Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
4/27/1999 - Adopted Board Records
A-042799-1 ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER 4�F601 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 27, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: Approval of the Roanoke County Bonding Committee's recommendation to formally declare Hanging Rock Estates, L.L.C., to be in default under their Land Subdivider's Agreement dated June 23, 1995, Off -Site Sewer Agreement dated November 26, 1996, and Erosion and Sediment Control Agreement dated June 23, 1995. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: Hanging Rock Estates, L.L.C., is the developer of Hanging Rock Estates Subdivision, which is more particularly described as tax parcel number 35.04-4-1 through 48, in the Catawba Magisterial District. On June 23, 1995, revised July 1, 1997, the developer submitted a Land Subdivider's Agreement between the developer and the County in evidence of their willingness to construct, install and provide at the said subdivider's sole expense "those certain improvements described and shown on the stamped approved construction plans" in accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance (Land Subdivider's Agreement, p.2, 11). On the same date, the developer entered into an Erosion and Sediment Control Agreement that required the developer to ensure the installation, maintenance, and performance measures provided for on approved plans or revisions thereof for the control of siltation and erosion (Erosion and Sediment Control Agreement, ¶7). The developer, on November 26, 1996 revised July 1, 1997, entered into an Off -Site Sewer Agreement with Roanoke County to construct and install all of the physical improvements and facilities at the said subdivider's sole expense shown on the stamped approved construction plans for the Hanging Rock Estates Off -Site Sewer Extension. Performance Bonds to guarantee proper and satisfactory installation according to approved plans were also submitted with these agreements. 1 `V96 ► Currently, the improvements associated with this project have not been accepted by either Roanoke County or the Virginia Department of Transportation. County staff has been working with Hanging Rock Estates, L.L.C., since January of 1998 to establish a schedule for completing the physical improvements. Even though some progress was made last summer, there has been no activity on the site since November of 1998. On March 2, 1999, the Roanoke County Bonding Committee met to discuss the status of construction at Hanging Rock Estates Subdivision. A progress report was presented to the Bonding Committee with discussion on the remaining improvements needed to be completed both on-site and off-site in order to comply with approved construction plans. The Bonding Committee instructed the Director of Community Development to send a letter to Hanging Rock Estates, L.L.C., listing outstanding items that needed to be addressed, completion dates and notice that if the dates are not met, Hanging Rock Estates, L.L.C., would be considered in default. Hanging Rock Estates, L.L.C., was notified by letter on March 8, 1999 that if the items outlined in the letter were not completed within the specified dates, Hanging Rock Estates, L.L.C., would be considered in default. On April 8, 1999, Hanging Rock Estates, L.L.C., was notified by Roanoke County that the Bonding Committee plans to submit a report to the Board of Supervisors on April 27, 1999 declaring Hanging Rock Estates, L.L.C., in default. The reason for this action is Hanging Rock Estates's failure to comply with the schedule outlined in Roanoke County's March 8`h letter. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Roanoke County Bonding Committee recommends to the Board the following: Hanging Rock Estates, L.L.C., be formally declared in default on the above referenced project; 2. the Director of Community Development be authorized to make demand of the surety (Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland) on Hanging Rock Estates, L.L.C., bond for payment of the funds in full for application to completion of the project, pursuant to Section IX, Subsection B.3., of the Roanoke County Bonding Policy; 2 3. the Director of Community Development be authorized to contract for and on behalf of Roanoke County for the completion of the project, pursuant to Section IX, Subsection B.3., of the Roanoke County Bonding Policy; and 4. the County Attorney be authorized to institute other measures as he may deem appropriate to enforce the provisions of the Roanoke County Bonding Policy, the Land Subdivider's Agreement dated June 23, 1995, and Land Subdivider's Bond, the Erosion and Sediment Control Agreement dated June 23, 1997, and Erosion and Sediment Control Bond, the Site Agreement dated July 1, 1997, and Performance Bond, and all applicable local, state and federal code provisions, pursuant to Section IX, Subsection B.1, of the Roanoke County Bonding Policy. ALTERNATIVES AND IMPACT: Approval of Roanoke County Bonding Committee's recommendation to formally declare Hanging Rock Estates, L.L.C., in default on Hanging Rock Estates Subdivision and approval of all additional recommendations of the Bonding Committee as specifically set forth above. Authorize and direct the Director of Community Development and the County Attorney to initiate said approved actions and demand be made of the surety on the developer's bond for payment of the funds secured thereby for application to completion of the project. 2. Decline to approve the Bonding Committee's recommendations. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative #1. SU$MITTED BY: APPROVED BY: I &L Z nold Covey, birector Elmer C. Hodge Department of Community evelopment County Administrator Aw Paul M. Mahoney Don C. Myers County Attorney Assistant County Administrator ---------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by: Fenton F. Harrison to approve Johnson _ x Denied () staff recommendation Harrison _ x Received () McNamara_ I x Referred () Minnix _ x To () Nickens _ x cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator 0 A-042799-2 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER—,2!, AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 27, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: Primary Election. Request for additional funding for the June 8, 1999 Republican COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: The cost for this election was not included in the 1998-99 budget due to the fact that the Republican Party did not call for this primary until March, 1999. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Estimated cost for this election as follows: Election Officials for 20 precincts $ 9,850 Ballots – Machine & Paper 700 Rent of Trucks to move machines 700 Set up machines & election day service 1,000 Rent of Voting Places 120 Total $12,370 FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are requested from the General Fund unappropriated balance. 4E. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of additional funds in the amount of $12,370 from the General Fund unappropriated balance. Submitted by, Diane St.John Registrar Approved by, 44��Kofl� Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE No Yes Approved (x) Motion by: H. Odell Minnix amended Johnson _ x Denied () motion to approve appropriation from Harrison _ x Received () Board Contingency Fund McNamara_ x Referred () Minnix _ x To () Nickens _ x cc: File Diane St. John, Registrar Diane H. Hyatt, Director, Finance Abs A-042799-3 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 27, 1999 SUBJECT: Request for Approval of FY 1999-00 Cable Television Budget COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Roanoke County, the City of Roanoke, and the Town of Vinton jointly operate Roanoke Valley Television (RVTV). The initial equipment and facilities for the television studio were funded through a capital grant from Cox Communications in the amount of $480,00. The studio is located at the Jefferson Center, and currently employs four full time staff members, in addition to part time personnel. The staff produces videos and shows for the local governments and school systems which are cablecast along with government meetings on Cox Communications Channel 3 and Adelphia Communications Channel 3 in the West County area. RVTV is governed by the Roanoke Valley Regional Cable Television Committee, which includes representatives from the City, the County, and the Town. The operation budget for RVTV is provided by the three governments, based on the proportion of Cox customers located in each jurisdiction. The governing bodies have informally agreed to provide up to 20% of the franchise fee paid by Cox Communications to fund the operations of the facility. This year, due to an audit conducted by Cox, the County's percentage of the cable subscribers has increased from 33% to 39%, with a resultant increase in the amount of the franchise fee and in the amount of the operating budget paid by the County. During 1998-99, RVTV has produced the following for the County: ten departmental videos or public service announcements, 12 Roanoke County Todays, 24 live Board meetings, and has also provided upkeep of the Message Board. During the past year, video production at the studio has increased 45%, show production has increased 12% and the average hours of programming per month has increased by 88%. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Roanoke Valley Cable Television Committee has approved the attached budget for the Fiscal Year 1999-00 for the operation of RVTV. The budget includes the following highlights: 4-3 Re-classification of the Station Manager position from Grade 25 on the County pay scale to Grade 26. The change in salary compensates for a change in scope of responsibilities, and increase in the number of people supervised, the quality of RVTV productions, and internal equity for the position. Addition of another full time position and the elimination of regular part-time positions. Because of the increase in workload over the last year the current staff cannot take on additional programs or live government meetings. This will allow for a low turnover rate among employees, greater flexibility for the localities in terms of adding new programming, and will eliminate part- time funds in the next two budget cycles. Cable Television staff is carried on the County's payroll and benefit system and will receive the same increase as County employees. The proposed budget includes 3.6% for raises for the staff, but actual raises will be at the County rate. FISCAL IMPACT: The total RVTV budget request is $226,085, of which Roanoke County's share is 39%, or $88,173, an increase of $21,361 over last year's budget. The total franchise fee paid by Cox to Roanoke County last year is $552,913, (an increase from $405,000) and 20% of that is $110,582, or $22,409 less than this budget request. RECOMMENDATION: The Cable Television Committee recommends that the Board approve this budget request in the amount of $88,173. Anne Marie Green, APR Elmer C. Hodge Director, Community Relations County Administrator Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Motion by: Harry C. Nickens to adopt Johnson _ x budget and commend staff for enhanced Harrison _ x coverage McNamara_ x cc: File Sandy Eakin, Clerk, Roanoke Valley Cable Television Committee Elaine Simpson, Roanoke Valley Television Station Manager Anne Marie Green, Director, Community Relations Minnix _ x _ Nickens _ x E-3 RVTV Proposed 1999-2000 Budget Increase over last year: $28,415.00 or 14% Budget Proposed 1010 Regular 103,060.00 128,424.00 1020 Part -Time 8,320.00 0 2100 FICA - Employer Contribution 8,521.00 9,824.00 2200 Retirement - VRS 13,150.00 17,607.00 2300 Group Health Insurance 6,078.00 14,275.00 2310 Group Dental Insurance 280.00 510.00 2400 Life Insurance - VSRS 361.00 0 3013 Professional Services - Other 7,500.00 5,500.00 3202 Repairs (Office Equipment) 500.00 500.00 3209 Repairs (Other Equipment) 1,000.00 2,000.00 3530 Printed Forms 500.00 250.00 3610 Advertising 500.00 2,000.00 5210 Postage 250.00 250.00 5230 Telephone 2,600.00 2,800.00 5235 Car Phones 300.00 350.00 5305 Motor Vehicle Insurance 1,600.00 1,500.00 5308 General Liability Insurance 1,100.00 1,745.00 5410 Lease/Rent of Equipment 500.00 500.00 5420 Lease/Rent of Buildings 26,600.00 26,600.00 5501 Travel (Mileage) 250.00 250.00 5504 Travel (Convention & Conference) 1,000.00 1,000.00 5520 Dinner Meetings & Luncheons 500.00 500.00 5540 Training & Education 6,000.00 1,000.00 5801 Dues & Association Membership 700.00 700.00 6010 Office Supplies - General 1,000.00 1,500.00 6013 Small Equipment & Supplies 1,000.00 2,000.00 6014 Video Supplies 3,000.00 3,500.00 6080 Gas, Oil & Grease 500.00 500.00 6202 Subscriptions 1,000.00 500.00 Total $197,670.00 $226,085.00 Increase over last year: $28,415.00 or 14% Cox Communications 1998 Franchise Fees Cox Communications paid a 5% franchise fee to the local governments in 1998 which amounted to $1,417,727.00. The local governments have traditionally agreed to allocate up to 20% of the franchise fees collected to the RVTV Operating Budget. For the coming year, that amount would be $283,545.40. RVTV is requesting a budget of $226,085.00. which is $57,460.40 less than that amount. Cox calculates the percentage of subscribers (March `99) in each locality as follows: Localitv Subscribers Percentage City 32,046 56% County 22,637 39% Vinton 2,798 5% Based on those figures, each locality's contribution to an Operating Budget of $226,085 would be as follows: City $126,608 County $88,173 Vinton $11,304 A-042799-4 ACTION # ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 27, 1999 SUBJECT: Request for Funding for Annual Citizen Satisfaction Survey COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND INFORMATION: In 1997, after the most recent citizen survey, the Board of Supervisors asked to conduct a satisfaction survey biannually rather than every year. At the Board retreat in January, the Board instructed staff to obtain proposals for a survey and report back with the cost and schedule. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Citizen surveys are an important and effective method for obtaining information about perceptions and beliefs. In order to be useful, they should be pretested and unbiased, a reasonable length, and an appropriate number of random respondents must be interviewed. While surveys may be conducted by mail, telephone interviews offer a fast and cost- effective method of interviewing residents, while providing anonymity to the respondents. They also provide control over who responds to the questions and a far greater response rate. The two recent surveys were conducted in the late spring, by telephone, with 500 randomly selected, but statistically representative, households contacted. The questionnaire took ten minutes to complete, and the responses were tabulated by zip code, age and gender. The results provided a benchmark against which the County measured its provision of services and the satisfaction of our citizens. To be most effective, however, surveys should be conducted annually to track performance over a period of time. The Procurement Department issued a request for proposals for administration of a new survey based on the above criteria, and the sole response was from Martin Research, the firm which conducted the 1995 and 1997 surveys. Martin Research proposed a base price of $10,250, which includes pre -testing, surveying of 500 households, and compilation of the data, as well as an executive summary of the results. The survey can be administered within 30 days of finalization of the document. FISCAL IMPACT: The survey will cost $10,250. Funds are available in the Board Contingency Account. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve the request to appropriate $10,250 from the Board Contingency Account to fund a citizen satisfaction survey to provide information for the Board and staff on various operations and functions of County government. 2. Do not approve the request. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this request, so that the Board and Staff will have recent information to use in the decision making process. Anne Marie Green, APR Director, Community Relations Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson to aprove Johnson _ x _ Denied () appropriation Harrison _ x _ Received () McNamara_ x _ Referred () Minnix _ x _ To () Nickens x cc: File Anne Marie Green, Director, Community Relations Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, APRIL 27, 1999 ORDINANCE 042799-5 AUTHORIZING ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY AT 5445 GLENMARY DRIVE FROM LOTTIE B. DICKERSON FOR AN ACCESS ROAD INTO THE ROANOKE COUNTY CENTER FOR RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY WHEREAS, in order to provide additional land for an industrial access road into the Roanoke County Center for Research & Technology, the County requires a certain parcel of land, consisting of 1.49 acres in the Catawba Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke, Virginia, owned by Lottie B. Dickerson; and WHEREAS, staff has negotiated the purchase of said property from Ms. Dickerson for the sum of $80,520.00, the estimated fair market value being $85,000.00 based upon an independent M.A.I. appraisal; and WHEREAS, Ms. Dickerson and the County have entered into a contract of sale, subject to approval by the Board of Supervisors; and, WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs that the acquisition of real estate be accomplished by ordinance; the first reading of this ordinance was held on April 13, 1999; and the second reading was held on April 27, 1999. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to acquire from Lottie B. Dickerson, a 1.49 -acre parcel of land, identified as Tax Map No. 64.00-1-3, together with 1 all rights incident thereto and appurtenances thereunto belonging, for an amount not to exceed $80,520.00. 2. That the purchase price, and estimated closing costs of $ 3,500.00, shall be paid out of the Glenn Mary Industrial Park account. 3. That the County Administrator, or an Assistant County Administrator, is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of the Board of Supervisors in this matter as are necessary to accomplish the acquisition of this property, all of which shall be approved as to form by the County Attorney. 4. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Harrison to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: 6tL'�'Z& Q • /�V-4' Brenda J. Holton, CMC Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Melinda J. Cox, Economic Development Specialist Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 27, 1999 RESOLUTION 042799-6 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM J -CONSENT AGENDA as follows: BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, 1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for April 27, 1999, designated as Item I - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 6, inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of Minutes - March 23, 1999. 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Commission for Senior and Physically Challenged Citizens and Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission. 3. Donation of sanitary sewer easement across property of The Terumah Foundation, Inc., located on Merriman Road. 4. Acceptance by Roanoke County Schools of Summer Youth Employment Program Grant. 5. Acceptance of water and sanitary sewer facilities serving Canterbury Park, Section 12. 6. Write-off of Utility Bad Debts. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any 1 such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the Consent Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Holton, CMC Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Gary Robertson, Director, Utility John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Garland J. Kidd, Director, Vocational and Adult Education Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Dr. Deanna Gordon, School Superintendent Brenda Chastain, Clerk, School Board Vincent K. Copenhaver, Finance Manager 2 A -042799-6.a ACTION NUMBER ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 27, 1999 SUBJECT: Confirmation of appointments to the Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission and Commission for Senior and Physically Challenged Citizens COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The following nominations were made at the April 13, 1999 Board meeting and should now be confirmed. 1. Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission Supervisor Johnson has nominated Donald Witt to serve another three year term which will expire April 8, 2002. 2. Commission for Senior and Physically Challenged Citizens Supervisor Johnson has nominated James W. Huston to represent the Hollins Magisterial District. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the above appointments be confirmed by the Board of Supervisors. 1 SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: Brenda J. Ho on, CMC Elmer C. Hodge Deputy Clerk County Administrator Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION Motion by: H. Odell Minnix to approve 5- a VOTE No Yes Abs Johnson _ x Harrison _ x McNamara_ x Minnix _ x _ Nickens _ x _ cc: File Commission for Senior and Physically Challenged Citizens File Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission File 2 A -042799-6.b ACTION NO. ITEM NO. J-3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 27, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: Donation of sanitary sewer easement across property of The Terumah Foundation, Inc., located on Merriman Road, to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: FRIA? R—AMMIA=dAW� OF M/ This consent agenda item involves acceptance of the following easement conveyed to the Board of Supervisors for sanitary sewer purposes, in the Cave Spring Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke: a) Donation of a sanitary sewer easement, twenty feet (20') in width, from The Terumah Foundation, Inc., a Virginia corporation, (Deed Book 1441, page 1161; Tax Map No. 87.17-6-11.2), as shown on a plat prepared by Shanks Associates, P.C., dated December 22, 1998, a copy of which is attached hereto. The location and dimensions of these easements have been reviewed and approved by the County's engineering staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of this easement. Respectfully submitted, Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney ACTION Approved (x) Motion by: H. Odell Minnix to approve Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( 1 cc: File Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Gary Robertson, Director, Utility John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment VOTE No Yes Abs Johnson _ x Harrison _ x _ McNamara_ x _ Minnix _ x _ Nickens x CARnwG yr Dfftw - RTE 1726 (50' R/H) KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS 70 WT. THAT THE TERUMAH FOUNDA RON, INC. IS 7H£ FEE SIMPLE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN HEREON, SAID PROPERTY HAONG BEEN ACOUIRED BY DEED OF RECORD IN DEED BOOK 1441, PG. 1161 IN THE CLERKS OF77CE OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ROANOKE COUNTY, Y/RGINIA. THE PLA rnIVO AND DEDICA 77ON OF' THE LAND SHOWN HEREON HAS BEEN MADE WIN THE FREE CONSENT CF AND IN ACCORDANCE W174 THE WISHES AND DESIRES OF THE UNDERSIGNED OWNER. IN W/77VESS WHEREOF ARE HEREBY PLACED THE FOLLOWING SIGNATURES AND SEALS ON THIS 9 30tbpA Y CF March 199h. BY.