - ~ , ~ ~ ~{ ~ ~~ ~r will be limited to a preser~tati~~ a~ his/her point of;~ ~ ~ ~ GIs p1~ it ~~~ ' E ' ~n may be entertained by the Ch~~~man. ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~ `'' '~ .i ?~;~~ "~ is must be directed to the o r e ate B d D b between r~. •I~ ._ :~~ ~ ~ ,, ~,~ ~; ' ~ ~ i ~ ,rice members is not allowed. ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~', ~ ~ n .: * ~~ L r ~. Y~~ 4j~ qqp~ *1 ~ M~ III ~ z~ '~ ~~l~ers and the audience will exer+~ise courtesy at all ~ir~~~." , ~ t` ' ;~ ~ ~' ' ~ y f~~ d~ ~ ~; E~ €~i~~ ~7 u f ~I ,, ~~ ~~ are requested to leave any written s~etements and/or' I~pr'ht~r#t ~'` ~ '. III '~ ~ ~ ~', t~ Board. ~ r; ~~ i - x~ ~ } ~ ~~. ~ 7 ' ~ t'~I ~: . ~. 9i I~ ~~i ~~ ~. E~,~ ,I~I ', I' i' t- i K RIN L B ~~' T EGI LY AND GIV 'THE LE ~ C Rl~a ~~ ,~ ,~ ..L, P. ~! f ~ t + ~°,'. r ~ ~ ~~~~'.,..REPRESENTATIVE: "°~ ~ .~r ~~ ~~~~ ` ~ ° ~ a ~ ~ }~ ~ ~~ ' ~ 7_ ; i ~ - ^ j k f, .F. =~« u i~ .~~ ~ ~ ~, r; a } ~ • I j i li, '~ ~II i f ~I ~d ~ i I `~ ~ ~. ; ~ Ili ~ ',' I ~ ~~ ~~ I ~ II ~ I I ~~~~ d r ~~i ~ ' ~ ~ ~~ ~ li i ~ ~, ' ; ~ 6 I ( '~ I i~ ! ' ~ II ; ~ ~ I' r ~ j{ ~ !III ~ ' ' ~ ! ' ~'~ ~ '~ I~! ; k I j FUNDING RE UES S FROM HU ~i ~ ~ I ~~ I ~ I I I I~ 1i ~ ~~ !, il,~ , ~ ' r ! I, ~ i I~I~I .III I ;,, ~ ~ j ~ SOCIAL AND CUL tJRAL AGEN ~ ~~ I ~ $~I I i ii, ~ l ~ Il, ; r 4 I ~~ -~I ~ ~ ~ ' ~,~I ~ I' r ~ ; ~ I 'I ~ APPEARAN E REQUES i i I', ~~i t ~!'~ ~91~ ~ p ~ ~,li' I;I,, j. :'ll y ~ ;I I II i ' Chairman of the Board of Sue i r t so s o reco nize p 9 ~ ' I II ~ ~ I tier so that I may comment. I l u~ l, II ~' d 1 l I ~, I ' '' ED TO THE L ~. ECTERN, I W/ L GI VE MY NA ~ i i l 9 I I II ~! , CORD. /AGREE TO AB/D BY THE GU/DE ' , , ~ I '~~i I~ II I I ~~ pecker will be iven three minutes to comment wheth F 9 ~ ~~ I , '! CI ~ j al or representative. The Chairm n will decide the ti I I, ~'I r of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the r ~ I I ~ I ~' ~brity of the Board to do otherwise.ll ~ ~ ~~ ' ~~ ~ i ;, Baker will be limited to a resentatlon of his/her oint p ~ p '~ ~ , ~', ' # lion may be entertained by the Ch~~lairman. I,~, ~ ~~ i ' , , rnents must be directed to the Board. Debate betwee ~, ~ ~ ~ j thence members is not allowed. f I~ ~ i ~ II ~y ~ j 'I ~ ~ II I ~,~ I fakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all t I I ' l ~ ~ ~ i w ; I I i rs are re uested to leave an writ en statements and/ q Y ~ ,, ' ;;I ~ , ~ ~ ~ I I ~, ; ' ~ # B he oard. ~ I ~ ~~ I', ;I', , ~~ I~~ , I, ~, ~ PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIV TO THE CLER I ~ ~ ' ~ it Y: L ~ n ~ A'N;t~IL2 C.C/~t, I , ~~ I I ~ ri ~ l ~ qF REPRESENTATIVE: ~ ~ C,~l~-c-L C~-S-~ ~ I '~ I I~ ~ „~ , l ~ i l I i ~ ~] ~S. ~ l-~ ~ 1 ~ ~ (~~ ~„~ I r j III ~ I t iu~~ . 1 il I ~ I i I ~ d I h u!{ ~~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ I' ~ ~ II . ~ , m I ,~ ~~ ,, ~~ ~ ~, I ,a i~~ I, ,~ ~, ~ I ~ ; ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~~~ ~~ I~ I ~ ~,~ ~ ,II ~ I ~ , I , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ I ;"~ ' I ~I i 1, ! ! i ~~ t I ~ ~ f i ~ FUND/N _ G REQUESTS FROM HUMANa I il I i ~ _ ''I I ~I II ~ SOCIAL AND CULTURAL AGENCIES 'I II I~ , ~ ~ ~ ','~, ~ ~ ~ APP EARANCE R EQUEST ~ I I ~ ~~ ! IIII '~~~ ~ ~ i I' , wquld like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during th ~~~ ~ , ~ or ~ the above matter so that I may comment. ~~ 'II I ~ ~~ ~ i , , W QN CALLED TO THE L ECTER N, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND A FO~t !ITHE RECORD. /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GUIDELINES L/S ~ ~ ~~'~ ~ i I ~ • ' Each s eak r ~ e wi II be iven three mi p nutes to comment wh g ethers eakin p 9 I . ,,, `°' : ~ individual or re resen tative. p The Chairman will decide the time limi t ba e s b f n ~ ~ : ~ ~ ~ , , num er o citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless bye the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ~ ( f ,'~, , • ',The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her oint of view onl p y. o ~ clarifi cati on ma be entertai ne d b the Chairm Y y an. l i I , ~~ , • All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recogniz , ~I i ~- and audience members is not allowed. ~ I ~ I ~ ~~ '~ ~ ~ j • ', .Both s Bakers and the audience wi p II exercise courtesy at all times. I ~ ~ ~~ ~ I ~ i i I' ~ • Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments ~t ~ ~ I Clerk to the Board. II i ! I ~ IIIIII I M'LEASE PRINT L EGIBLY A ND GI VE T O THE CLER K TO T HE 4GENCY: ~ ~1 ~I ~', NAME OF REPRESENTATIVE: ~~~'/~ `~id~~.