HomeMy WebLinkAbout7/23/2002 - Adopted Board RecordsA-072302-1
ACTION NO.
ITEM NUMBER E
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: July 23, 2002
AGENDA ITEM: Request to approve designation of the new park in North Roanoke
as Hollins Park
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
In September 2001, Roanoke County Parks, Recreation and Tourism began construction on a
new park located on Hollins Road in North Roanoke. Phase I, which will include two soccer
fields, a 73 -car parking lot and a playground, is scheduled for completion in August 2002. At
present, the contractor is preparing the access road and parking area. The soccer fields are
seeded and ready for use in the Fall. Parks and Recreation staff will be working to complete the
playground in August 2002. A grand opening will be held in September 2002.
During the construction phase of the project, the park was referred to as North Roanoke Park.
Following discussions with Hollins members of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission,
it is recommended that the park be officially named Hollins Park, after the community area in
which it is located. This is in keeping with prior naming traditions
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
ALTERNATIVES:
Alternative 1: Leave the name as North Roanoke Park.
Alternative 2: Designate the name as Hollins Park.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Alternative 2, designating the name as Hollins Park..
Respectfully submitted,
Pete Haislip
Director of Parks, Recreation & Tourism
Approved by,
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
No Yes Abs
Approved (x) Motion by: Richard C. Flora to approve Church _ x _
Denied () staff recommendation Flora _ x —
Received () McNamara— x _
Referred () Minnix — x
To () Nickens _ x —
cc: File
Pete Haislip, Director, Parks, Recreation & Tourism
Action No. A-072302-2
Item No
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER
MEETING DATE: July 23, 2002
AGENDA ITEM: Authorization to commence a civil action against Whitlow Auto
Crushers and Sales, et al. to compel the removal of waste tires
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
Recommend approval
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Whitlow Auto Crushers and Sales and Joy Leon Whitlow and Virginia Alice
Whitlow own approximately 532 acres of real estate located off Ridgelea Road. A
portion of this property (32+ acres) has been the site of business operations crushing
and demolishing automobiles. As a result of these operations, the Virginia Department
of Environmental Quality estimates that there are over 50,000 waste tires on this
property.
In September of 1999, the County entered a Consent Order with the Whitlows to
reduce the acreage used for these business operations to approximately 17.5 acres and
to remove and clean up the remainder of the property within 18 months. Sections 3 C.
and D. of the Consent Order provide as follows:
C. Whitlow shall reduce the acreage and use of the business to
the area shown on Exhibit 1 on or before within the 18 month period set
out above. This reduction in use and business operations shall include the
following: reduce and remove junk cars; remove trash, garbage, and
rubbish, including gasoline tanks, batteries, and tires, and dispose of all
materials in accordance with the provisions of law.
D. The specific uses to be made of the 17.5 -acre property in
conjunction with the operation of Whitlow Auto Crushers and Sales is
limited as follows: (i) to crush vehicles, (ii) to salvage metals, and (iii) to
recycle materials from vehicles. All tires from vehicles to be disposed of in
accordance with provisions of law. All batteries will be sold to battery
recycling operations or otherwise disposed of in accordance with the
provisions of law.
Section 10.1-1418.2 of the Code of Virginia states that it is unlawful for any
person to store, dump, litter, dispose of, speculatively accumulate, or otherwise place
more than 100 waste tires on public or private property without first having obtained a
permit from DEQ. The Whitlows do not have a permit to store these tires on their
property. Section 10.1-1418.1 authorizes any political subdivision to bring a civil action
against any person who improperly disposes of solid waste. The court may impose a
civil penalty of up to $5000 against persons who improperly dispose of solid waste; and
this civil penalty shall be paid into the treasury of the political subdivision. The court
may also award reasonable attorney's fees.
As a result of the recent Keeling tire fire, Roanoke County is very concerned
about the existence of the storage of tire piles in the County. Roanoke County believes
that the Whitlows should dispose of these tires in a prompt, timely, and lawful manner.
Despite repeated requests from County staff and the provisions of the Consent Order
referenced above, the Whitlows have failed to eliminate or significantly reduce this tire
pile. The accumulation of over 50,000 tires on this property constitutes a public
nuisance and a hazard to our community.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Board authorize and direct the County Attorney to
commence a civil action against Whitlow Auto Crushers and Sales and Joy Leon
Whitlow and Virginia Alice Whitlow to compel the elimination and lawful disposal of all of
the tires on their property.
Respectfully submitted:
paam. rna�
Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney
Approved (x)
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred ( )
To ( )
ACTION VOTE
No Yes Abs
Motion by: Joseph P. McNamara to Church x
approve staff recommendation Flora x
McNamara x
cc: File
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
Minnix
Nickens
A-072302-3
ACTION NO.
ITEM NUMBER
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER
MEETING DATE: July 23, 2002
AGENDA ITEM: Public Private Partnership (PPP) Policy Revision
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND:
A Work Session was held at the July 9, 2002 Board of Supervisors meeting to discuss
proposed revisions to the County's PPP Policy. After discussion the Board indicated
consensus to proceed with the proposed changes. A draft of the new policy is attached to
this report.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The most significant changes to the current policy are: 1) The County may participate up
to 100% of public improvement costs for a new or expanded project. 2) Incentives may be
paid on a reimbursable basis based on new tax revenue generation. 3) Retail/commercial
projects will be calculated on a one year payback. Industrial projects will be calculated on a
three year payback.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Funds for each project will be appropriated from the PPP fund account which is allocated
yearly by the Board of Supervisors. Participation in excess of $50,000 shall be approved
by the Board.
[-3
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval and adoption of the proposed revisions to the PPP Policy.
Respectfully submitted,
Doug Chittum
Economic Development Director
Approved by,
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
ACTION VOTE
No Yes Abs
Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C Nickens to approve Church _ x _
Denied () Flora _ x
Received () McNamara_ x _
Referred () Minnix _ x
To () Nickens _ x _
cc: File
Doug Chittum, Director, Economic Development
Wanda Riley, Policy Manual
COUNTY OF ROANOKE
PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP POLICY
(Revised June 2002)
Introduction
f_3
The County established a Public -Private Partnership Program to further its economic
development mission — to design and implement innovative programs and services that leverage
community assets, create wealth & prosperity, and embrace the region's future. The distribution
of various incentives in the form of County funds or other assets is the intent of the Program.
These distributions are made to qualifying enterprises or organizations to encourage them to
create or retain jobs and investment in the County and the region. This Policy establishes a
framework by which the Program can be equitably and efficiently administered.
