The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About6/8/2010 - Adopted Board RecordsACTION N0. A-060810-1 ITEM N0. E-1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 8, 2010 AGENDA ITEM: Request to decline grant funds for a wetlands walking trail at the South Countylibrarysiteand tofundthetrailwithavailable bond proceeds SUBMITTED BY: Diane D. Hyatt Assistant County Administrator Lon Williams Landscape Architect APPROVED BY: B. Clayton Goodman III County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: On August 12, 2008, the Board of Supervisorsaccepted and appropriated a land andwater conservation grant from the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation in the amount of $77,700 to help finance the construction of the Taylor tract park and trail system at the site of the new South County Library. This was to be used for a raised walking trail through the wetlands to connect the trails in Starkey Park to the south and Darrell Shell Park to the east of the Taylor tract and to offer an educational opportunity about preserving wetlands. This grant was going to be combined with $50,000 of park capital maintenance funds and $30,000 of in-kind services (for parks maintenancestaffto buildthetrail}. Since that time, several issues have developed. 1. As partof the Merriman roundaboutdevelopment, we encountered a problemwith a previous grant from the same source that was used to develop the Darrell Shell Park. Due to restrictions that the grant placed on the property, we were in danger of not being allowed to use our own park property to improve the access to the roundabout. Because of this, before accepting grant money in the future we want to be very careful that we will still be able to use our own property as we choose. Page 1 of 3 2. Because of hiring freezes in the County, the parks maintenance staff is now smaller than it used to be so theydo not have the staff available to build thetrail in-house. We will have to have the trail built by outside labor. 3. When we bid similar raised wetland trails at Walrond Park, we found that the requirements associated with building in a wetlands made the cost of the trails much higher than we anticipated. Due to these increased costs and the need foroutside labor, the project estimate has increased from the $157,700 originally anticipated above to around $250,000. Because of issue number 1 above, we no longer want to use the grant money from the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation. We do not think it is worth losing control of our property for the relatively small amount of the grant. Since these funds need to be used by December 2010, it would be good to send a notice that we are declining these funds now, so that they can possibly be used by another locality. However, sincethewalking trailwasspoken of as an integral partof the newSouth County librarylpark/wetland experience, we think the trail needs to be included as part of the library project. FISCAL IMPACT: Because of savings in the construction bids, funds are available in the South County Library project site contingency that we can use to fund the trail. This is part of the project and an acceptable use of the bond funds. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the following actions: 1. Decline the land and conservation grant in the amount of $77,700 from the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation 2. Allocate $250,000 from the South County library project site contingency to the wetland walking trail. Page 2 of 3 VOTE: Supervisor Moore moved to approve the staff recommendation. Motion approved. Yes No Absent Ms. Moore ~ ^ ^ Mr. Altizer ~ ^ ^ Mr. Flora ~ ^ ^ Mr. Elswick ~ ^ ^ Mr. Church ~ ^ ^ cc: Diane D. Hyatt, Assistant County Administrator Lon Williams, Landscape Architect Rebecca Owens, Director of Finance Page 3 of 3 ACTION N0. A-060810-2 ITEM N0. E-2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 8, 2010 AGENDA ITEM: Request to move forward with the design and construction of the Glenvar Library SUBMITTED BY: Diana Rosapepe Library Director Diane Hyatt Assistant County Administrator APPROVED BY: B. Clayton Goodman III County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: In 2007, the County began making plans to renovate or replace the Glenvar Library. This is currently the top ranked project in the County Capital Improvements Program (CIP). Through previous research, it has been determined that the best course of action is to build a new library on the site, then demolish the existing structure. The current structure is 5,400 square feet. The new building will be around 15,000 square feet. Attachment A describes the current library and the proposed new library. Attachment B shows the historic timeline for this project. Staff began in earnest in 2007 working with the community and trying to set aside funding where possible for the project. However, when the economy took a drastic turn in the fall of 2008, it became difficult to direct additional funding to the project. In addition, the County was in the middle of constructing several major capital projects that had been approved before the economic downturn. FISCAL IMPACT: It is estimated that the Glenvar library will cost around $6 million. As shown on Attachment Page 1 of 2 C, this project can be funded with cash, rather than incurring additional debt for the County. The funds that are identified are all appropriate to use for non-recurring capital projects. The construction environment isstillveryfavorable. We maybe ableto realize savings in construction if we proceed at this time. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff is confident that Roanoke County can construct the Glenvar Library without depleting the County reserves or incurring any additional debt. The staff's recommended plan will allow the much needed Glenvar Library to be constructed now to meet community needs. If the Board approves the project to be moved forward, Roanoke County will advertise and hold the public hearing on June 22, 2010, and appropriate the funds at that time. VOTE: Supervisor Church moved to approve the staff recommendation. Motion approved. Yes No Absent Ms. Moore ~ ^ ^ Mr. Altizer ^ ~ ^ Mr. Flora ^ ~ ^ Mr. Elswick ~ ^ ^ Mr. Church ~ ^ ^ cc: Diane D. Hyatt, Assistant County Administrator Diana Rosapepe, Director of Library Services Rebecca Owens, Director of Finance Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENTA OVERVIEW OF GLENVAR LIBRARY Building size 5,400 sf Opened 1979 Items circulated 08-09 86,375 Number of visitors 08-09 65,334 Program attendance 08-09 3,046 No. of computers 9 Adult; 1 Child; 5 Staff WiFi available Yes Computer lab No Collection size 48,726 Items removed 08-09 due to lack ofspace -3,632 Current Conditions at Glenvar Library: • No renovations since 1979, except painting and recarpeting ten years ago • Worn furnishings & poor lighting • Limited shelving requires removal & disposal of over 3,000 items annually • Cramped and unappealing conditions discourage public use • No separate children's area (PC's for adults are in children's area) • No separate teen area • No quiet seating or browsing areas • Not ADA compliant (shelves too close together; no turning radius; aisles obstructed; no handicapped accessible entrance) • Insufficient number of computers to meet demand; some are partially in doorways • No computer lab so no computer classes as at other branches • Meeting room is too small for some programs or civic uses • Inefficient work spaces CIP Proposal for Glenvar Library: • Estimated cost of $6,000,000 • Replaces existing building with a 15,000 sf (+l-) library on the same site • Extensive browsing space and readers' seating • Attractive display areas • Sufficient shelving for books, plus collection expansion • Attractive children's area • Separate teen area • Larger meeting room and a conference room • More computers and an instructional lab • Self-checkout stations • Functional workroom and office spaces • Secure server and technology support room • Space for archival storage • Drive-through book pickup and return lane • Larger parking lot with improved traffic flow • Sustainable elements; LEEDTM certification • Flexibility to allow for future growth and changes in services ATTACHMENT B Glenvar Library Project Timeline of Events Date Event Budget Amount September 10, 2007 First community meeting held at the Glenvar Library to begin discussion