~~~ I I '~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~I~ ~„ ~; ADDRESS: ~~ ~ X ~~~ --~ /' / ~~ ~ ~ ~ `~,~ ~ ~~~/`7 ~-'I~ ~~`T S ~i ~ ~ ~I , PHONE: ~ ~,% ~ ~ ( v ~ ~~ ~ ~~ I I , ; { ~~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~--- ~~ , a' 'I ~~ I k ! ~ 'I I Citizens Recognizing Center in the Square's Benefits to Roanoke County Resolution WHEREAS, in December 1983, Center in the Squaze opened to a weekend audience of 40,000 citizens, primarily from Roanoke County, Roanoke City, and Salem; and WHEREAS, Center in the "Squaze serves more than one-half million visitors including thousands of Roanoke County citizens annually; and WHEREAS, Center in the Square has become known for its excellence as a facilitator for educational services, economic development, and improvements in the region's quality of life; and WHEREAS, Center in the Square is vital to the Roanoke County schools and its children as a center for education; and WHEREAS, Center in the Squaze serves as a destination to thousands of tourists who concurrently add to the retail sales base of Roanoke County businesses; and WHEREAS, Center in the Squaze has recently been recognized by the International Downtown Association as the number one economic development project in the world recognizing its impact on the region's economy; and WHEREAS, many Roanoke County citizens, businesses, and educators are supportive of Center in the Square's mission and recognize its benefits to Roanoke County residents; NO L~ THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the citizens who signed below express their support for Center in the Square and acknowledge the financial support granted Center in the Squaze by Roanoke County and express appreciation to Roanoke County for this support; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the citizens signed below encourage Roanoke County to continue its financial support of Center in the Square and, furthermore, encourage Roan County to increase its financial support of Center in the Square to be commensurate with the many benefits enjoyed by the County and the thor of County residents who participate in Center activities. Citizens of Roanoke County Name Address '// ~~~~ ~' r ., ~o~ ~a~~ ° ~ ~ai~ ~~~ ,. J Inn I^' 'u•' ~ l W I ` 1 ~?'~,, 9•; ° DIY'. CP,l~~' ~~ ~ . C~ ~/~/~ ~ ~'~l ~r,~.Y~y ,~lL~ ~ e ~ ~~~ 14. ~~~'''-~''1 ~ , !/il-a-o~4~- ~ 5 a 3 l~o l~ ccv ~~'t ~ ~e. ~~ 15. J.L~t..v~~et/ ~~ ~.eJ ~©~ S ~,/(~i:.~ri~ ~ .SkJ l `~'z`~ ~~-~- ls. ~ 33~ ~ R.n 19. ~.c~--~/ ~~Q. cal-ti,~-~.~ ~~ ~~ CQ~~-~-~ .7 Citizens Recognizing Center in the Square's Benefits to Roanoke County Resolution TVHEREAS, in December 1983, Center in the Square opened to a weekend audience of 40,000 citizens, primarily from Roanoke County, Roanoke City, and Salem; and ~fIEREAS, Center in the Square serves more than one-half million visitors including thousands of Roanoke County citizens annually; and TVHEREAS, Center in the Square has become known for its excellence as a facilitator for educational services, economic development, and improvements in the region's quality of life; and WIIEREAS, Center in the Square is vital to the Roanoke County schools and its children as a center for education; and WHEREAS, Center in the Square serves as a destination to thousands of tourists who concurrently add to the retail sales base of Roanoke County businesses; and WHEREAS, Center in the Squaze has recently been recognized by the International Downtown Association