The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About3/27/2001 - Regular~ (lOANp~.~ r~xrarn~ecue,¢mrt~ ti ~ ~ ~ ~ 1838 / ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION AGENDA MARCH 27, 2001 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m. on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. The meetings are broadcast live on RVTV, Channel 3, will be rebroadcast on Thursdays at 7 P.M. and Saturdays at 4 p.m., and are now closed captioned Individuals who require assistance or special arrangements to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings should contact the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772-2005 at least 48 hours in advance so reasonable accommodations may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call ALL PRESENT AT 3:04 P.M. 2. Invocation: The Reverend Keith Beasley Good Shepherd Lutheran Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS ECH ADDED INTRODUCTION OF DOUGLAS CHITTUM NEW ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR~C-1~ PMM ADDED CLOSED MEETING ITEM -DISCUSSION OF SALE OF LLOYD PROPERTY ITEM U-1) 1 ® Recycled Paper JBC ADDED A WORK SESSION ON COMMERCIAL AND PRIVATE STABLES ITEM O-4 C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Introduction of new Economic Development Director Douglas Chittum. (Elmer Hodge, County Administrator) MR. CHITTUM WAS INTRODUCED. ALSO PRESENT -WILL DAVIS AEP AND ROB LEDGER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP D. BRIEFINGS Report on Housing Recommendations by the Senior and Challenged Citizens Commission. (Debbie Pitts, Assistant Director of Recreation) PRESENTED BY DEBBIE PITTS. REPORT REFERRED TO ECH AND STAFF TO REVIEW COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATIONS. E. NEW BUSINESS Request for additional Fire and Rescue Staffing. (Rick Burch, Fire and Rescue Chief) A-032701-1 BLJ MOTION TO AUTHORIZE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO MOVE FORWARD WITH ADVERTISEMENTS FOR 15 POSITIONS - URC HCN MOTION THAT SOURCE OF FUNDING COME FROM IMPLEMENTATION OF FEE FOR SERVICE AND IN THE INTERIM AUTHORIZE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO USE THE AUDITED YEAR-END SURPLUS. AYES-BLJ,JBC HCN HOM NAYS-JPM 4 CITIZENS SPOKE 2. Request for endorsement of transfer of administrative responsibilities for the Housing Choice (Section 8) Voucher Program from Virginia 2 Housing Development Authority to TAP/Blue Ridge Housing Development Corporation. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) A-032701-2 BLJ MOTION TO ENDORSE TRANSFER TO TAP/BLUE RIDGE HOUSING URC 3. Request to approve the consolidation of Starkey, Merriman, and the New South County Park into one facility to be named Starkey Park. Postponed from February 27 2001) (Pete Haislip, Director of Parks, Recreation and Tourism. A-032701-3 HOM MOTION TO APPROVE CONSOLIDATION OF PARKS AND NAMING OF STARKEY PARK URC 4. Request for approval of funding to help light the large baseball field at the new South County Park. (Pete Haislip, Director of Parks, Recreation and Tourism) A-032701-4 JPM MOTION TO _APPROVE FUNDING OF $25 000 FROM CAPITAL ACCOUNT WITH CAPITAL ACCOUNT BEING REIMBURSED FROM ANY SETTLEMENT WITH VIRGINIA GAS PIPELINE. URC 5. Consideration of the acquisition of additional shares of ownership in the New River Valley Commerce Park. (Jill Barr, Assistant Director of Economic Development) A-032701-5 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE ACQUISITION OF ADDITIONAL SHARES URC 6. Consideration of bid protest of Heimann Systems concerning x-ray security equipment for Roanoke County. (Joseph Obenshain, Senior Assistant County Attorney) R-032701-6 BLJ MOTION TO ADOPT RESO DENYING BID PROTEST URC HCN REQUESTED THAT THIS ISSUE BE DISCUSSED IN CLOSED MEETING 3 F. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA: Approval of these items does not indicate support for, or judge the merits of, the requested zoning actions but satisfies procedural requirements and schedules the Public Hearings which will be held after recommendation by the Planning Commission. WITHDRAWN BY THE PETITIONER 1. First reading of ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit to operate a convenience store on 1.612 acres located at 3752 Challenger Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Go-Mart, Inc. G. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. First reading of ordinance amending Chapter 15 of the Roanoke County Code prohibiting the flying of any aircraft including motorized and non-motorized remote control planes, helicopters, and gliders in public parks without a County Parks & Recreation Permit. (Pete Haislip, Director of Parks, Recreation and Tourism) HCN MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND - 4/10/01 2. First reading of ordinance to approve the purchase and financing of the Salem Bank & Trust Building. (Diane Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer) HCN MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND _ 4/10/01 AYES-JPM.JBC HCN HOM ABSTAIN-BLJ 3. First reading of ordinance authorizing a Special Sewer Service Area/Reimbursement Agreement for the Hanging Rock Commercial District. (Gary Robertson, Utility Director) 4 JBC MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING 2ND _ 4/10/01 URC H. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES I. APPOINTMENTS 1. League of Older Americans Advisory Council 2. Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission JBC NOMINATED RICHARD KELLEY TO ANOTHER THREE-YEAR TERM EXPIRING APRIL 8 2004. 3. Social Services Advisory Board J. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. R-032701-7 HCN MOTION TO ADOPT CONSENT RESO URC 1. Request from Schools to accept and appropriate $2,000 grant to cover expenses for 2000-2001 regional superintendents and judges meeting. A-032701-7.a 2. Request from Schools to accept and appropriate $20,000 grant from Carillon Community Health Fund to the School Nurse Program. A-032701-7. b 5 3. Donation of New Pump Station Lot #1 in connection with the Read Mountain Water System from F & W Community Development Corporation. A-032701-7.c 4. Authorization to Donate surplus vehicles to Explore Park. A-032701-7.d 5. Donation of two sanitary sewer easements on Lots 12 and 13 and Lots 14 and 15, Section 18, Woodbridge in the Catawba Magisterial District from Waldrop Development Corporation. A-032701-7.e K. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS 1. Request for work session on May 8, 2001 to discuss potential mountain/ridge development ordinance. (Janet Scheid, Senior Planner) WORK SESSION SCHEDULED FOR MAY 8 2001 2. Request for joint budget work session with School Board on April 10, 2001. WORK SESSION SCHEDULE FOR APRIL 10 2001 ECH ADVISED THERE WOULD BE AN EVENING SESSION L. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS NONE M. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS NONE 6 N. REPORTS HCN MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE AFTER DISCUSSION OF ITEMS 7 AND 9-URC 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Future School Capital Reserve 5. Statement of Treasurer's Accountability per Investment and Portfolio Policy as of February 28, 2001 6. Changes to the VDOT Secondary System in February 2001 7. Consent Judgement and Decree granting Roanoke County's Request for exemption from coverage pursuant to Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act 8. Revenues and Expenditures for the eight months ended February 28, 2001 9. Status Report on the redistricting process O. WORK SESSIONS (4T" FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM) 1. Proposed amendments to the Street Light Policy HELD FROM 5:30 TO 5:50 P.M. PRESENTED BY ARNOLD COVEY GEORGE SIMPSON AND TODD BOOTH 7 2. Update on WEB Site Redesign and eGovernment Initiative HELD FROM 5:50 - 6:10 P.M. PRESENTED BY ELAINE CARVER AND ELTON GEE 3. Budget Work Session NOT HELD -CONTINUED TO APRIL 10. 2001 4. Work Session on private and commercial stables N_OT HELD -CONTINUED TO APRIL 10,2001 P. CLOSED MEETING pursuant to Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (3) sale of publicly owned property, i.e. Salem Office Supply, and well lot; 2.1- 344 A (5) economic development prospect where no previous announcement has been made; 2.1-344 A (3) sale of publicly owned property, Lloyd Property; and 2.1-344 A (7) discussion with legal counsel concerning bid protest (Item E-6) HOM MOTION TO GO INTO CLOSED MEETING FOLLOWING WORK SESSIONS AT 5:25 P.M. URC CLOSED MEETING HELD FROM 6:15 P.M. TO 6:55 P.M. EVENING SESSION (7:00 P.M.~ Q. CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION R-032701-8 BLJ MOTION TO ADOPT CERTIFICATION RESO -URC U. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance accepting an offer for and authorizing the sale of 37.86 acres of real estate located in the City of Salem -The Lloyd Property, Tax Map No. 194-1-1. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) (ACTION CONTINUED FROM 3-13-01~ 8 0-032701-9 JBC MOTION TO ADOPT ORD ACCEPTING-OFFER FROM CHRISTIAN LIFE FELLOWSHIP FOR $984,000 URC R. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Recognition of the Roanoke Moose Lodge #284 for their donations to Roanoke County and the Catawba Community. R-032701-10 JBC MOTION TO ADOPT RESO -URC ACCEPTED BY KENNETH ROBINETTE .KEN WRIGHT AND J C MORRIS MOOSE LODGE #284 2. Resolution of Congratulations to George Thomas "Tommy" Morgan for an outstanding football season and being named to the all-state first teams, Group AA and Defensive Player of the Year. R-032701-11 BLJ MOTION TO ADOPT RESO -URC TOMMY MORGAN WAS PRESENT TO ACCEPT RESO 3, Resolution of Congratulations to the Cave Spring High School Swim Team for winning the State Group AAA Championship for the second consecutive year. R-032701-12 BLJ MOTION TO ADOPT RESO URC S. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Public Hearing to elicit citizen comment for items to be included in the budget for the 2001-2002 fiscal year. 2. Public Hearing on the "effective tax rate increase" as a result of increased assessed value of real estate. 1 CITIZEN SPOKE IN OPPOSITION TO ANY INCREASE IN TAXES. 9 3. Public Hearing to elicit citizen comment to set the following tax rates in Roanoke County. a. To set a real estate tax rate of not more than $1.13 per $100 assessed valuation . b. To set a personal property tax rate of not more than $3.50 per $100 assessed valuation. c. To set a machinery and tools tax rate of not more than $3.00 per $100 assessed valuation. 4. Public Hearing to elicit citizen comment on the issuance of general obligations school bonds of the County in an estimated maximum amount of $16,500,000 for Hidden Valley High School, Glenvar Middle School and Roof Repairs and adoption of a resolution. R-032701-13 JPM MOTION TO ADOPT RESO URC T. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Second Reading of ordinance to rezone 200 acres from R-1 Residential District to AG-3 Agriculture and Rural Preserve District for a commercial stable located on 5350 Poor Mountain Road, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Judy Gustafson. 0-032701-14 JBC MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC 2. Second reading of ordinance to rezone 4.369 acres from AG-1 Agriculture, to AR, Agricultural Residential to construct new single family houses located at 1114 Skyview Road (Route 755), Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of W. F. Walker. JBC MOTION TO D_E_LAY ACTION TO APRIL 10 2001 URC 3. Second reading of ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit to operate an Automobile Dealership, Used on 1.4088 acres located at 3328 Peters Creek Road, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the 10 petition of Marc I. Wilson. 0-032701-15 JBC MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC 4. Second reading of ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit for a private stable on 13.4 acres located with a proposed access in the 1400 block of Carlos Drive (Route 616), Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Larry E. Huffman. 0-032701-16 BLJ MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC 5. Second reading of ordinance to rezone 4.068 acres from R-3, Medium Density Residential with conditions to R-3, Medium Density Residential with amended conditions, property located at the intersection of Cave Spring Lane and Old Cave Spring Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the petition of Jeffrey S. Maronic. 0-032701-17 JPM MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC V. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS 1. Robert Johnson, opposed to allocation of fire and rescue personnel that do not result in the reopening of Bent Mountain station 2. Alan Gleiner, pleased with Phase 2 but concerned that there is still no fire and rescue personnel at Bent Mountain during daylight hours 3. Annie Krochalis, presented petitions with 250 signatures Expressed support for Phase 1 and 2 and requested that Chief Burch meet with the Bent Mountain Civic League to discuss Phase 2 and explain fee for service 4. James Garris, expressed concern at the comments by the Board members to Delegate Griffith's comments at the last meeting and felt it was time for belt ti htening measures not increases in taxes and fees W. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS 11 Supervisor Church: pointed out that the Board handled several major issues todav. He noted that they were pulled from all ends of the spectrum but they are unable to put people at every station over night Supervisor Nickens: (1) Commended John Chambliss for his comments to the Senate Finance Committee concerning funding for manx programs especially the Juvenile Detention Center (2) He expressed some hope for more funding based on the Governor's comments today Supervisor Minnix: ~1) Announced that the Working Committee for the Leadership Summit will meet at the Roanoke Civic Center (2) Advised that Judge Swanson's Swearing in Ceremony will be held March 28 at the Roanoke County Courthouse with a reception following X. ADJOURNMENT HOM ADJOURNED MEETING AT 8:45 P.M. 12 ~ (tOANp, f ~nFr oe rr~ eua rt~ce F ~ 9 ~ ~ 1838 / ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA MARCH 27, 2001 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m. on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. The meetings are broadcast live on RVTV, Channel 3, will be rebroadcast on Thursdays at 7 P.M. and Saturdays at 4 p.m.. and are now closed captioned. Individuals who require assistance or special arrangements to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings should contact the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772-2005 at least 48 hours in advance so reasonable accommodations may be made. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call 2. Invocation: The Reverend Keith Beasley Good Shepherd Lutheran Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Ftag B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS D. BRIEFINGS 1. Report on Housing Recommendations by the Senior and Challenged Citizens Commission. (Debbie Pitts, Assistant Director of Recreation) E. NEW BUSINESS i ® Recycled Paper 1. Request for additional Fire and Rescue Staffing. (Rick Burch, Fire and Rescue Chief) 2. Request for endorsement of transfer of administrative responsibilities for the Housing Choice (Section 8) Voucher Program from Virginia Housing Development Authority to TAP/Blue Ridge Housing Development Corporation. (Terry Harrington, County Planner) 3. Request to approve the consolidation of Starkey, Merriman, and the New South County Park into one facility to be named Starkey Park. (Postponed from February 27, 2001) (Pete Haislip, Director of Parks, Recreation and Tourism. 4. Request for approval of funding to help light the large baseball field at the new South County Park. (Pete Haislip, Director of Parks, Recreation and Tourism) 5. Consideration of the acquisition of additional shares of ownership in the New River Valley Commerce Park. (Jill Barr, Assistant Director of Economic Development) 6. Consideration of bid protest of Heimann Systems concerning x-ray security equipment for Roanoke County. (Joseph Obenshain, Senior Assistant County Attorney) F. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA: Approval of these items does not indicate support for, or judge the merits of, the requested zoning actions but satisfies procedural requirements and schedules the Public Hearings which will be held after recommendation by the Planning Commission. 1. First reading of ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit to operate a convenience store on 1.612 acres located at 3752 Challenger Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Go-Mart, Inc. G. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. First reading of ordinance amending Chapter 15 of the Roanoke County Code prohibiting the flying of any aircraft including motorized and non-motorized remote control planes, helicopters, and gliders in 2 public parks without a County Parks & Recreation Permit. (Pete Haislip, Director of Parks, Recreation and Tourism) 2. First reading of ordinance to approve the purchase and financing of the Salem Bank & Trust Building. (Diane Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer) 3. First reading of ordinance authorizing a Special Sewer Service Area/Reimbursement Agreement for the Hanging Rock Commercial District. (Gary Robertson, Utility Director) H. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES I. APPOINTMENTS 1. League of Older Americans Advisory Council 2. Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission 3. Social Services Advisory Board J. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Request from Schools to accept and appropriate $2,000 grant to cover expenses for 2000-2001 regional superintendents and judges meeting. 2. Request from Schools to accept and appropriate $20,000 grant from Carillon Community Health Fund to the School Nurse Program. 3. Donation of New Pump Station Lot #1 in connection with the Read Mountain Water System from F & W Community Development Corporation. 4. Authorization to Donate surplus vehicles to Explore Park. 3 5. Donation of two sanitary sewer easements on Lots 12 and 13 and Lots 14 and 15, Section 18, Woodbridge in the Catawba Magisterial District from Waldrop Development Corporation. i'1 L. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS 1. Request for work session on May 8, 2001 to discuss potential mountain/ridge development ordinance. (Janet Scheid, Senior Planner) 2. Request for joint budget work session with School Board on April 10, 2001. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS M. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS N. REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Future School Capital Reserve 5. Statement of Treasurer's Accountability per Investment and Portfolio Policy as of February 28, 2001 6. Changes to the VDOT Secondary System in February 2001 7. Consent Judgement and Decree granting Roanoke County's Request for exemption from coverage pursuant to Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act 8. Revenues and Expenditures for the eight months ended February 28, 2001 9. Status Report on the redistricting process 4 O. WORK SESSIONS (4T" FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM) 1. Proposed amendments to the Street Light Policy 2. Update on WEB Site Redesign and eGovernment Initiative 3. Budget Work Session P. CLOSED MEETING pursuant to Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (3) sale of publicly owned property, i.e. Salem Office Supply, and well lot; 2.1- 344 A (5) economic development prospect where no previous announcement has been made. EVENING SESSION (7:00 P.M.) Q. CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION R. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS 1. Recognition of the Roanoke Moose Lodge #284 for their donations to Roanoke County and the Catawba Community. 2. Resolution of Congratulations to George Thomas "Tommy" Morgan for an outstanding football season and being named to the all-state first teams, Group AA and Defensive Player of the Year. 3, Resolution of Congratulations to the Cave Spring High School Swim Team for winning the State Group AAA Championship for the second consecutive year. S. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Public Hearing to elicit citizen comment for items to be included in the budget for the 2001-2002 fiscal year. 2. Public Hearing on the "effective tax rate increase" as a result of increased assessed value of real estate. 3. Public Hearing to elicit citizen comment to set the following tax rates in Roanoke County. 5 a. To set a real estate tax rate of not more than $1.13 per $100 assessed valuation . b. To set a personal property tax rate of not more than $3.50 per $100 assessed valuation. c. To set a machinery and tools tax rate of not more than $3.00 per $100 assessed valuation. 4. Public Hearing to elicit citizen comment on the issuance of general obligations school bonds of the County in an estimated maximum amount of $16,500,00 for Hidden Valley High School, Glenvar Middle School and Roof Repairs and adoption of a resolution. T. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Second Reading of ordinance to rezone 200 acres from R-1 Residential District to AG-3 Agriculture and Rural Preserve District for a commercial stable located on 5350 Poor Mountain Road, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Judy Gustafson. 2. Second reading of ordinance to rezone 4.369 acres from AG-1 Agriculture, to AR, Agricultural Residential to construct new single family houses located at 1114 Skyview Road (Route 755), Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of W. F. Walker. 3. Second reading of ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit to operate an Automobile Dealership, Used on 1.4088 acres located at 3328 Peters Creek Road, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Marc I. Wilson. 4. Second reading of ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit for a private stable on 13.4 acres located with a proposed access in the 1400 block of Carlos Drive (Route 616), Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Larry E. Huffman. 5. Second reading of ordinance to rezone 4.068 acres from R-3, Medium Density Residential with conditions to R-3, Medium Density Residential with amended conditions, property located at the intersection of Cave Spring Lane and Old Cave Spring Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the petition of Jeffrey S. 6 Maronic. U. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Ordinance accepting an offer for and authorizing the sale of 37.86 acres of real estate located in the City of Salem -The Lloyd Property, Tax Map No. 194-1-1. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) (ACTION CONTINUED FROM 3-13-01) V. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS W. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS X. ADJOURNMENT 7 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER "` AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 27, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: Senior and Challenged Citizen Commission Housing Recommendation COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: /~ ~~,,,t/ ~, ~~~ BACKGROUND: In 1997, the Board of Supervisors appointed the Commission for Senior and Challenged Citizens to review problems encountered by senior adults and individuals with disabilities in Roanoke County and to make recommendations to the Board for consideration. The Commission has made recommendations for improvements in the Special Education section of Roanoke County Schools, increasing publicity for the CORTRAN transportation service, closed captioning of Board meetings, and has been working with staff to improve ADA compliance within Roanoke County. We have produced two public service videos and hope to start on the third in the near future. Over the last year, we have studied the availability of affordable and accessible housing in Roanoke County and respectfully submit the attached report for your review and consideration for possible future action. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: During the last year the Commission has reviewed the assisted living and nursing home inventory in Roanoke County, met with several community agencies to review housing issues, and met with the Community Development Department on several occasions. The Commission concluded from this study that the County might need more rental, accessible, and affordable housing for low to moderate income households. However, we were not able to determine the actual need and recommend that the Planning Department together with human service agencies in the region conduct a needs assessment on the need for, the feasibility of, and the desirability of increasing the stock of affordable and accessible housing in Roanoke County. The attached report outlines several opportunities for your consideration when housing, planning, and zoning issues are under consideration. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Commission respectfully requests your consideration of this recommendation to improve the availability of affordable and accessible housing for individuals with disabilities and for low to moderate income households. We recommend that a needs assessment be conducted to determine the need for, the feasibility of, and the desirability of increasing the stock of affordable and accessible housing in Roanoke County. ~- i Respectfully submitted, Approved by, Debbie Pitts Assistant Director of Recreation ACTION Approved () Motion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator VOTE No Yes Abs Church _ Johnson _ _ _ McNamara Minnix _ _ _ Nickens SENIOR AND CHALLENGED CITIZEN'S COMMISSION HOUSING RECOMMENDATIONS 1. It appears that the County needs more rental housing (especially 3 &4 bedroom) and affordable housing for low to moderate income households. (The County also needs more accessible housing units for individuals with disabilities.) This need is in multi-unit, as well as single unit, housing. 2. We therefore request your action to direct the Roanoke County Planning Department together with Blue Ridge Housing Development Corporation and using consultant services to develop an assessment on the need for, the feasibility of, and the desirability of a affordable housing in Roanoke County. This should target low and middle-income citizens who do not qualify for subsidies. Public service announcements could aid in determining this. 3. We urge you to have staff contact agencies to research programs and funding options available to develop affordable housing for County citizens who are elderly/disabled and to present recommendations to the Board. 4. We recommend that action be taken by the County to encourage developers applying for permits to build multiple single family units or multi-family units, of housing to build apre-approved percentage of units to meet federal accessibility standards. 5. We request that the minimum lot size requirements be reviewed and selectively reduced so that the Planning Department can encourage developers to construct smaller houses to increase the stock of affordable housing. 6. Builders of multi-unit housing should be heartily encouraged to utilize the federal tax credit program. 7. Request Blue Ridge Housing Development Authority to become our public sector developer of affordable housing, using such units as are available under Title 202 and those available under the Federal Home Bank Loan. 8. Invite the City Housing Authority into a joint partnership for developing affordable/accessible housing via revenue bonds. 95% of the money can be borrowed, using HUD insurance. 9. Explore a joint venture with private businesses to develop an assisted living center, which would be affordable to citizens unable to pay the rates at existing facilities. Governor Gilmore now has a special unit working on assisted living. 10. Focus on, fund, and "promote the development" of services that promote independent living arrangements for citizens who are elderly or have disabilities. 11. Fund or increase the "funding to the agencies that provide " independent living support services for Roanoke County residents. 12. If a need is determined, we urge Roanoke County to pursue an organized project utilizing Federal and State funding. Consider offering a subsidized rental program for residents utilizing a sliding scale for rents. 13. Encourage Federal and State legislation to allow Roanoke County to qualify for funding (Community Block Funding Grant). D-~ •~} - ;' ,. ~{~} d ~4'~ i 1`~'~ i alr i?L`T.~L~..iM1lt L 1 ~Y iJ~ ~T 1~ .4 w "IT.I ~i i?i~,'1£!7'177)('1;i t`~,i hi'i.,+1 ~7rilti7iil'!.i •~<'1'1';L`f'.1' it tr. k'.d~.:,:clii:ni. ': ±i['. (t:'ki i'''•'`'~~;~~'''~' ': BR:\1'913LE'I'{JN {'0121'{)1211'17: C:EN'17~12 3433 BI2A4.113LET'(~N AVEI\lE ftC~rli~C7K>v, VIRGINIA 211)18 'I'(, ~Vlluno ([ M:Iti' ('tinct:rn: ll has bccn kuough[ til uur:utcntiem that the: kesanok.c Ctsunty Cotntnissinn for Senior ati.l ('halleugecl C'itizenti is iti IHc lic~ee\ti i,l rtiaksn~; rei:otrmiund<ttitias cnne~rnitir; :iflixdable, accessible haaising ill Koonokc Cnunt;i..1~ th:: l2c~anoke Fi^hi C)ffice. 1'iir the. 1'irginia fk:pxrirnctli of R4ht,bilit;ttivc Sc:r: i[:cs, •~ae: cannot ~:mnhasi•r..c enough tllc: nt~cd for sueh hottitl~~ itt [ti~allr,ke Ca3unty. !\U o1'the counselcars ut the Ittt<uloke l~ieltl C.)fi'ic•e~ have.:it one. ume car anathcr. bc4n tttcctl with the. ctilcmttta of inclividui[Is Lvtth dtsabthitcs to ncccl oi' accessible hcausing. In :[)most all al' thine. eases, the inch': ideals u•cr[: urtt[blc: tea find alsltrnlsri<ue uitl a[f~cnrlsble li•: ing Cluirierti in the QiGlit}'. 'l'Itis is Mitt jowl tt li:ulaletn ftir the dial>'sec+. Ix~p[tlation, hlu its the populatitan in general emu's olelcr, this •~~~ilt I>ecante. a tnajcar cotlccrn for the cntir~, conununity, Pccspie :L~,InI let Cclfl<[itl :a indclxntlc:nt «s I,o:,;ikilc:; Itol,sine is the: ulaiti issue; itt tll.:ir biin~ abla: w dtt stn. 7'llis ittllst,rt>ml is.susn Ittust he ad;[res.~c:d in nrst::r Iha[ Imusing, flit seniC>r Citi7.calti antl perst)Ilti L~,ith disallailitiea be. midi. in~itilahle, nat O[71V IlOl4', hll[ In Chl' luture- It' }•~,u hu:,ld h:r:cr ;u,y ittrtlsesr tl[sGSlic>ns ;xnlci:rnin~ thr I)els;t+.?nlrn?'c ::xpt:ri[:nt:rs LL•ilh [his impottruit issue. 1?lease. call rn4 itt (SYU} '""(a•?? t 5. l Lvoulc he ~*lad to sl;~ak v:•ith ;.roe or IIUt'C CUI' ee,[tt15i'li?I'S speak Lvilh }'ou. Sln.erily, ~~ ~ ~ ,' _, Tani J1;unillon t-tnllian Seri: ices 47anaecr Rt)anc,3:c: Picltl (~11ic;: . :Ili .i~tidta i)tirt:t177~ LL 1P!!izr:!ftl: :?o'tif,~ll ::Nt~7illa,:.- A-032701-1 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 27, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: Request for additional Fire and Rescue staffing COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: Chief Burch and I are most appreciative of the Board's authorization to hire the 20 additional fire and rescue personnel. The allocation plan, including the additional staff, was presented to the Board on March 13. At that time, several Board members and citizen representatives from units that were not included in the allocation plan asked that we develop an additional plan to implement Phase 2, and that the proposal be brought back to the Board for approval. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Staff has been meeting since March 13 to develop a plan that incorporated suggestions made by the Board and citizen representatives. We are in the process of coordinating the Phase 2 allocation plan with the various fire and rescue units. We are pleased with their responses so far and will include their suggestions when we bring the final proposed allocation plan for Phase 2 to the Board on March 27, 2001. ~ ~~1 Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson motion to Church _ x Denied () authorize County Administrator to move Johnson _ x Received () forward with advertisement for 15 positions McNamara- x Referred () Minnix _ x To () Nickens _ x Second motion on page 2 ~- ~ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION --------------------------------- VOTE No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens motion that Church _ x _ Denied () source of funding come from implemen- Johnson _ x Received () tation of fee for services and in the interim McNamara x Referred () authorize County Administrator to use the Minnix _ x To () audited year-end surplus Nickens _ x _ cc: File Rick Burch, Chief, Fire & Rescue Diane D. Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer Danial Morris, Director, Finance Joe Sgroi, Director, Human Resources 2 } AGENDA ITEM NO. ~~"~°~ APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~'. M 710~J(~C~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW; ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: d~)n!) ~~ ~ ~~ l,~- ADDRESS: ~'u1~e~so~~~~ /~a~dh~ ~a~9 PHONE: ~~q~l.~ 1.03 AGENDA ITEM NO. APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS ~~ %~ SUBJECT: ~-_- I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AHD ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW. ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: .<< - ADDRESS: ~~ ~.5~, s PHONE: AGENDA ITEM NO. APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE ~ITIZEN COMMENTS suB~ecr: ~~+ -d I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE G[//DEL/A/ES L/STED BELOW.' ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ADDRESS: PHONE: AGENDA ITEM NO. APPEARANCE REQUEST -PUBLIC HEARING -ORDINANCE ~CITI2EN COMMENTS SUBJECT: % ~' I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW.' ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ADDRESS: PHONE: ~~ ?- ~oa.3 l C~ _~~Ci~~;~~~ ~C~~;~~i~}~~ I~~C~~ii~ ~,~~ ~`~~~1~- WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, AND, OF THE CURRENT COUNTY E 9-11 AREA SERVED BY STATION 8 REQUEST THE RETURN OF TWO CAREER FIRE/EMS RESCUE STAFF AT STATION 8 DURING THE 6AM TO 6PM HOURS. THIS IS THE ONLY TIME, AT PRESENT, NOT STAFFED BY VOLUNTEERS; WE FURTHER STATE OUR SUPPORT FOR THE STIPULATION OF A PRIORITY IN ANY FURTHER ACTION (S) TO BE TAKEN BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS , REQUIRING PLACEMENT OF STAFF AT THE BENT MOUNTAIN, MOUNT PLEASANT, AND CATAWBA STATIONS; SUCH A STIPULATION HAS BEEN PROPOSED BY THE VOLUNTEER CHIEFS ASSOCIATION ,AND ADDRESSES THE SAME THREE AREAS OF THE COUNTY LEFT UNDER STAFFED, OR, HAVING LOST STAFF AT THE OCTOBER 24,2000 MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. NAME ADDRESS E911 area Station 8? ;. ~rs is a n~ 4 /afxst'issr~addr+essc~C - ~r tease wtia s~9naf /~4~ ~{~''~~ , ~'~~.~ s~y~ uy~,~. WE THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF ROANOKE CgUN(~'Y, AND, OF 7HE CURRENT COUNTY E 9-11 AREA SERVED BY STATION 8 REQUEST THE RETURN OF TWO CAREER FIREIEMS RES~UE STAFF AT STATION 8 DURING THE 6AM TO 6PM HOURS. THIS IS THEl:C~NLY TIME, AT PRESENT, NOT STAFFED BY VgLUNTEERS; WE FURTHER STATE OUR SUPPORT FOR THE STIPULATIt~fN OF A Pl'iIORITY {N ANY FURTHER ACT1gN {S) TO BETAKEN BY THE BOARd,~~OF SUPER1/1SgaS , REQUIRING PLACEMENT OF STAFF AT THE BENT MOUNI~AIN, MQUNT PLEASANT, AND CATAWBA STATIONS; SUCH A STIPULATION HAS BEEN PROPOSED DY THE VOLjUNTEER CHIEFS ASSOCIATION ,AND ADDRESSES THE SAME THREE AREAS OF THE COUNTY LEFT UNDER STAFFED, OR, HAVING LOST STAFF AT TH11E OCTOBER X4,2400 MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. NAME wnnR~S~ Y~~ ~iV / G~~ J -nP. d~.~ ~ ~o~~ \~\,~' ~3y .~L~A 1 p~ ~-~n 4 ~'~ E911 area Station 87 i C-~ A oft o5 0 /11~: A 2yD~Y ~£s5 rr PETITION PAGE 2 NAME ADDRESS E911 AREA ~~ ~ J ,a,-~ C:d,~,v~,~' Cr~~e y /0 3~ ~ 8f~.~ ~~~ ~~! -- - ~3t ,r f may; ~, z ~c ~ ~ ~'~-s PETITION PAGE 3 NAME ADDRESS E911 AREA Station 8? PETITION PAGE 2 NAME ADDRESS ~ ~~~' E911 AREA (~ L ... 1 .-.... C1 ^l 3 .,~ ~s syy, S ~ r' PETITION PAGE 3 NAME ADDRESS iioia~n~ E911 AREA Station 8? ~ . ,. ~- ~s ~~ u n¢w C~~st t ss u.e~ u~ress~d- • ~r Z'laase cdGU Scq~e~~a~ (~' ~,r , ~i~os~ s~yri 4~9ei~ WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF ROANOKE COUN~fY, AND, OF THE CURRENT COUNTY E 9-11 AREA SERVED BY STATION 8 REQUEST THE RETURN OF TWO CAREER FIRE/EMS RESCUE STAFF AT STATION 8 DURING THE 6AM TO 6PM HOURS. THIS IS THEI:ONLY TIME, AT PRESENT, NOT STAFFED BY VOLUNTEERS; WE FURTHER STATE OUR SUPPORT FOR THE STIPULATION OF A PRIORITY IN ANY FURTHER ACTION (S) TO BE TAKEN BY THE BOARQ~ OF SUPERVISORS , REQUIRING PLACEMENT OF STAFF AT THE BENT MOUN`Ity41N, MOUNT PLEASANT, AND CATAWBA STATIONS; SUCH A STIPULATION HAS BEEN PRQPOSED BY THE VbLUNTEER CHIEFS ASSOCIATION ,AND ADDRESSES THE SAME THREE AREAS OF THE COUNTY LEFT UNDER STAFFED, OR, HAVING LOST STAFF AT TFi~E OCTOBER 24,2000 MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. 1 } ~~N area ic~- ~rC~~~'C~'r1'h r'i0 ~~l~l ~ 3 ,(~nc~ ~rc1. NAME ~r~~/ ~c% ~ ~C-~1/'~ ~.~ ~- ~ cc, _~' .~ ,, 1 ~',.~.,.. ~ ~ _~: ~ ! 1 ~' OL\~< ~~A --- 1.,~.~__ , L ,.._ ~ ,... ADDRESS r Pr.SZ~y, r. (~. Q~'~ I'~'f Q~~~ ~~~ i1 ,~ d ~ ~:\ ~~~s.h ~ f"Yl ~ ~1~113 fl~~~t~~Yt~ ~~.v~_ "l~n~ ~3~ ~ Nc fl ~., d 12c~ ~cr (~ `~ U U!~ ~; - ~~; '~ -.., ~i 7 ~ ri~i,,~ ,: O• 6 ~y~21<. R ~~1.y.U~ ~~'~ r~ox 3 IULt=Y t~vk'4icir ~o77S~C9+~' &'~~k~' ~ Cof'Pt~z /f ~ ~ E911 area Station 8? rr 1 ~,ry s ~S `fie>5 dc~~ Cu~ i B. .i ~ l ~/ t c /~ ~4-~J~~ y~~J ~ ~ 11-~ ~ I?yam .1 ~ J/~,r-.c, ~-- ! ~~~ _~ ,~ /~ /~ ,v ~~ T ~ ~, r~ ~ ~,-S S ~'[ PETITION PAGE 2 NAME ~x~ N~o t., ~c~~ 'C~I:Qi' l , ~.~~~ 2'tirw ~11,'~'1~~t,1~-~ ~ ~~~ 1~ ~ , , ~. i~1 ~~, z ~ ~ ~ ~- ADDRESS ~ --- ~ ~ P~ -~~ S ~- cD ~ ~ ~ ~.2 Cr~~,-. ~ fly ,~~ ~yG~ Gc~~'lle~ ~- La~ t ~ ~: ~ ~ ~c E911 AREA Station 8? ~~s YCS YE s ~icn. . ~, t~ ~ ~ WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, AND, OF THE CURRENT COUNTY E 9-11 AREA SERVED BY STATION 8 REQUEST THE RETURN OF TWO CAREER FIRE/EMS RESCUE STAFF AT STATION 8 DURING THE 6AM TO 6PM HOURS. THIS IS THE ONLY TIME, AT PRESENT, NOT STAFFED BY VOLUNTEERS; WE FURTHER STATE OUR SUPPORT FOR THE STIPULATION OF A PRIORITY IN ANY FURTHER ACTION (S) TO BE TAKEN BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS , REQUIRING PLACEMENT OF STAFF AT THE BENT MOUNTAIN, MOUNT PLEASANT, AND CATAWBA STATIONS; SUCH A STIPULATION HAS BEEN PROPOSED BY THE VOLUNTEER CHIEFS ASSOCIATION ,AND ADDRESSES THE SAME THREE AREAS OF THE COUNTY LEFT UNDER STAFFED, OR, HAVING LOST STAFF AT THE OCTOBER 24,2000 MEETING OF TF~E BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. ~.~.y ~\~~ 1~%~~~.y~ ~`rC~-- NAME ADDRESS E911 area Station 8? _~ i ~. ~ ' \ WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, AND, OF THE CURRENT COUNTY E 9-11 AREA SERVED BY STATION 8 REQUEST THE RETURN OF TWO CAREER FIRE/EMS RESCUE STAFF AT STATION 8 DURING THE 6AM TO 6PM HOURS. THIS IS THE ONLY TIME, AT PRESENT, NOT STAFFED BY VOLUNTEERS; WE FURTHER STATE OUR SUPPORT FOR THE STIPULATION OF A PRIORITY IN ANY FURTHER ACTION (S) TO BE TAKEN BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS , REQUIRING PLACEMENT OF STAFF AT THE BENT MOUNTAIN, MOUNT PLEASANT, AND CATAWBA STATIONS; SUCH A STIPULATION HAS BEEN PROPOSED BY THE VOLUNTEER CHIEFS ASSOCIATION ,AND ADDRESSES THE SAME THREE AREAS OF THE COUNTY LEFT UNDER STAFFED, OR, HAVING LOST STAFF AT THE OCTOBER 24,2000 MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. NAME ADDRESS E911 area Station 8? ~~C~~ /J ~~~ ~~ ~ ~~v ,~ - Ord . rG ~ ~, til/ ~%O ~~~ , A/. E. ~ ~ ~ ~ u~=~.~-itc~ ~ c~~ ~~ ~~ 4 .5 ~ ~ ,~ U1 -~ 4 C c ~~~ ~.-+' ~~ 1 ~~~ Ali 1.~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~- ~/ ~; ~~Gl'~L,:('~::t_ G~-~i fGz, ~'?~~ ~,Pi"jL P'~G;,~ ~t., C."o~"~~ ~~~1/' , ~~ v` `~C 711 -~ ~ ~ ~'ETTTION PAGE 2 NAME ADDRESS E 91:L AREA Station 8? ~~ %~ S r sly y ~L~ ~d ~-`~ ~~ PETTTI~N PAGE 3 NAME .ADDRESS E911 AREA Station ~? ~~ ~. .1~y ~In 1 :yl ~J U , I WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, AND, OF THE CURRENT COUNTY E 9-11 AREA SERVED BY STATION 8 REQUEST THE RETURN OF TWO CAREER FIRE/EMS RESCUE STAFF AT STATION 8 DURING THE 6AM TO 6PM HOURS. THIS IS THE ONLY TIME, AT PRESENT, NOT STAFFED BY VOLUNTEERS; WE FURTHER STATE OUR SUPPORT FOR THE STIPULATION OF A PRIORITY IN ANY FURTHER ACTION (S) TO BE TAKEN BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS , REQUIRING PLACEMENT OF STAFF AT THE BENT MOUNTAIN, MOUNT PLEASANT, AND CATAWBA STATIONS; SUCH A STIPULATION HAS BEEN PROPOSED BY THE VOLUNTEER CHIEFS ASSOCIATION ,AND ADDRESSES THE SAME THREE AREAS OF THE COUNTY LEFT UNDER STAFFED, OR, HAVING LOST STAFF AT THE OCTOBER 24,2000 MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. NAME ADDRESS E911 area Station 8? ~- ~ ~-/ i--i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d ~ ~ (a ~ ~ d ~ ~ .Q U 4~ a--' ~q V O ~ ~ Q O N '~ ~i (!') .~ 4~ 4~ ~ ~ ~cn O ~ O O N ,~ O N ~ V C1~ ~ ca 4- ~ 0 r~ 0 m a a 0 .~ U O 0 0 N N U ~, cd N W nO, W ~ ~ ~ ~ • ,~, (n ~ O ~ ~ •~ ~ ~- ~ ~ J ~ 0 ~ O ~ ~ ~ .~ a= ~ ,_ ~ ~ ~ 4~ ~ ,O ~ _° W L ,k 4J .. ~ ~ > ~ .~ O ~~~ ~~~ ~V ~~ '~~ V 1 ~L ~W) W a--~ O O ~. ~--~ 0 O ~~~ V O a .U ca 4~ C~ .~ V ca O ~~~ O ^~ ~~ ~L W O O U ~' a ~ o ~ ~~ V ° ca Q O .. .~ 0 ~ ° N N U ~~~ ~ M L Q~ T.,~ ~ ~ __ll O `Y O ~ •- O N c~ ~ O ~_ ~ O ~ ~ ~_. N Q ~ ~o ~ Q ~ •- o a~ ~ ~ ° .~ > ~ ~ N o .- L V ~ ~~ ~ 4~ Q ~ a~ ~ ~ - ,~ ~ v, ~ ~ Q O •c t~ •O ~ i `~ ~ . - ~- ~ W ~ H '~ H ~' O ~ •~ ~ N ra ca r~ ~ ~~ ~ a L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~; N ~ .- ~ ~ ~ ~ i V ~ f~ i V L Q c~ m Q ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ j I O 4- L 0 "~ ra N .- V ~~.- a .>_ oC ~•~ I .~ .~ •o .~, O r~ c ,~ •- ~ a o ~ a (n , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~_ ~ ~ ~ ~ V ~ ~ t~ a ~ o ~ ~ •~ ~ • L •- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ H L O Q~ ~ V o (/y L o ~ O ~ cv U ~'~ ~ .,~ ~J r\ N N .,~ N b4 ti N ~ O L O ~ ~ ~ ^ ~ a..> .~ V O •~ I c a ~ O ~ L a, ~ a~ m ~ V ~ 0 ~ .~ ~ V t~ ~ f~ ~ 0 ~ O er ~ r~ ~ V o u" ' m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r~ ~ cn V ~ cn p to > cn > ~ ~ ca L p7 ~- O ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~+ V ~ V ~ a ~1 01 ~ 01 ~ ~ ca ~ O y= ~ 4= ~ a ~ ~ V ~ ~ O ca o ~ ~ ~ ^, W ~ L U ~~ ~ ` ~~ ~^ 4~ O V ~ X V U V ~ .V ~ d ~ A J ~ ~ ~ ~ f~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ^ ~ ~ ~ ~ L 'v 'v ~ ~ ~ ca L .~ ~ ~ (~ ~ (~ ~ fQ ~ W V ~ N ~ ~ Q, ~ Q X Q x ~ L f~ ~ ~ ~ .L ~ L L ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ' O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ d' M ~ ~ i. ~ •- ~ ~ •- a--~ N (n (n • - ~ ~~ ~~ ~ . _ M (~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'~ ~, ~'~ J e'r'r > ~'~ I ~ •,~, ti s~ i+ ~_ a 0 L a C ~L ^_~ a~ v O a C .~ .~ L I~ t H c O ~' .--~ O N O Z .--+ O O O U 0 r--~ C/] ~n d ~~ 0 N ti i .~ a~ a c~ a 0 .~ Cd ~--i C~ r--~ 0 0 N N U C~ 0.~ N s~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C~ V 3 2 2 ~ 2 N ~ ~ N N ~ ~ L y ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ J J J J J J J J J J ~ ~ ~ Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q L L N ~ O O ~ O O ~ O O ~ O O > 0 0 ~/ Q ~ d• N ~ ~' ~ ~ N N N N N ~ N ~' N N N ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ V C ~ ~ ~ ~ L L 0 0 0 0 O O O W ~~ 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 o N N N N N N N V as ~ ~ c v ~ = ~ o o N ~ = c ~ N N ~ Z ~ r ~-- a ~ ~ a a Q a a s a L ~ ~~ ~ ~ 0 Z 0 2 0 = 0 = O 2 O 2 O 2 ~ d ~ ~ N N ~ N N ~ ~ ~ V C W •~ V" ~ N N N N N N N V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r C ~ c ~ ~ ~ 3 C 1° Y ~ ~QQ ~ cn ~ a~ ~ C ~ cpa O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o CJ _ °~ U ~ . 3 ;, ~ • .e ~ o ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ o U ~ ~ ~ c U U ~ m m ~ ~ a~i ~ 3 3 cd cd ~ ~ cd cd b b ~ ~ ~ ~ N N l r-+ «i a a 0 .~ V~ O r.., C/~ .-•r O O N N U c~ `~ O ._ a--~ a--i O N Cn J Q ~t' N 4~ O L ~•~ .~ Q~ .~ ~ ~ .~ O ~ ~ ~ J ~ ~ ~ ._ ~~"~ L .. O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° o ~ O ~ O ~ ~ ~ _~ ~ ~ U L O ~ ~ O ~ L 's= U o°o c~ ~ O ~ ~N ~ > •- ~ - ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o .~ > ~_ o .~ o U > _ ~~i i'i~j ~~ O ~~ A, ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O V ~ Cn .~ J - Q O ~ _ ~ to ._ ._ ~ ~ ~ ~ W J ~ ~ .~ O ~ ~ O ` V ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ '~ a~ O ~ L a U ~'~ .~ ~~ O ~~ . _ a-.~ L ~ ~ m ~ ~ V ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ a ~ (~ • - ~ ~ fQ ~ a. ~ ~ (~ ~ a--~ ~ o J ~ ^ WO Q ~ ~ O ca ~ ~ f~ ~~ca . _ a-.~ ~ ~ (~ ~' ~` U ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ o > ~~ o N O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~'~ ~ O I~ I~ L~ O O I..n O O O O O t.n Ll') rl ~ ~ ^ ~ ~ ~ _ .~ M N ~ p fl- o ~ V '~ 00 O ~ ~ ~ • M ~ i ~ V ~ V ~ . ~ O O . ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ x ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ U) ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ O O ~ ~ ~ V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~~ ' ~ U O Q~ O O U O N p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ _ 1~ (Q ~ ~ (~ .~ (~ ~ ~ Q~ O ~ V ~ ~ V '~ ~ V Z H 1 ~ H 1 H 1 ~.~ ~.~ ~ ~^~ ~.~ 00 a~ a a 0 .,.., U 0 0 0 N <` N U s~ ~"~• ~~ ~W,^ Vl a 0 N N 'd .~ C O V 4~ N ca ~•~ ~ O O • - . - ~J ~ •~ ._ ~ ~~ ~ ~ o ~ o ~~ o~ m ~ ~ o oC ~ 4~ ~ ~ ~ L O O ~ ~- O ~ -~-~ O ._ O ~ ~ ~ .~ 4) a.-~ ~ ~ O O O U U `•i ~~ O • • - ~~ ~ L v o ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ o o ~ ~, U - ~ ~ - o O o ~ ~ ~ o ~ °~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ •O ;~ O ~, ~ O ~L •~ c~ L i _~ i V 4' O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U p ~ O O ~ ~ ~ i V O ~ 4~ ~ O •~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ate.., ~ ~ ~ O •- O ~ > U ~ U 4) w ~~i iii iii O~ a .~ 0 on 0 0 N N U ~~~~~ ~. 0 ~. a--~ • N ~ `jV 0 ~ ~ .. Q~ ~ ~ a..~ 0 ~ ~ O 4~ ~ ~ ~ ;~ ._ ~ C~ ~ 4~ ~ .0 ~ ~ ~- ~ a- ~ .~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ •- ~ .~ O ~~~ ~,~ ~V '~~ '~~ L a--~ O O 4~ a--~ O O L ~~~ 0 0 ~--~ L 0 0 U ~' a ~ ~ ~ ~ a V ~° ~ ~ V ° O ~ i- ~ ~ O ~ ~ Q .V Q ~ _ ~ ~ ~ .O ~ ~ o N N .~' ~~~ ~~~ ~ 1 A-032701-2 ITEM NO . ~"' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE CENTER MEETING DATE AGENDA ITEM: March 27, 2001 ACTION NO. SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION Request For Endorsement Of Transfer Of Administrative Responsibilities For The Housing Choice (Section 8) Voucher Program From Virginia Housing Development Authority To TAP/Blue Ridge Housing Development Corporation. (TAP) COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: This is a complicated issue and I want to be sure that Roanoke County has the ability to review the performance of TAP/Blue Ridge Housing and make changes if necessary. Perhaps we can authorize this for a period of 5 years with the right to renew. We may want to regionalize our Section 8 program or handle it ourselves in the future. BACKGROUND: In 1984, Roanoke County requested the Virginia Housing Development Authority (VHDA) allocate Roanoke County Section 8 Housing Vouchers to serve the needs of low to moderate income (LMI) families. Under this program, Roanoke County LMI families are eligible for a Federal (HUD) rent subsidy based upon their family size and income level. Once qualified, a family may use the voucher to rent market-priced privately owned rental housing in the County. An eligible family chooses their place of residence, and the landlord receives a portion of the fair market rent from the family and a portion of the rent from the Federal government (the voucher). VHDA administers the program at the state level, issues rent checks, and prepares all required HUD administrative reports and plans. 2 ~~ When Roanoke County made the initial request to VHDA in 1984, we proposed, and HUD and VHDA accepted, that local administration of the program would be undertaken by a local housing agency and not Roanoke County. Initially, the program was administered locally by Fralin and Waldron Housing Management Corporation. In 1990, TAP began local administration of the program for VHDA. TAP has administered the program for the past eleven years. As the local administrative agent, TAP enrolls applicants, maintains the waiting list, inspects properties for safety compliance, and intervenes in some landlord tenant disputes. They also prepare required program reports for VHDA. Under TAP's administration, the program in Roanoke County has grown from approximately 38 voucher families to a current total of 88 voucher families. There are an additional 110 qualified Roanoke County families on a waiting list for this program. SUNII~lARY OF INFORMATION: VHDA no longer wishes to be a state-level administrative agent for this program. They have offered to transfer all of their administrative responsibilities to the local provider in each locality where the program is offered. Once transferred, the local provider will work directly with HUD on all administrative and financial aspects of the program. TAP is willing to accept the additional responsibilities so that the program can continue to be operated for the benefit of the Roanoke County families served. Roanoke County originally requested that VHDA offer this program. Because this program is offered at the County's request, VHDA has requested that Roanoke County be offered the opportunity to endorse the administrative transfer of the program to TAP. OPTIONS: 1. Endorse the transfer of all administrative aspects of the Housing Choice (Section 8) Voucher Program From Virginia Housing Development Authority To TAP/Blue Ridge Housing Development Corporation. (TAP) ~~• 3 2. Do not endorse the transfer of administrative responsibilities. VHDA may still transfer responsibilities without the County's endorsement. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Option #l. Respectfully Submitted, Approved, i1 u T( Terrance Harr' gton, AICP Elmer C. Hodg Department of Community Development County Administrator ACTION Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson motion to endorse transfer to TAP/Blue Ridge Housing Development Corporation cc: File Terry Harrington, County Planner Virginia Housing Development Authority TAP/Blue Ridge Housing Development Corporation VOTE No Yes Abs Church _ x _ Johnson _ x McNamara- x Minnix _ x _ Nickens _ x { A-032701-3 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~"~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 27, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: Request to Approve the Consolidation of Starkey, Merriman, and the New South County Park Into One Facility to be Named Starkey Park. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: With impetus from the 1992 bond program, Roanoke County has acquired several new properties and developed new park facilities in South County. These include Starkey Park, the Merriman Soccer complex, the new "South County Park", and the upcoming acquisition of the Guthrie tract. During the development of the new South County Park master plan it became obvious to the citizen planning committee that because of the contiguous boundaries of the above mentioned properties, Roanoke County had an opportunity to consolidate these parks to create an interconnected multipurpose park facility. This facility would not only provide for the youth athletic needs but also would provide opportunities for additional greenways, picnic areas, an additional playground, and open green space which were very important to the committee. The park is also bordered by approximately 3/4 of a mile of Back Creek. If access can be obtained, this opens up the potential for creekside recreation. In 1997 a South County Park master plan was completed and approved, that incorporated all the contiguous tracts in to one regional park facility. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Now that the South County portion is complete and ready to open, the facility needs a name that encompasses all the facilities. After discussions with staff and the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission it was felt that due to the historical importance of the former village of Starkey, that any park name should include "Starkey." Therefore, staff is recommending that the entire park be named Starkey Park. ri w C-~ Cave Spring National Little League has requested that signage be included to identify the respective fields at the different locations within the park areas. This will be incorporated in the signage program for the entire area. While the soccer fields have been named the Merriman Soccer Complex, they could be easily referred to as the Merriman fields at Starkey. The new portion has not yet opened so there is little problem with name recognition. Staff plans to promote this name change through the Recreation Clubs as well as in our youth athletic newsletter, which is being published in mid-March. We will add a sand blasted sign at the entrance to the new park and change the sign at Merriman. We plan a soft opening of the park in February when the North Cross baseball team begins use of those fields and hope to coordinate a grand opening event with Cave Spring American Little League sometime in the spring. FISCAL IMPACT: There will be additional signage but these funds are available in the existing signage and maintenance budgets. ALTERNATIVES: Alternative 1: Consolidate Merriman, Starkey and the new park into one facility named Starkey Park. Alternative 2: Leave the parks separate with three separate names. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative 1, consolidating Merriman, Starkey, and the new park in to one facility named Starkey Park. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, ~~~~~ ~~, Pete Haislip, Director Elmer C. Hodge Parks, Recreation & Tourism County Administrator ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by: H. Odell Minnix to approve Church _ x Denied () consolidation of parks and naming of Johnson _ x Received () Starkey Park McNamara- x _ Referred () Minnix _ x To () Nickens _ x cc: File Pete Haislip, Director, Parks, Recreation & Tourism A-032701-4 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 27, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: Request to appropriate $25,000 as a match to light the large baseball field at the new South County Park. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: This is being brought to the Board at Supervisor McNamara's request. Recommend approval of this request for $25, 000 from the Capital Account to match funds raised by the Little League. We should be able to reimburse the County with other funds that we will receive in the next few months but need to proceed now to take advantage of the construction and playing season. BACKGROUND: The development of the South County Park added two baseball fields and a soccer/football field to the field mix in South County. Currently the Cave Spring American Little League program is one of the few club programs countywide that does not have their own multi-field complex. Their ability to grow and develop a baseball complex has been hindered by the lack of affordable land in the Windsor Hills area and the fact that most of their facilities are on school board property, which restricts their ability to develop fields. With the development of the new park in south county, the south county Recreation Clubs and Roanoke County agreed to allocate the new park to Cave Spring American so they could develop a tournament level complex on County owned property. Roanoke County Parks, Recreation, and Tourism supports this action. It fits in to the long term plan for each county athletic program as well as the County's sports marketing program. In order for this to take place Cave Spring American Little League agreed to give up a lit field at Shell Park, for the unlit field at South County Park. This allowed the Cave Spring Girls Softball Association to create their own tournament level complex, but left Cave Spring American short one lit field. Alit field is important because North Cross School uses the new field in exchange for gym space for our basketball program, reducing the time available to Cave Spring American. It is also anticipated that the J.V. team at the new Hidden Valley High School will use this field. The Cave Spring American Little League Program is asking the County to help light the large field for the coming season. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: E-y The Cave Spring American Little League is strongly committed to developing a first class baseball complex. They have completed a master plan for the park and are looking at a total long-term investment of close to $200,000. They received funds from the 1999- 2000 Capital Improvement Incentive Fund (CIIF) to add fencing and dugouts to the new park, and they plan to submit an additional funding request this year. They have also implemented an ongoing, and to date, very successful fundraising campaign with total cash and pledges of over $70,000, which will be used for scoreboards, batting cages, bleachers, and other improvements. Because some of these funds are dedicated to specific improvements they need an additional $25,000 to match the approximately $35,000 they have received to light the large field this spring. In order to save money, they would like to light the small and large fields at the same time. Lights and other improvements to the new park have been included in the Parks and Recreation C.I.P. request. However, based on the significant financial and community support for this project the Cave Spring American Little League is requesting that this portion of the project be accelerated. FISCAL IMPACT: There are no funds are not currently available in the Parks, Recreation and Tourism budget to match the funds raised by the Cave Spring American Little League. ALTERNATIVES: Alternative 1: Appropriate $25,000 from the Capital Account to match funds raised by the Cave Spring American Little League to light the large field at the new South County Park. Alternative 2: Include $25,000 in the Parks, Recreation, and Tourism departments 2001-02 C.I.P. to match the funds raised by the Cave Spring American Little League to light the large field at the new South County Park. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative 1, that the Board appropriate $25,000 from the Capital Account to match the funds raised by the Cave Spring American Little League to light the large field at the new South County Park. Respectfully submitted, Appr ved by, Pete Haislip, Director Elmer C. Hodge Parks, Recreation and Tourism County Administrator ~/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by: Joseph P. McNamara to Church _ x Denied () approve funding of $25,000 from capital Johnson _ x _ Received () account with capital account being McNamara- x Referred () reimbursed from any settlement with Minnix _ x To () Virginia Gas Pipeline Nickens _ x cc: File Pete Haislip, Director, Parks, Recreation & Tourism Diane D. Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer Danial Morris, Director, Finance A-032701-5 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 27, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: Consideration of the acquisition of additional shares of ownership in the New River Valley Commerce Park COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND Roanoke County has participated in the Virginia's First Regional Industrial Facility Authority since July of 1998. The Authority's mission included crafting a framework for 15+/- local governments throughout the New Century Region to develop a regional industrial park. Roanoke County supported the creation of the New River Valley Commerce Park in Pulaski County by way of a Participation Agreement dated October 14, 1999. The County currently owns 10,000 shares (6.7%) of the Park, representing an annual contribution of $27,500 to the Virginia's First Regional Industrial Facility Authority. According to the Participation Agreement, "annual payments by the participants shall continue until all debt repayment is accomplished and may be reduced as the loans are paid." The total estimated cost of the project was $6,908,500, with two loans outstanding (approx. $2 million each, one for 20 years & the other for 40 years). "After all debt service is retired, the annual contribution shall be reduced to that amount which will pay the annual administrative fee as agreed by the participants." As the property develops and the parcels are sold, it is anticipated that the debt service and administrative fees will be reduced accordingly. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION Originally, there were 12 members participating in the ownership of the Commerce Park. Recently, Wythe County has decided to withdraw from the Authority, which has made available their 9,000 shares for redistribution to the remaining 11 members. According to the provisions in the Participation Agreement, the 9,000 shares must first be offered to the participating jurisdictions in proportion to their initial investment. The remaining shares not purchased in this round will be offered to those jurisdictions that bought additional shares during the first round offering. Finally, any remaining shares will then be offered to the host locality (Pulaski County). To date, approximately 8 communities have agreed to purchase all or a part of the additional shares, with three communities still considering the request. The impact on Roanoke County under this first round offering would be to consider the purchase of 638.30 G. "" ./ additional shares at $1,755 annually. This would increase the County's total participation to 10,638.30 shares, or 7.1 % ownership in the Park. FISCAL IMPACT: An additional cost of $1,755 annually for the increased shares. This would make Roanoke County's total contribution $29,255 per year for 7.1 ownership and continued participation in the New River Valley Commerce Park. The current allocation is funded through the County's Public Private Partnership budget. The proposed increase would also be funded through this budget. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the acquisition of additional shares in the New River Valley Commerce Park. Respectfully Submitted by Approved by: ~~~~ ~~ Jill B. Barr Elmer C. Hodge Assistant Director County Administrator Economic Development ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens to approve Church _ x Denied () acquisition of additional shares Johnson _ x Received () McNamara- x Referred () Minnix _ x To () Nickens _ x cc: File Jill B. Barr, Assistant Director, Economic Development Virginia's First Regional Industrial Facility Authority ' .. ~ F- J J Q Z ~ ~- (p ~p ~!f ~q aD lA ~O{ ~- t~ O l0 •r m m M fr] W N ' N N ' ' Ol ' ~ N ' ~ O C ~OOtOC~uO'~nN NN- N ON ~ F ~ V .- .Q. MtflfH64dlVlNlCACACAiNMCAiflCAiA ao o a°o veo o ~o oeo o ;Eo o ~ o CZ~t;~~~tN~Om~OO1~O'~tNO O m ~~~thC7M1+C~h000G~~C O •- ~- C G ~ d 3 Q ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~CO~O t ~ N tGN ~ . ~ N S ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N " ' ~ ^ tC7C N r r r r ~ m O ~ ~ y N N N N~ O CD O r CV h i A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ' ~ ' ~ ' ,N V I~ ~ O O~ YJ _ N O C ~~ m N N N N ~ N ~ ~ ~ MY-fAfA/Ai9 0969 CAfA1HHl69CAMM! W a ae ;e oe ;E ~ o ~ ~ o ~ o a° ~ o o ;~ chr>mmm~oc0~oo i.or~mO 0 C ~~~CV CV OCCCO~ UGC C CC •-~' C p r r ~ O a i ~ ~ ~ ~~ 0 0~~~ 0 0 0 O O N ~ N CV CD CO O W P O .- N P ~ ~ r r ~ r r V ~ _~+' ~ U ~ ~ y 0 Y ~ ,~Y w ~H ~ ~ ~ ~ .o a 0 o-°im ~ ~ a ~L°_o~o 000 v ~ o e a ~ m ~.o ~ W ~ 0 wzo~a00« mc~t9~o.~ o:~ a~c~czaaO O r W y m ~ ~ ~ i ~ C O ~ ~ i ~ i ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .+ Z ~ V ` ~ fA V! Mf fA d! iR H d! C9 d} tH fH C9 Y-. fA fA to S p O Q ~ ~ ~ Y rr~ ,~ { ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ i i ti ' I d ~ h 1, ~t~ YI ' ~ ~~ ' O C~ m C p i ~ i~ i i ~ ~ i i ~ ~ ~ i~ ~ ~ ~_. ~ W ~ Z ~ V fR ff1 M d9 to CA CA H! IH d! f9 64 CA CA iR CR d3 r" o ~ r. _ ~ t„~-:- ~ o ~ Z err ~;d q~ :~` Ts +, 3 ~ C m C O i~ ~ i i ~ ~~~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ i _C W Z C(~ ~ d W ~ ~ ,fR 69 fA ff! fH d! CR fA CA tH fR CN fA N! 69 f9 tf? ~ lC iii! ~ _, 0 ~ H r .~- CO CO ~- l[1 In tf~ f~ ~ ~h O iC ~.. O O N N O S O O r` O ~ ~ ~. '3 p ('~ CO M M m I~ ' cv I~ ' ' .- ' CON ti ~ G Z C (~ C'7 lh O r ~ ~ r N V =r < vi~~~us~u~u~uau~~~~u3v- ~s _~~ m d a of a o o~ o~ of o o ~ o oe o ~ e G L~~ ~~ ~' N C O CO r- O O ti O ~ N O Q ~ a~ ~ ~~-.-CO C7~f~ Ctp I~CCCC.-~A O r r ~ ~, ` ` 0 r ~ ~ d C • C ~o o ~ ~ o'~ ~ 10 ~ p~~p~?'°~C"pra~'Ut=nG'~ !gyp NM~S w'''"F'.~' ~_~; .~:MT ~~+?°~:i O y p ~ aA :Cp cCA lit ~ CO ~ y'SP c`7 N~ (d N-~ 8 O O IOCI r ~°- In -`. CV ~~:~ .~~r C a~ • W M " a° .~ a 0 o aE U ~~ ~-b AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 27, 2001 RESOLUTION 032701-6 DENYING BID PROTEST OF HEIMANN SYSTEMS, CORP TO AN AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR X-RAY SECURITY EQUIPMENT FOR ROANOKE COUNTY COURTHOUSE WHEREAS, Heimann Systems Corp of Pine Brook, New Jersey has filed a formal protest of an announcement of an award of a contract for X-ray equipment for Roanoke County Courthouse security pursuant to a Request for Proposal (RFP) # CP99-0049; and, WHEREAS, after review of documentation provided by both the protesting company and the successful bidder, Security Defense Systems Corp., and after considering the recommendation of the Roanoke County Purchasing Department; and, WHEREAS, Section 17-129 of the Roanoke County Code requires the Board of Supervisors to issue a final decision, in writing, on any bid protest, stating the reasons for the action taken, within ten (10) days of receipt of such bid protest ;and, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, as follows: 1. That upon a determination that the X-ray scanner equipment offered by Security Defense Systems Corp in their bid response to Roanoke County RFP # CP99- 0049 complies in all material respects with the bid specifications of said RFP, there exists no basis for this bid protest, and accordingly, the bid protest of Heimann Systems Corp. is denied. This decision is final. 2. That this resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after March 27, 2001. 1 On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution denying the bid protest, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Joseph B. Obenshain, Senior Assistant County Attorney Gardner Smith, Director, Purchasing Patricia Chockley, Roanoke County Buyer Wayne Horvath, National Sales Manager, Heimann Systems, Corp. 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~ ~ !° AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 27, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: Consideration of Bid Protest of Heimann Systems Concerning X-Ray Security Equipment for Roanoke County Courthouse COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: On March 21, 2001, Roanoke County's Purchasing Department received a letter of protest from Heimann Systems Corp. of Pine Brook, New Jersey, protesting the award of a contract to Security Defense Systems Corp. for an X-ray scanner for the security system at the Roanoke County Courthouse. This X-ray scanner is the type of equipment which examines bags, briefcases and other items carried by individuals into an airport or courthouse building. The procurement process for the purchase of this scanner involved a Request for Proposal (RFP) with specifications developed with the Roanoke County Sheriffs Office. The apparent basis of the protest by Heimann Systems Corp. is that the equipment offered by the successful bidder is "non-compliant with the majority of these specifications." (See Exhibit "A", attached). After the Purchasing Department received the initial complaint from Heimann Systems, Security Defense Systems Corp. was offered an opportunity to respond which they did by letter of March 21, 2001 (See Exhibit "B" attached). If should be noted that Heimann Systems had previously protested a similar contract award by Saint Louis County, Missouri, which was rejected (See Exhibit "C" attached) After thorough review of the information submitted by other companies, it is the firm opinion of the Purchasing Department that the X-ray scanner offered by Security Defense Systems Corp. does comply in all material respects with the specifications set forth in the county's RFP # CP-0049. Therefore, there is no substantial basis to accept the bid protest by Heimann Systems Corp. Section 17-129 of the Roanoke County Code prescribes that the Board of Supervisors shall issue a written decision stating its reason within ten (10) days. This decision is final unless an action is filed with the Circuit Court of Roanoke County in accordance with Section 17-134 of the County Code. FISCAL IMPACTS: None anticipated STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the bid protest of Heimann Systems Corp. to the award of a contract for an X-Ray scanner be denied. Respectfully submitted, ~h B. Ohlenshain r Assistant County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Vote No Yes Abs Church Johnson McNamara Minnix Nickens 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 27, 2001 RESOLUTION DENYING BID PROTEST OF HEIMANN SYSTEMS, CORP TO AN AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR X-RAY SECURITY EQUIPMENT FOR ROANOKE COUNTY COURTHOUSE WHEREAS, Heimann Systems Corp of Pine Brook, New Jersey has filed a formal protest of an announcement of an award of a contract for X-ray equipment for Roanoke County Courthouse security pursuant to a Request for Proposal (RFP) #CP99-0049; and, WHEREAS, after review of documentation provided by both the protesting company and the successful bidder, Security Defense Systems Corp., and after considering the recommendation of the Roanoke County Purchasing Department; and, WHEREAS, Section 17-129 of the Roanoke County Code requires the Board of Supervisors to issue a final decision, in writing, on any bid protest, stating the reasons for the action taken, within ten (10) days of receipt of such bid protest ;and, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, as follows: That upon a determination that the X-ray scanner equipment offered by Security Defense Systems Corp in their bid response to Roanoke County RFP #CP99-0049 complies in all material respects with the bid specifications of said RFP, there exists no basis for this bid protest, and accordingly, the bid protest of Heimann Systems Corp. is denied. This decision is final. 