HomeMy WebLinkAbout7/28/1998 - Adopted Board RecordsAT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 28, 1998
RESOLUTION 072898-1 OF APPRECIATION TO CAREER AND
VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY FIRE &
RESCUE DEPARTMENT FOR PROVIDING ASSISTANCE TO THE
CITIZENS OF BAY COUNTY, FLORIDA
WHEREAS, forest and brush fires caused millions of dollars of damage to property
in the state of Florida during the months of June and July, 1998; and
WHEREAS, due to the extended period during which these fires raged, local fire
crews became exhausted and in need of assistance from personnel from other states; and
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Fire & Rescue Department answered this call for
assistance, and sent a crew of four career and three volunteer firefighters to Bay County,
Florida, along with equipment and apparatus; and
WHEREAS, this crew, consisting of Captain Daryell Sexton, Lennie Atwood, Tim
Solomon, Craig Robertson, Scott Morgan, Dean Peroulas and Alex Murillo, all of whom are
certified by the U.S. Forestry Service, contained fully a complex fire, and helped prevent
any damage to people or property in Bay County; and
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County firefighters faced several dangers in fighting the
fire, including dehydration, heat stroke, and the flames themselves.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, does hereby extend its sincere appreciation to DARYELL SEXTON,
LENNIE ATWOOD, TIM SOLOMON, CRAIG ROBERTSON, SCOTT MORGAN, DEAN
PEROULAS AND ALEX MURILLO for their professional, compassionate and exemplary
1
response and assistance to the citizens of Bay County, Florida; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors does hereby commend
the members of the team for the time, energy and knowledge which they used in
successfully containing the fire.
On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following
recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
)1!51" 0,
Brenda J. Holt(K- CMC
Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Resolutions of Appreciation File
Richard Burch, Chief, Fire & Rescue
Joseph Sgroi, Director, Human Resources
2
A-072898-2
ACTION NO
ITEM NO -4—
AT
AT A REGULAR MEETING OFTBE ABNOARD OOKE OFSUPERVISORS 1VITORA �O �� TER
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE
IN ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, ON TUESDAY,
MEETING DATE: July 28, 1998
ent
AGENDA ITEM: Request approval the for
u chaseappropriation
acres for the Roanoke County Cent rr for
with interest forp
Research & Technology (formerly the Glenn -Mary Farm.)
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
In order for the "product" inventory to meet the future economic needs of Roanoke County, the
Center for Research & Technology will be developed as a site for corporate and technology based
companies to locate. The property is adjacent to Interstate 81, has close proximity to Virginia Tech,
and is 12 miles from the Smart Road in Montgomery County. In line with the economic development
strategy, this center will be targeted as a location for 15 - 20 small to medium businesses that create
new jobs with wages/salaries exceeding $10.00 per hour.
The Department of Economic Development will recruit companies that are seeking to expand or
locate on the same timeline as park development. In the past few months, a boundary survey and a
Phase 11 Environmental Study was completed to satisfaction. Currently, the department is exploring
the use of a Marketing Feasibility Study in addition to developing a Request for Proposal with the
Procurement Department to identify a firm to develop the Plans & Profiles for the site as part of the
preliminary engineering reports.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
On October 19, 1997, the Board of Supervisors adopted an ordinance authorizing the exercise of an
Option to Purchase to authorize the acquisition of the Glenn -Mary Farm. On the same date, the
board appropriated the sum of $1 million from the General Fund Unappropriated Balance and
authorized the necessary documents for financing the remainder of the $3 million purchase price.
Staff requests that the Board of Supervisors authorize an expenditure of $1 million plus $115,300 in
interest from the General Fund Unappropriated Balance as the second of three payments.
E
2E:� -/
FISCAL IMPACT:
Roanoke County has paid $1 million for the Center for Research & Technology in the past twelve
months. An additional $1 million is required as the second payment with $115,300 in interest (the
$115,300 is 5.765% interest calculated on the remaining $2 million.) Funds for this purpose are
available and have been set aside for planning purposes in the General Fund Unappropriated Balance.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Authorize the appropriation of $1,115,300 from the General Fund Unappropriated Balance
to make the second payment with interest for the purchase of 457 acres for the Roanoke
County Center for Research & Technology. Payment should be made on or before November
10, 1998.
2. Decline to appropriate funds for the Roanoke County Center for Research & Technology at
this time.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends alternative No. 1 in order to continue the acquisition of the site for the Roanoke
County Center for Research & Technology for economic development purposes.
Economic Development Specialist
Approved:
Elmer C. Hod e
County Administrator
----------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
No Yes Abs
Motion b Fenton F. Harrison to Harrison — x —
Approved (x) Y� —
Denied () a rove staff recommendation Johnson — x
Received () McNamara — x
Minnix x —
Referred ()
To Nickens — x —
( )
cc: File
Melinda J. Cox, Economic Development Specialist
Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 28, 1998
RESOLUTION 072898-3 APPROVING REQUEST OF $7,500,000 OF
INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BONDS FOR FRIENDSHIP MANOR APARTMENT
VILLAGE CORPORATION FOR THE ACQUISITION, CONSTRUCTION
AND EQUIPPING OF FACILITIES FOR THE RESIDENCE AND CARE OF
THE AGED
WHEREAS, the Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County, Virginia (the
"Authority") has considered the application of Friendship Manor Apartment Village
Corporation (the "Borrower") an organization that is exempt from taxation pursuant to
Section 501 (c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, whose address is
327 Hershberger Road, NW, Roanoke, Virginia 24012, requesting that the Authority issue
up to $7,500,000 of its revenue bonds at one time or from time to time to assist the
Borrower in the financing or refinancing of one or more of the following projects, located
as indicated below in Roanoke County, Virginia: (1) the acquisition, construction and
equipping of a facility for the residence and care of the aged, consisting of 48 independent
living units and related healthcare facilities located on the campus at 327 Hershberger
Road, NW and related capital expenditures to be determined from time to time; (2) the
acquisition, construction and equipping of a facility for the residence and care of the aged,
consisting of 191 assisted living units and 41 independent living units and related
healthcare facilities located on the campus at 6910 Williamson Road and related capital
expenditures to be determined from time to time, and (3) the funding of certain reserve
funds, capitalized interest accounts and costs of issuance as may be necessary to the
proposed issuance of the bonds.
WHEREAS, the Authority has held a public hearing on the Borrower's application
on July 15, 1998.
WHEREAS, Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
"Code"), provides that the governmental unit having jurisdiction over the issuer of private
activity bonds and over the area in which any facility financed with the proceeds of private
activity bonds is located must approve the issuance of the bonds.
WHEREAS, the Authority issues its bonds on behalf of Roanoke County, Virginia
("County"), the facilities to be financed are located in the County and the Board of
Supervisors of the County (the "Board") constitutes the highest elected governmental unit
of the County.
WHEREAS, the Authority has recommended that the Board approve the issuance
of the Bonds.
1
WHEREAS, a copy of the Authority's resolution approving the issuance of the
Bonds, a certificate of the public hearing and a Fiscal Impact Statement have been filed
with the Board.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA:
1. The Board approves the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority for the
benefit of the Borrower, as required by Section 147(f) of the Code and Section 15.2-4907
of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, to permit the Authority to assist the Borrower
in the financing of the Project.
2. The approval of the issuance of the Bonds, as required by said Section
147(f), does not constitute an endorsement to a prospective purchaser of the Bonds of the
creditworthiness of the Project or the Borrower.
3. Pursuant to the limitations contained in Temporary Income Tax Regulations
Section 5f.103 -2(f), this resolution shall remain in effect for a period of three years from
the date of its adoption.
4. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
&A -e& 0, &A�
Brenda J. Ho on, CMC
Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Timothy W. Gubala, Secretary -Treasurer, IDA
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Resolution 072898-3 adopted by the
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors by a unanimous recorded vote on Tuesday, July 28, 1998
Brenda J. Holton, CMC, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
2
A-072898-4
ACTION #
ITEM NUMBER 1 -'---
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: July 28, 1998
AGENDA ITEM: Request for Appropriation of Capital Improvement Project -- Algoma Park
Water Line Replacement
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND:
The Roanoke County Utility Department submitted to the Board of Supervisors a five-year Capital
Improvement Program in 1996. This program addressed aged and undersized water lines that were
in need of replacing. Each year as part of the Utility budget a minimum of $350,000 is allocated
towards funding these projects.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Staff is in the process of preparing the Capital Improvement Projects for the five years following the
year 2000. The Algoma Park Water Line Project is tentatively listed in the five-year plan following
the year 2000. (See attached map).
Our Staff recently received a list of streets in Roanoke County that were being paved this year. The
Algoma Park subdivision streets were on this list. Staff has requested that the repaving of these
streets be delayed one year to allow the water lines to be replaced. VDOT has agreed to delay
resurfacing these streets until the summer of 1999.
Staff is making this request for the following reasons:
(1) The Utility Department averages three water breaks a year in this subdivision. The residents
will be upset that a newly paved street is covered with patches.
(2) The Utility Department is concerned that newly paved streets will be torn up in two years to
install the water lines at that time.
The estimated cost of this project is $95,000.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Funds are available in the Utility Department's Water Unappropriated Fund for this project.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Although this project is not included in the present five-year plan, Staff feels that it will be more
economical and less disruptive to replace the water lines prior to repaving the streets. Staff
recommends that the project be approved and $95,000 be allocated for this project from the Utility
Department Water Unappropriated Fund.
SUBMITTED BY:
Gary Robeson, P.E.
