HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/23/2001 - Adopted Board RecordsAT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 2001
RESOLUTION 102301-1 EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY UPON THE
RETIREMENT OF HENRY A. WILEY, GENERAL SERVICES
DEPARTMENT, AFTER TWENTY-EIGHT YEARS OF SERVICE
WHEREAS, Henry A. Wiley was first employed by Roanoke County on September
14, 1973, in the General Services Department as Janitor I and also held the position of
Janitor II; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Wiley retired from Roanoke County on October 1, 2001 as
Custodian after twenty-eight years of service; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Wiley was particularly helpful in assuring that the Board Meeting
Room was clean and organized, and could always be counted on to assist with any official
or special County functions; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Wiley performed his duties and responsibilities in an efficient and
effective manner and was held in high regard by his fellow County employees; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Wiley, through his employment with Roanoke County, has been
instrumental in improving the quality of life for its citizens.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County expresses its deepest appreciation, the appreciation of Mr. Wiley's fellow County
employees, and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke County to HENRY A. WILEY
for over twenty-eight years of cheerful, capable, loyal and dedicated service to Roanoke
County.
FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy,
restful, and productive retirement.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Brenda J. Ho on, CMC
Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Anne Marie Green, Director, General Services
Joe Sgroi, Director, Human Resources
2
A-102301-2
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. '1�
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: October 23, 2001
AGENDA ITEM: Approval of an Agreement with the Town of Vinton Concerning the
Development of the McDonald Farm Economic Development Project
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOWS COMMENTS:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
This Agreement with the Town of Vinton will promote and encourage economic
development in that area of Roanoke County east of the Town through the joint funding of public
infrastructure improvements in the McDonald Farm economic development Project (the "Project")
to provide for increased employment and corporate investment in Roanoke County. This action
approves this Agreement and authorizes the County Administrator to execute this agreement on
behalf of Roanoke County.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
On November 2, 1999, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County and the Town Council
of the Town of Vinton entered into a Gain Sharing Agreement to address the mutual concerns of
each jurisdiction, to promote strong and viable units of local government, and to encourage
economic growth and development. On June 26, 2000, a special court entered a Final Order
validating and affirming the Gain Sharing Agreement.
Section 4 of said Agreement addresses joint public improvements and economic
development, and specifically, Section 4.03 addresses the McDonald Farm economic development
project. The County and the Town have agreed to negotiate the future joint funding of the costs of
this project. This Agreement provides for the County to make future appropriations to fund the
costs of development for this Project.
The Town and the County shall jointly agree to utilize the funds identified in the Agreement
to commence construction ofpublic infrastructure improvements on orbenefitting the property. The
funds shall not be expended unless both the Town and the County agree to such expenditure.
�-2
The Town Manager has previously briefed the Board in work session concerning the plans
for this Project. The Town Council will act on this Agreement in early November.
FISCAL IMPACTS:
aoc0
On December 19,+999 the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County appropriated $500,000
to begin to pay the County's share of the costs of development. It is anticipated that future
appropriations will be required to complete this Project.
Any New Tax Revenues (as defined in the Gain Sharing Agreement) shall be distributed in
accordance with the provisions of Section 4.03 of the Gain Sharing Agreement.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors authorize the County Administrator to
execute the Agreement on behalf of the County, upon form approved by the County Attorney.
Respect -fully sub itted,
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
ACTION VOTE
No Yes Abs
Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens to approve Church _ x _
Denied () staff recommendation Johnson _ x _
Received () McNamara_ x _
Referred () Minnix _ x _
To () Nickens _ x
cc: File
Doug Chittum, Director, Economic Development
Danial Morris, Director, Finance
Diane D. Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
G:\ATTORNEY\PMM\VINTON\VintonMcdonFamiAgree.rpt.wpd
9/28/01
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this
day of ,
2001, by and between the TOWN OF VINTON, VIRGINIA, a municipal corporation of the
Commonwealth of Virginia (the "Town"), and the COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA, a
political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia (the "County")
WHEREAS, on November 2, 1999, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County and the
Town Council of the Town of Vinton entered into a Gain Sharing Agreement to address the
mutual concerns of each jurisdiction, to promote strong and viable units of local government,
and to encourage economic growth and development; and
WHEREAS, on June 26, 2000, a special court entered a Final Order validating and
affirming said Gain Sharing Agreement; and
WHEREAS, Section 4 of said Agreement addresses joint public improvements and
economic development, and specifically, Section 4.03 addresses the McDonald Farm
economic development project (the "Project"); and
WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to negotiate the future joint funding of the costs of
this project.
IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, the
parties hereby agree as follows:
1. The Town and the County agree that the value of the McDonald Farm (the
"Property") is One Million Five Hundred Thousand ($1,500,000).
,1 000
2. On December 19, t999, the Board of Supervisors appropriated $500,000 for this
Project (Action No.
). This appropriation of funds by the County shall be
used for those purposes described in paragraph 3.
1
3. The "costs of development" shall mean all local funds expended by the County
and the Town and any in-kind donations by the County and the Town for the development of
the Project including, but not limited to, land acquisition, site development, water and sewer
facilities, other public improvements, and planning, engineering, architectural and marketing
services related directly to the Project. Any state or federal funding, or any other grant funds,
contributed by the County or the Town and the time and expenses of County and Town
personnel shall be excluded from the Costs of Development.
4. Additional funding in future budgets is subject to future appropriations by the
Board of Supervisors and Town Council.
5. The Town and the County shall jointly agree to utilize the funds identified in
paragraph 2 to commence construction of public infrastructure improvements on or
benefiting the property. The funds identified in paragraph 2 shall not be expended unless
both the Town and the County agree to such expenditure.
6. The parties acknowledge that prospects that intend to locate in this Project
may require unique or specific public improvements or other incentives. Both the Town and
the County shall agree to meet and confer in advance before any such improvements or
incentives are constructed, installed or provided. Specific improvements required by or
incentives granted to an economic development prospect or candidate for location in the
Project may be credited to the County's share of the initial value of the Property or portion of
development costs of the project. The parties agree to jointly market and promote the
Project and the Property. The parties agree to establish the value of the land for marketing
the property. Nothing herein shall prohibit the Town from offering as an incentive land or
other public improvements when developing marketing proposals for economic development
prospects.
2
C�
7. (a) Until the County's financial participation in this Project matches the Town's
financial participation, any conveyance of any interest in real estate or improvements on the
Property either by sale, exchange, lease, or dedication may occur only after consultation with
the County.
(b) Upon the future appropriation of additional funds by the County, so that its financial
participation in this Project is equivalent to that of the Town's (based upon value of the
Property, costs of development, and any incentives for economic development prospects
locating in the Project), any conveyance of any interest in real estate or improvements on the
Property, either by sale, exchange, lease or dedication shall occur only upon the mutual
written consent of the Town and the County.
8. Any New Tax Revenues (as defined in the Gain Sharing Agreement) shall be
distributed in accordance with the provisions of Section 4.03 of the Gain Sharing Agreement.
9. The provisions of this Agreement shall continue in perpetuity.
10. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Town
and the County, and each of the future governing bodies of the Town and the County, and
upon any successor to either the Town or the County.
Attest:
WITNESS the following signatures and seals.
Clerk
TOWN OF VINTON, VIRGINIA
Lo
Mayor
3
Attest:
Clerk
COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA
By
Chairman, Board of Supervisors
A-102301-3
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: October 23, 2001
AGENDA ITEM: Approval of a Performance Agreement with Sims Automotive, Inc.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
Recommend approval. There was a meeting of Sims and County representatives with the Clearbrook
Civic League last week to explain these changes to the community, and they were well received. This
project originally included only the Land Rover dealership. This is replacement of that project and
includes several premier dealerships for Land Rover, Mercedes Benz, and Jaguar. This a great
project which will require no new outlay of funds and I recommend approval.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
This Performance Agreement with Sims Automotive, Inc. will promote and encourage
economic development in the Clearbrook/U.S. Route 220 area of Roanoke County through the
recruitment of new retail business to provide for increased employment and corporate investment
in Roanoke County. Significant new revenues will be realized as a result of this development. This
action approves this Performance Agreement and authorizes the County Administrator to execute
this agreement on behalf of Roanoke County.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
This Performance Agreement provides for the appropriation of $3000,000 from new local
tax revenues generated by Sims Automotive, Inc. The County will release utility liens and pay off-
site facilities fees for this project.
Sims will develop a 4.66 -acre parcel located State Route 220 in the Clearbrook area (Tax
Parcel Nos. 88.03-1-30, 88.03-1-31, 88.03-1-32, 88.03-1-33, and 88.03-1-34 ) with an investment
of $7 Million in buildings and other site improvements, and it is estimated that this project will
generate $300,000 in new local tax revenues over any three years within the January 2002 - August
2007 period for Roanoke County. Sims will construct new automobile dealerships for Mercedes-
Benz, Jaguar and Land Rover.