Guidinu Principles
The Public -Private Partnership Policy is developed and applied in concert with the County's
Business Plan for Economic Development. The Policy reflects the County's commitment to
attract and retain quality jobs and investment and to maintain strong working relationships with
its public and private sector partners. This is an investment Program, whereby the County seeks
to ensure a reasonable return on its investment of funds or other assets as measured by tax
revenues and quality jobs created or retained.
Financial incentives offered by Roanoke County originate from the tax revenues paid by citizens,
visitors, and businesses in the County. The Public Private Partnership Policy seeks to reinvest
some portion of these tax revenues to assist in the economic growth of the County.
During the initial site search for a location or the expansion of an existing facility, Roanoke
County and a business or industry develops a partnership designed to accommodate the specific
needs of the project. Accordingly:
1. Roanoke County may fund a portion or all of development costs for public
improvements, such as roads and public utilities, off site regional storm water
management facilities, and/or utility connection fees for water and sewer for a qualifying
industry or business that meets the evaluation criteria for Public Private Partnerships.
2. Roanoke County may encourage the creation or retention of jobs of qualifying companies
within the community, which hire employees at wages/salaries at or above the median
area rate for that occupation through assistance with employment training.
3. Roanoke County may support tourism related industry/destination activities that provide
range of services and attractions for visitors from outside the Roanoke Valley that will
create employment opportunities and tax revenues, and enhance our image as a viable
community.
4. Roanoke County will allocate incentives in a manner that favors development in the
following "Target Industries:"
Automotive & Transportation related Products & Technology
Biotechnology/Biosciences & Biomedical Systems & Equipment
Electrical/Electronic Components & Assembly
Metal Fabrication & Machine Tools
Information & Telecommunications Products & Technology
Commercial & Retail operations
Tourism related operations
Other Value Added Manufacturing operations
Incentives will not be used to relocate a business/industry from another jurisdiction in the
Roanoke Valley to the County unless it can be shown that the subject jobs and investment
might otherwise be lost to the Roanoke Valley, and/or the business has determined that
the best location for their new operation is in an Economic Opportunity Area as
designated in the Roanoke County Economic Development Strategy.
Typical areas of Partnership Assistance
Physical improvements and fees, such as:
a. Water and sewer line extensions
b. Water, fire, and sewer utility connection fees
C. Public road construction and required drainage structures
d. Traffic control devices such as signals and related equipment
e. Regional storm water management facilities
f. Land acquisition for public purposes (i.e. industrial rail and/or road
access, road widening, easement acquisition ... )
g. Employment training/retraining
Requests for assistance with employment training and retraining of new and/or relocated
employees may be considered. Amounts and priority of funding will depend on the salary/wage
rate to be paid, the number of permanent full time jobs created, relocated or retained, and
availability of matching funds from the state of Virginia and federal funds.
Operating Procedures
The Director of Economic Development is responsible for administering this Policy and shall
2
coordinate with the Director of Finance to establish a system to account for funds committed and
expended. A business or industry may apply for County assistance by addressing a letter (on
company letterhead) to the Director of Economic Development that indicates:
a. A description of the business or tourism activity to be conducted on the site, that
indicates the reasons why public financial participation is needed to complete the
project.
b. Total capital investment in real estate (land, building), machinery and tools, and
anticipated personal property, and/or other taxes paid on site
C. Total employment and annual payroll for jobs to be created or retained over the
next five years
d. Numbers and types of positions/jobs created or retained and average annual
hourly salaries or wage for each over the next five years
e. Specific infrastructure requirements such as water and sewer needs (including line
size and/or capacity), off site road improvements, storm water management
facilities, or other public facility assistance requested
f. Date of construction and/or start-up (if in an existing building)
g. If applicable, the terms of any lease to ensure that the company will occupy the
building during the period calculated for payback.
Review
The Director of Economic Development will review the request for participation using the
evaluation criteria on worksheets 1 and 2 to determine the extent of Roanoke County's funding.
These evaluation criteria are based on a payback of anticipated taxes (real estate, machinery and
tools, personal property, transient occupancy tax, sales tax, admissions tax, etc.) to the County,
and jobs created/retained by number and type of employees. The County may participate in the
following manner:
a. New or expanding commercial/retail/office projects must have a payback within one
year.
b. New or expanding manufacturing/industrial projects must have a payback within
three years.
c. County incentives may be packaged with those offered by local, State or Federal
agencies to leverage the opportunity. Such incentive packages will be structured
so as to provide maximum return on the County's assets.
d. The incentive may be paid on a reimbursable basis, following an audit verifying
the new local tax revenues generated by the project.
The County may participate up to 100% of public improvement costs for a new and expanded
project if the payback meets any of the classes listed above and qualifies under Worksheet 2. The
County Administrator has the authority to invest up to $50,000 in any one project without prior
approval of the Board of Supervisors. Participation in projects with greater than $50,000
participation, with paybacks longer than those outlined above, or which fall outside the criteria
stated, shall be referred to the Board of Supervisors for a decision.
All applications are subject to the amount of the County's annual budget appropriation for this
purpose.
Criteria for determination
a. Incentives will not be approved in situations where it can be determined that they
would not materially effect the decision of the applicant to undertake the project or
otherwise make an investment in the County.
b. No projects will be considered which are determined to produce significant
environmental pollution, public nuisance or excessive demands for local public
services.
C. Excess County payments shall be refunded by the applicant if the actual tax
revenues do not meet the payback formula in accordance with the Performance
Agreement executed between the County and the business or industry.
d. All applications for payments of costs up to $50,000 for physical improvements
and/or fees, which comply with the above criteria, will be approved by the County
Administrator upon a positive recommendation by the Department of Economic
Development.
e. Tourism projects will be evaluated on the basis of expected visitation and
concentration of tourism activities in areas proposed by the Economic
Development Strategy, as well as other criteria for new jobs and anticipated tax
revenues.
f.. If appropriate, Public Private Partnership funds may be passed through the
Industrial Development Authority of Roanoke County to a qualifying business or
industry subject to the stipulations set out in the Performance Agreement.
g. Developers of commercial or industrial projects for lease must pass on the value
of the incentives to the tenant business or industry by lowering the annual lease
rate and/or by providing for additional tenant improvements. A copy of the
executed lease in which the County participation is identified shall be presented to
the Director of Economic Development upon request.
h. A business or industry obtaining Public Private Partnership funds shall coordinate
any public announcement of its location in the County with Department staff in
order to obtain positive media coverage for the activity.
i. Recipients of Program funds will provide on an annual basis a report (including
written verification of the annual taxes paid to Roanoke County) of their progress
in meeting the terms of the Program Agreement. Such report will be delivered to
the Department of Economic Development within 30 days of the anniversary date
of the Agreement.
