Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/12/1993 - Adopted Board RecordsACTION NO. A-101293-1 ITEM NUMBER �f AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 12, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Consideration of Alternatives to Fund Road Projects Eliminated by the Reduction of VDOT Revenue Sharing. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Roanoke County has been notified by the Virginia Department of Transportation that our Supplemental Revenue Sharing Match has been reduced from $200,000 to $172,600 for a total allocation including VDOT's match of $345,200. As a result of this reduction, four projects have been eliminated from the Priority List. They are Buckland Mill Road, Drake Circle, Irondale Circle and Bradshaw Road. Buckland Forest Roads: Buckland Mill Road has been in need of repair for several years. The residents in the Buckland Forest area have been meeting with staff for two years to try to upgrade their roads to plant mix and complete the necessary repairs to Buckland Mill Road. They have committed to raising the matching share of funds to improve these roads, and have raised $4,000 of $13,100 needed for their share. They have been advised that their roads have been removed from the revenue sharing priority list and are very disappointed. There are several methods available to complete repair of these roads: 1. The residents could wait and see if there are funds available in this year's incidental construction fund. If these funds are used, it would be late 1994 or early 1995 before construction begins. This method would not require a match from the residents. 2. The residents could continue to raise the funds. Staff believes there will be sufficient savings from the 35 other revenue sharing projects to accomplish these projects. This would require us to wait until the other projects are 15-I completed or are far enough along to determine the savings. If there are insufficient savings from the revenue sharing projects, staff could come back to the Board to request funds for the remaining balance. 4. The area residents could wait until next year's revenue sharing program takes place. Staff will be addressing this with the Board in the spring of 1994. Bradshaw Road Culvert This is a Roanoke Valley Resource Authority problem and could be constructed using Resource Authority Funds. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the residents continue to raise their share of the funds for Buckland Mill Road, Drake Circle, and Irondale Circle. The County would match their share with savings from the other revenue sharing projects. If additional funds are necessary, staff will come back to the Board for consideration at that time. Staff recommends that the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority be encouraged to fund the entire Bradshaw Road culvert project at an approximate cost of $22,000. 6,1-�rx-4 Elmer C. Rddge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson No Yes Abs Denied to approve staff recommendation Eddy X._ Received ( ) Johnson x Referred ( ) Kohinke x To ( ) Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Jeff Echols, Resident Engineer, VDOT John Hubbard, CEO, RVRA COUNTY OF ROANOKE ENGINEERING & INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 772-2080 MEMORANDUM TO: Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator FROM: Arnold Covey, Director of Engineering��� & Inspections SUBJ: Supplemental Revenue Sharing for FY 92-93 DATE: September 23, 1993 Jeff Echols has informed me that Roanoke County's Supplemental Revenue Sharing Match has been reduced from $200,000 to $172,600 for a total allocation including VDOT's match of $345,200. This means that the following projects: (a) Project #4 Franklin Road, the County's contribution of $25,000 is reduced to $22,600. (b) Projects #5, Buckland Mill Road, #6, Drake Circle, #7, Irondale Circle and #8, Bradshaw Road will have to be eliminated from the adopted prioritized list. If you have any questions, please let me know. dj Attachment W=o^ N l y l y l❑ l o l a t❑ I❑ I I I <�Z� -�� LZ�= I Z LZL z LLQ �I opo 1>1 I o > > I > I > Q --�T� W 7,7 I TT 7 T 7 oz ww La OZui um = < I =Z I = uu �� O S m Ir^ iuj s �= I OJi I Jy 'Y I L. Jd -JDCj �Q MV JW J <N a^ �r n'� l7U LO �mW N N N N N N N N O_ Z ;,� W CL W W W W W W 1 N W -1 } } I I }- L Q C I O Roy I Z z z ❑z z Z z C3 u ¢ O tir 4 N N N N N N N r sui D 00 cu co co U) Q W> (L - 1pu cu G W �pTW Z I W z,u u W U ( W a P1 �/l p ❑ F .c p m p L Z W Z W W N1 oel Np N10 NSN nN<in �W �yO �JSJ • • K 1' = t K .r P _ m d 1D T W N 4 h u7 W LL � Z �❑ aKI�W.Z-•.-. Wm�,.. I cx WN�mI W^=�j WW � WN^❑j� UY7UI I I (X 0 6 0: O I U M?n IW ~ W�❑� ��❑�I �WDUI� OF �SpZI�=a❑I Off LLJ 0 Y - Q Q� O C O v f I m i I N N I N I m z QI- ('� Z Q = O WZ CL M n n cv o100 0 0 LLJ ow !� � L6-1 4' I � L 10 L1—J >>\} r I r r I = r I > I r Z V) z < Oji � Z t– z—t Z t—z t 7- I � t- z--� z a� U Z_ N Z Wm W � cu — 4--4 — I— 4 — 4--4 — I-- 4 —I �W/1 z ^ W Q z� o alolol10l0 0 10101 r - OZv I m I N I 10 I I � I J I N 0 U W I I— tY � Cn W QA h10 I Z I a, WW ?� (7 J< (1QI� ZN (N'I ZIn fN'IUm NW1p NiN J op Z� 1010 F~ I NaW 110WW I NZW I mZN I N<W I "Qm I NyW I ❑ CLCe oz =, I ^O� I �yK I ��ORO i ~X� i n10a� i m,4 C, a o<�� i ~ I IC.4 Ir-) I -W I'n n Ico I I I ACTION NO. A-101293-2 ITEM NUMBER _ (J O AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 12, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Request for an amendment to the terms of the contract governing the Roanoke County - Botetourt County Joint Library. COUNTY ADMINISTRATORS COMMENTS: 7f �"" EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The 1986 contract which established the Roanoke County - Botetourt County Joint Library contains provisions for the allocation of continuing operations costs between the two localities. The original terms of the contract call for a decennial review of the allocation of costs following each census. Costs are to be apportioned based on facility usage or size of service area. The Botetourt County