Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
6/22/1993 - Adopted Board Records
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 22, 1993 RESOLUTION 62293-1 OF CONGRATULATIONS TO MARK LEE FOR RECEIVING THE DISTINGUISHED SERVICE AWARD FROM THE ROANOKE REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE WHEREAS, crime prevention is an important function for any police department, and depends to a large extent on the alertness and responsiveness of the citizens of the area; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Police Department encourages the residents of the County to assist the Department in preventing and solving crimes; and WHEREAS, Mark Lee, a resident of Roanoke County, was recently instrumental in assisting the Police Department in arresting two suspects; and WHEREAS, Mr. Lee, without regard for his personal safety, rendered valuable aid to one of Roanoke County's law enforcement officers by detaining one of the suspects; and WHEREAS, Mr. Lee was recently honored by the Roanoke Regional Chamber of Commerce for his actions, and received the 1993 Distinguished Service Award from the Chamber. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby extends its congratulations to MARK LEE for the recognition he received from the Regional Chamber; and FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board also extends its thanks to Mr. Lee for his willingness to be involved in assisting the Police Department in their duties. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Resolutions of Congratulations File John Cease, Chief, Police Department A-62293-2 ACTION NO. ITEM NO. -L — AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 22, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Appropriation to Fund an Engineering & Feasibility Study for Expansion of the Roanoke County/Salem Jail COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: 1 support Sheriff Holts request for $15,000 for a feasibility study for expansion of the jail. Because of the long lead tine for prcjects such as this, it is wise to begin the process now. I also believe the Sheriff has taken a conservative approach to the problen. He is not requesting a large regional jail as was proposed several years ago, or evenmajor expansion of the building. He anticipates being able tomeet the denands of the jail for years in the future by double bunking and finishing an area provided for expansion when the jail was built. BACKGROUND: The Roanoke County/Salem Jail Facility averaged a daily population of 140 during the calendar year 1992; and during the first five months of 1993, the daily inmate population has averaged 147. This is for Roanoke County and Salem prisoners only, and does not include any Federal prisoners. The facility has 104 beds designated for general inmate population. Our population has peaked to 190 inmates at times due to the large number of inmates sentenced to serve jail time on weekends. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Sheriff's Office recommends that an engineering study be conducted to determine the feasibility of completing the sixth floor in the design of a dormitory. This expansion would add an additional 37 beds. If the study determines that each of the 104 general inmate population cells can be double bunked per the minimum standards, we project this move would enable Roanoke County and the City of Salem to meet the demands in corrections through the year 2005, based upon the previous five years' inmate population growth in the Roanoke County/Salem Jail Facility The Sheriff's Office requests that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors appropriate the necessary funds for the engineering and feasibility studies. The estimated cost for the study is approximately $15,000. When Requests for Proposals are returned, it is recommended that the County ask the City of Salem to fund their appropriate share of the cost or 22.72% per the existing contract. FISCAL IMPACT: The estimated cost of the study is $15,000. These funds could be appropriated from the Capital Fund Reserve. D-1 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors appropriate $15,000 from the Capital Fund Reserve to conduct an engineering and feasibility study on expansion of the Roanoke County/Salem Jail, and that the City of Salem be requested to reimburse Roanoke County for their share of the cost. Respectfully submitted, Gerald S. Holt Sheriff Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) cc: File Gerald Holt, Reta Busher, Diane Hyatt, John Cease, Appro d by, Elmer C. Hodge, Jr. County Administrator ACTION Motion by: Bob L. Johnson motion to approve $15,000 funding Sheriff Director, Management & Budget Director, Finance Chief of Police VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy x Johnson x Kohinke x Minnix x Nickens x ACTION NO. A -62293-3.a Item No. co� CLOO AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: June 22,1993 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Public Private Partnership funds for Lingerfelt Development Corporation COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: Lingerfelt Development Corporation (LDC) is constructing an office building for the Jefferson National Forest (U.S. Forest Service at Valleypointe in the Hollins Magisterial District). Roanoke County has previously sold LDC a tract of surplus land for stormwater management purposes for this project. Alan Lingerfelt is requesting Roanoke County to fund utility connection fees for this project. FISCAL IMPACT: The Economic Development fund has an unallocated balance of $95,427 as of June 15, 1993. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Lingerfelt Development Corporation is constructing a 27,000 square foot office building on 3.64 acres at Valleypointe. Estimated value of the land and new facility is $1,125,000. Real estate taxes for the new facility are estimated to be $15,000. The Jefferson National Forest and several small federal offices will relocate about 100 employees from the Poff Federal Building to this new facility. The cost of connections for water and sewer are calculated to be $15,545. Payback for the County's investment of 50/50 Public Private Partnership funds for connection fees are $7,772.50. Payback would occur within the first year after completion of the project. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Roanoke County enter into a Public Private Partnership with Lingerfelt Development Corporation and invest up to $7,772.50 towards the cost of connections to Roanoke County's water and sewer systems. Respectfully submitted: Timothy W. GUballa, Director Department of Economic Development Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Attachment ACTION Approved: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Motion by: Harry C. Nickens motion to approve No Yes Abstain Eddy x Johnson _x _ Kohinke _x _ Minnix _x _ Nickens x _ cc: File Timothy W. Gubala, Director, Economic Development 2)_aa. F a oo � o m o0 0 0 ,o amu, �Qee a U : 0 0 0 0 0 0 -• 0 0 0 -» c u Q G � o 6 v m 0. CL v •• - O O — — -r uU .•r N V A � � tYtpp qq eepp A R U U Y r'1 N N1 N N P1 N G M — N t'1 — .••, .-. N1 U ry Y Z O fj V G a U Z O o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -- o oco 0 ^o • a � u � c Y O a g U n C. .- y V A rN Y co Cl C cJ G C- O �. O -+ o O ^� O cJ G 2 O O O ^+ o O p O vl G Ula Y C E u G — O O E u u Y A CL — .r N N .••, ... N .•+ N ..•, �. y m C 7 � O u v� G r 0 A Y ca c O U a � u — co u a c c A p u B L/NGERFELT April 30, 1993 Mr. Elmer Hodge County Administrator of Roanoke 3738 Brambleton Avenue Roanoke, Virginia 24018 Dear Elmer: RE: Jefferson National Forest Project As we discussed, we are nearing construction start on the Jefferson Project referenced above in Valleypointe. The project is approximately a 25,000 square foot office facility which will house 110-120 employees. The tenant is relocating out of the City of Roanoke. Due to the considerable economic impact to the County of Roanoke created by this relocation, I am hereby requesting that the County waive the water and sewer connection charges approximating $15,000 for this project. I appreciate very much your cooperation and understanding in this matter. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me. I look forward to an early reply. Sincerely, LINGERFELT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION U4.17, , Alan T. Lingerelt, P.E. Chief Executive Officer The Lingerfelt Companies - 12 South Third Street- Richmond, VA 23219 9 (804) 644-9111 - Telecopier: (804) 783-9969 ACTION NO. A -62293-3.b Item No. Q AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER IN ROANOKE, VA ON TUESDAY, MEETING DATE: June 22, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Request for approval of Public Private Partnership funds for Hampton Inn COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: V � f�-y YTiZt'C EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Granger Macfarlane has requested consideration of Public Private Partnership funds for the expansion of the Hampton Inn on Thirlane Road (Catawba) Magisterial District. FISCAL IMPACT: The Economic Development fund has an unallocated balance of $95,427 as of June 15, 1993. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Granger Macfarlane has obtained a building permit to expand the Hampton Inn on Thirlane Road. Property improvements are planned for an increase from 48 to 72 rooms, the addition of a swimming pool and the development of a conference area. The new facility will total 21,363 square feet on 4.02 acres. Estimated value of land and construction is approximately $1.4 million. Real estate taxes on the land/building would be $14,908. Other taxes generated from transient occupancy tax, business license, and sales tax are estimated to be $63,663. The total annual estimated taxes on the project are $78,571. The cost of utility connections for water, sewer, and fire are $29,900. The readopted Public Private Partnership Policy would allocate $14,950 for this project. Payback from new taxes for the County's investment of funds for utility connection fees would occur within the first year after project completion and occupancy. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Roanoke County enter into a 50/50 Public Private Partnership with Granger Macfarlane for the Hampton Inn expansion and invest $14,950 into the utility fund for this project. A reimbursement of $14,950 would be made to Granger Macfarlane from the Utility Fund for his prepayment of connection fees. Respectfully submitted: Timothy W. Guba a, Director Department of Economic Development Approved: ACTION No Yes Abstain Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens Eddy x Denied ( ) motion to approve Johnson x _ Received ( ) Kohinke x _ Referred Minnix x _ to Nickens x Attachment cc: File Timothy W. Gubala, Director, Economic Development Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION No Yes Abstain Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens Eddy x Denied ( ) motion to approve Johnson x _ Received ( ) Kohinke x _ Referred Minnix x _ to Nickens x Attachment cc: File Timothy W. Gubala, Director, Economic Development Eastern cAfotbr Inns, Inc. Post Office Box 201 Roanoke, Virginia 24002 (703)344-5531 June 10, 1993 Mr. Timothy W. Gubala Director, Department of Economic Development County of Roanoke P. 0. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 RE: Hampton Inn - Thirlane Road Dear Tim: I have your memorandum of June 9 and I thank you for it. As you have advised me, I have paid, under protest, the water and sewer connection fees of $29,900.00, so as not to be held up any longer and to obtain our building permit. It is my understanding that at least $14,950.00 will be refunded to Eastern Motor Inns. Eastern's protest is based upon an inconsistent county policy which unfairly and unreasonably favors certain business developments, while discriminating against other developments. Allied Signal Company and Cox Cable Company, among others, were not required to pay any water or sewer connection fees while Eastern Motor Inns is required to pay these same fees. The fact that the fees are exhorbitant and that Eastern has operated in the county for 21 years, are only small parts of our complaint. The overriding factor is we just feel we should be offered the same incentives for develop- ment and be treated on these matters as other companies are treated. I would appreciate the opportunity to visit with you, Elmer Hodge, Paul Mahoney and Chairman Fuzzy Minnix about these matters at your earliest convenience. I look forward to hearing from you. JGM:sjo cc Elmer Hodge Very truly Yours, J. Gr 1 Macifa/rlane `Eastern CXotor Inns, Inc. Post Office Box 201 Roanoke, Virginia 24002 (703) 344-5531 May 10, 1993 Mr. Tim Gubala Director, Economic Development County of Roanoke, Virginia P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018 Dear Tim: As requested, following are some pro -forma figures at an aggressive, but reasonable, occupancy rate for our new Hampton Inn on Thirlane Road which will open in December, 1993. Our experience on Franklin Road indicates that I should be pretty close. 76 Rooms x 365 days . . . . . . . . . . . 27,740 Assumed Occupancy x 85% Average Daily Rate 23,579 x$45.00 Gross Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,061,055. 5% Rooms Tax 1% from State Sales Tax x .06% Total County Sales Tax Revenue $ 63,663. Tim, plus real estate and personal property taxes yet to be determined. It looks like we are talking around $85,000 plus per year to the County. I trust this is Very sincer J. Granger ar President JGM/rw 1pful. Please call me later this week. Thanks. S, 2 0 0 0 0 0 E.. a w 00 00 00 00 C .J. r- dd 0 0 c u J ° E o ° o c v 8 m J C N J 7 p .. ... O O O O .ten e _C n el h L v o O u.rNv ° a N en N en N N e'1 N C t en J G N C 4 C n v J Cp v U -S b JZ q zOF M oo r lun CD - Ci O J G ^ = u C. W w G u rN F. ZL4F:. 0 0 0 -- 0 0 0 o o \ c 0 0 v� c �v u & E E E E U U C V O C L• .r ... N N ^... N .+ N .. N N CO A 7 C o u > 7 U t c E o u m x u o A Z x CIL z a AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 22, 1993 RESOLUTION 62293-4 URGING THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY TO ENACT STRONGER D.U.I. LEGISLATION WHEREAS, recent senseless and tragic deaths in the Roanoke Valley attributed to drivers operating their motor vehicles while under the influence of alcohol have brought to focus the need for more effective D.U.I. legislation in the State of Virginia; and WHEREAS, these most recent accidents indicate a need for much stricter penalties for violations involving not only driving under the influence of alcohol, but also for persons abusing their limited privilege to drive on a restricted or suspended license; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the Board wishes to strongly urge the Roanoke Valley's legislators to support stricter D.U.I. legislation in the upcoming session of the Virginia General Assembly. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: `fi'2cz�.�, �• Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 1 cc: File Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney John H. Cease, Police Chief George R. Pelton, 6520 Peters Creek Rd, Roanoke, VA 24019 The Honorable L. Douglas Wilder, Governor The Honorable Stephen D. Rosenthal, Attorney General The Honorable J. Brandon Bell, Virginia Senate The Honorable Malfourd W. "Bo" Trumbo, Virginia Senate The Honorable G. Steven Agee, Virginia House of Delegates The Honorable C. Richard Cranwell, Virginia House of Delegates The Honorable Clifton A. Woodrum, Virginia House of Delegates The Honorable A. Victor Thomas, Virginia House of Delegates 2 ACTION NUMBER A-62293-5 ITEM NUMBER"' AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER. MEETING DATE: June 22, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Acceptance of a grant by the Police Department for Community Crime Prevention Services. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: OL j e BACKGROUND: The Roanoke County Police Department applied for a grant to expand the existing Crime Prevention Program with a full time civilian Crime Analyst for fiscal year 93-94. The grant has been approved by the Department of Criminal Justice Services (DCJS) in the amount of $33,070.00. FISCAL IMPACT• The grant is for $24,801.00 in DCJS federal funds (75%) and $8,269.00 in local funds (25%). The criteria of the grant requires a hard dollar match of local funds. The local match will be taken out of existing police department funds for community crime prevention services. No additional funds will be requested. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Staff recommends acceptance of the grant from the Department of Criminal Justice Services. Respectfully submitted, ohn H. Cease Chief of Police Approved by, Mr. Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens Denied ( ) motion to accept grant Eddy Received ( ) Kohinke Referred ( ) Minnix To Johnson Nickens cc: File John Cease, Chief of Police cc: File Chief Cease VOTE No Yes Abs ACTION NO. A-62293-6 ITEM NO. D)—,5 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 22, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Acceptance of LSCA Grant from the Virginia State Library & Archives COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Library staff and Board of Trustees request that the County accept a Library Services and Construction Act Grant in the amount of $32,576. This competitive grant has been awarded to the Library for the purpose of extending and improving services to older adults (those aged 60 to 65, and older). Acceptance of the grant will provide funds for personnel support to establish a variety of programs and to purchase materials and other items which can be used beyond the one year term of the grant. The grant includes funding for the purchase of a van. BACKGROUND: Over the years the Library has received a number of LSCA grants which have helped the County to improve library services. This grant is the largest nonconstruction grant ever awarded to Roanoke County, and is one of the larger grants in the Virginia LSCA program. The project funded by the grant is designed to meet a broad range of needs among older adults, but will target some very specific needs identified in a survey of local nursing homes, life care centers, and retirement homes. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Roanoke County Public Library's service area contains more than 10,700 persons of age 65 or older. Census projections indicate that this segment of the population will continue to grow. Due to decreased mobility, health related problems, and changes in living status, this age group frequently requires assistance beyond the bounds of traditional library services. The expanding older population will increasingly need to have the library, and its services, brought directly to them, and it will also require a more intensive type of interaction in order to ensure the delivery of quality services. This grant project will provide personnel funds and equipment which will enable the Library to more effectively extend services to older adults. The initial investment funds to start such a program are not available in the Library's local budget. The project will take the Library to residents of the area's nursing homes, congregate care centers, senior meal sites, and retirement centers. All of these serve the senior community in a variety of ways and delivering traditional book related materials to these sites is one method of reaching the population group that this project addresses. Additionally, the specific needs of the elderly will be met through a variety of programs that are non-traditional and yet vital to the stimulation, involvement and participation that older citizens often need and seek. The project is designed to reach a population group which has been underserved in the past. FISCAL IMPACT: There will be no fiscal impact in FY 93/94. Some costs associated with the operation and maintenance of equipment could be expected in future years, but the equipment will have numerous applications beyond the grant -initiated program. Programs and services introduced during the grant year will be labor- intensive in the design and implementation stages. Maintenance of these programs and services for the future, which will attempt to include the recruitment of volunteer assistance, will not require as great a commitment of staff resources after the initial year. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of the grant and expansion of the vehicle fleet to include the addition of a new van to be purchased with grant funds. Respectfully UO �bmiigt._teed, Appro d by, �:7_:—_ /, - 4 �, I Sp cer Watts Elmer C. Hodge Library Director County Administrator Action Vote No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by Bob L. Johnson Eddy x Denied ( ) motion to accept grant Johnson x Received ( ) Kohinke x Referred Nickens x to Minnix x cc: File Spencer Watts, Library Diane Hyatt, Director, Reta Busher, Director, Director Finance Management & Budget 10 r H. Project priority - Of Title I proposals submitted, this one has a priority of: 1. Of Title III proposals submitted, this one has a priority of: I. Calendar - Use 1993-1994 LSCA Subgrant Calendar as format. Insert project calendar immediately following page 11. J. Letters of agreements and support - Include applicant library director and all cooperating libraries. Attach letters immediately following calendar. K. Budget - Will funding other than the LSCA be used to support this project? YES X NO If yes, provide that portion of budget in the "local" column. Round off all figures. Local LSCA Total (cash or in-kind) Request 1. Personnel salary $ 3,735 S 9,226 $12,961 2. Personnel benefits 564 706 (Exclude retirement) 3. Travel (gasoline & vehicle maintenance) 100 x 22 = 2,200 # trips # miles total miles 2,200 x = 528 miles $.24 budget 528 1,270 528 Reason for travel: this amount covers anticipated gasoline and maintenance expenses to visit a variety of sites in a geographically diverse county. 4. Library materials 7,125 4,000 11,125 Books $3,750 Large print books & magazines for deposit Bye 4,875 Books on cassette tape for deposit Other 2,500 Specify: Bi-Folkal Kits 5. Equipment SEE NEST PAGE FOR DETAILS 6. Supplies 615 Specify: transport boxes, processing supplies 7. Contractual Specify 8. Other promotion & 100 Specify: training TOTALS S 12,139 E 17,616 100 400 $ 32,576 17,616 715 500 S 44,715 BUDGET DETAILS 5. Equipment: * Van Portable barcode trakker Slide projector Mobile displayers Hand truck TOTAL �e91,{i �1.5 $13,921 2.500 595 500 100 $17,616 * The inclusion of a van in this proposal is crucial to its success. The Library has one 12 year old van which is used daily to provide delivery service between 7 libraries in the Roanoke Valley. In order to attain the goals of Project SOARING and to assure its continuance beyond the funding year, adequate, consistently available transportation is necessary. 9a VOTE CORRECTED 7/1/93 ACTION NO. A-62293-7 ITEM NUMBER ✓" =,A AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 22, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Appropriation for Unavoidable Expenditures in the Solid Waste Department COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: I regret that it is necessary to bring this adjustment to you. However, the expenses were unavoidable due to storm related damage and the result of the aging fleet. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: During the FY1992-93 fiscal year the Solid Waste Department incurred expenditures in several budget categories that were beyond management's control. On Friday, June 4, 1993, high winds and heavy rain hit the Valley causing widespread power outages and blocked roads due to downed trees. The National Weather Service clocked winds at 72 miles per hour. There was no damage to County buildings. The major cost to the County came in the form of extra refuse pickup due to trees, limbs and brush. The cost to the Solid Waste Department estimated thru June 26, 1993, are as follows: Truck rental - 2 trucks for 1 month $12,400 Contractual Services - Brush Pick -Up 5,350 Overtime (29 Employees x 3 weeks) 21,088 Part Time (12 Employees x 3 weeks) 6,944 Tipping Fees (220,000 lbs/2,000 x $20/ton x 3 weeks) 6,600 52 382 In addition, the age of the f leet and the need to keep the trucks on the road, has caused the department to overrun the Vehicle Maintenance budget by $104,567. A direct result of vehicles being out of service is the need for other vehicles and crews to pick-up the routes left uncollected by the out of service vehicle. The result is an overtime budget overrun of $50,396. Finally, due to unusual weather conditions throughout this year, the tipping fee budget has also been exceeded by $15,951. FISCAL IMPACT• The total unavoidable expenditures that could not be absorbed in the Solid Waste Department budget is $223,296. This amount could be appropriated from the General Fund Unappropriated Fund Balance. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the appropriation of $223,296 from the General Fund Unappropriated Fund Balance to be allocated among the various budget categories identified above in the Solid Waste Department. Respectfully submitted, Apprr wed by, CfIFN,.✓ Reta R. Busher, Director Elmer C. Hodge Management and Budget County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: Edward G. Kohinke Substitute Motion to approve $223,296 full appropriation cc: File Reta Busher, Director, Management Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Gardner Smith, Director, General VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy x Johnson x Kohinke x Minnix x Nickens x & Budget Services AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 22, 1993 ORDINANCE 62293-8 AUTHORIZING DONATION OF 0.16462 ACRE OF LAND, TOGETHER WITH A PERMANENT DRAINAGE EASEMENT AND A TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT, TO THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA FOR IMPROVEMENT OF VALLEY FORGE AVENUE AND BUNKER HILL DRIVE WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) has undertaken a project for the improvement of Valley Forge Avenue -and Bunker Hill Drive; and, WHEREAS, VDOT requires 0.16462 acre of land in fee simple for the right-of-way, 0.03458 acre of land for a permanent drainage easement, and 0.06074 acre of land for a temporary construction easement, all as shown on Sheets 1-B, 3, and 4 of the project plans; and, WHEREAS, the proposed improvements will serve the interests of the public and will address certain public health and safety concerns. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance. A first reading of this ordinance was held on June 8, 1993; and a second reading was held on June 22, 1993; and, 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the interests in real estate to be conveyed are hereby declared to be surplus, and are hereby made available for other public uses by conveyance to the Commonwealth of Virginia for improvements to Valley Forge Avenue and Bunker Hill Drive in the County of Roanoke, Virginia. 3. That donation of 0.16462 acre of land in fee simple for the right-of-way, 0.03458 acre of land for a permanent drainage easement, and 0.06074 acre of land for a temporary construction easement, all as shown on Sheets 1-B, 3, and 4 of the project plans, to the Commonwealth of Virginia is hereby authorized. 4. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such further actions as may be necessary to accomplish this conveyance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 5. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment ACTION NO. A-62293-9 ITEM NUMBER S AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 22, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Appointment of the Social Services Advisory Board COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: T� BACKGROUND: The Board of Supervisors at its January 26, 1993 meeting accepted the recommendation from the Social Services Board to allow the Roanoke County Department of Social Services to become a jurisdiction -wide (locally administered) agency. This change would enable Roanoke County to administer the classification, compensation and personnel plan for the employees of the Department of Social Services so that these employees would be treated equitably in accordance with other County employees. A further change would be that the Administrative Board would become an Advisory Board as described in section 63.1 of the Code of Virginia which would allow broader representation including a representative from the City of Salem. The responsibility for the Local Board (Administrative matters) are vested in the Director of Social Services as provided in section 63.1-43.1 of the Code of Virginia. The Director reports to the County Administrator like all other Department Heads and would receive input from the Advisory Board on policy and program matters. It is suggested that the Advisory Board be comprised of at least seven members, one representing each magisterial district, one liaison representative from the Board of Supervisors and a representative from the City of Salem. The County Department of Social Services provides service to the City of Salem under a contractual agreement and to date, the City of Salem has had no direct input into the administrative matters. The City of Salem has already been requested to appoint their representative to this Advisory Board. The members of the indicated a willingness to Board. These members ay Magisterial District, whose Anthony from the Windsor F expires July 19, 1996; and H Board of Supervisors, whose previous Administrative Board have continue to serve on the new Advisory e Robert H. Lewis from the Vinton term expires January 1, 1996; Betty Jo .ills Magisterial District whose term irry Nickens as representative from the term expires January 1, 1994. The Local Board Member Handbook from the State Department of Social Services list the following duties and powers of Advisory Boards: monitor local social welfare programs; meet with the local department director at least quarterly; prepare an annual report (plus any other appropriate reports) to the governing body; display interest in all matters pertinent to local social services; (see section 63.1-43.1 of the Code of Virginia); act as an advisor to the local director. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no change in the funding methods of the Commonwealth of Virginia as a result of this change. RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors appoint one member to the Social Services Advisory Board from each Magisterial District and a liaison representative from the Board of Supervisors. It is suggested that the Advisory Board be appointed by the end of July so that they may be trained and be prepared to meet in September, 1993. Respectfully submitted, App r ed by Dr. Bett R. McCrary Elmer C. Hodge Director of Social Serv3 es County Administrator -------------------- ---------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Lee B. Eddy Motion No Yes Abs Denied ( ) to approve establishment of Eddy x Received ( ) Advisory Board Johnson x Referred ( ) Kohinke x To ( ) Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Dr. Betty McCrary, Director, Social Services Social Services File AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 22, 1993 RESOLUTION 62293-10 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM K - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. that the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for June 22, 1993, designated as Item K - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 6, inclusive, as follows: 1. Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the Clean Valley Council. 2. Acknowledge of Acceptance of 0.29 Miles of Rome Drive, and 0.06 Miles of McIntosh Lane into Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 3. Authorization to Pay Certain Legal Fees Regarding Grumman Emergency Products. 4. Resolution of Support for the AMTRAK Route from New York to Atlanta via Southwest Virginia and Eastern Tennessee. 5. Request for Acceptance of a Grant for Drug Enforcement Program. 6. Request for Acceptance of Local Government Challenge Grant from the Virginia Commission for Arts. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution with Item 2 removed, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None On motion of Supervisor Nickens to approve Item 2, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney John H. Cease, Chief of Police Reta R. Busher, Director, Management & Budget A -62293-10.a ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 22, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the Clean Valley Council COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The following nomination was made at the June 8, 1993 meeting. 1. Clean Valley Council Supervisor Nickens nominated Vince Reynolds to another two- year term which will expire June 30, 1995. RECOMMENDATION• It is recommended that the above appointment be confirmed by the Board of Supervisors. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, Mary H. Allen Elmer C. Hodge Clerk County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy X Received ( ) Johnson X Referred ( ) Kohinke X To ( ) Minnix X Nickens X cc: File Clean Valley Council File A -62293-10.b ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 22, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Acknowledgement of Acceptance of 0.29 Miles of Rome Drive and 0.06 Miles of McIntosh Lane into the Secondary System by the Virginia Department of Transportation COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Roanoke County has received acknowledgement that the following roads have been accepted into the Secondary System by the Virginia Department of Transportation effective June 1, 1993. The Orchards, Applewood. Section 7 0.29 Miles of Rome Drive (Route 1226) 0.06 Miles of McIntosh Lane (Route 1089) SUBMITTED BY: Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: �1— Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Harry r Ni-kanrs No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy x Received ( ) Kohinke x Referred ( ) Johnson x To ( ) Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections I 1 r COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1401 EAST BROAD STREET RAY D. PETHTEL RICHMOND, 23219 COMMISSIONER June 9, 1993 Secondary System Additions Roanoke County Board of Supervisors County of Roanoke P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 MEMBERS OF THE BOARD: co aNk44eti, K-;L."t As requested in your resolution dated April 13, 1993, the following additions to the Secondary System of Roanoke County are hereby approved, effective June 1, 1993. ADDITIONS THE ORCHARDS, APPLEWOOD, SECTION 7 Route 1226 (kome Drive) - From Route 781 to Route 1220 Route 1089 (McIntosh Lane) - From Route 1084 to Route 1226 Sincerely, pal �-? Ray D. Pethtel Commissioner TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY LENGTH 0.29 Mi 0.06 Mi ACTION NO. A -62293-10.c ' 3 ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 22, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Authorization to Pay Certain Legal Fees Grumman Aircraft Company - Firetruck Litigation COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY• The County agreed to share with the Town of Vinton the legal expenses for the litigation with Grumman Emergency Products Inc. over the defective ladder on the aerial fire truck. BACKGROUND• In November of 1991, the Board agreed to join with the Town of Vinton in legal action against Grumman Emergency Products, Inc. and other possible defendants over the defective ladder on the aerial fire truck which the County had jointly funded with the Town. Since this vehicle is titled to the Town of Vinton it was agreed that the Town Attorney should handle this litigation. The fees thus far approved by the Board are as follows: February 11, 1992 $ 1,151.95 March 24, 1992 1,437.59 May 26, 1992 2,363.43 June 23, 1992 1,779.16 September 8, 1992 228.71 September 22, 1992 868.75 October 27, 1992 941.00 December 1, 1992 289.00 December 15, 1992 843.00 February 23, 1993 3,835.00 March 23, 1993 6,648.60 April 4, 1993 480.10 May 25, 1993 1,315.36 Total $22,181.65 1 FISCAL IMPACTS• $751.00 (June 3, 1993 statement) in current fees to be paid from the Potential Litigation Account. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors authorize the payment of this invoice from the Board's Potential Litigation Account. Respectfully submitted, 9"Uj A - ni'LL" C4D Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Approved ( x) Motion by Rprry r- N; rkan- Eddy Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) Kohinke Referred Nickens to Minnix File cc: Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Paul Mahoney, County Attorney c;\wp51 \agenda\generaKkgaL(ee Vote No Yes Abs x x x x x TO TOWN OF VINTON P. 0. BOX 338 VINTON, VIRGINIA 24179 PHONE 1703► 983-0608 FAX (703) 983-0621 June 10, 1993 Joe Obenchain, Senior Assistant County Attorney County of Roanoke POB 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 K_3 JOAN B. FURBISH FINANCE DIRECTOR/TREASURER STATEMENT Statement From :Natkin, IIeslep, Siegel and Natkin, PC For Professional Services Rendered Regarding Litigation With Grumman Aircraft Company June 3, 1993 Statement -- $1,502.00 Fifty Percent (50%) Due From Roanoke County To Town of Vinton $751.00 Statement From Natkin, Heslep, Siegel and Natkin, PC For Professional Services Rendered Regarding Litigation With Grumman Aircraft Company May 4, 1993 Statement -- $2,630.72 Fifty Percent (50%) Due From Roanoke County To 315.36 Town of Vinton DUE UPON RECEIPT $2,066.36 MAKE CHECK PAYABLE TO: TOWN OF VINTON cc: Diane D. Hyatt AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 221 1993 RESOLUTION 62293-10.d URGING THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS TO SUPPORT THE EXTENSION OF AMTRAK RAIL SERVICE BETWEEN NEW YORK AND ATLANTA VIA THE ROANOKE VALLEY WHEREAS, the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK) has recently completed an internal study of proposed new rail routes, including a new line from New York to Atlanta by way of Roanoke, Bristol, Knoxville, and Chattanooga. WHEREAS, the proposed new route would connect major northeast cities with Atlanta through the western Virginia cities of Charlottesville, Lynchburg, Roanoke, and Bristol, as well as the eastern Tennessee cities of Bristol, Knoxville, and Chattanooga; and WHEREAS, such new line would serve as a logical expansion of AMTRAK's national network and would link major population centers in western Virginia and eastern Tennessee with New York and Atlanta; and WHEREAS, because of declining air and bus service to many of these cities, the new AMTRAK route would provide badly needed transportation access and act as a catalyst to development of local economies; and WHEREAS, passenger rail service to the Roanoke Valley would provide additional support and increased visibility to local economic development projects and other attractions and businesses in the Roanoke Valley as well as in the entire region of southwest Virginia and northeast Tennessee. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board endorses the proposal to extend AMTRAK service between New York and Atlanta via Southwest Virginia and Eastern Tennessee. 2. That the Board urges the United States Congress to support the expansion of AMTRAK service to the Roanoke Valley as a part of the proposed New York -Atlanta Route. 