HomeMy WebLinkAbout8/11/1992 - Adopted Board RecordsACTION NO.
A-81192-1
ITEM NUMBER
-D-I
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: August 11, 1992
AGENDA ITEM: Acceptance of the Local Government Challenge Grant
from the Virginia Commission for the Arts.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: Roanoke County, each year, applies for the
Local Government Challenge Grant. The Virginia Commission for the
Arts will match up to $5,000, any donation the County makes to
qualified art organizations in the valley.
In the FY 1992-93 Budget, the Board of Supervisors approved an
appropriation of $2,500 each for the Arts Council of the Blue Ridge
and the Roanoke Symphony. Roanoke County, therefore, applied for
the maximum grant allocation of $5,000 and was awarded $2,000 for
FY 1992-93. This amount is down from previous years due to the
significant budget cuts suffered by state agencies in the 1992-94
biennium.
FISCAL IMPACT: Staff recommends dividing the $2,000 grant evenly
between the Arts Council of the Blue Ridge and the Roanoke
Symphony. Combined with the County's appropriation, the following
donation would be available to the organizations referred to above:
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of the Local
Government Challenge Grant from the Virginia Commission for the
Arts in the amount of $2,000.
Respectpfully submitted,
" !�
Reta R. Busher
Director of Management
and Budget
Appr ved by,
/,
t-, , "
� -
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
County
VCA
Organization
Appropriation
Grant
Total
Arts Council of the
Blue Ridge
$2,500
$1,000
$3,500
Roanoke Symphony
2,500
1.000
3,500
$5,000
$2,000
$7,000
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of the Local
Government Challenge Grant from the Virginia Commission for the
Arts in the amount of $2,000.
Respectpfully submitted,
" !�
Reta R. Busher
Director of Management
and Budget
Appr ved by,
/,
t-, , "
� -
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
----------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (x) Motion by: Bob L. Johnson No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) motion to accept grant for Eddy x
Received ( ) $2,000 Johnson x
Referred ( ) Kohinke x
To ( ) Minnix x
Nickens x
cc: File
Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 11, 1992
RESOLUTION 81192-2 E%PRESSING THE INTENTION OF
THE COUNTY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA TO IMPLEMENT
AND ENFORCE THE PROVISIONS OF THE DRUG-FREE
WORKPLACE ACT
WHEREAS, the Congress of the United States has enacted
the "Drug -Free Workplace Act," P.L. 100-690, 41 U.S.C. § 701-707,
which requires any grantee of federal funds to certify as a
condition of the receipt of such funds that it will provide a drug-
free workplace by taking certain steps including establishing a
drug-free awareness program, publishing notice of the requirements
of this act to all employees, and maintaining a good faith effort
to maintain a drug-free workplace; and
WHEREAS, it is the intention of the County of Roanoke,
Virginia, to fully comply with the requirements of the "Drug -Free
Workplace Act" and to inform its employees of the requirements of
this law; and
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That the policy entitled "DRUGS IN THE WORKPLACE" is
adopted as the official policy of the County of Roanoke, Virginia,
pursuant to the "Drug -Free Workplace Act", P.L. 100-690 as follows:
DRUGS IN THE WORKPLACE
DRUG-FREE WORKING ENVIRONMENT
The Roanoke County Board of Supervisors is committed to
providing a drug-free working environment for all employees. The
unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use
of a controlled substance by an employee in the Roanoke County
workplace is prohibited and is cause for immediate dismissal. No
employee shall distribute, dispense, possess, use or be under the
influence of any alcoholic beverage or other intoxicating liquors.
It is the intent of Roanoke County to fully comply with the
requirements of the Drug -Free Workplace Act.
The Drug -Free Workplace Act also requires that employees
notify their employer of any criminal drug statute conviction for
a violation occurring in the workplace within five days of such
conviction. Information about an employee's conviction should be
provided to the Director of Human Resources at 772-2018. This
requirement constitutes a condition of employment for all Roanoke
County employees.
SUBSTANCE ABUSE AWARENESS
DANGERS OF DRUG ABUSE IN THE WORKPLACE
A. Accidents involving self or others when impaired by
alcohol or other drugs or when suffering withdrawal
symptoms.
B. Negative effects on health of abuser, damages pancreas
and liver, increases heart rate and blood pressure, and
may adversely affect kidneys, lungs, stomach, small
intestines, and nervous system depending upon type of
drug used, frequency, and amount of drug use.
C. Impairs judgment.
D. May contribute to violence or other behavioral problems.
E. Reduces productivity.
EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
Any employee who feels that he or she has developed an
addiction to, dependence upon or problem with alcohol or drugs,
legal or illegal, is encouraged to seek assistance. Assistance may
be sought by contacting the Roanoke County Employee Assistance
Program (EAP).
The Employee Assistance Program is available to assist
employees and their families. The program is completely
confidential.
2. That the Department of Human Resources is directed to
take all necessary steps to insure that this policy is published
as a notice to all employees of the county and to distribute a copy
of this policy to all employees of the county. Further, the
Department of Human Resources is charged with the responsibility of
insuring that employees abide by the terms of this policy and that
the provisions of the policy are implemented.
3. That this resolution shall be in full force and effect on
and after August 11, 1992.
