Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout6/27/1995 - Adopted Board RecordsR AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 27, 1995 RESOLUTION 62795-1 RECOMMENDING LEGISLATIVE PROPOSALS TO THE VIRGINIA ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES FOR THE 1996 SESSION OF THE VIRGINIA GENERAL ASSEMBLY WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, has identified major legislative issues of state-wide concern to be considered by the 1996 session of the Virginia General Assembly; and WHEREAS, by this resolution the Board is recommending these issues to its statewide organization, the Virginia Association of Counties, for consideration in the adoption of its legislative program. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the following legislative proposals are submitted to the Virginia Association of Counties for consider- ation in its 1996 Legislative Program. M 1996 LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM 1. Relief from recycling mandate - Repeal the 25% recycling mandate on local governments found in § 10.1-1411 on all waste collected by private haulers and diverted from waste disposal or recycling facilities identified to receive such waste as provided in the local solid waste management plan. In addition, require that private waste haulers diverting such waste be held accountable and responsible for meeting the same recycling rates and requirements as local governments. 1 The Board may recall that ,the 1995 Session of the Virginia General Assembly adopted a waste hauler displacement bill which substantially restricted the ability of local governments to regulate the flow of waste or to displace private companies providing waste hauling services (HB 1802). This legislation substantially restricts the ability of local governments to "displace" private companies providing waste hauling services however, it does not impose on these private companies any of the responsibilities or recycling mandates imposed on local govern- ments. The General Assembly should relieve local governments of these recycling mandates and impose on the private waste haulers the same obligations and responsibilities for recycling currently imposed on local governments. 2. BPOL Tax - Maintain the local option business license tax ($3 million annual impact on Roanoke County). 3. Regional cooperation - Support the creation of financial incentives by the Commonwealth for local governments to cooperate in the regional delivery of services. 4. E911 Tax - Amend § 58.1-3813 to expand eligible costs for this tax to include public safety radios, mobile data terminals, and communications equipment necessary to implement an E911 system. 5. Amendment of § 14.1-46.01:1 to increase the supplementary salary for the chairman of the board of supervisors from $1,800 to $2,500. 6. Education - Realizing that public education is the foundation of American democracy and the cornerstone of our future 2 economic well being, the County urges the General Assembly to enhance funding for public education, including increasing the funds available to the Literary Fund for local school capital construction or renovation projects. Local school divisions should be authorized to establish opening dates for school. Disparity funding should be based not only upon the number of students eligible for free or reduced fee lunches, but also upon the locality's local tax effort in support of education. Disparity funding should be based upon the composite index (which measures a locality's relative fiscal ability to provide its share of the cost of a local school system that meets the standards of quality) and the locality's local effort in support of that school system. II That the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors is directed to send a certified copy of this resolution to the Executive Director of the Virginia Association of Counties. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Minnix NAYS: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. H lton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney — James D. Campbell, Executive Director, VACo 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 27, 1995 ORDINANCE 62795-2 APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR THE 1995-96 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET FOR ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA WHEREAS, upon notice duly published in the newspaper, a public hearing was held on May 23, 1995, concerning the adoption of the annual budget for Roanoke County for fiscal year 1995-96; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, approved said budget on June 13, 1995, pursuant to the provisions of Section 13.02 of the Roanoke County Charter and Chapter 4 of Title 15.1 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this appropriation ordinance was held on June 13, 1995, and the second reading of this ordinance was held on June 27, 1995, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the following appropriations are hereby made from the respective funds for the period beginning July 1, 1995, and ending June 30, 1996, for the functions and purposes indicated: County of Roanoke Proposed FY 1995-96 Budget June 27, 1995 Revenues: General Fund: General Government Youth Haven II Comprehensive Services Law Library Recreation Fee Class Internal Services Garage II Total General Fund Debt Service Fund Capital Projects Fund Internal Service Fund - Risk Management Water Fund: Water Operations 1991 Water Revenue Bonds Water Repair and Replacement Other Water Surplus Total Water Fund Sewer Fund: Sewer Operations Sewer Repair and Replacement Total Sewer Fund School Funds: Operating Cafeteria Grant Textbook Other Total School Fund Total All Funds 06/19/95 11:23 AM m:\finance\budget\book-wk\APPROP96.WK4 $ 89,379,898 387,247 1,126,122 41,980 616,763 1,461,964 257,278 $ 93,271,252 $ 8,706,612 $ 575,000 $ 1,169,996 $ 9,616,728 164,621 350,000 574,054 743,059 $ 11,448,462 $ 5,002,266 348,889 $ 5,351,155 $ 76,103,239 2,995,000 1,652,032 777,283 1,500,000 $ 83,027,554 $ 203,550,031 Z-1 si County of Roanoke Proposed FY 1995-96 Budget June 27, 1995 Expenditures: $ 101,626 General Government: 34,083 General Administration 1,255 Board of Supervisors $ 223,807 County Administrator 185,385 Community Relations 109,839 Asst. Co. Administrators 280,401 Property Management 80,403 Human Resources 358,236 County Attorney 285,471 Economic Development 646,691 Total General Administration $ 2,170.233 Constitutional Officers Treasurer $ 526,310 Commonwealth Attorney 448,765 Victim/Witness 5,048 Commissioner of the Revenue 550,103 Clerk of the Circuit Court 651,280 Sheriffs Office 1,052,533 Care & Confinement of Prisoners 2,8589140 Total Constitutional Officers $ 6,092,179 Judicial Administration Circuit Court $ 101,626 General District Court 34,083 Magistrate 1,255 J & DR Court 10,429 Court Service Unit 172,385 Total Judicial Administration $ 319,778 Management Services County Assessor $ 626,463 Financial Planning 616,442 Public Transportation 70,200 Management and Budget 108,152 Procurement Services 269,518 Total Management Services $ 1,690,775 06/19/95 11:23 AM m:\finance\budget\book-wk\APPROP96.WK4 County of Roanoke Proposed FY 1995-96 Budget June 27, 1995 Public Safety Police $ 5,025,520 Transportation Safety Commission 960 E911 Maintenance 423,717 Fire and Rescue 3,799,103 Total Public Safety $ 9,249,300 Community Services General Services $ 456,484 Solid Waste Venture Capital 3,320,934 Engineering and Inspections 1,063,713 2,420,711 Building Maintenance 1,309,483 Planning and Zoning 460,249 Planning Commission 20,612 Total Community Services $ 7,988,473 Human Services Grounds Maintenance $ 1,328,057 Parks and Recreation 1,217,725 Public Health 425,333 Social Services Administration 2,156,828 Public Assistance 952,400 Institutional Care 30,500 Social Service Organizations 119,332 Contributions Human Service Organizations 82,213 Contributions Cultural Organizations 178,526 Library 1,485,404 VPI Extension 70,420 Elections 197,499 Total Human Services $ 8,244,237 - Non -Departmental Employee Benefits $ 1,945,000 Miscellaneous 879,640 Venture Capital 25,000 Internal Service Charges 1,063,713 Total Non -Departmental $ 3,913,353 06/19/95 11:23 AM m:\finance\budget\book-wk\APPROP96.WK4 County of Roanoke Proposed FY 1995-96 Budget June 27, 1995 Transfers to Other Funds Transfer to Debt - General $ 3,624,207 Transfer to Debt Service - School 1,868,697 Transfer to Capital 575,000 Transfer to Schools 39,419,760 Transfer to Schools - Capital 1,850,000 Transfer to Schools - Dental Insurance 260,932 Transfer to Internal Services 1,169,996 Transfer to Comprehensive Services 313,015 Transfer to Garage II 100,000 Transfer to Youth Haven II 25,000 Total Transfers to Other Funds $ 49,206,607 Unappropriated Balance Board Contingency $ 100,000 Addition to Fund Balance 404,963 Total General Government $ 89,379,898 Youth Haven II $ 387,247 Comprehensive Services $ 1,126,122 Law Library $ 41,980 Recreation Fee Class $ 616,763 Internal Services Management Information Systems $ 914,301 Communications 547,663 Total Internal Services $ 1,461,964 Garage II $ 257,278 Total General Fund $ 93,271,252 Debt Service Fund $ 8,706,612 Capital Projects Fund $ 575,000 06/19/95 11:23 AM m:\fmance\budget\book-wk\APPROP96.WK4 County of Roanoke Proposed FY 1995-96 Budget June 27, 1995 Internal Services Fund - Risk Management Water Fund: Water Operations 1991 Water Revenue Bonds Water Repair and Replacement Other Water Surplus Total Water Fund Sewer Fund: Sewer Operations Sewer Repair and Replacement Total Sewer Fund School Funds: Operating Cafeteria Grant Text Book Other Total School Funds Total All Funds 06/19/95 11:23 AM m:\finance\budget\book-wk\APPROP96.WK4 $ 1,169,996 $ 9,616,728 164,621 350,000 574,054 743,059 $ 11448,462 $ 5.002,266 348,889 $ 5,351,155 $ 76,103,239 2,995,000 1,652,032 777,283 1,500,000 $ 83.027,554 $ 203.550,031 2. That the County Administrator may authorize or delegate the authorization of the transfer of any unencumbered balance or portion thereof from one department to another within a fund. 3. That all funded outstanding encumbrances, both operating and capital, at June 30, 1995, are reappropriated to the 1995-96 fiscal year to the same department and account for which they are encumbered in the previous year. 4. That appropriations designated for capital projects will not lapse at the end of the fiscal year but shall remain appropriated until the completion of the project or until the Board of Supervisors, by appropriate action, changes or eliminates the appropriation. Upon completion of a capital project, staff is authorized to close out the project and transfer to the funding source any remaining balances. This section applies to appropriations for Capital Projects at June 30, 1995, and appropriations in the 1995-96 budget. 5. That all school fund appropriations remaining at the end of the 1994-95 fiscal year not lapse but shall be appropriated to the School Capital Improvements Fund in fiscal year 1995-96. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: Supervisor Eddy A COPY TESTE: 6U4'e& 9 A-�A� Brenda J. Holto , Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: 6 Brent Robertson Budget Manager g g Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney D. Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant Administrator Don C. Myers, Assistant Administrator AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 27, 1995 ORDINANCE 62795-3 TO INCREASE THE SALARIES OF THE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.07 OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CHARTER AND SECTION 14.1-46.0- 1:1 OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, Section 3.07 of the Charter of the County of Roanoke provides for the compensation of members of the Board of Supervisors and the procedure for increasing their salaries; and WHEREAS, Section 14.1-46.01:1 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, establishes the annual salaries of members of boards of supervisors within certain population brackets; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, has heretofore established the annual salaries of Board members to be $10,161 by Ordinance 61494-7 and further has established the additional annual compensation for the chairman for the Board to be $1,800 and for the vice-chairman of the Board to be $1,200; and WHEREAS, this section provides that the maximum annual salaries therein provided may be adjusted in any year by an inflation factor not to exceed five (5%) percent; and WHEREAS, the first reading on this ordinance was held on June 13, 1995; the second reading and public hearing was held on June 27, 1995. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the annual salaries of members of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, are hereby increased by an inflation factor of 5% pursuant to the provisions of Section 3.07 of the Roanoke County Charter and Section 14.1-46.01:1 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended. The new annual salaries shall be $10,669 for members of the Board. In addition, the chairman of the Board will receive an additional annual sum of $1,800 and the vice-chairman of the Board will receive an additional sum of $1,200. This ordinance shall take effect on July 1, 1995. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the ordinance with 5% increase, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy NAYS: Supervisors Nickens, Minnix A COPY TESTE: &941� Q, Au� Brenda J. Italtoh, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney D. Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 27, 1995 RESOLUTION 62795-4 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM L - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for June 27, 1995, designated as Item L - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 6, inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of Minutes for May 17, 1995. 2. Resolutions requesting acceptance of following recreational and industrial access roads into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary State System: a. .88 miles - Green Hill Park Road (Route #1185) b. .26 miles - Goode Park Road (Route #961) C. .20 miles - Clearbrook Park Road (Route #908) d. .20 miles - Garst Mill Park Road (Route #1373) e. .14 miles - Walrond Park Road (Route 823) f. .40 miles - Valley Tech Road (Route #830) 3. Designation of Voting Delegate to National Association of Counties Annual Conference, July 21 - 25, 1995. 4. Confirmation of appointment of parent representative to the Community Policy and Management Team. 5. Request for official acceptance and appropriation of $150,000 Community Improvement Grant for Valley TechPark to the Capital Projects Fund. . 6. Approval of Investment Policy Amendments. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and J directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the Consent Agenda, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Hol on, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, 27TH DAY OF JUNE 1995, ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING: RESOLUTION 62795-4.a REQUESTING THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO ADD LINK A -B, A DISTANCE OF 0.88 MILES, GREEN HILL PARK ROAD, ROUTE #1185, TO THE SECONDARY SYSTEM OF STATE HIGHWAYS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 33.1-229, CODE OF VIRGINIA. WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has constructed Green Hill Park Road under Project 1185-080-239,C501, and WHEREAS, the project sketch, attached and incorporated herein as a part of this resolution, defines adjustments required in the secondary system of state highways as a result of that construction, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add Link A -B, a distance of 0.88 miles, Green Hill Park Road, Route #1185 to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code of Virginia, for which sections this Board hereby guarantees the right of way to be clear and unrestricted, including any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board orders that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote Moved By: Supervisor Kohinke Seconded By: None Required Yeas: Supervisors Johnson Kohinke Eddy Nickens Minnix Nays: None A Copy Teste: 6U&e& Q, sg� Brenda J. Ho ton, Deputy Clerk cc: File Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Virginia Department of Transportation Z,- a , a-, COUNTT ROANOKE DATE Or RESOLUTION: SUUU I V 15 1 ON GRFM HILL PARK ROAD - RTE 1185 I� 460 - 760 RaAnioKE RtVBp J I I B5 _ X39 A 3 4,/ 8 639 �3$ Proposed additions shown in red. (1) Link A-8 (2) (3) Length: (1) 0.88 mi (2) (3) — Condition: Good Roadway Width: 46' & Variable Surface Widths: 24' & Variable Service: Recreational Access Improvements to be glade: Nate Eutimated Cost to puff into maintainable conditions 0 Resident Engineer's Recommendation: Accept Date: AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER' ON TUESDAY, 27TH DAY OF JUNE 1995, ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING: RESOLUTION 62795-4.b REQUESTING THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO ADD LINK A -B, A DISTANCE OF 0.26 MILES, GOODE PARK ROAD, ROUTE #961, TO THE SECONDARY SYSTEM OF STATE HIGHWAYS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 33.1-229, CODE OF VIRGINIA. WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has constructed Goode Park Road under Project 0961-080-208,N501, and WHEREAS, the project sketch, attached and incorporated herein as a part of this resolution, defines adjustments required in the secondary system of state highways as a result of that construction, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board. requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add Link A -B, a distance of 0.26 miles, Goode Park Road, Route #961, to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code of Virginia, for which sections this Board hereby guarantees the right of way to be clear and unrestricted, including any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board orders that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote Moved By: Supervisor Kohinke Seconded By: None Reauired Yeas: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix Nays: None A Copy Teste: Brenda J. H ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Virginia Department of Transportation COUNTY MANX DATE Of RESOLUTION: SUBDIVISION �pEPARK RW-- RTF 961 Proposed additions shown in red. (1) Link A -B (2) (3) Length: (1) 0.26 mi (2) (3) R/H : 501 Condition: Good Roadway Width: 44' Surface Widths: 22t Service: Recreational Access t Improvements to be Made: None Estimated Cost to put into maintainable condition: 0 Resident Engineerle Reco=4endation: Accept Da Le N Tow tJ L1 mrTS . 05 �� VIMb�1 , j 24 .07 Mi A � 654 r Proposed additions shown in red. (1) Link A -B (2) (3) Length: (1) 0.26 mi (2) (3) R/H : 501 Condition: Good Roadway Width: 44' Surface Widths: 22t Service: Recreational Access t Improvements to be Made: None Estimated Cost to put into maintainable condition: 0 Resident Engineerle Reco=4endation: Accept Da Le AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, 27TH DAY OF JUNE 1995, ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING: RESOLUTION 62795-4.c REQUESTING THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO ADD LINK A -B, A DISTANCE OF 0.20 MILES, CLEARBROOK PARK ROAD, ROUTE #908., TO THE SECONDARY SYSTEM OF STATE HIGHWAYS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 33.1-229, CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has constructed Clearbrook Park Road under Project 0908-080-210,N501, and WHEREAS, the project sketch, attached and incorporated herein as a part of this resolution, defines adjustments required in the secondary system of state highways as a result of that construction, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add Link A -B, a distance of 0.20 miles, Clearbrook Park Road, Route #908, to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code of Virginia, for which sections this Board hereby guarantees the right of way to be clear and unrestricted, including any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board orders that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote Moved By: Supervisor Kohinke Seconded By: None Required Yeas: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy Nickens Minnix Nays: None cc: A Copy Teste: 2 Q 4dl,�e� Brenda J. Ho ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Virginia Department of Transportation Inspections J COUNTY ROANOKE DATE or RESOLUTION: SUBDIVISION CLEARBROOK PARK ROAD - RT. 908 N B ZZo •f v A 675 v 6sa Proposed additions aliown in red. (1) Link A-8_ (2) (3) Length: (1) 0,20 mi (2) (3) R/N: 601 - Condition: Good Roadway Hidtll: 44, Surface Widths: 22' Service: Recreational Access Improvements to be Made: None Estimated Cost to put into maintainable condition: 0 Resident Engineerle Recoimnendatiout Da to U AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER" ON TUESDAY, 27TH DAY OF JUNE 1995, ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING: RESOLUTION 62795-4.d REQUESTING THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO ADD LINK A -B, A DISTANCE OF 0.20 MILES, GARST MILL PARK ROAD, ROUTE #1373, TO THE SECONDARY SYSTEM OF STATE HIGHWAYS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 33.1-229, CODE OF VIRGINIA. WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has constructed Garst Mill Park Road under Project 1373-080-211,N501, and WHEREAS, the project sketch, attached and incorporated herein as a part of this resolution, defines adjustments required in the secondary system of state highways as a result of that construction, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add Link A -B, a distance of 0.20 miles, Garst Mill Park Road, Route #1373, to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code of Virginia, for which sections this Board hereby guarantees the right of way to be clear and unrestricted, including any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board orders that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote Moved By: Supervisor Kohinke Seconded By: None Required Yeas: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy Nickens Minnix Nays: None cc: A Copy Teste: 9. 40-�4vly� C" Brenda J. Hol on, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Virginia Department of Transportation Inspections COUNTY ROANOKE DATE or 11CSOLUTION: SUIlU 1 V I S l ON 11RS7 MTI I PAPA Donn RTF 1 �7� N X37 � A B 8 Propo©ed additiane chown in red. (1) Link A -B (2) (3) Length: (1) 0.20 mi (2) (3) it/w: 50' Condition: Good Roadway Widths 44' Surface widths: 22' Services Recreational Access Improvements to be Made: None Eutimated Coat to puff into maintainable conditions o Itoaident Engineerte ltommmidatiolli _ Ar= U�ii Le: AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, 27TH DAY OF JUNE 1995, ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING: RESOLUTION 62795-4.e REQUESTING THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO ADD LINK A -B, A DISTANCE OF 0.14 MILES, WALROND PARK -ROAD, ROUTE #823, TO THE SECONDARY SYSTEM OF STATE HIGHWAYS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 33.1-229, CODE OF VIRGINIA. WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has constructed Walrond Park Road under Project 0823-080-209-N501, and WHEREAS, the project sketch, attached and incorporated herein as a part of this resolution, defines adjustments required in the secondary system of state highways as a result of that construction, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add Link A -B, a distance of 0.14 miles, Walrond Park Road, Route #823, to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code of Virginia, for which sections this Board hereby guarantees the right of way to be clear and unrestricted, including any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board orders that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote Moved By: Supervisor Kohinke Seconded By: None Required Yeas: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke Eddy Nickens Minnix Nays: None A Copy Teste: &A� a 6kvin=� Brenda J. Wlton, Deputy Clerk cc: File Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Virginia Department of Transportation COUNTY ROANOKE DATE OF RCSOLUTION: SUBDIVISION ',A-ROND PARK ROAD - RTE. 823 N s sa3 Ii3�,;� �,o�M► IIS A 14ab Proposed additions shown in red. (1) Link A -B (2) (3) Length: (1) 0.14 mi (2) (3) R/W: 501 - Condition: Good Roadway Width: 44, Surface Widths: 22' Service! Recreational Access Improvements to be Made: None Estimated Cost to put into maintainable conditions 0 Resident Engiueerle Rec:ormnendation: Arcpnt Da to : AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER" ON TUESDAY, 27TH DAY OF JUNE 1995, ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING: RESOLUTION 62795-4 .f REQUESTING THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO ADD LINK A -B, A DISTANCE OF 0.40 MILES, VALLEY TECH ROAD, ROUTE #830, TO THE SECONDARY SYSTEM OF STATE HIGHWAYS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 33.1-229 OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA. WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation has constructed Valley Tech Industrial Road under Projects 0830-080- 294,M501, and 0011-080-R07, M501, and WHEREAS, the project sketch, attached and incorporated herein as a part of this resolution, defines adjustments required in the secondary system of state highways as a result of that construction, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add Link A -B, a distance of 0.40 miles, Valley Tech Road, Route #830, to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code of Virginia, for which sections this Board hereby guarantees the right of way to be clear and unrestricted, including any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board orders that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote Moved By: Supervisor Kohinke Seconded By: None Required Yeas: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix Nays: None A Copy Teste: !�v Brenda J. Ho on, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Virginia Department of Transportation 0 L.