If the project fails to generate the anticipated new local tax revenues within the time period
specified, then Sims shall reimburse the County the difference between the amount of new local tax
revenues actually produced and $300,000.
G:\ATTORNEY\PMM\ECONDEV\LandRover\LandRoverSimsPerfAgree.rpt.frm 1
FISCAL IMPACTS:
By Ordinance 121900-13, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County created a utility
improvement district in the Clearbrook area of Roanoke County known as the "Stable Road Water
and Sewer District" and imposed fees or liens on various properties in this district for the
construction of water and sewer lines and appurtenant facilities. In order to accomplish this
Performance Agreement the County must appropriate an amount from the General Fund to the Utility
Fund in order to release the water and sewer liens and to pay utility off-site facilities fees for this
project. The County will subordinate and then release its liens on the real estate in this project upon
the completion of the project and receipt of new local tax revenues. These appropriations should
be made in future budget appropriations from the new local tax revenues generated by this project.
It is anticipated that the County will recover its project investment from 3 years of anticipated
new local tax revenues derived from this project within the January 2002 - August 2007 period.
Sims will pay the County $25,000 within 30 days of the execution of the Performance
Agreement in order to pay its share of the utility connection fees and a portion of the utility liens.
Sims will donate land for construction of public highway for a redesigned Buck Mountain Road, the
location of which must be agreed to by Sims, the County, and VDOT.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors authorize the County Administrator to
execute the Performance Agreement on behalf of the County, by and between the Roanoke County
Board of Supervisors and Sims Automotive, Inc., upon form approved by the County Attorney. The
County Administrator is authorized to execute this Performance Agreement upon Sim's accepting
title to the real estate.
Respectfully submitted,
E. Douglas Chittum
Director of Economic Development
Approved (x)
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred ( )
To ( )
Approved by,
Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator
ACTION
Motion by: H. Odell Minnix to approve Church
staff recommendation Johnson
cc: File
Doug Chittum, Director, Economic Development
Danial Morris, Director, Finance
Diane D. Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer
Paul M Mahoney, County Attorney
VOTE
No Yes Abs
McNamara_ x
Minnix _ x _
Nickens x
2
This Performance Agreement (this "Agreement") made and entered into this
_ day of , 2001, by and between the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, (hereinafter referred to as "County'; PETTY,
LIVINGSTON DAWSON & RICHARDS, P. C., a Virginia professional corporation
(hereinafter referred to as 'Qualified Intermediary'D, and SIMS AUTOMOTIVE, INC., a
Virginia corporation, (hereinafter referred to as "Sims')
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County desires to promote and
encourage the economic development and vitality of Roanoke County and the Roanoke
Valley through the recruitment of new commercial enterprises and the expansion of
existing business and employment opportunities for the citizens of the Roanoke Valley,
in order to provide for increased employment and corporate investment in Roanoke
County; and
WHEREAS, Sims desires to support the economic development efforts of the
County, and in some cases for a certain period of time through its qualified
intermediary (as such term is defined in Treasury Regulations Section 1.1031(k) -1(g)),
Petty Livingston, Dawson, & Richards, P. C., anticipates constructing several automotive
dealerships, including Land Rover, Mercedes-Benz, and Jaguar, in the Clearbrook area
of Roanoke County (hereinafter referred to as the "Project"'); and
Performance Agreement_E&WRevised.doc 1
WHEREAS, by Ordinance 121900-13, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County created a utility improvement district in the Clearbrook area of Roanoke County
known as the "Stable Road Water and Sewer District" and imposed fees or liens on
various properties in this district for the construction of water and sewer lines and
appurtenant facilities; and
WHEREAS, the proposed Project is located in this utility improvement district,
and is subject to the fees or liens imposed, said fees or liens to be a lien recorded
among the land records in the Roanoke County Circuit Court Clerk's Office, and which
fees or liens are due upon the development of the property; andNOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the premises and the covenants and obligations herein contained,
which the parties hereto acknowledge as being sufficient consideration for entering into
this Agreement, the parties covenant and agree as follows:
1. Qualified Intermediary agrees to pay $25,000 towards the total cost for
utility construction of $86,308 as satisfaction of the development requirement set out in
Ordinance 121900-13 for Tax Parcel No. 88.03-1-33 (Tax Parcel Nos. 88.03-1-30,
88.03-1-31, 88.03-1-32, 88.03-1-33, and 88.03-1-34 having been combined into 88.03-
1-33) and as further stated in the Public -Private Partnership letter agreement dated
February 29, 2001, from Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator for Roanoke County, to
James R. Walker, President, Land Rover of Roanoke, Inc. (Exhibit A). This $25,000
payment shall be paid to the County within 30 days of the execution of this Agreement.
Performance Agreement_E&WRevised.doc 2
�-3
The lien imposed on Tax Parcel No. 88.03-1-33 by Ordinance 121900-13 shall be
released upon payment of said $25,000.
2. Sims and Qualified Intermediary agree to create a $7,000,000 investment
in real estate and business personal property and to create new full-time jobs.
Sims promises that this Project will generate no less than $300,000 in local tax
revenues for the County during any 3 years commencing January 1, 2002 and ending
August 31, 2007.
3. The County agrees to subordinate the lien imposed by Ordinance 121900-
13 (Deed Book 1688, page 1064) to a deed of trust (or replacement deed of trust) by
Sims for Tax Parcel Nos. 88.03-1-29, 88.03-1-33, and 88.03-1-35 to acquire this real
estate and construct the necessary improvements thereon for successful completion of
the Project.4.The County agrees to release the liens of record as being satisfied, which
are located in Deed Book 1688 at page 1064 in the Roanoke County Circuit Court
Clerk's Office, imposed by Ordinance 121900-13 on Tax Parcel Nos. 88.03-1-29, 88.03-
1-33, and 88.03-1-35 in the amount of $126,383 for sewer improvements and $80,850
for water improvements (total $207,233) upon the completion of the Project and the
generation of the new local tax revenues within the time period specified in paragraph
2.
5. County agrees to pay water and sewer off-site facilities fees portion of the
utility connection fees in an amount not to exceed $92,767, as authorized by Sections
Performance Agreement_E&WRevised.doc 3
18-168(f)(2) and 22-82(b)(3)b of the Roanoke County Code. Qualified Intermediary
shall be responsible for the payment of the basic connection fee.
6. Qualified Intermediary agrees to donate a 100 -foot wide right-of-way for
the construction of a public highway connecting a redesigned Buck Mountain Road and
Stable Road. The location of this redesigned Buck Mountain Road on Sims' property
shall be agreed upon by Sims, the County, and the Commonwealth of Virginia, Virginia
Department of Transportation.
7. This Performance Agreement is contingent upon Qualified Intermediary
acquiring fee simple title to the property identified as Tax Parcel Nos. 88.03-1-29,
88.03-1-33, and 88.03-1-35 no later than December 1, 2001.
8. If Sims or Qualified Intermediary, as the case may be, fails to fulfill the
promises with respect to new investment or new local tax revenues made to the County
in paragraphs 1 and 2, then Sims shall pay to the County the difference between
$300,000 and the greatest amount of local tax revenues received by the County from
the project during the applicable 3 -year period by September 30, 2007.
9. Sims and/or Qualified Intermediary shall have the right to assign this
Agreement to a separate entity provided, however, that except as set forth in
paragraph 12 hereinbelow, any such assignment shall not relieve the assignor of its
obligations herein.
10. This Agreement shall be governed by any and all disputes related hereto
shall be determined in accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia.11.
Performance Agreement E&WRevised.doc 4
This Agreement and any reimbursement of costs and improvements from public
funds is subject to future appropriations by the Board of Supervisors. The Board of
Supervisors hereby appropriates the sum of $300,000 from the General Fund to
reimburse the Utility Fund for the release of liens in paragraph 1 and 4 and the
payment of water and sewer off-site facilities fees portion of the utility connection fees
in paragraph 5.
12. The parties hereto acknowledge that Qualified Intermediary is acting
solely as a qualified intermediary in an IRC §1031 like -kind exchange involving Sims.
The parties hereto further agree and acknowledge that on or before, but in no event
later than December 22, 2001, the Qualified Intermediary will transfer and assign to
Sims all of its ownership, title, interest, obligations, and rights in and to of any portion
of the Project that it owns as of the date hereof, including, without limitation, (a) fee
simple title to any real estate now owned by the Qualified Intermediary and included in
the Project, and (b) all of Qualified Intermediary's rights and obligations under this
Performance Agreement, so that Qualified Intermediary will no longer have the
authority or assets available to continue to be obligated under the Agreement.
