Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
6/26/2001 - Regular
~or~i~cg ~ocunte~t - ~u~1ect to ~.ebi~ior~ ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION AGENDA JUNE 26, 2001 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m. on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. The meetings are broadcast live on RVTV, Channel 3, will be rebroadcast on Thursday at 7 P.M. and Saturday at 4 p.m., and are now closed captioned. Individuals who require assistance or special arrangements to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings should contact the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772-2005 at least 48 hours in advance so reasonable accommodations may be made. PLEASE NOTE: There will be an Audit Committee Meeting of 2:00 p.m. prior to the regular Board of Supervisors Meeting in the fourth floor Conference Room. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call ALL PRESENT AT 3:00 P.M. 2. Invocation: The Honorable H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix Chairman, Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS 1 PMM ADDED CLOSED MEETING PURSUANT TO SECTION 2.1-344 A (71 CONSULTATION WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING PROBABLE LITIGATION, VDOT AND ROUTE 419 ROAD IMPROVEMENTS. JBC ASKED TO DEFER ACTION ON ITEM N-9. COMMUNICATIONS OF FINDINGS FROM PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW OF PROPOSED CITY OF ROANOKE PARKING LOT ON CARVINS COVE ROAD UNTIL THE EVENING SESSION, ITEM S-1 HCN REQUESTED ITEM K-4, WORK SESSION WITH ROANOKE- ALLEGHANY REGIONAL COMMISSION. METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION AND VDOT AS IT RELATES TO CURRENT PLANS FOR I- 73 C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS Certificate of recognition to Dr. Norma Jean Peters for being named Virginia Library Trustee of the year by the Virginia Public Library Directors Association. ECH ADDED RECOGNITION HOM PRESENTED CERTIFICATES TO DR. PETERS D. BRIEFINGS 1. Update on the County of Roanoke's Website redesign. (Elaine Carver, Information Technology Director and Kathi Scearce, Community Relations Director) E. CARVER AND K. SCEARCE PRESENTED UPDATE E. NEW BUSINESS Request to adopt a prioritized list of primary and interstate projects to be presented at the pre-allocation public hearing for the Commonwealth Transportation Board Six-Year Improvement Plan. (Arnold Covey, Community Development Director) R-062601-1 JPM MOTION TO ADOPT RESO AMENDED BY HCN TO ADD HARDY ROAD TO ITEM 6 2 URC 2. Request from Norfolk Southern to negotiate a settlement agreement concerning increased wayside noise in Roanoke County. (Elmer Hodge, County Administrator) A-062601-2 HOM MOTION AMENDED BY HCN TO APPROVE ALT #1 (AUTHORIZE THE COUNTY ADM. TO CONTACT THE PROPERTY OWNERS WHO MEET THE NOISE THRESHOLD TO SEE IF THEY WISH THE COUNTY TO HELP THE CITIZENS FACILITATE THE NOISE ABATEMENT CAUSED BY THE RAIL TRAFFIC.) URC 3. Acceptance of Infopowering Grants for $40,620 awarded by the Library of Virginia and appropriation of grant funds to the Public Library Budget. (Diana Rosapepe, Library Director) A-062601-3 HOM MOTION TO APPROVE URC 4. Request to appropriate $197,377 in state funds for housing inmates to offset expenses already incurred. (Brent Robertson, Budget Director) A-062601-4 HCN MOTION TO APPROVE URC 5. Request for acceptance of $534,538 Hazard Mitigation Grant for Carvin Creek, Phase II. (Arnold Covey, Community Development Director) A-062601-5 BLJ MOTION TO APPROVE URC F. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA: Approval of these items does not indicate support for, or judge the merits of, the 3 requested zoning actions but satisfies procedural requirements and schedules the Public Hearings which will be held after recommendation by the Planning Commission. HCN MOTION TO APPROVE 1ST READING AFTER COMMENTS BY HCN ON ITEMS 2 AND 3. AND BLJ ON 2 AND 5 2ND READINGS AND PUBLIC HEARINGS -JULY 24, 2001 1. First reading of ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit to construct a broadcast tower on 34.83 acres located on the Bent Mountain Substation, 8920 Willett Lane, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the petition of American Tower Corporation. 2. First reading of ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit to develop a golf course on 364 acres located on 3608 Pitzer Road, SE, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of Nathaniel C. Haile. ~1) HCN REQUESTED THAT STAFF PROVIDE COPIES OF BOTH PLANS FOR GOLF COURSE AND HOLD WORK SESSION IN THE FUTURE ~2) BLJ ASKED THAT PLANNING COMMISSION LOOK AT THE IMPACT OF I-73. 3. First reading of ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit and rezoning from C1-C to C1-C to amend conditions to construct two offices on the back of the existing building and expand the parking lot on .5 acres located at 3716 Colonial Avenue, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Paychecks Plus. HCN REQUESTED THE STAFF PROVIDE THE PREVIOUS RESTRICTIONS PLACED ON THE PROPERTY. BLJ ASKED FOR THE ORIGINAL PETITION. 4. First reading of ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit for a new convenience store and gasoline station on .873 acres located at 5944 Catawba Valley Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Craw-Mart, Inc. 5. First reading of ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit to construct a cluster subdivision on 14.25 acres located between Merriman Road and Crystal Creek Drive and 600 feet west of Cartwright Drive, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Caldwell White Associates. 4 6. First reading of ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit for a retail store on .601 acres located at 4347 Valley Avenue, Cave Spring Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the petition of Play It Again Sports. G. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES NONE H. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Second reading of ordinance authorizing conveyance of an easement to Appalachian Power Company for electric service to Starkey Park owned by the Board of Supervisors. (Jeff Balon, Parks, Recreation and Tourism Department) 0-062601-6 HOM MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC APPOINTMENTS 1. Clean Valley Council 2. League of Older Americans Advisory Council 3. Roanoke County Cable Television Committee HCN NOMINATED JAMES DICKEY TO ANOTHER THREE YEAR TERM WHICH WILL EXPIRE JUNE 13, 2004 4. Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission 5. Roanoke Valley Regional Cable Television Committee HCN NOMINATED JAMES DICKEY TO SERVE ANOTHER THREE YEAR TERM WHICH WILL EXPIRE JUNE 30, 2004 6. Social Services Advisory Board 5 J. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN 'THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. R-062601-7 BLJ MOTION TO ADOPT CONSENT RESO URC 1. Approval of minutes for April 24, 2001, May 8, 2001 and May 10, 2001. 2. Confirmation of committee appointment to Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission. A-062601-7.a 3. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving Waterford, Section 7. A-062601-7.b 4. Approval of resolution to Virginia Department of Health, Office of Emergency Medical Services, urging delay of the effective date of new EMS regulations from January 1, 2002 until January 1, 2003. R-062601-7.c 5. Approval of salary increases of 4 percent for County Administrator and County Attorney. R-062601-7.d 6. Endorsement of the Blue Ridge-Southwest Virginia Film Office, Inc., as the official agency with the Virginia Film Office to recruit movie and television film production in Southwest Virginia. 6 R-062601-7.e 7. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving Brookfield, Section 1 and 2. A-062601-7.f K. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS 1. Request for work session on July 10, 2001 with Virginia Department of Transportation on Colonial Avenue Road project. WORK SESSION SCHEDULED FOR 7/10/01 2. Request for work session on July 10 regarding establishing an Environmental Management System. WORK SESSION SCHEDULED FOR 7/10/01 3. Request for work session on July 24, 2001 regarding implementation of ambulance fees for service. WORK SESSION SCHEDULED FOR 7/24/01 HCN ASKED FOR DETAILS OF THIS WORK SESSION IN ADVANCE AND THAT ISSUES BROUGHT UP BY RESCUE SQUADS BE ADDRESSED SUCH A HOLDING HARMLESS FOR FUND RAISING AND PAPERWORK ISSUE 4. Request for work session with Roanoke Valley-Alleghany Regional Commission, Metropolitan Planning Organization, and VDOT to relate current plans for I-73. AS REQUESTED EARLIER BY HCN L. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS NONE M. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS NONE 7 N. REPORTS HCN MOTION TO RECEIVE AND FILE REPORTS WITH ITEM N-9 REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION UNDER S-1 AT THE EVENING SESSION AND DISCUSSION OF ITEM 3 URC 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance BLJ SUGGESTED REMOVING NOTE CONCERNING REIMBURSEMENT FROM VIRGINIA GAS PIPELINE FROM REPORT 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Future School Capital Reserve 5. Revenues and Expenditures for the eleven months ended May 31, 2001 6. Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investment and Portfolio Policy, as of May 31, 2001 7. Accounts Paid -May, 2001 8. List of changes to the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System in May, 2001 O. CLOSED MEETING pursuant to Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (5) discussion concerning a prospective business or industry where no previous announcement has been made; 2.1-344 A (7) Consultation with legal counsel concerning negotiation of a contract with the Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority and Explore Foundation and Section 2.1- 344 A (7) consultation with legal counsel regarding probable litigation, VDOT and Route 419 road improvements. 8 HOM MOTION TO GO INTO CLOSED MEETING AT 4:20 P.M. URC CLOSED MEETING HELD FROM 4:30 P.M. UNTIL 6:00 P.M. P. WORK SESSION (4T" FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM) NONE EVENING SESSION Q. CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION R-062601-8 HOM MOTION TO ADOPT CERTIFICATION RESO URC R. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Second reading of ordinance to obtain Special Use Permits for 48 acres for a church and day care facilities, located on the 5400 block of Indian Grave Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of the Trustees of Evangel Foursquare Church. (Janet Scheid, Senior Planner) SIX CITIZENS SPOKE JPM CALLED FOR QUESTION AYES: JPM, JBC, HCN, HOM NAYS: BLJ 0-062601-9 HCN MOTION TO ADOPT ORD WITH CONDITIONS: (11 REVISION TO CONDITION #5 CONCERNING ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND VDOT: (2) ADD TO ORDINANCE THAT BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT TRAFFIC SIGN BE INSTALLED AT INTERSECTION OF INDIAN GRAVE ROAD: AND (3) ADD CONDITION #6 FROM STAFF REPORT CONCERNING PUBLIC WATER AND SEWER AYES: BLJ. JBC, HCN NAYS: JPM, HOM 9 2. Second reading of ordinance to rezone 7.94 acres from I-2 Industrial District to AR Agriculture/Residential District for residences, located at Peaceful Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Richard A. Hall. (Janet Scheid, Senior Planner) 0-062601-10 JBC MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC 3. Second reading of ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit for a private horse stable on 3.617 acres located at 4390 Harborwood Road, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of James and Sandra Worley. (Janet Scheid, Senior Planner) 0-062601-11 JBC MOTION TO ADOPT ORD URC 4. Second reading of ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit to construct a new school on 21.12 acres located on the north side of Buck Mountain Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Faith Christian School. (Janet Scheid, Senior Planner) FOUR CITIZENS SPOKE 0-062601-12 HOM MOTION TO ADOPT ORD WITH TWO CONDITIONS ADDED URC 5. Second reading of ordinance reapportioning the representation in the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, by altering the boundaries of the election districts by establishing voting precincts therefor, incorporating a map showing the boundaries of said districts and precincts, changing polling places, and providing for an effective date of this ordinance. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) TWO CITIZENS SPOKE 0-062601-13 HCN MOTION TO ADOPT ORD 10 URC S. CITIZEN COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS 1. Robert Edwards expressed concerns about proliferation of signs along Plantation Road. EMS and expense of primary elections. 2. Annie Krochalis, expressed concerns about agenda item F.1 proposed tower on Bent Mountain; and others from the Bent Mountain Civic League meeting 1. Communication of findings from Planning Commission review of proposed City of Roanoke parking lot on Carvins Cove Road JBC REMOVED FROM REPORTS FOR DISCUSSION NINE CITIZENS SPOKE STAFF DIRECTED TO WORK WITH THE CITY OF ROANOKE ON ROAD TRAFFIC AND SAFETY ISSUES OF CONCERN AS DISCUSSED BY THE BOARD BLJ TO RECEIVE AND FILE REPORT URC T. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS Supervisor Church: (1) Advised that he attended dedication of Camp Roanoke and appreciated good coverage from media, especially Roanoke Times, and thanked everyone involved. ~) Asked ECH to check on situation where citizen received three mailings after sending one check for personal property taxes. ECH will check with Treasurer's Office. Supervisor Johnson: (1) Advised that he was unable to attend dedication of Camp Roanoke due to death of his father-in-law and expressed appreciation for respects shown to his family by HOM, JBC on behalf of Board and ECH on behalf of staff. ~2) Commented on redistricting concerns of Hollins School Board member but did not think it was manageable because it split communities of interest. Supervisor McNamara: ~) Asked that investment policy be amended to eliminate commercial paper being invested in individual companies. 11 PMM advised that he will bring the policy back for discussion and changes. (2) Inquired when the BPOL taxes and strategy would be discussed by the Board. ECH advised that work session is being planned for July 10tH. Supervisor Minnix: (1) Advised that he received many calls concerning new crossover at Rt 419 and 221. Asked that Staff prepare a resolution for July 10 meeting to ask VDOT to address road improvements at Route 419 and Brambleton and the adverse affect of crossover. U. ADJOURNMENT HOM ADJOURNED AT 10:17 P.M. 12 O~ pOAN ,5.~ ~ ~: ~ ~ ov- ,~ ,az 1838 ~ff~~~ ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA JUNE 26, 2001 Welcome to the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors meeting. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m. on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. The meetings are broadcast live on RVTV, Channel 3, will be rebroadcast on Thursday at 7 P.M. and Saturday at 4 p.m., and are now closed captioned. Individuals who require assistance or special arrangements to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings should contact the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772-2005 at least 48 hours in advance so reasonable accommodations may be made. C~.~ixz~tg ~f ~.~~xx~aC~e PLEASE NOTE: There will be an Audit Committee Meeting at 2:00 p.m. prior to the regular Board of Supervisors Meeting in the fourth floor Conference Room. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 P.M.) 1. Roll Call 2. Invocation: The Honorable H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix Chairman, Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag B. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS, AND AWARDS D. BRIEFINGS 1 ® Recycled Paper 1. Update on the County of Roanoke's Website redesign. (Elaine Carver, Information Technology Director and Kathi Scearce, Community Relations Director) E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request to adopt a prioritized list of primary and interstate projects to be presented at the pre-allocation public hearing for the Commonwealth Transportation Board Six-Year Improvement Plan. (Arnold Covey, Community Development Director) 2. Request from Norfolk Southern to negotiate a settlement agreement concerning increased wayside noise in Roanoke County. (Elmer Hodge, County Administrator) 3. Acceptance of Infopowering Grants for $40,620 awarded by the Library of Virginia and appropriation of grant funds to the Public Library Budget. (Diana Rosapepe, Library Director) 4. Request to appropriate $197,377 in state funds for housing inmates to offset expenses already incurred. (Brent Robertson, Budget Director) 5. Request for acceptance of $534,538 Hazard Mitigation Grant for Carvin Creek, Phase II. (Arnold Covey, Community Development Director) F. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA: Approval of these items does not indicate support for, or judge the merits of, the requested zoning actions but satisfies procedural requirements and schedules the Public Hearings which will be held after recommendation by the Planning Commission. 1. First reading of ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit to construct a broadcast tower on 34.83 acres located on the Bent Mountain Substation, 8920 Willett Lane, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the petition of American Tower Corporation. 2. First reading of ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit to develop a golf course on 364 acres located on 3608 Pitzer Road, SE, Vinton Magisterial District, upon the petition of Nathaniel C. Haile. 2 3. First reading of ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit and rezoning from C1-C to C1-C to amend conditions to construct two offices on the back of the existing building and expand the parking lot on .5 acres located at 3716 Colonial Avenue, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Paychecks Plus. 4. First reading of ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit for a new convenience store and gasoline station on .873 acres located at 5944 Catawba Valley Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Craw-Mart, Inc. 5. First reading of ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit to construct a cluster subdivision on 14.25 acres located between Merriman Road and Crystal Creek Drive and 600 feet west of Cartwright Drive, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Caldwell White Associates. 6. First reading of ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit for a retail store on .601 acres located at 4347 Valley Avenue, Cave Spring Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the petition of Play It Again Sports. G. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES H. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Second reading of ordinance authorizing conveyance of an easement to Appalachian Power Company for electric service to Starkey Park owned by the Board of Supervisors. (Mark Courtright, Assistant Director of Parks) I. APPOINTMENTS 1. Clean Valley Council 2. League of Older Americans Advisory Council 3. Roanoke County Cable Television Committee 4. Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission 5. Roanoke Valley Regional Cable Television Committee 3 6. Social Services Advisory Board J. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Approval of minutes for April 24, 2001, May 8, 2001 and May 10, 2001. 2. Confirmation of committee appointment to Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission. 3. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving Waterford, Section 7. 4. Approval of resolution to Virginia Department of Health, Office of Emergency Medical Services, urging delay of the effective date of new EMS regulations from January 1, 2002 until January 1, 2003. 5. Approval of salary increases of 4 percent for County Administrator and County Attorney. 6. Endorsement of the Blue Ridge-Southwest Virginia Film Office, Inc., as the official agency with the Virginia Film Office to recruit movie and television film production in Southwest Virginia. 7. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving Brookfield, Section 1 and 2. K. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS 1. Request for work session on July 10, 2001 with Virginia Department of Transportation on Colonial Avenue Road project. 2. Request for work session on July 10 regarding establishing an Environmental Management System. 3. Request for work session on July 24, 2001 regarding implementation 4 of ambulance fees for service. L. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS M. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS N. REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Future School Capital Reserve 5. Revenues and Expenditures for the eleven months ended May 31, 2001 6. Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investment and Portfolio Policy, as of May 31, 2001 7. Accounts Paid -May, 2001 8. List of changes to the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System in May, 2001 9. Communication of findings from Planning Commission review of proposed City of Roanoke parking lot on Carvins Cove Road O. CLOSED MEETING pursuant to Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (5) discussion concerning a prospective business or industry where no previous announcement has been made; and 2.1-344 A (7) Consultation with legal counsel concerning negotiation of a contract with the Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority and Explore Foundation P. WORK SESSION (4T" FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM) EVENING SESSION 5 Q. CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION R. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Second reading of ordinance to obtain Special Use Permits for 48 acres for a church and day care facilities, located on the 5400 block of Indian Grave Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of the Trustees of Evangel Foursquare Church. (Janet Scheid, Senior Planner) 2. Second reading of ordinance to rezone 7.94 acres from I-2 Industrial District to AR Agriculture/Residential District for residences, located at Peaceful Drive, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Richard A. Hall. (Janet Scheid, Senior Planner) 3. Second reading of ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit for a private horse stable on 3.617 acres located at 4390 Harborwood Road, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of James and Sandra Worley. (Janet Scheid, Senior Planner) 4. Second reading of ordinance to obtain a Special Use Permit to construct a new school on 21.12 acres located on the north side of Buck Mountain Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Faith Christian School. (Janet Scheid, Senior Planner) 5. Second reading of ordinance reapportioning the representation in the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, by altering the boundaries of the election districts by establishing voting precincts therefor, incorporating a map showing the boundaries of said districts and precincts, changing polling places, and providing for an effective date of this ordinance. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) S. CITIZEN COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS T. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS U. ADJOURNMENT 6 f ACTION NO ITEM NUMBER ~ ' ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 26, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: Update on Website Redesign and eGovernment Initiative COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: In the redesign of the County's Website, we are focused much more on getting information to the citizens and their ability to interact with us. 1 think you will enjoy the new look and the new website that we have put together for the civic leagues in the County. We plan to take about ten minufes to share this with you. BACKGROUND: In the late 1990s Roanoke County brought its Internet site online. With the help of webmasters in each department, we have been able to maintain the website with minimal cost. Most of the data on our site is of an informational nature with some eGovernment functions provided in different places on the site. The March 2001 edition of Government Technology quoted a recent study by the National Information Consortium that said 65% of adults online have executed at least one eGovernment transaction, and that by 2002 more than one-third of the population will use the Internet as their primary source for accessing government services. Laying the groundwork for providing County citizens with enhanced eGovernment services necessitated a redesign of our website. Our task had several key components; make the site easier to navigate, improve the appearance and appeal of the website and most of all provide our citizens with 24 x 7 access to the information and services they want and need. In addition to the County's newly redesigned website, the Community Relations Department has created a RoanokE; County Civic and Neighborhood Organizations website. As a part of the County's eGovernment Initiative, this new site provides information about civic league activities to the community, as well as offering citizens another information resource for issues that will, or may potentially, affect them. 1 ~~~ Today we want to give the Board of Supervisors, and the viewing public, a preview of the County's redesigned website as well as a brief snapshot of the civic groups new site. Access to the County's enhanced website will be available to the public on July 2, 2001. The new site for the County's civic groups can be found at www.co. roanoke.va.us/communit/civicleaques/ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This presentation will give the Board a preview of the County's new website changes and enhancements. We will provide a brief overview of the following topics: • Comparison between existing and new site; • Brief explanation of navigation and content improvements; • Preview of the new Civic League website; and • Outline of plan for providing additional eGovernment services. Respectfully Submitted by Elaine Carver, Director, Information Technology and Kathi Scearce, Director, Community Relations Approved by: ~,~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Motion by: Church No. Yes Abs Johnson McNamara Minnix __ Nickens 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON JUNE 26, 2001 RESOLUTION 062601-1 REQUESTING VDOT TO CONTINUE FUNDING PROJECTS CURRENTLY IDENTIFIED ON THE PLAN AND ADOPT THOSE PROJECTS IDENTIFIED AS "PROJECTS NOT ON PLAN" FOR INCLUSION INTO THE 2001-2007 PRIMARY AND INTERSTATE SIX YEAR IMPROVEMENT PLAN WHEREAS, the Six Year Improvement Program is the Commonwealth Transportation Board's plan for identifying funds anticipated to be available for highway and other forms of transportation construction; and WHEREAS, this program is updated annually to assist in the allocation of federal and state funds for interstate, primary, and secondary roads. BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia as follows: and 1. That the following projects identified as "Projects on Plan" are recommended to continue to receive funding for planning and construction Interstate 73 -Roanoke County continues to be very supportive of this project. In a letter dated June 3, 2001, the Board of Supervisors encouraged VDOT to work closely with the impacted citizens to address their concerns and mitigate any negative impacts to them. This is in addition to the resolution 120500-2 passed December 5, 2000 reaffirming the Boards support for I-73. Interstate 81 -Roanoke County continues to support VDOT's proposed plan to widen I-81 from its present four lanes. We look forward to reviewing the prioritized segments of I-81 and want to continue to work with local VDOT staff to develop regional cooperation for stormwater detention facilities and potential utility crossings. Route 11/460 (West Main Street) -Roanoke County continues to support the ongoing design for improvements in this important commercial and residential development area. Improvements will provide an increase in the level of service bringing it up to standards required for the expected growth. Route 221 (Bent Mountain Road) -Roanoke County is requesting continued allocation of funds for this road project. The residential development expected to occur within this area will place additional demands on the road system that is currently providing an inadequate service level. 1 5. That the following projects identified as "Projects Not on Plan" have been identified by the Board of Supervisors as extremely important to the growth of Roanoke County or for safety improvements and are requested to be included in the Virginia Transportation Development Plan for Fiscal Years 2001-2007. They are listed in Priority Order: 1. Route 11 (Williamson Road) - Need: Now that Route 11 has been widened from Plantation Road to Hollins College, there remains one section of three lane road from Peters Creek Road (Rte. 117) to the Roanoke City Limits. Additionally, the existing bridge over Carvins Creek does not meet current standards, and the alignment of Florist Road with Route 11 creates additional congestion and safety concerns. The existing section of road, 1.52 miles, is currently a three-lane with the center lane used for turning movements. Ninety percent of the tracts adjacent to Williamson Road are developed for commercial use. Traffic Counts: 15,000 vehicles per day from the Roanoke City limits to Peters Creek Road. This stretch has also been identified as an alternate route in the event of blockage on I-81/581. Recommended Improvements: A four-lane divided highway with appropriate cross over and turn lanes, which will complete improvement of Williamson Road from the city limits to the Botetourt County line. Cost: $12,000,000 2. Route 115 (Plantation Road) Need: The existing road, 2.43 miles, is tow lanes with numerous side connections to residential neighborhoods. The road needs to be improved from Roanoke City limits north to Route 11. If full funding is not available various spot improvements, such as turn lanes, alignment and grade improvements would help with safety issues. Additional land is available along the road for future development, which will increase traffic and construction costs in the future. Traffic Counts: From the Roanoke City limits to Williamson Road, 11,000 vehicles per day. Recommended Improvements: Additional lanes and intersection improvements. Cost: $12,000,000-$15,000,000 3. Route 220 S (Franklin Road) 2 Need: This section of 220 is approximately 2.0 miles long and is a four- lane divided highway. Recently a traffic study was conducted for a commercial development and the report predicted a level of service of D or F within the next couple of years. Additional lanes and improved vertical alignment is required from the Roanoke City limits south to Rte. 668 (Yellow Mountain Road). Spot improvements are needed now at the intersection of 419 and 220 S. Traffic Counts: From the Roanoke City limits south is approximately 44,000 vehicles per day. Recommended Improvements: Additional lanes and intersection improvements. Cost: $5,000,000 - $8,000,000 4. Route 116 (Jae Valley Road) Need: The Salem Residency has notified staff that the bridge over Back Creek is in need of repair and we wish to offer our support for improvements to the approaches and bridge replacement. This road is serving the growing commuter traffic from Franklin County and recreational traffic to Smith Mountain Lake. Traffic Counts: From the Roanoke City limits south: approximately 4,000 vehicles per day. Recommended Improvements: Improve approaches and replace existing bridge. Cost: $3,000,000-$4,000,000 5. Route 311 (Catawba Valley Road) -Intersection Improvements Need: This area has experienced steady growth over the last several years and the congestion at this intersection has increased. Traffic Counts: Rte. 311 has an average daily traffic of 11,000 vpd and Bradshaw Road (Rte. 864) carries approximately 3,200 vpd. Recommended Improvements: Construct a right hand passing lane (left turn lane). Other primary roads in Roanoke County which deserve consideration for spot improvements: 3 6. Route 419 (Electric Road) Intersection improvements, Route 118 (Airport Road), Route 24, (Washington Ave.) improvements at the intersection of William Byrd High School, Route 460 (Challenger Ave.), left and right turn lanes at several existing secondary roads. On motion of Supervisor McNamara amended by Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution and add spot improvements to Hardy Road, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Holto , CMC Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Fred Altizer, District Administrator, VDOT The Honorable Shirley J. Ybarra, Secretary of Transportation and Chairman, Commonwealth Transportation Board Lorinda G. Lionberger, Salem District, Commonwealth Transportation Board Mayor Ralph Smith, City of Roanoke Roanoke Valley Delegation to the General Assembly Senator John Warner, U. S. Senate Senator George Allen, U. S. Senate Congressman Robert Goodlatte Congressman Frederick Boucher 4 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~ I AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 26, 2001 SUBJECT: Adopt a prioritized list of Primary and Interstate projects to be presented at the pre-allocation public hearing for the Virginia Transportation Development Plan, Fiscal Years 2000-2001 thru 2005-2006 COUNTY ADMINISTRATORS COMMENTS: Request approval of the attached list of projects. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: County staff is requesting the Board of Supervisors to adopt a list of Interstate and Primary projects to present to the Virginia Department of Transportation Board Pre-allocation Hearing for fiscal year 2000-2006, on July 1 1, 2001 at the Salem Civic Center. BACKGROUND: The Virginia Transportation Development Plan is the Commonwealth Transportation Board's plan for identifying funds anticipated to be available for highway and other forms of transportation construction for distribution in the 2000-2006 plan. This program is updated annually. As a part of the development of this program, the Transportation Board conducts public hearings in each of the nine construction districts in the state to receive input from members of the General Assembly, members of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, City Council members and members of the general public. Roanoke County is within the Salem District along with eleven (11) other counties and ten (10) cities. All are lobbying for these construction funds. These federal and state funds are allocated according to formulae as mandated by state and federal statutes for interstate, primary and urban roads. 1= - / SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Presently, there are currently six (6) projects on the Transportation Development Plan in Roanoke County. Projects on Plan: Interstate 73 -The CTB has selected a route and is currently preparing a final environmental impact statement to send to the Federal Highway Administration. Approval of the FEIS could take up to a year. Once final approval has been granted by FHWA, final design, right of way acquisition and construction can begin. Estimated cost for Preliminary Engineering from Roanoke to the North Carolina state line is $15.6M. Interstate 81 - VDOT has selected six consultants to develop preliminary designs for the I- 81 upgrade. Once the consultants have completed their work county staff will meet with VDOT to make comments on the plans. Estimated Cost: $215M. Route 11/460 (West Main Street) -The field work for this project has been completed and final design is ongoing. VDOT held a citizen information meeting on April 3, 2001 and is considering comments received from that meeting. Estimated Cost: $22M. Anticipated Construction Date: Beginning in 2005. Route 221 (Brambleton Ave.) -ROW acquisition for phase I is ongoing. Estimated Cost: $1.8M. Anticipated Construction Date: No construction funds are allocated on the current plan. Route 311 (Catawba Valley Drive) -This project has been temporarily placed on hold due to insufficient funding. Interstate 81 Acceleration Lane Extension - VDOT has allocated money to extend the acceleration lanes at the I-581 interchange. This improvement addresses safety concerns and will significantly improve the interchange. Estimated Cost: $2.OM. Roanoke County currently has one TEA-21 project on the plan: Hanging Rock Battlefield Trail -Phase II design is complete and ROW acquisition is underway. Corridor Studies: Route 220 Corridor Study -Alternate Route 220 is being examined at several locations to determine if improvements are required. Several meetings between VDOT, county staff and consultants have taken place. No cost estimates are available. Projects Not On Plan: Route 11 (Williamson Road) -The widening of Rte. 11 North of Rte. 115 leaves a section of three lane road south of Rte. 115 to Roanoke City Corporate limits (existing five lane flush). There is significant congestion along this segment of road and the existing bridge structure is substandard. The district recently lowered the bridge capacity from a 25 to 20-ton weight limit over Carvins Creek. In addition, the acute alignment of Florist Road with Rte. 11 in the same vicinity creates additional congestion and safety concern. We believe that this work will compliment the proposed widening of Rte. 11 from Rte. 115 to Hollins College and have a major positive impact on the North County area. The existing section of road (1.92 miles) in question is a three-lane road with a flush median for turning movements. The alignment is fairly level except for a steep incline adjacent to Boxley Hills. The improvements would probably consist of a five lane flush highway with appropriate turning lanes with an estimated cost of approximately $10,000,000. Route 115 (Plantation Road) - We encourage the continuation of improvements north to Rte. 11; however, if funding is not available for the entire project, Roanoke County is asking consideration be given to additional spot improvements (turn lanes, alignment and grade improvements) at various locations. The existing road (2.43 miles) is a two- lane facility with numerous side connections to residential neighborhoods. Additional land is available for future development. The road is winding in spots with some minor grade changes. The average annual daily traffic estimates for Rte. 115 is approximately 15,000 vpd from Roanoke City Corporate limits to I-81. The improvements would probably consist of a five lane flush highway with appropriate turning lanes with an estimated cost of approximately $10,000,000. Route 116 (Jae Valley Road), Bridge -- VDOT staff has informed us the bridge over Back Creek is in need of replacement. Route 220 S (from Rte. 419 to Buck Mountain Road) -This section of Rte. 220 is partially in Roanoke City and County. Development and traffic in this area has increased tremendously over the past couple of years. We request the Transportation Board review the possibility of adding additional lanes to handle the increasing traffic congestion in this area especially from the intersection of Rte. 419 past Buck Mountain Road. Route 460E (Walmart development) -Route 460E from the Roanoke City limits to alternate Route 220 continues to see increased traffic demands and the proposed development at the intersection of Route 220 will add to traffic counts in this section of Roanoke County. ~- / STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt the prioritized list of projects and resolution to be presented at the pre-allocation hearing on July 21, 2001. County staff will attend the public meeting and is requesting that the Board of Supervisors appoint a representative to attend this meeting. SUBMITTED BY: Arnold Covey, Director Community Development APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved () Motion by: Church Denied O Johnson Received () McNamara Referred () Minnix To () Nickens -1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON JUNE 26, 2001. RESOLUTION REQUESTING VDOT TO CONTINUE FUNDING PROJECTS CURRENTLY IDENTIFIED ON THE PLAN AND ADOPT THOSE PROJECTS IDENTIFIED AS "PROJECTS NOT ON PLAN" FOR INCLUSION INTO THE 2001-2007 PRIMARY AND INTERSTATE SIX YEAR IMPROVEMENT PLAN WHEREAS, the Six Year Improvement Program is the Commonwealth Transportation Board's plan for identifying funds anticipated to be available for highway and other forms of transportation construction; and WHEREAS, this program is updated annually to assist in the allocation of federal and state funds for interstate, primary, and secondary roads. BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia as follows: and 1. That the following projects identified as "Projects on Plan" are recommended to continue to receive funding for planning and construction • Interstate 73 -Roanoke County continues to be very supportive of this project. In a letter dated June 3, 2001, the Board of Supervisors encouraged VDOT to work closely with the impacted citizens to address their concerns and mitigate any negative impacts to them. This is in addition to the resolution 120500-2 passed December 5, 2000 reaffirming the Boards support for I-73. • Interstate 81 -Roanoke County continues to support VDOT's proposed plan to widen I-81 from its present four lanes. We look forward to reviewing the prioritized segments of I-81 and want to continue to work with local VDOT staff to develop regional cooperation for stormwater detention facilities and potential utility crossings. • Route 11/460 (West Main Street) -Roanoke County continues to support the ongoing design for improvements in this important commercial and residential development area. Improvements will provide an increase in the level of service bringing it up to standards required for the expected growth. • Route 221 (Bent Mountain Road) -Roanoke County is requesting continued allocation of funds for this road project. The residential development expected to occur within this area will place additional demands on the road system that is currently providing an inadequate service level. 5. That the following projects identified as "Projects Not on Plan" have been identified by the Board of Supervisors as extremely important to the growth of Roanoke County or for safety improvements and are requested to be included in the Virginia Transportation Development Plan for Fiscal Years 2001-2007. They are listed in Priority Order: ~.- / 1. Route 11 (Williamson Road) - Need: Now that Route 11 has been widened from Plantation Road to Hollins College, there remains one section of three lane road from Peters Creek Road (Rte. 117) to the Roanoke City Limits. Additionally, the existing bridge over Carvins Creek does not meet current standards, and the alignment of Florist Road with Route 11 creates additional congestion and safety concerns. The existing section of road, 1.52 miles, is currently athree-lane with the center lane used for turning movements. Ninety percent of the tracts adjacent to Williamson Road are developed for commercial use. Traffic Counts: 15,000 vehicles per day from the Roanoke City limits to Peters Creek Road. This stretch has also been identified as an alternate route in the event of blockage on I-81/581. Recommended Improvements: Afour-lane divided highway with appropriate cross over and turn lanes, which will complete improvement of Williamson Road from the city limits to the Botetourt County line. Cost: $12,000,000 2. Route 115 (Plantation Road) Need: The existing road, 2.43 miles, is tow lanes with numerous side connections to residential neighborhoods. The road needs to be improved from Roanoke City limits north to Route 11. If full funding is not available , various spot improvements, such as turn lanes, alignment and grade improvements would help with safety issues. Additional land is available along the road for future development, which will increase traffic and construction costs in the future. Traffic Counts: From the Roanoke City limits to Williamson Road, 11,000 vehicles per day. Recommended Improvements: Additional lanes and intersection improvements. Cost: $12,000,000-$15,000,000 3. Route 220 S (Franklin Road) Need: This section of 220 is approximately 2.0 miles long and is a four-lane divided highway. Recently a traffic study was conducted for a commercial development and the report predicted a level of service of D or F within the next couple of years. Additional lanes and improved vertical alignment is required from the Roanoke City limits south to Rte. 668 (Yellow Mountain Road). Spot improvements are needed now at the intersection of 419 and 220 S. E~ / Traffic Counts: From the Roanoke City limits south is approximately 44,000 vehicles per day. Recommended Improvements: Additional lanes and intersection improvements. Cost: $5,000,000 - $8,000,000 4. Route 116 (Jae Valley Road) Need: The Salem Residency has notified staff that the bridge over Back Creek is in need of repair and we wish to offer our support for improvements to the approaches and bridge replacement. This road is serving the growing commuter traffic from Franklin County and recreational traffic to Smith Mountain Lake. Traffic Counts: From the Roanoke City limits south: approximately 4,000 vehicles per day. Recommended Improvements: Improve approaches and replace existing bridge. Cost: $3,000,000-$4,000,000 5. Route 311 (Catawba Valley Road) -Intersection Improvements Need: This area has experienced steady growth over the last several years and the congestion at this intersection has increased. Traffic Counts: Rte. 311 has an average daily traffic of 11,000 vpd and Bradshaw Road (Rte. 864) carries approximately 3,200 vpd. Recommended Improvements: Construct a right hand passing lane (left turn lane). Other primary roads in Roanoke County which deserve consideration for spot improvements: 6. Route 419 (Electric Road) Intersection improvements, Route 118 (Airport Road), Route 24, (Washington Ave.) improvements at the intersection of William Byrd High School, Route 460 (Challenger Ave.), left and right turn lanes at several existing secondary roads. A-062601-2 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER E- ~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 26, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: Request from Norfolk Southern to negotiate a settlement agreement concerning wayside noise in Roanoke County COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: It is my recommendation that Norfolk Southern negotiate directly with the property owners who are affected by the increased traffic. The property owners are the ones most affected and therefore should receive any funds from Non`olk Southern. If you wish for staff to assist the property owners with the negotiations, we will be pleased to do so. BACKGROUND: On July 26, 1998, The Surface Transportation Board (STB) approved the acquisition and control of Conrail, Inc. by NS and CSX Transportation. One of the conditions of the agreement was that NS and CSXT were ordered to take steps to address certain environmental effects on surrounding communities, including increased wayside train noise. The STB established a noise contour boundary along the NS Shenandoah Line from Front Royal to Roanoke, including track in Roanoke County. The STB defined a noise threshold based on technical criteria and identified specific structures that could experience wayside noise from the increased railroad traffic. The criteria includes: (1) the structures must be located within 73 feet of the center of the railroad track; and (2) the structures must meet the noise threshold established by the STB. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The STB identified specific structures within the boundary where NS and CSXT must reduce or "mitigate" the increase in wayside train noise. Qualified structures include homes, schools, churches and hospital. Commercial establishments and unoccupied structures did not qualified, nor was the use of locomotive horns at grade crossings included. 1 'r ~-~ The County GIS system has identified the following structures which are located within 73 feet of the center of the railroad track. The County will confirm with NS if these structures are included in the noise abatement program. 1. 6201 Nell Circle 2. 6204 Nell Circle 3. 7803 Shadwell Drive 4. 5675 Hollins Road It must be emphasized that the STB developed very specific technical criteria for determining which structures qualify. This means that in many situations one structure will be eligible but a neighboring structure will not be, depending on small differences in the position of the structures relative to the tracks or an imperceptible difference in noise levels between one structure and another. NS has offered two options for settlement: They are: Negotiate Settlement Agreement with Property Owners NS can negotiate with the individual property owner to reduce the noise. The goal for the noise reduction is a 10 decibel (dBA) noise reduction with a minimum reduction of 5 dBA. NS offers several options for noise reduction controls. They include: (1) Building sound walls along the railroad tracks. Sound walls could be unsightly, would encourage graffiti and may create potential safety issues. VDOT has estimated that a sound wall could cost between $500 to $1,000 per linear foot depending upon the height and location of the wall. (2) Installing sound insulation, including air conditioning, in residences that qualify. The major problem with sound insulation is the perception of inequity between neighbors. The STB has estimated that sound insulation would cost about $10,000 per structure. Negotiate Settlement with Local Government Rather than negotiate individually with each property owner, NS and CSXT have been working with the impacted communities to reach negotiated settlements with the local governments. They propose alump-sum payment to the community based on the number of STB identified structures. Sixty-three structures in 23 localities qualify for the noise abatement payment. According to a recent newspaper article, four of the localities have negotiated and 2 ~~ _,.. ~. accepted a NS financial settlement. Other localities have requested that NS negotiate directly with the property owners. FISCAL IMPACT: Based on previous negotiations, Roanoke County could receive $10,000 per structure if it chooses to negotiate a settlement. ALTERNATIVES: (1) Authorize the County Administrator to contact the property owners who meet the noise threshold to see if they wish the County to negotiate a settlement on their behalf. (2) Do not negotiate with NS and request that they negotiate with the individual property owners. (3) Authorize the County Administrator to negotiate a settlement with NS with the settlement funds being used to benefit the entire County. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve Alternative #1, that the County negotiate with NS on behalf of the property owners; or Alternative #2, that the property owners negotiate with NS themselves. Either of these options would benefit the individual property owners who are most negatively impacted by the increased railroad noise. ~~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Motion by: H. Odell Fuzzy Minnix motion Church _ x _ amended by Harry C. Nickens to approve Johnson _ x _ Alt #1 revised as follows: Authorize the McNamara_ x _ County Adm. to contact the property Minnix _ x _ owners who meet the noise threshold to Nickens _ x _ see if they wish the County to help the citizens facilitate the noise abatement caused by the rail traffic cc: File Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney '~~ HC H Cza (~' ulc [~ ' c .H IIC Uc ~~ ~ ~I~F of rnf~ oC FC f~oA ".~ O~U MU A O ~ as ~noo °z F O~ A ~ Q rnWO~E-1 I M~zUo~ Q O H r-i Ci I C R; U fs U]R ~a xE E"Ifs WP -~-i-i ~ ~~ aad ~C H (~ aC C C t, H ~ O r o c O N ~a I C ~z H c ~ ~ r O r $ ~U ~ SNOW a OOO,Y, R;NIllO ~ 160 [t H U v~r•~o Worn A ZN~n R l6M R O o R Cz, o A O o0 00 0o w O o0 0o a o0 L~ O L~ <` L~ ~ a 00 z w ~od~ a+d~ O H ~ oul co rio H 0o a e f~ ~ P J oao r r H ~ om O ~--I N ~ ~ 0 a ~ ~~ ~ O QU 1"i Ol`~ SNO ~ c ~ c ~ ' S ' 0 S w ~ ~7 r~ ~ F Q r C r C O a ~ 7 W ~ H QQQ ~ Q w d~ l ~ Ra F ~ C]NS o c~ ~ ~ ' ' a N rn rn ooN z a ~ ~ w a o o z ~ ,.~,.~ F N m w z zo O O O Q i W w PP ?? ~W~ Q E OHO EW+ NA W Qu o C w ~ WW roa ww cq z N3N Ha 0 ~7 w c i z > o ~a m w (1,'000 W 160N m 3 ao m cn a 0 x °~ w n x ~ F ~ H H 0000 ~ ~ 61160 o w 3~ ~ O ° a w a ~ ~~ H06161 O a Orlri H N II ~ H ~ ~ v u ca Q ~ ~ ~ ~ a ... p l6l6N w x o0I1)00 z w o] H a a ~ l0 ri q z O .I Ho00 x diNdl H w~~ ~~.~ ~~ H W O -IHH Q W W F O O O FFF F F [ i. r ~ oFFE ~~ O m 000 z oxa zao ~~ O 0 U O H Q a u yr io ca~a ~ . H (~ N V} N ~ moN F ~ O N 3wo O w 0 a yr w O 0 0 +HHHN6IHHH+ ~ ~ m ~ , W O I I W W N ~ O d' F z O ~ ~ I a H R C M H W F o z +r-10 + I H ~ ~ ~ I I I U ~ 00 O I I I RC d' ~ Q F O Q X l0 00 d~ di O N N I `~a zH D u O O w ~ I (~ I I a 0 r~ N I(~ IC/~ I za R C M I ~ I ~ I [x ~ 7 l0 ~ w M i M +HO +Cil I O +HHHNOIHHH+ Q z r a ~ IlI I~ ~~ ~ a, ~ ~ W o 0 . ri H z a ~ O a E-I +HHHNO~HHH + , F, Ul I I ° PU F w Ill I O i o>x F M dl ~ ~ H +r~10 + qa W P w ~ I I I W a ~ ~ ~ +,-lo + I I w x 9 1 I l6 l0 , F w M I I HQ H ~ F o C~ ~ Q I I I(~ I RC H ~ ~ 1 ~ I ~ L~ N N +HO + C7F~ ~ F' O RC 00 O I (~ I 1 xao ~ ~ ~ a ~}+ M I ~l I U] ~ dl o u u w ~ RC I ~ I (.~ (~ r-I ~ O O +HO+aa t w a ~ O ~ +HHHNOOHHH + H W W a ~~ a E O H O w U 00 ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ M N H 0610 CJ~r-It.(lODCO ~ Ca H •ri U61~MM ~' x W O -k -k -k -k -k •k •Ic •Ic •k •k -k -k -k •k is •k •K I-~r-Id1000 H ~ ~ ' Lfl E-1 L7 I I Ra Ill ~ ri H o ~ OOON~ f1' ~ a Z W x ~ ~ a z H Q U ~ ~'k Q ~ O ~ I I- I- I- ~ H 0 a a+NO~oZ E-loinoo O(aZRS ~a H f=+OOW O C-~f-4~L1+ I I I OH UOr-I61N ~ o a N r-I H O WU~WE-I cl~U~cJ~p R-Irlooo H H Qwl-~aUHH~~~oH~ w F o ~ a A OU Ra~fxWl~ZCt+Ct+C=+~x H o00o Z Z ~ Q o O~O~ir4~R+rF~C I-aW WOON~-i H Ndil6N O ~ o Ill o Ua3w~~CQUwxU I I I C7oa A;Hl6r•H z z v O1rIMM dIdIOM~F~'a'Cl~ '~ (~yH Hri ~ F H ~ ~ a F F[; r-I M~ONOOLf)riOrlO(~(~(~Wr-10 Q a '`7 a z i~•k•K**•k***-k~'k'k'k I-a ~ m vFiF 1 a;HNa; Hr-I Ul as ~i CJ ~ q x w H Qal~aH~3a ~ N a ~ ~ H C=,~3U~U OI-~E-+ ~xG4 O W ~ x I-a a~~7H acnQ~n ~ acn HowA; QNI x - w ~ r ~ p q ~ ° ~ U]WWC~R:Hfs,(s,xFCaaaaxOkC E-laa~fs~p (~,, u JD 1 a N H H H O O N 61 H W C~ F QH H ~H 0 ~U F~ oa N Z 0 U Q N Z Q U] ~ W f' Z J_ Q~ Q ^ ~ ~ Z 0 Z U W Z ~- W z~ a w ~- ~ O ~ w ~_ I ~ w U ~ N Q J ~ 1C m W 0 Q Z 3 W W ,- ~ N ~ } 0 0 N O ZZ t0~ H Z W a 0 } w Z~`w O 0 0 ~- UZ} w w H ~ ~ Z p ~ ~ Z Q ~ Qa~ 0 W ~ ~~U JUNE 19, 2001 [-~ '(7] r Z HC H C=.Ir Lf)C H c H ~~ C Uc ~iC` HaF of oa r-~ oC rl WOA a o~E '~.~ rl U MU A ~ ~ W ~~ °z F O'er A u] ~qY rnP-IO~CE-I I M~zUo~ q o H rl H T1 f~ U U F •- ~~ `~"• F WF H~ H~ W~ ~a (Ya 6 C Ill C Hr r H I~ C C C C~ r-I ~ O r O C N ~ a I C ~z H c (~ ~ r r w ox a d'O ~ ~I N fi ~d+NO ~ H~/ooa A I~yNC~O (Y IOM R o R L7 o A p o0 0o w oo w O 00 00 Q U OO F Ill ~rn rnrn h a oo °z a Ol ~M MM O H cn 1001 l0 rio0 oDOO Z z a L()d~ H /.S H C4 O Wa o a [~ >~ ~ d' Q u H d~ ~ ~~ d~ ~ ~ ~ NH ggq ~ r ~ ' W ~ w ~ ~ a F lornln z H , a~ ~ i W WW pP Q F pa; ~+ O10000 ~ O O O Q ? WW ~ ~~ m a o N N ~ ~, O F 7 «7 w [W~ ~~ W] Q £ 000 W II W O W D ~D~ QQ ~ FC O W ~' W H O w u z w w ~ o~ w w c nu ~ w W H z z m U o ~ F a c ~ a O x x Q ~ ~ c Q000 Q c 7 IOLfI F bb ~ x o w a a ~ a r rx x H~+rlLfl o a 00ri ° W q z U a u w Q a w a s as ~~ ~' u w m z u w E o a D ~ Q FC ~ C~~l~rl a rnor-I ~7 ~ ~ '~ ~ ] rI lfl ~ ~ Q ~ ~4 ~4 ~ W W ~ "I "I 'i Q N H Q o o 1 ~ r N F F F H H m 000 ~ U O a a z a N a ~ ~ o m ~ H F a o r• ~ o 0 w o o l() +HHHHHHHHNLf)HHHHHHH ~- II z ~ ~ o O . W O I I W W r• O O I I C/l I I F H 2 CQ I I W F ~ H U ~ ~ ~ I I ~ I I a A 01 I I w '~ x I I q F o Q l~ U I I E-I H o W O1 I I ~ O rI I I a l0 I I a l0 ~S z N L~ L() I I O I 1 w ~7 q ,7 r-I F I I a ~ ~ ~ ° v+ Iu~ I I k~ ~, a u a0 W N N o w F H ~+ ~ o a ~ I I z a Q I I O E-I I I ~ -{ U) I I F, M U H r I W l0 I I Oda ~' O I I j ~ I I Aa a ~a w N I I ~ ~ ~ I I ~ x a ~ a W I I F a d I I ~ F o ~ ~ ~ I I ~ r-I I I M 61 I I ~ F O ~ M N I I Huz oao o X 61 . . M rl I U) I u w 0 \ I ~ I ~ 0 0 • rl rl I (Ya I w a£ O w w i-HHHHHHHHNLf)HHHHHHH + W H w ~ [~ O ~ ~ ~ H ~ O ~ p O ul ~ H a i O l l U)IOMM O M N ~ Q r r r rl •rl UrIO1l0 O ,~ n7 w ~ w -k -k -ki~•Ki~~k•k•ki~~k•k~k*•k* r-~l1)611~ w ~ OOOWL~ Rim O Z ~ o E E 0 i ,a~ a ~ H ,'~ U) q I I I H ',x~' O o W t-ll~l-acl~rl W F C7 ~ O H a UE-+ dal-~-x q H a H Oqc~ Eel HU ooo,~oZ E-lool.n u~ fs+OW O E-IQ-i'~ I I I OH UONM ~ ~ H 3 o 0 a N r~ d arloo ~-I O WU wHq cncncn H h~wa~aU I H~~~oH~l N '~ ' ~ H o q j -IG4 G4 G4~k [~ 000 CJl T-I U(~CL ~W(3 'a uwi q 0 OI-~~ryC!)~i I-~HWMrIr~Z H LnOLfI p o n o uaw~A+quw~CU I I I olna r.~owM ~ z F U]U)U)HOF~ W O a Md~NOOLf)r1000(Ya(~(laWrlO! ry M °H' ~ ~ z q -x~~-x•~~~~-x~~~~ a cn ~ ~N ° rxr~x~r~r~ m w ~ c~ a ' C/1 E-I a aaE-I 3 q Q x W w l- ~ H r~3cnU OI~E-I Ha~ ° ~ ~ x w acne acn How~C g o w ~q ~ ~ ~ o cn OkC E-Ipq cnWf~R;I-+C~.If=IxFCWW -~ a N rl rl O O N r• W ~~ aH H aH ~O UZ ~U ?a N a _~ Z 0 H U Q N Z Q H J_ Q Z 0 U W ~ ~ H ~ W W N J Z z ~ O ~ W ~ [fl 0 W U ~ U] Q J ~ 1C m W [~] J Q Z 0 w d' Q ~ N ^ Q 0 0 N W ZZ ~OF- H Z W a a ~' w Z~`w ~~~ o~ [~ Z } W F- ~ ~ Z 0 ~ ~ Qa~ pwp ~~U JUNE 1 9, Z^^ 1 H ,:~7c Z H r H G~ c 111 C [~ C H IIC Uc ~~ ~ ~~ of op4 .-IC M G40A a o~E HU ri A ~ ~ W o~w°zF O~ A ~ Q ooaoa~U 1 N~'z,U~~ Q O H r-I H `~ I a' Q A H N ~~ A ~ Ci ~~ ~~ Lf1r C (xc H ~ C I-a AH.,c C C t1 r• ~ f~ I-a O C ~a o N aa3 a ~ I c Q~nHc Q ~ ~ H O C Q ox a 1.n0 ~ x ~~ ri ~M~o H xoNfx Ncou1 E-IrM W H O Cz.~ o IO 00 00 O u O ~ H w W C! ~ 00 00 O q w o ) ~ ~. l6 Ol0 1616 00 E + a N z M A w ~ a O 00 00 O H m OD 61 ~ I-~ O NN NN G 4 Pz w 61 61 W rl 1"I HH y H H H ~ H m a yr 00 rn a E-+a1 >~ a' s ~ ~ ~ rn qu ~ a'~ ~ ~°z~ ~ a ~ ~~ ~ w al s ~ Fq w H az QQQ ~~v i r-I w ~.,a e~ ~ ~ WH F H r ~ ~~~ ° a0 ~ z ~~ ~ ~ wa g w r x >+ ~d 10 Z w~~ O H O q W ~7 ' P a ~~ ~ ~ ~+ v1 R', 0 ~ U] H ' N z vl p ~ w ~ ~~ a q W ~ q ~ 000 M w o ' ~ ~ vt o Wm W wH p C~ . w u z w a a wa> o~ ~ q ww m m ~ ~ (Y,000 m w 1111111 z m ~ m w a ~ E+rx cn a 0 o w a ~ r ~ r ~ 0000 a ~ 010~-I U o ~ ~ H ~ F 00 x x x HO~d+ o a ri00 H ~ r, ~ u q z u q w ~ as R: ~ w ~ m ozv} rx w FCP ~ z O q a a a A A ~~ a0[ [~ NOI~-I a ae OMr-I Lf1d~e0 Q E H ~ s z o ~•, r, ~O r-I O p ~ W O rIHO q u a~ O V Lf1 H H F O O O F F O [0 000 ~ S ~ E O F F z ~ W z F u O q q z W (~v r.0 H~ ~ M ~ W ~ N a ~ N ' J W m,~m H H n1 ~zN p w 0 oww H 0 111 tHHHHNl6HHHH t ~ N z °,n ~ O • • w 0 I I PO rn n i ~--~ O I I ~ H z o o C!~ I I ~~ o 0 W I I (.~ H E, z H I r-I w F w ~ O l0 ~i I N 0 I I x A 61 E-+ N I w ri CJ~ M I Q F, O q O I I E--1 H O ~ [~ L(1 I tHlOtt x z Zau O w Ol I I I H a 0 H H I I I r-I a H ~ ~ l0 N I Q ri r-I O w N z ~ o I~ I I~ A~ F tL(1 tH~--INH tHl~ t tHrIrIH t ~, a ~ ° di I Cl~ M I X~ w ~ u Lf1 W tHHr-IL11H t I ~ . H H 1 I I O a ~ I I I z Q I I I ~ E'1 l6 l6 I E.., 0 ~ ~a ~ I ~° a H w E " L(1 I~ 1 I I [ o ~x ~ ~ ~~..77 r~ r rx 2a 1 I tHr-INH t t I Aa ~ I D '~ w ~ M L(1 I 1 1 r-I I I I ~ W ~ w OO O I I E. w ~ O H H H I I ~ F O x 5 0 l a I I I ~ H tHr-INHtN I l0 ~ N I Huz ~ H O w ~ N I 1 aao o ~ ~ a0 N I CJZ 1 o u w 0 ~ 1A,", I ~O o N r-I ~ a ~ 0 w HHHHHHMNHHHHH t t W H q p ~ "' H ~ ~ p W U ~ D p ~ a ~ F a M N H 0610 Cl~61MNl~OLn~Lf161 O ~ q ri •H UrIrIMMIOL~Lnr-i~-I L(1 t11 -k -k -k i~ ~k -k ~Ic -k -k -k ~k ~k ~k ~k -k -k -k -k aOLn r-IMOl6d' ~ w ~ w ~ ~ a ~ ~ F H ,~., a ~ Q I I I H W Q H U~+ W~-ll-~I-aU~ H c~ o H a Q H 1-al-~a~ Q ~ ~ H a OQR;H ~a'O UI•-~Nr-IO~OZ [--IOOL(lOLf1Lf10Lf10 (7 fS.~OW~ OWOE-I 'a I I I OH UO~ONd+MNM61 C!~ H ~ u z a o ff H H O ~WUE-~3W f~ cl~cnv~p a~oooo0000 w Hg w~l~nQa I H~~~ari~ H F o q ~~+U a cnR:ZCI.~G4f~•~ [-1 NOOMIOMd+00a0 C11 ' O ' ~ a w w ~ l-~A, il-~ryUI ~AIiA, iF"IWrIOHZi H r-Id'NMlOM00Nr-I ~ p o UaGaF4C7A,"~a UC7FCU WMNr-I L~61M61 N o u CJ)C!)CJIHOAy v HOMM N'cHMd+MA.',A.",A.',CJ~ •~ H Md~NHOOM~-Iri000(Y~(~(~Wr-IOI ~ ~ H a ~ F z Q -x~x~~~-x~~~x~~•~~-«~ a cn a ~ ~ H ~ ~1] W C7 ,~ aaaH~ A W ~ ~ Q 3~~ a a r~3~mU ool~H xw o ~a Hoow v ~ ~ x ~ A QHa aoH a~naoaHlx£~~n o~~c~cwr~zaa~wuwA~AACCp~ ~r~u~E-+Op L7rp~qc~l~ H ww wcnwwlxxHr Q ~ .~ xACa~a~xo+AC E-+mwappppcnr~ w ° I r v a t` O ri H O 0 N 61 H w H aH H ~H O ~U 'a N H cnr H T~'' H FWC` ~+C H IIC Uc ~~ ~~ N ~ U] H OF aofx oC w ooA OF x N v NU A O ~ aI I r-1',7 Z A C!l Q aoP.IO~U I N ~''/'Z~i U ~ ~ H H rr--I 1-~ apt ~~ a H x NN U) W W zH z a ~ U] W W (x U FC wE ~~ ~ ap Ul W ~ H Z~ a HC cf+ O ,'~~ C [~ ,ac c C c o ~ UUl o c ~Z N ~ Za I c ~x N ~ r H ,~. ~l W ~ H O C 3 ~ c ul O ~ ~~ ~ c ~~' ~ w F 0 0 00 F 0 0 0o ca u " O o Olll ~ w °z ri H HN O r-I ri r-ILC1 ~+ z a H -I -IN Z H '~ r r H ~ ww Q "' ,~ ~, w ~ E~ '~ o a ~a ~ Q u ~ ~ N d' (~ H ~ 3 '~ ~ ~/ ~] [F] fPaj u w ~Wj ~~J1, a z Y~ H ~ o .~ [al .14 A~ U ^J H ^4 W Pa H a ~-7 o zz ~ ~~ ~ Z~ a w ~ oW ~ ~ ra ~ H rF F W i-] ~ W ~ ~ ~ `~ > q q H W ~ Q £ W O WON m w S N ui yr W A u w H . ~7 U . W CQa> W W ,~l ~ 1-~ W ~ ~ V] W z v] mNm N W M Fa [ n LL W a 7. w O FC ~F W W 1-l O o0 ~ ~ 0 m a 3 ~j 1 F o ~ ~~ oDOO a n i c n 7 ~ u A w Q ~ ~ wa ~ ~ rxW~x P-' logo ~C7 t1 O W a z `~-1u~w ~ x a~ q + P4 ~ z 0 O '~H 00 a4 H ai~~ ~ p ~~~ ~~ ~ a OW r-I r-I W ° Ca ~ W3 ' ~ FEF EFF FF 00 Ga Ux G . ° O ~ H FZ m ~~ F U p Q a z II P. q ca~a ~p H qmg a m ~ F m M to '$ $ N m w 0 0 0 +HHNOOHH -}- m~z w 0 I I ~°~ O I I F O N Ill ' ~ H ~ H ~ <` N N F[, F o z 0 I I F ~ H rn + la ~ ~ ~ 1 q oHUlo a a m loQ HG4 rl a ~ H;3 +Hlll + Q F ca ~ W ~ ~, Q~ + 1 I I I L(1 ~ x H ~ ~ H N~ N ~ w N'~ 1 x 3 ~ 0 ~ I [i.1 I -FHHNOOHH+ w A cFil Q~ I X > vI °U H ~ F • '~ °z a a w a +HHNO~HH •}- F I 1 a ~ F W o r~ c~ ~ N N wF caa w d~ I I I q oHl no ~ ~, o . ~ + + ~ F 0 w as ~ p 3 Hlll r-I + I N 1 I l0 c7F~ F A r-{ to ~}1 I Ill d~ NCI N aao o u o ~ ° W . N A; 1 ~ ~ ,-I I Gq 1 w E ~" w ~'HHN00HH -}- H w W a ~~ E O ~ z W U D ~ ~ ~ ~ a N N 000 Cl)NO0o0N ~ Q ~-i •rl UrI00H ,~ .... k ~ ~~~x~x~~~~~-x~~~~~~~ I~~,~~r~ H ; ~ o ~~ ~ Z ° z 3 W Z7 ~ o a ~ H 1-~ U? E-1U W I--1~5C H E-1 L1, H I cq~-•IW ~ z o~ a U a •~ Q ~ H OQH ~ ~ H~ ~~ aOZ E-10000 ~ o N a H LTaO~ OaE-1Q.{Q.Ir~y '~ Cx,U,OH UONdiO , H O~WU WE-1 E-1v]~o p P.lrloo~-I F H aUE-IHH ~-IQOH~-1 W H q 'Zi~~~RjW1~'~-1~1E-1 O~k E-1 0000'-1 'a vwi Wn o OI-a CI~P; ~lWWWO OZi H ao~ooao O 10~-Ic~1lo ,~~ UW U'rC(~UWxUUI~ ~ I-3 x o v W HO o v Oc~)!'~ ~McMOM L~ NUl •~ Ryrl rl i -I r F W P~ ~ E M~r-IOOLf)rlOr-IOC IO OW r-IO ~aii r i r FC z ~ ~ ~-x•x~~x~~~~~~ W~ ~l U] ~ ~F g r~r-Irx ,~,~ ~ ~ t7 ~ Qal-~E-1~3rx xz~aw E-1 a Q fs-13[!~U OI-~H --+E-1 1-~ O W ,., x ~W E-1owr~ ~ 1 ~C ~CL7H acnQacn r~ W O,'75CG4G4'z+~I~WUOI-~H p~ >'1QigOp H n fs.1C!)Wf~'P.~,HfsafsaxF000fsaf~OdFC E-1PU,'~G.afS+ C~ °u a L` O r-I rl O O N dl w E-1 Q H H ~H ,.~~O H~ oa F N a ._ .'- -g w w a'~~ r;:_ ~~ i,!~ ~~ =~ - ~ ~'FW- Z W Z F- 0 ~ ~ Q ~ a ran Q z p ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~~ ~ Zo 0 -~ ~ U w O W ~ } ZU1 IU ~ p Z w ~ ~ Q ~ w ~ Z 0 w Z `~ U] Q J U] ~ m D ~ ~ Q I 0 w ~ Q ~ N ~ J O D tD J zz ~3 H Z W a 0 ~' w z~> ~ ~ W 0 L U Z wwl- ~ ~ Z O Qa~ ~ w p SOU ~. A-06260°I -3 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. L ` 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 26, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: Acceptance of Infopowering Grants for $40,620 Awarded by the Library of Virginia and Appropriation of Grant Funds to the Public Library Budget COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: We are pleased to bring this grant to you for approval. Staff is to be commended for their efforts to obtain this second library grant in the past six months. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Roanoke County Public Library has been awarded two Infopowering partnership grants by the Library of Virginia. The Infopowering program is a statewide initiative to bring readily accessible Internet access to all citizens of the Commonwealth. The grants total $40,620 and will be used in conjunction with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation grants, which were awarded and accepted in January, 2001. The Gates grants were given specifically to establish a computer instructional lab at the Vinton Branch Library and to buy computers and software for the Mt. Pleasant Branch Library. In contrast, the Infopowering funds are intended to provide either computer equipment or supporting materials and supplies to enhance Internet availability and are intended for libraries serving populations that are defined by specific demographic characteristics. Within the County system, Glenvar, Vinton, and Bent Mountain branch libraries met the requirements of the Infopowering program and were categorized as "partially eligible buildings." Based on that eligibility, the Library was awarded a grant of $30,800 to purchase eleven computers. Glenvar and Vinton will each add four Internet stations, while Bent Mountain will receive three. All the computers will be specially configured with the same software and peripherals as those which were supplied by the original Gates Foundation grants. Along with supplemental financial assistance from the Friends of the Library and the Vinton Women's Club, the second grant for $9,820 will be used to pay for construction expenses, such as wiring, telecommunication connectivity, furniture, and a security camera system. When combined, the Gates and Infopowering grants represent an additional 24 computers, a server, printers, a projector, and software for the Library system to help meet the escalating public demand for electronic services. 