2. That this resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after March 27, 2001. G: WTTORNEYU BOWGENDA\HeimannBidProtest.Reslun.12001.wpd E%HIBIT A March 20, 2001 Patricia Chockley Buyer P.O. Box 29800 5204 Bernard Drive SW, Suite 300F Roanoke; VA 24018 REF: X-ray security equipment for Roanoke County Courthouse Bid # CP99-0049 Dear Pat: Heimann Systems Corp. 3o Hook Mountain Road Pine Brook, Nl 07058 Phone (973) 83o-zioo Fax (973) 83o-zzoo www.heimannsystems.com After our conversation this morning, along with your letter dated march 19~', 2001, please consider this letter as an official letter of protest on the intent to award of the above- mentioned bid for X-ray equipment. After careful review of the specification provided by the County of Roanoke, we feel strongly that the vendor recommended receiving this award is clearly non-complaint with the majority of these specifications. Please see the attached spreadsheet that will clearly outline the deficiencies present in the systems scheduled for award. The new Heimann Systems Hi-Trax platform represents the latest technology and what we believe to be the most modern and innovative technology in today's marketplace. This combined with Heimann Systems proven track record of reliability i.e.; MTBF rates, demonstrates superiority to our competitors. We continually have these claims reinforced by agencies such as the U.S. Marshals Service and the FAA who recently have evaluated equipment from both manufacturers and continue to purchase the majority of their systems from Heimann. It should be noted, that the Hi-Trax 6040i's ergonomic features and advanced technology is the culmination of two years of research and studies performed on operator interface and imaging technology. Therefore, it's our belief that the hardware and software presented in the 60401 will give the highest possibility of threat detection to Roanoke County. HEIMANN SYSTEMS L= HEIMANN SYSTEMS When a competitive bid is generated, a choice is typically made whether to provide a generic specification or to conduct a more thorough investigation of the available technology and write a more detailed specification based on the findings of the research and the ultimate requirements of the end user, which is to enhance an operators ability to identify guns, knives, explosives and other contraband. In the case of Roanoke County, we felt that the specification was the result of the latter. After speaking with Captain Hart, through our agent, EQUIP it was determined that the 60401 would give Roanoke County the most effective security solution available. It should be noted that, had a more generic specification been included it is certain that we and other manufactures, would have responded with models that would have better allowed us to be more price competitive. However, the investigation of the end user resulted in a specification for a higher level of technology, therefore, that is what was bid the Heimann 60401. It should also be noted that we offered an alternative bid with the Heimann HI-Scan 6040d at $21,000.00. My understanding is that this would than put Heimann Systems 6040d as the lowest responsive bidder if the specification was relaxed. Based on these circumstances we feel strongly that only three options are available to the County. The first, to honor the specifications as written and award to the lowest responsive bidder meeting that specification, Heimann Systems 60401. The second, to cancel the bid and rewrite the specifications with a lowered standard, which would allow all vendors the opportunity to respond. Three if the specification is relaxed, award to Heimann Systems 6040d. We await your direction for further pursuit of this matter and trust that Roanoke County will use this information along with their own history with Heimann Systems to continue to seek the best value in their procurement of X-ray screening equipment. I am available to assist in answering any questions that you might have relative to any of the infromation provided. We continue to remain at your service. Si , ne H ath National Sales Manager Heimann Systems Corp. 973-830-2104 ~` N ~~ m~ <><<> N Z o •~ ~ ~ -a ~ o o ~ c ~ C ~ 'C o Q. Y L - U ~ L N . . -. L N ~ h . -. Q ~ °o a, ~ Qao.o E v " a~ °~ :::> :; (~ ~ a cv ' , . n E ~>':>'• ~ o :>: ~ ° W ° ~ °~ m aEi o ~ E ~~ <`<' Ego E~f° ~ cv E >, E" ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ n ~~ _ ~ ~ 0 • :::»#cs: o cv ° C N O" o Q, C ~ o rn ,~ o C ~C ~ CJ ~ ss:~« ~~3:~:; ;~ ~ o v .E C tII ~~~ W W O a ~! W O %~:~ W o ~ W W W o .' p~ Y »~~` W a~ o~ .:w.:. L w r •° ~ L a~ 's;s d '~'+ d N ~' ''' cQ C w v N d'~ •;::;•:~;: i O C F/i~: cII O L O O O ,C O Q r t~ L C '~' d ~? O - Q ;~, Q1 Q C C~ ~ eC y •` p ~~ v O G1 ~ r y L ~ _ O d p V d O d ': ~:~::•:: .Q •:#t2~': O C. ~ L` N O ~ Y d O ~ C w w R y C O a »; sl _ ~ ~ ~ > c •3 0 ~ o _ ~ o ~ .x a >< 41 < ' s' O ~ O w Rf 41 %%:`• 01 ~+ ~, V N V ~ ~ QI y~~~N~ :~fiV.r ~ 'a ; :. s, <;;<•.s.< ~ Q ~ ~~ A d 01 O ?> <' O L O N y O C O :<ww::: ~ ~ ,~ t0 a ` lC ~ ''>f" ~ d r lrC N w N ._ .C M ~ V ~•''%'~3%' , 7 _ R C X C . .,.... si<<' IQ ~ r y 3 N ~~+ L %:%~ O r ~ +" d C C r O O d V•• O 0 '`' QI i O C C .II i t ii y C 3~ N d 3~ :::: L •:.:: .<;; rr: Rf C O > O : L C ~ O >+ •Q ~~ r O O r N C Y.. > >, - .a C C v ~ ~ c L ~ y ~ l fN{ d' ~' O N O O_ c.~ E '<><"< C v O = O~ L ° ~ <:: L <: < (A _ E o d +_~ E y a~ ~ 1!iii ~ O V O O ?~ii'i.•:: Q~ x G! V~ O r ~yI! ~«+ Cf 0~ O y v ;~: ~ L Q ` ~•. y O O d y t. C p L~ ` G1 O d O L O p O L ::r~i;r: ~C Of r O Os ~ O O O ~ C N J r • ti.. V N C R C1 ~ O. O 0 • • . ` _ V 0 7 N d O- f0 IC L L 0 ..`~1`` N 'a Z cv C r' y V y ~ N ~- O L r ~ .. ` p V o > y 0 0 C <d ~d ~, N c L o : : y 'Q ` O 7 O d.O E E E a + • .. 1C .+ ~ r y- y L-Q 3 o L ~ c y c ~ r y ~ a ca . ~~ <> rte, ,~ m ~ c w ~ eQ '3 ~_ E ~ ,;#,~.. ...., .: ~, O d d y •~*.? xF, E e"'a E v y s' _ d :: 'y C :::::::•j L ~ - ~~ >+ 6G iic ; ~ N O E ` N N { ,': M O ~ y i ~ .Q ~ L L 0 N r y Z < Vl V! C t0 O p ~ t4 ~' y 0 d` N N ~ ~ : ww ~~ ;: 'Riit' ~ E r 7 ~ ~ ._ O C9 J + ~ a Q i 0,, O w. 7 ~' O to ~ ~ Q` N V ,~ C E p R ~ V '~'' N E o Q co ev ~. ~~ '~"'~~` c ° c d ~° ~ o~ °' .5 ~ '~~< X t a ` ~ :: a~ N R 'a "- ~ y :Q Z d ~ ~ in > ~ o w ~ °' ~ ~ ~ ° E +, ~ ~ ,~ c C O ~ O :: o d t- +' V! `° N c r 01 >~ L r Vf C O o ::.~:: c :°_ O] as Vl d '~ r G7 O iv m d E c ~, o ~ .~ V ::~:, 3 •Q L y O d r ~ E = O d V <~ C G1 > •~ 3 'C C :: C fn ~ ~ tD Q1 ~1 .~ d lQ C V V) ~ ,a: ~' O C 3 ~C ~ N d >' L O ~ N ~ +~~• ' O F- O ~ O a .~ lQ LL C. <.:.:.~: i' O d d ~ .~ ~ N N O et E .~ X d y d E 41 ~ -.. 'a •Q :`' O O p '~ .G O. N w C d O r ,C 0 >~ O O r - v- Q 'C r ~ O Z O Z ~ N m f6 ca a ° 0 E3 N~a' o o~ c p0'm~ ~ U o ca L.. R C L ~ ~ N r~+ ~ (a ~ p N O O N ~ C 7 V> O O O TL ~ N ~ =~ N O Y O E ccu o cco mEcc _ fa U N • L ~ O a ~ Y U U C C t6 f4 O y •N U a ca ~ U ~ ~ R U C U O f0 ~ E _ ~ ~ 7+ .~.. ~+ T ~ m ~+ ~ c ~. vp- ~ ~ C ~, a o. ~, EN n. E a Eo o. O E~ n c R o E°-'oL-= a E d •L O E U ~ O U O r U •jA O p U ~ O ~a +N- X C U ~ ~ f O U N o V c ca o c 0 0 c a 0- c ~a fl.~w o ~ U c ~ .. O O •`-' fn C fn N N N E N E N Y N E D O j ~ c N W 4= W O N o N N O o 0 O O 0 0 O U o ca N o U ~- p 0 o ca o- a N o ~ ~ ~- ~~ O N ~ N ~ ~- ~ alL ~ N ~ '-- N C y' N N •~ O y ~' > C ~' N N N R R1 N E ~ ~ ca ~ + ca 'Q ~ R ~ O d 0 = y Y~ N ~ ~- w L O t w _Q . C .OC .~ ` C~ ~ i N ~ R O N C 'Q .O O O O C1 ~ O C O R C N R C~ w O d N O w r`~ R O N O C d 0 R N C L R N~ O ' = F- t °~ w O .c o a ~~ U ~' L m L +r ~ E c~v t' - ~ +r o R" ° C 0 m ea ~ R ~ G O C O ~~~ ~ c4 - C N R Q . . +' w. O v N O N R C w d o E 01 ~~ ~ L O~ ~ C N V N`~ N y L _ +-ww=:: N O G1 ~~'~ °1E~,~' oca Q, mcacmo3 O r° 'Q O ' a+ E R O E R ca ~ r+ d N N_ d y L~ O C L y O N ~ L N v OL ~` C L N R R L O a +.+ N to ~' ,F, O. N` v ~ y y ,p N O S i ~. y Q' - 'II G,i O O R~ ,~ d N E 'C a + V tQ d • _ R ~ E r- E ~, .C E o n ;a L N d Y R' .+ 'Q ~ ~ O Y w ~ m o c 3 Y d c v ~ 7 o Q' d d 3 d L L C N cv >. o ... ~ E O = ~ V N E ~' w a v ~ . w w ~ v C 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ O. ~ N t A 7 y 0 % ca N 'O v .. , y N~ O d O E ,3 «°. ~ O O Q ~ L O ~~ E O V L V ~ 01 ca Y O~ U N O y N C~ aL.+ L L o t o ` . E v NL y C X N C a N C O E to •-+ : ~ ' ` d _ R Q R~ y O w N~ N e d d N O. d O N ca C~ 0 O V d ~ oocnead c N , p `~L~;a~ ~ ~Eocc Lo3 ~ t .1 ood~LO.°~' + d~~a~ a,NEcE ^ ~ooE ... d ,~, o ° .QQRa~w. c ar N N ~ - ~ O R O C O R O O O , ~' ~ ` '~ R R °'~ d Q 01 H ~ ~ c s ~ i ° 0 3 o N ` 'Q c ~ ° N N ~' O N d C a' ~ r ~ • ~ Y ~ ~ a . _ ` ~ c 0 c a o c E rn~ ~ ca .Q t0 L C R ,O ~, R L R O L v ~ O v O v :: O T C 'Q _+ 'Q +-' O C O n. d o v E H K c ~ °~ ` ~ ° ~ ~ ° ,~ ° ° d ~ ~ ` R cca v°, ;_ ~° ° _ ,o m , ~ C p ~: O N i R 0 0 V` "~ ~ N Q7 w O L C C E H ~ N L r r E N O C ~;, O d= p w 7 C . ' 3 0 O . v ~ d = ~ N O N Q ~ C R C w ~ r a Q N= 0 ~~ w • O C R R Q C .O N R O a a m C1 ~ 7 w >. N x ~ L O L R .d ..+ ++ O d O L E R C L y C to E ~ O C~ O ca 7 ~ ++ v ~ 3~ ~ d,~ = d o ~ o ~ ch X O a"- ~ e~Q, N:° o o f E ~ ~ '_° N.cr a m ~ N °' ° w c ~ ~ ° ai ~ ~" m R '~ a c °~' d 3 c °' ~ ~' c Ea a E ,y m L N:cE L c a a~ ~ c ~ ~ E ~ E ~ o.R o 'c ~~ d c ~ L o 0 o c' ~~ 0~'~ ~ ~ R d O ~ .~ e t ~ ~ •~ ~ ~ C O ~ ~ _ 'a w y o C 0 _ t Q a L o F- a O N d L O d N ._ m .. to C a O v ~ y d= c a t ~ a ., a to .. N L ~ m F- .r ~r O O O c Z Z Z g ~ C "= U fQ N C C _ ,+_>• ~ ~ N O C N o •N N a, N ~, _ ? ~ ~~, a` ~ c ~ 3 ~ ` a> U w= ~ ~ .II ~ ~ (~6 N ..r cB y E E N y ;~ '::>:t::> ;:;:> ., ~ E ~ c c m !- ~ ~ , U N ~ ''~'~'~~'':' ~:~r~y:' ' CC : U f6 fp N W ~ L ~ ~ y ~ U O Q N O N O ~ V :,i,S ` L L Z •- w:: > T aEo aim arc oc >~~ Q E °o ~ ' ~ E r .~ E `r m U c - `wi:> ~ Q ,~ '~'~ ~~ ' ~ o -o o tL o c ~ a~ o c m o rn -Q s:~>:~t:>~: o co .:. ~ fC U O O 'N ~ 'D v-. ~ C 'f6 'D 4- N fQ to > yE~fT:i? ::.17w;: O ~ W O ~' ~ •`•~~%~: O :`•:~t'ks~ G1 L ?`i ~~ ~ ~ C ~ G1 ~ O ° ;:5?~: G1 o fC - ~ ' ° c ~ dQ , .:: E a rn fl. .L O a i2 7 ~ ~ t4 t 0 y t ~ . •: ~i:'3 V7 E vl ~ ~ C y ~ C y d 'R O t y ~ < ~ ~ °' ~ :~ °' '~ c ~<':<': ,ten r ~ E "; , . ~ <>: r- o ~ ~ E c c ~ c O ' O ~ ' : ~ ~o c E d ~ E ~ O ~~~s> v, o . . . y w ~ ~ o ~ ~ E c ~ °' ~ a i ~ ~; o .. L C 0 ' O ' R1 + N X Z ::~: i Q O 0 O Q O 0 ~:~ O V O ' ~ R *:: E G1 i+ L i ~ fl- L d L c d o. y L ~ _ :' ~'' C L ~ ~ a~ w- N III N C C >+ ;: G) t C N t C O O O ~ r R ? ~ d V c~ ~ c V ~ d c a v :.:> > ~ ~ Q. ~ ` ~ E v > ~ a ~ ~° ~ E O L ° ~ o~ > fQ C .` ~ G N L V Q. _ ~ ~ ' i i d ~ ~ C 'a ~ - O C ~ d ~C +'' .C v- ~ ++ L v0- N c0 ~( d a+ N G1 +0.. O ++ ~' y d >' d d b L y G1 ~ L Vl y ':~~i: .G ~p 01 ~~~ Vl ~ o O O c~ .. ~ O O ~ r m c L L C ~ ~ e ' m y ~' m - > ~ o E O o ~ a~ ~ o . as 'C o , ~' cv °.:° .a :.' p c L 7 C O C Q~ Q. C L V V) O m ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ °: ~ ~ ' ~ ° c O E "~~ '` 'L o ~ o Q . ... .. . . ' w ,.. to a si. ,. „ J v N ~ ti Exhibit B ~pcurlity t>fef~rw~p Sry~t~rx•~~ C+ta~-p. 160 Park Avenue Nutley, New Jersey x7110-0?_43 March Z i , 2001 County of ftoactolce Pureltttssiitg Department P.O. k3ox 21800 5204 Bermard Drive, S.W. Suite 300E Roanoke, VA. 2401$ Attn.. Ms. Pat Chockley bear Ms. Cltackley, In response to quastio~ns raised in The Protest of Awardal Proposal Number CP-0049, please allow- me to provide the following response. 1. The Series 515 crated weight is 1,200 pounds. System weight is 9t10 pounds, approximately. 2. Stainless Steel Conveyor covexs were not included in the specification, Rapiscan Series 500 Scanners provide for a baked e~tanteled conveyor cover fznish. 3. The Series 515 Scanrtet provides for image resolution greater than 40 SWG and 38 AWG, as specified. 4. The Series S 1 S includes a 14-bit image conversion rate. 5. 7'he Series 515 automatically applies the high penetration to the dense areas of each item through the "Crystal Clear T""' Computer Automated Image Uptimization functiart. This furtction can be "progrunmed" permanently or through operator selection. 6. Alt operational features o£ the Sezi.es 515 Seanner are accessible in the zeal time operations mode, when operating in the real-time mode. 7. The Series S15 Scanner includes doom Magnifcativn fra;m 2X through 16X. 8. -i'he Series 515 Scanner provides a zoom location via direct key selection associatiay~ to zoomed area. Tel: 973.235-0606 Internet: vwvw.securitydetense.com Fax: X73-235-Q132 ~+ (~ Gds 9. The Series 515 Scanner provides panning zoom access #hroug~ associated kcylward area selection. 10. The Series S] 5 pro~~ides for Programming 1?uatctiotas via pn-Screen Menu Selection grad by Trackball Selection, if desired. l 1.7'hE Series S15 provides for rala;~aihed, screened images to utilize the entire xx~o~tit.c>r space available. 12. The Series 515 utilizes the Microsoft WindowsTM Opcxatirag System. 'T'his was an exception idet~,tif'ied in the rcturxted Bid Response, SIaS asserts tine Windows'"' Operating System is at least an equal. 13. The Series 515 Scarancr control panel is custorxtizable to speciaic customer requests. 14. 'I'lae specified MTl3P rates are internally docunae~xted rates which caiuxot reflect rates associated with tlae specified FII,Scan 60401, since this model has only been ifs productin~~ for less 11raK two years. However, as an ISO-9002 registerod cwnpany, Rapiscan general MT f3l' ,rates are 2 to 4 years for tb~e sysiem axad 7-10 years far floe X-ray generator. It iiaay be o1 interest to note, St. Louis County Go~vernrnent purchased Rapiscan Series 5'l S Scan uers, in aianost art idLnticat bid situation. Tkte Il:einaann I~'1'-Sedn bUAOi was spccifed, exactly as it was in Roanoke County. iJpon Award to SDS, Heimann Systems protested. SDS responded to St. Louis County {copy included) aceordiiigly. St. I.,ouis County denied Heimaran's Protest and SDS installed two {2) Series 515 Scamiers as per bid specifications in Noverttbet• of20f)o. A contact at St. Louis County is: Mr, Bob Ilorrasey @ 3IA-E15-5333 or Mr. l~rardC Beira, Puxelxasing @ 31 Q-615-70t5~. 1 have other references w3iona have conducted side by side evaluations with the Rapiscan Scanxaers vers~is the Heimatut $eanraers. Please do nvt hesitate to contact race if this additional information is of interest. Thanks f'or the opportunity to be of continued support and pease do not hesitate to contact z2te fbr additional information. ,~ MP.n. ~1-~i `Niii~ ~1 M Exhibit C +.~'rr_curlt~ [3elFense''~t,~e~tew•ns C~xr~r. 100 F'arkAvenue Nutley, N9tN Jersey 07110-0243 September l8, 20t)C) Saint Louis County Acirztiriistratioll 41 Sauth Central Avettuc S~i.rrt f .ante, MO. f 31 f15 Attn. Mr. Frank Beira -~ birector of l?rocarerzzea7t Dear 1vlr, Berea, Please find the following xespar:se to The l?rotest received relevant to IIrQ #2000-0$03 for the supply of Security X-ray Scarutes-s. 1 have addressed ONI.X the points Heimarxrt has asserted STaS as not ist compliance with which are iueluded in The Coutaty's specification (copy attached). I du not address tlic axpazaded version of the spECiftcdtiohs which Heirnantt has includsd in their Protest. PlaysicAl Specifications: The Rapiscai~ Series 5I5 with required 79 inch long conveyor weighs not more tl;dtt 900 pounds. Ittnttging: The Rapiscazt Series S IS images gxeatar tl-~an ~!Q gauge SVtrCi or 38 .AWG wire. Image Processizig Conversion: The proposed Rapisca». Series S00 Scazxr~e.r istcludes xt least a i4-bit analog to digztal conversion rate. Features: The Rapisc2n Series 500 Scaztners all itaclude the trademarked lltnctian "Crystal Cleur"~': This proprietary feature is enabled by the Wit~r~wsT"c Based. Computer Operatiztg Systetn and pzo~vicles for ",A.ttto~oatic Image pptimizatian" which not only ate#omatically identifies and penetrates the dense azeas, beat leases all other image information displayccl; ~ well. Rea(-tune Operation: The specification states "all fEatures must ba accQSSible to the operator without h:r~zng to stop the belt." The Rapiscaa~ Series S 1S r~~cets this requirement fully. however, when operating the systEm in this configuration, the aztalysis tints allocated to the operatox is extretzxsly sb.ort aztd this cot~~guratiatl is txot recorttYttended. mom Position. lr,.ucator ~lo~: The specification states "identif es which a.re,a ofi thc~ bag tl:c operator has selected for zoorn i'uaction". 'Cho Series S IS Scanitcr utilizes 1 si~T~plc anal dizect lcay-coordu~ated zoorn Iocfltor, as specifsed. Tel: 973-235-0606 Internet: www.securityde'enas.com Fax: 973-235-0132 r, 3 "' tom' ~_. Pautiiug Zoom ~'ad: The R.apiscan Series SOU Scanners accor,~p}ish this funeiiota tl~rc~ugl~ the use of the l~ey,caordiuated zaont locator. The trackba;l is not lrtilizCd for zoom function. !I~rogranumablc Function >i~eys; Prograttuning is accessed via the included c~r~~screc;n tnenu selection.. CastantizAHle Co-ttrol Pauei; The specification requires the erzd-user tc~ estahlislt buttai7 key fiinetian. Tllis crun be configured to customer zvquirenrtez~ts. 1 pie) trot understand Heimartn's position relalzve to this having dtrect impact on. "zoar,ted images", 1~urther, the specificatiou nrankes n.o rneratiost of this r~quiretnent. Optizoant: The sp~:cific:tiion recluires the zoomed image to aatomatical}y utilize thr; entire available tnotvtor space. The Rapiscan Series SUO scanneas utili:~e the entire available ~nno,nitor sriaae izt the roonx futction. Certifications: This point is identified as an "exception" in Si~S's t7rigina; f3id Subtniss:on. I~icizna?ztt Systems )aas only rt~anufactured fire Hl-Scsu; G040i Computer Based Systetxt for appraxirnately two years. kieinxanrt has utilized the Linux Operating System during dtis period. Heimanrt's "doct,trzierttecl'' MTBF Rates are trtisla~3rling and clo not represent the specified F3rand Name /Model suice it is impossible to do so far a product mattut'actured for a period ofless ti»:e t{curt the slates! A!'1'B~'.fintcrs. General.Feabu~es: This po.iztt was identified as an "exception" ira SDS's oricitiat Bid Submission. All Rapiscan Series S00 Scanners :ttilize the lldicrosa5ft Wirtdows'~'~ Operating System and this system is offered as an "equal". k~eimanza's statement regarding "mission critical tasks" and ttte'k)S%" market share of Linux is completely unsubstantiated and wiEl not be address:;d further. I maintain that Security befcnse System's offering of the Rapiscln Series 51 S ; j2f) fiilly meets the published speciiicatious in form, function, application grad performance, Accordintrly, Y respcctFully request ~w~1rd be maintaixted to the mast competitive, responsive bidder, Security l-)efense Systems. Mali 11-~1 ai;i, ~ ~~~ rii " .+~•' r .. SPECIFICA71rJN FAR X-RAY 5,,~, RITY SC~N~„~'.,~,TEM (7F1~ FOLLQWING !S A MINIMUM R~QUtR!"MI"NT) _ COM?LY GXC~PTIpf,! f?HYSIGgL~CaNFIGUFtATI~NS.:,'L*.,3r~'r.4.4~1~~~r"`•"~,; r -s-~-•~~,jer. ?-, ---.r.,.~...,.....;;.....~,~,~.._ ~rw~rwrwr~.~~'~~ .ww. 'f'unnel size: 24.4" Wido x 16.5" Nigh ... .. ~,~r ri '~' ~"'" Ovaral) dlmvnsions: Not greater than 7'S" Long x 33.5" Wide _`~~" _~-~' Weight: Nat morn than S00 pounds ~~, _" ~"'~ f'Gwer Requirement: 1113 V~1C ~~-`- iaenetration: ~30rnm of steel ,.,~ - - - ' i' ': ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ :~,"~"'" ^~. ~''.__.`~~,~~;~..;~ Resolution: Greats than 40x~au a SWG or 3B~e AWG _~ ~'-~ L7'r~Cltai Vldeo Mernq~~1280 x 1024 2~ ~~"'_ ~"r` ~~ """~" 22VIS ble rey Contrast~CevaTs ~ """""' ~,~.?`/ - ~ _4~96~C, 'rey caves tared ""~"~ Imago ProcessinglCanversian: 14-bit Anelo~ to D git~acanve~ cn rata ~ ~~~ _ ~~ .....,.....~ .~....., .._.. _ ~m-~--M- ,... ~I't~1'11 V7ll u7 ~•, ::c `~e"~~~., .~,j:'~7.ati'.i~v~~, ;~1i ... _. rr~~~~. ,.._. .y %.'~. Generator. Design must be H+rrmeticalfy sealed oil-bath equipped with ~.... ~~~ Intemel bellows expansion module with no pi) breathing tube cr tank. 140__ kV operetion2l ewer `~~_ rie system must automatical y identr y ense areas an app y t a rgh feature to oni the dense area of the ba In~in~t'-'` a siri~pp ng cape l ty" t~ia uh,l must rncarpora e~ e a ~ - y strrp `~~"` layers of density In an infinite mannr3c as apposed to a step method, bual~nnargyA1=tv~A"~frgan~rJ,'nor~an cTP`ras`e`n~,on s ow~r.g -~-.~-__.__ _.._.~_._.. Qr ag_ niC=,,A,,_ra~nge, Ivor ante=Blue, MixedtiGrcen) _.~,,•~''~ t~4al-time QperatiAr, At`l. eatures miisE~ accessi ,d o"'~ie'o'pera o`f`~ withw_out having to stop the belt TM~/'~ zoom Position Locator 18ox {Idenilties whlcl? area o l e ag t e opera~a'r has selected for zoom function) Panning Zoom ad to controTCh~ xoorn ea use, the use o a mouse ar trackball is unacce ~ab!e fievre o~ last 5-~ ~~trls SC-~ F~wi! ni ~ rova~a:nn o ~ ~._~.. ~~ j/07y'11~R~rK r~rogrsmmable Function Keys-lacat~ ~n he con ro pane . ust ai~ow off- ~ '~ simple repragrsmrning through drop down menr_r without the assistance of ractory~ersanal. _ "~uslrmiza le ontru one . F3 ~n rot pane s e e ow t e en user to ~~ '~ ~~~ establish button function. _ p +zoom -- ~~ fr-ay oma rCa .y rnagni a screene image a r.i~s ~. / "~~~ lha en!ire available monitor space. /' G~RTIFICATIONS ...., ._ - ''_".""~_~""". Uacumented 7 %: years h1Tt3F on generator ~' _ """"~~ ~i Dacum4ntad 4 Ya years MTBF qn the entire unit !, Internationally certlfled ISO 9007 quality standard must be ma+ntained ~~ ~ ~~^~" Mby the manufacturer '.'",~.."_ °_------ ......r~,~~,_ -•-•- -moo h3CfV~KAIr .. . . - ---. _.-_------.-....~.~....,,. peratinc~ System ;;.~' Software tJpgradeabre Advance Oatians. The following aption3 must be ,~+• j " avaiiable; t=AA ApprovQd Threat linage Projection +v+r _g~ ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~...- I AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 27, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: Requests for Public Hearing and First Reading for Rezoning Ordinances; Consent Agenda COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: The first reading on these ordinances is accomplished by adoption of these ordinances in the manner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions, rather approval satisfies the procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public hearing and second reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public hearing on these ordinances is scheduled for April 24, 2001 The titles of these ordinances are as follows: 1) The petition of Go-Mart, Inc. to obtain a Special Use Permit to operate a convenience store on 1.612 acres located at 3752 Challenger Road, Hollins Magisterial District. MAPS ARE ATTACHED; MORE DETAILED INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE IN THE CLERK'S OFFICE. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: (1) That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of these rezoning ordinances for the purpose of scheduling the second reading and public hearing for April 24, 2001. i • ~ 2 That this section of the a enda be and hereb is, a roved and concurred in () 9 ~ Y PP as to each item separately set forth as Item 1, and that the Clerk is authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action. Respectfully submitted, ~~~1~c~- Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action fro Yes Abs Approved () Motion by Church Denied () Johnson Received () McNamara Referred Minnix to Nickens r• 4N i County of Roanoke Community De~~elopment Planning ~ Zoning 5204 Bernard Drive P o Bax z9sao Roanoke, VA ?4018-0798 Fnr .Starr TT.SP nniv pace received: I 2 J 23~oi Rec`i~:o:' by: J M Appiicssioc fee:.#~, ~ I `t PC.'~-+: dare: o y ~ SuP- PD 1 I 3 J Placs:ds issued: 5Q5 c_° y,J•Zy~01 Cssc Nurrbe: 11 - ti' 2 06 1 (540) 772-2068 ~'AX (540) 7 ~2-2108 r.:., ,.,..:...,.. _:.. ~ ~ ' ~:;,. - '' 'S ~ ~ : V CA r ~ 1 ~ 1" .~iLL ~PPi le~ (check all th.zt apply} Check titi-pe of application fi ~ ~ Rezonia? ~-'Speoiai Usc: ~ Variance Z*ne!address w/zip GO-Mart, Inc. phone. (540) 983-9409 licant5 r A . gp c/o C. Cooper Youell, IV Gentry Locke Rakes & Moore Fix No.(540) 983-==69 10 Franklin Road, SE Roanoke, VA 24011 phone; (540) 353-=212 Owner s nar.~e!address w zip , WITTCO, Inc. P.O. Box 19042 Fax No. (540) 772-649 Roanoke, VA 24019 Prope:-:;r Location Magisterial Disu:ct: Vinton 3752 Challenger Avenue Roanoke Countv Cotz4'nuniry Plan•ung ~e3: Bor_sack Tax ~Iap No.: (E.'sistin? Zoning: C2 050.05-01 26 Storage lot fc= vehicles, SIZe OI t)crCe:(S): AC.es: 11612 I Existing Land Use: trailers . and =then eauinment ,~ •,: Va SPECK F/5c=PER3~fIT f.LPp~.Ze~N2'S(Iv'S)„ - , ZVGA 'fiEZO'Y . , r. - ._ ~ ~ Propcs~d Zonrg: I Gas station and convenience store Propc:sed La_:a Use: Dces cl parcel tr;eet t?:e r;in:m~t:u lot area, width, and frontage re~:ire:~ents of the :ems esteo' ds._::' ~C'es ~ No ~ LF NO; :~ '~ A1~.L~~iCE I5 REQL"IItED FIRST. _ ~ ~ N= - Does the oa-cel meet the n:inurum e:iteria for the requested Use Type? Yes A VARIAI~iCE TS REQUiRID FIRST lI' NO , If reronin,g req~:est, arz conditions being prase=ed wish this requesf Yes 0 Ne C ~ .~ -, • ` n , ~; ;`~: 4 ~1~L~, y CE' 4PPLFC4:VT'S ' , , .._ ., ::~ ~ I Vari~.ce of Section(s) oz the Roar:o?ce County Zonis Ordir::.nce ir. e: __- ter F~ Is tree ant;iicauon corrplzt~? P1e:se cnc-.:'.c is cac:osed. APPLZ~:A'TZON ti~7I.L NOT BL ACCE : ~D I.F A'~Y GF 'IAFSF- TTF_1~15 ARE 1~1T55L~iG OR INC:C)lYiPL.ETE. RLS V ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ x l i Cons?canon `~ 8 112" x 11" sonar: plan x l ~ ?:Fpiicaec_ :_e x I A2Flicar'on x Metes and bounds description P:or~a, i' apgIiCS.cle Iuaiticaion ~ a Water and se~Ne: application I I Adicinir.~ ; ~pe;:•; ownc:y .,,~ I hereby ce:::~ that I am either the owre: Of the prope:ry or the own:: s agent or Contract purcha=e: a_~' ar.. a:_ng vr~h the k:owlrg: a.. cotue: t of the owrc:. i~ - ~ ~ ,, °*,_ .," r i . ,_.~ -~~ ~_ ~ ~ ~ Contract Purchaser C. Cooper Youell; IV„~'C~urrsel for Go-Mart, Inc. i Checklist for Go-Mart. Inc. -Special Use Permit Application •~ O~ G;~p~' Pr; , ~'~_ ~~~`gLIST _ ~~ ;. -_ -_ A concentplan of the proposed proiect must be submitted with the application. Tne concept plan shall~araphicaily depict the land use change, development or variance tl,.at it io be considered. rurther, the plan shall address ar_v potential land use or desien issues arising from the reouest. In such cases involving rezonings, the apniican*. may prose: conaitions to limit the future use and development of ine property and by so doing, cored any denciencies that may not be manageable by County pernZitting regulation . The ooncept plan snouid not be conr~~sed with the site ?oian or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building petznit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensure oonlpiiance with State and County development regulations and spay require changes to the initai concept plan. L;niess iinliting conditions are proffered and accented in a rezonin_c or im~nosed on a SpeC.ai L15e perrxut Or Var'ianCe, t<rie ConCeDt plan play be altered to the extent permttted oy the zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with ali rezoning, spec.ai use permit and variance aDpiications. T1le elan should be prepared by a professional site planner. Tne level of detail tray vary, depending on the nature of the request. The County Planning Division stall may exempt some of the items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the following are considered minimum; ALL APPLICA?V :i X a. Applicant name and name of development X b. Date, scale and north arrow (See Plat of Survey) X c. Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions X d. Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties X e. Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. X f. T"ne zoning and land use of all adjacent properties Concept C1-A X .gll property lines and easements X h. All buildings, eristing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights X i. Locators, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways witrtin or adiacent to the development X i. Dimensions and locations or" all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces .4ddiiion¢I infortrcation required for RE~ONING AND SPEC~9L USE PBRIvLrT .APPLIC.41~,r1S X k. ~xisring utilities (water, sewer, storm drains] and connections a the siie X 1. Any driveways, entrances/e;~its, esrb openings and crossovers x tn. TOTJOgraDily map in a suitable scale and contour intervals X n. Approzinlate street grades .and site distances at intersections X o. Locations of all adjacent pre hydrants X p. Any proffered conaitions at the site and how they are addressed X q. if project is to be phased, please show phase schedule I certiry that all items required in free checklist above are complete. ;t ~~ °: ~ ~ s ~ ~ ; ~ -, ~ ! E~ ~ ' p ~ { r,~~~':.-r._ i ,'~ , ,.t,_ I ^.J L.: -LV^Y .~ ii. 6 ~... -~y =~,. - 9` ~ 5 Signature of appiicank ! Date G-I ~. ~ ~i Explanation and Justification of Request for Special Use Permit Go-Mart, Inc. ("Go-Mart") is the contract purchaser of that certain triangular shaped parcel of land located at 3752 Challenger Avenue, Roanoke County, Virginia, designated as Tax Map No. 050.05-01-26 (the "Property"), on which Go-Mart intends to construct and operate a gas station convenience store, as more particularly shown on the concept plan attached to the special use application (the "Project"). Go-Mart has been in the business of selling petroleum and petroleum products since 1914, and currently owns and operates approximately 90 gas station/convenience stores. The Property is currently being used by Wittco, Inc. (the "Owner") as a personal storage lot for trailers, vehicles, and other miscellaneous equipment. The Property is not presently being used for any commercial endeavors. Given the condition of the improvements which currently exist, the Property provides no substantial benefit to the County or its residents. The Property is currently zoned C-2, General Commercial District. Pursuant to the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance (the "Zoning Ordinance"), a gas station is a permitted use in such a district. Accordingly, Go-Mart, the Owner, or any other party could construct a gas station on the Property without any further action by the Board of Supervisors. However, because Go-Mart also desires to operate an accompanying convenience store on the Property, the Zoning Ordinance requires that it obtain a special use permit. These improvements will greatly enhance the appearance of the Property and add significant value and be of substantial benefit to the County and its residents. The Property is located in the County on the north side of U.S. Route 460 near its border with the Roanoke City. Under the 1998 Roanoke County Community Plan (the "Community Plan"), the property running along the north side of U.S. Route 460, has been designated as Transition. The Community Plan provides that areas designated as Transition should be developed in a controlled manner in order to avoid unappealing forms of commercial strip development and the resultant traffic congestion. The Community Plan further recommends that development in Transition areas should favor planned development nodes over strip development. However, there is already significant development on both sides of U.S. Route 460, and the Property is an isolated parcel zoned C-2, General Commercial District. In addition, the Project satisfies and accomplishes many of the recommended guidelines set forth in the Community Plan as evidenced below. Due to the topography of the Property, the rear portion which abuts two residential .lots is approximately 25 feet higher in elevation that the remainder of the Property. Further, mature evergreen trees buffer the Property from the surrounding properties. Hence, the adjacent properties and surrounding neighborhoods are adequately buffered from the Project. The Project has been designed to include a deacceleration lane off U.S. Route 460 to reduce any traffic congestion which might otherwise occur. The entrances leading to and from the Property have likewise been designed to afford the public a safe means of ingress and egress to the Property. (W:\transact\10998\8\00760849.DOC Ver:2} The Project has been designed so as to be esthetically pleasing and to minimize noise ,~"" j and visual impact on the surrounding area. The exterior of the building, the pumps, and the canopy will be predominately soft colors (light yellow and beige). Similarly, all lighting will be directed downward and away from adjacent properties. In addition to satisfying and promoting many of the guidelines found in the Community Plan as noted above, the Project also furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance. The Project will provide additional jobs to the residents and the change in use will generate additional tax revenues benefiting the County as a whole. Residents living in the surrounding neighborhoods and the Bonsack Community Planning Area will be afforded another place to conveniently purchase gas and basic household items, and an unsightly and underutilized parcel of land will be replaced with an attractive, well maintained facility. The Project will have little to no impact on the County utilities or on the roads, traffic, schools, parks, recreation, fire and rescue. It is important to note that in September of 1998, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors approved a request to rezone a parcel of property located at the intersection of U.S. Route 460 and Trial Drive (approximately 100 west yards of the Property) from C-1, Office District, to C-2, General Commercial District, to allow for the construction and operation of a dry cleaning business. Because the location of the dry cleaning business is level with adjacent properties and is situated on the corner leading into a residential neighborhood, the dry cleaning business has more of an impact on the surrounding neighborhood than will this Project. Because the Project furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance and conforms with the general guidelines found in the Community Plan, Go-Mart respectfully requests that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors approve is special use request to allow for the construction of the Project. ~~ t'~ ~ ~i ~ ~; B {,. ~ vr~ ~ti. u `Lu~~%~ i Y~ ~,.: Counsel for Go-Mart, Inc. G. Michael Pace, Jr. C. Cooper Youell, IV Gentry Locke Rakes & Moore 10 Franklin Road, SE Roanoke, VA 24011 Phone: 540-983-9300 {W:\transact\10998\8\00760849.DOC Ver:2} ,~~ ~. ,,,, t. ~\ --- +` . -- ~_ ,. ,E ~~~~ ~ s ~ :!~` ,9e~~ ~,~ I y`" ` ~ ,- O ,off.' .. ~ ~. `Z,. `;. ~~ .,... \. ~- ~ ,bP 1--- Ir ,~ ~ z ~,. • 1- ~, l ~~ `~. .. Z ~i ' ~\ `~o,~ x O . r ~ ; ~ ~. ASP .. ti~ ~ A \ SEE NOTE ~ ~~ RA~MEH7 ~.. FAD-. ~ ~ ~\A ~ ~ ~3 THIS SH \ O t ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~~ LL J ; 9EE NOTE ~-. A m / " .,~~ ~~ Prto Nz3i ci-Aaoo .., 1 7HI5 SN ~~ \ ~ I d ,.~_ 1 ~ // ~ ~\ Vy~ N ~ ~r (n ry '~ _~~ ~~ 1 ~ .. ^ ` ~~~ w e~ip ~~ ~ ~ I 1~ 9o e~ ` I .~ / ~ ..- ~ `~..~~ w - ~; ~ ~ cn 3 TNISOSH ` r~~` ~ 17 fsPASES I ~ ~ RHEIG ~ ~ I ~\ `~ ` ~ ~ '- I ~ 7 ~ Q ' ~ SEE N Tr ' f ~ ~'f'~~`\~ , ~, W ~oar~ _~Trns Sties { :~o~s ~~4 ~~„ qti, Z ~ V '4 "\ ~ ~ -' 03 ~. a ~~o~ ; ~ . A " f- 1 ..'m.'_ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ Q 'f~. . _._ ... . I fROU F I . , 1 .e ...., .. _ GANORE[E i \~1\ c 's ~.~ cRS + 30. YEiAENf-~,• ,• • -RA4EFIENT`., ~~ ~ ~ \t~ G °u -~-. ' f•......~.. 1 X033,6 \ ~ nk1. . k.. .~.r ', . '_ 1 HERS (Trr1 ~~eNe,~ ariowr sEE b t ~ ~ ~ _. ...... o3J ~ ----'- ro33 STORM VMLER. '~ `~-.,rc~ ~ - .. - ~" 4 sPACes J` nsNrAli " ~ / MANAGEMENT FACILITY .. ~. so Pno~.:-: ..' I_ ~ aAVEUert-~J slcn aortoY n. iow.a irt^ '' ~ V ... ~~ ~ .r ,. .. ~~. ._~ _,.--.+...~-~ -b,. .. ~~ . ~ CONC YON'- .. _..-.... °' --_ -. - 1030 -, t03U -_ q A. APPRO% LOLAiION U/L ~ _ -1036-- _ •r~~~ C LI:FR ~~ ~ - ICZ9.n6E ~--. o .... ..., ... .. ~- -- ~~i 03C.2AG ~~G30 `1. i0]0.93E ~l2lll..~- \~y ia3~.oSE ~}p,gOr ~.io3o-a6c .. ~ o~n~~i ... U.S. ROUTE 480 W.B.L ~ Pte. scNr asr~Ntt - iN omE~ a saa CHNIENGER AVENUE 'o v ~. f~ g ~~ NOTES THIS SHEET: 1. BUILDING HEIGHT: 1 STORY, SQUARE FOOTAGE: 2520 S.F., U.S. ROUTE 480 FINISHED FLOOR EL.: 1036.25, DIMENSIONS: 36' X 70'. ~ 2• CANOPY HEIGHT: 20 FEET 3• TIE FINISH CONTOURS BACK INTO EXISTING CONTOURS AT A SLOPE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN 1:1. GRAPHIC SCALE 60' 30' 0 60' 120' 1 ' = 60' EB.L FIFTY YEARS A NEW STORE FOR GOMART. INC ON US ROUTE 460 ONCEPT PLAN FOR SPECIAL USE PERT PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 2/23/01 70025 C2-A F-~ z 0 ~ x Q z z 0 U O Q N U W W ~ x s uH roP ~o]aez Qiz' iNO ~oz J.oe W 1 ` Z J '~ RI = ~ ~ U i i p N xti f . ~, G Q ~o-~b ~ II_ ~ e" ' I ~ '~ ~ °o I I r ~ __ ~ II~ _ Ef .;: ._. ~ .. ~ ' ' uH i(`.!' tOZF 9 12' INU' 101{ _ -~ - ~ 2]I -~10J2 W~ OROP A _._.... ,. ~ tl2J1Ct IOa /T`9J .e __.. ,. ~ ., tlTJ~C ~. ~0../2 9T 2 . . A - Y ,. .. ~ .., ... i ~ _ ,. ,. . _ .,. _. ,. J ~ ... --Y _, .: .. .. - ' ......, ~. , .. ....... _... .... ... ......_. ' - ... .~---^.- !'i"MG Olfi n.: .. ... ~ 5' N~' X026 i o PR LOCniION AP C i.____ .. .~.~. fO:AY---~-EZ^ t i 1 J.X~'~"_"~APPAQ' bZAi ~ "(NV-T(~2B 90 ' _ 50 ITS IhV 1 0 fit ._. _ __ ___... -.. r _._. _ ....:_._,..~. 0_ _ ~ _.. 0/ -_ _._ _. _ _ _ ._ . ~ __ ~ ~ --~.- T MN _,..1'w'f _... _. nPPROY LOCAPON lOJO.>;r _ \1030.ZJE 29 '\ 102980 ' 3 r \1 I 02C>9E \1pZB.~BE ` i02J.B0E \102],]3[ ROUTE 480 U S W.B.L ~„ l .~,~,tl = CHALLENGER AVENUE . . , I ' ~ _ f ^ I 0 0 f ~ 2 "'b00 L~. GRAPHIC SCALE 60' 30' 0 60' 120' 1 "= 60' FIFTY YEARS A NEW STORE FOR GOMART, INC ON US ROUTE 460 ONCEPT PLAN FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT PROPOSEQ DEVELOPMENT 2/23/01 70025 C2-B ROANOKE COUNTY Applicants name: Go-Mart, Inc. DEPARTMENT OF Type of application: Special Use COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tax Map No. 50.05-1-26 ~ ~JOTES: 1. T!-IE BOUNDARY SURVEY SHOWN /5 BASED ON A CURRENT FIELD SURVEY. ~.•--~ 2. NO TITLE REPORT WA5 PROVIDED TO THE LAND SURVEYOR. 3. TH/6 PROPERTY /5 NOT WlTH/N THE L/Ml TS OF THE 100 - YF~1 R FLOOD BOUNDARY A5 SHOWN ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NUMBEP. 5116100028D, EFFECTIVE OC1: 15, 1993. 4. THE CURRENT OWNER OF THIS PARCEL lS WITTGO, INC., AS RECORDED IN D.B. 1253 PG 1583 IN THE CLERK'S OFFICE FOR THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA. ~ q59 V QG• 6 12 ~ 00• ~ f °` L ~ ---- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~o \ \ MANGY J. CAWLEY 17 ~o \ ~yi \ ~ D.B. 6B 7 PG. 67 IRON PIN TAX #050.05 - 07 - 26 A o2 e !~ o ~ ~ ~ ~2 FOUND ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ CITY OF ROA NOKE ~ ~ c ~ ~ CORPORATE LIMITS , ~' ~ -a RALPH W. ~ ~-. Z ELEANOR B. FOSTER ~ ~o D.B. 641 PG. s # T 360 AX 050.05 - 612 AC ~ 1 o O 1 - 27 CITY OF RDANOKE . . o. D.B. 1483 PG. 814 , ~ TAX # 050.05 - O 1 - 26 ~ _ M.B. 1 PG. 1532 ~ _ - -- ~ \ ~~ ~ ~ ° CITY TAX #71601 13 ~ ~ ~ ~ _ #3752 °~ ~°~ 0 LF ` RALPH W. d ELEANOR 8 F05TER ~ ~ ~0 . ~0 1 -STORY ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ D.B. 641 PG. 360 TAX #050.05 -O 1 - 25 ~ 0 WOOD ~ BUILDING-~ m FENCE CONC l1~fON 8/LLBOARD ~ ~ ~, , " LT FOUND ~ 5.4' i'11.8', POLE _ _ / 414.64' TO P. 1. OF_TRAIL DRIVE = _ _ _ -- RoANOKE ~ 533 25'20"W 366.63' IRON 13.36' CONC CURB PlN u.5. ~eour~ 460 FOUND cHALL~NG~k' r~l VL~NU~ 162' R/W LYNCHBURG -- ~F, PL 1 ti ~F~~le ~~ r of SuRVEr ~~~ , i1~ n ~j~ SHOWING ~ ~ (~~^ 1.612 ACRE PARGEL R.N.McDEARMON,JR. TO 8E ACQUIRED No. 1803 Br l~ 2-1'~-`010. VINTON Mfi6/,STERI.~L DISTRICT ROANOKE COUNTY, VlR6/NIA SCALE.• 1 '~=100' HSMM COMM. NO. 70025 14 FEB 2001 HAYES, SFt1Y, MfITTERN ~ MfiTTERN, INC. ARCHITECTS -ENGINEERS -PLANNERS 1315 FP.ANKLlN ROAD, 5. W. RDANOKE, VIRGINIA r~~r~~: 1. TI-!E BOUNDARY SURVEY SHOWN l5 8~15ED ON A CUR,2ENT FIELD 5URVEY. ~»~-~ 2. NO 7/TLE REPORT WAS PROVIDED TD THE LAND SURVEYOR. 3. THIS PROPERTY lS NOT WITHIN THE LlMlTS OF THE 100 -YEAR FLOOD BOUNDARY A5 SHOWN ON l=l_OOD LN9UR~INCE RATE Mf1P NUMBER 5116100028D, EFFEC>-lVF_ OC1: 15, 1993. 4. THE CURRENT OWNER OF THIS PARCEL lS WlT7-CO, INC., X15 RECORDED IN D.B. 1253 Pv. 1563 IN TLlE CLERKS OFFIGE FOR THE CIRCUIT COURT" OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA. 9~~g ~G• ~6 12 ~ I Q~• ~ I ~~~ 1 ~ ~ \ C \ I ~O ~' ~~ ~ ~ CLYDE M. ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ NANCY J. CAWLEY o ~~ ~ ~ ~ IRON D.B. 687 PG 67 PIN IAX #050, 05 - O 1 - 28 A o e _ ~ J "e~~ ~U ~ ~~L FOUND , ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ I CITY OF ROANOKE ' --~ ~ ~ ~ CORPORATE LIMITS , ,- ' ~~ '4 ~ ~ i ~ ~O Sz ~~ RALPH W. ~ s Z ELEANOR 8. F05TER ~ ° D. 8, 64 / PG. 380 ~ s`3 TAX #050.05 - '~ ~ 2 ~C ~ O 1 - 27 _ CITY OF ROANOKE . . o -- _~ f D. 8. 7 4B3 PG. 814 ~ TAX # 050.05 - O 1 - 26 ~ f ~ - ~ M B. 1 PG. 1532 ' ~ , " s7~ l_ ~ - `~" ~G ` CITY TAX # 71601 13 _" ~ .~ ~p , G,P~ \' -. ° ~ ~ 6 RALPH W. ~` UO #3 752 ~ ~~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~L MANOR 8. FOSTER ~~ ~ ~ ' ~ 7 -STORY ~ ~ ~`~ D.B. 641 PG. 360 / ~ TAX #050.05 - 01 - 2.5 METAL ~O' ~ WOOD BUILDING-~ ~ ~ FENCE CONC MON o? ~ ' {} L_ T BTL.LBOARD-~ 5 4` E 8' i POL 1 1 ~ 414.64 TO /', 1. OF TRAIL DRIVE - --~ _ _ FOUND . _ ,~ , - _ _ _ _ -' ROANOKE ~ ~- 533°25'20 "W 388.63 `~-~ IRON 13.36 ` CONC CURB PlN FOUND ~7/~ q ~+ ~Hf'I LL.~NG,~' c. ~ V~NU,~ 162 ` R/W L.YNCHBURG --- ---- --- -------- '4.~~sti, -- ~ ~~ PL i ri pF,~` ~ , J ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER L3 ° M AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 27, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: First reading of ordinance amending Chapter 15. Parks and Recreation of the Roanoke County Code by amending Section 15- 8. prohibiting the flying of any aircraft, including motorized and non-motorized remote control planes, helicopters, and gliders in public parks without a Special Use Permit. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: %~~,~,~! ~ ;~,~,rrt~ ~~'~ 1 ~t ~ / ' ,iT~B ,c,~ Q/GLo ~•nct,~ ,/lr U/ /~GB~' ~~~ ~'~ i~ BACKGROUND: Recently we have had numerous complaints concerning the rocket launching, and flying of remote control planes, helicopters, and other small aircraft in County parks. The existing park ordinance under Sec. 15-8 .11 clearly prohibits the firing of missiles, rockets, firecrackers, and fireworks on County property without a permit from the Director of Parks and Recreation. This ordinance was designed to protect patrons using the parks, while at the same time allowing for the managed use of fireworks, missiles etc., with a special use permit. The staff and police have been able to address the issue of rockets and missiles in the parks, but the ordinance does not address the flying of remote control planes or gliders etc. Currently, nothing prohibits a citizen from flying these types of aircraft on county properties, some of which by the nature of their size, location, and use are totally inappropriate for this activity. Staff feels, and the County Attorney concurs, that due to the inherent danger in flying these crafts, the county has the responsibility to manage their use. Consequently, we are recommending that the park ordinance be amended to prohibit the flying of motorized and non-motorized remote control planes and gliders without a special use permit. This will allow the Parks and Recreation Department the opportunity to manage this activity in the best interests of all park patrons. ~_i SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: There is a small group of citizens who indicate they have been flying in Green Hill Park for several years and have expressed concerns about a flight prohibition. We have communicated to several users that it is not our intention to prohibit flying, but rather to manage this activity through our offices to ensure the citizens and the county are protected. However staff feels it will be difficult to allow flying in any park on a regular and open-ended basis. Our goal is to find another location that can accommodate the special needs of this activity. Staff will be meeting with the users to discuss the potential of creating some type of flying club and to help establish the policies and procedures to allow this activity on public properties. However, until that occurs we are asking the Board of Supervisors to approve that attached ordinance prohibiting the flying of any aircraft, including motorized or non-motorized remote control planes, helicopters, and gliders in public parks without a permit. FISCAL IMPACT: None known at this time. ALTERNATIVES: Alternative 1. Leave the ordinance as is and allow citizens to fly motorized and non- motorized remote control aircraft. Alternative 2. Approve the attached ordinance prohibiting the flying of any aircraft including motorized and non-motorized remote control planes, helicopters, and gliders without a special use permit. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative 2, adoption of the attached ordinance following second reading on April 10, 2001. Respectfully submitted, Pete Haislip, Director Parks, Recreation and Tourism Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Approved by, ~~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator -------------------------------------------------- ACTION Motion by: VOTE No Yes Abs Church Johnson McNamara _ _ _ Minnix _ _ _ Nickens i s ~1. a ,,,~. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 27, 2001 ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 15. PARKS AND RECREATION OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 15-8. PROHIBITED USES OF PARKS TO PROHIBIT THE FLYING OF ANY AIRCRAFT, INCLUDING MOTORIZED AND NON-MOTORIZED REMOTE CONTROL PLANES, HELICOPTERS, AND GLIDERS IN PUBLIC PARKS WITHOUT A SPECIAL USE PERMIT BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Chapter 15. Parks and Recreation of the Roanoke County Code be amended by the addition of the following subsection (13) to Section 15-8. Prohibited uses of parks, to read and provided as follows: Sec. 15-8. Prohibited uses of parks. No person in a park shall: **** (13) Fly any aircraft, including motorized and non-motorized remote control planes, helicopters, and gliders in any park without a permit from the director or his designee. 2. That this ordinance shall become effective from and after its adoption. U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\CODE\aircraft.parks.ord.wpd F ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 27, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: First Reading of an Ordinance to Approve the Purchase and Financing of the Salem Bank and Trust Building COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: On March 13, 2001, the Board authorized the County staff to proceed with the purchase and financing of the Salem Bank & Trust Building. The County will purchase the building for $2,400,000 from East Main Properties, L.L.C. The financing will be done as a lease/purchase through the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County (IDA). The entire building will be owned by the County, leased to the IDA for a period not to exceed 25 years, and leased back to the County. The County currently leases three of the five floors of the building for Social Services, so the financing will be 60% non-taxable and 40% taxable. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Staff retained Hayes, Seay, Mattern and Mattern to review and evaluate the building. Based upon this evaluation, staff recommends replacing the existing fire alarm devices with a completely new fire detection and alarm system consisting of a central control panel and building-wide alarm system with indicating bells and visual alarms. The purchase of the building, the fire alarm and the closing costs will total $2,650,000. We received the most favorable bid from SunTrust bank. This was 6.32% for the taxable bonds and 5.39% for the non-taxable bonds. The debt service will be covered from the net revenues of the building. Attached is the first reading of an ordinance to authorize the purchase of the building and approve the financing through the IDA. The second reading of this ordinance will ~ ~..r be held on April 10, 2001. The IDA will consider the financing at their meeting on April 4, 2001. FISCAL IMPACT: The building will be purchased through alease/purchase with the IDA. The debt service will be paid from the net revenues of the building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adopting the attached ordinance. The second reading of the ordinance will be on April 10, 2001. Respectfully Submitted by Diane D. Hyatt Chief Financial Officer Approved by: C~ i Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE No. Yes Abs Approved () Motion by: Church Denied () Johnson Received () McNama Referred () Minnix To () Nickens cc: File ~`" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 27, 2001 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF 0.68 ACRES OF REAL ESTATE (TAX MAP PARCEL NUMBERS 106-13- 6, -2 AND -1) FOR COUNTY OFFICE FACILITIES AND REQUESTING THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY TO ISSUE LEASE REVENUE BONDS TO FINANCE THE ACQUISITION OF OFFICE FACILITIES FOR THE COUNTY WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "County") has determined that it is necessary and advisable to undertake the acquisition, renovation, and equipping of certain real estate identified as the "Salem Bank & Trust Building", a portion of which shall be used by the County's department of social services (the "Project"). WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the County proposes to provide for the issuance of lease revenue bonds through the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia (the "Authority") to finance the Project. WHEREAS, the County will lease the Project to the Authority pursuant to a lease ("Prime Lease") and the lease revenue bonds will be payable solely from revenues derived by the Authority from a Lease from the Authority to the County ("Lease") pursuant to which the Authority will lease the Project back to the County; and WHEREAS, the lease revenue bonds will be issued pursuant to the following documents: (i) Prime Lease; (ii) Lease; (iii) Deed of Trust from the Authority to the individual trustees named therein, as trustees; (iv) Assignment of Rents and Leases between the Authority and the purchaser of the Bonds ("Bond Purchaser"). All of the documents listed above are referred to in this Ordinance as the "Basic Documents." BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA: 1. Acquisition of Project. The acquisition of 0.68 acres of real estate and improvements thereon in the City of Salem, Virginia, located at 220 East Main Street (Tax Map Parcel Numbers 106-13-6, 106-13-2 and 106-13-1) for the purchase price of $2,400,000 from East Main Properties, L.L.C. is hereby authorized and approved. The Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator, or either of them, is authorized and directed to accept a deed, in form and substance acceptable to the County Attorney, for such real estate. 2. Issuance of Bonds. The Board requests the Authority to issue its lease revenue bonds or bond (the "Bonds") in the maximum principal amount of $2,650,000 to be paid from revenues derived from payments made by the County pursuant to the Lease. '"~ 3. Authorization of Basic Documents. The execution and delivery of and performance by the County of its obligations under the Basic Documents to which it is a party are authorized. The Basic Documents and the Bond shall be in such form and contain such provisions as the County Administrator and the Chairman of the Board, or either of them, shall approve, such approval to be evidenced conclusively by the execution and delivery of the Lease, provided that the aggregate principal components payable under the Lease shall not exceed $2,650,000. 4. Execution of Documents. The Chairman of the Board and the County Administrator, or either of them, are authorized to execute on behalf of the County the Basic Documents to which the County is a party, and, if required, to affix or to cause to be affixed the seal of the County to the Basic Documents and to attest such seal. Such Officers or their designees are authorized to execute and deliver on behalf of the County such instruments, documents or certificates, and to do and perform such things and acts, as they shall deem necessary or appropriate to carry out the transactions authorized by this Ordinance or contemplated by the Basic Documents; and all of the foregoing, previously done or performed by such officers or agents of the County, are in all respects approved, ratified and confirmed. 5. Acceptance of Proposal. The County Administrator is authorized and directed to accept the proposal for the purchase of the Bonds which the County Administrator determines to be in the best interest of the County. 6. Nature of Obli atg ions. Nothing in this Ordinance, the Bonds or the Basic Documents shall constitute a debt of the County and the Authority shall not be obligated to make any payments under the Bonds or the Basic Documents except from payments made by or on behalf of the County under the Lease. The County's obligations to make payments pursuant to the Lease shall be subject to and dependent upon annual appropriations being made from time to time by the Board for such purpose. Nothing in this Ordinance, the Bonds or the Basic Documents shall constitute a pledge of the full faith and credit of the County beyond the constitutionally permitted annual appropriations. 7. Official Intent. The Board of Supervisors adopts this declaration of official intent under Treasury Regulations Section 1.150-2. 8. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect immediately. The undersigned Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, certifies that the foregoing constitutes a true, complete and correct copy of the Ordinance adopted upon second reading at a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, held on April 10, 2001. Clerk, Board of Supervisors, County of Roanoke, Virginia \\FIN\44882.1 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 27, 2001 SUBJECT: First Reading of Ordinance Authorizing a Special Sewer Service Area/Reimbursement Agreement for the Hanging Rock Commercial District COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Recommend approval of this First Reading for a reimbursement agreement. Please note that this will serve the commercial district only. It does position us to extend sewer services to the Laurel Woods and neighboring area at a later date if that becomes necessary. Hanging Rock is a most important area to the County. It is the gateway to the Catawba area and a major I-81 access point. We want to take steps to make development in this area very nice. BACKGROUND: The Hanging Rock Commercial District has been plagued with marginal septic systems for years. Because of poor soil, the area will not meet today's standard for new septic systems. This has been a major impediment to new development in the area. Although public water is presently available to the area, public sewer is more than 2,500 feet away at the Roanoke County Public Service Center. Although the County has received numerous inquiries in the past for public sewer, existing businesses have not chosen to financially support extension of public sewer to the area. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: A new convenience store is being proposed for the area by Sheetz Convenience Stores on property owned by Everett J. Miles, Sr. This new development desires public sewer and is willing to fund the initial cost of the sewer extension. The developers have expressed a desire to recover a portion of their cost as other commercial properties connect to this sewer line. Commercial property in the immediate area is very limited; therefore, the developers could not recover their investment through normal connection fees. They have requested that a special service area (see attached map) be established for the Hanging Rock Commercial District so that each property would pay their fair share at the time of connection. These fees would be collected by Roanoke County and reimbursed to the developer in accordance with the reimbursement agreement. ~3 In addition Roanoke County will participate in upgrading the sewer line from 8 inches to 12 inches diameter. This will provide adequate capacity for future extensions along Route 311 towards Masons Cove and to the Laurel Woods subdivision. This participation would be in the amount of $30,000 and would be funded from the Public/Private Partnership account. FISCAL IMPACT: The short-term fiscal impact to Roanoke County will be limited to the $30,000 participation through the Public/Private Partnership. The long-term impact should be very positive to Roanoke County. Having public sewer available to the area will allow for development/redevelopment of the area, thereby, generating increased revenues for the County. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve a special sewer service area, with special connection fees, approve a reimbursement agreement to allow these fees to be refunded to the developer of the sewer extension and to allow Roanoke County to participate in upgrading the sewer line in the amount of $30,000. The $30,000 participation would be funded from the Public/Private Partnership account. SUBMITTED BY: Gary Robertson, P.E. Utility Director APPROVED: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION Approved () Motion by: Denied () Church Received () Johnson Referred McNamara to Minnix Nickens VOTE No Yes Abs G-3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 27, 2001 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CREATION OF A LOCAL PUBLIC WORKS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, HANGING ROCK COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF SEWER FACILITIES THEREIN, IMPOSING AND ALLOCATING CERTAIN FEES OR ASSESSMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF PROPERTY LOCATED THEREIN, AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WHEREAS, Ordinance 112288-7 authorizes the financing of local public works improvements and the imposition of special assessments upon abutting property owners upon the adoption of an appropriate ordinance by the Board of Supervisors; and WHEREAS, Sections 15.2-2243, 15.2-2400 and 15.2-2404, et seq. authorize the County to create and establish a general sewer improvement program for a designated area of the County having related and common sewer conditions, to install certain public works improvements, and to impose fees, charges and assessments for said improvements; and WHEREAS, the extension of the public sewer system and the creation of a special utility service district will alleviate public health and safety problems and promote economic development; and WHEREAS, the Board finds that the assessments imposed by this ordinance are not in excess of the peculiar benefits resulting from U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\UTILITY\Hanging.Rock.Com.Dist\hanging.rock.sewer.wpd 1 "" ' the improvements to the property owners within this district; and WHEREAS, the Board hereby establishes the "Hanging Rock Commercial District"; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this Ordinance was held on March 27, 2001, and the second reading and public hearing was held April 10, 2001; and BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the authority of Ordinance 112288-7, the Board authorizes and approves a local public works improvement project, namely, public sewer extensions for the Hanging Rock Commercial District area. That pursuant to the authority of Section 15.2-2243, the Board establishes a general sewer improvement program for this area. The total construction cost of this public sewer project is estimated to be $183,755.00, to be assessed against the properties within the project service district as shown on the attached Exhibit A. That there is hereby appropriated for this project the sum of $30,000.00 from the Public-Private Partnership Account, which is the amount assessed or apportioned to the County for this project. 2. That the "Hanging Rock Commercial District" is shown and designated on the attached plat entitled "Hanging Rock Commercial District" prepared by the Roanoke County Utility Department, dated U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\UTILITY\Hanging.Rock.Com.Dist\hanging.rock.sewer.wpd 2 3/27/01, (Exhibit B). The Utility Department may construct. or may contract with one or more private parties to construct in and adjacent to the Project Service District sewer lines and appurtenant facilities as shown in the map of this area, and shall acquire easements for these lines and facilities. 3. That there is hereby assessed or apportioned to each property owner within the Project Service District a share of the cost of construction of the sewer facilities as shown in Exhibit A. This is in addition to the connection fees and off-site facility fees that are imposed by the County. 4. That the owner, subdivider or developer of property located within the Project Service District shall, before or at the time of connection to the public sewer lines and facilities, or issuance of a building permit for the construction of any building or structure to be located on his or her property which is to be the subject of development or subdivision, pay or provide for the payment of a share of the cost of construction of the sewer facilities, as shown in Exhibit A. This is in addition to the connection fees and off-site facility fees that are imposed by the County. 5. That the owner, subdivider or developer of property located within the Project Service District shall not be allowed to make installment payments under X18-168 (e) of the County Code for U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\UTILITY\Hanging.Rock.Com.Dist\hanging.rock.sewer.wpd 3 G-3 his or her share of the cost of construction of the sewer facilities. 6. In any case where a payment by the owner, subdivider or developer is required prior to construction of the sewer and water facilities, the amount paid by the owner, subdivider or developer shall be held in an interest bearing account for the benefit of the owner, subdivider or developer until expended, or, in lieu of such payment, the Board of Supervisors may provide for the posting of a personal, corporate or property bond, cash escrow, letter of credit or other method of performance guarantee satisfactory to it conditioned on payment at commencement of such construction. 7. Any owner, subdivider or developer of property located within the project service district who pays a share of the costs of construction of the sewer and water facilities after completion of construction by the Utility Department shall pay such share of the cost of construction of said facilities to the County. 8. That the County Administrator or his designee is hereby authorized to execute a reimbursement agreement with Everett J. Miles, or his assigns, a developer within the Project Service District, which will construct and install the sewer lines and appurtenant facilities. This reimbursement agreement is authorized by the provisions of § 18-168(d)(4) of the Roanoke County Code, and it shall be in effect for a period of ten years. The Developer is U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\UTILITY\Hanging.Rock.Com.Dist\hanging.rock.sewer.wpd 4 G'3 authorized to receive the special construction costs up to $153,755.00. 9. That an abstract of this ordinance shall be recorded among the land records of the County with the Clerk of the Circuit Court, showing the ownership and location of the property to be affected by these improvements and the amount allocated or assessed against each landowner. This assessment shall be a lien on the land. 10. That the payment by owner, subdivider or developer of property in the Project Service District shall be reimbursed to Everett J. Miles or his assigns in accordance with the Reimbursement Agreement. 11. That the County Administrator is authorized to take such actions and execute such documents as may be necessary to accomplish the purposes of this transaction, all upon form approved by the County Attorney. 12. That this ordinance shall be effective from and after the date of its adoption. U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\UTILITY\Hanging.Rock.Com.Dist\hanging.rock.sewer.wpd 5 HANGING ROCK -SEWER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS ~„ SHEETZ SEWER LINE EXTENSION SEWER CONNECTION FEE PER ACRE _ Off-Site Facility Fee = PROPERTIES SE Tax Parcel 36.01-02-02 36.01-02-03 36.01-02-04 36.10-01-17 36.10-01-19 'RVED BY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS Property Owner HOWARD R. & LYDIA L. MILES EVERETT J. MILES, SR. BILLY G. &EVERETT J. MILES, SR RAYMOND D. HINCHEE SUZANNE P. THORNHILL CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE 12-inch Sewer Line Manholes Road Crossings Service Connections Contingency (10%) $9,225.00 $1,500.00 One-Half Total Acreage Off-Site Total Acreage Fee Basis Fee Fee 3.58 $33,026 $750.00 $33,776 1.86 $17,159 $750.00 $17,909 3.25 $29,981 $750.00 $30,731 2.70 $24,908 $750.00 $25,658 5.22 $48,155 $750.00 48 905 16.6 $156,977 Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost 2,800 $46 $ 127,400 9 $2,000 $ 18,000 1 $15,000 $ 15,000 5 $500 $ 2,500 $ 17,105 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST = $ 180,005 1/2 OFF-SITE FEE _ $ 3,750 ROANOKE CO. PARTICIPATION $ (30,000) TOTAL PROJECT COSTS = $ 153,755 AVERAGE COST PER ACRE _ $9,257 ~- S _ _ Drive ~~~F QP~G~ ~~ 1 -56 ~ • \ ._ l _ _ Z ~ MZ ~ ~ \ - .~ ~ •\ '\. . \ ,\ .\ ~ - '\ -~ 12W ~_ 36.10-01-14~ .~ \, 12w Rt 4 9 ~• \ l ~ 1 ~. \ i _ /. / . ~ /• / / 2~ / TAX PARCEL / /~ / 36.10-01 /' .• / / i • / / / ~. ~~ i- _1, i TAX PARCEL J 36.10-01-19 /~ / ~% ~ti/ , ~o _- - ~e ~ ~\ \~. ,~_. TAX PARCEL \ \ '°-°' 36.10-01-19 \ \ \ sQ~'' o'~% ~~~ . ~~ - ~ - _ _ ~~ _ ~ / 4W ~ 4W / 4 {ti ~~ ~re HANGING ROCK SE~PER RoArv°~ ~~ ~. ~ o~ ~ L EXTENSION PROJECT PLAN SHEEP CHECKED BY: ~ Z A ~ GTAWBA l1AGISIERNL DISIPoCT flOAtWKE COUNTY, VI2GINA ~ 2 801N0)Q COUNTY UTIId'PY DEPABTIDIIiT SCALE: 1'.300' J 1 ~ 1~ I688iB8D~U~ HOAR GTE: 2T MARCH 2OOi 183a SHEET No. ~ DF ~ \ \ •\ \ ; `~ - ~ ~ \ \ ,~ \ \ • \ ~ ~ ~\ ~- \ ~~ . ~ ~ `\ ~ ~ \ P ~ ~.. 0~'OSED 12-INCH SANITARY SEWER ;EGIONAL FIRE & RESCU ` ~ ~~ \ ~ ' \ TRAINING CENTER ~ •. ') \ \ ~ ~ f (: \ ~. \ • ' ~ 0 • . 1 \ \ - ~ ~o~ . ` \' \ \ n \ ~\ \ ` v' \ ~ \ ` \ 7' ~ \ I ~ KESSLER MILL SERVICE CENR ` ~ \ ~~ F' ~ 9 9 36.03 \ 36.03 03 130 D ~a.s 385 D=4.3 S8 9 ~ 36.03 ~ SS D=6.9 8$ 380 \ o ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER --L ~`~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 27, 2001 SUBJECT: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1. LEAGUE OF OLDER AMERICANS ADVISORY COUNCIL The one year term of Steven L. Harrah will expire on March 31, 2001. 2. ROANOKE VALLEY GREENWAY COMMISSION The three-year terms of Richard Kelly and Charles Witt will expire April 8, 2001. 3. SOCIAL SERVICES ADVISORY BOARD The unexpired four-year term of Raymond Denny, representing the Windsor Hills Magisterial District. Dr. Betty McCrary, Director of Social Services has received notification from Mr. Denny that he has resigned effective January 17, 2001. The term will expire August 1, 2004. SUBMITTED BY: `7'Yl.~s..t,,,c.~_ ~. Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator -------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE No. Yes Abs Approved () Motion by: Church Denied () Johnson _ _ Received () McNamara- _ Referred () Minnix _ _ _ To () Nickens 1 _-~' .~ " AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 27, 2001 RESOLUTION 032701-7 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM J -CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for March 27, 2001, designated as Item J -Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 5, inclusive, as follows: Request from Schools to accept and appropriate $2,000 grant to cover expenses for 2000-2001 regional superintendents and judges meeting. 2. Request from Schools to accept and appropriate $20,000 grant from Carillon Community Health Fund to the School Nurse Program. 3. Donation of New Pump Station Lot #1 in connection with the Read Mountain Water System from F & W Community Development Corporation. 4. Authorization to Donate surplus vehicles to Explore Park. 5. Donation of two sanitary sewer easements on Lots 12 and 13 and Lots 14 and 15, Section 18, Woodbridge in the Catawba Magisterial District from Waldrop Development Corporation. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the Consent Resolution, and carried 1 by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: .~ . ~-t~.L-2~a.,.~.. Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Danial Morris, Director, Finance Dr. Linda Weber, School Superintendent Brenda Chastain, Clerk, School Board Lavern H. Davis, Supervisor of Health Services Vickie L. Huffman, Senior Assistant County Attorney Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development John D. Willey, Property Manager 2 A-032701-7.a ACTION # ITEM NUMBER~.,..~ MEETING DATE: March 27, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: Grant for the 2000-2001 Meeting of the Region VI Superintendents and Judges COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS : G~~'''~~ BACKGROUND: The Special Education and Student Services Department of the Department of Education awards a grant each year to the school division in charge of planning a special meeting of the regional superintendents and judges. The school division acts as the fiscal agent in disbursement of the funds that are used for expenses related to the meeting. Roanoke County Schools is in charge of planning the meeting during the 2000-2001 school year and therefore is the fiscal agent. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: A grant of $2,000 has been awarded Roanoke County Schools to be used for expenses related to the special superintendents/judges regional meeting. Funds from this grant will be used strictly to cover expenses related to the meeting which is planned for March 19, 2001. FISCAL IMPACT: None, no matching required. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Appropriation of the $2,000 grant to an account to be used strictly to cover expenses related to the 2000-2001 regional superintendents and judges meeting. Linda H. Weber Superintendent Signature: ACTION Elmer C. Hodge Coun y Adm~~istrator ~ ~%,~ VOTE No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens motion to Church _ x Denied ( ) approve Johnson _ x Received ( ) McNamara- x _ Referred ( ) Minnix _ x To ( ) Nickens _ x cc: File Danial Morris, Director, Finance Dr. Linda Weber, School Superintendent Brenda Chastain, Clerk, School Board AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY MARCH 27, 2001 RESOLUTION 032701-8 CERTIFYING THE CLOSED MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened a closed meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such closed meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the closed meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the closed meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Certification Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~. Cc~LC.e__.`„ Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Closed Meeting File A-032701-7 . b ACTION ## ITEM NUMBER ~-+~ MEETING DATE: March 27, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: Carillon Community Health Fund COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS w~`' BACKGROUND: A grant proposal was submitted on Dec. 1, 2000 to help provide funding for two part-time school nurses. One is assigned to Northside High School and one to William Byrd High School. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Roanoke County Schools has been selected for the grant award in the amount of $20,000 for its school nurse initiative. (see attached) FISCAL IMPACT: February 28, 2002. 2001, June 1, 2001, The cycle for the grant is March 1, 2001 to $5,000 will be paid on or around March 1, October 1, 2001 and January 1, 2002. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Appropriation of the $20,000 grant to the school nurse program with Carillon Community Health Funds. Lavern H. Davis, RN, MSN Elmer C. Hodge Supervisor of~,Health~ r~ vices Co ty Adr~~ rator Signature: ~~~~~ l/dju-c~,~ ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens motion to Church _ x _ Denied ( ) approve Johnson _ x Received ( ) McNamara- x Referred ( ) Minnix _ x _ To ( ) Nickens _ x cc: File Lavern H. Davis, Supervisor of Health Services Danial Morris, Director, Finance Dr. Linda Weber, School Superintendent Brenda Chastain, Clerk, School Board .~ ~A1~ILION Health System January 16, 2001 Ms. Lavern Davis Supervisor of Health Services Roanoke County Schools 5937 Cove Road Roanoke, VA 24019 Dear Ms. Davis: On behalf of the Carilion Community Health Fund, we are delighted to inform you that Roanoke County Schools has been selected for a grant award in the amount of $20,000 for its School Nurse Program. The cycle for this grant is March 1, 2001, to February 28, 2002. This Letter of Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the Letter) sets forth the terms of your grant and the manner in which it will be administered. It includes a description of your project; the specific personnel, items or operations for which the CCHF will pay; specific goals the project should meet; reporting requirements; payment process; evaluation criteria; and other items. As project manager, please review this letter carefully so that you understand, and are in agreement with, the stated terms. It is important that this office communicate with one person in your organization. If the grant proposal author will not be serving in this capacity for the year long award cycle, please forward a letter to this office identifying the project manager. Two original letters shall be signed: one for your records as the designated project manager, and the other for Carilion Health System records. Please return one signed original copy of the letter to Susan Gring, Director of Carilion Health System, Community Partnerships, 7 Albemarle Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia 24016, by February 10, 2001. The first payment will be distributed approximately 90 days following the grant proposal deadline, the signing of this Letter, and the project manager's mandatory attendance at a Grantee Orientation Forum in the Community Room of the Community Medical Building (adjacent to Carilion Roanoke Community Hospital) on Friday, February 16, 2001, at 2:00 p.m. Please call Judy Hosey at (540) 224-6971 to make arrangements for your attendance. s-~ Fr71LY;:`#+6~rt -.. *' :: ,.~5. r - ~. ~: r, :.. .,: w' ~~.n.. ...... ~: .......~: . , 1 ; . ' ,Mx~. , ... ~ .. , n :1:".-... _... .. . 4 x ... ~. r .. .. .,- ~.. ..::'~`~ /%n5a. v:. A:k'EYl:.bbi WXw".+ioCKWw{. dew/kG1,i dk1C~ Post Office Box 13727 Roanoke, Virginia ?4036-3727 Telephone 540-981-7900 CARILION COMMUNITY HEALTH FUND ~.- PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Continuation of school nurse initiative to provide high school students with health assessments, education, case management services, and medication administration. Desired outcomes include enhanced academic performance, reduced health problems and school absences. USE OF FOUNDATION FUNDS: Funds will be used in partial support of nurses' salaries. SPECIFIC PROJECT OBJECTIVES: 1) There will be evidence of successful grade or program completion, served by the school nurse. This outcome will be evaluated by examining student records and obtaining feedback from guidance counselors and teachers. 2) Monthly reports submitted by school nurses will reflect that more students are being returned to class that are assessed by the nurse than check out to go home sick. 3) Monthly documentation will show evidence regarding the number of contacts with parents, physicians, and other community agencies and how those contacts are working to meet that community's needs, resources, perspectives, and standards. 4~ Monthly documentation will demonstrate enhanced efforts to enrol( children into CMSIP or Medicaid with date evidencing progress included on CCHF regular reports. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: As stated at the Grantee Orientation, the Roanoke County Schools must submit two copies of the progress report to the CCHF at the end of each reporting period. There are two reporting periods in the grant cycle. Site visit will follow receipt of the first report. The second report should provide an overview of the past five months of activity and should predominantly focus on program effectiveness and measurable program outcomes. The following schedule shows when each CCHF report is due to the Office of Community Partnerships. ANNUAL REPORTING CYCLE u:..]YI..;S..:A: APRIL 1 CYCLE DECEMBER 1 CYCLE Report Grant Cycle Begins Report Deadline Grant Cycle Begins Deadline First Award Payment (pending First Award Payment (pending receipt of letter and orientation receipt of letter and orientation July 1 attendance) March 1 attendance) October 1 Second Award Payment June 1 Second Award Payment First Report Due - 2 copies. December 15 Firsf Report Due - 2 copies August 15 January *SITE VISITS September *SITE VISITS (Jan.15,16,17, (Sept. 4,5,6,7,12,13,19,20,21,2001) 23,24,25,28,29,30,2002) Third Award Payment (pending February 1 Third Award Payment (pending October 1 receipt of report and successful site receipt of report and successful site visit) visit) New Funding Cycle for Grant New Funding Cycle for Grant April 1° Renewals.' - - December 1. Renewals*,_ *Repeat Program Prooosals *Repeat Program Proposals .... ....:..,a ,,...;,. M, , demonstrating successful"reports " ~ ` `~ `' " ~` ~ demonstrating°succe repo s'"""'°" (including community need/indicators (including community ' and outcomes) need only submit need/indicators and outcomes) executive summary sheet (no page need only submit executive . limit) to incude new proposal summary sheet (no page limit) to ' ob'ectives, certificate of tax exem t ectives, include new ro osal ob ~:-~. January 16, 2001 Page 3 of 5 status, and demonstration of progress toward self sustenance of program along with budget proposal. certificate of tax exempt status, and demonstration of progress toward self sustenance of program along with budget proposal. May 1 Fourth Award Payment January 1 Fourth Award Payment July 15 Second and Final Report Due - 2 March 15 Second and Final Report Due - 2 copies (final report should copies (final report should indicate progress toward indicate progress toward objectives and measurable objectives and measurable outcomes) outcomes) PAYMENT PROCESS: Grant payments will be made in four installments and processed as follows*: First Payment On or about the 1~` of the month following submission of (1/4 of CCHF award) the signed Letter and attendance at Grantee Orientation $5,000 Workshop. {February 16) Second Payment On or about the 15` of the month. (June or (1/4 of CCHF award) October) $5,000 Third Payment On or about the 1~ of the month following receipt and (1/4 of CCHF award) successful review of the First Progress Report and site $5,000 visit. (October or February) Fourth Payment On or about the 1~ of the month. (January or May) (1/4 of CCHF award) $5, 000 *On time payments cannot be guaranteed if reports are received late, and no award payments will be issued if reports are not submitted.. EXPENDITURES OF GRANT FUNDS: The grant is for the purpose(s) stated in this Letter. The funds provided may be spent only in accordance with the terms set forth herein. The School Nurse Program is subject to modification only with CCHF prior written approval. Expenses charged against this grant may not be incurred prior to the date the grant period begins or subsequent to its termination date, and may be incun'ed only as necessary to carry out the purpose(s) and activities of the approved project. .,,. _.,,. , _ The grantee organization is responsible for the expenditure of funds and for maintaining adequate,.,. ,_, , supporting records consistent with generally accepted accounting practices. The CCHF reserves the right w ~~ ~°~°° ~ to audit the financial recorcJs, review insurance coverage of the grantee organization; and-other records asp: ~ ~ x° ~, w~x,~,~w~,; appropriate. January 16, 2001 Page 4 of 5 PROJECT EVALUATION: As stated during the Grantee Orientation, the CCHF will evaluate each project utilizing several instruments which shall include: progress reports, site visits, identifiable reports indicating progress toward achievement of outcomes, patient/client satisfaction surveys, partner assessment surveys, and othec relevant data. These instruments will be used to determine: the extent to which the School Nurse Program has met its objectives. the Roanoke County Schools progress in generating or attracting resources to sustain the School Nurse Program. the extent of community commitment and support for the School Nurse Program. the cost-effectiveness of the School Nurse Programs approach. the overall value of the School Nurse Programs approach to enhancing community health. PUBLIC RELATIONS/COMMUNICATIONS: At the Grantee Orientation, the CCHF provided its grantees with information and a brief description of the CCHF activities. A copy of the Letter was distributed to the Roanoke County Schools where grantees were informed that upon signature of the Letter, the Roanoke County Schools agrees to cite CCHF for its support wherever possible. In addition, the Roanoke County Schools agrees to provide designees of the CCHF with opportunities to participate in public events which highlight the project; respects and agrees to requests from the CCHF to participate in or to provide pictures, photo opportunities, or written materials for promotion purposes; and agrees to respect and protect the proprietary rights of CCHF with regard to data, research and original information. Published materials should specifically mention Carilion Community Health Fund s support, and copies of published materials shall be provided to the Office of Community Partnerships as soon as they become available:. The Office of Community Partnership encourages submission of relevant success stories and photographs as they add realism to stakeholders' understanding of CCHF programs. CONFIDENTIALITY: The organization of the CCHF, its grant making and monitoring policies and procedures and its grant application and other materials are proprietary and confidential information. The Roanoke County Schools agrees to maintain the confidentiality of such information and, except as provided under Public Relations/Communications above, agrees not to share such information with others without the prior written consent of the CCHF. The Roanoke County Schools has shared or will share certain grant application and periodic reports. The CCHF agrees to maintain the confidentiality of such information and, except as provided under Public Relations/Communications above, agrees not to share such information with others without the prior ~,vritten consent of the Roanoke County Schools. .- , SPECIAL PROVISIONS: ;r;. A condition of this grant is that the Roanoke County Schools is an exempt organization as defined in Section 501(c) (3) of the Intemal Revenue Code. All grants are made and all funds should be used in accordance with current and applicable laws and pursuant to the Intemal Revenue Code, as amended, and the regulations issued thereunder_ The Roanoke County Schools must maintain its exempt organization status throughout the term of the grant and agrees to notify the CCHF of any termination or attempted termination of such status by the Intemal Revenue Service during the grants term. EXTRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCES: In the event of the Roanoke County Schools failure to perform or to comply with a substantial -= portion of the terms of this Letter, the CCHF reserves the right to terminate this grant: ~ The CCHF also ~ •- ~., - ~~ • ~~~~-~~- of`ari yapplicable law,-rulle orr regulation or would`vio to thettemis of`any cohttact o agreemeriC`~`"'"~`'""°"'""~"~' olatio ~" to which Carilion Health System or any of its affiliates is a party. December 2000 Page 5 of 5 _ ~~ LIMIT OF COMMITMENT: Unless otherwise stipulated in writing, this grant is made with the understanding that the CCHF has no obligation to provide other or additional support to the grantee organization. We extend best wishes on the award and much success with your project. Sincerely, Lucas a ital Carillon Medical Center ~~' r Charles I. Lunsford, Ghairtnan of the Board Carillon Medical Center We agree to all terms and conditions set forth in the Letter of Agreement, and understand that the Roanoke County Schools will receive its first grant payment on or about the first of the month following CCHF's receipt of a signed copy of this Letter and attendance at the Grantee Orientation Workshop. (~ ~ LaVem Davis Board of Directors, Chairperso Project Manager Roanoke County Schools Roanoke County Schools _ Tlsrl~ ~ Date aj~fo} Date .4.... ~ ..:.. ... P,PIAA7~.~.:::.:,jM'NAf..lk+e~."A~ri .. .. u:.:u.a.a ..Y9 ~; :: :.w.. y.M,.. ~. -, ~.::. :'<.. .iwt'M.W~~....., .., .. ~:.... .: ..vs:rt ...4•:•s=ii='F~:'7' 6,;:+IKk r`FSS•...'C tlV.AM4TJ'•t.:3~2:W'LwSIP:~:4~1~e A-032701-7. c ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~'" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 27, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: Donation of "IVEw PUMP sTaTION LoT #1" in connection with the Read Mountain Water System, as shown on plat recorded in Plat Book 23, Page 112, from F & W Community Development Corporation to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, located in the Hollins Magisterial District COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~ .y/,~ ~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This consent agenda item involves the donation of the following parcel of land to serve as a pump station for the County, in connection with the purchase of the Read Mountain Water System in the Hollins Magisterial District, to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County: a) Donation from F & W COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a Virginia corporation, of the fee simple interest in a parcel of land, consisting of 0.226 acre, shown and designated as "IVEw PUMP sTaTION LoT #1" upon that certain plat entitled `Plat Creating New Pump Station Lot #1 -Property of F & W Community Development Corporation', dated March 29, 2000, prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C., of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County in Plat Book 23, Page 112, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. FISCAL IMPACT: No County funding is required. ~ ""' ~~ STAFF RECONIlVIENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of the donation. Respectfully submitted, Vi ie . Huffma Sr. Asst. County orney ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens motion to Church _ x Denied () approve Johnson _ x Received () McNamara- x _ Referred () Minnix _ x To () Nickens _ x _ cc: File Vickie L. Huffman, Senior Assistant County Attorney Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Exhibit A ~'. N ~i . - ~ NOTE ~ 1.3 ~a~v ' a== -wnc.. sre°oN ro~ .:.; . ,. <:; ~ 1 ~ ~` ~ 1. THE E s cr/,u~ 4 '~ ?. uNEs 3 7H/S / /S NO. SiIALL 4/A/NT 4. IRON 1~au~vc Pavnav L~' rAx gaol-l-1 ' +Q ~E~Tr of F d~ W. CA{bl/(AWTY a~cao,~Nr CORP. Q ~, ~n ~,._ as .96,2 Pa s51 ~ 119.67 A(NE5 O ry O ~ ~ b £X/ST. 15' PUBLIC UfiITY EA~NT (P.d 17, PG d5J -~ „~ ~ W ~ c,j CY/Rbf' Ri .~ (,;, ~ Cl 52 ~. ~ ~ f \ ~r 4 ~37'F ~ N~ 100. 1n ~y- z a a NEW PUMP ~ 5 ~~Y w \ STAT/ON LOT N1 (0.226 AC.) 3 (1~E NOTF ~(TJ KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, TO W/T. THAT F. ~t W. CQVA/UAl/TY AEtEZQ°I/ENT CARPA4ADQV /S 1NE FEF S~iIiYE ONNER AND PRA°RIETLiP A~ TTIE LAND SfIONN HEREAN 70 BE 5UB0/NA'D, BOUNDED BY OUTS/UE (~14NL7/S 1 INRQ(/Q4 4 TCJ T, INLYUS/I~ M!/lL)'l CA{!f'R/SE5 PART L~ THE LANG C[AVVE'YED TO SAND ONNER BY LaEED fRAV ,L A/Q4R/5' Q4!/AIPAGYER, ET UX AS RELLwDED /N THE GYERKS Q~f7CE C~' THE pRGY//T LYX.6PT Q'' ROANAYE CIX/NTY, NRiG~'N/A, !N QEED B(XXf 96,Z PACE 651. 1F/E SA/D DINNER L3'.ATIi7E'S 1HAT /T HAS 57/6YkV1DED 1H/5 LAND, AS .9'IONN NEREGiI; £N77RELY HI1H /75 OMN FREE" NKL AND CQYSENT AND PL/RSUANT 7D AND /N CLi1f~UANGE' M/1H SECAQN JS?-??40 1NRU 2?76 4~ 7NE CQ~E Q~ NRdN/A LIB 195Q AS AA/ENQED 7TJ OATtr AND NITN ,SECAQV 17-f0 (/f LIB IHE ROANGWE Gt~'/NTY 57/BLYNSTLdY A4U~NANGL'S /N MIINESS 7F/E74EA~ /S HEl2~AY PLAG1~0 7HE FGYLON/NC 9Y.WATURE5 AND SEALS Cal/ 7H/S '~- 7 n / DAY Q'' ~U ~ y . ~ F, eF W. COMMON/TY DEVELOPMENT CORPORAT/ON BT1y~ ~ _ Y~ .ii"! ANLdR£W G KEZDER/AlX/SE; ~• ~. STATE OF V/RG/N/A (_'OLcMT y Q°' n Nak /, f;~ L~ L E n'C M 7Hom~ ~ A NOTARY fYBtIC /N AND FGW TNf AFQPE3A/D ~ c r~l~TY AND STALE 00 HDP®Y (11P7TFY 7HAT ANUPEW G KELDERHOUSE; Vl~E - P~2F5/DENT p~' F ~ W LY11/AKJN/TY L~'4fZQ°~UENT LCWPQ4AALW, NNOSE NAAlE /S .9'LAVED 7D THE fAPEGLYNC NR/T/NC DATED Mg2C.'-H Z 4 2Gaq HAS PER.SLiMA[LY .IPPEARED Ei~FAPE A/E /N AIY Af1WESA/D CEO U n/7Y ANO STA lE AND AQYVONLEDCED THE SAA/E CaV ~rca~LSSravEXPYRE~ YY1A2L'N 3l Zook GRAI ~h90~T RXPUBL/C .! A-032701-7.d ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER -~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 27, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: Request to approve donation of surplus vehicles to Explore Park COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~'Z~~~ BACKGROUND: The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors has provided fiscal, personnel, and material support to Virginia's Explore Park since its conception. On several occasions the Board has donated vehicles and equipment that are surplus and excess to the needs of Roanoke County. Scott Sarver, Explore Park's Senior Director of Facilities Management, has made a written request for another such donation. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Due to fiscal restraints, Explore Park has not been able to acquire new replacement vehicles for the care and maintenance of grounds and facilities. Roanoke County has a number of vehicles in surplus and waiting sale at auction. These vehicles tend to be old, high mileage vehicles that are removed from the fleet because of age, condition, or excessive repair cost. Explore Park has made a request that several of these excess vehicles be donated to the park in order to help with facilities maintenance. The Park will not typically use these vehicles outside of the park area, so condition and repair status are less important issues. The request and donation are comparable to past experience and conform to Board policy in such situations. A copy of the letter of request is attached. The original request for three vans has been amended to two due to the high cost of repair and safety issues related to the 1992 Chevrolet Astro Van, J92500. FISCAL IMPACT: At auction these vehicles would be expected to bring $500 to $750 each due to the age, mileage and condition. Total loss to the auction accounts is estimated to be less than $1,500. No actual capital outlay on the part of Roanoke County is anticipated. s-y STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends granting the donation request. Explore Park will assume any cost of transportation, registration or repair. Respectfully Submitted by: John D. Willey Property Manager Approved by: ~~ ~l Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens motion to Church _ x _ Denied () approve Johnson _ x Received () McNamara- x Referred () Minnix _ x To () Nickens _ x cc: File John D. Willey, Property Manager Danial Morris, Director, Finance .~-'( County of Roanoke Department of Property Management Mr. John D. Willey Post Office Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 22 February 2001 Dear Mr. Willey, On behalf of Virginia's Explore Park, I would like to request a donation of the following surplus vehicles: #PR758 1970 Ford van #J92500 Chevrolet Astro van #PR979 Dodge van These vehicles will be extremely useful in the care and maintenance of our facilities and in the fulfillment of our mission. Thank you. Sincerer„ ~;-' ~~ ~` ~, ~- f, ~,, Scott Sarver Senior Director, Facility Moment Milepost I IS on the Blue Ridge Parkway Administered by Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority Virginiz Code § 10. I -1600 et seq. in partnership with The River Foundation, Inc. LR.C. §501 (c) (3) Post Office &~x 8508 Roanoke, Virginia 24014-0508 (540)427.1800 FAX (540) 427.1880 www.explorepark.org V 1 It V 11V 1 h J EXPLORE PARK l' ._ ACTION NO. A-032701-7. e ITEM NO. ~~-~" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 27, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: Acceptance of Donation of Two Sanitary Sewer Easements on Lots 12 and 13, and Lots 14 and 15, Section 18, Woodbridge, in the Catawba Magisterial District, from Waldrop Development Corporation to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS ~~ ~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This consent agenda item involves acceptance of the following easements conveyed to the Board of Supervisors for sanitary sewer purposes, in connection with finalizing portions of the sanitary sewer system for development of the subdivision of Woodbridge, Section 18, in the Catawba Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke: a) Donation of two sanitary sewer easements, each twenty feet (20') in width, on Lots 12 and 13, and Lots 14 and 15, Section 18, Woodbridge, from Waldrop Development Corporation, a Virginia corporation, (Deed Book 1309, page 680; Plat Book 23, page 69; Tax Map Nos. 56.01-5-12, 56.01-5-13, 56.01-5-14, and 56.01-5-15) as shown on a plat prepared by Balzer and Associates, Inc., dated August 17, 2000, a copy of which is attached hereto. The location and dimensions of these easements have been reviewed and approved by the County's engineering staff. ,. STAFF RECONIMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of this easement. Vickie L`. Huffm~ Sr. Asst. County .~.r ~,..,.. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens motion to Church _ x Denied () approve Johnson _ x _ Received () McNamara- x Referred () Minnix _ x To () Nickens _ x cc: File Vickie L. Huffman, Senior Assistant County Attorney Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Respectfully submitted, h ~ Z o u W~ e NIA W o Ul \~G Z C~' ~ ~ Z ~ , ~ ~ ~ °y~ yu~~i z }~~ Wc _ F- ~l U O O ~ < m g H LL a Z ~~ a p O ~ O , ~ ~ 4 BOO WOU~ ~NOO r ~'~ O~ N i ~ rc II tip~0 ~ N n-~~ =U1Uj~m NwZppOc ~~VV OOrn~ _tn ~> ZQQOZ~WO~p~Y~~O~.. OW ~ `w~WW~~O~W>-mQ O~ ~~ W ~~ Z Y ~ m Y W O U ~~ O WOOU~p~Zcr g30?-'N `° od oho Q~ ~ ~~ ~a~N I co`j' I N~ ~ a~ J U ~ ~ w X I~ v O Q 1~ Z I I I ~O ~ I I ~ f- I U O d ? 4: ~~~ ~ O a ~~' l ti l 3„~O,bti.S l S w~ ~ o ~_, w I N~ p N fn OD 00 I uj C~ ~ O o f ,~ Q~ I ~a_ I o '' ° N ~_ O I I ~~O N O I HND ~ C rn ON[O 3 O NmOi I ~ - I I ~o~ W ^~ IX p ~ ~ Z N Wd ~ ~ I ~ _ o ~ - - - - - J U O W O ~ ~ ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ "~ N ~. ~ ~ ~ v Z > I ~ Q ~ ~I `~' a ~, ~ ~ OO W m e- I p0 N LJ~ ~ N ~- O 0 0 0 ~ a I~oN p ~I ~ °° o o~ o p `n J 3 ~ ('`~ N I o U~ ~ J \ ~ ~ ~ ~ t0 r. ~ ~ ~ c0 w~~~ ~ io o ,SO~ l ti l 3„ti0,t~t.S l S w~ ~ ~ 0 of d t0 w ~ I N N C 7 ~ Z c.i ~n ,n a ~ 2 wp `~ z Wo I MQI o I.- o`- ~ D .- ~- O O N O Mj '~ oOY~ ~--- °° ~ I I oN~ 3 p I Nm~ N ~~,~~ ~ O 00 `~ ~ ~ O w u'I W n. ~ ~ I ., ~OmO O i ~ Z -N~- ~0~~ 3w~co Z ------- - ~~ .O ~ .. cii 69 - - ---- --- ~~"~,~ ~d I ,98~Ot l 3„t0,titi.S l S~ ~ ~ ~^ o z m £'Z 8 ~d N `n ~~ c~i p ~ m ~w O O J NQ~ O O~ Q o ~ Z p ml ~- _I w ~ Vl ~ Q ~ ~I ~ry0 I Q~ Z w J ~ ~ '~o ~ p Z~ X ~ ~oJ~ I ~~ o . z `- ~' ~ a o ,L9'Ot l 3.,t0,t~t~.S l S ~_~ I I I I ~ ~ .- u) °' ~ I I ~~ I ~ Z 1~ F- O Y Q N~ ~ I I ~J ~ I ~ ~ Z Y ~ O U F- ~- J ACTION NO. ITEM NO. /`~ - ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 27, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Worksession on May 8, 2001 to Discuss Future Ridgetop/Mountainside Development Ordinance. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: As a result of the visioning process and input from citizens, Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors during the Community Plan development process, staff has begun preliminary work on scoping out aridgetop/mountainside development ordinance. On May 8, staff will discuss with you various options for developing such an ordinance, goals, objectives and potential strategies. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: Schedule a worksession on May 8, 2001 to discuss with staff the potential development of a ridgetop/mountainside protection ordinance. Respectfully Submitted, Janet Scheid, Senior Planner Department of Community Development ACTION Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Motion by: Approved, f e,~x..~.c.. G . ,~~ yt-- Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator VOTE No. Yes Abs Church Johnson ,McNamara Minnix Nickens ACTION NO. y ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 27, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Joint Work Session with the School Board on April 10, 2001 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: On March 15, 2001, Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Chairman Fuzzy Minnix and Roanoke County School Board Chairman Mike Stovall met with Elmer Hodge, Linda Weber, Diane Hyatt, and Penny Hodge to discuss the budget. At that time, it was suggested that the School Board return for a joint work session with the Board of Supervisors on April 10, 2001. The School Board will submittheirbudget to the County by April 1, 2001. This document will be distributed to the Board members as soon as it is received. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends a joint work session with the School Board during the April 10, 2001 Board meeting. Respectfully Submitted by ~1 ~e2-.~,~ PJ . b~~~fJ Diane D. Hyatt Chief Financial Officer Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Motion by: Approved by: ~~~~ ~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE No. Yes Abs Church Johnson McNamara Minnix Nickens GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE COUNTY OFROANOKE,VIRGINIA ~1/•-I of General Amount Fund Revenue Audited Beginning Balance at July 1, 2000 $9,908,641 8.33% ct 24, 2000 Funds for twenty additional paramedic firefighters (907,000) and planning for renovations to Vinton, Read Mountain, and Mason Cove stations ec 19, 2000 County's half share in Phase I Construction Costs (500,000) for McDonald Farm business park Dec 19, 2000 Advance of funds for water and sewer improvements (500,000) for the Stable Road Water and Sewer District ($418,766) and traffic signal and road improvement ($81,234) in the Clearbrook community Jan 9, 2001 Matching funds for TEA-21 grant to construct the Green Hill Park section of the Roanoke River Greenway ($41,700) Balance at March 27, 2001 $7,959,941 6. Changes below this line are for information and planning purposes only. Balance from above Jan 23,2001 Potential use for Phase II NPDES stormwater assessment $7,959,941 (40,000) $7,919,941 6. Note: On December 18, 1990, the Board of Supervisors adopted a goal statement to maintain the General Fund Unappropriated Balance at 6.25% of General Fund Revenues 2000 - 2001 General Fund Revenues $118,982,797 6.25% of General Fund Revenues $7,436,425 Respectfully Submitted, Approved By ~~~ Danial Morris Elmer C. odge Director of Finance County Administrator CAPITAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Amount Balance from June 27, 2000 Board meeting $279,722.09 Addition for sale of land and equipment during 1999-2000 303,501.34 Audited beginning balance at June 30, 2000 583,223.43 Transfer from 1999-2000 departmental savings 224,701. Balance at March 27, 2001 $807,924.43 Respectfully Submitted, Danial Morris Director of Finance Approved By, ~`~~~~~ Elmer C. H d g County Administrator N-a ib-3 RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Amount From 2000-2001 Original Budget $100,000. July 25, 2000 Contribution to D-Day Memorial (10,000.00) Sept 12,2000 Video distribution for Senior and Challenged Citizens Commission (1,000.00) Sept 12,2000 Project Impact (12,800.00) Jan 9, 2001 VML/VACO Assessment, AEP Negotiations (4,183.00) Feb 27, 2001 Purchase of Automated External Defribillators (60,000.00) Feb 27, 2001 Agreement with SMPAC to provide information to SCC (5,000.00) Balance at March 27, 2001 $7,017.00 Respectfully Submitted, Danial Morris Director of Finance Appr ved By, Elmer C. od e~~ g County Administrator 1 FUTURE SCHOOL CAPITAL RESERVE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Savings from 1996-1997 debt budget $670,000.00 Transfer from County Capital Projects Fund 1,113,043.00 FY1997-1998 Original budget appropriation 2,000,000.00 une 23, 1998 Savings from 1997-1998 debt fund 321,772.00 FY 1998-1999 Original budget appropriation 2,000,000.00 FY1999-2000 Original budget appropriation 2,000,000 Less increase in debt service (1,219,855) 780,145.00 lovember 9, 1999 Savings from 1998-1999 debt fund 495,363.00 FY2000-2001 Original budget appropriation 2,000,000 Less increase in debt service (1,801,579) 198,421.00 Balance at March 27, 2001 served for Future School Operations FY2000-2001 Original budget appropriation y 11, 2000 SW Co Regional Stormwater Balance at March 27, 2001 $7,578,744.00 $1,500,000.00 (290,000.00) 1,210,000.00 * Of this amount $736,680 is currently being used for the lease purchase of refuse vehicles and will be repaid within two years. Respectfully Submitted, Danial Morris Director of Finance App ved By, E mer C. H e~ County Administrator t ACTION NO. • ° ITEM NUMBER ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER. MEETING DATE: March 27, 2001. AGENDA ITEMS: Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per I nvestment and Portfoli o Policy, as of February 28, 2001. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: BANKERS ACCEPTANCE: BANK OF AMERICA 989,894.44 BRANCH BANKING &TRUST 4,564,494.92 5,554,389.36 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSITS: FIRST AMERICAN 100,000.00 SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA SAVINGS & LOAN 100,000.00 200,000.00 COMMERICAL PAPER: ALEX BROWN 1,981,016.11 BANK OF AMERICA 991,171.11 PAINE-WEBBER 1,982,967.78 SUNTRUST 991,608.33 WACHOVIA 1,999,329.44 7,946,092.77 LOCAL GOVT INVESTMENT POOL: GENERAL FUND 8,353,775.48 RESOURCE AUTHORITY 1,997,968.65 10,351,744.13 MONEY MARKET: SUNTRUST 2,839,457.76 FIRST UNION 2,183,447.46 PAINE-WEBBER 4,241,679.49 9,264,584.71 CASH INVESTMENTS: SUNTRUST 15,626,824.98 LB&T 3,456,249.20 MENTOR (GEN. OPER) 5,672,963.76 MENTOR (RES. AUTH.) 6,041,608.51 WACHOVIA 2,496,624.62 33,294,271.07 TOTAL 66,611,082.04 Pg 1 of 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER. MEETING DATE: Mal'Ch 27, 2~~1 AGENDA ITEMS: Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investment and Portfolio Policy, as of February 28, 2001. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Respectfully Submitted by -,~ i ~ /: Alfred C. Anderson County Treasurer ACTION Approved ()Motion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To () Approved by: ~-`~' Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Church Johnson McNamara Minnix Nickens VOTE No Yes Abs N-~ Page 2 of 2 d~41 Pgr~ I, 1~ ~i I I ~~ ~ ~ n ~ o °~,... ~' C®10~1[~®NW~ALT~ o f VgR~INIA CHARLES D. NOTTINGHAM COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1401 EAST BROAD STREET RICHMOND, 2321lY2000 March 6, 2001 Mr. Elmer C. Hodge Roanoke County P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Dear Mr. Hodge: N~ JAMES S. GNENS STATE SECONDARY ROADS ENGINEER The enclosed report contains a list of all changes to the Secondary System of State Highways in your county approved by the State Secondary Roads Engineer in February 2001. All additions to and abandonments from the Secondary System are effective the day they are approved by the State Secondary Roads Engineer. This date appears in the far right column of the monthly report. These changes will be presented to the Commonwealth Transportation Board at its monthly meeting on March 15, 2001. If you have any questions or comments about this report, please call Martin Law at 786-7399. James S. Givens /~-- State Secondary a s ngineer JSG/MII CC : Qhnui-C_cL- ~at~--~ ~A,,,^ rjk~. ~.Q~f-vw~ V_ J WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ! ~ l AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 27, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: CONSENT JUDGMENT AND DECREE GRANTING ROANOKE COUNTY'S REQUEST FOR EXEMPTION FROM COVERAGE PURSUANT TO SECTION 4(b) OF THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT, 42 U.S.C. § 1973b(b) COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: /~ ~, /~'"' `~~ ~ , ~~ ~'~ ~~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Attached you will find a copy of the Consent Judment and Decree from the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia granting Roanoke County an exemption from certain provisions of the Voting Rights Act, and in particular, the preclearance requirements for certain voting changes. Respectfully submitted, P~ m . ~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Vote No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Johnson McNamara Minnix Nickens Church G:\ATTORNEY\PMM\AGENDA\bailout.consent decree.fru~ i • • IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, Plaintiff, v. ) C.A. No. 1:00CV0194G JANET RENO, Attorney General (RMU, ~ST~ ~ ) of the United States of AmericG ) (three-judge court) BILL LANN LEE, Assistant Attorney General, Civil Rights Division, ~ ~ ~ ~ p"~ Defendants . JAN 2 4 2001 f~IIICYMAYEk WNITTINGTDN, CLARK CONSENT JUDGMENT AND DECRED U.S.DISIRICTCDURT This action was initiated by Roanoke County, a politica= subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia (hereafter "the County"). The County is subject to the provisions of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, as amended. 42 U.S.C. ~ 1973c. The County seeks a declaratory judgment under Section 9 of the Voting Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. ~ 1973b. A three-judge Court has been convened as provided in 92 U.S.C. § 1973b(a)(5) and 28 U.S.C. ~ 2284. Section 4(a) of the Voting Rights Act provides that a State or political subdivision subject to the special provisions of the Act may be exempted from those provisions if it can demonstrate in an action for a declaratory judgment before the United States District Court for the District of Columbia that it has both (1) complied with the Voting Rights Act during the ten-year period prior to filing the c~~~ SO • n-~~ action; and (2 ,l taken positive steps both to encourage minority political participation and to remove structural barriers to minority electoral influence. To demonstrate compliance with the Voting Rights Act during the ten year period preceding the filing of the declaratory judgment action under Section 4(a), Roanoke County and its Governmental units must prove the following five conditions: (1) that they have not used any test or device that has the purpose or effect of denying or abridging the right to vote on account of race or color; (2) no fina~ judgment of any Court of the United States has determined that denials or abridgements of the right to vote on account of race or color have occurred anywhere in the County and its governmental unitti and no consent decree, settlement, or agreement has been entered into before or during the pendency of the declaratory judgment action that results in the abandonment of such a practice; (3) no Federal examiners under the Voting Rights Act have been assigned to the County or its governmental units; (9) the County and its governmenta] units have complied with Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, including submission of all changes covered by Section 5 and repeal of all covered changes to which the Attorney General has successfully objected or the District Court of the District of Columbia has denied a declaratory judgment; and (5) the Attorney General has not interposed any objection not overturned by final judgment of a court - 2 - • ~ n-7 and no Section 5 declaratorv ~udament action has been denied, witr. respect to any submissions by the County and its governmental units, and no such submissions or declaratory judgment actions are pending. 92 U.S.C. ~ 1973b(a) (1) (A)-(E; . In addition, Roanoke County and its aovernmental units must demonstrate the steps they have taken to encourage minority politica] participation and to remove structural barriers to minority electora~ influence by showing the foliowinq: (1) elimination of votinc procedures and elections methods which inhibit or dilute equal access to the electoral process; (2) constructive efforts to eliminatF intimidation and harassment of persons exercising rights protected under the Voting Rights Act; and (3) other constructive efiort~, suc}~ as convenient registration and voting for every person of votinc age and the appointment of minority persons as election officials throughout the County and at all stages of the election and registration process. 42 U.S.C. ~ 1973b(a)(1)(F)(i)-(iii). To assist the Court in determining whether to issue a declaratory judgment, Roanoke County and its aovernmental units also must present evidence of minority participation, including the levels of minority group registration and voting, changes in those levels over time, and disparities between minority-group and non-minority- group participation. 42 U.S.C. ~ 1973b(a)(2). Furthermore, the County and its governmental units must demonstrate that during the - 3 - • N~~ ten years preceding ~udament they have nct violated any provision of the Constitution or federal, state, or local law governing voting discrimination, unless they show any such violations were trivial, promptly corrected, and not repeated. 42 U.S.C. § 1973b(a)(3). Finally, Roanoke County and its governmental units must publicize their intent to commence a declaratory judgment action and any proposed settlement of the action. 42 U.S.C. § 1973b(a)(4). If Roanoke County and its governmental units show "objective and compelling evidence" that they have satisfied the foregoing requirements, as confirmed by the Department's independent investigation, the Attorney General is authorized to consent to entry of a judgment granting an exemption to coverage under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. 92 U.S.C. § 1973b(a)(9). The Defendant United States has conferred with Plaintiff Roanoke County and, upon investigation, has agreed that the Plaintiff is entitled to the requested declaratory judgment, subject to annual reporting requirements for a period of four years to which the parties have agreed as a basis for resolving this action. 42 U.S.C. § 1973b(a)(9). The parties have filed a joint motion, accompanied by a Stipulation of Facts, for entry of this Consent Judgment and Decree. - 4 - ~'~ FINDING: Pursuant to the parties' Stipulations and joint motion, this Court finds as follows: i. Roanoke County is a political subdivision of thF Commonwealth of Virginia, and a political subdivision of a state within the meaning of Section 9(a) of the Voting Rights Act, 9~ U.S.C. ~ 1973b(a)(1). See Stipulation of Facts, 9[ 1. 2. There are two separate governmental units within Roanoke County: the town of Vinton and the Roanoke County School board. SeE Stipulation of Facts, 9[ 3. ~. The independent cities of kcanoke City, Virginia and Salem City, Virginia are not aovernmenta~ units of Roanoke County, Vlralnlc and are not parties to this bailout action. See Stipulation o~ Facts, 9I 4. 4. Roanoke County is a covered jurisdiction subject to the special provisions of the Voting Rights Act, including Section 5 of the Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1973c. See Stipulation of Facts, 9[ 5. 5. Roanoke County was designated as a jurisdiction subject to the special provisions of the Voting Rights Act on the basis of the determinations made by the Attorney General that Virginia maintained a "test or device" as defined by section 4(b) of the Act, 42 U.S.C. 1973b(b), on November 1, 1964, and by the Director of the Census that fewer than 50 percent of the persons of voting age residing in the - 5 - • ~ rv-7 state voted in the 1.964 presidential election. See Stipulation of Facts, 9[ 19. E. No person in Roanoke County has been denied the right tc vote on account of race or color during the past ten years. See Stipulation of Facts, 9[ 2~. i. Nc "test or device" as defined in Section 4(c) of the Voting Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. ~ 1973b(c), has been used in Roanoke County for the preceding ten years. See Stipulation of Facts, 9[ 2::. ~. No Court of the United States has issued a final judamen~ during the Last ten years prior to the commencement of this action that the right to vote has been denied or abridged on account of racF or color in Roanoke County, and no consent decree, settlement, or agreement has been entered into resulting in any abandonment of a voting practice challenged on such grounds during that time. No such claims presently are pending or were pending at the time this action was filed. See Stipulation of Facts, 9[ 24. 9. No voting practices or procedures have been abandoned by the County or challenged on the grounds that such practices or procedures would have either the purpose or the effect of denying the right to vote on account of race or color. See Stipulation of Facts, 9[ 2 5 . 10. No Federal Examiners have ever been appointed or assigned to Roanoke County pursuant to Section 3 or Section 6 of the Voting - 6 - • • n-~ Riahts ACS. See Stipulation of Facts, 9I 2E,. li. The Attorney General has not interposed any objection to G change affecting voting in koanoke County and no declaratory judgment has been denied under Section 5 of the Voting Riahts Act, and no suc}. submissions or declaratory ~udament actions are pending. koanokE County never has sought Section 5 judicial preclearance from thi_ Court. See Stipulation of Facts, 9[ 27. lam. The County does not employ any voting procedures o' methods of election that inhibit or dilute eaual access to thF electoral process in the County. See Stipulation of Facts, 9I 2~. 1~. The County and its aovernmental. units have not engaged ir. other constructive efforts to e]iminate intimidation and hara~:,mFn' of persons exercising rights protected under the Voting Riahts Ac. because there is no evidence that any such incidents have occurred in the County in the last ten years. See Stipulation of Facts, 9[ 2G. 14. The County and its aovernmental units have engaged in other constructive efforts that have provided expanded opportunity for convenient registration and voting for persons of voting age, and the County has appointed some minority persons as election officials. See Stipulation of Facts, 9[9[ 30-37. l~. No evidence of increased minority participation is available because Virginia does not track voter registration and turnout by racE. The overall level of voter registration has - 7 - ~ ~ Y~ ~ increased, although voter turnout hay dropped off in recent years fog reasons apparently unrelated to race. See Stipulation of Facts, 91 3~. 1E. There are no known incidents in koanoke County wherE persons exercising their right to vote at the polls have been intimidated or harassed. See Stipulation of Facts, 9l 39. l There is no evidence that the County has violated any provision of the Constitution or laws of the United States or any State or political subdivision with respect to discrimination in voting on account of race or color. See Stipulation of Facts, 9[ 90. 1~. Roanoke County has publicized the intended commencement of this action prior to its commencement in local newspapers of genera: circulation and in appropriate United States post offices throuahou~ the County in accordance with 42 U.S.C. ~1973b(a)(9) SeF Stipulation of Facts, 9[ 91. No aaarieved party has sought to intervene in this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ~1973b(a)(4). 1G. Roanoke County and the governmental units within the County have obtained Section 5 preclearance for all voting changes enforced within Roanoke County during the ten-year period preceding this action. However, preclearance was not obtained in a timely manner, i.e. before the changes were enforced, with respect to six annexations and boundary changes by the County and the town of Vinton, a March 16, 1992 amendment of Vinton's town charter that - ~ - N-~ permits town council members to become candidates for filling a vacancy in the mayoral seat, and an April 7, 199 amendment of Vinton's town charter that changes the timing of filling vacancies for mayor and town council member. All of these voting changes werE submitted to the Attorney General for Section 5 review immediately before the present action was fi~ec, and nave been precleared. SeF Stipulation of Facts, 9[ 21. 2G. As a basis for resolving this action, the parties havE agreed that Roanoke County will be subject to annual reporting requirements for a period of four years. The County will submit tc the United States an annual Report documenting all voting change adopted by the County as we71 as the two governmental units within the County during each calendar year. The first Report will be duE December lam, 2000, and subsequent Reports will be due each December 15, thereafter. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED: A. The Plaintiff Roanoke County, Virginia, is entitled to a declaratory judgment in accordance with Section 4(a)(1) of the Voting Rights Act, 92 U.S.C. ~ 1973b(a)(1); B. The parties' Joint Motion for Entry of Consent Judgment and Decree is GRANTED, and Roanoke County, including the town of Vinton and the Roanoke County School Board shall be exempt from coverage pursuant to Section 4(b) of the - 9 - ~ ~ N-7 Votinq Riahts Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1973b(b provided that koanoke County be subject to annual reporting requirement: as provided in paraaraph 2G, and provided that this Cour7 shall retain jurisdiction over this matter for a period o~ ten years. C. This action shall be closed and placed on this Court's inactive docket, subject to being reactivated upon application by either the Attorney General or any agarieved person in accordance with the procedures see forth in 92 U.S.C. ~1973b(a)(5~. D. The parties shall bear their own cosh . Entered this ~_ day of~ 2001. i UNITED ST CIRCUIT UDC U D STATES DISTRICT JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE - 10 - Approved as to form and content: For the Plaintiff Roanoke County, Virginia ,. ~ GERALD HEBERT J. Gerald Hebert, P.C. 5019 Waple Lang Alexandria, VA 2230 (703) 567-5873 DC Bar No. 94767E Paul Mahoney County Attorney Roanoke County P.C. Box 29800 5209 Bernard DrivF Roanoke, VA 24018-078 (540) 772-2007 For the Defendant Janet Reno and Bill Lann Lee: ~OSEPH D. RICH ~"~OBERT A. KENGLE JAMES T. TUCKER Attorneys, Voting Sectior, Civil Rights Division United States Department of JusticF P.O. Box 66128 Washington, D.C. 20035-6128 (202)514-6336 • N-7 WILMA A. LEWIS United States Attorney - 11 - ~'V-~~ _ . ( ~ 'b ~ ~ a O \ ~ N N O~ 7 '-' o ° ac ~~~ ~ °~ o ~. ~ww ~~ ~ ~ a. ~ N 0 ~ 0 y ~ v i o O M ~ ~ ~ . -i u c O~ O~ N .-~ d ~ u O~ M ~O 00 C ~O t~ '~ N N y N 67 ~' L C~ +~+ .G A 0 ., y ~ L d C y (~ ~ ~" v OA u p C 'b L 7 7 ~ OW y ~ L Z +r ~+ ;II O C O ~ W a~ OA 'C 7 b 0 C~ ~, d O 0 .~ 0 C 3 ~ .N.. ~ ~ V'1 ~ ~ ~ N ~O 0~0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M O ~ ~ ~ ~ N O 00 Q~ ~p ~n O~ oo N O O~ M O~ M M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~n N M ~ ~ .-r I~fj O ^-~ M O 1!n V' O~ h V 7 ~--~ O M ~ r ~ N ~--~ l~ O~ ~O O M oo ~O ~ ~O l~ ~--~ ~ N M ~ h N ~ ~O l~ N O ~, oo ~O v, ~O ~O r O ~O ~O V ~ ~O ~D l~ [~ M ~--~ ~ 01 M l~ O~ ~ ~O N O rr N ~ ~ v o O n rn C~ N \O I~ 01 \G d' (~ M O~ O ~n ~ O ~--~ 00 O ~ M O M M 00 r+ M O N ~n ~n ~n o0 o ri oo O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r; ~° ° ~ ,~ v~~ v~~ t~ ~ [~ O ~ ~ M N O~ 00 N O~ O~ ~n O N O 00 N ~O N 00 00 M 00 N 00 00 N 00 vi 00 l~ ~ --+ r ~--~ O ~n O~ M O M ~O ~O O~ ~"~ o0 00 ~O O~ N O o0 O~ O ~t ~ ~O ~O ~ ~ [~ ~n ,--~ O N ~ ~n .--~ M N N ~--~ [~ 00 [~ ~O O ~ O ~ ~ M N ~O o0 ~n O ~ vi N O~ ~ 00 ~n M ~-+ O N l~ ~O ~ ~O l~ ~ O l~ O\ N ~ M M M M 00 •-+ M l~ N -r 00 O ~O ~O N M M ~n [~ ~O M O 7 v1 O O~ ~O ~ oo ~ ~ .--~ O h ~ 00 ~ N ~--~ ~ ~ N O N O~ N l~ O~ ~D Q~ ~ 00 ~ ~ O 00 V ~ V ~O ~--~ N ~D M 00 l~ N vl 00 l~ N ~ V' ~n ~O ~D ~O 01 ~O ~D N N N M vl ~ M v'~ vl M ~ vl [~ ~ ~--~ 00 O~ N --+ ~+ ~O Vl ~ l~ O~ v~ ~ M ~O ~ ~O O M o0 l~ M O l~ O _ N M ~ M ~--~ M ~"~ •-• O~ ~ N ~ ~ O .-~ ~ N ~+ N N ~ O~ ~ ~ ~--~ ~ M O N U ~D ~ ~ ~ \O M M M M ~--~ ~--~ [~ N ~--~ 'V' O N O N N O~ .ti O v~ v~ O O O N O N M O er l0 ct N O M O O ~--~ ~ O et •--~ V N O 00 ~ H h M Vl 00 N M O O 7 .-i M l~ O M ~O ^~ .-i ~ ~ M ~ 00 N ~--~ N ^' ~ ~--~ N ~ ~t l~ l~ 00 N O O N O M ~ 00 ~O O~ N M ~O O 01 ~ M ~G ~ O M M t~ O~ ~O '-+ O~ ~ N of _ ~ O O~ ~O ~ ~ O O ~ O~ oo ~ N ~--~ 00 ~ oo M ~O ~--~ N ~ V') O N M ~/'~ Vl ~--i M ~O N V'i ~ .r ~p ~ M ~ ~--i O oo O 00 O M M O l~ O l~ O ~D ~D O~ ~ O In ~ O~ M ~ N ~ N ~ O 0 0 . -i N ~ O~ ~--~ ~O M \O O N v~ N O O oo O~ L w .[ .~ 'O «S Q .~ ~ ~ U ~L~. ~ Q ,,10h~ U ~ V ~, o C > °,~ ~ ~ =~ ~ o ~ ti ~ ~ Q WC7W o ^-~ N M O_ O_ O_ O O O O ~. ~ ~V U "C ;~ a ~ ~ Q ~ p U O o ~--~ N O O O O [~ O O O l~ N O O O N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 00 v'i oo O M O M ~ O M M [~ ~O N C^ O v1 ~ O ~--~ N O U V W "V ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ (~ o ~ N vVi o'~ ~'' ~ o ~ o U a W ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ •~ o ~; ~ ~ ~ W c U Q L o M o - . ~--~ N M 7 O O O O M M M M O O O O O~ 0 0 0 0 7 O v~ o0 0 0 0 M O ~ ~ oo O O N O U ~ ~--i ~ ~ ~ ~ Q~ O H ~--~ l~ V M N M O O N O~ l~ ~ l~ ~--i N O~ ~h ~ O v'> [~ N o0 ~O M v'1 N 00 00 00 00 00 M N O~ ~ ~ U O~ N O .~ N O 00 l~ ~ N ~O M ~D 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O ~--~ M o0 O .~ N ~ ~O O~ oo [~ O N M 00 N M ~--~ 00 \O 00 l~ ~ vl N ~ N O N M O O t~ ~ ~ M O O ~O N `O ~ M N O ~--i 'O .~ r V _y `•CJ L O ~ °~ 3 ~ ~ „ ~ v ~q~•~ oU 0. . Y ~ V1 ~~y ~ ~ ~ " ~ O fti N N j y C7 R; ~ W ~ C7 0 ~--~ N M 'V' ~n ~O 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O o0 0 0 0 0 0 00 O O O O N N O ~n O N M O O O O O [~ ~D ~--~ N O O~ O ~O O O oo M oo O v~ O ~O ~O N N o0 l~ vl N ~O 00 l~ U 00 .-~ Vl 00 N N ~ r - N -~ . . . -i '-+ N ~ In O O M 0 0 0 0 0 M O O d' O O O O O 7 v~ ~ O~ v~ O N O O Vi v-~ t~ oo •--~ •--~ O r .~ . -~ M O M I~ ~ ~ O ~ M v1 00 ~--~ ~ N O~ 7 V• O o0 0o M ~O M ~--~ ~--~ l~ o ~ U ~ Q •~+ ~ W ~ ~ ~ .~ Li U '" ~ ~ ~ '~ Q ~ U ice. O CO a~ ~, ~ N v' c~3 ~ ~ ~ ~ N Lr ~ ~ it " ~ .~ c~ '~ ~ c~ ~ ~ ~av°~Ua~v°~~ O o ~-^ M ~ Vl ~O [~ 00 O~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vl Vl V'1 ~/) Ul ul ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O M N N OD ~ 0. ~ ~ ,~ ~~,' C ~,,, ~ M ~ ~D V'1 M M M ~ 00 ~ Vl O O O O ' ~ M N QQ In ' ar N oo v~ N •-' t~ ~n ~ M O o0 v i O O O O O o0 ~ 00 O: p u u o .~ .-. ~O oo ~ v~ ~ oo a1 pp a1 ~ 01 O 7 M O M M ~.. a o ~ ~ v, v,~c v; v,~~a, ~ o0ov-, v, ... v~~ in ~n eLd fib ~ ~ W N ~ ~ ~ u i' v'~ ~ O ~••i O •"~ vl O ~O O ~O l~ O O O O '-•I ~ O ~ 00 a i y N N O ~ O M D, O N ~ '~ X 0 0 0 0 00 D1 O D\ ~ ~ u ~ ~ .-. - 00 ~ l~ O oo O ~ ~ ~ 10 a, vl ~ O O ~ ~ ~ 00 ~ R 00 .•-i u ~ M a, v Vl .-• 00 t In [ t [ O l~ N 00 v') N ~ n O O •--~ •--~ l 00 ,--~ l~ O O O ~ O ~ ~ N ~ eC m •--~ ~-+ M ~D N a1 00 ~••i O ~O ~O O vi N oo [~ [~ ~O ~ M v N •--~ ~ O N ~ 00 ~ M r+ ~t O v'~ l~ O C1 M 00 N tt •~ •-• N ~ Q\ .••i 01 01 .-i .~ N N ~O v u~ ° ~~ O V7 O~ v'~ O ~ O ~0 O O O O O ~O ~O O ~ 10 y . L~ 00 [~ O V? O ~O O O r ~~ .--~ 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 O N ~ O Q ~ oo [~ O '~t' O ~ O ~ O v~ M O 0 0 0 ~ 01 ~O ~ N .. "O ~ C ~ ~ _ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~, N M a\ 01 .-. ~ O V? N 01 a~ u i• d' a1 O !f ~O D, O ~O ~' .-• ,--~ O v'i 00 vi ~ O ~--i X. C ~ u 01 01 ~ In D\ M 01 00 '°+ v1 M ~ vi l~ O o0 O~ 01 (~ ~" .-. ~~ 00 M ~O N N v1 00 N N ~ O W ~ .--~ .--~ N ~--i .-, ~--i M M r pp v ~O N O 00 O O M O M 0 0 00 O O O O 00 O O O ~D q ~ ~ l~ O ti 0 0 0 rt O O oo O O O O 00 O O O t~ •p i. oo ~ O M O O t~ O h O O ~O O O O O ~O O O O ~--i q ~ M M 0 "'~ C ~ M 1 v '1 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .--~ M ~ ~ 7 M N = O .--. ~ 0 Lzl N ..i O ~ 'C 'C C y ~ ~ i [~ ~ O ~--i ~ [~ N O M v~ a, 00 O O O O N .-, O ~--i t~ C ~ 10 M O O 01 •--~ ~ O In ~ v'~ N O O O O M M O M O •L ~ ;fl N ~t O t~ a1 B O O r M •--~ 00 O O O O M 01 ~ ~ N C ~O a1 1n O 01 10 1D o0 ~ I~ O •--~ ~ 00 ~•-i a C y 01 N N OO 00 O h OO N O N N ct ~O N ~ ~ Q• 10 V1 N M h ~ 1n l0 O M N 00 O In ~ N .••a vl ~O 7 C ~ 'e!' 00 O 6~ O y ~ L u a° B O O ~ O O O O O O O~ O O O O [~ 0 0 O of ~ o00 0 0 0 0 0 0 00~000o r o O 0 0: ~ 7 ~D ~n o0 01 .--~ ~ M O ~ O O a\ O O ~ [~ ~ O ~ M pp ~ ~ ,--i 7 M ~ 01 [~ l~ O vl O O •--~ ~ h im M ~ O~ ~O l~ ~ 01 N O ~O O O O ~ o o ~ ~ V ) ~C O ~ O a1 01 a\ ~ ~ N ~ ~ O O N o0 V1 N •--~ ~ et •--~ M ~O oo l~ oo r 00 .--~ oo O •--~ ~ O r ~ ~ .-r M D\ •--~ N N ~ 00 l ^ N v'~ ~ •--~ 01 M vl d' O 10 N N In ~-•i N 01 M M ~ M .~ ~O ~O M ti CO CR L ~+ O O ~ 7 ~ F y ^C O, ~ ~ R N O ~ G ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ A ~ x ~ E ~ ~ ~ ~. L ~ ~ ~ 4-i ~ 0 V cC L ~ 0 O b O ~ a C E O '~' C ~~ ~ L,yyi ~ W a ~ a~i ai"i L ~ ~ O ~ > ~ ~ ~ /M~ ~ A ~ ~ w ~ ~ 0 G ~ ~ b ~ W Y Ofi ~ ee a"i ~ N ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p W "d >, ,ca C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W a ~ .> ~ •~ U a~ > ~ y ~ ~ Q, Z b b F ° o a~U o aUwU o WC ~~H~U~ o ~ ~ o .~ . 'b ~ N M N M v'i N M I ~O [~ 00 N a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O w ~~~ o 0 0 ~~rr o00oao00000000 a, a, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N-a o M A ~ ° a e d0 o°'o °' ~ e f1, Q L y '~ '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U R ~ L C~ RS .~ .~ a~ 0 0 a w O C O U ~¢ M O O N w ,-- h D C ~ ~--i ~ O N a C~ O r~+ 'LS v ~ d a ^C W C 'U ~ o a~ p, ~ ~ O +.+ W ~ `"'" o O C .~ ~ o ~ ~ "y A y i. ~ ~" >> y C y a en 'O a G4 i O as C7 0 0 Q '~. ~I N=f N M O~ ~--~ V1 ~ O l~ ~ N [~ l~ O M l~ ~O l~ 'ct' °~ O N ~--~ ~--~ ~ ~ ~ M °~ ~O ~ tt Q~ ~ O O O~ O M ~ ~n N ~--~ l~ l~ N ~ 00 O~ 00 -• aD ao ~ O °~ N N O_ M N d' ~ ~ °~ ~D ~t Do O M Do M ~--~ O O O M O~ N ~ N N O ~ O~ 00 ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ 00 N N N V1 O~ ~O a0 ~ DD O~ O~ M ~D V'1 m N Ct O~ N ~ O ~n C' ~O ~O ~ ~n v~ ~D ~° vi vl ~° ~n vl t~ ~ ~ ~--~ DD ~ ~ v'~ l~ M ~ ~° •--+ ~O ~ N ~O vl ~O N v1 ~ ~ N ~ a0 O Do N N M °~ N °~ O ~ O ~ ~ O N ~ DD M O ~ 00 N ~ ~O ~--~ ^+ ~--~ °~ N ao ~O DD ~ DD '-+ ~--~ [~ O Do M l~ M N 00 N DO ~ O~ O 00 N U1 O N ~O t~ ~!1 M ~O O ~ l~ O ~n ~n ~O l~ ~O ~D O O~ O l~ -r ~ N M ~ [~ N °~ V1 O ~ O~ O ~--~ [~ ~--~ N ~ O O °~ O N ~ DD [ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M ~n vi N vi N O ~D O ~ vi c+i °~ oo a0 ao °~ O ao °~ N O C~ oo ~t ~O l~ ~ °~ l~ N vi oo [~ l~ C~ ~ ~O °~ ~--~ ~--~ N ~° ~ 00 N l~ ~ ~O M N O ~ M N M N 00 ..-. ~ ~ ^" N ~ O ~ ~ ~ N N v1 vl ~O ~n ~--+ N ~ O ~ ° ~ M v'~ ~t --+ N N ~--~ ~--~ N ~--~ ~t ~O ~--~ ~ N ~n ~--~ N M N O ~ vi N N .-~ .-. .--~ ,--~ ,--~ .--~ -~ ~ N N "' O vl M 00 (~ ~O °~ 00 M ti' M O\ °\ \O 00 M N O N 00 00 l~ a0 O vl O ~ ~ DD Ct N ~ l~ ~ _ _ N 00 ~O N a0 00 N O ~O N ~O l~ l~ N N O~ °~ N ~ ~ ~O M l~ ~ M O O l~ N O Vl ~D M ~° °~ O Q~ N DD ~ a0 ~ ~ N ~ O ~ V ~ O O DD [~ ~--~ N ~ ~--~ O~ t~ °~ N O DD N ~ N N vi ~ N ~ [~ ~ M Oi ~n ~ ~O ~n ~O ~O O ~D O ~O N ~ O ao ~ O v'i N ~D ~ l~ ~O ~n M l~ ~ vi O 00 ~}' ~}' er 00 \O l~ M --~ M 00 00 ~O l~ N ~ ~ N M N 00 M O O l~ O\ M ~ ~ °1 a0 d' O~ V1 .-~ v'~ N N [ ~ ~n oo v'~ ~--+ ~D N M ~ ~--~ ~--~ N o0 O~ ~/1 ~--~ N ~O O~ ^~ O O l ~ N M M ~--~ ~--~ ~--~ N ^~ N ~--~ N ~O ~ d' M [~ l~ d' 0~0 ~ O ~ dam' Obi ~ ~ N N ~ l~ Vl M ~--~ ~O M M O a0 ~ R Q~ ~° l~ M ~ ~ ~ ct ~ ~ ~ 00 ~O ~O l~ r• N O O~ ~--~ O M O [~ ~° 00 l~ °~ ~--~ t~ V1 O O~ 00 l~ ~D [~ ~ [~ M ~ M 00 ~° ~O N ~O ~--~ N DD DD ~ ~ O ~ ~ r M O O M vt ~ ~ M ~O ~--~ [~ O~ O 00 vi 00 M [~ l~ ~O ~!1 M ~O V7 vi ~ ~ N N N N O ~--~ M N C~ °~ ~--~ ^' M °1 00 00 .~ ~ O ~ V") O M N ~--~ ~--~ r. .-" M M M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~--~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O ~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~n o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O_ O O vi yi vi O O H 01 ~O 000 ~ ~ ~ ~ ry ~ 000 O, ~ ~ ~ ~p ~ ~ M N N M O ri N ~O vi M ~-+ ~--~ N Vl N ° " 3 ~' rn O yN, ~ F" U c~ ~ °O k, N bA X ~ U ~ ~ X ~ u7 '"a ~ H n" ~ Lir b x a~o;~aa,°U~w~H~xHO~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 00 ~ o ~o M o v, o 0 0 .-~ oo a, ~o O O O O ~ O~ O N O ~O O [~ 0 0 ~~ O ~n O oo ~ o o~ o o ~o 0 0 o v oo ~t ~o vi O O V ~n N O ~--~ ~ O DD O N v1 [~ M~ ~--~ ~ [~ N v'~ a0 O~ N O~ v1 O v~ V ~ N ~n ^+ ~ [~ M A N --~ ~O ~ ~n O M M M O N ^~ N ~t •--~ M N ~ ~--~ ~ a~i 0 o y v~ U 'b U v~ ~ Q N v7 ~ ~ ~ `a U • ~ ° y Q OA ,-~ N ~ as w ~ ~ a~ ~ .~ ~ m v ~ v as v -_o •s..~ ~ u. ° ° ~ a~ on ,., ° ~ ~ ° ~ a°i a~i c`a ~ . ~ ~ ~ U ° w ~ w v y y ~ awUawn;u:UUa:~a:2v~3~3w~~H O ^~ N M~ O N M 7 v'~ ~° l~ 00 O~ O ~--~ N ~' l~ 00 O~ O N o0 O ~--~ ~O O ~ M O N ~O N M N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M M M~ ~' ~~ V1 ~ to ~p ~O l° I~ DD 00 ap °1 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n-~ N ~--' O a 6~ M ~ ~ y O ~ O ~ ~ ~ O + C ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ a Q ~ a ~~' 'C u R ~ Lam. R -~. ~ D C ~ ~ ~ O r N a ~ CC O •~ u ~ ~ ~ ~; .~ w ,x a ~o c ~ o ~ ~ a a ~ w w ~ o ~ o o o O ~.. U ~ ~ oL ~ ~ at w Q ~ O q ~+ y L ~ aRi LY, ~~ O ~ ~ ~ a '~ G '~ L 6~ O as C7 0 0 .~ • 0 7 ~ o ~ O z N w -- N N N N r M r 00 N 00 r M M 0 F c L V O ~ ~ Lr N O ~ ~ N ~ y O O N ~ ~ ~ ~ V N N a w w w O o O v ~ ~ r w v. w ,~- ACTION N0. ITEM NO. `" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 27, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: Report on Status of Redistricting Process COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Redistricting Committee has met, and with the assistance of Mr. Gary Coleman, has reviewed the software, the electronic data from the Census Bureau and how these will interact with the County's GIS system. It appears that the population in the County's election districts is fairly close to the numerical equality required under the law. Each election district should contain 17,156 persons. Each district's population, the number of persons above or below the ideal and the percentage of deviation is as follows: Catawba 16,489 -667 -3.89$ Windsor Hills 17,317 161 0.94 Cave Spring 17,300 144 0.840 Vinton 16,644 -512 -2.98 Hollins 18,028 872 5.080 U.S. Supreme Court decisions make it clear that an overall deviation of less than 10°s between the population of the largest district and the smallest district is de minimis and would not require governmental justification. The redistricting policies adopted by the Board of Supervisors on March 13, 2001 directed that "each district will have equal population based upon the 2000 Census, with no more than a plus/minus Sa deviation between districts." The Virginia General Assembly will re-convene on April 4, 2001 to redistrict itself. The committee will await final action by the General Assembly before completing the County redistricting. You will recall that the County had to amend its adopted redistricting plan in 1991 to accommodate changes in precincts and districts as a result of General Assembly action. We anticipate delivering one or more redistricting plans to the Board by late April or early May. Respectfully submitted, -~~2.. / K.. ~~k~.~.o Paul M. Mahoney "T- County Attorney 1 ,. Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Action G:\ATTORNEY\PMM\AGENDA\Redistreport.frm vote No Yes Abs Church Johnson McNamara Minnix Nickens N-y 2 ACTION NUMBER SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: Arnold Covey, Director Elmer C. Hodge Department of Community Development County Administrator ITEM NUMBER O- i AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 27, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: Work Session to Review Roanoke County's Street Light Policy. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: County staff has been requested to review the current policy regarding the installation of street lights in Roanoke County. At the work session, staff plans to review with the Board of Supervisors the history of the street light process, the current evaluation process, appeals process, various costs associated with street light installation and budget. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: At this time, staff is not recommending any changes to the current policy. If changes are requested, staff will submit them to the Board of Supervisors for approval, at a later date o-~ Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: VOTE Church Johnson McNamara Minnix Nickens No Yes Abs Q a~ 0 c ca O 4- ~) T' ~~ i ,~ +~ t __. ----- - --- V--- ~pe~~ ~w G V 0 C fG O DC 0 V •- O a s ._ _~ L ~.d i ilw a.+ iI~ '~'~ ~w sera .~.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ,~ ~~ O L W L 0 .~ a~ '~ C d7 a .~ (~ g ^ arr L ~` C A V a oE~~ ~7 .~ O U "~ ~. Q .~ .,.. s ~~ ~~ ~~ W ^ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ V ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ V ~ ~ ~ ~ •~ '(~ t~ t1~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ .~ ~- i~ ~, ..,. --- ~ i tV ~' ~ ~. '~ s ~ ~ ~ ~ V ~ ~ '"~ ~ ~ d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ _ .~" ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ,~ c~ ,~ ~ ~ "~' ~ ^ ~°° ~ ~ f i i®t ' ~ ~ ~ L U O L a v 0 a __, ~ ~ ._ o _ ~t 1-1J ~ f , L r l .Q ~~ ~ L '~ ~~o =~> ~~~ ~. a .~ ~„ 4..._ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ c~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ a~ r +s~ ^(;~„j> .~ .~.. ..^ ~ ^~ ~ raw qq ~~ tiV ~ ~ > ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ au U ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ .... ~ ~ ~ ~ L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ L ~ ~ ^/ ~f ~l i WIICI ~ ._ ~d ~.~~~ /~ ~ l V lirf ~8/ 7r. `.~.~ ~~~ ~~~ .a~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~Q~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ =~ ._ '~ ,uwa~ # ~:~ . L ~ "' ^.. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ,~ ^ : ® ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i.. .V ~ ~ .~.~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ °.... i.. ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0~ ~ ~ a ~ s ~ cu ~ ~ ~~ , ~ t ~ ~ ~ r~ . ~ ~~ / ~i rrNN Yl ~~ iw _~ ~Y/ i~ ~r w ~~ sw ^~ O V '~ ~ ~ r w YJ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ /+ ~ rii/ r/~ ~/ j ~ ~ ~ i ~er~ ~ M/ ~ ~ ~ o ~el~1~o ^ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ iii 'b l ~ ~ ir/ !off F ~ ~ w ~ ~ / i ~ ~ ~ i ~ L ~I. O ~ r W L ._ _~ ~. e . _ a - ~ ... a _ _ _ _ ..___ ;_ ~a: ~~e_ .a ...m ~,. j ~l~ .. .~ .. . . ~ a .. .. . . ,_~~ o .,~ __ _ _ _ .__ ~ _ I I e I ~ . ~ .. t' ~~ 7~- l } i i ~, ~ ~~ f ~e ~ j~ i 3 3i~ ~' .. ~ y ~ ~ ~7~ ~ R ~ ~~ q , ~ M ~ ' t ~ r 777 ! ~ ~ ~i~~ ~ . ; } }~1 ~~i a . ~ ~i i _ ~? ~ ,~ e ~ l~ ~~~1 ~ ~ ` ~~ ~ i I ~(~ i C' z~ • i ~~~~ 4~ ~;33 j g - a s ~ i 1 "' _ - ___ ____ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ ___. _ _ _ . _ _.- _ _ _ _. _._ 1 .__ _._. __ ___.. - 7 S ~ ~ ,: ~ ~ c x o - ~ r j! r ... ~ _.._. _... _ .... s Y.. _.._ _ .. _...____ ____ . ... ._ ~, a o~. o F ~ t J a W L L a ^] W S L y v Z 2 ~ W W W F = 2 W O F~F ~• ^~. L 0 0 ,~ ~- V .~' ~ _ ~ O ~~ N vIM ioi,~ •- W ~ ~ ~~ ~ ' a~ o = F- o .:? . ~-t_ ~.^/ /~ .... w~ass iesae ^ sre Nl ~1 s ^ ca H~ 1~ ~~ a'd ~~ ~~ i IIIrO ^ ~ pp# ~ ^ ®ia~ ~~ Yl ^ i99~ i iPS1iA ^ r~ /~ /~ W V .~ ..~ i 8Y! z W W F- t/~ W ~ a O ~ ~ o Z V O oc '~ ~ o ° a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J a ,~ z > p o N W ~ ~ ~ ~ U Z ~ ~ ~ DC I- O ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ;~ ~~ :. :r.- 1.}.. • ~ ..J ~~ ~~ ~ fl ~ ~ ~_ ~ ~ ~ s~. ~d/ ua ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ,~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ •~ ~~ .~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ (~ ~ C°el © ~ C!) C1C Q ~1 ~.,~ ~ W p s ~ ~ ~- ~ . ~ ~- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ 1 i i ~ , ~~ ~•, ~ i. ~'~ ''f ~ ~ ~ ~. ~' ~ ~ +' •pr!~ l ®: 8 ~~ L~ Si a~,°- ~~ -~ ~ ~~ ~~y, ~ o! ~. _ _ w`O,fA T t..'~\Xf i 009 -i\~ •:~ ~; A M a ~ s ti €, ^~ _~ {~ L.. • ~_ 1JJ ~g~ W Z3 ~ ~ ~~yy ~.J ~.}~ ~i- Q e~ p~ 1 N 3.~6 ~~ Q ~ W ±_e ~~ ~r UJ •~ T L.~ i4f ~dr~ • ~ L.d l . ~ ~ C.) ~ ~ ~ ~- C) c -~ . ,, : ~~,, ~ '~ i ~ ~ , c, w' ; ]', i' ~ ~~ U+' i ' i [ ; ', ~ ~ ~ ~i xi ~; ~ ._ , $ ~r i ~ ~ ~ ~i ~ ~ N~ H l W ~i N~ ~ IQ ~ ~r N ' ~' i ~--; - °; ~ ~; b ' U~ ~ i ; '+I Y _ rr ~ y ! .: Y~i ~~ d ~'i _~ ~, a w!d ~ ~1 > M• 01 H i' n~ i ~ ag. a LL `. ~ of .+ z O '~ ^ _~ H~ ~ ~~ ~i u _ h. ~ ~i 1 2' z~ . _.. n ~, r <r~ ^ ^ ^ ^I~ ~ 11~~ ~~ _~ W l~_ T •~ a ~~ ~~ j'~ o `~ (U ~ ~~ •~ ~ V' ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4.JJ $°d Y3~~ ~~^'+~ • ~ "~..C 5.~. .~ ~~ M x b ~ ~' p (ry~~`I~,]~ ~^' 4.../ /~ T" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C} (U ~~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ® ~ . -~-~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ '~'. /~'1 I 1 , V ~ ~ tii.J i +w~.w __. •-t_- ~; ~~ ;_ r~Mf~ V ~ ti N~ ,I ~ 9 ~+ , ~ ~' z Y -+ __~ ~1 `I ~r ~~iti~ --; o ~; --- g ~; R i ~i ~ ~i -' s ~ ~ y: ~~i^1 ®~ ti 1 ® U ~ Q .~ ~ ~../ O ua j, , ~ (~ ~ L .~ ~ ~ ~ •j Q (11 ~~qr ~~/ ~ V .~~~.dqqr ~~~{{ •V 1L .~.~ .~ ~ U ~ {'6 _~ ~- (~ ~ ~ _I -i~--r .~^ W r ~v (~ '~ L- a ^ ~_ s~"+ ~ ~ ~ ~ „~ •~' ° ~ ~~ ~, ~ ~~a~ ~~rr ~ ~ ~ ~ls ~ ~ ~ ~ .... ~ ~ .~-., ~ ~ i ~ ~' ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ r -•~ -i--r ~~, Q,) ~ r"i O ~ N tJ') C~ ~ s ~/~ N ® !~ .., ` V , + i ~ ~ 1i ~ ~ . ~ ~~ ~ 0 ~ ~ a C'`~! ~- ~ 1 e---i ~ . x ~ e b i i_. .. c- [~' d'; ~ ~ ji f ``~ ~P'~ ie f `~ ~ _. .~ ` i a ry'~ ~ ~i H ~~ ~' ~ ~~ i ~ ® I a I ®...-.-.-.1 ~Q G NQQ d O ~ x x ~ ~ ~ ~~ Qom} ~ _ ~' ~; ~ ~ ~ (. ~ ® tv U ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ..:~ i ~' E ~ ,$. _ ~; ~ U ~ ~~ :j W ~I \V Q w /t+~ ...~. ~ l~(. ~ ( ~ ~ ~ ~i N ~ ~ t V 3~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~. ~ . _ ~ . ~ ro' o ~ t!! N ~ i .+ . ~ ~ ~Yy F~~ ~ ~ i ~V _ rli y X //'9 V l p~~~V ~° 1~~ ~ 4 ~ ~ . ~ i =~( z ,, .. . _. _ _. __ _ ._ , ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ V tll ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L ~ ~`' ~ (~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~... ~ E ~ p~~ a a~ ' ~ ! ,~ ~,^~ ~ -~ ~ ----- ---- - -~- - ~ - ----- 'l d ~ ,,. t. ~~ ~ i. C. ~ ~ j ]} . ~~ ~ ~ j. raj ~ ~ C-'.-9 ~ ~ ~ , . . ~ ~ ~ i ~~ ~; ~. . i d. ~ ~1 I ~ f. ~ o i _.~ y ~ ~ xi . _; ~ M u ~ I ' ~ ~ f ° Y ~ ~ I ~~~ i ~ ~ W FII q ' {~ i 1 '~ ~ ;. ~ .. I 'O ~+ ~ `I! > Q ~.I • I ~~ I ` ~ ¢§,' ~ ~~ ~' Q ~ ~ _r', ~ ~~ . I , ; .~ ~i i ~ ~j I 4'~ ~ i ~. I f Q' H ;m. . ~ ~~~ "~ I '$ ~' 0 ~ ~~ ~ x~ ~ ~ ~ ~' Q ~ ~j ~ ~I W ~ N~ ~` `~ ®i __. z~ Inl w ~ .... _ _ . _. _ . . - ---.. - _-- __ -__ . -_-_:. _ .._. ~~ i.f') ~ ~ o U ~ . ~ ~ • ~ ,~ Ca ~ ~ ~ Q -~ ~ "" ~ ' ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ll ~ C? ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~S ~ ~ -~ ~ . O ~ t~ ~ ,s ~ Cll {ll ~ ~ ~ ~ 7~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ O ~ ~ - ~ Q,D S~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Cll ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . i ~ . ~.. ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ --- ~~ ~' ~ ~ c~ ~~? , a~ ~-y f s ~ ~ •~ ~ 1 V ~r.~ r, ~ ImoTwo ~r ~s ~3 ~CC .Q C Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ tll ~~ ~ .~..a ti) ~_ ~ .L ~ ~ ~ -~-a ~ ~ ~ ~ sd., C(3 d ~ C!9 -~...~ tQ V ~ ~ ~ ~ Ca a(1~ d~l9 ~ L, pq~ -4~-a ~3,s •~ i i ~. --+=~- '~i L!"? ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4- 4- ~"'~~ m ~ y ~../ • ® ~., ~ ~ (~ ~ ~ ~ tj'? ~ -~ ~ ~_ t1') ~ ~ ~ ® '~ ~ (~ Z..,~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ " ~ •~ ~ ~ "' 1,... -, 1 `V ~ ~ ~ Y __ ~ i"""~ ~. "" +,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~g ~q t1„! ~,. +~~ ~° _~ Q _~ ~ _ U ~ ~ ~ a ~ U ([S O ~ ~ J U ~~' Q U ~ V ~ ~= ~ ~ ~ _ ® ~ ~ (ll ~ tU ~ ,~ ~ ~ tt3 ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ "~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ .,J ~ C6 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ •~ ''+ _ I ~ ~ j 3= ii , ~ -F~-+ i.L~A l ~~ ~-r-- --- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4-. i""~ m ~ ~...i ~ ~- ~ ~ Ld'3 ~ ~' ~ . ~ ~ '~ ~ ~"' ~'L f`~3 ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~,.,. _ r ~ ~ .. .~ ~~ ~ ~ U ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ..r ~ ~ Q~ a~-+ ~ ~ s.._ ~ .a-, -~ o ~ s._, ~ ~ Q !