On motion of Supervisor Minnix to adopt the resolution, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources
Mary Hicks, Executive Secretary
Larry Logan, Fire & Rescue
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 11, 1992
ORDINANCE 81192-3 FOR AUTHORIZATION TO ACQUIRE
NECESSARY EASEMENTS AND PROPERTY TO CONSTRUCT
THE SOUTH TRANSMISSION LINE AND THE STARKEY
ROAD WATER PROJECT
WHEREAS, location plans for the South Transmission Line
Project and the Starkey Road Water Line Project have been completed
and the projects will require acquisition of property and easements
across certain properties; and,
WHEREAS, said property and easements are to be acquired to
facilitate any future construction of the water line project; and,
WHEREAS, Section 18.04 of the Roanoke County Charter directs
that the acquisition of real estate be accomplished by ordinance;
the first reading of this ordinance was held on July 28, 1992, and
the second reading was held on August 11, 1992.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
ROANOKE COUNTY, VIRGINIA, as follows:
1. That the acquisition and acceptance of the necessary
easements and property for the South Transmission Line Project and
the Starkey Road Water Project are hereby authorized across the
following properties, referenced by Tax Map Number, from the
following property owners, their successors or assigns:
Tax Map No.
97.08-01-40
97.08-01-42
97.08-01-41
97.08-01-39
97.08-01-38
97.08-01-37
97.08-01-36
97.08-01-35
97.05-01-26
Property Owner
Acquisition
Mills, Frank E. Easement
Casey, James W. Jr. & Margarette E. Fee Simple
Mills, Frank E. Easement
Webb, William H. & Eva J. Easement
Pope, Reuben Eric & Dossie R. Easement
Austin, Jennie Easement
McConnell, David W. & Cammie P. Easement
McConnell, David W. & Cammie P. Easement
Taylor, D. M. Heirs Easement
Tax Map No.
Property Owner
Acquisition
97.02-01-10
Palm Hermitage Corp.
Easement
97.05-01-06
Guilliams, Lewis & Clyde
Easement
97.05-01-04
Stoots, Gary & Susan
Easement
97.01-01-06
Hackley, T. R.
Easement
97.01-01-05.2
Knighton, Eugene B.
Easement
97.01-01-03
Board, G. H.
Easement
97.01-01-1.1
Blankenship, Edward & Lois
Easement
97.01-02-17
Beasley, Nicholas H.
Easement
97.01-02-09
Kidd, David E. & Virginia L.
Easement
97.01-02-05
Steele, T. D.
Easement
97.01-02-03
Janosko, George
Easement
97.01-02-02
Janosko, George R. & Wanda C.
Easement
96.08-01-04
Steele, T. D.
Easement
96.02-01-46
Beasley, Nicholas H.
Easement
96.02-01-45
Sigmon, Norma J.
Easement
96.02-01-39
Gordon, Michael J.
Easement
96.02-01-38
Musgrove, Bruce A.
Easement
96.02-01-37
Mormon Church
Easement
86.03-04-06
Ridgeway, Robert L. Et Als
Easement
86.03-04-04
Muse, Paul T.
Easement
86.03-04-03
Muse, Charles M.
Easement
86.03-04-02.1
Bauman, Scott W. & Kathy H.
Easement
86.03-04-02
Bauman, Scott W. & Kathy H.
Easement
86.03-04-01.1
Metheny, Mary M.
Easement
86.03-04-01
Martin, Frank W.
Easement
86.03-02-09
Draper, Shirley R. & Gladys S.
Easement
86.03-02-07
White, Charles E. & J. Kimberly
Easement
86.03-02-03
Draper, Shirley R. & Gladys S.
Easement
86.03-02-02
Draper, Shirley R. & Gladys S.
Easement
86.03-01-38
Bauman, Scott W. & Kathy H.
Easement
86.01-03-01
Grisso, Edwin O.
Easement
86.01-01-49
Minter, Marie H.
Easement
86.01-01-19
Wirth, Verla S.
Easement
86.01-01-17
Poage, Lewis S.
Easement
86.01-02-03
Peoples, George D. & Deborah S.
Easement
86.01-02-01
Arthur, David M. & Mollie B.
Easement
86.01-02-01.2
Neal, Denver D. & Kum Cha
Easement
76.03-07-05.1
Wertz, Bennie L. & Jean P.
Easement
76.03-04-32
Boone, L.
Easement
76.03-04-31
Harman, Richard E. & Margaret P.
Easement
76.03-04-30
Harman, Richard E. & Margaret P.
Easement
76.03-03-83
Minnix C. E. & Jessie V.
Easement
76.03-03-76
Minnix C. E. & Jessie V.
Easement
76.03-03-70
Wallace, Jean O.
Easement
76.01-01-04
Jamison, V. E., M. A., & D. A.
Easement
76.01-01-21
Porter, F. D. & McFarland, J. G.
Easement
76.01-01-14
Porter, Frank D., III & Beverly V.
Easement
76.01-01-13
Porter, Frank D., III, Et Al
Easement
76.01-01-12
Porter, Frank D., III & Beverly V.
Easement
66.04-02-15
Malley, Margaret L.
Easement
66.04-02-17
Minnix, Roy W. & Evelyn K.
Easement
66.04-02-15.2
Powell, Barbara B.
Easement
Tax Map No. Property Owner Acquisition
66.04-02-15.1
66.04-02-13
66.04-01-11
66.04-01-14
66.04-01-46
66.04-01-19
66.04-01-18
66.04-01-17
66.04-01-16
66.04-01-15
66.01-01-07
Minnix,
Roy W. &
Evelyn K.
Easement
Powell,
Barbara
B.
Easement
Double
R Corporation
Easement
Swope,
John D. &
Emily P.
Easement
Coates,
Fred B.,
Jr., & Rita A.
Easement
FFE Development
Corporation
Easement
Tetreau, Michael
C.
Easement
Clowers, Jesse Wayne
& Brenda Cronk
Easement
Baron,
Maryhelen
F.
Easement
Baron,
Maryhelen
F.
