HomeMy WebLinkAbout3/24/1998 - Adopted Board RecordsAT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998
RESOLUTION 032498-1 EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE BOARD
OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY UPON THE RETIREMENT OF
EDWARD E. "GENE" BURFORD, GENERAL SERVICES
WHEREAS, Edward E. "Gene" Burford retired from Roanoke County on March 1,
1998, after twenty-seven years of services, and was inducted into the Quarter Century
Club in 1997; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Burford was first employed in 1971 as a Motor Equipment Operator
1 in the General Services Department, and has also served as Laborer, Fuel Dispenser
Attendant, Refuse Collector, and Custodian; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Burford has a pleasing disposition and friendly attitude, and was
always willing to go the extra mile for his co-workers, such as opening the Roanoke County
Administration Center during non-operating hours; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Burford, through his employment with Roanoke County, has been
instrumental in improving the quality of life for its citizens.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens
of Roanoke County to EDWARD E. "GENE" BURFORD for twenty-seven years of
capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke County.
1
FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a
happy, restful, and productive retirement.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Brenda J. Holto , Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Joseph Sgroi, Director, Human Resources
Resolutions of Appreciation File
2
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998
RESOLUTION 032498-2 APPROVING THE APPROPRIATION OF AND
PRIORITIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR FY 1998-99 and FY
1999-2000 FROM THE VIRGINIA JUVENILE COMMUNITY CRIME CONTROL
ACT
WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke has been advised that it will receive monies
from the Virginia Juvenile Community Crime Control Act in the amount of $490,374 each
for FY 1998-99 and FY 1999-2000, and
WHEREAS, these monies must be used to fund services for the target populations
identified in the Act which include CHINS (Children in need of services), CHINSUP
(Children in need of Supervision), Delinquent, Diverted, and First Offender children, and
WHEREAS, the County staff has coordinated with the Director of the Court Service
Unit and the Judges of the Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court to determine the
services necessary to address the needs of the children appearing before the Court and
before the intake officers, and
WHEREAS, the services of Intensive Probation, Community Services programs,
Probation Aide Services, and the purchase of services for Outreach Detention, Crisis
Intervention, and group residential care have been identified as the highest priority needs
for the targeted population of Roanoke County appearing before the court and the intake
officers, and
WHEREAS, the County recognizes the requirement to provide the local
Maintenance of Effort (MOE) monies in the amount of $24,644 for each of the two fiscal
1
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County that the VJCCCA monies are hereby accepted in the amount $490,374 for FY
1998-99 and FY 1999-2000 are hereby appropriated for the above referenced programs.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
&U-4� Q. k6-�
Brenda J. Holt , Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator
Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance
Michael Lazzuri, Court Services
Marty Gilmore
Department of Juvenile Justice
2
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998
RESOLUTION 032498-2 APPROVING THE APPROPRIATION OF AND
PRIORITIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR FY 1998-99 and FY
1999-2000 FROM THE VIRGINIA JUVENILE COMMUNITY CRIME CONTROL
ACT
WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke has been advised that it will receive monies
from the Virginia Juvenile Community Crime Control Act in the amount of $490,374 each
for FY 1998-99 and FY 1999-2000, and
WHEREAS, these monies must be used to fund services for the target populations
identified in the Act which include CHINS (Children in need of services), CHINSUP,
(Children in need of Supervision), Delinquent, Diverted, and First Offender children, and
WHEREAS, the County staff has coordinated with the Director of,the Court,Service
Unit and the Judges of the Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court to determine the
services necessary to address the needs of the children appearing before the Court and
before the intake officers, and
WHEREAS, the services of Intensive Probation, Community Services programs,
Probation Aide Services, and the purchase of services for Outreach Detention, Crisis
Intervention, and group residential care have been identified as the highest priority needs
for the targeted population of Roanoke County appearing before the court and the intake
officers, and
WHEREAS, the County recognizes the requirement to provide the local
Maintenance of Effort (MOE) monies in the amount of $24,644 for each of the two fiscal
1
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County that the VJCCCA monies are hereby accepted in the amount $490,374 for FY
1998-99 and FY 1999-2000 are hereby appropriated for the above referenced programs.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
&J.41& Q kLa�
Brenda J. Holt , Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator
Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance
Michael Lazzuri, Court Services
Marty Gilmore
Department of Juvenile Justice
2
A
ACTION NO. -032498-3
ITEM NO.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: March 24, 1998
AGENDA ITEM: Consideration of claim by Edward C. Woodard
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
Recommend denial of this claim for damages resulting from sewer backup. It would be easy and popular
to pay this claim because of the small dollar amount. However, that sets a precedent for which we are not
prepared. We have worked under a policy similar to that of VDOT, we provide the public utility and maintain it
to our best ability. Occasionally, someone will "hit a pothole" and have damage.
We are pleased to have this few number of claims with the effects of "EI Nino." All surrounding localities
have had similar or worse experiences.
If the Board wishes to consider this claim under a "Mr. Goodwrench" policy, we should revise the policy
to determine when and when not to participate. We need to establish guidelines for our participating when the
property owner HAS homeowners insurance and when there is NO insurance. Do we purchase umbrella coverage
for the very large claim? We need to measure depreciation and factor that into our formula. We then need to
establish a reserve fund to pay claims. Based on the number of claims we have had in the past five years, $50,000
per year should be sufficient. This can be taken out of the Utility Fund but may impact rates if there is a very large
claim.
Again, I recommend denial. If you choose otherwise, I recommend a work session to discuss it further.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
This claim by Edward C. Woodard seeks $2,470.14 for damages to their property
as a result of a sewer back-up on December 16, 1997.
BACKGROUND:
Section 15.2-1245 et seg, of the Code of Virginia, establishes a procedure for the
submission of claims by citizens to the governing body for action. The Board of
Supervisors may either allow the claim and authorize its payment, or it may disallow the
claim. No legal action may be maintained by any person against the County upon any
claim or demand unless that person shall have first presented his claim to the board of
supervisors for allowance.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
On December 16, 1997, a blockage in the main sewer line resulted in a backup of
sewage into the house owned Mr. Woodard at 5523 Cynthia Drive, Roanoke, Virginia
24018. After investigation by both County staff and the VACo Insurance Programs Group
Self Insurance Pool, it is determined that the facts do not justify making payment on behalf
of Roanoke County. It appears that the blockage was caused by grease in the sewer line.
County staff also found a tree root invasion of the sewer line. The grease may have built
up behind the tree roots.
Travelers Property Casualty Corp., Mr. Woodard's homeowner's insurance carrier,
also declined coverage.
There is prior history of a sewer blockage in an adjoining sewer line segment. On
June 28, 1990, there is a record of a backup at 5517 Cynthia Drive (next door to Mr.
Woodard's property). Mr. Woodard has submitted a letter from Charles R. Simpson (the
prior owner) stating that a backup occurred "six or seven years ago", but this was never
reported to the County. This blockage was caused by roots and grease. The line was
rodded to remove the roots and grease. Then the line was televised, and no damage or
structural defect to the sewer line was found. The roots were lying loose in the bottom
of the line, and could have washed down from anywhere in the system as any foreign
matter. The line was inspected for defects, but none were found. Therefore, no further
repair work or action was warranted.
On December 18, 1997, after clearing the blockage in the sewer line, a shear break
in the line was found. This break has been repaired (a point repair). It is assumed that
the shear break in the sewer line allowed roots to enter the line; then grease built up
behind the roots, restricting the flow of sewage, and resulting in the backup into Mr.
Woodward's house.
These two events (June 28, 1990 and December 16, 1998) are unrelated to one
another. They occurred in different sewer line segments or sections. The backup in 1990
was in a different line section and could have effected both properties. The 1997 blockage
would only effect the subject property.
A recent decision (1989) of the Supreme Court of Virginia (Town of Vinton v. Roger
Bryant, et al, 238 Va. 229) addresses the legal issue of this claim. The sewage backup that
caused the Bryant's damage occurred when a clog of grease formed in the Town's sewer
line in front of Bryant's home. Prior to the backup this particular line never caused any
difficulty. The Town regularly cleaned and inspected the line.
The Supreme Court quoted from an earlier, similar case, to repeat that negligence
cannot be presumed from the mere occurrence of damage. The plaintiff or claimant must
produce evidence showing that the defendant is guilty of negligence which was the
2
proximate cause of the event. He proved only that a blockage occurred and that they
suffered damage. This is not sufficient to prove that a local government is negligent, and
proof of negligence is an essential element of any claim.
The Board will also recall the work session of March 10, 1998, during which the
Utility Director briefed the Board on the County's extensive sewer line inspection, repair
and replacement program (the Utility Department annually spends approximately $1
Million on the SSER program, including $380,000 for sewer line repair and replacement).
The County's inspection, repair and replacement program exceeds that of any other locality
in the Roanoke Valley.
FISCAL IMPACTS:
Allowance of this claim will result in the payment of $2,470.14 to Mr. Edward C.
Woodard.
Allowance of this claim, absent a showing of any negligence on the part of the
County, may result in the payment of additional, questionable claims, thereby resulting in
increased costs to the Utility Fund. Since the Utility Fund is an enterprise fund, these
increased costs may result in future rate increases to utility customers.
ALTERNATIVES:
The Board may choose among the following alternatives:
1) Allow the claim and authorize the payment of $2,470.14 to Mr. Edward C.
Woodard;
2) Disallow the claim. Disallowance will permit Mr. Woodard to pursue his
claim in court.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the board disallow this claim.
3
Respectfully submitted,
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
No Yes Abs
Approved (x) Motion by: H. Odell Minnix to DENY Harrison _ x _
Denied () Johnson _ x _
Received () McNamara _ x _
Referred ( Minnix _ x _
To () Nickens — x _
cc: File
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
Edward C. Woodard
2
Town of Vinton v. Bryant 229
238 Va. 229 (1989)
TOWN OF VINTON
V.
ROGER BRYANT, ET AL.
Record No. 880382
September 22, 1989
Present: All the Justices
Judgment in favor of homeowners for property damage
caused by the alleged negligence of a municipality in per-
miving sewer.lines to back up and sewage to enter their
home was not supported by sufficient evidence and is
''- reversed.
-Torts — Negligence — Evidence — Damages — Burden of Proof — Cities,
Counties and Towns
clog in the municipal sewer line in front of the home of the plaintiffs caused a
backup of sewage which entered the home. The sewer system was inspected
•and cleaned once a year as part of a one-year complete circle of the town.
