HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/7/2004 - Adopted Board RecordsACTION NO. A-120704-1
ITEM NO. E-1
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 7, 2004
AGENDA ITEM: Request preliminary approval for the purchase and funding of
five fire vehicles to continue the Fire and Rescue vehicle
replacement plan for fire apparatus
SUBMITTED BY: Richard E. Burch, Jr.
Fire and Rescue Chief
Rebecca Owens
Director of Finance
APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge, Jr.
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Fire and Rescue Department has established an on-going vehicle replacement plan
which calls for replacing fire trucks after they are twenty years old. Approval is being
requested to purchase five new KME vehicles which will replace five 1980 vehicles and
one 1975 vehicle and will result in reducing the fire apparatus fleet by one.
The replacement of these apparatus is crucial to keep modern, up-to-date and efficient
equipment available to provide service to the County citizens. Replacement of older
equipment is also essential to reduce the cost of maintenance and repairs.
We were approved to proceed with the bid process and that function is now complete.
Bids have been received for the units and total approximately $1,939,270.74 for these five
vehicles and related equipment.
The County will be purchasing the following:
• Four enclosed -cab Pumpers with 1,500 gallons -per -minute pumps and 750
gallon water tanks. These units will go to Cave Spring, Hollins, Clearbrook,
and Read Mountain.
• One enclosed -cab Tanker with a 1,500 gallons -per -minute pump and 2,500
gallon water tank. This unit will go to Fort Lewis.
In addition, with the purchase of these new vehicles, the rotation of existing equipment
from busiest to slowest stations extends the life of the vehicles. The placement of these
vehicles is detailed in Attachment A.
Fire and Rescue now seeks approval to proceed with the loan and purchase of these
vehicles.
FISCAL IMPACT:
A repayment schedule for this loan is shown as Attachment B. Budgeted funding of
$400,000 from the Fire and Rescue Department will be applied toward the total purchase
price when the units are received. Two additional annual payments of $400,000 and a
final payment of $412,371.51 in July 2007 from these budgeted funds will be made. The
additional funding of $354,603.40 will come from Botetourt County as per the agreement
dated April 25, 2003.
This financing recommendation includes an interest rate of 3% which is less than the
current market rate for a conventional lease purchase. The Risk Management Fund is part
of the County's pooled cash program that earns a percentage of the interest income
monthly based on the funds cash balance. Using these funds for financing will decrease
the amount of interest income earned which has already been budgeted.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve the purchase and adopt the attached resolution which will finance
$1,539,270.74 with interest of 3% annually through the County Risk Management
Fund to be repaid over the next three years. In addition, apply the funds from
Botetourt County to the loan.
2. Approve the purchase and finance $1,539,270.74 through a conventional lease
purchase method. In addition, apply the funds from Botetourt County to the loan.
2
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff requests the Board's concurrence to approve the purchase of five fire vehicles and
the concept of internally financing this purchase through the Risk Management Fund as
outlined in Alternative 1.
A public hearing will need to be held before this item can be approved to receive citizen
comments regarding the proposed amendments to the fiscal year 2004-2005 budget in
accordance with Section 15.2-2507, Code of Virginia, which provides that whenever such
amendment exceeds 1 % of the total expenditures shown in the adopted budget or
$500,000, whichever is lesser, the County must publish notice of a meeting and public
hearing.
Also, staff requests to have the public hearing for this item as well as the adoption of a
resolution authorizing the purchase and funding of the fire vehicles at the December 21,
2004 board meeting.
VOTE:
Supervisor Altizer motion to approve staff recommendation with the interest rate modified
to 2%
Motion Approved
cc: File
Richard Burch, Fire & Rescue Chief
Rebecca Owens, Director, Finance
Diane Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer
3
Yes
No
Abs
Mr. McNamara
®
❑
❑
Mr. Church
®
❑
❑
Mr. Wray
®
❑
❑
Mr. Altizer
®
❑
❑
Mr. Flora
®
❑
❑
cc: File
Richard Burch, Fire & Rescue Chief
Rebecca Owens, Director, Finance
Diane Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer
3
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 7, 2004
RESOLUTION 120704-2 ADOPTING A DEBT POLICY FOR THE COUNTY OF
ROANOKE
WHEREAS, one of the measures of a fiscally well managed locality is the
adoption of formal fiscal policies; and
WHEREAS, these policies should be reviewed and amended periodically; and
WHEREAS, the County previously adopted a debt policy on May 14, 1996, with
Resolution 051496-9.a; and
WHEREAS, the County now wishes to amend and restate its debt policy.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. That the Debt Policy adopted by Resolution 051496-9.a is rescinded, and
2. That the following Debt Policy for the County of Roanoke is hereby
adopted, and
3. That this policy shall be in effect from and after the date of its adoption.
On motion of Supervisor McNamara to adopt the resolution, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Church, Wray, Altizer, Flora
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
L110, A - IVL-n)
Diane S. Childers
Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
M. File
Diane Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer
Rebecca Owens, Director, Finance
County of Roanoke, Virginia
Debt Policy
I. Introduction
The County of Roanoke recognizes one of the keys to sound financial
management is the development of a debt policy. This need is recognized by
bond rating agencies and development of a debt policy is a practice
recommended by the Government Finance Officers Association. A debt policy
establishes the parameters for issuing debt and managing outstanding debt. It
also provides guidance to administration regarding the timing and purposes for
which debt may be issued, types and amounts of permissible debt, and the
method of sale that may be used. The debt policy should recognize an obligation
to full and timely repayment of all debt as an essential requirement for entry into
the capital markets. Adherence to a debt policy helps to ensure that a
government maintains a sound position and that credit quality is protected. The
debt policy is to be used in conjunction with the Operating and Capital
Improvements Budget, the Capital Improvement Program (CIP), and other
financial policies. Advantages of a debt policy are as follows:
• Enhances the quality of decisions
• Rationalizes the decision-making process
• Identifies objectives for staff to implement
• Demonstrates a commitment to long-term financial planning objectives
• Viewed positively by the rating agencies
ll. Purposes for Debt Issuance
The County may issue debt for the purpose of acquiring or constructing capital
projects including buildings, machinery, equipment, furniture, and fixtures. When
feasible, debt issuances will be pooled together to minimize issuance costs. The
County will prepare and adopt annually a five-year Capital Improvement Program
to identify and establish an orderly plan to meet the County's infrastructure
needs. The Capital Improvement Program will also identify all debt -related
projects and the debt service impact upon operations identified.
Ill. Guidelines for Issuing Debt
The County recognizes that the essential components of a debt policy are the
limitations and guidelines set by the locality. The following guidelines reflect the
County's philosophy concerning indebtedness:
The County will not use short-term borrowing to finance operating needs
except in instances as described under "Revenue Anticipation Notes".
• Long-term debt will be used in compliance with all aspects of the debt policy.
• The maturity of any debt will not exceed the expected useful life of the project
for which the debt is issued.
