Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/18/2003 - RegularWorking Document -Subject to Revision Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Action Agenda November 18, 2003 Good afternoon and welcome to our meeting for November 18, 2003. Regular meetings are held on the second Tuesday and the fourth Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Public hearings are held at 7:00 p.m. on the fourth Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule will be announced. These meetings are broadcast live on RVTV, Channel 3, and this meeting will be rebroadcast on Wednesdays at 7:00 p.m. and on Sundays at 4:00 p.m. The meetings are now closed-captioned. Individuals who require assistance or special arrangements to participate in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings should contact the Clerk to the Board at (540) 772-2005 at least 48 hours in advance. A. OPENING CEREMONIES (3:00 p.m.) 1. Roll Call All present at 3:06 p.m. 2. Invocation: Dr. Morris Bennett Woodlawn United Methodist Church 3. Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag 6. REQUESTS TO POSTPONE, ADD TO, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF AGENDA ITEMS None C. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS 1. Resolution of appreciation to B. Clayton Goodman, III, for his 10 years of service as Town Manager for the Town of Vinton R-111803-1 MWA motion to adopt resolution URC 2. Proclamation declaring November 16 through 22, 2003 as "American Education Week" in the County of Roanoke 1 Proclamation accepted by Allyn Mitchell, Northside High School. Also present was Dr. Linda Weber, Superintendent. 3. Recognition of the Utility Department for receiving the 2002 Water Fluoridation Quality Award for Spring Hollow Water Treatment Facility from the United States Center for Disease Control and Prevention Ron Conner, Regional Field Director of the Virginia Department of Health's Lexington Environmental Engineering Field Office, presented the award to Gary Robertson and the following Utility Department staff representatives: Jeff Booth, Water Production Supervisor, and Toby Wiseman, Lab Supervisor. D. BRIEFINGS 1. Briefing regarding the 2002-2003 Annual Review of the Roanoke Valley Convention and Visitor's Bureau. (David Kjolhede, Executive Director of the Roanoke Valley Convention and Visitor's Bureau) Briefing presented by David Kjolhede. 2. Briefing regarding the Citizens Advantage System. (Anne Marie Green, Director of General Services) Briefing presented by Anne Marie Green. E. NEW BUSINESS Request to approve the transfer of funds in the amount of $245,000 from the Center for Research and Technology (CRT) capital fund account to the Roanoke County Industrial Development Authority (IDA) for the purpose of purchasing a 25 acre parcel known as Tax Map No. 63.00-01-01,B. (Doug Chittum, Director of Economic Development) A-111803-2 JBC motion to approve staff recommendation (approval the transfer of $245,000 from the CRT capital fund account to the Roanoke County Industrial Development Authority) URC 2. Request to authorize the County Administrator to execute a performance agreement between the Town of Vinton, County of Roanoke, the Roanoke County Industrial Development Authority, and Cardinal IG Company. (Doug Chittum, Director of Economic Development) 2 A-111803-3 MWA motion to approve staff recommendation (authorizing the execution of a performance agreement between Roanoke County, the Roanoke County Industrial Development Authority, the Town of Vinton, and Cardinal IG Company) URC 3. Request to approve the issuance of revenue bonds by the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County in an aggregate amount not to exceed $57,500,000 for the benefit of The Glebe, Inc. (Diane D. Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer) R-111803-4 JPM motion to adopt resolution URC 4. Resolution adopting a legislative program for the 2004 session of the Virginia General Assembly, and petitioning the General Assembly to favorably consider the topics and issues addressed therein. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) R-111803-5 JPM motion to adopt resolution as amended: Page 2, Item 4, "Support amending Sec. 15.2-1716 (reimbursement of expenses, DUI incidents) to increase the flat fee from $100 to $2~A $500, and to assess this fee as part of the court costs in the criminal/traffic proceedings. URC F. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA: Approval of these items does not indicate support for, or judge the merits of, the requested zoning acfions but satisfies procedural requirements and schedules the Public Hearings which will be held after recommendation by the Planning Commission. JPM motion to approve 1St readings 2"d readings and public hearings -12/16/03 URC First reading of an ordinance to obtain a special use permit to operate a telecommunication facility and broadcasting tower on 3.059 acres located at 6720 Thirlane Road, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Cellco Partnership. 2. First reading of an ordinance to obtain a special use permit to construct a mini warehouse facility on 4.0 acres located in the 5300 Block of Hollins Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Berk, LLC. 3 G. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES None H. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES None I. APPOINTMENTS 1. Blue Ridge Behavioral Healthcare 2. Grievance Panel 3. Library Board (Appointed by District) 4. Roanoke County Planning Commission (Appointed by District) Supervisor Flora nominated Gary Jarrell, Hollins District, to serve afour-year term which will expire on December 31, 2007 5. Roanoke Valley Resource Authority J. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. R-111803-6 HOM motion to adopt consent resolution URC 1. Approval of minutes -October 17, 2003 2. Request from schools to accept and appropriate student achievement grant funds in the amount of $12,179 for fiscal year 2004 A-111803-6.a 3. Request from schools to appropriate funds in the amount of $115,397 for student laptop fees A-111803-6. b 4 4. Request from schools to accept and appropriate drug-free communities grant in the amount of $99,956 from the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention A-111803-6.c 5. Request to accept Roselawn Court into the State Secondary System R-111803-6.d 6. Resolution authorizing the application, acceptance and appropriation of grants in the amount of $227,527 from the Office of Domestic Preparedness State Homeland Security Grant Program for the cost associated with terrorism related preparedness and response R-111803-6.e 7. Request to accept and appropriate Section 5311 grant monies totaling $122,888 from the Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation on behalf of Unified Human Transportation Services Inc. for the CORTRAN Program A-111803-6.f 8. Request to approve the donation of certain real estate for entrance improvements to the Vinton Business Center from Charles Dewey Mitchell, Vinton Magisterial District A-111803-6.g K. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS 1. Request to schedule joint work session with the Planning Commission on December 16, 2003, for the purpose of discussing the Comprehensive Plan. (Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator) It was the consensus of the Board to schedule the work session for December 16, 2003. Supervisor Altizer requested that a work session be scheduled on December 2, 2003, to discuss remote control operation of locomotives. It was the consensus of the Board to schedule the work session on December 2. 5 L. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS None M. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS None N. REPORTS HOM motion to receive and file the following reports URC 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Future Capital Projects 5. Statement of Treasurer's accountability per investment and portfolio policy as of October 31, 2003 O. CLOSED MEETING pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.2-3711 A (30) to discuss the terms and scope of a contract with the City of Roanoke for the creation of the Western Virginia Water Authority, where discussion in open session would affect the bargaining position or negotiating strategy of the County. At 4:31 p.m., JPM moved to go into closed session following work sessions URC Closed meeting held from 6:00 p.m. until 6:40 p.m. P. WORK SESSIONS (4th Floor Conference Room) 1. Work session to discuss the six-year secondary system construction plan for fiscal years 2004-2010 and review of the revenue sharing priority list for fiscal year 2004-2005. (Arnold Covey, Director of Community Development) Time: 4:41 p.m. until 5:10 p.m. Roanoke County staff present: Arnold Covey and Anthony Ford. VDOT staff present: Jeff Echols and Bill Manning. Planning Commission members present: Don Witt, AI Thomason, Steve Azar, Martha Hooker, and Tom Ross. 6 Mr. Covey advised that the following numbered projects are included in the six- year secondary construction plan for fiscal years 2004-2010: #0 -King Brothers Road, #1 -Hollins Road, #2 - McVitty Road, #3 -Old Cave Spring Road, #4 - Colonial Avenue, #5 -Buck Mountain Road, #6 -Cotton Hill Road, #7 -Mountain View Road, #8 - Boones Chapel Road, #9 -Catawba Creek Road, #10 -Dry Hollow Road, #11 -Merriman Road, #12 -John Richardson Road, #17 -Rocky Road. The allocation for incidental construction in Roanoke County is $330,000, of which approximately $153,500 is appropriated to rural road additions. There are currently 23 projects on the rural addition priority list. Mr. Covey reported that the Commonwealth of Virginia provides $15 million for the state revenue sharing matching program, with a maximum allocation of $500,000 per locality. Most of the revenue sharing projects involve street maintenance or re-paving. It was the consensus of the Board to schedule a public hearing for December 16, 2003, regarding approval of the six-year secondary construction plan and revenue sharing program. 2. Work session to discuss proposed revisions to the solid waste ordinance. (Anne Marie Green, Director of General Services) Time: 5:17 p.m. until 5:50 p.m. Ms. Green reviewed the current solid waste ordinance and provided recommendations for changes in some of the provisions. The following suggestions were made by the Board for inclusion in the proposed revisions: (1) establish standards regarding public roads (i.e., minimum road width, adequate turnaround, all-weather road, safety factors); (2) develop an appeal process for citizens to follow if it is determined that a private road does not provide safe access for County refuse collection vehicles; (3) it was the consensus of the Board that a requirement to bag all refuse would be difficult to enforce, and this issue should be handled through a public information campaign encouraging bagging of waste; (4) it was the consensus of the Board that a provision should be added requiring that trash cans be removed from the curb by 7:00 a.m. the day following trash collection. EVENING SESSION Q. CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION R-111803-7 JPM motion to adopt resolution at 7:03 p.m. URC 7 R. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS Chairman McNamara recognized two boy scouts, Nick and Lucas, who were present at the meeting. S. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Second reading of an ordinance to rezone .81 acres from R-1 Low Density Residential District to C-1 Office District with conditions in order to operate a general office, located at 2415 Electric Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the petition of Jeffrey Glick. (Janet Scheid, Chief Planner) 0-111803-8 JPM motion to adopt ordinance with conditions URC 2. Second reading of an ordinance to rezone 1.88 acres from I-2 Industrial District to AR Agricultural/Residential District in order to construct single family dwellings, located on Eagle Crest Drive, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Buck Mountain Land, LLC. (Janet Scheid, Chief Planner) 0-111803-9 HOM motion to adopt ordinance URC 3. Second reading of an ordinance authorizing the donation of surplus real estate, Tax Map No. 60.16-09-10, East Cleveland Avenue, Vinton Magisterial District, to Habitat for Humanity. (Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator) 0-111803-10 MWA motion to adopt ordinance URC T. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS Mr. Francis H. Wilson, 2049 Surrey Lane: He spoke regarding the following issues: (1) He requested a traffic signal at West Ruritan Road and Route 460. It was the consensus of the Board that staff should request a traffic study from VDOT regarding this matter. (2) He encouraged the Board to find a way to provide tax relief for senior citizens by utilizing more creative methods to increase tax revenues (i.e., the off-track betting which was recently approved in the Town of Vinton). (3) He advised that he feels Roanoke County's ordinance pertaining to fencing should include a provision that states if a fence is to equal or exceed 6', it must first be approved by the adjoining property owners. 8 Ms. Annie Krochalis, 9428 Patterson Drive: She spoke regarding the following issues: (1) She requested that the recent announcement of an $11 million surplus be used to provide staffing at the Catawba and Bent Mountain fire stations. (2) She provided an update to the Board regarding support for a rail solution to provide inter-modal methods of freight transportation. (3) She expressed appreciation on behalf of the Bent Mountain Civic League to the Board members who participated in their recent legislative forum. U. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS Supervisor Church: (1) He advised that he has a neighbor who wants to build a 2' x 3' stoop on the front of their home. He asked Ms. Scheid, Chief Planner, if this could be accomplished without having to go to the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA). Ms. Scheid stated that the current laws do not allow waiving of this requirement and noted that in this instance, the proposed addition violates the 30' setback requirement. At the request of Supervisor Church, staff is to review these requirements for possible modification in the future. (2) He requested that Mr. Hodge have staff evaluate the Montclair Estates swimming pool area in light of recent complaints. Supervisor Minnix: (1) He cautioned the Board to be diligent and wise in spending the $11 million surplus. He noted that additional funding requests will be received from other areas, and advised against spending one-time monies for recurring expenses. (2) He commended Chairman McNamara for an excellent job with this morning's State of the County Address, and thanked him for the kind words he expressed about him at the meeting. Supervisor Flora: (1) He voiced his support for a traffic signal at either East Ruritan Road or West Ruritan Road. He also requested that staff have VDOT evaluate the speed limit in this area. (2) He concurred with Supervisor Minnix's remarks regarding not spending the $11 million for recurring expenses. (3) He commended Chairman McNamara for his outstanding job on the State of the County Address. Supervisor McNamara: (1) He extended his thanks to the Board members for their support at the State of the County Address. (2) He advised that the Board has not made a practice of using one-time monies to fund ongoing expenses, and noted that the State of Virginia is currently working to resolve budgeting problems that were the result of this type of practice. (3) He stated that it has been a great pleasure to serve as Chairman during 2003. He noted that the State of the County Address will be re-broadcast on RVTV Channel 3 each Wednesday during the month of December at 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. Mr. Hodge: (1) He thanked Ms. Krochalis for her comments and noted that she is always working hard for the benefit of the Fire and Rescue personnel. He advised that the recently hired additional firefighters will graduate on January 7, 2004, and 9 will be in place at the Catawba, Hollins, and Mason's Cove fire stations in mid to late January 2004. V. ADJOURNMENT to November 19, 2003, at 9:30 a.m., Room 159, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia, for the purpose of a joint meeting with Roanoke City Council concerning the proposed Western Virginia Water Authority At 7:48 p.m., JPM adjourned the meeting until Wednesday, November 19, 2003 at 9:30 a.m., Room 159, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia, for the purpose of a joint meeting with Roanoke City Council concerning the proposed Western Virginia Water Authority. 10 i ~ ~ , r' ~ a ~ o ~ ,, c o co o ~ c~ c7 fl1 !L N ~ ~ ~ N y ~ LL. N N = ~ O 0+~ ~D ~ O O N • ~ T r ( Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Agenda November 18, 2003 ~• 01 ~. ~ ~ -« N N. z o 0 Good aft, ?~.~ ~, ~ N r ° ~ ~ meeting for November 18, 2003. Regular meetings o ~ ° N ~ ~, ~ o ~d the fourth Tuesda at 3:00 m. Public hearin s are held , s . ~ N o _ Y p• g are held ~ ~. v- ~, a ~ `~ o h Tuesday of each month. Deviations from this schedule ~ ~ coo 3 ° ~ < ~ N. meetings are broadcast live on RVTV, Channel 3, and this m°~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ on Wednesdays at 7:00 p.m. and on Sundays at 4:00 p.m. o o ~! cr m red-captioned. Individuals who require assistance or special `-° ~ ~., c °. ~ ~: ~te in or attend Board of Supervisors meetings should cont~ ~ ~ %-a ~ o ~ -t (540) 772-2005 at least 48 hours in advance. A. OPEN ~ ~ ~ ~ n N„ n.m.) C Ny = o 0 1. Rol I ~°oP ~ cr ~ (p .p CD 0 N r~ ~ 2. Invoc ~ ~ ~ . ~ . =~ osv~ o =• -~. 3. Pledg ~ ~ ~ B C No nett ° `ed Methodist Church N d States Flag ~ ~Q ~ N REQUES o o ~ m ~ f0, OR CHANGE THE ORDER OF RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS ;layton Goodman, III, for his 10 years of awn of Vinton 16 through 22, 2003 as "American ~anoke 3. Recognitio ~ Went for receiving the 2002 Water Fluoridatior ~N~ Ong Hollow Water Treatment Facility from the United : ._..~ renter for Disease Control and Prevention AGENDA ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~3 o N `D PROCLAN~ ~ ~ Z ~ G ~O G N . r ~ c° 1. Resoluti~ z~3 • ~.~. service a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ '` 2. Proclama Q~ ~ Education N 1 D. BRIEFINGS Briefing regarding the 2002-2003 Annual Review of the Roanoke Valley Convention and Visitor's Bureau. (David Kjolhede, Executive Director of the Roanoke Valley Convention and Visitor's Bureau) 2. Briefing regarding the Citizens Advantage System. (Anne Marie Green, Director of General Services) E. NEW BUSINESS Request to approve the transfer of funds in the amount of $245,000 from the Center for Research and Technology (CRT) capital fund account to the Roanoke County Industrial Development Authority (IDA) for the purpose of purchasing a 25 acre parcel known as Tax Map No. 63.00-01-01,B. (Doug Chittum, Director of Economic Development) 2. Request to authorize the County Administrator to execute a performance agreement between the Town of Vinton, County of Roanoke, the Roanoke County Industrial Development Authority, and Cardinal IG Company. (Doug Chittum, Director of Economic Development) 3. Request to approve the issuance of revenue bonds by the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County in an aggregate amount not to exceed $57,500,000 for the benefit of The Glebe, Inc. (Diane D. Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer) 4. Resolution adopting a legislative program for the 2004 session of the Virginia General Assembly, and petitioning the General Assembly to favorably consider the topics and issues addressed therein. (Paul Mahoney, County Attorney) F. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS AND FIRST READING OF REZONING ORDINANCES -CONSENT AGENDA: Approval of these items does not indicate support for, or judge the merits of, the requested zoning actions but satisfies procedural requirements and schedules the Public Hearings which will be held after recommendation by the Planning Commission. First reading of an ordinance to obtain a special use permit to operate a telecommunication facility and broadcasting tower on 3.059 acres located at 6720 Thirlane Road, Catawba Magisterial District, upon the petition of Cellco Partnership. 2. First reading of an ordinance to obtain a special use permit to construct a mini warehouse facility on 4.0 acres located in the 5300 Block of Hollins Road, Hollins Magisterial District, upon the petition of Berk, LLC. 2 G. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES H. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES APPOINTMENTS 1. Blue Ridge Behavioral Healthcare 2. Grievance Panel 3. Library Board (Appointed by District) 4. Roanoke County Planning Commission (Appointed by District) 5. Roanoke Valley Resource Authority J. CONSENT AGENDA ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE RESOLUTION IN THE FORM OR FORMS LISTED BELOW. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. 1. Approval of minutes -October 17, 2003 2. Request from schools to accept and appropriate student achievement grant funds in the amount of $12,179 for fiscal year 2004 3. Request from schools to appropriate funds in the amount of $115,397 for student laptop fees 4. Request from schools to accept and appropriate drug-free communities grant in the amount of $99,956 from the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 5. Request to accept Roselawn Court into the State Secondary System 6. Resolution authorizing the application, acceptance and appropriation of grants in the amount of $227,527 from the Office of Domestic Preparedness State Homeland Security Grant Program for the cost associated with terrorism related preparedness and response 7. Request to accept and appropriate Section 5311 grant monies totaling $122,888 from the Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation on 3 behalf of Unified Human Transportation Services Inc. for the CORTRAN Program 8. Request to approve the donation of certain real estate for entrance improvements to the Vinton Business Center from Charles Dewey Mitchell, Vinton Magisterial District K. REQUESTS FOR WORK SESSIONS 1. Request to schedule joint work session with the Planning Commission on December 16, 2003, for the purpose of discussing the Comprehensive Plan. (Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator) L. REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS M. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS N. REPORTS 1. General Fund Unappropriated Balance 2. Capital Fund Unappropriated Balance 3. Board Contingency Fund 4. Future Capital Projects 5. Statement of Treasurer's accountability per investment and portfolio policy as of October 31, 2003 O. CLOSED MEETING pursuant to the Code of Virginia Section 2.2-3711 A (30) to discuss the terms and scope of a contract with the City of Roanoke for the creation of the Western Virginia Water Authority, where discussion in open session would affect the bargaining position or negotiating strategy of the County. P. WORK SESSIONS (4th Floor Conference Room) 1. Work session to discuss the six-year secondary system construction plan for fiscal years 2004-2010 and review of the revenue sharing priority list for fiscal year 2004-2005. (Arnold Covey, Director of Community Development) 2. Work session to discuss proposed revisions to the solid waste ordinance. (Anne Marie Green, Director of General Services) 4 EVENING SESSION Q. CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION R. PROCLAMATIONS, RESOLUTIONS, RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS S. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 1. Second reading of an ordinance to rezone .81 acres from R-1 Low Density Residential District to C-1 Office District with conditions in order to operate a general office, located at 2415 Electric Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District, upon the petition of Jeffrey Glick. (Janet Scheid, Chief Planner) 2. Second reading of an ordinance to rezone 1.88 acres from I-2 Industrial District to AR Agricultural/Residential District in order to construct single family dwellings, located on Eagle Crest Drive, Cave Spring Magisterial District, upon the petition of Buck Mountain Land, LLC. (Janet Scheid, Chief Planner) 3. Second reading of an ordinance authorizing the donation of surplus real estate, Tax Map No. 60.16-09-10, East Cleveland Avenue, Vinton Magisterial District, to Habitat for Humanity. (Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator) T. CITIZENS' COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS U. REPORTS AND INQUIRIES OF BOARD MEMBERS V. ADJOURNMENT to November 19, 2003, at 9:30 a.m., Room 159, Noel C. Taylor Municipal Building, 215 Church Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia, for the purpose of a joint meeting with Roanoke City Council concerning the proposed Western Virginia Water Authority 5 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2003 RESOLUTION 111803-1 OF APPRECIATION TO B. CLAYTON GOODMAN, III FOR HIS TEN YEARS OF SERVICE AS TOWN MANAGER FOR THE TOWN OF VINTON WHEREAS, B. Clayton Goodman, III has served as Vinton Town Manager since 1993 and effective December 1, 2003, has been appointed as the Montgomery County Administrator; and WHEREAS, prior to becoming the Vinton Town Manager, Mr. Goodman, a graduate of Virginia Tech, served as Buena Vista City Manager from 1988 to 1993; City Manager of Austell, Georgia, from 1985 to 1988; Montgomery County Assistant Administrator from 1981 to 1985; and Administrative Assistant of Fairmont, West Virginia in 1980; and WHEREAS, Mr. Goodman, as the Vinton Town Manager, has consistently worked for the benefit of the Town of Vinton, Roanoke County, and the Roanoke Valley by supporting economic development projects, tourism, regional cooperation and innovative concepts; and WHEREAS, the citizens of Roanoke County and the Town of Vinton have benefited from Mr. Goodman's dedication and contributions through his activities and leadership on the Roanoke Valley Economic Development Partnership, the Fifth Planning District Regional Alliance, the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority, and the Roanoke Regional Cable Television Committee; and WHEREAS, during Mr. Goodman's service as Vinton Town Manager, many projects were completed including the gainsharing agreement with Roanoke 1 ` 4 County, cooperative fire and rescue efforts, establishment of the Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission, renovation of downtown Vinton, creation of the Vinton Business Center; and adoption of a cable television franchise agreement; and WHEREAS, Mr. Goodman has been a good friend and neighbor to the citizens of Roanoke County, and his enthusiasm, dedication, and commitment will be missed as he moves forward with his new responsibilities for the County of Montgomery. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, on its own behalf and on behalf of the citizens of Roanoke County, does hereby extend its sincere appreciation to B. CLAYTON GOODMAN, III for ten years of service to the residents of the Town of Vinton and for his dedication to maintaining the high quality of life for all of the people of the Roanoke Valley; and FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors does hereby extend its sincere best wishes to Mr. Goodman in his future endeavors as Montgomery County Administrator. On motion of Supervisor Altizer to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Flora, Church, Minnix, Altizer, McNamara NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Diane S. Childers Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Resolution of Appreciation File 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. C. -~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 18, 2003 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution of appreciation to B. Clayton Goodman, III for ten years of service as Town Managfer for the Town of Vinton APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge C~%~rn~,7 8-~~`- County Administrator O COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Mr. B. Clayton Goodman, III, has served as Vinton's Town Manager since 1993. Effective December 1, 2003, Mr. Goodman has been appointed to serve as the Montgomery County Administrator. Mr. Goodman has consistently worked for the benefit of the Town of Vinton, Roanoke County and the Roanoke Valley by supporting economic development projects, tourism, regional cooperation and innovative concepts. Some of the projects that were successfully completed during his tenure include: gainsharing agreement, cooperative fire and rescue efforts, establishment of the Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission, renovation of downtown Vinton, creation of the Vinton Business Center, and adoption of a cable television franchise agreement. Mr. Goodman has served on the Roanoke Valley Economic Development Partnership, the Fifth Planning District Regional Alliance, Roanoke Valley Resource Authority, and the Roanoke Regional Cable Television Committee. The County is appreciative of Mr. Goodman's leadership as Vinton Town Manager for the past ten years. This time has been set aside to recognize his service to the citizens of Roanoke County and wish him well as he moves to his new position. ~--~ 1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2003 RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION TO B. CLAYTON GOODMAN, III FOR HIS TEN YEARS OF SERVICE AS TOWN MANAGER FOR THE TOWN OF VINTON WHEREAS, B. Clayton Goodman, III has served as Vinton Town Manager since 1993 and effective December 1, 2003, has been appointed as the Montgomery County Administrator; and WHEREAS, prior to becoming the Vinton Town Manager, Mr. Goodman, a graduate of Virginia Tech, served as Buena Vista City Manager from 1988 to 1993; City Manager of Austell, Georgia, from 1985 to 1988; Montgomery County Assistant Administrator from 1981 to 1985; and Administrative Assistant of Fairmont, West Virginia in 1980; and WHEREAS, Mr. Goodman, as the Vinton Town Manager, has consistently worked for the benefit of the Town of Vinton, Roanoke County, and the Roanoke Valley by supporting economic development projects, tourism, regional cooperation and innovative concepts; and WHEREAS, the citizens of Roanoke County and the Town of Vinton have benefited from Mr. Goodman's dedication and contributions through his activities and leadership on the Roanoke Valley Economic Development Partnership, the Fifth Planning District Regional Alliance, the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority, and the Roanoke Regional Cable Television Committee; and WHEREAS, during Mr. Goodman's service as Vinton Town Manager, many projects were completed including the gainsharing agreement with Roanoke 1 C- i County, cooperative fire and rescue efforts, establishment of the Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission, renovation of downtown Vinton, creation of the Vinton Business Center; and adoption of a cable television franchise agreement; and WHEREAS, Mr. Goodman has been a good friend and neighbor to the citizens of Roanoke County, and his enthusiasm, dedication, and commitment will be missed as he moves forward with his new responsibilities for the County of Montgomery. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, on its own behalf and on behalf of the citizens of Roanoke County, does hereby extend its sincere appreciation to B. CLAYTON GOODMAN, III for ten years of service to the residents of the Town of Vinton and for his dedication to maintaining the high quality of life for all of the people of the Roanoke Valley; and FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors does hereby extend its sincere best wishes to Mr. Goodman in his future endeavors as Montgomery County Administrator. 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~,-c~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 18, 2003 AGENDA ITEM: Proclamation declaring November 16 through 22, 2003 as "American Education Week" in the County of Roanoke SUBMITTED BY: Diane S. Childers Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge ~f-~' ~~ County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Roanoke County Schools have requested a proclamation declaring November 16 through 22, 2003, be designated as "American Education Week" in Roanoke County. The County school system has long been recognized for providing outstanding educational opportunities, as well as for bringing together educators, parents, students and the business community in a shared enterprise. The requested proclamation recognizes the Roanoke County School Board, the public school system, its staff and employees, for their dedication to educating the children in our area. Ms. Allyn Mitchell, Northside High School, will be present to accept the proclamation. ~- a AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2003 PROCLAMATION DECLARING NOVEMBER 16 THROUGH 22, 2003, AS AMERICAN EDUCATION WEEK IN THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE WHEREAS, public schools are the backbone of our democracy, providing young people with the tools they need to maintain our nation's precious values of freedom, civility, and equality; and WHEREAS, by equipping young Americans with both practical skills and broader intellectual abilities, schools give them hope for, and access to, a productive future; and WHEREAS, education employees, be they custodians or teachers, bus drivers or librarians, work tirelessly to serve our children and communities with care and professionalism; and WHEREAS, Roanoke County Public Schools have a long and honorable history of providing an outstanding education at all levels, from elementary through high school; and WHEREAS, schools are community linchpins, bringing together adults and children, educators and volunteers, business leaders and elected officials in a common enterprise. NOW, THEREFORE, WE, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, do hereby proclaim November 16 through 22, 2003, as the 83~d annual observance of AMERICAN EDUCATION WEEK, in recognition of the Roanoke County School Board, the public school system, its staff and employees, and commend them on their dedication to learning, teaching and caring for our children, the future of Roanoke County. ACTION NO. ITEM NO. C - ~_ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 18, 2003 AGENDA ITEM: Recognition of the Utility Department for receiving the 2002 Water Fluoridation Quality Award for Spring Hollow Water Treatment Facility from the United States Center for Disease Control and Prevention SUBMITTED BY: Gary L. Robertson, P.E. Utility Director APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge ~~''""'' ~7- 4 County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Spring Hollow water treatment facility (WTF) has been in operation since January 13, 1996. During that time daily water production has increased from an initial flow of approximately 300,000 gallons per day (MGD) to the present average production of 5.35 MGD. As part of the treatment process, fluoride is added to the finished water to promote the dental health of its customers. State Health Commissioner Robert B. Stroube, M.D., M.P.H., states that "Fluoride is public health's No. 1 method of preventing tooth decay'. He further states that "Studies conducted over the past 50 years show that the consistent application of fluoride to public drinking water reduces cavities from 20% to 40%". Attached for the Board's information is a copy of a news release dated September 2, 2003, from the Virginia Department of Health, which announced that Roanoke County's Spring Hollow water treatment facility was one of six Virginia community water systems to receive the U. S. Center for Disease Control and Prevention's 2002 Water Fluoridation Quality Award. ~~ VDH comments from this news release include: - "All of Virginia's fluoridated water systems are monitored for safety and effectiveness, however, these six systems have met the nation's highest fluoridation monitoring standards" - "The operators of these systems were extremely conscientious and dedicated. They reached the level of consistency we want for all systems." Mr. Ron Conner, Regional Field Director of the Virginia Department of Health's Lexington Environmental Engineering Field Office, will be in attendance to present the 2002 Water Fluoridation Quality Award on behalf of the U. S. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Staff has presented the above information to make the Board aware of the excellent and conscientious employees who continually operate and maintain the Spring Hollow water treatment facility. They are to be commended for the professional manner in which they perform their duties and provide the finest quality drinking water possible. 3 1~6t5 ~_ I1~'t'i( ~i *~ .,, t tF :I' s .._:... ~, ~t{ li~ lll~l[ lYl >Cr.t~ ~ t1"ivlla I1.~.r I.s ~ A.w3.ls Sept. ?, ?flfl3 liar 1'4czrc Inforznatan Ccrntaet Lisa ~yrtzp {{}~} 7i~h-355 'I'.1-:~~ VIiR.CaIN~,~ I~E~',~~2'~"1V~:C~'iC` ~.1~ lE~k:~Ia'1"I I'It::~1~N'[''~; '.,TER 1~~C7~RIllAT1t~N QUr~LI!'~f:~`Y r11~Vr1,l~.DS Tt3 SIX Ct~~I.l~i;Jl~'IT1F,4 (Ric;izrz-raz~d, Va) _ The Virginian I7~partmezzt aF1-{ealth is in the: process of'presentizzg tine ~. S, Centez~ far nise~sse Car~tral aind 1'reventiazn's 2{1012 ~~l~ater Fluaridatiarz t~uanlity ~wazrd tca six Virginia camuzzity water systems far successfzzll}r znaintainirzg aptinlal fluoride levels and far nzeetiryg Virginia's f7nnoridatianz regrzireznents for all 12 months of last year. Tl1c CIS ranks the fluc>ridatiarz cif public drinking; water aznang the tpp 1 t) pniblie health ac:hievez~zents in tl'ze 2C)th century. ``.l~luarde is public; health's No. l nzethanf ofl~ze~~enting tooth decay," sazid State llralth. C"amnlissiarzer Rabat B. Str-aube, Iv1"D., l1rLP.Ii. "S'tudies carzducted aver the post St) }-~<irs show that the cazzsistent application of'fluaride to public drirzkizzg water re.duccs cavities fro ?{) p~rcezzt tc> ~(l percent." "1"hc award-winning water systczzzs af~ppalaclzia izz ~~~'ise ~.:ounty,l-3ilisville in Carroll County, arzd tkze city of E3ristol ret;eived their award :luly 31. Arragczrzcrzts are being; rnatle to present the award to Altavista in Cazzzpbell County, the city of 13edfard, and Roanoke Cczunty. l~czz~}~ oth~:r public wratcr sySterrns cazz~e close to rzzeeting the award's criteria failing to meet reclui~°ee~zts far only anc mantiz during the year. ``ill of Virginia's fluoridated. water systems are mazzitazcd far safety and effectivcrzess, howvever, ti.~ :~U six systezzls have met the nation's highest. f7uaridattion zzzonitaring standards," said l..isa Syrup, 1~.~.., fluoridation t;oardinartar far the Virginia Del~artzzzent at'1-1e~zlth. "T}~c c7}~eratrzzs of these systez~~s wv~re extremely canscier~tiaus arzd dedicated. "t`hty zcacizcd the level of cazzsistenc;y ~~=e want far all systc:rnzs." 'I°a wizz the avrard, system operators lzad to test fluoride levels an at least 75 pcrcezzt of the dazys irz cac:h rrzantlz, rx~aintain fluoride levels bctwecrz 0.1~ annd l .~# harts per znillian, have no nzorc~ than. 20 lzcrcerzt of daily tests exceed this range, and rnairztain levels so precisely that monthly samples deviated by zza mare than 0.2 parts per rnillian. Fluoridation is a preventive health measure that lzas been adapted by 13b of the state's 1,.375 camr~rzunity water systems, C:irants are availabir: firazzz the Virginian. llepartzzzcnt al"I-lealt tcz help co~x~nznzrzitc-s install and. rz~aintain f~uardatian systems. ""1"he people who get aptirnally fluoridaztcd water ozz a consistent basis c;njay zeal benel~ts,>' said S"yzvp. "Whey suffer fever cavities arzd save zzzraney. l~ar every ~l spent c>n fluaridatint; public water sn~pplcs saves citizens ~3 in dental bills." Ta learn more about camuzzity t~uaridatian in Virginia, visit ~v~~~~~~.~ ,~1~~ F~,i tt.