Limitations
Roanoke County will not pay for any private sewage pre-treatment facilities or waive any
ordinances requiring fire protection or industrial discharge certification.
Funding Sources
Roanoke County shall fund its participation from the General Fund from anticipated tax revenue,
or from an Economic Development Fund or other special non-utility funds. There is intent to
continue the maintenance of a fiscally sound utility enterprise fund to provide water and sewer
service to County utility customers. (County Code Chapter 22 authorizes this provision, as
amended by Ordinance 8-12-86-169, Section 3b.)
Public Disclosure
There shall be disclosure of any financial or other involvement by staff members and elected
officials in any public private partnership.
Award of Funds
Upon the evaluation and decision to enter into an Agreement, the Director of Economic
Development will notify the expanding or relocating business/industry in writing. This letter
will identify the County's funding level as well as any other areas of assistance.
Agreement
A written "Performance Agreement," in a form to be approved by the County Attorney that
specifies the terms and obligations of each party will be executed prior to the disbursement of
any Program funds.
Any questions regarding the preparation of an application for financial assistance under the criteria
of the Public Private Partnership Policy should be directed to the Director of Economic
Development, P.O. Box 29800, Roanoke, Virginia 24018-0798. Phone (540) 772-2069.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 23, 2002
ORDINANCE 072302-4 AUTHORIZING CONVEYANCE OF AN
EASEMENT TO APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY FOR ELECTRIC
SERVICE WITHIN THE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT ALONG
CORPORATE CIRCLE ACROSS PROPERTY OWNED BY THE BOARD
OF SUPERVISORS AT THE CENTER FOR RESEARCH AND
TECHNOLOGY IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
WHEREAS, Roanoke County staff is coordinating the development of the Center
for Research and Technology; and,
WHEREAS, Appalachian Power Company (APCO) requires a right of way and
easement for underground transmission lines within the public utility easement on the
County's property along Corporate Circle to provide electric service to the sites as
shown on the `Combination, Re -Subdivision and Vacation Plat for The Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, Center for Research & Technology (CRT),
Section One', dated February 8, 2002, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit
Court of Roanoke County in Plat Book 25, page 54; and,
WHEREAS, the proposed right of way will serve the interests of the public and is
necessary for the public health, safety, and welfare of citizens of the County of
Roanoke.
THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County
Charter, the acquisition and disposition of real estate can be authorized only by
1
ordinance. A first reading of this ordinance was held on July 9, 2002, and a second
reading was held on July 23, 2002.
2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of
Roanoke County, the interests in real estate to be conveyed are hereby declared to be
surplus, and are hereby made available for other public uses by conveyance to
Appalachian Power Company for the provision of electrical service in connection with
Roanoke County's development of the Center for Research and Technology.
3. That donation to Appalachian Power Company of an easement and right-
of-way for underground transmission lines and related improvements, within the 15'
"NEW PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT" on the County's property (Tax Map No. 54.00-1-2) along
Corporate Circle to provide electric service to CRT as shown on the 'Combination, Re -
Subdivision and Vacation Plat for The Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, Center for Research & Technology (CRT), Section One', dated February 8,
2002, and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County in Plat
Book 25, page 54, is hereby authorized and approved.
4. That the County Administrator, or any assistant county administrator, is
hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such further actions as may be
necessary to accomplish this conveyance, all of which shall be on form approved by the
County Attorney.
5. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption.
On motion of Supervisor Church to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
2
AYES: Supervisors Flora, McNamara, Minnix, Nickens, Church
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
L-1 IQ ) sg' (jVLJ) )
Diane S. Childers
Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
cc: File
George W. Simpson, III, P. E., Assistant Director, Community Development
Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development
Doug Chittum, Director, Economic Development
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
3
continuation of
EXHIBIT A
�T -
V)
0 0
Z
ME u
Lu >: lu—j uz-j F-
-� z" w z a C2 ad
CL
IR cses
z OW
Ln C)
U- 0
m C)
LJ
< w Li fl!z'
x 0 En
6u W k
< z Ln
uj 0 >
0 < w
00 Z<
Lu
SIO
C) U-<
LLJ
mon Q^
uj
rc Li e
sia, z 5
z
I
tg
ae�mIRF;
to Z
zLo
continuation of
EXHIBIT A
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 23, 2002
RESOLUTION 072302-5 APPROVING AND CONCURRING
IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED
AS ITEM J - CONSENT AGENDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as
follows:
1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for July 23,
2002 designated as Item J - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and
concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1
through 4, inclusive, as follows:
1. Acceptance of water and sewer facilities serving The Orchards
apartment homes
2. Acceptance of the Bureau of Justice Assistance Block Grant in the
amount of $32,132 by the Police Department for law enforcement
support
3. Acceptance of a Bureau of Justice Assistance Bulletproof Vest
Partnership Grant in the amount of $10,689.82
4. Request to accept donation of water easement located in the
Plantation Grove Subdivision
That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by
law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item
pursuant to this resolution.
1
On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the Consent Resolution, and carried by
the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Flora, McNamara, Minnix, Nickens, Church
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
4
/I 11A
Diane S. Childers
Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Gary Robertson, Director, Utility
Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development
J. Ray Lavinder, Chief of Police
Danial Morris, Director, Finance
2
A -072302-5.a
ACTION #
ITEM NUMBER " 1
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: July 23, 2002
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Water and Sewer Facilities Serving The Orchards
Apartment Homes
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Developers of The Orchards Apartment Homes, North Carolina Limited Liability
Company, have requested that Roanoke County accept the Deed conveying the water
and sanitary sewer facilities serving the subdivision along with all necessary easements.
The water and sanitary sewer facilities are installed, as shown on plans prepared by
Deep River Engineering, PLCC entitled The Orchard Apartment Homes, which are on
file in the Community Development Department. The water and sanitary sewer facility
construction meets the specifications and the plans approved by the County.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The value of the water and sanitary sewer construction is $68,456.00 and $59,100.00
respectively.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the water and sanitary sewer
facilities serving The Orchards Apartment Homes along with all necessary easements,
and authorize the County Administrator to execute a Deed for the transfer of these
facilities.
SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED:
Gary Robertson, P.E. Elmer C. Hodge
Utility Director County Administrator
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
No Yes
Approved (x) Motion by: H Odell Minnix to approve Church _ x
Denied () Flora — x
Received () McNamara_ x
Referred () Minnix _ x
To () Nickens _ x
cc: File
Gary Robertson, Director, Utility
Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development
Abs
Return To:
Roanoke County
Attorney's Office
THIS CHATTEL DEED, made this 20th day of May, 2002, by and between: DFC, LLC, a
North Carolina Limited Liability Company, hereinafter, referred to as the "Developer," party
of the first part; and the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OFROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, its
successors or assigns, hereinafter referred to as the "Board," parry of the second part.