• Each project proposed for financing through debt issuance will have an
analysis performed for review of tax impact and future operating costs
associated with the project and debt issuance.
• At a minimum, all issuances of debt require approval and appropriation of the
proceeds by the Board of Supervisors with additional approvals, if applicable,
indicated in the under "Types of Debt/Structural Features".
IV. Debt Limits
The County does not have any constitutional or statutory debt limits. The County
does abide by the following self-imposed debt targets:
• Net debt as a percentage of assessed value will not exceed 3.0%
• Net debt per capital will not exceed a ratio of $2,500
• General obligation debt service as a percentage of general governmental
expenditures will not exceed 10%
These ratios will be calculated each year in conjunction with the budget process
and the audit.
V. Types of Debt/Structural Features
A. Bond Anticipation Notes
• The County may issue bond anticipation notes (BANs) in expectation
of general obligation bonds or revenue bonds when cash is required in
order for the financed capital project to be initiated, continued, or when
long-term markets do not appear appropriate on a given date but have
a clear potential for improvement within 12 months.
• The County will issue BANs for a period not to exceed two years.
• No BANs will be rolled over more than one additional two-year period.
B. Revenue Anticipation Notes
• The County's fund balance goal of 6.25% of General Fund revenues
was designed to provide adequate cash flow to avoid the need for
revenue anticipation notes (BANs).
• The County may issue RANs in an extreme emergency beyond the
County's control or ability to forecast when the revenue source will be
received subsequent to the timing of funds needed.
2
a
• The County will issue RANs for a period not to exceed the one-year
period permitted under the Constitution of Virginia, Article VII section
10.
C. General Obligation Bonds
• The Constitution of Virginia, Article VII section 10, and the Public
Finance Act provide the authority for a County to issue general
obligation (GO) debt with no limit on the amount of GO debt that a
County may issue.
• The County may issue GO debt for capital projects or other properly
approved projects.
• All debt secured by the general obligation of the County must be
approved by the Board of Supervisors and a public referendum with
the exception of Virginia Public School Authority (VPSA) bonds and
State Literary Fund loans which do not need approval by referendum.
D. VPSA Bonds and State Literary Fund Loans
• School capital projects may be constructed with debt, either through
VPSA bonds or State Literary Fund loans, and refunding bonds with
preference given to accessibility and interest rates.
• Approval of the School Board is required prior to approval by the Board
of Supervisors.
E. Revenue Bonds
• The County may issue revenue bonds to fund enterprise activities or
for capital projects which will generate a revenue stream.
• The bonds will include written covenants which will require that the
revenue sources are sufficient to fund the debt service requirements.
• Cost of issuance, debt service reserve funds, and capitalized interest
may be included in the capital project costs and thus are fully eligible
for reimbursement from bond proceeds.
F. Capital Acquisition Notes and Leases
• The County may issue short-term notes or capital leases to purchase
buildings, machinery, equipment, furniture, and fixtures.
G. Moral Obligation Debt
• The County may enter into leases, contracts, or other agreements with
other public bodies which provide for the payment of debt when
revenues of such agencies may prove insufficient to cover debt
service.
3
• Payment of such moral obligation debt service will be done when the
best interest of the County is clearly demonstrated.
• While such moral obligation support does not affect the debt limit of the
County, the amount of bonds issued with the County's moral obligation
should be controlled in order to limit potential demands on the County.
There is no legal obligation, but the County is placing its good name
and reputation on the line, and there is every expectation that the
County would make good any deficiencies when a default exists.
VI. Credit Objectives
The County of Roanoke will strive to maintain or improve its current bond ratings.
The County will also maintain relationships with the rating agencies that assign
ratings to the County's various debt obligations. The rating agencies will be kept
abreast of the County's financial condition by providing them with the County's
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) and the Operating and Capital
Improvements Budget.
VII. Authorized Methods of Sale
The County will select a method of sale that is the most appropriate in light of
financial, market, transaction -specific, and issuer -related conditions. Debt
obligations are generally issued through competitive sale. If the County and its
financial advisor determine that a competitive sale would not result in the best
outcome for the County, then a negotiated sale, private placement, or other
method may be chosen.
Vlll. Selecting Outside Finance Professionals
The County of Roanoke will retain external finance professionals to be selected
through a competitive process. The finance professionals will include, but may
not be limited to, the financial advisor, bond counsel, and the underwriter. The
finance professionals will assist in developing a bond issuance strategy,
preparing bond documents, and marketing bonds to investors. The length of the
contracts will be determined by the County. The selection process will require
experience in the following: (1) municipal debt, (2) diverse financial structuring,
and (3) pricing municipal securities.
IX. Advance refunding of Debt
The County may issue advance refunding bonds in accordance with federal tax
law. An advance refunding may be issued to reduce outstanding principal,
reduce interest costs, to eliminate restrictive debt covenants, or in the event of
financial emergencies or hardships. In determining whether to consider an
S
advance refunding, the County will carefully consider whether further savings can
be achieved by deferring the sale to a later date. The goal is that the savings
(net of all issuance costs and any cash contribution to the refunding) will be at
least 3 percent unless otherwise justified by the County.
X. Disclosures
The County will maintain the following practices to ensure proper disclosures:
• The County will maintain good communications with bond rating agencies to
inform them about the County's financial position by providing them the
County's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) and Operating and
Capital Improvements Budget.
• The County will follow the National Federation of Municipal Analysts and
Government Finance Officers Association policy of full continuing disclosure.
• The County will disclose the preceding ten fiscal years' debt ratios in the
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report.
• The County will disclose an estimate of the subsequent five fiscal years' debt
ratios in the Operating and Capital Improvements Budget with an analysis of
the impact, if any, moral obligation debt would have on the debt ratios.
5
ACTION NO. A-120704-3
ITEM NO. E-3
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 7, 2004
AGENDA ITEM: Request from Public Facility Consortium, LLC for a refund in
the amount of $50,000 for PPEA review fees for the public
safety building project
SUBMITTED BY: Daniel R. O'Donnell
Assistant County Administrator
APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Public Facility Consortium, LLC (PFC) has requested a refund of the $50,000 review fee
submitted to the County for analyzing the proposal for the Public Safety Facility and
communications upgrades under the Public Private Educational Facilities and
Infrastructure Act (PPEA). Although PFC did submit a very high quality proposal, County
staff and our consultants recommended the award of the contract to Northrop -Grumman
Corporation. This recommendation was approved at the Board meeting of September 28,
2004.
At several points in the process PFC considered withdrawing due to the high cost of
preparing the proposals and engaging in detailed competitive negotiations with Roanoke
County. Staff encouraged PFC to continue despite their escalating cost concerns as the
Board desired competition throughout both Phase I and Phase II of proposal submittal
process.