1 . • FISCAL IMPACT: ~-3 Acceptance and appropriation of the donated funds will require no additional expenditure by the County. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the acceptance of the Infopowering grants from the Library of Virginia and appropriation of the $40,620 to the Library's budget. Respectfully submitted, Diana L. Rosapepe Library Director Approved by, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by: H. Odell Minnix motion to Church _ x Denied () approve Johnson _ x Received () McNamara- x Referred () Minnix _ x To () Nickens _ x cc: File Diana L. Rosapepe, Director, Libraries Danial Morris, Director, Finance 2 A-062601-4 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~ -~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 26, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: Request to appropriate $197,377 State funds for housing inmates to Sheriffs Department budget to offset expenses already incurred COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: This is a routine year-end closing transaction. At the end of each year, we adjust the final payment from the state depending upon the inmate population during the year. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: During FY 2000-01, as in previous years, the inmate population at the Roanoke County Jail has remained above capacity. In addition, the average inmate population increased from 198 to 212 through the first 3 quarters of FY2001, an increase of 7% over the prior calendar year. As a result, operational costs such as food, utilities, medical costs, etc. continue to consume a substantial portion of the Jail's budget. After reviewing the Sheriffs year-to-date expenditures, ayear-end deficit of $197,377 is projected. Roanoke County is reimbursed by the state for salaries, mileage, office expenses, and for housing state prisoners. The reimbursement for state responsible inmates varies between a rate of $6 and $8/day. In addition, the City of Salem reimburses the County for housing its prisoners on a per diem basis. State reimbursement for commonwealth responsible prisoners is subject to state prisoner population, general assembly appropriations, and political factors, variables difficult to consider in revenue projections. Given this fact, revenues for these items are estimated conservatively with the intention of seeking additional appropriations from the Board of Supervisors if the inmate population increased expenses and the related reimbursements. Based on the conservative revenue estimates versus the projected revenues anticipated to be collected from the state and from the City of Salem for the Sheriff's Department for FY00-01, revenues in excess of budget for these categories should total approximately $300,000. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends an appropriation adjustment to recognize an additional $197,377 of state revenue for personnel and operations reimbursement and increasing r~ i the Care and Confinement budget within the Sheriffs department by $197,377 to cover increased operational costs of the jail caused by increased inmate population, staffing requirements, and capital reimbursements. Respectfully submitted, W. Brent Robertson Budget Director Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens motion to Church _ x _ Denied () improve Johnson - x - Received () McNamara- x Referred () Minnix _ x _ To () Nickens - x Approved by, ~~~~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs cc: File W. Brent Robertson, Director, Budget Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff Danial Morris, Director, Finance 2 ~• A-062601-5 ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER ~ S AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 26, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: Request for acceptance of $534,538 Hazard Mitigation Grant for Carvin Creek, Phase II Project COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: This is outstanding. George Simpson and Arnold Covey have done it again. This is the second grant to remove buildings from our most affected flood plain in the past two years. If the Board approves this grant, we will have put in more than $1,300,000 info flood reduction and returned the affected land to beautiful greenways. Recommend approval. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Emergency Management has notified us of the approval of our grant application to fund the acquisition of flood-prone homes in the Sun Valley/Palm Valley area of Roanoke County. Listed below is a summary and costs for this project. Project Summary: As a result of the Roanoke Valley Regional Stormwater Management Plan, the Sun Valley/Palm Valley community was identified as having the largest concentration of homes in the County with flooding depths of 3 feet or greater. Twenty-three homes in this area were identified in the Regional Stormwater Management Plan as candidates for acquisition based on severity of flooding. The five homes selected were based on a ranking within the floodway and the flooding depths. The grant is awarded by FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) and is administered by the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Emergency Management. A summary of the proposed costs for this project is outlined below. Hazard Mitigation Grant Project, Carvin Creek, Phase I, was completed last year and removed eight homes from the 100 yr. flood plain at a cost of $750,000. Phase II is a continuation of this effort to acquire flood prone properties where no other feasible solutions have been found. The estimated cost of Phase II is $550,000. 1 ~~ Summary of Costs: Federal Share Administrative Costs (to locality) State Share (VADEM) County Share TOTAL PROJECT COST $412,529.00 75.0% 12,001.00 2.2% 110,008.00 20% 15,462.00 2.8% $550,000.00 100% The 1992 bond referendum included $210,000 for projects identified from the Regional Stormwater Management Plan and is available for Roanoke County's share of this project. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACTS: Alternative 1. Accept the grant and authorize staff to match with funds and in- kind labor from the Department of Community Development. Alternative 2. Decline acceptance of the grant. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative 1. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: George W. Simpson, III, P.E., Assistant Director Elmer C. Hodge Department of Community Development County Administrator ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson motion to Church _ x Denied () approve Johnson _ x _ Received () McNamara- x Referred () Minnix _ x To () Nickens _ x _ cc: File George W. Simpson, Assistant Director, Community Development Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Danial Morris, Director, Finance 2 „~--- ~ ~ .~~~ ~ ~:~ ~~~~ :: p d ~f ..~ ~~ ... .~f...,, ~. ~j 5352 °~f~ .' ~~~/ ~0r 5346 .~ ''~'P. C t ~ 534 ~f 53 ~9~ 0 Roanoke County Department of Community Development County of Roanoke Hazard Mitigation Project Carvin Creek Phase II Scale: 1"=100' G-~ d/ / 'a Dr eT~i 1 e y 6~ ti~ 4~ O ~I 0 O ~/ ~r ~ v lie ~~ At,~ O `0 QC ~a O °, ~O o, 0 i~~ o ' ~ ~, r Roanoke County Department of Community Development ~,""`' County of Roanoke Hazard Mitigation Project Carvin Creek Phase I Complete Scale: 1 "=100' 4 ti ACTION NO. ITEM NO.~~- ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 26, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: Requests for Public Hearing and First Reading for Rezoning Ordinances; Consent Agenda COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Recommend approval BACKGROUND: The first reading on these ordinances is accomplished by adoption of these ordinances in the manner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions, rather approval satisfies the procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public hearing and second reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public hearing on these ordinances is scheduled for July 24, 2001 The titles of these ordinances are as follows: 1) The petition of the American Tower Corporation to obtain a Special Use Permit to construct a broadcast tower on 34.83 acres located on the Bent Mountain Substation, 8920 Willett Lane, Windsor Hills Magisterial District 2) The petition of Nathaniel C. Haile to obtain a Special Use Permit to develop a golf course on 364 acres located on 3608 Pitzer Road, SE, Vinton Magisterial District. 3) The petition of Paychecks Plus to obtain a Special Use Permit and Rezoning from C1-C to C1-C to construct two offices on the back of the existing building and expand the parking lot on .5 acres located at 3716 Colonial Avenue, Cave Spring Magisterial District. 4) The petition of Craw-Mart, Inc. to obtain a Special Use Permit for a new convenience store and gasoline station on .873 acres located at 5944 Catawba Valley Drive, Catawba Magisterial District. • ~.. ~~ 5) The petition of Caldwell White Associates to obtain a Special Use Permit to construct a cluster subdivision on 14.25 acres located between Merriman Road and Crystal Creek Drive and 600' west of Cartwright Drive, Cave Springs Magisterial District. 6) The petition of Play It Again Sports to obtain a Special Use Permit for a retail store on .601 acres located at 4347 Valley Avenue, Cave Spring Magisterial District. MAPS ARE ATTACHED; MORE DETAILED INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE IN THE CLERK'S OFFICE. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: (1) That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of these rezoning ordinances for the purpose of scheduling the second reading and public hearing for July 24, 2001. (2) That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth as Items 1_6, and that the Clerk is authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action. Respectfully submitted, ~'`~`~1 ` o~~y~,c Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Action Motion by . Church Johnson McNamara Minnix Nickens No Yes Abs a ~_ 1 of Roanoke Count For Staff Use Only y • Community Development Planning & Zoning Date received: 3~Z3 b ! R ~eivcd by: 5204 Bernard Drive P O Box 29800 Application fee: yp °° b+2• PC ZA date: ac . "~ • 3~- ~= f Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 772-2108 placards issued: BOS date: ~ ' Z y -~ Case Number a p .. 7 ~ Z- 6 6~ . .. ,., - ,.: ,, ;; - ALL APPLICANTS .. :.. ; ::. Check type of application filed (check ali that apply) O Rezoning X Special Use O Variance Applicants name/address w/zip American Tower Corp. 128 Mill Lane Salem, VA 24153 Owner's name/address w/zip AEP: Conta~tt: Jack Kirby 40 Franklin Road Roanoke, VA 24011 Property Location Bent Mountain Substation - 8920 Willett Lane Phone: (540 378-4061 (540)378-406 Fax No. Phone (540) 985-2884 Fax No Magisterial District: Community Planning area: Tax Map No .: 10 3 -1- 5 Existing Zoning: AG- 3 Size of parcel(s)- Acres- 7 5 ~' x 7 5' 3 '~ • g/ (Existing Land Use: E x ii s t i n g e l e c t r i c s ub s t a~ i o n - ;:; REZONING.AIVD SPECIA.~ USE PERMIT APPLICANTS (R/S) .. r---=-----1 Proposed Zoning: AG-3 Special Use Permit Request Proposed Land Use: E l e c t r i c S u b s t a t i o n Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? yes ~ No O IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes f! No O IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes O No O Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF 'T`HESE ITEMS ARE NIISSING OR INCOMPLETE. R/S V R/S V R/S V Consultation 8 1/2" x 11" concept plan Application fee Application Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable Justification Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the roe or the owner's.agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the lolowledge and consent of the owner. ~ •~\ ~'}~ ~~ /~ A ~ ~----• ~ _ Signature US'i'TFICATION ~'OR REZQNIl`rG OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST ' ::: . ~-- ant Amerncan Tower Cor oration The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to deternune the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. In the Zoning Ordinance 30-3 purpose #4-A communication tower at the proposed site will greatly improve mobile phone service of the221 corridors from Cave Spring Corners area continuing up Bent Mtm. And reaching the Roanoke County line thus assisting with 911 calls using a mobile phone. American Tower proposes one tower on Bent Mtm. thus working with the county in achieving their goal in the reduction in the number of towers in the county. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County nunity Plan. In keeping with the Community Plan to protect our mountainsides and ridge tops, American Tower has proposed ONE tower in an existing AEP substation, which will hold several carriers and reducing the need for several towers on the hillside. The existing access road will be used thereby eliminating the need for cutting up the hillside with any additional roads resulting in erosion, siltation of streams and the loss of scenic quality. Please descnbe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. The proposed communication site at the Bent Mtm. AEP substation should have little impact on the property itself, since the tower will be located adjacent to the existing Power structure. The adjoining property is farmland and the nearest residence is 958' To the proposed tower. There will be no impacts on public services and facilities, including water/ sewer, roads, schools, parks/ recreation and fire rescue ~~ M/1=RICAN TOW.R STATEMENT OF INTENT American Tower Corporation, hereby request approval of its application to construct, maintain, and manage a multiple user wireless communication facility at the property owned by Appalachian Power Company dba/ American Electric Power Company located at 8920 Willett Lane, Roanoke, VA 24018. Introduction American Tower Corporation is the nation's premier, fully integrated tower development company. It combines the ownership and/or management of more than 13,000 towers in 38 states with the ability to provide build-to-suit networks, professional services, and facility management services. Over the past eight years, American Tower has acquired, for carriers, more than 11,000 sites in 48 states. This includes sites for virtually every wireless provider in the country. Proposal •- American Tower Management Inc entered into a sublicense agreement as of the 18th day of October 2000 with AEP Communications, LLC. The terms of the co-development agreement between parties hereby leases a portion of the land containing a 75' x 75' area. The proposed wireless communication facility will be comprised of a fenced equipment compound located within the lease area containing a monopole tower structure not to exceed 180' and the necessary transmitting/receiving equipment. The facility will be fenced and locked. The facility will be unmanned (visited on an average of once per month for routine maintenance purposes), will not be lit (except as required by FAA regulations), and will not emit noise or glare. American Tower will lease all available antenna space on the structure to wireless providers, as well as the necessary ground space area to accommodate their respective necessary equipment. Site Selection/Design American Tower has assisted virtually every wireless provider in the country with its infrastructure development and is acutely aware of the associated requirements. The process of developing these systems is to cellular development in that the Basic Trading Area ("BTA") regions are subdivided into small geographic sections or "cells". Each cell site holds the equipment that provides the air interface to the subscriber units and must be precisely located relative to other "cells" creating a communication grid system. This ;' system must reflect the topography and traffic (user population and building density) of AMERICAN TOWER CORPORATION • 128 MILL LANE, SALEM, VIRGINIA 24153 s 540/378-4061 • FAX 540/378-4062 /Y1A=RICAN TOW.R the "cells" as well as the radius of the radius of the respective antenna's reliable transmission area. A freestanding structure will be utilized to provide the necessary height, this accommodating at least (4) carriers. The proposed facility will be located adjacent to the AEP sub-station and will cause minimal visual impact to neighboring properties. Information Required And Factors Considered In Granting Special Use Permit See attached checklist. In conclusion, American Tower Corporation, respectfully request approval of this application. If there are any questions concerning this application, please contact me at (540) 378-4061 ext.119 Sincerely, • ~ John S. Walter Zoning Manager American Tower Corporation J AMERICAN TOWER CORPORATION ~ 128 MILL LANE, SALEM, VIRGINIA 24153 ~ 540/378-4061 ,FAX 540/378-4062 ~'ROADCAST ~'OWER PREAPPLICATION CONSULTATION CHECKLIST .Applicant Name: ~y~zt ;~U~ -["r~~,.•¢1~" Date: jl~~~ Consultant Staff Member: BROADCASTING TOWERS AND ASSOCIATED'ANTENNAPERMITTED'BY RIGHT: • New and replacement broadcasting towers and associated antenna not exceeding thirty (30) feet in height and located within any commercial or industrial zoning district_provided: ~. a) fhe proposed tower is a monopole'type design; b)=the general area of the proposed tower is currently served by:above ground utilities including electric. power and telephone poles; and c all other use and deli n standards for the construction of the' brnadcastin tower and associated ;... ) g g facilities are mefi • ~nfennas may be installed on`any existing structure within the County providetl aid aritenria does hot meet the 'definition of a broadcasting tower, does not-increase the ieight df'the existing structure,:morethan ten (10) feet, .and does not result in the structure and antenna exceeding the maximum structure height for`that zoning .district. • Ternporary towers erected for a period not to exceed twenty-one days. THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION SHALL BE REQUIRED AS PART OF THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR BROADCAST TOWER IN ADDITION TO STANDARD APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE FILL • OUT COMPLETELY, EVEN IF INFORMATION IS ALSO INCLUDED ON OTHER SUBMITTED DOCUMENTS. Propcsed site qualities Utilities that are currently present on site: 0 Utilities required that are not currently present on site: -Expected route of linkage: N~~e. Estimated noise level in decibels: ~Q~_ Broadcast Towe Structure Type: Monopole ^ Lattice Tower ^ Guyed Tower ^ Stealth Design (description) ^ other (description) Width dimensions: base top Proposed height of tower excluding antenna: ~ `3~ { with antenna: Existing height of surrounding tree canopy and/or buildings: Construction material and finish of tower. Specific tower location Material: ~.~~~ Finish: ~,tr~ Longitude: "Latitude: Ground elevation in mean sea level of the proposed tower site: 2 ~ ~ "~ -ower has structural ability to accommodate: ^ One ^ Two ~~ Y , Three other providers. T e s of Antenna or Other Devices Attached To Tower ^ Omni-Directional Antenna Directional Panel ^ Parabolic Antenna ^ Whip Antenna ^ Other (description} Material and finish of the proposed antenna(s). Dimensions of Antenna(s) -height /width /depth MAtP.rIA~' ~ Finish• ~ ' ~_/ ,e following information must be submitted separately in either a written or mapped format. Information on how the proposed site relates to the applicant's existing communication system, including ( number of other sites within the Roanoke Valley, and the location of the antenna at each site. ~/ A map designating the specific coverage area(s) of the proposed height . Additional heights may be requested from staff during review. Include names of roads, a scale and label all surrounding towers as existing or proposed along with their height (feet above sea level). ~A list, with a map, of a!I of the alternative sites considered or evaluated to serve the area of this proposed tower, including other existing tower sites in the vicinity. This should include any co-locations considered ~j and the specific technical, legal or other reasons the other site(s) were rejected. Where owners would not lease, please include a signed letter. by the owner stating he would not lease. L°.I`l~ ~~rj,GlriGi'~'.Gh t3~ S,~ SQ.,~~:.) t`,}~t-} Provide conceptual site plan drawn to scale, depicting the location of support structures, equipment enclosures, landscaped areas, fences, lighting, access, limits of disturbed land, average slope of the site, ownership and use of adjoining properties, etc. Provide accurate, to scale, photographic simulations showing the relationship of the proposed broadcast tower and associated antenna to the surroundings. Photographic simulations should include the relationships of any new or modified road or utility corridors necessary to serve the proposed broadcast ~~ tower site. Provide a computerized terrain analysis showing the visibility of the proposed broadcast tower and -'~ antenna at the requested height and location. If new or modified road, access or utility corridors are proposed, the terrain analysis shall also show the visibility of these new or modified features. Additional heights may be requested from staff during review. Provide detail sheet for broadcast tower structure. LJ Provide an accurate description and photograph of the proposed tower structure, including antenna. (~ Provide detail sheet of any antenna or devices attached to tower including electrical and mechanical 1~! specifications for antenna systems. Notes ~~~~~~.~~or~ ~or ~v~el pro~:~~; h,o~"c~ S~sv«e ~~~,:~,~~; ,! 1~ ~~f~~~v`r. S ~ ~QJ d- C~v'e,t'~99 c~ ~rr.c~~ CA `,~1~ t~,o~' c.~~ ~~L`11- '~~ I hereby certify that: • .All required submittal's to the FAA, as required by Zoning Ordinance Section 30-87-2D.6, have been submitted. ~~~. LZ~~.o:~~ • A required on-site ba/loon or comparable test will be performed on fhe dates of for the Planning Commission public hearing scheduled for ~ ~, ~ v ~ ~ ,and on the dates of ~ .~. Lai for the Board of Supervisors public hearing scheduled for . Weather permrtf~ng tests should remain up the entire day. Engineer should certify height. ~. 1, the applicant, shall be responsible for al! fees associated with the filing of fhe applicafion, including fhe reasonable cost of any independent analysis deemed necessary by the County to v e need . r fhe new broa Ica t tower. Signature: ~" - `° Date: i/~~~C3 • Applicants Wayne: American Tower Corp. ` ROANOKE COUNTY Zoning; Special Uae DEPARTMENT OF Proposed Zoning: AC-3 (Special Use COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Permit Request) Tam Map No. 103.00-1-5 ~ O 5 t ~ ~ O ~~ Op ~ySR ~ ta1 R ~s~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ I I I I ~ ~ ~ a ~ ' ~ ~~ ..~ _ o ~ ~ ~ y gqy yp ~€d~~ aa e : i i $ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d~ 5~ ,y O Z w'j ~ M` (} U ~ J q q < ;~~ ~' US ~ z ~~ € 8 ~ ~ ~gg! ~~ a ~~ ~o ~ am I ~ p !~1 ~> k ~ z ~ ~ ~ 6~ i ~ ~ ~ R ~ a (~ 1 i ~ [ x ~ R ~~~t~ ~ R~ $ ~ ` °o of 8n aLL ~ $ &y 0 L ~L ~ > ~ ~ ~ F r ~~itikd~~a ~~@ ~ = ~ ~~Q m d ~ W 1 ``\ ``\ ~h wm / 1 g~' \ f/ `' \ zrc ' \ ~o ~ Z tJ ~+\ b /+ ~o ~;~ +\ °~ ~aa /, .~ ~3 + /+/ } ~~ z~' E~ w $ W v! ZS tl °. ~~o V~7 w ~ F ;~W ~.l~a WY N N ~~ G ~~ /// o ~ O ~~ a g P rvO ~ xiS _ O /~ ~ o ~2 ~gg p YO_ wfo~lqiy~ ~ ~ ~~ /~~~~Liw ~~ ww a~Zi ~Y ~^/ `p ~~~' ~p / ~ U zi ow ~~ / / s,w t i `~~~ rco 0 C :-;. i 3 .. ` y + /// ~ tR,.S N V / i '_ gyp, Z ` ` ` ~ ~ ~ ~ p ``` ~`~`\ ~ ~ ~ U ~\+ & ~ I 1 +~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ + ~ ~ -:,, ~ 1 ~~ ~ + 1 / / ~ ".. Q \ ! I ~ ~ ,' W ~ z \ / ~ ~' ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ I , / / • \ \ ~ / / / ` \ ` ~ \ ~ \ \ \ ~ \ \ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ i I o a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~ p ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ U K~ Z~~~ V I ~ / ~ z I I I I 1 ~ 1 ' ~ ~ ~ W I ~ S I ~~ ~ ~~~~~ a~, I ~ ' I i 1 / ~ I Sd I Irow Kea o0/BO/tl aw'!-H\b"N°z\e.o!~.rory 19\53115 d3~W3ro! 3zOMrvo~\53IIS lvntlOf M3tlVaro1 eez!~e~~n\~3 ~eM e[1 - - _. ~ ~a E E E f diwodN',~wnoo ~onrvod ~ ~ ~ r ~ i~ 0 ~ 1 999 €€€ t; ~ ~N ~ ~ € 'dFJO~ Fi3M01 NV~Ia3WV ~ o ~ a o ~ ~ o O L L ~ ~e ~ 88 ~ '` ~ 7 ~~ ~ LBOdj-dA ' ' o O _ ~ §9 ~~ A#~~~ ~ p ~5 ~ db W SIS.I~b NtJa3HSM31/~ o g ~ a ~ ~ _ '- o¢ a E~.c~ R y .~ S .cf6 ~f i ~ e_ 3 ;~~€ '' ass i!o zs 3d s4 N_ .~: gg ~ 3~P 'S7 '~^gE `~ S9 c$ C yye€ i~ a 99 ~ ~ ;Rs ~£ i i6 ' gg E - y 8 6 :~ ? =f~ 6'gE_ E~ 8= os t N ° =~~4~s ~~ ~$ 5 ~~~ ~~ \p~ ~ `ens , ~\ ° (l ~~ i ~ ~ l~I ill ~J ~ `. rf , lii . ~~ ~ f s o ~, O, ~~' 666r~ ~ ~f~_~ '~ ~~ ~~'. ti 1~ ~ ~ ~, t ~ J ~' (r~~, ~~~ ~ e ~~{/lt ,, ~~w~~" ~~ ~~t C. ~ K~.w %~a (~(. ~/ .i~,~. f, ..oi v 4 O 1 • ~~~ ' -- -T -- -- f ' ~ ' I I ~ I i ~ I I 1 ~ 1 • 1 1 I I 1 ~~ I ``~~ I ~ ~ ` I ``~ I i I I .. ~ ~ LEGEND - x- x-x -x-CHAIN LINK FENCE - PROPERTY LINE • - - LEl~SE AREA -OHi--OHi NEW OVERHEAD TELCO --uQI/t1CP--UOT/110P-NEW UNDERGROUND TELCO/POWER --- - ! ~~! ~' -- -- ucF -- (FUTURE) UNDERGROUND POWER -- - u~~, - - ucr (FUTURE) UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE EXISITING OVERHEAD POWER LINES ~q °~ ~ EXISITING ~ ELECTRIC .o TOWER TRUE NORTH 0 20' 40' 80' 120' SCALE: 1"=40' INGRESS/EGRESS de UTILITY EASEMENT F~1 ~w c =_R ~ /V~n ~ w / ~ . vim-=R OOR 3959 ELECTRIC ROPD, SUITE 230 ROANOKE, VA 24014 TEL: (540) 776-5400 FAX: (540) 776-0707 THESE ORAMIGS RO/OR THE ACCOYPNIYIND SPEtlFlCA1KNi AS INSIRUNENTS OF SERNCE, ARE THE ExCW51VE vRaPEECty a MIfRICAN TOWER coRaoRMxrl MID THEIR USE Ma alaucMloH SHML eE RLTIRICIFD TD THE aRXxu~ s1E fWR WMa TifY ARE aRErxIED. REUSE. REaRODIx,'nan aR Astx•ATaH Br Mrr wET1IOO, w rHatE aR M rMtr, s aaDHleRm ExcErt 8Y WWIfiFN ffsAS9oII FRDY MERCMI towER cDRFORAtxw tRU: To THESE f'IANS AHD/OR sPECIFIGTIOHS SHML REwwH wRH MrEl+lran town CORPORATKIN wRF10Uf EhiEAl01CE IND wsuK CDNVCf 1mH THEN SHALL CONSiRUIE FWWN FADE EVOENCE of ASCEPTMICE aF THESE RESIRICt10I6. ,` GEY ENGINEERING CO1[PANY 2500 WILCREST SUITE 100 Houston, Texas 77042-2752 Phone (713) 339-1550 Fax (713) 339-9993 REVISION ra. ocxWpElon m oATe o wwr+c a 11 oe o0 A 20IMIG R'ME1P K 10 00 SRE NUMBER: VA-FA087 SrrE NAME: BENT MOUNTAIN sRE ADDRESS: 8920 WILD=Tf LANE ROANOKE, V !~..~ v O ~~ ,. ,.~E:y,. Sf~~ ~~ ortAWM s>': GEICIQD !Y: COO aac oww~t 1o/1e/oo O61E JO! ND: 640198 SiElT 7RlE SITE PLAN SEEEI NU16OE IIlV. / A-1 0 ~a ~~ F ~~. ~, rt`i 118100 • • • /' • F4NILIq . MCI„LCIf • vlawma • •urviwn>t 1m~ ee.Fe..b cwa. no.nok., vbMib a~ot~ Plpn~: MO/1TiMp FAX:6~0/)TLlplp 501 Br~tdN.ay Fkba Bulb 100 WdimOrld. VFOIM Y3238 PIWeN' BOS/19~-05'!1 FA%: 5W/ID44835 110351~kwkl0~ FYkwry 9ulb 1 M4n0, NyYY~ Y3005 Mgrb: 80{rEfiO-PBl9 FAK 80t~550-ROS] LL Q ~ a ~ a (A O z ~ U c~ } w ~n ~ ~ aQ o ~ z O~ U a _ ~ z w a Q ~ _W DRAWN BY: HW DESIGNED BY: CHECKED BY: JCG DATE: DEC. 21, 2000 REVISIONS: SCALE: 2000 SHEET N0. 1 OF 1 JOB N0. R0000336 FROM HAILE_LANDSCAPE_DESIGN ~!-'!~M FAX N0. 540 951-4877 May. 26 2001 03:12Ph1 P2 ._.......~. ...Inn>m~---.~--__...a.... _.. .. Counnrv'of Roano~ Community Develo4menc P ~ zoning 5204 BcrAard Drive P O Box 29800 Rcaaaoke, VA 2401 &-0798 (540) 772-2068 ~'AX {~) %'2-2148 Flay. 2~ ~~f:l fk : olrr~ rs ,~ ~/ / ~' ~6... Data re:civea: SI Zq y. 161 ~~~ ~ o ~a ~DD3:~on ri.a.~ 'y'a, oa ~za. ante: /g/o~ ' y>s HOS dace: • y v , ~ ~-L`7~v~ Case ?.rumba o~ ~ ' 7~ ~ p ~ M. & ~ _,y~~;~•,~~„-ly,xrt„r~,J'~fsy~,>~~'p"~'^ri.~S`d~~f del '~`~i~rsr• ~zn`r'',+ x ~y. ~:~, cZa''~ JF 'ti Gr. 4 .~ . C!(~ .. .. ~rP••:f 'Ciµ4p~~Y, } fi (~j., ~^\.Cl'~~. ~ ,11t•J.. ~ W.. ~ NII~h~ 11~~3•~~C~'4~.~,. ~' fn'V" `~tvJ~ 4~ I I t~ ~ ~~ ~'-{4' . fiLltF~.`!' .i.Jj~".`"~~~.,~ ~~ c^~,r.., 'y(.•. FN': ,.. ,,.;; ~"~.'.~~.~. /'~ -b ~a ~~ I , ,, : ,- , ~ tr lle~i~ of spy&:,asion fuel (~ec~ ~ zt' t]:at aF~Y) , u Rezoning A~' t Baal Y.,sc [3 Vazieace Arplicauts nose/address w:z~s ~~ ~ ~ C' R i`EP, ~~. ~if~(~ ~ ~ ~ ~~-~ ~~'~" ~ S Oa+ner's n3~xe/aci~ess x/zi~ ~{~y'~°-~~ ~-~ ~~i'~~" ~ ~ ~ '! P;coue; ~~}' ~l.QO ~Ca 3CoE'!~5 'rC ~7~0~ ~~ ~-fll- ~ ~ 9k ' ~ _ _ yL ~ Orwt I . C2"~p- Irax AFo. prop esty I.ocalioa 1 ' tczi,al Distract: Vi ~r~ ~ - F' 3.S~c ~o < k ~ . t~.si- ~~ CQmmrrnxty ~13t1A:2lg EL*'e8: ~'~"C o!.! ~'~lt'~~.1'a.~..a~- q Tz,L N13p PFo. ; '~ f - v ~ ~" ~ " i E. Zaain r4 ~. ~€ S~ Size of nrcel(s}: Acres; z`17• ~ ~ Existing I.aad Use; r~ ~ ~ (~t,,.e, 'NbrY a~~~ ~M J ~ '~ .: ~ \ I-. i~,Ry:._l V~rM /•~]:\~.4.1~~n'n '`,~ Y~[ Y!~ ..1i ,i M1R1. ~. k~PC i W Y\ 1~ y~ J •i~,l~7d..:' _ 4.. I~.y. 5%.Pfc.^w'~ `f•~.l'+~ ~~T~V _M1 h Ct.1"i• 1~ ~~ljt a ~,~/ K.'~ A'~, ~~,1~k~~~ G 1~' ~>~N"N'.4~~5~. 37 P= ' hM~~J'Jx~y R~"`.f?Ivl "y ~ ~ '1 .v ~ `J St ' N R ~ ' J _ ~ ~ W ~. t': `~/1 t 1GU1 ~" ...~+~ :!e~"~ry }~ 1~. ~...`~'.3.~~C-`~~~d~`:~~+ ~ ~~~' Us ~. ~Yc~- ~)'" 5 / ' r .Pzoposad Zonis: ,4 ~- / ~.{ / ~ ~. Dot4 ~!~arc~! m~i' the m~TM-*m•+~ 7a: axes, wiCth, and fson:2ga requisemeaY~ of t5e z~aquestcc diii~¢iot? I Y~ 3~ ?~io O IF?ti0, ?~. V.ARLA,~CE 7S R~QT~~RID' 1C]RST. I , ' Doers $:e parcel asest £^~ cacffiia ix~r tbo '-r4u~ Us¢ T~+c? Yes ~ \•o ~ IF NC>, A YARIkNCS IS &EQ~D 1~R.ST IP:e'iontslg ze~est, are cand+rioa3s be3~g pso~lered with th2s request? Yes 4 No 3 r ,a a,_. o~•~~.:.y.~,~•. _y~. ~5.: si t ~u>7[wl~7e-- i+^~;rlat:~. '~°, r; ~M, . ~ ~ ~... Itc-~. ~.:. `tiy '~~ r•Y .,~;~'+~„n.3~.~.,3... Rw-~a:. °7~"~-~ ~~' ,~~ ,~q,"yr ~~~~.h?,* '~, ATj?YI~.C~:~~.~'.._.^.~~i ) 2a~P~~ .} ~N>'t-1r~,1t ~~.it~te tT a4 j t .S .~•. "F.:~::~ `~~aGSYi'~=i~'4d xJM _ t •4Ta,,y\.3~.Ih't, ~nj'Ya:-A:-~•'°"'FA r n' .v /~ ~ r.. :37 d~ ' ` 1 ~ y~ .r, Zia 1`r.~ta.7.<P ,-~ 1~5`f {Q:Gr.,. ?5+.'~ 9_~ ^~'~:~. - ii~~.~5.. ~na;~'w>.»- .iF':11r"~w2t~~T'~!V{^ r-~t' ' ` Var~'~tc.e~ef `Yectiaa(s) of the Ro~toke County Zoning Q:diuarce in. order t0: I ' i - ' Is the appl:catioa com~Ie:e't Pleaoc ell i enclosed. A,~1~CATiON w~.L NOT BE ACCET'ZTD g' ANY' 07E TkIESE 'ri'RMC ARE MTSSXNC` OR ]'NCOMYL~'TE. i Cansultsaor, 8 12' z 11' conceptpIw + ~ Applie3tioafee _ , Appiir3t:cra Meta sad bo¢n3s desa~ptian tN Ptnt:2xs, if a?pL.xhie 7nsti'6ts.'ica ' Warr zs',d r,`w-r sppticstian Ad}oirri~ pcapccty oWDOC'S i lie-efly crrdfy that I :m cthsr t%~ owa~ c~f'the gwges~• oc ti>; ow;sei s ag~ts or conm~t p snd an: tvM t1~ s~o~eezad ceastra of the owner. L ~~~. '"'~ Applicant ~~r~~ ~~-C~h ~ h ~ h.. V The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the app)plicable zoning district classifi11cation in the Zoning Ordinance. 1 ~' ~~, -~NP.~ ~~'~P.~ ;'s Gd,jrerGta[ ~ort.~c.~ -~c7 ~c~f~lUT~ ~)rt l~~ir+~e 1.1, ~~m~ J ~-6' f r' a~r~ jc~~ ~~~ i,~~rc~t~~~ ~'1Cn ~`i ~!n c'r~~~cc~f~ ~n v~ ~e n ~ ~ v~ t? r'~~ d 3I ~',: ~i CO3~a'i 4?'T' y Y1, ~ }~ n O ~ (,^'1'Y l t~~/°c°~52°0-'1 ~S Q~ /1 ~ ~°O~ z c%>/' T'1 '' -~ ~~ °~ 1/~, -~~ r~~>^c~ Q.. ar~~~ ~~ ~ ~rr3serv~ ~' ~'hl~ ~~~>7 ~ rte, ~ ~i'c~~vlra~)~o~r~*~rt-~ /t~~~ tv/+~'!t~ any i)'`~r~~cr'"~ ~ ~~/ s~/'e~.~ l~' r~v~ off' /~~rnes. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. J / / j > J/ J ~ /'.~+^ : 7 R/ C+ /~~G O U /~~',/ /.S Y[i -"y' reo.~l.~,!/ ST>,~ ~ r Y h P~ C I ~ ~ / 1 ,~// 1 / i`°+G);^lC~i p T"~~d' ~ ~~[ L~G: T t"~ ~QE.~~ / n ~.+C/-U / /~'O_/~ rYl ~ ~Q~L`J+71'7'Y~ i /~ ~~+ /G3,'!(JG ,.S .4. / r"P1(~tdy ~{ T' ~/) 1~ ~1 a ~4Dz ~,~+mr.~-~~ ~ ~'+ C7 ~J cam. r P s T~ rs ~nd w ~rP~S~rv~ ~t.S c^ P/1 s GP , !%~e`s r,s ~ rt~~(~+Lu/Y ~t7rrv a%'-~~ /'+ I ~~O f .~C°i ~ GQr S'r~fr~9 ~ -~h ~°~l ~t~ Gr"p '~'C~ °~ J C° /'~f'.~,~i ~-C~ Z~i~ ty S *"r~yM '~i~E- v ~ Tfi~~.'r'~lto'.G[, ~/7t~L?c, l1/ Gt~'si Y'1 ';'lC~ ~:C~J'as''f'r'"U~~)C)I'1 -~/tE: t1/-t4"G~e~rS~ cc^,h^rr,rrna'~ Cat/'! ~~n~~,~'~a .i~S c~^;`(~rnc~l c~.~rcdc~~.r'~+~s~/'GS ff - I ~) > q~,~ .~ ~uJ rearm w/~~'~~ ~,^©vrvl,'~r -~~P.. ,~~'tr.~!~~~ cc;mn~vr,'~ ~;~h ~~~ ~.~e.~s~ Please describe the impact{s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding azea, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, pazks/recr~at~on a/nd fire.and rescue. _ _1 99 11 P~~`' ~ ~/!~ rt~P~~ iS ~C )i'SC~d~"~C~1Y~-7"~% a. ~artLet~t~, O/,E'~/+L~ w,~-'Y~1 GL~f?QC~S)n ~°'"°k'~'°'r' i'~~ Ro~'~oi.~r~~ ~vrl~ r"~cF?a~~,. a~~rO~> P.~~,~~' rr l~c~G~~ ~ozy,cXS' r~eG~r`,. ~%'!~ V~~n,~ s On t~,v. cc~rr~~Pi'~~ ~v~'fI u~~r ~ ~ fr~S ~o~:r a~er~y, 7i~i~scp ~o~~~' ' Sec r~ ~f, ~ ~o~' ~eaz~rs~~ vv; l~ ~a,r~ ra ~_ .3"~' l cv>'<~ Vie. /~, ~'~~ -r. a,~ ~ ~rf' ~j // _ _/ ~/` ~C~ / "~ s G rvcz~B ~ ~O Gi,Oc~cr~ ~~ `r~r ~~° rGZG~• /~i' p"Lv,>`~ ~i2lt/e°.,; ~C.L~' ~n71 ~,lC ~~ G~C~~ ct.n'?d~,~ na~ri~T tv; 11 /+-ac./'~CtSC' ~ ~ ~~ r~ ~~ ~~' ~r\J~°r~,~'' o~/'~' ~atr,~~c~, ~/~~~~r-,~s. ~.~'1~~i~cre~~~` t~., ~ ~~e, !`er~;~vc~-1~ ~o~ ~.a~~~~~-~'~m '~~.~~sj'~~. ~// ~~.~~ ~ ~ yv;%~ ,~c~.. v+~~tr~ ar`c 4.5/22%41 24:27 F:~I KINKO' S X1042 F ~ ~f'tt~iZ~r SOLIDS ~'wo major sources of Nitrogen are organic (slow release} and Inorganic {quick release). ni • 8ulids a working soil structure. + i=~remely safe sources of nutrients - meals, composts, manure. • i3roken down slowly in the topsail. • More than 6t)~6 of treacbnent~ use organic sources. • One application can be effective for several montfis. • Quickly absorbed by plants. • Broken down through plant use, microbial activity, and heat. • Well-timed usage of tow quantities. Cvntralling rLan-ofif J el~o~sion • gins with proper design and construction n>~dlods. Foll~nr erasicgn & sediment control standards. • ccompac:t soil and loci on scopes. • Retention basins needed to collect surtace water. • Adequate subsurface drainage in turf areas. Prepar~i by: Dave Sandrodc Assistant Golf Course Superintendent Desert Forest Golf Giub Cdr free, Ari~one~ Professional Golf Turf Management Rutgers University BA 6eoenvamrxt~errtat Studies Shipperrsburg University 2 :~; ~, a c ~o 1 .~ c w .r .~ s ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~d ~~ k ~ 2 .~ 1~ ,1 ~~ s~ o• °,.~, N ti5 W c:f ~r'~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~3 ` ,,.a"o~~O<7 ' ~ ~ Y:~ p?E;=~"=~a. wt„s_ca~~~E• oaoaiii• ov~~~ ~ /~+.... ~i_ ~o~>~i ^~0~"o7~oio5so ~J. ~~e;S~C6~;9~G • _ ; :"a~~= 4,_ +~:e4oa~ ~S6k`;o" -z~S~oBoo~~~< .._ i E _. , ~~~~. v-°a. -. .~< =o ` .~ ,. a~~-~, o, ,._.. .o.~o,.a:.BSc .-: s,os~ '~ ^p.- ; - . ~e ._:_ _ , .. 1 _ y .' I j._ -.. ~ I I , ti ,^~ i _... .., ~ ~ , ,. ,. ~ , :, , _ , YF 1 Y... ~ ~~ t ` ~ ~ ~1 ,- 1. if 1 ` ~ ~~. 1~ , t _ v ~ ~ " ~ r h~,, l ! ! ~ ~ _ ~ ' I ~ ~1 . ~ t ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ra tt7~JJBBB/ ~' ~ I i '~ LI r~ - 1 ', r ~, ~. ~~~a ~ ~ j~ .' 1 ~ j \ 1` T I d, " 1 ..._ .. 4 ._ .. i i, ~ 1~4.~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ - ~ ~ . /~~ ,~ ~ ~ 1 "~ ~' ~ ~~ ~ ~ 1 I`/~ ,~ I~ .. 'fir j i~ ~.t `~~~1 ~I~ / 6~ 1 'I. ~ -~ j ~ s ~~ ~. ~ ~ ~~ ,,\ ~ __ ~ , r ~'F,: ~ ~~ i ~ ~~d ~,t ~ ,~ '~~ ` ~ { ~,1 p,4: l~ 1 1 I 1r -~ /~ 1 .'-~ir ~~ ~' N 11 ~ ~'~W!t ~ nY r y ~r/j;+~/'~.~/~~f! ' 1 ~ f >,. ~ 1.'1 s.. i f °l. ( ~ ~~i!ir:'n,~+v .4~ I ~;•}`4X61'.; I ~ ~~.+ ~x~~t ' aY' I'; ~ r '''" J 6`' ~~+~. I ~~~~ ~~ I : - ~ '- r 1 1 < ~"~ yr ~r ~~ f ~~~ y `~~ - ~, -C. fir. ~ ~. ,r~ ~*,'(M f~ '~ ~ ~h-f~,, ~~) ass ~-_ ~ _, ~ '~~~r r '-,~ Y:4 if 1r. ra 4 r 1. a s- r ~~~~ 1d-;r t y {~5 ~1 ~ ~s ti t ~ ~ ~ ~c %~ r h 'y~~', r 31ti~ IA ^~ ',fix ,~ k f 1 ~"~ 1 a ~ -,, , t . ~ , _ ___ ;: _ _ ~! - , 1 -~.,,t-._ t _ ; '~d y - r ~.~.i i_.._.- '1 do a ~. g6 6 g~ ~~ o II Saul Farm Golf Club °°'~RSH~'°" BY' b ~ I Roanoke, VA, USA ~° r~„cF-e~.~u~ County ~of Roanoke Community. Development - Planning & Zoning 5204 Bernard Drive P O Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 772-2108 Fnr .Ctaff 7TcP Only Datcreceived: r-- ~ Receivedb,~; Application fee: `~ PCBZA date: ~ ,~ Placards issued: BOS date: ~ : Case Number 2 ~ - ~ J z06 ~ Owner's name/address w/zip S .Mark Ha r re 11 3716 Colonial Ave. Roanoke, VA 24018 Phone: (540) 776-8748 Fax No. (540) 776-3119 Property Location Magisterial District:. C a v e S r i n 3716 Colonial Ave. Roanoke, VA 24018 CotnmuniryPlanningarea: Cave Spring -Tax Map No.: 7~7 . 1 8 - 3 - 2 4 Existing Zoning: C -1 Size of parcel(s): Acres: . 5 Existing Land Use: e -1 (Pay-check $ P 1 u s ) u ,. ~, _ ., „ , _ I, C ~E:'Z'©LVL'VG~h'D:SPECZ~lL,U~E PEK1V1~7T AP'PLIC~VTS (F%`S'~ _ - I Does th parcel meet the m;n;murn lot area, width, and .frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes ~ No O IF NO, A VARIANCE LS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the a1'nimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes ~ No 0 IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIItED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes ~ No O - Variance of Section(s) _ _ _ _ of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. / V R/ V R/ V Consultation 8 1/2" x 11" concept plan Application fee Application ~ Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable ~ Justification ~ Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the property or the owner s agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the lmowledge and consent of the owner. ~~;~ _ ,~ , ,, `,~`-' 1- Owner s Signature ,. ~i~.r ~' ^'fmt c .. ,u-x2~} i Yrr3'rt~~-" e^ - ~~C~'da''i ~ .G'r ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~w _ ~ , _ f`~~~~-o~ }Loy aR~,~~_~ P;~~s~ ;~ ~ ~;~ ~ ~ - ' ' i' r,,,, . ' , Applicant J~ Mark Harrell The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests io determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answei the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes 'of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. This request is to add two offices off the back as shown in the drawing. Two parking spaces will have to be cleared to meet to requirements for the additional square footage. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. This .request conforms to the guidelines recently past for transition of neighbo-ring properties.by having the addition residentail in appearance. The two parking spaces that have to be added due to county .guidelines will be in a location that conforms to.the transition guidelines as well. Please describe the impact{s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fue and rescue. There will be no impact. The area is already properly screened. ~, Only a roofline will possibly be visible in any diection. Plus, ~I the addition will be residential in appearance. ~~ A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shallgraphically depict the -land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising. from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant, may proffer conditions to Limit the future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County permitting r bQuiations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoniin_g or imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit and variance applications, The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of de'.ail may vary, depending on the nature of the request. The County Planning Division staff may exempt some of the items or suggest .the addition of extra items, but the following are considered minimum: AI,Z APPLICANTS -„ - a. Applicant name and name of development b. Date, scale and north arrow c. Lot size in acres or square feet and, dimensions ~ d. Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties e. Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. `x f. The .zoning and land use of all adjacent properties g. All property Lines and easements h. All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights i. Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development ~` j. Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces Additional information required for REZONING AND SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANTS k. Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site 1. Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings -and crossovers m. Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals .~ n. Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections o. - Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants ~~ p. Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed q. if project is to be phased, please show phase schedule I certify that all items required in the checklist above are complete. ~~~ ~ Signature of applicant - Date SL ``nui~C ~~rie ~1 y~-1 ~- 5 Z U O O O b J ~I 0 ~~.s9s~ coy ~ ~ ~ /~ ,~ ~~=. SEC. ROUTE j/ 72G COLONIAL AtiEiVUE N52'49'30"E 137.4G' ~ I J 1 S r F ( ~. ~ 'A L z r z e a~ n vl J WATER I 1. S. MARK HARRELL. SUBMl7 7HE FOLLOWING VOLUNTARY PROFFERS IN ASSOCIATION WITH MY REQUEST TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 0.5 ACRES FROM R-1 i0 C-i COMMERCIAL LOCATED AT 3716 COLONIAL AVENUE: i. SICNAGE SHALL BE UNITED TO A MAXIMUM OF 30 SOUAR£ FEET IN AREA WITH SOFT LIGHTING 1. NO a001)IONAL EXTERIOR UGHTINC SHaLt BE ALLOwEO_ 3. USES SHALL BE LIMITED TO ACCOUNTING/FlNANCIAL SERVICES BUSWESS. 4. PARKING L07 ACCESS SHALL BE OFF THOMPSON LANE AND SHALL BE LIMITED 70 A MAXIMUM OF EIGHT SPACES. 5. PARKING SHALL BE CONFlNED TO THE REAR YARD ANO SIDE YARD FACMG THE C-2 BUILDING (ON THOMPSONS LANE. 6. HOURS OF OPERATION SHALL BE LIMITED TO 7:00 A. M. TO 9:00 P.M., 6 DAYS A WEEK (SUNDAY OFF). 7. ALL EXTERNAL CHANGES TO THE BUILDING SHALL BE RESIDENTIAL IN APPEARANCE. B. ANY a001T10NS TO THE BUILDWC SHALL BE APPROVED ONLY THROUGH 7HE SPECIAL USE PERMI771NC PROCESS. I LOT i 6 yI -- ~ __ S53'30 O LOT 2; ~ ~7 PROPOSED DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE STEPHEN MARK HARRELL LOT 1, SECTION 2, GREEN VALLEYS PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 192 CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT, ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA CURRENT OWNER: STEPHEN MARK HARRELL STREET ADDRESS IS: 3716 COLONIAL AVENUE SCALE .,~j ' = 20" NOTES: PREPARED BY: CLARK SURVEYING TAX # 77.18-3-24 ACQUIRED 1N: DB. 1574/1324 P.O. BOX 5575 Np TITLE REPORT FURNISHED ~ ~- RoANOXE, VIRGINIA PROPERTY IS DESIGNATED AS IN A PHONI': (540f 362-1002 F. E.M.A. DEFINED ZONE C " 9J R s Z7 J8. T 14.- C ~ Jt ca- ;a< 0 20 ~~~ Scale"=20FT DATE JAN. 6, DISK 74 ?: ~~ 1 ~ ~~; t: ~ 1 ! t ri-'' ~'' I~~ ~~ ,~) ~ ~ ~G~ 7.; • c ~ N z ~, ...~ ,,~~ „ ~,: / ,-, , ~ I~/17-183 ~ -M7 165. _ -' Apo 3 t ~ /~ I-M7-P7c rw~---....--... ~ ~j ~~~Ci~' I-M7=183A. .. ~~7 ~ ~~~~~ .F ~t ~, o j ~ i-M`7-~8-4 ~ '~ ~~ ~ r i I-M7-I6~ a v=>.~ ~ ~p ,.IS = o = to.a: -M7-163 1 ' I-M7-169 ' 0 _ \ /` ,..~ ~-$71 ~ I~ ~-168 "i o= N.~F~ t-M 7--161 ~ I-M7-I71 ' PLUG.G `~` I-M 7-'67 u 1=(V'(7-157 ~!' c, ' ,~ i f i ro PLJ G .o ~~ / sa• ''/3 I-M7-172 O ~ 199 ~Z ~M7--160 ' lI=M7--166 I-M7--176 ~ - •~. 1=t4f7-15 2y3~ _~;~o~ ~Q~P~,/ '~; a- 3.0 ~ "~ 8~ ~.. ~ I M7-159 C~' ~. "~ ,~ I-M7-p`~ I-M7-155 ~' as ` .~,-I~7-176 A I-M7 r ~ ~ ~'Z De `3.8~ '~I M7 182A I~M7-''153 ` 6~ ~ ' ~~9 = g• % ~ ~ S, ~ ~ ~1-~?-1658 ., i-M7182 J .~._...::. 1=M7--158 _~h ~7a..q' :;~~._ ;•~ ^ ' ~ ~ 1 ~. o 1 ~, pz8.9rt 30 ~' `'r. ~, M^~ Q 3-1+17-I I i A il, .~- , ~ t ~~ y ~ ; C ~ S. . ~ 'O ~`~ '' ' `~3-m7 It1 cps r ., . ~ j + ~ ~ !; - ~~, ~3.M7-(10 ~ s,,. -~ ., ._.._ ~.., _ b, , . • 4i,Ae V?g _ o_ • ~, , .. `~ . ~, . _ ._ , ,. A _ ,~ , ., ''tea ` 3:M~-109 •,... O . - '... "'~-. ...~. ....-._...-_.^^....- ti-.may - - - p. _ :."" _;..~~ ~ C_ t~ ~' ~ 5: .. __-- _.. PAYC-K1~G-KS--.P~.v -- -. --.:::: 43P::1~Z~FZ ?'~::f~~'Sp~--ASKGK iT~ ~Z~5 ~' -~c• AL~c-w Gcstic~T• L Ex 1 DTI A __: =-5"C~-ate."E-_ i:~.==..).=CJ: - _ --- - _. PcF2.63~nt . ~. County of Roanoke For Staff Use Only _ Community Development Dale received ~~ ~ Received by,~ Planning & Zoning `- 5204 Bernard Drive Application fee: ~ „,~ PGBZA dale: ~ ~ P O Box 29800 +~ ~'' ~ Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Placards issued: BOS dale: (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 772-2108 r~ ~ ~~ O Case Number ~ ~ - ~ ~ ZG ~ ~ ~~: a I AST F 1 DDT Tl'.f AITQ ` -. ~= y Check type of application filed (check all that apply) ~ Rezoning p' Special Use ~ Variance Applicants name/address w/zip Phoneme ~f~ 3&'~ °'~C~C-~ ~~ "1~! C ~. ~~z jip.~, i.~~/) ~~ 1~. ~~ Fax No. Owner's name/address w/zip Phone: `'j~~-3'f~{_ ~7i.2 ~ 1. ~.,J .C' • ~~R ~.~ . ~tjG„~ L°,(f7~f2aJi~j;q i./>4-~i ~~ ~k? Fax No. ~,~ .~, v~ . a~~~n Property Location ~ ~6 ~j1z ~ 'b ~ ~7 Magisterial District: ~ , ~ ~ , ~~~~ c i ~i ~ r'" ,~ ~~~ 7 Community Planning area: G~~~R Tax Map No.: j 3. rj j~ y- j - t;~, I Existing Zoning: Size of parcel(s): Acres: r~_ g73 Existing Land Use: ~-~t~'YE1-~IEf~IC~ ~'C,il„1L 'I{EZD~VING ~~VD SFECI_=1L ~rSE PERbIIT ~PPLIC-1~~lS (R~ 5) _ , Proposed Zoning: Proposed Land Use: ~j ~ Crsti1Y'~]~1~~T1[,~ $ic~~ Does the parcel meet the min,rr,um lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes ~ No ~ II' NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes O No ~ IF' NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes ~ No O TT~RIff~~'CE :~PPLIC~VTS' (k} Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WII.~L NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF T~SE ITEMS ARE NIISSING OR INCOMPLETE. i V V ' V Consultation 8 1/2" x 11" concept plan Application fee Application Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable Justification Water an application Adjoining property owners I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the p the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner. ~..--~ Owner's Signature ;T'f.~!TC'~.TION.._.FJR 73~,ZONiNG.OR SP~CIAI., ITSE EE,Ritil?T RE~,UEST -> _ _. ;., .. Applicant The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. This project provides goods and services to the community in which it is located. The community plan encourages smaller businesses located in the commmnit.y village concept. The removal of the old building and the proposed up grades of the site will improve the quality of this development and the community Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. The project brings goods into the community on a scale which relates to the area. The goods and services provided by this development allow the citizens of this community to shop locally as opposed to a longer commute. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. The removal of the existing facility, the addition of a new building and improvement to the canopy and .site elements will have a postive impact on this property and the surrounding properties. The existing utilities are adequate to serve the new project. ~~~ s ~4 z4 ~~ ~ ~ ~ 1 cr ~ ~~s / Nm ~ ~~h ~ ~ ,' \ ,~ ,~~ / ~O ~ ~ ~~? i~ i~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~~\ ~/ /® / /~ i / A ~0~,~ /~ //~ ~ s~ •8/~c' o tip` °~~y ~~aP z 0 a v_ i 0 M s~ ,~ O`~ S ~~ ~o , _~. o° ~~ ~~ N~ W° '~ to !-'- Q ~ n g v- Z ~ O~ V~ a ~"'~ ~ a~ ~ ~ p C ~~ V A ~OI'YGE~''T YLAi~i CH~,CILIS'I' A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the Land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential Iand use or design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County permitting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request. The County Planning Division staff may exempt some of the items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the following are considered minimum: ALL APPLICANTS a. Applicant name and name of development b. Date, scale and north arrow _ c. Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions d. Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties _ e. Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. f. The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties g. All property lines and easements h. A11 buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights i. Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development - j. Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces Additional information required for REZOMNG AND SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANTS _ k. Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site _ 1. Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers ____ m. Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals _ n. Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections - o. Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants _ p. Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed _ q. if project is to be phased, please show phase schedule I certify that all items required in the checklist above are complete. Signature of applicant Date ` County of Roanoke ' ~ Community Development Planning & Zoning 5204 Bernard Drive P O Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0795 (540) 772-2068 F.~~ (Sa0) 772=' 108 For Staff Use OrLIv Dace received: Received by: s~a51o~ ~~- Application fee: eo PCBZA date: SUP ~ 4d 7/3 61 F!acards issued: BOS date: 7 ~Z~{~~~ Case ~Iumher a~- "~ ~ Z O O ~ c ~~ I~ Check t~~pe of application filed (chec, all that apply) D RezoningSpecial Use D Variance Aopiicants nasLei address w/zir~ Phone: 3'~ 2 - 7 09 1/Js~iTE ~,sSaGtA'rE.S ~ . GA~oWE_ P.o. ~o x cv 3~ o Fa.~ No. 9 8 t- o cog 9 '~ 7 Ractinoka VA 2yD1 Owner's name!address w/zip Phone ~? 3- 3 39 5 _ Fred E, -CAy lot , ~r ~tinCD.5~1~ -'V~f~ Z~a90 PropetryLocauon be+weCr+ Mect•~man Rd ' 'NlaaisterialDistrict: eAVE 5PR1>y~ & Cr~5~a1 Creek Dr. , a.pQcox. c.oc~ W e5'c of CGC ~ wr ~ c'h t Dr. Community Planning area: Tai yla~o No .: BT. 1'f - ~ -12 ~ q~• b S - 1 - 27 R ~ Existing Zoning: Size of parcel(s): Acres: ~• b3 ~ 8 • ~ 2 ~ Existing Land Use: .~ RE~OYIc~'G .-1!VD' SPECIAL, LrSE PEt?.biZ~' APPLIC~TS ~R/5) _ 1 Proposed Zoning: R 1 ProuosedLandUse: c~us-rE~ 5u8s~,v,s-onI Does the pazcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes ~ No D IF NO, A VARIAI~TCE iS REQU'IRED FIRST. Does the pazcel meet the. minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes O No IF NO, A VARIANCE I5 REQU`iRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes D No _ ~ ~. T~~RL4~YCE'APPLIC.~~TS (~ _ _ ~ - { Variance of Section(s) 30-82- 13.\ - F.2. A of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: EX~1'Gnd c~.~5}.anct. o~ mo5i- c t mo~ e c~Wel1'~n ~ ~~oM Soon ~-a $00~ o. v~c1+C acG$55 a'~n'~' ~~ m ._ .t_ ___,.___.__ .. __,_.e~ ~,e~~o ,.,,o,.,, ;f or,.~„~o,~ ~apT Tra-rrniv wtT,T. NOT BE ACCEPTED i~' ANY OF TH] 1, to rr d~~llcraLLUU ~rVL1L~11Gl1.: LLb:1J\. V1lV Va111 VYV~v~V U. •~..~...~`.•+..--_ ..-- ITEMS AR F 1~IISSING OR INCOMPLETE. R/S V R/S V Rl5 V / { Consultation 8 1/2" x 11" concep[ plan V ~ Application fee { Application -- Metes and bounds description - Proffers, if applicable { lustincation - Water and sewer application / { Adinining property owaets I hereby certify that I am either the owner's agent .~ r"--"and am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner. Ownet's Signature j 3c,T5',I'I~'IC~=i'I`ION Ii'GIZ R ZOI*~NG GR SFECIAI:;'.t7SI+ PER14II~ RE~~EST ~` -, Applicant The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following q stions as thoroughly as possiole. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section f~0-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. Please explain how the project conforms to the Community Plan. guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Please describe the impact(s) of the quest on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public servi~ s and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. ~7S'T~"iCATi~N FOR ~?.~NCE ~tEQLJES'T Applicant The Board of Zoning Appeals is required by Section 15.2-2309 of [he Code of Virginia to a variance can be granted. Please read the factors listed below carefully and in your own v each factor. If additional space is needed, use additional sheets of paper. 1. The variance shall not be contrary to the public interest and sha11 be in harmony the Zoning Ordinance. 2. The strict application of the zoning ordinance would produce (as distinguished from a special privilege or convenience) and property. / ~' ~er the following factors before ,describe how the request meets intended spirit and purpose of hardship; a hardship that approaches connscation prohibit or unreasonably restrict the use of the 3. The hardship is not shared by other properties ~ the same zoning district or vicinity. Such hardships should be addressed by the Board of Supervisors as amendments to the Zoning Ordinance. -~ 4. The variance will not be of a substantial detriment to the adjacent properties or the character of the district. ;: .. ~ ~ _. COTSiC PLAT CH~CI~LIST A concept plan of the proposed project must be submir~ed with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development of the property and by so Join>> correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County pe•-nzitting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may reeuire changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use pe:rnit or varia~:ce, the concept plan may be altered to the ~„ent pe.:rvtted by the zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit and variance applications. The plan should'oe prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depeadins on the nature of the request. The County Planning Division staff may exempt some of the items or suga st the addition of e:.tra items, but the following are considered minimum: ALL APPLICANTS / a. Applicant name and name of development ~ b. Date, scale and north arrow / c. Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions d. Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties / e. Physical features such as hound cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. s/ f. The zonine and land use of all adjacent properties /~ g. All property lines and easements ~, h. All buildings, e.„fisting and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights a/ i. Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adiacent to the development / j. Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces Additional information required f ar REZONING AND SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANTS / k. E.~tisting utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site / 1. Any driveways, entrancesie:~its, curb openings and crossovers ~,-• "m. Topogzaphy map in a suitable scale and contour intervals / n. ~ Approximate street grtides and site distances at intersections o. Locations of all adjacent ftre hydrants p. Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed q. if project is to be phased, please show phase schedule I certify that ail items required in the checklist above are complete. l °` ".~ M a...~ 25 , 2001 c. -r N _~ ~. // ~._ m ~~ a _^ Q ~,:. ~/~y0 S/~ -~.` ~ ~ n 1 O .,~`~\, ,.. n 1 ~., [/~j ~ ~ ~V :l 1.;\ ~,`~ :: ~, ~; '-~~J ~ 4 m ~, .~ o ., ~~ o ~. N ~~,,,` I R~~, ~\\ /', ., ©~ ~°~ ~~ °c~ 26 d~ ~~ .~ m n ` Im 1 N m ~ .~ !M~ q F 1 `ill Z O i o ~ ° ~ ~ V N ~ w ~ j ~ oaQ ~ ~ Z ~~ ~ ~ $ ~j~~~ t! ~ ~ ~' V ¢ ~ ~ O 4 5 ° ~ rE. Ci B ~ . 3~ k~ ~~1 ~ ~ ' W ~ ~ < ~~~"~~z ~ ~ ; ~ ~ . ~ q 2 W c ov taj i ~ E k A r ` T l ~ N w x e ~^iz ~ ~ d U ' ' ~ l J ' ~ ~ b ~ ~ a ~ # ~ ~~ ;~ $~\ ~ ~ ~~~~l~~ ~`:~~; / g ~~ ~_ ~~ 4 ~ ~` A ~ yl \: ., N ~; ~ h ~y~, ~~ `\ ~' `\ ~ \ ~i ``, N ,` \\ O \\\\' ^ \ ,y ~ ~~L ~:,, jA, ;~'' ~ ~! ~ o ~~~~~~~~~ 0 0 ~, o„ a O a a o. ,, ~~ , o ~~ o a D 1 i E ~ ~ n ~ 1 b ~~ ~~ ~ , ~~ ~x rl 1 ~, \ f ``~ N Q / ~I ~ I1 d ~ `~'~ t OI ~1 ~Y / ^ ~,`". ' ~, ~'~. ~~ {:\ I ap h.M __ ^\, L_ ~~. Q ' A~ n m I ~,, r 11 m ~ 1~, ~ti. \` \ .. \ r A\ ~~ ~ R;. i y .~ / m m `, D6 O~ 2~ dd ms's ~ ~ m ~ 1 m N ~ ~ <?y~5j On 31/~j~ -- ~./ b'j ) I/ ~ y S ~ ~~\\i. \'` \'~,.\ ~~ 1~ 1 N ~~ '`~~ ~ .ti.~A . O ~ o ~~ ~~ o D n 0 ,~~, :,~.~~,. :z::~ O y;`; T-= I m " ~ ~ ' ~ N m V Q m h ~ ~: m ~"5 p~ U ~ ~:~~? w ~ _ ~ ~ :.~ a ~ x a ~~~-~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W ~ ° a<Ew q a W ` w F- Ul Q W ~ ` x O 6 ~2~ ~ 5 a ~J W ~ a< ~ ` 3 ~~~~~~< a ' 3 S a i $ y 3 &d a n ~ j \ y dad 8 & ~. / ~ .~ ~~, ~_ .~, ~~ ~.._ ~~~ ~ ., ~~; "•~ ~~ N < ,ti\ , I b < ~~\;,, o ~ ~*~ ~ bl rJ Ii ~' 11~ ~ ~1) L~ ^ 1 1 ~ 1 s .. \ , ,~: .. ~~ ~$ n i n ``\ ,,\ ``\ N `` ~~ ^° ~ T ~ ~ ro~ .b ~~ i a Counh~ of Roanoke _ Community Development Planning ~ Zoning ~ 5204 Bernard Drive P O Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 772-2108 For Staff Use Only Dare received: Received by: as o ! M rtw Anplicadue tee: 40 0 O PC/BZA dare: ~ o! Placards issued: BOS dare: ? 24 6! Case ~lurnber d5 - 7 1 ~ OG ~ /c- ~ dLL, APPLIC.-1.VTS Check type of application filed (check all that apply) ~ Rezoning Special Use O Variance Applicants name; address w/zip ~E+~~.L~,i ~,j v i~3 Phone ~ 7 ~ - G '~~ 5 D~31k ~'tpsr w~~ II' L1..G ~~ ~- Cr 2. 3 '~ 3.G3~{ 1,Dv~~~1L C.2., Fax No. r2~ ~a o 1CF ~~. ~ ti e t 8 Owner's name address wJzip ~ e ~ ~~ Phone: 33 (o - ~ ~~~. 33 S 7 Sax lll~ ~~99~q ~~.(( /n Z~l~..~'-iv Fax No. ~ 3~ . (c5~- 3G ~~ Property Location ,~ ~~ fit` Y ~ ~~ ~"' ~~r£ ,~ ~~ i:+J~- Magisterial District: ~~ ~ ~0~1, Community Planning area: L~u~ ~P2,~~ Tax Nlap No.: $ ~r 0 8 - j ' ~- '- :Z Existing Zoning: C,. Size of parcel(s): Acres: G • ~~ ( , Existing Land Use: V ~ G A ~ REZONING ~ iND SPEC1 dL L'SE PER:YIIT ,-IPPLIC:~VTS (.R!S i Proposed Zoning: ~ -~ - S J ~ Proposed Land Use: ~~~~+ t t.._ Does e parcel meet the minimum Iot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes 1 No O IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQITIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes ~ No ~ IE' NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes O No 0 VriRI~~VG`E :-1PPLIC.~~VTS (V~ I Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION ~YiLL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF A.YY OF TFIESE ITEMS ARE iVIISSL~TG OR INCOIV~LETE. / V V ' V Consultation ~ 8 1/2" x 11" concept plan Application fee Application Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable ,Tustitication Water and server application Adjoining property owners I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the prop owner' gent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner. Owner's Sisnature _. i .~Cu•~~~~~!~Ct~i~~~1j.. F~o~' ~~fl~1~l:Cz {RJR 5~~.~~-~~. ~S P~~~'~i ~~2~~~ Applicant i ~i°' The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of pubiic health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 3Q-3) as well as the purl ose found at the beginnine of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. j14t5 Q~.tl,SE~T LJi~L (Z,rGLac.~i1= M4 L.lciS~~^'(r SZ~-iAl~ 34+st.Uc.sS~ ~t~y ~~ ~G~~h9•~~al~i3~ ~2oM R-dANa~ t'/~a^[ I,v'~ ~.c4~~+c~ CovNt~Y, !E~-~ 1-~l2G~.2 S~o,2.~ Sig-cUi.~ ~f-n;~.~ir~ AAAtt'tdN~L ~J°19L~'`;MC,Vi q;v,~ Mv!i~ d~.dcAi- ;Ax Aczt.:~2S +liA rUc2.~.-AS£.~ S~C~j~ Tt~£ °2~Ti=mar S~o~;+..,a t~tA~-.E ~~Y ~~~tnrt~4~ AF~~~~ ,~:a i,2.~~~~i~. ~'tc;~ As wf; A+c.E. A DLi'~N.b i ~c,.S t~v,i iN~tSS, ~tiU tn1~. cu 1l. L., i~5~ '7-!#~ ,~kti ~r~=~v- ENi lL~i~'~ To T!t E P2d? 1=2'~ t~+H tc t-t W tit G!L£A ~ N O Pa._£.~u'?'v~ L SA F~ i Y ~•4 2..:a 2.D , 0 v '~ Qvrw~tS t5 .S':2Lti~.y ~~;/ltL., k~i1 ~vKS NC°~ G~~.upJt~~ Amy .i?Y-~`~cALtt~, iN'kiiC.i', ~l311C..~ Q~ t'',/~lZl~~t.~Oti3s '77+ ~`~~ ~/1~1CC/~$~tiM~,v'J a'~. PU ~lo'~r'a ~ ~ Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. ~s iL~tAi-~!~ L,U ~l ~.02~. /-~rz~.A , r~i+4. ~1,~~~ t~,4! Q ~~.~ j~tS A~7;~~L cv 'T'nANSt. tc~ t/o2 SEv~2:rat_ ~'~rz~ A'~1a Ca~Tc~1;,~ €S 'Tp rn~ia.+~v~E i,.1trN M~~ ~203'~t-± t,,ltt_~ l~.~ U~-+ pns A ~ A~STA~.T t~ 1L+-~ ~E~ D~vs=+-o~Ert~N i~Si~/(~- u~IG- Wt7'N ~2~~ .DES1L.n~ YN!~F' Go~iS A~e~~d.dA~"~ Q ~:~i~ A d~1 G ~~ q M~Ld t ~~A.E. of ~~~L~rttrJ'r 3;;~c.~s~sS~S. 1-'1Y rSvs+~uESSt ~2~c-Az~ )QOeI`is~(r L"pV~~~ Cp.vF02.'s/l~ '~d ~JCI..S~-v'C: ~0nitn7~1-, t CAL ~~NiSck~~ ~ r3 t v! t ~1 G- W 1 t_ t. C6 ~vt P ~ ~-rt E ,rt>'Y A,+? '`f p C 7~ E N ~,n1 ~ S '~ r'L 11 ~..A t~..'~ 1 j~'~Zi?.i 4:.E r~ t v ; r(c S ~.o~ AnwA ~A='~ ~ S t;2~0 ~ +4 ~ /~n1 ~ ~c.;4.~t P ~~, Fr2 Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. T1t £ iM Pta ~- ~ O tJ T4+ ~ !=x t $ i tn3(r (~i2 A P ~27~'' iii' t LL R ~ ~ '1`U 2 /li A til E ~~ S e! Fl/~ 1~'tw i9 ~Es~2.~1atE ,/~>rAt~ ~o~qq-7p,cl,, ~~ t~+ttL (3aoS~ 'fir rM~IGE of ThIE db30cvt-o b- ~USG~FSi~s.. ~~~o/r.+1(1- ~i 1/~1L.`~ ©c..1~ UNWA~t1'~€aD l~a~s~ i4~~ Ga~~~- ~lN`.~ LoNS ~vzt'c~lr r{ s -t-~~ ~ ~4~/~ /h,~~o~v~zy ~ Y2 vLT v.2g. w <<~. D6.c='~EA,S!~. 7'~~ ~.t K.~ ~t tYa©~ d F 'Tl~~ NE~~ ~ ~. F~•~ A~'~ (zEScu>+, - ~+E c~Pac~ o>ll W~4c~.2 q~vp SEw-€~ wt[.-L ~~ Otu~ TJ tL~ s~ AnJl) (Wp ~cA:IC~ , A -~ ~~ r y r ~`~ :. i 1 CRAIGHEAD A55dCIATE~ Architects, D~igr~ers, Co»~tnution Mu~agers ~'~~ Ta }tq,s~~ I .~ J ~- ~ ~ ---` ~ c `; I ~` ~ t . ~ ~~ _ ~ ~__ ; ~~ ~... J . < < ice. ~ ~~ 1 ~ . 1 ~~-~ f ~ ~~ Sr ~~ S I 1 ~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~~ 4~yG ~~~--1, ~ ~. r 1,~4« ~ o ~ .~ ~. _ _ _ . , --r.~rtr e~Y - feY ~~.1VA`~ ~Y~ L~t~&s ~ ~p ~ 5 fib t.~'~our t•,} ~~' ~~ 5~z{,6r ecc a Q~~ ~r I•~-' -,. ~1Gw7~S S~~.ri-~ P~~ iaiv citM(.IIEnh, nttt•ilfr!:~'r 2721 t3RAM8LE'tON AVENUE. S. W, • P.O. BOX 4662 • ROANOKE:. 17A. 24~'~IS • 15401 774-5321; .~ , s AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 26, 2001 ORDINANCE 062601-6 AUTHORIZING CONVEYANCE OF AN EASEMENT TO APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE TO STARKEY PARK OWNED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism is developing ball fields and related facilities on the property owned by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, located off Virginia Secondary Route No. 613 (Merriman Road) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke, known as Starkey Park; and, WHEREAS, Appalachian Power Company (APCO) requires a right of way for an overhead line or lines and related improvements across Starkey Park to provide electric service for lighting the ball fields, as shown on APCO Drawing No. V-1183, dated May 1, 2001; and, WHEREAS, the proposed right of way will serve the interests of the public and is necessary for the public health, safety, and welfare of citizens of the County of Roanoke. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance. A first reading of this ordinance was held on June 12, 2001, and a second reading was held on June 26, 2001. 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the interests in real estate to be conveyed are hereby declared to be surplus, and are hereby made available for other public uses by conveyance to Appalachian Power Company for the provision of electrical service in connection with Roanoke County's Starkey Park development. 3. That donation of a right-of-way for an overhead line(s) and related 1 .~ a J improvements across Starkey Park to provide electric service for lighting the ball fields, as shown on APCO Drawing No. V-1183, dated May 1, 2001, to Appalachian Power Company is hereby authorized. 4. That the County Administrator or any Assistant County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such further actions as may be necessary to accomplish this conveyance, all of which shall be in a form approved by the County Attorney. 5. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Holt n, MC Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Pete Haislip, Director, Parks, Recreation & Tourism Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development 2 ACTION NO. ITEM N0 . ~ ' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 26, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING CONVEYANCE OF AN EASEMENT TO APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE TO STARKEY PARK OWNED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Recommend approval EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This is the second reading of the proposed ordinance to authorize donation of an easement to Appalachian Power Company (APCO) for an electric service line(s) across Starkey Park for lighting the ball fields. BACKGROUND: The Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism is developing ball fields and related facilities on the property owned by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, located off Virginia Secondary Route No. 613 (Merriman Road) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District of Roanoke County, known as Starkey Park. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Installation of electric transmission lines and related improvements is necessary to provide lighting to the ball fields at the new regional park. Appalachian Power Company (APCO) requires a right of way and easement for the electric line(s) . A .. I across the park property as shown on APCO Drawing No. V-1183, dated May 1, 2001. FISCAL IMPACTS: Consideration for the proposed easement is the sum of $1.00. ALTERNATIVES: (1) Adopt the proposed ordinance authorizing the County Administrator to execute the necessary documents for donation of the electric service line(s) easement as shown on APCO Drawing No. V-1183, dated May 1, 2001, to Appalachian Power Company. (2) Decline to authorize donation or conveyance of the easement. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt the proposed ordinance as provided in Alternative #1. SUBMITTED BY: Pete Haislip, Director Parks, Recreation & Tourism Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by APPROVED BY: C~C~'''''"" Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Church Johnson McNamar Minnix Nickens Vote No Yes Abs G:\BOARD\2001 Uune26\StarkeyPark.APCOesmt.rpt.wpd ~. ^~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 26, 2001 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING CONVEYANCE OF AN EASEMENT TO APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE TO STARKEY PARK OWNED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism is developing ball fields and related facilities on the property owned by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, located off Virginia Secondary Route No. 613 (Merriman Road) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke, known as Starkey Park; and, WHEREAS, Appalachian Power Company (APCO) requires a right of way for an overhead line or lines and related improvements across Starkey Park to provide electric service for lighting the ball fields, as shown on APCO Drawing No. V-1183, dated May 1, 2001; and, WHEREAS, the proposed right of way will serve the interests of the public and is necessary for the public health, safety, and welfare of citizens of the County of Roanoke. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance. A first reading of this ordinance was held on June 12, 2001, and a second reading was held on June 26, 2001. 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the interests in real estate to be conveyed are hereby declared to be surplus, and are hereby made available for other public uses by conveyance to Appalachian Power Company for the provision of electrical service in connection with Roanoke County's Starkey Park development. 3. That donation of aright-of--way for an overhead line(s) and related improvements across Starkey Park to provide electric service for lighting the ball fields, as shown on APCO Drawing No. V-1183, dated May 1, 2001, to Appalachian Power Company is hereby authorized. 4. That the County Administrator or any Assistant County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such further actions as may be necessary to accomplish this conveyance, all of which shall be in a form approved by the County Attorney. 5. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. G:\BOARD\2001 Uune26\StarkeyPark.APCOesnt.ord.wpd ACTT N NUM ITEM NUMBER -1- J~ r" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 26, 2001 SUBJECT: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1. CLEAN VALLEY COUNCIL The two year term R. Vince Reynolds, will expire June 30, 2001. 2. LEAGUE OF OLDER AMERICANS ADVISORY COUNCIL The one year term of Steven L. Harrah expired on March 31, 2001. 3. ROANOKE COUNTY CABLE TELEVISION COMMITTEE The three year term of James B. Dickey expired on June 13, 2001. 4. ROANOKE VALLEY GREENWAY COMMISSION The three-year term of Donald Witt expired on April 8, 2001. 5. ROANOKE VALLEY REGIONAL CABLE TV COMMITTEE The three year term of James B. Dickey will expire June 30, 2001. 6. SOCIAL SERVICES ADVISORY BOARD The unexpired four-year term of Raymond Denny, representing the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, is vacant. Dr. Betty McCrary, Director of Social Services has received notification from Mr. Denny that he resigned effective January 17, 2001. The term will expire August 1, 2004. 1 „, l .~ I -. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: Mary H. Allen, CMC Elmer C. Hodge Clerk to the Board County Administrator -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE No. Yes Abs Approved () Motion by: Church _ _ _ Denied () Johnson _ _ _ Received () McNamara- _ Referred () Minnix _ _ _ To () Nickens _ _ 2 I ~ T,~...u~ M'~ .y~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 26, 2001 RESOLUTION 062601-7 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM J -CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for June 26, 2001, designated as Item J -Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 7, inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of minutes for April 24, 2001, May 8, 2001 and May 10, 2001. 2. Confirmation of committee appointment to Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission. 3. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving Waterford, Section 7. 4. Approval of resolution to Virginia Department of Health, Office of Emergency Medical Services, urging delay of the effective date of new EMS regulations from January 1, 2002 until January 1, 2003. 5. Approval of salary increases of 4 percent for County Administrator and County Attorney. 6. Endorsement of the Blue Ridge-Southwest Virginia Film Office, Inc., as the official agency with the Virginia Film Office to recruit movie and television film production in Southwest Virginia. 7. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving Brookfield, Section 1 and 2. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item 1 .~ pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Consent Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Holt n, CMC Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Richard E. Burch, Jr., Chief, Fire & Rescue Diane D. Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer Danial Morris, Director, Finance Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Joe Sgroi, Director, Human Resources 2 ~-I Apri124, 2001 229 Roanoke County Administration Center 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 April 24, 2001 The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the fourth Tuesday and the second regularly scheduled meeting of the month of April, 2001. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Minnix called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix, Vice-Chairman Joseph "Butch" Church, Supervisors Bob L. Johnson, Joseph McNamara, Harry C. Nickens MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney; Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk to the Board; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator; Dan R. O'Donnell, Assistant County Administrator; Kathi B. Scearce, Community Relations Director IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES The invocation was given by the Reverend Steve Taylor, Ghent Grace Brethren Church. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited by all present. IN RE: BRIEFINGS 1. Briefing on Day Reporting Program. (John Chambliss, Assistant Administrator and Sandi Worley, Program Manager) Mr. Chambliss advised that about a year ago, the Court Service Unit of the April 24, 2001 231 completed over the past eight years and explained that this is due to the Board placing a higher priority on recreation, the 1992 Bond referendum, and to the partnerships with the recreation clubs. He reported that the matching grant program with the recreation clubs was very successful with significant improvements of $509,000 from the 27 grants made to seven recreation clubs in the amount of $158,000. The Public Use Manual which was approved in 1997 identifies the recreation clubs as the primary provider of youth athletics and defines the sanctioned programs and the non-sanctioned programs that do not have to follow the residency or all-play rules. The non-sanctioned teams which could be as many as 70 in the Roanoke Valley are charged a fee which goes into the maintenance fund to provide upkeep of the facilities. He advised that the policies are fair and provide service to the broadest segment of citizens which are the 700 youth athletics teams and 8,800 participants in the County. He advised that the Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission and Presidents Council of Recreation Clubs support the policies and fees as contained in the Public Use Manual. 3. Presentation of fiscal year 2001-2002 budget for Roanoke County. (Elmer Hodge County Administrator Mr. Hodge advised that the budget has been very challenging this year because of the uncertainties of the economy and the state budget, and thanked the Board for their support and foresight in setting goals. He thanked Diane Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer; Brent Robertson, Budget Director; Dan Morris, Finance Director; Penny Hodge, Schools Finance Director; and Dr. Weber, School Superintendent, for their work. He reported that the personal property tax bills have been printed based on a 70% reimbursement from the State. The budget does not assume any increase from April 24, 2001 233 Employees: (a) provided salary increases averaging 4% for School and County employees, and (b) increases the County's health care contribution for School and County employees by $1,218,818. (6) Capital Improvement Program: (a) includes funding designed for improvements to Clearbrook, Mount Pleasant, Vinton and Mason Cove fire stations, (b) included $1,000,000 designed for economic development initiatives at Clearbrook and McDonald Farm, and (c) provides for an additional $500,000 for revenue sharing reserved for public road improvement. Mr. Hodge advised that the School Budget had a deficit of $654,014 but their budget has been balanced. The County budget has a deficit of $626,000 and to balance the budget, Mr. Hodge recommended taking $100,00 for CPMT and $260,000 for the Detention Home from the year end surplus, and an additional $300,000 expense reduction to be absorbed through the County's departments. Even with the deficit, the County will add almost $800,00 to the year end fund balance. As a clarification, Supervisor Church advised that tax relief for the elderly cannot be done immediately but an ordinance will need to be presented for the Board's approval and will not become effective until applications are taken in January 2002. In response to Supervisor Johnson's inquiries, Mr. Hodge advised that the number of full time positions will be 796 after the implementation of positions in the budget; that the number of County vehicles will be available at the work session; and if the County or Schools received additional funds, they will be brought back to the Board. F. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the first reading and set the second April 24, 2001 235 Estates Section 1 and the cul-de-sac, Sequoia Drive, Whitney Estates Section 2 in the Catawba Magisterial District. (Arnold Covey, Community Development Director) 0-042401-1 Mr. Covey advised that this is the second reading of an ordinance to authorize quitclaim and release of a water line easement and sanitary sewer easement so that the streets may be taken into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary Road System. There have been no changes since the first reading. There was no discussion and no citizens present to speak on this issue. Supervisor Church moved to adopt the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None ORDINANCE 042401-1 AUTHORIZING QUIT-CLAIM AND RELEASE OF PORTION OF A TWENTY-FOOT WATER LINE EASEMENT AND TWENTY-FOOT SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT AS SHOWN AND DEDICATED ON PLAT OF SECTION 1, WHITNEY ESTATES IN PLAT BOOK 21, PAGE 36, WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF SEQUOIA DRIVE BETWEEN THE TEMPORARY CUL-DE-SAC OF SECTION 1, WHITNEY ESTATES, AND THE CUL-DE-SAC OF SECTION 2, WHITNEY ESTATES, IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, in order for Sequoia Drive to be accepted into the state secondary road system, the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) requires that the right-of-way be free and clear of any third party rights or encumbrances; and, WHEREAS, VDOT has requested °quit-claim and release to the Commonwealth of Virginia, subject to certain conditions, of all existing easements within the boundaries of Sequoia Drive, namely the following: a portion of a 20' water line easement, shown and dedicated as "20' W.L.E.", and a portion of a 20' sanitary sewer easement, shown and dedicated as "20' S.S.E.", on `Plat Showing Section No. 1, WHITNEY ESTATES, Property of Graham-Thomas, L.L.C.,' dated April 21, 1998, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Plat Book 21, page 36, and extending between the temporary cul-de-sac of Section 1, Whitney Estates, and the cul-de-sac of Section 2, Whitney Estates; and, WHEREAS, it will serve the interests of the public to have Sequoia Drive April 24, 2001 237' 2. Second reading of ordinance authorizing the sale of 0 24 acre surplus public property known as the Leslie Well Lot located on Starkey Lane and the reservation of a 20 foot utility easement. (Melinda Cox Economic Development Specialist 0-042401-2 Ms. Cox advised that this is the second reading of the ordinance and that there is an existing business which would like to expand and purchase this property to have access to their property. Mr. Mahoney advised that the offer was received from Michael Anderson of Varsity Landscaping and Grounds, LLC for $16,900. There was no discussion and no citizens present to speak on this issue. Supervisor Minnix moved to adopt the ordinance. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property, having been made available for other public uses before permitting disposition by sale, is hereby declared to be surplus. 2. That an advertisement for bids for the sale of this surplus real estate was advertised in the Roanoke Times & World News on April 15, 2001; and 3. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading of this ordinance was held on April 10, 2001, and the second reading was held on April 24, 2001, concerning the disposition of the following parcel of real estate identified as follows: Leslie Well Lot Tax Map Parcel No. 87.11-3-10 4. That offers for said properties having been received, the offer of Michael Anderson from Varsity Landscaping and Grounds, LLC to purchase this April 24, 2001 239 NAYS: None RESOLUTION 042401-3 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM I -CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for April 24, 2001, designated as Item J -Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 5, inclusive, as follows: 1. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Interstate Commerce Park. 2. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving The Groves, Section 1. 3. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving The Groves, Section 2. 4. Acceptance of Garland Circle into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 5. Resolution initiating the abandonment of a 0.12 mile section of Glenmary Drive (Route 778) from the Virginia Secondary System of State Highways. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the Consent Resolution ,and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None RESOLUTION 042401-d REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF GARLAND CIRCLE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM WHEREAS, the streets described on the attached Additions Form SR- 5(a), fully incorporated herein by reference, are shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, and WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised this Board the streets meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation, and WHEREAS, the County and the Virginia Department of Transportation April 24, 2001 241 Keith Noell, 5281 Sallie Lane, advised that he wants to form a club baseball team composed of Glenvar Middle School students and is concerned that they will be required to pay a fee for use of fields according to the current policy. He asked the Board to review this policy. Supervisor Church thanked Mr. Noell for his efforts on behalf of county youth and advised that a work session is scheduled today on this subject. Bradley Foro, 8235 Poor Mountain Road, advised that he feels the personal property tax on motor homes and recreation vehicles is excessive and is again asking the board to reduce the rate to the real estate tax rate. IN RE: REPORTS Supervisor Johnson moved to receive and file the following reports. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Future School Capital Reserve 5. Accounts Paid -March 2001 6. Revenues and Expenditures for the nine months ended March 31, 2001 7. Statement of Treasurer's Accountability per Investment and Portfolio Policy as of March 31, 2001 April 24, 2001 243 IN RE: CLOSED MEETING Mr. Mahoney added clarification to a Closed Meeting item by advising that the item pursuant to Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (7) consultation with legal counsel pertaining to litigation involves Roanoke County and American Management Technology. He also added two items pursuant to Section 2.1-344 (7) consultation with legal counsel pertaining to probable litigation involving collection for assessment of BPOL taxes with respect to Home Shopping Network; and Section 2.1-344 (3) acquisition and sale of real properties for public purposes. At 4:20 p.m., Supervisor Minnix moved to go into Closed Meeting following the work session and joint meeting with the School Board pursuant to Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (7) for consultation with legal counsel pertaining to negotiations with Department of Environmental Quality; Section 2.1-344 A (5) discussion concerning prospective businesses where no previous announcements have been made; Section 2.1-344 A (7) consultation with legal counsel pertaining to litigation; Roanoke County and American Management Technologies; Section 2.1-344 (7) consultation with legal counsel pertaining to probable litigation; involves collection for assessment of BPOL taxes with respect to Home Shopping Network; and Section 2.1-344 A (3) acquisition and sale of real properties for public purposes. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None IN RE: WORK SESSION (4T" FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM) 4:00 P.M., April 24, 2001 245 School Superintendent Dr. Weber, School Board Clerk Brenda Chastain, and School Finance Director Penny Hodge. Chairman Minnix welcome the School Board members and staff to the meeting. 1. Action to be taken by the School Board. ~ Request to adopt fiscal year 2001-2002 School budget. (Dr. Linda Weber, School Superintendent) Dr. Weber advised that the school budget included a 4% salary increase for teachers and administrators and a 5% increase for support staff and that the $650,000 deficit had been covered primarily by changes in nurses and class sizes. Supervisor Nickens advised that there was an error in the narration on page 5 of the second revision of the budget. Ms. Hodge advised that this would be corrected. Mr. Irvin moved to adopt the School Budget as presented. The motion was seconded by Ms. Roark, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Mr. Irvin, Mr. Leggette, Ms. Roark, Mr. Stovall NAYS: None ABSENT: Mr. Canada When Mr. Canada arrived at 5:18 p.m., he advised that he supported the adoption of the School's budget. 2. Actions to be taken by the Board of Supervisors ~ Request to adopt fiscal Xear 2001-2002 School budget. (Dr. Linda Weber, School Superintendent A-042402-4 April 24, 2001 247 1N RE: CLOSED MEETING The closed meeting was held from 5:30 p.m. until 6:50 p.m. IN RE: CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION R-042401-6 At 6:50 p.m., Supervisor Johnson moved to return to open session, and adopt the Certification Resolution. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None RESOLUTION 042401-6 CERTIFYING THE CLOSED MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened a closed meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such closed meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the closed meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the closed meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Certification Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None IN RE: WORK SESSION (4T" FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM) 1. County budget work session. May 8, 2001 249 Roanoke County Administration Center 5204 Bernard Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24018 May 8, 2001 The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at the Roanoke County Administration Center, this being the second Tuesday and the first regularly scheduled meeting of the month of May, 2001. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Minnix called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix, Vice-Chairman Joseph "Butch" Church, Supervisors Bob L. Johnson, Joseph McNamara, Harry C. Nickens MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator; Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney; Mary H. Allen, Clerk to the Board; John M. Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator; Dan R. O'Donnell, Assistant County Administrator; Kathi B. Scearce, Community Relations Director IN RE: OPENING CEREMONIES The invocation was given by the Reverend Samuel W. Crews, Coopers Cove Baptist Church. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited by all present. IN RE: REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS Mr. Hodge added Item D-3, presentation by General Services Director Anne Marie Green on the recently published Roanoke County Celebrate 2000 May 8, 2001 251 IN RE: BRIEFINGS 1. Briefing on Existing Business Survey. Dou las Chittum, Economic Development Director and Melinda Cox, Economic Development Specialist) The briefing was presented by Douglas Chittum and Melinda Cox. Ms. Cox reported that on May 4, 2001, the 2001 Existing Business Survey was mailed to 5,569 Roanoke County businesses. The purpose of the survey is to receive input on how Roanoke County might tailor its services to meet the current and future needs of the local business community. It also provides the opportunity for willing participants to partner with Economic Development staff in planning and implementing a comprehensive Existing Business Retention Program that will be responsive to the needs and concerns revealed in the survey results and the ensuing workshops to be held with the volunteer business partners. Economic Development Specialist Melinda Cox will be responsible for implementing the Existing Business Program. 2. Briefing on Leadership t~ to Portland, Maine. Elmer Hodge" Countv Administrator. Diane Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer, Lorraine Lange, Roanoke Countv Schools The briefing was presented by Elmer Hodge, Diane Hyatt and Lorraine Lange. Mr. Hodge reported that he, Ms. Hyatt, and Ms. Lange accompanied 40 other people to Portland, Maine to see what methods they have used to improve their neighborhoods and encourage economic development. Ms. Hyatt advised that representatives from Roanoke County, Roanoke City, and the Town of Vinton went to learn how Portland was turned into a technology center with a vibrant downtown area. They developed a program with "spiral email" to May 8, 2001 253 another eight acres which will last another six years, and the current bonds will be paid up in 2012. In response to questions from Supervisor McNamara, Mr. Hubbard advised there is $2.8 million in the reserve fund, and that there was no reduction in the tipping fees for commercial and private haulers because they do not have a contract with the Resource Authority similar to the one with that the City, County and Town has. In response to questions from Supervisor Johnson, Mr. Hubbard advised that there is $22 million in the Undesignated Fund Balance including all reserves, and that the landfill is comprised of 1200 acres. Supervisor Nickens moved to adopt the resolution approving the budget and that $300,000 savings be added to the County's budget to offset the current budget shortfall as requested in the County Administrator's comments. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None RESOLUTION 050801-1 APPROVING THE ROANOKE VALLEY RESOURCE AUTHORITY BUDGET FOR THE YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2002 WHEREAS, Section 5.9 of the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority Members Use Agreement provides that the Authority shall prepare and submit its operating budget for the forthcoming fiscal year to the Board of Supervisors of the County, the City Council of the City of Roanoke, and the Town Council of the Town of Vinton; and WHEREAS, by report dated March 28, 2001, a copy of which is on file in the office of the Clerk of the Board, the Chairman of the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority has submitted a request that the County approve the budget of the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority for the year ending June 30, 2002. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia that the budget for the year ending June 30, 2002 for the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority as set forth in the March 28, 2001, report of the Authority Chairman, a copy of which is incorporated by reference herein, is hereby APPROVED, and the County Administrator and the Clerk are authorized to execute and attest, respectively, on behalf of the County, any documentation, in form approved by the May 8, 2001 255 for Roanoke County. RVTV staff members are responsible for writing original scripts, videography, graphic design, and video editing. During the past year, video production at the studio has increased by 8%, the average hours of programming per month has increased by 13%, and closed captioning capabilities were added to the Board of Supervisors meetings. Ms. Simpson advised that the Roanoke Valley Cable Television Committee has approved the RVTV budget request of $269,616, of which Roanoke County's share is 40%, or $107,846, an increase of $6,806 over last year's budget. The total franchise fee paid by Cox to Roanoke County last year is $625,385 and 20% of that is $125,077 or $17,231 more than this budget request. Supervisor McNamara moved to approve the budget for Roanoke Valley Cable Television. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None 3. Request to expand the training opportunities for the Police Department. Ra Lavinder, Chief of Police This item was discussed in Closed Meeting and no action was taken. 4. Request to apply to the State for a Social Work Supervisor Position in the Department of Social Services. Bett McCraw, Director of Social Services A-050801-3 Dr. McCrary reported that this request is to seek permission from the State to employ a full time Social Work Supervisor effective July 1, 2001, and to increase the May 8, 2001 257 four floors. In a real emergency, people in the building would be at risk of serious injury. During the recent purchase of the Salem Bank and Trust Building, funding was included to address similar issues in that facility. The only other two story County building with public access is the Courthouse, which has an alarm system in place. Ms. Green advised that staff worked with a consultant to review the current Code and the fire alarm system at the Administration Center. The consultant designed a system which will address the deficiencies and bring the building up to Fire Code and ADA regulations. The fire marshal and building official have reviewed the plans and are in agreement with the design. The system was placed out to bid, and a bid opening was held on April 10. Including professional fees and a 10% contingency fund, the lowest responsible bid was $101,500, and funds are available in the capital fund unappropriated balance to cover this cost. Supervisor Church moved to appropriate $101,500 for the new fire alarm system for Roanoke County Administration Center. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None IN RE: FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES 1. First reading of ordinance ~propriating the funds for the fiscal year 2001-2002 budget. Brent Robertson, Budget Director Mr. Robertson reported that the 2001-02 fiscal year budget was presented to the Board on April 24, 2001. A public hearing is being held later during this meeting May 8, 2001 259 permitted activities and minimum standards for operations, and to rovide for appeals from denials, revocations or suspensions of permits. Jose h Obenshain, Sr. Assistant Counto Attorne Mr. Obenshain advised that this ordinance will authorize the establishment of an ambulance fee for service. The actual fee will be determined by resolution at a later date. Supervisor Nickens questioned the need for the detailed language in the first paragraph on Page 2 of the ordinance and felt that the ordinance did not need this level of specificity. Mr. Obenshain responded that the staff was trying to encapsulate the purpose of the ordinance but will change it for the second reading of the ordinance. Supervisor Church advised that many elderly are concerned that they will have to pay the fee even if they don't have insurance, that the County needs to make sure that no one will be denied, and that the procedure should require as little paperwork as possible. Supervisor Nickens moved to approve the first reading with paragraph 1, page 2 of the ordinance amended with less specific language by the second reading, and set the second reading and public hearing for May 22, 2001. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None 3. Ordinance amendina the Roanoke County Code ~ amending Section 21-73, General Prerequisites to grant of Division 3 Exemption for elderly and disabled persons of Chapter May 8, 2001 261 8 Facilities on the northwesterly side of Peters Creek Road on property known as the Public Safety Center owned ~ the Board of Supervisors and located in the Catawba Magisterial District. Anne Marie Green. General Services Director Ms. Green advised that Verizon-Virginia, Inc. has requested a 14 x 30 foot easement on the Public Safety Center property, Tax Map No. 37.10-1-21.2, to allow access to and installation of new fiber optic fed equipment that will provide facilities relief in the Peters Creek Road area. The new equipment will consist of two cabinets to be mounted on concrete pads with buried conduit running to the closest pole. Supervisor Church moved to approve the first reading and set the second reading for May 22, 2001. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None 5. First readina of an ordinance authorizing a lease agreement with Devon Mobile Communications, L.P. for use of the Goat Rock Water Tank for installation of a cellular antenna located in the Catawba Magisterial District. Ga Robertson, Utility Director Mr. Robertson reported that Devon Mobile Communications, L.P. has approached the Roanoke County Utility Department about the possibility of installing a cellular repeater antenna on the Goat Rock water tank. The Goat Rock water tank is located on the western side of "Big Hill" off Viewpoint Avenue. Devon Mobile Communications, L.P. has submitted a proposed lease agreement and an offer of May 8, 2001 263 R-050801-5; R-050801-5.d Supervisor Nickens moved to adopt the Consent Resolution. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None RESOLUTION 050801-5 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM I -CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for May 8, 2001, designated as Item I -Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 6, inclusive, as follows: 1. Confirmation of committee appointments to New Century Venture Center Board of Directors and Virginia's First Regional Industrial Facility Authority. 2. Acceptance of donation of a 20' sanitary sewer easement from Beverly M. Hite and William L. Hite. 3. Appropriation of $2,804.25 Valley Beautiful grant funds for landscaping of the grounds at the Blue Ridge Parkway Visitor Center. 4. Approval of resolution revising the membership and increasing the number of members of the Court-Community Corrections Regional Community Criminal Justice Board. 5. Request from Schools for acceptance of $32,688 Universal Service Fund grants for technology equipment. 6. Reimbursement for overtime expenditures for Roanoke County Narcotics Officer serving on the Drug Enforcement Administration Task Force. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the Consent Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None May 8, 2001 265 with the other participating jurisdictions, appoints the following persons to the Regional Criminal Justice Board for the terms of years set forth below. Each appointment shall be effective as of July 1, 2001. Because §53.1-183 provides that the Board's membership shall include persons who hold certain positions, this resolution sets out, beside the name of each person hereby appointed, a descriptive title for that person's position or occupation. Name and Title Term Mr. John Chambliss 3 Years Assistant County Administrator County of Roanoke Honorable Clifford R. Weckstein 2 Years Judge, Circuit Court Twenty-third Judicial Circuit Honorable Julian H. Raney, Jr. 1 Year Judge, General District Court Twenty-third Judicial District Honorable John B. Ferguson 1 Year Judge, Juvenile & Domestic Relations Court Twenty-third Judicial District James C. "Chris" Alderson, Esquire 2 Years Commonwealth Attorney Allegheny County/City of Covington Sheriff George McMillan 3 Years Roanoke City Sheriff's Office Sheriff Gerald Holt 2 Years Roanoke County Sheriff's Office Sheriff Ronnie Sprinkle 1 Year Botetourt County Sheriff's Office Sheriff C. E. "Butch" Simpson 2 Years Allegheny County Sheriff's Office Mr. John Higgins 3 Years Superintendent Rockbridge Regional Jail William H. Cleaveland, Esquire 3 Years Attorney-at-Law Roanoke, Virginia Chief Ray Lavinder 2 Years May 8, 2001 26'7 IN RE: CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS 1. Annie Krochalis expressed concern about the following: (1) several issues concerning the fee for service, including the amount of paperwork the volunteers will have to file under fee for service, assurance from the County that the additional staff will result in improvements in the rural areas, and the effect it will have on volunteer fund raising. (2) She reminded the Board that they still need improvements to the Bent Mountain Library. Supervisor McNamara asked Mr. Hodge to provide Ms. Krochalis with the report showing the plan for coverage with the additional fire and rescue staff. IN RE: REPORTS Supervisor Minnix moved to receive and file the following reports. The motion carried by a unanimous voice vote. 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Future School Capital Reserve 5. Resolution from the Commonwealth of Virginia recognizing Dr. Betty McCraw for hostin the Social Services state conference. 6. Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per investment and portfolio op IicX as of April 30' 2001. IN RE: REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS May 8, 2001 269 absence at the Visitor Center event because he attended his son's graduation. (2) He reported that he spoke at the Catawba Hospital volunteer and employee service recognition and thanked the Catawba staff for their outstanding service to the community. (3) He advised that his agency manager commended his service and work on the Board of Supervisors. Supervisor Minnix: He thanked everyone involved in the Visitor Center event; advised that Senator Warner and Secretary Norton were very gracious, but he felt that the TV coverage was disappointing. He emphasized that a debt of gratitude is owed to Supervisor Nickens for his vision of the future of Explore Park. The park has grown by leaps and bounds and he expressed appreciation to everyone who has been involved in the growth of Explore Park. IN RE: CLOSED MEETING At 5:30 p.m., Supervisor Minnix moved to go into Closed Meeting pursuant to Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (5) discussion concerning a prospective business or industry where no previous announcement has been made; 2.1-344A (7), consultation with legal counsel pertaining to specific legal matters, namely contract with Walmart; and contract with Cardinal Criminal Justice Academy; 2.1-344A (7) consultation with legal counsel concerning litigatioh, Bova v. Cox Communications. The motion carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None IN RE: WORK SESSIONS 1. Work session on commercial and rip vate stables. Dana May 8, 2001 27 The work session was held from 6:00 p.m. until 6:15 p.m., and was presented by Dana Lazzuri. Ms. Lazzuri advised that one of the economic development issues that has been discussed during the past several years has been retaining and recruiting young professionals to the Roanoke Valley. During a discussion with department directors, the question, "what can I do?" was asked of each director. The directors offered the following suggestions: (1) Change Mind Set; (2) Change Demographics; (3) Workforce Development; (4) Grow our own/tell our story; (5) Develop Strategic Partnerships Ms. Lazzuri explained that she was asked to chair a subcommittee to look at ways to market the Roanoke Valley to recent college graduates and to encourage those living in the Valley to remain here. A subcommittee was formed to gain more knowledge and determine what is necessary in order to successfully meet the 2001- 2002 goals. After several meetings the subcommittee developed several actions to meet the goals/suggestions from the department directors. Supervisor Nickens asked Mr. Hodge what Portland was doing to recruit and keep their young adults. Mr. Hodge advised that alumni groups in the Portland area e-mailed those who had left the community encouraging them to return. Supervisor McNamara suggested working with Tanglewood Mall to sponsor events in spaces that were not rented similar to First Fridays in downtown Roanoke. 3. Discussion on Colonial Avenue Corridor Study The work session was held from 6:15 p.m. until 6:30 p.m. The Board discussed with two area residents their concerns about a commercial rezoning request in the area which is currently zoned residential but was recommended to remain residential in the Colonial Avenue corridor study. They encouraged the Board not to IN RE: ADJOURNMENT May 8, 2001 273 At 7:06 p.m., Chairman Minnix adjourned the meeting May 10, 2001, at 12 noon at the Boxtree Lodge for the second regional leadership summit. Submitted by, Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board Approved by, H. Odell Minnix Chairman • ~ May 10, 2001 275 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke County Administration Center 5204 Bernard Drive S. W. Roanoke, Virginia 24018 January 8, 2001 The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, met this day at The Boxtree Lodge, Vinton, Virginia, this being the Second Greater Roanoke Valley Leadership Summit meeting, hosted by the County of Roanoke. IN RE: CALL TO ORDER Chairman Minnix called the meeting to order at 12:15 p.m. The roll call was taken. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix, Vice-Chairman Joseph B. "Butch" Church, Supervisors Bob L. Johnson, Harry C. Nickens MEMBERS ABSENT: Supervisor Joseph McNamara STAFF PRESENT: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator, Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney, Mary H. Allen, Clerk to the Board; Brenda Holton, Deputy Clerk, Diane Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer, John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator, Daniel O'Donnell, Assistant County Administrator, Kathi B. Scearce, Community Relations Director OTHERS PRESENT: City of Roanoke: The Honorable Ralph K. Smith, Mayor; The Honorable W. Alvin Hudson, The Honorable William D. Bestpitch, The Honorable Linda F. Wyatt, James D. Grisso, Director of Finance; William M. Hackworth, City Attorney; Stephanie Moon, Deputy Clerk; Chris Slone, Public Information Officer City of Salem The Honorable Carl E. Tarpley, Jr., Mayor; Forest G. Jones, City Manager Franklin County: Richard Huff, County Administrator • May 10, 2001 2.77 IN RE: INTRODUCTIONS Chairman Minnix recognized members of the House of Delegates C. Richard Cranwell and A. Victor Thomas. He also recognized Alison Baird, representing State Senator John Edwards and Jennifer Faulkner, representing Congressman Bob Goodlatte. The other participants introduced themselves. IN RE: DISCUSSION OF AGENDA ITEMS 1. Review of the Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) designation as a result of the recent census. (Wayne Strickland, Executive Director, Roanoke Valley-Alleghany Regional Commission) Mr. Strickland reported that the Metropolitan Area criteria is revised every ten years with each decennial census. In 1990, a MSA had to have at least one city with 50,000 or more inhabitants and a total metropolitan population of at least 100,000. Other criteria on commuting and populations density could include outlying counties. In 2000, a county will be included if 25% of its workforce commutes to the central city or counties, without consideration of population density. Additionally, MSA will become known as Core Based Statistical Areas (CBSA's). CBSA's will be defined as an area having at least 10,000 people including adjacent counties that have a high degree of social and economic integration with the core area as measured by commuting ties. It usually includes the urbanized area which is based on population. Mr. Strickland advised that the possible impact of a new CBSA standard for the Roanoke Metro area would be that Craig County and Franklin County may be included, May 10, 2001 279 that there is $60,000 allocated for this project and $350,000 will be received after July 1, 2001. 3. Report on possibility of bein.,g designated an Inland Port (Phil Sparks, Executive Director of the Roanoke Regional Economic Development Partnership) Mr. Sparks briefly reported thatthe Economic Development Partnership plans to make an announcement next week that will name the Roanoke Region as an Inland Port, which will result in many economic benefits for the region. 4. Discussion on development of a regional identity or "Branding". Chairman Minnix advised he would like to hear from the participants on how to best develop a regional identity. There was general discussion. Roanoke City Manager Darlene Burcham pointed out that one of the values of a regional identity would be to create a strong legislative agenda. Supervisor Minnix added that if the region had the strength of all the cities, counties and towns working together, they could compete effectively with other large metropolitan areas such as Northern Virginia and Tidewater, both in economic development pursuits and lobbying the General Assembly. Supervisor Johnson recommended that the region accomplish something concrete. He suggested working as a region on the biomedical facility that will be located in Roanoke City because the "spin off' from this business would help all localities. Council member Wyatt suggested that the region look at the rest of the world A-062601-7 . a ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~~" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 26, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION At the June 12, 2001 meeting, the following nomination was made. 1. Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Supervisor Nickens nominated Bob G. Semones, to represent the Vinton Magisterial District for another three-year term which will expire June 30, 2004. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the above appointment be confirmed. Submitted by: Approved by, 1 Mary H. Allen CMC Elmer C. Hodge Clerk to the Board County Administrator ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson to approve Church _ x _ Denied () Johnson _ x Received () McNamara- x _ Referred () Minnix _ x To () Nickens _ x _ cc: File Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission File A-062601-7. b ACTION # ITEM NUMBER -~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 26, 2001 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Water and Sewer Facilities Serving Waterford, Section 7 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Recommend approval SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Developers of Waterford, Section 7, Strauss Construction Corporation, have requested that Roanoke County accept the Deed conveying the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the subdivision along with all necessary easements. The water and sanitary sewer facilities are installed, as shown on plans prepared by Lumsden and Associates entitled Waterford, Section 7, which are on file in the Community Development Department. The water and sanitary sewer facility construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County. FISCAL IMPACT: The value of the water and sanitary sewer construction is $21,670.00 and $32,000.00 respectively. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the Waterford, Section 7 subdivision along with all necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities. ..~~_ .~ SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: Gary Robert on, P.E. Elmer C. Hodge Utility Direct r County Administrator ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson to approve Church ~ x _ Denied () Johnson _ x Received () McNamara- x _ Referred () Minnix _ x ._ To () Nickens _ x cc: File Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development ,._./ -,~ Return To: Roanoke County Attorney's Office THIS CHATTEL DEED, made this 12 day of March , 20 01 , by and between: Strauss Construction Corporation , an individual, hereinafter referred to as the "Developer," parry of the first part; and the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGIl~TIA, its successors or assigns, hereinafter referred to as the "Board," party of the second part. WITNESSETH: THAT FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual benefits accruing to the parties, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Developer does hereby GRANT, CONVEY, ASSIGN AND TRANSFER, with the covenants of GENERAL WARRANTY OF TITLE, in fee simple unto the Board all water and/or sewer lines, valves, fittings, laterals, connections, storage facilities, sources of water supply, pumps, manholes and any and all other equipment and appurtenances thereunto belonging, in and to the water and/or sewer systems in the streets, avenues, public utility, easement areas, water and sewer easement areas that have been or may hereafter be installed by the Developer, along with the right to perpetually use and occupy the easements in which the same may be located, all of which is more particularly shown, described and designated as follows, to wit: As shown on the plan entitled, Development Plans for Section No. 7 Waterford ,made by Lumsden & Associates, and on file in the Roanoke County Department of Community Development. 1 ~° The Developer does hereby covenant and warrant that it will be responsible for the proper installation and construction of the said water and/or sewer systems including repair of surface areas affected by settlement of utility trenches for a period of one (1) year after date of acceptance by the Board and will perform any necessary repairs at its cost. Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby joins in the execution of this instrument to signify the acceptance of this conveyance pursuant to Resolution No. adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, on the day of , 20 2 '~_ WITNESS THE FOLLOWING signatures and seals: Developer: Address: By As Title State of: Vi~inia ' City of: Roanoke , to wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this: ~~t ~ da o~' ~ 20 01 y ~~~ By: /-% x~~~~~ Its President % Steven S~ t~ uss Title on behalf of: Strauss Construction Corporation t~v~tuy i uvli~ My Commission expires: December 31 2004 3 Strauss Construction Corporation PO Box 20287 Approved as to form: County Attorney State of: County/City of: By: Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Virginia Roanoke , to wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this: (SEAL) day of 20 by Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator, on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. Notary Public My Commission expires: 4 , :, j:% ~~_ '~\~ `` ~ 9 r~ '/9 \~~2F1 SITE ,' 11 ,~o ,v ;1; ~~ wPl ~ , -~, tiT 7-~T r~r q,~ ~, Y 1 'C11 Y ~.t ~ ,LYl~~ - -a~ ti° n^ ?s N n ?6 v ~ ~ ~/ f. 9R. Yy ^~ ~~\ ' zj F d ti /~ \~ n°' k ?B re~~ ~ / ~ •XryF i s5yy p j Mer` .. •,, ~~/ r9r 6 2 F~y~•'o °j'p 6 8 ~NvE( 111 NL A.4. e1 'Bi r!S Bo 4 6 0 5 S ~. \ p: 5' yet,-: . ~ ~ '_' 111... 'IBuv ,! `,\ _ 1X91 ¢q U ~~!-_l--_ _- ' i '\ \4 Bi GY ~1'e rAL rF ~.T X ~L .. L ~` ,~ AEMA~PIrAY e( - - gEPN E j,.v.4,ugj4', ~Q'f L \ - f^ sEf NOfG r''`C0I 0° 'I '~ ~!~ P y • ~_ -~+ Y a, 1 \ s`9 ~~ oif Fp y ' 3 wlo.ea ~/ ~ ~Ap G` i'6, 9~6• ~6 s Q' >f ceF M' Aa TN G9 G [ql.E ~ ~ s,GOl c r4•z ~~ ~~ E pGh b) ~, ` n"~ , 4 ~q rE ^ F 11 ~ ~ ` ~-~ 6 Water ~ ? \ - / ~ \ Y o ~c° "tea ^ / ~~ ~A> ^h, ?? \ ~ ~~ ' ~ 8" Sanitary Sewer ~~' / ~9 ~ SCAR `° " 4ALIG WfASEMENE ~ Sq4. 5E E~ ~'r Oi9'\ ) f8 \ 3f6 ,~ - Luq .e ~ '38 ~v 1F Fc p ~ \ O /L~ A, e" >~ t _ _ \ _ ~ 3~ {AN SENEW E~EMBui ~\ ~ _.">_.rr '12e"1 z 85' ~ -131 9 4 u o.a - .~\ '^ nreG, vlr(+en.m "'~ q Wd-ATi@ 5 -WYE-OU]OF M.Y 40.,4=N' L.O.. V` f' Ai' 4.0..4;5' A. n: P' 11 ~~ 8 Water r ~ a NN \ ~ IE Z ` ~ \\ A''lr Ck• x m E'e B'z a"1E / (RIB" bA IE YA VE5 ~- 8 55MN + IDr Ia. IB. 04 ~ / ~-wrp L:o. Cf. ~ ~: 6' ~e L.a., L6 D. F, t~ '-? ~ > ~ \1. ~ s ., o 219°.°v °"' °` \. A~\. oF. ~ ~-~1 4A ~,-c~ B ~\ 7G" ! \ E ~~° * ~'" "Zr'~L9 ~ -~ 8" Sanitary Sewer \'. ~ e fig:. -°4• c~ ~ n' 9 !0 ~' I e w a 7rza'mE C~ AYaS~ ~ \ y~9. \'' \ \ c\a. \ 4., • i~~ 9 m .L: Pf' L.O., <=a' S°l \ s g N .4~~~{ ie ~__ ~ n . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ EklSt 4A5 41NEPEASEMENf~~~ ~ a . _ -_ _. _- (rYAr_A __ _ _. _.__ ~ - __ __ FRI{I A" __.. _ ~- 5= ~_ _~- 5 ~Yr51 B' EX15f 55MN ~ i EIM! r5' SANr]A¢Y SfWEW EASEMEN/ ' / 7A of ?5. f0~4~! ~®~~~ ~~~,~,~, WATERFORD, SECTION 7 U'Y'TLTTY ~EP~.R'Tli~ElvT Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer facilities ~., . i -- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 26, 2001 RESOLUTION 062601-7.c REQUESTING THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, OFFICE OF EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES, TO DELAY IMPLEMENTATION OF NEW EMS REGULATIONS UNTIL JANUARY 1, 2003 WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Health, Office of Emergency Medical Services, (EMS), is in the process of revising the Virginia EMS Regulations; and WHEREAS, Version 2 of the draft regulations consists of six parts and nearly 300 pages of text, and Version 3 is to be released soon; and WHEREAS, the Virginia Office of EMS has advised that the new regulations shall be effective as of January 1, 2002; and WHEREAS, it is the responsibility of county and local governments to provide emergency medical services to its citizens; and WHEREAS, many of the proposed rules and regulations are more applicable to urban areas that have more resources from which to draw and are often more compact geographic areas; and WHEREAS, small and rural jurisdictions may be unaware of the changes proposed in the newest version of the draft regulations and may not have sufficient time to address the required changes and any budgetary adjustments by January 1, 2002. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia as follows: 1. That the Board appreciates the efforts by the Virginia Office of EMS to keep emergency medical services systems modern, effective and efficient; and. 1 i. . 2. That the Board joins the Virginia Association of Counties in requesting the Virginia Department of EMS to delay the implementation of the new EMS regulations until January 1, 2003, to allow adequate time for all localities to prepare for any financial implications as a result of the new regulations. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Hol n, CMC Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Richard E. Burch, Jr., Chief, Fire & Rescue Jim Campbell, Executive Director, Virginia Association of Counties Virginia Department of Health, Office of Emergency Medical Services 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~'~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: June 26, 2001 Resolution requesting the Virginia Department of Health, Office of Emergency Medical Services, (EMS) to delay implementation of new EMS Regulations until January 1, 2003. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Recommend approval BACKGROUND: The Virginia Department of Health, Office of Emergency Medical Services is the regulating agency for all rescue squads, ambulance services and fire and rescue departments that provide emergency medical services (EMS) in the Commonwealth of Virginia. The current Rules & Regulations were issued in 1990 and the new revised Rules & Regulations are anticipated to take effect January 1, 2002. The new Rules & Regulations can place financial hardships on some localities if the implementation time is not extended to allow jurisdictions to adequately prepare for purchasing new equipment to meet the standards. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Fire & Rescue Department considers the new regulations to be an important step in improving pre-hospital care for the Commonwealth but fears that all required regulations cannot be met in the specified time. Through prolonging the implementation period by an extra year will allow the local rescue squads and our Department to adhere to the new regulations with minimal burdens FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact is not completely known at this time since the Rules & Regulations are still in a draft format. ...~- ~/ STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt the attached resolution supporting the Virginia Association of Counties' Board of Directors request that the implementation of the new Rules & Regulations be delayed until January 1, 2003. This will allow localities to adequately prepare for the new Rules and Regulations issued by the Virginia Department of Health, Office of Emergency Medical Services. Submitted by, Approved by, ~~ Richard E. Burch, Jr. Elmer C. Hodge Chief, Fire and Rescue County Administrator ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved () Motion by: Church_ _ _ _ Denied () Johnson _ Received () McNamara _ _ _ Referred () Minnix To () Nickens cc: File AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 26, 2001 RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, OFFICE OF EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES, TO DELAY IMPLEMENTATION OF NEW EMS REGULATIONS UNTIL JANUARY 1, 2003 WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Health, Office of Emergency Medical Services, (EMS), is in the process of revising the Virginia EMS Regulations; and WHEREAS, Version 2 of the draft regulations consists of six parts and nearly 300 pages of text, and Version 3 is to be released soon; and WHEREAS, the Virginia Office of EMS has advised that the new regulations shall be effective as of January 1, 2002; and WHEREAS, it is the responsibility of county and local governments to provide emergency medical services to its citizens; and WHEREAS, many of the proposed rules and regulations are more applicable to urban areas that have more resources from which to draw and are often more compact geographic areas; and WHEREAS, small and rural jurisdictions may be unaware of the changes proposed in the newest version of the draft regulations and may not have sufficient time to address the required changes and any budgetary adjustments by January 1, 2002. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia as follows: 1. That the Board appreciates the efforts by the Virginia Office of EMS to keep emergency medical services systems modern, effective and efficient; and. 1 ~! ~~ 2. That the Board joins the Virginia Association of Counties in requesting the Virginia Department of EMS to delay the implementation of the new EMS regulations until January 1, 2003, to allow adequate time for all localities to prepare for any financial implications as a result of the new regulations. 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY JUNE 26, 2000 RESOLUTION 062601-7.d ESTABLISHING SALARIES FOR THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AND THE COUNTY ATTORNEY WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby establishes the salaries for the County Administrator and the County Attorney for Fiscal Year 2000-2001. BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the annual salary for the County Administrator shall be increased from $119,128.47 to $123,893.61. 2. That the annual salary for the County Attorney shall be increased from $101,433.91 to $105,491.27. 3. That the effective date for the establishment of these salariES shall be July 1, 2000. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Hol n, CMC Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Diane D. Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer Danial Morris, Director, Finance Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Joe Sgroi, Director, Human Resources Action No. ~. Item No. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 26, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING SALARIES FOR THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AND THE COUNTY ATTORNEY SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Each year the County Administrator and the County Attorney receive annual evaluations conducted by the Board of Supervisors. The attached resolution establishes the salaries for the County Administrator and the County Attorney for the upcoming fiscal year. Respectfully submitted, ~~r~~.r~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Vote No Yes Church Johnson McNamara Minnix Nickens Abs U:\W PDOCS\AGENDA\GENERAL\SALARY.INC ~~ i `~,.. ` ~1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY JUNE 26, 2001 RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING SALARIES FOR THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AND THE COUNTY ATTORNEY WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby establishes the salaries for the County Administrator and the County Attorney for Fiscal Year 2001-2002. BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the annual salary for the County Administrator shall be increased from $119.128.47 to $123,893.61. 2. That the annual salary for the County Attorney shall be increased from $101.433.91 to $105.491.27. 3. That the effective date for the establishment of these salaries shall be July 1, 2001. U:\W PDOCS\AGENDA\GENERAL\SALARY.wpd _.: ~" AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 26, 2001 RESOLUTION 062601-7.e ENDORSING THE BLUE RIDGE-SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA FILM OFFICE, INC. AS THE OFFICIALLY SANCTIONED AGENCY TO RECRUIT FILM PRODUCTION IN SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA WHEREAS, The Blue Ridge-Southwest Virginia Film Office was organized on August 3, 2000 for the purpose of recruiting and attracting film production in Southwest Virginia; and WHEREAS, the production of television, movies and commercials in Southwest Virginia exposes to the rest of the world, the scenic beauty and history of this section of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and serves as an economic boost to the entire region; and WHEREAS, in order to be sanctioned by the Virginia Film Office, a division of the Virginia Economic Development Partnership, the Blue Ridge-Southwest Virginia Film Office must receive the endorsement of the localities it represents. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: (1) That the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, hereby endorses the Blue Ridge-Southwest Virginia Film Office as the officially sanctioned film office to represent Southwest Virginia; and (2) That copies of this resolution be forwarded to the Virginia Film Office and the Blue Ridge-Southwest Virginia Film Office. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None 1 A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Holto , CMC Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Rita D. McClenny, Virginia Film Office, Richmond, VA Bootie Chewning, President, Blue Ridge-Southwest Virginia Film Office Sandra Eubank, Vice-President, Blue Ridge-Southwest Virginia Film Office 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~~ ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 26, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: Endorsement of the Blue Ridge-Southwest Virginia Film Office, Inc. as the official agency with the Virginia Film Office to recruit movie and television film production in Southwest Virginia COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Recommend approval BACKGROUND: On August 3, 2000, the Blue Ridge-Southwest Virginia Film Office held its organizational meeting in the Vinton War Memorial. The purpose of the organization is to recruit and encourage film production in Southwest Virginia. Their vision and mission statement is attached. The organizers of this office are Barbara "Bootie" Chewning from Vinton and Sandra Eubank of Roanoke County, both long-time residents of the Roanoke Valley who are active in the area theater. In early 2001, another film office was established; and at this time, there are currently two organizations functioning in Southwest Virginia. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: In order to be sanctioned by the Virginia Film Office as an official state film office, the Blue Ridge-Southwest Virginia Film Office must receive the endorsement of the localities it represents. The Blue Ridge-Southwest Virginia Film Office is requesting the endorsement of the Board of Supervisors to serve as the official film office for Southwest Virginia. They are also contacting other localities that would be served by the film office requesting their support. They have already received the endorsement of the City of Covington. RVTV Station Manager Elaine Simpson and County Treasurer Alfred Anderson serve on the Advisory Board for the Blue Ridge-Southwest Virginia Film Office. They both spoke highly of the professionalism of the individuals involved in this film office, and recommend that the Board support them as the sanctioned agency with the Virginia Film Office. ~j , ~~CICP ~~,~I~- ~r%~!F~f ~~~G7"~,l,Cl, ~~m l'%~!/~~i ~nc ___. ~, ~ - VISION: Our vision is to serve as a viable network for development of film production within the Southwestern and Far Western regions of Virginia. Our staff will serve as liaisons between regional governments, residents, corporations and the film industry. Through rejuvenation and expansion of the film production industry in our region, we can increase the economic benefits and improve the cultural climate for every inhabitant in our area. Through a unified effort among the Regional Governments, Chamber of Commerce, and Community Leaders, we can develop our area into a filmmaking hub that will in time become an economic beacon that will symbolically shine as bright as the Mill Mountain Star. MISSION STATEMENT: Blue Ridge-Southwest Virginia Film Office's mission is: ...To open communications with film company producers and directors who have utilized our region in the past, as well as, contact and open dialogue between our office and new production companies. ...We will create an environment of cooperation that will attract television, film, video and commercial productions while at the same time, nurture our regionally based film and media production companies. Blue Ridge-Southwest Virginia Film Office, Inc. 2828 Emissary Drive NW Roanoke, Virginia 24019 Bootie Bell Chewning, President (540) 342.4171 (Cell) (540) 520-7541Email:B00 TEEna,msn.com Sandra R. Eubank, Vice President (540) 562-4315 (Car) (540) 309-7555 Email: SandraEubank(a~cs.com _ _~. Mayor Doneld rw, Ddvia 1 V W ~ Vi~~ V ! l~l [~(Ji~l ` iii ~~ ruDnll~ >nrwt VfNTON, VIR(31N1A 24179-2531 PHONE (SW) 8$3.0607 FqX (510) 9a3-0d21 June 7, 2()41 Ms. Rita ll. McCletuiy Virginia Film Dflice Riverfront Plaza 901 ~. Byrd Street Richmond, VA 23219 Dear Ms. McCienny: `~'` - ~ Council Mombenf Rvt)ert R. Altipa Bradley E. Grose WiUisrn E, obenchaln, Jr. Thomas A. Rotenbersy This letter is written in regard to the Blue Ridge Southwest Virginia Film Office. The Vinton Town Council recognizes and supports the Rluc Ridge Southwest Virginia Film Of~'ice as a fine ofi"ice that is working diligently to bring film production to our area. We believe that the Btue Ridge Southwest Virginia I~'ilrn Uttice will promote quality entertainment that will bcnctlt the entire Koanoke Valley. The principal officers, Bnotic C;hewning and Sandra Eubank, are to be commended for their ~ie3ication aad ~fforis tc bring tslm production to the Roanoke Valley area. Sincerely, V1N~1'UN '1'UWN G'OUNCIL Vim../ ~' V~b~ ~v~~J`"~_.- ncm~lEd T., navis Mayor ~ - AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 26, 2001 RESOLUTION ENDORSING THE BLUE RIDGE-SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA FILM OFFICE, INC. AS THE OFFICIALLY SANCTIONED AGENCY TO RECRUIT FILM PRODUCTION IN SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA WHEREAS, The Blue Ridge-Southwest Virginia Film Office was organized on August 3, 2000 for the purpose of recruiting and attracting film production in Southwest Virginia; and WHEREAS, the production of television, movies and commercials in Southwest Virginia exposes to the rest of the world, the scenic beauty and history of this section of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and serves as an economic boost to the entire region; and WHEREAS, in order to be sanctioned by the Virginia Film Office, a division of the Virginia Economic Development Partnership, the Blue Ridge-Southwest Virginia Film Office must receive the endorsement of the localities it represents. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: (1) That the Board of Supervisors of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, hereby endorses the Blue Ridge-Southwest Virginia Film Office as the officially sanctioned film office to represent Southwest Virginia; and (2) That copies of this resolution be forwarded to the Virginia Film Office and the Blue Ridge-Southwest Virginia Film Office. A-062601-7.f ACTION # ITEM NUMBER ~T' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 26, 2001 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Water and Sewer Facilities Serving Brookfield, Section 1 and Section 2 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Recommend approval SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Developers of Brookfield, Section 1 and Section 2, Fralin & Waldron, Inc., have requested that Roanoke County accept the Deed conveying the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the subdivision along with all necessary easements. The water and sanitary sewer facilities are installed, as shown on plans prepared by Lang Engineering entitled Brookfield, Section 1 and Section 2, which are on file in the Community Development Department. The water and sanitary sewer facility construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County. FISCAL IMPACT: The value of the water and sanitary sewer construction is $134,454.00 and $164,816.00 respectively. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the Brookfield Section 1 and Section 2 subdivision along with all necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities. ~- ~ SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: Gary Robertso , P.E. Elmer C. Hodge Utility Director County Administrator ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson to approve Church _ x _ Denied () Johnson _ x _ Received () McNamara- x _ Referred () Minnix _ x _ To () Nickens _ x _ cc: File Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development COPY S- ~ Return To: Roanoke County Attorney's Office THIS CHATTEL DEED, made this ~1- day of Mav , 2001, by and between Fralin and Waldron, Inc. , a Virginia Corporation, hereinafter referred to as the "Developer," party of the first part; and the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, its successors or assigns, hereinafter referred to as the "Board," party of the second part. WITNESSETH: THAT FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual benefits accruing to the parties, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Developer does hereby GRANT, CONVEY, ASSIGN AND TRANSFER, with the covenants of GENERAL WARRANTY OF TITLE, in fee simple unto the Board all water and/or sewer lines, valves, fittings, laterals, connections, storage facilities, sources of water supply, pumps, manholes and any and all other equipment and appurtenances thereunto belonging, in and to the water and/or sewer systems in the streets, avenues, public utility, easement areas, water and sewer easement areas that have been or may hereafter be installed by the Developer, along with the right to perpetually use and occupy the easements in which the same maybe located, all of which is more particularly shown, described and designated as follows, to wit: `~ As shown on the plan entitled Brookfield,.~~PCtinn 1 , made by Lang Engineering .om~any and on file in the Roanoke County Department of Community Development. The Developer does hereby covenant and warrant that it will be responsible for the proper installation and construction of the said water and/or sewer systems including repair of surface areas affected by settlement of utility trenches for a period of one (1) year after date of acceptance by the Board and will preform any necessary repairs at its cost. Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby joins in the execution of this instrument to signify the acceptance of this conveyance pursuant to Resolution No adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, on the day of , 20 2 ~~ WITNESS THE FOLLOWING signatures and seals: Developer Address: By: As State of: Virginia , County/~i~of: Roanoke , to wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this: Tt'V~- ,day of , 20~_, By: ~r~d~Etti C. K~r~erbrs~~c~ Its `~p~~sic~~v~~ Duly authorized officer (typed name) Title on behalf of: ~ ~ - ~1'tn ~'-'lt-i~~--~ ,-_~~e P E~ 4T- . ,e~ 9fi P ~~ t~(1 /A ~( Notary P>~lic My Commission expires: ee u ~ .~ m e ,~ _ President Title .. ~~ Approved as to form: County Attorney State of: County/City of: EAL) Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia By: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Virginia ' Roanoke , to wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this: day of , 20 by Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator, on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. Notary Public My Commission expires: 4 ..T- 7 COPY Return To: Roanoke County Attorney's Office THIS CHATTEL DEED, made this ~1- day of May , 2001, by and between Fralin and Waldron, Inc. , a Virginia Corporation, hereinafter referred to as the "Developer," party of the first part; and the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGIl~TIA, its successors or assigns, hereinafter referred to as the "Board," party of the second part. WITNES SETH: THAT FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual benefits accruing to the parties, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Developer does hereby GRANT, CONVEY, ASSIGN AND TRANSFER, with the covenants of GENERAL WARRANTY OF TITLE, in fee simple unto the Board all water and/or sewer lines, valves, fittings, laterals, connections, storage facilities, sources of water supply, pumps, manholes and any and all other equipment and appurtenances thereunto belonging, in and to the water and/or sewer systems in the streets, avenues, public utility, easement areas, water and sewer easement areas that have been or may hereafter be installed by the Developer, along with the right to perpetually use and occupy the easements in which the same maybe located, all of which is more particularly shown, described and designated as follows, to wit: As shown on the plan entitled Brookfield..~~P~tinn 2 , made by ang Engineering om}~any and on file in the Roanoke County Department of Community Development. The Developer does hereby covenant and warrant that it will be responsible for the proper installation and construction of the said water and/or sewer systems including repair of surface areas affected by settlement of utility trenches for a period of one (1) year after date of acceptance by the Board and will preform any necessary repairs at its cost. Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby joins in the execution of this instrument to signify the acceptance of this conveyance pursuant to Resolution No. adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, on the day of , 2D 2 ... ~-- ~ WITNESS THE FOLLOWING signatures and seals: Developer: Address: By: As State o£ Virginia , County/.€~ of: Roanoke , to wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this: ~~ ,day of ~ , 20~-~----~ By: A~ndwt~ C \L~1~:th~u~~ Its ~~~~~~t Duly authorized officer (typed name) Title on behalf of: Notary My Commission expires: r'~n r~-r~~.~ s ~~,*~4 Y~ ~ ~ 1 f,f-I ~~ 'z ,.+r I . ter, ~~:° ~ :,~~, :. ;~ ~~~-'' .~ :v ~F ,~ "- ~.-~~ ;~~ . c~~~?~*~~~~ BAR ~~ ~ a~~~ 3 Title `".. ~""~ t Approved as to form: Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia County Attorney By: (SEAL) Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator State of: Virginia ' County/City of: Roanoke , to wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this: day of ~ 20 by Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator, on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. Notary Public My Commission expires: 4 ~- - l I N 18'41'2 $~~ WATER .:Ec~ ~'~ I y 174.1 .36 -- ~- j1i...~ ; 0 N ~ ~ c~ N ''? ~ ~ /~o :~ o ~ ~ j . ~.S-E ~ "e' ~ C~N4. U 8" SANITARY SEWER --~ ~ tD ltJ ( 1i _, n DI a y~Im r~CV O~ m ~ ~ w ~ ~ • ? m N ~ r- _ __ O c ~a 4^ " WATER ' z ~ 3:o_a,~' ? -20' PU.E.-^ - 87.27 0 -' x--12 „B:aa 95.J6 . ~ ~ •,y,•p~TI .OS 3AIN4 AR'3ti.LS x3TT~'!~. ~ r 4 - ao.633. b ~ M N N -•_- o 97 90.00 _ .., ~__ Z . ~-°Z ~- a, . 29.6a 35. N.B.L I {t !. d. -1 _ __ - - ~ __ ~-- \ , m . __ O I d y ~ o U ~~ ~ ~ ~ p7t WATER o '21` v ~ °! ~~~' ` '~! N 7e at E ", ~ _ o~ Ion _ ,w, i S rod 7 I CD o ~ 4121".WI ,a. ~ ~ c mr ~~wP,TER { ~ 2 ~ ~ y ~ g ! f`I ^ N t. BS : I ~.] pO~ O O 1 N t =~ a i d y -, u ~~ t N w t~rn w 1 r a JWa ~ ~o y- 7 ~~ N 76'41'21" E ~ M~ 0~7, / ip ., I .ZaZ l.BF! ~ 1 ~ N ^[~\t~ m~.~ ry 9 1063.67 ~ i . "~~<< N <<<8 `^ 5 78'41'25` lW~ ° y y u !, ~ / 122.65 ? rn l i O• ~ I I N 79'at'2'•" E ~ d, o ~~~ ~ ~ I 176.44 '~ 'o ~ / N P~yO IN poi ' ~O~ ~- VN J ~ .." ~ ~-' ~I C 1 ' ti . 78'47"21" E r 5 78'41'21" W, N ` 192.52 a 1 ~ w ~ 73586 I I I '~ ~ ~ m ~ Pi iO O ~ o ~ N ' c~ oCiS cv^~ 'o ml m iK1 N 7B' '''a7 7" E ~ l ~ r '• I ' 2.i '78 ar ¢7 t- c N ~ m .. ~a~ I g 78'41'21" W : , o~ ~ ~~ g' SANITARY SEWER . . 748.30 I o°' 4 ^, N 78'41"25 t o 40= W m 0. i " i~ c~ tza1= 0 232.81 ~. S ~ ~ I~ ~ i s [I`ll f ~ 4 ~ 3 H ^S 78.47'27° W ~,n ~`''~~ = ~ d• ~ m m ~ 159.61 ro ' ~;~ N 7B'41'2l" E 255.oa m ~A: t N 527° ~ F ,H Z °m cc ,°, ~, c11 ° i ~- 202.25 -~ N r pp I ..`. '3. `` O h J "'^ y !n !~ 1 ~tl , N ~ ~ ~ ,pt ~ yl l ' ' a 0.n ~ O .. h m i o 45 S 68'1 raj 1 8 G2 \` `\' n_. N f o ~r \ J ~ '. C ryh ~2 p~ ~ V4i~''J pQ) Q, 7 ~ ~ ~ h ~ ~ _ ~ h ~ ~ ~ a'°..- . p~, `5 \ •~'• - v `n row O•. ~' Q„ n ca rn ~ O~ '' ~ J 1 ~ ~N ' ~$n 7$ d' O ta. ~. ROB®~ ~O~JN'I,~' BROOKFIELD, SECTION 1 TJ'EILI'Y'~:' ~E~ ~R'I"1VIEI°~T Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer facilities P~..-_ P+ PtTe.et2 P L 4 e ~L ~O AFIELD 9g. =,po t? ~p Tj/ jT r~-~I }fib/T frb TyQr ~//r ~.J }' i 'L, ~:i T 1 ~i ~L71~1 f t '~j -T 7 NORTH. Q~ ~ S _~ a ._ 1 r i ~x ~• ~, r ~ ~ M N i~ `~ '°~ ~ n i ~. n =~._ ~~ `; j~T o~ ~ 2 n ~ ~~n ~ M ~ 8" WATER n, a `H `5 b ~J 6d e ~~ h 1~ J^ ~ O eE~ 's~joz... _.Coz~ ~ti .~, pg~ .- ra .,~ p1 k /~, , - Zn2 8" SANITARY SEWER % pp' $- I ~ ~=yoo ~~0`~/59 W CXU¢ ~-N m\ i5 i W G~>^a k~ /q-~ot~ • ~pW~~~ ~\~i y¢jC4 W 1 a~W<mz \ i r¢x3~Q \ ~ ~~ OW~4SD ° 2U~Cn¢ wO^ ~~q ~~~ .~ a\~ ;r,VZm°~ ~Y~ UCOG^~~9 y ~ C a ~ ~V~~~s~ °z~~a-, i w C a A^ n rC.. ¢i~ 1946 v~~l°o'~S ,Y ~ 1 M ^~ ~, K1 ., c6 .NITARY SEWER ;~ - i ~y/~ h ~ o cc^,. '_ S~ 4 „~ Zip 9!~ ~ o .O ,,{~~ 3.~ rye. ~~n. ~., ~~~ v'n5' ~p•'4 g2 ",~ h ro ~ n ~ ~. ~ ~ _ 'mot ~_ ~ ~ , y E p,op~ '~ ~:o h ~ ~,\ s Y I p'v.,~ 7~' g5.0~~.',om 2~°?~t° ~ ,try R o p' pf' 71 Q~~ g g5.~, %o=~) p~ ~N 9550' (29.50' ~ '.:: ~(,,~~7 ~ `c~~ "~n 'y ~ 725.00 °--58459'19 '1T O ~ • ''J o ^~ ~ (toialj ~ "~ f ,~~";=' - o C ,~''h ~ ~ ~ ~ ;~ ; 8" WATER ~ h ; I ~ 'o 2'n ~° ,-- ,E ~° 'n .mom p a°N e ° 6p 4 " ~ ~o ncoN i . Y ~~ `r'~.xi7~ :7 ~ ~`-, ~°rg'. ~ X196' ~ ~~ a oc:.~~~~c ,~,. ~ ~ ` lea zocvna~rnn F''`3o ~x rn ~~ ° ~ 04 = '° m s ~ 6 ~ ~ ~ ... ~ y E. E. ' p' .°t. yi, 9 p N 9 ~~ ~~ ~ ,NS ray ~0,i o ss`ro" :~~~ w 'h _1ri 1~ ~. V , ~.~, N~ i $ O ,O~ ~ w ~ . ~ T S.E - cp ~ (O -129.18' ~ t '=~ L°~~' - `ti ~` ~ 1 ~ c~ ~ r~ k i ~ ~ ~f~ ~ ~ IZOANOI~E CO~T'I'I' ~T7CILITY D~I~~iI2.T11~ENT BROOKFIELD, SECTION 2 Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer facilities s, i ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER ~"~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 26, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: Request for work session on the Colonial Avenue Road project. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Recommend approval SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The staff of the Department of Community Development and the Virginia Department of Transportation are requesting a work session with the Board of Supervisors for July 10, 2001 to present the preliminary construction plans for the Colonial Avenue Road project. The Colonial Avenue (Route 720) project length is .53 miles. The project begins at the intersection of Penn Forest Blvd. (Route 687) and terminates at Electric Road (Route 419). This project is identified as priority # 4 on Roanoke County's Six Year Secondary System Construction Plan for Fiscal Years 2001-2007. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff is requesting the Board of Supervisors hold a work session on July 10, 2001. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: I l / rno Covey, Director Elmer C. Hodge Department of Commun' y Development County Administrator 1 4 i • ~ ~ ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved () Motion by: Church _ _ Denied () Johnson Received () McNamara- Referred () Minnix To () Nickens _ _ _ Item No. /~"~ - Z AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, 5204 BERNARD DRIVE, SW., ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: June 26, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Work Session Regarding Establishing an Environmental Management System for Roanoke County's Operations. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: This is an excellent effort on behalf of the County similar to accreditation of the Police Department, schools, and private industry. It is a statement of the County's standard of excellence from this point into the future. In the process of preparing for this study, staff did not find any existing issues that the County needs to address. BACKGROUND In February 2001 four County staff people including Assistant County Administrator Dan O'Donnell, General Service Director Anne Marie Green, Assistant County Attorney Vickie Huffman and Risk Manager Bob Jernigan attended a conference to learn about ISO 14001 Environmental Management System requirements and benefits. ISO 14001 is a worldwide environmental standard that ensures organizations are meeting their responsibilities under existing environmental laws and regulations. Subsequent to the conference, the Administration formed the Environmental Assessment Team, consisting of employees from several departments, to learn more about the process. The team, which is chaired by Anne Marie Green, is in the process of formulating an environmental management plan, which is a necessary step in the pursuit of ISO 14001-compliance status. The main reason to pursue ISO 14001compliance is that it limits the liability of the County in case of any environmental incidents generated by County activities. It also shows the citizens that their County government is concerned with maintaining and improving the environmental quality of life for the community. The staff would like the 1 ` ,. . s opportunity to present to the Board of Supervisors what has been learned to date, as well as what steps are necessary to complete the ISO 14001 compliance process. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors schedule a work session at the July 10, 2001 meeting of the Board of Supervisors to review ISO 14001 compliance requirements and steps necessary to establish an Environmental Management System for Roanoke County. Respectfully submitted: Daniel R. O'Donnell Assistant County Administrator Approved: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received to _ Referred to Motion by: No Yes Abs Church _ _ Johnson _ McNamara _ _ Minnix _ _ Nickens 2 Item No. _ ~- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, 5204 BERNARD DRIVE, SW., ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: June 26, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Work Session Regarding Implementation of Ambulance Fees for Service COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Recommend approval BACKGROUND: On May 22, 2001 the Board of Supervisors approved the Ordinance setting the legal framework to implement user fees for Emergency Medical Services. In order to implement the fees necessary to support the County's fire and rescue staffing needs, a resolution must be approved which sets in place the actual fee structure to be used. We would like to present a proposed fee structure, discuss implementation timeframes and incorporate the concerns of the members of the Board of Supervisors into our activities as we move forward to implement the program. In order to stay on schedule, we request that a Work Session be scheduled for the July 24 meeting of the Board of Supervisors. Respectfully submitted: Daniel R. O'Donnell Assistant County Administrator Approved: ~~~6~ ~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION No Yes Abs Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received to Referred to Motion by: Church Johnson _ McNamara Minnix _ Nickens ~y GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Audited Beginning Balance at July 1, 2000 Oct 24, 2000 Funds for twenty additional paramedic firefighters and planning for renovations to Vinton, Read Mountain, and Mason Cove stations Dec 19, 2000 County's half share in Phase I Construction Costs for McDonald Farm business park Dec 19, 2000 Advance of funds for water and sewer improvements for the Stable Road Water and Sewer District ($418,766) and traffic signal and road improvement ($81,234) in the Clearbrook community Jan 9, 2001 Matching funds for TEA-21 grant to construct the Green Hill Park section of the Roanoke River Greenway Apr 10, 2001 Local cost State-wide Democratic Primary Jun 12, 2001 Balance at June 26, 2001 Changes below this line are for information and planning purposes only. Balance from above Jan 23,2001 Potential use for Phase II NPDES stormwater assessment of General Amount Fund Revenue $9,908,641 8.33% (907,000) (500,000) (500,000) ($47,100) ($23,160) $7,931,381 6.6 $7,931,381 (40,000) $7,891,381 6.63 Note: On December 18, 1990, the Board of Supervisors adopted a goal statement to maintain the General Fund Unappropriated Balance at 6.25% of General Fund Revenues 2000 - 2001 General Fund Revenues $118,982,797 6.25% of General Fund Revenues $7,436,425 Respectfully Submitted, Appr ved By, ~~~ /~~~ Danial Morris Elmer C. Hodge Director of Finance County Administrator / Y'" CAPITAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Balance from June 27, 2000 Board meeting Addition for sale of land and equipment during 1999-2000 Audited beginning balance at June 30, 2000 Transfer from 1999-2000 departmental savings r 27,2001 Funding combined with community donations to provide for lighting of baseball field at Starkey Park (See Note 1) 10,2001 Blue Ridge Parkway Visitors Center (replace grant funding) y 8, 2001 Fire Alarm System, County Administration Center Balance at June 26, 2001 ote 1: Capital Fund to be reimbursed from any Virginia Gas Pipeline proceeds Respectfully Submitted, Danial Morris Director of Finance Appr ved By~ ~~~ Elmer C. odge ' County Administrator Amount $279,722.09 303,501.34 583,223.43 224,701. (25,000.00) (25,000.00) (101,500.00) $656,424.43 ~ `:~J RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Amount From 2000-2001 Original Budget July 25, 2000 Contribution to D-Day Memorial Sept 12,2000 Video distribution for Senior and Challenged Citizens Commission Sept 12,2000 Project Impact Jan 9, 2001 VML/VACO Assessment, AEP Negotiations Feb 27, 2001 Purchase of Automated External Defribillators Feb 27, 2001 Agreement with SMPAC to provide information to SCC Balance at June 26, 2001 Respectfully Submitted, Danial Morris Director of Finance Awed By,~! Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator $100,000.00 (10,000.00 (1,000.00 (12,800.00 (4,183.00 (60,000.00 (5,000.00 $7,017.00 ~~ FUTURE SCHOOL CAPITAL RESERVE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Savings from 1996-1997 debt budget $670,000.00 Transfer from County Capital Projects Fund 1,113,043.00 FY 1997-1998 Original budget appropriation 2,000,000.00 June 23, 1998 Savings from 1997-1998 debt fund 321,772.00 FY 1998-1999 Original budget appropriation 2,000,000.00 FY 1999-2000 Original budget appropriation 2,000,000 Less increase in debt service (1,219,855) 780,145.00 November 9, 1999 Savings from 1998-1999 debt fund 495,363.00 FY2000-2001 Original budget appropriation 2,000,000 Less increase in debt service (1,801,579) 198,421.00 Balance at June 26, 2001 $7,578,744.00 Reserved for Future School Operations FY2000-2001 Original budget appropriation $1,500,000.00 July 1 1, 2000 SW Co Regional Stormwater (290,000.00) Balance at June 26, 2001 1,210,000.00 * Of this amount $736,680 is currently being used for the lease purchase of refuse vehicles and will be repaid within two years. Respectfully Submitted, Danial Morris Director of Finance ACS ved B}r~ iyv~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ,~ ^. O .rws O N ~ m cr ~ M ~ ~ 00 C~ 00 01 N vl V1 ~!1 ~O M I~ ~ ~--~ V'1 l~ O Vl ~O o0 01 01 [~ d' M ~O vl N v'i .--~ 01 O 01 O ~ _^ ~ y O ~.+ vl ~ N O ~ oo ~--~ rt D, N d: ~--~ l oo N N N N M O N --+ ~O O~ v~ ~ M ~n oo ~ a\ ~ N ~ O ~ O o0 `D Q p o ~ a1 ~ ~ O~ ~O M ~ ~O M ~ O~ O ,--. ~ ~-+ O oo ~ •-+ ~ [~ ~ O ~ ~ a, O ~ [~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M a1 ~ :: O ~ ~ .~ l~ ~ O ~O l~ oo D, O O a1 ~ ~-+ 00 ~ ~ D\ [~ ~ O o0 ~ M ~ a, a, ~ 00 00 00 D\ .~ o0 00 0o vl ~ ~ i ca ~ ~ ~ N oc°. Q ~ a ~ C4 „p ~ vi N N v'i ~n O ~O M M vi O N O O l~ ~--~ ~ M l~ a\ 00 ~ oo ~ ~ M O~ ~n d' ~--~ ~ O~ O ~--~ ~ a\ O O M ~O ~/1 [~ l~ d' O\ N M O ~t v~ D1 v'~ N vl 00 O\ l~ 00 ~--~ ~ ~ N ~ O O ~i' N N M ~O ~ O Q1 ~ M ~ ~ '.. 00 ~O M o0 l~ 00 vl ~O vl O •--~ ^~ O M O\ N o0 V O\ ~--~ M ~O Q1 ~ O\ D1 ~ N v'i O ~--~ l~ M d~ 00 ~ M v M N N ~!) ~ \O N ~O V1 v'1 ~O M N M l~ N O M ~D ~O O D\ ~--~ N OO 01 M ~t M Q\ OO M OO [~ ~ ~ M •C~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~}' N O N ~' M O\ N ~' •--~ O~ M ~O ~D ~ M d' M 01 Vl N CO 01 N ~ M ~--~ vl v'i ~O ~ ~ M ~-+ ~--~ ,--i O M N N ~--~ Vl ~ N M N ~--~ ~ M O ~/'1 ,--~ .-. y 00 ~ N OO ~/'~ vl O ~ M [~ ~ O o0 O O M U O~ M l~ N ~ ~ ~ N M 01 M f~ N ~' 0~0 ~O ~ ~O o00 C~ v~ M ---~ ~O ~O ,--~ N --+ ~ ~ ~ O~ --+ 00 O\ ~O O N ~--~ ~ ~ 00 .--~ ~ ~ [~ r+ O O ~ ~ ~ M ~ ~ N Q ~ oo l~ N ~h V M ~ ~ v1 ~ M o0 N ~-+ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ oo O D\ ~ M M O o0 a1 M O~ N oo ~O l~ ^' y ~ O vl ~ N 00 M N ~ d' ~O [~ ~D O oo O~ N ~--~ O M ~t M ~' ~ N o0 M 01 O ~ ~ ~ vl v'~ O ~ d' a, N M N N O D\ vl 00 d' ~ O N N ~ O~ M O N ~D oo N N a n O M 00 ~ a ~ O N ~ v'i d' ~--~ N .-. N Q\ ~ ~--~ N N d "~ C~ ~--i ~ O i ~ ~ .~ti H ~ N Q\ M O_ M Vl ~ ~O ~O D\ O 01 M M N M O l~ 00 N l~ N M M M ~-+ d\ ~ ~ ~ ~ 00 N ~ a M ~ y [~ l~ [~ ^~ O O ~ a1 ~ N N M ~ 00 ~ ~ ~--~ ~ M vl ~ N ~--~ N O~ M N ~n ~n ~O l~ v'~ O ,.w _ ~ y~.y ¢ O v'i ~t N O ~O ~--~ ~ ul 00 M O O N ~--~ ~--~ M D\ ~ ~--~ ~ N 01 M M N ~--~ N v'~ O\ D1 M O ~ ,Q C~ p ^ ~ ,~_, ~ 00 a\ 00 ~ ~ ~--~ ~ ~ O o0 ~ N O N ~ d' ~t N a\ --~ '7 [~ •--~ M ~ ~ ~ O M o0 ~ ~+ bA 'O O i l~ N ~ ~n O ~ oo vi N ~t O N N ~n oo ~D a1 ~' M ~ M ~ N ~ O N [~ O ~ ~O ~ M M N ^' v ~ ~ a v o .~ o0 ~ d ~ .-, r. w c ~ o ~ ~ a ~ ~ O M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o0 ~O O ~O M O ~1 O o0 O ~--~ N C O C 'F O y ,~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0~~ 0 7 N 0 ~O vl M O O ~O vl --+ p~ X 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O v-~ 0 0 O ~n O oo ~t O O l~ O O ~O N M O~ -+ t7 ~n ~ W ~ ~ ~-+ O O O O O O O O O O vi vi ~ O O ~ a\ ~ v1 O O d' ~O N O ~--~ ~t O ao ~ N vi l~ l~ ~t ~ ,...i O O M [~ ~--~ ~ Vl O ~--~ ~O O N ~--~ [~ M M l~ ~O M ~ [~ N vl 00 ~ N D, v'1 O [~ a1 ~ ~ ~ O O '+~+ ,.., ~ oo •--~ ~--~ ~ ~--~ N v'~ oo a\ ~ ~--~ d' ~O ~O r' N N v'~ [~ M ~--~ N ~--+ ~O ~ ~n O M M M O ~ 'O O O M N ~p V1 M ~--~ .-i N ~--~ N ~ ~--~ M N ~ '-' C, ~' y v~ N .-, 0 ~ ~ o ~ ~ 3 ~ o o ~ ~ (~ -d ~ ~'' F`~.,~O~F., E~ 'k° y'o p ~ aiw ~ ~ ~ aoi ~ a`~i~ one b t~•~"~ a~¢ o ~ p.., ~ `n N °~ O p, ~ A. ~ U 'O U ¢, 'b ~ ~ w ~., .~" O O a; k °'~ c~c °~ o ~ ~ sue, ,~ O ~ «s v, . ~ O O a> .1-'.»' a> a~ a> b ~ ~ y ~ ~' a0i api b~A sb..° ~ v O ~ ~., ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ a> O O N O N ~ O O O ~~., O cC +.+ O ~ .~ F.' cC O N .--. .f i .~~' N N f,' ,~ a) . ~ ~ O ~ G~ .y N ,~ y .Y: cG a• ~ xaaa,a.aUa~w~H'axF-O¢awwUa.wwu;UUw~rxzv~3o3wooH w _ _ z `O O_ .~ N .M-~ ~ O ~ N M ~ ~n ~O t~ oo a1 O ~--~ N 7 ~ oO 01 O N oo O ~--~ ~O O ~t M O N \O N M N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M M M V ~f ~ d' V'1 Vl v~ l0 lp ~O C~ 00 00 00 O\ 01 ~. "' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N ^-' O O N ~ ~ b+ ~ ~ 0 w ~ A o ~ ~D ~~b ~' > ~ ~ 0. Q ~ ~ ~ v 7 . C ri ~ C C M L C O C ~ M GC C .~ i. r1 O C1 CC 0 e«. O '~ O ~--i O M O 'b .b C W '~ O .~ a c 0 ~--i L O W c~ rn A ~ o ~ ~, 1. ~ C~ ~ y ~ ~ C y .~ a~ ^O 7 FQ N M o~ N O ~--i 01 7 O~ M U 0 M b M M CC O b q i. 0. M ~ O ~O ^C G' '~ ~. a> C a> 0 0 rl ~i r.~ r 0 a~i `~' o ~y '. O N F 'O 'O 'D ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ate.. ~ a w w w o '~ ~ c y o Q 'o ~ ~ o W y ~ ~ w a ~" U y ~3., Y """.,.~ C w r, /'~~ M O O N ~ y R a Q C~ ..~ .,..i bA it O C~ O 4.i O O U a ~ ~ o .o ~ V1 W A ~ 0 ~ a ~ OD O L y ~ y ai c~'e M x " ~ O ~ .a V ~ q 'C W C"i 'C1 ~ O '~ ~~ ~ P~ ~ ~ q o W .~ +~ ti O C ~ a~ y ~ ~" 0 ~ ~ e~ 'LS N V C •C~ R2 i~.i C~ CC v~ A~ O C •• y ~ ~ ~a ~~ ~ ~ C a~ a~i CD b Pa b c w e~ s, a a~ C7 0 0 r, c f~ z ~ M i ' .~.~ 0 0 ~ m ro ~ 0. Q a w A 'O ~ ~ ~ G 7 ~ pp a~+ Q O ~ 7 Gj ~ ~ 0. h O ... .., ~. Or O i. ~ ~„~ Q~ O b M '~ ~ O i.~ ~ .r ~ .d ~ ~ y^ ~ C W .b O ~ ~ ~s, ~° ~ a W 'S: 4r ~ ~ ~ O Ca ~ ~ .3 ~ •--~ O ''" ^C U ~ ~ ~ o W ~ w O 6~ v a N ~ ~O '.~ ^- r Ci. `^ u Y 6~ C GC u ca ~i ~ C u i e~C ~' ~ A y ~ L °' ° v W ~ ~"' ~ u C ~ ce C cC ~ ~ ~ u OW i~ O G 'C O y CL k W bA -a 7 CO '~ e~ ~. C7 0 0 .~ "'~ C W ~ N V 1!'J O~ ~ M d' O .~-i oo r O vl O O oo ~ O~ Vl M ~--~ O~ M M r tI') Vl O ~ O ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ 7 vl O~ ~--~ DO O~ 1n M N N ~O Op M M ~O O~ M O~ p 00 0o ao ~ r ~ r o0 0~ o~ oo Op co 0 00 ~o o~ r o~ •--~ ~--~ d• ~O r ~--~ 00 O ~--~ ~ O ~ ~ r ~ M r ~O CT ~O l~ ~ l~ v-~ .-" ~p •-r •--~ N ~--~ ~p M ~ V O ~ 00 00 M r N M ~n r N M ~O M d' ~O '-+ l~ M~ l~ M v"i M r ~D ~n O ~O ~--~ an N ~--~ O ~ V O~ ~n O ~--~ 7 M d~ O~ M ,--~ 7 O~ ~O o0 ~O O ~-+ O~ v~ O~ V~ O ~--i I~ N Vj 7 M 00 rl ~ r, c1' ~ DO ~ r ~ ~ 00 lp 1n M ~-+ ~ O~ ~ ~t ~O O o0 0o M O ~O V'1 O O M ~n .~ 00 00 N N ~ l~ d' M ~O ~--~ ~ ~O O -~ N ~ N i ~ ~ v i v i 7 ~ U ~n O r M oo O~ r d• oo r O O O .--i ~ ~ ~ b ~ ~ ~ o~ ., ~n ~o .~ r o~ ~ N 7 N ~ N O O ~O ~ r ~ O O~ ~ O M V') M r O~ ~ r rn rn o~ ~o 0o vl O~ ~n O v~ oo N d' P1 ~--~ O~ M •--~ ~ lp M M N ~ ~p O~ ~ N N 0o v~ d• CT ~--i O O O O r~ ~ O D\ ~--~ O O O O~ O O~ ~n O ~D ~n N ~n O M O d' O ~ ~--~ O ri r r oo O M ~O v1 .-ti ~--~ ~--~ N N ~--~ M 00 ~O M O M O N O DD M ~--i r oo N M ~O 0 0~ M M M N N M ~O CT N o0 O .-ti M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p v i . -~ rn~t~o~~d• r ~ M ~O ~--~ O~ O ~ O oo ~ V ~ 00 N N v'> ~t N O~ ~--~ ~ ~ oo d• O ~n N ~ M ~ ~O ~ v7 N ~ ~ N ~-+ O~ O O ~n oo O O M O O N ~O O O O~ 00 O O l~ O O V7 ~ ~ ~ M ~ '7 M N •--~ 7 M ~ ~ ~ ~ N N M ~ N 0 ~ N ~ ~ N O O O v '1 o 0 00 ~ 1 l1 N 4\ D1 .--i ~--~ M In ~O N O O O N O O~ N~ V1 O o0 00 00 r o0 ~ M ~ O N ti ~ 00 ~O ~ D1 r ~ r O~ ~--~ ao N oo ~--i vl vl N ~t r O V ---~ v'~ O~ O M ~O N ~--~ O N~ r N O~ r a0 r r 0 O~ M oo [~ ~ .-r .-r .--~ 7 O N H ~ N N~~~ ~ b 00 ~~ r M r .~-~ O N O N O N N O~ 00 O [~ ~' ~O O O~ .--i ~ b ~ r+ 00 00 v) In N 00 O ~n O V• O M ~O O N ~D N .-~ O oo O~ l~ 00 .--. ti is .~ .~ b c~ Q .~ ~ "C U 3~. w ~ ~ ~ r Ion U ~ _v C~ ~ ~ ~ ~, o a 0~ ~ °~ ~ ~~o a~ an ~ . ~ °o ~lC7W o ~--~ N M _O O_ _O O O O O Cl. ~. C/1 C~ ~ ~U '~ "b ~ ~~ o .Y °o U O o ~--~ N O O O O O\ O O O O~ ~O ~!1 O O .--~ O vi M ~ M O -~ N r ~ ~n v'i .-~ O N ao~ao~ ~ ~O N ~--~ ~/1 \O M ~t 00 N 00 O ~O d• '-i ~--~ N 0 U U W O >, F-' ~" •r+ °~ ~ w N Li a'-i V1 ~ ~ Q o .^ v y °~ ~ ~ w 3 ~? ~ •~ °o ~ w U 4 0 ~--~ N M ~ O O O O M M M M O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O ~--~ M ~' O ~--~ N ~--i ~O ~ O r O N .~ ~--~ 00 O M ~--~ 00 7 00 [~ o ~ oo t~ .--i O N vi O O\ t~ r V• M O O v-~ N ~O ~ M N O ti b O O 3 U ~ ~ '_' V. ~~ ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ ' Q~q ~ cU A. • .~ ~~~•~~~ c ~ °° ~' ~ p ~ ~ " C7R;~W~C7 0 --+ N M d' v'1 ~O 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ V ~t ~ ~ 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 M O O O O ~--~ v1 0 .--i M O 00 N O M O Q~ o, O oo O oo t~ ~ o0 .-. O O O o0 r ~O O~ r+ M O\ O M O~ ~n ~ ~ -~ ~O v,--.~ooo~~nrr ~o ~ O M ~O O 00 ~ N M .-r N M M ~ v O d• v l '~ M M M ~--~ O O O M o0 M~~~ O .~-~ O .--~ O~ ~ v~ ~ ~ DD 01 M M M M ~D N l~ ~ N oo ~ .--~ ~ ~O ~O o0 ~D \O V ~ ~O ,--~ 00 00 .-~ N ~--~ O ~D N O~ O~ ~O ,--~ a0 M ~ 00 ~O ~ M M V r 00 ~ N ~ N ~ ~ ~ 00000000 ~o 0 0 0 0 0 0 d' O rf O O vi 0 0 0 N O l~ ~ r p . -i M N N N O r M N 0 0o O N v~ O ~O ~O ~ O r 0 O .--~ O M o0 00 O O vi 00 D\ O D1 •-+ r ~--~ ~O M O N ~O N ~ a1 V O R 00 b N vl ~+ ~ N .-. .--~ ~--~ ~p O O M 0 0 0 0 0 M O O V 0 0 0 0 0 ~ vi ~f Q\ u1 O N O O M r 00 ~O ~-+ O r Vl ~O ~p ~ N ~--~ V ~--~ 'n ~ M O N [~ N l~ O M M ~ N O ~ ~ ~ . -. ~ O ~, ~ .y U O ~ L •y w `n ~ N ~ ~ y .~ . ~ C 'b ~ Q C/~ N O C~ i U i ,~ ~ a > ~ ~ j ~ '" ~ w ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ •~ ~ •~ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ a~ ~ xx~ ~¢.s~,x x ~. ~.~~~.~~~~ O o ~av°~Ua..~cn°~ o ~--~ M ~' Vl ~O r 00 G\ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N ~ O N N N Oq ~ a Q C~ .~ bA it •.r O CI C~ a O L7 0 U ~~ a N ~ r z ~ M `~ ~ ° d A C O o pp ~ C C ° '~ k L~ "~ W W ~ ~Q "1 'Q i~.i ~ ~ 7 `~ u ~ ~ ~ -~ v u w L L CC s A O y ? L a e ~ W .--~ O M O b .b C W O ~L a O C 0 s. 0 W OA `~ C ~ ., ce 'O s. C O e~ Y u OW u ~ L O ~ ~' C 'O O C d K W Y on b O b ~n L d 0 0 ., ~ ' C r_~ r o~~ ~ ~~~~ o M~n~-~ooo '--~ oo N N 0 0 0 N [~ O r ~ ~--~ 00 00 ~ O ~p O ~ O 00 [~ OMO l~ [~ ~ OHO 001 ~ pip 00 h [~ 00 v1 N o0 W 00 h ~--~ N O •-r ~ ~O \0 [~ ~0 O Q1 M V'1 00 00 O O O 00 O O O 11'! ~ O v'~ O~ N 01 01 O ~-+ ~ 01 v~ l~ O O O 00 M O M 01 a1 M a\ ~--i l~ N t~ O 00 00 [~ M o0 O l~ ,--i M V O ~' ti ~ 01 ~ Q~ N 00 N O M O N M \0 O ~--~ 00 ~O V7 O V1 N N vi v1 M N a, [~ ~ ~ O o0 ~ O O M ~--i ~0 O ~O ~D l~ vl ,--~ 7 O oo a\ 01 a\ ~ N vi ~ ~ ~--~ ~ 00 .--~ O~ M ~ V1 ~0 10 00 [~ \O N N 10 vl v'~ M ~ 01 ~0 In ~O 00 M N •--~ N N vl O1 M d' U7 N .-i t~ 00 N N 00 ~0 01 O ~ ~ M~ O r+ M v'~ 01 N 0 0 0 ~ O O O M ~0 Q\ O ~ h 0 0 0 ~ vl 01 ~--~ N 0 0 0 ~ [~ O ~ ~ 10 ~ ~ V1 N 00 v1 O ~ 00 l~ \O ~--~ O O O M 01 O ~ O O o0 00 h M ~n ~0 ~--~ ~D t~ N N M O ~O oo M ~"~ 00 D, (~ ~ N ~ .-+ O 01 t ~ N o0 N o0 O ~"~ oo ~O ~ 10 ~ d' O O ~t O O ~ ~--~ ~--~ ~--~ vi ~ vi O ~ O ~ N l~ v1 ~ O N o0 O o0 01 ~--~ d' N V vl ~ _ O ~"~ 00 O l~ O v'i o0 ~ ~ O M 01 ~ ~ 00 \O ~--i ~ 10 O N O O M O M O O l~ O O O O l~ O O O I~ M v1 O 01 0 0 0 et O O l~ O O O O l~ O O O M H M O et O O ~l O ~ O O l~ O O O O [~ O O O .ti M Q1 N ~--~ ~--i N N ti vl 00 ~ ~--~ ~--i 10 ~ 'V M M ~ ~--~ O N ~--i M l~ O O ~--~ a\ 00 O 00 O d' a, O O O O M O O O b [~ vl O M [~ N M O M O 01 X 0 0 0 0 7 ~ O V1 ~D ~ O ~D V O M O 00 U N M 0 0 0 0 V') v'~ O M ~ O ~O ~O M oo O ~--i M vl ~ O [~ v'~ N O ~--~ 7 V'l ~ 00 00 ~--~ ~ V"1 00 00 ~ N t ~ 00 O ~ N ~ ~ M O1 M ~' 00 O l~ [~ ~ N M ~--~ ~--i ~--i .~ l ^ ~ r ~ ~OOV, ,~ o000 0 000000 ~ o0 0 00 oov, ~0 0000 0 00~000o r oO 0 q ~O ~n ~O l~ O M O ~ O O 01 O O t~ ~--~ r ~h O ~ O v1 l~ M ~D _ ~O V' a, O ~ O v'i O O ~--~ 00 N 7 M r ~ _ ~--~ M ~O 00 [~ d' N N O ~0 O O O M M Vl ~0 ~--~ M N O N R d' Q\ D\ ~ .--i N v'i l~ O O l~ ~--~ M M ~ 1n \O N ~--~ M ~O O 00 [~ 00 \O 00 ~--~ 00 O ~--~ M M O [~ [~ ~ 01 ~--~ N N l~ 00 l~ N vl ~ '-+ 01 M D1 V M O~ N N ~ ri N ~ .-i ~ ~ M ~--i RS Y. ~ ~ L1. °~ ~ ~ R. ~ ~ ~" O y O a~ N b ~ O ~.. D ~ ~ Y Y ~ o ~ ~ ~ A x ~ ~«; ~ a~ ~ Y ~ ~ ,~„~ ~ o ~ y on ~ ¢. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .Y ~4 ~~ a: ° x a a: ~ ~. ~ `~ ~ ~ w w ~ N U O ~ > ~ E ~ ~ cn b > ~ N Q ~ ~ y v ~ ~ N a~ ~ ~ ~ °' ~ p W ~y >, ~ C ~ rte, ~ ue cx W C° ~" ~3 .? Q .o o ~ ~ a~ w ~ ~ ~. o H E-~ s , ~~~ ~~~~ o~~~~~~ ~~ .~ ~ ~ o ~~ o o ~ o . ~,, .k ~ ~ ~ ~~ a o ~. ~ o ~ ~lU o aUWU o o ~~U~ W(~~E o ~ ~ o p .. - ~--~ N M ~ N M Vl ~--~ N M I lp h 00 ~-+ N O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~~~~ a, a\ O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O y CC O F" ^O t~ CC F, V ~~/~. .~ ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER ~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BGARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER. MEETiI`~IG DATE:June 26, 2001. AGENDA ITEMS: Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investment and Portfolio Policy, as of i~1ay 31, 2001. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: BANKERS ACCEPTANCE: BRANCH BANKING &TRUST 1,987,008.33 1,987,008.33 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSITS: FIRST AMERICAN 100,000.00 SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA SAVINGS & LOAN 100,000.00 200,000.00 COMMERICAL PAPER: BANK OF AMERICA 995,196.67 PAlNE-WEBBER 1,992,677.78 SUNTRUST 1,985,590.00 WACHOVIA 994,305.00 5,967,769.45 GOVERNMENT: BRANCH BANKING &TRUST 995,257.78 WACHOVIA 994,722.22 1,989,980.00 LOCAL GOVT INVESTMENT POOL: GENERAL FUND 8,465,196.84 RESOURCE AUTHORITY 2,024,617.25 10,489,814.09 MONEY MARKET: SUNTRUST 10,925,274.87 FIRST UNION 2,209,149.90 PAINE-WEBBER 12,614,467.27 25,748,892.04 CASH INVESTMENTS: SUNTRUST 15,874,106.93 LB&T 3,492,884.09 MENTOR {GEN. OPER} 5,759,259.75 MENTOR {RES. AUTH.} 6,133,512.24 WACHOVIA 2,507,306.72 33,767,069.73 TOTAL 80,150,533.64 ~ ~' . ACTION NO ITEM NUMBER ~""~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROAisOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER. MEETING DATE:June 26, 2001. AGENDA ITEMS: Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investment and Portfolio Policy, as of May 31, 2001. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Respectfully Submitted by r: ,- Alfred C. Anderson County Treasurer ACTION Approved (}Motion by: Denied t ) Approved by: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Received ( ) Referred ( ) To (} Church Johnson McNamara Minnix Nickens MOTE No Yes Abs - ..~ L ACTION # ITEM NUMBERf v ATA REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 26, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: Accounts Paid -May 2001 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Direct Deposit Checks Payments to Vendors: $7,930,996.68 Payroll 5/11/01 $617,977.32 $163,937.97 781,915.29 Payroll 5/25/01 637,130.16 172,361.88 809,492.04 Void Checks (549.13) (549.13) Manual Checks 1,046.20 1,046.20 $9,522,901.08 A detailed listing of the payments is on file with the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. SUBMITTED BY: Danial Morris Director of Finance ~ `, r ~~ ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved () Motion by: Church _ _ _ Denied () Johnson _ _ _ Received () McNamara- Referred () Minnix _ To () Nickens _ _ _ b - ®~ °~° c ~I ~,~{, J`i / r Y ~~~ ~~~ C®1~1I~1[®1®T~~~I,~'~ o f VIRGINIA CHARLES D. NOTTINGHAM COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1401 EAST BROAD STREET RICHMOND, 2321!}2000 JAMES S. GNENS STATE SECONDARY ROADS ENGINEER June 11, 2001 Mr. Elmer C. Hodge Roanoke County P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Dear Mr. Hodge: The enclosed report contains a list of all changes to the Secondary System of State Highways in your county approved by the State Secondary Roads Engineer in May 2001. All additions to and abandonments from the Secondary System are effective the day they are approved by the State Secondary Roads Engineer. This date appears in the far right column of the monthly report. These changes will be presented to the Commonwealth Transportation Board at its monthly meeting on June 21, 2001. If you have any questions or comments about this report, please call Martin Law at 786-7399. James S. Givens ~ State Secondary ads Engineer JSG/MII Cc ~ ~ WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING "" b O N ~ i .~. ~ u ~ y ~ w ~ W V~ C ~ .~ 7 r~+ ~ C~ ~ Aa h a+ ~ C~"~ .~ .~ L L +.+ ~° a w o g ~ ~~ o, ~~ ~ V 'Zj ~o ~ ~ O Obi ~ 0~ 'Y 7 O ~. w bD h ~ y~+ bq ~ G ~ ~ z 0 v x L 4r v O G ~ i Lam' O D 04'i O ry' U O O '~ '~ C R s U ~, C C ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 M M ~ ~ M M O O O N w x x Cq w 0 a 0 N N O 7 ~ U H a •~ y F ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~.. w 0 0 c a 0 0 U yUy y N I N N ^ C b w`r~ w' N ~ ~ ~ 0 0 a°, N K v w ~ '~ C ~ o .1 ++ C u ~ V] o ,~ c U O Ci O 6> b0 Cd b .~ c ea U z O H 0 O N N d r '~ O i Cf O 0 .~ 0 4 r 0 d ,N y v 0 Z3 s .~A AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY JUNE 26, 2001 RESOLUTION 062601-8 CERTIFYING THE CLOSED MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened a closed meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such closed meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the closed meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the closed meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the Certification Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: `l ~~ Brenda J. Holton, CMC Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Closed Meeting File ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~'- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 26, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: Communication of Findings from Planning Commission Review of Proposed City of Roanoke Parking Lot on Carvins Cove Road COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: Section 15.2-2232 of the Code of Virginia provides that when a locality adopts a community plan that plan shall control the general location and character of public facilities. When a public facility is proposed that is not shown on the plan, the Code provides that the Planning Commission shall review the proposed public facility to determine whether or not the construction of the facility is substantially in accord with the plan. The Planning Commission makes the final determination on plan conformance and communicates its findings to the Board of Supervisors. The Board may overrule the decision of the Commission. In addition, if the owner of the proposed facility is aggrieved by the Commission's action, it may file an appeal with the Board of Supervisors within 10 days of the Commission's action. The City of Roanoke has proposed to construct a 30-vehicle parking lot on City owned land in Roanoke County. This proposal is subject to Section 15.2-2232 of the Code of Virginia because the public facility is not shown on the Roanoke County Community Plan. CURRENT PROPOSAL: The City of Roanoke owns and operates the Carvins Cove Reservoir and surrounding watershed. Last year the City prepared and adopted a land use master plan for the Carvins Cove watershed. Recommendations of this plan included permitting limited recreational opportunities at the Cove such as hiking, biking, horseback riding and fishing. While City staff has publicly stated that they would prefer all recreational ~~ activities to occur at the Hollins side of the Cove they recognize that the more remote, wilderness side of the Cove, accessed from Carvins Cove Road is very attractive to those seeking to hike, mountain bike and ride horses. To service this population of users, the master plan recommended constructing a new parking facility on Carvins Cove Road. The proposed parking lot replaces an existing parking lot, in Botetourt County, at the end of Carvins Cove Road approximately 1.5 miles east of the proposed site. The City closed access to this existing lot one year ago and does not wish to reopen this lot citing water quality and security concerns. Without access to this parking lot, hikers, bikers and horse riders have been parking along the shoulders of Carvins Cove Road. The proposed lot would accommodate approximately 30 vehicles including some space designed for vehicles with horse trailers. A single entrance is proposed to Carvins Cove Road. The proposed parking lot does not include lighting, restroom facilities or a gate to control access. PLANNING COMMISSION FINDINGS: The Planning Commission discussed at length several issues concerning the proposed parking lot. While acknowledging the need for a parking facility, the Commission questioned the chosen location citing its distance from trail heads, security issues and the safety of traveling 1.5 miles from the parking lot to the Cove property along Carvins Cove Road. The Commission heard from approximately 10 citizens supporting the proposed parking facility. Most of them stated that while this was not a perfect solution to the parking need in that area, it was an improvement over parking along the road. Mr. Witt stated that the proposed parking lot is in conformance with the Roanoke County Community Plan and that this is a regional quality of life issue. Providing access to recreational facilities such as this one, he believes, will attract and keep young people in the valley. Ms. Hooker made the motion to approve the general location of the parking lot as being substantially in accord with the Community Plan. The motion passed 5-0. Respectfully Submitted, Janet Scheid, Senior Planner Department of Community Development Approved, C~~~~ Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ., Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) W-q ACTION VOTE Church Johnson No. Yes Abs Motion by: McNamara Minnix Nickens o~ p,OANp,Y~ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ z .~ ., Z o ya J APPEARANCE REQUEST 7838 PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: 9 _G, o `~ ~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk writfen authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: Cr'/-~N~ IY-Jo~ ~- ADDRESS: ~~ /6 ~ f.~jZUll'~~s (~, PHONE: 3~~ ~ Gl y~s a~ ~,oaNO,~F AGENDA ITEM NO. S,. ~ ~. Z J raz ;83$ APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE C~~TIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: C~/~''%%~'S' ~'' U ~ ~' f~~f'~r'~~'S ~ ~ ~' I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW= ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ADDRESS: y~ ~5` C_~/~ ~~ ~~ PHONE: o~ POANO,YF AGENDA ITEM NO. ~~_ ~. Z , ~, ~ _ ,z J .a APPEARANCE REQUEST 1838 PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: C-~>`~ r n 5 ~d ~ e_ ~~,~~,~`~ ~c~ ~® I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ,~viy,~G,~ ~~J ~~ ~tyl,~Y r Z ADDRESS: ~Pl~ C,"/-~~u/~,S C'ca/G /~ PHONE: ~~,~L/ ~T~eS' o~ POANO,Y~ AGENDA ITEM NO. S -- ti Z ~_ v ,, 'a ,83$ APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE y CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~'P~~ ~ j J/%~' ~°~' cJ / ~ (~' -„~( /~ (`, I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTER/V, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: "~ ~~ ~ ~ ~` C ~ j `~ ~- J / r ADDRESS: ,~ ~/ ,,~ ~ /-f i ~, ~L ~ r ,~ PHONE: L~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ / ,~ S ~~ , ~~~1 o~ Ao""~~F AGENDA ITEM NO. -S ~" .~ Z V 't;h „aZ 1838 APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE ~ CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: _ ~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TD THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: K ° ~E'~ ~ ~551°/~ ADDRESS: ~0 0 ~d lG/Z~III /~ZC~J~ ~~' ~~ ~~ PHONE'. 510- %~9-](~C~~ o~ POAN AFL AGENDA ITEM NO. N '~ .* ~_ ~ ~1 Z o ~z J ., APPEARANCE REQ EST 1838 PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE ~ CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: ti~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~- ~G~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD i/ ~ ~~~_ NAME: -L-/'-^^"w~~ ADDRESS: Z~ ~~ Jt,t, w~,1u^ r ~~C~c~ ~ ~U(i(- PHONE: _ 3"C ~ ~i ~ Z~-- o~ ?°AN ~F` AGENDA ITEM NO. ~~_ z , ~ ~'~ Z ,83a APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE !~ CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~~ 5 ~ a per-; t? it C-A~U ~y G~y~ (' Pd~-+~ ~~-k~-~ c,v I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. /AGREE TD AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~~~ ~~ ADDRESS: 2~ 2`~ tL l ~~s ~ !~'~ ~ ~~~~ r v~-~nt 1, PHONE: ~''I.~ ` ~`~~ -~`~Z~ f AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 26, 2001 ORDINANCE 062601-9 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO THE TRUSTEES OF EVANGEL FOURSQUARE CHURCH FOR THE MASTER PLAN OF A RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY AND A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A DAY CARE CENTER TO BE LOCATED ON 48 ACRES OF AR-ZONED PROPERTY WITH ACCESS FROM THE 5400 BLOCK OF INDIAN GRAVE ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 98.02-2-16), CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DIS- TRICT WHEREAS, The Trustees of Evangel Foursquare Church have filed a petition for a special use permit for the master plan of a religious assembly and a special use permit for a day care center on 48 acres of AR-zoned property with access from the 5400 block of Indian Grave Road (Tax Map No. 98.02-2-16) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on May 1, 2001 and continued to June 5, 2001; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on April 24, 2001; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on June 26, 2001. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to The Trustees of Evangel Foursquare Church for the master plan of a religious assembly and a special use permit for a day care center on 48 acres of AR-zoned property will access from the 5400 block of Indian Grave Road (Tax Map No. 98.02-2-16) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 2000 Community Plan pursuant to the 1 r provisions of § 15.2-2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved with the following conditions: (1) The site shall be developed insubstantial conformity with the concept plan prepared by LMW Engineering & Surveying, dated April 28, 2000. If final engineering of the site requires extra grading beyond the immediate area for the church, it shall be necessary for the applicant to reapply for a Special Use Permit. (2) The buildings shall be constructed in substantial conformity with the building elevations prepared by Pierson Engineering & Surveying, dated October 20,1999. (3) The exterior of the buildings and equipment shall be constructed with non-reflective materials and brown and gray colors to reduce the visibility potential from the Parkway and surrounding views. (4) As the site is graded and/or developed, no trees on the site may be removed except for the trees in the immediate path of the driveway to the site from Indian Grave Road, the area for the storm water management facility, the area for the church facilities, day care facilities and parking, playground area and area for the septic drain fields, as shown on the concept plan prepared by LMW Engineering & Surveying dated April 28, 2000. (5) The church shall undertake all transportation and road improvements along Indian Grave Road between Route 220 and the entrance to the church and at the intersection of Indian Grave Road and Route 220 resulting from the increased traffic generated from the church and day care development and deemed necessary to insure adequate and safe access to the site as required by VDOT. (6) No access shall be permitted from Franklin Road to the property. 2 r (7) The church shall be required to extend public water and sewer to the site and the location of these utilities shall generally be located within the right-of-way of Indian Grave Road. The church shall be authorized for cost reimbursements in accordance with the off-site and oversized utility facilities policy contained in section 18-168(D) 3 and 4, and 22-82 (b) (a) (c) and (d) of the Roanoke County Code. 2. That it is the strong recommendation of the Board of Supervisors that a traffic signal be installed at the intersection of Indian Grave Road and Route 220. 3. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance with (1) Condition #5 revised; (2) Condition #7 added; and (3) Paragraph #2 added, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Church, Nickens NAYS: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix A COPY TESTE: cc: Brenda J. H on, CMC Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors File Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Janet Scheid, Senior Planner William E. Driver, Director, Real Estate Valuation Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 3 ,.~ i ~ ~, ~~ ROANOKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Appltrcanta Name: Trustees Evangel Foursquare Church Zoning: Spectral Use Proposed zoning AR (Church and day care) Tax Map No. 98.02-2-16 ~C tt4.. ~ 73 76. ~ "~ ~ .+r ~~i 0.6 1.1 " E ep.l ~ ..w e3.'', PETITIONER: Trustees of Evangel Foursquare Church CASE NUMBER: 14-5/2001 ' Planning Commission Hearing Date: May 1, 2001 -continued until June 5, 2001 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: June 26, 2001 A. REQUEST This request is for a Special Use Permit for the master plan of a religious assembly and a Special Use Permit for a day care center on 48 acres of AR-zoned property with access from the 5400 block of Indian Grave Road. The subject property is located in the Clearbrook Community Planning Area and Cave Spring Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS No citizens spoke. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION Carr L. Kinder represented the applicant. The Commission discussed with the applicant, Kenneth Wright and his representative the reason for the additional requests. The applicant indicated that the County does not have the authority to impose the road improvements and traffic signal conditions. They indicated that only VDOT had that authority. The Commission was advised by staff that VDOT supplied the road standards to Roanoke County with the previous Special Use Permit request. Mr. Kinder indicated that he was not aware of this information and he requested a continuance until June 5, 2001 Planning Commission hearing in order to get a copy of the document and evaluate the information. Mr. Thomason asked staff if anything related to the petition has changed since the May 1, 2001 hearing date and staff responded there was no change. D. CONDITIONS 1. The site shall be developed in substantial conformity with the concept plan prepared by LMW Engineering & Surveying, dated April 28, 2000. If final engineering of the site requires extra grading beyond the immediate area for the church, it shall be necessary for the applicant to reapply for a Special Use Permit. 2. The buildings shall be constructed in substantial conformity with the building elevations prepared by Pierson Engineering & Surveying, dated October 20, 1999. 3. The exterior of the buildings and equipment shall be constructed with non-reflective materials and brown and gray colors to reduce the visibility potential from the Parkway and surrounding views. 4. As the site is graded and/or developed, no trees on the site may be removed except for the trees in the immediate path of the driveway to the site from Indian Grave Road, the area for the stormwater management facility, the area for the church facilities, day care facilities and parking, playground area and area for the septic drainfields, as shown on the concept plan prepared by LMW Engineering & Surveying dated April 28, 2000. 5. The church shall undertake all transportation and road improvements along Indian Grave Road between Route 220 and the entrance to the church and at the intersection of Indian Grave Road and Route 220 as required by VDOT and deemed necessary to insure that adequate and safe access to the site is provided. 6. No access shall be permitted from Franklin Road to the property. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Witt made a motion to give a favorable recommendation for the religious assembly • Special Use Permit with the above listed Conditions. This motion passed 5-0. ~1 " Mr. Witt made a motion to give a favorable recommendation for the day care Special Use Permit with the above listed conditions. The motion passed 4-1. F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report _ Other J net Scheid, Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commission ~ t STAFF REPORT PETITIONER:Trustees Evangel Foursquare Church PREPARED BY: John Murphy CASE NUMBER: 14-5/2001 DATE: May 1, 2001 PART I A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Evangel Foursquare Church Trustees are proposing to construct a new religious assembly facility and day care center with access from the 5400 block of Indian Grave Road. The total facility is proposed to be 43,000 square feet with a 500-seat capacity. This request is for a Special Use Permit for the master plan for amulti-phase religious assembly facility and a Special Use Permit for a day care center. The site is designated as Development in the 1998 Community Plan and is located in the Cave Spring Magisterial District and Clearbrook Community Planning Area. B. DESCRIPTION The Evangel Foursquare Church Trustees are requesting a Special Use Permit for the construction of a new religious assembly facility and a Special Use Permit for a day care center, on a 48-acre parcel, with a proposed access from the 5400 block of Indian Grave Road. The applicant is requesting the Special Use Permit for the master plan of a multi-phase building plan with an ultimate size of 43,000 square feet with a seating capacity of 500. The day care center plans to offer care for infants through age 12 with a before/after school program. The 1998 Roanoke County Community Plan designates the portion of the property proposed for the religious assembly and day care center uses as Development. The Franklin Road frontage of the parcel was rezoned to C-2, CVOD (Clearbrook Village Overlay District) in December of 2000. The frontage of the parcel is identified as "Primary", on the CVOD Guidelines Map, which makes the guidelines mandatory. The CVOD Guidelines (Secondary Area) apply to the area of the property southwest of the Primary Area, but the CVOD guidelines are not mapped on the area of this site for the proposed facilities. The site is located in the Cave Spring Magisterial District and the Clearbrook Community Planning Area. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS The proposed area of development on the 48-acre subject property is zoned AR, Agricultural Residential, the religious assembly and day care center uses are permitted in the AR zoning with a Special Use Permit. Special Use Permits for the proposed uses were approved by the Board of Supervisors in July 2000. The portion of the property that fronts on Franklin Road was rezoned to C-2 CVOD in December of 2000 as part of the Clearbrook Village Overlay District. The Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance defines a religious assembly and day care center as follows: Religious Assembly - A use located in a permanent building and providing regular organized religious worship and related incidental activities, except primary and secondary schools and day care facilities. R-i Day Care Center-Any facility operated for the purpose of providing care, protection and guidance to ten (10) or more individuals during only part of atwenty-four-hour day. This term includes nursery schools, preschools, day care centers for individuals, and other similar uses but excludes public and private educational facilities or any facility offering care to individuals for a full twenty-four-hour period. In considering a Special Use Permit, the proposed development shall conform to the County's Community Plan and other County policies including the purposes of the zoning ordinance, have a minimum adverse impact on the surrounding neighborhood in terms of traffic congestion, noise, drainage and other factors listed in Section 30-19-1 of the zoning ordinance. The Use and Design Standards for a religious assembly require any outdoor activity area which adjoins a residential use type to be landscaped with one (1) row of small evergreen trees in accordance with section 30-92 along the property line adjoining the residential use type. When night-time lighting of such areas is proposed large evergreen trees shall be required. In addition, when parking related to a religious assembly use is adjoining a residential use type, a Type C buffer yard shall be required. The Type C Options are: a 15 foot buffer yard with a 6 foot screening, or a 25 foot buffer yard with small evergreen trees and one (1) row of evergreen shrubs. The Use and Design Standards for a day care facility require compliance with the Minimum Standards for Day Care Centers established by the Virginia Department of Social Services. Approval for well and septic systems shall be required from the Roanoke County Health Department if public utilities are not available to the site. A commercial entrance permit shall be required from VDOT. Additional trip generation information maybe required by VDOT during site plan review. Site plan review will be required from Roanoke County to insure compliance with all Roanoke County development standards including storm-water management. Sealed building plans shall be reviewed by the Building Commissioner and Planning staff. PART II A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Location -The 48-acre site is located with frontage on the west side of southbound Franklin Road (Rt. 220), immediately south of Mane Attractions Hair and Tanning Salon. Access to the subject property is shown on the concept plan from the 5400 block of Indian Grave Road (state route 675). Topog_raphyNe eta ation -The proposed site is heavily wooded with mature evergreen and deciduous trees. Currently the highest elevation of the site is 1550' at the southeast corner. The Franklin Road elevation is the lowest point at approximately 1120'. The concept plan shows the 2 -~ proposed structures to be centered at approximately 1450'. These elevations are based on the engineer's concept plan submitted with the application and these elevations are prior to grading for the site development. Surrounding Neighborhood -The proposed facilities are located with access from Indian Grave Road. This area is composed ofsingle-family homes in the immediate area of the proposed entrance to the religious assembly and day care center facilities. Indian Grave Road at the intersection with Franklin Road has medical offices, a County park, the Clearbrook Elementary School and the Clearbrook Public Safety Building. The subject property fronts on Franklin Road immediately south of the Mane Attractions Hair and Tanning Salon. B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site History for the Evangel Foursquare Church -On June 6, 2000 the Roanoke County Planning Commission heard the petition of the Evangel Foursquare Trustees requesting a Special Use Permit for religious assembly and day care uses on 42.64 acres. The Planning Commission forwarded a favorable recommendation, with conditions, to the Board of Supervisors for the request. The Board of Supervisors heard the request and continued the hearing until the next public hearing date to allow staff and the applicant to determine approximate costs of road and utility improvements. There were significant concerns from the Board of Supervisors and County staff related to the traffic impacts on Indian Grave Road and the intersection of Franklin Road should the church and day care be approved. Information was available to the Board of Supervisors from meetings and correspondence between County staff and VDOT. The Board of Supervisors took action on these requests on July 25, 2000. The Board approved the petitions and attached conditions. A copy of the ordinance (Ordinance 072500-10) will be attached to this staff report with the approved conditions for the Special Use Permit for the Planning Commission to review. In January 2001 the property, on Indian Grave Road, was purchased by the Evangel Foursquare Church Trustees. In April 2001 the applicant submitted this petition requesting Special Use Permits for a religious assembly use and a day care center use on 48 acres, to be acted upon by the Planning Commission on May 1, 2001. Site Layout/Architecture -The building elevations provided by the applicant show one-story facilities, with one section of the sanctuary having a roof peak of 38 feet from grade. The youth building shows a 24-foot high roof peak. The site is readily visible from the Blue Ridge Parkway north of the Franklin Road overpass and from the Roanoke Mountain Overlook Loop. The site has not been engineered and could change based upon the grading needs. Access -The concept plan shows only one (1) access point to Indian Grave Road for the proposed uses. VDOT indicated that sufficient sight distance does not appear to exist to allow a commercial entrance for the subject property without significant improvements to Indian Grave Road. If a new commercial entrance is permitted, a right turn and a left turn lane may have to be constructed to the site. The length of the full width turn lanes and the tapers will be determined once additional information is received about the entrance and the estimated trips generated by the site. No access is proposed from Franklin Road and VDOT indicated that it would be improbable that an entrance could be approved from this road. The speed limit on Indian Grave, a 16-foot wide state maintained road, is posted at 25 mph., and the traffic count is approximately 950 VPD. The development of a day care center will significantly contribute to peak hour 3 traffic. It is uncertain if Indian Grave Road has sufficient capacity to accommodate this additional traffic with a reasonable level of service. Indian Grave Road intersects with Franklin Road, an Urban Arterial Road, with a traffic count of approximately 23,000 VPD. Traffic Impacts -There are two (2) distinct uses proposed with this petition with different traffic impacts. The religious assembly use typically has high volumes of traffic concentrated on off- peak times, generally weekends and evenings. The religious assembly use has expanded significantly to include religious services, classes and meetings as well as recreational or sporting activities for the congregation. This request includes a gymnasium and outdoor recreational facilities. The second proposed use is a day care center for infants through age 12. The day care center use also includes a before and after school program that maybe available to area schools. The day care center is expected to significantly add traffic to the "peak" traffic times on weekdays in the morning and evening rush hours. In addition the shuttling of children from the area schools to the before and after school program would add traffic to and from the proposed site at peak times. Indian Grave Road is a narrow road with one way in and out that intersects with Franklin Road in the Clearbrook neighborhood. Additional traffic generation data is needed to fully evaluate the impacts on Indian Grave Road and the non-signalized intersection at Franklin Road. It is anticipated that a significant number of left turn movements from Indian Grave Road to northbound Franklin Road would be expected with the majority of the businesses and offices located in this direction. This traffic activity would take place at peak weekday hours in association with the proposed day care center. Fire & Rescue/LJtilities -Fire and Rescue service will continue as presently served. The Utility Department indicates that public water and sewer can be provided by connections to the 12" water line and 4" sewer force main along Franklin Road. C. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY COMMUNITY PLAN The subject property has several Future Land Use designations. The site's frontage on Franklin Road has a Transition designation in the 1998 Roanoke County Community Plan. In December of 2000 the zoning of the frontage was changed to C-2 with the Clearbrook Village Overlay District (CVOD) with mandatory design guidelines. Immediately west of the CVOD Primary Area is the Secondary Area in which the guidelines are recommended. The upper or western portion of the tract is designated as Development. According to the concept plan all of the improvements including the structures, parking, stormwater management pond, and entrance are located within the Development designation. Development is the future lane use designation where most new neighborhood development will occur, including large-scale planned developments which mix residential with retail and office uses. A key objective is environmental sensitivity in the site development process. Specifically the Development designation encourages the protection of the site's resources and the incorporation of these environmental features into a development plan. Community activity centers which serve the neighboring residents such as parks, schools, religious assembly facilities, recreational facilities, community clubs and meeting areas are encouraged in the Development areas. In addition Development Future Land Use Areas strongly promote the use of greenways and bike and pedestrian trails in the development of the site. 4 ~'-P D. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Plans for the development of this site shall be subject to site plan review to insure compliance with all County development standards and VDOT requirements. PART III A. STAFF CONCLUSIONS The proposed Special Use Permit requests for the Foursquare Evangel Church, religious assembly use and day care center are consistent with the Development Future Land Use designation in the 1998 Roanoke County Community Plan. The Virginia Department of Transportation and County staff has concerns about inadequate site distance for the entrance as well as the increased traffic generation from the proposed uses. The traffic from the religious assembly use would generally be at off-peak times. The most significant traffic impacts are anticipated as a result of the day care center. This proposed use would generate a significant number of vehicles on Indian Grave Road, a 16-foot wide state road, that intersects with Franklin Road. Vehicles could stack on Indian Grave Road, which has no left turn lane, while waiting to turn left onto Franklin Road at peak traffic times. This stacking of vehicles on Indian Grave Road waiting to make left turns onto Franklin Road may increase the response times of emergency services equipment from the Clearbrook Public Safety building and could pose a public safety problem. The intersection of Franklin Road and Indian Grave Road has no traffic signal and a posted speed limit of 45 mph on Franklin Road. Franklin Road is identified as an Urban Arterial road by VDOT standards and is a four lane divided highway with a grass median. A traffic generation study maybe required as well as the acquisition of additional right of way for any necessary turning lanes and commercial entrance standards. Staff has significant safety concerns related to the increase of vehicular traffic on Indian Grave Road and the intersection with Franklin Road, especially at peak times, which would be generated by the day care center. The site is heavily wooded with mature trees. The Community Plan encourages the protection of a site's resources and the incorporation of these resources into the development plan. The site is readily visible from the Blue Ridge Parkway north of the Franklin Road overpass as well as the Roanoke Mountain Overlook Loop. Special provisions should be made as the site is developed to minimize the removal of trees causing a "visual void" in the side of the mountain from the thick growth of trees. In addition restrictions on the building materials and equipment should be considered to minimize the visual impact from surrounding views. Should the Commission support the Special Use Permit requests staff recommends the following conditions be considered: 1. The site shall be developed in substantial conformity with the concept plan prepared by LMW Engineering & Surveying, dated Apri128, 2000, with the exception that access to the site may be provided from the lower point of access to Indian Grave Road. If final engineering of the site requires extra grading beyond the immediate area for the church, it shall be necessary for the applicant to reapply for a special use permit. 