of needs September 11, 2007 Board appropriates $100,000 to begin the needs assessment for Glenvar October 9, 2007 Second meeting with the community at the Glenvar library to discuss needs February 11, 2008 The County received an unsolicited PPEA proposal tobuilda newGlenvarLibrary April 8, 2008 Work session with the Board to discuss the unsolicited PPEA proposal. The consensus of the Board was to hold off until the funding is available May 9, 2009 VDOT paid the County for an easement to widen Rt 460 in front of the Glenvar library, and the Board appropriated this money to the Glenvar Library account 2008-09 Budget The budget included $450,000 to start the Glenvar adoption Library project, which was ranked #1 on the CIP Late 2008 -early 2009 The financial world as we knew it changed dramatically May 12, 2009 The Board approved the second mid-year budget reduction. This one included the elimination of the $450,000 CIP funds for the Glenvar Library 2009-10 Budget Budget cutbacks did not allow us to include the adoption planned $450,000 for the Glenvar Library 2010-11 Budget Budget cutbacks did not allow us to include the adoption planned $450,000 for the Glenvar Library July, 2010 Board appropriated additional funds to the Glenvar Library project Total current budget $100,000 74,509 450,000 (450,000) 450,000 (450,000) 450,000 (450,000) 25,000 $199,509 ATTACHMENT C Glenvar Library Project Recommended Funding Sources as of June 8, 2010 Estimate forGlenvar Project Funding Sources (1) Currently appropriated 2008 Bonds Interest earnings South County Library Roundabout funding (2) Site Improvements Major Capital (3) Minor Capital Health insurance reserves $ 6,000,000 Recommended Available Use $ 199,509 $ 199,509 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 450,000 - 2,339,030 1,455,491 2,845,233 2,345,000 500,000 - $ 6,000,000 (1) We used $450,000 of money that had been appropriated to the project in a mid-year budget cutback in 2008-09. (2) Anticipates the approval of $250,000 wetland trail work in previous board item. (3) We expect year end expenditure savings will restore around $2 million to the account. ACTION N0. A-060810-3 ITEM N0. E-3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 8, 2010 AGENDA ITEM: Request for adoption of the Stormwater Management Project List for fiscal year 2010-2011 SUBMITTED BY: Tarek Moneir Deputy Director of Development Services APPROVED BY: B. Clayton Goodman III County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: On May 11, 2010, staff presented at a work session with the Board of Supervisors an overview of the stormwater management program, a list of completed projects and a new list of projects for their consideration. Projects through P-327 were previously presented and approved by the Board of Supervisors. The status of these projects was discussed during the work session. Staff is now submitting projects P-328 through P-332 with maps and justifications for inclusion into the Stormwater Management Program for fiscal year 2010-2011. The new projects are prioritized according to adopted County policy and are shown in the attached Exhibit "A" Proposed Projects. Funding is available for projects remaining on the approved list up to project P-325. The request to fund the remaining projects will be presented during fiscal year 2011-2012. FISCAL IMPACT: No additional funding is being requested at this time. Page 1 of 2 ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve the requested Stormwater Management Project Listforfiscal year2010-2011 2. Deny the request STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of these additional drainage projects for inclusion into the Stormwater Management Program for fiscal year 2010-2011. VOTE: Supervisor Church moved to approve the staff recommendation. Motion approved. Yes No Absent Ms. Moore ~ ^ ^ Mr. Altizer ~ ^ ^ Mr. Flora ~ ^ ^ Mr. Elswick ~ ^ ^ Mr. Church ~ ^ ^ cc: Tarek Moneir, Deputy Director of Development Services Page2of2 ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve the requested Stormwater Management Project List for fiscal year 2001-2011 2. Deny the request STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of these additional drainage