Moreover, all of the parties agree that that Sims is to be substituted in place and stead
of Qualified Intermediary under this Performance Agreement on or before December
22, 2001, and shall be solely responsible for performance of the same at all times
thereafter. Accordingly, the parties hereto agree that upon the transfer of the Project
to Sims (which shall occur on or before December 22, 2001) Sims shall be, and by its
Performance Agreement_E&WRevised.doc 5
signature hereto agrees to be, substituted in place of the `Qualified Intermediary"
under the Agreement and Petty, Livingston, Dawson & Richards, P. C. shall thereafter
be relieved of and from any further obligation under this Performance Agreement from
and after that date.
Approved as to form:
Roanoke County Attorney
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator
SIMS AUTOMOTIVE, INC.
PETTY LIVINGSTON DAWSON
& RICHARDS, P. C.
Its
Performance Agreement_E&WRevised.doc 6
A-102301-4
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO. .
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER
MEETING DATE: October 23, 2001
AGENDA ITEM: APPROVAL AND AUTHORIZATION OF THE EXECUTION OF AN
OPTION FOR THE ACQUISITION OF APPROXIMATELY 89 ACRES
OF REAL ESTATE ON READ MOUNTAIN FOR RIDGE LINE
PROTECTION
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
There may be questions on why this mountain was selected and not others
around Roanoke County. This mountain is significant because it remains
untouched and has beautiful outcroppings of rocks and can be used as a
different type of greenway. This option will be in place for 120 days at no
cost to the County. If approved, we will also assist citizen groups seeking
donations and grants.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
This action authorizes the execution of an option for the acquisition of
approximately 89 acres of real estate on Read Mountain, in order to protect and preserve
a portion of this environmentally -significant ridge line and view shed.
BACKGROUND:
Over the past several years the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors has taken
several significant steps to protect and preserve environmentally -significant locations in
the Roanoke Valley. These steps include view shed protection along the Blue Ridge
Parkway, the commencement of construction of the first multi -jurisdictional green way in
the Roanoke Valley (Hanging Rock), support for the establishment of the Roanoke Valley
Green way Commission, the purchase of 34 acres on Green Ridge, and initial steps for the
creation of planning mechanisms within the Comprehensive Plan for the protection of
ridge lines.
Roanoke County now has the opportunity to acquire approximately 89 acres located
G:\BOARD\2001\Oct23\10-23readmountain.doc 1
{
on Read Mountain to protect and preserve an environmentally -significant ridge line and
view shed.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
This action approves and authorizes the execution of an option for the acquisition
of Tax Map Parcel Number 39.00-1-8, consisting of approximately 89 acres of real estate.
This option agreement is for six months. During this six month option period the County
will work with interested citizens and charitable organizations to raise the necessary funds
and donations to acquire this property. If the various conditions can be satisfied within
the option period, this matter will be brought back to the Board for the adoption of an
ordinance authorizing the exercise of the option and acquisition of this real estate.
Attached to this Board report is a copy of the "Roanoke County Board of
Supervisors Guidelines for Acquiring Environmentally -Sensitive Property" which was
adopted by the Board on May 27,1997. These Policy Guidelines were intended to provide
direction to the Board and to the public in the acceptance and use of acquisition of
environmentally -sensitive properties in the County. These guidelines will assist the Board
in evaluating each proposal with respect to conservation goals and stewardship abilities.
It is anticipated that this acquisition of real estate can be accomplished for the sum
of $200,000. The option fee is $100.00
In addition the Board must have a Phase I environmental audit completed for this
property; a baseline documentation report (to determine the conservation value of the
property and to document key resources on the property); survey; title examination and
title insurance; and review by the Planning Commission for conformity with the
Comprehensive Plan in accordance with Section 15.2-2232 of the State Code.
In addition the Board should authorize the County Administrator to execute an
agreement with the Seller to limit the future use of this real estate to ridge line and view
shed protection; limited, passive, recreational use (hiking trails); and preventing any future
high intensity uses or development.
FISCAL IMPACTS:
The purchase price of $200,000 will be subject to future appropriations. Ancillary
costs and expenses described above should not exceed $5,000; and these expenses should
be appropriated from the Board's Contingency Fund.
ALTERNATIVES:
G:\BOARD\2001\Oct23\10-23readmountain.doc 2
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Board favorably consider:
(1) authorizing the County Administrator to execute this option agreement for
the acquisition of this real estate, and approve the payment of the $100.00
option fee; and
(2) the appropriation of $5,000.00 from the Board's contingency fund for related
expenses.
Respectfully submitted,
Janet Scheid
Senior Planner
Approve by,
Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator
--------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
No Yes Abs
Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson to approve Church _ x _
Denied ( ) staff recommendation Johnson _ x _
Received ( ) McNamara_ x _
Referred ( ) Minnix _ x _
To () Nickens x
cc: File
Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development
Janet Scheid, Chief Planner
Danial Morris, Director, Finance
Diane D. Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer
Paul M .Mahoney, County Attorney
G:\BOARD\2001\Oct23\10-23readmountain.doc 3
ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
GUIDELINES FOR ACQUIRING ENVIRONMENTALLY -SENSITIVE PROPERTY
BACKGROUND
From time -to -time, the County may be approached with a proposal for the donation of money, or the
direct transfer of real estate, or the granting of an easement, for the purpose of protecting view sheds,
establishing green way corridors, or for the acquisition of other environmentally -sensitive areas in the
County. In response to these potential donations, the Board of Supervisors has adopted the following
guidelines for the acceptance and use of such donations. These guidelines are intended to provide
direction to the Board and to the public, but are not to be considered as regulations. Circumstances
may warrant departure from these guidelines in specific cases.
Roanoke County takes its stewardship role seriously. When the County accepts environmentally
sensitive property through donation it has made a significant commitment to protect that property in
perpetuity. Consequently, the Board must carefully evaluate each proposal with respect to the
County's conservation goals and stewardship abilities.
GUIDELINES
The following guidelines are to be considered by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors in
evaluating proposals for donations intended to protect or establish environmentally -sensitive areas
in the County. These guidelines shall apply to both the donation of money to acquire a particular
parcel of real estate and to the actual donation of real estate or easement.
The acquisition of the specific property shall benefit the public and shall conform with the
County's conservation goals. These goals are sufficiently broad to include a wide variety of
lands. The Board uses the following criteria to evaluate lands being considered for protection
by asking if the land has one or more of the following characteristics:
A. Does it include unique local scenic viewpoints or outstanding physiographic features
(for example, intact ridge lines, distinct outcroppings, waterfalls, bluffs) that help
define the character of our locale and enhance our community's sense of place?
B. Does it include lands that have the potential to be a part of a community or regional
green way system?
C. Does it include lands that have the potential to be part of a County, state or federal
part: system or contribute, due to proximity and visibility, to the protection of such
public lands?
D. Does it include lands of agricultural, forestry or scenic significance?
E. Does it include lands that are valuable as open space due to their proximity to
developing areas, their prominence in the perception of community identity or their
high scenic value?
F. Does it include wetlands, flood plains or other lands that are important to the
protection of water quality?
G. Does it include lands that contain endangered, threatened or rare species or natural
communities?
H. Does it include lands that are of historical or cultural value or are adjacent to sites of
historical or cultural value and will therefore, contribute to the protection of that
value?
2. The Board shall assess the total costs associated with acquiring and managing these
properties. These costs shall include:
A. Baseline Documentation Report - The costs associated with determining the
conservation value of the property and identifying and documenting key resources
of the property.
B. Stewardship - The costs associated with owning the property or easement.
C. Environmental Liability - The costs associated with determining that the property is
free of environmental liability or for correcting environmental deficiencies.
D. Enforcement - The costs of enforcing the terms of the donation or acquisition.
3. The Board shall direct the Planning Commission to review, identify and prioritize real estate
in the County deserving of protection and include and identify such properties in the County
Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map.
4. The Board, pursuant to Section 15.1-456 of the Code of Virginia, shall request Planning
Commission review and recommendation for any proposed acquisition or acceptance of real
estate or easement, to evaluate conformance with the Comprehensive Plan.
5. The Board shall review each proposal for the acquisition of environmentally sensitive real
estate and determine the appropriate level and extent of public use of such properties. In
making this determination the Board shall take into consideration the conservation value of
the property and the extent to which public use may enhance or threaten that value.
6. The Board shall determine what County department or other entity shall have long-term
stewardship responsibility for each property. In doing so, the Board shall give consideration
to the Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission, the Western Virginia Land Trust, the Virginia
Outdoors Foundation and other organizations where appropriate.