3. That a copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Roanoke Valley legislators in the General Assembly and the Roanoke Valley representatives in the United States Congress by the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Mary F. Parker, Clerk, Roanoke City Council The Honorable J. Brandon Bell, Virginia Senate The Honorable Malfourd W. "Bo" Trumbo, Virginia Senate The Honorable G. Steven Agee, Virginia House of Delegates The Honorable C. Richard Cranwell, Virginia House of Delegates The Honorable Clifton A. Woodrum, Virginia House of Delegates The Honorable A. Victor Thomas, Virginia House of Delegates The Honorable John Warner, U. S. Senate The Honorable Charles S. Robb, U. S. Senate The Honorable Bob Goodlatte, U. S. House of Representatives The Honorable Rick Boucher, U. S. House of Representatives The Honorable Jerry Allen Wolfe, Mayor, City of Bristol, VA The Honorable John S. Gaines, Mayor, City of Bristol, Tenn ACTION NO. A -62293-10.e I ITEM NUMBER 5- AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 22, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Acceptance of a Grant by the County Police Department for a Drug Enforcement Program COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: The Criminal Investigations Division of the Roanoke County Police Department has been notified by the Department of Criminal Justice Services that it has been awarded a grant renewal in the amount of $17,185.00 for the purpose of enhancing the investigation and prosecution of persons who use Roanoke County motels as a temporary location to distribute drugs. The monies will be used to pay officers to work overtime and to pay informants and purchase drugs. Since this enforcement program is conducted during the officers' off duty time, the current level of law enforcement in the County will not be negatively affected. FISCAL IMPACT• The grant is for $17,185.00 in DCJS federal funds (75%) and $5,728.00 in local funds. The local funds will be provided from seized monies from a DEA Task Force operation and will not require any additional allocation from the County budget. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends acceptance of the grant from the Department of Criminal Justice Services. Respectfullv submitted, ,Jdhn H. Cease Chief of Police Approved (x ) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Approved by, i Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION Motion by: Harry C. Nickens cc: File John Cease, Chief of Police VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy x Johnson x Kohinke x Minnix x Nickens x ACTION NO. A -62293-10.f K ITEM NUMBER K AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 22, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Acceptance of the Local Government Challenge Grant from the Virginia Commission for the Arts. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: liJ'liJ,4 SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Roanoke County applied for a Local Government Challenge Grant from the Virginia Commission for the Arts. The Commission will match up to $5,000, any donation the County makes to qualified art organizations in the valley. In the FY 1993-94 Budget, The Board of Supervisors approved an appropriation of $3,000 for the Arts Council of the Blue Ridge and $5,000 for the Roanoke Symphony Orchestra. Staff therefore, applied for the maximum grant allocation of $5,000. Roanoke County was awarded $2,230 for FY 1993-94. This amount is less than the maximum due to the budget cuts suffered by State agencies in the 1992-94 biennium. FISCAL IMPACT: Staff recommends dividing the $2,230 grant evenly between the Arts Council of the Blue Ridge and the Roanoke Symphony Orchestra. Combined with the County's appropriation, the following amounts would be available to the organizations referred to above: County VCA Organization Appropriation Grant Total Arts Council $ 3,000 $ 1,115 $ 4,115 Roanoke Symphony 5,000 _1,115 6,115 $ 8,000 $2,230 $10,230 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of the Local Government Challenge Grant from the Virginia Commission for the Arts in the amount of $2,230 to be distributed as indicated above. Respectfully submitted, Reta R. Busher Director, Management and Budget Approved by, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens No Yes Abs Denied () Eddy _ x _ Received () Johnson _ x _ Referred () Kohinke To () Minnix _ x _ Nickens x cc: File Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 22, 1993 RESOLUTION 62293-11 CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Certification Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Executive Session AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 22, 1993 ORDINANCE 62293-12 AMENDING AND REENACTING ORDINANCE 82592-12, THE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR ROANOKE COUNTY, BY THE ADOPTION OF CERTAIN MINOR AMENDMENTS TO SAID ORDINANCE WHEREAS, on August 25, 1992, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted Ordinance 82592-12 which enacted a new zoning ordinance for Roanoke County; and, WHEREAS, since the adoption of the new zoning ordinance the need for the adoption of several minor, technical amendments has been identified; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission for Roanoke County held its public hearing on this amendment on June 1, 1993, and has recommended approval of the ordinance adopting these amendments to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia; and, WHEREAS, in the interest of public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice, the Board of Supervisors hereby amends certain provisions of the Zoning Ordinance for Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law, and that the first reading of this ordinance was held on June 8, 1993, and the second reading and public hearing was held on June 22, 1993. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the Zoning Ordinance for Roanoke County, adopted on August 25, 1992, be, and hereby is amended and reenacted, as follows: 1. That the provisions of Section 30-23-2, Non -conforming uses, be amended 1 to exempt minor additions and expansions from the special use permit requirement in certain instances as follows: Sec. 30-23-2 Nonconforming Uses of Buildings, Structures or Land (Page 18) (F) Any legally established use which existed prior to the adoption of this ordinance, or .............. ... . ..................... t ....... ........... ....O...M.. ................ MOM. M. ... ...A.... .. .........M..: . ...... ..... X: ....... ......... .'66 -5, M.O. 6 -CM . i .. 6 0!" ............ I.ij.. ... ............... -X .......... .. . . ........... 2. That Section 30-29-5, Commercial Use Types, be amended by the revision of the use type description for Bed and Breakfast as follows: 2 Sec. 30-29-5 Commercial Use Types (Page 40) BED AND BREAKFAST - ° ~ ewaef eeeupied dwelling in which not more than 5 bedrooms are provided for overnight guests for compensation, on daily or weekly basis, with or without meals. 3. That Section 30-41-2, Permitted uses, be amended to allow Bed and Breakfast in R-1, Low Density Residential Districts, as follows: SEC. 3041 R-1 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Section 30-41-2 (B) 3R>><' ..<:.:; ............................... .::::::.... .............................................................................................. 