There are several reasons why the request to refund the deposit may be justified:
1. The County requested proposers to submit plans equal to 30% design in their Phase 11
proposals, which resulted in a great expense to the proposers. The County also
engaged in detailed competitive negotiations which caused the proposers to expend
substantial time and effort in reviews of our draft comprehensive agreement. This work
went beyond what was originally envisioned by either staff or the proposers.
2. By encouraging competition throughout the process, the County was able to negotiate
substantial savings, in the magnitude of several million dollars, in the successful
Northrop -Grumman proposal. If PFC had withdrawn from the process, these savings
would have been far more difficult to realize.
3. One of the criticisms of the PPEA process statewide is that it discourages participation
from smaller and even mid-sized firms for larger PPEA projects due to the high upfront
costs and greater risks private sector firms must be willing to take to participate. We
believe that refunding the proposal fees would be a show of support to the smaller and
mid-sized development firms that we will treat all proposers fairly should the County
chose to use the PPEA process again in the future. We believe it is in our best interest
to encourage competition in PPEA projects and this refund will encourage greater
competition in the future.
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney, has reviewed this request and has determined that it is
within the discretion of the Board to determine whether to refund the deposit. Attached is a
memorandum outlining Mr. Mahoney's review of this request.
FISCAL IMPACT:
According to our procedures, Roanoke County could deduct from the $50,000 requested
refund any direct expenses incurred by the staff in reviewing the proposal. However,
considering that PFC helped greatly with the project design and definition and caused the
County to save considerable money, reducing the refund is not being suggested.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve the refund in order to encourage participation in future PPEA projects
2. Do not approve the refund.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
In order to encourage future involvement in PPEA projects by small and mid sized firms,
staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors refund the full $50,000 to the Public
Facility Consortium. LLC. and appropriate these funds from the Minor County Capital
Fund.
2
VOTE:
Supervisor Wray motion to approve staff recommendation
Motion Approved
cc: File
Daniel O'Donnell, Assistant County Administrator
Rebecca Owens, Director, Finance
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
KI
Yes
No
Abs
Mr. McNamara
®
❑
❑
Mr. Church
®
❑
❑
Mr. Wray
®
❑
❑
Mr. Altizer
®
❑
❑
Mr. Flora
®
❑
❑
cc: File
Daniel O'Donnell, Assistant County Administrator
Rebecca Owens, Director, Finance
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
KI
ROANOKE COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Roanoke County Administration Center
5204 Bernard Drive, S.W. - Room 431
Roanoke, VA 24018-0798
Phone 772-2007 - Fax 772-2089
MEMORANDUM
To: Board of Supervisors
From: Paul M. Mahoney
Date: November 10, 2004
Subject: Refund of PFC proposal review fee
The PFC Group is requesting that the County refund the $50,000 deposit that it
submitted for the Public Safety Building project. The Board will recall that
proposers of unsolicited PPEA projects must pay a $50,000 fee to cover the cost of
processing, reviewing, and evaluating any unsolicited proposal.
In April of 2003, the Board adopted certain procedures to govern how the
County would handle applications under the Public -Private Educational
Facilities and Infrastructure Act of 2002 (the PPEA), These procedures include
the attached provision with respect to the proposal review fee.
In reviewing PFC's proposal the County has expended inore than the $50,000 fee
for out-of-pocket costs for attorneys and consultants. These out-of-pocket costs
do not include the other direct costs of County staff time required to evaluate,
re\7ietn7 and respond to this proposal.
It is my understanding that the Board will consider PFC's request at its meeting
on November 16, 2004. It is within the sound discretion of the Board to
determine whether or not to refund all or a part of this $50,000 fee. Since the
County's direct costs for reviewing the PFC proposal exceed the 550,000 deposit,
the County is justified in retaining this fee and not refunding any or all of it to
PFC.
PMM/ sb
C: Elmer C. Hodge
PUBLIC FACILITY CONSORTIUM LLC
November 10, 2004
Richard Flora, Chairman
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
5204 Bernard Drive, S.W.
Roanoke. Virginia 24018
Re: Roanoke County Public Safety Building and Radio System Upgrade
Dear Mr. Flora:
Public Facility Consortium LLC (PPC) would like to take this opportunity to thank the
County of Roanoke for its consideration and deliberation regarding the proposal
submitted for the new Public Safety Communications Center/Public Safety Building and
Radio System Upgrade.
As disappointed as our team was to learn that the project would not be awarded to PPC
the process was a learning experience for all who participated.
In
Please accept this letter as our official request that the deposit of $50,000 be refunded to
PFC. The total cost of participation and preparation of our competitive proposal by all
the members of our team was in excess of $750,000.
We wish the County of Roanoke the best in providing the Valley with the new Roanoke
County Public Safety rade. Upg
Building and Radio System
2T, 6
Please keep our team in mind for any future projects.
Sincerely,
Manager
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER,
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 7, 2004
ORDINANCE 120704-4 AUTHORIZING CONVEYANCE OF AN EASEMENT
TO APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY THROUGH PROPERTY OWNED
BY THE ROANOKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS (TAX MAP
#27.13-4-1) TO PROVIDE ELECTRIC SERVICE TO VIRGINIA PCS
ALLIANCE, L.C., DIB/A NTELOS, FOR A 3,400 SQ. FT. TOWER SITE AT
THE HOLLINS FIRE STATION ON BARRENS ROAD IN THE HOLLINS
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, is the owner of a
parcel of land, containing 2.51 acres, located at 7401 Barrens Road in the County of
Roanoke, Virginia, designated on the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map #27.13-
4-1, and commonly referred to as the Hollins Fire Station; and,
WHEREAS, by Ordinance #082404-9 adopted on August 24, 2004, the Board
approved a Special Use Permit for this project at the County site; and,
WHEREAS, by Ordinance #102604-7 adopted on October 26, 2004, the Board
approved a lease with NTELOS of a portion of the Hollins Fire Station Site to construct a
new telecommunications tower, with space available for the County's equipment and
facilities; and,
WHEREAS, in order to provide electric service to the tower site an easement is
required by Appalachian Power Company across County property; and
WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs that the
acquisition or conveyance of an interest in real estate, including easements, shall be
accomplished by ordinance; the first reading of this ordinance was held on November 16,
2004; and the second reading was held on December 7, 2004.
THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke
County, the interests in real estate to be conveyed are hereby declared to be surplus, and
are hereby made available for other public uses by conveyance to Appalachian Power
Company for the provision of electrical service in connection with the location of a new
telecommunications tower at the Hollins Fire Station, located at 7401 Barrens Road in the
County of Roanoke, Virginia, by Virginia PCS Alliance, LC, d/b/a NTELOS.
2. That donation to Appalachian Power Company of an easement and right-of-
way for underground transmission lines and related improvements, within the "proposed
10' easement area" on the County's property (Tax Map #27.13-4-1) as shown on APCO
Drawing No. V-1531, dated November 1, 2004, a copy of which is attached hereto as
Exhibit A, is hereby authorized and approved.