7. The Board shall consider appropriating monies as a lump sum or on an annual basis to the
department or entity identified in 96 above for the long-term stewardship costs of such
- �
r
properties.
8. The Board shall encourage donations of money or property from private individuals and
organizations, or from public entities, to further the objectives of these guidelines.
May 15, 1997
CACO MM OMIMAY27TAULOUiD. LAN
A-102301-5
ACTION NO.
ITEM NUMBER We
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: October 23, 2001
AGENDA ITEM: Request for Approval of Policies and Procedures for
Accepting Contributions and Donations for County
Projects
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
Following our discussion at the Work Session on improvements to Bent
Mountain Library, we have prepared these policies and procedures for your
approval. It is very likely that we will need to make changes to respond to
questions or suggestions you may have. Essentially this policy is intended
to encourage citizens to donate to County projects of their choice, and we
express our appreciation in advance to all who wish to do so. This policy will
work in concert with and not replace the CIP program, nor will contributions
affect the priority listing of any capital project. The policy is separate from the
matching grant program sponsored by the Department of Parks, Recreation
and Tourism. If the Board wishes to have a work session to incorporate your
suggestions, we will do so.
BACKGROUND:
During the work session with the Library Board on October 9,
2001 concerning the improvements to the Bent Mountain Library, the
Board of Supervisors discussed a need to establish policies and
procedures for the acceptance of contributions and donations to the
County or its departments and agencies. In the past, we have
accepted cash for specified items as well as operating
expenses (Alford Trust for the Vinton Library); we have accepted
real estate with and without conditions and restrictions (Ex.
Vinyard Park); and we have accepted other capital and property for
the use of the County or by one of our agencies (Ex. Vehicle for
use by the Mason Cove Fire Department).
The contributions or donations are not a substitute for proper
planning for capital or operations such as through the Capital
Improvements Program (CIP) or our normal operating budget process
nor do they replace programs such as the matching grants as
established through the Department of Parks, Recreation and
Tourism. These budgeting tools look at our needs and consider the
1
impact on a Countywide basis. We also need to be aware that some
communities or departments may be better able to solicit and
receive donations than other groups and the practice, if used to
fund major facilities or programs, could results in inequities in
the levels of service provided.
The attached policy establishes guidelines for accepting these
contributions and donations of major types of assets and prescribes
an accounting so that the intended purpose may be achieved. Before
items with restrictions are accepted, the Board of Supervisors
should receive recommendations from the impacted Department,
Advisory Boards and the County Administrator to determine the
impact of accepting such a gift. The County Attorney should also
determine if there are any other concerns such as discrimination
that should be considered. In instances where the gift would
result in a liability or hardship for the County, the
recommendation may be to not accept the gift.
In the case of cash or cash equivalent gifts, the Director of
Finance should establish an escrow account outlining any
restrictions for the donation(s), maintain an accounting of the
funds available, assure that receipts have been issued for the
donations, and when the monies are needed for expenditures, to
request an appropriation of these monies from the Board of
Supervisors to accomplish the purpose of the donation. Any cash
equivalents donated should be converted to cash as soon as possible
to minimize the accounting procedures. All cash items must be
appropriated before the expenditure can be made.
Donations of real estate should first have an environmental
audit performed to assure that we are not assuming a liability. We
should also examine any restrictions as to the impact to the County
and implications to on-going costs. Finally, we should look at the
impact to our tax base and how we plan to re -use the property.
Acceptance of such real property would require two readings of an
appropriate ordinance as required by our Charter.
Motor Vehicles that are donated should be looked at from the
standpoint of necessity and from the manner the vehicle is to be
used and the impact to our operating budgets. A determination must
be made as to whether the specified inventory of vehicles is to be
increased or if the vehicle is a replacement.
Other property may be donated and should be considered by the
Board of Supervisors before acceptance to assure that the donation
is in the best interest of Roanoke County. Equipment may have a
minimal cost associated with acceptance, but may become a
maintenance nightmare if parts are not readily available or if the
E
service is not compatible or available in the area.
This policy would become part of the County Policy and
Procedures and would be administered by the County Administrator or
designated staff. Donations and Contributions can obviously have
a positive effect on our cash management, but can present
accounting nightmares if projects are not clearly defined or when
de -minimus donations are received.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Adopt the attached policy which would outline the conditions
upon which assets donated or contributed to the County would
be handled.
2. Continue to consider the impact of donations and contributions
on an individual basis as they present themselves.
FISCAL IMPACT:
All cash donations must be appropriated before they can be
expended. Other assets must be accepted by the Board and should
receive the recommendation of the Department or Advisory Board
before the final determination is made.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends adoption of the attached policy.
Respectfully submitted, Apperovv d by, (�
John M. Chambliss, Jr. Elmer C. Hodge
Assistant Administrator County Administrator
-----------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (x)
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred ( )
To ( )
Motion by: Joseph McNamara to approve
policy with revision to IC to establish
$1,000 threshold
cc: File
John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator
Wanda Riley, Executive Secretary, Policy Manual
3
No Yes Abs
Church _ x _
Johnson _ x
McNamara_ x
Minnix _ x _
Nickens x
POLICY FOR THE ACCEPTANCE OF DONATIONS
PURPOSE:
To establish guidelines for the acceptance of donations of money and other property for public
use by Roanoke County.
POLICY
1. Money
A. Roanoke County may accept donations of money or cash equivalents from
citizens, corporations or other organizations for general County purposes
or for specified projects or expenditures.
B. Donations for general County purposes, unencumbered by any conditions
or restrictions are preferred.
C. Donations for specific purposes or with restrictions shall be deposited in
the General Fund in an escrow account established by the Director of
Finance and may be expended for general County purposes upon
appropriation by the Board of Supervisors. The minimum acceptable
donation of money or cash equivalents with restrictions shall be $1,000
before a unique escrow account may be established
D. Conditions, limitations or restrictions placed upon the donation of money
shall be reviewed by the County Attorney for compliance with County
ordinances and policies and compliance with United States and
Commonwealth laws and regulations with respect to nondiscrimination.
The County will not accept any donation that discriminates against any
person because of his/her race, religion, color, sex or national origin, age,
disability, or other basis prohibited by state or federal law.
E. Donations with restrictions or for specific purposes should be reviewed by
the Department Head, Advisory Boards and County Administrator to
determine the impact of the donation to operating budgets, the Capital
Improvements Plan, and equity in operations.
F. Donations of cash or cash equivalents to the County for general purposes
without any restrictions may be deposited into the General Fund of the
County. Should the County choose to use this for a specific purpose, an
appropriation by the Board of Supervisors is required.
2. Real Estate
A. Roanoke County may accept donations of real estate from citizens,
corporations or other organizations for general County purposes or for
special purposes.
B. Donations for general County purposes, unencumbered by any conditions
or restrictions are preferred.
C. Donations of real estate shall be reviewed by the appropriate County
department for recommendation as to suitability for particular County
purposes or needs, and for impact on the County tax base.
D. Environmental audits will be conducted for donated real estate to insure
that the County will not accept any real estate contaminated with
hazardous wastes, or substances that will cause substantial expense to
remediate.
E. The condition, state of repair and compliance with current building and
fire codes of any buildings or structures on the real estate shall be
reviewed to avoid any environmental hazards or any significant liabilities
arising from such conditions.
F. Conditions, limitations or restrictions placed upon the donation of real
estate shall be reviewed by the County Attorney for compliance with
County ordinances and policies and compliance with United States and
Commonwealth laws and regulations with respect to nondiscrimination.
The County will not accept any donation that discriminates against any
person because of his/her race, religion, color, sex or national origin, age,
disability, or other basis prohibited by state or federal law.
G. Donations with restrictions or for specific purposes should be reviewed by
the Department Head, Advisory Boards and County Administrator to
determine the impact of the donation to operating budgets, the Capital
Improvements Plan, and equity in operations.
3. Other Personal Property
A. Roanoke County may accept donations of personal property from citizens,
corporations or other organizations for general County purposes or for
specific uses.
B. Donations for general County purposes, unencumbered by any conditions
or restrictions are preferred.
N
C. Donations of personal property shall be reviewed by the appropriate
County department for recommendation as to suitability for particular
County purposes or needs.
D. Conditions, limitations or restrictions placed upon the donation of
personal property shall be reviewed by the County Attorney for
compliance with County ordinances and policies and compliance with
United States and Commonwealth laws and regulations with respect to
nondiscrimination. The County will not accept any donation that
discriminates against any person because of his/her race, religion, color,
sex or national origin, age, disability, or other basis prohibited by state or
federal law.
E. Donations of vehicles may require an increase in the authorized inventory
of our fleet unless the vehicle is replacing an existing item.