5 (~° l 2. The buildings shall be constructed in substantial conformity with the building elevations prepared by Pierson Engineering & Surveying, dated October 20, 1999. 3. The exterior of the buildings and equipment shall be constructed with non-reflective materials and brown and gray colors to reduce the visibility potential from the Blue Ridge Parkway and surrounding views. 4. As the site is graded and/or developed, no trees on the site may be removed except for the trees in the immediate path of the driveway to the site from Indian Grave Road, the area for the storm water management facility, the area for the church facilities, day care facilities and parking, playground area and area for the septic drainfields as shown on the concept plan prepared by LMW Engineering & Surveying dated April 28, 2000. The church shall undertake all transportation and road improvements along Indian Grave Road between Route 220 and the entrance to the church as recommended by VDOT and deemed necessary to insure that adequate and safe access to the site is provided. These road improvements shall include a design speed of 30 mph, a minimum pavement width of 22 feet with 4 foot wide shoulders and 4 foot wide drainage ditches to the center of the ditch. The improved road shall have a maximum horizontal curve of 22 degrees and a maximum vertical grade of 14 percent. A traffic signal shall be installed at the intersection of Route 220 and Indian Grave Road. 6. The church shall be required to extend public water and sewer to the site and the location of these utilities shall generally be located within the right-of--way of Indian Grave Road. The church shall be authorized for cost reimbursements in accordance with the off-site and oversized utility facilities policy contained in sections 18-168(D) 3 and 4, and 22-82 (B) (1) (c) and (d) of the Roanoke County Code. 7. No access shall be permitted from Franklin Road to the property. 6 County of Roanoke Community Development Planning & Zoning X204 Bernard Drive P O Bo:c 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 (~40) 772-2068 FAX (540) 772-2108 For Staff Use Date received: 31z31o Application fee: ~k0 ~~ ~~ Received by: Tl-I PC/BZA date: inn~yo~ Placards issued: ~~ ~ ,) i,r B 05 date: Case Number ~ y- 5~ Z o o ~ ALL APPLICANTS Check type of application filed (check all that apply) O Rezoning ®Special Use O Variance Applicants name,'address w/zip Trustees Evangel Foursquare Church 612 Bullitt Avenue, SE (Attn: Rev. Ken Wright) Roanoke, VA 240~IB Owner's name/address w/zip Trt~tees _ Eyarigel Foursquare Church 512 Bullitt Avenue, SE Roanoke, VA 24013 Propperty Location 5z100 Block of Indian Grave Road Tax l~1ap No.: 98.02-2-1b Phone: 982-3694 Fax No. 982-8693 Phone 982-3694 _ Fax No. 982-8693 Magisterial District: Cave Community Planning area: Existing Zoning: AR Size of parcel(s)• Acres• 48+- I Existing Land Use: Open RE201VLNG 4iVD SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANTS (RfS) Proposed Zoning: ~ Proposed Land Use: Church and day care facili Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes x~ No O IF NO, A VARIAi~iCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes ~ No O IF NO, A VARL~i~tCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes O No O VARIANCE APPLICANTS,EV) Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WII.L NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE vIISSING OR L~iCONIPLETE. R!S v R'S V R/S V ~^ Consultation X 8 1!2" x 11" concept plan X ~ Application fee X ~ ~ Application Metes and bounds description X Proffers, if applicable Justification Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners I hereby certif;,~ that I am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner. .- ~ ~ --~ ~, /. ' -~,~ •' -._E~ u ,z.._ .`~`._._~j y .---- Owner's Si nature ~ ~= g _ ~ 7STIFICATION TOR REZONING OR SPECIAL tJSE~PERMIT REQUEST ~,.~ Applicant Trustees of Evangel Foursquare Church The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permit requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. This project is a religious assembly facility with a day-care center to be located on a 48+- acre site for Evangel Foursquare Church. The site is located along the east side of Indian Grave Road. This request is for a special use permit for the Master Plan of a Multi-phase building program with an'ultimate size of 43,000 SF with a seating capacity of 500. This facility will aid in the creation of a convenient, attractive and harmonious community and reduce overall land use density and increase the public services to the community through child care. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. Religious assembly facilities and day-care centers are permitted by the zoning ordinances by special use permit and are generally consistent with the comprehensi plan. Street access is available. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parkslrecreation and fire and rescue. The proposed project will have a minimal impact on the adjoining properties with regard to fire rescue. A day-care center which will offer care for infants through age 12 with a before/after school program available to area schools. A gymnasium and outdoor recreational facilities will provide a new service to the community that will compliment the park/recreation services. Traffic along Indian Grave Road will increase with the facility primarily Sunday mornings and evenings. Adequate on-site parking is proposed. Storm water runoff will be contained through a proposed holding pond. f ~ ~ ~ •\ _ ~ \ / '\ ,SJ' (~ M - _ •,~ ' ~~ LL . °,~~~ ~~ ', - Z. ' - N1Q H ` ~1.. ~ T.06 b. ,31 In 0 ~ 4. ~ ~e w.. 1. . ~ tto,K(~) aw ~ r. ~ . _ ~` 1 ~.as b. t .~ a. ti• ~,i•, ,,,,, ,,,, 9a. ~. 21 ~... am ~ ,~. q• •~. "~~ ip «4 ~` tr. e ~+ . - 'irY ~' T 1 .~ 7i .,, ~ .r ~. - " T `i' ,.. - ~'._ ~. t ~r~ 44. ~~ • - ~ - y - s 1J~ Aa +w ls• ,~, . _ - ~ ~ ~a. I ~' ` ~ ry'. r Lsr~ m. ~y ~s 'Ir; ~~•~ 7 S ~ .t2`'' ~ v g : io s ~ ~ , A i~ 1B •~yi._/O _ 1 \ • ~ - ~~ O is ~ - ~3 ~° f °t t ~ ` . r ~.i-. •~~~ •\ { t ~ - t ~ 1 ~ ~ ' .,~ - _ - r . \ \. A 1.4m' ROANOKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF E'vanget Foursquare Church, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT I alfs I ~y ~ r $u.~-- i s -• ~- 1 \\ ~~ ^ \III `III ,11 III ~ `II t{I ' as r~~ t, w ` l III 1 \II I~ ~ -_ I .~ -~fi(Ri I I / 1 1 ____` 1 80 oN~7 r c ~( 1 1 r i t ~ ~ ~ 1 ` i I, ~ \ "" ll 1 I t I _ _ 1 I 1 ~~ ~ fi t of~ Ir ~ ~\ ` ao~ _ r ` ...._ `~\t I VtQs I 11 a; _n9 ~ $4a49 I I 1 ~Z~ ~ ~ 1 i4 I 1 II 1 w M! II 1 1 P 1~ ' Y 1 ~l r ; 8 7 `~1 i ~ ~ r r r t o ~- 1 J ~' ; `' t, X~ 1 ~ ~~~ 1 iI l Du•.¢ it ~ Z7 f .m.mc.. b3 $ ^ti' s o ,,~ : ~ ~:' __ ...: sv ' /'' ~( , ,/ y~ ~ ~ I ~ A;~~rr o /. r/~, irk :l '-.....~ -C~:y- c~ _, a° . _~__-..___"_______ -_ _' _ ___ ____~ ~`c~, _ _ u I c~~ yam, :a- it '-'--~-'_~-~~~' `\ --'-"'" ~ogn~', ~ i c ~ ...-_ _ r .-. ,~,/' ` Yy ~ i ~ • j sly \ spa \ ~ ! Y~7s o~,~ ~ ~ ~L` - KEN~+ETH WRIGHT ~^ _ ~ P'~ ~1ts'I~ ROANOKE COUN`CY. VIRGINIA °"°"°""'"~"~°°"®"'°'° ~~ if 1~ a i~~;'~ ~,; II II i~ t {I'J ',~ 1~ ll~ s ai`. :L' ~.-i ~~I Iii 311 ,~~.. ,._,~; V! al ~_~ al i ~: ~_ ';' .. -;_ ~ G .j v .i Z <z zc Q~ m ~. ~I~ 3~1 ~'~ ^~!~ i (~C~; r / ` ti ~\ ~. n n ~i ~I' ._ L: fl :jr.. Jry i ry~ f 1!I i -;I:. I ~I ~~I d~ . ~~> ~ II ~~I ? ,, ~ I N~ ail; ' ~ I I ql t ~: I i ~~ j ~ I I I I ~ ~~ _..i "' G K C^ 'M1 ..' :,a v,< n :C 'L "~ i~'] ~. ROANOKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEPELOPMENT Applicants Name: Trustees Tsvangel Foursquare Church Zoning: Special Use Proposed zoning AR (Church and day care Tax Map No. 98.02-2- f 6 R- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 26, 2001 ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO THE TRUSTEES OF EVANGEL FOURSQUARE CHURCH FOR THE MASTER PLAN OF A RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY AND A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A DAY CARE CENTER TO BE LOCATED ON 48 ACRES OF AR-ZONED PROPERTY WITH ACCESS FROM THE 5400 BLOCK OF INDIAN GRAVE ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 98.02-2-16), CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, The Trustees of Evangel Foursquare Church have filed a petition for a special use permit for the master plan of a religious assembly and a special use permit for a day care center on 48 acres of AR-zoned property with access from the 5400 block of Indian Grave Road (Tax Map No. 98.02-2-16) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on May 1, 2001 and continued to June 5, 2001; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on Apri124, 2001; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on June 26, 2001. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to The Trustees of Evangel Foursquare Church for the master plan of a religious assembly and a special use permit for a day care center on 48 acres of AR-zoned property will access from the 5400 block of Indian Grave Road (Tax Map No. 98.02-2-16) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 2000 Community Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.2-2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved with the following conditions: (1) The site shall be developed in substantial conformity with the concept plan U : \W PDOCS\AGENDA\ZONING\evangel.4square.sup.wpd ~_i prepared by LMW Engineering & Surveying, dated Apri128, 2000. If final engineering of the site requires extra grading beyond the immediate area for the church, it shall be necessary for the applicant to reapply for a Special Use Permit. (2) The buildings shall be constructed in substantial conformity with the building elevations prepared by Pierson Engineering & Surveying, dated October 20, 1999. (3) The exterior of the buildings and equipment shall be constructed with non- reflective materials and brown and gray colors to reduce the visibility potential from the Parkway and surrounding views. (4) As the site is graded and/or developed, no trees on the site may be removed except for the trees in the immediate path of the driveway to the site from Indian Grave Road, the area for the storm water management facility, the area for the church facilities, day care facilities and parking, playground area and area for the septic drain fields, as shown on the concept plan prepared by LMW Engineering & Surveying dated Apri128, 2000. (5) The church shall undertake all transportation and road improvements along Indian Grave Road between Route 220 and the entrance to the church and at the intersection of Indian Grave Road and Route 220 as required by VDOT and deemed necessary to insure that adequate and safe access to the site is provided. (6) No access shall be permitted from Franklin Road to the property. 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\ZONING\evangel.4square.sup.wpd 2 o~ ?~0AN0~F ~ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~~ _~ Z o ,, z v. a r83a APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~ rC I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: f 1. ~l2 ADDRESS: ~ y ~ d ~ ~.. ~ ~ ~ ! ~`t ~ ~. , ~..~ C~ ~ "~ v (2_._ PHONE: ~.~ `7 ~~- O~ ~OANO,YF ~ AGENDA ITEM NO. uC.~ .~ - Z -~ o ._ J a APPEARANCE REQUEST 1838 ~~PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~\I o~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk writfen authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD ~ ~ ~ ~i ~~ NAME: ~~`~ \ ~ ,1 S a. ~~\V~ t~ To n.y ADDRESS: t3~2 1`I ~A~~ ~• ~y~yA 24~s~ PHONE: 3g7-3~~ o~ aoaNO,~F AGENDA ITEM NO. - ,.M ; Z o :~ai J X838 APPEARANCE REQUEST ~ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk wriften authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: lr~~C/~, ~i '~ ~,~~ ADDRESS: ~.s~ ~ ~~a ~~1~s ~p~® ~~ PHONE: '7'7~,/~- 7 ~~~ a~ P°ANO~F ~ ~ AGENDA ITEM NO. Z ,Z X838 APPEARANCE REQUEST a PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT ~v ,/~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~/'i~S ~~CI~-~''OC~ ADDRESS: ~5'u ~ccwnr~c:~ ~ ~r~v~ ~r/~pYl PHONE: ,~'7O"7-~a~S o~ ?°ANO~F ~ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~~~" .~ ; Z J a? 1838 APPEARANCE REQUEST ,,~ ~~ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~Lir1~zC'~r ~ C.. l~-~.~~Z~ i-~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW. ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: _~~ ~~ ~ ~L ~l~:i ADDRESS: ~`"~ ~ ~~' ~~ fl:~~~ PHONE: ~""~ ~.~- -Z~`-~~- -- o~ pOANO,YF AGENDA ITEM NO. J ~ ~~ _ ~ z ,~ ,83a APPEARANCE REQUEST PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW.- ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk writfen authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~fl22 L.K,,~,~ S 2, J2 ADDRESS: 7P. D PHONE: ~-~~~ t~n~ ~ X95. ~d~- ,2~Fa~ ~ 2- ~`~~~ Page 1 of 6 THIS SEARCH THIS DOCUMENT GO TO Next Hit Forward New Bills Search Prev Hit Back HomePage Hit List Best Sections Help Doc Contents Bi112 of 3 There are 2 other versions of this bill. s version of this bill e erences tot s i m t e Congressional Record i s to t o i Summary & Status file. u isp ay - 14,076 bytes. Hel Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of luuu lr;ngrossen in ~enate~ S 2869 ES 106th CONGRESS 2d Session S. 2869 AN ACT To protect religious liberty, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the 'Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000'. SEC. 2. PROTECTION OF LAND USE AS RELIGIOUS EXERCISE. (a) SUBSTANTIAL BURDENS- (1) GENERAL RULE- No government shall impose or implement a land use regulation in a manner that imposes a substantial burden on the religious exercise of a person, including a religious assembly or institution, unless the government demonstrates that imposition of the burden on that person, assembly, or institution-- (A) is in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest; and (B) is the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling governmental interest. (2) SCOPE OF APPLICATION- This subsection applies in any case in which-- http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c 106:2:./temp/~c 106R3 dc1M:: 8/2/00 Page 2 of 6 ~~ (A) the substantial burden is imposed in a program or activity that receives Federal financial assistance, even if the burden results from a rule of general applicability; (B) the substantial burden affects, or removal of that substantial burden would affect, commerce with foreign nations, among the several States, or with Indian tribes, even if the burden results from a rule of general applicability; or (C) the substantial burden is imposed in the implementation of a land use regulation or system of land use regulations, under which a government makes, or has in place formal or informal procedures or practices that permit the government to make, individualized assessments of the proposed uses for the property involved. (b) DISCRIMINATION AND EXCLUSION- (1) EQUAL TERMS- No government shall impose or implement a land use regulation in a manner that treats a religious assembly or institution on less than equal terms with a nonreligious assembly or institution. (2) NONDISCRIMINATION- No government shall impose or implement a land use regulation that discriminates against any assembly or institution on the basis of religion or religious denomination. (3) EXCLUSIONS AND LIMITS- No government shall impose or implement a land use regulation that-- (A) totally excludes religious assemblies from a jurisdiction; or (B) unreasonably limits religious assemblies, institutions, or structures within a jurisdiction. SEC. 3. PROTECTION OF RELIGIOUS EXERCISE OF INSTITUTIONALIZED PERSONS. (a) GENERAL RULE- No government shall impose a substantial burden on the religious exercise of a person residing in or confined to an institution, as defined in section 2 of the Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act (42 U.S.C. 1997), even if the burden results from a rule of general applicability, unless the government demonstrates that imposition of the burden on that person-- (1) is in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest; and (2) is the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling governmental interest. (b) SCOPE OF APPLICATION- This section applies in any case in which-- (1) the substantial burden is imposed in a program or activity that receives Federal financial assistance; or (2) the substantial burden affects, or removal of that substantial burden would affect, commerce with foreign nations, among the several States, or with Indian tribes. http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c 106:2:./temp/~c 106R3 dc1M:: 8/2/00 Page 3 of 6 ~ SEC. 4. JUDICIAL RELIEF. (a) CAUSE OF ACTION- A person may assert a violation of this Act as a claim or defense in a judicial proceeding and obtain appropriate relief against a government. Standing to assert a claim or defense under this section shall be governed by the general rules of standing under article III of the Constitution. (b) BURDEN OF PERSUASION- If a plaintiff produces prima facie evidence to support a claim alleging a violation of the Free Exercise Clause or a violation of section 2, the government shall bear the burden of persuasion on any element of the claim, except that the plaintiff shall bear the burden of persuasion on whether the law (including a regulation) or government practice that is challenged by the claim substantially burdens the plaintiff s exercise of religion. (c) FULL FAITH AND CREDIT- Adjudication of a claim of a violation of section 2 in a non- Federal forum shall not be entitled to full faith and credit in a Federal court unless the claimant had a full and fair adjudication of that claim in the non-Federal forum. (d) ATTORNEYS' FEES- Section 722(b) of the Revised Statutes (42 U.S.C. 1988(b)) is amended-- (1) by inserting 'the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000,' after 'Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993,'; and (2) by striking the comma that follows a comma. (e) PRISONERS- Nothing in this Act shall be construed to amend or repeal the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (including provisions of law amended by that Act). (f) AUTHORITY OF UNITED STATES TO ENFORCE THIS ACT- The United States may bung an action for injunctive or declaratory relief to enforce compliance with this Act. Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to deny, impair, or otherwise affect any right or authority of the Attorney General, the United States, or any agency, officer, or employee of the United States, acting under any law other than this subsection, to institute or intervene in any proceeding. (g) LIMITATION- If the only jurisdictional basis for applying a provision of this Act is a claim that a substantial burden by a government on religious exercise affects, or that removal of that substantial burden would affect, commerce with foreign nations, among the several States, or with Indian tribes, the provision shall not apply if the government demonstrates that all substantial burdens on, or the removal of all substantial burdens from, similar religious exercise throughout the Nation would not lead in the aggregate to a substantial effect on commerce with foreign nations, among the several States, or with Indian tribes. SEC. 5. RULES OF CONSTRUCTION. (a) RELIGIOUS BELIEF UNAFFECTED- Nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize any government to burden any religious belief. (b) RELIGIOUS EXERCISE NOT REGULATED- Nothing in this Act shall create any basis for restricting or burdening religious exercise or for claims against a religious organization including any religiously affiliated school or university, not acting under color of law. http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c106:2:./temp/~c106R3dc1M:: 8/2/00 Page 4 of 6 ~ (c) CLAIMS TO FUNDING UNAFFECTED- Nothing in this Act shall create or preclude a right of any religious organization to receive funding or other assistance from a government, or of any person to receive government funding for a religious activity, but this Act may require a government to incur expenses in its own operations to avoid imposing a substantial burden on religious exercise. (d) OTHER AUTHORITY TO IMPOSE CONDITIONS ON FUNDING UNAFFECTED- Nothing in this Act shall-- (1) authorize a government to regulate or affect, directly or indirectly, the activities or policies of a person other than a government as a condition of receiving funding or other assistance; or (2) restrict any authority that may exist under other law to so regulate or affect, except as provided in this Act. (e) GOVERNMENTAL DISCRETION IN ALLEVIATING BURDENS ON RELIGIOUS EXERCISE- A government may avoid the preemptive force of any provision of this Act by changing the policy or practice that results in a substantial burden on religious exercise, by retaining the policy or practice and exempting the substantially burdened religious exercise, by providing exemptions from the policy or practice for applications that substantially burden religious exercise, or by any other means that eliminates the substantial burden. (f) EFFECT ON OTHER LAW- With respect to a claim brought under this Act, proof that a substantial burden on a person's religious exercise affects, or removal of that burden would affect, commerce with foreign nations, among the several States, or with Indian tribes, shall not establish any inference or presumption that Congress intends that any religious exercise is, or is not, subject to any law other than this Act. (g) BROAD CONSTRUCTION- This Act shall be construed in favor of a broad protection of religious exercise, to the maximum extent permitted by the terms of this Act and the Constitution. (h) NO PREEMPTION OR REPEAL- Nothing in this Act shall be construed to preempt State law, or repeal Federal law, that is equally as protective of religious exercise as, or more protective of religious exercise than, this Act. (i) SEVERABILITY- If any provision of this Act or of an amendment made by this Act, or any application of such provision to any person or circumstance, is held to be unconstitutional, the remainder of this Act, the amendments made by this Act, and the application of the provision to any other person or circumstance shall not be affected. SEC. 6. ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE UNAFFECTED. Nothing in this Act shall be construed to affect, interpret, or in any way address that portion of the first amendment to the Constitution prohibiting laws respecting an establishment of religion (referred to in this section as the 'Establishment Clause'). Granting government funding, benefits, or exemptions, to the extent permissible under the Establishment Clause, shall not constitute a violation of this Act. In this section, the term 'granting', used with respect to s government funding, benefits, or exemptions, does not include the denial of government .% funding, benefits, or exemptions. SEC. 7. AMENDMENTS TO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM RESTORATION ACT. http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c 106:2:./temp/~c 106R3dc1M:: 8/2/00 Page 5 of 6 .~ (a) DEFINITIONS- Section 5 of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (42 U.S.C. 2000bb-2) is amended-- (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ' a State, or a subdivision of a State' and inserting ' or of a covered entity'; (2) in paragraph (2), by striking 'term' and all that follows through 'includes' and inserting 'term 'covered entity' means'; and (3) in paragraph (4), by striking all after 'means' and inserting 'religious exercise, as defined in section 8 of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000.'. (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT- Section 6(a) of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (42 U.S.C. 2000bb-3(a)) is amended by striking 'and State'. SEC. 8. DEFINITIONS. In this Act: (1) CLAIMANT- The term 'claimant' means a person raising a claim or defense under this Act. (2) DEMONSTRATES- The term 'demonstrates' means meets the burdens of going forward with the evidence and of persuasion. (3) FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE- The term 'Free Exercise Clause' means that portion of the first amendment to the Constitution that proscribes laws prohibiting the free exercise of religion. (4) GOVERNMENT- The term 'government'-- (A) means-- (i) a State, county, municipality, or other governmental entity created under the authority of a State; (ii) any branch, department, agency, instrumentality, or official of an entity listed in clause (i); and (iii) any other person acting under color of State law; and (B) for the purposes of sections 4(b) and 5, includes the United States, a branch, department, agency, instrumentality, or official of the United States, and any other person acting under color of Federal law. (5) LAND USE REGULATION- The term 'land use regulation` means a zoning or landmarking law, or the application of such a law, that limits or restricts a claimant's use or development of land (including a structure affixed to land), if the claimant has an ownership, leasehold, easement, servitude, or other property interest in the regulated land or a contract or option to acquire such an interest. http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c 106:2:./temp/~c 106R3dc1M:: 8/2/00 Page 6 of 6 ~ ~ ti ~ (6) PROGRAM OR ACTIVITY- The term 'program or activity' means all of the operations of any entity as described in paragraph (1) or (2) of section 606 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d-4a). (7) RELIGIOUS EXERCISE- Passed the Senate July 27, 2000. Attest: Secretary. S. 2869 AN ACT To protect religious liberty, and for other purposes. (A) IN GENERAL- The term 'religious exercise' includes any exercise of religion, whether or not compelled by, or central to, a system of religious belief. (B) RULE- The use, building, or conversion of real property for the purpose of religious exercise shall be considered to be religious exercise of the person or entity that uses or intends to use the property for that purpose. 106th CONGRESS 2d Session THIS SEARCH Next Hit Prev Hit Hit List THIS DOCUMENT Forward Back Best Sections Doc Contents GO TO New Bills Search HomePage Help 1 http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c106:2:./temp/~c106R3dcIM:: 8/2/00 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JUNE 26, 2001 ORDINANCE 062601-10 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 7.94-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED ON PEACEFUL DRIVE (ROUTE 821) (A PORTION OF TAX MAP N0.72.02-2-3.2) IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF I-2 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF AR WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD A. HALL WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on May 22, 2001, and the second reading and public hearing were held June 26, 2001; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on June 5, 2001; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a portion of a 12.56-acre tract of real estate, containing 7.94 acres and as described herein, and located on Peaceful Drive (Route 821) (a portion of Tax Map Number 72.02-2-3.2) in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of I-2, Industrial District, to the zoning classification of AR, Agriculture/Residential District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Richard A. Hall. 3. That the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing the following condition which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts: (1) The development will be limited to two (2) residential building lots. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: 1 Beginning at Point No. 1 on the north side of Peaceful Drive (Rte. 821); said point being approximately 500 feet east of the intersection of Rte. 821 with Rte. 813; said point being corner to the property of Randall B. and Connie G. Thomas and the property herein described; thence leaving Point No. 1 with aline between the Thomas property and the property herein described N. 17 deg. 59' 00" W. 214.52 feet to Point No. 2; thence continuing with the Thomas property and the property herein described S. 59 deg. 04' 35" W. 216.19 feet to Point No. 3 on the line of the Effie Maude St.Clair property; thence with the line between the St.Clair property and the Richard A. Hall property and the property described herein N. 19 deg. 25' 40" W. 857.47 feet to Point No. 4, corner to the property of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors; thence with a line between the property of the Board of Supervisors and the property herein described S. 72 deg. 35' 25" E. 622.34 feet to Point No. 5; thence with a proposed zoning line S. 12 deg. 11' 05' E. 611.74 feet to Point No. 7 on the north side of Peaceful Drive; thence with the north side of Peaceful Drive S. 57 deg. 44' 30" W. 220.00 feet to Point No. 1, the Point of Beginning, and being the westerly portion of a 12.564 acre tract and containing 7.964 acres and designated as Tract "A" and being as shown on plat for rezoning for Richard A. Hall and Barbara S. Hall by T. P. Parker & Son, dated March 13, 2001. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Church to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Holt n, CMC Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors 2 cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Janet Scheid, Senior Planner William E. Driver, Director, Real Estate Valuation Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 3 3. 11.az Ac. A. E. P. Co. /e" X11. ,v'' D` ~~ ~~ 3. 4~ 1 cr 9 3.73 Ac. 11.1 15. ~ z.as A<. 60 12. 11 18 . 1.1 Ac. 7.59 Ac. 3.35 Pc Ac. L 1 2 _ a 5 Ac. 13. 14' 17. z.9z Ac. 1.1e x. 16. 1.68 Ac. 1.39 Ac. _._ ___ ,5 25. ~, ~ ~4. m 1.zi Ac. 1 AC. ,. 'IS 29.2 6.D8 Ac.(D) 6.74 Ac. C 29.1 2.91 Ac. 26. 1.52 Ac. S.1 0 83 Ac. B. S. Woter Treomenf P/ont 8. \~ M.(D) .><.(c) 3.2 1z s4 A:. 7.96 Ac. ~t (s) ~ 7. e~~y1 a° 4e 5' 1: o AC. 6. 1.93 Ac. Ac. ~1l ,a g>L. `O ~ ao~ 27. g 2oe6 ~ 29, 5.64 Ac. ~~~ 4"`~ /. ~ ROANOKE COUNTY Applicants name: Richard A. HaZL DEPARTMENT OF '' Rezoning COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 'Proposed Zoning: AR `Tax Map No. 72.02-2-3.2 PETITIONER: Richard A. Hall ~- CASE NUMBER: 17-6/2001 Planning Commission Hearing Date: June 5, 2001 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: June 26, 2001 A. REQUEST This is a petition to rezone 7.94 acres of a 12.56-acre parcel from I-2 to AR, for the creation of two (2) residential building lots on Peaceful Drive. In addition the applicant is proposing to relocate his construction business to the remaining I-2 zoned portion of the parcel. The property is located in the Catawba Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS No citizens spoke. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION Mr. Murphy presented the staff report. Mr. Witt inquired about the possible number of lots that could be created in the AR zoning district. Ms. Hooker commended the applicant on the way he worked with the neighbors. D. PROFFERED CONDITIONS 1. The development will be limited to two (2) residential building lots. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Ms. Hooker made a motion to give a favorable recommendation to the rezoning with the proffered condition. The motion passed 5-0. F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map Staff Report _ Other Ja et~Scheid, Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commission ~.. r- STAFF REPORT PETITIONER: Richard A. Hall PREPARED BY: John Murphy CASE NUMBER: 17-6/2001 DATE: June 5, 2001 PARTI A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This petition is a request to rezone 7.96 acres of a 12.56-acre parcel from I-2 to AR for the creation of two (2) Agricultural Residential building lots for single-family homes for the applicant and his family. The remaining 4.6-acre tract would be for the development of the applicant's construction business. The property is designated as Principal Industrial and is located in the Glenvar Community Planning Area and Catawba Magisterial District. B. DESCRIPTION This petition is a request to rezone 7.96 acres of a 12.56-acre parcel from I-2 to AR for the creation of two (2) residential building lots. The remaining I-2 parcel would be used for the operation of the applicant's family-owned business, Kumis Construction, Incorporated, currently located in Montgomery County. The applicant has indicated four (4) phases of development in the concept plan. Phase I : 2001-2001 Build homes for owners of Kumis Construction, Inc. Phase II : 2002-2003 Build storage and warehouse for business. Phase III : 2003-2004 Build office space and showroom for customer print viewing and scheduling. Phase IV : 2004-2005 Construct additional storage space for construction vehicles and equipment. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS The I-2, Industrial District, does not provide for new residential uses but does allow for construction yards. The minimum lot size in the AR Zoning District, with well and septic systems is one (1) acre with 110 feet of publicly owned and maintained road frontage. The minimum lot size with either public water or sewer service is 30, 000 square feet and with both public water and sewer 25, 000 square feet. Building permits shall be required for the construction of residential dwelling units. Site plan review shall be required for the development of the industrial site to insure compliance with all Roanoke County and VDOT standards. Should well and septic systems be used, Health Department approval would be required. VDOT shall require residential entrance permits for residential lots and a commercial entrance permit for the I-2 zoned parcel. Shared entrances may be required. ~- e~l PART II A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Location -The subject property fronts on the 6100 block of Peaceful Drive in the Glenvar area immediately to the west of the Roanoke County Water Treatment Facility. Topogra~hy/Ve etg~ ation - The site is very heavily wooded with mature trees. The Peaceful Drive side of the property begins at road grade and steeply slopes upward to the north. There is a 100-foot AEP easement crossing the entire parcel encumbering approximately three (3) acres. Surrounding Neighborhood - The property is located north of Peaceful Drive (State Route 821). Immediately to the east of the subject property is 29 acres of I-2 zoned property owned by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors housing the water treatment facility. The subject parcel does not have road frontage on West Main Street. Across Peaceful Drive from the property is a 112-acre, I-2 zoned parcel, owned by American Electric Power. On the southwest corner and entire western side of the parcel are several lots zoned AR. The lots on the southwest corner each have residential uses. B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Access -Access to the proposed lots would be from Peaceful Drive. VDOT may recommend shared entrances from Peaceful Drive. Fire & Rescue/Utilities -Fire and rescue services would continue as presently served. Public water and sewer may be extended to the site with some minor extensions. C. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY COMMUNITY PLAN The subject property is designated as Principal Industrial in the 1998 Roanoke County Community Plan. Principal Industrial is a future land use area where a variety of industry types are encouraged to locate. Principal Industrial areas are existing and planned regional employment centers and are distributed throughout the county, convenient to major residential areas and suitable highway access. Some examples of encouraged use types are small industries and custom manufacturing, mining and extraction, industrial parks and conventional freestanding industrial uses, warehouses, wholesalers and storage yards. The subject property and surrounding areas are within the Community Plan's West County Economic Opportunity Area. This identification of the area as an Economic Opportunity Area may serve as the first step of potentially reserving the zoning designation of the property to allow the County necessary land resources to remain competitive in the economic development market. D. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Site plan review would be required for the development of the industrial site to insure compliance with all County development standards. PART III ¢' A. STAFF CONCLUSIONS The applicant has submitted a rezoning request that scaled back the original concept of rezoning the entire parcel to AR. After approaching planning staff approximately 18 months ago with a concept plan of rezoning the entire 12.56 acres from I-2 to AR, for residences, staff discussed with the applicant the inconsistencies with the 1998 Community Plan. The area is identified as Principal Industrial and the development of residential uses within this land use designation is not supported by the Community Plan. The area is also included as part of the West County Economic Opportunity Area which allows the County the ability to preserve the industrial zoning designation for potential future economic development opportunities. The approval of the rezoning would eliminate some I-2 zoned property to be used for anon-economic development purpose. There are several features however, that do not make this single parcel a top choice for industrial development. The terrain is mountainous and would require extensive work to prepare the site for industrial development. Another restriction that limits full development of this site is the 100-foot wide AEP easement encumbering approximately 3 acres of the parcel on the northern side of the property. The Department of Economic Development was not opposed to the rezoning as long as the remaining acreage remained industrial. There are no future plans to expand the water treatment facility or expand in this direction. The relocation of the applicant's construction business to Roanoke County, on the I-2 portion of the parcel is consistent with the Community Plan recommendation of supporting and storage yards in the I-2 district. Should the Planning Commission support the applicant's request staff recommends that a proffer should be required limiting the number of residential building lots. Caunr~~ of Roanoke Catnrnunity Development Planxung t~ ~aItiI1.E 5?p~ Bernard Drive P 4 Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 2~O1S-0798 {5~C)) 772-20b8 FAQ (5~-CJ) 772-2IU8 L'.~~ Cr-.ff Tice (l my Date re^yeived: Received by: - i l - ~ 1 l n-~.-- App~~arion lee: ~ ~, PCrSZ.~, dare: ' ~, a `~ 2 0`, Placards issue:!: ~ i I BOS dare: C;ise Number ~ ~(- ~p Q Q (2- d. ,ALL APPLICrLNTS j Check type of application filed tcheck all that apply) Rezoning ~ Special Use ~ Variance 380-2607 3142607 {cell} Applicants nameraddress wiziP Richard A. Hall Phone•--_ ___ _ _________ &273 Joyce Lane 380-2607 (fax) Salem, Va. 24153 Fax No. __ _ _ _ _ _ ~ Richard A. Hal! Phone: 384-2607 3142607 {cell) ' s nameiaddress wizip - -- --- Owner 6arbara S. Halt i 6273 Joyce Lane Fax ~;~, 380-2607 (fax} _. ______ Salem, Va 24153 ba t C aw a Property Location ~.I.agisterial District: i Peaceful Drive (Rte_ 821) ,~' ~ Community Piannin area ! ` Tas :'vlap No.: 72.02-02-03.2 $ I Existing zoning: !-2 _ { p -.. 7.864 Size of arcel(s}: Au. es: Exxistina Land Use: Agriculture! ~ ,.. ,, 4 ItEZt,~IVFNG A1VD SPECK Z7SE P`ERiYI'IT'fSPP~iCT'S CRtS} ~'~ ~~ Proposed Zoning: Proposed Land (.se: Residential ~ Does th parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district`? Yes ~ No D IF NO, A VARIAl'+TCE I5 REQUIRED FIRST. ~ Flo ~ ~ I Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes I IF N4, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST i ~ ~ Na If rezanine request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes 1 I i y~R1AtVCE ~PPLICA~YTS (V}` i Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke Caunry Zoning Ordinance in order to: j I Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WII:L N©T BE ACCEPTED IF ANY GF TRESE ITEi1~IS ARE iViISSLNG C}R Il`dCOIYIPLETE. ~ ~ I ~ Consultation M 8 1/2" x 1 I" concept plan ( Applir:ation ree !~ Application I lvletes and hounds description Proffers, if applicable ~~i ~ Justiticado^ Water and sewer application ~ / j Adjoining property owners . I hereby certif~f that I am either the owner of th~,e.~roperrr or the awtters agent r contract purchaser and atn acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner. ~f ,~ -' r ,/, ~ r .-- ~ J Owner's Signature ~. I ;3~iiSTIF'IOATIt?N ~'OR REZONING" OR 5Pi/CTE~:~ tiSE PERi1!~tT Richard A, Hall Aoolicant _ ~i -a, Tne Planning Corrunission ~viil study rezoning and special use pernut reuuests to determine the need and justification Tor ~e change in terms of public Health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thorougHi~? as possible. [:'se additional space if necessary. Please e:tplain how the request Furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 3t?-~) as well as the purpose fount at the beQitutin« of the applicable zoning district ctassi;•icazion in the Zoning Ordinance. 1Ne purchased this land to protect the Agricultural Residential setting of properties adjoining this tract, It is also our intent to live and have our business at this location, (See Concept Plan-Kumis Const., Inc.}. The adjoining Agricultural Residential property owners and t do feel that a portion ofi this tract {7.964 acres) that parallels their properties be rezoned would be in the best interest of the landowners and surround~~~rea. The remaining 4.6 acres be left zoned l-2 for the purpose of relocating Kumis Const., Inc. from their Montgomery County location {tronto}. Please eeplain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke Count4~ Con~tnunity Plan. Developing the land along Peaceful Drive would allow for the clean-up of fallen trees and underbrush, thus making the area more eye appealing. (See attached exhibi# "A"}, Most of this land would be left in its natural setting. Only areas needed for construction of buildings and parking would Ix cleared. We also feel that developing this area of Peaceful Drive would add to the visual deterrent of illegal dumping along this section of roadway and would add to the beauty of the county. (See Exhibit °B"}. Please descril7e the irripact(sj of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as welt as the impacts on public services and facilities, inciudina water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue.. Since this land adjoins residential property to theme and the west, developing this portion for residential use should add to the value of the adjoining properties. There should be minimal impact on traffic flow in this area {approx, 30 vehicles one way per day}. The impact on frre and rescue should also be minimal. Each tract is to have its own well and septic system; if this is not possible, water and sewer lines could be extended to this area at owners expense. {See letter fram Roanoke County Utility Department}. (:-a. TB EXHI13tT q ~- ~i~.. . , , k , . ~~°~ ['~ ~~ ~$ - ~~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~~ #~~ ~~~ ~ ~~~~ 3~~ ~~ ~ ~- ~ ~ :s ~~ ~ ~~ ~A ~~ ~, ~~ ~~ ~ K~ ~ ~ d ~ Y /' fi' ,; ;® ~ 4"~ ~ ~ '~ / ~ V2 ~ ® ~ a ~ e- ,moA~~a w ear d~ .. ~~~ r 1 ~-- ~d- G. Q __._ ~ itd'L W 31f7 ~dOZld f M .9Rt/~t N ~#i / l , ~ ~ f ! :~ ~ 4 u "~` LTa z 1 .~' N 19~'~ RR ~ C.. X.~ ~q T $'$ ~~ ~ ~~ s ~ ~, ~~ 4 ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~a~ .~ ri~ ~' ~~ ~~ _ &: R-~. ~I ~ ~ 1', ~~ ~~ ,- _ •~ ~_ 8 ~~~ r ~q b .'~ d ~r '~ t~~ {~ 0 ~ ~~ O H ~ ; ~~ i~~ ~ .:~t~ ,~~ . ~_ ~ ~~ ~~~~ ~& ~~~ ga~ ~ f~ ~_ v ~~ 0 b it 8 ~~ ~~ 1~-~ CONCEPT PLAN AFTER REZONING: PHASE I: 2001-2002 Build homes for owners of Kumis Const., Inc. PHASE II: 2002-2003 Build 32' x 50' garage for storage and warehouse. PHASE III: 2003-2004 Build office space and showroom for customer print viewing and scheduling (approx. 1000 sq. ft. ). PHASE IV: 2004-2005 Add on additional storage space to garage for vehicles and equipment. ~-a scr~[~nuz..E ~.... z s Commi tment No. S1iT-{7871 FA Exceptions JchedUie B of the polity oC paliciae to be ~ssacd '++ili tantain exceptions to the foiloein8 pxiter9 unless `he ~~me ire disposed ai to r.he satsiactinn of the Caapsny. i, DafzCts, Bans, encusptences, adverse claias ar other natters, if any, crested, first avpearinR is the public records or attaching sxhsequert Ca the erfeetive date hereof but print to the date the prapn~ee insured 3CgUiLeS fnr value ~f *ccard the estaie Qr interest or aurtgage thereon raverea by conmit~ent. ?. Tsxes for the first half c)f 1999 and subsequent pears. 3. Restrictions and other matters, if any, appearing of record in Deed Book 1392, Page 1472. NOTE: This exception omits 4n3r covenant, condir.ion or z-estrictiora bssed ozx rsce, color ~"E?~.ia°,ion, sexy handicap, familial stratus or national ori;~i.n as prov~i_ded in 42 U.S.C, Section 3604, unless azxd onlp to the extent thta.t the couQ'naT1t (a) is zunt in vio7.ation of state or federal ia~w, {b} ~s exempt under ~S2 U.S.C. Section 3607, or i c; } relates to a k~andicsp, but does not discriminate: against handica . :}. Easements granted ~.s follows: ~ ic- ~.sgznia from B. T, Pendleton, dated 11j17/95~ recorded iz1 Deed Book k492, page 865_ b ) ApPa.lachian Power Company from ,john K. Heslep arzd t~.annie J. Heslep, dated C19f25j58, recorded in Deed Book 60::, pa,g~e 3Z4. c) Appalachian EJ.actric Power C©mpany from J- K• Heslep and Van J. Heslep, dated (12/28/52, recorded in Deed Book X71, pale 380. d) p,ppalachian Electric power Company from J. K, Heslep and Sian J. Heslep: dated D4foa/35, recorded in Deed Book 235, pale 182. e} Appalachian Electric Po~c.rer Company from J. K. Heslep anc Nan. J. Heslep, dated U7/14j2ta, recorded in Deed Book 178, pages b. f j App~,la,ckiian Power. Company from tl. J. Heslep, J, K. Heslep and tJ, ,7. Heslep, da~,ted 03/18J12, recorded in Deed Book 6Q, page 445, 5. Reservation. of easement i0fl' in tridt~i, for transmission line and toner, located along the northerly side of property as ,rlore ps,rticulariy set forth in Decd Book 1392, Page 14"r2• g. A~i.~hts or claims of parties in possession and ease b undar3 claims of easements not shown by the pxikalic records, line disputes, overlaps, encroachments, and any matters noL of rer.ord which would be disclosed by an accurate sur'vep ~nr insper. t~. i. on of the prem:i.ses . ::e~ri i_ i.nued . '- -~... .~ ~ ~~ r b ~~ _.~..~.•_-_._ - -. ~. - .` 1 r,. /' 1 j ~.~ '~~ '~ i' r'~ _. r.• g ~• // 1 r' ~ •'~ ~ \ - - - ~-~_._ ~ \ t ~ \ _ o ~ ~ 1 ~~ '~ ~ to .~ ~ ~`~~ / I .. ~ •. R~ ~ ~ ., .~ :' \ ~ ~~ .~ ~ s d t R 4i = ~~: ___......__...-- ADO '~._._.~ i J A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ a ~ ~' ~ . J , ~ ~~~ + ~ \ ~I m.~ ..__---... ~ ~ '. O j ' ~ ac u ` ~~~ =~ B ~,$ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~~ ~ a 3 ~ ~.. 8Z ~ :t ai ash ~• d ~ i Vii. ~ is ~ m, ~ 9 m 1 q ~ er` ~ ~ rr m, R ~~~ ¢ ~ 1 ,. ~ ~ ~~0 m,~ $ .mow ~ ~ ~ , ~ =~ i °;; ~ = i .~ t r-- ~ ~ t /~ ' , ~ f i '' 1 m, s :~ ~ '' ~ e ~' 1 ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ \ • ~ ~~, _- r it ,. .`~' r _ J/r ~ !1. J;~~ ., i ( - ~.•4~ ~' i. ',. f i. '^ti; r ,may'l ~ (~i ~V} ~~ ,- f ,'t !l i t~ ~ .}! ~,, ,y~ i a f, , 1 R' ~~ vti ~' r= ~, i t+ 1 \\ 1 z r1 ~ ~ \~\t~~ J . f~l,-Q~ j ~ -1~''~~i r ~~ ~1/ +`~~ IF~~r ~jf' ~ '7 j/~_ '- liE 11 ~ \` ~~ i !F~ 1 \~ ~ F~1 ~ % qF - l' , Ij f ,~,,,~~iJJJ""' ~ / I1 f.}k; - 1 ~ , tt rt ~t ~ } ~,, ~`~ . ~~~, \, ~ ' ', r ( -~ • { ~i~f"s~. iii i. ±' ~ t '~ ~ ~9' \ \ i ~ ~, ,~, t: t•v n ~' ~ ~ (' ! ~~ (( '~ >, ~_~s , v ~ ~ ~~~ . >! % ~~,_.~} f' f ~ [~1(~!1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 i Fri ~ ~q ~1~~ ~"+' ~,\ `~~ .~ _ ~ r Irv--~ ~. / ~ ~` f '~r;~ ~ ~ k Fii r u ~ \ J ~ ~\ ~ ~ 1 ~ ; --1y~ if ~- ; ~. / ~) 1 r,'t \ ^ ~~~% ~~ - ~ ~ r ! i to t ~1 I fl~~ ~~'~/ l~F- ~ or-.~ ~ I ~ ~ Cul ~ //Fr 1 *r v 5 ~, .: / .~, I !t f!'f i ~ ~ ~ ~il~ ~ ~~~ I ! "-~' F1~~ f, // ~11~1 i~(~ ~ ~y//r I. ° • •• / r ,_ f 7` I ! ~'~ f ~~t !'C3/j-'../ ~~ 3~r.~ ~•"~' Ar J`~af ~~~~ ! a(~F!? i ftN~ ~ ! ~ i~ ~1 r •I F! ~'~ sI r~ 1s3, I+~ ~i ~r !~: f r s',-- t /t/f' l..!r>r (ir ~ I~ li ~ yr•+,} .~,`, ~~ f r -' j ~' : / Vr ' ~ /~~ i ~~i/.~ j~ i /7 jj J" >, ~, ~ [i- "i~tt,~ c,~ _,~~~11 ~t~ ~(il~~ i .' r/i it ~' ~~~,, ~~ . ~ -r 1 y ' ~--~ V! ~,1 t 1il~i ~r ~,~~~4 t f i~F ~ ~i'~/ J-~f JJtt; ,~1t.lr~lrsaZ f ~`"' \V'~ t .ate' -- _a- ~ F ! ,~ ~ -~' -a, '~}! ~)d~,}i~ i~'~'.~ '':i f r~~! ~~ll yj rl 1`~=~ ~ ~~! ~}~ __ ~/._ F ''~aairv~, ~ ' j~ ~kr/r F ~~ !~ _ , ~ ~ ~~~ ~ r~ _ ~ ,~ _. i q ) . ~ ,7 ~ i f • t C }rye 1 51 ~ rr ~ }} ~~~.,..[~ ' ~~'-=-.~ ~ \ , 7) il;, l 1 ~ l~ t~l ~\ ~.. CY~ ~, ,. ~ ,.T- ! ~, ,, ail t~ ,-n '` t~ t, ~~ ~ ~- _ ~"'/ ~`~r ~ =_.. ~~;~lJ r ~, \ r;. -pia. --., \ ~ t r~k~ r s " `` ~,yf l1 _ _ _ r ! F ~!l ~f _ __ \~ ~I J tti1/ I'! ~ ~tr \ `4 .~~ J A t 1 ~ r i e'~-/~_~{_~. r ~'!^ ~~„ -r.. r ~~'1x v- - _ - „J o \ r \ 'y "~ ~ ..fix,- - -''tF_ Q _ - ,_, _ , J •~ ~ ~ , _. _` l ~ ~ '' ~ ,~ f~ ! / ;~,..--r..~.-. f ti ~- ~ ..N_a'^,''~- ~'~ `` a ,y~~. - ~, ~ fr ! j - f ry ~ a ~ _. _.:~.~[,,, Y-~ ¢ ,` iTt"\~ ~•~ ~^r ~'"i`~' ?~t~-,, rV~;'~'"`` ~`'~~\\ ^~!~ ~'\\ ~'~\ 1 f •. / y} t ' ,(/r/ --._(t iLu -\ ~r. i ~ ~-~,~~~ \.,..t-v.,~~ \<...-.,,; •'! .1- x°f ~--~ a l ~~~' ~ ~yli`';~ ~~~y{~ ~~- ,,~`i~~\ \c i f ~ i i J j ,r• .y 'fir / r-'" I ~ { v~` \ \ ~i \ : ~/ ` !j 1 ( f a ~~ ~,~ r{ ,,._-- '. -_,,a ~~ 1 f~L `VY 'Fr ~~ ~ \-~~y~~/~~~ \ S\\ t ~ h \\~\~. \} !i r" 1~ f~( \ ~ 1 ~~ -~ f{ ' ^ S\ 5~/~ ~lt% ~ it/1~~\ i ,'~ 1 ! ~~' ~.-^{\\~\-~.~---- _ti ~~ rt/,~ t J/ ~W 4 ~ ; ji ~ , ~ l ~ t„ .. a w~- ~--' ~.' if ) ~ F ! \ \ < 'y"..--~ ^--•---~"; ~_..~•' ~ 1 J - /ill r..,1 ~ i !f (.~, ! ~~*'~ \\ `^.\ J~r IF J,. y~ i i +} rr i i 1. _ ,r. 1r ,s . I ~ ~ / !r fs ~.'> ,~/ ~ fl fl ,~lr ,( `' 'k- . '~ ~ `~~. f r ~ ~ i! 1 i ~ . ~x ~. T• '~ ~ \~ j F r i . Y r C3 ' {frt~ ~ ~ ~..~ f r J t~ ~~ 1~~/ yA, 1 jr i -• ~ _ i;.'~f % (~ ~1 c t', R~~r" ~.r^~ ~ ~ r ~;~,1" 'r t \i ~ / f~ /l ~i !y~'jli -'~ £ ~~F! ', 1 f ^~'` y..'' 1~~ll "~'r-- / -,~ ~~`'ts, I~t ! ~/ I N~ ,/ ~~ i` `~ ``. J ~~I Q S {.L W Z J W O a F- U Q H ~_ h- LL. NWN 4b U a M O a a a ti h ~~~ {~,:;~ r +'r `~ f ~i ~„ H ~ h.~. q e f1 ty ~~ ~''' zti`~ ~' ~~~ ~ ; T, ;~ g {h ~~ L ~"~ 5 ~~ a ~ i r~, a ~~yy, ~ '4 ~ f ~: 4~ 17 ~ ~ ` k yZ'~ 5~ f ~ ~~ t h $~b., ; d~~ fi: rr a ~~ , ~ ~ ~~ ] ~. _ ~ x L -~ '~+,'': rte- ~r~ Y" sw - ~„~ y, zY ,.~ ~ y,~ ~?'~ """ "` ~: ~, : ~~ ~' -~: ~~ ~~ ~~~;n;:: ~~.~' Fes, ,~* ~~°; ~'M ~ 4 ~, t '~ ~ ~~ N `i ~~ -l" ~ ~+` ~~ ~~t t~ 3 ` ``. -'y 4 ~,, ~ i ~~.t ~ i . . }~ 7 k ~~ ~ ~~. ~t nM ~ ,. r ~} ~ ~ iti a „ ~- ~, >,,~ u~ ~.r t a . ~~`'S'x ~ ~ :~, ", ~T r, "t ~p .. ~ yt ' r' ~ i~h+ 7 r~ hfi ~ ~ ',~yi w id ~ ~ '~ ~ 1 ~~A ~~' ~ ~' # ~trt 7 f ~ N ~,~ ~ ~. ~ :;,fit , '~~ ,. . e 3.4 43 Ac. w h~ 1.06 Ac. ~~ ~ h. N ~+f 5. 10. ~ t n~. 1.02 Pc. 3 14. z.zo rec. 122.9 c. 9S ti 11.1 '`'~ a>> •Se h u~11..4 ,~' X60 a ~~ ~ ~ ~. 3-~. 6.15 Ac. G~ ~1~ 4. NN 0~' 8.2 ~e 3. t 1.a2 Ac. A. E. P. Co. 29.2 29, - 6.64 Ac. 6.08 P.c.(D) 6.74 Ac. C 29.1 2.91 Ac. ROANOKE COUNTY Applicants name: Richard A. Hall DEPARTMENT OF ,Rezoning COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Proposed Zoning: AR Tax Map No. 72.02-2-3.2 -a. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JUNE 26, 2001 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 7.94-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED ON PEACEFUL DRIVE (ROUTE 821) (A PORTION OF TAX MAP NO. 72.02-2-3.2) IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF I-2 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF AR WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD A. HALL WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on May 22, 2001, and the second reading and public hearing were held June 26, 2001; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on June 5, 2001; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a portion of a 12.56-acre tract of real estate, containing 7.94 acres and as described herein, and located on Peaceful Drive (Route 821) (a portion of Tax Map Number 72.02-2-3.2) in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of I-2, Industrial District, to the zoning classification of AR, Agriculture/Residential District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Richard A. Hall. 3. That the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing the following condition which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts: (1) The development will be limited to two (2) residential building lots. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\ZONING\hall.richard.rzn.frm 1 /2- .~ Beginning at Point No. 1 on the north side of Peaceful Drive (Rte. 821); said point being approximately 500 feet east of the intersection of Rte. 821 with Rte. 813; said point being corner to the property of Randall B. and Connie G. Thomas and the property herein described; thence leaving Point No. 1 with a line between the Thomas property and the property herein described N. 17 deg. 59' 00" W. 214.52 feet to Point No. 2; thence continuing with the Thomas property and the property herein described S. 59 deg. 04' 35" W. 216.19 feet to Point No. 3 on the line of the Effie Maude St.Clair property; thence with the line between the St.Clair property and the Richard A. Hall property and the property described herein N. 19 deg. 25' 40" W. 857.47 feet to Point No. 4, corner to the property of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors; thence with a line between the property of the Board of Supervisors and the property herein described S. 72 deg. 35' 25" E. 622.34 feet to Point No. 5; thence with a proposed zoning line S. 12 deg. 11' OS' E. 611.74 feet to Point No. 7 on the north side of Peaceful Drive; thence with the north side of Peaceful Drive S. 57 deg. 44' 30" W. 220.00 feet to Point No. 1, the Point of Beginning, and being the westerly portion of a 12.564 acre tract and containing 7.964 acres and designated as Tract "A" and being as shown on plat for rezoning for Richard A. Hall and Barbara S. Hall by T. P. Parker & Son, dated March 13, 2001. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\ZONING\hall.richazd.rzn.frm 2 s r, ~~ Y,. ,, AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 26, 2001 ORDINANCE 062601-11 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO JAMES AND SANDRA WORLEY FOR A PRIVATE STABLE TO BE LOCATED AT 4390 HARBORWOOD ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 74.00-1-8.4), CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, James and Sandra Worley have filed a petition for a special use permit for a private stable to be located at 4390 Harborwood Road (Tax Map No. 74.00-1-8.4) in the Catawba Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on June 5, 2001; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on May 22, 2001; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on June 26, 2001. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to James and Sandra Worley for a private stable to be located at 4390 Harborwood Road (Tax Map No. 74.00-1-8.4) in the Catawba Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 2000 Community Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.2-2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved with the following condition: (1) There will be a maximum of three (3) horses on the property. 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Church to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ~~i~LQ.~ti~ ~ ~~ Brenda J. Holton, CMC Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Janet Scheid, Senior Planner William E. Driver, Director, Real Estate Valuation Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 2 P_ ~-t" ~ 5600 0~ ~ 2s ~o ~ 6 5628 v '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ Q ~' ~ v Q 8.~ 1 0 ~~ o ~~ 4452 Q~ ~ - ~ v 5 ~ ~ 8 4444 cV ~ ~° ~ _ ~ . ~ ~. W `-566 ~ 97.7 v~ ~ ~ 5640 ~ ~ C~j~ 4410 N ~ <`~ ~ ~ G 5672 23O(S) 9.69 Ac. ~.~ 5656 ~.~ 4.73 Ac. 1 4.390 . 4378 ~- 3.51 Ac - ~.1~ ~ 1 ~Ac_ 2 . ~0 A j ROANOKE COUNTY ~ Applicants name: James & Sandroc Worley DEPARTMENT OF Zoning: Special Use COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Proposed Zoning: R-1 ` Tax Map No. 74.00-01-8.4 c 2 • • PETITIONER: Worley Private Stable CASE NUMBER: 18-6/2001 '; ~~ Planning Commission Hearing Date: June 5, 2001 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: June 26, 2001 A. REQUEST The petition of James and Sandra Worley to obtain a Special Use Permit for a private horse stable on 3.617 acres located at 4390 Harborwood Road, Catawba Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS No citizens spoke. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION Mr. David Holladay presented the staff report. The petitioner was unable to attend due to an emergency. The intent of the petitioner is to eventually create pasture over most of the property. A buffer of trees and natural vegetation would be left along the property lines. The perimeter fencing will be placed between the tree buffer and the pasture. D. CONDITIONS 1) There will be a maximum of three (3) horses on the property. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Ms. Martha Hooker moved to make a favorable recommendation for the request, with the one condition. Motion carried 5-0. F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report _ Other JarSet Sche d~S rY Roanoke County Planning Commission STAFF REPORT "~ PETITIONER: James & Sandra Worley PREPARED BY: David Holladay CA5E NUMBER: 18-06-2001 DATE: 6/5/01 PART I A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY James and Sandra Worley are requesting a Special Use Permit for a Private Stable on a 3.6-acre tract. A maximum of three horses would be permitted. The proposed use conforms with the policies and guidelines of the 1998 Roanoke County Community Plan. No negative impacts are anticipated. B. DESCRIPTION James and Sandra Worley are requesting a Special Use Permit for a Private Stable on a 3.6-acre tract. The property is zoned R-1, Residential, and is located at 4390 Harborwood Road, in the Catawba Magisterial District. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Private Stables are allowed by Special Use Permit in the R-1 zoning district. Use and Design Standards for Private Stables allow a maximum of one stable animal per acre, for lots less than five acres. The petitioners' 3.6-acre tract would be limited to a maximum of three horses. Erosion and sediment control measures maybe necessary, depending upon the extent of land disturbance for the creation of pasture areas. PART II A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Topography/Ve etg_ ation -The lot slopes up and to the south from Harborwood Road. The northern portion of the property is wooded. The central portion of the property is an open grass yard surrounding a home built in 1992. The house is located 550 feet from the front property line. Most of the lot to the rear of the house is wooded. A small dirt road continues from the end of the driveway, along the eastern property line, to the rear of the lot. R~3 Surrounding Neighborhood -All adjoining properties are zoned R-1, Residential. Land use in the vicinity includes a mix of agricultural uses and single family homes on larger parcels. The petitioners' 3.6-acre tract is typical of the size of surrounding lots. A small stable is located on adjoining property to the east. B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site La~ut -The existing front yard would be fenced and used as pasture. The Worleys plan to construct a 24' X 18' barn on the southern portion of the property. Much of the wooded area in the northern and southern portions of the lot would eventually be converted to fenced pasture. The petitioners plan to maintain some trees and vegetation along the property lines to serve as a buffer area. Fire & Rescue/LTtilities -The proposed use would not affect fire and rescue service. Public water and sanitary sewer are not available to the site. G CONFORMANCE WITH ROANOKE COUNTY COMMUNITY PLAN The property is designated Rural Village in the 1998 Roanoke County Community Plan. The Rural Villages are rural community and farming areas, where suburban or urban development patterns are discouraged. Agricultural uses, such as private stables are encouraged land uses. D. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The property meets the minimum lot area requirements for private stables. Ample acreage exists for perimeter fencing, and construction of accessory structures. PART III A. STAFF CONCLUSIONS The property is designated Rural Village in the 1998 Roanoke County Community Plan. The proposed use conforms with the policies and guidelines of the Community Plan. Private Stables on less than 5-acre tracts are limited to no more than one stable animal per acre. A maximum of three horses would be permitted. The proposed use is consistent with other rural and agricultural uses in the surrounding area. No negative impacts are anticipated. 2 County of Roanoke _ Community De~aelopment Planning & Zoning 5204 Bernard Drive P O Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 772-2108 ~,... c~.,ff rT~A n„l., Date received: Received by: ~~ Applicanuu fee: PC ZA date: yo.oo ~ISIo~ Placards issued: BOS date: Es ~v ~~-~ (~ z~ a1 Case number ~ g- ~ ~ Z60 1 R- 3 .=lLL APPLIC:=!<NT.S ~ Check type of application file (check all that apply) ~ Rezoning Special Use ~ Variance A licants nameladdress wlzi PP ~ ~ c~-~-~-~ rr~~ ff'' ~t'~,v~~v,~~v~ Phone• `~'~~~~~~'"~ + ~~~ ~ ~' ~~ ~ ; ~ ~ ; ~ •_ ~,., ,c ~ I ~ ~~ .~L:..t'~'\e'S c`f- ~c:~n ~L ~' /~~~, ,. ~, W , , ~ - /(,,I•Lt~.t.WJ~. CoY.~C~c ~ ~ ~ _ .l ~ ~-jai ( 7 7 ~ Len +~ c~r'c !~ r-. ~ • . Fax No. A ~ y v i ~l t~;~~,L ke Owners name/address wizip Phone: J ,~ ~ ' S ~ , f t~=1,'~ha~ l ~ ti lcu- ~1~~~, Wit, I tr~~t/ ~ ` '-I 3 ~ r° ~ p r- u; '! L' f-- ~ C ~~ d ~C1: Fa;c No . i i t , ~2 t 1~.1V\ 1~ ~ 7 ~ ~ <~ 3 Property Location Magisterial District: 1,~t1:.~~i,L,) ~7LL, ~ :~ c~ is 1~~~ r ~~6 a- rx: n r ~ ° ~ ~- ~ ~`, rr. ~-~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `~ ~j t ~ ~ ; >J~t. Community Planning area: Tax Map No.: ' ~ , __ ~ Existing Zoning: 1~ - ~/ Size of parcel(s): Acres: ~- l.z-~ ~ ~`~(' . Existing Land Use: ~~~; ~~ ;~3 ~;~ Proposed Zoning: ~~_1•. ~,~-L,~~ ~~;_ ~~"~ ~/.~t~, ~tc~hjC~ Proposed Land Use: )C.C.S i C't•1 , iC~ U.% ~~~"~`~ °%~ %'rt ~~ a~~` ~~ ~ ~- Does the parcel meet the minunum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes 4''~ No O IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. -/ Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Tyge? Yes k~ No ~ IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIILED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes ~ No O - ~ V.~iRI~l VCE riPPLIC_~NTS (V)" Variance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE l~IISSING OR INCOMPLETE. v V Consultation 8 1/2" x 11" concept plan Application Metes and bounds description Justif7cation Water and sewer application I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the property^or the owner's agent o~ consent of the owner. ~ ~~, ~ ~ 1 Application fee Proffers, if applicable Adjoining property owners ,r~~d am acting with the knowledge and s Signature 3L'aTIFIC~TI0N FOR: REZt~~'INC OR SPECI.I_; LiSF P~R'~II'f R:~t~i~ST Applicant ~..~ ~~~ ~" The Planning Commission will study rezoning and special use permi~ requests to dete.~nine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3} as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. z ~~ ~~ ~~ < (1~'f~~i~S 1rVC-~U~~~ ~~ nitX ~E. C'_~l~~~t~~~ ~~u(~('our'~~~ rya, ~"~' i i ~ -~ ~~ ~ !~ ~ }~' c~ ~ z S ~ cam. ~,~ S ~7 ~ 5 .~ ~ C C ~ ~ ~ lS ~- J1~'l~'.l~ _f ~fl'11 1L~ (~UvL ~ 1i i1U ~ ~~t ~ ~ j J t~ _f~_ ~_~ -~ ~ ~dJiC~i~1 t7 Y1S~ ~~' '~' G (: i.:.~ ~ ~ Ut.i ~ ~"~~ ~_~. ~ ('\ ~\~!~ l ~ ~1 E- (~ It f ~' ~ r"t iv1Q~ U t- 1 '. r ~ f"r"I ~ i v^.; -f-~~~c~+ ~ ~t i s~_ Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. r _ ~z.~ ~ ~,~~c~4 ~~~E ~J~~m~ ~ Cc,n7"Ur"rns wr~~ ~EC', ~~L'` ~l~-~. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recrea~t(ion and fire and rescue. ~ r. t7~ Qd`til~llfl fi Li JL' L~ai(1~~~' E3.re ~: l I l~~ r~o c~~v~xs~ im~~~~ .>1 ~ f V~ e]e~-a-~ ~,~ ~;7~ ~~~e C.o+l~r- w ~ ~ ~.1 co~c~:~~ ~L~~ ~x~c~,~s~ A concept plan of the proposed projeci must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the Iand use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County permitting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations . A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request. The Count<j Planning Division staff may exempt some of the items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the following are considered minimum: ~' 3 ALL APPLICANTS a. Applicant name and name of development b. Date, scale and north arrow c. Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions _ d. Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties e. Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. f. The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties g. All property lines and easements h. All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights _ i. Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development _ j. Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces Additional information required for REZONING AND SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANTS k. Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site _ 1. Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers - m. Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals _ n. Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections _ o. Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants _ p. Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed _ q. if project is to be phased, please show phase schedule I certify that all items required in the checklist above are complete. /~ ~ ~ l `~l /~ b i Date ~y ~ We propose to house a maximum of three horses. The area for containment of the horses will be fenced on all sides. We will maintain the tree-cover and foliage along the property lines to minimize changes to the neighborhood. The barn will comply with the County of Roanoke's minimum setback requirements. There will be sufficient ground cover to minimize stormwater runoff and erosion, and will not be denuded. 9~as3FaE(Yq.SEC.RlE.G39~ 26.80' .P/w vAQ/ES Gr~~ SG~'0/~3E PIN 7JC1o ! ~O PIN ~ '~ TD a /S '/ L!E .' 9 f -'~ SV,I.SECXTE.G~f, ;r- } ~'L e' 90~MB.L.~ i~ a ` i~ ~ 4 ~ ~, ~ b j ~ oG,O t ~ ..SPiv ~ '~ J, H \ ~ a F 4 ~1 `',`~ o~ p` f/oafE OET.~I/G N ~ ~•~ \ s J tvi `•' ~ ; ~ PL7oPERTY Of N O F' • J ~• ~ M.I/?R' W/MME~4 a ~ , o o TxN=74:00-a/-Od ~ m ~ ~ c G. oi~C a o ~ '` m w h a~ z ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ° ° ~ '~~ v a H LoT Z Z ~,\~ z a ~.7J7.iC. ~ ~ ~~~ PocE ~`~ ~o am o O ~ ~ ` i ~. a ~' z ~+ s 98~''9q.1 °, aH ~° ro ~ E ~ ~ ~ 5'E E ~ ~ G ° v °~. 0 0 ~~ALTX~r,~_ pE °°- ~ ~ 'L c- ~ ~ ~o'~ APAic s ~»z j~~; Z .Co T / ~ m\ a fi~rr.....? +B. a[ ~ N ° ~ RAYdI0N0 C. WEEDS ~ lr7,~c. "' ~ Cert. No. m H ~ ~' 8028 ,4 ~~9~. 4' V ,~ ?9S zp a ~ ""'NGO •oi •~G _ w ~ N THE SUBJECT_ PROPERTY IS WITHIN > F+ THE LIMITS OF ZONE "C'" AS ~ N SHOWN ON THE FEMA FLOOD LoT 2 '~ f ~Q. 1, N y INSURANCE RATE MAP. THIS ,app' .1~~ ~ t-I ~~~1`,Oa ~ a DETERMINATION IS BASED ON SAID ~~\ ~ ~~7' ~4 .t~ 0 4 y MAP AND HAS NOT BEEN VERIFIED _1~n~ `A•h ; p~ ~~4 ,~ ~0~ BY ACTUAL FIELD ELEVATIONS- I' y ,p ~~va ~4~ U~ N TZ 38'09 E ~ 9 -{T' ?74g' N/7 7/ S/ µi _ 70.00' 9 71 38 ~ 09 ..w ~ LoT9 30. oo' / ~ ~ `-- 30'PE,yPET!/.IL R/W FlSE FOUNDATION ~ ~~GO~ PG ~ 2ESS 'SURVEY FOR MICHAEL E. SOLESBEE & MARY ANN S~LESBEE OF LOT 1, C. DAN COLEMAN SUBDIVISION,SITUATE ON VA. SEC. RTE. 838 CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT P.B. 10, PG. 108 7aoo-oi• aa.a ROANOKE COUNTY, VA. TAX NO SCALE: 1~= /OO~ N.B G'~SDRAWN J° T. P. PARKER de SON ENOIN &~ ele Houl~ard DATE: ,~P'Q/[ d 199? CALC.~'`t~O CHK'D.ec.:,! SURVEYORS Post ~~ B~ as p_ taoo/ ' CLOSED' L'P~ PLANNERS 9d~ VSr~afa 2169 W.O.: 'j- 0574 ' J 3B~~''" '~ O Zsrr. vn%rc •o Q SiDEO Dwr& y ~ ~ LNOER. LLiyJT ~~ 9d a' W,. .r~ (~_3 6 ` i] \\\ 41.. r ~\ 7 5.17AC N e ~ 41.12 cn 41, 2 ~ 5.10 Ac 41.6 ~,1 13.82 Ac '' ~ n 19.95 Ae I r' IB 3.74Ad0 41'3 41.4 ~ I s< zoonc Harborwr 2.73ACIC)\ I 4.33Ac 41.5 41.8 4, z \ a.lsae e.7oA 41.10 I7 Llon Bend Unrbd 41.7 ~. 41.1 I CAwC 22.60 Ae 3.OOAe 33 ,may s.oox ~ s~z9 ~ 7 sp 6.oonc(DJ 6 I 20 Z,06 ~~ 5.45 Ac(CI Sii 0 ~ 41.13 :' 11.61 Ae. aze , zinc 29 1.5 W' `Y I Cemetery-, ~ , 16 ozA 34. I ' e 4 J0' ~ 5.02 ne1D1 30 2.02 Ae 2.66 Ae Ac 74 ~ 5.79AC IC) i.y1K r ~5~ r nc 7 9 ~. ~_~_ 5" ~ y~3 8.4 3.SIac 28 28 x t nc gg 8.5 361 Ac 8.13 9 ~~-.. 0.21 Ac .02 Ac E 4' 4.09 '/3 2.50 1.60 AC (~ 12.3 '. ...~ ~1_ . \~.. , . ~? AC Ac \ 3.60 AC 5.03AC 13 ~,9HAc \ 14 t 2.SACm 8.1 ' 3.OIncIC z I \ LzoA~ 25 8.2 8.31 ~ 13.79 Ac 8.12 22.2 Ac \ 9.69 4t s \ 3 II ~~ 6.03 Ae O 21 22 D.75AC(DI ~~. 7164 AC 5.39 Ac D 46H Ac \ a (ct \ 12.2 Q" ~ ~ 2 ~ 59.69 4cID1 49.14 Ae 56.91 Ac lCi \I 24 ~~.... 12.1 a. 1.37 Ac , 19.97Ae 0 2.I 23 o /~ ~ ~ 12.a9AC 1 ~ \~ \ I •`\ 49.SOAC ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ . \ 27.79 Ac ~ 4 36.00 Ac SO) 46.41 AC IC) 1 °" 2 ~ 3 )-Here was on overlap o/surveys ~ which involves this porcel and the porcel !o the north of porcel 4. 1.50 Ae1Dl 1.22 Ae iCl O 5 62HOACI 6 Nature Conserver // 100.00 Ae (Ol I 130. a7 Ae IC1 'I //~~ . , y3 ~~ o ~~,~4, ~~~~ ras }T3 4c ~~ ~4 i~ ~~ e ~~fi~,~ 6< 3.5 I ~.k' II ~ ,~4~ ~ons~l"u ~}ow~ ~ ~Cn Ce ~ ~ Pc~s~r2 ~~~1 ~ L~ ~~' ~~. g s, c~~ Ac. 2 ii ~x c~ ~2-3 IJ •~ ~ ^ 4451 ~ ,, ni 5580 5.1 6 Ac . 4435 ~ 5.00 A c. _ ~~ _ oo ~ ~~S ~ ~ ~ 4375 m ° ~ 5600 0~ 7 Q 2S ~o ~ 6 628 ~ ~ ~. O ~-- ~ ~° ,tea°- ~ ~ ~ v 3 ~ v' 2 ~ Q ti ~ 9J 4452 ~~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ' d' 8 4444 `5 ~ ~ v- ~ `" ~ ° ~. ~ 4390 ~ `-566 ~ - ° 4378 9 ~. ~ ~~ ~ 4. 3.51 Ac . ~ 5640 _ 5656 ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~, ~- ~, ~. n 4410 3.61 H,c . ~0 2 A ` ~ . " 5672 ° 230(S) ~ ° ~.5 4.73 Ac. 9.69 Ac. e 2 RDANOKE COUNTY Applicants name: James & Sandra Worley DEPARTMENT OF Zoning: Special Use COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Proposed Zoning: R-1 ` Tax Map No. 74.00-01-8.4 J 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 26, 2001 ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO JAMES AND SANDRA WORLEY FOR A PRIVATE STABLE TO BE LOCATED AT 4390 HARBORWOOD ROAD (TAX MAP N0.74.00-1-8.4), CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, James and Sandra Worley have filed a petition for a special use permit for a private stable to be located at 4390 Harborwood Road (Tax Map No. 74.00-1-8.4) in the Catawba Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on June 5, 2001; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on May 22, 2001; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on June 26, 2001. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to James and Sandra Worley for a private stable to be located at 4390 Harborwood Road (Tax Map No. 74.00-1-8.4) in the Catawba Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 2000 Community Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.2-2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved with the following condition: (1) There will be a maximum of three (3) horses on the property. 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. U: \WPDOCS\AGENDA\ZONING\worley.stable.sup.wpd AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 26, 2001 ORDINANCE 062601-12 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO FAITH CHRISTIAN SCHOOL, INC. TO CONSTRUCT A NEW SCHOOL TO BE LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BUCK MOUNTAIN ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 88.03-3-11), CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Faith Christian School, Inc. has filed a petition for a special use permit to construct a new school to be located on the north side of Buck Mountain Road (Tax Map No. 88.03-3-11) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on June 5, 2001; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on May 22, 2001; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on June 26, 2001. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Faith Christian School, Inc. to construct a new school to be located on the north side of Buck Mountain Road (Tax Map No. 88.03-3-11) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 2000 Community Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.2-2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved with the following conditions: (1) The plan will be developed in general conformity with the Community Plan and Clearbrook Overlay District. (2) If the applicant installs exterior lighting, including lighting for athletic fields, then the applicant shall submit such lighting plan to County staff for review and approval. Any disagreement shall be submitted to the 1 Board of Supervisors. (3) Applicant shall install school zone warning signs and a deceleration lane as required by VDOT standards. 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance with three conditions added, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Hol on, CMC Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Terry Harrington, County Planner William E. Driver, Director, Real Estate Valuation Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 2 ,! ` 1 ~,._ v K-~ . ~ -~ ,. ~'°R°~ Hlu. Rldg. P.rkwq It. ,S~w. ~~.r q° z7. a° az. .. ~ l. ~ ~ N , . w~o 4Z. f.~ J°O' t8 ~ ° z a. ~ ' Y s' ie 1 .,. s°. A ,a ~ iv. . ee tai s. is "" .~ .« ~ 2 4 ~ ~' b~ v.... r 11. ~ ?a. v 18. ,+~ v • im w. ~ OY.ir _ ~°. ~. ,~:..a ~ ~.,. ,~$ w ~. e. aO ~ ~ ,.. 8 ~ S°. ~m ~. Lei w -4. D. r e. ,e ° t .. ° .zie k ,~... i'r w 4 ROANOKE COUNTY Applicants name: Faith Christian School Incorporated DEPARTMENT OF Zoning: A.R. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Proposed Zoning: Special Use Tax Map No. 88.03-3-11 PETITIONER: Faith Christian School, Inc. ~~ CASE NUMBER: 19-6/2001 '~ Planning Commission Hearing Date: June 5, 2001 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: June 26, 2001 A. REQUEST The petition of Faith Christian School to obtain a Special Use Permit to construct a new school, on 21.12 acres located on the north side of Buck Mountain Road (Rt. 679), Cave Spring Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS Several students from the school spoke in support of the Special Use Permit. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION Ms. Janet Scheid presented the staff report. The Planning Commission expressed some concern regarding potential lights on the proposed athletic field. D. CONDITIONS • Site lighting shall not exceed the elevation of the Blue Ridge Parkway as measured horizontally from a line perpendicular from the Blue Ridge Parkway centerline. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Don Witt made a motion to approve the request with the condition. Motion carried 5-0. F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report _ Other Ja et- Sc~ieid, Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commission s R 'I STAFF REPORT PART I PETITION: Faith Christian School FILE NO.: 19-6/2001 PREPARED BY: T. Harrington DATE PREPARED: May 21, 2001 A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This is a request to construct a private K-12 school on a 21 acre site on Buck Mountain Road. Sixty-thousand (60,000) square feet of academic, administrative, and recreational space are proposed. The property is designated rural preserve in the community plan and lies adjacent to the Blue Ridge Parkway. B. DESCRIPTION This is a request of Faith Christian School for a special use to permit to construct and operate a private school on a 21 + acre parcel located in the 3700 block of Buck Mountain Road, just east of the Blue Ridge Parkway overpass. The property is zoned AR. Private and public schools are allowed by SUP in AR districts. The property is located in the Cave Spring Magisterial District. Faith Christian school currently is located in the City of Roanoke . The school is an independent, non-affiliated facility that provides a classical Christian education to grades 6-12 at this time. They are in need of larger facilities to serve their current students and in order to expand their program to the K-5 grades. The school proposes to develop a campus type of environment, including classroom, administrative and recreational facilities. C. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Elementary and Secondary Schools are allowed by SUP in AR zoning districts. The property is partially within, the "Secondary Area" as defined by the Clearbrook Village Master Plan. All of the proposed buildings and parking facilities are located outside the secondary area. Thus, Clearbrook design guidelines are not generally applicable to this property, unless recommended and accepted by the Board of Supervisors as conditions on the SUP. An approved erosion and sediment control plan and a site development plan will be required, prior to commencement of grading or construction R`I A commercial entrance permit will be required by VDOT. VDOT shall determine what types of improvements will be required along Buck Mountain Road as a condition of the entrance permit. PART II A. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS The property is a 21 acre site that generally lies above Buck Mountain Road and below the Blue Ridge Parkway. The property is densely wooded, with significant underbrush currently making access to the property difficult. There are no visible roads or points of defined access to the property. The topography varies, with elevations on the site ranging from 1200 feet to approximately 1350 feet. The adjacent parkway property has elevations ranging from 1300 to 1356 feet. With the exception of the parkway, the surrounding neighborhood along and near Buck Mountain Road is characterized by single family homes and several churches. B. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Building Program The school proposes to construct a private K-12 school campus. At least two phases are envisioned. Phase 1 would involve the construction of a core service building, recreational field, and classroom space to accommodate grades 6-12. Phase 2 involves the construction of instructional space for grades K-5. At final build out, approximately 60,000 square feet of space is envisioned. 2. Grading and Visibility No grading plans have been submitted with the SUP request. As such, it is not possible to fully evaluate the impact of the construction on the view sheds of the parkway. Blue Ridge Parkway staff have been notified of this request, and may offer comments prior to your public hearing. The parkway right-of- way provides approximately 400 feet of buffer between the proposed buildings and the actual parkway road bed. This distance, coupled with the changes in topography and vegetative cover may serve to adequately buffer the development from the parkway. Factors such as building height, winter loss of vegetative cover, on-site tree removal and site lighting could all negatively affect parkway visibility. Staff believes that due to the topography of the site, and the large scale of the facilities proposed, significant tree cover will be necessarily lost on those core portions of the site devoted to buildings, parking and active recreation areas. RY 3. Access A single access point to Buck Mountain Road is proposed. VDOT has commented that a traffic impact study will likely be required as a component of an application for a commercial entrance permit for this project. VDOT believes that sufficient site distance does exist at the chosen entrance location. VDOT has also commented that if a new commercial entrance is permitted, a right turn and a left turn lane may have to be constructed to the site. The length of the full width turn lanes and the tapers will be determined once additional information is received about the entrance and the estimated trips generated by the site. Additional right of way may be needed for construction of these turn lanes. 4. Architecture No information has been provided on the proposed architectural style of the buildings, or materials to be used. The application states that no building will exceed 45 feet in height (four stories). 5. Traffic Generation Morning and afternoon peak hours of traffic are expected. The estimated traffic count on Buck Mountain Road is 4,650 vehicle trips per day. The school at buildout will have a rated capacity of 520 students. The school administration expects that within 10 years they will have reached a 80-85% occupancy rate or approximately 420-430 students in grades K-12. Based on current ratios, the school administration predicts that those 430 students will come from approximately 300 families. Transportation to and from school is exclusively by private vehicle now and in the foreseeable future. Therefore, the proposed school will add an estimated 1,200 vehicle trips per day to the road. At some point in the future the feasibility of using school buses may be explored. 6. Amenities A recreational field for baseball and soccer is proposed at the eastern end of the property. Significant grading and loss of tree cover will be required for the construction of this field. In addition, the school does plan to light this playing field . This may result in light impacts for surrounding properties and the parkway. 7. Utilities Public water is available at the site. Sewer service is not currently available. The applicant has proposed the possible construction of a sanitary sewer force main that would connect the site to exiting sewer facilities along Route 220. If this type of pump system is not approved, then gravity sewer, would need to be provided, or adequate septic facilities would need to be constructed on site . 8. Fire/Rescue The Fire and Rescue Department has advised that the construction of this facility will not change or impact the provision of services in this area. Petition: 3 File No.: R-~~ 9. Community Meeting A community meeting was held on the evening of May 29, 2001. Approximately 20 residents from the Clearbrook area attended. Questions concerning traffic generation, fencing of the school property, stormwater management, number of students and lighting of the property and athletic field were addressed to the applicant. C. CONFORMANCE WITH COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The property is designated Rural Preserve in the 1998 Community Plan. Although rural preserve areas are generally located in outlying areas of the county, this site was designated rural preserve due, in part, to its close proximity to the parkway. Development in rural preserve areas is generally discouraged with the exception of very low density residential development and rural institutional uses such as schools and churches serving the needs of rural residents. PART I I I STAFF CONCLUSIONS Staff believes that the proposed school campus is an acceptable and desirable use for this site. However, we believe that certain issues pertaining to site development and building design should be discerned by the Commission prior to making a recommendation on this request. Specifically these issues are: Elevation of the buildings (in relation to the parkway) should be determined so that possible view shed impacts on the property can be understood. 2. Information on building architecture/style will help assess compatibility of the construction with the Clearbrook Village Design Guidelines. 3. Information on proposed site lighting, particularly for the athletic field, will help to assess the impacts of lighting on the community and the parkway. Petition: 4 File No.: ,~- County'of Roanoke Community Development Planning & Zoning 5204 Bernard Drive For Staff Ilse only "` ~~ ~ i P O Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 772-2108 Date received: Received by: ~~ i ~_ Application fee: pC/B7~y ~; ,~ ~ ~ , e;a is v 5 2 CV j Placards issued: BOS date: es yII~1~i .June zta, 2~~~ Case Number ~ 9 - (p' ZOO ~ Check type of application filed (check all that apply) ~ Rezoning Special Use . O Vag fiance Applicants name/address w/zip Phone• 540-343-2484 Faith Christian School Incorporated 2014 Memorial Ave. Fax No540-343-1615 Owners name/address w/zip Phone: 540-343-5100 Blanche B. Balzer, Grace Chandler Curd, et al c/o James B. Massey III Fax No.540-343-5507 O1 S. Jefferson St. Roanoke, VA 24011 Property Location North side of •Buck Mountain Road (RT Magisteri 1 District: ave S rin 679) West of US 220 East of Blue Ridge Community Planning area: Clearbrook Tax Map No.: gg,03-03-11 M Existing "Zoning: AR Size of pazcel(s): Acres: 21 • 12 Existing Land Use: Forest Lands -Z:E~OI\~.ZAtG.AI~..t~ SP~~I~LTIS~ P.£~'IT.elPF7;~~A11~TS (R/S) Proposed Zoning: Special Use Permit Proposed Land Use: Construction of New School Does the parcel meet the minimum lot azea, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes ~ No l7 IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIItEli FIRST. Does the pazcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes ~ No O iF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIItED FIRST If rezoning request, aze conditions being proffered with this requesi? Yes D No 0 ~'RIAIVG~,' AP P LICA ~ S r ~ S t'~'1 X ' ~ ~ ' ~" ~ ~~r • 5 ' . , . ~ . , r : t . Y 9: .' 'i . ,. ~ R, J; r Variance•of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WII.L NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. Consultation /~ 8 1/2" x 11" concept Flan Application fee Application Metes and bounds description ~'/~• Proffers, if applicable Justification Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the property or the owner s agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the ]mowledge•and consent of the owner. Faith Christian Sc , Incorporated b ~ • Owner s Signature . Cha rm of the Board z-~ JUSTIFICATION Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance (Section 30-3) as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning ordinance. The proposed use of this property will meet and further the purposes of Section 30-3 in the following manner: 1) Adequate external light will be provided by removing an appropriate amount of tree cover to utilize natural light to the extent possible in the improved portions of the tract supplemented with outside artificial lighting in all parking areas or areas of outside use. Access will be by way of a single gated driveway bringing traffic off of Buck Mountain Road using turning circles to isolate bus and automobile traffic at drop-off and pickup points and having distinct routing for service and delivery vehicles. It is expected that occupied buildings will have fire suppression sprinkler systems and will meet all other requirements of the local fire codes related to this use. The property is not in a flood zone and will use culverts and proper drainage handling features to mitigate and eliminate any potential threats from flood. 2) The use of a single driveway to handle access and egress from Buck Mountain Road to the property for primary traffic coupled with VDOT required lanes for deceleration and turning will prevent congestion in the public streets. Also, the hours of operation of this facility as a school will concentrate traffic to two times during the day. 3) Construction of a school on the property will allow the majority of the site to remain substantially virgin. An estimated 12 acres will be disturbed out of the tota121 acres at what we perceive to be full utilization. Maintaining much of the natural vegetation supplemented with landscaped areas and screens, the site will not have a heavy developed look but rather retain much of the rural character that it now has. 4) As a private school, the proposed project will create a new outlet of education For not only Roanoke County residents but also residents of neighboring locales. Construction of a gymnasium and sports fields will provide on-site recreation minimizing the need to use County facilities and expanding the optional sites for area sporting events. Using the existing forested land for cross country and nature trails will keep users in a protected environment out of the reach of vehicular traffic. The likely construction of an on-site pump station to access county sewer may create opportunity for neighboring residents to connect to county facilities. R-4 5) There are no historic buildings or areas directly affected by this project. The Blue Ridge Parkway forms a substantial part of the boundary and will have its view into this tract shielded by vegetation and topographically influenced lines of site. 6) As stated previously, the project is expected to disturb only 12 of 21 acres at full utilization with about 2 acres of building coverage. Adequate water and sewer capacity exists to serve the project subject to applicant's construction of proper infrastructure to gain access. While sewer is more than 500 feet away, applicant is applying for service from Roanoke County rather than constructing a septic system. 7) The ultimate placement of some 500 students and faculty in close proximity to the retail development under the Clearbrook Community Plan will likely help stimulate development of retail merchants and service providers in that area as well as the Starkey Road corridor. In addition, certain commercial vendors may serve the facility as contract employees such as cafeteria services and janitorial services. 8) As stated previously, the project would expect to disturb only 12 of 21 acres and would seek to retain the maximum amount of desirable vegetation. 9) This property does not affect nor is it affected by air traffic. 10) Seasonal streams that typically carry water only during times of rainwater runoff traverse the property. Those streams and watercourses will be managed by use of culverts where needed to direct the flow into approved stormwater drainage systems and ditches. Additional runoff caused by grading and paving will be handled by detention and retention ponds as required by code directed into the same stormwater drainage systems. The site is to be served by Roanoke County water and sewer so that there will be no direct extraction from or discharge into the site. 11) The project will neither create nor replace any residential housing. The property is currently zoned AR Agricultural/Residential District. Under Section 30-34-2 PERMITTED USES, and Section 30-19 SPECIAL USE PERMITS, the property may be used for Educational Facilities, Primary/Secondary as a Civic Use. Site development regulations under Section 30-34-3 relating to setbacks and restrictions on lot coverage and height will be met within the scope of the project. 1?-y Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. Under the 199$ Roanoke County Community Plan, the property is designated as RURAL PRESERVE. The stated objective of this designation is to: A} While allowing future development, employ design strategies that leave land available for productive agricultural activities and open space. B) Preserve rural views and vistas. This project meets the objectives and will follow the guidelines by leaving more than 50% of the parcel as open and forested space, using the natural tree cover and new buffers to screen buildings from being prominently seen. The use of a single driveway for this sole occupant of the site eliminates the potential of multiple driveways under a residential or multi-tenant application. The buildings will be located on the site to take advantage of topo and tree cover to substantially screen the buildings from view. This is especially true of the views from the Blue Ridge Parkway where the applicant has established a conceptual site plan that maximizes the distance of any improvements from the Parkway and takes full advantage of angles of view as seen from the Parkway. Engineers have measured vectors from the Parkway to the proposed building pad and determined that the buildings will be adequately screened. While exact architectural design features are not yet known, the likely use of a combination of materials would seek to place brick, veneer, or painted facades in the areas of any public view while using metal skins or other less compatible materials in areas that would not be visible from the adjoining properties. Portions of the buildings may be bermed to take advantage of the site topography and minimize grading. The topography of the site combined with the consideration to minimize visibility from neighboring sites centralizes the placement of the buildings and avoids the need to construct improvements on any ridge line. In addition, the property rises from Buck Mountain Road toward the Parkway. The tree cover in the Parkway buffer zone as well as the tree cover to be retained on the perimeter of the site will leave the view behind the buildings unaltered as seen from the south side of Buck Mountain Road. The property lies within the Clearbrook Community Planning Area and is designated in part as a Secondary Area under the Clearbook Village Overlay District Maps. As such, it is not directly affected by the proposed rezoning of property for commercial use. However, under the Master Plan, it is consistent with the proposed land use outside the "Village" comparable to an Assisted Living Facility, which tends to have ample open and green space. ~~ Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impact(s) on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. Currently, the property is in dormant forest use. No active cultivation of trees for harvest is occurring nor is there any organized recreational use of the property. Based on permitted uses, the trees could be harvested leaving the site barren and subject to problems with erosion. The property could also be developed for residential use, which would also result in greater disturbance of vegetation, greater difficulty in screening the houses from view, multiple driveways, and likely establishment of multiple drainfields for septic systems. The proposed use eliminates many of these issues. Development of a school would impact the property relative to its current state but would be favorable in that it would cluster the development, eliminate multiple driveways, reduce the need for multi-story construction, access county water and sewer instead of placing demands on the site for septic, create new recreational facilities, and create employment opportunities with contract services and stimulation of retail growth in the 220 and Starkey corridors. As a school, it will not require any special services of the County. "' ~-`~ A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall~graphically depict the land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the.plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County permitting regulations. . The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions aze proffered and accepted in a rezonirg or imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request. The County Planning Division staff may exempt some of the items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the following are considered minimum: ALL APPLICANTS / a. Applicant name and name of development ~prt';~- C~-R1sY~,4--~ ~c'x-, ~~'• ~~' ~~~~ ~~~ / b. Date, scale and north arrow / c. Lot size in acres a~-~~are~eeE and dimensions ss~ ~cIN~S.ii ~~~~~. s2~ "fig-tGl~tj~~oD / d. Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties ~MLt,v~, (.,lsi '' ~/ e. Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. - ~, , / f. The zoning and land use of alI adjacent properties £+-Y'i1tZ~ ~4-(t~A- Q~ ~ g. All property line~~and easements ~_ ~~,p;~ g~~k,2oa~ /~ h. All buildings, ex~ g and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights ~ i. Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development j. Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and load~spa,1ce~~ b~eY,~. Additional information required for REZONING AND SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANTS ~ k. Existing utilities (water, sewer, sto drains) and connections at the site / 1. Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers / m. Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals / n. Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections Sd~ ~'~'~ ~~ "f' ~0 ~n''"'`>> T ~~ ~ ~~ w~ o. ~ Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants . p. Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed / q. if project is to be phased, please show phase schedule I certify that all it ms required in the checklist above are complete. ~~ p~ . - / -o Signature of applicant Date ~1Z. ~tTFE- ~ S T7PHv ~O (.~ _ _ r ~ ~' I ~~ ;- ~ ~ ~ ~ I / ~ /~ \ \ I / ~~ ~ ~` 1111 ~ i ~ \ ; t f I /f / i ~ \\ \ \\ \ \\ \ ^ ~J h ~ \ ~``~ O ;_ ~ is f/ 1 N ~ \~ ~~ ~„ it ~\ I~ ~ ~ f f I I I ~ ~~ ` I / ~ ~-c°r° c fl.~ t ~ s. I ` ` \ ~...__/ ~ ~~ 167 ` ~. ] O Y N ~ N i .~ t l ~ `~' I / / / 1 a~~~ .. 1 - / ~~ J ~ I I I ~ / J ~ i ~ ~~ I I~t ~ i `_,' ~~ / / I I / is / 1 ~ \1 ~, ~ ~ l / ! / / /J ~~ / 1 245 ~ t~ ,i L ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ / / / ~ t.{~~~ Cat I \ V Cn .~ >, / / ~ / ~ / i ¢ 1 .~. / ~ i 323 } 'm m o ~ ~ -o I ~ _ ~ M a a~ ~ •- / ~ °. d~ L >_ ~ ~/ t ~ E ~~•.~ ~ ~ l \ r~M 2 L s ~~NN~~VW 1 ~ 1 \ ~ ` I ~ ~ .r ~ cif ~ ~ d" 2 c :~ -m u, °' ~ 1 ~~~o~>T ~ f I 1 I J~ 1/ ~ ~ 's ~ ~.S~a~co'w I I I~ I 1 ~` I ~__1 I i i ~~ ~ l~ ~, ~:~ ~ ~~ ~~ \ ~~ ~ 1 / ~ ~ 1 1 ~ f ~ ~ ~~ I I I ~~~ ~ \ \~ ~ ~ a t ,~ ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ a. ~ SCALE: 1 ~~=20~~ COMM. N0. TITLE: DRAWN BY: Faith Christian School GAs ~, DATE: Concept Plan CHECKED 8Y: SPECTRUM DESIGN 04/20/01 GAS DRAWING NO. ~^~ •.! ~~~~~ 3e. v ~-~ ® 82v,1-" T ~_ . ~. O ~« 3 i ~ 1 ~ w. ~~ a1w Wdy. P.rbe9 w k(d ~ 2. ~. a 9 + 33. iAow uiw -_ to. ~:1 ~t. ,.a,~. ..y .. n... e. s, o. at. ew e. _ _ s7, ze a az. ~• •• y~. ' 2m zo ' a w~~ ~ u ~ ag. calk ~°. ~ ~ "` ~, E iv k. Z.e ,. yea u.l s. ,. _ a. ~.. ~ 2 1 v X8.2 ~ 6 ' I~ir M L 6. 32. ~ B. ~p~ ~ 3L. ~e.~ wltl ~ Aa ,s vh w ~1. ,1~~ w. 12. M q. / ' e 13. \\ im w. _ ,~~o `/ ROANOKE COUNTY Applicants name: Faith Chr~,stian School Incorporated DEPARTMENT OF Zoning: A.R. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Proposed Zoning: Special Use ` Tax Map No. 88.03-3-11 J R-'( AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 26, 2001 ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO FAITH CHRISTIAN SCHOOL, IIVC. TO CONSTRUCT A NEW SCHOOL TO BE LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BUCK MOUNTAIN ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 88.03-3-11), CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Faith Christian School, Inc. has filed a petition for a special use permit to construct a new school to be located on the north side of Buck Mountain Road (Tax Map No. 88.03-3- 11) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on June 5, 2001; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on May 22, 2001; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on June 26, 2001. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Faith Christian School, Inc. to construct a new school to be located on the north side of Buck Mountain Road (Tax Map No. 88.03-3-11) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 2000 Community Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.2-2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved with the following condition: (1) Site lighting shall not exceed the elevation of the Blue Ridge Parkway as measured horizontally from a line perpendicular from the Blue Ridge Parkway centerline. 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. U:\WPDOCS\AGENDA\ZONING\faith.christian.school.sup.wpd 1 o~ A~""~~F AGENDA ITEM NO. /~~ ~ ," , Z o Z J ' ,a APPEARANCE REQUEST 1838 -- PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~~ ~ ~-~j C~ ~ ~~ %,~,~~-, 5 c ~ri~ / I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD- /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW-- ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ADDRESS: 6` 5 L~ PHONE: O~ p,OAND,Y~G ti;~ ~ z ',~ ~ Z V ~.a~ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~_y ,838 APPEARANCE REQUEST ~/ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: l I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW. ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ADDRESS: Gtr' /.i C ~~'u ~ ~ ~~5 ~ I~~'Y PHONE: ~tp Z~ G'y SGT' o~ aoaNO,~F AGENDA ITEM N - `~ L ~. Z o ,Z J a APPEARANCE REQUEST 1838 PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS ,-- SUBJECT: ~~r I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ADDRESS: S~! kc d~lo! ~ PHONE: ~ `~`7 - ~ ~ ~ '7 o~ ~,oa-vo~F AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ ~ ~ 9 z ~ ~o `. ? v ,... a ,83a APPEARANCE REQUEST ~~ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: sp~'c~~~gL i .~,-~~L~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW-- ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~~, M ,c~C~9c ~- 5~9 yiTZ ~i2. ADDRESS: ~~' ~ Gf!/~Fi~~~~ cz:z:A'zi ~ Rcx~C-Y ~~,~- y~9 2~/s / PHONE: (s-~~) ~.~3° 2~~~ O~ p0AN0,YF ' ~' AGENDA ITEM NO. L~ ~ ,,. ~ '{ r ,z v :. ' a X838 ~-APPEARANC REQUEST _~PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS ,~ SUBJECT: ~/~~ci/aL ~~ ('Ftzrvll T (F./alTt-~ ~ta~rs~~/ sc%rvvL~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/IVES L/STED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: J;~ yl ~ J/~ , 5.~1 i/1~7Z , SR , ADDRESS: ~~S L,~~r.~f>~~~ ~~;~r~ R~~; mv~~ /~I 2-~/s/ PHONE: - - _ _ (s~G~ ~/~'3- 2G~ ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 26, 2001 ORDINANCE 062601-13 REAPPORTIONING THE REPRESENTATION IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, BY ALTERING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE ELECTION DISTRICTS, BY ESTABLISHING VOTING PRECINCTS THEREFOR, INCORPORATING A MAP SHOWING THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID DISTRICTS AND PRECINCTS, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE WHEREAS, on February 27, 2001, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County held a public hearing to receive comments on developing guidelines for the redistricting of Roanoke County in accordance with the decennial census; and WHEREAS, on March 13, 2002, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County adopted Guidelines for the 2001 Redistricting of Roanoke County. WHEREAS, legal notice of a public hearing concerning the adoption of an ordinance establishing magisterial districts for the County of Roanoke was provided as required by law; and WHEREAS, the first reading on this ordinance was held June 12, 2001; and the second reading and public hearing was held on June 26, 2001; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of SUPERVISORS of Roanoke County, as follows: 1. That there shall be established in Roanoke County five magisterial or election districts to be known and designated as follows: Catawba Magisterial District Hollins Magisterial District Vinton Magisterial District Cave Spring Magisterial District Windsor Hills Magisterial District from each of which there shall be elected one member of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County; and 2. That the outside boundaries of the five magisterial districts shall be as follows: Catawba Maaisterial District Beginning at the common corner between Craig, Montgomery, and Roanoke counties; thence with the line between Craig and Roanoke counties along the crest of North and Brush Mountains in a northeastern direction to the common corner in the line between Roanoke, Craig, and Botetourt counties; thence with the line between Roanoke and Botetourt counties in a southeasterly direction to the southerly right-of-way line of Interstate 81; thence with the southerly right-of-way of Interstate 81 and in a westerly direction to its intersection with Interstate 581; thence in a southerly direction with Interstate 581 to its intersection with Woodhaven Road Route 628 ;thence in a southeaster) direction with Woodhaven Road Route 628 to its intersection with Peters Creek Road (Route 117), said point being on the northerly boundary of the City of Roanoke and the northerly right- of-way of Peters Creek Road (Route 117); thence in the southwesterly direction of Peters Creek Road (Route 117) and with the City of Roanoke corporate lines to their intersection with Cove Road (Route 116); thence with Cove Road (Route 116) and with the City of Roanoke corporate line in a westerly and southwesterly direction to its intersection with the east corporate line of the City of Salem; thence with the east corporate line of the City of Salem in a northwesterly direction to Electric Road (Virginia Primary Route 419); thence with the east corporate line of the City of Salem and Electric Road (Virginia Primary Route 419) to Interstate 81 and the north corporate line of the City of Salem; thence with the north corporate line of the City of Salem and Interstate 81 in a southwesterly direction into the west corporate line of the City of Salem; thence with the corporate line of the City of Salem in a southerly direction to a point of intersection with Twelve O=Clock Knob Road (Route 694); thence in a southerly direction with Twelve O=Clock Knob Road (Route 694) to a point where it intersects with a gas transmission line at the crest of Twelve O=Clock Knob (elevation 2683); thence with the crest of Twelve O=Clock Knob and with the crest of Poor Mountain, the dividing line between the Catawba and the Windsor Hills Magisterial Districts, in a westerly and southwesterly direction to its intersection with Poor Mountain Road (State Secondary Route 612); thence following the ridge line of Poor Mountain in generally southwesterly direction to a point of intersection with Honeysuckle Road (State Secondary Route 916) at the Roanoke/Montgomery County line; thence with the Roanoke/Montgomery County line in a northerly direction to the place of beginning. Windsor Hills Magisterial District Beginning at a point on the east side of Electric Road (Virginia Primary Route 419) and the north side of Keagy Road (Virginia Secondary Highway 685) a common corner on the City of Salem/City of Roanoke/Roanoke County boundary; thence with the west corporate line of the City of Roanoke and the east side of Electric Road (Virginia Primary Route 419) in asouth-southeasterly direction to the intersection of Glen Heather Road (Virginia Highway 713); thence with the west corporate line of the City of Roanoke and the south side of Glen Heather Road (Virginia Highway 713) in an easterly direction to the intersection with Grandin Road Extension (State Secondary Route 686); thence with the west corporate line of the City of Roanoke and the south side of Grandin Road Extension (State Secondary Route 686) in an easterly direction to the west outside boundary of Taryn Hill Subdivision; thence with the west corporate line of the City of Roanoke to Garst Mill Road (Route 682); thence with the west corporate line of the City of Roanoke and the south side of Garst Mill Road (Route 682) in an east-northeasterly direction to the intersection of Grandin Road Extension (State Secondary Route 686); thence with the west corporate line of the City of Roanoke and the south side of Grandin Road Extension (State Secondary Route 686) in an easterly direction to the center of Mudlick Creek; thence with the west corporate line of the City of Roanoke to Brambleton Avenue (U. S. Highway 221); thence leaving the corporate line of the City of Roanoke and with Brambleton Avenue (U. S. Highway 221) in a southwesterly direction to Poage Valley Road Extension (State Secondary Route 690); thence southerly with Poage Valley Road Extension (State Secondary Route 690) to Dawnwood Road (State Secondary Route 691); thence with Dawnwood Road (State Secondary Route 691) in a southerly direction to the Roanoke/Franklin County line; thence with the Roanoke/Franklin County line as it meanders in a southwesterly direction along the crest of Blue Ridge Mountains to its intersection with the Roanoke/Floyd County line; thence with the Roanoke/Floyd County line westerly to its intersection with the common corner of the Roanoke/Montgomery/Floyd county line; thence with the Roanoke/Montgomery County line in a northerly direction to the crest of Poor Mountain at its intersection with Honeysuckle Road (State Secondary Route 916); thence along the crest of Poor Mountain in a generally northeasterly direction thence continuing along the crest of Poor Mountain and Twelve O'Clock Knob to a point where a gas transmission line crosses the crest of Twelve O'Clock Knob (elevation 2683) at Twelve O=Clock Knob Road; thence with Twelve O=Clock Knob Road in a northerly direction to its intersection with the corporate line of the City of Salem; thence with the corporate line of the City of Salem in an easterly and northerly direction to Keagy Road (Virginia Secondary Highway 685); thence in a northerly and easterly direction with Keagy Road (Virginia Secondary Highway 685) to its intersection with Electric Road (Virginia Primary Route 419) to place of beginning. Cave Spring Magisterial District Beginning at a point where Yellow Mountain Road (Virginia Secondary Route 668) crosses the Blue Ridge Parkway; thence in a southerly direction until Yellow Mountain Road (Virginia Secondary Route 668) intersects Mayland Road (Route 667); thence in a southeasterly direction with Mayland Road (Secondary Route 667) to its intersection with Bandy Road (State Route 666); thence in a souther) direction with Band Road Route 666_,),. to its intersection with Crowell Ga Road Route 657 ~ thence in an easterl direction, with ,Crowell. Gam ,Road ,to the, Roanoke/Franklin Coun~~_ line; wee-fn-a ;thence with the Roanoke/Franklin County line in a southwest to northwest direction as it meanders along the crest of the Blue Ridge Mountains to a point where Dawnwood Road (State Secondary Route 691) crosses said Roanoke/Franklin County line; thence in a northerly direction with the Dawnwood Road (State Secondary Route 691) to its point of intersection with Poage Valley Road Extension (State Secondary Route 690); thence with Poage Valley Road Extension (State Secondary Route 690) in a northerly direction to its intersection with Bent Mountain Road (U. S. Highway 221); thence in a northeasterly direction with Bent Mountain Road (U.S. Highway 221) to a point where said route enters the City of Roanoke; thence with the corporate line of the City of Roanoke in a southeasterly and easterly direction until it intersects with the western side of Yellow Mountain Road (Virginia Secondary Route 668) at the place of beginning. Hollins Magisterial District Beginning at a point of intersection of the southerly right-of-way of Interstate 81 and the Roanoke/Botetourt County line; thence with the southerly right-of-way of Interstate 81 in a westerly direction to its intersection with Interstate 581; thence in a southerly direction with Interstate 581 ,to Woodhaven Road Route 628 ~ thence in a souther) direction with Woodhaven Road Route 628 to its intersection with Peters Creek Road (Virginia Route 117) and the corporate line of the City of Roanoke; thence in an easterly and southerly direction with the corporate line of the City of Roanoke to a point of intersection ~e - - ,with Challen er Avenue,.(Route 460 ~ thence in a northeaster) direction with Chal__ ~, len~ger Avenue Route 460 to its intersection with the Roanoke/Botetourt Cou„ _ , n~_line1 thence in a northerly and westerly direction with the Roanoke/Botetourt County line to the place of beginning. Vinton Magisterial District 5 Beginning at a common point between Botetourt and Roanoke counties and Route 460 (Challen_ger,Drive~thence in a southwest„_, erly direction to th, .e,Cit~r of _ ~ - a# Roanoke corporate line; thence in a southeasterly direction along the said City of Roanoke=s corporate line to the northern-most corner of the corporate line of the Town of Vinton; thence following the courses of the corporate line between the Town of Vinton and the City of Roanoke in a westerly and southerly direction to a point at the corner of the Town of Vinton corporate line at the Roanoke River and on the City of Roanoke corporate line; thence continuing with the City of Roanoke corporate line in a south and southwesterly direction until the said City of Roanoke corporate line intersects the western right-of-way line of Yellow Mountain Road (Virginia Secondary Route 668); thence continuing with the western right-of-way line of Yellow Mountain Road (Virginia Secondary Route 668) in a southerly direction until its intersection with Mayland Road (Virginia Secondary Route 667); thence in a southeasterly direction with Mayland Road (Virginia Secondary Route 667) until its intersection with Bandy Road (Secondary Route 666); thence in a souther) direction with Band Road Route 666 to its intersection with Crowell Ga Road Route 657„~~.,th_ence in an easterl direction with Crowell Ga Road to the Roanoke/Franklin County line ,thence following the Roanoke/Franklin County line as it meanders in a northeasterly and northerly direction to the Roanoke/Bedford County line to the place of beginning. 3. That the outside boundaries of the thirty-one voting precincts shall be as follows: ~ BENNETT SPRINGS PRECINCT - 107 2 Beginning at a point on the Roanoke/Montgomery County line at the top of Catawba 3 Mountain; thence with the crest of Catawba Mountain in an easterly direction to the top of 4 McAfee Knob; thence with the crest of Tinker Mountain in an easterly direction to the 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Roanoke/Botetourt County line; thence with the Roanoke/Botetourt County line in a southeasterly direction to the southerly right-of-way of Interstate 81; thence west with Interstate 81 to its intersection with Interstate I-581 thence north with Interstate I-581 to its intersection with Loch Haven Lake Drive (Route 5004); thence north with Loch Haven Lake Drive (Route 5004) to , Timberview Road (State Secondary Route 1404); thence in a westerly direction with Timberview Road (State Secondary Route 1404) to the City of Roanoke Water Department west property line; thence north with the City of Roanoke Water Department west property line to the topographic crest of Brushy Mountain; thence with the crest of Brushy Mountain in a southwesterly direction crossing Mason's Creek to the intersection of Catawba Valley Drive (Virginia Route 311) at its intersection with Dutch Oven Road (State Secondary Route 863); thence north with Virginia Route 311 to Plunkett Road (State Route 874); thence west with Plunkett Road (State Route 874), to a point where Mason's Creek crosses under Plunkett Road (State Route 874); thence in anorth-northwesterly direction with Mason's Creek to its intersection with Old Catawba Road (Route 864); thence south with Old Catawba Road (Route 864) to its intersection with Bradshaw Road (State Secondary Route 622); thence with Bradshaw Road (State Secondary Route 622) in a westerly direction to the Roanoke/ Montgomery County line; thence with the Roanoke/Montgomery County line in a northwesterly direction to the place of beginning. Catawba Magisterial District Roanoke Moose Lodge #284 -Voting Place BENT MOUNTAIN PRECINCT - 301 Beginning on the Roanoke/Montgomery County line at the top of Poor Mountain at the intersection of Honeysuckle Road (State Secondary Route 916); thence following the ridge line of Poor Mountain in a generally northeasterly direction to its intersection with Poor Mountain Road (Route 612); fleet; thence continuing in a generally easter+q~ southwesters direction with 7 1 Poor Mountain Road (Route 612), down the slope of Poor Mountain to an elevation of 2800 2 feet; thence following the 2800 feet contour elevation of Poor and Bent Mountains in a 3 generally southern direction to the contours point of intersection with the AEP Company 4 high tension Roanoke-Claytor transmission line; thence easterly with the AEP Company 5 high tension Roanoke-Claytor transmission line down the slope of Bent Mountain to the 6 topographic elevation 2000 feet at a branch of Back Creek; thence with the topographic 7 elevation 2000 feet in a southeasterly direction with the base of Bent Mountain to Dividing 8 Spring Branch; thence southerly with Dividing Spring Branch as it meanders to the 9 Roanoke/Franklin County line at Slings Gap; thence with the Roanoke/Franklin County line 10 in awesterly-southwesterly direction to the Roanoke/Floyd County line; thence with the 11 Roanoke/Floyd County line westerly to the Roanoke/Floyd/Montgomery County line; thence 12 with the Roanoke/Montgomery County line in a northerly direction to the place of beginning. 13 Windsor Hills Magisterial District 14 Bent Mountain Fire Station -Voting Place 15 16 ~~f3i~}SAEIE ORCHARDS PRECINCT -205 17 Beginning at a point of intersection of the Roanoke/Botetourt 18 County line and Challen er Avenue U.S. Route 460 ;thence in a southwesterly direction 19 with Challenger Avenue~U.S. Route 460 20 ' 21 elfree#taR to a point on the east corporate line of the City of Roanoke; thence with the east 22 corporate line of the City of Roanoke in anorth-northwesterly direction to its intersection 23 with Read Mountain Road (State Secondary Route 611); thence in a westerly direction with 24 Read Mountain Road (Secondary Route 611) until it intersects with the crest of Read 25 Mountain extended; thence northeasterly with the crest of Read Mountain until it intersects 26 with the Roanoke/Botetourt County line; thence southeasterly with the Roanoke/Botetourt 27 County line to the place of beginning. 28 Hollins Magisterial District 29 Bonsack B,a~tist Church -Voting Place 30 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 BONSACK PRECINCT - 402 Beginning at a,~oint_on intersection of the Blue Ridge Parkway and_the Roanoke/Botetourt, Co, unty line t,~hence in a southwesterl~r direction with the Blue _Rid e Parkwa to the to o ra hic crest of Stewart's Knob thence with the to o ra hic crest of Stewart's Knob in a wester ly,direction to a oi~n,_t on the east corporate line of the Cit of Roanoke thence with the east cor orate line of the Cit of Roanoke in a north-northwester) direction it its intersection with Challen er Avenue State Route 460 ~ thence in a northeaster) direction to the Roanoke/Botetourt Count line thence with the Roanoke/Botetourt Count line to the Ip,ace of_,_,,beginn~,_ing,; Vinton Ma isterial District Bonsack .United.. Methodist Church„- Voting, Place BOTETOURT SPRINGS PRECINCT - 204 Beginning at the southerly right-of-way of Interstate 81 and Deer Branch Creek; thence south with Deer Branch Creek to Peters Creek Road (Virginia Route 117); thence with Peters Creek Road (Virginia Route 117) in a westerly direction to its intersection with Wood Haven Road (Virginia Secondary Route 628); thence with Wood Haven Road (State Secondary Route 628) west to the west right-of-way of Interstate Route 581; thence north with the west right-of-way line of Interstate Route 581 to Interstate Route 81; thence east with the southerly right-of-way of Interstate 81 to the place of beginning. Hollins Magisterial District Hollins Fire Station -Voting Place BURLINGTON PRECINCT- 202 9 1 Beginning at a point at the intersection of Williamson Road (U. S. Highway 11) and Peters 2 Creek Road (Virginia Route 117); thence west with Peters Creek Road (Virginia Route 117) 3 to its intersection with Wood Haven Road (State Secondary Route 628) and the north 4 corporate limit of the City of Roanoke; thence with the north corporate limit of the City of 5 Roanoke in an east/southeasterlydlrection to 6 Florist Road (State Secondary Route 623); thence with Florist Road (State Secondary 7 Route 623) leaving the north corporate limit of the City of Roanoke in a northerly direction 8 to Williamson Road (U. S. Highway 11); thence north with Williamson Road (U. S. Highway 9 11) to the place of beginning. 10 Hollins Magisterial District 11 Burlington Elementary School -Voting Place 12 13 CASTLE ROCK PRECINCT -305 14 Beginning at a point in the intersection of Electric Road (Virginia Primary Route 419) and 15 Brambleton Avenue (U. S. Highway 221); thence southwesterly with Brambleton Avenue 16 (U. S. Highway 221) to its intersection with Ran Lynn f2~ad Drive (Route 745); thence in 17 a northwesterly direction with Ran Lynn fZaael Drive. (Route 745) to its intersection with 18 South Roselawn Road (State Route 690); thence with South Roselawn Road (State 19 Secondary Route 690) in a northeasterly direction to its intersection with Roselawn Road 20 (State Route 689); thence in a northerly direction with Roselawn Road (State Route 689) 21 to the crossing location of the AEP Company high tension Glen Lynn-Hancock Electric 22 Transmission line; thence with Appalachian Power Company high tension Glen Lyn- 23 Hancock Electric Transmission line in a northeasterly direction to its intersection with 24 Brahma Road (State Secondary Route 1687); thence northwest with Brahma Road (State 25 Secondary Route 1687) to Longhorn Road (State Secondary Route 1687 ~-688); thence 26 north with Longhorn Road (State Secondary Route 1687 X688) to Castle Rock Road (State 27 Secondary Route 702); thence in a westerly direction with Castle Rock Road (State 28 Secondary Route 702) to Stoneybrook Drive (State Secondary Route 1316); thence 29 north/northeasterly with Stoneybrook Drive (State Secondary Route 1316) to Electric Road 30 (Virginia Primary Route 419); thence in a southeasterly/easterly direction with Electric 10 1 Road (Virginia Primary Route 419) to its intersection with Brambleton Avenue (U. S. 2 Highway 221) being the place of beginning. 3 Windsor Hills Magisterial District 4 Cave Spring Junior Hi h School ~~ -Voting Place 5 6 7 CATAWBA PRECINCT - 101 8 Beginning at the top of Brush Mountain at the Montgomery/Roanoke/Craig County line; 9 thence with the Roanoke/Craig County line in a northeasterly direction to the 10 Roanoke/Craig/Botetourt County line; thence with the Roanoke/Botetourt County line in a 11 southerly direction to the crest of Tinker Mountain; thence with the crest of Tinker Mountain 12 in a westerly direction to the top of McAfee Knob on Catawba Mountain; thence continuing 13 in a westerly direction with the crest of Catawba Mountain to the Roanoke/Montgomery 14 County line; thence with the Roanoke/Montgomery County line in a northerly direction to 15 the place of beginning. 16 Catawba Magisterial District 17 Catawba Fire Station -Voting Place 18 1 g CAVE SPRING PRECINCT - 503 20 Beginning at a point at the intersection of Brambleton Avenue (U. S. Highway 221) and 21 Colonial Avenue (State Secondary Route 720); thence east with Colonial Avenue (State 22 Secondary Route 720) to Penn Forest Boulevard (State Secondary Route 687); thence 23 continuing east with Penn Forest Boulevard (State Secondary Route 687) to Chaparral 24 Drive (State Secondary Route 800); thence southwest with Chaparral Drive (State 25 Secondary Route 800) to Merriman Road (State Secondary Route 613); thence with 26 Merriman Road (State Secondary Route 613) southeasterly to Cartwright Drive (State 27 Secondary Route 1726); thence with Cartwright Drive (State Secondary Route 1726) in a 28 southwesterly direction to Crystal Creek Drive (State Secondary Route 897); thence with 29 Crystal Creek Drive (State Secondary Route 897) in a westerly direction to Brambleton 30 Avenue (U. S. Highway 221); thence with Brambleton Avenue (U. S. Highway 221) in a 11 1 northerly direction to the place of beginning. 2 Cave Spring Magisterial District 3 Masonic Lod e/Communit Center -Voting Place 4 5 CLEARBROOK PRECINCT - 505 6 Beginning at a point in the City of Roanoke corporate line where Franklin Road (U. S. 220) 7 south exits the City; thence with the southerly boundary of the City of Roanoke in the 8 northeasterly direction to a point where it intersects Yellow Mountain Road (Secondary 9 Route 668); thence in a southerly direction until Yellow Mountain Road (Route 668) 10 intersects Mayland Road (Route 667); thence in a southeasterly direction with Mayland 11 Road (Secondary Route 667) until it intersects with Bandy Road (Secondary Route 666); 12 thence in a souther) direction with Band Road Route 666 to its intersection with Crowell 13 Ga Road Route 657 ~ thence in an easterl direction with Crowell Ga to the 14 Roanoke/Franklin County line 15 16 17 ;thence with the Roanoke/Franklin 18 County line in a southwesterly to northwesterly direction as it meanders along the crest of 19 the Blue Ridge Mountains to Merriman Road (State Secondary Route 613); thence 20 northerly along Merriman Road (State Secondary Route 613) until it intersects the Blue 21 Ridge Parkway; thence in a southeasterly and northeasterly direction with the Blue Ridge 22 Parkway until it intersects Franklin Road (U. S. 220); thence northerly with Franklin Road 23 (U. S. 220) to the place of beginning. 24 Cave Spring Magisterial District 25 Clearbrook Elementary School -Voting Place 26 27 28 COTTON HILL PRECINCT - 501 29 Beginning at a point on the western right-of-way of Brambleton Avenue (U. S. Highway 30 221) at its intersection with Crystal Creek Drive (State Secondary Route 897); thence with 12 1 Brambleton Avenue (U. S. Highway 221) to Poage Valley Road Extension (State 2 Secondary Route 690); thence south with Poage Valley Road Extension (State Secondary 3 Route 690) to Dawnwood Road (State Secondary Route 691); thence in a southerly 4 direction with Dawnwood Road (State Secondary Route 691), if extended would intersect 5 to the Franklin/Roanoke County line; thence in an easterly direction with the crest of the 6 Blue Ridge Mountains and the Franklin/Roanoke County line to Merriman Road (State 7 Secondary Route 613) northerly direction with Merriman Road (State Secondary Route 8 613) through Starkey to Crystal Creek Drive (State Secondary Route 897); thence with 9 Crystal Creek Drive (State Secondary Route 897) in a westerly direction to the point of 10 beginning. 11 Cave Spring Magisterial District 12 Penn Forest Elementary School -Voting Place 13 14 15 GARST MILL PRECINCT - 306 16 Beginning at a point on Electric Road (Virginia Primary Route 419) where the west fork of 17 Mud Lick Creek crosses Electric Road (Route 419); thence with the west fork of Mud Lick 18 Creek as it meanders in a northeasterly direction to the southerly corporate line of the City 19 of Roanoke; thence with the corporate line of the City of Roanoke in a northeasterly and 20 southeasterly direction to a pointwhere it crosses Brambleton Avenue (U. S. Highway 221); 21 thence with Brambleton Avenue (U. S. Highway 221) in a southwesterly direction to its 22 intersection with Electric Road (Virginia Primary Route 419); thence with Electric Road 23 (Virginia Primary Route 419) in a northwesterly direction to the place of beginning. 24 Windsor Hills Magisterial District 25 Library Headquarters -Voting Place 26 27 GLENVAR PRECINCT - 103 28 Beginning at a point on the Roanoke/Montgomery County line where U. S. Interstate 81 29 intersects that line; thence with the said U. S. Interstate 81 in a northeasterly direction to 30 its intersection with , 13 1 the western most corner of the City of Salem corporate line; thence in 2 a generally northeasterly direction with the said City of Salem corporate line to a point 3 where Dry Branch forks into an easterly and westerly fork; thence with the easterly fork of 4 the said Dry Branch as it meanders in generally a northwesterly direction to where this 5 branch or hollow intersects ~t with the AEP ower line thence followin the AEP 6 ower line in an easterl direction to intersection with Catawba Valle Drive Route 311 7 thence in a norther) direction with Catawba Valle Drive Route 311 to its intersection with 8 the topographic crest of Fort Lewis Mountain, g ~ thence west with the to o ra hic crest of Fort Lewis 10 Mountain to its intersection with Forest Acre Trail Route 700 ~ thence with Forest Acre Trail 11 Route 700 back to the to o ra hic crest of Fort Lewis Mountain thence with the 12 to o ra hic crest of Fort Lewis Mountain to its intersection with the Roanoke/Mont omer 13 Count line thence with the Roanoke/Mont omer Count line to the oint of be innin . 14 Catawba Magisterial District 15 Glenvar Elementar School -Voting Place 16 17 18 GREEN HILL PRECINCT -106 19 Beginning at a point on U.S. Interstate 81 at its intersection ' 20 with the City of Salem corporate limits; 21 ,thence with the west corporate line of the City of Salem 22 in a southerly direction and with the south corporate line of the City of Salem in an easterly 23 and southerly direction to its intersection with Twelve O'Clock Knob Road (Route 694); 24 thence with Twelve O'Clock Knob Road (Route 694) in a southerly direction to a point 25 where it intersects with a gas transmission line at the crest of 12 Twelve O'Clock Knob 2g ;thence with the crest of 12 Twelve O'Clock Knob and with the crest of 27 Poor Mountain, the dividing line between Catawba and the Windsor Hills Magisterial 28 District, in a westerly and southwesterly direction to the intersection of Poor Mountain Road 29 (State Secondary Route 612); thence following the crest of Poor Mountain in a generally 30 southwesterly direction to its intersection with Honeysuckle Road (State Secondary Route 14 1 916) on the Montgomery/Roanoke County line; thence with the Montgomery/Roanoke 2 County line in a northerly direction to U.S. Interstate 81; thence in a northeasterly direction 3 with U.S. Interstate 81 to the point of beginning. 4 Catawba Magisterial District 5 Fort Lewis Ba tist Church -Voting Place 6 7 8 HOLLINS PRECINCT - 206 9 Beginning at the southerly right-of-way of Interstate 81 and the Roanoke/Botetourt County 10 Line; thence with the southerly right-of-way of Interstate 81 in a westerly direction to Deer 11 Branch Creek; thence south with Deer Branch Creek as it meanders to Peters Creek Road 12 (Virginia Route 117); thence easterly with Peters Creek Road (Virginia Route 117) to its 13 intersection with Williamson Road (Route 11); thence in a southeasterly direction with 14 Williamson Road (Route 11) to its intersection with Clubhouse Drive (State Secondary 15 Route 1821); thence in a southeasterly direction with Clubhouse Drive (State Secondary 16 Route 1821) extended until it intersects the east fork of Carvins Creek; thence northeasterly 17 with Carvins Creek as it meanders until it intersections Plantation Road (Virginia Primary 18 Route 115); thence in a northwesterly direction with Plantation Road (Virginia Primary 19 Route 115) until it intersects Williamson Road (Route 11) until it intersects the 20 Roanoke/Botetourt County line; thence with the Roanoke/Botetourt County line in a 21 northwesterly direction to the place of beginning. 