Easement
Sears,
Merriman
Easement
2. That the consideration for each easement acquisition
shall not exceed a value equal to 40% of the current tax assessment
for the property to be acquired plus the cost of actual damages, if
any. Fee simple property acquisition shall not exceed a value
equal to 100% of the current tax assessment for the property to be
acquired; and
3. That the consideration for each easement shall be paid
from the South Transmission Line Project and the Starkey Road Water
Line Project funds; and,
4. That the County Administrator is hereby authorized to
execute such documents and take such actions as may be necessary to
accomplish this acquisition, all of which shall be on form approved
by the County Attorney.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the ordinance, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
r9/ �✓
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
cc: File Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Clifford Craig, Director, Utility
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections
John Willey, Director, Real Estate Assessment
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 11, 1992
RESOLUTION 81192-4 APPROVING AND CONCURRING IN
CERTAIN ITEMS SET FORTH ON THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS AGENDA FOR THIS DATE DESIGNATED AS
ITEM J - CONSENT AGENDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, as follows:
1. that the certain section of the agenda of the Board
of Supervisors for August 11, 1992 designated as Item J- Consent
Agenda be, and hereby is, approved and concurred in as to each item
separately set forth in said section designated Items 1 through 6,
inclusive, as follows:
1. Approval of Minutes - June 23, 1992, July 14, 1992,
July 21, 1992.
2. Confirmation of Committee Appointments to Community
Corrections Resources Board and the Highway and
Transportation Safety Commission.
3. Authorization to Amend Interjurisdictional
Pretreatment Agreement.
4. Request for Acceptance of Carriage Hills Drive into
the Virginia Department of Transportation Secondary
System.
5. Reallocation of Funds for Well at Hofauger House
(Explore).
6. Approval of Amendments to the Americans with
Disabilities Act Transition Plan adopted July 14,
1992.
2. That the Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized and
directed where required by law to set forth upon any of said items
the separate vote tabulation for any such item pursuant to this
resolution.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the Consent
Resolution with Item 2 removed, and carried by the following
recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy
NAYS: None
On motion of Supervisor Minnix to approve Item 2 with the
confirmation of Robert Johnson to the Highway and Transportation
Safety Commission removed, and carried by the following recorded
vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Clifford Craig, Director, Utility
Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections
Timothy Gubala, Director, Economic Development
John Chambliss, Assistant County Administrator
ACTION NO.
A -81192-4.a
ITEM NUMBER J—
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: August 11, 1992
AGENDA ITEM: Confirmation of Committee Appointments to the
Community Corrections Resources Board and the
Highway and Transportation Safety Commission
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
Community Corrections Resources Board
Supervisor Eddy nominated Mrs. Chris Pickard to serve another one-
year term as an alternate. Her term will expire August 13, 1993.
Highway and Transportation Safety Commission
Supervisor Minnix nominated Glenn Siverling to
serve four year terms expiring June 30, 1996.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the above nominees be appointed.
Mary H. Allen
Clerk to the Board
Approved (x)
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred ( )
To ( )
S42." //4��
Elmer C. Hodge
County Administrator
ACTION VOTE
Motion by: H. Odell Minnix motion No Yes Abs
to approve with confirmation Eddy x
of Robert Johnson to Highway Johnson x
and Transportation Safety Kohinke x
Commission removed Minnix x
Nickens x
cc; File
Community Corrections Resources Board File
Highway and Transportation Safety Commission File
ACTION # A -81192-4.b
ITEM NUMBER J-'3
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: August 11, 1992
AGENDA ITEM: Authorization to Amend Interjurisdictional
Pretreatment Agreement
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS :-`r`� 4
vr
J
BACKGROUND:
Roanoke County and the City of Roanoke entered into an
Interjurisdictional Pretreatment Agreement on March 28, 1989 in
order to comply with the conditions of the City of Roanoke sewage
discharge permit issued by the Virginia State Water Control Board.
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION:
The State Water Control Board has issued the City of Roanoke a
Special Consent Order relative to the sewage discharge permit. one
of the provisions listed in the Special Consent Orders is to amend
the interjurisdictional pretreatment agreement to require Roanoke
County to provide reporting to the City of Roanoke on a quarterly
basis. The existing interjurisdictional pretreatment agreement
requires reporting within two weeks of receipt of relevant
information.
The attached Interjurisdictional Pretreatment Agreement has been
changed to reflect quarterly reporting by Roanoke County. The
changes consist of adding the words, "On a quarterly basis," in
item 7 on page 5 and deleting the sentence "Roanoke County shall
provide the City of Roanoke copies of said reports within two weeks
of the receipt or generation of said reports by Roanoke County," in
item 7 on page 6.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors authorize the County
Administrator to execute the amended Interjurisdictional
Pretreatment Agreement.
SUBMITTED BY:
c�
Cliffor r ig, P.E.
Utility Di ector
APPROVED:
Etmier C. Hodge
County Administrator
J-3
ACTION VOTE
Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Eddy x
Received ( ) Johnson _x
Referred Kohinke x
to Minnix x
Nickens _x
cc: File
Clifford Craig, Director, Utility
Paul Mahoney, County Attorney
Interjurisdictional Pretreatment Agreement
Between
City of Roanoke
And
Roanoke County
This Agreement is entered into this day of ,
19 between the City of Roanoke and Roanoke County.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the City of Roanoke owns and operates a
wastewater treatment system and,
WHEREAS, Roanoke County currently utilized this
wastewater treatment system pursuant to the Service Agreement
between the City of Roanoke and Roanoke County dated March 17,
1972; and
WHEREAS, the City of Roanoke has developed and
implemented an industrial pretreatment program pursuant to
conditions contained in its discharge permit #VA002520 issued by
Virginia State Water Control Board; and
WHEREAS, Section VII (B) of the above mentioned Service
Agreement includes provisions to comply with lawful orders
concerning matters of pretreating wastes, and
WHEREAS, Roanoke County desires to continue to utilize
the wastewater treatment system and recognizes its industrial
waste control obligation under 40 CRF 403.