The homeowners recovered for the property damage and the municipality
ii
appeals.
Negligence cannot be presumed from the mere occurrence of damage and
the burden is on a plaintiff to produce evidence of preponderating weight
from which the trier of fact can find that the defendant was guilty of negli-
gence which was a proximate cause of the event.
The evidence must prove more than a probability of negligence. Here the
r plaintiff homeowners failed to carry their burden of producing evidence of
<' preponderating weight from which the jury could find that the municipality
was guilty of negligence.
Plaintiffs proved only that a blockage occurred in the sewer line and that
they suffered damage as a result. Proof of the essential element of negli-
gence as the cause of the blockage was lacking and the judgment of the trial
court is reversed.
ppeal from a judgment of the Circuit Court of Roanoke
nty. Hon. Gerald O. Clemens, judge presiding.
Reversed and final judgment.
usan W. Spangler (David B. Hart; Fox, Wooten & Hart, P.C.,
)riefs), for appellant.
Cha
230 Town of Vinton v. Bryant
238 Va. 229 (1989)
Anthony F. Anderson (Melissa W. Friedman, on brief), for
appellees.
Chief Justice Carrico delivered the opinion of the Court
In a jury trial, the plaintiffs, Roger Bryant and Linda Bryant,
recovered a verdict against the defendant, the Town of Vinton, in
the sum of $2,830.74 for property damage caused by the Town's
alleged negligence in permitting sewage to back up and enter the
Bryants' home. The trial court entered judgment on the verdict,
and we granted the Town an appeal.
The Town has assigned a number of errors. In our opinion,'
however, the dispositive question is whether the Br}.ants produced
sufficient evidence of negligence on the part of the Town to sup-
port the jury's verdict.
The evidence shows that the backup which caused the Bryants'
damage occurred on January 10, 1985, when a "cloC of grease
formed in the Town's sewer line located under the street in front
of the Bryants' home. Prior to the backup, this particular line had
never caused any difficulty. The Town inspected and cleaned each
sewer line once during the year as part of a "one-year complete
circle of the town." The line in question was inspected and cle-
aned during the July or August preceding the January 1985
backup.
The Bryants say they established negligence on the part of the
Town by showing that the backup in question occurred during the x
winter months; that sewer lines become clogged more often during
winter when the cold solidifies grease; that the Town knew sewer ,Q
lines are more likely to become blocked in the winter; and that,
despite this knowledge, the Town inspected and cleaned the line in _
question only during the summer. The Bryants maintain that a
jury could reasonably conclude from the evidence that had the
Town "cleaned and inspected the sewers in the winter when there
is a propensity toward clogs, rather than in the summer, the sew-,
age backup would have been prevented."
[ 1-2) We disagree with the Bryants. In Town of West Point V.
't
Evans, 224 Va. 625, 299 S.E.2d 349 (1983), we said: x
Negligence cannot be presumed from the mere occurrence of
damage. The burden is on a plaintiff to produce evidence of
preponderating weight from which the trier of fact can find
Town of Vinton v. Bryant 231
238 Va. 229 (1989)
that the defendant was guilty of negligence which was a
proximate cause of the event resulting in damage. The evi-
dence must prove more than a probability of negligence.
Id. at 627-28, 299 S.E.2d at 351.
In this case, the Bryants failed to carry their burden of produc-
ing evidence of preponderating weight from which the jury could
find the Town guilty of negligence. The Bryants' burden required
them to prove that the Town, knowing blockages are more likely
to occur during cold weather, was negligent in failing to inspect
and clean its sewer lines during wintertime, rather than summer
and
Town's practice, however, was to inspect and clean its
time.lines on "a one-year complete circle" program, which meant, of
necessity, that some lines would be inspected and cleaned in sum-
mertime and others in wintertime. So far as the record shows, the
scheduling of the line in question for summertime treatment re-
sulted from mere coincidence, rather than carelessness.
It was also the Town's practice to make more frequent inspec-
,tions of those lines in which blockages had previously occurred.
The record shows conclusively, however, that no difficulty had
been experienced with the line serving the Bryants' property prior
to the time the backup in question occurred.
Nothing in the record suggests that the Town's practices are
unreasonable in any way. Indeed, the evidence is uncontradicted
that the Town's "once a year routine maintenance" program is
"consistent with what . .. other local government [entities are]
doing with their sewer systems."
[3] In the final analysis, all the Bryants proved was that a
} _ blockage occurred in the Town's sewer line and that they suffered
damage as a result. Lacking is proof of the essential element of
negligence as the cause of the blockage. Accordingly, the judg-
ment of the trial court will be reversed, the jury verdict set aside,
P- and final judgment entered here in favor of the Town.
Reversed and final judgment.
5523 Cynthia Dr.
Roanoke, Va. 24018
Mar. 12, 1998
To the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County:
This is to verify the following;
On Dec. 16,1997 at approximately 7:15a.m. my home was flooded by raw sewage coming from
the drain in my basement floor. This extended through both the finished and unfinished parts of
our basement. The cleanup and replacement costs amounted to just under $ 2,500.00. I wish to
request reimbursement for damage done due to the negligence of Roanoke County Utility Dept..
This letter is to verify the following items...
A) A letter verifying that my own home insurance policy does not cover this damage.
B) A letter from Charles R. Simpson confirming that this has happened before at this
address.
C) A letter from Service Master detailingclean-UP costs ............................... $619.50
D) A letter from Carpet Village detailing the costs of carpet replacement. $1,610.64
E) A phone # (540) 982-6686 to Wes Chappell of Fret Mill Music Co.
Of Roanoke Historic City Market who gave us the estimated
cost of replacing our son's Bass Drum -Ludwig Rocker 16"x 22"......$240.00
Total costs $2,470.14
I would appreciate your immediate attention to this matter in order to avoid legal action.
Thank you.
Count-� � '�anr�olcC
SLS r �Oe Ecce -Nn', 5 G�`
cc
Edward C. Woodard
Q -,r, 5 Subs -f', b -c( Q n c l
Gray &( (Y)�Irc.fg , 15(q,6
n�uY� PL
MY Commission Expires February 28, 1999
Charles R Simpson, Inc.
January 8, 1998
RE: 5523 Cynthia Drive
Roanoke, VA
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
This is to confirm that six to sevens years ago, I was the owner of the above referenced
property. At this time, we experienced a sewer back-up in the main line.
Due to the damage caused by the water and sewage, we had to redo the carpeting,
linoleum, and baseboards, etc. in the family room, bedroom, bath, and storage room.
Sincer y,
Charles R. Simpson
CRS.jcs
Received
nl Roanoke County V
Risk Mgmt ��;;
of
���f�Za-61,
P. O. BOX 20539 • 3420 ELECTRIC ROAD • ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24018 TELEPHONE 774-3407
5523 Cynthia Drive
Roanoke, Va. 24018
Home (540) 772-4902
Work (540) 774-3217
Jan. 7, 1998
To Whom It May Concern,
On Dec. 16, 1997 at approximately 7:15 a.m., my home was flooded by
raw sewage coming from the drain in my basement floor. The sewage covered the
unfinished basement portion of the floor, ran into the carpeted hallway and closet,
seeped into the lower part of the carpeted stairs, into the carpeted basement den,
and seeped into the carpet of the downstairs bedroom and closet.
Most furniture damage was minimal because of the speed which we used
in attempting to get our possessions out of harm's way. My son's bass drum was
damaged with the sewage seeping into its interior. Other more fragile items were
lost.
We spent the entire first day attempting to clean up the mess and figure
out what happened. It is clear to me now that the cause was from the county's
main sewage line in front of our house. This has happened before to our house
(though I was not living in it at the time... approximately 6-7 years ago).
Enclosed is a note verifying that my own insurance will not cover this.
There is also a letter from the company that came in the following day (after our
futile attempt to clean and dry the rugs) who essentially removed the padding and
rugs because of the sewage and odor. They disinfected our basement and dryed it
out allowing us to to remain in the house (the bacteria count had begun to climb
and the odor as well) Another letter verifies the cost of rug and pad replacement
and installation. Another letter verifies that this is a repeat performance at the
same address.
My son got an estimate on what the replacement cost would be for his
bass drum.
This of course does not include any of the first day expenses (three people
N1,ro j S 9 7077
M
p
pec(gved z4"
MB�� �3
working the majority of the day to clean out the initial sewage, a water pump's
use to keep the sewage from spreading completely through the basement, a water
vacuum for attempting to remove the liquid sewage from the rugs and floors.
Meals for the workers.) Neither does this include the extreme inconvenience and
hardship that this placed on my family and myself ..five days before an Open
House pertaining to work that was planned had to be canceled... lost work
hours—eight days before Christmas... living for at least 3-4 weeks with only half
the house available with furniture, boxes and items piled up everywhere.
I am not "after blood" in terms of damages. I am willing to settle this for a
little less than $2,500. However, you might have guessed that I am more than a
little "ticked". I personally would prefer not to contact a lawyer over this.
Therefore I strongtv encourage quick action on this matter. If this is done quickly
and in good faith, I will not lengthen my list of costs.
If you have questions about any of this or any of the bills and estimates
that are enclosed... don't hesitate to contact me.