:WITNESSETH:
THAT FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual benefits accruing to the parties,
the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Developer does hereby
GRANT, CONVEY, ASSIGN AND TRANSFER, with the covenants of GENERAL
WARRANTY OF TITLE, in fee simple unto the Board all water and/or sewer lines, valves,
fittings, laterals, connections, storage facilities, sources of water supply, pumps, manholes and
any and all other equipment and appurtenances thereunto belonging, in and to the water and/or
sewer systems in the streets, avenues, public utility, easement areas, water and sewer easement
areas that have been or may hereafter be installed by the Developer, along with the right to
perpetually use and occupy the easements in which the same may be located, all of which is more
particularly shown, described and designated as follows, to wit:
As shown on the plan entitled The Orchards Apartment Homes, made by Deep River
Engineering, PLLC and on file in the Roanoke County Department of Community
Development.
The Developer does hereby covenant and warrant that it will be responsible for the proper installation and
construction of the said water and/or sewer systems including repair of surface areas affected by settlement of
utility trenches for a period of one (1) year after date of acceptance by the Board and will perform any
necessary repairs at its cost.
Elmer C. Hodge, County Administrator of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby joins in the execution of this
instrument to signify the acceptance of this conveyance pursuant to Resolution No. adopted
by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, on the day of , 20
2
WITNESS THE FOLLOWING signatures and seals:
Developer: �,Pe /-/- C,
Address: A401 en nit eA Salfc i
9 RPM
Title
State of IiAc—
County/City of 64 t 4 r (A to wit:
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this:
day of 20-.
- r�A
By: i P —1 , NI 6 (A tA C Its 1 0, Ci 0, Ci C)
Duty authorized officer (typed name) Title
on behalf of on. rN 0 k e L -LC --
3
Approved as to form:
County Attorney
Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia
By: (SEAL)
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
State of: Virginia
County/City of: Roanoke , to wit:
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this:
, day of , 20
by Eimer C. Hodge, County Administrator, on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia.
Notary Public
My Commission expires:
0
boo
r,
.......
TQ RDAMDRE
-F-T-CINITY MAP'
ROANOE COUNTY ORCHARDS APARTMENT HOMES
UTILITY DEPARTMENT
Acceptance of Water and Sanitary Sewer facilities
A -072302-5.b
ACTION NO.
ITEM NUMBER:
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER
MEETING DATE: July 23, 2002
AGENDA ITEM: Bureau of Justice LLEBG Grant, October 1, 2002 until
September 30, 2004 Acceptance of the Bureau of Justice
Assistance block grant by the Police Department for law
enforcement support.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND:
The Roanoke County Police Department applied for a Bureau of Justice Assistance
(BJA) Grant to provide law enforcement support. The grant will be used to provide
funds for additional community policing efforts. The grant has been approved in the
amount of $32,132.00
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Local Law Enforcement Block Grant (LLEBG) is administered by the Bureau of
Justice Assistance. The purpose of the LLEBG program is to provide units of local
government with funds to underwrite projects to reduce crime and improve public
safety. The Police Department applied for funding and received approval.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The final award amount is $32,132.00 in federal funds that are to be matched with
$3,570 in Roanoke County funds. The local match will be provided from existing Police
Department funds.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends acceptance of the LLEBG grant funds from the Bureau of Justice
Assistance in the amount of $32,132.00.
SUBMITTED BY:
J. Ray Lavinder
Chief of Police
Approved (x)
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred ( )
To ( )
B 0j 20671 Wei
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
ACTION
Motion by: H. Odell Minnix to approve
cc: File
J. Ray Lavinder, Chief of Police
Danial Morris, Director, Finance
VOTE
No Yes Abs
Church _ x
Flora _ x
McNamara_ x _
Minnix _ x
Nickens x
A -072302-5.c
ACTION NO.
ITEM NUMBER:
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER
MEETING DATE: July 23, 2002
AGENDA ITEM: Request acceptance of a Bureau of Justice Assistance
Bulletproof Vest Partnership grant in the amount of
$10,689.82.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
BACKGROUND:
The Bureau of Justice Assistance, through Bulletproof Vest Partnership, assists local
law enforcement agencies in the purchase of bulletproof vests for sworn law
enforcement officers. The Bureau of Justice Assistance will pay for up to 50% of the
cost of bulletproof vests that are purchased by localities.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Roanoke County Police Department and the Roanoke County Sheriff's Office have
applied for and been approved to receive $10,689.82 in grant funds to assist in the
purchase of bulletproof vests. The Police Department requested reimbursement in the
amount of $9667.82 and the Sheriff's Office requested reimbursement in the amount of
$1,022.00. The total of the two reimbursement requests is the grant award of
$10,689.82. These funds will be available for expenditure through September 30, 2005
FISCAL IMPACT:
The grant provides 50% of the purchase costs of the bulletproof vests. No additional
matching funds are required from the County of Roanoke.
f
13
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The staff recommends acceptance of the Bureau of Justice Assistance Bulletproof Vest
Partnership grant in the amount of $10, 689.82.
SUBMITTED BY:
J. Ray Lavinder
Chief of Police
Approved (x)
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred ( )
To ( )
APPROVED:
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
ACTION
Motion by: H. Odell Minnix to approve
cc: File
J. Ray Lavinder, Chief of Police
Danial Morris, Director, Finance
VOTE
No Yes Abs
Church _ x _
Flora _ x _
McNamara_ x _
Minnix _ x _
Nickens x
A -072302-5.d
ACTION #
ITEM NUMBER
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: July 23, 2002
SUBJECT: Request to Accept Donation of Water Easement
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The "Plantation Grove" subdivision located in the Hollins magisterial district and developed by
DVW, Inc. was approved and accepted by Roanoke County in 1994. It has recently come to the
attention of Roanoke County Utility Department staff that portions of the public water system,
which serve the subdivision were installed on private property without the benefit of an
easement. This consent agenda item involves acceptance of the following easement for water
purposes to correct this oversight:
Plantation Grove — Water Easement
Donation of a water easement, of variable width, from Bryan E. Callaway and Amy S. Callaway
(Deed Book 1576, page 1156; Tax Map No. 40.13-04-09), as shown on a plat dated June 6,
2002, which was prepared by the Roanoke County Utility Department. A copy of the plat is
attached hereto as Exhibit "A". The easement was donated in conjunction with water lines and
appurtenances installed to serve the Plantation Grove Subdivision. The water line easement is
located along the northern shoulder of the cul-de-sac located at the northwestern end of
Plantation Grove Lane in the Hollins Magisterial District.