1
=3
In consideration of the following terms and conditions the
City of Roanoke and Roanoke County agree:
1. Roanoke County shall adopt and diligently enforce a sewer
use ordinance which is identical to the sewer use ordinance
adopted by the City of Roanoke. Additionally, Roanoke
County shall include a provision in its sewer use ordinance
requiring any industrial user responsible for an accidental
discharge to notify immediately both the City of Roanoke and
Roanoke County. In order that the Roanoke County sewer use
ordinance be adequate to administer the industrial
pretreatment program within Roanoke County, the City of
Roanoke shall explicitly incorporate the following
provisions into its sewer use ordinance;
(a) a prohibition on the use of dilution as a control
technique for compliance with discharge limits except as
allowed by Federal Pretreatment Standards;
(b) a grant of authority to impose mass discharge limits in
lieu of, or in conjunction with, concentration discharge
limits;
(c) a prohibition against and penalty for the knowing
transmittal of false information by an industrial user in
any reports they are required to submit;
(d) a grant of explicit authority to require the
installation of all monitoring and pretreatment facilities.
2
T-3
2. The City of Roanoke and Roanoke County shall periodically
(at a minimum of every three (3) years review their
respective ordinances and jointly draft and adopt equivalent
amendments to their respective ordinances when necessary to
ensure the effective administration and operation of the
pretreatment program. Whenever either the City of Roanoke
or Roanoke County becomes aware of a problem with the
pretreatment program which can be mitigated by a change in
the sewer use ordinance, the City of Roanoke may adopt an
amendment which Roanoke County shall adopt. The City of
Roanoke ordinance shall not contain more stringent
requirements to be met by industrial users in Roanoke County
than are required to be met by industrial users within the
City of Roanoke. The Roanoke County sewer use ordinance
shall always remain identical to or more stringent than the
City of Roanoke sewer use ordinance.
3. The City of Roanoke ordinance shall require that the
categorical pretreatment standards promulgated by the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (promulgated by
authority of the Clean Water Act Section 307(B) and (C)) be
automatically incorporated by reference into the City of
Roanoke ordinance. The identical ordinance adopted by
Roanoke County will, therefore, contain those same
3
T-3
provisions. These standards shall supersede any specific
discharge limits in the ordinance which are less stringent
than the categorical standard as they apply to a particular
industry subcategory. '
4. Roanoke County shall notify all affected industrial users of
pertinent categorical standards and monitoring and reporting
requirements contained in 40 CFR 403.12 or included as part
of the categorical standard. Roanoke County shall provide
the City of Roanoke with copies of all required reports and
monitoring documentation for submittal to the appropriate
regulatory agencies by October of each year or as determined
by the City of Roanoke.
5. The City of Roanoke shall make the final determination as to
whether a particular industrial user is classified as a
significant industrial user or an industrial user based on
information the City of Roanoke may request from Roanoke
County. Roanoke County shall control, through industrial
discharge permits, industrial waste discharge from each
significant user or industrial user discharging into the
public sewer. Roanoke County shall provide draft discharge
permits to the City of Roanoke for review and incorporate
any changes legally required by the City of Roanoke.
6. If there exists any industrial user discharging to Roanoke
County public sewer system but located outside the
4
:Y-3
jurisdictional limits of Roanoke County, then Roanoke County
shall negotiate and enter into an agreement with this
outside jurisdiction. Such agreement shall be substantially
equivalent to this Agreement, and shall be jointly executed
by Roanoke County, the City of Roanoke and the outside
jurisdiction. If the outside jurisdiction refuses to
negotiate and execute an agreement, then Roanoke County
shall enter into a contract with the industrial user which
contains terms and conditions substantially equivalent to
Roanoke County industrial discharge permits.
7. Roanoke County shall file with the City of Roanoke a
certified copy of its ordinance and any amendments thereto,
other interjurisdictional agreements relative to sewer use,
each industrial waste discharge permit issued, and any
contract entered into for the purpose of industrial waste
control within sanitary sewers. In October of each year,
Roanoke County shall submit a report to the City of Roanoke
which summarizes the pretreatment activities; inspection,
sampling, self-monitoring, compliance status, enforcement
actions, permit status, and industrial waste survey updates
conducted by Roanoke County. On a quarterly basis, Roanoke
County shall provide the City of Roanoke copies of all
industrial monitoring report including 40 CFR 403.12
compliance reports, self-monitoring reports, baseline
9
T-3
reports, records of violations and action taken, and any
other monitoring or reporting requirements legally imposed
by Federal, State or local regulations.
These reports, records and
relevant information shall be maintained for at least three
(3) years.
8. Any authorized officer or employee of the City of Roanoke
may enter and inspect at any reasonable time any part of the
public sewer system of Roanoke County. The right to entry
and inspection shall extend to public streets, easements,
and property within which the public system is located.
Additionally, the City of Roanoke shall be permitted when
accompanied by an authorized representative of Roanoke
County, and as appropriate, to enter onto private property
to inspect industrial waste dischargers. Roanoke County
shall make all necessary legal and administrative
arrangements for these inspections. The right of inspection
shall include on-site inspection of pretreatment and sewer
facilities, observation, measurement, sampling, testing, and
access to (with right to copy) all pertinent compliance
records located on the premises of the industrial user.