Thank You,
Edward C. Woodard
P \
' Received
Roanoke County
N� Risk M&A AG'
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER, ON TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998
RESOLUTION 032498-4 APPROVING THE ROANOKE REGIONAL AIRPORT
COMMISSION BUDGET FOR FY 1998-99, UPON CERTAIN TERMS AND
CONDITIONS
WHEREAS, Section 24.13 of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Act and
Section 17.(a) of the contract between the City of Roanoke, Roanoke County, and the
Roanoke Regional Airport Commission provide that the Commission shall prepare and
submit its operating budget for the forthcoming fiscal year to the Board of Supervisors
of the County and City Council of the City; and
WHEREAS, by report dated March 11, 1998, a copy of which is on file in the
office of the Clerk to the Board, the Executive Director of the Roanoke Regional Airport
Commission has submitted a request that the County approve the FY 1998-99 budget
of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia that the FY 1998-99 budget and proposed capital expenditures for the
Roanoke Regional Airport Commission as set forth in the March 11, 1998, report of the
Commission Executive Director, a copy of which is incorporated by reference herein, is
hereby APPROVED, and the County Administrator and the Clerk are authorized to
execute and attest, respectively, on behalf of the County, any documentation, in form
approved by the County Attorney, necessary to evidence said approval.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
&A.4&Q 90-44��
Brenda J. Hol n, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance
Jacqueline L. Shuck, Executive Director, RRAC
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
Bob L. Johnson, Chairman, RRAC
Mary F. Parker, Clerk, Roanoke City Council
2
23 -Leh -98 ATTACHMENT I
ROANOKE KLUIUNAL AIRPORT COMMISSION
FOR YEAR 1998-99 BUDGET
CommBudg98-99
1997-98 Budgeted
1998-99 Budgeted
EXPENSE BUDGET
I
Expenditures
Expenditures
1. Operations and Maintenance Expenses
$1,755,390
$1,825,253
A. Salaries, Wages and Benefits
B. Operating Expenditures
1,995,760
2,076,009
C. Other Projects
70,000
126,100
Total Operations and Maintenance
3,821,150
4,027,362
2. Non -Operating Expenses
A. Interest
527,225
503,511
B. Debt Service
317,581
339,032
Total Non -Operating
844,806
842,543
3. Capital Expenses
160,530
101,390
A. Capital Projects and Purchases
B. Multi -Year Projects
0
168,500
Total Capital Expenses
160,530
269,890
Total Budgeted Expenditures
$4,826,486
$5,139,795
1997-98 Budgeted
1998-99 Budgeted
REVENUE PROJECTIONS
Projected Revenues
Projected Revenues
1. Operating Revenues
A. Airfield
$1,003,897
$1,127,324
B. General Aviation
112,194
132,195
C. Terminal Related
3,333,031
3,949,914
D. Other Revenues
225,313
228,023
Total Projected Operating Revenues
4,674,435
5,437,456
2. Non -Operating Revenues
46,000
48,000
A. Interest from Debt Service
B. Interest on Investments
400,000
370,000
Total Projected Non -Operating Revenues
446,000
418,000
$5,120,435
$5,855,456
Total Projected Revenue
ATTACHMENT II
Proposed Capital Expenditures
(For projects expected to exceed $100,000 in
cost and intended to benefit five or more accounting periods)
A. Projects
1. Construct Overflow Parking Lot
a.) Description: Construct 300-350 vehicle overflow, surface parking lot across
Aviation Drive from airport terminal building.
b.) Justification: During holidays, spring break and other heavy travel times, the
current public parking lots are filled and some cars are required to park in the
grass field across the street. The new overflow lot is proposed in order to avoid
losing customers and to delay the need to expend funds for the construction of a
parking deck.
Estimated Cost: $400,000.00
B. Funding Sources
Federal AIP Grant Funds -0-
State Aviation Grant Funds -0-
Commission Funds 400,000.00
City and County Funds -0-
Estimated Total Project Funding $400,000.00
csp030598.h
CommlattachII.bgt
RESOLUTION OF THE ROANOKE REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION
Adopted this 11th day of March 1998
No. 03-031198
A RESOLUTION approving and adopting the Commission's Operating and Capital
Purchase Budget for fiscal year 1998-99.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission that the fiscal year
1998-99 Operating and Capital Purchase Budget for the Commission as set forth in the report
and accompanying attachment by the Executive Director dated March 11, 1998, is hereby
approved;
BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Executive Director is authorized on behalf of
the Commission to submit the fiscal year 1998-99 Operating and Capital Purchase Budget, as
well as a list of Proposed Capital Expenditures, to the Roanoke City Council and the Roanoke
County Board of Supervisors for approval pursuant to the contract between the Commission,
Roanoke City and Roanoke County dated January 28, 1987, as amended.
ATTEST:
Secreta
AYES: Macfarlane, Smith, Turner, Whittaker, Johnson
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
A-032498-5
ACTION #
ITEM NUMBER_;
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: March 24, 1998
SUBJECT: Request for Approval of FY 1998-99 Cable Television Budget
COUNTY ADMMSTRATORS COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Roanoke County, the City of Roanoke, and the Town of
Vinton jointly operate Roanoke Valley Television (RVTV). The initial equipment and facilities for
the television studio were funded through a capital grant from Cox Communications in the amount
of $480,000. The studio is located at the Jefferson Center, and currently employs four full time staff
members who produce videos and shows for the local governments and school systems which are
cablecast along with government meetings on Cox Communications Channel 3 and Adelphia
Communications Channel 3 in the West County area.
RVTV is governed by the Roanoke Valley Regional Cable Television Committee, which
includes representatives from the City, the County, and the Town. The operating budget for RVTV
is provided for by the three governments, based on the proportion of Cox customers located in each
jurisdiction. The governing bodies have informally agreed to provide up to 20% of the franchise fee
paid by Cox Communications to fund the operations of the facility.
During 1997, RVTV has produced the following for the County: nine departmental videos
or public service announcements, 11 Roanoke County Todays, 11 videos, 22 live Board meetings,
and has also provided upkeep of the Message Board. Additionally, a new Roanoke County School
show, Accent Excellence, debuted, and will be produced quarterly. Overall, programming increased
55% in the last year, as the staff works toward the goal of increasing use of Channel 3. This is
particularly impressive, considering that RVTV staff was reduced to two people for several months
during the year, due to illness and turnover.
The Cable Television Committee recently approved purchase of an automated playback
system, which will greatly increase the number of hours per day that programming can be played on
Channel 3, without increasing staff time to do so. This piece of equipment should become operational
later in the spring.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Roanoke Valley Cable Television Committee has approved
the attached budget for the Fiscal Year 1998-99 for the operation of RVTV. The budget includes
the following highlights:
Reinstatement of the Assistant Station Manager position. When the Assistant Station
Manager position became vacant due to an internal promotion, it was reclassified to a television
producer position. Since that time, with the current compliment of four full time staff members and
the increasing demands for programming, the Cable Television Committee approved the reclassifica-
tion of the position back to its original grade.
Addition of a part-time production assistant. Adding an additional part time employee will
allow coverage in the station during cablecasts of live Board and Council meetings, and provide for
additional assistance in the video production area. The part time position can also assist with the data
entry which will be needed for the new automated playback system.
Cable Television staff is carried on the County's payroll and benefit system and will receive
the same increase as County employees. The proposed budget includes 3% for raises for the staff,
but actual raises will be at the County rate.
FISCAL IMPACT: The total RVTV budget request is $197,670, of which Roanoke County's share
is 33.8%, or $66,812, an increase of $2,256 over last year's budget. The total franchise fee paid by
Cox to Roanoke County last year is around $405,000, and 20% of that is $81,000, or $14,000 less
than this budget request. The total budget increase is 3%, due to savings in salaries from turnover.
Employees entering a new position earn less than those who left the position, holding the increase for
this year to a small amount.
RECOMMENDATION: The Cable Television Committee recommends that the Board approve this
budget request in the amount of $66,812.
Anne Marie Green, APR
Director, Community Relations
Approved (x)
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred ( )
To ( )
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
ACTION
Motion by: Harry C. Nickens to approve Harrison
the budget Johnson
cc: File
Anne Marie Green, Director, Community Relations
Brent Robertson, Budget Manager
Vincent Copenhaver, Finance Department
Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance
VOTE
No Yes Abs
McNamara _
Minnix
Nickens
RVTV 1997 Productions
Edited Videos
Title
Client
Length
Accent Excellence PSA
Roanoke County
:30
Bond
Roanoke City
5:40
Christmas Parade
Roanoke City
1:02:00
City Stage -History Time
Roanoke City Schools
10:00
City Stage -The Wiz
Roanoke City Schools
2:33:00
City Stage -A Dolls House
Roanoke City Schools
2:35:00
County Stage -Colonial Times
Roanoke County Schools
27:00
County Stage-G1enCove Authors
Roanoke County Schools
1:03:00
County Stage -Let George Do It
Roanoke County Schools
40:00
DARE Camp Music Video
Roanoke City
5:12
Employee Orientation
Roanoke City
12:00
Fire Ability Test
Roanoke City
5:50
Fire & EMS Music Video
Roanoke County
4:00
Fire & Rescue Services
Roanoke County
6:45
Fire Safety Tips
Roanoke County
1:50
Police Recruitment
Roanoke City
11:35
Take A Stand
Roanoke City
9:45
The Permit Zone
Roanoke County
13:48
Trash Automation
Roanoke City
5:40
VIEW -Welfare Reform
Roanoke County
5:50
(3)Vocational Education PSAs
Roanoke County Schools
1:30
Ward System
Roanoke City
3:00
Totals: Overall 56 City 34 County 22 Vinton 0
Percentage City 61% County 39% Vinton 0%
* Two special events were covered for the Town of Vinton - Vinton Bluegrass Festival &
Dogwood Festival
1997 Live Meetings
Totals Meeting
22 Board of Supervisors
25 City Council
RVTV covers all major special events in the City and the County, including Press
Conferences and Ground Breakings. In addition, many Training Sessions and Ceremonies
are also recorded.
1997 Shows
Total
Title
Client
Time
11
City Show
Roanoke City
28:50 each
11
Roanoke County Today
Roanoke County
26:50 each
11
Spotlight On City Schools
Roanoke City Schools
25:00 each
1
Accent Excellence
Roanoke County Schools
.25:00 each
Totals: Overall 56 City 34 County 22 Vinton 0
Percentage City 61% County 39% Vinton 0%
* Two special events were covered for the Town of Vinton - Vinton Bluegrass Festival &
Dogwood Festival
1997 Live Meetings
Totals Meeting
22 Board of Supervisors
25 City Council
RVTV covers all major special events in the City and the County, including Press
Conferences and Ground Breakings. In addition, many Training Sessions and Ceremonies
are also recorded.