- a, -P COUNTY ROANOKE DATE Or RESOLUTION. - SUBDIVISION VAI FY TECH - RTE 830 N . (off rhi E o A 8 Proposed additions shown in red. (1) Link A -B (2) (3) Length: (1) 0.40 mi (�) (3) R/W: 60' Condition: Good Roadway Width: 3rl 6 Surface Widths: 36' with cmb & gutter Service: Industrial Access Improvements to be Made: None Latimated Cost to put into maintainable conditions 0 Resident Engineer's Recomnendationt Accept Date: i ACTION NO. A -62795-4.g ITEM NUMBER /— —3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 27, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Designation of Voting Delegate to the National Association of Counties Conference, July 21- 25, 1995 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The National Association of Counties 60th Annual Conference will be held July 21 - 25, 1995, at the Georgia World Congress Center in Fulton County, (Atlanta) Georgia. Treasurer Alfred C. Anderson has advised that he plans to attend this conference and is willing to serve as the voting delegate for Roanoke County at the business meeting. It is recommended that the Board designate Mr. Anderson to serve in this voting capacity, and return the voting credentials form to NACo. ja 1161:�-?o4 Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION Approved (x) Motion by: Motion by Edward G. Denied ( ) Kohinke to approve Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) cc: File Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer Credentials Committee, NACo VOTE No Yes Abs Eddy x Johnson x Kohinke x Minnix x Nickens x 06/19/95 MON 13:05 FAX 202 393 2630 NACO IZ002 N A C 0 Nationai Association of Counties MEMORANDUM ELECTION OF OFFICERS! ELECTION OF OFFICERS! ELECTION OF OFFICERS! To: County Executives, County Board Chairs, Parish Presidents, and Borough Mayors From: Randall Franke, NACo President Date: May 24,1995 Re: Voting Credentials - 1995 Annual Conference It's that time again! We are in the midst of preparing for NACo's 60th Annual Conference to be held July 21 - July 25, 1995 in Fulton County, (Atlanta) Georgia. We need your help to insure that your county will be able to participate in the Association's annual election of officers and policy adoption for this year's American County Platform. Please tell us on the enclosed form the name of the voting delegate and alternate(s) authorized to pick up your county's credentials material. Note that the NACo bylaws permit only dues -paying member counties to vote and that a registration fee for the conference must be paid. Also, state association executive directors or presidents will be entitled to pick up unclaimed credentials as of Monday, July 24. If you do not want the state association to be allowed to do so, please note such on the form. PLEASE RETURN THE ENCLOSED FORM TO NACO BY FRIDAY, JUNE 23. SEND TO: Credentials Committee c/o Membership Coordinator 4401st Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20001 Thank you in advance for your prompt attention to this matter. We look forward to seeing you at the Annual Conference. Enclosure 440 First Street, NV'i Washington, DC 20001-2080 1021393-6216 Fax 2111993-2630 LJ 0 National Association of Counties Counties Care for America 440 First Street N. W. * WhshinVW4 D.C: 20001 • 2021393-2630 CREDENTIALS IDEN7IFTCATION FORM County Name: County of Roanoke State: Virginia Alfred C. Anderson Treasurer Designated Delegate: Name Title Altemate(s) by Name and Title: None We do not t tate iatioa Re entadve to pick up onr Credentials Material. (cluck box) Q Sign a Title chairman. Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Date June 27. 1995 A -62795-4.h ACTION NO. _ ITEM NUMBER - AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 27, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Appointment of the Parent Representative to the Community Policy and Management Team COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: The Comprehensive Services Act for At Risk Youth and their Families became effective July 1, 1993 and requires each community to have a Community Policy and Management Team (C.P.M.T.) comprised of the heads of certain agencies specified in the legislation and two parent representatives. The parent representatives must have children who have been impacted by one of the programs covered under the act which includes those of special education, foster care, youth and family services, etc. Rita Gliniecki, one of the current parent representatives, has served well in this capacity for the past year and her term expires July 31, 1995. She has been a positive influence to this team and has expressed a desire to be re -appointed for another one year term. The Board of Supervisors is asked to confirm this appointment at your June 27, 1995 meeting. RECOMMENDATION• The C.P.M.T. respectfully requests that the Board re -appoint Ms. Gliniecki to continue service on the C.P.M.T. for another one year term effective August 1, 1995. Respectfully submitted, Approved` by, John M. Chambli s, Jr. Elmer C. dg Assistant Administrator County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION VOTE Motion by: Motion by Edward G. No Kohinke to approve Eddy _ Johnson Kohinke _ Minnix _ Nickens cc: File John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant Administrator Community Policy and Management Team File Yes Abs x x x x x A -62795-4.j ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER `— P AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE• June 27, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: Investment policy amendments COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: The County has had an investment policy since 1987. At the time the original one was adapted, it was announced that it was a living document and would need to be revised from time to time. It was revised in 1992 and again in 1994. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: On page 4 we are adding our "Orange County" paragraph. We are currently avoiding these instruments as they violate state law. This language is useful in avoiding pitfalls such as derivatives. On page 5 we are want to make it clear that safety comes first, as we do elsewhere in the document. On page 5 we are correcting a typo error by removing the word On page 11 we are bringing the percentage in line with the State Code. On page 11 we are making it clear this refers to institutions as broker/dealers and not to institutions as issuers. The provision is recognized on page 18 of the document. On page 20, "prime quality" commercial paper is defined as A2/P2 or better. The Code allows A2/P2 paper, but only if prior approval is obtained from your 'entity that determines investment policy", and a credit report is prepared in advance justifying the creditworthiness of the issuer. We believe it is prudent to use only A1/P1 paper. FISCAL IMPACT: Further protects County Funds. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: We recommend this be approved. - Respectfully submuEted, Alfred C. Anderson, County Treasurer Approved by, Elmer C. H dg , County Administrator L- � ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Motion by Edward G. No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Kohinke to approve Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred ( ) Kohinke x To ( ) Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Mary H. Hicks, Policy Manual 0 1 COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA I. Investment and Portfolio Policy A. Identification: 1. Purpose and Scope This policy shall establish guidelines for the efficient management of County funds and shall apply to activities with regard to the investment of the financial assets of the County. The goal of the policy is to allow the County to obtain the highest possible yield on available County financial assets, consistent with constraints imposed by its safety objectives, cash flow considerations and Virginia state laws that restrict the placement of public funds. 2. General Guidelines The Treasurer of the County of Roanoke is an Elected Constitutional Officer whose responsibility in part is receiving, collecting, safeguarding and disbursing county funds from all sources. It shall be the responsibility of the Treasurer, however he may designate a deputy to manage the day-to-day operations of the investment portfolio and place the actual purchase/sell orders with brokers. The Treasurer shall advise the County Finance Board, which is the Board of Supervisors, when the investment policy is altered and at the end of each month report to them the amount of money on deposit with each depository. Specifically excluded from these guidelines are L---1 2 funds that by statue or ordinance require specific investments. 3. Authorized Investments As a unit of local government in the State of Virginia, the County of Roanoke is restricted by Virginia Security for Public Deposits Act, Sec. 2.1-359 through 2.1-370 and the Code of Virginia, Title 2 Investment of Public Funds to the following types of securities as described in Sec. 2. 1-327 through 2.1- 329: a. Bonds, notes and other evidence of indebtedness of the State of Virginia. b. Bonds, notes and other direct obligations of the United States and securities unconditionally guaranteed as to the payment of principal and interest by the United States or any agency thereof. c. Bonds, notes and other evidence of indebtedness of any county, city, town, district, authority or other public body of the State of Virginia. d. Bonds and other obligations issued, guaranteed or assumed by the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development and the Asian Development Bank. e. Certificates of deposit in commercial banks up to their net worth provided they are approved by the State Treasury Board in the State's Collateral protection pool in accordance with the Virginia Public Deposits Act. f. Certificates of deposit in commercial banks, savings and L i CD 3 loan associations and mutual savings bank doing business in this State up to FDIC and FSLIC insurance coverage. g. Bankers' Acceptances h. Repurchase Agreements provided the securities for the agreement are written against specific government securities as authorized under Sec. 2.1-328. As a matter of policy, the county must take delivery of the securities purchased through a repurchase agreement if the term of the agreement is greater than four (4) days. If the term is less than four (4) days, the securities may be held in safekeeping by the bank for the account of the county. Pledged securities under repurchase agreements must be based on market value, not face value. When entering a repurchase agreement where delivery is not required, the county shall obtain a safekeeping receipt for specific securities. Refer to Part II Repurchase Agreements for complete details. i. Money Market Funds Deposit -type securities shall be collateralized through the State Collateral Pool as required by Virginia Public Deposits Acts for any amount exceeding FDIC or FSLIC coverage. Other investments shall be collateralized by the aptual security held in safekeeping by the primary agent. All investments will be in the name of the County of Roanoke and will name the specific fund from which the instrument was purchased. Safekeeping account receipts will be held by the Treasurer's Office. 4 The Treasurer will continually monitor the contents of the portfolio, the available markets and the relative values of competing instruments, and will adjust the portfolio accordingly. CMOs, inverse floating rate securities, floating rate securities tied to a non -money market instrument, IO's, PO's, 2 - tranche securities, residuals, and other securities having unusual features are expressly prohibited. Transactions in options, futures, options on futures, margin buying and commodities are prohibited. Any other security not specifically Authorized in this document is expressly prohibited. 4. Maturities Maturity scheduling shall be timed according to anticipated need. Investment maturities for operating funds shall be scheduled to coincide with projected cash flow needs, taking into account large routine expenditures as well as considering sizable blocks of anticipated revenue. Investment of capital project funds shall be timed to meet contractors payments. Short Term versus Long Term Portfolio - Limitation on instruments, diversification and maturity scheduling shall depend upon whether the funds being invested are considered short term or long term funds. All funds shall be considered short term except those reserved for capital projects and prepayments funds being held for debt retirement. 5. Risk/Liquidity/Bidding 5 The primary goal of the investment policy is to maximize return on investment while minimizing risk to the investment. The Treasurer will diversify use of investment instruments to avoid incurring unreasonable risks inherent in overinvesting in specific instruments, individual financial institutions or maturities. The Treasurer's office shall maintain a listing of financial institutions which are approved by the State Treasury Board for investment purposes and which shall provide their most recent Consolidated Report of Condition. Periodically, these financial institutions must be examined and evaluated to determine their strength and creditworthiness. During the bid process the Treasurer may reject an investment with a higher yield when he feels it carries an element of risk. Speculative investments will not be allowed. Before the Treasurer invests 4rn any surplus funds, a competitive "bid" process with three or more financial institutions shall be conducted. If a specific maturity date is required, either for cash flow purposes or for conformance to maturity guidelines, bids will be requested for instruments which meet the maturity requirement. If no specific maturity is required, a market trend (yield curve) analysis will be conducted to determine which maturities would be most advantageous. 