22 Hollins Magisterial District 23 Hollins Librar -Voting Place 24 25 HUNTING HILLS PRECINCT - 507 26 Beginning at a point where Electric Road (U.S. Route 419) intersects the corporate line of 27 the City of Roanoke; thence in a southeasterly direction with the corporate line of the City 28 of Roanoke and partially with Franklin Road (Route 220) to a point where the said Franklin 29 Road (Route 220) intersects the Blue Ridge Parkway; thence with the Blue Ridge Parkway 30 in a southwesterly and then northwesterly direction to its intersection with Merriman Road 15 1 (Route 613); thence in a northerly direction with Merriman Road (State Secondary Route 2 613) to Starkey Road (Secondary Route 904); thence in an easterly and northerly direction 3 with Starkey Road (State Secondary Route 904) to its intersection with Electric Road (State 4 Primary Route 419); thence in a northeasterly direction with Electric Road (State Primary 5 Route 419) to the place of beginning. 6 Cave Spring Magisterial District 7 Penn Forest Church of God -Voting Place 8 9 10 LINDENWOOD PRECINCT - 405 11 Beginning at a point of intersection of the east corporate limit of the City of Roanoke and 12 the topographic crest of Stewart's Knob; thence in a easterly direction with the topographic 13 crest of Stewart's Knob to the Blue Ridge Parkway; thence in a northeasterly direction with 14 the Blue Ridge Parkway to the Botetourt/Roanoke County Line; thence south with the 15 Botetourt/Roanoke County line to its intersection with the Botetourt/Bedford/Roanoke 16 County line; thence with the Bedford/Roanoke County line in a southerly direction to the 17 Roanoke River; thence west with the Roanoke River to Wolf Creek at the east corporate 18 limit of the Town of Vinton; thence north with Wolf Creek and the east corporate limit of the 19 Town of Vinton to a oint where Wolf Creek exists from the east cor orate limit of the Town 20 of Vinton thence northeaster) with Wolf Creek to its intersection with an ima ina line 21 extendin from the end of Iv Lane Route 1023 ~ thence with Iv Lane to its intersection 22 with Sunflower Drive Route 1019 ~ thence with Sunflower Drive Route 1019 to its 23 intersection with Mountain View Road Route 651 ~ thence in a wester) direction with 24 Mountain View Road Route 651 until its intersection with the east cor orate limit of the 25 Town of Vinton thence with the east cor orate limit of the Town of Vinton to the place of 26 beginning. 27 Vinton Magisterial District 28 William B rd Hi h School -Voting Place 29 30 MASON VALLEY PRECINCT -102 16 1 Beginning at a point on the Roanoke/Montgomery County line at its intersection with 2 Bradshaw Road (Route 622); thence in an easterly direction with Bradshaw Road (Route 3 622) to its intersection with Old Catawba Road (Route 864); thence north with Old Catawba 4 Road (Route 864) to its intersection with Mason's Creek; thence with Mason's Creek in a 5 southerly direction to its intersection with Plunkett Road (Route 874); thence in an easterly 6 direction with Plunkett Road (Route 874) to its intersection with Catawba Valley Road 7 (Virginia Route 311); thence in a southerly direction with Catawba Valley Road (Virginia 8 Route 311) to the topographic crest of Fort Lewis Mountain; thence leaving 9 Road (Virginia Route 311) with the topographic crest of Fort Lewis Mountain to its 10 intersection with Forest Acre Trail Route 70._O~;,thence with Forest Acre Trail Route 700 11 back to its intersection with the to o ra hic crest of Fort Lewis Mountain; thence with 12 to o ra hic crest of Fort Lewis Mountain in a westerly direction to the 13 Roanoke/Montgomery County line; thence with the Roanoke/Montgomery County line in 14 a northwesterly direction to the place of beginning. 15 Catawba Magisterial District 16 Mason Cove Elementary School -Voting Place 17 18 MOUNTAIN VIEW PRECINCT - 203 19 Beginning at a point on the Roanoke/Botetourt County line at its intersection with 20 Williamson Road (U. S. Primary Route 11); thence in a westerly direction with Williamson 21 Road (U. S. Primary Route 11) to its intersection with Plantation Road (Virginia Primary 22 Route 115); thence in a southerly direction with Plantation Road (Virginia Primary Route 23 115) to a point where it intersects with the north corporate line of the City of Roanoke; 24 thence northeasterly with the corporate line of the City of Roanoke as it meanders until it 25 intersects with Read Mountain Road (Secondary Route 611); thence in an easterly direction 26 with Read Mountain Road (Secondary Route 611) until it intersects with the crest of Read 27 Mountain Extended; thence northeasterly with the crest of Read Mountain until it intersects 28 with the Roanoke/Botetourt County line; thence northwesterly with the said 29 Roanoke/Botetourt County line to the place of beginning. 30 Hollins Magisterial District 17 1 Mountain View Elementary School -Voting Place 2 3 4 MOUNT PLEASANT PRECINCT - 406 5 Beginning at the west corporate line of the Town of Vinton and the east corporate line of 6 the City of Roanoke at the Roanoke River; thence with the Roanoke River in a 7 southwesterly direction to the Roanoke/Bedford County line; thence in a southerly direction 8 with the Roanoke River/Roanoke County/Bedford County line to the 9 Roanoke/Franklin/Bedford County line; thence in a southerly direction with the 10 Roanoke/Franklin County line to Crowell Gap 11 Road (State Route 657) ;thence in a 12 northwesterly direction with Crowell Gap Road (State Secondary Route 657 G6~) to its 13 intersection with Bandy Road (Route 666); thence continuing with Bandy Road (Route 666) 14 in a „norther) direction until it intersects with Mayland Road (State Route 15 667); thence in a northwesterly direction with Crowell Gap Road (State Route 657 6fr7j until 16 it intersects Yellow Mountain Road (State Route 668); thence in a northerly direction with 17 Yellow Mountain Road (State Route 668) until it intersects with the southern corporate line 18 of the City of Roanoke; thence with the southern corporate line of the City of Roanoke in 19 a northeasterly direction to the place of beginning. 20 Vinton Magisterial District 21 Mount Pleasant Elementary School -Voting Place 22 23 24 MOUNT VERNON PRECINCT -506 25 Beginning at a point on Colonial Avenue (State Secondary Route 720) and the south 26 corporate limit of the City of Roanoke; thence with Colonial Avenue (State Secondary 27 Route 720) in a southwesterly direction to Brambleton Avenue (U. S. Highway 221); thence 28 in a northeasterly direction with Brambleton Avenue (Route 221) to the south corporate limit 29 of the City of Roanoke; thence with the south corporate limit of the City of Roanoke in a 30 southeasterly direction to the place of beginning. 18 1 Cave Spring Magisterial District 2 Brambleton Center -Voting Place 3 4 NORTHSIDE PRECINCT - 104 5 Beginning at a point at the intersection of Peters Creek Road Route 117 6 and Wood Haven Road (State Secondary Route 628); thence in a northwesterly direction 7 with Wood Haven Road (State Secondary Route 628) to its intersection with Green Ridge 8 Road (Route 629); thence in a southerly direction with Green Ridge Road (Route 629)to 9 its intersection with Twilight Road (Route 1577); thence in an easterly direction with Twilight 10 Road (Route 1577) to its intersection with North Lake Drive (Route 1524); thence in a 11 southeasterly direction with North Lake Drive (Route 1524) to its intersection with Peters 12 Creek Road (Virginia Route 117); thence east with Peters Creek Road (Route 117) sate} 13 14 15 16 17 to the place of 18 beginning. 19 Catawba Magisterial District 20 Northside High School -Voting Place 21 22 NORTH VINTON PRECINCT - 403 23 Beginning at the east corporate line of the City of Roanoke and the west corporate line of 24 the Town of Vinton at Virginia Avenue; thence with the corporate line of the Town of Vinton 25 in a northeasterly and easterly direction to its intersection with Mountain View Road Route 26 651 ~ thence in an easterl direction til its intersection with Sunflower Drive Route 1019; 27 thence with Sunflower Drive Route 1019 in a souther) direction to its intersection with Iv 28 Lane Route 1023 ~ thence followin Iv Lane Route 1023 alon anima inar line to Wolf 29 Creek; thence with Wolf Creek to the east cor orate line of the Town of Vinton and with 30 east corporate line of the Town of Vinton in a southerly direction to Washington Avenue; 19 1 thence with Washington Avenue in a westerly direction to South Pollard Street; thence with 2 South Pollard Street in a southerly direction to Virginia Avenue at First Street; thence with 3 Virginia Avenue in a westerly direction to the place of beginning. 4 Vinton Magisterial District 5 Vinton Baptist Church -Voting Place 6 7 g OAK GROVE PRECINCT - 304 9 Beginning at a point on the east side of Electric Road (Virginia Primary Route 419) and on 10 the north side of Keagy Road (Virginia Secondary Highway 685) being a point on the City 11 of Salem/City of Roanoke/Roanoke County boundary; thence with the west corporate line 12 of the City of Roanoke and the east side of Electric Road (Virginia Primary Route 419) in 13 asouth-southeasterly direction to the intersection with Stoneybrook Drive (State Secondary 14 Route 1316); thence in a southwesterly direction with Stoneybrook Drive (State Secondary 15 Route 1316) to Castle Rock Road (State Secondary Route 702); thence in an easterly 16 direction with Castle Rock Road (State Secondary Route 702) to Longhorn Road (State 17 Secondary Route 1688); thence south with Longhorn Road (State Secondary Route x-68$ 18 1687) to Brahma Road (State Secondary Route ~-68.71689 ;thence southeast with Brahma 19 Road (State Secondary Route ~7 1689) to the crossing of the AEP Company high 20 tension Glen Lyn-Hancock electric transmission line; thence with the AEP Company high 21 tension Glen Lyn-Hancock electric transmission line in a southwesterly direction to 22 Roselawn Road (State Secondary Route 689); thence northwest with Roselawn Road 23 (State Secondary Route 689) to Mount Chestnut Road (State Secondary Route 692); 24 thence west with Mount Chestnut Road (State Secondary Route 692) to the crossing 25 location of a gas pipeline; thence with this gas pipeline in a northerly and then westerly 26 direction to its intersection with the crest of 12 O'Clock Knob at Twelve 27 O'Clock Knob Road (Route 694); thence with Twelve O'Clock Knob Road (Route 694) in 28 a northerly direction to the corporate line of the City of Salem; thence with the corporate 29 line of the City of Salem in an easterly direction to the place of beginning. 30 Windsor Hills Magisterial District 20 1 Oak Grove Elementary School -Voting Place 2 3 4 OGDEN PRECINCT - 504 5 Beginning at a point on Colonial Avenue (State Secondary Route 720) and the south 6 corporate limit of the City of Roanoke; thence with Colonial Avenue (State Secondary 7 Route 720) in a southwesterly direction to Penn Forest Boulevard (State Secondary Route 8 687); thence east with Penn Forest Boulevard (State Secondary Route 687) to Starkey 9 Road (State Secondary Route 904); thence northeast with Starkey Road (State Secondary 10 Route 904) to Electric Road (Virginia Route 419); thence northeast with Electric Road 11 (Virginia Route 419) to the south corporate limit of the City of Roanoke; thence north and 12 westerly with the south corporate limit of the City of Roanoke to the place of beginning. 13 Cave Spring Magisterial District 14 Green Valley Elementary School -Voting Place 15 16 17 PENN FOREST PRECINCT - 502 18 Beginning at a point at the intersection of Penn Forest Boulevard (State Secondary Route 19 687) and Chaparral Drive (State Secondary Route 800); thence with Chaparral Drive (State 20 Secondary Route 800) in a southwesterly direction to Merriman Road (State Secondary 21 Route 613); thence southeasterly with Merriman Road (State Secondary Route 613) to 22 Cartwright Drive (State Secondary Route 1525); thence in a southwesterly direction with 23 Cartwright Drive (State Secondary Route 1525) to Crystal Creek Drive (State Secondary 24 Route 897); thence east with Crystal Creek Drive (State Secondary Route 897) to 25 Merriman Road (State Secondary Route 613); thence with Merriman Road (State 26 Secondary Route 613) in a southeasterly direction to Starkey Road (State Secondary 27 Route 904); thence east and north with Starkey Road (State Secondary Route 904) to 28 Penn Forest Boulevard (State Secondary Route 687); thence with Penn Forest Boulevard 29 (State Route 687) in a westerly direction to the place of beginning. 30 Cave Spring Magisterial District 21 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Cave Spring High School -Voting Place PETERS CREEK PRECINCT - 105 Beginning at a point on Wood Haven Road (Route 628) where the said Wood Haven Road (Route 628) crosses the western right-of-way line of U.S. Route 581; thence north with the west right-of-way line of Interstate 581 crossing Interstate Route 81 to #+~e its intersection with Loch Haven Lake Drive Route 5004 ~ thence north,.,, er~x,,with Loch Haven Lake Drive Route 5004 to its intersection with Timberview Road (Route 1404); ,thence in a westerly direction with State Secondary Route 1404 to the City of Roanoke Water Department west property line; thence north with the City of Roanoke Water Department west property line to the topographic crest of Brushy Mountain; thence with the topographic crest of Brushy Mountain in a southwesterly direction crossing Mason Creek to the intersection of Catawba Valley Road (Virginia Route 311)1-a~-e} Dutch Oven Road (State Secondary Route 683 863 and the AEP ower line; thence in a wester) direction with the AEP ower line to its intersection with the east fork of Dry Branch ' ; thence with the hollow which is the east fork of Dry Branch in a southerly direction as it meanders to a point where Dry Branch divides into an east and west fork at the north corporate line of the City of Salem; thence with the north corporate line of the City of Salem and in a generally northeasterly direction to its intersection with Electric Road (State Route 419); thence with the east corporate line of the City of Salem in asouth-northeasterly direction to a point on the City of Salem, Roanoke County, and City of Roanoke line at Green Ridge Road Route 629); thence in a setrt~ northeasterly direction with Green Ridge Road Route 629~to its intersection with Cove Road Route 780 ;thence in an easterly direction with Cove Road Route 780 to its intersection with Peters Creek Road Route 22 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 117 : thence in a northeasterly direction with Peters Creek Road Route 117 to its intersection with North Lake Drive Route 1524 ; thence in a northwesterly direction with North Lake Drive Route 1524 to its intersection with Twilight Road Route 1577 ;thence in a westerly direction with Twilight Road Route 1577 to its intersection with Green Ridge Road Route 629 ;thence north with Green Ridge Road Route 629~to its intersection with Wood Haven Roadv(Route 628 ;thence east with Wood Haven Road Route 628 to the place of beginning. Catawba Magisterial District Glen Cove Elementary School -Voting Place PLANTATION PRECINCT - 201 Beginning at a point where Williamson Road (Route 11) intersects Clubhouse Drive (Route 1821); thence southeasterly with Williamson Road (Route 11) until it intersects Florist Road (Secondary Route 623); thence in a southeasterly direction with Florist Road (Secondary Route 623) until it intersects the north corporate line of the City of Roanoke; thence in an easterly direction with the north corporate line of the City of Roanoke until it intersects Plantation Road (Virginia Primary Route 115); thence in a northwesterly direction with Plantation Road (Virginia Primary Route 115) to a point where the said road intersects the east fork of Carvins Creek; thence with the east fork of Carvins Creek in a southwesterly direction as it meanders to a point opposite the center line extended of Clubhouse Drive (Secondary Route 1821); thence northwesterly with the center line of Clubhouse Drive (Secondary Route 1821) to its intersection with Williamson Road (U. S. Route 11) the place of beginning. Hollins Magisterial District Roanoke Valley Christian Schools -Voting Place POAGES MILL PRECINCT - 302 Beginning at a point on the western right-of-way of Brambleton Avenue (U. S. Highway 221) and its intersection with Ran Lynn Drive (Route 745); thence in a northwesterly direction with Ran Lynn Drive (Route 745) to its intersection with South Roselawn Road 23 1 (State Route 690); thence with South Roselawn Road (State Secondary Route 690) in a 2 northeasterly direction to its intersection with Roselawn Road (State Route 689); thence 3 in a northerly direction with Roselawn Road (State Route 689) to Mount Chestnut Drive 4 (State Secondary Route 692); thence west with Mount Chestnut Drive (State Secondary 5 Route 692) to the crossing location of a gas pipeline; thence with this gas pipeline in a 6 northerly then westerly direction to its intersection with the crest of Twelve O'Clock Knob 7 ;thence with the topographic crest of Twelve O'Clock Knob and Poor 8 Mountain in awesterly-southwesterly direction to Poor Mountain Road (State Secondary 9 Route 612); thence in a generally southeasterly wester) direction with Poor Mountain Road 10 (Route 61~d~eett~rr down the slope of Poor Mountain to an elevation of 2800 feet; thence 11 following the 2800-foot contour elevation of Poor and Bent Mountains in a generally 12 southern direction to the contours point of intersection with AEP Company high-tension 13 Roanoke-Claytor transmission line; thence easterly with the AEP Company high tension 14 Roanoke-Claytor transmission line down the slope of Bent Mountain to the topographic 15 elevation 2,000 feet at a branch of Back Creek; thence with the topographic elevation 2,000 16 feet as it traverses in a southeasterly direction with the base of Bent Mountain to Dividing 17 Spring Branch; thence southerly with Dividing Spring Branch as it meanders to the 18 Roanoke/Franklin County line; thence with the Roanoke/Franklin County line easterly to its 19 intersection with Dawnwood Road (State Secondary Route 691); thence in a northerly 20 direction with Dawnwood Road (State Secondary Route 691) to its intersection with Poage 21 Valley Road Extension (State Secondary Route 690); thence in a northerly direction with 22 Poage Valley Road Extension (State Secondary Route 690) to the intersection of U.S. 23 Highway 221; thence with U. S. Highway 221 to the place of beginning. 24 Windsor Hills Magisterial District 25 Back Creek Elementary School -Voting Place 26 27 28 SOUTH VINTON PRECINCT - 404 29 Beginning at the east corporate line of the City of Roanoke and the west corporate line of 30 the Town of Vinton at Virginia Avenue; thence with Virginia Avenue in an easterly direction 24 s~ f 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 to Pollard Street at First Street; thence with South Pollard Street in a northerly direction to Washington Avenue; thence with Washington Avenue in an easterly direction to Wolf Creek being the east corporate line of the Town of Vinton; thence with Wolf Creek and the east corporate line of the Town of Vinton in a southerly direction to the Roanoke River; thence in a westerly direction with the Roanoke River and the south corporate line of the Town of Vinton to Tinker Creek being the east corporate line of the City of Roanoke and the west corporate line of the Town of Vinton; thence with Tinker Creek in a northwesterly direction to the place of beginning. Vinton Magisterial District Charles R. Hill Senior Center -Voting Place WINDSOR HILLS PRECINCT - 303 Beginning at the City of Roanoke corporate line where Electric Road (Virginia Primary Route 419) intersects Glen Heather Drive Route 71~; thence easterly then southerly with the corporate line of the City of Roanoke to a point where the said corporate line intersects Mud Lick Creek; thence with the west fork of Mud Lick Creek as it meanders in a southwesterly direction to Electric Road (Virginia Primary Route 419); thence north with Electric Road (Virginia Primary Route 419); to the place of beginning. Windsor Hills Magisterial District Our Lady of Nazareth Catholic Church -Voting Place 25 .' 1 2 , 3 , 4 5 6 7 4. That certified copies of this ordinance shall be mailed by the Clerk to the local 8 electoral board, the Secretary of the Commonwealth, the State Board of Elections, and the 9 Division of Legislative Services. 10 5. That this ordinance shall be effective from and after the date of its adoption. 11 On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the 12 following recorded vote: 13 AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix 14 NAYS: None 15 16 A COPY TESTE: 17 18 19 ~' 2p Brenda J. Holto , CMC 21 Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors 22 cc: File 23 Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 24 Diane St. John, Registrar 25 Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development 26 Gary Robertson, Director, Utility 27 G:\BOARD\2001 \June26\6-26redistrict#13.doc 26 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. "'~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 26, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: ORDINANCE REAPPORTIONING THE REPRESENTATION IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, BY ALTERING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE ELECTION DISTRICTS, BY ESTABLISHING VOTING PRECINCTS THEREFOR, INCORPORATING A MAP SHOWING THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID DISTRICTS AND PRECINCTS, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: This ordinance amending the election district and precinct boundaries as a result of the population changes in the County as reported by the 2000 federal census is submitted to the Board of Supervisors for its consideration. The first reading of this ordinance is scheduled for June 12, 2001. A second reading and public hearing is scheduled for June 26, 2001. Your redistricting committee submitted several optional redistricting plans to the Board in work session on May 22, 2001, and the Board indicated its preference for the plan that is being submitted for consideration. The committee has continued to refine and modify this preferred plan. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This ordinance adjusts the boundaries of each of the election districts, and also adjusts the boundaries of the various precincts to reflect the election district changes. At the May 22, 2001 work session the committee described one redistricting plan that would move the entire Woodlands Precinct #207 from Hollins to the Catawba Magisterial District. Upon closer review the committee recommends eliminating this precinct and dividing it at Woodhaven Rd. between the Hollins and Catawba Districts. This revision improves the population differences between the districts, and avoids moving an appointed member of the Board of Zoning Appeals from one district to the other. The Cave Spring District boundary with the Vinton District is changed to follow Bandy Rd. and Crowell Gap Rd. The Vinton District boundary with the Cave Spring District is changed as described above, and G:\ATTORNEY\PMM\Redistricting\districts&precinctsord.rpt.frm 1 -~ its boundary with the Hollins District is moved to Challenger Drive (Route 460). The Hollins District is changed as described above (with Catawba, Woodhaven Rd. is the new boundary; with Vinton the new boundary is Challenger Dr.). The Windsor Hills District remains unchanged. These election district changes, as well as new General Assembly House and Senate boundary changes, required numerous precinct changes. These changes are included in the attached ordinance. Major precinct changes are identified as follows: -Woodlands Precinct #207 has been eliminated by dividing it between Northside Precinct # 104 and Botetourt Springs Precinct #204. -Peters Creek Precinct # 105 is split at Forest Acre Trail between Mason Valley Precinct # 102 and Glenvar Precinct #103, due to changes in the 21st and 22nd Senate Districts. - new Bonsack Precinct #402 is created to include the area between the old Vinton District boundary and the new District boundary at Challenger Dr. The old Bonsack Precinct #205 has been renamed the Orchards Precinct and it reflects the new District boundary change. - Lindenwood Precinct #405 is divided at Mountain View Rd., Sunflower Dr., Ivy Ln. and Wolf Creek and added to North Vinton Precinct #403 due to changes in the 11th and 17th House of Delegates Districts. - Mt. Pleasant Precinct #406 and Clearbrook Precinct #505 boundaries are amended to reflect the changes in the boundary between Vinton and Cave Spring Districts. The ideal Total Population is 17,156. These amended districts now result in the following: Total Population Population Deviation Deviation Percentage Catawba 16,801 -355 -2.07 Windsor Hills 17,360 204 1.19 Cave Spring 17,253 93 0.57 Vinton 16,691 -465 -2.71 Hollins 17.673 517 3.01 Total 5.72 Finally several polling places have been changed. This proposed ordinance provides for election districts composed of compact and contiguous territory and it has clearly defined and clearly observable boundaries. Its total population percentage deviation is 5.72%. Finally it makes minimal changes to the election districts so as to minimize any inconvenience or confusion for our citizens. G:\ATTORNEY\PMM\Redistricting\districts&precinctaord.rpt.frm 2 (~-5 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board receive comments from citizens at the public hearing and then adopt this ordinance. Respectfully submitted, ~;~-~Mn .`~1~ Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Motion by Vote No Yes Abs Church Johnson McNamara Minnix Nickens G:\ATTORNEY\PMM\Redistricting\districts&precinctsord.rpt.frm 3 ,~. d ~'~'? AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 26, 2001 ORDINANCE REAPPORTIONING THE REPRESENTATION IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, BY ALTERING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE ELECTION DISTRICTS, BY ESTABLISHING VOTING PRECINCTS THEREFOR, INCORPORATING A MAP SHOWING THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID DISTRICTS AND PRECINCTS, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE WHEREAS, on February 27, 2001, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County held a public hearing to receive comments on developing guidelines for the redistricting of Roanoke County in accordance with the decennial census; and WHEREAS, on March 13, 2002, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County adopted Guidelines for the 2001 Redistricting of Roanoke County. WHEREAS, legal notice of a public hearing concerning the adoption of an ordinance establishing magisterial districts for the County of Roanoke was provided as required by law; and WHEREAS, the first reading on this ordinance was held June 12, 2001; and the second reading and public hearing was held on June 26, 2001; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of SUPERVISORS of Roanoke County, as follows: 1. That there shall be established in Roanoke County five magisterial or election districts to be known and designated as follows: Catawba Magisterial District Hollins Magisterial District Vinton Magisterial District Cave Spring Magisterial District Windsor Hills Magisterial District from each of which there shall be elected one member of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County; U: \ WPDOCS\REDIS\redistricting. ordinance.wpd Q-5 and 2. That the outside boundaries of the five magisterial districts shall be as follows: Catawba Magisterial District Beginning at the common corner between Craig, Montgomery, and Roanoke counties; thence with the line between Craig and Roanoke counties along the crest of North and Brush Mountains in a northeastern direction to the common corner in the line between Roanoke, Craig, and Botetourt counties; thence with the line between Roanoke and Botetourt counties in a southeasterly direction to the southerly right-of--way line of Interstate 81; thence with the southerly right-of--way of Interstate 81 and in a westerly direction to its intersection with Interstate 581; thence in a southerly direction with Interstate 581 to its intersection with Woodhaven Roac (Rout 628 thence in asoutheasterly direction with Woodhaven Road (Route 628) to its intersection with Peters Creek Road (Route 117), said point being on the northerly boundary of the City of Roanoke and the northerly right-of--way of Peters Creek Road (Route 117); thence in the southwesterly direction of Peters Creek Road (Route 117) and with the City of Roanoke corporate lines to their intersection with Cove Road (Route 116); thence with Cove Road (Route 116) and with the City of Roanoke corporate line in a westerly and southwesterly direction to its intersection with the east corporate line of the City of Salem; thence with the east corporate line of the City of Salem in a northwesterly direction to Electric Road (Virginia Primary Route 419); thence with the east corporate line of the City of Salem and Electric Road (Virginia Primary Route 419) to Interstate 81 and the north corporate line of the City of Salem; thence with the north corporate line of the City of Salem and Interstate 81 in a southwesterly direction into the west corporate line of the City of Salem; thence with the corporate line of the City of Salem in a southerly direction to a point of intersection with Twelve O'Clock Knob Road (Route 694); thence in a southerly direction with Twelve O'Clock Knob Road (Route 694) to a point where it intersects with a gas transmission line at the crest of Twelve O'Clock Knob (elevation 2683); thence with the crest of Twelve O'Clock Knob and with the crest of Poor Mountain, the dividing line between the Catawba and the Windsor Hills Magisterial Districts, in a westerly and southwesterly direction to its intersection with Poor Mountain Road (State Secondary Route 612); thence following the ridge line of Poor Mountain in generally southwesterly direction to a point of intersection with Honeysuckle Road (State Secondary Route 916) at the Roanoke/Montgomery County line; thence with the Roanoke/Montgomery County line in a northerly direction to the place of beginning. U:\ WPDOCS\REDIS\redistricting.ordinance.wpd l~- ~ Windsor Hills Magisterial District Beginning at a point on the east side of Electric Road (Virginia Primary Route 419) and the north side of Keagy Road (Virginia Secondary Highway 685) a common corner on the City of Salem/City of Roanoke/Roanoke County boundary; thence with the west corporate line of the City of Roanoke and the east side of Electric Road (Virginia Primary Route 419) in asouth-southeasterly direction to the intersection of Glen Heather Road (Virginia Highway 713); thence with the west corporate line of the City of Roanoke and the south side of Glen Heather Road (Virginia Highway 713) in an easterly direction to the intersection with Grandin Road Extension (State Secondary Route 686); thence with the west corporate line of the City of Roanoke and the south side of Grandin Road Extension (State Secondary Route 686) in an easterly direction to the west outside boundary of Taryn Hill Subdivision; thence with the west corporate line of the City of Roanoke to Garst Mill Road (Route 682); thence with the west corporate line of the City of Roanoke and the south side of Garst Mill Road (Route 682) in an east-northeasterly direction to the intersection of Grandin Road Extension (State Secondary Route 686); thence with the west corporate line of the City of Roanoke and the south side of Grandin Road Extension (State Secondary Route 686) in an easterly direction to the center of Mudlick Creek; thence with the west corporate line of the Ciry of Roanoke to Brambleton Avenue (U. S. Highway 221); thence leaving the corporate line of the City of Roanoke and with Brambleton Avenue (U. S. Highway 221) in a southwesterly direction to Poage Valley Road Extension (State Secondary Route 690); thence southerly with Poage Valley Road Extension (State Secondary Route 690) to Dawnwood Road (State Secondary Route 691); thence with Dawnwood Road (State Secondary Route 691) in a southerly direction to the Roanoke/Franklin County line; thence with the Roanoke/Franklin County line as it meanders in a southwesterly direction along the crest of Blue Ridge Mountains to its intersection with the Roanoke/Floyd County line; thence with the Roanoke/Floyd County line westerly to its intersection with the common corner of the Roanoke/Montgomery/Floyd county line; thence with the Roanoke/Montgomery County line in a northerly direction to the crest of Poor Mountain at its intersection with Honeysuckle Road (State Secondary Route 916); thence along the crest of Poor Mountain in a generally northeasterly direction thence continuing along the crest of Poor Mountain and Twelve O'Clock Knob to a point where a gas transmission line crosses the crest of Twelve O'Clock Knob (elevation 2683) at Twelve O'Clock Knob Road; thence with Twelve O'Clock Knob Road in a northerly direction to its intersection with the corporate line of the City of Salem; thence with the corporate line U: \WPDOCS\REDIS\redistricting.ordinance.wpd ~-5 of the City of Salem in an easterly and northerly direction to Keagy Road (Virginia Secondary Highway 685); thence in a northerly and easterly direction with Keagy Road (Virginia Secondary Highway 685) to its intersection with Electric Road (Virginia Primary Route 419) to place of beginning. Cave Spring Magisterial District Beginning at a point where Yellow Mountain Road (Virginia Secondary Route 668) crosses the Blue Ridge Parkway; thence in a southerly direction until Yellow Mountain Road (Virginia Secondary Route 668) intersects Mayland Road (Route 667); thence in a southeasterly direction with Mayland Road (Secondary Route 667) to its intersection with Bandy Road (State Route 666); hens--- in a southerly direction with Bandy Raad (Route 666). to its intersectiomwith Crowell Gap Road (Route 657); thence in an easterly direction .with ..:Crowell Gap Road to the Roanoke/Franklin Lounty ine;~ertce irra 'a e ' ;thence with the Roanoke/Franklin County line in a southwest to northwest direction as it meanders along the crest of the Blue Ridge Mountains to a point where Dawnwood Road (State Secondary Route 691) crosses said Roanoke/Franklin County line; thence in a northerly direction with the Dawnwood Road (State Secondary Route 691) to its point of intersection with Poage Valley Road Extension (State Secondary Route 690); thence with Poage Valley Road Extension (State Secondary Route 690) in a northerly direction to its intersection with Bent Mountain Road (U. S. Highway 221); thence in a northeasterly direction with Bent Mountain Road (U.S. Highway 221) to a point where said route enters the City of Roanoke; thence with the corporate line of the City of Roanoke in a southeasterly and easterly direction until it intersects with the western side of Yellow Mountain Road (Virginia Secondary Route 668) at the place of beginning. Hollins Ma~*.isterial District Beginning at a point of intersection of the southerly right-of--way of Interstate 81 and the Roanoke/Botetourt County line; thence with the southerly right-of--way of Interstate 81 in a westerly direction to its intersection with Interstate 581; thence in a southerly direction with Interstate 58] to Woodhaven Road ..:.(Route 628); thence in a southerly direction with Woodhaven Road (Route 628) to its intersection .with Peters Creek Road (Virginia Route 117) and the corporate line of the City of Roanoke; thence in an easterly and southerly direction with the corporate line of the City of Roanoke to a point of intersection ~ U:\ WPDOCS\REDIS\redistricting.ordinance.wpd . ~ ~ rt Ewe; with Challenges Avenue (Route 460); thence ina northeasterly direction with Challenger Avenue (Route 460) to its intersection with he RoanokeBotetourt County line; thence in a northerly and westerly direction with the RoanokeBotetourt County line to the place of beginning. Vinton Magisterial District Beginning at a common point between Botetourt and Roanoke counties ap Kout 46 (Challengf ..Drive); thencein a southwester)}~directiot othe City. of lY 'th Roanoke corporate line; thence in a southeasterly direction along the said City of Roanoke's corporate line to the northern-most corner of the corporate line of the Town of Vinton; thence following the courses of the corporate line between the Town of Vinton and the City of Roanoke in a westerly and southerly direction to a point at the corner of the Town of Vinton corporate line at the Roanoke River and on the City of Roanoke corporate line; thence continuing with the City of Roanoke corporate line in a south and southwesterly direction until the said City of Roanoke corporate line intersects the western right-of--way line of Yellow Mountain Road (Virginia Secondary Route 668); thence continuing with the western right-of--way line of Yellow Mountain Road (Virginia Secondary Route 668) in a southerly direction until its intersection with Mayland Road (Virginia Secondary Route 667); thence in a southeasterly direction with Mayland Road (Virginia Secondary Route 667) until its intersection with Bandy Road (Secondary Route 666); henc is southerly direction'with Bandy Road`(Route 666: tc it: intersectiOL, witJ CraweJ Ga; Roar (Rout 657 thence in an easterly direction with Crowe): Gal Roac t0 the Roanoke/Franklin County line; thence- irra )~ 'n E'ot~xrt~ine; thence following the Roanoke/Franklin County line as it meanders in a northeasterly and northerly direction to the Roanoke/Bedford County line to the place of beginning. 3. That the outside boundaries of the thirty-one voting precincts shall be as follows: 1 BENNETT SPRINGS PRECINCT - 107 2 Beginning at a point on the Roanoke/Montgomery County line at the top of Catawba Mountain; thence 3 with the crest of Catawba Mountain in an easterly direction to the top of McAfee Knob; thence with the 4 crest of Tinker Mountain in an easterly direction to the Roanoke/Botetourt County line; thence with 5 the Roanoke/Botetourt County line in a southeasterly direction to the southerly right-of--way of U:\WPDOCS\REDIS\redistricting.ordinance.wpd 5 ~~ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 Interstate 81; thence west with Interstate 81 to its intersection with nterstat I-587 thenc Wort with Interstate L-581 tc it<_intersectior. witY Loch Haver Lake Drive (Route 5004); thence north with Loch Haven L ake Drive (Route 5004) t , Timberview Road (State Secondary Route 1404); thence in a westerly direction with Timberview Road (State Secondary Route 1404) to the City of Roanoke Water Department west property line; thence north with the City of Roanoke Water Department west property line to the topographic crest of Brushy Mountain; thence with the crest of Brushy Mountain in a southwesterly direction crossing Mason's Creek to the intersection of Catawba Valley Drive (Virginia Route 311) at its intersection with Dutch Oven Road (State Secondary Route 863); thence north with Virginia Route 311 to Plunkett Road (State Route 874); thence west with Plunkett Road (State Route 874), to a point where Mason's Creek crosses under Plunkett Road (State Route 874); thence in anorth-northwesterly direction with Mason's Creek to its intersection with Old Catawba Road (Route 864); thence south with Old Catawba Road (Route 864) to its intersection with Bradshaw Road (State Secondary Route 622); thence with Bradshaw Road (State Secondary Route 622) in a westerly direction to the Roanoke/ Montgomery County line; thence with the Roanoke/Montgomery County line in a northwesterly direction to the place of beginning. Catawba Magisterial District Roanoke Moose Lodge #284 -Voting Place BENT MOUNTAIN PRECINCT - 301 Beginning on the Roanoke/Montgomery County line at the top of Poor Mountain at the intersection of Honeysuckle Road (State Secondary Route 916); thence following the ridge line of Poor Mountain in a generally northeasterly direction to its intersection with Poor Mountain Road (Route 612);-an t; thence continuing in a generally ~q southwesterly direction with Poor Mountain Road (Route 612), down the slope of Poor Mountain to an elevation of 2800 feet; thence following the 2800 feet contour elevation of Poor and Bent Mountains in a generally southern direction to the contours point of intersection with the AEP Company high tension Roanoke-Claytor transmission line; thence easterly with the AEP Company high tension Roanoke-Claytor transmission line down the slope of Bent Mountain to the topographic elevation 2000 feet at a branch of Back Creek; thence with the topographic elevation 2000 feet in a southeasterly direction with the base of Bent Mountain to Dividing Spring Branch; thence southerly with Dividing Spring Branch as it meanders to the Roanoke/Franklin County line at Slings Gap; thence with U:\WPDOCS\REDIS\redistricting.ordinance.wpd 6 ~,5 1 the Roanoke/Franklin County line in awesterly-southwesterly direction to the Roanoke/Floyd County 2 line; thence with the Roanoke/Floyd County line westerly to the Roanoke/Floyd/Montgomery County 3 line; thence with the Roanoke/Montgomery County line in a northerly direction to the place of 4 beginning. 5 Windsor Hills Magisterial District 6 Bent Mountain Fire Station -Voting Place 7 g $~P•1~I~ ORCHARDS PRECINCT -205 9 Beginning at a point of intersection of the Roanoke/Botetourt County line 10 and Challenger Avenue (U.S: Route 460); thence in a southwesterly direction with Challenge Avenue 11 (U.S. Route 460) ~ e 12 to a point on the east corporate line of the 13 City of Roanoke; thence with the east corporate line of the City of Roanoke in anorth-northwesterly 14 direction to its intersection with Read Mountain Road (State Secondary Route 611); thence in a 15 westerly direction with Read Mountain Road (Secondary Route 611) until it intersects with the crest of 16 Read Mountain extended; thence northeasterly with the crest of Read Mountain until it intersects with 17 the Roanoke/Botetourt County line; thence southeasterly with the Roanoke/Botetourt County line to 18 the place of beginning. 19 Hollins Magisterial District 20 Bonsack ..Baptist Church -Voting Place 21 22 BONSACK PRECINCT,- 402 23 Beginning at a point on intersection-o~ the Bluf Ridge Parkway anc the Roanoke/Botetoui .Count.:.. line; 24 thence in a southwesterly direction witl the Bluc Ridge Parkway tt the topogra~ hie crest of Stewart's 25 Knob; thence with the topographic cres~ o Stewart',. Knol "iI ~ westerl; directio: t~ poir o th east 26 corporate Line of the, City. of Roanoke tl ence with the east corporate. line. of the. City. of Roanoke in a 27 north-northwesterly'direction it its intersection with Challenge Avenue (State Route 460); thence in.a 28 northeasterly direction tc the Roanoke/Botetour Count; ling thene wit: th Roanoke/Botetourt 29 County line to the place of beginning. 30 Vinton Magisterial District 31 Bonsack United Methodist Church- Voting Place 32 33 U: \ WPDOCS\REDIS\redistricting. ordinance.wpd 7 ~R- 5 1 BOTETOURT SPRINGS PRECINCT - 204 2 Beginning at the southerlyright-of--way of Interstate 81 and Deer Branch Creek; thence south with Deer 3 Branch Creek to Peters Creek Road (Virginia Route 117); thence with Peters Creek Road (Virginia 4 Route 117) in a westerly direction `- `'-- -----~ r__i_ _rr._~_:_ ~___i-_ vi jai vin r 5 g 6 ,~ e 7 g to its intersection with Wood Haven 9 Road (Virginia Secondary Route 628); thence with Wood Haven Road (State Secondary Route 628) 10 west to the west right-of--way of Interstate Route 581; thence north with the west right-of--way line of 11 Interstate Route 581 to Interstate Route 81; thence east with the southerly right-of--way of Interstate 81 12 to the place of beginning. 13 Hollins Magisterial District 14 Hollins Fire Station -Voting Place 15 16 BURLINGTON PRECINCT- 202 17 Beginning at a point at the intersection of Williamson Road (U. S. Highway 11) and Peters Creek Road 18 (Virginia Route 117); thence west with Peters Creek Road (Virginia Route 117) to its intersection with 19 Wood Haven Road (State Secondary Route 628) and the north corporate limit of the City of Roanoke; 20 thence with the north corporate limit of the City of Roanoke in an east/southeasterly direction ta-R~nnte 21 Florist Road (State Secondary Route 623); thence with Florist 22 Road (State Secondary Route 623) leaving the north corporate limit of the City of Roanoke in a 23 northerly direction to Williamson Road (U. S. Highway 11); thence north with Williamson Road (U. 24 S. Highway 11) to the place of beginning. 25 Hollins Magisterial District 26 Burlington Elementary School -Voting Place 27 28 CASTLE ROCK PRECINCT -305 29 Beginning at a point in the intersection of Electric Road (Virginia Primary Route 419) and Brambleton 30 Avenue (U. S. Highway 221); thence southwesterly with Brambleton Avenue (U. S. Highway 221) to 31 its intersection with Ran Lynn~aac Drive (Route 745); thence in a northwesterly direction with Ran 32 Lynn ~d Drive (Route 745) to its intersection with South Roselawn Road (State Route 690); thence 33 with South Roselawn Road (State Secondary Route 690) in a northeasterly direction to its intersection U:\WPDOCS\REDIS\redistricting.ordinance.wpd (~-5 1 with Roselawn Road (State Route 689); thence in a northerly direction with Roselawn Road (State 2 Route 689) to the crossing location of the AEP Company high tension Glen Lynn-Hancock Electric 3 Transmission line; thence with Appalachian Power Company high tension Glen Lyn-Hancock Electric 4 Transmission line in a northeasterly direction to its intersection with Brahma Road (State Secondary 5 Route 1687); thence northwest with Brahma Road (State Secondary Route 1687) to Longhorn Road 6 (State Secondary Route 1687 ~8); thence north with Longhorn Road (State Secondary Rout 687 7 ~6$$) to Castle Rock Road (State Secondary Route 702); thence in a westerly direction with Castle Rock 8 Road (State Secondary Route 702) to Stoneybrook Drive (State Secondary Route 1316); thence 9 north/northeasterly with Stoneybrook Drive (State Secondary Route 1316) to Electric Road (Virginia 10 Primary Route 419); thence in a southeasterly/easterly direction with Electric Road (Virginia Primary 11 Route 419) to its intersection with Brambleton Avenue (U. S. Highway 221) being the place of 12 beginning. 13 Windsor Hills Magisterial District 14 Cave Spring Junior High School ~rln -Voting Place 15 16 17 CATAWBA PRECINCT - 101 18 Beginning at the top of Brush Mountain at the Montgomery/Roanoke/Craig County line; thence with 19 the Roanoke/Craig County line in a northeasterly direction to the Roanoke/Craig/Botetourt County 20 line; thence with the Roanoke/Botetourt County line in a southerly direction to the crest of Tinker 21 Mountain; thence with the crest of Tinker Mountain in a westerly direction to the top of McAfee Knob 22 on Catawba Mountain; thence continuing in a westerly direction with the crest of Catawba Mountain 23 to the Roanoke/Montgomery County line; thence with the Roanoke/Montgomery County line in a 24 northerly direction to the place of beginning. 25 Catawba Magisterial District 26 Catawba Fire Station -Voting Place 27 28 CAVE SPRING PRECINCT - 503 29 Beginning at a point at the intersection of Brambleton Avenue (U. S. Highway 221) and Colonial 30 Avenue (State Secondary Route 720); thence east with Colonial Avenue (State Secondary Route 720) 31 to Penn Forest Boulevard (State Secondary Route 687); thence continuing east with Penn Forest 32 Boulevard (State Secondary Route 687) to Chaparral Drive (State Secondary Route 800); thence 33 southwest with Chaparral Drive (State Secondary Route 800) to Merriman Road (State Secondary U:\WPDOCS\REDIS\redistriccing.ordinance.wpd 9 ~~ 1 Route 613); thence with Merriman Road (State Secondary Route 613) southeasterly to Cartwright Drive 2 (State Secondary Route 1726); thence with Cartwright Drive (State Secondary Route 1726) in a 3 southwesterly direction to Crystal Creek Drive (State Secondary Route 897); thence with Crystal Creek 4 Drive (State Secondary Route 897) in a westerly direction to Brambleton Avenue (U. S. Highway 221); 5 thence with Brambleton Avenue (U. S. Highway 221) in a northerly direction to the place of beginning. 6 Cave Spring Magisterial District 7 Masonic LodgelCommunity Center 1-Voting Place 8 g CLEARBROOK PRECINCT - 505 10 Beginning at a point in the City of Roanoke corporate line where Franklin Road (U. S. 220) south exits 11 the City; thence with the southerly boundary of the City of Roanoke in the northeasterly direction to a 12 point where it intersects Yellow Mountain Road (Secondary Route 668); thence in a southerly direction 13 until Yellow Mountain Road (Route 668) intersects Mayland Road (Route 667); thence in a 14 southeasterly direction with Mayland Road (Secondary Route 667) until it intersects with Bandy Road 15 (Secondary Route 666); thence it ~ southerh directioi wit] Band: Roar .(Rout 66E t it intersection 16 with Crowell Gap .Road (Route 657) thence i~ ar easterly d section with Crowell Gap to the 17 Roanoke/Franklin County li.zie Y 18 ~ h 19 e 20 ;thence with the Roanoke/Franklin County line in a southwesterly to 21 northwesterly direction as it meanders along the crest of the Blue Ridge Mountains to Merriman Road 22 (State Secondary Route 613); thence northerly along Merriman Road (State Secondary Route 613) until 23 it intersects the Blue Ridge Parkway; thence in a southeasterly and northeasterly direction with the Blue 24 Ridge Parkway until it intersects Franklin Road (U. S. 220); thence northerly with Franklin Road (U. 25 S. 220) to the place of beginning. 26 Cave Spring Magisterial District 27 Clearbrook Elementary School -Voting Place 28 29 30 COTTON HII,L PRECINCT - 501 31 Beginning at a point on the western right-of--way of Brambleton Avenue (U. S. Highway 221) at its 32 intersection with Crystal Creek Drive (State Secondary Route 897); thence with Brambleton Avenue (U. 33 S. Highway 221) to Poage Valley Road Extension (State Secondary Route 690); thence south with U:\WPDOCS\REDIS\redistricting.ordinance.wpd 10 1 Poage Valley Road Extension (State Secondary Route 690) to Dawnwood Road (State Secondary Route 2 691); thence in a southerly direction with Dawnwood Road (State Secondary Route 691), if extended 3 would intersect to the Franklin/Roanoke County line; thence in an easterly direction with the crest of 4 the Blue Ridge Mountains and the Franklin/Roanoke County line to Merriman Road (State Secondary 5 Route 613) northerly direction with Merriman Road (State Secondary Route 613) through Starkey to 6 Crystal Creek Drive (State Secondary Route 897); thence with Crystal Creek Drive (State Secondary 7 Route 897) in a westerly direction to the point of beginning. 8 Cave Spring Magisterial District 9 Penn Forest Elementary School -Voting Place 10 11 12 GARST MILL PRECINCT - 306 13 Beginning at a point on Electric Road (Virginia Primary Route 419) where the west fork of Mud Lick 14 Creek crosses Electric Road (Route 419); thence with the west fork of Mud Lick Creek as it meanders 15 in a northeasterly direction to the southerly corporate line of the City of Roanoke; thence with the 16 corporate line of the City of Roanoke in a northeasterly and southeasterly direction to a point where it 17 crosses Brambleton Avenue (U. S. Highway 221); thence with Brambleton Avenue (U. S. Highway 221) 18 in a southwesterly direction to its intersection with Electric Road (Virginia Primary Route 419); thence 19 with Electric Road (Virginia Primary Route 419) in a northwesterly direction to the place of beginning. 20 Windsor Hills Magisterial District 21 Library Headquarters -Voting Place 22 23 GLENVAR PRECINCT -103 24 Beginning at a point on the Roanoke/Montgomery County line where U. S. Interstate 81 intersects that 25 line; thence with the said U. S. Interstate 81 in a northeasterly direction to its intersection with~tate 26 the western most 27 corner of the City of Salem corporate line; thence in a generally northeasterly direction with the said 28 City of Salem corporate line to a point where Dry Branch forks into an easterly and westerly fork; thence 29 with the easterly fork of the said Dry Branch as it meanders in generally a northwesterly direction to 30 where this branch or hollow intersects~iretrail-~t witl the ~El po«~e line henc followin th _AEP 31 power line in an easterly. direction tc intersection witl Catawb< Valley Drive.{Route 31;1); thence in a 32 northerly. direction with Catawba Valley Drivf (Route 311 tc_ it intersection .with the topographic crest 33 of Fort Lewis Mountain, ;thence U:\WPDOCS\REDIS\redistricting.ordinance.wpd 11 1 west with the Copographic' crest of For Lewi; Mountau tc; it intersection witl Fore: Ac,~r Tra (Route 2 700); thence with Forest: Acre Trai_ (Route 700 back to the topographic crest of Fort Lewis Mountain; 3 thence .with the... topographic crest _ _o: For Lewi; Mountau tc it inter ection with tlae 4 Roanoke/Montgomery;Count~ lire; thence with the Roanoke/Montgomery County line to the point 5 of beginning. 6 Catawba Magisterial District 7 Glenvar Elementary School -Voting Place 8 9 10 GREEN HILL PRECINCT - 106 11 Beginning at a point on U.S. Interstate 81 at its intersectio d 12 narth-~af with the City of Salem corporate limits; f 13 S~.tlem; thence with the west corporate line of the City of Salem in a southerly direction and with the 14 south corporate line of the City of Salem in an easterly and southerly direction to its intersection with 15 Twelve O'Clock Knob Road (Route 694); thence with Twelve O'Clock Knob Road (Route 694) in a 16 southerly direction to a point where it intersects with a gas transmission line at the crest of 12 Twelve 17 O'Clock Knob {~evRi~+~n-26$3-); thence with the crest of 12 Twelve O'Clock Knob and with the crest of 18 Poor Mountain, the dividing line between Catawba and the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, in a 19 westerly and southwesterly direction to the intersection of Poor Mountain Road (State Secondary Route 20 612); thence following the crest of Poor Mountain in a generally southwesterly direction to its 21 intersection with Honeysuckle Road (State Secondary Route 916) on the Montgomery/Roanoke County 22 line; thence with the Montgomery/Roanoke County line in a northerly direction to U.S. Interstate 81; 23 thence in a northeasterly direction with U.S. Interstate 81 to the point of beginning. 24 Catawba Magisterial District 25 „,__~ T ___.._ T.__ ~~..~_~ Fort Lewis Baptist Church -Voting Place 26 27 28 HOLLINS PRECINCT - 206 29 Beginning at the southerlyright-of--way of Interstate 81 and the Roanoke/Botetourt County Line; thence 30 with the southerly right-of--way of Interstate 81 in a westerly direction to Deer Branch Creek; thence 31 south with Deer Branch Creek as it meanders to Peters Creek Road (Virginia Route 117); thence easterly 32 with Peters Creek Road (Virginia Route 117) to its intersection with Williamson Road (Route 11); 33 thence in a southeasterly direction with Williamson Road (Route 11) to its intersection with Clubhouse U: \WPDOCS\REDIS\redistricting.ordinance.wpd 12 1 Drive (State Secondary Route 1821); thence in a southeasterly direction with Clubhouse Drive (State 2 Secondary Route 1821) extended until it intersects the east fork of Carvins Creek; thence northeasterly 3 with Carvins Creek as it meanders until it intersections Plantation Road (Virginia Primary Route 115); 4 thence in a northwesterly direction with Plantation Road (Virginia Primary Route 115) until it intersects 5 Williamson Road (Route 11) until it intersects the Roanoke/Botetourt County line; thence with the 6 Roanoke/Botetourt County line in a northwesterly direction to the place of beginning. 7 Hollins Magisterial District 8 Hollins Library -Voting Place 9 10 HUNTING HII.,LS PRECINCT - 507 11 Beginning at a point where Electric Road (U.S. Route 419) intersects the corporate line of the City of 12 Roanoke; thence in a southeasterly direction with the corporate line of the City of Roanoke and partially 13 with Franklin Road (Route 220) to a point where the said Franklin Road (Route 220) intersects the Blue 14 Ridge Parkway; thence with the Blue Ridge Parkway in a southwesterly and then northwesterly 15 direction to its intersection with Merriman Road (Route 613); thence in a northerly direction with 16 Merriman Road (State Secondary Route 613) to Starkey Road (Secondary Route 904); thence in an 17 easterly and northerly direction with Starkey Road (State Secondary Route 904) to its intersection with 18 Electric Road (State Primary Route 419); thence in a northeasterly direction with Electric Road (State 19 Primary Route 419) to the place of beginning. 20 Cave Spring Magisterial District 21 Penn Forest Church of God -Voting Place 22 23 24 LINDENWOOD PRECINCT - 405 25 Beginning at a point of intersection of the east corporate limit of the City of Roanoke and the 26 topographic crest of Stewart's Knob; thence in a easterly direction with the topographic crest of Stewart's 27 Knob to the Blue Ridge Parkway; thence in a northeasterly direction with the Blue Ridge Parkway to 28 the Botetourt/Roanoke County Line; thence south with the Botetourt/Roanoke County line to its 29 intersection with the Botetourt/Bedford/Roanoke County line; thence with the Bedford/Roanoke 30 County line in a southerly direction to the Roanoke River; thence west with the Roanoke River to Wolf 31 Creek at the east corporate limit of the Town of Vinton; thence north with Wolf Creek and the east 32 corporate limit of the Town of Vintor tc ~ pain when Wol Creel exist from the east corporat limit 33 of the Town of Vinton; thence northeasterly with Wolf Creek to its intersection with an imaginary line U:\WPDOCS\REDIS\redistricting.ordinance.wpd 13 ~`~, 1 extending from the end of Ivy Lane (Routf 1023). thence witl vy Lane to _its intersection with 2 Sunflower, Drive (Route ..1019); thence with .:Sunflower .Drive (Route .1019) to `its intersection with 3 Mountain View `.Road (Route 651); thence in a westerly direction with Mountain View .Road (Route 4 651) until ''its intersection witr the easy corporate.. limit of the Town of Vinton; thence with the east 5 corporate limit of the Town of Vinton to the place of beginning. 6 Vinton Magisterial District 7 William Byrd High School -Voting Place 8 9 MASON VALLEY PRECINCT - 102 10 Beginning at a point on the Roanoke/Montgomery County line at its intersection with Bradshaw Road 11 (Route 622); thence in an easterly direction with Bradshaw Road (Route 622) to its intersection with Old 12 Catawba Road (Route 864); thence north with Old Catawba Road (Route 864) to its intersection with 13 Mason's Creek; thence with Mason's Creek in a southerly direction to its intersection with Plunkett Road 14 (Route 874); thence in an easterly direction with Plunkett Road (Route 874) to its intersection with 15 Catawba Valley Road (Virginia Route 311); thence in a southerly direction with Catawba Valley Road 16 (Virginia Route 311) to the topographic crest of Fort Lewis Mountain; thence leaving Road 17 (Virginia Route 311) with the topographic crest of Fort Lewis Mountain to its intersection with Forest 18 Acre Trail (Route 700); thence with Forest Acre Trail (Route 70p), back to its intersection with the 19 topographic crest of Fort Lewis Mountain; thence with topographic Gres c FoI Lewi Mountai i in a 20 westerly direction to the Roanoke/Montgomery County line; thence with the Roanoke/Montgomery 21 County line in a northwesterly direction to the place of beginning. 22 Catawba Magisterial District 23 Mason Cove Elementary School -Voting Place 24 25 MOUNTAIN VIEW PRECINCT - 203 26 Beginning at a point on the Roanoke/Botetourt County line at its intersection with Williamson Road 27 (U. S. Primary Route 11); thence in a westerly direction with Williamson Road (U. S. Primary Route 28 11) to its intersection with Plantation Road (Virginia Primary Route 115); thence in a southerly direction 29 with Plantation Road (Virginia Primary Route 115) to a point where it intersects with the north 30 corporate line of the City of Roanoke; thence northeasterly with the corporate line of the City of 31 Roanoke as it meanders until it intersects with Read Mountain Road (Secondary Route 611); thence in 32 an easterly direction with Read Mountain Road (Secondary Route 611) until it intersects with the crest 33 of Read Mountain Extended; thence northeasterly with the crest of Read Mountain until it intersects U: \ WPDOCS\REDIS\redistricting. ordinance.wpd 14 L~ - ~. 1 with the Roanoke/Botetourt County line; thence northwesterly with the said Roanoke/Botetourt 2 County line to the place of beginning. 3 Hollins Magisterial District 4 Mountain View Elementary School -Voting Place 5 6 7 MOUNT PLEASANT PRECINCT - 406 8 Beginning at the west corporate line of the Town of Vinton and the east corporate line of the City of 9 Roanoke at the Roanoke River; thence with the Roanoke River in a southwesterly direction to the 10 Roanoke/Bedford County line; thence in a southerly direction with the Roanoke River/Roanoke 11 County/Bedford County line to the Roanoke/Franklin/Bedford County line; thence in a southerly 12 direction with the Roanoke/Franklin County line - s to 13 Crowell Gap Road (State Route .657) ); thence in a 14 northwesterly direction with Crowell Gap Road (State Secondary Routf -b5 767) to its intersection with 15 Bandy Road (Route 666); thence continuing with Bandy Road (Route 666) in .northerly 16 direction until it intersects with Mayland Road (State Route 667); thence in a northwesterly direction 17 with Crowell Gap Road (State Route 657-66~) until it intersects Yellow Mountain Road (State Route 18 668); thence in a northerly direction with Yellow Mountain Road (State Route 668) until it intersects 19 with the southern corporate line of the City of Roanoke; thence with the southern corporate line of the 20 City of Roanoke in a northeasterly direction to the place of beginning. 21 Vinton Magisterial District 22 Mount Pleasant Elementary School -Voting Place 23 24 25 MOUNT VERNON PRECINCT -506 26 Beginning at a point on Colonial Avenue (State Secondary Route 720) and the south corporate limit of 27 the City of Roanoke; thence with Colonial Avenue (State Secondary Route 720) in a southwesterly 28 direction to Brambleton Avenue (U. S. Highway 221); thence in a northeasterly direction with 29 Brambleton Avenue (Route 221) to the south corporate limit of the City of Roanoke; thence with the 30 south corporate limit of the City of Roanoke in a southeasterly direction to the place of beginning. 31 Cave Spring Magisterial District 32 Brambleton Center -Voting Place 33 U:\WPDOCS\REDIS\redistricting.ordinance.wpd 15 =~ 1 NORTHSIDE PRECINCT - 104 2 Beginning at a point at the intersection of~ntei~txte~i Peter: Lreel R< i ~ (Pout 11 i) and Wood 3 Haven Road (State Secondary Route 628); thence in a northwesterly direction with Wood Haven Road 4 (State Secondary Route 628) to its intersection with Green Ridge Road (Route 629); thence in a 5 southerly direction with Green Ridge Road (Route 629)to its intersection with Twilight Road (Route 6 1577); thence in an easterly direction with Twilight Road (Route 1577) to its intersection with North 7 Lake Drive (Route 1524); thence in a southeasterly direction with North Lake Drive (Route 1524) to 8 its intersection with Peters Creek Road (Virginia Route 117); them eas witl Peter ree: Roa (Route 9 117); ~ Y 10 s 11 e 12 ~ n 13 to the place of beginning. 14 Catawba Magisterial District 15 Northside High School -Voting Place 16 17 NORTH VINTON PRECINCT - 403 18 Beginning at the east corporate line of the City of Roanoke and the west corporate line of the Town of 19 Vinton at Virginia Avenue; thence with the corporate line of the Town of Vinton in a northeasterly and 20 easterly direction to it` intersection with Mountain View Road ,(Route 651); thence in an easterly 21 direction til its intersection witl: Sunflower Drive Route 1019); thence with Sunflower Drive (Route 22 1019) in a southerly direction tc it `intersectiar witl Ivy Lan. (Rout ::1023; thene followin Iv Lane 23 (Route 1023)... along an imaginary line tc Wolf Creek; thence with Wolf Creek t~ th ' ear corporat line 24 of the Town of Vinton: and ~ ith east corporate line of the Town of Vinton in a southerly direction to 25 Washington Avenue; thence with Washington Avenue in a westerly direction to South Pollard Street; 26 thence with South Pollard Street in a southerly direction to Virginia Avenue at First Street; thence with 27 Virginia Avenue in a westerly direction to the place of beginning. 