Board of Supervisors, acting on an earlier recommendation made by the Joint Library Committee, has voted in favor of conducting a usage study in FY 1995-1996 instead of waiting until FY 2000-2001. The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors, if it agrees with the Botetourt County action, needs to formally endorse the change in the terms of the original contract. Any resultant recommended cost adjustments would be subject to the approval of the respective governing bodies. BACKGROUND: The original terms of the Joint Library contract established a 50% cost sharing arrangement between the two localities. Section Three of the contract provides for regular adjustments of the operating cost allocations based primarily on the usage levels of the joint facility by the citizens of the respective localities. Original terms of the contract mandated an adjustment review following every Federal Census of the population. Although size of the service area is also mentioned as a possible cost allocation factor, in practice this has not been used. It appears that designation of the decennial review was principally a matter of convenience. The original 50% division of costs was adjusted in FY 92/93 to a 25% share for Roanoke County based on usage studies conducted in 1990 and 1991. The Joint Library Committee, which by contract is charged with collecting and analyzing cost allocation data and recommending adjustments, also recommended that the process be repeated in 1995/1996. It was felt that ten years is a long period to be locked into an allocation 2 agreement based on a relatively short period's survey data, and that a five year period would result in a fairer and more accurate assessment process. It is perhaps noteworthy that the newly established Chesterfield County -Richmond City joint library relies on annually collected usage data to formulate cost allocations each year. FISCAL IMPACT: Increased frequency of cost allocation review could possibly lead to an accelerated increase in Roanoke County's financial obligation to support the Joint Library. As an example, if usage levels by Roanoke County residents were to rise by an increment of 5% to a proportion of 30%, our current year's funding obligation would rise from $30,724 to $36,869. By the same token, a decline of 5% would save the County approximately $6,145 per year. The library staff, at this time, thinks that it is highly unlikely that the usage rates would change by more than 5% in either direction. The library staff also believes that given the current growth rates of Botetourt's population within the Joint Library's service area, and the prevailing commuter patterns within the Roanoke County sections of the service area, it is probable that Roanoke County's citizens' proportionate usage would either remain stable or decrease. ALTERNATIVES: 1) Leave the current contract agreement intact, which preserves the County's obligation at 25% until after the year 2000; risk of possibly higher costs is avoided, but so is the possibility of lower costs. 2) Request more frequent (ie., annual or biennial) assessments of usage and adjustment of costs. 3) Act to revoke or substantially rewrite the contract. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Library staff recommend that the Board agree to allow the Joint Library Committee to conduct a usage study and to propose suggested cost allocations in FY 95/96. The Board of Trustees has reviewed this suggestion and also supports this course. The Board of Supervisors would remain free to accept or reject the Joint Library Committee's suggestions. Respectfully submitted, Spe cer Watts Library Director Approved Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) Approved by ?, /� Elm r C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE Motion by: Bob L. Johnson No to approve staff recommendation Eddy _ Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens cc. File Spencer Watts, D4_--Pctor. , Library Yes Abs X X X X X ACTION NO. A -10T1293-3 ITEM NO. .1/ " 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 12, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Request to Approve an Amendment to the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Contract COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: r This amendment would reduce the number of passenger enplane- ment surveys from six (6) per year to two (2) per year. BACKGROUND: Section 15(b) of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Contract provides that the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission shall conduct six surveys per fiscal year to determine the number of County passengers enplaning at the Airport. The contract provides that the County shall make certain payments to the Commission based upon certain airport services and facilities being provided to County residents. These surveys are used to determine the number of County residents receiving such services. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The airport commission staff believes that semi-annual surveys would be more than sufficient for determining the number of County passengers using the airport. As Jacqueline L. Shuck stated in her letter of September 24, 1993, "Historically, the number of County passengers far exceeds the minimum required to support the County's $264,640 annual payment. In fact, use by County residents or businesses has substantially exceeded the minimum percentage of approximately 1.76% in every one of the thirty-seven surveys conducted thus far." Attached for Board consideration is the letter from Ms. Shuck and the draft amendment. FISCAL IMPACTS• Each survey costs approximately $600.00 to perform. This amendment would eliminate 4 surveys annually, saving approximately $2400 per year. D-3 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board approve the proposed amendment and authorize the County Administrator to execute the First Amendment to the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Contract on behalf of the County. Respectfully