Utility Dir ctor
APPROVED:
4es.-I X_��
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
ACTION VOTE
No Yes Abs
Approved ()o Motion by: H. Odell Minnix to approve Johnson _
Denied () staff recommendation Harrison _ x
Received () McNamara_ x
Referred () Minnix _ x _
To () Nickens _ x _
cc: File
Gary Robertson, Director, Utility
Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance
10
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 28, 1998
ORDINANCE 072898-5 AUTHORIZING THE CREATION OF AND
FINANCING FOR A LOCAL PUBLIC WORKS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT,
ORANDER DRIVE AND GIESER ROAD SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION
WHEREAS, Ordinance 112288-7 authorizes the financing of local public works
improvements and the imposition of special assessments upon abutting property owners
upon the adoption of an appropriate ordinance by the Board of Supervisors; and
WHEREAS, the County Administration has negotiated the extension of the public
sewer system to the Orander Drive-Gieser Road community; and
WHEREAS, the extension of the public sewer system and the creation of a special
utility (sewer) service area will alleviate a critical public health and safety problem; and
WHEREAS, several of the residents have requested that the County allow them to
pay their portion of the costs of connection to the public sanitary sewer system over ten
years in accordance with the provisions of Ordinance 112288-7; and
WHEREAS, the first reading of this Ordinance was held on July 14, 1998, and the
second reading was held July 28, 1998.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as
follows:
1. That pursuant to the authority of Ordinance 112288-7, the Board authorizes
and approves a local public works improvement project, namely, public sanitary sewer
extension for a portion of the Orander Drive and Gieser Road community. The total
1
construction cost of this public sewer project is estimated to be $50,000.00, to be initially
financed as follows:
Citizen Participation (8 x $2,571) $20,568
Advance from Public Works Participation Fund $20,568
Utility Department Unappropriated Sewer Fund $ 8,864
That there is hereby appropriated for this project the sum of $20,568 from the Public
Works Participation Fund (which was established by the Board of Supervisors on July 23,
1996). That there is hereby appropriated for this project the sum of $8,864 from the Utility
Department Unappropriated Sewer Fund. Any citizen participation under paragraph 3. will
be advanced as a loan from the Sewer Fund.
2. That the Project Service Area is shown and designated on the attached plat
entitled Orander Drive-Gieser Road Sanitary Sewer Project prepared by the Roanoke
County Utility Department, dated July 28, 1998, and identified as Exhibit 1. The Orander
Drive-Gieser Road Sanitary Sewer Service Area is created for a period of ten years.
(A) On or before September 30, 1998, any owner of real estate within this
service area electing to participate in and benefit from the public sanitary sewer extension
to this service area may do so by paying the sum of $2,571 per connection toward
construction costs plus $750, which represents 50% of the current the off-site facility fee
of $1,500, said costs to be paid in full and in advance of connection to the public sanitary
sewer extension.
(B) After September 30, 1998, any owner of real estate within this service
area electing to participate in and benefit from the public sanitary sewer extension to this
service area may do so by paying the sum of $3,214 per connection toward construction
2
costs plus the off-site facility fee in effect at the time of connection (currently $1,500), said
costs to be paid in full and in advance of connection to the public sanitary sewer extension.
3. That the Board authorizes and approves the payment by the property
owners in the project service area who elect to participate on or before September 30,
1998, of their portion of the cost of extending the public sanitary sewer system to their
properties in accordance with the following terms and conditions:
(a) Payment of $3,321 per property owner/residential connection ($2,571
for constructions costs plus $750 which is 50% of the current off-site facilities fees) to be
financed for a maximum of 10 years at an interest rate of 8% percent per annum. Property
owners agree to pay $1,321 down and financing the remaining $2,000. The down payment
will be applied first to the off-site facility fee and then to the construction costs.
(b) Property owners agree to execute a promissory note or such other
instrument as the County may require to secure this installment debt.
(c) Property owners further agree to execute such lien document or
instrument as may be required by the County; said lien document or instrument to be
recorded in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County. This lien
instrument or document shall secure the repayment of the promissory note by the property
owners to the County and shall be a lien against the property of the owners. Property
owners also agree to pay the County any Clerk's fees or recordation costs which may be
required to record any lien instrument or documents in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit
Court.
3
4. That the payment by citizens in the project service area, in excess of the
eight anticipated with this ordinance, who elect to participate, shall be made to the various
funds as follows: The off-site facility fee shall be returned to the Sewer Fund, and payment
of the construction costs shall be returned to the Public Works Participation Fund until
such time as the advance has been repaid.
5. That the County Administrator is authorized to take such actions and execute
such documents as may be necessary to accomplish the purposes of this transaction, all
upon form approved by the County Attorney.
6. That this Ordinance shall take effect on and from the date of its adoption.
On motion of Supervisor McNamara to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
ZuAt& Q.
Brenda J. HoltoK CMC
Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Gary Robertson, Director, Utility
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance
4
OC)
ry w
O
LLJ ry ao
cn C- rn
LLJ z °'
I O
LLJ (n Oo
] Z N
W
0 X J
r
W r'
C) LLJ
z
<�
O
LLJ
�
U_
O ry
n ,
LL_
I__L
�V
�u
}
/ Av3
U I
(T W J
0 O ry
� S 0Ln 1"7
to
W n
AV 0W N
�tv ; z I
J cn
m Q
O p to
n h�
= W
? Z
td
�s h
n
L)
N
n �� 0
�N m
1
_ C O
�.-
\
Wpp (
Z
O
SO I
11.0
I
�
V,
Ct
41
W
w
M%N
)
w U
_
^
O\
W
Z W C
W
pYn p0O Z O1
W N
°10 O p c
8 n OX v1
or Z � n
J
9Z0£ J
W
2 N
W Z
W OI =�N
'n X30 u
Son Zcri.l T1=N
�• O 1
W n o
IL E N �j
J
O
O 2
al
Mal,
O
O /
= O
U �
3
ANO
•� h ���
SO I
q
O��
x9^
�Ic
)
C'
^
W
Z W C
^O W N
N C
La
h cr
W
=a n
co
jr
W N
c3 t0
J W
n
J H
t0
n
1lb
w
W
V N
• I
W_ O
y��
W
m 0 n
CL
W
pYn p0O Z O1
W N
°10 O p c
8 n OX v1
or Z � n
J
9Z0£ J
W
2 N
W Z
W OI =�N
'n X30 u
Son Zcri.l T1=N
�• O 1
W n o
IL E N �j
J
O
O 2
al
Mal,
O
O /
= O
U �
3
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 28, 1998
ORDINANCE 072898-6 AUTHORIZING THE CREATION OF AND
FINANCING FOR A LOCAL PUBLIC WORKS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT,
SETTER ROAD SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION, HUNTRIDGE
SUBDIVISION, AND ACCEPTING THE DONATION OF UTILITY
EASEMENTS
WHEREAS, Ordinance 112288-7 authorizes the financing of local public works
improvements and the imposition of special assessments upon abutting property owners
upon the adoption of an appropriate ordinance by the Board of Supervisors; and
WHEREAS, the County Administration has negotiated the extension of the public
sewer system to the Setter Road area of the Huntridge Subdivision; and
WHEREAS, the extension of the public sewer system and the creation of a special
utility (sewer) service area will alleviate a critical public health and safety problem; and
WHEREAS, several of the residents have requested that the County allow them to
pay their portion of the costs of connection to the public sanitary sewer system over ten
years in accordance with the provisions of Ordinance 112288-7; and
WHEREAS, the first reading of this Ordinance was held on July 14, 1998, and the
second reading was held July 28, 1998.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as
follows:
1. That pursuant to the authority of Ordinance 112288-7, the Board authorizes
and approves a local public works improvement project, namely, public sanitary sewer
extension for a portion of the Huntridge Subdivision along Setter Road. The total
1
construction cost of this public sewer project is estimated to be $35,000.00, to be initially
financed as follows:
Citizen Participation (2 x $4,000) $ 8,000
Advance from Public Works Participation Fund $ 8,000
Utility Department Unappropriated Sewer Fund $19,000
That there is hereby appropriated for this project the sum of $8,000 from the Public
Works Participation Fund (which was established by the Board of Supervisors on July 23,
1996). That there is hereby appropriated for this project the sum of $19,000 from the
Utility Department Unappropriated Sewer Fund. Any citizen participation under paragraph
3. will be advanced as a loan from the Sewer Fund.
2. That the Project Service Area is shown and designated on the attached plat
entitled Huntridge Subdivision - Setter Drive - Sanitary Sewer Petition prepared by the
Roanoke County Utility Department, dated July 28, 1998, and identified as Exhibit 1. The
Huntridge Subdivision - Setter Drive Sanitary Sewer Service Area is created for a period
of ten years.
(A) On or before September 30, 1998, any owner of real estate within this
service area may participate in and benefit from the public sanitary sewer extension to this
service area by paying the sum of $4,000 toward construction costs plus $750, which
represents 50% of the current off-site facility fee of $1,500, said costs to be paid in full and
in advance of connection to the public sanitary sewer extension.
(B) After September 30, 1998, any owner of real estate within this service
area may participate in and benefit from the public sanitary sewer extension to this service
area by paying the sum of $5,000 toward construction costs plus the off-site facility fee in
2
effect at the time of connection (currently $1,500), said costs to be paid in full and in
advance of connection to the public sanitary sewer extension.
3. That the Board authorizes and approves the payment by the property
owners in the project service area who elect to participate on or before September 30,
1998, of their portion of the cost of extending the public sanitary sewer system to their
properties in accordance with the following terms and conditions:
(a) Payment of $4,750 per property owner/residential connection ($4,000
for construction costs plus $750 which is 50% of the current off-site facility fee) to be
financed for a maximum of 10 years at an interest rate of 8% percent per annum. Property
owners agree to pay $1,750 down and financing the remaining $3,000. The down payment
will be applied first to the off-site facility fee and then to the construction costs.
(b) Property owners agree to execute a promissory note or such other
instrument as the County may require to secure this installment debt.
(c) Property owners further agree to execute such lien document or
instrument as may be required by the County; said lien document or instrument to be
recorded in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County. This lien
instrument or document shall secure the repayment of the promissory note by the property
owners to the County and shall be a lien against the property of the owners. Property
owners also agree to pay the County any Clerk's fees or recordation costs which may be
required to record any lien instrument or documents in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit
Court.
3
4. That the payment by citizens in the project service area, in excess of the two
(2) anticipated with this ordinance, who elect to participate, shall be made to the various
funds as follows: The off-site facility fee shall be returned to the Sewer Fund, and payment
of the construction costs shall be returned to the Public Works Participation Fund until
such time as the advance has been repaid; any further payment of construction costs shall
be returned to the Sewer Fund.