3. That the County Administrator, or any assistant county administrator, is
hereby authorized to execute such documents and take such further actions as may be
necessary to accomplish this conveyance, all of which shall be on form approved by the
County Attorney.
4. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption.
On motion of Supervisor Flora to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following
recorded vote:
2
AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Church, Wray, Altizer, Flora
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE.
Diane S. Childers
Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Anne Marie Green, Director, General Services
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development
Janet Scheid, Chief Planner
Rick Burch, Chief, Fire & Rescue
3
" "' �` �
I I a
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER, TUESDAY, DECEMBER 7, 2004
ORDINANCE 120704-5 APPROVING THE RESIDENTIAL LEASE OF THE
LOG CABIN LYING GENERALLY IN THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE
ROANOKE COUNTY CENTER FOR RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY
PROPERTY (TAX MAP NO. 54.00-1-2) IN THE CATAWBA MAGISTERIAL
DISTRICT OWNED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County is the owner of a tract of
land containing 457.60 acres, and being located in the Catawba Magisterial District and
designated on the Roanoke County Land Records as Tax Map No.54.00-1-2, which is
being developed for economic development purposes as the Roanoke County Center for
Research and Technology; and
WHEREAS, by Ordinance 031098-7, the Board of Supervisors authorized the
continued rental of the three residences on the property until such time as construction
would begin and require termination; and
WHEREAS, the leases for 5365 Glenmary Drive and 5393 Glenmary Drive were
terminated by the County, effective November 1, 1999, to permit commencement of
construction and,
and
WHEREAS, the log cabin at 4958 Glenmary Drive had been rented until recently;
WHEREAS, it would serve the public interest for the County to have the log cabin
occupied and maintained until such time as all or portions thereof may be needed for
economic development purposes; and,
WHEREAS, on December 2, 1997, the Board authorized creation of a self balancing
account entitled Glenn Mary Capital Account for acceptance of rent payments and
expenditure of the funds on maintenance of the property; and,
WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs that the
acquisition or conveyance of an interest in real estate, including leases, shall be
accomplished by ordinance; the first reading of this ordinance was held on November 16,
2004; and the second reading was held on December 7, 2004.
THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That the County Administrator or an Assistant County Administrator is hereby
authorized to execute a lease agreement with Melinda W. Rector for the log cabin
residence having the address of 4958 Glenvar Heights Boulevard, from February 1, 2005,
to January 31, 2006, thereafter continuing on a month to month basis, for a monthly rental
of $600.00 to be paid into the Glenn Mary Capital Account.
2. That the County Administrator or an Assistant County Administrator is
authorized to execute said lease agreement on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of the
County of Roanoke and to execute such other documents and take such further actions as
are necessary to accomplish this transaction, all of which shall be upon form and subject to
the conditions approved by the County Attorney.
3. That this ordinance shall be effective on and from the date of its adoption.
On motion of Supervisor Church to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Church, Wray, Altizer, Flora
NAYS: None
2
A COPY TESTE:
&7j o . A - 41 V&/))
Diane S. Childers
Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Anne Marie Green, Director, General Services
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
Doug Chittum, Director, Economic Development
3
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 7, 2004
RESOLUTION 120704-6 APPROVING AND CONCURRING
IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED
AS ITEM J - CONSENT AGENDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as
follows:
1. That the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for December
7, 2004, designated as Item J - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and
concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1
through 12, inclusive, as follows:
1. Approval of minutes — November 16, 2004
2. Confirmation of committee appointment to Blue Ridge Behavioral Healthcare
3. Request to accept Great Glen Drive and Celtic Circle into the state secondary
road system
4. Request to approve arneRdMeRtG to the Bylaws of Blue Ridge Behay
HealthGaFe
5. Request from the Library to accept and appropriate funds in the amount of
$1,385 from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to purchase a computer
6. Request from the Library to accept and appropriate funds in the amount of
$15,100 from the Friends of the Library
7. Request from the Fire and Rescue Department to accept and appropriate a
grant in the amount of $6,924 from the Virginia Department of Health for the
purchase of extrication equipment
8. Request from the Fire and Rescue Department to accept and appropriate a
grant in the amount of $13,000 from the Virginia Department of Health for the
purchase of cardiac heart monitors
9. Request to concur in the adoption of mandatory water and sewer connection
policy by the Western Virginia Water Authority
10. Request from Parks, Recreation & Tourism Department to accept and
appropriate $20,792 from the Commonwealth of Virginia for reimbursement for
expenses incurred for the construction of the Wolf Creek Greenway
11. Request from the Treasurer to amend the existing banking services contract
with SunTrust to allow for lock box operation
12. Request to approve an agreement with Clearbrook Volunteer Fire Department
regarding disposition of vehicles and outstanding loan balances
2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by
law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item
pursuant to this resolution.
On motion of Supervisor McNamara to adopt the resolution with Item J-4 removed,
and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Church, Wray, Altizer, Flora
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Diane S. Childers
Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Arnold Covey, Director, Community Development
Janet Scheid, Chief Planner
Diana Rosapepe, Director, Library Services
Rebecca Owens, Director, Finance
Rick Burch, Chief, Fire & Rescue
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
Pete Haislip, Director, Parks, Recreation, & Tourism
Kevin Hutchins, Treasurer
2
ACTION NO. A -120704-6.a
ITEM NO. J-2
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 7, 2004
AGENDA ITEM: Confirmation of committee appointment to Blue Ridge
Behavioral Healthcare
SUBMITTED BY: Diane S. Childers
Clerk to the Board
APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Blue Ridge Behavioral Healthcare
At the November 16, 2004 Board meeting, Supervisor Flora nominated Roger Laplace to
serve an additional three-year term which will expire on December 31, 2007.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the above appointment be confirmed.
VOTE:
Supervisor McNamara motion to approve staff recommendation
Motion Approved
CC' File
Blue Ridge Behavioral Healthcare File
Yes
No
Abs
Mr. McNamara
®
❑
❑
Mr. Church
®
❑
❑
Mr. Wray
®
❑
❑
Mr. Altizer
®
❑
❑
Mr. Flora
®
❑
❑
CC' File
Blue Ridge Behavioral Healthcare File
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, IN REGULAR MEETING
ON THE 7TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2004, ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING:
RESOLUTION 120704-6.b REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF GREAT GLEN
DRIVE AND CELTIC CIRCLE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM
WHEREAS, the street described on the attached Addition Form SR -5(A), fully
incorporated herein by reference are shown on plats recorded in the Clerk's Office of
the Circuit Court of Roanoke County, and
WHEREAS, the Resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation
has advised this Board the streets meet the requirements established by the
Subdivision Street Requirements of the Virginia Department of Transportation,
WHEREAS, the County and the Virginia Department of Transportation have
entered into an agreement on March 9, 1999 for comprehensive stormwater detention
which applies to this request for addition,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Board requests the Virginia
Department of Transportation to add the streets described on the attached Additions
Form SR -5(A) to the secondary system of state highways, pursuant to §33.1-229, Code
of Virginia, and the Department's Subdivision Street Requirements, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, this Board guarantees a clear and unrestricted
right-of-way, as described, and any necessary easements for cuts, fills and drainage,
and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a certified copy of this resolution be
forwarded to the resident Engineer for the Virginia Department of Transportation.