submitted, Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney Action Vote No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by Harry C. Nickens Denied ( ) to approve staff recnmmendati_nn Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred Kohinke x to Nickens x Minnix x generaVairporuep cc: File Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Jacqueline L. Shuck, Executive Director, Roanoke Regional Airport Mary F. Parker, Clerk, Roanoke City Council 5202 Aviation Drive :. r Airport Commission �Roanoke, Virginia 24012-1148 Bob L. Johnson, Chairman (703) 362-1999 Kit B, Kiser, Vice Chairman FAX (703) 563-4838 W, Robert Herbert H. Odell Minnix Jacqueline L. Shuck, Executive Director September 24, 1993 Mr. Elmer Hodge, County Administration County of Roanoke P.O. Box 29800 Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798 Mr. W. Robert Herbert, City Manager Room 364, Roanoke Municipal Building 215 Church Avenue, S.W. Roanoke, Virginia 24011 Dear Elmer and Bob: In response to Elmer's letter of August 27, 1993, please be advised that the bimonthly passenger enplanement survey is conducted in accordance with Section 15 (b) of the contract between the City, County and Commission. Although the contract specifies that there shall be six surveys per year, members of my staff feel that quarterly surveys are all that we need for our market information and that semi-annual surveys would be more than sufficient for determining the number of County passengers using the airport. Historically, the number of County passengers far exceeds the minimum required to support the County's $264,640 annual payment. In fact, use by County residents or businesses has substantially exceeded the minimum percentage of approximately 1.76% in every one of the thirty-seven surveys conducted thus far. Since each survey costs us approximately $600.00 to perform, I think it would be beneficial to the Commission if the agreement were amended to reduce the number of enplanement surveys conducted each year. I have taken the liberty of having a draft prepared of a possible amendment. Please let me know whether City Council and the County Board of Supervisors are interested in pursuing this, and whether the amendment, as drafted, is acceptable. Very truly yours, J9aqueline L Executive Director JLS:csp Enclosure cc: Commission Members cspO92493.h jls\survey AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 12, 1993 RESOLUTION 101293-4 FOR APPROVAL OF COUNTY - STATE AGREEMENT FOR INDUSTRIAL ACCESS RELATING TO VALLEY TECHPARR WHEREAS, Title 33.1-221, Code of Virginia, provides for the availability of state industrial access funds for implementing approved improvements to public streets to enhance and promote industrial development and continued public safety along public streets; and WHEREAS, Roanoke County is desirous of developing Valley Techpark for the purpose of job creation for the citizens of both the Roanoke and New River Valleys; and WHEREAS, the citizens approved the November 1992 bond referendum of which $750,000 was earmarked for the development of Valley TechPark; and WHEREAS, the Commonwealth Transportation Board approved $450,00 for the purpose of constructing an industrial access road at Valley TechPark; and WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) will cause to construct an industrial road of .38 miles in length; and Whereas, Roanoke County agrees to reimburse VDOT for expenses over $450,000; and WHEREAS, Roanoke County agrees to the contingencies outlined in the County -State Agreement for Valley TechPark and referred to as Project 0830-080-294,M501 by VDOT. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors does hereby recommend that Roanoke County enter into the County -State Agreement for Valley TechPark and authorizes the Appropriate County officials to sign said agreement. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Timothy W. Gubala, Director, Economic Development Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Virginia Department of Transportation Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 12, 1993 RESOLUTION 101293-5 SUPPORTING DELEGATE CRANWELL'S EFFORTS FOR REGIONALIZATION OF WATER, SEWER, SOLID WASTE, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND TOURISM WHEREAS, recent polls in the City of Roanoke and Roanoke County clearly reflect the desire of City and County residents to merge various services; and WHEREAS, on September 21, 1993, Delegate Richard Cranwell convened a meeting of area elected officials and business leaders to discuss regionalization of water, sewer, solid waste, economic development and tourism marketing; and WHEREAS, Delegate Richard Cranwell, at that meeting, offered to lead a legislative effort to obtain state funds which would be used to support regionalization and/or as incentives; and WHEREAS, these efforts by Delegate Cranwell and other members of the Legislature are appreciated by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, supports Delegate Cranwell's proposal to initiate legislation that will provide financial incentives to local governments for regionalization of various services; and FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County respectively requests all local governing bodies to support this legislative initiative as being in the best interest of the entire region. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the resolution and include in the legislative package, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: %w Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File The Honorable C. Richard Cranwell, Virginia House of Delegates Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Timothy W. Gubala, Director, Economic Development Roanoke Regional Chamber of Commerce Mary F. Parker, Clerk, Roanoke City Council Carolyn Ross, Clerk, Vinton Town Council Forest Jones, Clerk, City of Salem Gerald A. Burgess, Botetourt County Administrator Roanoke Area Legislators - State AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 12, 1993 ORDINANCE 101293-6 AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF A TEMPORARY GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT TO THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA IN ASSOCIATION WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW FORENSIC LAB AND TO ACCEPT A WATER LINE EASEMENT AND SEWER LINE EASEMENT FROM THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA. WHEREAS, the acquisition and conveyance of several easements is required between the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, the Roanoke County School Board, and the Commonwealth of Virginia, in connection with construction on the site of the state Forensic Laboratory; and, WHEREAS, it is necessary for the County of Roanoke to acquire from the Commonwealth of Virginia a 10' water line easement and a 15' sanitary sewer line easement; and, WHEREAS, it is necessary for the Commonwealth of Virginia to acquire from the County of Roanoke a temporary grading and construction easement in order to develop a new and expanded parking facility, to be used by the State, the County, and the general public; and, WHEREAS, the proposed easements will serve the interests of the public and are necessary for the public health, safety, and welfare of citizens of the County of Roanoke. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance. A first reading of this ordinance was held on September 28, 1993; and a second reading was held on October 12, 1993. 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the interests in real estate to be conveyed are hereby declared to be surplus, and are hereby made available for other public uses by conveyance to the Commonwealth of Virginia for construction of a public parking facility. 3. That donation of a temporary grading and construction easement on the parking area lying between the Northside High School property and the Public Safety Center property, adjoining the forensic laboratory site, for reconstruction of a public parking area, to the Commonwealth of Virginia is hereby authorized. 4. That the acquisition and acceptance of a new 10' water line easement and a new 15' sanitary sewer easement from the Commonwealth of Virginia is hereby authorized and approved. 5. That any existing water or sanitary sewer easements across the property shall be vacated and abandoned upon installation, approval and acceptance of the new facilities. 6. That the easements to be conveyed and acquired involve donations and appropriation of funds is not required. 7. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such further actions as may be necessary to accomplish these conveyances and acquisitions, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 8. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ly . Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Steve Sigel, Forensic Lab Pete Haislip, Director, Parks & Recreation �..."� ���l�.:•�.,.� .Yn.��:n J.11"1J7'7'd �C3 ir.�Q31.1 �+ru /,12101d'?jOQV1 t�t31S311 37I t3I7S OIStJ�i0� 9— :10 HOISIA10 HvuT--01 Lu-= .0 I; IIS I •0 � �� a ?d•p I >I �� ,s J^ I I 1111 j - : sd fir Y � \ • I � � i 1 a i}= AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 12, 1993 RESOLUTION 101293-7 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM J - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. that the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for October 12, 1993 designated as Item J - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 8, inclusive, as follows: 1. Request for Acceptance of Ferguson Drive and Timberland Trail into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System. 2. Authorization to Pay Certain Legal Fees Regarding Firetruck Litigation with Grumman Aircraft Company. 3. Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the Industrial Development Authority. 4. Request for Resolution of Support Recognizing October as Affordable Housing Awareness Month. 5. Resolution of Support to Eliminate Unfunded Mandates by the State and Federal Government. 6. Resolution of Support for the Roanoke Valley Interstate 73 Route Alternative. 7. Acceptance of Donation of Right -of -Way for the Chester Drive Road Project. 8. Appointment of a Committee to Negotiate with Salem Cable TV Upon Terms for Renewal of their Franchise. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the Consent Resolution after discussion of Items 4 and 8, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ;fvt. Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, IN REGULAR MEETING ON THE 12th DAY OF OCTOBER, 1993, ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING. RESOLUTION 101293-7.a REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF FERGUSON DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM. WHEREAS, the described below was established on the 22th Day of January, 1974, and currently serves at least three families per mile, and WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has deemed Roanoke County's current subdivision control ordinance meets all necessary requirements to qualify this county to recommend additions to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to Section 33.1-72.1, Code of Virginia, and WHEREAS, after examining the ownership of all property abutting this street, this Board finds that speculative interest does not exist. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board request the following street be added to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to Section 33.1-72.1(D), Code of Virginia: Name of Street: Ferguson Drive Length:0.24 miles From: Timberland Trail (State Route to be determined) To: 0.24 miles in a Northwesterly direction to a turn -around Guaranteed Right -of -Way: 50 feet. Plat Recorded, Date: January 22, 1974 Plat Book: 8 Page: 60 and Plat Recorded, Date: March 14, 1975 Plat Book: 9 Page: 18. Deed Recorded, Date: June 23, 1993, Deed Book: 1406 Page 1924, Deed Recorded, Date: May 20, 1993, Deed Book: 1402 Page 930, Deed Recorded, Date: September 17,1993, Deed Book: 1399 Page 363, and Deed Recorded, Date: May 25, 1993, Deed Book: 1417 Page 373, respectively. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to improve said street to the prescribed minimum standards, funding said improvements pursuant to Section 33.1-72.1(D), Code of Virginia, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer of the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote Moved By:Supervisor Kohinke Seconded By:Not Required Yeas:Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix Nays:None A Copy Teste: ->V - Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Virginia Department of Transportation I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Resolution 101293-7.a requesting acceptance of Ferguson Drive into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System adopted by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors by a unanimous recorded vote on Tuesday, October 12, 1993. -'-A01 - Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors x1105 R F,DENSHIRE o � * 1000 ti HOM MILD 2LLJ BBR CHU�jI Cem 'iVICINI NORTH 18 , —93 3.1 31 ' e1 33 r G` ss 562-332 x�','� 21 22 31 37I 5.4 l 5.24 Ac 3.00 , 95 2�•I 3 �� 5656c z��4 - 'cs 5529 3.5OAC �" 5.59 Ac 37 45 '24/ - 4.41Ac 21 20 ` �•S' ° m 3 z 7e 969 12.65 Ac lD) 550/ 55// 7.74 Ac C)4255 4252 Z e 7z a 5 29 29• • 33 oc.n30 a •c N J9 `1` •d 8 5620 -,9 Fj 1.50 a a ? 34 545/ Ac I.00 a 298 si. 7S 18 17 01.12 4 36 40 49 3.94AC sae �1SE ss 9 5 Ac�`mDerlono Troll Ac 4OIAC2 137QC r3 .s ' 1.18Ac(D) 54377 A9l ,841"� 45.2 X93! 13 �a 115 1.44Ac (C) z. 2.44 AC 43 , ` vP I1.96Ac ,09' 14Z4� 45.1 4cJ' 4862 a 4862 7, _ q42 7i 9 2 4; �F 4 11 Ac (D) 46 1.74 Ac '0 1.0' Ac 4.1 P�9t15 VaJI R Ac (C) 1.59Ac L17Ac Ac C) 138/c90. 990 FP. e 4815 5 ��0 6 X107 5o 8 230'5, 2.73 j 723Ac� D) 469/ 1.55Ac (D) , . 1.05Ac (D) PROPOSED ADDITION SHOWN IN GRAY DESCRIPTION: 1) Ferguson Drive from Timberland Trail (State Route to be determined) in a Northwesterly direction to a turn -around. LENGTH: 0.24 MILES RIGHT OF WAY: 50 FEET ROADWAY WIDTH: 28 FEET SURFACE WIDTH: 20 FEET SERVICE: 3 HOMES ROANOKE COUNTY ACCEPTANCE OF FERGUSON DRIVE INTO THE ENGINEERING & VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM - INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 8 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, IN REGULAR MEETING ON THE 12th DAY OF OCTOBER, 1993, ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING. RESOLUTION 101293-7.b REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF TIMBERLAND TRAIL INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM. WHEREAS, the described below was established on the 22th Day of January, 1974, and currently serves at least three families per mile, and WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has deemed Roanoke County's current subdivision control ordinance meets all necessary requirements to qualify this county to recommend additions to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-72.1, Code of Virginia, and WHEREAS, after examining the ownership of all property abutting this street, this Board finds that speculative interest does not exist. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board request the following street be added to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-72.1(D), Code of Virginia: Name of Street: Timberland Trail Length:0.22 miles From: Ferguson Valley Road (State Route 721) To: 0.22 miles in a Northeasterly direction to a turn -around__ Guaranteed Right -of -Way: 50 feet. Plat Recorded, Date: January 22, 1974, Plat Book: 8 Page: 60 and Deed Recorded, Date: June 23, 1993, Deed Book:1406 Page:1924, Deed Recorded, Date: May 20, 1993, Deed Book:1402 Page:930, Deed Recorded, Date: April 22, 1993, Deed Book: 1399, Page: 363, and Deed Recorded, Date: September 17 1993, Deed Book: 1417, Page: 373, respectively. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right-of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to improve said street to the prescribed minimum standards, funding said improvements pursuant to §33.1-72.1(D), Code of Virginia, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer of the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote Moved By:Supervisor Kohinke Seconded By:Not Required Yeas:Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix Nays:None A Copy Teste: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Virginia Department of Transportation I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Resolution 101293-7.b requesting acceptance of Timberland Drive into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System adopted by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors by a unanimous recorded vote on Tuesday, October 12, 1993. Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors x 1105 Q; ` ,OENSHIRE 803"' y J O 5 x 1000 ti HOME IL 6 o z � ON OR. fEa0�S0 Pd 7z'I O ppQQKK►yl1 � Z/ 84P71ST' Bandy \ RR I -� ;�� VICINITY MAP, NORTH 705 C_v'I 1 4.4iAc 2 ,3r 563�'v q N °a s° 3329 .....,... ........,.. " " -�24/ 20 2.s N Al2 • 4,c 3501 12.65 Ac V 4?35 4?3? 5327° 29 SS// 7.74 Ac C)I ioa.ia e 8 33 29.,e o• ,34 543/ ••+19 ~ 1.96 Ar. .1 5620 ; 2 , 5 I.00Ac g �� 35 18 17 er u°on r n 3.94Ac , Ep Js t— 7 ` �tland Troil 1 Ac 36 40 2 13 ° 15 - 16• 'd �1 1.18Ac p5.53Ac{ 45.2 , '543 .0492 L44Ac 41lAc 37Ac 11.96 Ac .61 91 •'9 U.,s (C) 2.44 Anr ,�` 43 ° \gyp 4 14 45. I .. 2 a 1. a Ac 86 > P� a. l I Ac (c) re g ,,°l 46 1.74 Ac 14• ac 4.I U Oil R u7A 1.59Ac i2� � � ` Ft1• 1.03Ac C) � 6 . 