The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About7/28/1992 - Adopted Board RecordsAT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 28, 1992 RESOLUTION 72892-1 OF APPRECIATION TO ROANOKE MOOSE LODGE NO. 284 FOR DONATION OF A RESCUE BOAT TO CATAWBA-MASON COVE RESCUE SQUAD WHEREAS, fire and rescue protection is an important service provided to County residents; and WHEREAS, the volunteer Fire and Rescue Squads of Roanoke County have a long history of outstanding service to the citizens of the County; and WHEREAS, the support of the community is an important component of that service; and WHEREAS, Roanoke Lodge No. 284, Loyal Order of Moose, has donated to the Catawba -Mason Cove Rescue Squad a swift water rescue boat and related equipment, which will be used in the event of flooding, or for rescue in the lakes, rivers and streams of the County; and WHEREAS, through this gift to the Catawba -Mason Cove Rescue Squad, the Roanoke Moose Lodge has demonstrated its generosity and community service orientation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, on its own behalf and on behalf of the citizens of the Mason Cove/Bradshaw area of the County, expresses deepest appreciation and thanks to the ROANOKE MOOSE LODGE NO. 284 and its membership for the support and benevolence which it has shown to Roanoke County. On motion of Supervisor Eddy to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Eddy None Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Resolutions of Appreciation File T. C. Fuqua, Chief, Fire & Rescue ACTION # A-72892-2 ITEM NUMBER D — i AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 28, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Authorization to Conduct Sanitary Sewer Evaluation/Rehabilitation Program on Privately Owned Sewer Facilities COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR' S COMMENTS: I prefer to proceed with the testing, and after the first ninety days of the testing, we will review our findings with the Board We can then decide whether or not to take enforcement action. We will also review our ordinances to see if it is feasible to retrict construction of basement facilities in areas where flooding may occur. BACKGROUND: The Board of Supervisors approved the Sanitary Sewer Evaluation/Rehabilitation (SSE/R) Program in 1986 to reduce the amount of infiltration and inflow into the Sanitary Sewer System. The SSE/R Program will extend the useful capacity of the public sewer facilities as well as reduce backup into customers homes. The SSE/R Program is divided into publicly owned facilities and privately owned facilities connected to the public sewer system. Staff has completed the public portion on two sewersheds and is currently working on the third sewershed. After the recent flooding in April of this year, residents of the Penn Forest area experienced difficulty with back up from the sanitary sewer system into their homes. Staff believes that the cause of this back up is improper discharge of stormwater into the sanitary sewer system, which would be addressed by a private SSE/R program. A work session was held with the Board of Supervisors on July 14, 1992 concerning the need to conduct the SSE/R Program on privately owned facilities connected to the public system, and the session was attended by citizens from the Penn Forest area. The Board of Supervisors requested staff to prepare a Board Report detailing the proposed procedure for conducting the program. DISCUSSION The following procedure is proposed to conduct the SSE/R Program of privately owned facilities connected to the public sewer: 1 (1) The privately owned facilities will be inspected only after completion of the public portion of the SSE/R Program in the sewershed to which the private facilities are connected. The only exception to this would be if a property owner requests that his or her sewer facility be inspected earlier. The program would begin in Penn Forest, as this area has the highest priority for the public SSE/R program. (2) The inspection will begin at the highest elevation in the sewershed or sub -area and proceed toward the lower portion. (3) Property owners will receive written notification prior to scheduling the inspection. This notification will include a form for property owners to sign giving the County permission to inspect their property. For those property owners that refuse to give permission to have their property inspected, an administrative search warrant under authority already provided by Article 18 of the Roanoke County Code. (4) Inspections of the interior portion of any building will only be conducted in the presence of the homeowner or their designee. (5) All inspections will be performed by County employees who will carry proper identification. The following work/inspection will be performed: (1) The sewer lateral will be excavated at the point where it crosses the property line or edge of sewer easement. The sewer lateral will be inspected by: (a) Internal TV inspection to the point it connects to the sewer main. Any discrepancies noted will be scheduled for repair. (b) Internal TV inspection as far as possible toward the building. A pressurized smoke test may be performed on this section. Any discrepancies will be noted for correction. (2) Any downspout connection, areaway drain, patio drain, or other external drains will be dye tested to determine if they are connected to the sewer system. Any connections found will be noted for correction. (3) Foundation drains will be tested by dye injection to determine if they are connected to the sewer lateral. Any connections found will be noted for correction. (4) A cleanout will be installed on the sewer lateral with a cap at grade. The lateral excavation will be backfilled and restored. 2 Note: For properties that have a cleanout at the property line, the above testing would be observed by inserting the TV camera into the cleanout or main sewer. (5) An internal inspection of the building sewer facilities will be conducted in the presence of the owner or designee and will include the following: (A) Test for pick -hole in floor drains that will permit groundwater to enter the sewer system. (B) Check for indication of leaking basement walls or floor that could enter the floor drains. (C) Check for sump pumps connected to or piped for connection to the sewer system. (D) Check for a foundation drain connected to the sewer system. Any discrepancies will be noted and explained to the property owner. (6) A general inspection will be made of the area outside the building to determine adequate grading, downspout diversion and sump pump outlet or other factors that may cause surface or groundwater to enter the building and eventually enter the public sewer through floor drains. Upon completion of the inspection, a complete report of the findings will be written by the inspector. This report will be reviewed by the Utility engineering personnel. A final report will then be prepared for the property owner detailing the results of the inspection along with some suggestions for correction of problems noted. This report will be sent to the property owner along with an offer to discuss the discrepancies on-site with the owner. After the property owner has corrected any improper connection or conditions, sufficient re -inspections will be made to insure corrections are completed. The Roanoke County Code already prohibits discharge of stormwater into the sanitary sewer system, and provides penalties for violation of that section. Violation of that part of the Code is a Class 1 misdemeanor, and penalties under that can include fines of up to $1,000 per day, and/or confinement in jail for not more than 12 months. Additionally, the County may also terminate the sewer and water connection. 