5. That the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts the donation to said Board of
a sewer line easement of variable width from the following property owners along Setter
Road: William D. Hale (Tax Map No. 40.14-1-18); F. Wayne Knowles (Tax Map No. 40.14-
1-19); Paul P. Dicks (Tax Map No. 40.14-1-20); Stephan L. Dunn (Tax Map No. 40.14-1-
21); Benjamin R. Asbury, Jr. (Tax Map No. 40.14-1-22); John F. Zuraw (Tax Map No.
40.14-1-23); David L. Beckner (Tax Map No. 40.14-1-24); Garland E. Calhoun, III (Tax
Map No. 40.14-1-25); E. Robert Purcell (Tax Map No. 40.14-1-26).
6. That the County Administrator is authorized to take such actions and execute
such documents as may be necessary to accomplish the purposes of this transaction, all
upon form approved by the County Attorney.
7. That this Ordinance shall take effect on and from the date of its adoption.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
4
&x4
Q &8�
A.4.
Brenda J. Hol n, CMC
Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Gary Robertson, Director, Utility
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance
a�
-C c
U J
C
7 U
00 3
0
OlU)
:;_->1
cn;t
X
W 0
\0
♦
♦
I
Y
OtNV�
^Yi13/g)
1z�
W
a
` g
♦
Y b
I O
orn
:N0
W
Ory�
`
Y rWF-
W
1 N6
t
yl
1
:Elm
yah
o
O ¢
z
z
iv
1
A
` '+
r
U J
O Y g
`
°
W W
:tog
�—® O
S
fN0
f7
,
,
Y�
z
` �uq
O
G
w
U
w
k�
fi'--,�,
Z
cz
D=4
D=4 uj 03
0�aw
ccLU CO
N
0-4 1-.-
N
Ym
W
10
N Q ,
V Y W
0
M
LU 02
p a. w
W O co
F..
LU N
IL 0
IL
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 28, 1998
RESOLUTION 072898-7 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN
ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA
FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM J CONSENT AGENDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as
follows:
1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for July 28,
1998 designated as Item J - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred
in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 9,
inclusive, as follows:
1. Approval of Minutes for June 23, 1998, June 26, 1998 (Joint Meeting with
School Board, and July 14, 1998 (Joint Meeting with Roanoke City Council).
2. Request from Schools for acceptance and appropriation of $65,000 grant to
the Tech Prep Consortium fund.
3. Request from Schools for acceptance and appropriation of $2,800 grant from
the Virginia Commission for the Arts.
4. Request from Sheriffs Office to accept the Adult Literacy and Basic
Education Program grant for $15,288.89 and appropriate funds.
5. Approval of resolution rescinding and repealing certain policies previously
adopted by the Board of Supervisors within the Fire and Rescue
Department, and to provide for a policy manual.
6. Acceptance of water facilities serving Roselawn Court.
7. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Waterford, Section
6.
8. Donation of a drainage easement on property of FW Property, L.L.C. to
serve Future Section 1, "Fort Lewis Cove", Catawba Magisterial District.
9. Submission of subscriber complaints regarding Cable Programming Services
(C.P.S.) tier rates of Cox Communications Roanoke (formerly Cox Cable
Roanoke) to the Federal Communications Commission.
2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by
law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item
pursuant to this resolution.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Consent Resolution, and carried by
the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Brenda J. Holto , CMC
Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Garland Kidd, Director, Vocational and Adult Education
Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance
Dr. Deanna Gordon, School Superintendent
Brenda Chastain, Clerk, School Board
Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff
Gary Robertson, Director, Utility
Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
Vickie L. Huffman, Assistant County Attorney
Joseph B. Obenshain, Senior Assistant County Attorney
2
ACTION # A -072898-7.a
ITEM NUMBER
MEETING DATE: July 28, 1998
AGENDA ITEM: Tech Prep Grant Appropriation
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND: The Roanoke Area Tech Prep Consortium was established in
1992 and consists of Virginia Western Community college and seven school
divisions surrounding the college. Roanoke County has been the fiscal
agent for the state administered Carl Perkins federal funds which the
consortium has received annually since 1992. Each year the money has been
appropriated for the grant amount and reimbursed quarterly to the county by
the state.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The grants total $65,000 for fiscal year 1998-99
and will continue the Tech Prep Consortium activities including a part-time
director's salary, secretarial pay, staff development activities, student
recruitment, curriculum development, articulation, work place experiences
for students and teachers, classroom materials and supplies and program
evaluation.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Appropriation of the $65,000 grants to the Tech Prep
Consortium fund.
K,
Garland Kidd Elmer C. Hodge
Director of Vocational and County Administrator
Adult Education
ACTION VOTE
No Yes
Approved (X) Motion by:Bob L. Johnson to approve Johnson _ x
Denied ( ) Harrison _ x
Received ( ) McNamara_ x
Referred ( ) Minnix _ x
To ( ) Nickens _ x
cc: File
Garland Kidd, Director, Vocational and Adult Education
Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance
Dr. Deanna Gordon, School Superintendent
Brenda Chastain, Clerk, School Board
Abs
ACTION A 072898-7. b
ITEM NUMBER
MEETING DATE: July 28, 1998
AGENDA ITEM: Virginia Commission of the Arts Grant Appropriation
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND: The Virginia Commission for the Arts approved a grant in the
amount of $2,800 for Roanoke County Schools to apply towards eight
performances by Virginia Opera for all of the division's elementary
schools.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: A check in the amount of $2,380 was sent to
Roanoke County Schools on April 15 and as per the contract with VCU, the
balance of $420 will be sent upon receipt of the final report (submitted
6/4/98) .
FISCAL IMPACT: None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Appropriation of the $2,380 and, when received, the
$42/0o the grant fund.
Garland Life E mer C. Hodg
Senior Director of Instruction County Administrator
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
No Yes Abs
Approved (x) Motion by:Bob L. Johnson to approve Johnson _ x
Denied ( ) Harrison _ x
Received ( ) McNamara_ x
Referred ( ) Minnix _ x
To ( ) Nickens _ x
cc: File
Garland Kidd, Director, Vocational and Adult Education
Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance
Dr. Deanna Gordon, School Superintendent
Brenda Chastain, Clerk, School Board
A-072898-7 . c
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. Z
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
AGENDA ITEM: Request to accept the Adult Literacy and Basic Education Program
Grant and to appropriate the funds into the Sheriff's Office Care and Confinement of
Prisoners Part -Time Salaries Account.
BACKGROUND: We have received approval for the grant money from the
State Department of Education for the Adult Literacy and Basic
Education/GED program operated by Roanoke City Schools under the
auspices of the Roanoke County/Salem Jail. The funding period
begins July 1, 1998 and will end June 30, 1999. The total amount
of the grant is in the amount of $15,288.89. We will be reimbursed
with Federal funds in the amount of $13,760.00 and we are to cover
the remaining amount of $1,528.89 from Jail funds. The jail's match
is being paid out of the Sheriff's Office Subfund account and
requires no additional funding from the Board of Supervisors.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: See attachment.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ALTERNATIVES: None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of this grant per
the conditions of the Roanoke City Public Schools and the Roanoke
County Sheriff's Office.
Respectfully submitted,
Gerald S. Holt
Sheriff
Appro d by,
7z
Elmer C. Hodge, Jr.
County Administrator
�I
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
No Yes Abs
Approved (X) Motion by:Bob L. Johnson to approve Johnson _ x
Denied () Harrison _ x _
Received () McNamara_ x
Referred () Minnix _ x _
To () Nickens _ x
cc: File
Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff
Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance
it#
Roanoke
City Public Schools
Division of Instruction • Deportment of Adult Education
The Jefferson Center, 541 Luck Ave., S.W., Suite 330, Roanoke, Virginia 24016
May 4, 1998
Sheriff Gerald Holt
County of Roanoke, City of Salem Jail
401 East Main Street
Salem, Virginia 24153
Dear Sheriff Holt:
The State Department of Education has approved $13,760.00 for the Adult Basic
Education/GED program in the Roanoke County -City of Salem Jail for the period
beginning July 1, 1998 and ending June 30, 1999. This is contingent upon the receipt of
federal funds by the Virginia Department of Education. The amount of $13,760.00 will
need to be matched with $1,528.89. The cash match can come from funds which you
use to purchase supplies and materials or pay salaries and/or fixed benefits to employees
in the GED instructional program.
We will be contacting you periodically to secure numbers of hours which
individuals have worked so that we can claim reimbursement for this program from the
State. We will forward funds to your office upon receipt.
We will also look forward to working with your instructional staff in professional
development in-service programs for teachers during the school year. Please let me
know if I can assist you in other ways during the coming school year.
Sincerely,
xfv� 44v��
Dorothy W. Hayes
Supervisor
Adult and Continuing Education
cc: Lloyd W. Enoch
Director of Business, Technical, and Adult Education
Excellence in Education
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 28, 1998
RESOLUTION 072898-7.d RESCINDING AND REPEALING CERTAIN
POLICIES PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
WITHIN THE FIRE AND RESCUE DEPARTMENT, AND TO PROVIDE FOR
A POLICY MANUAL TO GUIDE THE ADMINISTRATION OF COUNTY
GOVERNMENT
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County hereby establishes a
Policy Manual to provide an organized, systematic approach to the handling of routine
matters by this government organization, and a dependable source of reference for all
County departments and the Board; and,
WHEREAS, this Policy Manual is based upon actions taken and measures adopted
by the various boards of supervisors of Roanoke County over the past 20 years; and,
WHEREAS, in reviewing these actions of the boards of supervisors of Roanoke
County over the past 20 years, certain actions should be repealed, rescinded, modified or
amended; and,
WHEREAS, this Resolution addresses those actions pertaining to the Fire and
Rescue Department.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That there is hereby established a Policy Manual for Roanoke County
government.
2. That Resolution 92788-2 adopted on September 27, 1988 which adopted an
emergency operation plan is hereby rescinded.
1
2. That Resolution 1240 adopted on May 13, 1975 providing for the
appointment of a Fire Marshal and Assistant Fire Marshal is hereby repealed. That
Resolution 82890-6 adopted on August 28, 1990 concerning the appointment of a Fire
Marshal is hereby revised to be consistent with the provisions of current State law as
provided in Chapter 3 "Local Fire Marshals" and Chapter 9 "Statewide Fire Prevention
Code Act" of Title 27 "Fire Protection" of the Code of Virginia; and Chapter 9 "Fire
Prevention and Protection" of the Roanoke County Code.