~_ T Cf3 ~ -~-J ~ ~ •~ ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~3 -~-+ f43 Q1 ~' fl ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ ila ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ .~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~-+ ~ ~ '~ ~~_ ~ ~ l~ ® ~ ~°°I • i"r a..s r°~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ® `--' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ J ~ ~ __._ fL3 ~ ~ Q ~ ~ Q~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ -#--~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ . CY_ ~°- {.) [~ 1.~ J cW G Z ..~ .`,~" ~_ ~ .~ ~ ,Q} Q1 ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ U c~ ~ _~ ~ ~N ~ ~ ® ~ ~ -~ cU ~ .~.i -~ ~ Q~ ~ ~S ~ ~ ~ © ~ ~ ~ ~ V .~ L °~ (~3 .~ tU O U ,~ CL9 -~ -~ ~'1 Q} ~ r-i N ~ ~ (~'~ ~/ ~ ~"~ 4... ~ N r ® Q O ~°. t~ rl 0 d° O~ ~ ~° ~ ~ M O O t"~.l ~ i . s. a [~ 7~ l /~ Iii/ ~~ i~ ~` f ~ ~5 ~ ~ ~ p ~ U ~~ Z3 ~a- ~~ ~ ~ ~.-=- ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ (ll ~-' ~ ~ t~ ~ ~ Q ~„"" ~}^ ~ V ~L ~ rL'iy 5~,. _~ d ~PSSL 'a W~ ~.. ,~ •~ ~.~. . ~, ~ W ~~ ~~~p11~ G i ~~~_~. \ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,•-., ~ ~.? ~ ~ ~ C3 ~ ~ i ~ i y~ i /La"4 T""6~ ~ Y t f 4,w ;~ ' ~ ~ t V ' ~p q ~a ! 1 ` -~ S ~ ~ ' 1 ~ ~ I it0 s ~ j I ^s ~ ~ ~'~ U Cll -}-+ t'Q .Q ~ o L ~ ~ ~ (C6 ~ ~_ ~ ~U ~ .~ O ~ .~ ~~ ~~ s... ~ ~..-~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _... .~. ~® U Q ~ ~~ a .~ ~~ ~ ~' ~~ ~~ ~... ~-1--+/ ~.f') ~ ~ ~ .I..i t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~,~^~, _~ .'~ Ld"} (~ , ~ ~ ~ 1... ~ ~,, ~ ~ -1-~ I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~. c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; 1.l I 1 ~ ' ' ' + 1 {{ 1 ~~ f !! -_ ff t ~/ ~ ~~ L.~. r'`~,, y -~-+ ~ ~ -r-~ {.) ~_ ~ ~" ~ ~ .~ ,~ ~ ,~ ^ ^ ~ '~ ~~ f~ ~ .~ t~ s`. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~.~. ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ..... c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~v e i ~ ~, s ~ r T"~ /"'\ Q 'a,,../ ~ ~ _ O P ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~" I ~ ~ i I ~ ' '~'~"~ -- - - I .~ L L .~ O Q3 .~.+ M ~! (~ .Q ~ Q ~.. ~ f2.. O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ Q3 ~ ~_ sr ~ ~ Z3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ X37 4~S _O ~ C~ ~" (.) -~ ~ ~ ~ ~_ Q tll _® ~ Cll ~, ~ S~ Z5 ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~~ '~1/ ~'°~ .~I +..+ °~1.~ ® l,f ~ ® r-'( c"~.-.. ,~-~., CLl f"'~1 ~...~" 0 ' ~L. f ~ s" ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ . ~~ ~ ~ ~ V C3~ tC3 o t~ . ~ - - ~ ~ ` ~ ' ~ 4 3 ~ ~ C'CS ~ o ~ ~ ~ o ~ ,~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ f N ~ ~ I v j I I 3 +l..f~ 1 ` i ~ ~ ' ~ ~~-•--1- \T" S -____ ___-_.- -_ _ .--~-. - - __-. j~ I~ ~~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ t!) ~ ~ (~ ~„ ~ , ~ ~_~ ~ a ~ ~_ CL1 ~ ~ fl ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -~ ~ ~ ~. • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~_~~ ~ ~~ ~~~~~~ ~ ~ V ~ ~ ~ ® ~ ~ ~ ~ e- ~ C~ ~~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~. ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ .~.~ . ~ s- ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~-= ~ ' ~ i `ice ~ ~ ~ d ~~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, I ~ - - - ~ ..,,, C O 'i a 0 V s ._ L •1•~ a~ c~ ~ m o~ .~ ...~, A M ~~ M I `~ • ~~yn ~+~J ~i .~ `~ ~J~J •~ `~ ~M TT~~ VL Q !~ 0 0 0 0 N !~ !"") !'~ s~sanba~ ~o .~aqu~n~ m ... ^~ r~r ~.rJ L .~. _ ~ N ~ M1 'Ct' M GU ~ C~ 40 C,r CTS ~ M ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ •. Ol ~ Cr G~ C3~ tT -~- -~- -ter- -{~- -ff?- -~- 4~ ~'1 m ~ . •i-~ V tU ~ ~ ® O ~ Q • ... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O Q ~ t.t) t,r~ ~ C7 t~ Ca ~ ~ ~ C7"~ t~ Q> ~ ~'f ~ I''~ +OC! ~ t~- '~ ~ ~ C~ t3'~ ~ ~' ~I ~ ~ 1 r~ ~ t'~ ~. ~/1 bA . ~, 4~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ t1'~ t'il ~ N ~ 1.[ ) OQ Cr ~ ~ rt ilk ~"~ ~ ~ r°! s-d ~ i ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 .~ i.. ~ ~ L ~ fir., ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ad t Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _____ ~ _ i ,~,, ~ ~ ~ j E C~ ~ ~ ~ ® ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ^~ ~~ "~' -i-, .~ ~.. s ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER V~ ~... AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 13, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: Update on WEB Site Redesign and e-Government Initiative COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: In the late 1990's Roanoke County brought its Internet site on line. With the help of WEB Masters in each department, we have been able to maintain the WEB site with minimal cost. Most of the data on our site is of an informational nature, with some e- government functions provided in different places on the site. The March edition of Government Technology quoted a recent study by the National Information Consortium that 65% of adults on line have executed at least one e- government transaction, and that by 2002 more than one-third of the population will use the Internet as their primary source for accessing government services. In order to position the County to provide our citizens with these capabilities Mr. Hodge supported the need to redesign the County WEB site. Our goal is to make the site easier to navigate, provide a better look and feel, and most of all provide our citizens with 24hours/7days access to the information and services they want and need. Since early February the Information Technology Department has been working on a WEB site and e-government needs assessment. On March 9th the Information Technology Team and the County Administrator saw a PowerPoint presentation outlining the findings to date, the concept plan for future site development, and a timeline for implementation. In order to bring the Board of Supervisors up to date on this project, we would like to provide highlights from that presentation. a- ~, SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This presentation will provide the Board with information on the direction and timeline associated with the County WEB site redesign and e-government initiatives. We will provide a brief over view of the following topics: • Samples of other locality WEB sites. • Activity statistics on our current site. • Concept plan for our WEB site development. • Highlight some of the current e-government initiatives. • Outline of plan for providing additional e-government services. Respectfully Submitted by Elaine Carver, Director Information Technology Approved by: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE No. Yes Abs Approved () Motion by: Church Denied () Johnson Received () McNamara Referred () Minnix To () Nickens cc: File ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 27, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: Work Session on FY 2001-2002 Budget Development. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This time has been set aside for a budget work session related to development of the FY 2001-2002 budget. This work session will focus on obtaining Board consensus on the significant items and issues discussed at prior meetings. Additional information on these topics will be provided at the work session. Respectfully submitted, Brent Robertson Budget Director ACTION Approved () Motion by: Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To () Approved by, ~- ~~~ f Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator VOTE No Yes Abs Church _ _ _ Johnson _ _ _ McNamara _ _ Minnix _ _ _ Nickens AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY MARCH 27, 2001 RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE CLOSED MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened a closed meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such closed meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the closed meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the closed meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. - ~-l AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 27, 2001 RESOLUTION 032701-10 OF APPRECIATION TO THE ROANOKE MOOSE LODGE #284 FOR DONATIONS MADE IN SUPPORT OF ROANOKE COUNTY AND THE CATAWBA COMMUNITY WHEREAS, the Roanoke Moose Lodge #284 has provided a variety of benefits to the people of Roanoke County, and in particular to the residents of the Catawba Valley; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke Moose Lodge #284 recently donated a four wheel ATV, with trailer, which has already been used in three rescues, and helmets to the Mason Cove Rescue and Fire Department; sponsored the Winterfest Event in February 2001 for members and families of Mason Cove, Mt. Pleasant and Hollins Fire and Rescue Departments; and hosted a dinner and open house in October 2000 for Roanoke County and City of Salem Police Departments and Mason Cove Fire and Rescue Department; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke Moose Lodge #284 during the period of 1995 to 2000 made the following donations to benefit the citizens of Roanoke County: two canines; Total Mapping Station with lap top computer and software; contributions to DARE; incident team training for one police office and one psychologist; Goretex suits for the SWAT Team; night vision equipment; and cameras for domestic violence cases; and WHEREAS, through these donations and activities, the Roanoke Moose Lodge has demonstrated its generosity and community service orientation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, on its own behalf and on behalf of the citizens of Roanoke County, does hereby extend its sincere gratitude and appreciation to the ROANOKE MOOSE LODGE #284 and its membership, for their generosity and community service to the citizens of 1 Roanoke County and the Catawba Valley. On motion of Supervisor Church to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Resolutions of Appreciation File 2 c .. ' ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~ ""~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 27, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution of appreciation to the Roanoke Moose Lodge #284 for donations made in support of Roanoke County and the Catawba Community COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION At Supervisor Church's request, the County would like to recognize the Roanoke Moose Lodge #284 for its many contributions that benefit the citizens of Roanoke County. Among the recent donations was an ATV vehicle with trailer that has been used successfully in three recent rescues. They have also made many other donations since 1995 that are highlighted in the attached resolution. The Moose Lodge is to be commended for its community service and generosity. Mr. Kenneth Robinette, Governor of Roanoke Moose Lodge #284, and Mr. J. C. Morris, Administrator, plan to attend the meeting to accept the resolution. ~~ /~~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved () Motion by: Church _ _ _ Denied () Johnson Received () McNamara- _ _ Referred () Minnix _ To () Nickens _ ~- I ~F - _.~ R-I AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 27, 2001 RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION TO THE ROANOKE MOOSE LODGE #284 FOR DONATIONS MADE IN SUPPORT OF ROANOKE COUNTY AND THE CATAWBA COMMUNITY WHEREAS, the Roanoke Moose Lodge #284 has provided a variety of benefits to the people of Roanoke County, and in particular to the residents of the Catawba Valley; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke Moose Lodge #284 recently donated a four wheel ATV, with trailer, which has already been used in three rescues, and helmets to the Mason Cove Rescue and Fire Department; sponsored the Winterfest Event in February 2001 for members and families of Mason Cove, Mt. Pleasant and Hollins Fire and Rescue Departments; and hosted a dinner and open house in October 2000 for Roanoke County and City of Salem Police Departments and Mason Cove Fire and Rescue Department; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke Moose Lodge #284 during the period of 1995 to 2000 made the following donations to benefit the citizens of Roanoke County: two canines; Total Mapping Station with lap top computer and software; contributions to DARE; incident team training for one police office and one psychologist; Goretex suits for the SWAT Team; night vision equipment; and cameras for domestic violence cases; and WHEREAS, through these donations and activities, the Roanoke Moose Lodge has demonstrated its generosity and community service orientation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, on its own behalf and on behalf of the citizens of Roanoke County, does hereby extend its sincere gratitude and appreciation to the ROANOKE MOOSE LODGE #284 and its membership, for their generosity and community service to the citizens of Roanoke County and the Catawba Valley. .. ~-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 27, 2001 RESOLUTION 032701-11 OF CONGRATULATIONS TO GEORGE THOMAS "TOMMY" MORGAN FOR AN OUTSTANDING FOOTBALL SEASON AND BEING NAMED TO ALL-STATE FIRST TEAMS, GROUP AA, AND DEFENSIVE PLAYER OF THE YEAR WHEREAS, team sports are an important part of the curriculum at schools in Roanoke County, teaching cooperation, sportsmanship and athletic skill; and WHEREAS, George Thomas "Tommy" Morgan, a senior at Northside High School, had an outstanding season on the football team, resulting in the 2000 Vikings becoming the Blue Ridge District Champions with a record of 10 wins and 2 losses; and WHEREAS, Tommy served as Team Captain and demonstrated his outstanding athletic ability and good sportsmanship throughout the season; and WHEREAS, Tommy received the following honors during the 2000 season: ^ First Team -All-Blue Ridge District ^ District Defensive Player of the Year ^ First Team -All-Region III and Defensive Player of the Year ^ First Team - V.H.S.C.A. All-State ^ Group AA Defensive Player of the Year ^ First Team -Associated Press All-State ^ First Team -All Timesland -Defensive Player of the Year NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia does hereby extend its sincere congratulations to GEORGE THOMAS "TOMMY" MORGAN for his outstanding football season and being named Group AA 1 Defensive Player of the Year. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors extends its best wishes to Tommy Morgan for continued success in all of his future endeavors. On motion of Supervisor to Johnson adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~• Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Resolutions of Appreciation File Dr. Linda Weber 2 l~ _~ R-a, AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 27, 2001 RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS TO GEORGE THOMAS "TOMMY" MORGAN FOR AN OUTSTANDING FOOTBALL SEASON AND BEING NAMED TO ALL-STATE FIRST TEAMS, GROUP AA, AND DEFENSIVE PLAYER OF THE YEAR WHEREAS, team sports are an important part of the curriculum at schools in Roanoke County, teaching cooperation, sportsmanship and athletic skill; and WHEREAS, George Thomas "Tommy" Morgan, a senior at Northside High School, had an outstanding season on the football team, resulting in the 2000 Vikings becoming the Blue Ridge District Champions with a record of 10 wins and 2 losses; and WHEREAS, Tommy served as Team Captain and demonstrated his outstanding athletic ability and good sportsmanship throughout the season; and WHEREAS, Tommy received the following honors during the 2000 season: ^ First Team -All-Blue Ridge District ^ District Defensive Player of the Year ^ First Team -All-Region III and Defensive Player of the Year ^ First Team - V.H.S.C.A. All-State ^ Group AA Defensive Player of the Year ^ First Team -Associated Press All-State ^ First Team -All Timesland -Defensive Player of the Year NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia does hereby extend its sincere congratulations to GEORGE THOMAS "TOMMY" MORGAN for his outstanding football season and being named Group AA 1 .~ Ra Defensive Player of the Year. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors extends its best wishes to Tommy Morgan for continued success in all of his future endeavors. ~3 _. ,. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 27, 2001 RESOLUTION 032701-12 OF CONGRATULATIONS TO THE CAVE SPRING HIGH SCHOOL BOYS SWIM TEAM FOR WINNING THE GROUP AAA STATE CHAMPIONSHIP FOR THE SECOND CONSECUTIVE YEAR WHEREAS, team sports are an important part of the curriculum at schools in Roanoke County, teaching cooperation, sportsmanship and athletic skill; and WHEREAS, the Cave Spring High School Boys Swim Team won the Group AAA State Championship on February 17, 2001, at George Mason University, edging past Menchville High School of Newport News with the score of 179 and 1/2 to 170; and WHEREAS, the Knights set six school records, three Roanoke Valley District records, one Northwest Regional record, and won their second consecutive state swimming championship with a tremendous team effort guided by first year coach Shannon Summerlin; and WHEREAS, Tommy Rappold led the team with a second place finish in the 100-yard butterfly and fourth in the 100 backstroke; Andy Bauman was third in the 200-yard individual medley and fifth in the 100 backstroke; the 200-yard medley relay team of Rappold, Bauman, Brett Fonder and Mark Bauman finished second; and the 400 freestyle relay of Rappold, Fonder, Andy Bauman and Kevin Boucher was third; and WHEREAS, team members Tommy Rappold, Andy Bauman, Mark Bauman, Brett Fonder, and Kevin Boucher achieved All America consideration qualifying standards. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia does hereby extend its sincere congratulations to the members of the 1 .~ CAVE SPRING HIGH SCHOOL BOYS SWIM TEAM, Ryan Adams; Scott Adams; Chris Adkins; Andy Bauman; Mark Bauman; Ryan Blackwell; Kevin Boucher; Pierre Boucher; Jake Bova; Daniel Eggleston; Brett Fonder; Court Freedman; Josh Hailey; David Harbourt; Scott Johnson; Jason Nanz; Tommy Rappold; Leo Straub; Josh Shepherd; and Trey Watkins; for their athletic ability, their team spirit, and their commitment to each other; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, thatthe Board of Supervisors extends its best wishes to the members of the team, Coach Summerlin, and the school in their future endeavors. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: .~ Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Resolutions of Appreciation File Dr. Linda Weber, School Superintendent 2 j(?- 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 27, 2001 RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS TO THE CAVE SPRING HIGH SCHOOL BOYS SWIM TEAM FOR WINNING THE GROUP AAA STATE CHAMPIONSHIP FOR THE SECOND CONSECUTIVE YEAR WHEREAS, team sports are an important part of the curriculum at schools in Roanoke County, teaching cooperation, sportsmanship and athletic skill; and WHEREAS, the Cave Spring High School Boys Swim Team won the Group AAA State Championship on February 17, 2001, at George Mason University, edging past Menchville High School of Newport News with the score of 179 and 1/2 to 170; and WHEREAS, the Knights set six school records, three Roanoke Valley District records, one Northwest Regional record, and won their second consecutive state swimming championship with a tremendous team effort guided by first year coach Shannon Summerlin; and WHEREAS, Tommy Rappold led the team with a second place finish in the 100-yard butterfly and fourth in the 100 backstroke; Andy Bauman was third in the 200-yard individual medley and fifth in the 100 backstroke; the 200-yard medley relay team of Rappold, Bauman, Brett Fonder and Mark Bauman finished second; and the 400 freestyle relay of Rappold, Fonder, Andy Bauman and Kevin Boucher was third; and WHEREAS, team members Tommy Rappold, Andy Bauman, Mark Bauman, Brett Fonder, and Kevin Boucher achieved All America consideration qualifying standards. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia does hereby extend its sincere congratulations to the members of the 1 .. ~~ CAVE SPRING HIGH SCHOOL BOYS SWIM TEAM, Ryan Adams; Scott Adams; Chris Adkins; Andy Bauman; Mark Bauman; Ryan Blackwell; Kevin Boucher; Pierre Boucher; Jake Bova; Daniel Eggleston; Brett Fonder; Court Freedman; Josh Hailey; David Harbourt; Scott Johnson; Jason Nanz; Tommy Rappold; Leo Straub; Josh Shepherd; and Trey Watkins; for their athletic ability, their team spirit, and their commitment to each other; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors extends its best wishes to the members of the team, Coach Summerlin, and the school in their future endeavors. 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~ ~'"' ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 27, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: Public Hearings for Citizen Comment on the following items: Real Estate, Machinery and Tools, and Personal Property Tax Rates "Effective" Real Estate Tax Rate Increase General Comment on the Upcoming Annual Budget for FY2001-2002 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: As requested at an earlier work session, staff advertised the proposed Real Estate, Personal Property, and Machinery and Tools Tax Rates for calendar year 2001 as follows: Real Estate Tax at a rate of not more than $1.13 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation. Personal Property Tax at a rate of not more than $3.50 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation. Machinery and Tools Tax at a rate of not more than $3.00 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation. In addition, state code mandates that when reassessment of real property in a locality results in a real estate revenue increase of 1 % over the previous year, the locality must either reduce the tax rate, so that the revenues are no more than 101 % of the previous year's or hold a public hearing indicating an "effective" real property tax increase. Also, consistent with past practices, the Board has expressed a desire to hold a public hearing to elicit "general" comment on the upcoming annual budget development process. This hearing gives citizens the opportunity to express their priorities and concerns for the Board to consider during formulation of the upcoming budget. r • ~ ~ "". The public hearings scheduled for today are for receiving written and oral comment on these three topics. The public hearing on proposed Tax Rates were advertised on March 13 and 20, 2001, the "Effective" Real Estate Tax Rate Increase was advertised on March 20, 2001, and the General Comment for the FY2001-2002 Budget was advertised on March 20, 2001, thereby satisfying state code requirements for public notice. Attached is a memo that highlights specific points of today's public hearings. Respectfully submitted, n:~.~~ ~ Brent Robertson Budget Director Approved by, Cf~? - ~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved () Motion by: No Yes Abs Denied O Church _ _ _ Received () Johnson _ _ _ Referred () McNamara _ _ _ To () Minnix _ _ _ Nickens S -1- 3 I N T E R -_ =_= MEMO O F F I C E To: Members, Board of Supervisors From: Brent Robertson, Budget Director Subject: Public Hearings on 3/27/01 Date: March 27, 2001 On March 27, 2001 the County will hold three public hearings related to the FY2001-02 budget. These hearings will allow citizens the opportunity to comment on various items that impact development of the upcoming budget--assessments, tax rates, funding priorities, increases in revenues, etc. Listed below are comments relating to the public hearing and/or to the composition of the advertisement that appeared in the newspaper: Tax Rates The tax rates were advertised at the County's current rates. The Board may not adopt tax rates above these advertised rates, (without re-advertisement and another public hearing), but could adopt tax rates less than the advertised rates. Adoption of the rates are scheduled for the April 10, 2001 meeting. "Effective" Real Estate Tax Rate Increase The content and composition of this ad is dictated by state code. This ad is confusing and may alarm some citizens who do not understand its intent. Identified increase in assessments for 2001 (over the previous year's assessments) averaged 3.79%. Increase assessments in 2000 (over 1999 assessment) averaged 3.19%. Total increase in the proposed FY01-02 budget over the FY00-O1 budget is 6.2%. Members, Board of Supervisors Page 2 March 27, 2001 General Comment--FY2001-2002 Budget This forum provides citizens with the opportunity to comment on maintaining, increasing, or decreasing funding for services and/or programs for the upcoming fiscal year. This hearing affords the citizen a proactive voice (what they would like to see) as opposed to a reactive voice (what the County Administrator/Board of Supervisors have proposed). AGENDA ITEM NO. " ~' APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING l7 SUBJECT: I` eG ORDINANCE I~'~ CITIZEN COMMENTS would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD- /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE G[//DEL/NES L/STED BELOW-- ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~P ~V /I~' -e f ~ ~L'' ' I'~, -~ d ~1 P_ -~-~ ~i ADDRESS: G1 3 3 ~=}~ n/ c. ~ G w I.~ r ~ ~ ~~~~-~ PHONE: S ~C% ~.3 G Z.' ~.~~~~~- .~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 27, 2001 RESOLUTION 032701-13 AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF NOT TO EXCEED $16,500,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION SCHOOL BONDS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA TO BE SOLD TO THE VIRGINIA PUBLIC SCHOOL AUTHORITY AND PROVIDING FOR THE FORM AND DETAILS THEREOF WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors (the "Board") of the County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "County") has determined that it is necessary and expedient to borrow $16,500,000 and to issue its general obligation school bonds to finance certain capital projects for school purposes. WHEREAS, the County has held a public hearing, after due publication of notice, in accordance with Section 15.2-2606, Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended ("Virginia Code") on March 27, 2001 on the issuance of school bonds in an amount not to exceed $16,500,000. WHEREAS, the School Board of the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("School Board") has requested by resolution the Board to authorize the issuance of the Bonds (as defined below) and has consented to the issuance of the Bonds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA: 1. Authorization of Bonds and Use of Proceeds. The Board hereby determines that it is advisable to contract a debt and to issue and sell general obligation school bonds of the County in the aggregate principal amount not to exceed $16,500,000 (the "Bonds") for the purpose of financing certain capital projects for school purposes. The Board hereby authorizes the issuance and sale of the Bonds in the form and upon the terms established pursuant to this Resolution. 2. Sale of the Bonds. It is determined to be in the best interest of the County to accept the offer of the Virginia Public School Authority (the "VPSA") to purchase from the County, and to sell to the VPSA, the Bonds at a price determined by the VPSA and accepted by the Chairman of the Board or the County Administrator, such price to be not less than 98% of par and not more than 103% of par (105% of par for bonds with a final maturity of 10 years or less), and upon the terms established pursuant to this Resolution. The County Administrator and the Chairman of the Board, or either of them, and such officer or officers of the County as either of them may designate, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into the Bond Sale Agreement dated as of April 2, 2001, with the VPSA providing for the sale of the Bonds to the VPSA in substantially the form on file with the County Administrator, which form is hereby approved ("Bond Sale Agreement"). 3. Details of the Bonds. The Bonds shall be issuable in fully registered form; shall be dated the date of issuance and delivery of the Bonds; shall be designated "General Obligation School Bonds, Series 2001 "; shall bear interest from the date of delivery thereof payable semi-annually on each January 15 and July 15 (each an "Interest Payment Date"), beginning January 15, 2002, at the rates established in accordance with paragraph 4 of this Resolution; and shall mature on July 15 in the years (each a "Principal Payment Date")and in the amounts established in accordance with paragraph 4 of this Resolution. The Interest Payment Dates and the Principal Payment Dates are subject to change at the request of VPSA. 4. Principal Installments and Interest Rates. The County Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to accept the interest rates on the Bonds established by the VPSA, provided that each interest rate shall be ten one-hundredths of one percent (0.10%) over the interest rate to be paid by the VPSA for the corresponding principal payment date of the bonds to be issued by the VPSA (the "VPSA Bonds"), a portion of the proceeds of which will be used to purchase the Bonds, and provided further, that the true interest cost of the Bonds does not exceed seven percent (7%) per annum. The County Administrator is further authorized and directed to accept the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds and the amounts of principal of the Bonds coming due on each Principal Payment Date ("Principal Installments") established by the VPSA, including any changes in the Interest Payment Dates, the Principal Payment Dates and the Principal Installments which may be requested by VPSA provided that such aggregate principal amount shall not exceed the maximum amount set forth in paragraph one and the final maturity of the Bonds shall not be later than 21 years from their date. The execution and delivery of the Bonds as described in paragraph 8 hereof shall conclusively evidence such Interest Payment Dates, Principal Payment Dates, interest rates, principal amount and Principal Installments as having been so accepted as authorized by this Resolution. 5. Form of the Bonds. The Bonds shall be initially in the form of one or more temporary typewritten bonds substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A. 6. Payment; Paying Agent and Bond Registrar. The following provisions shall apply to the Bonds: (a) For as long as the VPSA is the registered owner of the Bonds, all payments of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds shall be made in immediately available funds to the VPSA at or before 11:00 a.m. on the applicable Interest Payment Date, Principal Payment Date or date fixed for prepayment or redemption, or if such date is not a business day for Virginia banks or for the Commonwealth of Virginia, then at or before 11:00 a.m. on the business day next preceding such Interest Payment Date, Principal Payment Date or date fixed for prepayment or redemption; (b) All overdue payments of principal and, to the extent permitted by law, interest shall bear interest at the applicable interest rate or rates on the Bonds; and 2 (c) SunTrust Bank, Richmond, Virginia is designated as Bond Registrar and Paying Agent for the Bonds. 7. Prepayment or Redemption. The Principal Installments of the Bonds held by the VPSA coming due on or before July 15, 2011, and the definitive Bonds for which the Bonds held by the VPSA may be exchanged that mature on or before July 15, 2011 are not subject to prepayment or redemption prior to their stated maturities. The Principal Installments of the Bonds held by the VPSA coming due after July 15, 2011 and the definitive Bonds for which the Bonds held by the VPSA may be exchanged that mature after July 15, 2011 are subject to prepayment or redemption at the option of the County prior to their stated maturities in whole or in part, on any date on or after July 15, 2011 upon payment of the prepayment or redemption prices (expressed as percentages of Principal Installments to be prepaid or the principal amount of the Bonds to be redeemed) set forth below plus accrued interest to the date set for prepayment or redemption: Dates Prices July 15, 2011 to July 14, 2012, inclusive .............. 102% July 15, 2012 to July 14, 2013, inclusive .............. 101 July 15, 2013 and thereafter ........................ 100% Provided, however, that the Bonds shall not be subject to prepayment or redemption prior to their stated maturities as described above without first obtaining the written consent of the registered owner of the Bonds. Notice of any such prepayment or redemption shall be given by the Bond Registrar to the registered owner by registered mail not more than ninety (90) and not less than sixty (60) days before the date fixed for prepayment or redemption. The County Administrator is authorized to approve such other redemption provisions, including changes to the redemption dates set forth above, as may be requested by the VPSA. 8. Execution of the Bonds. The Chairman or Vice Chairman and the Clerk or any Deputy Clerk of the Board are authorized and directed to execute and deliver the Bonds and to affix the seal of the County thereto. 9. Pledge of Full Faith and Credit. For the prompt payment of the principal of, and the premium, if any, and the interest on the Bonds as the same shall become due, the full faith and credit of the County are hereby irrevocably pledged, and in each year while any of the Bonds shall be outstanding there shall be levied and collected in accordance with law an annual ad valorem tax upon all taxable property in the County subject to local taxation sufficient in amount to provide for the payment of the principal of, and the premium, if any, and the interest on the Bonds as such principal, premium, if any, and interest shall become due, which tax shall be without limitation as to rate or amount and in addition to all other taxes authorized to be levied in the County to the extent other funds of the County are not lawfully available and appropriated for such purpose. 3 10. Use of Proceeds Certificate; Non-Arbitrage Certificate. The Chairman of the Board and the County Administrator, or either of them and such officer or officers of the County as either may designate are hereby authorized and directed to execute aNon- Arbitrage Certificate, if requested by bond counsel, and a Use of Proceeds Certificate setting forth the expected use and investment of the proceeds of the Bonds and containing such covenants as may be necessary in order to show compliance with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), and applicable regulations relating to the exclusion from gross income of interest on the Bonds and on the VPSA Bonds. The Board covenants on behalf of the County that (i) the proceeds from the issuance and sale of the Bonds will be invested and expended as set forth in such Use of Proceeds Certificate and the County shall comply with the covenants and representations contained therein and (ii) the County shall comply with the provisions of the Code, except as provided above, so that interest on the Bonds and on the VPSA Bonds will remain excludable from gross income for Federal income tax purposes. 11. State Non-Arbitrage Program; Proceeds Agreement. The Board hereby determines that it is in the best interests of the County to authorize and direct the County Treasurer to participate in the State Non-Arbitrage Program in connection with the Bonds. The County Administrator and the Chairman of the Board, or either of them, and such officer or officers of the County as either of them may designate, are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver a Proceeds Agreement with respect to the deposit and investment of proceeds of the Bonds by and among the County, the other participants in the sale of the VPSA Bonds, the VPSA, the investment manager, and the depository substantially in the form on file with the County Administrator, which form is hereby approved. 12. Continuing Disclosure Agreement. The Chairman of the Board and the County Administrator, or either of them, and such officer or officers of the County as either of them may designate are hereby authorized and directed (i) to execute a Continuing Disclosure Agreement, as set forth in Appendix F to the Bond Sale Agreement, setting forth the reports and notices to be filed by the County and containing such covenants as may be necessary in order to show compliance with the provisions of the Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 15c2-12 and (ii) to make all filings required by Section 3 of the Bond Sale Agreement should the County be determined by the VPSA to be a MOP (as defined in the Continuing Disclosure Agreement). 13. Filing of Resolution. The appropriate officers or agents of the County are hereby authorized and directed to cause a certified copy of this Resolution to be filed with the Circuit Court of the County. 14. Further Actions. The County Administrator, the Chairman of the Board, and such other officers, employees and agents of the County as either of them may designate are hereby authorized to take such action as the County Administrator or the Chairman of the Board may consider necessary or desirable in connection with the issuance and sale of the Bonds and any such action previously taken is hereby ratified and confirmed. 4 15. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect immediately. The undersigned Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, hereby certifies that the foregoing constitutes a true and correct extract from the minutes of a meeting of the Board of Supervisors held on March 27, 2001, and of the whole thereof so far as applicable to the matters referred to in such extract. I hereby further certify that such meeting was a regularly scheduled meeting and that, during the consideration of the foregoing resolution, a quorum was present. The front page of this Resolution accurately records (i) the members of the Board of Supervisors present at the meeting, (ii) the members who were absent from the meeting, and (iii) the vote of each member, including any abstentions. WITNESS MY HAND and the seal of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, this 27th day of March, 2001. On motion of Supervisor McNamara to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: .~- ~~t.-C~_ Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Diane D. Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer Danial Morris, Director, Finance Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Dr. Linda Weber, School Superintendent Brenda Chastain, Clerk, School Board 5 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA March 27, 2001 At a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, held on March 27, 2001, the following persons were present or absent as shown: PRESENT: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix Harrison, Nickens, Johnson ABSENT: None Upon motion by Supervisor McNamara, the following resolution was adopted by a majority of the members of the Board of Supervisors by the following roll call vote, as recorded in the minutes of the meeting: MEMBER VOTE Bob L. Johnson Yes Joseph McNamara Yes Joseph B. Church Yes Harry C. Nickens Yes H. Odell Minnix Yes ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 27, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: Public Hearing for the Issuance of Virginia Public School Authority Bonds of $16,500,000 for Hidden Valley High School, Glenvar Middle School, and Roof Repairs COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: •'`'~~ ~~ BACKGROUND: The Board of Supervisors has previously approved the final budgets for Hidden Valley High School and the renovations to Glenvar Middle School as shown on Attachment A and Attachment B. In addition, there are still funds needed for the roof repair program that was approved in Phase I of the School Capital Plan. The amounts that still need to be borrowed are outlined below: Hidden Valley High School Glenvar Middle School Roof Replacement Total Literary Loans $7,500,000 6,245,000 0 $13,745,000 VPSA $15,001,283 1,410,767 87,950 $16,500,000 Total $22,501,283 7,655,767 87,950 $30,245,000 In addition, the interest income earned on the bond proceeds (estimated at $415,000) will be used to complete the roofing program. On February 13, 2001, the Board of Supervisors approved the submittal of an application to participate in the Spring 2001 Virginia Public School Authority (VPSA) bond sale for $16,500,000. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: We have submitted the required application and resolutions to participate in the Spring 2001 VPSA bond sale. As part of this application process, a public hearing must be held and a specific resolution as to the form of bonds must be adopted by the Board. s-y FISCAL IMPACT: The first debt payment on the issue will not occur until the 2001-02 fiscal year. Debt payments are estimated to be $684,750 (interest only) for 2001-02, and $1,790,250 (principal and interest) for 2002-03. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that at the conclusion of the public hearing, the Board adopt the attached resolution that authorizes the issuance of VPSA bonds in the Spring 2001 bond sale for and amount not to exceed $16,500,000. Respectfully Submitted by Approved by: ,~ ~~ ~~~ L~ Diane D. Hyatt Elmer C. Hodge Chief Financial Officer County Administrator ACTION VOTE No. Yes Abs Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Motion by: Minnix Nickens Church Johnson McNamara cc: File Q •+. C C~ G V Q M~ W ~ ~ V m •~ t a ~_ r N ~ ~ ~ ~ _ a C ~ c 3 ~ O 7 t LL O m ~ ~ ~ C 0 C (6 ~-- O v~ h m 0 y ... S ~N,, L_ m c O U C N U o ~ O .r O ~0 N U C O. ~ O O ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ 7 t~~6 0 O ~~ C U C ~ C ~ ~ ~ C7 m O W } U ~ a. rn >~ 00N 0000000(0 0 0 0 M O O O O M ' ' ' ' ' O~OOf~00001~ N f~ ~ 00000 t0 ~tn0M0000O CO 1~ h M N O (`7 d' f0 ~ ~ .- O O O O O t!) 0 N 0 O M lA ONO N 00 O ~ O O O O N CO O0i O O O O 0 ~ ~ N O O CO O OD r r N ~ M 00 N 0 M N N O O O O O M M N 0 O O d' O lf) O O O O O 00 N t0 0 0 O ... Sri 000C000aON~0000000 O 0000000C0M00000 O 00aD~A00~N1~000000 O MONa00Nh000000sF O NO(0N0.7M~DM000OM O Op tt ~ C0 1~ O I~ M N O M 0 O N ~ CO M a- ~ ~ O M (00000' O 00000 O 000000 00000 O 0 0~ 0 0 t 0 ' 0' 0 0 0 0 0 O M00000 N OOOOM O ~O~MO~ c00 MNOc~O O N ~ ~ M ~ ~ O ~ M N C ~ C ~ O C ~ i aW N y ~ ~ O c U N (O N W ~ y O o U rn L' U r N r' i ~ 'o M n a O O O O O O O O N N O O O ~ M O ' O C O 0 0 ' ' ' ' O O~ A ~- ~ O O O O N O O O M N r. ~ ~~ r- CO h tq N N ~ ~ ~ M r- r 00 N T Of .. O C p N C t0 0 d U C . C N 4C-- 'C 7 ~ N ~ ~ ~ Q~ C C ~ C C O tLii ~ to 'C ~ ~ 0) N V N C U ~ a? m E E ~ ~ m .- L c c c n n: c ~ >' °mQo~'>rn~c ~ 'rn c v~ y~ c y c~ y C C W~~ C O N N~ O ~~ C ~~¢>a)Uacnfn~>ti~U S-`I 0 O N O M O y X N 0 7 m O U t 0 n ~U L U C O O U m v c 06 C LL m 0 v = O V ~ to a as H ~ ~ L ~ a L C d Zr' m r+ C d t V Q ~ c ~~ ~ O .-. 7 LL O m ~ U ~ ~ O 7 ~ ~ ~, LL N O U `~ o ~Z a~ ~ '~ C N ~ O ~U ~' N j O ma ooocooo~ o000 ~ ooorno~~ ooo~n co coc~ocoo•-rte ooo~ r~ o co uS m o m r~ ui o o ao ui ~NNNN•-M OOQO ~ CO ~ O O p O O N N to r ~ ~ OOO(0OO~ OOOO 1~ 00000-r- 000 (O CpMOtOOr-f~ ' 000 ~ N(O~ACOOCOI~ X0000 O N ~~ M N ~ M~~ _ N ~ 00 co ~ ~ O ~ O O O ' ' ' ' O O ' ' O~~ O N ~~0~0(~O O ~ N ~ M N M 0 o T. C ~ ~ ~ N ~ .C E N C fl- V C O C N~ '~ r N ~ ~ N~ C C~ N N ~ N O V~~~ N~ U N C ~ U N X 0 0 "O N O OJ ~ U C C ~ > > ~ ~ ~ p) Q 0 0 0 'O N N Z ~~ C f0 °~ (p 0 .~ 'O O «. ~. O O O O c Q>U~Qainincn~~U~ S-y O O N 0 M 0 X N CA .a m N c a~ (~ a U U C O O U U C (6 c li S-Y RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA March 27, 2001 At a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, held on March 27, 2001, the following persons were present or absent as shown: PRESENT: ABSENT: Upon motion by ,seconded by the following resolution was adopted by a majority of the members of the Board of Supervisors by the following roll call vote, as recorded in the minutes of the meeting: MEMBER VOTE S-`~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 27,2001 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF NOT TO EXCEED $16,500,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION SCHOOL BONDS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA TO BE SOLD TO THE VIRGINIA PUBLIC SCHOOL AUTHORITY AND PROVIDING FOR THE FORM AND DETAILS THEREOF WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors (the "Board") of the County of Roanoke, Virginia (the "County") has determined that it is necessary and expedient to borrow $16,500,000 and to issue its general obligation school bonds to finance certain capital projects for school purposes. WHEREAS, the County has held a public hearing, after due publication of notice, in accordance with Section 15.2-2606, Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended ("Virginia Code") on March 27, 2001 on the issuance of school bonds in an amount not to exceed $16,500,000. WHEREAS, the School Board of the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("School Board") has requested by resolution the Board to authorize the issuance of the Bonds (as defined below) and has consented to the issuance of the Bonds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA: 1. Authorization of Bonds and Use of Proceeds. The Board hereby determines that it is advisable to contract a debt and to issue and sell general obligation school bonds of the County in the aggregate principal amount not to exceed $16,500,000 (the "Bonds") for the purpose of financing certain capital projects for school purposes. The Board hereby authorizes the issuance and sale of the Bonds in the form and upon the terms established pursuant to this Resolution. 2. Sale of the Bonds. It is determined to be in the best interest of the County to accept the offer of the Virginia Public School Authority (the "VPSA") to purchase from the County, and to sell to the VPSA, the Bonds at a price determined by the VPSA and accepted by the Chairman of the Board or the County Administrator, such price to be not less than 98% of par and not more than 103% of par (105% of par for bonds with a final maturity of 10 years or less), and upon the terms established pursuant to this Resolution. The County Administrator and the Chairman of the Board, or either of them, and such officer or officers of the County as either of them may designate, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into the Bond Sale Agreement dated as of Apri12, 2001, with the VPSA providing for the sale of the Bonds to the VPSA in substantially the form on file with the County Administrator, which form is hereby approved ("Bond Sale Agreement"). -y 3. Details of the Bonds. The Bonds shall be issuable in fully registered form; shall be dated the date of issuance and delivery of the Bonds; shall be designated "General Obligation School Bonds, Series 2001 "; shall bear interest from the date of delivery thereof payable semi- annually on each January 15 and July 15 (each an "Interest Payment Date"), beginning January 15, 2002, at the rates established in accordance with paragraph 4 of this Resolution; and shall mature on July 15 in the years (each a "Principal Payment Date") and in the amounts established in accordance with paragraph 4 of this Resolution. The Interest Payment Dates and the Principal Payment Dates are subject to change at the request of VPSA. 4. Principal Installments and Interest Rates. The County Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to accept the interest rates on the Bonds established by the VPSA, provided that each interest rate shall be ten one-hundredths of one percent (0.10%) over the interest rate to be paid by the VPSA for the corresponding principal payment date of the bonds to be issued by the VPSA (the "VPSA Bonds"), a portion of the proceeds of which will be used to purchase the Bonds, and provided further, that the true interest cost of the Bonds does not exceed seven percent (7%) per annum. The County Administrator is further authorized and directed to accept the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds and the amounts of principal of the Bonds coming due on each Principal Payment Date ("Principal Installments") established by the VPSA, including any changes in the Interest Payment Dates, the Principal Payment Dates and the Principal Installments which may be requested by VPSA provided that such aggregate principal amount shall not exceed the maximum amount set forth in paragraph one and the final maturity of the Bonds shall not be later than 21 years from their date. The execution and delivery of the Bonds as described in paragraph 8 hereof shall conclusively evidence such Interest Payment Dates, Principal Payment Dates, interest rates, principal amount and Principal Installments as having been so accepted as authorized by this Resolution. 5. Form of the Bonds. The Bonds shall be initially in the form of one or more temporary typewritten bonds substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A. 6. Payment• Paving Agent and Bond Registrar. The following provisions shall apply to the Bonds: (a) For as long as the VPSA is the registered owner of the Bonds, all payments of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds shall be made in immediately available funds to the VPSA at or before 11:00 a.m. on the applicable Interest Payment Date, Principal Payment Date or date fixed for prepayment or redemption, or if such date is not a business day for Virginia banks or for the Commonwealth of Virginia, then at or before 11:00 a.m. on the business day next preceding such Interest Payment Date, Principal Payment Date or date fixed for prepayment or redemption; (b) All overdue payments of principal and, to the extent permitted by law, interest shall bear interest at the applicable interest rate or rates on the Bonds; and (c) SunTrust Bank, Richmond, Virginia is designated as Bond Registrar and Paying Agent for the Bonds. .~. ~~ 7. Pre~ayment or Redemption. The Principal Installments of the Bonds held by the VPSA coming due on or before July 15, 2011, and the definitive Bonds for which the Bonds held by the VPSA may be exchanged that mature on or before July 15, 2011 are not subject to prepayment or redemption prior to their stated maturities. The Principal Installments of the Bonds held by the VPSA coming due after July 15, 2011 and the definitive Bonds for which the Bonds held by the VPSA may be exchanged that mature after July 15, 2011 aze subject to prepayment or redemption at the option of the County prior to their stated maturities in whole or in part, on any date on or after July 15, 2011 upon payment of the prepayment or redemption prices (expressed as percentages of Principal Installments to be prepaid or the principal amount of the Bonds to be redeemed) set forth below plus accrued interest to the date set for prepayment or redemption: Dates Prices July 15, 2011 to July 14, 2012, inclusive ................................................. 102% July 15, 2012 to July 14, 2013, inclusive ................................................. 101% July 15, 2013 and thereafter ................................................................... 100% Provided, however, that the Bonds shall not be subject to prepayment or redemption prior to their stated maturities as described above without first obtaining the written consent of the registered owner of the Bonds. Notice of any such prepayment or redemption shall be given by the Bond Registrar to the registered owner by registered mail not more than ninety (90) and not less than sixty (60) days before the date fixed for prepayment or redemption. The County Administrator is authorized to approve such other redemption provisions, including changes to the redemption dates set forth above, as may be requested by the VPSA. 8. Execution of the Bonds. The Chairman or Vice Chairman and the Clerk or any Deputy Clerk of the Board are authorized and directed to execute and deliver the Bonds and to affix the seal of the County thereto. 9. Pled¢e of Full Faith and Credit. For the prompt payment of the principal of, and the premium, if any, and the interest on the Bonds as the same shall become due, the full faith and credit of the County aze hereby irrevocably pledged, and in each year while any of the Bonds shall be outstanding there shall be levied and collected in accordance with law an annual ad valorem tax upon all taxable property in the County subject to local taxation sufficient in amount to provide for the payment of the principal of, and the premium, if any, and the interest on the Bonds as such principal, premium, if any, and interest shall become due, which tax shall be without limitation as to rate or amount and in addition to all other taxes authorized to be levied in the County to the extent other funds of the County are not lawfully available and appropriated for such purpose. 10. Use of Proceeds Certificate• Non-Arbitrage Certificate. The Chairman of the Boazd and the County Administrator, or either of them and such officer or officers of the County as either may designate aze hereby authorized and directed to execute aNon-Arbitrage Certificate, if requested by bond counsel, and a Use of Proceeds Certificate setting forth the expected use and investment of the proceeds of the Bonds and containing such covenants as may be necessary in order to show compliance with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), and applicable regulations relating to the exclusion from gross income of interest on the Bonds and on the VPSA Bonds. The Boazd covenants on behalf of the County that (i) the S_y proceeds from the issuance and sale of the Bonds will be invested and expended as set forth in such Use of Proceeds Certificate and the County shall comply with the covenants and representations contained therein and (ii) the County shall comply with the provisions of the Code, except as provided above, so that interest on the Bonds and on the VPSA Bonds will remain excludable from gross income for Federal income tax purposes. 11. State Non Arbitrage Pro~ram• Proceeds Agreement. The Board hereby determines that it is in the best interests of the County to authorize and direct the County Treasurer to participate in the State Non-Arbitrage Program in connection with the Bonds. The County Administrator and the Chairman of the Board, or either of them, and such officer or officers of the County as either of them may designate, are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver a Proceeds Agreement with respect to the deposit and investment of proceeds of the Bonds by and among the County, the other participants in the sale of the VPSA Bonds, the VPSA, the investment manager, and the depository substantially in the form on file with the County Administrator, which form is hereby approved. 12. Continuing_Disclosure Agreement. The Chairman of the Board and the County Administrator, or either of them, and such officer or officers of the County as either of them may designate are hereby authorized and directed (i) to execute a Continuing Disclosure Agreement, as set forth in Appendix F to the Bond Sale Agreement, setting forth the reports and notices to be filed by the County and containing such covenants as may be necessary in order to show compliance with the provisions of the Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 15c2-12 and (ii) to make all filings required by Section 3 of the Bond Sale Agreement should the County be determined by the VPSA to be a MOP (as defined in the Continuing Disclosure Agreement). 13. Filing, of Resolution. The appropriate officers or agents of the County are hereby authorized and directed to cause a certified copy of this Resolution to be filed with the Circuit Court of the County. 14. Further Actions. The County Administrator, the Chairman of the Board, and such other officers, employees and agents of the County as either of them may designate are hereby authorized to take such action as the County Administrator or the Chairman of the Board may consider necessary or desirable in connection with the issuance and sale of the Bonds and any such action previously taken is hereby ratified and confirmed. 15. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect immediately. The undersigned Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, hereby certifies that the foregoing constitutes a true and correct extract from the minutes of a meeting of the Board of Supervisors held on March 27, 2001, and of the whole thereof so far as applicable to the matters referred to in such extract. I hereby further certify that such meeting was a regularly scheduled meeting and that, during the consideration of the foregoing resolution, a quorum was present. The front page of this Resolution accurately records (i) the members of the Board of Supervisors present at the meeting, (ii) the members who were absent from the meeting, and (iii) the vote of each member, including any abstentions. S-~ WITNESS MY HAND and the seal of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, this 27th day of March, 2001. Clerk, Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia (SEAL) EXHIBIT A (FORM OF TEMPORARY BOND) S-`I NO. TR-1 $16,500,000 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF ROANOKE General Obligation School Bond Series 2001 The COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA (the "County"), for value received, hereby acknowledges itself indebted and promises to pay to the VIRGINIA PUBLIC SCHOOL AUTHORITY the principal amount of Sixteen Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($16,500,000), in annual installments in the amounts set forth on Schedule I attached hereto payable on July 15, 2002 and annually on July 15 thereafter to and including July 15, 2022 (each a "Principal Payment Date"), together with interest from the date of this Bond on the unpaid installments, payable semi-annually on January 15 and July 15 of each year commencing on January 15, 2002 (each an "Interest Payment Date"; together with any Principal Payment Date, a "Payment Date"), at the rates per annum set forth on Schedule I attached hereto, subject to prepayment or redemption as hereinafter provided. Both principal of and interest on this Bond are payable in lawful money of the United States of America. For as long as the Virginia Public School Authority is the registered owner of this Bond, SunTrust Bank, Richmond, Virginia as bond registrar (the "Bond Registrar") shall make all payments of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on this Bond, without presentation or surrender hereof, to the Virginia Public School Authority, in immediately available funds at or s-Y before 11:00 a.m. on the applicable Payment Date or date faced for prepayment or redemption. If a Payment Date or date fixed for prepayment or redemption is not a business day for banks in the Commonwealth of Virginia or for the Commonwealth of Virginia, then the payment of principal of, premium, if any, or interest on this Bond shall be made in immediately available funds at or before 11:00 a.m. on the business day next preceding the scheduled Payment Date or date fixed for prepayment or redemption. Upon receipt by the registered owner of this Bond of said payments of principal, premium, if any, and interest, written acknowledgment of the receipt thereof shall be given promptly to the Bond Registrar, and the County shall be fully discharged of its obligation on this Bond to the extent of the payment so made. Upon final payment, this Bond shall be surrendered to the Bond Registrar for cancellation. The full faith and credit of the County are irrevocably pledged for the payment of the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on this Bond. The resolution adopted by the Board of Supervisors authorizing the issuance of the Bonds provides, and Section 15.2-2624 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, a amended, requires, that there shall be levied and collected an annual tax upon all taxable property in the County subject to local taxation sufficient to provide for the payment of the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on this Bond as the same shall become due which tax shall be without limitation as to rate or amount and shall be in addition to all other taxes authorized to be levied in the County to the extent other funds of the County are not lawfully available and appropriated for such purpose. This Bond is duly authorized and issued in compliance with and pursuant to the Constitution and laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia, including the Public Finance Act of 1991, Chapter 26, Title 15.2, Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, and resolutions duly adopted -2- s-y by the Board of Supervisors of the County and the School Board of the County to provide funds for capital projects for school purposes. This Bond may be exchanged without cost on twenty (20) days written notice from the Virginia Public School Authority, at the office of the Bond Registrar on one or more occasions for one or more temporary bonds or definitive bonds in marketable form and, in any case, in fully registered form, in denominations of $5,000 and whole multiples thereof, and having an equal aggregate principal amount, having principal installments or maturities and bearing interest at rates corresponding to the maturities of and the interest rates on the installments of principal of this Bond then unpaid. This Bond is registered in the name of the Virginia Public School Authority on the books of the County kept by the Bond Registrar, and the transfer of this Bond may be effected by the registered owner of this Bond only upon due execution of an assignment by such registered owner. Upon receipt of such assignment and the surrender of this Bond, the Bond Registrar shall exchange this Bond for definitive Bonds as hereinabove provided, such definitive Bonds to be registered on such registration books in the name of the assignee or assignees named in such assignment. The principal installments of this Bond coming due on or before July 15, 2011 and the definitive Bonds for which this Bond may be exchanged that mature on or before July 15, 2011 are not subject to prepayment or redemption prior to their stated maturities. The principal installments of this Bond coming due after July 15, 2011, and the definitive Bonds for which this Bond may be exchanged that mature after July 15, 2011 are subject to prepayment or redemption at the option of the County prior to their stated maturities in whole or in part, on any date on or after July 15, 2011, upon payment of the prepayment or redemption prices (expressed as -3- S-y percentages of principal installments to be prepaid or the principal amount of the Bonds to be redeemed) set forth below plus accrued interest to the date set for prepayment or redemption: Dates Prices July 15, 2011 to July 14, 2012, inclusive ................................................. 102% July 15, 2012 to July 14, 2013, inclusive .......................................~~~~~~~~"~ 100% July 15, 2013 and thereafter ................................................................... Provided, however, that the Bonds shall not be subject to prepayment or redemption prior to their stated maturities as described above without the prior written consent of the registered owner of the Bonds. Notice of any such prepayment or redemption shall be given by the Bonds Registrar to the registered owner by registered mail not more than ninety (90) and not less than sixty (60) days before the date fixed for prepayment or redemption. All acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia to happen, exist or be performed precedent to and in the issuance of this Bond have happened, exist and have been performed in due time, form and manner as so required, and this Bond, together with all other indebtedness of the County, is within every debt and other limit prescribed by the Constitution and laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia. -4- ""~''f IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, has caused this Bond to be issued in the name of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, to be signed by its Chairman, its seal to be affixed hereto and attested by the signature of its Clerk, and this Bond to be dated , 2001. (SEAL) ATTEST: Clerk, Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA By Chairman, Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia -5- S-~ ASSIGNMENT FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned sells, assigns and transfers unto (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE) the within Bond and irrevocably constitutes and appoints attorney to exchange said Bond for definitive bonds in lieu of which this Bond is issued and to register the transfer of such definitive bonds on the books kept for registration thereof, with full power of substitution in the premises. PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE: _ Dated: Signature Guaranteed: (NOTICE: Signature(s) must be guaranteed by an "eligible guarantor institution meeting the requirements of the Bond Registrar which requirements will include membership or participation in STAMP or such other "signature guarantee program" as may be determined by the Bond Registrar in addition to, or in substitution for, STAMP, all in accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.) \\FIN\41911.1 Registered Owner (NOTICE: The signature above must correspond with the name of the Registered Owner as it appears on the front of this Bond in every particular, without alteration or change.) • • -6- ~~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MARCH 27, 2001 ORDINANCE 032701-14 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 200-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 5350 POOR MOUNTAIN ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 65.00-2-24) IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1, LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF AG-3, AGRICULTURE/RURAL PRESERVE DISTRICT WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF JUDY GUSTAFSON WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 27, 2001, and the second reading and public hearing were held March 27, 2001; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 6, 2001; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 200 acres, as described herein, and located at 5350 Poor Mountain Road (Tax Map Number 65.00-2-24) in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-1, Low Density Residential District, to the zoning classification of AG-3, Agriculture/Rural Preserve District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Judy Gustafson. 3. That the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts: (1) No more than 18 horses will reside on the property containing 200 1 acres and shown on metes and bounds survey by T. P. Parker & Son, dated November 28, 1989. (2) A maximum of 3 riding clinics may be held in any calendar year. A clinic is defined as an organized training/education event, involving a maximum of 10non-resident horses and occurring over a 2-day period. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Beginning at a point on the west side of Virginia Secondary Route 612, also known as Poor Mountain Road, and corner to the property herein described designated as Point No. 1, as shown on Boundary Survey and Subdivision for Mark W. and Judy S. Gustafson by T. P. Parker & Son dated November 28, 1989 and recorded in the Roanoke County Circuit Court Clerk's Office in Plat Book 12, page 48; thence leaving said point of beginning and following the west side of Poor Mountain Road N. 09 deg. 23' 49" W. 117.60 feet to Point No. 2; thence continuing along the west side of said road with a curve to the left whose radius is 445.00 feet and whose length is 134.53 feet (chord=N. 18 deg. 03' 27" W. 134.01 feet) to Point No. 3; thence continuing along the west side of said road N. 26 deg. 43' 04" W. 311.48 feet to Point No. 4; thence N. 78 deg. 44' 00" E. 15.08 feet to the center of said road at Point No. 5; thence up the centerline of said road the following courses and distances: N. 25 deg. 04' 44" W. 44.36 feet to Point No. 6; thence N. 22 deg. 44' 43" W. 84.64 feet to Point No. 7; thence N. 12 deg. 38' 20" W. 70.33 feet to Point No. 8; thence N. 03 deg. 35' 17" W. 65.20 feet to Point No. 9; thence N. 01 deg. 34' 38" W. 140.44 feet to Point No. 10; thence N. 04 deg. 16' 53" W. 185.57 feet to Point No. 11; thence N. 05 deg. 56' 08" W. 182.02 feet to Point No. 12; thence N. 02 deg. 46' 47" W. 48.31 feet to Point No. 13; thence N. 00 deg. 58' 38" W. 70.94 feet to Point No. 14; thence N. 03 deg. 14' 02" W. 89.53 feet to Point No. 15; thence N. 05 deg. 13' 39" W. 49.81 feet to Point No. 16; thence N. 06 deg. 06' 28" W. 106.52 feet to an iron pin set at Point No. 17; thence leaving Poor Mountain Road N. 63 deg. 16' 17" E. 233.00 feet to a pin set at Point No. 18; thence S. 75 deg. 48' 43" E. 192.00 feet to a pin set at Point No. 19; thence S. 12 deg. 11' 17" W. 33.00 feet to a 36" sycamore at Point No. 20; thence S. 83 deg. 04' 07" E. 1881.00 feet to a pin set at Point No. 21; thence N. 79 deg. 10' S9" E. 1925.23 feet to a pin set at Point No. 22; thence S. 18 deg. 25' 08" E. 235.95 feet to 18" twin hickories at Point No. 23; thence S. 35 deg. 58' 08" E. 1572.22 feet to a 24" white oak at Point No. 24; thence S. 21 deg. 33' 18" W. 575.23 feet to an old pin at Point No. 25; thence N. 62 deg. 43' 33" W. 1648.26 feet to an old pin at Point No. 26; thence S. 12 deg. 14' 44" W. to a 24" black gum at Point No. 27; thence S. 05 deg. 16' 10" W. 275.70 feet to a pin set at Point No. 28; thence S. 50 deg. 21' 00" W. 885.81 2 feet to a pin set at Point No. 29; thence S. 02 deg. 39' 00" W. 716.98 feet to a pin set at Point No. 30; thence N. 55 deg. 09' 00" W. 420.00 feet to a pin set at Point No. 31; thence N. 49 deg. 40' 00" W. 630.00 feet to a pin set at Point No. 32; thence N. 58 deg. 18' 00" VV. 641.00 feet to a pin set at Point No. 33; thence N. 63 deg. 03' 00" W. 42.00 feet to a pin set at Point No. 34; thence S. 78 deg. 17' 00" W. 92.00 feet to a pin set at Point No. 35; thence N. 10 deg. 29' 25" W. 110.00 feet to Point No. 36; thence N. 82 deg. 48' 00" W. 492.45 feet to the Point Of Beginning and containing 200.00 acres. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Church to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: .J~v~. < <.2.G.e.~~ Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Terry Harrington, County Planner William E. Driver, Director, Real Estate Valuation Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 3 ROANOKE COUNTY Applicants Name: Judy Gustafson DEPARTMENT OF Zoning: Rezoning AG-3 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tax Map No. 65.00-2-24 T- PETITIONER: Judy Gustafson CASE NUMBER: 6-3/2001 Planning Commission Hearing Date: March 6, 2001 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: March 27, 2001 A. REQUEST The petition of Judy Gustafson to rezone 200 acres from R-1 Residential District to AG-3 Agriculture for a commercial stable located on 5350 Poor Mountain Road, Salem, VA 24153, Catawba Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS No citizens spoke. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION Ms. Janet Scheid presented the staff report. The Planning Commission asked about horse manure disposal and Dr. Gustafson stated that a dairy farmer from Catawba hauls off the horse manure on a regular basis to use as fertilizer on his farm. In addition, the pastures are regularly "raked" with a tractor to break up manure and speed up its decomposition. Ms. Hooker, Mr. Ross and Mr. Thomason all stated that a commercial stable seemed to be an ideal use of this 200 acres. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS No more than eighteen (18) horses will reside on the property containing 200 acres and shown on metes and bounds survey by T.P. Parker & Son, dated March 12, 2001. A maximum of three (3) riding clinics may be held in any calendar year. A clinic is defined as an organized training/education event, involving a maximum of ten (10) non-resident horses and occurring over a two (2) day period. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Ms. Martha Hooker made a motion to approve the request with the conditions. Motion carried 4-0. Mr. Witt was absent. F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report _ Other Terrance Harrington, Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commission r- ~ Case Number: 6-3/2001 Applicant: Judy Gustafson STAFF REPORT Prepared by: Janet Scheid Date: March 6, 2001 PART I A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Dr. Gustafson purchased this property in 1990 specifically for the purpose of building her home and stabling horses. At that time the property was zoned agricultural and the barn and horses were permitted by right. In 1992 the County rezoned this property to R-1, Residential due in part, to the location of the new County water line. Dr. Gustafson's continued use of the property for a private stable is grandfathered. At this time though she would like to expand that use to include aspects of a commercial stable such as private riding lessons, a limited number of training clinics and boarding of several horses. She plans to conduct no more than 2 private riding lessons per day using horses already stabled on the property so these lessons would not entail any additional horse trailer traffic on Poor Mountain Road. Dr. Gustafson also plans to host 3 training clinics per year which would involve approximately five riders and no more than five small horse trailers. Dr. Gustafson is requesting that her property be rezoned from R-1, Residential to AG-3, Agricultural to allow a commercial stable. The property is designated Development in the Roanoke County Community Plan. The R-1 zoning and the Development designation are a reflection of the proximity of the new Spring Hollow water line in this area. Dr. Gustafson's property is located on Poor Mountain Road in the Catawba Magisterial District. B. DESCRIPTION OF PETITION Petitioner is requesting to rezone this 200 acre property from R-1 to AG-3 in order to operate a commercial stable. When she purchased this property it was zoned AG-3 and she has had horses on the property since that time. Petitioner's use of the property as a private stable is grandfathered. Dr. Gustafson was unaware that the property had been rezoned, in 1992, to R-1. This area is not currently served by either public water or sewer and is almost exclusively large tracts of land, some used for agricultural purposes. Despite those factors, this zoning change was made in 1992 due to the 1 r- i property's close proximity to the new water line. Dr. Gustafson would like to use her property as a commercial stable in order to board several horses, provide limited private riding lessons and conduct limited training clinics on her property. She currently owns and stables eight horses on the property. Her barn facility can handle 12 horses. She estimates that on average she would have 12 horses on the property in the future. Petitioner has described the level of activity as an insignificant change over what exists there today. She intends to host three riding clinics per year at this facility which may involve, at the most, 5 small horse trailers using Poor Mountain Road on those days. In addition, two private lessons will be given per day primarily using the horses already stabled on the property. Horses will be trained at this facility, i.e., they will arrive at the stable for an extended stay and be trained on site by Ms. Gustaf son's training staff. Ms. Gustafson's stable is very close to the Equestrian Center at Green Hill Park and she plans to use that public facility for horse shows, events and clinics to the extent possible. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS 1. VDOT may require a commercial entrance permit. 2. The Roanoke County zoning ordinance permits commercial stables by right in the AG-3 zoning district with the following use and design standards: A. Five acres minimum. B. Fifty foot minimum setback for stables and riding arenas. C. Management plan for responsible and environmentally safe management of animal waste may be required by the Department of Environmental Quality. 2 PART II A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS 1. Lot Area - The ~ fenced pastures, steep slopes. Dr. an indoor riding husband reside on now. property is 200 acres and is a mixture of stable, outdoor riding arenas and wooded Gustafson is in the process of constructing arena for her personal use. She and her this property and stable eight horses there 2. Surrounding Community - The property is surrounded by other large lot residential and agricultural uses. To the north is 180 acres, zoned R-1. To the east is one tract of 60 acres zoned R-1 and another tract of 53 acres zoned AG-3. To the northeast is a tract of 131 acres zoned R-l. Horses can be seen on many of these properties. 3. Location - The property is located on Poor Mountain Road (Route 612) in the Catawba Magisterial District. It is approximately % mile from the intersection with Route 639, Harborwood Road. 4. Access - Access is from Poor Mountain Road. B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 1. Use - Dr. Gustafson primarily wants the flexibility to train horses and give a limited number of private lessons at this facility. She has had horses on the property for about 10 years and is an avid horsewoman. She currently stables eight horses of her own. Specifically, Dr. Gustafson plans to offer 2 private riding lessons per day, primarily using horses who already reside on the premises. Therefore these lessons will not increase horse trailer traffic on Poor Mountain Road. She also plans to conduct 3 training clinics per year involving approximately five riders. In addition, Dr. Gustafson will offer the on- premises training of horses whereby a client would bring their horse to her facility leaving it there for an extended training period. 2. Access to Site and Traffic - Access would remain the same although VDOT may provide additional review based on estimated traffic increase and may require a commercial entrance permit. Route 612 (Poor Mountain Road) is an Urban Collector Road with an estimated traffic count of 1,000 vehicles per day. Poor Mountain Road is a two lane road with a speed limit of 30 mph. 3 T- ~ 3 4 C. The planned use would have a very insignificant effect on daily traffic on this road. The training clinics that Dr. Gustafson would like to offer 3 times per year would involve a very limited increase in traffic on those particular days. It is expected that approximately five trailers would arrive and depart her facility on those 3 days per year. Public Services - No public water or sewer is available to this site. Environmental Issues - The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance requires the responsible and environmentally safe management of all animal wastes. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This property is zoned R-1 and designated Development in the Roanoke County Community Plan. Development areas are areas where we would expect new development to occur. This property, and the surrounding community, were all placed under this zoning category in 1992 and given this land use designation in 1998 due to the proximity of the new water line. The surrounding land pattern is predominately large lots ranging in size from five acres to over 200 acres. Currently there is no access to public water and sewer. Although the designation of Development is not consistent with the petitioner's request, staff is of the opinion that the designation may not be appropriate or at least merits some additional discussion. With the R-1 zoning and the Development land use designation the County is encouraging the conversion of these large tracts of residential/agricultural lands to higher density residential. The question on the table is does the County have the resource and financial capacity to adequately absorb the costs of these properties being converted to higher density residential uses - considering the impacts on the public schools, roads and traffic, loss of open space, etc. PART III STAFF CONCLUSIONS Staff recommends support of the petitioner's request to rezone this property from R-1 to AG-3 with the following considerations. Based on the large size of this property and the narrowness of Poor 4 T~ Mountain Road, the Planning Commission may want to consider limitations on the number of horses to be kept on this property as well as the number of clinics that would draw horse trailers (i.e., traffic) onto Poor Mountain Road. PREPARED BY: JANET SCHEID DATE PREPARED: FEBRUARY 28, 2001 5 A County of Roanoke Community Development Planning c~. Zoning 5?04 Bernard Drive P O Boa 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 (5~0) 772-2068 FAY (540) 772-2108 Dace received: . Received by: Anplicariun fee: PC'BZA date: _j, t_ ~ ..~ ~ ~, 1, Placards issued: BOS date: .~~ ~ ~ ~ a`. h I Case Number .,~ ^ ~~,.,!' ,c', ~ I ~1,CL APPLIC~-11VTS II eck type of application filed (check all that apply) Rezoning 0 Special Use 0 Variance Phone ~1L' " ' '~~ ~~ ~ ~ j L, !t"> ~ G~ „ Applicants name/address w/zip mot /"~= ' .a ,~~, ~ti.,;' t,~~~~~s;fse,*~ j~,,~.-~ h'~J -' ~ ~ C~~- Fax No. l` ~G ',~'~~ ~"~~ ~ " ' f , Cp ~,v1 1 S3`~L; t?rc' ~ JY~G~:f•, ~4 ~~c!/,~~3 Owners name; address w/zip Phone: c~~.~ ~ ~, -~ Fax No. l Property Location ~~ ~ Magisterial District: ''r,,.•-T,,~,,,,~-> ~ `~~'"~. ~--° ~~;-~ ,;,, ,,;~.., :^,. Community Planning area: Tax Map No.: Ct~~, ~~,, m.~ _ ~~ Existing Zoning: ~ -1 Size of parcel(s): Acres: c.C::a~_ ' Existing Land Use: ~i~~ ,~,,[_;,~ ,~.~i a-~, ~ ,,i? ,. ~~~'~ ~ ~~_~ REZO~V7IVG fi.v~ SPECI~IL USE PER:1-IIT ~PFLICf1~1~TS (RS) Proposed Zoning: ~~i~< ~~ Proposed Land Use: t~~~~,. ~'.?f°a~-~ .-~~,.,.S~az.: E~4;:>w `c,~ ~-~C ~1.t~: a~~ l Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes ~ No ~ IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIIED FIRST. ,~.._- ~ ~~~ No Does the parcel meet the minimtun criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes ©` IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes O No O ti~IANCE ~1FPLICANTS (V) ..._. Variance of Section(s) -,~:._.:._nf_the_Raanoke ~'n~m y..~ng Ordinance in order to: T- r ,~ '~' `~ ~., Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEiVIS ARE NIISSING OR INCOMPLETE. / V V R V ~' Consultation "~ 8 1/2" x 11" concept plan '~ ~ Application fee ~~~ Application Metes and bounds description ~- ~ Proffers, if applicable ~ ~ Tustification Y'u ~ Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the~roperty or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner. . ~ `~ , ~ y ~i~'w"t, ~~ ~i ~- j~Gl'.~'f ° ".~. Owner's Signature ~; s~ °.,!r ~~ ~,~~ Y ,. ROANOKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Applicants Name: Judy Gustafson Zoning: Rezoning AG-3 Tax Map No. 65.00-2-24 ~~yj~, ~=mm~m ~_ -, ~~ i _~, '~ ,~ ~ ~ = ~ ~~am~ a-M O S~dn Nods ~ o~ .~ °~s ~ 1 ~~ 1 ~ ~ m O ~ om ~~~ ~ d ~ '~1~ ~ G d ~ . \ , ~ ~ 7~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w ao A~ 2K N Z C µ ~ Z1.9 .58 N Z U 2 Z ° z _ -- P o ° °~N o ~ to • (x ~y { ~~ yy ~ s m ~ ? Q 6)d -~ --[[[//{ [r,- ? •y O O p 0=~1 _ roa ti m ~f~l~'O~n ~~ D M L 09~G Z NV N ° N NW Oy Ci ~ N~ NV{~Ql `JCL QQr .A AV x m a '~ ~ ~ y ~ D .'~ - 1 A rn im C ' .. r.`.-~,SiZZLZ 2 ~ = . N m A N ?~ W W ~ N CD 4 ~? W ~f~! ; N~ : m N I t.1 p -. U tglp$ ~~~'O ~ z CD N ~ N ~ N W.h ~w O t ~ ~ E1[ ~ ~U~ ~ ~ ~~ ` ~ ,~io'Kmy6D~~v~ ~ A A =rai ~ j`°i ~ ,."WU " °=~, ~ ~ ~ ~; o~ Q~ ~° , '.'~ SQ mCn~q o$C ~y o ,..~ in WA a? n~ G # ~ x.~ . ~ p~ ~ ~l~pv©~~~ Q O ~~ 01.2 ~' Z• ~ ~ wN a ''77 ~~ ~ ~ ~Km ~ ~ H 2 fi ~~ ~ ¢ ~ r' ? ;ag o va ~ ~ ~ N 9 ~ m ~o~ o ° c~ o ; ,t±, n a ~~~ 8 N m y \ \ ~\\ 5 ~i~ ~ m c„~ N-zi ~ ~ / ° O A ~ O o ~Q y4 \ o~~ n ~ ~v ~~ ~"= m .. m ~ 7 I .~.V+*~. t a " ^~ ® ~ ° ~ O ~ ° 1 ro oror~ .,~ ..._ __ m O 2 . 1 1 .on J ppp ~ ~ r n ~ Q Q ti ~X',~ ~ a n ~~ ~ ~ ~- m ~ ~ ~ ~ V a~° = O ~~ p. o • "~$j ~ m m ~ p ' p i g \ \ ~` O ~ ~ ~ o \ ~ W _'i y Z N ~ \ \ y _,......_ A g ~ ~ D oo m~ ' r• b ° ` z ~ ~ °- ® \\~ s 02.39.00- w ~ y ,~ \ \ ~,ti ® ~ \ s ~ m \ ~ \ . s ~ So. ss ,~ 1 c) ~ 80. \ z ~ (~ ~ ~ 1 ~ \ ~.. ; N 0 i ~ C j X55.92' S 5.70' ~ 30 ~~ S 05'16' ' N~ z v ~ M `_ ~ ~ 10 \ ''ti 8.0 W 123 7.62' B ~ w ~ ~ \ r.~ 5--, 7 . 27 ~ 1 ~(a \ rn ~ © 4 qq. ~ r l Z 1 ^ ~ (n 2 ~ 1 '. ~ ~ X mZm = .+ x~ ' A ~ v~ -gyp 2 p~ ~ ulro mZ ~ ~ o Vl ~ 4 `• y4Z e a x N N z„ ~ ~ 5y ~. ~o r p ; ~ ~ ~ ~ p OJ X ~ / L \\ D r. O°'N ? C7 vp~ 9 D ~ z D O 1L5` ~ 2 27 ~ ~ N X O ~ ti~ ~,~'/~ ~ ti `-~ ~n U OD ~ rn am p° 5 i n In R° C C r op ® ~c WpZp ~ v ~ ~ ' ~ ~ D `~' D C7 ~ m b 3 rr5 0~ ~ < n m ° 5jS? ~ c S 3• ? ° ~ A v °277 (n p ~ OO ~ no ap~ .. C -f m ~ ~ 7:1,1.7 ~ ro z 6~W ~ noQ N ~ s-1 x r*1 Z--i ~ 27 -I ~ >~ Az ~~ ~ Z x > to a m O OZ ~ v~ ~ _C D ~~ ~y Cn O ~ ~ ~ i N~O m ~ r ro N ~ v ~ & ~ G7 C ~ ~ W31Y5 p1- D ~ $ A O ~ O ~ N = ~ a K W C o ..~'. ,(~ p a rn LL r to i o ~ j .n tn p ~ ~J A ~ ~ D On ~ S a ~ " m= ~ ~ n m s O to -i ~ < z D N '~ O „~ .~ L a - p m 71 u z~ m Z st2 -1 - m ~ ~ .~ ~ n ° ' 7 ~ r D ~ ...-. ~ -~ ~ ~' ~ " r ~~ ~ a `C ! ~, t~ ~ z T RUE NORTH o a ~ ~ -`'li m ~ ~`y ~ _ ~ { T- / AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MARCH 27, 2001 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 200-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 5350 POOR MOUNTAIN ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 65.00-2-24) IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1, LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF AG-3, AGRICULTURE/RURAL PRESERVE DISTRICT WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF JUDY GUSTAFSON WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 27, 2001, and the second reading and public hearing were held March 27, 2001; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 6, 2001; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 200 acres, as described herein, and located at 5350 Poor Mountain Road (Tax Map Number 65.00-2-24) in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-1, Low Density Residential District, to the zoning classification of AG-3, Agriculture/Rural Preserve District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Judy Gustafson. That the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts: (1) No more than 18 horses will reside on the property containing 200 acres and shown on metes and bounds survey by T. P. Parker & Son, dated November 28, 1989. (2) A maximum of 3 riding clinics may be held in any calendar year. A clinic is defined as an organized training/education event, involving a maximum of 10 U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\ZONING\GUSTAFSON.RZN.frm 1 T~ non-resident horses and occurring over a 2-day period. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Beginning at a point on the west side of Virginia Secondary Route 612, also known as Poor Mountain Road, and corner to the property herein described designated as Point No. 1, as shown on Boundary Survey and Subdivision for Mark W. and Judy S. Gustafson by T. P. Parker & Son dated November 28,1989 and recorded in the Roanoke County Circuit Court Clerk's Office in Plat Book 12, page 48; thence leaving said point of beginning and following the west side of Poor Mountain Road N. 09 deg. 23' 49" W. 117.60 feet to Point No. 2; thence continuing along the west side of said road with a curve to the left whose radius is 445.00 feet and whose length is 134.53 feet (chord=N. 18 deg. 03' 27" W. 134.01 feet) to Point No. 3; thence continuing along the west side of said road N. 26 deg. 43' 04" W. 311.48 feet to Point No. 4; thence N. 78 deg. 44' 00" E. 15.08 feet to the center of said road at Point No. 5; thence up the centerline of said road the following courses and distances: N. 25 deg. 04' 44" W. 44.36 feet to Point No. 6; thence N. 22 deg. 44' 43" W. 84.64 feet to Point No. 7; thence N. 12 deg. 38' 20" W. 70.33 feet to Point No. 8; thence N. 03 deg. 35' 17" W. 65.20 feet to Point No. 9; thence N. O1 deg. 34' 38" W. 140.44 feet to Point No. 10; thence N. 04 deg. 16' S3" W. 185.57 feet to Point No. 11; thence N. OS deg. 56' 08" W. 182.02 feet to Point No. 12; thence N. 02 deg. 46' 47" W. 48.31 feet to Point No. 13; thence N. 00 deg. 58' 38" W. 70.94 feet to Point No. 14; thence N. 03 deg. 14' 02" W. 89.53 feet to Point No. 15; thence N. OS deg. 13' 39" W. 49.81 feet to Point No. 16; thence N. 06 deg. 06' 28" W. 106.52 feet to an iron pin set at Point No. 17; thence leaving Poor Mountain Road N. 63 deg.16' 17" E. 233.00 feet to a pin set at Point No. 18; thence S. 75 deg. 48' 43" E. 192.00 feet to a pin set at Point No. 19; thence S. 12 deg. 11' 17" W. 33.00 feet to a 36" sycamore at Point No. 20; thence S. 83 deg. 04' 07" E. 1881.00 feet to a pin set at Point No. 21; thence N. 79 deg. 10' S9" E. 1925.23 feet to a pin set at Point No. 22; thence S. 18 deg. 25' 08" E. 235.95 feet to 18" twin hickories at Point No. 23; thence S. 35 deg. 58' 08" E. 1572.22 feet to a 24" white oak at Point No. 24; thence S. 21 deg. 33' 18" W. 575.23 feet to an old pin at Point No. 25; thence N. 62 deg. 43' 33" W. 1648.26 feet to an old pin at Point No. 26; thence S. 12 deg. 14' 44" W. to a 24"black gum at Point No. 27; thence S. OS deg. 16' 10" W. 275.70 feet to a pin set at Point No. 28; thence S. 50 deg. 21' 00" W. 885.81 feet to a pin set at Point No. 29; thence S. 02 deg. 39' 00" W. 716.98 feet to a pin set at Point No. 30; thence N. 55 deg. 09' 00" W. 420.00 feet to a pin set at Point No. 31; thence N. 49 deg. 40' 00" W. 630.00 feet to a pin set at Point No. 32; thence N. 58 deg. 18' 00" W. 641.00 feet to a pin set at Point No. 33; thence N. 63 deg. 03' 00" W. 42.00 feet to a pin set at Point No. 34; thence S. 78 deg. 17' 00" W. 92.00 feet to a pin set at Point No. 35; thence N. 10 deg. 29' 25" W. 110.00 feet to Point No. 36; thence N. 82 deg. 48' 00" W. 492.45 feet to the Point Of Beginning and containing 200.00 acres. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\ZONING\GUSTAFSON.RZN.frm 2 PETITIONER: W. F. Walker CASE NUMBER: 7-3/2001 Planning Commission Hearing Date: March 6, 2001 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: March 27, 2001 A. REQUEST The petition of W. F. Walker to rezone 4.369 acres from AG-1, Agriculture to AR, Agricultural Residential to construct new single family houses located at 1114 Skyview Road (Route 755), Catawba Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS Mr. Dan Fligger expressed concerns over the roadway and its narrowness. He also was worried about locating a house on one of the new proposed lots near the sharp 180 degree turn. Additionally, possible clear cutting of trees to put in homes, the quality of the homes, and in his opinion the messy condition of the lot currently were issues of concern. Mr. Harold Watts stated that the road is so narrow in some points that when two cars meet, one will have to pull off to the side to let the other car by. He also was worried about clear cutting, the height of the homes, and other possible future development. Mr. Watts stated that during periods of ice, he has seen cars that have slid off the road and gone about 50 feet onto the subject property. Ms. Virginia Cadarian stated that she has been living in the neighborhood since 1960 and that people drive very fast on the road. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION Mr. David Tickner presented the staff report. Ms. Hooker stated that she thinks that this area may have been incorrectly designated as Neighborhood Conservation because of the location of the County water line. She considers Skyview Road dangerous and had erosion concerns. She thought that some of the trees would have to be cut in order to put septic systems in. Mr. Ross stated that there are many rock outcroppings on the property and there is no guarantee that the lots could be developed and wondered is the septic systems would fit on the proposed lots. Mr. Robinson stated that perhaps the applicant would like to continue the application until septic tests could be completed. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS None. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Ms. Martha Hooker then made the motion to deny the request. Motion carried 4-0. Mr. Witt was absent. F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report _lther Terrance Har 'ngt~ e etary 9~~~ Roanoke C my Planning Commission a~ STAFF REPORT PETITIONER: W.F. Walker CASE NUMBER: 7-3/2001 DATE: 02/22/2001 PARTI A. Summary The request is for a rezoning on a parcel of approximately 4.36 acres from AG-1 Agricultural/Rural Low Density to AR Agricultural Residential. The lot is located along the 1100 block of Skyview Road. The property is in the Catawba Magisterial District and the Masons Cove Community Planning Area. In the Community Plan, the property is designated as Neighborhood Conservation. Neighborhood Conservation areas by definition are where established single-family neighborhoods are delineated and the conservation of the existing development pattern is encouraged. The surrounding environs consist of a almost exclusively single-family residences, with some agricultural land in proximity. B. Description This is a request by W.F. Walker to rezone 4.36 acres of property located on Skyview Road. The applicant anticipates creating approximately 5 lots for development as single-family residences. The parcel is located in a mostly residential neighborhood close to Interstate 81 and along the Spring Hollow Reservoir northern water line loop. C. Applicable Regulations The proposed rezoning is from AG-1 Agricultural/Rural Low Density to AR Agricultural Residential. The applicant anticipates the creation of a small five-lot single-family subdivision. The following requirements are applicable: A subdivision plat, reviewed and approved by County Staff, in accordance with the County Land Development Procedures, will be required. Lot size and other performance standards for the AR Zoning District, as set forth in Section 30-34 of the Zoning Ordinance, must be met. PART II A. Analysis of Existing Conditions Use The property is currently used as a residence. Location The property is located in the Catawba Magisterial District and the Masons Cove Community Planning Area, on Skyview Road, approximately 1500 from feet Interstate 81. The northern end of the Skycoe Drive loop intersects with the lot. It is approximately 2000 feet from the intersection of Skyview and Weaver Roads. Lot The lot is 4.36 acres in area. It has frontage on two separate sections of Skyview Road. The first is approximately 160 feet before Skyview takes a sharp 180 degree turn. The other portion, which comprises most of the lot's frontage, is just past this turn and is approximately 705 feet. The lot itself has a gradual decline coming back from the road, about 70-90 feet, then drops off significantly from there, with a drop in elevation between 80-140 feet. There is currently an older barn and log house on the property. The owner has stated that the barn and house will be removed if the rezoning is approved. The lot is fairly wooded, and presents the opportunity for some spectacular vistas of Salem and the Roanoke Valley. Access Access to the property is from Skyview Road. The majority of the street frontage is just above a very sharp 180 degree turn in the road, limiting visibility somewhat. However, traffic speed is minimal in order to complete the turn. Surrounding Neighborhood Adjacent land uses consist of single family residences and vacant land, and public utilities. Heading up Skyview Road to the south of the property are several vacant tots and single family residences. Tax Parcel 45.03-1-22 and 26, and Parcel 45.03-2-22 all have single family residences. Parcel 45.03-1-25 is vacant. To the east of the property is a single family residence. To the north directly across the street is a vacant lot and a utilities lot. The utilities lot is a fairly new (within the last year) water pump station for the Roanoke County water system. There are also several other residential lots to the north. To the west of the property is a vacant 10 acre parcel. It is important to note that on most of the developed lots in the area, trees were conserved instead of merely leveling the land and placing houses. Zonino The property is zoned AG-1 Agricultural Rural Low Density. All properties in close proximity are zoned the same. There is a small pocket of R-1 Low Density Residential a about 2000 feet from the property, to the west of the Skyview/Weaver Roads intersection. This site was rezoned to R-1 Residential at the request of the property owner in December of 1997, but was never platted for development. B. Analysis of Proposed Development Property Characteristics The lot has significant street frontage, on two portions of Skyiew Road. The lot itself has a gradual decline coming back from the road, about 70-90 feet, then drops off significantly from there, with a drop in elevation between 80-140 feet. With the available public water system, the minimum required lot size in the AR zoning district is 30,000 square feet, and minimum required street frontage is per lot is 110 feet. All 5 proposed lots appear to meet the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. Access/Traffic Generation VDOT has expressed concerns over sight distance and width of the right-of-way for the proposed project. The engineer has recommended that the number of entrances in the development be limited to between 1 to 3 for the proposed lots. He has also commented that the right-of-way width appears to be 30 feet, and recommends the dedication of additional right-of--way to make it 25 feet wide from the center line. However, given the topography of the property, with a shallow "buildable area", and the steep slope towards the rear, creating entrances to serve more than one dwelling unit may not be feasible. Additionally, the dedication of 10 extra feet may make it difficult to place structures on any of the lots and still meet the 30 foot setback requirements. Fire & Rescue: The level of service currently for the Skyview Drive neighborhoods will not be negatively affected by the proposed development, according to the Fire and Rescue Department Drainage/Floodplain: No stormwater management plan has been submitted. In the future a plan may have to be submitted to the Engineering staff for review/approval. The property is not located in a floodplain district. Screening & Bufferina: With the anticipated single family residential uses, no screening and buffering will be required. Water/Sewer: Public water is available to this site. There is a fairly new 114,000 gallon water tank at the top of Skyview Drive that helps to service these neighborhoods. There is a pump station across from the property as a part of the system. The Spring Hollow Reservoir North Loop water line is in close proximity to this neighborhood. C. Conformance with the Community Plan This property is designated neighborhood Conservation in the 1998 Community Plan. Areas designated as such, according to the Plan, are future land use areas where established single-family neighborhoods are delineated and the conservation of the existing development pattern is encouraged. Favorable land use types include single-family residential at a reasonable density that is not significantly higher than the existing neighborhood, neighborhood institutional centers and neighborhood commercial. The Plan also defines land use determinants conducive to development areas. Positive land use determinants include: a location with limited density residential subdivisions exist; a location where the expansion of the existing development pattern is logical; an infill area which compliment the surrounding development pattern; service by a local street system and urban services; and a location where limited residential zoning has been established. Overall, the proposed rezoning appears to be in general conformance with the Community Plan. D. Conformance with County Development Standard The proposed project, as reflected in the concept plan, appears to comply with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. This is dependent ultimately on the submitted subdivision plat. Review and approval of the subdivision will be required as set forth in the Land Development Procedures. PART I I I Staff Conclusions This property is designated as Neighborhood Conservation in the Community Plan. Single-family neighborhoods and conservation of the existing development pattern are encouraged. Recent public facilities projects in the area indicate capacity for additional growth in the neighborhood. The characteristics of the right-of-way create some minor development constraints. Topography of the property limits the placement of structures, but provides the opportunity for high quality buildable homesites. Staff feels that approval of the proposed rezoning application will be in general conformance with the Community Plan and Zoning Ordinance. County'of Roanoke Community Development Planning & Zoning 5204 Bernard Drive P O Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 772-2108 Fir Staff Use only Date received: Receiv d b ~' ~~ ~ Application fee: Gr.~ f~~/BZ date: Placards issued: ~OS°date:~ ~ ~' 1 ?. `~ ) rc1~21 ~,'~ ~ _.. Case Number ~ ..)<.~ ~ir__.. ~; -7 ~- r.a,~ /,~ ALL APPLICANTS Check type of application filed (check all that apply) Rezoning ~ Special Use O Variance Applicants name/address w/zip ~ . f': l~l ~° f~~c~~' Phone•-~%`~~' ` ~.-+~S'~~ ~~ ~ ~G-..,/f. '1`.~~ ,~~',~~9.,.a;;~ .'Vi`i .~ ~'~ Fax No. Owner's name/address w/zip ~~- ,~, ~-~1/j/.~k'c:-~ Phone: t~~}. ~~ ~~ ~j^,~' f ,~-vl ~,~' ~"Z~ ~G/i9 ;~~ ~i Y~} Fax No. Property Location .~~i,f'c,,a~i".7 f~lC~.-J~= .~ Magisterial District: ' fr. ~-,,~~' , i P '~ ~ /c,,,,~ ~?~!~ lann ng area: r Community ~~ ~j e>~,°~ Cvva:"rvo.~~~ Tax a No.: p s~ % - ,~ - ;;~ ~ Existing Zoning: r> - Size of parcel(s): Acres: ~ r-'-. (~ / Existing Land Use: REZONIl~'GA.'VD SPECIAL USE PEI,?il~7IT_gPPLZCA~'~'TS (R/S) Proposed Zoning: l ~ ~ ~ I'~ Proposed Land Use: ~5c Z~, ~ I Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes ~ No O IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes ~ No O IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUII2ED FIRST J If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes 0 No VARIANCE APPLICANTS (V) ;, ' .. Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WII.L NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ~, `'~~ ~,.. v v ~.~ i ~v ~' Consultation 8 1!2" x 11 " concept plan ~ ~ Application fee ~% Application Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable ~<% ~G Justification Water and sewer application ~~ otmng property owners ~'` ~ P"hereby certify that I am either the owner of the property or the owner s agent or contract purchaser and am acting e nowledge and consent of the owner. Owner s Signature r-a JfJSTIFICATTON FOR:' REZONING OR:SP.ECIAL USE,PERIVIIT REQUEST Applicant William F. Walker/ Ann R. Walker The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfaze. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. ~' Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. I purpose to remove 1 single Jewelling from property and add 5 new single family houses. The five new residences will be more attracti e to the community, it will add economic development to Roanoke Count , and increase the present tax base by over ten times. We will also m k use of the new water line installed along the property. The construct ion will have only a small enviormental impact on the area. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. The Roanoke County Community Plan has this area under neii~l~borhood conservation. Zoning from A to AR will comply with single family residental land use set forth by this plan. The expansion of this area is within the density and logical develpoment pattern for new single family residents. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including waterJsewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. Very little enviormental impact will result from construction. The largest impact will be from instalt~t.~,n of the septic system. There will be no impact on the neighboring properties. e T- ~ .. ~ -' ~= 7G C ~ ~ ~ J c, ~ ""~ ~ Q 7CJ c' . ~:n :'~ J. -. y .-3 ;x7 ~J' ~ j} ~ i'~ m ~ ~, ,~ '"' ~ c- ~ err 3~ .. u T ST T; ,:y ' J ~~^ a r ~,~'~ ~~ ~ ('g ~ 'L ~ 4J ~ C'P' ~ h-+ C: :+t ^J ~'' ~ ~ ~~'~ R~ ~ ti. Ctt `" 1"7 r X R' [" T ~ ^x~ y.: V~ ...i :.7 V Ti ~ r ''r t rr: '*? ~,~ ~j'~ d / +~ ~~,, ~ , ~ " ~ `ti ~ '~' ~ j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -- '~' rye ~ _.~ ~= ~~ ~ 1 ,~~~~_~ .~~ N ~. ~ ~~ • " M1i l P 1 I ~~ , ~ ~ 1 L` ~ °0c ~ 1 ~• 9 I_~ ~~\. 1 G r ~ ~ `~ ~ n~ ~.~ ~. v', ~~ ~9 1 ~i ~~$ I ~_ ~ 4 # .~.. ~~ j ~. -,. ,• ~ ,l °~ J ~~~~~ ` i ~f w;~ ,~ ~i %aa ~' ~' /", T m ~ ,.'y i/ f ~~ i ~ ' ~ ~,~' ~'~ / ~ _ w~' ' ,~,~ ~~ . s ' ~b n M ~ ~ z ~~~ ~',', '" A7 „y ~ I ' S f~ ~ ; ~ ~1 `lY r ---- . ~ _ ~~~.~ ~r. _._ . ~y ~~ ,. ,~ ~"`~ .4~'~~'G~+N l~4`A/J~jrlt;G'~j,, 1fV~OrfA(~ild}i ~~ ~, ~.~, .'~'G ~~ ~?3 J ~\ ' ~S Najd,' ~ _~ ~ , ~ ~ p ~;,v S3 '~tti ~ ~ ~' •i ry c~ 5 !4 'T ~ ~ ti ~ ~ ~ ~. n c~, O ~lv 'o ~ ~ ~ '~~ '( ~~ ^'~ ~ y ~ ~ "~ rr r~~ ~.. •- r f-7 ;T7 ~ ~ -~-- ~ r ~,-„ 1 . 1 ~~' 1 ._,_ ~ ~ ~`~~(S) 4.36 Ac. I `,. .~? ~ , o ,..1 ~ __.._.____._ l ;.,:, ~ols~ ~ ,~ ~, 1.0 ~4c. ~~ N~~ ~4, ~ . •„y~ '~ 5 ' ~ ~J~ i',_'.~~ 12 .~ o ~ 255.5 N - 2 ~J . -~ ~ s ~ Ac. 6.72 ~ , :~~ Z,acs~ J ~ 5 ~.~ _ 18 . ,z., TyP.t .~r>. >35r~ ~ ~ . 1 .35 Ac. ~ ~t~ 3.44 Ac. D %~-~~ `~ :~ 1 ~ 3.04 Ac. C ~'~ , ~ n ' 14 . ;.~~ ~ - 2.24 Ac. > ,~; ~ `' _ <5~ cNn 1,;5'4 0 20 N cn 'Z~ .a... 4 T _. 3~i5 ROANOKE COUNTY Aplicants name: ~ F. yYalker DEPARTMENT OF Application: Rezoning from AG-1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT To Proposed Land Use: AR ` Tax Map No. 45.03-1-21 J FEB-17-2©O1 12:31 AM WM. F. WALKER 54© 721 1487 s~ ~ .• ~ I . v ~v-~ . s r~ SCHEpL`LE A BEGINIr~I'NG dt a point on thE'• north.erl,y right of way line of 5kyviow Read, 'said point being the point oP. interse_ction of tl~e g~~uthwesternmost corner af. th.e pareH,l. of Ni.t:a P. C'at:rol,:l (Tax Map $45.03-1-20; sec, Rcr~:;oke County bQed Hook g72, Pays' ?.0?) and the eoLltheaeternmoet point of the herein- ~aftez~ descr~,.bed pazcel of real property; thence with thc~ northerly right: of way line of 5kyview Road, 5. 65° 4"' 00" W. 1.35.37 feat to a poirti thence $. 37° 14' 00" W. 25.28 feet to an e~Ciating iron pins ther.c® leaving the right of way tv Skyvie~w Road,i.J.9°30' 00" W. 1.56.50 feet to a point, tl;e~nce S. 80° 30' 00" 4J. Z08.9C feet to an ex:i.sting iron pl,nj thenco 5. 2.2.° 57' :.2" W. 2ZU.59 feet ro ~' point; thcan;.e S. 80° 30' OU" W. 130. A9 feet to a points thence N. 4° ~0' 00" w. 2+8.00 fAat to a points thence N. 32° 26' 00" IV. 196.10 feet t,o a faints thence N, fl4° 36' 00" E. 510. BO fret to a. point; thoi.ce S . 86° 2S' 00" E. 21.10 foot to a p~~intT ther-ce S. 77° .l6' 00" E. 56.95 feet to a point; thence S. 70° 09' 00" E. 89.30 Poet to a point thene~: S. h0° 53' 00" E. 9f3.40 feet to an existing iron pin; thence S. 13° 40' 00" W. 193.96 feet t;o a point, being the p].acc~ of BEGIND~ING, consisting of 4.369 acres, u.a nhown on thatrertain plat prepared by Hufozd T. Lumgden & As~ocl.r~tes, P.L. , Engineers-8ur•~reyor~s, eased February 1?., 19:~~0; and DEINr, a pr~rtion of tha property conveyed unto George }3. Ph~.llips, :7r. and Virginia Welch Phillips, husband and wlfa, as tenants by the entireties with LhP rie~ht of sur- va.voxs}iip, by deed data8 March ].0, 1958, and of record in t11e Clerk' a Cff~.ce of the Circuit Court f.c~r the Country of I2r.~a.~okE~, Virginia, in Deed Bock 591, page 200, the said Gtorg~ ~. Phillips, Jr. having died nn May 1.. 1978, lc'av:ing Virgi..ni.a Welch phil~.ipe ae the fee simple owner. DEED ~~tat©Tpx 5.~~..~' Coun!y Tax 9_.~~ TraR:'Or (=acs ~...~G 1~'- Clerk's f ecs i..L~..lJ.~. 03t~ 5tata ~,.~fr~ 220 Loral ~.~('.~.tr..L2 Total i~/~•?D2 In 2ha Clark's Cltlice of the (;Inuit Cou±~ fox the C un.t~r of Roanahe, Va., this~day of ''!!"~lg,~this Instrumont was presented, anal with the certificab of ecknc~~uvledgment thoreto Waxed, sdmitted to record at~'''~' o'slotk ~M• The texas imposed by Par. 58.1~g41 ~ •lg02 of the a havd been paiCl. Ta~te• ~ Cie~k B~ ~ ~ ., - 'per CIPr~ ,,~~ 1 ~7.'r y~ lt~v ~; J ~ r.~r,.C ~' ~tia`t'^ ,~, .% ~ 1~~i'~/~ r'te' ~ ~ !, ~'°' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MARCH 27, 2001 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 4.369-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 1114 SKYVIEW ROAD (ROUTE 755), (TAX MAP NO. 45.03-1-21), IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF AG-1, AGRICULTURAL/RURAL LOW DENSITY, TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF AR, AGRICULTURAL RESIDENTIAL, UPON THE APPLICATION OF W. F. WALKER WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 27, 2001, and the second reading and public hearing were held March 27, 2001; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 6, 2001; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 4.369 acres, as described herein, and located at 1114 Skyview Road, (Route 755), (Tax Map Number 45.03-1-21) in the Catawba Magisterial District and the Masons Cove Community Planning Area, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of AG-1, Agriculture/Rural Low Density District, to the zoning classification of AR, Agriculture Residential District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of W. F. Walker. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the northerly right of way line of Skyview Road, said point being the point of intersection of the southwesternmost corner of the parcel of Nita P. Carroll (Tax Map #45.03-1-20); see Roanoke County Deed Book 872, page 207) and the southeasternmost point of the hereinafter described parcel of real property; thence with the northerly right of way line of Skyview Road, S. 65° 47' 00" W. 135.37 feet to a point; thence S. 37° 14' 00" W. 25.28 feet to an existing iron pin; thence leaving the right of way to Skyview Road, N. 9° 30' 00" W. 156.50 feet to a point; thence S. 80° 30' 00" W. 208.90 feet to an existing iron pin; thence S. 22° 57' S2" W. 220.59 feet to a point; thence S. 80° 30' 00" W. 130.49 feet to a point; thence N. 4° G:\ATTORNEY\mvw\Board\walker.rez.frm 1 r-~ 20' 00" W. 248.00 feet to a point; thence N. 32° 26' 00" W. 196.10 feet to a point; thence N. 84° 36' 00" E. 510.80 feet to a point; thence S. 86° 25' 00" E. 21.10 feet to a point; thence S. 77° 16' 00" E. 56.95 feet to a point; thence S. 70° 09' 00" E. 89.30 feet to a point; thence S. 60° 53' 00" E. 98.40 feet to an existing iron pin; thence S. 13° 40' 00" W. 193.86 feet to a point, being the place of BEGINNING, consisting of 4.369 acres, as shown on that certain plat prepared by Buford T. Lumsden & Associates, P.C., Engineers-Surveyors, dated February 12, 1990; 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force'and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. G:ATTORNEY\mvw\Board\walker.rez.fi~m 2 r .~-- , -3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 27, 2001 ORDINANCE 032701-15 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO MARC I. WILSON TO OPERATE AN AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIP, USED, TO BE LOCATED AT 3328 PETERS CREEK ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 37.14-1-7), CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Marc I. Wilson has filed a petition for a special use permit to operate an Automobile Dealership, Used, to be located at 3328 Peters Creek Road (Tax Map No. 37.14-1-7) in the Catawba Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matteron March 6, 2001; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matteron February 27, 2001; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on March 27, 2001. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Marc I. Wilson to operate an Automobile Dealership, Used, to be located at 3328 Peters Creek Road (Tax Map No. 37.14-1-7) in the Catawba Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 2000 Community Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.2-2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved with the following conditions: (a) Used Automobile Dealership shall be allowed only as an accessory use to Minor Automobile Repair. (b) No more than 5 vehicles shall be displayed for sale at any one time. 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Church to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Terry Harrington, County Planner William E. Driver, Director, Real Estate Valuation Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 2 ROANOKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Applicant's Name: Marc I. i~ilson Zoninq: Special Use C-2 Tax Map No. 37.14-1-7 PETITIONER: Marc I. Wilson CASE NUMBER: 8-3/2001 ~"' Planning Commission Hearing Date: March 6, 2001 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: March 27, 2001 A. REQUEST The petition of Marc I. Wilson to obtain a Special Use Permit to operate an Automobile Dealership, Used on 1.4088 acres located at 3328 Peters Creek Road, Catawba Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS No citizens spoke. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION Mr. David Holladay presented the staff report. Ms. Hooker asked how an accessory use is defined. Mr. Holladay responded that an accessory use was clearly incidental and subordinate to the principal land use. Mr. Robinson asked for verification that the proposed used automobile dealership would not change the existing use. D. CONDITIONS • Used Automobile Dealership shall be allowed only as an accessory use to Minor Automobile Repair. • No more than five (5) vehicles shall be displayed for sale at any one time. E. COMMISSION ACTION(Sj Ms. Martha Hooker made a motion to approve the request with the conditions. Motion carried 4-0. Mr. Witt was absent. F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report _ Other `~ -~-,-, Terrance~H~arriii~ Secretary g Roanoke County Planning Commission T-3 County of Roanoke Department of Community Development Memorandum To: Planning Commission From: David Holladay, Planner Date: February 19, 2001 Re: Marc Wilson, Special Use Permit for Used Automobile Dealership Marc Wilson is applying for a Special Use Permit for a Used Automobile Dealership at his business, the Sports Car Clinic. The site is located at 3328 Peters Creek Road, in the Catawba Magisterial District. Mr. Wilson plans to offer a very limited number of automobiles for sale, with no more than two or three vehicles for sale on the lot at any time. The used automobiles are marketed to and bought from the petitioner's customer service base. The auto sales would be accessory and incidental to the primary use as specialty auto repair. Currently Mr. Wilson holds a Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) license to sell used vehicles at his Christiansburg location. According to Mr. Wilson, used auto sales at the Christiansburg Sports Car Clinic average about 10 vehicles per year. Mr. Wilson plans the same level of sales in Roanoke. Most vehicles would be displayed in an indoor showroom, in the lobby of the Sports Car Clinic. Occasionally, one or two vehicles would be displayed outside, on a front patio, or in the parking area. The existing customer parking area would not be displaced by a vehicle display area. Prior to constructing the Sports Car Clinic in 1997, Mr. Wilson rezoned the property from R1 to C2C, with the following condition: "No junk vehicles will be stored outside". The site was developed according to Roanoke County standards. The proposed use would not change the site, or impact local traffic, or adjacent properties. The petitioner supports a condition that limits the used auto sales as an accessory use to the current auto repair business. Staff suggests that the Planning Commission consider the following conditions for the Special Use Permit: Used Automobile Dealership shall be allowed only as an accessory use to Minor Automobile Repair. 2. No more than five (5) vehicles shall be displayed for sale at any one time. County of Roanoke Community Development Planning & Zoning 5204 Bernard Drive P ~ BOX 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 772-2108 Fnr Staff Ilse (~nlv T- 3 Date received: Received by: i~2~t~- T.N. Application fee: PC/BZA date: ta0. p0 3IG~~01 Placards issued: ? ~i r~r BOS date: 1 ~j1~G ~~0~ ~ ~ Case Number ~ - 3 ~ ~ ~O 1 ALL APPLICANTS Check type of application filed (check all that apply) Rezoning Special Use ~:=•'''~ Variance Applicants name/address w/zip Phone: 540-563-1133 Marc I. Wilson 5001 Glenvar Hts. Blvd Salem, Va. 24153 Fax No: 540-265-1470 Owner=s name/address w/zip Phone_540-563-1133 Marc I. Wilson and Curtis S. Sheets 5001 Glenvar Hts. Blvd Salem, Va. 24153 Fax No. 540-265-1470 Property Location Magisterial District: ~~~Il/~1~5 < ,.~:z ~ _ The Sportscar Clinic 3328 Peters Creek Rd. Roanoke, Va. 24019 Community Planning area: I '~ ,f ~ , s ~-?- - ~~ ~rn_ z3 Tax Map No.: 37.14-1-~' ~' ,,~ _ $, Existing Zoning: C-2 Size of parcel(s): Acres: 1.4088 ac. Existing Land Use: Automobile service REZONING AND SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANTS (R/S) Proposed Zoning: C-2 > ~- ~" Proposed Land Use: Automobile ser-v-iee-end-sales pf' ~ _ -: .. Does the~arcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes ~' No IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes :.%'''y No IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIR5T If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes No VARIANCE APPLICANTS (V) Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESI; ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. R/S V R/S V R/S V Consultation 8 1/2" x 11" concept plan Application Metes and bounds description Justification Water and sewer application I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the property or the owner=s agent or contract purct consent of the owner. }~ "i / S Application fee Proffers, if applicable Adjoining property owners r and am acting with the knowledge and Owner=s Signature ~3 JUSTIFICATION FOR REZOMNG OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST Applicant Marc I. The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. The Sportscar Clinic has been serving the Roanoke valley for over 24 years from its two locations in Roanoke and Christiansburg. It has been a licensed used car dealer from its Christiansburg location for over 13 years. The Sportscar Clinic does not engage in volume sales to the general public but instead focuses on sales to and from its customer base for service. Car sales is considered an accessory business and provided as a complementary service to current service customers. It is The Sportscar Clinic's desire to be able to provide [his service to Its Roanoke customers as well. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. Given the type and quality of the cars serviced by the Sportscar Clinic, automobiles offered for sale will also be of late model and high quality since we market primarily to our current customer base. In 13 years, we have averaged only 10 cars per year at our Christiansburg location and intend no more in Roanoke. We would generally offer only 1 or 2 cars for sale at a time. In keeping with our image as a high quality service center, All cars offered for sale would be tastefully presented and often presented only in our show room. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. No impact on any public services would be expected. Given the type and number of automobiles offered for sale at any time' only a minimal impact of a positive nature would be expected on the community at large. The property currently exceeds all' DMV requirements for a sales license. Since ample parking and attractive landscaping is already in place, no impact on the ~' current site is expected. M Y W O N~ 5 L ~ ~ ~Z °~ o w ~n Nrr w~p `nom aF a p Y Q Z Z f r o N W U p~ y U S ~ W ~ ° rn O F O o a w F~ W{W~~Z w\ ° WS,,,' ~~X Sp ~a4 aN !n ~ r D = W } ~ ~ w ~ Or K m ~~ O~ G~ Z ~ O WO O N m O K~ ~ U 2 ~N ~ w ~~ O Q O Z Z a < W I ~QW a ° ~ Or ~ ~ N D Q d' ~ O r m w g O N~ W O ~mQ~OZ~0~~4.w~~?~~Q OS C7 Zoe ~Z8~~9 (OO ~~~~aa..~U ~ N~ Z<ZWmoJH?wW~Zra ZW ZFZV_i 7Z.-.Nw W`nN~~r Z~~N~~F6~, ~<=0ya'a0~p2 ~ O a o~ U? Z U r~$ O Z pJ Q m<~ W 6 g ~do$~OH°~~WNd~~F~w~`c~i'~m~ ~y ~~..//m p~~SwUF~p~,~~~~0"wpZw VUOUZZw-~~ ~ 6O-{{K0~ WS s~?~~~~v~i¢~o#°~za~arr~~ KKK\wWU~'~aY'~3awWma~K°2 ~~~owawa..ao~ao'nczz~~~i~-oo~zw ~~wnOOm~NOx==map=ac~Uw~ Fa~o~~Ina~i,.w rrN~z dai ci ~N r~vu]~t~ corn O ~ ~ L ~` ~ , ~ ~ E _i~ ~~ . ~ '~ ~' S ~882oa o~~ REi.`11P~Y ~~ ~, ~~ I ~.+ n Q ~ ~za~ M O =np z}^N F"o wcn (7 C7 ~a o~ ~m 3 O O d :~J ~~. _~ ..Y ~~ ~~ ~.,, ~ rJ x ~~ 2 a ~ tln ~:~. W m~ r> ate,' ._. oat ~ NN O ~L ~'~, ~ ti.r ~ II w~2 j K~ N ~-~~'l-. .~`~i°. add 4 U a a~ N Q ~_ ~ 0~ d N^ N -~O r ~ Q U^ ~~;,W ~: ~O 1il P O DO!na p OfNO< `~,jj }~- ~anN ~W H 2ZZVt ~''- p - G r ~^(W ~. ~7M~~ Q~ W (x W ~Wm ti~~~ O~ r2~ .-NMw ~H Z NW ~ ~J~ J S~1 J ~w.. _ Q 40~ 3 ~ "'~ ~~a ~.. i~7 $ o a ~ ~ . '~Mn C~i7 ~ ~~' I N~~~ma~r ~ O i~~ I `nn~n~a z N a nO~~cjNN (n d Q. tp ~ N to N v ? Z ~ I~ \ ~ ~ ~ II II tl 11 11 II N c ~ C r U \~,,r © z ~~ o]NY ~j~ R ! '~ ~° o ~ o~~~Q~ ~ pp ~~N~f ~~;;,~ J' C2 , `~`\ ~' ~ NUJ, vl]vcO tAN a ila rn ` \ \\ ~'~.t~c a J ~~ ma ~ ii ~~ ~ i z~ a ~~.= ~~ ~ ~ a= ' ~ Z~ ~ ~ ~ a0 V ~ ~~~NNi~ ~~ J\ /~ U ~ QQ ~ ~~OO~OW N~ j+' .-{ N~1^N~V1 {~ UC~/!JU C` ~I N C' _ ill ~~ ' ~y ~ ~ ~ ii \ ~ a \ ~ '~''. wma m aQ \ ~. rya ~ l 4 ~~ m ~ ~ M g ~~ `~ .~ g~ ~ ra Z~ ~ oo" W ~ w r ~ ,,. ' Y W I ` 1 N ° ~ 3W ti ~°' ^FC~ a ~ ~ w p N' W °Y'oZ Z p ~ 1 U Q~ r F- a 3 W N w ~ Z O ~ r ~ ~ ~ ° w ? O N ~ X a w II II II U W wZ 0 z W 0 W ~ o W W C7 a Z U 9 ~ ~ ~ m ~ 3 N c~ c~ c~ c~ z z z z N N N N X >C X X W W W W a ~ o j V r ^ Q 00 mN U o W Q '~ Z O M O U ^ oz aw ~ U ~~ U ~9~ C11 ~~ N e .o ~s 9~ ~ •£S' ~ L"'~ m ,~ ~w I W ° 1 .f Q I I Qv.- U O~ v ~w O 'Z L ' ~ 4 1 ~ a n ~ I ~ z ~ N . r ;,; o=no ^ Z z W I a N } FxQ- ~ O U ~~ w ~ ~~ 3 00 ,90B11 ~-- M .9L,44.S1 K ~ UU 9g ~~ o<Z` g0 ^ Z U ~ > I~ p M W Q W J d' Z Z O Q= xar ~r~ rn 73 ROANOKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Applicant's Name: Marc I. Wilson Zoning: Special Uae C-2 Tax Map No. 37. > 4-1-7 r . ~:t.-.. N.e.., ,. ~j 1 1 .. t ~ `I ~ ~ . .,~ ~~_ k ~.. x k i ~~ ~ ;; i 7T 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 27, 2001 ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO MARC I. WILSON TO OPERATE AN AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIP, USED, TO BE LOCATED AT 3328 PETERS CREEK ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 37.14-1-7), CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Marc I. Wilson has filed a petition for a special use permit to operate an Automobile Dealership, Used, to be located at 3328 Peters Creek Road (Tax Map No. 37.14-1-7) in the Catawba Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 6, 2001; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on February 27, 2001; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on March 27, 2001. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED bythe Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Marc I. Wilson to operate an Automobile Dealership, Used, to be located at 3328 Peters Creek Road (Tax Map No. 37.14-1-7) in the Catawba Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 2000 Community Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.2-2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved with the following conditions: (a) Used Automobile Dealership shall be allowed only as an accessory use to Minor Automobile Repair. (b) No more than 5 vehicles shall be displayed for sale at any one time. 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\ZONING\wilson.sup.wpd 1 ..,,,. ~ k AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 27, 2001 ORDINANCE 032701-16 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO LARRY E. HUFFMAN FOR A PRIVATE STABLE ON 13.4 ACRES OF LAND WITH A PROPOSED ACCESS IN THE 1400 BLOCK OF CARLOS DRIVE (TAX MAP NO. 39.01-1-1 ), HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Larry E. Huffman has filed a petition for a special use permit for a private stable with frontage in the 1400 block of Carlos Drive (Tax Map No. 39.01-1-1) in the Hollins Community Planning Area and in the Hollins Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matteron March 6, 2001; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matteron February 27, 2001; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on March 27, 2001. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Larry E. Huffman for a private stable to be located on 13.4 acres of land with a proposed access in the 1400 block of Carlos Drive (Tax Map No. 39.01-1-1) in the Hollins Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 2000 Community Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.2-2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved with the following conditions: (1) There shall be a maximum of four (4) horses allowed on the property. (2) All animal grazing areas shall have sufficient ground coverto minimize stormwater runoff and erosion and the land shall not be denuded. (3) The site shall be developed in substantial conformity to the site plan titled Larry Huffman Private Stable dated January 25, 2001, with specific regard to the barn setback distances. 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: 7''Yt-.r.~..~..gj- r"~ . Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Terry Harrington, County Planner William E. Driver, Director, Real Estate Valuation Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 2 '39.05 JO' ROANOKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Applicant's Name: Larry E. Huffman Zoning: Special Use R-1 Tax Map No. 39.01-1-1 PETITIONER: Larry E. Huffman ~.~ ~~/ CASE NUMBER: 9-3/2001 Planning Commission Hearing Date: March S, 2001 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: March 27, 2001 A. REQUEST The petition of Larry E. Huffman to obtain a Special Use Permit for a private stable, on 13.4 acres of land, zoned R-1, located with a proposed access in the 1400 block of Carlos Drive in the Hollins Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS No citizens spoke. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION Mr. John Murphy presented the staff report. Mr. Ross inquired if there any concerns from adjoining neighbors. Mr. Robinson asked about VDOT requiring a commercial entrance. Ms. Hooker inquired about the number of horses. There was general discussion about the management of animal waste. Mr. Ross discussed with the applicant the proposed number of horses. Mr. Huffman responded possibly four (4) or five (5). D. CONDITIONS 1. There shall be a maximum of four (4) horses allowed on the property. 2. All animal-grazing areas shall have sufficient ground cover to minimize stormwater runoff and erosion and the land shall not be denuded. 3. The site shall be developed in substantial conformity to the site plan titled Larry Huffman Private Stable dated January 25, 2001, with specific regard to the barn setback distances. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Todd Ross made a motion to approve the request with the conditions. Motion carried 4-0. Mr. Witt was absent. F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report _ Other ~~,'~~~ Terrance F~arrm on, Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commission ~= y STAFF REPORT PETITIONER: Larry E. Huffman PREPARED BY: John Murphy CASE NUMBER: 9-3/2001 DATE: PART I A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY March 6, 2001 This petition is a request for a Special Use Permit to construct and maintain a private stable on a 13.40-acre, R-1 zoned parcel. The subject property has frontage in the 1400 block of Carlos Drive and is in the Hollins Community Planning Area and Hollins Magisterial District. B. DESCRIPTION This petition is a request from the contract purchaser for a Special Use Permit to construct and maintain a private stable within the R-1 zoning district. The property is 13.40 acres and is located in the 1400 block of Carlos Drive. The property is designated as Development in the 1998 Roanoke County Community Plan. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance defines a Private Stable as: The keeping, breeding, or raising of horse or ponies exclusively for the personal use and enjoyment of the owner or occupant of the property or the riding of horses or ponies by the owner or occupant of the property and their guests. A private stable is permitted in the R-1 zoning district with the approval of a Special Use Permit. Section 30-81-5 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance requires compliance with the following Use and Design Standards for a private stable in the R-1 zoning district: 1. Minimum lot size: Two (2) acres. 2. On lots of less than five (5) acres, no more than one stable animal per acre shall be permitted. 3. Stables and corrals shall comply with all the setback requirements for accessory buildings. 4. Stables shall properly manage animal waste in order to prevent a nuisance or health hazard to adjoining or nearby property owners. A VDOT entrance permit will be required. A building and zoning permit shall be required for the construction of all structures on the property. PART II A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Location -The property is located with road frontage along the 1400 block of Carlos Drive ~'= y (State Route 616) in the Hollins Magisterial District. Carlos Drive is situated between Hollins Road and Old Mountain Road near the base of Read Mountain. Topoeraph.~getation -The property generally has the appearance of a valley between the frontage parcels along the length of Carlos Drive and the lots at the cul-de-sac of Nell Circle. The land slopes from the east down to the western side adjoining the railroad right of way. The site is thick with mature trees with minimal undergrowth. Surrounding_Neig_hborhood -All of the adjoining parcels are zoned R-1, most of the parcels have single-family houses. One of the parcels across Carlos Drive near the southeastern side of the subject parcel currently has a pasture area for horses. The railroad right of way adjoins on the western side of the property. B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Layout/Architecture -The applicant's concept plan shows asingle-family structure near the southeast side of the property, near the Carlos Drive frontage. The barn is shown generally centered on the property. The property has a chain link fence along the perimeter. Access /Traffic Circulation -The application did not indicate the access point on the concept plan. Access will be regulated by VDOT as part of the entrance permit process. Fire & Rescue/iJtilities -The Utility Department indicates that public water and sewer can be made available to the site with adequate easements. There is no impact on fire and rescue services. C. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY COMMUNITY PLAN The subject property is designated as Development in the 1998 Roanoke County Community Plan. These areas of new development have the most opportunity for innovative land development practices. Cluster developments with a mix of housing types and densities, limited retail support, and efficient layout of streets can prevent sprawl and create self-contained neighborhoods with combined living and working areas. The protection and inclusion of environmental processes and natural site amenities, such as drainage systems and vegetation, should be priorities for all new developments. D. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A building permit, entrance permit, an approved water source and approved sanitary sewer system shall be required. PART III A. STAFF CONCLUSIONS The construction of one (1)single-family house and a private stable does not conflict with the Development designation in the Community Plan. The overall goals of the Development designated areas are for clustered housing and the preservation of natural site amenities. The property maybe developed at this stage for the proposed use and not preclude future development plans. Should the Planning Commission choose to support this Special Use Permit request, staff recommends the following conditions: ~y 1. There shall be a maximum of one (1) horse per acre maintained on the property housing the private stable. 2. All animal-grazing areas shall have sufficient ground cover to minimize stormwater runoff and erosion and the land shall not be denuded. County of Roanoke Community Development Planning & Zoning 5204 Bernard Drive P O Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 772-2108 Fnr Staff Use Only ceived: Date re Received by: ~ t Applicaripn fee: PC;BZA date: Placards issued: BQS dace: Case dumber ~' ~J 2dd ALL .APPLICANTS Check type of application filed (check all that apply) 0 Rezoning ~ Special Use O Variance Applicants name/address w/zip ~'„ Phone• ,S ~ ~ ~; `{~ ~ /~G~~c `• t~,,,x;.~-~- C~t~7G'c,ccc'C '~ ~ ' 2 1' - ~ - ~ J~r2ti Fax No. ~ ~ ~~ ~z C; ~ e ~. s~ ~ Owner's name/address w/zip Phone: ~~ ~~ /~ ~~~ -~ /~ ~'~ ~1 ~~-~ 1 ~l ~ ~v J z ~~ Va '~ ~' ~-,~~~ ~ Fax No. s ~ t on y Locat i Prop er t //~ Magisterial District: ~~~: ~ t ~`~ (r _ f j } ' Community Planning area: (--~~, ~ 1;,~,~~, Tax Nlap No.: .-,. c ~ i -- (- ( ~ t - Existin Zonin g g~ ~.- ~ Size of parcel(s): Acres: 1 ~ - C~ ,~.c; Existing Land Use: ~ j~ ~ ~ R~'~ONING ANL7 SPECIAL USE PERMZT APPLICANTS (R/S) Proposed Zoning: ~ - l , %+' ~ ~ ~ j~~' ~` ° { `` `' ~` ~' l~, Proposed Land Use: ~ ~,;~ ' `~ i ~~ ,p, v~-1-~ ~~~(.~,-(~ 1~ Does th~parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes ~ No 0 IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. , Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes ~ No ~ IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIlZED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes ~ No O V,~I2IANCE .-1PPLIC.9NTS (V) Variance of Section(s) \.. of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: ~ _.~. ~_~ Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF TIIESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. / V R V R/ V Consultation 8 1/2" x 11" concept plan /~ Application fee v ~ Application ~-' Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable ~ Justitication Water and sewer application ~ Adjoining property owners I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner. i ~, { ° ~ ~. ~ '~; ,- ~ i ~ r ~ i ; ~^„~ Owner's Signature '• ..,,.~ _ _ ~j ~ ___ _.. - a __,_ l /' """"j' ~C,~ w L: , ,arxr ! 4A , ' . ~ ""' ' 39.05 ts.4o b „ ~ JO' 9 1s.o7 b 42. 7.4 tss b 43 sse, 1.ei b 'd 41. ! ~ t.ao b Q J~J ~v 39c ' 2 aexr s - rum 7. 40. s.oo o) t.ee b(c) t.si b t.o4 b 39. 3. 5~~ 'at ~ t.te b 1.42 b q R 3:4 rr c 31. ~ ;six s 32. 9. 3.3 t.7s b ,,tt 1 33. d 1.4 b 11 1 00 b 1.04 b a„~zr 274 b ~~ Abe(()) 7 ~ . t. . 0 Ao(C) 3 2 s,~ 0°j _v ~ ors . ~ 30' t.e4 b ,..~ 7.2 Caro t.0e b ~ 29. ~c 3.1 ~ t.47 b 1.41b :,~. - ~~ 9!~sa 7.3 ~ t ~, _ . 1.07 b 10. ~ + ar 1e.e6 b 27• 4. ,xx 8 ~ b t.~e o.eatp c ,.>a b 26. axz _26, 1.06 b. ~ ax, , ~- ~ - ~ t! riva a ,_ ' --- 5. 12te b ~° s.~ ' 12, 21. 1.ai b 24 .~ a 20. ~ ~' 13. R " ~ .,, ,~ 17. se.n b 4.e6 b ra00 ROANOKE COUNTY Applicant's Name: Larry E. Huffman DEPARTMENT OF Zoning: Special Use R-1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tax Map No. 39.01-1-1 v~ ~.`~C s o \.~ ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 27, 2001 ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO LARRY E. HUFFMAN FOR A PRIVATE STABLE ON 13.4 ACRES OF LAND WITH A PROPOSED ACCESS IN THE 1400 BLOCK OF CARLOS DRIVE (TAXMAP NO.39.01-1-1), HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Larry E. Huffman has filed a petition for a special use permit for a private stable with frontage in the 1400 block of Carlos Drive (Tax Map No. 39.01-1-1) in the Hollins Community Planning Area and in the Hollins Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 6, 2001; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on February 27, 2001; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on March 27, 2001. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Larry E. Huffman for a private stable to be located on 13.4 acres of land with a proposed access in the 1400 block of Carlos Drive (Tax Map No. 39.01-1-1) in the Hollins Magisterial District is substantially iri accord with the adopted 2000 Community Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.2-2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved with the following condition: (1) There shall be a maximum of four (4) horses allowed on the property. (2) All animal grazing areas shall have sufficient ground cover to minimize stormwater runoff and erosion and the land shall not be denuded. (3) The site shall be developed in substantial conformity to the site plan titled Larry Huffman Private Stable dated January 25, 2001, with specific regard to the barn setback distances. G:\ATTORNEY\mvw\Board\Huffman Special Use Permit.wpd 1 ~=v 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. G:\ATTORNEY\mvw\Board\Huffman Special Use Permit.wpd Z Lam/ } AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MARCH 27, 2001 ORDINANCE 032701-17 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 4.068-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF CAVE SPRING LAND AND OLD CAVE SPRING ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 76.20-9-1 TO 11) IN THE WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-3, WITH CONDITIONS, TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-3, WITH AMENDED CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF JEFFREY S. MARONIC WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 27, 2001, and the second reading and public hearing were held March 27, 2001; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 6, 2001; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Ordinance 102296-10 changed the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 4.068 acres, described herein, and located at the intersection of Cave Spring Lane and Old Cave Spring Road (Tax Map Numbers 76.20-9-1 through 12) in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, to the zoning classification of R-3, Medium-Density Multi-Family Residential District, with the following conditions: (1) The subject area will be developed in accordance with the approved plan of Farmington Place Subdivision, bearing revised date of 11/27/95, with the exception that: (a) The access easement across Lots 1 and 9 will be eliminated, and (b) Lots 9 and 10 will be served by the same private road currently serving Lots 11 and 12, and the storm water detention pond. 1 (2) The Homeowner's Association, which has been established to provide forthe maintenance of the private road serving Lots 11 and 12, and the storm water management area, will be responsible for the entire length of said roadway, as it serves Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12. (3) The proposed private road will not be built to state standards. (4) The proposed development will continue to be built to the same standards as the existing homes. They will be similar in quality and size as the existing homes, with a minimum square footage of 1,400 square feet. (5) The proposed road will not be extended, and will serve only Lots 9, 10, 11, 12, as said lots are designated on the Plat of Farmington Place dated September 8, 1995, and approved by Roanoke County on November 3, 1995. (6) The proposed road serving Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 is private and its maintenance, including snow removal, shall not be a public responsibility. It shall not be eligible for acceptance into the State Secondary System for maintenance until such time as it is constructed and otherwise complies with all requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation for the addition of subdivision streets current at the time of such request. Any costs required to cause this street to become eligible for addition to the State system shall be provided with funds other than those administered by the Virginia Department of Transportation. 2. That this action to amend Condition (5) above was taken upon the application of Jeffrey S. Maronic. 