• A " /R , , F THE TERUMAH OUNDA LION, INC. 777LE A — 89 504' R — 2500' T - 24196' L — JR2J' CHQ BRC' —S 59'J,57O' £ ,CND. --UM' TAX PARCEL 87.17-6-11.2 THE 7FRUMAH FOUNDA 77CN INC. h S 80Wxi' W - WI �gSAM. aEAN-our I NEW SAN/TARY &,xf R EASAIEH ?6.97' N BOt71S;�3- E --- PLA T PREPARED FOR 7H£ 7ERUMAH FOUNDA 770N, INC. SHOWINC NEW 20 -FOOT WIDE SAN/TORY SEWR EASEMENT LYING ACROSS A POR17CM CF TAX PARCEL 87.17-6-11.2 CAVE SPRING MAGIST£R/AL DISTRICT ROANOKE COUNTY 14RGINIA ,:gSAI,TH O,C. Lr� � RA1P 0. C NTS T�az/98 No*� 1864 L9'�`D .QTTR�cO J7—"3 NOTE. - THIS PLAT HAS BEEN PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A nnx REpmr AND THEREFORE MAY NOT INDICATE ALL ENCUMBRANCES ON 7NE suLg ECT PROPERTY. MEETING DATE: April 27, 1999 ACTION # A -042799-6.c ITEM NUMBER AGENDA ITEM: Curriculum Development Project - Summer Youth 1999 Grant for $10,948. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: Roanoke County Public Schools has been awarded a Summer Youth grant for the past nine(9) years. The Fifth District Employment & Training Consortium requested an RFP from one of it's contractors to develop a common curriculum framework for all Summer Youth program sites. The objective of the grant is to combine job readiness skills with remediation in math and language arts. Roanoke County Schools will be the financial agent for the grant. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: A team of three teachers, one each from math, language arts, and vocational education, will be selected from the school divisions within the Fifth District Employment & Training Consortium. The selection of each team member will be based upon the individuals experiences in their field and commitment to the completion of the project. The teams will meet on two separate occasions to develop and review the proposed curriculum to be used during the Summer Youth program this coming summer. The objective of the project will be to match the Standards of Learning in Virginia with the job readiness skills as outlined in the nationally known SCANS report. This information will be used to develop a curriculum outline to be used by all Summer Youth providers during the 1999 program. FISCAL IMPACT: The project will be 100% funded by the FDETC on a cost reimbursement basis with indirect cost included in the project. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Ij t1 Staff recommends appropriation of the grant for $10,948 to the_::Summer Youth Employment Program . )6jVVtk - � ( u9 Garland J. Ki d Director of Vocational and Adult Education Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by: H. Odell Minnix to approve Johnson _ x _ Denied () Harrison _ x _ Received () McNamara_ x Referred () Minnix _ x To () Nickens _ x cc: File Garland J. Kidd, Director, Vocational and Adult Education Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance Dr. Deanna Gordon, School Superintendent Brenda Chastain, Clerk, School Board APE. -21' 99 (WED) 14:04 P. 001 BUDGET CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT SUNEMER YOUTH 1999 Salaries: Honorarium for curriculum consultants: 6 (teams @ 3) per team =18 ; x two(2) days, 36 days x $200 per day $ 7,200 Project Coordinator: $ 600 Clerical: PT Secretary @$8.50 per hour X 40 hours $ 375 Inservice Training: $150 per session x 3 = $450 x 2 (trainers) Travel. Team members, trainers and facilitator Printing/duplication of modulesimethodologies Indirect cost: Total budget: $ 900 $ 462 8 600 $ 911 $10,948 A -042799-6.d ACTION # ITEM NUMBER S AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 27, 1999 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities Serving Canterbury Park, Section 12 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:�� SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Developers of Canterbury Park, Section 12, Boone, Boone, & Loeb, Inc., have requested that Roanoke County accept the Deed conveying the water and sanitary the subdivision along with all necessary easements. sewer facilities serving The water and sewer facilities are installed, as shown on plans prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C. entitled Canterbury Park, Section 12, which are on file in the Community Development Department. The water and sanitary sewer facility construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County. FISCAL IMPACT: The value of the water and sanitary sewer construction is $50,150 and $19,270 respectively. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the water and sanitary sewer facilities serving the Canterbury Park, Section 12 subdivision along with all necessary easements, and authorize the County Administrator to execute a Deed for the transfer of these facilities. SUBMITTED BY: Gary Ro Utility E Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) P.E. ACTION APPROVED: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator Motion by: H Odell Minnix to approve cc: File Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney ,Ts VOTE No Yes Abs Johnson _ x Harrison _ x — McNamara— x — Minnix x — Nickens _ x — 1-2'9-1999 2:09PM FROM an RETURN To: ROXNOKE COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFIFICE THIS CHATTEL DEED, made this day ofQ!pm% 19 � 1, by and between: &Vt, Fiv s pC-, , a V &A Ixos *- corporation, hereinafter referred to as the "Developer," party of the first part; and the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, its successors or assigns, hereinafter referred to as the "Board," party of the second part. :WITNESSETH: THAT FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual benefits accruing to the pai-des, thfe receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Developer does hereby GRANT', CONVEY, ASSIGN AND TRANSFER, with the covenants of GENERAL WARRA—VEY OF TITLE, in fee simple unto the Board all water and/or sewer lines, valves, finings, laterals, connections, storage facilities, sources of water supply, pumps, manholes and any and all other equipment and appurtenances thereunto belonging, in and to the water and/or sewer systems in the streets; avenues_ public utility, easement areas; water and sewer easement areas that have been or may hereafter be installed by the Developer, along with the right to perpetually use and occupy the easements in which the same may be located, all of which is more particularly shown, described and designated as follows, to wit: Page 1 of 4 4-E9-1999 2:10PM FROM As shown on the plan entitled�*+4tM-PA4k.5;&-r'.I I Z--- , made P_ 2 and on file m the Roanoke County Engineering Department. The Developer does hereby covenant and warrant that it will be responsible for the proper installation and constriction of the said water and/or sewer systems including repair of surface areas affected by settlement of utility trenches for a period of one (1) year after date of acceptance by the Board and will perform any necessary repairs at its cost. Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby joins in the execution of this instrument to signify the acceptance of this conveyance pursuant to Resolution No. adopted by the Board of.Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, on the day of , 19 Page 2 of 4 A-09-1999 2:10PM FROM P.3 Developer: By: As: THE FOLLOWING signatures and seals: Ti i i State of: 1/ Coluity/ci i2mSl1 , to wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this: !>+ +`— day of ,A�L 19 Its paesobwo'.-T Duly authorized officer (typed name) Title on behalf of. r�;L d7ay 1 IPDaVt.�& My Commission expires: Z— Page 3 of 4 4-L9-1999 2:10PM FROM Approved as to form: Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia j-5 By: (SE kL) County Attorney Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator State of: Virzinia County/City of Roanokg , to wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before nle this: day of , 19 , by Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator, on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. Notary Public My Commission expires: Page 4 of 4 16.1 ROANOKE COUNTY UTILITY DEPARTMENT �v. a S, tf ord Rt 2004 5 QP 4 2-6. 