6. Reporting and Controls The Treasurer shall report at the end of each month to the Board of Supervisors the amount of money on deposit with each CL� 0 depository. The Treasurer shall establish a system of internal controls which shall be documented and reviewed with internal and independent auditors and meets the requirements of the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). The controls are designed to prevent losses of public funds due to fraud, error, misrepresentation, unanticipated market change or imprudent actions. B. Source of Investment Policy: 1. Current Management Practices The Treasurer shall develop and maintain written administrative procedures for the operation of the investment program. Each investment transaction shall seek to first ensure that capital losses are avoided, whether they be from securities defaults or erosion of market value. The County seeks to attain market rates of return on its investments, consistent with constraints imposed by its safety objectives, cash flow consideration and Virginia state laws that restrict the placement of public funds. An aggressive cash management program that maintains true zero balances in the County's checking accounts with temporary idle funds being invested overnight in repurchase agreements that are secured or collateralized by governmental securities as required by the Code of Virginia is also carried out by the Treasurer. Whenever possible funds held for future capital L- 40 7 projects (i.e., bond proceeds) shall be invested to produce enough income to offset increases in construction costs due to inflation. Diversification is required through the use of portfolio percentages. Safekeeping will be required using third -party safekeeping in an account in an institution designated as a primary agent. The Board of Supervisors will be given copies of the County's Investment Policies and Practices. All changes will be documented and copies sent to the Board. The Board should contact the Treasurer if they have any questions, recommendations, additions or deletions to the policies. The Treasurer will consider the recommendations and implement such recommendations which he deems in the best interest of the County. 2. Prudence Standards The standard of prudence to be applied by the Treasurer shall be the "prudent investor" rule, which states, "Investments shall be made with judgment and care, under circumstances then prevailing, which persons of prudence, discretion and intelligence exercised in the management of their own affairs, not for speculation, but for investment, considering the probable safety of their capital as well as the probable income to be derived." The prudent investor rule shall be applied in the context of managing the overall portfolio. The Treasurer, acting in accordance with written procedures 8 of the Code of Virginia, Sec. 2.1-329.1 and Sec. 58.1-3123 et. seq. and exercising due diligence, shall not be held personally responsible for a specific security's credit risk or market price changes provided that these deviations are reported immediately by the Treasurer and that reasonable and prudent action is taken to control adverse developments. Furthermore, in accordance with Sec. 58.1-3163 of the Code of Virginia, the Treasurer shall not be liable for loss of public money due to the default, failure or insolvency of a depository. 3. State Law The County shall limit investments to those allowed under the Virginia Security for Public Deposits Act, Sec. 2.1-359 through 2.1-370 and Investment of Public Funds as in Sec. 2.1-327 through 2.1-329, Code of Virginia. The Virginia Security for Public Deposits Act provides for a mutuality of responsibility involving a cross guarantee among all commercial banks holding public deposits. In the event of insolvency by a bank holding public deposits, any losses resulting from uncollateralized and uninsured public deposits will be paid by assessments against all other commercial banks holding public funds. The amount assessed against each bank will be based on the ratio that its average public deposits bears to the statewide average. In respect to the savings and loan associations and savings banks, however, there is no sharing of liability for total public L— (to funds on deposit. Instead, the savings and loan associations are required to pledge collateral equal to 100% of their public deposits, compared to 50% that is required of the banks. 4. Audit Requirements The Treasurer shall establish a system of internal controls which shall be documented in writing. Accurate and adequate records will be maintained by the Treasurer's Office. Such records will be subject to audit by the Internal Audit Department, as well as the independent auditors and the State Auditor of Public Accounts. Reporting and disclosure requirements will comply with all applicable regulations including the requirements of the Governmental Accounting Standards Board. 5. Concentration bank The Treasurer will move funds from other depository banks to a central point to maximize the availability of funds. The central point or primary bank will be the concentration bank which shall be determined by competitive bids. 6. Charges for Banking Services The cost of maintaining the account may be paid either by a compensating balance or by direct charges. If a compensating balance is used the Treasurer shall review with a bank official monthly an anlyzation of the County's account profitability to the bank. Considering interest rates at that time and the bank's average earnings allowance, the bank will determine the balances L 10 in the accounts (compensating balances) which will be required for the following month in order to cover the cost of processing the County's banking transactions. Copies of the result of these analyses will be maintained by the Treasurer. 7. Zero Balance Account (ZBA) The Treasurer will take full advantage of clearing time on County checks disbursed by maintaining true zero balances in the County's checking account. As checks are presented for payment, they are accumulated and a single offsetting credit is prepared to bring the account to a zero balance at the end of the banking day. This account is linked to the Master Concentration or deposit account against which the ZBA draws funds to pay the checks presented for payment. Temporarily idle funds will be invested overnight in repurchase agreements that are secured or collateralized by governmental securities as required by the Code of Virginia. The Treasurer will determine excess idle funds and invest them in longer term investments. 8. Diversification Diversification by Instrument: Percent of Portfolio U.S. Treasury Obligations 70% (bills, notes and bonds) 4 U.S. Government Agency Securities 70% and Instrumentalities of Government 11 Sponsored Corporations Bankers's Acceptance (BA's) 40% Repurchase Agreement (Repo's) Two or more nights 25% Repurchase Agreement (Repo's) overnight 70% Commercial Banks Certificate of Deposit (CD's) 100% Savings & Loan Associations Certificate of Deposits (CD's) 10% Commercial Paper 35% L-6 Local Government Investment Pool 75% Diversification by Financial Institution: Bankers' Acceptance (BA's) No more than 25% of the total portfolio with any one institution Repurchase Agreements (Repo's) No more than 20% of the total portfolio with any one institution Certificates of Deposits (CD's) Commercial Banks No more than 45% of the total portfolio with any one institution Certificates of Deposits (CD's) Savings and Loan Association. No more than $100,000 with any one institution. Local Government Investment Pool - State Pool No more than $15 million Commercial Paper No more than 25% of the total portfolio may be purchased through any one financial institution. Diversification of Funds to be invested in any one issue: NO limit- FDIC, FSLIC, Collateralized Certificates of Deposit 12 No limit- U.S. Treasuries and Agencies Maximum- 10% of total portfolio for any Bankers Acceptance and Commercial Paper issue II. Repurchase Agreements Definition A. Investing in Repurchase Agreements 1. The Instrument The repurchase agreements (Repo's) are an integral part of an investment program of state and local government. Their flexibility is unmatched by other short term money market instruments. They provide the investor an excellent cash management tool. The sale by a bank of a government security with a simultaneous agreement to repurchase the security at a later date can insure safety of public funds while securing money market rates of interest. The Repo is a contractual transaction between an investor and an issuing financial institution. The investor exchanges cash for temporary ownership or control of collateral securities, with an agreement between the parties that on a future date, the financial institution will repurchase the securities. The Treasurer will use a Master Repurchase Agreement (See Appendices) as a written contract to establish the County's rights in all transactions. A written contract will also be used with the independent third -party custodian. (See Appendices.) Customarily, the investor receives interest during the term L- �4 13 of the repurchase agreement, as agreed upon at the time of the investment transaction. The eligibility of repos depends on the manner in which the repo is structured. The Attorney General in an opinion written in July 1982 states "that a repurchase agreement which is secured or collateralized by governmental securities which qualify under Sec.2.1-328 is a legally authorized investment." The General Assembly during the 1985 session amended Sec. 2.1-328.5 and added Sec. 2.1-328.8. This legislation authorizes the investment of public funds in overnight, term and open repurchase agreements which are collateralized with securities that are approved for direct investment. 2. Types of Repurchase Agreements An overnight repo is one which is written for one day, as its name implies. These are popular with cash managers seeking to invest funds overnight to meet specific cash needs on the next day or to combine assets with other investments and incoming cash in larger denominations for a longer maturity in another instrument. Interest rates tend to be quoted in relationship to the Fed funds rate, which is the interbank lending rate for bank reserves. Term repos are written for a specific time period of more than one day. The County uses term repos usually for maturities for less than 14 days, particularly when bank regulations require jumbo CDs to be written for at least 14 days with some having 30 - day requirements. Collateral is adjusted daily to protect the 14 investor. Open repos are written without a specific maturity. Either party may end the transaction on a future date and the amount invested can be changed on a daily basis. Open repos are based upon a rate that keys off Fed funds or T-bill yields. 3. Know With Whom You Are Investing The Treasurer must exercise special caution selecting parties to conduct repurchase transactions with and be able to identify the parties acting as principals to the transactions. A written master repurchase agreement is executed between the County, the bank and the third party collateral agent. It is the policy of the County to concentrate its investment efforts to banks located in the State of Virginia which are under the Virginia statutes for public funds and all banks must be approved depositories by the State Treasury Board. 4. Collateral Collateral is the repo's underlying security. Repos are written against specific government securities as authorized by law. The best collateral from the investor's standpoint is short-term U.S. Treasury bills which are liquid and not subject to serve price changes. 5. Delivery of Collateral As a matter of policy, the County must take delivery of the securities purchased through the agreement if the term of the agreement is more than four (4) days. These investment securities may be held by the County or placed in a third party custodial L 4t) 15 account for safekeeping. If the term is less than four (4) days, such as the overnight repo when third party safekeeping is not required, the securities may be held in safekeeping by the bank, but must be held for the account of the County. The repo must be written against specific government securities as authorized under Sec. 2.1-328. When entering a repurchase agreement where delivery is not required, the County shall obtain a safekeeping receipt for the specific securities purchased. Pledged securities under the repurchase agreement must be based on market value, not face value. 