Moved by: Supervisor McNamara
Seconded by: None Required
Yeas: Supervisors, McNamara, Church, Wray, Altizer, Flora
Nays: None
A py Teste.
Diane S. Childers, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
pc: Arnold Covey, Director, Department of Community Development
Virginia Department of Transportation
File
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Resolution 120704-6.b adopted
by the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors by a unanimous recorded vote on Tuesday,
December 7, 2004.
Brenda J. Holton, Deputy Clerk
..Q
C
O
U
d
c
O
METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT REPRESENT A
COMPOSITE OF DEEDS, PLATS, AND CALCULATED INFORMATION AND DO NOT REFLECT
4423
Length: 0.1877 Miles
No. of Homes Served: 20
TAX MAP NO.___ 55_06 ------- SCALE:__ 1__ "-200'__
PLAT SHOWING
Aceceptance of Great Glen into
the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System
PREPARED BY: ROANOKE COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: -11-19-04
METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT REPRESENT A
COMPOSITE OF DEEDS, PLATS, AND CALCULATED INFORMATION AND DO NOT REFLECT
31 Ac.
Length: 0.1045 Miles
No. of Homes Served: 13
55.06 ------ SCALE:___ "=200' —
TAX MAP NO. --- 1 2 0 0'
PLAT SHOWING
Aceceptance of Celtic Circle into
the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System
PREPARED BY: ROANOKE COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DATE: -11_ 19-04
METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT REPRESENT A
COMPOSITE OF DEEDS, PLATS, AND CALCULATED INFORMATION AND DO NOT REFLECT
Length: 0.1352 Miles
No. of Homes Served: 18
TAX MAP NO.___55_06 1 "-200'
— SCALE:____-_
PLAT SHOWING
Aceceptance of Celtic Circle into
the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary System
PREPARED BY: ROANOKE COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
91 Ac.
DATE: -11-19-04
ACTION NO. A -120704-6.c
ITEM NO. J-5
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 7, 2004
AGENDA ITEM: Request from the Library to accept and appropriate funds in
the amount of $1,385 from the Bill and Melinda Gates
Foundation to purchase a computer.
SUBMITTED BY: Diana L. Rosapepe
Director of Library Services
APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Roanoke County Public Library has been awarded a grant from the Bill and Melinda Gates
Foundation in the amount of $1,385 to purchase a computer for the Mount Pleasant
Branch Library. This grant is part of the Foundation's "Staying Connected" initiative and
represents the final stage of the nationwide United States Library Program, which brought
thousands of computers to libraries throughout Virginia in 2001 and made Internet access
readily available to citizens across the Commonwealth. Although the Gates Foundation
has essentially completed the U.S.L.P., it offered equipment grants to a group of smaller
libraries that had received either 1 or 2 computers in 2001. Eligible libraries were allowed
to request funding for one additional new computer. In the case of the Roanoke County
Public Library system, only the Mount Pleasant Branch Library qualified for the grant.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No additional funding will be required.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends acceptance and appropriation of the $1,385 to the Library's budget.
VOTE:
Supervisor McNamara motion to approve staff recommendation
Motion Approved
cc: File
Diana L. Rosapepe, Director of Library Services
Rebecca Owens, Director, Finance
2
Yes
No
Abs
Mr. McNamara
®
❑
❑
Mr. Church
®
❑
❑
Mr. Wray
®
❑
❑
Mr. Altizer
®
❑
❑
Mr. Flora
®
❑
❑
cc: File
Diana L. Rosapepe, Director of Library Services
Rebecca Owens, Director, Finance
2
ACTION NO. A -120704-6.d
ITEM NO. J-6
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 7, 2004
AGENDA ITEM: Request from the Library to accept and appropriate funds in
the amount of $15,100 from the Friends of the Library
SUBMITTED BY: Diana L. Rosapepe
Director of Library Services
APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Friends of the Roanoke County Public Library has donated $15,100 to support
programs and services at all County libraries. The Library plans to purchase additional
shelving and replace worn furniture at the Vinton branch library, as well as furnishings for
the Bent Mountain Branch Library expansion. The money will also be used to buy the
workstations and other peripheral equipment necessary to create children's computing
areas throughout the system. The balance of the donation will be invested in technology
training for the public service staff.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No additional funding will be required.
ALTERNATIVES:
None.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends acceptance and appropriation of the $15,100 to the Library's budget.
VOTE:
Supervisor McNamara motion to approve staff recommendation
Motion Approved
cc: File
Diana L. Rosapepe, Director of Library Services
Rebecca Owens, Director, Finance
2
Yes
No
Abs
Mr. McNamara
®
❑
❑
Mr. Church
®
❑
❑
Mr. Wray
®
❑
❑
Mr. Altizer
®
❑
❑
Mr. Flora
®
❑
❑
cc: File
Diana L. Rosapepe, Director of Library Services
Rebecca Owens, Director, Finance
2
ACTION NO. A -120704-6.e
ITEM NO. J-7
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 7, 2004
AGENDA ITEM: Request from the Fire and Rescue Department to accept and
appropriate a grant in the amount of $6,924 from the Virginia
Department of Health for the purchase of extrication
equipment.
SUBMITTED BY: Richard E. Burch, Jr.
Fire and Rescue Chief
APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge, Jr.
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Virginia Department of Health, Office of Emergency Medical Services, awarded the
Fire and Rescue Department a 50 % matching grant in the amount of $6,924 to purchase
extrication equipment. The new extrication equipment is being placed on a piece of front
line fire apparatus that currently does not have this type of equipment on it.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The Fire and Rescue Department has budgeted funds for the 50% match that the state
requires for the grant.
ALTERNATIVES:
The Fire and Rescue Department will not be able to purchase the new extrication
equipment without the matching funds from the state.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the acceptance and appropriation of the grant funds in the amount of
$6,924 from the Virginia Department of Health to the Fire and Rescue Department's
budget.
VOTE:
Supervisor McNamara motion to approve staff recommendation
Motion Approved
cc: File
Richard Burch, Fire and Rescue Chief
Rebecca Owens, Director, Finance
Yes
No
Abs
Mr. McNamara
®
❑
❑
Mr. Church
®
❑
❑
Mr. Wray
®
❑
❑
Mr. Altizer
®
❑
❑
Mr. Flora
®
❑
❑
cc: File
Richard Burch, Fire and Rescue Chief
Rebecca Owens, Director, Finance
ACTION NO. A -120704-6.f
ITEM NO. J-8
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 7, 2004
AGENDA ITEM: Request from the Fire and Rescue Department to accept and
appropriate a grant in the amount of $13,000 from the Virginia
Department of Health for the purchase of cardiac heart
monitors.