4. That Resolution 1415 adopted on January 13, 1976, and Resolution 3195
adopted on July 27, 1982 providing for Workers Compensation benefits for volunteer fire
and rescue personnel are hereby repealed. The provisions of these resolutions are
currently incorporated in Article 4 "Self -Insurance Program" of Chapter 2 "Administration"
of the Roanoke County Code.
5. That this Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
0. AU4��
Brenda J. Hol n, CMC
Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Richard E. Burch, Chief, Fire & Rescue
Paul M .Mahoney, County Attorney
Mary E. Hicks, Executive Secretary
2
AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 27, 1988
R E S O L U T I O N 9 2 7 8 8- 2
AUTHORIZING ADOPTION OF
EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN FOR
ROANOKE COUNTY
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors is
greatly concerned with the health, safety, and well-being of its
citizens and desires that the best possible emergency services be
available to them; and
WHEREAS, the Commonwealth of Virginia Emergency
Services and Disaster Law of 1973 requires that each city and
county develop and maintain an Emergency Operations Plan which
addresses its planned response to emergency situations; and
WHEREAS, such a plan has been developed by County staff
in coordination with the Virginia Department of Emergency
Services with input from responsible local agencies.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Roanoke County
Board of Supervisors that, on the 27th day of September, 1988, it
does hereby officially adopt the Roanoke County Emergency
Operations Plan, to include plans and procedures for both
peacetime and war -caused disasters.
On motion of Supervisor McGraw, seconded by Supervisor
Robers and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McGraw, Nickens, Robers, Garrett
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTS:
Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Thomas C. Fuqua, Chief of Fire & Rescue Department
PLT lfq(J UL• THE ROANGXE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS , HELD
3.`''CHE SALEM-ROANO:;y VALLEY CIVIC CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 13, 1975.
RESOLUTION NO.* 1240 DESIGNATING A FIRE MARSHAL
AND AN ASSISTANT FIRE MARSHAL FOR ROANOKE COUNTY.
WHEREAS, Section 27-30 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended,
provides that the Board of Supervisors may, at such time as it deems
the same to be expedient, appoint an individual to be Fire Marshal
for the County; and
WHEREAS, Section 27-36 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended,
provides that the Board of Supervisors may, at .such time as it deems
the same to be expedient, appoint an'individual to be Assistant Fire
Marshal for the County;and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors is of opinion that the Fire
Coordinator of Roanoke County should be designated and appointed as'
the Fire Marshal of Roanoke County and that the Fire Inspector of
Roanoke County should be designated and appointed as Assistant Fire
Marshal in order that said individuals may enforce the fire prevention
and fire safety laws of Roanoke County.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County that the Fire Coordinator be, and he is hereby officially
designated and appointed the Fire Marshal for Roanoke County..
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Fire Inspector be, and he is
hereby officially designated and appointed the Assistant Fire
Marshal for Roanoke County.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said individuals shall, before exercising
any authority granted to them as.Fire Marshal or Assistant Fire Marshal, .
satisfactorily complete a policy training course designed specifically
for local fire marshals and assistants, which course shall be approved
by the Law -Enforcement Officers Training Standards Commission, as said
requirement is contained in Section 27-34.2 of the. Code of Virginia.
BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that prior to acting in any official
capacity, the Fire Marshal and his- Assistant shall take the oath
--required by Section 27-37 of the Code of Virginia.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson and adopted by the following
.recorded vote:
AYES: Mr. Dodson, Mrs. Johnson, Mr. Seibel,
Mr. Flora
NAYS: None A Copy. - Teste:
ABSENT: Mr. Hilton --1
William F. Clark, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON .TUESDAY, AUGUST 28, 1990
RESOLUTION 82890-6 APPOINTING THE FIRE MARSHALL
FOR ROANOKE COUNTY AND AUTHORIZING EXERCISE OF
POWERS UNDER CHAPTER 3 OF TITLE 27 OF THE CODE
OF VIRGINIA AND THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE
WHEREAS, Chapter 3 of Title 27 of the Code of Virginia, 1950,
as amended, provides statutory authority to the governing bodies
of counties, cities and towns to appoint a fire marshall and
provides for the duties and powers of such official; and
WHEREAS, the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code,
previously enacted as Chapter 9 of the Roanoke County Code by
Ordinance 52488-13, sets forth the duties and powers of the Roanoke
County Fire Marshall in enforcing these codes; and
WHEREAS, it is the intent of this resolution to confer upon
the Chief of the Fire and Rescue Department of Roanoke County the
authority as fire marshall and to designate officers of that
department to exercise the duties and powers of the position at his
direction.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia as follows:
1. The Chief of the Fire and Rescue Department is hereby
appointed as Roanoke County Fire Marshall which position and title
shall include the term "fire official" or "arson investigator".
The Fire Marshall shall be responsible for exercising all duties
and powers of that position or that of the Fire Official granted
or implied under Virginia law, including the Virginia Statewide
Fire Prevention Code.
2. The Chief of the Fire and Rescue Department is hereby
MW
granted the authority to designate an officer of his department to
perform the duties and exercise the powers of the Fire Marshall.
Such authorization may include the authority to issue such summons
as authorized by law and the responsibility to respond to all
subpoenas and summonses directed to the Fire Marshall or Fire
official for Roanoke County.'
3. The Chief of the Fire and Rescue Department is further
authorized to appoint one or more assistants, who shall have the
powers and perform the duties of the Fire Marshall as provided by
§ 27-36 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. Such designated
Fire Marshall and assistants shall have received the necessary
training to exercise the powers granted by § 27-34.2 and § 27-
34.2:1 of the Code of Virginia.
4. The officer designated by the Chief of the Fire and
Rescue Department to act as Roanoke County Fire Marshall shall be
responsible for the management of the Fire Prevention Division and
for the enforcement of the County Fire Prevention Code , other
ordinances concerning fire prevention and any other fire prevention
related activity. Specifically, such designated Fire Marshall and
his assistants are authorized to exercise all powers granted by §
27-34.2 and § 27-34.2:1 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended.
The designated Fire Marshall and his assistants are further
authorized to exercise the powers conferred by § 27-81(b) of the
Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, in the same manner and subject
to the same conditions as other authorities.
5. That this resolution shall be in force from the date of
its passage.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt resolution, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Eddy, McGraw, Johnson, Nickens, Robers
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. -Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Thomas C. Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue
D. Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney
Magistrate
Police Department
Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke, 24016
Main Library
Roanoke County Code Book
Roanoke County Family Services Court, Intake Counsellor
AT A R_FGULAR MEETINGfOF THE BOARD OF COUNTY SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
HELD AT THE SALEM-ROANOKE VALLEY CIVIC CENTER ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 13, 1976.
RESOLUTION NO. 1415 GRANTING WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION
INSURANCE BE?1EFITS TO THE COUNTY VOLUNTEER FIREMEN AND
RESCUE SQUAD MEMBERS.
WHEREAS, the County has many dedicated volunteer firemen and
rescue squad members who on many occasions risk their lives in per-
forming the duties connected with membership in said organizations; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Supervisors is of opinion that members
of said organizations should be included within the County workmen's
compensation insurance program.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Supervisors
of Roanoke County that said Board hereby extends workmen's compensation
insurance benefits to the hereinafter specified volunteer firemen and
rescue squad members of all County volunteer fire companies and rescue
squads.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that only suchqualified members as are
listed on membership rosters maintained in the office of the County
Executive shall be eligible for such workmen's compensation benefits.
On motion of Supervisor Tompkins and adopted by the following
recorded vote:
AYES: Mr. Compton, Mr. Myers, Mr. Tompkins, Mrs. Johnson
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Mr. Dodson
A Copy - Teste:
William F. Clark, Clerk
Board of County Supervisors
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE aOARO OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA,
HELD AT THE SALEM-ROANOKE COUNTY CIVIC CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 27, 1982.
RESOLUTION NO. 3195 DESIGNATING THE ROANOKE COUNTY
VOLUNTEER FIREMEN, THE ROANOKE COUNTY RESCUE SQUADSMEN,
AND THE ROANOKE COUNTY AUXILIARY POLICEMAN EMPLOYEES OF
ROANOKE COUNTY FOR PURPOSES OF WORKMEN'S COMPASATION
BE IT, RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia,
as follows:
1. That the Roanoke County volunteer firemen, Roanoke County rescue
squadsmen, and Roanoke County auxiliary policemen be, and they herehy are,
declared to be employees of Roanoke County for the sole and exclusive purpose
of inclusion in the Commonwealth of Virginia's assigned risk program for
workmen's compensation pursuant to Section 65.1-4.1 of the 1950 Code of
Virginia, as amended; and
2. That an attested copy of this resolution he forthwith forwarded
to the Travelers Indemnity Company of Hartford,, Connecticut, and to the
Department of Workmen's Compensation of the Commonwealth of Virginia.
On motion of Supervisor Gary James Minter and adopted by the following,
roll call vote:
AYES: Supervisors Minter, Johnson, Myers, and Burton.
NAYS: None.
A Copy - Teste:
Donald R.iFt rs, Cle m
Board of Supervisors
3-9-02 copies to:
Insurance Clerk
Director of Finance
Fire and Emergency Services Coordinator
County Sheriff
file
Personnel/Payrolls
A -072898-7.e
ACTION #
ITEM NUMBER
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: July 28, 1998
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Water Facilities Serving Roselawn Court
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Developers of Roselawn Court, MRW Developers, LLC, have requested that Roanoke County
accept the Deed conveying the water facilities serving the subdivision along with all necessary
easements.
The water facilities are installed, as shown on plans prepared by Lumsden Associates entitled
Roselawn Court, which are on file in the County Engineering Department. The water facility
construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The value of the water construction is $34,000.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the water facilities serving the Roselawn
Court subdivision along with all necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to
execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities.
SUBMITTED BY:
A
Gary Robertso , P.E.
Utility Director
Approved (X)
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred ( )
To ( )
--Zil
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
ACTION
Motion by:Bob L Johnson to approve
cc: File
Gary Robertson, Director, Utility
Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
VOTE
No Yes Abs
Johnson — x
Harrison _ x
McNamara_ x
Minnix — x
Nickens _ x
R OANOKE COUNTY
UTILITY
DEPARTMENT
ACCEPTANCE OF WATER FACILITIES SERVING
ROSELAWN COURT.