6. Risk Risk is significantly reduced by delivery of underlying securities through physical delivery to a third party custodian. Repos shall not exceed 25% of the total investment in the County's investment portfolio on any one day and no more than 15% with any one institution. Losses can be limited in doing repos, if not avoided entirely, by following these four basic rules: (1) operate under the terms of a clearly specified and executed master repurchase agreement with Commercial Virginia Banks, (2) properly assess counterparties including their corporate structure and capital strength, (3) use appropriate procedures for obtaining control of securities, and (4) evaluate securities appropriately and monitor them regularly, making margin calls when necessary. III. Prime Bankers' Acceptances Definition: WA This instrument as defined by the Government Finance Officers Association, Committee on Cash Management in its June 1984 publication Model Investment Legislation is as follows: "Bankers' acceptances typically are created from a letter of credit in a foreign trade transaction. For example, a U.S. corporation planning to import goods from abroad requests that its bank issue a letter of credit on its behalf in favor of the foreign supplier.This letter allows the foreign vendor to draw a draft on the importer's U.S. bank for payment of the merchandise. Upon receipt of this letter and draft, the supplier ships the goods and presents the draft at its bank for discounting, allowing the supplier to receive immediate payment for the shipment. The foreign bank then forwards the draft to its U.S. correspondent. At this point, the draft is stamped "accepted", with the U.S. bank incurring an obligation to pay the draft (now a bankers' acceptance) at maturity. The accepting domestic bank may buy the acceptance, earning the discount between the purchase price and face amount to be reimbursed by the U.S. importer. On the other hand, the acceptance may be sold to a third party, freeing the bank of all but the contingent liability, for which it collects a small fee. In this case the acceptance--- secured by the bank, the goods themselves and the importer ---becomes a money market instrument. In 69 years of use in the United States, the bankers' acceptance has experienced no known principal loss to investors. There have been instances of counterfeit and fraudulent 17 acceptances. Government investors are advised to seek bankers' acceptance from money center banks to insure a secondary marketability unless a lesser known local institution offers a yield premium. Maturities range from 30 to 180 days." As a matter of policy, one of the banks should be a Virginia bank and the County should only purchase bankers' acceptances of banks that have a rating of no lower than B/C as assigned by Keefe Bruyette or the top local banks. The maximum percentage of funds to be invested in any one issue shall not exceed five (5) percent of the total portfolio. These securities will be held by the County's third party custodial agent in the County's name. IV. Prime Quality Commercial Paper Definition Commercial paper has a history that extends back to colonial times, prior to the existence of a banking system in America. The precursor of commercial paper was the domestic bill of exchange, which was used to finance trade as early as the beginning of the eighteenth century. Bills of exchange allowed the safe and convenient transfer of funds and provided a short- term loan between the -time of purchase and payment for goods. As financial intermediation evolved, banks and paper brokers began discounting paper. The supply of negotiable paper was held by commercial banks or by entrepreneurs investing surplus funds. Commercial paper is a short term unsecured promissory note that is generally sold by large corporations. In recent years 11 18 commercial paper has attracted much attention because of its rapid growth and its use as an alternative to short-term bank loans. The principal issuers of commercial paper include finance companies, nonfinancial companies and bank holding companies. These issuers participate in the market for different reasons and in different ways. Finance companies raise funds on a more -or -less continuous basis in the commercial paper sales in part to support their consumer and business lending. These commercial paper sales in part provide interim financing between issues of long-term debentures. Non-financial companies issue commercial paper at less frequent intervals than do finance companies. These firms issue paper to meet their funding requirements for short-term or seasonal expenditures such as inventories, payrolls and tax liabilities. Bank holding companies use the commercial paper market to finance primarily banking related activities such as leasing, mortgage banking, and consumer finance. The firms issuing paper obtain rating from at least one of three services, and most obtain two ratings. In most cases, insurers bank their paper one hundred percent with lines of credit from commercial banks. Present day investors in commercial paper include money center banks, non-financial firms, investment firms, state and local governments, private pension funds, foundations and individuals. The County's policy is to invest only in "prime quality" commercial paper, with a maturity of two hundred seventy days or 19 less, or issuing corporations organized under the laws of the United States, or any state thereof including paper issued by banks and bank holding companies. "Prime quality" shall be as rated by the Moody's Investors Service, Inc. within its ratings of prime 1 or prime 2 or by Standard and Poor's, Inc. within its ratings of A-1 or A-2 or by Fitch Investors Service within its ratings of F-1 and F-2. The maximum percentage of funds to be invested in any one issue shall not exceed five (5) percent of the total portfolio. These securities will be held by the County's third party custodial agent in the County's name. It shall be the county's policy to purchase only Al - P1 paper., Local Government Investment Pool Act Operated Directly By State Treasurer A. The Act and its Purpose 1. Introduction The "Investment of Public Funds and Local Government Investment Pool Act" became effective January 1, 1981 and provides for a local government investment pool which will produce additional revenues for localities on short-term investments. The pooling of funds enables governmental entities to avail themselves of the economics of large-scale investing as well as active, professional management of funds by the State Treasurer's investment staff. As a member of the pool, governmental entities are able to 20 take advantage of the investment facilities of the Commonwealth. Pooled funds are invested in accordance with Treasury Board investment guidelines for the Commonwealth's general fund monies. This encompasses third -party delivery of repo collateral and other professional safekeeping arrangements. 2. Investment Strategies Investments will be made in conformity with Sec. 2.1-234-4 of the Act. There is a minimum participation of $5,000.00. The minimum period for investment is one day. Rates of return vary. Once the account is established, no minimum balance is required. Additional investments can be made in minimum $1,000 increments. The pool provides liquidity to the investor with one -day notice of deposit or withdrawal of funds. Instructions are to be called to the Department of Treasury at (804) 225-3166 before 4:00 p.m. on the business day prior to the actual transfer of funds. 3. Income Earnings Accumulated income will be credited to each participant's account monthly. Each locality will receive a monthly report which will contain the following information: Average investment balance Average yield Gross investment credit Administrative expenses Net Investment Credit Changes in participation made during the preceding month 4. Reserve for losses A A -62795-4.i ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER L — 5 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: June 27, 1995 AGENDA IT .M• Request for Acceptance and Appropriation of the Community Improvement Grant #94-45S to the Capital Projects Fund. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' COMMENTS: 7�/1 L SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Department of Housing and Community Development of the Commonwealth of Virginia has awarded the County of Roanoke a $150,000 Community Improvement Grant for the construction and pavement of a 3,192 S.Y.access road to include 1,695 L.F. of curb and gutter for Valley Tech Park. The Board recognized Congressman Boucher's efforts in securing the grant during the September 27, 1994 Board meeting. Oficial notification from the Department of Housing and Community Development was dated April 20, 1995. This action is to officially receive and appropriate the $150,000 to the Capital Projects Fund for Valley Tech Park. STAFF RECOM ENDATION• Staff recommends acceptance and appropriation of the Community Improvement Grant #94-45S to the Capital Projects Fund. Respectfully s ubTitted, Approved by, Paul E. Grice Elmer C. Hodge ��" Assistant Director of Finance County Administrator m:\fmance\common\board\ June 21, 1995 Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) J-5 -------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Motion by: Motion by Edward G. No Yes Abs Kohinke to approve Eddy x Johnson x Kohinke x Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance mAfimwe\common\board\ June 21, 1995 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 27, 1995 RESOLUTION 62795-5 CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Certification Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None ABSENT: None A COPY TESTE: /J'L�c-t1�Cv �-�• Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk cc: File Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Executive Session AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 27, 1995 RESOLUTION 62795-6 APPROVAL AND ADOPTION OF THE ALLOCATION OF FUNDING FOR THE SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM SI% -YEAR CONSTRUCTION PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 1995-1996 WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on June 27, 1995, to receive comments on the allocation of funding for the Secondary Road System Six -Year Construction Plan for Fiscal Year 1995-1996; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors does hereby approve the allocation of funds for the Secondary Road System Six Year Construction Plan for Roanoke County for Fiscal Year 1995-1996 as shown on the attached construction budget. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution duly attested be forthwith forwarded to the Virginia Department of Transportation Salem Residency Office by the Clerk to the Board. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: &t44,— Brenda J. Ho on, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Virginia Department of Transportation Roanoke County Secondary System Construction Budget Fiscal Year 1995-96 County Wide Incidental B.aet Items Allocation Rural Additions $160,920 Pipe Installation - Private Entrances $70,000 Subdivision Plan Review $5,000 Pavement Striping $20,000 Regular Numbered Projects $255,920 ENCLOSURE 3 0613-080-226,C501 $350,000 Fund Construction 0615-080-230,C501 $40,000 Fund Deficit 1658-080-223,C501 $30,000 Fund Construction 1658-080-223,13667 $90,000 Fund Construction 0668-080-229,C501 $750,000 Fund Construction 0636-080-282,C501 $190,000 Fund Construction 0633-080-237,C501 $152,000 Fund Construction 0720-080-281,C501 $80,000 Fund Construction 0601-080-233,C501 $900,000 Fund R/W & Construction 0601-080-233,13677 $100,000 Fund PE & Construction 1835-080-288,C501 $50,000 Fund Construction 1835-080-288,8675 $40,000 Fund Construction 1861-080-289,C501 $30,000 Fund Construction 1861-080-289,8676 $38,850 Fund- Construction 0628-080-232,C501 $18,214 Fund R/W 0670-080-284,M501 $20,000 Fund PE & R/W 1867-080-295,C501 $20,000 Fund PE 1867-080-295,8678 $25,000 Fund PE Unpaved Road Projects 0669-080-P83,N501 $2,924,064 $38,427 $38,427 Total Allocation = $3,218,411 S_ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 27, 1995 ORDINANCE 62795-7 VACATING AND CLOSING AN UNIMPROVED PORTION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY KNOWN AS OCALA DRIVE IN THE SUN VALLEY SUBDIVISION WHEREAS, Glenn J. and Mary Ann Hammerand and Robert A. and Frances E. Vessey, the petitioners, are the owners of two parcels of land, more particularly described as Lot 13, Block 8, Section 2 and Lot 8, Block 2, Section 2, of Sun Valley Subdivision, as shown on that certain plat of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Plat Book 4, Page 63; and, WHEREAS, the petitioners have requested that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, vacate and close Ocala Drive, which is an unimproved right-of-way, measuring fifty feet (501) in width and approximately one hundred thirty feet (1301) in length, lying between the above -referenced lots as shown on said plat; and, WHEREAS, §15.1-482 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, requires that such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by §15.1-431 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and the first reading of this ordinance was held on June 13, 1995; and the public hearing and second reading of this ordinance was held on June 27, 1995. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: HI 1. That an unimproved portion of right-of-way, situate in the Hollins Magisterial District and known as Ocala Drive, being approximately 50' x 1301, as shown on the plat of Sun Valley Subdivision, recorded in Plat Book 4, Page 63, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to Section 15.1-482(b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, subject to the following conditions: a. That all costs and expenses associated herewith, including but not limited to, publication costs, survey costs and recordation of documents, shall be the responsibility of the petitioners; and, b. That a public utility easement, fifteen feet (151) in width, is hereby reserved and retained along the western subdivision boundary in order to connect the existing public utility easements on each side of Ocala Drive. C. That the right to provide maintenance to the existing public utility facilities located within the vacated area is reserved and retained unto C & P Telephone Company of Virginia, its successors or assigns, in accordance with §15.1-483 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. d. That the vacated area of land shall be added and combined, by deed or by plat, to the adjoining properties owned by the petitioners and shall be in compliance with the Roanoke County Subdivision Ordinance, and other applicable laws and regulations. _ 2. That the Department of Engineering and Inspections shall record a certified copy of this ordinance with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, and the recordation costs shall be payable by the petitioners. 3. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in N conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Ho on, Deputy Clerk cc: File Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JUNE 27, 1995 ORDINANCE 62795-8 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A .84 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 5407 PETERS CREEK ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 26.20-5-7) IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF SUSAN CAROL ROLFE AND MARK REINHARDT WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on May 23, 1995, and the second reading and public hearing were held June 27, 1995; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on June 6, 1995; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing .84 acre, as described herein, and located at 5407 Peters Creek Road, (Tax Map Number 26.20-5-7) in the Hollins Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of C-1, Office District, to the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Susan Carol Rolfe and Mark Reinhardt. 3. That the owner has voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: The following uses will not be conducted on the property: 1 General and family restaurants; hospital; auto repair; funeral home. 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at an old iron pin at the intersection of the south side of Peters Creek Road with the east side of Woodhaven Road, said point being corner to the property of Montague - Betts Company, Inc.; thence leaving said point of beginning and following the southerly side of Peters Creek Road and property herein described, N. 39 deg. 57' 00" E. 114.53 feet to point number 1A; thence with a new line through the property of Montague -Betts Company, Inc., S. 56 deg. 44' 17" E. 160.21 feet to point 4A on the line of the Mark Steven Reinhardt property; thence with the Reinhardt property and the property herein described, S. 33 deg. 47' 26" W. 29.68 feet to point number 5; thence continuing between the Reinhardt property and the property herein described, S. 15 deg. 00' 00" W. 113.00 feet to point number 6 on the line of property of The Branch Group, Inc.; then with The Branch Group, Inc. and the property herein described, S. 61 deg. 56' 00" W. 135.00 feet to a point on the east of Woodhaven Road; thence with Woodhaven Road and the property herein described, N. 17 deg. O1' 00" W. 81.51 feet to point number 8; thence continuing with Woodhaven Road and the property herein described, N. 09 deg. 30' 00" W. 84.96 feet to point number 9; thence continuing with Woodhaven Road, N. 07 deg. 34' 00" W. 35.98 feet to the Point of Beginning, and being designated Parcel B and containing .84 acre and being shown on proposed subdivision for Montague -Betts Company, Inc. of a 1.32 acre tract and prepared by T. P. Parker & Son, Engineers, Surveyors and Planners, dated October 27, 1994. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix 2 NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Aa.z' 'z�, 0 kLt.�� renda J. Kolton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 3 t{ � , '�I 11 J1 I;/ 7 L sus 4 0 777 0 PAA T;)6, NORTH r n .0 9 3 s�'l ak ► it `v r ; v Gou�1 aid p• 1 ��0ke Rca�°`'�t••k Gid `off pot•n e,tne CITY w� Ro0 DEPART,,= OF PUNjNT', SUSAN ROLFE & MARK RE I NHARDT AND ZONING C-1 TO c-2 • TAX R 26.20-5-7 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 27, 1995 ORDINANCE 62795-9 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO SHELOR INC. TO OPERATE A USED CAR LOT LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF WILLIAMSON ROAD 400 FEET NORTH OF ITS INTERSECTION WITH PLYMOUTH DRIVE (TAX PARCEL 27.18-1-5.2), HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, Shelor Inc. has filed a petition to allow the operation of a used car lot located on the west side of Williamson Road 400 feet north of its intersection with Plymouth Drive in the Hollins Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on June 6, 1995; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on May 23, 1995; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on June 27, 1995. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to allow the operation of a used car lot located on the west side of Williamson Road 400 feet north of its intersection with Plymouth Drive in the Hollins Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.1-456 (b) of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and hereby grants a Special Use Permit to Shelor Inc. to allow said use with the following condition: 1 (1) Vehicular access for the proposed use will be from the existing used automobile dealership at 6718 Williamson Road. Any future uses of the property, not associated with the existing use, will require VDOT approval for an entrance permit. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: Supervisor Eddy A COPY TESTE: Q. kLL427-- Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 2 VICINITY-� MAP 117) a R ING1 4ykl1 I NJNCr AAF-TS`� ft Fnw.♦s.✓ rvr .K r�.l. C S )'Ear. a 1, • 7s '" • Drs.. f 1 earn 1 = .,.. t I= rfrt1. • _ 7 It rrea . . Its.. ,. • � ISJri � Ic J rw1 .^ SL Al moron t 'Al r feu S I M • 4 ' r♦Y (—�` ♦la 3 f rew S 7 r M M 1 vu ♦1 11 10 ' • irk 5 No = 1 l W. '• I I r 1 roes J ... E--& .+ r.a Itst a ~I 7 Ya i ♦ 1 � 40 ' I ', ♦lad " e I♦V � r111 •••�♦ 1 ' � li l.r � R r.r ' i Ite Ne M i »♦ t • � row to � ` � � • ~tel Sl• rrl / i ♦ .rue? 1 ` rtf Bei J I N .t.D 3 Y'" 0 1I Z r �1 3 r.....♦r rls I S E �, r/ is DEPARTHwr OF PI,�lING SHELOR INC. AND ZONING SPECIAL USE PERMIT TAX MAP # 27.18-1-5.2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 27, 1995 ORDINANCE 62795-10 AMENDING AND REENACTING ORDINANCE 82592-12, THE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR ROANOKE COUNTY, BY THE ADOPTION OF CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO SAID ORDINANCE RELATING TO MANUFACTURED HOMES WHEREAS, Roanoke County adopted zoning provisions in 1986 which permitted manufactured homes throughout the County on individual lots under certain specific design requirements and established provisions for accessory manufactured homes, emergency manufactured homes and manufactured home parks and subdivisions; and WHEREAS, these provisions were proclaimed to be "innovative" by the Virginia Manufactured Housing Association and cited as a model ordinance to be considered by other jurisdictions; and WHEREAS, the legislature amended Section 15.1-486.3 of the Code of Virginia in 1990 to mandate that manufactured homes of 19 feet wide be allowed in all agricultural districts or districts where the dominant use is agricultural or forestry, and further amended this Section in 1995 by deleting the reference to 19 feet in width; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at their work sessions on April 18, 1995 and May 16, 1995, discussed various options for amending the County Zoning Ordinance to implement the changes mandated by the amendments to the Code of Virginia; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that the AG -3 and AG -1 zoning districts consist of the only districts where the dominant use is agriculture or 1 forestry; and WHEREAS, the Commission has further determined that the AR district is primarily a rural residential district based on the districts intent, character, location and distribution of lot sizes: and WHEREAS, the Commission has also determined that the character of planned residential subdivisions are such that they do not constitute areas where the dominant use is agriculture and forestry; and WHEREAS, after a public hearing on June 6, 1995, the Planning Commission recommended that the Proposed Amendments to the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance for Manufactured Homes be adopted in order to comply with the above mentioned amendments to the Code of Virginia; and WHEREAS, on August 25, 1992, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, adopted Ordinance 82592-12 which enacted a new zoning ordinance for Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, since the adoption of the new zoning ordinance the need for the adoption of several amendments have been identified; and WHEREAS, in the interest of public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice, the Board of Supervisors hereby amends certain provisions of the Zoning Ordinance for Roanoke County; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law, and that the first reading of this ordinance was held on May 23, 1995, and the second reading and public hearing was held on June 27, 1995. 2 BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the Zoning Ordinance for Roanoke County, adopted on August 25, 1992, be, and hereby is amended and reenacted, as follows: PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE ROANOKE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE FOR MANUFACTURED HOMES ARTICLE I GENERAL PROVISIONS Sec. 30-23-2 Nonconforming Uses of Buildings, Structures or Land (H) Notwithstanding (A) through (G) above, a nonconforming manufactured home existing on an individual lot of record that has served as an active dwelling for at least six months may be replaced with cti>manufactured home provided: 1. The replacement home is installed on the lot within four months of the removal of the home to be replaced, and; 3 2. The replacement home is installed in approximately the same location on the lot, and is installed to comply with the setback regulations for principal structures, and; 3. The installation of the replacement home complies with the Use and Design standards for manufactured homes contained in Section 30-82-9 iH--b., and e : ARTICLE II DEFINITIONS AND USE TYPES SEC. 30-28 DEFINITIONS MANUFACTURED HOME - A structure, transportable in one or more sections, which in the traveling mode is 8 body feet or more in width or 40 body feet or more in length, or, when erected on site, is 320 or more square feet, and which is built on a permanent chassis and designed to be used as a dwelling with or without a permanent foundation. A manufactured home shall contain one dwelling unit. Some manufactured homes are also referred to as mobile homes. PLANNED RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION - A development>>'i�3t` ;t'stl<sid'[iQrt constructed on a tract of at le ast five acres, 4 planned and developed as an integral residential neighborhood unit. The subdivision shall consist of five or more lots of five acres or less, each lot designed and intended for the placement of a residential dwelling. SEC. 30-29 USE TYPES; GENERALLY Sec. 30-29-2 Residential Use Types MANUFACTURED HOME, ACCESSORY - A Class B manufactured home that is subordinate to a single family dwelling n a single lot and meets the additional criteria contained in Section 30-82-51. rLl�l-11LJ1,l I�t�t�\���1�.\-l1'� 1,-.-\�.-.-�.