~~rt~~c„tts. S ~ ACTION NO. ITEM NO. (~ - AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 18, 2003 AGENDA ITEM: Briefing regarding the 2002-2003 Annual Review of the Roanoke Valley Con~v/Iention and Visitors Bureau APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge ~ ~~8'`" County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This time has been set aside for David L. Kjolhede, Executive Director of the Roanoke Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau (CVB), to brief the Board regarding the accomplishments of the 2002-2003 fiscal year. A copy of the CVB annual review is attached for your information. `" die ~~=~~ ROANOKE "~~~ :: UALLEY of Virginia ROANOKE VALLEY CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU 2002-2003 ANNUAL REVIEW I', Introduction On behalf of the Board of Directors and staff of the Roanoke Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau, I am pleased to present this review of Bureau accomplishments for FY 2002/2003. In spite of the challenges of a weak economy, particularly at the state level, the bureau has had a productive year, as the data on the following pages indicates. In addition to the numbers displayed on the following pages, it should be pointed out that no organization operates "in a vacuum" and the Bureau is no exception. Partnerships with area Parks and Recreation Departments have led to a strong sports marketing program, while partnerships with member golf and hotel properties have resulted in a growing golf package initiative. The Bureau also works with the Arts Council of the Blue Ridge and its member organizations in a variety of marketing and legislative initiatives. Additionally, Bureau staff has been involved in branding programs with the City of Roanoke and the Regional Alliance. On a regional, state and national basis, the Roanoke Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau is active in a number of organizations. Bureau staff have active, leadership roles in the Shenandoah Valley Travel Association, Virginia Hospitality and Travel Association, Virginia Society of Association Executives and the Virginia Association of Convention and Visitors Bureaus. The Bureau is also involved in the Greater Washington Society of Association Executives, National Tour Association, Travel Industry Association of America and the International Association of Convention and Visitors Bureaus. Collectively and individually, all of the above mentioned partnerships and cooperative efforts provide opportunities to expand the tourism base and the tourism economy in the Roanoke Valley. When integrated with Bureau programs, a complete mosaic of marketing opportunities is created for the economic benefit of the entire region. David L. Kjolhede Executive Director i.. ~~~ Investment Results The Bureau budget for FY 2002/2003 was $1.2 million. The Bureau's stakeholders and partners included the cities of Roanoke and Salem, Roanoke, Franklin and Craig Counties, the Virginia Tourism Corporation and over 175 private sector members from the hospitality industry in the Valley and beyond. Utilizing conversion study results and conservative spending figures, the Bureau's budget generated the following revenues for the Valley and our partners: Leisure Travelers: Conventions Hosted: Sports Marketing: Motorcoach: Golf: $34,253,000 $33,726,000 $ 8,622,000 $ 1,179,000 $ 152,000 $77,932,000 Total Direct Spending These $77 million dollars are a direct result of Bureau-driven marketing programs and represent approximately 20% of the $369 million spent annually in the Valley by visitors, conventioneers, sports enthusiasts and group travelers. These figures are explained in greater detail throughout this report and utilize conservative figures from Bureau conversion studies and Visitor Center surveys. -i Leads Generated Conventions Booked Total Room Nights Booked Convention Sales 2oo~i2oo2 74 27 Total Convention Attendees Estimated Direct Spending 22,207 47, 095 $16,561,506 2002/2003 80 36 15,362 35, 009 $17,499,520 The RVCVB has continued focusing sales efforts on Valleywide meetings, conventions and events, which use multiple hotels and large meeting venues. This program is evolving as available dates, changing travel patterns, the economy, transportation costs and availability all continue to influence travel planner decisions. Target markets -Social, Military, Educational, Reunion, Fraternal (SMERF) and Associations are valid and viable options for the Roanoke Valley. Washington DC possesses the largest concentration of meeting planners in our region and one convention sales person was assigned to that market in January of 2002. Convention Leads Generated and Conventions Booked are up over the previous year. Total Room Nights and Convention Attendees are down, but this number is somewhat misleading. In 2001/2002, Sports Marketing was included in all Convention Sales categories. In 2002/2003 Sports Marketing is a totally separate category. The results are listed in a following section. Although it would appear to be an anomaly that direct spending is predicted to be up nearly $1 million over the previous year, with attendees down, it is not, for two reasons. The average spending per person for conventioneers is substantially higher than sports participants. New research conducted by the International Association of Convention and Visitor Bureaus indicates that in markets the size of the Roanoke Valley, convention attendees' spending on a daily basis increased about $30 per day. It should be remembered that this section deals with future business and unforeseen factors may influence the final numbers in either a positive or negative fashion. Overall, however, the trend would appear to be positive in growing the Valley's share of the meeting and convention market. I` i Sports Marketing 2001 /2002 2002/2003 Leads Generated These numbers were 7 previously included in Convention Sales figures. Events Booked - 8 Total Room Nights Booked - 8,769 Total Event Attendees - 21,240 Estimated Direct Spending - $8,622,500 * Includes Repeat: Commonwealth Games (13,000 att./1,603 TRNs) Virginia High School Wrestling (3,500 att./650 TRNs) With the Bureau's increased emphasis on Sports Marketing, it seems appropriate to establish a category for measuring results. Numbers in Total Room Nights, Attendees and Estimated Direct Spending reflect both groups the Bureau is directly responsible for bringing to the Valley and groups in which the Bureau partnered with members of our Sports Marketing Committee in the bid process or in providing support in hosting the event. In both instances, the process of attracting sporting events to the Roanoke Valley is cooperative in nature, involving the Bureau, local Parks and Recreation Departments, civic centers and the private sector. Building upon former successes -particularly those in Salem -has made this one of the fastest growing niche markets for the Bureau and the Valley. ~ ~ _ %~:f 1 1~ ~ Conventions Hosted 201/2002 Conventions Hosted Total # of Attendees Estimated Direct Spending * Includes Franklin Graham Crusade 52 65, 905 $21, 656, 383 2002/2003 50 115,970 $33,726,100 This section refers to conventions and meetings held in the Roanoke Valley in the past fiscal year in which the Bureau was involved. These conventions were the direct result of Bureau marketing efforts or joint marketing efforts with various meeting industry partners. The tremendous increase in Attendees and Direct Spending can be attributed almost exclusively to the Franklin Graham Crusade. This was a significant piece of business, but not one, which frequently occurs in the Valley. This tends to skew the year-end results to the positive for this year, but will have the opposite effect next year. ~~ ..__ I Motorcoach Marketing Leads Generated Total Room Nights Booked Overnight Trips Booked Day Trips Booked Estimated Direct Spending 2001 /2002 187 2, 965 123 78 $1,061,973 2002/2003 189 3,298 136 135 $1,179, 903 The Bureau aggressively markets to group travel planners, group leaders and the motorcoach industry both nationally and internationally. Direct mail, familiarization tours, trade shows and one-to-one sales efforts have proven to be effective methods of reaching our targeted audience. Generated Leads have remained relatively stable, but Total Room Nights, Overnight Trips, Day Trips and Direct Spending have increased 11 %, 10.5%, 73% and 11 %, respectively. For the second consecutive year, direct spending has exceeded $1 million. The Bureau's involvement with international tours, although conducted on a small scale, continues to pay dividends. With several upcoming "world-class" events scheduled for Virginia in the next 3-5 years, this market demonstrates continued growth potential. This market continues to be a positive for the Valley and should continue to be viable in the next few years. However, numerous factors, most significantly population demographics, can potentially impact this market segment and force changes in a relatively short time. ~_~ Tourism Statistics Visitor Information Center Attendance Hospitality Training Sessions AAA & Travel Agents Mailings AAA & Travel Agents On-Site Visits Travel Writers Assisted Travel Writers On-Site Visits 2001/2002 19,454 5 1,239 24 75 16 2002/2003 19,218 5 1,101 44 49 8 Tourism statistics reflect the Bureau's ongoing efforts to promote the Roanoke Valley utilizing non- advertising methods. Travel writers and AAA offices offer two of the most important targets for this type of promotion. AAA mailings were down slightly over the past year, due in part to an increased focus on regional markets. Additionally, on-site visits to AAA offices nearly doubled, helping to minimize the effect of reduced mailings. Travel Writer contacts are down significantly, but there is little concern at this point. Writers' interests seem to be cyclical in nature, with two or three strong years followed by a lull. Additionally, the Bureau is working to bring the Outdoor Writers of America Association convention to the Valley in 2007, which will definitely enhance our contacts and coverage. Hospitality training remains a key element in the Bureau's activities. Training sessions for "front-line" personnel are offered on a regular basis. Visitor Center numbers declined slightly. With many more visitor centers in the Roanoke Valley and increased use of the Internet, this is not surprising. The move by the Bureau to the Norfolk Southern Passenger Station in late 2003 should increase visibility, accessibility and raise the numbers of visitors served in the coming years. ~3...~.j Advertising & Editorial 2001 /2002 ' 2002/2003 Advertising Placement Budget $359,402 * $290,154 ** free Advertising & Editorial $1,164,927 $599,881 Includes $70,250 private co-op dollars ** Includes $65,292 private co-op dollars This section reflects the amount of dollars allocated to purchase advertising and the dollar value of free advertising and editorial the Bureau staff was able to leverage through efforts with travel writers and the travel trade. The Ad Placement Budget is comprised of dollars provided by our public and private sector members leveraged against matching grants from the Virginia Tourism Corporation, initially totaling $150,000. However, the State's declining revenue situation resulted in a mid-year cut in the matching funds program, which in turn, deprived the Bureau of over $67,000 in matching funds. This directly impacted the Ad Placement Budget for FY 2002/2003. With advertising dollars declining, the ability to leverage free editorial also was reduced. However, the biggest loss in this category was the result of a 4-page spread in Southern Living in FY 2001/2002 valued at over $440,000, which the magazine chose to not repeat in FY 2002/2003. With the State still struggling with their revenue stream, it would appear that there will be no matching funds programs for advertising in the foreseeable future. This makes it ever more critical that the Bureau develop other revenue streams and find ways to increase existing streams if we are going to maintain our current marketing programs. („-I Golf Package Program 2001 /2002 2002/2003 Marketing Budget Private Funds Rounds of Golf Played Rounds of Golf Revenue Room Nights Room Nights Revenue TOTAL REVENUE $55,000 $55,000 $14, 875 $40, 000 1,894 2,751 $58,500 $84,618 807 993 $51,635 $67,938 $110,135 $152,556 The Golf Package Program, started nearly 5 years ago in cooperation with member golf courses and hotels, has demonstrated a strong upward growth curve. Although the Marketing Budget has remained flat, increases have occurred in every category with Total Revenue Generated up over 38%. It should be noted that when this program started, the Bureau supplied the majority of the marketing dollars, with the understanding that as the program grew, participating hotels and golf courses would increase their financial participation. This has been exactly the case, as demonstrated in the Private Funds category. The Golf Package Program will continue to grow. The potential exists for additional golf courses and hotels to become involved in the program -increasing both the product and marketing resources available. / - '. Inquiries from Publications Leisure Convention Tour Operators /Travel Agents Phone / E-mail TOTAL INQUIRIES 2001 /2002 127,629 109 52 5, 269 133,059 Includes 11,0131nternet click-throughs/leads ,~~ f 2002/2003 97, 595 1.98 28 4, 698 102, 519 Pages Requested on Web Site Number of Client Sessions Number of Hits Number of Page Views 2001/2002 145,165 3,106,775 529,573 2002/2003 210,401 3,930,964 676,212 The majority of the Bureau's print ads are designed to elicit a qualified response or drive potential customers to our website. The fact that leisure inquiries are down can be attributed to two things; the reduction of advertising dollars and the sharp increase in website activity. Taken together, potential customers contacting the Bureau increased more than 25% over the previous year, despite the reduction of ad dollars. ~~ The leisure requests of $97,595, phone and a-mail of 4,698 and the client sessions of 210,401 represent over $34 million in direct spending. Conversion studies conducted by the Bureau indicate that 24% of people requesting information or registering on client sessions visit the Valley within 6 months. Another 57% indicate they will visit within the year, but they are not included in this formula. 312,694 requests X .24 = 75,046 X 2.7 ppl/party = 202624 X 2.45 days (avg. length of stay) _ 496,428 X $69 per person/day = $34,253,587 direct spending Search for: The Roanoke Valley of VA ~ ) Top 10 Inquiry Generating Publications Good Housekeeping Modern Maturity Better Homes & Gardens Virginia Travel Guide Blue Ridge Travel Association Parade Blue Ridge Parkway Association Ladies Home Journal Southeast Tourism Valassis Top 10 States Inquiring (via phone, a-mail and mail) Virginia Pennsylvania North Carolina New York Florida New Jersey Maryland Ohio Texas Georgia ~ ~ ..~ j ~ ~.. ~' '~ - Conclusion - Conventioneers, tour groups, sports participants and leisure travelers all contribute to the economic well-being of the Roanoke Valley. The Virginia Tourism Corporation's (VTC) most recent figures indicate that tourists spend over $369 million per year in the Valley, making tourism a $1 million per day industry. Certainly, outside forces such as economic uncertainty, homeland security and the "shake-out" in the travel industry will continue to impact tourism nationwide. However, the Roanoke Valley is well positioned as an affordable, driveable, enticing destination for many groups and travelers. The Bureau has done a good job of identifying these market segments and utilizing the dollars invested by our public and private partners to promote our area to them. Although the marketplace grows increasingly competitive and funding is a growing challenge, the Bureau will continue to develop innovative, cost effective programs to remain viable in the marketplace. The Valley possesses a great product mix and when this is combined with effective marketing, the tourism industry will continue to expand. _~ ACTION NO. ITEM NO. -~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 18, 2003 AGENDA ITEM: Briefing on Citizens Advantage System SUBMITTED BY: Anne Marie Green Director of General Services APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge ~~n~r ~°~'°~~'! County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Citizens Advantage System (CASY), formerly known as the Citizens Inquiry System, has been operational for almost two years. During that time, over 71,000 calls have been entered into the system and successfully resolved. In an effort to make this system even more accessible, beginning December 15 we will activate the Internet feature of the software, allowing citizens to directly input their own issues, questions and concerns. The Internet component is user friendly, and will be accessed through the County's website. Citizens will see a web submission form through which they can enter an issue, which will then be sent to the appropriate department as setup in the software database. Citizens will receive an inquiry number which can be used by them for follow up if necessary, and will also receive emailed information on the final resolution of the problem. Citizens will have access to this 24 hours a day, seven days a week, enabling them to start the process of finding an answer whenever they think about it, instead of waiting for the County's regular business hours. This feature will be publicized through RVTV, the County's web site, and a brochure which will be available at various County locations. Additionally, staff is currently working on an article to be published in the Virginia Review, sharing this information with other local governments. n ~ _n ~~. FISCAL IMPACT: There will be no fiscal impact, as the capability already exists within the computer software. ACTION NO. A-111803-2 ITEM NO. E-1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 18, 2003 AGENDA ITEM: Request to approve the transfer of $245,000 from the Center for Research and Technology (CRT) capital fund account to the Roanoke County Industrial Development Authority for the purpose of purchasing a 25 acre parcel known as Tax Map Number 63.00-01-01,B SUBMITTED BY: Doug Chittum Director of Economic Development APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The above mentioned parcel is located on Prunty Drive and is adjacent to the County owned Center for Research and Technology (CRT). In an effort to purchase property that is strategically located near the CRT, the Industrial Development Authority (IDA) has entered into a purchase contract with the current owner in the amount of $500,000. The IDA is conducting soil borings and a Phase I environmental report to ensure acceptability of the property. Closing is set on or about December 1, 2003. The IDA currently has funds in the amount of $260,000 that were realized from the sale of the Valley Gateway shell building in September 2003. Therefore additional funds are needed to purchase the additional acreage, and to advance the economic development goals of the Board of Supervisors. FISCAL IMPACT: Requested funding for the stated and approved purpose has been appropriated by the Board of Supervisors to the CRT capital fund account. Transfer of these funds to the IDA will reduce the balance in the capital account by $245,000. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the transfer of $245,000 from the CRT capital fund account to the Roanoke County Industrial Development Authority. VOTE: Supervisor Church motion to approve staff recommendation Motion Approved Yes No Abs Mr. Flora ® ^ ^ Mr. Church ® ^ ^ Mr. Minnix ® ^ ^ Mr. Altizer ® ^ ^ Mr. McNamara ® ^ ^ cc: File Doug Chittum, Director, Economic Development Diane Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer Rebecca Owens, Director, Finance 2 ,^ '1~ L ACTION NO. ITEM NO. [- - ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 18, 2003 AGENDA ITEM: Request to approve the transfer of $245,000 from the Center for Research and Technology (CRT) capital fund account to the Roanoke County Industrial Development Authority for the purpose of purchasing a 25 acre parcel known as Tax Map Number 63.00-01-01,B SUBMITTED BY: Doug Chittum Director of Economic Development APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge ~.~~-r.~ ~~~~~~ County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~ ~~.-~^~n~ SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The above mentioned parcel is located on Prunty Drive and is adjacent to the County owned Center for Research and Technology (CRT). In an effort to purchase property that is strategically located near the CRT, the Industrial Development Authority (IDA) has entered into a purchase contract with the current owner in the amount of $500,000. The IDA is conducting soil borings and a Phase I environmental report to ensure acceptability of the property. Closing is set on or about December 1, 2003. The IDA currently has funds in the amount of $260,000 that were realized from the sale of the Valley Gateway shell building in September 2003. Therefore additional funds are needed to purchase the additional acreage, and to advance the economic development goals of the Board of Supervisors. FISCAL IMPACT: Requested funding for the stated and approved purpose has been appropriated by the Board of Supervisors to the CRT capital fund account. Transfer of these funds to the IDA will reduce the balance in the capital account by $245,000. ,, ~ j,~~.~ vW ~,"'°. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the transfer of $245,000 from the CRT capital fund account to the Roanoke County Industrial Development Authority. ACTION NO. A-111803-3 ITEM NO. E-2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 18, 2003 AGENDA ITEM: Request for authorization to execute a performance agreement between Roanoke County, The Roanoke County Industrial Development Authority, The Town of Vinton, and Cardinal IG Company. SUBMITTED BY: Doug Chittum Director of Economic Development APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Cardinal IG has negotiated an agreement to purchase an 18.538 acre site located in the Vinton Business Center for the purpose of constructing a new 220,000 square foot production facility. This project represents a $23.9 million investment and will create 200 jobs within the first three years of operation. The Town of Vinton and Roanoke County have partnered on the development of the Business Center and will share new tax revenues per a gainsharing agreement between the two jurisdictions. In addition to State Workforce Training and Governor's Opportunity Fund incentives, a local incentive package has been offered to the company based on five years of new revenue created by the project. These incentives and the performance measures required for their dispersal to the company have been negotiated and are in the form of a performance agreement. FISCAL IMPACT: Per the performance agreement, the local incentives will be calculated as a reimbursement based on realized new tax revenues; therefore, the financial impact will be in the form of forgone revenue. No current funds are needed. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends authorizing the execution of a performance agreement between Roanoke County, the Roanoke County Industrial Development Authority, the Town of Vinton, and Cardinal IG Company. VOTE: Supervisor Altizer motion to approve staff recommendation Motion Approved Yes No Abs Mr. Flora ® ^ ^ Mr. Church ® ^ ^ Mr. Minnix ® ^ ^ Mr. Altizer ® ^ ^ Mr. McNamara ® ^ ^ cc: File Doug Chittum, Director, Economic Development Paul Mahoney, County Attorney 2 • DRAFT INCENTIVES AND PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT THIS INCENTIVES AND PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made as of this day of November, 2003, by and between the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, a .political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia, (hereafter, the "County"), the TOWN COUNCIL FOR THE TOWN OF VINTON, a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia, (hereafter, the "Town"), the INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia, (hereafter, the "Authority"); and CARDINAL IG COMPANY, a Minnesota corporation, (hereafter, the "Company"). WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, the Town Council of the Town of Vinton and the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia, desire to promote and encourage the economic development and vitality of Roanoke County and the Roanoke Valley through the recruitment of new business for the citizens of the Roanoke Valley, in order to provide for increased employment and corporate investment in Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, the Town is the owner of an approximate 100 acres of real estate known as the Vinton Business Center, located off Hardy Road (State Route 634) in the eastern portion of the County (the "Property"), and WHEREAS, the Company desires to locate a new production facility and development in this business park (the "Project"), and e . ~ t E-a WHEREAS, the County, Town and the Authority desire that the Company will create high quality employment opportunities for the citizens of the Roanoke Valley by the development of this Project which will promote economic development and generate new tax revenues for Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, this increased employment and investment constitutes a valid public purpose for the expenditure of public funds. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants contained herein, the parties agree to the following: 1. Site Development and Real Estate Option. The Town and the County will install an industrial access road to the Property, a natural gas main extension to the Property, water and sewer utility lines to the Property, and a storm water treatment/retention pond to serve the Property and that is necessary for the Company's development project, all as may be further described in the Purchase Agreement (as defined below) and in this Paragraph 1. A. Not later than July 1, 2004, the Town and County will extend water and sewer utility lines to the property line of the Plant Site (as defined below) and will assure that these public utilities will be available for connection to the Phase I building to be constructed by the Company. The Company's apportioned share of the water and sewer connection shall not exceed $10,000, payable out of New Local Tax Revenues as provided in Section 3.A. below. If the Town and the County fail to extend said utility lines as and when required herein, then each of the Company's deadlines or milestones set forth in this Agreement shall be extended for an amount of time equal to the number of days after July 1, 2004, through the date when the Town or County actually completes its work. • 6 2 B. Not later than August 1, 2004, the Town and County will complete construction of an industrial access road from Hardy Road to the property line of the Plant Site (the "Industrial Access Road"). The Industrial Access Road shall be constructed to VDOT standards, provided that application of the final wear course of asphalt shall not be required by the July 1, 2004 deadline and may be deferred for up to one-year thereafter. The Company's apportioned share of the Industrial Access Road construction costs shall not exceed $253,000, payable out of New Local Tax Revenues as provided in Section 3.A. below. If the Town and the County fail to construct the Industrial Access Road as and when required herein, then each of the Company's deadlines or milestones set forth in this Agreement shall be extended for an amount equal to the number of days after August 1, 2004, through the date when the Town or County completes its work. C. Pursuant to that certain Purchase and Option Agreement dated November , 2003, (the "Purchase Agreement") the Town has agreed to sell to the Company approximately 25.3 acres of the Property (the "Plant Site") and has granted the Company the option to purchase approximately 18.538 acres of the Property (the "Expansion Property"). The Plant Site and the Expansion Property are more specifically shown as Lot 3 and Lot 2, respectively, on the proposed survey of Vinton Business Center, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A. D. The County has applied to the Commonwealth of Virginia and will use its best efforts to secure a grant of up to $300,000 from the Governor's Opportunity Fund ("GOF") on behalf of the Company. The Town, County, and the Authority acknowledge that any GOF funds are for the sole use and benefit of the Company for this Project, subject to any reasonable 3 ~' ~: ~~ conditions, requirements and obligations imposed on the GOF funds in connection with such grant. E. The County or the Authority shall support, as necessary, the Company's application to the Division of Business Assistance for reimbursement to the Company of up to $120,000 for workforce services and training, subject to the rules of that program. 2. Site Development by the Company. A. The Company will cause the following improvements to be made, subject to obtaining ordinary and necessary municipal and governmental approvals from the Town, County, and any other governmental agency: (1) Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Company will acquire the Plant Site from the Town at a price of Ten Thousand ($10,000) per acre within approximately 180 days of the date of the Purchase Agreement. (2) The Company shall construct a 220,000 square foot manufacturing facility on the Plant Site, install new or relocated equipment therein, and provide employment at the Plant Site (the "Phase I Development"). The Company shall use its best efforts to enter into a construction contract for these improvements and to initiate construction of the building at the Plant Site within six (6) months after the date of this Agreement and shall use commercially reasonable efforts to complete construction of the Phase I Development as evidenced by the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy within eighteen (18) months after the date of this Agreement. The Company's Phase I Development will result in a minimum investment by the Company of $23,900,000, and the Phase I Development will employ at least 200 people within 36 months after the transfer of GOF grant funds as provided in Section 1.D.; provided that for • 6 4 .~ I«~ good cause shown and with the approval of the Commonwealth of Virginia, the County and Town may grant an extension for performance of an additional six (6) months. 3. Procedures for the reimbursement of Authority funds to the Comgany. A. Within 12 months after the date of this Agreement, the Town and County shall appropriate annually a sum sufficient to the Authority as an Economic Development Incentive Grant to the Company. These annual appropriations shall be made from five years of "new local tax revenues." The term, "New Local Tax Revenues," means the total of local real estate taxes and machinery and tools taxes generated annually by the Phase I Development, less amounts apportioned to the Company for: (a) the costs of water and sewer lines construction and connection fees as set forth in Paragraph 1.A and (b) the costs of constructing the industrial access road as set forth in Paragraph l.B, which amount of New Local Tax Revenues will be applied to payment of such costs apportioned to the Company. It is estimated that the amount of the Economic Development Incentive Grant, after such deductions, will total $604,230. The Authority, upon receipt of the appropriation of funds from the Town and County, will award an Economic Development Incentive Grant to the Company for the construction of the Company's improvements and facilities and new employment, after the deductions described above. Such payments will be made over a five (5) year period in accordance with this Agreement. The five-year period will commence when a final occupancy permit is issued for the Phase I Development and after the inspection and acceptance thereof by the County and/or the Commonwealth of Virginia, which shall occur not more than 60 days thereafter. B. Within sixty (60) days of the end of each calendar year, the Company shall provide such employment, financial and tax revenue data relating to the Phase I Development as may be reasonably required by the Authority so that the Authority may calculate the actual 6 5 reimbursement amounts. The Authority shall pay the annual reimbursement amount to the Company at an address designated by the Company within thirty (30) days after receipt by the Authority of the data. C. If the Company terminates this Project or fails to construct the Phase I Development within three (3) years of the date of this Agreement, then the Authority shall be relieved of any obligation to the Company for any Economic Development Incentive Grant. Provided that the Town, County, or Authority are not in default under the terms of this Agreement, in the event of termination, the Company will reimburse the Town, County, and the Authority for actual out-of-pocket costs as of the date of termination for utility relocation up to the amount set forth in Paragraph l.A and the Company's apportioned costs in constructing the Industrial Access Road up to the amount set forth in Paragraph 1.B. D. If the Phase I Development fails to generate the New Local Tax Revenues in the total cumulative amount of Eight Hundred and Ninety Thousand Dollars ($890,000.00) by December 31, 2009, the Company shall reimburse the Authority an amount equal to the difference between the actual New Local Tax Revenues payments actually made by the Company attributable to the Phase I Development and the total amount of Economic Development Incentive Grant actually paid to the Company, if greater than the New Local Tax Revenues payments made by the Company. This reimbursement shall be paid within sixty days of the end of the calendar year 2009, but no later than March 1, 2010. E. If the Phase I Development fails to generate 90% of the required 200 full- time employees ("full time employee" being defined as an employee scheduled for the Company's normal work week and eligible for Company benefits) within 36 months after the date when GOF grant funds as described in Paragraph 1. D. are transferred (subject to possible 6 ,._ extension as described in said Paragraph 1.D.), then the Company shall pay the Town the sum of $1,500 multiplied times the difference between (a) the actual number of full time employees at the Plant Site as of such time, and (b) said required 200 full-time employees. 4. The Company shall have the right to assign this Agreement to a separate entity provided that any such assignment shall not relieve the Company of its obligations herein. 5. If any party is unable to perform its commitments under this Agreement by reason of force majeure, then that party shall not be deemed to be in default of its obligations under this Agreement, and any deadlines for the performance of its obligations and, if applicable, the deadlines for the performance of the other party's obligations shall be extended for a time equal to the time period of the force majeure event, plus ten days. For example, if the Town or County shall fail to install utilities or roads to the Plant Site prior to July 1, 2004, the Company's deadlines for construction and employment shall be extended for a like period of time. The term "force majeure" as used herein, shall include without limitation acts of God, such as hurricanes, floods, fire, tornadoes, earthquakes, and storms; strikes or other industrial disturbances; unavailability of materials; acts of public enemies; orders of governmental authorities; insurrections; riots; and epidemics. 6. This Agreement shall be governed by and all disputes related hereto shall be determined in accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Agreement the day and year first above written. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA By: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator 6 7 .,,~ .. s „~ ..~ s .~ ~~..,, • Seen: INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ROANOKE COUNTY By: Chairman County Attorney STATE OF VIRGINIA ) )ss COUNTY OF ROANOKE ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2003, by Elmer C. Hodge, Jr., on behalf of the Board of Supervisors for Roanoke County, Virginia. Notary Public My Commission expires: STATE OF VIRGINIA ) )ss COUNTY OF ROANOKE ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2003, by ,Chairman of the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia. My Commission expires: / / • Notary Public e 8 TOWN OF VINTON ' By: Its: STATE OF VIRGINIA ) )ss COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2003, by , as of the Town of Vinton, Virginia. Notary Public My Commission expires: / / CARDINAL IG COMPANY By: Its: STATE OF ) )ss COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2003, by as of Cardinal IG Company. Notary Public My Commission expires: / / • 9 r C `~ '• i• 3 EXHIBIT A ~~~~ ~~~~ ~ ,~~ ~ . ~aR ~, ae~ ~~~ ~~ : r ~ e ~~ ~g ~ ~ ~ ,er~~ es.c~.oow - g ~ y y0'I1!_ ~ _ T _ - ~ ~.~F P ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ Y ~ 1 ~~ ~Y ~s ~ g ~ ~ ~-~ ~~ ~~ ~ e ~~~ ., ~. ~::..: ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~, ~a ~ -o ~~ ~o ~ ~~~ ~ ~o :z o ~ Z o ~ ~~ ~ ~ < z S ~ y QQ io• ~ ~~ ~ ~ > ~ ~ Z Z rn ~ ~ iii! ~!f ~ ~~ ~ ip ~ ~ ~ m ~s 5 z m m ~ % ~~ s ~ s ,.,; 3 ,. ~: I~ 0 YEitlgAN CF VNOAA STATE BANE RWIA MIEM NAD 63 W 0 ~ ' ~ . r~ Y o ~ ~O ~ C ~.. ~ ~ ~ 6 l a " y~4 1~ ACTION NO. ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 18, 2003 AGENDA ITEM: Request for authorization to execute a performance agreement between Roanoke County, The Roanoke County Industrial Development Authority, The Town of Vinton, and Cardinal IG Company. SUBMITTED BY: Doug Chittum Director of Economic Development APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge C~,G~ / ~'~'"~ County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Cardinal IG has negotiated an agreement to purchase an 18.538 acre site located in the Vinton Business Center for the purpose of constructing a new 220,000 square foot production facility. This project represents a $23.9 million investment and will create 200 jobs within the first three years of operation. The Town of Vinton and Roanoke County have partnered on the development of the Business Center and will share new tax revenues per a gainsharing agreement between the two jurisdictions. In addition to State Workforce Training and Governor's Opportunity Fund incentives, a local incentive package has been offered to the company based on five years of new revenue created by the project. These incentives and the performance measures required for their dispersal to the company have been negotiated and are in the form of a performance agreement. FISCAL IMPACT: Per the performance agreement, the local incentives will be calculated as a reimbursement based on realized new tax revenues; therefore, the financial impact will be in the form of forgone revenue. No current funds are needed. -~ STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends authorizing the execution of a performance agreement between Roanoke County, the Roanoke County Industrial Development Authority, the Town of Vinton, and Cardinal IG Company. DRAFT INCENTIVES AND .PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT C- a THIS INCENTIVES AND PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made as of this day of November, 2003, by and between the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, apolitical subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia, (hereafter, the "County"), the TOWN COUNCIL FOR THE TOWN OF VINTON, a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia, (hereafter, the "Town"), the INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia, (hereafter, the "Authority"); and CARDINAL IG COMPANY, a Minnesota corporation, (hereafter, the "Company"). WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, the Town Council of the Town of Vinton and the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia, desire to promote and encourage the economic development and vitality of Roanoke County and the Roanoke Valley through the recruitment of new business for the citizens of the Roanoke Valley, in order to provide for increased employment and corporate investment in Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, the Town is the owner of an approximate 100 acres of real estate known as the Vinton Business Center, located off Hardy Road (State Route 634) in the eastern portion of the County (the "Property"), and WHEREAS, the Company desires to locate a new production facility and development in this business park (the "Project"), and 1 E-a WHEREAS, the County, Town and the Authority desire that the Company will create high quality employment opportunities for the citizens of the Roanoke Valley by the development of this Project which will promote economic development and generate new tax revenues for Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, this increased employment and investment constitutes a valid public purpose for the expenditure of public funds. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants contained herein, the parties agree to the following: 1. Site Development and Real Estate Option. The Town and the County will install an industrial access road to the Property, a natural gas main extension to the Property, water and sewer utility lines to the Property, and a storm water treatment/retention pond to serve the Property and that is necessary for the Company's development project, all as maybe further described in the Purchase Agreement (as defined below) and in this Paragraph 1. A. Not later than July 1, 2004, the Town and County will extend water and sewer utility lines to the property line of the Plant Site (as defined below) and will assure that these public utilities will be available for connection to the Phase I building to be constructed by the Company. The Company's apportioned share of the water and sewer connection shall not exceed $10,000, payable out of New Local Tax Revenues as provided in Section 3.A. below. If the Town and the County fail to extend said utility lines as and when required herein, then each of the Company's deadlines or milestones set forth in this Agreement shall be extended for an amount of time equal to the number of days after July 1, 2004, through the date when the Town or County actually completes its work. 2 ~c'~ B. Not later than August 1, 2004, the Town and County will complete construction of an industrial access road from Hardy Road to the property line of the Plant Site (the "Industrial Access Road"). The Industrial Access Road shall be constructed to VDOT standards, provided that application of the final wear course of asphalt shall not be required by the July 1, 2004 deadline and may be deferred for up to one-year thereafter. The Company's apportioned share of the Industrial Access Road construction costs shall not exceed $253,000, payable out of New Local Tax Revenues as provided in Section 3.A. below. If the Town and the County fail to construct the Industrial Access Road as and when required herein, then each of the Company's deadlines or milestones set forth in this Agreement shall be extended for an amount equal to the number of days after August 1, 2004, through the date when the Town or County completes its work. C. Pursuant to that certain Purchase and Option Agreement dated November , 2003, (the "Purchase Agreement") the Town has agreed to sell to the Company approximately 25.3 acres of the Property (the "Plant Site") and has granted the Company the option to purchase approximately 18.538 acres of the Property (the "Expansion Property"). The Plant Site and the Expansion Property are more specifically shown as Lot 3 and Lot 2, respectively, on the proposed survey of Vinton Business Center, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A. D. The County has applied to the Commonwealth of Virginia and will use its best efforts to secure a grant of up to $300,000 from the Governor's Opportunity Fund ("GOF") on behalf of the Company. The Town, County, and the Authority acknowledge that any GOF funds are for the sole use and benefit of the Company for this Project, subject to any reasonable 3 ~"~"~e conditions, requirements and obligations imposed on the GOF funds in connection with such grant. E. The County or the Authority shall support, as necessary, the Company's application to the Division of Business Assistance for reimbursement to the Company of up to $120,000 for workforce services and training, subject to the rules of that program. 2. Site Development by the Company. A. The Company will cause the following improvements to be made, subject to obtaining ordinary and necessary municipal and governmental approvals from the Town, County, and any other governmental agency: (1) Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Company will acquire the Plant Site from the Town at a price of Ten Thousand ($10,000) per acre within approximately 180 days of the date of the Purchase Agreement. (2) The Company shall construct a 220,000 square foot manufacturing facility on the Plant Site, install new or relocated equipment therein, and provide employment at the Plant Site (the "Phase I Development"). The Company shall use its best efforts to enter into a construction contract for these improvements and to initiate construction of the building at the Plant Site within six (6) months after the date of this Agreement and shall use commercially reasonable efforts to complete construction of the Phase I Development as evidenced by the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy within eighteen (18) months after the date of this Agreement. The Company's Phase I Development will result in a minimum investment by the Company of $23,900,000, and the Phase I Development will employ at least 200 people within 36 months after the transfer of GOF grant funds as provided in Section 1.D.; provided that for 4 ~,~`" good cause shown and with the approval of the Commonwealth of Virginia, the County and Town may grant an extension for performance of an additional six (6) months. 