projects for inclusion into the Stormwater Management Program for fiscal year 2010-2011. VOTE: Supervisor Church moved to approve the staff recommendation. Motion approved. Yes No Absent Ms. Moore ~ ^ ^ Mr. Altizer ~ ^ ^ Mr. Flora ~ ^ ^ Mr. Elswick ~ ^ ^ Mr. Church ~ ^ ^ cc: Tarek Moneir, Deputy Director of Development Services Page 2 of 2 ACTION N0. A-060810-4 ITEM N0. E-4 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 8, 2010 AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: Request to accept and appropriate funds in the amount of $20,000 forthe South Peak Community Development Authority Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Smith/Packett LLC has deposited with Roanoke County $20,000 to reimburse the County for its costs and expenses in the creation of a Community Development Authority for the South Peak (Slate Hill) project. To date the County has incurred $7,750 in legal fees for Bonnie M. France, Esq. of McGuire Woods LLP. Staff is requesting the Board of Supervisors appropriate the sum of $20,000 in orderto use these funds to pay outside counsel fee invoices and to reimburse the County for the costs of staff time of the County Administrator, County Attorney and Assistant County Administrators involved in this project. County staff is maintaining time records for this reimbursement but no request for reimbursement for County staff is being made at this time. FISCAL IMPACT: Appropriation of $20,000 currently being held in escrowwith the Treasurer (Account 1141- 141359) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board appropriate these funds so that invoices can be paid and reimbursements made for County staff time incurred in the South Peak Community Development Authority project. Page 1 of 2 VOTE: Supervisor Moore moved to approve the staff recommendation. Motion approved. Yes No Absent Ms. Moore ~ ^ ^ Mr. Altizer ~ ^ ^ Mr. Flora ~ ^ ^ Mr. Elswick ~ ^ ^ Mr. Church ~ ^ ^ cc: Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Rebecca Owens, Director of Finance Page 2 of 2 ACTION N0. A-060810-5 ITEM N0. E-5 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 8, 2010 AGENDA ITEM: Request for approval of a "Change in Use Incentive Grant Program" and re-appropriation of $25,000 from the Public Private Partnership account to a new account for this purpose SUBMITTED BY: Doug Chittum Director of Economic Development APPROVED BY: B. Clayton Goodman III County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: As you are aware, increased regulatory requirements and procedures have made the process of converting a single family residence into a commercially used structure increasingly more expensive and challenging to accomplish. Many of these requirements are a result of changes to the uniform building code that we, along with most localities enforce. While this situation onlyoccurs roughlyfive orsixtimes ayearin the Countyand Town of Vinton, staff appreciates the concerns that have been expressed to us on numerous occasions by property owners and small businesses who are attempting to make such a conversion. These propertyowners and entrepreneursarecreating newjobs and tax base and are taking a calculated risk when they invest private dollars into these properties. Recognizing that there is currently no local program to assist individuals when they confrontthese issues, staff has attempted to design a simple, affordable and effective tool to not only financially assist them, but to also encourage more of this building conversion activity which is beneficial to us all. Attached for your review and approval is a draft guideline of a program being proposed that would provide financial assistance to property owners after they successfully complete a residential to business conversion. To summarize, the program would offeragrantequal to 30 percent of eligible "change in use" renovation costs with a minimum investment of $10,000 in total facility upgrades. The maximum grant allowable would be $5000 and Page 1 of 3 would be tied to the establishment of a business at the property. This may seem like a small amount, but to the small businesslpropertyownerswhoattemptthese conversions, this amount could make the difference in whether a