FISCAL IMPACT:
This easement is being donated by the referenced property owners and will have no fiscal
impact.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors accept the donation of this easement and
authorize the County Administrator to execute the subject deed of easement.
SUBMITTED BY:
Gary Robertson, P.E.
Utility Director
Approved (x)
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred ( )
To ( )
ACTION
Motion by: H. Odell Minnix to approve
cc: File
Gary Robertson, Director, Utility
Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development
APPROVED:
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
VOTE
No Yes Abs
Church _ x
Flora _ x _
McNamara_ x _
Minnix _ x _
Nickens x
NEW WATER
LINE
EASEMENT
LINE LENGTH
BEARING
1-2
45.05
N164821'E
2-3
50.39
N83 55'16 E
3-4
27.04
547'00'15"E
4-1
88.18
S70 05'42 "W
AREA =
744 S. F.
TAX PARCEL
,,{40.19-1-19
PROPERTY OF
ROY D. & if"6mr B.
BORON
P.B. 16, PG 126
CURVE TABLE
CURVE LENGTH RADIUS
Cl 102.31 55.00
nlf3li:101
1. TOTAL .AREA OF THE
1
NEW WA TER LINE
0
EASEMENT = 744 S, F.
Z
2. I T IS THE EXPRESS
G
INTENT OF THIS PLAT
DEED BOOK
TO CREA 7F THE NEW
WA TER LINE EASEMENT
PLA T BOOK
TO BE LOCA TED ON
TAX MAP PARCEL
PAGE
#40.13-4-9.
TAX PARCEL
/4(0.13-4-9
PROPERTY OF
BRP11V E. & AMY S.
CALL4rAY
1. B. 1576, P6. 1156
Jo• �o-
si.�� ASF
3
01
�0
1h�
LOT 6
PROPERTY OF
D VW, INC.
i ' \ P. B. 16, PG. 128
C1
LEGEND:
1
NEW WA TER
0
s .o c'j�-o-oo� a
sz o� <F
Z
LINENT�'�'
D.B.
DEED BOOK
EASEM
P.B.
PLA T BOOK
w
TAX PARCEL
/4(0.13-4-9
PROPERTY OF
BRP11V E. & AMY S.
CALL4rAY
1. B. 1576, P6. 1156
Jo• �o-
si.�� ASF
3
01
�0
1h�
LOT 6
PROPERTY OF
D VW, INC.
i ' \ P. B. 16, PG. 128
C1
LEGEND:
1
NEW WA TER
\ \
\\
LINENT�'�'
D.B.
DEED BOOK
EASEM
P.B.
PLA T BOOK
PG.
PAGE
P.U.E.
PUBLIC
U77LITY /
01�
�OL
EASEMENT
M.B.L.
MINIMUM
9J
BUILDING
LINE
S.F.
SQUARE
FEET
PLAT SHOWING
NEW WATER LINE EASEMENT
BEING GRANTED TO
THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE
BY
BRYAN E. & AMY S. CALLAWAY
ACROSS TAX MAP NO. 40.13-04-09
THIS PLAT IS FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE
OF CREATING A VARIABLE WIDTH WATER
LINE EASEMENT AS SHOWN HEREON
AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACTUAL
BOUNDARY SURVEY.
SCALE: 1 " = 40'
DATE: 6 JUN 2002
sjy
HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
ROANOKE COUNTY
UTILITY DEPARTMENT
SHEET 1 of 1 I
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 23, 2002
RESOLUTION 072302-6 CERTIFYING THE CLOSED MEETING WAS
HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened
a closed meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in
accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.2-3712 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by
the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such closed meeting was
conducted in conformity with Virginia law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members
knowledge:
1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting
requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the closed meeting which this
certification resolution applies, and
2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening
the closed meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia.
On motion of Supervisor Church to adopt the Certification resolution, and carried
by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Flora, McNamara, Nickens, Church
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Minnix
cc: File
Closed Meeting File
A COPY TESTE:
L�.JA' . a94')
Diane S. Childers
Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 23, 2002
RESOLUTION 072302-7 HONORING THE LATE MARY H. ALLEN,
FORMER CLERK TO THE BOARD, FOR CONTRIBUTIONS DURING
HER EIGHTEEN YEARS OF SERVICE TO ROANOKE COUNTY
WHEREAS, the late Mary H. Allen was first employed on March 5, 1984, as a
Clerk Steno II, and also served as Secretary II, Secretary III, Administrative Secretary
and Deputy Clerk before her appointment as Clerk to the Board on July 1, 1989; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Allen, who passed away on May 16, 2002, following a brief
illness, was greatly admired by her fellow co-workers and will be greatly missed by
everyone; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Allen served with great distinction in her capacity as Deputy
Clerk and Clerk to the Board of Supervisors for more than fourteen years, making many
significant contributions to that office including the improvement of citizen
communications by implementing the use of voice mail, e-mail, posting of information on
the County and Board websites, and broadcasting of Board meetings on Roanoke
Valley Television; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Allen used her creative writing talents by editing and publishing
the employee newsletter, the County Signal, and also assisted in the publication of the
first Citizens Handbook of Services in 1992; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Allen was responsible for planning and coordinating numerous
special events including Student Government Day; County Government Day; Investiture
Ceremonies; Dedication of Spring Hollow Reservoir; Co -Chair of the First Annual
11
County Clean Up Day; Design of the Roanoke County Afghan; Christmas Tree Lighting
Ceremonies; and special meetings for the Board of Supervisors; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Allen served on many committees including Chair of the March
through Time Y2000 Committee; Y2000 Celebration Committee; Employees Advisory
Committee; Special Events Committee; Volunteer Committee; Administration Center
Beautification Committee; and Secretary to the Roanoke Valley Regional Cable TV
Committee and the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Allen was appointed by the Board to serve on the Blue Ridge
Alliance for Organ and Tissue Donation Committee where, as Vice -Chair, she spoke at
the inaugural press conference and at a General Assembly subcommittee public
hearing; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Allen was a member of the International Institute of Municipal
Clerks and active in the Virginia Municipal Clerks Association (YMCA), earning the
designation of Certified Municipal Clerk in 1992 and Advanced Certification in 1998;
serving as Region IV Director several times, and Chairing the Clerk of the Year and
Scholarship Committees; and co -hosted the 1992 VMCA Annual Conference in
Roanoke.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia:
> That the Board does hereby express its sorrow at the death of Ms. Allen
and conveys its deepest sympathy to the members of her family; and
2
> That the Board does hereby express its sorrow at the death of Ms. Allen
and conveys its deepest sympathy to the members of her family; and
> That the Board wishes to honor Ms. Allen's memory and express its
gratitude for her many significant contributions to the County and the Board and for her
eighteen years of capable, loyal and dedicated service to the County; and
> That this resolution be presented to Ms. Allen's family with respect from
the Board, the County Administrator and County staff.