-f� I�-I: - ���,-\->__A�J•� -�-- - 5 1 1rall 1 1 MANUFACTURED HOME, EMERGENCY - A Glass -B manufactured home used temporarily for the period of reconstruction or replacement of an uninhabitable dwelling lost or destroyed by fire, flood, or other act of nature, or used temporarily as housing relief to victims of a federally declared disaster in accordance with Section 30-82-8. MANUFACTURED HOME SUBDIVISION - A five acre or larger community, --of manufactured home dwellings with lots that are subdivided for individual ownership. MANUFACTURED HOME PARK - A five acre or larger tract of land intended to accommodate a manufactured home community of multiple spaces for lease or condominium ownership. A manufactured home park is also referred to as a N mobile home park. ARTICLE III - DISTRICT REGULATIONS SEC. 30-32 AG -3 AGRICULTURAL/RURAL PRESERVE DISTRICT Sec. 30-32-2 Permitted Uses (A) 2. Residential Uses Accessory Apartment * Home Occupation, Type I and Type II * Kennel, Private * Manufactured Home, Accessory * Manufactured Home, Emergency * Residential Human Care Facility Single Family Dwelling, Detached SEC. 30-33 AGA AGRICULTURAL/RURAL LOW DENSITY DISTRICT Sec. 30-33-2 Permitted Uses (A) 2. Residential Uses Accessory Apartment * Home Occupation, Type I and Type II * Kennel, Private * Manufactured Home, Accessory * Manufactured Home, Emergency * Residential Human Care Facility Single Family Dwelling, Detached SEC. 30-34 AR AGRICULTURAL/RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Sec. 30-34-1 Purpose (A) These areas are generally characterized by very low density residential and institutional uses mixed with1tl:t>:...:eli�tf#1tcl1 agricultural uses, forest land and open space outside the urban service area. These areas provide an opportunity for rural living in convenient proximity to urban services and employment. Agricultural uses should be encouraged to be maintained whole RGR faFM FesideRtS should FeGGgnize that they are IGGated iR an 1e11+6y. Over time, however, these areas are expected to become increasingly residential in character, with residential development becoming the dominant use over agricultural and more rural type uses. The purpose of this district, consistent with the Rural Village land use category in the Comprehensive Plan, is to maintain these areas essentially in their rural state, consistent with the level of services anticipated by the County. These areas are generally suitable for low density residential development and other compatible land uses. Sec. 30-34-2 Permitted Uses (A) 1. Agricultural and Forestry Uses Agriculture * Fann €mpfeyee #eesing * Forestry Operations * Stable, Private * Stable, Commercial * Wayside Stand * 10 2. Residential Uses Accessory Apartment * Home Occupation, Type I * Kennel, Private * Manufa r. H6N ............................................................... Manufactured Home, Emergency * Residential Human Care Facility Single Family Dwelling, Detached SEC. 30-36 AV VILLAGE CENTER DISTRICT Sec. 30-36-2 Permitted Uses (A) 2. Residential Uses Accessory Apartment * Home Beauty/Barber Salon * Home Occupation, Type I * Kennels, Private * 11 Manufactured Home, Emergency * Residential Human Care Facility Single Family Dwelling, Attached * Single Family Dwelling, Detached Two Family Dwelling * SEC. 30-41 R-1 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Sec. 30-41-2 Permitted Uses (A) 1. Residential Uses Home Occupation, Type I * Manufactured Home, Emergency * Residential Human Care Facility Single Family Dwelling, Detached (For Zero Lot Line Option - *) Single Family Dwelling, Attached * SEC. 30-42 R-2 MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT 12 Sec. 30-42-2 Permitted Uses (A) 1. Residential Uses Accessory Apartment * Home Occupation, Type I * Kennel, Private * 1[afabcrrac3i Manufactured Home, Emergency * Residential Human Care Facility Single Family Dwelling, Attached * Single Family Dwelling, Detached (For Zero Lot Line Option - *) Two Family Dwelling * SEC. 30-45 R-3 MEDIUM DENSITY MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Sec. 30-45-2 Permitted Uses (A) 1. Residential Uses Accessory Apartment * 13 Home Occupation, Type I * I,T, Manufactured Home, Emergency Multi -family Dwelling * Residential Human Care Facility Single Family Dwelling, Attached * Single Family Dwelling, Detached (For Zero Lot Line Option - *) Townhouse * Two Family Dwelling * SEC. 30-46 R-4 HIGH DENSITY MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Sec. 30-46-2 Permitted Uses (A) 1. Residential Uses Accessory Apartment * Home Occupation, Type I * M4aaufaGWFed uene, Glass Manufactured Home, Emergency * 14 Multi -family Dwelling * Residential Human Care Facility Single Family Dwelling, Attached * Single Family Dwelling, Detached (For Zero Lot Line Option - *) Townhouse * Two Family Dwelling * 15 ARTICLE IV USE AND DESIGN STANDARDS SEC. 30-81 AGRICULTURAL AND FORESTRY USES Sec. 30-81-3 Farm Employee Housing (A) General standards: 1. A single family dwelling, Class A MaRufaGtWed Heme eF Aii.iiiAccessory Manufactured Home, shall be permitted as an accessory use to an agricultural use exclusively for a farm employee, and his/her familyi irac.Glass A and AGGG6GeFyManufaGtuFed Homes shall meet the requirements contained r1efa1#3. SEC. 30-82 RESIDENTIAL USES > ,> an uf mro-- Home A d:>::: s.: rore� a;v�a :::;a : dabt >ho> �:: ' ::> Me WR +�::::::::::::: �t�::::: ��.: �ff..0�..........�........t�s..n ......t�4r�.:.f+�t ....::::.....................:....:.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::9....:.f�::.::::::::.:.:::. ...........................................................................................................:. .; .:...«....: ..:..:...:.:...,....::..:.....«.......................:.... , ......... <.. ,;....:.... . o k�a:<:as : <:> ....................: tri ::o .:ter.: �. r4rre:.: :................................P.. I. lrcli#r:grulfural T.: flres .................wit rnntra, re.. ca:rr,:enens=:<onsistenf nitie:::c�de::>:<`Cs:::: . t,st.asc roved under:>crt€r �esr 16 .i:<: :t^?iiiiiii:.ii: ::•i}iiii;.}.•n:.iiiiii?::: :.i:<.: i'+iii?iliiii:: is iiii}>iii}i:.i::.::�i••:•:iKF:ii:^i::..iiiiiiiii:<•ii}i :i4:•%i.iii:ii}: ;:LL•i:•i':i?4:•'•i:^i:4i: i:<if'F:O:�:•i:•kOii:•i}i:• 1>>>''irafior:o..riin�cfctc>czm �r>a: an : d::.: is ::.:I.......s...:: rear..centi: susron:. r nU:Sure, p. �xtsfed:>"ii s<>> aUri "<' ric r t ... r > 8 ::::.. : .i:# .i:.i:.ii:i::.::.:::. .i:.:......i:.::.i.i... i...:...i....ii::.;:.>:.:.i<:'.i:.i::.. i....i.::.:::.::.>:.......i:.::.i:.:.:........ i:..:.:.:.:.i...:.i:::.::.::.::.::. :::;.:.::< 1986, nd tal be flow. to e r o ata ar r r t ai r :< taaob le >:>::::>:::»:: :::;:::::;::<;.:::.:>;:i......;.ii::;.:::::;i:ii;;::.;i; iii iii .i:::.i;i .;;;i:.i iii:<.:: :<.;:::..;:. !:;:i>::iiI., In :;i.£' �COuIfCi$ 4 ..il 1grCt4tt� 1 ..:.............. QnaEnen;::«:<:of<tts::>Qr�:nancs: >< ««>< :: ;i:;:::<:.>::i::.i:::��;:.>;.:: .:.:.:::;;.:.«.;::<:ii:>.> .::.:.:,::.:::.::.>:.:::.:.:,;.::., >:;.::.:' ,: >::i:.:.:....:.:„,. ....... :: �:::.;:.::.ii:.:::::>:.::.::: �<:: »::<:i:.:::.>:.::ir k.::i::x �<,ii:::.:.:.::.:.::::.i::.:;';:.:,.:.;:.: .: :>: >::»»>::: "[`fie martfactu�d hams s�i f�avteserrtb wh�� r�rn�r� .... ......1:.:� 17 ................. ................ ur., ........... :.:cecared. . . . ...... p r ... .... R:W-:-:# ........... . ........................................i.t... O....n...g... I'd.Ards ihtie j n.d...". .'......B........e"..".m.'-........e.".....n..".... '.t..i.. .........-...p...s.....H......... .b..... .... .. ndiv da ... . .................. ................. .................................................... .. . . .. ... . .. 1. ..... ... ....... .. . . . .................. ................................. j'av -a J. giu :qlo ...... ..... .... m . M - pm' :gh ............. ... ..... . .......... 0.: [MMe.7 q sta b site ow n ty ...... used ... .. ........... . . ................ Ldp .............. ...... 2-MMIMUM X X . h u n*..' i q..." ... . .... . ..... ... ............... . ..... . ............ ... .. . .... f.".' ... .. ........ stili h ................... ... .... ..... ........... ......... ....d........ .6 ...v ............. ................... .. ..*...*...*a.*.*.'.'. *.*".t'.*ed...'.. 4a ! ,h. as,.. *m .t'..,n.otI " Ii it .. ASS man ........................ ...... . ..... r enclose:Tstorage ............ ....... A a X e. y ::. a .......... ...... G.*..* story'" ......... -- -- a. fi ig Gustemarily used GR a site built dwelling, suGh as but net limited te lap 19 MIT"MIM-WM shingles,6. The FnaRufaratuFed home shall have a 2.6" in 12" ' * I itGh Feet OF wood shak M_ .• �.._.�- - -..._�-.-�=..-�.���_,:.'_=.�..=.,:.�=_,ems-.tee.-=�--•-=—=.=._.,=.::.=.:., Sec. 30-82-6fi Manufactured Homes, Accessory (A) Intent - These regulations are adopted in recognition that certain families would benefit from living arrangements that allowed family members to reside in close proximity to each other but in separate dwelling units on the same lot. Also recognized in these provisions is the need for affordable housing alternatives for farm employees on bona -fide farm operations. 20 (B) General standards: 1. The accessory manufactured home shall be located on the same lot as a principal dwelling. This principal dwelling must be a single family dwelling ............... '18. ceu o :>. >:1T'Ec` riu actu ::e . : [. r..: d.: hrr�s.:shad..ae>eaa»fan>'>Itsef;in>wtthx 2. The accessory manufactured home shall only be occupied by: a. A person or persons immediately related to the person or family in the principal dwelling. For the purposes of this Section, immediately related shall be any person or persons who are natural or legally defined offspring, parent, or grandparent of the owner of the principal dwelling; OR, b. A farm employee and his/her family in accordance with the provisions for farm employee housing contained elsewhere in this Aisle tt1. 2-4-. No accessory manufactured home shall be allowed within any Planned Residential Subdivision, as defined in Article II of this Ordinance. 21 4. The accessory manufactured home and the principal dwelling shall be located on the same lot of record. The lot of record must l`1'�d't�`i�3 .......................... .......................... .......................... We'd :yii::1'iiY,.! ......:; ';ii:!::::i :y:i.:.i:ti::y' i:j:i::i': ' i::i:;:K:: j;ii:; iY: ' i'.i\y?iiiiiJ:::'.ii' iii:i:':.i:'•iiiii:ipii'.ii:ii .i mXmr€ tot aize #arthe dRstr�c# art which +#<�hay st - b8. The accessory manufactured home must be located behind the building line of the principal dwelling and shall meet the minimum side and rear yard setback requirements for principal structures in the district in which it is located. 6`. The accessory manufactured home shall be anchored. and stabilized.aC r in accordance with the provisions of the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code. ORGe installed, it must be Gempletely skiFted with a nen (C) Special Application Procedures: 1. Persons interested in obtaining a permit to install an accessory manufactured home shall make application to the Administrator, who shall have the authority to review and decide upon all applications. 2. In considering any application for an accessory manufactured home the Pya Administrator shall visit the proposed site to view the proposed location and the character of the surrounding area. In making a determination to issue or deny any application the Administrator shall consider all of the following factors: a. The purposes of the zoning ordinance outlined in Section 30-3. b. The effect of the proposed accessory manufactured home on the conservation of surrounding properties and their values, and its effect on the existing use and character of the property. C. The general land use compatibility of the accessory manufactured home in relation to surrounding properties. 3. If the Administrator determines that the proposal does not conform to any of the location, use or design standards contained in the above, the Administrator shall deny the application and notify the applicant in writing. Any such denial may be appealed to the Board of Zoning Appeals. 4. If the Administrator determines that the proposal conforms to the provisions of this Section, the Administrator shall mail a first class letter to all adjacent property owners notifying each owner of the County's intent to issue a 23 permit for the accessory manufactured home. All parties shall be given 15 days from the date of the notice to formally object in writing to the issuance of the permit. If an objection is filed, it shall be considered an appeal of the decision of the Administrator, and shall be considered by the Board of Zoning Appeals. The person filing the appeal shall be responsible for all required application and legal ad costs. 5. If no interested party objects within fifteen days of the date of the notice to the adjacent property owners, the administrator may approve the accessory manufactured home permit. ILI- - -P. 24 24 pafk. Sec. 30-82-8 Manufactured Home, Emergency (B) General standards: ::::::::::.::.>:.>:.::::.