3. That the owner of the property voluntarily proffered in writing the following amended Condition (5) which is accepted by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia: (5) The private access road as shown on the approved plan for Farmington Place Subdivision revised 11 /27/95 shall only serve Roanoke County Tax Parcels 76.20-9- 8 through 11 and 76.20-3-6 and shall not be extended. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the westerly side of Old Cave Spring Road (Route 1663) 2 and the southerly side of Cave Spring Lane (Route 1652) as it intersects; thence with the westerly line of Old Cave Spring Road and with a curve to the left with a chord bearing and distance of S. 10 deg. 12' 00" W. 246.29 feet and an arc distance of 246.59 feet to a point; thence S. 05 deg. 21' 11" W. 111.38 feet to a point on the northerly line of property now or formerly of William Hancock (Tax No. 76.20-3-6); thence leaving Old Cave Spring Road and with Hancock line S. 80 deg. 15' 00" W. 359.02 feet to a post; thence S. 10 deg. 41' 21" E. 96.78 feet to a point; thence S. 72 deg. 04' 31" W. 50.39 feet to a point on the easterly line of property now or formerly of R. J. Birkenmaier (Tax No. 76.20-3-9); thence with the Birkenmaier line N. 32 deg. 00' 00" W. 293.56 feet to a point on the southerly line of property now or formerly of J. S. Maronic (Tax No. 76.20-3-8); thence with the Maronic line N. 78 deg. 20' 00" E. 52.30 feet to a point; thence N. 11 deg. 12' 30" W. 137.87 feet to a point on the southerly side of Cave Spring Lane (Route 1652); thence with Cave Spring Lane N. 79 deg. 47' 08" E. 89.54 feet to a point; thence N. 75 deg. 43' 30" E. 472.02 feet to a point; thence S. 84 deg. 18' 49" E. 23.53 feet to the point- and place of beginning, and containing 4.068 acres as shown on a survey for Jeffrey S. Maronic and Laura J. Maronic dated December 27, 1993 and made by Balzer & Associates, Engineers and Surveyors. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor McNamara to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: YyL.,cx .e.,~~.. ,~v~ ~t 0 Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Terry Harrington, County Planner William E. Driver, Director, Real Estate Valuation Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 3 .. ~ 1,~r. Y~ b+ i,~ ~~. .~- ~,4 4j s 12._ ~ a ~0 19~g'~11 ,~~ 4910 £ ~ F G 4970 ~ 4.. ~ ^°` g6.99 ' ga.45 150 O `~ a1.6g 50 14 00 13 8 >z 1 ~. a 4937 9' ~ ~ J '~ N . 4929_ ~ W _ ~ O 5007 rr~ ~ 75 1D3.65 9g •a5 Rt.1652 ~O ~1 ~~ ~ ~~ ~,.. .N 4909 7` 19Z~~ Ln SPritlg C~'~e 50 p 4„ ('~ ROANOKE COUNTY Applicant's Name: Jeffrey 5. Maronic, Inc. DEPARTMENT OF Zoning: Variance-Amend Proffers COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tax Map No. 76.20-9-1 to 11 T5 5.1 4506 1.28 Ac. 452[ 452E 21 84.8! . ~_ . ~ ~_5 PETITIONER: Jeffrey S. Maronic CASE NUMBER: 10-3/2001 Planning Commission Hearing Date: March 6, 2001 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: March 27, 2001 A. REQUEST The petition of Jeffrey S. Maronic to rezone 4.068 acres from R-3, Medium Density Residential with conditions to R-3 Medium Density Residential with amended conditions, property located at the inter-section of Cave Spring Lane and Old Cave Spring Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS Mr. Larles stated that he owns property to the south of the subject property. He said that he had concerns regarding noise level, additional houses and drainage off the property, but stated that the questions were resolved since only one new house was being put on the adjacent lot. He was worried about the sewer line which was broken during the development of the lots. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION Mr. David Tickner presented the staff report. Mr. Ross asked if all of the proffers should be revised to reflect the change. Mr. Harrington stated that he and Mr. Tickner felt that only the 5th proffer needed to be changed, and that he would verify this with the County Attorney. Mr. Robinson stated that he was impressed with the changes on the property as it was developed, and that it fits in well with the area. Mr. Thomason echoed his sentiments. D. CONDITIONS Mr. Thomason made a motion to approve the request with the conditions as stated. Motion carried 4-0. Mr. Witt was absent. The private access road as shown on the approved plan for Farmington Place Subdivision revised 11/27/95 shall only serve Roanoke County Tax Parcels 76.20=9- 8 through 11 and 76.20-3-6 and shall not be extended. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. AI Thomason made a motion to approve the request with the conditions. Motion carried 4-0. Mr. Witt was absent. F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report _ Other ~~~ ~ .~ ,~~ Terrance Hz~ringt ,Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commission T- 5 ~'_ County'of Roanoke Community Development Planning & Zoning, 5204 Bernard Drive P O Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 772-2108 For Staff Use Onlv Date recei ~ed: ~ ~ Received y: ,Application fe~~ ~~ 1 PC/B~ date: L~ Placards issued• ~ 2b Q ~ BOS date• ~I,.L l o Case Number f d - Z~ ~ ALL APPLICAl!'TS C3teck type of application filed (check all that apply) D -~- ~~~ ~.=~~~_~~ ~~ Rezoning Special Use ~ Variance "" Applicants name/address w/zip, Phone• 7 ~~ ~ ~ `~ 7 ( ~2 ~ ~~ r. ` (~c7X-~~ c.~ ~ ~Z Ct/fit~~ S~' ;,e,~,t- G,r`M.~€_, cC Fax No. 1t i Owner's name/address w/zip Phone: 7 7~; _ ~~ '~ ~.' 1 Fax No ~ ~7~"~ ~_ _. , ~_ ~ . Property Location (Lit?.f_---~-e~~-~t0i.~;:.;~;.rv_ MaQisterial District: n. ~~°''- ----w+--A=d~~~~',~Z'~,%~:~~-----.~° Community Planning area:,~`j;; ~~%~.>,-),_,rw Tax Map No.: ~ ,!"~---~-~ ., ~.. c, ~4 . Z - ~:=,~ ,.^ `~,., r~„~~ ~w ~ i iJxisting"Zoning: ,_ ~ ~ ~- ~ ~~ 'Size of parcel(s): Acres: ~ ~~~~~ ~, Existing Land Use: r ~E';Zi.; L.c:jt" ~ivt3 f e.~~ ,~.~~ ;;,'1 (~ REZONI,?VG AND :SPECIAL USE PEPMIT APPLICANTS (R'Sl Proposed Zoning: ~~*~-~'~+e - ,~~~~ ~?.z ~ea::~5 _. " ~. ~ :, ~ _. Proposed Land Use: ~Y ~ ,°-~. ~,~ ~ ,a~°`".... Does the p„~rcel meet the minimum lot azea, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? L~ 0 ~ Yes No IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. ,,,,~'" " Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes ~-" No O IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUII2ED FIRST ,~/ " If rezoning request, aze conditions being proffered with this request? Yes ~+ No ~ VARIANCE APPLICANTS .(Y) , ~ Variance of Section(s) /~' ~ ~ of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Ts the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. ~ - Consultation ~""° 8 1/2" x i 1 " concept plan Application fee ~F '. Application Metes and bounds description v°" Proffers, if applicable ~'`` Justification Water and sewer application '`~ Adjoining property owners I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract urchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner. ,,~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~~ , j ~ ~, ~,y ; ~ d ~ 3 (! c.~ +/ '~..~i-i`~-~ ~ ~ ~/Y~ ~' `rte'-.F `~ {? ~j~ ~ L~ ` ~ 7 p~ ~ Owner's Signature ~' r- /rL%tF~t-'y~ G / "' JUST)LFICATION FOR `REZONING~OR SPECIAL LFSE PERNIITREQUEST Applicant _~{~k-~~? c°,y S- ~G'}1-~-'~--'1d_-- ~J~- The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinalnce. ,~ / •~.t ~' '~~ ~1 ~ ~~ ~ ~'!?.,~ z~' j ~~a~ ` ~ i S~. ~'-~~JYt ~ ~ j ~7v I-~ ~"t~~ ~~c:,- ~<f i ~'J ~%G' ~i `~f:~ ~(itS ~~,', ~~~ ~''~. s Iv-L'~T !~ W~.S (('~5`~ /-~f C~l~~'~i"J-~ J1•~; d"t ~ S ~ e':' ~' j' S •-~G? Qf:'~_ fi'~tliC ~/~a"~e L; ~~e a (~,, Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. ~~ ~y ~' . .. .~ ~7~o. ffi ~ ~ o . \ • ,OG'99 _ jt7_~~9 1 rota 'e'a a; oa9 NOINOINO 3N30~3 =, :I •8 V1{1TJ~ a ~~ a?IYl g 1 A 1 ~~_ 6 E -ter - 191 'Jd '1001 'B'0 .g .P NOINOINK 'e vNltlYri ~ 'B 3N30(La _ .q ua3doad _ 1-)-90'99 1 xYl ~ ~; btm~~' ~' W Z O 3 W m Z.~D r WV~1 s p u ~~~<_~ n~4Z6 ~W~u~ a ;, xg~so o 0_ ~'n zz U S • ~s~~~ W •y~~~ 4 U ~ ~ ~8~~ l ,a~ V a w ~ to S c I. `"F z~H ~~ ~`~a~ ~i m "~ ~ ~6 a U •W 1 % ~~° Hvj ~a~m = 3 '~~~' N~ wH ~ C 4 o ~ owHW~u W 6 ~ ~j ~' / w ?' n o a~ ~ 6 g z~ ~ ~~ac~a~ ~ ~R 118 X ~,' w o~ooxo (j '.,~~ - W m~ as 1a~~ /~ '^ vla N ~gu 'f , o ~ i y, r 1 ba ti, b m w+ w s '.J Yf' ~ ~~ J m nl~q %~ W p ~ 1 v ~ / _ 1, • ~ z ~,/"~ u 1 9 ~< ~ Cff~$ - 1. ~b W Yp r ~ R,W;s<~_ -~'=mm >i° o~c ,~ `I ~ ~c m 1 z/' .a ,.~- _ ~' ~. t ~ ~ 3=GIL 115 4 .- C M.1Z~r.01N Y ~ ~-"""'-.... ~~ < 0 3 J Z U ~ n DC I U ~- ' ~~¢ ^` ao ' .y Ovi n r 00 ~m 1 ~ N ~^In 3 Ig °' ~ n~ ~ 3 4~ ~ ` '~_ S~ ZI 1 'qk~ ~ ~~. I ~ e~ ~8_QQQbae )j G~ ~>SC 1 I 1 = _~ I _-~ t-~, p • N'7e,1~•~uey ~~.,. , "' . ~,- F i F" }~ L991 'Od )Iil '9'0 g ni: ~ F 21315YONVl . ¢ > ~ 'S 3/.YO R 'M tiflFll(lY a CS-Z-OZ'9L / %Yl c ~m 7s ROANOKE COUNTY Applicant's Name: Jeffrey S. Maronic, Inc. DEPARTMENT OF Zoning: Variance-Amend Proffers COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tax Map No. 76.20-9- > to 11 7' S CONCEPT I'LAN=CHECKLIST' A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County permitting regulations. The,concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request. The County Planning Division staff may exempt some of the items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the following are considered minimum: ALL APPLICANTS _ a. Applicant name and name of development b. Date, scale and north arrow c. Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions _ d. Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties e. Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. f. The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties _ g, All property lines and easements h. AlI buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights i. Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development j. Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces Additional information required for REZONING AND SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANTS _ k. Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site 1. Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers _ m. Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals _ n. Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections o. Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants p. Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed _ q. if project is to be phased, please show phase schedule I certify that all items required in the checklist above are complete. _~~ ~~; ~ Signature of applicant '~ Date ~~E~~~; €: ;< ~~.i~~~ s~i6 v~i0~ rah r~c~ moo o~~ ~~ ~-+ ~F F~+ r-+ N f~~8 ~~;~i o ~~~; ~ L F` ~' •~_ €R ~ sad s ~ °~ ct~ ;~ '~ . at ~~ , ~ ^,.. ~,_. >_ ;~ ,~ „r tt ..~.. / j®,," ' •~ ~_ _ ~ r ~I ,~ _ _ ~ ~~ ...,_.. z ~ ~~ K ~ ; ".~. ~" '. i I ~ / ~[..~ _m ~ 1'~~ Jp a . 1- _ r~ a i ..., .. 2 - -3' ~ r, m 6 r r ~ ~ r , !j ~_ --R' - --- 1r ~ r I N ~ _ ~' r • I i~N_ _ - ~ ~ 3 :~ ~' i L= ~~ ~ ~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ o ~, . ~\, <o ~ ~ ~ ~~~ tie .~ _ _'- a6 ~ 6 \ -~~ \~o e~ £ ~ ~____~__ ~,~ ,'~' ~ / ae 4 ``3nn$$I ~il F ~i ~ ~ 't fl~ ~~ N ` ~ }--- ~ , r ' L ~ R Z ~ ,' k _,!,t ~1 ~ ~ r ' C7 '~,` , ~ ' ~3 y ~ ~ ` ~ ~ _. ~ x'; _ !g 4' q3q3 E ~ r 1 LLL=o ~i=96~• 5~~~ ~ 5 c$ ~~ ~ ~` ~ a ~ ,, 1 ~ , ~~~ ~~ ,' ' ~ ~E ~ q ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ a II ~ I ~=sly ~~~~~~~ ~ - "~ ~ ^ ~~Cjg E4~ 8 ~ ~~~ ~ ~ '.J ~$$ i E:a g~g 9 [ ' ~~ g6 ~G gC~B i~E ~Y L• F~C 6 ~~ _ ~4~ ~~ p g g qy a ~~ ~iHiR~~e~4g8i ~ _ - ~. L~ N ^~ ~~ ~ b ~ T $ ~~ ~~~ ~~ x~;. s x DEVELOPMENT PLAN !lAHONIC SITSDIVISION ~- \~ \~ .\ ~'~ (~'. .i~ M - ;, I' , `: ~_ \\\. .tl bo ._\. ~~~ ~~~ ~ _`.~ (I ~ 4 !I ,1, F ~,~. ~I ~ ~ r _ ' R ~ s ` ' r-'I ~ ' ' 1 + ~~ I i~ E ;C~ ~, ~, . ~ r ~ ,.,~ ~, i ----~- ~ I .,,r ~r, ,,~ ,~¢~,~'~ ,~,~;'`" ._~ ~~ ,, x~~~ ~~~}; ~~~ ~ Y € ~ F~~~ 1 ~g€ °~~ € .~c~y ~ ~ ~ ~ i~3i~5 ~~~ F~`; tt~~'" '•I ~~ +e•_;f ~3:~~i ~ ~~~~ ~R ~ '~~~ . ~~~'~ ~) ~ ~ ~_ ;~I r ~~ '~°~-: ~~ ,~, ~\ ~ti \ ~' -1`\ .~ \ ~ o` ,r' `\ f ( tr r ,r ~~2 t Q ` ~Ix P , .~• Q ~~ r ~c r ~a i • , € ~ ~ L ~~ ~ r a ~ ~' r o ~ +°' h~ ~i~; /. \'. ~ '-' ~~ ,~ g 4 n ~ T D ~i r ~~ ~ . - ~~ ~~ ~ .~ Y _ :,. ~~ ..+" ,~ . , 1 ~.~ Y~%~ x'C F q;i ~ tig 1 ii' ~ t1 9 - In'~y ITS ~ f }il+ \~~'i >~ r ~ f/~: J *~ n !1444^C 4~ F~~ 'o k~_ ~~ ,I~ ` ,, ~~ . u -- S. ,.> = `~ ~- -- >" ~ _ __ ~ __ - , __ ._- ~ S~ r ... ~ kN ~ 6.a~ t ° a ~~ ~ IG =r i B t ~ ~ ','~ i~ ~ ~~ s ~~ { ,7= ~ ~ `fit \ ._ i ~ \ . 3N - - I ~ ~ ~ i R ~ -. Ii -. ~ .. .v. ~1 .# '`~. ~ \,/ IBC i , _ ~ -~ ~ ` ~.- ~, _ -~. I ~ _ '~ ~ ~ f l~ i i ~ £ ~II H AYR' I ' ~ y rr n I ~ ~ v ~f ~rr2 3 s ~ r ~ik1 e, I P 1 tiF ~4r LJ f e ~. I -,~ ~ I ~ E 91 ~'.~M L ~~_- F _Z. ~~. ~~`~ / I~ P., ~ ,ROSS. PI s~ "~~~ •(-~-~/ III I N'} ~ K III , ~ _ ,~/`~.~``t~. '~ }.`, ~ .. I `` \ ~ u .~ I: R ~~ i i I ;L~ ~~ p ..~~~ as~~~ ? ~§~~~~ I _"~ ~~ Sri ~„-~` 1 7~ ` ~ ?~ ¢ I ~ r ~4 i I ,_ f 7'a gR 3^~ {I a a~ 3~~o~a.s ase~~ 3 av ~ ~ ~ R E 5 __ ~ ~ ~~~ i'st ~ .. p :try;a a~ ~~.. a. ~.°--- --- ~~~ ~.+. ..i r -`~ ra ~ k ~ ne1~LOF~+FR dEE,t+ ~' € ~ r~q. t a~~~ a~ ~ ~: ~ N' ~ - e ~ ~~~ 1 "' ~mr,tR+7,{~t ~UantttStotrs ~;`_ ` c ~~i 4' ~~`. ~~~ ~t': S, # ~ ~ ;,., a.x•. EKE cx„!irvvlcwlryia ' { x 9 ~_ ~' ~ k~,; t /1I 1 ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, MARCH 27, 2001 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 4.068-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF CAVE SPRING LAND AND OLD CAVE SPRING ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 76.20-9-1 TO 11) IN THE WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-3, WITH CONDITIONS, TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R- 3, WITH AMENDED CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF JEFFREY S. MARONIC WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 27, 2001, and the second reading and public hearing were held March 27, 2001; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on March 6, 2001; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Ordinance 102296-10 changed the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 4.068 acres, described herein, and located at the intersection of Cave Spring Lane and Old Cave Spring Road (Tax Map Numbers 76.20-9-1 through 12) in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, to the zoning classification of R-3, Medium-Density Multi-Family Residential District, with the following conditions: (1) The subject area will be developed in accordance with the approved plan of Farmington Place Subdivision, bearing revised date of 11/27/95, with the exception that: (a) The access easement across Lots 1 and 9 will be U: \WPDOCS\AGENDA\ZONING\maronic.rzn.frm 1 eliminated, and ~' (b) Lots 9 and 10 will be served by the same private road currently serving Lots 11 and 12, and the storm water detention pond. (2) The Homeowner's Association, which has been established to provide for the maintenance of the private road serving Lots 11 and 12, and the storm water management area, will be responsible for the entire length of said roadway, as it serves Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12. (3) The proposed private road will not be built to state standards. (4) The proposed development will continue to be built to the same standards as the existing homes. They will be similar in quality and size as the existing homes, with a minimum square footage of 1,400 square feet. (5) The proposed road will not be extended, and will serve only Lots 9, 10, 11, 12, as said lots are designated on the Plat of Farmington Place dated September 8, 1995, and approved by Roanoke County on November 3, 1995. (6) The proposed road serving Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 is private and its maintenance, including snow removal, shall not be a public responsibility. It shall not be eligible for acceptance into the State Secondary System for maintenance until such time as it is constructed and otherwise complies with all requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation for the addition of subdivision streets current at the time of such request. Any costs required to cause this street to become eligible for addition to the State system shall be provided with funds other than those administered by the Virginia Department of Transportation. 2. That this action to amend Condition (5) above was taken upon the application of Jeffrey S. Maronic. 3. That the owner of the property voluntarily proffered in writing the following amended Condition (5) which is accepted by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia: (5) The private access road as shown on the approved plan for Farmington Place Subdivision revised 11/27/95 U: \WPDOCS\AGENDA\ZONING\maronic.rzn.frm 2 i shall only serve Roanoke County Tax Parcels 76.20-9-8 75 through 11 and 76.20-3-6 and shall not be extended. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the westerly side of Old Cave Spring Road (Route 1663) and the southerly side of Cave Spring Lane (Route 1652) as it intersects; thence with the westerly line of Old Cave Spring Road and with a curve to the left with a chord bearing and distance of S. 10 deg. 12' 00" W. 246.29 feet and an arc distance of 246.59 feet to a point; thence S. 05 deg. 21' 11" W. 111.38 feet to a point on the northerly line of property now or formerly of William Hancock (Tax No. 76.20-3-6); thence leaving Old Cave Spring Road and with Hancock line S. 80 deg. 15' 00" W. 359.02 feet to a post; thence S. 10 deg. 41' 21" E. 96.78 feet to a point; thence S. 72 deg. 04' 31" W. 50.39 feet to a point on the easterly line of property now or formerly of R. J. Birkenmaier (Tax No. 76.20-3-9); thence with the Birkenmaier line N. 32 deg. 00' 00" W. 293.56 feet to a point on the southerly line of property now or formerly of J. S. Maronic (Tax No. 76.20-3-8); thence with the Maronic line N. 78 deg. 20' 00" E. 52.30 feet to a point; thence N. 11 deg. 12' 30" W. 137.87 feet to a point on the southerly side of Cave Spring Lane (Route 1652); thence with Cave Spring Lane N. 79 deg. 47' 08" E. 89.54 feet to a point; thence N. 75 deg. 43' 30" E. 472.02 feet to a point; thence S. 84 deg. 18' 49" E. 23.53 feet to the point and place of beginning, and containing 4.068 acres as shown on a survey for Jeffrey S. Maronic and Laura J. Maronic dated December 27, 1993 and made by Balzer & Associates, Engineers and Surveyors. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\ZONING\maronic.rzn.frm 3 d ~ ~{ ~j. r. ,f fi'C 5 .I r ~ _ I ~' a ~~ ~ r .. _ _. a r ~.~ + P ok, ~ ~~~^ n~~ ~ 'r. 1~ ~1 1 .ii; ;~ ~a ~_ ~ ti ~~ E.,f ~ i ~.~~ ~~ , _ ~ ;~ ~:r 1 , ti e ; a -Yi ~ ~ ,: ~~ 3 ,.v~,.. ~ ~ v, . ;~;, 'ti ~~ ,,; ii' ' . ~~ ~. }~ ` '~ 1 P ~~C ~~ f s._`, 1 ~a IA~A1 ~I _~ .. '. f f,. , ~ `~ ~" 1~ti ``°J Fil y, i S ., ~ _ ~ s ~,, ,,._ ; fi V ; Y ;r ~ i ' if _ t ...,'~ ~~1.~ -,.~ - . ~\` _ _ ,off .. 'P. „r ~ r f s: ~ -~ ,~ - .; ~ ~. ,~ -_ . ~ `~ ,.;, ~. ~` . '~ r ;,~ } I _ b ( :° - ,~ _ - -- ~ - A: 61 ~ ~ -~ „ ~ _~ ~, ' ~ ~ '~ - -- ° xn ~ eI 1, ^< ~ i n ~ ~ ,~ k -, ~ Y. 1. ~ ~ (f , s i i ~, 1 ~ ~ ~~ _ . _ I ~. i ~-ii > i ~ >. s~ ~ i ~ ~~ ~ ~~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 27, 2001 ORDINANCE 032701-9 ACCEPTING AN OFFER FOR AND AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF 37.86 ACRES OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED IN THE CITY OF SALEM (THE LLOYD PROPERTY -TAX MAP NO. 194-1-1) BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property has been declared to be surplus, and has been made available for sale; and 2. That the public notice regarding the public hearing for the sale of this surplus property was advertised in the Roanoke Times & World News on January 30, 2001 and February 6, 2001; and 3. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading of this ordinance was held on January 23, 2001; and the second reading and public hearing on this ordinance was held on February 13, 2001, continued to February 27, 2001, continued to March 13, 2001, and continued to March 27, 2001, concerning the sale and disposition of 37.86 acres of real estate located in the City of Salem, and known as the Lloyd Property; and 4. That an offer has been received from Christian Life Fellowship Church to purchase 37.86 acres of real estate for the sum of 984 000 and this offer is hereby accepted; and 5. That the proceeds from the sale of this real estate are to be allocated to the capital reserves of the County to be expended solely for the purposes of acquisition, -. construction, maintenance, or replace of other capital facilities; and 6. That the County Administrator, or any Assistant County Administrator, is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said property, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. On motion of Supervisor Church to adopt the ordinance accepting an offer from Christian Life Fellowship Church for $984,000, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: .-~ • ~.C..-ll.~-ti- Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Diane D. Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer Danial Morris, Director, Finance William E. Driver, Director, Real Estate Valuation Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 2 Action No. Item No.~-.~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 27, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE ACCEPTING AN OFFER FOR AND AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF 37.86 ACRES OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED IN THE CITY OF SALEM (THE LLOYD PROPERTY -TAX MAP NO. 194-1-1) COUNTY ADMINIST/R~AT//O'R'S COMMENTS: ~~,, ~ Q.~~~ ~W Q~'r~t~tfi~Y.L -~~ ~"" gra.GS~" ~a~c~Yl~e~r U EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This is the continuation of the second reading of a proposed ordinance to authorize the conveyance of a 37.86-acre parcel of real estate located in the City of Salem (Tax Map No. 194-1-1). BACKGROUND: The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County has previously declared this property to be surplus property and available for sale to the public. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Roanoke County has received an offer to purchase a 37.86-acre parcel of real estate located in the City of Salem and known as the Lloyd Property. A public notice regarding the public hearing for the sale of this surplus property was published in the Roanoke Times on January 30, 2001 and February 6, 2001, March 13, 2001, and March 27, 2001. FISCAL IMPACT: The proceeds from the sale of this property will be allocated to the Capital Projects Fund. U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\REALEST\LLOYD.RPT ~` RECOMMENDATIONS: Staffrecommends that the Board approve the second reading of this ordinance and authorize the County Administrator or any Assistant County Administrator to execute the necessary documents to consummate this transaction. Respectfully submitted, i 1 , \ Paul M. Mahoney Roanoke County Attorney Action Vote No Yes Abs Approved () Motion by Church Denied () Johnson Received () McNamara Referred () Minnix to Nickens U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\REALEST\LLOYD.RPT 2 x P l./ti ... AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 27, 2001 ORDINANCE ACCEPTING AN OFFER FOR AND AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF 37.86 ACRES OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED IN THE CITY OF SALEM (THE LLOYD PROPERTY -TAX MAP NO. 194-1-1) BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property has been declared to be surplus, and has been made available for sale; and 2. That the public notice regarding the public hearing for the sale of this surplus property was advertised in the Roanoke Times & World News on January 30, 2001 and February 6, 2001; and 3. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading of this ordinance was held on January 23, 2001; and the second reading and public hearing on this ordinance was held on February 13, 2001, continued to February 27, 2001, continued to March 13, 2001, and continued to March 27, 2001, concerning the sale and disposition of 37.86 acres of real estate located in the City of Salem, and known as the Lloyd Property; and 4. That an offer has been received from to purchase 37.86 acres and this offer is hereby accepted; and of real estate for the sum of 5. That the proceeds from the sale of this real estate are to be allocated to the capital reserves of the County to be expended solely for the purposes of acquisition, construction, maintenance, or replace of other capital facilities; and 6. That the County Administrator, or any Assistant County Administrator, is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said property, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. 1 U: \ W PDOCS\AGENDA\REALEST111oyd.clf.wpd f ~ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~M APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE ~'` CITIZEN COMMENTS 1 SUBJECT: ('1- try'' ~ ~~ ,~; C2.~:`~ { _< I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize~me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~~~ --,-~n_ ~ ADDRESS: ~:,~, ~ ,,~ ~~ /" ~ ~~--;~ `~-~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ `~ j :7 ~ f PHONE: ~ ~`~ ~~ - , ~ . AGENDA ITEM NO. ~- ~ APPEARANCE REQUEST -PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE ~C CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: /L/ice ~ LCeJcrJ'~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~C ~ Cs Ie i nom' ADDRESS: ~~ ~~S I~o-~'}~,,,- ~'~.~.~. PHONE: q 24 -~f ~S~ AGENDA ITEM NO. APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEART G OR INA CE _,~CITIZEN COMMENTS ~~;~~ SUBJECT: ~ ~~~ ~~ , ~~~ ~~'~ -~C~ ~ ~ ~ ~~I1E~ ~l~J~!~ ;, I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE G[//DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ ^ ^ ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~~ f~~~~ M~ ~1 ,/ I PHONE: "I'J w ADDRESS: _~~ ~~ ~ C~~tf USU~ ~V +I~ AGENDA ITEM NO. APPEARANCE REQUEST -PUBLIC HEARING -ORDINANCE ~ITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: `~c~c<,r~ 5 ~c~c~ `~r'on -~ ~rt- ~ ~~ ~~5' ~~~~ >~ ~~ ~ ~~. I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW; ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~~ ~~, ~ C~ v~; 5 ADDRESS: `310= PHONE: _ _ ~ ~ ~ - ~~~ ., 0~ POANp,~~ • ~ p Z G7 a Cn~~~~ ~a~ ~a~xx~~.~.~e 1838 Board of Supervisors P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix, Chairman Bob L. Johnson Cave Spring Magisterial District Hollins Magisterial District Joseph B. "Butch" Church, Vice-Chairman Joseph McNamara Catawba Magisterial District Windsor Hills Magisterial District Harry C. Nickens Vinton Magisterial District March 28, 2001 Rev. Keith Beasley Good Shepherd Lutheran Church 1887 Electric Road, SW Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Reverend Beasley: On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, I would like to thank you for offering the invocation at our meeting on Tuesday, March 27, 2001. We believe it is most important to ask for divine guidance at these meetings and the Board is very grateful for your contribution. Thank you again for sharing your time and your words with us. It was good to have you with us. With kindest regards, H. Odell "Fuzzy "Minnix, Chairman Roanoke County Board of Supervisors OFFICE: FAX: VOICE MAIL: (540) 772-2005 (540) 772-2193 (540) 772-2170 E-Mail bos C~co.roanoke.va.us o~ ~oaNO,~~ , , ~~ , A ~ ' ~ ~ a C~~a~~~ aa~ ~a~xxY~a.~..~ 1838 Board of Supervisors P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix, Chairman Bob L. Johnson Cave Spring Magisterial District Hollins Magisterial District Joseph B. "Butch" Church, Vice-Chairman Joseph McNamara Catawba Magisterial District Windsor Hills Magisterial District Harry C. Nickens Vinton Magisterial District March 29, 2001 Mr. David Rundgren New Valley Planning District Commission P. O. Box 3726 Radford, VA 24143 Dear Mr. Rundgren: Attached is a copy of Action A-032701-5 approving the acquisition of additional shares of ownership in the New River Valley Commerce Park by Roanoke County. This action was taken by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, March 27, 2001, by a unanimous vote. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ~• Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bj h Enclosure cc: Jill B Barr, Assistant Director, Economic Development OFFICE: FAX: VOICE MAIL: (540) 772-2005 (540) 772-2193 (540) 772-2170 E-Mail bos ~co.roanoke.va.us L- Mary Allen -Legal Notices -Reply Page 1 From: Legals Staff <legals@roanoke.com> To: <MALLEN@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: 3/12/01 11:14AM Subject: Legal Notices -Reply Runs March 13 & 20 -cost $115.42.... LEGAL NOTICE ~ROANOKE COUNTY ABOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board Of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, March 27, 2001, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Larry E. Huffman to obtain a Special Use Permit for 13.4 acres for a private stable located at Carlos Drive (Rt. 616), Hollins Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Community Development, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: March 9, 2001 Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board (1628449) Mary Allen -Legal Notices -Reply Page 1 From: Legals Staff <legals@roanoke.com> To: <MALLEN@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: 3/12/01 11:08AM Subject: Legal Notices -Reply Ad will run March 13 & 20 -cost $119.40... LEGAL NOTICE ~ROANOKE COUNTY ABOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board Of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, March 27, 2001, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Marc I. Wilson to obtain a Special Use Permit to operate an Automobile Dealership, Used on 1.4088 acres located at 3328 Peters Creek Road, Catawba Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Community Development, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: March 9, 2001 Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board (1628436) Mary Allen -Legal Notices -Reply Page 1 From: Legals Staff <legals@roanoke.com> To: <MALLEN@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: 3/12/01 11:02AM Subject: Legal Notices -Reply Ad runs March 13 & 20 -cost $127.36....thanks LEGAL NOTICE ~ROANOKE COUNTY ABOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board Of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, March 27, 2001, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of W. F. Walker to rezone 4.369 acres from AG-1, Agriculture to AR, Agricultural Residential to construct new single family houses located at 1114 Skyview Road (Route 755), Catawba Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Community Development, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: March 9, 2001 Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board (1628429) Mary Allen -March 27 legal notices -Reply Page 1 From: Legals Staff <legals@roanoke.com> To: <MALLEN@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: 3/12/01 10:58AM Subject: March 27 legal notices -Reply Ad runs March 13 & 20 -cost $119.40...thanks (LEGAL NOTICE ~ROANOKE COUNTY ABOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board Of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, March 27, 2001, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Judy Gustafson to rezone 200 acres from R-1 Residential District to AG-3 Agriculture for a commercial stable located on 5350 Poor Mountain Road, Salem, VA 24153, Catawba Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Community Development, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: March 9, 2001 Mary H. Allen, Clerk (1628405) Mary Allen -Public Hearing -Reply Page 1 From: Legals Staff <legals@roanoke.com> To: <MALLEN@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: 3/12/01 10:10AM Subject: Public Hearing -Reply thanks - ad will run March 13 & 20 -cost $167.16 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING SON PROPOSED SCHOOL BOND FINANCING ~BY COUNTY OFD ~ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Notice is hereby given that the Board of Supervisors (`Board of Supervisors*) of the County of Roanoke, Virginia (*County*) will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 15.2-2606 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, on the issuance of general obligation school bonds (*Bonds*) of the County in the estimated maximum amount of *16,500,000 to finance certain capital projects for school purposes. A resolution authorizing the issuance of the Bonds will be considered by the Board of Supervisors at its meeting on March 27, 2001. The public hearing, which may be continued or adjourned, will be held at 7:00 o'clock p.m. on March 27, 2001, before the Board of Supervisors in the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, Virginia. Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors (1628272) Mary Allen - Re: Legal Notices -Reply Page 1 From: Mary Allen To: Legals Staff Subject: Re: Legal Notices -Reply Got them all -thanks. »> Legals Staff <legals@roanoke.com> 03/12/01 11:24AM »> RUNS MARCH 13 & 20 -COST $135.32. THANKS---HAVE A GOOD DAY! Martha LEGAL NOTICE ~ROANOKE COUNTY ABOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board Of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, March 27, 2001, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Jeffrey S. Maronic to rezone 4.068 acres from R-3, Medium Density Residential with conditions to R-3 Medium Density Residential with amended conditions, property located at the intersection of Cave Spring Lane and Old Cave Spring Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Community Development, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: March 9, 2001 Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board (1628460) Mary Allen -Legal Notices -Reply Page 1 From: Legals Staff <legals@roanoke.com> To: <MALLEN@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: 3/12/01 11:22AM Subject: Legal Notices -Reply RUNS MARCH 13 & 20 -COST $135.32. THANKS---HAVE A GOOD DAY! Martha LEGAL NOTICE ~ROANOKE COUNTY ABOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board Of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, March 27, 2001, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Jeffrey S. Maronic to rezone 4.068 acres from R-3, Medium Density Residential with conditions to R-3 Medium Density Residential with amended conditions, property located at the intersection of Cave Spring Lane and Old Cave Spring Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Community Development, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: March 9, 2001 Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board (1628460) LEGAL NOTICE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board Of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, March 27, 2001, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Judy Gustafson to rezone 200 acres from R-1 Residential District to AG-3 Agriculture for a commercial stable located on 5350 Poor Mountain Road, Salem, VA 24153, Catawba Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Community Development, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: March 9, 2001 Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Tuesday, March 13, 2001 Tuesday, March 20, 2001 Direct the bill for publication to: Judy Gustafson 5350 Poor Mountain Road Salem, VA 24153 (540) 380-5128 SEND ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 Times: LEGAL NOTICE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board Of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, March 27, 2001, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Judy Gustafson to obtain a Special Use Permit to rezone 200 acres from R-1 Residential District to AG-3 Agriculture Permit for a commercial stable located on 5350 Poor Mountain Road, Salem, VA 24153, Catawba Magisterial District.. A copy of this application is available for inspection Community Development, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, Dated: March 9, 2001 Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 Tuesday, March 20, 2001 Direct the bill for publication to: Judy Gustafson 5350 Poor Mountain Road Salem, VA 24153 (540) 380-5128 in the Department of VA. SEND ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board Of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, March 27, 2001, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of W. F. Walker to rezone 4.369 acres from AG-1, Agriculture to AR, Agricultural Residential to construct new single family houses located at 1114 Skyview Road (Route 755), Catawba Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Community Development, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: March 9, 2001 Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 Tuesday, March 20, 2001 Direct the bill for publication to: W. F. Walker 191 Twin Oaks Road Wirtz, VA 24184 (540) 721-4201 SEND ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 2 LEGAL NOTICE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board Of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, March 27, 2001, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Marc I. Wilson to obtain a Special Use Permit to operate an Automobile Dealership, Used on 1.4088 acres located at 3328 Peters Creek Road, Catawba Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Community Development, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: March 9, 2001 Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 Tuesday, March 20, 2001 Direct the bill for publication to: Marc I. Wilson 5001 Glenvar Hts. Blvd. Salem, VA 24153 (540) 563-1133 SEND ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 3 LEGAL NOTICE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board Of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, March 27, 2001, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Larry E. Huffman to obtain a Special Use Permit for 13.4 acres for a private stable located at Carlos Drive (Rt. 616), Hollins Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Community Development, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: March 9, 2001 Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 Tuesday, March 20, 2001 Direct the bill for publication to: Larry E. Huffman 8204 Olde Tavern Road Roanoke, VA 24019-6805 (540) 366-3431 SEND ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 4 LEGAL NOTICE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board Of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, March 27, 2001, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Jeffrey S. Maronic to rezone 4.068 acres from R-3, Medium Density Residential with conditions to R-3 Medium Density Residential with amended conditions, property located at the intersection of Cave Spring Lane and Old Cave Spring Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Community Development, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: March 9, 2001 Mary H. Allen, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 Tuesday, March 20, 2001 Direct the bill for publication to: Jeffrey S. Maronic 4932 Cave Spring Lane Roanoke, VA 24018 (540) 772-2727 SEND ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 s Mary Allen -Legal Notices Page 1 From: Mary Allen To: Legals Staff Date: 3/6/01 8:20AM Subject: Legal Notices Attached are 5 legal notices for the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting on March 27, 2001. Please publish on Tuesday, March 13 and Tuesday March 20. E-mail or call me if you have any questions. Mary H. Allen CMC Clerk to the Board County of Roanoke 540-772-2003 CC: Tammi Wood 1 O~ ROANp,Y~ a ~ . A z c~ ~ 2 J a 1838 C~.~~n~~ ~f ~~~r~o~.~ DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET W. BRENT ROBERTSON, CPA DIRECTOR March 7, 2001 Roanoke Times & World News Legal Advertisement Department 201-209 Campbell Avenue, SW Roanoke, VA 24011 To Whom It May Concern: GERALDINE BRICKHOUSE BARBER BUDGET ADMINISTRATOR Please publish the enclosed legal advertisement on March 13, 2001 and March 20, 2001. Bill the cost of the publication to: County of Roanoke ATTN: Mary Allen Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 I would like to review a draft of the advertisement before publication. My fax number is 772-2089. A copy of the ad from 2000 has been included for your information.. I would like the current ad to be of the same approximate size as last year's ad. Sincerely, ~lJ -~ W. Brent Robertson Budget Director c: Elmer Hodge, County Administrator Mary Allen, Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Kathi Scearce, Director, Community Relations P.O. BOX 29800 • ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 • (540) 772-2021 • FAX (540) 772-2089 PUBLIC NOTICE Please be advised that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, at its meeting on the 27th day of March, 2001 at the Roanoke County Administration Center in Roanoke, Virginia, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, will hold a public hearing on the following matter, to-wit: TO SET A REAL ESTATE TAX RATE OF NOT MORE THAN $1.13 PER $100 ASSESSED VALUATION IN ROANOKE COUNTY. TO SET A PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX RATE OF NOT MORE THAN $3.50 PER $100 ASSESSED VALUATION IN ROANOKE COUNTY. TO SET A MACHINERY AND TOOLS TAX RATE OF NOT MORE THAN $3.00 PER $100 ASSESSED VALUATION IN ROANOKE COUNTY. Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Publish on the following dates: March 13, 2001 March 20, 2001 FEB-14-200® 11 50 RL]HNUKt 111"IC5 Hll1J. urCtC. ~nusua No*~cE please be advised that the 19oarri of Supervisors of Roanoke County, at its meeting on the 44th day of Febrtaary, Q000 at the Roanoke County Adrttinistration Center in Roanoke, Virginia, et 7:00 p.m. or as soon thcreatter as the matter may be heard, will hold a public hearing on the fol- lowing matter, to-wit: TO SET A REAL E4TATE TAX RATE OF NO? MIORE THAN #1.13 PER #i08 ASSESSED YA~It- ATION IN ROANOItE COUNTtI. TO SET A PERSONIAL PROPER>y TAx RATE OF NOT MORE THAN #3.50 PER #148 ASSESSED VALUATION IN ROANOKE C0IJNTY. 1'O SEi A MACHINERY AND TCWLS TAX RATE OF NOT MORE THAN #3.80 PER #988 ASSESSEb vALUATION iN RO~-NOKE COUNTY. Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board of Supervisors ~~ 34~~~ Attention 1 JtiL~ 701 JG V~ ' ., H. seN at 3~e Ilne ofi ~ on wIARGM in, .. .. 42f aegeeS 25' 00" NOON,: In hunt of tfie" h,. . W. 110.0 fleet to the place of - begfnning, and,=containing housing the Roenoke_:Clty _, 4 ,pus~l~c ~~~~c~ ~s ,f . o '"`Plea§e be advised'tfiat the Board of Supervisors ` ofRbanoke,County, at its meeting on the 29th ,, ~,_ ' ;day- of February, 4QQD at the `Roanoke County ;; iec, Administration Center in Roanoke, Virginia, et e~ - - 700 p.m. or`as soon thereafter:es the matter may ,~. be'fieard, will holde public hearing on'the fol- wo .towing matter, to-wit: rer W, u ~ , Pr~,F i~:TO SET A; REAL .ESTATE TAX RATE OF NOT'' `':MORE THAN :$1.13'"PER $100 ASSESSED VALU. '•'ATION iIN ROANOKE~:COLINTY. ~''~ ~ • rT0 SEi A PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX RATE OF s; 'NOT MORE THAN $9.50 PER'$1D0 ASSESSED 5 V%4LUATION IN ROANOID: COUNFi~. "TO SET ,A MACHINERY AND TOOLS TAX RATE `"' ' ~;OF NOT .MORE :THAN $9.D0 PER $f00 ~" '" ASSESSED VALUATION IN ROANOKE~ COUNTY. s ~: -Mary H. Allen bk tnE; '_Clerkto4he Board of Supervisors '°: (1349438) ~• ~ GI:. ROANOKE Tl E A PA lE~ Publish Date: Call (540} 981-3141 or Fax {540} 981-3204 for APPROVAL or Revisions by date ~ .dime ~ ~ ~~ DTl # v Proof out: date ~'_~..._. time _.._. N' Proofed by: ~`j TOTAL P. 01 ~ OF µOAN ,Y F ~ . ' . 's~ z c~ °v a 1838 (~n~txr~~ ~~~ ~~~txta~re DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET W. BRENT ROBERTSON, CPA DIRECTOR March 13, 2001 Roanoke Times and World News Retail Advertising Division 201 W. Campbell Avenue Roanoke, VA 24011 To Whom It May Concern, GERALDINE BRICKHOUSE BARBER BUDGET ADMINISTRATOR Enclosed you will find a "Notice of Proposed Tax Increase" advertisement for the County of Roanoke. Please publish this as a block ad on Tuesday, March 20, 2001. Bill the cost of publication to: County of Roanoke ATTN: Mary Allen Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 I would like to review a draft of the advertisement before publication. My fax number is 772-2089. Sincerely, W. Brent Robertson Budget Director C: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Mary Allen, Clerk to the Board Kathi Scearce, Community Relations P.O. BOX 29800 • ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 • (540) 772-2021 • FAX (540) 772-2089 ®Recycled Peper NOTICE OF PROPOSED REAL PROPERTY TAX INCREASE The County of Roanoke proposes to increase property tax levies. Assessment Increase: Total assessed value of real property, excluding additional assessments due to new construction or improvements to property exceeds last year's total assessed value of real property by 3.79 percent. 2. Lowered Rate Necessary to Offset Increased Assessment: The tax rate which would levy the same amount of real estate tax as last year, when multiplied by the new total assessed value of real estate with the exclusions mentioned above, would be $1.09 per $100 of assessed value. This rate will be known as the "lowered tax rate." 3. Effective Rate Increase: The County of Roanoke proposes to adopt a tax rate of $1.13 per $100 of assessed value. The difference between the lowered tax rate and the current rate would be $0.04 per $100, or 3.67 percent. This difference will be known as the "effective tax rate increase." 4. Proposed Total Budget Increase: Based on the proposed real property tax rate and changes in other revenues, the total budget of the County of Roanoke will exceed last year's by 6.2 percent. The County will adopt the FY01-02 budget late spring, 2001. Individual property taxes may, however, increase at a percentage greater than or less than the above percentage. A public hearing on the increase will be held on Tuesday, March 27, 2001, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, Virginia. Special Instructions This notice shall be at least the size ofone-eighth page of a standard size or a tabloid size newspaper, and the headline in the advertisement shall be in a type no smaller than 18-point. The notice shall not be placed in that portion, if any, of the newspaper reserved for legal notices and classified advertisements. This notice must be published on March 20, 2001, and billed to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. ~~Q ROANp,~.~ a ~ ~ ~ _~ ° a 1838 C~~~n~~ u~ ~u~x~uC~e DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET W. BRENT ROBERTSON, CPA DIRECTOR March 12, 2001 Roanoke Times & World News Legal Advertisement Department 201-209 Campbell Avenue, SW Roanoke, VA 24011 To Whom It May Concern: GERALDINE BRICKHOUSE BARBER BUDGET ADMINISTRATOR Please publish the enclosed public notice as a block advertisement on Tuesday, March 20, 2001. Bill the cost of publication to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors at the following address: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors ATTN: Mary Allen P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 A copy of last year's ad is attached. This year's ad should be of the same approximate size. I would like to review the proof when completed. My fax number is 772-2089; phone is 772- 2021. Thank you. Sincerely, W ~~ W. Brent Robertson Budget Director Enclosure c: Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Mary Allen, Clerk to the Board Kathi Scearce, Director, Community Relations Elmer Hodge, County Administrator P.O. BOX 29800 • ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 • (540) 772-2021 • FAX (540) 772-2089 f4a Raevclad Paear .~ COUNTY OF ROANOKE PUBLIC HEARING CITIZEN INPUT FOR THE 2001-2002 BUDGET The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County invites citizens of Roanoke County to offer written or oral comment for items to be included in the budget for the 2001-02 fiscal year. An informational public hearing, to receive citizen comment, will be held on Tuesday, March 27, 2001 at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as may be heard, at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, S.W., Roanoke, Virginia. All interested citizens are invited to attend this meeting. SENIOR AND CHALLENGED CITIZEN'S COMMISSION HOUSING RECOMMENDATIONS It appears that the County needs more rental housing (especially 3 &4 bedroom) and affordable housing for low to moderate income households. (The County also needs more accessible housing units for individuals with disabilities.) This need is in multi-unit, as well as single unit, housing. 2. We therefore request your action to direct the Planning Department together with Blue Ridge Housing and using consultant services to develop an assessment on the need for, the feasibility of, and the desirability of a affordable housing in Roanoke County. This should target low and middle-income citizens who do not qualify for subsidies. Public service announcements could aid in determining this. 3. We urge you to have staff contact agencies to research programs and funding options available to develop affordable housing for County citizens who are elderly/disabled and to present recommendations to the Board. 4. We recommend that action be taken by the County to encourage developers applying for permits to build multiple single family units or multi-family units, of housing to build apre-approved percentage of units to meet federal accessibility standards. 5. We request that the minimum lot size requirements be reviewed and selectively reduced so that the Planning Department can encourage developers to construct smaller houses to increase the stock of affordable housing. 6. Builders of multi-unit housing should be heartily encouraged to utilize the federal tax credit program. 7. Request Blue Ridge Housing Development Authority to become our public sector developer of affordable housing, using such units as are available under Title 202 and those available under the Federal Home Bank Loan. 8. Invite the City Housing Authority into a joint partnership for developing affordable/accessible housing via revenue bonds. 95% of the money can be borrowed, using HUD insurance. 9. Explore a joint venture with private businesses to develop an assisted living center, which would be affordable to citizens unable to pay the rates at existing facilities. Governor Gilmore now has a special unit working on assisted living. 10. Focus on, fund, and "promote the development" of services that promote independent living arrangements for citizens who are elderly or have disabilities. 11. Fund or increase the "funding to the agencies that rp ovide " independent living support services for Roanoke County residents. 12. If a need is determined, we urge Roanoke County to pursue an organized project utilizing Federal and State funding. Consider offering a subsidized rental program for residents utilizing a sliding scale for rents. 13. Encourage Federal and State legislation to allow Roanoke County to qualify for funding (Community Block Funding Grant). NewsLibrary Document Delivery I~QwsL~brarv ~.....« ~:~.~.~_ :~~~~.~. ~ ~ No,p ROANOKE TIMES Sunday, February 18, 2001 Section: SPORTS Edition: METRO Page: C6 GROUP EFFORT LIFTS KNIGHTS' BOYS GROUP AAA SWIMMING CHAMPIONSHIPS FROM STAFF REPORTS After winning the 2000 Group AAA boys' swimming championship as an underdog, Cave Spring High School repeated Saturday as the favorite. The Knights set six school records at George Mason University and scored 179 1/2 points to hold off runner-up Menchville High School of Newport News, which finished with 170. "We didn't have an individual champion," first-year Cave Spring coach Shannon Summerlin said. "I think that shows the kind of team effort it was." The Knights were led by senior Tommy Rappold, who finished second in the 100-yard butterfly and fourth in the 100 backstroke. Junior Andy Bauman was third in the 200 individual medley and fifth in the 100 backstroke. Rappold and Bauman were joined by junior Brett Fonder and freshman Mark Bauman on the 200 medley relay that finished second. The 400 freestyle relay of Rappold, Fonder, Andy Bauman and Kevin Boucher was third. The Patrick Henry boys' team was 42nd, with freshman Peter Volosin scoring in two events. Langley High School won the Group AAA girls' meet for the fourth year in a row. Patrick Henry was 13th and Cave Spring was 27th, with senior Sarah Jane Bova the Knights' lone scorer. Patrick Henry junior Lindsay Hock had the best finish by a Roanoke Valley District girl, fourth in the 500 freestyle, and was and ninth in the 200 IM. Teammate Bernetta McGuire was ninth in the 50 freestyle and 10th in the 100 butterfly, earning All-America consideration in the former. The PH 200 medley relay team of Emily Althouse, Hock, McGuire and Christine Hitchins placed ninth. Among boys, Rappold and Andy Bauman earned All-America consideration. "I thought our boys would win because they had won last year and hadn't lost too many swimmers," Summerlin said. "It turned out closer than I would have liked. I thought it was going to come down to the last relay and really it didn't, but we finished up strong anyway." Page 1 of 2 http://www.newslibrary.com/deliverppdoc.asp?SMH=44541 l 03/19/2001 ent By: Woods: Rogers &Hazlegrove, PLC; 540 983 7558; Feb-27-01 10:01 AM; Page 1 Woods, Rogers &Hazlegrove, P.L.C. First Union Tower, Suite 1400 i (l Soudl Jefferson Street P. O. Box 14125 Roanoke, Virginia 24038-4125 Facsimile 540.983.7558 Telephone 540.983.7600 FROM: rntnerlin .DATE: Februar~27, 2001 DIRECT DIAT. Nn.:_ 540.983.754b CLIENT-MATTER NO.: Firm PAGE 1 OF TQ: Ms Mary Alden Firm Name: Roanoke county Fax No.: 772-2193 COMMENTS Please notify us immediately at 540.9$3.7.578 if this facsimile is not received properly. Contact: Uiaime Hamilton The information cont.ainCd in this facsimile messa~*e is attorney rrivilcged and coni:fdcntial inft~rmntinn intended only for the use of the addressee. If the reader of this r~aessage is n.ot the intended recipient, yc)u arc hcrcby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this communication is strictly protubit.ed. If you have received ilus communication in error, please immediately notify us by t~elerhone and return the original message to us al the above address via the U.S. Postal Service. Thank you. RKEN63'I %13't.WPD crnn: eaaoao•ooess-ot ent By: Woods, Rogers 8~ Hazlegrove, PLC; 540 983 7558;. Feb-27-01 10:O1AM; Page 213 ~~$~~s a~ r~~ zooo zoar ~~v~ s~~er~'~ $o~s s-wr~ rc:t RYAN A17AMS SCO'i`r ADAMS CIIRIS ADKINS ANDY BADMAN MARK BAiJM,AN RYAN i3LACKW'1:;LL K.EV1N BOUCHER PIERRE BOUC~HF,R JAKE B(JVA DAN1F...I. RGGLESTQN BRETT FONDER COURT FREEDMAN .1OSH HATI,LY DAVID HARBOURT' aCOTT JOHNSON JASON NANZ TUMMY RAPI'OI.~D LEO S'I'RAiJB JOSH SHEPI~xD "GREY WATKINS cOAC~i: SHANNON SLrMM)~;RLIN ~r~CNr~s~~~~~~aM~~rs~~NrS: 7 ,R~~vRDS: 200 MEDLEY RELAY: ANDY BADMAN, MARK BADMAN, TOMMY RAPPULD, BR.~'1"1' FONDER. 1:38.96 zoo 1NDIV~DUAL MEDI.F.Y; ANDY BADMAN. ~ :57.U9 1 UO BUTTERFLY: TOMMY RAPPOLD. 5'I ,O1 500 FREESTYLE: CQLJIZ.T F1~L:.DMAN. 4:51.02 100 I~ACKSTR(}KF.: TQMIviY RAPPOLD. 53.20 4UU FREESTYLE., RELAY: ANDY BAiTMAN, KEVTN BOUCHER, BRE'I'T FONDER, TUMMY RAPPOI...D. 3:15.76 ~4A~N'K.E V.4lL~~ ~X~TjCr~,T~GORj~S: 100 BI.JTTEKFYL: TOMMY RAPPOLU l0U BACKSTR(~Kfi; TUMMY R,APPOLD 200 Ml'/DLEY KI;LAY: ANiaY BAIJMAN, MARK TiAUMAN, TOMMY RAP~'OLD, BR~'1"1' FONDER No~eT~'~'~'ZST1~EC~ro7Y~L 1~~~o1~~S: t00 T3UTTERF'I,Y: TUMMY R~PPOLD ent By: Woods, Rogers 8~ H2zlegrove, PLC; 540 983 7558; Feb-27-01 10:02AM; P2ge 3/3 ~~.c-~erc~- cvNSrD~1eA~rro~ ~u~-~~rNg sr~D~-~Ds 200 MEDI,.LY RELAY: ANDY E3AUMAN, MARK BADMAN, TOMMY RAPP(~T.T), BRETT FONDER 400 FREESTYLE FLAY: ,ANDY BADMAN, KEVIN BOUCI-~R, k3KETT FONDER, TOMMY RAPPOLD 100 BACKSTROK!/~ TAMMY RAPPULD 100 AACKSTRUKE: ANDY BADMAN 100 ~3UTTEIZF'LY: TOMMY R.APPULU Note to: Fuzzy Minnix From: Mary Allen Subj: Cave Spring Swim Team Date: 2/26/01 I called Martha Cobble at Cave Spring to ask about recognizing the CS Swim Team. She gave me the phone number of the Coach, Shannon Summerlin (344-4052). I called Shannon and we have tentatively scheduled the recognition for March 27 at 7:00 gym. She will fax us the names, etc. of the team members and coaches for the resolution and certificate. I also invited Ms. Cobble to attend the meeting. Mary Allen - Re: telephone call from Fuzzy Page 1 ti ~ .. From: Mary Allen To: Brenda Holton Subject: Re: telephone call from Fuzzy O.K. I'll do. Would you check the Roanoke Times web site for the article that was in the paper last week. I also saw that Roanoke Catholic won the Catholic State Championship and is about to play in the Independent High School State Conference. If they win that, I think we should recognize them. Even though the school is in Roanoke City, probably the majority of the students live in Roanoke County. I may mention this to Joe McNamara. Mary »> Brenda Holton 02/26/01 12:29PM »> Fuzzy called on your line and asked that you call Martha Cobble at Cave Spring High School when you return from lunch. Her number is 772-7589. You should get information from her to recognize the CS swim team which won the state title. (Told him we knew they won and we recognized them for winning last year.) ~ ,~~~ ~~~ 3~~- yos~ Mary Allen - VPSA Public Hearing.DOC Page 1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED SCHOOL BOND FINANCING BY THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Notice is hereby given that the Board of Supervisors ("Board of Supervisors") of the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County") will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 15.2-2606 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, on the issuance of general obligation school bonds ("Bonds") of the County in the estimated maximum amount of $16,500,000 to finance certain capital projects for school purposes. A resolution authorizing the issuance of the Bonds will be considered by the Board of Supervisors at its meeting on March 27, 2001. The public hearing, which may be continued or adjourned, will be held at 7:OOo'clock p.m. on March 27, 2001, before the Board of Supervisors in the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, Virginia. \\FI N\41226. I ~_Mary Allen_Public Hearing Page 1 From: Mary Allen To: Legals Staff Date: 3/1 /01 8:35AM Subject: Public Hearing Attached is a public hearing notice. Please publish on Tuesday, March 13, 2001 Tuesday, March 20, 2001 If you have questions, please call me at 772-2003 or by return a-mail. Mary H. Allen CMC Clerk to the Board County of Roanoke 540-772-2003 CC: Diane Hyatt; Sue Patterson-Bane NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED SCHOOL BOND FINANCING BY THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Notice is hereby given that the Board of Supervisors ("Board of Supervisors") of the County of Roanoke, Virginia ("County") will hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 15.2-2606 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, on the issuance of general obligation school bonds ("Bonds") of the County in the estimated maximum amount of $16,500,000 to finance certain capital projects for school purposes. A resolution authorizing the issuance of the Bonds will be considered by the Board of Supervisors at its meeting on March 27, 2001. The public hearing, which may be continued or adjourned, will be held at 7:00 o'clock p.m. on March 27, 2001, before the Board of Supervisors in the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, Virginia. Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors PLEASE PUBLISH ON THE FOLLOWING DATES Tuesday, March 13, 2001 Tuesday, March 20, 2001 Direct the bill for publication and mail affidavit to: Mary H. Allen, Clerk to the Board County of Roanoke P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 Jan-17-Q1 12,:Z7A NORTHSIDE HIGH SCHOOL 540 561 8160 _ P.Ol Narthsid~ M i h School Home of the Vikings 6758 No~thsida High School Rd Roanoke, YA 24018 Phone: (540) 561 ~81 S5 FAX. (540) 561-8160 To: FAX From: (~ ~ r_ ~, sU i :., y auc. .~? P9s: (lndudes opversheet} Dates Rte; CC: v Urg~e:t o For Rovisw a Ploase Comre:o~t ^ Pieaso Rsply v • Commrnts: Jan-17-O1 11:27A NORTHSIDE HIGH SCHOOL 540 561 8160 P.02 ,I ___ :. /Vc2~~}-h~1de_~r~~Gl,2orz~-._._.Vi ia/G -.~oo~~F// _ ._ S~cxsoN._ _~1~C~o .c~ /D ~ - ,~Iu~1:..~/~~_. c¢~!Z~ ., ,. ,~1 .: __ ~~ ~ ~ ____ ~____ 80 _ miS _7ryr~ /x/02 ~y ___. __ _ ~ a.; C~ ~~ - -~ _ __ __ --r7 -- _. --- :_ _ __. J - -- - -._ .._.__ _.J_ ~F T cam -~ l1. luc-1~t c~is~,~«~ - .! Q~~t!s; ~ -c..._ 4, N C ,C~e e Alss ~ ~ t rn aeJ o~ •f /~e ~~~ as . _.. _-- - ..~ 7.~ - /~// e off- --- ___ --~-~1 Zr.~ - Y ~I,S, d~ - ill s T~1 T~ _ - -. ,Brenda Holton -Northside recognition Page 1 From: Brenda Holton To: Joseph Butch Church Date: 1/17/01 11:58AM Subject: Northside recognition Coach Hickam from Northside called me this morning and said that Tommy Morgan and Kevin Capelety said that they could make the 1/23 Board meeting at 7 p.m. for recognition. He gave me home phone number for Tommy 563-1205, and Kevin 563-8954. He is going to fax me the additional information about their records, awards, and stuff. Neither of them have made a decision on college yet -they are still making visits. When I hear from Glenvar about Dereck Williams, I will let you know. Brenda CC: Mary Allen ~ ~ ", ~~ .,_ _ ~~sG~~u~s' A ~" A Or.~fh2 ~j'1Q.2~~- /VE'l2j~SG~ ~~i'j~l~~ ~f4'y"U1 /,~,rc dal / J ~ ~w+7ioi•~ / ~~~1C Z` ®~ /~~n C ~~2~.~e-7~y - /1~.~r~~S>o~ - .C~'sur~-,d - •~;~sr-~ ~.~~iv~.,F' ~ (~.. !~ r s ~~ ~r s ~$) !r, '<~~ ~ .(~ X34 3~ ,~~- ~_ r~~~~ , '~ ~ ~~ ~- ~ ~..~~' /b ~~ Roanoke Times Online Archives 1'O~lil( kE'. ~TII~ l~i~)~~~I1TOI~ TI~'iIJ This article is ©2001 the Times-World Corp. ~ t il: l~, u~ „' !u ~ ~~11i~U~l all ~,,. ~. .. ... JONES REWARDED FOR CHARGERS' RESURGENCE AP ALL-GROUP A FOOTBALL TEAMS Date: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 Section: SPORTS Page: B9 By MARK BERMAN THE ROANOKE TIMES There was no argument who the best football coach in Group A was this year. Bath County's Chris Jones, who took over a team that went 1-9 in 1999 and guided it to the Group A Division 1 title game, was named the Group A Coach of the Year by The Associated Press. He was the unanimous pick of a panel of state sports writers. Jones, 30, guided the 11-2 Chargers to their second appearance in the state final. "I felt we could have the potential to have a winning season, but I didn't foresee us playing for the state championship," Jones said Tuesday. Honaker quarterback Heath Miller, a Virginia recruit who led his team to the Group A Division 2 final, won a tight vote for player of the year. Eight Timesland players made the All-Group A first team. Three were from Giles (10-3), which lost to Honaker in the Group A Division 2 semifinals: junior Carson Ward, one of three running backs on the first team; senior linebacker Justin Williams; and senior defensive back Cooney Ratcliffe. Ward made the second team last year. The other first-team picks from the area were Glenvar senior Page 1 of 3 http://www.newslibrary.com/deliverppdoc.asp?SMH=124509 01/16/2001 • Roanoke Times Online Archives receiver Dereck Williams; Patrick Henry-Glade Spring senior offensive guard Brian Hutton, Bath County senior center Justin Doyle; George Wythe senior defensive lineman Jeremy Hagee; and Fort Chiswell senior punter Michael Paul Alley. Dereck Williams wasn't the only Glenvar player honored. The Spartans, who were left out of the playoffs despite a 7-3 record, had three second-team picks: senior quarterback Brandon Carroll, senior receiver Anthony Hackett and senior linebacker Ryan Still. Three other Timesland players made the second team: Chilhowie senior defensive lineman Tommy Bishop; George Wythe sophomore linebacker Tyrus Gardner; and Radford senior defensive back Chris Alderman. Jones was the defensive coordinator at Sussex Central last year. He dumped the single-wing offense Bath County had run for 15 years and replaced it with asplit-back veer scheme. The Chargers had only two senior starters and played a freshman, Jacob Phillips, at quarterback. They earned their first win at Buffalo Gap since 1977, went unbeaten in Pioneer District play and beat Rural Retreat 53-28 in the Region C Division I final. "Our kids really bought in to what the coaches were teaching," Jones said. "That really didn't take a long time, for them to believe in the schemes we were using and what we were trying to do. And no one really factored in that we would have a freshman quarterback step in and have the season he had. "This offense puts more pressure on your quarterback, but it allows your linemen to get on blocks quicker and the ball hits the line a lot faster." The Chargers' two losses were to unbeaten Riverheads, which downed the Chargers 26-12 in the Group A Division 1 final. Ward rushed for 1,633 yards on 137 carries in the regular season for Giles. He scored 21 touchdowns. Alley averaged 43.2 yards on 20 punts for Fort Chiswell. Dereck Williams caught 51 passes for 731 yards for Glenvar, becoming the third player in Timesland history with at least 50 receptions in a season. He scored 13 touchdowns. Carroll and Hackett also had big years for Glenvar. Carroll completed 61.8 percent of his 228 passes for 2,256 yards and 21 touchdowns. Only Lord Botetourt standout Anthony Ford has Page 2 of 3 http://www.newslibrary.com/deliverppdoc.asp?SMH=124509 01/16/2001 Roanoke Times Online Archives thrown for more yards in a season in Timesland history. Hackett had 37 catches for 700 yards and scored 20 TDs. Miller, a 6-foot-5, 228-pounder, completed almost 100 passes for 1,434 yards and 19 touchdowns for Honaker (13-1). He also ran for 884 yards and nine TDs. For his career, he had 6,239 yards in total offense and 80 TDs. Mark Berman can be reached at 981-3125 or markbe@roanoke.com The Associated Press contributed information to this story. Caption: Photo -FILE THE ROANOKE TIMES Coach Chris Jones guided Bath County to an 11-2 record after the team went 1-9 in 1999. All content herein is ©1997 Times-World Corp. and may not be republished without permission. The Roanoke Times Online is a service of The Roanoke Times. Page 3 of 3 The Roanoke Times archives are stored on a SAVE (tm) newspaper library system from MediaStream, Inc., aKnight- Ridder Inc. company. http://www.newslibrary.com/deliverppdoc.asp?SMH=124509 01/16/2001 ROANOKE TIMES Friday, January 12, 2001 Section: SPORTS Edition: METRO Page: C4 4 AREA PLAYERS EARN AP HONORS ALL-GROUP AAA FOOTBALL FROM STAFF AND WIRE REPORTS Three area football players, including two offensive threats from Pulaski County, were named to the All-Group AAA first team by The Associated Press on Thursday. Senior tight end Jeff Kinq and senior running back Frank Cobbs, who helped Pulaski County reach the Group AAA Division 5 semifinals, were honored by a panel of state sports writers. Cave. Spring junior punter Tom Hagan also made the first team. Cave Spring senior linebacker Chris Gould was asecond-team pick. Michael Robinson of Varina, who made the second team at quarterback and defensive back, was voted player of the year. Mike Skinner, who led Centreville (12-2) to the Group AAA Division 6 title, was named coach of the year. Cobbs rushed for 1,809 yards on 190 carries in the regular season, setting the Pulaski County single-season rushing record. He led Timesland with 27 touchdowns. Kinq, a Virginia Tech recruit, was atwo-way standout for the Cougars (11-2), who made the state semifinals for the first time since 1993. The Cougars lost to eventual champ Heritage in the semifinals. Hagan ranked second in Timesland with an average of 43 yards on 55 punts. The All-Group A punter, Michael Paul Alley of Fort Chiswell, and the All-Group AA punter, Greq Wade of Martinsville. also were from Timesland schools. Gould had 129 tackles, includina 50 solo Robinson, a 6-foot-3, 215-pound senior, has vet to pick a college but is considering Virginia Tech. He rushed for nearly 1,300 yards and 15 touchdowns and passed for 1,056 yards and 12 scores for the state semifinalists. On defense, he had 44 tackles, two interceptions and six pass breakups despite teams throwing away from him when possible. Robinson was beaten out for first-team quarterback honors by Centreville's equally dynamic Nick S_mith~ who passed for 1,000 yards and 12 touchdowns, rushed for 1,382 yards and 13 TDs and led the Wildcats to the Division 6 state championship. Smith was one of six Wildcats to make the first team. All content ©© 2001 ROANOKE TIMES and may not be republished without permission. All archives are stored on a SA VE (tm) newspaper library system from MediaStream Inc., a Knight Ridder, Inc. company. I FROM ROANOKE MOOSE LODGE 284 FAX N0. 1 540 384 7141 Mar. 21 2001 03:34PM P1 Mailing Address P.O. Box 538, Salem, Va. 24153 Phone: 384-7172 March 21, 2001 To: Brenda Holton Roanoke County Deputy Clerk Fax 540 772 2193 From: Roanoke Moose Lodge #284 With reference to our conversations today for the recognition by Roanoke County; following is a list of donations to Roanoke County, in the last annual period: 4 wheel ATV and trailer Arid helmets to Mason Cove Rescue and Fire ($7400.00) ::interfest Event -invited all members and famililes of Mason Cove, Mt. Pleasant and Hollins Fire and Rescue Departments to a night of entertainment including magic, caricature drawing, karaoke, nascar racing track, ball pit slide, and other games along with hamburgers, hot dogs and drinks for everyone $2600.00 in February 2001. Diririer/Open House for Roanoke County Police Dept., Salem Police aT1d Mason Cove Fire and Rescue Dept. Oct 2000 ---Dinner £or 47 pepplE. From 1995-2000 Donations; 2 canines Sokkia SbR33 Total Mapping Station along with lap top computer and software Dare Contribution Critical Incident Team Training for one police office and one psychologist. Goretex Suits for Swat Team Night Vision Equipment Cameras for Domestic Violence Cases Chev. Suburban to Mason Cove 1883 Swift hater Rescue Boat to Mason Cove 19$6 Tr~ere are additional donations on the following page tv Roanoke County along with other donations we have made to our community. ROANOKE LODGE No. 284 LOYAL CARDER OF MOOSE FROM ROANOKE MOOSE LODGE 284 FRX N0. 