F. Donations with restrictions or for specific purposes should be reviewed by
the Department Head, Advisory Boards and County Administrator to
determine the impact of the donation to operating budgets, the Capital
Improvements Plan, and equity in operations.
4. Miscellaneous
A. Donations of any property with limitations or restrictions on its use shall
be reviewed by the receiving department, any impacted Advisory Board,
the County Administrator and the Board of Supervisors to determine
suitability for general County purposes, and to avoid undue administrative
burdens.
B. Acceptance of any donation shall not commit the County to additional
funding or obligations to operate or add any new programs, personnel or
facilities.
3
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 2001
ORDINANCE 102301-6 AUTHORIZING THE CREATION OF AND
FINANCING FORA LOCAL PUBLIC WORKS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT,
PAINT BANK ROAD WATER PROJECT
WHEREAS, Ordinance 112288-7 authorizes the financing of local public works
improvements and the imposition of special assessments upon abutting property owners
upon the adoption of an appropriate ordinance by the Board of Supervisors; and
WHEREAS, the County Administration has negotiated the extension of the public
water system to Paint Bank Road community; and
WHEREAS, the extension of the public water system and the creation of a special
utility (water) service area will alleviate a critical public health, and safety problem; and
WHEREAS, several of the residents have requested that the County allow them to
pay their portion of the costs of connection to the public sewer system over ten years at an
interest rate of 8%; and
WHEREAS, the first reading of this Ordinance was held on October 23, 2001, and
the second reading was waived because of the emergency nature of this request; and
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as
follows:
1. That pursuant to the authority of Ordinance 112288-7, the Board authorizes
and approves a local public works improvement project, namely, public water extgnsion for
the Paint Bank Road community. The total construction cost of this public water project is
estimated to be $36,550.00, to be initially financed as follows:
1
Citizen Participation (4 at $3,655 each)
$14,620
Advance from the Public Works
Participation Fund
$21,930
TOTAL
$36,550
That there is hereby appropriated for this project the sum of $21,930 from the Public
Works Participation Fund. Any citizen participation under paragraph 3. will be advanced
as a loan from the Water Fund.
2. That the "Project Service Area" is shown and designated on the attached plat
entitled "Paint Bank Road Water Petition Project" prepared by the Roanoke County Utility
Department, dated October 23, 2001. The Paint Bank Road Water Petition Project Area
is created for a period of ten (10) years. Any owner of real estate within this service area
may participate in and benefit from the public water extension to this service area by paying
at a minimum the sum of $5,000 ($3,655 toward construction costs, plus $1,345 toward the
off-site facility fee), said costs to be paid in full and in advance of connection to the public
water extension.
3. That the Board authorizes and approves the payment by the property owners
in the project service area who elect to participate on or before January 23, 2002, of their
portion of the cost of extending the public sewer system to their properties in accordance
with the following terms and conditions:
(a) The total amount per property owner/residential connection may be financed
for 10 years at an interest rate of 8% per annum. Down payment of $1,345.00 will be
applied to the off-site facility fee.
2
(b) Property owners agree to execute a promissory note or such other instrument
as the County may require to secure this installment debt.
(c) Property owners further agree to execute such lien document or instrument
as may be required by the County; said lien document or instrument to be recorded in the
Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County. This lien instrument or
document shall secure the repayment of the promissory note by the property owners to the
County and shall be a lien against the property of the owners. Property owners also agree
to pay the County any Clerk's fees or recordation costs which may be required to record
any lien instrument or documents in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court.
(d) Property owners who wish to participate after the January 23, 2002 deadline
(other than new property owners) shall pay a minimum of $7,076 ($4,386 construction
costs plus 20% plus $30 x length of road frontage in excess of 250 feet) plus the off-site
facility fee in effect at that time (currently $2,690).
4. That the payment by citizens in the project service area, in excess of the four
(4) anticipated in this ordinance, who elect to participate shall be made to the various funds
as follows: The off-site facility fee shall be returned to the Water Fund, and payment of the
construction costs shall be returned to the Public Works Participation Fund until such time
as the advance has been repaid; any further payment of construction costs shall be
returned to the Water Fund.
5. That the County Administrator is authorized to take such actions and execute
such documents as may be necessary to accomplish the purposes of this transaction, all
upon form approved by the County Attorney.
3
On motion of Supervisor Church to adopt the ordinance with the County funding the
Basic Construction Cost of $3,655.00 for the fifth property to achieve the 50% participation,
waive the second reading because of the emergency nature of the request, and carried by
the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
13"� n, /dej,4,
Brenda J. Hol n, CMC
Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Gary Robertson, Director, Utility
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
Danial Morris, Director, Finance
CI
PROPOSED SPECIAL WATER
SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY
#928
44.03-5-38
44.03-5-39.1
#912
44.03-5-39
#910
44.03-5-40
#892
44.03-5-43 #856
44.03-5-44 #850
44.03-5-45
#842
44.03-5-46
#834
44.03-5-47
#826
�y
#818
44.03-5-48
EXISTING 24" WATER LINE '
10075 50 25 0 100 200 300 400
. SCALE
END OF WATER LINE
�V
#863
44.03-5-41.1
44.03-5-41
#851
PROPOSED WATER LINE
PROPOSED SPECIAL WATER
SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY
PAINT BANK ROAD
WATER PETITION PROJECT
OCTOBER 23, 2001
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 2001
RESOLUTION 102301-7 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN
ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS
DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM J -CONSENT AGENDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as
follows:
1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for October
23, 2001, designated as Item J - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and
concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through
6, inclusive, as follows:
1. Confirmation of committee appointment to the Roanoke Valley Area
Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Community Advisory Committee.
2. Resolution of congratulations to Allstate Insurance Company on the occasion
of its 50th Anniversary in the Roanoke Valley.
3. Resolution of appreciation upon the retirement of Daniel A. LaPrade, Police
Department.
4. Request from Sheriff's Office to accept $8,115 grant for the Adult Literacy
and Basic Education Program.
5. Request for acceptance of Monet Drive into the Virginia Department of
Transportation Secondary System.
6. Acceptance of donation of 20' sanitary sewer easement from Professional
Coordinated Services, Inc. on Reservoir Road, Hollins Magisterial District.
2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by
law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item
pursuant to this resolution.
1
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Consent Resolution, and carried by
the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
g, ka:61�
Brenda J. H Iton, CMC
Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Gerald Holt, Sheriff
Danial Morris, Director, Finance
Vickie Huffman, Senior Assistant County Attorney
Gary Robertson, Director, Utility
Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development
2
A -102301-7.a
ACTION NO
ITEM NUMBER I- — ,
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: October 23, 2001
AGENDA ITEM: Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the Roanoke Valley
Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Community Advisory
Committee
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION
Roanoke Valley Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Community
Advisory Committee
At the October 9, 2001 meeting, Supervisor Nickens nominated Ann Rogers to serve on
this committee. There are no specific terms for this committee.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the above appointment be confirmed.
Submitted by: Approved by,
Mary H. Allen CMC Elmer C. odge
Clerk to the Board County Administrator
ACTION VOTE
No Yes Abs
Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson to approve Church _ x _
Denied () Johnson _ x _
Received () McNamara_ x
Referred O Minnix _ x _
To () Nickens _ x _
cc: File
Roanoke Valley Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Community Advisory
Committee File
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 2001
RESOLUTION 102301-7.b OF CONGRATULATIONS TO ALLSTATE
INSURANCE COMPANY ON THE OCCASION OF ITS 50TH
ANNIVERSARY IN THE ROANOKE VALLEY
WHEREAS, Allstate Insurance Company was founded in 1931 as part of Sears,
Roebuck and Company, being named after an automobile tire line that Sears carried at that
time; and
WHEREAS, the Allstate Insurance Company is celebrating its 70`h anniversary in the
United States, its 50th anniversary in the Roanoke Valley and its 31St anniversary in the
County of Roanoke; and
WHEREAS, Allstate Insurance Company is ranked the ninth largest employer in the
Roanoke Valley by the Chamber of Commerce, employing over 1,400 employees in
multiple County locations, including the National Support Centerwhich services customers
and agents countrywide; and
WHEREAS, Allstate Insurance Company, lives up to its slogan "You're in Good
Hands with Allstate," by service to the community through the Allstate Foundation
established in 1952 that awards grants to non-profit agencies seeking to improve the quality
of life and The Helping Hands Program which works with community groups to identify and
address their most pressing needs; and
WHEREAS, Allstate Insurance Company employees in the Roanoke Valley give of
their time and talent through volunteer involvement in Junior Achievement, the West End
Center, Boys and Girls Club, Meals on Wheels delivery, blood donor drives, and various
other charitable organizations.