9. The City of Roanoke shall review the Roanoke County
ordinance and amendments thereto, and any
M
7-3
interjurisdictional agreements for conformance with 40 CFR
Part 403, and to ensure inclusion of all other legal
provisions mandated by this Agreement. The City of Roanoke
shall periodically review the enforcement efforts of Roanoke
County to ascertain whether pretreatment requirements are
being diligently enforced.
10. If the City of Roanoke determines that Roanoke County has
failed or has refused to fulfill any legal pretreatment
obligations, the City of Roanoke may develop and issue a
remedial plan containing a description of the nature of the
pretreatment deficiencies, an enumeration of steps to be
taken by Roanoke County, and a time schedule for attaining
compliance with all pretreatment requirements. Such plans
shall be specifically enforceable in a court of competent
jurisdiction. Where Roanoke County fails to satisfy the
terms of the remedial plan, the City of Roanoke may, upon
thirty (30) days written notice, refuse to accept any
industrial waste discharges from Roanoke County. Roanoke
County shall reimburse the City of Roanoke for fines or
costs stemming from injury to City of Roanoke personnel,
damages to the City of Roanoke facilities, disruption of
treatment processes or operations, degradation of sludge
quality, NPDES permit violations, and other air, water, and
7
I_3
sludge quality violations proven to have been caused by a
failure to Roanoke County to fulfill its pretreatment
obligations.
11. Where a discharge to the City of Roanoke wastewater
treatment system reasonable appears to present an imminent
danger to the health and welfare of persons, or presents or
may present an imminent danger to the environment, or
threatens to interfere with the operation of the wastewater
treatment system, the City of Roanoke may immediately
initiate steps to identify the source of discharge, and to
halt or prevent said discharge. The City of Roanoke may
seek injunctive relief against Roanoke County and/or any
industrial user contributing to the emergency condition,
and/or may pursue other self-help remedies. .
12. The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be
interpreted in accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth
of Virginia.
13. The terms of this Agreement may be amended only by written
agreement of the parties.
14. This Agreement will remain in effect so long as the Service
Agreement dated March 17, 1972 remains in effect.
Termination of the Service Agreement shall also result in
the termination of this agreement.
FP
.7-3
The parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date
shown above.
County Administrator
Roanoke County, VA
Attest
City Manager
City of Roanoke, VA
Attest
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
CENTER ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 11, 1992
RESOLUTION 81192-4.0 REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF
CARRIAGE HILLS DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT
OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia, as follows:
1. That this matter came this day to be heard upon the
proceedings herein, and upon the application of Carriage Hills
Drive from the intersection of Fernway Drive ( Route 1791) to the
cul-de-sac for a distance of 0.23 miles to be accepted and made a
part of the Secondary System of State Highways under Section 33.1-
229 of the Virginia State Code.
2. That it appears to the Board that drainage easements and
a fifty (50) foot right-of-way for said road have heretofore been
dedicated by virtue of a certain map known as Carriage Hills,
Section 4, Subdivision which map was recorded in Plat Book 10, Page
134, of the records of the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of
Roanoke County, Virginia, on March 10, 1988 and that by reason of
the recordation of said map no report from a Board of Viewers, nor
consent or donation of right-of-way from the abutting property
owners is necessary. The Board hereby guarantees said drainage
easements and a right-of-way for the street.
3. That said road known as Carriage Hills Drive and which
is shown on a certain sketch accompanying this Resolution, be, and
the same is hereby established as a public road to become a part of
the State Secondary System of Highways in Roanoke County, only from
and after notification of official acceptance of said street or
highway by the Virginia Department of Transportation.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the resolution, and
carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Arnold Covey, Director, Engineering & Inspections
copy for Virginia Department of Transportation
-.\
775
792 n2
1793
'.T 179; 774 GN
7
791 221
0
179
870 n
pd3 C 752
759
_ - --~ VICINITY_ MAP' -
7-
1
G LOCK
12
49
cl
s � 3LOCK 1❑ �S' n\ »,saw•
7 J1e I ^ j i.. '4.• l
'•; .. ark. /•C% �e`
� �• „ .,, .. 4., arr 5
`t 76
I
`17
c
U. _. ar n•• a �'
SC2*5mi-E 75.-
V r
zz
P � a
i
�9J-�•h -sJy Il xl
ti
i! -i
h e27J7r 1 ,OO.ar
s a7rosJe� I� •, ]M
xa —�-
PROPOSED ADDITION SHOWN IN GRAY
DESCRIPTION:
1) CARRIAGE HILLS DRIVE FROM THE INTERSECTION OF FERNWAY DRIVE (ROUTE 1791)
TO THE CUL-DE-SAC.
LENGTH: (1) 0.23 MILES
RIGHT OF WAY: (1) 50 FEET
ROADWAY WIDTH: (1) 28 FEET
SURFACE WIDTH: (1) 20 FEET
SERVICE: (1) 15 HOMES
IMPROVEMENT NECESSARY:
RECOMMENDATION:
ROANOKE COUNTY ACCEPTANCE OF CARRIAGE HILLS DRIVE INTO THE VIRGINIA
ENGINEERING & DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECONDARY SYSTEM
INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT
ACTION NO. A -81192-4.d
Item No.
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
IN ROANOKE, VA ON TUESDAY,
MEETING DATE: August 11, 1992
AGENDA ITEM: Reallocation of funds for well at Hofauger
House, Virginia's Explore Park
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS: G 4"(
i
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.
The River Foundation is requesting reimbursement for all project
items involving the well at the Hofauger House at a total cost of
$7,206.56.
BACKGROUND:
On April 14, 1992 the Board of Supervisors approved a request for
up to $10,000 of the costs of actual well drilling for the Hofauger
House at the Explore project. At the time of the request the River
Foundation had estimates ranging from $6,000 - $11,000 for the cost
of drilling the well. Since the well has been completed, the total
cost of the well drilling is $5,269.50. The River Foundation is
requesting that the Board of Supervisors reimburse them for an
additional $1,938.06 for the cost of the well pump and interior
water lines within the Hofauger House. This would make a total
project cost of $77-207-54-, which is within the $10,000 limit
previously approved by the Board of Supervisors.
%��C.SLry
FISCAL IMPACT:
Funds for this project was previously appropriated from the
Economic Development Fund which has an unaudited balance of
$100,000.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Reimburse the River Foundation for the total project cost of
$7,206.56, as requested.
2. Reimburse the River Foundation only the $5,269.50 for the
actual well drilling costs.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors consider Alternative
1 and reimburse the River Foundation for $7,206.56 for total
project costs. This action meets the intent of the original
appropriation by not having the County expend over $10, 000 of funds
for the project costs.
Respectfully submitted: Approved:
[,V1-ZL ) i
Timothy W. Gubal , Director Mmer C. Hodge
Economic Development County Administrator
----------------------------------------------------------------
Approved (x)
Denied ( )
Received ( )
Referred
to
ACTION
Motion by: Harry C. Nickens
No Yes Abs
Eddy x
Johnson x
Kohinke x
Minnix x
Nickens x
cc: File
Timothy W. Gubala, Director, Economic Development
Diane Hyatt, Director, Finance
Reta Busher, Director, Management & Budget
ACTION NO. A -81192-4.e
ITEM NUMBER 3'—'6
AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
MEETING DATE: August 11, 1992
AGENDA ITEM: Amendments to the ADA Transition Plan adopted July
14, 1992
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY•
The original Transition Plan for the County's compliance with
the ADA did not recommend modification to the Catawba Recreation
Center because the County does not schedule the programming of that
facility. Staff has re -visited the site and suggests including the
lower level improvements to the facility which makes the building
accessible. The improvements for basic accessibility are estimated
at $3,260 and no new appropriation is required at this time.
The attached copy of the Transition Plan shows the changes on
page 5 which eliminates the language of not modifying the Catawba
Recreation Center as well as any reference to attempting to dispose
of the facility. This change will allow the modifications to be
scheduled with all other buildings incorporated in the Transition
Plan to be modified by January 26, 1995. Page 7 of the Transition
Plan has also been amended to reflect the anticipated $3,260 cost
to be appropriated in the 1993-94 fiscal year.
FISCAL IMPACT•
No new monies are required for the current fiscal year.
$3,260 has been added to the amount which will be requested in the
1993-94 fiscal year to fund improvements to County facilities
included in the Transition Plan.
7 b
RECOMMENDATION•
Staff suggests amending the Transition Plan for compliance
with the ADA concerning the Catawba Recreation Center as noted
above.
Respectfully submitted, Approved by,
xg"� A �
ohn M. ChamblissO,5Jr. Elmer C. Hodge
Assistant Administrator County Administrator
----------------------------------------------------------------
ACTION VOTE
Approved (x) Motion by: Harry C. Nickens No Yes Abs
Denied ( ) Eddy x
Received ( ) Johnson x
Referred ( ) Kohinke x
To ( ) Minnix x
Nickens x
cc: File
John M. Chambliss, Jr., Assistant Administrator
and Coordinator, Americans with Disabilities Act
D. Keith Cook, Director, Human Resources
Gardner W. Smith, Director, General Services
J-6
Revised August 11, 1992
COUNTY OF ROANOKE
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT
TRANSITION PLAN
JULY 14, 1992
SCOPE OF THE COMMITTEE
The County Administrator has appointed John Chambliss,
Assistant County Administrator as coordinator of the County's
efforts in the implementation of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. A Committee of County employees is working in three service
areas to ensure compliance with the various provisions of the Act.
The Programs Sub -committee will meet with each department of
the County to review operations and our means of accommodating
persons with disabilities for each program. Accommodation may be
accomplished as easily as providing communications aids to assist
the person, by permanently moving a meeting location to an
accessible point or providing a point of service on an individual
basis which does not violate the rights or ability to participate
of the individual.
The Employment Practices Sub -committee is reviewing the
interviewing and hiring practices of the County to ensure that we
are in compliance with the intent of the Act. This review includes
the physical examinations or other testing required for the filling
of certain positions and the sequence in which the events occur.
Also, if a person with a disability is hired, to help ascertain the
method of providing necessary accommodations for proper job
performance.
The Transition Plan is prepared as a review of each facility
operated by the County to identify and mitigate physical barriers
which may prevent the convenient use of our facilities by all
segments of the population. There may be instances where it is
not practical to modify structures to allow wheelchair access to
all points of the building. Some of these may be accommodated by
taking the service to the person. In other instances, programs
may need to be relocated. There may also be certain facilities
which do not need to be accessible to persons in wheelchairs based
on the type of work being performed.
TYPES OF FACILITIES
County Owned Buildings
These buildings are owned and operated by the County and are
the responsibility of the County for purposes of complying with
the intent of the Act.
1
s— to
School Owned Buildinas used by the Count
Structural improvements to these buildings are the
responsibility of the building owner (School Board) and internal
adaptations (shelving, counter height, etc) would be the
responsibility of the using party.
Leased Buildings
Structural improvements to these buildings are the
responsibility of the building owner and internal adaptations
(shelving, counter height, etc) would be the responsibility of the
using party.
SUGGESTED MODIFICATIONS
Signage
ADA approved signs utilizing uniform lettering as well as
Braille coding for directional signs, informational signs, and
points of service for the interior and exterior of buildings.