5,525 ACCEPTANCE OF WATER AND SEWER FACILITIES SERVING CANTERBURY PARK , SECTION 12 A -042799-6.e ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER Z� " AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: April 27, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: Write-off of Utility Bad Debt COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: Each year the County writes off the Utility delinquent accounts that are over five years old. This policy is consistent with the procedures used by the Treasurer for the write off of delinquent personal property accounts as prescribed by law. The following efforts have been made to collect these accounts: 1. Collection letters requesting payment. 2. Filing with the Department of Taxation Debt Set-off Program. 3. Filing Warrants in Debt where a valid address is available. 4. Continuing to research for delinquent accounts through the DMV, VEC, and Department of Taxation Records. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The delinquent utility accounts to be written off at this time are: Year Amount Number of Accounts 1994 $7,838.15 39 M:\FINANCE\COMMON\BOARD\4-27-99.WPD April 22, 1999 Total Billing % of Delinquency $9,848,704.00 .08% A comparison of prior year delinquent account write-offs is shown below Year Amount Number of Total Billing % of Delinquency Accounts 1993 $6,389.56 43 $8,636,519.00 .07% 1992 $9,370.49 45 $7,801,429.00 .12% 1991 $4,605.00 32 $7,472,725.00 .06% 1990 $4,084.00 42 $6,289,504.00 .06% STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends writing off the 1994 delinquent accounts. SUBMITTED BY: Lej Vincent K. Copenhaver Finance Manager APPROVED: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE No Yes Abs Approved (x) Motion by: H. Odell Minnix to approve Johnson _ x _ Denied () Harrison _ x Received () McNamara_ x Referred () Minnix _ x _ To () Nickens _ x _ cc: File Vincent K. Copenhaver, Finance Manager M:\FINANCE\COMMON\BOARD\4-27-99.WPD April 22, 1999 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 27, 1999 RESOLUTION 042799-7 CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each member's knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting to which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Certification Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Holto , CMC Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Executive Session AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 27, 1999 RESOLUTION 042799-8 OF CONGRATULATIONS TO GLENVAR HIGH SCHOOL BOYS BASKETBALL TEAM FOR WINNING GROUP A STATE BASKETBALL CHAMPIONSHIP WHEREAS, team sports are an important part of the curriculum at schools in Roanoke County, teaching cooperation, sportsmanship and athletic skill; and WHEREAS, the Glenvar High School Boys Basketball Team won its first Group A state basketball championship this year, beating Pound 63-54; and WHEREAS, team member Bryan Fasnacht was named All -State, All -Region, AII- Timesland, and Region C Player of the Year; Seth Noonkester was named All -District, All - Region, and 2nd Team All -State; and Josh Ward was named All -District; and WHEREAS, Coach Art Lawrence and his teams have had over 200 wins in the past 13 years and five straight trips to the state championship; and Coach Lawrence retired after this season as head coach for the Glenvar Highlanders. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia does hereby extend its sincere congratulations to the members of the GLENVAR HIGH SCHOOL BOYS BASKETBALL TEAM: Charles Fasnacht; Ryan Watson; Jason Underwood; Scott Price; Bryan Fasnacht; Josh Ward; Charlie Wright; Jeremy Cromer; Seth Noonkester; Erik Johnston; Brad Furhman; Cliff Bordewisch; Wayne Waldron, and Head Coach Art Lawrence for their athletic ability, their team spirit, and their commitment to each other; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors extends its best wishes 1 to members of the team, and the school in their future endeavors, and best wishes to . Coach Art Lawrence upon his retirement. On motion of Supervisor Harrison to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Holto , CMC Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Resolutions of Congratulations File Dr. Deanna Gordon, School Superintendent 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 27, 1999 ORDINANCE 042799-9 TO VACATE A PORTION OF A 15 -FOOT SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT ACROSS LOT 2, BLOCK 1, SECTION 12, HUNTING HILLS, PLAT BOOK 9, PAGE 132, IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, by subdivision plat entitled 'MAP OF SECTION NO. 12, HUNTING HILLS," dated October 23, 1978, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in Plat Book 9, page 132, a fifteen -foot (15') sanitary sewer easement was shown and created on Lot 2, Block 1, Section 12, Hunting Hills, the subject easement being designated on said plat as "15' S.S.E."; and, WHEREAS, the Petitioner and the former owners, Lewis and Susanne Royster, have requested that the above-described existing 15' drainage easement, be vacated, and the current owners of Lot 2, Block 1, Section 12, Hunting Hills, Richard and Linnea Clompus, concur with the request; and, WHEREAS, a frame building and a wooden deck on Lot 2 have resulted in an encroachment on the subject sanitary sewer easement and the Petitioners have requested that it be vacated pursuant to § 15.2-2272.2 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended); and, WHEREAS, this vacation will not involve any cost to the County and the affected County departments have raised no objection; and, WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by § 15.2-2204 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), and the first reading of this ordinance was held on April 13, 1999, and the public hearing and second reading of this ordinance was held on April 27, 1999. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the sanitary sewer easement being shown cross -hatched and designated as "Sanitary Sewer Easement (+/- 150' x 15) to be Vacated" on Exhibit A attached hereto, said easement having been dedicated on 'MAP OF SECTION NO. 12, HUNTING HILLS' dated October 23, 1978, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 9, page 132, in the Cave Spring Magisterial District of the County of Roanoke, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to § 15.2-2272 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended), subject to the conditions contained herein. 2. That all costs and expenses associated herewith, including but not limited to publication, survey and recordation costs, shall be the responsibility of the Petitioner. 3. That the County Administrator, or an Assistant County Administrator, is hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish the provisions of this ordinance, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 4. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption, and a certified copy of this ordinance shall be recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, Virginia, in accordance with §15.2-2272.2 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended). 2 On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: &'&�O. 4V'lr�- Brenda J. Hol on, CMC Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney 3 1400 y , VI CINI IT MAP y�5p�o• Y OLA ROC T-`1 NORTH SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT (+ 150' Y 15') TO BE VACATED / EA3tM4�r t own f. OIPJ .dic ,dtd+,ttr, AMA# 1A �c 1 0-547A--• f i D � ° 4, 'i to �• • rcrc w.