1
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, offers its congratulations to Allstate Insurance Company on its 50th
anniversary in the Roanoke Valley; and
FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors expresses its deepest appreciation to Allstate
for its leadership role of service to the community and for providing employment to
residents of the Roanoke Valley.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix
NAYS: None
A COPY ATESTE:
�Yl.�Q.�C7'9) j /
-�'rGv-�
Brenda J. Hol on, CMC
Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Resolutions of Congratulations File
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 2001
RESOLUTION 102301-7.c EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY UPON THE
RETIREMENT OF DANIEL A. LAPRADE, POLICE DEPARTMENT,
AFTER TWENTY-EIGHT YEARS OF SERVICE
WHEREAS, Daniel A. LaPrade was first employed by Roanoke County on July 1,
1973, in the Sheriff's Office as a Deputy Sheriff, Traffic Bureau, and has also held the
positions of Deputy Sheriff in the Detective Bureau, Services Division, Youth & Family
Services, as well as Personnel Training Sergeant and Deputy Sheriff -Captain; and
WHEREAS, Captain LaPrade retired from Roanoke County on October 1, 2001 as
a Police Officer - Captain after twenty-eight years and three months of service; and
WHEREAS, Captain LaPrade excelled at administrative responsibilities for the
Police Department, especially concerning employment and Human Resources issues; and
WHEREAS, Captain LaPrade was instrumental in substantially increasing the funds
obtained by the Police Department over the last year through his most recent assignment
managing the proposals and processing of grant applications; and
WHEREAS, Captain LaPrade, through his employment with Roanoke County, has
been instrumental in improving the quality of life for its citizens.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the citizens of Roanoke
1
County to DANIEL A. LAPRADE for over twenty-eight years of capable, loyal and
dedicated service to Roanoke County.
FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a happy,
restful, and productive retirement.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
&g'kjA_
Brenda J. Holt n, CMC
Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Ray Lavinder, Chief of Police
Joe Sgroi, Director, Human Resources
2
ACTION NO. A-102301-7 .d
ITEM NO. "T-4—
AT—'
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER
MEETING DATE: October 23, 2001
AGENDA ITEM: Request to accept the Adult Literacy and Basic Education Program Grant
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: 4t'e7� 7ejt-A�
BACKGROUND: We have received grant funding approval from the State Department of
Education for the Adult Literacy and Basic Education/GED program operated by Roanoke City
Schools and administered by TAP - This Valley Works, under the auspices of the Roanoke
County/Salem Jail facility. The funding period will run from July 1, 2001 through June 30,
2002. The total funding is in the amount of $8,115.00. We will be required to provide matching
funds in the amount of $13,380.00, which will be supplied from the Sheriffs SubFund.
Acceptance of this grant will require no additional funding from the Board of Supervisors.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The grant was approved by faxed notification on October
02, 2001. The grant period is from July 1, 2001 through June 30, 2002. The total amount of the
grant is $8,115.00 in federal funds and requires matching funds in the amount of $13,380.00,
which will be supplied from the Sheriff s SubFund. No additional and/or matching funding from
the Board of Supervisors will be required.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ALTERNATIVES: None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the acceptance of the awarded funds.
Respectfully submitted,
lxl�-y A� �--
Gerald S. Holt
Sheriff
Approved by,
64-.1
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
No Yes Abs
Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson to approve Church _ x
Denied () Johnson _ x _
Received () McNamara_ x _
Referred () Minnix _ x
To () Nickens _ x _
cc: File
Gerald Holt, Sheriff
Danial Morris, Director, Finance
Faf
d
0
ate'
� etc 9�8 C H1no.;-nc3 Sxaorl ATI-IHn S I Hl ck4l tb : C T t 0 C' T
te
Lu
+�
�O�J
cu
C6
a
LFI
z
J
4
W
N
a
O
co
h
tl
O
%.D
dc
i
1
Q
I
d
v1
�
G
N
10,
cz
m
LL
m
9%
C,
cs
CO
N
0
N
e~e
0
a
w
(p
Q
O
O
ON
�
tb
N
M
I @ro
C:
w
H
w
m
C
W I
L
�'aU
►�
--q
v
a b
u u
N
Ni
4
C
Y � v
a wN as
N V
�
0
C
C p C C
c
d
b
r
� etc 9�8 C H1no.;-nc3 Sxaorl ATI-IHn S I Hl ck4l tb : C T t 0 C' T
i✓:'� 2:2001 10: 44 TAF THIS UALLEY WORKS EDU -YOUTH 4 33876293 NO. 166 PO4
Ll
LITERACY/ROANOKE COUNTY JAIL
INSTRUCTIONAL BUDGET WORKSHEET
2001-2002
Local
Elpenditure Cash Federall
Category Match State Total
1000
PERSONAL SERVICES
Instructor Specialist 1 aa$19.00x2Ox52 11,223
A/L Accrued.
2000
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
FICA
VUTA
FICA A/L
W.C.
Retirement
EAP
General Insurance
3000
PURCHASED SERVICES
4000
INTERNAL SERVICES
5000
OTHER CHARGES
Space Cost
Travel
Student Bus Passes
6000
MATERIALS & SUPPLIES
Office Supplies
Instructional Material
Postage
In Service Training
Test Fees
7000
EQUIPMENT-
QUIPMENT-TOTAL
TOTAL$ 11,223
A.DNMSTR.ATION 2,157
GRAND TOTAL $13,380
7,777 19,000
$7,777 $19 ,0![?
338 2,495
$8,115 $21,495
10:0_'i2ti301 10: 44 TAP THIS VALLEY WORKS EDU -YOUTH a 93875203
Expenditure
Category
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
IATERACY/ROANOKE COUNTY JAIL
ADMINISTRATION BUDGET WORKSHEET
2001-2402
Local
Cash FederaV
Match State
PERSONAE. SERVICES
A/L Accrual
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
FICA
VUTA
FICA A/L
W.C.
Retirement
EAP
General Insurance
PURCHASED SERVICES
INTERNAL SERVICES
OTHER CHARGES
Fiscal Administration -Roanoke Adult ED.
Fiscal Support -County J4 $ 2,157
5000 MATERIALS lig SUPPLIES
7000 EQUIPMENT
GRAND TOTAL $ 2,157
$ 33A
NO. 166 GWi
Total
338
2,157
S 338 $ 2,495
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, IN REGULAR MEETING
ON THE 23RD DAY OF OCTOBER 2001, ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING:
RESOLUTION 102301-7.e REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF MONET DRIVE
INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY
SYSTEM
WHEREAS, the street described on the attached Addition Form SR -5(A), fully
incorporated herein by reference are shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of
the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation
has advised this Board the streets meet the requirements established by the
Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation,
WHEREAS, the County and the Virginia Department of Transportation have
entered into an agreement on March 9, 1999 for comprehensive stormwater detention
which applies to this request for addition,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia
Department of Transportation to add the streets described on the attached Additions
Form SR -5(A) to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code
of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted
right-of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage,
and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be
forwarded to the resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation.
Recorded Vote
Moved By: Supervisor Johnson
Seconded By: None Required
Yeas: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix
Nays: None
Absent: None
A Copy Teste:.AA4"-& 0, 4 ---
Brenda J. Holto0h, CMC
Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections
Virginia Department of Transportation
J-5
NORTH
DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
THE GROVES, SECT. 8
Acceptance of Monet Drive into
the Virginia Department of
Transportation Secondary System.
zo
%
�
¥
_
/
�
■
/
«
R g�
£ �
\ }
/ )
%
�[
§
�
7
;
I
§
i
3
» «
-
6
E /
\
/
/
/
/
C.
/
/
�
k
%
.
)
}
\
/
e
x
)
cc
}\
£
I
—
.
Lf _
2
ct
\
/
\
\
\
\
\
\
§
}
/
ƒ
ƒ
}
/
F
/
/
\
e
E
;
3
3
s
e
e
e
E
_/
a�
a/
e
E
e§
j
�
\
}
.
=
o
\
)
\
§
}
7
z
/
�
A
In
w
)
z
!
i
A-102301-7 .f
ACTION NO.
ITEM NO.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: October 23, 2001
AGENDA ITEM: ACCEPTANCE OF DONATION OF A 20' SANITARY SEWER
EASEMENT FROM PROFESSIONAL COORDINATED SERVICES, INC.