Counters
Providing counters and service areas of appropriate height to
accommodate persons in wheelchairs as well as ambulatory persons.
Doors
Maintaining properly adjusted doors which can be easily
negotiated by a person in a wheelchair. Thresholds must be level.
Doors must be of the proper width and have hardware (such as lever
style locksets) which is compatible to a disabled person.
Restroom modifications
Provide handicap accessible restroom facilities which provide
suitable space for negotiating with a wheelchair, have properly
mounted hardware (including grab rails, mirrors, tissue and towel
dispensers), piping under the sinks insulated to prevent burning
by hot water in the pipes, and stalls where necessary for
appropriate privacy.
Elevator
In instances where operations occur above the ground level
floors, elevators or lifting devices shall be considered,
particularly if the facility is regularly used by the visiting
public as well as for potential hires and existing employees who
may experience disabilities. In many instances, the need for
elevators may be avoided by providing alternative service methods
at an accessible location or taking the service to the person.
2
7-6
Handicap harking, curb cuts, walkways, railings, and ramping
Adequate parking spaces for disabled persons should be
provided for each facility. The area from the parking area to the
building entrance should be smooth and unobstructed. Ramps should
have a rise of no more than one inch vertical for each one foot
horizontal run with appropriate hand railings.
Water Coolers
Water Coolers should be mounted to allow ease of use by a
person in a wheelchair or there should be cup dispensers available
which would allow a disabled person to use this facility.
Pathways
Areas between the parking area in park facilities and the
restroom or picnic shelter should have a pathway suitable for
negotiation by a wheelchair or disabled person. The surface should
be smooth, unobstructed, and of a suitable grade (similar to the
conditions for a ramp).
SUGGESTED FUNDING
The Board of Supervisors included $25,000 in the 1992-93
fiscal year budget to begin implementation of the plan. Staff
suggests that $18,385 of this amount be utilized to install
signage, modify telephones, and adjust doors as the first phase of
implementation. The balance of $6,615 could be used to make
modifications required for newly hired employees or existing
employees who may become disabled. Any unused portions of these
monies would be used to continue down the list of priorities in
the subsequent year. These items should be completed by July 1,
1993.
$41,600 was included in the proposed bond referendum to
provide access to park related facilities. If the Bond referendum
is approved, these monies should become available so as to allow
these improvements to occur during the 1993-94 fiscal year. If the
referendum is not approved, these monies will need to be
appropriated in the subsequent year as well as monies to cover
major renovations to the existing Hollins Library facility which
have not been addressed within this plan.
An estimated $136,886 will be required between July 1, 1993
and January 26, 1995 to complete the repairs to County owned
buildings. It is suggested that $56,886 be appropriated for the
1993-94 fiscal year and $80,000 for the 1994-95 fiscal year. This
would address all of the improvements except the elevator for the
Public Safety Center on Peters Creek Road during the 1993-94 fiscal
year.
With respect to leased facilities, staff will negotiate with
the building owner to mitigate the structural needs of the
facilities and staff will address the internal operational items
3
b
(included in the projected costs above). It should be noted that
the staff is considering alternative space at the present time and
some of the indicated improvements may not become necessary. There
are several leased facilities used only one day per year by the
registrar's office. Suggestions for improvement to these sites
will be forwarded to the building owner for their consideration,
however, the buildings in their present condition are adequate for
meeting the needs of the voting public through the use of absentee
ballots or by having an election official assisting the individual.
FACILITIES WHICH WILL NOT BE MODIFIED
Outlined below are facilities used by the County which staff
suggests not to be modified. We have provided the rationale for
making the suggestion and ask for the concurrence of the Board of
Supervisors.
Roanoke County Administration Center
The Procurement Office is not accessible to the handicapped
and it would be too costly to equip this one area with an elevator.
Arrangements will be made to meet with disabled persons in the
Community Room or in a vacant office. Also, public meetings such
as bid openings will be scheduled in accessible locations.
Each of the three floor levels are accessible from ground
level entrances, however, there is no elevator to travel from floor
to floor. It is suggested that we consider deputizing other
employees to accept payments or transact business to minimize the
amount of travel between floors by disabled persons.
Public Service Center (Kessler Mill Road)
The offices of the Department of General Services are not
accessible from the outside and require travel through the
building. Monies are included to improve this condition, however,
the hiring of a disabled person may require more extensive
renovation including another handicap restroom.
The communications shop would require extensive renovations
including excessive ramping and handicap restroom accommodations.
No modifications are requested at this time.
** Public Safety Center Peters Creek Road
An elevator is suggested for the 1994-95 fiscal year to allow
disabled persons access to the second floor. This facility
contains Police, Fire and Rescue, Communications Dispatchers and
Data Processing personnel. Should the County hire a person for
one of these positions earlier, we may need to modify this plan or
provide for the elevator earlier to accommodate this need.
4
J- 6
Jail
Upstairs restrooms are not handicap accessible, however no
modification is suggested as handicap provisions are located
elsewhere in the building.
Sheriff's Office (Clay Street)
The entire area beyond the front reception area is not
accessible and because of the location of load bearing walls, it
is not practical to alter the space. Accommodation can be made by
meeting with the individual in other parts of the building or in
other facilities. There are no handicap restroom facilities.
Headauarters Library Building (419)
The second floor of this building is not accessible to
disabled persons. Meeting rooms and office areas on the ground
floor could be utilized for disabled patrons or employees to
accommodate this need.
Mt. Pleasant Library
There are no restroom facilities or water coolers located in
the space occupied by the Library. Restrooms and other structural
alterations would be the responsibility of the building owner
(School Board).