3. Procedures for the reimbursement of Authority funds to the Company. A. Within 12 months after the date of this Agreement, the Town and County shall appropriate annually a sum sufficient to the Authority as an Economic Development Incentive Grant to the Company. These annual appropriations shall be made from five years of "new local tax revenues." The term, "New Local Tax Revenues," means the total of local real estate taxes and machinery and tools taxes generated annually by the Phase I Development, less amounts apportioned to the Company for: (a) the costs of water and sewer lines construction and connection fees as set forth in Paragraph 1.A and (b) the costs of constructing the industrial access road as set forth in Paragraph 1.B, which amount of New Local Tax Revenues will be applied to payment of such costs apportioned to the Company. It is estimated that the amount of the Economic Development Incentive Grant, after such deductions, will total $604,230. The Authority, upon receipt of the appropriation of funds from the Town and County, will award an Economic Development Incentive Grant to the Company for the construction of the Company's improvements and facilities and new employment, after the deductions described above. Such payments will be made over a five (5) year period in accordance with this Agreement. The five-year period will commence when a final occupancy permit is issued for the Phase I Development and after the inspection and acceptance thereof by the County and/or the Commonwealth of Virginia, which shall occur not more than 60 days thereafter. B. Within sixty (60) days of the end of each calendar year, the Company shall provide such employment, financial and tax revenue data relating to the Phase I Development as may be reasonably required by the Authority so that the Authority may calculate the actual 5 • r..... ~~" ~ ~ reimbursement amounts. The Authority shall pay the annual reimbursement amount to the Company at an address designated by the Company within thirty (30) days after receipt by the Authority of the data. C. If the Company terminates this Project or fails to construct the Phase I Development within three (3) years of the date of this Agreement, then the Authority shall be relieved of any obligation to the Company for any Economic Development Incentive Grant. Provided that the Town, County, or Authority are not in default under the terms of this Agreement, in the event of termination, the Company will reimburse the Town, County, and the Authority for actual out-of-pocket costs as of the date of termination for utility relocation up to the amount set forth in Paragraph 1.A and the Company's apportioned costs in constructing the Industrial Access Road up to the amount set forth in Paragraph 1.B. D. If the Phase I Development fails to generate the New Local Tax Revenues in the total cumulative amount of Eight Hundred and Ninety Thousand Dollars ($890,000.00) by December 31, 2009, the Company shall reimburse the Authority an amount equal to the difference between the actual New Local Tax Revenues payments actually made by the Company attributable to the Phase I Development and the total amount of Economic Development Incentive Grant actually paid to the Company, if greater than the New Local Tax Revenues payments made by the Company. This reimbursement shall be paid within sixty days of the end of the calendar year 2009, but no later than March 1, 2010. E. If the Phase I Development fails to generate 90% of the required 200 full- time employees ("full time employee" being defined as an employee scheduled for the Company's normal work week and eligible for Company benefits) within 36 months after the date when GOF grant funds as described in Paragraph 1. D. are transferred (subject to possible 6 - , extension as described in said Paragraph 1.D.), then the Company shall pay the Town the sum of $1,500 multiplied times the difference between (a) the actual number of full time employees at the Plant Site as of such time, and (b) said required 200 full-time employees. 4. The Company shall have the right to assign this Agreement to a separate entity provided that any such assignment shall not relieve the Company of its obligations herein. 5. If any party is unable to perform its commitments under this Agreement by reason of force majeure, then that party shall not be deemed to be in default of its obligations under this Agreement, and any deadlines for the performance of its obligations and, if applicable, the deadlines for the performance of the other party's obligations shall be extended for a time equal to the time period of the force majeure event, plus ten days. For example, if the Town or County shall fail to install utilities or roads to the Plant Site prior to July 1, 2004, the Company's deadlines for construction and employment shall be extended for a like period of time. The term "force majeure" as used herein, shall include without limitation acts of God, such as hurricanes, floods, fire, tornadoes, earthquakes, and storms; strikes or other industrial disturbances; unavailability of materials; acts of public enemies; orders of governmental authorities; insurrections; riots; and epidemics. 6. This Agreement shall be governed by and all disputes related hereto shall be determined in accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Agreement the day and year first above written. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA By: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator 7 ~~~~~. ~ -~. ~. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ROANOKE COUNTY By: Seen: County Attorney STATE OF VIRGINIA ) )ss COUNTY OF ROANOKE ) Chairman The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2003, by Elmer C. Hodge, Jr., on behalf of the Board of Supervisors for Roanoke County, Virginia. My Commission expires: Notary Public STATE OF VIRGINIA ) )ss COUNTY OF ROANOKE ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2003, by Chairman of the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia. Notary Public My Commission expires: / / 8 ~ -~ TOWN OF VINTON By: Its: STATE OF VIRGINIA ) )ss COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2003, by , as of the Town of Vinton, Virginia. Notary Public My Commission expires: / / CARDINAL IG COMPANY By: Its: STATE OF ) )ss COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2003, by as of Cardinal IG Company. Notary Public My Commission expires: / / 9 1~ w \ W' EXHIBIT A ~ ~ 8~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ M r~a~~ P$ p z g=' 9 ~9l~ ~~ ~ 1 P r ~ 1, ~~ ~. ~g, ~~ ;, ~ ;~ :'::, . `~ ~F~ ~R~ ~ ~ ~~ $ 4 70 ~~a r-- ~1 ~ ~ jO ~ 1 $ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ c c S z ~ ~. :z .~. ~~ ~ ~ < o z m ~ QQ i ~ Z Z o• iii . ti ~ ~~ - ~ °z N ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ A t1 ~ ~ ~ , 5 ~~ ~ ~ G Z s r~ MENOIAN OF MOAA STALE BANE ~~~ ~~ fi~ # o } ~ ~b ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~` ~ ~~ ~ NT~u~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~a ~a~ y= P" ~ ~ ~ 1~ ~' CERTIFICATE The undersigned Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia (the "Board"), hereby certifies as follows: 1. A regular meeting of the Board was held on November 18, 2003, at which meeting the following duly elected members were present or absent: PRESENT: Joseph McNamara Richard Flora Michael W. Altizer H. Odell Minnix Joseph "Butch" B. Church ABSENT: None Attached hereto is a true, correct and complete copy of Resolution 111803-4 adopted by a majority of the members of the Board present and voting at such meeting. 2. The resolution has not been repealed, revoked, rescinded or amended, and is in full force and effect on this date and constitutes the only resolution adopted by the Board relating to the issuance by the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia, of its revenue bonds for the benefit of The Glebe, Inc. WITNESS the following signature this 18th day of November 2003. [SEAL] Diane S. Childers, Clerk Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2003 A RESOLUTION 111803-4 OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF REVENUE BONDS BY THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ROANOKE COUNTY VIRGINIA, IN AN AGGREGATE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $57,500,000 FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE GLEBE, INC. WHEREAS, The Glebe, Inc. (the "Corporation"), anot-for-profit Virginia nonstock corporation, has requested the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia (the Authority ), to issue its revenue bonds, in one or more series from time to time, in an amount not to exceed $57,500,000 (the "Bonds") pursuant to the Industrial Development and Revenue Bond Act, Chapter 49, Title 15.2, Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended (the "Act"), and the Authority on October 22, 2003, adopted an inducement resolution with respect to the issuance of the Bonds; and WHEREAS, the proceeds of the Bonds will be used to finance the acquisition, construction, equipping and furnishing of an approximately 350,000 square foot facility and related single family cottages for the residence and care of the aged located in Botetourt County, Virginia (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, the Project includes, but is not limited to, the construction and equipping of approximately 133 independent living apartments, 19 single family cottages, a 32-bed private room nursing home, a 32-unit assisted living facility and community center space; and WHEREAS, the Authority on November 6, 2003, has held a public hearing on the issuance of the Bonds and the Authority has recommended that the Board of Supervisors (the "Board") of Roanoke County, Virginia (the "County") approve the issuance of the Bonds to comply with the Act and Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue of 1986, as amended (the "Code"); and WHEREAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution of November 6, 2003, recommending the issuance of the Bonds, a record of the public hearing and a fiscal impact statement with respect to the issuance of the Bonds have been filed with the Board. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA: 1. That the Board hereby approves the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority to the extent required by Section 147(f) of the Code and the Act. 1 a 2. That the approval of the issuance of the Bonds does not constitute an endorsement of the Bonds or the creditworthiness of the Corporation or an endorsement of the Project, to a prospective purchaser of the Bonds. As required by the Act, the Bonds shall provide that neither the .County nor the Authority shall be obligated to pay the Bonds or the interest thereon. or other costs incident thereto, and neither the faith and credit nor the taxing power of the Commonwealth of Virginia, the County or the Authority shall be pledged thereto. 3. That the County, including its elected representatives, officers, employees, and agents shall not be liable and hereby disclaims all liability for any losses of the Corporation or for damages to the facilities of the Corporation, including the Project, direct or consequential, resulting from the Authority's failure for any reason to act. 4. That this Resolution shall take effect on and after November 18, 2003. On motion of Supervisor McNamara to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Flora, Church, Minnix, Altizer, McNamara NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Diane S. Childers Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Doug Chittum, IDA Secretary/Treasurer Ed Natt, IDA Legal Counsel Diane Hyatt, Chief Fiancial Officer Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Rebecca Owens, Director, Finance 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. [ -~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 18, 2003 AGENDA ITEM: Request to approve the issuance of revenue bonds by the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County in an aggregate amount not to exceed $57,500,000 for the benefit of The Glebe, Inc. SUBMITTED BY: Diane D. Hyatt Chief Financial Officer APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge ~~~ l !I County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Glebe, Inc. would like to finance the acquisition, construction, equipping and furnishing of an approximately 350,000 square foot facility for the residence and care of the aged to be known as The Glebe, to be owned and operated by the corporation or its related entity, Virginia Baptist Homes, Inc, and situated on an approximately 65-acre site located in Botetourt County, Virginia. The Glebe would like to issue up to $57.5 million of tax-exempt bonds for this project. The Glebe is a 501(c)(3) corporation, and can only issue tax-exempt bonds through an Industrial Development Authority (IDA). Botetourt County IDA can accommodate this issue if they sell the bonds in 2003. If, however, the bond sale does not occur until 2004, it becomes problematic for Botetourt County because they are planning to issue bank- qualified debt that year. In order to issue bank qualified debt (which has a slight interest rate advantage), a locality must issue not more than $10 million in a calendar year. If a locality issues more than $10 million of debt in a calendar year, then none of the debt it issues that year can be bank qualified. ~_~ Roanoke County typically issues over $10 million in debt every year. We have issued over $10 million already in 2003, and we plan to issue more than $10 million in debt in 2004. Therefore, we are not planning to use bank qualified debt in either year, and the issuance of the Glebe IDA bonds will not adversely affect us, regardless if it is issued in 2003 or 2004. The Roanoke County IDA held a public hearing and authorized the sale of these bonds at their meeting on November 6, 2003. FISCAL IMPACT: The approval of this resolution will not have a financial impact on the County. It will mean that the County cannot issue bank-qualified debt in 2004. The County was not planning to use bank-qualified debt in 2004 because we will be issuing more than $10 million in debt. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approving the attached resolution that will allow The Glebe to sell up to $57.5 million of non-taxable bonds through the Roanoke County IDA. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2003 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF REVENUE BONDS BY THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ROANOKE COUNTY VIRGINIA, IN AN AGGREGATE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $57,500,000 FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE GLEBE, INC. WHEREAS, The Glebe, Inc. (the "Corporation"), anot-for-profit Virginia nonstock corporation, has requested the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia (the "Authority"), to issue its revenue bonds, in one or more series from time to time, in an amount not to exceed $57,500,000 (the "Bonds") pursuant to the Industrial Development and Revenue Bond Act, Chapter 49, Title 15.2, Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended (the "Act"), and the Authority on October 22, 2003, adopted an inducement resolution with respect to the issuance of the Bonds; and WHEREAS, the proceeds of the Bonds will be used to finance .the acquisition, construction, equipping and furnishing of an approximately 350,000 square foot facility and related single family cottages for the residence and care of the aged located in Botetourt County, Virginia (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, the Project includes, but is not limited to, the construction and equipping of approximately 133 independent living apartments, 19 single family cottages, a 32-bed private room nursing home, a 32-unit assisted living facility and community center space; and WHEREAS, the Authority on November 6, 2003, has held a public hearing on the issuance of the Bonds and the Authority has recommended that the Board of Supervisors (the "Board") of Roanoke County, Virginia (the "County") approve the issuance of the Bonds to comply with the Act and Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue of 1986, as amended (the "Code"); and WHEREAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution of November 6, 2003, recommending the issuance of the Bonds, a record of the public hearing and a fiscal impact statement with respect to the issuance of the Bonds have been filed with the Board. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA: 1. That the Board hereby approves the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority to the extent required by Section 147(f) of the Code and the Act. C3 2. That the approval of the issuance of the Bonds does not constitute an endorsement of the Bonds or the creditworthiness of the Corporation or an endorsement of the Project, to a prospective purchaser of the Bonds. As required by the Act, the Bonds shall provide that neither the County nor the Authority shall be obligated to pay the Bonds or the interest thereon or other costs incident thereto, and neither the faith and credit nor the taxing power of the Commonwealth of Virginia, the County or the Authority shall be pledged thereto. 3. That the County, including its elected representatives, officers, employees, and agents shall not be liable and hereby disclaims all liability for any losses of the Corporation or for damages to the facilities of the Corporation, including the Project, direct or consequential, resulting from the Authority's failure for any reason to act. 4. That this Resolution shall take effect on and after November 18, 2003. 2 E-3 CERTIFICATE The undersigned Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia (the "Board"), hereby certifies as follows: 1. A regular meeting of the Board was held on November _, 2003, at which meeting the following duly elected members were present or absent: PRESENT: Joseph McNamara Richard Flora Michael W. Altizer H. Odell Minnix Joseph "Butch" B. Church ABSENT: None Attached hereto is a true, correct and complete copy of a resolution adopted by a majority of the members of the Board present and voting at such meeting. 2. The resolution has not been repealed, revoked, rescinded or amended, and is in full force and effect on this date and constitutes the only resolution adopted by the Board relating to the issuance by the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia, of its revenue bonds for the benefit of The Glebe, Inc. WITNESS the following signature this day of November, 2003. [SEAL] Diane S. Childers, Clerk Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia 3 36434.000007 RICHMOND 1075159x2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2003 RESOLUTION 111803-5 ADOPTING A LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM FOR THE 2004 SESSION OF THE VIRGINIA GENERAL ASSEMBLY, AND PETITIONING THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY TO FAVORABLY CONSIDER THE TOPICS AND ISSUES ADDRESSED HEREIN WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, has identified major legislative issues of state-wide concern to be considered by the 2004 session of the Virginia General Assembly; and WHEREAS, the Board adopts this resolution as its Legislative Program for the 2004 session of the Virginia General Assembly. NOW, THEREFORE, Be It Resolved by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the following legislative initiatives are submitted for its legislative program for the 2004 session of the Virginia General Assembly for its favorable consideration and adoption. 1) Approve an amendment to the Roanoke County Charter as follows: Sec. 2.02 -Taxing powers. - In addition to the powers granted by other sections of the charter and general law, the county shall have the additional power to levy and collect taxes on cigarettes and tobacco products, pursuant to Section 58.1-3832 of the Code of Virginia. 2) Support the JLARC recommendations to address the shortfall in state funding for K-12 education and to fully fund the state Board of Education proposals. 1 The estimated annual cost of funding both the JLARC recommendations and Board of Education proposals is $870 Million. 3) Support tax restructuring that grants localities additional revenue authority and increases local revenue diversification. 4) Support amending Sec. 15.2-1716 (reimbursement of expenses, DUI incidents) to increase the flat fee from $100 to $500, and to assess this fee as part of the court costs in the criminal/traffic proceedings. 5) Support additional state funding for transportation, and in particular, funding for improvements to I-81. 6) Support legislation that would fund the Smart Road project from statewide funds instead of from the Salem District. This project represents an economic benefit to the entire Commonwealth, therefore funding should not come solely from this region's highway allocation. 7) Oppose revisions to a merged state/local telecommunications tax that would be collected by the state and redistributed back to localities; oppose telecommunications tax reform that is not part of a comprehensive tax restructuring program; oppose efforts to reduce the amount or control of local governments over the E-911 tax. 8) Oppose the proposal to impose a state surcharge on tipping fees for each ton of solid waste received by any municipal solid waste disposal facility, or a state surcharge on water usage. 2 File The Honorable Morgan Griffith, Delegate The Honorable Onzlee Ware, Delegate-Elect The Honorable William Fralin, Delegate-Elect The Honorable John S. Edwards, Senator The Honorable Brandon Bell, Senator-Elect The Honorable Bruce F. Jamerson, Clerk of the House of Delegates The Honorable Susan Clarke Schaar, Clerk of the Senate Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Pete Geisen, Special Assistant for Legislative Relations Mary F. Parker, Clerk, Roanoke City Council Roanoke City Council, Members Forest Jones, Clerk for Salem City Council Salem City Council, Members Carolyn S. Ross, Clerk, Vinton Town Council Vinton Town Council, Members Wayne Strickland, Executive Director, Roanoke Valley-Alleghany Regional Commission James D. Campbell, Executive Director, Virginia Association of Counties cc: I hereby certify that the foregoing is a adopted by the Roanoke County Board on Tuesday, November 18, 2003. true and correct copy of Resolution 111803-5 of Supervisors by a unanimous recorded vote Brenda J. H ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 4 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. C `~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 18, 2003 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution adopting a Legislative Program for the 2004 Session of the Virginia General Assembly, and petitioning the General Assembly to favorably consider the topics and issues addressed herein SUBMITTED BY: Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This resolution is based upon major legislative issues identified by the Board of Supervisors at its work session on October 28, 2003. It requests the Virginia General Assembly to consider these legislative issues during its 2004 session. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board consider the adoption of a legislative program for the 2004 session of the Virginia General Assembly for Roanoke County. ..~ ,; a AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2003 RESOLUTION ADOPTING A LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM FOR THE 2004 SESSION OF THE VIRGINIA GENERAL ASSEMBLY, AND PETITIONING THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY TO FAVORABLY CONSIDER THE TOPICS AND ISSUES ADDRESSED HEREIN WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, has identified major legislative issues of state-wide concern to be considered by the 2004 session of the Virginia General Assembly; and WHEREAS, the Board adopts this resolution as its Legislative Program for the 2004 session of the Virginia General Assembly. NOW, THEREFORE, Be It Resolved by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the following legislative initiatives are submitted for its legislative program for the 2004 session of the Virginia General Assembly for its favorable consideration and adoption. 1) Approve an amendment to the Roanoke County Charter as follows: Sec. 2.02 -Taxing powers. - In addition to the powers granted by other sections of the charter and general law, the county shall have the additional power to levy and collect taxes on cigarettes and tobacco products, pursuant to Section 58.1-3832 of the Code of Virginia. 2) Support the JLARC recommendations to address the shortfall in state funding for K-12 education and to fully fund the state Board of Education proposals. 1 f E-`I The estimated annual cost of funding both the JLARC recommendations and Board of Education proposals is $870 Million. 3) Support tax restructuring that grants localities additional revenue authority and increases local revenue diversification. 4) Support amending Sec. 15.2-1716 (reimbursement of expenses, DUI incidents) to increase the flat fee from $100 to $250, and to assess this fee as part of the court costs in the criminal/traffic proceedings. 5) Support additional state funding for transportation, and in particular, funding for improvements to I-81. 6) Support legislation that would fund the Smart Road project from statewide funds instead of from the Salem District. This project represents an economic benefit to the entire Commonwealth, therefore funding should not come solely from this region's highway allocation. 7) Oppose revisions to a merged state/local telecommunications tax that would be collected by the state and redistributed back to localities; oppose telecommunications tax reform that is not part of a comprehensive tax restructuring program; oppose efforts to reduce the amount or control of local governments over the E-911 tax. 8) Oppose the proposal to impose a state surcharge on tipping fees for each ton of solid waste received by any municipal solid waste disposal facility, or a state surcharge on water usage. 2 A c C- `f 9) Support amending Section 9.1-106 to allow Roanoke County to charge a processing fee in criminal or traffic proceedings to support a criminal justice training academy. That the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors is directed to send a certified copy of this resolution to Senator John S. Edwards, Senator Brandon Bell, Delegate H. Morgan Griffith, Delegate Onzlee Ware, Delegate William Fralin; Mary F. Parker, Roanoke City Clerk; Members of the Roanoke City Council; Forest Jones, Clerk for Salem City Council; Members of the Salem City Council; Clerk for the Town of Vinton; Members of the Vinton Town Council and the Roanoke Valley-Alleghany Regional Commission, and the Virginia Association of Counties. 3 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. F ~ - o~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 18, 2003 AGENDA ITEM: Requests for public hearing and first reading for rezoning ordinances - consentagenda SUBMITTED BY: Janet Scheid Chief Planner APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge ~~~ County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: The first reading on these ordinances is accomplished by adoption of these ordinances in the manner of consent agenda items. The adoption of these items does not imply approval of the substantive content of the requested zoning actions; rather, approval satisfies the procedural requirements of the County Charter and schedules the required public hearing and second reading of these ordinances. The second reading and public hearing on these ordinances is scheduled for December 16, 2003. The titles of these ordinances are as follows: 1. The petition of Cellco Partnership to obtain a special use permit to operate a telecommunication facility and broadcasting tower on 3.059 acres located at 6720 Thirlane Road, Catawba Magisterial District 2. The petition of Berk, LLC to obtain a special use permit to construct a mini warehouse facility on 4.0 acres located in the 5300 Block of Hollins Road, Hollins Magisterial District. Maps are attached. More detailed information is available in the Clerk's Office. ~ "~ STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: 1. That the Board approve and adopt the first reading of these rezoning ordinances for the purpose of scheduling the second reading and public hearing for December 16, 2003. 2. That this section of the agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth as Items 1-2, and that the Clerk is authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this action. 2 r...- c+.-FF 7 Two llr.ly i~ -) t;ounty of xoanoKe ~ ~- ~°---- --~- --~ Community Development Date received: Received by: & Zoning Plannin g ' Application fee: PC/BZA date: 5204 Bernard Drive P O Box 29800 Placards issued: BOS date: VA 24018-0798 Roanoke , (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 Case Number ,, ~ ALL APPLICANTS Check type of application filed (check all that apply) ©Rezoning X Special Use ©Variance ©Waiver ©Administrative Appeal Phone: (8041 347-2572 Applicants name/address w/zip (so4) 329-1039 (551) Cellco Partnership Work: 180 Washington Valley Road Cell #~ (8041 347-2572 Bedminster, New Jersey 07921 Fax No.: (8041 321-0398 Owner's name/address w/zip Phone #: (540) 362-1918 Preferred Leasing Company Work: (540) 362-1918 6720 Thirlane Road Fax No. #: (540) 362-1625 Roanoke, Virginia 24019 Property Location Magisterial District: Catawba 6720 Thirlane Road Roanoke, Virginia 24019 Community Planning area: Hollins Tax Map No.: part of 37.10 - 01 - 04 Existing Zoning: C2 Size of parcel(s): Acres:3.059 Acres upon subdivision Existing Land Use: Unimproved Parcel REZONING SPECIAL USE PERMITAND WAIVER APPLICANTS (R/S/~ Proposed Zoning: N / A Proposed Land Use: Operation of a telecommunication facility -Small Metropolitan Switching Center & Tower Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes X No IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes X No IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes No VAR.I,9_NCE, YVAIVER AND ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL APPLICANTS (VfW/AA) Variance/Waiver of Section(s) N / A of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to Appeal of Interpretation of Section(s): of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to r,r,r ri-+ ~ mri'-~T 77777 T lUnm RF a f'('`FPT`F.T) TF ANY OF TII] ;SE 1$ ttte app11C3I1OI1 (iU111111G1G: rlcaoc cuccn a a.uciv~cu. ~. a ..~..-___-~-- ~ • • -- ITEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. R/S/W V/AA R/S/W V/AA R/S/W V/AA X Consultation x 8 1/2" x 11" concept plan Application fee X Application X Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable X Justification X Water and sewer application X Adjoining property owners I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the Irnowledge and consent of the owner. See Attached Authorization Letter Owner's Signature 2 CONCEPT PLAN CHECKLIST A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County permitting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, waiver and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request. The County Planning Division staff may exempt some of the items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the following are considered minimum: ALL APPLICANTS ~/ a. Applicant name and name of development / b. Date, scale and north arrow / c. Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions / d. Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties ~/' e. Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. / f. The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties / g. All property lines and easements ,/ h. All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights /~ i. Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development j. Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces Additional information required for REZONING and SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANTS k. Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site / 1. Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers / m. Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals _/ n. Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections / o. Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants / p. Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed / q. If project is to be phased, please show phase schedule I certify that all items required in the checklist above are complete. • d-a:.~ Signature of applicant 10-24-03 Date 6 1 JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONING, SPECIAL U5E PERMIT OR WAIVER REQUEST ` Applicant: Cellco Partnership The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit or waiver requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. -~ Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. Applicant proposes to construct a telecommunications facility on a three (3) acre site zoned C-2 (General Commercial District) and located on Thirlane Road in Roanoke County. The site will be created through the subdivision of a larger tract. The facility will be comprised of a small metropolitan switch center and a 127-foot broadcasting ~~ tower. The C-2 district was created to provide sites for a variety of commercial and service related activities serving large areas of the county. Land uses permitted in this district include "communication services" which is defined in the Roanoke County Code to include, among other things, telecommunication service centers. Since Applicant's facility also includes a broadcasting tower, a special use permit is required. The facility will replace Applicant's current cell site and microwave hub located at 5228 Valley Pointe Parkway in Roanoke County. The proposed 17,000 square foot facility will house vanous wireless telephone microwave and network equipment and will be manned initially by approximately six network employees. The facility will further the purposes of the designated zoning classification by providing improved and expanded wireless communication services to a large geographical area, including Roanoke County, Roanoke City, Salem City and neighboring counties. A coverage map showing the areas that would be served is attached hereto as Exhibit "A". The facility will be located in close proximity to the I-581 corridor, a major arterial thoroughfare. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies - contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. The comprehensive development plan for C-2 districts permits a wide variety of service- related uses designed to enhance the quality of life for residents of the county. The proposed facility will increase the service coverage area and enhance existing wireless communication services in the Roanoke Valley. The existing facility is inadequate to meet the growing and expanding needs of the business and residential communities throughout the Roanoke Valley. Pursuant to its proposal, Applicant will also construct a 127-foot monopole broadcasting tower which has been approved by the Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA"). A copy of the FAA Determination Letter dated October 8, 2003 is attached hereto as Exhibit ""B". The new tower will replace Applicant's existing antenna site located at its current facility at Valley Pointe Office Park. r'1 LJ ~-i The tower and telecommunications facility will meet the design guidelines • prescribed under the Community Plan and the more stringent standards set forth in Section 30-87-2 of the Roanoke County Code. The proposed facility will promote the Plan's goal by providing quality development of an unimproved site. The proposed site will be developed in a manner that will be harmonious with its surroundings and result in a significant improvement in its general appearance. The facility will be constructed in conformity with adjacent commercial properties. The facility will provide necessary network connections to Verizon Wireless cell sites and switch facilities in and outside of Virginia. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. The proposed facility will have limited impact on the surrounding community and adjacent properties. Both commercial and residential communities surround the site. Northside High School is located to the west of the property but is buffered by an open field bordered by trees and foliage. A map of the site location prepared by Engineering Concepts, Inc. is attached hereto as Exhibit "C". Photographs of the existing site with comparison shots depicting the proposed 127' tower from various viewpoints around the property are attached hereto as Exhibit "D". The first phase of the facility will be comprised of a one-story building containing approximately 17,000 square feet. • Applicant will have the option to expand its facilities, as need dictates. Access will be provided from Thirlane Road, a county maintained road. Adequate public utilities, including sewer, water, and electric are already available at the site. The site is located in close proximity to the I-581 corridor and is accessible by fire and rescue services. Initially, Applicant intends to operate the new facility with a maximum of six network employees. The minimal labor force will not adversely affect vehicular or pedestrian traffic in or around this area. Directional lighting will be installed so as not to disturb or affect neighboring properties. The facility will house an emergency generator containing a hospital grade muffler to minimize noise. The site will also be adequately landscaped and screened to provide compatibility and harmony with adjacent properties. The proposed use will not impede or otherwise interfere with the future development of the surrounding properties. Since the facility will be a part of the Verizon Wireless telecommunications network, Applicant will have sole responsibility and control over all safety and security issues pertaining to the facility and the property. The impact on public services and facilities will be minimal due to the nature and size of the facility and the limited number of employees working at any given time. 1553 -03\VerizonUustificationRezoning(Final) • ~v-.~ .~ ~~' ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING CELLCO PARTNERSHIP' S APPLICATION ' • FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR BROADCASTING TOWER ~~! The following information is provided by the Applicant to address the additional requirements set forth in Sections 30-87-2 (C)(2) and (D) of the Roanoke County Code: ~, 1. Alternate Tower Sites. Applicant currently leases space from Liberty Properties for its broadcasting tower located on 5228 Valleypointe Parkway in Roanoke County, Virginia. For various reasons discussed elsewhere in this application, Applicant wants to relocate its ~', broadcasting facility and to construct a new small metropolitan switch center on a wholly owned site. Applicant initially targeted 4 separate sites located in Roanoke County to relocate its facilities. Due to the nature of the facility, the type of operation conducted by Applicant and the limited number of available properties in the market area, Applicant narrowed its search to the following 4 sites: a) 5162 Valleypointe Parkway. b) 9.53 Acre site in the 7300 block of Williamson Road. c) 6720 Thirlane Road. d) Wood Haven Road Site. Following an extensive 3 year investigation process on the subject sites, Applicant determined that the site located at 6720 Thirlane Road was the only feasible alternative. This determination was based upon the following facts: (i) The 5162 Valleypointe Parkway site was rejected due to the proximity to the • airport. The stringent height restrictions necessitated by the airport's flight paths preclude Applicant from constructing a tower sufficient to meet its operational needs. In addition, the commercial development encompassing this particular location is currently subject to a negative covenant prohibiting the construction of any tower. (ii) The Williamson Road site was also rejected due primarily to the flight path restrictions mentioned above. In addition, this site would not provide the coverage area needed for Applicant's operational needs and would require the placement of an additional tower along the I-581 corridor to maintain current services. (iii) The Wood Haven Road site was rejected due to the proximity to the airport and concomitant height restrictions on the tower. See Exhibit "E" -Roanoke County Sites ~' 2. Collocation Sites. Applicant did not consider collocating on any existing tower sites due to the following factors: (i) the security concerns associated with the operation of a small metropolitan switch center; (ii) the need to control access to the facility and equipment; (iii) the ability to expand its telecommunication services and/or coverage area as future needs dictate, (iv) the uniqueness of the switch center facility in providing and controlling necessary network connections to other cell sites and switch center facilities systemwide; (v) the need to operate and maintain a proprietary tower to serve Verizon Wireless and its subsidiaries in providing network • connections systemwide; (vi) the ability to regulate and control elevation levels of its antennae ~- i i i~ J 0 i~ 0 r n n t r• and microwave dishes to maintain optimal signal strength; and (vii) the lack of viable broadcast towers in the vicinity due, in part, to the proximity to the airport. Applicant's security guidelines require strict access to the facility and precludes the use of the facility by any party not part of the Verizon Wifeless system. This is one of the main reasons Applicant is relocating from its existing facility since it is leased and access cannot be controlled. 3. Photographic Simulations. Photographic simulations showing the relationship of the proposed broadcasting tower and associated antennae and microwave dishes to the surrounding community have been attached to the application as Exhibit "D" to which reference is hereby made. 4. Terrain & View-shed Analysis. A computerized terrain analysis showing the visibility of the tower and associated antennae and microwave dishes is attached hereto as Exhibit "F" to which reference is hereby made. 5. Coordination with Existing Communication System. In the first phase of construction, Applicant will construct a switch center containing approximately 17,000 square feet and a 127' monopole tower. The facility will be a regional hub for the Verizon Wireless network and will replace an existing microwave hub site located at Valley Pointe Office Park. The new facility will allow Applicant to: (i) expand its existing telecommunications equipment; (ii) provide for redundancy in its networking system; (iii) meet the needs of the expanding residential and commercial markets; and (iv) provide the necessary network connections to Verizon Wireless' cell cites and switch facilities in and outside of the Commonwealth of Virginia. This connection will be accomplished through a combination of the equipment provided at the new facility, Verizon Wireless' privately owned microwave network, and existing landline telephone companies, such as Verizon Communications and Cox Communications. A radio frequency transmission design report is attached hereto as Exhibit "G". 6. Balloon Test. An on-site "balloon" or comparable test will be conducted at the site and all relevant data from the test will be reported at the scheduled hearing date. 7. FAA Approval. Attached hereto as Exhibit "B" is a letter dated October 8, 2003 from the Federal Aviation Administration approving the construction of an antenna tower 127 feet above ground level. 8. Tower Height. Applicant intends to construct an FAA approved 127 foot monopole tower at the site which is well within the 199 foot maximum height restriction promulgated under the Roanoke County Code and well below Applicant's standard 250 foot tower. 