The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2/25/1992 - Adopted Board RecordsAT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1992 RESOLUTION 22592-1 OF CONGRATULATIONS TO NED DOWLING UPON WINNING THE ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOL LOGO ART CONTEST WHEREAS, in 1991, Roanoke County in a contest among County employees adopted as a slogan, Roanoke County, Heart of the Blue Ridge, representing both the geographic location of Roanoke County and the caring nature of its citizens and employees, and WHEREAS, at that time, it was determined that a similar contest should be conducted through the Roanoke County Schools for a visual design that would portray the image of the slogan, and WHEREAS, an art contest was sponsored by the Roanoke County Schools in which there were 31 entries in the contest from high school art students, and WHEREAS, Ned Dowling, a student at Cave Spring High School was chosen by the judges as the winner of the contest. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, expresses its sincere congratulations to NED DOWLING for winning the Roanoke County School Logo Art Contest, and FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors supports the future use of the slogan and visual design by the County in ways that may be deemed appropriate. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. len, Clerk cc: File Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Resolutions of Congratulations File Dr. Bayes Wilson, Superintendent, Roanoke County Schools (2..;7. 0 FIRST PLACE NED DOWLING CAVE SPRING HIGH SCHOOL AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1992 RESOLUTION 22592-2 OF CONGRATULATIONS TO KIM HAYSLETT, UPON PLACING HONORABLE MENTION IN THE ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOL LOGO ART CONTEST WHEREAS, in 1991, Roanoke County in a contest among County employees adopted as a slogan, Roanoke County, Heart of the Blue Ridge, representing both the geographic location of Roanoke County and the caring nature of its citizens and employees, and WHEREAS, at that time, it was determined that a similar contest should be conducted through the Roanoke County Schools for a visual design that would portray the image of the slogan, and WHEREAS, an art contest was sponsored by the Roanoke County Schools in which there were 31 entries in the contest from high school art students, and WHEREAS, Kim Hayslett, a student at Cave Spring High School was chosen by the judges to receive Honorable Mention in the contest. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, expresses its congratulations to KIM HAYSLETT for winning Honorable Mention in the Roanoke County School Logo Art Contest, and FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors supports the future use of the visual design by the County in ways that may be deemed appropriate. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. A161en, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Resolutions of Congratulations File Dr. Bayes Wilson, Superintendent, Roanoke County Schools HONORABLE MENTION KDA HAYSLET17 CAVE SPRING HIGH SCHOOL mpll k, ( j IL covmm AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1992 RESOLUTION 22592-3 OF CONGRATULATIONS TO JASON FIZER UPON PLACING HONORABLE MENTION IN THE ROANOKE COUNTY SCHOOL LOGO ART CONTEST WHEREAS, in 1991, Roanoke County in a contest among County employees adopted as a slogan, Roanoke County, Heart of the Blue Ridge, representing both the geographic location of Roanoke County and the caring nature of its citizens and employees, and WHEREAS, at that time, it was determined that a similar contest should be conducted through the Roanoke County Schools for a visual design that would portray the image of the slogan, and WHEREAS, an art contest was sponsored by the Roanoke County Schools in which there were 31 entries in the contest from high school art students, and WHEREAS, Jason Fizer, a student at Northside High School was chosen by the judges to receive Honorable Mention in the contest. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia expresses its congratulations to JASON FIZER for winning Honorable Mention in the Roanoke County School Logo Art Contest, and FURTHER, the Board of Supervisors supports the future use of the visual design by the County in ways that may be deemed appropriate. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Resolutions of Congratulations File Dr. Bayes Wilson, Superintendent, Roanoke County Schools 0-1 A-22592-4 ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER - I AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 25, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Reconsideration of County Position on APCO Power Line COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: At the February 11, 1992 meeting, the Board of Supervisors withdrew their opposition and voted to take a neutral position on the proposed Appalachian Power Line. Following the meeting, Supervisor Kohinke submitted the attached letter requesting reconsideration of the matter. Also attached are comments from the Planning Commission. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: I have asked Appalachian Power officials to attend the meeting in case the Board has questions. There will also be citizens at the meeting who may wish to speak. There are several alternatives if the Board chooses to reconsider this matter. 1. The Board could choose to leave the decision as it is and remain neutral. 2. The Board could choose to assume the role of intervenor. In doing so, the County would take no formal action but representatives of the Board or staff would attend the meetings of the SCC to express our concerns. This, however, would limit the Board's involvement. We would not be allowed to provide data or expert witnesses to support our position. Neither would we be on the mailing list for notices or information. 3. The Board could choose to leave on record the letter of opposition previously submitted. The County submitted two such letters: one on behalf of the Roanoke County Resource Authority, and the other on behalf of the County. Since the Authority is now in place with representatives from other localities, they should be the ones to address the impact on the landfill. Attached is a letter from APCO assuring us there will be no detrimental impact on its operation or life. 4. Fully oppose the process with sworn testimony and possibly expert witnesses. With major construction projects of this type, Roanoke County should stay informed and we should do whatever we can to minimize the impact to the community. This can only be done if the Board of Supervisors chooses Alterative #3 or #4. The deadline for opposition is May 18, 1992. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: I prefer Alternative #3, leaving in place the letter of opposition sent to the SCC. This keeps us on mailing lists for notices of meetings, keeps us informed when the exact route will be determined, and does not require significant staff time. If the Board concurs, The County Attorney's office will prepare a one to two page summary that will incorporate the Board's position. A draft of the position will be brought back to the Board for approval before sending to the SCC. Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: (1) Edward G. Kohinke, No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Sr. motion for reconsideration Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred ( ) Kohinke x To ( ) Minnix x Nickens x (2) Edward G. Kohinke, Sr. Motion to approve Alternative #3 AYES: Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: Johnson (3) Harry C. Nickens requested reconsideration of this item at the March 10, 1992 meeting cc: File Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Don Myers, Assistant County Administrator John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1992 RESOLUTION 22592-5 APPROVING THE ROANOKE REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION BUDGET FOR FY 1992-1993, UPON CERTAIN TERMS AND CONDITIONS WHEREAS, Section 24.B of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Act and Section 17.(a) of the contract between the City of Roanoke, Roanoke County, and the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission provide that the Commission shall prepare and submit its operating budget for the forthcoming fiscal year to the Board of Supervisors of the County and City Council of the City; and WHEREAS, by report dated February 13, 1992, a copy of which is on file in the office of the Clerk to the Board, the Vice - Chairman of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission has submitted a request that the County approve the FY 1992-1993 budget of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia that the FY 1992-1993 budget and proposed capital expenditures for the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission as set forth in the February 13, 1992, report of the Commission Vice -Chairman, a copy of which is incorporated by reference herein, is hereby APPROVED, and the County Administrator and the Clerk are authorized to execute and attest, respectively, on behalf of the County, any documentation, in form approved by the County Attorney, necessary to evidence said approval. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Reta Busher, Director, Management W. Robert Herbert, Chairman, Commission & Budget Roanoke Regional Airport Mary F. Parker, Clerk, Roanoke City Council Jacqueline L. Shuck, Executive Director, Roanoke Regional Airport Airport Commission W. Robert Herbert, Chairman Bob L. Johnson, Vice Chairman Joel M. Schlanger 1R. Odell Ninnix Kit B. Kiser Jacqueline L. Shuck, Executive Director Honorable Chairman and Members Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Roanoke, Virginia Honorable Mayor and Members Roanoke City Council Roanoke, Virginia Re Dear Mrs. Bowles and Gentlemen: :Z)- 2 5202 Aviation Drive Roanoke, Virginia 24012 (703) 362-1999 FAX ( 703) 563-4838 February 13, 1992 Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Fiscal Year 1992-1993 Budget and Proposed Capital Expenditures In accordance with the requirements of the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Act, and the Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Contract dated January 28, 1987, submitted for your approval are the Airport Commission's 1992-1993 proposed operating and capital budget, as well as a separate listing of proposed capital expenditures which are expected to exceed $100,000 and are intended to benefit five or more future accounting periods. The Commission has been advised by bond counsel that formal approval of the budget by resolution of each of the participating political subdivisions would be appropriate. The capital expenditure list also requires formal approval. Therefore, on behalf of the Commission, the fiscal year 1992-1993 budget and the proposed capital expenditures are enclosed for your approval by resolu- tion. I will be pleased to respond to any questions or comments that you may have with regard to this matter. On behalf of the Commission, thank you very much for your help and cooperation. BLJ:JLS:csp Enclosures cc: Members, Roanoke Regional Airport Commission Mary H. Allen, Deputy Clerk, Roanoke Co. Board of Supervisors Mary F. Parker, Clerk, Roanoke City Council Paul M. Mahoney, Roanoke County Attorney Wilburn C. Dibling, Roanoke City Attorney Heman A. Marshall, III, General Counsel, RRAC budget.ltr 10 -Feb -92 ATTACHMENT I a ROANOKE REGIONAL AIRPORT PROPOSED FY 92-93 BUDGET 1991-92 Budgeted 1992-93 Budgeted EXPENSE BUDGET Expenditures Expenditures 1. Ooerations and Maintenance Exoenses A. Salaries, Wages and Benefits B. Operating Expenditures C. City Services D. Other Projects Total Operations and Maintenance $1,161,848 1,148, 279 594,647 88,000 2,992,774 $1,209,301 1,165, 895 592,500 41,000 3,008,696 2. Non -Operating Expenses Airfield $860,296 A. Interest 633,721 613,482 B. Debt Service 258,768 266,073 Total Non -Operating 892,489 2,875,667 879,555 3. Capital Expenses 159,900 124,525 A. Capital Projects and Equipment 75,000 81,500 Total Capital Expenses 75,000 1 81,500 Total Budgeted Expenditures $3,960,263 $3,969,751 1991-92 Budget 1992-93 Projected REVENUE PROJECTIONS Revenues Revenues 1. Operating Revenues A. Airfield $860,296 $858,174 B. General Aviation 107,356 112,225 C. Terminal Related 2,830,564 2,875,667 D. Other Revenues 159,900 124,525 Total Projected Operating Revenues 3,958,116 3,970,591 2. Non -Operating Revenues A. Interest from Debt Service 63,000 48,000 B. Interest on Investments 170,000 200,000 C. Roanoke County Base Service Fee 264,640 264,640 Total Projected Non-Operting Revenues 497,640 1 512,640 Total Projected Revenue $4,455,756 1 $4,483,231 ATTACHMENT II PROPOSED CAPITAL EXPENDITURES (For projects expected to exceed $100,000 in cost and intended to benefit five or more accounting periods.) A. Projects: 1. Professional Services for Airfield Signage a) Description: Acquire professional services necessary to develop an airfield signage plan acceptable to the FAA and to prepare bid specifi- cations necessary to implement the plan. b) Justification: New federal aviation regulations require the development and submission of an airfield signage plan by November 1, 1992. The plan, once approved by the FAA, must be imple- mented by January 1, 1994. Est. $ 160,000 2. General Aviation Site Improvements a) Description: Construction of general aviation apron and taxilanes, including installation of storm sewers, access road and parking area, and the grading of future construction sites will be under- taken on approximately 5.6 acres of pre- viously undeveloped land in the general aviation area. b) Justification: This project will provide the infrastructure necessary to permit and encourage the