`76 v3
RETURN To:
ROANOKE COUNTY
ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
THIS CHATTEL DEED, made this 9th day of April , 19 98 , by and between:
MRW Developers. LLC , a Virginia corporation, hereinafter referred to as the "Developer,"
party of the first part; and the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COI.JNTY, VIRGINIA,
its successors or assigns, hereinafter referred to as the "Board," parry of the second part.
:WITNESSETH:
THAT FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual benefits accruing to the parties, the
receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Developer does hereby GRANT,
CONVEY, ASSIGN AND TRANSFER, with the covenants of GENERAL WARRANTY OF
TITLE, in fee simple unto the Board all water and/or sewer lines, valves, fittings, laterals,
connections, storage facilities, sources of water supply, pumps, manholes and any and all other
equipment and appurtenances thereunto belonging, in and to the water and/or sewer systems in the
streets, avenues, public utility, easement areas, water and sewer easement areas that have been or
may hereafter be installed by the Developer, along with the right to perpetually use and occupy the
easements in which the same may be located, all of which is more particularly shown, described and
designated as follows, to wit:
Page 1 of 4
As shown on the plan entitled Roselawn Court , made by Lumsden Associates.
PC and on file in the Roanoke County Engineering Department.
The Developer does hereby covenant and warrant that it will be responsible for the proper
installation and construction of the said water and/or sewer systems including repair of surface areas
affected by settlement of utility trenches for a period of one (1) year after date of acceptance by the
Board and will perform any necessary repairs at its cost.
Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby joins in the
execution of this instrument to signify the acceptance of this conveyance pursuant to Resolution No.
adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, on the
day of '19
Page 2 of 4
Developer:
By:
As:
WITNESS THE FOLLOWING signatures and seals:
MRW Developers LLC
State of. Virginia
County/City of: Roanoke , to wit:
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this:
day of h — — 19
By: Mark S. Webb Its Manager
Duly authorized officer Title
on behalf of MRW Developers, LLC
Not Public
My Commission expires:9;
C
Page 3 of 4
Approved as to form:
County Attorney
Board of Supervisors of j7—
Roanoke County, Virginia
By: (SEAL)
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
State of: Virginia
County/City of: Roanoke , to wit:
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this:
, day of , 19
by Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator, on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia.
Notary Public
My Commission expires:
Page 4 of 4
ACTION # A-072898-7. f
ITEM NUMBER � l
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: July 28, 1998
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Waterford,
Section 6
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
I UZ
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Developers of Waterford, Section 6, Strauss Construction Corporation, have requested that
Roanoke County accept the Deed conveying the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the
subdivision along with all necessary easements.
The water and sewer facilities are installed, as shown on plans prepared by Lumsden Associates
entitled Waterford, Section 6, which are on file in the County Engineering Department. The water
and sanitary sewer facility construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by the
County.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The value of the water and sanitary sewer construction is $31,000 and $24,000 respectively.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving
the Waterford, Section 6 subdivision along with all necessary easements, and authorize the County
Administrator to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities.
SUBMITTED BY:
l �
Gary Roberton, P.E.
Utility Director
APPROVED:
If �11"
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
No Yes Abs
Approved (X) Motion by:Bob L. Johnson to approve Johnson _ x _
Denied O Harrison _ x
Received () McNamara_ x
Referred () Minnix _ x
To () Nickens _ x
cc: File
Gary Robertson, Director, Utility
Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
NORTH
mlmmm�
--,F__ * / ,
p
ROANOKE COUNTY
UTILITY
DEPARTMENT
ACCEPTANCE OF WATER AND SEWER FACILITIES
SERVING WATERFORD, SECTION 6.
v —7-7=21,f—,
7: r"
---------- -- --
777
MIC .'F4 ON' "I
01-m mcww
rim% w
_ - - - - - - - - - - — - - - - - -
all, NNIW .0 ol—.
--g'CARLE-T
A
I zzzz
t. mir
In '*;'We wtv" SCARLET OAK ORWE
" I' - - - - - - - - - - - I
-
- - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - — - - - . . . . . . . . . . . .
ow w 41111
p
ROANOKE COUNTY
UTILITY
DEPARTMENT
ACCEPTANCE OF WATER AND SEWER FACILITIES
SERVING WATERFORD, SECTION 6.
THIS CHATTEL DEED, made this 22 day of June , 19 98 , by and between:
Strauss Construction Corporation. , a Virginia corporation, hereinafter referred to as the
"Developer," party of the first part; and the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, its successors or assigns, hereinafter referred to as the "Board," party of the
second part.
:WITNESSETH:
THAT FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual benefits accruing to the parties, the
receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Developer does hereby GRANT,
CONVEY, ASSIGN AND TRANSFER, with the covenants of GENERAL WARRANTY OF
TITLE, in fee simple unto the Board all water and/or sewer lines, valves, fittings, laterals,
connections, storage facilities, sources of water supply, pumps, manholes and any and all other
equipment and appurtenances thereunto belonging, in and to the water and/or sewer systems in the
streets, avenues, public utility, easement areas, water and sewer easement areas that have been or
may hereafter be installed by the Developer, along with the right to perpetually use and occupy the
easements in which the same may be located, all of which is more particularly shown, described and
designated as follows, to wit: .
Page 1 of 4
As shown on the plan entitled Waterford. Section 6 , made by
Lumsden Associates and on file in the Roanoke County Engineering Department.
The Developer does hereby covenant and warrant that it will be responsible for the proper
installation and construction of the said water and/or sewer systems including repair of surface areas
affected by settlement of utility trenches for a period of one (1) year after date of acceptance by the
Board and will perform any necessary repairs at its cost.
Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby joins in the
execution of this instrument to signify the acceptance of this conveyance pursuant to Resolution No.
adopted by the Board of Supervisors. of Roanoke County, Virginia, on the
day of —'19
Page 2 of 4
Developer:
IN
�i
WITNESS THE FOLLOWING signatures and seals:
As: President
State of. Virginia
County/City of: Roanoke _,to wit:
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this:
day of Q, 19
By: Steven S. Strauss its President
Duly authorized officer Title
on behalf of Strauss Construction Corporation
Notary Public '
My Commission expires:P�
Page 3 of 4
Approved as to form: Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia
By: (SEAL)
County Attorney Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
State of: Virginia
County/City o£ Roanoke , to wit:
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this:
, day of , 19 ,
by Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator, on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia.
Notary Public
My Commission expires:
Page 4 of 4
A-072898-7.9
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. NJ�"
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: July 28, 1998
AGENDA ITEM: Donation of a drainage easement on property of FW Properties, L.L.C. to the
Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County to serve Future Section 91, "Fort
Lewis Cove" (Catawba Magisterial District)
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
This consent agenda item involves acceptance of the following easement conveyed to the
Board of Supervisors for drainage purposes, in connection with development of Future Section #1,
"Fort Lewis Cove," in the Catawba Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke:
a) Donation of a drainage easement, seventy feet (70') in width, from FW Properties,
L.L.C., (Deed Book 1564, page 1154) (Tax Map No. 44.03-4-37) as shown on a plat
prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C., dated June 16, 1998, a copy of which is
attached hereto.
The location and dimensions of this property have been reviewed and approved by the
County's engineering stall.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends acceptance of the drainage easement.
Respectfully submitted,
Vickie L. Huffman
Assistant County Attorney
ACTION VOTE
No Yes Abs
Approved (X) Motion by: Bob L Johnson to approve Johnson _ x
Denied () Harrison — x _
Received () McNamara_ x —
Referred () Minnix — x _
To () Nickens — x
cc: File
Vickie L. Huffman, Assistant County Attorney
Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development
FUTUp6E SEGt/ON #1
"F02T GEW/s GOVE"
4EGTA = 2'06'40'
PAD= 542.95'
ARC = 10011
6N012D70 D0,
N 18°!1'18"W
z'
A�7�
TAX*44.03 - 4
AG.
0
FW I°ROPERTfES� L.G.G=
01011564 P6, 1154 m 516'05'57 "E, 20.00
m
n
A
m N6 -W 70'Q2A1NAgC- 3
EASEM&N%'
$ � 215.12
I p3,.W,414�ap�
m � 51� or
1 ��LyyR
NOTES:
1) THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A CURRENT TITLE REPORT AND THERE MAY
EXIST EASEMENTS NOT SHOWN HEREON.
2) THE INTENT OF THIS PLAT -IS TO GRANT THE NEW DRAINAGE EASEMENT TO THE EXISTING
NATURAL WATERCOURSE.
6 //<v/f8
VINCENT k
t 1428B
9
.`� o -----.40V
PLAT SHOWING
NEW 20' DRAINAGE EASEMENT
BEING GRANTED TO
COUNTY OF ROANOKE
FOR PUBLIC USE
BY
FW PROPERTIES, L.L.C.
SITUATED ALONG ALLEGHANY DR. -
CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
SCALE: I"= 100' DATE: 16 JUNE 1998
LUMSDEN ASSOCIATES, P. C.
ENGINEERS -SURVEYORS -PLANNERS
ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
pm-
A -072898-7.h
ACTION #
ITEM NUMBER •
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER
MEETING DATE: July 28, 1998
AGENDA ITEM: Submission of subscriber complaints regarding Cable Programming Services
(C.P.S.) tier rates of Cox Communications Roanoke (formerly Cox Cable
Roanoke) to the F.C.C.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
a � � � fflig WE 211
BACKGROUND:
Recent changes in Federal Communications Commission (F.C.C.) regulations have removed
the ability of individual cable consumers to file complaints which raise objections to rate increases for
the cable programming services tier (C.P.S.) directly with the F.C.C. Cox Communications Roanoke
has announced increases in their rates for cable customers for both basic cable service and for the
C.P.S. tier of cable services effective March 1, 1998. A cable customer has 90 days from the effective
date of an increase in cable rates to file a complaint regarding C.P.S. rates with the franchising
authority. The franchising authority must receive complaints from at least two customers before it
may file a request with the F.C.C. to review an increase in C.P.S. rates. The County has received an
opinion from its outside legal counsel for cable television issues that these rate increases instituted
by Cox Communications are within the range permitted by F.C.C. regulations. (See Attachment "A",
letter from Brian T. Grogan, dated January 15, 1998.)