9. Construction Reckuirements. The proposed design and specifications for the construction of the facility and tower will meet all code requirements, including the more stringent requirements set forth in Section 30-87-2(D) of the Roanoke County Code. The monopole tower will be a galvanized, non-reflective steel structure. The panel and microwave antenna attachments will be as depicted by the cut sheets within Exhibit "H". The microwave dishes will be 4 and 6 foot diameter attachments that spiral down the tower at various mounting heights and directional angles (also see Exhibit "G"). 0 ~. 10. Environmental Impact. The proposed facility and tower will be located off an . existing public road and will be in close proximity to a major arterial highway. The site also has sufficient utilities to service all operational needs. The visibility of the tower from the surrounding community will be minimal due to the limited height of the tower; the construction materials used; the other buildings in the area; the existing buffer provided by the trees and foliage in and around the property; and the additional proposed screening that will be unplemented. The site design provides for sufficient buffering and screening to minimize the visual impact of the facility in the surrounding neighborhoods. There will be minimal impact on existing roads and utilities in this area since the facility will be manned initially by no more than six (6) employees. Noise pollution will be minimal due to the use of a hospital grade muffler for the emergency generator that will be installed. 11. Collocation Policy. Although Applicant normally supports and participates with others in collocating communication equipment, the proposed facility is unique in that it will be a regional telecommunications hub for the Verizon Wireless network. This will not be the standard "for lease" tower facility since Applicant will build, own and operate a regional facility in conjunction with its tower. To provide the necessary network connections for and to secure the significant amount of proprietary data and voice traffic routed on its system, Applicant must maintain sole control and access to the tower. However, the tower will be available for collocation by Applicant's affiliates and subsidiaries. The tower will also allow Applicant to provide for redundancy in its communications network through its microwave dishes and landlines. If the current microwave hub were to go off line for any reason, Applicant would be incapable of providing a secondary or backup communication system. In addition, the limitations placed on the height of the tower by FAA and the number of antennae and microwave dishes to be installed by Applicant do not allow for any third party collocation since Applicant needs the • ability to expand as the market dictates. Initially, Applicant intends to install 12 panel antennae and up to nine microwave dishes on the tower. The proprietary nature of this facility is also critical for providing secure and unimpeded communications during natural disasters and other emergencies. 12. Lightins?. The referenced FAA Determination Letter requires the Applicant to provide a limited amount of lighting for the tower due to its proximity to the airport. The lighting is minimal and should not adversely affect the surrounding neighborhoods. lu,'~ C r, 0 D • rrs\VerizonlThirlaneAddirionallnfo-Final «, . mrv .e cr~~z,~R SERVICE RE~ : u. . ., APPT IcANT INFS2RM~T.I4L`~ M. .. " DATE: L D Iz~ C o~ _ {Please Type or Print) T: G~1 lGo ~a~~,neu~sln~~ ADDRESS: l ~o V~la~~~ ~n~-~-o-^ ~la~le'~ ~.aac~ - ' QyQ~ICAN ~ Vfs-zo'ti ~,~1-~ ,e 5 -34~_~5-12 _ ~~d,M-~s~e~', ~1e~ er`~P°~ ~'j~21 PHONE: ~~' ~~ ~,,,,~~, ~5 A pelt ~a ~-E-F' ADDRESS: OWNER: PRUNE: AGENT: ~ ~ ~~- ~i ~~"~ ~„sooc~ ADDRESS: ~,,~R~ueeriuGj Co,,ccc(~t~+, ~v~c PHONE: ~i 4~- d-~3 - l25 ,p~ fox Lq ~~v~cast l~-, ~t~r~ i ~ is 24-o9.a cT~r~ TNFnRNSATION DEVELOPMENT NAME: `J,nnal~ l'~le~s'° D~t~`dv~ ~w ~-~~^~~^5 ~~'~~' l LOCATION (FURNISH COPY OF MAP): `gee la -,~ - (off 7,0 `~ ~rl~~~e TAX MAP NO.: '1. I D - l - Z-~r subd~v . L2. TOTAL UNITS: __ ~ ____ TOTAL LOTS: 1- ~~~-i3 ~EAGE: 3• o5g ZONED. ^_____- 1.'t 1rot-a- ~~U'FSTED~Y~C.E-S_ WELL: WATER FACILITIES: COUNTY: SEPTIC SYSTEM: SEWER FACILITIES: COUNTY: IS BUILDING TO BE SPRINKLED? E ~ .FLOW REQUIRED? ~ b~ G.P.M. SCRIPTION OF WORK (Include any Specific Questions): DE 2S I~Sa~-~' ~~su r ~~ -~'o s' S w~.C ~ r1.o,,,,~.,>.,~d ~31 ~"~ ~ ~~ , ~, ~~~~ecl -~~ ~e -~'o ~ ~ .¢~w~ p~,.2 c~ ~ kl~~ Ga v~e ~ra~~ 2 ~ G D 'emu` t,~ ~ti-`~ Vc° y ~ trt~J S ~ e~ -C ~ D c~ . IGNATURE OF APPLICANT * APPLICATION MUST BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY BEFORE IT CAN BE PROCESSED. ROANOKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Applicants name: Cellco Partnership company Zoning: Rezoning From C2 to Special Use Tax Map No. 37.10-1-4 - • County of Raanoke Community Development Planning & Zoning • 5204 Bernard Drive P 0 Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018- 0798 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 For Staff Use Onl Date received: Received by: a Application fee: PCBZA date: ~ is Placazds issued: BOS date: 1. Case Number ~ ~ .._ , ~ - -~-- ALL APPLICANTS., Check type of applicat' filed (check all that apply) ^ Rezoning Special Use ^ Variance ^ Waiver ^ Administrative Appeal Applicants name/address w/zip Phone: 800-782-9731 Berk, LLC Work: Po Box aoo Cell #: Cloverdale, VA 24077 Fax No.: 540-992-3007 Owner's name/address w/zin Phone #: Berk, LLC Work: Po Box 40o Fax No. #: Cloverdale, VA 24077 Property Location Magisterial District: Hollins 5300 Bl k H lli Rd - oc o ns Community Planning area: Tax Map No.: 39.05-02-01.01 Existing Zoning: IZ ize of parcel(s): Acres: 4.0 Existing Land Use: Vacant REZONING SPECL9L ZISE PERMITAND WAIVER APPLICANTS (R/S/~ Proposed Zoning: I2 with SUP Proposed Land Use: Mini-warehouse Does the cel meet the minimum lot azea, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? ~ Yes No ^ IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes ^ No ^ IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes ^ No ^ VARL4NCE, WAIVER AND ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL APPLICANTS (i~/W/AA) Variance/Waiver of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to ~,~~ ° Appeal of Interpretation of Section(s): of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance ~ ~~ Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to Is the application complete? Please check ifenclosed- APPLICATION WII..L NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE TTE MS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. R/S/W V/AA R/SIW V/AA R/S/W V/AA Consultation 8 1/2" x 11" concept plan Application fee Application Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable Justification Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners ereby certify that I am either the owner of the rty or the owner' con ct purchaser and am acting with the knowledge and consent of the owner. ~ ~ L O ' i _ - wner s Signature 2 JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT OR WAIVER REQUEST Applicant Berk LLC ~ ~""" '"~'" ,, • The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit or waiver requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. As stated in the Roanoke County Ordinance (Section 30-62-1), the purpose of the I-2 zone is to provide locations within urbanized areas suitable for more intensive industrial uses. The proposed usage of the parcel is for mini warehouse storage. This facility will serve urban areas and, therefore, needs a convenient location. The site's access to Hollins Road as well as the surrounding neighborhoods, facilitates the transportation and storage activities that the site will produce. Due to the location of the site, the proposed use(s) will not add significantly to traffic congestion or large vehicles in more densely developed areas. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. The proposed project will provide rental storage space, thereby providing many of the residents of the County with a more convenient location to store excess materials or valuables. It also provides County with more tax income without imposing a significant burden on County infrastructure. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. The owner's goal is to develop the 3.28 acre site into a mini storage facility. The development will increase the existing property value. The proposed entrance to the development will be designed to accommodate the impending widening of Hollins Road. The development will slightly increase traffic on Hollins Road, adding a maximum of 129 average daily trips on Saturdays (peak daily generator). Public sewer and water impacts will be nominal; the estimated water demand is 400 gpd. Public water and sanitary sewer lines are accessible from the property. The effect on power supply in the area will also be nominal. The proposed development will have minimal effect on schools and fire and rescue services. Erosion and Sediment Control measures will be provided to mitigate impacts on downstream properties. The existing drainage channel and depression on the property will be an ideal location for stormwater management. The proposed use for this site does not produce significant noise or air pollution as is the potential for other industrial sites. 3 I CONCEPT PLAN CHECKLIST I A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County permitting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan maybe altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, waiver and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request. The County Planning Division staffmay exempt some of the items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the following are considered minimum: AL~PPLICANTS 4 a. Applicant name and name of development V b. Date, scale and north arrow c. Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions ~/ d. Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties V / e. Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. i/ f. The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties g. All property lines and easements • / h. All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights i. Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development C.~ j. Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces Additional information required for REZONING and SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANTS V ~k. Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site f/ 1. Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers _~/m. Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals V n. Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections o. Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants // p. Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed '~/ q. If project is to be phased, please show phase schedule I c that all items re wired ' C Signature of applicant above are complete. Date 7 __ OVOa SNIIIOH ~ I t -~ ' i~ - \ ~~' 200' DECELER~N LANE `" I ~ ~ ~ ~~ , (P -~ \ - ,, - - - - - --~i~-- ' ~ i ~ o l ; ii `,~ ~ ~ I ~ ,, ~k ~~~ -- -~- { i ` ~av 1N3W39VNVW ~ / ~ - n ~,~`- ~ I "~ a31VMWa01S „~ ~ ~ X90 ~??, ~ ~ 1 l- ~ m ~ - _ .-_. iti , - ~1 \`{(I - .. - _- 41 . ~ I ___-_ _ ~ _ 1 y11y ~l (-" -- _._ _ __ ___ - ~ __ . ~ ~ _ 1 t ~ ; , ` 3DVaols na ~a3MOi o 0 L O Z ~ ~ -- ~ -~ x ~ ,~, = ~ - - ~ddn o ~ _ ___ -- -- - ~ -~ -__- ~ _ _ - - _ 4' z , I~ ~ , - - -- - - -- ------- sl~Nn ,o~x,ob -~ -- - ___- O O A 'I r ~ _ ~- _.. -. - -- - ... . -- _ --- -----_ to _ - -.. , oao ._ . --- - _ ~- - 'o i _____ __ _____ _ _____ _______ -_______ ._J D ~ ~- _ r______________.___________.__ ._______________ ' ___- ---_Q____ ..____ ~- ,-_ r ,- ------------------- --- ------------~ ~------X------_ ., HOLLINS RD- ~ m -G C7 D p Z w l> O Z I(Ti ~ D y.+ m z r D ~ o=+~~~ ~ v ° ~ a1o n~~ T oh oo z ~ ~ Z N z ma m~ m o '.S~ ~ m Nam i ~ nrtJ c~ ...r -i Z , a'OD w3D m 4 m 3~~ b O ~ pN O v-n~ ~ ~ a p - fnn tnn f t X X X o~ D po $m g~ m 2 f N Ni -N w O iT O p _ GZ7 i:Zi LZ] ~ m ~ A ~ ~ Y m E to v ,~ ~ ~~ ~m n O ,ate` $ m D N Z - -i ( n r ~D a z ~ Z m m V1 ' N $ T ~ A Z N O s D ~ ~y a~v~~,~ a ~ < = CONCEPTUAL LAYOUT "^ ~~ ~ ~ MINI WAREHDUSEFACILITYFOR ~.~ ~ 4o BERK, LLC o ~ ~ o ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Om0 m~r~ m K yD~y~r77~ AND D~ ~T N N ~ N Nam uJ T -~ , , D ~ -n rmii~0 ~Tp m o "' N~Z D ~ (p NNO ~7m~ Crl ~ O ~ ~ C m -_~ N wm N ~ ~ V No C z V D m N -i~~~~~~ p ..~....JV ~ . -ammmm~2 ~~~~~~o p ~ N T m~o~g~~ ~ r T PROI/I,QENCE X09 Z TZ7 _ ~ mNm~m~ vv-o wp 5~~~~p Z g O~ p N Ni?rt'7p gg-Nn ~ ur ~n EONSULTING ENGINEERS 819 Naff Road goones Mlil, Vlrglnia 24065 64Ema114 Providence@metwood3com293 v m ~ 3 r W ?Z~ °~ mm no ~ o oz p~rcir ~m~77o =~N YO O -n--. V7 < caw mm mmm °mb ~Nmo fOm -~ Z o u x Z ro ur v . O ~ d~ O ~ ~ ~~ N Z m ~ ~ m ~m7 ~ 3 ~ ~ Q r lD a D ~ XZ z "' O 'U ~~ a~ r I o n N i O O i 0 0 ~a n P C ROANOKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT F ' ~.. Applicants Name: Berk, LLC Zoning: Rezoning From I2 TO Special Use Tax Map No. 39.05-2-1.1 3 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~I AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 18, 2003 AGENDA ITEM: Appointments to Committees, Commissions and Boards SUBMITTED BY: Diane S. Childers Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: 1. BLUE RIDGE BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE The three-year terms of Dan O'Donnell to complete the unexpired portion of Gary Kelly's term, and John M. Hudgins, Jr., member at large, will expire on December 31, 2003. The member at large must be confirmed by the Cities of Roanoke and Salem. Ms. S. James Sikkema, Executive Director, Blue Ridge Behavioral Healthcare, has recommended that Mr. O'Donnell be reappointed and that Mr. Hudgins' appointment be ratified. 2. GRIEVANCE PANEL The three-year terms of King Harvey and Karen Ewell, alternate members, expired on October 28, 2003. 3. LIBRARY BOARD (Appointed by District) The four-year term of Josie Eyer, Catawba District, will expire on December 31, 2003. The four-year term of Sheryl L. Ricci, Windsor Hills District, who was completing the unexpired portion of David R. Smith's term, will expire on December 31, 2003. -~ .--.. A 4. ROANOKE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (Appointed by District) The four-year terms of William Todd Ross, Hollins District, and Donald R. Witt, Cave Spring District, will expire on December 31, 2003. 5. ROANOKE VALLEY RESOURCE AUTHORITY The four-year term of Anne Marie Green, Director, General Services, will expire on December 31, 2003. 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2003 RESOLUTION 111803-6 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM J -CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for November 18, 2003, designated as Item J -Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 8, inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of minutes -October 17, 2003 2. Request from schools to accept and appropriate student achievement grant funds in the amount of $12,179 for fiscal year 2004 3. Request from schools to appropriate funds in the amount of $115,397 for student laptop fees 4. Request from schools to accept and appropriate drug-free communities grant in the amount of $99,956 from the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 5. Request to accept Roselawn Court into the State Secondary System 6. Resolution authorizing the application, acceptance and appropriation of grants in the amount of $227,527 from the Office of Domestic Preparedness State Homeland Security Grant Program for the cost associated with terrorism related preparedness and response 7. Request to accept and appropriate Section 5311 grant monies totaling $122,888 from the Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation on behalf of Unified Human Transportation Services Inc. for the CORTRAN Program 8. Request to approve the donation of certain real estate for entrance improvements to the Vinton Business Center from Charles Dewey Mitchell, Vinton Magisterial District 1 r A 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES : Supervisors Flora, Church, Minnix, Altizer, McNamara NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Diane S. Childers Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Lorraine Lange, Assistant Superintendent of Instruction Dr. Linda Weber, School Superintendent Brenda Chastain, Clerk, School Board Rebecca Owens, Director, Finance Penny Hodge, CPA, Director, Budget & Finance JoAnn Burkholder, Student Assistant Administrator Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Richard Burch, Chief of Fire & Rescue John Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator Paul Mahoney, County Attorney William Driver, Director, Real Estate Valuation 2 .. ~. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2003 RESOLUTION APPROVING -AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM J -CONSENT AGENDA ~~-Q BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for November 18, 2003 designated as Item J -Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 8, inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of minutes -October 17, 2003 2. Request from schools to accept and appropriate student achievement grant funds in the amount of $12,179 for fiscal year 2004 3. Request from schools to appropriate funds in the amount of $115,397 for student laptop fees 4. Request from schools to accept and appropriate drug-free communities grant in the amount of $99,956 from the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention 5. Request to accept Roselawn Court into the State Secondary System 6. Resolution authorizing the application, acceptance and appropriation of grants in the amount of $227,527 from the Office of Domestic Preparedness State Homeland Security Grant Program for the cost associated with terrorism related preparedness and response 7. Request to accept and appropriate Section 5311 grant monies totaling $122,888 from the Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation on behalf of Unified Human Transportation Services Inc. for the CORTRAN Program 8. Request to approve the donation of certain real estate for entrance improvements to the Vinton Business Center from Charles Dewey Mitchell, Vinton Magisterial District 1 ~, ,3 That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required bylaw to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. 2 -* ACTION NO. A-111803-6.a ITEM NO. J-2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 18, 2003 AGENDA ITEM: Request from schools to accept and appropriate student achievement grant funds in the amount of $12,179 for fiscal year 2004 SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: Lorraine S. Lange Assistant Superintendent of Instruction Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The state appropriation act for fiscal year 2004 authorized the transfer of money from the dropout prevention program to programs where schools can choose how to use the money. Roanoke County will receive $103,010, of which $90,831 was already included in the General Fund. The general fund should be increased by $12,179 to account 732020-1121. FISCAL IMPACT: There will be an additional appropriation of $12,179 for the student achievement grant. ALTERNATIVES: None STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance and appropriation of $12,179 student achievement grant funds to be included in the General Fund. 1 VOTE: Supervisor Minnix motion to approve staff recommendation Motion Approved Yes No Abs Mr. Flora ® ^ ^ Mr. Church ® ^ ^ Mr. Minnix ® ^ ^ Mr. Altizer ® ^ ^ Mr. McNamara ® ^ ^ cc: File Lorraine Lange, Assistant Superintendent of Instruction Dr. Linda Weber, School Superintendent Brenda Chastain, Clerk, School Board Rebecca Owens, Director, Finance 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. S--c~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: November 18, 2003 Request from schools to accept and appropriate student achievement grant funds in the amount of $12,179 for fiscal year 2004 Lorraine S. Lange Assistant Superintendent of Instruction Elmer C. Hodge ~~ County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The state appropriation act for fiscal year 2004 authorized the transfer of money from the dropout prevention program to programs where schools can choose how to use the money. Roanoke County will receive $103,010, of which $90,831 was already included in the General Fund. The general fund should be increased by $12,179 to account 732020-1121. FISCAL IMPACT: There will be an additional appropriation of $12,179 for the student achievement grant. ALTERNATIVES: None STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance and appropriation of $12,179 student achievement grant funds to be included in the General Fund. ACTION NO. A-111803-6.b ITEM NO. J-3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 18, 2003 AGENDA ITEM: Appropriation of Student Laptop Fees SUBMITTED BY: Penny Hodge, CPA Director, Budget and Finance APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Laptop Initiative, piloted in fiscal year 2002-2003 and implemented in fiscal year 2003- 2004, provides a laptop computer to all Roanoke County School 9'h graders for use in school and at home. The cost to the students for participating in the program this year is $85. The student fee will be used to self-insure the laptop computers, purchase a carrying bag, and fund parts, batteries, paper and toner for the laptop program. The warranty on the laptop computers covers repairs for 4 years. Students are responsible for deductibles under the Dell warranty. The laptop computers also include the Dell Computrace feature which can trace missing computers and notify law enforcement. The combination of these features should significantly reduce the risk to the school system for damaged or stolen laptop computers. FISCAL IMPACT: The cost to insure the laptops has been quoted at approximately $40 per unit. By reserving this portion of the student fee, the school system could replace up to 43 stolen laptop computers in fiscal year 2003-2004, if not recovered by the security tracking feature. A portion of the annual student fee will continue to be reserved for future losses as the program is rolled out to the remaining high school grades. The student fee will be allocated as follows: Self-funded insurance reserve 878000-8603 $55,040 Minor equipment re lacement 878000-6505 6,095 Bas 878000-5850 26,262 Supplies -toner, paper, cables 878000-6405 15,000 Small arts -Students 878000-6511 8,000 Small arts -teachers 878000-6512 5,000 Total expected student fees $115,397 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends appropriation of student fees of $115,397 to 878000-0439 for the uses outlined above in support of the laptop initiative. VOTE: Supervisor Minnix motion to approve staff recommendation Motion Approved Yes No Abs Mr. Flora ® ^ ^ Mr. Church ® ^ ^ Mr. Minnix ® ^ ^ Mr. Altizer ® ^ ^ Mr. McNamara ® ^ ^ cc: File Penny Hodge, CPA, Director, Budget & Finance Dr. Linda Weber, School Superintendent Brenda Chastain, Clerk, School Board Rebecca Owens, Director, Finance 2 r ~~ ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~ - AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 18, 2003 AGENDA ITEM: Appropriation of Student Laptop Fees SUBMITTED BY: Penny Hodge, CPA Director, Budget and Finance APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge ~ ~~ County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Laptop Initiative, piloted in fiscal year 2002-2003 and implemented in fiscal year 2003- 2004, provides a laptop computer to all Roanoke County School 9th graders for use in school and at home. The cost to the students for participating in the program this year is $85. The student fee will be used toself-insure the laptop computers, purchase a carrying bag, and fund parts, batteries, paper and toner for the laptop program. The warranty on the laptop computers covers repairs for 4 years. Students are responsible for deductibles under the Dell warranty. The laptop computers also include the Dell Computrace feature which can trace missing computers and notify law enforcement. The combination of these features should significantly reduce the risk to the school system for damaged or stolen laptop computers. FISCAL IMPACT: The cost to insure the laptops has been quoted at approximately $40 per unit. By reserving this portion of the student fee, the school system could replace up to 43 stolen laptop computers in fiscal year 2003-2004, if not recovered by the security tracking feature. A portion of the annual student fee will continue to be reserved for future losses as the program is rolled out to the remaining high school grades. The student fee will be allocated as follows: ,.~ .. Self-funded insurance reserve 878000-8603 $55,040 Minor equipment re lacement 878000-6505 6,095 Bas 878000-5850 26,262 Supplies -toner, paper, cables 878000-6405 15,000 Small arts -Students 878000-6511 8,000 Small arts -teachers 878000-6512 5,000 Total expected student fees $115,397 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends appropriation of student fees of $115,397 to 878000-0439 for the uses outlined above in support of the laptop initiative. i ACTION NO. A-111803-6.c ITEM NO. J-4 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 18, 2003 AGENDA ITEM: Request rom schools to accept and appropriate drug-free communi ies grant in the amount of $99,956 from the Office of Juvenile ustice and Delinquency Prevention SUBMITTED BY: JoAnn B rkholder Student ssistance Administrator APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County ministrator NTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMME SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: In March 2003, the Roanoke County drug-free communities grant from Prevention. This grant application E Roanoke County School Board and 1 the Council's efforts to prevent alcoh of Roanoke County. There were a from across the country, and Roanc Community/School Prevention Council applied for a the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency mbraces the March 2003 resolution adopted by the he Roanoke County Board of Supervisors supporting ~I, tobacco, and other substance use among the youth total of 582 drug-free community grant applications ke County was one of 183 award recipients. On October 2, 2003, representativ s from the offices of Congressman Boucher and Senator Allen announced Roanok County as the recipient of a $99,956 drug-free communities support program gran for the federal fiscal year 2003. The grant has the possibility of being renewed for up t five years. FISCAL IMPACT: Roanoke County schools serve as t e fiscal agent for the grant at a reimbursement of 5% ($5,000) of the grant funds. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends accept and appropriation of drug-free community grant funds in the amount of $99,956 from the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. VOTE: Supervisor Minnix motion to approve staff recommendation Motion Approved Yes No Abs Mr. Flora ® ^ ^ Mr. Church ® ^ ^ Mr. Minnix ® ^ ^ Mr. Altizer ® ^ ^ Mr. McNamara ® ^ ^ cc: File JoAnn Burkholder, Student Assistant Administrator Dr. Linda Weber, School Superintendent Brenda Chastain, Clerk, School Board Rebecca Owens, Director, Finance 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. J -~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 18, 2003 AGENDA ITEM: Request from schools to accept and appropriate drug-free communities grant in the amount of $99,956 from the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention SUBMITTED BY: JoAnn Burkholder Student Assistance Administrator APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge E'/f County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: In March 2003, the Roanoke County Community/School Prevention Council applied for a drug-free communities grant from the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. This grant application embraces the March 2003 resolution adopted by the Roanoke County School Board and the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors supporting the Council's efforts to prevent alcohol, tobacco, and other substance use among the youth of Roanoke County. There were a total of 582 drug-free community grant applications from across the country, and Roanoke County was one of 183 award recipients. On October 2, 2003, representatives from the offices of Congressman Boucher and Senator Allen announced Roanoke County as the recipient of a $99,956 drug-free communities support program grant for the federal fiscal year 2003. The grant has the possibility of being renewed for up to five years. FISCAL IMPACT: Roanoke County schools serve as the fiscal agent for the grant at a reimbursement of 5% ($5,000) of the grant funds. r ~. •. -- , J-~ STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends accept and appropriation of drug-free community grant funds in the amount of $99,956 from the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. r ~ THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, IN REGULAR MEETING ON THE 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2003, ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING: RESOLUTION 111803-6.d REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF ROSELAWN COURT INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM WHEREAS, the street described on the attached Addition Form SR-5(A), fully incorporated herein by reference are shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, and WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised this Board the streets meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation, WHEREAS, the County and the Virginia Department of Transportation have entered into an agreement on March 9, 1999 for comprehensive stormwater detention which applies to this request for addition, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(A) to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote Moved By: Supervisor Minnix Seconded By: None Required Yeas: Supervisors Flora, Church, Minnix, Altizer, McNamara Nays: None A Copy Teste: Diane S. Childers Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Department of Community Development Virginia Department of Transportation I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Resolution 111803-6.d adopted by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors by a unanimous recorded vote on November 18, 2003. Brenda J. Holt n, C C Deputy Clerk !'~J1 C O E t U q Q Q 3 O Q r 1 a L E .. ~ a e m ~ c o m ~ ~ ~ a_ 0 ~ 07 O O L d a ~ m Q ~ e ~ 5 LL. Y N t 0 -° ~ E ~ ~ Q < C 0 .D .II 7 `o m m Z en ti > O N ~ D .~C c 6 t Cn ~:: 02o U G:, ..;: 0 0 ~ s a ~ G c ~. 5 ~ U m 8 Z _~ 7 r d ~ ~~ `~ ~ c~- e a d e m a ~ o a° ~ ~° d e a a m u a d C~. ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~pp p o 44 O 0 0 0 5 a a v ! ~ 8 1 '9 t > N >- M ' ~ O ~ ° O ~ ~ ~ ~ e O a e D $ m O a O a p a Y `a FF a x o F b c Y 0 FF 0 p ~ FF a a e 8 F `a a c ~ a ~ e a ~ ~ c r 'a ~ c r ~ ~i r a S r d u. r d ~i r a u. r d ~ ( ~.J a y ~ F Z Q C Z ~y , ~ f N Q h' 0 Z O v r E 2 u: ~ ~ 4 $ +- 'o r ~ a O e 2 n O a U ;i v C n W U L U I C Y ~ i L z` REANDKE COUNTY rOSelawn court DEPARTMENT OF Acceptance of Roselawn Court into the Virginia Department C~MM.UNITY IIEVEL~PMENT of Tranportation Secondary System. ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~ -~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 18, 2003 AGENDA ITEM: Request to accept Roselawn Court into the State Secondary System SUBMITTED BY: Arnold Covey Director of Community Development APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge ~~" County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~~~~~...,~! SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: MRW Developers, L.L.C., developers of Roselawn Court, requests that the Board of Supervisors approve a resolution to the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) requesting that they accept 0.15 miles of Roselawn Court from its intersection with Route 689 (Roselawn Road) north to its cul-de-sac. Staff has inspected this road, along with representatives from VDOT, and finds the road acceptable. FISCAL IMPACT: No County funding is required. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve the resolution requesting that VDOT accept Roselawn Court into the State Secondary System 2. Do not approve the resolution and leave Roselawn Court as a private road. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the resolution accepting Roselawn Court into the State Secondary System. •• I J THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, IN REGULAR MEETING ON THE 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2003, ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING: RESOLUTION REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF ROSELAWN COURT INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM WHEREAS, the street described on the attached Addition Form SR-5(A), fully incorporated herein by reference are shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, and WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised this Board the streets meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation, WHEREAS, the County and the Virginia Department of Transportation have entered into an agreement on March 9, 1999 for comprehensive stormwater detention which applies to this request for addition, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets described on the attached Additions Form SR-5(A) to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote Moved by: Seconded by: _ Yeas: Nays: A Copy Teste: Diane S. Childers, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors pc: Arnold Covey, Director, Department of Community Development Virginia Department of Transportation File REANEKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT ~F COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT roselawn court Acceptance of Roselawn Court into the Virginia Department of Tranportation Secondary System. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2003 RESOLUTION 111803-6.e DESIGNATING THE APPLICANTS AGENT, THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE GRANT AND APPROPRIATION OF GRANT MONIES BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia that Elmer Hodge, County Administrator or his designee, is hereby authorized to execute for and in behalf of the Roanoke County, a public entity established under the laws of the State of Virginia, this application and to file it in the appropriate State Office for the purpose of obtaining certain Federal financial assistance under the ODP, State Homeland Security Grant Program(s), administered by the Commonwealth of Virginia. That, the Roanoke County, a public entity established under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia, hereby authorizes it agent to provide to the Commonwealth and to the Office of Domestic Preparedness (ODP) for all matters pertaining to such Federal financial assistance any and all information pertaining to these Grants as may be requested. FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County authorizes the acceptance of said grant monies in the amount of $227.527.00 and authorizes the appropriation of said monies for the purposes authorized in the grant application. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt this resolution and passed and approved this 18tH day of November, 2003 by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Flora, Church, Minnix, Altizer, McNamara NAYS: None cc: File Richard E. Burch Rebecca Owens, A COPY TESTE: Diane S. Childers Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Chief of Fire and Rescue Director of Finance CERTIFICATION hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of R-111803~.e adopted by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors by a unanimous recorded vote on Tuesday, November 18, 2003. Brenda J. H Iton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 18, 2003 AGENDA ITEM: Resolution authorizing the application, acceptance and appropriation of grant from the Office of Domestic Preparedness State Homeland Security Grant Program for the cost associated with terrorism related preparedness and response SUBMITTED BY: Richard E. Burch Chief of Fire and Rescue APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge ~.~rr~ ~'rv~i~-- County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~,.--o mo'w' SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Roanoke County has been advised that we have been approved for a grant through the Office of Domestic Preparedness State Homeland Security Grant Program administered by the Virginia Department of Emergency Management. The grant funds are to be used to fund equipment, supplies and administrative costs associated with terrorist activities and the response to weapons of mass destruction incidents. The monies must be used for only approved items in the grant program. 2003 Grant $227,527.00 Obligated by March 31, 2005 The grant does not require a local match and the application paperwork must have a certifying resolution attached. FISCAL IMPACT: The total of the grant is $227,527.00 and does not require any local match. The monies must be spent on qualified equipment and administrative expenses related to preparation for terrorism and weapons of mass destruction incidents. ~° STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of the attached resolution and authorizing that a certified copy accompany the grant application for the grant award. Staff also recommends the appropriation of the grant funds to the Fire and Rescue Department for the administration of the grant. ..-2 ACTION NO. A-111803-6.f ITEM NO. J-7 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 18, 2003 AGENDA ITEM: Request to accept and appropriate Section 5311 grant monies totaling $122,888 from the Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation on behalf of Unified Human Transportation Services Inc. for the CORTRAN Program SUBMITTED BY: John M. Chambliss, Jr. Assistant County Administrator APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: For the past few years, Unified Human Transportation Services, Inc., who operates the CORTRAN program on behalf of Roanoke County, has applied for and been awarded grants from the Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation. These grants help with capital costs and also provide some of the operating monies for the CORTRAN service for Roanoke County. The grant for FY 2003 - 2004 includes the following items: CAPITAL: Two Vans State Amt. $ 95,000 Local Amt. 5,000 Total $100,000 OPERATING: Operating monies for CORTRAN in the rural portion of the County State Amt. $ 22,888 The local match for these grant programs will be provided by Unified Human Transportation Services, Inc. This is apass-through grant where Roanoke County is the named agent on behalf of the CORTRAN program. ., FISCAL IMPACT: The County needs to accept and appropriate the above pass-through grant monies and forward them to Unified Human Transportation Services, Inc. They will be responsible for all administration efforts of this grant. The local match is provided by Unified Human Transportation Services, Inc. and no local monies are required. RECOMMENDATIONS: Accept and appropriate the two grants in the amounts of $100,000 for capital and $22,888 for operating monies from the Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation on behalf of Unified Human Transportation Services, Inc. No new local monies are required. VOTE: Supervisor Minnix motion to approve staff recommendation Motion Approved Yes No Abs Mr. Flora ® ^ ^ Mr. Church ® ^ ^ Mr. Minnix ® ^ ^ Mr. Altizer ® ^ ^ Mr. McNamara ® ^ ^ cc: File John Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator Rebecca Owens, Director, Finance 2 . R 1 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ,Z-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 18, 2003 AGENDA ITEM: Request to accept and appropriate Section 5311 grant monies totaling $122,888 from the Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation on behalf of Unified Human Transportation Services Inc. for the CORTRAN Program SUBMITTED BY: John M. Chambliss, Jr. Assistant County Administrator APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge ~ 17°'~ County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: ~ a~/~~,e,P SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: For the past few years, Unified Human Transportation Services, Inc., who operates the CORTRAN program on behalf of Roanoke County, has applied for and been awarded grants from the Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation. These grants help with capital costs and also provide some of the operating monies for the CORTRAN service for Roanoke County. The grant for FY 2003 - 2004 includes the following items: CAPITAL: Two Vans State Amt. $ 95,000 Local Amt. 5,000 Total $100,000 OPERATING: Operating monies for CORTRAN in the rural portion of the County State Amt. $ 22,888 The local match for these grant programs will be provided by Unified Human Transportation Services, Inc. This is apass-through grant where Roanoke County is the named agent on behalf of the CORTRAN program. ,~ J.a.~. _~ FISCAL IMPACT: The County needs to accept and appropriate the above pass-through grant monies and forward them to Unified Human Transportation Services, Inc. They will be responsible for all administration efforts of this grant. The local match is provided by Unified Human Transportation Services, Inc. and no local monies are required. RECOMMENDATIONS: Accept and appropriate the two grants in the amounts of $100,000 for capital and $22,888 for operating monies from the Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation on behalf of Unified Human Transportation Services, Inc. No new local monies are required. ACTION NO. A-111803-6.q ITEM NO. J-8 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 18, 2003 AGENDA ITEM: Acceptance of the donation of certain real estate for entrance improvements to the Vinton Business Center from Charles Dewey Mitchell, Vinton Magisterial District SUBMITTED BY: Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This consent agenda item involves the acceptance of the following real estate for entrance improvements to the Vinton Business Center in the Vinton Magisterial District conveyed to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. a) Donation of 0.099 acres, together with a temporary construction easement of 0.044 acres, from Charles Dewey Mitchell (DB1117, page 172); Tax Map No. 71.07-1-45 as shown on a plat prepared by Mattern & Craig, Inc. dated 12/6/01, revised 12/19/01. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of the donation of this real estate and that the County Administrator, or Assistant County Administrator, be authorized to execute such documents as may be necessary to accomplish this acceptance. 