On motion of Supervisor McNamara to adopt the resolution, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Flora, McNamara, Nickens, Church
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Minnix
A COPY TESTE:
Diane S. Childers
Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Resolutions of Appreciation File
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANDKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, JULY 23, 2002
ORDINANCE 072302-8 AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 18-168,
"SCHEDULE OF CHARGES", OF CHAPTER 18 SEWERS AND SEWAGE
DISPOSAL, ARTICLE IV., "SEWER USE STANDARDS", OF THE
ROANOKE COUNTY CODE TO PROVIDE FOR AN INCREASE IN THE
BASE AND VOLUME CHARGES FOR SEWER SERVICE, AN INCREASE
IN THE SEWER OFF-SITE FACILITY FEE, AND THE IMPOSITION OF A
CHARGE PER EQUIVALENT RESIDENTIAL CONNECTION FOR
DEVELOPMENTS THAT WILL REQUIRE COUNTY MAINTENANCE OF A
SEWAGE PUMP STATION
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, has adopted and established
sewer user rates for Roanoke County utility customers, as provided in Roanoke County Code §18-168;
and,
WHEREAS, due to the anticipated costs of necessary improvements and upgrades at the
wastewater treatment facility, the Board of Supervisors has determined that an increase in sewer service
rates is required; and,
WHEREAS, the Board has determined that it is appropriate to make the adjustment of the sewer
charges through an increase in the base and volume charges for sewer service, and through an increase in
the off-site facilities fee; and,
WHEREAS, the Board has determined that it is necessary to impose a pump station maintenance
fee for new development to off -set the cost of maintaining sewage pump stations; and,
WHEREAS, the provisions of this ordinance for rate increases are adopted pursuant to the
authority found in Chapter 21, Title 15.2, more specifically §15.2-2111 and §15.2-2122 of the Code of
Virginia (1950, as amended) ; and,
1
WHEREAS, legal notice of these amendments has been published in a newspaper of general
circulation within Roanoke County, pursuant to §15.2-107 of the Code of Virginia (1950, as amended) on
July 2, 2002, and on July 9, 2002; and,
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on July 9, 2002, and the second reading
and public hearing on this ordinance was held on July 23, 2002.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia:
1. That Section 18-168, "Schedule of Charges", of Chapter 18 SEWERS AND SEWAGE
DISPOSAL, ARTICLE IV., "SEWER USE STANDARDS", is hereby amended and reenacted as follows:
Sec. 18-168. Schedule of charges.
(a) Persons discharging wastewater shall pay a charge to cover the capital cost and the cost of
collection and treatment of all wastewater discharged.
(1) All Class I users discharging normal wastewater or Group B wastewater shall pay a user
charge computed upon cost per volume of wastewater discharged.
(2) All Class II users discharging Group A wastewater shall have their user charge computed
upon a cost per unit volume basis for the base amount plus the unit cost of treatment for
all over the base amount for volume, biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), suspended
solids (SS), phosphorus (P) and total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN). In computing the
contaminant loading, the parameter concentrations for normal wastewater will be
considered as standard strength in determining the base amount in the effluent discharge
flow.
Initially, the responsibility for determining the contaminant loading for each category of
establishment will be that of the control authority. However, each establishment must verify its own
contaminant loading monthly by initiating a sampling and analytical program at its own expense and with
the approval of the control authority.
(b) The unit costs to be used to compute the charge for Class I and II users shall be
established by the approving authority. The unit costs for all users and the allowances for normal
wastewater for users may be revised as necessary to correspond to current costs and experience. Revisions
may be made, no more often than once a year, upon approval of the control authority. The user charge for
users shall be computed as follows:
Class I Users: Cu = Vu X Vd
2
Class II Users:
C8 = Vd + VsVc + BsBc + SsSc + PsPc + NsNc
And:
Cu = Charge for Class I users
Cs = Charge for Class II users
Vu = Unit cost of treatment chargeable to normal wastewater ($/1,000 gal.)
Vd = Volume of wastewater from normal wastewater (1,000 gals)
Vs = Volume of Class II wastewater (1,000 gals) in excess of Class I wastewater
Vc = Cost of treating 1,000 gals. of Class II wastewater ($/1,000 gal.)
Bs = Class II wastewater BOD contribution in excess of Class I wastewater limit (lbs.)
Bc = Cost of treating Class II BOD contribution ($/lb.)
Ss = Class II wastewater SS contribution in excess of Class I wastewater limit (lbs.)
Sc = Cost of treating Class II SS contribution ($/lb.)
Ps = Class II wastewater phosphorus contribution in excess of Class I wastewater limit (lbs.)
Ns = Class II wastewater unoxidized nitrogen contribution in excess of Class I wastewater limit (lbs.)
Nc = Cost of treating Class II phosphorus contribution ($/lb.)
(c) The following schedule of base charges and volume charges for residential, commercial
and industrial customers of the county shall apply for sewer service. The volume charge per one thousand
(1,000) gallons will be based on water used. The volume charge is added to the base charge to determine
the total sewer bill.
SCHEDULE OF BASE CHARGES
Volume Based
SEWER RATES
Water Supplied BASE CHARGE PER MONTH
1000 Gallons Effective E4cct
Per Month 9-1-2002 X904
3
0--10
$ 8.31
$ 9.00
b
11--14
12.47
13.51
15--17
20.78
22.52
0
18--28
34.56
37.39
40:51
29--39
48.20
52.23
5frf�
40--54
66.49
72.05
55--69
-85.66
92.76
i 08.52
70--111
138.37
149.94
162.48
112--153
191.15
207.14
224.46
154--210
262.2
284.13
307-89
211--267
333.2
361.13
391.33
268--440
548.92
594.8.3
644.56
441--613
�64.58
828.52
8980
614--853
1,063.77
1,152.73
1,249.12
854--1,093
1362.96
1,476.94
- i
1,094--1,400
1,74335
1,891.21
-x,049.34
1,401--1,707
2,1H.54
2,305.47
2,498.25
1,708--2,087
2,601.26
2,818.80
3,054.f
2,088--2,467
3,074.96
3,332.12
-3,610.7-5
Volume Charge
Per 1000 Gallons
$-4,48
1.52
4-64
(d) Connection fees. The total sewer connection fee shall consist of costs and considerations
associated with (I) a basic connection fee; (ii) an off-site facilities fee; arrd (iii) a pump station
maintenance fee; and (iv) an off-site and oversized line credit policy:
(1) Basic connection fee. The basic connection fee for all applicants is to recover the cost of
the service connection or service tap. The basic connection fee shall be assessed all
connectors and the payment shall accompany the application for connection to the sewer
system.