1 540 384 7141 Mar. 21 2001 03:37PM P1 DONATIONS FOR THE PERIQD ENDIN April 30, 2000 CAMP VA. JAYCEE $1,000.00 6123199 BRUCE HENSLEY VMA HOSPIT. $100.00 7/1199 CATAWBA SCOUT TROOP #1:256 5100.00 7/28/99 CRAIG COUNTY RUI.TAN FQOD BANK $200.00 7/28/99 CRAIG CO. LITTLE LEAGUE $250.00 7/28/99 ROANOKE COUNTY DARE $500,00 7128199 ~ MASSEY CANCER CTN_ $500.00 8118199 VMA FOR MASSEY CANCER $500A0 8127199 VMA LIFE CARE CENTER $500.00 8121/99 VMA SCHOLAR SHIP FUNp $100.00 8/21/99 VA. MEDICAL CENTER $100.00 8119199 JUDY THIERRY BOY SCOUTS $34.49 9114/99 RICHARD WIMMER BOY SCOUTS $43.80 9/14/99 LEATHER CRAFTS BOY SCOUTS $109.86 9!14199 H.COMM. BOY SCOUTS FOOD CAMP. $8,083.25 9/21/99 SOUTH SALEM ELM. SCHOOL $50.00 2N 1/DO.~ ROANOKE CO. DARE $500.00 2120/00 sALEM CITY DARE $soo.oo 2rz0/00~ MASON COVE RESCUE SQUAD $500.00 2120/00 zr- ROANOKE CO. F1RE DEPARTMENT $500.00 2/20/00 VMA SPECIAL pl_YMPIC SOFTBALL $100.00 3/22!00 S.WEST WOODMAN FRAT. pROGRAN $150.00 3/22100 FORESTRY SERVICE DINNER $953.61 4/12l(}p WEST SALEM BOOSTER CLUB $400.00 4112100 RKE_ VALLEY THERAP. FEEDER HOR.' $500.00 3/13/00 CHANCE CRAWFORD BENEFIT $315.00 3/13/00 MASON COVE REC. CLUB LTY. LEAD. $600.00 4/12/00 AM. CANCER SOCIETY ~IOHN WADE $50.00 4/49/00 EASTER SUNRISE BREAKFAST $248.84 4/24J00 MINISTER CHURCH SUNRISE BREAK. $100.00 4/24100 NEW CASTLE HIGH SCHOOL $250.00 4124100 BENEFIT Cf-if1~REN SOFTBALL $150.00 426!00 LIFE CARE CENTER $250.00 4/28100 MASON COVE CHURCH OF BRETH_ $500.00 7/28/99 CAMP JAYCEES 51,000.00 12/29!99 WOTM HALLOWEEN PARTY CHILDRE $300.00 10/7199 HANDY JOHN FOR BOY SCOUTS $28125 10!12199 RK. CITY SCHOOLS ANGEL TREE $1,497.00 11h2199 WOTM XMAS PARTY CHILDREN 5300.00 11129!00 MASSEY CANCER $100.00 1/14100 LIFE CARE CENTER $100.00 1/14100 SPECIAL OLYMPICS $100.00 1114100 ViRG[NIA HOUSE MOOSE 1NT_ $100.00 4/14100 TOTAL $22,417,40 ~, ~~ ~~~ v ~~ RESOLUTION 31092-1 OF APPRECIATION TO THE ~' ROANOKE MOOSE LODGE #284 FOR DONATION OF A VEHICLE TO THE MASON COVE FIRE DEPARTMENT WHEREAS, the Roanoke Moose Lodge #284 has provided a variety of benefits to the people of Roanoke County, and in particular to the residents of the Catawba Valley; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke Moose Lodge #284 recently donated a utility vehicle to the Mason Cove Fire Department; and WHEREAS, the new vehicle will allow the Mason Cove Fire Department personnel to respond more efficiently to fire and disaster scenes, by providing transportation to a number of firefighters along with the necessary gear for emergency situations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, on its own behalf and on behalf of the citizens of Roanoke County, does hereby extend its sincere gratitude and appreciation to the ROANOKE MOOSE LODGE #284 for their generosity and community service to the residents of the Catawba Valley. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None 1.Resolution of Appreciation to Roanoke Moose Lodge No. 284 for Donation of a Rescue Boat to Catawba-Mason Cove Rescue Squad. R-72892-1 Vice Chairman Ed Kohinke presented the resolution to the President of the Roanoke Moose Lodge No. 284. Supervisor Eddy moved to adopt the resolution. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Eddy NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens RESOLUTION 72892-1 OF APPRECIATION TO ROANOKE MOOSE LODGE NO. 284 FOR DONATION OF A RESCUE BOAT TO CATAWBA-MASON COVE RESCUE SQUAD WHEREAS, fire and rescue protection is an important service provided to County residents; and WHEREAS, the volunteer Fire and Rescue Squads of Roanoke County have a long history of outstanding service to the citizens of the County; and WHEREAS, the support of the community is an important component of that service; and WHEREAS, Roanoke Lodge No. 284, Loyal Order of Moose, has donated to the Catawba-Mason Cove Rescue Squad a swift water rescue boat and related equipment, which will be used in the event of flooding, or for rescue in the lakes, rivers and streams of the County; and WHEREAS, through this gift to the Catawba-Mason Cove Rescue Squad, the Roanoke Moose Lodge has demonstrated its generosity and community service orientation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, on its own behalf and on behalf of the citizens of the Mason Cove/Bradshaw area of the County, expresses deepest appreciation and thanks to the ROANOKE MOOSE LODGE NO. 284 and its membership for the support and benevolence which it has shown to Roanoke County. On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Eddy NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens "L ~. / ~ ~ ~~+ _ 1 ..~ /; ~~-~s.~-~~> =-~-mac ..,~.~-~-7'~`t =' ~! --~'.,~ -~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~~ i:rf- /, _. :. -- ; 1 ,~ f ~f'" ." ~ , i~ ~j-cZ'G~' p'1-' / e~'"'~ ~-~~~ r ~~~-- ", ~~ ~ _f c ~% 7-"l~~ ~; -~ / U~ t ~~ ~~ ~~~ _~~~ ~ lrI ~f C~ ,c~c -zZ- .y- /~'~ ~. (LPL-~_~,~-tK; . ~%%~i/'~f y ~ ,;~ ~ ~- , y ~YTi ,~Y-„y'G~°Li ' y .. + /'~ I ~ ~" " L i 7 `ry{` ~ j~ _ ~~~: ~~''f 'r' L ,y-~r ,/ ~ ~1~~ U ~-/ Note to: Joe McNamara Fuzzy Minnix Butch Church Bob Johnson Harry Nickens From: Mary Allen Date: March 27, 2001 Subject: Sale of Lloyd Property The Christian Life Fellowship Church has contacted the Board members through a variety of methods to support the sale or exchange of the Lloyd property to the Church. Listed below is the number of CONTACTS, not the number of people who contacted the office. In some cases one individual would contact the Board 13 times as follows: (1) Sent 6 e-mails - 1 to all 5 Board members, and 1 to each board member; (2) then left 6 voice mail messages on our voice mail system - 1 for all 5 board members and a voice mail message for each Board member. (3) and then called on the phone and left his/her name Additionally a three member family would each contact the Board 6 to 13 times as shown above. Listed below is the number of contacts (not individual people) the office has received: Voice Mail: 180 Telephone: 132 E-Mail: 177 Personal Letters: 37 TOTAL CONTACTS: 526 ~ ~ i i ~~ ^J -, '~ ( . G ~~ ~~ .S ~~ / ~ ~ ~- t 1 ~' ~ L i ~ `~-~ ,~ ~ / /~ Co~9 Mo~e.~/ f S~ f f~,vg ~e5~a~ Asa ~ ~e ~ /~ es ~~ ~/e ~,v~ !_i ~ 2 WJ` ~ Cc~o~ /~a~ ~~ ~ ~ v ~ ~2 `f~ U /L7e~f~~9 %~~S dn-Y /~~~ f r Y ~. ,v ~j _ i ~ --~ `~ e S ~_~ /`/ /~ cl ~ ,~ iZ ~ a ~ N ~.i1 C~v~, r /~ ~f ~~ gre.~n~ ^~ fin/ % / ~ e. r ~. ~/~~1~ -Z U~~, ~= ~ ~ S ~~,, t ~1L~/o r ~ ~ o /°~l ~~ ~ ~ e ~- 1 ~ ~. ~~S 5~~~ o % /~ h ~2ivds ~-1 L ~/ ~ ~/ ~J ~ ~l -' ~-~ ~~ ~i `~ i~ ~Y ~~~~~ ~oa~il~ RJR Leo (4 ~~'s l7~ ~.~~' ~`~f~f/e l`'lo ~e W t~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ , v~ ~ l ~2f/e. ~~ ~ q~ S f v C~ f ~ c~5 \;~ ~~~ M~~n-~ ~~ ~y ~;Mes MAC ~° 8 ~Y ~~ Nh ~~~~K~~ c~~-~~~s g ~~ 2~~~~ ~v a~rv k+e.~ ~~. ,_- 6 J2 / ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ .V ~~ f ~~~~ s ~~~ 5~h ~2 s ~ f~ '~ S i_ c~ //off-, ~ , ~ 9 /-'~ E t ~, h ,,,~,,~;~ ,~ ,:~ ~~ f 4 ~_,. i I, ~~,~ .~1_ ~~ , ~ ~' N~ f:~'s' f^ 2 a ~, g lC., .u-~ C ~ ~ R ~.sr S ~ ~ ~ ~' 8 o a nr d~ V~ 4 '~t 01 y ~~ ` ~ e n ~ ~ e ~ s ~ ~ •/ fir. J-/n /~ r. ~ ~ ~vn~~~.~-q /~pS2 ~U0 ~uC,r7 b ~. ~ ~ y ~~~ ,~~ f 1-~ Y J3~. ~~ ~,~ ~ d~ v ~- ~ y to •v y «, ~o -~tid1~ ~~.~ 5 ~ ~ e. /~v s e ...3 ~,2 st~~ 1 e. ss ~o ~ c~a 1 ti' ~I ~-1 ~ -7 ~ ~" c~ N ~ v ~s 1 / S~~II c~o /~~-~ f'. S ~-~- •fe t7r~ . ~ ^~ ?, ~61~~ ~Cp~f!lll~~ ~-/o,~Z~ ~Jll~lP~~GSjr~o.~~d ~~i~ ~~~ ~~ Zil2l~ll~~ft2'~Cd/l e~lllG~ ~~-~~~a~ ~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~i~~r~~~s-lr~l~~~ ~~~iti~ t~ ti~cl`i~ ~~~a~~~ ~~ ~~s~`~ ~~x~ ~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~. ~~~ ~~ ~=~. p ~~ Gam, 2~~~ ~c~~ti-a~ ~t~~~6 ~a~~~~sr~o~a ~~~ ~..~~a~~ ~i~ri ,~j~°~e t~ ~~i~ ~jr~r,,a~~~ t~ ~a~ ~~~~~~~a .~~~~ ~9~Q~~~~ ~~~~~r~ ~l~n-.~~~"~'~r~~ ~r~o~~ ~a ~~ ~~x~ ~~~~~ ~~u ~,~~, ~~~ ~~ ~l~ ~`; sG~f~ Cam, ~~C~/l.1 J!!l/!-~~'GrI~GS~' ;< ~u~aic ~~~~c~ ~olrira~ ~s~sr.~~ ~o~rs~~~~cr~-~a~ ~~~iti~z t~ ~,~a~c~i~c ~~s~a.~~~ l~ ~~~~ ~~~~%~ ~Ci,~~~a~~~a~-~` ~a~~~~ ~a dry ~~~or ~~~ ~~,~c~ ~aa~~ ~~ull~ ~a~s~~~~~as:~ ~~~~ ~..~~a~~ ~., ~~e ~~~ ~a ~~i,~a~~~~~ c~~-aa~~ mix ~~~~~~~~~a ~~.~~~ ~~t`~~~~~~~t~ a~~~~~ ~t~.~~~~~~~~ ~~~~ to l/~ ~~x~ ~~~~~ ~~~~ ~is.,c~~r~,. ~~~~~ ~~t~~t ~o~r~~ ~s~.~~ ~a~j~~~~as~ r ~ • • ~£ /~~~ ~j ~`i b /)G L,a. //S ~~'~ ~ ~° .~ o ~ ,B ~ 9' . 2 <.J ~ ~~~u~~ y ~~~ 5. ~~ 7~ ~. ~~. ~~ ~~ ~3 /~ ~s ~~ ~~ ~~. ~~ a0 ~/. ~a ~ _ ~~ ~ ~-~ .~ ~.,n.~ ~ ,~ ~~~ ~~ ~o~nQ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~ a.5 a~ a7 a8 ~~~Z°~`~ P~ o_ ~~-~~ ~~t- '-~-'`- • • a~ .41~_ - ~ i ~ ~~ 33 ~-a.~0 3~ ~irnm,z.ct ~t~0 ~~ ~~ ~~ 3~ Q rna 3~ E~ ~~~, wi ~~ ~ 3 ~-dYr~ t~~'Fv~- ~~ ~~. ~~~ ~s c~~, v l~ w GJa~e.2~~ Y~ ~a G~~eCn~ v k 1~~a/~~.;. l~~~w~. 5u a CJ~c~, s3 G~-~-~.~ ~~~v sy C ss r.~a.~.j G~ s~ ~0 s~ ~ ~~- 5~d Q ~K~.~,_ S~ n %~ • • ~~~~ a ~. ~~,.. ~~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~.~ 7~-~~ ~~ D c3 ~"w~-~ ~~ ~~xa~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ..~ ~S ~ ~~ ~ .~ ~~~ ,- , ~ ~ ~~ `~ ~ ~~ ~~~. ~~ ~~ 2~~ ~~ ~ ,~~, ~~ ti~ f • ~~ ~-c~ ~~~x~.~ ~r'c1~'/Yn~. ~~~~ ~'~~~ 7~ ~ G 'r--~-6- ~oG ~~c~.,z,~.. ~~'~ 1 /b ~.. C ~~ ,t4~.-G-~ l /~ //3 //1` l~s /i~ ~~7 1~~ -~ ~ tao /ai ~,c- /.°32e~ . r~~ 7 ~2~e.~ .,. ~n~~ ~~ 1~-~- v ~~~~~ • • • ~~ y`7 k/ai9~~ 1 ~- ~~ ~: March 26, 2001 NOTE TO: Butch Church /8U Bob Johnson Joe McNamara Fuzzy Minnix Harry Nickens FROM: Brenda J. Holton SUBJECT: TEXT OF VOICE MAIL CONCERNING CHRISTIAN LIFE FELLOWSHIP CHURCH Below are the names of the people who left messaae on the voice mail for all of the supervisors and individual supervisors requesting that the Board vote for the sale or trade of the Lloyd Property to the church. I did not transcribe the messages as they were all basically the same. Most of them said that they would be seeing you at the Board meeting Tuesday night. ELMER HODGE -messages 2 Brian E.... William Scott Donna Hurd Betty Jenkins John Burgess Debby Minucie ALL MEMBERS -messages 54 Cathy D... Brian Lever Juju Myerhair Regina Martin Vickie Green Betty Clingenpeel K. Gonzalez Linda Wice - 989-5744 Robert Taylor Suzanne Hamilton Rene Hatcher Barbara Harris Carl Lee Easter Dorothy Hair Charles Hamilton Linda Humfrey Angela Taylor Charles Tom 389-0588 Patty McKinney Charles Minucie Jonathan Hatcher Patsy Harris Sandra Dill Worster Hurst (??) Richard Martin Louisa Menson Ernie Caldwell William Scott Becky Caldwell Donna Garrett Betty Jenkins Carvin Terrace Linda Trail Lisa Scott Lisa Francisco Lady did not leave her name Katherine Ray Dr. Michael Hoff Lynn Carter Eva Crizer Lorna Martin Robert Blackwell Danny Craft Nancy Francis Paula Brookens Frances Carr John Akers Teresa Willis Chris Moore Carlin Hoffman JOSEPH MCNAMARA - 44 messages Brian Weaver Betty Clingenpeel Linda Wise Suzanne Hamilton Barbara Harris Dorothy Hair Linda Humphrey Charles Tom Charles Minucie Ron Akers William Scott Garland Harris Lisa Scott Marty Blankenship Erma Blankenship Dr. Michael Hoff Carolyn Dixson Donna Hurd Debbie Minucie Vickie Green Rene Hatcher Carl Easter Charles Hamilton Angela Taylor Patty McKinney Sandra Deal Drema Wygale Waggle Ernie Caldwell Betty Jenkins Tery Northington Lisa Francisco Eva Crizer 2 Peggy Holly Danny Craft Nancy Francisco Rita Ratliff Paula Brookins Frances Carr Susan Sarver John Akers Teresa Willis Chris Moore Carlin K??? Brian Weaver BUTCH CHURCH - 15 messages Brian Weaver Dorothy Hair Linda Humphrey Chuck Conn Garland Hair Marty Blankenship Dr. Michael Hoff Erma Blankenship Charles Hamilton Peggy McKinney Drema Kygal -thank you for your kindness and support to minister Betty Jenkins Leon Hall Eva Crizer Peggy Holley BOB JOHNSON - 36 messages Brian Weaver Linda Wice Suzanne Hamilton Dorothy Hair Linda Humphrey Chuck Tom Charles Minucie Patsy Harris Lewis Harris 1 Ron Akers Vickie Green William Stutt Rene Hatcher Garland Harris Charlie Hamilton Lisa Scott Patty McKinney Marty Blankenship Drema Wygale Dr. Michael Hoff Ernie Caldwell Carolyn Dixon Debbie Minucie Donna Hurd Betty Jenkins Debbie Minucie Jerry Northington Dave B... Eva Crizer Rene Hatcher Peggy Hawley Charles Hamilton Rita Ratliff Angela Taylor John Akers Patty McKinney Chris Moore Drema Wygale Ernie Caldwell Linda Trail Catherine Ray Terry Northington Eva Crizer Peggy Hailing Lorna Martin Rita Ratliff Frances Carr John Akers Chris Moore' Karline Hoff HARRY NICKENS - 29 messaaes Brian Weaver Betty Clingenpeel Linda Wice Dorothy Hair Linda Humphrey Charles Tom Charles Minucie Ron Akers William Scott Garland Hair Lisa Scott Marty Blankenship Dr. Michael Hoff Carolyn Dixon Donna Hurd 3 ~rdl~e , ~/~ d yap ~ - ostr f - Win?// ~ ~1~~~~- ~'C cl~1K~~('~- o V~4 ~ y~1! J,~cV.PG..T_ ~-_ '_ ~ ~~~ -- _ ., . , 29~.D9 Morrison S~ree~ YCoanolce, Virginia 24®g4 ~/l6~-c/~. oZ. l~ , 01 ~o ~ ~Lc ,,. Vw~ • G~ I~I~. - ~I.. ~ ~. ~da~.~-~ ~~ ~2«e cP~ ~~ ~. ~ a ~ ~~«~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~, ~atxGn~c ~~ed~i%n 2930 Merino Dr. Roanoke, VA 24018 (540) 772-4688 CTrinabug@aol. com March 26, 2001 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Electric Rd. Roanoke, VA 24018 540-772-2005 Dear Board of Supervisors, To whom it may concern. 1 am a Roanoke County resident. I would like to express my support to the sale or trade of Lloyd properties to Christian Life Fellowship. I believe Christian Life Fellowship would be an asset to our community. I ask that the board please take serious consideration in approving Christian Life Fellowships offer for trade or purchase of the Lloyd properties. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, G L Catrina Medlin March 26, 2001 800 Colorado St. Salem, Virginia 24153 (540) 389-5111 Gentlemen My name is Elizabeth Martin and I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship in Salem. I am writing you in support of the sale and/trade of the Lloyd property to our church. I appreciate your consideration in this matter. I will see you Tuesday night at the meeting. Q.k,, G«+~,.,, ~CV ~._ ~- vw~ ~~ ~ S ~ ~~ C1 au,~,, w~ ~.~~ u - Q f' ~. ~ . ~~ _ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~wx `~' `~- ~,,~ ~ e~~o ' ~ f~ ooo~a /~'1 ~ S-~. .~ ~S~Q~~m (cam ~O1~0 /~ C..~ u~~1 ) ~ ~ w- t U `~~~~ c:W ~/~ _ 7 /- `- ~~ rmo ~. ~~~ G~ ~'.ev~ ~'oa~~v~ ~ ~ a.~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ .-~ ~ ~~ . ) , ~ uryn ~rc,u~:`~1 ~~~~ ok ~~.~~~J ~~ ~~ 1~~-/~S ~ ~~ ~ y~ ~~ ,~~ ~~ ~ . i f ~;, y., j~! ;~ ~ , ~., 'iY1Q~YK'C~ ,cam ~~c..vxa~ ~% , /~ a.K-d-~ a~- X33 s '~. ~ ~ .!~- ~ °~~L~xi, ~ ., ov~c~cr.E. ,C,~., ,LJLG[.l.~~ .LiJ(~ ~2t %~I~'.,t~ •~ZGi •Q~t.((,, 47ts` ~L+~C~/.l/Ca.~[~ `~i~axr-~Ee. C~c4c~c~ ax-~ ~ e~°.•~c~7'~<Llu~a.~~ yo . ~ ~~ ~~ y~, ~~- .1'u~.. ~ a-r~. ~,~~ " ~~ic~- U, J %1 ~i L, ~ Vic., Gam, ~-.._l~ l ~~ ~` ~. C {~ >~ ~ [ ~j ~ l/` > . . ~ - 1., ~. C E - i Lt..~.e -1 ~ Z.c YZ/ ~ -~~I :~1! 1-~n~'si~ ,~:L `~~~4-:~L'~L~ .-~f:.;~'1~r~L~(7.~.~~~L ~s~~~~~. ~/~ ~ : ~ ,, ~, a ~~_ .. ~% ~ ~~ ~ J L ~-/~E ~ ` o~C 1 L G. c _ _ , ~ %~ ~ /{ L ; LD`~~ L ~ / 1~~9 ..: L-1 r1 ~.'=~-. i ~ ;. ~/ ~_ _- ;~,/~ -~' G~`liL c tG~ f Z i ~ J~ ~ ~ ~ L~,'~d /iL. ~ ~' ~/7/lrl-~ ~~ ~ a ~~:.., ~, - ;~L y ~, ~ /~ n ~ f ,,`L ,ice L~ ~ L-L Go ~ - ! ~C-L~-L ~ i L-~ ~ ~- -~ `z- C ~ f~ -~ ~ ~ L ~ )~%~ ~~ y ~~c., ~. ~~~ ~.L2' 1 Lc'~,G,c;L ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ J ~~- ~ ~'~ /- ~~ `,~, !-~ ~ ~2'~''L-LPL- +~-~- _ G r1~'L;~- ,. / 2,L-~~5~'~y~'/ .,- ,~^ ~- ~~ ~ _ F h ~ _- L~21C" ~ ~ ~~L'1.... .{ ''~'~ ~~X: %~'" %~,,. 1./~L f ~ ~' ,/'r.CG '~ ~ L.G. ~~- // 7 v ~ ,.~ .•~ c/ `'~ ./~~-~' ILL-C~~~; ~ ~Z.~-~~'~'Z--' , a /~ _.> _ ~~ ~~ Lv`'~ l ~~ :mac. ~ ~;, ~C:~D ~ r ~' ;% r ~~ ~~ ~ r ~ ,. ` q3 ~ / /~ ~~ ,;i~J ~G+ %11L~6`LF., r~~1r :f c~(,(~['r.`c~- ~~~C-~~~'ZG 4~~~ryL ~~~1~'~.iC/ l yZ ~f.- ~ i ~ Z~` 1G((lf>~~t~~,.- -~LZ~~C-Ctt Ld l2~ ``{/`~~ ~',..e-E:~~~t.~/`~ `I-t,- c ,~,/, 7 ~!/l1 `/iL~~L .~.:L „~vi'C~ ~f tint it c''E,~ ~ '`,c ~~d L~~~ ~' ,c~//! - ~ ~--? . ~ ' ''11 '' J f ~. ~ - _~ _c1/l'L~~ /rG~~ ~~V}1/~/G(~t% .l~ ~~C..l.~ ;`,~C'G~Z'/G'/~ ,_~ ~~3v~L'V~~'/L~r, ~'` - ~~- / ~ J ~ / ~ ~ ~ . ~~G~LG~GCL <L-' ~~~ ~~~LL~x-~/~Lc.=,f7~ ~ ~/~vt%~1~~~. _ J ~ ~ i ~~ ,,~-~~ v7r'~-L..~` CSC. - ~ / `-C~ ,.•~ j ~~riG' /!//~L~t ~ j ~7.v J/9 ;"' L1,~LY-./ ~, L(.~L v ./vf"G.~-~' A r L~ ~~~~,E~ ~ C~ ~ G v l lam(-,~L? __ /°~, t /,~ i iL L ,// r ~ ~~CC~C~L~i~- - 1, v l jr ~~ r i (~ ~. ~ ~ ~~ ~='~ PLC `C~-~ ~ ~ / ~'`~-L%~ _,~%~ ~. ~ ~ l ~~i ~ ~ ~ ~~ c~ ~'<'L~~ nl//~.~C G%N//,,~'i~`c%~ /~flL . ,~ ~ (/ f i / . ~. ti_ ~ / Lv C~ L• l ~; v, ' ~__ ' ~~~ i ] ~~~ ~t~~-9iG'Y'~cA /._z'c}~+~-2,:~ ,i~a"' c~v1!;.1.E~%iLG^-GaZc~'li,L I/ i r ~, ,~ ~. y r ~; , - _ ~ ~ ~U L - ~ ~ ~ f l_.= ~ ;.~71 ~ ~;.~ ~ lJ2r: 112.~~-e'h~ :;~~-L C.~Ci~~.GGI~/ZU ~,~.L~ R-~"~[~~~~~LGC~?i /( ~1 ~~ ~~:" ,. / ~~,,~ ~i ~ ~.~ / ~,~ ~ /~ ~ ~~,~G ~ L eJ„~~Z.,~~ ~ /v2"'L/ ~ i~,r ~~i~y2~ ~Z~1~"%f L / 1 /a`L u j/`~li~-.:~G~ , ~ ~"Z- ~ ~~L / 1 i~-DLL- L.`C~"%~ ~Iti'G~i ~..L/ ~ f'c ~ t.~ _ o ,~~/~ ;~ - ., ~// ~, ~ j .~ ~'I ),J~ j~~~"~ ./Ul~~K_.~- -c` ~ ~-'vL L-t~ ~.~~Z'~~~ /,E:~/i ~'C~~~ ~/' ~i~ic~ ~, d ~,, v ~ t1 ! ,~ ~~' ~ ~~ ~L ,i , , G~ ~~`'l~~ti c~-- .. ~1 L-G''ZZ-k~ ,j~~jL i ~'c'~~~<lt~~ ~ ~~'~~.f~i ; ~ ~~L~ G~'~E~ -'C ~' rZ-`~~ .i'~Iz-L L C-~ ~L.~ - C.~- ~C ~al.~~-~- .iG-G G'~G L..~L~ l-`%~ !~~L ..G ~~~"' .~~~ i ~-~ ~~ ~Lr - ,~~j6t i%G ll.-C_/zl' ~: ~~f L ,-~C..~ .~ L~~.C-c ~L~ ~ „~- ~ ~ ~ , , ~- f% ~J~r'~~ ~G. ~r--Z,i.1 ,!!~'~- ~~-J7SZ~'L. ,,G~G~1~Z~E..~ ,~.~ //~ C~il~[C~~iZI`f~%L . N J ~ f c/ ;~~ J ~_ ~,, ~, jCG `~~~GL~ ~ cc, ~C~ ~' ~~ i; ~ G~~ i , h ~~ '~ _ 1 ~ ~lti C.~ / ` / r 'inc.'' ~/ ~ ~~-~/ C.. L~ ` k , /G'L / I ~t// -/ ~L,- ~ L t, ~~c' , ,: . ,, ;> ~ - ~ ,.2 Z `fir-~ i f ,~~Lz~ ,~:c " , _' ~"z- .~- j~~' ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'L'~~ ~C ~.. ~c1~t ~ C.~ ~ ~ ~ ./ ~ x. ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~- ~E% f 72~ .~~~ 1i'~~- vC;,~Lke ~~G ,~._ ~" ~ ~" ~ /:~L~"L;;7 'f r ~~ ~ iJ/ ~~,~~~~ L~ d ~-4aC~G~: i LLB-,~~/,.~ ~~Lr -~ ~ ~~'~=. G 'U~~~1 -~c~.~~ l~ ~ ~ Zc ~ J~ ' ,i , ~f ,k ~ _ ~.~, ~1~ ~ l ~~ /~ ~, ~'~,~~ ~ ,t-~;~, ~ _-Li /~"Lt~ ., ~~~ /Ivy ~1 ~'i~,/~~%l~2'l(L~l L ~~ ~ ~ c_ ~~,.L~~ ~-~'Y~ r ~ , ~. ~ ~~ ~~ ~~i ~~ 'J~z~z~L~ ~~ t t ;Y- ~,, ,~ ,I u / / ~~-- ~ ;~/ G ` / l L ,1c~ l 11211 l ~Lr;%"t- -- ~'--~ ~ `~ lG 7~-JiL `~t i c.-% ~ 'c~ " - 1 ~ ~~~Li41~u. ~" ~ ~~ ~ .~ ~` -liL'`~L-Z,L, I ~~j ..,ELL ~,L _ ~~/~ ~G1 Z ~%i//' ~_ .: ~ ~~ ,~~?~ ~2.~- ,% ~ , /t~ ~ "~// 1, ~-~~ ~~~~~( ~ f-'~,~ ~1/L~ ,~~'`~-C'~ I~~GLGC=~~' ~ ~~/ rLL (~C./ !~iY~ ~L/~~[7~~ ~~G'~/ :/L.!'~ri.'L ~~~i l ~ 11 v t ~~ ~. ~ G'~, ~ ~r izZE~i ~.L-1'L~i ~«'~~G~~~Z (.~:~7~ .. C,~ ,, ° a'~~~~.-~~~L L~[6~ ~ G~~. L~ L , _~__.~~_- ,~~ 1- n .-~- ,~Gct-', ~, ~~~%f LE~~c.. t~ ,,~,~~- ,~~~ i`~~ J 1~L~~~ - ,/L~1'1,~ ~Zl.~: ~,iC~ ~:1~; _ ~C.rL G °~ ' _~ C ,- ~ _ _ „~ ., ,_ ~yi ~~// /, ,/ ~,~j , L~LG,L c ~~ (' l~ ,~ "t i `'`fiL l ~ ~ ..._~ _.~aUC-~~'~.~~. - ~' C.. ~ Gtl~ ~~~ ~ ' _ L't-~ r~ ~ ' ~~ .~~~-C~G~~Z Z . ~- / , ,. „ ~, ~. , < ;,' ~ _~ y7i~~ u l- 19 Z~°Z `" L°ZvZ yL i it Lam. ~t I/v~ ~~~~~//1 ~C~'~~'~ . :~ ~~ ~~ ~ t~~7 2r:~%Zr::%~;~ _ -7 ~~ ~ !~7 ~~~ '~,~ ~~D~ L ~----77-~ ~./ 1..,.~~.~~7'l~,F;~. ~ ~.z~L fl:~r;' ~ `-~GjjL~~2~ c:i~r C~,(~. ~~NL~1Cf' ~~-' .~ (~ ~~ ~ ,! ,- ~;~ ~~ ~,~ ~ .~ , ~~~ /~Z .:~2,. ~~TZe~1J,~C~~iL .2'~-~`- ~ ~f~-~~,L~cl~ 6.~' ~ ~~:,~~ ",~_ ~L~~t~k/t~~-;(L -: f, ~~~ ~ ~ .: , ~f ~ / . ~ `, -~- "L_ ~ i/ v t _~_;,~J ~ ,, f t ~~ c/ ~ ~ --`~~L %~~~ ~' .- f ~~~Ll~ 1'~~~~ ~ 1JAY L'i LC~ ti.'~~ J '~`~~/il.~~,"" L~,6L /G"~~'C.~-~~~~ y~~.~L ~.t.~~L~ v~G //L~G,L~YL' , ~~- i~`C~~r~E~i „~:d,~~tL~l'l. G:~' ~/~. ~~~ l ~ ~ --+ - , `/r- -- , r ~ -- U -o- c, ~ __ f~ ~ ~.~,~c.~~:-Lr~~~;~. ~._., G / n ~, ~~/ i ~~y/~G/1~~.~,~~>~~Z- /l~~ ~ ~~' .~L~/~'~ ~,~~//~- C~~i~lCc-LE-~C~G~fU ~/ ~~ ,~ I / ~ ~ ~; ;~ /i~Tl'll ~~~ ~~G`~ ~~.~ ~~~~ /~~ Gv G~ z ~~~~~ ~rL 'l ~~ ~ ~r l..- r ., A ~^ c r r ~~ ~~~~~L~~ ~~~~~ 2 ~~ ~` ~3.~~ ~~ ~~~~~~~ ~ ~~ ,~//~ ,~- .~ ~~ a ~~ ~%~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ z ~~~~~ ~- ~~~ l' ~ ~ f ~~~~C ~~ /~u .~, , ~~~~~~.~ ~~~ ~ ZZ d ~~~ ~~~ `~ ~ ~/ /~ ~~~ L " 2 .,/iLl ~~" / 6y L 2or y,~~u~~cz G"~'~c ~' ~~y ~1h~ ~~"~ C~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~ {r~~ ~-~. ~~2~~ ~ :~~ ~~~~ ~`" G / lG~ lnG'~ ~ ~~ / , ~` ~,~,~. ,~ ~~G~G G~~ ~y~~ ~~ -.~~~ ~~~ r ~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ -~ 1/~' r-= ~~~' ~~G~L ~ ~~~Zl G~~ ;fir ~~,~ ~~l ~~~ i~~'~ ~ ~ ` s -~ ~2~ ~~~~~'~~ ~ ~ :~ y ~ ;- ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ .~~ ; ~,~/~~ ~~2n~ G'', ~ ~~ ~~ -~ ~ G ~~,~ '~. ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~.~~~ /~~~ ~ ,:101~1~re~j%~r ~< ~~~71~~z ~~ ~' ~~a~ -~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~, ~ ~r~~%~ 9 / Jj~ ~~GG~ ~~-~?~ ~ ~ ~y~~ ~ GL~~~ ~~~~ ~.~ 5 ~ lz~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~z ~- ,, - ~~ ~~~ ~. ~ w .~~ %~ti~,'~ ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~ C~,~-2 - ~ ~ 7i~ ~~~ ~ ;~ ~~~ /~j~ ~~~~ s~ z ~~~~~ G~ ~~~~~7 L G~ Z ~ ~j ~ ~ ~~- ~~~1 .~ ~ ~~li ~. ~ ~~ ~ 7 z ~~. . _~Af ~ ~ .~ f,( ~ / ~~~ ~~ ~f ~ ~~ ,, . , . ~ ~~~-~~ ~~-~ ~~ r ;~ ~~ ~- ~ ~ :~~ r ~' ~ ~~~~i' : ~~ ~~~ ~~~~ C~ n r ~ 2~~ i .~ .._,/ ,~ ~' ~i~~~r~~~>~~~1~_ ~' ~7~~ ~ ~~ ~/ <~~~ ,~ ~, ~~,~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~T~~ ~ ~ _ ~ .~, ~; ~~~ ~~ .~~~~ ,~ ~ ~~ ;-~ ~ ~~ ~j/ ~~ ~~1~ ~ ~~~;~1~` ~~ ~/ ~~ ~ . ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~~~ ,~j~~ ~~~o ~ ~;~ ~~G (~ ~~' ~/~" ~ Z ~ ~~ .~ Gam ~~ G .~ -~~z~~~ ~ ~--~ ,. C ~~ ~~~~ ~~, t `' ~~ ~z~~~. r ~~ ~~ , ~ ~~~ ~ ~~~z ~" ~~. ~ ~ ~ - ~-~ ,~~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~ ~~~~ /~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~,~-~-~ , c~ ~ ~~ ~~ Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Dear Sirs, 3-27-01 I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship located at 4335 West Main St ,Salem, in Roanoke County. The church desires to purchase the Loyd property, owned by Roanoke County, but located in the City of Salem. I understand that the sale of this property creates an advantageous tax situation for the county, and we believe that owning this property is advantageous to our church. Please vote approval of this sale at Tuesday's board meeting. I plan to see you there. Sincerely, ~~~~ Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Dear Sirs, 3-27-01 I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship located at 4335 West Main St ,Salem, in Roanoke County. The church desires to purchase the Loyd property, owned by Roanoke County, but located in the City of Salem. I understand that the sale of this property creates an advantageous tax situation for the county, and we believe that owning this property is advantageous to our church. Please vote approval of this sale at Tuesday's board meeting. I plan to see you there. Sincerely, ~~ G ~o~ 3-27-01 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Dear Sirs, I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship located at 4335 West Main St ,Salem, in Roanoke County. The church desires to purchase the Loyd property, owned by Roanoke County, but located in the City of Salem. I understand that the sale of this property creates an advantageous tax situation for the county, and we believe that owning this property is advantageous to our church. Please vote approval of this sale at Tuesday's board meeting. I plan to see you there. Sincerely, `~n;~,~ 3/~6~0~ ~w~,~ . , ,;.,, a ,_ .. ~! ~J/y r~N. ~ Fsrz~ ~/ ~ ., ~ ~ G ' zr~~e l i:w.~ri„~f c~~ a Xily ~ CLl° ~~ J ~ i ~.-.,~t y ~PlKt~ u,~e•~~;~et. ;i. ~~y . ~~.; ~~ ~; / ~ ~ ~~ ~~ I ~ I -.~~,~,~ J ~~ 7 V~ V ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD of SUPERVISORS; Mr.Bab Johnson, tIaliins Distract Mr. Joseph B.Butch Church, Catawaba District Mr. Joseph t'.11dcNamara, Windsor llilis Mr. H. Odell Minnix, Cave Spring District Dr. Harry C.1Vicken, Vinton District March Z6, 2UU1 Gentlemen, My name is A. Dewayne Sarks, Jr. and 1 am a member o#SChristian Life r'ellowship at 4335 West Main Street Salem, Virginia which is in Raanake Cauniy. I am writing this letter in support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life ~ellawship. 1 drank that the trade would be a goad mane fhr Raanake County as well as the Church. A trade will beneft the county far years to come in added cammamity property ar business tax dollars. 1 will see you'lbesday night at the meeting. Sincerely, ~,, A. Dewayne Sarlcs, Jr. 1101 Penmar Avemie Southeast Roanoke, i~irginia X4013 ROANOI~E COUNTY BOARD of SUPERVISORS: Mr.Bob Johnson, Hollins District Mr. Joseph B.Butch Church, Catawaba District Mr. Joseph P. McNamara, Windsor HillB Mr. H. Odell Minnix, Cave Spring District Dr. Barry C. 1Vicken, Vi~on District March fib, $t1U1 GBIItlemen, lily name is Bonnie H. Underwood and 1 am a member of~C:hristian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street Salem, Virginia which is in Roanoke County. I am writing this letter in support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Lie Fellowship. 1 think that the trade would be a goad move for Roanoke County a,s well ae the Church. A trade will benefit the county for years to come in added comm~mity property or business ta~c dollars. 1 will see you'1'uesday night at the meeting. Sincerely, ~~~'~~ Bonnie H. Undenvaod 1101 Penmar Avenue Southeast Roanoke, Virginia 24013 Clifford V. Hawley 1385 Longview Road, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 March 26, 2001 Dr. Harry C. Nicken, Vinton District Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Building 5204 Bernard Drive, S.W., 4`" floor Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear Dr. Nicken: I am a resident of the Cave Spring District. My name is Peggy Hawley, and I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street, Salem, Virginia which is in Roanoke County. I am writing this letter in support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. It appears to me that the trade of the Lloyd property would be a good move for Roanoke County as well as the church. A trade will certainly benefit the county for years to come in added community property or business tax dollars. I will see you Tuesday night at the meeting. Sincerely, .~ A C ' cLV. }fawle~y Clifford V. Hawley 1385 Longview Road, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 March 26, 2001 Mr. H. Odell Minnix, Cave Spring District Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Building 5204 Bernard Drive, S.W., 4~` floor Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear Mr. Minnix: I am a resident of the Cave Spring District. My name is Peggy Hawley, and I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street, Salem, Virginia which is in Roanoke County. I am writing this letter in support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. It appears to me that the trade of the Lloyd property would be a good move for Roanoke County as well as the church. A trade will certainly benefit the county for years to come in added community property or business tax dollars. I will see you Tuesday night at the meeting. Sincerely, ~ ~. Cli~(v~aL V. }f awle~y ~- Clifford V. Hawley 1385 Longview Road, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 March 26, 2001 Mr. Joseph P. McNamara, Windsor Hills Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Building 5204 Bernard Drive, S.W., 4`t` floor Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear Mr. McNamara: I am a resident of the Cave Spring District. My name is Peggy Hawley, and I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street, Salem, Virginia which is in Roanoke County. I am writing this letter in support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. It appears to me that the trade of the Lloyd property would be a good move for Roanoke County as well as the church. A trade will certainly benefit the county for years to come in added community property or business tax dollars. I will see you Tuesday night at the meeting. Sincerely, ~~ (7 ~ J ~~ c~ v. ~A,wl~y Clit~ord V. Hawley 1385 Longview Road, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 March 26, 2001 Mr. Joseph B. Butch Church, Catawba District Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Building 5204 Bernard Drive, S.W., 4th floor Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear Mr. Church: I am a resident of the Cave Spring District. My name is Peggy Hawley, and I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street, Salem, Virginia which is in Roanoke County. I am writing this letter in support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. It appears to me that the trade of the Lloyd property would be a good move for Roanoke County as well as the church. A trade will certainly benefit the county for years to come in added community property or business tax dollars. I will see you Tuesday night at the meeting. Sincerely, ~~`f~ Cl%{fo~rcLV. }fawle~y Clifford V. Hawley 1385 Longview Road, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 March 26, 2001 Mr. Bob Johnson, Hollins District Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Building 5204 Bernard Drive, S.W., 4'h floor Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear Mr. Johnson: I am a resident of the Cave Spring District. My name is Peggy Hawley, and I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street, Salem, Virginia which is in Roanoke County. I am writing this letter in support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. It appears to me that the trade of the Lloyd property would be a good move for Roanoke County as well as the church. A trade will certainly benefit the county for years to come in added community property or business tax dollars. I will see you Tuesday night at the meeting. Sincerely, ~ ~ ~{ c~ v. ~E~,i,~y Peggy L. Hawley 1385 Longview Road, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 March 26, 2001 Dr. Harry C. Nicken, Vinton District Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Building 5204 Bernard Drive, S. W., 4th floor Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear Dr. Nicken: I am a resident of the Cave Spring District. My name is Peggy Hawley, and I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street, Salem, Virginia which is in Roanoke County. I am writing this letter in support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. It appears to me that the trade of the Lloyd property would be a good move for Roanoke County as well as the church. A trade will certainly benefit the county for years to come in added community property or business tax dollars. I will see you Tuesday night at the meeting. Sincerely, ~~y ~. ~cau,tey Peggy L. Hawley 1385 Longview Road, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 March 26, 2001 Mr. H. Odell Minnix, Cave Spring District Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Building 5204 Bernard Drive, S. W., 4th floor Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear Mr. Minnix: I am a resident of the Cave Spring District. My name is Peggy Hawley, and I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street, Salem, Virginia which is in Roanoke County. I am writing this letter in support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. It appears to me that the trade of the Lloyd property would be a good move for Roanoke County as well as the church. A trade will certainly benefit the county for years to come in added community property or business tax dollars. will see you Tuesday night at the meeting. Sincerely, ~~ ~~ ~. ~~~ Peggy L. Hawley 1385 Longview Road, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 March 26, 2001 Mr. Joseph P. McNamara, Windsor Hills Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Building 5204 Bernard Drive, S. W., 4th floor Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear Mr. McNamara: I am a resident of the Cave Spring District. My name is Peggy Hawley, and I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street, Salem, Virginia which is in Roanoke County. I am writing this letter in support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. It appears to me that the trade of the Lloyd property would be a good move for Roanoke County as well as the church. A trade will certainly benefit the county for years to come in added community property or business tax dollars. I will see you Tuesday night at the meeting. Sincerely, ~~ ~~ ~. ~~~ Peggy L. Hawley 1385 Longview Road, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 March 26, 2001 Mr. Joseph B. Butch Church, Catawba District Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Building 5204 Bernard Drive, S. W., 4~` floor Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear Mr. Church: I am a resident of the Cave Spring District. My name is Peggy Hawley, and I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street, Salem, Virginia which is in Roanoke County. I am writing this letter in support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. It appears to me that the trade of the Lloyd property would be a good move for Roanoke County as well as the church. A trade will certainly benefit the county for years to come in added community property or business tax dollars. I will see you Tuesday night at the meeting. Sincerely, ~x~.`.."~~' Peggy L. Hawley 1385 Longview Road, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 March 26, 2001 Mr. Bob Johnson, Hollins District Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Building 5204 Bernazd Drive, S.W., 4~' floor Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Deaz Mr. Johnson: I am a resident of the Cave Spring District. My name is Peggy Hawley, and I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street, Salem, Virginia which is in Roanoke County. I am writing this letter in support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. It appeazs to me that the trade of the Lloyd property would be a good move for Roanoke County as well as the church. A trade will certainly benefit the county for years to come in added community property or business tax dollars. I will see you Tuesday night at the meeting. Sincerely, C~~'$- ~ ~ ~~ ~. ~t~ r~a~ ~D ~~ ~~2ti~.~LVt~~ , /Yl~~/ ,G ~~ -~ c~~~~ ~ ~ 335 ~;~~/~~, ~ ~~ ~~~ .p ~~}'y(„ J .,,~,,~~.hc,G~~~ ~~.~ c,a~ .,lilt,, ~- v ~~~ ~~ ~~'~"~ _ -~-~. ~ / v V//y~ i ~ h l'Tl%/'~/Y, ~ .. ~ n //~~- G~~/ q ` 1j r ` r r~ ~ sit ~ ~-..~~ -~ C~ ~^ -e ~u,. ~ 2r ~ ~~ 4 L" ~'C' fZ~ ~ --.1 .S' r {' e ~ .~~ L t~ n..~ ~/c~ - w Li + ~- Gi ~~ S' r 1Y ~T O ? ~{d ~~c L~~~~~ -~~ . // ,[f ~`~ / / f r •~ /l~ ~ti P T~, ~.~ ~ f ,~ ~~~-~ ~, ,~ °d'~'ri' W ~~..~ ~ ~~ ~i L~ V ~ Z. -Y ~ LJ .~ 3 ~' ~ E/ C ~ sr U ~J ~ ~% ( /> Cl ~~( ~C'I ~:-c'J {~J C ~ ~,. rv~ty v~ L` L~ r . ~"~2 .r ~r`~-~' ~e C ~ oc.i.f~•~' • / r ~-I ~ c~ r ^f L y , ` ! ~ E' f' ~'lS~ ~L. z I ~~ ~. 2 .C d ~~ l..= :l k ~./l J p J~~ ~~ ~ k Gy~~. r/~.y ~iK ~ti 1~`-~~~ -~,+ ~ ~ ~ '~- .• i ~t ,oo,~c,1L~ Co • ~c~s~ off" 5~,;~ so~-s ~~ . `~06 So~-~so~ ~, c-. J o S c~k ~ ~ v~ ~~xC~ rit r • 1~ ~u M',nn- ~P m no-me ig ~av~-G ~©C~~,r~-~l . . 0.c\ ~ o. M a M ~M~ er p~ C.~c- - s~ .o. c1 ~.',~C' e~ ~e,~~o~s~~~ a~'C `~3 3 5 t,Je,s~t I'~a,n cJ~CS'GG~ ~c~~M ~/o~ t,J~,~~C~, 1 S ~1(1. ~nO~F, °~ . c o ~ ~~ . ~. ~o ~~ ~ ~;~~ ~ o ~ a~a ~~. .~ \ i'~ C~, ~ r C,~- C~.ri 5\ i oc~ 1.,,'-~ e.. e~\ pcJ 5h i , G rer,.~ '~ c~- ec,. ro`c' ~~.e, Co~61~ ~Co ~r~~ ~'~e ~~c, ~- ~r© ec~ IC,eCr~~~ a \ `~ `~'r'c~GC~ t.~~~d gene '-~ ~~~ ~v~ ~o~' ,c"p ~ ~~c..r or U ~~ - n X55 ~~ c1~o~\o.S'S l5en/f~e ~i~a,' ~-~7. o~ CSHLc'rr~~ Cl~J ~/ a3 ~i9-n/~,~~ ~'our/~. .L'-~~ u1~i~~r9T~~~s l~rr",~ i~ ~u~,~~t ,~ ~~~7-~Ie ~~~a~c Q~~c 11 c~ ~~ ~ ~,-T'~'° ~ y ~ ~ Y GfJo aZLb ,~c~ ~ ~T' f~~c1e L~iCl ~ f6i,~/G'r~ =~Pi~/~~~7' C'd~ t! r~7~y ~j~~ ~c~a~.5 /~ ~~~?r~/ ~RD~ .~~ JC%~minc~rn/aI` P~', ~/~T ~2 ~ U.s~o~~,:~ ~~ ~ y ~ y oc~~~.~ ~~ ~~~r, ~I. ~~~ ~,~~ rx , C~~~~~~ ; ~~~T~3~ -r ~~,~ y ~~ ~~-~-2-- TO: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Dear Sirs: My name is Phyllis Clark and I att;,ndee the Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street, Salem, Va. which is in Roanoke County. My purpose in writing you is in the support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to CLF. I think the trade of the Lloyd property would be a good move for the Roanoke County as well as the Church. I hope you will vote in favor of this move. I will see you Tuesday night at the meeting. Thank you. Sincerely, Phyllis Clark March 26, 2001 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors: Mr. Bob Johnson, Hollins District Mr. Joseph B. Butch Church, Catawaba District Mr. Joseph P. McNamara, Windsor Hills District Mr. H. Odell Minnix, Cave Spring District Dr. Harry C. Nicken, Vinton District Gentlemen: My name is Benny Maxey and I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street, Salem, VA which is in Roanoke County. I am in support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. I feel that it would benefit Roanoke County as added community property or tax revenue as well as a good move for the Church. I will see you Tuesday night at the meeting. Sincerely, ~ ~ rn~ Benny H. Maxey March 26, 2001 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors: Mr. Bob Johnson, Hollins District Mr. Joseph B. Butch Church, Catawaba District Mr. Joseph P. McNamara, Windsor Hills District Mr. H. Odell Minnix, Cave Spring District Dr. Harry C. Nicken, Vinton District Gentlemen: My name is Betty Maxey and I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street, Salem, VA which is in Roanoke County. I am in support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. I feel that it would benefit Roanoke County as added community property or tax revenue as well as a good move for the Church. I will see you Tuesday night at the meeting. Sincerely, ,~ / ~-~V Be H. Maxey 1. ~xh~ ~2~ , pool ~~'k ~'~h-c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~f ~ ~ t ~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ a ~P ~ ~ ~,/ ~~ ~ ~ 2~ o~ / uf~ Q ~Yr~9 C~h~ ~ ~/ ,~~- ~»7f ~c7 e% c4' ~ ~ ~r `C9 ofJ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ , ' ~~ ~ f~ ~ ~ ~e~ ~ ~ , ~~ ~ -> f'c~' ~@ ~Y a/h~ r`~ h~:~~' ~ ~ ac:Z ~E:Qc~ ~ ~/ ~ ~4/~a~'f, ~~u£h. ~~iuE ~ oi~e~ ~~ - .~~ ~~ ,, ~ ~~e~'ffh. ec~r~C~~ aE, ~ ~ L ~ `~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ /, r ~ ~~ a 4, ~J ~c ti~'c~rl `p E c~ ,~ E ~;rl C~ ~ £-,~ ~ c~ a.~ a rrr~ <~ry~ / o ,, C~ ~- 6~ufo~f~~r c~un ' ~(,~ ~~f~~~ (~, ~ ~ ~, ~ I ~ ( ~ Z, ~"~ l T ~~f t0i~'~ !~ ~rt;~ ~~, ~ ~ £rr~ ~ ° atL_~ ~~' ~ CJ U/ '~,~U1 ~. W71~ !/ Lou/ ~"~~c.~L~ % c~`. (( / (l ~ // u c ~ ~~ ~~ / ~ ~ ~E ~.~ ~ t~~~., c~ f ~~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~ ~,~E~~ c~ ~,~~ '~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `- c~. ~ m a~ a L ~ `f' -, .~ ~ ,. ~~l~~~i d~rJ .~0~ ~'6' n~rJ~irJ C~LG rl~ ~4J Eli ~~J rr) ~~' c~ c~c.ck~ ~ ~j l ~ ~ r /', °~ t~ y-~ ~l ~~ ' ,-~-rj~7,>7 c'rj ~~.~~ ~ ~~ ~, ~~,~ of ~ ,~~: a `~u~i ~5~~r~;tc~~ ~j h ~~ .~j ~~-c~7~ ~j~ ~~ t %~ ,, ~; ~ ~ ~ s ~J ~'~`c 5`' ~.~/~~ ~'. e ~,-~~ aL }'~ o~n d~~'1' CE:. ~ ~~ (9~r ~; ~~ ~ ~ cy~J ;C~. t'. / a / ~ // ~ ~ ~ ( / L'rl %L' ~°~:1~ ~ ~7 ~-~ C ~,~ d~~n d ~/]~ C c,~C.C ~ ~" E ~ ~J h ~7 d~c, a/~ CL~ 2~/ o~ / ~f ( ~ c ~ ,~.cs-rr ~ ~~' ~~~~ ~? ~111t~71 ~1~ c?-~~ e~r~ F:~c~r1 c~' ~ ~ ~ u,h..C'_~ ~ o fJ~'1? C,C@. t(9' ' ~~ ~C. V ~n C: /Gd` ,~ lCy~~~/~ ~, ~ ~ ~/I"1 ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~4~:~~ ,/")ay2;~ X~ ~f'~~ c~pp/`c.~CJ ~ C~2'~ ~~ o~d7~ '7~~ i~ C~-f/CE'_ L~ (~ Fh.~, ,rn~J r ~ ~.~ '' ~Yn~ C~ C~,~c ~ c~ ~'~ cRC.c~ ~~ L ~ k.E~ ~; rl c~ Cc3 y~ ~c~ f Ern) o ~° ~ ~ ~ r ~. ~ ~ ~DL ~~L ~~ ~ ~ ~ (a c~ ~~ ~ ^ n ~ ~ ~n tm v4~f, u~' ~' ~ ~ ' ~i ~ ~~ ~~, ~ h.~ £~~. ~ ~ act ~~ ~hk~ ~~_, ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ (~ ~ 4 (' ~,~ J c~1r1 ~ J~.l c~,/ l aY /~,c~ c~` ~ c~/7 UY c~ ~ C_0 ~~ ~ .y 9~ o ~ ,j~ b ~ ~ ~ o ~®' ~~.~ ~ ~~C / UZ~ ~ ~ Ur l o~2,f~i4., ~6' ,f CC~~(1~T~ ~ ~,' ~_,~. °v L' ~?7 l~'>7 ~~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ z~ ~ c~ ~'r~ ~~~ E' cy ~ ~ d` ~ d"Z U Ga'7) ~J ~ C,(./fLL ~`1 /~I CY ~` .~ C (,?~ c9-~ c~.X-~t-(-c1~. ~ 1 f ~~~7~t/ C c~ ~ ~~.,'~~ ~7 ~ „4, C.~ ~~' ~` QY,2' c~ ~ - _ ca~,~ N ~{d ~ f p h ,~ ~l ~ ~' l ~ ~, ~~ 1 LLl ~~ ~ ~c10 ~.,! ~j ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ c~Un ~ ~ cs~ ~'; ~~ ~c~.~h. ~ ' Eirr~ E`er 1 ~'i C. ~~~ ~ , ~' ay ~ /fir Cz[ i~~ ~ ~ ~/~'.7(.j/~ ~1 c~'~ ~ /~.F ~ ~' _,~ 0~~~ ~, ~'~. ~..~) ~rrJ /`//yf[y~/ A J~ ~ U /y' ry ~ c l l L Y~ ~J l (/' 7 % U l' y 1 .~C.X,/ ~~~ ~/~c.C,~TI ~~ 3L ~ ~C,L~c. ~ IY~C~ ~`7 /LG+~i' l a`t ~ ~.L~ l`~~~. ,~) c"~,l~s l~ C/L' ~,~y~ GCcl~i _~ ~~'~ ~c9~, ~~/~y CC ~.J u-E,~ C~, ~ p ~~~~~ c~ ~~ E:,~~E~7 C ~ e ~~E, -~l ~Y~ h~~~ ~E ch o~ ~ ~ '~= / (x Syr ~. ~ ~e' ~ C? m) C.[ ~ c ~ ~ cP~c.i' v /`~v /`~ GY~1oL E"~.~ ~'~~ ;~ ,I ( G A I ~JJ~',~~Y f C~,~ h~ E ~ ~E .7') l,Gr~ ~~.C~t.~a~-~L E:Cf~ d` /r, ~~~ ~f~~ ~~ ~~. ~ ~ ~~, ~,~ E a~ ~ f ,y ~.~ -~~Y2"F1 ~~EJf'r~ ~~ E'i,~,C~ fl ~°rJ~Y~. C'~ (~(1~ ' ~ a7.rnl / '~9' irr~ ~ , 1 ( ~~ r n u' a ~.1, ~ u '1 r7l G 1 ~~ ~ u1 ~ ~J (.k'.F, ~J ~C~ U~ rnl ~~ ~~r~ ~ ~p /~ , ./ ~ tom, ~ ~; c~~ c:~. ~'~ ~~ earl ~ ,~ ~m C~ c~~ ~' ~ c~~ ~: ~~ `~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~;r.~C`f Cv'G°~ ~ r r~~ ~ ~~ ' ~~ ' ~ ~~ ~-~ ~ ~ »~ ~` ~d ~ ~ ~~' e ~~'~ E ~, ~ ~~, cm> > ~.t~.~ t ~' ~a .~ ~~ ' c~tc t~7 c~c~.,~ ~ ~,~~~ ' ~; ~h~'~~ /Y ~~ ~ ~ f ~ ~ qtr uh ~ i ~,~ ~~r) ;~~-~~ii.~e~c~ Un P ~~ n l ~ °~ ~ ~~~~~c~~ ~~ r zBoard of Supervisors - (no subject) Page 1 From: <Bugs2dogs@aol.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Tue, Mar 27, 2001 1:33 PM Subject: (no subject) Gentlemen, Our names are Ken and Charlotte Hawley, we are members of Christian Life fellowship at 4335 West Main street, salem, va, which located in roanoke county. We are writing this letter in support of the sale and or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian life fellowship. it seems to me that the trade of the Iloyd property would be beneficial for roanke county as well as our church. a trade would benefit the county for many years to come as far a taxes are concerned. We are sure our new church building would be a great asset to the Iloyd property community also. thanks for your vote in support of this matter. Thank you! Ken & Charlotte Hawley 3-27 ~ '7 7 zBoard of Supervisors -Christian Life Fellowship purchase of Lloyd property Page 1 From: <Christina_D_Linkenhoker@AtlanticMutual.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Tue, Mar 27, 2001 12:33 PM Subject: Christian Life Fellowship purchase of Lloyd property To: Mr. Bob Johnson, Mr. Joesph B. Church, Mr. Joseph P. McNamara, Mr. H. Odell Minnix, Dr. Harry C. Nicken Gentelemen, my name is Christina Linkenhoker and I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street in Salem Virginia which is in Roanoke County. I am also a Roanoke County resident I am writing this letter in support of the sale or trade of the Lloyd Property to Christian Life Fellowship. I feel the sale or trade would be beneficial for both parties involved. I ask that you would vote in favor of the sale or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. Thank you, and I will see you tonight at the Roanoke County Board of Supervisor's meeting. Sincerely, Christina Linkenhoker ~zBoard of Supervisors -Support of Sale of Property Page 1 From: <HFCRB@aol.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Tue, Mar 27, 2001 12:21 PM Subject: Support of Sale of Property To: Mr. Bob Johnson,Hollins District Mr. Joseph B Butch Church,Catawba District Mr. Joseph Mcnamara, Windsor Hills Mr. H Odell Minnix, Cave Spring Dr. Harry Nicken, Vinton District Gentlemen, my name is Robert Bowers and I am a resident of the Hollins District and a member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street Salem Virginia which is in Roanoke County. I am writing this letter in support of the sale of the Lloyd propery would be a good move for Roanoke County as well as the church, A trade will certianly benefit the county for years to come in added community property or business tax dollars. I will see you at the meeting Tuesday night. Robert (Bob) Bowers ~i zBoard of Supervisors - Page 1 ~ From: Karen Keesee <KKeesee@petroleummarketers.com> To: "'BOS@CO.ROANOKE.VA.US"' <BOS@CO.ROANOKE.VA.US> Date: Tue, Mar 27, 2001 11:45 AM To whom it may concern, My name is Karen Keesee and I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street Salem, Virgina which is in Roanoke County. I am writing in support of the sale/trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. I believe this to be a good move for both the church and the county. This will benefit the county with added community property and business tax dollars. I urge you to vote for this transaction at tonight's meeting. See you there. Karen Keesee zBoard of Supervisors - Page 1 From: "Dennis" <abrooks6@prodigy.net> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Tue, Mar 27, 2001 11:17 AM Dear Board of Supervisors, My name is Dennis Brooks and I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street in Salem,Virginia in Roanoke County. I am writing this letter in support of the sale/trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. It seems to me that the trade would be beneficial to both Roanoke County and Christian Life Fellowship. A trade would certainly benefit Roanoke County in the years to come with added community property or business tax dollars. I will see you at the meeting Tuesday night. Dennis Brooks ~`zBoard of Supervisors -Christian Life Fellowship Church Page 1J From: <Lisa.Thomas@pyamonarch.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Tue, Mar 27, 2001 7:59 AM Subject: Christian Life Fellowship Church Roanoke County Board of Supervisors: Mr. Bob Johnson, Hollins District Mr Joseoh B. Burch Church, Catawaba District Mr. Joseph P. McNamare, Windsor Hills Mr. H. Odell Minnix, Cave Spring District Dr. Harry C. Nicken, Vinton Distruct Gentlemen, my name is Lisa Thomas, and I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street Salem Virginia which is in Roankoe County. I am writing this letter to show my support of the sale/trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. It appears to me that the trade of the Lloyd property would be a good move for Roanoke County as well as the Church. A trade will certainly benefit the county for years to come in added community property or business tax dollars. I will see you tonight at the meeting. Thank you, Lisa Thomas ~zBoard of Supervisors -Christian Life Fellowship Page 1 From: <Asr167@aol.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Tue, Mar 27, 2001 8:05 AM Subject: Christian Life Fellowship Good morning Gentleman: I am writing in support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. I believe that the trade of the Lloyd property would be a good move for the Roanoke County as well as the Church and its members. Christian Life Fellowship is a stable, solid, positive and growing force in the county and the trade of the Lloyd property would not only benefit the church and its community efforts, but would also benefit the county in added community property and business tax dollars. Thank you for giving this your time and consideration. I plan to attend this evening's meeting to show my support to the family of Christian Life Fellowship. Sincerely, Marie Lavinder Manager Advantage Staffing Resources zBoard of Supervisors -Sale or trade of Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship Page 1 From: "Chris Moore" <cmoore@timbertruss.com> To: "Roanoke County Board of Supervisors" <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Tue, Mar 27, 2001 8:06 AM Subject: Sale or trade of Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship Dear Sirs: My name is Chris Moore and I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street, Salem which is in Roanoke County. I am writing you to express my support for the sale or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. This action will be beneficial to the county for years to come. Sincerely, Chris Moore I will see you at the meeting tonight zBoard of Supervisors -Sale of the Lloyd Property Page 1 From: Pam Pettry <pettry@vt.edu> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Tue, Mar 27, 2001 8:24 AM Subject: Sale of the Lloyd Property Gentlemen, my name is Pam Pettry and I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street, Salem, Virginia, which is in Roanoke County. I am writing this letter in support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. It appears to me that the trade of the Lloyd property would be a good move for Roanoke County as well as the Church. A trade will certainly benefit the county for years to come in added community property or business tax dollars. Thank you for your consideration. Pamela H. Pettry Admin. Assistant to Len Peters Research and Graduate Studies 301 Burruss Hall VPI&SU Blacksburg, VA 24061 (540) 231-6077 -Phone (540) 231-4384 -Fax zBoard of Supervisors -Lloyd Property Page 1 From: "Mary "Sandy" Goodwin/Cooper" <sandycoopr@hotmail.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Tue, Mar 27, 2001 8:30 AM Subject: Lloyd Property I have been attending the services at Christian Life Fellowship on West Main Street in Salem as much as I can in the past few months. I live in the Catawba District in West Roanoke County and hate to see them move, but they need a bigger space. I would like you to consider the sale or trade of their proptery at 4335 West Main Street. I think it would help the county if they would trade the Lloyd proptery, located near the VA Hospital in Salem for the church proptery on West Main in Roanoke County. It would give the County a more valuable site and be located in the County instead of Salem City. The use of the West Main Street proptery would benefit us in West Roanoke County. It would give you an excellant location to resell or locate some facility on that location. The West Main proptery is a great business location. Mary G. Cooper Please note the new a-mail address: sandycoopr@hotmaif.com http://home.att.net/~santee56/ http://www.genealogy.com/users/c/o/o/Mary-G-Cooper http//www.familytreemaker.com/users/co/o/Mary-G-Cooper-VA/ Mary G. "Sandy" Cooper Salem, VA <hr>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at <a href="http://explorer.msn.com">http://explorer.msn.com</a> zBoard of Supervisors - Re:Lloyd property sale Page From: <NHSPRESENCE@cs.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Tue, Mar 27, 2001 8:32 AM Subject: Re:Lloyd property sale To: Mr. Bob Johnson, Hollins District Mr. Joseph B. Butch Church, Catawba District Mr. Joseph P. McNamara, Windsor Hills Mr. H. Odell Minnix, Cave Spring District Dr. Harry C. Nicken, Vinton District Gentlemen, My name is David Linkenhoker, and my family and I are residents of Roanoke County in the Catawba District. I am a regular attending member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street in Salem, which is also in Roanoke County. I wanted to email you and "speak up" about my support about the sale, or possible trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship Church. After hearing the pros and the cons about the sale of the land, it seems to me that the sale/trade of the land would greatly benefit the County, with the added property, or with the added tax dollars. I want to ask you to consider the sale/trade of this land, as I believe it will benefit all who are involved. Thank you so much for reading my letter, and I will see all of you at the Board Meeting tonight. Thanks again! David Linkenhoker & Family zBoard of Supervisors -Christian Life Fellowship and Lloyd propery Page 1 From: <Jerim2911 @aol.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 4:49 PM Subject: Christian Life Fellowship and Lloyd propery To the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors: Mr. Bob Johnson, Hollins District Mr. Joseph B. Butch Church, Catawaba District Mr. H. Odell Minnix, Cave Spring District Mr. Harry C. Nicken, Vinton District Gentlemen, I am writing this letter in support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street Salem Virginia which is located in Roanoke County. I am a member and regular attendee of Christian Life Fellowship and I believe that the trade or sale of the Lloyd property would be advantageous to both the Church and the county. A trade, peculiarly, would benefit the County as it would add community property or business tax dollars in years to come. I look forward to seeing you at the meeting Tuesday night. Sincerely, Michael Lilley _zBoard of Supervisors -Christian Life Fellowship 4335 WMainSt Salem,VA Page 1 From: "theresa francis Willis" <terilou70@hotmail.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 4:49 PM Subject: Christian Life Fellowship 4335 WMainSt Salem,VA zBoard of Supervisors -property for Christian Life Fellowship Page 1 From: <BigDLHurd@aol.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 4:58 PM Subject: property for Christian Life Fellowship To: Members of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors: Mr. Bob Johnson, Mr. Joseph Church, Mr. Joseph McNamara, Mr. H. Minnix, and Dr. Harry Nicken Gentleman, my name is Darryl Hurd, and I belong to Christian Life Fellowship, at 4335 W. Main St. Salem, Va., in Roanoke Co. This letter is in support of the sale or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. I feel that this sale or trade would benefit Roanoke County. If in no other way, it would surly benefit the county in terms of added community property or business taxes. Thank you for your time and I will see you Tuesday night at the meeting. ~~ zBoard of Supervisors - IN FAVOR OF!! Page 1 From: "Bonnie Walston" <bowa0718@msn.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 5:08 PM Subject: IN FAVOR OF!! From Bonnie Walston 154 Maplelawn Avenue N.E. Roanoke, Virginia 24012 To Roanike County Board of Supervisors: Mr. Bob Johnson, Hollins District Mr. Joseph B. Butch Church, Catawaba District Mr. Joseph P. McNamara, Windsor Hills Mr. H. Odell Minnix, Cave Spring District Dr. Harry C. Nicken, Vinton District Gentleman, my name is Bonnie Walston and I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street Salem, Virginia which is in Roanoke County. I am very much in support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. The trade of the Lloyd property would be a good move for Roanoke County as well as the Church and would certainly benefit the county for years to come in added community property or business tax dollars. May the Lord God lead, guide, and direct you in you vote. Thanks for your time, Bonnie Walston <hr>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at <a href="http://explorer.msn.com">http://explorer.msn.com</a> zBoard of Supervisors -Lloyd Property Page 1 From: "Frances Keys" <mawandpop@hotmail.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 5:10 PM Subject: Lloyd Property Gentleman: I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main street, Salem, Virginia which is in Roanoke County. I am writing this letter in support of the sale/trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. I feel this would be a good move for both parties concerned. I will see you Tuesday night at the meeting. Frances Keys Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com zBoard of Supervisors -Lloyd Property Page 1 From: "Frances Keys" <mawandpop@hotmail.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 5:13 PM Subject: Lloyd Property Gentlemen: My name is David Keys and I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street, Salem, VA. I am totally in support of the sale/trade of the Lloyd property. I believe this would be a great benefit for both parties concerned. I will see you Tuesday night at the meeting. Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com rzBoard of Supervisors -Christian Life fellowship Page 1 From: <SVMEADOWS@aol.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 5:42 PM Subject: Christian Life fellowship To Roanoke County Board of Supervisors: Mr. Bob Johnson Mr. Joseph Church Mr. Joseph McNamara , Mr. Odell Minnix Dr. Harry Nicken, Hi, my name is Valerie Meadows and I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street, Salem, VA. I am writing this email in support of the sale or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. I think this would be very beneficial to the church and to Roanoke County. I will see you Tuesday night at the meeting. Sincerely, Valerie Meadows zBoard of Supervisors - Fw: church property Page 1 J From: "ALLEN GARRETT" <xsable@ix.netcom.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 6:13 PM Subject: Fw: church property ----- Original Message ----- From: ALLEN GARRETT To: bos@c.roanoke.va.us Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 6:04 PM Subject: re: church property Dear Sirs, My name is Allen Garrett and I'm a member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 W. Main St Salem, VA which is located in Rke. Co. I am writing this message in support of the sale or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. It sure appears to me that the trade of the Lloyd property would be a good move for Rke. Co. and our church, too. The trade would really generate good tax dollars for the county for many years to come. I will see you at the meeting Tues. night. Sincerely, Allen Garrett zBoard of Supervisors -Lloyd Property Page 1 From: "Roma Simmons" <simmons22693@email.msn.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 7:22 PM Subject: Lloyd Property Gentleman, I, Roma Simmons and writing to support the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. My membership with the church has been for the last six years. I two am a resident of Roanoke County and feel that the trade of the property would be a benefit to both the County and to our church. I will see you Tuesday night at the meeting. Thank you for acknowledging my support. r zBoard of Supervisors -CLF/Land Page 1 From: Randy Rickman <messiah8va@yahoo.com> To: Roanoke board of supervisors <Bos@co.Roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 8:03 PM Subject: CLF/Land Gentlemen, Our name is Randy and Mary Rickman and we are members of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street Salem Virginia which is in Roanoke County. We are also residents of the Cave Spring District. We are writing this letter in support of the sale/trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. It appears to us that the trade of the Lloyd property would be a good move for Roanoke County as well as the church. A trade will certainly benefit the county for years to come in added community property or business tax dollars. We will see you at the meeting Tuesday night. Do You Yahoo!? Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ zBoard of Supervisors -Fwd: Please send this email to help our church Page 1 From: <MackFarene@aol.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 9:08 PM Subject: Fwd: Please send this email to help our church In a message dated 03/26/2001 1:30:11 PM Eastern Standard Time, LockQueen writes: «To Roanoke County Board of Supervisors: Mr. Bob Johnson Mr. Joseph B. Church Mr. Joseph P. McNamara Mr. H. Odell Minnix Dr. Harry C. Nickens Gentleman, My name is Farene H. Bostic and I am amember/ or have been an attendee of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main St. Salem Va. which is in Roanoke County. I am writing this letter in support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. It appears to me that the trade of the Lloyd property would be a good move for Roanoke County as well as the church. A trade will certainly benefit the county for years to come in added community property or business tax dollars. I will see you Tuesday night at the meeting. Thank you » Farene H. Bostic ~ zBoard of Supervisors -Lloyd Property Page 1 From: <Pyneleone@aol.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 9:25 PM Subject: Lloyd Property Gentlemen: My name is Rosella Pyne and I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street, Salem, VA, which is in Roanoke County. I am writing this letter in support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. It appears to me that the trade of the Lloyd property would be a good move for Roanoke County as well as the Church. A trade will certainly benefit the county for years to come in added community property or business tax dollars. I will see you Tuesday, 3/27/01, at the Supervisor's Meeting at 6:30 PM Sincerely, Rosella Pyne zBoard of Supervisors -Lloyd Property Page 1 From: <FROMNYTOVA@aol.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 9:28 PM Subject: Lloyd Property Gentlemen: My name is Lawrence Leone and I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street, Salem, VA, which is in Roanoke County. I am writing this letter in support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. It appears to me that the trade of the Lloyd property would be a good move for Roanoke County as well as the Church. A trade will certainly benefit the county for years to come in added community property or business tax dollars. I will see you Tuesday, 3/27/01, at the Supervisor's Meeting at 6:30 PM. Sincerely, Lawrence Leone r- l zBoard of Supervisors -CHRISTIAN LIFE FELLOWSHIP PURCHASE OF LLOYD PROPERTY Page 1 From: "MATT SARVER" <SNSSWS1970@msn.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 9:39 PM Subject: CHRISTIAN LIFE FELLOWSH-P PURCHASE OF LLOYD PROPERTY TO ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Mr. Bob Johnson, Hollins District Mr. Joseph B. Butch Church, Catawba District Mr. Joseph P. McNamara, Windsor Hills District Mr. H. Odell Minnix, Cave Spring District Dr. Harry C. Nickens, Vinton District Dear Supervisors, My name is Matthew Sarver and I reside at Route 1, Box 554, Catawba Virginia. I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship at West Main Street, Salem Virginia. I understand that on 3/27/01 you will be making a decision on the Lloyd property. I want to let you know that I am in favor of the sale or trade of this property to Christian Life Fellowship. This move would be very good for Roanoke County as well as the church, but especially the communities surrounding the LLoyd property would benefit from having a church such as Christian Life Fellowship nearby. I look forward to seeing you at the meeting on Tuesday night. Respectfully, Matthew Sarver zBoard of Supervisors -Sale /Trade of Lloyd Property to Christian Life Fellowship Page 1 From: <TigerCat70@aol.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 9:41 PM Subject: Sale /Trade of Lloyd Property to Christian Life Fellowship To Roanoke County Board of Supervisors: Mr. Bob Johnson Mr. Joseph B. Church Mr. Joseph P. McNamara Mr. H. Odell Minnix Dr. Harry C. Nickens Gentleman, ** My name is Sandra Flinchum and I am amember / or have been an attendee of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main St." Salem Va. which is in Roanoke County. * I am writing this letter in support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. It appears to me that the trade of the Lloyd property would be a good move for Roanoke County as well as the church. * A trade will certainly benefit the county for years to come in added community property or business tax dollars. I will see you Tuesday night at the meeting. Thank you, Sandra Flinchum zBoard of Supervisors -Trade of Lloyd Property for Christian Life Fellowship Page 1 From: <CFD809@aol.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 9:43 PM Subject: Trade of Lloyd Property for Christian Life Fellowship To Roanoke County Board of Supervisors: Mr. Bob Johnson Mr. Joseph B. Church Mr. Joseph P. McNamara Mr. H. Odell Minnix Dr. Harry C. Nickens Gentleman, "" My name is David Flinchum and I am amember / or have been an attendee of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main St.'` Salem Va. which is in Roanoke County. * I am writing this letter in support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. It appears to me that the trade of the Lloyd property would be a good move for Roanoke County as well as the church. '' A trade will certainly benefit the county for years to come in added community property or business tax dollars. I will see you Tuesday night at the meeting. Thank you, David Flinchum ~~ zBoard of Supervisors -Lloyd Property Page 1 From: "MATT SARVER" <SNSSWS1970@msn.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 9:52 PM Subject: Lloyd Property TO ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Mr. Bob Johnson, Hollins District Mr. Joseph B. Butch Church, Catawba District Mr. Joseph P. Mcnamara, Windsor Hills District Mr. H. Odell Minnis, Cave Spring District Dr. Harry C. Nickens, Vinton District My name is S. Ned Sarver and I attend the Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street. Salem Virginia. I am writing to let you know that I support the sale or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. I cannot think of any other use of this property that would be as beneficial as having a church like Christian Life Fellowship on its premises. I especially feel that a trade would be a good move for Roanoke County as well as the church. Sincerely, S. Ned Sarver <hr>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at <a href="http://explorer.msn.com">http://explorer.msn.com</a> ~ zBoard of Supervisors -SALE/TRADE OF LLOYD PROPERTY Page 1 From: "MATT SARVER" <SNSSWS1970@msn.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 10:15 PM Subject: SALE/TRADE OF LLOYD PROPERTY TO ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Mr. Bob Johnson, Hollins District Mr. Joseph B. Butch Church, Catawba District Mr. Joseph P. McNamara, Windsor Hills District Mr. H. Odell Minnix, Cave Spring District Dr. Harry C. Nickens, Vinton District Gentlemen: My name is Sheldon N. Sarver, Jr. and I live at Route 1 Box 554, Catawba Virginia. I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship and am writing to let you know that I am in favor of the sale/trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship which is located in Roanoke County. It seems to me that if a trade could be worked out it would be beneficial to the county as well as the church. This is one of the finest churches I have ever attended and has been very involved in numerous means of reaching out to needy people. The people who live around the Lloyd property would be the ones to benefit the most. Please, when making your decision, keep my views on this subject in mind. Yours Truly, Sheldon N. Sarver, Jr. <hr>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at <a href="http://explorer.msn.com">http://explorer.msn.com</a> zBoard of Supervisors -Lloyd Property Page 1 From: "Angie Apgar" <ahapgar@mindspring.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 10:17 PM Subject: Lloyd Property This letter is being sent for Larry and Linda Humphrey. Dear Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, We are members of Christian Life Fellowship. As you know, our church is bidding for the Lloyd Property in your jurisdiction. We urge you to consider our need for this property. Many prayers and offerings have gone toward the building of our present facility in the Glenvar area. The goals we had set for that site will no longer be sufficient for the congregation we now have. With the expansion of the roadways surrounding that area, the site itself should prove to be a wonderful commercial location for a business. With this in mind, I urge you to consider our offer. It would be a mistake to dismiss the opportunity to increase your revenue and improve on our present society. So please, as a tax payer and dedicated member of CLF, consider not only our need for relocating, but the community's need for a unified home. God Bless, Larry & Linda Humphrey ~zBoard of Supervisors - (no subject) Page 1 ~ From: <Sk8jpb@cs.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 10:53 PM Subject: (no subject) To Roanoke County Board of Supervisors: Mr. Bob Johnsosn, Hollins District Mr. Joseph B. Butch Church, Catawaba District Mr. Joseph P. McNamara, Windsor Hills Mr. H. Odell Minnix, Cave Spring District Mr. Harry C. Nicken, Vinton District Gentleman, my name is Jordan Ballard and I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street Salem Virginia which is in Roanoke County. I am writing this letter in support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. It appears to me that the trade of the Lloyd property would be a good move for Roanoke County as well as the Church. A trade will certainly benefit the county for years to come in added community property or business tax dollars. I will see you Tuesday night at the meeting. Thank You zBoard of Supervisors -Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Page 1 From: <Jett264@aol.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 11:06 PM Subject: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors . Mr. Bob Johnson, Hollins District Mr. Joseph B. Butch Church, Catawaba District Mr. Joseph P. McNamara, Windsor Hills Mr. H. Odell Minnix, Cave Spring District Dr. Harry C. Nicken, Vinton District Dear Sirs, *'`***`*"Hi, my name is Peggy Snider. I am a church member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street Salem VA which in Roanoke County. *I want to let you know I support the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. *I believe that the trade of the Lloyd property would be good for Roanoke County as well as our Church. '`It would certainly benefit the county for many years to come in added community property or business tax dollars. I will see you Tuesday night at the meeting. -Peggy Snider ~zBoard of Supervisors -The sale or trade of the Lloyd property Page 1 From: "Johnathan Hatcher" <jhatcher0@msn.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 11:22 PM Subject: The sale or trade of the Lloyd property To Roanoke County Board of Supervisers Mr. Bob Johnson Mr. Joseph B. Butch Church Mr. Joseph P. McNamara Mr. H. Odell Minnex Dr. Harry C. Nicken Gentlemen, my name is Johnathan Hatcher and I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship on West Main Street Salem in Roanoke County. I am writing this letter in support of the sale or trade of the Llyod property to Christian Life Fellowship. It appears to me that the trade of the Lloyd property would be beneficial for both parties. A trade would benefit the county for years to come in additional community property or business tax dollars. Thank you for your time and I will see you at the meeting on Tuesday evening. zBoard of Supervisors -Land Page 1 From: Vickie L Craft <vickielynn2@juno.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 11:26 PM Subject: Land Dear Sirs: I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street Salem Virginia. I hereby notify you of my support in the sale or trade of Lloyd property. I believe the trade would be more benefit to the county, as it would add community property or business tax dollars. I will see you Tuesday night. Thank you Have a great day Vickie L. Craft CC: <Vickielynn2@juno.com> zBoard of Supervisors -Lloyd property and Christian Life Fellowship Church Page 1 From: <DEBRALPN4U@aol.