SUBMITTED BY: Richard E. Burch, Jr.
Fire and Rescue Chief
APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge, Jr.
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Virginia Department of Health, Office of Emergency Medical Services, awarded the
Fire and Rescue Department a 50 % matching grant in the amount of $13,000 to purchase
cardiac heart monitors. The cardiac heart monitors will give Roanoke County new
technology in cardiac defibrillation.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The Fire and Rescue Department has budgeted funds for the 50% match that the state
requires for the grant.
ALTERNATIVES:
The Fire and Rescue Department will not be able to purchase the new cardiac heart
monitors without the matching funds from the state.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the acceptance and appropriation of the grant funds in the amount of
$13,000 from the Virginia Department of Health to the Fire and Rescue Department's
budget.
VOTE:
Supervisor McNamara motion to approve staff recommendation
Motion Approved
cc: File
Richard Burch, Fire and Rescue Chief
Rebecca Owens, Director, Finance
Yes
No
Abs
Mr. McNamara
®
❑
❑
Mr. Church
®
❑
❑
Mr. Wray
®
❑
❑
Mr. Altizer
®
❑
❑
Mr. Flora
®
❑
❑
cc: File
Richard Burch, Fire and Rescue Chief
Rebecca Owens, Director, Finance
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, ON
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 7, 2004
RESOLUTION 120704-6.g CONCURRING WITH THE ADOPTION BY
THE WESTERN VIRGINIA WATER AUTHORITY OF A MANDATORY
WATER AND SEWER CONNECTION POLICY PURSUANT TO
VIRGINIA CODE § 15.2-5137
WHEREAS, on July 1, 2004, the Western Virginia Water Authority assumed all
water and sewer utility functions from the County of Roanoke, Virginia; and
WHEREAS, the Western Virginia Water Authority has adopted a policy on
November 18, 2004, relating to mandatory water and sewer connections pursuant to
Virginia Code § 15.2-5137; and
WHEREAS, the Western Virginia Water Authority has asked the County of
Roanoke for a concurring resolution pursuant to Virginia Code § 15.2-5137(A).
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County that:
1. The County hereby resolves and concurs with the mandatory water and
sewer connection policy adopted by the Western Virginia Water Authority on November
18, 2004 pursuant to Virginia Code § 15.2-5137.
2. The Clerk is directed to forward a copy of this resolution to the appropriate
officials at the Western Virginia Water Authority.
On motion of Supervisor McNamara to adopt the resolution, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Church, Wray, Altizer, Flora
NAYS: None
AOPY TESTE.
Diane S. Childers
Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney
Bruce Grant, Director, Finance & Administration,
Western Virginia Water Authority
Mary Parker, Clerk, Roanoke City Council
2
RESOLUTION X25 r1l def
OF THE
WESTERNNN VIRGINIA WATER AUTHORITY
Approving a Mandatory Water Connection Policv
and a Mandatory Sewer Connection Policy
WHEREAS, the Western Virginia Water Authority (the "Authority"), a public service
authority fortned and existing in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 51 of Title 15.2
of the Code of Vireinia, 1950, as amended, the Virginia Water and Waste Authorities Act
15.2-5100.15.2-5158 (the "Act"); and
WHEREAS, there was presented to the Board of Directors of the Western Virginia
Water. Authority policies and procedures setting out the terms of the Authority's Mandatory
Water Connection Policy and the Authority's Mandatory Sewer Connection Policy.
TOW TI-IEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the iAlestern Virginia Water Author]
do hereby adopt the following policies:
Mandatory Water Connection Poliev
Upon the acquisition or construction of any r
water system by the Authority, the owner, tenara:t,
Of Occupant of each lot or parcel of land (i) which abuts a street or other public right of way
which contains, or is adjacent to an easement containing a wager nriain or a water system and
(ii) upon which, a building has been constructed for residential, commercial or industrial use,
shall connect the building with the water main, and shalt cease to use any other source of
water supply for domestic use. All such connections shall be made in accordance with rules
and regulations adopted by the Authority, which may provide for a reasonable charge xok-
makilig such a connection.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, those persons having a domestic supply or source of potable
water shall not be required to discontinue the use of such water. However, persons not
served by a water supply system, as defined in Virginia Code Section 15.2-214.9, producing
potable water meeting the standards established by the 'Virginia Department of Health may
be required to pay a connection fee, an availability fee and an extension fee, and a monthly
nonuser Service charge, which charge shall not be more than that proportion of the lm.inirnurrl
monthly user charge, imposed by the Authority, as debt service bears to rvithe total operating
and debt service costs, or any combination of such fees and charges.
I:.— 'I ....04 , J _<. �=i•./ s -`�.G A c. iJ �� it ... <1
MandatorySewer Connection Policy
Upon the acquisition or construction of any sewer system by the Authority, the o -caner,
tenant, or occupant of each lot or parcel of land (i) which abuts -a street or other public right
Of way which contains, or is adjacent to an easement containing a sanitary sewer which is a
part of or �� hich is or may be served by such sewer s ) upon which a building
system, and (ii
has been. constructed for residential, commercial or industrial use, shall connect the building
with the sanitary sewer, and shall cease to use any other method for the disposal of sewage,
sewage waste or other polluting matter. All such connections shall be made in accordance
With rules and regulations adopted by the Authority, which may provide for a reasonable
charge fvr making such a connection.
?Notwithstanding the foregoing, those persons having a private septic system or domestic
sev�age system meeting applicable standards established by the Virginia Department of
Health shall not be required under this chapter to discontinue the use of such system.
However, such persons may be required to pay a connection fee, an availability fee and an
extension fee, and a monthly nonuser service charge, which charge shall not be more than
that proportion of the minimum monthly user charge, imposed by the Authority, as debt
service bears to the total operating and debt service costs, or any combination of such fees
and charges.
The Board of Directors also recommends to the City Council of the City of Romaoke,
and to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County that each of such governing bodies adapt
a concurring resolution in the form presented to this meeting or such other form as shall be
decreed appropriate by such governing bodies.
AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the appropriate officers are hereby
authorized and directed to execute, deliver and file all documents, certificates and
instrumt-rits'and to take all such further action as may be necessary or desirable in connection
with and that are in conformity with the purposes and intent of this resolution.
This resolution shall take effect immediately.
