The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About5/11/2004 - Adopted Board RecordsACTION N0. A-051104-1 ITEM NO. F-1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 11, 2004 AGENDA ITEM: Request to appropriate $1,820,000 for the Community Policy and Management Team (CPMT) to provide funding for mandated services for youth with special needs SUBMITTED BY: John M. Chambliss, Jr. Assistant County Administrator APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Community Policy and Management Team (CPMT) is requesting an additional appropriation of $1,820,000 to cover the required expenses for FY 2003-04. Following the public hearing at today's meeting, staff respectfully requests the recognition of $1,000,000 new revenue from the State and an appropriation of $820,000 from the unappropriated fund balance of the general fund to cover the required expenses for this year. The new amounts have been included in the budget requests for the upcoming fiscal year. In 1992, the State implemented the Comprehensive Services Act (GSA) to become the funding source for youth with special needs and their families which had previously been funded by the Schools, Juvenile Court, and Social Services. The plan uses a collaborative effort to consider the identified needs of the child (Special Education for the Schools; Foster Care for Social Services; youth with charges before the Juvenile Court) to reduce the likelihood of duplicating or conflicting services and to seek cost effective means of educating or treating the child. There are many factors which must be considered in determining the status as a mandated service (whereby for Roanoke County, the State pays 56% and the locality pays 44%) or a non -mandated service where there is a shared match for the first $125,000 per year, and then any service is paid 100% by the locality. There are also some specialized and grant funds for certain qualified youth, but these also have limitations. As children with needs are identified, they are assigned a case manager who serves as the child's advocate and presents the needs to the Family Assessment and Planning Team (FAPT). This collaborative team is comprised of senior workers from the Departments of Health, Social Services, Schools, Court Services, a private provider of children services, and parent advocates. They listen to the identified needs and help to formulate a treatment plan based on their experience and knowledge of available programs. The treatments are aimed at providing the least restrictive conditions first with the aim of keeping the child in the home and community. Sometimes, the severity of need is greater than services in the home can manage and residential treatment programs are required. The goal is always to reunite the family and to provide the support services needed to allow the education and stabilization of the child. Frequently, this requires a combination of services which are decreased as the conditions improve. In cases where certain treatments are not effective, alternatives are considered. The CPMT is comprised of the directors of the core departments and other designated disciplines and they collaborate to approve funding and authorize treatment. The team also considers the utilization review to determine if the treatment goals are being accomplished. In many cases, the treatment extends over several years. In other cases such as foster care, the care may extend until the child is eighteen years old. Over the past few years as many of the service providers have attempted to become Medicaid providers, the overall cost of purchasing these services has increased dramatically, thus driving up the cost of the program. Children are being identified earlier and the presenting symptoms are more severe than in the past. Much of the increase for service is attributed to substance abuse, mental health issues, family dysfunction and domestic violence. As an example, over the last ten years the number of foster care cases handled by Social Services has grown from 35 per year to over 105 today. In instances where no other treatment monies are available to aid the child, the courts have placed the child under