proposed project is financially feasible. The Town of Vinton has expressed great interest in partnering with us on this initiative, much like we do with the matching grant facade improvement program. All areas and Magisterial Districts of the County, as well as the Town will benefit from this program should it be approved. There are only about 5 or 6 of these conversions a year so minimal funding will be needed to launch this new initiative and Vinton has agreed to financially participate on a 50/50 basis with the County on the grants that apply to properties physically located in the Town. Economic Development has identified funding from our existing Public Private Partnership account for projects located in the County. Mr. Mahoney has advised us thatthe Roanoke County Economic DevelopmentAuthority (EDA) must administer this proposed grant program, just as they currently administer the Commercial Fagade Matching Grant Program. At their May 19, 2010, meeting staff briefed the EDAon this proposal and they unanimouslyapproved arequest bystaffto administer the program if the Board of Supervisors so desire. The EDA further stated that they feel these types of initiatives are badly needed, especially in consideration of the challenges small business and investors have to contend with when they attempt to finance a commercial development project as a result of a tightened lending environment. In closing, staff believes the program will be easy to manage with a minimal amount of "red tape". The increased tax revenue as a result of these structures being converted to business should pay for the average grant in one or two years. Staff further believes that this is not only a wise investment but perhaps just as important, it serves as an expression of good will and commitment by local government to those small businesses that are looking for some assistance, and many times just aren't able to access larger scale economic development initiatives. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve the establishment of a "Change in Use Incentive Grant" based on the attached guidelines, and re-appropriate $25,000 from the Public Private Partnership account to a new account for this purpose. 2. Do not approve the grant program. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative 1. Page 2 of 3 VOTE: SupervisorAltizer moved to approve the staff recommendation. Motion approved. Yes No Absent Ms. Moore ~ ^ ^ Mr. Altizer ~ ^ ^ Mr. Flora ~ ^ ^ Mr. Elswick ~ ^ ^ Mr. Church ~ ^ ^ cc: Doug Chittum, Director of Economic Development Rebecca Owens, Director of Finance Page 3 of 3 Change in Use Incentive Grant Program Guidelines (Existing Single Family Structures to Commercial Structures) Purpose/Scope To offset increased costs related to a change in use of an existing residential structure from residential to commercial; to be applied in all areas of Roanoke County and the Town of Vinton that are zoned for commercial activity. To encourage facility improvements throughout the County and the Town of Vinton that will enhance property values and increase revenues from real estate, business personal property and business license taxes generated by the improvements and/or change in use of the property. To facilitate and encourage new business growth and expansions within the Town and County. Program Requirements • The Roanoke Economic Development Authority (EDA) will administer the program for both the County and the Town. A minimum investment of $10,000 in existing facility upgrades and/or renovations, including engineering costs and building permit fees associated with the project. Documentation of the "Total Renovation Cost" must be provided to county/town staff. "Eligible Reimbursable Expenditures" are those items that have been required by the county/town through Zoning and Building Code requirements that apply specifically to meeting commercial use standards. Examples are: Structural Compliance, Fire Flow Compliance, Handicap Accessibility, Parking Requirements, Landscaping, Off Site Roadway Improvements and any and all other costs determined by staff to be necessary to meet commercial use standards. Documentation of items eligible for reimbursement to the grantee shall be provided