development of up to two sets of T -hangars and up to three cor- porate hangars in an undeveloped section of the general aviation area. This devel- opment is in accordance with the 1985 Airport Master Plan and with the General Aviation Site and Redevelopment Plan adop- ted by the Commission in 1990. Est. $1,082,100 3. Professional Engineering Services for Air Cargo Ramp a) Description: Acquire professional en- gineering services necessary to perform tests and surveys, as well as to design and oversee bidding, for the construction of ramp for air cargo operations. Page Two z -'Z b) Justification: While the 1985 Airport Master Plan recommended new and larger air cargo facilities, the General Aviation Plan adopted by the Commission recommended that cargo operations be removed from the general aviation area. Increased ramp space for cargo operations, which now account for almost one -forth (1/4) of all landed weights, is currently needed. Est. $ 300,000 Total Estimate $1,542,100 B. Funding Sources: Federal Airport Improvement Program Grant Funds Commonwealth Aviation Grant Funds Commission Funds City and County Funds $1,193,040 $ 239,480 $ 109,580 $ -0- Total Funding $1,542,100 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1992 RESOLUTION 22592-6 APPROVING THE ROANOKE VALLEY RESOURCE AUTHORITY BUDGET FOR THE FIVE MONTH PERIOD ENDING JUNE 301 1992, UPON CERTAIN TERMS AND CONDITIONS WHEREAS, Section 5.9 of the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority Members Use Agreement provides that the Authority shall prepare and submit its operating budget for the forthcoming fiscal year to the Board of Supervisors of the County, the City Council of the City of Roanoke, and the Town Council of the Town of Vinton; and WHEREAS, by report dated February 10, 1992, a copy of which is on file in the office of the Clerk of the Board, the Chairman of the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority has submitted a request that the County approve the budget of the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority for the five month period ending June 30, 1992. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia that the budget for the five month period ending June 30, 1992 for the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority as set forth in the February 10, 1992, report of the Authority Chairman, a copy of which is incorporated by reference herein, is hereby APPROVED, and the County Administrator and the Clerk are authorized to execute and attest, respectively, on behalf of the County, any documentation, in form approved by the County Attorney, necessary to evidence said approval. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. A -en, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Gardner Smith, Chairman, Roanoke Valley Resource Authority John Hubbard, Assistant County Administrator �-3 p0AINV /� '4AMERi9vanukr 'I1' DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES 1979 18 E50 88 1989 SFSQUICENTENN�P~ BUILDINGS MAINTENANCE SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT `1 BeautifulBeginning COMMUNICATIONS GARDNER W. SMITH DIRECTOR February 10, 1992 Mr. Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator County of Roanoke Post Office Box 29800 Roanoke, VA 24018-0798 Dear Mr. Hodge: KENNETH L. HARDESTY ASSISTANT DIRECTOR At the Roanoke Valley Resource Authority meeting held on February 4, 1992, the Authority Board approved a 5 -month budget for the period February through June 1992, for start up and operation of the Resource Authority. The 5 -month budget is broken down as follows: Personnel $ 52,095 Operating 101,060 Capital Equipment 32,000 TOTAL 185 155 As per the User Agreement dated October 23, 1991, it is requested that the Roanoke County Board of Supervisors approve the 5 -month budget as presented. GWS:wr ly, jar 7nerW. Smith, Chairman Roanoke Valley Resource Authority ROANOKE COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICE CENTER 1216 KESSLER MILL ROAD • SALEM. VIRGINIA 24153 • (703) 387-6200 ACTION NUMBER A-22592-7 ITEM NUMBER D-4 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 25, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Approval of Recommendations from the Smoking Committee regarding the Smoking Policy COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND On December 17, 1991, the Board of Supervisors adopted a new smoking policy by a vote of 3-1-1. The policy, as it was adopted by the Board, was effective January 1, 1992, and prohibited smoking in all County owned and County leased buildings. The policy would be adhered to by all County staff, volunteers and the public. The purpose of the policy was to address the documented health effects of smoking, and particularly, the effects of second hand smoke inhalation. That is the primary reason for the Clean Air Act, as well as the County Smoking policy. The Board directed that staff report back to the Board with the figures on percentage of County employees who smoke, recommended penalties for violations of the policy, and more specific recommendations for smoking cessation programs. At the January 28, 1992 Board meeting, staff submitted a report to the Board requesting an additional 30 days to work out some of the issues encountered during implementation of the policy. At that time we had received complaints from some of the staff and volunteers regarding the ability to enforce the policy. The Smoking Committee has been trying to develop the penalties for violation of the policy. Supervisor Nickens has recommended implementation in the form of an ordinance rather than a policy. The County Attorney's Office also feels that the policy, as adopted on December 17, 1991, is in conflict with the current ordinance (12490-4). If the Board of Supervisors wishes to keep the current policy in place, the ordinance will have to be amended. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Smoking Committee was expanded with the addition of three (3) 1 3-q volunteer fire and rescue personnel. A list of Committee members is attached. The Committee has met and the following issues were addressed: 1. The negative health hazards of smoking and second hand smoke inhalation. 2. The impact of smoking and second hand smoke to the County workers compensation and health insurance coverage, for volunteers as well as employees. 3. The fairness, consistency and uniformity in the application of any policy for employees, volunteers and visitors in County buildings, with unanimous agreement that employees and volunteers should be treated equally. 4. A uniform and progressive system of penalties for policy violations for employees, volunteer personnel and visitors in County buildings. 5. The ordinance adopted by the Board of Supervisors on December 4, 1990, to regulate smoking in accordance with the Virginia Indoor Clean Air Act. (A copy of this ordinance is attached.) 