(BOTETOURT COUNTY TAX MAP NO. 106-17 & NO. 106-22) ON
RESERVOIR ROAD IN THE AREA OF THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL
DISTRICT
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
This consent agenda item involves the acceptance ofthe following easement for sanitary sewer
purposes in connection with development of the Professional Coordinated Services, Inc. property on
Reservoir Road, in the area of the Hollins Magisterial District, conveyed to the Board of Supervisors
of Roanoke County, Virginia:
a) Donation of a sanitary sewer easement, twenty feet (20) in width, from
Professional Coordinated Services, Inc. (Botetourt County Deed Book 407,
page 210, and Deed Book 369, page 200; Tax Map No. 106-17 & No. 106-
22), as shown on a plat prepared by Kyle D. Austin, L.S., dated August 2�,
2001, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
The location and dimensions of this easement have been reviewed and approved by the
County's engineering and utility staff.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends acceptance of the donation of this easement.
Respectfully submitted,
*" lj;'' I/
cki . Huffm
Sr. Assistant Cou y Attorney
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
No Yes Abs
Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson to approve Church _ x
Denied () Johnson _ x _
Received () McNamara_ x _
Referred () Minnix _ x _
To () Nickens x
cc: File
Vickie Huffman, Senior Assistant County Attorney
Gary Robertson, Director, Utility
Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development
2
Shaded Area Denotes Sanitary Sewer Easement
Area = 5,686 Sq. Ft. (0.131 Ac.)
Ann B. Walls Mason Haynesworth
& D.B. 46, Pg. 561
Nancy B. Birdsong Tax j 106-14
D.B. 39, Pg. 542
Tax # 166-16
1 Iron Pipe Fd.
W
tD
i�nain in cTrence - s
Pin
$78.52 „
'20
0
_
Lo N
+ D1 m
f
a
�
William S. & Sibyl P. Johnson
oD.B.
N
m
224, Pg. 001
Tax 106-1B
Easement Plat Showing
a 20' Sanitary Sewer Easement
L-
2
Professional Coordinated Services, Inc.
Professional
.0
LDeed
Professional
Z
Coordinated Services, Inc.
ZBotetourt
County, Virginia
Coordinated Services, Inc.
j
D.B. 369, Pg. 200
>
D.B. 407, Pg. 210
N
Tax # 106-22
^,
tD
O
Tax # 106-17
LO O
W
co
�w
0
20' Sanitary Sewer
EasementEM
_--
co —
-d' Iron
tD
i�nain in cTrence - s
Pin
$78.52 „
'20
156.72,
0
a
Lo N
+ D1 m
a V
+ c C
7
a
�
William S. & Sibyl P. Johnson
oD.B.
N
m
224, Pg. 001
Tax 106-1B
Easement Plat Showing
a 20' Sanitary Sewer Easement
Located on Property of
Professional Coordinated Services, Inc.
Deed Book 369, Page 200.
Book 407, Page 210.
LDeed
�pAmsterdam
Magesterial District
ZBotetourt
County, Virginia
DAUSTIN
IN —
D
Scale: 1 " = 5.0' Date: August 23, 2001
Kyle D. Austin L.S.
P.O. Boa 749
Buchanan, Virginia 24066
Telephone 0 (540) 254-1746
EXHIBIT A
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 2001
RESOLUTION 102301-8 CERTIFYING THE CLOSED MEETING WAS
HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened
a closed meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance
with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.2-3712 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the
Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such closed meeting was
conducted in conformity with Virginia law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge:
1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements
by Virginia law were discussed in the closed meeting which this certification resolution
applies, and
2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the
closed meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia.
On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the Certification Resolution, and carried by
the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Brenda J. Hol on, CMC
Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Closed Meeting File
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 2001
ORDINANCE 102301-9 AMENDING THE ROANOKE COUNTY ZONING
ORDINANCE, SECTION 30-21.B.. "ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES"
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as
follows:
Sec. 30-21. Enforcement Procedures.
(B) Property owners, permit applicants, and/or establishment owners/managers,
as applicable, shall be notified in writing of violations of the provisions of this ordinance.
The administrator shall, in the notice of violation, state the nature of the violation, the date
that it was observed, and the remedy or remedies necessary to correct the violation. The
administrator may establish a reasonable time period for the correction of the violation,
however in no case shall such time period exceed fifteen j ten,j10� days from the date
of written notification, except that the administrator may allow a longer time period to
correct the violation if the correction would require the structural alteration of a building or
structure.
(C) If the violation is not corrected within the time period specified in the first
notification, a second written notice shall be sent. The second notification shall request
compliance with these provisions within a period not to exceed seven (7) days.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
I
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
&-&dA - kil��
Brenda J. Hol n, CMC
Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Janet Scheid, Chief Planner
Circuit Court
Clifford R. Weckstein, Judge
Diane McQ. Strickland, Judge
Richard C. Pattisall, Judge
Robert P. Doherty, Jr., Judge
Jonathan M. Apgar, Judge
James R. Swanson, Judge
Steven A. McGraw, Clerk
Juvenile Domestic Relations District Court
Joseph M. Clarke, II, Judge
Philip Trompeter, Judge
John B. Ferguson, Judge
Joseph P. Bounds, Judge
Ruth P. Bates, Clerk
Intake Counsellor
General District Court
George W. Harris, Judge
William Broadhurst, Judge
Vincent Lilley, Judge
Julian H. Raney, Judge
Jacqueline F. Ward Talevi, Judge
Theresa A. Childress, Clerk
Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
Magistrates Sherri Krantz/Betty Perry
Main Library
Ray Lavinder, Police Chief
Richard Burch, Chief of Fire & Rescue
Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke 24016
Roanoke County Law Library, Singleton Osterhoudt
Roanoke County Code Book
Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff
John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator
Dan O'Donnell, Assistant County Administrator
Diane D. Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer
Kathi Scearce, Director, Community Relations
Danial Morris, Director, Finance
O. Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development
Gary Robertson, Director, Utility
Elaine Carver, Director, Information Technology
Anne Marie Green, Director, General Services
Thomas S. Haislip, Director, Parks, Recreation & Tourism
Gardner Smith, Director, Procurement
William E. Driver Director, Real Estate Valuation
Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer
Nancy Horn, Commissioner of Revenue
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER, TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 2001
ORDINANCE 102301-10 TO CHANGE THEZONING CLASSIFICATION OF
A 3.71 -ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 3990
CHALLENGER DRIVE (PART OF TAX MAP NO. 50.05-1-1) IN THE
HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION OF C-1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-3
WITH CONDITIONS UPON THE APPLICATION OF BOWMAN DALTON,
INC.
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on July 24, 2001, and the
second reading and public hearing were held August 28, 2001, at which time this matter
was referred to the Planning Commission for further consideration; and
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this
matter on August 7, 2001, and on October 2, 2001; and
WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as
follows:
1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 3.71 -
acres, as described herein, and located at 3990 Challenger Drive (Part of Tax Map
Number 50.05-1-1) in the Hollins Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning
classification of C-1, Office District, to the zoning classification of R-3, Medium Density
Multifamily Residential District.
2. That this action is taken upon the application of Bowman Dalton, Inc.
3. That the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing the following
conditions which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts:
(a) The subject property will be developed in substantial conformity with
1
the plat entitled "Plat Showing Rezoning Exhibit, Property of Robert L. Metz and Reba S.
Metz," prepared by Lumsden Associates, P.C., under date of August 8, 2001, Exhibit A.
(b) The C-1 and R-3 property shall share a common access road.
4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows:
Beginning at a point on the northerly side of Challenger Avenue at the southeasterly
corner of the property of W. M. Witt and Mary B. Witt (Tax Map No. 50.05-1-3);
thence N. 37 deg. 15'00'W. 200.85 feet to the actual place of beginning; thence S.
37 deg. 1600" E. 298.52 feet to a point; thence N. 51 deg. 00' E. 539.88 feet to a
point; thence S. 37 deg. 15'00" E. 277.28 feet to a point; thence S. 48 deg. 45' W.
301.79 feet to a point on the easterly side of the Proposed Private Road Common
Area; thence with same generally in a southerly direction to the northerly right-of-
way of Challenger Avenue; thence S. 32 deg. 00'W. 54.62 feet to the westerly side
of the Proposed Private Road; thence proceeding with the westerly side of the
private road in a northerly direction to a point on the southerly line of the Common
Area; thence S. 48 deg. 45'W. 199.05 feet to the Place of Beginning, and containing
3.71 acres.
5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this
ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed
to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized
by this ordinance.
On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
&46W,L 0 - VUAI�
Brenda J. H ton, CMC
Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
2
cc: File
Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development
Janet Scheid, Chief Planner
William E. Driver, Director, Real Estate Valuation
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
ROANOKE COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Apbicants name: Bowman -Dalton,, Inc.
Zoning: Rezoning from C-1 to R-3
Tax Map No. 50.05-1-1
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 2001
ORDINANCE 102301-11 AUTHORIZING THE VACATION OF AN
EXISTING 20' DRAINAGE EASEMENT AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE
RELOCATED 20' DRAINAGE EASEMENT ON PROPERTY OF LEON P.