to county/town staff, along with verification of the change in use of the property from residential to commercial. The grant request must be tied to the establishment of a business at the property, and will only be approved at such time that a business occupies the building with the appropriate Business License (BPOL). If no business has located at the property within the one year eligibility period, grants will be awarded at the discretion of the EDA, and will be based on the applicant documenting their good faith efforts to locate a business on the property, thus honoring the intent of the Grant. An incentive grant of the "Eligible Reimbursable Expenditures" equal to 30% of "Total Renovation Costs" will be awarded to projects with a minimum investment of $10,000 in facility upgrades. The maximum grant allowable is $5,000. Grant requests must be submitted in writing to the Town of Vinton or the Roanoke County Office of Economic Development within one year from the date the improvements are completed and a final certificate of occupancy is issued. Requests submitted after that time will be denied. • Grants are made available on a one-time basis to any specific property/address. ATA REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JUNE 8, 2010 ORDINANCE 060810-6 AUTHORIZING CONVEYANCE OF A 20' WATERLINE EASEMENT TO THE WESTERN VIRGINIA WATER AUTHORITY FOR A WATERLINE ACROSS PROPERTY OWNED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORSATTHE NORTH COUNTYFIRE STATION#1, HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Roanoke County has constructed a new North County Fire Station Building located on Hershberger Road; and WHEREAS, the Western Virginia Water Authority (WVWA) requires aright-of-way and easement for a waterline on the County's propertyto provide waterservice tothe site as shown on the plat entitled "Plat showing new 20' waterline easement to be granted to the Western Virginia Water Authority and new permanent drainage & stormwater management reserve areas being created through the property of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, Tax #038.16-01-07.00, Roanoke County, Virginia", prepared by Lumsden Associates PC, dated May 11, 2010; and WHEREAS, the proposed right-of-way will serve the interests of the public and is necessary for the public health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Roanoke County. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance. A first reading of this ordinance was held on May 25, 2010, and a second reading was held on June 8, 2010. 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Roanoke County Charter, the interest in real estateto be conveyed is herebydeclared to be surplus, and is hereby made availableforotherpublic uses by conveyance to 1~JVUUAforthe provision of water service in connection with the North County Fire Station #1. 3. Thatdonation toU~JVWAof an easementand right-of-wayforawaterline and related improvements, within the easementarea designated on the above-mentioned map, on the County's property (Tax Map No. 038.16-01-07.00) to provide water service to the Page 1 of 2 w.\drawings\2007\07200\sur\07200es01.dwg N Q 0 bd T/ o~ 1 \ ~ v 1 a222n~1,1r '4~ o ~ ~~nr $~C 07200es01-layouti.plt 00 ~ ooaC a A Z ~ ~ A~~ ~ ~~ti ~ aa~o ga ~ ~~~ BLVD., N.E. °~ ~ ~"'~ ~ ~°~~ rom ~~ ~ ~ .~ ~Z s~ / ~ o i ~~~ ~ A~~o ~~ ~~ °~~r~~~~~m ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~9~~AZAaagg ~' ~'~ `~° ~Q~ ~ y ~ ~ 1 ~, c~ ~ ~ 1 \' ~~ ~ I~~ N ° ao~a~2~~~ C;$~y$iyy~jnOa CA~m~A~~~ ~ ~ ~J b 1 rp~ y ~ •~\ ~ ~~iA~ m~ti ~ ' `~ ~ S~ w n~~~2 m~~ ego ~. °' 1 ~ \ •. ~a°~~ ~°~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ \ Z~~a~ ~~o 0 0000000 ~~ ~ o ~6~0 '~ I I o n~a2Z ~ ~ v~~ ~ °ptpcNn~w`~+'00~ USVC ~ •• odx I x w ~ ~~2ya ~~~ v~H ,~~ cn~n ^y 2ycn2Z2y ~~~ ~,v m '~ ~co z ~~2 ~1 v~~ a~ vrn~ ~~c ~vw"n~V~,~ ~ #~ ~ I ~xJ~ ~ ~ ~;., ~ ~ ~,~mxa °c a •s,.