1 VOTE: Supervisor Minnix motion to approve staff recommendation Motion Approved Yes No Abs Mr. Flora ® ^ ^ Mr. Church ® ^ ^ Mr. Minnix ® ^ ^ Mr. Altizer ® ^ ^ Mr. McNamara ® ^ ^ cc: File Paul Mahoney, County Attorney William Driver, Director, Real Estate Valuation Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Doug Chittum, Director, Economic Development 2 ~-~ • ' , ,:.,~.. • ~ -- ~< ~z ®~ ~ +~- Chorfai Dswsy f~fltcheii N~ N '~ o O.B. 113 7, PG, t 72 ~ $ w Tax ~{ 71.07-01-45 M .2,565 Acrss (Died} ~ . ~ ~ _D noa brryi R1W~ 4S ~ ~: '~` 2.466 Acrsi (Ntt} ~ r~-a ~ •v m c 1 ~. ~ N Q r k EXISTING ~ :: ~ p e ~ DWELLING ~ U a h --_- v1 ihI ' u~r• o i ~ +^ c ,. c 1 .044 AC. ~~ > c 0 0.099 ~-C. ~~ Temporary } e '- 574.27'15'"E Consiructlon~~ o 13.99' roposed R~VV Proposed Eoaement ~= z 5844~5~ 16 E ~ 9W Lina ~ ~ , Sq 4'?"f r y ~1 ~ . ,. Y ~01~ . ~Y,''- ~ S6~a~'//~ ?~~p f ~ 1'5742 19 5..E ~ ~ . _,;,, _ ~ ~ _ I ~-11.aa' Hq Nes•a~° • a w~ gR~~AQ ~? ~ . ~ I~ t ~~S I ~~ Pq ~~ f~r ~ TDR vEE I , N OE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC IiNE „~ G TOWER POLE ,` ~ PROPERTY LINE RAW RIGHT OF WAY LINE SHADED AREA DENOTES STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY TO BE ACOUiRED. PERMANENT STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY AREA - x,301 S0. FT. (0.099 AC.) HATCHED AREA flENOTES TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT. ~~-~-~w.-TElutPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AREA - 1810 SQ. FT. (0.044 AC.) • }~~Ati~cx of `f~c ~O V DAMD A. PERFATER No. 1 B47 ~'~.~ X44 MATTERN do CRAtf}. [KC. 701 FIRST STREET e ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24016 TELEPHONE (540)3459342 STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT BEING GRANTED TO R®ANOKE COUNTY CHARLES ©E1NEY 1~~TCHELL ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA SCALE: i" ~ 40' REV: .12/19/01 DATE: DEC. 8, 2001 TAX N0, 71.a'?-o1-45 R:\SURVEY\14~SA\DwG\PtATS\71.07-81-45.DwC m ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ,j- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 18, 2003 AGENDA ITEM: Acceptance of the donation of certain real estate for entrance improvements to the Vinton Business Center from Charles Dewey Mitchell, Vinton Magisterial District SUBMITTED BY: Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This consent agenda item involves the acceptance of the following real estate for entrance improvements to the Vinton Business Center in the Vinton Magisterial District conveyed to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. a) Donation of 0.099 acres, together with a temporary construction easement of 0.044 acres, from Charles Dewey Mitchell (DB1117, page 172); Tax Map No. 71.07-1-45 as shown on a plat prepared by Mattern & Craig, Inc. dated 12/6/01, revised 12/19/01. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of the donation of this real estate and that the County Administrator, or Assistant County Administrator, be authorized to execute such documents as may be necessary to accomplish this acceptance. I \\ Y J t \ j \\ r~ ~ ~ w c \ f Q^+ ~./ ~o ~ Lei a+ ~~n ~ ^~ vm o Cr ~ ~ ~ e o ~ 0 0 1 574.27' 15"E z 0'099 } AC. - 9g` 13 roposed R~W . S8<•t8~16'E ..... o_ ~< a ~z Chortes Dewey Mitchell N~ 0.6. 1117, PG. 172 ~ ~ ~ rax ,~ 71.07-01-4s 2.565 Acres (Deed) _n nog Acres (R/W) 2.466 Acrse {Net) v ~ N t- i. EXISTING a «~ DWELLING ~ ~ i~ ~a O ~ !'oi~ ~^ c ~a .044 AC. ~~ > o 0 ~~ Temporaryry ~ o ~ Proposed C011StrtICTtOn ~~ z R/W Line Ecaement S69. o ~ -• S6~. ~'//~ ? gyp, t 570'47'25"E x9.10, ~~~~ ,~ I 1 42.19 f ~~ ` I i t X11.82' RA Gov R® ~ ~` ARofs qQ LE~Eb.Q OE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE b TOWER r~OLE PROPERTY LINE y t ~~~t I ~ Pq ~MENr + TDR VE `~.. ~ yy RIGHT DF WAY LINE ~~ SHADED AREA DENOTES STREET RIGHT-f}F-WAY TO BE ACOUtRED, PERMANENT STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY AREA - 4,301 SQ. fT. (0.099 AC.) HATCHED AREA DENOTES TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AREA - 1910 S0. F'T. (0.044 AC.) ~.(.F'~yTH OF `~~c STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY AND ~O • TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 'Z' 9EING GRANTED TO VDAVfD A. PERFATER> RpANOKE COUNTY No. 1847 DIY ~ CHARLES DEWEY MITCHELL sulN~'s~ R©ANOKE COUNTY, viRGINiA MATTERN ~. CRAIO, [KC. SCALE: 1" ~ 40' REV:.12/t9/01 701 FIRST STREET ""~ ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 240 i 6 DATE: DEC. 6. 2001 TELEPHONE (540)3459342 TAX N0. 71.07-Oi-45 R:\SURVEI'\ 19 S5A\DWG\PUTS\71.07-Q i -45.DWC x~ ~"°,~ r ACTION NO. ITEM NO. _~ - ~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 18, 2003 AGENDA ITEM: Request to schedule a joint work session with the Planning Commission on December 16, 2003 to discuss the Comprehensive Plan APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: At the Board of Supervisors retreat held on November 9, it was the consensus of the Board to schedule a joint meeting with the Planning Commission to discuss proposed revisions to the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan. It is requested that this meeting be scheduled for December 16, 2003. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends scheduling the joint meeting with the Planning Commission for December 16, 2003. N-1 GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Unaudited Balance at June 30, 2003 July 1, 2003 Explore Park Loan Repayment Balance at November 18, 2003 of General Amount Fund Revenues $8,977,656 6.60% $25,000 $9,002,656 6.62% Changes below this line are for information and planning purposes only. Balance from above $9,002,656 $9,002,656 6.62%~ Note: On December 18, 1990, the Board of Supervisors adopted a goal statement to maintain the General Fund Unappropriated Balance at 6.25% of General Fund Revenues 2003 - 2004 General Fund Revenues $135,97'1,831 6.25% of General Fund Revenues $8,498,239 Submitted By Rebecca E. Owens Director of Finance Approved By Elmer C. Hodge E ~~ County Administrator N°~ CAPITAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 10/28/2003 Amount Unaudited Balance at June 30, 2003 $360,172.56 Equipment and software for electronic records managemer (73,057.00)I system for Clerk to the Board of Supervisor's Office Balance at November 18, 2003 $287,115.56 Submitted By Rebecca E. Owens Director of Finance Approved By Elmer C. Hodge ~~ County Administrator ~~ RESERVE FOR BOARD CONTINGENCY COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Amount From 2003-2004 Original Budget $107,940.00 July 8, 2003 Appropriation towards Roanoke Regional Airport Alliance (8,193.00) July 22, 2003 Appropriation towards Project 50 Capital Campaign (10,000.00) July 22, 2003 Reserve towards Project 50 Capital Campaign (5,000.00) August 12, 2003 Appropriation for debris removal and stablilization (15,000.00) Balance at November 18, 2003 $69,747.00 Submitted By Rebecca E. Owens Director of Finance Approved By Elmer C. Hodge ~'~ County Administrator N -'~ FUTURE CAPITAL PROJECTS COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA Savings from 1996-1997 debt budget $670,000.00 Transfer from County Capital Projects Fund 1,113,043.00 FY1997-1998 Original budget appropriation 2,000,000.00 Savings from 1997-1998 debt fund 321,772.00 FY1998-1999 Original budget appropriation 2,000,000.00 FY1999-2000 Original budget appropriatio 2,000,000 Less increase in debt service (1,219,855) 780,145.00 Savings from 1998-1999 debt fund 495,363.00 FY2000-2001 Original budget appropriatio 2,000,000 Less increase in debt service (1,801,579) 198,421.00 FY 2001-2002 Original budget appropriatio 2,000,000 Less increase in debt service (465,400) Savings from 2001-02 debt fund 116,594 1,651,194.00 FY 2002-2003 Original budget appropriatio 2,000,000 Less increase in debt service (2,592,125) (592,125.00) FY 2003-2004 Original budget appropriatio 2,000,000 Less increase in debt service (2,202,725) (202,725.00) Balance at November 18, 2003 $8,435,088.00 Reserved for Future School .Operations FY2000-2001 Original budget appropriation $1,500,000.00 July 11, 2000 SW Co Regional Stormwater (290,000.00) FY2001-2002 Original budget appropriation 1,500,000.00 July 1, 2001 School Budgeted Start-Up Costs HVHS/Glenvar Middle (1,858,135.00) July 1, 2002 School Budgeted Start-Up Costs HVHS/Glenvar Middle (35,047.00) July 1, 2002 Transfer to Operating in original 2002-03 Budget (566,818.00) July 1, 2003 Transfer to Operating in original 2003-04 Budget (250,000.00) Balance at November 18, 2003 - Submitted By Rebecca E. Owens Director of Finance Approved By Elmer C. Hodge ~~~ County Administrator ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER N ° AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VI RGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER. MEETING DATE: November 18, 2003. AGENDA ITEMS: Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investment and Portfolio Policy, as of October 31, 2003. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: BANKERS ACCEPTANCE: SUNTRUST CAP 1,373,088.32 1,373,088.32 CASH INVESTMENT:: ALEXANDER KEY - LIR 5,295.77 5,295.77 CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSITS: SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA SAVINGS & LOAN 100,000.00 100,000.00 COMMERICAL PAPER: ALEXANDER KEY FED 1,002,420.56 BRANCH BANKING & TRUST 1,998,483.33 EVERGREEN 1,052,535.19 MORGAN KEEGAN 4,800.83 SUNTRUST 2,001,046.95 SUNTRUST CAP 309,458.96 6,368,745.82 CORPORATE BONDS ALEXANDER KEY FED 230,481.75 EVERGREEN 3,178,976.75 3,409,458.50 GOVERNMENT: ALEXANDER KEY FED 8,991,205.56 ALEXANDER KEY -Sub Acct 3,666,654.50 EVERGREEN 8,359,073.61 MORGAN KEEGAN 2,000,000.00 SUNTRUST -CAP 8,368,364.99 31,385,298.66 LOCAL GOVT INVESTMENT POOL: GENERAL OPERATION (G.O.) 9,038,172.55 9,038,172.55 ACTION NO ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER. MEETING DATE: November 18, 2003. AGENDA ITEMS: Statement of the Treasurer's Accountability per Investment and Portfolio Policy, as of October 31, 2003. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: BANKERS ACCEPTANCE: MONEY MARKET: ALEXANDER KEY FED EVERGREEN ALEXANDER KEY -Sub Acct SUNTRUST-CAP SUNTRUST -SWEEP WACHOVIA TOTAL 9,250,926.46 673,085.85 671,613.08 5,038,729.92 1,761,338.62 ~1 ~ ~~ 2,299,877.81 19,695,571.74 71,375,631.36 ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER ~- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: November 18, 2003 Work session to discuss the six-year secondary system construction plan for fiscal year 2004-2010 and review of the revenue sharing priority list for fiscal year 2004-2005. Arnold Covey Director of Community Development Elmer C. Hodge ~',/~' County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The following summarizes the changes made to this year's Six-Year Secondary Construction Plan, Revenue Sharing Priority List and Rural Addition Priority List. Roanoke County received $3.16 million last year. Roanoke County's budget for FY 2004- 2005 is estimated to be approximately $3.07 million. Countywide Incidental Construction Items, this category includes minor construction that can be completed normally within one year such as pavement overlays, drainage improvements, traffic signs, entrance culverts and minor curve improvements (usually covered under the Revenue Sharing program). Other items include in this category are the Rural Addition roads. Roanoke County has allocated $330,000 for this category of which $153,500 is appropriated to Rural Addition roads. Rural Addition projects - Artrip Lane has been completed and forwarded to VDOT for acceptance. Staff is currently working on Indian Hill Road construction plans for submittal to VDOT. Staff received one Rural Addition petition this year from the citizens on France Drive. '~ Roanoke County normally handles our minor construction items that can be completed normally within one year, such as pavement overlays, drainage improvements and minor curve improvements through our Revenue Sharing Program. Staff will again be requesting the maximum allocation of $500,000 for the FY 2004-2005 Revenue Sharing Program from the Commonwealth of Virginia. Attached are Roanoke County's lists of projects for FY 2004-2205. The bulk of Roanoke County's allocations of funds approximately $2.7 million are for numbered projects. Priority projects numbered 0 through 12 and 17 are scheduled to receive funding this year. They are Hollins Road, McVitty Road, Old Cave Spring Road, Colonial Avenue, Buck Mountain Road, Cotton Hill Road, Mountain View Road, Boones Chapel Road, Catawba Creek Road, Dry Hollow Road, Merriman Road, John Richardson Road and Rocky Road. Projects added to the plan are: • Hardy Road (priority #16) -this project involves reconstruction from the existing project at Vinton Town limits to the Blue Ridge Parkway Bridge. Staff is requesting that this project be added because of the current development approved along this corridor (Vinton Business Center and Cardinal Insulated Glass) and the increased activity in Bedford County and Smith Mountain Lake. Montcap Trail (priority #18) -this project involves paving 0.2 miles of unpaved road. Montcap Trail and County Line Road are the only two unpaved roads in Roanoke County that meet VDOT 50 vehicles per day requirement. Projects considered but not added because of insufficient funds: • Carvins Cove Dam Road, County Line Road, Bohon Hollow Road, Honeysuckle Road, Starkey Road,Two Ford Road, Hershberger Road, Manassas Drive and Franklin Street. These roads will be monitored each year for consideration to be added to the six-year plan. The complete Six-Year Construction Plan for FY2004 through 2010 and Revenue Sharing Priority List for FY2004 through 2005 are part of this report, for your review. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impacts to County funds are involved. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors authorize staff to schedule a public hearing on the six-year secondary road construction plan for fiscal year 2004-2010 and revenue sharing priority list for fiscal year 2004-2005 on December 16, 2003. 2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. ~-a AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 18, 2003 AGENDA ITEM: Work session to discuss proposed revisions to the solid waste ordinance SUBMITTED BY: Anne Marie Green Director of General Services APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge elf County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The solid waste ordinance was last revised in 1994. Since that time, various issues have arisen which need to be addressed, including service on private roads and in townhouse and condominium developments, the type of waste which is acceptable for automated and bulk and brush pick up, and when cans should be placed at and removed from the curb. In September, the Board toured several areas which highlighted some of these concerns. At the work session, staff plans to review these issues with the Board and receive input on the proposed changes so that the ordinance can be prepared for first and second reading. - l AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2003 RESOLUTION 111803-7 CERTIFYING THE CLOSED MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened a closed meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.2-3712 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such closed meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the closed meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the closed meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor McNamara to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES : Supervisors Flora, Church, Minnix, Altizer, McNamara NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Diane S. Childers Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Closed Meeting File AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2003 RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE CLOSED MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened a closed meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.2-3712 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such closed meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the closed meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the closed meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of 4 Roanoke County, Virginia. f ~ r t AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATIONOENTER, TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2003 ORDINANCE 111803-8 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A .81-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 2415 ELECTRIC ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 76.11-3-77) IN .THE WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-1 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF JEFFREY GLICK WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on October 28, 2003, and the second reading and public hearing were held November 18, 2003; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on November 4, 2003; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing .81- acre, as described herein, and located at 2415 Electric Road (Tax Map Number 76.11-3- 77) in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-1, Low Density Residential District, to the zoning classification of C-1, Office District, with conditions. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Jeffrey Glick. 3. That the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts: (1) Development of the site shall be in substantial conformity to the 1 J Concept Plan provided to the Planning Commission, dated November 4, 2003, attached hereto as Exhibit A. (2) Use shall be limited to general office. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the Cave Spring Road (VA Route 419) at about one mile northwest of Cave Spring the northeast corner of the property of J. T. Engleby (formerly Charlotte Temple property); thence with the northerly line of the Engleby property S. 53° 43' W. passing an iron pipe at 19 feet and following the existing boundary line fence, in all a total distance of 392.4 feet to a point in the centerline of a branch; thence up said branch, N. 50° 24' W. 115.49 feet to a point; thence leaving said branch and with a new division line through and across the property of Margie C. Wilson, N. 53° 43' E. 434.06 feet to a point in the Salem-Cave Spring Road; thence along said road, S. 29° 25' 30" E. 112.81 feet to the Place of Beginning, containing 1.06 acres, more or less, as shown on plat prepared by C. B. Malcolm, SCE, dated April 12, 1934. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor McNamara to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES : Supervisors Ftora, Church, Minnix, Altizer, McNamara NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Diane S. Childers Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Janet Scheid, Chief Planner William Driver, Director, Real Estate Valuation Paul Mahoney, County Attorney 2 ROANOKE COUNTY Applicants name: Jeffrey Glick DEPARTMENT OF Zoning: Rezoning from R> to C1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tax Map No. 76.11-3--77 0 5-I PETITIONER: Jeffrey Glick CASE NUMBER: 25-11/2003 Planning Commission Hearing Date: November 4, 2003 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: November 18, 2003 A. REQUEST The petition of Jeffrey Glick to Rezone .81 acres from R-1 Low Density Residential District to C-1 Office District in order to operate a general office, located in 2415 Electric Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS No citizens spoke. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION Mr. Chris Lowe presented the staff report. Mr. Witt asked whether V DOT is requiring a deceleration lane or a right hand turn lane. It was explained to Mr. Witt that in V DOT's initial comments that Mr. Glick would be required to build a right hand turn lane. It was also noted that this could also change when V DOT reviews the plans. No other questions were asked. D. CONDITIONS 1. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformity to the Concept Plan provided to the Planning Commission on November 4th, 2003. 2. Use shall be limited to general office. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Ross made a motion to approve the request with the conditions. Motion carried 4-0. F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report _ Other Janet Scheid, Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commission . ; 1 Petitioner: Request: Location: .STAFF REPORT Jeffrey Glick Rezoning from R-1 to C-1 2415 Electric Road Magisterial District: Windsor Hills EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: ~~ This is a Rezoning request from R-1 to C-1, at 2415 Electric Road. The property is zoned R-1, Residential and is designated as Transition in the 1998 Roanoke County Community Plan. The request involves one parcel, consisting of 0.81 acre. Suggested The staff suggest the following conditions: Conditions: 1. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformity to the Concept Plan provided to the Planning Commission on November 4tn, 2003. 2. Use shall be limited to general office. 1. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Site Plan Review required. V DOT Commercial Entrance Plan Review Required. Sealed Building Plans for ADA Compliance -Change of Use 2. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Background -The petitioner's property is 0.81 acre with an existing 1950's 1 '/2 story residential home that will be renovated for the proposed new business. There are two creeks on the property - one creek is behind the house to the rear of the property and the other creek is in front of the house along Electric Road. This property is prone to flooding as recently as this past spring and winter, but is not identified as a FEMA flood study area at this time, which means there are no regulations against development or redevelopment in this area. Topograph~getation -The property has a vegetative buffer along Electric Road. Behind that buffer is a creek which has a culvert bridge for access to the home. To the rear of the property is another vegetative buffer along the second creek. 1 ~~.~ Surrounding_Neighborhood -The property is adjacent to an undeveloped R-3C zoned property to the north and a C-1 property to the south which is the Roman Catholic Diocese Church. To the EAR rear (west) the property is adjacent to an R-1 property which is the home of the Reverend of the T neighboring Roman Catholic Diocese Church. 3. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Background -The petitioner proposes to use the subject property for an insurance office with a total of 3 employees. Petitioner estimates that 5-10 clients per day would be on site. Site Layout/Architecture -The existing building will be used for the office. Minor modifications may need to be made to accommodate the use as an office. Parking will need to be added as well as landscaping. Under current zoning regulations the applicant will need a minimum of 4 parking spaces. ADA compliance will also need to be addressed during site plan review. Access/Traffic Circulation - VDOT believes that this site has sufficient sight distance to allow a commercial entrance, but this will need to be evaluated by the developer prior to a permit being issued. If a new commercial entrance is permitted, a right turn lane will be required for the site. The length of the full width turn lane and the taper will be determined once additional information is received about the entrance and the estimated trips generated by the site. Anew crossover will not be allowed even if a new commercial entrance is approved. Fire & Rescue/LTtilities -Fire and rescue services will continue, as they currently exist. Public water and sanitary sewer is currently available. This petition does not affect the existing public water and sanitary sewer systems. Department of Economic Development -The Department of Economic Development supports commercial activity that conforms to the Community Plan and is compatible with the surrounding land use. They offer no objections to the proposed rezoning. 4. CONFORMANCE WITH ROANOKE COUNTY COMMUNITY PLAN The site is designated as Transition in the 1998 Community Plan. Transition land use areas encourage the orderly development of highway frontage parcels. Transition areas are suitable for office, institutional, and small scale, coordinated retail uses. This rezoning is compatible with the 1998 Roanoke County Community Plan and is also compatible with the 1987 Route 419 Frontage Development Plan. 5. STAFF CONCLUSIONS This is a request to obtain a rezoning from R-1 to C-1. The request involves 0.81 acre of (1) one parcel at 2415 Electric Road. This petition conforms to the Roanoke County Community Plan and the site has ample space to conform to all applicable development standards. No negative impacts are anticipated. 2 CASE NUMBER: 25-11/2003 PREPARED BY: Chris Lowe HEARING PC: November 4, 2003 BOS: November 18, 2003 DATES: 3 County of Roanoke ~ For Staff Use Onl ~`^ ~` ~~ Community Development Date received: received ~y: Planning & Zoning ~ Application fee: PC/Bi~ate: 5204 Bernard Drive Q''l"i .O P O Box 29800 Placuds issued: BflS date: Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 p ~ 1 (540) 772-2068 FAX (540) 776-7155 Case Number 'j - ~, ,a (,~ ALL APPLICANTS Che e of application filed (check all that apply) ezomng ^ Special Use ^ Variance ^ Waiver ^ Administrative Appeal cants name/address w/zip Z o ~ Z E'C.src-i 2 / ~- ~, phone: ~~~.J 90 i'~~~%' App li ~- -- - ~.~i ~G ~ IE'- v ~ .~ ~ )~~' , //~ . Work: ,J~ ~,~ ~1 ~ Cell #: / ~ ~4 r~ Fax No.: .5~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~,.5 j/ Z y~~ rta~Ca7~~C- Owuer's name/address w/zip Phone #: ~Y~~ 7 ~ y ~ ~ ~-~ .~.r -c~v~`~~ z ~.11a1~'Work: 7 - ~ ~ ~ Fax No. #: ~v Cs ~,r,~ ~ ~~~r~rGL ,~ ~.~~,~ Property Location C ~ ~~ ~~,~ %~ ~~ $. ~ iS L I ,~ / 1 ~ Magisterial District: I. ~ J L . z /- h:~v ' ~C ~ ,~,~ 7~ /~' Community Planning area: r ~ ~ f Tax Map No.: ~~ I / _ 3 .- 7~~ Existing Zoning: Size of parcel(s): Acres: ~ ~~ Existing Land Use: ~~;>~;~~,,, ~~' RE~[INING SPECIAI. USE PER1tIITA1VD WAIVER APPLICANTS (R/S/W) Proposed Zoning: G ~ Proposed Land Use: ©~ Does the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes [~ No ^ IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes ~ No IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIItED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being pro$ered with this request? Yes ^ No ^ Y;4RIANCE, WAIVER AND ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL APPLICANTS (l~i'i{!/AA) Variance/Waiver of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Appeal of Zoning Administrator's decision to Appeal of Interpretation of Section(s): Appeal of Interpretation of Zoning Map to of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE TTEMS ARE MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. R1S/W V/AA R/S/W VJAA R/S/W V/AA t/~ Consultation Y 8 1 /2" x 11 "concept plan Application fee Application !/ Metes and bounds description Proffers, if applicable J/ Jusfification Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners I hereby certify that I am either the owner of the property or the owner's agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the laiowledge and consent of the owner. Owner's Signature JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONING, SPECIAL USE FER~IIT'OR WAVER REQUEST Applicant --~~~J'~.~ ~ C7G, L~~ !The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit or waiver requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. `~'...' Please explain how the request fiuthers the proposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district class cation in the Zoning Ordinance. 5~~= ~-T~~i~~ :t;J Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. __ - 'Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adj owing properties, and the surrounding area, as well as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. f JUSTIFICATION FOR VARIANCE REQUEST 5TATF FARM ~ ' Jeff Glick Ins Agcy Inc INSURANCE Auto-Life-Health-Home and Business E ectrlc R Roanoke, Va 24018 Phone (540) 989-6969 September 22, 2003 RE: Rezoning of 2415 Electric Road, Roanoke, VA 24018 1) The proposed zoning is consistent with existing adjacent properties. The Our Lady of Nazareth Catholic Church property adjacent to the South and West is zoned C1. The vacant property adjacent to the North is zoned R3. 2) The Roanoke County Community Plan has designated the property in the "Transition" area. Transition areas generally serve as developed buffers between highways and nearby or adjacent lower intensity development. Transition areas are best suited for office, institutional and small-scale, coordinated retail uses. The proposed office use fits well into the Transition designation. <„/ ~~ 3) The proposed office will be used as an insurance office with three employees. The office will generate minimal traffic. The office is visited by 5 to 10 clients over the course of a day. There will be no change to the water and sewer services. The rezoning will have no impact on other public services including schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. ~, .W.. C01~iCEPT PLAN CHECKLIST A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan shall graphically depict the land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development of the property and by so dring, correct any deficiencies that may nat be manageable by County permitting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is requn-ed prior to the issuance of a building permit. Site plan and building permit procedures enstue compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use pernut or variance, the concept plan maybe altered to the extent permitted by the zoning distric# and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, waiver and variance applications. The plan should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request. The County Planning Division staff may exempt some of the items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the following are considered minimum: ALL APPLICANTS a. Applicant name and name of development b. Date, scale and north ar•ow c. Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions d. Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties e. Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. f. The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties g. All property lines and easements I % - h. All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights _ i. Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development _ j. Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces .4dditional information required forREZONING and SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANTS k. Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site _ 1. Any driveways, entcances/exits, curb openings and crossovers m. Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals n. Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections o. Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants p. Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed _ q. If project is to be phased, please show phase schedule I certify that all items required in the checklist above are complete. .--''"~ ~' ~'~ ~~ Signariue of~p ' '° Date ~~~~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2003 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A .81-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 2415 ELECTRIC ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 76.11-3-77) IN THE WINDSOR HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-1 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF JEFFREY GLICK WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on October 28, 2003, and the second reading and public hearing were held November 18, 2003; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on November 4, 2003; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required bylaw. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing .81- acre, as described herein, and located at 2415 Electric Road (Tax Map Number 76.11-3- 77) in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-1, Low Density Residential District, to the zoning classification of C-1, Office District, with conditions. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Jeffrey Glick. 3. That the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts: (1) Development of the site shall be in substantial conformity to the Concept Plan provided to the Planning Commission, dated November 4, 2003, attached hereto as Exhibit A. (2) Use shall be limited to general office. 1 ~~ .,,~ 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the Cave Spring Road (VA Route 419) at about one mile northwest of Cave Spring the northeast corner of the property of J. T. Engleby (formerly Charlotte Temple property); thence with the northerly line of the Engleby property S. 53° 43' W. passing an iron pipe at 19 feet and following the existing boundary line fence, in all a total distance of 392.4 feet to a point in the centerline of a branch; thence up said branch, N. 50° 24' W. 115.49 feet to a point; thence leaving said branch and with a new division line through and across the property of Margie C. Wilson, N. 53° 43' E. 434.06 feet to a point in the Salem-Cave Spring Road; thence along said road, S. 29° 25' 30" E. 112.81 feet to the Place of Beginning, containing 1.06 acres, more or less, as shown on plat prepared by C. B. Malcolm, SCE, dated April 12, 1934. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. 2 ~N ~s=ati~ pe,~~~a z yIa' ~GEer~1~ ~~ ~- ,, ~ ~~ a ., -~ -. __ -, ~- ~ ~,. 7 2415 ~o~ ~Q ~S \~SJ9 .._\ ' ~\ c ~~LE~r ~tIVE ~' ~~~J~ C.9 ~ t ~'o r E~ Cti~{C r ~ pZK/s F(~'cTa.~ F-oANlI~C'~ Z i(D ( $ . 81 ~c.[.s S Concept Plan November 4, 2003 Exhibit A ~~ ~ 15-i Po~t~~ ~a~ate~ ~ Weatwor-^t~h 1§. ~ 47.A9 1~. 4757 v 1@. 478LT 21. 280 Ae.(D) 211 Aa. C '~ 7 I ', e 13. 1,~. 47:5 4745 poodlaq Dr 475D 23 ~• 47,9 YO 315. 4757 4758 38. rr 3~ ~, 3 Y 53. z5az 4751, 59• 47'17 52. ` s54o 47?8 18. r 17. ~~ s 474E 18. ? e ?6P4 19. 5 a 4 20. 1645 p, ROANOKE COUNTY I DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Applicants name: Jeffrey Glick Zoning: Rezoning from R > to C 1 Tax Map No. 76.11-3--77 __--- ~~ ~ ~ r BODK J~5 PAGE2O9 33~/ THIS DEED, Made and entered into this the 21st day of Junes 1948, by and between MARGIE C. WILSON and N. RALPH WILSON, her husband, parties of the first part, and WENDELL R. GRIFFITH and NELLIE L. GRIFFITH, husband and wife respectively with the right of survivorship as hereinafter provided, parties of the second part. W I T N E S S E T H THAT FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the sum of EIGHT HUNDRED ($800.00) DOLLARS cash in hand paid by the parties of ~e second part unto the parties of the first part, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, the said parties of the first part do hereby BARGAIN, SELL, GRANT AND CONVEY unto the parties of the second part as tenants by the entirety and unto the sur- vivor of them, their assigns, and the heirs and assigns of the survivor forever in fee simple, with GENERALIeARRANTY OF TITLE, all that certain lot or parcel of land, with all the appurtenan- ces thereunto belonging, lying and being in the Cave Spring Magisterial District of Roanoke County, Virginia, and more par- titularly described as follows, to-wit: BEGINNING at a point in the Cave ~ Spring Road (Virginia Route 119) at about one mile northwest of Cave Spring the northeast corner of the property of J. T. Engleby (formerly Charlotte Temple property); thence with the northerly line of the Engleby property, S. 53 deg. 43' ta. passing an iron pipe at 19 feet and following the existing boundary line fence, in all a total dis- tance of 392.4 feet to a point in the centerline of a branch; thence up said branch, N. 50 deg. 24' W. 115.49 feet to a point; thence leaving said branch and with a new division line through and across the property of Margie C. Wilson N. 53 deg. 43' E. ~ 434._06 feet to a point in the Sa~.em-Cave Spring Road; thence along said road, S. 29 deg. 25' 30" E. 112.81 feet to the place of BEGINNING, contain- ing 1.06 acres, more or less, as shown on plat prepared by C. B. Malcolm, S. C. E., dated April ~ "12, 1934, hereto attached for recordation, and BEING a part of the property conveyed to the female grantor by deed from Mary Josephine Crockett et vir, dated February 271 1937, recorded ~ in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court for the County of Roanoke, Virginias in Deed Book 245 at I Page yl. •~ - . -2- ~^ ,,- BODK 395 PacE21O ~ '"'~ TO HAVE AND TO HOLD unto the said parties of the second part jointly during the ter:~~ of their joint lives ' and then to the survivor of the said parties in fee simples it being the intention of this deed to convey to the said parties of the second part as tenants by the enrirety~ with the right of survivorship as provided by Seetion 5160 of the Code of Vir- ginia as amended. ~ ~ THE SAID PARTIES OF THE FIRST PA RT covenant I that they have a right to convey the said property in fee simple ~ to the grantees; that they have done no act to encumber the same; that the said grantees shall have quiet and eaceable p possession of said property free from all encumbrances; and that they the said parties of the first party will execute such further assur- ' antes of title as may be requisite and necessary. WITNESS THE FOLLOWING SIGNATURES AND SEALS: _ i _ .. + ~~ ~ SEAL) •~' '' ~ '' ~ MAR IE C WILSON _ I ~- -, ~ ~-G~~G ( SEAL ) ~ !_ ~ .~ ~~ W. RALPH WILSON I STATE OF VIRGINIA CITY OF ROANOKE Public in and for the ~' a Notary e~ State of Virginias do hereby certify that Margie C. Wilson and W. Ralph Wilson, her husbands whose names are signed to the foregoing writing bearing date of the 21st day of Junes 191+8, have acknowledged the same before ms inmy City and State aforiesaid. Given under try hand this the ~ Z day of June ~ 191+8. MY COMMISSIQN EXPIRES c•-r/ ~ ~/ /!1~/ -~~~ . " -- ~----- - -------- O o ,~ o ° N ti '~ ~ ~ D ~~ ~ 'ro ~) ~ ~ ~ Z a~ ~ ~ ~ W ail H H ~ ~ ~ ~ P~ ~ ~ o o ' `"fir o ~ ~ • wl ~w ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~'' ? ~ `~ ,a ~, rz H S z ~ ~ o H ~ Q ~ oI ~ ~~ ~ a ~ o ~ Z ' A ~ Z U 'c ~; ~7 } a y a A Q' p W ~ .b o ~ 'f WH AE -7 c, 0 ° L a .. ~ aa W W _~ ~` ~ '~ ~ . ~ . ~ H ~ - I - ~- Z---- - -- - ~_ -- -- -- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2003 ORDINANCE 111803-9 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 1.88-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED ON EAGLE CREST DRIVE (PART OF TAX MAP NOS.98.01-3-99, 27, 31) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF I-2 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF AR UPON THE APPLICATION OF BUCK MOUNTAIN LAND, LLC WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on October 28, 2003, and the second reading and public hearing were held November 18, 2003; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on November 4, 2003; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 1.88- acres, as described herein, and located on Eagle Crest Drive (Part of Tax Map Numbers 98.01-3-99, 27, 31) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of I-2, Industrial District, to the zoning classification of AR, Agricultural/Residential District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Buck Mountain Land, LLC. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at Point A, thence S. 64° 14' 01" E. 110.00 feet to Point B; thence S. 44° 56' 31" E. 161.18 feet to Point C; thence S. 48° 46' 25" W. 235.00 feet to Point D; thence S. 62° 38' S0" W. 103.68 feet to Point E; thence N. 39° 49' S3" W. 237.30 feet to Point F; thence N. 48° 46' 25" E. 276.44 feet to Point A, the Place of 1 ~ ~ aracw•:•ny~m~orm~raet~~~ ana aavo WOT~dN3O51M(il N7lIVW ~IItlW 3 BLObZ dIN1~81A ~3NONVO2f d~N~~~IA ~3x~~~Q~ -,t BbS-b661 ~ Sbb6-ZLL (Ob51 ~Xdd . 69902 %O8'O'd S2l3KNV'Id-S2i0A3A2~f1S~-STr27f~3Ct~~~I~TnNr~7 sivos 'Ot YW1O0 ttbb-bLL lObS) ~3NOHd MS'3(1N3Ad NO13l8WVi18 b99b ~ ,{ ~~'~~~ ~~O$'~'~ 1~L.7QJ''Y `ill l EOOZ 6l tl38W31d3S ~1vc u .; ~~ ~ ~ N] ~ ~2 q ° ~ ~ _ Q ~~Si ~~~~ 0 3 ~ ~ ~ p m ~ ~ ti ~~y ~~~ a ~ o ~ oza: o ~¢ > moo ~<0 4 ~. y¢`-~ ~, z `~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ y ~ Nq ~, y z ~~~ g~~a ~ ~ ~~ ~ o ~ o ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~_ ~~<3 ~ ~~~ ~r~ ~ ~ ~~= Qa ~« z~~ ~~ZFZpi~~Nb NH N•0~1 Cs7 ~ ~ Q¢ O `'~~ ~O~C ~e~VW~~~~ a V ~V ~b~xt,~ qCZ ~ ~ ~~~~8~~ ~1 v~ ~3K0 <O~~ `rye=~~ ~~'~- ~ 'rr+y\ ~ axU ~ aac~ ~C7j ~~~2W~ V eW~~O ~ON ~<2`~~~~~~~3 ~~ I~ ~~~L~iZdy~ ~~nj~a ~oo p~J i ~..- ~V < U ~ W < C / • N H w ~~~ / ~d ~o L\ J ~8~a ~ T'~ ~ ----~ spar ~ ~~ ~ ~/ ~~ ~ i, 4i ~ ~ a .~~, 4 n ~ a~ ~'~ \ l~ ~ 1 y ~ ~ ~ c -- ~ / -' _ ~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ .~' / ~' t ~ ~ ~'' Y / 2 0 ,~ / W aS h ~ C ~ c~ R ~ ~ ~_ .+ W „~ ~a / ~ c`~ ~ / / k.,,,, az~ett ~ ~ / ,aozea N~g R= ~~ ~~3~~ ~~2TA~ „+2 <~~ Sa~a;~ i d _~ ~~ ~~ r~ !~ROANOKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Applicants C/0 Don Day Zoning: Rezoning From I2 TO AR Tax Map No. 98.01-3-99,27,31 0 -.' S-~ r PETITIONER: Buck Mountain Land, LLC CASE NUMBER: 26-11/2003 Planning Commission Hearing Date: November 4, 2003 Board of Supervisors Hearing Date: November 18, 2003 A. REQUEST The petition of Buck Mountain Land, LLC to Rezone 1.88 acres from I-2 Industrial District to AR Agricultural/Residential District in order to construct single family dwellings, located on Eagle Crest Drive, Cave Spring Magisterial District. B. CITIZEN COMMENTS No citizens spoke. C. SUMMARY OF COMMISSION DISCUSSION Mr. John Murphy presented the staff report. There was no discussion regarding the petition. D. CONDITIONS None. E. COMMISSION ACTION(S) Mr. Witt made a motion to approve the request with the conditions. Motion carried 4- 0. F. DISSENTING PERSPECTIVE None. G. ATTACHMENTS: _ Concept Plan _ Vicinity Map _ Staff Report _ Other Janet Scheid, Secretary Roanoke County Planning Commission f T . , - r_ STAFF REPORT Petitioner: Buck Mountain Land, LLC. "" . Request: Rezoning of 1.88 acres of I-2, Industrial District, to AR, Agricultural I Residential District for the development. of additional single family residential lots. Location: 3800 Block of Eagle Crest Drive Magisterial District: Cave Spring EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This petition is for the rezoning of 1.88 acres of I-2 land to AR, for the creation of five (5) residential (AR) lots. The proposed use is consistent with the 1998 Roanoke County Community Plan and supported by staff. 1. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Development of additional lots would require subdivision plan and plat review. The construction of houses would require building permits. Any new access to a pubic road designed for VDOT acceptance would require VDOT review and entrance permits. In the AR zoning district the minimum lot size, with both public water and sewer, is 25,000 square feet and 90 feet of public road frontage. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Background - Prior to 1995 this parcel and the surrounding parcels were zone M-2, Manufacturing. In 1995 all of these parcels were rezoned to AR, excluding the 1.88 acre subject parcel. The subject parcel retained its zoning (M-2 was renamed to I-2 as part of the adoption of the new 1992 zoning ordinance). The 1.88 acres was used in conjunction with an asphalt plant and contractor's yard. Within the last two (2) years the surrounding AR zoned area has been developed as a residential subdivision. Existing Site Conditions -The property currently has some industrial type buildings that have been used for a contractor's yard for a construction company partially surrounded by a gravel parking area. Prior to that use the site was used in conjunction with an asphalt plant. The developer intends on removing all construction related buildings and material on the site to subdivide for additional residential lots. Surrounding Neighborhood -The surrounding neighborhood, Hidden Ridge subdivision, has been developed as single-family homes in the AR zoning district. The roads have been built to public standards to be accepted into the VDOT road system. There are several houses under construction in the immediate vicinity. This property is not visible from the Blue Ridge Parkway. 3. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AccesslTraffic Circulation -Access to lots would be from Eagle Crest Drive or Piney Ridge Drive. This road was constructed to public standards and intersects with Buck Mountain Road just beyond the Blue Ridge Parkway overpass. Fire & Rescue/Utilities -Public water and sewer services are available. Fire and rescue services would continue as presently served. ``~~ -f 4. CONFORMANCE WITH ROANOKE COUNTY COMMUNITY PLAN The subject property is designated as Development in the 1998 Roanoke County Community Plan. This future land use area is where most new neighborhood development will occur, including large-scale planned developments which mix residential with retail and office use. Innovation in housing design and environmental sensitivity in site development is a key objective. Conventional residential is one of the encouraged uses. 5. STAFF CONCLUSIONS The proposed rezoning of 1.88 acres from I-2 to AR is consistent with the Roanoke County Community Plan. The rezoning will make the subject parcel consistent with the Development future land use designation and will be more compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. Staff supports the rezoning request. CASE NUMBER: #26.1112003 PREPARED BY: J. Murphy HEARING DATES: PC: 1114103 BOS: 11118/03 ment 5204 Bernard Drive P O Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 (540) '772-2068 FAX (540) 772-2108 ~~<< ~,',. Received by: PC/BMA date: BOS date: ' .~ r r a UPl T('ANT,S Check type of application filed (check al] that apply) Rezoning ^ Special Use ;'applicants name/address w/zip C/ 0 Don D y e Buck Mountain Land, LLC P. 0. Box 20041 Roanoke, Va. 24018 Phone: 7 7 6- 9 0 5 7 Work: 776-905 Cell#: 520-3250 FaxNo.: 776-9054 Otimer's name/address w/zip B u c k Mountain Land LLC Phone #: 7 7 6- 9 0 5 2 C/0 Don Dye P. 0. Box 20041 Fax No.#: 776-9054 Roanoke Va. 24018 Property Location Magisterial District: Cave S p r i n g South of Buck Mountain Road 7'ax Map No.: 9 8 . 0 1 -~ ,~~9 8 . 0 1 ~ ~~ Size of parcel(s): Acres: 1 . 8 8 For Staff Use Onl ____ Date received: ~~ Application fee: Placards i suede i 1 Case Number ~ ~- ^ Variance Community Planning area: Cave S p r i n )/xisting Zoning: 1 _ 2 Existing LandUse:Utility Contractor/Office & Shop REZONING AND SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANTS (R/5) ProposedZoning:AR Agricultural/Residential District ProposcdLandUse: Low Density Single Family Dwellings goes the parcel meet the minimum lot area, width, and frontage requirements of the requested district? Yes 1~ No ^ IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST. Does the parcel meet the minimum criteria for the requested Use Type? Yes ~1 No ^ IF NO, A VARIANCE IS REQUIRED FIRST If rezoning request, are conditions being proffered with this request? Yes ^ No ^ GARIANCE APPLICANTS (I~ ii ariance of Section(s) of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance in order to: Is the application complete? Please check if enclosed. APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF ANY OF THESE I"I'El'IS ARE )MISSING OR INCOMPLETE. R/s v R,~s v >vs v 8 1/2" x 11"concept plan Application fee Consultation Proffers, if a licable Application Metes and bounds description pp Water and sewer application Adjoining property owners Justification T he.*eby certify that I am either the owner of the prope or the owner-s agent or contract purchaser and am acting with the knowledge an consent of the owner. Owner's Signature County of Roanoke Community Develop Planning & Zoning . „.. ..... , °:. JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT ~R WAIVER REQUEST Applicant Buck Mounta' L LLC The Planning Commission will study rezoning, special use permit or waiver requests to determine the need and justification for the change in terms of public health, safety, and general welfare. Please answer the following questions as thoroughly as possible. Use additional space if necessary. Please explain how the request furthers the purposes of the Roanoke County Ordinance as well as the purpose found at the beginning of the applicable zoning district classification in the Zoning Ordinance. THE I~ ZOINING OF THIS 1.88 ACRE TRACT DOES NOT FIT IN THIS NEW DEVELOPED SUBDIVISION. Please explain how the project conforms to the general guidelines and policies contained in the Roanoke County Community Plan. CURRENTLY MEETS ROANOKE COUNTY LAND USE PLAN. Please describe the impact(s) of the request on the property itself, the adjoining properries, ana the surrouna~ng aeon, a~ Wes.. as the impacts on public services and facilities, including water/sewer, roads, schools, parks/recreation and fire and rescue. REZONINING THIS SMALL 1.88 ACRE TRACT FROM I2 TO AR WILL BENEFIT THE EXISTING SUBDIVISION THE LAND LIES WITHIN. All PUBLIC UTILITIES AND ROADS ARE ALREADY IN PLACE. THE TRACT CAN ONLY YEILD 5 LOTS AND SHOULD IN NO WAY HAVE A NEGATIVE IMPACT ON SCHOOLS AND PUBLIC SAFETY. 3 `CONCEPT PLAN CHECKI.IS'I' A concept plan of the proposed project must be submitted with the application. The concept plan snail grapmca~~y uc~i~i u~~ land use change, development or variance that is to be considered. Further, the plan shall address any potential land use or design issues arising from the request. In such cases involving rezonings, the applicant may proffer conditions to limit the future use and development of the property and by so doing, correct any deficiencies that may not be manageable by County permitting regulations. The concept plan should not be confused with the site plan or plot plan that is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Site plan and building permit procedures ensure compliance with State and County development regulations and may require changes to the initial concept plan. Unless limiting conditions are proffered and accepted in a rezoning or imposed on a special use permit or variance, the concept plan may be altered to the extent permitted by the zoning district and other regulations. A concept plan is required with all rezoning, special use permit, waiver and variance applications. The plan. should be prepared by a professional site planner. The level of detail may vary, depending on the nature of the request. The County Planning Division staff may exempt some of the items or suggest the addition of extra items, but the following are considered minimum: AL,L APPLICANTS . r/ a. Applicant name and name of development _~,/ b. Date, scale and north arrow r/ /c. Lot size in acres or square feet and dimensions // d. Location, names of owners and Roanoke County tax map numbers of adjoining properties ~// e. Physical features such as ground cover, natural watercourses, floodplain, etc. v' ` f. The zoning and land use of all adjacent properties _~ g. All property lines and easements y,~/~h. All buildings, existing and proposed, and dimensions, floor area and heights ~/' „i. Location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the development: j. Dimensions and locations of all driveways, parking spaces and loading spaces Additional information required for REZONING and SPECIAL USE PERMTl APPLICANTS k. Existing utilities (water, sewer, storm drains) and connections at the site 1. Any driveways, entrances/exits, curb openings and crossovers _ m. Topography map in a suitable scale and contour intervals n. Approximate street grades and site distances at intersections _ o. Locations of all adjacent fire hydrants - p. Any proffered conditions at the site and how they are addressed q. If project is to be phased, please show phase schedule I certify that all items r aired in the checklist above are complete. ~ ~2~~~ Signa a of applicant Date 6 ,.. ~~,., AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2003 ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 1.88-ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED ON EAGLE CREST DRIVE (PART OF TAX MAP NOS.98.01-3- 99, 27, 31) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF I-2 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF AR UPON THE APPLICATION OF BUCK MOUNTAIN LAND, LLC WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on October 28, 2003, and the second reading and public hearing were held November 18, 2003; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on November 4, 2003; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required bylaw. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 1.88- acres, as described herein, and located on Eagle Crest Drive (Part of Tax Map Numbers 98.01-3-99, 27, 31) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of I-2, Industrial District, to the zoning classification of AR, Agricultural/Residential District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Buck Mountain Land, LLC. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at Point A, thence S. 64° 14' 01" E. 110.00 feet to Point B; thence S. 44° 56' 31" E. 161.18 feet to Point C; thence S. 48° 46' 25" W. 235.00 feet to Point D; thence S. 62° 38' 50" W. 103.68 feet to Point E; thence N. 39° 49' 53" W. 237.30 feet to Point F; thence N. 48° 46' 25" E. 276.44 feet to Point A, the Place of Beginning, and containing 1.88 acres, more or less, as shown on a plat prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C. dated September 19, 2003, and attached hereto as •~~ 'tl,. Exhibit A. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. 2 •• , a~+c•~•nro..~nn»e.rsaw W07JdN3O5lMfll N7lIVW ~IIVW 3 9L04Z dINIJ81~ ~3AONd08 dWlJ~lfA 3XONVON ..~ Bb5-b661 ~ ~~ ~ Sbb6-ZLL (Ob5) ~XVd . 6990ZX06'O'd S2131~IN~/'1d-S~i0A3A21f1S-S2f931~tIJi~I3 ~~ '~ 1NOa Ltbb'b[L lObS) ~3NOHd MS'3(1N3AV N013lHWdNB b994 "1 ~ ~5`~~~Jj~OS'S'~j N~aS"~n~ EOOZ 6l tl38W31d3S ,~ba J 'a r ~ S ,\.J ~ ,.., ,^1 ~~ ~ ~ N ^i ~Z ~ M ~ ~ ~ ^ ~ <~y ~g ~ ~ ~ ~ O M p ~ ~ V Z 0;~~ 6~ ~ I ~ ~ z O ~ ~ Z ~ ~ ~~2 Ni ~5 p 3 ~ F wpm ZQ ~ o ~`c a ~ ~ aQ~,~ pQ > ~~~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ .~w o ~ ~~ ~~~ gw ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ W N O W ~ x ~ ~~`3_ ~~~~ "~ ~ ~`~ ~ O ~ Q O Z W ~ 41 ~ O ~~~ c <~~ N ~ ape •~ ~ CO U ~~2 s_~~C a ~~~ ~H~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ¢ O a ~ O 2 ~~~ ~}< m ~ Q~G ~ ~ ti 0~ 2 ~ Q Q Fmm3 '~ ~c~i~^w>= S2 a p W Q" ~ O y ~+~~ yam o~(~~?°~~'''~x~gN~ W m~0 e~ O s ~ } D ~~'~~` yy ~~o ~~~~ ~~N~~~~~t~Z~e~~ a ~ ~U ~ ~t~yyr~nrl~~a `yqy~~ ~ ~_~-! ~~ ~66~~ eiV~~~'~ON Fez C=. $~~~_~~ ~Ei.,~wa'io1<~ ''~a~~ N4aggqqo 00 uM~ ~j2~oH~O~z 4~~~~~~~ ypQ,yl~,~ ^1 ~s~~ oo: a < ~ / /, ~ ~ w ~~~~. // N~,/ ~ ----~ sibs ~ ~~ i ~~ -a i ~ 1 \ ` 4 y ~ a d~ ~ ~ ~e ~ y ~ ~ \ tt a~ ~ ~ ~ ~o i ~ ~ ~' ~'~ ~~ f W i w / -' _ _ Cr ~ C s `V b_ ~ \ uZS 1 I ~l~v'V ~ ~ ~d H C w ,,p~~ W o ~{ ~ ~ ~$~ a ~ ~ ~ ~a Nag ,itrri ~a x / / ~o ~ ~ ~ s ~ / ~ ,oorsz ~~`~~= a~ ~'~~m;e I I o ~ if SN1(?liC-1CYtti' ~"i!b V^.'? PIOCC ~q V. )HL~ ~)In doOY Ot•sl -YV 1 n390J OP t : d . Otc` ~'iN ~i Id k.5 '31!3 ~1~ ~t )13~ifily ~yy ,. ~,?: ~e ~ ~~ ~ ~ v ~~~4 ~*\' `I \\ t '!'~ . 'k+ ` `\. Z «~ t~jl 1 ,j~I~)~1G~U}1 rl r-..-- pi ~~y, i }}}}~~~~ ~,I ~ ~~e1.:Wtiyyq CY~+]ji 4i 61 ~ ~ '' j ` 'Gl ~ ~ ~ ~.~~~~I I V ' I ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~'l v ~~ I1W il l~ l .'~V YN=dM~l lyy..~~, J~Mtl ~,~ y - - ;4Y_ ~•• Blt1 fi0r.1 ,~ c~OC'hZ:.i38 .?1d35 =fro .- .- y ti ` [ 4 mot. I~ Vi _ F ~ ~: t~ "r I-Tm C.' D .2 (' F { G _ _` f' V1 ~ ~M ~ >~ 1I J ~ Q ~ i i~ _..- ' I~ trl kj ~ L~ ~ 4 Y -'il ~ ¢ a c'l L ~.~` - ^r ~11 q t `~ ~" " S, G~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~il t~y gl Ml~ s I s ~fi~d~~~~~~~~ - ~I :. ~~ : ~m " IV ~a s~ ,, ~ a ~~k~~~~~a~a~ l _~ " IN `•~Yh ~h'oh~A~:: '~ ~ `---J --- . ( 9 . C v _ `.I ,~ i tt „`~., ~^ ti : r-j C IY :e ~ ~ ~, ~: I Q ~~ ~ ` Q c~-Z ~ / 2 ~, . .mke.~ ~1 ~ M1 ~ ' t6 h CC ' % '1 .. `~ t I;; 160.4- ;FS-i~M , ~ 1 a. / J j, /:' ~ V ~ $ o / `;- ,~e _ e^ 3' ~~;j ° Q l ,~ ~~ f ~ u" ~ ;y v c rn ~ N ~ ir x ~ n G J a ~r ~ e 1 ' PJ ` ~ j : ~~I ` Y Q y~1 T %~v r / ~ ~ •( c: H , ~ ~ ; /J am ~ I'' ` ~+ N.6M~ ~ r V !~~ -' ~ t c`i ~ \ / u i I .~ y ~ ~~ Q~ oz ! - = . , ., _ ~;~ ., _ _. ___ __ ~ 62 ( ~/ ~. _, 1 .. t., _. _ ~ _ _ ,- 5 i ~ - ~ ,. 7ik; r r ~ .1 ,09 ZbZ ~~ ~~ lq ~~. ~Ji ~ \ t-.~- ' o / / I .' t~ti ~ \ ~' . `~ .. ~ ~, ~ ~, ry n ~ ?R ~~ ~' ' ~ ~l I q t~. ry~.y^~ `t':u. ~~/ I fin: n a3y n 111 .LA962 ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ // t% b's i'~~ $~ OJ,r(l! ~` ~ ~ j ~ ~n kZ `-'l r-: / \' % may' ~ ~ < ~~'c~S I) 1 °~ , ~ '` K ~ ~ ~ ~ ~``~ rya; ~ b &'~^' c~ 1 ~~ ^- _ _ 1 -^~y ~ /~ V h ~ ' ,+ J /. rF`" ~ ,. ~ ~: ~^~~~ ar~rrd'aranoelyd `,~';"~" Y5z"~ ~ ~?~ ~ ~ ~o ~ R I ~ v ~R 4'~ ~ ~ ~ R- i~ I~ i; i~ l t 1 PICtI~ - 3.90lN N3llOfN . ^~ ~, C i ~ t1g ~~ ~ •: ~~' ~: ~• y a ~oz eti ~~~~~ ~~`~ ~ ~, ~/ ~'~ '~~/ ~~~~ = ry y~~~ ~~ ~ ~ °' `~`' $ ~ its `~ i ~ pt ~ ~.~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~~v~~f ~~ Gi e~~ e~e~ aX ~tf~~~ N~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~ ' ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~~~~~ s~~ ~JRm~ ~~bNNi ~ y1, ~ ~,Z c..~~ ~ ?~~[~I~ ~i Qppp4'{{'99~~~~u 52 q~`'~ ~{u„gb ~ {~u ~' ~Okky et ~~ry1 ~ ~ S66 ~ 2G"~~~[~ <hl~~~y~ '~C~1aQA gel+`p W~t~~~ ~c7S j ~~C~7 2YQ oC ~ ~ 'S 33 ~ ~ ~ ~ Nl ~' 6N ~ J ~ '~0 2 ~u ~_. ¢II~~ InV~t~,, ~ t~. O e~ d~ ~ ~ e~~ ~~~ I e~ H ~ ~ ~ ``=~24 1~~~ z~ ~~ ~v` ~~U~M ~~~VS ~ I lt3 i ~ N~~6~ ~ y~~~ ~ $~`~ 1 I ~~ 4 ~~h ~'C~q w k He ~ ~ K I ~ y O $ ~ ~ 12 ~ Ix~ ~ t ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~~ 3 ~` ~~ v ~~ ~ h ~ a a oy I a I 1 I I~ ~ I .~ x ~~,; ~~ ~ ~.: ~ ~ ~ s, o ~ ~~ teed ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ I ~ I~ ~ ~ I ~w ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ,W. 12~.~a ~ ~ ... MET L'S & BUUNllS llESCRIPTIUN App l_ icajt~ : B<<~k M°Untain Land , LLC oints shown on a plat hereinafter described With reference to the p oint 1 which lies on the southerly the following: BEGINNING at P Va. Secondary Route #679} right of way line of Buck Mountain Road ( Corner of land and which point constitutes the north De d Book 552, page 179) r_onveyed to John C. and Virgie Donahue ( and the northeasterly shown as County Tax CoP t r Tax map3No.598.01-2-27) described in corner of Parcel 2 ( y to Vir inia Asphalt Paving Comguck Deed from Thomas H . Beasley, Jr . at page 312 ; thence leavo ng . of record in Deed Book 1145, 45 18' 34 Mountain Road the followingthenceeN.a62d°d06ta40eSE• 154.55 feet to E. 207,57 feet to point 2; oint 4; thence N. thence N. 59° 54' 20" E. 70.99 feet to p ° 16, 38.' E. point 3; thence S. 32 72° 39' 40" E. 84.55 feet to point o% ~ 28" E• 371.20 feet to 687.20 feet to point 6; thence N. 71 13 oint 8; thence S. point 7; thence N. 73° 20' 44" E. 478.39 feet to p ° 22' 06" W• 16° 39' ~~ 155.51 feet to point 9; thence S. 32 16 E• thence S. 72° 52' 24" W. 109.70 feet to 558.93 feet to point 10; oint 12; thence thence N. 71° 09' 36" W. 173.00 feet to p 68° 45, 20" W. point 11; oint 13; thence S. N, g4° 18' 36" W. 45.40 feet to p 43° 35~ 34„ W 159,20 feet to 171.30 feet to point 14; thence N. oint 16; thence point 15; thence S. 67° 47' 03" W. 632.26 feet to p 19" E N 22° 12' 57" W. 804.54 feet to point 17; thence N. 68° 30° thence N. 22° 12' 58" W • 299 • 99 feet to 50.00 feet to point 18; line of Buck Mountain Road; point I9 on the southerly right of way line of Buck Mountain Road, thence with the southerly rig oint 1, the PLACE OF BEGINNING, Pl. 68° 30' 19,E erimeterl boundary P ontaining 24 .090 acres more or the aforesaid p less; and oint arcel with p LESS AND EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING described 1.88 acre lat; STARTING at references being to the hereinafter described point A the ACTUAL point 2; thence S. 40° 20' 49" E• 236.02 feet to p PLACE OF BEGINNING; thence S. 64° 1feeOltoEpoino•00 thenceoSpo48° B; thence S. 44° 56' 31 E. 161.18 thence S. 62° 38' 50" W. 103.68 46' 25" W. 235.00 feet to point D; oint F; oint E; thence N. 39° 49' S3" W. 237.30 feet to p feet to p 276,44 feet to point A, the ACTUAL PL1~CE thence N. 48° 46' 25" E• OF BEGINNING and containing 22.21 ~ac~reent°tiedrPlats of Cunningzed plat of survey labeled EXHIBIT B F>roppr.ties, Inc. , showing Properunder dateeZ of J anuary •16,p1995. by Lumsden & Associates, P.C., .' J I - ~ ~~ ROANOKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Applicants C/0 Don Day Zoning: Rezoning From I2 TO AR Tax Map No. 98.01-3-99,27,31 ~ . . .~ ... conveyance of said property, all of which will be on form approved by the County Attorney. 5. That this ordinance will be effective on and from the date of its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Altizer to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Flora, Church, Minnix, Altizer, McNamara NAYS: None A OPY TESTE: Diane S. Childers Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Brenda Chastain, Clerk, School Board Carolyn Ross, Clerk, Vinton Town Council Paul Mahoney, County Attorney William Driver, Director, Real Estate Valuation Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Rebecca Owens, Director, Finance 2 r ., ACTION NO. ITEM NO. S AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: November 18, 2003 AGENDA ITEM: Second reading of an ordinance authorizing the donation of surplus real estate, Tax Map No. 60.16-09-10, Vinton Magisterial District, to Habitat for Humanity APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: At the October 14 meeting, the Board approved moving forward with a request from the Roanoke County School Board to donate a parcel of surplus real estate on East Cleveland Avenue, Tax Map No. 60.16-09-10, to Habitat for Humanity. This lot is adjacent to the former Roland E. Cook School in the Town of Vinton and was acquired on July 30, 1955, for $850. The School Board declared the property surplus at their meeting on October 9, 2003, since the property had not been used for any purpose in recent years. The topography of the lot and its relationship with the R. E. Cook School was reviewed, and it was determined that the schools are not likely to have a use for the property in the future. A request was received from the Vinton Lions Club to donate the lot to Habitat for Humanity for one of their projects. The first reading of the ordinance to approve the donation of the property to Habitat for Humanity was approved on October 28, 2003; a second reading and public hearing will be held on November 18, 2003. Mike Altizer, Mike Stovall and Don Davis have spoken with several neighboring property owners. In addition, the adjoining property owners have been notified by letter of the proposed donation and were invited to attend a community meeting on November 3, 2003, at 7:00 p.m. at the Vinton War Memorial. Representatives from the Roanoke County School Board, Roanoke County staff, Town of Vinton, and Habitat for Humanity were present at the meeting. Only three citizens attended the meeting. ,., Attached to this Board report are the following exhibits: (a) Rendering of the proposed three-bedroom home (b) Floor plan for the proposed three-bedroom home (c) Plat showing the location and adjacent properties FISCAL IMPACT: The land value is presently assessed at $16,000. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the second reading of the ordinance. 2 5-~ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMNISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2003 ORDINANCE DECLARING A PARCEL OF REAL ESTATE TO BE SURPLUS AND DONATING SAME TO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY, NAMELY PROPERTY LOCATED ON EAST CLEVELAND AVENUE (TAX MAP NO. 60.16-9-10) BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property, having been made available for other public uses before permitting disposition by sale or donation, is hereby declared to be surplus; and 2. That a public notice regarding the donation of this surplus real estate was advertised in the Roanoke Times & World News on November 4 and November 11, 2003; and 3. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading of this ordinance was held on October 28, 2003, and the second reading and public hearing were held on November 18, 2003, concerning the donation to Habitat for Humanity of the following parcel of real estate identified as: Tax Map No. 60.16-9-10 4. That the County Administrator or any Assistant County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the S- 3 conveyance of said property, all of which will be on form approved by the County Attorney. 5. That this ordinance will be effective on and from the date of its adoption. C~ • I ;, P 1 + ~; ~~YI Sr ~ ~ ~~ h 1: t ~ w~~ l~ ~s Q O z °L Q > 1. O d d ~, ~- ~ w- o Q d ~ ~ ~' EXHIBIT A • i•i i•i -.e~~i.'Zln 3>fonv~ -~ 11N'v'Wni-'1 .~ 1b'll ~1H __. ncH. woo ~~ a_. .1.. ~ ~ i~ 3'o n l ( R r, _ - _ _ ~ i - is Ilii. ; ~i i - - _. _ --- - - - _ , ,;I I: , , - ~ ~, I ~ , '++ , ~ , I ~ I ~ ;I, I;~i . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; i:i u I +i I ,i I : II LA i I,~ I ~ S + ! I . i ; ~ i j I I ~i ~ I! ~' ~ I ' i ~ F--i -- .. i~ I I p `~ ~ ' .; ~, + ~ i sI++i. tl l ~ , I i ' ;,I , ~ II t I ` , a o I ,. ; i i I , . I ~ +, ~ I ~ o ,, ' ~~~ i,i,~~ I;i, ~ ' , ~ ! ~ ~ x ~il~! i ~ ; I, ~~i~~ ,~ +,~ ,I,, I ~I ~; ~ ' j• ; ' i ~: i ' ~ I I ~ a it ~~ I i,I ,ii~;i; ~i ''~li' il!~ . ~I i ; ! ~ Ili ii~:~~ ~ ~, ~,, ';~; ~ l ~ r;;ii~+fii; ~;; ,~ .i ~ ,il -I;; i,~ ~' , . , ~~, i J e a: 0= J EXHIBIT B 1 i r r O 227 . ~ ~ 9. / Sg ~,~~ ; 11.6 4 ~ ~ 305 ~~ Sg 4g 8 % S4' 8 / 7 ' ; 4'7 . ,~ ~/ „~., ~~ ~~ Y L.I . ~ • 5° 308 ~ ~ ~ _' l l o / SI '`•.•~• ~5 / / 316 ; ; ^' L41. 0 7 •••~•• l ~S 320 ~ ~ l ~ 0 ••••• 6S / / l 328 ,° l ~O° ••••••• / 8S 400 ~ ~ j 301 S0 •••••~~ 5° S • ~ ~ 9 Booard ~0° ~ ••••••• i 317 ~ 10 .~' 11. ,~ ~ 339 SS / ~ °0 S° 3 4 325 12 . ~ 401 ~ 4 ,~ / , / ° ~00~ 7 ~ ,014 ~ / 12 / / ~ / 1 _ / / / / 412 / 13 % 40 . ~ 11 / 10 % 9 S° SS I 2 ~choo% Boardl of Roanoke i Co. B 4S lRo/and E. Cgok E/~m. Sc~oo/ ° ° 12 ~s/ • / % , / 3 9 . 404 / 11 / ~5 •••••• ~ i oa d/ ° ~ i ••••• l of ~ 38./ o / 41 S° ••~~•• R sok Co. 408 i ~ ~ 37. ,~ 307 ~A ~ 5° ~,~ •~~••~ EXHIBIT C ~ ~/ / .. .., % ~s0 / •••r-~ ~ 402 1~ . • >> ~ 1 S° % cn S° 3g ~~ ~ ~6 ~ ~b 2 / ~ 315 11.a, .s_ ~v. ~ t ~~. ~+ BOIIK 395 Pac~209 33r1 THIS DEED, Made and entered into this the 21st day of Junes 1948, by and between MARGIE C. WILSON and W. RALPH WILSON her husband, parties of the first part, and WENDELL R. GRIFFITH and NELLIE L. GRIFTITH, husband and wife respectively with the right of survivorship as hereinafter provided, parties of the second part. W I T N E S S E T H TART FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the sum of EIGHT HUNDRED 0$800.00) DOLLARS cash in hand paid by the parties of ~e second part unto the parties of the first part, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, the said parties of the first part do hereby BARGAIN, SELL, GRANT AND CONVEY unto the parties of the second part as tenants by the entirety and unto the sur- vivor of them, their assigns, and the heirs and assigns of the survivor forever in fee simple, with GENERAL tip,RRANTY OF TITLE, all that certain lot or parcel of land, with all the appurtenan- ces thereunto belonging, lying and being in the Cave Spring Magisterial District of Roanoke County, Virginia, and more par- titularly described as follows, to-wit: BEGINNING at a point in the Cave Spring Road (Virginia Route 119) at about one mile northwest of Cave Spring the northeast corner of the property of J. T. Engleby (formerly Charlotte Temple property); thence with the northerly line of the Engleby property, S. 53 deg. 43 t'~• passing an iron pipe at 19 feet and following the existing boundary line fence, in all a total dis- tance of 392.4 feet to a point in the centerline of 50 deg. 24 a branch thence up said branch, N. W. 115.x+9 feet to a point; thence leaving said branch and with a new division line through 53ddegrc43' E• the property of Margie C. Wilson, N. 434.;06 feet to a point in the Salem-Cave Spring r Ott Roddy thence along said road, S. 29 deg. 2 3 E. 112.81 feet to the place of BEGINNINGS contain- ing 1.06 acres, more or less, as shown on plat prepared by C. B. Malcolm, S. C. E., dated April "12, 1934, hereto attached for recordation, and BEING a part of the property conveyed to the female grantor by deed from Mary Joseprecorded Crockett et vir, dated February 27? 1937, in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court for the County of Roanoke, Virginias in Deed Book 245 at Page 4-l . t -.'° , ~UCUMENiARY ..- I ;' .~ \R1 ... ~ :.. 4,~1L ~~ .. .lO CENTS lO, ~oo~ 395 ~~c~21Q -2- TO HAVE AND TO HOLD unto the said parties of the second part jointly during the ter:~~ of their joint lives and then to the survivor of the said parties in fee simples it being the intention of this deed to convey to the said parties of the second part as tenants by the enrirety~ with the right of survivorship as provided by Section 5160 of the Code of Vir- ginia as amended. THE SAID PARTIES OF THE FIRST PA RT covenant that they have a right to convey the said property in fee simple to the grantees; that they have done no act to encumber the same; that the said grantees shall have quiet and peaceable possession , of said property free from all encumbrances; and that they, the said parties of the first party will execute such further assur- antes of title as may be requisite and necessary. WITNESS THE FOLLOWING SIGNATURES AND SEALS: - - .. .. ._c-e~ ~ ~ SEAL ) MAR IE C WILSON ' --~~-~~-?'~''L SEAL ® ~~ /~ ~ W. RALPH WILSON STATE OF VIRGINIA CITY OF ROANOKE ~ a Notary Public in and for the anoke, State of Virginia, do hereby cettify that Margie C. Wilson and W. Ralph Wilson, her husband, whose names are signed to the foregoing writing bearing date of the 21st day of June, 1948, have acI{nowledged the same before me inmy City and State aforesaid. Given under ~y hand this the day of Junes 1948. .. MY COMMISSIQN EXPIRES ch,/ ~ ~ ~ yam'/ O~ ROANp~~ ~ ~ p z ~ °v a 1838 DIANE S. CHILDERS CLERK TO THE BOARD Email: dchilders~co.roanoke.va.us C~uix~~ of ~n~t~.aC~e P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018-0798 (540) 772-2005 FAX (540) 772-2193 November 19, 2003 BRENDA J. HOLTON, CMC DEPUTY CLERK Email: bholton~co.roanoke.va.us Roanoke City Council, Members Mary F. Parker, Clerk, Roanoke City Council Salem City Council, Members Forest Jones, Salem City Manager Vinton Town Council, Members Carolyn S. Ross, Clerk, Vinton Town Council Wayne Strickland, Executive Director, Roanoke Valley-Alleghany Regional Commission James D. Campbell, Executive Director, Virginia Association of Counties Attached is a certified copy of Resolution No. 111803-5 adopting a Legislative Program for the 2004 Session of the Virginia General Assembly. This resolution was adopted by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on Tuesday, November 18, 2003. If you need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Diane S. Childers Clerk to the Board of Supervisors Attachment cc: Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney The Honorable Bruce F. Jamerson, Clerk of the House of Delegates The Honorable Susan Clarke Schaar, Clerk of the Senate o~ Ao F z ~ r8~ Board of Supervisors P.O. BOX 29800 5204 BERNARD DRIVE ROANOKE, VA 24018-0798 Joseph McNamara, Chairman Windsor Hills Magisterial District Richard C. flora, Vice-Chairman Hollins Magisterial District November 21, 2003 Dr. Morris Bennett Wtwdlawn United Methodist Church 2922 Corbieshaw Road Roanoke, VA 24015 Dear Dr. Bennett: Michael W. Altizer Vinton Magisterial District Joseph B. "Butch" Church Catawba Magisterial District H. Odell "Fuzzy" Minnix Gave Spring Magisterial District On behalf of the Board of Supervisors, I would like to thank you for offering the invocation at our meeting on Tuesday, November 18, 2003. We betieve it is most important to ask for divine guidance at these meetings, and the Board is very grateful for your contribution. Thank you again for sharing your time and your words with us. it was good to have you with us. With kindest regards, eph McNamara, Chairman oanoke County Board of Supervisors OFFICE: ° FAX: VOICE MAIL: (540) 772-2005 (540) 772-2193 (540) 772-2170 E-MAIL: bos ~ co. roanoke.va. us N N E cD oo rn N d• N ,- ti~~~ r T ~ .- r r ,- N N *- r~~ C'~ co N r N cr? N ~t ~ N d• d' N d N N O c c O ~ ~ ~ O O O) O 'L U •i •(~ C (~ 'C O i- O O O o ~ N m m o ~ >, c ~ a~ ~ E a,o F- ~ ~ ~ 'w U ~. ~ ~ (~ W ~ ~ -o ~ o •" aci ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ai ~ c o~ o Fes- cn ~ > ~ ~ cn N ~ «1 ~ > ~ ~ ~ cn p O ~ _ ~ N ~ 'V O ~ N O J ~ v0, O ~ O LL ~ o0 0 ~ ~ o ~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~ p ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ a o ~ ~ ~ ~ aci ~ ~ `~ E F- .n ~ -a Q ~ ~ E F- O ~ O ~ a~ ~ ~ } ~ ~ ~ m E ~ ~ ~ ~ E .~ ~ E 'c .~ Y ~ ~ Y o 0 E r ~~~- ma c c~ 'c E O o Nam .~ .~ o o> -° .~ ~ X c w> c~ ~~ cn E~ o N a a c E E ~ C O H O (~ .Q 0 0 0 0 0 i •- ~ O O i O L .i O~ •- A N C 'i O O O O O i 7 X X~ N N u> ~ UtLZF-Q-~~NU> W ~~ZZOLLLLdCnCn~~~~~~U~ WU~ W O W W ~~~ a ~ O ~` ~ ~~ c 0 ~ ~ - ~ c ~ 0 0.. N O ~ i 'r 0 O U ~ c m ~ c c~ Q" d m p cn ~ cn ~ ~ ~ c c c w e i~ 0 0 0~~ N ~ ~ .~ i~ is .c c ~ ~ c/) c c c c c o 0 0 0~ •fl- s s~ 0 0 U ~ ~ ~ .0 0 0 •o o c ~ ~ ~ m c > > > cn <n cn -c rn ~ N •c c v ~ v v v a> a~ _ ~ O co N ct3 c c ~ cn ~ w ~ cn N •N (A fA ~ N N cQ a~._ i ~ i i ~ ~ O (n N O (SS ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1i i ~.i_, CSS C~ ~ J_ N N N ~ N ~ ~ N (~ ~~ C Q Q. Vl (n In (n (n C C U U U U p (A .N <A f~ (~ ~~ '`- U U E O D U U U U ~ > ,~ ~ w - Y -Y 'cn E E c c c c c •~ •~ c c c c c ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ a~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :c -o c •c ~ ~~ ~~~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0~ ~~ o~ o 0 0 0 o a~ m ._ ,~ r. •- •- 0 0 0 o m a~ Q Q Q m m m m m U U U U U U U D DLL LL. LL LL C`3 2=_-- J J J~~~ (n >>~> C d C C. d O ~ d r > ca ~ O ~ ~ O C O U 0 N f~N1^^CTTO I~(~^1CYO1 r ~' ~ 1O~ t.C) ~ In C~ CO r- N N r ~'Oa, ~ N C ~ d'dy' ~ 000 dam' '- r r C'7 N N r ~ r r T T u/ V• W ~"I T y' ~ ~ O W r V N T T N +- N ..._ r T O C7 r 1~ N d' C7 O y--~ `\ O ~' T O ~ O '~ C N - ~ C (6 N ~ U ~ 0) 03 Q) U m V) N 03 ~ C C N ~ ~ O +. O ~ O N 0.. ~ ~ ~ - v7 C O C O p 0 N C d v v ~ O cn O O +. 0) ,C c 0 ~ i O C . C C ~~ U p p 0 C N ~ .. U~ -O (~ O •- U Cn (n ~ .C C Q Q d. ~~ (A U O > C O O U U d (lS N N O O C L 4) ~ i Q ~ U~ ~ Q C N N U i ~ + ~ ~ ~ U i- j (A Q U .Q .. O (~ ~ C "', '+ C C ~ c C *' p Q ~ U U7 Q Q ~ U C ~ ~ ~ ~ Z Q" 01 ~ 'O ~ ~ . O O O C C Q~ G O C ~ L 4) O O ~ ~n cSf Rf j "p 'O . ~ ~ •U ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ..+ "-+ (~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 O C ~ N 03 (~ N , A / ~ O O N O 0S 03 ~ C C 4) O O O U V7 ~ U 03 03 03~ N _ _ ~ ~ 03 ~ (~ <i ~ •~ ` ~ C C U Q Q 'O ~ > t. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U .U '~ .p 0 ~ O ~ ~ (~ N N p "O ~ 4) ~ O ~ ~ Q ~ • O C O C (~ O ~ C C C N O U U N N O p C O O p O O L L ~ O "a O~ O O O~ ~~~CnCn~UUJZZa.dd~QULL,Z~~(n~~UJ O CO C3-OiC3~ O..U H~~~ ~ C O = ; U N O U ~ 0 (n lA (n Ul u7 N (A N C C C C C C C C C '- L i L L L i 07 0~ O O O O O O O O O ~ C~ C C C C~ (!1 O N O cN~C (OLC N N N N~ N N~~ C C C C C C C (~ ~ O . ~~ C~ U U U U V U U U U U U U U U U U •03 ~ (~ +..-. ,r aCi N 03 *~ cn ~~~ ~ E~j v~~~a~mv~o»a~~v~~~m~~~l-~ cu c~ c~ ~.~ Q ~~ O N v, N ~ ~~~ ~. ctS ccS ctS n3 cis cu c~ cts cts c0 cts c~ c~ c~ c~ n1 -O Q ~ ~ aQ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.Q.n D. Q.. a a Q Y L p p >O O ~ ~ > ~ ~ 7 7 7 O O 'C 03 03 Cd (SS 03 03 f~ (0 4S f~ 03 03 (0 03 C6 (LS 0) J O CD CD m m U U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O O O O O U U U U U O c0 U ~ N •i C d O H o~$ O. O N C O V :+ cII D ~ ~ N d 3 N ~ _ ~ ~ ~ +~+ E o ~ ~ c ~ '~ o N can C~ N a U c T T T T M r T T N N T N CD C7 r~~ ~' N r O *- r N r Ln r~ r C}' ~~~ N I~ N d' N r r~ O ~~' O e~y, O MT ~' o ~ N '~ C O _ ~ C cd N ~ ._ O U ~ N a~ a~~i U a~ c ~ O O C L U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C E C C ~ ~ .~ ~ O ~~ C ~ ~ U O ~ O C U C O~~ "O _ O C N .~ O L to (~ in (,> (~ p> ryM~~ U U ~ U (0 ~ ~ C p m o°'i E o~i °~ ~ ~ °~ °~ _-° ~- ~ a~i E E °~ m ~ E- ~ t ~ O ~ ~ ~ ct1 ~ ~ t O c~ Q O cC $ ~ .~ ~ O (A CA U (n Q (A O f- Q U D = Cn U ~ (n Cn > ~ L ~ O) D) 7 7 O) O1 ~ ,C O O cn cn c c p„ a >- >- _ U U ~ L •- (~ !n C ~~~C~~~~~~~ ~ L L ~. c .a .a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o o O O O .~ ~ O ~ cn O O ~ -~ ~ cn ~ cn ~ O N N ~ ~ cn '~ "~ "~ ~ ~ O O m a~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ m a~ m m ii ti tiC~C~~~F'~f` m maa~u~in~nv~u~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Y i Y i Y Y Y ~ Y Y Y Y C C C C C C C C L Cd ~ (0 (~ ~ c~ (~ ~ c~C c~ cv .m m ~ ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~a~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ E .~ 0 H c 0 ::. m d U N Y lII ~. .Q U O C. N "- ~ ~ . N j ..r p ~ ~ O O C C C ~ ~ C O N Q U X O N 'D O O) ~ ~ ` N ~ L ~ Q~C ~ p ... N -O N O C ~ (~ U~ N U O O j ~ +-~ J ~ ~ O N -Q ~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ ~ ~ O i 0) ~ C N O ` ` ~ 0 0 - U N ~ ~. ~ U p ~~ N ~- (~ C ~ O C •~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ N N tD O ~ ~ O L ~ Q. O U O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p- ~ O ~ N ~ C ~ O ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ O cOn ~ ~ ~ ~ 'n ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~C p (C ~ ~ ~ V '~ > 0 0 0 0 ? ~ ~ n ~ -a a ~ ~' ~ `~ >~ ~ ~>J0 2 2ZS QCn i > ~> =.JJ~(A F-~ ~ ~ N fn In lp fA ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a a ~ ~ ` c c c u o 0 0 ~ ~ ~ a~ m a~ ~ ~ a> a ..... ~. 0 0 ~ m a~ m m m m m ` ~~ N ~ >, >, o o _ _ .c ~ m a~ a~ ~ a~ m m ~ m m a~ m m ~ ` ~ ` ` ` ~ m ~_ ~ ~ LL LL ~ ~ ai (n ai Cn i a (n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ >` m ai > >~ > Cn (n > ~ > > ++ O >+ ~ _ ~ = ~ ++ N ~ N ~ r r ~ a, r ti Q O ~~ ~CC ~ C N ~ ~ ~ •~ C C (~ N Q O U~ m (~ O U a~ U N L O N ` (~ O i ~ ` U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~c~ ~= ~ ~ ~ ~ C • N O_ ~ O ~ ~ ~ p N O ~ Q N N N y O U L ~ A• W C •C U L ~ O Y~ ~ 1 ~ C~ Q ~ i C ~ ~ N ~~ ~ pI ~ .,. N ~ N .. y_ i 0 p~ U CA ~ c • ~ N O ~~ ' O C~ ~ x O ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~ o •. •~ C H ~ N m ~ ocn ~ '~ ~ O ~ W ~ N f~ (A U ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ y~ ~ ~ C p ~ ~ O O ~ i ~ 3 _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ _ ~ CB ~ C C ~ O . C ~ ~ 0 ~ Q ~ ~ C (/) ~ U > ~ ~ > ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ i O ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ Q~ ~EE E EE~ m ~~~~ ~ ~ , U~ ~ ~~ C~ (/a c ~ i ~mRm W V ~ N i i a a U U . .~ ~ E E E E E E N N ~ Cn E E E i N N 0 0 N O N N N O O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .a ~ ~ ~ ~ C C ~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N `~ ~ a. d ~ d a. ~ ~ ~ 0.. i m i a a ~~~~~ N O N L N N ~~ U ~ f>SS (0 f>4 C~ (~ >~>~~ (~ ~ CO ~ (>~ > (~ ~ ~ ~ ~_ _ ~ LLLLJ d 3 V W d c0 ~ ~ 0 ~ +~+ ~ ~ ~ ~ *~+ r~+ C .~ G1 ~ t0 *'' f!1 LL fn C'3 y w 0 t ' ~ ~ _ _. ' ~ , j °. , _ 'i ' ~ ~ ~ ;~ %L ~,q 3' r~7 Q _ < y + N ~"_-'~ ~ 1 O -~ ~': ti 7 N ~ j ~ e ~~ ~ ~; ~•? o . i ~j ~ ~ n ` '~ ~ 'r W ~ ~~;i ~ ,,, ~, ~": ' ~~ ~~ ''F s ` ~ ~ : , _, ci m ; pf~ tD c~ ~..~' ~ ~ Q~ a 4 ~. ~ O C O ~ ~ ~0. G :D O O .O ~ 'OOl \O. 40 O ~O 0~ O~" !O .O O O O" V'. O` O) O O` ~'' ; O] ~ h.. r- li l O O O O ( ~ G O DO ~ D ~ ` O ~ O O O C O G O Q~ O O I'~ O CO O 'q; 0 O rp i.Ci . O ~ -, ~.~~~.. ix1 .,,- t. ~ N r . ~. SJ O O O N. O ~ 6 w Q tt7 N M 1~ M~ r4 O. C^i O l[l N O N. O O.. O Q. tt~ C' 0 1.C7 tf?. ~ C~? 6) I~ - ' ' O O O ~ . N O O V'.. O O rf7 O O O O ~ O . V`: 6>. N ~D'J tY' OD ~ ~ . C O. SD * N 7. ~ N: Q C ~ `~ r ~ ., iN ~ - ,'. v .Q.. c O r' 1!J r.> V C"7 N N ~ r.[ i ~ t!'i O O'i O O ~ O O r.0 ~ `S N CO m d. L.fl.. ~ h-. qJ Q~ O 05 [~7 M ~.Cj ' ` r ~k _ N IOf] N C O ~ ~ O~ m Cs CS] CO ~ C7 a •-- ti b N r9 O ~ N~ N: b nl c~"i C^"J ~ ~ O ~. , r O N~ N _ Q' ~ ' l ~ ~,i r ~. ~ 1 ~- .+ a , ~ E ~`. `~ a ~~ ~ ~i I p ~, ~ O ~ _ ~ a _ ~ ~+.. ` ~ ~ ` r ~ = ~~ ~ w .111 ~ C C ?.+ ~+ A N O C 16 .. UI ~ u1 ~ N. O r C o y . 14 G! t '~' t U C a •~ ~ H ~ ~~ _ Y ~ J ~ N V a . N a ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E Q 1 w C c~ r a o ~ ~ G o '? 1n w w a ° '~ a ~ v a v s~ ~ E a ' ' °i rn y ¢ ` ' ~ ` a , ,, _ 's a~~ a m o ~ a c a ° ' ~ , ~ ' y Z ` J a _ s o - lo-: s = ~ 1 - o O ~ o a Y !L Z _ ~ O = U = U 7 ' v o ~ Y ~ ^ o ~ - .~ N ~ 0 = U r Y L1 ~ a ^ v , ~ ~ 3 V O: ' r ~ ~ . ~ a m i 91 W~~ C U a_ N~~~ ;O W.. 01 ~' O W N w W 1C ~ _7 m. to d C O~~ C T C s ~' C ~O Y ~ , 1 O c . 1 -, rr a 111 O T 'O C: C ~ 1n W A C , > a ~ C UI ~~ C 'Q W a Z ~ f6 a 10 14 4 ~ ~ 111 ti~ 6 / 6 l 3 L s T f O ~ - E C C C rG Q Q Q Q Q m m m m U U U ^ ^ ^ W W C9 C9 C7 -'~ la -~ b a a a O O O O ~ -7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Y J J ~ ~ m ~; L O v, S ~. _ _! w - .- w w is w w w '~ w .- w ~ a w a w ~. w .- w w~ w .a w w ,- w ,~ . ~. . .~. .~, w w w N 1 ••O~r~ i G V ~\ O O ~O .O O O O ~ ..? O O ti0 O\ .,O O O c'o1°r~ivmon`~.o~,o°~°~-,o~ooo 0 0000 O ~° `O G O O ~~ O ~'. O oo°av° woti ewe=o'` o00 o o N ~ ~. `.! - Q1 ~ ~ R KJ _ ~~ a._oOf~.,~,.~ohoro~oooooooo~,oo o o o oo~~.,~oti r r ~ . . r -^ ~ ~ a ~ ,- r r r ' ~ ~~~ ~ ~ - 3 ~ .u ~ V r O N ,..T N C? r ~ N '~T ~ W~ t`~ 00 4? N N r` ~ - r ~rJ ~_ ~ r_`t_ ~ O ~~ ~ N _ .. ~" ~ y} ~ _ ._ ' P :' ~~-~ a ~ ` Ji Q~ ~ ~ .~ ~ N O O ~ ~ y N ~ ~ '- ~ N ~ es .rte,- ~ t ~ e ~ ': N N u U F i v - f~ cn o j Q,d~` 1.~ ~ w ~ ~ m ~ m ~ r ~ ~ N C C]. C p ~~ a w to C ~ 6i O ~". ~~ ~, ~. ++ N O O to N O (6 O Q. . ~ Ci3 C J ~ a~ .. E ~`+ ~ ~ O ' > ~- ' w.-. ~ : C. O O tv ca aozU~~ ~ ~- ~;~^ `x~; r,,~ ~t~~ <' Q i N S l~ c 0 c a~ W i .~'~ I ~ i I i ccs i a~ CA ~. ~_^, ~~9 a ~ O ~~ (~j ~ ~ cV O N O O O O 4CJ ~ u Q N. _~~ _~~ w C ` Q' iCi ~ m O ~ ^ O O C.p ~ ~7 7 N (O O •-- O~ M O SD CYJ ~ O O a, _ ~ 1 i I ... •~ 7 1 .. a r a l ^ .. a,~ c a ' L' O~ C~~ a~ Q. N Z Qrnto¢oo~in n~ ~ o2UZYtLS ~ a`1= 'O 'O ~ a ~ = al a w+ !~ L C > > > ~ a ~ O ~ C ---- t >, ra ~a ~a v ~ rn a ~ a R; N ~ ! .,,o .,.o .,o ,. ..o ~ CIO ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0~ 0 0 a ~' ~~T O N at .-- N r N M ~- ~ N V' <- y 'l~ m O o ~ ~ •o ° 'O `°°~ o° ° a ° •~~ N O N O o 0 0 `-` ~ LCi ~ O O M O~ O~ 0 0 0 0 CO CO M lCJ O I~ O `~ O N ~ O~ V' O~ ICJ ~ O N O~ O~ CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 CO O ~ ~ ~ ~ ('J u'~ O ~ M (~~ ~ N 4Ci ti ~ O ,- N N i.i') ~" r_q O - N W N O (V C'i Cj ~ '~ O ice- r~~ O O CV r M~ a Y r C R a .~ L o p '= L a tl C ~ G '~ ~~ Ol y io 0 ~ a •~ w c ~ a `m E ~ ~ a a o ~ °; ~ ~ ~ o •n ~ y T ~ in ~~ C v a a t ~ a a •R ra ra ~s a~ Y ~ E p a ~ •~» ~» ~ Y J J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z C I-- F- F- ~ a • a • • • s • • • ~ • • .- • • • • ~ • • • '~° ,o do •9 ~'O. o o '.o `~ o .o c' o o° c~° .o o .o P o O'"~ ~~ O `~ O `c'~ O O O o~ O O ~~ O ~ O ~ O ~ 0 0 0 O h ~~ 0 0 0 0 O N rr? O I~ rye 00 Q7 ~, ', N 'V' ~ N 'O a v y W C a 7 O Q~ ~ { ) j ~ CJ. ' - ~ r"'"- N ~ ~ ~ Q. O N i_p J L N ~ ~- cD ~ N ~ ' ~ y . 7 N r+ ~ C ~. p 'D C ^. J J C ~ ~ p m= ~ E ~ ~ tl- G J ~ ~ a o ~ a ~_1 ,A LL en Q~ Q1 V ~. y . ~{ ¢~ ~ ~? cn , a ~~ c 0 N i X W ~~ L Y U C ~ ~ N ^ '' Vl A~S1 J V C ? ? ~ Q .~ V ~ Q. _..... _........ .~ .Q ~ _ ~ Z Q ~ ~ 7 ~ (~ N r L U w N ¢ ~ _ U d a d 16 V 0 ~ U ~ - v ~ ~ c ` ' ~ Q o ' .-. O t . . L d~ ... `_. Q~ ~ ~+ ~ 0 . ~+ y X ~ QI ~ ` ` _Z `- w N £ N z' ~ ~ w QI d ~ Y ' __..... _.__ . E N ~ ~ ~ N L N IG _~ ~ ~ T T '~ ~ O V 01 3 7 7 O. QI 14 :oZO V1¢-~-~~Q~u.~ N o CI O V W 7>>~ Q. N d b OZOv14-~~~Q~~~ __ j,~ N a a a a a a~ a a a a . N a a a a a a ~- a s s a a _ ~ , ' _ ~ ~r ~ro~noOmmr~rtr M N N~r~oorarormv~n o ~ ! ~n In tT C? Q7 LL7 tom. ~ O r'. r~p O Q? ~ O C' N M ('7 '~ m LO O 4'] 07 rt 4k O~ ~ .-- P N 1~ N N CrJ ~S .- N CY? O t~ O O M 4n O N 4 J O O .- C~? •- M V t~'.~ 7' c1' V' In V +-- N Cv:~ N N N (~? N C! C+? S~"i V N N ~ 1~ .` ---' y . U ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ r .. C~ b N~ b O O `N- [a k. ~ m.. ~ L O ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~L_ c4 b~ W N b ~ ~ b S, ~ -- '~'v~b,~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~a~a~ 'r~.. H ~ ~' 7 b N + ~. vbi N v=i ~ '~ ~ O ~ ~ b ; v~ m ~' nu ~ ~ ~. d dUQ ' ) OO~~c s; Q O w F-- Z~ W Y O N y C C 0 4~ (0 a W f0 AGENDA ITEM NO. PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given three (3) minutes to comment, whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at al( times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD ~-- ., NAME: ~;~ ~~ti~~s" .~ ~--~.J /~ ~~,~ ADDRESS: ,~ ~ ~~' 5~.~~~ ~ ~i PHONE (OPTIONAL): ,~~~(~ -` ~~,~ ~ ~~~~' GROUP/ORGANIZATION: .~"Mt ~ ~ aeY APPENDIX A-ZONIlV ORDINANCE § 30-100-10 Sec. 30-100-6. Public Utility Lots. (A) Well lots, tank lots, stormwater detention area lots, utility pumping station lots, and similar types of .public utility lots may be created in compliance with the terms of this ordinance and the Roanoke County Subdivision ordinance, notwithstanding the frontage, width, area, and other design standards for lots found in Article III of this ordinance. Any such lot proposed for platting, shall be clearly designated on a subdivision plat reviewed and approved by Roanoke County. This plat shall contain notations and covenants that clearly restrict the use of the lot for the above cited purposes. Further, the plat shall clearly indicate that no employment shall be allowed at these lots except for the. routine and necessary maintenance of the public facilities. Sec. 30-100-7. Corner and Double Frontage Lots, Orientation of Yards. (A) On corner and double frontage lots, the front shall be determined by the administrator. A rear yard shall always be opposite a front yard. Sec. 30-100-5. Establishment of Sight Triangles. (A) To promote visibility for pedestrians and the operators of motor vehicles, a clear sight triangle shall be established at the intersecting rights-of--way of any two (2) public. streets. The legs of this sight triangle shall be twenty (20) feet in length. They shall begin at the point of intersection of the two (2) street rights-of--way, and shall extend twenty (20) feet along each right-of--way line. The triangle shall be formed by connecting the endpoints of these two (2) lines. (B) Within this sight triangle nothing in excess of three (3) feet in height shall be constructed, placed, or permanently parked. In addition, no vegetative plantings within the triangle shall be allowed to grow to a height of greater than three (3) feet. (C) Nothing in this section shall imply the necessity of removing obstructions within this sight triangle, provided that these obstructions were installed or planted prior to the effective date of this ordinance. Routine trimming of shrubbery violating this height requirement shall be required, if the trimming will not endanger -the health of the species. _.. `_ Sec. 30-100-9. Location and Desiga of Fences. (.A) Except as provided for in Sections 30-92 and 30-100-8, fences may be constructed in any location, on any lot. (B) On any lot occupied by a residential use type, fences located in front of the building line shall not exceed four (4) feet in height. -- Sec. 30-100-10. Standards and Procedures for Review of Condominiums. (A) A subdivision plat shall be submitted to Roanoke County for any new residential, commercial or industrial condominium development, including the conversion of any existing development to the condominium form of ownership. This plat shall meet all Supp. No. 5, Rev. 1934.5 0~7 (C AGENDA ITEM NO. PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~``/`1 0 c~ ~U ~~~~ ~ I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given three (3) minutes to comment, whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of hislher point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~.