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Roanoke County has received complaints or protests from twelve citizens requesting a review
of the announced intentions of Cox Communications to increase the rates for its C.P.S. tier effective
March 1, 1998. The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, as the franchising authority, made
an initial determination at its May 12, 1998, meeting that these subscriber complaints were received
within 90 days from the date the rate increase at issue went into effect and that such rate increase
pertains to the C.P. S. tier. Roanoke County then sent a written notice, including a draft FCC Form
329, to Cox Communications to inform them that these complaints are pending with the County.
Cox Communications has submitted a response to the County following this Board's action
on May 12, 1998, to provide notice to Cox of the number of subscriber complaints received and the
County's option to file a Form 329 with the F.C.C. Cox Communication has submitted an amended
form FCC 1240 which justifies their rate increases as within the range permitted by the F.C.C. as
reasonable. (See Attachment "B", letter from John W. Bingham, CPA, Business Manager, dated June
25, 1998.) Roanoke County has 180 days from the effective date of the rate increase in question to
file the FCC Form 329, along with any response from the cable operator, with the F.C.C. I have
received notification that the City of Roanoke is in the process of filing a FCC Form 329 with the
F.C.C. as to this same rate increase. The Town of Vinton filed their FCC Form 329 on May 26,
1998.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
ALTERNATIVES:
Authorize the County Administrator to execute a Form 329, as prepared by the
County Attorney and forward to the Federal Communications Commission (F.C.C.)
prior to August 27, 1998.
2. Decline to file a rate complaint on the C.P.S. tier, Form 329, with the F.C.C. and rely
upon the review of rate increases previously conducted on behalf of the County by
outside legal counsel.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Alternative #l.
Approved (X)
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred ( )
To ( )
cc: File
Respectfully submitted,
Assistant County Attorney
ACTION
Motion by: Bob L. Johnson to approve
VOTE
No Yes Abs
Johnson _ x _
Harrison — x _
McNamara_ x
Minnix _ x _
Nickens x
Joseph B. Obenshain, Senior Assistant County Attorney
Attachment "A"
LAW OFFICES
MOSS & BARNETT
A PROFEssIONAL ASSOCIATION
4800 NORWEST CENTER
90 SOUTH SEVENTH STREET
BRIAN T. GROGAN MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402-4129
(612)347-0340 TELEPHONE (612) 347-0300
E-MAIL: GroganBQmoss-bamett.com FACSIMILE (612) 339-6686
January 15, 1998
VIA FACSIMILE AND U.S. MAIL
Mr. Gary Tegenkamp
Assistant City Attorney
464 Municipal Building
215 Church Avenue SW
Roanoke, VA 24011-1595
VIA FACSIMILE AND U.S. MAIL
Mr. Joseph B. Obenshain
Senior Assistant County Attorney
County of Roanoke
P.O. Box 28800
Roanoke, VA 24018-0798
VIA FACSIMILE AND U.S. MAIL
Mr. William Heartwell, III
Town Attorney
P.O. Box 338
Vinton, VA 24179
Re: Cox Cable's FCC Forms 1240 and 1205
Dear Gentlemen:
U
JAN 20 tScS3
I received from each of you relevant rate regulation materials submitted by Cox Cable.
One issue which has been raised by the City of Roanoke, is the actual legal name of Cox Cable in
the Roanoke Valley area. Mr. Tegenkamp has noted that approximately one year ago Cox
Communication,Roanoke, Inc. merged into CoxCom, Inc. CoxCom, Inc. was to be the grantee
for the cable system in the three jurisdictions and would be doing business as Cox
Communications Roanoke. I am uncertain why Cox Communications Roanoke, Inc. is the legalBq�
.. lr
Suice
1896
Porn e y'3 ��~3
MOSS & BARNETT
A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION '51
Gary Tegenkamp, Joseph B. Obenshain, William Heartwell, III
January 15, 1998
Page 2
name identified on each of your FCC Form 1240's. I believe this issue should be raised with
Cox Cable to clarify the exact name of the grantee and to ensure that all forms are properly
identified. I do not, however, believe that this issue will have any bearing on the rate
submissions by Cox Cable.
• 1 hi7
Before I attempt to explain the impact of Cox Cable's most recent Form 1240 filings on
each of your communities, it may be helpful to briefly review Federal rate regulations.
Franchising authorities such as the city, county and town, may only regulate the rates for the
basic service tier and associated equipment. Franchising authorities are not allowed to regulate
rates for the Cable Programming Services Tier (CPST), nor for any premium or pay-per-view
channels. Only the FCC may regulate CPST rates, and then only in response to an FCC Form
329 (Complaint form) submitted by the franchising authority in that jurisdiction. Rates for
premium channels such as HBO and Cinemax and pay-per-view programming are free from rate
regulation.
When regulating basic service tier rates, cable operators submit rate regulation forms to
Franchising authorities for their review. The Form 1240s each community received are intended
to update rates on an annual basis by reflecting changes in the number of channels, cost of
programming, copyright fees, inflation and other factors. Each form 1240 submitted relies on
data from past filings, so any error in last year's form will impact subsequent filings. Since each
community is considered separate and distinct, each has a separate set of forms establishing rates.
Factors such as population and income level can effect the ultimate maximum permitted rate
identified in each form 1240.
Moreover, each community receives form 1205 to establish equipment rates. FCC
regulations allow operators to average costs over entire regions for equipment rates which is why
each of your communities received identical form 1205s each of which identify the same
equipment rates.
Based on the forms presently available to me, both the city and county have previously
submitted FCC Form 329 to the FCC seeking review of Cox Cable's CPST rates. No Form 329
has been submitted by the town of Vinton and therefore no FCC review was conducted. It is
important to note that despite the fact that all three (3) of your systems are served off the same
head -end and are essentially run as one system by Cox Cable, each of your jurisdictions is
considered separate for purposes of rate regulation and each has an "individual community unit"
MOSS & BARNETT
A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
Gary Tegenkamp, Joseph B. Obenshain, William Heartwell, III
January 15, 1998
Page 3
identifier (CUID) number assigned to it by the FCC. Therefore, despite the fact that certain
errors were discovered by the FCC in reviewing Cox Cable's proposed rates in the city and
county, Cox Cable is not legally required to make similar modifications in the town of Vinton,
since no FCC order was issued for that CUID number.
In the City of Roanoke, the FCC originally adopted an Order on October 14, 1997,
regarding the CPST rates. On November 11, 1997, the FCC adopted an Order on
Reconsideration for the City of Roanoke which essentially determined that Cox Cable had made
errors in its true -up calculations and inflation adjustments, but that the ultimate impact on CPST
rates was only 10 per month per subscriber. Therefore, no refund liability was ordered by the
FCC because the amount in question was deemed "de minimis." Cox Cable reflected the issues
identified by the FCC Orders in its FCC Form 1240 filing submitted to the City of Roanoke on
or about November 27, 1997.
An FCC order was also adopted with respect to the County of Roanoke on November 21,
1997, identifying true -up and inflation errors made by Cox Cable resulting in potential refund
liability of $ .27 per subscriber. The liability is potentially larger in the county because the FCC
went back one extra year due to a complaint form having been filed in the county back in 1996.
Cox Cable has submitted a Petition for Reconsideration to the FCC with respect to the November
27, 1997 Order, although no action has yet been taken in that matter.
IMPACT ON BASIC SERVICE RATES
FCC Form 1240 is set up so that changes in inflation or true -up calculations affect not
only the CPST rate but also the basic service tier rate. In other words, any modification will
affect both rate calculations and will carry through to ultimately determine the maximum
permitted rate for each service level. Theref6re, findings of the FCC with respect to the CPST
rate will have a corresponding impact on the basic service tier rates. In the rate filing for Cox
Cable in the City of Roanoke, the issues in question do not result in any modification of the
maximum permitted basic service tier rate. However, in the County of Roanoke, it is possible
that if the FCC Order is upheld, a corresponding reduction in the basic service tier rates and
applicable refund liability may be ordered by the county.
FCC regulations allow a franchising authority to go back one year from the date of 1240
filing for purposes of establishing refund liability. So the "clock is running" for the county
regarding this matter. I have spoken with Cox Cable representatives about an agreement which
would essentially preserve all of the county's rights to order a refund back in time with respect to
the basic service tier rates pending the outcome of Cox Cable's Petition on Reconsideration to
the FCC. In this way the County will not be forced to immediately issue a rate order on the basic
MOSS & BARNETT
A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
Gary Tegenkamp, Joseph B
January 15, 1998
Page 4
Obenshain, William Heartwell, III
service tier rates before knowing the FCC's decision on Cox Cable's petition. The advantage to
this scenario is that the county is not forced to immediately issue a rate order which might
ultimately be rendered moot if the FCC does in fact alter its Order in light of Cox Cable's
Petition. By entering into an agreement with Cox Cable that the time period for refund liability
will not be affected, the County will have the advantage of waiting to review the FCC's ultimate
decision on this matter and then acting accordingly to ensure subscribers receive the benefit of
any applicable refunds which may be due.
Since the town of Vinton never submitted an FCC Form 329 to the FCC, there is no
pending review by the FCC and no Orders have been issued. As a result, Cox Cable is not
obligated to adjust the CPST rates or basic service tier rates in the town of Vinton.
I
Based on the foregoing, it appears the rates outlined in FCC 1240 for both the town of
Vinton and the City of Roanoke have been accurately calculated by Cox Cable using FCC form
1240. We find no mathematical errors in Cox Cable's calculations and the forms appear to be
correctly completed in compliance with the regulations. With respect to the county of Roanoke,
there remains a question whether the issues uncovered by the FCC in its November 21, 1997,
Order will remain applicable. Pending the outcome of Cox Cable's Petition for Reconsideration
subscribers may receive refunds for overcharges on the CPST rates. If this occurs, it is likely
that a corresponding reduction in the basic service tier rates will also be appropriate and may
result in refund liability on the basic tiers as well.