HARRIS AND BEVERLY Y. HARRIS, NEW LOT 3A, SECTION 26,
HUNTING HILLS(PLAT BOOK 16, PAGE 165; PLAT BOOK 19, PAGE 20;
TAX MAP NO. 87.16-4-3) IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
WHEREAS, by subdivision plat entitled'SECTION NO. 26, HUNTING HILLS', dated
May 3, 1994, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County,
Virginia, in Plat Book 16, page 165, a "NEW 20' D.E." [drainage easement] was dedicated
and shown across Lot 3; and,
WHEREAS, the subject drainage easement is further shown on 'NEW LOT 3A' and
designated as "20' D.E., P.B. 16, pg. 165" on re -subdivision plat entitled 'PLAT OF
SUBDIVISION FOR PROPERTY OF ROBERT C. LAUCHER AND ANNA JEAN LAUGHER
CREATING HEREON NEW LOT 1A (1.657 AC.) AND NEW LOT 3A (1.624 AC.) BEING
ORIGINAL LOTS 1, 2 & 3, SECTION NO. 26 "HUNTING HILLS" (PLAT BOOK 16, page
165),' dated August 9, 1996, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 19,
page 20; and
WHEREAS, Leon P. Harris and Beverly Y. Harris are the current owners of 'New Lot
3A', Section 26, Hunting Hills, designated on the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax
Map No. 87.16-4-3; and,
WHEREAS, the owners have requested that, pursuant to §15.2-2272.2 of the Code
of Virginia (1950, as amended), the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia,
vacate the above-described existing 20' drainage easement, and accept in exchange a new
20' drainage easement across New Lot 3A, Section 26, Hunting Hills, P. B. 19, Pg. 20; and,
WHEREAS, this vacation and acceptance will involve minimal cost to the County
and the relocation has been approved by the County's engineering staff; and,
WHEREAS, notice has been given as required by § 15.2-2204 of the Code of
Virginia (1950, as amended), and the first reading of this ordinance was held on October
9, 2001; the public hearing and second reading of this ordinance was held on October 23,
2001.
THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That the existing 20' drainage easement on Lot 3, designated as "NEW 20'
D.E."and dedicated by subdivision plat entitled 'SECTION NO. 26, HUNTING HILLS',
dated May 3, 1994, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 16, page 165,
and further shown as "20' D.E., P.B. 16, pg. 165" on 'NEW LOT 3A' on the above-described
re -subdivision plat of record in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Plat Book 19, page 20, said
easement being shown cross -hatched and designated as "EXISTING 20' DRAINAGE
EASEMENT TO BE VACATED" on the partial copy of the plat recorded in Plat Book 16,
page 165, attached hereto as Exhibit A, be, and hereby is, vacated pursuant to § 15.2-2272
of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended).
2. That, in exchange, acquisition and acceptance of a new 20' drainage
easement across New Lot 3A, Section 26, Hunting Hills, P.B. 19, Pg. 20, Tax Map No.
87.16-4-3, being designated and shown as "NEW 20' DRAINAGE EASEMENT" on Exhibit
B attached hereto, be and hereby is, authorized and approved; and,
3. That the publication costs and recordation fees are to be paid from the budget
of the Department of Community Development.
4. That the County Administrator, or an Assistant County Administrator, is
hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary
to accomplish the provisions of this ordinance, all of which shall be on form approved by
the County Attorney.
5. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption, and
a certified copy of this ordinance shall be recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court
2
of Roanoke County, Virginia, in accordance with §15.2-2272.2 of the Code of Virginia
(1950, as amended).
On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following
recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, McNamara, Church, Nickens, Minnix
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
&LA�' 4A�Brenda J. Holton, CMC
Deputy Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development
Janet Scheid, Senior Planner
William E. Driver, Director, Real Estate Valuation
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
3
G 50
RTE• #1421G
o
��-
C
F
Wr-
r-
na W r�ONOpI m�
NP
V)
N
ILY
n
QW
Z
Nn
11
ZQ
`•
2 Zz
�doi
N
a
> w
'
i
tC
CL z
W
W
x E5
N
Ulz�
d
C,WA
X
Q
H
J
4
�
n�to c)aomaa
N
N55'56'227 E 199.73
N� t
o. CO �l O
C)
Z7 m �_ h v' { W
U S a ` I !-•{ q N K
N I
of j p W U
m
J+N Z
N " W ! T67,9T
J t2°o
\� 7 l4� I
cull
m o /
O�W
�7 1 C'j
D
�WF<_
C <
<> o]
� o
EXHIBIT A
0
W
0
7-
0 �m
C !7
W W .
Z2;
F O O
m.
C) �W
1- N ID I
WOr
Z z
W TO!
V)
W W
CL
�S
w o;I
N FoI
T ¢NI
O
� an[
� Z
m US`
W W
W a r
~ W [
W O [
Q 00[
J h -La [
3 02�
Q F o [
Z 2
Y moo_[
Z"N0o92 N.
(7 m Y N
W
Wr-
r-
na W r�ONOpI m�
<
V)
N
r.�Noo�onDowto.
mmow
n
QW
W
p
NN m,ea
ZQ
t': r, r, r�vl�nhr:
N
a
14,60.ti�N \,
o¢
Ulz�
r1, aor-,n.00to
ocoaopIDmmm��
d
N
}�z
n�to c)aomaa
nr�nc-,
a
QUA
NNmp W IN OM
tom
p
z
O
z
nmrnr"o o6T wtn
n r.:r-:r- P-:06 n r1 ri
N
Oz
o
r\�.isbos v Z0 m � 1"
U
m
p
OZ
lu
4
i
�Nn almm�mCn
J
14o.
U
m o /
O�W
�7 1 C'j
D
�WF<_
C <
<> o]
� o
EXHIBIT A
0
W
0
7-
0 �m
C !7
W W .
Z2;
F O O
m.
C) �W
1- N ID I
WOr
Z z
W TO!
V)
W W
CL
�S
w o;I
N FoI
T ¢NI
O
� an[
� Z
m US`
W W
W a r
~ W [
W O [
Q 00[
J h -La [
3 02�
Q F o [
Z 2
Y moo_[
C\l z �No[j
m b
[i \\ DO
n
14,60.ti�N \,
Nj W N
Z
o
r\�.isbos v Z0 m � 1"
p
\
I \ r9496��
lu
i
V
.sr tSZB �� I J
�
VAN
�
A( -
vi
(r
000m1
w
�Z�n ¢pXH
1 /
�Z=ozW
�l
rL
cv6
/
/
/
Cli
<.�
�
M 1
m o /
O�W
�7 1 C'j
D
�WF<_
C <
<> o]
� o
EXHIBIT A
0
W
0
7-
0 �m
C !7
W W .
Z2;
F O O
m.
C) �W
1- N ID I
WOr
Z z
W TO!
V)
W W
CL
�S
w o;I
N FoI
T ¢NI
O
� an[
� Z
m US`
W W
W a r
~ W [
W O [
Q 00[
J h -La [
3 02�
Q F o [
Z 2
Y moo_[
fox P, I Rir�
5�
hyo• RT•
J� •
of
3 o� ¢6"5/
,/07-
SEC. 26-
A7' u117-11/6
1-%/L L s
RoA°
X420 �
13•
ARG
1v-
-A m d
I
io' ia' I
2t
Q yj
.�
z
0
0
NEW .Lo -r 9,4 9 —�.-
J
Q
'V
SECT/ON 2G, HUNTING .0/CLS
P.•6. /9, z0 o
o
j
W
p
�
I
OF EY/577/N6
WATER COURSE
/S g' OFEk/ST/NG2
I
LEGAL REFEe
0
O
,ORA//1.466" ES M' T.
�
TAY No. 87. /6 - 4 -3
SEE PLAT ,BOO/
1046E /38
LEG6N
PROPERTY LINE , S UR VE V FOR
CEAITER LINE E p HAR R / s
eo
NLTH Ofi �4
U DAVID A. GESS
No, 602240
� 9 3v-'98
qN0 SUR%,&
$NOW/NG A NEW 20, DRA/NAGE EASEMENT 70
,BEMCDICATEID TO RoANOkE COUNTY, VIRGIN/4
S/TUATEON NEW ,GOT .7,9, SEC. 26, HUNT/NG
lQOAMO�tE ounlTY , VIIRG/A//A.
,9Cr41-E /'= 2o' ,-4EP7EM8ER .30,1998
JACK G. BESS
LAND SURVEYOR
5422 STAT BEY RD
ane AtniCF VA ']AMA
N.,g. /o/ s 9 & 1 0- 98551