Directors absent 3
Votes Aye 4
Votes Nay 0
-2-
C. 'I U e !? ,' - ." _,
CERTIFICATI®N
The undersigned secretary of the Western Virginia Water Authority does hereby
certify that the foregoing is a true, complete and correct Resolution adopted by a vote of a j
majority of the Directors of the Western Virginia Water Authority, present at a regular
meeting of the Board of Directors of the Western Virginia Water Authority duly called and
held NQ em ,r- 19 at which a quorum was present and acting throughout, and that
the sane has not been amended or rescinded and is in full force and effect as of the date of
this certification, A2,k-,mb,-,c l,' 2004,
(SEAL)
jJ'arn:T-h`u.rman, Secretary,
rn Virginia Water Authority
-3-
ACTION NO. A -120704-6.h
ITEM NO. J-10
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 7, 2004
AGENDA ITEM: Request from Parks, Recreation & Tourism Department to
accept and appropriate $20,792 from the Commonwealth of
Virginia for reimbursement for expenses incurred for the
construction of the Wolf Creek Greenway
SUBMITTED BY: Pete Haislip
Director of Parks, Recreation & Tourism
APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Parks, Recreation & Tourism Recreation Department received a Virginia Trails
reimbursable grant to renovate and complete the construction of the Wolf Creek
Greenway. This project has been completed and the Board is required to appropriate the
reimbursement of $20,792 from the Commonwealth of Virginia to the Parks and Recreation
account (102830/0860).
FISCAL IMPACT:
None. This transaction completes the project.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board accept and appropriate $20,792 from the Commonwealth
of Virginia to reimburse the Parks, Recreation & Tourism Department for expenses
incurred for the construction of the Wolf Creek Greenway.
VOTE:
Supervisor McNamara motion to approve staff recommendation
Motion Approved
cc: File
Pete Haislip, Director, Parks, Recreation & Tourism
Rebecca Owens, Director, Finance
2
Yes
No
Abs
Mr. McNamara
®
0
F -I
Mr. Church
®
F1
El
Mr. Wray
®
0
F -I
Mr. Altizer
®
E-1
F]
Mr. Flora
®
F
r -I
cc: File
Pete Haislip, Director, Parks, Recreation & Tourism
Rebecca Owens, Director, Finance
2
ACTION NO. A -120704-6.i
ITEM NO. J-11
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 7, 2004
AGENDA ITEM: Request from the Treasurer to amend the existing banking
services contract with SunTrust Bank to allow for lock box
operation
SUBMITTED BY:
APPROVED BY:
F. Kevin Hutchins
Treasurer
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The Unisys remittance processor which was purchased by the Treasurer's Office in
September 1994 needs to be replaced because it is difficult to obtain continued
maintenance support due to the lack of parts for this aging equipment. The maintenance
and software agreements for this equipment currently cost over $2,000 per month.
Although funds were placed into the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) last year for this
project, new equipment or a new procedure are mandatory now. Adding the lock box
services as a processing mechanism is within the authority and powers held by the
Treasurer and creates the need for a Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA) of these services.
Stewardship of funds for County residents and government is a top priority of the
Treasurer's Office.
A cost benefit analysis of a new machine versus the proposed cost of adding lock box
services to the existing banking services contract with SunTrust demonstrated that there
will be considerable cost savings to the County by adding the lock box services. A new
machine will cost $3,702 per month for 5 years ($199,765) with a new maintenance
contract needed after the expiration of this term. Lock box services will cost approximately
$3,000 per month for 4 months of the year ($12,000).
The County currently operates under what SunTrust refers to as exception pricing with our
banking services. We will continue to have the same pricing built into the lock box
services. We are able to accomplish this fee schedule since we will be processed by the
SunTrust Lock Box platform and not the third party Regulus platform which currently
operates the lock box for the newly formed Western Virginia Water Authority. This
provides a substantial pricing advantage.
There will be added benefits of salary savings from shifting an employee to other functions
and the extra collections that can be accomplished with this move. We will also save the
cost for a part-time employee during tax season to operate the machine.
Section 17-14 "Modification of Contracts" of the Code for the County Of Roanoke states
that prior approval is needed when a change in contract exceeds either 25% or $10,000;
therefore, Board approval of this amendment is being requested.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No additional funding for these services will be required since funds are currently
budgeted for the maintenance agreement of the current machine.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board approve an amendment to the existing banking services
contract with Sun Trust to include additional services estimated to be around $12,000 per
year.
VOTE:
Supervisor McNamara motion to approve staff recommendation
Motion Approved
M. File
Kevin Hutchins, Treasurer
Diane Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer
Rebecca Owens, Director, Finance
VI
Yes
No
Abs
Mr. McNamara
®
❑
❑
Mr. Church
®
❑
❑
Mr. Wray
®
❑
❑
Mr. Altizer
®
❑
❑
Mr. Flora
®
❑
❑
M. File
Kevin Hutchins, Treasurer
Diane Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer
Rebecca Owens, Director, Finance
VI
ACTION NO. A-120704-6.1
ITEM NO. J-12
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 7, 2004
AGENDA ITEM: Request to approve an agreement with Clearbrook Volunteer
Fire Department regarding the disposition of vehicles and
outstanding loan balances
SUBMITTED BY: Richard E. Burch, Jr.
Fire and Rescue Chief
APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge, Jr.
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
In an effort to assist Clearbrook Volunteer Fire Department in resolving its financial
difficulties, Roanoke County Fire and Rescue proposes paying off loan balances on two of
Clearbook's vehicles. This would clear the title to these vehicles and allow them to be
sold.
Clearbrook will utilize a third party to sell these vehicles on behalf of Clearbrook Volunteer
Fire Department.
Upon the sale of these vehicles, Clearbrook Volunteer Fire Department will reimburse the
Roanoke County Fire and Rescue Department for the loan amount and use remaining
funds to pay off debts incurred by Clearbrook Volunteer Fire Department.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The Fire and Rescue Department will use budgeted funds allocated toward the purchase
of new vehicles to pay off the existing vehicle loan balances of approximately $17,000.00.
The amount will be reimbursed by Clearbrook once the vehicles are sold.
ALTERNATIVES:
(1) Authorize and approve this proposed agreement. This alternative will assist the
volunteers in promptly addressing their financial problems.
(2) Allow Clearbrook Volunteer Fire Department to resolve its financial problems by
itself without County assistance. It could attempt to raise the money to pay off the
loans. Due to the financial situation of this organization, this would be a long term
endeavor and only further delay the reconciliation of its financial status.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board authorize the County Administrator or his designee to
execute an agreement with Clearbrook Volunteer Fire Department that approves Roanoke
County Fire and Rescue:
(i) paying off Clearbrook Volunteer Fire Department's vehicle loans to clear title
(ii) Clearbrook accepting title to said vehicles
(iii) selling said vehicles via a third party
(iv) reimbursing the Fire and Rescue Department upon sale of the vehicles, and
(v) authorizing the payment of any remaining funds toward other existing debts
incurred by Clearbrook Volunteer Fire Department.