ROANOKE VALLEY TELEVISION —GOVERNMENT AND EDUCATIONAL ACCESS
541 LUCK AVE., S.W, SUITE 145 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24016 —(703)343-0436
RVTV Productions 1996 & 1997
Departmental Videos
Shows
Live Cablecasts
Average Hours of
Programming Per Month
Average Hours of
Programming Per Year
1996
1997
Increase
18
22
+4(+22%)
29
34
+5(+17%)
39
47
+8(+21%)
67*
M
*based on hours of programming since May 1996
104
1,248
+37(+55%)
+444(+55%)
RVTV Proposed 1998-99 Budget
Increase over last year: $6,675 or 3%
Budget
Proposed
1010
Regular
106,719.00
103,060.00
1020
Part -Time
0
8,320.00
2100
FICA - Employer Contribution
8,162.00
8,521.00
2200
Retirement - VRS
12,603.00
13,150.00
2300
Group Health Insurance
7,864.00
6,078.00
2310
Group Dental Insurance
724.00
280.00
2400
Life Insurance - VSRS
373.00
361.00
3013
Professional Services - Other
7,500.00
7,500.00
3202
Repairs (Office Equipment)
500.00
500.00
3209
Repairs (Other Equipment)
1,000.00
1,000.00
3503
Printed Forms
500.00
500.00
3610
Advertising
0
500.00
5210
Postage
250.00
250.00
5230
Telephone
2,000.00
2,600.00
5235
Car Phones
300.00
300.00
5305
Motor Vehicle Insurance
1,600.00
1,600.00
5308
General Liability Insurance
1,100.00
1,100.00
5410
Lease/Rent of Equipment
500.00
500.00
5420
Lease/Rent of Buildings
26,600.00
26,600.00
5501
Travel (Milage)
250.00
250.00
5504
Travel (Convention & Cont)
1,000.00
1,000.00
5520
Dinner Meetings & Luncheons
500.00
500.00
5540
Training & Education
3,750.00
6,000.00
5801
Dues & Association Membership
700.00
700.00
6010
Office Supplies - General
1,000.00
1,000.00
6013
Small Equipment & Supplies
0
1,000.00
6014
Video Supplies
2,500.00
3,000.00
6080
Gas, Oil & Grease
500.00
500.00
6202
Subscriptions
2,500.00
1,000.00
Total
190,995.00
197,670.00
Increase over last year: $6,675 or 3%
Cox Communications 1997 Franchise Fees
Cox Communications paid a 5% franchise fee to the local governments in 1997 which amounted
to $1,288,556.00. The local governments have traditionally agreed to allocate up to 20% of the
franchise fees collected to the RVTV Operating Budget. For the coming year, that amount
would be $257,711. RVTV is requesting a budget of $197,670, which is $60,041 less than that
amount.
Cox calculates the percentage of subscribers in each locality as follows:
City 58.8%
County 33.8%
Vinton 7.4%
Based on those figures, each locality's contribution to an Operating Budget of $197,670
would be as follows:
City $116,230
County $66,812
Vinton $14,628
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY
ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 19987
RESOLUTION 032498-6 REQUESTING VDOT TO CONTINUE FUNDING
PROJECTS CURRENTLY ON THE PLAN AND ADOPT THOSE PROJECTS
IDENTIFIED AS "PROJECTS NOT ON PLAN" FOR INCLUSION INTO THE 1998-
2004 PRIMARY AND INTERSTATE SIX YEAR IMPROVEMENT PLAN
WHEREAS, the Six Year Improvement Program is the Commonwealth
Transportation Board's plan for identifying funds anticipated to be available for highway
and other forms of transportation construction; and
WHEREAS, this program is updated annually to assist in the allocation of federal
and state funds for interstate, primary, and secondary roads.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia as
follows:
1. That the following projects identified as "Projects on Plan" are
recommended to continue to receive funding for planning and construction;
and
• Interstate 81 - Roanoke County is very pleased with the Interstate 81
improvement study recently published and will be forwarding our
concerns within a couple of months.
• Interstate 73 — Again, Roanoke County is very pleased with the
progress on future Interstate 73 and we continue to support the 220
corridor as an 1-73 location. Roanoke County will be forwarding our
preferred corridor/alignment later this year.
• Rte. 221 (Bent Mountain Road) - Roanoke County is requesting
continued allocation of funds for this project. Roanoke County is very
receptive in splitting this project into two phases; especially if
construction funds are not available for the whole project. Our
immediate concerns are the horizontal curves within the first mile of
proposed improvements.
• Rte. 220 South - Roanoke County is pleased that the two miles of
220 South are being straightened. We look forward to the completion
of this project.
Rte. 11/460 West - Roanoke County is appreciative that this project
finally made the plan. Roanoke County requests additional funding
so this project can move forward as quickly as possible.
Rte. 419 - The right turn lane proposed along 419 at Hidden Valley
school is also a welcome improvement and we look forward to its
completion.
2. That the following projects identified as "Projects Not on Plan" have been
identified by the Board of Supervisors as extremely important to the growth
of Roanoke County and are requested to be included in the VDOT Six Year
Improvement Program for the 1998-99 Fiscal Year. They are listed in priority
order.
1. Rte. 11 (Williamson Road
Need: Now that Rte. 11 has been widened from Plantation Road
(Rte. 115) to Hollins College, there remains one section of three lane
road from Peters Creek Road (Rte. 117) to the Roanoke City limits.
Additionally, the existing bridge over Carvins Creek does not meet
current standards, and the realignment of Florist Road with Rte. 11
have created additional congestion and safety concerns. The
existing section of road, 1.52 miles, is a three -lane road with the
center lane used for turning movements. Ninety percent of the tracts
adjacent to Williamson Road are developed for commercial use.
Traffic counts: 15,000 vehicles per day from the Roanoke City limits
to Peters Creek Road. This stretch of road has also been identified
as an alternate route in case of a blockage on 1-81/581.
Recommended Improvements: A five -lane highway with appropriate
turning lanes, which will complete improvement of Williamson Road
from the city limits to the intersection of Rte. 115.
Cost: $10, 000, 000.
2. Rte. 115 (Plantation Road
Need: The existing road, 2.43 miles, is two lanes with many side
2
connections to residential neighborhoods. The road needs to be
improved from Roanoke City limits north, to Rte. 11. If full funding is
not available, various spot improvements, such as turn lanes,
alignment and grade improvements, would help with safety issues.
Additional land is available along the road for future development,
which will increase traffic in the future.
Traffic Counts: From the Roanoke City limits to Williamson Road,
11,000 vehicles per day.
Recommended Improvements: Five lane flush highway with
appropriate turning lanes.
Cost: $12,000,000 - $15,000,000.
3. Rte. 220S (Franklin Road)
Need: Increased development (Roanoke City and County) along this
stretch of road is creating traffic congestion for 220 expressway and
Rte. 419. This section of road is a bottleneck for local and commuter
traffic. An additional lane in both directions would reduce the traffic
congestion in the area.
Traffic counts: 20,000 to 25,000 vehicles per day.
Recommended Improvements: A six -lane divided highway with
appropriate turning lanes.
Cost: $10,000,000
3. That the Board of Supervisors request that the Commonwealth of Virginia
create an expanded pool of funds to meet increasing transportation needs
throughout the state.
On motion of Supervisor Harrison to adopt the resolution, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
3
Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections
Fred Altizer, District Engineer, VDOT
The Honorable Shirley J. Wbara, Secretary of Transportation
and Chairman, Commonwealth Transportation Board
Lorinda G. Lionberger, Salem District, Commonwealth Transportation Board
Dave Gehr, Commissioner, Department of Transportation
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998
ORDINANCE 032498-7 TO VACATE AND RELEASE PROPERTY
INTERESTS CONVEYED TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS IN
CONNECTION WITH ROADS, STREETS, ALLEYS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY,
AND PUBLIC ACCESS IN AND AROUND PINKARD COURT SUBDIVISION
WHEREAS, by instruments dated March 19, 1983, and March 1, 1985, and
recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed
Book 1221, page 1410, and Deed Book 1221, page 1413, respectively, the owners of
properties bordering on each side of Washington Road along the southwestern boundary
of Pinkard Court Subdivision executed their consent to give unto Roanoke County, without
compensation, each as to the lands by him owned, an easement and right-of-way for said
road/street to be 40 feet in width, including an additional 10' strip along the southwest side
of Washington Road, together with such additional widths as may be necessary for slopes,
ditches and drainage facilities, in order for said road to be established as a part of the
state secondary road system; and,
WHEREAS, by instruments dated March 19, .1983, and March 1, 1985, and
recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 1221, page 1407, and Deed Book
1221, page 1404, respectively, the owners of properties bordering on each side of the
portion of Valley Avenue beginning about .02 miles southwest of Booker Road and
extending in a southwesterly direction about .05 mile to Washington Road in Pinkard Court
Subdivision, executed their consent to give unto Roanoke County, without compensation,
each as to the lands by him owned, an easement and right-of-way for said road/street to
be 40 feet in width, including an additional 7.5 feet on each side of the designated portion
of Valley Avenue, together with such additional widths as may be necessary for slopes,
ditches and drainage facilities, in order for said road to be established as a part of the
state secondary road system; and,
WHEREAS, by instrument dated January 19, 1985, and recorded in the aforesaid
Clerk's Office in Deed Book 1221, page 1416, the owners of properties bordering on each
side of the portion of Pinkard Street (also known as Pinkard Avenue), extending from
Booker Road (Route 878) in a southwesterly direction about .05 mile to a new turn -around,
in Pinkard Court Subdivision, executed their consent to give unto Roanoke County, without
compensation, each as to the lands by him owned, an easement and right-of-way for said
road/street to be 40 feet in width, including an are of land on each side of Pinkard Street
for the cul-de-sac, together with such additional widths as may be necessary for slopes,
ditches and drainage facilities, in order for said road to be established as a part of the
state secondary road system; and,
WHEREAS, by deed dated September 2, 1996, and recorded in the aforesaid
Clerk's Office in Deed Book 1531, page 1154, Dennis E. Phelps, et als, conveyed fee
simple title to a 0.037 acre of land, being the northwesterly portion of Lot 4, Block 4,
Pinkard Court Subdivision, to the Board of Supervisors for right-of-way and easement in
connection with the improvement and acceptance of Pinkard Street into the state
secondary road system; and,
WHEREAS, by deed of easement dated January 15, 1974, and recorded in the
aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 988, page 811, Thomas M. Davis, Jr., and Carolyn
2
C. Davis granted and conveyed for the use of the general public a perpetual easement for
foot and vehicle traffic over, across and upon a new 16' alley through Lots 27, 22, and 21,
in Block 1, of Pinkard Court Subdivision, together with an easement for such drainage
ditches as are necessary to drain any road established across said alley, said easements
being to replace the alleys vacated by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors by
Ordinance adopted on December 11, 1973, all as shown on a plat attached to said deed
of easement; and,
WHEREAS, by deed dated November 21, 1949, and recorded in the aforesaid
Clerk's Office in Deed Book 429, page 31, W. M. Jernigan, Jr., and Vala Jernigan,
husband and wife, conveyed unto the State of Virginia a twelve -foot (12') strip of land
along the southerly side of Lot 12, Section 1, Pinkard Court, and by deed dated December
8, 1949, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 429, page 33, Joseph
W. Nackley conveyed unto the Commonwealth of Virginia a twelve -foot (12') strip of land
along the southerly side of Lot 13, Section 1, Pinkard Court, said conveyances being
adjacent to, and parallel with Summit Avenue and for purposes of widening Summit
Avenue on the northerly side thereof; and,
WHEREAS, due to the proposed acquisition and development of the lots in Pinkard
Court Subdivision and surrounding properties, and in view of the vacation of the public
rights-of-way shown on the plat of Pinkard Court Subdivision in Plat Book 1, Page 363, by
Ordinance #021098-9 adopted by the Board of Supervisors on February 10, 1998, and the
abandonment of those sections of said rights-of-way in the state secondary road system
by Resolution #021098-8, the Board deems the above-described real estate interests no
97
longer necessary for the County or for the public, and the County has no current or future
use for these interests.
THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County
Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance.
A first reading of this ordinance was held on March 10, 1998; and a second reading was
held on March 24, 1998; and,
2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke
County, the real estate interests hereinabove described are hereby declared to be surplus,
and the nature of said interests render them unacceptable and unavailable for other public
uses; and,
3. That, subject to the conditions contained in Paragraph 7, all right, title and
interest acquired by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, by instruments
dated March 19, 1983, and March 1, 1985, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit
Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Deed Book 1221, page 1410, and Deed Book 1221,
page 1413, respectively, for Washington Road, by instruments dated March 19, 1983, and
March 1, 1985, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 1221, page
1407, and Deed Book 1221, page 1404, respectively, for Valley Avenue, and by instrument
dated January 19, 1985, and recorded in Deed Book 1221, page 1416, for Pinkard Street
(also known as Pinkard Avenue), be, and hereby is, vacated and released; and,
4
4. That, subject to the conditions contained in Paragraph 7, the northwesterly
portion of Lot 4, Block 4, Pinkard Court, consisting of 0.037 acre, be, and hereby is,
vacated and released as a right-of-way and easement for acceptance of Pinkard Street
into the secondary road system, and the County Administrator or any Assistant County
Administrator is hereby authorized to re -convey said parcel to the owner of Lot 4, Block
4, Pinkard Court, as of the time such conveyance is made, said parcel to be added and
combined with Lot 4, by deed or by plat, in compliance with the Roanoke County
Subdivision Ordinances, and other applicable laws and regulations; and,
5. That, subject to the conditions contained in Paragraph 7, the new 16' alley
through Lots 27, 22 and 21, in Block 1, Pinkard Court, conveyed as a perpetual easement
for use of the general public by deed of easement dated January 15, 1974, and recorded
in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 988, page 811, be and hereby is, vacated and
released; and,
6. That, subject to the conditions contained in Paragraph 7, all right, title and
interest of the County or the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, which may
have been acquired by virtue of the deeds dated November 21, 1949, and December 8,
1949, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 429, page 31, and Deed
Book 429, page 33, respectively, for the widening of Summit Avenue be, and hereby is,
vacated and released; and,
7. That this ordinance shall be subject to the following conditions:
a. That fee simple title to all of the lots in Pinkard Court Subdivision as
shown on Plat Book 1, Page 363 (except Lots 1, 2, and 3 in Block 1
5
which are not affected by this action), to a parcel of land currently
owned by Rowena P. Jernigan (Deed Book 1288, Page 803)
designated on the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map No.
87.08-3-1, and to a parcel of land consisting of 21.686 acres, more or
less, and being a portion of a tract of land currently owned by
Craighead Real Estate (Deed Book 1388, Page 1311; Will Book 44,
Page 1447) designated on the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax
Map No. 77.20-1-42 and a portion of Tax Map No. 77.20-1-43, shall
be acquired by Interstate Development, L.L.C., or its assignee
(Lowe's Companies, Inc.), in one common ownership and all of said
lots or parcels shall be added and combined into one tract or parcel
of land, with other parcels added if necessary or desired, within four
months from the date of the adoption of this ordinance.
b. That a new public right-of-way from Franklin Road (Route 220) and
extending to Washington Avenue be dedicated and the appropriate
guarantee be provided to the County of Roanoke for the construction
of the new road to the standards required by the Virginia Department
of Transportation (VDOT) and for VDOT acceptance of the new road
into the state secondary road system.
C. That all costs and expenses associated herewith, including but not
limited to publication, survey and recordation costs, shall be the
responsibility of Interstate Development, L.L.C., or its assignee
(Lowe's Companies, Inc.); and,
8. That the County Administrator or any Assistant County Administrator is
hereby authorized to execute such other documents and take such further actions on
behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the vacation, release and
relinquishment of said property interests, all of which shall be on form approved by the
County Attorney.
9. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption.
On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following
recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
&"'z, Q " )40 -�4, d -
Brenda J. Holto , Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Vickie L. Huffman, Assistant County Attorney
Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections
7
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998
ORDINANCE 032498-8 AUTHORIZING APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY TO
EXPAND THE USE OF AN EXISTING EASEMENT ACROSS A WELL LOT ON
KENTLAND DRIVE OWNED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
WHEREAS, by Deed of Easement dated May 3, 1950, Appalachian Electric Power
Co. was granted an easement a distance of 1271 feet, more or less, and 100 feet in width
by W. S. Phelps and Eula A. Phelps, his wife, recorded in the Clerk's Office of the County
of Roanoke in Deed Book 437, page 147; and,
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County is now the owner of a
portion of the property formerly owned by W. S. Phelps and Eula A. Phelps and is
designated as a well lot on Kentland Drive, Tax Map No. 76.12-8-25; and,
WHEREAS, a portion of the easement granted to Appalachian Electric Power Co.
(APCO) by W. S. Phelps and Eula A. Phelps crosses the County's well lot on Kentland
Drive; and,
WHEREAS, Appalachian Power Company (APCO) has requested authorization to
expand the use of the existing easement across the well lot on Kentland Drive to allow a
telecommunications antenna and related facilities of Ohio State Cellular Phone Company,
Inc., to be located on an existing transmission line tower as shown on APCO Drawing No.
R-3313, dated December 22, 1997.
THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County
Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by ordinance.
A first reading of this ordinance was held on March 10, 1998; and a second reading was
held on March 24, 1998.
2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke
County, the interests in real estate to be conveyed are hereby declared to be surplus, and
are hereby made available for other public uses by conveyance to Appalachian Power
Company for the provision of electrical service in connection with installation of a
telecommunications antenna and related facilities on an existing electric transmission line
tower.
3. That the conveyance of the expanded use of the right-of-way for an
underground service line(s) and related facilities to electric service for a
telecommunications antenna, as shown on APCO Drawing No. R-3313, dated December
22, 1997, to Appalachian Power Company for the sum of Twelve Thousand Dollars
($12,000.00) is hereby authorized.
4. That the County Administrator or an Assistant County Administrator is hereby
authorized to execute such documents and take such further actions as may be necessary
to accomplish this conveyance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County
Attorney.
5. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption.
On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following
recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson
IPA
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
20i:t�& (a 14�
Brenda J. Holt n, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
Gary Robertson, Director, Utility
Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections
3
ro
EXISTING OVERHEAD UNE
CORDELS DRIVE
I PROPOSED
UNDERGROUND
SERVICE
I
IECELLULAR
METI
TRANSMISSION TOWER 15
I 191
I
I
1
I
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
T. D. 665000
MAP 3780-300 A4
Q' 50, inn,
Q
ccO
t
O
cr
U
x
c
z
I
c .s EXISTING POLE I
®j
300-=
I
I
f
I
I
I -
I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I
FOXHALL CIR.
APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY
PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY
ON PROPERTY OF
BOARD- OF SUPERVISORS
OF ROANOKE COUNTY
DRAWN BY LMA DATE 12-22-97
APP. BY MJM I SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 1 OF 1
DRAWING N0.:-- R-3313
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998
RESOLUTION 032498-9 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN
ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS
DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM I - CONSENT AGENDA
as follows:
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia,
1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for
March 24, 1998, designated as Item I- Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and
concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1
through 4, inclusive, as follows:
1. Approval of minutes - February 10, 1998, February 12, 1998,
February 24, 1998 and March 10, 1998.
2. Confirmation of committee appointment to Roanoke Valley Greenway
Commission.
3. Resolution requesting approval by the Virginia Department of
Transportation of two proposed welcome signs and a landscaped
planting area in the Clearbrook community within a public right of
right in Roanoke County.
4. Request to donate a surplus water tank to Franklin County Parks &
Recreation.
2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where
required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any
such item pursuant to this resolution.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Consent Resolution with Item 9
added, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Brenda J. Ho on, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning and Zoning
Gary Robertson, Director, Utility
2
A -032498-9.a
ACTION NUMBER
ITEM NUMBER --Z
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: March 24, 1998
SUBJECT: Confirmation of appointment to the Roanoke Valley Greenway
Commission
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The following nomination was made at the March 10, 1998 Board meeting and
should now be confirmed.
Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission
Supervisor Harrison nominated Richard Kelly to serve another three year term
which will expire April 8, 2001.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the above appointment be confirmed by the Board of
Supervisors.