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::�::.: .::.::.:.:::::::::::. �:::. �:::::::::::::::::::::::::: �.: s�a11.: ��:>:1�s�;;:i:ha€�.:.:�:�::�ee�.: in.:�►rE�:t�. . The emergency manufactured home shall meet all setback and yard requirements for the district in which it is located. It shall be anchored and stabilized in accordance with the provisions of the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code. 4. The emergency manufactured home must be removed as soon as 25 reconstruction or replacement of the uninhabitable dwelling is complete, or within a 12 month period of its placement on the site, whichever is sooner. A one time extension of up to 6 additional months may be granted by the Administrator if substantial reconstruction of the destroyed dwelling has occurred, and work has, and is continuing to progress. A final certificate of zoning compliance for the reconstructed dwelling shall not be issued until the emergency manufactured home is removed from the site. Sec. 30-82-9 Manufactured Home Park (A) General standards: (L) In Manufactured home parks established prior to June 1, 1986, existing manufactured homes may be replaced with a -Glass -B Manufactured Home, 9F a consistent with Section 30-82<(x provided all of the following standards are met: a. The manufactured home meets the side and rear yard setback for accessory structures, as specified in the underlying zoning district, from the property line of the park; b. The manufactured home is anchored ftjin accordance with the provisions of the Virginia Statewide Uniform Building Code; and, Sec. 30-82-10 Manufactured Housing Subdivision (A) General standards: 2. Use limitations: Areas designated on the approved preliminary plan as a manufactured housing subdivision shall be limited t manufactured homes dwellings and single family dwellings. Where a combination of manufactured homes and single family dwellings are proposed, at least sixty percent (60%) of the lots shall be reserved exclusively for manufactured homes. 4. Plat designation: Plats recorded for a manufactured housing subdivision 27 shall contain the following statement, "This is a manufactured housing subdivision" and shall indicate which lots are reserved exclusively for Glass A eFS manufactured homes. SEC. 30-83 CIVIC USES Sec. 30-83-0.5 Camps (B) ..........rdin the AG -3 and AG -1 Districts: 4. One year-round residence, including a Glass -A Manufactured Home, may be constructed as a caretakers home in addition to other facilities on the property. Sec. 30-85-9 Campground (A) General standards: 6. One manufactured home, established pursuant to this ordinance, may be located in a campground as a caretaker's residence. SEC. 30-91 OFF STREET PARKING, STACKING AND LOADING C Sec. 30-91-9 Minimum Parking Required USE TYPE (B) Residential Use Types Manufactured Home—,Glass-A Manufactured Home, Accessory PARKING REQUIRED 2 spaces per dwelling unit 1 additional space All Sections of the Zoning Ordinance not specifically identified above shall remain unchanged by these proposed amendments. This ordinance shall become effective on July 1, 1995. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: ren a orron, Depu Jerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 29 ORDINANCE 62795-10 - AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE cc: File APPENDIX A OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Circuit Court emens, Judge, Roy B. Willett, Judge Clifford R. Weckstein, Judge Diane McQ. Strickland, Judge Richard C. Pattisall, Judge Robert P. Doherty, Jr. Judge Steven A. McGraw, Clerk Juvenile Domestic Relations District Court Joseph tJudge PhilipTrompeer, Judg John B. Ferguson, Judge Joseph P. B -bunds, Judge Ruth P. Bates, Clerk Intake Counsellor General District Court o n� � pos o ou, udge George W. Harris, Judge William Broadhurst, Judge Vincent Lilley Judge Theresa A. Childress, Clerk SkipBurkart, Commonwealth Attorney Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Magistrates Sherri Krantz//Betty Perry John H. Cease, Police Chief Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator Diane D. Hyaft, Director, Finance O. Arnold Covey, Director, En ineering & Inspections Gary Robertson, Director, UtiX Michael Lazzuri Court Services Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer R. Wayne Compton Commissioner of Revenue Thomas C. Fuqua, thief, Fire & Rescue Bill Rand Director, General Services Thomas S. Haislip, Director, Parks & Recreation Elaine Carver, Director, Procurement John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Main Library Roanoke Law Library 315 Church Avenue, SW, Rke 24016 Roanoke County Code Book 30 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JUNE 27, 1995 ORDINANCE 62795-11 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 68.4 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED BEYOND THE TERMINUS OF TODDSBURY DRIVE TO THE EAST (TAX MAP NOS. 51.03-1-1 AND 51.03-1-2) IN THE VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF AG -3 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF AR WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF ARFER CORPORATION WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on April 25, 1995, and the second reading and public hearing were held May 23, 1995, and continued to June 27, 1995; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on May 2, 1995; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 68.4 acres, as described herein, and located beyond the terminus of Toddsbury Drive to the east, (Tax Map Numbers 51.03-1-1 and 51.03-1-2) in the Vinton Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of AG -3, Agricultural/Rural Preserve District, to the zoning classification of AR, Agricultural/Residential District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Akfer Corporation. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Tax Map No. 51.03-1-1 - BEGINNING at a post on the Lawhorn line; thence S. 51 deg. 15' W. 163.5 feet to an iron pipe near 1 a large rock on the side of a gully; thence S. 3 deg. E. 743 feet to a white oak on a ridge; thence S. 32 deg. E. 550 feet passing an iron pin in the bottom of a hollow to a poplar near a rock; thence S. 65 deg. E. 223 feet to an iron pin in the center of the Vinton -Roanoke Water Company road passing a red oak near the edge of road; thence with the center of said road N. 57 deg. E. 60 feet; thence N. 39 deg. 39' E. 177.8 feet; thence N. 49 deg. 30' E. 167 feet to the Baker line; thence with said Baker line N. 4 deg. 45' W. 780 feet, more or less, to a post corner to Lawhorn land; thence with said Lawhorn line, N. 57 deg. 51' W. 247.2 feet to a stone; thence N. 53 deg. 6' W. 180 feet to a white oak; thence N. 47 deg. 8' W 197 feet to a post at the place of beginning, and containing 19.407 acres, more or less, according to a survey made by C. M. Stancliff, Certified Surveyor. Tax Map No. 51.03-1-2 - BEGINNING at a double chestnut oak on side of mountain and off from same a new line S. 47 deg. 30' E. 53.08 poles to a white oak; thence N. 53 deg. 30' E. 11.52 poles to a stone; thence S. 58 deg. 15' E. 16.80 poles to a point near a small branch (the remainder of the description being copied from the original description in the deed from James Gardner to Jno. R. Hannabas, with the courses as follows:) thence N. 88 deg. -- 29.52 poles to a point; S. 54 deg. 30' E. 18 poles to the road; thence with the road N. 89 deg. E. 9 1/16 poles to a point; N. 59 deg. 15' E. 19 poles to the middle of the road; thence leaving the road N. 13 deg. 15' W. 32 poles to a hickory; N. 82 deg. 45' E. 60 poles; N. 30 deg. 15' W. 11.64 poles; S. 58 deg. 45' W. 75 poles to the beginning, at a double chestnut oak. The above description of land contains 49 acres, more or less, but the land is sole in gross and not by the acre. 4. That the owner has voluntarily proferred, in writing, the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors accepts: (1) The developer of this property shall, at their sole expense, provide an additional asphalt surface overlayed along the entire length of the existing Toddsbury Drive. This new asphalt surface shall have a thickness of one and one half inches (1.511) on those portions of Toddsbury Drive between the intersection of Falling Creek Drive and Burnt Quarter Drive (lower intersection). The remaining portions of Toddsbury Drive from Burnt Quarter Drive (lower intersection) -to its present cul-de-sac terminus shall be overlayed with an additional two inches (211) of asphalt surface. These improvements to Toddsbury shall be .completed prior to Roanoke County and the Virginia Department of Transportation, accepting for maintenance, any new streets in Falling Creek Section S. F, (2) No structure proposed for construction within the 68.4 acres shall have a base floor elevation of greater than 1820 feet above sea level. All future subdivision plats for this 68.4 acres shall contain covenant restrictions limiting the base floor elevations to 1820 feet or less. All applicants for building permits for new structures shall provide an engineering certification that the structure proposed has a base floor elevation of 1820 feet or less. (3) All lots shall be served by public water. Any water tank constructed shall be located such that the top of the tank shall not extend above the ridgeline of the property. Any water tank constructed shall be painted in a dark or muted color. (4) No more than 47 residential lots shall be platted on the 68.4 acres. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance with conditions, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix NAYS: Supervisor Eddy ABSTAIN: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk cc: File Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 27, 1995 ORDINANCE 62795-12 DENYING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO JIM WALTER HOMES, INC. TO BUILD A CONSTRUCTION STORAGE YARD ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ROUTE 200 AND VA 674, (TAX PARCEL 88.03-1-1.1.), CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DIS- TRICT WHEREAS, Jim Walter Homes, Inc. has filed a petition to build a construction storage yard on the southeast corner of Route 220 and VA 674 in the Cave Spring Magisterial District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on June 6, 1995; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading on this matter on May 23, 1995; the second reading and public hearing on this matter was held on June 27, 1995. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: On motion of Supervisor Minnix to deny the special use permit, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Eddy, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: Supervisor Kohinke A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney NORTH Tarr . aov ' 23 , „ •fit : �: 1 `( • trw _ y 21 Sm L 13 r IB 2C r IA4x '�: I1.92 x •21 22 :-•' R 173x101 "? s'x 229x 23 o ifa° . 19 tG1ac .� t31a:1C1 J L22 4.99 as ' !Ow • y,° ► 23 20413 x �s+y Ic3x •• sru / \ VSAs !w y:ll - !140 •'' h 12 H 2 29 r 27 • it l.73 x 4f 30 O • 1.17x j 10; Ac p,37as .3l i • l7j7 l:94 30 —e-35 100 ac ` 28 • c do "c wll S !Ou\ f• 5 1 23 u Sitio 103 x / 104e1,T•t3� { •` �e1 4e Sr" is : 1s 73x0 9 36 , / •• 34 34 L99 as ` / \ 1 41 % LSOat 17 35 4 38 32 _ \ 6 1 \ tM srwe xn 33 i e ! 4 us 2 s 4 \ 6 2= do • ..w 43 2 \¢ t SIM vea .vd Lga 4i AL —At SW tif4s %1;2 ) \ s7A 45 s 6 \ 122as 1"t �/ 2.1t ae . !.>u - ill'"'TTTT \ y ?46 ULF. 1 TTL42ae 194aeuel I.17 ae \ AC2S s...... r.. ` •++a.wst \ �; !!44 3 SSas ! line s...r 11 1 ��--11 S m 76 73 ''• ,bas 5~ Alow4f 1,15 owe Ca r7 !1337! \ J \ /1 r ` 3sFy 17.1 &COAs 101 ,3D y 2 6.95ae Q\ l22 as 7.Osac a S.l1ae t1C 742 ae T4 \ 'A003 0 ' 3� LOC ' r'0 23 O' L464 woes >•_ Sa7 1:94 �►t 3 �4cO1 ri !OV n \ 1 i, :9x 2 •:° L2las S \ 7 4v +' 4 % 3S �' •'Z^�i NCSS. /� V 3 ' : 4 9 .r .. if.!' k t01 065 AC 1.771e 753 . • r V \ 4'0 •w +i . • �1 yaf>t i O _, 2 O °v 1Z I sips L17ac 4 2,79:c �►� � ` � •ri 13 \ .39,: .w Liqu 3 . w ` ' '�!4'4s' 44 �yI \\`69.1 aS s6 r... s.• 2 �'"'iii ei�3 105ae1011054101 •- \ 1.744 ......... C.�. g4 x 1Ct 14 f �4 � 68 " � � ` 2.00.sc tQ 11/1 l44f ~ \ . `4Sf. G7 4.49actcl10 I•' `t •; / \c1 JIM WALTER HOMES INC. 4' * DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING TAX # 88.03-1-1.1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 27, 1995 RESOLUTION 62795-13 ESTABLISHING SALARIES FOR THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AND THE COUNTY ATTORNEY WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby establishes the salaries for the County Administrator and the County Attorney for Fiscal Year 1995-96. BE IT RESOLVED, By the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the annual salary for the County Administrator shall be increased by 4.8% ($4413.76) calculated upon the midpoint for Grade 43 of the County of Roanoke Classification and Pay Plan, July 1995. The adjusted annual salary for the County Administrator shall be $105,748.86. 2. That the annual salary for the County Attorney shall be increased by 4.8% ($3631.16) calculated upon the midpoint for Grade 39 of the County of Roanoke Classification and Pay Plan, July 1995. In addition the annual salary of the County Attorney is increased by the sum of $3,000.00 for the purpose of an elective deferral under an existing salary reduction agreement pursuant to Sections 402 and 457 of the Internal Revenue Code. The adjusted annual - salary for the County Attorney shall be $89,627.11. 3. That the effective date for the establishment of these salaries shall be July 1, 1995. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution with 4.8% increase from midpoint for County Administrator and County 1 Attorney and with $3,000 additional increase for County Attorney for an annuity, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Nickens, Minnix NAYS: Supervisor Eddy A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Ho ton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance D. Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 2