This agreement will be drafted by the County Attorney.
i•
VOTE:
Supervisor McNamara motion to approve staff recommendation
Motion Approved
cc: File
Richard Burch, Fire & Rescue Chief
Diane Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer
Rebecca Owens, Director, Finance
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
3
Yes
No
Abs
Mr. McNamara
®
❑
❑
Mr. Church
®
❑
❑
Mr. Wray
®
❑
❑
Mr. Altizer
®
❑
❑
Mr. Flora
®
❑
❑
cc: File
Richard Burch, Fire & Rescue Chief
Diane Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer
Rebecca Owens, Director, Finance
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
3
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 7, 2004
RESOLUTION 120704-7 CERTIFYING THE CLOSED MEETING WAS
HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened a
closed meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance
with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.2-3712 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the
Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such closed meeting was
conducted in conformity with Virginia law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge:
1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements
by Virginia law were discussed in the closed meeting which this certification resolution
applies, and
2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the
closed meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of
Roanoke County, Virginia.
On motion of Supervisor McNamara to adopt the resolution, and carried by the
following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors McNamara, Church, Wray, Altizer, Flora
NAYS: None
A POPY TESTE:
��Q) �� 1 6��
Diane S. Childers
Clerk to the Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Closed Meeting File
ACTION NO. A-120704-8
ITEM NO. S-1
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: December 7, 2004
AGENDA ITEM: Request to Exercise Options for the Acquisition of Land for the
Location of a Regional Jail Facility
SUBMITTED BY: John M. Chambliss, Jr.
Asst. County Administrator
APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
At the November 16, 2004 meeting of the Board of Supervisors, staff was authorized to
proceed with obtaining options on up to five sites identified as possible locations for a new
regional jail that would serve Roanoke County and the city of Salem along with
Montgomery and Franklin Counties. (Both Montgomery and Franklin Counties have
provided Roanoke County with letters of intent to participate in the regional jail facility.) On
November 24, the Board was provided information on the twelve sites under consideration
and the order in which they had each been ranked. A Community Meeting was held on
Tuesday, November 30 at the Salem Civic Center to provide citizens with information on
the recommended sites and the need for a new jail. The meeting was also an opportunity
to receive comments, questions and concerns from the community.
A Jail Study Committee comprised of the Sheriff, a City/County administrative
representative, and senior corrections officials from each participating locality have been
working to develop the prerequisite studies required by the Department of Corrections
which must be filed on or before March 1, 2005. The Program Plan is site specific and
includes other critical information including schematic drawings of the floor plans, a site
plan including utilities, traffic patterns, drainage, development concerns, site studies, etc.,
projected operating budgets for the first six years, a financing plan, and any operating
agreements among partner agencies. The process and state imposed schedule for this
study are necessary to be considered for financial participation by the state in the capital
funding for the facility. If this deadline is missed, the next opportunity will be to file the
application prior to March 1, 2007 for that funding cycle.
The Community Based Corrections Plan is the second required study which considers the
inmate population of each of the participating localities, the availability of corrections
programs and diversion programs which influence the amount of time the inmate may be in
the facility, and projections of the inmate population for ten, fifteen and twenty years into
the future. These projections determine the size of the new facility to be built. The three
jails currently in use plan to remain open to serve as the delivery point for arrested
persons, holding them until they are sentenced or as long as they are participating in a
local work program. The regional jail will house sentenced inmates (normally those with
less than two years to serve), special population inmates (females, special physical needs,
etc.) and medical cases.
The Jail Study Committee established set criteria by which to evaluate each of the
potential sites. These criteria include the following:
- The willingness of the Seller or current owner of the property to sell the property
at this time.
- The proximity of the site to the four Court Systems.
- The proximity of the site to the potential partner localities and the ability to easily
get inmates or visitors to the facility.
- How the neighboring properties are being used and the impact that this type of
facility might have on the community are two of the most significant factors.
- The availability of utilities (water, sewer, gas).
- The general lay of the land (topography) and other features that enhance or
hinder development.
- Proximity to major highway for access to the facility.
- Other limitations (or lack thereof) which could hinder development of the site.
- Asking or marketing price of the marketed sites.
At a Community Meeting on November 30, six other sites were mentioned as possible sites
for consideration. A preliminary review of these sites has been made, data is being
gathered, and the evaluation of these new sites will be completed using the same criteria
shown above which was used for the first twelve sites. Attachment A shows the newly
recommended sites (A -F) and the basic data sheets of each.
Attachment B is a matrix of the criteria for the ranking of the subject properties.
Attachment C is a list of data regarding each of the twelve original sites considered. Some
of the sites were less desirable than others due to limitation of the developable area,
adverse topography, or compatibility with the surrounding community.
Staff developed a Question and Answer document (Attachment D) which was distributed at
the Community Meeting to help answer questions for the community and also to open
2
dialogue to other issues that should be considered. When developing major projects in the
past, the County has offered neighboring properties a property value protection program to
assure that there was no loss of property value when the property is sold. It is
recommended that we work with the community selected and to develop a similar program
for this project to protect the surrounding community.
Attachment E includes a schedule and outlines certain tasks that must be accomplished in
order for this project to be included in the upcoming funding cycle by the State. Being a
regional facility, the project could be eligible for reimbursement of up to 50% of the
allowable capital costs. The participating local governments anticipate establishing a jail
authority which could issue the bonded debt for this facility and oversee the jail operation.
The plan and documents must be received at the Department of Corrections prior to March
1, 2005 to be considered in this funding cycle.
Staff plans to bring a recommendation to the Board of Supervisors at your meeting on
December 7 authorizing the establishment of one or more options for the site(s) for the
regional jail. An option is the first step in the process for acquiring real estate. There will
be numerous opportunities for the public to provide input before a site may be purchased
or developed. An option agreement pays a deposit to the land owner to hold the property
for our consideration. We are then allowed to begin the due diligence studies including
environmental testing of the site, geological and land evaluation, and any other item
necessary to assure that the site is suitable. If a problem is encountered, the owner may
be asked to remediate the situation or the purchaser may cancel the option without
purchasing the property.
Assuming the testing results are favorable and all other conditions of the option agreement
are met, the County may choose to proceed with the purchase of the property. To
purchase the property, the County will have the first and second reading of an ordinance
and conduct a public hearing on the matter before the purchase. Before this particular
project can proceed with the development of the site, a 2232 review (community plan), a
re -zoning request, and a special use permit request must be filed and heard by the
Planning Commission and also the Board of Supervisors with the appropriate public
hearings.
The request on December 7 will be to authorize the signing of the option agreement and to
determine the amount of funding for the option fee. An appropriation request will be
placed on the December 21 agenda after the required notice.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that we move forward with the selection of a site(s) so that we can meet
the March 1, 2005 deadline.
3
VOTE:
Supervisor McNamara amended motion to delay action until January 11, 2005, at a
7:00 p.m. session
Motion Approved
cc: File
John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator
Gerald Holt, Sheriff
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
EI
Yes
No
Abs
Mr. McNamara
®
❑
❑
Mr. Church
®
❑
❑
Mr. Wray
®
❑
❑
Mr. Altizer
®
❑
❑
Mr. Flora
®
❑
❑
cc: File
John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator
Gerald Holt, Sheriff
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
EI