28 Vinton Magisterial District 29 Vinton Baptist Church T__ -Voting Place 30 31 32 OAK GROVE PRECINCT - 304 33 Beginning at a point on the east side of Electric Road (Virginia Primary Route 419) and on the north U:\WPDOCS\REDIS\redistricting.ordinance.wpd 16 -~ 1 side of Keagy Road (Virginia Secondary Highway 685) being a point on the City of Salem/City of 2 Roanoke/Roanoke County boundary; thence with the west corporate line of the City of Roanoke and 3 the east side of Electric Road (Virginia Primary Route 419) in asouth-southeasterly direction to the 4 intersection with Stoneybrook Drive (State Secondary Route 1316); thence in a southwesterly direction 5 with Stoneybrook Drive (State Secondary Route 1316) to Castle Rock Road (State Secondary Route 6 702); thence in an easterly direction with Castle Rock Road (State Secondary Route 702) to Longhorn 7 Road (State Secondary Route 1688); thence south with Longhorn Road (State Secondary Route~fr88 8 1687) to Brahma Road (State Secondary Route~6$= 1689); thence southeast with Brahma Road (State 9 Secondary Route ~fi$-"r 1689) to the crossing of the AEP Company high tension Glen Lyn-Hancock 10 electric transmission line; thence with the AEP Company high tension Glen Lyn-Hancock electric 11 transmission line in a southwesterly direction to Roselawn Road (State Secondary Route 689); thence 12 northwest with Roselawn Road (State Secondary Route 689) to Mount Chestnut Road (State Secondary 13 Route 692); thence west with Mount Chestnut Road (State Secondary Route 692) to the crossing 14 location of a gas pipeline; thence with this gas pipeline in a northerly and then westerly direction to its 15 intersection with the crest of 12 O'Clock Knolr{eleva~iair26~3) at Twelve O'Clock Knob Road (Route 16 694); thence with Twelve O'Clock Knob Road (Route 694) in a northerly direction to the corporate line 17 of the Ciry of Salem; thence with the corporate line of the City of Salem in an easterly direction to the 18 place of beginning. 19 Windsor Hills Magisterial District 20 Oak Grove Elementary School -Voting Place 21 22 23 OGDEN PRECINCT - 504 24 Beginning at a point on Colonial Avenue (State Secondary Route 720) and the south corporate limit of 25 the City of Roanoke; thence with Colonial Avenue (State Secondary Route 720) in a southwesterly 26 direction to Penn Forest Boulevard (State Secondary Route 687); thence east with Penn Forest 27 Boulevard (State Secondary Route 687) to Starkey Road (State Secondary Route 904); thence northeast 28 with Starkey Road (State Secondary Route 904) to Electric Road (Virginia Route 419); thence northeast 29 with Electric Road (Virginia Route 419) to the south corporate limit of the City of Roanoke; thence 30 north and westerly with the south corporate limit of the City of Roanoke to the place of beginning. 31 Cave Spring Magisterial District 32 Green Valley Elementary School -Voting Place 33 U:\WPDOCS\REDIS\redistricting.ordinance.wpd 17 ~~ 1 PENN FOREST PRECINCT - 502 2 Beginning at a point at the intersection of Penn Forest Boulevard (State Secondary Route 687) and 3 Chaparral Drive (State Secondary Route 800); thence with Chaparral Drive (State Secondary Route 800) 4 in a southwesterly direction to Merriman Road (State Secondary Route 613); thence southeasterly with 5 Merriman Road (State Secondary Route 613) to Cartwright Drive (State Secondary Route 1525); thence 6 in a southwesterly direction with Cartwright Drive (State Secondary Route 1525) to Crystal Creek Drive 7 (State Secondary Route 897); thence east with Crystal Creek Drive (State Secondary Route 897) to 8 Merriman Road (State Secondary Route 613); thence with Merriman Road (State Secondary Route 613) 9 in a southeasterly direction to Starkey Road (State Secondary Route 904); thence east and north with 10 Starkey Road (State Secondary Route 904) to Penn Forest Boulevard (State Secondary Route 687); 11 thence with Penn Forest Boulevard (State Route 687) in a westerly direction to the place of beginning. 12 Cave Spring Magisterial District 13 Cave Spring High School -Voting Place 14 15 16 PETERS CREEK PRECINCT - 105 17 Beginning at a point on Wood Haven Road (Route 628) where the said Wood Haven Road (Route 628) 18 crosses the western right-of--way line of U.S. Route 581; thence north with the west right-of--way line of 19 Interstate 581 crossing Interstate Route 81 20 Dri~ej to ~h~e its intersection o 21 witk LocY Haver Lakf Drivf (Routs 5004) thence northerl wit' Loch 22 Haven Lake Drive' (Route 5004; tc it: intersection witl Timberview .Road (Route 1404); to-~te 23 ,thence in a westerly direction with State Secondary Route 1404 to the City of 24 Roanoke Water Department west property line; thence north with the City of Roanoke Water 25 Department west property line to the topographic crest of Brushy Mountain; thence with the 26 topographic crest of Brushy Mountain in a southwesterly direction crossing Mason Creek to the 27 intersection of Catawba Valley Road (Virginia Route 311 ;-end Dutch Oven Road (State Secondary 28 Route 6$3 863), and the AEF power Iine; t 29 's 30 1- hens v westerl directio wit the 31 AEP power line to its intersection~rrterseetirrl with 'the east fork of Dry Branch ~rrrd 32 ' ;thence with the hollow which is the east fork of Dry Branch in a southerly direction 33 as it meanders to a point where Dry Branch divides into an east and west fork at the north corporate line U:\WPDOCS\REDIS\redistricting.ordinance.wpd 18 l2-5 1 of the City of Salem; thence with the north corporate line of the City of Salem and in a generally 2 northeasterly direction to its intersection with Electric Road (State Route 419); thence with the east 3 corporate line of the City of Salem in asouth-northeasterly direction to a point on the City of Salem, 4 Roanoke County, and City of Roanoke line at Green Ridge Roac (Rout 629); thence in a -sattth 5 northeasterly direction with Green Ridge Road (Route 629) to its intersection with Cove Roa {Route 6 780); thence in an easterly direction with Cove Road ~ Routs 7801 to its intersection with Peters Creek 7 Road: (Route ....117): thence in a northeasterly direction with Peters Creek Road (Rout 11; i to its 8 intersection with North Lake Drive (Routf 1524); thence in a northwesterly direction with North Lake 9 Drive (Route 1524) to its intersection with Twilight Roac (Route 1577); thence in a westerly direction 10 with Twilight Road (Route 1577) to its intersection with Green Ridge Roar (Route. 629); thence north 11 with Green Ridge Road (Route 629; to its intersection with Wood Haven Roar {Rout 628); thence east 12 with Wood Haven Road (Route 628) to the place of beginning. 13 Catawba Magisterial District 14 Glen Cove Elementary School -Voting Place 15 16 PLANTATION PRECINCT - 201 17 Beginning at a point where Williamson Road (Route 11) intersects Clubhouse Drive (Route 1821); 18 thence southeasterly with Williamson Road (Route 11) until it intersects Florist Road (Secondary Route 19 623); thence in a southeasterly direction with Florist Road (Secondary Route 623) until it intersects the 20 north corporate line of the City of Roanoke; thence in an easterly direction with the north corporate line 21 of the City of Roanoke until it intersects Plantation Road (Virginia Primary Route 115); thence in a 22 northwesterly direction with Plantation Road (Virginia Primary Route 115) to a point where the said 23 road intersects the east fork of Carvins Creek; thence with the east fork of Carvins Creek in a 24 southwesterly direction as it meanders to a point opposite the center line extended of Clubhouse Drive 25 (Secondary Route 1821); thence northwesterly with the center line of Clubhouse Drive (Secondary 26 Route 1821) to its intersection with Williamson Road (U. S. Route 11) the place of beginning. 27 Hollins Magisterial District 28 Roanoke Valley Christian Schools -Voting Place 29 30 POAGES MII,L PRECINCT - 302 31 Beginning at a point on the western right-of--way of Brambleton Avenue (U. S. Highway 221) and its 32 intersection with Ran Lynn Drive (Route 745); thence in a northwesterly direction with Ran Lynn Drive 33 (Route 745) to its intersection with South Roselawn Road (State Route 690); thence with South U:\WPDOCS\REDIS\redistricting.ordinance.wpd 19 r' µ-~ 1 Roselawn Road (State Secondary Route 690) in a northeasterly direction to its intersection with 2 Roselawn Road (State Route 689); thence in a northerly direction with Roselawn Road (State Route 3 689) to Mount Chestnut Drive (State Secondary Route 692); thence west with Mount Chestnut Drive 4 (State Secondary Route 692) to the crossing location of a gas pipeline; thence with this gas pipeline in 5 a northerly then westerly direction to its intersection with the crest of Twelve O'Clock Knob-~~evatian 6 26$3j; thence with the topographic crest of Twelve O'Clock Knob and Poor Mountain in a westerly- ? southwesterly direction to Poor Mountain Road (State Secondary Route 612); thence in a generally 8 southeRSt~rly+ westerly directior witl- Poop Mountau Roac (Roue 612) ~ireetion down the slope of 9 Poor Mountain to an elevation of 2800 feet; thence following the 2800-foot contour elevation of Poor 10 and Bent Mountains in a generally southern direction to the contours point of intersection with AEP 11 Company high-tension Roanoke-Claytor transmission line; thence easterly with the AEP Company high 12 tension Roanoke-Claytor transmission line down the slope of Bent Mountain to the topographic 13 elevation 2,000 feet at a branch of Back Creek; thence with the topographic elevation 2,000 feet as it 14 traverses in a southeasterly direction with the base of Bent Mountain to Dividing Spring Branch; thence 15 southerly with Dividing Spring Branch as it meanders to the Roanoke/Franklin County line; thence 16 with the Roanoke/Franklin County line easterly to its intersection with Dawnwood Road (State 17 Secondary Route 691); thence in a northerly direction with Dawnwood Road (State Secondary Route 18 691) to its intersection with Poage Valley Road Extension (State Secondary Route 690); thence in a 19 northerly direction with Poage Valley Road Extension (State Secondary Route 690) to the intersection 20 of U.S. Highway 221; thence with U. S. Highway 221 to the place of beginning. 21 Windsor Hills Magisterial District 22 Back Creek Elementary School -Voting Place 23 24 25 SOUTH VINTON PRECINCT - 404 26 Beginning at the east corporate line of the City of Roanoke and the west corporate line of the Town of 27 Vinton at Virginia Avenue; thence with Virginia Avenue in an easterly direction to Pollard Street at First 28 Street; thence with :South Pollard Street in a northerly direction to Washington Avenue; thence with 29 Washington Avenue in an easterly direction to Wolf Creek being the east corporate line of the Town 30 of Vinton; thence with Wolf Creek and the east corporate line of the Town of Vinton in a southerly 31 direction to the Roanoke River; thence in a westerly direction with the Roanoke River and the south 32 corporate line of the Town of Vinton to Tinker Creek being the east corporate line of the City of 33 Roanoke and the west corporate line of the Town of Vinton; thence with Tinker Creek in a U:\WPDOCS\REDIS\redistricting.ordinance.wpd 20 v 1 northwesterly direction to the place of beginning. 2 Vinton Magisterial District 3 `'__ `_ . `_'_-~~_-~ ~-`-T~ __ `_'_~`. Charles R. I-lill Senior Center -Voting Place 4 5 WIlVDSOR HII,LS PRECINCT - 303 6 Beginning at the City of Roanoke corporate line where Electric Road (Virginia Primary Route 419) 7 intersects Glen Heather Drive (Routf 713); thence easterly then southerly with the corporate line of the 8 City of Roanoke to a point where the said corporate line intersects Mud Lick Creek; thence with the 9 west fork of Mud Lick Creek as it meanders in a southwesterly direction to Electric Road (Virginia 10 Primary Route 419); thence north with Electric Road (Virginia Primary Route 419); to the place of 11 beginning. 12 Windsor Hills Magisterial District 13 Our Lady of Nazareth Catholic Church -Voting Place 14 15 16 e 17 , 18 , 19 g 20 s 21 's 22 y 23 ; 24 e 25 26 27 28 4. That certified copies of this ordinance shall be mailed by the Clerk to the local electoral 29 board, the Secretary of the Commonwealth, the State Board of Elections, and the Division of Legislative 30 Services. 31 5. That this ordinance shall be effective from and after the date of its adoption. 32 33 U:\WPDOCS\REDIS\redistricting.ordinance.wpd 21 ,~ o~ RoaNOk~ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~. Z o :Z v -.a ,838 APPEARANCE REQUEST ~~PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~ ~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: -~a ~ P.s C~ Y Y ~ s ADDRESS: `314Ft ~ ~1-?~Lre•.~~acoc~ L PHONE: ~ `1~ - 7 sus ~ of POANO,Y~` ~ ~~ ~ z ~ a z v a AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ ~ z ,83a APPEARANCE REQUEST ~~ PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~L--e' ~ s~~ ~ z~ i~,,~~*~~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group sha11 file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~ L~ L ~~ ~. ~~ ~-''.:,~ ADDRESS: ~-~ l l ~ ~ ri, r~. ~ ( ~~ r ~ ~t'ni ~~~ n. ~~~a PHONE: ~ 7 ~1 " ~- `~% ~,~La 4 O~ POANO,Y~` ti ~~ ~ z ~ ~ .z v ,, ,a 1838 AGENDA ITEM NO. S APPEARANCE REQI,rIES'T_ _ ..____~, PUBLIC HEARING SUBJECT: //_.. /~ORDINANC CITIZEN COMMENTS /~ r. - -.~_____.~__._- I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW-- ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD ~ ~ NAME: ji ~ _ G-~ ~a-.~ ADDRESS: 7S s ~~. PHONE: ~~~ -~D.S~j~ o~ RoANO,~F AGENDA ITEM NO. S~ .« Z o .Z v ^`a 1838 APPEARANCE REQUEST -- ~,. .- PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W/LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. /AGREE TO AB/DE BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given between three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking on an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ADDRE _. PHONE: ~I~~' o~ PoANO~F ~ AGENDA ITEM NO. ~ ~ (' -~ S ~* Z ° z ~ ~, .a APP RANCE REQUEST /~ 1838 PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CI~ZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT:~,c~~lo`(~e ~_~vn~~ c.~~~ S I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervis s to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may com nt. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, / W LL G/VE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. /AGREE TO AB/ E BY THE GU/DEL/NES L/STED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given betwe n three to five minutes to comment whether speaking as an individual or representativ .The Chairman will decide the time limit based on the number of citizens speaking o an issue, and will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limite to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be ent ained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience memb rs is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the Group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: 111 ADDRESS: PHONE: ROANOKE COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE Roanoke County Administration Center 5204 Bernard Drive, S. W. -Room 431 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Phone 772-2007 -FAX 772-2089 MEMORANDUM To: Chairman and Members Board of Supervisors From: Paul M. Mahoney Date: 26 June 2001 Subject: Evangel Foursquare Church Special Use Permit -Religious Assembly and Day Care Center Item R-1 on the Board's agenda for June 26, 2001 is a request by The Evangel Foursquare Church Trustees for a special use permit for the construction of a new religious assembly facility and a special use permit for a day care center on a 48-acre parcel of real estate located on Indian Grave Road. On July 25, 2000, the Board of Supervisor's adopted Ordinance 072500-10 which granted a special use permit to the Evangel Foursquare Trustees to construct a facility for religious assembly and a day care center on this property. This ordinance approved these special use permits with seven conditions. It appears that these applications are an attempt to avoid or repeal these conditions. I anticipate that this applicant will file a challenge in federal court against the County under recent federal legislation (see discussion below) if the Board continues to require the Church to undertake the transportation and road improvements along Indian Grave Road and Route 220. In an attempt to assist the Board in defending against this litigation, I recommend that the Board may want to amend one of the conditions in the special use permits's ordinance as follows: (5) The church shall undertake all transportation and road improvements along Indian Grave Road between Route 220 and the entrance to the church and at the intersection of Indian Grave Road and Route 220 as required bvVDOT,generated by the increased traffic from the church and day care developments, :and deemed necessary to insure that adequate and safe access to the site is provided. From earlier discussions with representatives of the applicant it appears that the condition which requires the church to undertake certain transportation and road improvements along Indian Grave Road and to install a traffic signal at the intersection of State Route 220 and Indian Grave Road is the condition which the church would most like to avoid. In late September 2000 and after the adoption of this ordinance, President Clinton signed into law the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA). It appears that the current application of this church is an attempt to circumvent the conditions attached to the July 25, 2000, special use permits and to bring it within the provisions of the RLUIPA. If the church is unable to avoid or eliminate these conditions, then it may challenge this zoning action in federal court. Under the RLUIPA, "no government shall impose or implement a land use regulation in a manner that imposes a substantial burden on the religious exercise of a person," unless the government can show that the burden is in furtherance of a compelling government interest and is the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling government interest. Governments are prohibited from imposing a discriminatory land use regulation or one that "treats a religious assembly or institution on less than equal terms" with anon-religious entity. Depending upon how the federal courts interpret this legislation, this law could establish a federalized land use standard solely applicable to religious institutions, rendering locally approved land use plans and zoning decisions null and void in the context of religious facilities. If such institutions are granted special status under this law then they would not be held to the same, uniform standards applicable to everyone else, and which are designed to protect the public health and safety. Senator Orin Hatch (R-Utah) a co-sponsor of this legislation stated that this legislation does not provide a religious assembly with immunity from zoning regulation. "If the religious claimant can not demonstrate that the regulation places a substantial burden on sincere religious exercise" he said, "then the claim fails without further consideration." He stated that if the religious claimant can demonstrate a substantial burden, then the government must provide a strong justification for the regulation under the law's standards. Senator Kennedy (D-Mass.) the other co-sponsor clarified that the law does not extend to the ability of states and local governments to enforce fire and building codes, and similar measures as they apply to child care centers, schools, or camps run by religious organizations. Assuming that the church objects to any or all of the conditions recommended by staff or the conditions included in Ordinance 072500-10, and as a basis for its objections, cites RLUIPA, then the church has the burden of proving that the County's land use regulation imposes a substantial burden on its religious exercise. I would argue that the financial cost ofimproving astate-maintained road that meets minimum state standards in order to handle the substantially increased traffic that will be generated by the church's use of this property does not constitute a "substantial burden on the religious exercise of a person." However, let us assume that a federal court might find that such a condition does constitute a "substantial burden on the religious exercise of a person." Then the burden would shift to the County to show (1) a compelling government interest in this land use regulation, and (2) that this is the least restrictive means of furthering or accomplishing this interest. I would argue that the compelling government interest is public health and safety. The Board is well aware of the previous discussions and issues arising from this church's applications last year. The staff report identifies the significant public safety concerns as a result of the substantial increase in traffic generation arising from these two uses (the religious assembly use and the day care center 2 use). Both the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) and County staff have identified such problems and concerns as: inadequate site distance, increased traffic generation, the limited nature of the 16-foot wide state road (Indian Grave Road), stacking of vehicles on Indian Grave Road which may increase response time of emergency vehicles from the Clearbrook Public Safety Building, and the lack of traffic signal at the intersection of Franklin Road (U. S. Route 220) and Indian Grave Road. The County has significant safety concerns related to the increase of vehicular traffic on Indian Grave Road and the intersection with Franklin Road, especially at peak travel times. These concerns become paramount when considering the traffic generated by the day care center. This traffic will be at peak times and the danger posed to the children is obvious. However, assuming that the County can show that there is a compelling interest based upon public safety, is the imposition of conditions addressing transportation and road improvements the least restrictive means of furthering or accomplishing this government interest? VDOT has recommended that these improvements are deemed necessary to insure adequate and safe access to the site. It is necessary to improve Indian Grave Road to a design standard sufficient to accommodate the increased traffic generated by the church's proposes uses. These recommendations by the VDOT professionals are not designed to discriminate against the religious exercise by any person rather they are designed to address adequate and safe access to the site. Further, a traffic signal should be installed at the intersection of Franklin Road and Indian Grave Road. The health and safety of the children using the day care facility demands no less. Making a left turn from Indian Grave Road onto Franklin Road, a 4-lane divided highway with a grass median identified as an "urban arterial road" by VDOT standards at peak times, i.e. rush hour, in a minivan with 2 or 3 children is a recipe for disaster. Finally, I would question whether or not a day care center should be judged under the same standard, under RLUIPA, as a religious institution. Finally, governments are prohibited from imposing a discriminatory land use regulation, or one that "treats a religious assembly or institution on less than equal terms" with anon-religious entity. Based upon Roanoke County's past history, the imposition of these kinds of conditions do not treat religious assembly or institutions "on less than equal terms" than other non-religious uses. The County would impose these kinds of conditions on any other similar use that created these kinds of traffic impacts and safety concerns in this setting. In conclusion, it is my recommendation to the Board that it review the applications for special use permits by the Trustees for Evangel Foursquare Church not only with the requirements of the planning and zoning law of Commonwealth of Virginia (which I know you always do) but also pursuant to the provisions of the RLUIPA. To repeat the essential elements of this federal legislation: (1) Is the County imposing a substantial burden on the religious exercise of a person? (2) If there is a substantial burden, is this burden in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest? (3) Is this the least restrictive means of furthering that governmental interest? (4) Is the County treating a religious assembly or institution on less than equal terms with a non-religious entity? 3 Although RLUIPA has only been in effect for several months, many lawsuits have akeady been filed across the country. It is my recommendation that you should be careful, yet flexible. The County should have a good solid defensible record upon which to base its land use decisions in order to respond appropriately to claims of discrimination against religious institutions. The County should reasonably accommodate the inherent special needs of religious institutions; however, religious institutions must apply for special use permits, rezonings or variances like any other property owner. If I can provide you with any further information about this federal legislation or how it applies to your actions, please do not hesitate to contact me. PMM/spb cc: Elmer C. Hodge U:\WPDOCS\ZONING\4squaze.sup.memo.bos.wpd 4 O~ ROANp,I.~ L ti ' r, ~ z ~ ,.~z C~~~~~ .~~ ~a~x~~.~.~ 1838 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE MARY H. ALLEN, CMC ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 2401 8-0798 BRENDA J. HOLTON CLERK TO THE BOARD (540) 772-2005 DEPUTY CLERK Internet E-Mail: mallen@www.co.roanoke.va.us FAX (540) 772-2193 Internet E-Mail: bholton@www.co.roanoke.va.us 1 C,~~ v August 3, 2001 Mr. R. J. Austin Special Projects Manager Commonwealth of Virginia Division of Legislative Services 910 Capital Street, 2"d Floor Richmond, VA 23219 Dear Mr. Austin: Thank you for your letter of July 27, 2001, advising that you received Roanoke County's redistricting ordinance, requesting a copy of the map, and asking about preclearance under the Voting Rights Act. In a separate mailing, I am sending you copies of the map prepared by our Community Development Department. I am enclosing a copy of the Consent Judgement and Decree which was filed January 24, 2001, from the U. S. District Court for the District of Columbia granting Roanoke County an exemption from certain provisions of the Voting Rights Act, and in particular, the preclearance requirements for certain voting changes. If I can be of further assistance, please let me know. Sincerely, Brenda J. Holton, CMC Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Enclosure cc: Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Diane St. John, Registrar ® Recycled Paper ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: March 27, 2001 AGENDA ITEM: CONSENT JUDGMENT AND DECREE GRANTING ROANOKE COUNTY'S REQUEST FOR EXEMPTION FROM COVERAGE PURSUANT TO SECTION 4(b) OF THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT, 42 U.S.C. § 1973b(b) COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: / / /~ ~~~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Attached you will find a copy of the Consent Judment and Decree from the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia granting Roanoke County an exemption from certain provisions of the Voting Rights Act, and in particular, the preclearance requirements for certain voting changes. Respectfully submitted, P~ m . ~. Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Vote No Yes Abs Approved () Motion by Church Denied () Johnson Received () McNamara Referred Minnix to Nickens G:\ATTORNEY\PMM\AGENDA\bailout.consent decree.fr~ s • IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, Plaintiff, v. JANET RENO, Attorney General of the United States of Arneri.c~ BILL LANN LEE, Assistant Attorney General, Civil Rights Division, Defendants ) 1 C.A. No. 1:OOCV0194G ) (RMU, SST ~ JP, ) (three-judge court) 1 N-7 ~~~~~ J~fV 2 4 2001 ~daNCYf~AY~F WH1T71NGTON, CL~Rl~ CONSENT JUDGMENT AND DECREE ~.S.QISTRICTC0~IRT This action was initiated by Roanoke County, a politica subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia (hereafter "the County"). The County is subject to t~~:e provisions of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, as amended. 42 U.S.C. ~ 1973c. The County seeks a declaratory judgment under Section 9 of the Voting Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. ~ 1973b. A three-judge Court has been convened as provided in 92 U.S.C. ~ 1973b(a)(5) and 28 U.S.C. § 2284. Section 4(a) of the Voting Rights Act provides that a S tate or political subdivision subject to the special provisions of t he Act may be exempted from those provisions if it can demonstrate in an action for a declaratory judgment before the United States D istrict Court for the District of Columbia that it has both (1) comp lied with the Voting Rights Act during the ten-year period prior to filing the ~~1 s • n-~ action; and (2) taken positive steps both to encourage minority political participation and to remove structural barriers to minority electoral influence. To demonstrate compliance with the Voting Rights Act during thF ten year period preceding the filing of the declaratory judgment action under Section 4(a), Roanoke County and its governmental units must prove the following five conditions: (1} that they have not used any test or device that has the purpose or effect of denying or abridging the right to vote on account of race or color; (2) no fina~ judgment of any Court of the United States has determined that denials or abridgements of the right to vote on account of race or color have occurred anywhere in the County and its governmental units and no consent decree, settlement, or agreement has been entered into before or during the pendency of the declaratory judgment action that. results in the abandonment of such a practice; (3) no Federal examiners under the Voting Rights Act have been assigned to the County or its governmental units; (4) the County and its governmental units have complied with Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, including submission of all changes covered by Section 5 and repeal of all covered changes to which the Attorney General has successfully objected or the District Court of the District of Columbia has denied a declaratory judgment; and (5) the Attorney General has not interposed any objection not overturned by final judgment of a court - 2 - • N-~ and no Section 5 declaratory judgment action has been denied, witr respect to any submissions by the County and its governmental units, and no such submissions or declaratory judament actions are pending. 92 U.S.C. § 1973b(a) (1) (A)-(E) . In addition, Roanoke County and its governmental units must demonstrate the steps they have taken to encourage minority political participation and to remove structural barriers to minority electora~ influence by showing the following: (1) elimination of votina procedures and elections methods which inhibit or dilute equal access to the electoral process; (2) constructive efforts to eliminatE intimidation and harassment of persons exercising rights protected under. the Voting Rights Act; and (3) other constructive effort:, such as convenient registration and voting for every person of voting age and the appointment of minority persons as election officials throughout the County and at all stages of the election and registration process. 42 U.S.C. § 1973b (a) (1) (F) (i) - (iii) . To assist the Court in determining whether to issue a declaratory judgment, Roanoke County and its governmental units also must present evidence of minority participation, including the levels of minority group registration and voting, changes in those levels over time, and disparities between minority-group and non-minority- group participation. 42 U.S.C. § 1973b(a)(2). Furthermore, the County and its governmental units must demonstrate that during the - 3 - ~ ~ N-7 ten years preceding judgment they have not violated. any provision of the Constitution or federal, state, or local law governing voting discrimination, unless they show any such violations were trivial, promptly corrected, and not repeated. 92 U.S.C. § 1973b(a)(3). Finally, Roanoke County and its governmental. units must publicize their intent to commence a declaratory judgment action and any proposed settlement of the action. 42 U.S.C. § 1973b(a)(4). If Roanoke County and its governmental units show ~~objective and compelling evidence" that they have satisfied the foregoing requirements, as confirmed by the Department's independent investigation, the Attorney General is authorized to consent to entry of a judgment granting an exemption to coverage under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. 42 U.S.C. § 1973b(a)(9). The Defendant United States has conferred with Plaintiff Roanoke County and, upon investigation, has agreed that the Plaintiff is entitled to the requested declaratory judgment, subject to annual reporting requirements for a period of four years to which the parties have agreed as a basis for resolving this action. 42 U.S.C. § 1973b(a)(9) The parties have filed a joint motion, accompanied by a Stipulation of Facts, for entry of this Consent Judgment and Decree. - 4 - FINDING ~-~ Pursuant to the parties' Stipulations and joint motion, this Court finds as follows: 1. Roanoke County is a political subdivision of thF Commonwealth of Virginia, and a political subdivision of a state within the meaning of Section 9(a) of the Voting Rights Act, 92 U.S.C. ~ 1973b(a)(1). See Stipulation of Facts, 9[ 1. 2. There are two separate governmental units within Roanoke County: the town of Vinton and the Roanoke County School Board. SeF Stipulation of Facts, 9[ 3. ~. The independent cities of Roanoke City, Virginia an d Sal ern City, Virginia are not governmental- units of Roanoke County, Virginia and are not parties to this bailout action. See Stipulation o{ Facts, 9[ 4. 9. Roanoke County is a covered jurisdiction subject to the special provisions of the Voting Rights Act, including Section 5 of the Act, 92 U.S.C. ~ 1973c. See Stipulation of Facts, 9[ 5. 5. Roanoke County was designated as a jurisdiction subject to the special provisions of the Voting Rights Act on the basis of the determinations made by the Attorney General that Virginia maintained a "test or device" as defined by section 4(b) of the Act, 42 U.S.C. ~ 1973b(b), on November 1, 1969, and by the Director of the Census that fewer than 50 percent of the persons of voting age residing in the - 5 - e • N,~ state voted in the 1969 presidentia] election. See Stipulation of Facts, 9I 19. 6. No person in Roanoke County has been denied the right to vote on account of race or color during the past ten years. See Stipulation of Facts, 9I 2~. i. No "test or device" as defined in Section 9(c) of the Voting Rights Act, 92 U.S.C. § 1973b(c), has been used in Roanoke County for the preceding ten years. See Stipulation of Facts, 91 2:.;. b. No Court of the United States has issued a final judgment during the last ten years prior to the commencement of this action that the right to vote has been denied or abridged on account of racF or color in Roanoke County, and no consent decree, settlement, or agreement has been entered into resulting in any abandonment of a voting practice challenged on such grounds during that time. No such claims presently are pending or were pending at the time this action was filed. See Stipulation of Facts, 9[ 29. 9. No voting practices or procedures have been abandoned by the County or challenged on the grounds that such practices or procedures would have either the purpose or the effect of denying the right to vote on account of race or color. See Stipulation of Facts, 9[ 2 5 . 10. No Federal Examiners have ever been appointed or assigned to Roanoke County pursuant to Section 3 or Section 6 of the Voting - 6 - ..s~ Rights Act. See Stipulation of Facts, 9l 2E~. 11. The Attorney General has not interposed any objection to change affecting voting in Roanoke County and no declaratory judgment has been denied under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, and no such submissions or declaratory judgment actions are pending. RoanokF County never has sought Section 5 judicial preclearance from this Court. See Stipulation of Facts, 9I 27. 1~. The County does not employ any voting procedures o~ methods of election that inhibit or dilute equal access to the electoral process in the County. See Stipulation of Facts, 9I 28. 1~. The County and its governmental units have not enaared ir. other constructive efforts to eliminate intimidation and harassmen~ of persons exercising rights protected under the Voting Rights Acs because there is no evidence that any such incidents have occurred in the County in the last ten years. See Stipulation of Facts, 9I 2~. 14. The County and its governmental units have engaged in other constructive efforts that have provided expanded opportunity for convenient registration and voting for persons of voting age, and the County has appointed some minority persons as election officials. See Stipulation of Facts, q[q[ 30-37. 15. No evidence of increased minority participation is available because Virginia does not track voter registration and turnout by race. The overall level of voter registration h as - 7 - e • ~,_~ increased, although voter turnout has dropped off in recent years for reasons apparently unrelated to racy.. See Stipulation of Facts, 91 38. 16. There are no known incidents in Roanoke County wherE persons exercising their right to vote at the polls have been intimidated or harassed. See Stipulation of Facts, 5I 39. 17. There is no evidence that the County has violated any provision of the Constitution or laws of the United States or any State or political subdivision with respect to discrimination in voting on account of race or colon. See Stipulation of Facts, 9I 40. 18. Roanoke County has publicized the intended commencement of this action prior to its conunencement in 1.oca1 newspapers of genera! circulation and in appropriate United States post offices throughou~ the County in accordance with 92 U.S.C. ~1973b(a)(4). SeE Stipulation of Facts, 9[ 41. No aggrieved party has sought to intervene in this action pursuant to 92 U.S.C. ~1973b(a)(9). 19. Roanoke County and the governmental units within the County have obtained Section 5 preclearance for all voting changes enforced within Roanoke County during the ten-year period p receding this action. However, preclearance was not obtained in a t imely manner, i.e. before the changes were enforced, with respect to six annexations and boundary changes by the County and the town of Vinton, a March 16, 1992 amendment of Vinton's town charter that - 8 - permits town council members to become candidates for filling a vacancy in the mayoral seat, and an April %, 1998 amendment of N-~ Vinton's town charter that chanaes the timing of filling vacancie_ for mayor and town council members. All of these voting changes were submitted to the Attorney General for Section 5 review immediately before the present action was fi]ed, and have been precleared. SeE Stipulation of Facts, 9I 21. 20. As a basis for resolving this action, the parties havE agreed that Roanoke County will be subject to annual reporting requirements for a period of four years. The County will submit tc the United States an annual Report documenting all voting change adopted by the County as well as the two governmental units within the County during each calendar yeas. The first Report will be duE December 15, 2000, and subsequent Reports will be due each December 15, thereafter. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED: A. The Plaintiff Roanoke County, Virginia, is entitled to a declaratory judgment in accordance with Section 4(a)(1) of the Voting Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. ~ 1973b(a)(1); B. The parties' Joint Motion for Entry of Consent Judgment and Decree is GRANTED, and Roanoke County, including the town of Vinton and the Roanoke County School Board shall be exempt from coverage pursuant to Section 4(b) of the - 9 - ~ N-7 Voting Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1973b(b), provided that Roanoke County be subject to annual reporting requirement: as provided in paragraph 20, and provided that this Court shall retain jurisdiction over this matter for a period o~ ten years. C. This action shall be closed and placed on this Court's inactive docket, subject to being reactivated upon application by either the Attorney Ger.e.ra1 or any aggrieved person in accordance with the procedures set forth in 42 U.S.C. §1973b(a)(5). D. The parties shall bear their own costs. Entered this ~ ~` day of 2001. UNITED ST CIRCUIT J~UDG'~ U I ED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE - 10 - C7 Approved as to form and content: For the Plaintiff Roanoke County, Virginia ~~ ,~,~ GERALD HEBERT' ~J,! Gerald Hebert, P.C. 5019 Waple Lane Alexandria, VA 22304 (703) 567-5873 DC Bar No. 447676 Paul Mahoney County Attorney Roanoke County P.O. Box 29800 5204 Bernard DrivE Roanoke, VA 24018-078 (540) 772-2007 Far the Defendant Janet Reno and Bill Lann Lee: SEPH D. RICH t`ROBERT A. KENGLE JAMES T. TUCKER Attorneys, Voting Section Civil Rights Division United States Department of Justice P.O. Box 66128 Washington, D.C. 20035-6128. (202)514-6336 r. ~: N-7 WILMA A. LEWIS United States Attorney - 11 - O~ ROANp~~ L ~. r A ~ ~ ! r r J a~ z ^ ~ ,r1r 7 Y 7iY ~ 1~Y r1r T ~ ,r~r !-~ 1A~ .r1r N A P.O. BOX 29800 MARY H. ALLEN, CMC CLERK TO THE BOARD Internet E-Mail: mallenQwww.co.roanoke.va.us 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (540) 772-2005 FAX (540) 772-21 93 June 27, 2001 Mr. Fred Altizer District Engineer Virginia Department of Transportation P. O. Box 3071 Salem, VA 24153 Dear Mr. Altizer: BRENDA J. HOLTON DEPUTY CLERK Internet E-Mail: bholton a~www.co.roanoke.va.us Attached is a copy of Resolution No.062601-1 requesting VDOT to continue funding projects currently on the plan and adopt those projects identified as "Projects not on plan" for inclusion into the 2001-2007 Primary and Interstate Six Year Improvement Plan. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, June 26, 2001. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ~. ~-.~ Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Attachment cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development The Honorable Shirley J. Ybarra, Secretary of Commonwealth Transportation Board Lorinda G. Lionberger, Salem District, Commonwealth Mayor Ralph Smith, City of Roanoke Roanoke Valley Delegation to the General Assembly Senator John Warner, U. S. Senate Senator George Allen, U. S. Senate Congressman Robert Goodlatte Congressman Frederick Boucher Transportation, and Chairman, Transportation Board ® Recycled Paper OF ROANp,~.~ G ti• p ~ ~ 2 v a~ 1 38 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE MARY H. ALLEN, CMC CLERK TO THE BOARD Internet E-Mail: mallen@www.co.roanoke.va.us ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (540) 772-2005 FAX (540) 772-2193 June 27, 2001 Ms. Rita D. McClenny Virginia Film Office Riverfront Plaza 9012 E. Byrd Street Richmond, VA 23219 Dear Ms. McClenny: BRENDA J. HOLTON DEPUTY CLERK Internet E-Mail: bholton@www.co.roanoke.va.us Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 062601-7.e endorsing the Blue Ridge- Southwest Virginia Film Office, Inc. as the officially sanctioned agency to recruit film production in Southwest Virginia. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, June 26, 2001. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, .~• Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Attachment cc: File Bootie Chewning, President, Blue Ridge-Southwest Virginia Film Office Sandra Eubank, Vice-President, Bluer Ridge-Southwest Virginia Film Office The Honorable Donald L. Davis, Mayor, Town of Vinton ® Recycled Paper O~ pOANp,~~ L ~ ";,9 z c~ 1838 P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE MARY H. ALLEN, CMC ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 BRENDA J. HOLTON CLERK TO THE BOARD (540) 772-2005 DEPUTY CLERK Internet E-Mail: mallen@www.co.roanoke.va.us FAX (540) 772-21 93 Internet E-Mail: bholton@www.co.roanoke.va.us June 27, 2001 Mr. James D. Campbell, Executive Director Virginia Association of Counties 1001 East Broad Street, Suite LL20 Richmond, VA 23219-1928 Dear Mr. Campbell: Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 062601-7.c requesting the Virginia Department of Health, Office of Emergency Medical Services, to delay implementation of new EMS regulations until January 1, 2003. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, June 26, 2001. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, `-r'yZQ.~e.~-_ .mod Q~C..~-e-~~ Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Attachment cc: File Richard E. Burch, Jr., Chief, Fire & Rescue ® Recycled Paper a~ ptOANp,1.~ L ti p 9 ~ G'1 OJ, ~~ Z ^ ~ rY 1 1' ~LY ~ 1~' rY T A K rY ! Y L~~ rY Y1 r~ P.O. BOX 29800 MARY H. ALLEN, CMC CLERK TO THE BOARD Internet E-Mail: mallen@www.co.roanoke.va.us 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (540) 772-2005 FAX (540) 772-2193 June 29, 2001 Mr. Bob G. Semones 1542 South Pacific Drive Vinton, VA 24179 Dear Mr. Semones: BRENDA J. HOLTON DEPUTY CLERK Internet E-Mail: bholton@www.co.roanoke.va.us The members of the Board of Supervisors wish to express their sincere appreciation for your previous service to the Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission. Citizens so responsive to the needs of their community and willing to give of themselves and their time are indeed all too scarce. I am pleased to inform you that, at their meeting held on Tuesday, June 26, 2001, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to reappoint you as a member of the Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission for another three year term representing the Vinton Magisterial District. Your new term will begin on June 30, 2001, and expires on June 30, 2004. State law provides that any person elected, re-elected, or appointed to any public body be furnished a copy of the Freedom of Information Act. Your copy is enclosed. On behalf of the Supervisors and the citizens of Roanoke County, please accept our sincere thanks and appreciation for your willingness to accept this appointment. Sincerely, ~ ~•~~ Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board of Supervisors bj h Enclosure cc: Pete Haislip, Director, Parks, Recreation & Tourism ® Recycled Paper I O~ ROANp~-~ ~ ~S ' J~{ ~-U i (,{' (,/ ~ '- ;; ~ z :r c~ 1838 O~~ice of the County Administrator ELMER C. HODGE P.O. Box 29800 June ~9 2 Phone: (540) 772-2004 5204 Bernard Drive ~ 001 Fax: (540) 772-2193 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 E-mail: ehodgeC~3co.roanoke.va.us Darlene Burchasn, City Manager City of Roanoke Room 364, Municipal South 215 Church Avenue, S W Roanoke, VA 24011 Dear Darlene: On June 26, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors let stand an earlier decision of the Planning Commission to approve the construction of a City-owned parking lot on Carvins Cove Road in Roanoke County. This lot is proposed to serve the hikers, mountain bikers and horseback riders who access Cove property from the Bennett Springs side. The 30-space lot will be located approximately one mile from the gate at the end of Carvins Cove Road. The Board of Supervisors was convinced of the merits of this proposal due to the unsafe condition that currently exists with bikers and horseback riders parking along the narrow shoulders of Carvins Cove Road. The Board heard from quite a few citizens on this issue -some in favor of the lot and some opposed. Soiree of the concerns expressed to the Board were in regard to security of the parking lot and the high speed limit on this stretch of road between the lot and the gate. In order to address these concerns, Supervisor Church, who represents the Catawba District, spoke with Mayor Smith and asked that I convey to you the following requests to consider when designing the site and constructing the lot: Place a sign in the parking lot stating hours of operation (possibly dawn to dusk) and stating that alcohol consumption on this property is illegal. 2. Construction of atrail/greenway between the proposed parking lot and the gate, possibly in conjunction with mountain bike volunteers and the Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission. This would provide safe, off-road access to the Cove property for those users who want to use the novice trails only accessible at the gate. The County has requested that VDOT conduct a speed study on this section of Carvins Cove Road and consider lowering the speed limit from the current 55 miles per hour. As this section of the road is in Botetourt County, we are coordinating that effort with them. Darlene Burcham, City Manager Page Two June 29, 2001 I appreciate your consideration of these issues and look forward to working with you and your staff to provide amuck-needed public facility for our citizens. Sincerely yours, es ~~~~/f Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator cc: Joe "Butch" Church, Catawba Magisterial District Supervisor Members of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Brenda Holton -Closed Meeting Page 1 From: Brenda Holton To: Paul Mahoney Date: 6/19/01 8:42AM Subject: Closed Meeting Paul, please check this and see if it is correct for Closed Meeting for "economic development" and "Explore" as ECH asked at yesterday's meeting. Thanks. O. CLOSED MEETING pursuant to Code of Virginia Section 2.1-344 A (5) discussion concerning a prospective business or industry where no previous announcement has been made; and 2.1-344A (7) Consultation with legal counsel concerning negotiation of a contract with the Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority and Explore Foundation Mary Allen - BOS Ads From: To: Date: Subject: Martha, Tammi Wood legals@roanoke.com 6/7/01 3:42PM BOS Ads The Hall Applicant was given both the PC and the BOS ads. They did take the PC ad in and pay for it...Didn't they pay for the BOS ad at the same time? Please let me know...if not we will check with the applicant and remind them of the deadlines. The Worley Private Stable Applicant will be notified ASAP with the deadline for the BOS Ad so that they can hand deliver it as well...They hand delivered their PC Ad as well. Thank you Tammi L. Wood Community Development Planning and Zoning Division Roanoke County, Virginia twood@co.roanoke.va.us (540) 772-2068 Page 1 CC: David Holladay; John Murphy; Mary Allen n LEGAL NOTICE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board Of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, June 26, 2001, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Richard A. Hall to rezone 7.964 acres from I-2 Industrial District to AR Agriculture/Residential District for residences, located at Peaceful Drive (Rte. 821), Catawba Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Community Development, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: June 8, 2001 Mary H. Allen, Clerk to the Board Please publish in the Roanoke Times Tuesday, June 12, 2001 Tuesday, June 19, 2001 Direct the bill for publication to: Richard A. Hall 6273 Joyce Lane Salem, VA 24153 (540) 380-2607 SEND ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board Of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, June 26, 2001 in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the Petition of James and Sandra Worley to obtain a Special Use Permit for a private horse stable on 3.617 acres located at 4390 Harborwood Road, Catawba Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Community Development, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: June 8, 2001 Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board Please publish in the Roanoke Times Tuesday, June 12, 2001 Tuesday, June 19, 2001 Direct the bill for publication to: James & Sandra Worley 4777 Long Acre Drive Roanoke, VA 24019 (540) 362-2564 SEND ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 2 LEGAL NOTICE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board Of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, June 26, 2001, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the Petition of Faith Christian School to obtain a Special Use Permit to construct a new school, on 21.12 acres located on the north side of Buck Mountain Road (Rt. 679), Cave Spring Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Community Development, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: June 8, 2001 Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board Please publish in the Roanoke Times Tuesday, June 12, 2001 Tuesday, June 19, 2001 Direct the bill for publication to: Faith Christian School Incorporated 2014 Memorial Ave. Roanoke, VA 24015 (540) 343-2484 SEND ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 LEGAL NOTICE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board Of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, June 26, 2001, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of the Trustees of Evangel Foursquare Church to obtain a Special Use Permit for 48 acres for a church and day care facility located on the 5400 block of Indian Grave Road, Cave Spring Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Community Development, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: June 8, 2001 Mary H. Allen, CMC Clerk to the Board Please publish in the Roanoke Times Tuesday, June 12, 2001 Tuesday, June 19, 2001 Direct the bill for publication to: Trustees Evangel Foursquare Church 612 Bullitt Avenue, SE (Rev. Ken Wright) Roanoke, VA 24013 (540) 982-3694 SEND ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 4 PUBLIC NOTICE Please be advised that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, at its meeting on June 26, 2001, at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, Virginia, at the evening session beginning at 7:00 p.m. will hold a public hearing on the following: ORDINANCE REAPPORTIONING THE REPRESENTATION IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, BY ALTERING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE ELECTION DISTRICTS BY ESTABLISHING VOTING PRECINCTS THEREFOR, INCORPORATING A MAP SHOWING THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID DISTRICTS AND PRECINCTS, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE This ordinance amendment changes the boundaries of the Catawba, Cave Spring, Hollins, and Vinton election districts, and the boundaries of the Bonsack and Orchards, Botetourt Springs, Clearbrook, Glenvar, Lindenwood, Mason Valley, Mt. Pleasant, Northside, North Vinton, and Peters Creek Precincts; creates a new precinct called Woodlands Precincts; and eliminates the Woodlands precinct. A map showing these changes is available for public inspection at the office of the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors located at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive. All members of the public interested in the matter set forth above may appear and be heard at the time and place aforesaid. Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Roanoke County, Virginia Publish on the following date: June 12, 2001 June l9, 2001 Send invoice to: Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 ATTENTION: MS. MARY ALLEN MEMORANDUM To: Joe McNamara Fuzzy Minnix Tom Leggette Marion Roark Elmer Hodge Diane Hyatt Linda Weber Penny Hodge Rebecca Owens Fred Anderson Y rs . ~ From: Danial Morris L~ ,/ Date: May 10, 2001 Subject: Audit Committee Meeting The first Audit Committee meeting for the FY 2000-01 audit will be held on Tuesday, June 26, 2001 at 2:00 PM in the County Board of Supervisors conference room on the fourth floor of the Roanoke County Administration Center. At this meeting our auditors, KPMG Peat Marwick, will present their plan for the FY 2000-01 audit. If you have any particular areas of concern that you would like them to address during this years audit this would be the time to bring those items to their attention. Please let me know if you will be unable to attend. Mary .Allen - Re: June 26th BD. Meeting Page 1 From: Rodney Thompson /~ To: Mary Allen v Date: 6/14/01 1:57PM Subject: Re: June 26th BD. Meeting Mary what we were looking to do was to display the plasma screen at the Bd meeting on the 26th. this would not impair any existing equipment but did want to show and use it. This is to give everyone an idea about what we will or will not gain by going to flat screens over exisiting TV's or projectors. We would like to test prior to the meeting preferably early in the morning. With all groups present for that test. Rodney W. Thompson Roanoke County Communications Shop Communications Shop Supervisor 1216 Kessler Mill Rd. Salem, VA. 24153 (540) 387-6223 Email: Thompson@co.roanoke.va.us (540) 387-6223 ~~ ~' ~~'~""' ~~~s'~ ~~ ~ ~ »> Mary Allen 06/14/01 01:48PM »> Sounds good but I wouldn't do it on Board Meeting Day. The day before might be better or even sometime next week. If you want I'll check the schedule to make sure there are no meetings there. Mary H. Allen CMC Clerk to the Board County of Roanoke 540-772-2003 »> Rodney Thompson 06/14/01 09:34AM »> FYI: I have spoken with Turk at Lee Hartmans. He will provide the 42" plasma screen for use at the next Bd. meeting. For the presentation (powerpoint?). To make this occur we will need to test the presentation. At latest the morning of the BD. meeting, and to decide where and how to place the screen for the best test. Let me know if this is a good idea!!! Rodney W. Thompson Roanoke County Communications Shop Communications Shop Supervisor 1216 Kessler Mill Rd. Salem, VA. 24153 (540) 387-6223 r ~ (~ i'~!1 ds~ 1 N T E R MEMO O F F I C E Clerk to the Board To: Members of the Board of Supervisors From: Mary Allen m-~-- Subj: Recognition of Dr. Norma Jean Peters Date: June 22, 2001 Dr. Peters was recently selected as the Virginia Library Trustee of the Year by the Virginia Public Library Directors Association. We will be recognizing her at the June 26 meeting but IT WILL BE A SURPRISE BECAUSE SHE DOES NOT EVEN KNOW SHE WAS NOMINATED! She thinks she is attending the meeting because of a Library item that is on the agenda. We will have the Certificate from the Library Directors Association and we are preparing a Certificate of Recognition from the Board of Supervisors to be presented to her. Listed below is the information about Dr. Peters that was included in the nomination form. We will include portions of this in our Certificate of Recognition. "Although Dr. Norma Jean Peters has made numerous contributions to the welfare of the library in the last twelve months, it would be equally appropriate to recognize her for the "body" of her work over the past eleven years. During her tenure and---in no small part--due to her influence, the local government and the community became aware of the need to automate our library system; renovate and expand the size of our busiest branch; and establish a local history collection. As a respected educator, researcher and archivist, she was able persuade numerous area residents and groups to contribute unique and invaluable historical documents and possessions for the Local History Room. She continues to serve in an advisory capacity for the ongoing collection development efforts of this archive. In a related project, she provided guidance and essential contacts within the community for the successful completion of an award-winning oral history project. Dr. Peters has served on the Board of Trustees since February, 1989, having stepped in to complete the term of her predecessor who withdrew due to illness. Despite this unsought and sudden immersion into the world of public libraries, she became a champion of the library's interests and needs. She brought not just wise council and advice to three different directors but also a profound knowledge of the intricacies of governmental and political decision- [Name of Recipient(s)] Page 2 June 22, 2001 making. Countless times, she demonstrated an ability to analyze and concisely summarize a complex problem before the Library Board and often opened an avenue to approach the right person for a solution. During the past year, as the system made the transition between directors, Dr. Peters again provided a stabilizing influence, assuring continuity of Board support for our ongoing efforts. In spite of numerous personal and professional commitments, she agreed to assume the duties of Chair for her final year on the Board. As she concludes her service to the Library and, by extension, the entire community, she deserves recognition as a role model for other trustees, a mentor and advisor for directors, an exemplary volunteer, and an outstanding advocate for libraries. " CC: Elmer C. Hodge Brenda Holton - Re: Recognition Page 1 From: Diana Rosapepe To: Mary Allen Date: 6/18/01 8:40AM Subject: Re: Recognition This will work---I hope. For now, I'll paste a copy of the nomination form below because I have it only in WordPerfect, not Word. I can send the WP file if it would help. And yes, I get here early [approx. 7] because it is so peaceful, with no phone, etc. If you ever need anything, just call. Meanwhile, here is the text of the nomination: Although Dr. Norma Jean Peters has made numerous contributions to the welfare of the library in the last twelve months, it would be equally appropriate to recognize her for the "body" of her work over the past eleven years. During her tenure and---in no small part--due to her influence, the local government and the community became aware of the need to automate our library system; renovate and expand the size of our busiest branch; and establish a local history collection. As a respected educator, researcher and archivist, she was able persuade numerous area residents and groups to contribute unique and invaluable historical documents and possessions for the Local History Room. She continues to serve in an advisory capacity for the ongoing collection development efforts of this archive. In a related project, she provided guidance and essential contacts within the community for the successful completion of an award-winning oral history project. Dr. Peters has served on the Board of Trustees since February, 1989, having stepped in to complete the term of her predecessor who withdrew due to illness. Despite this unsought and sudden immersion into the world of public libraries, she became a champion of the library's interests and needs. She brought not just wise council and advice to three different directors but also a profound knowledge of the intricacies of governmental and political decision-making. Countless times, she demonstrated an ability to analyze and concisely summarize a complex problem before the Library Board and often opened an avenue to approach the right person for a solution. During the past year, as the system made the transition between directors, Dr. Peters again provided a stabilizing influence, assuring continuity of Board support for our ongoing efforts. In spite of numerous personal and professional commitments, she agreed to assume the duties of Chair for her final year on the Board. As she concludes her service to the Library and, by extension, the entire community, she deserves recognition as a role model for other trustees, a mentor and advisor for directors, an exemplary volunteer, and an outstanding advocate for libraries. Thanks a lot for your help, Mary. »> Mary Allen 06/18/01 07:45AM »> Yes, the certificate will be great. We'll plan for June 26 and let us know if Dr. Peters can not come that date and we'll move it to the next meeting. You must be an "early bird" too. Mary H. Allen CMC Clerk to the Board County of Roanoke 540-772-2003 »> Diana Rosapepe 06/18/01 07:37AM »> I'll send it along in just a minute [I'm in mid-construction of stable---data, not furniture]. We have the VPLDA certificate due back from the frame shop; could we use that as well? »> Mary Allen 06/18/01 07:35AM »> Sounds good. Do you want to plan on this for June 26 at 3 p.m.? If so, send or fax me a copy of the nomination and we'll do a Certificate of Recognition for Dr. Peters. Brenda Holton - Re: Recognition Page 2 ~ Mary H. Allen CMC Clerk to the Board County of Roanoke 540-772-2003 »> Diana Rosapepe 06/18/01 07:32AM »> Good Morning, Mary, Dr. Norma Jean Peters, who is this year's Chairman of the Library Board of Trustees, has been named Virginia Library Trustee of the Year by the VA Public Library Directors Association. I have the nomination form we submitted, if that would help. She has no idea she has been nominated, let alone that she has received the award [and if she did know, would probably want to shoot me]. Elmer thought he might be able to get her there on some pretext so we could surprise her with it. Since I need to put together a BOS report re the Infopowering grant money which just came in, perhaps we could use that as an excuse and ask that she attend. »> Mary Allen 06/14/01 10:47AM »> At debriefing yesterday, Elmer talked to you about a recognition at the June 26 (?) Board meeting. Can you give me some information so we can plan the recognition? Thanks. Mary H. Allen CMC Clerk to the Board County of Roanoke 540-772-2003 C~enda Holton - Re: Agenda Item E-2 resolution Page 1 From: Arnold Covey To: Holton, Brenda Date: 6/28/01 2:12PM Subject: Re: Agenda Item E-2 resolution Brenda, Hardy Road can not be added to the list because it's a secondary road. This resolution is for Primary and Interstate projects. I told Elmer this at our staff meeting wed. morning. »> Brenda Holton 06/28/01 01:10PM »> George and/or Arnold, will you add whatever statement you need to add Hardy Road to the resolution as moved by Dr. Nickens and a-mail to me. If you want to a-mail me the statement and where in the resolution it goes, I can put it in for you. Just let me know what you want to do to add it. Thanks, Brenda J. Holton Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 540-772-2005 bholton(~co.roanoke.va.us