3 I - I ALTERNATIVE AND IMPACTS: Alternative No. 1 The Board of Supervisors would authorize staff to conduct the SSE/R Program on privately owned sewer facilities using the procedure outlined above. The property owner would be given six months to correct illegal facilities before enforcement action is taken under provisions of Chapter 18 of the Roanoke County Code. Enforcement would involve pursuing the matter in Court, where the judge could impose the penalties outlined above. This alternative may result in the fastest correction of illegal facilities and result in the highest degree of protection to other users of the public sewer system, since it involves the threat of legal action and conviction of a crime. However, judges may be reluctant to find homeowners guilty of a Class I misdemeanor, particularly if they did not make or authorize the illegal connection. Alternative No. 2 The Board of Supervisors would authorize staff to conduct the SSE/R Program on privately owned sewer facilities using the procedures outlined above. The property owner would be given six months to correct illegal facilities. If corrections were not made at the end of six months, the County would terminate the sewer and water connection to the property until such time corrections have been made. Appeals from the termination can be made to the Board of Supervisors, and can be decided on a case-by-case basis. Customers will be notified prior to the action being taken, so that they will have the opportunity to appeal before service is terminated. The authority for this action is provided by Section 18-172 of the County Code. This alternative would result in correction of illegal facilities and protection of other users without the use of fines or court action on the part of the County. If the Board chooses this option, and enforcement problems develop, Alternative 1 could then be implemented, if necessary. Alternative No. 3 The Board of Supervisors would authorize staff to conduct the SSE/R Program on privately owned sewer facilities using the procedures outlined above. Correction of illegal facilities would be on a voluntary basis with no enforcement action taken on the part of the County. This alternative would result in information being provided to the property owners and would rely on their own conscience to make the required corrections. This alternative would also provide the County with information by which to quantify the magnitude of the 4 corrections required. However, it may also result in legal action from property owners who are being affected by the discharge, as the County would be knowingly not enforcing its own Code. Alternative No. 4 The Board of Supervisors would not authorize staff to conduct the SSE/R Program on privately owned sewer facilities. This alternative would result in continued infiltration and inflow into the public sewer system from private facilities. This alternative will also result in continued sewer backup into homes even after the SSE/R Program has been completed. FISCAL IMPACT• The SSE/R program was approved by the Board in 1986, and staff and equipment is already in place. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: In order to best protect the health, safety and welfare of all County sewer customers, staff recommends the Board of Supervisors approve Alternative No. 1. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED: Cliffor aig, P.E. Elmer C. Hodge Utility Director County Administrator Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred to Substitute ACTION VOTE Motion by: Bob L. Johnson motion No to authorize staff to go Eddy forward with testing and reporLlAhnson _ back in 90 days and that thereKohinke _ be no enforcement or fines Minnix _ levied during that time Nickens cc: File Clifford Craig, Director, Utility Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections 5 Yes Absent x 1 ACTION NO. A-72892-3 ITEM NO. D-7- AT Z AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 28, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Funding for the Roanoke Regional Housing Strategy COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: Zee_ �7�4 BACKGROUND• Since early 1991, Roanoke County has actively participated in the formation and operation of the Roanoke Regional Housing Network. The Network is comprised of representatives from Roanoke County, Salem, Roanoke City, and over 20 other regional agencies and associations. The common thread between all of these organizations is an interest in Roanoke regional housing issues. The Network is currently involved in a number of housing related initiatives. One of which is a proposal to invite the Enterprise Foundation to the Roanoke Valley to undertake a comprehensive assessment of the Valley's affordable housing needs and potential. The Enterprise Foundation is a national non-profit corporation. It's mission is to provide low-income persons decent and affordable housing. They currently are providing services and working on projects in over 60 cities in the United States, including Lynchburg, Virginia. Rather than take a primary funding role, the Foundation identifies local capacity to provide affordable housing. It then facilitates, coordinates and leverages these local resources for affordable private and public housing construction and rehabilitation. The cost of the Foundation's assessment is $10,000 plus travel expenses. The Network has requested that Roanoke County, Roanoke City, and Salem each contribute $2,000 towards the cost. The Roanoke Redevelopment and Housing Authority has also committed to a $2,000 contribution. The United Way has expressed an interest in contributing the remaining funds necessary. To date, Salem, Roanoke City and the Housing Authority have formally authorized their respective $2,000 contributions. N I have attached to this report two brief documents that provide the Board additional information on the scope of the assessment and the products that we would receive. I have also place in your Reading File a copy of the assessment report undertaken for Lynchburg in 1991. Fiscal Impact• The fiscal impact of this request is $2,000. Staff recommends that funds be appropriated from the Board's Contingency Fund. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends as follows: 1. That the Board authorize the requested $2,000 contribution towards the cost of the Enterprise Foundations affordable housing assessment of the Roanoke region. Respectfully Submitted, Terrance L. argton Director of Planning and Zoning Approved, A/" ea — � Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator cc: File Terrance L. Harrrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget CAWPSMAGENDAM PLATER Action Vote No Yes Absent Approved (x) Motion by Bob L. Johnson Eddy x Denied ( ) motion to approve funding Johnson x Received ( ) of $2.000 from Board Kohinke x Referred Contingency Plan Minnix x to Nickens x cc: File Terrance L. Harrrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget CAWPSMAGENDAM PLATER I -i The scope of the Assessment will cover the following: HOUSING NEEDS • Review existing statistics and studies regarding housing problems, housing needs of the low and moderate -income population and special populations, existing programs and plans. • Interview housing officials and key public and private leaders regarding their perception of needs. HOUSING PRODUCTION • Review annual production of housing, and other remedial efforts, including programs and activities of local government, nonprofit organizations, private developers, local housing authority, and banks. • Analyze basic categories of major housing efforts, typical costs and incomes of beneficiaries. HOUSING FINANCE • Review available funding mechanisms and levels of funding. • Analyze actual and potential availability of funding for new initiatives. PUBLIC LEADERSHIP FOR HOUSING INITIATIVES • Interview key housing officials and key public and private leaders regarding their perception of: a) new initiatives that should be undertaken; and b) the amount and source of support that these initiatives are likely to receive. • Determine whether consensus exists on: a) feasible new initiatives; and b) who should the beneficiaries, both in terms of target areas and income groups. ORGANIZATIONAL CAPACITY • Review production trends among the various housing producers. • Interview key producers regarding the capacities and limitations of the local housing industry. HUMAN SERVICE AGENCY LINKAGE TO HOUSING PRESERVATION AND PRODUCTION • Review community social service providers and their relationship to housing. • Interview social service providers regarding perceptions and needs in linking housing and social services. 3E+Nd V V... .i ��rJ a �aJ r.., v• �v� vv ��. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- " ENTERPRISE FOUNDATION COMMUNrl:Y ASSESSMENTS May 7, 1992 What are the purposes,, benefits, and outcome* of an Entorpri44 Foundation assessment of a community's housing needs, reoouroee, and development potentials? Jim Rouse has describes the purpose of an Enterpraie.'assessment ad answering "what are the real needs and the real conditions of the poor, and what resources can be mobilized" to addreee thooe conditions.' --More specifically, Enterprise conducts assessments of every city that requests its assistance for these reasons; to learn as much as possible about the housing riesda Arid conditions of the poor and the potentials for constructing, rehabilitating, and preserving more low-income housing • to ascertain which cities have the commitment and capacity to develop offoctive partnerships • to increase the likelihood that the public, private and nonprofit leaders in tho cities selected for Enterprise assistance are strongly committed to developing and funding a public-private partnership for low-- and moderate;income housing • to increase the likelihood that the capacity exists for partnerships to be effective and become self-sustaining • to give selected cities and their private and nonprofit partners a significant head start toward developing the partnership • to determine if there is a useful role for Enterprise in cities seeking our assistance • to outline a common agenda of issues and recommendationa on which selected cities and The Enterprise Foundation can determine a scope of work for further technical. assistance • to help cities that are not selected for Enterprise assistance better understand the steps they need to take to improve their housing programs What do Enterprise's community assessments contain And addre®e? 'Fames W. Rouse, luncheon speech at the Enterprise Notwork Conference, October 12, 1990. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ • an articulation of Enterprise's mission to make all housing fit and affordable within a generation as a platform to holp low-income people up and out of poverty • a review of the local housing environment, including issues of housing supply, demand, and other market forces and dynamics • an asooroment of local governmental housing resources and programs • an examination of nonprofit and for-profit affordable housing production and capacity as well as existing public/private partnership operations • an identification of resources that are or could be directed at the production and preservation of low-income housing from public and private sector,souroce • an assessment of the potential for new or expanded public/priate partnership activities • suggested strategies to help the community respond to its low- income housing needs and challenges, including spQaif is programs that could be undertaken with and without the assistance of The Enterprise Foundation If an Enterprise assessment: could be boiled down to a han4ful of key questions, what would they be? • What are the hQusig conditions and hogsing needs of the low- and moderate-income population? • What resources are currently being used and what reecurcea might potentially be used to address the housing needs of the low- and moderate--income population? • What is the community's low- and moderate-income de_velonment canacity (for--profit and non-profit)? • What are the potentials for the creation f public-private PartnersPartnersh ips addressing the specific housing needs, resources, and capacities of the.locality? • What are the basic elements of--&--public-private pgrtner_shig development strategy and a low- and moderate-inoomo housing program for the community to pursue? 2 ACTION NO. A-72892-4 ITEM NUMBER 3) — AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 28, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Request for Appropriation of Donation Received from Millard Trussell COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: On July 13, 1992, Mr. Millard Trussell sent a $1,000 donation to the County as a token of his appreciation to the County and its citizens. He did not specify how this contribution should be used and asked that we make that decision. I have sent a letter to Mr. Trussell thanking him for his generosity and for allowing us to determine how to use his donation. I believe this amount could be very helpful in addressing the needs of the County's disabled persons, especially in view of the recent Americans with Disabilities Act. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board accept Mr. Trussell's $1,000 donation and direct Diane Hyatt, Finance Director, to set up an escrow account entitled "Millard Trussell Escrow Account for Disabled Persons". There are many citizens, and employees, too, who are disabled in some way. It has been suggested that we use the funds for playground equipment for children with disabilities. It also has been suggested that we use it to improve access to some of our buildings or parks for the disabled. The Employee Advisory Committee will review the possible uses and make a recommendation to the Board in the near future. At such time as the money is distributed, I would like to invite Mr. Trussell to a board meeting for appropriate recognition. Approved b , Elmer C. Hod46 County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- D-3 ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Edward G. Kohinke No Yes Abs ent Denied ( ) to approve staff r_.o m nda inn Eddy x Received ( ) Johnson x Referred ( ) Kohinke x To ( ) Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Diana Wilson, Chairman, EAC AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 28, 1992 ORDINANCE 72892-5 AMENDING AND READOPTING ORDINANCE 0-71189-6 CONCERNING THE CONVEY- ANCE OF 2.281 ACRES OF REAL ESTATE (SOUTHVIEW) TO THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, BY DELETING THE REVERSIONARY PROVISIONS THEREOF, AN EMER- GENCY MEASURE WHEREAS, on July 11, 1989 the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia adopted Ordinance 0-71189-6, which authorized the acceptance and acquisition of 6 acres of real estate (Southview) from the Roanoke County School Board, and further, authorized the conveyance of 2.281 acres thereof to the Commonwealth of Virginia for the construction of a forensics laboratory, and, WHEREAS, paragraph 5 of said ordinance directed that a reversionary clause be incorporated in any deed of conveyance to the Commonwealth, and, WHEREAS, it now appears that the reversionary clause consti- tutes an impediment to the issuance of bonds by the Virginia Public Building Authority to finance the construction of the proposed forensics laboratory on said property, and, WHEREAS, since the Virginia Public Building Authority proposes to price the bonds on July 28, 1992, and to execute the formal Bond Purchase Contract on July 29, 1992, time for appropriate action is critical, and, WHEREAS, upon the request of bond counsel for the Virginia Public Building Authority and upon the assurances contained in the preliminary official statement, it appears necessary and appropri- 1 ate to authorize the removal of the reversionary clause from the original deed, and, WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on July 28, 1992, and since an emergency exists, that the second reading of this ordinance be dispensed with, in accordance with Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That Ordinance 0-71189-6 is hereby amended and readopted, by the deletion of paragraph 5 of said ordinance, said paragraph reading as follows: That if the Commonwealth of Virginia ceases to utilize said property for a forensics laboratory, then said property shall revert to the County. Further, if the Commonwealth does not commence construction of a foren- sics laboratory facility on this property by June 30, 1993, then said property shall revert to the County. 2. That the conveyance of 2.281 acres of real estate to the Commonwealth of Virginia for the purpose of constructing a forensics laboratory is hereby authorized and approved. 3. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to execute and deliver a deed of correction removing the reversionary clause contained in the original deed, and such other documents and take such actions as may be necessary to accomplish this transac- tion, all of which shall be on form approved by the County Attorney. 4. That an emergency exists requiring the immediate adoption of this ordinance, dispensing with the second reading thereof. 2 i This ordinance shall take effect upon adoption. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the ordinance and waive the second reading, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Eddy NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: Mary H. llen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Paul Mahoney, County Attorney Bayes Wilson, Superintendent, Roanoke County Schools John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment Cliff Craig, Director, Utility Gerald Holt, Sheriff Skip Burkart, Commonwealth's Attorney 3 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 28, 1992 ORDINANCE 72892-6 AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF AN EASEMENT TO APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.01 of the Charter of Roanoke County, the subject property has been declared to be surplus and is being made available for other public uses, i.e. an electric line easement; and 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.04 of the Charter of Roanoke County, a first reading concerning the disposi- tion of the subject property was held on July 14, 1992; a second reading was held on July 28, 1992; and 3. That the electric line easement across property owned by Roanoke County (Stonebridge Park) for Appalachian Power Company upgrades the power lines to the East Vinton Plaza; and 5. That the proceeds from the sale of the easement are to be allocated to the capital reserves of Roanoke County; and 6. That the offer of the Appalachian Power Company of One Dollar ($1.00) for the easement is hereby accepted and all other offers are rejected; and 7. That the County Administrator is authorized to execute such documents and take such actions on behalf of Roanoke County as are necessary to accomplish the conveyance of said easement, all of which shall be upon form approved by the County Attorney. 1 On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Eddy NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: 144 Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File John Chambliss, Assistant Administrator Paul Mahoney, County Attorney John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 28, 1992 RESOLUTION 72892-7 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS ITEM K - CONSENT AGENDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. that the certain section of the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for July 28, 1992, designated as Item K - Consent Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 6, inclusive, as follows: 1. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission and Roanoke Valley Regional Solid Waste Management Board. 2. Approval of Raffle Permit and One -Time Bingo Game from Penn Forest Elementary School P.T.A. 3. Request to Accept Grant from Virginia State Library and Archives for VLIN Online Database Service for County Library. 4. Request for Appropriation of $675 to the School Grant Fund for a Transition Program Support Mini - Grant. 5. Acknowledgement of Acceptance of 0.60 Miles of Edgebrook Road into the Secondary System by the Virginia Department of Transportation. 6. Approval of Resolution Opposing Federal Legislation Concerning the Reporting or Property Taxes to the Federal Government. 2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this resolution. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the Consent Resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Eddy NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: ap�� Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer Spencer Watts, Director, Libraries Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Dr. Bayes Wilson, Superintendent, Roanoke County Schools A -72892-7.a ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 28, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Confirmation of Committee Appointments to Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission and Roanoke Valley Regional Solid Waste Management Board. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Supervisor Kohinke nominated Wayne Gauldin to complete the unexpired three-year term of Fenton E. Harrison, Jr., Catawba Magisterial District. This term will expire June 30, 1994. Roanoke Valley Regional Solid Waste Management Board Supervisor Kohinke nominated Mikeiel T. Wimmer for another four- year term, which will expire July 31, 1998. Ms. Wimmer has been contacted and has agreed to serve. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the above nominees be appointed. Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board Approved (x) Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) cc: File Parks & Roanoke Z45��'_ 4. �_ - Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION Motion by: Bob 7.. Johnson VOTE No Eddy Johnson Kohinke Minnix Nickens Yes Absent X x x X X Recreation Advisory Board File Valley Regional Solid Waste Management Board File ACTION NO. A -72892-7.b ITEM NUMBER 9�1 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 28, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Request for approval of a Raffle Permit and One - Time Bingo Game from the Penn Forest Elementary School P.T.A. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Penn Forest Elementary School has requested a permit to hold a raffle and one-time bingo game in Roanoke County on October 31, 1992. This application has been reviewed with the Commissioner of Revenue and he recommends that it be approved. He advises that one application will cover both permits since the monies collected will be used for the same purpose. The application is on file in the Clerk's Office. The organization has paid the $25.00 fee. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the application for a Raffle Permit and One - Time Bingo Game be approved. SUBMITTED BY: ,f"r) 4L&_" Mary H. lien Clerk to the Board APPROVED BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator -------------------- x ACTION Approved --------- ( ) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson VOTE Denied ( ) No Yes Abs ent Received ( ) Eddy x Referred ( ) Kohinke x To ( ) Johnson x Minnix x cc: File Nickens x Bingo/Raffle File K -Z COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONDUCT RAFFLES OR BINGO Application is hereby made for a bingo game or raffle permit. This application is made subject to all County and State laws, rules, ordinances, and regulations now in force, or that may be enacted hereafter and which are hereby agreed to by the undersigned applicant and which shall be deemed a condition under which this permit is issued. All applicants should exercise extreme care to ensure the accuracy of their responses to the following questions. Bingo raffles are strictly regulated by Title 18.2-340.1 et se ames and criminal statutes of the Virginia Code, and by Section 4 -86 et, he of the Roanoke County Code. These laws authorize the County Board of Supervisors to conduct a reasonable investigation prior to granting a bingo or raffle permit. The Board has sixty days from the filing of an application to grant or deny the permit. The Board may deny, suspend, or revoke the permit of any organization found not to be in strict compliance with county and state law. Any person violating county or state regulations concerning these permits shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. An y who uses any part of the gross receipts from bingo or rafflesrson for any purpose other than the lawful religious, charitable, community, or educational purposes for which the organization is specifically organized, except for reasonable operating expenses, shall be guilty of a Class 6 felony. THIS APPLICATION IF FOR: RAFFLE PERMIT Name of Organization Street Address Mailing Address ' (n City, State, Zip Code (check one) BINGO GAMESC'.WE I ,p �J Purpose and Type of Organization / When was the organization founded? Roanoke County meeting place? Pair x -z Has the organization bn in existence in Roanoke County for two continuous years? YES l NO Is the organization non-profit? YES NO Federal Identif ication Number ay `f Attach copy of IRS Tax Exemption Letter. Officers of the Organization: President: LQUri I \I Vice -President finne err n Address: ((,Address: -� l)[ '. r f �%' -� UA Secretary:�"' IiTreasurer: Address. �� j �� % ) y� - r r /�%� Address. Member authorized to be responsible for Raffle or Bingo operations: Name: Home Address Phone Bus Phone A COMPLETE LIST OF THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF CURRENT MEMBERSHIP MUST BE FURNISHED WITH THIS APPLICATION. Fill Specific location where RaZ1O Bin Ga g me 1sto be conducted.RAFFLES: ��%`�Date of Drawing Time of Drawing BINGO: Days of Week and Hours of Activity: Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday '---4 Saturday From To From To From To From To From To From To From��To P K -Z State specifically how the proceeds from Bingo/Raffle will be used. List in detail the planned or intended use of the proceeds. estimated amounts if necessary. Use l� atl�j b 3 K-2 BINGO: Complete the following: Legal owner(s) of the building where BINGO is to be conducted: Name: .V 'n�, ►�� :, �- `I�1�1�' T"nl� y �cno� i Address: LET 1 � n C.( I I Count VlJ State`� �- ZIP I) Is the building owned by a 501-C non-profit organization? I Seating capacity for each location: 1 b Parking spaces for each location: ALL RAFFLE AND BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 1-19 1• Gross receipts from all sources related to the operation Bingo games or Instant Bingo b calendar quarter for of year period, g y q prior calendar BINGO INSTANT BINGO 1st Quarter 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter 4th Quarter TOTAL TOTAL 2• Does your organization understand that it is a violation law to enter into a contract with an on of organization, partnership,Y Person or firm, association, whatsoever, for the °r corporation of any classification Bingo Games or Raffles? p°Sf °f organizing, managing, or conducting 3• Does your organization understand th at it must maintain and file complete records of receipts and disbursements ertai Bingo games and Raffles, and that such P Hing to by the Commissioner of the Revenue? records are subject to audit 4• Does your organization understand that the Commissioner Revenue or his designee has the right to which any organization is conductinga Bingo r of the perform unannounced audits go upon the premises on g game or raffle, to required to be maintained for and o secure for audi�4= Bingo games or raffles? 4 K-2 5. Does your organization understand that a Financial Report must filed with the first day of Commissioner of the Revenue on or before the first Nc`v tuber of each calendar year for which a permit has been issued? 6. Does yourorganizationderstand exceed fifty thousand dollarsndur ng any a alendart if roquartess r, an additional Financial Report must be filed for suchuarter than sixty days following the last day of such quarter? ` 1 ter 7• Does your organization understand that the failure to financial reports when due shall cause automatic revocation of the permit, and no such organization shall conduct an Bingo the Raffle thereafter unci such report i�sproperly filed and aaenor ew permit is obtained? 