11 Fp. «T1s 5 �...,� 6 / �1X10 �_Fp 21 723Ac a 439/ 1.55Ac (D) 8 2.73 1.05Ac (D) 1.85Ac (C) O 7 1.54 Ac (C) I PROPOSED ADDITION SHOWN IN GRAY DESCRIPTION: 1) Timberland Trail from Ferguson Valley Road (State Route 721) in a Northeasterly Direction to a turn -around. LENGTH: 0.22 MILES RIGHT OF WAY: 50 FEET ROADWAY WIDTH: 28 FEET SURFACE WIDTH: 20 FEET SERVICE: S HOMES ROANOKE COUNTY ACCEPTANCE OF TIMBERLAND TRAIL INTO THE ENGINEERING & VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 5 ACTION NO. A -101293-7.c ITEM NO. S' 'Z AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 12, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Authorization to Pay Certain Legal Fees Grumman Aircraft Company - Firetruck Litigation COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:��-� EXECUTIVE SUMMARY• The County agreed to share with the Town of Vinton the legal expenses for the litigation with Grumman Emergency Products Inc. over the defective ladder on the aerial fire truck. In November of 1991, the Board agreed to join with the Town of Vinton in legal action against Grumman Emergency Products, Inc. and other possible defendants over the defective ladder on the aerial fire truck which the County had jointly funded with the Town. Since this vehicle is titled to the Town of Vinton it was agreed that the Town Attorney should handle this litigation. The fees thus far approved by the Board are as follows: February 11, 1992 $ 1,151.95 March 24, 1992 1,437.59 May 26, 1992 2,363.43 June 23, 1992 1,779.16 September 8, 1992 228.71 September 22, 1992 868.75 October 27, 1992 941.00 December 1, 1992 289.00 December 15, 1992 843.00 February 23, 1993 3,835.00 March 23, 1993 6,648.60 April 4, 1993 480.10 1 May 25, 1993 June 3, 1993 July 2, 1993 July 9, 1993 August 31, 1993 Total FISCAL IMPACTS: $ 1,315.36 751.00 645.92 59.38 (Grainger) 379.25 $24,017.20 $883.63 (August 25, 1993 statement) in current fees to be paid from the Potential Litigation Account. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors authorize the payment of this invoice from the Board's Potential Litigation Account. Respectfully submitted, 00.,Y�� Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney ' Action Vote No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by Edward G. Kohinke Eddy x Denied ( ) Johnson x Received ( ) Kohinke x Referred Nickens x to Minnix x File cc: Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney c;\wp51\ageda\ger"a1\kgaUee 2 TOWN OF VINTON P. O. BOX 338 VINTON, VIRGINIA 24179 PHONE 1703) 983-0608 FAX (703) 983-0621 October 1, 1993 TO: Joe Obenshain, Senion Assistant County Attorney County of Roanoke POB 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 STATEMENT Professional Services Hahn Aerial Firespire Ladder Statement of August 25, 1993 One Half Due From Roanoke County DUE UPON RECEIPT cc: Ms. Diane Hyatt, Director of Finance Tommy Fuqua, Chief Roanoke County Fire Department JOAN B. FURBISH FINANCE DIRECTOR/TREASURER $1,767.25 $883.63 A -101293-7.d ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER Z=&mW AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANC1CB COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 12, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Industrial Development Authority COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: K11; wal wams 4 a wel• • The following nominations were made at the September 14, 1993 meeting. 1. Industrial Development Authority Darnall Supervisor Nickens nominated Darnall Vinyard to another four- year term which will expire September 26, 1997 W1•Q1S'P►1• ; • It is recommended that the above appointment be confirmed by they Board of Supervisors. Respectfully submitted, Mary H. Allen Clerk Approved by, Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved ( Motion by: Edward C. Kohinke No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy X Received ( ) Johnson x Referred ( ) Kohinke x To ( ) Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Industrial Development Authority AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 12, 1993 RESOLUTION 101293-7.e OF SUPPORT RECOGNIZING OCTOBER AS AFFORDABLE HOUSING AWARENESS MONTH WHEREAS, decent, safe, and affordable housing is the cornerstone upon which our families and our communities are built; and WHEREAS, substandard or deteriorating housing, inadequate plumbing, and overcrowding threaten the health and safety of Virginia's households and diminish the economic vitality of Virginia's communities; and WHEREAS, those Virginians with special needs for accessibility or supportive services have additional difficulty finding adequate affordable housing; and WHEREAS, the dream of decent affordable housing will only become a reality through the leadership and partnership of state and local governments, businesses and civic organizations; THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, recognizes the month of October, 1993, as AFFORDABLE HOUSING AWARENESS MONTH. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Department of Housing and Community Development AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 12, 1993 RESOLUTION 101293-7.f SUPPORTING THE ELIMINATION OF UNFUNDED MANDATES BY THE STATE AND FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WHEREAS, according to the Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission, Virginia's local governments are subject to 391 Federal and state mandates; and WHEREAS, unfunded mandates on local governments have increased significantly in recent years; and WHEREAS, federal and state mandates require cities, counties and towns to perform duties without consideration of local circumstances or capacity; and WHEREAS, in some cases mandates require local governments to redirect their priorities to meet federal and state objectives rather than community objectives; and WHEREAS, excessive federal and state regulations on local governments impose harsh pressures on local budgets, often requiring increases in local taxes and fees, and/or reduced local services for residents; and WHEREAS, existing mandates impose harsh pressures on local budgets, often requiring increases in local taxes; and WHEREAS, the cumulative impact of these legislative and regulatory actions directly affect the citizens of our cities, counties and towns; and WHEREAS, the Virginia Municipal League, the Virginia Association of Counties and the Virginia School Boards Association are working with localities, school boards and organizations across the nation to begin a public education campaign to help citizens understand and then reduce the burden