SUBMITTED BY:
Brenda J. H Iton
Deputy Clerk
APPROVED BY:
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
1
4
Approved (x)
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred ( )
To ( )
ACTION
We
Motion by: Bob L. Johnson to approve Harrison
Johnson
McNamara _
Minnix _
Nickens
cc: File
Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission File
2
VOTE
Yes Abs
x
x
x _
x
x
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998
RESOLUTION 032498-9.1b REQUESTING APPROVAL BY THE VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OF TWO PROPOSED WELCOME SIGNS
AND A LANDSCAPED PLANTING AREA IN THE CLEARBROOK COMMUNITY
WITHIN A PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY IN ROANOKE COUNTY
WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation shall review specifications
for the design, installation and maintenance of community welcome signs and landscape
plantings in highway medians at particular locations in Roanoke County, and
WHEREAS, Roanoke County has previously selected, received approval for,
established and maintained numerous community welcome signs and gateway
beautification sites on primary highways, and
WHEREAS, the Clearbrook community has indicated its desire for, and the Board
of Supervisors hereby expresses its willingness to fund the design and installation of this
project - sum total not to exceed $3,500 - and that the Board of Supervisors will provide
for the perpetual maintenance of this project in lieu of a permit
fee or continuous bond.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia requests that the Virginia Department of Transportation approve the
submitted specifications and permit community welcome signs at the following locations;
said permit to include approval of a landscaped planting area at location (2) specified
herein:
(1) U.S. 220 north of the Blue Ridge Parkway
(2) U.S. 220 at VA 958 (Dunahoo Drive)
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Brenda J. Hol n, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning
Virginia Department of Transportation
A -032498-9.c
ACTION #
ITEM NUMBER —
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: March 24, 1998
AGENDA ITEM: Request to Donate a Surplus Water Tank to Franklin County Parks &
Recreation
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
� EM E001 0% Z I
BACKGROUND:
In the fall of 1997, we were contacted by staff at Franklin County concerning the possible availability
of a used water tank. They are in the process of developing a park with rest rooms and a concession
stand and are in need of a small water tank (app. 5,000 gallons).
At the time of the request we had no surplus tanks that would be suitable for their needs.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
By connecting the Green Hill subdivision to the south transmission line this winter, we have
eliminated a small water system that was served by two wells. This water system included a small
water tank that needs to be removed.
Our staff has obtained cost estimates for the removal and disposal of the tank as shown below:
Hauling Tank
$200.00
Crane Rental
250.00
Labor
408.00
Salvage Value
(180,00)
TOTAL COST JE8.00
The tank is approximately 25 years old and the 10,000 gallon capacity is not adequate for water
systems requiring fire protection. Therefore, the tank is not suitable for reuse in Roanoke County's
system.
Franklin County was contacted and asked if they would be interested in the tank with the condition
that they pay all costs associated with the removal. Their staff has inspected the tank and agreed to
pay all costs associated with removing the tank.
FISCAL EMPACT:
The Utility Department has no need for this tank and will save approximately $678.00 if the tank is
donated.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The size, age and condition of the tank makes the tank of no value to the Utility Department. Staff
would recommend donation of the tank to Franklin County.
SUBMITTED BY:
Ga��bertson, P.E.
Utility Director
APPROVED:
Z K�C4�
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
No Yes Abs
Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson to approve Harrison _ x
Denied () Johnson _ x _
Received () McNamara _ x _
Referred () Minnix — x _
To () Nickens — x
cc: File
Gary Robertson, Director, Utility
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998
RESOLUTION 032498-10 CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN
CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has
convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and
in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification
by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was
conducted in conformity with Virginia law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge:
1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting
requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this
certification resolution applies, and
2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion
convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Certification Resolution, and carried
by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Brenda J. Ho on, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Executive Session
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998
RESOLUTION 032498-11 OF CONGRATULATIONS TO WILLIAM BYRD HIGH
SCHOOL GIRLS BASKETBALL TEAM FOR WINNING GROUP AA STATE
BASKETBALL CHAMPIONSHIP
WHEREAS, team sports are an important part of the curriculum at schools in
Roanoke County, teaching cooperation, sportsmanship and athletic skill; and
WHEREAS, the William Byrd High School Girls Basketball Team won the Group AA
state basketball championship this year, overcoming a 10 -point deficit to beat Turner
Ashby by 57-54; and
WHEREAS, Brandy Allen, who scored 30 points during the championship game,
was named AA Player of the Year in Virginia, First Team All State, First Team All Region,
First Team All District, and District and Region Player of the Year; and Andrea Gay was
named to the First Team All District; and
WHEREAS, the William Byrd High School Girls Basketball Team's record for the
season was 29 wins and one loss; and
WHEREAS, Coach Richard Thrasher was named AA Coach of the Year for the
State of Virginia.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, does hereby extend its sincere congratulations to the members of the
William Byrd High School Girls Basketball Team: Kara Norcross, Dawn Chewning, Erin
Caldwell, Whitney Yates, Sarah Moore, Lara Nester, Stephanie Parnell, Andrea Gay,
Brandy Allen, Brennan Sigel, Nicole Bailey, Courtney Ross, J. J. McKinney, and Jackie
1
Killen; Managers, Glenn Rife, Justin Mitchell and Kellen Williams; and Coaches, Richard
Thrasher, Debbie Williams -Arthur, Robin Hungate, Garry Saunders, and Tammy
Newcomb, for their athletic ability, their team spirit, and their commitment to each other;
M
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors extends its best wishes
to the the team, the coaches, and the school in their future endeavors.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
'61.0"A.0 )z�� ..
Brenda J. Holt n, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Dr. Deanna Gordon, School Superintendent
Resolutions of Congratulations File
2
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998
ORDINANCE 032498-12 AMENDING AND REENACTING THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA BY THE
ADOPTION OF THE ROANOKE VALLEY REGIONAL STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT PLAN AS PART OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
WHEREAS, Roanoke County and other jurisdictions within the Roanoke Valley
have experienced a recurrent history of flooding of properties; and,
WHEREAS, this flooding has resulted in the loss of property and the disruption of
the lives of many Roanoke County citizens; and,
WHEREAS, Roanoke County and other Valley jurisdictions have cooperatively
joined together to fund and prepare the Roanoke Valley Regional Stormwater
Management Plan (The Plan); and,
WHEREAS, the Plan was prepared under the coordination of the Fifth Planning
District Commission, and involved the extensive involvement of citizen and technical
advisory committees; and,
WHEREAS, the Plan is future oriented and addresses flooding, stormwater, and
drainage issues within sixteen priority watersheds within the Roanoke Valley; and,
WHEREAS, the Plan specifically provides an enhancement to the 1993 FEMA
Flood Insurance Study, incorporates recommended stormwater master plans for each of
the sixteen priority watersheds, contains specific recommendations for multi jurisdictional
projects and policies, and contains recommended implementation strategies that if
implemented, will reduce existing flooding problems and minimize future damages for
1
many citizens within Roanoke County; and,
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission reviewed the Plan on March
3, 1998 and after holding a public hearing, has recommended the incorporation of the Plan
as part of the Roanoke County Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, first reading of this ordinance was held on March 10, 1998 and second
reading was held on March 24, 1998
BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia as
follows:
1. That Roanoke County, Virginia accepts the analysis, design and flood
reduction recommendations contained within the Plan and appends the Comprehensive
Plan of Roanoke County to include these components of the Plan; and,
2. That the Plan shall be used a general guide for implementing the
recommended improvements as future funding sources are identified and funding is
allocated for specific projects; and,
3. That this ordinance shall be in effect from and after March 24, 1998
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
2
.
cc:
File
Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning
George Simpson, Assistant Director, Planning & Zoning
Mary F. Parker, Clerk, City of Roanoke
Forest Jones, Clerk, City of Salem
Carolyn Ross, Clerk, Town of Vinton
Wayne Strickland, Executive Director, Fifth Planning District Commission
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998
ORDINANCE 032498-13 AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 10-33.
REAL ESTATE SERVICES. SECTION 10-34. PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES. AND SECTION 10-36. PERSONAL AND BUSINESS SERVICE
OCCUPATIONS., OF ARTICLE II. CLASSIFIED BUSINESS AND
OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE PROVISIONS, OF CHAPTER 10, LICENSES,
TO INCREASE THE GROSS RECEIPTS FROM $3,000.00 TO $5,000.00
FOR THE EXEMPTION FROM PAYMENT OF A LICENSE FEE
WHEREAS, Section 10-33, 'Real estate services" of the Roanoke County Business,
Professional, and Occupational License (BPOL) Ordinance provides for imposition of the
business license tax in the amount of $0.58 per $100.00 of gross receipts from the
business during the preceding calendar year, with such services being defined in
subsection (b) and specifically designated in subsection (c) of Section 10-33; and,
WHEREAS, Section 10-34, "Professional services" of the BPOL Ordinance provides
for imposition of the business license tax in the amount of $0.58 per $100.00 of gross
receipts from the occupation during the preceding calendar year, with such services being
defined in subsection (b) of Section 10-34; and,
WHEREAS, Section 10-36, "Personal and Business Service Occupations" of the
BPOL Ordinance provides for imposition of the business license tax in the amount of $0.36
per $100.00 of gross receipts from the occupation during the preceding calendar year, with
such services being defined in subsection (b) and specifically designated in subsection (c)
of Section 10-36; and,
WHEREAS, these classifications include retired, part-time, or juvenile individuals,
and individuals who maintain a license merely to prevent such license from lapsing; and,
WHEREAS, by Ordinance #91493-8, the Board of Supervisors approved an
exemption from the business license tax for individuals generating less than $3,000.00 in
gross receipts in each of the aforesaid classifications, based upon a determination that the
time and expense incurred by the Commissioner of Revenue's Office in processing
licenses for such individuals is not cost effective; and,
WHEREAS, upon adoption of Ordinance #062596-9 to impose a license fee (rather
than a license tax) on businesses with gross receipts less than $100,000.00, the Board
maintained the exemption through provisos that every person whose gross receipts in the
preceding calendar year are less than $3,000.00 in the above-specified classifications
shall pay the $50.00 license fee upon commencement of the business and initial
application for a license and shall be exempt thereafter from paying a license fee or tax,
as long as such person continues to qualify for the exemption and otherwise complies with
the BPOL Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors deems it appropriate, in order to improve cost
effectiveness and fairness in the administration of the BPOL Ordinance, to increase the
gross receipts' threshold from $3,000.00 to $5,000.00 for the exemption from the license
fee in the classifications of real estate services, professional services, and personal and
business service occupations.
WHEREAS, a first reading of this ordinance was held on March 10, 1998; and the
second reading and public hearing was held on March 24, 1998.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the County
of Roanoke, Virginia, as follows:
2
t
1. That Section 10-33 Real Estate Services., Section 10-34. Professional
Services. and Section 10-36 Personal and business service occupations. of Article 11.
Classified Business and Occupational License Provisions, of Chapter 10, LICENSES, be
amended and reenacted as follows:
Sec. 10-33. Real estate services.