~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ y NNE ~ r~w~N~Ny ~ ~ ro ~ I ° 1 °' ~T1 ~T1 ~~ ~ I •• p C I W C m ~ ~ ~ ~~ m I ~~ ''' ~ ° "~ I CO~~ o~ bah n o ~~' H 'Y 0 ~ ~ o x ~~ 0~ ~ ~ \p '~ ~It~1~J ~x ~~g~~ ~~~~ G7 ~~.. ~~~~ Q~ o~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~ ~~~~~~ `~ ~~ n ~~~~~~ v -~ R~y ~~ ~ ~~ ~a n~ ~~ ~~y~~~ ~~~ ~~ ti ~~~ a ~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~x ~ x~ A ~,, ~o ~ ~ ~ °O Q ~k~~Z~~~~7 y~O~J .0 ~°~ ~~~~~2~0~ ~~m~ D ~~y S p,0~o~(~ ~~~1~1'U y ~~ ~ on ~ ~°'~°~~~~~~c~D~~= biz 7 ~oC~~~~y~~~~~~o° ~~~ y ~ ~ ,croo~~o~~~ ~~~~ y~ ~~~ ~0~0~ v~~y ~~0~ ~~~ a ~ ~ ~ y o~ b ~ G~ ~ b ~ ~~ '~ b ti y ~~ „ooooo~a. „ ^:~'vrna~# I ro ~ I I I I I~ 2 l~ O 4 00000 g ~2 y y y 2 2 2 2 ~"N~aaN°ao O~C ~~~~w3~~~ m~~ a a ~ ~; ~ ~ rn ...... ~ ~ ~ N y i~o~•~g,~~~g ~~ i '`~~ ~d[jJ ! ~fA `did m ~ .. • • o 1 a A ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ f ~ l a ~ ~ ~N o r w I ~ ~ ~5 d 0 ~sn o r ~ ~ ( ~ / ~ / ~ ~ \ \ ~ ~~ ~~ fA ~ ~ '011 xz x ~ 'A / O G ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ / // ov S 04 41'25" W 333,39' / / / ~ $~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o I ~ ~` I ~ I ~~ / I ~ I ~ ~ I ! ~ _$ 0 ~ ~ ~ r ~~ .i~~ i '~ ~ ~ `. O~ ~ ~ ~ ``. ~ ~ ~ ,- i ~ ~ ~~~ p~'J ~ ~~~ o~,y~'C? ~i $ y~°~~,, ~ n ~ y $~ V b ~ i ~ yO,~~m g g ~ '~ ~ ~ ~~ o ~ ~~AH ~~l~~~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~yo ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ b Z ~ o~?~ y I ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ a ~~~ Ny~~o \ ~a ~ ~ o ~o~ ~~ ~ ~'; o~ O ~ 2 n o~~ ~~ nA Q ~E~~ oo °~, y~ ys A ~ 2 y~ cn oi~^~2 ° ' i o, o= rn ~ ~ o ~~ ~~ o~ ~~ MERIDIAN OF VIRGINIA STA TE PLANE SOUTH ZONE O A ~ O ~z ~d Z U C m~ 1 , z DATE: May», 20,0 LUMSDEN ASSOCIATES, P.C. , 4664 BRAMBLETON AVENUE SW PHONE: (540) 7744411 COMM. NO.: ~~ ENGINEERS-SURVEYORS PLANNERS P.o. Box zo669 FAX: (540) 772-9445 T S~A~E: ROANOKE, VIRGINIA ROANOIO:, VIRGINU- 24018 E-tiwL: -~wL(g~LUMSDENPC.COM 1'•100' ACTION N0. A-060810-7.a ITEM N0. H-2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 8, 2010 AGENDA ITEM: Request to accept and appropriate funds in the amount of $1,000 for the Saturday Substance Abuse Program to the Roanoke County Schools SUBMITTED BY: Brenda Chastain Clerk to the Roanoke County School Board APPROVED BY: B. Clayton Goodman III County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Roanoke County Schools Education Foundation allotted $1,000 to Roanoke County Schools to help supportthe Saturday SubstanceAbuse Program. The program began in 2002, has had wide-ranging influence and education for students and parents alike. The Saturday SubstanceAbuse Program is a collaborative effort among law enforcement personnel and Roanoke County Public Schools' Student Assistance Program. The program is for students who violate the Roanoke County Public Schools' substance use policy andlor the Code of Virginia and are referred by law enforcement or court services. Youth and their parents attend eight hours of substance abuse education expanding over two Saturday mornings. This program is designed to utilize existing services, enhance collaboration and offer an effective program with little funding. FISCAL IMPACT: The Saturday Substance Abuse Program budget will be increased by $1,000. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Appropriation of funds in the amount of $1,000 Page 1 of 2 VOTE: SupervisorAltizer moved to approve the staff recommendation. Motion approved. Yes No Absent Ms. Moore ~ ^ ^ Mr. Altizer ~ ^ ^ Mr. Flora ~ ^ ^ Mr. Elswick ~ ^ ^ Mr. Church ~ ^ ^ cc: Brenda Chastain, Clerk to the Roanoke County School Board Rebecca Owens, Director of Finance Diane D. Hyatt, Assistant County Administrator Page 2 of 2 ACTION N 0. A-060810-7. b ITEM N0. H-3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 8, 2010 AGENDA ITEM: Confirmation of appointment to the Parks, Recreation and Tourism Advisory Commission SUBMITTED BY: Becky R. Meador Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: B. Clayton Goodman III County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Supervisor Altizer re-appointed Tim K. Guilliams to an additional three-year term to represent the Vinton Magisterial District. Confirmation of the appointment was placed on the Consent Agenda. VOTE: SupervisorAltizer moved to approve the staff recommendation. Motion approved. Yes No Absent Ms. Moore ~ ^ ^ Mr. Altizer ~ ^ ^ Mr. Flora ~ ^ ^ Mr. Elswick ~ ^ ^ Mr. Church ~ ^ ^ cc: Arlain Martin, Secretary, Parks, Recreation and Tourism Advisory Committee