6. The uniformity of smoking policies in the Roanoke County Courthouse and County school buildings. Approximately 178 County employees (or 29%) presently smoke. Volunteer Fire and Rescue Committee members estimate approximately the same percentage of the Volunteer Fire and Rescue personnel presently smoke as well. FISCAL IMPACT The cost of reimbursing employees for smoking cessation programs was discussed by the Smoking Committee, and it was recommended that the County should compensate each employee or volunteer who enrolls and completes an approved smoking cessation program. The compensation recommended by the Committee would be up to $30.00 toward the cost of the smoking cessation class or program. It is estimated that approximately 50 employees or volunteers would participate and request reimbursement, for a cost of $1,500.00. It was suggested by the Committee that the Community Hospital of Roanoke Valley "Smokeless" program be the recommended cessation program. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Smoking Committee recommends adoption of a new Smoking Policy to prohibit smoking in those buildings under County control with the provisions that (1) one area wherever practical and safe may K , D) -Aq be designated as a smoking area, (2) provision for penalties be provided for non-compliance, and (3) reimbursement be approved for a smoking cessation program. The policy would apply to all employees, volunteers, and visitors in County buildings. 1. DESIGNATED SMOKING AREAS The Facilities Management Team may designate one area in each County owned or occupied building as a smoking area. Decisions may be appealed to the Smoking Committee. 2. PENALTY PROVISIONS a. Employees who violate the County Smoking Policy would be given a reprimand, which could lead to suspension or dismissal, and the Handbook would be amended to reflect this. b. Volunteer Fire, Rescue and Police Auxiliary Personnel, who violate the County Smoking Policy, would forfeit points received towards the Roanoke County Length of Service Benefit Plan. A graduated scale will be developed by staff and the fire and rescue volunteers. C. Volunteer personnel not covered under the Roanoke County Length of Service Plan, who violate the County Smoking Policy, would be subject to loss of volunteer status. d. Visitors and other individuals for which penalties are not specifically addressed would be subject to the penalty provisions in the ordinance adopted by the Board of Supervisors, as may be amended, regulating smoking in accordance with the Virginia Indoor Clean Air Act. 3. REIMBURSEMENT FOR APPROVED SMOKING CESSATION PROGRAMS Reimburse employees or volunteers who satisfactorily complete an approved smoking cessation program. The reimbursement would not exceed $30.00 for each employee or volunteer. The Smoking Committee recommends that the Board of Supervisors adopt the recommendations, as listed above. This would bring the policy into conformation with the County ordinance. The Committee also recommends that the Roanoke County Courthouse and employees in the jail, be included in the policy adopted; that the County School Board be requested by the Board of Supervisors to adopt the provisions of this Smoking Policy. The Committee further recommends that funds in the amount of $1,500.00 be appropriated from the Board of Supervisors' Contingency Account for smoking cessation reimbursement for employees and volunteers. 3 APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. N; k na No Yes Abs Denied ( ) moved staff recommendations Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred Kohinke x To Minnix x Nickens x cc: File D. Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources George Simpson, Chairman, Facilities Management Team Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget Paul Mahoney, County Attorney 4 -D' q SMOKING COMMITTEE Mary Allen, Clerk, Board of Supervisors Steve Carpenter, Director of Parks & Recreation Keith Cook, Director of Human Resources Alice Carrico, Utility Department Steve Ferguson, Sheriffs Office Anne Marie Green, Public Information Officer Joe Obenshain, County Attorney's Office Mark Light, Fire & Rescue Phil Patrone, Police Department Dianne Roberson, Social Services Diana Rosapepe, Libraries Gardner Smith, Director of General Services T.E. Wagner, Fire Department, Mt. Pleasant L. R. Thomas, Fire Department, Back Creek Anita Hammerstrom, Human Resources Thomas Fuqua, Fire & Rescue Howard Hartman, County Rescue, Ft. Lewis ACTION NO. A-22592-8 ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 25, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Proposal to request Financial Participation from the Roanoke Valley Governments for the County's Therapeutics Program COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS•�'�/�4 �,Zz EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: At the January 28, 1992 meeting of the Board of Supervisors, staff presented a report requesting permission to seek financial assistance for the Therapeutics program offered by our Department of Parks and Recreation. The Board asked staff to consider expanding our request to cover each of the Roanoke Valley governments whose residents participate in our program and to bring our request back on February 25. The Therapeutics program offered by the County's Department of Parks and Recreation provides recreational and learning activities for handicapped residents across the Roanoke Valley. The program is currently funded by contributions from the General Fund of the County, Grants from the Mental Health Services program, fees paid by the participants, a small cash contribution from the City of Roanoke, and in-kind services (transportation, use of facilities, and supervisory assistance) provided by the City. Attachment A shows the levels of funding and participation in the program for 1991. Attachment B shows historical information related to this program. :The grants to the County are available because the therapeutics program is regional in nature and represents a program this department does well for the entire community. We should endeavor to provide services needed by our residents, yet avoid duplication of efforts. FISCAL IMPACT• The budget for the Therapeutics program will be presented with the other Fee type programs as a part of the Parks and Recreation budget. ,D -5 RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends that the County be authorized to submit a letter to the Roanoke Valley governments with documentation pointing out participation by residents of their community and requesting their financial assistance for the Therapeutics program. This assistance would help to ensure the uninterrupted service to the needs of this special population of our community. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, John M. Chambliss, Jr. Elmer C. Hodge Assistant Administrator County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) ACTION VOTE Motion by: Harry C. Ni_kPns No Yes Abs ent motion to approve staff Eddy x recommendation Johnson x Kohinke x Minnix x Nickens x cc: File John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant Administrator THERAPEUTICS BUDGET INFORMATION THERBUD1 FUNDING SOURCE TOTAL DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHIATRIC HEAD HEARING GENERAL VISUAL ---------------------- FUNDS --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DISABILITIES DISABILITIES INJURY IMPAIRMENTS PUBLIC IMPAIRMENTS GENERAL FUND 100,487 41,824 11,932 13,104 1,547 10,832 21,248 MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES GRANT 21,675 21,675 MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES GRANT 12,000 12,000 FEES (EST) 13,950 8,000 800 200 2,500 2,450 ROANOKE CITY CASH (EST) 3,040 760 760 760 760 ROANOKE CITY IN-KIND 1,300 800 500 TOTAL ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 152,452 73,059 25,992 14,064 1,547 13,332 24,458 REGISTRATION BY RESIDENCY TOTAL DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHIATRIC HEAD HEARING GENERAL VISUAL JANUARY - DECEMBER 1991 ---------- DISABILITIES ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DISABILITIES INJURY IMPAIRMENTS PUBLIC IMPAIRMENTS ROANOKE CITY 825 247 117 44 58 0 359 ROANOKE COUNTY 675 318 33 71 154 0 99 SALEM 251 44 7 40 41 0 119 BOTETOURT COUNTY 22 2 0 0 15 0 5 OTHER/UNKNOWN 330 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 0 0 225 100 0 TOTAL 2,103 616 157 155 493 100 582 % OF REGISTRATION BY RESIDENCY TOTAL DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHIATRIC HEAD HEARING GENERAL VISUAL JANUARY - DECEMBER 1991 ----- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DISABILITIES DISABILITIES INJURY IMPAIRMENTS PUBLIC IMPAIRMENTS ROANOKE CITY 39% 40% 75% 28% 12% 0% 62% ROANOKE COUNTY 32% 52% 21% 46% 31% 0% 17% SALEM 12% 7% 4% 26% 8% 0% 20% BOTETOURT COUNTY 1% 0% 0% 0% 3% 0% 1% OTHER/UNKNOWN 16% ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1% 0% 0% 46% 100% 0% TOTAL 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% RELATIVE SHARE OF TOTAL COST TOTAL DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHIATRIC HEAD HEARING GENERAL VISUAL JANUARY - DECEMBER 1991 -------- DISABILITIES -------------------------------------------------------------------- DISABILITIES INJURY IMPAIRMENTS PUBLIC IMPAIRMENTS ROANOKE CITY 67,926 29,295 19,370 3,992 182 0 15,087 ROANOKE COUNTY 54,265 37,716 5,463 6,442 483 0 4,160 SALEM 15,136 5,219 1,159 3,629 129 0 5,001 BOTETOURT COUNTY 494 237 0 0 47 0 210 OTHER/UNKNOWN ------------------------------------------------------------- 14,631 593 0 0 706 13,332 0 TOTAL 152,452 73- 059 25,992 14,064 1,547 -------------- 13,332 24,458 RELATIVE SHARE OF LOCAL COST TOTAL DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHIATRIC HEAD HEARING GENERAL VISUAL JANUARY - DECEMBER 1991 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DISABILITIES DISABILITIES INJURY IMPAIRMENTS PUBLIC IMPAIRMENTS ROANOKE CITY 42.5% 42,671 16,770 8,892 3,720 ------------------------- 182 0 13,107 ROANOKE COUNTY SALEM 34.0% 34,199 21,591 2,508 6,002 483 0 3,614 11.3% 11,374 2,987 532 3,382 129 0 4,345 BOTETOURT COUNTY 0.4% 365 136 0 0 47 0 183 OTHER/UNKNOWN ----------------------------------------------- 11.8% 11,878 339 0 0 706 10,832 0 TOTAL 100.0% 100,487 41,824 11,932 13,104 1,547 10,832 21,248 O� JOAN a L x. z � o 18 88 sFso�i��rµ�P� Btaurnul BtQmm�v COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ELMER C. HODGE TO: FROM DATE: SUBJECT: /� 7-T1q C it 1"'e "t'/ LAIIIT�1� IIf �IIa1TIIhP 1992 BOARD OF SUPE3 ISORS Lee a Edd.. Chalrasn Windsor HAh Edward G. %ohLnjw.r VS k,..ChairmaD Calawbo MigOn-W Dko-k-t Bob L Johnson H.W. M Dkbict H Odell "Fear, Mi,, t Care sprbv MaWs� D}atrici Han? G Nkiem Vinton Mmomerw D}A y MEMORANDUM Members, Board of Supervisors Harr C . `- � Nickens January 21, 1992 THERAPEUTICS PROGRAM bcaw AU4AV=cn '1II1' 1979 1989 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS N A. MCGRAW. 0-WRmAN UTAWRA "AGUTL1WL OtrrP"= HARRY C. & V)CE-0WRWW MAGIrrI74AL caTra=T WINOW)R HOAS LEE B. EDGY oemet-r 808 HOLLns R�WtD W. R UVC SPRt►q 4AGUTERI L DMTYa?-1x Mr. Minnix asked �f the count y had ever for assistance from the City regarding therapeutics. please seedthe attached letter (April, 1990) to Mayor Taylor. e I am asking that this matter be considered for our January 28, 1992 agenda. As we begin work on the 1993 budgets, timing is now. Attachment HCN/bjh cc: Elmer Hodge AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1992 RESOLUTION 22592-10 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM J - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. that the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for February 25, 1992, designated as Item J - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 4, inclusive, as follows: 1. Approval of Minutes - January 14, 1992; January 18, 1992; January 28, 1992. 2. Confirmation of Committee Appointment to the Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission. 3. Acceptance of Donations of Right -of -Way and Easements for Bushdale Road Rural Addition Project. 4. Resolution of Appreciation to Marian Chappelle for Service on the Planning Commission. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Clifford Craig, Director, Utility ACTION NO. A -22592-10.a ITEM NUMBER -,_ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 25, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission COUNTY ADMINISTRATORIS COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: At the February 11, 1992 meeting, the Board of Supervisors made the following nomination: Parks _& Recreation Advisory Commission Supervisor Johnson nominated Rita Watson to the three-year unexpired term of Karen Padgett. This term will expire on June 30, 1992. Ms. Padgett resigned effective January 30, 1992 because she is no longer living in Roanoke County. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the above nomination be confirmed by the Board of Supervisors. Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board c-� Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator -------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Edward G. Kohinke No Yes Abs Denied ( ) Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred ( ) Kohinke x To ( ) Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission File ACTION NO. A -22592-10.b ITEM NO. 7-..3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: February 25, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: ACCEPTANCE OF DONATIONS OF RIGHT-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS FOR THE BUSHDALE ROAD RURAL ADDITION PROJECT COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: L SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: This consent agenda item involves the donation of the following rights-of-way and easements to the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, in connection with the Bushdale Road Rural Addition Project in the Vinton Magisterial District: a) Donation of all right, title and interest in and to the existing "Private Road", known as Bushdale Road, varying in width from twelve feet (121) to thirty-one (311), leading to and from Virginia Secondary Route 659 (Mayfield Drive, formerly Gearhart Road) from Forrest Wayne Poff, Sr., and Pamela G. Poff, his wife, (Deed Book 1058, page 715). b) Donation of: (i) a parcel of land shown and designated as "PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY (.038 Ac.)" on a plat, dated December 29, 1990, prepared by the Roanoke County Engineering Department, a copy of which is attached hereto; (ii) all right, title and interest in and to the existing "Private Road", known as Bushdale Road, varying in width from twelve feet (121) to thirty-one (311), leading to and from Virginia Secondary Route 659 (Mayfield Drive, formerly Gearhart Road); and (iii) a drainage easement, fifteen feet (151) in width, as shown on said plat; from George Russell Lawrence and Deborah Sue Smith Lawrence, husband and wife, (Deed Book 1313, page 247). C) Donation of: (i) a parcel of land shown and designated as "PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY (.185 Ac.)" on a plat, dated December 29, 1990, prepared by the Roanoke County Engineering Department, a copy of which is attached hereto; and (ii) all right, title and interest in and to 7_3 the existing "Private Road", known as Bushdale Road, varying in width from twelve feet (121) to thirty-one (311), leading to and from Virginia Secondary Route 659 (Mayfield Drive, formerly Gearhart Road); from Samuel A. Smith and Mary Frances Smith, husband and wife, (Deed Book 406, page 137). d) Donation of all right, title and interest in and to the existing "Private Road", known as Bushdale Road, varying in width from twelve feet (121) to thirty-one (311), leading to and from Virginia Secondary Route 659 (Mayfield Drive, formerly Gearhart Road) from Peggy F. Poff, widow, (Deed Book 819, page 369). e) Donation of: (i) a parcel of land shown and designated as "PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY (.101 Ac.)" on a plat, dated December 27, 1990, prepared by the Roanoke County Engineering Department, a copy of which is attached hereto; (ii) all right, title and interest in and to the existing "Private Road", known as Bushdale Road, varying in width from twelve feet (121) to thirty-one (311), leading to and from Virginia Secondary Route 659 (Mayfield Drive, formerly Gearhart Road); and (iii) a drainage easement, varying in width from 10' to 51, and a storm water management easement, of variable width and rectangular in shape, as shown on said plat; from Bonnie Eppley Dean Bremner (formerly Bonnie Eppley Dean) and Charles Bremner, her husband, (Deed Book 1232, page 1235). f) Donation of all right, title and interest in and to the existing "Private Road", known as Bushdale Road, varying in width from twelve feet (121) to thirty-one (311), leading to and from Virginia Secondary Route 659 (Mayfield Drive, formerly Gearhart Road) from Charles H. Poff and Peggy J. Poff, husband and wife, (Deed Book 902, page 790; Deed Book 1254, page 1913). g) Donation of: (i) a parcel of land shown and designated as "PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY (.023 Ac.)" on a plat, dated December 27, 1990, prepared by the Roanoke County Engineering Department, a copy of which is attached hereto; and (ii) all right, title and interest in and to the existing "Private Road", known as Bushdale Road, varying in width from twelve feet (121) to thirty-one (311), leading to and from Virginia Secondary Route 659 (Mayfield Drive, formerly Gearhart Road); from Maynard R. Owen and Dorothy P. Owen, husband and wife, (Deed Book 1303, page 1668). h) Donation of: (i) a parcel of land shown and designated as "PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY (.063 Ac.)11 on a plat, dated December 28, 1990, prepared by the Roanoke County Engineering Department, a copy of which is attached J hereto; (ii) all right, title and interest in and to the existing "Private Road", known as Bushdale Road, varying in width from twelve feet (121) to thirty-one (311), leading to and from Virginia Secondary Route 659 (Mayfield Drive, formerly Gearhart Road); and (iii) a drainage easement, five feet (51) in width, as shown on said plat; from Rachel H. Arthur, widow (Deed Book 321, page 86). i ) Donation of: ( i) a parcel of land shown and designated as "PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY (.052 Ac.)" on a plat, dated January 2, 1991, prepared by the Roanoke County Engineering Department, a copy of which is attached hereto; and (ii) all right, title and interest in and to the existing "Private Road", known as Bushdale Road, varying in width from twelve feet (121) to thirty-one (311), leading to and from Virginia Secondary Route 659 (Mayfield Drive, formerly Gearhart Road); from Ronald D. Wood and Jennie P. Wood, husband and wife, (Deed Book 1172, page 832). j) Donation of: (i) a parcel of land shown and designated as "PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY (.056 Ac.)" on a plat, dated January 2, 1991, prepared by the Roanoke County Engineering Department, a copy of which is attached hereto; and (ii) all right, title and interest in and to the existing "Private Road", known as Bushdale Road, varying in width from twelve feet (121) to thirty-one (311), leading to and from Virginia Secondary Route 659 (Mayfield Drive, formerly Gearhart Road); from Harold D. Kelly and Paulette W. Kelly, husband and wife, (Deed Book 1236, page 1076). County staff has inspected and approved the location and dimensions of the right-of-way and easements for the project. FISCAL IMPACT• No county funding is required for these acquisitions. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of the donations of right-of-way and easements for the Bushdale Road Rural Addition Project. Respectfully submitted, - % At kV& A&A At Vickie L. Hu ark Assistant County Attorney Action Vote Approved y No Yes Abs (x) Motion b Edward C. Kohinke Eddy x Denied ( ) Johnson x Received ( ) Kohinke x Referred Nickens x to Minnix x c:\wpsl\ager,ae\reak!.c\nu.eaale.rn cc: File Clifford Craig, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION SHO VW ON THIS PIAT REPRESENT A COMPOSITE OF DEEDS PLATS, AND CALCULATED WORMAMN AND DO NOT REFLECT AN ACCURATE BOUNDARY SURVEY. J-3 TAX NO.79.03-5-90 C OF PROP. BUSHDALE ROAD I. TAX NO. 79.03-5-89 232/4 X12' Y/ M N� a co �2 t m 0 PROPOSED Z RIGHT OF wAY J (. 