(2) Off-site facilities fee. The off-site facilities fee for all applicants is to recover the cost of all
present and future capital facilities and improvements to the sewer system constructed by
or on behalf of the county. Up to one-half of the off-site facilities fee will be subject to the
off-site and oversized line credit policy. The off-site facilities fee shall be assessed all
connectors and the payment shall accompany the application for connection to an
existing or proposed establishment of a sewer system.
(3) Pump station maintenance fee. The pump station maintenance fee is to recover the
additional costs associated with county maintenance of a sewage pump station, including
but not limited to daily monitoring, electrical expenses, and periodic replacement of
pumps and other equipment. The pump station maintenance fee shall be assessed all
connectors to be served by a sewage pump station maintained or to be maintained by the
county and the payment shall accompany the application. for connection to an existing or
proposed establishment of a sewer system.
4
(4) Off-site and oversized line credit policy. A credit will be allowed against the off-site
facilities fee for off-site extensions of a sewer line in excess of three hundred (300) feet
and/or installation of line size in excess of minimum line size required by the county. For
any off-site extensions in a public right-of-way or easement adjacent to the
owner's/applicant's property, credit will be allowed against the off-site facilities fee only for
sewer line size in excess of the minimum diameter required by the county. No credit will
be allowed where a line size greater than the minimum diameter size is required to
adequately serve the owner/applicant. Credits shall be limited to a maximum of twenty-
five (25) percent of the amount assessed for the off-site facilities fee and are subject to
funds being appropriated and available for credits within the sewer off-site facilities fee
fund. Credits shall be computed based upon the most recent bids received by the county
for construction of similar sewer facilities.
(,}5) The board of supervisors may authorize the utility director to enter into a reimbursement
agreement with an owner/applicant for off-site facilities which may be required by the
county, and which are not addressed by the off-site and oversized line credit policy.
(56) The total connection fee shall be paid as follows: twenty-five (25) percent at time of plan
approval, seventy-five (75) percent (balance) upon the earlier of either the application for
building permit or prior to occupancy or sewer use by the facility. When the off-site
facilities fee is increased, the applicant may pay the remaining balance of the prior fee
before the effective date of the new fee. Thereafter, the remaining balance shall be
calculated on the fee that exists at the time the balance is paid.
(e) Installation payments. Any landowner may, at his option, request in writing on forms
provided by the county, to be allowed to snake payment on the off-site facilities fee portion of the
connection fee, in thirty-six (36) monthly installments, provided that:
(1) The amount of such fee shall be increased by twenty (20) percent.
(2) The landowner shall execute a contract with the county for aforesaid installment payment
a note evidencing such obligation in a form approved by the county attorney setting forth
the amount and number of payments to be made together with other such terms and
conditions deemed necessary and appropriate by the parties thereto. Such contract shall
be recorded in the office of the clerk of circuit court of the county.
(3) The county shall have the right to collect such payments in the same manner as provided
for collection of sewer service charges together with other means as set out in the sewer
contract.
(4) Such note shall be paid in full prior to the transfer of title to any land for which sewer
service was provided, and if the same are not paid in full by the date of transfer, the
county shall have the right to discontinue service and remove all of its facilities and
require payment of the full amount of the connection fees prevailing at that time, as if
service had never been installed
5
(f) Authority of board of supervisors to waive connection fees:
(1) The board of supervisors may, by resolution, waive a portion of the connection fees for
sewer facilities installed under federal or state funded sewer projects. The portion of the
fee that is waived shall be indicated as county financial participation in the sewer project.
(2) The board of supervisors may, by resolution, authorize all or a portion of the off-site
facilities fee to be paid from the general fund for those commercial or industrial owners
(applicants) which the board of supervisors determines would be in the best interest of the
county's economic development and which would generate significant employment.
(g) Minimum connection fee. The minimum connection fee for any connection will be that
established for a five -eighths -inch water meter.
(h) Schedule of connection fees. The total connection fee is the sum of the basic connection
fee (which is based upon sewer service to one equivalent residential connection or "ERC") plus the off-site
facilities fee (which is determined by ERC, type of service and effective date), as indicated in Tables I and
II, and the pump station maintenance fee, if applicable.
Basic Connection Fee: The basic connection fee is one hundred dollars ($100.00) and includes Roanoke
County personnel installing the physical tap to the sewer main after excavation by the customer.
Table I
Off-site Facilities Fee
Type of Service •Effeztivr Effevtive
9-i-94 9-i-95
Single family & multifamily
(per dwelling unit) +7800- X569
(Pei gUeSt locn+ - 500 -508
iia • —508 _FA
-.•_, -- I
—508 --7-50
Table II
Effective.
9-1-2002
2,000
The Off-site Facilities Fee for Aall other applicants basinesses, indtisnial and public buildings will be based
on meter size as follows.
Water Meter EJ-frctive
Size (inches) ERC 91 i 194
C
Effective
9.1-"2002
3/8 1.00 $i'000.0 $1500.06 $2,000.00
3/4 1.44 1,440.08 2,160.00 2,880.00
1 2.56 2,560.00 3,840.00 5,120.00
1 '/2 5.76 5,760.00 8,640.00 11,520.00
2 10.24 10,240.00 15,360.06 20,480.00
3 23.04 23,040.00 34,560.0 46,080.00
4 40.96 40;960.0 61440.00 81,920.00
6 92.16 92,160.0 138,240:00 184,320.00
8 63.84 163,840 00 345 60.00 327,680.00
10 256.00 256,000.00 384,000.00 51.2,000.00
12 368.64 368,640.00 552960-0 737,280.00
Pump Station Maintenance Fee: The pump station maintenance fee is five hundred dollars ($500.00) per
one equivalent residential connection or "ERC' served or to be served by a sewage pump station that
requires or will require County maintenance.
(I) The director of finance is authorized to adjust utility charges arising from filling swimming
pools with water when such water is not introduced into the sanitary sewer system. Any such adjustment
shall be limited to once per year, and be for sewer charges only. The director of finance may promulgate
regulations to implement this adjustment procedure.