~ _: ~ ~ ~~~s~~ ADDRES~ ~ a ~~7 ~ r ~r~ PHONE (OP\~AL): J~~~ ~"~`~-Z ~~ GROUP/O RGAN I ZAT I O I~: 6~ /~j '~O/ZC /w Xi ~s AGENDA ITEM NO. PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE CITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJEC7~~__ / ~ X I would Pike the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given three (3) minutes to comment, whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at al( times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ~-r~ ~,t--~=,~.5" ~~ ~.~V//l ~~~ ~ ADDRESS: ~ ~~~ , ~ ~`~-'~~' ~ ~ ~'~ PHONE (OPTIONAL): ~`r~ --~ ,~i ,% ~ ~/ ~ GROUP/ORGANIZATION: 6 AGENDA ITEM NO. PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE (/EITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJE~r~'V,~~e~-~a(I~~ w ~ _9~-h~l (° l.Nce~a.e.~ - - - I would like the Chairman of the Board of ~upeivisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given three (3) minutes to comment, whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME:~V1Yl~~~-1~.Y (O,P ADDRESS: CI~/`6j~A/~~~y,~"~ P/hD ~~Y~7w~ PHONE (OPTIONAL): ~f~~~(D~ GROUP/ORGANIZATION:~~. ~JEtk~~.t (1r-> Yk~~. ~'1C~L~~y.Z,~'~F,tp„ Q-~,. AGENDA ITEM NO. PUBLIC HEARING -ORDINANCECITIZEN COMMENTS SUBJECT: I would like the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to recognize me during the meeting on the above matter so that I may comment. WHEN CALLED TO THE LECTERN, I WILL GIVE MY NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. I AGREE TO ABIDE BY THE GUIDELINES LISTED BELOW: ^ Each speaker will be given three (3) minutes to comment, whether speaking as an individual or representative. The Chairman will enforce the rule unless instructed by the majority of the Board to do otherwise. ^ The speaker will be limited to a presentation of his/her point of view only. Questions of clarification may be entertained by the Chairman. ^ All comments must be directed to the Board. Debate between a recognized speaker and audience members is not allowed. ^ Both speakers and the audience will exercise courtesy at all times. ^ Speakers are requested to leave any written statements and/or comments with the Clerk to the Board. ^ Individuals speaking on behalf of an organized group shall file with the Clerk written authorization from the group allowing the individual to represent them. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY AND GIVE TO THE CLERK TO THE BOARD NAME: ADDRESS:~~c~~ ~(_!7t~'L~+J l~ /' ,~ ~~~r PHONE (OPTIONAL): GI~~ ~jG~ GROUP/ORGANIZATION: 6 ' ~ OmO N O W OO mO Qi 0101 OT O01mOO~ fA 01 m W O_OO N NN_ W NN_N N_N_N N__T On7 em N_ N_~ N_N_ mN_ N_ N__N N_ N O O N O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N r N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N n IJ ~• w w Y Y Y w YY 000 O O O O ~ O w ¢ Q Q ¢ ¢ 4 Q Q > > m U ¢ K ~ ~ > > 7 > > _~ > > > > > > > > > > ~ > > > > > > ~ > > ~ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > N Y Y Ivi (q ~ U U Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y~ Y Y Y Y YJj g Y Y g Y Y Y Y~ j Y Y~ Y Y Y Y Y X Y Y Y y00J Z~~~ OOOOO~OOOOOOOZOZOOpO0000jpOOpO000zNOOZ000000000 ~ Q Q ~ J N N N ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ n ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ Q ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ .W..1 N ¢ ¢ O ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ O ~ ¢ ¢ O ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ Q~ ~rNiZ OSmoeoro ~~~~ ~oMO~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~OVK~u~~a0'.~~> ~~ ~>~~K~ ~ ~~~~ Z C7 O J J 2 O ~ ~O? Q:~ W' ~ ~~~~~~F!-~~S d' W 0.'~~~ W ~O W W LL W W ° Z ~ LL m W to to fn ~O w~ U m Y O O D U°~ O O~ Y~ U U~ W z~~ O~~ N J Z Z Z Z O]¢°LL' um'>ZZZ a In '~~Oln~¢~~JJ~~JJmQO~~WOR'W W ~W W ~ W ~ W ~~In~ W'~Q' n~R'R'd' W ~ ¢ ° Omi ~ ~ ~ o o WOW } W ~ W W ~ ~ ~ W ~ r2 ¢ ~ w W w ° Q ¢ O O I- ° ° ~ ~ O ~ ° ° ~ ° ° J ° iN O ~ ° ° in W Q O w X 2 2 2 X X W g W° w O w w°°° w°°~ O w°° g o `~ g g~ g g J¢ x Y _J J_ X J_ J d J X J_ _J J J w~ W W 00 W W W OOLv u,~g~~~~000~00~~i ~'tn cn C7~~U'{C7 gC7 U' 2mm022m22Q2 m2222 ~°° p e O Q Q¢ O O ON O N O r N N N~~ N N M M O M N~ lefl a00 me W (G f00 W M~~ O O N N ~ O N~ N O Q O M V ~Wf! 'O In O~ lf> M c N~ M (D M M e e n e e ~ lf7 N m m m 0 O m O O N N M N N Ql r N N N N ¢mmUM a~~~ aammmUmmmm~mmmmmOmmeeeM° ev °~n~nu,ma NIlJtpn.1A~ NLL~ d~n~nu~~n = m O O N 0 0 O t p O m 0 0 t o O N E l fJ n m O ~ Ci O O O O m 0 0 0 0 e O m t p M O m p 1 M O n m m 01 n m O m O n e~ D t CJ • e ~n e eu~n~n mnecoinnnm me m mmo~ ~nn~n nnnrnmn ti mnrnrnn ~rn rn rn rnmrnrn rnrnrnmrnrnmrn rnm m rnrnrn mrnrnrn rnrnrnrnrnm rnmrnrnrnm ~r .- r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r d Y Z W W F- (~ ~ = 2 O ~ 1- F- W ~~ Z F- Z ~ U w ~ =m o ego mU ~ ~ 2 Www~ ~ ~~ ~uW.°~ _~ ¢~w zw ~~ v2io~~ a Wafasw O C LL~ °_°~z otS~ww°p o¢ ~Z °~ ~a~s Z O W O }~ln(not3 fnW ~~ W'2' W W W2'0~ moCW o6¢oty° aZt W°¢~ J m¢O 2 J ~ Q' J C1 W W '» (n C7 ~ Q: 2 otl ~~wwxseuxcZ3~ o-xcnoo w_w v>v~ooZ2°2x~°¢° ~~°rn i-•.as~° ~ m 2O O 2 W W J Z a=¢J W' W' ~~F-~ ° ~JJ¢ ¢ j Z W W J~ W °-, ~ `l1 ~J°~M w ~OJU} ¢2 ¢_}~~~~~c~c~w}~ 2FZZ~~~a w¢ ~~~2W ~ 2~~ ~a¢w°m U z ~~J~OOOOOppz~~WOw~~~~~~~~c2i~~xxu°,~ ;~oo=Q~o~>o~~zQ~a~`~~~o ~~~g~aaaN~~~~oo~°oo~~oz¢wa~o~~w~aZ~O~Om~z~v'i=zoz~W~Oz~~ dmz~¢?zzz~~~cw.>.>~mFp~zz~~~acwi~cW.>~m~Q¢~OW~OmwmO~~z~r-gumi~wUV~-i~~zW CCL }I-S JZ ZZJ»»w Z22~¢O W'SSO~ W W W m O~ 02~ F- ~~ J 3 ¢ ¢ O r O - - - O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O p p R ~ ¢ ~ ~ ~ w O 2 - ¢ ~ w w w 2 ~ O w } - ~ w - o02m~n2~~~2mmmm~cnU2~~000UmmmJ~~3~cnic9mcnx~nr-~rn2~~cn~Y¢~¢LLCnW~ x N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y W W W W W W W W W W 2d'~~~Q'KR 2' Q'd'd' W'2_2_22 ~_ W W W W W W W W W W ~OOOOOOOOOWOOOOOOOOJJJJJ JJ O~~~cC~CLm~~~ E~ ~j » J» 7~ J~~~)~~~~ J J J J J J J ~ U U U U U U U U U U c ~ ~ 2 ~ 2 2 ~ ~ ~ QO d' ~ 2 ~ Q' d' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W (~ (~ W O° O ^° D O D ~~ U N ~ m U U U m ~ Y U U m N ~ m ~ ~ ° ° ° ° ° ° ° N _J _J J_ J_ _J J J_ _J J_ _J _J _J J_ J_ J_ J 'p W W W W W W W W W~ W W W W W W W W J J J J J g J J g W g g g g g g g g ¢~~~~ ~~~~~m~~~~~~.~~00000 W OO W mC7C~(7C7U` U' C7U(~U' 22 2 222 22 222 2 222 2 p 0 0 0 m 0 0 O N m O m 0 0 O n r tp M 47 01 O O In 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N~ 0 0 If1 M~ N O N O N O e m e N n O O M n I n M L 1 i N N O N N M M M O O m e m M~ N O M N O N r 0 0 Q O M O~ C~tn a e e N M M M M M M M e e e~ e e e m m m m O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N -p m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m e e e e e e 0 0 0 0 ~fJ ~ ifi if) ~~ 0 0 ~ N~ O O O 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O ooogooooooogooqooooo00oooooqooo0oooqoooqoooqooooo00000 O O O O ~' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O r N M e V N (D n N 0 N 07 of O m I~ D] m O N M e 1I7 t0 Ih N m n o7 O r r N (O n m 0 0 N M e O m n m Of O N M e r N N N N N N N N N N M M C ~) M r1 M r7 M O O O O O r r N N N N N N N N N N M C7 (~J M M ~ooooo00000000ooooogooooooogooooo0000000000000000000000 O O O O 0 0 00 0000 0 0 0 0 00 00 0 0 00 0 00 N N NN N N NNd'C <t C' V V• V V ~'V' V ed• v ev v e d N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O ~ pp ~ pp ~ W pp y pj N W a0 N N OD a0 a0 W o7 Dj oD o~ W W c0 R7 07 m 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O cc v e a v e e e e e e v e e e e e e e e e e e v a e e aooooo0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000~00 x . r ,-+ 0 r H 0 r H 0 r H 0 r .-+ 0 r ,-+ 0 r H 0 r H 0 r H 0 r H 0 r H 0 r H 0 r H 0 r H 0 r H 0 [~ (~ Cn N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N f1+ U tp O l0 O 1D O 1D O 10 O lD O ~D O l0 O l~ O \D O l0 O ~O O l0 O ~D O l0 O 3U oa hH m H U p, \O o N O lD 0 N O ~0 0 N O lD 0 N O ~D 0 N O l0 0 N O N 0 d' O N 0 d' O N 0 C O N 0 V' O N 0 C' O N 0 d' O N 0 ~ O N o ~ O N O ~ O Q [i] w q H O N U (Z p~ ~ o ~ N is p~ ~ 0 d+ N i~ 01 H 0 V' N ~K Ol H 0 d' N -K 0~ ~-+ 0 d' N -K Q~ H 0 a' N # N H 0 C' N is N r; 0 ~' N ~ N ~-+ 0 d' N i~ N H 0 ~ N ~K N H 0 C N -K N H 0 a' N i~ N ~-+ 0 ~!' N # N r+ 0 a' N i~ N H 0 cr N it [-~ H ~ Q W m ~~-+ H W ~ W ~ W ~ a W ~ a W ~ a L•7 ~ a cx Q ~ o a Q a Q ~ Q a Q a Q rx Q a Q w w ~ z o zo H z H H (--~ C7 E~ a N a W ~ W c~ o o c~ c~ o a a a a a a a a a ~a x x ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a a a a a a a a a W w H a a a a a a H H H H " H H ` " H x H x H x Cz~ U] Cr., Ci.~ fs~ Cu Ci, Cz. x x ... . ~ ... .~ Ow W O a H q Cs, U1 `J a~ xcn W O w ~t ~ ~0 0 0 0 o i.n vi ~ ~ w r r r rn ~ (1~ W W O O N N N N O O ~-i H H H H ~""~ O " ~' p'., U~ d~ ~ C V' V' d~ H H H H H H H H N , O W E, ~ m m m m m m in u~ ~n u~ ~~ in ui in ~n ~H ~ O OH ~ x ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U U] a H Q G] H H z H z ~ z ~ o z H ~ ° z ~ H H ~ z z O Q H ~ 3 r W h W h ~ a W a O h W 0.' x ~ H z H z ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~' z H w a o z H H ~ ~ cn x x F C/) U H x H ~ ~ fx W Q 7y W H W W F ~ ~ o [_+ ~ ~ ~ C~ O O ~ ~C ~ w x x ?~ H O U W ~ w ~ a a z o ~ z ` o w w x x x x x x o o O H H a Ix H U U F H h F U U cx cz a ~ ~ ~ ~ U] "J ,', H H H H H H ~ W W ..7 x .'~ .7 ~ W ~ ~. .~ ~ ~ m ~ m ~ ~ ~ x x ~ ~ ~ w (+~ '-I 6 o H [~ \ H Q: r~ a w CO N ~, W ° w~ ao o a ~o ..~ ~z ~ - - - - _ e, N ' , x r o r 0 r 0 r 0 r 0 r 0 r 0 r 0 r 0 r 0 r 0 r 0 r 0 r 0 r 0 [~ (7 ~ p,, U1 ~ U N N l0 p N N l0 O N N l0 O N N lD O N N 10 O N N lD O N N l0 O N N ~D O N N ~0 O N N lp O N N ~D O N N ~O O N N 10 O N N ~O O N O U ~ oa H F 3 N a N O o N O 0 N O 0 N O 0 N O 0 N O 0 N O 0 N O 0 N O 0 N O 0 N O 0 N O 0 N O 0 N O 0 N O 0 O W CLQ H O N U a N H O d~ N # N H O ~' N # N H O C N ~ N H O ~' N ~ N H O C N ~ N H O d' N is N H O V~ N is N H O d~ N ~ N H O d' N ~ N H O C N # N H O ~!' N i~ N rl O d' N # N H O ~' N ~ N H O V~ N ~ N H O ~" N ~ FH ~Q W ~~ H a Q a Q a Q a Q a Q a Q a Q a Q a Q a Q a Q a Q a Q a Q a Q m w ~ o z zo H z H H E-I H W U W a ~ ~ '-7 a a a ~] ~7 ~l ~l ~-l a ~ a ~l a ~~ :~ ~a x a a a a a a a a a a a a H H H H H W W i-i H H H H H H " H x H x H ~ ' H x ~" x ~" x Cx, Cn x x x x x ~, . . O C~+ Cz7 O .-7 H Q w v] ~ as x~n W O W ~ ~ N N N O O H H N c~'1 M M In lfl H 1D .--I In ^~ W W W O H H H N N [*1 M Cl W Ul N L(1 N N N N . z 61' U] N N N N ' N Ill N Ln N Ln N Ln N ll) N L(7 L(1 tll L11 Ll1 Lll ~ O Lfl l(1 L(1 ll 1 ~H OH ~ x ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ * ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V v] ~l H Q z H W H H a a m ~ ~ H C7 ~ z a `.4 W a ~ ~ ~ ~ H ~ a H ~ U ~ ~ F U a ~ 3 W ~ ~ 3 W Q rS W w a ~ Z H .a H ~ z H W ~ z ~ a z ~ ~ ~a ~a ~ a O O w z z a H a H a w a h x w h Q x c7 h m ~ ~ h ~ o r H 0 U W o z ~ o H z m cn z z a a z O `~ 2 ~ W H W W H a H ~ O ~ O ~ W ~ ~.' x ~ ~ `~ ~ z ~ a H H ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ w x x x o o H H o w 3 ~ Q Q ~ a [~. 3 3 3 ~ ~ cn u~ h O H r \ H Q'. r~ a W cD N ~ W o w~ am 6 M ' x r ~ 0 r ~ 0 r ~ 0 r ~ 0 r H 0 r ~ 0 r H 0 r ~ 0 r ~ 0 r ~ 0 r ~ 0 r ~ 0 r ~ 0 r ~ 0 r ~ 0 [17 C'J Cn N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ~ a ~ U ~ o ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 3U oa H H 3 [-~ U LL N O ~ ® N O ~ O ~D O N O ~O O N O l0 O N O l0 O N O 1D O N O ~O O N O ~D O N O l0 O N O l0 O N O l0 O N O ~0 O N O ~D O N O \0 O N O a W a a H O N U a N ~ O ~' N N ~ O d' N 01 H O d' N O~ ~ O V' N 01 ,-a O ~i' N 01 ~ O d~ N O~ H O 'C' N O1 ~ O V' N O1 ~ O V~ N Ol ,~ O d~ N Q1 ~ O ~+ N 01 ~+ O d~ N Ol ,-~ O d~ N Ol ~ O C' N 0~ ~ O V' N HH tr1 a W uFi~ F ~ a ~ a a ~ F U * H U ~ x a ~ x a ~ x a ~ a a ~ a Q a a a a a x a x a a a a m w ~w z a a a a Hz o z a a a a a a a a a H° N a a a a a a a a H o ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 r7 a v w G-.~ w H ~ H ~ H ~ H ~ H ~ H ~ H ~ E a x rx rx rx H w v w ,-~ a ~ w m w ~ a x x a a a a a a a a a a u i w c n w m w w w F H H a a a a a a a 0 a o w x w a x w x w cn x x o 0 0 0 0 0 ow w o a x H ww Q w x~ a w 0 W ~ w ~n m ,~ rn ~ ~ ~ ~ m o o ~ H o 3 C0 W W ~O lD H N H N N N M M H H H ~-i N '~ z ~ U] N CV d' C C C' V' a' a' a' M cn M f"1 r 1 O W H ~ lfl Lf1 CO 07 CD N [O CD CD CO CO CD CO CO CD ~ Ea ~ O U cn a H a U) W W ~ o ~ a w m w a H w w ° a x a~ ~ x a 3 H m v i z H ~ x N w w w o w z z H o x H ~ ~ a a U H z ~ rx u ~ w w H .-7 FC W C7 U H tx a H 3 U U) mo w' W h Z ~ a z ~ ~ a . U w . H UI C7 ~ H W ~ 5+ O L.' ~7 3 a ~ 0.' W P' W H a ~ x ~ ~ Cs. ~C U H ~ U l W ~ C7 U C7 ~ ~ E-~ z z 0 U a O ~ ' N R: W W Z ~ ~ F zz tx a Z H W x F W U W U C~ H C7 ~-+ W U cx H z Gti 3 ~-+ 3 3 O U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u a ~ ~ i ~ w ` w ~ a m m v i a i U U a i H o e r ~ H rx r a+ .7 w co N FC A7 o ~ U C7 ~ cxm O w~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ x H H ~ H H o 0 0 0 0 W N N N N N U' U] N N N N N a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U o 0 0 0 0 U 3 Ow H h 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Ei o 0 0 0 0 U N N N N N W O O O O O Q W O~ 6~ Ol 01 O~ HQ O O O O O N U v' c a' a' 'a' N N N N N a [-i H ~ Q W ~ a a a a E a v~ w ~ ~ z o a a a a a a ",Z° H Zi H H H H H a a ~ ~ a a F -+W U W a k a u1 cn u] rn Ul W W H W W W W W w m a a a a a O 'u W O .-7 x F-+ W Cz, Q ~' m a a x r [ jQ W ~ O O M M N ~ [Q W W N N N N lfl O W E-~ O w m co m co £ H m O ~~ x o~ ~ U cn a H Q O itl a w z ~ ° Q o h z ~ H a h ~ U ~ W H ~ u Q a ~ H ~ z w z w ~ x ~ o H H y, a F W U o W U ~+ W a W ° Q z z o o m ° v z z z ~ a H ~ u, ~ x x x z H a o o o ~ a ~ m ~ H e O [~ I~ \ H a m N ~ CA ~ am O W ~o a az e O C fD CD ~~ v N O O W cD ~• v~ O z 0 0 c~ 0 bd 0 a 0 ~ ~ ~ d y ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ . o ~ ~ o ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~• ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ . c~ 0 ~. ~. ~- c~ 0 I--~I C/1 CD e--r ~+ i--~ C/1 C7 CD c~ ~ ~ o ~ p n ' ~ ~ o • ~ ~ vs ~ 0 ,.~' ~ O ~ ' ~ ~ ~' ~ n ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ c~ ~ n ~ O 0 ^~^ i--~~ h--~ h^~ ~--~+ e-~P ~~ ^~ ~--~+ C/1 I--+ • M--+ • C/~ ~.~+ ~-+ V1 v ~~ H-+ ~+ ~-+ 0 C!1 I--+ • ^~ ~--~+ C!~ V 1 M-+ • ~--~+ i--+ C7 C~ CD CD i--+ e--r 7~ 0 a 0 n 0 e~ e~ ~ Mn I 'j ~..r . V1 C~~D ~~ V n M--+ • C ~~ v'1 ~~ 1~ n ~-+ ~1 i--~~+ ~ O ~. ~.. 0 ~-+ i--~ C7 C] c~ CD ~~ l 1 e--r ~~ i--+ e--r 7~ 0 a M--~~ ~. ~ n F..h ~ ' ~ O ~ ~ r+ ~ ~ O CD ~ ~ '-~ O ~ , v1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n CD ~ ~D ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~, ~ ~ ~ ~-h ~ O ~ ~ n ~ ~ ~--~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CD c"'r CD ~--~ • n O 0 ~~ ~' O CD ~ ~ ~--~ ~ ~_ ~ ~ CD ~' ~ CD ~ ~ ~. O ~ ~ ~ ~ CD ~ ~. ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ O C ,~ . ~• ~ O ~- ~ CD ~ ~ O ~' ~ n ~ ~ O CD f'D CD ~ ~ ~ O CD ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CD ~ ~ O ~ ~ CD ,~ ~ O ~ ~. ~~ ~ C!'Q ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ CD r-'- CD O ~ ~ O ~• ~ ~ ~d ~d ° c' ~ ' o ~ c+ 7~ ~ 0 a ~ i vo O (D ~"'~ F~ • rr CD x H~ N^~, ~, 0 N • P'r M..+ • b •~ 0 0 a C~ vc c~ n^ l 1 ~~ ~--+ CD 7~ 0 a ~. O ~ ~. ~• ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CD ~--~ • ~- t f I I 7 ~. ~~ ~ ~. ~. d~ O N O ~. O ~~'~ ~- O C. ~• 0 ~. n ~~r, . r ,~ r ~ ~ ^ F-~ 1, l,E~fi~. _ I' ~~; ' ii ~3 ~I I try! ~~ ~~ f 11 f O ~~ x: k a` it ~' I~i. ~ 1' ~ ~ e #~~#il~,i3 fl {j~ ~ \ t _.. {tt i~~{fi tit :~3 ~ CrQ O k '~~> ~~ ~ .... I ~ r ~~~ '~~{` ~~'~ ~~¢~., his. O 0 C/] ~ D ~ ~ CD ~ ~ ~+ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CD O. C1~? ~ !-~ ~ O ~ ~' CD ~ ~'• ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ !"r ~~ M--+ ~"~ ~ M..~ . !"~ F~+ ^, ~+ `~ O rr ~~ ~.~ T~ ~ • O r ~r O O ~• ~• ~' ~• c~ rr cD ~. n F~ M..+ . M-~ F--r O v r~ rr t'~r 0 ~_ H~ F~ c~ 0 ~. a x 0 v r~ r~ !'ter `r F--~ • rr ~• O Cf4 O ~ ~ ~ ~• ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~. ~ ~. ~ ~ (D ~ -1 ,~ ~-~+ ~ O ^, F~ O ~+ M"~ O ~~ ~ F..+ . 0 h--~ O ~ • ~ 0 ~ , ~ N~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~. ~ r-r- O ~? ~ ~ ~; ~ ~ F--+ ~ • !'~ ~_ ~_ ~• O CD O n ~~ rr O ~• ~4 I ~_ ^N J n CD O O (D O O ~. ~• cD ~. n c~ r"I` 1~~+ F-r • M--+ • N CD f..~ M"'~ ~"~` h--~ ~~ M~+ CD O n~ ~' n O ~- ~--~ . O (D ~--~ . ~--~ • ~--~ • ~"~` P''' ~• (7 r~ CD c~ ~• O cD 0 v rr O CD r-~ C'1 CD ~--~ . O n ~~ rr O ~. ~G i b 0 0 a UG (D O O O O ~-.. ~• ~ ^ ^ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C • cD O -CD-~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ v1 ~ ~ ~ n• ~ C ~~~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O O v~ CD ~' ~ O CD ~ ~ ~ O `~ ~-h 4 ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ '~' O ~ ~ n ~ ~. ~ ~ ~D CAD ~• ~ ~ ~ O ~ o ~ o '~_ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~' CD O '~ ~ ~ v1 ~ ~--~ • n CD n c~ O ~• ~Q ~d O O rD A~ y 0 0 n 0 0 ~. ~. 0 v ~"r F-~ F-+ • P'r ~--~-+ 0 ~--~+ ~~~ M~-+ F 0 ^~-+ ~-~+ 0 F-~- 0 F-r • ~. h-~ Mc -+• M--+ • r...~ ~_ N~ e"r ~• x M~ F--~ F~ • /~~~ V ~f CD 0 ~ ~ C/~ Q,+ CD ~ CD ~, U4 n CD ~p o y ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ • v1 ~ ~ ~ • CD ~ O CD ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ CD ~~ ~ O O ~ C ~ ~ ~ O (~ ~ O ~ ~ (U ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ O ~ ~~ O ~ p (~ ~ ,~ . ~ ,--~ ~ ~ ~.- ~ O ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ c~ ~ C -~ • cD O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~D ~ ~ ~ ~ • `C c~ c~ C p' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~, C ~ ~ ~' ~ ~- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n ~ ~ ~ CD ~ ~ ~ (~ ~ ~ N ~ '~ O ~ ~ ~ O ~ O ~ CD ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O r+ ~ ~ ~ ~ n ~ ~ ~ O ~ ,.~ (~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ,~ C~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~. O ~ v1 ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ h ~ O ~~ ~ ~ N om,,, `~ ~--~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ CD ~ ~ ~ b 0 0 c~ a. C~ w crc a n l 1 ~~ V C/1 e--r CD ~--~ C'~ CD 4' E"3 O l J O O ~, O , ~ `- ~ ^ `J ~r O ~~ ~' V ~ ~ J ' ' ' V ...._d V ~ ~ ~ u r , ^ lTV ~' f''~ V O ~~ ( u O O ~ ,^ ~, J ~ 1 r O v ~ r~ O ' ' J C~ ~uu as J O ~~IVVV ~..- ~+ r~~ r C~ 0 ^~ ~' C~ ~c a a 0 0 ....... o~~ ~~ c~ o ~ o ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ ~. ~ • C I ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~o~ ~o~~• ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~- ~'' ~ Cl~ ~ n n o o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c~ ~, . ~ O ~ o O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ O ~ ~ n ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ C/1 ~ ~ c--r ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ^ ~+ ~"!` M-~ + V 1 ~ ~ ~ O M~~+ M"~ O O 0 O F"'~ /~ ~"~` `y ~ ~ rr M ~ O ~ M~-+ c"'r o , ~ ~ ~ f--~ ^^ ~--~+ ~ 1 h~+ !"'r ~ ~ P'r t'ai` O • M--+ ~+ 0 M^",~ ~0 " ~ !~ t"r ~ ~ 0 rr ~~ . !"" r ~^ ~+ C~ . ~"r ~. F--r • F--r 0 h-~ t~ t~ O x ~o ~~ F~ 0 F~~ rr F--+ • ~ • ~, N O C 0 M--~ ~+ ~ y n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q. ¢ ~ O cn ~ ~~ ~ o o ~ ~ ;~ ~ .~ ~ ~~ ~.~ O ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ p ~, ~ ~ ~'~ ~ o~~~ ~o~c~ c~~~.~ . c~ ~ ~ ~• ~ ~,~~o ~~~~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~~ ~ ~. ~ ~ Oro ~~ ~~ 0 0 c. ~ ~. o ~ ~~ ~ o r+ ~ ~ ~ CD CD °~~ ~~ ~ c~ ~,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CD O ~ ~ ~• ~ ~ ~~CD~~ ~~~~~~ c~ ~~ ~~ 0 ~ ~'~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ d td o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. o ~ v° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ao cro c~ ~ O ~ 0 0 0 ~ (~ e~ ~ C!1 ~ ~ O ~ ~• ~ 0 O ~ ~ ~ ~+ M~+ (~ M"I7 ~ ~ Q I--t ~"; ~ (~ ~, a+ ~ ~• ~"~ ~ ~ • 1--+ • Y a ~+ ~• e--r r--+ C~ 0 c--r I--~ M"'~ C~ CD i~~+ ~-.. N O CD O CD O n !"~ 0 • ^~ ~+ l.~~`.+ F~ N n CD ~--~ • CrR ~-~- CD x ~• ~• ~"'~ ~~ F..~ (D C O (D O n CD b •~ 0 0 a C~ ~+ ~+ r-+ r--r i--~ M--+ C~ 0 i--~ CD .} E =f s'° 3 t~ S: r~ O ~ '~-h O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ n ~ ~ ~ O ~-. ~-~- ~ ~ p ~ ~• ~ ~ ~ ~. C. ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ n ~ ~~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l ~a l 1 l 1 ~ ~ C7 ~--~ C~ 0 CD n ~--~ O W ~ ~ ~ ~• ~ ~ O ~ ~ O ~, ~ ~ '~ v1 ~ O CD ~ ~ CD ~ ~C n ~~ O O ~p ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~. ~ O ~ ~ ~ CD ~ ~ ~ ~ n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ^ P1 ~' ~ N ~ ~~ CD ~ ~ ~ ~ N. ~ ~ CD - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n ~• ~ '~ `~ CD ~ ~.,~ . ~ ~ ~' ~ n O ~; O ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' n ~ O ~ n O ~ ~--~ . • ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ CD ~ ~' ~ ~ CD V ~~~ C CD CD CD CD CD ~. ~• O ---~ . ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ C~ ~. ~ ~ ~ O (~ ~ (U C7 ~--~ O O h-~ ~"r 0 Q n ~ ~ ~ ~p O ~ ~ ~ ~ -~ o0 o • 0 ~ o ~ o' c~ ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 !"r ~ ~~ ~ ~_ ~• ~ O ^~ ~+ ~~••~+ F--+ . 1--+ F-~ C~ ~ ~ CD ~ ~ . CD ~ ~ y ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~. ~. c~ c~ ~ ~. ~ ~ c ~ ~ ~. ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ \ 1 O ~\ 1 ~` ~+ i^ l 1 ~ ~ O C ~--~ • ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~~ ~ c~ ~'- ~ ~, o ~. c~ ~ ~ ~. c~ o ~ ~ 0 C] 0 N n ~--- O CD CD C~ ~• ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ cD ~ r+ O O '~ ~ O ~ CD ~ ~ O ~ O ~• ~ ~ ~ n O ~ O ~ ~ ~ CD ~ CD ~ ~ ~ CD O -~-~ _ CD ~ ,~ . ~ ~ O F--+ • O CD ~--~ • CD ~--~ • 0 n n O N O O O O CD ~. CD n cD O O CD O ---~ • n CD CD CD O C~ vo C~ O CD n ~• 0 CD ~~. r O ^ ~c-i+• ~ v1 • C ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v ~ ~ ~ `~ O O O ~. ~ ~ ~ n CD ~ O x~ ~ `~_ ~ ~ ~ ~--- • ~ ,~ (r4 U' ~~+ ~ ~ n ~ ~• ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~--~ • ~ o ~ CD ~- ~ ~ 0' `C ~ ~. ~ ~ 0 CD ~ C/1 ~ ~• ~ ~, , ~ F.-+ ~ '~ ' v1 ~ ~ • O O ~ ~ O ~ ,__, . ~ ~ (~ ~ ~ ~ r-t- ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,..~ . ~ ~ ~ o c~ ~. O d~ ~• O n CD c c~ n J O O O ~C O ~. ~ ~ y ~ ~' ~c ~ ~' ~ o ~ ~ a ''~ `~ ~ n ~ O n c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~D ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `~ ~ o ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ • CD '~ ~• ~ ~ U' O ,.~ ~, o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~• ~ ~ o c~ o N ~ ~--+ • ~ CAD ~ ,__, . ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ c. ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~~ o ~ o . ,~ c~ 0 0 ~. 0 O c. ~. 0 ~. ~. ~. c~ c~ N ~. ~. y ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ c~ ~ . ~ ~ o a '~ Cfq ~ ~' ~ ~; c~ ~ O c~u o O ~ ~ a ~ ~ a (~ ~ O n ~ ~ ~~ n ~ ~• CD ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~~-h ~ o ~d ~- . ~ ~ O ~ ~ O o ~ ~ ~ O Diane Childers RE: Jeffrey Glick; Buck Mtn. Land, LLC Page 1 From: Martha Plank <Martha.Plank@Roanoke.com> To: 'Diane Childers' <DCHILDERS@co.roanoke.va.us> ~ ~~~ 3 -d3 Date: 11/2/03 12:54PM ~ Tr Subject: RE: Jeffrey Glick; Buck Mtn. Land, LLC p5G Hi Diane. have this ad scheduled for Nov. 4 and 11 -cost is 159.06- Thanks LEGAL NOTICE~~ROANOKE COUNTY~~BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, November 18, 2003, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Jeffrey Glick to rezone .81 acres from R-1 Low Density Residential District to C-1 Office District in order to operate a general office located at 2415 Electric Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Community Development, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: October 31, 2003Diane S. Childers, Clerk (2249060) Martha Fisher Plank The Roanoke Times Legal Advertising Rep. Ph.: 540-981-3440 Fax: 540-981-3415 Email: legals@roanoke.com > From: Diane Childers > Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 11:23 AM > To: legals@roanoke.com > Subject: Ads: Jeffrey Glick; Buck Mtn. Land, LLC > «File: 11-18-Community Development.doc» > Martha, > Attached are two legal notices to be published on November 4 and November > 11, 2003. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact > me. > Diane S. Childers > Clerk to the Board > County of Roanoke > Phone: (540) 772-2003 > Fax: (540) 772-2193 Diane Childers - RE: Jeffrey Glick; Buck Mtn. Land, LLC ~ ~ Page 1_ i From: Martha Plank <Martha.Plank@Roanoke.com> A ~~ "3'd3 / To: 'Diane Childers' <DCHILDERS@co.roanoke.va.us> Q~ Date: 11 /2/03 12:58PM Subject: RE: Jeffrey Glick; Buck Mtn. Land, LLC This runs Nov. 4 and 11 -cost is 163.88. Thanks Diane LEGAL NOTICE~~ROANOKE COUNTY~~BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, November 18, 2003, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Buck Mountain Land, LLC to rezone 1.88 acres from I-1 Industrial District to AR Agricultural/Residential District in order to construct single family dwellings located on Eagle Crest Drive, Cave Spring Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Community Development, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: October 31, 2003Diane S. Childers, Clerk (2249061) Martha Fisher Plank The Roanoke Times Legal Advertising Rep. Ph.: 540-981-3440 Fax: 540-981-3415 Email: legals@roanoke.com > From: Diane Childers > Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 11:23 AM > To: legals@roanoke.com > Subject: Ads: Jeffrey Glick; Buck Mtn. Land, LLC > «File: 11-18-Community Development.doc» > Martha, > Attached are two legal notices to be published on November 4 and November > 11, 2003. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact > me. > Diane S. Childers > Clerk to the Board > County of Roanoke > Phone: (540) 772-2003 > Fax: (540) 772-2193 '..Diane Childers Ads: Jeffrey Glick; Buck Mtn. Land, LLC Page 1 I ___ _ From: Diane Childers To: legals@roanoke.com Date: 10/27/03 11:23AM Subject: Ads: Jeffrey Glick; Buck Mtn. Land, LLC Martha, Attached are two legal notices to be published on November 4 and November 11, 2003. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Diane S. Childers Clerk to the Board County of Roanoke Phone: (540) 772-2003 Fax: (540) 772-2193 Diane Childers - 11-18-Community Development.doc Page 1 LEGAL NOTICE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, November 18, 2003, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Jeffrey Glick to rezone .81 acres from R-1 Low Density Residential District to C-1 Office District in order to operate a general office located at 2415 Electric Road, Windsor Hills Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Community Development, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: October 31, 2003 Diane S. Childers, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times: Tuesday, November 4, 2003 Tuesday, November 11, 2003 Direct the bill for publication to: State Farm Insurance Companies Attn: Jeffrey Glick 2032 Electric Road Roanoke, VA 24018 540/989-6969 SEND ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: Diane S. Childers Clerk to the Board P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 Diane Childers - 11-18-Community Development.doc ,. -- - - - Page 2 - -~ LEGAL NOTICE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, November 18, 2003, in the Board Meeting Room of the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA, on the petition of Buck Mountain Land, LLC to rezone 1.88 acres from I-1 Industrial District to AR Agricultural/Residential District in order to construct single family dwellings located on Eagle Crest Drive, Cave Spring Magisterial District. A copy of this application is available for inspection in the Department of Community Development, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, VA. Dated: October 31, 2003 Diane S. Childers, Clerk Please publish in the Roanoke Times: Tuesday, November 4, 2003 Tuesday, November 11, 2003 Direct the bill for publication to: Buck Mountain Land, LLC Attn: Don Dye P.O. Box 20041 Roanoke, VA 24018 540/776-9052 540/520-3250 cell SEND ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO: Diane S. Childers Clerk to the Board P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 2 PUBLIC NOTICE Please be advised that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, at its meeting on November 18, 2003, at the Roanoke County Administration Center, 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, Virginia, at the session beginning at 7:00 pm will hold a public hearing on the following: ORDINANCE DECLARING A PARCEL OF REAL ESTATE TO BE SURPLUS AND DONATING SAME TO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY, NAMELY PROPERTY LOCATED ON EAST CLEVELAND AVENUE (TAX MAP N0.60.16-9-10) All members of the public interested in this matter set forth above may appear and be heard at the time and place aforesaid. A copy of the full text of the ordinance is on file and is available for public inspection in the office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, whose office is located at 5204 Bernard Drive, Roanoke, Virginia. Paul M. Mahoney Roanoke County Attorney Publish on the following dates: November 4, 2003 November 11, 2003 Send invoice to: Diane Childers Roanoke County Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 Diane whilders -Fwd: Public Notice -Cleveland Ave. -Habitat for Humanity From: Sue Bane To: Diane Childers; Paul Mahoney Date: 10/21 /03 11:35AM Subject: Fwd: Public Notice -Cleveland Ave. -Habitat for Humanity FYI Sue Bane Legal Assistant Roanoke County Attorney's Office sbane@co.roanoke.va.us 772-2007 772-2089 (fax) _. Page 1 --~._ ___ Diane :J~ilders -Public Notice -Cleveland Ave. -Habitat for Humanity From: Sue Bane To: legals@roanoke.com Date: 10/21 /03 11:34AM Subject: Public Notice -Cleveland Ave. -Habitat for Humanity Please publish the attached notice. Thanks, Sue Bane Legal Assistant Roanoke County Attorney's Office sbane@co.roanoke.va.us 772-2007 772-2089 (fax) Page 1 l ~gPlg ? S~~ a _ ~ ~ e ~ °~~ ~Q1~~1t®1®TdV~~L~'~[ ®f ~g~~~I®T~A MICHAEL M. CLINE Department of Emergency Management 10501 Trade Court State Coordinator Richmond, Virginia 23236-3713 (804) 897-6500 JANET L. CLEMENTS (TDD) 674-2417 Deputy Coordinator FAX (804) 897-6506 L. RALPH JONES, JR. Deputy Coordinator July 21, 2003 Mr. Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Roanoke County P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Dear Mr. Hodge: The Virginia Department of Emergency Management (VDEM) is pleased to announce the allocation of the 2003-II, Office of Domestic Preparedness State Homeland Security Grant Program. This grant is designed to allow local governments in Virginia to supplement funding received from the 2003-I Equipment Grant Program. The 2003-II Grant is for first responders to have better preparedness to combat and deal with terrorist acts involving weapons of mass destruction and to mitigate the costs of enhanced security at critical infrastructure facilities during periods of hostilities with Iraq and if enough funding remains, to help with costs in future periods of heightened threat. Your community's preparedness enhancement grant award amount is detailed on the enclosed sheets as attachment 1. This amount was based upon a formula that provided $50,000 plus $2.07 per capita to your locality. This funding must be used according to the requirements specified by the Office of Domestic Preparedness (ODP). Attached (attachment 2) for your use is the guidance provided by ODP. Under the preparedness enhancement portion of this 2003-II Grant award, localities are allowed to spend funds in four (4) areas of need in First Responder Preparedness. They are as follows: 1. Purchase of specialized emergency response equipment and terrorism incident prevention equipment. As in the 2003-I Grant, the number of equipment commodity areas is 12. "Working to Protect People, Property and Our Communities" ,_ .__ Diane Childers -Meeting date for presentation Page 1 From: Elmer Hodge To: Diane Childers; dkjolhede@visitroanokeva.com Date: 10/22/03 2:10PM Subject: Meeting date for presentation Diane, David Kjolhede, Director of the CVB has asked to be placed on the=tUovember 18th agenda for a briefing and presentation at the 3:00 meeting. Please call him to get additional information and materials. Thanks Elmer Hodge Roanoke County Administrator ba, 540-772-2004 ~^ `d. C~ ~ rep-- - a~2-~3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 U[~ p~~ ~~~ ~~. ~OANOKE _~ ~« .. 'VALLEY ® O}~~lYglt~If~ KOAN 0 KE VALLEY CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU . . ~, -. 2002-2003 ANNUAL RE~IIEVV - Introducrion - On behalf of the Board of Direct ors and staff of tl ~e Roanoke Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau, l am pleased to present this ~ -view of Bureau accomplishments for Fti' 2002%2003. In spite of the challenges of a weak economy, particularly at the state level, the bureau has had a productive year, as the data on the follawirig pages indicates. In addition to the numbers displayed on the following pages, it should be pointed out that no organization operates "in a vacuum' and the lsureau is no exception. Partnerships with area Parks and Recreation Departments have led to a strong sports marketing program, while partnerships with member golf and hotel properties have resulted in a growing golf package initiative. The Bureau also works with the Arts e Council of the Blue Ridge and its member organizations in a variety of marketing and legislative initiatives. Additionally, Bureau staff has been involved in branding programs with the City of Roanoke and the Regional Alliance. ~ On a regional, state and national basis, the Roanoke Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau is active in a number of organizations. Bureau staff have active, leadership roles in the Shenandoah Valley Travel Association, Virginia Hospitality and Travel Association, Virginia Society of Association Executives and the Virginia Association of Convention and Visitors Bureaus. The Bureau is also involved in the Greater Washington Society of Association Executives, National Tour Association, Travel Industry Association of America andt=he international ~~.ssociation of Convention and Visitors Bureaus. Collectively and individually, all of the above mentioned partnerships and cogperative efforts provide opportunities to expand the tourism base and the tourism economy in the Roanoke Valley. When integrated ~nnth Bureau programs, a complete mosaic of marketing opportunities is created for the economic benefit of the entire region. avid L. Kjolhe e Executive Director l y ~ F' ' Investment Results ' The Bureau budget for FY 2002/2003 was 51.2 million. The Bureau s stakeholders and partners included the cities of Roanoke and Salem, Roanoke, Franklin and Craig Counties, the Virginia Tourism Corporation and over 175 private sector members from the hospitality industry in the Valley and beyond. Utilizing conversion study results and conservative spending figures, the Bureau's budget generated the following revenues for the Valley and our partners: Leisure Travelers: Conventions Hosted: Sports Marketing: Motorcoach: F Golf: S34,253,000 533,726,000 S 8,622,000 S 1,179,000 . 5 152,000 577,932,000 Total Direct Spending These 577 million dollars are a direct result ofBureau-driven marketing programs,and represent appi^oximately 20~ of the 5369 million spent annually in the Valley by visitors, conventioneers, sports enthusiasts and group travelers. These figures are explained in greater detail throughout this report and utilize conservative figures from Bureau conversion studies-and Visitor Center surveys. 6 Convention Sales _::::::~ ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.... zv~.z~~.:....... :~ :::.:::::..............::::::::::::::.:..:~.:..:.~::.:::.::.::::.::.::.::::.::.:.::::.::.::.::..::::::::::.:::: _:::::.::::::.:.:_: :. z:::::::::::.::::::::::::.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::;:::::::::::::::....:..:.............................::: ~:.~:. .......... ::::::::::::::..............:::::::::::::::..............::::::::::...:........::::::::. :.~ ::...~~c~~.~~~~ .................... ~:.::::::.~::::..................:..::::::::::::::.~:::::::::........... :. :: :. :: .: .::::: ~: .. :::::: Leads Generated ' ~4 _ 80 The RVCVB has continued focusing sales efforts on Valleywide meetings, conventions and events, which use multiple hotels and large meeting venues. This program is~evolving as available dates, changing travel patterns, the economy, transportation costs and availability all continue to influence travel planner decisions. Target markets -Social, Military, Educational, Reunion, Fraternal (SMERF) and Associations are valid and viable options for the Roanoke Valley. Washington DC possesses the largest concentration of meeting planners in our region and one convention sales person was assigned to that market in ` January of 2002. i Convention Leads Generated and Conventions Booked are up over the previous year. Total .Room Nights and Convention Attendees are down,- but this number is somewhat misleading. In 2001/2002, Sports Marketing was included in all Convention Sales categories. In 2002/2003 Sports Marketing is a totally separate category. The results are listed in a following section. Although it would appear to bean anomaly that direct spending is predicted to be up nearly $1 million i over the previous year, with attendees down, it is not, for two reasons. The average spending per person for conventioneers is substantially~higher than sports participants. New research conducted by the International Association of Convention and Visitor Bureaus indicates that in markets the size of the ' Roanoke Valley, convention attendees' spending on a daily basis increased about $30 per day. It should be remembered that this section deals with future business and unforeseen factors may influence the final numbers in either a positive or negative fashion. Overall, however, the trend would appear to be pos;tive in growing the Valley's share of the meeting and convention market. ~ Conventions Hosted * Includes Franklin Graham Crusade ^ F This section refers to conventions and meetings held in the Roanoke Valley in the past fiscal year in which the Bureau was involved. These conventions were the direct result of Bureau marketing efforts or joint marketing efforts with various meeting industry partners. The tremendous increase in Attendees acid Direct Spending can be attributed almost exclusively to the Franklin Graham Crusade. This was a significant piece of business, but not one, which frequently occurs in the Valley. This tends to skew the year-end results to the positive for this year, but will have the opposite effect next year. u Sports Marketing "`Includes Repeat: Commonwealth Games (13,000 att./1,603 TRNs) Virginia High School Wrestling (3, 500 att./650 TRNs) ' With the Bureau's increased emphasis on Sports Marketing, it seems appropriate to establish a category for measuring results. Numbers in Total Room Nights, Attendees and Estimated Direct Spending reflect both groups the Bureau is directly responsible for bringing to the Valley and groups in which the Bureau partnered with members Qf our Sports Marketing Committee in the bid processor in providing support in hosting the event. In both instances, the process of attracting sporting events to the Roanoke Valley is cooperative in nature, involving the Bureau, local Parks and Recreation Departments, civic centers. and the private sector. Building upon former successes - particularlythose in Salem -has made this one of the fastest growing niche markets for the Bureau and the Valley. u -- ~ '~ .. ::: x ~<:: ~:~ ,. '' . ~. I ~> Motorcoach Marketing . ::::: . : : . : : : : . : : . : : . : ::::::. :: ::.:. : : . : : : :: . :.:::. Leads Generated 187 1:89 The Bureau aggressively markets to group travel planners, group leaders and the motorcoach industry both nationally and internationally. Direct mail, familiarization tours, trade shows and one-to-one sales efforts have proven to be effective methods of reaching our targeted audience. i Generated Leads have remained relatively stable, but Total Room Nights, Overnight Trips, Day Trips and Direct Spending have increased 11 %, 10.5%, 73% and 11 %, respectively. For the second consecutive year, direct spending has exceeded $1 million. The Bureau's involvement with international tours, although conducted on a small scale, continues to pay dividends. Witii,several upcoming "world-class" events scheduled for Virginia in the next 3-5 years, this market demonstrates continued growth potential. This market continues. to be a positive for the Valley and should continue. to be viable in the next few years. However, numerous factors, most significantly population demographics, can potentially impact this market segment and force changes in a relatively short time. II II II n .. ~ rism Statistics Tau Golf Package Program ..: ~a~~::.::.:.:::::.:}:.:~::: :::::t::::_:::::t:.::.:;.::::.:::}:t.}}}:;::;:::;::::::::ii:::t::::.::.}::.}::.};.}}}:::.:::.:::i:;:::ii:::::::;::i:;::;.:i..}}}:t.:::.::t.}}:.}:t.::.::.::i::::::::ii:;::_:::::~:.}:::.::.::.:.::.::.:. ,:. :}:.}:.}:t.:;.:t.:_:.}:.}:.}:.;:.:{t.}::.}}}}:}}:.}: ~-~~2:....... ::~:::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::: a:; :;::::::;:::::t}}:.}:.}:::.}:a.}:.}}}:.::at~}:.: Marketing Budget _ $55,©QD $55,40+0 ~> . ~it...~?E~.......~..:: #~ ::..:................................:.................. ......................: ..................... :..::.. Rounds of Golf Played'- 1,894 :..t.:..}: rn}}::. n::::.. ~. ;{....:v.: ~.:::• •. b:«. :.;.:... :"i;\..} :N,.:::: •::::::..; ..{..; ...:::: • .......... .... v..~ .z•• ...... .. .. J.... u.v; nAv :.... ..:....{.:...:,.,~ .:,.{C ........ .. ..... .: .... ... {:iv:ii ,.ti:.....:nn. ....::::. .~ : ...... .... :...... ... n y v.-. :::{.: ••:.:}:•:::..}: tom: t!.}•f.}-.vii::}i iii}:-iY}{:i:~ }...... ~~cvy~~]j~}~~( .. . . . . .. v. _ :: ...........: ....... .................. ......:.:: ext. n• .. ~ - ii .f.i.~ /... :~~.:~~V3.i ~i~T~•w:r}:•::.}:•:::::~v}}:r•.}Y^}:i•. ~:n'•}n ........::: ... ?~. .~.i ~...~...........~ .........................:::..........w:.... n..:::::......:.:.:.....:..::i:::}}isi...:::}}} ... .. f: }:::.v::::•Y.•}:::~ n: 4: iiiv::i:::i:vi......., ::.. . ... }}}:•}):{.}?}:vii•}i}:. .. . '~~?] .......... ~.' :t•~:Fi;':;f~:.';{J',:rt;:i}::-t-jY::jy: ;':: .......... .::: ... .. }?i}}}}?i..:.:n}}}}}}i........:}.~::}:}}}i}}}::}:4}i::i}i:}i}i: ti}}}}}}}}}}:.ii :<{::'4::::::::::i'~:2;:;:;:;:;:i::i::::r:ir::i~<::::;::"::;v::::.;;:;:'i::;:::;:~:::i:::;':i';:;:is~i':,,'.:::::};:±`:-~t::~::':%'?~::u':::':=::::::i::;:;.;:;.>. .::::::: :i ::::::::::::::::::::::i::%:i'~::::::::::.