(a) The annual license tax imposed hereunder for real estate services shall be in
the amount of fifty-eight cents ($0.58) per one hundred dollars ($100.00) of gross receipts
from the business during the preceding calendar year. Every person whose gross receipts
...................... .... r :.:..:00<00
za t
hfeet...l.........................................
in the precedingcalendar year shall be less than
..................................................
thousand do"ars ($3,000.90) from any real estate service shall pay the license fee of fifty
dollars ($50.00) imposed in § 10-3(a) of this chapter upon commencement of the business
and initial application for a license and shall thereafter be exempt from the payment of a
license fee or tax, provided that such person continues to qualify for this exemption and
otherwise complies with the requirements of this chapter.
Sec. 10-34. Professional services.
(a) The annual license tax imposed hereunder for professional services shall be in
the amount of fifty-eight cents ($0.58) per one hundred dollars ($100.00) of gross receipts
from the occupation during the preceding calendar year. Every person whose gross
receipts in the preceding calendar year shall be less than
...............................
rt431from any professional service shall pay the
license fee of fifty dollars ($50.00) imposed in § 10-3(a) of this chapter upon
3
i
commencement of the business and initial application for a license and shall thereafter be
exempt from the payment of a license fee or tax, provided that such person continues to
qualify for this exemption and otherwise complies with the requirements of this chapter.
Sec. 10-36. Personal and business service occupations.
(a) The annual license tax imposed hereunder for personal or business services,
and all other businesses and occupations not specifically listed or excepted in this chapter
of the Roanoke County Code or the Code of Virginia, shall be in the amount of thirty-six
cents ($0.36) per one hundred dollars ($100.00) of gross receipts from the occupation
during the preceding calendar year. Every person whose gross receipts in the preceding
calendar year shall be less than
.......................................d.................................Q..............
�.;;
($3;980:66) from any personal or business service shall pay the license fee of fifty dollars
($50.00) imposed in § 10-3(a) of this chapter upon commencement of the business and
initial application for a license and shall thereafter be exempt from the payment of a
license fee or tax, provided that such person continues to qualify for this exemption and
otherwise complies with the requirements of this chapter.
2. This ordinance shall be effective from and after July 1, 1998.
On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following
recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
5
A COPY TESTE:
Brenda J. HoItcffi, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
Circuit Court
Roy B. Willett, Judge
Clifford R. Weckstein, Judge
Diane McQ. Strickland, Judge
Richard C. Pattisall, Judge
Robert P. Doherty, Jr., Judge
Jonathan M. Apgar, Judge
Steven A. McGraw, Clerk
Juvenile Domestic Relations District Court
Joseph M. Clarke, 11, Judge
Philip Trompeter, Judge
John B. Ferguson, Judge
Joseph P. Bounds, Judge
Ruth P. Bates, Clerk
Intake Counsellor
General District Court
George W. Harris, Judge
William Broadhurst, Judge
Vincent Lilley, Judge
Julian H. Raney, Judge
Jacqueline F. Ward Talevi, Judge
Theresa A. Childress, Clerk
Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney
Magistrates Sherri Krantz/Betty Perry
Main Library
Richard Burch, Chief of Fire & Rescue
Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke 24016
Roanoke County Law Library, Singleton Osterhoudt
Roanoke County Code Book
Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff
John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator
Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator
Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance
0. Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections
Terrance L. Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning
Gary Robertson, Director, Utility
Michael Lazzuri, Court Services
William J. Rand, III, Director, General Services
Thomas S. Haislip, Director, Parks & Recreation
Elaine Carver, Director, Procurement
John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment
Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer
R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue
r
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998
ORDINANCE 032498-14 DECLARING A PARCEL OF REAL
ESTATE TO BE SURPLUS AND ACCEPTING AN OFFER FOR THE
SALE OF SAME; NAMELY THE ARLINGTON HILLS #2 WELL LOT
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as
follows:
1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke
County, the subject property, having been made available for other public uses before
permitting disposition by sale, is hereby declared to be surplus.
2. That an advertisement for bids for the sale of this surplus real estate was
advertised in the Roanoke Times & World News on March 17, 1998; that notice has been
mailed to adjoining property owners; and that a sign announcing the proposed sale of this
surplus real estate has been posted on the property.
3. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke
County, a first reading of this ordinance was held on March 10, 1998, and the second
reading was held on March 24, 1998, concerning the disposition of the following parcel of
real estate identified as follows:
Arlington Hills #2 Well Lot Tax Map Parcel No. 86.12-3-16
4. That offers for said properties having been received, the offer of
S. Douglas Freeman to purchase this property for the sum of Fifty Eight Thousand Five
Hundred Dollars ($58.500.00) is hereby accepted.
5. That the purchase price for the property will be paid upon delivery of a deed
therefor and all proceeds from the sale of this real estate are to be paid into the utility
capital improvements fund.
6. That the County Administrator or an Assistant County Administrator is hereby
authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County
as are necessary to accomplish the sale of said property, all of which will be on form
approved by the County Attorney.
7. That this ordinance will be effective on and from the date of its adoption.
On motion of Supervisor McNamara to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
&tk'6L Q. ���
Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Gary Robertson, Director, Utility
John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment
Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
2
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER, TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998
ORDINANCE 032498-15 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF
17 ACRES OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED IN THE 6600 BLOCK OF
MERRIMAN ROAD (PORTIONS OF TAX MAP NO. 97.01-2-10, 97.01-2-11,
97.01-2-12 AND 97.05-1-1) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL
DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS OF 1-1, C -2C AND C-2,
TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1, FOR PARKS AND
RECREATIONAL AREAS, UPON THE APPLICATION OF THE ROANOKE
COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 24, 1998, and
the second reading and public hearing was held on March 24, 1998; and,
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on
this matter on March 3, 1998; and
WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as
follows:
1. That the zoning classification of real estate containing 17 acres, as described
herein, and located in the 6600 block of Merriman Road (Portions of Tax Map Numbers
97.01-2-10, 97.01-2-11, 97.01-2-12 AND 97.05-1-1) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District,
is hereby changed from the zoning classifications of 1-1, C -2C and C-2, to the zoning
classification of R-1, in order to develop a public park and recreational area.
2. That this action is taken upon the application of The Roanoke County
Board of Supervisors.
3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows:
Commencing at a point on the westerly right-of-way line of Merriman
Road (Virginia Secondary Route #613) said point being referenced
as corner 1 on the plat showing "Rezoning Exhibit of Tract 1 (16.784
AC.), Prepared for The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Cave Spring Magisterial District, Roanoke County, Virginia" prepared
by Lumsden Associates, P.C., dated February 26, 1998, and also
being the POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein described tract;
Thence with the westerly right-of-way line of Merriman Road (Virginia
Secondary Route #613) along the arc of a curve to the right 160.44 feet, said
curve having a radius of 547.96 feet, an included angle of 16°46'33", and a
chord bearing S 8°32'10" E, 159.87 feet to a point, corner 2;
Thence leaving the westerly right-of-way line of Merriman Road (Virginia
Secondary Route #613) and with eleven (11) proposed new division lines
the following courses and distances; along the arc of a curve to the left 66.02
feet, said curve having a radius of 35.00 feet, an included angle of
108°04'36", and a chord bearing N 5401112" W, 56.66 feet to a point,
corner 3;
Thence S 71046'30" W, 7.12 feet to a point, corner 4;
Thence along the arc of a curve to the left 88.36 feet, said curve having a
radius of 225.00 feet, an included angle of 22°30'00", and a chord bearing
S 60°31'30" W, 87.79 feet to a point, corner 5;
Thence S 49016'30" W, 139.19 feet to a point, corner 6;
Thence along the arc of a curve to the right 166.90 feet, said curve having
a radius of 425.00 feet, an included angle of 22°30'00", and a chord bearing
S 60°31'30" W, 165.83 feet to a point, corner 7;
Thence S 71 046'30" W, 589.47 feet to a point, corner 8;
Thence S 29033'59" E, 302.78 feet to a point, corner 9;
Thence S 14°38'21" E, 288.15 feet to a point, corner 10;
Thence S 41 041'33" W, 48.04 feet to a point, corner 11;
Thence S 1 ° 12'22" W, 109.54 feet to a point, corner 12;
Thence S 20 13'43" E, 162.31 feet to a point, corner 13;
Thence S 14001'56" W, 109.58 feet to a point on an existing property line,
corner 14;
Thence with existing property lines the following six (6) courses and
distances; S 77003'00" W, 312.24 feet to a point, corner 15;
Thence N 40007'00" W, 603.30 feet to a point, corner 16;
Thence N 25027'00" W, 425.40 feet to a point, corner 17;
Thence N 71046'30" E, 1,274.62 feet to a point, corner 18;
Thence N 17038'36" W, 169.42 feet to a point, corner 19;
Thence N 72021'24" E, 486.85 feet to a point, corner 1, the POINT OF
BEGINNING and containing 16.784 acres, more or less.
2
6. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this
ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed
to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized
by this ordinance.
On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following
recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
A J-�
Brenda J. Hol on, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning
Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections
John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
3
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998
ORDINANCE 032498-16 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO THE
SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE COUNTY TO ALLOW THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, LOCATED AT
5437 CRUMPACKER DRIVE (TAX PARCEL 40.01-1-4.1), HOLLINS
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the School Board of Roanoke County, Virginia, has filed a petition to
allow the construction of a new elementary school at 5437 Crumpacker Drive, in the
Hollins Magisterial District; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on
March 3, 1998; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first
reading on this matter on February 24, 1998; the second reading and public hearing on
this matter was held on March 24, 1998; and
WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to allow the
construction of a new elementary school located at 5437 Crumpacker Drive in the Hollins
Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan
pursuant to the provisions of § 15.2-2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended.
2. That the Board hereby grants a Special Use Permit to the School Board of
Roanoke County, Virginia, to allow the construction of a new elementary school located
at 5437 Crumpacker Drive in the Hollins Magisterial District.
3. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this
ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Brenda J. Holto , Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning
Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections
John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
2
� DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING
AND ZONING
s=
0
! • Wu
SPECIAL USE PERMIT
TAX .MAP # 40.01-1-4,1
4
103.82 dot01
50.48 do fCl
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER, TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998
ORDINANCE 032498-17 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF
A 9.77 -ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT THE SOUTH SIDE
OF WOOD HAVEN ROAD APPROXIMATELY .05 MILE EAST OF ITS
INTERSECTION WITH GREEN RIDGE ROAD (TAX MAP NOS. 37.05-1-1
AND 37.05-1-2) IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE
ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1, CONDITIONAL, TO THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION OF R-1, UPON THE APPLICATION OF GRAHAM -
THOMAS CORPORATION
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 24, 1998, and
the second reading and public hearing was held on March 24, 1998; and,
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on
this matter on March 3, 1998; and
WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as
follows:
1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 9.77
acres, as described herein, and located at the south side of Wood Haven Road
approximately 0.5 mile east of its intersection with Green Ridge Road (Tax Map Numbers
37.05-1-1 and 37.05-1-2) in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the
zoning classification of R-1, Conditional, to the zoning classification of R-1, Low Density
Residential District.
2. That this action is taken upon the application of Graham -Thomas
Corporation.
3. That in 1988 rezoning of this property the owner of the property voluntarily
proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, accepted and the Petitioner/Owner is now requesting be removed:
4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point on the southerly right-of-way of Wood Haven Road (Virginia
Secondary Route 628) being a common corner of the property of Minnie G. Lewis
and Stafford Lewis, as recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 589,
page 196, the northwesterly corner of the point of Beginning in the herein -described
tract; thence leaving the aforesaid southerly right-of-way of Wood Haven Road
(Virginia Secondary Route 628) with the common line of the aforesaid Lewis
property (DB 589, page 196) and the herein -described tract, S. 480 42' 49" E.
passing the common corner of the aforesaid Lewis property (DB 589, page 196)
and the property of Ebenezer Baptist Church as recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's
Office in DB 1125, page 664 and passing the a common corner of the aforesaid
Ebenezer Baptist Church Property (DB 1125, page 664) and the property of Roy E.
Lewis and Christine E. Lewis, DB 1120, page 161, in all a total distance of 888.35'
feet to an existing set stone; said point being a common corner of Roanoke County
School Board as recorded in DB 597, page 112 and the northeasterly corner of the
herein -described tract and on the southerly line of the aforesaid Roy E. Lewis
2
property (DB 1120, page 161); thence leaving the property of the aforesaid Roy E.
Lewis (DB 1120, page 161) and with the common line of the aforesaid Roanoke
County School Board (DB 597, page 112) and herein -described tract, S. 37059,18"
W. a distance of 244.27 feet to an existing set stone, said point being the
southeasterly corner of the herein -described tract; thence continuing with a
common line for the aforesaid Roanoke County School Board (DB 597, page 112)
and the herein -described tract, N. 730 01' 00" W. a distance of 890.55 feet to a
point, said point being the common comer of the aforesaid Roanoke County School
Board (DB 597, page 112) and the property of the Roanoke County Board of
Supervisors as recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in DB 1120, page 228 and
the southwesterly corner of the herein -described tract, being on the northeasterly
line of the property of Duane Williams and Alice D. Williams, as recorded in the
aforesaid Clerk's Office in DB 947, page 572; thence leaving the aforesaid Roanoke
County School Board (DB 597, page 112) and with a common line of the aforesaid
Williams property (DB 947, page 572) and herein -described tract, N. 020 54' 07" W.
a distance of 253.23 feet to a point, said point being a common corner of the
aforesaid Williams property (DB 947, page 572) and the westerly corner of the
herein -described tract and being situated on the southerly right-of-way of the
aforesaid Wood Haven Road (Virginia Secondary Route 628); thence leaving the
Williams property (DB 947, page 572) and with the southerly right-of-way of the
aforesaid Wood Haven Road (Virginia Secondary Route 628) and herein -described
tract, N. 52135' 33" E. 437.29 feet to the point of Beginning, and containing 9.603
acres, more or less, and being further described as Tax Map Nos. 37.05-1-1 and
37.05-1-2.
5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this
ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed
to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized
by this ordinance.
On motion of Supervisor Harrison to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
61.4t -k Q h-41iool,
Brenda J. Holt n,Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning
Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections
John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
M
w+�rwt�G/1LLE�E1C � xitiG570.v`
ro gAvf3
s
'd -A-1
n
MER00' \�j�y\7}la
CX/T,;
C'%
/ �xconawt jw;t t / KS. p�L Y`TM+M..,
;z yQt
FL 7 �f
UIP-10TV ono
w A-- ■ ■ rola■
JAW
unozu
AIr
ROANOKE COUNTY GRAHAM THOMAS SUBDIVISION
r DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT R1 C TO R1
t },
J
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1998
ORDINANCE 032498-18 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO OHIO
STATE CELLULAR PHONE CO., INC. TO CONSTRUCT A
COMMUNICATIONS TOWER ON A 3.171 ACRE PARCEL AT 5585
CATAWBA HOSPITAL DRIVE (TAX MAP NO. 7.00-1-29), CATAWBA
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
WHEREAS, Ohio State Cellular Phone Co., Inc. has filed a petition to construct a
communications tower located at 5585 Catawba Hospital Drive (Tax Map No. 7.00-1-29) in
the Catawba Magisterial District; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, approved a Special
Use Permit on November 18, 1997, contingent upon the acquisition of an additional three
acres from the Commonwealth of Virginia by December 16, 1997; and
WHEREAS, the additional three acres was not acquired by December 16, 1997, and
the Special Use Permit became null and void; and
WHEREAS, by deed dated February 11, 1998, the Commonwealth of Virginia granted
the three acre parcel to the County of Roanoke, Virginia; and
WHEREAS, Ohio State Cellular Phone Co., Inc. has resubmitted the Special Use
Permit petition with the same conditions approved by the Board of Supervisors on
November 18,1997; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on
March 3, 1998, and requested that condition number (2) pertaining to visibility of the tower
be revised to delete the word "painted"; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first reading
on this matter on February 24, 1998; the second reading and public hearing on this matter
was held on March 24, 1998; and
WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Ohio State
Cellular Phone Co., Inc. to construct a communications tower located at 5585 Catawba
Hospital Drive (Tax Map No. 7.00-1-29) in the Catawba Magisterial District is substantially
in accord with the adopted 1985 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the provisions of
§ 15.2-2232 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is
hereby approved with the following conditions:
(1) The height of the tower structure, excluding any antenna attached to the
structure, shall be not more than 190 feet.
(2) The tower structure and all attached support hardware shall be painted
a flat matted color so as to better blend into the landscape and reduce
visibility and light reflection.
(3) No lighting shall be installed on the tower structure or equipment
building except for security lighting not to exceed a height of 25 feet in
height, except as may be required by the FAA or other governmental or
regulatory agency.
(4) This tower shall be structurally designed to carry sufficient loading and
the site developed to accommodate the additional buildings necessary
to accommodate co -locating of communications equipment of at least
one other vendor/provider in order to minimize the proliferation of towers
in the vicinity of this site. In addition, by executing the special use
2 2
permit requested, the applicant agrees to make the tower available for
lease within the structural capacity of the tower and at reasonable costs
adequate to recover the capital, operating and maintenance costs of the
tower location required for the additional capacity.
(5) If the use of the tower structure for wireless communications is
discontinued, the tower structure shall be dismantled and removed from
the site within 30 days of notice by the County and the special use
permit shall become void.
(6) Any damage to the existing paving for the parking lot, apron, or access
to the fire station resulting from the construction or operation of the
tower, shall be repaired at the expense of the petitioner.
(7) Public emergency communications equipment shall be accommodated
at no expense to the County.
(8) The location of the tower structure and related equipment shall be as
shown on a plat entitled "Catawba Cellular Phone Tower Site Plan,
Roanoke County, Virginia" prepared by LMW, P.C., Engineering,
Architecture, Surveying, dated 11/18/97.
2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon after the receipt and
acceptance by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County of a deed from the
Commonwealth of Virginia for an additional three (3) acres of real estate, which shall be
added and combined to Tax Map No. 7.00-1-29. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in
conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The
Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in
zoning classification authorized by this ordinance.
On motion of Supervisor Harrison to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following
recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
&ZA-e& Q.
Brenda J. Holton,6beputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning
Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections
John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
IH
Ec • • .
SURVEYED PROPERTY UNE
— DEED: LINE
0 SET REBAR
O EXISTING IRON FOUND
NOTES:
1 • THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED WITHOUT
THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE SEARCH AND
THEREFORE MAY NOT SHOW ALL
ENCUMBRANCES.
Z. THIS PROPERTY TTED DOES NOT
FALL WITHINEAIOOLYEAR FLOOD ZONE.
3. THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED FROM AN
ACTUAL ANDI CURRENT FIELD SURVEY.
4. FEMA, FLOOD' ZONE: 'X'
5. LEGAL R�ENCE=. ,D�213 PG 231
!�'�,1� N0: 7.00-1-5
GRAPHIC SCALE
eo
(rNFm)
' HEREB3CERTiFY THIS PLAT OF SURVEY TO
TO THE 18EST OFA MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF
IPS YICIIVTTY MAP
NO SCALE
NOW OR FORMERLY
PROPERTY OF
CATAWBA STATE SANITORIUM
\ D.B. 45 PAGE 350
IPF
V
is :¢NOW OR FORMERLY
PROPERTY OF
CA MA STATE SANITORIUM Proposed
: j:jMB 213 PAGE 231 I0We1
TAX;:MAP,NO. 7.00-1-5 �4i h'LCb \F
1; o� Location ,� o
;i Ii I h°j C PROPERTY OF IPF
ROANOKE COUNTY
i BOARD OF SUPERVISORS /
CATAWBA FIRE STATION 6 sr
TAX MAP NO. 7.00-01-29 �^ '4
jal� •. V p�+� Q��
` IPF .89 acres
oA
3.171 ACRES
IPF 1!
IPS
^A
O
1p
NOW OR FORMERLY �y IFS 9� \
PROPERTY OF
CATAWBA STATE SANITORIUM
J
��`
0.8. 213 PAGE 231 PLAT OF SURVEY
o ,y�
TAX MAP N0. 7.00-1-5 SHOWING
3.171 ACRES
fpsti��. �`� / FOR
� / ROANOKE COUNTY
�
E P , c . / y ��'� BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
LOCATED IN
ENGINEERING • ARCHITECTURE • suRvE=G CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
1192 (540) `345-0675 1401 2nd STREET, S.W. ROANOKE. COUNTY, VIRGINIA
FtLX (540) 342-4456 ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24016 REVISED: 1-22-98 SURVEYED: 12-10-97 COMM! 14372