However, given that no decision from the FCC has yet been issued on Cox Cable's
petition for reconsideration, it would appear pYcdent to discuss uritr Cox Cable some form of
letter agreement whereby Cox Cable will preserve the Cm's right to mandate refund liability ?
back in time while it awaits the FCC's decision. By entering into such an agreement, the City
will not be waiving any of its rights to order applicable refunds but at the same time will not be
forced to issue a rate order and defend the inevitable appeal to the FCC by Cox Cable. I have
asked Cox Cable to prepare such a letter for our review and consideration and expect same
shortly.
No additional action is required by either the city, town or county with respect to FCC
forms 1240 or 1205. FCC regulations provide that if any of the communities should
subsequently find an error in Cox Cable's calculations, or if the information should become
available to you that suggests an error in the calculations, you will have the right to order refunds
up to one year from the date of filing of these forms (on or about November 27, 1997).
t, \' t
Ccs , ,/
MOSS & BARNETT
A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
Gary Tegenkamp, Joseph B. Obenshain, William Heartwell, III
January 15, 1998
Page 5
If you should have any questions regarding this letter, or if I can provide any additional
assistance or information, please feel free to contact me. Otherwise, I will forward to the county
a draft letter of agreement with Cox Cable for its review and consideration as soon as it becomes
available.
Very truly yours.
Brian T. Grogan
BTG/rlb
156362/3CN#01 !.DOC
t
June 24, 1998
Mr. Joseph B. Obenshain
Senior Assistant County Attorney
County of Roanoke
PO Box 29800
Roanoke, VA 24018-0798
Attachment "B"
5400 Fallowater Lane SW
Roanoke, Virginia 24014
P.O. Box 13726
Roanoke, Virginia 24036EM
Fa (540)776-3845
Fax (540)776-3847
C Olt
COMMUNICATIONS
Re: CoxCom, Inc. d.b.a. CoxCom, Inc.
County of Roanoke CPS Complaint to the FCC
CUID #: VA0151
Dear Mr. Obenshain:
The purpose of this letter is to provide the County of Roanoke with the required Federal
Communications Commission (FCC) Form 1240 to support our CPS tier rate. The County has
indicated intent to file a complaint with the FCC concerning our March 1, 1998 rate change and
this is our response to your letter of intent. Cox's response is being made within the requested
time period.
Upon reviewing the County of Roanoke's draft of the FCC Form 329, the current rates are stated
correctly without franchise fees and the FCC User Fee. Enclosed are two FCC Form 1240's and
the related supporting documents for your review. I have also included a copy of the
notification letter sent to the FCC dated January 21, 1998 indicating of our intent to change CPS
rates as it contains information pertinent to rate computations.
If the County decides to file a complaint, please forward a copy of our response to the FCC with
your complaint.
If you should have any questions please contact me at 776-3844 extension 155. I will be glad to
assist you.
Sincerely,
W , 9;/40t-
John
W. Bingham, CPA
Business Manager
Enclosure
cc: Johnny Benson, Acting General Manager
Kathy Payne, Cox Communications, Inc.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, JULY 28, 1998
RESOLUTION 072898-8 CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS HELD
IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened
an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in
accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the
Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was
conducted in conformity with Virginia law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge:
1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements
by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution
applies, and
2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening
the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors
of Roanoke County, Virginia.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Certification Resolution, and carried
by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Brenda J. Holto , CMC
Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Executive Session
A-072898-9
ACTION NUMBE
ITEM NUMBER
S-1
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
AGENDA ITEM: Request for adoption of Drainage Maintenance Projects for FY98/99.
• X11 ► :� •: •1111
During the July 28, 1998 work session early this evening, the Board of Supervisors
approved the attached drainage projects for inclusion into the Drainage
Maintenance Priority List for FY98/99.
No additional funding is being requested.
Staff recommends approval of these additional drainage projects for inclusion into
the Drainage Maintenance Priority List.
S B ITTED BY: APPROVED BY:
A?r ak Covey, Director Elmer C. Hodge
Department of Community Dev lopment County Administrator
1
EXHIBIT "B"
PROPOSED PROJECTS
P-238 - P-271
P-242 Dean Thompson
2730 Tulip Lane
DESCRIPTION: STABILIZE OUTFALL OF STORM SEWER
ESTIMATED COST: $12,000
TAX MAP # 61.11-1-47-5
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: VINTON
P-243 Craig and Kathy Dickerson
2817 Emissary Drive
DESCRIPTION: RECONSTRUCT CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $5,000
TAX MAP # 36.20-4-22
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CATAWBA
P-244 Robert Lindsey
6744 Mallard Lake Drive
DESCRIPTION: REPAIR EXISTING STORM SEWER
ESTIMATED COST: $15,000
TAX MAP # 96.03-3-10
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CAVE SPRING
P-247 Paul Diagle
4566 Girard Drive
DESCRIPTION: REPLACE EXISTING INADEQUATE
STORM SEWER IN CONJUNCTION
WITH VDOT IMPROVEMENTS
ESTIMATED COST: $15,000
TAX MAP # 77.17-2-11
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CAVE SPRING
P-248 Kenneth Paitsel
2639 Stanford Drive
DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT ADEQUATE CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $6,000
TAX MAP # 44.04-3-5
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CATAWBA
P-248 R. W. Minter
2659 Standford Drive
DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT ADEQUATE CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $12,000
TAX MAP # 44.04-3-8
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CATAWBA
PRJECI
E STATUSa°
P-252 Anne Wealti
1311 Deer Run Drive
DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT ADEQUATE CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $10,000
TAX MAP # 61.04-2-53
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: VINTON
P-253 Linda D. Stover Barker
4435 Wyndale Avenue
DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT ADEQUATE CHANNEL AND
STORM SEWER SYSTEM IN
CONJUNCTION WITH VDOT
IMPROVEMENTS
ESTIMATED COST: $10,000
TAX MAP # 76.68-6-44
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: WINDSOR HILLS
P-254 Francis Brookman
2719 Beaver Brook Drive
DESCRIPTION: STABILIZE EXISTING CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $5,000
TAX MAP # 44.04-4.11
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CATAWBA
P-255 Dennis Guthrie
4962 Bower Road
DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT ADEQUATE CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $4,500
TAX MAP # 76.07-3-25
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: WINDSOR HILLS
PROJECT NAME STATUS ?—I
P-260 Lynn Johnson
4490 Brentwood Court
DESCRIPTION: STABILIZE EXISTING CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $5,000
TAX MAP # 86.08-7-24
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: WINDSOR HILLS
P-261 Tim Kennedy
5546 Ambassador Drive
DESCRIPTION: STABILIZE EXISTING CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $10,000
TAX MAP # 36.20-4-32
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CATAWBA
Richard Taylor
5554 Ambassador Drive
DESCRIPTION: STABILIZE EXISTING CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $10,000
TAX MAP # 36.20-4-32
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CATAWBA
P-262 Jason Beach
1446 Lori Drive
DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT STABILE CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $18,000
TAX MAP # 79.03-2-28
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: VINTON
PROJECT NAME STATUS »
P-267 Ms. Romanus
4206 Kings Chase Drive
DESCRIPTION: STABILIZE EXISTING CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $5,000
TAX MAP #97.08-02-02
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CAVE SPRING
P-268 Paul Shumaker
1541 Mountain Heights
DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT ADEQUATE CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $3,500
TAX MAP # 35.04-01-17
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CATAWBA
P-269 Richard Rader
3582 Colony Lane
DESCRIPTION: STABILIZE CHANNEL
ESTIMATED COST: $2,000
TAX MAP # 77.19-02-19
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: CAVE SPRING
ROANOKE COUNTY
DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
FY 98-99 PROJECTS
a
U
a
Dennis Lane Rt 111
x
Q
Uti
BERNICE DORAN
1290 DENNIS LN.
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 35-04-2-67
P-238
ROANOKE COUNTY
DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
FY 98-99 PROJECTS
ELIZABETH UNDERWOOD
143 MISSIMER CT.
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 61-19-10-25
P-240
ROANOKE COUNTY
DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
FY 98-99 PROJECTS
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
DEAN THOMPSON
2730 TULIP LN.
61.11-1-47.5
P-242
ROANOKE COUNTY
DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
FY 98-99 PROJECTS
ROBERT LINDSEY
6744 MALLARD LAKE D R .
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 96.03-3-10
P-244
ROANOKE COUNTY
DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
FY 98-99 PROJECTS
Old Manor
Dr. Rt. )927927
Magnolia Rd•
Harrison Cr.
CD
c
N
Oak Rd -
water
° r
� o
o �
0
70
a
rt
Cal
Stokes Dr.
Santee Rd.