Hollins Library
This facility has not been included in the survey because it
is included in the proposed bond referendum. Should the bond
referendum fail, extensive renovations would be required to bring
this facility into compliance.
Ogden Recreation Center
The rear building of this complex is not accessible to the
disabled. No programming will be scheduled in this facility which
requires such access and no structural modifications are suggested
in this plan. The facility condition does not warrant the capital
outlay that would be required to bring this facility into
compliance.
Health Department - Vinton Office
This building is owned by the Town of Vinton and is leased to
the Health Department. Hallways and doors are too narrow, access
is not available to the second floor except by stairs, and there
are numerous other modifications which would be required to make
this facility come into compliance. Staff will discuss its
findings with the building owner for consideration.
5
T -b
Social Services (Leased Space at Salem Bank and Trust Building
The elevators in this building are too small and may not be
practical for renovation. The restroom on the fourth floor has
double doors making it difficult for a disabled person to enter.
These conditions will be discussed with the building owner for
appropriate action.
Public Safety Building #11 - Back Creek
The second floor of this building is not accessible to the
disabled and it is not cost effective nor is there demonstrated
need to provide an elevator for this access.
Public Safety Building #7 - Clearbrook
The restrooms, water cooler, and second floor area are not
accessible to the disabled. Staff feels that it is not cost
effective nor is there a demonstrated need to make these areas
accessible at this time.
Rescue Building #3 - Cave Spring
Access to the second floor available only by going outside.
Staff does not suggest an elevator to make interior access
available.
Public Safety Building #10 - Mason Cove
The restrooms are not accessible and there is not enough room
to modify them. Also the meeting room which is used by the
Community has not been included in this survey.
Public Safety Building #3 - Cave Spring Fire
The second floor is not accessible to the disabled and it is
not cost effective nor is there a demonstrated need to provide an
elevator for this purpose.
Public Safety Building #5 - Hollins
The Day Room and office area is located on an elevated area
and the meeting room is in the basement. Disabled persons do not
have access to either of these facilities. Disabled persons would
not be performing normal daily functions for the Fire and Rescue
Service from this facility and other meeting space is available in
the immediate area. It is not cost effective nor practical to make
these areas accessible.
Public Safety Building #8 - Bent Mountain
Major structural renovations and modifications would be
required to make this facility fully accessible and there is not
a demonstrated need to make this costly change.
Public Safety Building #9 - Fort Lewis
The Day Room and office area is located on an elevated
area and the meeting room is in the basement. Disabled persons do
not have access to either of these facilities. Disabled persons
would not be performing normal daily functions for the Fire and
2
Rescue Service from this facility and other meeting space is
available in the immediate area. It is not cost effective nor
practical to make these areas accessible.
Oak Grove Park
Restrooms are not handicap accessible and cannot be modified
due to the physical size of the structure. Do not suggest
modifications to this site.
Mt. Pleasant Park
Restrooms are not accessible by wheelchair due to location at
top of hill. Do not suggest modification of this facility.
COSTS AND FUNDING
Revised
Current appropriation $ 25,000 $ 25,990
_ 1993-94 appropriation 60,146 56,886
1994-95 appropriation 80,000 89,E)68
Bond Referendum 41,600 x-6$8
Total County Share of Costs $206,746 $203,486
7
b
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends adoption of this Transition Plan as
presented. The request for appropriation for subsequent fiscal
years and the monies included in the bond referendum will be
requested in the normal budget process.
Staff also suggests adoption of the Resolution of Intent to
Comply with the Provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act
to show the County's good faith efforts to comply with the
legislation.
Copies of these documents will be available through the Office
of the Clerk to the Board of Supervisors. Questions or complaints
may be addressed to the Coordinator for the implementation of the
provisions of the Act (Assistant County Administrator).
Future information to be presented to the Board of Supervisors
includes the appointment of a local Disabilities Services Board as
soon as the provisions are promulgated by the State. This Board
needs to be appointed by November 1, 1992.
Periodic updates will be provided to apprise the Board of
progress towards the completion of this Transition Plan as well as
implementation efforts in the areas of Programming and Employment
Practices.
Respectfully submitted,
117--It
�
n M. Chambliss, Jr., Coordinator
Implementation Committee
Americans with Disabilities Act
8
AT A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 11, 1992
RESOLUTION 81192-5 CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS
HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to
an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions
of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia
requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in
conformity with Virginia law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to
the best of each members knowledge:
1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from
open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the
executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and
2. Only such public business matters as were identified
in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed
or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the certification
resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. A`11en, Clerk
cc: File Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
Executive Session
AT A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ROANOKE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA, HELD AT THE ROANOKE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 11, 1992
RESOLUTION 81192-6 CERTIFYING EXECUTIVE MEETING WAS
HELD IN CONFORMITY WITH THE CODE OF VIRGINIA
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia has convened an executive meeting on this date pursuant to
an affirmative recorded vote and in accordance with the provisions
of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.1-344.1 of the Code of Virginia
requires a certification by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke
County, Virginia, that such executive meeting was conducted in
conformity with Virginia law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of
Supervisors of Roanoke County, Virginia, hereby certifies that, to
the best of each members knowledge:
1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from
open meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in the
executive meeting which this certification resolution applies, and
2. Only such public business matters as were identified
in the motion convening the executive meeting were heard, discussed
or considered by the Board of Supervisors of Roanoke County,
Virginia.
On motion of Supervisor Nickens to adopt the certification
resolution, and carried by the following recorded vote:
AYES: Supervisors Johnson, Kohinke, Minnix, Nickens, Eddy
NAYS: None
A COPY TESTE:
Mary H. Allen, Clerk
Roanoke County Board of Supervisors
cc: File
Executive Session