`-::ii:$::::::::::`:':;.:+;:i> ~:::::: ::: Room Nights 8©7 .::: }v:;i is yr:. }ii .._.:. :•::. w~-~-. YOTAL REVENUE ~ $110,'135 2,751 993 ;. $152,556 The Golf Package Program, started nearly 5 years ago in cooperation with member golf courses and hotels, has demonstrated a strong upward growth curve. Although the Marketing Budget has remained flat, increases have occurred in every category with Total Revenue Generated up over 38%. It should be noted that when this program started, the Bureau supplied the majority of the marketing dollars, with the understanding that as the program grew, participating hotels and golf courses would increase their financial participation. This has been exactly the case, as demonstrated in the Private Funds category. The Golf Package Program will continue to grow. The potential exists for additional golf courses and hotels to become involved in the program -increasing both the product and marketing resources available. - Advertising & Editorial $290,154 *~ Includes $70,250 private co-op dollars '"~ Includes $65, 292 private co-op dollars This section reflects the amount of dollars allocated to purchase advertising and the dollar value of free advertising and editorial the Bureau staff was able to leverage through efforts with travel writers and the travel trade. The Ad Placement Budget is comprised of dollars provided by our public and private sector members leveraged against matching grants from the Virginia Tourism Corporation, initially totaling $150,000. However, the State's declining revenue situation resulted in a mid-year cut in the matching funds program, which in turn, deprived the Bureau of over $67,000 in matching funds. This directly impacted the Ad Placement Budget for FY 2002/2003. With advertising dollars declining, the ability to leverage free editorial also was reduced. However, the biggest loss in this category was the result of a 4-page spread in Southern Living in FY 2001 /2002 valued at over $440,000, which the magazine chose to not repeat in FY 2002/2003. With the State still struggling with their revenue stream, it would appear that there will be Flo matching funds programs for advertising in the foreseeable future. This makes it ever more critical that the Bureau develop other revenue streams and find ways to increase existing streams if we are going to maintain our current marketing programs. t a Visit the Roanoke Valley of Virginia - Inguiries_from Publications .................. : ~o. . - ~Qa~ .. Leisure _ _ 127,629 ttt• ....................................... ........... ........... :.::~ :.:i:::i :::;:; ::i::i; .ti i::::i::i::. :;}:i;:i:: :4\L-: }i:::.~ ::::::::::::::}}::}}:i :4:.:,4}is:-:::::::.~::::::::}i}}:::::.:: ~.:::.}}v:{•}}:::::. ~:::..::..::. :: ii iii is i:i?iiiiii}ii :x; .......:: .:::::::.:~ . :....... .::: nom:: .... ...... ........: :_ii}}::::': ::: • : s~ii~i::.}w.::::::.:.......:::.:::::::: n:~:.:~::::::}}i}::. ~::...._-:. . . .v :• :} ii: : i}'ii _. .. _ iiii::: i:~i iiiii:fiv ~:i iijiiii:::. __ r •. Tour Operators /Travel .i:. ___ -` _. .. Jiiiii::::::i {}iiiii "'~. 52 Agents : ~ ~ = ::i:::}_:{:ii:<::: :::isM.?::ii::}::}~:i:>•v::::~::ii ;:«<:i:::>: -}:. :::. :~~c}~-~.}":~. ;.::::. ...:: ~. ~3.~-~:.%:::i:}:::i::i:;:`;:i>::i::i::::::::`c}:}`:::'::::::ii::i:::'f-is:::;::::::i~::::::r::::::::i: ::.::>::::::.:{:::::::;:i::>:::>:::::::<::i::i::::i}:::: ;::<::~:>:::i:::»: :>_:;: : - -..:::::~:~7t .::::::::::::::::::::::::::i::~ :::':':,': c:: :i i:~ii::i::i :......... ..................... :..:. ~::::: ,::.:::::::::::.: TOTAL'1NQUIRIES: 133,©59 Includes 11,013 Internet click-throughs/leads 97,.595 28' Pages Requested on Web Site ~. :r::}i~::::::::~ ::.:.................................. :: ~:::::=::::~:::::r:::::::_:::: :::::}.::::~:.:::::::?::}-::~~::i::: =:::::i::}=::iii::::::iii:::_i::::}::i.x:.}:}:.:..}.::,.}:.:i>>::~.}:?:.}:.}:..} . , ... ...v ...:...... .. .. ... : ......•.. •:nh•:. 4-}%?{: n:4}}}}:_}}}}}:4:{{r.• ...:. ... :: ~i: ~~$: rv:ii'~'i?..:i'v$i ... nh. .. \......... ..,.. : ,... x. ...:........, v. v ... v .......\... h\.... n .............. : ..... . .. .v........ .......:..,.....: .,:.... .:.....:::.. .:. .- x ... ... .,.. v .. v.vv. \ .. \\.. . v.} \ v...... \...... ... ... 4. ...{ n .v,..: ...kv............vw .......... ..... x .....:..: My x:: ..:::::.v. F............... v.. : \4ff 'v:\$i'filTYv',: %C:'.iti:.vi: ~::;':;:;., ~.. .}.,4-::: •:.'a.:}-'kv. .,?: .,-. .... 4}..fir ~q..~S~• f.. .,-:f-:.,,•: 4: t::.:_.-: •: •:xxn:..-: {•:.fr-.::-:: :•.5c•.., :•:}:::.,;.:::::::. ,c:::::-::.~:::::. •:::-:f: ,.fr ..: :.,•::::::}:::. -% {..,. . { "ice v8 4.v,.. ~..v .::.{~}:}. •? .. 4........n:M...... ... {-: •.-: v.~ 4.v:\}}:-}}:{}•\vr n.. ?:. ~iiv{ti•?':rte'-':J:-}%4..4:. f .............. {; ...v..:.4.. \x'v..\ Z v ..v..\......v.v ......v.n .. ... .. ....x . ?}:::.::::::::fv: •.~......... .v ti{..~ .. •~,v.:xx:: n:vv::::::::::::. $''v.{e ...\. ..~4v }}~i\.\.... .. ..v ..... .... ... ..... ..n.. .. ..... .........:.~:x.~::::::v:~.v...-:::::::::.~:n..... x:: n4 .... :...w:::::..:::::... v...:::::: :vim::: /.vim: v.~. :G 4 ..r..: •:: v.•.......x.vv ....: ... ......... :.vv::::wn:...........1::..4 .v.... v ........v.... nn•nx.~.wn.......... , lvn .. ,.....n..v .......... ....:v ..... ,.:.: ........... ...... ..........vv..x::::::................ n. w,rv ;w:.........•- v...::.v::::: r:..vv...r•• :•: •:: x::::: ;•::::::: .. ... ........ vv v......... - .......v...v................... .....:.....:...... ~-. ............. \v ...v .....\. ..........v... n....... r:: }: }::::::::v::::: -.. xvv ..h.... ..~:.......... .. ... : ...... . .......4............. .......... r.............. . ...................................... ............ . .............rw:frv: {v:..n.::: n...........:... . ........... .... . ..v........ -....v..... ............. . v.......v.........v................ ....v. r.:::.........:.: :.... ..,..... n. :Cti-}.}:J'.:.. i}.;Ln}}}.. }isi}}:-.....? .......................C...........v.............._..:....:....................... Y.... n...:..vv....:..vv...........:::..... Number of client Sessions 145,165 210,4'1 I . The leisure requests of $97,595, phone and e-mail of 4,698 and the client sessions of 210,401 t represent over $34 million in direct spending. Conversion studies conducted by the Bureau indicate that 24% of people requesting information or registering on client sessions visit the Valley within 6 months. Another 57% indicate they will visit within the year, but they are not included in this formula. 312,694 requests X .24 = 75,046 X 2.7 ppl/party = 202624 X 2.45 days (avg. length of stay) _ 496,428 X $69 per person/day = $34,253,587 direct spending ~~~~ ! -_ 1 L Search for: j The Roanoke 4 Valley of VA .................. .................. ................. . .................. ::::.............. ........... <::r" r Top 10 Inquiry/ ~Generati~ng Publications Good Housekeeping Modern Maturity Better Homes & Gardens . Virginia Travel Guide Blue Ridge Travel Association Parade Blue Ridge Parkway Association _ Ladies Home Journal Southeast Tourism ~~ Valassis Top 10 States.lnquiring (via phone, a-mail and mail) Virginia Pennsylvania North Carolina New York . Florida New Jersey . -- Maryland Ohio Texas Georgia t - Conclusion - Conventioneers, tour groups, sports participants and leisure travelers all contribute to the economic well-being of the Roanoke Valley. The Virginia Tourism Corporation's (VTC) most recent figures indicate that tourists spend over S369 million peryear in the Valley, making tourism a St million per day industry. ' Certainly, outside forces such as economic uncertainty, homeland security and the 'shake-out' in the travel industry will continue to impact tourism nationwide. However, the Roanoke Valley is well positioned as are affordable, driveable, enticing destination for many groups and travelers. The Bureau has done a good job of identifying these market segments and utilizing the dollars invested by our public and private partners to promote our area to them. Although the marketplace grows increasingly competitive and funding is a growing challenge, the Bureau will continue to develop innovative, cost effective programs to remain viable in the marketplace. The Valley possesses a great product mix and when this is combined with effective marketing, the tourism industry will continue to expand. ~. i COUNTY OF ROANOKE SIX-YEAR SECONDARY SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION PLAN FOR FISCAL YEARS 2004-2010 and REVENUE SHARING FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005 VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (SALEM DISTRICT) A TABLE OF CONTENTS AGENDA PAGES 1. SIX YEAR SECONDARY CONSTRUCTION PLAN FOR FY 04-10 a. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................1 b. COUNTYWIDE INCIDENTAL CONSTRUCTION ITEMS ....................1 - RURAL ADDITION UPDATE ...............................................2 - RURAL ADDITION PRIORITY LIST ......................................3 c. NUMBERED PROJECTS ............................................................4 1. PROJECTS TO RECEIVE FUNDING IN FY 04/05 ...............5-31 2. PROJECTS ADDED/REVISED ..........................................32 3. PROJECTS CONSIDERED/NOT ADDED ............................32 d. VDOT'S SIX-YEAR ROAD PLAN AS SUBMITTED FY 04/05 ........33-40 2. REVENUE SHARING FOR FY 04-05 a. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................41 b. REVENUE SHARING PRIORITY LIST AND MAPS .....................42-79 c. VDOT'S REVENUE SHARING FORM .......................................80-88 d. PROJECTS CONSIDERED BUT NOT FUNDED .............................89 • • RURAL ADDITION UPDATE The following is a review of each road that staff has completed or is currently working on: REMOVED FROM LIST: ARTRIP LANE: Project has been completed; VDOT has accepted and project will be scheduled for construction. CURRENTLY UNDERWAY: INDIAN HILL ROAD: Requires staff to obtain right-of-way and drainage easements. Speculative Interest also exists on this project. Staff is currently working on construction plans for submittal to VDOT. Staff received one addition to this year's RURAL ADDITION PRIORITY list (FRANCE DRIVE). Several packets of information were sent out; however, this was the only completed petition received. M W I~ C f,~al Qdd ~ '~ 153, ~ - h.a,~ Isilg ha,ue ~ ~ro Jcc~S ~n aY1 l t s}-? w had ~4 -5 I ~+- t ~ as ~ o~ z I~t- re ~~ ~ er fc~'d . u~ ~h~~n c. ~}- ~n n a~ MUV~ - t5 16~ccmlc ~~` scrcx ~{- ~ or 5h~ld UJe ~tC~t~~ In 56f~1e f~x.M1r-r? ~'C ' S ~- 5 ~ ~~ ~'° I t~ Gft-~Cf to -t C:t. ~c`~-~l ~. Cc~ ld prcx~c ~~~G • 2 1.c NUMBERED PROJECTS: The bulk of Roanoke Count 's allocated funds are for Numbered Pro'ects. This Y J year, staff anticipates approximately $2.74 million to be allocated toward numbered projects. The entire six-year plan as submitted as submitted by VDOT is enclosed for your review (see pages 33-40). The following is a summary of our current and proposed plan for next year: 1.c.1. PROJECTS SCHEDULED TO RECEIVE FUNDING IN FY 04/05: THE FOLLOWING ROADS ARE CURRENTLY IN THE SIX-YEAR PLAN AND ARE SCHEDULED TO RECEIVE FUNDING THIS FISCAL YEAR: Priorities #0-12, 17 are scheduled to receive funding this year and are highlighted over the next several pages. Priorities # 13, 14, 15, 16, and 18 will not receive any funding this year. Unpaved roads are a separate account and the allocation is based upon the number of qualifying lane miles within each County. Only 2.11 miles of our unpaved roads (21.32 total miles) qualify for funding because they meet the minimum 50 vehicles per day requirement. 4 • • ROANOKE COUNTY SECONDARY SYSTEM SIX YEAR ROAD PLAN -~ r-r O ~ o p ~ t O a ~ ro ~ m t'r U -/J o~0 ~,J ~ POft9(Spn ~/'~ ..l ~ Ar ----~ ~ ~ ~~ cS ,~,~ era ~~ F~ ~~oke oy~ KING BROTHERS READ PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 6 ~~ ~~ • • s ROANOKE COUNTY ~~~ ~;~`:~~"~~ SECONDARY SYSTEM ~ ~~ SIX YEAR ROAD PLAN ~' ~ /9r /:, a~ ~ v. ~ 'h ~` r~, j/~ }_ ^\' t y / ~'`~. `ma'y 4r /1`~/ R~ / ~ sod }2 J ~ > ,~ F:: ~/ 1 f~ R~ ~8C ~ ~ ti % ~ /~ ~\\ / 1 ~~~' I .~ ~ ~~ j Rc,621 :_'~ 0 ~ h~ \~ y -~ / ill ! p ~'. ~/ Qtr a- f/ '~~W. `--- I byb .. ~.~~. i. / ---J__~__jj~r `H / a' , '~~ i ~. ~F ` „r,., U `~.Rt. , ~ ~b°~ HOLLINS ROAD -~~3.. 1 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 8 ~J • • PRIORITY #3 OLD CAVE SPRING ROAD (SR 1663) MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: ~t(1d66T ~1~~~j TRAFFIC COUNT: 7,000 vpd PREVIOUS FUNDING: $1,125,000 ADDITIONAL FUNDING: $1,195,000 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST: $2,320,000 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: STRAIGHTEN ALIGNMENT, WIDEN, AND IMPROVE DRAINAGE. STATUS: IN CONJUNCTION WITH PRIORITY #2, MCVITTY ROAD, FINAL PLANS ARE NEARING COMPLETION. STAFF CONTINUES TO WORK WITH VDOT TO ENSURE THAT THE PROJECT WILL BE COMPATIBLE WITH DESIGN CRITERIA BEING APPLIED TO THE COLONIAL AVENUE PROJECT. THE COLONIAL ALLIANCE HAS SEEN THE PROPOSED PLANS AND ARE GENERALLY AGREEABLE TO THOSE DESIGN GUIDELINES. COUNTY BOS APPROVED THE USE OF PAVED SHOULDERS TO ACCOMMODATE BICYCLISTS ON OLD CAVE SPRING ROAD. THE COUNTY WILL NOT INCUR ANY ADDITIONAL COSTS CONSEQUENT TO THE ADDITION OF THE PAVED SHOULDERS. ADDED TO SIX-YEAR PLAN: PRIOR TO 1994 ESTIMATED ADVERTISING DATE: APRIL 2007 PROPOSED FUNDING: FY04/05: 120 000 FY06/07: 305 000 FY08/09: 75 000 FY05/06: 600 000 FY07/08: 95 000 FY09/10: 0.00 10 r-~ • ~~ ~J ROANOKE COUNTY SECQNDARY SYSTEM SIX YEAR ROAD PLAN ---,.._._____._...-_._.a ~ : _.. -t~ ~ ~ r: Rt gam.--.._...1 ~`` 1 .,` \, Rt, 702 ,..s_ _.___-- .~ ~i ~ ~ ~~ `,~ ~~t-, ~ R £;1638 ~ .; ~::~ '~...3g ~ .gyp Q j _ ~ ~.r. ~.~ ~. ~'~ ___..r-- ~,/ ~tU~ 22l b~f _ 1 ~~.~ _. E f _- ~_~. ,,. ~~: <~ ~~ /, I~ICVITTY RQAD, LLD CAVE SPRING READ PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 11 • • ROANOI~E COUNTY SECONDARY SYSTEM SIX YEAR ROAD PLAN ,~ %; ~~ i j ~ ~'~.. N `,~ o r ~ \ ~`°', ,~~ ~: f J t~ ,\ ~ 1 9~;. , ~ \ \ R ~~~p ~\ `~, ~\,.,; Rt,~1633 ~ ~~ ~ i l .. Rt• 7y.: i' ~ ~ \ ~' `;~ 1 ~ ~ :;;, ~~N~ ,:~.~~~ / Q-"' \~ll 1 ~~~ fix. ~~t~ ~~ ~. ~ \I~JS \~r C(JL©NIAL AVENUE • PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 13 • i• • ROANOKE COUNTY SECONDARY SYSTER4 SIX YEAR ROAD PLAN ~~ ~~ y~~~~ ~ '. ~ 9 b,_....... ^. ~ ~- pe~~ Rd ~ ;x~ o, rn Q~~t- Rd Rt ~e e Ridge Q"`~ .~4~~ ~.~ ~~ o ~~J~ ~ ~==-~ d - tD ~_ ~' ~/ ~_'~ ' . Y J~~ '% Rd __. Rt ...679 ~ % ~ ~~ / ~~ ~~ G~' ¢`~~ ~ ~a 91e vr~st Dr i~~y ~~d9e ~C P ~a at~7 a 'QOd ~~ d~ ~~ 5 c~~C O- ~~ T4 /~ ~. ~ ~ P ., ~ ~. BUCK MOUNTAIN ROAD I PROPOSED IP,4PROVEMENTS 15 • i• r~ ~.J ROANOKE COUNTY `~=1 SECONDARY SYSTEM `~ SIX YEAR ROAD PLAN ~~ 1 r` r, Rt. ,\'~ ~'~. JAI R~ ~'~..~~ ~ ~I; 1 ~~qS, i i' ~~ ~- - "-. ,''r'te `L---`_`_-~---._ ^RIGIFJAL SC^PE _ ~ 'P~ ^F WORK J~;_...'" 4.8 /'J 8 pX\` ^. ~~~, 9 Q tom..'-.--~~- g~ ~`-`-~... ~~J ~~ye R~~; ~ h Y ~'.,,, s._. Pa r k wa y ~1`~ ~%F ~r'l w ~''~ ``' ADDITIONAL { WORK ~~ r /% t1 t 4 1 ~``., ~~'z~ 1 \~~~~r~ COTTON HILL ROAD ~~ PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 17 • t • ROANOKE COUNTY SECONDARY SYSTEM SIX YEAR ROAD PLAN .~ ,~~ ~ % ~ ~_~ / ~ ~~ ~.. ~ t h -~...,. ~w ~ „ :~J ~D~j\ ~~ ' r ~\~ .~ I ~, ~~ ~- ;~~~ Rt. 651 ~ 4 ~ roa::,,e ... ,` ":., 1 'T e~ ~ ~`~ ~J1 ~`~ ~ `. ~\ 1 ~ ~1r~ I ~ ~~ ~` Fi ~l ~~% ` ~ ~ ~~ e. ni IU kt 1008 ,_ ~ ., ' Jam. a, $;~ ' ~~, f ~ ~ ~ .N.-- 1, ~ ~~ r ~`~~ :~ ~, ,~f l .~ ~~ ~; Ni~UNTAIN VIEW READ PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 19 • 1`~1 u • ROANOKE COUNTY SECONDARY SYSTEM SIX YEAR ROAD PLAN r ,~ ~'.. t.::,.,E,,.~,~ ~ ''~/~ ~x ~ > ~`` 61s~ .ry/;\f l ;! I ~ . ~~=-~ J y i ji `~ ~ Rt. 615~'`~~ i;~ 1 z ~ , ~__ ~~ ~ '~..._... ~7 1 ~ `, ~,..:. ~~..,f> -.~:__ l ~\ /b~ I iq- ~ /~ >>~s ~, ~~v `~~ <} l ,j s1 l // 1 BOOlVES CHAPEL %' ROAD ~; %~ PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 21 i• • • ROANOKE COUNTY SECONDARY SYSTEM SIX YEAR ROAD PLAN I /.' `<~ - ~ 32 , .. ~.,,-~.____ ~~~ /" ; i . , / <, .~'~ ~ L. ~ \ ~'~;~ "/ s' ,,/fit. ~'n ~9 6> \ ~,,~.~-~ ...` t, ~. ``~_ CATAWBA CREEK ROAD PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 23 • • ROANOKE COUNTY SECONDARY SYSTEM SIX YEAR ROAD PLAN ~~ 1~ ,: J ~ _ .:, /o 1 £ /a l , ~ /.~ -J~ \, _:1 \~ ~~ ~~~ ~ 59 ~\ -_, f Rr =~. 63'9 ` ~-.. Y ,,., ~-' ~ ~` ~ i~ 11 ' if / I /; ~ ~` ~ I ~1 ,l :t , , ~ ,: ,% ~ '' , / ! %y b ~/~ ,_ a '~~ j ~ l ..i~ {)~ 1 x ` ,~\ ~ ', \~ 1,-`~. ~~` , `, DRY HOLLO~Y ROAD ~ PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 25 i• i• f, ~; 1 "'~' ftOANOKE COUNTY ~`/~ ~ ~~ ;,~,~`- SECONDARY SYSTEM r R-~.Yl~' r.,:~ µ ` ~ ~~ SIX FEAR ROAD PLAN .1~ 1 R~. r' ~ Rt, ~ soo ____-~ ~ Iss7 I ~ + ~~ ~~ F~ ~ I Y ~ jli{~ i Y 5 (vf~1} '~i Rt. 1759 'P fi "~ ~~ 'f, r ~,` , L ~~ ~,,~ ~~ti ~~~_ ,._ g,'~~~ Uj°~ Rt.l ~~ ~~ ~ J , ~,r Rt,t~56; ~~' 1771 ~,~. ,;~~ r -~:; 'P2~ '~S 6~ ~3^- ~, C4. Rt. 897 ~ ~'~ ~-~: ,.~ ~~ ., ''/ w ~~ i - / ~.l' ~~~ PROPOSED IMPROVEP~IEhJTS ~: x. .~~ !r , '~'~"~ MERRIMAN READ 27 • • RDANDKE COUNTY SECONDARY SYSTEM SIX YEAR ROAD PLAN Ca O {~ji ~ ~ N ~ W Q Rt 7 ~7~ ~ .~+ Cn r+ i-+- rt Q r+' Rt 1855 Vista Av ~ O Kershber9er ~~~g~00x ~ HpU~O-~ 0l~ ~ ~pC' MONT~'~~., ,~~` AVE ~ ~'~~ OAKLgwN ~a ~~ (~ ~1D ~ ~ 0 i ,~ c~ --s i '~;. ~ ~,~ .~ ~~ \~\~5 ~\~ . /~ ~~~ Ci tY~ 0 a MAFt ~~ ~,N ! ~ I ~' '%' JOHN RICHARDSON R{~AD PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS • 29 • • ROANOKE COUNTY SECONDARY SYSTEM SIX YEAR ROAD PLAN ~ ._. ~~ ~~ Naia~ ~_. _ W~_. 1 6^ ~~? ~t'p~~ f i ~ ,--~ Rd ~o~~ 'J- ~~aA i b ~! fOJJJ 0 / '(~\ ~ // X64; \ C ~ \\ ¢, ~..o \ ~~ PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ROCKY ROAD 31 1.d VDOT'S SIX-YEAR ROAD PLAN AS SUBMITTED FY 04/05: Seeondsty System Ceunfiy: Roenake Constructlan Pr©gram Estimated Allacativns • Inc~3entat Regular Urfpavett ` Flsc81 Year Constructlan Cnrrstru~tion Coctatructicsr: ota! 1 2004-43 ~.. _...._ . - - -s~34>44~ ._... ..,.._.. ~2 6sa,74~ _ _..._.. s74,boo - 53,~8,7A5 _... 24345-06 5230>000 52,798>187 ~8fl,000 53,10$,1$7 2006.47 5234,000 52,676.$84 5180,000 53,4$8,850 240?-08 5310,i~00 52,686,311 5156.,838 53,132.949 2408-49 5294,782 52.$39.878 5110,004 $3.194.640 20{99-10 5254,Ot10 52.674,£40 51~0,(>Ot? 53,194,$40 Totals - ..~. S1>6aa,752 ..:.516,544;621 - 5738,838 518,766,021 Sc~ard Apprr~v2l t7ate:: J. A. EChodS .......~. ,......._ ~ „~ VDC}T Reaitient >:ngineet' Data Chelrrnen. Clerk, Co_ Adrnistradssr Cate i Pace? 1 0! 8 33 • • • M °o O N O a Z 0 U ~ ~ o ~~• ~ N N ~ r Z ~ ~ V 'C ~ w "' 4 N Q Z W ..d. Y p E ° .4 a ~ N ~ o 4a ~j' L, G ~ O E m ~ U m o O a 2 O C~ i ~ Ci ~ Q z ~ ~ w Z i W W ~ W p ~_ W 0 O U U W O F- U LL ~ ws # C g Q 3 ~ ~ ~ h Z ° M w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W n ~ ~ ~ ~ h = p~ w m " C a W r C o ~+ z O - Z o 3 LL ~p O W o g g K y~ $ W gj y 4 o K y W o to V U K n m p h ~C K~ m ~3 ~1 LL K e~ y0 v U 6 N p N N N N p (~ R '~ U c0 O N N O O O. N N N N N M O N N N M N N N O N N N M ( ~f ~ 9i pp p N N M ~ pp M N n ^ N N N M p M H N N H N H M pp pp N N N N N M O S pO S ~ yy 0 ~ ~ ~ p O N M N M O F lQ z ~ p M M$ 8 N M N O p N N N N p M M N N p M N 00 O p O~ O J ^4 g o fpp app m O a M Q o O N M M H M M } Qn N M S 8 N N O m O N N W b M M N O M M O 8 N M O 8 O LL { fp 8 PO'/ N p ~f N N N N O m N N ~ j N o Y/ N qH » m ~ N O W U N o ~ ~ g ~ g g ~» $ ~ «~ $ g N«~ ~ d ~ 8 N tp 7 IV N ~'! ~ A N R M N N N ~ pf N ~~ M N N h pp H H 8 pq S p .R M S O p N N S $ G p H N S S p p N N 8 O C N O N p 8 }f 8 N P'1 N !? ~ w O p N ~ N N n N N M N p O N O A O O O O O _ pp~1 mm C m C G ~ n M N r r v ~ C Q _ N N q N Q lL ~ ~ v 5~ QQ " '~ 25 S QQ gg gg ZS o d d QQ Q QQ S" 25 S QQ yQ~ ~ g S E Q QQ Q 2S N S 2S Q Q 8 25 " 2S ~ ~i ~s$~{.( y gD w uO1i ~ Y~ 9i °nm Pv ~ a g °OD o~ g ~i ° ~ $ A^° ~ y 'O N N M yY N M M N N N H M N N N ~ N a ~zv~ a~c°>~ ~'~~~ arc~~ ~'rc~ ~ ~'a~~ ~ ~ 8 ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ o 0 8 ~ o ~ 8 ~ 8 ~ O m A 8 !1 m ~ M ~ ~ N S yd ~ O ~ M M {O~ ~ ~ M N N 1aOp~ p ~pOp O M H O N N y $ p N N N ~ y N O N N O O p N N A p O W ¢ a a ~ g ~ w 3 ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ B ~ w ~ ° p ~ 22 ~ a C U ~ w 3 0 ~ ~ V [3 ti n a K f- ~ 4 ~- w 4 U V~ 3 t. 3 a~ U ~- 3 w z m o ~ o $ ~ g,;wY O ~ ~ g ~WW ' Z W o m gU is ~ Y W g~~w r C9 '" S ? ~i 5 ~U o y N m i! 'o "~ ~ U G ~ ~ 3S = U 1- O y~ m< ~ ~ 0.' ~ O r > K N p U ~' Z ~ C ' O K ,`~{i ~j a dl ~j W _ p ~~ C ~i O Y yF d$ J ~ N S Q N _ ~ d o L¢ ' Ol }E C m O m _ ~ ~ 3 O J J m J W g p~ y U n ~ W of J Y p$ ~ Z ~ R 1~ F- ~ U> N 7 7 m t0 O O Y Y ~ 1~ - N O m_ 4 q4 ~ U ~ ~ T2 O ~ ~ q~+ d d LL {- J F F U U o 2 o Z m a 2 m F~ m ~ ~ ¢ K o m ~ m f~ p~ K¢ o ' , e °' m ~ t y ~ Q u p v ~ (n ~ LL _a k Om C ~ ~ 8~ LL W D U E a ~ O k N e Op m~ W _p ' O Cl Q ~ O m X W~" LL ~ ~ h ~q W m t N N h W ~p ~ b Q N m m m ,y{ W WW ~ ~" O LL LL' 2 Q t r 1- H a K ~ Uhf N U V 1 C ~t R}' O V N~ d O C Q jj K~ N~ a c Q cqq N ~ d £ ~ ~ b Q U C~ V K 5 0 (~ h 4 C O U h K 4 35 • • • Z 2 O ~ W ~ ° _ ~ = Z W Z ~ ~ Z r Q U LL O O ~ O W M o z 5 ~' .,, v 5 ~ v ~ o ~ ~ y w ~° ~ ~ W o ~ ~ ~ ~ O < O L~ i! C ~ 4 m K ~ m YC a_ •~- $~ O g u O ~ ~ 2 ~ O ~ j fQ li ~ m ° 4' C g ~- m m Gj ~ K ~ m ~ ~ . Vj LL Z m r0 0 8 n ~ p N N N p N b ,; m O ~o '~ U O pp p N M N N pp N M M M po M N N ~ pp N H N N p pQ N N 8 8 N N m ~ N ~ q N N ya N W o N N H N o N N N M N M WN O_ Q p p N N 8 S p p N N 8 S G N N O O GO l0 O N N Mf yMN~ h N N Yi q M M fOp ~p p N N Z 0 N O ~ p p p N N N M p N M N M p p pp N N S 8 pp pp pp p N N S S G p pp pp N S S 8 pp pp p N M O S Q J O M M ~ A~ M N ~ n M N ~ +~ ~ N N pop tl [L ~ N Q Z ~ VVV 1~ N y W a S N P ~ M N 8 8 N N 8 O N~ N O M N O p . O LL 8 o ~ N N m ~ '~ {p y N N N N { ~ N N U ° J , ~ ~ U ~ ~x j '~. ~ N O ~O G H~ '~ 8 p N a~ $ p p N M p q p M M$ g p N$ N $ p N N g Z !0 ? a in g r h o ~ M M N w ~ u ~ a N °Nw M ~ ,°~_ N 0 0 N N O 9 t U ~~~ F... ~p y ~ ~ p p 8 N M 8 p p N N 8 ~ o p p M H 8 8 N M S O p p 8 N N S p p p N N Op O O N y O 1 p tl ^ N h N •~ Yp M M N N N N ~ ~j H N M N N } N O Z ~ ~ ~ Qs V ~ e N 8 O pO O ~ po S W N O ~ C ~ M N Q t L C ~ p8 p 8p 8 N N 8 pp 88 SS N N N O 8 8 O 0 4 D ~ ~ O O O 8 N N 8 S H O O N N N N' N N {. ~j p~ppp p ~ M N tV N (Y~~ yp N N fV p p Y • p p N O T N O . N N N N N ' a a ~ ~ ~ ~ a Pi ~ a z ~ ~ ~ b `~~~~ ~ ~ ~'~~~ w 3 0 az~ti m pp ~M$~$M~[[~ N N N M ~~ pMp A M M M O~ N ~ N~ ~ N N N M N N N ^ M M Q M N O u'3 ~ a ~~$ a n~~~ ~ ~'~~~ ~ n~~~ ~ ~~~ ~ Z ` g ~ ° a a c >~ O O K ~ w53 a m O ZO` K K w~ m O K u ° n$ O O K Ts w w 0_ ~g n K O ~m ~ E ~ ~~ ~ ~ °~ - ~ W ~, ~ ~^ F ~ ~ m U^ w ~ 3~ w 3 3~ ~ o v b~ g~ ~2 j Z~ <~ W w 0 Z } Y al < 3~ ~` ~ m ~ ~ O W N S r ~~ O~ `} x 2 C M m o Q K O u W K d LL. F- J r • a O O~ ,$ m$ K e p O ~ < O ~ m$ m (D ~~ ~<<" N ~ ~ ~ o < Q d O QQ' ~Q¢' ~ o m ~ Y o 0 0 p~ ~ > ~ < G o Q Y m O o d o U U U~ o o rv Q ~ r O$ ~ o c ~ N ~ ~ e 25 ~. < ~ q m t O n t~ d ak ~ ~ %n ~ Q m O O O U S Y N o Qq ~~~~ = m N F~ m 5~ Q~Q < a $ < ~ ~ o a 2S ~ $ .~ $ A~ ~~ o ~ Q ~ i ~ n b F 3~ o 1i $Z W~ W~ O S Q 5 Y o W o $ - ~ r ~ O m $ ~ d' 4< r r a ¢ 4 U ~O K~¢ ~ N C 4 £ ~ ~~ N Q a < ~' ~~ vrj ~ a ~ ~~~ N¢ d ii ~ 0~ N C a N a 37 • 0 N W O i a 2 Q O Q:.... ~.. N ro W t Z = ~ 0 0 V 9 w "4 ~. N N a 0 z v w m d q O ~ o ~ c m ~ ~ qa S: Q O U $ ~ 0 n a J C ~ ~(~O YYYYY W H ~ F a. = ~ ~ ~E~ U J U LL ~0.X~ LL W ~ Z U ~ Qo^ ~ d ~ y~ ~~~ ! ((( ~ ~~Q~ p Vqj B ~ M U Z y ~ L° O Q$ C 3 E Qp ~~~ O k JRi LL~' N_ Na ( = N v N a T g ¢ 1=L V x 1 a J~ y~b2 1' ~ 8'' LL K K a ~ ~ ~ g cG _ £ t0 U ao ^ M p aqi ~ .~ w ~ ~ ~ o cos ~ h ~ aqi a4i ~ ~ ~ aQ g g N R p M ~ °n n° M ~ pp pp H N N N pp pp Q M N ~ DD~ OOO pp N N 8 G pp pp pp p M N N N M N O O Iq O ^ ~ M N O N N Z Q N F ~ M M .~ N aY sY H .`Z N N 8 $ .Y N~ NN O O N p Q O N ~ { N N M N M N } n N N N N N N N M .$ N 8 G .9i M 8 S N N N N ~? ~ fQ4~ ~ e M N N N O U O N N O N N N .R H M .Y N p N N 8 S N N S S N N N $ d ~ S N o o' N ~ c o N pO .) M N ~ o rR N N N H S 8 8 Q N N 8 E N N M N x N ~ ITV N N N y ~ N N " ~ ~ ~ ~ W O1~ ~ V ~ ~ N V h N N n C V C / Q' Q {L Q C e N N$ 8 o M N N N $ O~ O O M !1 I ! M M N M N ~ ~ M N N N pp 1( N~ N N „ M N O .~ a ~'~ 8 ~ `a ~~~ ~ ~' ~ ~ a ' ~a ~~ ~'~Pi ~ 8 8 N 'o' 25 5 ~ 85 8 25 `4 ~ 2S S 8 8 8 O O O O S 8 S~ S~ p O O O O .~ m (p ~ °~ 3 d g .Q, $ .ni » o~ g o i N :~S ~ M m vi a~ N 0 0 9i .i w h N a a ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a N gG n Y U n w 2z r U ~~ a O j Z~ U V N F < 2 N ~ ~ ~ K Qp ¢ d F w m w C ~ d$ ~ 6 ~ ~ n ~ N yq d y~ ~NV p ~ ~_ ~ q G ' T X 3 IW- ~ f J ~ y g Y ~ ` ~ a N ~ ~ K W 4 ffi K d LL. ~ J~ ~ $ c N 2~ y ~ ui o o W p h N ~ o K o o °m s ~ S o Q ~ °m N y { g ~ E G o ~i o ~ r a O '~ * n~~ E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ro S ~ Y~ ~ ~ ~ ~ $ H ~ R € m O 3 Q w° w ~ fO^ o d ~ ~ 'c° ~ d ~ F F d ~ ¢ o g y ~ a g g if £ a ~ o y ~ a o ii ~ ~ ` o qg ~ 2 5 ~ p ~ C ~ a c5 a ~ 9 v i ~ a a o v~ y a ~ ? i ai a 39 • ~~ 6-YR SECONDARY SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION PLAN REVENUE SHARING • COUNTY OF ROANOKE REVENUE SHARING PROGRAM FOR FY 2004 - 2005 2.a. INTRODUCTION: The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) annually provides counties the 0 ortun~eceive State matchin funds for the construction, maintenance, and improvement to primary and secondary roads in the State's highway s stem. e COmI11on P th of Virg' i~~~nn fnr t P ma+rhinn r,rnnram and limits localities to $500.000 Pa~h. Howgv~f more or less than 20 counties participa share of money will be reduced/increased pron~rti- c~na_taly Roanoke County and the Virginia Department of Transportation staff have been continuously reviewing and evaluating streets and drainage requests throughout the year. In addition to reviewing citizens' inquiries, staff contacted Roanoke County's Economic Development Department, Utility Department, and VDOT's area superintendents. VDOT and County staff have reviewed and evaluated each request received for inclusion in the revenue sharing plan. In deciding which projects would be included, the following criteria were used; traffic counts, pavement width (18' or greater for plant mix) existing and future development, overall pavement condition (alligator cracking, depressions and utility cuts), drainage, vehicular safety, and the economic benefits. Following is our priority of projects to be completed in the summer of 2006 or beyond. ~~il- of Q%~S ~nonluuc 64r~1- rip u~ .1 re -~ i ~, 41 ROANOKE COUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 04-©5 REVENUE SHARING ,.. ~ v s P~ o ~ Q~ ~ ~ ~ o~ ~ ~~ ~V~ ~ ~ c~~ ~~~~, ~~' ~a ~~ v • • ,~ ~ t ~ ~2~-'' a ~_ ~ /' ~ ~~ ~`~ i ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ¢~ i ~~~ o~ i.. ~~ ~ ~~ N ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `. ~~ ~~~h °' `--r ~r~s R~ _-~ PP,OPGSEO IMPROVEMENTS ~~ ~, , ~~~ u ~~~ ~, `~ ;~ ;" ~~ GREENWOOD FOREST 43 • R4ANOKE COUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 04-05 REVEN[JE SHARING • ~~ tV ~ '0~4 ~t ~ ~ ~ . o t ~Q .~~~ G~S~~~ O 1 ;o ~ r a ~°n an ~'~ ~~ ~,~ ,., e~~w;~h 0~ Rt 18~~ r ~~ .\~, ~s Magnolia Rd Rt ~ 89 6 ,~ Water C~ak____? ~~ PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS -~ 0 0 ~~ -~ f. Mounta EIemE Poll ~. Cold Mgno r ~C `n h'a ~ o ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~~ ~_ PLANTATION CR AREA 45 • • ftOANOKE CUUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 04-05 REVENUE SHARING ~¢ u~ co +' o~ a PQrk ~a ~ ~a ~~ ~p~tvo.te ~~\~e ~t'~ 9 ~ ~ i ~ Q V `~ O _ W ~ A y ~a ~ t a i ~ r~,~ ~~ ~ a r ch ~ -~ 3 v ~ O~ '~4 Q ~ J _~'~ ~,,,~ Rd -z ~~ PROPGSED IMPROVEMENTS POOR MOUNTAIN RD. 47 C • • ROANOKE COUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 04-05 REVENLTE SHARING c 0 w `~~ ~ ~r op 4~ %P aT ~' ~~ Rt. 617 g 60 Rd P''+{zer a k a Rt. 6}7 6j) ~,, .., In WIn~2rn2re Y ~ \ R. <; '' n 0 U PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS PITZER RD. 49 C7 ROANOKE CUUNTY PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS NEWPORT RD. • 51 DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 04-05 REVENUE SHARING • • • ROANOKE COUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 04-05 REVENUE SHARING Q~ , ~ ~~ ~ a ~.-1~ ~ ~ ~ a ~\~~ r -~~r''~w 'r'te ~'~ ,...-- e~ S X R~ ~"a p~rks~de Rd__. ~ O ~O~ `~ oL ~~ ~, \ A y 4- Green Hill Park ~ /~ ~~,,~- oa ..~. T~ eo< i'~~ ,~'J 3 `t `. Q l ',r ~, rdf PRQPOSEO IMPROVEMENTS HARBORWOOD RD 53 • • • ROANUKE CUUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FUR FY 04-05 REVENUE SHARING ~~/ qM aet! R ~ ~~, ~ Sutherland Cr ~* Rt.i192 e Lr ~y D~aS 1c~3 ,~ hry ~~;192 V R~' • 9 ~ThOrja '~ ~~" 3 Dr m d ~ ~`' ~ rp~~ y S~' ~~ SoYa-' ~°~~ ~_ G 4 ~ ~[ ~tg,C R (Pr/vq to SW ~r1 e~ wi/" CAMPBELL DR. ~'~ PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ST~NESKEEP LN. 55 i• i• RDANGKE COUNTY. DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 04-05 REVENLTE SHARING i ., y ~ ,, C2~,...i ,~_.. „K_ea9Y - _..._; ,` 1~6~ ~ Ct~ ~rL. ~' ,~~ ~ ,L- R a Lonsd~x~ P R ~Rt,I~ ~ a ^y bb/~ X; W nne P.~ ~ Rt. 131 --_ .. Rt, 144 ---.__ i-` ~ r ~, ~~' L n < ~~ Q ~`~ ~y co ..~ ~ ~~~ ~~ Iq4~ ~~ _~ ~s ~~ PP,GPGSED IMPRGVEMENTS J ~\\p ~ Sc hoo( Hidden ~,~ Hid en ti~alley~ Junior High School KEAGY RD. 57 • • • ROANOKE COUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 0~-05 REVENUE SHARING ~Q~Q,~~a ~~p`ta( ~r ~4~",~c' 0 ~~ e~`' ~,~ e 'i'cy two k,0 L° ~A~ .Q, ~~ ~~~ ~~,. C4~aw bQ ~~r~Py ~r PROPOSED IMPROVEMEtJTS CATAWBA CREEK RD. 59 • ROANOKE COUNTY ~~ PROPOSED IMPROVEMEtJTS BLACKSBURG RD. 61 DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FUR FY 04-05 REVENUE SHARING '• ROANOKE COUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 04-05 REVENUE SHARING i• • / ~~ ~, ~„~;,~ } Garst C ,gar .,._ Spar a '~ a ` e Qak R~.13 h SO aks P~ r ¢d ~~ PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS GARST MILL AREA ~~L ~~ ~~;, ~" ~ ~rPPh _~h _ '4 {~,'J e5 ~P~~~ 63 • ROANOKE COUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 04-05 REVENUE SHARING • ~`~,`''~ ~' ~ p ~N ro d R t .1032 5 ~ d ~ o~os ~ tad ~ ~r Rt, 1012 0 ~,~ ~ Missir~er Ct o-~~\ Rd Rt,1042 ti' ~~ \J ~' ~% `r--. ~~ ~h 1 ~.l' ~x 1 . 1~(a/ 14 ego Ln t,1064 fi 0 ei a ,- u PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TEMPLE DR. 65 ROANOKE CUUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 04-05 REVENUE SHARING • • ~`~ ~ ian ~ A y b I Lemke ~eStwQr ~~ \S 8 Rt,1lQ8 ~~' ~ ~Q4 9h~h qr ~ G Ade 1a2 ~ Middle ~cl~ool , e ~ ~~~ R \~ j1 ~,s~ 3`~ M ,~~ R~11 Gf .~~+ 0 LPG 1ti~~ envar Qa~~~ Zp '(° High School ~ ,1 G envar ~2~ Elementary Scho ¢,~,. ~a G~ ~ i ~~'~~~1 G'~ ~~~ ~~ ~;, ~1'~~\\ 1~5 e L ~~1 r Ma l ~+s Dh ~d ~~ PROPGSEO IMPROVEMENTS INGAL BL. 67 • • r~ ftOANOKE COUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 04-05 REVENUE SHARING ~4 tQ ~~ /O ~~- Highf (gilds ~~^ Qh~ T~ ~~o HIg4~fields ~ ~' Rt,1c02 Highfields ~cy Rt.l20r ~ ~ Ba k Creek Fi -e H e,, ~ompany 1 ~ ~~.~9~ '~~",, Bacl~Creek'R. scue SSclua escue 1 ~ z~h o ~`~ ~,o-~r ~,~ Back Creek M° Elementary- Schcx~l ~ V Bent `'~;, PP.~PGSED IMPROVEMENTS HIGHFIELDS FARM 69 I. i• ROANOKE COUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 04-05 REVENUE SHARING ~ W ~' ~ 5Qi W 3 r g Buckingham ~~ ~r ~o-~~ ~~ ~r7es ~r x.;• ~~ t,13~S S~3 .~. ,1664 ~ ~ ~+- ~o ~. ~~~~ Rt.1657 ~ Fontaine fey ~~ c~ xti / ~ d G` ~..~ \~/ ~~ Cr IJ~ ~r;teha ~t.17 42 ~ ~~ 166 -~ ~~ ~ o~to.t~e f' ' C r w ~~ N S 0 ~~ PP,OPOSED IMPROVEMENTS HYDE PARR DR. 71 • i• • ROANOKE COUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 04-05 REVENUE SHARING `\ ., " - W,'nter -.._..--~,~-1._ ~ -.~ _ _.. C _ ` ~ p ~~`Castle Rock ~ ~ Rd ,__Y__~_~--; L. '4 aq Cave S I" ~.. _ ~~702 1~~ _. ~ Library o 0 ~ Rd Ceda ~ ~ PO~~JO Lapps _ r .Ridge Rd.._--' _ Rd ~,~'~<<y~co _o \~g`O ~ ~g'I ~ P ti ~o ~n ~ o ~ Crest ~St 6' ° ~ 6 -----~--~ Meadow Ra ~ Rt1 s~8\~ ` ~r-~ 3 ~ Rq o` ~ °,, S`~ n t r S01 `~ ~~o ~r ~ ~-akeland ~Y ° ~' ~n Rt 1573 ~oQ a ~~ ~' ~~~~ Cave ~' ~uwano Qr Rt1543 l.n ! Rt1574 Cave SPC'~~ ~~^ I I c, R~ ~ 1~~ Sheila rn ton ~ Gr Farmingt n ~' o d Place Ct '~ ~w oc o v <cy~ ~ ~o O< a ~~ ~ ~~~ o ~~i ry Kettering U t ~Q 1~~ iQy^~~ Rt1981 O ~ ~ ~r a Chip / rr. PP,OPOSED IMPROVEMENTS FARMINGTON 73 • • ROANOKE COUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 04-05 REVENUE SHARING O ~J \ ~~ r~ 2 r o ~( ~ .~ j ~ ~ '` ~ ~ ~ 1 ~~ st ~~~ g22 \~~ ~' S~ ~~ ~~` ~~2 1 E~v~ °°d 3 0 ~°` O ~ P~~ 8~ ~ ~,~ `b ~ ~~, ~ ~ 1 t~ S~ ~~, i R~~ g,24 1 1 ~~ ~~ PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS MANOR ST. 75 ~i • • ROANOKE COUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 04-05 REVENUE SHARING ~ ~- \~~ f ~ ~~ E/~ ~~~-_ _ ~..--~ -_~.._ i c~ ~r~~-_ ___ --_ -` ~--_ ~ R~ - ~--. ~~~ ~,~~ ; .~~~mm~~ -_.__ d _.=~ ~, o _. .,. ~ ~ `~ ~ ~~ ~ .~ .- N ~ ~ 1 \~ c~ ~ o ~ v~ ~ I /~ / ~ , ~~ PR4P~SED IMPROVEMENTS GIRARD DR ~~ • • • ROANOKE COUNTY DESIGNATION OF FUNDS FOR FY 04-05 REVENUE SHARING ~~ ge^d e oYSeyro N w rn 1 ~\ J...---~~.r- 4 _ t I%,f HORSE SHOE PR~PGSED IMPROVEMENTS BEND RD 79 Q• 0 N r ~w m ~~ W W O~ N Z ,Wn LWL V 1~ ao OZ 0 Q ~"" LL W O u- Z U O Z j Y NW~/ O LL Z Q ,Z oO V '^. W~ ~ W W J J Q Q N .W ~~ . W ~ ~ e ~~ z c~ ~~} z z z z z z z z z z a mho o ~ S ~ 8 ~ 8 ~ S ~ S ~ S ~ 8 ~ S ~ S ~ S z8o ~g>~ > o Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N p S ~L o ~ o ~ o ~ o ~L o ~ o ~ o ~Z o ~ o rz o m ~ N ~ N ~ N ~ N ~ N ~ N ~ N ~ N ~ N ~ N m a o~ a ~ r ~ } r r ~ } r ~ r a wu9 S~z aor -~ z z z z z z z z z z m~ w ~ U Q ~ ~ U N J a U ~ ° m °o ~ ~ °w °m ° w ~ v r~i co ~ oo m a LL U a LL U o~ a LL oo~ LL o~, LL ornz LL z o~, J V- X00 r V- ~;o ~ LL ~" 00 N fn ~oW ~ N fn ~~'ow (n W g~°oZ° (n O g~°oZ° (n ~ ~ (`') ~WN~ ~ M ~ (Mp N~ gW Z ~ t00 ~~ gW W ~ N ~~~w~ F- g~ (/~ ~ ~w~Z°~ ~~ ~ FF ZF-H~ ~wF-~ WF-W ~~F-W ~~~F- F ~F-Z~ ~ LLZZ~ LLN~~ (nO ~ W W F- ~~ v ~~ U ~~ ~~ ~z Or ~ ~~Ocn ~OW o0~ ~ ~~°Fa- lL LL Il LL lL H ~y F- r F- ~ LL (n O ~ ~ o c'7 v N cD (~ cD ('7 v N ao ~ co ~ ao W 0 _ ~ f' ~ C~ I~ O r r (p O cD O O N O N I~ a N a~ LLZ! LL O O O O O O r r ~ O J Q } Z LL LL ~ y ~"'~Z ~ ~ J aza a V' ~ ~t O O tt (07 ~ c~7 N ~ Z t0 (D o0 a0 sr c'7 c0 N r Of ~ = V Z N r> v c~ cn ro m a N o V o N ~ ~ LL .... Q (A /A to (A 69 di 69 b9 b9 fA Z ~ t0 CO N N a0 t0 O ~ M ~ O ~ Z m ^ CO C7 t0 ~ 00 ch CD c'7 7 t0 f7 ~D tD N N V N O O ` q ~a~ 0 U Z U u> erg v- vi en di to vi to en U ~ ~ ~ ~ Z ° W ~ a ~ V ~ ~ ~ ~ o~p ~ O ~ O ~ ~ a ~ ~ a N ° j ° ~ r m ~ ~ N ~ ° ~ fO•J ~ (~ f'~ R~ wok ~ ~ Zr Zr z ~° ` g ~° 3`° 'U ~Za W o~ W ~~ ~~ ~F FW- ~~ H ~~ H ~~ FW- ~ d'~ m~ YH Z~ a R m J °~ J °~ J ~ ~ z ~ 0 0 0 o g ~ ~ O ~ D A 0 V V A OIL n M O r V co V ~D 9 ~ yf r .a 0 N 00 r W m ~ ~ ~ W ~ Z W W ~ H Qa ao Li. O Z ~ L ""~ T 1 Z y Z ~ ~ ~ ~- W ~ W ~ U O ZjY ~ W O Q Z o ~ ' V N O W ~-' LL M f0 M to N co M ~O c -~ ~ W ~ M - a J M W Q J ~ Q ~ ~ r U Z U W ~/ I.L Q i- ~ ~ W ~ / N 0 ~W W} Z Z Z z Z Z Z Z Z Z d z a Y m F O F H F I- F- F F F F- F- ~wov o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ozop o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30>~ > > > > > > > > > > O W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ s ~ s F Z ~ N ~ ~ ~ N ~ !j ~ N ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ N Y O F- ~ F ~ F ~ F- ~ F- F- ~ F- ~ F- f- ~ F- ~ 0 z o Z o Z o Z o z o z o z o Z o Z a Z o O W a o Q o Q o a o a o Q o a o Q o Q o a o m ~ J N a J N a J N a J N LL J N a J N a J N a J N a J N a J N a r~ mz~ ~oc~ a z r r r r r r r r r r aWw a~ W W o ° o} z z z z z z z z z z -~ _ mZ ~- W Z DU ` a ~ 7 ~ U to ~ r J Q U O v O v O o O O n O n O n O n O n O n _ = W w (O c0 (O ~ ~ ~n ~ ~n N ~n a LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL p O NO ON O OO oO~n NO _ Z Z O N NOM M ~ (n R !n V Q' M Q' M fn V W ? W' M ~ M _ O (n O M a' O V ~ V fM0 ~ f00 OD ~ N ~ pNp ~ ~ N fn M W' ~ ~' ~ M fn ~ 2' e- R' r V ~ V ~ N ~ ~ V' fn <! N ~ ~ r 'Q fn R .- Q' r O O 'F- W S W •- F-W~W W ~ O> ~ r-W OW ~- W W WF-H W WF..W W W '- E-W f' W W ~ W ~ F-WFW W ~ W ~ WSW W e- O •- W W O ~ W ~ pWF-W r' W ~ WSW Q LL ?~?~ O ?~ ~ ~ _~Z~ O N _~Z~ O Z~Z~ ~ O Z~Z~ ~ O Z~?~ ~ O O Z~ ~ ~ F- ~Z~ ~+ O Z~Z~ ~ O ~ LL H p LL F'- F~- F- LL f- LL F- F- LL - F- F ~ _ a ~ ~ ' W ~ ~ ~ O V M V M V M V M t0 M c0 M . 30_ moo-. O N O O N V O Z d~ (O O N O N ~ O O O O O W LL .~ O O O O O O O O O O J O r O ~ z jZ~= r r r r r r r r r r LL3~n LL ~ ~z era ¢ a a a a a a a a a O~ -~ Z ~ Z 2 2 Z 2 2 Z Z ~za a O OD n f0 sr f0 V N O ~ m N m O O) n O V M N O Z N V N m N N O _ ~ ,,,~ ~ n t0 n N M r N M U Z w F- LL a ~ vi en us w of of » vi w ~n Z pp ~p ~p ~ N O n ~ N p r v v rn m rn rn rn M o r F- m ~ r n N ~ ~O ~ n 01 N to M r N N O M Z w p~,.. 0 U 2 ~ en fn w » » vi » of vi e» J ~ O ~ a# o 0 0 O 0 o O a 0 F Z~ J m "'~ O J O D O ~ O J •- ~ O ~ ~ ~ J ~ ~ O J ~ ~ J ~ 7 J ~ U W W WOF a ~ Om a •- pm a .-- Oao W O J ao `- , [L r' ao •- m~ m~" a0~ _ ~- oZO 3 W o~ 3 W o~ 3 W o~ d W ~~ J W ar -~ W a~ J W a~ J W a~ J W a~ -~ W aF ~-] J~ J~ J~ W 2' C~K U' n' U' ~ U2' UQ' C7 a' d Q. m J J J ~ Z Z Z Z Z Z O ~ _ _ M O • O N r LIJ m ~ W ~D Z W W Q Q ~ 0 O Z _ ~ Z Z ~ ~ ~ ~ W ~ ~ - U O ~ W Z j Y W ~ Z ~... Z O O , V N 0 W ~ v O M V N n o0 W O co N "' O '° J M W ~ J N Q ~ w U U Z _ W '"' N 1 I.I.. ~ W ~? z z z z z z z z z z c9~wi' a z Y m i:. O F- F- F- F- F- ~ F- ~ F- H ~ w O U O O O O O O O O O O OzoO o 0 0 0 0 o O o ~ o O w ~ ~ ~ ~ >S ~ ~ >S 25 ~ I- Z ~ ~ ~ N ~ lj ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ (j ~ ~ Y O F- ~ I- ~ F ~ F- ~ F- ~ F- ~ F- ~ F ~ H ~ F ~ 0 Z o Z o Z o Z o Z o Z o Z o Z o Z o Z o O W Q o Q o Q o Q o a o Q o a o Q o Q o a o 3 m a N a N ~ N ~ N a N Q. N 4. N D. N ~ N 4. N } F m ~ ~ a~7~ aw a~ w°w gip} ,. z z z z z z z z z z mZ ~ w W ~ U a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ v i ~ v i v i ai v i t% v i N t n ~ ~ ~ U tq } a V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° r°i o 0 _~ N N N M N N N M M wa LL rn W rn rn rn ~ m W m rn W m 0 m w m o ON U O N a U '- a LL O v v W v U~g~ Q' .-- M .- ~ W ~ ^~ .- - '-~•- ~ ~ M ~ -~ - '-~.- ~ M~ _ ~~ M ~ of~o N Q' N - tno N ~ N p W -- o ~n N O W cn °r t7v ~ O R' M W v~v M r M ~ •- 0 0 ~ F- W ~ o ~ H W o W M • W° W W • o • F W p W ~ O ~ W p W W ~ f- W O W ~ W • W F' W W • F- W~~ ~ W~~ ~ F- F ~- W O W p W " ?~o~ Z~~~ -~o~ Z~o~ ~ Z~o~ ~- -~Z~ O Z~ ~ -~ ~ ?~?~ O -~o~ LL F ~ ~ F LL ~ U U ~ F o~~ v v v v v o 0 0 co ao _ M M M M M N N N N N O ~ _ ~ F p ^ CZ7 d~ W LL M O O M O O M O O M O O M O O O ~ O V O O N M O M r O 1~ O O J Q ~ W ~ ? j Z p' _ } } } ~- } ~- } } } } LL LL ~ ~ F ~ Z ~} a Q Q Q Q a a a a a O m -~ Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z ~za a C7 ~n Q1 v> 01 u~ O ~n W ~n m o N w O v (D co O 0 h Z y r n 1~ r r ~ sT N a V = O^ r r r ~ r M .- t0 M U Z r+ ~ LL v '~ a Z Q ~ O N O N O ~ O~ 47 W O N CO O 7 O (O O O h } F- r r r r r N V N V V .- M •- f0 M Z m N v p F U Z ~ » w w fA en vi of vi erf r» U U ~ -~ #a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q' o 2 0 ~ Z V U V ~ V V u> O O a LL O J J~ WO~ U ~ U V ~ W ~ F~ ~ LL (A~ l L ~~ ~ V Q M p~ J uJ a y O a,ZO a~ ?~ W~ ~~ Z~ w~ ~~ w~ a~ a~ LL m Z LL LL ~ LL _J _J O ~ ~ ( ~ = S 2 2 _ = O O N ~ r W m ~ ~ LL W ~ Z W W (~ F- a o n . O Z N I.L Q '"' Z i Z ~ ~ ~ u- W p LL ~ U ~ Z W Z j Y 0 w ~/ Z I.L. Q Z o O ' V N O W ~" ~ LL M O M (fl f0 M ~ ~O o0 W o M rn v, v1 ~ v W Q J N Q » w " U Z W . ~ ~ N W N N ° ~ ? W W z z z z z z z z z z C7~w} Q Z Y m~ O N F F F- F- F- F- F F- F- ~ W O U O O O O O O O O O O O Z O O O O O O O O O O O O 30>~ > > > > > > > > > > o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z ~ ~ ~ ~ N N ~ N ~ ~ Y O F- ~ ~ ~ F ~ H ~ F ~ f- ~ !- ~ !- ~ F- ~ Z ~" Z ~ O Z o Z o Z o Z o Z o Z o Z o Z o o o O W Q o Q o Q o Q o Q o Q o Q o Q o Q o Q o m 3 J N a J N a J N a J N a J N a J N a J N a J N a J N a J N a r~ mW~ ~°c~ r r r } r ~ r r r } a Z aww a~ w°w c~ > z D -~ ~ Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z ~ O ~ ~. m Z F W W O U Q H F- F H F- F- F F- F- F- 7 ~ j U tq W ~" Q O O O O O O O J U p o 0 0 0 M 0 M 0 M 0 M 0 M 0 M 0 M 0.' 2 M M M ~ ~ .- ~ ~ ~ .- w w a LL LL p N~ n n o n LL N ° LL LL ~ p M LL M~ (O LL (O ~ (O LL LL (O p M M G M LL M p 0 LL O d a ~ (n ~ (n O ~' n 2' (O LL7 ~ N c0 rD t0 N N Z K O W N N O ~ O K tp n N (n n c0 LL' O n (n M O 2' N (n W (n O K ~ ~ N ~~~ K ~ ~ 7 fn M ~ K O N M (n M c0 LL' u7 O p ~ F W ~ W ~ F- W F"' W ~ o ~" W p W W ~ O p I- W f" W W ~ W f" W .- W ~ W F' W r W ~ W~ W LL1 ~ W ~ H W~ W l11 ~ 0 ~ W W O ~ W •- W S W e- W W ~"' W LL zf--?~ ~ r t- z~ ~ ° z~?F t-zF. zr-?~- 0 zf-?F- ~ o zF-O~ ~ ~ °r?~- 0 zF-?~- 0 o LL F ~ ~ LL ~ 0 LL F 0 1-- F- F- LL F F O~ X LLLLII t0 M O M O N O N O N O N ~ M ~ M O N O (V 3LL_ 0 x~ O~ `~ _ 0 ~ z a ~ o 0 0 o O 0 O O 0 O 0 O O W LL "' O O O O J O > w ~ ? ~ Z ~ } ~ ~ ~ } r r ~ >- r r x l=LLL3N ~ ~ Z ~~'a a a Q Q Q a a a a a O~ J Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z ~za a C~ ~ M OD t0 O t0 f0 n N ~ (O N O 01 N t0 Z ~ n ~ ~ R O O .- w y 2 O~ ~ M ~ V N N tD ~ N N UZw+ F LL ... Q f9 (A f9 di IA IA (A f9 f9 (A Z N O O O N a N ~ N (O Q M v (O .- CO n n ~n ~ c0 v O o Of o ~ '' ao ~- F- m _ ~ M r V N N <O N N 2 w O ~ 0 U Z ~ en en vi rn w of vi W to vi J U ~ O ~ O ~ O ~ a~ #~ LL' R' Z O Z N Z N Z N Z N Z N Z N Z N ~ Z W ~ n ~ n O M O ~n O ~n D O N c0 O ~n t0 O ~n I- O p ~n F- O O an F- O W Q F ~- v -' Q M a W Q M °. w H t0 z W ~- (O z W ~- < z W F z W H z W z W z W z w O ~ ? j w t- o ~ w F-- O ~ F ~ ~ F- ~ ~ F- ~ ~ F- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ F- ~ ~ F- ~ ~ F- ~ K a m = _ ~ ~ LL LL LL LL LL Q O l i ti ,` 2.d. ROADS CONSIDERED FOR REVENUE SHARING, BUT NOT FUNDED • Lofton Road and Tamarack Trail were considered, but funds were insufficient. Staff will review them again next year. r~ U LJ 89 • ~ • _ -_---- fi _~ --= --_-- ~~ ~ =~ --~ _ _- ____=-_ _ _ - ---. ~ i Ob'021 SNIIIOH ~ ® K _ ~ „$ ~SS y 43~_~~. ^~ .._ ~ , ~--~ 4S- ~-.s--~~,~.~ 1-`~ '~~ r - ~-1~ S~ ;~SS rr~~7~' ~~j~^ . ~a - ~ 4 - ~ °~ `~'- t- - ••N{17SJ.~.I:1,J~~~ ~'} •- - _:.t~ __ c-v"{7~ __ -- ~ ,, .tea } ~ \ ~ ~ O~ ~ * ~ I I t I ~ ~ 200' DECELERA'~N ~~ LANE - ' ~ ~.~ `T' I '~ ~ I ~ 0~ \ ~ - I ~ Ul ~ ~ i o .' ~~~ ~ ~ ii 1~ I - ~I S V ~ \ i I 1 ; ~ ,n ru ~ • ---~-- f r._ --------- ---.-~--.--~---._.._.._. -;~~.__.._..-- -~ i d32it~ 1N3W39t/Nt1W~ / ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I - -, ` ~ i 2131dMW2lO1S ~ ~ ~-'~ ~ ~~ , '-+ .- ~~. 11111' I -_ -~ i- O~ / - V r -\ l@`. `tc ~ - - 1 T , - ~ _ ---"` 1 - -- 11 t ~ +,fia - S ___ '* f _-' ~_ C '~ +, ~'~ ....~ m.. 39VZIOlS /12~ ~2~3MO1 m~ ° 0 L ~ ~ ' r-- - ----- -"'m ~ _yi-aro ., ~ '. I , 'o ~.: _ . - - --S-11PlA- RA-d-X,9~ ~~3"ddfl p r W ____-- ---~ ~ fTl p N __------ ~ 1 - -~ -.- CT -- -vrf3 _ 1 ~ rte, ~ ~ Fd`9t9 +Y ~-~` r ~ -~._~-____. - ,u i, i ~~ --- ----------------------------s1~Nn ,o ~ x,o~ _ ~ _ - , _.-- -- - i - o -___________________-_____------ -~`~- ~ - _ o w 0 _~ _ /: ~ --~ m - f -: P .I ____~_____-___ ~. _____.___-. _ ,,.~.- _ _ N W W -' p~ ~- O ~' '~~ - ' i '---------------- ~` J x -~,- _~~ oa ~I I i ~ _._____-------~ -S1tfVlfi-O~l~f-0~ ~ ~ - ~ ---__--- • --___ ` • -~--- ~-z_-_ •-- - - " ~, _ ~~ _ -' ~- - ---- r- ~ ------ __ , _.- `--__ -i------------r_-_____ V Y r ~ ------------ --=---~ --~ --- Y _ -. - --~ -~ - --..__.--~ I _ _.._ ,. _ ~'' . A /\ _ HpLLINS RD. ~ -~ ~ .m~ SOD m ZrZ*rn m to ~~ -~ Z '~ ~ rao o~ C7 D C7 ~ rn z ~~ ~ L,n~ ~p_ .. =1 m=1 DSO D'i~ m ~ro~~m0 ZZ~ Oar °~ Z n~ n nwu~v w mm ()v wm O~ O~ Ohm SOT vOZ t~ n~~roinm y~v Oz ~~ Z- Z Z cn „D- O _ c ~ o_ W Zn z"~ z N~c~ ivr~ m ~mtntnq_ ~ to m0 cn mszo mtn m t„ m wa~D z $y~v~7~ mOm n I ~ nj0niOi 5~D 3Z m ~ m ~ -a;^.;^.;~ c~~ n-I =-ncn ~bo o~ D v-n~ ~ p O ~ o-..-...~~~- ~1i~0 Om G~< ~~ ~ -I •~ x ~ m~o-n cnG~z -Iwoom~ooz z O~ c-in mm i p•• O~ O ~(~~ j~0 -_t ?Irm v~- ~vv~~or ,~$-~'~$ ~mm u a o ~ m a om Dc O nvn D ~ c~c~c~c~c~~ cncmG~° m m ~ !~ X X ~ ~~ gm m z ~~v mn~p zx x X x'x O =~R17°'~T~ ~~p Nrn o ~ ~ ~ ~ z ~ ~ -~ w0 II'O~ O-+I~mn ~'s~ ~~N~ocn~Zm1~ 2 ~ ° W o Z Z ~ ~ o ? mA ~ 3D NN OoD p~m v~°o°o °ot°nc°nm ~ cn ~ ~~ o ~ r ~ ~ ~ O !7 •o r~rri~1 oom Do DOC G~TTTT'~1D m O ,~' o n n n z R~1 C C N D "ao ~T -<Z m u m ~+NO'~ m n ~ DD ~ m ~ < n h miu ~N7G7 II~o ~~ ~o°ooT~n D~D~n m ~ `<~ f,~D D~ .A O~ ~~ ."1D7TTT ~ ~ D ~ ~ ~ D -n ~ ~n N to m ~ -~ 5", ~ m z O ~ m `` a ~~~ D ~i ~~ m m ~ Z ~ ~ ~ cDjb~ ma ~ ~ ~ frl ~ Z ~ N°oO ~c `~ v n ~l7 m cmn ton ~~n ~° Z -" ~ -n m x ... .-I -o (_!) m O ~ ~ m N ~ ~ ~ i to m N N N O Z ~ r D ~ m ~ W w ~ n ~ .. 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ O O N ~ I I I ~ N O O p O G ~ n n v v ~ ~ ~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~,~~t,~~LFi~~~~~t o ~D ~ p's~ ° .. 3~v~mrD ~, 3 ~ .~ = CONCEPTUAL LAYOUT GG~SULTING EAfGlAfEERS ~ oa••~ n • ~ 11~17N1 WAREHOUSE FACILITYFOR Z ~, 819 Naff Road Boones Miil, Virginia 24065 ~ ~+ O ~.. a BERK, LLC (540) 334-4294 Fax: (540) 334-4293 • o o Email: providenceC~metwood.com .~ ROANOKE, VIRGINIA o ~~~ w