the umbrella of Social Services to qualify them for services. Some of the cases have minor costs for counseling, mentoring services, etc.; however, some of the severe placements in residential treatment facilities may cost nearly $200,000 per year far a child. In contrast, the family represented by one high dollar residential placement has moved out of Roanoke County which resulted in a savings for the current year. Attached is a listing of the cases for the current fiscal year and the projection of costs to be incurred by the CPMT. You will note that one child and family who had been placed in a residential treatment facility have moved from Roanoke County. The savings from this action have been calculated in this program. I FISCAL IMPACT: This fiscal year, the local share (match) for the program was budgeted at $1,153,000. However, based on current cases, it is anticipated that the deficit for the year will be $1,819,678. The share from the State will be $1,000,000 and $820,000 from local sources. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: As this request covers mandated cases, staff recommends that the Board authorize the appropriation of $1,820,000 in new money to the CPMT for FY 2003-04. Of this amount, $1,000,000 would be new State revenues and $820,000 would be taken from the unappropriated balance of the general fund for the local share. VOTE: Supervisor McNamara motion to approve staff recommendation Motion Approved cc: File John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator Diane Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer Rebecca Owens, Director, Finance Dr. Betty McCrary, Director, Social Services Dr. Linda Weber, Schools Superintendent Brenda Chastain, Clerk to School Board David Davis, Court Services 3 Yes No Absent Mr. McNamara ® ❑ ❑ Mr. Church ❑ ❑ Mr. Wray ® ❑ ❑ Mr. Altizer ® ❑ ❑ Mr. Flora ® ❑ ❑ cc: File John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator Diane Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer Rebecca Owens, Director, Finance Dr. Betty McCrary, Director, Social Services Dr. Linda Weber, Schools Superintendent Brenda Chastain, Clerk to School Board David Davis, Court Services 3 CPMT Funding Current allocations and expenses (Net of Refunds) Carry over expenses from prior year Estimated cost of new expenses for May and June Projected Expenses FY 03 - 04 Revenues: Refunds State Share budgeted Local transfers budgeted (from School and County) Deficit State Share Local Share Actual 03 - 04 Amounts 3,899,577 32,232 103,000 60,000 1,002,131 1,153, 000 4,034,809 2,215,131 1,819,678 1,000,000 820,000 Roanoke County CPMT FY04 projections as of 3/30/04 _ total type of projected;:.`:: funding current placementexpenditu res :;;:::; res FC left FC 10/15/03 J. 6,020.00 x ix ixx spec ed day treatment FFC left FC 11/18/03 2,897.41:::;;`::: spec ed res Meridell 21,550.00:.; spec ed Minnick 11,600.00 <x FFC DSS foster home 2,305.60 xx><x> FCP = foster care prevention spec ed res Grafton 172,078.38>adop subsidy =educational costs in TFC Connections 17,676.50 xx a placement pd for by spec ed Rivermont 27,122.68`::; adoption subsidy spec edMinnick 21,600.00>xres FC = residential foster"care spec ed Achievement Ctr 6,055.20::.;:;: ind liv = independent living FFC DSS foster home 1,600.00 FFC = family foster care spec ed Rivermont 12,689.00 :;.;:;TFC = therapeutic foster care FC indep living 41,877.03;<`xspec ed - res = special ed, residential TFC DePaul Fam Sery 13,185.94>x sped ed = special ed, non residential TFC DePaul Fam Sery 15,689.42::>`:` NON -NON = non mandated, non residential res FC Whisper Ridge62,533.32::`;;:: NON -RES = non mandated, residential TFC DePaul Fam Sery 12,502.44':.xxxx?x TFC DePaul Fam Sery 12,504.04> res FC Tekoa 54,913.94 x<xx Spec ed res Meridell 35,250.00 `... spec ed beh specialist 8,820.00:;::?xi res FC STARS 38,009.51 xxx Spec ed Minnick 21,600.00;`.>. spec ed res Bridges 79,612.50;x:;:;; non -non mentoring 2,835.00 res FC New Hope 122,633.89<' res FC went home 2/12 27,228.57;>=x spec ed Minnick 21,600.00x> spec ed Rivermont 24,120.00;;;::;;. spec ed Rivermont 24,120.WO x€ spec ed Minnick 15;840.00 res FC Elk Hill 35,452.94>«! adop subsidy Tekoa 30,687.00x;:;; TFC DePaul Fam Sery 18,411.46:::;`; TFC" DePaul Fam Sery 11,448.42 xx x TFC DePaul Fam Sery 15,111.46x;<< res FC VBCH 21,010.00x:::::::: TFC spec ed DePaul Fam Sery Achievement Ctr 12,572.00;;:;; res FC VBCH ind liv DePaul Fam Sery 12,914.64;:;x;:::: spec ed Minnick 21,600.00:;;::x; FFC out of custody 2/25 2,925.00;::;><' TFC DePaul Fam Sery 26,357.95> TFC DePaul Fam Sery 32,353.63 xxxx TFC DePaul Fam Sery 24,382.10'xx res FC Va Tx Center 75,430.75 x<xxx adop subsidy The Pines 26,696.28x«> TFC DePaul Fam Sery 19,212.84;:x:;;;; TFC DePaul Fam Sery 31,079.04x>'x'< TFC DePaul Fam Sery 30,917.28:x; x Roanoke County CPMT FY04 projections as of 3/30/04 _ total type of projected;;::; funding current placement expenditures ;`;:;< FFC DSS foster home 10,536.00::::>° FFC DSS foster home 13,166.00:::: res FC Poplar Springs 47,278.00xx`l res FC New Dominion 34,452.00:;:;;;:; FFC DSS foster home 2,178.95 FFC DSS foster home 2,103.00;:;:;:; FFC out of custody 11/3 3,228.55:< spec ed Minnick 21,600.00:::::::;: res FC Elk Hill 49,663.06:::::;::: mentoring DePaul Fam Sery 1,745.30:;;:;; spec ed res transferred 3/4 112,256.90:::..,.. spec ed day treatment 10,710.00:::::::: non -non life skills ment 575.00:;;;;;::; spec ed Rivermont 24,120.00 <: FFC home 3/1 14,039.84:;;;:; res FC VBCH 9,203.00::;>::i: TFC home 8/15 713.60!;:;;;:; TFC home 8/15 1,520.00;:x:::::: TFC home 2/20 4,555.54:;:;; TFC home 2/20 8,411.€< FFC out of custody 2/4 5,736.54:;;;`:: FFC out of custody 10/29 6,486.51:. TFC Connections 34,331.46:`:::;:; res FC Bridges XX. 145,494.00 TFC Connections 33,624.00;;;;:; res FC Tekoa 78,516.01 TFC, FFC home 6,611.93 res FC home 8/14 17,300.41;;;::: TFC adopt home 8/29 2,038.14':< non -res New Dominion 41,536.00`::;::> non -non sery end 12/03 31137.50::::::: TFC AWOL since 9/19 2.594.74 is > TFC Connections 30,883.84:;>`: spec ed AC summer school 373.50;:;:;:;: spec ed res Benedictine 73,623.40;':';;:; res FC VBCH 44,379.50;::;;;; FCP, spec ed day treatment, ment 19,441.05:":„? res FC Bridges 23,307.00;:;;;::; FFC adopt home 3/11 1,080.00:::;::::: FFC home FFC home 584.14:::::::: FFC home 585.13 non -res, spec ed home 9/30 16,679.50> adop subsidy home 11/3 4,375.00:>:::;: spec ed beh specialist 11,505.00:::::::: spec ed Rivermont 24,120.00::::;;:;: res FC home 12/8 80,615.00; spec ed day treatment 10,710.00`:;:;'::::; ind liv ended 1/15 17,141,43 spec ed Rivermont 21,306.00;:::;'::: res FC Tekoa 36,750.00;::;::: FFC DSS foster home Roanoke County CPMT FY04 projections as of 3130104 ----------- total---- type of projected funding current placement expenditures::':; spec ed FFC ended 11/1 out of custody 11/3 2,880.00;::; 4,667. TFC spec ed ec ed in non -re E Connections Rivermont home 32,766.7 24,120.00ii�i: 2,250.00 res FC Coastal Harbor 150 950,65 spec ed spec ed spec ed FCP Minnick Rivermont day treatment ended 15,761. 26,020.00 ;i� 15,638.55 5,817.50 ::i TFC TFC DePaul Farn Sery DePaul Fam Sery 22,730.81 28,912. FFC DSS foster home 10,426.33 TFC DePaul Farn Sery 21,924.08:,:, FFC DSS foster home 19,226. FFC DSS foster home 17,376.00,'.-'..'.' pec ed res FC day treatment out of custody 11/6 20547.0 20,977.78;; Spec ed pec ed spec ed Spec ed Rivermont day treatment Rivermont Minnick % 23,450.00::::, 22,183.16 24,120.00 21,600.00" res FC TFO The Pines DePaul Farn Sery 36,716.01 10 041.24:: pec ed Rivermont 15,276.00;: res FC Grafton 56,439.7 TFC Connections 26,798.06'; spec ed res discharged 9/30 26,138.00:. pec ed Rivermont 24,120.00 - spec ed transferred 3/19 16,616.00:: res FC Poplar Springs 69,916.00:: FFC DSS foster home 5,502.00:: spec ed Minnick 21,600.00: res FC Grafton 55,907.95 spec ed Rivermont 24,120.00 res FC. Elk Hill 111,869.55 spec ed Minnick 2-1.600.00 FFC DSS foster home 21129.27 FFC. DSS foster home 3,919.52 TFC Braley & Thompson 26,374.90 res FC Cherokee Park 35,397.81 ped spec BRBH day treatment* 154,675.09 serves 10-12 students TOTAL—$3,899,577 P, �-N AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 11, 2004 RESOLUTION 051104-2 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM K - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for May 11, 2004, designated as Item K - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 5, inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of minutes — April 21 and 27, 2004 2. Confirmation of committee appointments to the Roanoke Valiey-Alleghany Regional Commission, Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission, and Social Services Advisory Board 3. Request to accept Meadow Springs Circle, a portion of Spring Grove Drive and a portion of Fountain Lane into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System 4. Request to accept Montague Way into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System 5. Acceptance of the donation of certain real estate for entrance improvements to the Vinton Business Center, Vinton Magisterial District, from Richard Lirnroth and Kelly B. Limroth 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Wray to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Wray, Altizer, Flora NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Church A COPY TESTE/:, &4194-1 a Brenda J. Holton, CMC Deputy Clerk cc: File Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Janet Scheid, Chief Planner Doug Chittum, Director, Economic Development William Driver, Director, Real Estate Assessment 2 ACTION NO. A -051104-2.a ITEM NO. K-2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 11, 2004 AGENDA ITEM: Confirmation of committee appointments to the Roanoke Valley -Alleghany Regional Commission, Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission, and Social Services Advisory Board SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: Diane S. Childers Clerk to the Board Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: At the April 27, 2004, meeting, the following nominations were made: ROANOKE VALLEY-ALLEGHANY REGIONAL COMMISSION Pursuant to the Board's discussion in closed session, Dean Martin has been nominated to serve on this committee. He will complete the unexpired three-year term of the late Mr. Eddy, as well as an additional three-year term. His term will expire on June 30, 2007. ROANOKE VALLEY GREENWAY COMMISSION Supervisor Flora nominated Richard Kelly to serve an additional three-year term which will expire on April 8, 2007. SOCIAL SERVICES ADVISORY BOARD Supervisor Flora nominated Dot Hayes to complete the unexpired portion of the four-year term of Patricia W. Thompson, Hollins Magisterial District, who has resigned. This term will expire on August 1, 2005. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the above appointments be confirmed. VOTE: Supervisor Wray motion to approve staff recommendation Motion Approved cc: File Roanoke Valley -Alleghany Regional Commission Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission Social Services Advisory Board FA Yes No Absent Mr. McNamara ® ❑ ❑ Mr. Church ❑ ❑ Mr. Wray ® ❑ ❑ Mr. Altizer ® ❑ ❑ Mr. Flora ® ❑ ❑ cc: File Roanoke Valley -Alleghany Regional Commission Roanoke Valley Greenway Commission Social Services Advisory Board FA THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, IN REGULAR MEETING ON THE 11th DAY OF MAY, 2004, ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING: RESOLUTION 051104-2.b REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF MEADOW SPRINGS CIRCLE, A PORTION OF SPRING GROVE DRIVE, AND A PORTION OF FOUNTAIN LANE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM. WHEREAS, the streets described on the attached Addition Form SR -5(A), fully incorporated herein by reference, are shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, and WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised this Board the streets meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation, WHEREAS, the County and the Virginia Department of Transportation have entered into an agreement on March 9, 1999 for comprehensive stormwater detention which applies to this request for addition, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets described on the attached Additions Form SR -5(A) to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right- of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote Moved by: Supervisor Wray Seconded by: None Required Yeas: Supervisors, McNamara, Wray, Altizer, Flora Nays: None Absent: Supervisor Church A Copy Teste: Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: Arnold Covey, Director, Department of Community Development Virginia Department of Transportation File I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Resolution 051104-2.b adopted by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors by a unanimous recorded vote with Supervisor Church absent on Tuesday, May 11, 2004. Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Z W Z r C w O z O P LL Q LU U O O N O v < v O O O O c CD E h L U ttY r_; Q U W 8 z i O � U U Q U a v �O Ln u 1 � y � O O� I c d a CL a na a 00 e cL m yp ID w y 1 L � cD O E 6 O D 6 O O 0 O 0 c O a i r na w r- a � r a� r a� f- Q Q � G N U ^ ZP7:1 U �N N y o C e C7 H H Ch H 3 < Z z Cali � � , ••. U W n m Q O � z N' n fo Z W Z r C w O z O P LL Q LU U O •�$ / r `i 1 ---•�~ fAL � n 5 33;•F.07� ro srewaerswuE ti 5 ROVE pR 4 —.._ �.. k �% RTC. . SECrION I u / THE HILLS OF /! ,I SPRING GROVE VICINITY MAP' Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Deed Book 1439, Pg 67 •. The Bills of Spring Grove, Section 1 PROPOSED ADDITION SHOWN IN GRAS' I CiAIYQF E, COUNTY The Hills of Spring Grove, Section 1 -ROA�R3'EL�'11�7' UAcceptance of Meadow Springs Circle, a portion of Spring Grove Drive and a portion of Fountain Lane into co MMET1VIT DE.V.13,'LOPME'N.i The Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System LENGTH RIGHT OF WAY ROADWAY WIDTH SERVICES] DESCRIPTION Miles Feet Feet Houses Spring Grove Drive from its cul-de-sac (VA. Sec. Rte.#673) D.04 60 44 3+ 0,04 miles to the north Spring Grove Drive from 0.04 miles north of cul-de-sac 0.04 60 44 3+ (VA Sec Rte # 67 3 to intersection with Fountain Lane 36 15 Fountain Lane from the intersection of Spring Grove Drive 0.22 50 to the intersection; of Meadow S ginas Circle 30 6 Meadow Springs.Circle from the. intersection of 0,04 50 I CiAIYQF E, COUNTY The Hills of Spring Grove, Section 1 -ROA�R3'EL�'11�7' UAcceptance of Meadow Springs Circle, a portion of Spring Grove Drive and a portion of Fountain Lane into co MMET1VIT DE.V.13,'LOPME'N.i The Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, IN REGULAR MEETING ON THE 11TH DAY OF MAY, 2004, ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING: RESOLUTION 051104-2.c REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF MONTAGUE WAY INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM WHEREAS, the street described on the attached Addition Form SR -5(A), fully incorporated herein by reference are shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, and WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation has advised this Board the streets meet the requirements established by the Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation, WHEREAS, the County and the Virginia Department of Transportation have entered into an agreement on March 9, 1999 for comprehensive stormwater detention which applies to this request for addition, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets described on the attached Additions Form SR -5(A) to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted right- of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be forwarded to the resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Recorded Vote Moved by: Supervisor Wray Seconded by: None Required Yeas: Supervisors, McNamara, Wray, Altizer, Flora Nays: None Absent: Supervisor Church A Copy Teste: Q, alk= Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: Arnold Covey, Director, Department of Community Development Virginia Department of Transportation File I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Resolution 051104-2.c adopted by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors by a unanimous recorded vote with Supervisor Church absent on Tuesday, May 11, 2004. Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors 0 E a METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT REPRESENT A COMPOSITE OF DEEDS, PLATS, AND CALCULATED INFORMATION AND DO NOT REFLECT AN ACCURATE BOUNDARY SURVEY. 4 3 5389 2 5387 1 5371 5355 6396 s `� 1.�i rx" Homewood Cr Qo 6345 20 6 6369 639 9A 10 77 12 6350631 6360 6370 6396 s `� 1.�i rx" Homewood Cr Qo 6345 20 6 6369 639 18 17 0 6397 10A 1.53 Ac. 1 � 16A / 1.52 Ac. -----____..______-_______-_____-___._.___.______ 5420 18 5975 5981 17 5980 21.19 Ac. D 5974 17.90 Ac. C 1.56 Ac. TAX MAP N0._-86_03 50' R/W 5449 Length: 0.1845 Miles No. of Homes Served: 12 -------- SCALE:__ PLAT SHOWING Aceceptance of Montague Way into the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System PREPARED BY: ROANOKE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE. 4-30-04 ACTION NO. A -051104-2.d ITEM NO. K-5 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: May 11, 2004 AGENDA ITEM: Acceptance of the donation of certain real estate for entrance improvements to the Vinton Business Center, Vinton Magisterial District, from Richard Limroth and Kelly B. Limroth to the Board of Supervisors SUBMITTED BY: Paul M. Mahoney County Attorney COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This consent agenda item involves the acceptance of the following real estate for entrance improvements to the Vinton Business Center in the Vinton Magisterial District conveyed to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. a) Donation of 0.014 acres, together with a temporary construction easement of 0.023 acres, from Richard Limroth and Kelly B. Limroth (Deed Instrument # 200205163); Tax Map No. 71.07-1-21 as shown on a plat prepared by David A. Perfater, L.S. dated 12/6/2001, revised 12/19/01. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of the donation of this real estate and that the County Administrator, or Assistant County Administrator, be authorized to execute such documents as may be necessary to accomplish this acceptance. VOTE: Supervisor Wray motion to approve staff recommendation Motion Approved cc: File Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Janet Scheid, Chief Planner William Driver, Director, Real Estate Assessment Doug Chittum, Director, Economic Development 2 Yes No Absent Mr. McNamara ® ❑ ❑ Mr. Church ❑ ❑ Mr. Wray ® ❑ ❑ Mr. Altizer ® ❑ ❑ Mr. Flora ® ❑ ❑ cc: File Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development Janet Scheid, Chief Planner William Driver, Director, Real Estate Assessment Doug Chittum, Director, Economic Development 2 q J 0 • O Charles Dewey Mitchell ~ D.B. 1117, PG. 172 oI "`Tax # 71.07-01-45 LON RICHARD & KELLY S. LIMROTH INST. #200205163 Tax # 71.07-01-21 0.500 Acres (Deed) —0.014 Acres (R/W) 0.486 Acres (Net) I Qw zz ¢0 �N z0 <0 0 w EXISTING Wendell W. & Patricia A. Hall DWELLING D.B. 1253, PG. 1649 Tax # 71.07-01-22 r� 1 0.014 AC. 0.023 AC. Temporary I Proposed R/W I Construction Easement i 11 Proposed I I R/W Line a s6>•4j'2s f 503'09'46"E 09'7n„ 1Q' X7.86' ZL.09 RgRp), 589.38'31 "W 75.0' TOT. �w R�gD \i�ro>\ TEMPLE DRIVE w VARIES R ry �eA,Pr FNr\ LEGEND OE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE IJ POWER POLE FE PROPERTY LINE R/W RIGHT OF WAY LINE SHADED AREA DENOTES STREET RIGHT—OF—WAY TO BE ACQUIRED. PERMANENT STREET RIGHT—OF—WAY AREA — 615 SQ. FT. (0.014 AC.) HATCHED AREA DENOTES TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AREA — 994 SQ. FT. (0.023 AC.) STREET RIGHT—OF—.WAY AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT BEING GRMNTED TO ROANOKE COUNTY BY RICHARD & KELLY B. LIMROTH ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA e MATTERN & CRAJG, INC. SCALE:- 1 ° = 40• REV: 12/19/01 FIRST STREET OKE., VIRGINIA 24016 DATE: DEC. 6, 2001 REV: 05-29-02 'HONE (540)345-9342 TAY kin 71 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, MAY 11, 2004 RESOLUTION 051104-3 CERTIFYING THE CLOSED MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened a closed meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.2-3712 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such closed meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the closed meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the closed meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Wray to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Wray, Altizer, Flora NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisors Church, McNamara A COPY TESTE: Brenda J. Holt n, CMC Deputy Clerk cc: File Closed Meeting