as the number one economic development project in the world recognizing its impact on the region's economy; and WHEREAS, many Roanoke County citizens, businesses, and educators are supportive of Center in the Square's mission and recognize its benefits to Roanoke County residents; NOTE THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the citizens who signed below express their support for Center in the Squaze and acknowledge the financial support granted Center in the Squaze by Roanoke County and express appreciation to Roanoke County for this support; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the citizens signed below encourage Roanoke County to continue its financial support of Center in the Squaze and, furthermore, encourage Roanoke County to increase its financial support of Center in the Square to be commensurate with the many benefits enjoyed by the County and the thousands of County residents who participate in Center activities. 4 Citizens of Roanoke County Name .. ~ w~.- ,,~,~„ Address a~~ ~~ ~ 9~ ~ B ~Gk ~o+•~ ~ o X34 d I~I~r(i ~ ~ ciCti~ 5. G. ~. ~ ~~ 9. ~ Cam' ~~ 10~~ ~~~5~ ?968 Ir-~a~sr~RC-~~~ ~ 2`~~~g 311 1~9ak«,AY ~. ~~ ~o~~~-tr 2~io~Y ia. ~l..~tc~c (d~~"'L~"G32 ~(~u~act~C, tus~y ~4.~~~u~.GQw-c IoJGS j~eraQ(rsc~GL192. ls. /~~/~."~or~ s'8'3s" Penn ~,utPl sn AQ . / _ 16. 17. 240 ~s~ y4o~d ?~d l9~ ~y~ ~ 8' ~~i ~ ~ ~~~ 19. " / ~~K ~'4~/4 ~ U~ c~2 0 S'"' Ft ~wT~L/'G ~~ a~ ~e ~~ 20. .S~s~s"y ,~l,G~gG~ !~2 o~4~0I f ~' 3 ~ ~~ ~~ ,~y,~'~~ y4~ 18. ~ ~ ~, ~~ ~~e/ / S'~-'~ `l~ ~T~~l~Rvo~ Jag. .y~33 k w. ~~ ~.~ ! ~-'~° ~ 4~ 2J~01$ mat 7/ ~i~,/r~/6 ,~l~f m~'. a ~o r~ ~S~b P~ ~~ ~6 P~ , Z4~ l~ 3y~ LAS ~c`L C• ~ ~a+~' z Citizens Recognizing Center in the Square's Benefits to Roanoke County Resolution WHERF.~I.S, in December 1983, Center in the Squaze opened to a weekend audience of 40,000 citizens, primazily from Roanoke County, Roanoke City, and Salelii?; and WHEREAS, Center in the Squaze serves more than one-half million visitors including thousands of Roanoke County citizens annually; and WHEREAS, Center in the Squaze has become known for its excellence as a facilitator for educational services, economic development, and improvements in the region's quality of life; and WHEREAS, Center in the Square is vital to the Roanoke County schools and its children as a center for education; and WHEREAS, Center in the Squaze serves as a destination to thousands of tourists who concurrently add to the retail sales base of Roanoke County businesses; and WHEREAS, Center in the Squaze has recently been recognized by the International Downtown Association as the number one economic development project in the world recognizing its impact on the region's economy; and WHEREAS, many Roanoke County citizens, businesses, and educators are supportive of Center in the Squaze's mission and recognize its benefits to Roanoke County residents; NOw THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the citizens who signed below express their support for Center in the Squaze and acknowledge the financial support granted Center in the Square by Roanoke County and express appreciation to Roanoke County for this support; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the citizens signed below encourage Roanoke County to continue its financial support of Center in the Squaze and, furthermore, encourage Roanoke County to increase its financial support of Center in the Squaze to be commensurate with the many benefits enjoyed by the County and the thousands of County residents who participate in Center activities. Citizens of Roanoke County Name Address ~7 ~/ /~ , ~ ~ ,~,~-ecrJ1 ~ ~ 0 ~ 2~-~ Czv~ ~,~~;~o~--~ ~~ ~~ 1 ~ ~~ ~~~ li~ 1 ~ ~ /~ ,(,, ~ , f G~~-~IJ° ~ ~ ~~ ~c~~ ,~~~~ ~/ ~~ ~~r, ~. ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~. `? ,/ z ~ z ~ Fri rss ~ Dn Ra~ol~ ~ Z ~o~~ 8. 9. ~ °~ ~/ ~°n~ ~-'Y-S ,~J~ . r yam'' ~~ 02 ~/~3 10. ~Z~SS ~~~"~ ` ~~ 11. ~~c~ / 1 j. ' 14. G~-~ ~~ 15. ~~~~%R ~nl~~rR,d ~=~~~ ~UL~S~.' rrN~~7~o~ V~~ ~~~~9 1~~~ `~ ~,= r l ' G (~