and inflexibility of unfunded mandates, beginning with a National Unfunded Mandates Day on October 27, 1993; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: (1) the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, endorses the efforts of the Virginia Municipal League, the Virginia Association of Counties and the Virginia School Boards Association and their national counterparts, and supports working with the national groups to fully inform our citizens about the impact of federal and state mandates on our governments and the pocketbooks of our citizens; THAT the Board of Supervisors plans to redouble efforts to inform members of our Congressional and General Assembly delegations about the impact of federal and state mandates and plans to work with the delegations to reduce the burden of unfunded mandates on our citizens. THAT the Board of Supervisors proclaims October 27, 1993, to be "Unfunded Mandates Day in the County of Roanoke," in observance of National Unfunded Mandates Day. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk cc: File Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Virginia Association of Counties Virginia Municipal League Virginia School Boards Association Roanoke Area Legislators - State/Federal £_ . AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 12, 1993 RESOLUTION 101293-7.Q SUPPORTING THE CONSIDERATION OF THE ROANOKE VALLEY I-73 CORRIDOR ALTERNATIVE WHEREAS, the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA) identified in section 1106, (Identification of High Priority Corridor on National Highway System) proposes a north - south interstate (I-73) from Detroit to Charleston, SC; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke corridor alternative is identified as following the U.S. 460 corridor from Princeton, West Virginia to the Blacksburg-Christiansburg area, then follow I-81 to the Roanoke Valley, and run south along U.S. 220 to the North Carolina state line; and WHEREAS, Roanoke Valley companies manufacture and distribute goods and services to customers along the proposed corridor; and WHEREAS, the proposed I-73 corridor would make the Roanoke Valley more accessible to visitors along the corridor; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Roanoke County board of Supervisors wishes to express its support for the Roanoke Corridor Alternative to the Federal Highway Administration and the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT). On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: -71 . Mary H. Allen, Clerk cc: File Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Timothy W. Gubala, Director, Economic Development Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Federal Highway Administration Virginia Department of Transportation Roanoke Area Legislators - State/Federal ACTION NOS -101293-7.h ITEM NO. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROAN01W COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 12, 1993 MEETING DATE: October 12, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: ACCEPTANCE OF DONATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR THE CHESTER DRIVE ROAD PROJECT Kell) ZV WWI0v 0 4 � 4ii • i 0 10; 4 SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This consent agenda item involves the donation of the following right-of-way to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, in connection with the Chester Drive Road Project in the Hollins Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke: a) Donation of: ( i) a small triangular parcel of land shmw and designated as „PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY" on a pki� : dated May 31, 1991, prepared by the Roanoke County Engineering Department, a copy of which is Mime- d, hereto; and (ii) all right, title and interest, now i 611 or hereafter acquired, in .and to that certain road known and designated as Chester Drive, being 50' in width leading to and from Virginia Secondary Route 1803 (Dexter Drive); from Charles A. McNutt and Julie B. McNutt, husband and wife, (Deed Book 1292, Page 1231) (Tax leap No. 27.14-6-5). County staff has inspected and approved the location and dimensions of the right-of-way for the project. FISCAL IMPACT: No county funding is required for this acquisition. 5-7 Staff recommends acceptance of the donation of right-of-way for the Chester Drive Road Project. Respectfully submitted, I M Vickle L. Hu an\ Assistant Co y Attorney Action Approved (x) Motion by Edward G. Kohinke Eddy Denied ( ) Johnson Received ( ) Kohinke Referred Nickens to Minnix cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Vote No Yes Abs x x x x x •1 1VWTES AND SOUNDS OE go1wilium SHOWN ON THIS PLAT REPRESENT A COUPOSITEOFDEEM PLATSo AND CALCULATED WOMOMN AAD DO NOT REFLECT AN ACCURATE BOUNDARY SURVEIL. CURVE A R = 40.0 ,!2s = 705942" L = 5.58 27.14-6-4 POPE, ROLAND JR., a LINDA W TAX MAP NO. 2 7.14 - 6 - 5 PROPOSED RIGHT -OF- WAY w M � 3 �o Z M rn �o h McNUTT, CHARLES A. a JULIE B. SO,00, N 2p• 29, W BY SES A. & JUM B. M M 27.14-6-6 ISBEL, CHARLES J. a LILLIAN J. SCALE: 1 " : 40' PREPARED BY. ROANOKE COUNTY FNe:INFFA1Aft: n=ow 071INCILM - - — - - ACTION NO. A -101293-7.i ITEM NO.y — AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: October 12, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: Appointment of a committee to negotiate with Salem Cable TV upon terms for renewal of a franchise to operate a cable television system in a portion of Roanoke County. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Roanoke County's current franchise agreement with Boothe Communications Company, doing business as "Salem Cable TV," to operate a cable television system within a portion of the county adjacent to the City of Salem will expire on or about May 22, 1994. A committee composed of Edward G. Kohinke, Dr. Harry C. Nickens, Dr. Jane James, Joseph B. Obenshain and Anne Marie Green is recommended to negotiate terms for the renewal of this franchise agreement with Boothe Communications Company's local representa- tives. BACKGROUND: Immense changes have occurred in the cable television industry over the past fifteen years culminating in the passage of The Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992 (the 111992 Cable Act" hereafter). Equally significant for Roanoke County was the renegotiation of its franchise agreement with Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc., in 1991 which is resulting in substantial increases in channel capacity, extension of service, an increase in the franchise fee, a fiber optic institutional network, free cable service to county schools and governmental buildings and more PEG channels. This impending franchise renewal process offers an opportunity to bring to county residents within the area served by Salem Cable TV the opportunity for equality of services to those offered to county residents by Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: A committee is proposed consisting of five individuals who have direct interest or experience in the issues which are anticipated to be of most direct concern in the renegotiation of a franchise agreement with Salem Cable TV, a Boothe Communications Company. The qualifications of the individuals proposed are as �+ V follows: Edward G. Kohinke, member of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors representing the Catawba District served by Salem Cable TV; Dr. Harry C. Nickens, member of the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors and the Roanoke Regional Cable Television Committee (R.R. CATV Comm.) on which he serves as vice-chairman; Joseph B. Obenshain, Esq., Senior Assistant County Attorney, served as legal counsel for the county during negotiations with Cox Cable Roanoke, Inc., for franchise renewal in 1990-91 and currently the County's legal counsel to the R.R. CATV Comm.; Anne Marie Green, Roanoke County's Director of Community Relations and member of the R.R. CATV Comm. including serving on its Operations subcommittee; and Dr. Jane James, Director of Media Services for Roanoke County Schools and a member of the R.R. CATV Comm. FISCAL IMPACTS• No direct fiscal impact upon Roanoke County from the negotia- tion process is anticipated. Additional revenue for the County may ultimately result from any increase in the franchise fee which is negotiated as part of the franchise renewal process. ALTERNATIVES• 1. Approve the appointment of the designated negotiating committee. 2. Develop an alternative approach for conducting negotia- tions with representatives of Salem Cable TV for renewal of their franchises. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of Alternative 1. Respectfully submitted, } J eph f. Obenshain S for Assistant County Attorney Action Vote No Yes Abs Approved (Ki) Motion by Edward C, Kohinke Eddy x Denied ( ) to approve staff recommendationJohnson x Received ( ) Kohinke x Referred Nickens x to Minnix x cc: File Joseph B. Obenshain, Sr Assist County Attorney Anne Marie Green R. R,CATV Com. Dr. Jane James, R.R. CATV Com. Boothe Corimiications Randolph H. Smith, Salem City Mgr. AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 12, 1993 RESOLUTION 101293-8 CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Certification Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: _70 Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Executive Session CORRECTED 10/25/93 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 12, 1993 ORDINANCE 101293-9 AMENDING AND REENACTING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAPS FOR ROANOKE COUNTY, BY THE ADOPTION OF CERTAIN MISCELLANEOUS CHANGES TO SAID MAPS (COTTON HILL) WHEREAS, on December 15, 1992, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted Ordinance 121592-10 which amended the Zoning District Maps for Roanoke County; and, WHEREAS, on September 14, 1993, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted Ordinance 91493-11 which amended the Zoning District Maps for Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, citizens in various areas of the County have requested that the zoning classifications as reflected in the new zoning district maps of their properties be re-examined to address their questions and concerns; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held public hearings on June 1, 1993 and July 6, 1993, and have made recommendations to the Board; and WHEREAS, public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice require that the following properties and zoning district maps be, and hereby are, submitted to the Board of Supervisors for amendment; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law, and that the first reading of this ordinance was held on July 27, 1993 and the second reading and public hearing was 1 held on September 14, 1993 and continued to October 12, 1993. BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That 111992 Zoning District Maps of Roanoke County, Virginia" are hereby amended and reenacted as the zoning district maps for Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: (A) That the following described properties are hereby changed from AG -1, Agriculture/Rural Low Density District, to AR, Agricutural/Residential District: 96.02-1-1 96.02-1-2 97.03-2-5 a p/o 97.01-2-17 (south of the Blue Ridge Parkway) a p/o 96.02-1-46 (south of the Blue Ridge Parkway, excluding the critical area) (B) That the following described properties are hereby changed from AG -1, Agriculture/Rural Low Density District, to R-1, Low Density Residential District: 96.07-1-6 a p/o 96.02-1-46 (north of the Blue Ridge Parkway, excluding the critical area) 2. That said map or maps entitled "ZONING GLTT ;GE;S BON K and"ZONING CHANGES COTTON HILL AND POAGES VALLEY ROAD" (dated July 21, 1993) are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 3. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is 0a directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On substitute motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Nickens NAYS: Supervisors Eddy, Minnix A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 3