8. Does your organization understand that each Financial Report must be accompanied by a Certificate, verified under oath by the Board of Directors, that the proceeds of any Bingo game or raffle have been used for these lawful, religious, charitable, community, or educational Purposes for which the organization is specifically chartered or organized, and that the operations of Bingoames raffles have been in accordance with the provisions,d g or of Chapter 8, Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia? 1`Article 1.1 9• Does your organization understand that a two (2) percent audit fee of the gross receipts must be t upon submission of t Paid to the County of Roanoke first of November? h (Jaual financial report due on or before the 10. Does your orga ization understand that this permit is va only in the County of Roanoke apd only at such locations lid such dates, as are designated in the permit application?lecept r 11. Does your organization understand that no person, bona fide member of any such organization who shall have beemember of such organization for at least ninet da s a participation, shall n a conduct at any bingo participate in the management, operationssuor any remuneration for game or raffle, and no participating Lp=l Person shall receive conduct of any such g operations, or game or raffle? 12. Has your organization attached a check for the annual fee in the amount of $25.00 payable to the County of Roanoke-01Pepnit . E K- Z 13. Does your organization understand that any organization found in violation of the County Bingo and Raffle Ordinance or Section 18.2-340.10 of the Code of Virginia authorizing this permit is subject to having such permit revoked and an agent, member or employee of such organization who violates shareholder theabove to having such permit revoked and an y person, agent, member or employee of such organization who shol tes dthe above referenced Codes may be guilty of a felony? 14. Has your organization attached a com1 � �to membership to this application form?net � � on ist of it ,-��EFd� 15. Has your organization att hEM a copy of its bylaws to this application form? (1 16. Has the organization been declared exempt f m taxation under the Virginia Constitution or statues? property If yes, state whether exemption is for real, pe sonal,p opert both and identi y,exem t property. �j Y, or 17. State he specific type and purpose of the organization. n � r N In 18. Is this organization �ihco�rpo ted i n Vi If yes, name and address of Registered Agentrginia? �_ o �-��`� n��l 9 �r�l �� er)uo l 19• Is the organization registered with the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs pursuant to the Charitable Solicitations Act, Section 57-48 of the Virginia Code? (If so, attach copy of registered agent.) Has the organization been granted an exemption from registrat 'orb the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs? V y (If so, attach copy of exemption.) -_ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ALL RAFFLE APPLICANTS DESCRIBE THE ARTICLES TO BE RAFFLED, VALUE OF SUCH ARTICLES, AND PROCEED TO NOTARIZATION. Artic a De cri do a'- �r�� re Fair Market Value Jhenf-�� 65f S�4-P�•f ^ � fGu I .�Cy' �l • �.!�Y1t!(�;C�c.r�� roe r) •x� U< Ude6rp, h c? kT f" • ~p� �G it ro n f �✓ o 4-2- ALL -Z ALL BINGO APPLICANTS MUST ANSWER QUESTIONS 20 - 27 BEFORE NOTARIZATION RAFFLE APPLICANTS, GO TO NOTARIZATION. 20. Does your organization understand that the bingo games shall not be conducte more frequently than two calendar days in any calendar week? �'�, 21. Does your organization understand that it is required to keep complete records of the bingo game. These records based on §18.2- 340.6 of the Code of Virginia and 54.98 of the Roanoke County Code must include the following: a. A record of the date, quantity, and card value of instant bingo supplies purchased, as well as the name and address of the supplier of such instant bingo supplies, and written invoice or receipt is also reuired for each purchase of instant bingo supplies?4L= b. p, record in writing of the dates on which Bingo is played, the number of people in attendance on each te, and the amount of receipts and prizes on each day? �'c- (These records must be retained for three.y rs. C. A record of the name and address of each individual to whom a door prize, regular or special Bingo ga prize or jackpot from the playing of Bingo is awarded? d• A complete and itemized record of all receipts and disburse- ments which support, and that agree with, the quarterly and annual reports required to be filed, and that these records must be maintained in reasonable order to permit audit?�;`�J 22. Does your organization understand that inst be conducted at such time as regular bingo s in pro ant Bingo may only only at such loc ions and at such times as are sp cifiegr, and d ess this application? 23. Does your organization understand that the gross receipts in the course of a reporting year from the Plinginstant ino may not exceed 33 1/3% of the gross rece pts of anf organizationgs Bingo operation? 24. Does your organization understand it may not sell a )i stan bingo card to an individual below sixteen t years of age? 7 K-2. 25. Does your organization understand that an organization whose gross receipts from all bingo operations that exceed or are expected to exceed $75, 000 in any calendar year shall have been granted tax-exempt status pursuant to Section 501C Internal Revenue Code Service? F' ,(Certificate must be attached.) 26. Does your organization understand that a Certificate of Occupancy must be obtained qr be on file which authorizes this us at the proposed location? e 27. Does Lyour organization understand that awards or or merchandis valued in excess of the following amounts are illegal? prize money g 10 a. No door prize shall exceed twenty-five dollars. b. No regular Bingo or special Bingo game shall exceed Hundred dollars. One C. No jackpot of any nature whatsoever shall exceed One Thousand Dollars, nor shall the total amount of jackpot prizes awarded in any one calendar day exceed One Thousand Dollars. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * NOTARIZATION: THE FOLLOWING OATH MUST BE TAKEN BY ALL APPLICANTS I hereby swear or affirm under theies forth in 518.2 of the Code of Virginia that all Of perjury utheas set statements are true to the best of m beliefs. y knowled a above All questions have been answered. g information, and gned by: ..n ,_ h _ n , n . %n Name tie He Address e me, this dm Subscribed and sworn - beforj� in the County/City of —! —day of19� . My commission expires: Virginia My com' .. Z . -4-!rr"% 20 'Wh N tary Publi RETURN THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION T0: COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE P.O. BOX 20409 ROANOKE, VA 24018-0513 8 K -i NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED The above application, having been found in due form, is approved and issued to the applicant to have effect until December 31st of this calendar year. Date w ommissi ner of the enue The above application is not approved Date Commissioner of the Revenue E A -72892-7.c ACTION NO. ITEM NUMBER AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 28, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Acceptance of a Grant by the County Library for VLIN online database service. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND: The Roanoke County Public Library has been notified by the Virginia State Library and Archives that it has been awarded a $12,425 grant under Title I of the Library Services and Construction Act. This grant will allow the Library to purchase equipment and software to access the VLIN database. This new database will include the holdings records of the majority of Virginia libraries. The Library will search VLIN to fill requests for materials which are not available locally. When the equipment is not needed for this interlibrary loan function, it will be used for clerical and bibliographic tasks. FISCAL IMPACT: The State Library will provide a toll-free number for VLIN. The only anticipated ongoing cost would be the maintenance costs for the equipment which would be absorbed by the Library budget. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the acceptance of said grant in order to provide access to the state-wide information network. Respectfully submitted, Approved by, ---� L < Spen er Watts Elmer C. Hodg Library Director County Administrator 0 K-2 ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson No Yes Absent Denied ( ) Received ( ) Referred ( ) To ( ) cc: File Spencer Watts, Library Director Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget Eddy x Johnson x Kohinke x Minnix x Nickens ACTION # A -72892-7.d ITEM NUMBER K— MEETING DATE: July 28, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Request for an Appropriation of $675.00 to the School Grant Fund for a Transition Program Support Mini -Grant COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: BACKGROUND The Pupil Personnel Department submitted to the Virginia Department of Education a proposed project for funding to employ teachers during the summer of 1992 to integrate transition activities into the curriculum guide for all students with disabilities. The summer curriculum revision will update current guides to include specific transition activities, finalized forms, and process activities. SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The Roanoke County School Board received from the department of education a mini -grant in the amount of $675.00 for the project as proposed. Teachers have been employed and are now in the process of doing the transition work. FISCAL IMPACT: None. No matching funds are involved. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends appropriation of $675.00 to the School Grant Fund. Eddie L. Kolb, Director of Pupil Personnel Services ��.✓ Y ori Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ACTION VOTE No Yes Absent Approved ( x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson Eddy x Denied ( ) Johnson x Received ( ) Kohinke x Referred ( ) Minnix —x To Nickens cc: File Dr. Bayes Wilson, Superintendent, Roanoke County Schools Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance K-4 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF ROANOKE COUNTY AT 7 P.M. ON JULY 9, 1992 IN THE BOARD ROOM OF THE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, SALEM, VIRGINIA. RESOLUTION REQUESTING AN APPROPRIATION TO THE SCHOOL GRANT FUND FOR A TRANSITION PROGRAM SUPPORT MINI -GRANT WHEREAS, the County School Board of Roanoke County has been awarded a transition program support mini -grant in the amount of $675.00 to employ teachers during the summer of 1992 to integrate transition activities for youth with disabilities into the curriculum guide; BE IT RESOLVED that the County School Board of Roanoke County on motion of Barbara B. Chewning and duly seconded requests the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County to appropriate $675.00 to the School Grant Fund for the purpose as set forth. Adopted on the following recorded vote: AYES: Jerry L. Canada, Barbara B. Chewning, Maurice L. Mitchell, Frank E. Thomas NAYS: None ABSENT: Charlsie S. Pafford TESTE: Clerk c: Mrs. Diane Hyatt ACTION NO. A -72892-7.e ITEM NUMBER k--5 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER MEETING DATE: July 28, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Acknowledgement of Acceptance of 0.60 Miles of Edgebrook Road into the Secondary System by the Virginia Department of Transportation COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Roanoke County has received acknowledgement that the following road has been accepted into the Secondary System by the Virginia Department of Transportation effective July 1, 1992. Edgebrook Road 0.60 Miles of Edgebrook Road (Route 1150) SUBMITTED BY: v Mary H. Allen Clerk to the Board APPROV D BY: Elmer C. Hodge County Administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACTION VOTE Approved (K) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson No Yes Absent Denied ( ) Eddy x Received ( ) Kohinke x Referred ( ) Johnson x To ( ) Minnix x Nickens x cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 28, 1992 RESOLUTION 72892-7.f OPPOSING FEDERAL LEGISLATION CONCERNING THE REPORTING OF PROPERTY TABES TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WHEREAS, a Bill has been approved by the Ways and Means Committee of the United States House of Representatives, and is currently being considered by the full House, which would require state and local governments to itemize property tax bills in order to distinguish deductible taxes from non-deductible fees; and WHEREAS, the Bill would further require that state and local governments prepare IRS 1099 forms for all taxpayers, and to mail those forms both to the taxpayers and to the Internal Revenue Services; and WHEREAS, the information is currently available to the Internal Revenue Service on a case-by-case basis during an audit of an individual taxpayer; and WHEREAS, the cost of changing computer systems to separate the information into the required categories, and the additional cost of preparing and mailing these forms would be an unnecessary, unfair and burdensome cost on each local government and its taxpayers. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia does hereby strongly object to the proposed bill, introduced by Rep. William Coyne (D -Pa), and urges its representatives in Congress to work for its defeat; and FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that copies of this resolution be transmitted immediately to the Honorable John Warner, the Honorable Charles Robb, the Honorable Jim Olin and the Honorable Rick Boucher. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Eddy NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk cc: File Roanoke County Board of Supervisors The Honorable John Warner The Honorable Charles Robb The Honorable Jim Olin The Honorable Rick Boucher The Honorable Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer Anne Marie Green, Public Information Officer V AT A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 280 1992 RESOLUTION 72892-8 CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia has convened an. executive meeting on this date pursuant to an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to the best of each members knowledge: 1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and 2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the certification resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Eddy NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Executive Session AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 28, 1992 RESOLUTION 72892-9 APPROVING AND THE ADOPTION OF THE FUNDING OF THE SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM SIB -YEAR CONSTRUCTION PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992-93 WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on July 28, 1992, to receive comments on the adoption of the funding for the Secondary Road System Six -Year Construction Plan for Roanoke County for Fiscal Year 1992-93; and WHEREAS, The Board does hereby approve the adoption of the funding for the Secondary Road System Six -Year Construction Plan for Roanoke County for Fiscal Year 1992-93 as set out on the attached construction program allocations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution duly attested be forthwith forwarded to the Virginia Department of Transportation Salem Residency Office along with a duly attested copy of the proposed Secondary Road System Six -Year Construction Plan for Roanoke County for Fiscal Year 1992-93 by the Clerk to the Board. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Eddy NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk cc: File Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Jeff Echols, Resident Engineer, VDOT AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER ON TUESDAY, JULY 28, 1992 ORDINANCE 72892-10 AMENDING AND READOPTING ARTICLE I IIIN GENERAL," OF CHAPTER 21 $'TAXATION" OF THE ROANOKE COUNTY CODE BY THE ADDITION OF A NEW SECTION 21-8 "ADMINISTRATIVE FEES FOR TAX COLLECTION BY LEGAL ACTION" WHEREAS, Section 58.1-3958 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, authorizes a local governing body to impose on delinquent taxpayers a fee to cover administrative costs associated with the collection of delinquent taxes; and, WHEREAS, the Treasurer of Roanoke County has recommended that the Board of Supervisors adopt such an ordinance; and, WHEREAS, the Board hereby determines that the adoption of this ordinance is in the public interest since it places a portion of the costs of collection upon those individuals requiring such collection actions; and WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on July 14, 1992; and the second reading and public hearing was held on July 28, 1992. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board \of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1) That Article I. "IN GENERAL" of Chapter 21. "TAXATION" of the Roanoke County Code, is hereby amended and readopted by the addition of a new section as follows: Section 21-8. Administrative Fees for Tax Collection by Legal Action There is hereby imposed upon the person or persons owing any tax levied by the County a fee to cover the administrative costs 1 associated with the collection of delinquent taxes. This fee shall be in the amount of Twenty ($20.00) Dollars for taxes collected subsequent to the filing of a warrant or other appropriate legal document but prior to judgment, and Twenty -Five ($25.00) Dollars for taxes collected subsequent to judgment. Such fee shall be in addition to all penalties and interest. Nothing in this ordinance shall foreclose the County's collection of additional or higher fees and costs, where allowed by general law of the Commonwealth. 2) That the effective date of this ordinance shall be from and after July 28, 1992. On motion of Supervisor Kohinke to adopt the ordinance, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Eddy NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens cc: File Circuit Court C. O. Clemens, Judge Kenneth Trabuc, Judge Steven A. McGraw, Clerk Family Court Services Joseph M. Clark, H, Judge Philip Trompetere, Judge Peggy H. Gray, Clerk Michael Lazzuri, Court Services Intake Counsellor General District Court John L Apostolou, Judge George Harris, Judge Theresa A. Childress, Clerk Skip Burkart, Commonwealth Attorney Paul M. Mahoney, County Attorney Magistrates Sherri KrantV'Betty Perry A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors Main Library John H. Cease, Police Chief Roanoke Law Library, 315 Church Avenue, S.W., Rke 24016 Roanoke County Code Book Gerald S. Holt, Sheriff John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant County Administrator Diane D. Hyatt, Director, Finance O. Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Terrance L Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning Kenneth L Hogan, Chief Animal Control Officer Alfred C. Anderson, Treasurer R. Wayne Compton, Commissioner of Revenue 2 AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER, TUESDAY, JULY 28, 1992 ORDINANCE 72892-11 TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF A .9 ACRE TRACT OF REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 4616 LAYMAN ROAD (TAX MAP NO. 40.04-1-58) IN THE HOLLINS MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FROM THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF M-2 TO THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF R-1 UPON THE APPLICATION OF MARTHA C. CHINAULT WHEREAS, the first reading of this ordinance was held on June 23, 1992, and the second reading and public hearing was held July 28, 1992; and, WHEREAS, the Roanoke County Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter on July 7, 1992; and, WHEREAS, legal notice and advertisement has been provided as required by law. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, as follows: 1. That the zoning classification of a certain tract of real estate containing .9 acre, as described herein, and located at 4616 Layman Road, (Tax Map Number 40.04-1-58) in the Hollins Magisterial District, is hereby changed from the zoning classification of M-2, General Industrial District, to the zoning classification of R-1, Single Family Residential District. 2. That this action is taken upon the application of Martha C. Chinault. 3. That said real estate is more fully described as follows: Beginning at a point in the center line of Glade Creek at a point where same intersects the northerly right-of-way line of State Route No. 606 and said point being 25 feet north of the said center line of State Route No. 606; thence running along the northerly right-of- Ll way line of Route No. 606 and being 25 feet north and parallel to the said center line of same a distance of 440 feet, more or less, to a point where said highway right-of-way line intersects the easterly right-of-way line of the N&W Railway Company and said point being 40 feet east of the said center line of the easternmost track; thence along the easterly right-of-way line of said railway company 40 feet east and parallel to the center line of the easternmost track 130 feet, more or less, to a point in said right-of-way line where same intersects the center line of Glade Creek; thence leaving the railway company's right-of-way line and running down the center line of Glade Creek 305 feet, more or less, with the meanders thereof to a point in center line of Glade Creek where same intersects the northerly right-of-way line of Route No. 606, the point of Beginning, and containing 0.90 acre, more or less. 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance be, and the same hereby are, repealed. On motion of Supervisor Johnson to adopt the resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote: AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Eddy NAYS: None ABSENT: Supervisor Nickens A COPY TESTE: Mary H. Allen, Clerk Roanoke County Board of Supervisors cc: File Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections Terry Harrington, Director, Planning & Zoning John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment Paul Mahoney, County Attorney