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Tue, Mar 27, 2001 6:36 AM Subject: Lloyd property and Christian Life Fellowship Church Dear Mr. Bob Johnson ,Mr. Joseph B. Butch Church,Mr Joseph P. McNamara, Mr. Odell Minnix, Dr, Harry C. Nichen, My name is Debra Barton and I am a member of Christian Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street Salem, Va which is Roanoke County. I am writting to let you know that I am in favor of the sale or the exchange of our land for the Lloyd property. I feel that the will be good for all parties. I would like this venture to be benifical to all and feel that it will. I will see you tonight at the meeting. Sincerly, Debra Barton ~oard of Supervisors -Lloyd Property Page 1 From: "Jim Sanders" <jimsanders4@home.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 3:11 PM Subject: Lloyd Property Mr. bob Johnson, Hollins District Mr. Joseph B. Butch Church, Catawaba District Mr. Joseph P. McNamara, Windsor Hills Mr. H. Odell Minnix, Cave Spring District Dr. Harry C. Nicken, Vinton Dostrict Gentleman, my name is Jim L. Sanders. I live in the Hollins District at 744 Greenwich Dr. and I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street Salem Virginia which is in Roanoke County. I am writing this letter in support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christaian Life Fellowship. It appears to me that the trade of the Lloyd property would be a good move for Roanoke County as well as the Church. A trade will certainly benefit the county for years to come in added community property or business tax dollars. I look forward to seeing you Tuesday night at the meeting. Thank You Jim Sanders zBoard of Supervisors -Lloyd Property Page 1 From: "Jim Sanders" <jimsanders4@home.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 3:13 PM Subject: Lloyd Property Mr. bob Johnson, Hollins District Mr. Joseph B. Butch Church, Catawaba District Mr. Joseph P. McNamara, Windsor Hills Mr. H. Odell Minnix, Cave Spring District Dr. Harry C. Nicken, Vinton Dostrict Gentleman, my name is Ellen Sanders. I live in the Hollins District at 744 Greenwich Dr. and I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street Salem Virginia which is in Roanoke County. I am writing this letter in support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christaian Life Fellowship. It appears to me that the trade of the Lloyd property would be a good move for Roanoke County as well as the Church. A trade will certainly benefit the county for years to come in added community property or business tax dollars. I look forward to seeing you Tuesday night at the meeting. Thank You Ellen Sanders zBoard of Supervisors -Lloyd Property for Christian Life Fellowship Page 1 From: Holly S Parr <hparr@juno.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 3:24 PM Subject: Lloyd Property for Christian Life Fellowship ATTN: DR. HARRY C. NICKEN Sir, my name is Holly Parr. I'm a regular attender of Christian Life Fellowship Chruch at 4335 West Main Street, Salem, VA, which is in Roanoke County. I wanted to write to voice my support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to C.L.F. After reviewing all information, I feel that this trade would be very beneficial not only to the church, but for Roanoke County as well. A trade would certainly benefit the county for years to come in added community property or business tax dollars. I appreciate your sincere consideration of this transaction. I will see you Tuesday night at the meeting. Sincerely, Holly Parr ~ zBoard of Supervisors -Lloyd Property Page 1 From: <GILNCLARA@aol.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 1:37 PM Subject: Lloyd Property To Roanoke County Board of Supervisors: Mr.Bob Johnson,Hollins District Mr.Joseph B. Butch Church, Catawba Distict Mr.Joseph P. McNamara, Windsor Hills Mr.H. Odell Minix, Cave Spring District Dr. Harry C. Nicken, Vinton District Gentlemen, my name is Clara Jane Ortega and I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street Salem Virginia which is in Roanoke County. I also live in the Catawba District of Roanoke County on 1042 Texas Hollow Road in Salem. I am writing this letter in support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. I believe with all my heart that the trade would be a good move for everyone involved and could continue to benefit the county for years to come in added property or tax dollars. I will see you Tuesday Night. Clara Jane Ortega zBoard of Supervisors -Lloyd Property Page 1 From: "Benjamin Linkous" <bcl@whoeng.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 1:49 PM Subject: Lloyd Property Gentlemen, my name is Benjamin Linkous and I am a member at Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street Salem, VA in Roanoke County. I would just like to encourage the trade/sale of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. Not only would this greatly benefit the people of the Roanoke Valley, but also the County of Roanoke. Asa 1996 graduate of Glenvar High School, I was often faced with the situation of not having a sufficient library nearby in which to research. Because of this, I often found myself reverting to the Salem Library for the needed resources. This proposed trade would be much needed by the County in order to stay up to date and competitive. Thank you for time and support. I will see you Tuesday night at the meeting. Benjamin C. Linkous Board of Supervisors - Mr. Johnson, Church, McNamara, Minnix, Nicken Page 1 From: <Hotshot449@cs.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 1:58 PM Subject: Mr. Johnson, Church, McNamara, Minnix, Nicken My name is Jessica Ballard & my family & I go to Christian Life Fellowship. Our church is trying to make arrangements on the Lloyd property & this sounds like a good opportunity for the church & for Roanoke County. I hope that you support this new home for our church. I will be at the meeting on Tuesday night with my parents, so I will see you then. Thank you, Jessica Ballard zBoard of Supervisors - Mr. Hollins Page 1 From: <Hotshot449@cs.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 1:59 PM Subject: Mr. Hollins My name is Jessica Ballard & my family & I go to Christian Life Fellowship. Our church is trying to make arrangements on the Lloyd property & this sounds like a good opportunity for the church & for Roanoke County. I hope that you support this new home for our church. I will be at the meeting on Tuesday night with my parents, so I will see you then. -- zBoard of Supervisors - Mr. McNamara Page 1 From: <Hotshot449@cs.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 1:59 PM Subject: Mr. McNamara My name is Jessica Ballard & my family & I go to Christian Life Fellowship. Our church is trying to make arrangements on the Lloyd property & this sounds like a good opportunity for the church & for Roanoke County. I hope that you support this new home for our church. I will be at the meeting on Tuesday night with my parents, so I will see you then. zBoard of Supervisors - Mr. Church Page 1 From: <Hotshot449@cs.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 2:00 PM Subject: Mr. Church My name is Jessica Ballard & my family & I go to Christian Life Fellowship. Our church is trying to make arrangements on the Lloyd property & this sounds like a good opportunity for the church & for Roanoke County. I hope that you support this new home for our church. I will be at the meeting on Tuesday night with my parents, so I will see you then. zBoard of Supervisors - Mr. Minnix Page 1 j From: <Hotshot449@cs.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 2:00 PM Subject: Mr. Minnix My name is Jessica Ballard & my family & I go to Christian Life Fellowship. Our church is trying to make arrangements on the Lloyd property & this sounds like a good opportunity for the church & for Roanoke County. I hope that you support this new home for our church. I will be at the meeting on Tuesday night with my parents, so I will see you then. zBoard of Supervisors - Mr. Nicken Page 1 From: <Hotshot449@cs.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 2:01 PM Subject: Mr. Nicken My name is Jessica Ballard & my family & I go to Christian Life Fellowship. Our church is trying to make arrangements on the Lloyd property & this sounds like a good opportunity for the church & for Roanoke County. I hope that you support this new home for our church. I will be at the meeting on Tuesday night with my parents, so I will see you then. ` zBoard of Supervisors - Mr. Hollins Page 1 From: <Hotshot449@cs.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 2:01 PM Subject: Mr. Hollins My name is Jessica Ballard & my family & I go to Christian Life Fellowship. Our church is trying to make arrangements on the Lloyd property & this sounds like a good opportunity for the church & for Roanoke County. I hope that you support this new home for our church. I will be at the meeting on Tuesday night with my parents, so I will see you then. zBoard of Supervisors -Christian Life Fellowship/Lloyd Property Page 1 From: <Gregsmas@aol.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 2:02 PM Subject: Christian Life Fellowship/Lloyd Property Good afternoon Gentlemen: I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship in Salem, VA, located in Roanoke County. My reason for writing this letter is to express my support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. I believe the sale or trade of this property would be a good move for Roanoke County as well as for Christian Life Fellowship. It would certainly benefit the county for years to come in added community property or business tax dollars. I hope to see you at the meeting Tuesday night. Thank you for your consideration. Bonnie Weiser r- ~zBoard of Supervisors -Sale or Trade of Lloyd Property to Christian Life Fellowship Page 1 From: Wanza Blevins <wanzas.treasures@verizon.net> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 2:03 PM Subject: Sale or Trade of Lloyd Property to Christian Life Fellowship To The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, I Robert G. Blevins am in support of the sale or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. It appears to me that the trade of the Lloyd property would be a good move for Roanoke County as well as the church. This will benefit the county for years to come in added community property and business tax dollars. Sincerely, Robert G. Blevins zBoard of Supervisors -Propertysale and/or trade Page 1 From: "P.K. Gerrol" <pgerrol@salem.k12.va.us> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 2:05 PM Subject: Propertysale and/or trade Board of Supervisors: My name is Paula Gerrol-a member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street Salem VA which is in Rke Co. I am in support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. This trade would be not only a good trade for the church-but also for Roanoke County. The county would benefit in added community property or business tax dollars. I will see you Tuesday night at the meeting. zBoard of Supervisors -Sale of the Lloyd property Page 1 From: Wanza Blevins <wanzas.treasures@verizon.net> To: <To@verizon.net>, <The@verizon.net>, <Board@verizon.net>, <of@verizon.net>, <Supervisors@verizon.net>, <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 2:08 PM Subject: Sale of the Lloyd property To The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, I Wanza K. Blevins am in support of the sale or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. It appears to me that the trade of the Lloyd property would be a good move for Roanoke County as well as the church. This will benefit the county for years to come in added community property and business tax dollars. Sincerely, Wanza K. Blevins zBoard of Supervisors -Sale of the Lloyd property Page 1 From: Wanza Blevins <wanzas.treasures@verizon.net> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 2:15 PM Subject: Sale of the Lloyd property To the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, I am in support of the sale or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. It appears to me that the trade of the Lloyd property would be a good move for Roanoke County as well as the church. This will benefit the county for years to come in added community property and business tax dollars. zBoard of Supervisors -Sale or Trade of Lioyd Property Page 1 From: <ron.akers@att.net> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 11:23 AM Subject: Sale or Trade of Lioyd Property Gentlemen: My name is Ron Akers and I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street, which is in west Roanoke County. For some time now, our church officials have been negotiating with you concerning the sale or possible trade for the Lloyd property located in the city of Salem. Please vote in favor of this at your Tuesday meeting. The trade seems to me as though it would benefit both parties, as it would give you additional property in the county and would give our church room to grow. It also appears to me that our current property would give Roanoke County an added bargaining possition with the coming widening of I-81 and Route 11 in that area. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Yours truly, Ronald L. Akers ~zBoard of Supervisors -Church Land for Christian Life Page 1 L----- - From: Norris Elliott <nelliott@jacuzzi.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 11:28 AM Subject: Church Land for Christian Life To Roanoke County Board of Supervisors: Mr. Bob Johnson Mr. Joseph B. Church Mr. Joseph P. McNamara Mr. H. Odell Minnix Dr. Harry C. Nickens Gentleman, My name is _Norris Elliott and I am amember/ or have been an attendee of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main St. Salem Va. which is in Roanoke County. I am writing this letter in support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. It appears to me that the trade of the Lloyd property would be a good move for Roanoke County as well as the church. A trade will certainly benefit the county for years to come in added community property or business tax dollars. I will see you Tuesday night at the meeting. Thank you zBoard of Supervisors -Attn: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Page 1 From: Maggie Shoemaker <covenant_keeper@juno.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 11:41 AM Subject: Attn: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors To Roanoke County Board of Supervisors: Mr. Bob Johnson Mr. Joseph B. Butch Church Mr. Joseph P. McNamara Mr. H. Odell Minnix Dr. Harry C. Nicken Gentlemen, my name is Maggie Shoemaker and I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main St Salem Virginia which is in Roanoke County. I also reside in Roanoke County. I am writing this letter in total support of the sale/trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. The trade of the property would be an excellent move for the county as well as the Church. I also believe that the trade will be beneficial to the county in added community property and/or business tax dollars. Sincerely, Maggie Shoemaker GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. ~zBoard of Supervisors -Lloyd property _ Page 1 From: Juanita Walker <WEBB3@webtv.net> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 11:59 AM Subject: Lloyd property Mr. Bob Johnson Mr. Joseph B. Butch Church Mr. Joseph P. McNamara Mr. H. Odell Minnix Dr. Harry C. Nicken Gentlemen, My name is Norma K. Walker and I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship on West Main St. in Salem Va.. I am a regular attendee there. I am writing in support of the sale and / or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. The trade of this property looks to be a good move for for Roanoke County as well as the church, Added community property and/ or business dollars would certainly be a benefit to the county in the years to come. I will see you at the meeting Tuesday night. Board of Supervisors -Attention Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Page 1 From: <PrzeHym@cs.com> To: <Bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 12:20 PM Subject: Attention Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Mr. Bob Johnson Mr. Butch Church Mr. Joseph McNamara Mr. Odell Minnix Dr. Harry Nicken Gentlemen, my name is Eva Crizer and I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship Church in Salem. I am asking you to please support the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. It appears to me that the trade of the Lloyd property would be a good move for Roanoke County as well as the church. This trade would certainly benefit the County for years to come in added community property or business tax dollars. I will see you Tuesday night at the meeting. Thank you. Eva Crizer zBoard of Supervisors -sale of Iloyd property Page 1 From: <Yoko81 @gateway.net> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 12:24 PM Subject: sale of Iloyd property gentlemen,our names are david and rena riddleberger, we are members of Christian life fellowship located at 4335 w. main st. salem va. we are mailing you in support of the sale /trade of the Iloyd property to our church. i am assured this transaction will be a good move for both parties and a blessing to the entire community.not only will revenues for the county be increased, but the lives of many families will be enriched .thank you, david &rena riddleberger zBoard of Supervisors -Attention Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Page 1 ~ From: <UserGwcrz2313@cs.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 12:29 PM Subject: Attention Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Mr. Bob Johnson Mr. Joseph Butch Church Mr. Joseph McNamara Mr. Odell Minnix Dr. Harry Nicken Gentlemen, my name is Gary Crizer and I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship Church in Salem. I am asking you to please support the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship Church. I believe that the trade of the Lloyd property would benefit both parties. This trade would certainly benefit the county for years to come in added community property or business tax dollars. Thank you very much for your support. My family will see you Tuesday night at the meeting as I am currently out of town. Gary Crizer j~zBoard of Supervisors -Sale or trade of the Lloydproperty Page 1 From: Frank Walker <fwalker2swvanet@webtv.net> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 12:45 PM Subject: Sale or trade of the Lloydproperty To Roanoke County Board of Supervisors : Mr. Bob Johnson Mr Joseph B. Butch Church Mr. Joseph P. McNamara Nr. H. Odell Minnix Dr. Harry C. Nicken Gentlemen, My name is Frank W. Walker and I am a member and regular attender of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main St. in Salem VA. which is in Roanoke County. I am writing in support of the sale or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Lile Fellowship. It appears to be a good move for the church as well as for Roanoke County. The county would surely beneft the added community property or the added business dollars for years to come. I will be at the meeting on Tuesday night. Frank W. Walker Rt 1 Box 536 Catawba VA 24070 ~-- ii zBoard of Supervisors - (no subject) Page 1 From: <LindaBird0616@aol.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 12:46 PM Subject: (no subject) GENTLEMEN ,MY NAME IS WILLIAM C. WEBSTER AND I AM A MEMBER OF CHRISTAIN LIFE FELLOWSHIP AT 4335 WEST MAIN ST SALEM VA WHICH IS IN ROANOKE COUNTY. I AM WRITING THIS LETTER IN SUPPORT OF THE SALE /TRADE OF THE LIOYD PROPERTY TO CHRISTAIN LIFE FELLOWSHIP. IT APPEARS TO ME THAT TRADE OF THE LIOYD PROPERTY WOULD BE A GOOD MOVE FOR ROANOKE COUNTY AS WELL AS THE CHURCH.A TRADE WILL CERTAINLY BENEFIT THE COUNTY FOR YEARS TO COME IN ADDED COMMUNITY PROPERTY OR BUSINESS TAX DOLLARS. WILLIAM C. WEBSTER I WILL SEE YOU TUESDAY NIGHT AT THE MEETING zBoard of Supervisors -Lloyd Property Page 1 From: "Timothy A Wayne" <timandmel2@cfaith.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 1:00 PM Subject: Lloyd Property To: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors: Mr. Bob Johnson Mr. Joseph B. Butch Church Mr. Joseph P. McNamara Mr. H. Odell Minnix Dr. Harry C. Nicken Good afternoon, Gentlemen. My name is Melanie Wayne. I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship, located at 4335 W. Main St. Salem, Va.-which is in Roanoke County. tam writing this message to you to let you know that I am in full support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. I feel confident that the trade of the Lloyd property would be a wonderful move for Roanoke County as well as Christian Life Fellowship. I believe that a trade would certainly benefit the county for now and in the future. I look forward to seeing you on Tuesday evening at the meeting. Sincerely-In His Joy, Melanie A. Wayne ~zBoard of Supervisors -Land for Christian Life Fellowship Page 1 From: <LockQueen@aol.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 1:18 PM Subject: Land for Christian Life Fellowship « To Roanoke County Board of Supervisors: Mr. Bob Johnson Mr. Joseph B. Church Mr. Joseph P. McNamara Mr. H. Odell Minnix Dr. Harry C. Nickens Gentleman, My name is Jo Sowers and I am amember/ or have been an attendee of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main St. Salem Va. which is in Roanoke County. I am writing this letter in support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. It appears to me that the trade of the Lloyd property would be a good move for Roanoke County as well as the church. A trade will certainly benefit the county for years to come in added community property or business tax dollars. I will see you Tuesday night at the meeting. Thank you zBoard of Supervisors -church property Page 1 From: "Lisa A. Thomas" <Ithomas@swva.net> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 1:19 PM Subject: church property Roanoke County Board of Supervisors: Mr. Bob Johnson, Hollins District Mr. Joseph B. Butch Church, Catawaba District Mr. Joseph P McNamara, Windsor Hills Mr. H. Odell Minnix, Cave Spring District Dr. Harry C. Nicken, Vinton District Dear Sirs, My name is Lisa Thomas and I am a resident of Roanoke County. I am writing concerning the Lloyd Property. I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street in Salem, VA, which is Roanoke Co. I support the trade and/or sale of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. It seems to me that either action would benefit both the Church as well as Roanoke County. And most certainly a trade would benifit the county for many years with added business tax dollars. Thank you for your time to listen to my opinion. God Bless, and I will see you Tuesday night at the meeting!! Thank you, Lisa Thomas `, zBoard of Supervisors -church property Page 1 From: "Lisa A. Thomas" <Ithomas@swva.net> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 1:20 PM Subject: church property Roanoke County Board of Supervisors: Mr. Bob Johnson, Hollins District Mr. Joseph B. Butch Church, Catawaba District Mr. Joseph P McNamara, Windsor Hills Mr. H. Odell Minnix, Cave Spring District Dr. Harry C. Nicken, Vinton District Dear Sirs, My name is Mark Thomas and I am a resident of Roanoke County. I am writing concerning the Lloyd Property. I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street in Salem, VA, which is Roanoke Co. I support the trade and/or sale of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. It seems to me that either action would benefit both the Church as well as Roanoke County. And most certainly a trade would benifit the county for many years with added business tax dollars. Thank you for your time to listen to my opinion. God Bless, and I will see you Tuesday night at the meeting!! Thank you, Mark Thomas zBoard of Supervisors -Lloyd Property... Page 1 From: "Timothy A Wayne" <timandmel2@cfaith.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 1:23 PM Subject: Lloyd Property... To: Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Mr. Bob Johnson Mr. Joseph B. Butch Church Mr. Joseph P. McNamara Mr. H. Odell Minnix Dr. Harry C. Nicken Gentlemen, my name is Timothy Wayne and I am member of Christian Life Fellowship located at 4335 W. Main St. Salem, VA-which is located in Roanoke County. I am writing to inform you that I am in full support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property with Christian Life Fellowship. In my opinion, the trade of the Lloyd property would be a very beneficial move for the County as well as CLF, as opposed to a simple sale. The trade would most certainly benefit the county for years to come in community property or business tax dollars. Thank you for your time and I will see you Tuesday evening at the meeting. Sincerely, Timothy A. Wayne zBoard of Supervisors -SALE OF PROPERTY Page 1 From: <Fastcarr1 @aol.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 9:40 AM Subject: SALE OF PROPERTY To Roanoke County Board of Supervisors: Mr. Bob Johnson Mr. Joseph B. Butch Church Mr. Joseph McNamara Mr. H. Odell Minnix Dr. Harry C Nicken Gentlemen, my name is Frances Carr and I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street, Salem, VA which is in Roanoke County. I am writing this note in support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. I feel that the trade of the Lloyd property would be an excellent move for Roanoke County as well as our Church. A trade will certainly benefit the county for years to come in added community property or business tax dollars. Thanks so much for your time, and I will see you Tuesday night at the meeting regarding the property. Frances Carr zBoard of Supervisors -Lloyd property Page 1 From: "rev.net email" <avab@rev.net> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 9:44 AM Subject: Lloyd property Dear Sirs; Our name is Harry and Ava Brown and we are members of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street Salem Virginia which is in Roanoke County. I am writing this letter in support of the trade or sale of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship.We feel this transaction would be beneficial to Roanoke County as well as the Church in added taxes as well as added community property. We will see you Tuesday night at the meeting. zBoard of Supervisors -Lloyd property sale to Christian Life Fellowship Page 1 From: "Chris Moore" <moorefamily@cleanweb.net> To: "Roanoke County Board of Supervisors" <bos@ co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 9:57 AM Subject: Lloyd property sale to Christian Life Fellowship To Roanoke County Board of Supervisors: Mr. Bob Johnson, Hollins District Mr. Joseph B. "Butch" Church, Catawba District Mr. Joseph P. McNamara, Windsor Hills Mr. H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix, Cave Spring District Mr. Harry C. Nicken, Vinton District Dear Sirs: My name is Barbara Moore and I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street in Salem, VA. I want to express my support for the sale or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. I believe that it would be a good move for the county as well as the church. I hope we can count on your support at Tuesday night's meeting. Barbara Moore '~ zBoard of Supervisors -Lloyd Property Page 1 From: "Akers, Jay" <JAkers@mwwindows.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 10:03 AM Subject: Lloyd Property Attn: Mr. Bob Johnson, Hollins District Mr. Joseph Butch Church, Catawba District Mr. Joseph P. McNamara, Windsor Hills Mr. H. Odell Minnix, Cave Spring District * Dr. Harry C. Nickens, Vinton District From: John Akers, C.P.M. 1001 East Cleveland Ave " VINTON VA 24179 Gentleman, Me and my family are regular attendee's of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street Salem, Virginia, located in Roanoke County. I am writing this letter in hope for ALL of you to support the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to this wonderful church. I will not go into the impact this church has had on my family, especially my teenage children. And as their parent, seeing them grow in ways only a parent could wish for. Now as a business man myself, It's appears to me Roanoke County has a great opportunity to gain in benefits for the citizens of Roanoke County for many years with the added community property. Then there is also all the business tax revenue that will be generated from this for years, which the county will need as it growth continues. Thank you, I look forward to seeing you all Tuesday night at the meeting. John Akers, C.P.M. Board of Supervisors -Lloyd Property for Christian Life Fellowship Page 1 From: Holly S Parr <hparr@juno.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 10:09 AM Subject: Lloyd Property for Christian Life Fellowship ATTN: Mr. Bob Johnson Sir, my name is Holly Parr. I'm a regular attender of Christian Life Fellowship Church at 4335 West Main Street, Salem, VA, which is in Roanoke County. I wanted to write to voice my support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to C.L.F. After reviewing all information, I feel that this trade would be very beneficial not only to the church, but for Roanoke County as well. A trade would certainly benefit the county for years to come in added community property or business tax dollars. I appreciate your sincere consideration of this transaction. I will see you Tuesday night at the meeting. Sincerely, Holly Parr ~ zBoard of Supervisors -Sale of Lloyd Property Page 1 From: <DTRay92544@aol.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 10:10 AM Subject: Sale of Lloyd Property To Roanoke County Board of Supervisors: Mr. Bob Johnson, Hollins District Mr. Joseph B. (Butch) Church, Catawba District Mr. Joseph P. McNamara, Windsor Hills District Mr. H. Odell Minnix, Cave Spring District Dr. Harry C. Nicken, Vinton District Gentlemen, My name is David T. Ray and I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street, Salem Virginia, which is in Roanoke County. I am writing this letter in support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. It appears to me that the trade of the Lloyd property would be a good move for Roanoke County, as well as the Church. A trade will certainly benefit the county for years to come in added community property or business tax dollars. I will see you Tuesday night at the meeting. Respectfully, David T. Ray 5869 Buckland Mill Road Roanoke, Virginia 24019 563-5358 zBoard of Supervisors -Tuesday Night Board Meeting Page 1 From: "Regina Martin" <rmmartin@carilion.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 10:11 AM Subject: Tuesday Night Board Meeting Gentlemen, My name is Regina Martin and I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street Salem Virginia, as well as a resident of Roanoke County. I am e-mailing you in support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. Looking at what is best for both the Church and Roanoke County, it seems to me that the trade of the Lloyd property makes the most sense as both will benefit (in different ways of course) for many years to come. I ask that you please consider giving your support to this purchase/trade on Tuesday night. Either my husband or I one will see you Tuesday at the meeting. Have a blessed and wonderful day!! Regina ~ZBOard of Supervisors -Sale of Lloyd Property From: "Dave Ray" <dtray777@home.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 10:12 AM Subject: Sale of Lloyd Property To Roanoke County Board of Supervisors: Mr. Bob Johnson, Hollins District Mr. Joseph B. (Butch) Church, Catawba District Mr. Joseph P. McNamara, Windsor Hills District Mr. H. Odell Minnix, Cave Spring District Dr. Harry C. Nicken, Vinton District Gentlemen, My name is Dave T. Ray and I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street, Salem Virginia, which is in Roanoke County. I am writing this letter in support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. It appears to me that the trade of the Lloyd property would be a good move for Roanoke County, as well as the Church. A trade will certainly benefit the county for years to come in added community property or business tax dollars. I will see you Tuesday night at the meeting. Respectfully, Dave T. Ray 5869 Buckland Mill Road Roanoke, Virginia 24019 563-5358 Page 1 zBoard of Supervisors -Lloyd Property From: "Kat Ray" <rn2mcyseat@home.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 10:13 AM Subject: Lloyd Property To Roanoke County Board of Supervisors: Mr. Bob Johnson, Hollins District Mr. Joseph B. (Butch) Church, Catawba District Mr. Joseph P. McNamara, Windsor Hills District Mr. H. Odell Minnix, Cave Spring District Dr. Harry C. Nicken, Vinton District Gentlemen, My name is Kathryne H. Ray and I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street, Salem Virginia, which is in Roanoke County. I am writing this letter in support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. It appears to me that the trade of the Lloyd property would be a good move for Roanoke County, as well as the Church. A trade will certainly benefit the county for years to come in added community property or business tax dollars. I will see you Tuesday night at the meeting. Respectfully, Kathryne H. Ray 5869 Buckland Mill Road Roanoke, Virginia 24019 563-5358 Page 1 zBoard of Supervisors -land purchase Page 1 From: "EDWARD W. OLIVER" <eoliver@res.k12.va.us> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 10:25 AM Subject: land purchase To Roanoke County Board of Supervisors: Mr. Bob Johnson, Hollins District Mr. Joseph B. Butch Church, Catawba District Mr. Joseph P. McNamara, Windsor Hills Mr. H. Odell Minnex, Cave Spring District Dr. Harry C. Nicken, Vinton District Gentlemen, my name is Edward Oliver and I am a regular attendee of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main St. Salem Virginia which is in Roanoke Co. I also live in the Cave Spring District. I am writing this in support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. I think the trade of the Lloyd property would be beneficial for us as a church as well as Roanoke County. It would provide the county with added property and/or business tax dollars. I will see you Tuesday night at the meeting. Edward W. Oliver CC: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> ~ zBoard of Supervisors -Lloyd Property for Christian Life Fellowship Page 1 From: Holly S Parr <hparr@juno.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 10:28 AM Subject: Lloyd Property for Christian Life Fellowship ATTN: MR. JOSEPH MCNAMARA Sir, my name is Holly Parr. I'm a regular attender of Christian Life Fellowship Church at 4335 West Main St., Salem, VA, which is in Roanoke County. I wanted to write to voice my support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to C.L.F. After reviewing all information, I feel that this trade would be very beneficial not only to the church, but for Roanoke County as well. A trade would certainly benefit the country for years o come in added community property or business tax dollars. I appreciate your sincere consideration of this transaction. I will see you Tuesday night. Sincerely, Holly S. Parr zBoard of Supervisors -Lloyd Property for Christian Life Fellowship Page 1 ~ From: Holly S Parr <hparr@juno.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 10:38 AM Subject: Lloyd Property for Christian Life Fellowship ATTN: MR. H. ODELL MINNIX Sir, my name is Holly Parr. I'm a regular attender of Christian Life Fellowship Church at 4335 West Main St., Salem, VA, which is in Roanoke County. I wanted to write to voice my support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd Property to C.L.F. After reviewing all information, I feel that this trade would be very beneficial not only to the church, but for Roanoke County as well. A trade would certainly benefit the county for years to come in added community property or business tax dollars. I appreciate your sincere consideration of this transaction. I will see you Tuesday night at the meeting. Sincerely, Holly Parr zBoard of Supervisors -Lloyd Property Page 1 From: <NancyG7@aol.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 10:49 AM Subject: Lloyd Property TO: Mr. Bob Jonson, Hollins District Mr. Joseph B. Butch Church, Catawaba District Mr. Joseph P. McNamara, Windsor Hills Mr. H. Odell Minnix, Cave Spring District Dr. Harry C. Nicken, Vinton District Gentleman, My name is Nancy Daniel and I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street in Salem, Virginia which is in Roanoke County. I am writing this letter to support the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. It appears to me that the trade of the Lloyd property would be a good move for the Roanoke County as well as the church. A trade will certainly benefit the county for years to come in added community property or business tax dollars. I will see you Tuesday night at the meeting. Sincerely, Nancy G. Daniel ~ zBoard of Supervisors -Support for sale/trade of land. Page 1 From: <Donnaatpeace@aol.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 10:50 AM Subject: Support for sale/trade of land. Dear Roanoke County Board of Supervisors: My name is Donna Garret, and I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship Church, at 4335 West Main Street, Salem, VA, which of course, is in Roanoke County. I am writing this to show I support the sale -- or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. Looks like it would be a win-win situation for both -- very advantageous to us as we are bursting out of our seams -- and for you all for the lifetime investment of tax benefits. See you Tuesday night at the meeting. Sincerely, Donna Garrett To Roanoke County Board of Supervisors: Mr. Bob Johnson, Hollins District Mr. Joseph B. Butch Church, Catawba District Mr. Joseph P. McNamara, Windsor Hills Mr. H. Odell Minnix, Cave Springs District Dr. Harry C. Nicken, Vinton District Sirs, I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship Church located on West Main St., which is in Roanoke County. I am writing you to ask for your support in the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. I personally see the trade as a "win-win" situation. This gives the county a building which could be used to expand the library, be used as a recreation center, administrative offices, you name it. Should the county decide later that the building was not as useful, the building could be sold to industry, providing additional tax revenue for the county. I look forward to seeing you Tuesday night. Sincerely, Colleen A. Haas zBoard of Supervisors -Lloyd property Page 1 From: <Dixonop163@aol.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 7:40 AM Subject: Lloyd property Gentlemen, I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship, W. Main St. Salem, Va. I teach boys in a program called Royal Rangers our purpose is to reach boys for Christ and then teach them to be responsible adults. We are in need of more classroom space. The Lloyd property would provide us with classrooms and also space for outside activities. Our staff and the boys have a Big Thank You awaiting your vote to a trade of our property for yours. Steve Dixon zBoard of Supervisors -Christian Life Fellowship land trade Page 1 From: tmnorth <tmnorth@rbnet.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 7:45 AM Subject: Christian Life Fellowship land trade Gentlemen, On behalf of my wife and me, Terry and Marie Northington, we express our great interest in the land trade transaction currently before you. We are active members of Christian Life Fellowship in Salem and believe the Lloyd property would very much enhance the outreach ministry of our church to the Roanoke Valley. The trade would also allow Roanoke County to derive income from the West Main Street location of the current church facility. We will see you at the meeting Tuesday night. zBoard of Supervisors -Lloyd property Page 1 From: "Brian Widener" <quantumflux8@hotmail.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 7:51 AM Subject: Lloyd property Co.Board of Supervisors: Mr. Bob Johnson,Mr. Joseph B. Butch Church, Mr. Joseph McNamara, Mr. Odell Minnix, Dr. Harry C. Nicken. Dear Sirs, My name is Dr. Brian Widener and I attend Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main St. Salem VA. in Roanoke County. I am writing this letter to express my support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to this church. I personally feel that this trade for the Lloyd property would include some benefits for Roanoke Co. as either comunity property for administration or the property tax benefits not available at the Lloyd property in the City of Salem. I thank you for the consideration. I will see you Tuesday at the meeting. Brian Widener Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com ~ zBoard of Supervisors -Sale of Lloyd Property Page 1 From: <Rn2mcyseat@aol.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 8:29 AM Subject: Sale of Lloyd Property To Roanoke County Board of Supervisors: Mr. Bob Johnson, Hollins District Mr. Joseph B. (Butch) Church, Catawba District Mr. Joseph P. McNamara, Windsor Hills District Mr. H. Odell Minnix, Cave Spring District Dr. Harry C. Nicken, Vinton District Gentlemen, My name is Kathryne H. Ray and I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street, Salem Virginia, which is in Roanoke County. I am writing this letter in support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. It appears to me that the trade of the Lloyd property would be a good move for Roanoke County, as well as the Church. A trade will certainly benefit the county for years to come in added community property or business tax dollars. I will see you Tuesday night at the meeting. Respectfully, Kathryne H. Ray 5869 Buckland Mill Road Roanoke, Virginia 24019 563-5358 zBoard of Supervisors - Mr. Nicken Page 1 From: <R4PAR4SURE@cs.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 9:14 AM Subject: Mr. Nicken My name is Rod Ballard & I am a regular member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street, Salem, VA, which is in Roanoke County. I support the proposed land sale of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship & will be keenly watching the progress of this venture, which would benefit both the county of Roanoke (business tax dollars) & our church (improved facilities & room for expansion. It is a win-win. I ask your continued support, & I look forward to meeting you at the meeting Tuesday evening. zBoard of Supervisors -Lloyd Property Page 1 From: Bill Gerrol <bgerrol@salem.k12.va.us> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 9:15 AM Subject: Lloyd Property I am writing concerning the purchase of the Lloyd property by Christian Life Fellowship Church. The Church is located at 4335 West Main St. in Salem. I am a member of this church. I strongly support the sale/trade of this property. I believe that both parties will benefit. A trade would benefit Roanoke County for years to come by adding taxable property to the county. I will see you Tuesday night at the meeting. zBoard of Supervisors - Mr. Bob Johnson- Sale/ Trade of Lloyd property to CLF Page 1 From: <LLawr24530@aol.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 9:23 AM Subject: Mr. Bob Johnson- Sale/ Trade of Lloyd property to CLF Mr. Johnson: My name is Lorna Martin and I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West main Street in Salem who lives in the Hollins area. I am writting this letter in support of the sale and/or trade of the Llyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. It appears to me that this would benifit both the church and ultimately the Roanoke Valley for years to come in added community property or business tax dollars. Thank you and I will see you Tuesday night at the meeting. Signed, Lorna Martin zBoard of Supervisors -Lloyd property Page 1 From: "Garland Hare" <gfhare@hotmail.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Sun, Mar 25, 2001 6:36 PM Subject: Lloyd property zBoard of Supervisors - To Roanoke County Board of supervisors Page 1 From: <Twee7ty@aol.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Sun, Mar 25, 2001 6:49 PM Subject: To Roanoke County Board of supervisors Gentlemen, my name is Leslie Thompson and I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street Salem Virginia which in Roanoke County am writing this letter in support of the sale or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. I think that the trade of the Lloyd property would be a good move for Roanoke County as well as the Church. A trade will certainly benefit the county in added community property or business tax dollars for years to come. I will see you Tuesday night at the meeting. zBoard of Supervisors - To the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors From: <Tuffnutt4x4@aol.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Sun, Mar 25, 2001 7:51 PM Subject: To the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Dear Sirs, My name is Vicki Baxter, I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 W. Main St. Salem, Va. which is in Roanoke County. I am writing this letter in support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. I also reside in Roanoke County and believe this transaction to be benefical for both parties involved. A trade will certainly benefit our county in the years to come. I will see you tuesday night at the meeting. Sincerely, Page 1 Vicki Baxter ' zBoard of Supervisors - (no subject) Page 1 From: <Oharablankenship@cs.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Sun, Mar 25, 2001 8:03 PM Subject: (no subject) March 25, 2001 Roanoke County Administration Building 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Gentleman, My name is Miss Marty Blankenship and I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street Salem VA which is in Roanoke County and I live in the Catawba District. I am writing this letter in support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. It appears to me that the trade of the Lloyd property would be a good move for Roanoke County as well as the Church. A trade will certainly benefit the county for years to come in added community property or business tax dollars. I will see you Tuesday night at the Board of Supervisors meeting. Sincerely yours, Miss Marty Blankenship ~ zBoard of Supervisors - (no subject) Page 1 From: <Oharablankenship@cs.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Sun, Mar 25, 2001 8:05 PM Subject: (no subject) March 25, 2001 Roanoke County Administration Building 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Gentleman, My name is Ms Irma Blankenship and I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street Salem VA which is in Roanoke County. I have lived in the Catawba District for many years. I am writing this letter in support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. It appears to me that the trade of the Lloyd property would be a good move for Roanoke County as well as the Church. A trade would certainly benefit the county for many years to come in added community property or business tax dollars. I will see you Tuesday night at the meeting. Kind Regards, Ms Irma Blankenship zBoard of Supervisors -Lloyd property Page 1 From: <Mananmorg@aol.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Sun, Mar 25, 2001 8:29 PM Subject: Lloyd property To Roanoke County Board of Supervisors: Mr. Bob Johnson, Hollins District Mr.Joseph B. Butch Church,Catawaba District Mr. Joseph P. McNamara, Windsor City Mr. H. Odell Minnix,Cave Spring District Dr. Harry C. Nicken,Vinton District Gentleman, my name is Donna Hurd and I am regular attendee of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street Salem Virginia which is in Roanoke County.) am in support of the sale/trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. A trade would certainly benefit both parties..) will see you Tuesday night at the meeting. Thank You Donna Hurd ~zBoard of Supervisors -Sale of Property Page 1 From: Parker z graham <pg4christ1 @juno.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Sun, Mar 25, 2001 8:58 PM Subject: Sale of Property Gentlemen, my name is Rob Graham and I attend Christian Life Fellowship, which is in Roanoke County. I wish to encourage you to vote in favor of the purchase of the Loyd Property, by my church. I know as a member of this church, what an asset we could become to the communities of Roanoke, Salem, and Roanoke County, by being located in this area. May God bless, William R. Graham 1617 Mason St. Salem Va. 24153 rzBoard of Supervisors -Sale of Lloyd Property Page 1 From: "MATT SARVER" <SNSSWS1970@msn.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Sun, Mar 25, 2001 9:09 PM Subject: Sale of Lloyd Property MR BOB JOHNSON, HOLLINS DISTRICT MR JOSEPH B BUTCH CHURCH, CATAWBA DISTRICT MR JOSEPH P MCNAMARA, WINDSOR HILLS MR H ODELL MINNIX, CAVE SPRING DISTRICT DR HARRY C NICKEN, VINTON DISTRICT GREETING, GENTLEMEN! My name is Susan W Sarver and I am a resident of Catawba Va. I attend Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street, Salem Virginia, which is in Roanoke County. The purpose of this letter is to let you know that I support the sale of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. If this could be worked out as a property trade then I believe that would be advantageous for Roanoke County as well our church. Also I feel it would be most beneficial for the people living in both communities. I will be at the meeting on Tuesday night and look forward to hearing your decisions on this very important matter. Thank You! Sincerely, Susan W Sarver <hr>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at <a href="http://explorer.msn.com">http://explorer.msn.com</a> i zBoard of Supervisors -Sale of Property Page 1 From: <Srs01674@cs.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Sun, Mar 25, 2001 9:43 PM Subject: Sale of Property TO: ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ATTN: Mr. Bob Johnson, Hollins District Mr. Joseph B. Butch Church, Catawba District Mr. Joseph P. McNamara, Windsor Hills District Mr. H. Odell Minnix, Cave Spring District Dr. Harry C. Nicken, Vinton District Gentlemen, My name is Ann Easter and I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship located in Roanoke County at 4335 West Main Street, Salem, Virginia. I am sending this email showing my support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. The trade of the Lloyd property appears to be a good move for both Roanoke County and the Church. A trade will benefit the county for years to come in added community property or business tax dollars. I will see you Tuesday night at the meeting. zBoard of Supervisors -Sale And/Or Trade of Property Page 1 ~ From: <Srs01674@cs.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Sun, Mar 25, 2001 9:50 PM Subject: Sale And/Or Trade of Property TO: ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ATTN: Mr. Bob Johnson, Hollins District Mr. Joseph B. Butch Church, Catawba District Mr. Joseph P. McNamara, Windsor Hills District Mr. H. Odell Minnix, Cave Spring District Mr. Harry C. Nicken, Vinton District Gentlemen, My name is Carl Easter and I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship located at 4335 West Main Street, Salem, Virginia, which is in Roanoke County. This email is to show my support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. It appears the trade of the Lloyd property would be a good move for both Roanoke County and the Church. A trade will certainly benefit the County for years to come in added community property or business tax dollars. I will see you Tuesday night at the meeting. I zBoard of Supervisors -Sale of Lloyd Property Page 1 From: LARRY DEEL <samuel.ppc@yahoo.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Sun, Mar 25, 2001 9:52 PM Subject: Sale of Lloyd Property The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors: Bob Johnson, Butch Church, Joe McNamara, Fuzzy Minnix, Harry Nickens Gentlemen: My name is Larry Deel. I attend Christian Life Fellowship in Salem, Virginia, which is in Roanoke County. I am writing you to render my support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. I think this sale or trade would be very beneficial to the church and to Roanoke County. A trade would benefit the county for years to come in added community property or business tax dollars. I hope to attend the meeting on Tuesday night. Thanks and God bless you. Larry Deel 655 Joan Circle Salem VA 24153 Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Personal Address -Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. zBoard of Supervisors -Your Support! Page 1 From: "Charles Hamilton" <doulos@msn.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Sun, Mar 25, 2001 9:54 PM Subject: Your Support! To: Mr. Bob Johnson, Hollins District Mr. Joseph B. Butch Church, Catawaba District Mr. Joseph P. McNamara, Windsor Hills Mr. H. Odell Minnix, Cave Spring District Dr. Harry C. Nicken, Vinton District Dir Sirs, My name is Charles E. Hamilton and I live in the Roanoke County. I am a member in good standing at Christian Life Fellowship church in Salem, Virginia. I am writing to ask you for your support for the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. After review, I believe that these proposals concerning the Lloyd property would be of great benefit for Roanoke County as well as Christian Life Fellowship. I also believe that the added community property and/or business tax dollars would be a major plus to the Roanoke County and the board of supervisors. I look forward to seeing you and discussing this issue at Tuesday nights meeting. Thank-you for your consideration in this very important matter, Charles E. Hamilton 2808 Ellison Ave. Salem, VA<brctear=all><hr>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at <a href="http://explorer.msn.com">http://explorer.msn.com</a> zBoard of Supervisors - I need your support Page 1 From: "Charles Hamilton" <doulos7@hotmail.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Sun, Mar 25, 2001 9:57 PM Subject: I need your support To: Mr. Bob Johnson, Hollins District Mr. Joseph B. Butch Church, Catawaba District Mr. Joseph P. McNamara, Windsor Hills Mr. H. Odell Minnix, Cave Spring District Dr. Harry C. Nicken, Vinton District Dir Sirs, My name is Charlie Hamilton and I live in the Roanoke County. I am a member in good standing at Christian Life Fellowship church in Salem, Virginia. I am writing to ask you for your support for the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. After review, I believe that these proposals concerning the Lloyd property would be of great benefit for Roanoke County as well as Christian Life Fellowship. I also believe that the added community property and/or business tax dollars would be a major plus to the Roanoke County and the board of supervisors. I look forward to seeing you and discussing this issue at Tuesday nights meeting. Thank-you for your consideration in this very important matter, Charlie Hamilton ~ zBoard of Supervisors - Support a proposal! Page 1 From: "Suzanne Hamilton" <doule7@hotmail.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Sun, Mar 25, 2001 9:59 PM Subject: Support a proposal! To: Mr. Bob Johnson, Hollins District Mr. Joseph B. Butch Church, Catawaba District Mr. Joseph P. McNamara, Windsor Hills Mr. H. Odell Minnix, Cave Spring District Dr. Harry C. Nicken, Vinton District Dir Sirs, My name is Suzanne Hamilton and I live in the Roanoke County. I am a member in good standing at Christian Life Fellowship church in Salem, Virginia. I am writing to ask you for your support for the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. After review, I believe that these proposals concerning the Lloyd property would be of great benefit for Roanoke County as well as Christian Life Fellowship. I also believe that the added community property and/or business tax dollars would be a major plus to the Roanoke County and the board of supervisors. I look forward to seeing you and discussing this issue at Tuesday nights meeting. Thank-you for your consideration in this very important matter, Suzanne Hamilton zBoard of Supervisors -property Page 1 From: "Colleen Oliver" <olivercottage@hotmail.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Sun, Mar 25, 2001 10:13 PM Subject: property zBoard of Supervisors -Christian Life Fellowship Page 1 From: <Djdtypes@aol.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Sun, Mar 25, 2001 10:17 PM Subject: Christian Life Fellowship Gentlemen: My name is Donetta Dotson and I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship which is located at 4335 West Main Street, Salem, which is in Roanoke County. I am writing this letter in support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. It appears to me that the trade of the Lloyd property would be a good move for Roanoke County as well as the church. A trade will certainly benefit the county for years to come in added community property or business tax dollars. I will see you Tuesday night at the meeting. Thank you. Donetta Dotson zBoard of Supervisors - To Roanoke County Board of Supervisors: Page 1 From: <LindaT24@aol.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Sun, Mar 25, 2001 10:20 PM Subject: To Roanoke County Board of Supervisors: Mr. Bob Johnson, Hollins District Mr. Joseph B. Butch Church, Catawaba District Mr. Joseph P. McNamara, Windsor Hills Mr. H. Odell Minnix, Cave Spring District Dr. Harry C. Nicken, Vinton District Dear Sirs, My name is Linda Trail and I'm a member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street Salem VA which is in Roanoke County. I wanted to let you know that I support the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. I think that the trade of the Lloyd property would be good for Roanoke County as well as our Church. It would certainly benefit the county for years to come in added community property or business tax dollars. I will see you Tuesday night at the meeting. Linda Trail zBoard of Supervisors - Transfer of the Lloyd Land to Christian Life Fellowship Page 1 From: <ODIE616@aol.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 8:30 AM Subject: Transfer of the Lloyd Land to Christian Life Fellowship Dear Supervisors: My name is Angie Deacon and I have been a lifelong resident of Roanoke County as well as a member of Christian Life Fellowship. The intent of my email today is to ask respectfully that the Board, and most especially my district representative, Mr. Johnson to vote in favor of the sale/trade of the Lloyd property located in Roanoke County. I feel that such a deal would benefit both parties involved. Our church is not only interested in the spiritual growth of our community, but we are also interested in teaching our members and neighbors how to be good citizens as well. Our Pastor has spoken very highly of this Board and I thank you in advance for your favorable vote as well as your integrity and compassion during this long process. I plan on attending the Meeting tomorrow night and will look forward to seeing you all there. Sincerely, Angie K. Deacon ~ zBoard of Supervisors -The Lloyd Land Sale to Christian Life Fellowship Page 1 From: <ODIE616@aol.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 8:31 AM Subject: The Lloyd Land Sale to Christian Life Fellowship Dear Board of Supervisors, My name is Larry Deacon and I am a resident of Roanoke County. I have also been a member of Christian Life Fellowship for the past 5 years. I have been mindful of the recent negations with the County for the Lloyd property. The intent of my email today is to ask you the honorable Board of Supervisors and most especially my district representative Mr. Johnson, to vote in favor of this sale/trade of property. I feel that a vote in favor of this transaction would benefit both Roanoke County and Christian Life Fellowship. Not only would there be additional tax revenues, but also I feel the overall betterment of the area would occur due to the presence of a church that is very interested in not only in the spiritual growth of it's community but the making of better citizens as well. I thank you for you vote in advance and also thank you for the integrity you have shown in these negotiations. I plan to be at the Board Meeting Tuesday evening and will look forward to seeing you there. Sincerely, Larry D. Deacon zBoard of Supervisors -Sale of Lloyd Property Page 1 From: "Shawn Meadows" <Ism@mc-rke.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 8:34 AM Subject: Sale of Lloyd Property Gentlemen on the Board of Supervisors, Hello, my name is Shawn Meadows. I am a member at Christian Life Fellowship Church. I am writing this letter to show the support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship Church. It seems that the trade would be good for Roanoke County and I know that it would be beneficial to the Church. I thank you for your time and I will see you Tuesday night at the meeting. Sincerely, Shawn Meadows zBoard of Supervisors -Attention: Mr. Bob Johnson Page 1 From: <Rn2mcyseat@aol.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 8:41 AM Subject: Attention: Mr. Bob Johnson To: Mr. Bob Johnson, Hollins District Mr. Johnson, Sir: My name is Kathryne H. Ray and I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street Salem, Virginia, which is in the County of Roanoke. I am writing this letter to ask you to please vote in favor of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Fellowship. I feel that this would be an excellent move for Roanoke County, not to mention the benefit that would be realized by the County in added community property and business tax dollars. I am in your Magisterial District, and I will see you Tuesday night at the meeting. Thank you. Respectfully, Kathryne H. Ray 5869 Buckland Mill Road Roanoke, Virginia 24019 563-5358 zBoard of Supervisors - To Roanke Co. Board of Supervisors: Page 1 From: <SFORCE7@aol.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 8:55 AM Subject: To Roanke Co. Board of Supervisors: Dear Sirs: My name is Stephanie Miller and I a regular attendee of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street Salem, VA which is in Roanoke County. I am also a residence of Roanoke County my children attend Glenvar High School and our church. I am writing this letter in support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. It appears to me that the trade of the Lloyd property would be a good move for Roanoke County as well as our church. A trade will certainly benefit the county for years to come in added community property or business tax dollars. Thank-you I will see you Tuesday night at the meeting. zBoard of Supervisors - To: Mssrs. Johnson, Church, McNamara, Minnix, Nicken Page 1 From: <R4PAR4SURE@cs.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 9:11 AM Subject: To: Mssrs. Johnson, Church, McNamara, Minnix, Nicken My name is Rod Ballard & I am a regular member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street, Salem, VA, which is in Roanoke County. I support the proposed land sale of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship & will be keenly watching the progress of this venture, which would benefit both the county of Roanoke (business tax dollars) & our church (improved facilities & room for expansion. It is a win-win. I ask your continued support, & I look forward to meeting you at the meeting Tuesday evening. zBoard of Supervisors -Fwd: To: Mr.Johnson Page 1 From: <R4PAR4SURE@cs.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 9:12 AM Subject: Fwd: To: Mr.Johnson My name is Rod Ballard & I am a regular member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street, Salem, VA, which is in Roanoke County. I support the proposed land sale of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship & will be keenly watching the progress of this venture, which would benefit both the county of Roanoke (business tax dollars) & our church (improved facilities & room for expansion. It is a win-win. I ask your continued support, & I look forward to meeting you at the meeting Tuesday evening. zBoard of Supervisors - Mr. Church Page 1~ From: <R4PAR4SURE@cs.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 9:12 AM Subject: Mr. Church My name is Rod Ballard & I am a regular member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street, Salem, VA, which is in Roanoke County. I support the proposed land sale of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship & will be keenly watching the progress of this venture, which would benefit both the county of Roanoke (business tax dollars) & our church (improved facilities & room for expansion. It is a win-win. I ask your continued support, & I look forward to meeting you at the meeting Tuesday evening. zBoard of Supervisors - Mr. McNamara Page 1 L --- From: <R4PAR4SURE@cs.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 9:13 AM Subject: Mr. McNamara My name is Rod Ballard & I am a regular member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street, Salem, VA, which is in Roanoke County. I support the proposed land sale of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship & will be keenly watching the progress of this venture, which would benefit both the county of Roanoke (business tax dollars) & our church (improved facilities & room for expansion. It is a win-win. I ask your continued support, & I look forward to meeting you at the meeting Tuesday evening. l zBoard of Supervisors - Mr. Minnix Page 1 From: <R4PAR4SURE@cs.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2001 9:13 AM Subject: Mr. Minnix My name is Rod Ballard & I am a regular member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street, Salem, VA, which is in Roanoke County. I support the proposed land sale of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship & will be keenly watching the progress of this venture, which would benefit both the county of Roanoke (business tax dollars) & our church (improved facilities & room for expansion. It is a win-win. I ask your continued support, & I look forward to meeting you at the meeting Tuesday evening. zBoard of Supervisors -Christian Life Fellowship Page 1 From: <Grddrives@aol.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Sun, Mar 25, 2001 10:20 PM Subject: Christian Life Fellowship Gentlemen: My name is Gary Dotson and I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street, Salem, which is located in Roanoke County. I am writing this letter in support of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. It appears to me that the trade of the Lloyd property would be a good move for Roanoke County as well as the church. A trade will certainly benefit the county for years to come in added community property or business tax dollars. I will see you at Tuesday's meeting. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. In Christ, Gary Dotson r- zBoard of Supervisors -Christian Life Fellowship Page 1 From: <Sk8brdr4jesus@aol.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Sun, Mar 25, 2001 10:22 PM Subject: Christian Life Fellowship Gentlemen: My name is Matthew Jones and I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship at 4335 West Main Street, Salem, which is located in Roanoke County. I am writing this letter to show my support for the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. It appears to me that the trade of the Lloyd property would be a good move for Roanoke County as well as the church. A trade will certainly benefit the county for years to come in added community property or business tax dollars. I will see you at Tuesday's meeting. Thank you. In Christ, Matthew Jones zBoard of Supervisors -The selling or trading of the Lloyd property Page 1 From: "Johnathan Hatcher" <jhatcher0@msn.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Sun, Mar 25, 2001 10:46 PM Subject: The selling or trading of the Lloyd property Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Mr. Bob Johnson, Mr. Joseph B. Butch Church, Mr. Joseph P. McNamara, Mr. H. Odell Minnex, and Dr. Harry C. Nicken Gentlemen, my name is Katherine Hatcher and I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship on West Maine Street Salem in Roanoke County. I am writing in support of the sale or trade of the Lloyd property to Christian Life Fellowship. It appears that the trade would be a good move for both parties. A trade would certainly benefit the county in added community property or business tax dollars. We thank you for your time and I will see you at the meeting Yuesday night. <hr>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at <a href="http://explorer.msn.com">http://explorer.msn.com</a> zBoard of Supervisors -Lloyd Property Page 1 From: <DaKingskids@aol.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Sun, Mar 25, 2001 10:52 PM Subject: Lloyd Property Dear Mr. Johnson, I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship Church in Salem, Va. and am writing to request that you vote in favor of the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property. I believe this sale and/or trade would benefit both my county and my church. I look forward to seeing you at the Tuesday night board of Supervisors meeting. Sincerely, Ken McKinney Roanoke County Resident i zBoard of Supervisors -Lloyd Property Page 1 , ~- From: <DaKingskids@aol.com> To: <bos@co.roanoke.va.us> Date: Sun, Mar 25, 2001 10:57 PM Subject: Lloyd Property Dear Dr. Nickens, I am a member of Christian Life Fellowship Church in Salem, Va. and live on Bent Mountain in Roanoke County. I am writing to ask for your support for the sale and/or trade of the Lloyd property. I believe this transaction will benefit both my county and my church. Thank you for your support in this matter and your time. I will see you at the Board of Supervisors meeting this Tuesday. Sincerely, Pattie McKinney Bent Mountain Resident S, 0 „ 2~~0~ ui ~ ~o~~;lu~~~s~ ~~~ ~s~~, ~.