056 Ac) o 4 Remoining 8 Property oft -3 HAROLD D.8 PAULETTE W. KELLY (2.944 Ac) S' o w o , cn 3 to M Z O 16 x 244.03 --- S 2-1040* E TAX NO.79.03-4-28 TAXMP JPO.79.03 -4-29 TAX NO. 79.03-4-27 1 ' ' SCALE: I"= sot PLAT SHOWING PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY BEING CONVEYED TO ROANOKE COUNTY BY HAROLD D. & PAULETTE W. KELLY PREPARED BY: ROANOKE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: 1-2-9t METES AND BOUNDS DESOWTM SHOWN ON THIS PLAT REPRESENT A COMPOSITE OF DEEDS% PLATO AND CALCULAT ED WW T ION AJrD DO NOT REFLECT AN ACCURATE BOUNDARY SURVEY. f PROP BUSHDAL E f to a U3 a _ z N O in LL m O TAX N0.79.03-4-30 co a Z N 0 C6 0 p J J W O 0 a Z +1 TAX N0. 79.03-4-30.1 •0 , PROPOSED_ . R/GHT OF WAY (.052 Ac) Property of.. RONALD D. 8 ✓ENN/E P. WOOD (3 258 Ac) . N 6 a N TAX N0. 79.03-4-32 r m 3 g . 0 L Ct TAX AW NQ. 79.03-4-31 SCALE: I"= 50' PLAT SHOWING PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY BEING CONVEYED TO ROANOKE COIINTY BY RONALD D. & JENNIE P. WOOD PREPARED BY, ROANOKE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: 1- 2 - 91 METES MID BOUNDS DES"TION SHOWN ON THIS PLAT REPRESENTA COMPOSITE OF DEED.% PLATS MID CALCULATED NOWMATION AND 00 NOT REFLECT AN ACCURATE BOUNDARY SURVEY. TAX N0. 79.03-4-29 S-3 OF --O- BUSHDA L E ROAD LAI WROMA wtn N PROPOSED 5'D. E. cd oa o 3 v N c o ti M N TAX NO. 79.03-4-25 TAX AW NO. 79.03-4-30 mwi PROPOSED RIGHT Remaining OF WAY (063 Ac) Property.- of: RACHEL H. ARTHUR (2.037Ac) E TAX NO. 79.03-4-30.1 SCALE: I 50l 0 7-o PLAT SHOWING PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT BEING CONVEYED TO ROANOKE COUNTY BY RACHEL H. ARTHUR I PREPARED BY: ROANOKE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: 12 -28-90 METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION SHOWN ON THIS PLAT REPRESENT A COMPOSITE OF DEEDS, PLATS, AND CALCULATED INFORMATION AND DO NOT REFLECT AN ACCURATE BOUNDARY SURVEY. TAX NO. 79.03-5-85 4� Itoo moningrce/ IYNARD R. 8ROTHY P. OWEN 4 Ac) PROPOSED — RIGHT CF WAY (.023 Ac) 20'j / 4 33 E OF PROP. 9USHDALE ROAD TAX MAP NO. 79.03-5-82&83 2' � ►O'er TAX N0.79.03 -5- 81 Ng o06 � .4u N oN m Z TAX NO. 79.03-5-81 Remaining POrC81 Jr (.037Ac) SCALE: 1"= 30' PLAT SHOWING PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY BEING CONVEYED TO ROANOKE COUNTY BY MAYNARD R. & DOROTHY P. OWEN PREPARED BY: ROANOKE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: 12-27-90 METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION SHOWN ON THIS PLAT REPRESENT A COMPOSITE OF DEEDS„ PLATS, AND CALCULATED MIMIA MN AND DO NOT REFLECT AN ACCURATE BOUNDARY SURVEY. BUSHDALE RD. �— 'I _ 120.5 S 03 0 2 ° �E 100' NATURAL , DRA/NAGEWAY ' w Property of o CHARLES 9 PEGGY TAX N0.79.03-5-89 N POFF CD N ,t' _ 0 U) 3 -� 00 (D (V co N 0 (n u') N TAX N0.79.03-3-88 OJ N 1 1 1 20'DRA/NAGE EASEMENT rD. E. 1004 N12°42 W - N07041'40"W TAX N0.79.03-5"68 TAXMAPNa 79.03-5-89 S168.2 13:3 C? N I N M In to ilm TAX NO 79.03-3-90 SCALE: I"=50' PLAT SHOWING PROPOSED DRAINAGE EASEMENT BEING CONVEYED TO ROANOKE COUNTY BY CHARLES & PEGGY POFF PREPARED BY. ROANOKE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: 12-27-90 METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION SHOWN ON THIS PLAT REPRESENT A COMPOSITE OF DEEDS, PLATS, AND CALCULATED INFORMATION AND DO NOT REFLECT AN ACCURATE BOUNDARY SURVEY, EDGE OF S8I'54'E ROAD IFOF PROP SUSHDALE RD. 17.4' S 4°33'E -- COMMON k (D.B.1232,PG.1236 — — / � "'106 6 '106.6 - — TAX NO. 79.03-5-83 ti S 4.3 ' V11 /57.4 12'PRIVATE RD. 20' PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY (. l0/ Ac) 5 ' DRAINAGE" EA SEMENT (D. E. Remoining Property of. CHARLES B BONNIE E. DEAN BREMNER (1.959 Ac) STORM WATER MANAGEMENT EASEMENT (S. 120 --- --- 'F-0u), 10 5' N 12° 33� TAX NO.79.03-5-81 171.08' r N 12° 33' `N 5-70 TAX N0.79.03- TAX MAP NO. 79.03-5-85 TAX NO. 79.03-5-87.1 NATURAL WATERCOURSE w SCALE: I"= 60' PLAT SHOWING PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY, DRAINAGE EASEMENT, & STORMWATER MANAGEMENT EASEMENT BEING CONVEYED TO ROANOKE COUNTY BY CHARLES & BONNIE E. DEAN BREMNER PREPARED BY: ROANOKE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: 12-27-90 METES AND BOUNDS DESCRFT)ON SHOWN ON TWS PUT REPRESENT A WUPOSITE OF DEEDS PUTS, AND CALCULATED IYFORMAWN AND 00 NOT REFLECT AN ACCURATE BOUNDARY SURVEY. TAX NO. 79.03 -4-32 TAX NO 79 ItT M Q� to a? 0 0 ul) N co N C PROP. BUSHDALE ROAD TAX NO. 79.03-4-31 r� �OM�MON 2oI PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY(I85Ac) Remoining Property of: SAMUEL A. 8 MARY FRANCES SMITH (I.065Ac) .03-5-87.1 249.98 �-- N 00°30 22 W TAX U"NO..03-5-81 PLAT SHOWING PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY BEING CONVEYED TO ROANOKE COUNTY BY SAMUEL A. & MARY F. SMITH �,3 12' PRIVATE ROAD S03°02'00'' E \�-- 9.60 / 31.34' N C7 CL Ki M C6 a SCALE: 1"= 50 TAX NO. 79.03-5-88 z 0 0 Y; PREPARED BY: ROANOKE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: 12-29-90 14:ETES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION SHOWN ON THIS PLAT REPRESENTA COMPOSITE OF DEEDS, PLATS, AND CALCULATED INFORMATION AND DO NOT REFLECT AN ACCURATE BOUNDARY SURVEY. G 24T �- OF PROP. BUSHDAL E RD. '0) rio m0 N CD z1 PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY (. 038 Ail TAX N0.79.03-5-87 Remoining Property of: GEORGE RUSSELL B DEBORAH SUE SM1TH LAWRENCE (2.462,4c) 249.98 S000,50 15' a?AINA GE EASEMENT 12 NATURAL • I 'WATERCIXIRSE 1 TAX NO. 79.03-5-" TAX NO. 79.03-5-$8.1 I*-.- ` N TAX NO.79-05-5-$9 NO.7943-5 70 TAX MAP ND. 79.03-5-87.1 ME �i SCALE: i" = so' PLAT SHOWING PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT BEING CONVEYED TO ROANOKE COUNTY BY GEORGE R. & DEBORAH S. SMITH LAWRENCE PREPARED BY: ROANOKE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE. 12 -29-90 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1992 RESOLUTION 22592-10.0 OF APPRECIATION TO MARIAN CHAPPELLE FOR HER SERVICE ON THE PLANNING COMMISSION WHEREAS, Marian Chappelle has been a member of the Roanoke County Planning Commission since November, 1990, and has spent countless hours preparing for and attending the meetings of the Commission, carrying out her duties in an exemplary manner; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Chappelle has shown her devotion to the well-being of the Roanoke Valley as a whole, and has volunteered for a variety of activities, including Youth Haven II, the American Heart Association, the American Cancer Society, and the High Street Baptist Church Choir; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Chappelle has also shown her dedication to the youth of Roanoke County through her work as a special education teacher at Northside Junior High School; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Chappelle has announced that she will be unable to continue to serve on the Roanoke County Planning Commission, due to the variety of demands on her time and energy. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, does hereby express its sincere appreciation to MARIAN CHAPPELLE for her service on the Planning Commission and for her continued dedication to the welfare of the people of Roanoke County. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Resolutions of Appreciation File Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1992 RESOLUTION 22591-11 CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: rn a -A -W-- , . Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Executive Session AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1992 ORDINANCE 22592-12 AUTHORIZING A USE -NOT - PROVIDED -FOR PERMIT TO OPERATE A COMMERCIAL CAT KENNEL TO BE LOCATED IMMEDIATELY NORTH OF 7226 BRANICO DRIVE IN THE CAVE SPRING MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT UPON THE APPLICATION OF JANE AND JOHN HOLMGREN WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on January 28, 1992, and the second reading and public hearing was held February 25, 1992; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on February 4, 1992; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That a use -not -provided -for permit to operate a commercial cat kennel on a certain tract of real estate located immediately north of 7226 Branico Drive, as described herein, and located on Branico Drive (Va. Sec. Rte. 763), (Tax Map Number 105.00-2-1.1) in the Cave Spring Magisterial District, is hereby authorized. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Jane and John Holmgren. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: BEGINNING at a point along the center line of Branico Drive (Va. Sec. Rte. 763) 387.31 feet south of the intersection of Branico Drive and Cotton Hill Road (Va. Sec. Rte. 688) to a Branch; THENCE following the centerline of Branch S 11 deg. 45' 40" W. 134.44' to a point; THENCE S. 37 deg. 031 30" W. 83.38' to a point; THENCE S. 87 deg. 29' 38" W. 51.08 feet to a point; THENCE S. 52 deg. 51' 10" W. 45.56' to a point; THENCE S. 16 deg. 49' 05" E. 57.62' to a point; THENCE S. 17 deg. 10' 37" W. 43.45' to a point; THENCE leaving the Branch centerline S. 72 deg. 49' 23" W. to an iron pin set; THENCE S. 70 deg. 33' W. 182.95' to a point in the centerline of Branico Drive; THENCE along centerline of Branico Drive N. 17 deg. 10' E. to a point; THENCE N. 25 deg. 14' 20" E. 99.54' to a point; THENCE N. 63 deg. 11' 14" E. 78.22 feet to a point; THENCE N. 76 deg. 22' 19" E. 76.28' to a point; THENCE N. 82 deg. 06' 36" E. 65.21' to a point; THENCE N. 69 deg. 07' 15" E. 112.24' to the Beginning point on Branico Drive. Being 1.461 acres, more or less, as shown on a survey of property by T. P. Parker & Son for Oman Lee and Cynthia J. East dated May 14, 1986. 4. That the applicants have voluntarily proffered in writing the following conditions which the Board of Supervisors hereby accepts: a. The kennel will only provide boarding for domestic cats. b. The building will be a single -story concrete block structure with dimensions of 241 x 421. It will provide space to board up to 60 cats. C. The entrance from Brancio Drive will be shared with that of Sleepy Hollow Kennel. The driveway and parking area is 5,000 square feet with a loop driveway which will exit onto Branico Drive, 160 feet north of the entrance. building. d. The sign for the business will be located on the e. The business will be on the same property as a home on which construction will begin within thirty-six (36) months of the business becoming operational. 5. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: A/• Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul Mahoney, County Attorney AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1992 ORDINANCE 22592-13 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A 2.061 -ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT THE CORNER OF ROUTE 24 AND FEATHER ROAD (PART OF TAX MAP NO. 61.18-2-25) IN THE VINTON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-1 AND R-1 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF B-2 UPON THE APPLICATION OF STEVE BROWN WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on January 28, 1992, and the second reading and public hearing was held February 25, 1992; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on February 4, 1992; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing 2.061 acre, as described herein, and located at the corner of Route 24 and Feather Road, (Part of Tax Map Number 61.18-2-25) in the Vinton Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of B-1 and R-1, Office District and Single Family Residential District, to the zoning classification of B-2, General Commercial District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of STEVE BROWN. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Parcel A BEGINNING at the intersection of the southerly right- of -way line of Washington Avenue (State Route 24) and the westerly right-of-way line of Feather Road (State Route 654); THENCE with the westerly right-of-way line of Feather Road (variable width right-of-way) S. 45 deg. 46 min. 55 sec. E. for a distance of 262.49 feet to the point of intersection of said right-of-way line and a zoning line marking the boundary between B-1 zoning and R-1 zoning, said zoning line being 200 feet south of and running parallel to Washington Avenue; THENCE with the zoning line S. 84 deg. 35 min. 03 sec. W. for a distance of 454.27 feet to a point on the line of the property of the Town of Vinton; and THENCE with the property of the Town of Vinton N. 01 deg. 00 min. 46 sec. W. for a distance of 200.59 feet to the southerly right-of-way line of Washington Avenue (variable width right-of-way); THENCE with the southerly right-of-way line of Washington Avenue N. 84 deg. 35 min. 03 sec. E. for a distance of 268.86 feet to the Point of Beginning and containing 1.660 acres, more or less. Parcel B BEGINNING at a point on the westerly right-of-way line of Feather Road (State Route 654 - variable width right-of- way), said point being S. 45 deg. 46 min. 55 sec. E. 262.49 feet from the intersection of Feather Road and Washington Avenue (State Route 24); THENCE leaving Feather Road S. 39 deg. 44 min. 33 sec. W. for a distance of 20.76 feet to a point in the center of a small branch; THENCE with the center of the branch the following three (3) courses: (1) S. 44 deg. 55 min. 35 sec. W. for a distance of 45.83 feet; (2) S. 73 deg. 28 min. 23 sec. W. for a distance of 21.02 feet; (3) N. 82 deg. 12 min. 47 sec. W. for a distance of 35.39 feet; THENCE with a zoning line marking the boundary between R-1 and RE zoning and running parallel to Washington Avenue S. 84 deg. 35 min. 03 sec. W. for a distance of 352.61 feet to a point on the line of the property of the Town of Vinton; THENCE with the property of the Town of Vinton N. 01 deg. 00 min. 46 sec. W. for a distance of 39.66 feet to a point on the line of Parcel A; THENCE with the line of Parcel A and parallel to Washington Avenue N. 84 deg. 35 min. 03 sec. E. for a distance of 454.27 feet to the Point of Beginning and containing 0.401 acres, more or less. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy NAYS: None A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul Mahoney, County Attorney