4. That the following minor revisions are made to the provisions of Section 30- 82-3, Home Occupations: Sec. 30-82-3 Home Occupations, Type I and Type II (Page 120 & 121) (B) General standards: 3. There shall be no outside storage of goods, products, equipment, or other materials . associated with the home occupation. No toxic, explosive, flammable, radioactive, or other hazardous materials used in conjunction 3 with the home occupation shall be used, sold, or stored on the site. # (D) Additions standards for all Type II home occupations: S. That the following revision is made to the design requirements set out in Section 30-82-6, Manufactured Home, Class A is proposed: Sec. 30-82-6 Manufactured Home, Class A (Page 124) (B) General standards: 3. The manufactured home shall have a minimum width of 2319. feet. 6. That the following additions are made to the Use and Design Standards for Cemeteries to exempt family and church cemeteries. Sec. 30-83-1 Cemetery (Page 138) (A) General standards: 1. Minimum parcel size: 10 acres. .19 2. No interment shall occur within 25 feet of the property line. ..::.::.;.::::::..:..::.:::::.::::::::..:::::.::::::::.::::::...:::.:::::::.:::::::::::::::.:..::::::::.:.::::.::::::.:. �'`>:-,l..V t ::>:: ated::> :::::>: ' ::>. :::>:re c »:arse b .::::: or_::::th ::::: :::::::::........_::::::::::::._::::::::::P::::::.:.:::::._:::::::::::::::::::::::......::......:::....:::. .............. jove ::Y :' : :,: ...:R.,. ..:�..............:.... *.... ......... ........ :i h . .;.:...........:...: ,:,." ..... .I .... .... .::.......::. : ................................... .... �. ge�eter is I©sated at feast feet fi puh�c FropecYntun i'.i:...:i:\.i:.:::::::.::.:::L.i:.:}'i::i:.i'.:,:.i:.i:.i:::�'''i }:..:. .i:};i::.:;i:.i:.i:;i:. '':.R::'•::i'.::.ii::.::.:::.;::.:j.:::?.i:!.i:.i:.:, .ii'..j vs�d m aanneet€o.nti pul;. tr s�Pg: .:.:: ' .... ...........,...:..:...:................:...::.:::.:....w....;,.......:;:G: :::i: ...: ...::.::...: ..,....r....: .. x................... d :«: o '.::::>::o::;:-he:::aan ::.......:::p.::::::::::::::::.:::::::.:::::::::.:._:::::::::.8 to sM CO.::.:::.;:::.:::::................:::::::::.......:::::.::::::.:::::::........:::::::. , aIcxt s>c ten 7. That the provisions in Section 30-92, Screening„ Landscaping & Buffer Yards be amended as follows: Sec. 30-92-3 Standards and Specifications (Page 186-188) 5 (C) Where landscaping is required by this ordinance, the following shall apply: 6. Required small deciduous shall be species suitable for planting and growth within a built -environment. Acceptable species shall include dogwoods, bradford pears, and other dwarf varieties. These trees shall have an ultimate iiheight of 15 feet at maturity. One tree shall be planted for each 15 .............. ............... ............... .................... ...... feet of buffer yard Sec. 30-924 Applicability of Regulations (C) New parking areas shall include landscaped medians, peninsulas or planter islands in accordance with the Table below. Such areas shall be planned, designed and located to channel traffic, facilitate stonnwater management, and define and separate parking areas and aisles. Each landscaped area shall be planted with small X deciduous trees with a minimum caliper of one inch at the time of planting:::jnj':';' .. ...... 8. That the number of districts which allow Day Care Centers by special use permit be expanded so as to coincide with districts which also allow places of religious assembly as follows: SEC. 30-32 AG -3 AGRICULTURAL/RURAL PRESERVE DISTRICT 0 Section 30-32-2 (B) 2.fi (Page 48) SEC. 30-33 AG -1 AGRICULTURAL,/RURAL LOW DENSITY DISTRICT Section 30-33-2 (B) 2. r (Page 51) SEC. 30-41 R-1 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Section 30-41-2 (B) 3. << (Page 61) 9. That the following sections be amended by the addition of the permitted use, Cultural Services (Libraries and Museums), by special use permit: SEC. 30-45 R-3 MEDIUM DENSITY MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Section 30-45-2 (B) 2. (Page 67) SEC. 30-46 R-4 HIGH DENSITY MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Section 30-46-2 (B) 2.tiljr (Page 70) 10. That the following sections be amended, as indicated below, using the adopted setback requirement, to clarify definitively the setback requirement for accessory structures: SEC. 30-32 AG -3 AGRICULTURAL,/RURAL PRESERVE DISTRICT rA Sec. 30-32-3 Site Development Regulations (B) Minimum setback requirements 1. Front yard: 50 feet SEC. 30-33 AG -1 AGRICULTURAL,/RURAL LOW DENSITY DISTRICT Sec. 30-33-3 Site Development Regulations (B) Minimum setback requirements 1. Front yard: 30 feet .........:::::.:::;;;:.;:.;:.;;:.;:.;::.;;;;>;;;:.;;:.;;:.;:.;;;;:.;:.;;:;::.::;;:;.;;;;:.;: SEC. 30-34 AR AGRICULTURAI,/RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Sec. 30-34-3 Site Development Regulations (B) Minimum setback requirements 1. Front yard: 30 feet SEC. 30-36 AV VILLAGE CENTER DISTRICT Sec. 30-36-3 Site Development Regulations (B) Minimum setback requirements 1. Front yard: 3 -5 -feet stxtcst:... 3 ..t b. srtcrest besl€g iizx. SEC. 30-41 R-1 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Sec. 30-41-3 Site Development Regulations (B) Minimum setback requirements 1. Front yard: 30 feet SEC. 30-42 R-2 MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Sec. 30-42-3 Site Development Regulations 6 (B) Minimum setback requirements 1. Front yard: 30 feet F : stEL es::::::;+e }i:i•. iiFii}i: ;::' ::•::::::. .: iiX ".:;:.i}}:?R.:: •R4:^iiii:..:.:.::::.::: ::',...," .; v::i::::^::n:r.iiiii}}}i::^i' :F4i}?i}i'i:•ibiii}i}i::(};. .. Azces ;:stf€€re:::eiz::::::t1n Se. SEC. 30-45 R-3 MEDIUM DENSITY MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Sec. 30-45-3 Site Development Regulations (B) Minimum setback requirements 1. Front yard: 30 deet . R &... cx structures: feet; Accessary stru+etu�, bed can bldg e SEC. 30-46 R-4 HIGH DENSITY MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Sec. 30-46-3 Site Development Regulations (B) Minimum setback requirements 1. Front yard: 30 feet .::::.:............:...:sures>> �: :;:::.::.::.:.::.::..::.::..:..... :::;.::::.:;;:.:;.::.;:.:;.:..:.:...:.::::::: .::bt R =. fie. 10 SEC. 30-53 C-1 OFFICE DISTRICT Sec. 30-53-3 Site Development Regulations (B) Minimum setback requirements 1. Front yard: NC District g ,es..:.30 feet or 20 feet when all parking is located behind the front building line. a:<SrarcrS*;::»bei:>ro:::b'da e SEC. 30-54 C-2 GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT Sec. 30-543 Site Development Regulations (B) Minimum setback requirements 1. Front yard: p30 feet or 20 feet when all parking is located behind the front building line. :.i:.i;;sic;res::::;�ea;�d.��.3r:.�>b'�. � :>��i�► 11. That the citation on page v. of the Table of contents and on page 113 should be changed as follows to correct a typographical error. SEC. 30-745 ... 30-79 (RESERVED) 11 r NC District 12. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ��G2�-cam -;V. Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 12 ORDINANCE 62293-12 AMENDING AND REENACTING ORDINANCE 82592-12 - APPENDIX A OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Circuit Court C. O. Clemens, Judge Kenneth Trabue, Judge Steven A. McGraw, Clerk Family Court Services Joseph M. Clark, II, Judge Philip Trompeter, Judge Peggy H. Gray, Clerk Intake Counsellor General District Court John L. Apostolou, Judge George Harris, Judge Theresa A. Childress, Clerk Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff Magistrates Sherri Krantz/Betty Peery John H. Cease, Police Chief John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance O. Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Kenneth L. Hogan, Chief Animal Control Officer Thomas C. Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue Gardner W. Smith„ Director, General Services Director, Parks & Recreation Elaine Carver, Director, Procurement John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Michael Lazzuri, Court Services Clifford D. Craig, Director, Utility Main Library Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke 24016 Roanoke County Code Book AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 22, 1993 ORDINANCE 62293-13 AMENDING AND REENACTING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAPS FOR ROANOKE COUNTY, BY THE ADOPTION OF CERTAIN MISCELLANEOUS CHANGES THROUGHOUT THE COUNTY TO SAID MAPS WHEREAS, on December 15, 1992, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted Ordinance 121592-10 which amended the Zoning District Maps for Roanoke County; and, WHEREAS, citizens in various areas of the County have requested that the zoning classifications as reflected in the new zoning district maps of their properties be re-examined to address their questions and concerns; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 1, 1993, and has made recommendations to the Board; and WHEREAS, public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice require that the following properties and zoning district maps be, and hereby are, submitted to the Board of Supervisors for amendment; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law, and that the first reading of this ordinance was held on June 8, 1993, and the second reading and public hearing was held on June 22, 1993. BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That 111992 Zoning District Maps (Master Set #1) of 1 Roanoke County, Virginia" are hereby amended and reenacted as the zoning district maps for Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: (1) OWNER: William Brown, Jr. LOCATION: Harborwood Road; Catawba District MAP NOS. 65.00-2-17.1 FROM: R-1 TO: AG -3 COMMISSION COMMENTS: The requested AG -3 designation is not inconsistent with the current agricultural/ rural characteristics of the area. (2) OWNER(S): Various LOCATION: Slate Hill Area of Roanoke County; Cave Spring District. (Elmview Road, Chevy Road, Almond Road). MAP NOS.: 77.20-1-42,43,44,45,46,47,48,50,51,52,53; 77.20-2- 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11; 87.08-3- 16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28, 29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41, 42,43,44,45,46,47,48. FROM: C-1 TO: R-3 COMMISSION COMMENTS: This area was zoned C-1 to facilitate long term commercial growth in the Rt. 419/Rt. 220 area. The C-1 zoning created a significant number of non- conforming residences in this area and prohibits new residential construction. Although the area still may be suitable for commercial growth in the future, rezoning to R-3 Residential meets the current needs of the residents. (3) OWNER: Hinman Estate (Dominion Trust) LOCATION: Hollins Road; Hollins District MAP NOS.: 38.16-1-3.1 2 FROM: R-3 and I-1 TO: I-1 COMMISSION COMMENTS: The dual zoning of this property was the result of an error in the preparation of the zoning maps. The approval of this change will correct this error. (4) OWNER(S): Paul L.Roberts Gene and Velma Davis LOCATION: Catawba Valley Drive; Catawba District MAP NOS.: 25.00-1-28,29 FROM: C-2 AND AG -1 TO: AG -1 AND C-2 COMMISSION COMMENTS: The zoning of the two properties was "switched" on the adopted maps. The approval of this change will correct this map error. (5) OWNERS: Various LOCATION: Village Lane; Hollins District MAP NOS.: 27.19-4-48.2,48.3,48.4,48.5,48.6,48.7, 48.8. FROM: R-3 TO: R-1 COMMISSION COMMENTS: The original R-3 parcel was platted and developed as seven single family lots late in 1992. This rezoning will reflect the current land use of these parcels. (6) OWNER: Hobart Properties LOCATION: Starkey Road; Cave Spring District MAP NOS.: 87.19-2-6,7 FROM: C-1 TO: R-3 C COMMISSION COMMENTS: The owner of these lots has requested R-3 zoning. These two lots lie within a Comprehensive Plan Development designation. R-3 zoning is consistent with this plan designation. (7) OWNER: Tara Clay Products Corporation (Old Virginia Brick) LOCATION: Wildwood Road; Catawba District TAB PARCEL(S): FROM: AG -1 44.04-1-13 TO: I-1 COMMISSION COMMENTS: This area is not suitable for general industrial uses. The approval of the I-1 zoning would violate the comprehensive Plan and would not grant the owner the right to expand the quarry by -right. If the owner wishes to propose an expansion of the quarry, the Special Use Permit process is the appropriate method to evaluate the proposed expansion. (8) OWNER: Harold Wingate LOCATION: Catawba Valley Drive; Catawba District TAB PARCEL(S): 13.00-1-1,2,3,4; 14.00-1-12 FROM: AG -3 TO: AR and AG -1 COMMISSION COMMENTS: The property is located within a rural preserve area. No public utilities are available. Residential densities permitted by the AR district would be inconsistent with the character of the area. (9) OWNER: R. L. Moran LOCATION: Creekside Drive; Catawba District TAB PARCEL(S): 66.01-3-19 4 FROM: AR TO: R-1 COMMISSION COMMENTS: The property is located within a rural preserve area. Although public water service to this property is likely feasible after the construction of the Spring Hollow water transmission line, the steep topography and limited access to the property preclude the suitability of higher residential densities allowed by R-1 zoning. (10) OWNER: Merriam Sears LOCATION: Hidden Woods Drive; Windsor Hills District TAX PARCEL(S): 66.00-1-2,7,8 FROM: AG -3 TO: AR COMMISSION COMMENTS: The property is located within a rural preserve area, and is served by public water. The property has a very steep mountainous terrain. The only potential access to the property is Hidden Woods Drive. Due to topography, access from Hidden Woods Drive is problematic. In addition, Hidden Woods Drive is a cul-de-sac that was designed to a lesser street standard. The development of the Sears property at an AR density would result in traffic volumes that exceed the design capacity of Hidden Woods Drive, and are inconsistent with the neighborhood character. 2. That said map or maps are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 3. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance, and 5 carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors CC: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning John Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessments R AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JUNE 22, 1993 ORDINANCE 62293-14 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF TRACTS OF REAL ESTATE TOTALLING 767.33 ACRES LOCATED IN THE EXPLORE PARR IN THE VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF AG -3 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF EPD WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF THE VIRGINIA RECREATIONAL FACILITIES AUTHORITY WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on May 25, 1993, and the second reading and public hearing was held June 22, 1993; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on June 1, 1993; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tracts of real estate totalling 767.33 acres located at the Explore Park in the Vinton Magisterial District is hereby changed from the zoning classification of AG -3, Agricultural/Rural Preserve District, to the zoning classification of EPD, Explore Park District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of The Virginia Recreational Facilities Authority. 3. That pursuant to Section 30-71 of the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance (Explore Park District) all of the written and graphic information prepared and submitted as part of this application shall constitute proffers pursuant to Section 30-15 of EA the Zoning Ordinance. 4. That real estate affected by this request is as follows: Parcel Tax Map Number Acreage 1 71.00-1-3 47.70 2 71.00-1-6 5.93 3 71.00-1-8 2.00 4 71.00-1-12 9.00 5 71.00-1-13 33.05 6 71.03-1-10 24.16 7 71.03-1-11 3.75 8 71.03-1-15 18.78 9 80.00-1-34.2 3.83 10 80.00-1-34.3 0.07 11 80.00-1-35 21.96 12 80.00-2-32 8.67 13 80.00-2-33 23.00 14 80.00-2-34 13.86 15 80.00-2-35 5.00 16 80.00-2-36 0.30 17 80.00-5-24 488.28 18 80.00-5-26 10.00 19 80.00-5-27 18.12 20 80.00-5-29 22.66 21 80.00-5-30 1.00 22 80.00-5-31 2.23 23 80.00-5-32 2.23 24 80.00-5-34 1.75 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: 2 AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Aden, Clerk cc: File Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 3