�cx ` 9 oAR4A r q r.W,r.m• � e 1� �0 • od, .6LAC9 i 6EAAF o'r vo. C'c-1 o p f irr�a ROANOKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SEWER EAASS SHOWING SANITARYY SEWER EEMENT TO BE VACATED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT a AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, APRIL 27, 1999 ORDINANCE 042799-10 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 456.6 -ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED IN THE 5300 BLOCK OF GLENMARY DRIVE (TAX MAP NOS. 54.00-1-2;3 AND 64.00-1-1) IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF PTD WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on February 23, 1999, and the second reading and public hearing were held April 27, 1999; and WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on April 7, 1998 and a work session on April 21, 1998; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 456.6 acres, as described herein, and located in the 5300 block of Glenmary Drive (Tax Map Numbers 54.00-1-2; 3 and 64.00-1-1) in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of R-1, Low Density Residential District, to the zoning classification of PTD, Planned Technology Development District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County. 3. That the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing conditions which are made a part hereof and incorporated herein by reference and which are set out in detail in the submitted materials contained in the attached Exhibit A entitled "Roanoke 1 County Center For Research and Technology, March 24, 1998, Application to Rezone the Property from R-1 to PTD," said materials to include a memorandum dated April 17, 1998, from the Director of the Department Economic Development for Roanoke County regarding conditions pertaining to greenway and trail development at the Center, all of which conditions the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts, with the exception that the Lone Eagle District described on the Preliminary Concept Plan is hereby to be designated as Reserved for Future Development, 4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Beginning at a Y2 -inch capped rebar set in the north right-of-way line of Interstate 81 and Glen Mary Drive, comer to Philip Trompeter & Constance Trompeter Hausman, thence leaving said Interstate and Drive and along Trompeter, N 540 11' 01" W 106.44 feet to a'/. -inch capped rebar set, corner to Emmett I. Jr. and Mary C. Grisso; thence leaving Trompeter and along Grisso, N 510 03' 57" W 238.25 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod found; thence N 410 47'23" W 399.04 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod found; thence S 710 20'01" W 345.58 feet to a 3/4 -inch iron pipe found, comer to H. M. & Karen E. Montgomery; thence leaving Grisso and along Montgomery, Kathleen F. Nichols, and Jayne Melton Hampton & William J. Hampton, N 390 35'40" W 3840.65 feet to a %z -inch capped rebar set in a fence comer in a painted tree line, comer to Hampton and David W. & Constance R. Shelor; thence leaving Hampton and along Shelor, N 530 24' 56" E 3805.08 feet to a %.-inch iron rod found; thence S 010 37'22" E 190.40 feet to a %.-inch iron rod found; thence N 410 16' 31" E 88.69 feet to a %-inch iron rod found, comer to Glenvar Heights Section No. 2; thence leaving Shelor and along Glenvar Heights Section No. 2 the following courses: S 520 15' 12" E 192.90 feet to a %-inch capped rebar set; S 360 31' 18" E 85.00 feet to a %.-inch capped rebar set; S 700 01' 18" E 193.00 feet to a %.-inch capped rebar set; S 540 01' 18" E 85.00 feet to a %.-inch capped rebar set; S 180 01' 18" E 165.00 feet to a %.-inch capped rebar set; N 870 28'42" E 102.00 feet to a Y2 -inch capped rebar set; S 350 01' 18" E 192.00 feet to a'/. -inch rebar found; S 260 01' 18" E passing a 3/4 -inch iron pipe found at 101.70 feet, passing a 3/4 -inch iron pipe found at 206.20 feet, in all 338.00 feet to a %.-inch capped rebar set; S 710 31' 18" E passing a 5/8 -inch iron rod found at 84.10 feet, passing a 5/8 -inch iron found at 141.02 feet, in all 189.00 feet to a %.-inch capped rebar set; S 710 01' 18" E 176.00 feet to a %.-inch capped rebar set; S 400 31' 18" E 182.50 feet to a Y --inch capped rebar set; N 470 56' 33" E 179.59 feet to a Y. -inch capped rebar set; S 320 53' 00" E passing a 5/8 -inch iron rod found at 537.90 feet, passing a %cinch road found at 2161.38 feet, comer to Glenvar Heights Section No. 1, thence leaving Section No. 2 and along Glenvar Heights Section No. 1, in all 2643.72 feet to a Y. - inch capped rebar set; thence along Glenvar Heights Section No. 1, S 300 40' 00" E 820.33 feet to a %-inch capped rebar set; thence S 170 14' 12" W 2.98 feet to a VDOT right-of-way monument found in the west right-of-way of Glenvar Heights Boulevard; thence leaving Glenvar Heights Section No. 1 and along the west right-of-way line of said Boulevard, S 160 39' 28" E 166.64 feet to a VDOT right-of-way monument found; thence S 250 54'06" E 112.17 feet to a VDOT right-of-way monument found in the north right-of-way line of Interstate 81; thence leaving said Boulevard and along Interstate 81 north right-of-way the following courses: S 74° 21' 59" W 260.64 feet to a VDOT right- of-way monument found; S 780 39' 35" W 152.to VDOT right-of-way monument found; S 640 34' 36" W 99.73 feet to a %.-inch capped rebar set; S 620 56' 59" W 255.48 feet to a VDOT right-of-way monument found; S 560 37'49" W 197.29 feet to a VDOT right-of-way monument found; S 670 26' 2 22" W 725.00 feet to a VDOT right-of-way monument found; S 810 41' 10" W 128.80 feet to a VDOT right-of-way monument found; S 730 12'45" W 251.07 feet to a VDOT right-of-way monument found; S 630 09'48" W 266.97 feet to a Y --inch capped rebar set; S 560 59' 16" W 137.92 feet to a %.-inch capped rebar set; S 530 42'48" W 105.50 feet to a VDOT right-of-way monument found; N 290 06' 26" W 148.57 feet to a VDOT right-of-way monument found; S 640 46' 41" W 26.63 feet to a VDOT right-of-way monument found, corner to Martin Gale & Gary Wayne Gallimore; thence leaving said right-of-way and along Gallimore N. 460 50'43" W 233.58 feet to a 2 -inch iron pipe found; thence N. 520 54' 24" W 17.59 feet to a 3/4 -inch iron pipe found; thence S 540 40' 01" W 91.57 feet to a 3/4 - inch iron pipe found; thence S 310 54' 33" E 271.32 feet to a Y2 -inch capped rebar set in the north right-of-way of Interstate 81; thence leaving Gallimore and along said right-of-way S 770 12' 57" W 40.86 feet to a VDOT right-of-way monument found, the PC of a curve to the left with a radius of 560.87 feet, delta of 290 52' 54", arc of 292.51 feet; thence a chord of S 690 11' 45" W 289.21 feet to a VDOT right-of-way monument found, the PT of said curve; thence S 570 30'29" W 19.14 feet to a 5/8 -inch iron rod found, comer to Edgar & Lottie B. Dickerson; thence leaving said right-of-way and along Dickerson N. 290 37' 52" W 107.48 feet to a Y2 -inch iron rod found; thence S 840 02' 11' W 445.25 feet to a Y.—inch iron rod found; thence S 470 19' 56" E 152.14 feet to a Y.—inch capped rebar set; thence S 541 11' 01" E 130.67 feet to a Y.—inch capped rebar set in the north right-of-way line of Interstate 81; thence S 690 58' 12" W 38.66 feet to a Y2 -inch capped rebar set; thence S 530 18' 07" W 8.39 feet to the point of beginning, containing 456.60 acres, more or less, and being a combination description of Tax Parcels #64.00-1-1, #54.00-1-2, and #54.00-1-3. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by this ordinance. On motion of Supervisor Harrison to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: /&� 01 Brenda J. Holto , CMC Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors cc: File Melinda Cox, Economic Development Specialist Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Terry Harrington, County Planner John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, APRIL 27, 1999 ORDINANCE 042799-11 AMENDING AND REENACTING VARIOUS SECTIONS OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE INCLUDING MULTIPLE EDITORIAL CHANGES AND SECTIONS PERTAINING TO AREAS INCLUDING COMPOSTING, CAMPS, RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY, CUSTOM MANUFACTURING, FAMILY DAY CARE HOMES, VINEYARDS, AND ZERO LOT LINE DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors adopted the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance on August 25, 1992; and WHEREAS, good zoning administration practice requires that zoning ordinances be periodically evaluated to insure their continued consistency with state law and their usefulness as a tool to implement community plans; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of Roanoke County evaluated the Roanoke County Zoning Ordinance during 1998 and has made a series of recommended changes to the ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of Roanoke County did hold its public hearing on these amendments on February 2, 1999, and made a recommendation concerning approval of the ordinance adopting these amendments to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia; and, WHEREAS, in the interest of public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice, the Board of Supervisors hereby amends certain provisions; and WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law, and that the first reading of this ordinance was held on March 23, 1999 and the second reading and public hearing will be held on April 27, 1999 BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that the Zoning Ordinance for Roanoke County, be, and hereby is, amended and reenacted, as follows: That the following general changes are made: a. That all Roanoke County zoning ordinance state code references to Title 15.1 be changed to reflect the corresponding Title 15.2 code reference. b. That all references to the Director of Planning be changed to the County Planner. C. That all references to the Director of Engineering and Inspections be changed to the Director of Community Development. d. That all references to the Department of Planning and Zoning, or the Department of Enizineeriniz and Inspections, be changed to the Department of CommunitX Development e. That all references to the PID1Planned Industrial District) be changed to PTD (Planned Technology District) f. That all references to the Comprehensive Plan be changed to the Community Plan 2. That the following specific additions, deletions and modifications are made: SEC. 30-3. PURPOSE, A. 9. Protect approach slopes and other safety areas of licensed airports,; 10.Protect surface and groundwater resources .. :..: ..:.:..: .:: .:,. .: .: :...:...: ..:: :.:...: ....: ....: ..::: ... A:. ::..;.:: .: ..: .:.:::.i. .:.: ': :::.}: ':.:..:..; •.}'{\:::..:.: iii:•.i:A: ;., ...:.::4iii:.ii:::: ilii: < n to the re fa d :per rua 1.0 afi abZ h s s ut ble ft r 1.00e. ...tnr es fir t 1+t�t a ve perp the purept a fut r : eds th pl 1 ...UX. alp y s to > SEC.30-6. ESTABLISHMENT OF DISTRICTS Industrial Districts PITD Planned Indust, ial Developin :J 0.._.SY.. District 2 Special Purpose Districts SEC. 30-22. PENALTIES (A) Any violation of any provision of this ordinance shall be a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of Sall .. un r not less than ten dollars ($10) nor more than one thousand i".. M. ... ' ... ...... ..sw .. ........... .. ............ dollars($t%6 IX's .0). Each day a violation exists shall constitute a separate offense. SEC. 30-23 , NONCONFORMING USES AND STRUCTURES; GENERALLY (A) Within the zoning districts established by this ordinance, or by future amendments which may elp e. .................. ................... P .4 pnil, eft 6 1 later be adopted,. � . .......... t. otherany ........... ............ . ... ... . ..... ........... ........... gczta.. ........ - ...... I here exist, or may exist lots, parcels, structures, uses of land and structures, and characteristics of site design and/or use which were lawful before this ordinance was adopted, or amended, but which would be prohibited under the terms of this ordinance, or future amendment. Such structures, uses, and characteristics, or any combination thereof, are considered nonconformities, and are hereby declared by the Board to be inconsistent with the character of the districts in which they occur. See. 30-23-2 Nonconforming Uses of Buildings, Structures or Land (F) This sepion ..... ..... "P.y. P P hid: t 6 3 ......................................... 0 ................. ... ................... ....................................... .... . .................. Sec. 30-29-2. Residential Use Types Kennel, Private: The keeping, breeding, raising, showing or training of three 3 or more dogs over fia ..... .) six (6) months of age for personal enjoyment of the owner or occupants of the property, ......... Q. and for which commercial gain is not the primary objective. Sec. 30-29-3 Civic Use Types An establishment that provides shelter and services which .... . . ...... Nursing Home - A use providing bed care and in-patient services for persons requiring regular medical attention but excluding a facility providing surgical or emergency medical services and excluding a facility providing care for alcoholism, drug addiction, mental disease, or yqI obbirsii -c. On .......... ".. communicable disease. se ......... ...... ... . .......... ............ See. 30-29-5. Commercial Use Types 4 Automobile Repair Services, Major: Repair of construction equipment, commercial trucks, agricultural implements and similar heavy equipment, including automobiles, where major engine s �and transmission repairs are conducted clu s xra ar..apt�.mpi ......repairs n oo un oil lcsr ;a�uomabe rprs. Typical uses include automobile and truck repair garages, transmission shops, radiator shops, body and fender shops, equipment service centers, machine shops, and similar uses where major repair activities are conducted. �I71ffiQ!•��r�•1111�1�U1•y/111Nl�IIIKIf I•LI��f.Yl•111 f. S1•l•/t•/fllll� l•LSfl�l�%t4�11•J �.7 NJ.t•J�NIIlIlK1�1 • �f l�J.t•/111J \•lK •/Ir.11l•L11�1LS�lKllli/!•IQ A7111.111{•1111��1111�11��I R•1711K 11111K 111�gr:R-01l•AlIlR.1K �%liK.7�•RIII1111� 0.1.11/1111 A7•f•.111•/1� IIN �1�1�%1�1K�7 i•L•//1./!•!•l�lll*7ty111 �•�LK�A7t•/�%N71iU w71 .................... Funeral Home ens: Establishments engaged in undertaking services such as preparing the dead for burial, and arranging and managing funerals. Typical uses include f tneral homes or mortuaries iMiremagnes. Sec. 30-29-6. Industrial Use Types pvstxng picas byyluch atnarass d Pmt d}scas ars ccmlized a�ac attrlated tq ............ ;ii< :: ...4:.::..::...x:..:.4:.:...:::. .. .: .:.:..: ..: ..: .. .1::::::::: .:::: ::.::::::::: .:: .: :.::.: ::.:� .: :.: •. .�::::::::-. ':::::::::: .:::::::: :.: :.::::::::::: .::. .:::::: utten::<c� ....,: >: �.::, :..:..:.;;.:> ..: ,. «..::. mpsg dcs� rnht the processg Omupespal wasle< SEC. 30-32. AG -3 AGRICULTURAL/RURAL PRESERVE DISTRICT Sec. 30-32-2 Permitted Uses. (A) 3. Civic Uses E>x 5 (B) 2. Civic Uses .................... .................... Cam s. ......::::.F..... 4. Industrial Uses SEC. 30-33. AG -1 AGRICULTURAL/RURAL LOW DENSITY DISTRICT Sec. 30-33-2 Permitted Uses. (A) 3. Civic Uses (B) 2. Civic Uses 4. Industrial Uses SEC. 30-34. AR AGRICULTURAL/RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Sec. 30-34-2 Permitted Uses. BE 4. Industrial Uses SEC. 30-36. AVVII,LAGE CENTER DISTRICT on (A) The purpose of the AV,ca]lVillage Center district is to establish areas which will serve as the focal point for cultural and commercial activity of the rural service areas of the County, as envisioned in the Comprehensive plan land use category of the same name. The density recommended for these areas is intended to average between one and three units per acre. Small country stores, family restaurants, and similar small service and personal service businesses, in addition to public and institutional buildings such as schools, post offices and places of religious assembly, are commonly found at these crossroad locations. These areas bring a sense of community to the surrounding rural areas, with an emphasis on providing the essential goods and services to rural residents, but are not intended as employment destinations for urban residents. New development should therefore be carefully considered for its compatibility with the surrounding development and the purpose and intent of this district. Any expansion of these areas should be contiguous to existing Village Center areas to avoid leap -frog commercial development. Similarly additional development may warrant additional public services, such as community sewer and water systems Sec. 30-36-2 Permitted Uses. A) 3. Civic Uses Sec. 30-41. R-1 Low Density Residential District 7 SEC. 30-42. R-2 MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT SEC. 30-45. R-3 MEDIUM DENSITY MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT SEC. 30-47. PRD PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT See. 30-47-3. Site Development Regulations (A) Each planned residential development shall be subject to the following development standards. 