(j) For those customers that are sewer customers only and do not have water meters, sewer is
billed at an estimated usage of thirty thousand (30,000) gallons per month for commercial customers and
eighteen thousand (18,000) gallons per quarter for residential service. Such rates or charges shall be based
on the schedule of charges established in this ordinance.
thousand dollats ($1,000.00) effective September 1, i994, and shall incieuse to
(2) For sffiglc-f�trrily luts of tecard on WhiCh MCIIty-fiVC (25) Percent Of tile
Mibtitlg fCC has beCLI paid before the effective date of this Utdirran", dir
hULLdled dollars ($500.00) '-UIILICC6UIL fCC ULL UI before Atigast 31, 1995. 1
7
(k)* The provisions of this ordinance, and the rates and fees established hereby, shall be
effective from and after September l., 2002 }aly i,1994
2. That transition shall be handled administratively by the Utility Director in accordance
with the implementation policy provided by report to the Board. Any appeal of an administrative decision
of the Utility Director under this policy shall be to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County.
3. That all subsections and provisions of §18-168 of the Roanoke County Code, not
specifically amended herein, shall remain in full force and effect.
4. That the provisions of this ordinance and the rates established hereby shall be effective on
and from the date of adoption.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance but withhold the second 8.26% increase
scheduled to take effect on January 1, 2004, with the understanding that staff will provide appropriate
notice if an additional increase is necessary, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Flora, McNamara, Nickens, Church
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Minnix
l*1
...
.-.
....
..
..WKWAEVIUM...
(k)* The provisions of this ordinance, and the rates and fees established hereby, shall be
effective from and after September l., 2002 }aly i,1994
2. That transition shall be handled administratively by the Utility Director in accordance
with the implementation policy provided by report to the Board. Any appeal of an administrative decision
of the Utility Director under this policy shall be to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County.
3. That all subsections and provisions of §18-168 of the Roanoke County Code, not
specifically amended herein, shall remain in full force and effect.
4. That the provisions of this ordinance and the rates established hereby shall be effective on
and from the date of adoption.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance but withhold the second 8.26% increase
scheduled to take effect on January 1, 2004, with the understanding that staff will provide appropriate
notice if an additional increase is necessary, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Flora, McNamara, Nickens, Church
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Minnix
l*1
A COPY TESTE:
1A10 �k j
Diane S. Childers
Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Gary Robertson, Director, Utility
Danial Morris, Director, Finance
Circuit Court
Clifford R. Weckstein, Judge
Diane McQ. Strickland, Judge
Robert P. Doherty, Jr., Judge
Jonathan M. Apgar, Judge
James R. Swanson, Judge
Steven A. McGraw, Clerk
Juvenile Domestic Relations District Court
Joseph M. Clarke, II, Judge
Philip Trompeter, Judge
John B. Ferguson, Judge
Joseph P. Bounds, Judge
Ruth P. Bates, Clerk
Intake Counsellor
General District Court
George W. Harris, Judge
William Broadhurst, Judge
Vincent Lilley, Judge
Julian H. Raney, Judge
Jacqueline F. Ward Talevi, Judge
Theresa A. Childress, Clerk
Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
Magistrates Sherri Krantz/Betty Perry
Main Library
Ray Lavinder, Police Chief
Richard Burch, Chief of Fire & Rescue
Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke 24016
Roanoke County Law Library, Singleton Osterhoudt
Roanoke County Code Book
Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff
John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator
Dan O'Donnell, Assistant County Administrator
Diane D. Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer
O. Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development
Janet Scheid, Chief Planner
David Davis, Court Services
Elaine Carver, Director, Information Technology
Anne Marie Green, Director, General Services
Thomas S. Haislip, Director, Parks, Recreation & Tourism
William E. Driver Director, Real Estate Valuation
Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer
Nancy Horn, Commissioner of Revenue
9
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, JULY 23, 2002
ORDINANCE 072302-9 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT
TO CALVARY CHAPEL ROANOKE TO OPERATE A
RELIGIOUS FACILITY ON 3.48 ACRES LOCATED AT 2067A
ELECTRIC ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 76.07-4-33), WINDSOR
HILLS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
WHEREAS, Calvary Chapel Roanoke has filed a petition for a special use permit to
operate a religious facility located at 2067A Electric Road (Tax Map No. 76.07-4-33) in
the Windsor Hills Magisterial District; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on July
2, 2002; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first
reading on this matter on June 25, 2002; the second reading and public hearing on this
matter was held on July 23, 2002.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to Calvary
Chapel Roanoke to operate a religious facility located at 2067A Electric Road (Tax Map
No. 76.07-4-33) in the Windsor Hills Magisterial District is substantially in accord with the
adopted 2000 Community Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.2-2232 of the 1950 Code
of Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved.
2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this
ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to
1
amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by
this ordinance.
On motion of Supervisor McNamara to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Flora, McNamara, Nickens, Church
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Minnix
A COPY TESTE:
Diane S. Childers
Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development
Janet Scheid, Chief Planner
William E. Driver, Director, Real Estate Valuation
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
2
yr
�e
SStia
G�
ROANOKE COUNTY Applicants name: Calvary Chapel
DEPARTMENT OF Application: SUP
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tax Map No. 76.07-4-33
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 23, 2002
ORDINANCE 072302-10 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO ST.
FRANCIS OF ASSISI TO OPERATE A COMMERCIAL KENNEL ON
18.16 ACRES LOCATED AT 8232 ENON DRIVE (TAX MAP NO. 18.17-
2-22), HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
WHEREAS, St. Francis of Assisi has filed a petition for a special use permit to
operate a commercial kennel on 18.16 acres located at 8232 Enon Drive (Tax Map No.
18.17-2-22) in the Hollins Magisterial District; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on
July 2, 2002; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, held a first
reading on this matter on June 25, 2002; the second reading and public hearing on this
matter was held on July 23, 2002.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That the Board finds that the granting of a special use permit to St. Francis
of Assisi to operate a commercial kennel on 18.16 acres located at 8232 Enon Drive
(Tax Map No. 18.17-2-22) in the Hollins Magisterial District is substantially in accord
with the adopted 2000 Community Plan pursuant to the provisions of § 15.2-2232 of the
1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and said Special Use Permit is hereby approved
with the following condition:
(1) No vehicular access shall be permitted from Buckland Mill Road.
2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
1
final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this
ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed
to amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized
by this ordinance.
On motion of Supervisor Flora to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Flora, McNamara, Nickens, Church
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Minnix
A COPY TESTE:
16, � Q I j , a R04�
Diane S. Childers
Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development
Janet Scheid, Chief Planner
William E. Driver, Director, Real Estate Valuation
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
2
I 51
14.
ROANOKE COUNTY Applicants name: St. Francis of Assisi
DEPARTMENT OF Application: SUP
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Existing Zoning: AR
Tarr Mazy No. 4-7,2,2---2--22