TODD RANIO
820 HARMON RD.
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 38.08-5-6
P-246
ROANOKE COUNTY
DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
FY 98-99 PROJECTS
BARBARA HANSEL 1
4514 HAMMOND LN.
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 77.17-2-20 & 21
P-247
ROANOKE COUNTY
DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
FY 98-99 PROJECTS
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
KENNETH PAITSEL
2639 STANFORD DR.
44.04-3-5
P-248
ROANOKE COUNTY
DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
FY 98-99 PROJECTS
R.D. L'E'ERS
7519 MILK -A -WAY DR.
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 27.10-8-1
P-250
ROANOKE COUNTY
DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
FY 98-99 PROJECTS
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
MS. ANNE WAELTI
1311 DEER RUN DR.
61.04-2-53
P-252
L
Emmett Lane
Private Road
ROANOKE COUNTY
DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
FY 98-99 PROJECTS
a
�Rt6�41�
ane
D,uXbur9 Z,
l -
FRANCIS
BROOKMAN
2719 BEAVER BROOK RD.
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 44.04-4-11
P-254
ROANOKE COUNTY
DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
FY 98-99 PROJECTS
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
MRS. HOWARD
5701 PINE ACRES LN.
86.16-2-29
P-256
ROANOKE COUNTY
DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
FY 98-99 PROJECTS
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
NORMAN RONK
3317 GARNER LN.
36.08-1-1
P-258
ROANOKE COUNTY
DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM•
FY 98-99 PROJECTS
LYNN JOHNSON
4490 BRENT-WOOD CT.
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 86-08-7-24
P-260
ROANOKE COUNTY
DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
FY 98-99 PROJECTS
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
RICHARD TAYLOR
5554 AMBASSADOR DR.
36.20-4-31
P-261
ROANOKE COUNTY
DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
FY 98-99 PROJECTS�'°
MICHAEL WHITESIDE
6116 STEEPLECHASE DR.
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 86.01-2-36 & 37
P-263
ROANOKE COUNTY
DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
FY 98-99 PROJECTS
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
JAMES MONEYHUN
3007 TREE TOP LN.
87.09-2-40
P-265
ROANOKE COUNTY
DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
FY 98-99 PROJECTS
MS. ROMANUS
4208 KINGS'S CHASE DR.
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 97.08-2-2
P-267
moi' j
ROANOKE COUNTY
DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
FY 98-99 PROJECTS
RICHARD RADER
3582 COLONY LN.
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 77.19-2-19
P-269
.r
ROANOKE COUNTY
DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
FY 98-99 PROJECTS
SARA COLE & KATHRYN DAVIS
1529 DALMATION DR.
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 36.03-1-30
P-271
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, JULY 28, 1998
ORDINANCE 072898-10 AUTHORIZING THE VACATION OF A PORTION
OF AN EXISTING 20 -FOOT DRAINAGE EASEMENT RECORDED ON
PLAT FOR BOTETOURT SOUTH, SECTION 5, PLAT BOOK 18, PAGE 91,
AND LOCATED ON LOT 1, BLOCK 2, SECTION 1, ORCHARD PARK,
PLAT BOOK 19, PAGE 29, HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
WHEREAS, by subdivision plat entitled 'Plat Showing "THE ORCHARDS" Section
No. 5 "BOTETOURT SOUTH",' dated May 19, 1995, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of
the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Plat Book 18, page 91, a 20 -foot (20')
drainage easement was shown and created across the remaining property of F & W
Community Development Corporation; and,
WHEREAS, a portion of said remaining property, over which the drainage easement
is shown, has been subdivided and is designated as Lot 1, Block 2, Section 1, Orchard
Park, as shown on plat entitled 'Plat Showing Section No. 1 "ORCHARD PARK',' dated
September 3, 1996, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 19, page 29,
and further designated on the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map No. 40.05-5-1,
Hollins Magisterial District; and
WHEREAS, F & W Community Development Corporation is the current owner of
Lot 1, Block 2, Section 1, Orchard Park; and
WHEREAS, the drainage plan for Orchard Park Subdivision has been altered from
its original design and drainage facilities are no longer required in this location; and
WHEREAS, §15.2-2272.2 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, requires that
such action be accomplished by the adoption of an ordinance by the governing body; and,
WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by §15.2-2204 of the 1950 Code of
Virginia, as amended, and first reading of this ordinance was held on July 14, 1998; and
the public hearing and second reading of this ordinance was held on July 28, 1998.
THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That a portion of a 20' drainage easement across property owned by F & W
Community Development Corporation, shown cross -hatched and designated as "PORTION
OF EXIST. 20' DRAINAGE EASEMENT TO BE VACATED" upon a plat entitled 'Request
to Vacate 20 Foot Drainage Easement Recorded in Plat Book 18, Page 91, Botetourt
South -Section 5' and prepared by the Roanoke County Department of Community
Development, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, be, and hereby is, vacated;
and,
2. That the County Administrator, or an Assistant County Administrator, is
hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary
to accomplish this vacation and acquisition, all of which shall be on form approved by the
County Attorney.
3. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption,
and a certified copy of this ordinance shall be recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit
Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in accordance with Section 15.2-2272.2 of the Code
of Virginia (1950, as amended).
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
2
AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Brenda J. Holton, CMC
Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development
John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
c
6XUT1NG 20' \
WATER L1NE EASEME �.
R • 19 Pyr. 29 s \ \
F
C�
.Z \ I
m Q
a_ \
��lOR9 � A 8 645 51'08"E
8 G 5 36'?4`49"c`
44; 8B'
REQUEST TO VACATE
20 FOOT DRAINAGE EASEMENT
Recorded in
Plat Book I8, Page 91
Botetourt South - Section 5
Located on
Lot 1, Block 2 (Tax Parcel: 40.05-5-1)
In
Orchard Park - Section 1
Recorded in
Plat Book 19, Page 29
ROANOKE COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
F & W 6OMMUN1rY OFVEGOPMENr
`60RPORATION
0,x.962 PG,651(904.60)
lb
f TAX"�0.05.5-!
A) Lar t
1 f A vie LINE ON6Y
54811*4136a
p, 5, Iq PG, 34)
LOT 2
pRGNAR� PA-t�,rG --
��I
(P -IN VA2lEs� ��
REQUEST TO VACATE
20 FOOT DRAINAGE EASEMENT
Recorded in
Plat Book 18, Page 91
Botetourt South - Section 5
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER, TUESDAY, JULY 28, 1998
ORDINANCE 072898-11 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF
A .709 -ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED ON ROUTE 460
BETWEEN TRAIL DRIVE AND WEST RURITAN ROAD (PORTION OF TAX
MAP NOS. 50.05-1-19 AND 50.05-1-20) IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL
DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-1 TO THE
ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF C-2 WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE
APPLICATION OF CICERO HALL, JR.
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on June 23, 1998, and the
second reading and public hearing were held July 28, 1998; and,
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on
this matter on July 7, 1998; and
WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as
follows:
1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing .709
acre, as described herein, and located on Route 460 between Trail Drive and West
Ruritan Road, (Portion of Tax Map Numbers 50.05-1-19 and 50.05-1-20) in the Hollins
Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of C-1, Office District,
to the zoning classification of C-2, General Commercial District.
2. That this action is taken upon the application of Cicero Hall, Jr.
3. That the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing the
following conditions which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby
accepts:
1
1) Use of the property will be limited to:
a) Personal Services
b) All uses permitted in the C1 zoning district.
2) The proposed parking area shown on the preliminary layout will be
developed, and cross easements will be established, to allow the future connection of the
parking area to the adjacent site designated "New Parcel C-1" on the Preliminary
Subdivision Plat prepared for ACW Management Corporation, dated June 16, 1998.
3) The architecture, design and materials of the proposed building wil
substantially conform to the photograph entitled "Exhibit A" submitted for review to the
Roanoke County Planning Commission on July 7, 1998.
4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows:
BEGINNING at Corner #1, said point located on the northerly right-of-way of Trail
Drive, said point also being the easterly property line of property of Robert A. and
Patricia C. Hope; thence leaving Trail Drive and with Hope, N 75 deg. 08'25" W
135.65 feet to Corner #2, said point being the southwesterly corner of remaining
property of Cicero H. Hall, Jr. and Doris B. Hall; thence leaving Hope and with Hall,
N 28 deg. 03' 25" W 30.91 feet to Corner #3, said point being the northwesterly
corner of New Parcel C-1; thence leaving remaining property of Hall and with the
southerly boundary of New Parcel C-1, N 50 deg. 26'25" E 278.51 feet to Corner
#4, said point being the southeasterly corner of New Parcel C-1, said point also
located on the northerly right-of-way of U.S. Route 460; thence leaving Parcel C-1
and with the northerly right-of-way of Route 460 for the following 3 courses; thence
with a curve to the left which said curve is defined by a delta angle of 0 deg. 25' 22",
a radius of 2,704.79 feet, an arc of 19.95 feet, a chord of 19.95 feet and bearing S
37 deg. 58' 01" E to Corner #5; thence S 70 deg. 35" W 10.68 feet to Corner #6;
thence S 40 deg. 26'25" E 72.18 feet to Corner #7; thence with a curve to the right,
which said curve is defined by a delta angle of 87 deg. 52' 00", a radius of 30.00,
an arc of 46. 01, a chord of 41.63 and being S 03 deg. 29' 35" W to Corner #8, said
point located on northerly right-of-way of Trail Drive; thence leaving U. S. Route
460 and with Trail Drive for the following 2 courses; S 47 deg. 35' 35" W 119.74
feet to Comer #9; thence with a curve to the left, which curve is defined by a delta
angle of 29 deg. 20' 00", a radius of 100.00, an arc of 51.20, a chord of 50.64 and
bearing S 32 deg. 45' 35" W to Corner #1, the place of Beginning and containing
RFA
30,870 square feet (.709 acre).
5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this
ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed
to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized
by this ordinance.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Al'iez.11 Q. 4Qt�
Brenda J. Holto , CMC
Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development
Terry Harrington, County Planner
John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
3
J
J
S
Cfl
U)
O p ,
Ln
Ln
J
c- ¢ X
Sa
0
� 3
U N
U
•
• r
M
U r
N
O ¢ I
LQ
Sao
LL,
[L ci
OLn
w
IL X
vto
1\
§1
;N
qa11 � I
m
0
J
W
LL-
O } r k
�QLnOf
�2�o
Laa W
0zo
d ¢ X N
} ¢
cr F
z
W
S
LL -Q
ui LU <
Z fj 0;:
LoCL X
� � \� � 3.�Z.9ZD�i3 • _
� r ,19'8LZ
Ln m Ln
I Lit
ci
ztltz J Q Ln
lu III
,o,.G'
CD
CL *L*611
.aa gMll
zo
0
N
in
a
I
Li N
� Ln l�
Li.l O 0
W
O W z
d Q X N
i
U- cn
r
R a>!
} ¢ ► ►
LU ¢ o 0
Ln Z
L7 0
CL X N
I > H
Ld
m
0 Np
a�
LL N
O p I
co
Li U N
O Y? I N
¢
U
¢
z
LJ a W
i CL W
Cr �- �p
J �¢O�O
OOX
a Z¢ X N
�L� N
Q7 F¢-
L` <
Lo
5;
► ,
p
�-'
!
U-W
o
w
>~
Uva
s
ES
COo
-
T
j
w
W
z z
p
ov
d
Q
O�
U7
O
w
d cin o
N
E
v
1 d
z
o
o
O
II
w a
Q
Q
Qz
W
C)
zo
0
N
in
a
I
Li N
� Ln l�
Li.l O 0
W
O W z
d Q X N
i
U- cn
r
R a>!
} ¢ ► ►
LU ¢ o 0
Ln Z
L7 0
CL X N
I > H
Ld
m
0 Np
a�
LL N
O p I
Li U N
O Y? I N
<�
LJ a W
i CL W
Cr �- �p
J �¢O�O
OOX
a Z¢ X N
�L� N
Q7 F¢-
L` <