1. sere .................... ..................... SEC. 30-53. C-1 OFFICE DISTRICT See. 30-53-3 Permitted Uses. (A) 2. Civic Uses Religious Assembly* 4. Commercial Uses C--iinic (B) 1. Civic Uses �telig��� sembly�` SEC. 30-54. C-2 GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT See. 30-54-2 Permitted Uses. (A) 9 SEC. 30-611-1 INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT Sec. 30-61-2. Permitted Uses. W 21ndustrial Uses SEC. 30-62 I-2 INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT Sec. 30-62-2. Permitted Uses. (A) (B) 4. Commercial Uses Equipment Sales and Se, vie t l 10 SEC. 30-73 ECO EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS OVERLAY DISTRICT Sec. 30-73-5. Permits (A) Any application for a building permit for construction on any property located within an Emergency Communications Zone shall be referred to the tecinficai services officer ......................................,,,,, of the fire and rescue department. Sec. 30-73-6 Appeals (A) Any decision of the tecirical sei vices officLnactQ.<<'<:>::>;:::< ns:+Colsz0afor.. with regards to the requirements of this section shall be considered a decision of the administrator, and may be appealed to the board of zoning appeals pursuant to the provisions of this ordinance. Sec. 30-81-1. Agriculture Co .:g shops and restaurants assoca#d tthtculturem peratrs lie all©ved c>plyype�eia'soerrm Sec. 30-82-11 Multi -Family Dwelling. (B) General Standards m heatere#cutarres:±;titt>u''r::;r``:'.:>:>.:.:>:�<:,.: :..... .... . ched le (F) General Standards in the C-1 <- districts independent of the general standards above: Sec. 30-82-12 Single Family, Detached (Zero Lot Line Option) 11 OVA 2. The minimum lot size, frontage and front and rear yard setbacks required in the District tot n is > .. - f Tile 11011"affiont, tem,, mid side ymd setback i itist be maintained adjaren"o-� 6- �� windows, doors, or othm openhTs slIaH be pennitted in the wall of a baHding wifich faces Sec. 30-82-13. Single family, Attached The minimum lot size, frontage and front and rear yard setbacks required in the 12 Cher. dsxgnated farZe.Qt Jane use Sec. 30-82-14. Townhouses >.: Pravzstans must be xni� forehaatcss ani fiarp ar©und fobgvvJay sceulf P ...leo y Bchs trash cvhiflp SEC. 30-83 CIVIC USES Sec. 30-83-0.5 Camps (A) General standards: 1. Any outdoor activity area, swimming pool, or ball field or court which adjoins a residential use type shall be landscaped with one row of small evergreen trees in accordance with Section 30-92 along the property line adjoining the residential use type. Where night-time lighting of such areas is proposed large evergreen trees shall be required in a location appropriate to screen adjoining residences. 2.. The minimum area for a camp shall be 10 acres. i �. Multiple structures may be constructed on the property, such as cabins, lodges and other 13 facilities typical of a camp provided that all structures comply with the setback requirements for a principal structure from adjoining property lines. Each building intended to accommodate members shall be accessible via an all weather road suitable to accommodate emergency vehicles serving the property. One year-round residence, including a Manufactured Home, may be constructed as a caretakers home in addition to other facilities on the property. Sec. 30-83-9. Religious Assembly. (C) a. The total gross floor area of the expansion itself does not exceed square feet; and b. The gross floor area of the expansion is not more than one7htm-dred percent of the existing gross floor area; and Nq"MIV-tW! is I L./1:111 14 SEC. 30-86. INDUSTRIAL USES Sec. 30-86-3. Custom Manufacturing (B) Additional standards in the AG -3, AG -1',..,. and AV districts: Maximum square footage for a Custom manufacturing establishment: three & thousand 15 square feet. (C) Additional standards in the AG -3, AG -1 and A* -*R-' districts: Sec. 30-87-.05. Amateur Radio Tower. (C) 1. The maximum height permitted by right for an amateur radio tower shall be sixty �- WOW% (6,5'.) feet. Any tower that exceeds this height may be permitted only after obtaining a special use permit in accordance with Section 30-19 of this ordinance and the additional criteria established under (D) for such permits below. Sec. 30-90-4 Minimum Standards and Improvements Required .............. PWI: ...e. .. .. Q.J .. ..... . .. sdu 6 'W a .. .......... &h W :... . Hit ., h. . ..... Sec. 30-91-2. General regulations for Parking. 1. Except for vehicles parked within multi -family developments all recreational vehicles, boats, and utility trailers shall be parked ......... ehind the front building line, unless space is provided in a completely enclosed garage or other building. Tn., =3 16 2. No truck or commercial vehicle with, or designed to have, more than two (2) rear wheels shall be parked overnight; except while loading or unloading on such premises. No construction machinery shall be parked overnight unless the machinery is incidental to improving the premises. These provisions shall not apply to pickup body type trucks, or to vehicles essential for an agricultural use associated with the premises. Sec. 30-91-9. Minimum Parking Required. USE TYPE (C) Civic Use Types ;amps (E) Commercial Use Types Automobile Repair Services, Minor PARKING REQUIRED Sec. 30-91-10. Stacking Spaces and Drive -Through Facilities. (A) 17 3. That this ordinance shall be effective from and after its adoption. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Minnix, Harrison, Nickens, Johnson NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Holt n, CMC Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors 18 cc: File Terry Harrington, County Planner Circuit Court Roy B. Willett, Judge Clifford R. Weckstem, Judge Diane McQ. Strickland, Judge Richard C. Pattisall, Judge Robert P. Doherty, Jr., Judge Jonathan M. Apgar, Judge Steven A. McGraw, Clerk Juvenile Domestic Relations District Court Joseph M. Clarke, U, Judge Philip Trompeter, Judge John B. Ferguson, Judge Joseph P. Bounds, Judge Ruth P. Bates, Clerk Intake Counsellor General District Court George W. Harris, Judge William Broadhurst, Judge Vincent Lilley, Judge Julian H. Raney, Judge Jacqueline F. Ward Talevi, Judge Theresa A. Childress, Clerk Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Magistrates Sherri Krantz/Betty Perry Main Library Ray Lavinder, Police Chief Richard Burch, Chief of Fire & Rescue Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke 24016 Roanoke County Law Library, Singleton Osterhoudt Roanoke County Code Book Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator Don C. Myers, Assistant County Administrator Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance O. Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Gary Robertson, Director, Utility Michael Lazzuri, Court Services William J. Rand, III, Director, General Services Thomas S. Haislip, Director, Parks & Recreation Elaine Carver, Director, Procurement John W. Birckhead, Director, Real Estate Assessment 19 Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer R Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue