HomeMy WebLinkAbout9/28/2004 - Adopted Board RecordsAT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 2004
ORDINANCE 092804-1 AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 52488-12
AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE LEASE WITH INGERSOLL-
RAND (BOGAR, LLC) TO PROVIDE FOR AN EARLY TERMINATION
OF A RECREATIONAL LEASE
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as
follows:
1. That on February 9, 1988, the Board of Supervisors adopted an ordinance
authorizing the lease of approximately 5 acres from Ingersoll-Rand for recreational
purposes (Ordinance No. 2988-6). The term of the lease was for a 25 -year period.
2. That on May 24, 1988, the Board amended this lease to provide for a 3 -
year renewable term (Ordinance No. 52488-12).
3. That Bogar, LLC purchased the Ingersoll-Rand property and is the
successor -in -interest to Ingersoll-Rand. It has requested an amendment to the lease to
provide for an early termination upon 90 days written notice.
4. That pursuant to the provisions of § 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke
County, a first reading of an ordinance amending the lease was held on September 14,
2004; a second reading on this matter was held on September 28, 2004.
5. That the amendment to the lease by Roanoke County from Ingersoll-
Rand, now Bogar, LLC, of approximately 5 acres for recreational purposes to provide
for an early termination of said lease is hereby authorized and approved.
6. That the County Administrator, or Assistant County Administrator, is
authorized to execute such document and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke
County as are necessary to accomplish this transaction, all of which shall be upon form
approved by the County Attorney.
On motion of Supervisor Flora to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Church, Wray, Altizer, Flora
NAYS: None
1
A COPY TESTE:
Mill .
Diane S. Childers
Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Jill Loope, Assistant Director, Economic Development
Pete Haislip, Director, Parks, Recreation, & Tourism
Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development
Janet Scheid, Chief Planner
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
2
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 28,2004
RESOLUTION 092804-2 APPROVING AND CONCURRING
IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED
AS ITEM K - CONSENT AGENDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as
follows:
1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for September
28, 2004, designated as Item K - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and
concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1
through 8, inclusive, as follows:
1. Approval of minutes — September 14, 2004
2. Confirmation of committee appointments to the Library Board (Appointed by
District) and the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority
3. Resolution of appreciation upon the retirement of Philip J. Patrone, Police
Department, following twenty-five years of service
4. Request from Unified Human Transportation Services (RADAR) to accept and
appropriate a grant in the amount of $208,000 for the purchase of vans and to
appropriate Section 5311 monies in the amount of $28,351 for operating costs
5. Request from schools to appropriate a grant in the amount of $1,275 from the
Virginia Commission for the Arts
6. Request from schools to appropriate dual enrollment revenues in the amount of
$679.06
7. Request to appropriate funds in an amount not to exceed $9,000 from the Board
contingency account to Chandler Planning
8. Request to approve resolution authorizing the County of Roanoke to enter into a
commercial credit card relationship with SunTrust Bank Card
1
2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by
law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item
pursuant to this resolution.
On motion of Supervisor Flora to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following
recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Church, Wray, Altizer, Flora
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
&f . ,sm)
Diane S. Childers
Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
cc: File
John Chambliss, Assistant County Attorney
Rebecca Owens, Director, Finance
Dr. Lorraine Lange, Assistant Superintendent of Instruction
Dr. Linda Weber, Schools Superintendent
Brenda Chastain, Clerk, School Board
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
Diane Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer
2
ACTION NO. A -092804-2.a
ITEM NO. K-2
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: September 28, 2004
AGENDA ITEM: Confirmation of committee appointments to the Library Board
(Appointed by District) and the Roanoke Valley Resource
Authority
SUBMITTED BY:
APPROVED BY:
Diane S. Childers
Clerk to the Board
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Library Board (Appointed by District)
Supervisor Altizer has requested that Lisa Boggess, Vinton Magisterial District, be added
to the consent agenda for confirmation at this meeting to complete the remaining portion of
an unexpired four-year term and an additional four-year term that will expire on December
31, 2008.
Roanoke Valley Resouce Authority
At the September 14, 2004 meeting, Supervisor Church nominated Keith Tenson to
complete the unexpired portion of the vacant four-year term which will expire on December
31, 2005.
Following a closed session discussion at the September 14 meeting, it was the consensus
of the Board to place this nomination on the September 28 consent agenda for
confirmation.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the above appointment be confirmed.
VOTE:
Supervisor Flora motion to approve staff recommendation
Motion Approved
cc: File
Library Board File
Roanoke Valley Resource Authority File
2
Yes
No
Abs
Mr. McNamara
®
❑
❑
Mr. Church
®
❑
❑
Mr. Wray
®
❑
❑
Mr. Altizer
®
❑
❑
Mr. Flora
®
❑
❑
cc: File
Library Board File
Roanoke Valley Resource Authority File
2
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 2004
RESOLUTION 092804-2.b EXPRESSING THE APPRECIATION OF THE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY UPON THE
RETIREMENT OF PHILIP J. PATRONE, POLICE DEPARTMENT, AFTER
TWENTY-FIVE YEARS OF SERVICE
WHEREAS, Philip J. Patrone was first employed by Roanoke County on May
1, 1979, as a Deputy Sheriff, and advanced to the rank of Captain; and
WHEREAS, Captain Patrone was one of the original members of the Police
Department which was established in 1990; and
WHEREAS, Captain Patrone spent most of his career as a detective in
investigations and became a polygraph examiner; and
WHEREAS, Captain Patrone was promoted to sergeant in 1998 and worked
in the Professional Standards Unit until 2002; and
WHEREAS, Captain Patrone managed the investigations function and the
Uniform Division prior to his retirement from Roanoke County on September 1, 2004, after
twenty-five years of service; and
WHEREAS, Captain Patrone, through his employment with Roanoke County,
has been instrumental in improving the quality of life for its citizens.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia, expresses its deepest appreciation and the appreciation of the
r
citizens of Roanoke County to PHILIP J. PATRONE for twenty-five years of capable, loyal
and dedicated service to Roanoke County; and
FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors does express its best wishes for a
happy and productive retirement.
On motion of Supervisor Flora to adopt the resolution, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Church, Wray, Altizer, Flora
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Ah'JA _q lj/w)
Diane S. Childers
Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Resolutions of Congratulation File
2
ACTION NO. A -092804-2.c
ITEM NO. K-4
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: September 28, 2004
AGENDA ITEM: Request from Unified Human Transportation Services
(RADAR) to accept and appropriate a grant in the amount of
$208,000 for the purchase of vans and to appropriate Section
5311 monies in the amount of $28,351 for operating costs
SUBMITTED BY: John M. Chambliss, Jr.
Asst. County Administrator
APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Unified Human Transportation Services (RADAR), who operates the CORTRAN program
on behalf of Roanoke County, has been advised by the Commonwealth of Virginia's
Department of Rail and Public Transportation that they have been awarded a capital grant
for the purchase of four replacement vans/lifts in the amount of $208,000. This represents
$197,600 in State monies and $10,400 local match which will be paid by RADAR. These
monies must pass through a local government entity and the application was approved in
the name of Roanoke County. No local monies are involved as this is simply a pass-
through grant.
RADAR has also been advised that they will receive $28,351 in Section 5311 operating
monies which is used to offset operating costs for the CORTRAN program in the rural
areas of Roanoke County. RADAR monitors the request for service and offsets our
operating expenses for qualified rides provided by the program.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No new local monies are required for these grants. The grant for the purchase of the vans
uses state money and is matched by RADAR. The operating money for the CORTRAN
program serves as the match for the 5311 monies.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends acceptance and appropriation of a grant in the amount of $208,000 to
RADAR for the purchase of vans and appropriation of Section 5311 monies in the amount
of $28,351 for operating costs.
VOTE:
Supervisor Flora motion to approve staff recommendation
Motion Approved
cc: File
John Chambliss, Assistant County Attorney
Rebecca Owens, Director, Finance
2
Yes
No
Abs
Mr. McNamara
®
❑
❑
Mr. Church
®
❑
❑
Mr. Wray
®
❑
❑
Mr. Altizer
®
❑
❑
Mr. Flora
®
❑
❑
cc: File
John Chambliss, Assistant County Attorney
Rebecca Owens, Director, Finance
2
ACTION NO. A -092804-2.d
ITEM NO. K-5
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: September 28, 2004
AGENDA ITEM: Request from schools to appropriate a grant in the amount of
$1,275 from the Virginia Commission for the Arts
SUBMITTED BY: Dr. Lorraine Lange
Assistant Superintendent of Instruction
APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Virginia Commission for the Arts provides grants for projects for the arts. Roanoke
County schools received a grant in the amount of $1,275 from the commission. The funds
will be used for the Center for Visual Arts curriculum writing and community resources.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
ALTERNATIVES:
None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends appropriation of Virginia Commission for the Arts grant in the amount of
$1,275 for the Center for Visual Arts curriculum writing and community resources.
VOTE:
Supervisor. Flora motion to approve staff recommendation
Motion Approved
cc: File
Dr. Lorraine Lange, Assistant Superintendent of Instruction
Dr. Linda Weber, Schools Superintendent
Brenda Chastain, Clerk, School Board
Rebecca Owens, Director, Finance
2
Yes
No
Abs
Mr. McNamara
®
❑
❑
Mr. Church
®
❑
❑
Mr. Wray
®
❑
❑
Mr. Altizer
®
❑
❑
Mr. Flora
®
❑
❑
cc: File
Dr. Lorraine Lange, Assistant Superintendent of Instruction
Dr. Linda Weber, Schools Superintendent
Brenda Chastain, Clerk, School Board
Rebecca Owens, Director, Finance
2
ACTION NO. A -092804-2.e
ITEM NO. K-6
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: September 28, 2004
AGENDA ITEM: Request from schools to appropriate dual enrollment revenues
in the amount of $679.06
SUBMITTED BY: Dr. Lorraine Lange
Assistant Superintendent of Instruction
APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: -
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Virginia Western Community College (VWCC) did not bill one class during the second
semester of the 2003-2004 school year. Roanoke County schools paid the bill and
received $679.06 from VWCC for teacher salary and use of the building.
Roanoke County schools requests that $679.06 be appropriated to the instructional
program, budget code 797530-6501.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
ALTERNATIVES:
None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends appropriation of dual enrollment revenues in the amount of $679.06 to
the instructional program.
1
VOTE:
Supervisor Flora motion to approve staff recommendation
Motion Approved
cc: File
Dr. Lorraine Lange, Assistant Superintendent of Instruction
Dr. Linda Weber, Schools Superintendent
Brenda Chastain, Clerk, School Board
Rebecca Owens, Director, Finance
F
Yes
No
Abs
Mr. McNamara
®
❑
❑
Mr. Church
®
❑
❑
Mr. Wray
®
❑
❑
Mr. Altizer
®
❑
❑
Mr. Flora
®
❑
❑
cc: File
Dr. Lorraine Lange, Assistant Superintendent of Instruction
Dr. Linda Weber, Schools Superintendent
Brenda Chastain, Clerk, School Board
Rebecca Owens, Director, Finance
F
ACTION NO. A -092804-2.f
ITEM NO. K-7
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY
ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: September 28, 2004
AGENDA ITEM: Request to appropriate funds in an amount not to
exceed $9,000 from the Board contingency account to
Chandler Planning
SUBMITTED BY: Paul M. Mahoney
County Attorney
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Board previously authorized engaging Dr. Michael Chandler to assist in the
development of the revisions and amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. This
action will appropriate funds from the Board's contingency account to pay for
these professional services.
Dr. Chandler has submitted an invoice dated September 13, 2004 in the amount
of $2,968.74, which covers his services through August 31, 2004. Staff
anticipates additional professional services from Dr. Chandler over the next
several months until this process is completed. Therefore staff is requesting
authority to pay future invoices from the Board contingency account in an amount
not to exceed $9,000.00.
FISCAL IMPACT:
$9,000.00 from the Board contingency account.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Board authorize the expenditure of an amount not to
exceed $9,000.00 to Chandler Planning from the Board contingency account.
VOTE:
Supervisor Flora motion to approve staff recommendation
Motion Approved
cc: File
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
Rebecca Owens, Director, Finance
Yes
No
Abs
Mr. McNamara
®
❑
❑
Mr. Church
®
❑
❑
Mr. Wray
®
❑
Mr. Altizer
®
❑
❑
Mr. Flora
®
❑
❑
cc: File
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
Rebecca Owens, Director, Finance
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 2004
RESOLUTION 092804-2.g AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY OF
ROANOKE TO ENTER INTO A COMMERCIAL CREDIT CARD
ACCOUNT RELATIONSHIP WITH SUNTRUST BANK CARD, N.A.
(,,,,BANK,,)
WHEREAS, the County of Roanoke desires to enter into a commercial credit
card account relationship with SunTrust Bank Card, N.A. (the "Bank") and
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, as follows:
1. That the County of Roanoke enters into a commercial credit card account
relationship with SunTrust Bank Card.
2. That the County Administrator or designee is authorized to enter into and
execute on behalf of the County any agreements or documents the Bank may require in
order to establish the commercial credit card account relationship upon form approved
by the County Attorney.
3. That the County shall be bound by the terms and conditions of the
agreements, all as now existing or as amended from time to time.
4. That the undersigned is authorized and directed to furnish said Bank a
certified copy of this resolution, which resolution shall continue in full force and effect
until written notice of modification or revocation of this resolution has been received by
the Bank and the Bank has had reasonable time to act on such notice, and to furnish
said Bank the names and specimen signature of the authorized person named herein,
and such persons from time to time holding above positions.
1
5. That the appropriate officers are hereby authorized and directed to execute,
deliver and file all documents, certificates and instruments and to take all such further
action as may be necessary or desirable in connection with and that are in conformity
with the purposes and intent of this resolution.
On motion of Supervisor Flora to adopt the resolution, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Church, Wray, Altizer, Flora
NAYS: None
A OPY TESTE:
Diane S. Childers
Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Rebecca Owens, Director, Finance
Diane Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
2
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 2004
RESOLUTION 092804-3 CERTIFYING THE CLOSED MEETING WAS
HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened a
closed meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance
with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.2-3712 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the
Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such closed meeting was
conducted in conformity with Virginia law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge:
1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements
by Virginia law were discussed in the closed meeting which this certification resolution
applies, and
2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the
closed meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia.
On motion of Supervisor Altizer to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following
recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Church, Wray, Altizer, Flora
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Diane S. Childers
Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Closed Meeting File
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 2004
RESOLUTION 092804-4 AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A
COMPREHENSIVE AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO THE PUBLIC-
PRIVATE EDUCATION FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE ACT OF
2002 TO DESIGN, DEVELOP AND CONSTRUCT A NEW PUBLIC
SAFETY FACILITY AND CERTAIN RADIO SYSTEM UPGRADES, TO
AMEND A CONTRACT WITH CONSTRUCTION DYNAMICS GROUP
FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND VALUE ENGINEERING,
AND TO APPROPRIATE FUNDS FOR THESE PURPOSES
WHEREAS, Roanoke County, Virginia, (the "County") has an urgent need for a
new public safety facility and radio system upgrades (the "Project"), and the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, (the "Board") has included in its Capital
Improvement Program plans for building such facilities; and
WHEREAS, the means traditionally used to procure new facility design and
construction could result in limited flexibility in design and longer lead times for delivery
of these facilities than desirable; and
WHEREAS, the General Assembly enacted the Public -Private Education
Facilities and Infrastructure Act of 2002 ("PPEA"), which provides an alternative to
traditional methods for procurement of new design and construction services; and
WHEREAS, the Board adopted its implementation procedures for the PPEA on
May 13, 2003; and
WHEREAS, the Board subsequently received an unsolicited proposal pursuant to
the PPEA from Northrop -Grumman Corporation to construct an emergency
communications/public safety center and determined that it would be advantageous to
the public to proceed under the PPEA; and
1
WHEREAS, the Board determined that proceeding with the procurement under
the PPEA was likely to be advantageous to the public and that use of "competitive
negotiation" procedures under the PPEA for the procurement of these facilities was
likely to be more advantageous to the County and the public based upon (1) the
probable scope, complexity, or urgency of the project, or (2) risk sharing, added value,
economic benefit from the project that would not otherwise be available; and
WHEREAS, the Board then accepted the unsolicited proposal and invited
competing proposals for the procurement of the emergency communications/public
safety center; and
WHEREAS, the County received proposals from three offerors; Northrop -
Grumman Corporation, Public Facilities Consortium, LLC and SafetyFirst; and
WHEREAS, The County engaged the services of qualified professionals not
employed by the County to provide to the County independent analysis regarding the
specifics, advantages, disadvantages, and long- and short-term costs of the proposals
for this Project; and
WHEREAS, County staff has engaged in negotiation of a comprehensive
agreement with Northrop Grumman Corporation, and a draft copy of the negotiated
comprehensive agreement has been provided to the members of the Board of
Supervisors; and
WHEREAS, the negotiated comprehensive agreement is within the scope of the
procurement and the procurement's terms and conditions, is in the public interest, and
the qualifying project for which it provides serves the public purpose under the criteria of
Va. Code § 56-575.4.C.
2
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
(1) The Board of Supervisors hereby finds that the qualifying Project to be
performed under the negotiated comprehensive agreement with Northrop Grumman
Corporation serves the public purpose under the criteria of Va. Code § 56-575.4.C;
(2) The Board hereby determines in writing that Northrop Grumman
Corporation is most qualified to implement this Project, and that it has made the best
proposal.
(3) The County Administrator is authorized to execute the comprehensive
agreement on behalf of the County to build this Project, upon form approved by the
County Attorney, and to take such actions as may be necessary and appropriate to
implement the purposes of this resolution.
(4) The Board recognizes that, given the length of the comprehensive
agreement and the schedule within which it was negotiated and drafted, further minor
revisions to it, primarily of a technical nature, may be necessary or desirable, and it
therefore authorizes the County Administrator to execute on its behalf the
comprehensive agreement with Northrop Grumman Corporation and, prior to execution,
to make any technical changes to it agreed upon by him and Northrop Grumman
Corporation that do not materially affect its terms and conditions, provided that the
County Attorney concurs with such technical changes.
(5) The Board authorizes an amendment to the contract with Construction
Dynamics Group to provide construction management and value engineering services
for this Project.
3
(6) The Board authorizes funding for the replacement of the school
warehouses currently on the Public Safety Building site. For this purpose, $500,000 is
included as part of the appropriation in Item 7 below.
(7) The Board hereby appropriates the sum of $28,280,540 to the Public
Safety Building Project. This project is funded from $22,170,000 of lease revenue
bonds sold through Virginia Resources Authority on June 30, 2004, and $6,110,540
transferred from the Capital Unappropriated Balance.
On motion of Supervisor Church to adopt the resolution, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Church, Wray, Altizer, Flora
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
�s A&M)
Diane S. Childers
Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Dan O'Donnell, Assistant County Administrator
Diane Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer
Rebecca Owens, Director, Finance
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
51
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY
ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 2004
RESOLUTION 092804-5 ESTABLISHING A PROGRAM FOR
SPOT BLIGHT ABATEMENT IN ROANOKE COUNTY
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, has
determined blighted or deteriorated areas and properties are developing in
Roanoke County, and,
WHEREAS, these blighted or deteriorated areas are defined as areas with
buildings or improvements which, by reason of dilapidation, obsolescence,
overcrowding, faulty arrangement of design, lack of ventilation, light, and sanitary
facilities, excessive land coverage, deleterious land use or obsolete layout, or
any combination of these and other factors, are detrimental to the safety, health,
morals or welfare of the community; and,
WHEREAS, the Board finds that the establishment of a spot blight
abatement program in accordance with the provisions of Section 36-49.1:1 of the
Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, is necessary and appropriate, and
WHEREAS, that certain blighted, deteriorated or deteriorating areas are
susceptible of conservation through appropriate public action and the elimination
or prevention of the spread or increase of blight or deterioration in such areas is
necessary for the public welfare and is a public purpose for which public money
may be spent and private property acquired by purchase or by the power of
eminent domain.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia,
1
1) That there is hereby established a spot blight abatement program
for Roanoke County, in accordance with the provisions of Section 36-49.1:1 of
the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended.
2) That the County Administrator shall develop procedural guidelines
for the implementation of this program and the exercise of the spot blight
abatement powers authorized by the Code of Virginia, in substantial conformity
with Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The County
Administrator is authorized to delegate functions and activities as he deems
appropriate.
3) That the County Administrator is granted the power and authority
as may be necessary to commence spot blight abatement in Roanoke County, as
provided in this Resolution and consistent with the provisions of law.
4) That this Resolution shall be effective immediately upon its
adoption.
On motion of Supervisor Wray to adopt the resolution, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Church, Wray, Altizer, Flora
NAYS: None
AOPY TESTE:
Diane S. Childers
Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development
Janet Scheid, Chief Planner
Rebecca Owens, Director, Finance
2
Exhibit A
§ 36-49.1:1. Spot blight abatement authorized; procedure.
A. Notwithstanding any other provision of this article, an authority, or any locality,
shall have the power to acquire or repair any blighted property, as defined in §
36-49, whether inside or outside of a conservation or redevelopment area, by
exercise of the powers of eminent domain provided in Chapter 2 (§ 25.1-200 et
seq.) of Title 25.1, and, further, shall have the power to hold, clear, repair,
manage or dispose of such property for purposes consistent with this title. In
addition, the locality shall have the power to recover the costs of any repair or
disposal of such property from the owner. This power shall be exercised only in
accordance with the procedures set forth in this section.
B. The chief executive or designated agency or authority of the locality shall
make a preliminary determination that a property is blighted in accordance with
this article. It shall notify the owner, specifying the reasons why the property is
considered blighted. The owner shall have 30 days within which to respond with
a plan to cure the blight within a reasonable time.
C. If the owner fails to respond within the 30 -day period with a plan that is
acceptable to the chief executive of the agency, authority or locality, the agency,
authority or locality (i) may request the local planning commission to conduct a
public hearing and make findings and recommendations that shall be reported to
the governing body of the locality concerning the repair or other disposition of the
property in question and (ii) in the event a public hearing is scheduled, shall
prepare a plan for the repair or other disposition of the property.
D. Not less than three weeks prior to the date of the public hearing before the
planning commission, the commission shall provide by regular and certified mail,
notice of such hearing to (i) the owner of the blighted property or the agent
designated by him for receipt of service of notices concerning the payment of real
estate taxes within the locality; (ii) the abutting property owners in each direction,
including those property owners immediately across the street or road from the
property; and (iii) the representative neighborhood association, if any, for the
immediate area. The notice shall include the plan for the intended repair or other
disposition of the property. The notice of the public hearing shall be published at
least twice, with not less than six days elapsing between the first and second
publication in a newspaper published or having general circulation in the locality
in which the property is located. The notice also shall be posted on the property.
The notice shall specify the time and place of the hearing at which persons
affected may appear and present their views, not less than six days nor more
than 21 days after the second publication.
E. The planning commission shall determine whether:
1. The owner has failed to cure the blight or present a reasonable plan to do so;
Exhibit A
2. The property is blighted;
3. The plan for the repair or other disposition of the property is in accordance with
the locally adopted comprehensive plan, zoning ordinances, and other applicable
land use regulations; and
4. The property is located within an area listed on the National Register of
Historic Places. In such instances, the planning commission shall consult with the
locally established architectural review board, if any, regarding the proposed
repair or other disposition of the property by the authority or governing body.
F. The planning commission shall report its findings and recommendations
concerning the property to the governing body. The governing body, upon receipt
of such findings and recommendations, may, after an advertised public hearing,
affirm, modify, or reject the planning commission's findings and
recommendations. If the repair or other disposition of the property is approved,
the authority, agency or locality may carry out the approved plan to repair or
acquire and dispose of the property in accordance with the approved plan, the
provisions of this section, and applicable law. The locality shall have a lien on all
property so repaired or acquired under an approved plan to recover the cost of (i)
improvements made by such locality to bring the blighted property into
compliance with applicable building codes and (ii) disposal, if any. The lien
authorized by this subsection shall be filed in the circuit court where the property
is located and shall be subordinate to any prior liens of record. The governing
body may recover its costs of repair from the owner of record of the property
when the repairs were made at such time as the property is sold or disposed of
by such owner. If the property is acquired by the governing body through eminent
domain, the cost of repair may be recovered when the governing body sells or
disposes of the property. In either case, the costs of repair shall be recovered
from the proceeds of any such sale.
G. Notwithstanding the provisions of this section, unless otherwise provided for in
Title 36, if the blighted property is occupied for personal residential purposes, the
governing body, in approving the plan, shall not allow for an acquisition of such
property if it would result in a displacement of the person or persons living in the
premises. The provisions of this subsection shall not apply to acquisitions, under
an approved plan, by any locality of property which has been condemned for
human habitation for more than one year. In addition, such locality exercising the
powers of eminent domain in accordance with Title 25.1, may provide for
temporary relocation of any person living in the blighted property provided the
relocation is within the financial means of such person.
H. In lieu of the acquisition of blighted property by the exercise of the powers of
eminent domain as herein provided, and in lieu of the exercise of other powers
granted in subsections A through F, a locality may, by ordinance, declare any
blighted property as defined in § 36-49 to constitute a nuisance, and thereupon
Exhibit A
abate the nuisance pursuant to § 15.2-900 or § 15.2-1115. Such ordinance shall
be adopted only after written notice by certified mail to the owner or owners at
the last known address of such owner as shown on the current real estate tax
assessment books or current real estate tax assessment records.
I. The provisions of this section shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to
any remedies for spot blight abatement that may be authorized by law.
(1994, 2nd Sp. Sess., cc. 5, 10; 1995, cc. 702, 827; 1996, c. 847; 1997, c. 572;
1998, cc. 690, 898; 1999, cc. 39, 410, 418; 2001, c. 482; 2003, c. 940.)
Exhibit B
�-2)R
COUNTY OF ROANOKE
SPOT BLIGHT ABATEMENT PROCESS
PURSUANT TO VIRGINIA CODE Section 36-49.1:1
1. The Department of Community Development receives blighted property referrals
from Board members, community groups, other County agencies and citizens.
2. All referred properties are entered into a blight database. The Department of
Community Development investigates, begins a file on referred property and makes
a preliminary blight assessment.
A property can be considered blighted if it meets the standards set forth in Virginia
Code Sections 36-49 and 36-49.1:1 and if it meets any of the following criteria:
1. It has been vacant and/or boarded for at least one year.
2. It has been the subject of documented complaints.
3. It is no longer being maintained for useful occupancy
4. It is dilapidated or lacks normal maintenance and upkeep.
5. It has been the subject of nuisance abatement actions undertaken by the
County.
3. The Chief Building Official in coordination with the Blight Improvement Group
(Health, Fire, Police, County Planning, and County Attorney) reviews properties on
the referred blight list. Upon review of the property, a preliminary blight
determination is made if the property meets the criteria for the Determination of
Blighted Properties.
4. If condition of property is determined to be blighted by the Blight Improvement Group
(BIG), the County Administrator, or his designee, sends a certified letter to the owner
of record indicating a preliminary determination of blight and giving 30 days to cure
the blight.
5. The Chief Building Official follows up to assist the owner toward resolution through
compliance. Upon the owner's failure to eliminate the blight or failure to submit an
acceptable plan to cure the blight, the Chief Building Official and BIG prepares a
blight abatement plan and requests a hearing before the Planning Commission.
6. The Planning Commission schedules the matter for public hearing. Notice of the
hearing must be sent 3 weeks prior by regular and certified mail to:
Exhibit B
a. owner(s)
b. abutting owner(s)
c. civic league or association, if any for the immediate area
Notice must include plan for dealing with blight (i.e., teardown, repair, etc.) Notice
must also be published twice (with not less than 6 days elapsing between first and
second publication). Notice shall also be posted on the property. Hearing must
occur within 21 days of 2nd application.
7. The Planning Commission holds a public hearing and determines whether (1)
property is blighted; (2) whether owner has failed to cure blight or develop a
reasonable plan; (3) whether plan is in accordance with applicable law and (4)
whether property is listed as historic.
8. The Planning Commission reports its findings to the Board of Supervisors.
9. Board of Supervisors holds advertised public hearing and affirms, modifies or rejects
the Planning Commission findings.
10. If Board of Supervisors approves repair or demolition, the Department of Community
Development will solicit bids and will carry out a contract to abate the blight.
11.The owner of record is billed for the cost of blight abatement including administrative
costs. If the owner fails to pay for the abatement, the costs will be collected by any
manner provided by law for collection of state or local taxes. A lien shall be
recorded to recover the County's costs and expenses.
12. If Board of Supervisors determines that it is necessary to acquire property by
eminent domain in order to cure the blight, the matter is referred to the County
Attorney's Office for condemnation suit.
13.Throughout the entire process, the Department of Community Development
continues to work with the owner to gain voluntary compliance to eliminate blight.
2
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER, TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 2004
ORDINANCE 092804-6 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF
A 6.15 -ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT THE NORTHERLY
END OF BYRON ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 036.19-01-12.01 AND PORTION
OF TAX MAP NO. 036.19-01-40) IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL
DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R1 LOW DENSITY
TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R3 MEDIUM DENSITY MULTI
FAMILY DISTRICT WITH CONDITIONS IN ORDER TO CONSTRUCT
TOWNHOUSES UPON THE APPLICATION OF PINKERTON
PROPERTIES, LLC
WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on August 24, 2004, and the
second reading and public hearing were held September 28, 2004; and,
WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this
matter on September 7, 2004; and
WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as
follows:
1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 6.15
acres, as described herein in order to construct townhouses, and located at the northerly
end of Byron Road (Tax Map Number 036.19-01-12.01 and portion of Tax Map Number
036.19-01-40) in the Catawba Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning
classification of R1, Low Density District, to the zoning classification of R3, Medium Density
Multi family District.
2. That this action is taken upon the application of Pinkerton Properties, LLC.
3. That the owner of the property has voluntarily proffered in writing the following
conditions which the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby accepts:
1
The property will be developed in substantial conformity with the "Revised
Townhouse Development August 20, 2004, Proposed 28 Townhouses Proposed Zoning
R-3, 6.15 Acres", prepared by T. P. Parker & Son attached hereto.
2. Wherever possible, existing vegetation shall be preserved and incorporated
into the buffering requirements. Screening and buffering in that area of the development
adjoining Tax Map No. 036.19-01-12.00 shall utilize Type (A) Buffer, Option 2 with an eight
(8) foot vinyl screening fence instead of the six (6) foot screening required.
4. That said real estate is more fully described as follows:
PARCEL 1:
BEGINNING at a point at the northwest corner of Lot 12, Block 18, Section
4, Montclair Estates (PB 10, PG 7); said point being at the northeast corner
of Byron Drive; thence S. 650 00'30" W 191.02 feet to a point; thence N. 240
55' 30" E, 180.31 feet to a point; N. 71 019'24" E. 57.68 feet to a point; thence
with a curved line to the right having a chord, bearing and distance of S.
66048' 03" E. 200.26 feet, a distance of 219.26 feet to a point; thence S.
24055'30" E. 7.07 feet to the point and place of BEGINNING.
PARCEL 2:
BEGINNING at a point at the northeast corner of Lot 1, Block 5, Montclair
Forest, as said point intersects with the line of Section 4, Montclair Estates;
thence with the line of Montclair Forest S. 71' 03' 00" W. 464.08 feet to a
point; thence with a new division line through the property of Pinkerton
Properties, LLC, (Tax Map No. 36.19-01-40) to a point; thence
N. 710 03'00" E. 364.22 feet to a point; thence S. 240 55'30" E. 463.33 feet
to the point and place of BEGINNING.
5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this
ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. The Zoning Administrator is directed to
amend the zoning district map to reflect the change in zoning classification authorized by
this ordinance.
2
On motion of Supervisor Church to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following
recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Church, Wray, Altizer, Flora
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Diane S. Childers
Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development
Janet Scheid, Chief Planner
William Driver, Director, Real Estate Valuation
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
3
cc: File
Circuit Court
Clifford R. Weckstein, Judge
William Broadhurst, Judge
Robert P. Doherty, Jr., Judge
Jonathan M. Apgar, Judge
James R. Swanson, Judge
Charles N. Dorsey, Judge
Steven A. McGraw, Clerk
Juvenile Domestic Relations District Court
Joseph M. Clarke, II, Judge
Philip Trompeter, Judge
John B. Ferguson, Judge
Joseph P. Bounds, Judge
Ruth P. Bates, Clerk
Intake Counsellor
General District Court
George W. Harris, Judge
Vincent Lilley, Judge
Julian H. Raney, Judge
Jacqueline F. Ward Talevi, Judge
Francis W. Burkart, III, Judge
Theresa A. Childress, Clerk
Gerald Holt, Sheriff
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
Randy Leach, Commonwealth Attorney
Magistrates Sherri Krantz/Betty Perry
Main Library
Ray Lavinder, Police Chief
Richard Burch, Chief of Fire & Rescue
Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke 24016
Roanoke County Law Library, Singleton Osterhoudt
Roanoke County Code Book
John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator
Dan O'Donnell, Assistant County Administrator
Diane D. Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer
O. Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development
Janet Scheid, Chief Planner
Brent Robertson, Director, Budget
Rebecca Owens, Director, Finance
Betty McCrary, Director, Social Services
David Davis, Court Services
Elaine Carver, Director, Information Technology
Anne Marie Green, Director, General Services
Thomas S. Haislip, Director, Parks, Recreation & Tourism
William E. Driver Director, Real Estate Valuation
F. Kevin Hutchins, Treasurer
Nancy Horn, Commissioner of Revenue
12
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER, TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 2004
ORDINANCE 092804-7 AMENDING SECTIONS 7-71. BUILDING
PERMIT FEES AND 7-72. TRADE PERMIT FEES, ESTABLISHING A
NEW SECTION 7-73. MISCELLANOUS FEES, OF ARTICLE 5 OF
CHAPTER 7. BUILDING REGULATIONS OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY
CODE AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE
WHEREAS, as part of the HP migration project the Department of Community
Development is implementing a new software system to track building permits and to
calculate permit fees; and
WHEREAS, Novalis Technologies, Inc. is developing an integrated land records
management solution for the County; and
WHEREAS, this new software system will address the problem of the under-
reporting of annual construction values in the County; and
WHEREAS, the new method of calculating these permit fees will be based upon
building construction values as determined by the County's Real Estate Valuation
Office; and
WHEREAS, the first reading was held on September 14, 2004; and the second
reading and public hearing was held on September 28, 2004.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That Article V. Fees of Chapter 7. Building Regulations be amended to read
and provide as follows:
ARTICLE V.
FEES
Sec. 7-71. Building permit fees.
Permit fees are determined by calculating a value of construction. In order to derive this
valuation, the square footage of the structure is multiplied by the building construction
value base rates as adjusted annually by the County Real Estate Valuation Office.
1
An estimated cost of construction is obtained from the applicant and is used to
determine the permit fees for applications that do not correspond to the square footage
construction value base rates as described above. This includes, but is not limited to,
interior and exterior alterations, roofing and siding construction, and demolitions.
There is hereby established the following schedule for fees for building and demolition
permits as set out on Attachment A.
Sec. 7-72. Trade permit fees.
There is hereby established the following schedule for fees for trade permits (trade
permits include permits for heating, electrical, mechanical, and plumbing). The following
schedule for trade permits is based upon the valuation as calculated pursuant to section
7-71 as modified by a percentage factor for the use groups and the type of trade permit,
as shown on Attachment B:
In excess of $5,000.00 the fee shall be $75.00 plus $4.00 for each additional $1,000.00
or fraction thereof.
No trade permit shall be issued for less than $30.00.
Sec. 7-73. Miscellaneous fees.
There is hereby established the following schedule of miscellaneous fees:
Reinspection on Construction: $50.00 (applies on 3rd re -inspection of same item
Certificate of Occupancy:
Commercial - $25.00
Temporary — Single Family - $10.00
Temporary — Commercial - $25.00
Existing Building CO - $35.00
Elevator Periodic Inspection $35.00
Amusement Devices:
Kiddie Rides - $15.00
Circular rides or flat rides that can be inspected from less than 20 feet above ground
25.00
All Other Types of Devices - $45.00
(Amusement Device Fees reduced 50% when a private inspector is used)
2. The Director of Community Development is granted the authority to implement these
fees when the software package from Novalis Technologies, Inc. becomes operational.
2
On motion of Supervisor McNamara to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Church, Wray, Altizer, Flora
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Diane S. Childers
Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
K3